The herald., 1919-10-23
W0ULDL0CAL|z|NC
MEAT TRADE PAY?
Senator Currie, Stock Raiser OF
Nebraska, Makes Ex-
pertinent.

Meat is high; the packers admit 1t.
though they say that other foods are
higher in proportion. The farmer says
he is not getting too much for his cat
tie, in fact not enough, he says. How
about numerous local slaughtering
plants scattered throughout the COM
munities of our country, or more OIL
rect-from-farmer-to- relation
ship?
There is almost sentimental attrac-
tiveness about the thought, like dreams
of ones boyhood home. 1t looks so
simple. Indeed, it is simple after
fashion, and is the way most meat
was handled before the industry grew
to national and international proper
tons. But would it pay?
Tried to Build UP Local Market.
Experimentation and testing Is
doubtless the best teacher. And In
curing minds have not hesitated to
dig into the matter. Senator +. M.
Currie Of Broken Bow, Neb., himself
a stock raiser, relates bit OF expe-
rience Of his own along this line.
He tried for years, he tells US. to
establish a market for fat cattle with
local butchers, invariably finding that
! he could not meet the price made to
them by the packers.
"In other words" he says, "the pack
ers could pay US more for our cattle
on foot, and sell the product to our
local butchers for less money than
they (the butchers) could pay US for
our cattle and slaughter the beef them
selves"
During the fore part Of the present
year he carried his inquiry further. He
shipped two carloads Of cows to
Omaha, and they were sold to Armour
and Company for $3.50 per hundred
weight. Among these was one cow
which he wished to have himself for
beef. This COW weighed $40 pounds
and therefore brought him $66.36. The
animal was tagged and the Identical
carcass was shipped to him by ex-
press to Thedford, Neb., and charged
to him at the prevailing whole
sale price Of such meat on that day In
Kansas City, Omaha and Minneapolis.
The carcass included carrying charges
of about $500, cost him $6O.11, or
$6.25 less than he sold the animal for
in Omaha.
What Cow Would Cost Consumer.
snow" continues the Senator, Sup
pose q consumer in Omaha had or.
dered this meat direct from me, and
had slaughtered the beef at the ranch
and sent the meat direct to the con.
sumer. Taking as a basis the price
received for this COW in Omaha, $685.
less the freight Of 171A cents per hun
dred, it would make the cow worth on
the ranch $65.OO."
To this $500 he adds $500 fol
slaughtering at home and $500 for e1'
press from Thedford to Omaha, and
he deducts 500 credit for the hide
According to these figures the
dressed carcass Of his COW would be
worth 5000 in Omaha. as against the
packers price Of approximately $54.OC
(Which is derived by deducting the ex
press charges to Thedford, $500. from
the price the carcass was sold to him
$60.1D.
Cheaper to Buy Than XIII.
"After thorough investigation" thu
Senator says, II am convinced that
1t does not pay for US to slaughter
our own meat at the ranch; that We
would better oship our cattle t.
Omaha, and buy our beef from the
packer. I have been engaged in the
cattle producing business all my life
there is no particular reason why
should be friendly to the packers, but
I am thoroughly convinced I am re
ceiving, and always have received
more for my cattle on foot, than IL
had been able to sell direct to the con
sumer, and consequently the consumer
has been able to buy my product fol
less money through the packer thar
under any other system which 1!
known to business up to the presen
timon