Eagle River review. [volume] (Eagle River, Wis.) 1890-1927, 1920-02-06

few, and the most of the people were standing
Democrats and Republicans were packed into
solid mass together goodnaturedly talking and
chatting each other Upon the stage were seated
prominent of both parties A chairman and
secretary, and time keepers who had previously
been agreed upon, were early in their seats, but
made no effort to restrain the great crowd until
after the speakers had arrived and received the
deafening applause of their followers
1t curious sight when the contestants
assembled to their places on the platform-Lin-
coin tall and Douglas so short Lincoln
so angular and Douglas so sturdy, Lincoln so
spare and Douglas so compact and rotund. They
alternated in opening and closing the debates
the opening speaker an hour, his competitor fol-
lowing with hour and half, and the opening
speaker closing with half hour
And the whole country realized the Importance
Of this local Illinois contest. 1t was understood
that this not so much a contest of men as Of
principles. From the beginning all semblance of
local personal struggle vanished. The eyes of
the nation were the two champions. Every
newspaper detailed their speech and action. Every
speech was published in full. Men on either side
made the arguments Of their champion their own.
1t "Old Abe" and "The Little Giant over
again at every crossroads. Illinois was the po-
litical and moral battle ground of the nation.
And at Freeport Lincoln made it plain that he
stood ready to sacrifice the senatorship in order
to advance the anti-slavery cause. At the Ottawa
debate six days before Douglas had asked seven
questions as to Lincoln's attitude toward the va
rious phases of slavery and its management. At
Freeport Lincoln answered these seven questions
frankly. He confessed his repugnance to slavery
but said he did not believe in immediate drastic
action to abolish it. He opposed it's extension.
He declared it the duty of congress to pro-,
hibit slavery in the territories. And then he put
in turn four questions to Douglas, of which the
second was the momentous question with the far
reaching results.
Lincoln put this question to Douglas against the
frantic protests of his friends and political adj
visers. They told him it would cause his defeat
and would lose him the senatorshp. And Lin
coins reply was this:
Gentlemen, am killing larger game If Doug
las answers, he can never be president, and the
battle of 186O.is worth hundred of this"
Lincoln, as history has shown, was 100 per
cent patriot and American It is no disparage-
ment to add that no shrewder politician ever ran
for Office. To appreciate the shrewdness Of this
particular move a glance at previous events is
necessary
The historic Missouri Compromise" act of 1920
prohibited slavery IN the territories north Of SO
degrees, thirty minutes, latitude. This was re-
pealed and congress substituted for it Douglas
Kansas Nebraska act of 1854. This empowered
the people of the territories to determine for them
selves whether not they should have slavery.
Then came the sDred Scott decision" of the
United States Supreme court in 1857. This held
that congress has exceeded its authority in the
passage Of the Missouri Compromise act that
slaves were property, and that the owners Of
slaves had the right to take this property into
the territories and hold it there like any other
property, no matter what the wishes of the people
of the territory in question. This decision was
the direct opposite of the doctrine of Douglas
Kansas Nebraska act. The decision meant that
slavery could exist in Kansas whether the Kansas
: people were or were not willing. Moreover it
opened the door wide for the extension Of slavery
to the West and North
When Lincoln ended his single term in congress
in March of 1849 he practically gave up politics
and devoted himself to his law practice The
passage of the Kansas-Nebraska act in 1854