The Manchester journal. [volume] (Manchester, Vt.) 1861-current, 1916-04-27
JOHN HALL WATSON ana
MARIE LOUISE n. WATSON

vs..
JOHN HALL WATSON and
| MARIE LOUISE II, WATSON
In the Court Of Chanccry in said
Il County.
Whereas John n Dimond Of Man
chester, in the County Of Remington
state Of Vermont, has filed his bin ~
complaint IN the Court Of Chanccry
within and for the County Of Benning-
ton, against John Hall Watson and
Marie Louise H. Watson. formerly Of
Manchester, IN said County, and now.
as the complainant Is Informed and
believes, the said John Hall Watson
resides in England. and the said Marie
Louise II. Watson in the City. County
and State Of New York, therein set
ting forth
That on the fifth day Of August,
1908, the said John Hall Watson was
indebted 10 Edmond l.. Wyman in the
sum OF Three Hundred Seventy five
dollars, specified in one promissory
note Of that date, payable two months
after date TO the order of the said
Edmond l.. Wyman with interest an
|
Further setting forth that In order
TO secure payment of said note the
said John Hall Watson and Marie
Louise H. Watson by their mortgage
deed of that date, by them duly exc
cuted, acknowledged and recorded, did
convey TO the said Edmond L. Wyman
the following described lands and
premises situated in the town Of Man
chester, Bennington County, State Of
Vermont, viz:
Being the same lands and premises
conveyed to Lezem Bovey by Jerome
Gleason and wife by warranty deed.
dated July 18th, 1901, recorded in Vol.
"a, Page 1856, of the Land Records Of
said Manchester; reference being had
to said deed and the deeds therein re-
ferred to, and the Land Records afore-
said, for more particular description
of said land and premises; and the
said premises have this day been deed
ed to the said John Hall Watson by
Lezem Bovcy and wife" Upon condi-
ton that if the said note should not
be paid according TO its tenor, that
the buildings on said premises should
be kept insured for the benefit Of the
mortgage and that failing so to do
the mortgage might procure insur-
ance therefor and add its cost to the
mortgage debt:
Further setting forth that said note
and a large amount Of unpaid interest
thereon are due and unpaid, and that
the mortgage or the complainant in
this cause has caused such insurance
on said building TO be placed at large
expense and cost TO himself:
Further setting forth that said
and the note thereby secur-
ed were duly assigned and transferred
to the said complainant on the second
day Of April, 1915. for 4 valuable con-
sideration, and that this complainant
thoreupon became and still is the law
full owner and holder Of said mortgage
deed and note; and that of such
assignment and transfer the said John
Hall Watson and Marie Louise II.
Watson then and there had notice. and
payment of said note was thereupon
demanded of said John Hall Watson
by this complainant:
Further setting forth that the said
Iohn Hall Watson and Marie Louise
j.
execution Of said mortgage decd hus-
band and wife, but that since the date
IF execution Of said mortgage they,
.he said John Hall Watson and Marie
Louise " Watson have been legally
separated by a divorce granted to
and that they are
10 longer husband and wife. and that
he said Marie Louise II Watson has
10 interest whatever in said mortgag-
d premises.
And praying that said defendants
nay be decreed TO pay to the Clerk of
his Court, for the benefit of the com
claimant, the sums due and to become
lue on said note, and also whatever
um or sums he has been compelled TO
'ay by way of insurance premiums up
n the insurance policies issued upon
he buildings on said described lands,
ogether with the costs Of this action,
y short day TO be fixed by this Hon
rable Court, and in default thereof
hat the said defendants and all per-
ons claiming under them or either Of
hem, shall be forever foreclosed of all
guilty Of redemption in the premises.
nd that the orator may have a writ
( possession of said premises; that
he orator may be further relieved
cording to equity; and that writ Of
ubpoena be granted unto the orator.
irected TO the said defendants, the
aid John Hall Watson and Marie
ouise H. Watson, commanding them
D appear before the Court Of Chanc-
~ to be held at Manchester, within
nd for the County Of Bennington, on
ne first Tuesday Of June, 1916.
And it appearing that the said John
all Watson and Marie Louise II.
Watson are without the State Of Yer
lont, SO that said bill Of complaint
nd subpoena cannot be served upon
lem personally:
1T is THEREUPON ORDERED
lat they be required TO appear on the
rst day of the next Term of said
curt Of Chancery, to be held in Man
lester, in said County Of Benning-
N, on the first Tuesday Of June, 1916,
nd also that they be ordered and re-
Tired TO cause their appearance
ierein to be entered with the Clerk Of
I'D Court on or before the expiration
forty-two days from the date Of
i'd bill Of complaint, then and there
m arg.uaY. fkIr.fn Of Hf-EYIeR