Tulsa daily world. [volume] (Tulsa, Indian Territory [Okla.]) 1905-1919, 1917-06-24

tonl1.ons shosH - ss1s4 % ansei-
are - Nee1 Eat4c-zl-s+s ard T. s+er-
r.e- - 41A4 .s crepcs-srr .s- -
a1 ~ - rsp,rrst mat ths pre-
N-~rs f.erlss.s - 49,. rc- rssE = .
Ar1 VIZ +r.-. fE=Jf Why Erg1E
Grsss brtsin ~ - roll fn- o1F1en
= h@r rsaslrs. 1...'4es % the sh1.Lc-
- - Csrzcz arf Azrrts, Thsse
ec4n-rifa have f1lf - aga4E zrd aEsIn
Thzf raay th.rk q re irtEc e--s,-Dr
arf . "a f0f Gr%a. BRIAN Asrsei: %
areeg+ M rfPp0ugit4,ty
Tss 'e1srsI rC!.c1n. ilvo.virs ;hs
fcar l-fs aegafatc1 = Ireland from
ne Tri-sd Elrgco,1 and her zccs-Dt-
erre = mo gtzr1s llke that q me
sslf s0vsrrir1 cGnnin!srz. Nr D1iS1
-s,ee'~c 90 'o9 eTf-erre for cracriczI
lnsofFs" - Galc. "a nun h~r e inf-!-
rate arrsrs ssrnsnra for rhleh Br-tlc-
pgblic Opln.on ~ not Jet prepared
u Eil - time s1Ogrh " G.scuEs ted
srs sIlar When ne home rgis prfu-
rIpie rss feSn definitely sa's bIisneG
and ~ srtl~ily 2, vDrs IN IrsisnG-
Home Ruiz Wm Defeat EIfr,nIists
Asksc ab1gt The sinn Fsin snoye-
rnsnt. NJ rI.On lntlmaise that moth
INK bat the intrDc sciiSn % hOHl-
rule N!ii defeat the e1frsuslsfS He
eisf ssA4 the election al South LING
fDrd. IN which Binn FEN candidate
nan 90 prlspn in England and a.
fsb@l Has chOsen despite The slolen.
sffor's - ne Escmondlfss Ar Dil-
lon hinnef ram Dai1red IN this cDn-
s'itBsncy, and aid one II the re-
nsrkahle features n the cangsA Was
the Appearance IL one hundred auto
mobiles ,htalnsf by Sim Feiners do
'Dite the eminent restrictions on
thH uee ~ ncfrr spirit There mas
. yre1t dcal II Intimidation" he said
and the curious thing VAS that In
many caaeH pressure Wan exercised
m vot"ra by member ~ their own
rolnr holfe IN one Instance the
daughter II farmer said she WourG
no or coD< FOR him agalu u he failed
to support tho Sim Feip candlGote.
The mOscnsnf la largely ono Of
yDunH men. and young women. u is
following new lines u division. not
religious 0r racial but cauglng cleav.
ages within families such aH We have
nat peen since the Parncil split The
trouble ia hat young people IN Ire
lana as iu even country. knOW Iit'l,
~ The national history 0f the l1a.
thirty year, what they have been
taught is The history of hfty Or a
hundred or thDuaaud years aRO.
The recent events that would allay
the bitterness against England they
know nothing about
But the comparative success or
the Finn Fcin agitation must BE-
ascribsd % the cumulative effect ~ a
s"rieH ~ events producing the conric-
ton that the British government does
not mean business that all the time
u has only been playing with the frian
people. and that its Dromlacg and its
pledges arc absolutely worthless First
~ all there was tho lesson taught By
Fir Edward Carson He tried the
weapon Of constitutional agitation.
ana no attention WaH paid 10 him
Then be started armlnH and drilling
and preparing for a revolution. and
openly threatened rebellion Where
upon British ministers. instead of
runirhing him and his followers.
yielded 10 him and found salvation
lu the formula that n iA unthlnkabl-
10 cocfcc Ulster.
Believe In Force
This surrender Of the government
caused the Nationalist of ireland 70
believe that you must prod John Buli
with q bayonct before he viii listen
10 you Hut the most disasterous in
flucncc Of MI has been the cours,,
followed during and after tho rebel
lion In Dublin last year. For tnr-c
hundred years no one had been exc
cuted In Great Britain or ireland as
the result of secret court martiais
DO you realize that up 10 the present
moment there has not been published
r. single word Of the evidence on the
strength Of which the men who were
executed were convicted and shot ?
Tho late Prime Minister promised mo
In the house of commons that this
evidence should be made public. bat
'hc now government has refused 10
honor the pledge Then there wa.
tho wholesale arrests Of mon. many Of
whom had no more 10 do with the re
volt thnn you had The military
swept the country SELLING men right
and left, taking everybody the police
had any motive for wishing TO get
into prison"
Lord MacDonneU Of Swinford. un-
der-aocrctary to ireland for six years
and warm nrvOcntc Of home rule.
consented to tho publication OF his
vlcwH regarding the present position
OF Ulster. 80 far AA ! know NJ pres
emit" he said "Sir Edward Carson
and his friends maintain now the
same impractlcablc attitude which
they took up before the war rney
insist today na In 1914, on partition
OF ireland. and the exclusion from the
of all the six northeastern counties
I have seen II stated that all couces-
Hions on tho question have hitherto
come from tho side Of Ulster while
from the Nationalist side there nan
been no concession at all That seems
to mo an amusing travesty OF the
factA,
Discuss llstcrItcs.
what In brief. has been the attl-
tude OF the Ulster party since the In
PRODUCTION into parliament OF the
home dulc bin OF r9122
Their attitude at the outset was one
OF absolute refusal to consider tho
question OF home rule ON any terms
whatever. Their cry was. we will
not have home dulc In ireland.
when public opinion I'm Great Britain
and the process OF events made that
attitude untenahlo. II was followed by
what was called the policy of the
clean cut--thc exclusion OF all Ulster
fr0m the jurisdiction OF the Irish par
Lament Hut there are several coun-
tics In Ulster with populations as pre-
dominanty Nationalist as Limerick or
Tippcrary, and when this fact came
home TO the mind OF the parliament.
the clcnn-cut policy had to be aband-
oncd. The final claim put forward
was the exclusion of the six north
eastern counties, In which the strength
OF Ulster unionism IL concentrated.