Emmons County record. [volume] (Williamsport, D.T. [i.e. N.D.]) 1884-current, 1920-08-05

all sec. 33; hf NV or sec. "a; NV or
NV or sec. "a; all in Twp. 1876,
20Oa; indemnity 100; fiat sc tax,
So 10, total S33. ID.
c. S. Lowell N hf NV or; Sc or NV
Or; sw or ne or sec 10-132-74; indem-
nifty, $1,000.
Upon motion the following applica-
tons for corrections in the hail tax
were rejected:
Michael Burgard, hf NV or sec.
IL & sw or sec 2-131-77, 16Oa.
c. 7. Bartsl, n hf hf Of sec. 10
1865, $50 acres; a error in descrip-
ton.
C. c.. Mills, ne or of Sec. 1875
70, 80 acres; a c error in description.
Jacob G. Fuhrer, sec 31-129-74 ne or;
sec. 32-129-74 ne or; sec 33-l29-74.
NV or, 240 acres, a error in descrip-
ton.
Upon motion the board adjourne,.
for the remainder of the forenoon for
the purpose of reviewing roads in
township 1871, range II, to reconvenc
at 2 o'clock p. m.
AFTERNOON SESSION
2 o'clock p. m. July 9, 1920.
The board met pursuant to adjourn
ment. All members present.
Pursuant to advertisements for bios
on grading to the bridge located be-
tween sections 81 and 35-131-77, such
bids were opened and found to be as
follows: r.
John Bader and sons, at as cents
per yard.
A. Diamond, at 4S cents per yarc
John Bartu, at SO cents per yard
1t was moved by McConvilla an,
seconded by duHeaume that Jchn Ba-
der and sons be awarded the contra 4,
as per advertisements and his bid
Upon roll call all members voted aye.
The application of T. A. MiIun, fo>
refundment of the 1919 tax, amount
ing to $19.95 which was assessed
against him as graf MAX, was upon
motion granted for the reason that
the tax should have been assessed or
charged against the Occident Elevator
Company.
The application of Myrtle G. Wood
land for reduction in the 1919 valua-
ton placed on the Sc or Sc or sec 10,
and n hf and ne q: of NV or OF sec.
24-136-79 and refundmenc CT the
1919 tax in the amount of $26. 20 was
upon motion granted, and the asses
sed valuation placed at $500, for tine
reason that large portion of the
land has been taken by the IMissourl
river.
The application CT Joseph Weisbeck
for reduction of the 1919 assessed
valuation on the ne or hi sw or, W
hf Sc or of sec. 2s-13O-75, was upon
motion rejected for the reason that
the board considered the valuation OF
$6451 just valuation.
The following application were up
on motion approved as presented:
R. B. Payne, for a reduction in
the 1919 valuation on the W hf ne
or sec. 32-129-77 from 1880 to 5000,
for the reason that the 80 acres was
evidently valued the same as 100
acres, and that it was an excessive
valuation.
Jacob Walther for reduction in
the 1919 valuation of the Sc or NV or
and lots 3, and in section 6-l31-77,
from $4224 to $500 for the reason tina,
the land was assessed unreasonably
high.
Adam Berreth for a reduction in the
1919 valuation of the hf of section
25-132 70 from $4474 to $326s, for
the reason of excessive valuation.
w. W. .Dougherty for reduction
of the 1919 valuation on the sw or of
section 22-135-77 from $432O to $4,000
for reason of excessive valuation COM
pared with land of comparative value.
F. A. Gossman for reduction of
the 1919 valuation on the sw hf NV
or, sec. % and Sc or ne or section
Continued on Page Seven)