New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1921-09-28
County Commissioners
Special Session.


Brown County, Minnesota, for a
special meeting to be held at the
County Commissioners Chambers, in
the Court House in the City of New
Ulm, Minnesota, on September 22nd,
1921, at two o'clock P. NJ, for the pur-
pose of considering the engineers re-
port in the matter of repair work to
be done on Branches 4 and 81, of
Judicial Ditch No. 5, Watonwan and
Brown counties.
All members present.
In the matter of the repair work on
Branch No. A, Of Judicial Ditch No. 5,
Watonwan and Brown Counties, the
following resolution was offered and
accepted:
WHEREAS, the engineer appointed
by this Board on the 9th day of August,
1921, in the matter of the repair pc
titioned for on Branch, No. of Judicial
Ditch No. 5, Watonwan and Brown
Counties, has made an filed his report
thereon the 1st day of September 1921,
and a hearing thereon was duly had
the 22nd day of September, 1921,
pursuant to due notice; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing all
parties interested in said matter ap-
peared and we're heard, and the said
engineer attended upon said hearing,
and the County Board having fully
and fairly considered all matters pre-
sented at said hearing and no objection
of any kind or nature whatever to the
said repairs being carried into execu-
ton being presented; now therefore
1t is Ordered, by the County Board,
that the said repairs so petitioned for
and set forth and executed as in said
report specified; and
ORDERED FURTHER, that the
said repairs so specified in said en-
gineer's report be made and completed
without unnecessary delay; under the
and direction of the said en-
gineer and that the said engineer make
due report thereon to this Board upon
the completion of the said work.
In the matter of the repair work on
Branch No. 81, of Judicial Ditch No.
S, Watonwan and Brown Counties, the
following resolution was offered and
accepted;
WHEREAS, the engineer appointed
by this Board on the 9th day of August,
in the matter of the repair petitioned
for on Branch No. 81 of Judicial Ditch
No. S, Watonwan and Brown Counties,
has made and filed his report thereon
the LIST day of Septemb Der, 1921, and a
hearing thereon was duly had the 22nd
day of September, 1921, pursuant to
due notice; and
WHEREAS,> at said hearing all
parties interested in said matter ap-
peared and were heard, and the said
engineer attended upon said hearing,
and the County Board having fully
and fairly considered all matters pre-
sented at said hearing and no objection
of any kind or nature whatever to the
said repairs being carried into execution
being presented; and therefore,
1T IS ORDERED, by the County
Board, that the said repairs so pc
titioned for and set forth in the report
of the said engineer be, and the same
are hereby, directed to be made and
executed as in said engineers report
specified; and
ORDERED FURTHER, that the
said repairs so specified in said engi-
neer's report be made and completed
without unnecessary delay; under the
supervision and direction of the said
engineer and that the said engineer
make due report thereon to this Board
upon the completion of the said work
The request of the Industrial Com
mission of Minnesota asking for per-
mission to use the Court room on
September goth, at 2 o'clock P. NJ,
was granted.
The request of Fred Prahl, Deputy
State Boiler Inspector, asking for per-
mission for the use of available space
in the Court House to conduct exami-
nations on September 30th, was upon
motion duly granted.
The committee appointed on October
16, 1919, to work in conjunction with
the supervisors of the town of Sigel fol-
the rebuilding of concrete bridge
across the Little Cottonwood river on
the public highway between sections
% and 20, at the Henry Waibel farm
reported in writing that this bridge
has been completed according to plans
and specifications at a cost of $264.25
and they therefore recommend that
the town of Sigel be re-im bursed in the
amount of $132.12, out of the County
Road and Bridge Fund, being one-halt
OF the cost of construction of said
bridge and in accordance to the appro-
priation asked for by said town.