Norwich bulletin., 1920-01-16

 have been claimed for the trial list of 1 the January additional session of the superior court which is to come in ] here next Tuesday with Judge John W. Banks presiding. The session will run till the 9th of February.
 There are 120 cases claimed on the ! trial list as follows:
 1 Jury Cases Claimed as Privileged.
 ". M. Burdick. ct al. vs. Calvin L.. Swan. Admr.. appeal from probate; l Gertrude $. Selden, ct al, vs Eugene i D. Caulkins, EXT, appeal from pro- l bate; Catherine McAvoy vs. Catharine I c. Shannon, 'Adn.z.; Samuel Belt, ct i al, vs. Jacob Gordon, ct all; Charles s. I Storms, Admr., vs. Walter W. Lang, | ct al, Joseph J. Wrobel, Admr., vs. 1 Frank Blinderman.
 Non Privileged Cases.
 Lizzie F., Chase vs Nancy Chase, John F. Craney vs. John Donovan, Mrs. J. D. Church vs. John Donovan. Joseph D. Harris ys John Donovan, Town of Montville vs. Town of New tLondon, Nathaniel T. Bacon vs Willis Austin, Eliza McClimon ys. James H. i dydeW. A. McClimon vs. James H
 Hyde, A. w. Smith ys. James H. Hyde, Elizabeth Smith vs. James H-aHyde, i Walter Boisse Ys., Israel Fabinovitch, ! Joseph Sullivan vs. William U. Vince l Ter, Elizabeth Ellis vs. Horace H. Main l ct al, Charles M. Geisthardt vs Nor ! wich & Westerly Traction Co.,, Sadie l Nahass vs. Helen Starr, Lucy M 1 Stone vs. Mary L. Ely. Fridia. Attini vs. Albert ". Avery. Carlisle F. Perrin | vs. Joseph Chiaponi, Ernest Rogue vS. Ella M. Burrows, James Duff vs. Si- 1 las MaXson, Isadore Fiedler vs. John | K. Bucklyn, John Finnegan vs John ! k. Bucklyn, Justin Stafford vs. John l K. Bucklyn. James Williamson vs l William Redden, ct al, B. L. Arm i strong,s ct al, ys.lD. T Moran, ct al, Harry Cohen vs. Jacob. Kalmanowitz, l Chas. H. Kenyon vs. George H. Wat son, ct al. C.. NJ. Shay Fertilizer Co. Vs. N. Y, N. Fl. & H. R. Co, John Kes- sler vs. John Sokol, Anna M. Stankie- wicz vs. Michael Zanowitch ct al Mae Richmond vs. City of Norwich, ct al i'Nicolo Christiana vS. Thos. w. Avery l William Redden vs. George .Gilbey. c. s. Raymond, Conservator vs Emma 1 C. Bailey. Mrs. Alice Russell vs. F. D. Eergason, Adel Solar Fs. P. Hall | ShurtS, Linpert Sales Co, Inc, vs Hugh Mcfarland. ct al, B. Cecil Bur gess vs. Peter SeIlas. Hattie w. Daboll Vs. Charles p. Davis Kurt Groepler vs. Sherwood King, ct aL Win. A. Somers, ct al, vs. George o. Stead ct al, Linpert Sales Co.,, Inc, vs. James Vellis, ct all Edward Olaf vs. Arthur ] F. Andrews. J. Olaf, Jr., vs. Arthur E. Andrews, Kenneth E. Hannigan vs. l George o. Vino, Michael J. Murphy vs. H. J. Howard. Roomberg Mfg. co. vs. Uncasville Mfg. O., Margaret NJ. Kendall vs. James Lumsden. ct al, Err nest E,, Rogers, vS. Fisher Florist Inc. Sarah E. Biddes vs Constance At | wood, Pauline Buntman vS. Louis Co., lab, Joseph c. Dorr vs George s. MosEier, Marion F. Edmond vs. Con- stance Atwood. Josephine Etffer vs. William "A. Mercer, Eleanor F'reyer vs. Archibald M. Clarke, ct al, Henry Law vs. Archibald M. Clarke. ct d. B. IT. Rogers vs. Giuseppe Porretta. ct al 10. J. Rogers ys. Giuseppe Porretta. ct al, Augusta Pace vs. City of New London.
