Estancia news-herald. [volume] (Estancia, Torrance County, N.M.) 1912-19??, 1919-06-19
DISTRICT COURT
PROCEEDINGS

"AA, NSSiCCu CIldO pldlllIlll Wa
entitled to property replev
ined, and may retain same, ant
he and his bondsmen released
defendant to have and recover
$500 pasturage money; tha'
plaintiff have costs from de-
fendant except cost of his wit
nesses in excess of four.
N. Howard Thorpe VS.. Lite
Townsend, ct al; decreed that
plaintiff take nothing by this
suit and that defendants Lite
Townsend, E. G.. Hills and Max
H. Montoya go hence without
day and recover Of the plain
tiff their costs to be taxed by
the clerk. Plaintiff excerpts.
A. P. Oliver VS.. William
Winkel, set for trial July 2S.
Neal Jenson VS.. Cleofes Ro-
nero, set for trial July %.
H. G. Williams VS.. M. D. At
kinson, set for trial July %.
A. P. Oliver VS.. William
Winkel, R. C. Dillon, A R. Ce-
Gil and Arnaud Ardans, set for
trial July 20.
Willie Elgin VS.. William
King, set for trial July 20.
j.. N. Underwood VS.. F. G..
McCabe, set for trial July 80.
Lucas Zamora VS.. Saturnino
Lueras, Eugenio Sanchez and
Candido Padilla, set for trial
July 80.
Eulogia Dunbar VS.. Guy
Wallace, set for trial July 81.
Francisco Chavez VS.. D. j.
Bigbee, set for trial July 81.
Elias Tabet VS.. G. M. Quin-
tana, set for trial August /.
j. A. Beal VS.. V. S. Cavins,
set for trial August /.
Hasterlick Bros. VS.. Estancia
Savings Bank, set for trial Aug
ust 1.
j. E. Hinman VS.. Finley Da-
Wis, set for trial August 2.
G.. G. Woods VS.. w. S.
Steele, set for trial August 2.
Stockmen's Guarantee Loan
Co. VS.. Lou V. Colbaugh, ad-
ministratrix of estate of A. w.
Colbaugh, set for trial August
4th.
T. R. Snodgrass VS.. Guaran-
tee Loan Co., ct al, set for trial
August a.
Sylvestre Romero VS.. Epi-
fiano Chavez, dismissed on
ground that no transcript has
been filed.
Antonio Salazar VS.. Alfredo
Montoya, judgment for plain
Tiff on note for $3.50 and inter-
est at 8 per cent from March
|, 1919, until paid; also for
S240 damages for failure to de-
liver alfalfa as per written :
with interest from
December 9 at 6 per cent un- /
Ill paid. Defendant excepted If
and gave notice of motion for !
'ehearing. s
George w. Pope VS. J. R. {
Smith, decreed. 1st: That said {
plaintiff take nothing by
'eason of his complaint, and t
hat same is dismissed at plain I
iff's cost; End: That defend {
mt take nothing by reason of
lis cross-complaint, same dis /
missed at defendants cost; !
'rd: That defendant have +
Judgment against plaintiff and
lis sureties on his cost bond t
or costs incurred by him, ex- i
,cution to issue. (Tried by t
Judge Holloman.) &
Emilia Peia VS.. w. A. Sell q
ers, decreed that COW in ques- I
ion worth $50 be delivered by t
defendant to plaintiff in 80 ,
lays; or if not so delivered, g
Judgment for $50 and costs, G
With execution; execution for S
;osts only if COW is delivered t
md accepted. {
Sosteno Torres VS.. Sheridan !
OeVaney, dismissed on motion 6
If plaintiff, costs to plaintiff.
Willie Elgin VS.. Viterbo An &
aya (now deceased) and Be-
atrice Anaya, plaintiff ad- {
Judged to be owner of land in S
question, writ of possession to /
ssue therefor.
Abran Mirabal VS.. T. S.
injunction continued in
force until further order of S
court. {
State VS.. Narciso Gomez, de- {
,endant sentenced to four
years in penitentiary and $500 {
line, both suspended during
good behavior at discretion of &
court. L
Arnaud Ardans VS.. Frank {
Keehn, verdict for plaintiff for S
S1613.20, execution to issue; {
defendant to take nothing on
1is counter claim.