New Ulm Post. [volume] (New-Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1864-1933, 1921-09-30
County Commissioners
Special Session.

OpeCldl OcSSlOlI.
Due notice having been given to all
members of the County Board of
Brown County, Minnesota, for a
special meeting to be held at the
County Commissioners Chambers, in
the Court House in the City Of New
Ulm, Minnesota, on September 22nd,
1921, at two o'clock P. M, for the pur-
pose of considering the engineers re-
tport In the matter of repair work to
be doneaon Branches a and 81, of
Judicial Ditch No: 5, Watonwan and
Brown counties.
All members, present.
In the matter of the repair work on
Branch No. a, of Judicial Ditch No. 5,
Watonwan and Brown Counties, the
following resolution was offered and
accepted:
i, WHEREAS, the engineer appointed
by this Board on the 9th day of August,
1921, in the matter of the repair pc
titioned for on Branch No. 4 of Judicial
Ditch No. 5, Watonwan and Brown
Counties, has made an filed his report
thereon the LIST day of September 1921,
and a hearing thereon was duly had
the 22nd day of September, 1921,
pursuant to due notice; and
~
WHEREAS, at said hearing all
parties interested in said matter ap-
peared and were heard, and the said
engineer attended upon said hearing,
and the County Board having fully
and fairly, considered all matters pre-
scented at said hearing and no objection
of any kind Of nature whatever to the
said repairs. being carried into execu-
tioana being presented; now therefore
L, is Ordered, By the County Board,
that the said repairs SO 'petitioned for
and set forth and'executed as in said
engineers report specified; and
ORDERED FURTHER, that the
said repairs so specified in said en-
gineer's report be made and completed
without unnecessary delay; under the
supervision and direction Of the said en-
gineer and that the said engineer make
due report thereon. to this Board upon
the completion of the said work.
In the matter of the repair work on
Branch No. 81, of judicial Ditch No,
s, Watonwan and Brown Counties, the
following resolution was offered and
accepted;
WHEREAS, the engineer appointed
by this Board on the 9th day of August
in the matter of the repair petitioned
fol. on Branch No. 81 of Judicial Ditch
No: 5, Waton,w;an and Brown Counties
has made and filed his report Thereon
the LIST day Of September, 1921, and
hearing thereon was duly had the 22nc
day of September, 1921 92%l, :purs}qiaant +. t.
due notice; and }c4uz, ..a,a,
WHEREAS; at, said hearing al,
parties interested in said matter ap'
peared and were heard, and the said
engineer attended upon said hearing,
and the County Board having fully
and fairly. considered all matters pre-
sented at said hearing,and no. objection
of any kind Observation-Disclosures TO the
said repairs being carried into execution
being presented; and.therefore,6 55do
IT IS ORDERED, blythe County
Board, that the said repairs so pc
titioned for and set forth in the report
of the said engineer be-, and the same
are hereby, directed to be made and
executed as in said engineers report
specified; and
ORDERED FURTHER, that the
said repairs so specified in said engi-
neer's report be made and completed
without unnecessary delay; under the
supervision and direction of the said
engineer and that the said engineer
make due report thereon to. this Board
upon the completion Of the said work.
The request Of the Industrial Com
mission iea, Of ST; Minnesota ipp asking for per
mission t. use the Court i room 24 on
September p 9Sm9tb 51:tj 8 B b.: at + z o'clock F ~ NJ a.
was granted. 6 nsdls94-9 .,3*.u.
Tie re request Of Fred Prahl, Deputy
Estate Boiler oE INSPECTOR, asking for per e !:
mission for the ahl4, use of available space
in the 'co luIf House. to 2 conduct exami-
nations on September 30th, was upon
motion duly granted.
The committee appointed on October
16, 1919, to work in conjunction with
the supervisors of the town of Sigel for
the rebuilding of a concrete bridge
across the Little Cottonwood river on
the public highway between sections
20 and 29, at the Henry Waibel farm,
reported in writing that this bridge
has been completed according to plans
and specifications at a cost of $264.25,
and they therefore recommend that
the town of Sigel be reimbursed in the
amount of $132.12, out of the County
Road and Bridge Fund, being one-half