The Washington herald., 1921-05-06
COURT OF APPEALS.

Present-Chief Justice Smyth. and
Justices Robb & Van Orsdel.
3479 Kellogg VS. Winchell. Rule to
show cause.
3623 Clark VS. Shirley. Judgt re-
versed with costs & mandate or
dered to issue herewith.
1915 Brennon VS. Rust. Judgt re-
versed with costs & mandate or
dered to issue herewith
3517, 351S, 3519 Brennon VS. Rust.
Judgt reversed G. mandate ordered
to issue herewith in each cause.
$500 Barton VS. Rust.
1891 Mortimer VS. Rust.
5522 Mortimer VS. Rust.
3546 Heavey VS. Rust. Judgt in
each case reversed & mandate or
dered to issue herewith.
1884 o'Shaughnessy VS. Wash Loan
& Trust.
s5s5 wenlert VS. Wash Loan &
Trust Co.
1886 Warner vvs Wash LoaE &
Trust Co. Judgt reversed in each
case & mandate ordered to issue
herewith.
Assignment for May ..
Patent Appeals.
1889, 1898, 1916 & 1894. 1896, 1917,
and 1923.
DISTRICT SUPREME COURT.
EUITY DIVISION No. 1.
Proceedings.
3S333 Natl Academy of Sciences
VS. Meyer. Decree estblg title. Raj
ston & Willis, attys for pltf.
3S334 Natl Academy of Sciences
VS. Macomb. Decree estblg title.
Ralston & Willis, attys.
3S662 Fredericks VS. Herself. Ref
to Albert Harper, exmnr. Linton &
James, attys for pltf.
340S3 Bissell VS. Faltinger. Leave
grtd to amend bill. H. Murray
W. r Ballard, attys. -
3S647 White VS. Heiskell. Ref to
NJ. NJ. Murray. examnr. Linton &
James, attys for pltf.
SSS6S Andino VS. Marcello. Sale
ratified &c ref to auditor. Lloyd &
Keeley-F. E. Mitchell, attys.
65s6 Lunacy. In re Frederick T.
Wilson. Order to file new undtkg.
F. A. Tanning, atty.
EQUITY DIVISION No. 1.
1881 Lun in re Benjamin F.. Sum-
merlin. Reference to the auditor. F.
A. Fenning. atty.
3s577 Brown VS. Forrest. Decree
establishing title. Ralston & willcs,
pltf attys.
Motions for Equity Division No. One
for Today.
Cannon VS. Cannon. Darr, White
ford and Darr-Downing, attys.
Ohio Butterine Co. VS. Wilson &
Co. Fenwick-Allen. attys.
Carl vs. Carl. Evans-Yeasman,
attys.
Marshall VS. Marshall. BealI-
Turnage-Hawkins and HavelI,
attys.
SO o'Reilly vvs American Tele-
graphone Co. Sullivan-Jo johnson
Gatley-Shinn. attys.
Hardy vs. Hardy. RRegan, atty,
Z Diggs VS. Diggs. Peyton, atty.
Friedman VS. Marine. Gusack.-
Newmyer, attys.
Q LeSage VS. LeSage. wolf-Ncw-
myer, attys.
10 Foley VS. Plotnick. Price, atty,
IL Barghausen VS. Barghause1.
Observation-Disclosures, atty, ;
IL Broks VS. Brooks. Richardson
Emerson, atYs.
13 Smith VS. Kanawha National
Bank. Barger-Linten, attys.
IA Decker VS. Simmons. whaIcn,
pltf atty.
EQUITY DIVISION No. 2.
Proceedings.
Bkcy 361 In re Thos. E. wagga-
man. Order authorizing trustee to
make sale & vacating order of July
16, 1912. p. Galley, atty.
3s72o Baker VS. Baker. Order for
alimony pending divorce. coombe q
Geo. McNeil-A. d. Smith, attys.
403 Adoption in re Donald B.
Massey. Rule returnable May 10.
John Raum, atty.
Equity Division No. @Motion. for
Today. S
Hartman VS. Masters. Gardiner
Lambert. Davis, Horton, attys
Estate of Louis Gundling. Hill
en- &smith-Burkart. attys.
Thompson VS. Thompson. De-
Lacy-Jackson. attys.
4 Thompson VS. Thompson. Wolf
Tanner, attys.
5 Biting VS. Biting. Leckie, Cox
q Sherier. attys.
Gentry VS. Gentry. Scott
Biumley. attys. 30
Sullivan VS. sullivan. Belicr.
Gordon-Coombe. G attys.
Southern Realty Corporation vs.
Munsey Trust Co. Archer a Smith
Ixmbert nffxn- !, - !. 2