The Washington herald., 1921-05-06
COURT OF APPEALS.

Present-Chief Justice Smyth. and
Justices Robb & Van orsdel.
3479 Kellogg VS. winchell. Rule to
show cause.
3623 Clark VS. Shirley. Judgt re-
versed with costs & mandate or
dered to issue herewith.
35l6 Brennon VS. Rust. Judgt re-
versed with costs & mandate or
dered to issue herewith
3517, 351S, 3519 Brennon VS. Rust
Judgt reversed G. mandate ordered
to issue herewith in each cause.
$500 Barton vs. Rust.
1891 Mortimer VS. Rust.
S522 Mortimer VS. Rust.
3546 Heavey VS. Rust. Judgt in
each case reversed & mandate or
dered to issue herewith.
1884 o'Shaughnessy VS. Wash Loan
& Trust
35s5 wenlert VS. Wash Loan &
Trust Co.
1886 Warner vvs Wash LoaE &
Trust Co. Judgt reversed in each
case & mandate ordered to issue
herewith.
Assignment for May ..
Patent Appeals
1889, 1893, 1916 & 1894. 1896, 1917.
and 1923.
DISTRICT SUPREME COURT.
EUITY DIVISION No. 1.
Proceedings.
3S333 Natl Academy of Sciences
VS. Meyer. Decree estblg title. Raj
ston & Willis, attys for pltf.
3s334 Natl Academy of Sciences
VS. Macomb. Decree estblg title.
Ralston & Willis, attys.
3S662 Fredericks VS. Herself. Ref
to Albert Harper, exmnr. Linton &
James, attys for pltf.
340S3 Bissell VS. Faltinger. Leave
grtd to amend bill. H. Murray
w. r. Ballard, attys. -
3sS47 White VS. Heiskell. Ref to
NJ. NJ. Murray. examnr. Linton &
James, attys for pltf.
3SS6S Andino VS. Marcello. Sale
ratified &c ref to auditor. Lloyd &
Keeley-F. E. Mitchell, attys.
65s6 Lunacy. In re Frederick T.
Wilson. Order to file new undtkg.
F. A Tanning, atty.
EQUITY DIVISION No. L.
1881 Lun in re Benjamin F. Sum-
merlin. Reference to the auditor. F.
A. Fenning. atty.
3s577 Brown VS. Forrest. Decree
establishing title. Ralston & wiIlcs,
pltf attys.
Motions for Equity Division No. One
for Today.
Cannon VS. Cannon. Darr, White
ford and Darr--Downing, attys.
2 Ohio Butterine Co. VS. Wilson &
Co. Fenwick-Allen, attys.
Carl vs Carl. Evans-Yeasman,
attys.
Marshall VS. Marshall. BealI-
Turnage-Hawkins and Havell,
attys.
so o'Reilly vvs American Tele-
graphone Co. Sullivan-Johnson-
Gatley-Shinn, attys.
6 Hardy VS. Hardy. RRegan, atty.
z Diggs VS. Diggs. Peyton, atty.
s Friedman VS. Marine. Gusack.-
Newmyer, attys.
. Lesage VS. Lesage. wolf-New-
myer, attys.
10 Foley VS. Plotnick. Price, atty.
IL Barghausen VS. Barghausen.
Observation-Disclosures atty. +
IL Broks vs. Brooks. Richardson
Emerson, stYs.
13 Smith VS. Kanawha National
Bank. Barger-Linten, attys.
IA Decker VS. Simmons. whalen.
pltf atty.
EQUITY DIVISION No. 2.
Proceedings.
Bkcy 361 In re Thos. E. wagga-
man. Order authorizing trustee to
make sale & vacating order of July
16, 1912. p. Galley, atty.
3S72Q Baker VS. Baker. Order for
alimony pending divorce. coombe q
Geo. McNeil-A. d. Smith, attys.
400 Adoption in re Donald b.
Massey. Rule returnable May 10.
John Raum, atty.
Equity Division No. 2Motions for
Today. l.
1 Hartman VS. Masters. Gardiner
Lambert. Davis, Horton. attys.
Estate Of Louis Gundling. Hill
en- &Smith--Burkart, attys.
Thompson VS. Thompson. De-
Lacy-Jackson. attys.
4 Thompson vs. Thompson. Wolf
Tanner, attys. t
5 Biting VS. Biting. Leckie, Cox
& Sherier. attys.
Gentry VS. Gentry. Scott
Burnley attys.
Z Sullivan VS. sullivan. Beiicr.
Gordon--Coombe. attys.
5 Southern Realty Corporation vs.
Munsey Trust Co. Archer 4 smith