Republican farmer., 1920-07-23
SUPREME COURT PASSES ON MANY
 FAIRFIELD CASES

The Supreme Court yesterday de- cided many cases at the sitting in Hartford Many Fairfield county cases were in the batch passed upon.
 The Fairfield county cases were as follows:
 Action of the Bryant Electric Go against Sophie Stein and others in- volving a contract to convey land and in which a demurrer to the com plaint was sustained in Fairfield coun- ty, was remanded with direction to overrule the demurrer. Error was found in an opinion by Judge Beach. All judges concurred.
 No error was found in the case of James Mclaughlin against William G. Shaw, trustee, and others, brought from the Fairfield county superior court by both sides. It was an ac ton to foreclose a mortgage tried be- fore Judge Curtis. Opinion by Judge Wheeler, all concurring.
 In the case of James F. Duff, ad- ministrator, against John Augustus Husted, error was found and a new trial ordered, in an opinion by the court. It is an action to recover damages for causing the death of the plaintiffs intestate by the alleged negligent operation of the defend ants automobile, brought from Fair
 ielu COuHly, where llle pldlHlllL was non-suited in a trial to the jury be- fore Judge Keeler.
 Judge Beach, in an opinion found
 no error in case of Joseph Suga against William R. Haase, IT,, an ac-' tion for damages for personal injur- ies inflicted by an automobile driven
 by the defendant, brought from Fair field county court where Judge Keel CT directed a verdict for the defend ant
 Another opinion by Judge Beach found no error in an action of Chas T.. Lindsay against William R. Phil lips to recover commission for ser vices. This was brought in Fairfield county before Judge Webb and inter-
 1ocutory judgment for an accounting l ordered. The defendant appealed Judge Gager dissented to the opin- ion.
 The case of Walter S. Bowne, IT,, against the Stamford Rolling Mills company and others, appeal from supplemental award of the compensa- ton commissioner taken to the su- perior court in Fairfield county and reserved for the court of errors, was returned with advice to vacate the award. The opinion was by Judge Prentice and all concurred. An opinion by Judge Wheeler, all COncurring5 except Judge Gager, ad- vises the superior court of Fairfield i county regarding the rendering of l judgment in the case of Samuel E. Carter against Harry c. Brownel1 and | others. It is an action to recover
 against Browne1l and for decree against the Westport Bank & Trust l company to pay over the net amount {! of income which would otherwise be | payable to defendant until judgment Lis satisfied.
 This was a case where Mrs. Brow 1 nell at her death made a will Ieav- I ing the income of a $25,000 trust 1 fund to her husband, the defendant so that same shall not be liable for l debts etc., and the opinion holds ! that under the provision the trustee l is given no discretion over the income 1 and the trust is not within the stat l utes.
 l Other decisions included the follow ling:
 omitis vs. Samuel E. Hopkins. No er- TOT.
 Ernest c. Jacobs vs Emma Street l No error.
 l Estate of John Johnson vs. H. M Buqlard company. No error. l State of Connecticut vs. Katherine Reynolds and Julia DiMock. No CT TOT.
 HntaI coranannL No