Indiana daily times. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1914-1922, 1921-06-02

ing to the complaint, are bound to con-
form to the provisions of the contracts
and the orders Of the union.
On June l, 1920, the plaintiffs and the
defendants entered into a contract which
was to become operative on June l, 1920,
and continue in effect until June 1, 1921,
and 'in the event a new contract has not
been negotiated at the expiration Of said
year then said contract was to continue
in full force and effect until such new
contract has been negotiated"
PLAINTIFF GAVE
NOTIFICATION OF CUT.
On March 81, 1921, the plaintiffs notified
the defendants that at the expiration of
the contract there would be a demand
made for a reduction in the scale Of
wages for mailers.
A committee was appointed from both
organizations with the result, accord
ing to the complaint, that the committees
wholly failed TO agree and could not
come to any understanding with refer
ence to the terms Of the new contract"
On May 81, last, the representatives Of
the Mailers' Union notified the plaintiffs
that strike would be ordered to go
into effect on June 1 or soon afterwards.
The plaintiffs state in the complaint
that the Mailers' Union No. 10 of Indi-
annapolis and the executive committee Of
the International Typographical Union.
are planning TO inaugurate a strike and
TO keep mailers employed by these plain
lifts from working until the demands Of
the Mailers' Union No. 10 are fully com
piled with by the plaintiffs.
WOULD CLOSE nowN
MANY DEPARTMENTS.
The plaintiffs declare that II such
strike was called and went into effect
that the plaintiffs would be unable TO
continue many OF their departments In
their several plants.
The complete list OF the plaintiffs is as
follows: Barnes-Gault Company. the
Barnes Ross Company. Bookwalter- Ball
Printing Company, Britain & Son, VIII
liam b. BurfOrd. doing business as VIII
liam B. Burford Company; Otis L. Black
well and NJ. NJ. Oakley, doing business
as Capital Blank Book Company; Arthur
D. o'Connor, doing business as The
Centennial Press; The Chic Press: Clay
Trusty, doing business as Community
Publishing House; John Cullum, doing
business IS Cullum Linotype Company;
Enquirer Printing and Publishing Com
pany; The Franklin Press; William H
Hampton; Timothy Harrington and John
Folger, doing business as Harrington 4
Folger; George Haverstick, doing bust
ness as The Haverstick Company; The
Hollenbeck Press; William Hansman, do
ing business as Indianapolis Printing
Company; Robert Hinkle. doing business
rs Indianapolis Stock Journal; Walter E.
Playter, doing business as Indianapolis
Typesetting Company; Thomas E. Han
sen, doing business as Inland Typesetting
Company; The keystone Press; George
t. Krass, doing business as George T.
Krass Company; The Lockman Binding
Company; Mellett Printing Company;
The Multiple Press Mutual Printing and
Lithographing Company; Charles Near
thur, doing business as Macarthur ESling
Company Charles Nankervis, doing bust
ness as c. T. Nankervls Company; Fred
B. Nen, doing business as F. B. NeT
Printing Company; Arthur D. Pratt and
Hyland Pratt, doing business as Pratt
Poster Company; Premier Printing Com
pany; Jay T. Rogers and Porter NJ
rogers, doing business as Rogers Type
setting Company; The Rough Notes Com
pany; Sentinel Printing Company; Harry
L. S!elken and George W. Faulstick, do
ing business as Sielken & Faulstick; Os-
car Thomas and William Evans, doing
business as Thomas & Evans; William
Printing Company Fred NJ. Meiere Com
pany; Caldwell Printery; Cornelius
Printing Company, and Merchants Print
Ing Company.
All the plaintiffs are doing business
under the firm name aud style or
Closed shop Division Of Indianapolis
Typc+hetae.
The defendants are as follows: Omar
Lambert, president Of Mailers' Union,
No. 10 Of indianapolis; John White. sec
rotary: Adam Hoeger, William Shawl and
Dave Jesse as members of the executive
committee, and John Mcfarland, Walter
W. Barrett, James J. Hoban, Charles n.
Loucks, ]. Guy Jacks, Leona Rutledge,
Richard Hollester, NJ. X. Gray. Charles
N. Smith, Hugo Miller, John w. Hays,
Gertrude Fahrtack and Sevender Borch-
ers.
The defendants are doing business
under the firm name and style of Mailers'
Union No. 10, of indianapolis, Ind, and
International Typographical Union.