The Bridgeport times and evening farmer., 1920-07-21
SUPREME COURT PASSES ON MANY
 FAIRFIELD CASES

The Supreme Court yesterday de- Hartford Many Fairfield county cases were in the batch passed upon.
 The Fairfield county cases were as follows:
 Action of the Bryant Electric Go against Sophie Stein and others in volving a contract to convey land and in which demurrer to the com plaint was sustained in Fairfield coun- ,ty, was remanded with direction to overrule the demurrer. Error was found in an opinion by Judge Beach. All judges concurred.
 No error was found in the case of James Mclaughlin against William G. Shaw, trustee, and others, brought from the Fairfield county superior court by both sides. It was an &C., ton to forec1ose a mortgage tried be- fore Judge Curtis. Opinion by Judge Wheeler, all concurring.
 In the case of James F. Duff, ad- ministrator, against John Augustus Husted, error was found and a new trial ordered, in an opinion by the court. It is an action to recover damages for causing the death of the plaintiffs intestate by the alleged negligent operation of the defend ants automobile, brought from Fair field county, where the plaintiff was non-suited in trial to the jury be- fore Judge Keeler.
 Judge Beach, in an opinion found no error in case of Joseph Suga against William R. Haase, Jr, an &C., ton for damages for personal injur- ies inflicted by an automob driven by the defendant, brought from Fair field county court where Judge Keel CT directed verdict for the defend ant.
 Another opinion by Judge Beach | found no error in an action of Chas. T. Lindsay against William R. Phil lips to recover commission for ser vices. This was brought in Fairfield county before Judge Webb and inter- 1ocutory judgment for an accounting ordered. The defendant appealed Judge Gager dissented to the opin- ion.
 The case of Walter s. Bowne, Jr. against the Stamford Rolling Mills company and others, an appeal from supplemental award of the compensa l ton commissioner taken to the su perior court in Fairfield county anG reserved for the court of errors, wa: ! returned with advice to vacate ths l award. The opinion was by Judge 1 Prentice and all concurred. 1 An opinion by Judge Wheeler, al concurring except Judge Gager, ad vises the superior court of Fairfield 1 county regarding the rendering O l judgment in the case of Samuel B | Carter against Harry c. Brownell ant | others It is an action to recove against Brownell and for deere l against the Westport Bank & Trus 1 company to pay over the net amour of income which would otherwise b payable to defendant until judgmen I is satisfied.
 1 nell at her death made a will leav ing the income of a $25,000 trus l fund to her husband, the defendant l so that same shall not be liable fo
 debts, etc., and the opinion hold that under the provision the truste is given no discretion over the incom
 and the trust is not within the stat l utes.
 Other decisions included the follow ling:
 New Haven county: Donainick Ad TOT.
 i Ernest c. Jacobs vs. Emma Street No error.
 Estate of John Johnson vs H. M Bullard company. No error.
 State of Connecticut vs. Katherin Reynolds and Julia D.Mock. No CT TOT.
 Margaret G. Walker vs. New Have Hotel company. No error.
 Connecticut Light and Power com
 pany vs. towns of Oxford and South
 bury No error.
 Edward H. Oasner vs. Isador W lRerik. Error found.
 Nathan Chodes vs. Everett B. C1ar Seed company.
 John Karn vs. Thomas DiLorenzt
 No error.
 Elizabeth S. Twiss vs. John (
 Her'bst. No error.
 !. Fred Diaz vs. Warren Brothers com
 pany. Error found. H. Wood Bruce vs. John A, Ackroye
 Error found.
 Edward B. Kelley, IT,, vs. City (
 Waterbury. Error found.
 l Hartford county: Rose McDonal tvs. Great Atlantic and Pacific Te
 company. No error 7 Hartford Trust com pany vs. Puritan Laundry. No erro
 Litchfield county: State of Connet ticut vs. Calavero Cofpa- No error. , New London county: Daniel F tO'Connor, administrator, vs. Harr 7 Zavaritis. No error.