The Washington herald., 1916-06-30
Supreme Court, District of Columbis
Equity Division No. :
Justice Mccoy.


Justice Mccoy.
Prince VS.. schafer; order referring ac-
count Of receivers to the auditor; plain
tits attorneys. Darr, Peyser and Taylor;
defendants attorney. Alexander Wolf.
Loeb. ct al VS.. Friedlander; order re-
ferring account Of trustees to auditor;
plaintiffs attorney, Alexander Wolf; de-
fendant's attorneys, ]. I. Peyser and g.
w. Onutt. jr.
Nairn VS.. Drury; decree appointing
Frank Stetson substituted trustee; plain
tins attorney. Frank Stetson.
Atwen VS.. Atwell; rule as to contempt:
returnable first Friday occurring two days
after service; plaintiffs attorneys ]. NJ.
McLachlen and c. W. Owen
Ridenour vs. Ridenour, submitted state
ment Of evidence; plaintiffs attorneys.
Barnard & johnson and w. z. Lester;
defendants attorneys, o. B. Drake and
J. c. Cuttings.
In re lunacy Of Harry o. Waters; order
of publication.
Metropolitan Loan and Trust Company
VS.. Washington Silicate Brick Co.; order
discharging rule and denying Injunction;
to amend in ten days Cby Justice STAFF
ford); plaintiffs attorneys. w. ]. LAM
bert and D. W. Baker; defendants attor-
ney. c. T. Carusi.
Briggs VS.. Godding; order confirming
report Of auditor; plaintiffs attorneys,
E B. Briggs and VIM. H. Dennis.
Richmond Improvement Co. VS. Hight;
on hearing; plaintiffs attorneys, d. W.
O'Donaghue, F. 3. Rhodes and P. B.
Cromelin; defendants attorneys. D. T.
Wright, T. N. Wampler and Ellis & Dom
nldson.
Motions for today at 10 a. m.
L-Waters VS.. Waters; attorneys, Col
laday-Johnson-Keigw
AIN re estate of Stanhope Provost;
attorneys, Hackett-Baker.
3.-Lanston-Chasey VS. Karrick-John-
son; attorneys. Dent-Merillat, Lambert
dorsey VS.. Dorsey; attorneys,
'Brien-Whippler.
5.-Reilly VS.. Reilly; attorneys, Block
Rhodes.
6.-Brosnahan VS. Brosnahan; attor-
neys, Gardiner. Coppinger. Neale-Plum-
ley.
Thomas VS.. Thomas; attorneys
Gardiner. Neale-Lambert
S.-Hin VS.. Hill; attorneys, Miller, Fos-
ter-Stearman.
s.-Sorren VS.. Broun: attorneys, OShea
Maddox
l0.-Dulany VS.. waggaman; attorneys,
Maddox and Gatley-MIllan & Smith
liking VS.. King; attorneys, Hudson
Hendler.
.12.-simonton VS.. simonton; attorney.
Clarke.
13.-Martin VS.. McCarraher; attorneys,
Rosen
A-Hess VS.. Hess; attorneys. Shore
Grindley.
s15.-United States VS.. Cumberland; at
torneys, Classic, Maddox and Galley
Linkins
l6-Minor vs. Minor; attorneys, Long
Scott
H.-KeIey VS.. Kelley; attorney, Jones.
B.-Willis VS.. Willis; attorneys, Ed
ward-Scott.
9.-Lewis VS.. Lewis; attorneys, Mad
dox-DeLacy.
2O.-Meyer VS.. American Security and
Trust Co.; attorneys, Donaldson-Cle-
phane. Hoehling, Peele and Ogilby.
H-Keusch VS.. Lane ct al; attorneys
Hayden. Parker-Vogelsang, Wright.
2.-IIlinois Surety Co. VS.. Fstsmaier;
attorneys, Hinton-Iambert
3.-Davenport vs. Bartlett: attorneys,
Richardson and Wright-DIggs.
4-Clemens VS.. Galliher; attorneys,
Rhodes and Cromelln-Toomey and Too
mey.
S-Somerveu VS.. American Security
and Trust Co.; attorneys. Baker-Don-
sldson.
&.-In re bankruptcy OF ]. William
Henry; attorneys. Wright and wampler
Tucker. Tobriner and Galley.
M-o'Connor VS.. O'Connor; attorneys,
8.-Piper VS.. National, Society D. A. r. ;
attorneys. Hoehling. PeeIle and Ogilby-
Mills, Thompson and Laskey
9-Needharn VS.. Donaldson; attorneys
Tucker, Kenyon and Macfarland - Dar-
hngton, Ridout and Linton.
30.-Connor VS.. Connor; attorneys, Git
ungs and Chamberlain-Darr, Peyser and
koenigsberger.
a--Laster vs. LASER; attorneys, Dut-
ton-Rhodes, Cromelin and Coome.
2-1n re bankruptcy Of Sealed Package
Ice Co; attorneys. Jackson, Taliaferro-
MeriIlat.
3.-Sands VS.. Boyd; attorneys, Dau
and Peyser-Clephane.
a-In re lunacy of B. Chambers; attor-
neys. Cla laggett-Lambert, Owens, Mad
dox.
Sin re estate Of Chadsey; attorneys,
Hudson-Lambert
S-In re estate Of ]. o. Johnston; at
torneys, Hudson-Lambert
d-ln re estate Of Alexander Ruff; at
torneys, Hicks and Hudson-EnSlish.
8--Maass vs.. Wardrnan; ATTORNEYS
Gardiner-Brandenburg