Every evening, Wilmington daily commercial. (Wilmington, Del.) 1878-1928, 1922-07-13
TESTIMONY FINISHED
IN THE AOA!R CASE
Superior Court Fixes September
1 for Filing Briefs on tho
Facts and Law.

After hearing much contradictory |
testimony on rule requiring Robert
Adair, member OF the New Castle
County Bar Association. 10 show CAUSE
why he should not be disbarred. the
Superior Court yesterday afternoon
fixed September / for fling briefs on
the facts and law. David j. Rein
hardt, who represented the bar as
socia ton. suggested August Is for
filing, but was told transcribing the
testimony would take several weeks.
Robert Adair was recalled and
Identified letters he had sent To Alex
ander Jamison, an attorney. rega riding
proposed settlement OF the pudzinsld
case. The correspondence was ad
mitted as evidence after Mr. Rein
! hardt had reserved the right to re-
quest that II he stricken out.
Former Constable Andrew f. Cole.
Jr. testified that Mr.. Adair gave him
| Sis on February 81. 1922. and sent
! him to Mr.. Jamison and Edward n.
du Ross who. refused 10 take the
money saying the amount was in
sufficient to settle the Dudzinsk case.
| Charles Casimir Hoinowski also
! called Haines, who acted as nterpre-
tee In the du Ross Dudziuski real es-
tate negotiations. testified that John
DudzinsllI owed 500 rent and du Ross
offered 10 include Il in the purchase
price of $500. hut D1ldznski objected.
HoinowsN said Adair volunteered to
nut UP money for the real estate deal
When John Dudzinski was refused a
loan by his brother-in-law. The wit
ness denied that he rebuked Dudzin-k
for having Adair arrested on the en-
bezzlement charge.
Frank Tomczyk testified that Johr
Dudzinski told Adair he did not wan
20 consummate the real estate deal he
cause he did not have sufficient money
, Dudzinski remarked 10 Adair. accord
ing TO Tomczyk, that If he ha'
Hoinowslx!'s brains ne would not hav
had Adair arrested on the charge q
embc zzlement and Adair replied tina
II he had done wrong Dudzinehi shoul'
not withdraw the warrant. but II h
had not done wrong Dudzins<i shout
withdraw II. Tomczyk stated jon
Dudziuski was under the influence q
liquor when he made the remark. TIL
, witness denied that he told Mrs. Dud
: zinski to swear the s65 which he
z / husband paid in tho real eetate dea
belonged 10 her.
Samuel Prunewski quoted Raymon
Dudzinski as saying "a lot OF m
testimony was false" and Edward +
d du Ross as remarking say all yo
n know and everything will be socd 10
you"
u Mrs. Charles asimir Hainowsli an
John RropoVitCh declared John bud
= z!nsli refused to include $50 back reu
n In the purchase price ot 1860 FOR th
. du Ross property.
@ Mrs. Mary J. Coins and Cha rios "
= Weltman testified that du Ross sal
y he would not give up the bad cheek
e II Adair paid ham Sos, but would kee
h them until Adair's trial on the en-
= bez3lemeut charge.
e Raymond Dublin sl<i denied that n
e told Rrunewski a lot of his CDut
a zinslIi'sl testimony was false. II
e stated Brunewsli asked John Due
II zinski to withdraw the warrant on tt
embeZzlement charge.
II Edward b. du Ross denied the state
= ment of three Polish witnesses that h
# would fix IL up with them II the
IS testified properly" He also denied tia
:. he wanted TO credit John Dudzins 81
a. with SEQ for rem: and denied that Go
d offered him $50.
n Alexander Jam!son alec denied N,
q Cole offered du Ross 500.
Horace @. Easthurn denied tn.
is Adair showed him John Longs no
"a for 5000. Mr. Eastburn said Ada
q was entitled only 20 a small amour
- in the Long case.