The sun., 1919-10-18
APPELLATE DIVISION DECISIONS
The Appellate Division of the Supreme
Court, First Department. announced the
following decisions yesterday:

II S&NS
| The Appellate Division of the Supreme
Court, First Department, announced the
Following decisions yesterday:
| william II: Cox, respondent, Va. Central
| hshroad OF Hayti, Inc, appellant. Order 30
Iar as appealed from affirmed with $40 costs
and disbursements, the date for the examina-
tion TO proceed to DO fixed in the order No
| opinion. Settle order on notice.
| Moses Levinson and ano, appellants, vs.. Leo
frlned with $40 costs and disbursements. No
| opinion. Order filed. -,
Br SOrrs CO sresnali respondent vs. Brown
affirmed with $40 costs and disbursements. No
opinion. Order filed.
nm the matter OF the application Of David
| Hlrshhed, Commissioner, SC, appellant, W.
| Stephen j. Hanley, respondent. Order affirmed
| MIN MIN VIZ costs and disbursements. No opinion
Ellwood G. Jackson. appellant, VS.. ]. X.
S Win $40 SiSSmpony' respondent Order affirmed
ground that there is no proper proof that the
al, sndant foreign corporation. Order
In the matter OF the application Of BENJAMIN
| oa'luson, &C. respondent, Joseph Monaco,
ms r,i' .s VS.; Vas samuel Blank appellant yuds-
Metropolitan PetrOieum Corporation SI' of Del.
aware, respondent VS.. Harry Content. ct al.
appellants Order affirmed with $40 costs and
4 disbursements. The date for the examina ton
60 proceed to be fixed in the order. No opinion.
William II. Craig, respondent. vs. william
P. jerks; appellant. Order affirmed with $40
| filed.
First National Bank Of Ann Arbor. Mich,
order affirmed VIC sic costs 81 AN and "p aisburse
ments, The date for the examination to pro-
coed to he fixed In the order. No opinion
In the matter Of Aron Datesgold. deceased.
Order reversed with $40 costs and disbursements
and the motion granted, and the time OF the
appellant which u ser said
Is extended for ten days from date Of entry
OF this order. No opinion. Order hled;
POWERS as executor. c., impeaded &c, ap.
pellant. Order affirmed with $40 costs and
disbursements. No opinion. Order fled
Anita Reohr. respondent VS.. Charles d.
Reohr,, appellant, Order modified by reducing
counsel fee to the sum of $500. and as so modi-
fed affirmed without costs No opinion,
Pitts6urg Wool Company, Inc. respondent.
with SO costs and and t the mo-
tion granted with $40 costs. No opinion.
In the matter Of the application Of Anna W.
Simpson, as general guardian, &c, re Richard
c. Bondy ct al, trustees, &c Order affirmed
with $40 costs and disbursements. No opinion.
: In the matter Of appointment Of Commits
sioners. &c. to ascertain eompensation which
should be justly made to Il. G. Martens and
, | y. #. Martens, 70 closing Of Reds Mil Lane
Bronx. Order affirmed with $40 costs and dis
sn 1,tns No opinion Clarke p IL d.;
Is not satisfactorily shown that Reds Mil
Lane was ever %,.s public street or thorough
William Hahn, appellant. VS. Philip Rich
!. man and another, respondents. Order re.
versed with $40 costs and disbursements and
the motion granted with $40 costs. No opin
ion. Order filed.
ei Thomas F. Lee, respondent. vs.. Lawrence
i $40 costs and disbursements. No opinion
, Dowhng. j.. dissentinS.) Order filed.
1 In the matter of Kariene D. King. de
| sod nrIar ufA xartth am
J. disbursements. No opinion. Order filed.
Equitable Social Club. Inc. appellant. VS.
5 ct al. respondents. ~ order affirmed with 81
2 costs and disbursements. No opinion. ordei
s filed.
Q samuel Bernstein. respondent. vs.. Esska,
z Waist Company, ct al, appellants. ordei
. modified so to provide that the order FOL
I examination before trial Of officers Of de
9 the names and titles OF the officers of thu
g defendant corporation. and inserting instest
following: The defendant Esskay wsis
Il Company by samuel Krohnberg, its treasurer
IS and Louis Krohnberg, IT'S represent; D
:. affirmed with $40 costs and disbursement
10 to the appellants The date Ior the examl
It nation 10 proceed to De hxea n IN tne oroe'
n Lorena l.. Marsten, respondent, vs.. Ma
l. thanel A. Millman and another, appellants
II ments. The date for the examinaiion .
A. proceed to be fixed in the order. No opin
5 'o Lionel Hagenaers and another, appellants
IS respondents, VS.. Julie c. Caballero. implicated
It Sc, respondent appellant. order anirme
without costs to either party. No opinion
ST Booklovers Sales Co.. Inc, appellant appellant. y
Picloria keveW s,o 90 Costs and disbursement.
g No opinion. Order filled
"a Harlow S. Dixon and another as admin
% i,trators &C., appellants, VS.. Eustac
q Conway. individually and as receiver. SC
81 ct. ais, defendants and Charles F; VII
% SO costs and disbursements. No opinion
\. Annie Copeland as sdminist IRA ID &C
= New Jersey, respondent order affirme
z z With SO costs and disbursements n
9. 0p PsSpie eT rel. Aimee Baker. respor
2; dent VS.. walter Baker. appellant orde
reversed and petition dSI w tbn, tbs ni r,
iator is not an inhabitant OF the sta,
New York as r TsasiIsa 0y . s0'iS ORD.
. Knomark Products Corporation. Ape
IT liant vs. A. Mai nfsirmeS With SIC o' cos
and disbursements. No opinion ora'
=. John F. MacEnu,ty. respondent, y
70 Carnegie steel Company, appellant. Ord
modihed by striking out the provision e
ts ss.e sA on this eom%issOn. and SO
ifed affirmed without costs NO opinio
Sam Samuel a'' Krohnoerg and another. as CT
7 partners, &c.. appellants, vs.. Loui. .sheu
y. Respondent. Order reversed, with $40 cost
~ and disbursements and the mo,ion denie
with $40 costs and the order ier minaiinn
proceed 10 be fixed In the order. No opinio
- Settle order on notice. .r
4. Shippers Car Line, Inc. appellant, "
Brown Hosting Machinery Company n
sPOnasnt Order s agsop t ora sse fEs ea
''S William Rosen6la,i., APPELLANT. "; W -!
In sriTmed' with SO costs and disbursement
No opinion. ORDER filed
COMPANY, Inc, appellant. Order reverse
with SO costs and disbursements and Il
motion denied with $40 costs, on the authori
CIR Of Kenheim .ys; Harris Gas Ap' Div.' q
N, -'T Birdie II. surut. respondent, VS.. Hen
snTat4 appellant. Order modified by r
ducine alfmony to the sum Of 5000
month and as so modified affirmed wit
out costs. No opinion. order nled.
In the % %sre6an o. t ac " apbesnI
v William f. Schneider. as clerk. sc, r
" snnndent. order affirmed with $40 cos
and disbursements. No opinion. Ord
L. filed ,.. a.
e. Order reversed with $40 costs and d
Sursaments and motion granted with :
Costs. No opinion. order hled
Samson Rosenblatt appellant vs.
= Brown, Inc. respondent order revers
m lion denied with $40 costs. on the grou
that the proper remedy for the relief q
y sired would be by motion for bill OF pa
ticulars order hled.
jay @. wilbraham, respondent VS.; Jen
aimed with $40 costs and disbursement
| - dnIniOu. Order nled.