The Hartford herald. [volume] (Hartford, Ky.) 1875-1926, 1921-09-28
Ohio CIRCUIT COURT
ORAWING TO A CLOSE
Will Likely Adjourn Tomorrow;
Roy Hines Draws Fine and
Imprisonment.

and a number of cases, both civil
and criminal, have been disposed of
during the term. The jury has been
discharged and it is likely that
court will adjourn tomorrow.
The following Commonwealth
cases have been tried: by a jury:
Com. VS.. Roy Hines, indicted for
selling liquor; verdict guilty and
punishment fixed at fine of SIS and
80 days in Jail.
| Com. VS.. Roy Hines. charged with
selling liquor; verdict of guilty and
given fine of $125 and 40 days in
Jail.
Com. VS.. Roy Hines, charged with
keeping liquor for sale, fined $50
and given 80 days in Jail.
Com. VS.. Roy Hines, charged with
selling liquor; verdict of not guilty.
Com. VS.. Roy Hines, charged with
selling liquor; verdict of guilty, Civ
en- fine of $50 and 80 days in Jail.
Com. VS.. Roy Hines, charged with
Transporting liquor; given 500 fine
and 80 days in Jail
Com. VS.. Clarence Aull, indicted
for deserting infant children. YER
| dict of guilty and punishment fixed
a in
| In the case of the Com. VS.. Thomas
Taught, charged with operating a
mOonshine still, the defendant en-
tered plea of guilty, the law and
facts were submitted to the Court
and his punishment was fixed at
fine of $3.50 and 10 days in Jail.
In the case of the Commonwealth
VS.. The Beaver Dam Coal Co., the
defendants demurrer to thes indict-
ment was sustained and the prosecu-
tion was dismissed. whereupon the
| Commonwealth prayed an appeal to
the Court of Appeals. which was
granted. This case will be taken to
the Appellate Court at once for the
purpose of testing the constitution
ality of the law requiring coal COM
panies to furnish employees with
wash rooms, for the violation of
which the defendant was indicted.
The same charge was the basis OF
another prosecution against the
same company and similar prosecu-
tions against the Render Coal Co.,
Rockport Coal Co., Broadway Coal
Mining Co. and Holt Bros. Coal
Mining Co. The last five cases were
continued until the End. day OF the
Nov. term, after demurrers had been
overruled.
Among the civil causes disposed
of were the following:
Hinkle Shoe company VS.. IT. c.
Stratton, verdict for plaintiff.
Butler Bros. VS.. Otho Dexter. ver-
dict for plaintiff for $65.
Standard Candy company VS.. Otho
Dexter, verdict for plaintiff in the
sum of $65. -w~.i
Crescent Grocery company VS..
James Laws, verdict for plaintiff
for $264
Cal p. Keown VS.. Mrs. John Mea-
dows, verdict for plaintiff for $6S.-
55.
John S. Daugherty was granted a
divorce from Mary ]. Daugherty.
j. j. Jarnagin VS.. Bond Tie COM
pany. suit involving a claim for
$1,000. on a tie contarct. Jury re-
turned verdict for defendant.
Acme Jones Co. VS.. w. e. Ellis,
&c, new trial refused and appeal
to Court of Appeals granted.
w. j. Mercer VS.. S. B. HUFF, sub
mitted to Court and judgment rem
dered for $74.5s. interest and costs.
Isabelle Hughes VS.. Riley Hughes,
dismissed without prejudice, upon
plaintiffs motion.
In the consolidated cases OF Flem-
ing II. Douthitt vs.. Thomas Harri-
son and George Phiprs VS.. Thomas
Harrison. the plaintiff, Phipps. was
awarded a judgment for $3.50, Gre
dited by s65, adjudged lien upon
two mules. which were ordered sold
to satisfy 1t.
Holbrook q Parks VS.. Frick 4
Lindsay Co.; jury returned verdict
for plaintiff for $957.40.
Irma r. Taught VS.. Ronda Taught,
set to the 10th. day for hearing on
plaintiffs motion for s25 per month
temporary alimony.
Pearl Baird VS.. John w. Baird,
dismissed without prejudice. upon
plaintiffs motion.
The cases OF Corbet Legrand VS..