Norwich bulletin. [volume] (Norwich, Conn.) 1895-2011, 1922-01-23
MOTION LIST MATTERS
BEFORE JUDGE BROWN

4 short calendar session for the Jan
uary additional session Of The superior
court which is to be opened here next
Tuesday morning. was held Friday morn
ing at 10 o'clock with Judge Allyn L.
Brown presiding The following motions
on the list were disposed of:
Schaumer vs.. fotten ct al. that de-
fault be opened and Judgment set aside,
postponed /; August Y. Chairman, Jr.. vs..
Esther NJ Chairman, allowance for de-
Tense and alinony pendente lite, post
poned Hazel n. Knapp vs.. Frederick R.
Knapp, permission to file answer, granted
as soon as alimony is paid TO date; Girls
void vest West, 1. Report Of committee
, OF sale, . Modification OF order. Judge
i took the papers Frisbie VS.. FrisbieMc-
| CormicK Co. Judgment or default enter
| ed, postponed Hawthorne Sash and Door
| Co. vs.. West ct al. that default against
! city of New London be opened and city Of
New@Kondon, earnishee allowed to plead
| judge took tho papers: Donahue VS..
| Davis ct al. default for failure to plead,
| pleadings TO be fled i'll 10 days; Hazel n.
Knapp vs. Frederick r. Knapp, that the
/ defendant be held in contempt for failure
! TO comply with the order Of the court in
| relation to the payment of alirnoly. off
| Firmin VS. Hedlund motion TO erase fol
want Of q party plaintiff. postponed
Marlin VS.. Hanover, disclosure Of defens.
or Judgment, postponed; Adams Stee
Products Co. vs.. Mccarthy ct al, default
for failure to answer, pleadiugs to be 6lec
in 10 days; Joseph VS.. Tiffany default
for failure to plead. pleadings in 10 days
Mackenzie vs.. Treyena, eXT., default fol
failure to plead, Dieadings III two weeks
Peterson VS. Patterson, exx default FOL
failure to plead. pleadings in one week
Sosonkin VS.. Brown ct al. order accept
ing appraisal and inventory, final accoun
of receiver and discharging receiver
judge took the papers; Braman VS.. Bah
cock, exx.. ct al, default for failure t
plead. pleadings in/two weeks Davis e
al VS.. Solomon, disclosure of defense o
judgment, on Or before next Friday; She
vs.. Gavitt, motion to craze for want of
PARTY plaintiff. off; Caracausa vs.. Di
Nito, disclosure Of defense or judgment
l postponed; Negendahl VS.. Hobart, defaul
for failure 10 plead, p1eadings ordere
< filed Dart VS.. Eadie. default for faiIur
to plead, pleadings in two weeks Ishal
. VS.. Burlant ct al, I. Disclosure Of de
Tense by Burlant, IN writing 2 Continu
) ance, for 80 days; 8. Hearing on II
1 eeivers account, off; STANCE VS. Kol
e lCarton Co. Inc, answer or other plead
!! ing within two weeks, off; Gallup ct a
c VS.. Thames R&yer Lumber Co, l. Cor
e irnation of temporary as permanent ri
! .
. Limitation Of time for resentation ,
e claims; 4 Authorizing receiver to cor
t tinue business for a further period (
f three months; 5. Authorizing payment
q compensation to temporary receiver. pos
II poned: town of Groton ct al. VS.. Grotc
: Iron Works ct al. order of notice, pos
= poned; Standard Machinery Co. vs.. |
: s. Electric Co, disclosure of defense.
: lieu thereof. judgment; no defense, judi
e ment for s523 Blankepfeld vs.. Charmat
If argument of motion to cite Egon Blal
e 1enfeld as co-plaintiff. POSTPONED Al
o lderson VS.. Ritchotte. default for failu
e to answer, pleadIngs in two weeks Sh
d tucket Worsted Mills Co. VS. Kelly, d
e fault for failure to plead. postponet
n Tobin vs.. Dugas. default for failure
l. plead, pleadings in two weeks; Goloste
,e vs.. Albert ct al. default Tor failure
r plead. pleadings in two weeks; Gallup
e al. VS.. Thames River Lumber Co.. hea
ing on application to compromise clail
- Judge took the papers Richard ], Woct
= VS.. Louise 3. Spoten, allowance to q
/" fepd, sa5 in three weeks; Reba a. Osti
e ny vs.. Leon A. Ostigny. second order
u notice, granted