Idaho County free press. [volume] (Grangeville, Idaho Territory) 1886-current, 1921-09-22
rs CASES ON.
AS.
COURT OPENS


Up, Three Involving AL
legged Traffic in Booze
/ Nine Unhappy Wives Seek De-
crees of Divorce, While One
Husband Asks Separation
Fall term of district court for Ida
no county will convene Monday morn
ing at 10 in the courthouse in Grange
/ vile, Judge Wallace N. Scales presid-
hing Five criminal case are on the cal
endar. Of these three are cases involv-
! inc alleged violation of the prohibit
/ ton laws, one is case where it is
! claimed oil stock was sold unlawfully,
! and the fifth is a continuation of a
burglary charge from preceding terms
! Of court.
Seventy-four civil cases appear on
/ the calendar. Many of these are suits
| on notes, suits on accounts and fore
/ closure of mortgages. Ten divorce cases
1 are listed. Nine unhappy wives in
/ Idaho county seek legal separations
from their husbands, while one man
asks decree Of divorce from his
fwife.
CRIMINAL CASES
Here is the criminal calendar:
State VS.. Dugald Holselaw, burglary,
ION bail
/ State VS.. Thomas Lindsey, manufac
Turing liquor, ETC., on bail.
State VS.. F. ID. Page, manufactur
[ing liquor, ETC., on bail.
State VS.. Alvin H. Castle, manufac-
turing liquor, etc, on bail.
State VS.. G. w. Brockhan, unlawful
kF selling stock, on bail.
CIVIL CALENDAR
The civil calendar follows:
James M. Martin VS.. A. A. Hammer,
[suit on note.
F. E. Butler VS.. Andy Kuhnen, ct
|al, action to quiet title.
David Yates VS.. Frank Hy va we tom
MON, condemnation suit.
c. B. Knorr VS.. w. H. Cassidy, ct al,
foreclosure mortgage.
Ethel l.. johnson VS.. Albert p. John
Fon, suit ON account.
\ Empire National bank VS.. Enoeh
Fthristiansen, suit on note.
Andrew T. Griner VS.. Philip S. Grin
Her, ct al, foreclosure labor lien.
George Wood ct al VS.. George Be
pean ct al, foreclosure mortgage.
W. Hunt VS.. Union Warehouse Co.,
quit on contract
Kettenbach Co., VS.. Nels M. Nelson
|et al, foreclosure mortgage.
G. s. Howe VS.. Maybe Kyle Hayter.
|et al, suit to quiet title.
Z. s. Howe VS.. Maybe Kyle Hayter,
'et al, suit to quiet title.
CONDEMNATION SUIT
Idaho county VS.. William M. Free
man condemnation suit.
Paul Seiffert VS.. N. Y Mining Co.,
et al, foreclosure mining lien.
Charles w. Smith VS.. N. Y. Mining
% foreclosure mining lien.
otto Stienbach VS.. +. L. Leonard,
suit on account.
Ethel L. Johnson VS.. Albert P. John
son, suit for divorce.
f.. M. Frizzell VS.. G. A. Bicknell,
ct al. suit for damages.
W.. b. Trueblood VS.. Salmon River |
state bank, ct al, suit for damages.
frank e. Wyatt VS.. Hulda M. Brock
man, suit on account.
David Stickler VS.. Fred Karsten, ct
e. foreclosure of lien.
harry McCauley VS.. p. p. Puyear, ct |
al suit for specific performance.
!. state of idaho ETC., VS.. Grangeville |
savings & Trust Co., ct al, suit to APP
point special deputy, etc.
Wlnifred f. McGaffee VS.. Clark f.
'lcGaffee, suit for divorce.
Bank of Sites VS.. G. M. Butler, suit
On note.
SCOTT SUIT UP
! W. II. Casady ct al VS.. Warren f.
scout ct al, suit to enforce trust.
.. Ray johnson VS.. Salmon River
state bank, ct al suit for money.
:, FIRST National bank, Grangeville, vs.
7. }. Matthews Jr., ct al, suit to set
aside fraudulent transfers.
f. A. Lancaster VS.. Lulu M. Unzick-
=, suit for enforcement of trust.
franz Schlicker VS.. G. B. Campbell,
y al, suit on contract and for damages.
cottonwood Hardware Co., vs.. G. s.
y win, ct al, suit on note.
!, 'ohn p. Eimers, etc, VS.. Charles
yiark, ct al, foreclosure mortgage.
Ada 0. Smith VS.. William MacNeill,
suit on note.
wallace Bank & Trust Co., VS.. ].
living, suit on note.
dinner Clearwater Co., VS.. Austin /
'ofsuch, suit on note, etc.
;; a. Z. Schnell, ct al, VS.. Lula M. I'm
ecker, ct al, suit on note.
- II. Wright VS.. Joe Keener, ct al,
SUIT for injunction.
" 81 y, d. Strickfadcn, ct al, VS.. M. j.
Murray, ct al, suit for restraining
James B. Berry, ct al, VS.. Robert