The twice-a-week Twin Falls times. (Twin Falls, Idaho) 1916-1918, 1917-05-24

such payment or to return or pay to |
it any part of the same.
Third Cause of Action.
The plaintiff for its third cause of
action against defendant alleges;
That it adopts paragraphs one and
two of first cause of action, and makes
the same part or this its third
cause.
That at various times between the
LIST day of January 1916, and the LIST
day of March, 1917, the Oregon Short
Line Railroad company, became and
was indebted to the plaintiff in the
sum of $104.69, which sum was by
the said Oregon Short Line Railroad
company during the period between
January LIST, 1916, and the LIST day of
March, 1917, paid to the said defend
ant for the use and benefit of this
plaintiff and the said sum was by him
converted and appropriated to his own
use, and to the use of his family and
to members thereof.
That plaintiff has demanded of the
said defendant that he make payment
to it of the sum so received from the
Oregon Short Line Railroad company.
and so Incorporated, but that he
has neglected and failed to make such
payment, or return, or pay to it any
part of same.
Fourth Cause of Action.
For fourth cause of action against
defendant plaintiff alleges:
That it adopts paragraphs one and
two of its first cause of action and
makes the same a part of this its
fourth cause of action.
II.
That in the month of November,
1916, at the suggestion of the defend
ant, he was permitted by the plaintiff
to make a trip through the middle
states for the purpose of investigat-
ing modern news paper business
methods, in large cities; That for the
purpose of bearing his expenses on
the trip, the company allowed $4,000,
in addition to his regular salary; That
in addition to this allowance he did
in the city of Battle Creek, Michigan,
on the 29th day of November, 1916,
check against and draw from the
funds of the plaintiff company, the
further sum of $500; that thereafter
he did, at Minneapolis, Mimi, on the
18th day of December, 1916. check
against and draw from the funds of
the plaintiff company, the further sum
of $4,000; that thereafter at Salt Lake
Der, 1916, he checked against and drew
from the funds of the plaintiff COM
pany, the further sum of $500. max
ing total of $4,000, thus drawn from
the funds of plaintiff without author
lty; that the said checks were by the
said defendant, withdraw from the re-
turn checks of the said company, and
concealed by him, from the officers
thereof, and were not charged up, by
him, to his personal account.
That plaintiff has demanded of the
defendant that he return to it, and
make payment of the sum so mis-
appropriated and diverted from the
funds of this plaintiff, but he has
neglected and failed to make such payI
ment or to return or pay to it any
part of the same.
Fifth Cause of Action.
For a fifth cause of action plaintiff
alleges:
That it adopts paragraph one and
two of its first cause of action and
makes the same part of this it's fifth
cause.
That at various times during the
year 1916, the Salmon River Settlers
association became and was indebted
to the plaintiff in the sum of $29.4O.
which sum was, by the said Salmon
River Settlers association, in the year
1916, paid to the said defendant for
the use and benefit of this plaintiff
and the said sum was, by him, con-
verified and appropriated to his own
use.
That plaintiff has demanded of the
said defendant that he make payment
to it, to the sum so received from the
said Salmon River Settlers associa-
ton, and by him misappropriated.
but that he has neglected and failed
to make such payment or return or
pay to it any part of the same
Sixth Cause of Action.
For the sixth cause of action plain
tiff alleges:
That it adopts paragraph one and
two of its first cause and makes the
same part of this, its sixth cause
II.
That at various times during the
year 1916, the defendant by means of
checks and by resort to the cash
drawer, took from the plaintiffs, sums
of money in excess of $494.76, the
exact amount plaintiff can not state
for the reason the defendant purloin-
ed the cash book and erased and mutt
lated the same and also failed to
make proper, or any charges or en-
try, in any record covering some of
said items.
That plaintiff has demanded of the
said defendant that he make payment
to it, of the sum so withdrawn from
the company funds and so misappro-
priated, but that he has neglected and
failed to make such Davmant IN. rat,,r,,