The Brookings register. [volume] (Brookings, Brookings County, S.D.) 1903-1971, 1921-01-13

in that II was ont ldDeleu &c
show the net weight or name and ad'
dress OF manufacturer.
Wheat shorts, manufactured by the
Herreid Mill Co, Herried, was mis-.
branded in that it vas not labeled to
| show the net weight or the name and
address of manufacturer or jobber.
Wheat bran, manufactured by the
Herreid Mill Co., Herried, was mis-
branded in that it was not labeled to
show the net weight or the name and
address of manufacture or jobber.
Raysol brand buttermilk starting
food, manufactured by the Standard
Chemical Co, Omaha, Neb., was adul-
terated and misbranded in that a sub
stance containing less fat and protein
was substituted for the product and
the percentages of fat and protein as
shown on the label were incorrect.
Standard brand Hog Regulator,
manufactured by the Standard Chem
ical Co., Omaha, Neb., was misbranded
III lld II COIIdLllcu hO bl"Ih "hIiiilOhJ'
although this substance was claimed
on the label to be present.
Standard brand milk meal, manufac-
tured by the Standard Chemical Co.,
Omaha. Neb., was adulterated and
misbranded in that it contained very
much less protein, a valuable ingre-
dient. than was claimed on the label,
and the crude fibre was much higher
than claimed on the label.
Standard brand Stock Powder, man
ufactured by the Standard Chemical
Co, Omaha, Neb., was misbranded in
that the label failed to show the per
centage of inert ingredient, ground
screenings.
Standard brand, Poultry Tonic, man
ufacWred by the Standard Chemical
Co. Omaha, Neb, vas misbranded in
that the label failed to show the per
centage of the inert ingredients,
ground screenings.
Prof. Gray's Poultry Tonic, distrib-
uted by John Sexton & Company, Chi
cago, was adulterated and misbranded
in that a mixture of different compO-
sitiOn than that claimed on the label
was substituted for the product and
neither the net weight nor the per-
centage Of inert ingredients was
shown upon the label.
DR.. Hess brand Horse Tonic, man
ufactured by Hess & Clark, Ashland,
Ohio, was misbranded in that the per-
centage of filler or inert ingredient
was not shown upon the label.
DR.. Hess brand Worm Powder, man
ufactured by Hess & Clark, Ashland,
Ohio, was a~dulterated and misbranded
in that cottonseed hulls were substi-
tuted for wheat bran in the mixture.
Lamprey brand Horse Worm Pow
der, manufactured by Lamprey Pro
ducts Co., st. Paul, Mimi, was mis-
branded in that the percentage of in
ert ingredients was not shown upon
the label and in that the preparation
contained no naphthalene, although
this was claimed to be present.
Lamprey brand Poultry Tonic, man.
ufactured by the Lamprey Products
Co., st. Paul. Mimi, was misbranded
in that the percentage of inert ingre-
dents was not shown upon the label.
Lamprey brand Heave Powders,
manufactured by the Lamprey Prod
ucts Co., st. Paul, Mimi, was mis-
branded in that the percentage of in
ert ingredients was not shown upon
the label.
Lamprey brand Cough and Distem-
per Remedy, manufactured by Lam
prey Products Co., st. Paul, Min,
was misbranded in that The percent
age of inert ingredients was not shown
upon the label.
Medicinal Hog Remedy, VOTERS
brand, manufactured by Wolters-Jeb.
son Remedy Company, Mitchell, was
misbranded in that the label was mis-
leading, giving the impression that the
substance vas q remedy for the cure
of hog cholera and a preventative of
hog cholera.
Equity brand Cottonseed meal, man.
ufactured by Union Oil Mills, Hub
bard, Texas, was m~isbranded in that
it contained less protein than claimed
on the label.
Plymouth Hog Remedy, manufac-
tured by Green Chemical Co., LeMars,
Ia, was m~isbranded in that it did not
contain all the ingredients claimed
on the label.
McNess Poultry Tonic, manufac-
tured by Nrst-McNess Company,
Freeport, ILL.,, was misbranded in that
the percentage of inert ingredients
was not shown upon the label.
Midwest Hog Stimulator, manufac-
tured by Midwest Remedy Co., Wa
hoo, Neb., was ~adulterated and mis-
branded in that sand had been sub
stituted in large part for the substance
and for the reason that the claims
upon the label were intended to mis-
lead the purchaser.
H. w. ---