San Antonio light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1911-1993, 1923-10-11
COURT PROCEEDINGS
In supreme Court.

In Supreme Court.
| Austin, Tex, Oct. 1.-THE following
proceedings were had in the supreme
Court Wednesday:
wichita FANS. Ranger & Fort Woi Ii
Railway Company vs.. Leslie Combs.
First State Bank Of Hawley, Jones; C,
al. Harris; Magnolia Petroleum Compan,
ct al VS.. Mrs. c. L. Hamilton. admins
tratrix, Grayson; Mrs. c. u. Hamilton
administratrix. VS.. Magnolia Petroleum
Is Santa Re Railway comnahy vs.. Mrs
Dora d. Williams ct al. Hunt; Texas
4 Pacific Coal and on Company VS.
Mrs. Sudie Barker ct a.. Eastland.
Applications for writs Of error refused
Ludthe ct al. Harris; Consolidated I'm
derwriters VS.. Mrs. Nancy Z. Free ct al
stephens; City of Bolton vs.. osborne
Ellis, Bell; St Louis-southwestern rail
!way Company OF Texas VS.. Wesley n
Powell, Hunt; c.. E. schaff, receiver. VS.
L. w. Lyon. administrator, Hunt; c. E
schaff. receiver. VS.. odeile Merchant Ell
| al, Hunt; Greenville National Exchangt
Crier VS.. Thomas \, Cowden. Taylor
Grand Court of Texas Order OF Caianthe,
VS. ]. T. welch. HSrris.
Applications dismissed for want o.
ME Morab ct al, Eastland: Hicks Rub
her Company VS.. Columbia Tire and Rub
Der Company. McLennan; A. I. Luse Ell
ial VS.. c. d. Beard. Tarrant; Fort Worth
Is Denver City Railway Company VS.. 4.
L. Snodgrass. wiibarger: John B. At
kipson vs.. Susis II. X. Lyle et al, Leon
Ic. Roe Hall VS.. Montgomery Brothers,
Anderson; c. NJ. Armstrong vs.. Paul
willoughby. Tom Green; r. NJ. Ellered
Tvs. l.. A. Whit ct al. Halo: Tom +. Bran
stetter VS.. W. II. Hook. sherman; Cisco
Banking Company vs. Vacuum OIL COM
ct al VS.. ida ii. Bale Wood; James c.
JAWS, agent. VS.. r. S. Adkins. Wood;
z. +. Sehaff, receiver. VS.. Riley Wright.
Hunt: Fred Edwards ct al vs.. John
MaT Ta Ka ss f. Paving Ga@e COMPANY erayson
Policy & whitehill Tvs. The Texas Com
pany. Tarrant; Fort Worth & Denver
City Railway Company VS.. Mrs W. T.
rs. c. C. Highsmith ct al. Harris: Hous-
ton Ice and Brewing Association VS..
Armour & Company. Harris.
Applications dismissed on agreed mo-
ton, Mrs. Ida Perdue, administratrix'
/ Motions for rehearins' of cases over
ruled: Ferguson Mckinney Dry Goods
Company VS.. Joseph L. Garrett, Nueces;
| r. f. Hewett vs. First National Bank
Railway Express Company VS.. /. c.
Voelkel, Collins; L. ID. Stark VS.. r. B.
George, Harris; West Lumber Company
VS.. F. n. Henderson, guardian, ct al.
VS.. saletIa Kelley. Victoria: Lee X. Wells
Tvs. Mittie Jamison. Bexar.
| Motions for leave to file petition for
manSamus overrulcd: I. Z. Goggan VS..
] Hon. r. A. Peasants, chief justice. ct
lal; The state Of Texas VS.. Judge Robert
| w. b. Terrell. 'r--
Motions for permission to file petit
tions for mandamus granted: Phil ID.
TNN,,,,1 40 We AN r. =
kins ct al; Charles scribners Sons vs..
Is NJ n Mars, State Superintendent,
etc: W. p. H. McFaddin ct al. VS..
Hon. George c. O'Brien. Judge. etc. (two
cases..
Motions to dismiss granted: r. NJ.
Ellerd VS.. L. A. White ct al. Hale; c.
/ Z. Schaff, Receiver, VS.. Riley Wright'
Hunt; Mrs Ida Perdue, Administratrix'
VS.. C. e. schaff. Receiver. Hunt
granted: Texas Pacific Coal and OIL
Company VS.. Mrs. sudie Barker ct al
Cause reset for November IS, 1923:
Louis Carver ct al. VS.. J. W. Howard
Cause Withdrawn from section A Of
commission Of appeals and referred to
section B: e. r. Bryan VS.. Ruby Bryan
johnson ct al. Hill.
nesday by the supreme court on reports
of the commission of appeals:
Judgment OF Court OF civil appeals
affirmed: The Pullman Company VS..
Ben Ransaw, Ell Paso.
Judgment OF the court OF civil appeals
reversed and Judgment of district court
awarding Edds 2s2H acres OF land af-
fifned and Judgment of district court
rs to the 1875 SIS acres reversed and
Judgment rendered therefor for plain
ltiffs in error: y. d. Allen ct al VS.
IL. ID. Draper ct al. Jim Hogg.
Judgment OF court of civil Appeals
reversed. that of district court affirmed
W. H. Smith ct al. VS.. c. L. Frost NC
Lehman.
of civil appeals reversed and rendered
10. A. Caruthers VS.. NJ. d. Leonar, Tom
| Green.
/ Judgments reversed and cause re-
manded to district court: !. j. Mozoch
ct al VS.. J. d. sugg. Williamson: ].
IW. +. Land VS.. Stanley Banks. Angee-
lima: solomon Liddell ct al. VS.. ]. A.
judgments affirmed: V. A. Petty ct al.
VS.. Paggi Bros. OIL Company et al
Hardin: Minnie Rettig ct al. VS.. Hous-
ton West End Realty COMPANY harris;
reformed and affirmed: Glenn Lumber
Company ct al VS.. Elliott Lumber Com
lpany, Eastland.
Judgment OF court Of civil appeals
reversed and that OF district court az
firmed except as to costs: J. ]. Case
Threshing Machine Company VS.. y. b.
JUDGMENTS Of court OF civil appeals
and district court both reformed so as
to deny foreclosure OF lien. and IN az
other respects affirmed: Security Bank
ling and Indemnity Company VS.. g. T.
JudSmcnt of court Of civil appeals af-
flrmed: Potter County VS. c. q. Slaugh-
ter Cattle Company Lubbock.