The Chicago whip. (Chicago, Ill.) 1919-19??, 1921-03-05

ong is it good for? Would | have to
lave any notice TO move and if so
how long notice?
Ans. In the absence of rebutting
circumstances your lease would renew
tsef for another year, namely, from
May |, 1920, to May /, 1921. This
and your tenancy would be good
intil May /. 1921. You are a
.enant under lease until that time.
The landlord has the right to refuse
O renew your lease at that time if
ne so chooses. No notice to you is
necessary as you are a tenant under
lease and notice to vacate is not
necessary at the expiration OF lease
CUES. While my little boy was out
playing with some other small boys
)ne of them jumped on him and beat
him, pushing him down several times
n the mud and ruined a new suit
which had just bought know this
BOYS father. How can | make his
father pay for this suit.
Ans. You cannot force the father
o pay you for this suit unless you
IAN persuade him to do so OF his own
volition. Parents are not legally LA
bic for such torts oil their MINOR chill
lren.
CUES. If man has lived with a
woman unmarried and acquired prop
erty in which her name has been at
ached TO the deeds, as his lawful wife,
hey then separate and divide same,
which is on separate deeds. one taking
me and the other taking the deed to
he other property. If he then marries
and wants his property in hand on his
awful wife, how can this matter be
,ettled? The deed has been recorded.
Ans. ! presume that when you sep
lrated, no releases were signed on
either OF the deeds but that you mere
y took the deed to one piece OF prop
.rty and gave her the deed to the
other. | presume also that you are
low lawfully married TO another
party. II this is the case, the easiest
way for you 10 arrange the matter is
% get in touch with the woman and
have her execute a release to you on
he piece OF property which you
agreed to take and you can in turn ex-
ecute release to her on the piece
Of property which she was TO take.
| should advise that you consult a
lawyer in your local city and have him
property execute such releases and
you can then have them recorded. You
should certainly meet with no oppo-
'sition on her part as her title TO the
piece OF property which she has is
certainly no better ii even as good as
yours.
Cues An automobile which | was
driving was struck and damaged by
a Yellow cab. 1t was entirely the
fault of the cab driver, but have been
told that it is impossible to win suit
against the Yellow cab people Is this
true?
Ans. The above is a popular mis-
conception. The Yellow Cab Co. pos
sibly has men who are well versed in
such accident cases, but if you have
sufficient witnesses to establish the
fact that the accident was due to
the fault of the cab driver, it will not
be difficult at all for a lawyer to
obtain a judgment against the Yellow
Cab Co. You are entitled to have
your case heard by jury of twelve
men whom your attorney has as much
power in selecting as attorneys for the
Yellow Cab Co. Unfortunately, how
ever, these cab drivers probably stick
together and will help each other out
in attempting to place the blame on
the outside party and probably in
many cases thus defeat many merito-
rious cases, but in a case where you
have sufficient evidence TO establish the
fact that any particular accident was
due to the negligence of the employees
OF the Yellow Cab Co, you will find