Tombstone epitaph., 1920-03-07
MONDAY

After two jurors. who had been ehsllanged by the defense last Fri.
 gay. had been expelled from the pan. ei this afternoon. the panel was again completed by two more tales
 men qualifying after 23 men remain. ing on the list of available jurors had been examined. The first to suaify ~as W. F. kines of Cour,land being the 21st man examined, while fhe last to qualify was the last man left on the panel. L. A. Smith, of Tombstone.
 When court opened the defense called H. w. Reed. a rent car drive. of Douglas. who swore that he took Bruce Stephenson to the Bearan ranch. Mir. Stephenson is the man who vas arrested for perjury Satur- day after he swore he visited the home of Mir. and Mrs w. H. Beaton in the Sulphur Spring Valley, Taylor Frush. a farmer residing near the Beatons swore that Stephenson had come 10 his ranch and he accompan- jed him as far as the Beaton gate.
 The defense then called Lynn Haymore to the stand in its effor. 10 impeaeh. the juror P C. Haynie. Of Douglas Haymore swore that Haynie had said to him in 1917 if he was a young man he would take a sack Of beans and go to Mexico 10 the mountain before he would go to war. and on another case while discussing religion in the L. D. s. church in Douglas had said it was wrong for men to commit murder, that only the wicked kill each other. He said in answer to a question frora the state that he had come up U held get Haynie off the jury because he understood the court did not want any men who were dislcyal or who were under suspicion to si; on the jury. In answer to why he did not repor, it while the war was on. he stated he did not consider it impor- iant enough as far as MT. Hayne was concerned with the war.
 The defense then called Harry l.. 1 Foster a miner Of Bisbee. who swore l that E. H. Mannus, the other juror 1 whom the defense was trying to i'm ] peach, had stated to him that the de- | portation was wrong. When asked !. by the state whether he had partici- ! pated in the deportation he declined 1 to state after the court had instruct ed him as to his rights.
 Willard Huish returned soldier. I, from France, who had been wounded I in the left lung and is now attending I the University of Arizona under the government vocation act and he | swore 10 practically what Lynn Hay more had said, adding that he had taken exception to Haynies statement End told him what he thought of i,. On cross questioning by the state, the court severely reprimanded At ;orney Geo. Roarke when he asked Huish if he. had waited to be drag ged into the army by the neck and had not volunteered. The defense strongly obiscted and the court ad- monished the attorney for the state ty saying that it made no difference whether a soldier volunteered or was drafted they all did their duty and ae ked Mir. Roarke to refrain from sach future utteranees.
 ?. C. Haynie. the juror was then Ju- on the stand and when question eG ty the state said that owen Huish 70 testified against him last Thurs day was angry al him because he had notified his daughter. wife of Huishi that If Huish did not come out Of Mexico and support her she should euit him and come and live with her father. Haynie also testified to n1ving bough over $500 in liberty bcnIs and contributed to the Rel C--ss and other war charity organ izaEo=s.
 The s:ate called Hal Smith, de puty sheriff who testified that hc s,h2oaenaed Mir. and Mrs. Beaton at