Daily Kennebec journal. [microfilm reel] (Augusta, Me.) 1870-1975, 1920-04-15

prSveG Lk1x- A--a-lsg -svaswe1 -Ae
evidence cGE-azrAG n -as 1er-srx
and argaeG -Hz1 the Ccuhis WAS lis
--ea-Esr- Ct Mrs. w. z Sc0E1 To
wards her Gz-E1zar-n-Ekv And
cpZnsei cnE.e--es an the 1a-T thai
Mrs " z Sect was n0l there =
nes1EE, o. Z she were II, -aa1 N
d=pcs1l01s ware rzksr
Tat plal- EzEt SHOW by : PRE-
pCnGs-E1ce Of al L1s EVIDENCE n1'
CZsr that Mrs ScoEss z@ac-A7ls aaS
beer A.4s1z-aHG- bE- had beE- G1sr-
zns6 by Ias eef%-dzz-- LAID WA
hreEgsr EFT by Arzsrrey M-zz-zz-
cz11E Counsel reviewed the sv=nEs
testified - thar he SAC might loek
II aEg EzT SUSPICIOUS or @g.
cEZsS E1sEz- Il thai ce-----1gy
and he rEte-ea % the srZ-e case
srcegAz by the plaintiff e. IN sz-
piczzg expedition" EA showed raz-
we S-E ssss4 had beez are1g-L rs
the pla1--@ against MI and Mrs
C6A. Eac3s and zEn1 Ct Mrs
ScGz-. and ne a-gae6 rAat TIE sEll
against LAaS vas zare.y Al ze1s--
though
b Nzcn zz1en-ic. Eas paid sy,Ar-n--
ney Mcs1-I5CzLay II Is E-y7sz- z
re p4c1-es zs-oouceS :. TIE czss
by rne plaz--1 He referred L
raer- as "a pulp Jos." and ne e.
-sEzznes hcE easily since Lae CeT7Es
picture Industry Aas cone pictures
resembling ary laz o Wuna1 cz1
De posed u aas--S gcsrE-es- e
pointed or that LAdG rad DENIED IL
pictures and TRAIT there was n eT1-
szzce g where re p-cIE-es -s-a.
E-DE
TIE E-oz1sle h,etween Laid and h1'
wlss had nct.azzg ID Do Wiz 1z=-'
eEss. z-1nrney argued In el1sl1g
ne sisted that tire c2sa lookac 2
Ear Xxx : venture I'd ga EoocHy.
Argument Fs- Psas-os@
II MS Argument 11r rha plz------1- Al
ta-oey Elsx1--z z Peacock c. va
---vsls suz-Ad laz- there ware -Ez--e'
elements far -ne <--y = c0nsla=-- -I-'sl
whether -he 2Eac-g-s q Evelyn 7eeI
rad been a1ssnE1RG; secunc : g,
AzE-azr -.a5z. RE Defendant vas u
cazae. and third ne was. men IN
9aes-lor Ct eRrzges w5GlG Arise
A1a-rey Peacock reviewed r. Izsl
r-a-v n LAa ease re3aE1g . Re r--3Ez-1h
tsezwee- L-zac and LIS VS.. ane ne =
gaec rhz- the psTssss- vito WIS I'a= Gazs.
Ct =tlz- Z-2Gols was ETearn scu11 -
lsr-e-s were -svEEa5 hT counsel r.
ztaz=c rza- the defense saEs Il Is "a
--vEhz--.a-Enw WIZ caused the trouble
- --s.--se1 = -a@ r-aache--Iz-ls y = g..
s-al rs E-and-g 9oks and 2rs1s'
reEz tEa1 = pa way sBsU-1 Pre-. 2ElEa
rar 1urv And he sr-s-ney reviewed m
-s.xr4-aany % NJ R-igsz ans the gIaea
evidence -eiz-zE- g ne cEn5 rE-1E
an5 zlsD ire hs-ss owned BY --A1a
WIN was driven - Mrs Set
--ss sz,-u-s;r5rzn II A-a-nRv M--z
ecsGy Laaz he 1lcrE-es were faxed ali
tha-ear -aa E1o 1ouk ne TlG-1Tes VIZ
a5E there l. -AzZzv. was Uksz II =.
A-arnev 1eac0rE VIM. A-s-eE hat e
sn+ Of Re 77ic-u-Hs Il appeared ~
slsea-e vas S-1E 2 -h= Az1d r. 80
z-1a1 oeIug F1otes--zEEsEs.G- and ia ~
Ezs R-ooz -aa- -.e riz.rlE--s=s z-e--s -akH'
- Asnr-z- L.aGd hl--s-iz wml3e BE VIZ
tse-s n cn-zzaHny wItt Ms. Scot All
-e argued -..zs -hs Pictures ware Psse
ay MI Lad6 and Mrs. Sect
IRE r-1a--z- IF damages Was z-EuE!
hy A1-srney Peacock = el1s2g las AT
=zren1 tr ne plaz2-l
1-rge seaas's Charge = Jury
The s=oarRz -a4eE reEz-5zzs he cE-
aen q p-oaf and .;7e weighing Il Zesz
r-G-v we-@ zrT=- ~ 51Gg- 8Eaoe Z
apeE.nE re caa-E= - M TZ-g. =.
pointed Bu1 ina ne evidence snGwEi
thaz TWO +an44es mad been u-1ksn =
n lAe E--le a1zz NJ M E-rnBa and N
rZ-z.rs al Ltose vuEzas peCp3r Destroyed
and -rzI NJ question t1- he JZry z
Gessoe WIS v1o had gene -hz1- sr -aEn
- wt=s oe- - lS- 2 wEs ne 1efez6E1
xaa dc = HI eZ--a+-r rCza-A6 g. Ia
Il Eaz nnz IL element Z -ar n-s1G-G
z@ac1rrE mad aeen 3euE-A6- Bat r.!
s.aes1aHn was whether lne We Ewes :1e
husband as n : szl-e3 * AID :
esnsiag ne discussed LIZ sEesilaz q
car.aGEE z czsr L-e 5a-y should e7-n,
q -1,s cznc. -~aaE 1tz1 Gz-1-g saGU3i
as aws-de5
The ehse waE rivz- - ne Jury z1sU
~ ina zets--0on-
Cases fer To-Day
The fslleuzag eIrL cases ara III a-ae,