Bisbee daily review., 1918-07-07

r. 5. Moore, John Pesceyi, Wm. Black burn, Gus Selin. Dan German, Sam Brooks, John Verbanac, Larry Will Hams, Anton Krall. John Krall, Wm. Weitzenfeld, J. O. Mccoy, Charles Nord. John Mccormack, Robert Hast ings, Chas. c. Weiss, Chas. H. Bentley, J $. Smith, Julius Lange, Anti Cold en, John Halloran. John Gary, Pat O'Neil. R W. Webb, John LeDue, r. l.. Della, l.. Parks. Matt K. Saari, Os- car Johnson, oscar Morris, George Zu- yich, W. $. Lawrence, RObt E. Pas tors, Timothy McEnery. Joseph Kin kella, Tony Puhar, Mike Mukyac. Y. Cunningham, Andrew Spacal. James Casey, John Ercek. John Mugich, C. Linn, J. $. Wofford, C. II. Stollings. l l.. Stollings, Nick Marcetich. R. A. Waddil, Thomas English, Jack Ringo. Harry Handley. Frank McAleer. Eli VuksOn, T. H. Loftus, Peter Kundark Michael Simmons. Frank Vucich. l.. Pans0r, Jacob Hill, Francisco Barba, A. $. Embree, Peter Morgan. Alfred G. Hendrick, Selba Maxwell, Ed Gran din, Frank Aldace, John McAughey, K. lsaacsOn, Wm. B. Cleary, D. F. Shine, V. D. Carten
 The defendants In the action from | whom they wish to recover damages are: The Fl PasO & Southwestern Railroad company. Phelps Dodge Mer- camille company, Copper Queen Con solidated Mining company. Phelps Dodge corporation, Calumet & Arizona Mining company, Shattuck Arizona | Copper cmopany, Walter Dauglas, Nj. J. Cunningham, Harry Wheeler
 Charles w. Allen, James R. Tender son, Ben Frankenberg, Sam Franken-
 berg, Nose Newman, Grant II. Dowell,
 John Angius. Arthur Notman, Lem Shattuck, J. E. Curry. and Florian B.
 King
 The complaint as filed reads as fol
 lows:
 The plaintiff complaining of the aboVe-named defendants for cause of action against said defendant alleges 1. That the Fl PasO & SOuthW est ern Railroad company is a corpora tiOn organized and existing under the
 lows of the state of Arizona; that the Phelps Dodge Mercantile company. the Copper Queen Consolidated Mining
 company and the Phelps Dodge cor. poratiOn are corporations organized
 and existing under the laws of the state of New York; that the Calumet & Arizona Mining company is a cor. i pOration organized and existing under the laws of the state of Michigan: that the Shattuck Arizona Copper company is a corporation organized and exisc ing under the laws of the state Ci Minnesota; that all of the above mentioned corporations were at the | time of the grievances hereinafter
 mentioned, and are now doing busi
 ness in the state of Arizona, in Co chise county therein.
 2. That heretofore. on. to-wit, the
 18th day of July, 1917, the plaintiff
 was, and had been for some time prior thereto, domiciled in and a resident oi the county of COchise, state aforesaid
 and on the day aforesaid. the defend ants, and other persons to the plaintiff
 unknown, at, to-wit, in the county aforesaid, with force and arms, to-wit
 by and through the employment by the defendants of a large force oi about 1000 armed men, and with the design to take him, the plaintiff, out Oi ] this state, and without having estab ] lished any claim or right therefor, did l arrest and imprison the plaintiff, and with force and arms aforesaid did
 thereupon carry the plaintiff out oI said county of COchise. state of Ari
 zona, into another county and state | to-wit, into the state of New Mexico 3. That by the wrong and injury aforesaid the plaintiff sustained dam
 ages in this. that he, the said plaintiff
 was by the act of the defendants as aforesaid, taken away from his usua place of domicile and residence, busl ness and vocation, and from his fam | fly, friends and relatives and prevent ed from returning thereto, and there | by suffered severe mental and physi i cal pain and anguish, and was prevent | cd from carrying on and pursuing hi. usual vocation and business, all to hi. | damage in the sum of S10.000. That tho
 act of the defendants aforesaid wa,
 wanton and wilfull and in. violation o ! the laws of the state of Arizona anc
 of the United States, and did deprive
 the plaintiff of civil rights, privilege:
 and immunities guaranteed to him by the laws of the state of Arizona and o | the United States.
 Wherefore the plaintiff prays judg
 ment against the defendants in ih6
 sum of S10,000 actual damages by hin
 sustained. and for the further sum o
 S10,0O0 as and for punitive damages and for his costs herein sustained. The papers in the action will mol
 be served by the sheriffs office and tha county will hose that amount in
 fees as they intend ti have some ono
 of their own representatives serve the
 papers. It is expected that service vii
 be made next week some time as the
 work of completing the filing and the