Richmond daily register. (Richmond, Madison County, Ky.) 1917-1978, 1921-03-26
IRVINE CLAIM
Continued from Pas

all descendants and heirs-at-law
of Sarah I. White, and defendant
says that the correct name of the
said descendant first named as
such heir at-law in said plaintiff S
petition is d. Irvine White, ST..
and that in addition to the said
descendants and heirs named, Jas.
c.. -Greenway is a descendant of
the said Sarah L. White, and that
all of said descendants of the said
Sarah |. White are also all and
the only heirs-at-law of the said
David Irvine. the father of the
said Elizabeth S. Irvine, and the
said Sarah [. White.
This defendant is informed and
believes and from such informa-
ton and belief admits the truth Of
the statement of the said plaintiff,
that the said defendant, d. Irvine
White. Sr., and his sisters. Sarah
Med. White and Shelby w. Wal
ker. are asserting that Elizabeth
S. Irvine disposed OF a large
amount of property which was
devised to her by her fathers will
and that they are asserting, that
she failed to reinVest the pro
ceeds according to the terms of
his will and that they are assert
ing that the written agreement
between the heirs Of David Ir-
vine, to-wit his fbur children, did
not and could not vest her, the
said Elizabeth S. Irvine, with the
right to dispose Of Said property
as she chose, and that they are
asserting that BY reason of her
failure to reinvest the proceeds Of
her sale Of such property, the
-at-law of David Irvine. who
are also the heirs-at-laW of Sarah
I. White, have a large claim as
the heirs-a t-law of David Irvine
against the estate of his, the said
petitioners alleged testatrix and
said defendant admits that if such
an alleged claim exists Or is made
the same would constitute a cloud
upon the title of the estate Of
plaintiff alleged testatrix and
defendant admits that until such
claim is judicially determined the
plaintiff cannot with safety. dis-l
the personal estate of his
testatrix without first dis
r. !, q rcr,,,rr o. ri c1oi
Further answering said plain
tif's 5, petition at said Paragraph 2,
this defendant says, said defend
ants, d. Irvine White, Sr., Shelby
w. Walker, Susan Med. White,
the only living children Of said
Sarah |. White, and the said five
living children of Alice w. Green
way, a deceased child of Sarah l. |
and the said seven living
children of the said Bette WI
Patton, a deceased child of said
Sarah I. White, all fifteen of
whom are or should be defend
ants herein, and all fifteen Of
whom are not only the heirs-at-
aw of said Sarah I. White, but
llso are all and the only heirs-at:-
aw of said David Irvine, who
lied in 1872, and that he is in
formed and believes and from
ueh information and belief states
he fact to be that the claim of
III of said heirs of David Irvine as
UGH against the estate of Eliza
'eth S. Irvine, for an amount
within reason of the proceeds re-
eived by the said Elizabeth S.
irvine from the sale or sales OIL
ny property she received from
Ter father under his said will, isl ;
valid claim, if and when dulyt7
made and proved,of just indebt-
dness against the estate of the /,
aid Elizabeth S. Irvine, for byte
he allegations of said plaintiffs
etition herein, the said David Ir-lt
inc left the property devised byi
i'm to Elizabeth S. Irvine, to her e
or her life only, with remainder i
i fee to those designated by him {
5 the children or descendants of I
children of the said Elizabeth ST.
ryine. that might be living at ]
II ishfff54 Ssss Z 81