The Colville examiner. [volume] (Colville, Wash.) 1907-1948, 1917-04-07


and Related System Nssdsd-Fsdsral
Incorporation Of Railroads by Gsnsr.
al Law Favored.
Washington, March 26.-Responsibil.
ity for the railway development Of the
country, for providing necessary trans
portation facilities to care for the grow.
Ing business and population Of the
country, now rests largely with con.
gress and not entirely with the rail.
road managers. This was the state
ment Of Judge Robert s. Lovett, chair
man Of the executive committee Of the
Union Pacific system, to the Newlands
joint congressional committee when
that body resumed its inquiry into
the subject Of railroad regulation this
week.
In making this statement Of the
changed conditions of the railroad sit
uation Judge Lovett undoubtedly had
In mind the decision Of the supreme
court on the Adamson law, handed
down last week, which establishes the
right Of the federal government to fix
railroad wages and to prevent strikes
This decision is regarded by railroad
men and lawyers as marking an epoch
in the development Of transportation
in the United States.
I'VE have our share of responsible.
ity," said Judge Lovelt, "but it rests
primarily on congress. When the gov
ernment regulates the rates and the
financial administration OF the rail.
roads, the borrowing of money and the
issuance of securities it relieves the
railroad officers Of HE responsibility Of
providing and developing transporta-
tion systems. except within the limits
Of the revenue that can be realized from
such rates and under such restrictions.
"For Il country such as ours, for
people situated us we are, to blunder
along with Il series Of unrelated, incon-
sistent conflicting statutes enacted by
different states without relation to
each other, instead of providing COM
plete and carefully studied and pre-
pared system of regulation for u busi-
ness that Is SO vital to the life of the
nation, is worse than folly"
He summed up the present problems
and difficulties Of the railroads as fol-
lows:
FirSt.-Thc multiplicity of regula.
tiOns by the several states with respect
to the issue of securities, involving de-
lays and conflicting stale policies gen.
orally dangerous and possibly disas-
trOus
Second. The state regulation Of
rates I'm such II manner ns to unduly
reduce revenues, to discriminate in fa-
vor of localities and shippers within
Its own borders uS against localities
and shippers In other states and to dis
turb and disarlnnge the structure Of
interstate rates
Thlrd.-The inability Of the Inter-
state Commerce Commission, whoever
the commissioners may be, to perform
the vast duties devolving upon it un-
der existing laws, resulting III delay
which should never occur In CONNER
cial matters-and compelling the COM
missiOners to accept the conclusions of
their employees as final in deciding
muttCIS VI cut W tuC
commercial and railroad interests of
the country.
Fourth.-The practical legality that
has been accorded conspiracies to tic
up and suspend the operation Of the
railroads OF the country by strikes and
violence and the absence Of any law
to compel the settlement Of such dis
putes by arbitration or other judicial
means, as all other issues between citi-
Zens in civilized states are to be set
tied.
Fifth.-The phenomenal increase In
the taxation Of railroads In recent
years.
SiXth.-The cumulative effect of
these conditions upon the investing
public, to which railroad companies
must look for the capital necessary to
continue development
1--WE believe that the unifcation of
regulation IL essential" said Judge
Lovett, "and that with the rapid in.
crease Of state commissions In recent
PEELED to exercise its power In the
premises. To unity regulation there
should be complete, harmonious, con-
sistent and related system. We be-
lieve the best, If not the only practical
plan, is the federal Incorporation Of
railroads by general law, which will
make incorporation hereunder COM
pulsOry thus imposing on ali railroad
companies throughout the United
States the same corporate powers and
restrictions with respect to their hnan-
clal operations and the same duties
and obligations to the public and the
government, SO that every investor will
know precisely what every railroad
corporation may and may not lawfully
do"
Judge Lovett contended that the 80
luton OF these problems and difficult
ties rested with congress. He told the
committee that under the constitution
the authority Of the federal govern.
ment Is paramount, that congress has
the power to leglslate for a centralized
control OF railroads under federal char
ters and that 1t only remains for that
body to exercise that power.