Norwich bulletin., 1922-07-01
SHORT CALENDAR MATTERS
 REFoRE IT1DGE WE

The last short calendar session for the | May term of the superior court was held l in this city Itiidav morning with the | following r1attersdi. tosed of by Judie | James H. Webb:
 Selikowitch vs. Connecticut Mortgage demurrer of Connecticut Mortgage & Title Guaranty Co. postponed to New London. Thursday, a. m.
 Taylor vs Duca, ct al. Termination of continuance. 2 If no defense, judg- ment cs -'e--'-e off
 ws- trust Co. Of New l,:~ "-
 Ex ,..ore Line Electric Ky. Co.
 O!d Colony Trust Co. vs. Shoi'e I/e
 Electric Railway Co, ct al. Hearing on | claim of Westinghouse Traction Brake
 Company for allowance as preferred
 claim, off
 ] Washington Trust co. vs. Thompson
 1 Judgment. ? Foreclosure and limita-
 tion of time off.
 | R. A. Sherman Sons Go. vs. Doyle 1 | Judgment. 2 Foreclosure and limitation
 of time off
 U. s. Trust Co.,. of New York. ct al.
 Exrs. vs. Shore Line Electric By CO. Old Colony Trust Co. vs. Shore Line Electric Railway O.. ct al. Application Il of Robert W. Perkins. receiver, for au- thority to sell land at Groton Long Il Point, granted. to be entered on receir of consents. Hearia= on motion of heirs ;, Of Thomas B. Hewitt that receiver sur fender possession of land and equip ment to them. off Lomas & NtttIeton Co.,. IT,, vs. Oddo, ct al. Supplemental judgment. grant ed.
 Miner vs Christie. ct al. Foreclosure
 and limitation of time, judgment pass
 ed
 Henry V. KandeIky. ct al.. petition for 7 change of name to Kendall, granted.
 Main vs. State Highway Commission, application for re-assessment- Adseps- ance of report of committee, accepted. | Grinnell Co.,, vs. Kolb Carton Co.,. Inc a Hearing for damages, judgment for S1,- z 9s1.ss
 l. J. Smerchansky vs Cheney. ct al. mo II ;, ton to set aside non suit and permis 'l sion granted to furnish bond. granted 2 bond of s75 to justify in 10 days. ' M. Smerchansky vs. Cheney. ct al U motion to set aside non suit and permis 'ee sion granted furnish bond, same a U preceding.
 = Mysic Manufacturing Co. vs. Davis 7 director general. ct al. default for failur - to plead. answer in two weeks. f Cottrell, ct al vs CottrGl, ct al, ExrS
 appeal from probate, non suit for failur to file reasons of appeal, reasons in thre . weeks.
 - Horowitz vs Murphy. Adnx, 1, confT
 nation of report of committee. accepte and approved, 2, approval of deel c !. committee approved; 3, supplements ,-i judgment granted. Yardusky vs Dmytryshyn, 1. confrma :, tion of report of committee, accepte
 and approved; 2. approval of deed c ,- committee, approved; 3, supplements s- judgment. granted
 P. Schwartz Co.,, vs Walker, IT., ,e al, 1, confirmation of report of commit ts tee, accepted and approved; g. approvs ,s of deed of committee, approved; 3, sur o pIemental judgment, granted , A. Benowitz & Co. vs. Allen Spool an ,S Wood Turning Co. Order of stay of sui |, Order entered.
 Brothers, ct al vs. Wilbur. Guardian ,o appeal from probate. 1 That judgmen Ie on motion to erase be opened. 2 Permis -o sion to erase. 3 Judgment for apTIllan ,o on pleadings to files off.
 Barnes vs. Mystice Valley Creamer
 Go. Order for filing and allowance of tn z. claim of Ralph c. heeler as preferre s claim, order entered. ::n Neleber vs. Colchester Farm Produc .a il Go. 1 Acceptance of receivers retur It It on order to pay dividend, accepted an is dividend of 39 72 per cer, ordered ,. sh Order disros F of HInearntI premium on receivers bond Decree terminal ne ing corporate existence of defendant, ol nc ders entered.