The Barre daily times. (Barre, Vt.) 1897-1959, 1917-03-15
COUNTY COURT BUSINESS.
Many Cases Settled and Discontinued
New Divorce Suits Entered.

When Washington county court opened
yesterday it was announced that q
cases on the regular docket, three chan
Gerry cases and four divorce actions hat
been settled and discontinued.
The cases on the regular docket set
tied and discontinued are: Mary Stew
ems VS.. George Mead, petition for petition
which has been under litigation since
the September term of court, 1891 and
was listed as the first case on the dock.
ct; Homer Freeman VS.. w. R. Elliott
apt, trover; William R. Elliott VS.. Hon.
er j. Freeman, trespass; Martin w
Wheelock VS.. Mary Il. Morse, apt, book ;
Della NJ. Lamery VS.. M. F. Coldini, bas-
tardy; Kenneth w. McAuley VS.. Henry
Bolles, apt, general assumpsit; " Z.
Ayers VS., Chelsea Electric Light & Pow
err Co., apt, general assumpsit; Wetmore
Morse Co., apt, VS.. estate of ID. F. Ryle
ct al, appeal from commissioners; town
OF Middlesex VS.. E. H. Deavitt, case !;
Levi Swift VS.. Fred P. Carlton, apt, gen
eral assumpsit; Luke J. Roberts VS.. Ira
o. Knapp, trespass; John Conoly vs. Al
den Foley. apt, general assumpsit;
George A. Foley vs., John Conoly, apt;
Nellie M. Morse, Administrative, VS.. j..
r. Town, book; Nellie NJ. Morse, admx.,
VS.. Margaret A. 0'Brien ct AL general
assumpsit; Hannah T. Gallagher vs.
Thomas Mcmahon, assumpsit; Hannah
T. Gallagher VS.. Mary Mcmahon, tres
pass; Joseph John vs.. John Anderson,
cave; Leander Bertrand VS.. John Ander-
son, case; n. Benedine vs. A. Crocke, gen.
eral assumpsit; Hattie Wheelock VS. the
estate of Omar Wheelock, Robert Wheel
ock, admir-, appeal from commissioners;
Nellie III. Morse, exr'x. VS.. Dorwin w.
Cooley and Waterbury Savings Bank &
Trust Co., general assumpsit; Nellie II.
Morse, extr'x., VS.. Dorwin w. Cooley and
the Waterbury Savings Bank & Trust
Co, tr. book; Luicius B. Davis vs.. ].
p. Rabidou ct al, replevin; Gardner Z.
Celley VS.. w. X Richner ct al. general
assumpsit; Edward H. Deavitt VS..
Charles f. kimball; Charles c. Brill, tr.,
VS.. Charles A. Miliken ct al, and the
Mortified Savings bank, tr.; Catherine
Sawtelle VS.. w. H. Farrar ct al, general
assumpsit; John S. Moloney vs.. Lewis N.
Stewart ct al, case; Swerdfeger & Davis
VS.. J. B. Pike, general assumpsit.
The following chancery cases were set |
tied and discontinued: Mary A. Stew
ems VS.. George Mead; j. Z. Goodenough |
VS.. Mead & Stevens; Stevens & Mead VS..
Eliza Goodenough.
These divorce suits were announced |
settled and discontinued: Julia Liber
sont vs.. George Libersont, separate main !,
tenance; George Libersont VS.. Julia Lib
ersont, divorce; Eva l.. Locklin VS.. Ar
thur W. Locklin; Shirley Walbridge VS..
Earl L. Walbridge.
The following new divorce suits have
been entered recently on the county
court docket:
Camille A. Belknap VS.. Guy Belknap;
Florence w. Wood VS.. Ira ]. Wood:
Frances c. Magoon VS.. Edgar c. Ma
COON; Ella NJ. LABEL VS.. Ellery LABEL;
Stewart Cunningham VS.. Aggie May Cum
nipgham; Irene L. Close VS.. William A.
Closes Robert w. Foster VS.. Article NJ.
Foster; Rose +. Baker VS.. William A.
Baker; Katherine f. Summers VS. Hen
" Summers; Leon II. Spaulding VS.. Mel.
lie Spaulding; Article NJ. Foster VS..
Robert w. Foster Sophia John VS.. Jo-
'eph John; Clarinda s. Hatch vs.. Will D.,
lam Hatch; Ella H. Russell VS.. Harry
VI Russell; Georgia A. Moody VS.. w. NJ.
Moody; Frank T. Bador VS.. Ellen L. Ba- {
Tor; Annie NJ. Vinton VS.. Fred G. Vim [
on; Nellie B. Spaultling VS.. Leon II.
spaulding; Rosa b. Moves VS.. Albert w. [
Noyes; Josie Mayo VS.. Moses Mayo;
Nary z. Smith VS.. Charles G. Smith. {