The Bridgeport times and evening farmer., 1922-01-07
SHORT CALENDAR CASES HEARD AT
 SUPERIOR COURT

Judgment was allowed, certified f statements of the amount to be filed by counsel, in the matter of S. Cohen
 & Go. versus Joseph B. Gordon. This motion was acted upon during the i short calendar session of Superior court Friday.
 .counsel as to the amount of judgment V in the case of Israel J. Cohn versus I fne Bridgeport Plumbing Supply com < pany, Inc, Noble avenue.
 Once before postponed for three \ months, a further continuance of a l month was granted in the foreclosure action of George w. Finn against
 An answer or judgment by default f was ordered in two weeks in the case fof David Shuldiner, Inclversus the 4 Bridgeport Glass company, Middle <. street.
 The same motion was granted in 2 the case of Mary Parish versus Ernest ] M. Parish. If no answer is forthcom- ing within that time the case will go on the uncontested list. It is a divorce action.
 Judgment by default will be in or der in two weeks if no answer is filed s in the action of Charles A. Hopwood ! trustee; against Israel M. Plumb.
 A further order of notice was or dered in the pending divorce action of Laura Louise Brown Knudsen, this city; versus Walter Knudsen, last of Toledo. O., and now of parts un- known.
 Two weeks was allowed for filing of @ more specific statement in the case of Maria K. Thompson vs. Anthony Thompson, a pending d1- vorce action.
 Answer in two weeks or judgment by default will be ordered in the suit of the Modern Electric Equipment Co. vs. the City of Bridgeport. An answer on the pleadings. within two weeks, was then ordered in the case of the Columbia Yacht Club vs. the Limited Illuminating Company.
 rOced1IrR fOIl0w ed sn the case of the Stamford Trust Company. for the estate of Andrew J. Bell vs. Charles D. Lockwood. ad- 1ninistrator ct a1s
 A statutory continuance of month was granted in the foreclosure { action of the Equitable Life Assur- against Alfred H. Savory. ct al.
 Attorney Louis A. Kornb1ut, repre- senting Miller & Isaac, Inc, the de- fendant in an action brought by At 4 aorney Joseph Shapiro for Sam Sea- fAato, announced that the defense for his client would be that the agree ment on matter of automobile lia- biIity insurance was made Dec. 3. 4that therefore the agreement had eX- pired. The plaintiff claims that the a agreement ran until Dec 15, and that the accident. causing the action, Happened before the date of expira- tion-s
 The plaintiff Immacolata must file more Sp6clnc statement Tn two tWeeks. The action is a divorce suit Abrought against Pietro Perna.
 A further order of notice by adver- stising in the Chicago Tribune was or dered in the divorce action of Edward AH. Keeler, seeking a decree from Martha w. Keeler, last thought to have resided in the Windy City.
 An answer or judgment by default will be the order in the case of Kittie F. Leeper. versus James J. Dewitt.
 Bonds for prosecution. to the ex- tent of $50 must be filed in two weeks in the case of sam Scadato versus Miller & Isaacs, Inc.
 Attorney Joseph Shapiro suggested @a further order of notice in the New town Bee. in the pending divorce ac- Stion of Mary Schaffer Bellock. seek Ing a decree from David W. Bellocll, X last heard of from Baton Rogue. La, but thought to have friends in New town who may the notice.
 Charles Stuart Garfield was ap- pointed a committee to hear two rases. They are that of James l.. Ash lev versus Alfred Jaretzki; and Han nah s. Miller, against the same de- Pendant.
 Judgment by agreement will be NfIed by Tuesday morning in the ac- Sfion of the Erwin J. Jennings com fpany against James A. Garfield At forney Carl Foster appeared in court Etoday in connection with the case
 An answer on the pleadingS was or dered within two weeks, or judgment by default in the case of Stephen B. Wakenan, versus l. F. Taussig-