Arizona republican., 1916-04-06
.|NF FACE IF ADVERSE RULINGS,
 ZIMMERMAN GIVES UP WITNESS

laged to have been made by Captain GullcY. After this had been done, Lieutenant Colonel Donkersev pro- duced d list of written questions and proceeded to ply the witness with them. Holiday stuck to his conten- i tions of the previous day, and em phatically denied that the stories had no grounds. He explained that his sources of information could not be namcd and that it was necessary in the article tc have some one stand sponsor for some of the statements. He explained that he had told Gulley what information regarding Harris he had, and asked Gulley if he could use ais name. Gullev aSSenting. the state ncnts in The Republican were then Ia d at his door When asked if Gulley had given him d direct statement Hoi- lidaN stated that he had asked Gulley for q written settlement, but that the captain Lad refused it, in difference to Colonel Harris.
 The question of the authenticity of the article was raised, and in answer to ;t question as to whether or not he i had corrohorated his acts prior to ' meeting Gulley, the witness said. ''Fmphaticaily yes; l had confirmed my story by several sources before it 1 was published"
 1 Captain Robson. who had remained luiet until that period. then demanded to know who the sources were. Al- ! though Holiday did not refuse to tell. he hesitated. giving counsel for the defense an opportunity to object. Zim me,man objected. stating that the question of d newspaper man divulg- ing his sources of information had been threshcd out the day before, and it had heen decided that it was not necessary The court finally. after considerable deliboration. decided that the witness need not answer.
 Did you get any part of your infor- mation from members of the guard or officers ." was then asked.
 Y have never mentioned the word officer since I have been on he stanG.' was the answer. T may have talked 70 some of the members of the guard not knowing that they belonged to the organization
 4it' tenant tfolZWoTttl dSkcU that part cf lIollidar's evidence of the pre- vious day be stricken from the record and in It's place a copy of the article referred to bn substituted The court allowed this in spite of strenuous ob- ioctiors by Zimmerman. It was at this iunrturo that Captain Brown made his excited statement that he didn't care q hang for legal procedure
 Lieutenant Zimmerman protested tc the best of his ability when the prose cution insisted upon introducing as evidence a copy of what was claimed te he q copy of Gullcy's testimony be- fore board of inquiry held in Phoe- nix January 1. The copy was sealed and certified bv the adiut1n: general but the defense insisted that it should rot nc made 2 part of the record. Ma . ior Grnstead suggested that as long as the original was in Harris office it could be produced Tn order to thresh the matter cut the court went into eX- ccutivc session and decided to allow it . ls clidence.
 Adiutant General Harris, about < whom all the trouble has been stirred ID. was then called by the prosecu- ton. Colonel Harris was asked to tel about an alleged interview over the phone With F'ranl; Smith, T member ol o Company F. who called him up ano
 told him of what he termed q mass meeting at the armorN' at which Gull ley was haranguing the members ot Company A. and telling them that the < Ena ssicncd officers would be replaced f and that if the men would stick witt [ Tim he would be placed back in com = mand Harris stated that he tolt Smith t" get q copy of Gulley's al- = leeed statements and bring it out t
 his office. This smith did
 sergeant Duncan, of Company \
 was next called to the stand and tes-
 tilted that Gullcy had never given hin
 any orders about disseminating com ' panv drills while he was OF the un- assigned list In fact. Duncan saio
 that he uiG net know that Gulley wa: retired until some ore told him on tho street about it. After ,Duncan's res
 limpny court was adjourned until
 o'clock in the afternoon
 The Afternoon Session
 Former Sergeant Michael solomon
 of Company \ Was the first witness
 callcG in the afternoon session. H. i was asked if dt the time the first fou l men were sent to Clifton if he was a
 'ne armory He stated that he was ] He was then asked if the armory 0 1 lockers were broken into. He denict | that the building had been opene.
 forcihlV. but did state that the ''fielf | desk had been opened hy prNing of
 the lpck Eo was asked if he had key
 to the company room. and he answered
 in the affirmative.
 Who gave you the keys?' was thu
 next question.
 "I don't remember" was the answer
 He could not tell the date upon Whicl 1 the detail was sent to Clifton. anC
 when Zimmerman insisted that he ;n
 answer more specifically ill spite 0 l Hrlzworths objections. the court de
 cidcd to sustain Holzworth. At th
 iuncture Zimmerman threw up hi
 hands and uuit trying to ask ques
 tions in face cf the continued adVerS | rulings from the court.
 After Solomon had been diSmSse,
 Zimmerman announced that before h l Jo