The Ward County independent. [volume] (Minot, Ward County, N.D.) 1902-1965, 1916-12-07
new POLICY NEEDED
IN GOV Err n N lent
RAILWAY CONTROL
AeIptu|ness electromagnetic
Urged by Alfred P. Thorn.
CREDIT MUST Be IMPROVED

Increase Of Transportation Facilities
Necessary to Secure Relief From
High Cost Of Living May Thus 30
Provided For by the Railroads.
Washington, Nov. 2S.-A new policy
OF government railroad regulation,
based on constructive principles OF
helpfulness and encouragement instead
Of upon principles Of repression and
punishment, was urged by Alfred p.
Thorn, counsel for the Railway Execu-
tives' Advisory Committee, the first
witness on behalf of the railroads be-
fore the Newlands Joint Committee on
Interstate Commerce, which has insti-
tuted general inquiry into the prob.
lens of railroad regulation
1T Is proposed by the joint resolu-
ton Of Congress-" said Mr.. Thorn, Ito
go into q. comprehensive study Of the
Whole subject of transportation, to
make new assessment, after % years
of experiment, Of its history, its pres.
ent conditions and its future needs.
ulation is a permanent and enduring
part Of government in America and
that the first duty of the carriers is to
the public. That duty is to afford
reasonable facilities on reasonable
terms and at reasonable rates, and this
must be done before any private inter
ests can be considered"
Certainty, Safety and Suffieieney.
Mr.. Thorn contended that the real in
terest Of the public is in being assured
Of certainty. safety and suficiency of
transporta ton facilities. rather than in
rates. The first consideration Of the
public is to obtain transporta ton facih-
ties. What the cost is. Is in reality
second consideration, he said.
MIR. Thorn proposed an increase Of
transportation facilities as a method
of securing relief from the high cost
of living. There have been less than
LOCO miles Of new railroad construct
ed in the United States during the past
year. he said, less than In any year
since 1s4S, except the period Of the
Civil War. and yet the cost Of living is
daily advancing owing to a shortage Of
supplies which might be remedied by
securing access to new areas Of pro-
duction
Credit Must Be improved.
This leads to the consideration as to
whether railroad credit is as good az
the public interest requires. 1t is In
possible for railroads TO earn enough
to supply the necessary new facilities
from current revenue. They mus be
provided from credit Investors can
not be coerced. but must be attracted"
Among the conditions affecting rail-
road credit which deter investors he
mentioned the following:
First, Railroad revenues are not
controlled by investors. but are fixed
and limited By governmental authority
and not by one but by seversl govern
mental authorities, which do not recog-
nize responsibility for assured results
to investors and are UncGordinated
Second, Railroads cannot control
and the government cannot and does
not limit the expense account
Third. The present system OF regu-
lation Is based on a policy Of regulation
and correction and not On policy Of
helpfulness and announcement
Fourth. The outstanding obligations
Of the railroads have already exceeded
the financial rule OF safety and involve
disproDortionate amount Of obliga-
tons bearing fixed charges.
Fifth. The investor must accept q
subordinate obligation or security with
no assurance of a surplus OF earnings
to support 1t.
sixth, Other competitive lines Of in
yestment present superior attractions.
Seventh. The railroad business IL
largely controlled by political instead
of business considerations.
Look Forward, Not Back.
we may debate abou. what has
caused the present conditions" said
Mr. Thorn, "but we cannot debate about
what the people need, The President
has taken the view that we must look
forward IN this matter and make q
lIcSll dSscSEme}lL CL SBIEuJUSEd1lCeB IN
order to deal helpfuIly and intelligent
ly with the problem. Abuses are
no more prevalent In the railroad buai-
ness today than In any other business
humanely conducted. The great ques-
ton now is whether the existing sys-
tenn OF regulation gives the public re.
liable assurance OF sufficient present
and future railroad facilities.
Those who oppose any change must
make their appeal on the ground that
the present systems assure the public
OF the continued adequacy of trans
portation facilities. If they do not. no
argument based on the desirability Of
the present dual system of regulation
Will be accepted by public judgment.
The question Of states rights is not
involved. If the regulation Of Transport
tation facilities privately owned should
fail government ownership must fol.