Northern Wisconsin advertiser. [volume] (Wabeno, Wis.) 1898-1925, 1919-10-24
SENATE BEATS THE
LODGE AMEN DMENT
Keeps Shantung Deal in the
Treaty of Peace.
BALAoT STANDS 55 TO 35
Only Three Democrats Favored tina
Change, While Ia Republicans
Voted Against Any Change in
the Peace Pact.

Washington, Oct. 1.-THE senate
voted to place the seal of its ratifica-
ton on the Shantung settlement.
BY vote of SO to SO, the foreign
relations committee amendment restor
relations committee amendment re-
storing Shantung to China was re-
iected.
Senator Lodge, Republican leader
Immediately upon the announcement
of the roll call, gave notice that he
would offer motion later to wipe all
reference to Shantung from the treaty
Result Not Unexpected.
The result was no surprise, although
the majority against the amendment
was somewhat larger than had been
anticipated. This was caused by the
detection of IA Republicans, all OF
whom, however, declared they would
insist upon a reservation expressing
Americas disapproval of the Shan
tung award. Most of these senator's
opposed the amendment, not because
of any lack of sympathy with its pur-
poses, but because they feared an
amendment might destroy the treaty
For the same reason, some of them
will vote against the johnson amend
ment, to give the United States as
many votes in the league as the Brit
ish empire, and indications are that
the Johnson amendment will meet the
same fate as the Shantung amend
ment.
How the Senators Lined Up.
Here is the way the senate lined up
on the Shantung amendment:
For the amendment-Republi
Ball, Delaware; Borah, Idaho; Brande-
gee, Connecticut; Calder, New York !;
Capper, Kansas; Curtis, Kansas; Dill
lingham, Vermont; Fall, New Mexico;
France, Maryland; Frelinghuysen, New
Jersey Gronna, North Dakota Hard
ing, Ohio; Johnson, California; Jones,
Washington; Knox, Pennsylvania La
Follettee, Wisconsin; Lodge, Massa-
fhusetts; Mccormick, Illinois; Nc
Lean, Connecticut; Moses, New Hamp-
shire; New, Indiana Newberry, Mich
igan; Norris, Nebraska; Page, Yer
mont; Penrose, Pennsylvania Phipps,
Colorado; Poindexter, Washington;
Sherman, Illinois; Sutherland, West
Virginia; Wadsworth, New York War
rem, Wyoming; Watson, Indiana-32.
Democrats: Gore, Oklahoma Reed,
Missouri Walsh, Massachusetts,
Total 80.
Against the ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ans: Colt, Rhode Island; Cummins,
Iowa. Hale, Maine; Kellogg, Minneso-
ia; Kenyon, Iowa Keyes, New Hamp-
shire; Lenroot, Wisconsin McCumber.
North Dakota; McNary, Oregon; Nell
son, Minnesota Smoot, Utah; Spencer,
Missouri; Sterling, South Dakota;
Townsend, Michigan-14.
Democrats: Ashurst, Arizona Bank
head, Alabama; Beckham, Kentucky;
Chamberlain, Oregon; Culberson, Tex
as; Dial, South Carolina; Fletcher.
Florida; Gay, Louisiana Gerry, Rhode
Island; Harris, Georgia; Harrison.
Mississippi; Henderson, Nevada
Hitchcock, Nebraska; Jones, New Mex
leo; Kendrick, Wyoming; King, Utah:
Kirby, Arkansas; Mcclellan, Tennes-
see; Myers, Montana; Nugent, Idaho;
Overman, North Carolina; Owen, Ok
lahoma; Phelan, California; Pittman,
Nevada; Pomerene, Ohio; Ransdell,
Louisiana Robinson, Arkansas Shep-
pard, Texas; Shields, Tennessee; Sim
mons, North Carolina Smith, Arizona
Smith, Georgia; Smith, Maryland;
Stanley, Kentucky; Swanson, Virginia:
Thomas, Colorado; Trammell, Florida;
Underwood. Alabama; Walsh, Mon
tana; Williams, Mississippi; Wolcott,
Delaware-41 Total, So.
Of the senators not voting Senators
Edge (Rep.), New Jersey; Martin
(Dem.) Virginia; Smith Oem.) South
Carolina Johnson (Dem.>, South Da-
kota, were paired against the amend
ment. Senators Elkins (Rep) of West
Virginia and Fernald Rep) of Maine
were paired for it.