Tombstone epitaph., 1920-03-14

be settled in court tomorrow, follow ing a decision of Judge Pattee when court convened this afternoon at } o'clock. with the defense ready to start its side of the case.
 Attorney F. E. CurIey, for the de- fense. when court resumed session. h srief statement announced that the time had arrived, one the eve of the beginning of the defense's side | of the case, when t would be neees- sary for them to state the nature of the defense to the jury. as was out lined before the court yesterday. and asked the court whether or not he was prepared to allow it to go before the jury. i County Attorney French immediate Iy entered objection. statins that his contentious would be along similar lines as entered yesterday. and tn. court announced he was ready to hear all the law covering the issue and asked whether attorneys for both sides were ready to be heard. Follow ing a brief conference in chambers. Judge Pattee announced recess wouli be taken until tomorrow morning until 10 o'eloik, in order to give the state time to prepare it's references on the issue, Mr. French having an- nouneed he was not ready at this time.
 Both sides will between now and tomorrow morning prepare their ar suments and references which will be presented to the court for decision or which depends the conduct of the de- ! fense's side of the case, since if tn. court does not allow the admission Of the statement and testimony, Woot- tens attorneys will have to turn to other lines of defense.
 | IL is considered one of the most important issues yet up for settle ,7ent since the present trial started ! MORNING SESSION Coming as bombshell not only 10 court spectators. newspapermcn and followers of the deportation trials 1 but equally as we'll to the defense. was the action Of the state just be- fore noon today in resting their side i of the case in the trial of H. E.. Woo;- ten on trial for Kidnapping. as a re- suit of the deportations from Bis bee on July 1917.
 The announcement for the state i was made by Assistant Counsel A \ Worsley, after the defense had completed examination of Thomas ! G. Greene. states witness, who was on the stand when court adjourned for evening recess last night. Practically the entire morning had been spent in the arguing of a point. which arose over the asking of question by the defense as 10 whether or not Greene was member of tha II. W. w.
 The state objected to this and the first thing this morning. the ju.y was excluded from the court room while for the better part of an hour attorneys for the defense and for ihe state argued it before the court The contention of Attorney F. E.. Curley for the defense was that the I. W. W. issue was 10 arise in the trial O. the case and the defense expected to prove that Greene was a member of that organization. they had right to bring before the court and the jury the foundations and teach ! ings Of the l. W. w. organization, which NIT. Curley quoted al length from I. W. W. papers and to leave il to the jury as to the veracity Of the , witness. if he belonged to the or ganization.
 1 Attorney R. N French. for the state : in argument following that of atto-- neys for the defense argued that at TO time will the l. ~ w issue be entered into the case as far as the state was concerned and if 1t came to | his knowledge that there were any l. w. w witnesses on his side. ne would move to strike their testimony { from the records. He re-iterate!