The Hayti herald., 1916-05-25

and only heirs at law one Mary M.
cloud and one Elizabeth Mcfarland;
| hat said Mary M. Cloud, married a
nan named Green and was known
rs designated, as Mary M. Green, and
at another time during her lifetime,
he said Mary M. Cloud was married
o man named Grymes and was
known and designated as Mary M.
Grymes, and that by mesne convey
,nces this plaintiff has acquired and
is now the owner of all the right,
title, interest and estate of the said
Robert II. Cloud, deceased, by and
| through his sole and only surviving
heirs at law, the said Mary M. Cloud,
arl Elizabeth Mcfarland; that the
apparent claim of right, title, inter
es. or estate of the defendant. Wal
ter Gldwell is based upon a iudg
M mt cf the Circuit Court of Penis
60 County. Missouri, duly rendered
or TIC md day of March, 1907, i'm
cause then pending in said circuit
rCurt, wherein one w. II. Foley and
My Foley his wife, Edith King
al u. King. Ben p. Jones, John
II ,Cs and Bank of Hayti, a corpora
tinn were plaintiffs and l.. f. Nicol-
nj es and he said Walter Glidwcll
", re defendants. but plaintiff says
Il! { said defendant Walter Glidwell
w. merely the tenant of the said
l.. +. NicGlaidcs and did not claim
AZ fight, title. interest of estate in
ana to said west half of the south
east quarter of said section thirty
siy above mentioned. other than as
the tenant of the said L. F.. Nicol-
al l,nf 1,nt ~ x,f
judgment decrecing the right, title.
interest and estate of said land into
the defendants was and is an error
and should have only decreed the
same into the said L. F.. ,Nicolaides.
and hat said judgment should be so
corrected. and modified as to ex-
clude the said defendant Walter
,ilidwell from any apparent right.
tile. interest or estate in to the west
half of the southeast quarter of said
section thirty-siX above mentioned;
that the defendant, Otto Buehrmann.
claims some right. title. interest or
estate in and to the east half of the
southwest quarter of said section
thirty-siX. above mentioned. by vir-
tue OF two certain warranty deeds ex-
acutcd by one Abraham Monsor and
one Chas. A. Davis; but PLAINTIFF
says that neither the said Abraham
Monsor or the said Chas. A. Davis
ever had or owned any right. title.
interest or estate in and to said east
half CT the southwest quarter of
said section thirty-six. and that there
fcre the said Otto Buehrmann never
lcuuricd and does not now own any
right, title interest or estate in and
to said land that in his lifetime the
said j. ID. Tinsley acquired a tax
deed from one Coleman, who was at
that time Collector of the revenue
Cf and for said Pemiscot County, for
said east half of the northwest quar-
ter of said section thirty-siX. but
plaintiff says that said deed convey
ed no title whatever into the said j.
u. Tinslcy, for the reason that no
Judgment for taxes was ever obtain
ed against any person who ever own
Cd said land, nor was any Judgment
for taxes ever obtained against said
l1nd, and that therefore said tax
deed was and is null and void and
Should be by the court set aside and
f'r naught held.
rlaintiff further states that by
virtue of long continued possession
of said land by plaintiff and his
GIantors and those under whom he
claims title, and by reason of the
facts that no one nor any of the de-
PENDANTS or any one under whom
they might or could claim title to
said land. have been in possession of
said land during more than thirty
one years last past, and that no one
nor any of the defendants, nor any
one for them, or any one under
whom they might or could claim
title to said land, has paid any taxes
on said land, or any part thereof,
during more than said period of thr-
ty-one years last past, the title to
said land has vested in plaintiff, who