The Powder River County examiner and the Broadus independent. [volume] (Broadus, Mont.) 1919-1935, 1922-09-22

cherrsa the actual expense must bt
Slain Slams 81. BY outside parties. similar t
GiC43nty Commissioner, $500" Thii
em impos. 81 the se Determine dsw 1ro
y yas what, when or where the service
s Was rendered nSs red or the rate Of compen.
as COULD be determined, these Claims
were FOR bringing Commissioner Morris
Glazing ano from meetings and from other
actually trave lGand wa that the he, distarce
aw rst aiiows the members Of the Board
in how thav the e,, county is not interested
psnse the same. # Would Cd t appe ear
xnat this payment and others Of a sim
amount aliewe are bv n Nv e. gee Of the
the case and this claim w was fo ucn th '
service service az above mentioned, the ex.
reSs aoove the ten cents per mile
1"ust ne refunded forthwith
sign It in the name Of The nrincinsi
officer by himself az such deputy. pA'
Claim No. 34ts Of G. M. Smith does
Was 1 ren%er the date that such service
nc Claim AIM: No; s4a7 ts not fully itemized.
snecti on ..,e IN what capacity such In
'' claim w. Ees s nae of Morgan Elliott
an termination. not showing the date
c Hi1iant's ~, f9 s4so ID Jacob VOICE.
Ts is assigned to osa Force and thss
SanR withcat to fSr the e essss
&c, Claim No. s457 of J: H. Morris reads
would K Be not psoHisIiy tented and t
determine whether or nc not a Such one Servo 70
Ice. was rendered since there ere" il el NO
date shown nor does it show what
.o clsm %s Ne sass 81 c. M Smith j, nrac
Claims No. 1855 and ss7s and others
t tor stamps We're paid out of the con-
fund.
Claim No. 1866 for stamps is subject
10 the same criticism and also shows
no no a 9a a ina IN fact Is not even signed
Claim No. 1853 Of J. H. Morrt. does
not show the date and is not item
sseo mieht mean da almost a's ' ang
thing. Furthermore it is not signed
in NJ Gi5S. to n s so h,e sssss
$500" II. does not show the purpose
OF this trip and If there was no pur-.
r pose &c It must be borne in mind that
anyone $500 for merely coming to
Claim NO. ss72 of Baxter Pierce is
date of service fully not showing the
Claim No. 1887. reading merely
SALARY 10000" is not properly item,
lied. not showing the service rem
All claims for salaries or supplies
furnished should be approved by the
head of the department receiving the
Claim No. 3405 to G. c. Craw. read
NSrf with With s ao DATE
All claims for Temporary relief such
as No. 3472 should be signed the same
as any ys other C claim i,a.,u.. p.n.,o
be up, to the lawful requirements and
signed by the claimant. the same as
other claims. None Of the claims now
which the allowance was made.
Claim No. 3477 is signed by the No
tary Public. Carrie. Crane. but has not
aaite Unusual Ssn 70 flnd an aeknewledees
out being signed by the party:
expenses Tor a trip to Miles City, is
not itemized
Claim No: 1920 Of n. 4: Burkey for
than Re ssss as qis Il does
even show what he investigated, or
where. merely showing lump sum
for car fare Sr and gd Of $SSo
Aug. Observation-Disclosures. $1,000"
This is certainly very. remarkable
claim but It Is hard to imagine how
as to termination.
Several claims such n az s+sa stss
Section aoa Hp Of the ef Revised s' Codes.
which provide that such, payments
must be made from the classification
Claim No. ss2s of J. H. Morris is
practically the same as claim 1921.
20 whom such service was rendered.
The salary of the. Health OFFICER
should be. paid from the general fund. |
paid from the contingent fund are
hose of the regularly elected officers |
and the deputies that are allowed by
sxtra deputies should be paid from the
st Claims 1857 $50. ss7,. s747 and other.
ths .ams s %oss
per mile should be refunded to the
The claim Of the commissioners for
per diem are very incomplete, most Of
meeting. $4,000" no dates Being
Claim No. 1864 reading. For ex.
pense incurred in Investigations and |
gathering evidence for September and |
3 te%i.si 1891 sl74.oo." is not properly
The practice of making a flat al
owance as was done in the case Of c. |
]. Rutterf1eld, Is not to he commended. |
It IL better to furnish the necessary
supplies and pay for them in the u.s.
Claim No. 1911 of c. NJ. Smith for ex-
pense investigating Mothers Pension |
cases: reading in part, Expense $500
per day, $780," is not properly item
I xed: An expense claims should be
!ul,y itemised and it would also be
we'll to- have receipts attached to the |
lain Tor all expenses in excess of |
Claim No. 1912 Of J. H. Morris does
not show the year Of service or what |
service was performed and further
more an expense claim as "Hotel Elk
,es $780," certainly cannot be toll
=. Claim No: ss4s is very similar to
Claim No. $3.50 of John I. westphal
or transporting coroner is not legal |
charge against the county. The cor.
oner receives ten cents per mile for
PuPthoP than thia the Ooe,ntxy a roA d.