The gazette-times. [volume] (Heppner, Or.) 1912-1925, 1918-06-20

VII we auu the so called "Ocrupa-
fionaF' tax our total taxation On in
comes of $4,000 is 6% per cent. and
on incomes of $4,000 9& per cent?
In other words, our income taxation
is more democratic than that of any
other country in that the LARGEST in.
comes are taxed much more heavily
and the small and moderate incomes
much more lightly than anywhere else
and incomes up to $4,000 for married
men not taxed at all.
(5) 1t is true, on the other hand,
mat on very large Incomes as distin-
gulshed from the largest incomes
Income tax is somewhat l,wer than
the English tax, but the difference by
which our tax is lower than the Eng.
lish tax is incomparably more pro-
nounced in the case of small and mod.
crate incomes than of large incomes.
The Excess Profits" Tax Here and
Abroad
Moreover, if we add to our income
tax our so called "eycess profit tax,'
which is merely an additional income
tax on earnings derived from busi-
ness, we shall find that the total tax
to which rich men are subject is In
the great majority of cases heavier
here than in England or anywhere
else.
(4) 1t Is likewise true hat the Eng.
lish war excess profit tax is so per
cent. Qess various offsets and allow
anceS), whilst our so called excess
profit tax ranges from 20 per cent. to
60 per cent.
But 1t is entirely misleading to base
conclusion as to the relative heavl-
ness of the American and British tax
merely on a comparison Of the rates.
because the English tax is assessed
on a wholly different basis from the
American tax.
The American excess profit law (so
eaIled) taxes all profits derived from
business over and above a certain
moderate percentage, regardless OF
whether or not such profits are the
result of war conditions. The Ameri-
can tax is general tax on income de-
rived from business in addition to
the regular income tax. The Emo.
Iish tax applies only to excess war
profits-that Is, only to the sum
by which profits In the war years
exceed the profits in the three years
preceding the war which in En~land
were years of great prosperity. In
other words, the English tax is nomi-
nally higher than ours, but it applies
only to war profits. The normal prof
its Of business-i. e., the profits which
business used to make in peace time
are exempted In England. There, only
the excess over peace profits Is taxed.
Our tax, on the contrary, applies to all
profits over and above a very moder-
ate rate on the money invested in
business.
We Tax Normal Profits, They TAX Only
War Profits
In short, our lawmakers have de-
creed that normal business profits are
taxed here much more heavily than
in England, while direct war profits
are taxed less heavily.
You will agree with me in question
ing both the logic and the justice of
that method, 1t would seem that it
would be both fairer and wiser and
more in accord with public sentiment
If the tax on business in general were
decreased and, on the other hand, an
increased tax were imposed on spe-
cific war profits.
90 Our federal Inheritance tax Is
far higher than it is in England or
anywhere else. The maximum rate
here on direct descendants is 2712 per
cent. as against 20 per cent. In Eng.
land In addition to that, we have
state inheritance taxes which do not
exist in England.
60 OF her total actual war expen-
ditures exclusive ofrloans to her al
lies and interest on war lOans) Eng
land has raised less than IS per cent.
by taxation (France and Germany far
less), while America is about to raise
by taxation approximately % per cent
of her total war requirements (eXclu-
sive of loans to the allied nations and
of the amount to be invested in mer.
camille ships which, being a produc-
tive Investment, cannot properly be
classed among war eXpenditures).
We men Of business are ready and
willing to be taxed in this emergency
to the very limit Of our ability and to
make contributions to war relief work
and other good causes without stint.
The fact Is that, generally speaking,
capital engaged in business is now
being taxed in America more heavily
than anywhere else In the world We
are not complaining about this we do
not say that 1t may not become neces-
sary to impose still further taxes; we
are not whimpering and squealing and
agitating, but-we do want the people
to know what are the present facts,
and we ask them not to give heed to
the demagOgue who would make them