The Washington herald., 1916-04-04
COURT PROCEEDINGS
Supreme Court of the United State.
MONDAY, APRIL 3, 1916.

tee McKenna, Mr.. Justice Holmes,
Mr.. Justice Hughes, Mr.. Justice Van
Deyanter. Mr.. Justice Pitney and Mr..
Justice McReynoIds.
Walter V. Hoagland, Of North Platte,
kebr.; B. E. Tatum, Of Chattanooga,
Tenn; J. Leicester watts, OF Rich
mond, Va; Joseph Madden, of Keene,
William ]. Mulligan, Of Hartford.
Conn., J. Grattan MacMahon, of
Brooklyn, n. Y; William Shannon
Nelson, OF Columbia. S. c.; Sam ].
Nichols, OF Spartanburg, s. c.; Ira A
Campbell, Of San Francisco, Cal; Ber-
nard J. Rillian, Of Boston. Mass; Louis
B. Williams, OF New York City; Will
liam W. Ritchin, OF Raleigh, n. c.;
Charles Toye, OF Boston, Mass; Sam
uel W. Foster, OF Philadelphia, Pa;
Herman s. Hertwig. OF New York
City; Cecil z. Heller, of NGreensburg,
Pa; George E. Barron, of Greensburg.
Pa; Stuart Chevalier, of Louisville,
Ky; Edward F. Mercy. of Paterson,
n. J.; Albert o. Miller, jr., of Passaic,
n. J.; William Harold Hitchcock. Of
Boston, Mass: John K English, Of
Elizabeth, N. j. Harold R. Waldo, of
Salt Lake City, Utah: Patrick H.
o'Donnell, of Chicago, Ill; Leon R.
Smith, Of Shreveport, La; Richard D.
Evans, OF Waco, Tex. and Thomas L
Jones Of Washington, D. c., were ad-
mitted to practice.
No. 2s4-G. F. Warner ct al, appel
lsnts, VS.. the New Hampshire Savings
Bank ct al
No. 265-The Haines Tile and Man
tel Company, appellant, VS.. the New
Hampshire Savings Bank ct al, and
No. 2ss-The Jackson-walker Coal
and Material Company, appellant VS..
the New Hampshire Savings Bank ct
al Appeals from the United States
Eighth circuit. DEGREES affirmed with
costs, and causes remanded to the
District Court OF the United States
for the District Of Kansas. Opinion
by Mr.. Justice McReynolds.
No. 2O1-Southern Express Com
pany. plaintiff in error, VS.. John
Byers. In error to the Supreme Court
Of the State Of North Carolina. Judg-
ment reversed with costs. and cause
remanded for further proceedings not
inconsistent with the opinion OF this
Reynolds. (Mr. Justice McKenna and
Mr.. Justice Holmes concur in the re-
suIt).
No. 1872. Central Trust Company Of IL
hnOts, trustee, etc, appellant, VS.. Chi
cagO Auditorium Association; and
No. ia Chicago Auditorium Associa-
ton, appellant, vs.. Central Trust Com
pany of Illinois, trustee, etc. Appeals
from the United States Circuit Court Of
Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Decree
in No. 162 affirmed with costs. Appeal
IN No. ia dismissed, and writ Of certio-
rart granted, and decree reversed with
costs, and remanded to the District
Court OF the United States for the North
ern District Of Illinois for further pro
ceedings in accordance with the opinion
Of this court Opinion by Mr.. Justice
Pitney.
No. 80. Herman H P1neI ct al, ap-
pellants, VS.. Thomas F. PineI ct al. Ap-
peal from the District Court Of the Unit
ed states for the Eastern District Of
Michigan. Decree affirmed with costs.
Opinion by Mr.. Justice Pitney.
No. IA Henry A. Uterhart ct al, ap-
pellants, vs.. the United States. Appeal
from the Court OF Claims. Judgment
reversed, and cause remanded with d.
recton to enter Judgment in favor Of
the appellants for the tax collected in
excess Of that amount upon the interests
Of the residuary legatees. Opinion by
Mr.. Justice Pitney. CMr Justice Nc
Reynolds took no part In the considera-
ton or decision of this case).
No. 62S. The United States Of America
plaintiff in error, VS.. Union Manufacture
trict Court Of the United States for the
Southern District OF Florida. Judgment
reversed, and cause remanded for fur
ther proceedings In accordance with the
opinion Of this court. Opinion by Mr.
Justice Pitney
No. $50. Jennie 4. wflink. executrfx,
etc, appellant VS.. the United States
Appeal from the Court Of Claims Judg-
ment affirmed. Opinion by Mr. Justice
Van Devanter. (Mr. Justice McReynolds
took no part in the consideration or de-
Cision Of this case.
No s.. Detroit & Maclzinac Railway
Company, PLAINTIFF in error, VS. Michigan
Railroad Commission ct al In error to
the Supreme Court Of the State Of Michf-
gan. Judgment affirmed with costs. Opin-
ion by Mr.. Justice Van Devanter. CMr
Justice MCReynolds is Of opinion that
the Judgment is not final within the
meaning OF section 81, Judicial Code,
and therefore that the writ of error
should be Dismissed.
No. 107. Frank G. Farnham, appellant,
VS.. the United States. Appeal from the
Court Of Claims. Judgment modified and
affirmed. Opinion by Mr.. Justice Hughes
IN the consideration or decision of this
easel
No. 49, Jones National Bank, plain
TIN in error, VS.. Charles E. Yates ct al +;
No. l64. Bank Of Staplehurst, plaintiff
In error, VS.. Charles E. Yates ct al;
No. 165. Utica Bank, plaintiff in error,
vs. Charles E. Yates ct al; and
No. 166-Thomas Bailey plaintiff In err
ror' ys. Charles E. Yates ct al In err
Tor to the Supreme Court Of the State
Of Nebraska. Judgments reversed with
costs, and causes remanded with in
structlons to reinstate the judgments en-
tered IN the District Court which are
affirmed Opinion by Mr.. justice Hughes.
No. 293. Carl L. Ackerlind, administra-
tor. etc, appellant, VS. the United States.
Appeal from the Court Of Claims. Judg-
ment reversed, and cause remanded for
further proceedings in conformity with
the opinion of this court Opinion by
Mr.. Justice Holmes. (Mr. Justice Mercy
nolds took no part in the consideration
or decision Of this COURT.
No. IS Armour & Company, plaintiff
IN error, vs. the State Of North Dakota.
In error to the Supreme Court Of the
State Of North Dakota Judgment af-
firmed with costs. Opinion by Mr.. Jus
tice McKenna-
No. S02. st. Louis, Iron Mountain &
Southern Railway Company, plaintiff in
error. VS.. the State Of Arkansas. Judg-
ment affirmed with costs. Opinion by
Mr.. Justice McKenna.
No. 2&-Indian Territory IIIurnfua ting