The Richmond Virginian. (Richmond, Va.) 1910-1920, 1919-08-21

LX44ny Oh mSMueIb % ~
w~lL my friend from Tn
ooehea.)"
<h DNleeate Davis and Delegaf
~koa have earned for themselve
r9gult of their earnessness ant
A&e Of tmpaksicncd cloqucnce ant
1toty the sohrfquet OF ..frebrand.'
~ Il the duty OF every county ant
- ~ city representative with I
H. 1tk of inteJliEence to vote down TIM
61Mtton II ii 10 passed. the citiei
l ~ nothing" he said
H thought the counties OF tns
II Ira nhould receive some considera-
- ~ the hands OF the special SEES
N 1e0 of the general assembly.
FOR THE COMMITTEES
0o1eeate Thomas W oxiin, OF Lun
1Aufy. patron OF the Ozlin bill.
M4AtGA provides fnst Ave cents OF the
general property tax OK
&taAn cents be used for construction
Ind maintenance OF county roads.
widowed Delegate Davis.
sTh% purpose Of this resolution re
Naid- ~is 10 Kill the bill designed 10
Efw1 The counties avs cents OF the
& 611seHa, property tax of fifteen cents
He charged opponents Of the bill
With wanting to hog IL all You
&re net sas.s4eisr ne said. with tax
! ing the xato,.~hise tax AID what rev.
enas We dertxNa from tSe Employ lnsH az
g convict Ianer. esf yoa no~ ~Ant 70
s1urthsr rob as
s neise&te Hsschen INTERRUPTED TIE
~ stkatss frssrs L@seabGrE 10 argue
tE1s the cay result % the CxGn bill
Noas8 re to impose 81 S4a'N@oh@A faA
&C. re pe~24s es Virginia tns yeAF
Wse1 f1e ssFEN eFf&t59h assN1 h9' S
1os sNsS5es ss @sea ENtt1 n"st seas.
Ise sEssssssT agrees ~s.a tae as
fscrs asanckr eiSy tat ne nf7pe.
srasesSsa-e T. se.a@w ~oa.d Se 20 tef
rs 4ssAs ssssf@A Asse u o'F i@Ns
SeT sns s%~-tSss
tst 1f5ssSs@ tr@11 L~@resA 21F vas
ss2 s-es ~EAs tae SEX sssaS-@~s
EassS ~ %o-a3 l0s 80
44 fse<%ss&& Ee re seG3e1s91@ 81 t"V
Esssxase TIE s-@TseFss's7S tAAs eae sAA"
yxss-s - - ca&@ssss % tee sfAfs a.
-sx1y 1-e F,es7f4&-1toes VIII axes
sNs Ss8tEsse FROM Roanoke clty, ara
1trsrE TIE ~e&1 AZ rs o@31g ns'F Per
Ne1t .t2*rAs $50 f4IrET-Ee4T Per ce1s
@srFkss AZ a~s sixteen Fssr cent county
FAX wS-t@& g Know 4 Ire ee1egate
.sr'-Es L.&ra~nezFs ts1aEn' mat al ex
fsnts.sSs - ssxtesa cents tor COL
AArax vaxUs received ~as sarcel-soFEae.
~sEAs- Ezss.g - point OF Greer.
rnEGe r. sttoz 10 REFER tae refe5eAon
to fEs e7asratfte@ nn roads ana inter
nal navigation. The notion was de-
fsafe6 by q vote OF IS 70 IS.
Delegate Sorvsa l. Henley, OF VIII
q liamssurg- thought the crucial point
~ the extra session had been reached.
Opposing the ozliu bill. he declared
Il ant ore has 10 crawl before he can
XAtk; that the foundation has to be
Fl 3ompleted before the structure can be
fSAred and that first the grand trunk
I - to be erected before feeders can
SAded
t&slA on his feet. the delegate from
w31sA msburg took occasion to reply
TO Ne criticism of the delegate from
Eorf6tks county who. on Tuesday,
fAyed certain delegates who. although
patrons of certain bills. had confessed
HAT they were not familiar with their
Xrovisions and, when called upon by
nthers for enlightenment as to certain
POINTS. were unable TO comply
LITTLE PLEASANTLY.
+ ANtf1f the delegate from Norfolk county
lad given the subject of roads as much
Thought and study as my friend from
Roanoke city, he would know more
HboHt the subject than he does he
ssaaid
hi s.Then would be as crazy you
Are" was the retort of the delegate
aYrom Norfolk county
THAT may or may not be-" Delegate
nks4enley came back II am sorry that
- have not been endowed with suffi-
srieut mentality to explain all that
might desire to my friend from Nor
ssfnik county"
MT Delegate Robert O. Norris. of Ian
Easter. introduced resolution Askins
sMihe attorney general to render ar
%sSspinion as to the constitutionaiity Of
4s3evyfng tax upon cities and towns
~egcr county aid and passing the ques-
zion by until today I, was defeated
a The debate by this time. had re-
Apoived itself into fight by patrons OF
s4he CxIin bill to Kill the Willis reso-
s~iutiou and the determination OF pro-
ponents of the resolution to deal a
heath blow to the Ozlin bill.
M The country" representatives. who
~@Eere lined up solidly behind the ozlin
@bIll and In opposition to the Willis res
ls-olution, adopted steam roller tactics
(which. after the smoke of battle had
@scleared. were found to have prevailed
Nv Delegate Easley. Of Halifax, declared
that the Willis resolution had precipi-
sg1ateaea very unfortunate situation and
saf,At the useless wrangling was q
waste eff valuable time. He moved
sthat the resolution be referred to the
Eommittee on roads and internal Eavi-
cation until the constitut!onality o1
- n <NakfI- 49,