Richmond times-dispatch. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1914-current, 1920-11-05
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT
COURT OF APPEALS
Federal Tribunal Hands Down
Number Of Opinions--Cases
81 Argued and in Call. .

The United States Circuit Court of APP
2 reals rcconvened yesterday morning at IL
o'clock, with the following judges In at
tendance: Circuit judges-Martin A
knarp. OF Washington, u. c.; Charles A.
!, Woods, OF Marion. S. c.
: Court announced and handed down H.
- opinion in tho follow cases:
Il, NJ. Blythe, appellant. Minnie i
: Goodr and her husband J. ~ Goudc. Alma
q. Turner and her husband w. L. Turner.
arpeiices. appeal from the District Court
ut Grccnyil!s. $. {. Opinion By judy,
smith. Affirmed.
. United States Directos-Generai OF Rail
roads. plaintiff In error, vs.. Annie V
Bishop, ADMINISTRATIVE of 7. N. Bishop
deceased. defendant in error; error tn the
DistTic, cour; At Norfolk. ooinion b,
Judge Woods Affirmed.
Johnston Manufacturing Company. plain
lin in error, VS.. Wilson Thread Company,
defendant in error; error TO the Distric,
Court At GcenviiIe, s. {. Opinion by Judge
Woods Reversed.
1. l. Harley and Torrance y. Harley.
plaintiffs in error. VS.. The United states
The cosrs al e sr,St rfrss
Ntnhi"n ~ Judge knapp. Alarmed.
ana y. {. sens.:i'., pirtner s- doing aSsi
ness unusr TIE style and nrm name oi
.,osepn r. MrebicS, Jonn ~ nuii aad W.
y. taren. Partners doing BUSINESS under
thoPeuic Company, appeilces: appeal from
inc bis>rlct Court at Cumberland. Mary
iirmed.
!, mor.smou,h Fisheries Company. appel
Is Woa M.shlnfsen: y. {. Opinion Sy Judge
on hfssr pnng In s!5s5 VS. North
fShs.,sstoa. ": Va, Opinion Opinion BY 'ot Judss
Henry d. I.ybrand nla,p,;U I, ,-,o. a.,
The United staies q America, deieniant
g op lhs p Ss ssrs Sps5s AZ
Affirmed '>"'p'
!, fsopies Navigation Company. Inc. w.
: Toxsy anu a ID. ,MsTI nn' trading 4. x. +:
NStlSf an Opinion l1p Ss
Judge Woods. Affirmed '' "
peliant vs. il T. Hin,on. =, an anni,n ap
hS ns d,,, irom the District Court al Eiza.
.1tirnHnSS y. e opinion by Judge Smith.
Co. James T. Fox. claimant and respondent
:loseph NJ Ozark and ' SfSah anpei nansss II
D!stsic; C co ui; anpeiHiees; appeal from the
ln sE,,oa knsspn, , Atnlmsd "'A o''"''" by
WHITES WHITES Iced! Reed: plaintin in error. VS. j.
ii nnr, me western District OF South Caro-.
irict Court al r IN srfHr; srrcr TO he Dis
judge Knapp. ca Msse, 1,;.
49, w. J.. whi,churst. piaintin in GIRO, vs
The United States OF America, dcfen:Iun;
NSIi,ppF' error To The District Cour; M
". Z Hudgins.. piaiutin in error. w. Tho
lnlteu states of America, defendant in
TT rror' error TO the District Court III Nor
A. y Jones. piain,ln in error, w. Tho
umiLeo states OF America defendant in
TrIcF: error to the District Court nj Sor.
,o'S Sases argued together by James
,a,,: Martin and Thomas Ii. Wilcox, Of Nor
3p ok. Tor the ?lainuns In error, ana Nv
!i!:ain NJ; Smith. of Richmond, Tor the do
'ehuaLt In error. and submitted
Nh "wSnru - B!ydon, appellant. vs Big
r I'm Coal Company. of IVES. Vi.Einia q
pry;uE cor poratc. appellee: appeal from Tho
IL n.St It Court at Baltimore. Md Nrrncd
~ ituEh Mardcr, OF Grafton. w Va. and
a M - sloan, OF Cu'nherland; Md. for the
m. m, ,oseph Addison, OF Baltimore. Nil Tor
alhe appellee. and submitted " 80 +''
Case In Call To-day
frank s Marley and Ravyo,a ~ WI,
naihs. copar;ners in business undr- ~,
firm name Of Independent pnivctIscu N Inc
tnr company. plaintiffs In error, VS. Pc
yer =. Erunson. defendant In error: crrnr
70 pc argued by whaley. narnwcIi :.
nrinbail. OF Charleston, s G.. rnr ,h ~
E'Hihin In error. and by Iiacooh Rivnrs
aosns; OF Charleston. IS. C.. Tor The de-
-, l. sloan. OF Cumberland. Md ,,,
:1sepn Addison, OF Baltirnore' Md vnr,
, "ui,ai.tna To- p'actice as attorneys ana
l' o'clock '''' '""Fhins at