Honolulu star-bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1912-2010, 1916-11-13
BY AUTHORITY

.... 1915 49,.
PROPOSED. MODIFICATION OF M
PR0yFMEN1' OF. SMITH STREET
BETWEEN QUEEN AND BERE-
TANIA STREETS. IN HONOLULU,
TERRITORY OF HAWAII
TO THE OWNERS, I-ESSEES, AND
OCCUPANTS OF LANDS ABUT-
TING OK SAID STREET PRO
POSED TO BE ASSESSED FOR
THE. IMPROVEMENT OF SAID
STREET. AND To ALL PERSONS
INTERESTED GENERALLY.
NOTICE is HEREBY GIVEN that
In accordance with Resolution No 632,
the Board of Supervisors of the City
and County of Honolulu propose to
modify the plan to improve Smith.
street, in the District OF Honolulu
aforesaid. upon frontage basis.
T. CHARACTER OF IMPROVE
MENT AND MATERIALS
IN GRADING ......s.
10 Setting lava rock clUbing
80 Constructing concrete cutters
80 inches wide
t4) Paving the entire Improvement
with a Pinch .Btulfthic' surfacing on
a concrete base inches in thick
ness "...".-. nh
II. !. FRONTAGE To BE ASSESSED
Sub-Distriet a.
The entire frontage, both sides in
cluded. abutting upon Smith street
and between the mauka property line
of Queen street and tie makai prop
erty line of Beretania street, eXclud-
ing the frontage of the Dowsett Com
pany, Limited. constitutes Sub-District
A. and is divided into zones for
assessment on 2 graduated basis per
front foot for the cost OF acquiring
new land. as follows: i.
Zone | is made up of that frontage
in Sub-District "A" lying between
Queen street and the points on the
property lines midway between King
and Hotel streets.
Zone u is made up of that frontage
in Sub-District "A" between the nor
therly boundary of Zone and the
points in the property lines midway
between Hotel and Pauahi streets.
Zone ~ is made Up of that frontage
constituting the balance of Sub
District A f.
Sub District "B"
The entire frontage. both sides in
cluded, abutting upon Smith street be-
tween the mauSa property line of
Queen street and the makai property
line of Beretania street, constitutes
Sub-District "B, to be further as
sessed on uniform basis per front
foot for the general Improvement, ex
GLIDING the cost of acquiring new land
and for new curbing where necessary.
III. ASSESSMENTS PROPOSED
Sub-District "a"
The proportion of cost of acquiring
new land for load extension to be
borne by abutt:ng property shall be
paid by assessments against the front
age in Sub-District "A" as follows:
Zone |. The frontage in Zone !, sub
ject to assessment (being 1047.39 feet
shall be assessed at the maximum rate
of $6.5273G per front foot.
Zone II. The frontage in Zone ii,
subject to assessment (being $3.50
ft) shall be assessed at the maximum
rate of $5.12776 per front foot
Zone lll. The frontage in Zone III, |
subject to assessment (being 1064.75 |
feetl shall be assessed at the maxi !
mum rate of s3.03066 per front foot.
Sub-District go"
The cost Of the general improve
ment. excluding the cost of acquiring |
new land and the cost Of new curbing, |
shall be paid bv an additional assess |
ment against the frontage, both sides
included, in Sub-District b. (being |
2S53.0 feetl at the maximum rate of |
1914 per front foot.
The cost of new clirbing shall be |
paid by further assessment at the /
maximum rate CT $0.45 per front foot
against abuttiug lands in front of |
which the same shall be laid.
". NEW LAND TO BE ACQUIRED.
New land to be acquired shall be
The same as heretofore advertised.
Y. ESTIMATE OF COST.
ID The maximum estimate
of the entire cost of the inn
provement, including engi-
neering and incidentals. .$44 $3.50 |
~ The maximum estimate
for new curbing ..,..... $4,000
60 The maximum estimate
of general improvement,
excluding cost of acquiring
new land :. ............. 24,G53.S5
"a The maximum rate to
be assessed per front foot
for general improvement,
excluding cost of new land
is ..........,.... S.44
co The maximum rate for
new curbing per front foot
is ......,...,...... .........-.. 0.45
COST FOR ROAD EXTENSION.
(6) Cost of acquiring new
land 80. -. 19,935.75
90 Proportion of cost to be
borne by City and County,