The Dolores star., 1920-09-03

real estate scheme fostered by LImon
and Flngier, the proposed new county
seats. =. That the legislature has
twice refused to create these new coun-
ties and the matter should be left to
that body. ). That it would impover-
ish both the new and the old counties
through burdens of taxation in main
tanning five county governments where
three now exist: and would lead to
many other attempts at county division
all over the state
Educational Amendment.
A proposed Constitutional Amend
ment providing thar the General AS
sembly mny authorize an additional
levy not 10 exceed ! mill for support
and betterment of State Educational
institutions. The present limit for all
state purposes is 1 mills.
Arguments for: |. That the cost of
conducting schools and colleges has in
creased from 100 to 800 percent in the
last five years. =. That the number Of
students has increased from 80 to 100
I'' WI III iiiiV' yrdiS. lnhl Dct-
ter salaries must be paid to hold
teachers and professors. 4. That more
buildings and equipment must be pro-
vided II Colorado is to hold her educa-
tional standards among the states.
3. That the legislature will control the
appropriation and that 40 of mill
will be sufficient for considerable time
to come.
Arguments against: l. That it will
| increase state taxes. 2. That enough
is being spent on education at the pres
ent time
For Durable Insane.
An initiated bill appropriatng $780,
600 for state hospital and laboratory
for the curnble insane, to be located at
Denver.
Arguments for: !. That many are
sent to the Pueblo asylum who might
be cured If in separate institution.
>. That such durable cases are made
worse instead of better by mingling
| with the incurnble. 3. That various
forms of mental disorders are durable
| il properly treated. A. That there. is
no place in the Pueblo institution for
these cases which are steadily in
creasing and should be treated nearer
the center of pOulution.
Arguments against: l. The money
which Is involved in erecting a new
institution. =. That it would be better
to be part or section OF the state in
stitutiOn at Pueblo for administrative
reasons. 3. That such cases would be
better lnken care of through the insti-
tutiOns which already exist. 4. That
the patients may be subject to inquisi-
torial clinics.
Additional County Judge.
A constitutional amendment submit
ted by the Legislature which provides
that more than one county judge may
be elected where required. The pres
cnt law limits one county judge to each
county. This is submitted at the re-
quest of Denver county where the
heavy work is said to require the serv-
ices of more than one county judge.
"Good Roads" Amendment.
| Submitted by the Legislature and
in bonds of the State of Colorado for
road purposes. OF this not exceeding
$2,O0O,OOO, are to be dated June, 1921,
and not to exceed $4,000, 900 to be dated
June |. 1922.
| Arguments for: |. That permanent
improved highways add to the value
of all property within radius of many
4, l.;
| highways make close connections pos
Sible between the producer and the
consumer. p That many visitors MAX
1 ing large expenditures come into a
state with good highways f. That
permanent construction is cheaper in
the long run than constant repairs.
!. That the payment of principal
would be ST. arranged as to fall lightly
upon the average taxpayer.
Arguments against: l. That the
time is not yet ripe for such Il large
expenditure .. That smaller sums
would be better spent annually than
to go in debt
Salaries Amendment
The third amendment to the ConSti-
| lutiou proposes the following increases
in salaries for State Officers: Govern
or from $1,000 to $4,000; Judges of
the Supreme Court from $1,000 to ST.
800 and Judges of the District Court
from $1,000 to $500
Arguments for: |. That the present
salaries of these officers were fixed 10
years ago when living was one-half
what ii is now. >. That payment
should be commensurate with the dig
nifty and responsibility of the office.
,. That judges of the courts should be
given salaries, equivalent at least to
the average income of members OF the
bar. who are qualified to hold such po-
Sitions.
| Arguments against: l. That the
honor of the office makes the matter
of salary II secondary consideration.
- That these officials are already re-