The daily star-mirror. (Moscow, Idaho) 1911-1939, 1919-03-12

| ~
| College of Agriculture. .. 175, ,290
College of Engineering . 1885
: School of Forestry y.......... 1920
College of Law. 1920
School of Mines es............ 1876
| Summer School .. 10000
Administration ......... 1925
| General expenditures ...... 1920
| Operation and repairs. ..... 8S,865
| Experiment Station . 5S 900
| Capital Additions-Buildings 74,361
Total s7s7, ,34s
Federal Appropriation $4,000
Federal Endowment ......... 206 900
Local income (not including
Experiment Station) ..... 10000
Total $4o6 900
Recommended by Board for
legislative appropriation ..S411, ,349
Extension in Agriculture and
and Home Economics ..... $286,9
Less Smith-Lever Federal fund 46,943
Recommended by Board for
legislative appropriation. 100000
Grand Total ............. $651 ,349
The Latah county delegation won
a reputation for ability and unity DUR
ing the session, if one may judge from
reports published in the newspapers
and from legislators from other coun-
ties. The Latah delegation secured
many concessions and introduced and
secured the passage of many bills of
special interest to Latah county and
the entire state. The following claims
for Moscow firms which had been be-
fore previous sessions, were allowed
by the legislature and the money. due
for eight or 10 years will be paid.
The bills for the relief of Moscow
firms or citizens which were passed
by the legislature follow:
H. B. No. 1872, by Hugo, Anderson,
Carpenter and Garfield ld-Appropriat-
ing $2157.55 for relief of w. A. Laud-
er.
H. B. No. 1874, by Hugo, Anderson,
Carpenter and Canfield-Appropria
ing $324995 for relief of Standard
Lumber company at Moscow.
III. B. No. 1874, by Hugo, Anderson,
Carpenter and Garfield Appropriate
ing s1174.77 for relief of Moscow
Hardware company. CThis and two
previous claims cover materials fur
nished in construction of building
at the state university in 1905 and
19O6)
Following is a list of bills intro
duced by the Latah county delegation
which became laws. These were in
troduced by the house delegation. con-
sisiting of Messrs. Hugo, Anderson
and Garfield.
H. B. No. 145-Defining a legal
H. B. No 149-Providing for reas-
sessments by state board of equaliza-
ton and board of county commission
erS.
H.B. No 211-Investigation of wa
ter and power sites.
HI. B. No. 213-Fredatory animal
law.
H. B. No 214-Fish and game bill.
H b. No 215-Lewiston library law
books to be loaned to law department
If the university.
H. B. 216-U. S. Constitution judg-
nents to be filed in counties affected.
Important for Latah county.
H. B. No. 218-Assessments for
main trunk highway.
H. B. No. 225-Authorizing addi-
ional street improvements.
H. B. No. 257-Building and Loan
Associations.
H. B. No. 264-Appropriations for
council of defense.
H. B No. 22-Appropriation for
county agents.
H. B. No 1S2-Relief of w. A. Laud-
r.
H. B. No. 1S3-Relief of Standard
lumber company.
H. B. No. 1S4-Relief of Moscow
hardware company.
H B. No 3S-Relief of First Nation
i Bank.
H. B. No. 193-Herding stock in
highways.
Fl. r. No. 46-Memorial for soldiers.
The following bills. while not intro
uced by the Latah county delegation,
we're supported unanimously by it and
hey became laws, the Latah county
elegation taking an active part IN
heir support They follow:
S. B. No. 131-Recodification OF
chool laws.
S. B. No. Regulating practice
f dentistry.
Fl. B. No. 23S-Road budget.
H. B. No. 274-$2, 100000 for roads.
H. B. No. 273-Educational institute
appropriations.
H. B. No. 275-Deficiency-