The Challis messenger. (Challis, Idaho) 1912-current, 1922-10-11
H|| is! {! 3! !: 9!

den's daughter by his first wife, were
the only persons in the house at the
time the murders were discovered, and
the stepdaughter, as Bridget had not
the slightest motive for the crime.
After breakfast, on the morning OF
August 4, 1893, Mr.. Borden left the
house to attend to an errand in the
neighborhoOd, and Mrs. Borden went
upstairs to arrange the guest room in
preparation for some expected visitors.
Mrs. Borden, as was afterwards
brought out at the trial, left the first
floor at $3.50, and it was the last time
that she was seen alive.
Both Lizzie and Bridget Sullivan
were Ia the kitchen at ten o'clock
when Mr.. Borden returned to tho
house, and, finding the front door
the only other entrance-lOcked. came
In through the back way and went up
to his room which communicated only
with the back part of the house and
could not be reached from the front.
1t was about fifteen minutes later that
Lizzie Borden went upstairs. and II
moment later, shrieked out that her
father had been killed. Both the old
man and his wife had been murdered.
practically chopped to pieces, for
there were no lest than tweniy-nine
wounds on the two bodies, while the
rooms in which they were' found were
spattered with b'Dod almost to the
ceiling. Investigation shoNad that
Mrs. Borden. whose body was dis
covered In the guest room, had been
struck down while Lizzie Borden was
talking to the servant on the fir~f
door, only short time before; while
Mr.. Borden had had time only to reach
his room before being felied by
blow that severed his skull.
In spite of the lack of evitlet re
against her, Lizzie Borden was ar.
rested and charged with the two mar
ders-but was acquitted on the first
ballot of the jury, as 1t was shown
that 1t would have been impossible
for her to have killed her step-mother
changed her bloOd-spattered clothes.
returned to the first floor where she
talked to Bridget Sullivan for half
an hour. and then to have gone up
stairs, killed her father and again
change her clothes before giving the
alarm, to say nothing Of dispOsng of
the weapon which she had used.
On the other hand. as the ErOsecu.
ton pointed out. there was ne other
person who possessed both the motive
and the opportunity. Lizzie Borden
had quarreled with her stnirmOther
some time before. Her fathers will
left the major portion of hls property
to his wife, unless he survived her.
In which case 1t was to go to his
daughter. The front door and all the
windows on the first floor had been
locked. Therefore no one could enter
without passing through the kitchen,
where both Bridget Sullivan and Lizzie
Borden were at work. Finally Lizzie
Borden had discovered the crime
which at once led to the suspicion that
she had committed 1t. But even the
counsel for the state had to admit that
the blood-spattered walls and the to
tai lack of any blood stains on Miss
Bordens clothing presented an In.
surmountable obstacle. so far as her
guilt was concerned.
Her acquittal however. not only
added another classic TO the mysteries
of crime but presented two questions
apparently impossible of solution by
any reasonable hypothesis: How had
the murderer entered the house when
the only available entrance was
through the kitchen where the two
women were working? How had he
managed to commit two crimes of this
nature and escape, With clothing which
was certain to have been thoroughly
blood STAINED. without attracting the
slightest notice?