The Washington herald., 1921-05-27
Attys. Evans

Carl VS. Carl. Attys, Evans
Yeatman.
s Digs vs. Digss. Attys. Peyton
Heath.
Friedman VS. Marine. Attys.
Gusack-Newmyer.
Barghausen VS. Barghausen.
Attys, Macdonald & Patterson
Smith.
9 Marshall VS. Mercer. Attys.
Stewart & Brown-Houston.
10 Schlemmer VS. Miller. Attys,
Blair-Laskey.
IL In re adoption Of Donald B.
Massey. Atty. Raum.
IL In re estate of Julia Tracey.
Attys. Downing-Patterson
l3 Ruggles VS. Slater. Attys, Du-
vail & Gardner-Dow.
IL Grimm VS. Simmons. Attys.
Jaynes-King & Peyser.
Is Carroll vs Carroll. Atty,
Splain.
Is Can VS. Gaf. Attys. PaIadini-
Shreve.
II wood VS. Wood. Attys, BeaIl
d Turnage.
Is Jackson VS. Jackson. Atty.
Frey.
10 Brooks VS. Brooks. Attys.
Richardson-Emers jr.
20 Freeman VS. Freeman. Atty.
Block.
81 Bergen vs. Bergen. Attys.
Wood-Kennedy.
% Maxwell VS. Hammond. Atty.
Townsend.
2s Inlay VS. PralL Attys. onutt
20 Remsberg VS. Remsberg. Atty.
Quinn.
Is Marshall VS. Marshall. Attys.
Beall & Turnage-oShea. Hawken
& Havell
Minor & Galley & Rowland-Leckie.
Cox. Sherrier & johnson.
| 81 London and Lancashire Indem-
nifty company VS. Young. Attys'
David & Pack-Offutt & Inlay.
2s Grinder VS. Grinder. Attys,
Rhoade-Wolf.
% National Savings and Trust
company VS. Fry. Attys. Sullivan
Hoover & johnson.
50 Helbic VS. Jackson. Attys.
Bailey-Dulany, jr.
81 Deviny VS. Frstsntnone. Attys.
Leshy & vandoren-Wtight.
80 Inlay VS. Prsll Attys. ofutt
& INLAY.
1920 Deit. In re Barry and Far
rus. Attys, Stephens & Barse-
Tignor & Calvert, jr., Hewlett
Edwards ct al.
EQUITY DIVISION No. :.
| Prsceedinss.
1904 Nash VS. Nash. Rule re-
turnabIe June 80. 1921. PHI atty, /.
Williamson.
se72s Holt VS. Holt. Decree for
divorce vincuIo matrimonIo.
Attys, Foster, Grossmsn & Hslper
N. c. Turnage.
3ss2s wilkins VS. wilkins. Order
discharging rule. Attys, Jones d
Hubert-walker & Hill.
37s52 warheld VS. Warfeld. Inter
locutory decree for divorce. Attys.
J. II. Myers. l. Taylor.
3S710 Resnicof VS. Mitchell. Or
der approving receivers report.
Attys, Jeffords & Dutton-Darr.
whiteford & Darr.
3S702 Colt VS. Gibson. Order au-
thorizing receiver to disburse funds.
Attys, Minor. Galley & Rowland
r. H. Yeatman.
3s03s Taylor VS. Taylor. Inter-
focutory decree for divorce. Attys,
Heitmuller-B. Emerson.
3S4o4 Stone & Fairfax VS. Tally.
Order confirming sale. Attys for
plff. Richardson & Shreve.
3s033 Pratt VS. McGlue. Decree
substituting trustee. Atty for plff,
]. N. Gardiner.
3s64s Myers VS. Myers. Rule re-
turnable June 10. Attys. d. z.
Clarke-M. F. Maugan.
| 35o39 Shoemaker VS. Shoemaker.
Order authorizing sale. Attys, Lam
bert & Yeatman-Ridout, Moers &
o'Donoghue.
Assignment for Today.
1 In re estate Emma B. Bergman
Atty, Bauman.
2 Sullivan VS. Sullivan. Attys.
Gordon-Combe.
8 Manning VS. Manning. Attys,
Costigan-wampler.
Hunt VS. Burn. Attys, Mouiton
l-Ballinger.s
S Thomas VS. Thomas Attys,
Hawken & Havell for plf.
Anderson VS. Anderson. Atty,
Darlington for plf.
| In re estate Harry A. Orme.
Attys, Hawken & Havell-wright
Eagles VS. Curtis. Attys,
Williamson-Davis & Cobb.
Wentz Co VS. Rue. Attys,
Wheatley-Dow.
10 zisgler VS. ziegler. Atty. More
house for pln.
III Morrison VS. Morrison. Attys.
Hawken a Havell for pif.
~ Frassr VS. Fraser. Attys,
Waisn-oSheA