Honolulu star-bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1912-2010, 1916-11-14

| PkONFMEN1 OF SMITH STREET
| BETWEEN QUEEN AND BERE
TANIA STREETS, IN HONOLULU
! TERRITORY OF HAWAII.
TO THE OWNERS. LESSEES, AMI
/ OCCUPANTS OF LANDS ABUT,
TING on SAID STREET PRO
| POSED TO BE ASSESSED FOR
| THE IMPROVEMENT or SAID
STREET. AND TO ALL PERSONS
INTERESTED GENERALLY,
| NOTICE Is HEREBY GIVEN that
in accordance with Resolution No 632.
the Board Of Supervisors Of the City
and County OF Honolulu propose to
modify the plan to improve Smith
street. in the District OF Honolulu
aforesaid. upon a frontage basis.
]. CHARACTER OF IMPROVE
MENT AND MATERIALS
ID Grading.
t2) Setting lava rock curbing.
90 Constructing concrete cutters
80 inches wide.
(4D Paving the entire improvement
with Pinch "Bitulithic" surfacing on
concrete base inches In thick
ness.
L It Il
sub-0istriet "a"
The entire frontage. both sides In
cluded, abutting upon Smith street
and between the mauka property line
of Queen street and tie makai prop
erty line Of Beretania street, exclud-
ing the frontage of the Dowsett Com
pany, Limited, constitutes ub-District
"A" and Is divided into zones for
assessment on graduated basis per
front foot for the cost Of acquiring
new land, as follows:
Zone is made up OF that frontage
In Sub-District "A' lying between
Queen street and the points on the
property lines midway between King
and Hotel streets.
Zone u is made up of that frontage
in Sub District "A" between the nor
therly boundary of Zone l and the
points in the property lines midway
between Hotel and Pauahi streets.
Zone lII is made up Of that frontage
constituting the balance of Sub
District "A"
Sub District ~"
The. entire frontage, both sides in
cluded, abutting upon Smith street be-
tween the mauka property line OF
Queen street and the makai property
line Of Beretania street, constitutes
Sub-District B. to be further as
sessed on a uniform basis per front
foot for the general improvement, ex-
GLIDING the cost Of acquiring new land.
and for new curbing where necessary.
III. ASSESSMENTS PROPOSED
sub.District "a.
The proportion of cost of acquiring
new land for load extension to be
borne by abuti.ng property shall be
paid by assessments against the front
age in Sub-District "A" as follows:
Zone l. The frontage in Zone !. sub
ject to assessment (being 1o47.3S feet
shall be assessed at the maximum rate
OF $6.52736 per front foot,
Zone u. The frontage in Zone II
subject to assessment (belng $3.50 |
ft) shall be assessed at the maximum
rate Of $5.12776 per front foot.
Zone III. The frontage in Zone III, |
subject to assessment (being 1064.75 |
feet shall be assessed at the maxi |
mum rate of $3.03066 per front foot.
Sub-District 90"
The cost Of the general improve
ment, excluding the cost Of acquiring |
new land and me cost of new curling, |
shall be paid bv an additional assess |
ment against the frontage, both sides |
included, in Sub-DistrIct "B" tbeing |
2853.0 feet) at the maximum rate Of |
$8.44 per from. foot.
hn - frn oton haI
paid by a further assessment at the |
maximum rate Ct $0.45 per front foot
against abuttiug lands In front Of |
which the same shall be laid.
w. NEW LAND TO BE ACQUIRED.
New land to be acquired shall be |
the same as heretofore advertised.
v. ESTIMATE OF COST.
ID The maximum estimate
of the entire cost OF the i'm
provement, including engi-
neering and incidentals. $44, 538.10 |
(2) The maximum estimate
for new curbing ........ $500 /
go The maximum estimate
Of general improvement,
excluding cost OF acquiring
new land .............. 24,O53.35 /
tD The maximum rate to
be assessed per front foot
for general improvement,
excluding cost of new land
Is o.44
(5) The maximum rate for
new curbing per front foot
Is U.f0
COST FOR ROAD EXTENSION.
co. Cost OF acquiring new
land ..................... 1s,s35.75
ca Proportion of cost to be
borne by City and County,
80 1875 ................. s,s45.25
81 Proportion Of cost to be
assessed against abutting
property in Sub-District
"A" IL. 800. 80
Zone I.
(S) Rate OF assessment per
front foot in Zone I, for
road extension .......... 6.52756
Zone %.
(l0) Rate OF assessment per
front foot in Zone ii, for