Every evening, Wilmington daily commercial., 1921-11-05
kOllOWSK| REMAINS
IN THE CUSTODY OF
POLICE CHIEF BLACK
kAis Petition Tor a Writ Of hab-
sas Corpus oismisssd by
Judge Il. L. Rice.
Nc MUST PAY ARREARAGES

nsfAf tAiuit. Yesterday afternoon. dis.
fNassAri Victor hnsiovNklH petition for
Nflt ~ hsNeAs entpua and rtmanded
hln la lhe ruslnd, ~ superintendent
ei i'nllff uenFaf rlaeh. i>osloWHkl has
Seen nfl#unrr singe October ~,
NNth neputi ilriss john ~ iNnn Of
iht Municipal vout, directed that he
Ne heli until efteafAgea w nom
eurpufl eldlf previously mede by
eali enNfl nfe paid. iudse Rice de-.
N'tffs the folluNlnn upinionl
have nlAen this case such con.
sliffailaA a4 puaslhle duflNg thv lims
llNi lmt NHiNeen iha afnumsnt and
ihe present llmp
NiauNa ia1 ihn petitioner pred.
lfaita ht aINNmsHl Nlnnal whNilA
Nnah ihN nNtAaa fact that tho petl.
iisHNf Nts committed va lho derutN
iHiNe ui ihe Municipal Count in
taNirMW NimaftAlnat thla contention
w nHl hAprHIted N the return nled
nl M iht fftslda h.luly thp court Ia
ihe paaf n aipeafa tfom the return
W ufaiAt nlafkt lhf superintendent
HI lniltf. lhAt NJ. pell,lonuf a held
NNlsNaHi in NN aldIl ~ ihr dspul,
ilial W iNN Municipal tnuft dlreots
iNN ihal lNr defendant hp held unil
HffNlfttts iN 4 nHN sHuppnli ofirf pffs
t'NAa't W4if hA lhp count il paid
fhr Ntud shows that un Nafsh
1921 lhp deputy lmlac ai lhe Nunls
tHl tNnfi nnde temporary orier
NiHfiAlHR ihhi ihH petitioner hHre. who
Nt lhN NefNnisNi ln iho pfoeee,ime
tNNH hfiHIn ihn Nnufl. should paN the
FNm W so Nvf week. inf thv support
HHi nhlNltHHA|r ul hls wife and fouf
nNnHl children That un the itth daY
tf MAftN tne count after hearing
tht evidence NIHlNlfd nn behalf 90 thp
state And lhU defendant. adiuArsd tho
slsfehdsW Nni'iF az failure to support
Die wife aHd iNul minor uhnaron and
uldsfei. Without .mnua.ne me penalty
Nt AN provided. that thc defendant
should pas ie thf prfiatlnn uniOtf the
enm ul so pea week Tor the support
Hni nminieHaHgs 81 defendants wife
ani chlidfeH sli also appear norsosl.
iN ih court Whenever ordered ta o. -
sNi ~ comply Win ihr terms ~ the
vfaef Ol support of ~ any subsequent
fiealhrAilen lhefeof and also that the
PENDANT N released ffam CUSTODY
"h pfnhlilHn Wpnn entering into q
tfHeealsan Without surety n the
fHln ~ fApN fHr tnmpl4re with the
ufdff uf The court nWdo on said ibth
WV w NAENItf AHaNf
fhe fefurd further shows that the
fefarnlseuee was entered lnto hy the
defendant that subsequently. on tho
ftih daN ef svtohcr 1871 subpoena
was issurd and served on the defend.
anl fnf him O. appear 81 court and
show cause WAY the order of thc court
had not been complied WITH return
aflt "a pefcf~f -. and on October ea.
ite defendant being present. and after
hrsfinn tho evidence produced on be.
half - ihe state and tho dtfendant.
