The Sauk Centre herald. (Sauk Centre, Stearns County, Minn.) 1886-current, 1917-02-22
CLOSE ELECTIONS.
Many Great Events Decided by a
Narrow Margin.
HISTORY MADE BY ONE VOTE.


great nation, as we'll as in the nation
at large itself. In the slatter class the
Tilden-H Hayes contest was the most
sensational. In that memorable cleo
ton the result turned upon the single
vote of the fifteenth member of the
electoral commission, who was chosen
by four judges of the supreme court.
Our history abOunds with instances
in which the course Of events has turn
ed upon single votes, and some of
them may he conveniently selected
from the compilation made by Speaker
Clark for one of his Chautauqua lee
lures. '...
General Jackson was elected major
general of Tennessee militia by one
majority. Without that one vote he
could not have fought the battle of
New Orleans, and politics would have
been different for quarter of a cen
fury.
Martin Van Buren, won the presi-
dency through his defeat by one vote
ON the confirmation Of his nomination
as minister to England.
John G. Calhoun, as vice president,
cast the deciding vote which gave to
| Van Buren, what Calhoun never got
for himself, although his claims were
not inferior. ..,
Edward Everett lost the governor
ship of Massachusetts, by one vote, and
that took him out of the list of avail
ables for the presidency.
Thomas Fl. Benton was elected to
the senate by single vote. The loss
of that one vote not only would have
cost him his career Of thirty years,
but would have meant the loss to the
| senate Of one Of it's strongest and most
famous members in most trying era.
One of the great characters of Ameri-
can history might never have emerged
| from Obscurity.
Henry Clay cast the deciding vote in
the constitutional convention which
admitted Kentucky to the Union as a
slave state. If Kentucky had entered
| the Union as a free state it is hardly
done the same, and it is conceivable
that there might have been no Mis-
souri, compromise, and perhaps even no
war between the states.
The Walker tariff passed the senate
| by single vote. Taft lost the vote of
Boise. If one more man had voted for
Taft Roosevelt would have lost con-
troll Of the state.
There is at least one case in which a
single vote was the entire election. At
the primaries for the Prohibition nomi-
nation for judge in Schuylllill county,
Pa, one vote was cast. There being
no other candidate or voter, Richard
II. Koch was unanimously chosen. A
miss is said to be as good as a mile,
and under some conditions one vote is
as good as a million.
On the other hand. majority OF
100000 may be worthless. as was ac-
tually the case in Indiana. At the gen
eral election in November, 1900. a pro
posed amendment that "the general as
sembly shall by law prescribe what
| qualifications shall be necessary for
admission to practice law to all courts
of Justice was submitted to the cleo
tors.
Nearly 100000 more votes were cast
for the amendment than against it.
But it did not receive a majority OF
the votes cast for presidential electors
and governor. The supreme court held
that it had not been carried by the con
stitutional majority required for the
ratification Of proposed amendment
That was q case where an actual ma
jority at the polls lost in the courts.
There would be no end to the prece
dents regarding the value of few
votes If the search were extended to
foreign history. One example will suf-
| fee to show that the count Of the votes
Is as important as the casting of them
In 1911 the MOnis ministry fell i'll
France because it was thought to be In
a minority of fourteen. when in fact ii
had q majority of five. According to
! the contemporary cablegram:
The crisis arose over an Interpolation
| regarding the attitude Of the government
as to the chief command Of the army in
| the event OIL war; dIlu TIC ohiCioi iio'
| showed 238 votes against the government
| and 224 in favor
| NJ Monis was still on sick bed as the
result of an accident and his colleagues
decided on resignation.
The curious fact has now been brought
to light however, that at the moment OF
| the fateful division there was consider
able confusion in regard to the votes for
| and against.
| number of deputies announced thai
their names had appeared on the wrong
division list. An official rectification was
made, with the result that so far from
having been defeated the government
had the narrow majority mentioned above
Though this discovery may be the
source of much personal satisfaction to
the ex-premier, it is, Of course. too late
| to affect the fate of his ministry.
These are cases merely Of misadven
ture in the working of the machinery
of voting. The cases of malicious falsi
flying of popular sentiment are too nu
merous to record.-New York Times.