The Wheeling intelligencer. [volume] (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1903-1961, 1921-10-15

tuc other. They heratc Re!lN!i" oco""So
, h signed a raS" oath and made Il '"'S'
statement il his tcsGm"n! "e'o'e INC
council Investigation. tH'n comes
and tells the truth. lie only ''Ho WIZ
and he told III" truth here "''ore H""
Nrt tho d"fcu&" says NAH Mas AZ ''N y.
and would explain his testimony '\"'
took took tn" oath who" u" server -
an election c,"rk. II" k"r1Hr'H "'"'
;h"u. II" Sw":g falsely before ''' ''""'
ii. investigators. m! r" cam" III "s''
before YOU and /" 'd "iI in'S "''"'eS
! stand. and !ou heard him Il" Il
Here. at tn" motion "s I'll" d"'c"Se
Judyr Robinson directed the jurN |"
disregard Ia. rrtcrcny" I" EeilNiileE
testimony h.t"r" the rouuru inNHSuEa
tors hc,a,i,c It had not b'cu mentioned
, In evidence.
y" r'Sh' ""'""'""" Ne'' '"' Wv.
lie" TWICE 'n't we 1,'" ~ ,''.
because hs'N ne '"'u '''' Nv,
"a ''h>$eo oE 'ne oe'c"Se a. ''' ''he@
liar.
Prosecutor Ea'hnran then went on u
analyze the defense testimony ano
p"n, out its weak points. Coming u
the point where Thompson visited the
Fort Henry hose house the evening OF
the election. the prosecutor said:
"Whv did Thor pSon go there when
the voting was rac;ically over I'll
ts>, Won why he ont His PURPOSE was
a. charlie ReI,ville ha, told YOU. 70 pul,
If, mi. >r.udul.n, tbin, that Rcllyiu.
Void ms nu,,.a NJ,
Az N,,h,,ar ,h., ror, into ., ,onr,hv
o,,a.,. -, -. s.,.ns ,o,,on,ion th,,
-. -, ~. o,, :, rro,.,rc. =.
49, e., ra Ma, .nou, dsc,,ri,,
,.,,. ,,,, ,,., s,,.
r,.i. 80 It,, o,,,u "a cavity
,,o 49,
""'is""' anu '"a' '"e .0"'''' 's'''0 '''
gee" p'0o"'eu !"
Rogers Untold story
Every neck va. craned and ears were
alert when Prosecutor Bachmann en-
,w.red ,he reference, nv Attorney ]. II.
Ritz, 70 the alleged powerful influence
which caused Gland. Rogers TO 20 to
tall rather than testify in tho Thomp-
son trial.
The defense" Rachmann said. had
Claude Rogers, who had been subpoe-
naed by the state. como into court ano
attempted 10 put MN on the s'sno
lhey also got George Seioert 70 'ahe
'ne STAND. Iha'' gentlemen Is 'ne cruz
OF 'h's SITUATION lou nealo GIL ''"'
oe"se ee4oe'' oen''u "'.t WV
'Fo'n '"aG """' |''uoe N0ee'
m'"s "ouiu nav Doen' ~" NV" t'o,"
en' a. ''''' =, 49,
H'se'' ""o'o "'' ~ ".
"eto"Se uiu nv "A"N
so o" 'ne sou a"u ." 49, 49,. ~
wv, 49,. o,,.,
.,o =. 49,. .,a,or,a,. ~ ~. ,-o..cr.
,o- ~. N. court nsrnIttsd Bachmanr
fto 20 an
How did Mr.. conin know what &c
ask George Seibert. THAT'S what
Claude Rogers would have testified. Dc
You know what that testimony would
have meant? It would have contra
dicted Homer CraEo's testimony. The
defense would deceive you and have you
believe that his testimony would clear
Burley Thompson.
couiH IN stirrinS Pa
| .hA ., .,,rr,, a,d .,ocu.n,
-. go ,,ad. 20 a iurx IN m. Grim.
tn., co,rt ~ Ohio county WAS that made
lot. v.,tsrd,v af,srnoon BY Hon, Johr
= con,r .necial counsel with the
.,,t.,, ,ttornsyx for the conviction Of
Fire Chief Thompson or tho charge OF
atdinr. abettinE and counselinE with
| = W, R.lIyills 10 cause a false return
to Be made OF tho vote cast in Precinc'
NO Oh uhe ooeo'o 80
e'ee'ion n''u En~' w. -
oS efon mo
t'm~e ite.u' VI
MF, Conin iIau on
m@steltui eno''' THO w.
couiu ha'e oe'" i""o' "a ''e
no nao 20 "orA on ono .i'"N ''o'
y 'oen''neu wiz" '"e
ized the ADDRESS OF MI 0o"'n
May IL please tne eoui ai'u
mon OF tho jury Mt. Con1i' oee, w.
lowing attorney - n1 - VIZ $50
'''e -'e ',s. -, .hr. IVA 4,
pu'p'se Va ga
"'s ~ 49,. Iii, \,
iNo 90 .h ,..t,, NJ p,,, HI,
,. ,h.t h.,iars
.,. - 49, ,,o-. a,
'A'' .r. .ho, 49,,
9ouF '4iho n' ~,