Grand Forks herald. [volume] (Grand Forks, N.D.) 1916-1955, 1920-12-29
J. SMITH,
Finance Commfesioner,

Lee: q. $50 TYSS3s
seconded by Commissioners soistad. that
the resolution Of the COMMITTEES be adopt
ed and their action approved. Carried.
seconded ~ conmissionsr sol sni. ,sthat
resolutions and notice OF election ssHb-
mittinF. the %Pprchase.o Of the Audltorum,s
the earliest opportunity. Carried. ss
.0onmunity Mub. n RI .s5
Mr.; !: 3, Wine.aau addressed the
board, stating that he represented the
COMMUNITY. Club, which orEanizationih had
all! civic bodies for the comrnunityrWei-
fare. that at. their last. meeting COM.
plant had been made withAsreference 70
e cong e hnsn ii soa pSols :f hasis ana and Y9s a.ssd;
that strict compliance with laws. relative
thereto as we'll az. curfew law be strictly
Snfoseed; That this appearnnce should
the nature of offering corporation.
Moved. by Commissioner westeen, Sec
tondsd. yscoInlnissienes solstads that this
er Smith Carried. d, Z
Lateral Sever no. B. Dist. no. 10.
The city auditor reported that he had.
n~ottfedsthe owners Of property in Blocks
pear before. the board With reference to
the proposed construction Of! Lateral
Sewer No. s. Dist. No. 10; and that
Ffst aational BANK ssf G n. sts1chissld. nv. w,
G.s Smith, and the F. s. SARGENT Co.
represented by G. w. Ross, asked that
they be recorded az. entering q protest
against any assessment f0r.the construc-
ton of this, lateral. all claiming that
they would have no, benefit from It.
Communication also read from! Fred
er was absolutely necessary to operate
the heating plant II. the Frederick hotel.
and that the ! rates he was now cons
P 2er steam t. pay Vas she pr asa H,ysr hoyss s;
Commissioner Solstad, seconded by Cons,
missioner %Schlabefg, that ~fthesrprotests
and communication be received and fled.
Mr: j.. ID. Bacon one Of the petitioners
this proposed lateralSsewer was CALI
ed upon and stated that the private
Dacotah and Frederick. was out OF coni-
mission and that Mr.. Spriggs the Plumb
er had stated that it would cost approxt-
mat ! y : sS tsmp TO repa rena II " which saco, mould y
thes' lidinE bank Of the river, and the
heavy weight. OF the Foundry property
under Which this, sewer now ran. Com;
and Westeen, all asked Mr.. Bacon II 1t
was not the understanding at the time
he petitioned for. the construction Of
mated that he was willing to pay what
ever. was equattble rs his share Of as
sessmsnt against. his property n, Block
~ W. II. IOWAfU6 INC Cost OHM
No. 10. in conformity to assessments now
being paid. by like property in: Block ~
OFT. 10 which Ne answered that he
would. have to consider what that asBess.
ment YOU be before he could answer
IAN informal meeting was held and all
persons who $wer present and had prop
erty In Block "a 4O.T discussed the proc
posed Improvement. =, fat
President O'Ke4fe again called. the
Board to order and asked City Attorney
Mayer IL: an easement had been received
from the Northern Pacific Railroad ION.
pany. The city attorney reported mono
had been received. 80
.IatsFsl sswsr No.. -, sswsr Dist. Ne. 4.
The city auditor read the assessment
as made by ftohe q assessment commission
and confirmed b. lem and certified ITO
him for the construction Of lateral Eva
mo. ~, Dist No. 4.tNo."41S)SWhlch said
assessment had ben published and no
written protests nled.
Upon consideration Of this assessment
1t was noted that the assessment COM
mission had taken into consideration
former assessments in assessing the
benefits. for thee construction Of this fim-
provement upon the property benefited
and the following assessment was con-
hrmed and approved by the Board $Sof:
Commissioners.
Special u Assessment,
= Assessment charged against lots. parts
OF lots. blocks, parts of blocks n par-
cells OF land for lateral sewer. No. rs in
District No. 4 located in he,. center of
Ninth avenue between Blocks 14eands16i
IN McKelvey's Addition to the City OF