The Bismarck tribune. [volume] (Bismarck, N.D.) 1916-current, 1923-12-03
EOS CASES0N
CALENDAR FOR
COURT ACTION
December Term of District
Court Will Open Here with
Coifey Presiding

term which, II the parties TO tne
cases agree to trial, will be one
of the busiest terms of district
court for considerable period.
Whether the Grim nal cases will
urccede the trial of evil cases
or come to trial after the civil
calendar is disposed of will not be
decided until after court convcnes
tomorrow.
TIE criminal eases listed in the
calendar are:
State OF North Dakota,
1701 vs..
Elias Elleflocd. Defendant.
Hav ny in possession property
designed and intended f-r use
i'm the manufacture Of lntoXi-
eating liquor.
State Of North Dakota,
1902 VS..
William Blevin, Defendant.
Having in possession and trans
porting intoxicating liquor.
State of North Dakota,
1908 vs..
Bruce Merrell, Defendant.
Having in possession and trans
porting Intoxicating liquor.
State of North Dakota,
1897 VS..
William Grossman, Defendant.
Maintaining common nuisance.
State of North Dakota,
1898 VS..
Peter Rennick, Defendant.
Failure to support his wife.
State of North Dakota,
1899 VS..
Fred Bobb, Defendant.
Employing female for more
than as hours and more than
Z days in a week.
State of North Dakota,
1909 VS..
John DeRoncey, Defendant.
Refusing to support his family.
State of North Dakota,
1892 VS..
Mary Luoma, Defendant.
Adultery.
State of North Dakota,
1893 VS..
O. R. Ellington, Defendant.
ENLIGHTENMENT.
State Of North Dakota,
1924 vs..
o. r. Ellington, Defendant.
Embezzlement
State of North Dakota,
1896 VS..
6. r. Ellington, Defendant.
Embezzlement.
State Of North Dakota,
1855 VS..
S. S. Mcdonald, Defendant.
Employing a female more than
S1-2 hours day and mere
than 4S hours week.
State of North Dakota,
1857 VS..
Nick Yoch m, Defendant.
Selling intoxicating Liquor.
State of North Dakota.
1890 VS..
Robert kirmo, Defendant.
Adultery.
State of North Dakota,
1851 VS..
John Walina, Defendant.
Adultery.
State of North Dakota,
1851 VS..
Andrew Bougas and Dan Bougas,
Defendants.
Employing a female more than
48 hours and more than 6 DAYS
in week
State Of North Dakota,
1852 VS..
Wong Wee, Defendant.
Employing a female more than
8 hours day and more than
6 days in a week.
State Of North Dakota,
1858 VS..
John Danabash, David Danabash
and George Cristo, Defendants.
Employing a female more than
AS hours and more than 6 days
in a week.
State Of North Dakota,
1854 VS..
Mike Saba, Defendant.
Employing female more than
3 days in one week.
State of North Dakota,
1891 VS..
Ennis Walter Taylor, Ira J. Stark
and George Jeffrey,
Defendants.
State of North Dakota,
1851 VS..
Charles Walters\ and Mrs. Charles
Walters, Defendants.
Keeping and Maintaining a Com
mon Nuisance.
State of North Dakota,
1886 VS..
John Bennett and Annie Bennett.
Defendants.
Keeping and Maintaining Com
mon Nuisance.
State of North Dakota,
1873 VS..
Theodore 0strom, Defendant.
Rape.
State of North Dakota,
1877 VS..
E. G. Patterson, Defendant.
Employing a woman in violation
of an, order of the Workmen's
Compensation Bureau.
State Of North Dakota,
1878 VS..
E. G. Patterson, Defendant,
Employing a female more than
AZ hours and more than 6 days
in a week.
State ofssNorth Dakota,
1897 Rvs.
E. G. Pat6esson, Defendant.
Employing female more than
48 hours and more than 6 days
in a week.
State of North Dakota,
1880 VS..
Fritz Bobb. defendant.