River Falls journal. [volume] (River Falls, Pierce County, Wis.) 1872-2019, 1922-12-28

sented by Sup Park and the vote on
the several propositions was as i na1is
Gated therein and as the roll calls
show as follows:
Proposition No. ayes: Richards.
Olson, Howe, Frank, Williams, Dodge'
johnson, Brownlee, Cotter, Park Gieb-
gren, n. w. Larson, Hanson, Hans
Larson, Paulson, Manfred, Stebnitz,
Hartman. Smith, Weeks, Nelson, GlIles,
Mcdonald, Manion, Reynolds, Eliertson
(16 votes).
Proposition No. Adopted unani-
mously, all members voted aye l29
votes).
Proposition No. S-Ayes: Young
Paulson, Manfred, Olson. Hartman,
Smith, Weeks, Howe, Frank, Williams.
ter, Park, GiebIer, Mcdonald, Fielder,
Manion, Reynolds. Ellertson l25 votes);;
Noes. Hanson, Stebnitz, Nelson Is
votes).
gren, N w. Larson Hanson, Hans Lar
son, Richards, Paulson, Manfred, OIL
son Hartm5aan SMITH Weeks nodge H 5oSn
son, Browniee, Cotter, Park. GiebleJr,;
MeDonala Fieal ern,tv El Na,san Maa GA
ion, Reynolds a votes).
gren, n. W. Larson, Hanson, Paulson,
Manfred, Olson, Smith, Howe ellis,
PsaEe cis sSerson rSGh fedler
iertson us votes). Noes: Hans Lar
son. Richards stsbnitz, Hartman,
M Msaks Reynolds sTaad 90 S1 Notesp NeS0
Proposition No. ayes: Olson. Gil
PARK. Giebler McDo Taad.. E Ee1ng
gren, n. W, Larson HANSON, Hans Lar
son. Richards, Paulson, Manfred, Steb-
nitz, Hartman, Smith, Weeks, Howe,
Frank, Williams, Nelson, Reynolds. Ell
iertson ct votes).
Proposition No. 7--Ayes:, Young
gren. N. w. Larson, Hanson, Hans Lar
son, Richards, Paulson, Manfred, Olson,
Williams, Nelson, Gillis, Dodge. John
son, Brownlee, lCotter, Park, GIebler,
Mcdonald, Fielder, Reynolds. Ellert,
Manion G. votes).
Proposition No. 8--Ayes: Young
gren. Hanson, Hans Larson, Richards,
Paulson, Manfred. Olson; Hartm ian
ter, Park. Giebier. Fielder. Manion,
Esrtaon ste as Eotei Nelson Noes
Reynolds 6 votes).
PROPOSED FORM OF RESOLUTIONS
FOR SUBMISSION TO COUNTY
BOARDS OF WISCONSIN,
NOVEMBER, 1929
Whereas, the County Board of Pierce
County has carefully. considered the
in wisconsin and has discussed the
report and recommendations of the
sin County Boards Association, as con-
tanned in Highway Pamphlet No. l OF
said Association; and
Whereas, The said County Board has
considered the several main PROPOSE
tons contained in said recommends
lions separately. and has approved OF,
by the votes herein given, as follows:
Proposition No. /: This county
board favors the addition of $500 miles
to the State Trunk Highway System
of Wisconsin to be maintained and
roadmarked by the State, commencing
in 1924. this addition to relieve the
counties of the maintenance of $500
miles of their most important roads
in addition to the $500 miles now
maintained by the state.
The vote on this proposition was IL
ayes and 16 noes.
Proposition No. 2: This county
board fa,vors the saving of the federal
sin and those hereafter to be made
available, so that Wisconsin may. re-
ceive back its proper share of these
by national imposts and taxation
The vote on this proposition was 20
ayes and no noes.
Proposition No. 81 This county
Of ali except the the F Fd Governmen 1
share of the cost of federal aid con-
struction; relieving. the counties of
PD3AAS the Ofe-LltI0 snare VI tie COSl
of such construction, required under
the present law. This will reduce the
total county taxation for federal aid
work approximately $2,2000O0 a year,
and the board be lieves that this relief
should be granted the counties.
The vote on this proposition was
25 ayes and noes.
Proposition No 5: Provided the
counties are relieved of paying any
part of the cost of Federal Aid Con-
struction, this county board fayors the
distribution of the Joint federal and
state construction funds not on
county basis but in some manner fair
to all sections of the state so that the
principal lines of travel throughout the
state may be completely surfaced at
the earliest possible moment, making
all sections of the state readily ac-
cessible to all other sections.
The vote on this proposition was
"a ayes and noes.
Proposition No. s: This county
board favors the payment of a refund
in the form of q maintenance bonus
by the state to the counties which
have already bonded and pushed the
construction of high type roads or
which will do so in the future. Where
no OF