ne deputy iudee ~ the Municipal
Court eraffe1 tte defendant 70 ho
committed uui1 tne afreafaees we're
raid and io Nifa bond n ho sum of
500 with surety Coz compliance with
lhe fnimef felef.
fhe order 20 iha court and ne
tf0nau.aHtf entered into was ln com.
nlianef u#h Section tttt. Revised
tsde itlt in which q ia stated
Before To- uial, with the conson0
ei ne defendant 81 AZ the trial. ou
filfN Hi plea ol guilty. of after CON.
t|etlnH. instead al Imposing ihe pfn.
hie hsHhrieft provided of in al.
tiinn thereto. tft cpHfi n lts dis.
rfei.nh having fek1fd o. tho eleum.
"anfee and a. iae nnaneai ability 8.
earning caps 'if of thf defendant
tHai have t1f bower in inshe au order
Wai0h shall "a sHhieel ia ehanae ht
fHs tuHft ifam time e. line. a. cif
IHmNlAnees may Require. difttfIns thl
DEFENDANT lo N8N etfIaln suu
Ntf'elieaiiy ie the wife of fhe guard
aH. 81 custodian 0f int ald minn
tHNa Oh UHillffH nI ia an Organization
Nf lndi oval approved hN ihp enuf
a. trustee. ard tp rUltase the defend
aHi ffNm ensiadf cn probation, upe'
iiA nf he's ttifflHA 1870 q rflaHnlaanci
Nlfh 0f without HNfefN ln suUh suH
aH ihe court ef = judge thereof !
vacation HlaN otstf anu approve III
NndIfieH HI tHt fftHnrimHra shall b
sHfh thai q ins defendant shall nat
AA af hH personal appearance &
uNfl whichever eIdrftd o. da -. au
NhsN further COMPLY vlih lht ieuu
W sHth ui4tf af support ~ al an
subsequent modification ttteni fNe
aHHh ffOUHHFau.f shall 81 Void. other
NsH iH ful lnff aNd effect
section s0tn iisflsra Code ltla. &
neft provides
if ihs eaafl hf satisfied he H
formation end dHe ufuaf under oat
ltni ihU arifnuHHi has violated IA
isfmt 81 sHrh afatf Il uiaf fofihwlt
ffuleed Nilh lhf trial 81 thf defeadat
nnasf ihs NfiHlnai lenNleflun. pr 81
\ fnfeN ths suspended sentence aH GA
amAs mas ia -
rfom ths record h apnsafa tht
ihf defendant ha atinH failed lo comp.
Nlih she order q ihs rpuli and %
fffms ~ thH fNeuRnlnnfe, WaH sau
H.Aned before ihf Yuufi 90 the aal
aas ~ tstisl.ef "A n ihtl and give
nH opportunity fn show Why tl
utsef ~ tAr raufi hha n0i heen gou
nnd vilh q ALSO appears from ~
leNusd that nffpr hearing iNt etldfnf
lha e4uit ntdtfed him i0 De he
nhsfi thp hffrafappt we're Nnid and
hsna wllh saHleitnl surety was -
tassa iniu hk iht defendant
sfhs deputy ludnt ~ ths MuuieH9
COURT. even after thp defendant na
tausa 81 somply with ths order pipi
tusk made. evidently wac fvluetti
"a sfnpuss a term ~ inpf sunmeni ul
u.s the provisions ~ the statute witl
,.us nsws ulslnn thr attendant nn oI
tastuusss a. phy iht arrears nnd q
asesa hsn. held until ths nffealna
us.s paid lf probably appfaflnp tiu
bs ussaellNs thai ihf defendant vi
Wusullp saillns a. suuplY with q
snsns ~ tns ufavf hnu the terms
th. t.soxflwantf. 4 htln4 ihp polls
"a that court. ~ ~ all uthet souf
Na esnx jurisdiction in such mntiei
iu slsn deilnuutui husband ~
tathss every ftanpuphlf uiNuifuni