The Miller press. [volume] (Miller, S.D.) 190?-current, 1920-06-10
Shall Chaos or Reconstruction in
Europe Follow the Great
World War;
ANALYSIS OF SOVIET RULE
Cold Reasoning Easily Proves FaIlacy
on Which the Idea Is Based
D~emagogism Its Foundation
Stone.
Article XXI.
BY FRANK %coMEREoRp.

BY FRANK cOMERFoRD.
Lenine mas frequently observed that
representative government Is a fall
ure. He has insisted that the demo-
cratic form of government is de-
bauched and destroyed by the political
machine; that political corruption We
toes the will OF the people. Ii Lenine
is right in this conclusion, then the
bolshevik government i'm Russia offers
just from three to five times as much
chance for political corruption as our
own form of government. If it is dam
gerous for the American people to
entrust their business to an agent
whom they directly elect and who is
directly responsible TO them, how
much more dangerous must 1t be to
turn over the public business to II
committee. the members Of which
have been appointed by an All-Russian
congress, which All-Russian congress
is elected by soviets for whom the
people did not voter Applying this
plan to our own government, our con-
gress would be elected by the state
legislatures and the aldermen of the
cities, then this congress so elected
would pick an executive committee of
200, and this committee would elect
II commissioners to whom would be
given the supreme power Of the state,
both legislative and executive power,
the right to make laws, and the au-
thority to enforce the laws.
Democracy or Autocracy7
All down through history W the
cries Of government have been at war.
One is that the majority shall rule
the other, that the minority shall rule.
The people struggling for freedom
have battled for the former; the few
seeking special privileges have fought
for the latter. The first is democrat
&c, the second autocratic. No compro-
mise is possible; there is no middle
ground. These two ~antagonistic ideas
have nothing in common like parallel
lines, they can never meet, In their
nature they are separate n apart.
The government of the late kaiser of
Germany, the government Of Nicholas,
the autocrat of Russia, were founded
on the idea that the minority shall
rule. History shows that minority
rule has always enslaved the major
ity. The rule Of a minority over a
majority means slavery for the many.
1t is human nature. The principle
always works the same result. If 1t
is a political meeting and the minor
fly runs It, the result is a machine
and q boss. When it is a nation, you
have a bureaucracy and a dictator, de-
irving his power not from the consent
of the governed, but from the bay
onets Of the army. There may be room
for honest differences of opinion be-
tween honest men On many questions,
but there is not any room for differ
ence of opinion among honest free
men on the proposition that minority
rule Is a menace.
In Article III of the %bolshevik con-
s~titution we find incontrovertible evil
dence that the government of soviet
Russia Is built on the tyrant's stone,
minority rule. Section % reads:
"The All-Russian congress is COM
posed of representatives of city sovi-
cts in the ratio of one delegate for
every $4,000 voters, and of represent
atiyes of the soyiets of the provinces In
the ratio of one delegate for every
125,000 inhabitants"
Discrimination Against Peasants.
No explanation is given fol- basing
the representation in congress from
the cities on the number of voters,
while the representation in congress
from the provinces is based on the
number of inhabitants. The words are
not synonyms, a voter is an inllabit-
ant Of certain age and possessing GER
anyone who lives in the province. re-
CARELESS of age or qualifications. II
the word inhabitant is given the same
meaning that the word voter Is given,
Their it is apparent that the constitu-
ton ~unjustly discriminates against
the poor peasant" AS they have had
no general elections In Russia, 1t is
impossible to give the official construc-
tion Of these two words. If the word
inhabitant means any man, woman or
child living In the province. the dis
elimination against the poor peas
Z ants" is just as obvious, although II
does not go to the same length. AS
an illustration. IL we read this i'm
portant provision of the constitution
giving to the word inhabitant the same
meaning as we give to the word voter.
then we see that the voters Of the
city have one congressman for every
$4,000, while the poor peasants
have one congressman for every 1885,
600. II we sonstrue the word voter
10 mean the qualified legal voter. and
the word int-abitant to mean any hu-
man being rving In the provinces. we
learn that the people Of the city have
one congressman for every $4,000
yot, rs, white the people OF the prov
inces have u congressman for every
81, 800 VOTERS. i reach this estimate
~ the follswins manner: In the United
100