Norwich bulletin., 1921-11-19
FORECLOSURE GRANTED IN
SCHWARTZ VS.. zAvovITAs

Judgment by stipulation for foreclosure
in the sum Of s50.S7 was entered in the
superior court motion list session here
Friday morning in the case of Louis
Schwartz VS.. Demetrios Zavoritas and
others.
Two applications by Receiver Robert
". Perkins of the Shore Line Electric
Railway Co. were also granted. one
amending an order authorizing him to.
sell certain land in the town Of Gull
ford, and the other allowing him to quit
claim certain land in Guilford to Har-
rison Hewitt, administrator de bonis non
cum testamanto annexo of the estate of
John Beattie
Other matters on the motion list which
was before Judge George E. Human
were disposed of as folcSs:
Dean H. Richards VS.. Iona c. Rich
ards. That plaintiff be held in contempt
of court for failure to comply with an
order as to payment Of alimony pendente
lite, postponed.
Worth VS.. Herbert E. Ring, Inc. Or
der accepting inventory and appraisal.
and for allowance to appraisers, post
poned
Schwartz vs. Zavoritas, ct al. Dis
closure Of defense or Judgment, off.
Dawson VS. Lumcchansky. Judgment,
off.
Harris VS.. Allen, ct al. Judgment post
poned
Mariana vs. New London Bakery &
Delicatessen Co. Order for dividend, post
poned.
| Macarthur vs. Sha1ett. Disclosure of
i defense or Judgment, postponed.
Richard Kiley VS.. Elizabeth Brown XII
| ley Allowance to defend, .s35, 900 in 80
days. 2 Alimony pendente lite, 81 per
| week from Nov. II.
Ralph L Main vs. Sadi NJ Main That
plaintiff show cause why he should not
be committed for contempt, off.
| Mary Danko VS.. John Danke. That de-
| PENDANT chow cause why he should not
be committed for contempt off.
Hazel Nelson Knapp VS.. Frederick r
Knapp. Alimony pendente lite. postpon-
ed.
| Mary Tyler Brown VS.. Walter Brown
Second order of notice, granted.
| Adam J. Cronesberry VS.. Elizabeth H
Cronesberry That order of curt for
payment for alimony, pendente lite be
rescinded and revoked. Judge took the
papers.
Katie A Purcell vs. William H. Pur-
cell. Hearing on application of defend
ant for custody of Julia Purcell. Judge
took the papers.
Katie A. Purcell vs. William H Purcell
Alimony pendete lite, off.
Murray VS.. Croker House Corp. De
fault for failure to plead, pleadings in
one week.
Breton Iron Works vs. City of New
London. 1 Motion to strike plea to iur.
isdiction from file, off. Default for fail
ure to plead, pleadings in two weeks.
Hende1 VS.. Mallech. Disclosure Of
defense. 2 Judgment. Limitation of time
for redemption, postponed.
! Constance L. Meyer VS.. Joseph P Noy
er. Alimony pendente lite, postponed.
/ Mary Santacroce VS.. James Santacroce
| The defendant be held in contempt fol
neglect to comply with order of cour
! as to payment of alimony pendente lite
4 postponed.
/ Phoebe A. Miller vs. Louis W. Miller
Alimony pendente lite, postponed
Adams Steel Products Corneration VS.
Mccarthy, ct al. Default for failure t,
answer, pleadings in one week
George Staples Treadway vs. Norri
M Treadway. That the defendant b.
held for contempt for failure to com
ply with the order of court relative tt
the payment of alimony, postponed
Grace Crawford Messenger vs. William
S. Messenger. Second order of notice
granted
peterson VS.. Helen peterson.
Permission to amend complaint, granted
Order of notice. to be by registers
mail in one week
Edna ]. Bowe Brown vs. Herman T
Brown. That defendant be held in con
tempt of court for, failure to compl
with order as to payment of alinon
pendente lite, postponed.
/ Massey VS.. Massey. Dissolution O
temporary Injunction, granted. 2 Erasur
of case from docket, erased.
Worth VS.. Herbert E. Ring, Inc. Or
der for expenses and compensation t
former counsel for receiver. POSTPONED
Wrobel, Admir- VS.. Blinderman. Motto
to set aside verdict and for a new tria
postponed.
Carl Hopf vs. Flora Clark Hopf Tha
plaintiff be held in contempt of court fo
failure to comply with order for nav
J ment of alfmony pendente lite and of a
lowance to defend postponed
Shea VS.. Gavitt Motion to erase fo
want of party plaintiff, postponed.
F'irmin VS.. Hedlund. Motion to eras
for want of a party plaintiff, postpor
i ed.
Neleber vs. Colchester Farm Produc
Co. That claim of George C. Fabel /
allowed as preferred. Judge took tt
4 papers.
Joseph VS.. Tiffany. 1 Argument of d,
! murrer. 2 Motion for more specific stat,
! ment. postponed.
4 Williamson, Adns. VS.. New York, Ne
4 Haven and Hartford Railroad Co. Plail