The Wheeling intelligencer. [volume] (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1903-1961, 1921-11-17
STATES EVIDENCE EXCLUDED oS
GROUND THAT NO CAST HAL
BEEN MADE OUT
SECOND EFFORT TO GET 9ALLoTs
ApNKIrTED FAILS-DEfENShS
CASE NOT PRESENTED

r.sr Nor pRESENrED
------.-----
.i,, 49,, ,,,s.yu,.t,nn ri>rn
'n"'i'-E ''S ~ r.h,,x,, 81, iurv In
y! - 49,, ',..S,,rt,y afternoon Re-
Grammar 'o"', S. ,,,,r,,, /
turned Il verdict "h"'"E N'''' NY
= O'Er:'u not guilty "' lhS '''' $500
fraud charge on Which ne WAS Pi','"
80, trial ~ criminal court MONDAY. lh'
-" ,s f,uud without, the lur>
N''"'N 49,, ,,,,, .i,.n,I hy MI
'rAN'hE '.e ''\' "',,' ,,r,,,,,, =,
liam y ftahN'N' '"' I"'i
- "'vl"Ck. ,.,.
When thc sat" rested ''H'''N
Jly Afternoon. Attorney tr|HN y.
,,.i,r;,,, ,.r,> assisted IN the, defense -
T,,,.,r ,,,o,...l ., ,>,l,,u, thu, states
NJ ''''"> 49,. -, St,tr had
"Nih'N''' "'' ."'"N ~. ,,., >, show
failed t" pro"u'" any 'E'"'" ~
that J. !. l. q Erlcn hAh '"b"N''' ,"' "
vi<cd and aided SH,hy Jones. an erection
rro,.i,., = ~ III. Second wHrl.
'''rN az ., no ,,,a,lr ~:
1" '""H' ~ r.,ns !. ,;iIl;.au for
the vote cast Tor "'' It. 49,, wa
council IN the Second ward 90 'h'' , Pm
rinct IN the general ruN erection" ~"
MAY %. judge Robinson sustained "a"
-, .I dirr.,rd IN, Jury - md the
.''''" - t,,. nat vu;lty
former citH S"iIt''"' ~
No Evidence by Iva ,,
No evidence in defense W w. ~.
satinn looked aGaiU~, Mr.. v fr''h 'S
49, ra,,,,,h.r Grand Jury was present
me "'tt' '"'' ' .o,,,s,r rho motion
"d bN Tue "s''"' -. ,,.;G.r.., follow
70 exclude the S'"'' ',,,,,, ,b,t
ing Immediately the a"uo"'''''"'"'
rho state had rested.
49,. ,I ,r.cr,.J ,n move before the
-, ',.,,, - ,ourt Yesterday. ~
""1','' =, which Mr., D'Rricn
puaSh tne 'n"rS' - 49,, rbic:
* L.
hurley Thompson on an A''uS'"',' St'.
,n,iIv idcnriral with the charge OF
htE NJ D.I.r,,r MIS- freed Yesterday
WIN 81 ,, ,,,r,.cf ,hr ind
In IT," '"h'"SI'' ''''' ,,I...;,nr M,
ing ct the '"''n'r '''H ,,,,,oI
guilty. however. TINS stop WIS
Yesterday. Attorney j NJ l""' w
nErjcn.s counsel. >.tid las, evening thai
ms motion wii, bc offered 1T the carl
lest opportunity
when ,hn verdict arQUittuS III" form
or tiiy solicitor had been read an" 'n'
Jury ,li>rh2 reed. Prosecuting Attorney
Carl -. Rarhuann. MS assistants 'N"H-
tin V Wood Ind Clinton L. |"'"P''"'
anil the members of III" jury wire
among tho very iir~t I" m1h" thc.r way
Ia the dcfcllS" counsel table ana "Itr
their congratulations :" Mr. > H''t"'
Frank oBrten's Flea
IL moving 10 exclude IN" STATE 'N'-
deuce and direct th'' jury I" return i
Verdict finding his "rothHr n"t Eu'.tE'
Attorney Frank y. - hTieh S''" ~ >"e
Court. IN part:
For the purposes OF tu.s 80 AL
S''u' Eoit : ,",S 49, nh, o. ,ll.u,,.
.Ir'Mjy sho,,s mar This defendant. then
liz Sollc,tnr OF tn. city OF WhecliuE.
did what he should have done. dlu whtt
any official worthy " inc 'rtNl "ou.G
have unn"--trOuHht l" the 'INc"t'o" VI
the "ttl'i%I 'inpoMeteu /" az i"' I'm
FORMATION '""t ~" t,,,,'t ILL say
t,'"ue !" go 70 49,, had his defendant
not taken l'ctcrsua Ia Mr.. la'hmann
had he not thus called to the attention
OF the prosecutor N" c't'"!nN '''n," N''. .
a voter VINO haG es.n IN r's no roT,TS
Sn,t. '.H..,.n n,stiv subject 10 indtct-
n,,.n, and PROSECUTION
In reply to Mr.. O'Ertcn. Assistant
Prosecuting Attorney Wood Sii'd tnat ne
d SHsrcrd Nlt" t"' 'it.''o.
WIN 1879, s,o", %nur honor" he
,.,,I ..,r',, ,ber, WAS an election held.
iT.,t m. return gaIe Gul,guu 80 votes
and that SciGy Jones' name appeared on
tEr hack 81 all the ballots. We haNn
shown ~ o.'' ",''.''" ~ ~, t.i,iSg.n
".'"rSrS 80. 80 n,cr,. rc,,u-
-, ,Nrk,r.. on . LIrS. nuy,.h.r ~ the
h.,Iln;~. ,hruusu IT, witness Peterson.
WITH respect /" Mr.. p,i::"2 part.
agrce with the deems" 'Aat - ns 49,,