The Washington herald., 1916-12-05
D. c. Court Of Appeals.

Present: Chief Justice Shepard, Mr..
Justice Van Orsdel and Mr.. Justice Robb.
Hannis ]. Taylor and Herbert r. Col
well were admitted to practice.
2soo-Shoemaker vs. Diggs; death Of ap-
pellant suggested by Mr.. H. H. Classic.
3o12-Central Pacific Railway vs.. Lane;
on motion OF Mr.. A. A. Hoehling, appel
liant allowed to file supplemental brief.
Z6EWashington Steel and Ordnance
Company VS.. Martin ct al; on motion,
Mr.. J. c. Gittings allowed to withdraw
appearance for appellant
2Sf3-webster VS.. splain; argument
commenced by Mr.. d. w. Baker for ap-
pellant, continued by Mr.. M c. Van
Fleet for appellee and concluded by Mr..
D. W. Baker for appellant.
So2s-Hight VS.. Richmond Park Improve
nent Company; rule to show. cause why
writ Of prohibition should not issue; re-
turnable December II.
29es-Emery vs. Emery; argument COM
menced by Mr.. C. H. Merillat for appel
lsnt continued by Mr.. P. B. Cromelin
for appellee and concluded by Mr.. c. H.
Merillat for appellant.
291RMollohan VS.. Masters ct al; pc
tition for rehearing dismissed opinion
by Mr.. Justice Van Orsdel.
Patent appeal No. 1OSE-Gathmann vs..
Clarke; decision of Commissioner of
Patents affirmed; opinion by Mr.. Justice
Robb.
2g1s-Donovan ct al VS.. Mahoney; de-
cree reversed with costs, and cause re-
manded with Instructions to dismiss the
bill without prejudice to right OF plain
tin to institute further proceedings in the
event his title as sole heir of William l.
Mahoney may be established: opinion by
Mr.. Justice Van Orsdel.
2e4S-Gray VS.. Ward ct al: Judgment
reversed with costs and cause remanded
with directions to dismiss the came;
opinion by Mr.. Justice Stafford.
Patent appeal No. 1O43-Livingston VS..
Thompson; decision of Commissioner of
Patents affirmed; opinion by Mr.. Justice
Siddons.
Patent appeal No. ion-Manly VS.. jan
ney; decision of Commissioner of Pat
ents reversed and priority awarded
Manly; opinion by Mr.. Justice Robb.
216-Randle VS.. Washington Loan and
Trust Company. trustee ct al; decree re-
versed with costs and cause remanded for
a decree dismissing the original and sup
Elemental bills; opinion by Mr.. Justice
Van Orsdel
Patent appeal No. 1O66-In re Thomas
Grieve: decision of Commissioner of Pat
ents reversed as to claim 10; opinion by
Mr.. Justice Robb.
2sS-washington Railway and Electric
Company VS.. Scala; judgment affirmed
> with costs; opinion by Mr.. Justice Van
OrsdeI
275-Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance
Company VS.. Brown: argument COM
menced by Mr.. S. F. Taliaferro for appel
liant, continued by Mr.. F. R. Elder for
appellee and concluded by Mr. c. c. Mil
Ter for appellant.
Assignment for today:
SPECIAL CALENDAR
B-United States ex rel Southern Pa
cific Railroad Company VS.. Lane; attor-
neys, Hoehling, Peelle & Ogilby-Wright.
B-Hight VS.. Richmond Park Improve
ment Company; attorneys. Wright &
. Wampler-O'Donoghue
REGULAR CALL.
29so-shoemaker VS.. Digges; attorneys
294O-Pirkey VS.. Williams; attorneys,
Tucker. Kenyon & Macfarland, Bailey
Kratz
@51-Andrevs Paper Company VS..
Southern Soda Fountain Company; attor-
neys, Rosenberg Ridout-Williams
2S4-Washington Steel and Ordnance
Company vs.. Martin; attorneys, Cuttings,
hamberlin-Glassie
96-Washington Railway and Electric
company vs. Clark; attorneys, Hoover
ambert.
257-Wedderburn, tr., VS.. wedderburn;
tterneys Burke-David
963-Momt Vernon and Marshall Hall
-teamboat Company VS.. McKenney; at
orneys, Woodland, Wright, Wampler-
logan, Kaufman.
ompanyI attorneys, Cox, Sberier-Ho-