New Ulm Post. [volume] (New-Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1864-1933, 1916-12-15
Ne1u lllm Nuneiota, 5reitas sen IS Seq 1916,

Geaember @erilbtster11tl1t
Gipil Salenber gebt in bie 8rndbe.
Surp Jdle pprsG Gnse Der MDdle erz
lebiat, Criminal 6dlie nadbite
@Dde.
Olontoamorgerl lpu1oe Der Iesenber-
GerihtStern,i,1 llnter 8orlit BON Ntd)z.
ter S; sc, gllerl er0finet. an otelen1,
O1oreen traten I'M IL llhr Die @roB9ez.
|id;morenell Sn1amme1l. Solepb w.
9(rbes m1lrbe als 9ornlann Der 0ronb
9urp er1,annt unb g. S. 9oufup bon
bielen ais Glerf ermdblt, Sobn gdape=
fotm iun9iert als Bailifi Ser @rono
s}urn u,b Soiepb @eiienborn 1lno Nnz
| ton Miesner alS 8ailifis Der Gletngez
{fmoreuen. 9llfreb gdlnmpberger
iunoirt al8 9eputp GeridtSldreiber.
Iie Wrobgeldmorenen be9aben li6
lofort an sic Nrbeit 1lnb fonnten lhon
N}ontaenodmittas fur5 Dor 5 llbr folz
oeuoe g(11flagen on boS gertdt eillbez
ridten: Geseu Nrt Senberlon alias
Son1es W}urpbp unb SameS Snrnes, je
cine Mufloee fir @roboiebitobi u1lb Girz
brl,d); oesen Glifforb 9enrp uno Nobert
2oftus, ie eine Nnfloge fiir G5robbiebz
ltohl 1lub Gtnbruh. 0tenSto9 W}tttog
herict,tete Ste Orol1h Surp folgenbe 9l1z
flooeu eill: Gsegen 5bo1nos Genrebn,
olia8 Sad Gollen, Nobert Campbell,
unb Mtlltonn Gn1ith oltoS SDb1 Gong,
ie ei1re 9(nflaoe megel1 8robbiebi itabls
uno GinbrudS. @egen 9l1ton Oean=
oerfelb 1pl1rbe eine Nnflage megen Gro6z
biebjtablS I'M L. G'rab erboben.
O}ontaonahn1tttag lpllrben Tolgencen
8iireerpapiere eepdbrt: Weor Menner
unb Mnbrem Steiner, SpringlielO; Nlz
| freD Ningnen, 9ansfo; uno am Gtc1sz
tao Yeter 9aaf
Bet Oem Yrdli1nar Nufrrlf oe5 Giptlz
&alenoerS >pe[her aus AZ Udllel1 beltano
fpuroe foloe11oe 9iapo{ttion getroffen:
ssurp s5dGe.
State of Minnesota VS.. Alex Delnken.
Albert A. Paffrath VS.. Herman F
Wenzel.
David Adler & Sons Clothing Co. VS.
Gehrke & Evans.
The Commonwealth Shoe & Leather
| CO. VS.. Gehrke & Evans.
| Carl J. Holman VS.. Thomas Peterson.
I Fred Mielke vs.. Charles Deutsch-
mann.
Casey Land Company vs.. H. c.
Schultz.
Anna sPetersun VS.. The Mystic Work
ers of the Void.
George Kraus, Jr. VS.. Joseph Kraus.
Irwin Zieske, on behalf Of Margaret
Zieske, Minor, VS.. Peter Hansen.
Edward Bloneke VS.. William Prahl.
Edward Wolf vs. Mike Ranweiler and
Kansas Casualty & Surety Co.
| Irwin Zieslxe VS.. Peter Hansen.
Nick {. Jutz VS.. Albert Guth.
H. c.. NundaI VS.. Christ M. Nundahl.
Esser Liqour Co. VS. Matt Peterson.
! Albert Gieseke VS.. Otto Triton.
Gantneraeridjt Sage Npti5.
George Guggisberg VS.. William H,
! BOettger.
Herman. Held and E. H. Haeberle VS.
E. H. Juni, ct al.
In the Matter Of the Guardianship OF
Of Margaret Rieger, minor.
Anna Zupfer VS.. London Guarantee y
| accident Company.
Jacob Klossner, .)r., ct al, VS. Amanda
! Wicherski, ct al.
In the Matter of the Guardianship Of
Anna Rosina Hoehne, Incompetent.
Frank e. Lee VS.. Frank Kretsch.
Joseph Schloegel and Anna Schloege
VS.. Wenzel Schloegel and Barbara
Schloegel.
VIM. Getting, as Executor, VS.. Johr
Vierling and Maggie Vierling.
Charles Betcher Lumber co. VS. Jacob
L. Hoy, ct al.
G,erihtsiaIc fiir bteien Sermin.
Court Cases to be tried at this Term
J. H. Addy. VS.. John A. Van Gordon.
In the Matter of the Estate Of Lee
Drusch, deceased, Johanna Kroschel, VS.
Henrietta Drusch.
/ Continental and Commercial Trust &
Savings Bank and Frank HI. Jones VS.
4 United Flour Mills Company, Roy III
Goddard and Bessie M. Goddard.
Fred Lowinske vs. Minnie Lowinske.
! Abner M. Parker and Edith A. Parke
VS. Henry Neef, ct al.
Vinzenz Zemler VS.. The City of Sleep!
Eye.
YalIirt, sdlihtuna in Qasiidt,
August A. Petrich VS.. George Foster. I.
| Edward F. Berkner VS.. Julius Krueger
Oscar Thordsen, ct al VS.. Theodore
/ Thordsen and Rena Thordsen.
Berger Lundquist VS.. Ludwig Dahl.
Associated Buyers Company VS.. Georg'
Foster, H. G.. Gehrke and E. w. Evans
@eld,lidtet.
i In the Matter of Appeal Of Franl
Schroepfer, County Ditch No. 20.
i Max Renner and William Kamolz VS.
Stanley Larson.
i Mary johnson VS.. State Bank of Sleep!
Eye. !.
/ The case of Fred Lowinske VS.. Minnie
! Lowinske was tried by the court Monday
afternoon and a decree Of divorce wa!
granted the defendant.
n ysrc1r +,r} f|N n