Norwich bulletin., 1916-06-14
AUTO CASE sTARTEp
 IN COMMON PLEAS.
Anthony suuadrIto Is sssklne s2so Damages As Result of Collision.


 The trial of the case of Anthony squadrito against Ralph Crumb for $200 damages as the result of an au- tomobile accident was started before Judge Charles B. Waller and jury in London, Tuesday The accident hap pened several weeks ago on the Noanly road near Ashby street
 The plaintiff alleges that he was driving his automobile toward ATys- tic when the defendant came along in his car from the opposite direction and collfded with him. He claims of the road and that Crumb had suf- that he was on the right hand side hcient room in the road but that he was driving his car recklessly and at that his machine was badly damaged and that he received personal injuries of a severe nature.
 D. D. Buck1in of Mystic a civil en- gineer, explained map of the road at the scene of the accident and gave testimony regarding the nature and eo1dition of the road. He was on the stand for considerable length of time.
 About fifteen witnesses were exaulin- ed before court adjourned for the day.
 On Monday cases were disposed of ss fellows:
 In the action of Charles W. Denison and others vs. Jessie A. Knapp an answer was ordered in two weeks. Answers in two weeks were ordered tropolitan Life Insurance company and Franciszka Tomasnewsld ys. Metro politan Life Insurance company. An answer by July was ordered in the case of Charles B. Warrington vs. city of Norwich.
 Ten days were allowed for an an- swer in the case of Kelly Springfield l Tire company vs. c. M. Shay F'ertf1i- ger company and judgment for the l sum of $102.93 was given in the case I of Richardson Manufacturing com I pany vs. Guy B. Clark
 The case of Frank B. Hyde, adm, vs. Charles s. Storms went off the list and the case of 1T. B. Lamb vs. 1 Clinton Gurnee and wife was contin- ued, as was the case of Motor Boat ing vs. M. A. Barber.
 The case of Alpheus N. Williams vs. David E. Doyle and others was I continued and the case of Kelly I Springfield Tire company vs. c. M Shay Fertilizer company went of the list.
 The case of Thames Loan and Trust company vs. Charles H. Roy and oth- CTS was continued.
 The case of William F. Bailey vs Herbert F. Howe will be tried in the court in Norwich on July l.
 The cases of Asahel R. DeWolf vs James D'Atrf and -Asahel R. DeWoli vs. Joseph Bonee will be tried to the court in New London on June r. The case of the Thames Square garage vs. Napoleon B. Lewis will be tried here on June 19. These jI7rv cases will be tried 1T New London.
 June 20--Albert W. Avery vs M. J liver, Bertha Rawlinson vs Harry Lester Lathrop, Edward Piontowsx vs. Anton Gromlzo and others, Ottt , Anderson vs. Mary A. Graham } These matters claimed for tria were continued: Aaron Frankel ant } others vs. Harry Millman, Philil l Hacker vss Harry Mil1man and others Z Russell Cook vs. Cyril Wakehe1d l The case of John w. Wilkinson vs estate of Kneeland Chapman and oth 5 CTS will be tried as the last case as signed for June 20.
 There were motions for substitution ] of administrator as defendant and fo a permissio nto file answer in the cas : of Reuben Lubchansky. vs. Frank E l Redden and the court received tn f papers.