The sun., 1919-11-01
APPELLATE COURT
DECISIONS YESTERDAY
Complete List Handed Down
by First Department.

down yesterday by the Appellate d.
vision, First Department:
Rose schendel, respondent, VS.. INTERIOR
oueh Rapid Transit Co., appellant. Judg-
ment and order affirmed with costs No
Henry Zimmerman. appellant, VS. EN-
plre Mortgage Co., respondent. Judgment
affirmed with costs. No opinion. Order
The People, &C.. on complaint Of william
Cohen. respondent. VS. Asbury- o. Leonard.
ion pow 5naF ans Menre 5J
ing) Order fled
The People, &C., respondent. vs.. Jacob
Price. appellant. Judgment affirmed. No
In the matter OF Bronx Parkway Com
mission, respondent. In re James Guthrie
al, respondents, order affirmed with $40
costs costs and and disbursements No opinion
Nelson. Lee & Green. Inc. appellant,
vs.. Isaac Wit, &C.. respondent. Order
affirmed with 80 costs and disbursements,
with leave to plaintiff to serve amended
order appealed from. No opinion. order
Y Philippine Vegetable OIL Co.. respondent,
and order affirmed with costs. No opin-
Frederick R. Eaton, appellant, VS.: w. &
modified by striking. out the words upon
and the order appealed from affirmed
without costs No opinion; Order nled.
- Glare T. Wright as a9mip simon Si,,
impleaded &C., appellants. Judgment and
order affirmed with costs. No opinion.
Order lled.
The Same. respondent VS.. Jacob c.
simon, impleaded, &c. appellant. Judg-
ment and order affirmed with costs. No
Nicholas Fuelner, respondent, Vs. Union
Railway Co. of N. Y. City. appellant Judg-
'p Joseph e. same respondent. VI. Inter-
national High Speed sssei Co. appellant liam,
No opinion. order filed.
Peter McCrann. an infant. &C. respond
ent, VS.. Old Colony Construction Co., Inn
pleaded g. sppeisnt' Sod ap,snn and %rS or
filed.
Patrick McCrann. respondent. VS.. the
Same, appellant Judgment and order af-
nrmed with costs. No opinion. Order fled.
pellants VS.; New York Central Railroad
frmed with costs. No opinion. Order
filed.
Dominick Guas.avino, as admr.. &C., re-
Judgment and order affirmed with costs.
No opinion. Order iled.
Morris Robinson. respondent. VS.. Wilson
Co.. Inc, appellant. Judgment and or
der affirmed with costs. No opinion. Or
der MED.
q,
tus B. .woivin. respondent. order affirmed
with $40 costs and disbursements. No
, opinion. Order filed.
Thomas A. Lewis, appellant, VS. Merritt
| & Chapman Derrick wrecking Co. re-
spondent. order affirmed with $40 costs
and disbursements. No opinion. order
filed
National Gum & Mica Co.. appellant VS..
General Commercial Co.. Ltd, OF Y, s.. re-
| spondent. order affirmed with $40 costs
nied.
Elsie C. Tompkins, respondent, VS.. Ralph
M Crane appellant order m9dihed by
| June 2. 1919. be modified by striking there
from the words Converted to the defend
! posed of; what proceeds were derived from
the said sale. and to whom II was sold
and as so modified affirmed without costs.
| The date for the examination to proceed to
| be fixed In the order. No opinion. Settle
| order on notice.
Howard D. Baird; respondent, VS.. Frank
8. Douglass, appellant. Order affirmed
with tlo costs and disbursements. No
| opinion. Order filed.
| &C., respondent, VS.. Louis II. Hahlo ct al,
! as the Board OF Revision and Assessme nts,
| &C, ct al, appellants. Order affirmed with
$40 costs and disbursements. No opinion.
Moritz d. Splitter appellant. vs.. Childs
Company, respondent. order affirmed with
| Order fled.
Katherine H. Rohloff. respondent, vs.
| Robert NJ. Cats, appellant. order re-
| versed without costs. and order of the City
! Court modified by providing that defend
ant may serve hfs answer upon payment
| of full costs OF the action to be taxed by
the clerk, and by the further provision
| that the Judgment may stand as security
! and staying the action of the Sheriff in the
! further execution Of the Judgment until
| the action be finally determined. No opin-
| ion. Settle order on notice.
Jacob A. Kirsch. appellant, VS.. Pacific
Commercial Co. respondent; Order AZ
\ No opinion. order lled.
torenz Reich, appellant. VS.. Alexander
S. Cochran ct al. as Exrs,. sc. respond,
| ents. order affirmed with $40 costs and
disbursements No opinion. Order iled
| Harry Goodman, appellant. vs. Louis
Rubinstein ct Al respondents, IT,. Order af-
| No opinion. order nied.
william W. Cunningham. appellant. VS.
reversed T Without costs ana motion granted
! - the extent of striking from the original
order for examination the Items Nos and
coed to be fxed In the order. No opinion
Milton c. ouimby. respondent, VS.. Scan
| appellant. order reversed with $40 cost.
and disbursements and motion granted
with $40 costs, on the ground that 1t doe,
| not appear that the party sought to b.
examined has any personal knowledge OF
the matters which are the subject of tbs
e1smnaSi01 uS 0Ger nneS re,nonasnt
I
| Cast-A-Liner Co.. Inc, ct al, appellants
Order modified by providing that the In
| junction shall become imperative in the
event that defendants within fve day.
J from service OF this order with notice OF
/ entry thereof file an undertaking in tbs
| sum of $1,000 for any damages plaintiff
| may sustain: and as so modified affirmed
without costs. No opinion. Order filed.
| Frances NJ. Carleton. respondent. vs.
Alexander Carleton. appellant. Order af
nrmed with $40 costs and disbursements
No opinion. Order filed.
| ]. Kearsley Mitchell ct al. respondents
| VS.. William F. Hudson ct al, impld., &C.
| appellants. Order affirmed with $40 cost
and disbursements. No opinion. ordel
filed.
Hugh F. Curry, respondent. vs. Francii
| X. Cody, appellant. order affirmed with
$40 costs and disbursements. No opinion
sesfried Lowenthal. Inc: respondents
liant Order affirmed with $40 costs anC
disbursements, The date for the examina'
No opinion, Settle order on notice,
George II. Benson, respondent. vs.
George w; Fanning, ct al: appeiiaaatis or
ments. No opinion. order aied.
Sarah Goldberg. respondent, VS.. DAME
Smith. Sc, appellant. Order reversed witt
$40 costs and disbursements and motor
granted with $40 costs No opinion Or
Raymond @. coghlsn. respondent. va
Charles +. Jenkins et al, appellants. or
der AFFIRMED with $40 costs and disburse
The Same, respondent, VS. the Same, ap
pellants. order affirmed with $40 cost
and disbursements. No opinion. orde
Fred otte, Jr., respondent. VS.. Interio
Metal Manufacturing Co, appellant. Or
der affirmed with $40 costs and disburse
msnts NE Ne opinion Order tiled' ou
dent Vs. Sunbeam Chemical Co., Inc, ap