The daily morning oasis. [volume] (Nogales, Ariz.) 1917-1920, 1920-07-18

the cross complaint filed in said ac-
ton by defendant; that beside snd
evidence to establish comp etc de-
fense tC defendants cross complaint
affiart and said attorneys had In
poss,:s sion and subject to their con-
troll evidence to pro e that defendant
had aeen guilty OF adultery, and
that affiant was therefore entitled
To separaUe maintenance and to a
decree denying defeldant's prayer
for j1dgment; that her said at
torneys failed, negle. ted and refus-
ed to make use Of md present SAID
evidence at trial of said action, and
by reason of said wrongful conduct
Of atlantis attorneys, no defense
was 'i.cerposed on Jehalf of afhant
against deendant's cross complaint" :"
X her husband told said
affia 1t that in her absence ne had
formed a friendship with one Sarah
Goldner a woman whom he had res
cued rom a life of shame in Kan
sas CITY, Missouri, whom he was
CONT ~uirg, to protect and befriend;
and her husband demanded that she
:talSe laid Sarah Gcidner pig theiI
home to live with hem and their
children; that wher affiant refused
to colcede to her husbands demands
that laid Sara Gol,iiier live with
them N their home, he told her that
he haI provided a nome for affianl
at No. SO Hamilton Terrace, New
York City, and that he would con
tinue to live with the women he
loved, namely, Sara Goldner."
y =
"That cn or about the 25th day Of
May, 1919 there car e to affiant one
Goldner, iormee husband of Sara
Goldner i * :, that said Gold
ner said he came to help her in any
way he could and that he was ready
TO. testify III her behalf in her legal
proc 1edings againsv her said hus-
band; said Goldner related that af-
fiant'; said husband had on or about
the .nonth of May, 1917, met said
Sara Goldner in house of pros
titution in Kansas City, Missouri,
Which the said Sara Goldner
was then and there 'unnI1g and that
said Nathan Leeker had lived with
said Sara Goldner in a hotel in
Kansas City at that time for sew
cnal days, and that said Leeker had
taken her with him to Chicago,
later to New York City, and then to
Nogales, Arizona, where the pail
had .emained from June 1917 to
June, 1918; that sad Nathan Leek-
er ard Sara Goldner went to New
Yirk from Nogales, Arizona, and
that they have occupied an apart
mept there together, in which Gold
ner himself had stayed for a time
whiln he was on furlough from the
army; that on Goldner's being dis.
charged from military service he re-
turned to New York. where Leekel
and Sara Goldner continued to oc.
cupy the same apartment; and thai
Leeker paid GoldneI to be a party
to collusive divorce suit in which
Sara Godlner was granted a di
vorce"
* X \ **
"* that on the 9th day Of
January, 1920, trial in the above en-
titled cause was held; that her sait
attort eys presentei! no evidence
whatever in ner behalf, and accord
! ing information and belief of af.
fiant they had nevo, changed he
action from one of divorce tt
separate maintenance but had mere
ly dismissed her complaint, leaving
the Issue to be tried that raised b!
! her said husbands cross complaint
! that beside testimony to be securet
from said Goldner her said attor
neys had at her command her tw
sons, Henry and Abraham, who were
ready and willing to testify that af
fiant had always been a kind, con