The Washington herald. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1906-1939, 1916-03-21
COURT PROCEEDINGS
Supreme Court of the United States
MONDAY, MARCH 40. 1916.


Present: The Chief Justice. Mr. Justice
Mekenna. Mr.. Justice Holmes. Mr..
Justice Hughes. Mr.. Justice Van De-
Nanter. and Mr.. Justice Pitney.
James R. Fitzgibbon, OF Newark, Ohio;
; NJ Douglass. OF Mansfield, Ohio;
Eugene 5. Gibbs, OF Minneapolis, Mimi;
5. r Lewis. Of Tulsa, Okla; c. S.
Wagner Of Helena, Mont; Alvan Waldo
Hyde, OF Hartford. Conn; Charles +.
Kingsley, OF New York City; Vincent NJ.
Brennan, of Detroit, Mich; d. A. Sachs,
r.. OF Louisville, Ky; Scott Kenfield, OF
Akron. Ohio, and Clarence NJ. Oddie, OF
San Francisco, Call were admitted to
practice. a
No 1s1. E. B. johnson ct al, plain
tins In error, vs.. F. E. Riddle. In error
TO the Supreme Court Of the State OF
Oklahoma Judgment affirmed with
costs. Opinion by Mr.. Justice Pitney.
No. go Great Northern Railway Com
pany. plaintiff in error, VS.. D. B. KNAPP.
= In error to the Supreme Court OF the
State of Minnesota. Judgment attlrrned
with costs Opinion by Mr.. Justice
Hughes.
No. 2i1. Cast Realty and Investment
Company ct al, plaintiffs in error VS.
the Schneider Granite Company. IN
error to tire Supreme Court Of the stare
OF Missouri Motion for leave TO ne
petition for rehearing denied. opinion
By Mr.. Justice Holmes
No. so Southern Wisconsin Runway
Company, plaintiff in error, VS.. the CITY
OF Madison. In error to the supreme
Court OF the State Of Wisconsin Juos-
ment affirmed with costs. opinion Oy
Mr.. Justice Holmes.
No. go The CuyahoEa River POWER
Company appellant, vs. the CITY OF
Atron AppeaI from the District Court
Of the United States for the Northern
District of Ohio. Decree reversed with
costs, and cause remanded LOT luF I. H
proceedings in conformity win I e
opinion OF this court. opinion Oy NIL
Justice Holmes
eific Railway Company, plaintiff IN err
ror. VS.. A P. Bond. administrator, eSc.
error to the Supreme Court OF thS
state OF oklahoma; Judgment TeEerseu
WIKI costs, and cause reInahueu ~
further proceedings not inconsistent WI" W.
The opinion OF this COURT oplhlOh "
Justice McKenna.
ussintin in error, VS.. ]. II. Wiles- as al
rafnistrator, etc. In error 10 the gu
pverne Court of the State OF Minnesota
Judgment reversed with costs, and cause
rernanded for further proceedings not m
eo9sistent with the opinion OF TINS coui -
obfplon by M. Justice Mckenna-
Nn The United States OF America,
aa1sTlant vs. the United States steer
CORPORATION ct al: order entered 10 senu
up. testimony in its original form ana
time for fling the record extended sixty
DAYS from March ID; opinion by Mr.. Chiet
Idsfloe White
The cNet justice also announced the
following orders s9f the court; e,.,.
f8+Farnsrs %d Merchants 9tdIs
Bank OF Waco, appellant VS.. NJ {: ii,
PARK trustee of the Slayden-kirksey
wuolen NH. bankrupt; appeal from the
Tinted States Circuit Court OF Appeals
for the fifth Circuit; per curtain; Juos-
rnent affirmed with costs upon the an'
thorfty Of First National Bapk VS.. Lit
tIehsId. a7s U s. No. I12; Washington
SECURITY Co. vs.. the United States, 81
H. s rs IS; Wright BlOdgett Co VS. the
United States. Z55 L. S. 59T, i02 National
Pank OF Athens VS.. Shackelford, trustee
= U. 5. 81, 50. for the Western District oil
Texas.
o-Rosa Falco. representing her minol
child Manual AdoaldO TiberiO Catinch
v Falco. appellant. vs-- the succession OF
Salvador Suau Mulet, composed of his
widow. Maria Hernandez Rodriguez et
al: appeal from the Supreme Court Of
Porto Rico. Per curiam: Dismissed fol
want Of Jurisdiction upon the authority
of Section pa Judicial Code; ElizaburI
vs. Chaves. 239 L. 5. 2S3. 81; Gsell VS.
Insular Collector, go U.IS. &C.
No. III. David Fl. Glass. appellant, Tvs
" Alfred Fl. W Oo0nlan ct al.s appeal iron
the United States Circuit Court Of APP
peals for the Eighth cirSuit. Per curiam
dismissed for want of Jurisdiction upor
the authority of % Basley V. Genera
Fire ExtingUisher Company, PIP L. S. Al
Omaha Electric Light and Power Com
pany vs.. Omaha. 80 L. 5. 12S; st. An
thony Church VS.. Pennsylvania Railroad
Company 81 L. :. go. 576-577; % st
louis etc Railroad Company VS.
wabash Railroad Company. 2I7 L. S. 247
80: Ohio Railroad Commission VS.. Worth
fngton. -. u. $. 1Gl. 1Oi; Shulthis VS.. Nc
Dougal. 225 L. S. 56l, 56S.
The petition for writ of certiOrari /
denied.
No. 2s4 F. P ssekatz. plaintiff in er
ror. VS.. the. Medina Valley Irrigation
Company ct al: in error to the Distric
Court Of the United states for the West
ern district Of Texas. Per CuTiam: Dis
missed for want of jurisdiction upon tn
authority of % Consolidated Turnpike VS.
Norfolk, etc, Railway Company CZ2s U
s 5sS. ssOO: Manhattan Life Insuranc
Company VS.. Cohen C2S4 u. S. 123, $50
fostering Lumber Company vs.. Pierc
f&s5 U. s, 500: CD Mississippi and Re
River Boom Company VS.. Patterson,
a. 4Gs: MadisonviIIe Traction COmpan
We. St Bernard Mining Company, 1876 [
sss. Mason City. etc, Railroad Com
Many VS.. BoSuton, 2Oi L. s. SO; 60 Chi
cago, Burlington and Quincy Railroa
Company vs. Chicago, 165 u. ;. 20, ~
st5. Baunan VS.. Ross. 1S7 L. S. 54S, 50;
Rec<us VS.. Fort street DeVpt Compan!
lsg u S. 81. $50; 90 Halibrook Irrfgatio
District vs. Bradley, l4 L. 5. il.
Hairseon vs. -Danville and Western Raj
VA company, 2oS U. s. 59S; O'Nein VI
Iesner. 20 s. PA. 255-2S4.
No. -. original. Elk parte in tn
matter of Paul Bulva, petitioner; motto
for leave to file petition for writ OF MAI
dsTnus denied
No. -, original Ex parte in II
matter of William Sage, IT.. petttione
motion for leave to file petition for Wr
of mandamus denied.
No. 81 Hamilton-Brown Shoe Compan
netitioner, vs. Wolf Bros. & Co; motto
to amend Judgment herein denied.
No. $50 Bankers Trust Company, tru
Tee. appellant. VS.. the Texas and Pacif
Railway Company ct al; motion to az
vance granted and cause assigned for a
! clrnent on Monday. April 80, after II
cases heretofore assigned for that day.
No s6. David Lamar vs,Nthe Unite
fal N