Amarillo daily news. [volume] (Amarillo, Tex.) 19??-current, 1922-06-30

be- rity commission had granted his re-
Iucst ANA ior him 90 g't four or five
strI Officers aud go o. the cts Park
hat nlght and keep orloi and not per.
Hit amy disturbance or trouble Ca dis.
orderly conduct
ny reasons tor mot calling session
II the commission to grant Nj Norris
equcFt IN the receipt ~ hls first tolo.
vum VIZ because did not know what
the subject Of hig address would be- aud
IL was thought ana expressed by some
people that perhaps hc WAS going 20
't'ack one 81 our distinguished fellow
ritinns.' who was holding high and
honorcd office. and perhaps would dis
uss other matters that bon my iudg
mont. could be- OF uo benefit 10 our
It's and that fclt y a. be- my duty
.p protect my hUmc pcupl, and our
DISTINGUISHED citizen IL the rumor
hat wns current was correct and I
uriher ten that myself and The city
0umis0ion had the right 10 know what
be- subject of hr address would boz be-.
oI, the permission was granted not
bat did believe that Our worthy ciu.
zen to whom refer was capable Of
ukirp care uf himself
After rc. living the second telegram
tating rho subject uf his address there
vas no objection mad, hy me nor by
the ,ity commission hut fun authority
was granted him 10 speak IN the city
Park in less than two hours after his
telegram with that information was re-.
'"ivcd and this information that the
O Dqu"gt Ind been granted was tcle.
,'honcd 10 HE sister a. she had been
notified would be- done. and she sud she
would convey the information 90 Mr.
Norris on his arrival about noon on
the Denver train.
Il have made these statements that
the public might know the truth and
tho circumstances IN FUN just as they
occurred I do not offer one telegram
md suppress the others. nor do make
one statement and conceal the truth
rs 20 Others ! give IL Ia you In fun
thpt YOU may clearly know Just cx.
arilv what tbuspircd relative to the
matter I VIII Say this. that | never had
conversation. received letter or tcle-
gram from the Federal Judge. who has
hpcn n mart 81 this controversy. nor has
De- received an, Uch from me, nor
have discussed with our distinguished
citizen o. whom referred. on over
hard him mention this matter. I never
heard Norris sneak. NOE had ! ever seen
D "a. ID -.
from him prior a. th, kilograms that
I have produced. and all that ! know
relative 90 him h what have heard
and have seen published IN the news
rap,rs, consequently I was neither
ta'cd nor preiudiccd against any Of
'he parties IN the controversy that had
been hofur" the public Tor some time.
knew that some controversy o. mis-.
understanding had existed between our
distinguished citizen" aud Mr. Norris,
according % street rumors and puhlica,
tions made IN the Amarillo daily papers,
and from such things Idrcw my infer.
rncc. and 10 make myself certain was
why ! preferred to he Informed If the
subject OF the address before ! request.
ed The city commission o. grant the
request that had been asked FOR and
after I had been informed as o. wha,
the subject NJ the address would ia.
he permission WIS immediately granted
ind Mrs Duncan was Immediately moth.
tied and presume that she notified her
brother. as she stated that she
would do.
Sincerely.
Ion u MAEEg