Chariton courier. (Keytesville, Chariton County, Mo.) 1878-current, 1922-05-12
CIRCUIT COURT
First Day, Monday, May Is


Kelso ct al. Partition.
2. Amanda Clarady ct al VS. Ora
B. Clarady ct al. Partition.
8. Dora White ct al VS. Laura Davis
let al. Partition.
a. J. H. Lee ct al vs John T. Craig
et al. Partition.
5. State of Missouri vs John Hick-
ey. Illegal selling and giving away
liquor.
6. State of Missouri VS. Ed Witt
Manufacturing intoxicating liquor.
Z. State of Missouri VS. Ed Chap
man. Same.
s. State of Missouri VS. John Dra-
per. Giving away and having in pos
session Intoxicating liquor.
8. State of Missouri VS. Geo. W. An
.derson.
10. State of Missouri VS. Robert D.
Bowman. Carrying concealed weap-
ions.
II. Pauline Rains ct al VS. Helen
Washam. Partition.
IL. Fannie Jansen VS. w. J. Bre-
wer ct al. Partition.
10. R. Perry Arnold VS. Chas
Faever, Ethel Gaunt and Geo. Jones
Change of Venue from Linn County.
Is. J. B. Miller VS. NJ. J. O'Connel
Mandate.
Second Day, Tuesday, May 16
II. In the matter of Bee Branch
Drainage District, a corporation.
Is. ]. E. Merrifeld doing business
under style and firm name of Central
Missouri Monument Company VS. j. A
Burnside. Debt.
19. Frank Unterneer. Petition fol
naturalization.
20. Henry Easterhouse. Same.
q. Ernest Emil Ratzloff. Same.
%. William Henry Renne. Same.
%. James Ray, sr. Same.
! "a. Fulgentine Fengal Ackenborg
Same.
25. R. NJ. Wrenn VS. ]. NJ. Whiting
ct al. Note.
26. R. NJ. Wrenn VS. C. A. Shoop
Note.
27. In the matter of the adoption
of Francis Cracy.
2S. Clark f. Jacoby VS. NJ. ]
iO'Connell. Debt.
20. c. w. Bowen VS. Sarah A. Mil
ler ct al. Ejectment.
/ 30. Manley Strickland VS. Ac,
Doss. Appeal from ]. P. Court.
Croy ct al. Suit to ascertain title.
32. Henry Ohlendorff VS. j. r
Thompson. Accounting.
Third Day, Wednesday, May IL
/, SO. E. A. Carter VS. Wabash Rail
way Co. Damage.
"a. John B. Shannon VS. WabasI
Railway Co. Damage.
S5. Daniel F. Wymore ct al VS. Su
sand F. Sanders. Suit to set asid
deed.
Sc. H. H. Halliday ct al VS. Ell
worth Tourney. Contract.
81. W. A. Williams VS. E. Tourne!
ct al. Note and Attachment.
38. James r. Allen ct al VS. E. NJ
Williams. Partition.
80. Mary Flemming ct al VS. Johl
N. Hayward ct al. Will contest.
40. R. A. Nelson VS. Ben B. Bike
man ct al. Note.
| Al. Louise A. Hayward VS. JohI
N. Hayward ct al. Partition.
AZ. Louise A. Hayward vs. Josepl
Hayward ct al. Partition.
43. Louise A. Hayward VS. Sophro
MIA Con ct al. Partition.
"A. Louise A. Hayward VS. Rucke
Hayward ct al. Partition.
As. Melvin Miller ct al VS. Bruins
wick Cash Mercantile Association
Appointment of Receivers.
46. ]. NJ. Fetterhoff VS. Frank Ly
Itsell. Account.
.4s. Pattee Plow Company VS. G. A
Switzerland. Note.
40. Hays Pump & Planter Co. v
G. A. Switzerland. Note.
| so. S. w. Pilsbury VS. G. A. South
erland. Note.
81. Rachel Dinsmore VS. Virgins
Dinsmore ct al. Partition.
So. Bee Branch Drainage District
a corporation VS. William o. Bayne e
al. Corporation Tax.
So. Bee Branch Drainage District
a corporation VS. Henry o. McCurr
let al. Corporation Tax.
54. E. B. Shipp VS. John Barto
Payne. Damage.
! 55. City of Salisbury VS. F. l
Moody.
56. Amelia Lane VS. Lawrence Kent
Iner ct al. Suit to set aside deed:
| Fourth Day, Thursday, May Is
| 81. ]. A. Engleman ct ali. W. Maj
tin ct al. Mechanics Lein.
5S. Huck Milling Co., a corporation
Tvs Toney Miller & Co. Account.
! SO. Emma Belts VS. John A. Tay
lor ct al. Injunction.
go. G. A. Switzerland VS. NJ.
O'Connel. Account.
81. John j. WEIGH VS. Wabash Rail
way Co. Damage.
62. Farmers BanlA Of Charito
County VS. Robert E. Hurt ct al. Al
tachment.
90 N uy2L-L. - - - C3r,.