The Belding banner-news. (Belding, Mich.) 1918-1973, 1918-08-21
YOUR SONS LIFE
OR A new SUIT
What II Means II los, 900, 600
People Refuse to Economic
on Clothing.
NATION HURT N MANY WAYS
One Of Numerous Cases In Point Vivid
~ illustrates the Vital Necessity
Of Saving to Save the
Country" In War Time.

Of "SavIno to Save the
Country" In War Time.
BY PAUL M. WARBURc.
Former Vice Governor Of the Federal
Reserve Board.
I am one OF one hundred and five
million of inhabitants Of the United
States: my duties are the same as
those Of every other true American.
and those of every other true Amerl-
can are the same as mine. Whatever
I contribute to the cause of the coun-
try, may expect to see done--each Ia
his own way-by 105.0O0,000 people.
Let us suppose for the purpose of
illustration that l decide that / shall
effect a saving on clothes. Il might Sc
lect boots. automobiles. umbrellas. or
any other article for which regularly
spend my money. as / have no desire
to single out any one commodity. but
clothes lend themselves to my thought,
so / name them. If l make up my
mind. then. at this juncture that to
wear old clothes is more respectable
than to be seen in new ones; IL de-
eide TO buy one new suit Of clothes
less than l usually purchase each year,
and if figure that suit TO cost no more
than S10-the country as o whole,
should we all pull together and act on
the same lines, would save thereby over
one billion dollars. 1t is true That in
dealing with our l05,000,000 population
we include children and many poor
people that could not save ten dollars
each because they never spend more
for clothes than they absolutely must.
But on the other hand $40 is much
smaller amount than the average man
or woman spends for a new suit of
clothes. The assumption that billion
dollars could easily be saved on clothes
may. therefore. be accepted as conser-
vative.
I The first thought that occurs to us
in this connection is, that by this saw
ing In clothes oyer one billion dollars
would be freed to be invested In Lib
erty loan bonds. That is the first i'm
portant and most obvious result. But
there are other economic results in
volved in this saving that are of far
/ greater importance than the mere saw
ing of money.
/ Economic Results Are Vast.
Let us consider first what one billion
dollars worth of clothes means. Sup
pose they were half-wool and half-cot-
ton and that the value of the raw ma
terial constituted only 80 per cent Of
the price paid by the ultimate consum-
er, that would. at the present price of
GO cents per pound for wool and 30
cents per pound for cotton respectively,
represent 20S,334 tons of wool and 49,
667 tons of cotton. Can you imagine
how much freight space would be re-
CURED on water and on land, In NOV
ing this mass of raw material? Do
you realize that IL these bales were
put into freight cars. assuming a load
ing capacity of 16 tons per car for
wool and 13 tons per car for cotton,
this would represent 1902 box cars
loaded with wool and 32.056 box cars
loaded with cotton? Assuming 20 cars
per train, there would be about 600
trains; the total length of these trains
would be approximately S14 miles. and
these trains, hauled by 600 engines,
when standing i'm line would approx
mately cover the distance from Balti-
more to Pittsburgh? Can you imagine
the amount of coal consumed In first
transporting and then weaving this
II raw material into cloth? Can you Inn
agine the number of hands employed In
these processes? And then consider
that more coal. more labor and, more
transportation are required In distrib.
uting the cloth and again more labor
and more material In converting Ii into
clothes, and again more labor and
transportation in retailing the finished
product to the final consumer.
Let us be mindful that all the time
these processes are being carried on
Uncle Sam Is short of the men neces
sary to dispatch his war work, and
furthermore that shortage of coal ant
the clogging Of the wheels Of transpor
tation have stopped his progress al
most critical moments and in the pres
!
constant menace to the country.
May Cost Your Sons Life.
Ny new suit of clothes means, there
fore. delay for our military operations
delay In transporting and equippini
men. and In sending to them, and t
our allies, the supplies they need
means increased losses and Longer
duration Of the war. My new suit o.
clothes may cost, therefore. the Life
Of my son.
The supply of goods, of labor and OF
transportation is limited. 1t Is mat
ter of common agreement that this linn
tied supply is not sufficient freely e
satisfy all wants and that unrestricted
attempts on the part Of each individual
to satisfy his own requirements may
lead to wild scramble and destruc
tive competition with the government