Honolulu star-bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1912-2010, 1916-11-18
BY AUTHORITY
hN-INr
PUBLIC HEARING. DECEMBER 5.
1916 =. d..

PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF M
PROvEMEN1'~ OF SMITH STREET
BETWEEN QUEEN. AND BERE-
TANIA STREETS. IN HONOLULU,
TERRITORY OF HAWAII. II. ~.
TO THE OWNERS, LESSEES, AND
OCCUPANTS OF LANDS ABUT-
TING ON SAID STREET PRO-
POSED TO BE ASSESSED FOR
THE IMPROVEMENT OF SAID
STREET, AND TO ALL PERSONS
INTERESTED GENERALLY. ....
NOTICE is HEREBY GIVEN that
in accordance with Resolution No. 632,
the Board OF Supervisors of the City
and County of Honolulu propose to
modify the plan TO improve Smith
street, in the District OF Honolulu
aforesaid. upon frontage basis.
/. CHARACTER OF IMPROVE
MENT AND MATERIALS i.
% Grading. .s...:
(2) Setting lava rock curbing
go Constructing concrete cutters
80 inches wide. @~> -. -:.>::. ..-<.
(4) Paving the entire improvement
with Pinch ''Bitulithic" surfacing on
a concrete base 5 inches in thick
ness. ..: ..
II. FRONTAGE TO BE ASSESSED
Sub-District "A"
The entire frontage, both sides in
cluded, abutting upon Smith street
and between the mauka property line
of Queen street and tie makai prop
erty line of Beretania street, exclud-
ing the frontage of the Dowsett Com
pany, Limited, constitutes Sub-District
"A" and is divided into zones for
assessment on graduated basis per
front foot for the cost of acquiring
new land, as follows:
Zone | is made up of that frontage
in Sub-District "A" lying between
Queen street and the points on the
property lines midway between King
and Hotel streets. ~"
Zone u is made up of that frontage
in Sub-District "A between the nor
therly boundary of Zone l and the
points in the property lines midway
between Hotel and Pauahi streets.
Zone III is made Up of that frontage
constituting the balance of Sub
District "a"
Sub District "B"
The entire frontage, both sides IN
cluded, abutting upon Smith street be-
tween the mauSa property line Of
Queen street and the makai property |
line of Beretania street, constitutes |
3D. to be further as
sessed on a uniform basis per front |
foot for the general improvement, eX-
GLIDING the cost Of acquiring new land,
and for new curbing where necessary.
III. ASSESSMENTS PROPOSED /
Sub-Distriet "A"
The proportion of cost of acquiring
new land for road extension to be
borne by abuti:ng property shall be
paid by assessments against the front
age in Sub-District 'tA' as follows:
Zone !. The frontage in Zone 1, sub.
Jet to assessment being 104739 feet
shall be assessed at the maximum rate
Of $6.52736 per front foot.
Zone II. The frontage in Zone II,
subject to assessment (being $3.50
IT, shall be assessed at the maximum
rate of $5.12776 per front foot.
Zone lII. The frontage in Zone III,
subject to assessment (being 1064.75
'eet) shall be assessed at the maxi
mum rate of $3.03066 per front foot.
Sub-District "B"
The cost of the general improve
nent, excluding the cost Of acquiring
lew land and the cost of new curbing,
shall be paid by an additional assess
hn TO
included, in Sub-District "B" (befng
1880 feet) at the maximum rate OF
S8.44 per from. foot.
The cost of new curbing shall be
paid by further assessment at the
maximum rate CT $0.45 per front foot
against AUDITING lands in front of
Which the same shall be laid.
". NEW LAND TO BE ACQUIRED.
New land to be acquired shall be
he same as heretofore advertised.
V. ESTIMATE OF COST.
- The maximum estimate
of the entire cost of the i'm
rrovement, including engi-
neering and incidentals $44 $3.50
~ The maximum estimate
for new curbing ........ $4,000
- The maximum estimate
OF general improvement,
excluding cost of acquiring
new, land .............. 24,053S5
"a The maximum rate to
be assessed per front foot
for general improvement,
excluding cost of new land
is 49,. OFT
|5) The maximum rate for --
new curbing per front foot
is 0.45
COST FOR ROAD EXTENSION.
[6) Cost of acquiring new
land ................. -. -. 19,935.75
"a Proportion of cost to be
borne. by City and County,
So 1,S% ........,.. ...,...... 6,645.25
~ Proportion of cost to be
assessed against abutting
property in Sub-District
"a" ................. 13,290.50l
Zone I. s..-. H.. .:..-.-..~
(9) Rate of assessment per
Frnpt foot in Znno 7 for