New-York tribune., 1918-02-28
I'M April 26 1917, we received this complaint:

complaint:
an. Ts ass sss as : Of e w s sss % '
% rspaas alt the % s9a @ nn 5 new new nRT % 3 finish m rs
s ssss 5sss sas s'sf s's
sss. r
fa Gs S @ o a @ nv S SKINS p t5e fron ana @
espSn a agreed Ike new
coudnf say Exactly Working on Just an
s @ % s srsd BE 94 s .n " his @ @ @ M did not '" E III IT,
The complaint the Company May
1917 The remodeng of the had taken place October and
the complainant had worn since that time In his reply letter
Mr. Tanner suggested that submit the we
should select He promised that would by the
decision our expert as to whether or not the work which he had done
satisfactory We submitted the unbiased appraiser
He summed up his inspection of the these
should n "s % Say coat ? in 3 % @ as@sss tt s ~ M s @
h4vs @ Usage dun R s as
is evident the claim made by Mrs. H. justified
This impartial testimony Tanzer Instead of abiding
by the fur experts opinion he had promised Mr. Tanzer
marae letter. which he discredted the m
n attacked the character and integrity Of the complainant
pompous declaration of his excellent
the top of the letter head which this amazing written Mr.
Ianzer prints guarantee:
saefS e7sFy a 9sspssf sH
M it hp hps been
Mr. Tanner did coat and we therefore
sent it to him May 2 1917 Considering the tae
On December 49, 1917, the complainant wrote
asking what had become the visits telephone calls
and letters had elected nothing from Mr. Tanner
1esponence reopend but had better luck with
police court would be the effective regain
ing her property if not Of securing adjustment pre-
tened to MI Tanner January 49, and delivered
the residence Mrs H. while she absent from the
package was opened the proved to be IN eaoy the
when deivered to NJ. Taneev in iayi
In hanging shop feel keeny the restrictions
against the of beous evading to the
cevery out of the of the proved
most Artfu Ddger is fitting that the public wary when
cntempates shopping the Thrh Street
newspapers "A genuine rupture c1p
sent on trial to prove it." 1t nearly auavs dsr,,s 49, ;
E. Brooks Inventor appliance cured himself and who is
giving oter the benefit his experience 1ypured saws the
to-day at Iarsha Michigan just here let
from letter written The Tribune of the Am
Medical Association:
the 51soS Ts aSvesq a @ Of Forth the Is sF.oa9 zap
s years. @ snow" mat / 0''S
In urging rpured readers write and in giving
address Of the deceased Marshall Michigan only possible
ference is that Marshall Michigan, the dead
Apopos Rupture Cure Dr. Cramp of The Journal
of the American Medical Association writes:
"sS: M you sas s Hg'qss ss ss
ff H. s5a,s ssius,s5s @
stand for r'ss IS TINS ?" and aAsFA"'
Among the circulars issued by the people one headed
Government lest This test according Brooks advertising
satisfied the United States that the Brooks
Rupture Appliance thoroughly reliable
ana SINCE uat time the T. s. Government the
we m nave aa we quote from letter the
office of the Surgeon General Department. dated January
27, ~ ~
iefmet ehcers and enlisted of Navy
e cost the United
pE Tor eNaination b. United
ooi, h0 after examination, kind he
ded and . sasisaeo as 4R ons do does st nos
% y ais's sdjass 5 S jsasnSe @ as "eG" tss s
.tn"n 20 nave at public
oy me Appliances
,e A9p average
ENe year leafet o BrookR
~ reference that
appliance has announcement
efficient
IS no
ne knowedge and consent
The government states that the Brooks tr Furnished
them 'as not exceeded Of p
cular claims that tie "U s. the best customer we have
had If the best they twelve tres year
business must De very much decline.
The Brooks adver is dubious prints the photograph
dead man and refers him the
when it publishes Testimonials because they the unang mark
the quack i is unethca when the Brooks annae
tested and mdoed by the