Honolulu star-bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1912-2010, 1916-11-24
BY AUTHORITY
NOTICE

49,. NOTICE
PUBLIC HEARING. DECEMBER ;.
1916
PROPOSED MODIFICATION or M
PROEEMENI> or, SMITH STREET
BETWEEN QUEEN. AND BERE-
TANIA STREETS. IN HONOLULU.
TERRITORY OF HAWAII
To THE OWNERS, LESSEES, AND
OCCUPANTS OF LANDS ABUT-.
TING o.. SAID STREET PRO-
POSED TO BE ASSESSED FOR
THE IMPROVEMENT OF SAID
STREET, AND TO ALI. PERSONS
INTERESTED GENERALLY.
NOTICE Is HEREBY GIVEN that
in accordance with Resolution No. 632,
the Board of Supervisors Of the City
and County of Honolulu propose to.
modify the plan to improve Smith
street. in the District Of Honolulu
aforesaid, upon frontage basis.
l.. +. CHARACTER =" OF IMPROVE
r.. .. MENT AND MATERIALS
20. Grading. H." -.
l2l Setting lava rock clrbing
CD Constructing concrete cutters
80 inches wide.
"a Paving the entire Improvement
with 2-inch "Bitulithic" surfacmg on
a concrete base ). inches in thick
ness ..: 49,.
II. FRONTAGE TO BE ASSESSED
Sub-Dlstrict "a"
The entire frontage, both sides in
cluded, abutting upon Smith street
and between the mauka property line
of Queen street and TIE makai prop
erty line of Beretania street, eXclud-
ing the frontage Of the Dowsett Com
pany, Limited, constitutes Sub-District
"A, and is divided into zones for
assessment on graduated basis per
front foot for the cost Of acquiring
new land, as follows:
Zone I is made mp Of that frontage
in Snb-District "a lying between
Queen street and the points on the
property lines midway between King
and Hotel streets.
Zone % is made up of that frontage
in Sub-District "A" between the nor
therly boundary of Zone | and the
points in the property lines midway
between Hotel and Pauahi streets.
Zone III is made Up Of that frontage
constituting the balance of Sub
District "A" *.
Sub District 80"
The entire frontage. both sides IN
cluded, abutting upon Smith street be-
tween the mauSa property line of
Queen street and the makai property |
line of Beretalia street, constitutes |
B. to be further as
sessed on a uniform basis per front
foot for the general improvement, ex-
Gliding the cost of acquiring new land, |
and for new curbing where necessary.
III. ASSESSMENTS PROPOSED
Sub-District a.
The proportion of cost of acquiring |
new land for load extension to be
borne by abuti:ng property shall be
paid by assessments against the front
age in Sub-Distriet "A" as follows:
Zone |. The frontage in Zone l., sub
ject to assessment (being 1047.39 feet |
shall be assessed at the maximum rate
Of $652736 per front foot.
Zone 10. The frontage in Zone ii,
subject to assessment (being 5000
IT, shall be assessed at the maximum
rate of $5.12776 per front foot.
Zone Ill. The frontage in Zone III,
subject to assessment tbeing 1064.75
'eet) shall be assessed at the maxi
mum rate of $3.03066 per front foot
sub-District "6"
The cost of the general improve
nent,' excluding the cost of acquiring
new land and the cost of new curbing,
shall be paid bv an additional assess
nent against the frontage, both sides
included, in Sub-District "B" (being
1880 feet) at the maximum rate of
;S.44 per from. foot.
The cost of new curbing shall be
laid by a further assessment at the
maximum rate Of S0.45 per front foot
against abutting lands in front OF
which the same shall be laid.
Y. NEW LAND TO BE ACQUIRED.
New land to be acquired shall be
he same as heretofore advertised.
V. ESTIMATE OF COST.
ID The maximum estimate
of the entire cost of the i'm
provement, including ensi-
neering and incidentals. .$44 $3.50
% The maximum estimate
for new curbing ......... $500
- The maximum estimate
of general Improvement,
excluding cost of acquiring
new land ............... 24,U51.3o
AZ The maximum rate to
be assessed per front foot
for general improvement,
excluding cost of new land
is S.44
81 The maximum rate for
new curbing per front foot
is O.45
COST FOR ROAD EXTENSION.
81 Cost of acquiring new
land :. 1s,9S5.75
- Proportion of cost to be
borne by City and County,
80 1870 ............. 6,645.25
80 Proportion of cost to be