The Washington times. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1902-1939, 1916-10-23

only ran well from position. but the de-
fensive playing OF Peter Wall. Jack Gil
roy, Mcouade. and Sullivan was highly
commendable. Wall, once of woburn
High and Tilton Seminary. was the big
feature in. the backfieid from q defen-
sive standpoint His vicious tackling.
nose for the ball. and ability to hold his
feet while carrying were easily fea-
lures.
"Dartmouth's ends were not UP to the
usual standard. Cusack at left end.
Alec Anderson. of Somerville: Frank
Green. of. Charlestown, at right guard.
and Larry Green. a Haverhill and Exc
ter product. played brilliantly for
Georgetown.
THE triumph Of Georgetown is fine
tribute to Coaches Exendine. John d.
O'Reilly and the large number OF New
England boys in the lineup. All but two
New England. eight hailing from Mas
sachusetts and one from the Granite
State.
out OF the lineup owing to an in
tured foot.
Arthur DuhameL. n Lawrence prod
uct, the regular fullback, did not get
into the game until toward tne emu
Trier. who started at left tackle.
played beautifully while he was In the
contest. Nicely. the one-arm player.
was well covered and did not get
as much of a chance to show as he
has in previous games
Dartmouth resorted to practically
old ia shioned football, with swinging
end runs and off-tackle plays, these
being her principal ground-gainers.
The reason for not opening up was
due. 1t is said. to the. presence of
Princeton and Syracuse scouts, whom
the Green eleven will meet on success
sive Saturdays. Dartmouth's execu-
| tion of the forward pass was poor.
"Georgetown's line held like a stone
wall with one exception in the third
period, when the Green eleven went
almost the entire length OF the field.
Whenever Dartr ,outh WIS at all dan
gerous. the Southern eleven's defensive
| frightened. The Green eleven found Cap
tain O'Connor and Mccarthy the sturdi-
est tackles that they have faced.
"Showalter and Frank Green showed
| and were replaced by Ward and San
chez. who held their own against their
! tired opponents. This change probably
saved the day for GEORGETOWN, for Gil
roy received an ugly kick In the mouth
shortly before that, being replaced by
Jim Sullivan.
Both McQuade and Wall either inter-
cepted or battered down forward passes
|
game. thus preventing long gains.
| Georgetown's execution of the forward
pass, especially in the opening period,
when two practically. gave II the only
touch tGuchdSw I OF the day. was nothing
Each pass was bluffed for an end
run. only to being thrown to the short
side OF the Dartmouth line with pre-
cision. OF the large number Of passes
Dartmouth attempted. only one really
resulted in a substantial gain, and that
happened In the third period, when Can
nell to Thielscher made twenty-four
yards"
Next Saturday Georgetown plays its
first real game at the Hilltop, facing
Albright, from Myerstown, Pa, one OF
the fastest of the smaller Pennsylvania
elevens. This game has been scheduled
| by the Blue and Gray athletic directors
to act as a training stunt before George
town goes to New York for the annual
battle with Fordham. 1t was expected
! that the Dartmouth game would take a
lot out OF the local squad and so a medi-
UNI strong opponent was chosen to fol-
low the clash at Haverhill.
! or course, the really big game OF the
week will be the big clash at Princeton.
when the sons OF New Hampshire tear
into the mazes of the jungle. Dartmouth
las won but once from Princeton since
1908. though losing some close contests.
and the Hanoverians are desperate. Fol-
lowing is the record Of these two teams
since 1897:
1S97-Princeton. 30; Dartmouth. 0.
l903-Princeton. II: Dartmouth, o.
l9O5-Dartmouth, 6; Princeton, 0.
19O6-Princeton. ~; Dartmouth, o.
l90S-Dartmouth.. TO- Princeton, 6.
19G9-Dartmouth, Q; Princeton. 6.
l9l0-Prlnceton, 6; Dartmouth, 0.
l9ll-Princeton, 81 Dartmouth, o.
Dl2-Princeton. %; Dartmouth, Z.
19l3-Dartmouth, 6; Princeton, o.
1H4-Prlnceton. 16; Dartmouth, r.
l9l5-Princeton, 30; Dartmouth, 7.
or these twelve contests Dartmouth
has won three, one was tie. and eight
went to the Tigers. Dartmouth has
many times gone into Princeton games
favorite, frequently with large odds,
| only to emerge at the little end OF the
| horn The Tigers appear a ink to the
Hanoverians, Fumbling. poor head
work, faults OF omission and commits
sion, and Injuries to valued players
Green.
Just how the game will result this
year remains to be seen, but Princeton
probably will be a favorte with the
lads who like to bet few or two or
three.
The success of Foster Sanford's So
called multiple kick" may cause other
coaches to use IT, BY means OF this
freak formation It is possible to drive
the ball seventy yards at a crack Thus
was Rutgers able to battle Washington
and Lee to tie.
Sanford places his fullback about ten
yards behind the line of scrimmage'
The halfbacks lie down on the ground
facing each other, The quarterbac ok
stands upright before them The center
passes the ball to the quarterback, who
gives 1t to the halfbacks. They hold II
in position for the kick. and the full
back boots II. Such a kick has all the
power OF a kickoff. and FOR placement