Evening public ledger. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1914-1942, 1918-04-19
relationship of Employer and EniplOye

gigantic accomplishments, when
formerly sufficient
danger losing of relationship in waynan-
any, industrlaly socially.
Charles Carpenter
has the following article the relationship between employer
mploye:
One night longer than the usual
hours There governmental legsla
ton limiting the working employer did not arrive at
hotel until we'll after o'clock modest meal had been saved for
me- and ate the dining during the period when the walters
were fixing the tables breakfast
While eating heard two of the coocd walters IN conversation
Oe Of them said hurry and through
work because he going attend Socialist meeting Where
upon the other waiter protested that there nothing in socialism
The waiter who said he going the Socialist meeting
joined with the rich had much and they should
% up" HIS friend replied: LOOK hee you ana Doth got
good Jobs haven't we? Very we'll Suppose the boss wou' divide up
@h dining room? table and every other
table and did the same with the glassware and the linen
and the svewae Could each of out with our table and
make as much making here|"
These were both apparently ncducaed men, but hcy were m
hhgent they intelligent do And the
reply of the ansocasc the pair the best argument
prove the necessity Of the concentration OF wealth Tor the dement, o
me working people that have heard read Not on my library
which contain the writings of the worlds greatest economists
there more forcbe and convincing Illustration than That given
this humble colored
Here cockey and siverware
uated in one building under one management enaoeu edc
waiter to make good To separate them into their several
units and the walters the units and the walters
WOULD sarye to death trying to make living,
The busy hum would be heard in the roeast
t OF the city OF Philadelphia manufacturing establishments
r here and the manufacturing ou
exist wealth concentrated No could so OF with
e loom and make hundred weave can make
ma mill district where there many looms
some Socialists it is believe that all concentrated wealth
old be in the hands belief which do not
Z u "hch mas very plausible arguments pro ana eoi - va"
no useful these down. however except to
tht Socialists distribution Of wealth be
by having concentrated in the hands OF the Govern
admit that wealth for the pros
n Nrhy, OF the people.
That is say while there a who
pnrol the wealth, opinion is unanimous that
should be anarchists known
communists believe there should be concentration oe wealth
eeve the concentrated wealth should be community wealth.
ana shared alike members of the community,
can therefore, woingman that whether
Oac theory ownership wealth by the Federal Govern
or the communisc ownership of wealth by tho COM
f ANY or city, the prevailing system of ownership OF wealth by
employer is in of wealth the individual
IA VIII be virtually Aggregate ownership OF wealth
solution distribution unless capable OF
ng his imagination believe that he actually
N s what the Government owns
any reader thinks be OF the City Han let nm
own with and take one chip OF
~ ana use il himself will realization that the
"egeuee between ownership and Government owner
that tue qpyernment individual entirely void
N1 reason soul acipa Individual pos
Hpnan atrbuiss psrcelses Ahot concentrated
pp' folly hut necessity and blessing