Honolulu star-bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1912-2010, 1916-12-20

STREET, IN HONOLULU, TERRI
! TORY OF HAWAII. <...:..
| TO THE OWNERS, LESSEES AM
I OCCUPANTS OF LANDS ABUT
TING ON SAID STREET PROPoS
| ED TO BE ASSESSED FOR TIKI
IMPROVEMENT OF SAID STREET
| AND TO ALL PERSONS INTER
| ESTED GENERALLY. j. -. !.
| NOTICE is HEREBY GIVEN that il
accordance with Resolution No. Ga,
and Resolution M. 654, the Board o
Supervisors of the City and County o
Honolulu propose to improve Hote
Street, in the District of Honolulu
aforesaid, upon a frontage basis.
l. CHARACTER OF IMPROVEMENT
Hotel Street shall be widened alonl
| the properties of John d. Detor ant
the Estate of James Campbell, be
tween Fort and Bethel Streets, in
Guiding a reconstruction Of all build
ings and other improvements, to con
form to a new street line which is
continuation of the present prop
c-ty line of Hotel Street at Bethej
Street @..~..
u. FRONTAGE TO BE ASSESSED
The entire frontage, both sides in
cluded, abutting on Hotel Street, to be
assessed for the said proposed i'm
provement begins at the southeasterly
property line of Nuuanu Avenue and
ends at the northwesterly property
line of Bishop Street, excluding the
frontages of John d. Deto- and the
Estate of James Campbell, and is
divided into zones for assessment on
a graduated basis per front foot, as
follows: ...:.. ~.
ZONE / is made up Of all that
f. ntage, both sides of Hotel Street
included, lying between Nuuanu Av.
enue and the southeasterly property
line of Bethel Street. ..=..., .
ZONE ii is made up of all that
frontage, both sides of Hotel Street
included, lying between the southeast
erly boundary of Zone and the north
westerly property line of Fort Street.
ZONE III is made up of all that
frontage, both sides of Hotel Street
included, lying between the southeast
erly boundary of Zone II and the
northwesterly property line Of Bishop
Street .s.-
IA. ASSESSMENTS PROPOSED.
The proportion of cost of acquiring
new land for road widening and for
incidentals to be borne by abutting
property shall be paid by assessments,
as follows:
ZONE I. The frontage in Zone l
subject to assessment (being 1855
feet) shall be assessed at the maxi
mum rate of $12.S2 per front foot.
ZONE II. The frontage in Zone IL
subject to assessment (being 1914
feet) shall be assessed at the maxi
mum rate of $52.62 per front foot.
ZONE III. The frontage in Zone III
subject to assessment (being SILT
feet) shall be assessed at the maxi
mum rate of $12.82 per front foot
w. NEW LAND TO BE ACQUIRED.
The following described land is re-
quired for widening Hotel Street:
Parcel (a)-John D. Detor.
Portion of L. c. A. 621.
Beginning at the east corner of this
piece, said point being the present
west corner of Fort and Hotel Streets,
the co-ordinates of which referred to
the Government Survey Triangulation
Station "Punchbowp are 1880 feet
south, and 4124.24 feet west, as shown
on Government Survey Map No. sos,
and running by true azimuths:
1. 500 S9'-13.20 feet along northwest
side of Fort Street;
2. 1862 22'-36.65 feet along new line;
8. 229o 14-13.50 feet along L. C. A.
621 to new line;
4. 1861 45'-37.01 feet along old line
to initial point
Area, 4S8 square feet.
Parcel (b)-James Campbell Estate.
Beginning at the east corner of this
piece, said point being by true All
muths and distance 1852 As 1901 feet
from present west corner of Hotel
and Fort Streets, the co-ordinates of
said point of beginning referred to
Government Survey Triangulation Sta
ton "Punchbowl." being S12.95 feet
south, and 4144.53 feet west, az shown
on Government Survey Registered
Map No. sos, and running By true All
muths:
/. 49, 1f-13.50 feet along L. C. A.
Ell to S. Reynolds;
2. 1862 22'-11200 feet along new line;
3. 233o 50'-13.90 feet; ~. H. 4
4. 325o 47'-33.04 feet along old line;
5. $50 1880 feet; ....:.
6. 326o 45'-77.90 feet along old line to
the initial point
Area 1884 square feet.
v. ESTIMATES OF COST.
a Cost of acquiring new
lduo 94V,uVV.VV
(2) Incidentals, Engineer
ing, etc. ............ 100000
Total cost of Improvement: SAL 100000
80 Proportion of cost to be T. =. -.~.
borne by the City and -< r
County, $50 of $40,- .>>.=
10000 100000
"a Proportion of cost to be =. -
assessed against abut-