Honolulu star-bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1912-2010, 1916-11-10

f.. +. ..~-.. 1916 ..@.s.a
/ PROPOSED. NOTIFICATION. OF I'M
T. PRONEMENT,. OF SMITH STREET
/ BETWEEN QUEEN AND BERE-
! TANiA STREETS. IN HONOLULU,
| TERRITORY OF HAWAII. "
TO THE OWNERS, LESSEES.: AND.
| OCCUPANTS OF. LANDS. = ABIrT-
! TING ON. SAID STREET PRO.
! POSED TO BE ASSESSED FOR
! THE IMPROVEMENT OF SAID
| STREET. AND TO ALL PERSONS
INTERESTED GENERALLY.
NOTICE is HEREBY GIVEN that
in accordance with Resolution No. e&2,
the Board Of Supervisors Of the City
and County Of Honolulu propose to.
modify the plan Ia improve Smith
street in the District OF Honolulu
aforesaid. upon frontage. basis.
f.. " CHARACTER OF IMPROVE
-. MENT AND MATERIALS
% Grading. ..:..- --.,@
81 Setting lava rock curbing
~ Constructing concrete cutters
80 inches wide ..-
q! Paving the entire Improvement
with Finch "Eitulithic" syirfacing on
a concrete. base inches in thick
ness. r. ~ -
n. FRONTAGE Tt. BE ASSESSED
i" sub-cistrict "a.
The entire frontage, both sides in
cluded. abutting upon Smith street
and between the mauka property line
of Queen street and the makai prog-
crty line Of Berotania street, eXclud-
ing the frontage Of the B6wsett Gem
pany, Limited. constitutes Snb=District
a. and is divided into zones for
assessment on graduated basis per
front foot for the cost OF acquiring
new land. as follows: NJ
Zone ! is male up Of that frontage
in Sub-District "A" lying between
Queen street and the points on the |
property lines midway between King |
and Hotel streets. ..:...:
Zone u is made up of that frontage !
in SubDistrict a" between the nor
;therly Doundarr of Zone ] and the |
points in the property lines midway |
between Hotel and Pauahi streets.
Zone ~ is made UP of that frontage |
constituting the balance of Sub
District "A" 49,
Sub District %"
The entire frontage. both sides in
cluded, abutting upon Smith street be
tween the mauia property line of
Queen street and the makai property |
line of Beretalia street, constitutes
Sub-DiStrict "B, to be further as
sessed on a uniform basis per front
foot for the general improvement, eX-
GLIDING the cost of acquiring new land,
III. ASSESSMENTS PROPOSED
Sub-District a."
The proportion Of cost of acquiring
new land for load extension to be
borne by abutt:ng property shall be
paid by assessments against the front
age in Sub-District A as follows:
Zone I. The frontage in Zone l, sub
ject to assessment (being 1047.39 feet !
shall be assessed at the maximum rate
of $6.52736 per front foot.
Zone II. The frontage in Zone II,
subject to assessment (being $3.50
ft.) shall be assessed at the maximum
rate of $5.12776 per front foot.
Zone III. The frontage in Zone III,
subject to assessment (being 1064.75i
feet) shall be assessed at the maxi
mum rate of $3.03066 per front foot
Sub-District "B"
The cost of the general improve
ment, excluding the cost of acquiring
new land and the cost of new curbing,
shall be paid by an additional assess
nent against the frontage, both sides
included, in Sub-District "B" (being
,S53.0 feet) at the maximum rate of
1914 per from. foot.
The cost of new curbing shall be
)aid by further assessment at the
maximum rate Ct $0.45 per front foot
against abuttiug lands in front of
vhichtthe same shall be laid,
v. NEW LAND TO BE ACQUIRED.
New land to be acquired shall be
he same as heretofore advertised.
V. ESTIMATE OF COST.
u The maximum estimate
of the entire cost of the i'm
provement, including engi- ~
neering and incidentals. S44, 538.10
y The maximum estimate
for new curling $4,000 !
81 The maximum estimate
of general Improvement, .
excluding cost of acquiring
new land :. =. .. 24,O53.35
A The maximum rate to
be assessed per front foot
for general improvement,
excluding cost of new land
Is ,.r-...... -. 49,. .-...: o.a4.
81 The maximum rate for
new curbing per front foot {
is .....>. 045 Il
. COST FOR ROAD EXTENSION.
s. Cost of acquiring new
land :. ......s.... 19,93575
u Proportion of cost to be
borne by City and County,
So 1-3Go. .............,.....-... 6,645.25 :