Norwich bulletin., 1919-10-17
ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD
 OVER PROPERLY TRANSFER

Charges that Richard C. DaVlCSOn or New London Ellen of Davidson of x New York, and Mrs. Emma Oeser of Law renee Mass, fraudulently induced Mrs. Grace E. Ramsey of New York to part With real estate in New London were made in trial before Judge Joel H. Reed in the superior court at New London Thursday
 Mrs. Ramsey's husband and chil- dren. Thomas H. Ramsey and Thomas H. Ramsey IT, and Ellen D. Ram sey of Brooklyn. made the allega tions. They claim that the defendants took advantage of Mrs. Ramsey's mental condition, just prior to her death. and executed a fraudulent deed which conveyed to them the property in dis pute. The suit is for 5000.
 They claim that the defendants re- fuse to give up the property and that their action deprived the heirs the . inheritance
 The complain sets forth that on June 21. 1917. Mrs. Grace E. Ramsey died in Brooklyn, survived by her hus- band and two children. who are the plaintiffs in the case, the children be- ing heirs at law. She left will which devised all her estate. real. personal and mixed Emma Davidson now Emma D.
 Oeser and Ellen F. Davidson. her sisters in trust for the benefit of the children untiI they reached the age of 21 years when it was. to be tran sferred to them freed from said trust.
 On May 27. the eXecutrices having renounced all rights to letters testa- mentary under the will. the will was admitted to probate in the surrogate court in New York and letters of ad- ministration were issued to Thomas H. Ramsey. Mrs. Ramsey's husband.
 On November 20. 1918. MT. Ramsey was appointed administrator of his wofe's estate by the probate court of New London.
 It is alleged that Thomas H. Ram seX, and Ellen D. Ramsey are now of full age and entitled to the estate, in volving property in New York and New London.
 The complaint sets forth that on June F, 1917. Grace Ramsey as one of the heirs of the late James Davidson of New London, was the owner in fee simple of an undivided interest in five lots of land, with buildings thereon. Her interest consisted of one seventh of three of the lots and one fourteenth of the other two lots.
 On June IT. Mrs. Ramsey was feeble and inf1rm and unsound of mind and incapaciated from making any con- tracts or transacting any business. Knowing this the defendants fraudu- lently took advantage of her condition and mental incapacity and gained as- tendency over her. undu1y influencing he'd so that they procured her to sign and deliver to them. without consider ation, a writing purporting to be a deed conveying to the defendants all her in terest in her property in this city.
 The plaintiffs claim that because of Mrs. Ramsey's incapacity. the deed was void and illegal and pray the court to annul and set it aside and ask for a reconveyance to them of the property
 The property in question is part of a property at Fort Neck. in Smith, Ham ilton, Goshen and Chelsea streets on which the late James Davidson con- ducted a shipyard.
 Attorney Abel P. Tanner and George c. Morgan of New London and Willis Davis of New York appear for the plaintiffs and Attorneys Geory, Davis and Keefe are counsel for the Aefend- ants.