Bisbee daily review., 1916-06-24
Saturday Morning, June A, 1916.
WHAT IS COMING?

WHAT IS COMING?
 If there less of aggressive preparation in Wash ngton for whatever may eventuae in relations wit Mexico the country might be described actually sui ferng suspense Is there to be- or not to be dec aration war? Pending reply to the question: the United States using to be ready for what ever may arise certain that this country will no' be the aggressor however less certain that President Wilson will act with rmness if Carranza i the aggressor
 The best that can be hoped explosive stus on is that the show of present force will as apparently faint hopes still hold out in Washington higher quarters daunt any hotspurs presumin on our patience supposed weakness or will call an! elaborate bluff if such be Mexico City program Th worst will betemporariy-for both sides of the border the gnting of intervention though the long run tha may be the best for bot the world interested in Mexicos fate.
 In the seeking of clear legal title to the mog1 ized miltamen inside Mexico, and to anticipate by r fortnight statutory passing into full federal aee lance there finally displayed resouteness of purpose following singular patience Possibly the ntolerabf menace of the military situation made thes measures taken on day reply to Carranza tn very least that could in prudence be done Hour-to-hour developments with the sparks so plentiful below the border the fantastic tales spread ther among the ignorant credulous and passionate may de termne how and precaution and defence ma' merge into full intervention.
 The question perhaps may remain historically unap swered as whether graspng of the nette much ear Tier would wiser practicable, or dferen course been among personalities and passions tangled situation The retort will always be hand that if Diaz had to pass before certain forces at work would have Huerta that basic conditions, economic anf well political, could not be so poulticed Dispute over the string episodes may have it's poca bearings for us regards national relations, it i largely split The balancing question is wheth CT history has last shaped for the Augear task of intervention
 Intervention is not intrinsicaly pleasant prospec for us as whole people. Should it come it would bf costly in several senses the wretched Mexican peo pie as a whole would still more racial misery Whether it shall develop that any other for egn fingers helped tangle the skein, would con vague possibilities of distraction or com plicaton in an uneasy world when might wei wish all our energies and thoughts still clear
 In a more immediate tangible it would mean of course for our national guard in its estate es and chance To q degree it would mean both disturb ance and fresh fp business. It might variat ly affect our business relations with European belger ens possibly would take up slack of their lessen ed orders might be glad that their buyinf had left with certain capaci-+es of supply
 But the larger view-should intervention become ou duty-woud ultimately lie in the benefit to this continen including Mexico of the cleanup process. For seyera situation been fostering for while under cover, in antpahy and then in outrage be low the border It would the task of Cub; again. Is the chosen time of history for thu needfu surgery?
 Support to stable government guidance toward re form real democracy. would mean for the harrowe Mexican millions huge benefit, apparently o.herwis beyond their grasp It would be vast relief to al whose material interests touch Mexico, and wonld fc the world involve great accession 10 its resources would be the lasting insurance for peace an' security and perhaps manifest destiny" an' all our relations with neighbors southward.
 These would be the silver Innings the intervention cioud-ghould it spread and break