The Fulton County news. [volume] (McConnellsburg, Pa.) 1899-current, 1918-04-11

turned from idols"
.ss@ That Is the second
w step in the expert
ence of every true
! -.~s$e Christian. Il Ia
"a A idols are not nee.
kI A A cssarily those
'------- - : : - >,s-=l made of wood or
stone, but anything upon which the af.
fecilons have been set. The order
here Is worthy Of noting. 1t Is not
from idols TO God, but to God from
idols. This Is significant, because II Is
when one turns to God that he gets the
power from God to turn from idols.
The third step was the one Of serv-
ice; "tO serve the living and true God"
Such should DO the step taken by ev'
cry child Of God, for while not saved
by works, we are saved TO work. The
last and fourth step in their experience
was "tO wait for his Son from heaven
And should not this be cur attitude,
too, If we are following in the steps
Of these ThessalOnica Christians?
Expecting Jesus.
Evidently from their attitude, these
early Christians believed that Jesus
was to return from heaven. The back
ground of their belief was the fact that
God had raised his Son, even Jesus
from the dead. To them the resurrec-
tiOn meant more than the continued
existence Of the personality of Jesus
after his death; II meant his bodily
resurrection, and coupled with this WIS
their belief in his bodily ascension into
heaven. II Is not difficult to see how
with such faith, 1t was easy for them
TO believe in the return 10 this earth
of their risen and ascendcd Lord.
Were they in their faith mistaken
There Is only one place for us To 90
to find out and that Is to the Bible.
Those who have taken the pains TO
count, tell us that there are in the
New Testament alone, 3lS references
10 the second coming of Christ. This
shows the large place that this subject
holds in these Scriptures. not TO say
anything about the reference to ii in
the Old Testament.
Not Death.
But are we not to understand by
these references to the second coming
of Christ the death Of the believer?
Many have so taught, but that such
teaching is Incorrect is evident, II we
take the passages in which these ref
crcnceS occur and substitute the word
death for the word or words which
refer to Christ, as, for example, In our
text, which would then read, "tO wait
for death from heaven, even death
whom he raised from the dead" This
Is so absurd that we see at once that
by the second coming of Christ Is not
meant the death of the believer.
But does II not mean the coming OF
the Holy Spirit? This teaching Is far
more plausible, for as some one has
said, and his saying is true in a sense,
"the Holy Spirit Is Chrlsts other self"
Yet II is evident that we must not con-
fuse the Lord Jesus Christ with the
Holy Spirit. Jesus himself Is careful
In making the distinction and speaks
Of the Holy Spirit as another COM
forter whom ! will send unto you, even
the Spirit Of truth" Clearly by this
statement he does not mean himself
any more than when he speaks of his
own coming he means the Holy Spirit.
Manlfcstly only by the most severe
straining of the Scriptures could the
second coming of Christ be interpreted
to mean the coming of the Holy Spirit
Try the same test used To prove that
by the second coming of Christ death
Is not meant and substitute for the
word or words referring TO the Holy
Spirit word or words referring to
Christ and the absurdity is Just as ap-
parent. As for example, in the passage
quoted above; 1t Is impossible as you
will see, to make this substitution and
have any sense whatever left. Try Il,
and you will he convinced that by the
second coming of Christ Is not meant
the coming Of the Holy Spirit.
Not Destruction OF Jerusalem.
But may II not mean the destruction
of Jerusalem by Titus in A. ID. 20? BY
no means, for In the Revelation, chap
ter 90, verse 20, is the last promise Of
our risen Lord given long after the de-
StruCtion of Jerusalem to John, the
aged, on the island of Patmos: "Sure-
ly, | come quickly And in response,
the old apostle lifts his voice and
cries, "Amen, even so, come Lord
Jesus" This makes It very evident
that by the second coming of Christ
Is not meant the destruction of Jeru-
salem.
Well, what Is meant? Just precisely
what the Scriptures teach; that Jesus
Christ, the risen, ascended, glorlfled
son Of man is to return second time
to this earth.
He himself so taught by direct word
and by parable and so taught his dis
ciplcS, and so In expectation of his re-
turn they waited
To try TO make the second coming
Of Christ mean anything else than the
literal personal return of the Lord
Jesus Christ to this earth is to twist
and pervert the Scriptures from their
plain and simple meaning. "Ths same
Jesus" said the two men in white ap-
parel at his ascension, (which is taken
up from you into heaven, shall so come
In Ike manner as ye have seen him 20
into heaven
amen. Even so, come Lord Jesus"