The daily Nome industrial worker., 1918-04-11

Nome Industrial Worker, to-wit:
 |!
 "Our scribe enjoyed the elo-
 quent address of the Hon. Judge
 Holzheimer, while he was deli
 vering his patriotic speech to
 Louis Nashenweng in the Dis
 trict Court room last Saturday
 morning. (Especially the part
 of the lecture which referred to
 the very patriotic guys, who
 wrap the American flag about
 them about once every year). Apparently District Attorney
 Mundy was very sympathetic in
 his attitude towards poor un-
 fortunate Nashenweng. Mundy
 came near shedding an abund-
 ance of crocodile te3rs" whom
 addressing his Honor in regards
 to the severity of the sentence
 which ought to be imposed upon
 MT. Nashenweng, Mu1dy ex-
 pressed his opinion, that he
 great deal and then some more
 if it was necessary, sympathy
 for the accused. He emphatic
 ally stated he didn't consider
 MT. Nashe2werg in the same
 light as he did a professional
 agitator like Bruce Rogers, and
 others similar to him. The
 scribe was inclined for a mom-
 ert to take him seriously, be-
 cause he looked like a real
 man when he was saying it.
 There are professional agi-
 tators and there are prcfosGion-
 al-other things, also.'"
 Attached to said affidavit was a request that an order be issued by the Court for the defendant, Ken nelly to appear and show cause why the judgement of the Court should not be pronounced against him fer the aforesaid alleged offense Judge Holzheimer stated he would not at this time issue such an order. He said that he would let the matter rest until Kennelly's other case is dispoGed of. His Honor cautioned the representatives of both the local newspapers, as we'll as others, to be very careful and not unduly criticize the Court, or any of the Court officials, while legitim- ately performing their duty.
 The stipulation accompanying said affidavit, was in substance to the effect, that the aforesaid squib in Mondays issue. was published with the intent to prejudice citi- zens against him (Mundy) for doing his duty.
 MT. Mundy has not as yet inform ed the public, through the press, or why he considers that he should be allowed any special privilege, which apparently he would deny to other citizens. We would like to know from Mundy, or from any other official, whether an officer of tho Court is doing his duty, fairly and impartially, conscientiously and without bias or pre- judice, when he accused in open Court, one Bruce Rogers, as being ! Professional Agitator, when he Rogers) has a criminal case pend ng, being charged with publishing, pr causing to be published alleged seditious articles. Maybe Mundy would have us believe that he utter ed such a vilifying statement, with the intention of befriending Mir. Rogers.
 We are not from Missouri, never the less we have our doubts about it."
 If branding a citizen as a Pro- fessional Agitator has not tend ency to prejudice some narrow minded boneheads against man, then the little we may have gleaned in days of yore, has amounted to naught.
 We were always lead to believe, that a Democratic form of govern ment, meant, Equal rights to all, and special privcleges to none."
 There is quite e distinction be- tween the defination of prosecution,