The evening world., 1922-05-20
CORTLAND.

CORTLAND.
MANY DEMOCRATS ABSOLUTELY
REFUSE TO SUPPORT HEARST.
BY Telegraph to the Editor Of The Evening
World.
CORTLAND, May 20.
No Hearst sentiment in Cortland
County. No effort to my knowledge
10 generate 1t. Many Democrats here
absolutely refuse to support Hearst
for any ohlce.-W. w. HARRING-
TON.
DELAWARE.
HHARsT IS NOT REGARDED AS A
REAL DEMOCRAT.
D. Telegraph to the Editor of The Evening
World.
WALTON, May 90
No Hearst sentiment here nor effort
TO organize it. Hearst not regarded
ks Democrat and would not get party
vote in Delaware County.-EDWARD
9, WHITE
ESSEX.
LITTLE SENTIMENT FOR PUB-
Usher IN ESSEX COUNTY.
fBy Telegraph to the Editor OF The Evening
World.)
TICONDEROGA, May 20.
No real Hearst sentiment in Essex
County. No attempt to organize or
create sentiment except by small cir
culation of Peoples Advocate and
Copners's editorials. l doubt that the
Democrats of this county would sup
port Hearst for Governor.
ROY LOCKWOOD.
GREENE.
HAS HEARD OF NO REAL HEARST
SENTIMENT.
BY Telegraph to the Editor of The Evening
CATSKILL, May 20.
Have not heard OF any real Hearst
sentiment in Greene County. Don't
know OF any Hearst organization in
Che county. Cannot state how the
Democrats would feel about him as
have made no inouiries.-J. j.
O'HARA.
HAMILTON.
SAYS THAT MANY DEMOCRATS
WOULD OPPOSE HEARST.
By Telegraph to the Editor of The Evening
World
WELLS, May 20.
No Hearst sentiment in Hamilton
County. Many Democrats say they
would not support him If nominated
carl L. FRY.
HERklMER.
STRONG OPPOSITION REPORTED
FROM LITTLE FALLS.
BY telegraph to the WI3Sa Editor of The Evening
LITTLE FALLS, May 20.
No sentiment in Herkimer County
for Hearst for Governor, but very
strong opposition. - WILLIAM II.
NOLAN.
JEFFERSON
Would Bolt Hearst as in 1906, Says
McCartin.
GTeleSraph TO the Editor OF The Evening
WATERFOWL, May 10.
Absolutely no Hearst sentiment here
The Democrats would bolt Hearst in
the same manner that they did in
1906 when Jefferson County delegates
were unseated at Buffalo convention.
G. S. McCARTIN.
IGWIOs
SOLID FOR AL SMITH, NO VOTE
FOR PUBLISHER.
GBy Telegraph to the Editor OF The Evening
LoWVILLE. May 20.
There is no Hearst sentiment here
In Lewis County. nor no vote for
Hearst. Lewis County would be solid
for AL Smith.
PETER M'GovERN.
. LIVINGSTON.
AL SMITH MOST FAVORED IN LIv-
INGSTON COUNTY.
(By Telegraph to The Evening world)
GENESEO. May 20.
Very little Hearst sentiment in
Livingston County, and to my knowl-
edge nothing being done for him. Al
Smith seems most favored
NJ. L. GAMBLE.
MADISON.
WOULD PREFER MAYOR LUNN OR
JUDGE IRVING.
BY Telegraph to the Editor of The Evening
World
ONEIDA, May 90
It there IS any sentiment in Madison
County in favor OF Hearst it is not
apparent. If we can't have Smith
from New York City we would prefer
Mayor Lunn or Judge Irving from up
State.-OTTO PFAFF.
MONTGOMERY.
DOES NOT THINK THERE Is ANY
HEARST SENTIMENT.
BY Telegraph to the Editor of The Evening
World.
CANAJOHARIE, May 20.
Do not think there is any Hearst
sentiment In Montgomery County. No
orginzation that l know of.-MENZO
ENGLAND.
NIAGARA.
WOULD OPPOSE ANY MOVE TO
NAME HEARST.
By Telegraph to the Editor OF The Evening
World.
NORTH TONAWANDA, May 20.
There Is no real Hearst sentiment
in this county and know of no effort
being made to organize for him. Nj