Payette enterprise. (Payette, Canyon Co., Idaho) 1909-1935, 1922-04-13
COURT HOUSE NEWS.

Perky e. Brinck appearing as coun-
sci for plaintiff and the defendants
not appearing by counsel or other
wise. and their default had been
dulv entered, after their time for
answering the complaint had ex-
pired. Proof was submitted in sup
port of the allegations of the COM
plant and decree entered in favor
of plaintiff as prayed in complaint.
Nature of Action: Quiet Title to lots
l6 and II of Blk 3 of the Original
Townsite of Payette, Idaho, as shown
by the original plat thereof, filed by
w. e. Masters on Jan. 10, 1887, in
Office of Recorder of Aday County,
Idaho.
On Tuesday, April the 4th Dis
trict Court was in session and the
following cases came on for hearing:
Frank Richardson VS.. Jesse Banks
ct al, Nature of Action: Foreclosure
of Deed, Attys. of Record: A. l..
Freehafer for plaintiff and Stinson,
Harris and Mcclure, and Calvin Kel-
lar for the defendants. At this time
the counsel for plaintiff in this ac-
ton appears in Court and makes
motion in open court that the above
entitled be dismissed as to the de-
PENDANT, the First Bank of Council,
which motion is sustained. In ac-
cordance with stipulation of all
parties herein filed this day, Frank
Richardson, plaintiff is ordered
placed in possession of the mort |
gagged land and premises in question.
In the matter of Creation and Or
ganization of Drainage Dist. No. 2, !
Payette County, Idaho. This cause !
came on for hearing, regularly with
A. L. Freehafer appearing as coun- |
sci for petitioners and R. E. Haynes |
appearing as attorney for Fred L. |
Berg, a remonstrant, demonstrating |
generally to said Petition. M. R.
Lewis is called on behalf of petit
TONERS, is duly sworn and testified. /
Norman H. Farnham VS.. City of
Payette. The hearing on Petition
for Separation of Agricultural lands
from the City, continued until April i
at l D. m.
Charles H. Morehouse VS.. Andrew
Little & clifton Sherman. This case
came on regularly with Hugh e.
McElroy appearing as Counsel for
plaintiff and Finley Monroe appear
ing of srecord as counsel for defend
ants. Upon order of the Court, at
this time, attorneys Frawley and
Koelsch were entered as associate
counsel, for the defense. (Injunc-
ton easel Witnesses were sworn
and examined on behalf of both sides
and exhibits were introduced and ;.
the Court ordered that it is to bel
submitted on briefs by counsel for
plaintiff within 20 days; defendants
to submit briefs ten days later.
Inter State Highways Service Co.
VS.. Idaho Canneries, Inc. Nature of
Action: Debt. Counsel for plaintiff,
l.. M. Lyon appeared in Court at
this time and the defendant appear
ed by counsel Norris & Sutton. The
demurrer of the defendant was over
ruled and the defendant was given
20 days to answer.
Court adjourned until Wednes-
day, April fifth, 1922, and the fal,
lowing cases came on:
VIM. w. White VS.. D. R. Under, ,
Nature of Action: Debt. Continued /
for term agreement of counsel s
Haynes for plaintiff and Stone and
Jackson for defendant.
S. F. Sherman VS.. Idaho Canneries,
Inc. Nature of Action: Debt. L. NJ.
Lyon for plaintiff and Norris and
Sutton for defendant Deposition of {
5. F. Sherman road, and exhibits in !
troduced. Judgment rendered
S641.1S, principal and interest. c
Costs to be added.
-, Henry T Williangs VS.. Carl William !
loiis 20tAG Grogan, Nature of Action. |
neplevin. ]. H. Holman for Plain
.iff and Haynes & Wilbuh for De-
-endants. In pursuance to stipula-
ion herein by the respective coun-
sci, this cause is hereby dismissed, I
each party paying his own costs. a
Court adjourned until April 18th, L
1877, and on that day the following Z
,ame on: t
Gordan E. Stone VS.. Lower Pay p
cite Ditch Company G. Extension h
Ditch Company, Nature of Action: 2
INDUCTION. Norris G Sutton for n
plaintiff; A. L. Freehafer for de- v
.endants. Temporary Restraining t
order was ordered to issue and the
iefendant's bond is fixed at $1,000 b
Norman F. Farnham VS.. City of b
'ayette.. Calvin Keller for plain Il
III and' A. 0. Sutton for defendant. f
DEFENDANT offers Motion to Quash h
service of Summons. Taken under F
ldyisement by Court. Nature of II
Action: Petition for Separation of Il
Agricultural Lands from Municipali- d
y Il
Harry Kent VS.. s. ]. Raby, Nature
i Action: Injunction. Haynes & p
Wilbur for plaintiff and Ira w. Ken a
ward and Norris & Sutton for de- "
endant, Defense demands trial bv ta
ury and is denied same by Court ii
sworn and examined ON p
10Th sides, and the Court ordered a
ne case to be submitted on concur- VI
ent briefs, plaintiff and defendant a.
ach given five days to submit such ts
riefs. 0n D,
Payette Heights Irrigation Dis
rict VS.. Nickolaus Hoffman ct al tc
.ature Of Action: Quiet Title to the al
10 a Of NWh the NWA of MEL
I Sec. 26, and the SWA of the A
EA of Secion %, all In II. N al
:. D w; B. M. Default of defendants Il
as ordered entered. r. r Havnas fl