New Ulm Post. [volume] (New-Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1864-1933, 1921-07-22
WHEREAS, it Mas been made t

WHEREAS, it. has been made to
appear to the satisfaction of the
County Board that q change is de-
|sirable and proper in the route Of
State Road No. 3, as designated and
described in the resolution of the
County Board under date of January
~, 1914, therefore
BE IT RESOLVED, by the sCou,n-
Ity Board Of Brown County, Mime
Isota, that the route of said State
Road Nc. s. be changed and estab-
lished to run from the Northwest
corner of Section No. Thirty-two
1922, Townhip No. One hundred
and eight 108), Range Thirty-four7
$40 south one ~ mile to the south
west corner of Section No. Thirty.
two, Township No. One hundred and
eight (108), Range No. Thirty-four
(34) and there to join and connect.
with the there existing and estab-
lished state road No. Ten (10); and
be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the
portion of the designated State Road
No. 8, under date of January 7th,
1914, extending from the Northwest
corner of Section No. Thirty-two
(32), Township No. One hundred
and eight l08), Range Thirty-four
$40 running thence east three miles
and thence south one mile, be, and
the same is hereby, eliminated from
the route of the said State Road
No. 8, as heretofore designated and
established by the order of this
County Board under date Of January
18th, 1914; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the
foregoing resolution Of this County
Board be submitted to the State
Highway Commission of the State
of Minnesota for its adoption and
approval.
The committee appointed on May
13, 1921 to work in conjunction with
the supervisors of the Town Of Stark
in the matter of the improving the
public Highway Of the Northeast
corner, Section 80 to the Northwest
Corner of Section 80, and from
the Northeast corne of section 80
running west $40 mile to the Lara
bee bridge reporting in writing that
j the improvements planned by the
supervisors have been duly carried
out to completion and finding the
work acceptable do hereby approve
of said construction and they, there
fore, recommend that the 100000
appropriated by the County Board
under date Of May -, 1921, be paid
to said Township. The report was
accepted and the Auditor was in
structed to issue his warrant in the
iamount specified.
The County Auditor submitted an
estimate of the County Expenses for
the ensuing year which read Is fol-
lows:
To The Honorable Board of Co.
Commissioners, Brown County.
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to provisions of law I
hereby certify that the following is
an itemized statement for the county
Expenses for the ensuing year of
1921, viz
For Salaries ----------$35,O 900
Mothers, Pension - 5000
Court Expenses (est) --- 5000
Books, furniture, stationary,
fuel, light and water go 10000
Miscellaneous - $4,000
Total -------- $4,000
County Poor Fund.
Support for relief orders etc. $4,000
Physicians, Medicines etc. $500
Overseer salary --- 1900
Miscellaneous ~ 1000
4 Total -------- $4,000
County Road & Bridge Fund.
Contracts and appropriations
granted to be paid as follows:
j. o. Case, Contractor at
Alvin Bridge. ---$ 1891 90
Town Of Milford (est) 500. 90
Town Of Home (est) - 100000
Town of Lake
Hanska fest) - 10000
Town of Sigel test) $4,000
Town of Stately (est) 100000
Town of Sigel and
Stark (est) 10000
Town of Leavenworth 100000
Town of Mulligan $50 10000
Town of Cottonwood 10000
Town of Eden 1905 90
Town of Stark 2OO.0 90
Town Of Bashaw 10000
Total ------- $16351.0O
+. C.. Koehne, Contractor,
repairs on Hindermann
Bridge -------- $4,000
Anton Brand, Contractor
on Lake Shetek.road in
Town Of Sigel ----- 100000
.@ir baber etne meme. unb
rif6e Ausmabl BON
Il Groceries aAer art
II @rfunbisen sic it6 iiber uniere
Treiie-ie fins ri6ttg!
Strides DIT nno @emiiie
III HAk2 80 TnAA