The Chickasha daily express. (Chickasha, Indian Territory [Okla.]) 1899-current, 1921-04-21

WE WOULD LIKE TO ASK THE TRADES COUNCIL OF
ccKAsA WHETHER THEY APPR2vE APP , SUCH SUCH IACrGs
BY THE LOCAL UNIONS TOWARDS THE LOCAL RETAIL
CRocERS IN THIS CITY.
We further understand that Committee from the Culinary
Union instructed Mr. Prutt who is member of the Ret Clerks
Union and salesman Garvey Bros. Store and who
lives Early Hotel that he either from the Early
HOTEL that he would be cassd unfair and that his place
of business meaning Gsrvey Store would be placed their
called Unfair List We notice that Mr. Pruitt has moved
from the Early Hotel and understand that specific charge
has been placed against him.
WE WOULD LIKE TO ASK THE TRADES COUNCIL If
THEY APPROVE OF SUCH TACTICS AND DEMANDS
AGAINST ONE OF THEIR OWN MEMBERS. WE WOULD
The The ArAoRTY a0R yT TO pcT4TE WHERE AN INDIVIDUAL
SHALL EAT AND SLEEP.
We are informed by Mr.. and Mrs. j. T. Gosse that the
of March 2d immediately after the publication of the
daily paper directing inquiries to the Chickasha Trades
Council that Mr. H. Csppeman who is member Of the Retail
Clerks Union in this city which aate with the Trades Council
called the Early Hotel and asked them to write kind of
that they wanted and that would be signed by the
Union and there would be further controversy in the Cosseti
Hotel matter. and Mrs Cosse stated Mr. Cappeman
that they had found that not for them to have
any kind of with Union for them to their
AFFAIRS that they did not have another Union Contract
while they in business.
WE WOULD LIKE FOR THE TRADES COUNCIL TO AD-
WISE US WHAT THEY THINK ABOUT THAT.
On the evening of March 2Sh very respectable citizen of
city and gentleman who member of the Barber Union,
also stated that he carried card the Imster Truck Drivers
Chaueus union stated that considerable controversy
of the Union meetings and that the conclusion
that the Unions Chicasha could not hurt the Gosse Ho
tel everyone Mr. j. c. Howard
agtator Union circles and that the would be
off if he would leave We glad that of the citizens
preciate the fact that this committee directly
fight Organized Labor. We that labor has right
organize The attitude which the representative business
wish record against the tactics used by The
Trades Council in this city effect their demands which
considered unfair.
question number eight ask the Trades Council of
Chckasha advise the public what tactics they expected
in their method of cooperation with the public spirited cti
of Chasha make this BETTER cleaner and pleas
city live in IF the tactics which they using along
the lines which they work. do not believe that their
spirit of cooperation such that will better conditions
people Chcasha have great desire make this better
city, The representative business trying to work to that
specific end We want the cooperation of ALL but will expect
that equal basis for every living citizen midst
The Courts decree holds that Union Labor col
lectvely individually responsible for when conspiracy
shown before the Secondary boyco illegal and
normal and legitimate objects and combination
conspre in restraint of Trades whatsoever they doing
violation of the Antitrust laws We do believe that the Or
ganzed Labor association of Chcasha individual
Der thereof would member knowingly violate law
the statute Of this great Common Wealth.
Mr. j. L. Hart General Manager of the Hart Machine
Company Of this City, that he long since employed
young who member OF the Carpenters Union of Dali
las Texas This badly need of employment
himself his wife and babies That the second day after
he employed this who this town, that
by representative of the local of this city
who he this Mr. Hart inquired to why
he should him. The that they felt that there
sufficient people this do all the carpenter work that
neeed that necessary for import
additional workmen Mr. Hart did fire the This
nan continued his employ until he left of his accord