The Guthrie daily leader. [volume] (Guthrie, Okla.) 1893-1996, 1922-11-16
NswsERRY FACES NEW CONTEST


I AZ AAANAf az Ft-A AA AttN N~tt~tA "HN++"
be obtained by such means.
J Ol the &C senators who voted 70
.esi Mr. NeWberrs the following have
last been sefeated Calder OF New
York. Frsnce of Maryland. FREEING
huysen of New Jersey. kellogg q
minnesota. Poiulexier of Washington.
and N the primaries Senator Harry
New. republican was eliminated a.
was senator McCumber OF North pa
kaia. All the foregoing republicans
I with the exception cf McCumber and
kellogg have been replaced by demo
Gratis and it is hy 10 means certain
/ whether Mr FIaz'er Of the non par
4 tissn league would vote as did Mr
McCumber. i he follows LaFOIetie.
I he gill not. and De has followed the
Wisconsin senator .on many other IS
sues IN the past lt IS also worth
noting that Senator ladd Of NORTH
4 Dak ta another non partisan LEAGUE
senator. voted 10 unseat Mr. New
berry and il is natural-to suppose
Mr. Frazier would do likewise As
for the new senator from Minnesota.
/ Mr shipstead. he toe IS a radical and
S likely TO 81 s.ong with the western
radicals ike laFoilette Norris and
ihe theirs who have made the fight
against Newbefryism.
OF the 4 senators who voted
against Newberr- the following have
been eliminated since the vote. cul
herson o. Texas, democrat. in the prl-
maries. Hitchcock. democrat. and
Pomerene democrat. and Sutherland.
West Virginia. republican. in the cleo
sion last week. In addition to these
/ Senators Myers OF Montana. demo
orat Wiilias 81 Mississippi. democrat
and Kenyon Il Iowa. republican who
voted to unscat Nevherry. have re-
tired from the senate.
The SUCCESSORS 70 these three men
are stephens Of Mississippi. democrat.
who viii vote as did Williams: How
ellis. Of Nebraska. republican. a rad
ioai VINO probably would vote with
the iaFolieties Norris Norbeek group
q republican radicals Mr. Neeley of
West virginia democrat. who wouid
naturally vote with his party AGAINST
Newberry as hardly a democrat vot-
od 70 sest Newherry when the vote
Vas taken last time: Mr. Brookhart
q Iowa. who y an intimate friend
of Kenyon and thinks as the latter
does on ihe Newberry case: Nr. Fess
I 81 Ohio. who as an administration
spokesman in the house would more
likely heiH Newherry in the senate
than oppose him. This makes the
ieiai gain for Newberry -Fes, r.
Ohio The total Newberry loss is 8
The previous vote vas a. to seat
Nr- NeRberry and Al 10 unseat him
The forecast vote on the basis of the
elections ilst held would change this
to s. in favor q Newberry and - "a
unseat him.
W those not voting on January 18th
last when the roll was called. sena-
tor Grow or Pennsylvania. has been
succeeded by Senator Reed ano,he,
republican Senator Du Pont Of Dela-
ware has been elected to the shor,
term bur viii not he a member Of ths
next congress when damocra.
Thomas F. Bsyard. will be in office
The chances are the issue will no,
come np till the next session anx-
how. when the new congress is in
stalled Senator Kendrick Of Wvom-
ing. democrat, has succeeded himself
The others who didn'f vote we're Saa
siors Reed Of Missouri. stanley o,
Kentucky. and Watson Of Georgia
democrats and Senators Moses II New
Hampshire and Hiram Johnson of
California. republicans. The probable
gain for ar Newberrv among those
who happened 70 be absent when the
lfirst vote vas taken would seem TO
be Reed of Pennsylvania and Moses
Hiram Johnson has already said he
; would have voted against Mr.. New
berry had he been present 50 his
Probable loss 10 Newberry from the
original non-voiing group would ap-
pear 70 be six-Kendrack of w-yom-
ting. Reed OF Missouri. Stanley Of Ken
tucky. Johnson of California. Senator
George Ct Georgia. who has succeed
ed the late Tom Watson. and Baysrd
of Delaware.
The indicated vote On the basis Of