The Morning Tulsa daily world. [volume] (Tulsa, Okla.) 1919-1927, 1919-11-07
NEVER MADE ANY DEAL
Did Not Offer immunity i'll
Order to Get Testimony
Involving Kriegcr.
MUSKOGEE MAN TESTlFIES
In Same Cell With Defendant
Heard Him Make Remark
About Mexico Deals.

ImpcachinE Witnesses FOR the de-
Tense In their statements as to III" re
lauons existing between Charles
KrirEer accused of dynnmiung the
j Il. Pew home IN this city October
20, lgl7. Hubert Vowel. ana John
Han. prior to the destruction Of th"
residence j. T. Pew ana J.. II. Gar
rett OF Muskugce, yesterday before
district court cOniradicicd u number
of the most important occurrences
upon which the defense bases It's
appeal for acqulttal
Pew IN his testimony. denied he
had had any converse tlnh with Han
in the federal JAIN al Muskogec on
February ;. 1913. ns related by Hal
on The witness stand. The witness de-
clarcd he made Han no offer OF any
Kind for confession, lie said thar
when he asked Hail for the truih
ABOUT the moving up OF the nome,
II was madc because Han had been
sentenced TO the federal prison at
Leayrn worth for five years, and
Few believed thut under This sen
tence. Hail would not be nversc 10
telling what he Knew about the rev
affair. Hall, Pew said. denied know r.
ing Eowrlls prior to January OF
1918. but upon being shown Pho
tographs OF letter written by liaIl
10 Nuwclls December 2k, lSl7 ana
postcard written by Hall at Jop-
lin, Mo. to Nowells' wife AT 10 south
Norfolk Tulsa, on Deoemher n
1917, admitted his friendship win
Vowells Pew did promise Hall he
| said, the the latter after serving
the fivc-year sentence for robblns
The postofficr at Tar RIVER, would
not be prosecuted by Pew after me
sentence was ended. II lIall would
IE, .., he information az his com
mand about the crime against ie"
and his family
NowclIs' Confession Voluntary.
Pew denied that In his cuuNersa
ton with Hall In the Muskogee jan
iu trhrrury " 1918 he ever men
toned krlcger az the party believed
lie. .puusihir TOR m" crime Han
testified that Pew had talked about
kticgcr as the man who Re~ sought
to prosecute for the uit'uHe
Vowplla' confession was obtained
I nT'tT nc Nhu Iffil t'll .'li' w ~ 80
federal pcnitentihry FOR five years
Pew said but there was no prom ise
OF any aid TO NOWellS To obtain the
confession
l.. ~ Garrett. confined I'm the city
jall at Muskogec from November 10.
1871, to May &, 1913, testified lha'
one day. as ne and kricg"r were
standing at the door "f their cell
30. 2. krirger saw Hall pass In ipe
corridor. and turning to the witness
KricPcr said II knew mat man IN
New Mexico and | don't want to seN
him here" This testimony Disputes
the statements OF kricger that he
never In his life saw Hall unul they
met in the jan at Mnskogce
Sought thc Instigator
The rebuttal testimony Of lhY
coniradfcts I'm many points The storN
related on the stand hy Han de
fcnse witness, particularly with re-
lations 10 any offers made by Pew
or joe Drprw Of MuskoRce, rcla-
tive to any immunity which might
be shown Hall II he told tho trulh
about the dynamiting Of the Pew
home Pew said hat his entire IN
ves'igation OF Han aud the latter .
actions were for the one purpose OF
obtaining credirahle evidence ns 20
the guilt Of 'hc party who chuH"d
Han, Vowells and henson 10 commit
the crime Pew stated that at the
time he fir~i saw Han he knew
nothing OF kricEcr pnd thn' the IN
vesrigatiOn was solely for the pur-
pose Of discovering m" person a'
/ whose ins iPa'ion the Grim" was
| committed Pew said that AZ ina
| time he was certain as 10 The men
| who actually placed The dynamite
under the house and exploded H. hut
| hat he was equally certain that
| fourth party planned the crlnin
act