The Red Cloud chief., 1916-06-22

county assessor, to which ruling the
said r. r. Co. excepted and gave notice
Of appeal.
Now comes DR.. H. s. Reed and com
plains that his lots and improvements,
] to o, Talbots add to Guide Rock, are
assessed too high in comparison with
property Of like nature adjoining and
asks for refund on 1915 tax, he having
paid same under protest and filed bill
for refund as provided by law. The
complaint was investigated and found
to be correct and the claim allowed.
June Is, 1916
Board Of Equsliz alton met pursuant
to adjournment.
R. B. Thompson complains that his
land In Sec. 9 Cowles precinct 10 90.
sessed too high and asks that the land
be reduced In amount 90 10 to take the
~ acres tillable land at $50 and the
balance of 81 acres at $50 making .
reduction of $3.50 in the total %.
sessment. Assessment on the 43l
acres placed at $500 instead OF $500.
VIM. Crsbil complains that the Ed
of 2 IL assessed $1,000 is to high and
asks that it be reduced to $1,000 on
account Of land adj lining being az.
sessed lower than his. Board to in.
vestigate. No cause for complaint
found. Refused.
G. w. Lindsey asks that his land be
reduced in accordance with neighbours
land adj Dining and that so acres be re.
duced to $50 account Of sand drift.
Refused. Also that his improvements
are too high. Cut Improvements to
$4,000.
Now comes E. Carpenter and com.
plains that his assessment on S. E e.
IA IL IS too high and axis that it he
reduced to $500. Request granted.
Now comes E U. Overman and com.
plains that his assessment of his in.
provements on Lot C.. V. annex IL city
Of Red Cloud lie too high and asks that
it be reduced from $500 to s4sO) on
account of removal Of part of his i'm.
provements to other lots. Request
granted.
Now comes Chss. Gather and asks
that his assessment on the S. 81 II
Batin Twp. be reduced from $l5600 to
same "a land in same neighborhood. Re.
ferred to whole Board to investigate.
No cause for complaint found
Now comes r. Florence and asks
that his assessment on Webster County
Bark on lots 567S. Blk. 2Garhar's
A ID. he reduced to $500. Cut to $500
as s,ked.
G. +. Gather asks that his 6 lo's Blk.
10 S e. NJ Add be reduced from S675 to
conform with lots Of like value. Not
granted.
Also as TO 8 tool C. from 5000 to
$500 Cut to $500
Also So to 6 lots in Blk. Is SIPS TO
$1,000. Not granted.
J,e TOpham asks that his lots Blk.
/ CARRIERS Add. lots 8 IL assessed at
1850 be cut to $50 90. Granted.
Jas. Peterson objects that the gar.
age property, Los % "a Blk. y X. G
are ass, ssed at more than their actual
value. 20 wit.
L'ts II 20 improvements Sl700
$3.50 The lots are raised $l45 from
sss s'ment of 1912 and improvements
ave TT the same.
H. has been trying to sell the prop
cry at $3.50 and can't do it.
Tue two lotss next south are as
sHssed al $575 and are not worth it.
Cut garage property to $500. No cut
rs TO OTIS at 1919.
Now comes J u, KroH and complains
that his assessment on improvements
in Biz lots to Bladcn are too
high and asks that they be reduced
from $1,000 to $4,000. Cut to $1,000.
O. lverson asks that his assessment
On i'm provements y lots lO.ll Blk Il
lbladen bc reduced from SGjOO to $4,000
granted.
Now comes Chas. Hodges and com
plains that his lots Blk. lO-j Vance,
Add TO Guide Rock are assessed toe
high and asks that assessment be re
ducei from S5j.O1 to So 80 AMI count
treasurer ordered to reduce 1915 tan
to this amount, on account OF double
assessment and stricken from tax list
tax on mortgage for l9li-l5 on same
property.
Now comes V. S. Hall and complains
that his assessment on improve ment'
on lots 4, ), 6, Blk 3, Bladen IS too
high and asks that it be reduced from
S3GjO to 5000. Cut to $1,000 and that
assessment on improvements on lots
go Bladcn he reduced from $ll 600 Il
5000. No cut on store building.
Now comes C., +. Gund and asks tina
SW a $40 valued at $1,000 be reduc
ed to SG6oO. Granted
} W. Hodges tax on lots :, 6, Blk.
Vances Add to be reduced for 1913 il
amount $500 valuation and count,
treasurer ordered to stricken SANE
from tax list
Henry Dedrick complains that hi
Improvements on lots 1912 are too hig
and asks that assessment be reduce
from 5000 to $500. Cut to 500 as ask
ed. Also on the W II ! + Blk he re
duccd from Sll5O to $500 on accoun
of c ug in draw and II t good fo
building lots. Cut to $500. Also AL
ing that lots Is TO % X. n j. Add be r.
duced from 500 to $50. Cut to 49,
Now comes Rctta Miner and ask
that taxes on Improvements on lots
to 10 Blk Miners Add be reduce
from $1,000 valuation to $50. Granite,
Refund ordered for l9li-l5 of SIS!
a count of erroneous assessment 81
having paid tax on property she dot
not own and other M rites having