The Jewish monitor. (Fort Worth-Dallas, Tex.) 191?-1921, 1920-04-09
CITATION BY PUBLICATION.

The State OF Texas, In the District Court
Tarrant County, Texas, June Term. A.
d. 1920.
To the Sheriff Of any Constable of Tar
You are hereby commanded, That, by
making publication OF this Citation In
some newspaper published In the county
OF Tarrant four weeks previous to the re-
turn day hereof, you summon G. +. Bish-
op and the Unknown Heirs Of c. F. Bishop
whose residence are unknown, to be and
appeal before the District Court. to be
holden in and for the County OF Tarrant,
at the Court House thereof. In the City OF
Fort Worth, on the first Monday In June
A. d. 1920, the same being the It'll day OF
said month, then and there to answer the
petition OF Mrs. c. +. Bishop as plaintiff,
filed In said Court on the LIST day Of April
A. d. 1920, against c. F. Bishop, and the
Unknown Heirs Of G. +. Bishop as defend
ants, said suit being numbered 5233S. the
nature Of which demand Is as follows. to-
witt
Plaintiff sues defendants for the title
and possession OF Lots 3 and 4. OF Block
IL, third filing OF Riverside Addition to
Fort Worth, In Tarrant County, Texas.
and alleges that she Is the owner In fee OF
said property, and that she claims the lots
and the premises under deeds duly re-
corded In deed records OF Tarrant County,
Texas, and has had peaceable and contin-
uance possession OF the same, using the
same and paying taxes thereon for per-
Tod OF more than ten years before the NJ
ing OF this petition, to-wit since 1908.
That plaintiff Is holding the title to said
property under deed from The East Fort
Worth Town Company to c. +: Bishop.
and that the property was decided to G. r.
Bishop. In trust for herself. and under an
unbroken chain Of title from the State OF
Texas: That the defendants, G. i. Bishop,
and the unknown heirs OF G. +. Bishop
have n illegal title to said property, but
are claiming an interest In said property
under and by virtue OF said deed from
the East Fort Worth Town Company to
C. +. Bishop, but that the said deed was
executed In favor Of c. +. Bishop for the
use and benefit, and was the separate
property OF this PLAINTIFF; She further
claims title under the 3, 5. and 10 year
Statute OF Limitation; She further claims
F. Bishop to her self. and executed per-
manent and valuable improvements there
on In good faith and the benefit OF said
Gift; and that she purchased the same
with her own separate monesy. Same
coming primarily from the estate Of her
that c. F. Bishop and the Unknown Heirs
OF c. +. Bishop have no rightful interest
in and to the little to said property.
Plaintiff prays that citation Issue In
terms OF law, citing. C.. +: Bishop and the
Unknown heirs OF c. +. Bishop to appear
and answer herein. and on final hearing
she have Judgment for title and posses
sion OF said property, and that title In full
TO her be given and the cloud upon her
title be removed and for such other and
further relief In law and equity as she
NAV show her self justly entitled 70.
Herein Fail Not, but have YOU then and
there before said Court, this Writ with
your return thereon showing how you
have executed the same.
Witness. Mrs. q. Frank Coffey, Clerk OF
~ "a ~ To nj
Given under my hand and seal OF said
Court in Fort Worth. this LIST day Of April
A. ID. 1920.
(SeaD MRS. @. FRANK COFFEY,
Clerk District Court, Tarrant County,
Texas. BY @. s. Williams, Deputy.