The daily morning oasis. [volume] (Nogales, Ariz.) 1917-1920, 1920-07-18
COUNSEL ARE ACCUSED OF FRAUD
AND COLLISION. WHICH ALLEGA-
T|ONS ARE SUSTAINED BY
JUDGMENT OF The COURT

sidergte, loyal and faithful wife to
her husband, 4 and that
her said attorneys lad ample proof
that aid defendant and cross COM
plainant had committed adultery
with said Sara Goldher and with
othel women unknown to affiant
during said absence of affiant and
ner sons while they were visiting in
Russia"
e. +, her said attorneys
made no effort Whatever TO present
said evidence to the court at said
trial; that at the time of said trial
ffiant begged and entreated her
said attorneys to present her defence
to her said husband cross com
plant, and her own claim to
separate mainteance. but that her
said attorneys wilfmly and wrong
FULLY neglected so to do. ="
"* she was convinced
that hey had deliberately tricked
and deceived her iind had worked
against her interests and in the in
eres' of her said husband, and that
for these reasons she was discharg-
ng tne attorneys wl.o had so wrong
ed her and was employing other at
:orneys to represent her from that
lay forward"
Acc ompanying the petition of Mrs.
LeekN was an affidavit by her son
tenry Leeker, corrcborating all his
mothers allegations, and testify
ng CT his own knowledge of his
-ather Nathan Leeker and Sara Gold
ner q, cupying an apartment to-
,ether in New York City. Henry
.eekar's affidavit closes with the
following significant assertion:
And that efforts were
made at various times by his said
ather and his fathers attorney,
rank j. Barry Of Nogales, Arizona,
o es;range affiant and his said
brother from their said mother; and
lnduce affiant and his said BROTH
I to desert their said mother in her
me of need and to aid and assist
lelr said father in securing a
Ivorce from their said mother;
lat letters were written by said
dthe" and said attorney with this
I'm and object *"
Ther follows a copy of letter
rom Mr.. Barry, which is much toe
ong to be included entirely, but the
Xcerpts following will give an idea
+ its text and import:
r x
81 never suspected at any time
lat a cloud had settled over the
amlly x +. Later on
bout year or So ago, he fell sick
e was in the hospital under care
# Doctor Smlker, and then it was
first saw Mrs. Goldner; first peo.
lie sad she was relative of his;
'ther. said she was a nurse, anC
inallf people who love to speaH
;cardal, said otrer things. I never
new what sne was to him, and
ever inquired; and l have not in
rui1cd from him even though an
IS lawyer.
II am opposed to divorce on prin
:iple, and it is my boast that I have
never taken the case of a plaintiff
n a divorce suit. am oppose t.
2nything that rends asunder thu
marriage bond. l am opposed t.
anything that breaks up the famil!
circle. x. Well, Mrs. Gold
nor >ame into your fathers life
whether she was a relative, nurse
or wn&t she was | dc not know. A
lour fathers lawye4 I am prepare'
to de, end him against the charg'
that .he was his mistress. AS you
fathers son I believe you shoul
help NE in defence of your father
honor"
"Then came some letters fror
Henri and yourself which were no
calcuilted to smooth away the diff
ficuties that were daily GROWN