The Washington herald., 1916-04-07
Circuit Division. Ne. 1.
Jusffre Gould.

Brown VS.. Goldenberg; certified tc
Circuit Division No. 2; plaintiffs at
torney, c. II. Merillat and A II. Bell;
DEFENDANTS attorney, T. ]. Hogan
American Laundry and Machinery Com
pany VS.. Perskin ct al; Judgment for
plaintiff for possession Of property re-
pleyied with costs; plaintiffs attorney
H. W. Wheatley.
Upperman, administrator VS.. Washing
tion Railway and Electric Company;
jury respited; plaintiffs attorneys, A. 1.
Newmyer and Lyon & Lyon. defen-
dant's attorney John 8. Barbour.
Norwood surviving executor vs. John
son ct al; order making heirs at law
Of defendants; J.Archer Lewis and George
W. Tancil deceased, parties defendant;
and writ Of scire facias to issue; plain
tins attorneys, W. H. Richards, and M.
n. Richardson; defendants attorney,
John Ridout
Assignment today:
Ss-Roth VS.. Love; attorneys, Carmody,
Mather-Newmyer.
d5-Burke VS.. Anacostia and Potomac
Railway Company; attorneys, Lambert,
Recommendations.
S2S-Calvert, administrator, VS.. Ternni-
nal Taxicab Company; attorneys, Git
dngs & Chamberlin, Mattingiy-Baker,
Osterman.
S2s-sommerviIle VS.. Mckinley; attor-
neys, Imlay-O'Donoghue
SS-Morgan VS. Capital Traction Co
attorneys, Topper & Gusack-Hogan,
SSI-Dean VS.. Washington Gas Light
Company; attorneys, Robinson-Berry a
Minor.
S5s-Rose VS.. Washington and South.
ern Bank; attorneys, David-caIhoun
Carter.
3ST-wedderburn VS.. Moses; attorneys
Gles-Ells & Donaldson
SoVHenderson W Mann; attorneys,
Hill, Jr-Sullivan
Sn-Jewett VS.. Moses ct al; attorneys,
Gardiner, Hamby-McNeilL
Motions for today at lis D. m:
t-toster vs.. Washington Railway and
Electric Company; attorneys, King
Wells, Bowen.
2-wright VS.. Globe Furniture Com
peny; attorneys. David-SwingIe and
Swlngle
IHawken w. Brown; attorneys, RIdout
+Davison vs. Richards: attorneys,
Lambert and Yeatman.
murphy vs.. Wolf; attorneys, Colbert
e-Krebs vs.. MacMurray; attorneys.
Moulton Milan-wheatley.
merrill VS.. Portland Apartment
Hotel Company; attorneys, Goodwin,
hey ySsr-hAmllton & Hamilton.
S-Hemler VS.. Potomac Electric Power
Company; attorneys, Gardener, Hamby-
Barbour, Williams.
eBrown vs.. Provident Relief Associa-
ton; attorneys, Kuntz-Bramhau.
lO-Gattts VS.. Lewis; attorneys, She'll
man, Hodges-Jones, Frisby.
n-Porter vs. Potomac Electric Power
Company: attorneys, Newmyer-Barbour
l2-Fstter vs. Fetter; attorneys, Davis,
Lewis-Lambert
Brock Creek Corporation VS.. Larnson
attorneys, Hinton, Hudson-Gies.
lETotteni VS.. Potomac Electric Power
Company; attorneys, Ralston & Richard
son, WiIlis-Barbour.
1-Shaner vs.. Potomac Electric Power
Company; attorneys, Ralston & Richard
son, Willis-Barbour.
B-Dugdale vs.. Bowman; attorneys, NJ.
Mahon, Ridout-Swindell, Van Fleet.
T-Beeler VS.. Bowman; attorneys JEFF
fords-Swindell.
B-Schenck vs.. District of Columbia:
attorneys, Newmyer-Syme.
l9-Wilson VS.. Boyd; attorneys. Rhodes
Cromelin-Ottenberg.
D-Sarp VS.. Fries Beall & Sharp
Company; attorneys, Brandenburg-Bar-
nard, Darlington.
H-Woodward VS.. Hekimian; attorneys,
Easily
2-Pnnce VS.. Washington Terminal
Company ct al; attorneys, Sullivan
Hamilton & Hamilton, McKenney &
Flannery.
2s-Tait VS.. District of Columbia; at.
torneys, Ridout-Williams.