The Lamar register., 1916-12-20
BRYAN AGAINST
OWNERSHIP BY
THE GOVERNMENT
GIYss AsxIandS Committee His
Views on Railroad Control
COMPETITION PREFERABLE.

Federal Regulation Should Not Be Al
lowed to Exclude Exercise Of State
Authority, He Contsnds-Thinks Rail-
road Stocks Should Represent Actual
Value and Be Stable ss Government
Bsnda
Washington, Dec IL. william J..
Bryan, who startled the country ten
yssrs ago by advocating government
ownership of railroads. appeared be-
fore the Nswlands Joint Committee on
Interstate Commerce last week In sup
port Of the claim that the states should
be allowed to retain authority over the
regulation Of all transportation lines
within their borders. Mr.. Bryan eI.
planned that he had long regarded gov
ernment ownership as inevitable, but
only because OF railroad opposition to
effective regulation.
Against osVsrnmsnt Ownership.
Personally l cannot say that de
stre government ownership" be eI
planned, because | lean to the indi-
vidual idea rather than to the collec-
tive idea, that Is. l believe that gov
eminent ownership In desirable only
where competition is impossible"
Alfred p. Thorn. counsel to the Rail
way Executives Advisory Committee.
previously had presented before the
members OF the Newlands Committee
a. one OF his reasons for urging a bet
ter balanced and more systematic reg
ulation OF railroads the argument that
this Is the only alternative to govern
ment ownership. Calling attention TO
the restrictions imposed upon the
transportation lines by conflicting state
laws and regulations, to the practical
cessation OF new construction and to the
impossibilty under existing conditions
Of securing the new capital needed for
extensions and betterments Of railway
facilities, he warned the Congressman
that unless they provided \ fair and
reasonable system OF regulation that
would enable the railroads to meet the
growing needs OF the country's bust
ness the national government would
be compelled to take over the owner
ship OF the lines with all the evils at
tendant upon such a system
Preservation Of Competition
Mr.. Bryan. on the other hand. holds
that the further extension OF federal
authority over the railroads would be
a step In the direction of government
ownership. He advanced the view that
the GENERALIZATION OF control In the
hands Of the national government
would impose too great a burden upon
the regulating body, would offer strong
temptation to railroads to interfere in
politics and would encourage the gen
eral movement toward Capitalization
OF power In the federal government at
the expense Of the states. He said that
he cid not object TO consultations OF
railroad lines so long as they did not
destroy competition. that he knew Of
no complaint against great railway
systems because OF their size and that
he believed that the preservation OF
competition was the test to be applied
to all consultations.
Regulation Of sseuritiss-
Mr.. Bryan declared himself In favor
OF national regulation of railway stock
and bond issues. but added that he saw
no reason why that should exclude the
states from acting on the same sub
ject as to state corporations. Il would
like to see the stock of 4 railroad, as
long As 1t In in private hands. made as
substantial and as rEvarying as the
value Of a government bond" he as
serted
He suggested that railroad eapitali-
Eation be readJusted to equaliEe 1t with
actual valuation OF the property rep
resented, making due allowance for
equities, and that when this was done
the roads should be allowed to earn
sufficient income to keep their stock
at par and to create surplus. The
latter, he tentatively proposed. might
he allowed To Amount q Der cent