The Birmingham age-herald., 1921-02-24
CONCERNING ROSY
 DOORS AND POLITICS

Washington. February 23-( Especial. J. The so-called radical wing of the national woman's party is not convinced that a rose by another name would lose nc sweetness. and as result, thinks that the party in camouflaging it's real intention makes a grave mistake
 The party. as is known, in reorganiz- ing adopted a resolution that ''the i'm. mediate work be the removal of lega disabilities of women.' Before voting down the resolution of the radical ele- ment. the conservatives explained thai legal disabilities included all of the "sub1ections' which the radical specified While the party, therefore, proceeds in broad sense to eliminate the 'eyil'' ir conventional American life, the radica element is already moving for another convention which would declare specifical. ly the existence of such evils and dedicate itself to their extirpation.
 The majority element did not disagree with the evils cited On the other hand it embraced the minority report. It ad- mitted that the minority report was in cluded in the majority under sthe tern disability" Enlarged therefore. the suf fragettes are embarked on campaign for the elimination of feminine disabili ties. specified in the resolution offered by Chrstal Eastman of New York, which is given the press today:
 Having achieved political liberty fol women, this organization pledges itself te make an end to the subjection of women in all it's remaining forms. Among our tasks we emphasize these:
 T. To remove all barriers of law or cus- tom or regulation which prevent womer from holding public office. the highest as well as the lowest. from entering into and succeeding at any profession, bust mess. from practicing any trade or joining the union of that trade
 .s2 So to remase the marriage laws and l so to modify public opinion that the DO. sition of the woman whose chosen worl is home-makinE and child-raising shal no longer be that of dependent entitled to her board and keep in return for hel services. but that of a full partner.
 ''3 To rid the country of all laws which deny women access to scientific informs ] tion concerniuz the limitation of families
 l A To rewrite the laws of divorce. c1
 1 inheritance. Of guardianship of children
 and the laws for tho regulation of sexua
 morality and disease, on a basis of equal
 ] ity-eaual rights. equal standards, equa
 ! responsibillty
 1 Further specifyine, leading feminists d.
 ! not hesitate to declare that in their pro gramme for removing the 'subjection' of women. and the making Of the wife 2 l 'partner" with the husband. they vii
 lendeavor to write laws under which 6
 wife who selects to do the home work
 1 will divide the salary of the husband This includes the idea that if the wfx< tselects, she may go abroad, and if the | husband is disinclined to cook and care flor the children. servants might be em. iployed to be paid by the husband and wife equally.
 In the case of illeGitimate birth. it is the idea of these women that the chile shall bear the name of his father, and 1 shall inherit just as if he was legitimate; that in the event more than one man is involved. the child shall bear the name o1 that one hiehest in favor with the moth ler. the msther to be the judge.