The Nezperce herald. (Nezperce, Idaho) 1900-1957, 1922-08-31
F,<prcr COURT SEPT. s,
]. Criminal and AZ Civil
Aces. and Only Three for
Divorce. BE Interest
ing Term.

DiV0rce.--De AnooAoo
ing Term.
ubae the docket for the tefn
.,Iewis county district court
y II T. open here on September
sI.uext Tuesday is Longer
~ \ usual the nature of quite
NJ anmber of the actions is such
II not much general interest
m III center in them, and with Il
amber M of them the trial of one
!, IT answer for the others of
;@ilar Nib nature. If the two state
,,ys .s are tried out in this term,
mrv will be required and the
sseral interest will be consid-
,nble especially in the second
ne
Tbe decrease from normal liz,
he suits filed for divorce is re-
imshing, it may be that this
Hndency can be maintained un-
ii some day our peace-loving
. little county will boast a term
If court wherein no one seeks
b annul the marriage contract.
The docket follows:
Criminal Calendar
State vs. C. w. Bense: obtain |
ing money under false pretense.
G. c. Pennell prosecuting attorn-
g
State VS.. Julian Bloodsworth
grand larceny. G. G. Pennell
pOsecuting attorney.
Civil Calendar
Lewis county VS.. B. j. Fike,
Harry Mitchell, ct al; foreclos-
He Of liens. Fred E. Butler,
lttOney for plaintiff; Eugene
Cook, attorney for defend
ntS.
William A. Burghardt VS.. Eu-
enc O'Neil, ct al foreclosure of :
x certificate. Lawrence O'Neil
ID ?. w Mitchell attorneys for f,
aintiff. I
Commercial Bank & Trust Co., )
D. P. Donovan and wife !
t on promissory notes. Chas. :
Chance, attorney for plain !
I; Merritt, Lantry & Merritt, = :.
. Tannahill, attorneys for de- E
dantS. =
'amuel H. Root VS.. Sophias q
Mlkkelson; suit on account. :,
gene O'Neil attorney for =
ntiff; ?. w. Mitchell attorn- =
for defendant. =
entral Highway Dist, VS.. w. d d
larckel, ct al. suit for right
way. G. Orr McMinimy, G. =,
Nugent attorneys for plain y, "
z. w. Mitchell attorney 9,
defendant. ~
the matter of the solvency ~ =,
e Bank of Kamiah; f. S. :
iall attorney for plaintiff. "
Il. Smith VS.. Grover Ander- y y
and Bank of Volmer; fore - =
re claim of lien. G. Orr -
,mIimy attorney for plaintiff. I,
Ilage of Craigmont VS.. Will a a
D. Kirby and Maude E. n. r.
=; foreclosure claim of lien. 80
rr McMinimy. attorney for -
lalge of Craigmont, VS.. Mat ~ ~
elm; foreclosure of claim ~ =
en-. G. Orr McMinimy at da iIo
y for plaintiff. ~
lage of Craigmont VS.. w. 10
Jennings; foreclosure on IN m
OF lien. G.. Orr McMini- NJ NJ
attorney for plaintiff. Rl, N
age of Craigmont VS.. Mrs. Ra 20
e Ratliff; foreclosure on do, M
Of lien. G.. Orr McMini- W
lttorney for plaintiff. nj,
lge of Craigmont VS.. Ar 90 81
Cooper; foreclosure on g
OF lien. G.. Orr McMini- Do
ttorney for plaintiff. mr. : n
-es M. Root VS.. Mrs. M. r. a++ p
and j. w. Matlock; fore %
e of lien. p. w. Mitchell, diy
eyt for plaintiff; r. Fl. tor to
rg, Eugene O'Nneil, at j
$ for defendants. Mi
K OF Vollmer VS.. John SEN M o1o
I'd John Senter; suit on tor
Fred E. Butler, attorney \
alniff; p. w. Mitchell, at Xiv
Tor defendants. olo.
VI. Hauck VS.. j. T. STAN for
suit on promissory note. +
Nugent, attorney for plain ati(
: w. Mitchell, attorney dar
sendant. Ga, Co.
. Fike VS.. D. Hoover; suit
G. I'll. Nugent,
y for plaintiff; G. O.. r
|, attorney for defendant. = :
Meilke VS.. I. j. Medved; Ia. "a.
| account. Fred E. But .te1 ~ :
torney for plaintiff. w
McGee VS.. Herbert IL. "o