Richmond times-dispatch. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1914-current, 1921-07-10
HANDFUL BEAR TAX
BURDENS OF MANY

Continued From First Paec.)
Sixth Streets, s?35.7l0. total of s3,-
olo,36l.
Assessed real estate valuation for
1920 for the cities OF Bucna Vista and
Amelia. AppomattoX. Bland. BuckinE
ham, Charles City. Carroll. Craig.
Cumberland. Essex. Floyd. Fluvanna.
Franklin. Gloucester, Greene, Giles.
Gruyson. Highland, James City, King
George, King and Queen, King Will
liam, Lee. Lancaster. Matthews. Mid
dicscX. northumberland. New Kent,
Powhatap, Patrick. Rappahannock.
Spotsylvanla, Surry. Scott stafford.
Wcstmore!aud and York. did not
equal the assessment placed against
the six Richmond institutions above
mentioned. according to the statistics
OF the Virginia Association for the
Common Good.
Total Assessed Values.
Tota! assessed values. 1920, all re-
sources, OF eighteen counties and one
city. did not equal the assessment
levied against, and paid by, the six
Richmond institutions. The city was
Bucna Vista. and the counties were
Bland, Carroll. Craig. Cumberland,
Essex. Fluvanna. Floyd. Grayson,
Greene. James City. King George.
King and Queen, Mathews. MiddlcscN,
New Kent. Powhatan, Stafford and
Wcstmorcland.
Following is n reorganization OF
statements OF assessed taxable values
OF Virginia property for the year
1920. complied by Statistician T. w.
workman. OF the Virginia Associa-
tion for the Common Good, and sent
to tho several units OF the associa-
tion in the various congressional dis
tricts. showing what part OF the
States total of Sl,62i,ol6.oSs. is
borne by each:
First District-sl36,249.l70. or SO
per cent OF entire state. Frcdcricks-
burg. SO per cent OF First District;
40 per cent of entire state. Newport
News. 3i.T per cent of Firs; District;
% per cent or entire state.
Second Distrlct-s2oO .06S SOL, or us
per cent of entire state. Suffolk. g
of rcr cent Of entire state: 81 per
cent OF Second District. Portsmouth.
% ncr cent OF entire state; l2.5 per
cent of Second District Norfolk.
l0l per cent Of entire state; SOC per
cent of Second District.
Third Distric'-SS3523 7.35G. or eos
pcr cent OF entire state. Richmond.
500 per cent Of Third District; l6.""
per cent Of entire state. Williams
burg i.4G per cent OF Third District;
IS OF | per cent. ,of entire state.
Fourth pistrIct. .Sl3o,s9G. or
per cent Of entire state. Pctcrshurc,
a2S per cent Of Fourth District; 90
pcr cent OF entire state
Fifth pistrict--sllS.93i, $50. or IS
per cent Of entire state. panvillc, 50
per cent Of I'ifth District; % per cent
OF entire State.
Sixth Distr!ct-s17i900.Sl9, or 10.7
per cen, Of entire State. LYNCH urg.
s451 per cent of Sixth District; 81
per cent Of entire state. Radford city,
sl9 per cent Of sixth District; . of
per cent Of entire State. Roanoke
city. n per cent OF sixth District;
80 per cent Of entire state.
Seventh Observation-Disclosures. or
6.S7 per cent OF entire state Char
lo,tcsvile, l0.5 per cent OF Seventh
District = of ! per cent OF entire
State Harrisonburg. 6 per cent OF
Seventh District 4 OF per cent of
entire state Winchester. 9.27 per
cent Of seventh District; 6 OF per
cent Of entire state
Eighth Observation-Disclosures or
s.67 per cent OF entire state. Alex
endria 1896 per cent o! Eighth Dis
tric,. 50 al / per cent OF entire state.
Ninth District SOL ,G95.9sI, or G.25
per cent o! entire state. Bristol, "a
of per cent of entire state. per
cent OF Ninth District
Tenth Observation-Disclosures or 7l5
per cent OF yu'. state Huena Vista.
II Of u,y cent of crtlr. state. :.