 Court Cases Claimed as Privileged. U Josephine Ry6hoIm Simpson vs. So- phio E. Rydholm, Gdn., appeal from Irotate. Debie Nzar vs. John H. Barnes, Adnr. appeal from probate, Olive May Saunders, ct al, 'vs. Will liam c. Saunders, Exr appeal from probate, Mary T. Sullivan vs. City of l New London, appeal from board of re- lief. Flora Miller vs. Olin F. Miller, Julia Litchfield Bullock vs. John Will 1 7OAA 4SeAtlbNNE T IetllCSS 4l CDlCGI bS. JO" sepf E. Spicer, Winifred Price Chad
 wick Fs Charles Chadwick, Ruby A , Marshall Ts. Walter H.. Marshall Lucy L. Euntley vs. Frederick B. Huntley,
 Eulalie H. Swift vs. Henry D. Swift, Mitzel A. Nossell Williams vS. William i Williams, Rose Creenberg vs. Samuel CTeenberg, Lillian S Robertson, AdnlX., vs. Mary R. Woodworth. Or
 rin C. Main vs. Martin w. Main, EXT. 
 ! Non-Privileaed eases.
 i John T. Black vs. City of New Lon don, Marv 4. Coulter vs. Thomas P. Kinney, Charles H. Sattf ys. Giuseppe ] Mondelci, Joseph s. Collins vs. Loyal Protective Insurance Co.,, James Duff ' lvs. C. T. AIaZson, Oscar F. Pend1eton ? Tvs. Moses 4. Pendleton. Frank D. l Strange Vs. Albert Haubt ct aI., Mor- ris, Goldberg vs. Rosie Goldberg. B. H
 Hewitt vs. Pendleton Brothers, Inc,
 Andrew Chadwick .Vs. Ernest Barrett
 ct al D. Elgart vs.. L. B. Dow, Inc Margaret Fitzgerald vs. City of Nor wich, Samuel Belt vs Michael Lub- \ chansky, Michael J. Doyle vs. Ed 3 ward F. Spieer, Michael J. Doyle vs < Moses vs. Frank o. Moses. Lucy 9 Childs Sands vs. John A. Christensen I ct al, Lewis NJ. Young vs Shetucket Y Coal & Wood( Co, WalIingford Manu-
 featuring Co. Tvs. Harry P. Worth l Southern Nenhaden Co. vs. Mantle } I Menhaden Oil. and Guano Co. Ed
 ward H. Capron vs. Charlotte NJ Lamb. ct all. William j. Davidson vs
 las. Davidson, ct al, Richard c. Day
 idson. ct al, vs. James Davidson. [ NJ
 Schall, ct al, vs. Joseph N. Lapointe
 ". SchaH vs. Joseph N Lapointe
 Clara c. Hannon- ct al, ys. Nathar
 Lubchansky, ct al, Louis Lubchansky
 ct al.. vs. Ship Construction 6 Trad
 ing Co.,. Inc, Reuben s. Bartlett. IT.
 vs. Hugh BIackledge. ct al. Albert A 1 Fournier vs. Shetucket Coal Ss Wood
 Co., Mark l.. Gilbert vs. Allen Spoo
 & Printing O., Helen F. Morton vs
 W. Harry Jennings, Joseph Piekar;
 vs. Selectmen of the Town of CoIches
 ter, Leo P. Shandeor vs. W. Harr.
 Jennings Agnes s. Turner vs. Josepl
 Longo. Lillian M. Tyler vs. w Harr,
 Jennings, C. r. Coles vs. City of Ney
 London, Mary Coles ys. City of Nev
 London, Charles Bloomquist vs. Gee
 Dawley, Jr., Pendleton Brothers, Inc
 ys, Ship Construction &s Trading Go
 White ys. Fulton, ct al.