The Pulaskian., 1917-06-01
SUPERINTENDENT
 PROBABLY LOST
co,JNTY SUPERVISION OF THE SCHOOLS SEEMS TO HAVE FAILED OF RECEIVING
 A MAJORITY.

conT@y supervision of schools seems to have been defeated in the annual election on May 12, the latest figures chewing ,o46 for and 1,f2S against it ,rbare are few districts cut yet, b1t it has been losing from the first. Tistriets have made the following returns:
 9s7. against 101.
 Faulkner spscial-For supervision against '; ' mills tax; D. H. Hais- lip c. W. Harril, c. G. Fortson, di- reetors.
 Highland Special-For supervision E. against 1; mills tax; John Tippit and James Hanley, directors.
 Jacksonville SpeciaI-For supervi. siol 20, against 3; 12 mills tax; P. W. Dnnree and w. T. Mcbride, directors. Iedwidge Special-For supervision against 2; F mills tax; F. M. Wes- terfeld and A. M Dale, directors.
 Little Rock Special-For supervi- sion 464, against 233; 10 mills tax. Mabelvale Special-Against super vision &; 10 mills tax; H. Merchant and H. B. Hopkins, directors.
 Scott Special-Against supervision S4: ' mills tax; w H. Buchanan and |. R. Crittenden, directors.
 Tate Mill Special-For supervision 2 against II; 12 mills tax; W. W. scruggs and Bob Carmichael, direc- tors.
 Warsaw Special-For supervision g. against 9; 12 mills tax; s. J. Holt and L. A. Peters, directors.
 No. For supervision 1, against 10. 12 mills tax; J. M Turner, diree- tor.
 No. S-For supervision 0, agains. 22; 8 mills tax.
 No. For supervision s, against 2; 12 mills tax; c. s. Smead, direc- tor
 No. Against supervision IF, for O. mills tax; J. H. Laster and M, J. Peters, directors.
 No. 8-Against supervision 10; mills tax; Gus Toney, director.
 No. 9-For supervision 13, against IS; Chas. Hardcastle, director.
 No. 10-For supervision 1, against If; Frank Zazak, director.
 No. 14-For supervision 1, against 42; 7 mills tax; B. F. Dreher, direc- tor
 No. 15-For supervision 13, against ,; mills tax; Ed Dixon, director. No. 16-Against supervision 23; foS c; mills tax
 No. 17-For supervision 9, against 2; mill tax.
 No. 18-For supervision E, against 20; 10 mills tax; Will Cook and G. Guenther, directors,
 No. 19-Against supervision 43; 12 mills tax; J. D. Jones and Sam Stew art, directors
 No. 21-No vote on supervision; [ mills tax; B. F. Thompson, director. No. 22-For supervision 23, against ?; ' mills tax; M L. Brownless, di- rector.
 No, 23-Against supervision 25; 10 mills tax; Dock Hatchett, director. No. 24-Against supervision 12; ) mills tax; c. G. Roberts, director. No. 26-For supervision 8, against l3; 12 mills tax Emile Schlegel, di- rector.
 No. 27-For supervision, I9; mills tax; M L. Watson, director.
 No. 2S-Against supervision, [; 10 mills tax; Arthur Schmeckenbergef and Arthur Squires, directors.
 No. 29-For supervision 1, against 20; 5 mills tax; H. E. Cape, direc- tor.
 No. 3O-For supervision II, against Z; 12 mills tax; c. c. Wicker, direc- tor.
 No. 32-For supervision 2, against g.. 2 mills tax; J, T. Lawrence, direc- tor
 No. 33-Against supervision g; ' mills tax; R. E. Douglass, director. No. 35-Against supervision 36, for U; l2 mills tax; J. R. Schaer, director. No. 41-For supervision 1, against 70; l2 mills tax; G. w. Ellis, direc- tor.
 No. 43@For supervision 6. against 10; mills tax; Henry Hill, director. No. 45-Against supervision 20, for U mills tax; H. M. Graham and L. l. Farrell, directors.
 POSTMASTER AT LEW