Abilene weekly reflector. [volume] (Abilene, Kan.) 1888-1935, 1920-01-08

iNAtu iVI StNtidt hti'
also will be taken to the state penal
institutions following this term than
ever before.
| Dismiss MANY Cases.
The following civil cases were
dismissed; Daisy Sinclair VS.. J. T..
Sinclair, for divorce; Katie From
VS.. Fred From. for divorce; Louis
W. Beeler vs.. The Riverside Light
and Power Co. for $4,000 dam
ages Morris q Co., VS.. II. A. Stout
to recover money and Isaac Page
VS.. f. !. Conn. Those settled out
| ty Oil and Gas Co., VS.. Atlas Pc
tr0leum Co. to recover money; Mel
bourne Hicks VS.. Setphen Il. Stark.
foreclosure of mortgage; Oklahoma
Publishing Co. VS.. w. II. Mott. ct al
to recover money. Bert Eye VS..
Denver Alfalfa Milling Co., for arhi-
tration Badger Lumber Co. VS.. w.
II. Dayton, ct al.
DEGREES were granted the plain
tins, quieting titles in the cases OF
Isa Peatling ct al VS.. John Kinney ct
al; John Kracher VS.. ]. b. Anderson
ct al and Martha Bane VS.. u. r. r.
r.. Fred Coulson VS.. John NJ. Fisher
ct al.
In the case OF 4. NJ. Jones VS..
ha Nf
court was for the plaintiff, granting
foreclosure of "A mortgage.
II. w. Beemer was granted SIS
damages against the Atchison TOpe-
ka and Santa Fe railroad The case
was transcript from the justice
court.
In the ease OF Samuel Forerer VS..
| u. G.. Shlpley ct al the sale was
confirmed by the court.
Decree was for the plaintiff.
granting divorce in the case of Flor
ence " Peterson VS.. james IL. Pet
erson.
lFrom Wednesdays Dsily.l
| iJthlIitl fOuIl lNlt uto-
day afternoon, following two busy
days. and Judge II. l.. King and
court stenographer, Guy Sackett, left
on the afternoon train.
Twenty one cases have Deen SET
for trial by jury next week and the
week following. Court will convene
again next Tuesday and two criminal
cases will be included among those
tried. They are the eases OF State
of Kansas VS.. Wait and Sthte Of
Kansas vs. Scott to be tried Jan. Is
and Jan. H.
The others and the dates for trial
follow:
Burdick state Bank vs.. G. Il.
Schlesner to recover money, Jan. 13.
r. w Karl VS.. Emery Il. Baer to
collect commission, Jan. H.
Mayer Pazer VS.. Jacobs, trans
cript, Jan. 13.
The Red Star Milling Co, VS.. O.
r. Shaffer ct NJ. for damages, Jan.
10.
G. w Northcutt VS.. the U. r. rail-
way company for damages Jan. 90
This case was continued from the
September term and Northcutt asks
damages for injuries received in
Solomon in March 1917, while work
ng as brakeman on the road
Il. A. Sumner VS.. the American
Express Co, TO recover money, Jan.
H.
j. H. Brewer Go. VS.. the U. p.
for the recovery OF money,
transcript, Jan. 81. -
George Dunlap, VS.. M. A. Ander-
on, to recover money Jan. 22.
ella z. Hurt VS.. James Haire, to
ecoyer money, Jan. %.
Hughy Nicolay VS.. Paul Nicolay,
0 recover money. Jan. %.
Gus A. Killgren VS.. KnKights and
aides Of eScurity, to recover money,
an. 2S.
O. w. Brown VS.. ]. II. Sommer, to
ecoyer money, Jan. 27.
Hughy Holt vs. V. o. Bowersox, to
ecover money, Jan. %.
w. +. Neeley vs. Santa Fe railway
ompany for damages suffered as the
esult OF his barns burning last fall
,ill be tried Jan. % He alleges
park from freight train was re-
ponsible for the fire.
Leonard g. Burton VS.. Lysander
I. Bardwell. quiet title. Jan. 30.
Seaton VS.. Bngle, a controversy
yer hedge fence and tree that
le defendant is alleged TO have cut
own. Jan. 23.
John Vahsholtz ct al VS.. VIM. Finn
t al for cancellation of lease, Jan.
3.
Sarah A. Noel ct al VS. Mary Noel,
,r partition Of real estate, Jan. 10,
Reflector Publicity Did 1t.
Henry Iambreth sold his property