Evening star., 1923-04-02


body"-wild ducks and woodcocks.
The Department OF Agriculture con-
trolls Center market and finds one of
| Its meat counters violating the game
| laws. 1t prosecutes the culprit, who
Is fined $500. and all hts Illicit game
goes TO Walter Reed Hospital to re-
fresh sick and wounded veterans of
| the world war. It is very bad to
violate game laws, but II you must
do so and get caught at 1t, remem-
| Der the hospitals.
! The National Republican, the or
| gan OF the national republican ez-
| ecutive committee, protests against
the resolution introduced by the
| American delegation to the interna-
tional conference at Rome. That
resolution called for a new interna-
| tional economical conference, which
| would discuss. and perhaps resolve
to pool. all the economic problems OF
! nations. The organ OF the G. o. p.
this country in the affairs and and
finances Of Europe, but ends it's pro-
test with the concession that If pri-
Vate individuals or banks Of Amer
lca want to loan their money to
but that the people ought TO have a
voice before any more public funds
are so loaned.
x X y =
Agreeing with the last proposition
that no more national loans should
be tolerated without voice from the
| - Ho1I
people are not concerned even in the
lending OF private funds abroad?
Every million dollars. even OF private
money. which is loaned to foreign
borrowers. takes away that much
| otherwise available funds for lend
! ing to productive industry in
America, and not only boosts inter-
est rates at home, but tends TO Grip
pie enterprise and depress wages.
While foreign loans cannot be bar
red from investors, do not these
bankers, who enjoy the protection Of
the American government, owe pa
trtotic obligation TO their own coun-
try and it's prosperity. paramount
even to their own profits? If that be
the case, then is IL absolute that
loans TO foreign enterprise must
never be taxed by the American gov
ernment> at a higher rate than In
vestments in American industries?
Does the protest of the National Re!
publican go far enough?
= : = :;
Give women liberty or give them
what they want" appears TO be the
theme OF an irnpassioned address by
Mrs. Emily Newell Blair, vice chair
man of the democratic national COM
mittee. She feels SO sorry for the
republican women who are not per-
mitted TO sit in with the men on the
national committee Of the C. o. P
She says: Tn 1924 we nominate a
President. What part can woman
have in choosing that man? The re-
be few credited TO that convention,
will have to renominate the candi-
date chosen for them. In the demo-
cratic party the field will be open
and free"
It is too bad. It's just like matri-
! mony. where the women don't have
a chance at all. They Just have to
accept any old stick OF a man who
happens TO think about proposing.
together and decide to run one Of
their own sex. That's liberty. Every
year will be leap year by and by,
and them they can agree on what
man is worthy OF their political sup
port.
= Z X :.
After all, is the reference TO the
non hoice Of femininity in case or
matrimony conclusive? Women do
not often do the proposing-they
have fun letting the men stammer
through that tortuous ordeal-but
! what about their hypnotic power
IN leading the poor chaps on to their
doom? Is all that tremendous fem
Inlne power paralyzed when it gets
into q convention where the men
hold majority? Som metimes the
balance OF power" completely un-
balances the powers. why worry"
Ono hair OF a woman can draw
more than hundred pair Of oxen"
X X = X
The authorities OF Washington
who control our downsittings. If not