The Kentuckian. [volume] (Hopkinsville, Ky.) 191?-19??, 1919-07-16
Low SALARIED
SUFFER MOST
Labor Department Complies Sta
tistIcs in Cities That Show
Expenditures.
FOOD and RENT COME HIGH
The Lower Your Salary the Greater
Proportion Of II You Spend for
Food and Shelter, Say In
vestigators.

WashIngton.-The lower your salary.
the greater percentage Of 1t you spend
for food and shelter, according to the
latest government cost Of living inves-
tigation.
Tables complied by labor depart-
ment experts after study Of hundreds
of family budgets show the actual cash
outlay for food and rent is greater in
families with the higher incomes, but
In the average family the expenditures
for these necessities does not Increase
as fast as the income.
In Baltimore, for instance, Is FAM
lies with incomes under 5000 averaged
expenditures Of $382.95 for food and
S12O.44 for rent. The average was 46.5
per cent Of the total income for food
and 14.6 for rent. The families whose
incomes were $500 or more, however.
average 1875 per cent less for food in
comparison with total income and 11.5
less for rent
Showing how much more cheaply
the hgher-salaried families get off in
other cities are these differences:
Pittsburgh, food Is per cent, rent rs
per cent; New York, food 6.7 per cent,
rent III per cent; Boston, food 40
per cent rent So per cent; Syracuse,
food 4.3 per cent, rent 10 per cent;
Scranton, food 81 per cent, rent ga
per cent.
How Spending Varies.
How families of varying incomes
spend them Is indicated by tables
showing average expenditures of diff.
'ferent groups for Philadelphia and
Camden, N. ]. The table deals with
expenditures Of 301 families of seven
different income groups.
Four families whose incomes were
under 5000 a year averaged per year
for food $865.40; clothing, $1OO.S7;
rent, $176.25; fuel and light, $63.O1;
furniture, $15.22; miscellaneous,
$100.52. The average total expendi-
ture per family was $S21.26, and the
average number Of persons per family
49,. Three families in this group re-
ported SURPRISES which averaged $24.39
per family, while one had a deficit Of
s157.35.
Seventy-five families with incomes
Of $500, but under $500, reported
expenditures that averaged for food
S59S.69; clothing, $273.53 rent, $2OO94;
'uel and light, $7566; furniture,
1852; miscellaneous, $4,000. Total
expenditures per family averaged
j ,535.77 for an average number of At
ersons per family. Sixty-two families
nded the year with an average sur
lus of $125.03, nine experienced an av-
rage deficit of $1O3.S1, while four bal !.
need their books evenly.
Study Many Cities.
Eleven families with an income of
$500 or over averaged in their ex-
enditures for food, $914.42; clothing,
476.39; rent, S25O36; fuel and light.
95.18; furniture, $127.33; miscellane-
US, $66A2l. The total average ex-
enditures per family was $2,527.8N 4
Or an average family Of 7.6 persons. +
Ill families reported surplus. The
verage surplus was $409.52.
Similar studies have beeA prepared
y the labor department for groups Of +
representative families in Baltimore,
ostOn. Bridgeport, Buffalo, Chambers
urg, Pa; Dover. N. j.; Fall River,
Lass; Jamestown, N. T.; Lawrence,
lass; Manchester, N. H.; Newark.
!. j.; New York city, Pittsburgh,
ortland, Me-; Providence, r. l. Rut-
and, VT; Scranton, Syracuse, Trenton,
Vestfeld, Mass; and Wilmington,
Sel.