The Wheeling intelligencer. [volume] (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1903-1961, 1921-04-30
BY MARK SULLIVAN.
au"nal roliti"t Cores p"nd"n' 81 '"
IuI"j!Icrnrrr aud New York I've
ming Post

IuI"j!rrrnrrr aud New York Eve
Ming Post.
WaSh;ugtrI. April %0.--A rising tide
OC discussion about Z, u""'~!un hbEdru
down by M Supreme Court Last w""h
a.'S hr";.Shi tuat decision /" Il i"int
where !: engages the attention 81 con-
Siirut."mal lawyers and publ" men
NOR" fully than any subject ~ M"
r.,,i<ation Your correspondent = a>
Surrd thai tn" discussion WIZ quickly
spread throughout the country.
E";h those who like the decision an.
tho-.. WAC dislike il in;rscIy agree thti
It's Importance is extreme. NrplT"H -
I waS only hrcauS" Of accidental cir
rumstances that the decision fn:icd 20
make at the moment i WAS haniri
d"wu tho sensation which many serious
lawyers say It will make a. soon ~
the lawyers. Judges. editors and other
commentators II Ia" country Ar" aware
o. the direct present effects on IN" Com
StitutIon and is implications ~ 70 the
fu,urc.
The assertion tina; 'hc "rfe-'t o: tho
decision on the Constitution If tn"
United States j. sensational does not
rest merely on the constitutions. lawyers
here in Washington who arc now saying
it, Grounds I" Justify their d"Scrip-
ton Of il a. sensational mr." t" b" i""nd
i" tn" words III On" OF IN" court l'S"It.
Justice McKcnna. who was strongly "N-
posed I" tho decision nlan" ny inc m" ,
'J"r!ty OF IN" court ana VII" II"
down the dissenting OPINION, III I'M. us
N'"'.nS "'''"'"" ''''" ''"'' "''
words OF alarm AZ me ele'l ~ lN' "''F
son on IN" SAh'''iF o. INC ""H'''"''"
ana lis Implications for IN" future
That JuS'i"" M"k"nna was deeply
moved Is r"hdiiF I" Il" seen from an IN
ANIMATION or ms ~orH> S''eF' i''''
students "i IN" C"nH'!'lf'oH' WE" are
now diS'uSSlhE the ""''~'"h' Say ''''' ,
ranks IN tundamcn'hi inhP"rN'n'" WIN
any decision ever hanorn '""n ny '"'
supreme '"ur' anu 'na' - '"'' - ="
tHH h"Ar' "i 'I''' '"''S,''" t'""' ~ N''''"
In IN" h"Sinn'ng NJ" as ,af-r'a'"i"G rs
Guy ~ ''' '""'' ''''0' '''''o'
H'c'si"nS
fhe Aen' "S"" SHSes'
Stated as simply as possible and w''h
4 due warning 10 me rcau'r OF 'n'
limitations involved IN giving mere rN-
'T"' = from "e''N'"" N"u iN'"''''' '-
INK ks spirit 'ht cas-. ""S ''''H'
Congress during INC war i'>Hfn II
-" applying 10 Ine D'slrI|' ~ I"'u"'
OLA known as the rent Jaw >'"''i
roughly II PToFuen 'hat Ia"''"'u
cannot get ms properly o"eN 'i"''' q
tenant ~ IN" 'oi "l MS ''aS" u t,'c
tenant Is Wiling |" 20 on Pa!ihS 'n'
sam" rent, similar II" was pASS'
by New York state aPlllcap'c |" NJ"
1ork CITY
Inc laws WERE o"' 'ouElS CO"
inc MOI ''"4 S"it0'i'S VI 1o",' t 90 - Wv
ever th'E were pass" an" many ',''
""'H' "'" ,' NV ioIN an ~
'"Ht""' '"oN q" "i''S VI
""'''""' u, N""H ''0>e' ~ 'ie ~"
COURTS th' LAWS were qu'cNIS uec'ult''
""|o'''' '"''''"'' :"
I"o 81 tue S".,H one i'''l Nv" ~
ana one from ash'nSto"' WE'RE "''''"
ana carried up 10 Tue supreme '"ui =
II - 'n' "''S'"N ~ '''e'' Wv" N'''
"Hich - h'" u'S'i'0'" d. ~ '''"
t!ohAl'
IHiS PleHeHt ieNt9''' ny 'I'' '"'' 10,
court uPh"'"S the Id" an" "'''''9 CIV
TIC i'Iu''E" CdhI'ot 'J'y' "'' u"''''' -
the termination OF tHe tease the roI!'
was dlNid"d on INES OF I'VE 10 '"U''
The justices who DECIDED IN FAVOR Il
the raw are folmeS' Day ll'h'E'
Brand"iS. and Clark. the decision beng
These 'Hclud" the Justices WI" are
>coinm"nIy reSaraeu us more SHHP"