Arizona republican., 1917-11-06
SAYS HER CHILDREN DR. BO|DO'S;; THAT
 SHE LIED BEFORE

Declaring that she had perjured her self before the grand jury in the aU- tumn of 1916, when she denied that pr. Lorenzo Boido was the father of her children, Dorothy St. Claire yesterday testified that the physician was the father of 3-vear-old Harold and Of Dorothy, aged ,.
 Later in the day she heard Raymond Alles, who reported the grand jury in vestigation, read from his notes where she had said: You people have it against Dr. Boido, but there is nbth- ing to it. He has a bad name in this town, but he is not the father of these children. Donald St. Claire is.''
 The St. Claire girl brought suit against Dr. Boido some weeks ago, and the preliminary examination was con- tinued from time to time because of the county attorneys being engaged in criminal matters in the superior court. The announcement that it would be held yesterday brought an unusual number of spectators to Justice Wheele CTS court A new furnace was being tried out in the building and the court room was clouded with smoke. Despite this fact, the women, for they were practically all women who came to hear
  pointed 50 or more who were compelled to forego the prospect of hearing some spicy testimony when Judge Barnum, for the defense, requested the court to exclude all witnesses and spectators.
 Tells Her Story
 The first witness called was the St Claire woman, who, under oath, stated that she had been brought to Phoenix in October, 1913. by Dr. Rosa Goodrich Boido, wife of the defendant, from Tue son to cook for the family. Almost inn mediately on her arrival at their home her relations with Dr. Boido began, she said, and their first child was born on July l. She told in her testimony of living at the Boido home and of her subsequent homes in the city for which she said the rents were paid by Dr. Boido. Mrs. Boido, she claimed, sup ported their second child.
 Under cross examination Dorothy testified she was somewhere around 21" She knew positively she was not 22 She was reminded that she had registered and voted last year, but said that was done at the instance of Dr. Rosa Boido This was denied by Mrs Dr. Boido.
 She was asked by Judge Barnum if it were not fact that she had testified before the grand jury that she was married to a man by the name of St. Claire. She admitted that she had, declaring that she had been intimi- dated by Dr. Boido, who had threatened her.
 Says There's No St. Claire
 Did not County Attorney Candy ad- monish you to tell the truth? No one was present but the jury, the county attorney and the court reporter. Miss Gilchrist went for you and you saw no one else. Why did you say you were married to St. Claire if it was not true?"
 T was told to-"
 Who told you how to testify today?" asked counsel for the defense.
 What I told here is, the truth re piled the witness. just as she replied when County Attorney Candy urged her to tell the truth.
 On redirect examination the witness testified that no such man as St. Claire existed, but that Dr. Rosa Boido told her to testify that MT. St. Claire died in Mexico and left her no money, while on re-croSs- examination she testified that it was not the doctors wife, but himself who told her what to state to the grand jury. She said that she might have said that St. Claire left her some money and did not remember, and might have testified before the grand jury that St. Claire was alive and had their marriage certificate
 It developed during the course of the trial that the St. Claire girl had gone to Dr. Rosa Boido and asked her to find d home for her children and that she had signed paper giving them up. She had done this at the instance of a Greek she was to marry, but when he