The Kansas City sun. (Kansas City, Mo.) 1908-1924, 1916-09-30
LESSON FOR OCTOBER |.
PLOT THAT L
LESSON %.

Atg bAAA hkAG
against thee; but they shall not prevail
against thee; for / am with thee. saith
Jehovah, to deliver thee.-Jer. 1:19.
The stirring events of this lesson oc-
Cured in the Castle Antonio and the
Sanhedrin hall, near the temple court
of Jerusalem also In Caesarea, the
Roman capital OF Judea, ON the Medi-
teranean coast, in the year A. d. 81,
just ut the close of Paul's third mis-
%sionary journey. The lesson pictures
two successive days Of strange adven-
lures in which Paul was concerned, a
narrow escape and the unexpected
p%rovidences used in his de~liverance.
The day was i%naugurated by Paul's
magic words 81 am a Roman citizen"
which caused the commander, Lyslas,
to release him from the threatened
scourging, Il made him more than
ordinarily careful in his treatment of
Paul.
/. Before the Elders wv. 1-12). By
referring back to chapter 81, V. 10, we
find the charge which really underlay
all of Paul's trouble, his preaching in
the name of the Lord Jesus. Paul's
defense is interesting. He gives us a
rehearsal of his Christian life, laying
emphasis upon its blamelessness and
he fact that he Is not an apostate
jew. The high priest speaks to silence
him, but not gently. Although Paul
for a moment seems to give way to his
~justifable indignation, he quickly re-
veals his reverence for the rulers of
4ha- a,-I- n A.. ls-s1-- II
hedrin. Read carefully chapter % 49,,
and compare with verses II and IS.
The sanhedrin could not explain this
testimony of Paul, and were seeking
to put aside the whole question. An
interesting discussion would be to con-
slider the insult to Paul. Was his in
dignation right and rightly expressedP
Another question, the matter of Paul's
apology. Just for what did he apollo
gize? Is it ever wrong to speak evil
of rulers? These were indeed days of
stress and storm. Was Paul justified
in dividing the sanhedrin in order to
conquer their opposition to him?
Again, how God used these incidents
in the furtherance of the Gospel s a
suggestive lesson for us all. 1t has
been limited that Ananias was not in
his priestly garments, and therefore
perhaps not readily recognized by
Paul. Paul may never have seen him.
as he was elected high priest after
Paul had left the council. 1t is inter-
esting to note that it is not said that
anyone struck Paul or that Paul did
not apologize for his words or deny
them to be true, but only for thelr be-
ing spoken to the high priest. Read
In this connection what Christ said to
the Pharisees (AIatt. % :27). Paul ap-
ologlzed because he had broken the
law found in Exodus % :2S. In the
trial of Christ one of the officers struck
Jesus with the palm of his hand,
whereupon Jesus answered him, say
ing: IF l have spoken evil, bear wit
ness of the evil, but If we'll, why smit-
est thou me?" On the other hand,
when Jesus was ill-treated by the COM
mon sOldires, he opened not his mouth.
Was Paul one "who was angry and
sinned not?" (See Eph. 1926. Our
danger Is not so much in the posses
sion of a temper. but in our lack of
controlling 1t.
II. The Plot and DeIiverance wv. 70
35). Paul's prospect was not a pleas
ant one. In his darkness God appeared
to his faithful servant to cheer him
". ~. Perhaps Paul was tempted to
think he had made a mistake in COM
ing to Jerusalem over the protests of
his friends, but evidently the Lord
heartily approved of his testimony
there. A dangerous conspiracy was
forming against him, but God was, as
he always is, beforehand with his COM
fort and preparation for the crisis. We
have often specialized as to what be-
came of the forty men who entered
into it (see V. 12)-whether they ac-
tually lived up to their oath. If they
did, they must have died of starvation.
They were determined men, willing to
go any length, and fancied they were
doing the will of God. There is no
more dangerous man than he who fan
cies that he must be the judge as to
who are Gods friends and who are his
foes, and that he is tn. appointed exc
cutioner of Gods judgment. The plot
was well laid, and seemed certain of
success, but it failed miserably. (See
Psalm 2:1-4; GA lilo; Isaiah Al :l0).
The wicked, who leave God out of
their plans, no matter how cunningly
| they plot, are doomed to failure (Rom.
| SID. These plotters co-operated with
the priest. Ecclesiastics have often
descended to the lowest villainy. Men
> are not murdered today, though their
: regulations are often blasted by un-
: principled and hellishly impelled pro-
} fessed followers of the lowly Naza-
. rene. Paul had friends in this city.
His nephew's discovery and revelation,
and the Gentle soldier, a colonel, eff
fered his d~eliverance. In the boys
heart there must have been great adj
miration for the uncle. 1t would be
well for teachers of boys to have them
repeat in their W language this boys
story. Paul was not safe in Jerusa-
lem. The Roman governor recognized
the nature of the conspiracy, and the
: desperate character of the Jewish ia
! nRtics, and therefore sent him under a
strong guard to Caesarea, which was
reached after a journew on horseback,
lasting through the night and the fol