Norwich bulletin., 1921-06-25
GRoTON INJUNCTION CASE
 HEARD BY JUDGE GREENE

Judge Gardiner Greene took the pa pers and reserved decision in the in- junction suit of William A. Graham and others vs. Johan G. Jannson and others at the superior court motion list ses- sion here Friday morning.
 The plaintiffs who are William A. Graham, Arthur s. Graham, and Clifford E. Graham of Groton, Annie F. Graham of New London, Emma F. Billings of Hartford, Sybil S. Graham and Rob- ert N. Graham, of Long Island city, seek an injunction against Johan G. Jann son and Axei Hugo Johnson of Groton to restrain them from alleged trespass upon a 3S acre tract of land in Gro ton.
 Other matters on the motion list were disposed of as follows:
 | Harris vs. Allen, ct al. pleadings or | dered in two weeks; Mary Danko vs. l John Danko, that defendant be defaulted ] for failure to comply with the order of 1 court, ordered on uncontested list un- | less order compiled with on or before | first Tuesday of August; Edward T. i Ellsworth vs. Elizabeth H. Ellsworth, ali- mony pendente lite, off; allowance to l defend 10 be paid in six weeks Webb | vs Johnson, leave to file notice as to
 
 ! leave to file notice as to hearing in | damages" both off; McWilliams, ct al, vs. Morton, ct al. argument of demur- rer demurrer overruled Wolinsky vs | Wolnsky, ct al, 1, disclosure of defense | ?, if no defense, judgment of foreclosure | and limitation of time William G. Spen- cer vs. Annie M. M. Spencer, second or der of notice; Bertha Chapman Latham
 vs. Charles F. Latham. that the defend
 ant be held in contempt for failure tc | comply with order of court in relation tC
 payment of alimony; Mildred A. Arnold
 vs. Leslie P. Arnold, judgment, all off
 Ridgewood National Bank vs. Schultz
 ct al, disclosure of defense or judgmen
 of foreclosure by sale. judgment as pc , stipulation; Armstrong, ct al, vs. Lev erone argument of demurrer, off 1; Will
 vs Wills, ct al, disclosure of defense. o , judgment, of; Ruth Zero vs. Anthon,
 Zero. alimony pendente lite, $7 per wee
 payable weekly and to commence on week from Friday; Bertha Chapma 7 Latham vs. Charles E. Latham, that tn
 order of the court for payment of ali
 mony pendente lite be vacated, off; Co . hen. ct al, vs. New London Fruit . Produce Co.,, judgment, Moran. vs. O t Connor, Xxx, disclosure of defense C
 judgment, both off Venditto vs. Tane i bond for prosecution. $75 in two weeks l Mary F. Wells vs. James L. Wells mo . tion for more specific statement to ! s filed on or before Aug. 1; Woodwort . vs. W. A. Smith & Co. Inc, 1, order [ e pay appraisers, granted, 2, order to pa
 preferred wage claims, granted; Ags Y vs. Ironsides Board Corp leave to fl Il amendment to answer, granted ar |. amendment filed; Frank Beatrice V f Francis Foster Beatrice, 1, allowance
 defend, s35 in 30 days, 2, alimony pel s dente lite, $7 per week, payable week. a to commence one week from Frida! d Bertha Chapman Latham vs. Charles e Latham, that the defendant be allowt
 to file answer and cross-complair '. granted Mary Jane Huling vs Harry 1T Huling that new party be adde e granted, default opened; Mildred l. Arnold vs Leslie P. Arnold. that d e fault be opened and defendant allow
 to plead default opened, pleadings
 one week; Belt, EXT, vs. Belt, ct !;
 1, that Henry H. Pettis be appoint r guardian ad litem of Alta Belt ol
 of the defendants, a minor. granted the case be reserved for advice of S 't pre1ne court. reserved.