The Ocala banner., 1921-10-07
Prohibition Of Weed Would Mean
Big Financial Loss to
Allied Trades.
WHO USES THE MATCH?
The Smoker Mainiy-Also Responsible
for Spending Hundreds Of Millions
Annually for Licorice, Sugar,
Coal, Cigar Boxes, Tin
Foil, Etc.
BY cARRET SMITH


unnecessary because most pockets are
kept well supplied with the useful
little article? Anyhow, inasmuch as il
Is estimated that there are 30:000.000
tobacco users in the country, we would
guess that the answer TO that question
would run into the hundreds Of mil
lions.
For If it weren't for the smokers in
these days of electric lights how many
matches would be used? A pretty
small proportion Of the number of
these sticks of blazes'' produced in
the country every year Abolish to-
bacco and the match business would be
shot to pieces.
But the match business is only one
Of dozen or more allied industries
which derive large revenues directly or
indirectly from the tobacco trade and
would suffer heavily if national pro
hibition of tobacco were to go into
effect as some of our reformers would
have it, The annual sales of tobacco
products, based on retail prices, is es-
timated at 81 ,937 100000. OF tile cost
of producing and selling this quantity
of cigars, cigarettes and other forms
of the weed, some hundreds of million
dollars are paid out for other things
than the raw tobacco and labor of
making 1t up.
25,oo0,0oo Year'fo Boxes
For example, the tobacco trade con-
sunlcs each year 45,000,000 pounds Of
licoricc, 50OO0,000 pounds of sugar
both used in fiavoring tobacco. and
650,0C0 tons of coal. 1t is estimated
that the value of wooden cigar boxes
used is s25,000,0O0 year. quite an
item to the lumber business and TO
manufacturers of the boxes.
In making these boxes $4,000
pounds Of nails are employed Other
large items used in making and pre-
pairing tobacco for sale are tin and
lead foil, paper for bags and cigarette
wrappers, cloth for tobacco bags, la
bells, coupons, etc, involving the print
ing trade extensively.
Then building contractors and manu-
facturers Of machinery are largely in
terested. Investments in plants and
machinery employed in manufacture
ing tobacco are estimated at $102. .000,-
600. Replacement, up-keep and inter-
est on the investment make no small
sum annually.
And let realty men note there are
approximately 325,000 tobacco farms
in the country, with total estimated
valuation of S16O, COG, 900. OF further in
ferest TO real estate men is the fact
that there are 100000 retail establish
ments selling tobacco, involving total
rental and up-keep impossible to esti-
mate, besides the large amount of Of
fice space occupied by administrative
branches of the general business.
The insurance men, too. have their
share Of the pickings The tobacco
bus ness pays out annually S7,000000
in premiums in the United States.
And there are the railroads who reap
revenue from 2,210,0O0 tons of tobacco
products every year.
As for the advertising business.
here again 1t is impossible to form
any estimate OF the enormous annual
outlay.
The prohibition of tobacco would also
knock a good-sized hole in the receipts
Of the United States government.
The internal revenue receipts from
tobacco for the fiscal year 1920 amount
ed to $295, sos. .s355.44 Customs duties
provided an additional S25,000,000 in
round figures, making the total revenue
return to the government $4,000, 900.
influence on Popular Sentiment
1t is this interlocking of the tobacco
bus ness with SO many other interests
and the vast amount of financial losa
that would be involved in the abolition
Of tobacco that is one of the most se-
rious aspects OF the proposal to pro-
hibit the sale Of tobacco, a proposal.
however which has little support by
public sentiment If fhe newspaper esli-
tors of the country are correct IN their
estimate Of that sentiment.
In poll Of the editors made recently
by the Tobacco Merchants Association
Of the United States, through the Press
Service Company of New York City,
95 per cent Of the 7.S47 editors who
replied expressed the opinion that the
people Of their commun ties were op-
posed to any law against tobacco. As
these editors represent some 10000, 900
readers tile results form pretty gem
eral test Of national opinion.
In their remarks accompanying their
replies many Of the editors expressed
It as their opinion that the oppos tf0ns
Of their communities to the abolition
Of tobacco was based to some extent III
least on the damage such 4 change
would Do to the business interests Of
the community. This was particularly
true in the tobacco growing states and
centers where there we're large tobacco
plants
But when the extent Of the business
involved III the allied interests OF the