The Connecticut labor news., 1921-12-23

Finally after nearly two days argu- ment a modified injunction, absoIvlng the (. l.. l.. was granted by Judge Kellogg. The injunction is as fol- lows:
 " he Post Publishing Co. vs. Typo
 graphical Union No. 252, 1t As.
 Superior Court, Fairfield County,
 December 21, 1921.
 'Order Upon Motion to Dissolve ln-
 junction.
 "On the motion of the detendants to dissolve the temporary injunction the parties, having been heard III part, have stipulated and agreed that the injunction as heretofore issued should be modified to read as follows:
 "Whereupon 1t is Ordered and Ad- judged, that the said Typographical Union No. 252, a voluntary assocla- ton located i'll the city of Bridgeport, State ot Connecticut, Frank r. t1tz- gerald and Robert Earring, lndivldu- ally, and as officers of 1ypographl- cal Union Mo- 252, Joseph Iimko, Thomas J. Helman, Herbert Hans man, John E. Mills, Wilbert o. Jacob, Charles Bierbaum, Louis Hateie and William A. Jephcote, all ot sald Bridgeport, each and every one ot them and their officers, servants, agents and employees, and each and every one of them are commanded and enjoined under d penalty ot one thousand dollars, to wholly and ab- Solutely desist and refrain from m tertering with the procurement ot employees by the plaintiff, and from interfering with its business as con ;,, with newspaper establishment, composing room and print shop, located on Mid dle street i'll the city ot Bridgeport, by patroling, or picketing, or lettering upon the streets, or near the alleys, or on the property Tn the vicinity or on leading to said plant and property of the plaintiff, the Post Publishing company, for the purpose ot prevent ing, either by threats, intimidation, or other like act, any person or per sons who were then or might there after be in its employment or deslr- ous of entering such employment |from entering into or. continuing in such employment and from obstruct- ing or interfering with such persons in approaching, entering, or leaving the plaintiffs said newspaper estab lShment; act, express or implied, any person or persons who were then, or might thereafter be, Ill the employ ment of the plaintiff or deslrous ot entering the same, from entering or continuing in such employment; and from annoying, hindering, interfering with, or preventing by any other scheme or device, by combination or conspiracy among themselves or with others organized for that purpose, +l or might thereafter be, in the em- ployment of the plaintiff or desirous of entering the same, from entering or continuing therein, and from con spring or combining among them selves. or with others organized for such purpose, for the purpose of compelling the plaintiff by intimida ton or threats, or interfering with or injuring the business or. the plan, of the plaintiff, to either Employ or discharge such person or persons in it's business as the defendants or any of them might dictate or direct and against the will or desire of the plaintiff; and from threats or acts of intimidation and injury to the plain tiff $ business or newspaper estab lishment, composing room and print shop, and from interfering by any of the means aforesaid with the plaintiff in the due and proper conduct of its business.
 Provided, however, that nothing contained in the foregoing order of injunction shall prevent the 1nterna- tional Typographical Union or said Typographical Union No. 252 from prohibiting and forbidding it's own members to work in the newspaper establishment composing room or print shop of the plaintiff" "