White Pine news. [volume] (East Ely, Nev.) 1920-1923, 1922-11-19
CALENDAR CALLED N
M'FADDEM'S COURT


the district court yesterday morning
before Judge C. j. McFadden and
matters In which the attorneys were
ready to proceed were set down 40
be disposed of during the week.
The calendar contains the usual
number OF cases which have been
passed from time to time because of
the fact that the attorneys in charge
of the cases were not ready to procsed
and in all these cases Judge McFad-
den urgently insisted that the cases
he either brought before the court
for final determination or dismissed
from the records.
In the cases brought by r. Fl.
Holtzman, the Ely Packing Company
and others against w. S. Bennett and
others. arising out of liens fled
against the Wyoming Mining and
Milling Company some time ago and
in which there are motions for new
trials pending, these motions were
set down for hearing before the court
next Tuesday morning at 10 o'clock.
The case of Dr. Marie Michel
been appealed to the district court
from the decision rendered in the
justice court, will in all probability
be tried this week. Counsel for the
defendant was not present in court
and the matter was left open, with
the understanding that prompt action
would be taken thereon as soon as
the interested counsel could confer
and advise the court.
Gentle Georgetta and Rosetta
against John Thomas in a matter in
volving the right to the use of the
water of Mud springs was passed
for the present on motion of ]. NJ.
Lockhart. representing the plaintiffs.
Charles A. Walker. representing the
defendant. suggested that the case be
dismissed, but Attorney Lockhart re-
piled to the effect that he was not
willing TO have a dismissal entered at
this time.
The suit brought by r. A. Millick
against Fred H. Vahrenkasp and 9TH
ers, involving transaction with ref
erence to certain shares OF stock, was
passed.
In the case OF ]. e. Brinton against
w. s. Bennett and others q demurrer
filed by the defendant some time ago
was sustained. No further action has
been taken and the court gave the
plaintiff ten days in which to file an
amended complaint. Attorney B. l..
Quayle, representing the plaintiff, in
that his client may possibly
elect not TO file an answer. in which
event the case would naturally fall
of its own weight.
The action brought by Carl Muir
against Ed Wilson, involving mining
transactions in the Hamilton district.
now on demurrer, was set for hear
ing next Saturday at 10 o'clock.
The case of Frank r. Lundie
against w. s. Enslow and II. c. Mich
olson, which arises out of a claim
for services rendered in connection
with the care of certain property un-
der attachment in court proceedings,
is On demurrer and was set for hear
ing next Tuesday morning
The suit brought by Alfred Bel
lander against B. II. Robson, which
is for damages alleged to have arisen
when the defendant Robson brought
an action against the plaintiff Bel
lander in the justice court. alleging
the changing of a brand one eve,
which was dismissed in the lower
court, is now up on demurrer and
will be heard next Friday morning.
In the matter of the Portland Cat
tie Loan Company against the Utah
Nevada Land and Livestock Com
pany. Columbia Trust Company. ]. D.
Armstrong and A. p. Hendricksen as
trustees, which arises out OF judg-
ment rendered in favor OF the Ad'
ams-McGill Company against the Ba-
ker Land and Livestock Company and
in which the plaintif in this suit
succeeded to the interests of the Ad-
ams-McGill Company, was passed on
the request of the attorneys for the
parties to the action
In the abatement suit brought by
G. F. Foreman as deputy attorney
general against Hugh Wilson and
others, in which 1t is sought to re-
move the baudy houses now within
the 400-yard limit. the court ordered
the attorneys to submit briefs, giving
fifteen days in whieh-to file the open
ing lrief fifteen days thereafter for
the answering brief and fifteen da-s
for the reply brief. This makes a
total of forty-fiye days for the sub
mission of the matter to the court
for its decision on the demurrers
filed to the complaint.
The suit of Efthimias Papas
against the McGill National bank.
which is up on demurrer. was passed
at the request of Attorney V. II. Var
gas, representing the plaintiff. The
action is based on transaction which
Papas alleges to have had with the
bank and In which he purchased ex-
change on a bank in Odessa. Russia.
The transaction is alleged to have oc-
Cured In September, 1915, and when