Norwich bulletin., 1922-03-04
FORECLOSURE FOR Ss,sss.sO
ON PROPERTY IN GROToN

Judgment of foreclosure of mortgage
was granted by Judge Christopher L.
Avery at short calender session of the
superior court in New London Fl ;day
morning in the case of the Mariners Saw
ing Bank of New London against Frank
Q. Noses ct al. The mortgage which
is on property In Groton and interest
due amount to $3.s33sO and Tuesday.
May 2, was fixed for limitation of time
for redemption. James R. May, real es-
tate dealer, placed a valuation of $4,000
on the property consisting OF a two
storw dwelling and barn nd lot.
In the case Of Harold T. Crlswold vs.
Thomas C. West. Judge Avery entered
an order allowing Attorney Max Boyer
$40 for services as committee of sale
and Thomas S. McGinley aaa BryoG A.
Zones. IS each for services as ,apprais-
ers in appraising a pile driver, which
was attached in the suit.
An order authorizing the receiver to
continue the business for four months
from March II was entered IN the case
of Di Francesca VS.. AnIantia, a1rnr. At
torney Herbert w Rathbun stared to the
court that the receiver has been con-
Quoting the business under order of the
court for about year and It IS not
ready to be closed out as yet.
Other matters were disposed of as fol-
lows:
Richard Kiley VS. Elizabeth B. <Kiley.
Motion that plaintiff be committed for
failure to comply with order of court
for payment of alimony pendente lite,
postponed. Caracausa VS.. Di Noto. Dis
closure of defense or judgment, postpon-
ed. Tobin vs. Dugas. Argument Of
demurrer, off. 2 Motion for more par
ticular statement, off. Amendment may
be fled. Fitzgerald VS.. City of Norwich.
Motion for new trial under Section 81
S25, postponed. Carl Hopf VS.. Flora
Clark Hopf Order that plaintiff be COM
mitted for failure to comply with or
der Of court for payment of alimony
pendente lite, off. Gammins vs. Oddo. ct
AL Disclosure of defense or Judgment,
postponed. Peterson VS.. Patterson, EXX.
Non-suit for failure to comply with order
of court,s off Harris VS.. Allen. ct al. Sup
Elemental Judgment, postponed. Geary
VS.. Shallett's Cleaning & Dyeing, Inc,
ct al. Supplemental judgment, postpon-
| ed. Braman VS.. Babcock. ExX! ct al. Arg
/ ument of demurrers of Eliza Merritt,
| postponed. Donahue VS.. Davis, ct al. Arg
| ument of demurred, postponed. Minnie
| ETskine VS.. Mary E. Lincoln. Argument
! of demurrer, postponed. Charmatz VS..
| Bentley. Answer or other pleadings with
| in one week, pleadings in two weeks. F,
! Brennan VS., Bentley. Answer or other
pieadings within one week, pleadings in
| two weeks. n. G. Brennan VS.. Bentley
| Answer or other pleadings within one
week, pleadings in two weeks. Ladd VS.
| Brown. Answer or other pleadings with
in one week, pleadings in two weeks. Eu-
| gene F. Groneau VS.. Ida G. Groneau. Al
| lowance to defend postponed. Bertha C
Latham VS.. Charles E. Latham. THAI
the defendant be committed for failure
to comply with the order of court II
payment of alimony, postponed. Ralph
I. Main VS.. Sadie NJ. Main. Rule t.
show cause why plaintiff should not BIT
adjudged guilty of contempt, off. At
tonelli, ct al. VS.. Gates. That the case
be restored to the docket postponed
Walton VS.. Appley, ct al Order of no
tice by registered mail to defendan
| Weseman, granted. Phebe A Miller VS.
Louis W. Miller. 1 A1imony pendente lite
off. 2 Allowance to defend, $35 for plain
tiff in two weeks. U. S. Trust Co. o
New York, ct al, Exrs., VS.. Shore Lin,
Electric Ry Co. Old Colony Trust Co VS.
Shore Line Electric Railway Co ct al
Hearing on motion of heirs of Thoma
b Hewitt that receiver surrender pos
session of land and equipment to them
postponed. Solowoy VS.. Fishkin. Defaul
for failure to plead, pleadings in tw,
weeks.