The Mankato free press. [volume] (Mankato, Blue Earth County, Minn.) 1879-1924, 1916-02-04
Puzzled An Attorney
Continued from Page One.

plaintiff sues for $4,000. charging
Mrs. Cook with having alienated the
affections of his former wife, from
whom he was divorced two years ago
Mr. Butterworth's anger over the re-
fusal on the part of Mr. Laurisch to
grant a continuance was probably not
in the least allayed by the recollec-
ton that it was this same c. j.
Laurisch who pushed against him in
the divorce suit and won it, with sub
stantial alimony.
Action Became No. 1.
The result of il all was that this
latest action became No. l on the
calendar, and was set to be tried be-
fore a jury this morning. The at
torneys for Mr. Butterworth are Bull
lis. Frundt & Morse of Blue Earth
and Kenyon, Kelliher & C'Connor OF
Fort Dodge. A. R. Pfau, Jr. and c. j.
Laurisch are handling the case for
Mrs. Cook.
At the peremptory call of the
calendar yesterday afternoon other
jury cases were set to follow the
above in the following order
c. c. Bruske and F. H. Bruske, CO.
partners as c. Bruske & Son, VS..
August Weigelt
Marie z. Hahn vs. National Bank of
Commerce and C. j. Oleson.
George Averill, administrator, VS..
Henry C. Kraus ct al,
Fullerton Lumber company VS..
Daniel L. Williams.
E. Dagen VS.. w. ]. Sharp.
Of al
Mankato, Mimi, vs.. George Tolan,
Mat Michels and August Olson, as
sheriff of Nicollet county.
Hennepin Brewing company VS.. A.
j. Lippert and Frank E. Hide.
John Reopen, Jr., and Philip La
Due VS.. Consumers Power company
Blaine Shultis and Walter Shultis
VS.. A R. Wilder.
The First National Bank of Man
kato, Mimi, VS.. l.. l.. Beise and Ed
F. Hubmer.
ASA w. Biggerstaff VS.. Ira Bishop.
Della A. Hemingway VS.. Common
wealth Power company.
Edward R. Godfrey VS.. Martin
Looming.
c. C. Harris VS.. Albert Spencer and
A. NJ. Spencer.
F. w. Dietz VS.. Daniel d. Will
liams.
Fred Brandt VS.. James Mape
Martin Wiltgen VS.. Sam Kaps and
Jerry Kalos.
F. B. Clements VS.. D. L. Will
liams.
w. G. Hoerr VS.. C. o. Hall.
J. T. Leo Hardware company, and
w. B. Leo VS.. w. w. Clements and
F. B. Clements.
Martha H. Wilhelm VS.. William E.
Sulflow, Mathilda A. Verhoeff and
Union Investment company.
Crane & Ordway company VS.. F.
B. Clements, doing business as
Clements Auto company.
Carl NJ Beelman VS.. J. F. Russell
and T. P. Russell.
Nellie E. Beelman VS.. J. F. Russell
and T. P. Russell.
Henry Jamison VS.. George Lang.
H. G. Burchard VS.. John Lentz
C. o. Daley VS.. Alice M. Morse,
Daniel l.. Morse and Robert D. Morse.
c. A. Newell and E. S. Johnson
VS.. Sarah Butler.
George w. Allyn VS.. Minneapolis,
St. Paul, Rochester & Dubuque
Electric Traction company.
B. F. Herrley VS. Anna Herrley
Edith Herrley and B. G. Herrley.
The Bearman Fruit company VS..
L. F. Merterns.
The Adder Machine company VS..
Henry Madison
First National Bank of Canton, S.
D., VS.. Ernest j. Schmitt.
Andrew B. Stain VS.. Matt Arduser.
L. l.. Beise VS.. Ed F. Hubmer.
]. B. Richards and D. Richards,
partnership doing business under
the firm name and style of j. B. &
D. Richards, VS.. w. w. Eberhart.
Richard l.. Houk VS.. Hubbard Mill
ing company a corporation.
U. G. Argetsinger VS.. E. F. Hub
mer.
The First National Bank of Maple
ton. VS.. James Sharp
Mapleton State Bank VS.. Herbert
E. Dawson.
The Farmers National Bank of
Minnesota Lake VS. Herbert F.. Daw-
son and Clarence H. Dawson.
@hopAClOu OldlC vs..
H Dawson and Mearl NJ Dawson.
Charles F. Rhoades VS.. Nicholas
Schneider
w. D. Lowell VS.. Village of ST.
Clair.
George Pond, Josephine Pond,
Walter Daniels and Nellie Daniels
VS.. ]. T. Dolan.
Tena Mayer VS.. Clara Stahl.
l.. P. Kaufman VS. Henry A.
Long.
John H. Hughes VS. AmeI T. Carl
son.
Newell Nelson VS.. Chicago, st. Paul
Minneapolis & Omaha Railway COM
pany and C. Lundquist
The First National Bank of Man
kato VS.. Joseph Sampson.
Esther Stacker VS.. Carrie John
son.
The suit of Fred A. Moehlenbrock.
as administrator of the estate of Al
bert R. Moehlenbrock, VS.. Parke,
Davis & Co., John P. Rosenwald and
Roy N. Andrews.
Case Was Dismissed.
On the motion of Attorney C. o.
Daley, who appeared in the district
court this morning on behalf of o. E.
Butterworth of Elmore, the latter's