The Birmingham age-herald., 1916-02-13

graph company vs. l.. L. Smith; 9l4, Western Union Telegraph company vs. W. B. Earnest; 926, J. H. Howton Ys
 Henry Mathias BPS. City of Birmingham vs. l.. D. Hawkins; 929, Mutual Loan society vs. C. R. Stowe 936, Mrs Willean
 Murphree vs. N. J. Hanson and wife; 937,
 Hershey Chocolate company vs. Joseph A. Yates ct al; 9i0 R. H. Carter ct al. Vs. l Mrs. Sol Shugarman; 941, J. c. Shepherd vs the Butcher Tool and Hardware com pany; 945, George w. Poe, Jr., vs. South
 ern Railway company; 951 Robert Nc Coy vs L. r. Prince; 955, J. T. Stokes l vs. W. c. Hinton 960. Louisville and Nashville Railroad company vs. k. N. | Lowell; 965, Manchester Saw Mills Co. VS A. l.. Arundel company; 9S9, LoulsVllle and Nashville Railroad company Ns' ] George Davis 991. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company Vs. Dalsey l | ipscomb; 9e2, John Colley vs. Atlanta Brewing and Ice company; 999, Southern Railway company vs. Louis NeSron' 1 9 John M. Morrison, ct al. vs C. ". Clark g. Birmingham, Ensley and Bes- l semer Railroad company vs. Oscar M. | Stagg; 9, Birmingham Southern Rall- road company vs. L. S. Stephens; lS, Blr- mingham Railway, Light and Tower company vs Jesse Vernon, pro ami; Zl, Greenwood cafe vs. J. T. Lovinggood; 2S' Miller Grain and Commission company vs. International S. F. No. Co.,; 70, John B. Reed vs. Bell Hammond; 26, Southern Railway company vs. E. U. Goggins; %, E. l.. Hurst vs. f1tz water Wheel company; 34, H. H. Goldstein, et al. vs Alex Nobles; 36, w. A. Plunkett vs E.. G. Dendy ct al; 8, city or Blr-
 mingham vs. Mrs. Harry Muller; Az Re public Iron and Steel company vs. J. T. Howard; 43. pr. D. F. Talley vs. James Howard Whitlock; A, A. T. Danfofth vs. Andrew N. McClendon; 45. Birmi1rS nam Railway Light and Power company vs. Mamie Cohll; 46, Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company fvs. Miss Ethel
 Gray; 1T, Birmingham Railway, Light
 and Power company vs. J. M. Sprague'
 54 R. V. Windham vs. G. R. Hydrlck; 64 Mrs. L. E. Buckelew vs. Lusk, ct aa'
 receivers, s. L. & S. F. R. R. Co.,; 65
 Elver L. Rice vs J. H. Beavers & Co.,
 G. Brookside-Pratt Mining company vs. John McAiister, ct al
 Seventh Division-2SS, Ragland Brick
 company vs. Jeff Bell etc.; 364 the state
 of Alabama vs. Western Union Telegraph company; 365 c. o. McGraw and C: E; Houston vs. W. l.. Little 37l, J. D. Hall and J. A. Croley vs. First Bank of Cross vile: 982. c. G. Kershaw vs. J. M. Me Kown: 3S3 c. w. Thrasher and d. Ii. Snead vs R. F. Nicely; 3SS, the Commer- cal Finance company Vs. Cooper Bros.' 3S9, Southern Railway company ys. Lora Rowe; 395, F.. T. Lamb, receiver Atlanta Birmingham and Atlantic Railroad com pany, vs. Mrs. M L. Roberts; 400 H. E. Martin vs. w. R. Walker 401, Louisville and Nashville Railroad company vs C.
 C. Martin.
 Eighth Division-342, w. NJ. Keller vs.
 Jones 6 Weeden; S4S. w. c. Wallace vs. A. J. Crosthwait; 366, A. J. Craven vs. H. c. Quillin; 367, Doran & Co. vs. H. F. Gilreath; 36S, E. Fl. Peck vs Tennie s. Lampkin, as administrix; 370 R. l.. Ward vs. Mrs M. H. Limblad; 379, Tennie $.
 Lampkin, administrative, vs. Fannie
 Rose: 378, Ed Hartsell vs. Curry Turner;
 3S2, F. T. Neey vs. E. D. Reynolds; SS3, J. w. Sewell vs. Lattie Sewell 3S6, D. c.
 Pinney vs. Studebaker Corporation of
 America; 391, J. R. N. Thompson vs. Strong, Bagley X Bagley; 4O6 T. T. Tenn
 pie vs. L. P. Dooley; AT, town of Albert
 vile vs. J. F. Hooper; APO, Louisville and
 Nashville Railroad company vs. Clayton
 Boggs; 421 Louisville and Nashville Rail-
 road company vs. Frank Rayburn, ad- ministrator.