The New York herald., 1921-04-19
BROKER MAY SOON .
BE UNDER ARREST
Andrews, Dual Husband, to
Surrender Tomorrow to
Greenwich Prosecutor.
WILL FACE TWO CHARGES
First Wife's Attorney Denies
Reconciliation Report-No
Trace Of Wife No. =.
WILL FACE TWO CHARGES

Thomas r.. Walsh, prosecuting at
yesterday that Jacob J. Lazaroe, coun-
sci for Herbert Thornton Andrews, the
broker who maintained two wives un-
der one roof for three months, has
promised TO surrender his client to-
morrow. Mr. Walsh issued warrant
last week for the arrest of Andrews on
charges of perjury and bigamy. The
broker was not arrested. Mr.. Walsh
his attorney.
The perjury and bigamy charges
against Andrews grew out or the
brokers' marriage in Greenwich on
January % last 10 Esther Tatnall a
former stenographer, who now Is
known as the second Mrs. Andrews
Mr.. Walsh alleges that the perjury
consists of Andrews having falsely
stated he was a single man at the
time.
Mr.. I.azaroe denied recently that a
warrant had been issued for the arrest
OF his client This denial was called 70
the attention Of Mr.. Walsh
II think Mr. Lazaroe must be mis-
| taken" Mr. Walsh said. because several
DAYS ago he called me up here and in
\ formed him that / had issued warrant
for Andrews and he promised to surren-
/ der him by the middle of this week. PROD
! ably Wednesday. For this reason nave
not sent a policeman TO get Andrews.
II believe there is some mistaken mn
preston OF the Connecticut laws In rela-
ton to bisamy. There seems to be an
idea that the Connecticut law cannot
! touch man who enters into blgamous
4 marriage in this State but who faHs 10
consummate II here. That is mistake.
Mr. walsh's attention was called TO
the case of Joseph Merritt Lane former
Vice-ChancelIor, against whom charges
were preferred similar 10 those now
pending against Mr.. Andrews.
Lane was not prosecuted" the Prose
cutor said, because so far as we were
able TO ascertain that marriage never
was consummated anywhere
Eugene A. Dohohue of 149 Broadway.
stating he was the personal representa-
tive of Mrs Maud Andrews. the FIRST
wife. issued a statement denying the re-
port that she and the broker might pos
SlDfN DE TcCpltllcu
.srhe report that Mrs. Andrews Will
consent to or is seeking a reconciliation
is absolutely unfounded,' he said. she
is going to press the divorce suit just as
vigorously as she can.
Mrs. Maud Andrews Is to appear be-
fore the Hudson county (New Jersey
Grand Jury to-day in answer TO the
subpoena served upon her several days
ago. John Y. Clark. assistant prosecu'
tor Of Hudson county, said that Mrs
Andrews would be asked 10 tell whal
size knows OF the alleged relations be
tween her husband and Mrs. Esther Tat
ma II Andrews, the second wife.
The whereabouts of Mrs. Andrews NO
2 continues to be a mystery. When
seen at his office. 20 Broad street, An
drcws said he did not know where she
Is and declined 10 make any statement
lr regard to his marital difficulties.
Dispatches from Pittsburgh stated
that the second Mrs. Andrews would re-
turn and live with the broker II his first
marriage is proven TO be illegal, as Mr.
Andrews has claimed. This statement
was made by II. d. Hirsch. counsel foi
Mrs. Christine Tatnall mother Of the
second wife, who has come to her daugh'
ter's rescue Mr.. Hirsch admitted tina
the young woman is in hiding but stated
definitely that she is not in Pittsburgh
as had been supposed
Tenants OF the apartment house a
1850 Hudson Boulevard, Jersey CITY
where the first Mrs. Andrews lives
nave asked the owners, IT was learned
I that she be allowed TO continue 70 max
her residence there.