The theocrat. [volume] (Zion City [i.e. Zion], Ill.) 1914-1949, 1919-04-26


efficient services the time the the stock
on an facts of had s,t & to he
had been faithful and loyal employee Of the Appellant
posed distribution of stock and the subsequent details Of the plan
& @ % @ of T he stSn p a se M ape
Of the stock the Company about
executed on behalf Of the appee and delivered him
became the Of large OF the
O. he & 3 M sPp n w o ante aia into t s
held an important and confidential position with said international
edge xsf; for the time the tne
said year, guilty Of conpng with sundy persons
M heaS & s THE on the 1905
National Company and his advice and counsel in the matter Of puas
co%pan During the appellant the directors
for the thousand and tereuPon
and officers relying the advice of appellant directed the purchase
Prior purchase Willis Swift brother of appellant
option purchase Hsdy patents fifty
@ SGo and hs the ha % o M
for dollars said Willis C. Swift completed the
sand dollars Which was furnished appellant Shortly
and paid therefor Charles Cairns who acting
for said Willis Swift the of thousand dollars. Out
slel41 profit
stockholders officers and Company
In the option to purchase ts the ade patents said wills
well knew that the could be purchased for $4,000 and entered
his influence with the officers OF the international Company and the
patents sum largely in excess Of the amount for which Hady was
wiling d The the of the
by appellant for the of making for himself out of that
in Hs. Sy %
patent
a AZ @ Ierna appean s on f
the McCom Company purchased from his brother said sxeig
the MsconeE $3.50 BY
Willis Swift hereupon
under his assumed Of Henry Chat6d transferred said six
Instrument dated june H. l9oB 4S"' company
@ ge paT OF a sn wh R ae & the
made large profit Out of the purchase was unknown to the officers
s OF said G Appfsn d apRfss
and furnishes the therefor with the intent and
in him by the odicers and directors of the Mccormick COM
price paid therefor BY largely
Company devised by appellant for his own MP PrG he other times
1902 and 5 eye e96 o teoh h M his nd
thereof deEraud the Company ways
employees Of the by the apPees were made on
facts above set forth concerning the appellant
the d Of the % nj fhd s said gd1 anntaa
the certificate in controversy SIX hundred shares Inter-
o4 have @ med e % SaS APPsn nsX
Company Company above forth had been
known aPpee gift Of any kind would have been made by
appellant well knowing that said distribution RIB was eonmpd Con
he had dauded said company and had betrayed the
by appellant the transactions above
enabled
distribution Said gift of six hundred shares of stock from apelees
appellant obtained by appellant by fraudulent onceamen
entitled receive gift from appelees and said
applees obtained by appellant through the
fraudul ent of appellant
By the facts above forth applees elected
said hundred
appellant o which is $4,000.
a
transferring disposing Of the certificate
of the final
be decreed by the that the gift made by appeees
appellant procured by part
appees
said certificate that appellant deed
appear has disposed of the certificate that appeees
may a against him for its money value.
bill verified by the affidavit appellee Cyrus H. Mccormick
which allegations his knowledge