Daily Kennebec journal. [microfilm reel] (Augusta, Me.) 1870-1975, 1918-04-17

Boudrou and Sven Lidh, Tor predh-
ing, entering and larceny; state vs..
Alex Dugay land Alfred Dugay;
State VS.. Harry Mari, larceny from
person; State VS.. Jos. Chirelli. apt.
A.. judgment below affirmed; state vs..
Jos. Esself. aplt.; State VS.. BESSIE
Flaherty, aplt.; State vs.. Sarkls Ger
abidi. aplt Several Of the cases
were those which were connected
with the strikers at the Maolson
Wooden Mill. The case of the state
VS.. Peter Gilbert, aplt. for sale or
LIQUOR was mol pressed, also the
cases Of the State VS.. w. J. Hender-
son, aplt, violating game law; DAVID
Murray, aplt, truancy; Geo. W..
Fields, aplt.. assault and battery; VS..
Zacharias Hensby. aplt.. assault ana
battery. The cases continued were:
State vs.. Hector Beurbe, (two).
breaking. entering and larceny; Mar
tin Stafford, uttering forgery; Ed
ward Viguc, Medford Colway and Al
phonso Galway (two), breaking. en-
tering and larceny; Ernest and Jas.
Brown. malicious mischief; Clyde
Monroe, breaking, entering and lar
ceny; Alfred Collins, aplt., non-sup-
port; Linton Irwin. aplt. defacing
school building; John Vollo. aplt.,
search AMI seizure; Manford Galway
and Alphonso Galway three), arson.
continued: Herbert |. Mason, break
ing, entering and larceny; Orie M.
Petley, assaultng officer; Henry
Bagley, breaking. entering and lar
bo
sion; Jas. Williams Queen, illegal
practice oDtometry.
A large number of cases assigned
for trial on the civil docket have
been settled out of court. Included
are: Elmer f. Harris VS.. Geo. Bick-
ford, Nancy f Bickford and S. f.
Bickford. defaulted and continued for
judgment; Fred w. Brooks VS.. Glib
bons. Graham Co. ct ais, defoulted
by agreement; Lee F.. Boardman and
Herbert A. Boardman vs.. Delbert
Parker. Judgment as Of mortgage;
Fred c. Pooer and Mark E. Emery
VS.. The Lewiston, Augusta and
Watervilla Street Railway, neither
party, no further action: John r.
Bean VS.. Nj. c. Lyons. defaulted by
agreement: Oakland Motor Co VS.. J.
r., Florence E. and Irving w. Bean,
defaulted; Ephraim A. Dane VS.. J.
Ralph Bean. dcfaulted by agreement;
The National Fertilizer Co. VS.. Sew
ell Morrill, was defaulted and contin-
ued for judgment; Claudia Wilson
VS.. f. J. Hines and Frank ]. Durgin,
continued Edith E. Whitney vs..
Clyde T.. Whitney, defaulted by
agreement.
Tuesday was a quiet day in SUI
nreme Judicial court The promissory
note case of John r. Bean vs. c. II.
Fernald assigned for trial. was de-
taulted. The case of Fred w. Palm :
er against John W. Freese was not
tried contrary to expectations. At
tGrney II. l.. Smith Of FoXcroft, at
tOrney for Mr.. Palmer, together with
Judge Lawrence of this town, arriv-
ed but the case was not heard by
the jurors. Judgment was rendered
for the defendant, however. with
damages for one cent, no costs. This
was a replevin suit in which an au-
tomobilc was involved. Merrill 6,
Merrill We're the council employed by
Mr.. Freese. Following the DISPOSE
ton of these cases and in less than
Is minutes after Judge Morrill, as
sumed the bench Tuesday morning,
10th juries were excused after be-
lCg thanked by the presiding justice
for their attention during the term.
Divorce cases were then heard by
Judge Morrill,. Ernest l.. Wing of
hi. c
a common laborer, appeared in di-
vorce proceedings against his wife
Ethel Estelle Wing. He was repre-
scented by Harold E. Weeks of Fair
field. He was married in 1903 and
testified that his wife was 16 at that
time and he much older. He main
tanned that his wife had not beer
true to her marriage vows. They
had lived in various localities, in.
Guiding Athens, North Hartland Eas
= Skowhegan and Burnham, since theil
"a marriage. His wife had left hin
re October 20, 1916. and he alleged tina
to she had run away. He maintain:
v three of the six children and she tn,
other three. Constable Frank Whit
ia ten Of Shawmut appeared as a wit
l. ness in his behalf
is The second case was that O
to Ethel NJ. Libby of Skowhegan VS.
Lester II. Libby of Bingham The
at couple were married on September
" 5, 1905. They have three children
Hildred, living with the mother: Har-
old, with the father; and Adrian
with Mrs. Libby's father. The sep
s. aration occurred October. 81, 1917
IN She testified that she had had Mr.
~ Libby arrested for non support anc
1. that her husband was convicted al
II the trial in the lower court. James
W. Gilfllan. drug clerk. testified as
to a recipe for medical prescription
which he had filled for Mr.. Libby, /,
~ was claimed. Mrs. Libby's father
h Adrian Robinson of Windsor appear
n ed in his daughters behalf and stat
8 ed that he was willing to take his
n grandson, who had been living with
Q him. and take care of him. The two
n children were excluded from the
court room during the evidence. VIM.
n Folsom Merrill was the attorney in
y the case. Divorces granted not all
4 ready published will be published
t when Judge Morrill, has signed the
= DEGREES.
l The memorial services for the three
| members Of the Somerset County Bar