The Barre daily times. (Barre, Vt.) 1897-1959, 1919-11-13
LOSING HER HUSBANDS.
Catherine Summers Is Petitionee for
Second Time in a Week.

Divorce cases were heard Wednesday
in Washington county court, one of
which was another chapter in the Sum-
mers matter. Henry Summers asked
the court to give him a divorce from
Catherine Summers, whose marriage to
Edward Latuch was annulled last Sat
urday morning. Evidence was intro
dueed to show that Mrs. Summers had
more affection for a man named Charles
Keith at the time she was living in
Barre than she had for her husband,
who, in testifying, made several point
ed statements in connection with the
case The grounds set up are adultery.
Information on the charge Of adultery
has been flied in county court against
the woman.
Later A. A. Sargent asked the court
to secure letters which are now in the
United States district attorneys hands,
claiming that these added to his case.
These letters are said TO contain I'M
mailable matter Judge Butler asked
the petitioner as to his habits The
petition asked that nine year-o
daughter be placed in the custody Of
the petitioners parents.
In the case of G. IT, Eddy vs. Edith
Eddy, the court ordered suit money in
the sum of $50 The defendant has
engaged an attorney to fight the case.
The hearing in the case Of Frank O..
Woodcock vs. Hope Woodcock also oe-
curred during the afternoon In this
case the petitioner testified that the
defendant made love to man who
was working at the place and that one
day while they were riding home from
Barre she laid her head on this mans
shoulder, also that Woodeock was told
at their house at one time that II he
did not like their actions be could get
out.
Testimony was heard this morning
in the divorce case N Lydia w Demp-
sey IS. Joseph Dempsey, and this aft
ernoon the evidence in Evelyn Green
slit Us, Glenn d. Bradbury will be tax
en-, it was announced at noon. This is
a bastardy case.
Divorce Docket Cleaned Up.
The divorce docket in county court
was cleared Of several cases Just be.
fore noon to-day, when different orders
were made la several cases, in three
of which one Of the parties is dead
The first case under consideration was
Flora 3. Bancroft VS. Charles Def Ban
croft, which has been on the docket
since 1911 The court inquired why
this case should not 90 off the docket
Judge e. M. Harvey explained to the
court tho situation and that the par
ties are not living together, but that
good was being accomplished from the
case standing on the docket, and the
case was continued.
The case of Susan Duke VS.. Forest
Duke, being eight years old, was dis
continued The case of Jennie Pike VS..
Martin Pike was disposed OF by death
of plaintiff. Sayoie vs.. Sayoie was dis.
continued because the parties have re-
snmed living together Divorce was de-
nied in this case last March, and a new
case was brought.
Two cases in which the same parties
were involved were discontinued These
were Carrie Drew vs.. Charles Drew
The plaintiff had died recently. They
are Nos. l72 and 81 on the docket
In the case of Mary Barton vs.
Charles Barton, death OF plaintiff was
suggested and in the companion case
death of defendant suggested and both
cases We're dropped. lyis Tibbetts vs..
Harry Tibbetts and the companion case
will not be brought forward.
Candido Gomez VS.. Ann Gomez, dis
continued; Alice Carver VS.. John w.
Carver, discontinued; Eva Perry VS..
Arthur Perry, discontinued; Harlow
Fulsom vs.. Bertha Folsom, discontin-
ued; Florence Bottiggi vs.. Angelo Bot
tiggi and companion case, continued;
Bertha Folsom VS.. Harlow Folsom, dis
continued