Burlington weekly free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1866-1928, 1918-03-14
COUNTY COURT MEETS
AND TAKES RECESS.
Jury and Court DOckets Called
and ~ Cases Found Ripe for
Trial-Six Actions in Which
City Is Interested Entered as
Settled.

Tuesday morning at ten o'clock the
March term of the Chittenden county
court convened in the county court house
with Judge Stanley c. Wilson Of Chelsea
presiding. assisted by Judge Henry w
Tracy Of Shelburne and Judge William Fl
Adsit of Burlington, and following the
reading of the Jury and court dockets
the court ordered recess until March q
at two o'clock In the afternoon. to then
further consider the docket. The Jurors
will be summoned TO appear on Tuesday
afternoon, March &c.
Sheriff James II. Allen Of Burlington
formally proclaimed the opening of the
court, following which prayer was offered
by the Rev. w. II. Hutchinson of Shell.
, burne.
Clerk c. J. Russell called the Jury and
Court dockets and 1t was found that on the
Jury docket seventeen cases were ripe for
trial, as follows: G. N. Baldwin vs. George
Palmer. assumpsit Hyman Zelig Feinbere
VS.. Fred l.. Smith. tort; Uradilla s;ilo Co
VS., e. +. Nash, ct nj: Spear Bros. VS.
Loomis-Dak!n Co., Limited. and IT,; In
re will Of Catherine Ryan. Thomas F.
| Conlon, special administrator, proponent
property vs. Catherine Lynch contestant
an appeal from probate court; W. B
Clarke VS.. The Travellers Insurance Co.
| contract: A. b. Kingsland VS.. Sherman
Reynolds. tort: William Sordiff VS.. Oliver
sordff. contract; Mary E. Taylor VS.. Mill.
tary Post Street Railway Co., tort
Orlando L. Aiken VS.. Fred c. Cherrier
| tort; Orlando +. Aiken VS.. w. r. Duke
| shire, tort; Orlando e Aiken VS.. Mabe
Cherrier. tort; w. B. Clarke VS.. George
Fl. Mylkes, ct al. contract Jennie Fraser
Dali
(probably will DO ready in time); The
Hamilton Corporation VS.. the Matted
Cereals Co, contract Alfred f. Warren
ct al, apis, VS.. Mary A. Murphy. exec.
ct al, an appeal from commissioners; ]. L
Hunt vs. Frank T.. Estey. ct al. contract.
On the court docket there were found tc
be ten cases ready for trial. viz: H. C
Ricketson vs. Daniel Lizotte. ct al.
| covenant; John Mitchell, ct al, VS.. A
! Demarco. apt, eject; j. w. Page vs. RALPH
DEMO. apt. assp't: Fitzgerald Bros
Brewing Co. VS.. Charles Caise, contract
University Grocery Co. VS.. A. s. Drew
tort; II. p. Prindle VS.. Edwin J. Viens
| contract: John Milette. ct al. VS.. city OF
Burlington and w. b. McKilip, ct al, VS.
4 city of Burlington, both actions being ap
! peals from street commissioners; JOSEPH
w. Farley VS.. p. E. McSweeney, ct al.
petition for supercedes; Gertrude A. Clapp
apt, VS.. estate of Russell w. Taft appea
from probate. There were six cases II
which the city of Burlington was con
/ cerned and these were continued by Cit,
Attorney H. S. Peck, who reported OF
them.
! A number of other entries in the cour
dockets included Edwin S. Meigs VS.
Thomas p Clay. asspt.. discontinued
Hamilton s. Peck, apt, VS.. estate o
Michael +. Kelley, John r. Kelley. admir-.
hearing on report: b. F. Feinberg VS.. II
j. Cassard and IT., assp't. hearing OF
report Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance Co
vs.. Louis Colodny. ct al, contract, tw,
actions on same case, continued; A. G
Van Nostrand VS.. Joseph Agel and a sec
ond action against Joseph Agel, ct al.
| contract, hearing on report; Martin s
| Villas, admir-. ct al, VS.. Isaac Larow
contract, defendant in bankruptcy, con
| tinued; North American Fruit Exchange
VS.. John Petros, contract, discontinued
Charles L. jackson. ct l., VS.. John II
iTowne, contract, judgment asked for plain
tiff in default of defendants Forrest w
| Taylor VS.. Lila S. Bushby, contract mo
ton for dismissal on part of defendan
made by counsel.
The judges were in conference durin,
the Afternoon On the 25th the court will
convene after the recess and will hea
| several court cases without the presence
| of the jury.