San Antonio light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1911-1993, 1923-02-15
COURT PROCEEDINGS

Austin. Tex. Feb. I4.-Ths following
proceedings were had in the supreme
court Wednesday:
certified questions answered: J. c.
~ First district
Writs OF error granted: Texarkana ami
ort W orth Railway Company vs. Frank
Brass, Hill: C. W. Ware vs.. J. r. Jones
eL a.. Larrant; this case was advanced
and referred TO section 4 Of commission
OF appeals; William Moore ct al vs.
Carey Brothers Oil Company et al Wich-
tia; Mrs. ". y. Clement vs.. First Ma
tlonal Bank Of Paris, Lamar: II. From
hoff VS.. B. Fronhoff. Bowie
Applications refused: Ed Rlslnger ct
a.; vs. c, f. Clark ct al. Fort Bend:
I'd j. Cussen VS.. Right Reverend Joseph
p. Lynch. Hemphill; First National Bank
OF Longvtew vs.. James c. Davis. Agent.
GresS; II. II. Watson VS.. James c. Da-
Wis, Agent. ct al, Gregg; Lancaster &
Wallace, Receivers VS.. r. A. Sexton
Administrator, Harrison: J. Z. YeaEer
VS.. Mrs. \. B. Bradley, McLennan.
Applications dismissed for want OF
Jurisdiction: s. NJ. Sager VS.. Sam Shultz.
stephens; Dempsey Oil Company VS.. Paul
W. Torrans, Marion; John Eugore vs..
Hopkins County Levee Improvement Dis
trict No. 2. Hopkins: John Anderson vs..
Western Union Telegraph Company. La
mar: Mrs. Amy Grace Dodsou vs.. W. 4.
Kennedy Trustee. Upshur.
Cases submitted: Z. II. Perry and Com
pany W.. J. II. LanEbehu, Galveston:
P. G. Adams ct. al. VS.. r. E. seagler
Motions for rshearing Of causes over
ruled: Zaidee /. Foster vs.. MarCellus
E. Foster, Harris.
|. Motions for rehearing OF applications
overruled: W. G. weimer va Prince
and Prince, wichita; NJ. II. Thomas and
Company W. r. c. Hawthorne ct al.
Dallas; Southwestern Telegraph and Tel
ephone Company vs.. J. +. French ct al,
Harris; Lang Floral and Nursery Com
pany vs. Pat Sheridan, Dallas: Kate
Seaman ct al. VS.. The Schumacher Com
pany, Harris; Arcola Sugar Mills COM
psny VS.. 7. 3. Blanchard, Harris: Arcols
Sugar Mills Company VS.. The Schu-
machsr Company, Harris Mrs. NJ. c.
BeRdy ct al. VS.. Fidelity Lumber Com
pany. Tyler. t.
Motion to advance granted: state OF
Texas eN rel. w. r. 'Merriman ct al. ".
NJ. t, Ball ct al. Jefferson.
Motion TO argue orally motion for rf-
hearing overruled: NJ. X. Thomas and
Dallas
Motion to dismiss application granted:
Dempsey oil Company. Ltd. vs.. Paul W.
ToranS. Marion.
Motion for leave to file petition for
mandamus granted: Katharine Borchers
vs.. Hon. W. S. Fly ct al.
Motion to require bond in sum ot
st2, 500 submitted: Philip Freshwster e.
al. vs.. r. - hOyL et AL MlCnAl0 ANhAS~
Justice Cureton not sitting.l ---..-.-
Motion TO advance submitted: NJ. E.
Breckenridge ct al. VS.. y. H. Roberts
ct al Bexar tChief Justice Cureton not
sittInEO.
Motions for rehearing submitted: Fan
ME N. Alien ct al. vs.. West Lumber
Company ct al, Polk; c., c. and 5. p
Railway Company VS.. Anderson Clayton
and Company. Dallas: G., c. and $. y.
Railway Company VS.. Anderson Clayton
Cause withdrawn from the commission
OF appeals: Kirby Lumber Company 1et
al. vs 6. n. Conn ct al. Newton. tThiS
cause was also advanced
The following cases were decided N-
day by the supreme court on reports fo-
the commission of appeals;
Opinion Of the commission OF appes
answering certified questions adopWh
and ordered certified TO the court e
civil appealS: w r FELTON, vs.. j. y.
Johnson DaiIarn; .Texas Electric Rail
way Company VS.. c. :. GreenhiL Hill
J. \. Slower VS., Dick Gilbert e. g.,
Palo Pinto: Texas and Pacific Raiwal
Company vs.. c. ID. Cave 81 al, Jone
Ole o. Haverbekken W. Coryeu touhE
ct al, Coryell.
Judgment OF the coutr OF civil appeals
(dismissing the appeal affirmed; car
Isle Rowntree ct al. VS.. Peck FurnItu'4
Company, BeNar. EFT,
peals and district court reversed ara
Judgment rendered that defendant On
! error take nothing by Its suit; Ma
and Mays vs.. First state Bank OF Ne''
Ter. Tararnt. ,F
judEments OF the district court one
court OF civil appeals reversed and sens
remanded TO the district court; Jess
Lamar VS.. Panhandle and ;. +. RAN
way Company et al, Potter.
Fourth Court Of Civil Appeals.
Proceedings Of the Fourth NoAFL %
Civil Appeals at san Antonio:
Motion for reheariug ovcrrulsd' w -
Williams vs.. Walter Oliver from Van
Verde. .srr.. .
ed. ]. L.. Farh vs. =. ZTheis BeNar.
case affirmed: K. E. Moss vs. 4 .
| Koetter BcNar; c., II. x :, \ haANSt
Company vs. City-Ot Eagle Pass. AaNeL-
| ick: C. W. Whitaker vs.. har2io ~
! tees. Bexari Advance RumeN HhsSs '''
/ Company vs. c, A. Bleyins. beN1L a,
| Reversed and relnanded. George W
| S,ndsrf,,r vs. sam Beard. BcNor.
| cases submitted: Mercedes Fro9net
| ConpRn WIS, v. c. Duncan, Hidalg9.
| Pablo de Ia Cara vs.. r. p. klShulohg.
| N1,prick: Mercedes ProducC Compai!S
Tvs. r. II. Reddy. Hidolgo; Border Mtil-
| inc Cornpsny vs.. Rcdnary 3 Eilunecs -
/ Psxar. state Bank OF orange Grove "
IT. Y. Williams, Nueces: ;. 4 =,
| railway Company rs. Mrs Nicy ~ SIN
| cIFta-v, KRrnes: George 2 Mandry v
| 6-SV-T Cracker and Candy ComnanN
j Rrv1r. Lear star Immigration CON
J r5ny v Il. SchaGwinkJs Cameron: I'LL
! f,6hn ~ =. J. Harmon. jim Mele
| SSyereirn camp w. .. W. " fetfa
I RodriEuo-. Gonsaies: a. p. Alllson. eooi