Every evening, Wilmington daily commercial., 1922-07-12

Mr.. Hartman objected TO Mr.. Rein
hardt's sarcastic manner towards
Adair. and Reinhardt said he would
try 10 cure IL.
Adairs testimony was chiefly de-
NAL OF statements of other witnesses.
Court recessed until $50 o'clock.
Yesterday Afternoons Session.
Several witnesses We're heard yes
terday afternoon.
Edward b. du Ross testified at the
morning session that he sold the
dwelling SO4 East Eighth street, prop
erty Of his wife. to John Dudzinski, a
client of Adair's. in August, 1921, for
$3.50. Of which Sis was 10 be paid in
cash and the balance was 10 be cover
ed by mortgages. Adair gave him
checks. Mr.. du Ross stated, but they
came back from bank marked mo
good" In tho afternoon Robert G..
Hartman, solicitor fer Adair. vainly
attempted to prove by du Ross that
Ada.r offered TO make the alleged bad
checks good. du Ross declared he had
no animus against Adair.
David J. Reinhardt, on behalf Of the
New Castle County Bar Association
next called John Dudzinski 10 the
witness stand. Through an interpre-
ter Dudzinski testified that he gave
Mr. Adair se5 on October 29,y192l, OF
which sl4.44 was in a check. and told
him 10 pay the SOS TO du Ross the next
day. but Adair did not do so.
On cross examination Dudzinskt
said he did not know when he paid
the SOS 10 Adair. He stated the money
which belonged 10 him. was handed
/ by his wife 10 Adair. Dudzinski de-
MED that he told Adair to hold pay
ments until they aggregated 5000 anc
then get deed for the property. At
rorney Hartman objected to the in
terpreter. thinking he was not correct.
/ ly interpreting the questions, anc
suggested that another man take hi:
place, but Mr.. Reinhardt dissented
alleging that the man proposed wa:
interested in the case. Detective
kempski announced that the inter
prefer was interpreting the question:
correctly. Dudzinski again declared
Adau was not 70 hold the money unit
instsllments aggregated $500, but VA
70 pay il Immediately 10 du Ross.
Bronislaw Dudzinski, wife OF Johl
Dudzinski, testified that the Sos be
longed TO her husband. On cross-ex
ANIMATION she denied telling Adair /
was her money.
Raymond dudziuski. son of Johl
and Bronislaw Dudzinski. testified
that Adair said he would give the S.
10 du Ross the next day. The witness
stated that Adeir on February &c
1922, requested that the warrant OF
an embeZzlement charge be withdrawn
remarking that if il was not with
drawn the Dudzinski's would get Il
trouble. On cross-examination tn
son said his mother handed the sos I,
his father and he paid IL 70 Adair.
Mr.. Reinhardt next called City So
hCitor Reuben Satterthwaite, Jr., L
testify regarding the charge agains
Adair in connection with the sheriff
Isale of John Longs property. MI
Satterthwaite. who was legal advise
70 Sheriff Walter S. Burris in 1911;
testified that Mr.. Adair in that yea
offered him $50 TO examine the recor
in the Long case and advise Mr.. Burri
TO pay S3l0.69 surplus from tn
sheriff's sale 10 Adair. On cross-ex
animation Mr.. Satterthwaite said h
considered the offer an attempt I
: bride, and on redirect examination h
stated the Court Ct Chancery con
templated proceedings 10 restrain tn
sheriff FROM distributing the surplus
Norman p. Crouch. register
Chancery. presented certain record
which the Superior Court admitted a
evidence. They included the origini
bill OF the Court Of Chancery in I'll
case Of John Long against Walter /.
Burris. Robert Adair and Julia A. j
Adair. affidavits Of Mary Kaiser. Harr
l. ellis and John Long. the answe
. Of Walter S. Burris. the motion fc
a decree. the order setting aside a dc
cree pro confesso, stipulations
counsel and the decree of dismissal.
Harry l. Gillis. who was deput
sheriff in 1913. testified TO a power
attorney authorizing Adair to cole,
the surplus, which was subsequent
, revoked.
Mrs. Mary Kaiser. daughter of job
Long, testified that Adair paid son
taxes on the Long property. but h
mother paid most of them.
; Horace g. Eastburn. who was s,
licitor for Adair in 1913. identified lie
ters from the then Chancellor Charl
NJ. Curtis to Adair and himself ar
replies thereto, and the Superior Cou
= admitted the correspondence as ev
. Sene'