The Powder River County examiner and the Broadus independent. [volume] (Broadus, Mont.) 1919-1935, 1922-07-21
III

are subjected to stern economic lee
lures, and are met with the accusation
that they are demanding, and are the
recipients of, special privileges. Let
US see what privileges the government
has conferred on the farmers. Much
has been made Of Section Of the
Clayton Antitrust Act, which pur-
ported to permit them to combine with
immunity, under certain conditions.
Admitting that, nominally, this ex-
emption was In the nature Of q special
privilege.-though think It was so in
appearance rather than in fact,-we
find that the courts have nullified It
by judicial Interpretation. Why should
not the farmers be permitted to &C.
complish by cooperative methods what
other businesses are already doing by
cooperation In the form of incorpora.
ton? If 1t be proper for men to form,
by fusion Of existing corporations or
otherwise, a corporation that controls
the entire production Of a commodity,
or large part Of it, why Is 1t not
proper for group Of farmers to unite
for the marketing Of their common
products, either in one or in several
selling agencies? Why should it be
right for hundred thousand corporate
shareholders to direct Is or 80 or 40
per cent Of an industry, and wrong for
hundred thousand cooperative
farmers to control a no larger proper
ton Of the wheat crop. or cotton, or
any other product?
The Department Of Agriculture Is
often spoken Of as special concession
to the farmers, but In its commercial
results, 1t Is Of as much benefit to the
buyers and consumers Of agricultural
products as to the producers, or even
more. do not suppose that anyone
opposes the benefits that the farmers
derive from the educational and re-
search work of the department, or the
help that it gives them in working out
improved cultural methods and prac-
tees, in developing better yielding va
rieties through breeding and selection,
In introducing new varieties from re-
mote parts Of the world and adapting
them to our climate and economic con.
dition, and in devising practical meas.
ures for the elimination or control Of
dangerous and destructive animal and
plant diseases. insect pests and the
like. All these things manifestly tend
to stimulate and enlarge production,
and their general beneficial effects are
obvious.
It Is complained that, whereas the
law restricts Federal Reserve banks
to three months time for commercial
paper, the farmer Is allowed six
months on his notes. This Is not a
special privilege, but merely such a
recognition Of business conditions as
makes 1t possible for country banks
to do business with country people
The crop farmer has only one turn.
over year. while the merchant and
manufacturer have many. Incidental
~, note that the Federal Reserve
Board has just authorized the Fed.
eral Reserve banks to discount export
paper for a period Of six months, to
conform to the nature of the bust
ness.
The Farm Loan banks are pointed
to as an instance of special govern.
ment favor for farmers. Are they not
rather the outcome Of laudable efforts
to equalize rural and urban condi.
tions2 And about all the government
does there Is to help set up an ad-
ministrative organization and lend q
little credit at the start. Eventually
the farmers will provide all the capt.
tai and carry all the liabilities them.
T. kh0< 10
bonds are tax exempt; but so are
bonds of municipal light and traction
plants, and new housing Is to be ex-
empt from taxation, in New York, for
ten years.
On the other hand, the farmer reads
Of plans for municipal housing prof.
ects that run into the billions. Of hun.
dreds Of millions annually spent on
tho merchant marine; he reads that
the railways are being favored with
increased rates and virtual guarantees
Of earnings by the government, with
the result to him Of an increased toll
on all that he sells and all that he
buys. He hears Of many manifesto.
lions of governmental concern for par.
uCUk0X luuUSlIlCS 0uV lutSICStS, lt8S.
cuing the railways from insolvency In
undoubtedly for the. benefit Of the
country % whole, but what can be
Of more general benefit than encour.
agement Of ample production Of the
principal necessaries Of life and their
even fl0w from cOntented producers to
satisfied consumers1
While Il may be conceded that
special governmental aid may be nee.
essary In the general interest, we must
al agree that It Is difficult to see why
agriculture and the production and dis.
tribution Of farm psoducts are not &C
corded the same opportunities that arr
provided for other businesses; espe.
cially % the enjoyment by the farmer
Of such opportunities would appear t.