The dispatch-news. [volume] (Lexington, S.C.) 1919-2001, 1922-01-25
ii

i anu "4kA Ol4IVA
II
Let us, then, consider some OF the
farmers grievances, and see how far
they are real. In doing so, we should
remember that, while there have been,
and still are, instances Of purposeful
abuse, the subject should not be ap-
preached with any general imputation
to existing distributive agencies Of de-
liberately Intentional oppression, but
rather with the conception that, the
marketing of farm products has not
been modernized
An ancient evil, and a persistent
one, is~the ,undergrading Of farm prod
ucts, with the result that what the
farmers sell as Of one quality Is re-
sold as Of higher. That this. sort OF
chicanery should persist on any I'M
portant scale In these days Of busi-
ness integrity would seem almost in
credible, but there is much evidence
that 1t does so persist. Even as !
write, the newspapers announce the
suspension of several firms from the
New York Produce Exchange for ex.
porting to Germany as No. 2 wheat
whole shipload of grossly inferior wheat
mixed with oats, chaff and the like.
Another evil is that Of inaccurate
weighing of farm products, which, 1t
is charged, is sometimes matter of
I dishonest intention and sometimes of
protective policy ons the part of the
local buyer, who fears that he may
weigh out" more than he weighs in"
A greater grievance is that at pres
ent the field farmer has little or no
control over the time and conditions
Of marketing his products, with the
result that he is often underpaid for
his products and usually overcharged
for marketing service. The differ
ence between what the farmer re-
ceiyes and what the consumer pays
often exceeds all possibility Of justi-
fication. To cite single Illustration.
Last year, according to figures attest
ed by the railways and the growers.
Georgia watermelon-raisers received
on the average 7.5 cents for melon.
the railroads got 12.7 cents for carry
ing it to Baltimore and the consumer
paid one dollar, leaving 79S cents for
the service of marketing and its risks,
as against 20.2 cents for growing and
transporting. The hard annals Of
farm-life are repIete with such com.
mentarjes on the crudeness of pres.
ent practices.
Nature prescribes that the farmers
goods" must be finished within two
or three months Of the year. while
financial and storage limitations gen
orally compel him to sell them ut the
same time AS rule. other industries
are, in a continuous process Of finish
ing goods for the markets; they dis
tribute as they produce, and they can
curtail production without too great
injury to themselves or the coininu-
nifty; but if the farmer restricts his
output, 1t is with disastrous conse
auences, both to himself and to the
community.
IL: The average farmer is busy with
production for the major part of the
year. and has nothing to sell. The
bulk of his output comes on the mar
ket ut once. Because Of lack of Stor
age facilities and Of financial support.
the farmer cannot carry his goods
:hrough the year jtnd dispose of them
as they are currently needed. In the
great majority of cases, farmers have
to entrust storage-in warehouses and
elevators-an,l the financial! carrying
If their products to others.
Farm products are generally nar-
&eted at a time when there is CON
.estion Of both transportation ard
tnance-wheH cars ani money are
SEA: e The outcome, in mary IN
S;a.,ces, is tli:,t the farmers not oE,y
<siI under pressure, and therefore at
Il disadvantage but are compelled to
take further reductions in net returns,
N order to meet the charges for ne
service If storing. transporting, financ.
M, and Ultimate marketins-Nsich
charges they claim, are often excaS
sive. bear heavily on both consumer
ani producer. aEh are under the con.
troll CT those performing the services
It IS true that they are relieved OF
the risks OF a changing market by
selling at once but they are quite VIII