The Morning Tulsa daily world. [volume] (Tulsa, Okla.) 1919-1927, 1922-01-10
MRS. FRANK SEAMAN. City Auditor
FIR tNK f. DUNCAN. City Attorney.

published in the Tulsa Daily world Jan
uary o. Osaud H. 1899. World Pub
fishing Company, PubllshersD
ORDINANCE NO e239.
An Ordinance 10 apportiOn. levy and
essesa nrG thS cost OF mPT9yi,n9E rci9sd pSTHbGn
STREET IMPRGvEMENT 'bIsTRIcTT
NO. 3t5, against~ the abutting prop
erty, the property benefited, and 9th.
the owners thereof. in said STREET
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT; and de-
clating an emergency.
WHEREAS, IN pursuance of tho provi
sions Of the Charter ~ the city Of Tulsa
oklahoma. the Board Of Commissioners OF
said city did. by resolution, declare II
portion Of Brady street. In cluded in
STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
NO. 34b Of said city and said board did
set forth In said resolution the nature and
extent OF the improvements to be made
on said portions of Brady street, and tho
materials with which said improvements
we've TO be constructed and that said i'm.
provements were to be made according to
the plans ana specifications to be sub
mitted by the city Engineer. which said
plans and specifications were thereafter
submitted by the said Engineer and duly
adopted by said Board, apd said Board
dtd thereafter duly advertise, Tor scaled
provements, In accordance with the said
plans and specifications; and,
WlfEREAS, "A contract Tor the cOnstru-
tlon Of said improvements was duly
awarded TO Western Construction CO., who
executed the bonds required by law, and
the cay Engineer has prepared submitted
and fned mis- written statement conta'r
Ing the names Cf the persons, Urms cor
poratlons and states owning abutting
property the property bCnerited and other
property liable TO assessment 'or said M
provements on the portions Of BRADY
street IN said Improvement District,
the number Of front feet owned by
Zach. and designating the property
owned by each by block or lot number or
otherwise 50 as 10 Identity iha .Au-, sud
also containing an estimate ot the Total
cost OF such improvements tho
portion and amount Of such costs To
be assessed against the Sbuttlng
property, the property so benefited. and
other property liable to Assessment, and
the total amount to be appOruoEri 10,
levied and assessed against Such property,
/ and the owners thereof, according to tho
benefits resulting from such Improvements,
and said Board has duly eNamlred re-
yised. corrected and approved said written
/ statement, and has duly eter,umaI by
resolution TO assess the cost Of such I'M
( proVements and directed d0tices thereof 20
be given TO tho owners Of such proper ~
by publication as provided N said Char-
| ter. and has required due notice 20 he
served upon the owners ~ such property
/ by registered letter addr-Fiei 70 such
/ owner and deposited In the Postolnce 81
/ the city Of Tulsa, Oklahoma, and Fald
board did In said resolution and notice
sci date on which II would hear all
matters affecting such property, Cr the
benefits thereto, or any clai" or uahllly
] or objections to the 1aHlhg nt 'urh IN
] provements or irregularities In any Of the
l proceedings in Tefersure 20 the nPkins NJ
tons thereto: and n pprsu tn'a oi hall
/ action, publication an / notice, surh tts
/ sion was duly conyeued an I held py ms
Board at tho time drsig1asol ~ shld
D notice; and,
WHEREAS. at suea s"ss!1. sh's Beard