The Glasgow courier. [volume] (Glasgow, Mont.) 1913-current, 1921-03-18

the time of trial. This was an action
in which Mr.. Hamry was suing R. C.
Arnold on a promissory note for $500,
and judgment was ordered entered for
Mr.. Hamry.
Case No. 1882, R. E. Hamry, VS.
Paul M. Kay, was then called. Plain
tiff appeared in person and by counsel,
Messrs. Norris, Hurd, Rhoades & Hal
lett, and the defenant failed to appear
either in person or by counsel. The
court ordered the default of Paul NJ.
Kay ordered for failure to appear at
the time of trial. This was an action
in which r. f. Hamry was suing Paul
M. Kay on a promissory note for $500
and judgment was ordered entered for
Mr.. Hamry.
Case No. 1924 was then called, Her
man Vogel VS.. Rhodes Printing Com
pany and w. E. Rhodes. Mr.. Vogel
appeared in person and by counsel,
Norris, Hurd, Rhoades & Hallett, and
the defendants failed to appear either
in person or by counsel, and their de-
fault was ordered entered by the court
for failure to appear at the time of
trial. This was an action on a pro-
missory note for $500 and judgment
was ordered entered in favor of Mr..
Vogel for the full amount and interest
and attorney fees.
Case No. 4S38, Walter Irgins VS.
Mamie B. Cooper, was called and the
attorneys for the respective parties
stated that the case had been settled
out Of court and could be dismissed,
which was so ordered by the court.
On Monday, March 14th, case No.
4844, Ray Lamb VS.. William DeMesse-
maker, was called and both parties re-
sponded ready for trial. Messrs. Nor
ris, Hurd, Rhoades & Hallett appeared
as counsel for the plaintiff and Messrs.
Slattery & Kline as counsel for the
defendant. On stipulation of counsel
this case was tried to the Court, and
| jury was waived. This case involved
claim for wages alleged by Mr.. Lamb
to be due him for work done for Mr..
| DeMessmaeker, on an express con-
tract, for taking care of his stock
while Mr.. DeMessmaeker took trip
to the old country about year ago.
| Many witnesses were sworn and eX-
amned for each side, and at the con-
clusion of the evidence the court took
the case under advisement, each side
! to prepare and submit their findings
to the court on or before March 28th.
On Tuesday, March 18th, Case No.
1925, Traders State Bank of Poplar, VS..
j. l.. Atkinson, was called and both
parties responded ready for trial. The
| bank appeared by the counsel, Messrs.
Norris, Hurd, Rhoades & Hallett, and
| the defendant apparel by Messrs.
| Slattery G. Kline. This is an action
in which the bank was suing DR.. At
| kinson of Poplar, on promissory note
for 81 10000, and DR. Atkinson was de-
Tending the action on the ground that
the note was signed and delivered con-
Hitionally; that one E. L. Olson sign
the same before it could be binding ON
him. The testimony was taken Tues
/ day and case argued to the jury on
/ Wednesday morning, and the jury re-
turned into the Court after about an
hours deliberation with a verdict for
DR.. Atkinson.
This being all the cases on the cal
endar to dispose of at this time all
/ jurors were discharged.
On March 10th, at 1870, the Court
ordered the clerk to draw 100 jurors
to report on April 4th, for the trial of
! cases set for that term, at which time
Judge c. E. Conner will preside for
Judge Borton, in cases in which Judge
Borton is disqualified.
Following is the calendar of cases
set for the April 4th term:
April 4th-State VS.. Kraft.
April 4th-Clark VS.. Townsend.
1