The Beaver herald. [volume] (Beaver, O.T. [Okla.]) 1895-1923, 1919-04-17
District Court in Session


aside condition that defendant pay
into court for plaintiff full amount |
| of certificate and Is per cent interest
| to date OF tender, each side to pay
| half of the cost
| A. r. Kirk VS.. 8. NJ. Bancroft. ON
note. dismissed at PLAINTIFFS cost.
Scott &. Blackmer VS.. John A. /
Russell, foreclosure, judgment as per
journal entry.
| Fred Taintor vs. 4. A. Moore, per-
sohal Judgment. death OF defendant
Isuggested. leave to revive.
Frank Goodnight vs.. James r.
Sizelove. for damages, demurrer ov-
erruled and ercepted to, ten days
to answer.
Jessie Hanson VS.. Ed. Hanson, d.
vorce, dismissed for want of prose-
cution.
C. N. Doughty VS.. W.. F. & N. w.
r. Y. Co., appeal J. p. court. demur-
rer overruled.
l.. A. Etzold VS.. Leslie b. Ander-
son. foreclosure. sale confirmed
| ]. w. Reed VS.. ]. l.. Coker. replev-
I in. dismissed at cost OF plaintiff.
| +. b. Collins Inv. Co. VS.. Ernest c.
Howe. foreclosure, judgment as per
journal entry.
A. L. Bartlett VS.. Jacob L. Abbott,
foreclosure, dismissed by plaintiff at
his cost.
Speermore State Bank VS.. Clyde
w. Madison, on noe, demurrer sus-
tanned and permission to file sepa-
rate causes of action.
Scott & Blackmer VS.. William
Hart, foreclosure, judgment as per
journal entry.
/ O., -
Hart, foreclosure, judgment as per
journal entry.
r. II. brennan vs. w. A. Sorter,
attachment, motion to dissolve at
tachment overruled. judgment as per
journal entry.
Ann Elizabeth Thomas VS.. Della
Shermerhorn. partition. report con-
firmed and property ordered sold.
Minnie II. Phillips VS.. Phillips. di-
vorce, decree granted to become ef-
fective in months. $1,000 per
month for support of children.
Nellie Glenn VS.. John Glenn, di.
vorce, dismissed by plaintiff at her
cost.
Scott & ,Blackmer vs.. Edward p
Faller. foreclosure. judgment as pei
} journal entry.
Farmers & Merchants, Grain Co
I VS.. J. W. Gambs ct al. Injunction. not
, permanent. costs taxed to defendant
, Bank Of Beaver VS.. Bolin Hal
Grain Co., on note, continued fol
. term by agreement.
]. p. Cumpton VS.. w. N. Valentino
attachment sale confirmed.
! Otto Barby VS.. Ben w. Bancroft
. foreclosure. judgment as per journa
1 entry.
II. H. Brockhaus VS.. II. NJ. Nc
Chung, cancellation of deed 80 day
to amend petition, copy served on &c
fendant.
"a Ida Merriam VS.. John T. Lindsey
A cancellation of mortgage. judgmen
70 as per journal entry.
w. ]. Black VS.. L. w. Gretchen, I
cancel deed. judgment as per jour
= MIA entry.
" s. M. Taylor VS.. w. 1. Taylor. pal
u tition, demurrer sustained to fir
petitioner defendant answer and e,
II cepted to by defendant.
le J. G.. Bryson VS.. John Mcconnell
le foreclosure, Judgment against Cert
70 Mcconnell, continued for service q
pf to balance of defendantst
~ Scott & Blackmer VS. Frank Ale,
!. ander. foreclosure, judgment as pc
journal entry.
John Bunney VS.. E. l.. Montgon
:. cry. on note, judgment as per J.
- agreement.
u e. C. Thorne VS.. J. II. Goertzel
a. foreclosure. dismissed for want
% prosecution. Cause reinstated.
~ William Gamble vs.. Forrest Gan
re BILE, divorce, decree granted to b
n come effective in six months.
Of Thomas Kinder VS.. Chauncey
o. Bishop. foreclosure. judgment as p
er journal entry.
m Louis M. Murray vs.. F. w. Sal
sv man. appeal ]. p. Court. dismiss'
-, by appellant at his cost.
IN IN William G. Hicks vs.. Fannie ALI
IL foreclosure, dismissed for want
'st prosecution. Cause reinstated.
ci. Mary Z. Weeden VS. w. e. Swat
ell on note continued for term by agre
an ment.
fit Beaver Mere. Co. VS. ]. b. Mort,
irl attachment. judgment as per J. =.
er I. N. Phelps VS.. C. T. Brawsha
nd on account judgment as per J, e.
ic. Howard Dedman VS. Lewis B. Mic
tn OILS. leave granted to permit sher
to amend return on summons
=. speak the truth.
- n. N. Lawson vs.. august NeiHl
~ on contract dismissed at cost OF plai
nw tiff his motion.
lst H. ID. Truax VS.. III. II. Beatty, !
The plevin. dismissed by plaintiff at
cost.
The J. w. Quinn VS.. Bertha Gumm.
vorce. decree granted to become
,ds fective In six months.
10 Walter r. Finley VS.. ]. w. Smi
nat attachment, judgment as per J. e
er johnson Bros Auto Co. VS..
n. Hobbs. money judgment. dismiss
by plaintiff at his cost.
her Beatrice Creamery Co. VS. C.
or Craft. on note. judgment as per
Ing Il.
to Pierce OIL Corporation VS.. B.
Will Brown. statutory liability. dismiss
lri. by plaintiff at his cost.
de- Donley Bros. rs. w. F. & N. w.