Norwich bulletin., 1922-12-04
NUMBER FOUR
Ccontinued from Page oneJ

(Continued from Page one)
 than to aid the department of justice in prosecution of grafters, profteeTs and those who have defrauded the:r
 government during the emergencies of
 war" The department Of justice stands ! ready, Mir. Daugherty said, to meet the demand of Mir. Keller for access to doc
 lNnents bearing upon specific cases
 whenever it IS apparent that neither thg 1 governments interest nor that of indi-i ] viduals who have imposed condolences in the government would be violated. .1n this behalf the statement sum- l marking Mir. Daugherty's reply contin- ued, 'the attorney general said that a mere casual perusal of this demand not
 only ind5cates the motive but reflects
 the character of this entire proceeding | that 1t shows back of this so called pill | of impeachment stand arrayed certain i radical leaders seeking to serve notice
 upon every future attorney general
 that if he dafes enforce the laws of the
 United States against such organiza- i tions he does so under the pain and | penalty Of being haled before the sen= ate of the United States, sitting as a i high court of impeachment under the
 Constitution that it shows that back l Of this so-called bill of impeachment, directing. maintaining and encouraging i it's prosecution, stand arrayed the prof Il iteers. the gfafters, the so-calIed war Il defrauders and all of those who sei5Ed \ upon the opportunity arising from the T emergencies of war to take advantage Il Of their government, that they, by uu- consionable and interruptions means, ! may know what those charged win ], bringing them to the bars of justice have secured as the result Of the most psinstaking, faithful and earnest efforts
 which 1t has been possible for the a-- torney general Of the United States. and ) those associated with him. to give to the solution Of these most confusing , and con1piexihs problems"
 To comply with the demand that evi- . dence in the hands Of the government
 be made public, the attorney general
 l declared, would be highly injurious to
 the interests of the people, in the ozsa
 1 Hcertain important matters now .n
 pfepsration for presentation to the proper tribunals"
 h view of Hthe evident attempt to ! discredit in advance the activities of , the department" the statement said .ithe attorney general eanpot escape Ene conclusion that the sale object and pur-
 pose of this proceeding Is not to remove . him rom of1ee but Is in the nature avovediy of an Attempt . . tc , compel the disclosure ia advance Of the evidence upon which the government re. lies in the in7estigation and prosecutisr of cass ef the sfeatsse inportance t' Tekins up fhe Keller oharyes in order MT. Daueherty's reply stressed the ae tiEities Of the department In anti-trus 2 cases oe which he said 53 had beer filed in the past twenty moutfis. III denied that the department was at tempting to paralyEe the efofts of tn : federal trade commission along sintia : lines. asseft'ng that, in general all sucl suits had been referred to comznissiol . for cooperative action,
 Mf Daughsrty deciarsd t va . charged la substances and effect tha
 the department Of justice and the at.oF s fley general have neglected and re 2 fused to prosecute violatofs of the anti : truH laws, because such violators a- .- controlled by interlocnng difectorate !. throueh the benlking connections of Pierpont Moran and company"
 aTie @ReAicn and insinuaticu ! 1. sought to De conveyed that such viola ]. tors gain immunity through their finau
 cial connections" Mr. Dzaghefty Bast athese insinustioas are as unwzrrante !. as they are unworthy and untrue"
 s1 Refeffing to the charges in eonnec z tion with the Chicago injunction c1sI h tuo 3LbOFuey -Ecnefdi uclouuluM ulB AC !. ton sal dthsk if the committee desire te lheAr the evidence of which the zr s plication for the temporary restrainin . order was made. and would so indicati !. kSeuch fasss and the law feguiaffn s thereto. win bs submitted whenever d ' sired." ' hslaevsf to speeiacatsen one, ees z eefHing fhe A6-ealisd sianbes. cases. M : Pansheftya sald tEese astlsns were ur IS der investiEAtien and that many wef & ready. for prosecution.
 sej..,In reply to specification two. wfiic
 ehasEsd failure ,te prosecute enlawfI - New York State, the attorney generi
 declared that 3h important list
 flames of alleged viplat6es was in tf g possession Of samuel Uhtsrmyer, copI ne sel for the Lo4t26od ifssstieatlf q committee, wh6 had failed to tfahsn c. IA to t1o deparinI-it & as A fhof51sh t1tsiibh. ghe rsbi |.