Evening journal., 1919-09-16
dren's board II she would leave him.

drens board II she would leave him.
The marriage OF Richard Startling,
Negro. and Fannie Starting was an
nulled on application OF the husband.
Starting, who was represented by Judge
Churchmsn, said that he learned, short
~ after his marriage, in Media, In 1903,
| that his wife was already married.
When the case OF Bessie Smith
against Walter ]. Smith was called, the
defendant announced his intention OF
contesting It, The case, therefore, was
continued until later IN the term. when
all contested cases VIII be heard.
After twenty years Of married life,
her husband, Henry A. Griffenberg, left
her I'M 1909. Mrs. Lulu NJ. Griffenberg
testified. She was married In Chicago
in 1889. In 1898 they came TO this city,
and her husband deserted her in 1909.
She was granted a decree nlsi
Henry r. lssaacs was attorney for
Mrs. Grlffenberg
on grounds OF desertion. Allan +.
Davis was granted decree nisi from
Viola VI. Davis. His wife left him on
November 4. 1916. He was represented
by Mr.. Isaacs.
-NtNApH Ls DAut d1hiu iNi a utAltt
from Sara l.. Blue on grounds Of deser-
iion. They were married January rs,
1905. and Mr. Blue is said TO have left
her husband in June 1917, lie was
represented by Harry p. Joslyn. The
case was continued for further evil
dence.
on grounds OF desertion, Emily p.
Everson was granted decree from Al
bert c. Eyerson. She was represented
by Caleb r. Buchinal
Everson deserted his wife I'm 1916 and
went TO Newark
A decree was granted Lille NJ. Brad
dock from Albert B. Braddock on
grounds OF desertlon and habitual
drunkenness. She was represented by
David ]. neinhardt
Mr. and Mrs. Braddock were married
I'm June 1893. Braddock deserted his
wife IN 1917. Life with him was I'M
boarable because Of his excessive drink
ing, Mrs. Braddock said.
George NJ. Bailey asked for a decree
from Margaret NJ. Bailey on statutory
grounds. They We're married In June,
1913. and lived together until November.
1916. lie was represented by NJ Rein
hardt. The case was continued for
further evidence.
Joseph +. Blockson was granted
decree from Della May Blockson.
In Court Room No. T. before Judge
Conrad, I'm the case OF Virginia b. Nor
gan, vs.. Norris G. Morgan. deserlion
was alleged. Philip l.. Garrett repre-
sented the plaintiff In this case. de- !
serlion took place following the dlscOv- |
cry Of a letter In the defendants coat |
pocket. Decree nisi was granted.
Extreme cruelty and deserliOn were |
charged in the case Of Mary a. Clark |
VS.. John @. Clark. The plaintiff was
represented by w. l.. Adams Mrs |
Clark charged hei' husband with threat
ing TO do bodily harm. The testimony |
was corroborated by several witnesses |
\ decree .nlsi was granted by Judge |
Conrad.
In the case of Lucy A. Grimes VS. ]
William II. Grimes, on the charge Of /
desertion, a decree nisl was granted |
James w. Lattomus represented the
plaintiff.
In the case Of Irving II. Brinton vs..
Ethel n. Brinton. a decree nisl was
granted The grounds were desertion.
J. Frank Ball represented the plaintiff.
Brinton's wife left him after they were
married seven months.
Desertlon was charged In the case Of
Fora McRight vs. Frank p. Mcnight |
Edmund S. Hellings represented the |
plaintiff Decree nlsi was granted
In the case Of Russell ]. Bonneville |
vs.. Eva Gordy Bonneville. desertlon |
was charged Frank l.. Speakman rep |
resented the plaintiff Decree nlsi was
granted
J. Frank Ball represented the plain
tiff In the case OF Laura u. Leach vs.. !