Honolulu star-bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1912-2010, 1916-11-21
sY AUTHORITY
NOTICE
PUBLIC HEARING. DECEMBER
1915 -. -.

PUBLIC HEARING. DECEMBER >,
1915 -. ...:....
PROPOSED MODIFICATION. OF. M
PRoyEMENT OF SMITH STREET
BETWEEN QUEEN AND BERE-
TANIA STREETS, IN HONOLULU.
TERRITORY OF HAWAII. - ~.
To THE OWNERS. LESSEES, AND
OCCUPANTS OF LANDS ABUT-
TING ON SAID STREET PRO.
POSED TO BE ASSESSED FOR
THE IMPROVEMENT OF SAID
STREET. AND TO ALL PERSONS
| INTERESTED GENERALLY. r.. .
NOTICE Is HEREBY GIVEN that
! in accordance with Resolution No. 622,
| the Board OF Supervisors Of the City
and County Of Honolulu propose to
modify the plan To improve Smith
street, in the District OF Honolulu
aforesaid upon frontage basis. - +
II. CHARACTER OF IMPROVE
MENT AND MATERIALS =s5
G1 Grading ~.~. l.. H.. f..
l2) Setting lava rock curbing.
$50 Constructing concrete cutters
! 80 inches wide r.. .".... 49,. -.
| ca Paving the entire improvement
| with a Pinch "Bitulithfc" surfacing on
concrete base inches in thick
ness. .....~ ..-:.. -
H. FRONTAGE TO BE ASSESSED
Sub-District "A" =.
The entire frontage, both sides in
cluded. abutting upon Smith street
and between the mauka property line
| Of Queen street and tie makai prop
erty line of Beretania street, exclud-
| ing the frontage of the Dowsett Com
pany, Limited, constitutes Sub-District
"A, and is divided into zones for
assessment on graduated basis per
| front foot for the cost of acquiring
new land, as follows: -: I'll
Zone is made up OF that frontage
| in Sub-District "a" lying between
Queen street and the points on the
property lines midway between King
and Hotel streets. ..... i: ..... +.
Zone II is made up of that frontage
in Sub-District "A" between the nor
therly boundary of Zone ! and the
points in the property lines midway
between Hotel and Pauahi streets.
Zone III is made Gp of that frontage
constituting the balance of Sub
District "a" .".. III.
Sub District 20" -:<.:> -:
The entire frontage, both sides IN
cluded, abutting upon Smith street be-
tween the mauka property line Of
Queen street and the makai property
line of Beretania street, constitutes
Sub-District b. to be further as
sessed on a uniform basis per front
foot for the general improvement, ex-
Guiding the cost of acquiring new land,
and for new curbing where necessary.
III. ASSESSMENTS PROPOSED
Sub District "a"
The proportion of cost of acquiring
new land for load extension to be
borne by abut;:ng property shall be
paid by assessments against the front
age in Sub-District "A" as follows:
Zone /. The frontage in Zone /, sub
jeet to assessment (being 104739 feet)
shall be assessed at the maximum rate
of $6.52736 per front foot.
Zone u. The frontage in Zone II ),
subject to assessment (being 5000
ft.) shall be assessed at the maximum
rate of $5.12776 per front foot.
Zone 90. The frontage in Zone III,
subject to assessment (being 106475l
feet shall be assessed at the maxi
mum rate of $3.03066Sper front foot
Sub-Distriet "B"
The cost of the general improve
ment, excluding the cost of acquiring
new land and the cost Of new curbing,
shall be paid bv an additional assess
ment against the frontage, both sides
included, in Sub-District "B" (being
2S53.0 feet) at the maximum rate of
$8.44 per front foot,
The cost of new curbing shall be
paid by further assessment at the
maximum rate ef $0.45 per front foot
against abuttiug lands in front of
which the same shall be laid.
". NEW LAND TO BE ACQUIRED.
New land to be acquired shall be
the same as heretofore advertised.
V. ESTIMATE OF COST.
% The maximum estimate
of the entire cost of the i'm -: -
provement, including ensi-
neering and incidentals. :. $44, 53S. 10
(2C The maximum estimate .s
for new curbing ......... $4,000
CD The maximum estimate
OF general improvement, :.
excluding cost of acquiring ...s
new land .............. 24,O53.35
"a The maximum rate to w..
be assessed per front foot
for general improvement,
excluding cost of new land
is S.44
(5) The maximum rate for ~
new curbing per front foot -
is ... O.45
COST FOR ROAD EXTENSION.
Co Cost of acquiring new IT,. ~..-~
land .................... 19,935.75
CD Proportion of cost to be II: +
borne by City and County, s.