The Washington herald., 1916-06-09
Equity Divisiea No. 2.
Justice STAFFORD.

Equity Dtvfsisa No. 2.
Justice stafford.
Grafton VS.. Grafton; rule as to alimony
pendente lite; counsel fees and costs re-
unable first Friday following day OF
service OF rule; plaintif's attorneys
Turnage & Quinn.
Lane VS.. Cooke ct al: order of pre-
confesso ordered and reference to Will
lam II. Shipley (examiner. by Justice
Gould: plaintiffs attorney George c
Gertmsn.
Riddle VS.. Hutcheson ct al; order pre-
confesso ordered and reference to Wfl'
lam H Shipley. examiner (by Justice
Could: plaintiffs attorney, George C.
Gertmsn.
Knott vs. Walter ct al order pro con.
fesso and reference to William II. Ship
ley examiner Cby Justice Could: plain
tir's attorney. George c. Gertmsn.
Scott VS.. Scott: order nisi; plaintiffs at
torney. E. H. Jackson; defendants attor-
ney w NJ. Williams. ..-...
Harry, administrator, VS.. Harry; de-
cree accepting resignation Of trustee and
appointing National Savings and Trust
Company substituted trustee tby Justice
Could: plaintiff attorney, w. c. Sulli-
van.
Illinois Surety Co. VS.. Katzmaier, trus-
tee ct al: rule returnsble June %; plain
tfff's attorney, B. E. Hinton.
Leo Simmons and d. S. Mackall
In re lunAcy Of Catherine Mann; order
appointing Mollie T. Dixon committee
bond 500.
Metropolitan Loan and Trust Co. VS.,
Washington Sflicate Brick Co.; rule as to
injunction returnable June %.
Motions for today at 10 a. m:
1-Rowzee VS.. RowEee; attorneys. Gies
-Diggs.
eHoweu VS.. Lindner: attorneys
Adrfaans-Shea.
s-Maxweu vs.. Maxwell: attorneys
Ridout. Frisby-Beckett, Stewart
t-vermueIe VS.. Vermuele; attorneys
Carter-Gies.
-speare vs.. speare; attorneys. Clep-
hane, Keyser-Wilson. Huidekoper &
Lesh.
SIN re estate of Martha E. Cofin.
Tin re estate of Rosa Roberts; attor-
neys, Stewart-Hill.
s-Castle VS.. Castle; attorneys, Toomey
& Toomey-Hawken & Havell.
Swelling VS.. yelling; attorneys, Shinn
e. Owen-Coombe.
fo-Prevost VS.. Provost; attorneys Block
-Koenigsberger.
u-Flanagan VS.. Arends; attorneys,
by-Smith-Sheehy.
1e-Mayer VS.. American Security and
Trust Co.; attorneys, Donaldson. Ellis &
DonaldsUn-Clephane, Hoehling. Peelle a
Ogilby. Lambert ct al
I3-Moran VS.. Moran; attorneys, Bend
helm. PretZfefder.
1+Madden VS.. Madden; attorneys,
Foster, Miller.
I-Mahoney vs. Mahoney: attorneys,
Jones' Ahalt-Orutt.
16-Farr VS.. Farr; attorneys. Giles
Bigones.
1-Thompson VS.. Oppenheimer; attor-
neys. Linkins & Ford-Tobriner &
Graham.
1e-Beauvais VS.. BeauVais: attorneys
Hutchinson-Toomey & Toomey.
2o-Dorsey vs.. Dorsey; attorneys, o Brier
-Whippler.
2-Noland VS.. Noland; attorney,
OBrien.
Pin re estate of Henry P. Clarkson;
attorneys, whippler-English, Fox
23-In re estate OF Elizabeth Varney;
attorneys. Fenning-Bacon. jr.. Coombe.
2-Maddox We Sucrow; attorneys, Cat
ley-Johnson, Wolf & Cohen.
2-SomerveH VS.. American Security and
Trust Company: attorneys, Baker
Donaldson, Ellis & Donaldson.
25-In re bankruptcy of William Henry;
attorneys, Wright & Wampler-Tucker,
Tobriner. Galley.
GIN re bankruptcy Of Katzer; attor-
neys, Wolf-Gardiner.
2s-In re estate of Addie Divine; attor-
neys. Fague, Cuttings.
2aO'Connor vs. O'Connor; attorneys.
Downing & Berry-Sholes.
2O-Warren, trustee. VS.. Staples; attor-
neys. Sholes, Sulliyan-Johnson. Shea.
1-Piper VS.. National Society OF Daugh-
ters Of the American Revolution; attor-
neys, Hoehling, Peelle & Ogilby-Millls
Thompson & Lsskey.
2-Campben VS.. Biggs-Redman; attor-
neys Ridout-Nerillat.
3-Needhan VS.. Donaldson: attorneys,
Tucker. Kenyon & Macfarland, Needham
Darlington Ridout, Linton.
S-Castleberg VS.. Martin: attorneys,
wolf-Bauman, Cromelin, Kintz.
55-In re estate of Stanhope Provost; at
torneys, c. Hackett-Baker.
55-American Fidelity Co. VS.. Interstate
Construction Company ct al; attorneys,
Blair-Laskey.
37-Richards VS.. McLarin; attorneys
Farmer-NcLarin Etheridge.
SIN re estate Of Calvin II. Chadsey;
attorneys. Lambert-Hudson.
2-Kenyon VS.. Mearns: attorneys
Tucker. Galley Tobriner-Clephane.
4o-In re estate OF John w. Branson
attorneys. Edwards, Ridout-Hnl, Ed
nuns, Richardson.
n-Central Pacific Railway Company
VS.. Lane ct al; attorneys, Moehling
Peelle & Ogilby.
Gin re bankruptcy of Johnson & Com
7