Grand Forks herald. [volume] (Grand Forks, N.D.) 1916-1955, 1921-07-09

tsrs ana another bank sniploye ii
The bank and was in the bank at the
time the notes wereSgcn%st the table
under discussion, handled some Of the
notes, ana VA there when the notes
were packed In grip ard taken back
togFsrgo by Sherman. 5 49,
The sstats made a general Aental3o 81
this charge 10 its formal reply but in
the evidence presented dlftng the
ton we're sent to the Bank OF Meth
Dakota, and clalnaed that sthey Had
not been accepted ~ Mr.. cathrp and
were sentssby him back TO the Scan
Observation-Disclosures bank
That there was q discussion II this
time al to the policy Of putdng
League paper into the Rank9of North
Dakota.
the state denied any discussion
oyer such 4 policy policy; sss53
ThAt William I4snake,* Z. w cathroi
ardeA. G.. Townley took the position
that the placing 81 League paper in
ths$Bank Of North Dakota was en-
tireM Legitimate, while grinton and
taking the position that It vas
NSAA&A 0&8SSp OASSSstsaE14, 49,
ters also claimed that " was Grim
ina.
The state denied that Letnke,
a tiaa ,o ssGs m neMs'ey c,a tees t e B g9s,-
ton.
Is. q
THAT Lerake and Brinton had an
argument over this question Of policy
on the train between Bismarck and
rstafAs 1enfAd anv siIch CONVEX
a+.ana -. ~ -" ~;
-: -.
rh.. = 80. aIr.aa,, rayarraA "a
n,ara a. Ia psrk nf sNorfhSnakota
Iort a .aay % I'VE ahn thas .Hs 7 %
.ns nsvusAt Y .s,e .ns4's We t.a.ian
s.i. = tne asIss.iiet, =. n.e - - -
~ Lnell Fen.naeoy+! ne ie AsA =
opposition !of anether
lhe ssta.e l = tns D J Ia y
a a .as nos ssn lfo g F sae sG e the Bgnk
OF North DAKOTA n then peing sent
back was duesto = such cause a.
that assigned BY
~.
That Rrinton showed 70 GoVernoI
Lynn y. Frazier 2 stypswritten SIP
bearing memoranda regarding ,-sosae
OF these notes N auesaon; $780,
The state denied THIS, U tne gov.
ernor IN ms gtestiMohs aiu TO- see ei,
posttsVer fatshe feadssnere seen ~
memorandum IN 4uestlon.
-ls e.
der which the Bank OF North Dakota
was 70 seno money 70 the noln
ian-Amerlcan panK as epos,ss ara a.
cans and in,thas way ioan ne 1usa'
OF TINS stAteEto the various teague IN.
OF tne state Srlnton c.aiEninH &c nav
The state denied n such pole.
was agreed upon.
- 10.
That A. q. ToMoley told Efan.o1
that we want MI. Cathfo IN IN
nank oeeause ne mas greco TO sa-
Win s. 49,. ro,1
ley dlo nor turr' up 70 tes.ity, no .eyl
dence was presenaea on 1H1s sPo1nt.
=
Iha1 Wilaam LEN Lssn kaem ano 'a as'
proved of"the&poNey OF ta'
league corporataons iron. = sanH Q
North 4 IN n descrioe
3 Brinton.
was denied by ne STATE.
q.
That FUNDS We're taEen ON u
hbanR OF Nortn Dakota to#a pr!NaL
bank at Fargo ana were there rals sp
propriated enbezzleo-
TO this the state entered a genera
denial
q.
Tnat the empezzlenent JUST reIer
red to consisted IN: the taxing OF STAT
funds by a certain Arrangement an
their use for persona Eand poi'nnA
4 purposes. "
AGAIN n state eontented itsea1 Val!
a. general DENIAL. /,
~. !
That William LenaEe was with 9
e: Lofthus N charge OF the scan
following William hangers fannou
RAG IN . ta!i Q! !Sls.
q STATE oenicd tas. LeHtke wa
IN any way IN charge OF Ing 2
-
~. auEIHg INC .lsHe .nat q
sssIaa aslIn-. oa aaia "" q
ItpaSu, o..o"1IS s.as
1920 49," .-I;o assai.H5SEs
~ ~ . "a 49, te4sarAsn h.n;
~ rs Minrssna,i ~ ~ ~ - "a. .sat
x1nrarGA cn,,rtsn,iyr .TxsAfvs6 M
hei;avinp that. a. note of.9+ne TTrjta
!. States Seal Truet had heen raid :.
!. more favorable showing thus bein
made Tor the OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES
!. bank than would otherwise be Dos
sible.
That this check. according to Brtn