Norwich bulletin., 1919-09-20
DANIELSON AND PUTNAM NEWS
PUTNAM


 Three uncontested divorces were granted, motions heard and denlurrers argued and other business transacted at Friday mornings session or the SUI perior court. Judge Frank p. flames, , , day Of the September term, and at tracted an array of counsel. Judges Haines directed that the jury be called in for next Tuesday, when cases are assigned for trial. The first case for Tuesday is that of Byron M. Lewis vs. Hugh German. For Wed nesday the case is that or Arthur u. Lapsley vs. William E. Dunn and TOT the first case on Thursday the assign n1ent is Harold P. Stone vs. James Riley. The second case assigned for i Thursday is that of Wasyl DzWoncyk ! vs. Lyman Seplowitz.
 4 demurrer was argued Friday in ] the case of Bridget Ainswortll vs.
 represented by Attorney s. L. Torrey. was executor of his fathers (Patrick Kangley) estate. and the plaintiff for compromise settlement with oth- CT heirs the executor concealed the fact 1 that there was a deposit in the Put nam Savings bank, of $1.o17.50, which, they allege, was part of Kangley's es- 1 tate, and that they received only *40o, I one quarter Of the amount kangley 1 had on deposit in a savings bank in l Webster. and accepted that as their l lu1 SltAIC l It was stated that the amount on l deposit in the Putnam bank was in the i name Of the executor. who claimed 1t l as his ovn-
 Attorney c. E. searIs. representing 1 the plaintiffs is seeking to secure for i his clients one quarter of the amount ] on deposit in the Putnam Savings | Bank. Judge Haines reserved deci- ] sion.
 Judgment for s1so.e1 was given for the plaintiff in the case Of the Federal i Grocery company of Worcester vs. Abraham Mintz. formerly engaged in business in this city. The company has sold Mintz five bills of ~oods totallins ] in value s34o.21, Jacob Cutler. a mem Der Of the Federal Grocery firm testi fed. Mi1tz had made three payments. totaling $50. against this account, and then one day had called the Worcester firm over the telephone ana asked them to place an attachment on his stock of goods in Putnam, so they longed continue the business. This ! was done. Attorney H. c. Bradfor ap peared for the plaintiff corr pany. Counsel also arzued 2 demurrer in town of I1iIlinely. as told in the Dan ieison news this morning.
 Mrs. Ida NJ. Wallis of PIainHeId, formerly of this city, was granted a aivorce from Charles A. Wallis. aiso formerly of Putnam Mrs. Wallis charged that her husband deserted her more than three years ago. after lie had indaised in heavy drinking for long time. The couple were mar red in Putnam about II years ago sirca her husbands departure Mrs. Wallis has supported herself. YritI, the assistance of her son by a former. i,19 -ria re. Water A. Brown, Of Plain ft!5. Mrs. Florence Carpenter of Ean-egan ard Lena PeIlev Of Paw. ] tucket were witnesses for Mrs. Wallis. as was her son. Walter. The di-
 v"-ce was allowed the ground of de esertion. Mrs. Wallis was rAp-cSaia -H
 ed by Attorney 4. c. B;II of Daniel
 son.
 Mrs; Mariorie E. Miller. of Wood
 stock Valley told of abusive trea t,7,en+
 to which she had been subjected by het
 husband, ArtIUr L. Miller and of how
 he had heatsl her until 1aer feef, va s
 br'i 'sed and her body lamed. She was
 allowed cecree on the ground of
 Mrs. Miller testified that she va
 married t71 August. 1915. and went to
 Soltthh bridge. to live in her newly fur
 nished home. MiJlcr's Urea tr1ent CT her
 part of this year that she finally left him. about Ea ster time and Ietur71s,,
 to her hone in Woodstock Valley.
 where she has since r.ade her home who testified in her daughters behalf ! as did 3 naval officer J:e,teDaI3r | Francis r. Martin. L. S N.. a reIa- 1 tiFe of Mrs Miller's. Mrs. Miller was given custody of child born of be,. marriage. Attorrev c. L. Torrev v-ss counsel for Mrs. Miller.
 On the ground of assertion, s;- Lcrce was granted Adv-iItla BibeauIt of l Nillmantic, formerly Of this cit7, where she married in 1so1 Emil Bi Mr -(raldraips o~+,.1o - .,.