Putnam patriot., 1916-05-19

\ letter was here fe td from Mrs. Naylof in which she ss3s, - VII try to do aIi you want me to do. will not leave anything undone can physically do. Knowing 1 love you you should try to be more lenieat with me. could cry Monsieur to think how little you love me-"
 From Brewer on the 11th: oI love you ony way dear. Your future hap pines, depends upon me. Renembe ber that 1 nm great big boss and that you must Hll in line. This boss has a yeiAe touch unless opposed.
 The next letter is from Brewer to Mrs Thomilson, where Mrs. Ngylor stopped at Sherbfooke, Canada He tells Mrs Thomilson of the arIivai of Mrs Naylor nt Reno, much 10 his re. gret lie hnds she Is taking morphine nRain. Sae even came under the in huence of man there and WAS even considering seeing an attorney with him. "She needs To stop drugs and uq 4or to increase her wtll power.
 Letters sent by Brewer 5to the Put. nam bunk, telling of his being dis. saii>Htd win Lawyer Auslins ser vices, were read Attorney Austin has been tn court throughout the hear. ing He was retained by Mrs. Naylof a4 her counsel to succeed Eeafts, thogle & sherman.
 When the matter of introducing the letters written by Mrs. Nay1oF to Brewer came up Mir. Austin told the court that they dovetailed in with let. ters read from Brewer 10 Mrs. Naylor and when read would take of some of the "sling" to those letters and make them plainer.
 The opponents of the will rested and the proponents counsel called George ( Austin of the legal firm Of Austin, McLannshan X Merritt, New York.
 Mir. Austin testified that he first met Mrs Naylor iu Boston, in November 1915 by appointment. He talked over her nfinirs with her and she wanted to have him take charge ot them. He knew that EvaTts, Choale and Shef man were her attorneys and told her 10 think the matter over before she finally decided 10 make change. She told him of the Power Of attorney she had given Brewer and said thut the only fault she had to find with EvaFts, Choale and sherman was that they would not recognize MT Brewer and dtdn treat him right She told him of her close relation with Brewer Hnd that they intended to be married. Her mental condition was perfectly normal when he had seen her.
 On cross examination he said that The second time he saw Mrs. Nay they took up the matter of her trip to Reno and also of getting her properly separated from that Of her daughter. She told him she had received letter from Brewer telling her 10 expedite his divorce by arranging some way to gel his wife 10 Nevada SD he could serve process on her.
 she spoke about her will, the one being offered for probate, which WAS then in bis office safe. He went over it with her quite carefully. lie asked her especially about relations between her and her daughter. She spoke highly oi her daughter but WIS dis appointed that her dsguhter preferred Easland 10 this country. She spoke ot Brewers being of greater assistance to her than doctors or her friends. Alter he terd the win to her she ssid Il was entirely satisfactory,
 Witness had known Seahufs Daaae Brewer since 1884 They belonged 10 the same college fraterni.y and 10 The same club in New York. in October 1915 Brewer first asked him 10 take up