The Washington times., 1922-06-17

main In the air without material sup
port. But the aeroplane Is now
/ with us. They also said that tho
tallow candle was the best lighting
system ever. but they didn't know
Edison would change things for
them.
And now they say sex cannot be
predetermined, and they who do
not know and never before heard,
say neither sex nor vocation can be
determined before the birth Of o
child"
How nice Il would be 10 tho queen
who wished to give an heir to her
kingdom could predetermine the
birth OF a male child into the world.
and II any woman could please her
family by presenting them with lit
tie girl, for example. But would
such private and personal choosing
on the part OF individuals upset
nature? DR.. Lucas says not.
Nature would be upset. DIR. ouack-
enbos declares, II parents could de-
eide how many boys and girls they
would add to the population OF the
world, but DR.. Lucas defends his
own theories:
Cannot Upset Nature.
Neither two persons nor two
billion people, or more. can upset
nature. II nature could be upset,
surely the degenerate blending OF
human inertia. the sick. tho Grip
pied, the insane Of the past or OF
the present conditions Of mankind
would have, or would today. upset
her. The war that killed our men
and left our women conditioned in
melancholy and in insanity has not
upset nature. Again. even though
some families had all boys and others
all girls, upon the face Of this argu-
ment. 1t would prove an equilibrium.
mostly. Of the sexes and not an up
setting Of nature.
THE normal mothers and the
normal fathers Of different families
would predetermine first q girl be-
cause a girl always should come to
the home before q boy. and then a
boy, and then a girl. and a boy and
SO on to a family of four and not
| est family, In the superior home.
My origiSAl method in regulating
the family precludes the use Of drugs
will have no more children because
u
family. We wish now to give our
like to go into details and explain
positively predetermine the sex as
well as inform you about the pre-.
vocation of children.
Transmission Of Love.
"The greatest need today 10 the
ty-ov a9v,af faa ~ .,xA A.
to our progeny. Fur too many love.
less children, many of whom are
deformed and degenerate, thronR
and prisons and asyIums.
And II mothers can influence a
child to be beautiful why cannot she
cause It to become superior in the
mental and physical aspects Of its
nature7
"As for sex, can point to
come to this earth predetermined
in sex. I win state that our own
little girl. Marguerite vivianne
Lucas, and our little boy, Alzamon IRA
Lucas, the second, were both pre-.
sexed and pre-vocationally deter.
mined. The girl Ia of the artistic
and musical type and the boy IA
of the philosophical and scientific
type My sole object In exhibiting
our children is to prove our
theories.
"I have said that II REQUIRES
twenty-seven months for the best
results In preparing the body,
mind and soul Of both parents In
order to predetermine the sex of
| the child. Science IN slow To az.
oept new, even though proven,
theories. Many person have MANY
times proved their assertions. hui
not until hundreds Of years after
their death did science accept their
claims" =
Would women, We wonder. be
pleased 10 select the ser Of their
children or is n diverting when
one wants q hoy % draw Q giri or
vice versaf The opinions Of women
would be quito N interesting. n not
moro 20. ON this subject than the
medical profeszion's vfcw.