New Britain herald. [microfilm reel] (New Britain, Conn.) 1890-1976, 1923-01-24
BILLBOARD MUST Go
COMMISSIONS UkASE
Objectionable Sign on New Hotel
size Ordered Removed

The sigRhoaFi that stands an Tho
lsite OF the new haI"' mast he remoR
ed insnde n ia fdaFs, according 10 a
decision az tRr hhldlng a0mhHssinu
a. meeting last evening, John -,
Gilehneest, building inspector, report
81 he had told the owners n take il
down, They said that they wnud do
80 immediately ami would have done
50 before, but il was impossible on
traunl sol lHt Ftr.at sa0WaIafms.
fun bl' board Is made of 4n liamHa-
l. material and rs su'h % have been
erected without Sd permit
The llrgnsr nf Joseph ielEenhanm,
Plnmhtr which was suspended by
the hui ding commission some time
ago heeauso u waa thought that h,
did not comply with instructions rf
garlins the installation al NlHFes r.
a building ~ this corner ef Broad and
Smith streets VA fralnrch 10 hiiu,
InL Calls Furmat liar
Phiip !, TarmnN, Plumbing ~
sprclnr. denied having sanctioned ihr
placing Of tubs and bathroom uAiurc
IN tn famo room, although the con
tractor Joseph n, TVh oFnphutieat3
stat n that hr had showed thr p.Hns
10 the inspector and that g." hal 81
proved them, Mr.. Tofm1y asserted
that he had only sanctioned the waltr
connections. MIR TorWnF also Eiai i
that the Plans w"ra carried out N
spite Of Instructions and that verbal
notices had boon giyoa regarding IA"
changes.
IulI asked If M Tormuy mad not
=, en- where everything vas going,
"So" said Mr. TormaI You're a |
bar." replied Znk, 10 wac tod to
contine his remarks - the chair
tciGenbaum GAINED thai hr told I.
The plumber on thu lob not 10 go an! /,
further with the work, Tho plumber /
Frederick Faeg admitted having
proceeded with the work on his own /
responsibility although he said that
be warned the builder that If the sink /
was put in according 10 the plans jlc F,
ran chance Of having ,al,on OUT.
Judge William +. ManC"n. Woo rep.
resented Feigenbaum. said he did not .
think the man deliberately went .
against the laws and asked that the
license be restored
Must Make Building rircpronf
Tull was also instructed 10 maze a
new building on the corner Of Broad
and Curtis streets hrpproof before
February 6. The building was recent
ly Inspected ANA was found not 10 be
tiirproof.
a notice telling him u comply with
The law was sent on .%L>ember 10 ami
CHER notices were Haot after that
Gate. Zuk stated that the notice did
not reach min until ioJut two weeks
before the building was completed and
that it was then too iatc. He pro-
fessed ignorance Of requirements re-
ga rding fireproofing.
He demanded to know why he had ,
MOI been informed about it before the
was nearly completed. He
said that the building inspector had
not said anything regarding fireproof-
ing. He also said that builders should
be notified about this when the per
mits are taken out.
Contractors should Know Law
Israel WcNlcr a member OF the {
said that all contractors s
should know tie law before erecting {
structure. Mr.. NeNlcr further I
stated that the contractor did not
,omc around and explain to the COM /
mission bit tried to put something q
'ver." He stated that the law must 7
Dc complied with.
That he came to the office II tina a
tut, and complied with instructions j
vas the statement Of Zuk, which
tatement Mr. Gichrecst Immediately S
lenied. {
After a great deal of discussion it t
vas finally decided thar Iuk be In r
tructed to make the building fire u
roof to the satisfaction of the COM
mission. 1t was also decided that fu- W
ure requests for permits by him will a
ot be held up. ii
John kata is the owner of the s.
Zuli was represented by NJ. Ii
!. Sexton il