Honolulu star-bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1912-2010, 1916-12-05
BY AUTHORITY
NOTICE
PUBLIC HEARING. DECEMBER 5
1916 ~~~:..


PROVEMENT OF SMITH STREET
BETWEEN QUEEN AND BERE-
TANIA STREETS, IN HONOLULU,
TERRITORY OF HAWAII.
TO THE OWNERS, LESSEES, AND
OCCUPANTS OF LANDS ABUT-
TING on SAID STREET PRO-
POSED To BE ASSESSED FOR
THE IMPROVEMENT OF SAID
STREET. AND To ALL PERSONS
INTERESTED GENERALLY. VI
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that
in accordance with Resolution No. 632,
the Board OF Supervisors of the City
and County of Honolulu propose to
modify the plan TO improve Smith
street, in the District of Honolulu
aforesaid, upon frontage basis. s
|. CHARACTER OF IMPROVE.
MENT AND MATERIALS II
% Grading. 49,.
(2D Setting lava rock curbing.
90 Constructing concrete cutters
80 inches wide. :.- 49,. ..~... =. F..
1D Paving the entire improvement
with Pinch "Bitulithic" surfacing on
concrete base inches in thick
ness. y. - =.
II. FRONTAGE TO BE ASSESSED
Sub District "A" :=". Z l..
The entire frontage, both sides in
cluded, abutting upon Smith street
and between the mauka property line
of Queen street and the makai prop
erty line Of Beretania street, exclud-
ing the frontage of the Dowsett Com
pany, Limited, constitutes Sub-District
"A" and is divided into zones for
assessment on graduated basis per
front foot for the cost Of acquiring
new land, as follows: - il. /, j.
Zone | is made up Of that frontage
in Sub-District "a" lying between
Queen street and the points on the
property lines midway between King
and Hotel streets. =.
Zone u is made up of that frontage
in Sub-District "A" between the nor
therly boundary of Zone and the
points in the property lines midway
between Hotel and Pauahi streets.
Zone 10 is made Up of that frontage
constituting the balance of Sub.
District "A" ~
Sub District 80" - 49,.
The entire frontage, both sides in
cluded, abutting upon Smith street be-
tween the mauSa property line Of.
Queen street and the makai property
line Of Beretania street, constitutes
Sub-District 3D. to be further as
sessed on a uniform basis per front
foot for the general improvement, ex-
GLIDING the cost of acquiring new land,
and for new curling where necessary.
III. ASSESSMENTS PROPOSED
Sub-District ZAP
The proportion of cost Of acquiring
new land for load extension to be.
borne by abuti:ng property shall be
paid by assessments against the front
age in Sub District "a as follows: I.
Zone |. The frontage in Zone 1, sub
jeet to assessment (being 1Q47.39 feet
shall be assessed at the maximum rate
Of $6.527S6 per 'front.' foat:
Zone u. The frontage in Zone IL,
subject to assessment (being 629.30
ft.) shall be assessed, at the maximum
rate Of $5.12776 per front foot.
Zone III. The frontage in Zone III,
subject to assessment (being 106475
feet) shall be assessed at the maxi
mum rate of S303066 per front foot.
Sub-District rB"
The cost of the general improve
ment, excluding the cost Of acquiring
new land. and the cost of new curbing,
shall be paid by an additional assess
ment against the frontage, both sides
included, in Sub-Districts "B" (being
2S53.0 feet) at the maximum rate OF
$8.44 per from. foot. -
The cost of new curling shall be
paid by further assessment at the
maximum rate CT s0.45 per front foot
against AUDITING lands in front of
which the same shall beslaid. " 4
". NEW LAND TO BE ACQUIRED.
New land to be acquired shall be
the same as heretofore advertised.
V. ESTIMATE OF COST. :.
Cd The maximum estimate 4
of the entire cost of the i'm. ..-
provement, including engi- -. ~
neering and incidentals. $44, $3.50
(2) The maximum estimate "A
for new curbing ......... $4,000
(3) The maximum estimate
of general improvement,
excluding cost of acquiring ~.
new land ............... 24,O53.35
(4) The maximum rate to
be assessed per front foot
for general improvement, .s..
excluding cost of new land ...s |
is 8.44
90 The maximum rate for ..-
new curbing per front foot
is -. $500. III. VIZ
COST FOR ROAD EXTENSION.
100 Cost of acquiring new -.:...>
land :. 1s,s35.75
20 Proportion of cost to be = F.. 49,.
borne by City and County,
80 49, .................. 6,645.25
.(S) Proportion of cost to be >
assessed against abutting
property in Sub-District .......-:-
"a" ............... 13,290.50
Zone /.
1(9) Rate Of assessment per III ~.
front foot in Zone |, for
road extension .......... 6.52736
sZone u.
~f1nN