Pine Bluff daily graphic., 1916-05-14

of the skull. That frequently or usu- ally produces that extravasation of blood into the eye.
 0. When had you last seen him?
 A. was on the train on which he was placed coming f;om Watson to McGehee. It was returning from Memphis to McGehee On the same train, and Judge Parker asked me to look at him and give him casual opinion as to the outcome of the wound, and l went into the baggage car and examined him just casually.
 I opened both his eyes, found the pupils distended widely and no re- flex from the ligh.. They were para lyzed. I noticed also paralysis of the left arm. so, assuming from that that the wound was mortal, did not make any further examination. That blood was not there then. l did not observe it all all. 0. Did you notice an abrasion on the side of his nose here (indicating)
 A. Very slight. Some attention was called to it today tthe post mortem.
 0. Then that abrasion, or what ever it was, 10 the eye took place after you had first seen him on the train?
 A. Yes, I think so. Of course the undertaken had drawn good deal of blood from the body, and before that, of course, it is possible that there could have been a good deal more in there than I saw this afternoon. o. What is you opinion, Doctor. as to whether or not there was blow on his eye; whether or not he was struck on the eye; whether that might have caused that condition there?
 A. We'll, should rather think not; because, had it been so. l saw him perhaps an hour and half or two hours after the bullet wound was in- flicted, and I should think that that period of time having elapsed, would have noticed it, if it had been due to blow.
 o. Your opinion is that the con- dition of the eye that you found was not due to a blow?
 A. I rather think not. That is my opinion.
 Witness excused.
 Dr. Brown, being first duly sworn, was examined as a witness, and testi- fled as follows:
 Direct Examination.
 By MT. ,Parham:
 0. Were you present this after noon when there was an examination made of the body of Tom Hudleston
 A. Yes, sir
 O. Now the bullet wound went in somewhere down here on his neck (indicating). didn't it?
 A. Yes. sir.
 o. And came out on the back part of his head?
 A. Yes, sir.
 o. What did you find. Doctor, with reference to fracture of the skull?
 A. We found the one fracture. IL was made by the bullet.
 0. Were there other fractures? l men by that what I might call cracks in the skull. I guess. that merged off from that?
 A. Yes. sir.
 Q. In your opinion. were they caused by the bullet wound?
 A. res, BIT.
 o. Did you find depression in the scalp? A. Yes. sir.
 Q. Was that recent or an old scar?
 A. That was an old scar. c. Was there place that was ap- parently burned on his chest-pow- der burned? A. T don't know whether it was powder burned or not There were some marks there, but l didn't ex- anime those.
 Q. What did you find when you examined the body? A. Confusion Of the eye-lid. It was black. It was caused from in in- filtration of blood into the tissues, O. Was that. in your opinion. caused from the nature of the wound: : A. We'll, couldn't tell. vt was his right eve. and it doesn't take much of blow to make the eye black.
 Q. In your opinion. was that caused from a blow to his eye? A. I couldnh say. There was no evidence of a blow. Q. No evidence of a blow? A. Not to the skin. The eye-lid was black. was all. O. Is it vour oninion that fre- quently from an injury such as in this case 'here is caused a condition like that to the eye? A. T. could happen yeS. sir. c. Was there an abrasion on the side of his nose?