Baraboo weekly news. [volume] (Baraboo, Wis.) 1912-197?, 1921-05-19
Young Man and Young Woman,
Former Pupils in Same School,
Have Difficulties
HE WAS A SOLDIER In
THE RECENT WORLD WAR
Another Soldier Who Had Lived
In Home For a Long Time Sues
for Wages---Other Cases

The case of the State of Wisconsin
against Justin Davis is a peculiar one.
Mr.. Davis and Miss Catherine McCabe
knew each other when pupils in the
Reedsburg schools They were not
close friends, just had an acquaintance
He went to the war and when he re-
turned called Miss Cabe on the teie-
phone and wished toosee her. This
was refused. Later he met her on the
street and they walked part way to her
home together. On the way she stop
ped at a house and asked to be taken
home in a car, supposedly to get away
from Mr.. Davis. About the time she
arrived home in the car he had reach
ed the same point in his walk and ad-
ditional conversation was held. She
claimed he had made remarks that
should not have been made and the
same evening there was more or less
telephoning between the Davis and
McCabe families over the matter. The
young man finally went to the place
of business of the young lady's father
in order to clear up matters and this
resulted in a fight. Later the young
man was arrested and placed under
bonds of $4,000 to keep the peace. Not
being able to give bond he was depriv-
later the bond was reduced to $1,000.
Then he was able to find bail and was
released, The present action was to.
clear away the bond and IN that way
dispose Of the matter. Miss McCabe
and relatives fought the case but the
court decided there was no cause for
continuing the peace bond and it was
set aside.
The witnesses: Catherine McCabe,
Mrs. James McCabe, John E. McCabe,
J. R. Davis, Eugenia Davis, Justin
Davis, Ed. Voyette.
Sues For Wages
The court will prepare findings in
the case of Carl Blueml against Louis
Schulz.
When about ten years old the plain
tiff entered the home of the defend
ant and remained there until the war
came on, then entered the service.
While on the farm he had been treat
ed as other members of the family,
given money and clothes, also permit
ted to earn money. Mr.. Schulz had
permitted him to take part of saw
ing machine outfit to work on other
farms and had allowed him the use
of the farm team to work on the road.
The returned soldier sued for 5000
and his attorney asked that this be
increased to $1,000. This was denied.
Although findings will be prepared the
court will not likely allow any of the
amount asked for.
The witnesses: Louis Schulz, Carl
Blueml John Zoebel, William Brum-
hoefer, William Schulz, H. B. Quimby,
Joseph Huntley, Ernest Siefert, A. L.
Thomas, John Huntley, George Hor-
kan
Other Cases
The order was denied in the case
of Francis E. Byrne against Harry H.
Thomas.
The case Of Henry Klipp VS.. F'ict-
tious Coleman and others was to quiet
a title. Herman LIGHT was a witness.
There was judgment for the plain
tiff in the case Of Theodore Schluter
against Earl Henry.
The matter of wages in the case Of
Frank Musich against George Roehrig
and others was taken under advise
ment
Title was quieted in the case OF
August Steinhorst against Charles f.
Legate and others; the same action
was taken in the case Of Joseph
Rurland; the case of John A. Hatz
and others against John Accola and
others; Jesse Reel against David Mum
son and others; and Wilda Prouty
against Anthony Young. The witness
es in the several cases were August
Steinhorst, Casper Roser, John Hatz,
Lydia North and Wilda Prouty.
In relation to the will of Henry Har-
ris, deceased, there was an order OF
dismissal with costs.
Cc,,r+ +bap adiofrnod