Daily Kennebec journal., 1922-01-31
COURT NEWS

according to assignment the
Burke and Barley cases are to come
before the supreme judicial court
today, Tuesday, Jan. 81. The five
cases are as follows:
Burke VS.. Piper, admr. with Pat
tangall and Locke Of Augusta for
burke. and Piper being represented
by Cover of Skowhegan, J. H. Hud-
son and A. S. Littlefield; Murtha vs..
Burke ct al with Cover, j. III. Hud-
son aNd A. S. Littlefield for Murtha
and Pattangall and Locke for Burke
ct al; Murtha vs.. Burke ct al, Cover
for Murths and Pat:angall and
Locke for Burke ct al; Piper, admr.,
VS.. Burke ct al. Cover for Piper and
Pattangall and Locke for Burke ct
al; Piper, 'admr.. VS.. Burke ct al with
Cover for Piper and Pattangall and
Locke ct al.
The BARLEY Notes
The case of John. A. Burke VS..
Ellsworth A. Piper. administrator of
Nelson w. BARLEY estate will come
llrst. In this case John A. Burke
sues to recover two notes. one for
$1,000 and the other for s1,400
which at the trial fer murder of
BARLEY, Burke claimed were given to
him by BARLEY in settlement of the
liquor deal. Handwriting experts
will be called in to testify to the sig
natures.
+ The next case will be William
Murtha VS.. Flossie and John Burke,
having to do with a note given by
Burke Of $1,000. A second case be-
tween the same parties is over the
mortgage given to secure the note in
! the preceding case. The last two
suits were brought by Piper against
the Bdrkes to recover on note and
mortgage given Bartley by them.
New Entries
List Of new entrees at the January
term 1929 of the supreme judicial
court of Somerset county which con
| yened Monday morning after the ar
| rival of the IL o'clock train having
been adjourned since Friday after
noon, are as follows: tgw
Nellie M. Newell, libelee VS.. Ralph
r. Newell. Frank Plumstead; Will
liam McBeth VS.. 3. Fl. Lawrence,
| w. F. McClintock and +. A. Covell,
Andrews, Nelson and Gardiner; A. L.
Cox and Son, VS.. II. l.. Smith, Gibbs
Harry S. Dyer ts. M. j. Bagley,
Gibbs: Harry s. Dyer rs. Victor I.e-
bel, Gibbs; George Gagnon VS.. Free
Cyf and inhabitants of Madison, Tr.,
Gibbs; John F. Holman VS.. Harvey
d. Eaton, HOl3m: American Can
Company VS.. Harry 3. Farr. Sawyer;
+. D. BIaisdell VS.. Roy T. Danforth,
Sawyer: Fred w. Bunker VS.. Char
les Fl. Morton. Sawyer; Truman &.
Carl VS.. Willie Quint, Sawyer: l.. NJ.
Ellingwood VS.. David Thompson,
Sawyer: r. Z. Gould VS.. Carroll II.
Fish and Madison Woolen Company,
Tr.. Sawyer: Z. ID. Humphreys and
J. l.. Rowe vs. Tom Pease. Sawyer;
Fl. W. Kennison vs.. Erwin Steward
and Q. w. Chase, c. II. Bartlett and
Asa S Taylor. Trs., Sawyer; McEl-
vain, Hutchinson and Winch VS..
Herman Smith, Sawyer: Joseph r.
| Pooler US. Joe Lateleipp, Sawyer;
Reuel II. Reed and Enroll b. Reed
VS.. Alden Adams, Sawyer: Reuel II.
Reed and Enroll B. Reed Us. Orrin
Page, Sawyer; Everett r. Sawyer VS..
r. r. Haynes, Sawyer: w. A. Tay-
lor VS.. Adolph st. Peter. Sawyer.
A. B. Willis VS.. Levi Coro,, Sawyer:
Lester Williams rs. A. J. Dumphy,
Sawyer; Lester Williams VS.. Harry
Hilton, Sawyer; Max Goldberg. Harry
Goldberg end Abram Goldberg VS..
Maine Pulp and Paper company,
George w. Heselton, Fred F. Law
renee; Reuel Fl. Reed ana Enroll r.
Reed VS.. T. s. Austin, alias Tyler S.
Austin, Sawyer; The Holyoke Ma
chine company vs. The Maine Pulp
and Paper company, Ralph w.
Crockett; Harry NJ. Bush VS.. Ed
mund Dayon. Mills; E. A. Piper VS.
Forrest A. Newton, Mills: Forest
Baker, collector vs. Hartland Grating
company, Coolidge: Emma A. Black
we'll VS.. Inhabitants of Harmony,
Coolidge: Everett c. Fayles VS.. Clar-
ence H. Hanson, Coolidge.
Harry l.. Goodrich VS.. Mertie S.
Bennett, Coolidge: Harry Z. Good
rich KS. Joseph H. Williams and
Della Williams. Coolidge: Harry f.
Randlett vs., Arthur o. Stedman and
Pheba Stedman. Coolidge: George
A. Woods vs. Arthur b. Lancaster,
Coolidge: Lewis b. Wheeler VS.. AL
bert L. Smith and Elna r. Smith,
Coolidge; Lewis =. Wheeler vs.. AL