New-York tribune., 1920-01-21

Otiaenss letter had been written en-
tirsly by tAs Mayor.
A--"No. sis. he'd tho assistance Of
these shout tAs once"
Qs.-"Mey ] aeA With whom you per-
esnalH AdvassA IN writing this letter :"
A<Iws sf Safse people"
cC~Whe WIZ tssyr A-"Seme Of
the clerks In che ONCE"
Csnsultsd With Ws4son
9r. Tallsy interrupted at this ps5at
and sA3d, inqutringiy, "ls that qusst3su
eetag - aid our investigation I" aA-
drtss1te che turor who asked It Thn
juror e1elai,nsd: ri submit, MY. Die.
sstst Asseens5t ! hsvs !sssiysd yset
sb1ests."
Mr. Ta,lsy sssl, II sysas ~ asssssv
~ ., sss"te:saas ."es ~ ~'tass' tAas eensss
The ns5sr then ssked Il te usiyht
Ani4h bic stetsmsnt, bot .be1sss hs
Jury csiSs III W I'D a. Xsyer ~ K
here ~ttAsut tie Ds0ts3st Assssssy "
covla nrotest ~ witneeD."
NJ. Tsllsy ee11 W w4s tlysSs, snA
where be se~ u wae neHsaeeyt - Pro-
sset witness 10 hsA = sishs u usstS
. statement, en4 tA1 1>1elnas ef the
jury asked The 1AYos q he he'd eey
objection aud ths Mayer replied IL tke
nsgstive.
! jus.s sesin asast saS Mayor who
Hsfrsd h!as eetnyiJs .tAe lstosr. The
Mayer eutA several q Ne slasks. The
1u1es thea s4Asdt "Wts< 80 Wa<se,s
Asxs te q With tsis, p1essef"
The Mayor Aeswsss&, II tAIAsd vfxA
IN nm ssspt ssstsas Sat = ststsn>ns ~
o--Did ~ w,sts tie l',,t Ss.1v sh.s
you svvs ssv 81 tSas js<sssf X~-eszns
part Il i.
o.--Ndnt BE- wssts tae susst csassd.
tssble pesS q ta44 Setees, tie Ayyt that
you ever saN7 A>-As end ta1ksd
TIE Maysr dsat>& tA1t x.. Wstsen
subm3tteA - hius tA1 xaoet eonsiAernhlH
part II tAs ~lsttsr.
Sss~eusa,hss Tssk Msss
IT. IT, is1s1 2rssstss 4is ss.s.ies,
you. the nsjex!sy u e, Ss3s7s you
" w.st. :. = ~ ct 'sr' A"-as susnstssd /.
o-Hew nvsht A>--wss,, 10 4ada't
suemtt.-As eslis6 ~ ~ tAe yhoas. He
and asd . talk about the letter Ia
to him. N. % .o@. sas aaS Nor. :0f aa!.: :'ad ai
your own and I will think Il out my
self" So l went 20 the Mayors office
and Watson called UP and said he had
eouas tdsas. and I told The stsnoerspAer
70 taks down tie ta4as, to sypevrite
them and submit tAem - me. ana what
he suggested and Whist I had there I
put thts Letter into shape and then I
asked the opinion Of ono or two others
around the office thexs what their
view Of II was, and they expressed It
and te WAS their view and Il was
changed again.
Q--Whe does Watssu work tort
A.-Tor 1.-THE New Yest AmsrSe.n.~
On September . ~: Wstson was
Juror: . clipping fssm "1As New York
American" contsinint lsteer from the
Mayer. Asked 70 tlsatafy it aud ssksd
II he ever saw It bsfs1s, the witness
ansvered In the affirmative. He de-
MED that he wrote thA ietter. and tho
juxyy sssds
'.xss :, 10. did ysy w.as> the ma.
{orsty q that lsttsrSs A-Some por.
USV0V
Wssk Il osvsso psspss
Qc-WnaA yertiens7 A-1Aat wsuAa
b 1asa - cay; y to = lss4sr that to
ee.Ny ~ work Of seS1gai people.
o-oadast you dsiSvu4 = no Msyoyt
ed!so na9qusss1pt v13eA i~tospsfatel
sueenae5aa1y vhst .so9tased IN that
lsseef4 Ar-6aSst1at(Sjiy VSsA sppssss.
. fssd pase Il It.
o~-0e you mean te say that you do
not know what part sk t&aA letter yeu
prepA3edY Say ~ ef ae. Al osn-
net sAy yse ef ne.
o-Do ysu know witch psxtf A.
SSnAe HAtts.
o-De yeu knew wAasA pave ~ sr,.
pa&sd! Yeu can i4shsify those psYta.
Ar-l presume 70.
19r. Wsesen Sead Eysea . pAsaer,uh
se4 tAso aaetAsr pes10s1pA, beth el
vhdeh he said hS I'D not recognise a
Ates snA - u ~ third paragraph he
sa!d: Thet Da1aesapA ! wssld ~ il
suhgeeneaslly tie evexsstion made. =
The Juror asked Vim II It wasat
substautaAlly the sugysstien he wrots
and tho wdtness said Yse.
ANes ssediug tie fourth paragraph
asAA - 4fnA SsssA ~sns~.x = xN