Honolulu star-bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1912-2010, 1916-12-13
BY AUTHORITY
NOTICE.
NOTICE.
PusLlc HEARlNc-JAN. 2. 1917.


PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT OF Ho-
TEL. STREET. BETWEEN NUU-
/ ANU AVENUE AND BISHOP
STREET. IN HONOLULU, TERRI
TORY OF HAWAII.
TO THE OWNERS. I4ESSEES AND
OCCUPANTS OF LANDS ABUT-
TING ON SAID STREET PROPOS-
ED TO BE ASSESSED FOR THE
IMPROVEMENT OF SAID STREET,
AND. TO ALL PERSONS INTER
ESTED GENERALLY.
NOTICE Is HEREBY GIVEN that in
accordance with Resolution No. Gas
and Resolution M. 654. the Board OF
Supervisors of the City and County OF
Honolulu propose to improve Hotel
Street, in the District Of Honolulu
aforesaid, upon frontage basis.
l. CHARACTER OF IMPROVEMENT.
Hotel Street shall be -widened along
the properties of John ID. Deter and
the Estate of James Campbell, be-
tween Fort and Bethel Streets. in
Guiding a reconstruction of all build
ings and other improvements, to con-
form to a new street line which Is
a continuation of the present prop
c-tv line of Hotel Street at Bethel
Street.
Il. FRONTAGE TO BE ASSESSED.
The entire frontage, both sides In
cluded, abutting on Hotel Street, to be
assessed for the said proposed i'm
provement begins at the southeasterly
property line of Nuuanu Avenue and
ends at the northwesterly property
line of Bishop Street, excluding the
frontages of John ID. Deto- and the
Estate of James Campbell, and is
divided into zones for assessment on
a graduated basis per front foot, as
follows:
ZONE I is made up OF all that
frontage, both sides Of Hotel street
included, lying between Nuuanu Az
enue and the southeasterly property
line of Bethel Street.
ZONE ii is made up of all that
frontage, both sides of Hotel Street
included, lying between the southeast
erly boundary of Zone andsthe north
westerly property line of Fort Street
ZONE III is made up OF all that
frontage, both sides Of Hotel Street
included, lying between the southeast
erly boundary of Zone II and the
northwesterly property line OF Bishop
Street.
M. ASSESSMENTS PROPOSED.
The proportion OF cost Of acquiring
new land for road widening and for
incidentals to be borne by abutting
property shall be paid by assessments,
as follows:
ZONE /. The frontage in Zone 1
subject to assessment (being 4Sb.5
teet) shall be assessed at the maxi
mum rate of e12.S2 per front foot.
ZONE III. The frontage in Zone II
subject to assessment (heing 1914
feet shall be assessed at the maxi
mum rate OF $3.50 per front foot.
ZONE III. The frontage in Zone III
subject to assessment (beihg 671.7
feet) shall be assessed at the maxi
mum rate of $12.S2 per front foot.
~. NEW LAND TO BE ACQUIRED.
The following described land is re-
quired for widening Hotel Street: .
Parcel (a)--John ID. Detor.
Portion of l.. G. A. 621.
Beginning at the east corner of this
piece, said point being the present
west corner OF Fort and Hotel Streets,
the co-ordinates of which referred to
the Government Survey Triangulation
Station "Punchbowl' are S4s.O feet
south. and 4124.24 feet west, as shown
on Government Survey Map No. sos,
and running by true azimuths:
u. 500 3y-13.20 feet along northwest
side of Fort Street;
2. 146o 22'-36.65 feet along new line;
8. 229o 14'-13.50 feet along L. c. A.
62l to new line;.
4. 1867 45,-S701 feet along old line
to initial point
Area 48S square feet.
Parcel (b)-James Campbell Estate.
Beginning at the east corner of this
piece, said point being by true All
muths and distance 1862 As 37.O1 feet
from present west corner of Hotel
and Fort Streets, the co-ordinates OF
said point of beginning referred to
Government Survey Triangulation Sta
ton "Punchbowl" being 1925 feet
south, and 4144.53 feet west, az shown
on Government Survey Registered
Map No. sos, and running By true All
muths:
/. 49o 14'-1S.5O feet along L. c. A.
621 to s. Reynolds;
2. 1862 22'-112O0 feet along new line;
8. 233o 50'-13.90 feet;
4. 325o 47'-33.04 feet along old line;
5. $50 1880 feet;
s. 1862 45'-77.9O feet along old line to
the initial point
Area 1884 square feet.
". ESTIMATES OF COST.
% Cost of acquiring new
land ..............-S4 V,VVV.VV
(2) Incidentals, Engineer
ing, etc. ............ l,OOO.OO
Total cost of Improvement. S4l 100000
| CD Proportion of cost to be
borne by the City and
County, 25e6 Of $780,
000.30 ...........:. Iu,uOu.VO
(4) Proportion or cost to be
assessed against abut-