The Morning Tulsa daily world. [volume] (Tulsa, Okla.) 1919-1927, 1919-04-21

or which ls entirely and vitality IN
.irrCated in the dOInga and the we'll
being Of every member Inc "fbh
mcnt that immigration Is don"Huo
and not an international question u
lu certain sense true but II ~
question that may endangcT ihe
rr.,rl Of the world: may disturb tho
good understanding between ma.
lons ,upon which peace depends
and therefore. falls directly w!Lhih
tn~ grant ~ power contained IN
article . and article 10, which Whi
be hereafter reviewed..
In "A certain sense, as we have sald
% is true that immigration Is purey
a domestic question FOR instance
Ihr United states may determine lor
lthelf not to admit imiuigrdnls from
Auy nation and this would be purely
a domestic question against Whl,h
no complaint could righfully DO
made by any nation. 1t might de
icrmlne To admit all Immigrants ~
from All nations and in huch case
thorG would be no ground or com
pialut unlegs discrimination should
br made against immigrants from
different COuntriea after their al b.
mission Hut when immigration ~
pcrmitird from some CountricS ana
denied "a to othcr when nationals
of some powers are admitted 10
privileges in the United Statcs and
Other nationals denied su c h
privileges. a question Of dlscrimlna-
ton a. once ariscs, likely TO endhnE"r
"thc good understanding oIiating be
tween nations on which depends the
/ peace uf the, world
An nations, including tho United
| states. arc anxious 20 have their ma
| t.OnalA residents In other nations re-
! Cclve the same privileges and rights
AS tho nationals OF all other powers
! n ltaly. or France, or any other
| power should admit immigrants
/ from all nations except tho United
/ States provide FOR the naturalization
/ OF such Immigrants, their admlHion
! TO the schools OF such nation. their
| right 10 own land and 10 contract
marriage with tho nationals OF such
/ country, and TO engage in business
and deny such privileges To the
/ citizens Of tho United States IL u
not at once evident that the United
Statcs would not submit to Suct
treatment 20 such discrimination. oN
ccpt over it's protest.
Danger Immpcnt.
/ And II such protests were not heed
cd, Il would resort to rcmliator'
MEASURES, and this would endAngc
tho good undc rstanding between thu
| United Statca and such offcndinl
nation and might in the long run re-
suit IN war. and. Conseducntly. be
question under the juriSdiction an
subject 10 the iuycstiFation and de
cislun Of the executive council o
body Of delegates but. In addition Il
all this. tho United States has a treat
with Japan by tho provisions %
which tho nationals OF Japan ca
immlgratc to the United States il
the same manner and enjoy the same
rights AS tho nationals OF other ma
tions. and the reason now that TN
United States Is not subjected 10
flood OF japanese immigration an
It's Conscque Cheap labor. * IN
So-callcd "gentlemens agreement
between the United states and Japa
by which Japan has undertaken I
control and regulate the immiErntio
OF It's nationals TO the United Satci
This being so. It is at once eviden
that the rights OF Japan under thi
treaty, tho rights OF her nationals I
como into the United states. to be
como naturalized citizens OF IN
United States, to contract marriag
with the nationals df the Unite
states, to own land in the Unite
States and 60 engage In all kinds {
, labor In the United States is founde
4 on and arises out OF the treaty; an
r in a subsequent article OF the lcaEu