The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1921-02-24
LABOR RULES COST
ROADS MILLIONS
Public Directly Interested in
Effort to Stop Drain on
Carriers Income.
BIG SUMS FOR WORK NOT DONE
Railways Asking Labor Board to
Abrogate WastefuI Agreements
Made Under Federal Control.

"The. entire country, Its consumers,
its farmers, its wOrkmen, and even the
railway employees themselves, are di-
rectly interested with the railroads in
cutting down railway operating ex-
penses."
/. This is the keynote Of the case pre-
scented by the railroads to the United
States Railroad Labor Board, now in
session in Chicago.
The railroads have submitted evil
dence to the board to show why the
National Agreements affecting railway
shop labor should be abrogated, be-
lieving that this is vitality important
step in the process of reducing op-
Grating expenses.
This step is not only necessary to
insure adequate earning power to the
railroads, but will make possible an
ultimate reduction in rates.
The agreements were made by the
Railroad Administration just before
the end of Federal control The sum
total of the rules and working condl.
lions provided by the National Agree
ments have increased the operating
expenses of the railroads by hundreds
of millions, and have decreased the
efficiency and output of the employees
in other ways resulting in losses
which cannot be calculated in dollars
and cents.
For several weeks the railroads
have been multiplying instances of the
absurd and eXtravagant results of the
labor rules fastened upon them by the
National Agreements.
In one case cited before the board q
machinist was paid 1914 hours wages
for work all performed within eight
hours. This case illustrated the effect
of the rule that for each "call" the
worker is to be paid five hours wages
even if he works only tep minutes.
The case Of a car repairer on the
Virginian Railway, who was recently
paid over $1,000 for services which
were never rendered, and in addition
the same amount of overtime as was
made by his gang, was another exam
pie.
In connection with the rule that
none but mechanics or apprentices
shall do mechanics work, the follow
ing was cited to indicate its unfair
ness:
Five Hours Pay for 80 Minutes Work
"The Ell .Paso & Southwestern Rail,
road recently had an engine set out al
oil tir,1n c
ready to go to its train it developed
that window light was broken in the
cab. 1t was necessary for the foreman
to call a carpenter to do the work thai
he could have performed himself in s
few minutes. The train was delayed
one hour and 80 minutes, and the EN-
ployee called to do the work was PAID
five hours for work requiring 30 min.
utes."
The inefficiency created in inflexible
application of the rules contained IL
the agreements in question was illus
trated in the following actual case
which recently occurred on the Balti,
more & Ohio Railroad:
san engine was placed In the
shops for certain repairs. Because
of the provisions of the National
Agreement it was necessary that
members Of five crafts perform
parts Of this work; formerly, the
entire operation was performed by
the members of but two crafts"
$6,5oo,ooo for Work Not Performed
How the railroads of the country
were compelled to pay almost $6,5O0,.
900 in the first six months Of 1920 for
service not rendered because of the
effects Of but one Of the 1872 rules in,
cluded in the Shop Crafts National
Agreement was shown in the testi
mony.
This punitive payment for work new.
er performed was required by a clause
in the National Agreement, which pro.
vides that when employees are re-.
CURED to check in and out on their
own time they will be paid one hour
extra at the close of each week.
The rigid classifcations of labor,