The St. Mary banner., 1922-06-03

said election, and dld Hnd Indt Lle
number of votes for and against SAID
three propositions submitted were as
follows:
PROPOSITION No. 1.
Total number of votes in favor OF
Proposition No. l, submitted as !
aforesaid, ONE HUNDRED AND
TWO (102)
The amount in value of assessed
property voted in favor of PROPOSE
ton No. 1. submitted as aforesaid,
FIVE HUNDRED AND THIRTY
FIVE THOUSAND, ONE HUNDRED
AND FIFY-NINE & 37-100 1885,
15e37) DOLLARS.
Total number of votes cast against
Proposition No. 1, submitted as
aforesaid, one D
Total amount in assessed value Of
property voted against Proposition
No. l.. submitted as aforesaid,
THREE THOUSAND AND TWEN-
Y-SEVEN & 63-1O0 ($3,02763)
DOLLARS.
Majority in number Of taxpayers
in favor of Proposition No. l one
hundred and one (10D
Majority in value of assessed pro-
nertv in favor Of Proposition No. l,
I FIVE HUNDRED AND THIRTY
TWO THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED
AND THIRTY-ONE & 74-100
| 1882, ,131.74 DOLLARS.
PROPOSITION No. 2.
Total number of votes in favor of
Proposition No. 2, submitted as
aforesaid, one hundred and two (102)
The amount in value of assessed
property voted in favor of PROPOSE
ton No. 2, submitted as aforesaid.
FIVE HUNDRED AND THIRTY
FIVE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED
AND FIFTY NINE & 37-100 1885,
15937) DOLLARS.
Total number of votes cast against
Proposition No. 2, submitted as
aforesaid, one (D
Total amount in assessed value OF
property voted against Proposition
No. 2, submitted as aforesaid,
THREE THOUSAND AND TWEEN
TY-SEVEN & 63-100 ($3,O27.63)
DOLLARS.
Majority in number of taxpayers in
favor of Proposition No. 2, one hun
dred and one 101)
|
property in favor of Proposition No.
2, FIVE HUNDRED AND THIRTY
TWO THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED
AND THIRTY-ONE & 74-100 ($532.-
131.74) DOLLARS.
PROPOSITION No. 8.
Total number of votes in favor of
Proposition No. 8, submitted as
aforesaid, one hundred and one (1O1l
The amount in value of assessed
property voted in favor of PROPOSE
lion No. 8, submitted as aforesaid,
FIVE HUNDRED. AND THIRTY
! ONE THOUSAND NINE HUMID
RED AND THIRTY-NINE & 37-1OO
1851 ,939.37) DOLLARS.
Total number Of votes cast against
Proposition No. 3, submitted as
aforesaid, two (2).
| Total amount in assessed value of
property voted against Proposition
No. 3, submitted as aforesaid, SIX
THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED AND
FORTY-SEVEN & 63-100($6, 247 .63)
DOLLARS.
Majority in number Of taxpayers in
favor of Proposition No. 3, ninety
nine (e9).
Majority in value of assessed pro-
perty in favor of Proposition No. 5.
FIVE HUNDRED AND TWENTY
FIVE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED
AND NINETY ONE & 74-10O $685.
SOL. .74) DOLLARS.
Therefore, it appearing that Prop
| osition No. l, Proposition No. 2 and
| Proposition No. 8, and each of said
| propositions, were duly and legally
| carried by majority both in mum
| bers and amounts, of all taxpayers
If said Town of Franklin, La, quail
fed to vote at said election under
the Constitution and laws of this
| state, participating in said election,
as shown by the inspection examina-
ton, comparison and canvass of the
| votes cast at said election, as we'll
| as the sworn returns of the Com
| missioners and Clerk presiding at
said election, which we found to be
| correct, do accordingly ratify said
| returns of said election and approve
same and declare that said PROPOSE
tion No. |, said Proposition No. q
and said Proposition No. 3, and each
Of said propositions, has and have
! been carried both in number Of votes
and assessed valuation of property,
and we do accordingly make public
! proclamation of the result.
Thus done and signed, in triplicate.
| in open session at Franklin, St. Mary
| Parish, La, in the presence of the
assembly and the undersigned COM
| petent witnesses, on this 1st. day of
June, 1922.
C. AUCOIN, CHARLES LAUvE,
Secretary. Mayor
Present: