The Washington herald., 1916-10-24
Supreme Court of the united States.

ldChennas 1OLulcss MI
dce Day. Mr.. Justice Van Devanter, Mr..
Justice Pitney, Mr.. Justice McReynolds,
Mr.. Justice Brandeis, and Mr.. Justice
Clarke
Harris Carman Lutlxtn. OF Chicago, Ill,
and Sidney F. Taiaferro, Of Fairfax, Va
were admitted to.practice.
The Chief Justice announced the follow
ing orders Of the court:
No. 816-Thomas Patrick Reyes, plain
tn IN error, VS.. the People Of the State
Of Illinois. In error to the Supreme Court
Of the State Of Illinois. Per curiam: Dis
missed for want OF Jurisdiction upon the
authority Of: l, Bergemann VS. Backer.
157 U. s., $50, 65s; Caldwell vs.. Texas,
1ST U. s. $50: Howard VS.. Fleming, lsl
U. g.. 12S 1s5; 2 Demins VS.. Carlisle
Packing Co., 22s U. s., 102, los; Consol-
dated Turnpike VS.. Norfolk, ETC., Rail-
way Co.. % U. g., sos, 800; overton VS..
Oklahoma, 235 Q. s., 81
No. a4s-Joseph W. Bull, appellant, Va
Hugh Campbell, II. Appeal from the
United States Circuit Court OF Appeals
for the Eighth Circuit. Per curism: Dis
missed for want Of Jurisdiction upon tho
authority OF: /, Bagley vs.. General Fire
ExtinguLsher CO. ~ U. g.. 81; shulthis
vs.. McDougal, Z25 U. g., 651; St Anthony's
Church vs.. Pennsylvania r. R Co.. 2a
U. s.. SIS; 2, Farrell vs.. O'Bren. Iss o. s.,
g. 100; Hull VS.. Burr. 234 U. g., 12. TO;
Merriam Co. vs.. Syndicate Publishing
Co, 81 Q. s., SIS. 81.
No. B3-Loulsvtlle & Nashville Railroad
Company, plaintiff in error, vs.. G. L.
Croan ct al. In error to the Court Of Ap-
peals OF the State OF Kentucky. Per
curtam: Judgment reversed with costs
upon the authority Of Northern Pacific
Railway vs.. Wall "a Q. g., 81; Cincinnati
& Pacific Railway vs.. Rankin. 10 o. &,
sa
No. Is+The Missouri, Kansas and
Texas Railway Company Of Texas ct al.
plaintiffs in error. VS.. Mrs. Emma A. Cas-
sadly, administrators, etc, In error to the
Court Of Civil Appeals for the Second
Supreme Judicial District OF the State OF
Texas. Per curiam: Judgment affirmed
with costs upon the authority Of Chicago
Junction Railway Co. VS.. King. 222 U. g.,
222; seaboard Air Line vs.. Padgett, 236
U. s. 6Ss, S7S-674: Great Northern Rail-
way Co. VS.. Knapp, 24O c. 8. 4S4
No W-John G. Christopher ct al.
plaintiffs In error, vs.. Jane Mungen and
Henry Mungen, her husband. In error
70 the Supreme Court OF the State Of
Florfda Per DURHAM: Dismissed for want
OF Jurisdiction upon the authority Of: L
Eustis VS.. Bolles 15O U. s., 361; Gaar,
Scott & Co. VS.. Shannon. 223 U. g., 46s,
40; Mellon vs. McCafrerty, 23e U. s, 134.
2 Deming VS.. Carlisle Packing Co, 26
Q. S. 1O2, 1o5; Consolidated Turnpike vs.
Norfolk, &c, Ry. Co, 22s U. S. 596, 6Oo7
Parker vs.. McLain, 2S7 U. s.. 469
No. - Orig1nal-Ex parte in the matter
OF the Indiana Transportation Company,
petitioner. Motion for leave to file Pc
tition for writ Of prohibition granted.
and rule to show cause ordered to issue
returnabIe Monday. December 4 next.
No. 1O3-Dan S. Lehon, plaintiff in err
ror. VS.. the City OF Atlanta. Further
consideration Of the motion to dismiss or
affirm postponed to the hearing on the
merits.
No. 47-The Arizona Copper Company.
Limited, plaintiff in error, VS.. Joseph B.
Hammer Further consideration Of the
motion to dismiss or affirm postponed to
the hearing on the merits.
No 47s-The Arizona Copper Company,
Limited, plaintiff in error, VS. Richard
Bray Further consideration OF the mo-
tion to dismiss or affirm postponed to the
hearing on the merits.
No. 42s-Southern Pacific Company ct
al, plaintiffs in error, VS.. Darneu-Taenzer
Lumber Company ct al Further consid-
Grafton Of the motion to dismiss or af-
firm and Of the petition for writ Of GER
tioraH postponed to the bearing on the
merits.
No 3S+Gur. Colorado and Santa Fe
Railway Company, plaintiff in error, VS.
Texas Packing Company. Ordered that
this case be placed on the summary
docket.
No. 541-wellsviTe OIL Company.
plaintiff IN error. VS.. Martha A Miller,
nee Everett, ct al Ordered that this
case be placed on the summary dock
ct.
No. sOo-F. A Dickson. plaintiff in
error. VS.. Luck Land Company. Or
dered that this case be placed on the
summary docket.
No. 659-Chicago and Northwestern
Railway Company, petitioner. vs. the
United States. Petition for a writ Of
certIorari to the United States Cir
Circuit granted.
No. 71s-The United States, petition
er. VS.. liver Englebretsen Ness. Peti-
ton for a writ Of certiorari to the
United States Circuit Court OF Ap-
peals for the Eight Circuit granted.
No 671-The State Of Ohio, petition
er, VS. Aaron A. Ferris, receiver, etc
Petition for writ Of f'certiorart to the
United States Circuit Court OF Ap-
peaIs for the Sixth Circuit denied
No. 698-The town OF Newbern ct al,
petitioners, VS.. tho National Bank of
Evansville, Ohio. Petition for q writ
Of certiorart to the Dnited states Cir
cult Court Of Appeals for the Sixth
Circuit denied
No. 6e4-Charles w. Parker et Al.
petitioners, VS.. Edgar W. Ross, guard
ian. etc Petition for = write Of certior-
ari to the United States Circuit Court
Of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
denied
No. 7o4-Ksystone Coal and Coke
Company. petitioner. vs. Michael
Fekete, etc;
No. 7o6-Keystone Coal and Coke
Company, petitioner, vs.. Frank Thry'
etc;
No. 7o6-Keystone Coal and Coke
Company. petitioner, VS.. Anna Helm
linger, etc; and
No. 7O7-Reystone Coal and Coke
Company, petitioner, VS.. Adam Muller.
Petition for writ Of certIorari to the
United States Circuit Court Of Ap-
peals for the Sixth Circuit denied
No. 7os-F. F. Slocomb and Company,
Inc. petitioner, VS.. A. C. Layman
Machine Company. Petition for writ
Of certiorari to the United States Cir
cult Court Of Appeals for the Third
Circuit denied
No. ul-EInott Varnish Company, Pc
tltioner, vs.. Sears, Roebuck 8 Co Pc
tition for a writ Of certtorar TO the
limited States Circuit Court OF Appeals
-