The Washington herald., 1916-06-23
Supreme Court, District of Columbia
Equity Division No. z
Justice Stafford.

Equity Dtvisiou No. z
Justice Stafford.
Parker VS.. Barry; order of publication; !;
plaintiffs attorney. d. Edward Clarke.
Williams VS. Beverly; order pro con-
fseso and reference to NJ NJ. Murray.
examiner; plaintiffs attorneys, ]. A
Maedel and George Francis Williams
Dshigren VS.. Real Estate Title Insur-
ance and Trust Company; order contin-
wing restraining order until anal hearing
and leave granted defendant to file
amended answer in twenty days; plain
tihs attorney, w. e. Lester; DEFEND
ants attorneys, Maddox & Galley.
In re lunacy of Thomas songstsr; or
der confirming report of auditor and dis
charging committee
Lynchburg Investment Corporation vs..
United States Trust Company; order Of
publication Cby Justice Could; plaintiffs
attorneys. Ellison & Donaldson
Brosnahan VS.. Brosnahan; rule as to
counsel fees and costs returnaole June
q; plaintiffs attorneys, Blaine Coppinser
w G. Gardiner, and W. J. Neale.
Clinton vs. Hoye; order Of publication
tby Justice Could, plaintiffs attorneys,
Fred Mckee and A G. Bishop.
Haymah VS.. Hoye; order Of puolica-
tion Cby Justice Could; plaintiffs attor-
neys, Fred Mckee and A @. Bishop.
Hazen VS.. Wood; order granting leave
to hls amended and supplemental bill;
order appointing John H Wood guardian
ad Item: order referring cause to John D.
Rhoades, examiner; order appointing
Mary l. Wood guardian ad Item.
Hight & Co. VS.. Richmond Park I'M
provement Company; order overrulins
motion to set aside order Of Intervention
and passing application OF injunction;
plaintiffs attorneys, Wright & Wamp-
ler; defendants attorney, John Ridout.
Motions for today at 10 a. m:
lin re bankruptcy OF James o. Cor
reiI; attorneys, Carter & Brooke-Mus-
grove, Shtnn, Gardiner.
MADDEN VS.. Madden; attorneys, Fos-
.1Mahoney VS.. Mahoney; Jones, Ahalt
-O1utt
LYNN VS.. Lynn; attorneys. Walker
SBeauvais VS.. Besuvsis; attorneys,
Hutchinson-Toomey & Toomey.
Swans VS.. Evans; attorneys, Clarke
Smith.
dorsey VS.. Dorsey; attorneys,
O'Brien-Whippler.
s-Reilly VS.. Reilly; attorneys, Block
Rhodes.
sNaylor VS.. Jefferson; attorneys, New
sone-Coombe.
1o-Broshahan VS. Brosnahan; attor-
neys, Gardiner, Coppinger, Neals-Plum-
ley.
11-Hecht VS.. Hecht: attorneys, Downs,
BAKER. Leany-COttier-BOyC.
12-Davis VS.. Davis; attorneys Sacks
Barker.
Is-Coleman vs. Coleman; attorneys,
Fovler-Krupsaw.
1+Ho1man vs. Hoffman; attorneys,
Hoover-Flynn.
ISThomas vs. Thomas; attorneys.
Gardiner. Neale-LAnbert.
1s-sfmonton VI. simonton; attorneys.
Clarke
Judson -. Tudzo,. ,,+o-r~r. y.s
fords, Solomon
1S-Merchant vs. Merchant; attorneys
Rhodes & Cromelin-Handy.
1s-Sorrell vs. Broun; attorneys, O'shea-
2o-Hood. Robey, Landon vs. Mencken-
Shoemaker. Rsrrick: attorneys. Dent
Burkart. Yeatman, Merillst, Davis.
4-Moore VS.. Larrick: attorneys, Bald
erston-Gertman, Ridout.
22Dulany VS.. Wazgaman; attorneys,
Maddox & Gatlsy-Mlllan & Smith.
23-American Surety Company vs.. Pen
nington; attorneys. Maupin-
+Dayenport VS.. Bartlett; attorneys,
Richardson & Wright
26American Fidelity Company VS.. In
terstate Construction Company; attor-
neys, Blair-Laskey.
8-Central Pacific Railway Company VS..
Lane ct al; attorneys, Hoehling, Peelle
and Ogilby-
r-Metropolitan Loan and Trust Com
psny We. Washington Silicate Brick Com
pany; attorneys, Baker, Lambert-Carusi.
2eClemens vs.. Galhher; attorneys,
Rhodes and Gro elin-Toomey Toomey.
2e-In re bankruptcy Of William Henry;
attorneys. Wright & Wampler-Tucker,
Tobriner, Galley.
G-O'Connor vs. OConnor; attorneys,
Downing and Berry-Sholes.
51-Warren, trustee, VS.. Staples; attor-
neys. sholes, suIlivan-Hayden johnson.
Shea
52-Pfper VS. National Society OF the
Daughters Of the tmerican Revolution;
attorneys, Hoehling, Peelle and Ogilby-
Mills, Thompson and Laskey.
5SNeedham VS.. Donaldson: attorneys,
Tucker, Kenyon and Macfarland-Darl-
inEton, Ridout. Linton.
2tIn re estate of Stanhope Provost;
attorneys. c. Hackett-Baker.
GSKepyon vs.. Mearns; attorneys, Tuck
CT. Galley, Tobriner-Clephane
SIN re estate of John W. Branson;
sttorpeys, Edwards, Ridout-HiIl, Ed
mund. Richardson
5T-Ensle vs.. Manchester; attorneys,
Davis-Nevmyer-Sulliv
3s-Crowe vs.. National stoksr Com
pany; attorneys, P. P.-Mltchell, Hufty.
3sLibbey VS.. Libbey; attorneys, Gar
rett-Mackall, Carter
to-Connor vs.. Connor; attorneys Git
tinss & Chamberlain-Darr 4 Peyser
H-Lasier vs. Lasier; attorneys, Dutton
Rhodes and Cromelin-Coombe.
2-Richmond Park Improvement Com
pany VS.. Hight; attorneys O'Donoghue-
Wright and Wampler-Ellis and Donald
son-Ferguson.
Circuit Dfvfsfon Ne 1.
Justice Gould