Atlanta semi-weekly journal. (Atlanta, Ga.) 1898-1920, 1918-10-22

Corrected by ": H.. White: Jr.; President Of
White Provision Co. United States food
administration license No. G-21371.
Good TO choice steers, $50 TO 1000 lbs,
10. OOd11.OO
Medium to good steers. $50 to $50 lbs, 800
Medium to choice beef cows. 75O to $50 lbs,
Medium to good cows. $50 to $50 lbs, $50
ASSOC.
Good to choice heIfers $50 to $50 lbs, g. 90
The above -epresents ruling prices fer good
quality fed cattle. Inferior grades dairy types
and range cattle quoted below.
Medium to. good steers. zoo to 500 lbs,
Medium to good cows. GOO to 700 lbs., 600
Mixed common. 100000.
Good fat oxen. 1.OO@S.0
Good butcher bulls, 6.O09S.O0
Choice veal calves, 7.00dS.OO.
Yearlings 5.0Jd6.5O.
Prime hogs, los toe 225 lbs, 15.OOd16.oO
Light hogs, 1870 to 165 lbs, Is GOA 10. 80.
Heavy pigs 100 to $50 lbs, II. 00G14 %.
Light pigs, 50 to 100 lbs, II .000 Il. 90.
mixed fed hogs.
LIVE STOCK BY WIRE
EAST ST. LOUIS. ILL.,, Oct 21.--Catue-Re-
ceipts. 5000, including no Texans; market
steady; native beef steers SIl :50GlS: %; year
S750di2. so; stockers and feeders, IS. 5O@l2. 90;
calves, S7.75@17. %; Texas steers, SIG. OOGp
10: cows and heifers, 81 .50G IL. 90.
Hogs-Receipts, 1000, market steady; mixed
and butchers S17 .OO@ 70; good and heavy,
SiT. 5Oa17. IS; rough SI5. 25615. $50; light,
dlT.65.
Sheep-Receipts, 1000; market steady; clip
ped ewes, Sl1. OOd12. 90; lambs, S14. O00i6. %
Gamers and choppers, S6.00G9.OO.
CHICAGO, oct. 2l.-II0gs: Receipts, $4,000;
market mostly 10 TO 15c lower than Saturday S
average; extremely dun on packing grades.
packing S15.251J 1878; rough S14.5OU %; pigs
good to choice. Sl425fr15.2J.
Cattle: Receipts 10000: better grades of beef
and butcher cattle strong to higher; others
steady; quality poor; calves steady; feeders
strong TO &c hicl er.
Sheep: Receipts 80, 900; sheep strong to high
er; lambs unevenly higher.
French revolution as soft and senti-
mental Before them the accused
had literally no rights, not even to
present a defense, and if he was
permitted to speak in his own be-
hali il was only as generous and
liberal favor.
The defense was not a defense in
our meaning of the word. The law
yer was not allowed to see his eli
ent before he appeared to plead the
case before the court where the
accused was arraigned for trial, and
he was not permitted to speak to
his client curing the trial; often he
did not know what the accusation
was until he trial began and some
times he did not know it even
then.
There were no written charges
and no specifications, much less an
indiCtm ant Or informa ton, indeed
The so-called judges, the bench Of
German officers sitting there in the
senate chImDar. did not know Thorn
selves the charge on which they
were to pass judgment. The secret
police would bring upon them ali
the evidence, as they called ii,
which they had been able to col
Iect, and present it as they pleased,
with no concern as 20 its pcrtincnCe
or re cEJnCH.
The court would admit hearsay,
and prcsumFtionS, and conclusions,
and differences, and lnnuendOS, so
long as they We're on behalf of the
prosecutions. there was no cross
examination, sometimes even no in
1erroEatory on the part of the pre-
siding Judge The accused was
sometimes allowed 20 present a de-
tense, Ou- it was generally only
such as he might contrve in spar
ring with the judges if they queS-
toned him. He had no process for
witnesses in his own behalf. and no
right TO have them heard even when
Lney. were willing 10 appear
(Coninued Next IssueD
published by special arrange
mentS with the Mcclure Newspaper
Syndicate. Copyrighted, 1918, by
Brand Whit'ock. under the title
Memories of Belgium Under the
German Occupation All rights
reserved. Copyrighted in Great
Britain Canada and Australia. All
rights reserved for France, Bel
gium, Holland, italy, Spain, Russia
tho Scandinavian countries