Evening public ledger. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1914-1942, 1917-04-13
u I'm INDUSTRIAL BALL SCHEDULE
B WILL GET UNDER WAY ON APRIL %
Two Eight-Club Organizations Will Finish Sea-
son on Diamond September Is, and Winners
Will Meet for the Championship

Son. Sgns vs. PHILADELPHIA Roll and Machine. at
Sons, at Lupton Barrett Company vs. Hess
,nrIght, at Hess Bright IIoughton Company vs..
Ward Company vs. Phiiadeiphia Roll and Ma.
cn,mhe; mey et at P%niladGlphia % Rou. a., ,,
p,aany, ~ wardri Barrett Company VS.. Hough.
Machine o -. at ssr HoHsh'G9 rh9SSGPh@ Re Gna
81 TX NM ~ Lnptons Sons vs.. Miller Loci. Company.
June MILLER Lock Company VS. u l.. Ward
chIn IhoImpany' st Ward; Phiodelphia Roll and Ma,
bright VS. quaker city Rubber. at Quaker city;
ID Lupton's Sons vs. Barrett Company. at Bar
June o--II2ughton G. Co. ys. u l.. Ward
RpsP' RG%PPanS y, I Ward p upons so, Sons vs. Hess
PTappiy pan, ys, Tna$delphia Roll and Machine, at
June iG,-Phadelphla Roll and Machine vs..
rany vs. HsssRrsS tPGm AZ R % Houshon
. Co VS. Quaker city Rubber at Quaker city;
j., L. Ward Company vs. Barrett, Company at
oJ 5gnG Ssp l. Ward comPary VS. p IB
end Machine vs.. Quaker Giity hahber, at Quaker
pany' at At Milor '' LOCK. ', ''''''' 'O.N ''''
June 3o,-Houshtqn & c.. vs.. y. f.uptons
HessRrsb. Hess .'tO% 1t HessBreh rn quaker Sty Rub.
hsr Ss MTr 0%s fpSny at d Mtr and GI @
chine. e' Phlauelrhia Boil. =, ,,-...
sons SH' at % %pton oi rbadsfa RSH Roll l. Ana %p'SI Ma
chine VS.. liess-Bright At Hoss.srght; D. l..
Quaker city, HouEhton Co vs. Barrett Com
July lt-Philadelpbla Roll and MACHINE. VS..
u. l.. Ward Company, at ward; Miller Lock
Compsny vs. Moughto1 & CO.. at r,IIS rM9IpSghton,
Quaker city; Hess-Rrisht vs. Barrett Company.
July 2i-Rarrett Company vs. - 1.urton's
sons, at l.upton; Quaker CITY Rubber vs.. Hess
Bright at Hess23rght; H. L. Ward Company
Houshton & Co. VS.. Philadelphia Roll and Ma
e'TG g%y az rRi@aeR9a hS S D Lup,ons Sons
ct Lupton; n. !. Ward Company VS., Houghton
Chine VS.. MiileT Lock Company. at Miller SI Lock-
Quaker City Rubber vs.. Barrett Company at
August I'D: l., Ward Company VS. d. .Lup-
tons tons Sons at Lupton; Houghton & Co vs.. Hess.
vs.; Quaker city Rubber. at Quaker city; Pha-
delpha Roll and Machine VS.. Barrett Company
August 11-Rarrett Company VS.. d. L. Ward
Company. at Ward Quaker city Rubber vs.
Mer nc an gu Gr hos HrShf Is Ys
tons Sons, vs.. Philadelphtt Roll and Machine.
August ls-Iiess-Brient vs.. n. l., Ward Com
pany' at Ward; Barrett COMPANY, vs.. Houghton
CS omnnT az monSh'Gn n s soDs oacr M MfT ty
Rubber vs. Philadelphia Roll and Machine. at
=, August .a-Houghton & Go; VS.. p. Lupton' $
Sons Sons at at tnpton PnIladerhia I1nl Bo and Ma
Ward Company VS.. QUAKER City Rubber at
Quaker. city; Miller Lock Company VS.. Barrett
September Miller Lock COMPANY VS.. u. l..
Ward WA CSmgany o 25 Ward PhiadeiTP1ha Roll
HessB Bright vs. Quaker City Rubber. at Quaker
at Barrett.
September s-Quaker City Rubber vs.. d.
lupton's Sons at LuptonS Barrett Company vs..
ffoss-Bright ut Hoss-Bright; IIoughton co.
vs.. Miller Lock Company at Miller Lock: u.
L. Ward Company VIZ. Philadelphia Roll and
Machine. AT Philadelphia Roll.
ScptemDer 15--IToughton g. Co vs.. n L.
Ward Company. at Ward; y. Lupt.n's Sons
Hess Brgh,. Mt hess- Bright Barrett Company
VS.. Quaket City Rubhcr at Quaker City; Miller
Lock Cor.ipany vs.. Philadelphia Roll and Ma
chine. philadelphia Roll