Yerington times. [volume] (Yerington, Nev.) 1907-1932, 1921-02-23
MUCH BUSINESS IN
DISTRICT COURT

/ Court convened at 10 O'Clock or
Thursday, February II, with Judge
Hart presiding and disposed of the
following matters:
/. In the matter of the estate of Alex.
| ander Mcneil. Upon request oi
| Fannie NJ Waggoner, order entered
naming firm of Waggoner & Wag-
oner as counsel in the above matter
Court then proceeded to trial OF
an action in divorce entitled Alexan-
4 der M. Grimes VS. Mary II. Grimes
Clark ]. Guild, attorney for plaintiff
Case presented alleging extreme cruel
| ty. After hearing testimony the
court granted the decree of divorce
| Next matter heard was an action
in divorce entitled Marion E. Heron
VS.. Mercer b Heron Fannie NJ
| Waggoner appeared for plaintiff
After hearing testimony decree grant
3 X .
Also ordered that plaintiff be auth
orized to resume her maiden name Of
| Mary E. Empy.
Friday, February 10. court opened
at usual time and the first matter con-
sidered was the motion of plaintiff 5
attorney in the case of Fotherington
VS.. p Dominica asking that the sup
Elemental answer fled by the defend
ants attorney, be stricken from the
files and the case set for trial. The
matter was heard in Chambers, and
was argued pro and con. Fannie M.
Waggoner, counsel for plaintiff. and
J. Andrew Cutlery, for defendant
After hearing the arguments Judge
Hart took the matter under advise
mcnt and later ruled that the motion
be granted as to the striking from
the files of the supplemental answer,
and it was so ordered. The case
was not set down for trial, however
This Is very interesting and in a
way. very important case. as it is
brought to determine the ownership
of an automobile which has passed
through many hands before reaching
Yerington, under circumstances in
volving many features, the legal
status and effect of which have here
totore been judicially determined.
only to very limited extent
The court then took up the
matter of the demurrer to the answer
filed in the case of c.. Scateni vs.
Maray Mathews Freitas, ct al. Fan
ME NJ. Waggoner appearing in sup.
port of demurrer. After argument
court overruled demurrer and pro-
ceeded to hearing of demurrer in the
case of Zoe Clark, plaintiff VS.. c. G.
Turner and II Karuspe, defendants,
Clark ]. Guild appeared for defendants.
and demurred to complaint on
grounds OF resajudicata and, other
features appearing therein, and prayed
for dismissal. The court sustained
the demurrer and entered its order
granting plaintiff Is days in which to
file amended complaint.
In the matter of the application OF
the Nevada Mining Reduction and
Power Company, corporation, for
dissolution, Attorney Clark ]. Guild
appearing in support of application.
After due consideration of said matter.
it was by the court ordered, adjudged
and decreed that said corporation be
dissolved as prayed for.
1t was then that the case of Ken
wood Wyers VS. Jesse Christensen be
set for trial on March 2Z 1921, a4 10
O'Clock A. NJ, and That he cas, ol
Wyers VS.. Jesse Chri. teNsen be Sc;
for March p, at 10 M, to follow
the case ABOVE mentioned.
The case of J. b. Gallagher KS.
n. II. Warren was then set for
trial on March %, at 10 a. m. Court
then declared recess until March
y, 10 o'clock a. IN.