The Owosso times. (Owosso, Mich.) 1897-1926, 1918-11-08


Surety Co.; in the matter of the appeal
from the probate court in the estate Of
Walter Baird, deceased; Thomas Muir
doch VS.. Ann Arbor r. r. Co.; Super
Tor Coal Co. VS.. A. A. r. Co.; Oscar
E. Driver and Sheldon Driver VS.. G.. +
McAnnich; Anna Perry VS.. Austin Cur
rier, ct: al; Albert X. Oils VS.. Ban
croft Elevator Co.; Frank 8. Smith VS.
Martin Dewitt, ct. al; The w. r. Rit
ter Lumber Co. VS.. Biggam Trailer Co.
in the matter of the appeals from the
probate court in the estate of Caroline
Bugbee, deceased, Judson r. Smith
claimant; in the matter of the appeal
from theSprobate court in the estate OF
Caroline Bugbee, Clyde Smith, claim
ant; in the matter of the appeal from
the probate court in the estate of Caro-.
line Bugbee, Charles Smith, claimant
w. Hughes VS.. Roy Peace, appeal;
Lloyd Tower VS.. Floyd Bassett, tres.
pass; Frank Peacock VS.. Detroit, Grand
Haven and Milwaukee railroad; Thos
Veit, by his guardian, VS.. Arthur Steg-
gall and Eliza Steggall; VIM. A. Spen-
Ger VS.. Phillips and Taylor; Jennie
McEachan, ct. al, VS.. Charles Potter,
ct. al; George Caruso' VS.. William F.
Juhl, appeal; James Sullivan VS.. Fidel-
ity and Casualty Company, ct al; Jay
Rogers VS.. Michigan Railway Co.; Jos
Rundel VS.. Farmers Cooperative Ele-
vator Co.; Bankers Commercial Secur-
ity Co. VS.. William Closer, ct al; Orbin
Moore VS.. Toney Radon, appeal; Pearl
Odcll VS.. Anna Rifkin.
Default cases: Florence PARROT VS..
Mamie f. Crawford; Mary Nacovsky
VS.. Francis Matavsek; w. H. Launstein
ct al VS.. International Consolidated
Record association.
Law cases in which no progress has
been made for one year: RhOda Pear
sail VS.. Walter L. Colby; Irving W..
Norris VS.. Thomas Clarey ct. al.
Chancery cases in which no progress
has been made for one year and which
will be dismissed unlees some showing
is made: Grace VS.. Angus Bird; Emma
VS.. Arthur Smith; Cara VS.. Joseph
Skutt; Beryl VS.. Jerome Hirschman;
John VS.. Schuyler Rouse, all divorce
cases.
Divorce cases: Vera VS.. Frank Har-
ris; Mark VS.. Florence Bell; Eta VS..
Roscoe Lyons; Maude VS.. Herbert J.
Baldwin; Hattie VS.. John Northwood;
William VS.. Dora Parnes; Edith Nc
Cauley VS.. Edwin McCauley; Ellen VS..
Lewis Barber; Matilda VS.. Edward
Howe; Della VS.. Frank Goodknecht;
sA uusI :uumlIeH qdesof 'sA qlna
Rollie Mcdonald; Olive VS.. Albert
Peckens; Ernest VS.. Etha Hill; Emma
vs.. Edward Monroe; Joseph VS.. Edna
Amelia VS.. John Ewing;
Bose VS.. Charles Spring; Eleanor VS..
Loren May; Thomas VS.. Maggie Harris;
Frank VS.. Mary Volasek; Edward VS..
Harriet Gunther; -Eunice VS.. George
Lena VS.. Demonion Alien;
Oliver VS.. Gladys Salisbury; Alice VS..
iWhitmore. hle2S rtt;
contested divorce cases: George
W. VS.. Emma Livingston; Eyah, VS.. Viii.
lam. HillmanD Forest Tvs. Blanch Hat
ield.AIH Hstuf a. t.ru ".r
ChancerylHcasesa Ellen Turner VS..
Howard Slocum, ct al, injunction; VIM.
scott,vs. Delos Curtis, ct al, injunction;
George Caruso VS.. William F. Juhl, in
junction.; Mary belong VS.. U. S. Dun.
'ar, to set aside deed; William Bruno
IS. Dolphius Bruno, in aid of execution;
The Citizens Savings Bank VS.. Joseph
:. Haney, injunction and accounting;
'ayette E. Legg VS.. Fred Bowers, to
ANGEL deed.