The Birmingham age-herald., 1916-02-13
COURT OF APPEALS CASES
 SENT TO SUPREME BODY

Montgomery, February 12-(Specia1. )
 One hundred and five cases which were pending in the court of appeals of
 Alabama for decision were yesterday
 transferred to the supreme court This was done under the arrangement be- tween the two higher courts of the
 state whereby the supreme court re-
 ceives and decides 60 per cent and the
 court of appeals 40 per cent of all
 cases submitted in the two courts. With
 the call of the second division the past
 week each of the eight judicial divi-
 sions of the state had received its first
 call of cases on the docket. When
 Chief Justice Anderson of the supreme
 court and Presiding Judge Pelham Of
 the court of appeals met yesterday to
 make the semi-annual division of cases
 1t was found that there had been sub
 mitted in the supreme court during the first call of the November term, 1915, 253 cases and in the court of appeals 344 cases. To reduce the number of cases in the court of appeals to 40 per cent of the total submissions 105 cases were thereupon ordered transferred from that court to the supreme court. The following is a list of the cases so | transferred
 First Division-163, P. l.. Mcleod vs
 NJ S. Garrick; 172, Southern Dredging company vs. S. L. Christie; 174, Peo- pies Shoe company vs. John Skally; TIT, Capital Security company vs. George F. owen; 179, Paul B. Ray vs. Thomas Grammar; 1S2. Page & Jones vs. E. T. Barry; 195, Holt Lumber com-
 pany vs. Mrs. I. M, Givens; 196, Rob ert J. Kearns vs. Mobile Light and Railroad company.
 Second Division-1O5, D. J. Meador & Son vs. Standard Oil company. Third Division-204, Western Rail- | way of Alabama vs Tom Mays; PA, Cole Motor Car company vs. P. D. Te- bault 2S5, Lee Holmes vs. B. K. Bloch, doing business, etc; 236, G. F. Finer ! son vs. Central of Georgia Railway | company.
 Fourth Division-25S, J. L. Kelley vs. | J. R. Graves; 260. J. T. Beasley, ct al. vs Burroughs & Taylor Co.,; 355, P. F. l Greer vs. Malone Beall company; 399, | Georgia Cotton company vs. R. M. Lee; | 407, Louisville and Nashville railroad company vs Riley Short; 40S, R. E.. | Dominey vs. Bowling Martin Grocery | company; All, Brown & Flowers vs. Central of Georgia Railway company;
 412, city of Dothan vs. S. Horseman; i 414 Benson Hardware company vs. 1 Wilder Mercantile company; 416, J. c.
 
 1 on, claimant; 426, Terminal Oil com pany vs. Planters Warehouse and Gin 1 company; 439, Central of Georgia Rail- l vrNy company vs. Ella Mathis; 442, Houston National bank of Dothan vs. I J. T. Edmondson & Go.
 1 Fifth Divison-1S7, c. l.. Porter ct al.
 vs. T. H Watkins; 190, Western Union | Telegraph company vs. J. P. Hawkins. l Sixth Division-669. W. M. Knight vs. l Rebecca Garden, adminstratrix; TOP, Western Union Telegraph company vs. George Hicks; 766, Western Union Tele- graph company vs O. T. Miller; sos, Will Brown vs. City of Tuscaloosa: S11, Wads- I worth Red Ash Coal company vs. An l drew Scott; S39 Louisville and Nashville Railroad company vs. J. C. Jenkins; S67, Berthold & Jennings Lumber company vs. George W. Phalin Lumber company; 9o1, ] United States Health and Accident In- surance company vs. Logwood U. Coin; 904 National Baking and Lunch company vs. VIII Wilson: 905, Birmingham Rail- way, Light and Power company vs Will liam Garrett; sos, Western Union Tele-