The Bridgeport times and evening farmer., 1921-11-23
S25,O00 Damages Sought By Post
 Union To Fight
(Continued from Page Oneo

(Continued from Page One.)
 The plaintiff has now, 1t says d d full complement or Workeis. a If accuses the defendants. though, as ne declares. there is no strike or VarIouS offenses usual in labor disputes suciA nicketing with few or large nun bers, ridiculing, threatening, IrlsiilsLi ,la ing. annoying, or int1m1datlns no nIoves or prospective employees or the nIaintiff: such as making false state inents about the plaintiff such as pS threats compelling empHoyes oA nlaintiff to leave town.
 -T1be nlaintiff asserts that it mas no remedy at law. because the deLeho. ants are many because they coulu 5los pay damages if they were aWaius ns and because they are to sucn an eAt tant strangers to the plaintiff that It connot follow and detect them in thelr conduct e mo
 Judge Banks in penalty or e:oo' enioins the defendants as follows:
 JNbarafore by the authority of the State of Connecticut, you, the salo oee fendants and each and every one ol yoII and your agents. servants ana confederates and all other persons 10 whom notice of this injunction snail come are hereby strictly comnanoeo under a penalty of S5,OOO (hVe thou sand dollars) to wholly and absolutely refrain from any of the following
 From combining, agreeing or conspiring together in any manner an t9
  will. trade or business and from ob- structing and interfering with the plaintiff in any way in obtaining ana securing employees to carry on It's work.
 9 From annoying, harrassing, ridiculing, assaulting, following, in ducing or in1portuning the employees or persons seeking employment or the nlafntiff or any of their families or friends for the purpose of inducing said employees to leave their employ ment with the plaintiff or for the pur- pose of inducing prospective en- ployees not to seek employment from the plaintiff.
 8, From picketing in any manner whatsoever the plant or the pla1ntl1r or it's approaches or the streets in the neighborhood of said plant.
 A. From restraining, obstructing, or interfering with or injuring the business of the plaintiff by inducing persons to cease dealing or refrain from dealing in any manner whatso- ever with it.
 D. From making any false, mis- | leading or untrue statements In Wrlt- | ing or verbally.
 6. From the doing of any and all other acts of any kind for the pur- pose of or which will in any way in terfere with, impede, obstruct, annoy, | harrass, or injure the plaintiff in the conduct of it's business and from using | any and all ways, means, and methods of doing any of the aforesaid forbid | den acts either directly or indirectly
 or through. bylaws or orders, direc- | tions or suggestions to committees,
 associates, officers, agents, or others. | and from continuing the aforesaid | conspiracy or any part or aspect there of in force and effect.
 T. From imposing or threatening
 to impose or infiict injury, loss or 1 penalty upon any member of Local l Union No. 252 because such member | wishes to work for plaintiff. | Until the first Tuesday of December 1921, and until this Court shall make | further order in the premises. 1 John J. O'Neil, the well known la ! Dor leader, speaking for the derend l ants. this morning, said: We will n employ the best counsel we can ob- tain and fight this injunction to u