The Democratic advocate. [volume] (Westminster, Md.) 1865-1972, 1919-09-26

ne I14I8HIHE 8uIN0II7I - ~
lIahed IN he sykesYIlle Herald. last
week.
Senator Nafdeld. IN his letIer n
he taxpayers Of Carroll county. pub
Ilshed n he sYksaXIIle Herald ii
week. hHa eenIefed he attention d
he people N lie fundamental IHz4s
n The coming eleefIon-fhe question
If LasaII0n He Insists TINT viii
nracIinai business methods employed
n the administration Of our county
affairs. there would hive haen no
need Tor N increase N lie lax rate
tbs YaaT u IIIIt per eeHl=zln oIheF
words. Win m increase If more
znan SIX millions Of dollars N nnr
taxable basIa IN INo years. tie Old
raI. should have Yielded money HuiIIz
Gent 10 hive M al legitimate nm
ming expenses d Tie County and nT0z
xIdad fnr road nd aEI0nl Improve
nanI Inakead. however. lie IA rae
Advances n keep naee KIIh he IN
crease IN ne IaxHhle haEIa. Yielding
: revenue Iargen INN - haYe eYaT
md and without giving ny ton
znIeu0uz return. II addition. :
heavy burden hna been plaeeI On he
people nd 1t he same Tine he
School board haH been Obliged II
bring IL program for he better
menI Of our school system u hit
Nothing i being done IN this dIfea=
ton nax. 10T Ine reas0n lhaI III
County Commissioners have virtually
repndIaIs1 4 solemn agreement vii
me School board. under which atal.
ID .nms we're p N expended Yeafls
Tor period n I've xHarH n pnnxla1
M Esffer facilities. KoI onIx IN
the County Commissioners WITHHELD
the money 10 permit he finishing D
improvements already begun. but m.
refused u authorize he lnIereH
money II aaHa the School Bar.
negotiated Ioan i enable ii
projects - Be finished Tie HsTall
haa To often discussed The need .
Improved school facilities n make |
necessary u n over The gronnl
again Thai he situation n II
County i daplnrahIe aud dIHsfaneTn
Is vel known u 81 citizens.
could nuI vel be worse ana haE
any schools a Al. ! ~ IaK
years n remad. Il. b the apnllea
ton Of business principles. hHrl
common sense an1 HIse economy.
1t never would have existed n
these principles been applied N II
par Of he County Commissioner
The responsibility i directly their
because IhEy hi. u provide Ii
money Tor maintaining the zeh0i
SYSTEM WHAT Iney haze gIxen h
been given gruaEIngIy and win h
Efaee. They have manifested !
sympathy 18th he desires 0I ii
people for improved school fneIlIIIe
Whatever differences my naH
arisen between he sehonI noaT
nd the County Commissioners. J
u he exact policy i b puraua
Usrz and there. HeT. ~. u en-
HUIsT - preclude settlement 81
reasonable IazIa. They should naz
len settled an1 could Iaxe bee
settled. I'D there been aIsp0aIII1
. adjust len N he narI oI i
Commissioners. Instead. - far :
or observation Eoea. there has bee
: purpose u anIagonIze the pr
ETam Ior school UeIIermanI II
ZI6n = HhIII The responsibility !
bringing Ne whole InIng . ! mi.
.sHusIn.ss principles n the enn1n
q IIeHH afIaITa. would have TON
Reasonable adjustment 81 -. Il
IeranG.H = oIZnIon y policy.
there h. been : genuine 1ezIHe
aeTxa Ina public Interests md !
public schools. nc lazE oI ne
principles nd IaeE q IIIz 1aaII
re = 6IaInH IoT he muIlIe Il N.
= ~ II11 ourselves. Re H9ra
naH - doubt. = 10 meantime. :
|a.L zIIeKz nnI ID he increase
-. 80 - =. = .H8z.IH H.sz -