The Washington herald., 1921-02-11

IL Ives VS. weimer. Hawker 4
Havell-Hudson.
IL Wslshe VS. Streeter. Attys Reeve.
-offut & Inlay.
13 Halhmuth VS. Weber. Atty
Colloday & Peters-Carke.
IA Takoma Park Bank VS. Moore.
Theater Corp. Attys wilson-Lam.
bert.
IS Tucker VS. Ives Attys Nav
binney & Gardner-Hawker & Hs.
veil.
16 Cusack VS.. Smith. Attys stohl'
man-Collins.
II Standard Savings Bank VS.
Stone ct al. Attys Richardson
Sullivan.
IS Pyne VS. Hertz. Attys Rhoodc
Hudson.
10 O'Brien VS. Jari. Attys will
iamson-Hudson
20 Wash Motor Exchange VS. Car.
raway. Attys Strasburger & Kappa
port-Whiteford.
81 Ryan VS. Findeman. Attys Ro.
yer & Strickland-Hart.
% Henry ct al VS. Dingman. Atty,
Offut & Inlay-Daird & Keene.
23 Shannon VS. Peck. Attys Of
fut G. Inlay-Boyd.
"a Van Senden vs. Sheet ct al
Attys Poe-Giesy.
25 Herman VS. Miller Attys Raj
ferty-Hudson.
26 Rivers VS. Cox. Attys Ellison
Lang.
27 Kennard VS. Sender. Attys
Smith-Jeffords & Dutton.
2S D. c, the use OF Fraley VS.
Word ct al Attys Stearman-Bell
Marshall & Rice.
29 Fishbein VS. Barbogolla. Attys
Peltzman & wemer-Hudson.
30 Fishbein VS.. Barbogolla- Attys
Wemer-Hudson
81 Linkins VS.. wormley. Attys
Linkins-Hudson.
80 Linkins VS. Boyd. Attys Link
ins-Hudson.
SO BIewett VS. Mason. Attys Van
Doren-Quinn.
"a Henry VS. Hart. Attys Rhoode
Hart
35 De Lilly VS. Cap Traction Co,
Attys Lambert & Yeatman-DuRlop.
CIRCUIT DIVISION NO. -
Motion Day.
Dickinson VS. Martin. Attys
DOwning-DeLacy.
Am Indemnity Co VS. Parker ct
al. Attys Darr. Whiteford & Darr
-Barger.
Barton Refrig Co VS. Sterns.
Attys Kenyon & Macfarland-Stein.
T2alIa rT
James-Hudson.
5 Waever ct, al VS. Adkins. Attys
Sullivan-Lang.
6 Standiford VS. Card. Attys A.
Wolf-Hudson.
Cent Construct Co VS. Md Cas-
ualty Co. Attys Hammer-Prentiss.
s Wash Mkt Co VS. Mamm Anus
ent Co. Attys Wolf-Bel, Marshal
& Rice.
J 3 Jones VS. Corby Baking Co.Attys
Stearman & Hollander-Rosenb
10 Hurley VS. Clark. Attys Will
iamson-Hudson.
IL Bragg VS. So Ry Co. Attys Of
futt & Imlay-HamiIton & Hamilton.
'12 Scoenfield VS. Cap Taxi Corp.
Attys Clephane, Latimer & Hall
Wright & Ershler.
13 Oakes VS. Trader. Attys Gar
rett-Turnage.
IA McAlester-Edwards Coal Co VS.
Payne ct al. Attys Syme-Mahaffie
& Wright.
10 Wash Coal Co VS. Kraesel. Attys
Richardson & Bastian-Newmyer.
16 Sansbury Co VS. Zimmisch &
other cases. Attys Gertman-Staf-
ford.
II Raebach VS. Dergovitz. Attys
Rosenberg-.Tobriner & Graham,
is Guaranty Trust Co VS. MCGUIRE
Attys Wampler & Woods-,Hudson.
~ Barry VS. Pierson. Attys
Wright & Ershler-Hudson
20 Barry VS. Brown. Attys Wright
& Ershler-Hudson.
Il Semmes Motor Co VS. Donovan.
Attys Sweeney-Laskey & Schick.
hlnklns VS. Stewart. Attys Lin
kins & McGlue-Hudson
70 TaIlaterro, trustee VS. Revness
ct al Attys Littlepage & Taliaferro
-Peyser.
"a Terrell & Little VS. Knsbe
Attys Warner-Hudson.
EQUITY DIVISION No. ?.
"opoh bay.
The Chesapeake & Pot Tel Co
VS. utz ct al. Attys Kenyon.r& NC
Farland-Hufty.
Sullivan VS. Sullivan. Attvs
Beller & Mallan-Coombe.
3 CHAMPION VS. Champion. Attys
Monohan-King,
4 Norwood VS.. ChandIee. Attvs
Edison Samuels & wolhaupter -
Bowers.
Morrison VS. Morrison. .Attys
Hawken & Havell-Smith g. Innp
6 Associate Collegiate AIumnae
VS. Hay. Attys Johnson-Carlyle
Howe & Swayze.
Z Sabbs VS. Sabbs. Attys Hufty-
Thompson & Laskey.
8 stabler VS. Linkins. Attys Lam
bert & Yeatman--wolf.
Harris VS. Harris. Attys Rhoade
Hoover.
10 Hack VS. Cissell. Attys Shinn-