Arizona republican., 1917-11-09
COURT HANDS DOWN bIG
 LIT DECISIONS

That the entire time of the supreme court has not been taken up in the consideration of the governorship con test was evident yesterday when that high tribunal handed down g large number of decisions.
 Ten appealed cases were affirmed, one was revised and dismissed, one dismissed for want of prosecution, an application for a writ of prohibition was denied, a motion to dismiss an ap- peal was denied as was a motion for a rehearing, and an attorney was dis barred. Following are the decisions:
 Charles R. Jarvis, KS. Chanslor and Lyon and R. L. Newman, sheriff of Navajo county, motion to dismiss ap- peal denied.
 R. R. Richardson vs. Francis J. Hen ey and Ben Heney, motion for rehear- ing denied
 Llanos de Gro Mining and Milling company vs W. P. McComas, appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
 First National Bank of Globe vs Mary McDoaough and Mary McDon- ough as eXecutrix of the estate of J. N. McDonough, and E. F. Pfister and George E. Shute, judgment affirmed.
 First National Bank of Globe vs. Mary McDonough and Mary McDon- ough as execufor of the estate of J. N. McDonough, and Thomas P. Kelly, John r. Shaw and Wade Solet, judg- ment affirmed
 W. W. Bush and Asa Brown vs State of Arizona, judgment affirmed
 In the matter of John P. Conmy attorney at law, convicted of a felony, ordered license of said John P. Con my be superseded and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
 John C. Adams vs. Superior Court of MaricOpa county. Application for writ of prohibition denied.
 Ralph H. Cameron vs. w. W. Bass, judgment affirmed.
 Nogales Electric Light, Ice and Water company vs. International Gas com pany judgment affirmed
 Irving Lockwood vs. J. T. Lockwood, Judgment affirmed.
 In the matter of the estate of An nie Wilson, deceased, Manual Escalada, appellant vs. John W. Wilson, judg ment affirmed.
 Southern Pacific company and South ern Pacific Railway company vs. Yuma county, judgment affirmed.
 s. c. Valentine vs. Eugene Shepherd, reversed and remanded with direc- tions to dismiss complaint.
 Frank Wootan vs. Dan. A. Rotten, judgment affirmed.
 Eugene s. Ives vs. Gunther R. Les sing, judgment affirmed.
 John P. Conmy, the attorney dis barred by the supreme court from fur ther practice in the courts of Arizona, had been convicted of the crime of forgery at Florence.
 The affirming of the judgment of the lower court in the case of Eugene $. Ives vs. Gunther R. Leasing recalls the smuggling of six bars of bullion across the Mexican line into Arizona by Man uel Gonzales and Arturo Ponce who were arrested. Ives defended the Mex jeans and also was retained in the fight to prevent the bullion from being confiscated by the United States gov ernment.
 He sued for attorneys fees and for money advanced to the defendant, and recovered judgment in the lower court, which now has been affirmed.
 The appeal case of s. c. Valentine vs. Eugene Shepherd was suit for damages for alleged breach of con- tract in the sale by contract of a cer- tain number and brand of cattle, the indefinite wording of the contract being the basis of the suit.
 Extortion was the charge in the case of w. w. Bush and Asa Brown, ap- pellants, vs. State of Arizona, appealed from Pinal county.
 Arthur Sellick, son of Mrs. Hannah L. Young, forged the name of W. T, Armstrong to 8. check for twenty five dollars. Bush, marshal of Winkelman, arrested Sellick and in company with Brown went to the home of Mrs. Young whom they found in bed, ill. Under threat to put her son lover the road, they induced the aged woman to sign a certain bill of sale.