Arizona republican., 1920-04-11
FORGOTTEN FAMILY
 IF THE DRAGONS IS F AGAIN RECALLED

LONDON, April 10.-A daughter of MT. Edward Parker Deacon, the Boston millionaire. and sister of the Princess Radziwill, wno was formerly Miss Dor othy Parker Deacon, was the plaintiff several days since in libel suit against Messrs- H. R. Baines & Co., Ltd, pro prletors of the Daily Graphic, which was mentioned to the Lord Chief Jus tice in the Kings Bench Division as having been settled.
 The plaintiff was Miss Gladys Deacon. of Tells Cottage. Chemin d. Fabron, Nice. and she complained that the defendants published in the Dails Graphic of last New Years Day the following statement:
 s'The Deacon family have had more than their share of romance. Gladys d sister of the Princess, was the center of great >outcry in Germany in which her name and that of the ex-Crown Prince were so frequently coupled that she was banished from the country
 Sir Ellis Hume Williams, K. C., M. P, who appeared for Miss Deacon, inti- mated that the defendants had con- sented to pay her s2500 damages and an agreed sum for costs, and judgment was entered accordingly He added that in January last the Daily Graphic commented upon some matrimonial ] dispute existing between the Prince and Princess Radziwill and into that state ment, without warranty of any sort. they dragged the name of the plaintiff. The assertion about the plaintiff and the ex-Crown Prince was absolutely without foundation, said counsel. It was not even a case in which exaggera- ton could be built upon some sub stratum of face. It was pure malicious invention.
 Before the war this lady was in Eng land, staying with the Duke and Ouch ess of Marlborough at Blenheirn, and there she met the then Crown Prince The plaintiff was a school girl at the time The visit lasted three or four days. After she left Blenheim she re- turned to school at Bonn. She never saw the Crown Prince again. She never communicated with him, she knew nothing Of him except that which all the world and humanity condemned
 Until the defendants published this paragraph about her supposed associa- ton with the Crown Prince, she had never heard of or from him. Under those circumstances, it was a very cruel thing to write upon a young un married girl just at the dawn of her social life. On the 3rd of March the proprietors of the journal published this apology:
 es1n our issue of 1st January last, q paragraph was published regarding the matrimonial differences between Prince Antoine Radziwill and his wife, who was before her marriage Miss Dorothy Parker Deacon. At the end of that paragraph we published a statement that the Princesss sister, Miss Gladys Deacon, was the center of a great out cry in Germany, in which her name and that of the ex-Crown Prince were so frequently coupled that she was ban ished from the country. We have now ascertained that there was no founda- ton whatsoever for this sta tement, and we desire to withdraw it and to express our regret, and to offer Miss Gladly Deacon our deep apology for the an noyance which she has been thereby caused.'
 NIT. Eustace Hills, K C., repeated on behalf of the defendants the absolute withdrawal of the libel and the ex- pression of their sincere regret
 His Lordship: Very well, there viii be Judgment for the plaintiff for s2,50c on the terms agreed between the parties.