New Ulm Post. [volume] (New-Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1864-1933, 1922-12-22

being the balance due them of the
apprppriagtio 10000 madeSAipIir'fiIls
s12, 1922. The Auditor was Instructed
is issue his warrant of said amount to.
the Town Treasurer Of said Town.
The committee apE7inteed to work in.
conjunction with the supervisors Of the
Town Of BashaW fer expenditure Of.
funds for county aid on r.oadsGin said
Township reported ia Wri ing that the
Town Of BashaW has expended the.
sum Of %53910 for grading and gravel
ing and, therefore, recomgnen5 that
said Town be paidthe sum of $l000s.OO
iout Of the County Road Bridg Fund
bbsiiad ~ the balance due thenaaofsthesap-
IpropriatI8a ss8lf s$s2s55GO.oo nada April
Sff2H tffo2222 The Auditor wax Instructed
Ito issue his warrant of SAID amount to
ke Town Treasurer Of said Town:
The committee appointed to work
Il conjunction with The supervisors Of
the Town Ct Leavenworth for expendi-
Cure of funds for county aid on roads
ia sud Township reported il writing
that the Tow of LeavenWortht has
expended the sum Of $4805:55 for
grading and crawling and, therefore,
recommend that said Town be paid
the sum Of $750.c0 out ofstheF County
Road & Bridge Fund, bsing the balance
due them Of the appropriation Of
sof $2250.0O made May {, 1892. The
Auditor was instructed to- issue his
warrant of said amount to- the Town
Treasurer Ct said Town.
The committee appointed o work
ii c%on5juoctiona with the supervisors
Of the Town Of N5rth Star for expendi-
ture of funds for county aid on roads
in said Township reported in writing
Tint the Townyof North Star has ex-
pended the sum of 100000 for grading
and gravalingta and, therefore, recommend
that said Town, be paid the sum of
100000 out ef the County Road &
Bridge Fund, being part offthe amount
appropriated by the County to said
Town. The report was accepted. and
the Auditor was instructed to issue
his warrant ia the amount of 100000
payable to said Township.
The committee appointed to work in
conjunction with the supervisors Of
the Town of Sigel for expenditure cf
funds for county aid on roads in said
Township reported in writing that tle
Town of Sigel has expended the sum
Of $685. ~ for grading and graveling
and that the committee inspected the
work and therefore recommend that
said Town be reimbursed in the sum
of $777.86 out # the County Read
Bridge Fund, being balance due them
of the amount appropriated on April
IL, 1922 by the County to Shutdown:
The report was accepted aads the Audi
tor was Instructed to issue his warrant
in the amount as stated payable to
said Town. "a /.
In the matter Of the hearing 'ont Jul
dicial Road, Blue Eerth and Brown
Counties, which hearing was held be-
fore the court on. December. 11th,,
1922, the County Attorney reported
that Mr.. Philips, County Attorney Of
Blue Earth County, Pfaender &sErick-,
son Of New Ulm for the Town Of
Cottonwood and he himself in behalf
of Brown County appeared before the
Court ia opposition to the granting Of.
,haid petition, that Blue Earth County
SOLD al engineer atwork for their part.
C the opposition; the T~oWnsnip1Fo Of
cottonwood has not: had any engineer;
tor has Brown County. After consul
,ation,1t was consensus ofso1iAion that
since Blue Earth, County had an engi-.
aeer at work, it would be m~ostecono-
meal for Brown County and the Town
ship Of Cottonwood to authorize the
engineer already at work On the job
to continue lis work across the entire
stretch of road r.etitionnH for. where