Norwich bulletin., 1921-05-28

Crocker Hotel Corp. Eon-suit for fail- | ure to file bill of particulars, ordered in ! one week. Henry H. Rice vs. Rosana 1 Rice. Default for failure to answer | pleadings in Ntwo weeks. Mary Jane Huling vs. Harry H. Huling. Default for failure to answer, postponed. Barnes vs. Mystic Valley Creamery Go. Hearing on application for allowance of claim of Frederick A. Barnes. Pugh vs. Hayden, Hearing on application for jury trial of
 issues of fact. Daisy Lucinda Stiehl vs. William Stiehl, Jr. Second order of no-
 tice granted. Irene B. Hammond Brain ard vs. Clarence N. Bratnard, Answer
 or uncontested, off. Rose L. Mansfield vs.
 Frank X. Mansfield 1 Alimony pen
 lente lite. postponed. Answer or un-
 contested list, answer in two weeks or on
 uncontested list. Armstrong, ct al. vs
 Liverone Argument of demurrer, off. An
 derson vs. Chapel, ct al. Non-suit for
 failure to plead. opened, reply to. be
 filed May 27th. Byrne vs. Abernathy.
 Default for failure to plead, pleadings
 in two weeks Masons Island Co vs. En-
 ders, ct al. 1 Default against defend
 ants Thomas B. Enders, Elizabeth Col
 grove and John B. Colgrove for failure
 to plead, in one week. ? Termination of
 continuance as to defendants Cora E.
 Colgrove, Edward ". Colgrove, James C.
 '
 E. Colgrove, granted. 3 Second order of
 notice as to defendant Ellen A. Brownell,
 granted. Shay vs. Mantle Menhaden Oil x Guano Go. Application. of W. S. Cahill for permission to file action, granted in 3 days Lubchansky vs. United States Electric Co.,, Default for failure to plead, pleadings in two weeks. Graham, ct al. vs. Jansson, ct al. Hearing on appli-
 cation for temporary injunction. postpon- T of committee may be approved and con- hrmed, approved. ? That allowance may be made for services and expenses of committee, costs and fee of clerk, final l judgment.ff. Mariners Savings Bank vs. Saf1er, ct al. Foreclosure and limita ton of time, judgment as per stipulation. Di Francesca, ct al. vs. Amantia Admr., ct al. Judgment confirming temporary as permanent receiver and limiting time for presentation of claims, judgment. Groton | Iron Works vs. City of New London Motion to amend writ and file bond granted, bond of $75. Webb vs. John son. That default be opened and case
 reinstated on docket, judge took the pa pers. Webb vs. Johnson. That default be opened and case reinstated on docket, | judge took the papers. Ann Cathcart
 Kluess vs.. Otto Kluess. Second order of 1 notice, granted. Barnard. EXT, etc. vs. 1 Smith, ct al. Appeal from Probate. That Bertha J. Barnard and Joseph T. Crut- i teuden, Admr.. with the will annexed be made parties in said action, granted. | Ralph I. Main vs. Sadie Nj. Main. That l the plaintiff be non-suited for failure to l comply with the order of court postpon- l ed. Mary Danko vs. John Danko. That 1 the defendant be defaulted for failure to j, comply with the order of court, postpon- | ed for two weeks. Avery vs. Linnell, l Judgment by default for failure to plead, 1 pleadings in two weeks. Selkowitx vs, 1 Gilman. Judgment by default for failure 1 to plead, pleadings in two weeks. Bates vs. Carroll. Answer or default. Bates l vs CN-roll. Answer or default. Halybur- ton vs, Carroll. Answer or default. Haly- l burton, vs. Carroll, Answer or default l all pleadings in one week. Woodworth vs { W. A. Smith & Co.,. Inc. 1 Order con-
 frming temporary receiver as permanent
 receiver, judgment. ? Order accepting the | inventory filed by temporary receiver as
 the inventory of the receiver, accepted
 City of Norwich Ss- Murphy, ct al. An
 swer in one week, pleadings in two
 weeks Mary Santacroce vs. James San
 tacroce. Judgment for defendant, post
 poned. Bohun vs. Pachkoski, ct al. An
 swer or default, pleadings in two weeks
 Lee individually and as Trustee vs. Lee
 Exr, ct al., Appeal from Probate.
 That motion for more particular state ment be filed, off. Argument of mo ton for more particular statement. of
 3 Motion that these two cases growing , out of the same subject matter be refer red. after hearing on this motion to
 committee to hear the evidence and re