The Delta independent., 1923-06-15
DODGE RE. 0RT IN
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE
LITIGATION FILED
Judge, Sitting as Master, A.
proves and Confirms Position
Of ]. v. Oittemore.

"a nIA8atlOu Tue SuIlBIl0u 0ClSuC0
Church. sx-Fedsral Judge Dodge of
Boston. sitting A. Master under ap-
pointment Of the Supreme judicial
Court Of Massachusetts, has hled his
inal report on the evidence. The
plaintiff. John v. Dittemore. the senior
Director Of the Church, whose service
antedates the decease Of Mrs. Mary
Baker Eddy, and who his associates
sought to remove from Office, seems
to have been completely justified in his
contentious that undesirable and un-
wholesome conditions have existed in
the administration Of the church gov
ernment.
Judge Dodge finds from the evidence,
which includes testimony by the ma
jority Directors themselves, that Mr..
Dittemore's dismissal was for the pur-
pose Of doing away with opposition to
the wishes Of the majority and also
because Mr.. Dfttemore had sought to
establish 4 standard Of propriety and
conduct higher than desired by his as
sOciates. II II also found that q prin-
cipal reason for the hostility to Mr..
Dittemore was because Of his rebuks
to his associates on numerous ocea-
sions when offensive language was
used and offensive jests made at meet
ings Of the governing body Of the
church. Judge Dodge holds that Mr..
Dittemore 10 still legally q Director
and that the effort to remove him and
appoint q successor more sympathetic
with the policy of the board IL legally
aull and void.
In regard to the illesality Of Mr..
Dittemore's dismissal. Judge Dodge
says that no Director could fairly be
supposed to have accepted his posi-
ton upon the understanding that he
was subject to instant. arbitrary dis
missal whenever a majority of his as
sociates might find it expedient. The
Master finds that the vote attempting
to dismiss Mr. Dittemore was only the
formal adoption of a conclusion previ
ously agreed on outside the meeting"
and that it was for his associates, then
accusing him and at the same time pro-
posing to also act as his judges, to
afford him "such opportunity to be
heard In his own defense upon the
charges made as would satisfy the re-
quirements Of natural Justice" He also
ends that the complaints against Mr..
Dittemore were not founded upon flrst
hand knowledge and "were inadequate
ground for any but a purely arbitrary
dismissal" The Judge also nnds that
there was never any question AZ to Mr..
Oittemore's sincerity in maintaining his
position and that nothing said or done
by him in maintaining his opinions
>ould have constituted adequate ground
for dismissine him, unless the major
ity's power to dismiss could lawfully
have been used BY 1t for the sole pur-
pose Of stifling any opposition in the
Board to their wishes.
The Master declares that Dfrsc-
tors Dlcksy. Neal. Merritt and Rath-
von were animated by personal hos
tility toward Mr.. Dittemore and that
they had long planned among them
selves to get rid Of him One Of the
occasions when bad feeling was engen-
dered was when Dittemore refused to
Join Dickey, Neal, and Merritt in at
tending q play In New York which
Ddttemore considered Objectionable and
which had as the leading player q
person Of notorious reputation. On
this occasion Director Merritt testified
that he urged Dittemore to accompany
them and said: Come on with US.
You are not 30 much better than the
rest Of u.s."
Judge Dodge also flnds from the evil
dence that There were occasions In
1917, 1918 and 1919 upon which, at
meetings Of the Directors, the plaintiff
(Dittemore) expressed disapproval Of
h. - hind tnlAr-
able only when men only, and men not
disposed to be scrupulous In such mat
ters, are the hearers-thereby arous-
ing resentment ON Dickey's part, and
sometimes on the part Of Merritt and
Rathvon." The testimony regarding
eight or nine such instances was taken
by Judge Dodge In private. In regard
to all Of these occurrences Judge
Dodge nnds from the testimony Of
Mr.. Dittemore and others, including
the cross-examination Of the defendant,
Directors Dickey, Neal, Merritt and
Rathvon themselves. that Mr.. Ditte-
mors's account Of them was substan-
TALLY true and that his repeated In
slstence upon 4 standard Of propriety
In language or conduct stricter than
that accepted by his associates mate
rally augmented their hostility and
dislike"
Judge Dodge concludes that Ditte-
mors's co-Directors were "incapable,
on March II, 1919. Of impartial judi
cial consideration Of accusations
against him, especially Of accusations
framed by themselves had they ever
undertaken any such consideration"
At the present time Christian Scien-
lists throughout the world are deeply
interested In the facts brought out by
the Dodge report which Mr.. Dittemore
and others are distributing in large
quantities among the membership.
The progressive element In the
Church seems to be gaining much
.%.>n~<h t. vrros . move nonsls slant