The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1922-05-18
ORDER OF PUBLICATION

Mary A. Schldegel vs.. Wilhelm Schloegel.
No. 2l04 Equity. IN the Circuit Court for
Garrett County, Maryland.
The object of this suit is to procure a de-
cree of divorce a vincllo rnatrimonii for the
plaintiff from the defend n.
The Bill states
/ That during the month of May, 1868, the
plaintiff was married t. the SAID defendant
by the Rev. Hoffman, a German Lutheran
minister, near Accde-t, in GaIr tt county.
2. That following said marriage she resided
with the said defendant as man and wife,
near Accident, in Garrett County. for period
OF about three months, at the end of which
said time the SAID defendant deserted and
abandoned your oratriX without any just
cause whatever.
3. That during the tine when they were
living together the said dlf ndart on fire.
quent occasions acted in j very cruel and bru-
tai manner toward your O3at~iN and her
young daughter, child by a former maITi-
age beating both in shan gful manner.
threatening to cut their threats and to do
them other BODILY injury so that the plain
tiff became and was afraid that he would
take her life, and his conduct toward her n
this particular becoming so Gangsro she
was finally compel ed TO have him bound
over to keep the peace VIII h acton was
taken out about the mo- n of August. IS 3.
and was followed by his deserton of tna
plaintiff
4. That since the date Of said separation
and abandonment she has n,vor heard from
the said defendant and does rot know what
became of him. and said separation has con-
tinued uninterruptedly for more than three
years.
5. That one child was horn of said mar-i-
age, Phoebe Catherine, who mas since grown
to wOmanhood and MARI ed.
g. That during the time when she was liv-
ing with the said defendant the plaintiff en-
deavored at all times to treat him properly
and in manner BETTING ttk relationship,
and has always acted in proper and chastc
manner.
T. That during the year 1879. and some
sixteen years after said dos- and aban-
donment by the defendant the plaintiff be-
ing informed by certain persons whom she
believed to be correctly informed as to the
law that said absence unheard of was sufEi-
cient to give her divorce without any legal
action whatever, and acting in perfect gccd
faith and believing that she was free TO re-
marry, did intermarry with ore George Vag-
don with whom she lived until the time of his
death in 1911, without any knowledge of the
lllegality of her action, but she has since
been informed of the Illegally of said mar
riage.
s. That your oratrix has been resident
of Garrett county ever since the rmation of
said county.
8. That your plaintiff believes said dcser-
ton and abandonment on the part of the
defendant to be deliberate and final and said
separation to be irrevocable and beyond any
possible hope of reconciliation.
10. That the said Wilhelm Schloegel is not
resident of the State of Maryland but the
plaintiff does not know his present location
The Ill then prays for divorce vinculo
matrimCnii of the plaintiff from the defen-
dant. For general relief and for an order of
publication.
Il is thereupon, this 9th day of April.
1922, ordered by the Circuit Court for Gar
rett county. Maryland, in Equity, that the
plaintiff, by having copy of this order in
serted in some newspaper published in Gar
rett comfy once in each of four successive
weeks before the 26th day of May 1922, give
notice to the said absent defendant of the
object and substance of this bill, warning him
to be and appear in this Court. either in per-
son or by solicitor, on or before the 18th day
Of June; 1922, to show cause, if any he has,
why a decree should not be pas led as praycd.
f. z. TOWER, Clerk
True copy-Test: E. z. TOWER, Clerk