Arizona republican., 1916-10-15
DRUNKARD'S JOY THE BLISS OF
 INTOXICATION
(Continued from Page One)


 can desire war? I do not desire war l do not desire petty wars l do not desire war in Mexico to satisfy a per sonal vindica tiveness against dis liked ruler. 1 don't like that kind of war.
 T believe in correct policies. They will keep us out of war. The sort of thing we have been having will not keep us out of war. It will embroil us in difficulty It did embroii us in ! difficulty in Mexico.
 We wish well to all people; we de- sire to have prosperity throughout the world, but we have a particular care here. Unless we take care of our own, we shall never serve humanity. Un- less we develop the great opportunities of the United States we will serve no one whatever I am for America first and America efficient.
 Our friends on the other side seem to think that everybody who disagrees with them wants war Well, thot would l be very cheerful way for a blind man i to consider the situation.
 Our friends on the other side cer- 1 tainly have not got a monopoly on peace, Let us look a little at the rec { ord. They tell us they are so strong 1 " for the preservation of peace that anyone who criticises what they have done must be a militarist.
 ! ! maintain that the most import ant thing for the purpose of safe l guarding the peace of the land is 1 correct policies. That is important I in this hemisphere; that is articular- | " important in Latin America That was very important in Mexico. h. stead of having a policy of peace based upon correct attitude toward that unfortunate country, our admin lstration, this present administration, entered into policy of officious in termeddling with matters which did not concern it. and embroiled this country in actual war. That is the real fact of the case"
 MT Hughes reviewed the admnis- traton's policy with respect to Huerta. T stand here to say and 1 challenge contradiction, that the threat to make war upon that indiv- idual and to use whatever force was adequate to put him out of the gov ernment, which whether we recogniz- ed it or not, others had recognized was utterly indefensible in law or ir morals Mir. Hughes declared.
 Reverting to the tariff. he said: We must equip ourselves to take care of our own vital interests. We cant do that unless we faithfully , apply as wisely, as intelligently a' we know how, the doctrine of pro . tection of American enterprise anC
 interests We have had some sug-
 gestion on the other side of an ap preciation of this situation.
 They have not been very definit , about it; they have not told us eX
 actlv what they stand for. If the
 do not stand for a tariff for revenue
 only they do not stand for anythin . at all so far as I know in connectio with the tariff If they are not 10
 that principle. so far as the tariff tconcerne1, they are without principle 2 because they certainly have not de clared their faith in any other Drin
 ciple
 They have. however, told us tha g thev will give us a tariff commission D I sincerely believe that We shoul . have every possible aid to an under n standing If the facts affecting thes I serious problems. l do not beliei { ir going blind. l have not come q this place of candidacy. leaving tn e career of which I spoke. for the puI n pose of parcelling out special priv F. ileges at the expense ot the publ f welfare to any class or to any grCul s q want to see this difficult an Q important matter attended to VII ] inc utmost care and fairness a can be done if We get the facts th; apnlN to each situation; and D'
 ieve in a tariff commission; but
 is perfectly idle for anybody to ia
 to the American public as if tarl
 commission were a solution Of U :. tariff difficulties. Tariff comml sions don't legisiate.'