The Republican journal. [volume] (Belfast, Me.) 1829-current, 1919-01-30
THE REPUBLICAN JOURNAL THURSDAY, JANUARY 80 1919

10y may. january II III
CISCO a court order was secured tell
porarily restraining Gov. William u.
stephens from signing the ratlhcation
OF the amendment 1t was Indicated
that similar action might be taken In
certain other states. 1t was sald at
the office of the California Grape
growers association that such actlon
Is possible in - other states. Inc
states, according to the ASSOCIATION,
are: Arkansas, Colorado, Maine, Ne
vada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon,
Utah, Washington, Missouri and Ne
braska.
In these states, it was said, all legls-
latiye actions can be, under the law,
referred to the people, and that IN
many of them the people have ~ DAYS
III Which to take a referendum.
Anti-Saloon League.
The dry side of this legal PROPOSE
ton is thus set forth by the Antl-Sa-
loon league:
Article V of the federal Constitu-
ton provides that the legislature or
a state convention is the only BODY
which can ratify an amendment to the
Constitution. Congress is given the
power to say which one shall have the
authority Congress had chosen the
state legislatures as the bodies to ratl-
~ the federal prohibition amendment.
state referendum therefore would
be illegal ana void"
The Anti-Saloon League of America
has probably had more to do with
bringing about prohibition then any
other one agency. 1t was founded in
1898 and is nonpartisan and nonsec-
tartan. Its purpose is the eXtermlna-
ton IF the beverage liquor traffic. 1t
is coalition of the Anti-SalOon
League of the District of Columbia,
the Anti-Saloon League of Ohio and 40
other national, state and local tenn
perance bodies. 1t has branches in
all states. 1t is expected to have an
active part in providing legislation for
the enforcement of prohibition under
the eighteenth amendment.
1t is possible that the vets may also
attack the legality of the action of
congress. By some the view is held
that the amendment was not properly
submitted to the states by congress;
that it was adopted by two-thirds Of
quorum present and voting, whereas
according to the Constitution it should
have been adopted by two-thirds of all
members elected. If the resolution
submitting the amendment were to be
declared unconstitutional it would lead
to much questioning. for virtually all
of the amendments to the Constitution
have been adopted by a two-thirds
vote OF the members present rather
than q tWo-thirdS vote of all members
elected to congress.
Amendments of the Past.
The first national prohibition
amendment was proposed by Senator
Il. W. Blair of New Hampshire as
early as 1876. 1t provided for the
prohibition of the manufacture, sale,
importation and expectation of spirit
Gus distilled liquor for beverage pur-
poses. tie Introduced such bill nine
times between 1876 and 1896; in 1886
he changed it to include all alcoholic
liquors.
Senator John D. Works of Cllifor-
MIA introduced into the senate in 1914
a bill providing for the prohibition OF
spurious liquors, excluding wines and
beers. 1t received no support from
the national prohibition advocates.
December IS, 1918, Co" gresham
Hobson OF Alabama introduced the
famous "Hobson resolution" The
original resolution placed the enforce
ment Of the law in the hands of the
7atiOnal government. but it was SO
amended as to divide the responsible
ity between the state and federal gov
ernments, in order TO secure the sup
port of certain advocates of states
rights The original resolution was
amended eight times by HObson him
self and was finally voted on Deem
Der %, 1914 receiving 1877 votes, 258
being necessary to carry through the
house. 1t never came to a vote in
the senate.
When Does Prohibition Prohibit?
Senator Morris Sheppard of Texas,
author of the amendment, holds that
national prohibition will go into effect