Honolulu star-bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1912-2010, 1916-12-11

TORY OF HAWAII. =. + -: --=
TO THE OWNERS. LESSEES AND
4 OCCUPANTS OF LANDS ABUT-
TING ON SAID STREET PR0PoS.
/ ED TO BE ASSESSED FOR THE
/ IMPROVEMENT OF SAID STREET,
| AND TO ALL PERSONS INTER
4 ESTED GENERALLY. -.
| NOTICE is HEREBY GIVEN that in
accordance with Resolution No. CAB
and Resolution NJ. 654, the Board of
Supervisors Of the City and County of
Honolulu propose to improve Hotel
| Street, in the District Of Honolulu
/ aforesaid, upon a frontage basis.
/ 70. CHARACTER OF IMPROVEMENT.
Hotel Street shall be widened along
the properties of John ID. Detor and
| the Estate of James Campbell, be-
tween Fort and Bethel Streets, in
GLIDING reconstruction Of all build
| ings and other improvements, to con-
| form to new street line which is
/ q continuation OF the present prop
e-ty line of Hotel Street at Bethel
| Street.
~. FRONTAGE TO BE ASSESSED.
The entire frontage. both sides in
| cluded, abutting on Hotel Street, to be
assessed for the said proposed i'm
provement begins at the sontheasterly
property line OF Nuuanu Avenue and
ends at the northwesterly property
line OF Bishop Street, excluding the
frontages OF John d. Deto- and the
Estate OF James Campbell, and is
divided into zones for assessment on
a graduated basis per front foot, as
| follows:
ZONE / is made up Of all that
| frontage, both sides of Hotel Street
| included, lying between Nuuanu Az
enue and the southeasterly property
line of Bethel Street.
ZONE II is made up of all that
frontage, both sides of Hotel Street
included, lying between the southeast
erly boundary of Zone and the north
westerly property line of Fort Street.
ZONE III is made up of all that
frontage, both sides of Hotel Street
included, lying between the southeast
erly boundary of Zone II and the
northwesterly property line of Bishop
Street.
m. ASSESSMENT PROPOSED.
The proportion of cost of acquiring
new land for road widening and for
incidentals to be borne by abutting
property shall be, paid by assessments,
as follows:
ZONE /. The frontage in Zone l
subject to assessment (being 1855
feet) shall be assessed at the maxi
mum rate of $12S2 per front foot.
ZONE II. The frontage in Zone II
subject to assessment. (being 307.4
feet) shall be assessed at the maxi
mum rate of $52.62 per front foot.
ZONE III. The frontage in Zone III
subject to assessment (being Sill
feet) shall be assessed at the maxi
mum rate of 1882 per front foot.
Nv. NEW LAND TO BE ACQUIRED.
The following described land is re-
quired for widening Hotel Street:
Parcel (a)-John d. Detor.
Portion of l.. c. A. 621.
Beginning at the east corner of this
piece, said point being the present
west corner of Fort and Hotel Streets,
the co-ordinates of which referred to
the Government Survey MANIPULATION
Station "PunchbowP' are 843.90 feet
south, and 4124.24 feet west, as shown
on Government Survey Map No. sos,
and running by true azimuths:
1. SOC 39'-13.20 feet along northwest
side of Fort Street;
2. 1862 22'-36.65 feet along new line;
8. 229o 1880 feet along L. c. A.
621 to new line;
4. 326o 45'-37.01 feet along old line
to initial point
Area 488 square feet.
Parcel (b)-James Campbell Estate.
Beginning at the east corner of this
piece, said point being by true all
muths and distance 1852 As 37.01 feet
from present west corner of Hotel
and Fort Streets, the co-ordinates of
said point of beginning referred to
Government Survey Triangulation Sta
ton "Punchbowl." being S12.95 feet
south, and 4l44.53 feet west, as shown
on Government Survey Registered
Map No. sos, and running By true all
muths:
/. 49, 1880 feet along L. c. A.
Ell to s. Reynolds;
2. 1862 22'-112.00 feet along new line;
8. 233o 50,-13.90 feet;
4. $3.50 47'-33.04 feet along old line;
5. 55o 1880 feet:
6. $3.50 45'-7790 feet along old line to
the initial point
Area 1884 square feet.
v. ESTIMATES OF COST.
ID Cost Of acquiring new
land ................$4O, OOO.OO
ing. etc. ............ 1,0OO.O0
Total cost of Improvement. s41, 900 90
(3) Proportion of cost to be
borne by the City and
County, $3.50 of s4O,-
100000 ............. 1O,O00OO
(4) Proportion of cost to be