Abilene weekly reflector. [volume] (Abilene, Kan.) 1888-1935, 1920-09-16
Schlesener W. w. H. Mott with ver-
dict for the plaintin AZ per journal

Schlesener W. W. H. Mott with yer
dict for the plaintiff AZ per journa
entry.
Motion for a new trial In the cast
of Burton vs.. Bardwell was over.
ruled.
Six cases brought by J. e. Brewer
against the U. p. railroad were set
tied for the plaintiff for the follow
ing amounts $5.sS; $26.1O; $3O.23;
$71.62; 1927; $52.9O.
Decree was for plaintiff, granting
divorce In the cases Of Fred From
against Katie From.
The following cases were settled
out Of court Monday:
The Wolf Co. VS.. r. w. Arndt
ct al.
Katie Longhofer VS.. Claude Stone
ct al.
Decree was for plaintiff, quieting
title in the. cases Of T. T.. Riordan
VS.. s. G. Lyon; G. H. Goss VS.. En-
terprise Town Co. ct al; Sarah A.
Henderson VS.. U. P. r. R. Co.; F. G.
Miles VS.. Euphemia M. DUNCAN; H.
Schimming vs.. f. G. Beagle; Floyd
Conn VS.. Sarah L. Selden; Margaret
GOheen VS.. Mary Jane Baxter; Lewis
l.. Fqippo VS.. Frank T. Bagley; John
T. Marts VS.. VIM. r. Brown.
In the case of Estelle Oswald VS..
the Riverside Light, Power and Gas
Co.. twenty days was granted in
which to file an amended petition.
The case is one for damages which
the plaintiff claims she. received
while using an electric sweeper. |
She was burned while using the ma
chine and the petition asserts it was
through the company's negligence in
the wires which caused
the high voltage on the house wires
which resulted in the injury.
The case Of Miller VS.. Seaton was
continued and twenty days granted
for the filing Of a petition.
Partition as per journal entry was
granted in the case Of Emile Eyth
VS.. Carrie F.. F1ack ct al.
Judgment was for the plaintiff for
S516.35 in the case Of Farmers State
Bank Of Hope VS.. Roush Bros.
Judgment for $776.3O was grant
ed J. A. Engler in his case against
John s. Hastings to recover money.
Decree was for the plaintiff for
$3.50 in the case of Chas. w. Belt
eel VS.. David Flemming for the fore
closure Of mortgage.
nj mi
granting divorce in the case Of Anil
la Toliver VS.. L. H. Toliver.
Divorce and custody Of the chill
lren was granted the plaintiff in the
.ase of Maggie Wright VS. Geo. w.
Wright.
In the case Of Clara e. BEEN VS.. \
Tohn r. BEEN divorce and custody
# the children was granted. L
Mabel Pryor was granted a divorce
rom Sterling G.. Pryor and custody
f the child.
In the case of the State Of Kansas |
g. Croft the defendant pleaded gull l
Y and was fined $400 and costs on
he charge Of being party to theft. [
The case Of Engle vs.. Seaton was
ismissed Us were also the cases Of |
he State of Kansas VS.. BEEN and
iggett VS.. Kreech.
In the case Of Rufner VS.. Rufner T
l which the wife was granted a di. {
orce in 1919 and $15 per month t
limony beside attorney fees, the de- t
,ndant was arraigned today for t
Of court for failing to pay n
le alimony. He was found guilty d
nd sentenced to Jail until he paid
lie SIS alimony and $40 Of the at v
,rney's fees. He paid them and 9
as released today. d
In the case Of Hutton vs.. Andre IL
IN, appealed from the justice court Il
le finding was for the plaintiff. a
he appeal was from the payment fl
$114.25 granted by the justicel II
'urt d
The divorce case Of Page VS.. Page
as on trial this afternoon.