The daily Gate City and constitution-Democrat. (Keokuk, Iowa) 1916-1922, 1919-11-07
Frank Greenough Says Ono was Is'
sued Against His Property WIN
out Reasonable Cause and
Wants Damages.
Is A PARTNERSHIP SUIT
Fort Madison Greeks Figure in Action
for an Accounting-Promissory
Note Suit is
Filed.

Frank Greenough has filed suit
against the River Smelling ana he-
faning company and G. ID. Schoi,'
charging that search warrant Wnich
was issued was without propapie
cuase. and he asks the court TOT
$4,000 damages.
The petition alleges that Mr. Scnoli
acting for the defendants, swore ous
an information for a search WARRANT
and that under said warrant the per
son, property and house OF the plain
tiff was searched and that nothing
was found.
The plaintiff states in the petition
that this warrant being issued was
known by his neighbors and rrlends
and that on account Of 1t they were
lead to believe the plaintiff was
thief and that the finger OF scorn
was pointed toward his family. He
further says that the complaint TOT
the search warrant was false anu
malicious and without prooaple
cause, and he asks for damages OF
$4,000.
Partnership lnvof'ed-
A suit has been filed IN the dlstrlct
court in which Dan Agolopos Is the
plaintiff and Alex Gregorius and Gus
Btefas are the defendants. The con-
troversy is over partnership shoe
shining establishment At Fort Madl-
son in which the plaintiff alleges ne
has not receives his proper snare OF
consideration and he asks the court
chat the partnership be dissolved and
that a receiver of the property,
rights and good will OF partnership
BOSE of the same and plaintiff asks
for distribution of this property m
germs of the agreement of the part
anership.
1t is alleged in the petition that in
january, 1919, a partnership between
he plaintiff and the DEFENDANTS was
sntered into for the purpose or con-
aueting a shoe shining parlors at Fort
Madison, and that under these ar
engagements the plaintifr was to bon
.ribute $3.50. Plaintiff Alleges that he
md the defendants were to- cooper
tie in caring for the business and
hat one-half of the net profits or
he place were to be hrs.
The petition states That the plain
if and defendants have a lease on
property at 826 Second street, Fort
Madison, and have there a stock of
merchandise and shoe SHINING equip
nent. 1t is alleged that in August
;919, the defendants took exclusive
possession of the partnership, books
nd stocks and property and have
iver since prevented the plaintiff
rom access to the same. These are
he causes which the plaintiff states
% wants an adjustment for by the
curt
Promiesory Note Suit.
Gottlteb and Marie Hills have sued
ulia H. and Charles Buss for S798.76
9TH interest from November 6, 1919,
nd have asked for a foreclosure of
Mortgage and sale OF defendants
property to pay this debt.
The petition states that the defend
nts gave the plaintiffs their promis-
DRY note for $500 dated July 6,
GIT. due one year after date and
aat defendants also executed mort
age on property on the corner Of
finth and Fulton streets to secure
ayment Of said note. Plaintiffs al
sge in petition that the defendants
greed to pay the taxes as provided
Y terms of the mortgage, and that
ney failed to do SO ana that the
laintlffs were compelled to pay
1896 delinquent taxes on property.