Honolulu star-bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1912-2010, 1916-11-16
BY AUTHORITY
NOTICE
PUBLIC HEARING. DECEMBER -
...:. 1916 .:@."-:=.

i
~..:. 1916 ~. ..."-.* -
! PROPOSED MODIFICATION. OF fAf:
4 PRONEMENT OF SMITH STREET
| BETWEEN. +. QUEEN. AND BERE.
/ TANtA STREETS. IN HONQECT.U,
/ TERRITORY OF HAWAII "..-%
| To THE OWNERS, .LESSEES. AND
/ OCCUPANTS: OF LANDS >ABI:T.
TING OK, SAID STREET" PRO.
POSED TO. BE ASSESSED. FOR
/ THE IMPROVEMENT" OF: SAID
STREET. AND To ALI. PERSONS
INTERESTED GENERALLY. -. -.
F. NOTICE Is HEREBY GIVEN that
in accordance with Resolution No 632.
the Board of Supervisors OF the City
and County Of Honolulu propose to
| modify the plan 10 improve Smith
street. in the District Of Honolulu
aforesaid, upon aIfFontage basis. lin
l. CHARACTER or IMPROVE
MENT AND MATERIALS ~
(11 Grading !. =. .:"." -. III :.
t2) Setting lava rock curbing F.
80 Constructing concrete. cutters
50 inches wide. ~. =. ...... ".* -"
a. Paving the entire Improvement
with Pinch "Bitulithic" surfacing on
a concrete base inches in thick
ness. ".:.= -. IL. "
II. FRONTAGE TO. BE ASSESSED
Sub-District "A" - !.
The entire frontage both sides in
Guided, abutting upon Smith street
and between the mauka property line
of Queen street and tie makai prep
erty line of Beretania street, exClUd-
ing the frontage of the Dowsett Com
pany, Limited. constitutes Sub-District
A. and is divided into zones for
assessment on a graduated basis per
front foot for the cost of acquiring
new land, as follows; ~.
Zone ! is made up of that frontage
in Sub-District. IA lying between
Queen street and the points on the
property lines midway between King
and Hotel streets. >:"
Zone II is made up of that frontage
in Sub-District a" between the nor
therly boundary Of Zone and the
points in the property lines midway
between Hotel and Pauahi streets.
Zone lII is made Up of that frontage
constituting the balance of Sub
District "A" ri. -. -:.>..r
Sub District "B" -. r.. i
The entire frontage, both sides in
cluded, abutting upon Smith street be-
tween the mausa property line OF
Queen street and the makai property
line of Beretaaia street, constitutes
Sub-DistTict "B, to be further as-I
sessed on uniform basis per front
foot for the general improvement, ex-i
GLIDING the cost Of acquiring new land,
and for new curbing where necessary.
III. ASSESSMENTS PROPOSED
Sub-District "a" ~"
The proportion of cost of acquiring
new land for load extension to be-
borne by abutt:ng property shall be
paid by assessments against the front
age in Sub-District "A" as follows:
Zene I. The frontage in Zone /, sub
ject to assessment (being 10i739 feet
shall be assessed at the maximum rate
of $6.52736 per front foot. In
Zone III. The frontage in Zone II,
subject to assessment Cbeing 629.30
ft.) shall be assessed at the maximum
rate of SEPTIC per front foot
Zone H.. The frontage in Zone III,
subject to assessment (being 1064,75
feet snail be assessed at the maxi
mum rate of $3.03066 per front foot.
Sub-District "B" -:
The cost OF the general improve
ment, excluding the cost of acquiring
new land and the cost of new curbing,
shall be paid by an additional assess
h. hnL do.
included, in .Sub-District "B" (being
2S5S0 feet) at the maximum rate of
SS.44 per from. foot. 49,. -.
The cost of new curling shall be
paid by a further assessment at the
maximum rate Ct $045 per front foot
against AUDITING lands in front of
which the same shall be laid.
". NEW LAND TO BE ACQUIRED.
New land to be acquired shall be
the same as heretofore advertised.
Y. ESTIMATE OF COST
"a The maximum estimate -.
of the entire cost of the i'm
EroTement, including engi- ......
neering and incidentals. $44, $3.50
(2) The maximum estimate -
for new curbing - $4,000
go The maximum estimate ..
of general improvement, ~. 49,.
excluding cost of acquiring %:*
new land ~. 24,O52.35
a. The maximum rate to .". i
be assessed per front foot ~.
for general improvement, -. -.
excluding cost Of new land " "...:"
is ...:......... =: SAL
CO.. The maximum rate for r. -.
new curbing per front foot :..*.'
Is -. .. -. -. V:fo
COST. FOR ROAD EXTENSION:
16l Cost of acquiring new i. ~.
land ..:...... 49,. 19,335.I5
ca Proportion of cost to be !: =..... /
borne by CITY and County, - .:..:..