Honolulu star-bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1912-2010, 1916-06-06

/ +.
i FROM McCULLY STREET TIC
| AND INCLUDING THE STREET
i INTERSEC TIoN OF KING
STREET AND BERETANIA
| STREET, AT MOILIILI ROAD, In
HONOLULU, T. H.
TO THE OWNERS. LE5SEES AND
OCCUPANTS or LANDS Adult
| TING ON SAID PORTION OF
1 KING STREET, PROPOSED 70
BE ASSESSED FOR THE IN
PROVEMENT OF SAID STREET,
| AND TO ALL PERSONS INTER.
! ESTED GENERALLY:
NOTICE Is HEREBY GIVEN that
the Board of Supervisors Of the City
and County of Honolulu, in accord.
ance with Resolutions Nos. 349, 3S3.
3S4, motion of February 3, 1916, and
Resolution No. 524, propose to i'm.
prove that portion Of King Street
from McCully Street to and including
the street intersection Of King Street
and Beretania Street at Moiliili Road.
in the District Of Honolulu aforesaid,
upon frontage basis.
i.
FRONTAGE TO BE ASSESSED.
The frontage to be assessed con-
| sists of the mauka or northeasterly
property lire and the makai or south
westerly property line abutting upon
said King Street Extension and upon
the street intersection OF King and
Beretania Streets within the end
limits aforesaid, as more particularly
set forth in the Engineers report,
dated June 1, relating to said inn
proyements and hereinafter referred
to and incorporated by reference.
* III. s
MAIN THOROUGHFARE: CoNTRI-
BUTTON TO COST BY CITY
AND COUNTY.
Since by Resolution No. 34s, as
amended by 1888, said portion of King
Street was declared a main or gen
eral thoroughfare, the City. and ,Coun-
ty Of Honolulu propose 10 assume
and pay out of General Revenue
33 1870 of the cost of improvement.
III.
CHARACTER OF IMPROVEMENT
AND MATERIAL.
(a) The grading, surfacing and
paving with bitulithic on crushed
rock base of King Street Extension.
(b) The eurbing with lava rock
of all uncurbed property and the NOV
ing and resetting of present curbing
where necessary.
IS (c) The installation of storm
drains OF concrete where necessary.
w.
ASSESSMENTS PROPOSED.
Cd The cost OF the entire inn
provement, less the proportion to be
borne by the City and County, and
also less the cost of new curbing,
shall be paid by general assessment
at the maximum rates of $S.32063 per.
front foot against all lard abutting
upon said portion of said street, as
described, both sides included. The
total frontage (including 1920 feet,
frontage opposite cross streets and
City and County property is $40
feet
(2) The cost OF new curbing shall
be paid by assessment at the maxi
mum rate of $0.45 per front foot
against the abutting lands in front
of which the same shall be laid, there
being approximately $500 feet:
".
ESTIMATE OF COST.
ID The maximum estimate
of the entire cost of the
Improvement. in luding
Engineering and Incl
dentals, is maximum. So, 233 80
Of new curbing .......s. 2,s5o.5o'
(31 33 1870 of cost or Con-
tribution of City and Counr
ty to Main Thoroughfare. l0,194.3O1
(4) Maximum estimate Of
cost of the general i'm
provement to be assessed
on a frontage basis after
deducting items specifi-
cally borne is............ 2O.sss.7OI
60 Total frontage subject to
assessment for the gen.
eral Improvement .....s. 40 It
CO. Maximum rate to be as
sessed per front foot for
the general Improvement,
exclusive of cost of new
curbs .......s S.S2O6s
ca Total frontage subject
to assessment for the CON-.
struction of new curbing $3.50 IT..
go Maximum rate to be- as
sessed per front foot for
the cost of new curbing
when necessary ......$ O.45
All of which appears in more de-
tail in the Engineers Report, herein
after referred to and herein incor-
porated by reference.
VI.
FURTHER DETAILS.
The map and general plans, and
other data so prepared by the Engi-
neer. in his modified report dated
June L, 1916, and adopted by the
Board, with respect to the proposed
improvement incorporated herein by
reference), may be seen and examin-
ed by any person interested, at the
office of the City and County Engi-
neer and of the City and County Clerk