The Washington herald., 1921-02-04
SUPREME COURT OF THE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
AxsIEnments for Today.
CRIMINAL DIVISION NO. 1
Motions and Sentences.

United States VS.. Harry Hawkins,
william NICK. Stewart, Roland A.
Fields. John E. Brown, Clarence p.
Sewers. william Cush. jr., william
Ernest. John Stewart, Stanley Fraz-
ier. George Wilson alias Hamel,
Landon Lewis, George Jordan, Jo-
seph r. Rollins and all cases left
over from last assignment.
Arraig
United States VS.. J. B. Williams
alias Wilson. John NJ. Zell. Clarence
w. Southard. Marjorie B. Chew,
Arthur Dawson, Joseph Snyderman,
Edward Beckley. Frederick NJ.
Burrs, John F. Scott, Earl J. Thorn
as, Carl w. Dean. Eugene Martin,
Charlie Smith, James H. Bates, Ray
mond Gray. Louis Dickerson, Alex
ander Anderson, Willie Sawyer.
william Dixon, George Bolden,
Henry Walker, Harry J. Hedgepeth,
Gabriel Luff, Alonzo Ludley, Will
lam Faulkner, Joseph ]. Perkins,
James Gilbert, Charles Warren,
Dennis Baker. Aurora V. Woody,
Ayoob Rizik and Raphael Sawaya.
CRIMINAL DIVISION NO 2.
Motions and Sentences.
United States VS.. Edward T.
Roney. Fred Thompson. James E,
Jamerson and Samuel Line.
CIRCUIT DIVISION No. 1.
Motions.
Mosher VS.. Karrick. Motion Of
plaintiff for new trial Attorneys
Bell & Marshall-Merillat & Rich
ardson.
Mosher VS.. Karrick Motions
of plaintiff and defendant for new
trials and to Ak costs. Attorneys
same as No. l.
3 Parker VS.. Clark. Motion to
strike out plaintiffs AFFIDAVIT. At
torneys Clarke-Hudson
Bell vs.. Loughran ex. Motion
to strike out plaintiffs pleadings
and reform same. Attorneys Wer-
nimount-Robb.
Walker & Co. VS.. Sloan. Mo-
ticn for judgment under rule 1S.
Attorneys Wilson, Pall-Hudson.
Rauscher VS.. Cunningham. De-
murrer to declaration. Attorneys
Easby-Smith, Fleharty & Hogan &
Grant.
I Moore & Hill VS. Robinson. Mo-
tion to quash summons-to dismiss
and to strike out plain
tfff's afidavit. Attorneys Costigan
Hudson.
Philips VS.. Lipschutz. Demurrer
to plea Attorneys Eason-Hudson.
Taylor vs.. Brinck. Motion for
judgment under rule 19. Attorneys
Williamson-Clagg
10 Clatke VS.. Hawkins. Motion
for judgment under rule 10. Attor-
neys Hewlett-Hill.
II Washington Market Co. VS..
Mammoth Amusement Co. Motion
to strike out plaintiffs affidavit.
Wolf-Bel, Marshall C
Rice,
10 Walker & Co. VS.. Mason. Mo-
ton to Quash summons and dismiss
and to strike out plain
tiff's affidavit Attorneys Hutchin-
son-Hudson.
13 Towles VS.. Washington Termi-
nal Co. Motion of defendant 3. &
o. r. r. to dismiss. Attorneys Lam
bert & Yeatman-Hamilton & Ham
ilton.
IA Grooner VS.. Noore's Theater
Corp. Motion for judgment under
73d rule. Attorneys Hoehling. PeelIe
& Ogilby-Lambert-
Is Dimisa VS.. Reynolds. Motion
to strike out plaintiffs amended
affidavit. Attorneys Grant-Hudson.
16 Nelson VS.. Yanckler. Motion
to quash summons and dismiss
and strike out plaintiffs
affidavit. Attorneys KimbalI-Hud-
son.
II Ives VS.. Weimer. Motion to
vacate judgment. Attorneys Haw-
ken & Havell-Hudson.
1S Walshe VS.. Streeter. Motion
for judgment under rule 10. Attor-
neys Reeves-Offutt & Inlay
10 Hellmuth VS.. Weber. Motion
to strike out pleas. Attorneys Col
laday & Pettus-Clarke.
20 Takoma Park Bank VS.. Moore's
Theater Corporation. Motion for
Judgment under 73d rule. Attor-
neys, Wilson, HuIdekoper and Lesh
Lambert.
21 Tucker VS.. Ives. Motion for
bill of particulars. Attorneys, Nav
Kinney and Gardiner-Hawken and
Havell.
22 Stsndiford VS.. Card. Motion
for jury of inquisition. Attorneys,
Wolf and Tanner-Hudson.
% D. c. to the use of Fraley vs..
Wood ct al. Motion to strike out
declaration. Attorneys, Stearman-
Bell, Marshall and Rice.
"a Williams VS.. D. c. Motion for
leave to file additional pleas. At
torneys, Rhoades, Cromelin and
Mawpfn-Stephens jr.