The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1916-05-06
LIQUOR HOUSES
Get 4 SETBACK
INHICHER COURT
Decision OF District Judge Up
held in Cooley Case.
Can't Collect for Goods Sold to
Former TOpekan.
LABOR LAW CLEARED UP
Supreme Court Rules on Work
mems Compensation Act.
City Livestock Can Be Kept in
a Barn.
Can't Collect for Goods Sold tC
Former TOpekan.
LABOR LAW CLEARED UP
Supreme Court Rules on Work.
mems Compensation Act.
City Livestock Can Be Kept in
Barn.
(supreme Court Decisions on page 17.)

--
,Su,,o,,,<, ,,,,,,..
'S"Pi oiio Soor' Dccisiois OH page i--)
OicL f,oo1a,- 51,e. >, ~. 49,. .. 49,. Co.
;-+:-. :,
iilS louor ueiiNereo 10 hlhn py
Daiiclser hroehers OF Kansas CITY dur
| ing the time Cooley was owner of the
! ToDeka baseball +aar, Tho s,,,,o,,
| court TODAY held the sale Of Iio,Iprs -
/ Cooley an evasion of the Kansas nro
/ hibitory liquor law and a affirmed the
verdict of the Sbawnee co,,,,+,. 1ie+,;o+ 80
court in denving the Houor cor,na,,,,
a Judgment i-'A tAoi ooiii t'aiiS
! Durine tho tim. f,oo,o,. ,,..,,- .......-
Of the Toneka WTas,+e,.,l j" as oM ,e ilei
| ball club. LIQUOR was on certain occa-
slons consigned by Danciger Brothers
OF Kansas City to themselves IN To-
peka. Here an agent is said to have
delivered the bills of lading 10 Cooley.
who took the liquor from the exnress
or freight offices
! When Cooley sold his hall team he
is said to have owed The Ksnsas an Ci.'s ne
liquor house several bnndred do11ars
Proceeds Of ~ "a a. hlnureo aoIiars.
the Dancis1e-s - +a 80, we're attacheo.
! Themselves ara n+he,. I;l' op'il IN loi
When tbe ossa - u ii9uoi nouSes-
denurre,. was srsfai,,e5 80 eiieu ior Irlal, a
~ D-ss ~ to1d 1ile uelehoant-
sale nras &c 80 ~ oS me court that the
| l1jI,;+c go fi q , Sioii u & tiie hdisaS pro-
H. ,4llr1 ~ raw iitle 10 the liquor
rescbe5 I-a7,1-a uiit!i =. tne shlpment had
| mai roas.o,1 &c =, was held' and for
! ~ eti+t icasoh tIle sale was made iE Kan
eas III VOCATION or law and the account
was not coilectahle in a court of rec
olu- IN one OF the cases the defend
dnt pleaded payment of the accounts
anu q jury round for him. II the 9TH
CT cases, demurrers were sustained
principal who employs an agent
10 make collections under circuna-
Stances which make the q ct a viola
tlon OF the criminal law, cam, at r1,.,i5,.z
( tam an action for the rtcove.4, NJ ~, =
mount collected - said Justice. N.so,1
] in deciding the case
Must Get an orda,.
yyyba, o.+,..-->N
oeeoieys win 1ees IN divorce
their sts oney nlusI get court orders for
oI,,d promptly II they would in
- = S; az part OF the decree
s1,nrerae co,,rt ,tat was tne ruling of the
9. ooPi ehie court To-Day IN case from
eoolty;
rteoecca M. Elsenbise secured a di-
ttN, 70 &c uecIes IRON }. M Eisenbise. An
1,,. ny Zee OF $z3o was allowed
lit ne a'.orhey, however, neglected to
9Scui lne Incorporation OF his fee in
eie NOW ne must bring a
~ saeo sun against Elsenolse to win
NJ. <.-.,
eo'iii't7'i9<itioti eases
! Ihe supreme court clarified some
OF the legal muddle surrounding in
terpretatlons or the Workmen's COM
pensation act when IT today passed on
ihree cases lnVoIVlng the big labor
Jaw
~ d SUI py ,, y Ialiey against
eile besl 4Iothers manufacturing com
pahy u "yalluotIe county the court
ti7II, IN. "a lpioyee WHO was par
go ,t .iltousn INJURY Goes not
isu t,ongb he ra,,.i tt.o
of +ha 0oe,,,na,. Ao+L ~ ~ plos l'.
tb.t of II Pt, roi.t Ia9I at, va
Iersnoon-Engiar co,,pen, ~ hi.t
ltTe s,1nren7e court re1Jareed TIC ectior
of the Wvandotte county Cjis+ric+ co,1rt
In tbis case tba court hold ~ ~,
! nIovee was entitled to ir.1ries which
| he received in connection with his
work but was not entitled 70 connen-
sation for alleged MALPRACTICE of s1r-
pany. A third case was that of Albert
| w 1ayIoI asdliis1 phe Sulzperser q q
oolis ooiii 81 .e,s
,,1J ooiio+ nie.u
ea+; 90 ~. dos+h of tis ,1nIIa,
&C., +,,o,,sb She con+ributed 70 bis
rSn ,t 1rba r-o,oo,, ii,,ad ,.,itt ~
> lie ord cbiId Tho nootber lived
narna 49, ~ tba home hut was not re-
! esrded as member Of the family.
| Horses Cows and Chickens EXEMPT.
| UbaD man keeos a horse a cow or.
! o+icl-ens in his harm he is NOT viola+
t,,g the citv health ordinance unless he
nersists In denositinr refuse in nIaces
Nat ,nake such an act dangerous to
1aaI+b or welfare of a community
That was the decree of the supreme