The pioneer-review. [volume] (Philip, Haakon County, S.D.) 1920-current, 1921-04-21

mixture Of bran and shorts was
substituted for shorts and the mix
ture CONTAINED less protein than
claimed on the label.
Wheat middIings, manufactured
by Redfeld Cooperative Mills, of
Redfeld, was misbranded in that
it was not labeled to show the net
weight.
Red Dog Flour manufactured by
the Marshall Milling Co., Marshall,
Mimi. was mlsbranded in that the
product contained less fat and less
protein than claimed on the label.
Wheat bran manufactured by
the Farmer Cooperative Milling
Co. Bowdle, was misbranded in
that it was not labeled to show
the net weight.
Wheat shorts, manufactured by
the Farmers Cooperative Milling
Co. Bowdle, was misbranded in
that it was not labeled to show
the net weight.
| Wheat bran, manufactured by
the Dell Rapids Mill, Dell Rapids,
was misbranded in that it was not
labeled to show the net weight &C
the name and address of ma1.u-
facturer.
Wheat mixed feed manufactu~-
| ed by the Dakota Roller Mills. Sci
by, was misbranded in that 1t was
not labeled to show the net weight
or the name and address of manu-
! { f;as;tiii.ei. DC tsfe OF i0bber.
Mixed feed, manufactured by
the Dakota Roller Mills, was mis-
branded in that it was not labeled
TO show the net weight or the
name and address of manufacture
er or jobber.
Red Dog Flour, manufactured
by the Aberdeen Mill Co., Aberdeen
was misbranded in that it was not
labeled to show the net weight or
name and address or manufactur-
er.
Wheat shorts, manufactured by
the Herried Mill Co., Herried, was
misbranded in that it was not lab
Ieled to show the net weight or
the name and address of mnufact-
urer or jobher.
Wheat bran, manufactured by
the Herried Mill Co., Herried, was
misbranded in that it was not lab
eled to show the net weight or
the -name and address Of nanufact
urer or jobber.
Raysoi brand buttermiik start
ing food manufactured by the Sta
ndard Chemical Co., Omaha, Neb b.
was adulterated and misbranded in
that substitute containing less
fat and protein was substituted
for the proddct and the percent
ages of fat and protein as shown
on the label were incorrect.
Standard brand Hog Regulator,
manufactured by the Standard
Chemical Co., Omaha, Neb. was
misbranded in that it contained no
black antimony although this sub
stance was claimed on the label to
be present.
Standard brand milk meal, manu-
factured by the Standard Chemical
Co, Omaha, Neb. was adulterated
and misbranded in that it contain
ed very much less protein, valua-
bic Ingredient, than was claimed
on the label, and the crude fibre
was much higher than claimed on
the label.
Standard brand Stock Powder
manufactured by the Standard Che
mical Co., Omaha, was misbranded
in that the label failed to show
the percentage of inert ingredient
ground screenings.
Standard brand, Poulrty Tonic
manufactured by the Standard Che,
mical Co., Omaha, Neb. was mis-
branded in that the label failed tc
SiioFF tAII PCiSCil1dgS VI IIc liSIl
ingredients, ground screeningJ
Prof. Gray's Poultry Tonic, dis
tributed by John Sexton & Com.
pany, Chicago, was adulterated and
misbranded in that a mixture OF
different composition than that
claimed on the label was substit-
uted for tn product and the net
weight nor the percentage of inert
ingredients was shown upon the
label.
DR.. Hess brand Horse Tonic ma.
nufactured by Hess & Clark, Ash.
land, Ohio, was misbranded an that
the percentage of filler or inert
ingredient was not shown upon the
label.
! DR.. Hess brand Worm Powder
manufactured by Hess & Clark
Ashland, Ohio was adulterated ano
misbranded in that cottonseed hull
were substituted for wheat in the
mixture.