The Wheeling intelligencer. [volume] (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1903-1961, 1916-01-10

me new law or that 10 imposed am nm
Ju~l' burdens upon anyone. Tber. ,,.s
lam a need for a revision ~ the
and II Is NV belief that ~, 10. A..
TO ninety Der c.nt ~ ~ ~
operators OF this state. OF course A.
TIn''1ms a Few things that we do not
- nu' mere never will be and never
AN ne. IN this state or in any other
state a mining law that will suit Ali
Yours very truly.
ia 'oAl. OPERATORS ASSON,
'''""'"' X i. Evans. Secretary"
Charleston. W. Va. Jan. 5. 1915.
MT Earl A. Henry. chief OF department
OF Mines Charleston. ". Va.
Nckn"wlrdgiug yours Of the sth. reIa-
Wv" TO- article 1U airmont Times Of Ian
nary 4th. charging that an. Cavern
ing 1911 through the LagfSIature ,yifb-
"uI consulting the operators.
or your Information hog to sav that
ms ls not a fact. as a great many On.
tator> AS well as myself went over ms
n.-s 'Hn discussed same with you.
~Ii~cu~~"d the bill with YOU
~ tnI"r diiiercut occasions at least
''" u"yS bei'T' same was printed.
NEW RIVER & POCAHONTAS CoNs
'sisOedj II. 81 Bertole,. Gen. supt.~
A. Boomer. W. Va. Jan. .. 1915.
~, 'iil \ Henry. chief OF department
H.. va
ln reply 10 your letter Of the sth inst
i'.Stite % an article which appeared in
a. tinl'ni paper stating that you ana
'I' Governor presented a mining mn
'"" day OF the Legislative ses-
"i..nlI giving an operator or their
ltltr~"IfatlVes an opportunity 10 see ~
pr ~. That as Ear a. Z am concerned.
0 Nu'N iIl- o. not true a. you and 1 dis
GUESSED the bill In your office and / fourd
no tauli with DO but said thai I Thought
DO was a good ban. thaf III fitteJ 1be
L' NNNN OF NLN state and HNaT.
vision lu it that 3 could See. which
"'..d WORK a hardship on any mining
90 do the right thing with th. pronertV
.I'h had 40 charge and TO their en-
lNt hlll. IN all probability.
would make some changes which wou1d
De- more severe. 1911
W nave been operating our mines In-
ger ihi~ Law and have found n b.re-
ann We have absolutely no ,iiti-
10 b. not my desire TO enter into any
newspaper controversy but I have stated
the truth and you are entitled to a..
COAL & COKE COMPANY
'9lsned) T. TO- Huddy. Surt."
hiagk Hetses W Va. Jan. 6. 1916.
MF f-urI 4. Henry.
chisf Of Department OF Mines.
charleston. ~. Va.
"a Hlr -k'plyiug 60 YOUR favor of
i.' fairmont Times stating that III.
COY nor amy yourself attempted 10 put
uiA through the legislature. revising
'-' mining Law without giving the on
'Itl'rs an opportunity TO read the pro-
hill vii say that this IL a mis-
To- M 1-on,enias 81 ne Ten Ie2s dsys prior vo5
invited mo and MI d. n. Nnsh. ntfnr-
.'! Tor th' COMPANY. % 90 over this hin
met with our approval and since 30 mas
.'' enacted into q law Dr. has proved
engaged lu the coal industry.
itfrNecffuIIf yours.
HI.NCK EETSEY COAL q MINING
'sIencd W Woodward. Gen Mgr
Your statement ma .tbe BIN was Inc
.r'du""f or fhe fref day ~ tho ierIsia-
1.-Two session. ie wholly erroneous ana
Hirh O. fIhrirHfiDu mould not bee -
''iei rom e u~~wsparer thar peculiar
If r"Hrrrents The interests 81 % great
coal corporation. For wears tho TirnSs
a haf "a r"presentative 90 each leFis-
.1t. session and % ought % be- and
other r-ewapauere
Introduction OF Bm.-
ID" I'rieltfurs convened on January
ID. I''t Tho Chronological orfsr III.
ferdIrr tr. Introduction and rasfsre ~
ths NII thrH.rh fIa legislature f0II.ws
january It i'lD IerialatuIe convened
1910. mining hIif fntro-
I'n.'. I'I reported back with
.. gmmitt"d 70 commit
"a .tr. .. IH1r. reported fatnrabIv
.'rf ItI.. 'u motion GREGORY
read Hr.f rme
'n motion hs Ne-rum made special
0f.'r .Hf February 1905.
Iti' road second time
tNo .'rrisl ono two
,ir... .r. CARRIED lu1 ono I.ef ono
r.1 Nu. b.. ke.u I..f Tva Es ore
.-. ..".. .."".." -... -". .