The Idaho Republican. [volume] (Blackfoot, Idaho) 1904-1932, 1923-10-04

to acres grazing $50, to Is acres
irrigated $1170, net increase in as
sessment of $315.
Page 118, line 27; E. F. Turpin
change IS acres irrigated land $3.50
and acres waste land IS to II
! acres irrigated $1105 and acres
waste SO, a net increase in assess
ment of 1853.
Page 11S, line %; E. F. Turpin,
change Is acres irrigated land $3.50,
4 acres grazing land $40 and / acre
waste land 81 to II acres irrigated,
S1115, 1 acre grazing $40 and
acres waste 81, net increase in as
sessment of $136.
Page 118, line 20; Sarah j.
Shrystal, change 33 acres irrigated
land 1880, 2 acres grazing land, 500
and acres waste land SIS to 38 acres
grazing $2470 and 2 acres waste 81,
net raise in assessment of 1857.
Page 118, line 80; C. w. Olson,
change 25 acres irrigated land $3.50,
5 acres waste land IS to % acres ir-
rigated $3.50 and 2 acres waste 81,
net increase in assessment of $287.
Page 118, line 81; John A. Ander-
son, change 80 acres irrigated land
$3.50 to $3.50, net increase of
5000
Page 118, line 80; E. r. Turpin,
change acres irrigated land $275,
IA acres grazing land $40 to 8 acres
irrigated $3.50, 5 acres grazing land
$50, 16 acres dry land $50 and added
$75 improvements, a raise in valua-
ton of $3.50.
in
change acres irrigated land $275
and IA acres grazing land $14O to
10 acres irrigated $500, 9 acres
waste 50, an increase of 1874.
Page 118, line "a; N. A. Goodwin,
change 10 acres irrigated land $3.50,
20 acres grazing land 5000 and IL
acres waste land $12 to rs acres ir-
rigated $500, 10 acres grazing 500
and Z acres waste 81, net increase
in valuation of $845.
Page 118, line SO; q. A. Broad
head, change 81 acres irrigated land
$3410 and Is acres grazing $3.50 to
~ acres irrigated $432O and acres
grazing $50, net increase in valua-
ton of 1910.
Page 119, line 1, Mary Williams,
reduce improvements $3.50.
Page 119, line 4 John R. Will
ANS, reduce improvements 500.
Page 119, line s; Peter E. Van
orden, raise improvements $500.
Page 119, line 6; R. M. Horton,
change 33 acres irrigated land $1,000
md acres waste 81 to 35 acres ir-
'igated $21O0 and acres waste IS,
! net increase in valuation of $198
Page 119, line g; ]. L. Van Orden,
change 80 acres irrigated $219O and
% acres waste land $40 to 35 acres
irrigated $2450 and acres waste
IS, net increase in valuation of
1885.
Page 119, line IL; J. L. Van
)rden, change rs acres irrigated
and $500, grazing land $50 and
acres waste land 81 to 80 acres ir-
igated $2100 and 10 acres waste
10, net raise in assessment of
1928.
Page 119, line IL; Edwin Mcbride,
hange 20 acres irrigated land
1900 and acres grazing $40 to 35
ores irrigated land $2450, net
aise in assessment of $3.50.
Page 119, line 16; H. ]. Arbogast,
hange 43 acres irrigated land $2582
nd Is acres waste land SIS to 48
ores irrigated 1920 and 10 acres
taste land $40, a net increase in
aluation of $3.50
Page 119, line IL; N. P. Fackrell,
hange SO acres irrigated land $4,000,
Z acres grazing $40 and 35 acres
+aste land $35 to SO acres irrigated
$500, 80 acres grazing 1920 and
0 acres waste $40, net raise in
aluation of $725.
Page 119, line 18; R. M. Horton,
1ange Is acres irrigated land $3.50
nd 20 acres grazing 5000 to 25
cres irrigated $3.50 and 10 acres
razing 500 and 5 acres waste IS, a
ct raise in assessment Of $3.50.
Page 119, line 10; T. ]. Farrell
lange 40 acres irrigated land $1450
I'D SO acres grazing $500 to 60
Continued on page 8