The Richmond palladium and sun-telegram. [volume] (Richmond, Ind.) 1907-1939, 1922-09-05

On this the 28th day' of August 1922 at ten
o'clock A. NJ, this cause came on for hearing on
the application of The Chesapeake and Ohio Rail-
way Company, complainant above named, for
preliminary Injunction, as prayed for IN the COM
plant in said cause and appearing to the Court
from the writ of subpoena, and notice duly issued
in said cause and the return of the United States
Marshal on said writ and on the notice so issued,
that due notice of the filing and tendency of this
cause, and Of the time and place Of this hearing
on the application of said complainant for pre-
1imnary injunction in said cause, has been given
to the following persons named as defendants in
said cause:
H Griner Chairman Strike ComnEttee F. Salt
ers, Local Chairman of Blacksmiths, NJ Young,
Chairman of Boilermakers and Helpers, John
Beason Hazel Palladium, Joe Loveland, Gladys
Gibson, William Rented, George Morris, NJ s.
Waite, G. NJ Carfrae P. Cunningham, L. ZippeTian,
John Penn, Ruth Naughton L. c. Patheal, Clyde
Clifford, B. Brauneller c. A. Means Vice-Chair-
of the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship
Clerks Freight Handlers, Express and Station
Employees R. r. Miller, Local Chairman of Machin-
lists, A. F. Lapp, Local Chairman Sheet Metal
Workers, Charles Schmidt, Local Chairman OF
Car Men, Charles Lee, Local Chairman of Elec-
trical Workers, c. V. Greenwald, Local Chairman
of Machnists Helpers, G.. A. Means, R. R. Miller,
A. F. Lapp, Charles Schmidt, Charles Lee, c. "
Greenwald, Thomas McCarty, A. E. Miller, Lee
Aldridge, Emery Dunnick, w. F. Petty L. S.
Dipple. E. L. Rufe, ]. H. Berker, c. McCalla Will
liam Rohrburg, c. Rohrburg, j. S. Chamberlain,
J. A Murphy Charles Kurz, F. J. Mulcahy, E E.
Lantz, F. P. Quick, William Deem, Jr., c. j.
Becker Thomas Doute, E. K. Smith, George But
zin F. E. Cole Charles Smallwood l.. B. Charters,
NJ. H. Kantzer, c. E. Beauchamp, F. w Williams,
o. E. Miller, w A. Ream, Fern Marley, Glenn
Hilgeman, Russell Marley, R. B. Miller, Carl
Koontz, Nathan Prince, OrvaI Sonafrank, George
Holerman, Roy Waymeyer, Charles Schmidt v
Wilkinson, Harry Haimer, Clarence Vopert Grace
Roberts, Carl Stencil D. Griswold, S. w. Lewis,
K Ashebrook, and l.. Dagnan, all of whom reside
in Miami County Indiana; and thereupon Frank
D. Butler, attorney for said defendants so
served resident in Miami County, Indiana enters
his appearance for and on their behalf and con-
sented for and on behalf of said defendants to
the granting of the preliminary injunction as
prayed for in the complaint in said cause.
And it further appearing to the Court from the
writ of subpoena and notice. so duly issued in
said cause, and the return of the United States
Marshal said writ and notice so issued that
due notice of the filing and tendency of this
cause, and of the time and place of this hearing
on the application of said complainant for prelim
mary injunction in said cause has been given
to the following persons named as defendants in
said
D. E. Martin, Phillip Witt, George Wesley. J.
O. Smith, c. F. Eaveny, Cash Bennett, A. c. Con-
ner, ]. S. Ambrose, w. R. Short, A. T. Ketron, w
E Williams, J. T Staten, G. T. Packer, Guy
HanIey, Ralph Taylor, w P. Chrisman, w B. Brat
ton, Carl Brosworth Carl Kigus, w. B. Sim
mons, Marke Pyle, Cecil Marley, John Smith,
George Bennett Ben Smith. V. Overholser, P.
Harkleroad, H J. Filby, z. l.. Farnsworth. Henry
Eggemeyer, Ruth Jones, NJ. J. Kimball, Louis
Witte, William Ross, Herbert Kohurst, Leslie
Sims, Arthur Ross, Roy Brattain, E w. Ambrose,
Alph E. Kutter, J. l. Ballenger, Stephen Alexander
Douglass Druley, c. E. Harrison, F. T. Stanley,
H. w Beck, E. Robbins w. D. Benner, P NJ Muir
ray, ]. Long, R. Lashley, R. w. Stanley, H w.
Farnsworth, L. E. Mitchell, H Sitlow, w McClain,
R. ]. Um, Fred Kilgas, w. c. Howard, R. n. Hol-
der, H. Salyer Earl Miller, George Harkleroad,
Sam Hopkins, Roscoe Braden, J. Gender and
Charles Watson, all of whom reside in Wayne
County, Indiana; and thereupon said above named
defendants resident of Wayne County, Indiana
are each duly called in open court but come not,
but herein wholly make default
This cause is submitted on the application
Of Complainant herein for preliminary injunction
And the Court having heard the evidence and
being fully advised in the premises, finds that acts
of violence have been perpetrated by defendants
and others affiliated acting combining conspir-
ing, agreeing and arranging with them; that de
PENDANTS, unless enjoined, will continue said acts
of violence assaults, trespasses and picketing to
compliments immediate and irreparable loss and
damage; that compliments property, its lines of
railroad and particularly it's shops and equipment
located in the State of Indiana likely to be
seriously damaged if defendants not restrained
and enjoined from performing said acts that
there is imminent and immediate danger that the
operation of compliments trains in interstate
commerce, and in the performance of its duties
a common carrier will be interfered with, i'm
peded, intern tied and delayed and that there is
imminent and immediate danger that the carrying
of the United States mails by complainant will be
interfered with, interrupted delayed and thai
a preliminary injunction should issue, enioiniHa
and restraining the defendants from performing
any of said acts and that complainant is entitled
to such preliminary injunction against the defend
ants.
NOW, THEREFORE, 1T IS ORDERED thai
you and each of you, the defendants herein named
and all other persons affiliated acting, co-operat
ing confederating, combining, conspiring, agree
ing arranging with you be restrained from il
any manner interfering with hindering, obstruct
ing stopping the business of the complainant OF
its agents, servants employees in the mainte
nance, conduct or operation of its business; from
preventing attempting to prevent any person
or persons by threats intimidations, force or vic
1ence from entering into or continuing in the com
planants service; from in any manner agreeini
combining or conspiring together or injure o
destroy, hinder interfere with or obstruct tn
business of the complainant, its officers, agents 0
employees from compelling inducing a
tempting to compel or induce by threats, intim
dations, force, violence, fraud deception, an
person now in the employ of the complainant t
cease performance of his duties or to fail or n
fuse to enter or continue in it's service; froI
commanding directing permitting any pc
son under the control of the said defendants c
any of them to interfere with prevent
threats intimidations, fraud or violence any pc
son from entering continuing in the emplo
ment of the complainant; from in any manner
in any way whatsoever by the use of threats (
personal injury intimidation or suggestion {
danger or threats of violence of any kind hinde
ing, obstructing or interfering with any person
the employ Of the complainant in going to or fro