The daily telegram. [volume] (Clarksburg, W. Va.) 1901-1926, 1916-06-30
DELAY IS BENEFICIAL TO THE UNITED STATES
INJUNCTION ISSUED
AGAINST STRIKERS
At the Tuna Glass Plant by
Judge Maxwell of the Cir
cult Court Here.

Glass Company, some Of whose en-
ployes are on strike for rOCogni-
ton OF the United Brotherhood Of
Glass Workers. Judge Raymond
Maxwell Of the circuit court. has is
sued an injunction restraining
7. Roy Smith and others from
interfering with the operation
of the company's plant The order
OF injunction reads as follows:
This day came the plaintiff. Tuna
Glass Company, In open court at a
special term and presented Its bill of
complaint against the defendants in
this cause. to-wit: 7. Roy Smith.
Fred B. Sayre. H. C. Cassidy, W..
F. Miller. Il. Roach. o. Starkey. 5.
Sisk. l. Stevenson, ]. Henry, W.
Sponaugle. o. Cox, E. Knight. j..
Golden, X. Wolfe. S. Weaver. V. Ar
genbrlght, c. Knight, w. Myers, NJ.
Stone. o. MCtheny. +. Henderson.
w. Knight, c. c. Brown, A. Larson.
X. Collins, 1. Travis. n. VRnscoy, J..
simpkIns, II. Blackshire. II. Wot-
ring. Z. oldRker. II. Lynch. NJ. John
son. Il. Freeman. W. Weaver. C.
Netzer, H. Neff. o. KrOh. G. Kelser,
NJ. CopenhRver, X. Wiseman, G.
Ross. Il. Coberly. L. C. Teter, d. HOl-
Ter, J. F. Whitman, L. Plumm, NJ.
McCauley, H. Harden. w. Smith, w.
Stoltz, Ralph LantZ, II. Otterman,
Ivron Lantz. S. GRnda. John Lantz.
]. r. Myers, ]. McNemar. l.. HUFF
ford, X. McNemar. H. Tenny, VIII
liam Hudson, II. Steele, Fred Mills,
c. Willis. w. Smythe. j. l.. WindelI,
9. Martin, A. C. Vineyard. d. Meria.
B. B. Womble. II. Neff. G. Cole, w
Gould, F. Napleton, f. Wills. v.
Vineyard. s. Tenny. C. Cochran, 8.
Spadafore. C. Hughes, r. Fansler, A.
ListOn, H. N. Weekly. Roscoe Dyer
w. G. Plant, Louis Scott, ]. Card
mon, c. Smith, ]. Outright, Fred
Bailey, ]. NJ. Evans. Philo Marvin,
NJ. German, Payne Lee, Il. b. Week
ly, L. S. Coffman and the unknown
directors, officers. members, agents
and employees of the United Brother
hood Of Window Glass Workers.
ThereupOn SAID plaintiff moved the
court to grant an injunction in ac-
cordnnce with the prayer of said bill
and In support Of said motion asked
that said bill Of complaint read as
an affidavit and also rendered in
support OF said motion the aiIida-
Wits Of Charles H. Harding, B. o.
Buzzard. Ellis Doflamyer, A. J. Nep-
tune and Robert T. Reynolds; which
afhdavits are here now filed In this
cause.
And It appearing Co me court that
by reason Of the facts and clrcum-
stances as set out In said bill Of COM
plant and by reason Of the fact that
the defendants named In said bill
are numerous, Y was impracticable
to give notice Of said motion; and II
appearing from said bill and afFlda-
Wits that the plaintiff is entitled to
temporary injunction rs prayed In
Its said hill Of complaint: now there
fore, It is ad1udged, ordered and de-
creed that the above name defend
ants, their agents. servants, employees
and abettors be. and they are hereby
restrained and inhibited from inter
fcring with persons now employed
by the Tuna Glass Company, or with
any persons who may hereafter de-
sire TO work and labor for the Tuna
Glass Company. or with any person
who shall apply to the Tuna Glass
Company for employment. by vio-
lence, threats OF violence, challenges
to fight, abusive language, pIcketing
or placing guards in the neighbour
hood OF the Tuna Glass Company's
factory for the purpose Of lntImI-
dating any person whatsoever or by
any other means whatsoever calcu-
lated or tending to intimidats or
alarm the employees OF the Tuna
Glass Company. or persons seeking
employment from the Tuna Glass
Company; and that the said defend
ants and all other persons are hereby
enjoin and inhibited from causing
or coercing any OF the employees Of
the Tuna Glass Company to quit or
abandon their said employment and
from congreeating on or near the
premises Of the Tuna Glass Company
for the purpose OF interfering with
or intimidatIng in any way the emf
ployes Of the Tuna Glass Company or
persons seeking employment from
said company; which Injunction
shall be in effect until the further
order OF this court. II is further or
dered that service OF duly certified
copy Of this order shall be due and
sufficient notice to the defendants
and their contederates Of said In
junction.