Corpus Christi caller and daily herald. [volume] (Corpus Christi, Tex.) 1911-1917, 1916-01-05
TIMON'S PLEA
IN ABATEMENT
WAS OYERRULED

conspiracy On o. abou, the Inns chars
"a in The Indictments
That enc aaid James ilipp in the
proceedings ~ said Grand Jun with
reference 10 ihw examination ~ me
said ~lfnsas Angel gnifsfffz iu said
Investigation before said Gfaue Jury
before ne return ~ ahi1 indictments.
enanaaa 500 coufraFefsleF win eaIA Nlt-
Nets Before ald Guei Jars 90 ISSUES
~ fafi in regard to tho nnfNaf With
which iiif defendant r Indicted. and.
Further. that the Witness. gHrn Col.
Ysn Ahn Whs aiso afterwards Jointly
'ndisfsd ii aatN cause Vlfh thls defend
ant NsH called heiore said granU
Jsft in fha ufrsrnra ~ slid ID Sta
flrc Bnd ihe members ~ ihe Grand
Inri nnd wise questioned Ulfh refer.
aurf 90 iuf affeuee chtfatd to have
been fDnuuiiieca b. thiH defendants. and
ihr liIffT jointly Indicted aith hifn
nrd SAID witness was confronted ir the
pfeasnta nf sad afand lufy witt ntld
~ WHcHne nnd rhnfsfd wifh having
participated 100 ssli alleged conspiracy
hnd sali ~ M4cuua. lu me presence
81 taif fnrH nnd ln ihr presence 10
alii GRAND lHiN dufiur aHoh InFeaf
40 Idtutlft mln Witness und then anu
fnfre fharetI hlm with hafm. bnru
present Hnl participating iu tho ALLIES
90 ennHpinrf COS ur Hhrni ihr uuD
fnarerl 300 the indictments, fhlt fhr
mld % NArpnr fHnf farther rau ln
Htld proceedings 0t aHld Grand Iufi
Win reference Go the etsmlnaiiun of
said witness iuun Galp4u. in thiH
d B
aall witness. inau cHisan. before Htll
Grand llfY ga nuefunnH or ficf ut
fesufd f0 iho offcnHr with pNiOh ula
defendant Wna ro Indicted hy $500
gfand iuft
Thn defendant fafthrr saSa thHt
IamrI iiirp und said ~ Marunr we're
neither said Inmrn Hlpu nnf % Aia
leAne woFr amuus ihr peraua authnr.
/ itrl oi permitted by tha Statutes tn Doc
pitHtui durine the uhinr ut fho rfi
muns bt ths brand luri triatne to tna
Indictments ln tnir eautD
Third
/ That one BE- ~ NDilH WHH slHu pfrHent
1urne ihr ,uAinF of .u.h Testimony
cod participated in che proceedings nf
said pfnnd lpry in ihis wise
That Ioa Coleman who WHH therD
I afior ,ndiotvd hy said Grand lufy lolnt.
los with ibis defendant u tho lndlcl
menta boz ihia cnuae. duflne ihs inVes-
! ufnlion % shil matiffs. nnd before tne
rotufu of sald indictments WAS csli.t
hs ihc government pa "a witness before
said Grand jury relative to snlA mli
' irtH and ln thr presence 0f Htid o. 10.
Hriir WOE questioned with reference
fa thr nfrouHs chtrsed 10 have hcou
committed by thiH defendant and thnsr
lfhereafter ioiniiy indicted With him
herein. and said % ~ seiie WAS hy
said Grand iuft permitted go. and ala
remain ln sAid Grand Iute runm durlnf
the entire time mid DOS Coleman Was
before mih Grand Iuri. aH Witness.
luHd wpH nfeaent n sad Grand .iur
recon- dnrluH thc asAmntsou az ssil
Witness hy said Grand Iury
That tniF defendant duos NOT know
fnl wliNt rurpaHe the said o. ~ sonr
wns permitted Go rrmaih m Hafn Grand
Ilup room during the talking of tho
Testimony of slid witness hnl chat
mid % NJ srllo wac permitted to roe
uain therein for sHme purpose known
it1 me government niono eud uuknowu
fn this defendant bat thHt tho presence
land participation of the said o. A.
settle Boz the nkmg oi such tosiimnnN
before said uuud lun waa unwar.
mutri ana unauthorized nt lnw and in
( ylulatiun ~ inc arhm ST ubls dcfcni
aHt ana that mid be NJ sdlo was not
70 member of said Grand Jury and wla
not ainuug ihe pvraeHH authorized or
permitted hy mw Go ho preaent 900 thc
t'lmnd Juis mom iutlnr ,hr takus of