Bisbee daily review. [volume] (Bisbee, Ariz.) 1901-1971, 1917-09-22
DISTRICT BOARD ASKS
FOR INFORMATION IN
ALL EXEMPT CASES

"All claims for exemption allowed
by the district exemption board are
subject to reconsideration and if any
person knows any facts which tend
to show that the board in this dis
trict has made a mistake in allowing
a claim. we shall be glad to receive
that information" said d. H. Clar,
idge, president of the board at Tucson
yesterday.
The board has been criticized in
some quarters for allowing claims
for exemption by parties who prob
ably are in possession of facts not
before the board and 1t is for this
reason that the board invites the sub
mission of evidence not before them.
I'VE must act on the evidence be-
fore u.s." continued Senator Claridge.
This must be supplied by the party
applying for the exemption. While
evidence must be in affidavit form,
we viii appreciate information not
under oath which will lead US to dis
close evidence which we can obtain
in a legal manner.
We do not want to be a party
to assisting any Stacker to escape
service. We are giving our time
and careful attention to all claims
and passing upon them in the light
that is before us, but all claims are
subject to reconsideration and action
is not necessary final and we will
reconsider our course where evil
dence is presented which warrants
us doing So"
New Cases Filed.
A number of new claims for ex.
empticn were filed with the district
board today.
Savo Gojokovich of Bowie asked
for exemption on industrial grounds.
He says he has 80 acres in pink beans
and 5000 goats.
Fred Anderson of Douglas asked for
exemption on the ground of being a
fireman for the Z. p. & S. w.
Mike Port of Bisbee appealed on the
ground of physical disability.
VIM. f. Watt of Bisbee appealed,
alleging dependent and infirm parents.
Enrique Albarez of Tucson appeal
ed on the ground of dependent par
ents.
Orman Raglan of Pima, Graham
county appealed on account of phys
ical disability.
Mike George Georges of Miami APP
pealed on account of physical disabi-
lily.
Marcus a Bonardy of Elfrida, Co
chise county. asked for 80 days to
harvest his crop.
Arthur L. Mills of Tucson appealed
On the ground of dependents.
Louis Massina of Silver City ap-
pealed on Industrial grounds, alleg-
ing he is employed by the Empire
z inc company and needed for the war
establishment
In the case of David F. Campbell
of Cochise county the action of the
district board in discharging him was
reversed on reconsideration, and he
was held for service.
In the case of Edgar Allen Craig of
Bisbee. who claimed a dependent
mother in Tennessee. the previous &C
ton was affirmed on reconsideration
and Craig was held for service.
The board reopened the case of Earl
n. Mckinney of Douglas and reversed
the previous action of both the local
and district boards, discharging Nc
Kinney.
Cochise County Cases.
Local board affirmed and held for
service: Clarence A. Caraway, VIM.
A. Jaliey, A. T. Arandulez, Max
SchaIlie, Albert DOmico. Lawrence
Mause, Earl R. Arborh, c. e. Mitch
all, R. 5. Goudge, Leo Trappman. Chas
Regner. r. A. Sail w. T. Worthing-
ton, Ben Critchelly.
Industrial claim denied and party
held: Dennis Sullivan, Arthur B.
Wells.