Albuquerque morning journal. [volume] (Albuquerque, N.M.) 1903-1926, 1919-10-28

Dominick, Doughton, Evans, (Ne
yada); Ferris, Fisher, Flood, Garrett
Goodwin, Harrison, Hastings. Hayden
toward, Huddleston, Hudspeth. Hun
tTennessee); Jacow Johnson, (Mis.
S.Ss!ppi)i Jones, (TeXasJ; Lanaham
landlord, Larson, Lee. (Georgia)
Major, Mann. (South Cdroliaa)
Ways, Nelson, (Missouri)) Oldfield
Oliver, Park, Paris, Quinn, Raker
Rayburn, Romju Rubey. Rucker
Sanders, Uouisiana); Smithwicl,
Steagall Stedman, Stevenson, Sum
mers, (Texas); Taylor, (Colorado)
Tlllman, Upshaw, Venable. Vinson.
y1tkin, Watson. virginia. Weaver,
yelling, Welty, Wi son, (Louisiana)) +
Wingo, Woods, (Virginia) Wright
Young, (Texas) -Total democrats. rs.
Miscellaneous, for 49, Randall, pro
mbit1onist earns, Keller and Kelly
! (Pennsylvania); independents. To.
al for 176.
Against - Republicans: 'Classon.
,uTy, California;; Dyer, Edmonds,
Garland, Glynn, HUI tIowaJ; Jei.
RS, JUL Lampert. Lufkin, Near
hur,, MacGregor, MAIDEN, Merritt.
Mudd, Nichols (Michigan) Nolan.
olatt, Randall, (Wisconsin); Rogers,
sanford, Snyder. stephens. (Ohio)
tllson. Tinllham, Walsh, Ward Wins
low. Total republicans against 20.
Democrats-Bee, Blackman, Bland.
(MisourD. Buchanan, CampbelD
Pennsylvania)i Clark, (Missour)
Cleary, Dent, Doremus. Dupre, Eagan,
Gallagher Gard, Griffin, Hersman
Humphreys, Igoe, McGlenon, Me
Lane, Martin. Mead, Moon. Phelan,
Pou, Sherwood, Whaley Total demo-
Gratis against &c.
Total against 5j.
The presidents veto message fol-
lows
TO the house of representatives:
Il am returning without my sigma
ture II. r. $50. An act to prohibit
intoxicating beverages, and to regu-
Iale the manufacture, production use
and sale of high proof spirits for
other than beverage purposes and to
insure an amply supply of alcohol |
and promote its use IN scientific re-
search and in the development of fuel, |
I'VE and other lawful industries
The subject matter treated in this |
measure deals with two distinct
phases of the prohibition legislation. !
one part of the act under consider
atlon seeks to enforce wartime pro-
hlbiuon. The other provides for the /
enforcement which was made neces-
sary by the adoption of the conatitu- 4
tional amendment. / object to and H
cannot approve that part of this legis Il
lation with reference to war time il
prohibition
1t has to do with the enforcement Il
of an act which was passed by reason II
of the emergencies of the war and Il
whose objects have been satisfied in
the rehabilitation of the army and II
navy and whose repeal | have already II
sought at the hands of congress. Il
Where the purposes of particular
legislation arising out of war emer- II
gency have been satisfied, sound pub
lie policy makes clear the reason and Il
necessity for repeal.
IT Will not be difficult for con-
gress, in considering this importantII
matter, to separate these two cues
IONS and effectively legislate regard
ing them; making the proper distinc- /
ton between temporary causes which
arose out of war time emergencies
and those like the constitutions
amendment of prohibition, which now
Is part of the fundamental law of the
I'm all matters having to do with
he personal habits and customs of
arge numbers of our people, we must
BE certain that the established pro
'esses of legal change are follows In Z
40 other way can the salutary object
sought to be accomplished by great
'eforms of this character be made
satisfactory and permanent
Slgned) WOODROW WILSON,
Inc white House, october q, 1919"