Little Falls herald. [volume] (Little Falls, Morrison County, Minn.) 1889-1950, 1918-03-22
MORE WHEAT IS
Good BUSINESS
State Food Administration Issues
Call for Larger Acreage Both
for Profit and Patriotism.
GAYS WN''|II!!EAT pnlc.r
Besides, a Big Cop Means Backing
the Boys Who Have Been Sent
to the Front to Fight.

to the Front to Fight.
The Federal Food Administration
for, Minnesota is issuing a call for a
larger acreage CT spring wheat It
makes the following statement Of
world needs the basis for the call:
The United States. Canada, and the
Allies (England, Fra~ ce, Italy and Bel
giuzn) in 1917 produced 100000, 900
bushels less wheat than they needed.
Shipping is so limited and SO badly
needed for other products that wheat
cannot be brcUght from more distant
points where there is surplus such
as Argentina, Australia and India. This
has made very rigid economy in the
use Of wheat necessary. It is not likely
the Allies can produce more in 1918
than in 1917 because their production
has continually decreased since the
war began so that in 1917 they pro-
duced 150,000,000 bushels less than
their average production for five years
before the war. If they produce as
much in 1918 as in 1917 they will need
to import between 550,000,0o0 and $780,
100000 bushels to- supply normal de-
mands. The United States is About
$500 miles from England and France;
Argentina is about $500 miles dis
tant; India is about 10000 miles away !;
and Australia 1880 miles It is evil
dent then that if there is any scar
city OF ships, the more wheat surplus
we have in the United States the
better it will be for all concerned.
The Outlook in the United States.
In 1917 the United States produced
about G50,o0OOoo bushels with sur
plus Of about 50,0Oo,oO0 bushels above
own needs. In 1917 the winter
wheat belt produced 41s,ooo,00o bush
els and the spring wheat belt pro.
duced 232.O00,0Oo bushels. The out
look for winter wheat last December
1 indicated a probable yield of 540,-
100000 bushels. It may be more, or
less. At any rate much more
spring wheat will be- needed than can
be produced so that every acre Of land
in the spring wheat belt that is suit
able for spring wheat and that can
be handled reasonably we'll should be
seeded to that crop. It, of course, is
not wise from the standpoint of the
individual farmer to SOW wheat on
land that will produce a materially
better crop Of something else or SOW
wheat on farm not equipped to han.
die the crop econ omcally.
Prices and Profits.
The $2.17 per bushel guaranteed
price for 1918, is high enough to
make the growing of wheat decidedly
profitable with fair crop. It would
seem, in view Of this fact that the
outlook for raising wheat on good
wheat land is as promising as the
outlook for any other crop and be.
sides this, the patriotic appeal to
furnish bread for the millions who
need it, is very strong. It is doubt.
full If the farmers Of the Northwest
can make greater contribution to
their country, or to humanity gener-
ally, than to grow wheat.
Wheat Looks Most Surely Profitable.
It is the opinion Of Andrew Boss,
Vice Director of the Minnesota, Elk
pertinent Station, that wheat looks
like the most surely profitable grain
crop this year. He states: "The high
price of oats and barley at the pres
ent time, however, is likely to bring
an Increased acreage Of these crops at
the expense of the wheat crop. Farm
ers will do well to consider the pos
sibilities Of profit from these crops
before changing the acreage materi-
ally. The average yield Of wheat in
Minnesota for the last 10 year per-
iod was 1875 bushels an acre, at $500
a bushel, which is about the price
that the average Minnesota farmer can
expect to net for this years crop, this
would bring return of s27.00 an acre.
The average yield of oats for the same
period was 30.S bushels. To bring
$27.00 an acre, oats would need to sell
at 87.9 cents bushel this year. The
average yield of barley for the same
10 year period was 1876 bushels. To
bring $1,000 an acre, barley would need
to sell at $1.14 a bushel. While oats
are bringing something over 80 cents
now, and barley is much higher than
$1.14, it is not probable that present
prices will be maintained if normal
crop Of the small grains is secured,
especially If corn should prove to be
good crop. That is why wheat looks
the most surely profitable grain crop.
BARLEY and oats must compete with
corn as a feed crop. Farmers will
prefer to feed corn If It is available.
The consequence will be that barley
and oats will shrink In price more
quickly than wheat. Corn probably
would be keener competitor for