The Oroville weekly gazette. [volume] (Oroville, Wash.) 1905-19??, 1916-09-01
PAID ADVERTISEMENT.

10 the ELECTORS OF Okanosan County.
l beg u few words IN reply 10 an article
published in the Independent % August
seth by Judge Z. h PendsrsasI- The AZ
tiele in itself Is harmless and irrelevant.
though evidently published with the in
tent 10 iGJurs ME in the eyes OF the voters
OF Okanosan ami Ferry counties.
II is true that supported and assisted
Prosecuting Attorney of Okanosan county
in Isle for which have no apology 10 o.
fer. his record a. such ofslcer Is not AZ is
sue IN TINS cArnpAlsn However let Is eN-
anime the proposition:
The Auditor annual report .or lsl9, the
the year proceeding Frsd's term gives the
eost .; the prosecuting attorneys office ST
siSleSS % which s>SS-V0 MAS Tor \ StslsOs
raphsr and $>Sl. % WAS fer assistance 10
the prosecuting attorney. The entire cost
s&.Ns.SS During the two years term. 1911
and lSls. the prosecuting attorneys office
was NOT iurnlshsI a stsnosrapasr for &
single day. The s@ll.0@ mentioned in the
article above referred 70 WAS for services
rendered IN the superior court IN rsrNortirss
the cass % Olivsr RriGss C, " OkanosaI.
county. and for making : transcript OF the
testimony taken 81 said Trial tcg AZ SppsSl
70 the supreme court. ana rot tor >srv icaS
performed IN the proSs<uiirs attorney :
ofIlee OF for the prcSscuuns attorney.
During the term covering 1911 and 1919
there Was couSiGsEac.s heavy ltIsSLNl al
fssuns ne SoGnW. The oAysS Bridse
s+,sRaoa claimed by the cDcuaty IS damages
for \ detective bridge Smith & Gresham
StlO my SEX were SEtsaoSSI el LlS county
10 prosecute the case The case was tried
10 = !Qry snd the jury allowed the co1nsS
an offset .. nearly s2,SaAtA We advised
an SppSSl 20 the supreme court and 6i-
rects6 the stsssoSrSpGsr VINO rsI,0rTsI the
case - prepare = transcript u the tsS-
tir,loay. which WAS done Thsrsupon the
Bridge Company showed y further rsiGc
ton and offset u some s.. Slt> ~. 2ssrs-
gains about SSS@2.ao saved 70 the tN9la-
~ BY virtue % the litigation During the
same year the Great Northern ESlrNSi
a
Federal court at Spokane against tae
county for the cAccS-l2Coc q taxes asses
: ls1Ss Sum. Vas sia rs = sssss: X
the defense u that acton. SrG after
much Investigation ard preparation in
chains trip VIII NJ. EdSesrt, ire c'oUn-
promised by the co-sr2Sy raging - -
county large part - ne taxes scusng
term there we7s many p7asscuIi0as fSr
violations % tire hScSl option lnl,aar law
and ! assisted IL the pCNsscGIlc0 q al
siderable sums in anss c,,lectsd du-ias
the two terms he greater part q vesch
were for NSelAcic-.s - TIE hc@2- @Sv. 7 =
Wright and E l. P,cSs1 svi3S1-ly CO.,
s.3e-sS RE worthy - employment and &C.
