The Birmingham age-herald., 1923-02-18
TRANSF FER MADE IN 'DCCKETS PENDING
 IN HIGHER COURTS
109 Cases Transferred From Court of Appeals to the Supreme Court by
 Agreement
STATE CAPITAL BUREAU 1
 THE AGE-HERALD ! Montgomery. Ala. Feb. IT

Under the agreement between the supreme court and court of appeals. 109 cases which were submitted to the court of appeals during the first call have been transferred to the supreme court and will be decided by the supreme court
 When the court of appeals was cre- ated in 1911 the two courts made a working agreement, knowing that great majority of the appeals from the lower courts would involve civil suits and criminal cases which could be decided by the court of appeals. This agreement for the handling of 60 per cent of appeals by the su- preme court and 40 per cent by the court of appeals has been in effect since that time.
 Cases transferred follow:
 First division-The Conecuh Naval Stores company vs. George W. Cas- tillow; Cunningham Hardware com pany vs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad company; Mobile and Ohio Railroad company vs. Mrs. Verda E. Turner; Mobile Light and Railroad company vs. ". A. Gadik; L. J. Knox vs. Rivers Brothers, ct als; B. A. Cranberry and R. D. Cranberry vs. James Barter, Jr.
 Second division--G. D. Collins vs. Hodges Lumber and Manufacturing company.
 Third division-National Casualty company vs. S P. Dunn; L. M. Fin lay vs. Louisville and Nashville Rail- road company; Mandy Goodson vs. D. P. Lilies; J. X. Henderson vs. Ala bama Auto company; T. A. Fay and A. S. Smith, etc, vs. R. L. Cox, de- fendant, and Montgomery Ward and company, claimant; Grover c. Bev- erky and J. H. Beverly vs. R. B. Rhodes.
 Fourth division-F. P. Folmar, ct als, vs. 0. N. Edge; c. J. Lurie, as Dothan Overall Factory, vs. Kegan Grace company; Lilla Myhand vs.. City of Dothan, Alabama; Abbeyille Live Stock company vs. Sam Walden; Jim Cato vs. ". ". Williamson; John T. Harrel1 vs. City of Dothan; J. E. Money and Otis Money vs. First Ma tional Bank of Newville, Ala; State vs. J. M Donaldson; J. r. Sorrell vs. Harry Seheuer.
 Fifth division-Z D. McCord vs. J. Hardy; w A. Warner and F. F. Candy vs. R. c. Barrett; N. F. Gerald vs. M. c. Kiser company; Libbie Powell vs. O. T. Smith.
 Sixth Division Cases.
 Sixth division-T. F. Griffin and F. E. Smith vs. Otto H. Handley; Brenard Manufacturing company, etc., vs. Theron Cannon; c. M.s Me AIahen vs. Western Union Telegraph company and Louisville and Nash vile Railroad company: Sunny South Grain company vs. National Feed company; County Board of Educa- tion vs Cement Products company; Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company vs. Jack Kimball; Louis- vile and Nashville Railroad company vs. R. II. Miller; Louisville and Nash vile Railroad company vs. Paul Dumas; Louisville and Nashville Railroad company vs. Gadsden Sani- tary Bakery, ct al; Corona Coal com pany vs W. c. Corry: J. A. Hill vs. J. S. Wittmeier. ct als E. c. Kinney vs. V. Foust; Western Union Tele- graph company vs. John D. Thomas; Borden Burr vs. Julia Munson, admx, etc %
 Sterling A. Wood and ". s. Pritch- ard vs. R. J. Mcclure; Alabama Great Southern Railroad company vs. Al moth B. Smith; Continental Casualty company vs. James J. Paul: Phill A. Halle vs. ". H. Brooks; Louisville ana NaSHVlile NS' B. F. Roden Grocery company.
 Walter D. Barnes vs. D. c. Ball and George W. Hays; City of Bir- mingham vs. T. c. Shirley; Atlas Portland Cement company vs. II. J. Sharpe: Birmingham News company vs. Birmingham Printing company; Dixie Pratt Coal Mining company vs. Arrant Insurance agency; Bis sell Motor company vs. Williaw F. Johnson; Harry. Berlowitz vs. Ada Farrell: Motor Sales corporation vs. II. A. Wisdom; W. R. Coker vs. Mrs. Mamie Coker. s
 City of Tuscaloosa vs. pr. Aston Fitts; Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad corporation vs. A. F. Bell; John F. Taylor vs. Birmingham Fertilizer company; Thomas A. Christian, ct al, vs. c. l. Meigs; Lizzie Wright vs. City of Bessemer; Bains Motor company vs. Grady LeCroy. pro ami; City of Bir- mingham vs. Mrs. Sarah l.. Carlson; Hugh Wildsmith and Margaret A. Wildsmith ys. John c. Graves; Simp- son Automotive company vs. Girdley Vines; Bond Brothers vs. John A. Bates; Herman Bevill vs. Henegar- Dooley Shoe company; James C.. Davis, director general of railroads, etc., ys. F. s. Dunlap; R. l.. White, ct al, vs. Leonard Hogland, pro ami; Citizens Bank of Winfield, Ala. vs. Commercial Savings bank of Guin,