The fool-killer., 1919-10-01

ctllu ClldC was ClIG VSIy CIlllIS CIldC
Saul had to die for-because he
consulted that old witch. Here
i. the proof:
So Saul died for his transgressions
which he had committed against the
Lord, even against the word of the
Lord, which he kept not, AND ALSO
FOR ASKING COUNSEL OF ONE
THAT HAD A FAMILIAR SPIRIT,
TO INQUIRE OF IT.-F'irst Chroni-
cles 1913.
That ought to settle your
hash on that question. Of
course it was not Samuel that
appeared and talked to Saul. It
was the very same old devil that
appears at the Spiritualist
shindigs of today.
The Bible often denounces
familiar spirit but never says
anything good about them. Like
this, for instance:
Regard not them that have famil-
lar spirits, neither seek after wizards,
to be defiled by them.-Leviticus
1881.
And when they shall say unto you,
Seek unto them that have familiar
spirits, and unto wizards that peep,
and that n1utter: should not people
seek unto their God ?1sa;ah 8:19.
!. Now, John, don't you ever be
fool enough to get caught in
CHAT trap any more.
Now the thief on the cross
next. You think Christ meant
that he was going back to hea-
ven to his Father that very day,
and that he was going to take
the repentant thief with him.
Then why did he tell the women
at the tomb three days later
that he had not YET ascended
to his Father? You seem to be
sorter mixed on it, anyhow, and
part of the time you seem to be
arguing that Christ went to hell
and preached to the folks that
got drowned in the flood. Mercy
on us, is hell and Paradise all
the same, and is that where
Christ took the thief to?
You seem TO believe that the
immortal souls Of the Antedelu-
vians were in a burning hell suf-
fering conscious torment! and
you say you can't help but think
that Jesus went to that hell ano
preached to those people and Of
fared them a chance to get eter
ral life even after they were
dead. What? The very idea o:
offering an immortal being
chance to GET Immortality! 1
they had an endless, undyin{
life already there would certain
ly be no chance to add anything
to it. It would be like trying
to fill up a hole that was alread,
full. Don't you see how yo1
contradict yourself at ever
turn? Suppose I come into you
home and say, Here, John, [ az
) going to give you this home.
l You would say, "Why, Jim, ar
you crazy? This is already m
} home. What are you talkin
y about?" And for Christ to o1
i fer Immortality to people wh
S ;.lready had it would be just 6
+ unreasonable as that.
u And, worse than ever, yor
g line of reasoning would newt;
+ bly, lead to a sure-enough "se
e end chance just as straight ;
/ IN old yaller-hammer going
d his dead tree. If the flood vi
$ TINS were offered a seco1
) chance, everybody else mu
,. have a second chance, to
u or else God will be using partia
u ty. Goodness knows, | thil
Ie the flood victims had one pref
=" good chance, if anybody ev
Le did. Noah preached to them f
Il a hundred and twenty years, al
Sc if that wasn't a fair chance
Jesus thought it necessary
d, call on them in their brimsto
es quarters and preach to the
m some more-then what are y
Id going to do about the countle
T. millions who have died witho
to ever hearing any preaching
Id all? Why don't somebody