,tteS 70 the eoIzlpS2SAtsoa ths-eAtIs- paid
ne for TIE SERVICES rendered From tas
figures given in the article. u shows that
| received frcEl TIE county daring tie rNy,
yeSrs sSs&ee, for al % which rendered
20 the hoard % couRty commissioners &rG
other county c<clcS-s during re term To-
which l r,a3s 10 charge snj -s'ceIvs.+ 70
eNNr,pS1SSc.c1-
TIE article SHOWS c.hsr items .: So
SUES paid - C'Cc-rc- WI,1iS--S ard
Hc<Syn- These items were to- services
rendered II cks Justice GsN.1-- ~ S-sNS-sr
o-oyiils S-3 MISC :; eSlrs less sxre2-
s5ys 20 ire county tSS1 - ray tie sN
p<csss q the prosecuting attorney -
these different points - rsp-sSs2. tie
cc2aty IN sDch CASES Sc = -s-is7 os-s,s
,h2. 3: tat tine there WAS - -sL-oSG
II the county soctA y o7cvt-ls- an1 I.7Av-
occGy. TIE county ssa-. - No,sc1 ans
ctAs- OUTSIDE points would >oSr - -,,cs
o. more ieA2 cc8-ssS to- A. OUTSIDE 4;;c--
cor0ssS.c1s-S understood -. &-3 2c,,l-I-
escSt - the c-S-Ssc-,a-, ana showed 80
eSfs tAs-sfor. 2,& tes practice 1S6 Beer
re lien Z si5N = y : Graz, a.
:rssl 5. nu1Ss~ u crf-,s1.si :sses a. a.
t-ss teri, - Sc--t AFTER Ais sfsct;o-- s-3
~atcs r-osse-C,>-s rSSI,cs,: l. t1s rsy
meat - ire coG-Sx - = considerable sur
- rsonsy - s-ss assessed ~ ne cou-.
I'm cccvtc.tccS>
re st99-99 ras3 Wa c Bow- vas
= presenting case rsc&scs o 2rPssl
rSssE r-to- - Trs>;s tern, C ossscs. VIZ
wAtch Judge S-owr v-2s cocvs-s3-E S-,&
rHs commissioners ss=-rsS: = stsvj<S -
tc- eir, - 9rssh ire c2ss.
II vii es remembers: -Asc Iss sa-ss
S1vec II tie article covers 4 ri term g
~, years As ~ hare ssiG ,As cnG--v 80
ess- e---ises-s 80 prosecuting 2rcc--sTs
ce-Scs 4 scs-cSrS pAsE r-e>- - lttt -HS-
TIE S-csscu-1-s s--r--@y eAS Sssc <---
ESs3 with 4 <-sccz-s-es- a. 81 -f-ss ss-,S
-es extra -tssc - E'-S.s's ter s-ss vs--
r-rce-N ~. Ne rhs-S s-3 YET r,---'zSi-,t
= -1aSs - .As sE-t % sxrs15s,5 :cC s-s-cc-
-Srns-s services = reporting a.: --sS1-s
4 transcript - 4 .ivll -Sss 20 49, PR
csSs % Srrsai
Having ss<ss-s: E-s.s - re ctftcs A..
.ss-s csS-s --sA S<st,,-'r ,i-sS2-oc- a.
seccs-s re csG--r. civil s-G criminal,
more cAA- c1s lar ~,Gi: --,-S-fv s&-s5
~ -Sa>c- - -As -sv -Slf-r1; ,'ccS---,, -
ans ccAs- t--ccvs- s--s = 10 cc-Cv ?
thought i nv 31-- - see tat c-s Isl
.SSs q tes os1scs E;SS r-ccS-iE .2Ss- -x-s
g tSS-stccs : resigned a. I-ls<s - -
esi- 49, - s-s rS-1s :, CSs-.,<S- -,---.-g
z-S SSs.ses,s = 80 ,eSSrs ---G - r3-ss
% 80 -s---, ----t,.-- 49, - ~ -s,- sN-s--
ss sF-s-acvs.s = 80 S-s.-ixt ASS - -t,,--
~ 7 ss-c Ssf-A ~t-N - r=-nris - oSS1-
-cza- rc---T
L sas HsS- sd = -,- ~ ssSs-s =
s-s2- t-,= srcs-s-< ---o Any --1s
.cce-cTs-Sis< tc-sls- - 80 s-S,s.,r a :
Sc r>Es-- -Ss ssis.st3cc - s-1sSs - 90
s.zcsrio- ccC-t - tHs -sU- scs1--S -s---
I esiisvs tS2r appreciate - s<-i-- n,