The Sentinel=record., 1918-12-19
Instructions From Court on the Par ticular Point Before First Shot Was
 Fired Is Subject of Controversy.
The Instructions Will Be Settled and the Case Argued Beginning This Morning at O'Clock, and Probably Will Be Concluded Shortly After the Noon Session Is Resumed

and to keep on shooting until sine had stopped him.
 The states reliance on the evidence of Jimmy Mikes, the man at the oth-
 CT end of the telephone, and the support of his having the couveEl @-- tions he had as shown nhis immeu- fate calling the police, the state de-
 bends on as proof that the whole of the story recited by Mrs. Jonos on the
 stand in her defense is not to be taken too literally And the defense claims , that in keeping with the evidence in this case there is all to show who tho aggressor was in this conflict. and that it was under the law q perfect legal self defense as shown by tho
 testimony that has been presented to
 the jury
 The Closing Testimony. The feature of the morning session
 relative to placing evidence before
 the jury was the taking of the jury
 to the scene of the shooting. One juror had made the resuest 10 be talk
 en to the room where the killing had taken place, but later the attorneys
 for the defendant asked that this De ! done. >N,
 The jurors, JdtsC Hogue, tho av.- fendant, attoyheys and officers vis-
 tied the scene. The jurors exam ined the three Ybullet holes in the
 walls carefully One was near tho
 small dressing table on which the desk telephone stood, and it is tho theory of the state that the first bullet fired made that hole in the
 wall Another bullet entered the door in the west wall, and still another bullet entered the plastering above the head of the bed from which tho defendant took the pistol The range of the bullets was examined closely
 by the jurors.
 The defendant wept a little at in- tervals as she revisited the scene of the shooting for the first time since the tragedy. The blood spots were on the floor, and she had to cross over these to enter the room where the bullet marks were visible.
 When court convened Prosecuting Attorney Randolph recalled Mrs. Jonos to ask her if she did not talk to some person over the telephone after the tragedy. She said that she did not know much about that, but might have talked through the phone, but never did have any reply
 Roy Roberts, a soldier at the Army and Navy Hospital testified that he was in the Jonos store the night that he was killed, about 10 o'clock, and that Jonos talked with another Greek in Greek langualge, and seemed ex- tremely angry. On cross examination he did not know what the man was
 talking about or what he was angry
 about, if he was angry
 Mrs. Body stated that she had l known Mrs. Jonos and her husband, and saw Mrs. Jonos the night of the
 tragedy, and also the next day in jail The witness said that Mrs. Jonos i had Liz black and blue marks on her body from bruises. She did not know { how Mrs. Jonos received them, or 1 when.
 Dr. Evans, chiropractor treated | Mrs. Jonos from August II to some time in September, and knew of the
 marks on her body and the disar-
 rangement of limb joint lie treat-
 ed that, and it was made from ,- blew.
 He did not knew who made tho | marks MT. Brandenburg, naw detective,
 who said he had been in the business
 here four weeks, testified to the bal-
 let holes in the wall which he exam
 ined, but this detective never found
 but two bullet holes The third ono
 he overlooked lie said he went there
 to make the investigation at the in-
 stance of attorneys for the defend
 ant
 Bert Hall testified he was at the jail
 when the word of the shooting was 1 telo)honed in, and Jimmy Mikes call
 cd him. and that he went and got
 Mikes and went to the scene of the
 sho0.in@ and arrested Ms. Jonos, | who said che wanted to np to iail
 Tho witness went back later and
 examined the house The body of the
 dead man was in a pool og blood ] CONTINUED ON PAGE Twol