The Barre daily times. (Barre, Vt.) 1897-1959, 1918-03-12
MANY CASES DISPOSED OF
ON THE OPENING DAY
March Term of Washington County
Court Started OFF Busily, Many
Entries Being Made.

| The March term of Washington coun-
ity court convened at Montpelier thi:
morning with some u attorneys present
the largest number present at the open
| ing OF court in some years. Many cases
were disposed of For the first time in
many years court cogvened with only
the presiding judge present. Judge +. l..
Fish had arranged with Judge L. l.. Wa
terman TO preside at this term. An eff
fort was made to find out whether the
assistant judges were on their way and
il was learned that Judge c. H. Dana
was adjusting fire loss and would not
be present until tonight, while it was
learned that Judge G. II. Dale OF Water
bury had not left home and could not get
here until the southbound mail train at
noon. So Judge Fish proceeded with the
business.
Prayer was offered by Stanley +.
Bloomfield Sheriff Tracy made the proc
lamation and the calling Of the docket
took place This resulted in several
cases being settled, entFies being made.
The first case. that of Beatrice r. Tracy
vs.. Forest Tibbetts, went TO the court
docket, while the defendants in the next
Morse Granite company did not want II
trial until later in the term, owing to
one witness being in the army and two
others in Massachusetts cities; but the
plaintiff stated they were ready and had
brought witnesses from some distance at
expense to their client conference oc-
CURED during the noon hour The
next case. that OF Seth Rich VS.. Frank
b. Hutchins, alienation of affections, it
was STATED would be ready for trial.
The defendant wanted information as
to when the alleged adultery occurred.
In the case of Sarah Slayton W.. Moses
Shuttel, settlement is in progress. San
guinetti VS.. Lawrence should not have
been on the trial list, il was stated.
Northfeld Trust company VS.. f. @.
Pierce has been settled and discontinued,
while that of Jones Brewing company
VS.. l.. 5. Meigs was continued, leaving
three of the first days cases for trial.
In the second days list the only case
which is not for trial is that of Hiram |
l.. Sparrow, as administrator of the es
tate of Harriet Bailey, vs.. Vermont Saw
ings bank, in which X. G., Bacon asked |
leave to file a motion for argument. |
II. c. Shurtleff stated, as he held mp |
bunch of like motions, that these had /
been filed in the last several terms, but /
Mr.. Bacon said he was only going to ar i
gue the one he was preparing.
A defaulted judgment was ordered IN
he case of Antonio Banchi vs.. Frank
Toast Monumental company, and as to
he principal defendant in the ease of
alder & Richardson VS.. r. +. Henderson.
A hearing will occur relative to the trus
.ees in that case. The case of McAllister
/ Kent VS.. Mario Zanleoni was entered
Is settled and discontinued, while there
S settlement pending in the case of
Barre Savings Bank & Trust company
u. Ream- McBee company. The case of
suna Union VS.. Thomas Sarkis, trespass,
5 settled and discontinued.
On the court calendar the ease of Mel
lie Roben vs.. II. \. Hoar has been dis
ontinued, while in Capital Savings Bank
Trust company vs.. Murray Martyr a
settlement has been agreed upon and
one win occur in Sturteyant- I
derrick company vs.. Sam Isaac; also in
lark W. Pike.
In the case of Nina HsIsall vs.. Mari &
sordon IL was ordered that Judgment be /,
ertified back TO the commissioner of in
ustrics without costs. Il
In the ease OF Waterbury Savings
ank ". Ella Blondin. a defaulted judg-
nent was entered; also in Trestini ~.
BLOSSOM and Nincenza 0ssola a to prin- !
ipal defendants. a hearing to take place
elativc to trustees. John Brennan v.
american Fidelity company has been set /,
a. Ala ". Montpelier & Wells River ]
,ailroad company and Buch vs.. AverilI '
ave been settled some months In the
ase Of Mary Union vs.. estate Of Mary q
arkis il was ordered that the case be {
ert fled back TO the probate court 1
d. J. Conant asked for a defaulted 7
idcment IN the case Of Roy Sibley ~ !
scob Binsiock and carly execution on c
be Judgment which was ordered. IN this :
sse the defendant bought six COWS of ;
b. plaintiff for $50 but gave him = z
legk Tor $50 snd the case Wss brought >
, recoser the de6cit q