The Connecticut labor news., 1923-02-16
ALLING'S REMOVAL.
(Continued from Page One.)

1 made.
 1 Senator Tone made the application
 and John Murphy, president of the 1 Board of Aldermen, as a responsible 'citizen, acted as sponsor. The clerk
 in the office gave permission as she had done on previous occasions to
 other organizations and individuals
 and all arrangements for the appear | ance of MT. Jewell were completed.
 ing, the day that MT. Jewell was
 scheduled to speak, the clerk in the
 office of the Board of Education call l ed up the headquarters of the Machin- 1sts and notified them that permission | for the use of the hall had been re- | scinded. MT. Hotchkiss immediately demanded that some one in authority 1 be called to the telephone and MT. Hall then stated that he knew nothing | of the case and referred him to Arnon filling as the person responsible for l the cancellation and told him to see filling for any information he desired. From evidence already obtained 1t IS now certain that the refusal to grant permission to use the hall was not for any violation of rules that the Board ot Education had made, be- cause the board is unable, or rather was unable, to produce any record of changes in the rules regarding these changes.
 The Trades Council is firmly con vinced that this is just one more eff fort on the part of filling to show his feeling towards organized labor.
 During the meeting the committee Investigating the abuse of the label of the Allied Printing Trades reported that as result of the. change in the conditions of employment in the plant of the Ideal Printing Company, To- eaten at I2o Dixwell avenue, the label of the Allied Printing Trades has been withdrawn.
 The report of President Ornburn, legislative representative of the Con nectiCut Federation of Labor, WaS then brought up and Mr. Ornburn told the Trades Council what had already been done in regard to legislative measores in which organized labor is interested. The election of judges by the people, and which he spoke in favor of at the hearing in Hartford, had been reported unfavorably, he said, in spite of the fact that at the hearing no one appeared against this measure.
 The workrnen's compensation act, which is schduled for March 2, is an- other bill in which labor is interested. the law increasing the compensation from 50 per. cent. to 6623 per cent, but MT. Ornburn cautioned the members on what they can expect from this legislature, judging from what has already hap pened in reference to the bill for the election of judges by the people.
 A delegate from the Metal Polishers Union told the members of the two Sim mons companies, one of which manufac- lures beds and has invariably been fair to labor, and the other which is affi1iat- ed with the famous Winchester company which he styled as twin brother and two of a kind
 Just before the meeting adj burned MT. Ornburn introduced Alfred c. Bueh1er, Yale Student, who as a member of the Heidelburg University of Tiffin, Ohio, debating team, toured the country taking the affirmative in the question, The Closed Union Shop Is Justified" Mr. Buehler made quite a lengthy speech in which first of all he spoke of the feeling existing between college men and mem bers of organized labor and told his hearers that far from having an an- tagonistic feeli-~ some of the best friends of the labor movement were col lege men and college professors
 Then he gave short synopsis of the manual labor he was forced to do him. self to help pay his expenses through col lege and stated that we are now living in time when 80 per cent. of the men go- ing to college were paying part of their way and a considerable number paying their entire expenses. The book which he was introducing bore the endorsement of a great many of the labor leaders of the country including Samuel Gompers.