The Birmingham age-herald., 1921-03-19
DIVIDED SENTIMENT ON
 AMENDMENT INDICATED
 IN-P0LL OF LEGISLATORS
fContinued from Page one)

v is high taxes and depressed financial conditions.
 "P. S.-In talking with represent ative men from all parts of the county today, I don't believe the amendment could win.
 ELMORE
 R. L. Huddleston, senator from Tenth district: "Deatsville March IT, 1921.= T am just recovering from an at tack of pneumonia and have not dis cussed with the. people as to whether they would vote for a new bond issue for good roads. Will say. however that in the last election with stren- uous campaign made for the bond issue, and only one writing against it. it was signally defeated in this county. You may judge from that"
 HALE
 W. c. Christian. representative from Hale county: "Greensboro March II. 1921. Hard for me to answer your ques- tion satisfactorily to myself Our peo- pie are depressed. and the future looks gloomy to them, and doubt very much whether any kind of an amendment, even good roads amendment, would get their support"
 LAUDERDALE
 B. A. Rogers, senator from First dis trict; Florence. March IT, 1921.-- Tn my Judgment. a resubmission of the road bond amendment would be ratified by the people. provided no other amendment was submitted at that time.
 ."If more than one amendment was proposed, it would tend to confuse the voters and many would attack 1t on the ground that 1t was some yelled scheme to further increase taxation"
 LAWRENCE
 w. H. Smith. senator from Second district Town Creek. March Is. 1921. T think Lawrence county would give majority in favor of bond issue for building roads if submitted. Don't be- lieve the majority would be as great as in the first election. This county is shot to pieces and everybody is eau tious."
 LAWRENCE | D. H. Bracken, representative from Lawrence county: 'Mouton. March IT, 1921. 1.ssLawrence county has never failei to vote for this amendment although the last majority was small think. however. that can be attributed to the ruling of the supreme court few days 1 prior to the election
 Therefore, I am sure you can count on this county going two te one in favor of such an amendment and may we here express our desire that such an amendment be put before the voters as early as possible
 Expressing our willingness to CO., | operate in putin gthis over. I am. ] yours very truly"
 LIMESTONE
 J. R. Christopher, representative from Limestone county. Athens March II, is2lMy belief is that it would carry in Limestone county by fairly good ma jority-"
 MACON
 William Warner, representative, from Macon eounty. 'sTuskegee, March IS, 1s.1-I have tried to ascertain the feeling in this county, and believe 1t would re- quire only a small amount of work throughout the county to pass the good roads amendment. but believe If an eff fort is made to pass the port amendment again, it will take the good roada amend ment down in defeat with it. It would not do to bring anything before the peo- pie at this time because they are incensed over the taxes. Let that feeling die, which will require only short lime after the payment of the taxes, ii, MONROE
 Riley Kelly. senator from Fwenty-first district; Excel. March H. 1921 The sem timent of our best citizens IS that 1t would hardly be possible at the present for Monroe county to vote majority in favor of a good road anand@sps ' 4