Tombstone epitaph., 1920-03-21

procedure. saying that he must as sume that the defense will put forth facts 10 support the evidence which they wish 10 bring out in the exam ination of witnesses. He also said that the pertinent subject under dis cussion is the admissibiliiy Of the evidence of the defense to prove their contention as 10 conditions antedat, ing the deportation. French then continued:
 Any evidence whatever is illega'. for if they made Wheeler believe an imminent danger was present. it is illega! to prove this I; is Illegal also from the standpoint that if the ar rests were made 10 protect the com mun.ty they became Illegal as soon as Inc depor,ees were refused their day in court"
 Judge Pattee then asked him wha, would be his opinion under the sup position that. instead ot the I. w. W. a; B!sbee in 1917. had been a body Of German soldiers. French replied that in such a case there were troops al Naco 10 be called upon. that the courts were funcr.unine. and that. in any event, legal means could have been taken 10 arrest them. Then aft. CT French had spoken concerning th, force with injustice rankles in the human breast. and his belief that all anarchy, all | w. Wism is born in oppression. as well as that the direct action, the syndicaiism, of the l. W. " had is counterpar; in the direct action and synd!ca.ism 0; the depor- ters al Bisbee. Judge Pat,ee remaril- cd that if what had been read by the defense concerning ;he doctrines Q;
 he | W. W. is true 10 member O: hat society can be believed, and he asked French i; il were true that if such a man were 10 De accused of perjury would i, not be permissible to adduce evidence oi hls member. snip in that organization as Q test ol his credibiliiy.
 French had concluded his remarks al this time, When A. 4. Worsley. who is assisting French and George Roark in the eases outlined to the judge the propositions upon which hls remarks in supper; Of his superior's argument would be based this after. noon. Cour, then adjourned.
 This afternoon A. A. Worsley. as- sis,ant counsel for ,he state occup- jed the better part c: aa hou: and half in an addressto the court to ex- clude the defense Of selfdefense and self justification and necessity sought 10 be interposed by the defense. in waich he said in part:
 As the case now stands by the ayowals Of counsel from the defense they confess that they committed the offent charged and they seek to avoid on the grounds Of necessity and under the law of selfdefense.
 Tn their ayowal they admit that the courts Of the land, both state aui federal were func;ioning and were not interrupted for any reason. They admit that the court must take .jr- dic.al knowledge 0: the fact that th7 Gcyernment Of the United States is anLly able to cope with and confine those who offend against its laws They further admit that the court mus take judicial knowledge of the fact that in the Federal District of Arizona here waS a United States Marshal and deputies; that there was 8 Governor and that the Governor and the Sheriff Of the county might summons and call to aid every male citizen 10 preserve law and order.
 They further admit Dy the avoy-- als and their attempt to avoid pun ishment that they had arrested more than eleven hundred men which they claimed were organized into a con spiracy to overthrow the government and to blow up Bisbee and create havoc and disaster. They admit that they had all Of the men arrested and imprisoned in a park at Lowell and they uera prarmed and surrnundaH