Norwich bulletin., 1921-11-10
WILLIM ANTIC

for half day work for the remainder of ] the school, year.
 The meeting opened at S2o o'clock with the reading of the minutes of fhe october meeting by Secretary P. A. Case The report of Truant Officer Jean E. Paulhus, showing nine cases ad1ustsd was accepted. The report of American ization Director C.. B. Gilman. covering the work of this department for October was accepted. Two hundred 1eeterS have been sent out and a card index system established Night school attendance av- verages so. and committees are workfne ! to get over 100 persons who cannot read. write or speak English, and ~no | thus far have refused to attend hIshI school 10 attend the Sessions. Two com n1unications from the State Board Of Ed Fucasion were read and Secretary Caso was given authority to write to A. D ! NE.-edith. commissioner Of educauoh, asking him to select the day when ne ] will be in this city to talk on scnoo! problems to members Of the town school committee and school committees Of the surrounding towns. The thfEn sdhooA 1 auditorium has been selected for The meeting place.
 1 It was stated that preparstaons for the
 yVindham Center school gro being 1usneo
 as fast as possible.
 The usual reading of bills took place and the meeting adjourned at S'4e clock. The December meeting is to DO held ar the home of Chairman F. E' Guild at wiudhan1, Chairman Gutic in- viting the members to meet with hi1n on the second Wednesday Of Decenoer' The invitation was accepted wltn ff'a4lAS' The superfor court opened Wednesday, morning at 10 o'clock when Judge "li- liam Nj Mdttbie heard the argumenxs oH the ase of Holden vs. Klhaf1. hili1ah
 vs Holden, and Kossezuk vs kiflisn' q { three-cornered suit the testimony et yfIrh was completed III court Tuesday Papers in the case were called for and Judge Maltbie reserved decision.
 | Announcement was made that the case ! pf V. H. Campbell & Company Vs' ! Frank g. Kennedy had been settled out Of court The case was second or the | list for Wednesday. The case of H. | Landau & Company vs. Meyer GoldWa- ter was announced as off the lst and the case of Caouette & Lang!oi vs John ] scnmohi on the list.
 The divorce suit of Dr. Burt lz. Dow vs. Bessie L. Dow, on the grounds of assertion was taken up. Dr. Dow testi- fed to being married at Waterbury. Vt. ln December 1900. shortly after moving with his wife to this city. After three
 or four years his wife became abusive and finally in 1915 they separated. For
 d number of years they resided in a fiat on Main street with their son, ant his wife made life miserable with her
 taunts. vile language and threats. She
 often said she hoped Dr. Dow would dit 1 or be killed She had also aiienated his sons affections. They desired a change | in residence for their son who was il at times and when he found one sht
 objected and made disturbance. Sht ! finally took a house without his consen and novel there His wife then agreed to make things more agreeable and h' 1 took his meals there for several weeks
 but his wife's old temper came back ant lthoy finally separated: An arrangemen was made whereby he was to pay tn, rent and S10 q week. This has beeI done ID to date. In 1918 when his wifi , and son were 1T with the influenza, Dr Weldon called him to the house. IT.
 had not lived with his wife because 0 | her actions. In 1915 he said he was |.
 a condition bordering 8 fiefvous break