Capital journal. (Salem, Or.) 1919-1980, 1921-11-21
PoIkCountyCollrt
Circuit Court.

William Macdonald VS.. d. f.
Miller. The defendant, by his at
torneys, A. o. Condit and Ronald
G. Glover, filed answer to the
plaintiffs complaint and, for Dis
first and separate answer alleges
that plaintiff and defendant en-.
tered into a verbal agreement
wherein defendant was to rent
plaintiffs farm, Plaintiff was to
furnish all seed, stock, and imple-
ments, each was to receive one
half of the crop. Defendant fur
ther alleges that plaintiff request
ed defendant to grind grain and
feed it to the stock belonging to
the palintiff, for which the de-
fendant paid; and, further, de-
fendant constructed fences on
plaintiffs farm wherein the rea-
sonable value Of the labor amount
ed to some 500. Defendant sets
up further counter claims against
the plaintiff and prays the court
for an judgment against the PLAIN
tiff in the sum of SS40.59 as his
costs and disbursements.
d. M. Fields and F. M. Housh
VS.. w. G. Lee. Plaintiffs, through
their attorneys, McNary, McNary
G. Keyes G. e. NJ. Page, filed their
complaint wherein, after setting
up the status of the partnership
OF which plaintiffs and defendant
are members, pray the court that a
receiver be appointed with author
ity to take immediate possession;
that said receiver have power to
sell and dispose of the entire prop
erty and use the proceeds to can
Gel claims now outstanding
against said partnership; that the
partnership be dissolved ana that
the proceeds, after indebtedness
Is covered, be distributed to the
plaintiff and defendant as they
are Interested in said partnership
The plaintiffs further pray that
they be granted Judgment for their
costs and disbursements
L. L. Loree VS.. FL G. Brown ct
al. The plaintiff, by his attorney,
Otto w. Heider, filed complaint in
the above entitled case wherein
he alleges that he agreed to work
for defendants, II, G. Brown and
zosel at the agreed price Of SIS
per day in cutting sawlogs on
property belonging to II. C. Brown,
John Wick and p. B. Hamilton;
that plaintiff duly filed his log
gers lien and that the proper time
has elapsed since such filing.
Plaintiff prays for judgment
against defendants in the sum of
5000, with interest at 6 per cent,
together with $50 attorneys fees,
and that his Judgment be decreed
to be prior claim on the logs COW
cred IN his logger's lien. He fur
ther prays that he be granted
Judgment against defendants.
Brown and Aosel, for any deficit
ency that may occur after the pro-
ceeds OF the sawlogs has been ap-
piled 70 his said claim.
otiilie Clarke VS.. Edwin Clarke.
Summons returned by the sheriff,
John W. Orr, showing the defend
ant is not obtainable within said
county or state.
oAillornla raiking corporation
~ oharies =. cooper ana Anna l..
cooper summons returned by
lne snerili showing service made
~ eauh o. 'he ueIendants.
nasiu ~ Nluueil, James Rid
asl' anu Suwin y hiaoeli VS.. Gas
Ion aiiier 81 uA ana the un-
AnoMn he,rs =. W - hramer, de-
.e"seu, .''s isooi ,, o, pupiication OF
'uln'aVns '' Sa' ilieu' Deiauit ana de-
49, .,.s..,., ~ .ue Souil stating
.ae.s,n ~, =, snas ene p'aiht',is nave
,sen : - poss.ssion ' OF rear proper
: -. sioAs1 ~ nloie .han TWEEN
: [ dso,aa N s',ns ~ ss.u pia'ntilis
,,.n, o,,.'s '" 'ne eout,' making
WI 6 Hta,, - 'e sinApre'
!, r,.a nso,.,,. .~ss =. -, :. louunuht-
ra,. sna.,on ~ y" " suue hen. from
shcwina ~ - sesSe ses.e p..0.uo. NO,
,,dgmcnt sor az a, a. .a.s a. .eue,sea
- au Oou'"
1ioua.e OouIt'
~ sne ihaeeer Oh tne estate cf
oan =, Aoran. deceased Letters