The evening herald. [volume] (Albuquerque, New Mexico) 1914-1922, 1920-01-19
I RULINGS UPHELD
Y AND REVERSED
State Suprrme Court
Passes on Bernalillo
County Cases


nfrtta4 - 49, rsHttn
EANTA E| Ian IHl~in handling
Down Hs rrInipns from six different
ssanIIr4 lht View Mexico supreme
4nft has IN Iauf lN4lAntH affirmed
IAa Judgment 81 ire trial court and
44efrnad and remandra IN the other
two. Tho ftuf fIaes affirmed arc
from nrrHaINIo. EAu1otaf. Lncolr
and rHIunt those reversed are from
&a|fnx md eocprFe.
The ntfnaliiu county suit ~ the
Navajo livestock and Trading CONF
fnh4F. a corporation. appellant rs
she Gallup State bank n fufroratlan.
nHpri1re. "a wae . suit 20 recover
sass rfIH ~ no navajo TradiuH COM
lar1 10 secure me return 1T property
taken ~ ihe bank on demand notes.
Iha am0unt hCinr paid under protest
The routt found D a $3.50 demanded
81 mo hank was o reasonable charge
"a make 4or services rendrred lf
the banks attorney in the proceed
Tugs to ~fufcciase the moftrnfo, that
tGo1 was a necessary expense In
eufred IN taking popeesAion 81 the
property and caring Tor the name;
hat Il vas justly pwinR 10 fte bank
a. the time 81 redemption From:
this undInf o. me court the appeal
was prusorufta. The Judgment - 4 p
DISTRICT ctnrf ~ affirmed. The opfn-
ion d ~ Jueticr HortftA. chief JUS
urF Parker n District Judge Hecu
Honnman concerning. Justice Ray
nejas uab the ftlai sudgo. and there
fhc Iinroln connty chEe y the
TIlfsmnrth company We. Manuel An
ala. II vas q suit % quiet title 20
a certain described real estate. which
involved tax sale crfsiNcaie. q
ment Of the lower court y ~suslained.
The opinion D. ~ Justice Robrts.
Chlf lasilhf rarftf and Justice Ray
holds coufufr7nE.
me aandovai county casc was ono
10 quiet flsIe 70 certain Described real
estate. ID eaa John Mc0nniFie. APP
prAee W the EaEle Te~neite com.
hffIrmfd the Judgment ~ the district
rrurf. Mhlch vas iu favor o. Mceun-
lyle. The opinion b hy Justice
Roberts. Chief Justice Parker and
District Judge Heed Hoiiomnu con
SURFING. Justice Haynoids was the
trial Judge and in this cause also dis
The focorro county case Is one IN
which me sheriff 10 the appellee, and
the tuprome coart reversed the dis
ffIct c1nrI'a Judgment, which WAS N
favor of the sheriff. The suit " re-
aordedi Elfego raca. appellee. ".
John Fleming. appellant was =
MA|| |M| MMMINNAE| q "NNM"AN - - -"
warranty alleged 10 have heen made
upon the purchase BY Aaca q a four
messenger automobile from FLEMING
A Judgement for Wig wns given hy
the court In favor Of Baca. The SD
prome court reversed this judgment
and remknds the cause. with instruc-
lions % sustain The demurrer on the
ernunds stated. The opinion h by
Justice Roberts. Chief Justice Perkcr
and Justice Reynolds c~oncurrinr.
The Colfax county suit - Lenndro
trchuietn. appellee. " Floeraheim
Mcrca Tile company. appellant. This
was an unusually Interesting case, IN
which Arrhnieta sued the company
for tho de~eirurtiun BY fire ~ his prop
crtr. alleging that The company neg
l~lrently failed 70 confine the fire 20
~ own property. hat the fire IN the
company's property was deliberately
started b. fhe company's officers rr
agents 70 destroy the properly 50 as
~ collect tbe Insurance for the less.
The case was tried 20 a jury. which
returned a verdict FOR Archuleta.
assessing his damages ~ the valee
OF his building which was destroyed
hy fire. The supreme court reversed
this Judgment and remands the cause
with Instructions "a proceed further
IN a~rcordance with the opinion. Tho
opinion "a by Justice Roberts. Chief
Justice Parker and Justice Reynolds
coucurrinc.
The Union county suit vas r. ",
Icua4vnll and company. appellant
". n. Hcrzsiein Sec company. APP
peiiee. R~ounavnil and company sued
fhe seed company for $3.50 for al
Legged loas % profits on one carload u
pinto beans. The supreme court sus.
inins the judgment OF the trial court
which "a In favor ~ The HerNstein
Feed company. The opinion is by
Jnaticc Roberts. Chief Justice Parker
and Justice Raynolds concurring.