Bisbee daily review., 1921-01-14

been married. and that he had mad, | no investigation concerning her di vOrce. other than to ask if she were divorced. Murry then asked Prodar ovich if he had sworn to a a-cr warrant under the authority of which Miss DavsnpOSt's effects had been 'aken rom the Philadelphia hotel
 t Satter objected to the question and the court sustained the objec tiOl
 Tailor Testifies
 Sutter then took the witness again nd offered in evidence a marriage 'cense that he said had been applis q Ger on Wednesday. January ,. Ths license was admitted in evidence.
 A | StapletOn. a tailor on O. K. street. told of a conversation that he said he had with Miss Davenport in his shop He said that she showed him some clothes and ring. and he asked her where she got them. and she replied that Sam gave them to her. According to Stapleton. Miss Davenport said Prodsnovich gave her the things because he thought she was going to marry him, but that she said she was not going to marry him Stspleton said that he krew Miss Davenport's husband, J. B. Pruett, F years ago in Texas, and that Pruett had been in Bisbee. Sutter then of fered a certified copy e Miss Daven- ports (nee Mrs Pruett) divorce de cree. which was accepted in evidence.
 Mrs. J. Akers. of the Phelps Dodge store, testified that she had fitted a dress to Miss Davenport, and that the latter had told her that she was going to be m3rried on January 11th
 H. D. Navarro testified that he met Miss Davenport at the Philadelphia hotel and was Introduced to her by some friends. He said that Frank Cummings was there and that Cum nings asked Miss Davenport if she was going to marry the bohunk- " According to Navarro, Miss Daven- port said, '-No. but I will get all I can from him so we can get married" The witness testified that Cummings -e7lied. You are not getting enough" a-d that Miss Davenport replied that he shouldn't worry" as she would - Prodanovich to put S100O in the h~nk in her name
 Counsel for the defense then took the witness and said. Navarro. will vou turn and look at the judge; look the judge in the eye"
 Afte- some hesitation Navarro con- 7fe@. During the testimony he had '-s7t his eyes conspicucusly on. the for Counsel for the defense did Tf- qu sticn him further
 Murry Asks Dismissal
 At this point Attorney Murry inter 0ceed 9 motion 10 dismiss the charge - saii that To evidence had been in- . - 7-ced on which the defendan. Ul1 re bound nv'er He declared z. ven conced;ng the truth Of all - ai'e~aci1ns that had been mad -s'nst her. and that she had agreed -, may ProHsnovich. that it had ''co- shown that she had been guilty -a'-'ng any false representation
 fa~- as was areged in tn cor 7'-+ So sur-her d-cis-ed that
 h0 n'a'-tiff who had broken c-
 -'ar aereaT'ent. if such =
 ! a,1 not Miss Davenport
 - S--'fer ~rOse tn resist th
 .--1 Hs branded the defendan-
 @-~D'-e" ''She has simnl
 7f-art1~e If an ignorant n
 he called hin." said Sut te-.
 If you ran find anything but DO -1'so Of marriage that was not ca led out" said Nurrv. addressing th coslrf "rnd that was h-oken off b. 'i-a -lsintiff. you are wiser than ~--~n As uotter of fact, the plain --rf ms done ro'hi-s but-with eve-~ .iiu- ;n his fa~or-aftenrDt tn use .'is court as a collection agency for .ha -eccre-v of that which he ga-- away"
 Jnsticr Craig announced that ~-ould give a decision at l o'clock to, day.