The united opinion. [volume] (Bradford, Vt.) 1881-1970, 1922-01-20
Continued From Last Week.

"
Now, what f. the farmer asking
Without trying to catalogue the re
medal measures that have been sug
gested in his behalf the principal pro
posals that bear directly on the i'm
provement of his distributing and mar
keting relations may be summarized as
follows =
First: storage warehouses for cot
ton wool, and tobacco, and elevators
for grain, of sufficient capacity to meet
the maximum demand on them at the
peak of the marketing period. The
farmer thinks that either private capt.
tai must furnish these facilities, or the
state must erect and own the eleva-
tors and warehouses.
Second: weighing and grading Of
agricultural products, and certification
thereof, to be done by impartial and
disinterested public inspectors (this Is
already accomplished to some extent
by the federal licensing of weighers
and graders), to eliminate underpay-
ing, overcharging, and unfair grading,
and to facilitate the utilization Of the
stored products as the basis of credit.
Third: certainty Of credit sufficient
to enable the marketing Of products
In an orderly manner.
Fourth: the Department of Agricul-
ture should collect, tabulate summa-
rize, and regularly and frequently pub
lish and distribute to the farmers, full
information from all the markets Of
the world, so that they shall be as well
Informed of their selling position as
buyers now are Of their buying posi-
ton.
Fifth: freedom to lntegrate the bust
ness Of agriculture by means of con-
solidated selling agencies, co-ordinat-
ing and cooperating in such way as to
put the farmer on an equal footing
with the large buyers Of his products,
and with commercial relations in other
industries.
When a business requires specialized
talent it has to buy it. SO will the
farmers; and perhaps the best way for
them to get it would be to utilize some
Of the present machinery of the larg-
est established agencies dealing in
farm products. Of course, If he wishes,
the farmer may go further and engage
in fOur-milling and other manufactures
of food products. In my opinion,
however, he would be wise to stop
short Of that. Public interest may be
opposed to all great integrations; but
in justice, should they be forbidden to |
the farmer and permitted to others? |
The corporate form Of association can
mot now be wholly adapted to his OBJ |
jects and conditions. The looser CO. |
operative form seems more generally |
suitable. Therefore, he wishes to be
free, if he finds 1t desirable and feas- !
1ble, to resort to cooperation with his
fellows and neighbors, without run
ming afoul of the law. To urge that
the farmers should have the same lib
erty to consolidate and coordinate
their peculiar economic functions,
which other industries in their fields
enjoy, is not, however, to concede that
any business indignation should have
legislative sanction to exercise monop-
olistic power. The American people
are as firmly opposed to industrial as
to political autocracy, whether at
tempted by rural or by urban industry.
For lack Of united effort the farmers
as a whole are still marketing their
crops by antiquated methods, or by no
methods at ALL but they are surrounded
by a business world that has been
modernized to the last minute and Is
tirplasslv striving for efficiency. This