Amarillo daily news. [volume] (Amarillo, Tex.) 19??-current, 1918-07-17


elusion. on flo. Instead ~ frenzy nsn you all b'
interested n fhs contents 90 fhis article The writer
4 one uho beIie.. fHH me aferag0 American
voter desire. f0 Of.f matur'lF rnh.lI'f'l bhi'.'
and coryar.rg fu avoid the injustice ni a mis-
ruidad ballot Entertaining these ideas th" writer
thlrts Do nraper Of. discuss some recent features
az the Leslie NohIn. uIHr whIcn have etrii'd mN'"
comment recently h.f without Int correspondents
decrease Boz fha general .lrt OF accurate lhi"fhh
,i.r an tfr suUIr.f DISCUSSIONS Doe tuich men %.
,ylg. ,.Ir..uf .f...lfn Information ~ tho sub.
,srf e.If naturally hI..I hu.f u' mistake "uI'h
rair ,,Idt rIIrrrrr. UH fht tuflurIfF ni that n'I
sn0rtruua s.auH.r.r Ihry Hay. until ihr ihf'a1
Of truth b. Ir .nHr. Hrd iHr whole community
erianrIpf boz ..r.r H..repr's'ni1iifus and hair.
truths have .el mu, good citizens asira} "n 'nH
matter and j.. F. un. fhai plain and simple 'fuih
sbogH have b rI|n. bearing und sober discussion
Tho ar|frr Hst rH objection tu tho public MAX
ms inquiry ufn '.. |.fiI pfopf'y OF mo our
action bod Frlnf.rr fHn defendant now ridL hu'
common fI.rr... demands thBi auF Judgment 600
tho matter should hs .Hsurudrd until iulI 'u.1fm1
lion B.. obfain.I no fhe laW and Facts and since
thIs condition tpH'Ir to boz vnntinr am pu' 2"
mo us...rIf. YI attempting to 600 mo record
straight HsInr. fH. public Boo simple Justice i' mf
self Or 500 Ha.. already formed an opinion ODD
tho matter ur expect fu form such opinion. ih'H
In faIrua.. ta w. before making YOUR opinion
final tnl should r..i carefully what ] hat' p"
fay herein and u. article aIll hr H brief ' 900.
cumstsuc,. v.u permit and al ans rate tho ifn'
that v|I br required POP read mT rrW1fk. "iIi not
b. nearly ao rraHf a. fh. Time great many good
peupI. have ar,rdy .prnf In talking about thi.
matter slthow uri bavlng obtained adequate in
formation o.. ..nfIII fY 1 rational discussion
There ore o. lta people who ar, sllur io Irf
their cont upt and indignation fnr one th'' Boo
liryp guilty ~ fiuf Goo override and Huhnrdi
nate fhrir .,ns. Hf Justice. and they Wiu pro-.
tahIy Glove their mind. Goo ans aftum'ni ou ih'
point. bui most p.upI, du mot f''I ihW me rild
srr... ,. ~ FfHuI should ht substituted lor The
.| Oh zoo raj H
b. BE- gIfh those that wish 200 reason Tor % while
40 fhr outset mHt .1t thai fhIut that much nf
ttr Incorporate I.sDn. sion of thi. mHitrf BIAS pro
c,eiod from failure tu Distinguish between ih"
question of probable guilt and thr matter 90. th"
defendant ueh' to rir and impartial trial lu
other word. pa. proper inquiry Dr. not whether ]
believe is.Iie Nuh''" t1 bc uilfy or whether Won
believe him tu %, guilty hui whether hr secured
that faIr aud Impartial trial guaranteed by yuu. Boo
common with fh' other people nf InSaf. Boo your
constitution and statutes
ln Section I0 o. h, nul of RIGHT. Of your Con
FtituflDn # found thIH solemn guarantee "lu ill
criminal prosecution. thr accused rhtIl have a.
speedy public Trial D., an impartial lur,
NnH assume that most people believe That tho
state of Texas should Weep IH aori ou thH pro.
misc Sou arr nr bbofo Tho funatDI h.Fufu uf
Tho witch burner. uf other years. aud 1m sure
you 10 not approve INTOLERANCE, Boo Huf form. there.
fore you du mot h"li'fU uf frr that simply because
bou believe wRn guilty thnt hr should br denied
th' Constitution uu tho other hand I frrl safe
Boz nHumlnr ih1i you actually fr,l that ryor d.
Jendaui Is "uiiilod tu fhlr trial Dos impartial
jury although bee D. generally believed Zoo hr guilty
Tor Tho simple reason fhIf YOU rctls, that a fair
Trial according 20 tho orderly process of lav be- the
ony safe Way 90 determine whether uo b. boo fact
guilty
Indeed hr question of uuf or Innocence q.
immai'r1l aH rcspc.t iho matter OBJ. e fair and
impartial trfl and 200. manifest proposition D..
Do
Juu. IirIun In tht rf.r uf luuE 81. state 40
Texas Criminal AppH.I Reports 1885, as follows
4 defendant 100 20 criminal prosecution Is entitled
2" % I'f and impariI. 'rl' and verdict cot con.
V'IHr houDrr lusf should ho abut, suspicion
H p" i' fairness and DO. entire compatibility with
ih' Iu.' 'ud pure administration of tHr aN
without pursuing t.. point further q f,el tHat
"' Hf' agreed on ih. proposition f.lf .,srt 200.
,u.'d r'r 900 ha. 'b' r''le.1 word OFF T.as uai
h' .ht'. Httt q f1ii ff..I ht 1000 Impartial Jury .rI
and Chat ~ 81. only f.rht Haf H. should have .fI.n
en fh' only matter uHf q. I.f fur discussion ..
Nh"'h"r I.e'lir Noble dd Boo f,ci hlIo 20 n.r and
impartial ir'l lf h' lIH uo' have such f. trial ,au
viN HFr'. fhsf De- should ht,. h..r rf4rf,.I D., r,,
HH' NoN o. 'h' HU 'rn o." nfh fHa general flr.
mu' 'ha' every accused BE- entitled io IL flir irI4I.
W 900 impartial 1ur nt mIrhf Hr aI odd. iu .,.
coins whether particular trials "rf tHa rrau.r..
M''i "i iifnr H and .mpriaIIN Huf fortunately
Tor mi uH rirruU f.nH. u. fI. I..Hr N.II.t
rf' 'f' rnu''mcd. iH' av f.. .o uaH ..rIei mat
o.. W.h 'fu'p v.1 he encountered and 4 be.
I''e 'H'' fl ihat b. uer,..arr . r.. .ruuaInf fbo
I''p' WIN aHuo point. uf HN fI.f 4r. rftirIv
20 'i %, our CON Nfu.an. statute. and count
4" % Resort bar VH..h ar. NOT matter. af cam
f.H tnua I,If.
fo1 a.' Double oa, eIiu tsss. a pride ir he.
.' ' .f'I.'uF .f'|.H HHI fHHf moan. that
'h.n SON tr' informed .. nI. law .. ,.t,ti..r.t
,"' ''u'.r s"Iu'. ana Appellate
o.. 'N h. t"ar r..araI d...r..