Norwich bulletin., 1919-09-27
SHORT CALENDAR SESSION
 OF SUPERIOR COURT

With Judge Joel H. Reed, presiding, the first short calendar session of the Sept em Der term of the superior court was held Friday in New London The as follows:
 Barnes vs. Bonvouloir. Bond for prosecution fixed at SIS in two weeks. Massey vs Massey Disclosure of de Karlewitz vs. Szabo, ct al Disclosure of defense. if any: pleadings ordered in three weeks. If no defense. Judg- ment of foreclosure and limitation Of time for redemption went off the list. G. A Comeau vs. Shore Line Electric Railway Co. Default for failure to plead; pleadings ordered in two weeks. L. Comeau vs: Shore Line Electric Railway Co Default for failure to plead pleadings ordered in two weeks. Raikcowski vs. Manchester. Default fo rfailure to plead went off the list. Moran. Adnr. vs. Bradford, Admr. De- fault for failure to plead; pleadings ordered in two weeks. Pierce vs. Koch Permission to file answer and counter clain answer ordered in two weeks. Winifred Price Chadwick vs- Charles Cha dwick. Order for answer or that case be heard as uncontested; answer ordered in one week. Julia F. Sullivan vs Robert J. Sullivan. Second order of notice. was granted. Library Bureau vs Groton Iron Works. Disclosure of defense. Hearing in damages and judg
 ment were postponed Wilkinson. ct al vs Dorsey. Jr., Erx.. ct al. Dis closure of defense, went off the list. T-apointe vs' Raymond & Alexander Lumber Go. ct al. Argument of de- n-urrer: judge took the papers. Dolan vs. Sweeney. Motion for writ of scire facias again Edward M. Sweeney, Vino. Non-suit for failure to reply wentoff the list. Law vs. Carke, ct al Bond for prosecution; s75 in three weeks or justification. Paracenti vs. Paracenti Reply or non suit went off the list. Knowles vs. Douglass ct al. Disclosure of defense or foreclosure was postponed. Slosberg vs. The City of Norwich. Default for failure to rlead; pleadings ordered in ten days. Gates vs. Geer, ct al. Argument of de- fnurrers and motion to expunge; judge took the papers. Horenstein vs. Gold berg. alias Hendel. Motion for a judg- nent for defendant on the ground that it has been agreed by the plaintiff to discontinue the case in respect to the first count and that a demurrer to the second count was sustained January 1e, 1917, and no further pleading has been made by the plaintiff and mo ton for leave to file an answer to th first count were postponed Kessler vs. Sokoy. Request that default be opened and defendant permitted to file answer was granted. Flora Miller vs Olin F. Miller Reply or non-suit: pleadings ordered in two weeks. Mer chan vs. Mohegan Cotton Mills Go. Application for order authorizing the sale of property and franchise was postponed. Edna K. Mcdonald vs. Samuel Mcdonald, case was ordered on uncontested list for failure to plead. Saunders, ct al. vs. New Eng land Coliapsib1e Tube Co. ct al. ap- peal from Compensation Commission CT Judgment was postponed. United States Steamship Go. vs. Groton Iron Works. Hearing npetition of Alfred H. Ackers for surrender of property, etc. was set for October 7th. Room berg Mfg. Go. vs. Uncasviile Mfg. Co. Default for failure to plead; p1eadines ordered in two weeks. Douglas vs. Fl. R. Douglas, Inc. Receivers report ap- prova1 of claims. dividend, and allow ance for reciver and attorneys were postponed. Beckwith, Adn1x vs Da- wis. Default for failure to plead; eadings ordered in two weeks. Chas O. Charbino vs. Bue}ah P Charbino Second order of notice was granted
 The assignments were made as fol- lows: . SszSgHN
 Tuesday, Sept so-Daly ct al. vs. Enright. conservator, appeal from pro- bate Massey vss Massey.
 Wednesday, Oct. Bullock vs Bull lock. Schaprowe vs. Schap Spicer vs. Spicer.
 Thursday Oct. 7-Robertson. adnx.. vs- Woodwork. Main vs- Main. exr, Carnegie Trust Go. vs. Ely ct all, Black vs. City of New London.
 Wednesday, Oct S-Reyburn vs. Reyburn.
 Tuesdya. Oct. 14-Ramsey. adm. vs. OaEidson ct al.