The Brinkley argus. (Brinkley, Ark.) 1883-current, 1917-05-04

position, its aims; and so far as ex-
ternal conditions will permit, the re-
suits which it accomplishes.
One dislikes intensely to criticise
his own country, even to himself. But
when a naval officer 10 studying-as
he should continually do-what must
be done, in order to protect his coun-
try from attack by some foreign Zoe,
1t would be criminal folly for him TO
estimate the situation otherwise than
honestly; and to do this, 1t is neces-
sary to try to see where his coun-
try is weak and where strong, rela-
lively to the possible foes in question.
II we do this, and compare the stra-
tegical methods employed by-say Ger
many and us-we are forced to admit
that the German methods are better
adapted to producing economically
navy fitted to contend successfully
in war against an enemy. In Ger
many the development OF the navy
has been strictly along the lines
of a method carefully devised before
hand; in our country no method what
ever is apparent, at least no logical
method. Congress, and Congress alone,
decides what vessels and other craft
shall be built, how many officers and
men shall wear the uniform. 1t Ia true
that they consult the report OF the
Secretary of Navy, and ask the opin'
ions of some naval officers; and 1t is
true that the Secretary of Navy gets
the opinions of certain naval officers
including the General Board, before
making his report. But both the Sec
rotary and Congress estimate the sit
uation from their own points OF view.
and place their own value on the ad-
vice of naval officers. And the advice
Of these naval officers is not so val
liable, possibly as it might be; for the
reason that it is really irresponsible,
since the advisers themselves know
that 1t will not be taken very seri-
ously. The difference between the
advice of men held responsible for
the results of following their advice,
and the advice of men not so held
responsible, is we'll recognized, and
is discussed fully in the reports Of
the Moody and the Swift Boards on
the organization OF the Navy Depart
ment. Furthermore, our officers do
not have the machinery Of the Krieg-
spiel to help them. 1t is true that
at the Naval War College, war
game apparatus is installed and that
war games are played. and war prob
lens are solved; but the officers are
very properly engaged in the regular
work of a war college, in educating
officers in the principles of warfare,
and have little time for other work
It is also true that the war games and
problems there do lead occasionally to
recommendations by the War College
to the General Board as to various
matters; but the connection between
the conclusions of the War College
and the decisions OF Congress via the
General Board and the Secretary OF
Navy Is so fragile and discontinuous
that It may truthfully be said that the
influence OF the war games at our
War College has but a faint resem.
blance to the determining force OF the
Kriegspiel In Berlin.
A Suggestion From France
II Is often said that Germany is an
empire and the United States a re.
public. and that therefore the military
methods OF Germany cannot be EN-.
ployed here. The inference Is NOT
necessarily correct. however, as Is
shown by the exceliency Of the army
OF France. for France, although a re-
public, insists that military strategy
only shall control and direct the army
The American Congress can do the
same with the American Navy. Wheth.
or Congress shall 80 decide or not
the decision will undoubtedly be wise
and we OF the navy will do our ut,
most to make the navy all It should
be. In this connection, Il should be
noted that:
1. Germany has been following a
certain strategic system regarding the
n