The Hawaiian gazette. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1865-1918, 1916-03-07
SEEK REMOVAL OF
0LSONASGUARD|AN
ID ~
For Client Stanley and Wilder,
File Petition In S. II. Dow
sett Estate

Through her attorneys, Stanley &
Wilder, Madeline Lucas Forrest fled
in the circuit court yesterday morning
q petition for the removal Of Clarence
III. Oison, who has been absent during
the week in Hilo, Ms guardian of Sam
uel II. Dowsett, an insane person. The
petition will he heard by Judge Whit
ney ut nine O'clock on Friday morn:
ing Of nsEtt week, in chambers.
The petition reeites that, Mr.. Olson
was appoint,d on May 10, 1915, as
guardian of the property Of DOwset' {
but failed TO fe in court as require,l
the inventory of the estate Of his ward
within thirty days. II is further al.
legged that on March 10, 1912, Madeline
u N bneas executed to Dowsett n
proplssoTy note for $3.50, giving as
additional security for the amount
eleven shares of the capital stock of
the Dowsett Company, Limited. -
IL 10 next stated that on October l,
the same year, she paid Dowsett the
fmouRt Of the note by renewal note
for MOO aud in place of the Bows ett
state shares gave az security n like
number of shares Of the Territorial In
yertment Company, these shares being
ssued in Dbwsett's name.
Wants Her Dividends ....
The pet hioner - informed, she
eiaima, thai dividends OF this stock
have gbeen pad since October I, 1912,
amounting TO $lG5 and that she de.
sires the dividends applied to the
mauBtcof the note and to pay the
balance, br that she be pad sard
nyIdends -Un the Understanding and
agreement that said promissory no q
be allowed 20 Tua until October ],
1917. ~ ECsEst 30 SEA -' gEN -.8N s.
On November 10, 1915, the petition.
er asked Elmer Westlake, her attorney
IN San Francisco 10 notify Mr.. Olson
BY sregistefed letter of these facts and
10 tfFedaest Mathematical her ac-
cunt Win said samuel H. powsett, 4"
she believes that Olson received this
.etter on or about November %, last,
Int that neither she OoT her attorney
ever received an answer to this letter
from the Honolulu attorney. A second
and similar dcmand, she says was
made ON Mr.. Olson by her lawyer, but
with the same rosult-no anger. At
this time 'fuD accounting was de-
,manded. The second letter, written in
san Francisco OH January 3, lal6, she
believes was received by Mr.. Olson
IN Honolulu on January II, or there
about.
Enter A. A. Wilder
IL yHThat at the request of petitioner,
her attorney in Honolulu, A. A. Wild.
~, during tha month of February,
1915; brought thy fersgoiRg facts oral.
~ TO the attention Of the said Char
ancs II. ,Oisorb, but said Clarence H.
,1ison has failed and neglected. to give
any accounting, to said petitioner, ami
'fas tailed and neglected TO give any
explanations why he said Clarence II.
bison, had not answered said, two
sogisteredl letsess above referred to
and had not attended TO the matters
threin referred TO. t'tSf 4. ~
The petition then says that by rea-
son of these facts Mr.. Olson is "evi.
'aeAtIy 6NsaitabIe 10 eOntinae AZ l..rard
ian of the property Of said Samuel n.
Jowsett aud IA otherwise Incapable of
dist hargiRg his tfast.,,,&, 80
t. Lastly, follows the request for Nj.
Olson . removal as gpardiau.