Wausau pilot. [volume] (Wausau, Wis.) 1896-1940, 1921-02-03
federal BOARD
HOLDS UP PLEA
Chairman Barton Refuses to
] Abolish National Rail Wage
Agreements.
LINES ASK BIG REDUCTION
Managers Are Told to Agree With the
Men on Plan to Cut Wages Az.
ter Ninety Days-National
Control Advocated.

Chicago, Feb. Refusal to abolish
the national agreements and to re-
uuce the wages of railroad employees
by the United States labor board was
forecast when Chairman II. NJ. Barton
declined to receive a request to that
effect, made by w. w. Atterbury for
the Railroad Executives association.
The plan of the railroads was to
reduce wages of common labor at
once and cut wages of other employees
after 90 days.
Chairman Barton asked Mr.. After
bury If it were not possible for the
railroad executives and the employees
20 get together in spirit of helpful
ness and not in antagonism and work
put basis for the board to act upon.
Mr.. Atterbury declared that the sit
patton Is so acute and there Is such
p radical difference of opinion be-
tween the two sides that such con-
Ference would not bring any relief.
Basis Of Wage Relief
Chairman Barton said that when the
BOARD made its wage award the ma
fional agreements were the basis upon
which the award was made.
He again declared that the two par
Fies should first get together and work
Earnestly for mutual solution. Final
~ he declined to receive the request
of the railroads and said that for
NAL decision whether or not to receive
bt would be made after an executive
session of the board.
! Mr.. Atterbury was given a hearing
at the opening of the days session of
the board, and he made formal plea
that the present hearing on working
conditions be discontinued, that the
national agreements be abolished at
once, and that basis be given for
an ultimate reduction In wages.
Henry Hunt, representing the pub
Tic on the railway labor board, de-
clared when Mr.. Atterbury finished:
The transportation act requires a
conference should be held on any sub
5ect likely to interrupt service. L
think you should take up in confer
ence with the employees the condi-
lions you have presented here" he
said.
A. o. Wharton, labor member of the
labor board, demanded that Mr.. After
bury put on record the names of the
railroads that were behind him and
state upon what authority he acted in
asking for the annulment of the ma
tional agreements.
Opposes Wage Reductions.
Violent opposition to wage reduc-
lions on the part of railroad workers
who are expected to take firm stand
against giving up any privileges gained
during federal control, was voiced by
j. c. Luhrsen, president of the Amer
lean Train Dlspatchers' association.
He advocates national control of all
railroads In statement issued after
Mr.. Atterburys presentation.
"A single ownership in some form
and unified operation of all United
States carriers" he declared. sis the
only logical outcome of the transpor-
tation problems of America.
Inc employees OF the railroads OF
America will not submit to bearing the
burden which the carriers seek to i'm.
pose on them
THE great effort now being made
TO reduce operating expenses is all d.
rected against the workers. The whole
American railway system Is extrava.
gantly operated and the public Is
asked TO pay the bill"
b. NJ. Jewell. president of the rail.
road employees department of the
American Federation of Labor. sent
telegram to President Wilson. charg-
Ing that General Atterbury had not
only violated all decent proprlety by
his ultimatum 10 the labor board, but
had disregarded the transportation
laws and hou, existing agencies.
such as the interstate commerce COM
mission. which have been created ex.
pressly by congress 10 deal with the
financial requirements and proper OBJ
Grafton of the railroads.
He called upon the President To have
the railroad executives place their ey-
idence OF inability to operate the rail.
roads before the interstate commerce
commission. II IL Is found 10 be true.
he asked the President to refer the
matter 10 congress.