The Washington times., 1917-11-28
"JACK'' DE SAULLES' HOME LIFE
REVEALED BY WIDOWS TESTIMONY

from Mrs. Iglehart or Mrs. Mooney.
Under the deft interrogation of Dis
trlct Attorney Weeks Mrs. De Saullei
ives led into admitting that DR.
Wight, who had been her constant at
tending physician at Mineola Jail, may
have suggested to her the idea OF hei
tongue being too big for her mouth.
But when the prosecutor sought tC
press this hard won point and askeC
the defendant II DR.. Wight had moi
talked to her about mental disturb
ances, she replied in her usual dreary
toneless voice, II really don't re.
member"
o.-About that fall from the auto,
mobile in Chile. Isn't It fact that
you went to a dance that same night,
Al don't think so.
Q.-Didn't you tell Mrs. Mooney
when you got home that night thai
she had been complimented on the
neatness and beauty of the bandagS
she put on your head?
Al don't remember.
Q.-Didn't Felipe Cortez call or
you next day and apologize to you
and didn't you gracefully accept his
apology?
Al don't remember such an Incl
dent.
Judge Warns the Jury.
In announcing a recess, Justice Man
ming admonished the Jury not to show
any partisanship one way or another
until the case was fully completed.
The entire picture IS being I'M
folded in a proper. orderly and dig
nified manneT-the manner in which
desire and am trying to have It ap,
pear to you" said the court, "and ]
warn you not to form any opinion un,
til the whole picture is unfolded be.
fore you"
You must not take sides at this
time" concluded the justice.
Upon resuming the stand after the
recess Mrs. De Saulles was asked II
she were not a devout Roman Catho,
lie.
81 am" she said.
Q.-And yet you secured a divorce?
Al did.
Mr.. Weeks abruptly dropped this
line OF Questioning and asked about
a deed she signed to the East Sew
enty-eighth street property. She ad-
mitted signing It, but added that she
didn't know anything about IT.
Another paper containing her sig
nature, which was a stipulation turn
ing over all of her Chilean property
and properties in New York and else
where to her husband. was handed TO
her by District Attorney Weeks. She
identified the signature as hers. An
other document giving De Saulles
power OF attorney was offered in evil
dence without objection by the de-
fendant.
All ha ouaFIah1a
in the business transactions between
Mrs. De Saulles and her husband were
put into the record.
"At that time did you receive a
pearl stick pin?" asked the prose-
cutor, referring to the Arrangement
mentioned in a receipt signed by
her in August, 1916, for $500 alimony
and $3.50 on account 4 furniture.
"Nes. It was mine" replied the de-
fendant-
Financial Deals Taken Up.
Anote for $4,000, dated May 4. 1916,
signed by Mrs. De Saulles. was shown
her By Mr.. Weeks.
Odd you go alone 10 the bank
to execute this note?
Al did.
o.-And did you pay any part of
that note?
A.-Yes, did.
Q.-What part did you pay?
A.-The part Mr.. De Saulles didn't
paw.
The prosecutor showed Mrs. pe
Saulles another note for $4,000, also
checks for 81 900. $500, $500, 5000 and
one dated January 81, 1912, S517.9J, all
signed John L. De Saulles.
,Q.-Tour husband paid all these
did he not7
A.-Yes.
Q.-Didn't Mr.. C. w. Heckscher ad-
vance E4,l5O for your account which
was subsequently repaid by your
husband2
AIN one sum?
The Court-In checks agEregating
that Rmount7
A.-Mr. Heckscher probably ad-
vRnced those sums. don't remember.
o. show you another check for
$1,000 dated March o, 1915, and ask
II Mr.. Heckscher didn't advance that
sum to you while Mr.. de Saulles was
away?
A-Hs probably did,