The Devils Lake world. (Devils Lake, N.D.) 1920-1982, 1922-03-01

but are they not right in demanding
that they be placed on an equal foot
ing with the buyers of their products
and with other industries?
Let us, then, consider some of the
farmers grievances, and see how far
they are real. In doing so, we should
remember that, while there have been,
and still are, instances of purposeful
abuse, the subject should not be ap-
preached with any general imputation
to existing distributive agencies of de-
liberately intentional oppression, but
rather with the conception that the
marketing of farm products has not
been modernized.
An ancient evil, and a persistent
one, is the undergrading Of farm prod
ucts, with the result that what the
farmers sell as Of one quality is re-
sold as Of higher. That this sort of
chicanery should persist on any i'm
portant scale in these days Of bust
ness integrity would seem almost in
credible, but there is much evidence
that it does so persist. Even as I
write, the newspapers announce the
suspension Of several firms from the
New York Produce Exchange for e1-
porting to Germany as No. 2 wheat a
whole shipload Of grossly inferior wheat
mixed with OATS chaff and the like.
Another evil Is that Of inaccurate
weighing Of farm products, which, It
is charged, is sometimes a matter Of
dishonest intention and sometimes Of
protective policy on the part Of the
local buyer, who fears that he may
weigh out" more than he weighs in"
A greater grievance is that at pres
ent the field farmer has little or no
control over the time and conditions
Of marketing his products, with the
result that he is often underpaid for
his products and usually overcharged
for marketing service. The differ
ence between what the farmer re-
ceives and what the consumer pays
often exceeds all possibility Of justi-
fication. To cite single illustration.
Last year, according to figures attest
ed by the railways and the growers,
Georgia watermelon-raisers received
on the average rs cents for a melon,
the railroads got 1927 cents for carry
ing it to Baltimore and the consumer
paid one dollar, leaving 1913 cents for
the service Of marketing and its risks,
as against 2O2 cents for growing and
transporting. The hard annals of
farm-life are replete with such com.
mentaries on the crudeness of pres
ent practices.
Nature prescribes that the farmers
goods" must be finished within two
| or three months Of the year, while
financial and storage limitations gen
orally compel him to sell them at the
same time. As a rule, other industrie.
are in continuous process of finish
Ing goods for the markets; they dis
tribute as they produce, and they car
curtail production without too great
injury to themselves or the commu
nifty; but If the farmer restricts hi.
output, 1t Is with disastrous conse
quences, both to himself and to tn,
community.
The average farmer is busy will
y production for the major part Of tn,
year, and has nothing to sell, Tn,
bulk Of his output comes on the mar
ket at once. Because Of lack of stor
age facilities and Of financial support
the farmer cannot carry his good
through the year and dispose Of then
as they are currently needed. In tn
i great majority Of cases, farmers hav
to entrust storage-in warehouses an
elevators-and the financial carryin
Of their products to others.
i Farm products are generally maj
keted at time when there is q COZ
gestion Of both transportation an
fnance-when cars and money ar
scarce. The outcome, in many ir
stances, Is that the farmers not onl
sell under pressure, and therefore q
a disadvantage, but are compelled t
take further reductions in net return.
in order to meet the charges for tn
service Of storing, transporting, flnan,
: ing, and ultimate interchangeable
charges they claim, are often exec.
sive, bear heavily on both consume
and producer, and are under the co,
troll of those performing the service,
II is true that they are relieved q
the risks Of a changing market b
selling at once but they are quite will