Audubon County journal. (Exira, Iowa) 1884-1993, 1921-11-10

Tertullus, perhaps Roman barris-
ter, formally made the accusation ac-
cording to Roman law. He began with
f1attery. He gave Felix the fullest
praise when he and all the people
knew that he lied; for Felix was one
of the worst governors-destitute Of
morals and justice. He brought four
fold charge against Paul:
1. "a pestilent fellow" ". 81. This
would indicate a fellow utterly base
and corrupt-a plague.
2. An meter of rebellion, mover Of
sedition ". 81. This they hoped
would bring him into conflict with the
Roman power.
3. That he was the ringleader of a
sect-a schismatical party-a hereto
". 81.
4. That he had profaned the temple
". g..
III. Pau's Defense wv. 1920.
In this defense note:
1. Paul's frankness and courtesy ".
10Y. Flattery is entirely wanting. He
gives recognition of the fact that Felix
had been ruler of this people long
enough to be able to judge justly, as
the habits and ways of the Jews were
familiar to him; and then, in a digni-
fed manner, assumes that Felix will
render just decision based upon the
facts of the case.
2. The charge Of sedition denied wv.
II, 12). He fatty and scornfully de-
MED this charge, showing it's utter
falsity, since the time was too short,
being but twelve days since he went to
Jerusalem, and half of that time had
been spent as prisoner Of the Ro-
mans. His conduct while there dis
proved it-he disputed with no man in
the temple; neither did he make any
attempt to incite the people in the city
nor in the synagogue.
3. The charge of heresy wv. 14-16).
This charge he met by concession
and denial. He admitted that he was
OF the Way" which they called heresy,
but clearly showed that it was in
keeping with the Hebrew religion: az
he worshiped the same God ". 14);
(2) he fully believed in the same
Scriptures ". 14); (3) he had the same
hope of coming resurrection of the
dead ". 15). He declared that he
made as the principle of life con-
science void Of offense before God and
man.
4. The charge of sacrilege, or profa-
nation of the temple wv. 17-21). This
charge he refuted by showing (1) that
he had come all the way from Greece
". 10 to worship at the feast; (2)
that he had not come up empty-hand-
ed, but had brought aims for his ma
ton ". 10; (3) that there were not
competent witnesses present to testify
as to his behavior in the temple ".
49,; by challenging his enemies to
testify as to his conduct in the council
". 20).
I'LL. Paul Before Felix the Second
Time (vv 22-27).
This is a sort of a sequel to the
trial. Wicked as Felix was, Paups
manner somewhat won his favor,
though he did not release him. His
sentence was indulgent Imprisonment,
which kept him free from his enemies
While under Roman protection. Felix
sent for Paul that he might hear of
Christ from him. Paul behaved him
self Alright before these sinners in high
life. He reasoned Of righteousness,
self-control and judgment to come, be-
fore Felix and his sinful wife, with
such power that Felix was terrified
and declared that he would hear Paul
further at q convenient time. This was
a most flimsy excuse for not changing
his life and granting justice to Paul.
He was so in bondage to sin that he
was unwilling to change. Also he
hoped that by delaying matters he
would receive a b1.ibe