The Washington herald., 1916-10-31
COURT PROCEEDINGS
Supreme Court of the United States.

Present-The Chief Justice, Mr.. Justice
McKenna, Mr.. Justice Holmes. Mr.. JUS
tice Day, Mr.. Justice Van Devanter, Mr..
Justice Pitney, Mr.. Justice McReynolds,
Mr.. Justice Brandies. and Mr.. Justice
Clarke.
John r. Neary, OF Wilmington, Del.
A. Stuart Young, of Washington, D. c.;
Herbert Boggs. of Newark, N. j.; F,
Brooke Whiting, Of Cumberland, Nd.
John T. Barker, of Chicago, Ill; George
Louis Eppler. of Cumberland, Nd; Will
lam Pruden Smith, of Miami, Fla; Jesse
S. Epstein, of New York City, Edward
Stevens Beach, of Ridgefield, Conn.
Charles F. Greenwood, of Dallas. Tex.
and George E. Maddox, of Rome, Ga,
were admitted to practice.
No. 63S-Interisland Steam Navigation
Company, Limited, plaintifr in error, VS.
George E. Ward. In error to the United
States Circuit Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit. Dismissed for want OF
jurisdiction. Opinion by Mr.. Chief JUS
tice White.
The Chief Justice also announced the
following orders of the court:
No. 3-Mary Helen Brown, plaintiff in
error. VS.. the City Of New York In er-
ror to the District Court OF the United
States for the Southern District Of New
York. Per curiam: Dismissed for want
Of Jurisdiction upon the authority Of;
/. Deming VS.. Carlisle Packing Company,
226 United States, lO2, los; Consolidated
Turnpike VS.. Norfolk Railway Company,
22s United States, 59s, 600; Ennis Water
Works VS.. Ennis. 233 United States, 652
65S; Parker VS.. McLain. 257 United States,
469, 47l-472. 2-Shoemaker VS.. United
States, 1F United States, 282, 321; Prosser
VS.. Northern Pacific Railroad, 152 United
States bgs RamO0an ITpEfa5
States. 54S. 596; Ramapo Water Company
VS.. City of New York. 236 United States,
57s.
No. 2S-Right Rev. Libert Rubert Boey-
naems, Bishop Of Zeugma, vicar apos-
tolic of Hawaii, trustee, plaintiff in er-
ror, VS.. L. All Leong In error to the
Supreme Court Of the Territory of
Hawaii Per curiam: Judgment affirmed
with costs upon the authority Of Lewis
& Cooke VS.. Atcherley, 222 United States,
2sS, 2s4; John Ii Estate VS.. Brown. 2S5
United States. 342 349; Kapiolani Estate
vs.. Atcherley. 23s United States. l19, 1856;
Cardona VS.. QuinOnes, 24O United States,
So, S.
No. 31-Southern Railway, Carolina Di-
vision. plaintiff in error, vs. Fannie G.
briggs and her husband, r. D. briggs
and
No. 32-Southcrn Railway. Carolina Di-
&
briggs, by his guardian ad Item, H D.
briggs. In error TO the Supreme Court
Of the State Of South Carolina Per
curiam: Judgments reversed with costs
upon the authority of Kansas City South
ern Ry. vs.. Carl. 27 L. s., $50. 6-3: Bos-
ton and Maine r. Co. VS.. Hooker. 233 L.
s, 81, ll0-l13; Louisville & Nashville R r.
Co. VS.. Maxwell, 81 l. S. 81. 97-9S
No. S6-Martin II. Free. plaintiff in er-
ror, VS.. the Western Union Telegraph
Company. In error to the Supreme Court
Of the State Of Wisconsin Per curlam
Dismissed for want Of Jurisdiction upon
the authority OF: l. Deeming VS. Carlisle
Packing Co. 226 L. S. lO3. lO2, Ir5: Con-
sol. Turnpike VS.. Norfolk Ry. Co. 22s
U. s., 596, 800; Ennis Water Works VS..
Ennis. 233 L. s, $50, 65S: Parker vs. Nc
Lain, 237 L. S, 459, 4Tl-472 2 John VS..
Paulin, 81 L. S, $50, 5S5-5s6; Mcdonald VS..
Oregon r. & Nav. Co, 233 L. S. 6S5 6SS-
go. 3. Simon VS.. Craft 132 L. S, 427,
437; Louisville & Nashville r. r. Co. VS.
Schmidt, 1T L. S. 30
No. I-The city of Montgomery, plain
tin in error. VS.. r. H. Greene ct al; and
No. 42-The city Of Montgomery, plain
tin in error, VS.. w r. MCDade ct al.
In error to the Supreme Court of the
State of Alabama Per curiam: Dis
missed for want Of jurisdiction upon the
authority OF: l. Deming vs.. Carlisle Pack
ing Co. 22S L. s, 1o2 lO6; Consol. Turn
pike VS.. Norfolk Ry Co, 225 /. s, 596,
800: Ennis Water Works VS. Ennis. 236
L. S, 652, 65s; Parker VS.. McLain, 81
L. S, 469, 471-472. ,. Stewart VS. Kansas