New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1918-07-17
LITIGANTS WEARY
FAIL ]. TO SHOW UP
PARTIES TO SEVERAL, LAWSUITS
NOT ON HAND WHEN CASES
ARE CALLED
ALE MATTERS LEFT OVER FR0n1
SPRING TERMS OF COURT
NOW SETTLED u

Practically all of the cases that were,
set for trial in June and july have
been disposed of by Judge Olson. In
one case, that Of Joseph Wiltscheck VS..
Ellen Werring which was taken under
Amusement of the Court, no order has
as yet been filed. -.
Cases Settled
In the matter to enforce collection.
OF taxes, Brown County VS.. Albert G..
Anderson and also in the case of Jacoh4.
Klossner Jr ct al VS.. Amanda Wicherski
ct al, the Court, was told that the cases
had been settled as per stipulation to
be filed. The case of Noel C. Hoffman,
VS.. +. w. La Cow was stricken from the
calendar. In the case of Stuebe Bros.
VS.. The M. & St. L. R. R. Co., the parties
to the suit filed stipulation of facts
and the plaintiff filed his brief also and
the defendant was given time to file.
his brief with the Court, at later date.
No one appeared for the State in re
State OF Minnesota VS.. Edward F. Berk--
ner and this case stands practically
dismissed.
n. '.' No One Appears
The cases of Carl Dittbenner vs..
Ferd. Gluth and Annie Fass VS.. A. N.
Haas were stricken from the calendar.
no one appearing when the cases we're
reached for trial. In the case of Joseph
Kamseter VS.. VIM. Jaques there was no
appearance on the part Of the defendants
and Judgment was entered in favor of
the plaintiff decreeing that he is the
towner in fee simple Of a acre timber
tract which was in controversy. ~.
The case of Edward F. Berkner VS.,
O. J. Olsen was tried June rs and judg-
ment was entered in favor of the plain
tiff for $61.78. In that case, stay of
proceedings was granted for 40 days.
In the case of J. H. Addy VS.. L. A. Sand
berg Judgment was entered in favor Of
the plaintiff for the sum Of $34.4O. The
case of George Gag VS.. Rice Lake.
Menighed was reported settled when It
was reached. ~rs.> ~,
Separation Granted
In the case of Katie Darkow VS.. Emil
Darkow Judge Olsen decided that there
were not sufficient grounds to grant
either the plaintiff or defendant a d.
vorce. He did decide, however, that the
defendants had sufficient grounds ter,
live separate and apart from the pIaln=-
tiff and ordered that the plaintiff gay
defendant the sum of $1,000 toward
her support and maintenance,
In the case of Maggie Schreinerr VS.
Anton Schreiner, divorce wass granted!
plaintiff and the defendant was awarded I
the sum Of $4,000 personal property
Everything else remains the property of
the plaintiff. In the case of Theo-
Johnson VS.. VIM. johnson ct al, which
is partition suit, an interlocutory, order
was entered under which the property
is to be sold by Sheriff W. J. julius as
referee. In the. case Of Mike Gareis
VS.. John T. Dietz and John Schougal
the Court filed an order for Judgment in
favor OF the plaintiff in the sum of
$35O.95 with interest from December
5, 1917 together with the costs and dis,
bursements of the action. When the
case of Albert Gambler and "A. Wishnick
VS.. L. Shapiro was reached it was re-
ported that it had been settled out Of
Court. This disposed Of all cases that:
had been set for trial at the adjourned
term.