Honolulu star-bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1912-2010, 1916-11-18
BY AUTHORITY
NOTICE

NOTICE ." -.
PUBLIC HEARING. DECEMBER 3.
PROPOSED NOTIFICATION OF IN.
PRoSEMENT OF SMITH STREET
BETWEEN QUEEN. AND BERE.
TANIA STREETS. N. HONOLULU,
TERRITORY OF HAWAII J.. r. -:
TO THE oWNEH LESSEES. AND
OCCUPANTS OF LANDS. :ABUT-
TING on SAID STREET PRO
POSED TO BE ASSESSED FOR
THE IMPROVEMENT OF. SAID
STREET, AND TO ALL PERSONS
INTERESTED GENERALLY.
NOTICE is HEREBY GIVEN that
in accordance with Resolution No 632,
the Board of Supervisors Of the CITY
and County Of Honolulu propose to
modify the plan 10 I'M prove Smith
street. in the District OF Eonoinlu
aforesaid. upon a frontage basis. -"..
j. CHARACTER OF IMPROVE
MENT AND MATERIALS -.
% Grad!ng. ~.-. -.
~ Setting lava rock curbing
49, Constructing concrete cutters
80 inches wide. r.. -..-.-s~ "
t4l Paving the entire Improvement
With Pinch "Bitulithic" sUrfeCing on
a concrete base 3 inches in thick.
ness. j.. H..
IT, FRONTAGE To BE ASSESSED
Sub-0istrict "A" .. -. :.:...
The entire frontage, both sides in
cluded, abutting upon Smith street
and between the mauka property line
of Queen street and tie makai prop
erty line Of Beretania street, exclud
ing the frontage oil the Dowsett Com
pany, Limited. constitutes b-District
"A" and is divided into zones for
assessment ON q graduated basis per
front foot for the cost of acquiring
new land. as follows: ~ ..... IL.
Zone is made up of that frontage
in Snb-District "A lying between
Queen street and the points on the
property lines midway between King
and Hotel streets. il. -. III
Zone u is made up of that frontage
in Sub-District "a" between the nor.
therly boundary Of Zone i and the
points in the property lines midway
between Hotel and Pauahi streets.
Zone Ili is made Up of that frontage
constituting the balance of Sub
District "A" FL. u H.. I'll.
Sub District "B" -......-
The entire frontage. both sides in
cluded, abutting upon Smith street be-
tween the mausa property line OF
Queen street and the makai property
line of Beretania street, constitutes
Sub-DiStrict B., to be further. as
sessed on a uniform basis per front
foot for the general improvement, ex-
Guiding the cost Of acquiring new land,
and for new curbing where necessary
HI. ASSESSMENTS PROPOSED 4
Sub-District "a" ~.s
The proportion of cost of acquiring
new land for load extension to be
borne by abutt:ng property shall be
paid by assessments against the front
age in Sub-District "A" as follows:
Zone {. The frontage in Zone /, sub
ject to assessment (being 1047.S9 feet
shall be assessed at the maximum rate
of $6.52736 per front foot.
Zone II. The frontage in Zone II,
subject to assessment tbeing 629.30I
ft.) shall be assessed at the maximum
rate of $5.12776 per front foot
Zone 10. The, frontage in Zone III,
subject to assessment (being 106475
feet shall be assessed at the maxi
mum rate of $3.03066 per front foot
Sub-Distriet "B"
The cost of the general improve
ment, excluding the cost of acquiring
new land and the cost of new curbing,
shall be paid by an additional assess
ment against the frontage, both sides
included, in Sub-District "B' (being
2S53.0 feet at the maximum rate of
$S.44 per from. foot. II. IL. IN
The cost Of new curbing shall be
paid by further assessment at the
maximum rate CT s045 per front foot
against abuttiug lands in front of |
which the same shall be laid.
". NEW LAND TO BE ACQUIRED.
New land to be acquired shall be |
the same as heretofore advertised.
v. ESTIMATE OF COST. .<..
ID The maximum estimate "...
of the entire cost of the i'm
provement, including engi- =:
neering and incidentals. :. $44, $3.50 |
(2) The maximum estimate
for new curbing ....... $4,000 |
CD The maximum estimate
of general Improvement, H.. |
excluding cost OF acquiring H.. =...s.
new land ............... 24.053.35 |
ca The maximum rate to - -. |
be assessed per front foot |
for general Improvement, ....
excluding cost of new land
Is Ola
(51 The maximum rate for 49,:
new curbing per front foot
is ....................... O.45
COST FOR ROAD EXTENSION.
l6) Cost of acquiring new II.
land .......... ,........... 19,935.75
ID Proportion of cost to be +. ."..
borne by City and County, II"
90 1-3& 6.645.25