Norwich bulletin., 1922-06-12
A Bulletin To Let
 Advertisement Will Rent It
LEGAL NOTICE
KnfIcE
FoREcLosUREs ARE GRANTED

BY SUPERIOR COURT
 Several foreclosures were granted by Judge James H. Webb at the short cal- endar session of the superior court in this city Friday. The Mariners Saw ings Bank of New London was granted foreclosure for s4.S5O.ss against Conti- mental Hotel, Inc. In the suit of Horo- witz vs Murphy, adm. foreclosure by 1 sale was granted. Thomas c. Dillon was named as committee on sale with Wii- | liam H. Casey, William A. Wilcox, and 1 Alexander Marr appraisers. Foreclosure | by sale was also granted in P. Schwartz | Co vs. Walker. trustee. and others in the sum of s1.015. Thomas c. Dillon was appointed committee on sale and P
 Hall Shurts. James R. May and J. J. Lawless appdaisers. Foreclosure for l S69S was granted in John Saunders V Edwina Silveira and others. and tudg- ment for s1.353.11 was. granted Id Ettors Ghidella vs Isabella Ciocchia
 Other matters disposed of were ths following: Selikowitch vs Connecticut Mortgage & Title Guaranty Co.,. ct al. argumnet of demurrer of Connecticut Mortgage & Title Guaranty Co.,, post poned. Redden, ct al, Sullivan. ct al. supplemental Judgment postponed. Groton Iron Works vs City of New Lon don, argument of demurrer; judge took papers Schmidt ct al vs. Reynolds. 1, zs
 failure to plead: postponed. Schmidt. ct al., vs Reynolds ct al 1, disclosure of
 defense; g. default for failure to plead. l 8, foreclosure and limitation of time,
 postponed. Saunders vs. Silveira, ct al, foreclosure and limitation, s69s. Chi della Vs. Ciocicchio, continued for judg- ] ment, $1.253.11. B. Shoninger vs. Pyne- argument of demurrer and motion for
 more specific statement; postponed.
 Toupasz vs Tytla, ct al, argument of de- s murrer, postponed. Allis. EXT, vs. Att
 wood, judgment, postponed. Agar, ct a al vs Ironsides Board Co.,. that case os given preferred standing upon the list and assigned for trial some day in ths c present term for the reason that it a
 an action for the specific performance q of a contract of lease of the mill prop
 erty, which contract was executed oc-
 tober 27. 1919, and was to commence
 not later than May 1, 1920; that the de- !. fendant refuses to deliver possession ot :. said premises to the plaintiffs and that '' the value of said contract of lease is - being destroyed by the postponement of
 the case and the inability of the plain
 tiff C. A. Agar Incorporated. to obtain
 possession of the property. for the spe-
 cihc performance of which it is suing;
 and for the further reason that the de- tendant has, in violation of the order ot Injunction sold. transferred and other IT
 was proposed to lease by the execution
 and delivery of a mortgage for one mil- lion dollars of. Credit Discount Trust
 vs. Allen Spool & Wood Turning Co.
 hearing on application for stay Of fur
 ther proceedings filed by trustee in
 bankruptcy, postponed Hull, State s s Attorney. ex rel, Eliza erritt vz. Hinck-
 ley, judge of probate, judge took
 papers. Anna sikorsh vs August si-
 korski, 1, alimony pendente lite, 2. al-
 lowance of counsel fees. 8. disclosure Of n- defense or case placed on uncontested k list, postponed. Taylor vs Duea. ct al
 1 termination of continuance, g. 1T nd
 defense, judgment of foreclosure. post
 poned. Ina B. Lincoln vs. Howard N Lincoln, permission to amend complaint granted, to be filed in one week Berths ID lC Latham vs. Charles E. Latham, that -7 defendant be committed for contempt
 of. J. Smerchznsky vs Cheney ct al = additional bond for prosecution, SIS oi
 justification in two weeks. M. Smer
 chansky vs Cheney. ct al. sdditiona- . bond for prosecution, sT5 or justihca ;sSyss ton in two weeks Johnson vs. Noble
 ct al, l. second order of notice, 2. con tinuance, postponed. Beyer vs. Fishkln . default for failure to plead. answer i'
 two weeks. Perkins, Receiver vs Con
 necticut Silica Corp. ct al, answer Q nd bother pleadihgs, postponed Jackson vs | e. pleadings in two weeks. Segar vs. Ryar defsult for failure to plead, pleading .l in two weeks; Olaf, Jr., vs Andrews
 hearing on petition for new trial, post
 poned. Bertha C. Latham vs Charles E . lAatham, hearing on motion to vacat In order for aHmony pendente hte- of G;l oskowftch vs Avery, ct al motion to cit in administrator as co-defendant, .grahi
 cd. s. Patterson, Inc, vs. Peterson. Dc .4 fault for failure to plead, pleadfngs
 two weeks. Selfkowitch vs NorpEc,
 Onion Fire Insurance Society. Ltd, ds
 fault for failure to plead. of. Hend, "a Tvs Ducy, ct al argument of motion {
 strike out, denied answer or othe
 tpleadings in two weeks. Zezulewicz V =A Rokowski non-suit opened and perrf,
 sion to file bond for prosecution. gran
 ed; SIS in two weeks; Grill vs Cool non-s1it for failure to plead, reply (
 other pleadfngs in two weeks. Easter
 Tribe of Peuuot Indians annual scc0ur
 of Charles L. Stewart. overseer; sccep
 ed and Charles L. Stewart re-sppotnte .s,o overseer O'Neill, ct al, vs. Gear w Adnr., appeal from rohate, argument LSi demurrer to remonstrance. June 2oth 3ES g a. m. Mariners Savings Bank vs. Di TH ca, ct al, 1. acceptance of report of con oo mittee. accepted. 2. order for resale I,, property amendment and modffcztic fN-t of judgment. Mariners Savings Bar Vs O Noto, et al' l, acSeplAnce oi 2 : port of committee. aScepted, 2. order ' / resale of property, amended judgrnei
 or amendment to it. Johnson vs. \ ble, ct al, 1, judgment by default.
 foreclosure and limitation of time. pos
 poned. Perkins. receiver vs qonnectic
 Selica Corp ct al, disclosure of dsfen
 rjudgment postponed. Peck. ct al. ' s Falls Co, hearing on motion 10 vsca sf judgment and to dissolve iniunctic $u postponed. U, & Trust CO. of N. ,. A York ct al, Exrs. vs. Shore Line Eie
 tric Ky. Co, Old Colony Trust O.
 Shore Line Electric Railway Co.. et 1, application for order allowing Ro ert W. Perkins. receiver. 10 contin
 business for four months from June
 1929, granted; 2. application of receiv . for authority to pay interest up
 bonds of the Groton ( stonington stfs
 Railway Co.,. granted.