Norwich bulletin., 1917-02-17

| In the superior court at New Lon | don Friday, with Judge Joseph F. Tut l tie on the bench. James Coady of Bal
 tic was granted a divorce rom ms 1 unknown on the grounds of desertion. l They were married May 30. 1905 both l having been once before married, the | petitioners first wife dying and the her first husband. They were living | in Durand, Wis, when the separation came, Mrs. Coady leaving her hus-
 band because she said there was too much work in keeping his house and farm. He said that he always pro- vided a good home and he gave her no cause. He saw her last four years ago
 while he was on visit in Durand. granted a divorce from his wife. Jen- nie Mover Davis on the grounds of desertion. They were married October i 8, 1889 in South Bethlehem. Pa Davis testified that he had lived in Fishers Island, Groton and Noank at various times in following out his business of fisherman and boatman. The separa- tion came in 1910 in Groton when to Noank on account of his work and his wife refused to go there and went to her home where she now is.
 Judge Futile heard the divorce case
 don against James D. Latham of parts
 unknown. Mrs. Latham sought sepa-
 ration on the grounds of habitual in-
 temperance.
 MT; and Mrs Latham were mar ried Jan. 4. 1881. Mrs. Latham said
 that for five years after they were married her husband was sober and
 industrious. Then he got into bad company and began to drink and for the next 20 years he was habitually intoxicated and abused her. He would go on sprees varying from few days to weeks and then he would come and strike and abuse her and
 one time he threatened to kill her.
 however, he always promised to re- form but he would do the same thing again in a few days. ..
 Two years ago he left home saying that he was going to work for The Chappen CO. and he has not been heard or seen since then. Mrs. La than learned that he did not go to work for The Chappen Co. Mrs. La tham said that during three years prior to his disappearance her hug band was arrested twice on her com plaint because he was intoxicated and came home and smashed the furni- / Short calendar matters were dis posed of as follows:
 Bartlett, IT., vs. Potter. admr., ct al. ruling on defendants demurrer, was for a further allowance, as provided in public acts. 1913. chapter 53; one hun dred dollars allowed to prevailing par ty. Johnson vs. Marsh, ct al, default for failure to plead, went off. Anna don, admr., vs. German Ocean Navi- gation Co.,. Ltd., argument of demur- Ter, was postponed Davidson, admr. vs. German Ocean Navigation Co., Ltd. Argument of demurrer. was postponed. Hull admr.. Duzant vs German Ocean Navigation Go. Ltd. Argument of de- murrer, was postponed. Hull, admr., Gurney vs. German Ocean Navigation O., Ltd. argument of demurrer, was postponed. Hull. admr., Jackson vs. German Ocean Navigation Co.,, Ltd. Argument of demurrer. was postponed. Norris S. Lippitt, ct al., bank com missioners vs. Order authorizing the receiver to declare and pay a third dividend to depositors in the com mercia1 department, was granted. Car rie Douglass vs Ralph H. Douglass. 1. Default for failure to enter appear ance within 90 days of the first Tues day of November, 1916, was denied: 2, default for failure to plead, answer ordered in one week: 3. that case ! placed on uncontested list for failure to plead. was denied. Attini vs. Avery. Order that case be put on jury list,