Oxford Democrat., 1921-05-24
supreme Judicial Court.

Fifty-fOur persons were naturallzeu ~
the May term OF Supreme judicial Court
at Rumford, as follows:
Rumford-William Blanchard, Henri
Arsenault, Arthur Patmande, Adelsrd
Cyr. Robert E. Griffin, Adam Johnston,
George Thernault, John W. Waddingtop,
Clement Theberge, Julian P. Jensen,
Angus G. Neal, Charles A. Myer, Eddie
Gallant, Peter Cunningham, Peter Me-
lanson, George R. Chambers, Louis Dill
Ion. Alfred Gomez Sousa, Jacob r. He
bert, Ellie j. Gaudet, Emile Berube,
Adam Jurgielevicz, Joseph Tangusy,
Henry Breault, Frank Arsenault, Charles
Paul, Gedion Provost, Jerome |. Ber-
nard, Eloi Richard, Adolph Dalbre, 10.
seph q. Ouellstte, Joseph Damase, Ar
thur Plourde, Alyre Meumer, Joseph
Patric Clohesey, James McCleary, Will
liam A. McInnis, Horace Brule, Arcade
Richards.
Mexico-Thomas P. Aylnare, Artkinan
Campbell, Peter Gsudreau, Goetano Fl
oroni, George L. Dumeny, Alvie DrOin,
Wesley n. Leckey, August Pellet, An
drew Arsenault, Charles G. Concrad, Jo-
seph NJ, Arsenault, Vincent Poirier.
Peru-Esbjorn Wikie.
Cantou-Loreuzo Lavorgna, Mike On
Roxbury-Jobn Peter Blanchard.
In the case of James Gallant vs. Law.
renee Peterson, which was on trial when
the Democrats court report was made
up, which was damsge case In an acci-
dent of automobiles, verdict was re.
turned for the plaintiff In the sum OF
1896. The lawyers engaged In this case
were George A. Hutchins and Nathan IT,
Foster for plaintiff and Albert Beiiveau
and Matthew Mccarthy for defendant.
There was another automobile damage
case tried at Rumford, that OF John War
rem vs.. Turner Center System, and In
this the plaintiff received $l03. O6 dam
ages. A. E. Stearps appeared, for plain
tiff and Ralph Parker tor defendant.
The case of s. 8. Trip VS.. Julius T.
Skilliugs was q suit to recover ooard
bill. and the verdict returned Was for the
full amount of the bill. q. b. Hastings
appeared for Tripp and Alton G. Wheeler
for Skillings.
A verdict of s216 SO was given Tony
Albrecbt. who sued John Wiskont. for
5000 alleged to have been taken from
him. Albert Belivesu was Albrechts
LAWYER and George A. Hutchins was Wis
| kont's.
La Croix & Poulin, real estate dealers,
brought an action against Xavier Boivin
to recover the amount OF note given ior
the sale of the defendants house. Yer
dict, $211 o., A. <. Stearns for plaintin,
and Albert Beliveau for defendant.
On Wednesday morning the case OF
ARTHUR Whitman vs. Mark Allen came to
1 trial. This was q case to recover the
price of Ford truck valued at $500 and
Ford touring car valued at $400. This
action was brought on the ground that
whitman was not of age at the time ol
certain transactions; also that he was
not competent to transact business be
cause of insanity. The case was taken
from the jury by order Of Judge Phil
brook and sent to the Law court. Altor
G. Wheeler appeared for plaintiff and d
q. Hastings for defendant.
The case of Charles Z. Hadley 70. Fl
den T. Carey was for the value OF year
ling heifsr claimed to amount to $20(
ltecause she was full blOoded, regis
tered animal. Hadley was leading hel
along the road In Sumner when care!
came along ip an auto driving very fast
according to Hadley, and hit her, break
ing her leg, and causing her to be killed
Carey denied driving at excessive speet
aud claimed to use due care In passing
! the animal. he says the heifer alone
, responsible for the accident. The jur.
found for defendant. An appeal wa
, fled. FIR. Dyer appeared for plaintiff
and Alton G. Wheeler for defendant.
The case Thursday morning was Hel
bert L. Amss vs. Sewell A. Mayhem :
recover SITS for services In moving
building In the town of Mexico. Th
defendant claimed the building Was NO
: delivered according to contract. Tb
Jury returned verdict for the SITS plu
interest, in all amounting to $lSS. N. G
!; Foster appeared for plaintiff and Ma
! thew MCCARTHY for defendant.
Thursday afternoon Frederick L. Ra
appeared against the Dupont Powde
Co. In Q case involving 5000 for dan
Q ages. This was quite an extended cast
. some seventeen witnesses being calle
BY the plaintiff and FIVE by the defent
ant. Hon. Frank A. Morey of Lewisto
!, was plaintiffs lawyer, while Bradle!
j, Linnell & Jones Of Portland appeare
for defendants.