The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1916-06-03
complaint dismissed as to appellants.

ScS SISIHn :, S,S.SrS q" order :: s Appellants.
Alexina c. <. Dowd. respondent. W..
s snms, E with hn sa. s 5SGginisn BY SsS ehsnsS!
lin; J.; 'cisrse; a. T. and Scott j. dis
MS %ssss. 4 4 G iSIvin; cc se'e sppsifsn;,. v" Ja rN:,
ment and order reversed with costs and
complaint dismissed with costs. Opinion
william KUHN. respondent. orders reversed
fTs motion grained and dsfsndanrs no.
ton denied with sio costs. with leave to
defendant to withdraw demurrer and TO
10y Mclaughlin, J. orders nled.
u: lsGGs Ieq1et 60 "pes, Dsn1.D Us B5Con,yn
I ia ana Wa Iau ,3,ni o55T,"''" i%.a ny sfa'' ana
scnhia 4 bonsher'y, respondent. ".
5 hiGriasT and p order a e' ned ~RF,S so,;:.
Charles Y. l. Johnston. respondent. Va.
IT, Is U1mstock q CO. appellant Juds.
Gigsspps ri ana Maria FIJI. appellants.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered
MN costs TO appellants 70 abide event.
,McLaughlin. J.. dissenting. Order nied.
dent. Nieo,s ]dSs . IN F FRAN; sei resgSa.
men, and order affirmed Nth costs 80
GSp .. d.en, in.'rke; order d ;! a,s ssd Mclaughlin
man Co. Impieaded. &c. sppellan,. Juds.
nent affirmed with costs. No opinion.
: The People. &c. appellant. vs. Eldon
hisnee' ,ssponien'' pc,srwins;iGn A.
lin. J. order nied.
cecella L. Kaiser, appellant. W New
spondent Judgment affirmed with costs.
NJ opinion. order fled
Ar kisnS Ia s sss.I' GG' D Eas.u'iion x:. d r.qi
ruled and judgment directed 30 be entered
on verdict opinion by Page. J. Settle
ras rsG99i'' a., Ts'DGnas1'' y: Mo,,!.
Jndsment affirmed. No opinion order
shanker Metal Ceiling Co, Inc. re.
Tespondents lmpieaded with samuel
kabinowitz ct al, appellants Judgment
filed
carlo Quasliot,a, respondent. vs. stand
ard Areh GO. appellant. judgment ~
rrmed with costs. No opinion. order
Alma Nahme. respondent. vs. Tn. City
order SfafineI Wiz eo.,s. on he au,hori;y
q WN'ism' y, CITY Of New ySIk. KS
York. decided by the cour; OF Appeals,
May ., 1915. order hled.
vs. Frank Hssb-ouck. supt. g.. respond
ont wei; dismissed and proceedings At
nfmei with $50 costs. No opinion. order
William p. Jenery. as trustee. SC re
snonden' vs. ArChi6aid SEWN. appeAsr,.
h~lrsemeEis, opinion by Page. J order
Hsrwood-Perley Mfg Co. appellant W.
! Charles Il. Virgins et al, Respondents
: Hrler attrmei with SO costs A. dis
/ ~bJrs"W"r's. No opinion. order hiei
tAFLNFtna InNp.. TsNnOnIent. y me
ehl order HtarmeI Si'n costs. No opin,
iawrenee son & G.rr,.h.. Inc. respond
en-. ~ The city OF New York. appellant
~, ordered with costs 10 appellant %
, ah!te event. opinion by Smith, j order
William L. Bruce; appellant. vs. GER
orter affirmed with costs. No opinion.
HeF,i.k g. c A r,,o T''Pa.ieg.: y' c Gen.
la. appellant Judgment ana order q.
armed with costs ~ opinion. order
Ned
Joseph f Corrisan. respondent. ", The
l1ri ORDER affirmed with 80 costs and
d'.hl-sements with leave TO appeIant to
men, 81 costs In mis- our, and In Ia"
court Below 80 opinion order hiei
L ~. ~. .,ge,a-: p,:erm.rs..c- -
n-mel with costs 80 opinion. orde-
Never Hlac,. an inf g. responder.
Judgment ait p-l"r Alarmed Win costs
~ op a.pr order f.ed
~A;r4rt u Z kert. r"-pondent. rs hrs-
'ro. Americana steamship Co. Lti ape
ian, DETERMINATION atnrmei with costs
No opinion. p,wlirg. j, dissenting and
- reIuee recovery 20 1919 40 with Interest
and costs. order dled
Harry ki,- respondent. " Richmond
Light $ IN 'u.. appellant Judgment
and order ~a,.vue. With costs No opiu-
Nbs;e. appellant Order modified as s'a,ei
ll o-Ie. ami u.s. modified affirmed WITH SO
costs and disbursements 20 respondent No
urt..Yu. order t.Ad.
jaime, !. e. Burke. respondent. " "a
weston. Houston : Heute-sor K II CO.
appellant brIHr AFFIRMED with so costs
aug Disbursements. opinion hy Page. ]
Ars. T. c,pe~ respondent v, wr,lsm
T. p". tppel''' order reversed ana
rp'.nu lesi.' N.'hou' prejudice - r.
'.sai 30 motion rpor proper papers. O9in-
i.I r. S.l''. . r~l,r tlet
"err'"s r C.trk'oa - ilJu'dntor 4
.,r' rri'- reversed With SO costs and
Ii~hIr-,WcrtS -uI motion granted. OpiH-
tom Ny SCOTT. j p-ier G.ed
Warren T. Thonrson. respondent. -
Amor. tr Optical 60. appellant, oder
-rr. r.'.t VIA go costs and GistUrssmer's
orl motto % denied opi1!on nv smith, J.
e. r--.p,ndea, - N'-s,nus - J M,yo'
appellant order noIiuei as indicated IN