The Lancaster news. [volume] (Lancaster, S.C.) 1905-current, 1919-03-21

VI hdii oDpoSCu W
an extra session. Look at the ap-
preparation bill and the levy attach
ed thereto and we must see that We
have for one year done enough dam
is that with mature thought next
session, some legislation will be en-
acted He does not think there
could be agreement at this time.
Mcmillan, Charleston: Votes
"Yes" for extra session and is
equally emphatic as to his belief
that the members would get down
to business Il have no limit" he
be his attitude in trying to unite,
get agreement and compromise diff
ferences.
Num-, York: Opposed to extra
session as he does not believe the
Legislators are any nearer agree
ment than when adjournment was
taken two weeks ago. Failure to
insert the referendum feature pre-
Ntultu pdSSdSC VI ihO '"SN
month, he thinks.
Not With Opposition.
Oliver, Georgetown: Favors an
extra session and feels certain the
members would agree. II am not
an objector" to the good roads is-
sue. he says, and IAN for anything
in reason to get the work started"
Orr, Oconee: Opposed to an ex-
/ lature was in session he was against
"the whole proposition as presented
to the house and l have not changed
my mind" The members would
( not get together.
! Owens. Marlboro: Opposed to ex-
ira session None OF the bills intro
duced suited him, as they were
vicious" and loaded"
Paisley. Spartanhurg: Opposes eX-
ira session. and thinks il doubtful
that the members would get to-
gether If called back. He would be
willing to make reasonable conces-
. SlDnS 10 EPl real l'tuS.
Pcgues Marlboro: Doubts the wis
dom of an extra session and doubts
whether the members would get to-
gcther. A nine and one-half mill
levy and a gloomy outlook for the
future are cited as further reasons,
Preacher, Jasper: Votes for an
extra session and will work and vote
for any good roads measure. He is
Of the opinion that the members
would return with desire to correct
themselves on the good roads issue.
No Benefit TO Many.
Pursley. York: Opposed to an ex.
ira session as "it is uncalled for"
The members would not agree. He
can not put taxes on people, wher
so many OF the people will derive nc
benefit therefrom. He hopes the
governor will not call an extra ses
sion.
Redmon, Calhoun: Opposed tc
extra session. unless good roads leg
islation can be assured lie will
compromise his own preference Il
any extent that will give good roads
Richardson, Greenville: Opposed
TO extra session, but would vote 70
most any reasonable bill which
would allow Greenville and othe,
counties with large bond issue fai
consideration for the roads built o
; being built. He does not think tn
members would agree, if they wer
called back.
Riley Bamberg: Voted for ever
road measure before the house las
month. but is opposed TO an eXtr
session. as he fears no results woul
J be attained He would support mos
any bill, If brought back.
= Wants Mileage Basis.
Rivers. Chesterfeld Favors a
extra session and is of the opinio
!, that the members would unite 1
9 some action for statewide syster
e OF highways. He favors a one mi
y property levy and 5 horse powt
y. automobile license, to be apportiOne
s to each county on the mileage basi
C Russ, Horny: Personally he favol
D an extra session, for he believs no
=, the members would unite on a pla
,s for statewide system of permanel
highways. THE Horny delegatiC
1 is ready to vote for any reasonab
bill" Mr.. Russ says.
n Russell, Berkeley: Favors an e
g ira session, "if anything can be a
complished. Ny people are We