Weekly journal-miner., 1916-02-09
ASKSANNU[MENT WHILE FORMER
 WIFE WEDS
ROBERT A. TURNBULL'S MOTION THAT DECREE BE VACATED BECOMES MORE COMPLICATED.
(From Tuesdays Daily.)

Mrs. Jessie TurnDull, who was granted divorce from her husband, Robert A. Turnbull, on November 6, 1915, has been married to D. L. Bost and is now living in New Orleans with her new spouse. adding to the complications of her former hus- bands motion to have the decree set aside on grounds that she gained it through fraud.
 The first news of the marriage came out yesterday when Turnbull was on the stand testifying in his own behalf. he stating that he had not learned of the wedding until three days ago when he was informed by the former Mrs. Turnbulls father, I. F. Burnett. The case was presented to Judge F. O. Smith with LeRoy Anderson and George w. Nilsson acting in be- half of the husband, and T. c. Norris and E. J. Mitchell representing the wife. If the judgment IS set aside 1t will probably cause the annulment of the second marriage. The jurist took | the case under advisment until Feb ruary 18th. when a decision will be given, or Mrs. Bost. formerly Mrs. Turnbull, will be called from New Orleans to testify in answer to her husbands motion.
 When the divorce was granted, Turnbull. who is motion picture man. failed to appear or answer. The husband while on the stand testified that his wife led him into believing that she did not intend to carry the suit through and for that reason he said he did not answer. He also tes- | tihed that his wife had not made Prescott her home for a year prior to starting her suit for divorce. During part of that time Turnbull was in Mexico and to prove that his wife had not lived in Prescott but was in. Los Angeles the greater part of the time. 24 letters ne received from her while she was in Los Angeles were intro duced. He also testified that he sent money to her to support her and their child up to few days before she was granted her decree.
 Turnbull after learning that his wife was granted a divorce said that he went to see Attorney Anderson, who advised him to go and re-marry. The witness said that his former wife re- fused to marry him the second time.
 Tom Bate testified that during last July under the instructions of Turn ] bull he went to Norris & Mitchelps office to make inquiries about the suit and was told that the attorneys in tended to go ahead with it.
 | I. P. Burnett. the father of the former Mrs Tur1bull, said that she had made her residence in Prescott | for a year prior to filing her suit for divorce. but stated that for short time she was in Long Beach with a motion picture company.
 Call Calendar.
 The calendar for the month of Feb ruary was called and the following cases were set: State of Arizona vs. Arizona Power Company. for Febru- ary 10; Cora Suder vs. Albert Heller ct al. for February 10; D. F. Mitchell vs. Baumann Mines Company. for February 9; State Mutual Building & Loan Association vs. A. s. Gilmer and wife. for February 12; Wilmot w. Midgley ct al. vs. George A. Car ter ct all, for February 23; Thomas Powlas vs. George Domaine ct al. for February 9; George w. Hull vs. Hull Copper Company for February 9; Fife B. Heath vs. Albert K. Heath, for February 12; James Ford vs. C. E. Stewart ct al. for February l2; Harry F. Allen vs. Alamos Land & Irriga- t;or, Cor,nan,, for EPhruarv 10. Geo Staletto vs. E. T. Frank. for Febru- ary Is: Thomas Isaackson vs. L. Mur- dock ct al. for February 26; Nathan Shutz vs. H. L. Bainum ct al, for February 9.