The Mankato free press. [volume] (Mankato, Blue Earth County, Minn.) 1879-1924, 1916-06-02
CALL ON TUESDAY MORN
UsualAm0unt of disadvantages
Will Be Heard BY Judge
C0mStOck
rom Wednesdays Daily.

! dar will commence at ten O'Clock
| Tueday morning. The grand jury
will probably be charged at two in the
1 afternoon, and then will be the pre-
emptory call of the calendar
The petit jurors Will report for
duty on Monday afternoon, June IL,
at two O'Clock.
The civil calendar is as follows:
Carl J. Holman VS.. John Dagan,
Mrs. John Dagan and Emma McGin-
mis-.
| l.. H. Moses VS.. Chicago, st. Paul
| Minneapolis and Omaha Railway
company.
| ]. L. Macbeth VS.. John Dagan, Mrs.
John Dagan and Emma McGinnis.
| Elizabeth Warren VS.. A. T. Rogers.
August F. Blume VS.. Chicago, Mil
waukee and ST. Paul Railway COM
pany, ct al
Me Juiiar VS.. Louis Herzberg.
Viola Stoddard VS.. Wallace Stod-
dard.
The Mankato State Bank of Man.
kato, a corporation VS.. George Kim
| BILE and Alice M. Kimble.
Thoe. Thomson VS.. Martin Wilt
gen.
]. NJ. Wane VS.. Cedar Rapids Oil
company.
Charles Seppman and Fred Stro-
bel, co-partners as Seppman Well
company VS.. Joseph w. Warner and
Della Warner.
Lester E. Fleming VS.. David c.
Crawford, eft al.
John P. Galbraith, as trustee of
the Carpio Hdwe. and Impl company
VS.. Louis Herzberg.
Albert Schwake and Albert Kramer
vs. F. T. Miller
Ruth Lang VS.. Joseph H. Lang and
Anton Lang.
George Atchison VS.. William J.
Morehart, Malcolm Morehart and
Roger Merchant.
Lorenz l.. Mayer VS.. Mayer Broth
ers company, a corporation.
]. n. Compton VS.. Emerson John
ston.
Dena J. Fitch, by ELLEN Z. Fitch,
guardian ad Item. VS.. George Curran.
Walter J. Laird VS.. Joe Wishnick,
doing business under the firm name
and style Of Mankato Scrap Iron and
Metal company.
In the Matter of Judicial Ditch No.
seven, Blue Earth county, Minnesota,
demand for jury trial, of Kathrine
Owens.
James C. Campbell VS.. Frances R.
Campbell
James N. Mccarthy VS.. F. Desor-
mOux and Joseph Nero, to-partners
and doing business under the firm
name and style of F. Desormoux Con-
struction company.
National Citizens Bank of Mankato,
Mimi, VS.. John F. Dackins and Jen-
ME M Scherer. .-
Amiel Nienow VS. village of Maple
ton.
J. B. Johnston, as administrator Of
the estate of Oliver r. Mather, de-
ceased, VS.. John H. Macbeth and
Frank j. Haas.
Jesse L. Storrs VS.. A. NJ Brush,
ct al.
William faster VS. Gust Jahnz.
F. w. Dietz VS.. Daniel L. Williams .
Marie E. Ham VS.. C. L. Oleson.
John B. Richards and David Rich
ards VS.. Mankato Expert School of
Business and Paul Skarstad, doing
business under the hrm name and
designation of University of Southern
Minnesota and Mankato Expert
School of Business.
II. Warner Baker VS.. James r.
Marvin, ct al
F. B. Clements, doing business un-
der the firm name of Clements Auto
ern Railway company.
,,1t
of the estate of George Lulick, de-
ceased VS., Chicago, Milwaukee and
st. Paul Railway company, a corpora
ton, louis Nelson and E. r, Terry
Susanna C. Ruehs VS.. Charles F.
Ruehs.
A. Klages VS.. J. H. Williams.
William Albrecht VS.. John F. Al
brecht and Rudolph Albrecht.
r. c.. Turner VS.. The Western
Union Telegraph company, incor-
porated.
Henry Heidwinkel VS.. Chicago and
Northwestern Railway company
Albert Hagermann VS.. L. A. Will
fert.
Hugh Jones VS.. John Torkelson,
ct al.
Henry Oberlander VS.. Free Press
Printing company
d. M. Gilmore company vs. William
A. Hanna, ct al
t D M. Gilmore company VS. George
w. Cramcr, ct al.
D. M. Gilmore company VS.. w. NJ.
Ballard, ct al
Hazel Dawson vs. Herbert Dawson.
Pearl ShWbar VS.. John P. Shurber.
Clara jeanette Meyer VS.. Alpheus
A. Meyer.
Henry II. Camp VS.. Alva A. Lin
dahl.
Louella Mahoe VS.. Hugh S Mabee.
Lorenz Mayer VS.. Mayer Brothers
company, a corporation.
Otto Lamm and Carrie Hohmann
VS.. Even Olson and Anna Olson.
Anton Deglinann and Louisa Degl-
mann VS.. National Citizens Bank of
Mankato, Minnesota, corporation.
Christian Scott VS.. Earl oliver.
Carl Oestreich VS.. Chicago, st,