Honolulu star-bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1912-2010, 1916-11-17
BY AUTHORITY
NOTICE
PUBLIC HEARING. DECEMBER 5
1916 H.. .a.. .......~

~ BLiC HEARING. DECEMBER .,
1916 H.. "a@ ......
PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF M.
PR0VEMEST OF SMITH STREET
BETWEEN QUEEN AND BERE-
TANIA STREETS, IN HONOLULU
TERRITORY. OF. HAWAII Il:
TO THE OWNERS. LESSEES, ANDl
4 OCCUPANTS OF. LANDS. ABUT-
TING OK SAID STREET PRO-
POSED TO BE ASSESSED FOR
THE IMPROVEMENT OF SAID
STREET. AND TO ALI PERSONS
+ INTERESTED GENERALLY. -.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that
in accordance with Resolution No. 632,
the Board of Supervisors of the City
and County of Honolulu propose to
modify the plan to improve Smith
street, in the District OF Honolulu
aforesaid. upon frontage basis.
/. CHARACTER OF IMPROVE
MENT AND MATERIALS ~:
r ~ Grading. - -: .........
CD Setting lava rock curbing.
90 Constructing concrete" cutters
80 inches wide. .=.* ... ....>. nj:
Cd Paving the entire Improvement
with Pinch '.Bitulithic" surfacing on
a concrete base ) inches i'll thick
ness. ..:: ~.:~:s
H. FRONTAGE TO BE ASSESSED
Sub-District "a" - -.
The entire frontage, both sides in
cluded, abutting upon Smith street
and between the mauka property line
Nf .s.fr lSai
.erty line of Beretania street, exclud-
ing the frontage of the Dowsett Com
pany, Limited, constitutes Sub-District
A." and is divided into zones for
assessment ON 2 graduated basis per
front foot for the cost of acquiring
new land, as follows: .....
Zone is made up of that frontage
in Sub-District IA lying between
Queen street and the points on the
property lines midway between King
and Hotel streets. 49,. -. T..
Zone u is made up of that frontage
in Sub-District "A" between the nor
therly boundary of Zone | and the
points in the property lines midway
between Hotel and Pauahi streets.
Zone 10 is made Up of that frontage
constituting the balance of Sub
District "A" =.
Sub District "B" .......:.. =.
The entire frontage, both sides in
cluded, abutting upon Smith street be-
tween the mauka property line Of
Queen street and the makai property
line of Beretania street, constitutes
Sub-District B. to be further as
sessed on a uniform basis per front
foot for the general Improvement, ex-
Guiding the cost of acquiring new land,
and for new curbing where necessary.
III. ASSESSMENTS PROPOSED
Sub-Distriet "a"
The proportion of cost of acquiring
new land for load extension to be
borne by abuti;ng property shall be
paid by assessments against the front |
age in Sub-District "A" as follows:
Zone I. The frontage in Zone l, sub
ject to assessment (being 1047.39 feet) |
shall be assessed at the maximum rate |
of $6.52736 per front foot.
Zone u. The frontage in Zone II, |
subject to assessment (being $3.50
ft) shall be assessed at the maximum
rate of $5.12776 per front foot.
Zone III. The frontage in Zone III, !
subject to assessment (being 1064.75
feet shall be assessed at the maxi |
mum rate of $3.03066 per front foot.
Sub-District "B"
The cost of the general improve |
ment, excluding the cost of acquiring |
new land and the cost of new curbing, |
shall be paid bv an additional assess |
ment against the frontage, both sides |
included, in Sub-District "B" (being |
2853.0 feet) at the maximum rate of
$8.44 per from. foot. ." -E.
The cost of new curbing shall be
paid by a further assessment at the
maximum rate CT s045 per front foot
against abutting lands in front of
which the same shall be laid.
~. NEW LAND TO BE ACQUIRED.
New land to be acquired shall be !
the same as heretofore advertised.
V. ESTIMATE OF COST.
"a The maximum estimate
of the entire cost of the i'm -.
provement, including engi-
neering and incidentals. $44, 1881
(2) The maximum estimate .>..
for new curbing ......-.. 549.O0
60 The maximum estimate
of general improvement, -.~.-
excluding cost of acquiring .....~s-
new land &C.,. 24,O53.S5
(4) The maximum rate to 49,.
be assessed per front foot .-......
for general improvement, "
excluding cost of new land
is S44
(5J The maximum rate for ~
new curbing per front foot j." =.
is ......... ~ O.45
COST FOR ROAD EXTENSION.
60 Cost of acquiring new ~*.i
land ..........., -. 1s,s35.75
ca Proportion of cost to be f.: i
borne by City and County,
SO 1-sR ................. s,s45.25
90 no -