The citizen-Republican. (Scotland, Bon Homme County, S.D.) 1???-19??, 1917-04-19

lsUnincatton OF Regulation 10 EooontIaisH
A compIete, Harmonious, Iconslstsnt
and Related System Nesdsd sdsral
Incorporation Of Railroads BY 0sn6r.
al Law Favored.
Washington, March o6- Responsible
ity for the railway development Of the
country, for providing necessary trans
portation facilities to care for the grow
Ing business and population Of the
country, now rests largely with con.
gress and not entirely with ,the rail-
road managers. This was the state
ment OF Judge Robert s. I4ovett,. chair.
man OF the executive committee OF the
Union Pacific system, to the Newlands
joint congressional committee when
that body resumed It's inquiry into
the subject Of railroad regulation this
week.
In making this statement Of the
changed conditions Of the railroad sit
uation Judge Lovett undoubtedly had
in mind the decision OF the supreme
court on the Adamson law, handed
down last week, which establishes the
right Of the federal government to Ak
railroad wages and to prevent strikes.
This decision Is regarded BY railroad
men and lawyers as marking an epoch
in the development OF transportation
in the United States
We have our share Of Responsible
ity," said Judge Lovett, "but 1t rests
primarily on congress. When the gov
eminent regulates the rates and the
financial administration Of the rail
roads, the borrowing ofAmoney and the
issuance of securities 1t relieves the
railroad officers of the responsibility Of
providing and developing trnnsporta-
tion systems, except within the limits
of the revenue that cal, be realized from
such rates and under such restrictions.
For country such as ours, for a
people situated as we are. to blunder
along with a series OF unrelated, incon-
siatent, conflicting statutcs enacted by
different states without relation to
each other, instead of providing com.
plete and carefully studied and pre-
pared system Of regulation for bust
ness that is SO vital to the life OF the
nation, Is worse than folly
lie summed up the present problems
and difficulties Of the railroads as fol
lows:
Filst.-The multiplicity of reguia
tions by the several states with respect
to the issue of securities. involving &c.
lays and conflicting state policies gen
orally dangerous and possibly disas
trouS.
Second. The state regulation OF
rates In such q manner us to unduly
reduce revenues. to discriminate in ia.
vor Of localities and shippers within
its own borders as against localities
and shippers in other states and to dis
turb and disarrange the structure Of
interstate rates.
Third.-The inability Of the Inter.
state Commerce Commission, whoever
the commissioners may be, to perform
the vast duties devolving upon it un.
der existing laws, resulting In delay
which should never occur in CONNER
ciai inatters-and competing the com.
missioners to accept the conclusions of
their employees as final In deciding
matters Of great Importance to the
commercial and railroad interests of
the country.
Fourth.-The practical legality that
has been accorded conspiracies to tie
UP and suspend the operation of the
railroads Of the country by strikes and
violence and the absence Of any law
to compel the settlement of such dis
putes by arbitration or other judicial
means, as all other issues between citi-
zens in civilized states are to be set
tied.
Fifth.-The phenomenal increase In
the taxation of railroads in recent
years.
Sixth.-The cumulative effect of
these conditions upon the investing
public, to which railroad companies
must look for the capital necessary to
continue development.
"We believe that the uni6cation Of
regulation is essential" said Judge
Lovett, "and that with the rapid In
crease of state commissions in recent
years congress will In time be COM
PEELED to exercise it's power in the
premises. To unity regulation there
should be complete, harmonious, con-
| 'sistent and related system. We be-
lieve the best, il not the only practical
plan, is the federal Incorporation Of
railroads by general law, which will
make incorporation hereunder COM
pulsory, thus imposing on all railroad
companies throughout the United
States the same corporate powers, and
restrictions with respect to their fnan-
cial operations and the same duties