Amarillo daily news. [volume] (Amarillo, Tex.) 19??-current, 1920-08-05
paie,i,m Mus, De DESTROYED.

Though beaten into the eNitn, itnh'l
lated and dishonord ~ the primary
conventions ~ NAV 1T. hy the Ip"m'
rats 81 Texas Bailey was able IN tn
primary Il saturday a. poll more than
% 600 votes or possibly 80 per cent g
MI votes east IN the primary.
While this Is q much larger number
than ", thought b" would poll. after ill
4 Is not surprising. An analysis II H.
vote will doubtless show that almoe'
very discounted person IN the state
voted for him. aud you know IN thcs'
abnormal and changing da,s there ar
lot ~ pessimlsts. Most every thirst,
nan voted frr Bailey. no, because th,N
lop. Bailey could bring hack liquor 3.
ne we're governor. hut just bccapsr th'y
resent the taking away - liuuor
rhuse who have u in for tn national
administration for any reason. voted
or Bailey. Likely a larg. number 60
'cpuhlicans and ncarrepuhliranS wen
INTO the primary and voted Ter Eallcy
| rot intending 20 vote the democratic
ticket IN November Then. Bailey Ia
1 following that was with him IN 1875
| md the bitter campaigns q that time
| made them his friends for all time just
| or spite u nothing cls..
But. hear In mind that IN the primary
saturday u was a race of Bailey again~'
| h. field ON one side was Bailey. ui
The other we're Neff Thomasun ant
t.ooney-and Bailey got only 30 80
ent ~ the votes cast This means tina
he viii be- defeated In the primary a
August -. Tor the supporters - N'if
rhomasun and is0oney are now face.
~ a common enemy. and one whic.
nus, be- defeated
i n A. a.
| tginablc were Bailey elected guvernu
| { the imperial Lone Star State and q
think II him sitting IN the seat one
, allied by Houston Coke. Roberts. f.o-
and Hugg u almos; saCriiigiuux
The election - Bailey wuuf mea.
he ascendancy - the vicious element
md would b. q blow 10 decanCy nu0
righteousness In state politics. Il woul'
" u backward step that would De- de-
mental 90 the state.
But Bailey viii not h. elected u
vill h. defeated IN the primary 81
NuEiis; - just a. Cclguit was dcfca'
a fOr The ssnats in the Ss-cUnd urtmar
! our wears ago after h. had Jed in N
r luly primary. The good people ~ "a
state Will rs. IN August -. just q
% they did IN 1916 and elect Neff a. the
iid CE..sffsOu.
To nominate bailey would b. % bod
dow % democratic national sgccr-s D
! Nu'enheI for Bailey has been and
bitter Tritic ~ ths national admin
|, 4 ration. and declared last spring that
lad don. nothing h. could endorse tn
utirisms ~ Bailey w. understand ar
sing used IN the north hy the frpuh'
A ans in their campaign. His nuuiuatin
would sdd weight O. th~s- criticism
. md make them more effective IN %
. hands ~ the republicans 4 vote q
Bailey On August - makes " that mur
harder g. elect a democratic nTesid,i
>. next fan
Wei hss Editor FITZGERALD - %
] Fort Worth Record said MAY T.
| gss Bsiieys Moscow. July q h. Wa
fiuo. aud August q should BE- HI :
! Helena" - mote it -'laiuy.e
\ Neaa
\ number ~ Iauers are calling ii
A. ~ ntsonrnsr'-l senatorial race
f., Texas IN 1916 or parallel o. The pre-
.nf gIi-rrratnrial situation ed pui
o. ~ 'hs first primary hy r. plurality
e D. nnn over Guilssf.nr With Hr'sis
ramubaU and a. 7. Henry trailing d
llnd o. tho seo0ud primar1 CuiH're'
sat CUluuitf hr n majority - aruu.
'0e0n. Hllrts bead in NE present p
= NARY uI o. Comparatively small.
j. having uu.isd iusf about enc third
b. vote Thuma-srI ard i.fausF D..
u done toward Nsif Just shat E.uI
ind Campbell al toward hsluug ''
a-rs1n with m. ifufsHfauf d.ffsrrn
that fhs Henry vote 49, attempted
y ~ thruNn O. Gniuulft The prubiliti'
4, vote uhith hnd lefn divided hefwe
Gamfi,sll ard iirouk- went suiidly
leuibefscn - also an emit --as btl