The Manchester journal. [volume] (Manchester, Vt.) 1861-current, 1916-05-11
ORDER OF PUBLICATION
No. 1884

JOHN HALL WATSON and
MARIE LOUISE II. WATSON
In the Court of Chanccry in said
County.
! whereas. John H. Dimond Of Man
chester, IN the County of Remington.
state OF Vermont, has filed his bin AZ
complaint in the Court of Chanccry
within and for the County of Rcnning-
ton, against John Hall Watson and
Marie Louise H. Watson, formerly 81
Manchester, in said County, and now
as the complainant is Informed and
believes, the said John Hall Watson
resides IN England, and the said Marie
Louise II. Watson in the City, County
and State Of New York. therein set
ting forth
That on the fifth day Of August.
1903, the said John Hall Watson was
indebted TO Edmond L. Wyman in the
sum Of Three Hundred Scventy-five
dollars, specified in one promissory
note of that date, payable two months
after date TO the order of the said
Edmond J., Wyman with interest an
Further setting forth that in order
to secure payment of said note the
said John Hall Watson and Marie
Louise II. Watson by their mortgage
deed of that date, by them duly exc
cuted, acknowledged and recorded, did
convey TO the said Edmond l.. Wyman
the following described lands and
premises situated in the town of Man
chester, Bennington County, State Of
Vermont, viz.
Being the same lands and promises
conveyed to Lezem Bovey by Jerome
Gleason and wife by warranty deed.
dated July 18th, 1901, recorded in Vol.
"a. Page 1856, of the Land Records Of
said Manchester; reference being had
to said deed and the deeds therein re-
ferred to, and the Land Records afore-
said, for more particular description
of said land and premises; and the
said premises have this day been deed
ed to the said John Hall Watson by
Lezem Bovcy and wife" Upon condi-
ton that if the said note should not
be paid according to its tenor. that
the buildings on said premises should
be kept insured for the benefit Of the
and that failing so TO do
the mortgage might procure insur-
ance therefor and add its cost to the
mortgage debt;
Further setting forth that said note
and large amount Of unpaid interest
thereon are due and unpaid. and that
The mortgage or the complainant in
this cause has caused such insurance
on said building to be placed at large
expense and cost to himself:
Further setting forth that said
mortgage and the note thereby secur-
I'd were duly assigned and transferred
% the said complainant on the second
lay Of April, 1915. for n valuable con-
'ideration and that this complainant
.hereupon became and still is the law
'ul owner and holder Of said mortgage
Iced and note; and that of such
and transfer the said John
Tall Watson and Marie Louise II.
Watson then and there had notice, and
,ayment Of said note was thercupon
Of said John Hall Watson
" this complainant:
Further setting forth that the said
Ohm Hall Watson and Marie Louise
/. Watson were at the time Of the
Xccution Of said mortgage deed hus-
and and wife but that since the date
f execution Of said mortgage they,
he said John Hall Watson and Marie
.ouisc IT, Watson. have been legally
eparated by a divorce granted to
and that they are
0 longer husband and wife and that
he said Marie Louise " Watson has
0 interest whatever in said mortgag-
! premises,
And praying that said defendants
lay be decreed TO pay to the Clerk Of
MS Court, for the benefit Of the COM
lainant, the sums due and to become
ne on said note and also whatever
nm or sums he has been compelled TO
ay by way Of insurance premiums up
4 the insurance policies issued upon
le buildings on said described lands,
Dgether with the costs Of this action,
Y short day TO be fixed by this Hon
'able Court, and in default thereof
lat the said defendants and all per-
ms claiming under them or either Of
lem, shall be forever foreclosed Of all
iulty vi itutIlpIlOH III TIE pTtlllstSg
I'D that the orator may have a writ
possession of said premises; that
le orator may be further relieved
'ording to equity; and that a writ of
lbpoena be granted unto the orator,
rected TO the said defendants, the
i'd John Hall Watson and Marie
)uise H. Watson, commanding them
appear before the Court Of Chanc-
y to be held at Manchester, within
ID for the County Of Bennington, on
e first Tuesday Of June, 1916.
And il appearing that the said John
all Watson and Marie Louise II.
atson are without the State Of Yer.
ont, SO that said bill Of complaint
d subpoena cannot be served upon
EN- personally:
IT IS THEREUPON ORDERED
at they be required 10 appear on the
st day Of the next Term Of said
urt Of Chanccry, to be held in Man
ester, in said County Of BcnninR-
y, on the first Tuesday Of June, 1916,
d also that they be ordered and re-
ired to cause their appearance
arein TO be entered with the Clerk Of
ID Court on or before the expiration
forty-two days from the date Of
d bin Of complaint, then and there
make answer thereto, otherwise