The Washington herald., 1921-03-18
COURT OF APPEALS.

IOlhL OE AIE481<
: Present = chief Justice smyth.
Justice van orsdel q Justice Hitz.
II the Dist supr Court.
The following were admitted to
. practice In this court: Halbert =.
Brown. Henry s. Chick q Richard
.. Welch-
1908 solomon VS. Rouss: f4o4. Sol.
,mon W Rouss. Pet.for eertiorari
fubmtd by Joshua X II. Potts In
rupport Of pet 4 by VIM F. Hall In
= sppostn thereto. denied, Argmt
.ontd BY ]. r. H. Potts for appellee
4 soneluded by VIM. +. Hail for
lpplnt-
a.. 1907 Browning vs. Johnson. Asgmt
s .omcd for apint by Melville Church.
.ontd for aplee by Richard Eyre q
, .oncld for applnt by VIM II. Ken
ron.
As.iEnnent.for Today.
Patent Appeal Cases Nos l4os,
'sl40s & 141o. 1411. 1412. 1413. i415.
's141s. 141s. 1920 & 1921.
DISTRICT SUPREME COURT.
CIRCUIT DIVISION No. 1.
! PROCEEDINGS.
60S2s Brooks VS. w. B. & A. Elec
Ry Co. Trial reshmed & verdict for
pltf for $500. Baker. Miller, Leahy,
0'Leary & observation-disclosures &
, raliaferro.
sos2s waller VS. w. B. & A. Elec
by Co. Trial resumed q verdict
Lsahy, O'Leary q Neudecker-Lit-
tlepage a Taliaferro.
s0s54 WoolSey VS. Stern ct al. Or
nral min naffnn nf rar-
aishee March Is. 1891. E. II. Jack
son-Baker & Staggert, attys.
so5oe Farmers & Merchants Bk
W Sager ct al. Order for oral ex-
animation Of garnishee on March
IS. 1891. E. H. Jackson, atty for
pltf.
s5329 U. 8. ex rel Lyon VS. Sec'y
Of War. Order substituting John
W. Weeks as respndt. Hearing on
answer to rule set for March 81,
1921. at 1880 p. m. Jesse /. Miller
Q. s. Atty. attys.
65051 Knabe warerooms VS. Yates.
Judgt by dflt for possession & cAe
sent damages & costs VS. deft. A.
y. Presmont, atty for pltf.
si1Is Franklin Natl Bank VS. Co.'S
tello. Judgt by diff VS. deft for
s5l7.ss. with int from August IL
1919. & costs.
s2ss3 Moore VS. Parvin ct al
Judgt by dit VS. deft BeaIl for
$500 with int from June ,, 1920, 4
costs
ss11s wood VS. Supreme Lodge
knights Of Pythias. Pitt called q
suit dismissed with costs. w. G
observation-disclosures & Taliaferro
attys-
enet7 S- 49, -.
called suit dismissed with costs
Scott & Colladay-C. F. Diggs. at
tys.
CIRCUIT DIVISION NO. 1.
Motions for Today.
1 Eichelberger VS. & Tel Co
Lambert & Yeatman-Kenyon 4
Mcfarland. attys.
Thornton VS. Wash Ry & Ele
Co. Newymer-whitefor attys.
son Maury vs. Logan. Darr, White
ford & Darr-Grant, attys.
4 Snow VS. Reus. McGlue-
Bowies. attys.
s walker & Co VS. Rodier. Archie
q Smith-McNsmara, attys
Hills VS. So Ry Co. Peters
Hamilton & Hamilton. attys.
Baretz VS. Rosendorf. Bastail
q MarSn-F0Wler.
,1 8 Shea VS. New Taxi Co. Gardi
ner & Proctor-Newmyer. attys
Shea VS. New Taxi Co. Gardi
ner & Proctor-Newmyer, attys.
10 Grady vs. Roberts. McGlue-
Hudson, attys.
IL Grady vs. Farrall. McGlue-
Hudson. attys-
12 Payne VS. Magee. Mullen
Hamilton Hamilton. attys.
IL Walker VS. Burnham. Wheat
ley-Bradley, attys.
IA Goldman VS. Brown. Sullivan
Boyd. attys.
Is Stern vs. Creamer ct al. King
Simon Young-Ferguson. attys.
Is Snow VS. Barr. AcGlue-
Bauman. attys-
II Hermann vs. Miller. Raffer
ty-Hudson. attys-
Is Dick VS. Sec'y Interior. Sher
fen-Hamilton & Hamilton, attys.
IS Fleming & Heavley VS. Burea,
Of Com Econmcs. Ralston & viii
lis-Mather, attys.
20 Satterwhtie vs. Maryland Cas-
ualty Co. woodward-wiIliam
Clark. attys.
81 Mcdonald VS. Colson. Linkin
& Hutcherson-Hudson attys.
y
Sullivan & Gertman-McKenner
Flsnnery & Craighill, attys.
% Bough VS. Kann Sons & c.
Sullivan & Gertman-McKenne
F1annery & Crsishill, attys.
20 Dimisa VS. Reynolds. Grant
Hudson. attys.
.as IS Glickman VS. Pointer. Lovin
q Hammer-King, Simon & Youns
attys.
Is Cook vs. Bartram- Conlon
Cook-Guy, attys.
81 Gellman VS. Brown. Sulliva
& Davis-Boyd. attys.
2S Atkinson VS. Malakatis. JET
fords &c Dutton-Thomaides. atty
80 Campbell VS. Lott. Strasbur
ger & Rappaport-Turnage attys.
.a. 30 Ryan, VS. Lindeau. Stricklan
4 Hart. attys.
+, IL Shea VS. Carter. Fahy-Hud
son. attys.
% Shea vs. Miller. Fahy-Hud
son. attys.
33 Espensheid vs. Met Bank {
wash. Bailey-Ralston q will
attys.
"a Hellmuth vs. Weber. colls
day & Pettus-Clarke, attys.
IS Nat Met Bank VS. Cap TT C,
Rosenberg & weiner-Dunlap, atty,
3s Walker C Co VS. Mason. Hut
-ehinson-Hudson, attys.
81 Shapiro vs. Peters. Ottenberl
Hudson, attys.
% Sullivan " Scott. Davis
lang, attys.
80 Lewis vs. Wash Ry q Elec c,