The Manchester journal. [volume] (Manchester, Vt.) 1861-current, 1916-05-04
ORDER or PUBLICATION
No. gN2i

4 Whereas. loha Il. nimona az Man.
i chester N The County 81 Bennington.
state Of Vermont has filed his hll AZ
4 complaint In the Court OF Chapecrv
e within and for the County ~ Bcnning.
I ton, against John Hall Watson and
Marie Louise II. Watson. formerly Of
! Manchester, In said County, and no,y.
e as the complainant II iaforfned and
, believes, the said John Hall Watson
! resides IN England and the said Marie
Louise II. Watson IN the City. County
I and State Of New York. therein set
/ ting forth
That on the 9th dav Of August
! 1903 the said John Hall Watson was
indebted 70 Edmond L. Wyman in the
sum of Three Hundred Seventy.five
dollars, specified in one promissory
note Of that date, payable two months
after date to the order Of the said
Edmond l.. Wyman with interest am
nually and for value received:
4 Further setting forth that in order
to secure payment Of said note the
said John Hall Watson and Marie
Louise II. Watson by their mortgage
deed Of that date, By them duly exc
Icutcd, acknowledged and recorded, did
convey to the said Edmond l.. Wyman
the following described lands and
/ premises situated in the town of Man
chester Bennington County, State Of
Vermont viz:
Being the same lands and premises
/ conveyed to Lezem Boyey by Jerome
Gleason and wife by warranty deed,
dated July 12th. 1901 recorded in Vol.
"a, Page 3S6, of the Land Records of
! said Manchester; reference being had
/ to said decd and the deeds therein re-
icrred 60, and the Lard Records afore-
! said, for more particular description
Iof said land and premises; and the
said premises have this day boon decd
ed to the said John Hall Watson bv
/ Lezcm Bovcy and wife, Upon condi-
tlon that if the said note should not
be paid according to its tenor, that
the buildings ON said premises should
be kept insured for the benefit Of the
lnortgagoe and that failing so to do
the MORTGAGE might procure insur-
anco therefor and add its cost to the
mortgage debit
Further setting for'h thnt said note
and large amount Of unpaid interest
thereon are due and unnaid. and that
the noftgagcc or the complainant ia
this eeuse bas caused such insurance
on said building TO he rlacod n large
cHponse and cost to HIMSELF
Further sotting forth tbat said
MORTGAGE and the note thereby sraur-
ed were duly assigned and Transferred
TO thu eaid c0upaiNaat on tla second
daror April 1915, ror q amaho corr
aidcation and Tint this complainant
thereunnn become and sti'i IS the law
fVl owner and holder If eaid nostcspe
decd and note; end teat 81 such
assignment and transfer tho a'd John
Hall Watson and Mario I0Aise III
Watson thcn and there had notice and
Payment 0f said note was thoroupon
demanded Of said John Hall Watson
by this complainant:
Further setting forth that the said
John Hall Watson and Marie louise
1T Watson were AZ the time of the
execution Of said mortgage decd hus-
band and wife, but hat since the date
or execution 81 said mortgage they,
fhe said John Hall Watson and Marie
Louise r. Watson have been lepally
separated by a divorce granted to
and that they arc
no LONGER husband and wife, and that
the said Marie Louise n Watson has
no interest whatever in said mortgag.
ed premises.
And praying that said defendants
may be decreed TO pay to the Clerk Of
this Court, for the benefit Of the com
plainant, the sums due and TO become
due on said note, and also whatever
sum or sums he has been compelled to
pay by way of insurance premiums up
on the insurance policies issued upon
the buildings on said described lands,
together with the costs Of this action,
by a short day to be fixed by this Hon
Orable Court, and in default thereof
that the said defendants and all per-
sons claiming under them or either OF
them, shall be forever foreclosed of all
equity of redemption in the premises,
and that the orator may have writ
Of possession of said premises; that
the orator may be further relieved
to equity; and that a writ Of
subpoena be granted unto the orator,
directed to the said defendants, the
said John Hall Watson and Marie
Louise H. Watson, commanding them
10 appear before the Court Of Chanc-
Try 70 be held at Manchester, within
and for the County of Bennington, on
.he first Tuesday Of June, 1916
And it appearing that the said John
Hall Watson and Marie Louise II.
Watson are without the State Of Yer
mont, so that said bill Of complaint
and subpoena cannot be served upon
hem personally:
IT is THEREUPON ORDERED
hat they be required to appear on the
irst day Of the next Term Of said
COURT Of Chancery, 10 be held In Man
hester, in said County Of Benning-
on, on the first Tuesday Of June, 1916,
md also that they be ordered and re-
Iuired to cause their appearance
herein TO be entered with the Clerk Of
aid Court on or before the expiration
f forty-two days from the date Of
aid bin Of complaint, then and there
0 make answer thereto, otherwise
hat said bin will be taken as con
egsed against them; and that the
rator do publish this order three
geeks successfully in the Manchester
ournal, newspaper printed IN Man
k,e.nv ga fha (ouptv of BppuInVtOn.