The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1916-05-27

ant TO Withdraw demurrer ana 10 answer
the court below. ON TIE authority OF bram y
h al Band 40; IS ,s Mcpon 1rsc- ' nisd' p"
William j. s%Chierelin, RESPONDENT. va.
VIM. A.. Prtndergas,. as Comptroller. Sc.
E, a.. defendants, hnp1esdej , Ann assi
order affirmed With costs. No opinion
orpha Stone. respondent. vs.. William u.
go costs and disbur'ement., Nc opinion
Eusen. p Martin' appellant. vs.. Gecrs.
Ringier & co, respondent. Judgment ana
order affirmed WIKI costs. No opinion
louise 1t schcnte!d. respondent. V.
MsMaii.n, snsrs s Trias,'' i.g' .sPe' asn:
plant dismissed with costs. No opinion
William VI. Graeber. appellant. IS. Frank
@ swartwout ct al, r"spond.nis JuHs-
meni affirmed with costs. No opinion
b9s,d I.yoT g: A4mT &C.; re:Ho%nds ss.
sPne'ian; jSdsmsni ana ot Cider al ss"r"e'
wy" cornsiiu. ). Mullins. appellant. vs. David
stevenson Brewing Go icsr"ndeni Jug,
ment md order AFFIRMED With costs 40
Tim,s square tmpro,sueTt Coz -.spn1-
Po',lrg 60. snpelsn,. Jadg non, affirmed
With cos;s. No opinion. order Med
sro sGth c. fSt0 4 hSiiiih. cpsppS-a;Ion, ape
liant. Judgment and 2rd'r anIr'"ed "'''
costs No opinion order hied' r-u,.,t
Hech; ct al. respondents. order arirm. I
With 80 costs and Disbursements No
Gel. @. Turner, respondent, ". the crys
tai Film Co, sppsliant Judsineni AZ.
dismissed with costs. 40 opinion. Order
.Eawari.I Dillon. sppe,'an;,; :. III. c!;y
nrmed with costs. 40 opinion iscot' and
Dcw'ins, ~ dis,sntt order niei ,o...
y Norris e; al. appellants. Ord.r %anIinsl
vfh 80 costs AID disbursements so
isaac pollock. respondent. . Char'"s J
Stunpf. appellant judgment and order
anirmel with costs. No opinion. order
hled.
Williams: re,pondsrt j]udsnsn, affirmed
The People, a.. respondent. " Ncron.
tea M.yet.Mureh. sppe'isn, Judsmcn,
rsyeTssd sna dsfssqa on n G,IGhaTs''' 80
Henrietta Michselis. appellant. ". D.
Dock s,vinss lns,i,n,,%n ct a. $50,
The Edw. J. Nobie co. Inc. re pondyn'
pellants. order affirmed win so cost.
and disbursements, WITH ,ca," TO iei.n.
on paymen; OF costs IN this couri and ~
tho court below. no opinion. order niel
Ro'. Rspr.P9!,. s. o5" H %M
reversed and new trial ordered With cost.
to appellant To abide event. unless p.slnii0
s.lpuia;e to reduce vsrdic. 20 $1,000. lr
which event the Judgment as 80 moiinci
and the order appealed from ar. Affirmed
wi.hou: costs. No opinion. settle order
Augusta ranie.. rsspondsnt y. leoaA-t
i ,iH los. " sni si.bur.. .TaTr 'nt GPinlon. VIZ s9
Scott. j. Clark. = j, and bow.itg y.
IpowAn., J. dls.en,in.n order hiea
valley National Bank. appellant. Juig
m,nt affirmed with costs. NJ opinion
Emma Ederheim.r. appellan:, ,s leo.
pold Ederhc!mer. respondent juugm"rt
to sprs,lsn' to add" event W orini5",
SA''i. order on noii.s
Tn. People. g. sGc.,so, =. Ma Ma
der reversed with 80 costs tui Iisburse-
ments ana motion denied VITA 80 costs.
