The Mankato free press. [volume] (Mankato, Blue Earth County, Minn.) 1879-1924, 1916-11-17
Plenty Of Work Tabled For the
Petit Jurors
TRIAL IS NOW BEGUN
County Ditch Proposition Will
Be Aired Beforel Twelve
Good Men
Ennm THURSDAYS Daily.

today occupied with the trial OF
three suits over County Ditch No. -,
located between Mankato anu 81
Clair in Mankato township. Ihe
suits are brought by Edgar Z. Jen-
sen. Frank Reinhart and Mankato
township, over questions OF the
amount of benefits and damages. Y.
7. Laurisch is attorney for all OF the
demandants, and ]. w. Schm1tt tor
the county and the petitioners, Mich
ael Huebl and others.
To Be Tried BY Jury.
At the present session of the Blue
Earth county district court the fol-
lowing cases are for trial by jury:
George w. Allyn VS.. Minneapolis,
St. Paul, Rochester and Dubuque
Electric Traction company.
The Bearman Fruit company VS..
d. F. Mertens.
w D. Lowell VS.. village of st.
Clair.
August F. Blume VS.. Chicago, Mil>
waukee & ST. Paul Railway.
Theodore Thompson VS.. Martin
Wiltgen.
Louis Janda VS.. w. M. Standish.
Daniel l.. Williams VS.. Robert
ZimmerT an.
Albert Schwake and Albert Kram-
CT VS.. F. T. Miller.
Henry Pagel VS.. Isaac A. Lownes.
Ida NJ. Briggs VS.. Leroy Keene.
James N. Mccarthy VS.. F. Desor-
moux and Joseph Nero, doing bust
ness under the firm name of f. De-
sormouX Construction company.
Aemil Nienow VS.. village of Maple
ton.
F. w. Dietz VS.. Daniel L. Williams.
Marie E. Ham VS.. c l.. Oleson.
F. B. Clements, doing business un-
der the firm name of Clements Auto
company VS., Chicago & Northwest
ern railway.
R. c. Turner VS.. Western Union
Telegraph company.
Henry Heidwinkel VS.. Chicago &
Northwestern railway.
Albert Hagermann VS.. L. A. VIII
fert.
A. NJ. Felmlee VS.. Chicago & North
western Railway company and Chi
cago, ST. Paul, Minneapolis and ANA
ha Railway.
f. Kelly VS.. Chicago and North
western and Omaha Railway COM
panies.
F. H. Barnes and L. A. Cox VS..
Chicago and Northwestern Railway
company and Chicago, ST. Paul, Min
neapolis and Omaha Railway.
Thomas Rooney VS.. Chicago &
Northwestern and Omaha Railway
company.
Henry Kraus VS.. Chicago e North
western Railway and Chicago, St.
Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha Rail-
way company.
Carl Ostreich VS.. Chicago, st. Paul,
Minneapolis and Omaha Railway
company.
The First National bank of Man
kato vs. o. w. Walker.
E. A Francis VS.. A. M. Miller.
Henry Dunkelbeck VS.. William
Lorenz Mayer VS.. Mayer Brothers
company. IL
Robert H. Monahan and Elizabeth
Monahan VS.. B. E. Smith.
In the matter of Judicial Ditch
No. II, Faribault county, MINI. De-
mand for jury trial by Theodore
Schatz.
Thresa Potz VS.. Chicarmaker In
ternational Union of America.
j. W. Heritage VS.. George F. Collier.
Bert Reintzes VS.. Minneapolis, st.
Paul, Rochester & Dubuque Electric
Traction company.
W. E. Stewart VS.. Mankato Elec-
trio Traction company.
J. E. Kriel vs.. Chicago & North
western Railway company.
c. B. Wilkes VS.. Carl Born.
Schimmel & Company VS.. Joseph
G. Friedrichs and John E. Regain.
Oma L. Walker VS.. Chicago, st.
Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway
company.
c. o. Kalman & Company VS.. Jo-
seph Sampson.
Morris & Andrist and L. w. Andrist
and S. M. Morris.
R. F. Storrs VS.. Harry Brush, A.
G. Marshall and ]. H. Holbrook
w. j. Smith VS.. City Bottling
Works.
w. ]. Smith VS.. City Bottling
Works.
o. A. Thro VS.. Fred M. Otto.
George w. Scherer VS.. Chicago, st.
Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway
company.
Eugene Coy VS.. Glenn Dixon.
Florence Kirchner VS.. Daniel H.
Oxrieder.
Leo Honetschlager VS.. F. A. Wit
trock.
Hannah & Hogg VS.. C.. o. Hall,
Henry T. Schabl, garinshee.
Hannah Retzloff VS.. G.. E.. Gilbert
son and Mass. Bonding and Insurance
company.
Otto Coke vs. G. E. Gilbertson and
Mass. Bonding and Insurance COM
pany.
Peter F. Fay VS.. Cornelius v.
Johnson.
]. A. Hielscher vs. Sivert Olson
The county of Freedom VS.. F.
Desermoux and Joseph Nero, CO.
partners under the firm name and
style of F. Desermoux Construction
company and National Surety COM
pany.
In the matter of the estate of
Louise Kiffe, deceased. Gertrude
Kiffe, claimant VS.. Joseph F. Kiffe.
In the matter of the estate of