The Barre daily times. (Barre, Vt.) 1897-1959, 1919-10-28

That's all" said Mr. Archibald.
Mr.. Sargent was recalled. He was
shown portion of the glasses and tes-
titled these were imbedded in the hair.
The hair was pushed back and the
nose piece imbedded in the hair. He
was not certain as TO there being any
lenses in the hair He was then shown
picture of the body of Mrs Broad
well and the post was testified to as
being broken over. Also relative to an
alleyway near the shop. He saw tracks
of a team having driven in there and
having turned around recent BY "re-
cent" he meant the morning of the
murder The stenographer took notes
about the tracks
In cross examination by Mr.. Archi-
bald, he showed Mr. Archibald where
the tracks were and that a milk team
could drive through there.
Mrs. Eva Dow.
Mrs. Eva Dow of Barre was called. |
She became acquainted with Harry |
Broadwell at the Bolster block last |
winter. The witness never went to |
Broadwell's to care for Broadwell.
did you ever become intimate with |
himy' Objection by the state was Wig |
orously made, claiming the defense
used Broadwell as a collateral witness
and drew from him denial of any in.
timacy with Mrs. Dow The defense
said it offered to show intimacy both |
before and after Mrs. Broadwells |
death. A conference occurred at the
berch between the attorneys.
Mrs. Dow was excused for the time
being, following the conference
Lizzie Manning.
Lizzie Manning, of Barre, and was |
living there last May. She recalled May
3 and was living at the corner of Main
and Seminary streets. She is employed |
at the laundry She called on Mrs.
Houghton ON Summer and Elm street
corner. She went home between and
2:l5 o'clock Sunday morning, going
down Summer street. She saw an au-
tomobile in the little alleyway by the
blacksmith shop, meaning the pathway
leading from Summer street to the
laundry. She heard voices. There was
another automobile farther down on
Summer street on the other side. She
could not tell what was said. She could
not tell whether it was back of the
shop She thought there
were more than two persons talking.
She saw other persons on the street,
but saw no other automobile. The state
only inquired as to the turn in the
as il approached the laundry
Mrs. Ethel BrOggi.
Mrs. Ethel Broggi of Barre, whose
husband died year ago, was living at
3S Pearl street on May 3. She was a
telephone operator on that date and
had been an operator off and on for 10
years. On May she worked from 10
to l0:30 P. m. and from IL to 7 a. m.
She went to work at II O'Clock. She
was accompanied by Alfred Morgan
and Dorothy Marion, the former a rel
ative of hers. She saw someone coming
out OF the Arcade building when she
was going to work. They were coming
out of the alleyway. She could not tell
how many. They were male persons.
She did not hear them say anything.
Her place of work Is in the Rowland
block, at the corner of the building.
On the back side She relieved Gertrude
Dale about u o'clock. They were
alone, Miss Dale retiring, but May 8
Miss Dale did not go directly to bed.
She heard barking of dogs. The bark.
ng Of dogs was so loud it was unusual.
She went to the window She could see
ler homs from the window She thought
,he dogs were barking in back of the
Buzzell. This barking was about an
1our after she went to work. She
,ould not see anybody or any dog. She
,ould see her home.
There is light near her home. She
lid not recall hearing any automobile
hat night 1t is common thing to see
on Keith avenue at that
lour and later at night. There was a
lance at Rowland hall that night. She
lid not hear an automobile that night.
Defense's Motion for Discharge of Long
0verruled. {
When the state rested its case late !
afternoon, the defense i'm
nediately moved that the respondent .
De discharged on the count of first de-
yree murder, claiming that the state !
iad failed to make out motive such
IS needed in first degree murder in
order to prove premeditation. The
.ourt oyerruled the motion, and the
!efense took exception to the decision
# the court
James r. Wood was the first witness !
N the stand yesterday afternoon dur
ng the closing hours of tile states evil {
lence. He testified that the pictures !
which Ed. Barron saw at Springfield,
Mass, had not been discussed at all
when Barron saw them. It will be i
ecalled from previous testimony that {
Barron denied knowing Long until he |
vas shown a picture, after which he a
That's the guy that / {
oaned handkerchief in Barre" I
The attorney general then offered '
hese pictures as evidence, but the de-
ense objected, so that for time they
we're laid one side. Later in the day
hey were offered, as were all of the ,
'ther exhibits which the state has
hown, excepting the hair, of which
ome testimony had been presented.
The defense made lengthy argument
igainst the admission of the pictures. \
Detective Expenses in Question. G
At this time the state opened the
Ioors for the defense, which resulted y
n some hot words passing between
witness and counsel for the defense.
Ar. Archibald withdrew his objection,
made last week, to the defense cross =
Mr.. Wood upon the expense
cost the state to secure the evil .
Ience in this trial; and cross examina-
Continued on fourth page) /
\