New Britain herald., 1923-02-03
Re,ol..lioa kal Nnoessar.

Al this talk about changing th, government suggests the possibility oI
 peiasleai revolution, but pF, Sleinmetl
 takes no stock in the idea.
 sI fear nc revolution iA the United
 States" he says ''f0F there can be nd
 revolution where there Is something
 worth keeping, instead there is snly
 evolution. II We may go hack to Rus
 aa once more we md there was a
 revolution there. because there was
 nothing worth keeping in the old sys-
 tenn, kerensky tried to evolve some
 thing good from it hut failed. II was
 necessary 10 tear d0Hza and start an
 over again, In 0nF form Of govern
 meni, there is much worth keeping
 and our people are sensible enough to
 see it There will be no revolution in
 this country, even the old possibility Of the clash between capitalists ana
 socialists Is past, If We have any
 trouble it will come from misled labor leaders or selfish politicians who call themselves radicals and form bloc Tor obstruction Of pf0gfess,s These men. either through their ignorance or economic law or through their seI. hsh egotism. present the only source of danger in our country today"
 The President io Manage
 Continuing his discussion of the new organization Of government, Dr.. Stein metz outlines briefly several of the features he expects to see adopted in II, Congress" he says twill con hnue to evolve into q tribunal. with prohibiting powers only, This means That the administration will he wholly m the hands Of hhe president and his | ministers who will hold positions for | long periods and will he non political | In nature like n city manager. Con. sfeas. acting as the board Of directors. VIII, however. haye the power 10 curb them when Il so desires even as the board Of directors may not approve Of all that the president Of the corpora. lon proposes. yet such board does not think Of firing the president be- cause he proposes ono plan that they 10 not like.
 certain questions of policy will be 'cferred to all the people to vote Up. 'n as referendum. A question such IS prohibition for instance. would ome under this heading. Its en. orcement is the problem for the ad- to handle, but its deter / Is question for popular ote. The majority of people are . apable of voting yes, or no when he question is honestly and plainly 4 sked. and that is 'the chief purpose f ballots. All this voting for and A gatnst men we know nothing about A little short of ridiculous. Curl 4 idiciary may be continued much in A s present form. Our courts need to F e reformed and vitalized. We must E ways have a supreme court to inter- B ret law and the present system of ap. IC ointing judges for life during good c ehavior is step in the right direc- IC on and should be applied to the ex- IC ,utive and administrative offices as z ell. lc We are a wonderful people and q i've wonderful country" concluded q r. Steinmetz. ''No other nation in c le world, for instance, would have q ken me ina cripple boy-and giv- c me the chance that it has. This r, atement made to Babson Institute r,
 not made in the spirit of criticism r, complaint but is made only because z. want to see this country forever = 'ow stronger and not be wrecked by ,ople who complain and agitate v ithout thinking the matter through V
 its final solution" II