Arizona republican., 1918-07-28

case than MT. Frankfurter did, and many of whom are now demanding that Mooney be pardoned
 We do know the people in the bulk do not know that John Smith of Smithtown Henry Jones of Jonesburg and William Brown of Brownsville properly convicted of murder We may have heard from friends of these unfortunate persons that they were victims of frame up. Yet the people of the United States cannot that information demand that the work of the criminal courts of Smthton. Jonesburg and Brownsville shall be undone that the opinions of the supreme of the states in which these various jurisdictions ie affirming the Judgments of the trial courts, shall be set asde We cannot secure verdicts of acquttal of criminals by popular national election. We cannot ad- minister justice in meetings of protest.
 We must that juries honest, that judges honest and discerning that supreme courts competent. We must especially assume these things when have authentic information to the contrary.
 The supreme court of California the last legally constituted tribunal in the world having jurisdiction in the Mooney case has found nothing irregular in the proceedings resulting his conviction That does not mean that all the members of the court any member of it, believes that Mooney is guilty. It that the supreme court could find in the record for reversing the judgment of the trial court.
 It not the business of the supreme court, and the supreme court had opportunity and could have had to inquire into the guilt innocence of Mooney It could inquire only whether he had had fair trial If so he had had his right. The supreme court of California found that all the rights of Mooney had been to him during the prog ress of his case through the lower court.
 But that is not necessarily the end of the case. There is other person who may act and, what his action may be. it will be legal and therefore proper That person is the governor of California. He may pardon Mooney or he may let him go to the gallows. It is presumed that whatever he may do will be done after he has fully informed himself as humanly possible, to what ought to be done under the laws after he has learned much than MT Frankfurter pretends know concerning the guilt innocence of Mooney; more than any citizen of the United States including the president, possibly know about it. And what the governor may do not be afterward questioned
 Governor Stephens has properly granted Mooney a reprieve until he make study of the case that will enable him inteigently to determine what to do finally. It would have been easy for the gov to pardon Mooney and let him go to trial on another charge against him. But to have done that would been reflection upon the courts; to declared that he had been fairly tried the clamorers for pardon have alleged.
 Mir. Frankfurter further says in his telegram of denial:
 "The that the federal government
 involved because the circumstances
 of the widely attracted attention. both
 in this country and among the people of the
 allies, and therefore became matter of
 nation wide and international concern"
 Among the people of what allies had the case of Mooney attracted attention? Certainly not the Eng fish; not the French; not the Italians; the Japan Only among the bosheviki of Russia, never our allies and in sympathy with Germany. The bolsheviki. recall, had sent impudent demand for the freedom of Mooney, but that demand came from government had yet recognized or have since recognized a government; have sine recognized the bolsheviki only enemies, and w, now preparing to against them.
 So the Mooney has not become Mir Frankfurter says, international. An affair, to b. international, concern at least two nations is that cannot properly and legally con cern single nation, not nation It i the constitutional of single sovereign state
 WHY SHE LEFT HIM