The Powder River County examiner and the Broadus independent. [volume] (Broadus, Mont.) 1919-1935, 1921-07-29

(From the Montana Tarmer.)
W11e 0hoQla Sasn laePHssre

" WsAs SuS 10OQtAn8 CHrmeT.J
a iaSssasssssdd s's tho m:sss;s dollar.
deSt Sn he ,st di az husband y. have to pay
and Il i moi mone Ss t Swsd me this money
one ns sSi,s a. w wi. dle. Ya hsys TIE
ter axed en- "p q 20 ' fhs. to have thi. mat
the money. should ~ make Snala q viii w,,ly get
have some stock to divide un : With Ttias nv
swami to &c to the child. =. mT S,. l
band has spent that much Of NV Wy mo mus-
BEFORE BEFORE ! got this thousand doiiars.
az aea !, tell me wi, what to DO and how to
tana IL the wife does not sixn - l. eon-
90 =. man passed through here four
n niaht as4 and stopped at our place iii
some wire with him. There were liz
s seeo tho OF the wire wire. We have never
rustns could M'r this Is n lyans d. here
M ne SHOULD come along and we had
titled to it as it has been here in our
way and on our place so long.-ABC.
A: You have evidently loaned q
thousand dollars to your husband ana
evidence of the indebtedness. Appar-
emily you desire that he continue to
should he take 81: note th or t event
ana then hen ysn can either endorse this
70 yo4 tr death es,' or you can by will leave
- As to the second question. a mort
does net sign it, but the only doubt
mortgagee takes his lien subject to
the wife's dover, If she does not sign.
Section s. ito $40 Of our code provides that
gax se the ease ws d purchase rd9
er against the mortgages, regardless
or whether or not she signed, and
Section Sec o. - 1o9 indicates that the RUE is
section, so far. as l know. has noe
been construed by our court. For
So ,E l should advise that the wife
execution Of real estate mortgages.
As to the last question. the true
owner Of the wire would have right
s e. Claim ct the same unless the evidence
having left this property - for fo aar
years without inquiry. and without ex-
be presumption that he had abandon
ed It., and II sc. the person on whose
land 1t was left would have the right
tablish the fact that he had not aban-
doned it, and it was used, he would
have the right to recover the value.
in the inquiry, there seems little prob
ability that anyone will make claim tc,
the wire.
COntrucsing Line Fence
q. Can man be compel ed to pay
30 per cent of the cost of construct
ing line fence between himself and
his neighbor?-A b c.
he uses his land. The following sec
tons in the Montana Code apply to
Sec. 2OS5. "The occunants ~ al.
dining lands enclosed with fences. must
between their own and the next ad.
joining enclosure in equal shares, SO
lcng as both continue to enclose the
same: and such partition fence must
year. unless the occupants otherwise
Sec. 2oss. If any occupant of land
adjoining the enclosure of another en-
such other person. he must. within
three months thereafter, build his pro-
portion of such partition fence. or re-
fund to the owner thereof an equal
Of any partition fence Of such ad,
Joining occupant"
A portion OF Section 1895. as amend
ed BY Chapter 1872. Laws of 1917. reads
mutually bound equally to maintain:
"2. The fences between them, unless
one of them chooses to let his land lie
idle without fencing, in which case. If
fund to the other a just proportion of
the value. at that time. of any divi-
sion fence made BY the latter; prOvid-
ed, however, that using land for graz
Ing. or , pasturage Of any kind what
land and such land shall not be con-
sidered as lying idle under the pro-
visions of this act"