Norwich bulletin., 1922-05-27
FOR over S35,0OO
IN BUSINESS OF SUPERIOR COURT

ockooneff vs.. Noble. Disclosure of de-
tense or judgment OF.
Shay VS.. Mantle Menhaoen Oil &
Guano Co. Hearing on receivers semi
annual statement as of April /, 1922,
accepted and approved.
Barnes vs.. Mystic Valley Creamery Co.
Approval Of receivers semi-annuaf !
statement. approved.
Anna Schranim Schnellen VS. Jacob
SchneIen. Alimony pendente lite. off.
Moskowitch vs. Avery, ct al. l Con-
tinuance. Further order of notice; post
poned.
Storrs. TT vs.. Metzendorf. ct al Mo-
ton to open default postponed
Gillette VS.. Town OF Lyme. Appeal
from Probate. Judgment by default for
want of answer. off.
Bertha. C. Latham VS.: Charles, E. La
than. Hearing on motion OF June Is,
1921, that the order OF the~court for
payment of alimpny, pendente lite be
vacated Withdrawn.
Shea vs.. Berkowitz. Motion to cite IN
certain parties defendant. granted.
B. Shoninger Co VS.. Pyne. Argument
Of demurrer and motion for more specific
statement, postponed.
roupasz VS.. Tytla.' ct al. Argument of
demurrer. postponed.
Ziminskf VS.. Kelly Confirmation of
report of. committee and Judgment, re-
monstrance or other pleading to be filed
in ito weeks.
Carl Hopf VS.. Flora c. Hopf. That
Plaintiff be held. in contempt for failure
to comply with order of court in pay
.rnent Of alimony. pendente lite, postpon-
ed.
Helen D. Beebe VS.. Leon J. Beebe Sec
ond order of notice, granted.
Butts, Shareholders Agents. etc. VS..
King. ct al. Petition of j. Moss Ives,
receiver, for leave to intervene, grant
ed
Colt. Exr. VS.. Wells Judgment by
default, judgment granted by default.
Joseph Peter Crevoiserat.S Petition for
Change of Name to Joseph Peter Con-
verse. Hearing. postponed.
Ais. Exr. VS.. Atwood Judgment,
postponed.
Agar ct al. vs. Tronsides Board Co.
That the case be given preferred stand
ing upon the list and assigned for trial
some day in the present term for the rea-
son that it is an action for the specific
performance of contract of lease of
| the mill property. which contract was
executed October %. 1919. and was to
| comm ence not later than May l. 1920
| that the defendant refuses to deliver pos
| session of said premises to the plain
/
of ease is being destroyed by the post
ponement OF the case and the inability
| OF the Plaintiff. c. A Agar. 1ncorporat-
ed to obtain possession OF the prop
erty for the specific performance of
which it is suing: and for the further
! reason that the defendant has, in 'vio-
| lation Of the order of injunction. sold.
transferred and otherwise disposed Of
the property which 1t was pronosed to
lease b. the execution and 6Alivery Of
a mortgage for one million dollars. post
porNd.
Fisher ct a.. VS.. Lain. Default for fail-
| ure to plead. answer in two weeks.
y Carpenter VS.. J. A. Avery. In. De-
fault for failure to plead. answer in two
| weeks.
Fields vs. WILLIAMS Exx. Appeal
from Probate. NoIt-suit for failure to
! re reasons of appea.. reasons in two
weeks
di Francesca eft al. Va. Amanth;a.
| Adn1r.. ct al 1 Allowance on account
to receiver $500. > Allowance on ae-
| count to COUNSEL for receiver, 500
Mariners SAVINGS Banl- KS Continental
Hotel. Incorporated. Foreclosure and
| lir-i+at;on OF time postponed
Chap man. ct al. vs.. Jakobik, ct al.
Answer in two weeks.