South Bend news-times. (South Bend, Ind.) 1913-1938, 1922-09-20

AA A~HA aaaa same ifsA l4A-aAn
Yes"
Lengthy Legal Argument.
AT this Juncrure a lengthy legal
argument followed az % the lie
~ questioning. ar. Jeluson inter
posed that the defense might ask
III they used the family silverware.
Mr. Parker explained that the ques-
tloning was 10 show the relationship
existing between Prof. Herman and
his wife during that period OF time
when she was meeting Poulin Sc
-re-Iy and ccnsorting with him
Judge DuComb sustained Mr.. Par
ber.
"In short you used everything IN
common about the house just as YOU
bad used 3, before Jan. /. didn't
your
$50. I did not"
with what difference ?"
we did not occupy the same
beds"
Very good But you observed
y0ur wifely duties. you carried out
sour work in taking care Of the
house o"
Yes"
You made the beds and took
care Of his clothes and that sort
OF thing?"
Yes"
Now then you had quarreIs.
didn't you"
Lots Of them
"You quarreied before Jan. y"
Il guess So"
Now then. you had as many
quarrels after Jan. i as befOre?"
does Not Answer.
The witness dld not answer.
They were about as frequent
weren't they
Yes"
You didn't know Poulin ut the
time the second child was born ?"
"No"
you testified you had trouble
when or after the second child was
born. What was there about the
birth Of the second child that caused
trouble I'm the family?''
The question was unanswered.
Didn't Mr.. Herman and you nave
trouble because he charged the sec
ond child was not his"
mo. he cid not. You better stop
that.
'NVas there anything wrong with
your husbands health in January
and February ?"
mo. Not that know off"
you wrote POu,n some letters
after Jan. is, 1922"
yes, and ne wrote me some"
Hands Her Letter.
MIR. Parker handed her a letter
andthe witness said. He told me
TO burn mine"
You recollect writing POulin n
this letter and telling him you
thought YOU could make your hus-
band believe that he was the faith
er OF This child p" she was asked
Another legal difference existed
bat Mrs. Herman was allowed 20
answer the question.
eyes Read the whole letter
won't you2"
A few more questions and Mr..
Parker concluded his Cross examlna-
ton.
on redirect examination, Mr.
Jellisou went over previous testl-
mony concerning the time when
they attended a party and Poulin
bantered Mrs. Herman that he
could Kiss her.
when Mrs POulin came 10 see
YOU after she had been to Chicago
you say she came in a taxicab 3"
yes. sir"
What did she say2"
The defense objected ard TIT
court sustained the motion
Was she smiling
"No."
was She crying"
Yes. at times"
did she talk about Mr. Pouii,.
Did she discuss YOU and Mr.. PoU
I'm? Talk about YOU both some q.
the time o."
eyes sir"
Testimony Stricken out.
The questions and answers wer
stricken out because Of ;he cour
ruling chat the conversation coUN
no bind the defendant
Did YOU tell anyone else pro
vious .c Jan. s. 1929 hat HaTr.
Pouun was the father OF you
child
The question went unanswere,
when the court sustained anotho
objection
Did you call up Mrs. Poulin7"
"Nes. sir.
who answered the telephone. q?
AIR P0u.n"
A few questions as TO whom tn
baby was named after concluded III
examination
Prof. Herman then took the stand
After the preliminary QuestiCnin
his testimony follows.
Are you a married mane'
Yes. sir"
When were you married %
April 10 1915"
"Is Augusta Tiernau. the lady VII
jus, left the stand, your Wife,"
Yes. SIR"
10 YOU know where Harry Pou
..n lves7"
Eyes sir. 225 y. s. Louis blvd.
you reside in the northwest par
- the city Have YOU both live
So chose Two houses for sewers
years.
Ell should say. approximately thre
years
"How long have you known Har
- PCulin o"
To my best recollection a5ou
Two years.
First Meeting.
do you recall where you me
him the first time ."
AT a dance
You met his wife ?"
Yes"
The two families becam
.