The Twin City star. [volume] (Minneapolis, Minn.) 1910-19??, 1916-02-12

possibilities, and yet only a small frac-
tion Of this land is rated as improved
land According to the census Of 1910,
there were in the south 500, IA colored
farmers C2a7 per cent Of the total
number Of farmers) working 42,6O9,-
1T acres az per cent of the total farm
acreage), Of which H,735,74S acres
Tor 1874 per cent? were reported az i'm
proved land.
Colored farmers control nearly q BILL
hon dollars worth of land and build
ings in the south, and still they control
only one-eighth Of the land and build
ings on all the farms in the south.
Tho value of the land and buildings
under the control of all the colorei
farmers was given at $500, 1872, 1874
(122 per cent Of the total value Of
land and buildings for all farms In the
south) as against $3.50, 2sO,963 Q1.8 per
cent? for 1900.
That the Negro farmer is going for
ward by leaps and bounds in the pos
session and control Of property. how
ever, II clearly shown by the census
figures Of 1900 and 1910. Even where
the Negro has many disadvantages to
face he Is making progress.
The 218467 colored farm owners in
1910 held land and buildings valued at
SIT, 1902 23S (4.8 per cent? as against
SOC, 819, 1913 (3.7 per cent? in 1900. The
owners were distributed as follows:
South Atlantic states, 101,961; east
south central, 6s,737: west south en-
tzll. 57,789.
As long As the colored tenant farm
ers, however, Outnumber the col0red
farm owners three to one and as long
% the tenant farmers have under their
control proportional amount Of land
and buildings which they may use
wisely and well or. utterly abuse
through sheer ignorance the tenant
problem and, indeed, the whole land
problem for the white south WIN be
pressing and serious one.
The 670,474 colored tenant farmers
In 1910 titled 28,587 ,802 acres, Of which
20,O98,S75 were reported as improved
Land. These tenants were using land
and buildings valued at $618, 768,147
Ga per cent? as against 1898, $3.50
D.2 per cent? in 1900 These colored
tenants were distributed as follows:
South Atlantic states. 253, 1871; east
south central. 288,232; west south cen
t1al, 151, OH.
II the Negro tenant Is not taught
how to treat the land properly and in
crease his earning power the whole
south win suffer tremendous econOm-
ic LOSS. When more than 70 per cent
Of the Negro farmers are tenants there
b important work still to be done
along agricultural lines through the
public schools. the private institutions,
the state departments Of agriculture
and the press to help the tenants raise
themselves into the class Of owners.
This improvement for many. many
white farmers has slready come about.
II the south is to make the progress
4 should there are still too many
white tenants as compared with white
farm owners.
One Of the most hopeful signs Of
progress, however, Is the percentile in
crease in Negro farmers, the amount
Of improved land held by them and the
value Of land and buildings they con-
troll In the south, according TO the
census Of 1910. 24.5 per cent Of the
eolored farmers were owners, Oh per
cent managers and 1873 per cent ten
ants. For 1900 the figures were 25.2,
OF and 74.8 respectively. In 1910 the
white farmers of the south were dis
tributed as follows: Owners, col per
cent; managers. OF; tenants, 1872. For
1900 the figures were So per cent, 90
and 88.1 respectively.
The total number of Negro farm 0p-
orators In the south in 1910 was $780,
837, and in 1900 1t was 732,862. From
1900 to 1910 the percentages Of in
crease in the south were: Total white
farmers, ia; colored farmers, 20.2;
white farm owners. II; colored, IT;
white tenants, 27.6; colored, 21.4; I'M
proved land in farms. white, 1915; COL
ored, 1915; improved land in farms
owned by white farmers. 1873; colored,
%; improved land in farms Of white
tenants. 34.8; colored, 17.8.
In Virginia. according to the census
of 1910, there were 134.155 native
white farmers who had 17,257, 410
acres of land in farms and 4S,114 Ne
groes and other nonwhite farmers who
had 2,238, 200 acres Of land In farms.
There were 1O1, 436 GAG per cent?
farms operated by white owners and
2,22S (67 per cent? farms operated by
colored owners. The value of land and
buildings of all the white farmers was
$3.50, 1913, 55S and that of all the colored
farmers $45,224,5O4. The white farm
owners had land and buildings valued
at 1914, 781, 761 and the colored farm
owners $28.O59,534 The value Of do
nestle animals was: White. $e3.941.-
80; colored, $9.251 ,533.