Richmond times-dispatch. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1914-current, 1921-04-04
sTAUNTON WILL CASE
READS LIKE movie"
"'ch'noni Realty Figures in Liti-
CATION That VIII BE Decided
by Local Court.

Special 10 The Times Dispatch.J
HIAtNTON. VA. April 3-During
ne past several days. attorneys have
""eh taking dispositions from wit
n"fscs mere In a viii ease that. ia
some OF itS features. rivals scenarios
ahh diin" novels. The estate in
NoiNch ls not large, being valued. mt
ABOUT {lO.oVc. ana consists chiefly OF
some Isich:nond real estate. II the
nahccry Court OF Richmond which
my Jurisdic'ion In the suit. and
which Is expected 10 decide /, the
latter part Of this month rules for
INC plaintiffs. ohio people. who never
hh"" the t-St:Ito- concerned. VIII
'"l ~, INTO the property.
ne Styl" ut the case IL Mary l.
Bnzcl Enos Franklin hazel. ct als.
vs. u. W. RHwtcs IN his own right
ana - administrator az Ellen G..
""i.s' and as executor 81 Elizabeth
ann bazci al ale IL tho plaintiffs
Mi II is set forth that james Raw e.
ai"d IN Richmond Oh No. cinhcr 90,
I'VE: without issue. leaving VIII
with his widow. Ellen (. RnwlCs.
who. b"!orc marriage, vas Ellen -
Ha~o! Of Augusta Count. as soIc
beneficiary on july :. lbll. ~ IN"
AZ" Of 81, she died Interstate. and mr.
u w. Raw!cs. Of no hin or coHu"c-
ton. Whatever! qualified az adminis-
traitor % her estate
pied In Hichn,nnd Ia iniG.
- is set forth by the plaintiff 'hat
thc next Of Kin and person who. an
der tn" Virginia code. are entitled TO
The estate. were Elizabeth Ann Baz"l.
~ years az age. who died In Rich
moHd IA lJi., SISTER who resided
With tho interstate Ellen &. i:a. los.
ana the children o: n dead brother.
Frank nazcl said 10 hav. died In
Onto on January %. 1893. his Gull
irrr, MarS EaZel Giilnuph, Anna Il
lAtil". John Bazcl. and tn" lattcr's
children. Mary T.. i:az"l Euos Franz
I'm t.l.,sl Mrs lgEs.i. 60 In,
in. Tia, plaintiffs.
AIRS John L oConucil az this
city. served "a lh". link which con-
prove their FAIRY godmethef. II tn,
sUii ~ decided iu their favor
Wh"n Et2abcth Ann Eaaei The
s,cou! 81 IA" NO dS"d ssi"t ana
4 mnidcu lady. d..i ir Richmond,
fhc ,'hAEvcry court Of that city. IN
which he war n1n'i sole beneficiary
ana executor. y" ire. ;uuSlE as adj
Tor H. cU - Hawles. hav-
iI-r w ncI, u ~ represented. half uu-
der tho Virginia law should have
sor" 90 Tho children OF tho alleged
Ma. lie nicy Grdm"thrr.
AIse I1hn II 6'CorueU OF Stauu-
ton was fyi"ud oi Tie Bazel sisters.
ari i,s'ii!es ttat She had heard them
peak "t ph'p relatives
'.' s'Hh'f " q ~t4'r '4.t dil.'l ifilr SA-S
zion OF q photograph Of one OF the
. AL family who. She thought. was
~ iE" pato branch. tn photog-
,aphc,', nam" and city address Was
on ID. picture. hut she was unable
10 gct iato touch Win rho subject
% ms camera through him so she
'r'oIn ne puf'mlSi"r ui The city He
nGN.s"u new PAPER advertisements.
80 'iipuch such = medium f'r.:ik
bJE'! or descendants ot Frank Ba%e!
were 1E!t'd so communicate Win Mrs.
'N'orr.il, an" al promising That they
"'Iii learn something to their ad
vantage.
rac news paper ad trough, results,
tad snru hc children. through tn"
80 ilrm Ct Byrd & GwasHnicy. OF
u 'Inrud. witu I'ior'dus : CROSBY.
+~ stanton legal adviser instituted
.lracr cGiUSs 10 ohid'u what J." claimed
y" Dc tNci" ShHre OF thc Hazel estate.
y f'5 wiuliN "a the hands Of Dr.
i;Iw.cs thcir hill Sots fortl.
Two luuscs. known as 1904 East
I'D SNcct aud 1919 i'leasau;
: "".i Richmond. cons,itutc IN,
nl'r involved
'i'.s .pr cary. of Richmond and
". ~ i'"ytOn. or ;taUntoi., are
t.' 'tvftHdau'S counsel.