The Washington herald., 1921-03-11


4 . In re bankruptcy Moorhead q
Eimore- Attys.. Hoehling. Peelle 4
ogilby.
3 Berry VS. Conn. Attys. welch q
Lane--Wheatley.
J Petty W Petty. Attys. Hutchi-
s Sullivan VS. Sullivan. Attys,
Gusack-Fowler.
6 wharton VS. Wharton. Attys.
McNeill & vandoren-Shea
| Schultz VS. Wagner. Attys. Glib
son & Muilen-Hawken q Hayell.
| Lang VS. Lang. Attys, werni-
mont-ottenberg.
| . Individual Drinking Cup Co. VS.
stott. Attys. Milan. Milan, Hall &
Van Sant--Church.
10 Kantz VS. Kantz. Attys. Brez--
Pope. sa.s
IL Nourse VS. Williams. Attys.
Fleharty-Matthews
IL Roy VS. Roy. Atty, Higgins.
1s Wash. Cadillac Co. VS. Ryan's
Auto Service. Attys, Ellis. Fergu-
son & Colquitt-Linkins.
IA Fid. a Dep. Co. VS. Rocky River
Dry Docks. Attys. Hogan-White-
ford.
Is Moncure VS. Moncure. Attys.
wampler-Sherier.
1s Bell VS. Bell. Attys. McNeill-
| O'Brien.
II Duley VS. Duley. Attys. Crosse
man.
| Is Lander VS. Gall. Attys. Nor
gan-wheatley & Hogan.
10 Grosner VS. Grosner. Attys.
/ n har n e.
Graham.
20 Schwickardi VS. Kemp. Attys.
Giesy-Brandenburg.
81 In re John H. Millhollen.
Attys. Rogers-Bastian '& Yeat-
man.
20 Emerson VS. Emerson. Attys.
2s O'Reilly VS. Amer Telegra-
phone Co. Attys. Sullivan & John
son-Gatley & Shinn.
"a Guilt VS. Gulli. Atty, Shinn.
Is Higdon VS. Higdon. Attys. Wood
l-Carrington.
rs johnson VS. Johnson. Attys,
Bailey
81 Steward VS. Steward. Attys.
Wampler & Wood.
IS Kelly VS. Kelly. Attys, Patter-
son-O'Brien.
IS siseold VS. sisgold. Attys. Wolf
I-Newmyer
30 Quinn VS. Easterday. Atty.
Burkart.
81 Walls VS. Walls. Attys. Scott
Bell.
SO In re Wash Theater Prod Co.
Attys, Lambert & Yeatman.
33 Zepp VS. zepp. Attys. coombe
& Emerson.
"a Price VS. Sansbury Co. Attys.
wallace-Gertman-,
EQUITY DIVISION No. 2.
Not In Session.
No Assignment for Today.
CIRCUIT DIVISION No. 1.
Proceedings.
62435 Lewis VS. w. r. & E Co
Trial resumed e. jury respited to
Monday next. Attys. f. H. Jackson
Barbour & whiteford.
64936 U. S. ex rel Creary VS. Sec'y
Of War. Order substituting party
deft.
e505s U. s. ex rel French VS. Sec'y
Of War. Order substituting party
deft.
605ss Gauzza VS. W. r. & E. Co
Verdict for pltf & judgment on ver-
dict VS. deft for $500 without inter-
ests or costs.
Assignment for Today,
1 Eichelberger VS. c & p Tele-
phone Co. Lambert, Yeatman-Ken-
yon & Macfarland. attys.
| 2 Henckels VS. Scott. Henry, Brad.
ley-wilson. Huidekoper & Lesh,
attys.
weinstein VS. Hahn. Strasbur-
ger. Rappaport-Toomey, Gallagher.
attys.
Thornton VS. w r & E Co. New
myer-whiteford, attys.
5 Duehay VS. Mccoy. Robb-Hud-
son. attys.
McGahey VS. w &E Co. Lam
bert. Yeatman-whiteford attys.
2 Maury VS. Logan. Darr, white-
i ford & Darr-Grant, attys.
Snow VS. Reus. McGlue-Bowles,
attys.
| 8 Fenwick VS. Wilmer -Romberg
Co. wheatley-Hoover. attys.
10 Dulaney VS. w &c o Dominion
Ry Co. Rufin-Lambert. attys.
IL Connolly VS. Warren. Hudson
Tucker, Brown. attys.
| IL, 13 and IA Walker & Co VS.
Chauttand, Thomas. Seymour. Arch
er & Smith-Hudson. attys.
Is Walker & Co VS. Rodier. Brad
ley-Hudson. attys.
16 Hills VS. Southern Ry. Peters
Hamilton & Hamilton, attys.
II Rust VS. Ballard. Bowie-Hud-
son, attys.
Is Baretz VS. Rosendorf. Marsh
Fowler, attys.
10 Grosner VS. Moore's Theater
Corporation. Hoehling, Peelle &
Ogilby-Lambert. Yeatman, attys.
60 Shea VS. New Taxicab Co. Gar
diner, Proctor-Newmyer, attys.
81 Same VS.. Same attys.
z2 Grady VS. Roberts. McGlue-
Hudson, attys.
20 Grady VS. Farrell. McGlue-
Hudson. attys,
"a Payne VS. Magee. Gibson, Null
/ 1a