Norwich bulletin., 1917-10-20
TWO WIVES FREED
 FROM UNWORTHY HUSBANDS
Michael, GeIinski Left Wife After Two Week-Robert J. Smith Was . Drunkard, and Cruel to Wife.

| A short calendar session of ! the I Windham County superior court was held in the superior court room at the town hall, Friday morning, Judge Kel- !, lcgg presiding. Two divorce cases were heard and the following cases were assigned Jackson & Sumner vs Hartford Build | CTS Finish Co., first case October 23; Leander Wright vs Charles T. Crane, lsecond case October 23: M. Eugene case October 23; Ichimatsu Nishi vs. William J. Miller, first case October li24 Ignavio Longo vs. Arthur c. Bill, second case October "A: Jake Berko- and Horace Price. first case October 25; Jake Berlxowitz vs Harry Gluber- man, second case October 25: Henry Raciot vs Charles Mulligan, first case Howard, second case October 30; Ev- erett F. Chappeil vs Joseph Nohei- mer October 31: P. H. Mccarthy ct al. appeal from probate Page will easel to jury Nov. 1S
 Most of the cases on the short cal endar list were put off for couple of weeks to allow the attorneys to file answers.
 Husband Left After Two Weeks.
 The first case taken up was the un- contested divorce case of Mary Ge- linski vs. Michael Gelihski, on the grounds of desertion. The couple were married in Lowell, Mass, May IT. 1910. The nationality of MT. Ge- llnski was not known, but he spoke both Polish and English. The couple lived together for two weeks, and then the husband left, saying that he was married to another woman. He said nothing else and nothing. has since been heard from him. Mrs. Gelinski then came to this city where she has resided for ve years. She has a child of six and one-half wears The d. vorce was granted and she was given the custody of the child.
 lntemperate, Cruel Husband.
 The uncontested divorce case of Mrs. Grace Smith vs. Robert J. Smith was then taken. the plaintiff asking the divorce on the grounds of habitual in- temperance and intolerable cruelty. The couple were married in October Is. 1915. at Manchester. Conn. After the marriage they went to live with Mir. Smiths parents in Manchester. He began to drink, getting drunk ev- cry night. Mrs. Smith tried to reform him. Instead of accomplishing this she got into trouble with him and they went to live with his aunt. Matters here were worse as the aunt was common drunkard and both used to drink every night The husband did not support himself and Mrs. Smith worked in the and 10 cent store and played in moving picture houses to support herself. She also paid for her husbands support, and once she bor- rcwed SIS from her parents at South Coventry. She left him twice: the first time he came to her home and asked her to return. promising to re- form but he was drunk before they got back to Manchester. The next time she left him for good. His mother said that he was worse than ever. The divorce was granted.
 The Jury Panel.
 Court adjourned at 11.15 until next Tuesday morning at 10.l15.
 The following were drawn as jury men to serve at this term of the court: Windham, George K. Ander- son and Roderick Young: Putnam, Eugene Brousseau and John O. Fox; James Kent, Burdett c. Hopkins and Fred c. Leavens; Plain field, Arthur. w Davis, Charles F. Burgess and Clark B. Gallup: Wood stocy, Mercy Ross and Harold c. Iib- bard; Thompson, Barton W. Jacobs; Sterling, Harry e. Barr. Scotland, M. Burnham; Pomfret Geo. Hicks; Hampton, William c. Oliver; Eastford A. G. Morse; Chaplin, Bur ton M. Welch; Canterbury, Freeman Christian; Ashford, Justin NJ. Burrill; Brooklyn, Leslie J. Tanning.