James Polil'z.. appellant. v' N"w Work.
Central Railroad %, =, a.. respondent.
order 80 r. 'epS,,ei rom rsE"rs,i
ton sran;ei as stated IN order Win $40
costs s., opinlqn order a,ci
.nes L. Fi.L.r, regoondsnt order AZ.
rhs-i.. Pr"ca ,pp.i am. vs Rie. "
Poor e. al. a, Trgs'e:r 81 re-.
order and - mouiii-i ,%fhiri-l without
costs 80 opinion order hl"d
80 costs and disbursements aud motion
denied with 80 costs. No opinion. order
charle. Brock. suing 6. appellant. W.
reversed viii 80 cost. and di.bir.cmeh,,
and motion denied uith 10 costs. NJ
Nsclrema Company. respondent. ~.
, arrmr..sd With SO yo.g. AVID di-Dar-emen;
No opiuion, order h;,i.
Roe.r, ho,m.. indy ond a. TTas,'s
: WIN Gerard : rar.cn. As oe si,yn lna
executor. &c. respondent order afirmsl
S %,in Scott. j., di.s.n;ios OF l.,
In n. matter o. canies. sr m & Hoa.
land -" order affirmed Win 50 oct,
ana disbursements opinion per curtain
J9hn Fare. spgsll0n' W. II
ArSh's.' "a ,.spGna;n' 0,i" G."'">
Kate Smith Cainmae%, r',pont:n:, vs.
> pc,ian,s order AFFIRMED vt,h SO ,os,,
ar disbursement. No opinion. priri
voiHny. r..p"nd.n, ". Nm "a rre"asr
cast, ss conntr9.ler & srpci!ant ~
Hoos.' & iMnai az 'rn.n, : .gr"
.ht order affirmed WIN SIC '.'. a.
di.~6nrsem.n'. ~ TpiG!on "Tl", n.i
respondent, IS, la ne j Farmer, indy y
e al; defendants, Pan American r-int!u.
Il o. Inc, MIRA parry, appellant. 'Ndrf
. No opinion. order aicd.
4, II III. mate e GT%n' j. Hn.,S g..
b~urssments. No opinion order MED
a AGnes Csrley, Respondent, " MiG,Hu,
, B-a'h GO, 81 a, app, anis order 'n"'ii
Ned by directing that tn" order for exam
instion ne modified 50 a. TO auiho~Iz" Ia
examination onl, a. 20 the possession, con
iro. aud condition % The pr"u3~'S up.'
which plaintiff claims 80 hay" he,u 'uIur".
and - 50 modified affirmed wiih"Ht Gusts
- l No ntttF1nl IL. Fts an
Gll--pps Tuz.-", suing, g., -fpp'lt Hi
: Ns American bonding 60. - Ba,'imor"
e respondent. order AFFIRMED with SIC cost
and. disbursements NO opinion pr,!s
fled,
In the matter OF George Il Loud. nru"i
service Commission. ~, respondents 90
ments. No opinion Oricr Alcd.
Ellison Jones. respondent. -. E.!1ahcti
IS. Emery, appellant. order modi''I H
directing thai the order for examination
anime defendant only AS to whether sH.
slRncd The Information upon which the -
IS r'si was made, and as So modified nn rr|",
i, withou; costs. No opinion, settle orde
" on notice
Julius Albert. responder, - Eus,uo \
S with Sic costs and disburs"iuenis ~
opinion. order Glsd
The People, s., ~, charles Lung Mo
ton to dismiss appeal granted. order t''i
Y Charles Il Ruchenark ~. Isaac ~ Lew
. Motion to dismiss appeal granted with 81
stated In order order fl'ed.
Gustaye r, Deiair vs.. Anna Hammorst"i'
ss sole cxecutrtN, Sc. Motion To dismiss
appeal granted with so costs, order h.o,l