Burlington weekly free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1866-1928, 1916-03-16
COUNTY COURT IN SESSION
March Term Opens in Due and
Ancient Form.
Presiding Judge Expresses Desire to
Clean Up the Docket aud Dis
misses a Number Of Moss
Covered Cases.


The March term of Chttcnden coun
ty court opened at ten O'Clock Tues
day morning with Xed S, Stanton of
RoXbury as presiding Judge, and Fred
w. Hall of Essex junction and Henry
w. Tracy of Shelburne sitting as as
sistant Judges. Prayer was offered by
the Rev. Elliott Q. Foster of Essex
Junction, after which Sheriff j. IT, AL
len delivered the proclamation opening
the court for the term. During the
reading of the docket, which occupied
the entire morning, Judge stanton ex-
pressed his desire to dispose of every
case on the docket and dismissed a
number of cases which have been con-
tinucd from term to term for several
years
At the afternoon session, witnesses
were heard in the divorce cases of
Benjamin f. Starbuck VS.. l.. Aileen
Starbuck and Ruth NJ. Ripley vs.
Charles b. Ripley, but the testimony in
neither case was completed w. Scott
Mccarthy of Essex Junction was
brought into court to answer to an
information filed by States Attorney
Theodore f.. Hopkins. charging him
with embezzlement, but he refused to
| plead.
| CASES SCHEDULED FOR TRIAL.
Tho following cases are scheduled
FOR trial by jury during the March
term Mary NJ. Dakin ct al, vs.. estate
of Homer Kimball; Clark A. Rood vs.
| / of nj
H. II, Reynolds ct al; town of South
burlington VS.. Charles Marsh ct al; G.
B. Arnold VS.. f. X. Somers ct al: J. IT.
May vs.. s. T.. Pope; John Rient VS.. the
Snare & Tricst Co. (doubtfuD: the Old
Bee Hive vs.. Max l.. Powell; Arthur
L. Culver VS. Rutland Railroad COM
pany, doubtful; Mary A. Freeman,
apt. vs.. estate Of Frank F. Freeman,
katherine J. Freeman, admX.; n. w.
Van Cleve VS.. Eastern Fruit & Nut
Orchard company; John Forville vs..
John Casey; J. S. Hehon vs.. Fred
llowcs ct al; John Casey VS.. John For
Vile; Patrick O'Brien vs.. Henry Todd;
| in re Will OF Daniel Greaney, Henry
| tonlin ct al. special admir- property,
vs.. Nellie NJ. Greaney, contestant;
Moses Beaudrev vs.. George Dagenaise.
w Woods; Elmira Leclair VS.. ]. II. AL
lem George y. Jarvis VS.. Thomas Red
,inond
COURT CASES
/ The following cases are set for hearing
| by the court: Hartman, Goldsmith Il Co.
vs. the Vermont Wine & Liquor Co.; l..
tolodny VS.. Clarence Hicks. apt; Kate
NJ. Howard, executrix, vs.. William +. John
son and Dan Johnson; Fred Howes VS.
John S. Wilkins, apt: c. r. Wethcrby
and V. A. Billiard VS.. II. L. Wiley. apt,
j.. NJ. Kicker ct al. VS.. town of COlches-
ter; Eugene I. Allen VS.. o. G. Phelps &
Co; w. A. Eddy VS.. r. J. Pond apt. :
Charles IL. Stewart VS.. p. j. Poland apt. ;
Edwin $. MeiEs VS.. Thomas r. Clay:
Hamilton $. Peck, apt, VS.. estate OF
Michael i. Kelley, John r. Kelley. admr. ;
John Mitchell ct al ". A. Den.arco. apt.
| Walter Mack VS.. Gaylord w. Baldwin,
Rosetta Buster VS. Eva Masce aud tr.
Mary Rose Pratt vs.. William Crocher
Thomas Reeves, tn, bankrupt estate of
Thomas Redmond va. Katie Redmond !;
William Odlin. amir. estate of J. r.
Clark, vs., estate of r.. w. Peck, H. r.
Eutter, admir-, de bonis non, cum ties a =
mcnto anncNo; J. f.. Reeves, tn. VS. j. H..
Devno; c. Berry & Co. vs.. j. l.. Devino;
New England Publishing company vs.
a. b. Ashley, apt; Burlington Light 4
Power CO. VS.. city of Burlington: A. A.
a. Spoolins & Winding Co. VS.. O. H..
Kinds CO., apt; .\rvin poquette vs. Louis
Alpert; Leon Giguere VS., Eugene Martel,
Martin S. Villas, apt, vs. Henry FenwiclI
e. al; II. i. Cummings Construction Co.
! ". j. T.. eastman; Ashley 1Ioag vs..
p1tf l,, q,
co, VS.. Charles w Howe; Adeline Till
son VS. estate of Olrin i. Tillison, apt. e.;
Bachos Stepanian vs.. Tony r. Ogossian,
CASES CONTINUED.
The following cases We're continued
City Of Burlington vs.. Baldwin Refrig-
orator company; city of Burlington vs.
Daniel Mansour; Daniel Preston vs.. VIII
liam l.. White; Eugene f. Fowler vs..
Michael c. Callahan, apt; jacob With
co. VS., Joseph .Agel and trs.: Springfield
Brewing Co, vs., James A. Merrill: city OF
Burlington vs.. Central Vermont Railway
Co. and Shepard e. Morse Lumber Co.
. II. j, Cassard vs. r. II, Murphy. Homer
!, g. Tllotsou VS., Robert j. ShurtleH
Iiurkhardt brewing Co. vs. James A.
Merrill; a. Il. Warren ct al. VS. r. II
Murphy; Lucinda r. Andrews vs. Jed a
hodges, W. II. lupper vs. W. IL. BurnP
apt; Arthur G.. lsham ct al VS.. city OF
Burlington; Rutland Railroad Co. We
city Of Burlington; Berton O. Wetmore
admir-, VS.. James L. Narrck; Fannie T.
Cook VS., Clayton Nj. Bell ct al: Dwight
Warner vs. William Alpert and Louis AL
pert; Rutland Railroad VS.. city Of Bur.
i lington; Ielig Berger vs.. Joseph Yeti
Vermont Construction Co. VS.. i. T.. Back
us; +. y. Jewett VS. Buel White ct al,
the Duplex Printing Co. VS. the New.
Publishing Co; Eleanor w. Hale VS. towr
Of RoyaltOn William s. Hamil Co VS. r
II. Murphy; NJ. Il, Converse Son VS.
Champlan Mfg. CO.; Joseph Dorr VS.
Mary Northrop; town Of st. George VS.
IT. H. Tilley and trs, Free Press asso
, citation VS. l. n. Johnson; G. n. Baldwin
vs. George Palmer apt; Spear Martin
, | Fur CO. vs. o. Gilbert; W. w. Smith e
. al. vs. j. e Hunt, II. J. Mcmahon vs
+ John A. Ashby: McAuliNe Paper Co vs
|, Odule Gilbert, apt; Allen Bartlett Sho,
= Co, VS.. Odule Gilbert; John O'Ncil VS.
Royce d. Burns II, f. Feinberg VS.. H. J
q Cassard and tn; Arthur Wahlstrom vs.
. Joseph Shepard, apt; Aronzo Buono VS.
. Grovanno Faito Charles F. Black vs.
Benjamin Phelps ct al, apis. ]. w. Pag
vs.. Ralph DEMO, apt; Charles r.. Math
cws, admir-, VS.. Charles p. Harvey; f. g
- hdsit ('oal RcVerley iChtor