The Owosso times. (Owosso, Mich.) 1897-1926, 1918-08-23


Corunna on Tuesday morning, Sept.
2, when the following calendar will
be disposed Of:
Criminal Cases
People VS.. VIM. Jenkins, assault
with intent to murder, People VS..
VIM. Steve and Mary Johnson, lar
ceny, People VS.. Adelbert Kay, lar
ceny.
Attorney Walter M. Bush, assistant
prosecuting attorney, will handle the
cases for the people in the absence of
Prosecutor Pulver, who has been
taken into the, U. S. service.
Law Cases.
Rhoda Pearsoll VS.. Walter L. Col
by, trespass; Sarah Powers VS.. j.
Memo Bentley, trespass; Hguh A.
Mcdonald VS.. John T. McCurdy, tres
pass; Irving w. Norris VS.. Thomas
Clarey and Katherine Clarey, as
sumpsit; appeal of the estate Of Gus
tave Knop; Max August VS.. Silas N.
Pierce, trespass; futile Coal Com
pany VS.. Henry A. Speaker, assump-
sit; Glenn Chalker VS.. Grand Trunk
railroad, trespass; l.. Frank Rice VS..
Michigan Railways company, tres
pass; Edwin r. Johnson VS.. Grand
Trunk Railroad company, trespass;
William C.. Rolf vs.. l.. C. Mountain,
assumpsit; Kittie Barrows VS.. The
Michigan Bonding and Surety COM
pany, trespass; appeal of the estate
Of Walter C. Baird; Thomas Muir
dock VS.. Ann Arbor Railroad COM
pany, trespass; Superior Coal COM
pany VS.. Ann Arbor Railroad COM
pany, trespass; The Motor Mart VS..
George Hafner and Henry Lytle, re-
plevin; Oscar E. Driver and Sheldon
E. Driver VS.. G. F. McAnnich, as
sumpsit; Anna Perry VS.. Austin p.
Currier, ct. AL trespass; Mary Ma
covsky VS.. Francis Matovsck, tres
pass; Phillips and Taylor VS.. The
Michigan Railways company, tres
pass; Edna A. Chapman VS.. Grin L.
Coon, punishment; Albert X. Ohles
VS.. Bancroft Elevator company, APP
peal; Frank Stewart Smith VS.. Mar
tin A. Dewitt, ct. al, assumpsit; w.
M. Ritter Lumber company VS.. The
Biggam Trailer Corporation, assump-
sit; appeal Of estate of Caroline II.
Bugbee, Judson r. Smith, claimant !;
appeal of the same estate, Clyde
Smith, claimant; appeal in the same
estate, Charles C. Smith, claimant /;
} William Hughes VS.. Roy Pierce, ap-
peal; Lloyd Tower VS.. Floyd Bos-
sett ct. al, trespass; Frank Peacock
VS.. Grand Trunk RAILROAD company,
trespass; Mabel Wilcox VS.. John w.
Wing, appeal; Thomas M. Veit VS..
Arthur and Eliza j. Steggal, assump-
sit; William A. Spencer VS.. Phillips
I and Taylor, trespass; Jennie NcEach-
} eron, Glen McEacherop, ct. AL, VS..
Charles and Ella Potter trespass
: George Caruso VS.. William f. Juhl,
appeal; Joseph Rundell VS.. Farmers
Cooperative Elevator company, APP
peal.
Chancery Matters.
The divorce cases on the contest
} ed chancery calendar are BeryI VS..
Jerome Hieschman; John E. VS.. Hat
tie Corcoran; Vera VS.. Frank Harris
William j. VS.. Florence l.. King;
Eyta VS.. Roscoe Lyons !; Maud Velma
VS.. Herbert j. Baldwin; Gladys vs..
, Nathan Roth; Mabel VS.. Isaac
} Thompson; Hattie r. VS. John North
wood; William o, VS.. Dora Barnes
) Glen A. VS.. Mona Zimmerman; Edith
VS.. Edwin McGauley; Ellen VS.. Lewis
Barber; Matilda VS.. Edward Howe /;
Della VS.. Frank Goodknecht; Ethel
VS.. Henry Peltier; Euniee M. VS..
George Z. Willers; Lena VS.. Rollie
Donnell; Olive A.. VS.. Albert j. Peck
ems.
The pro confesso or uncontested
divorce eases are:- Florence l.. VS..
/ Eugene Allen Pitts; Maud VS.. Ed
ward j. Ellsworth; Joseph VS.. Pearl
Getting; Leota VS.. Sam Vezzene
(, Amelia VS.. John E. Ewing; Ada May
VS.. Llewellen Hart; Rose VS.. Charles
N. Spring; Louise VS. Hiram Find
ley; Eleanor L. VS.. Loren A. May +;
Thomas VS.. Maggie Harris; George
VS.. Edith M. Elwood.
The other cases on the chancery
: calendar are: j. c. and Susan Ban.
hart VS.. Walter and Amelia ELS
worth and Clarence Croel, to re-
strain waste; Allen Turner VS.. How
ard and Mabel Slocttm, injunction
: Harry T, Newcomb and Ellen Turn
er VS.. Howard and Mabel Slocum,
injunction; William il. Scott, ct. al,
: VS.. Delos D. Curtis, injunction; Geo.
Caruso vs. William f. Juh1, ifijunc-
ton; Amelia Nye VS.. Mary Rose, ct.
, , al, bill to set aside will; J. III. Van
Il IoTa h. 20