Bisbee daily review., 1916-05-17
JUDGMENT SIGNED IN CUNNINGHAM COSTELLO
 CASE BY THE COURT
Plaintiffs Secure Judgment for Over Hundred Thousand with Interest and Cost of Suit.

TOMBSTONE, May 16.-(SpeciaD- The formal judgment in the case Of Emil Marks, as guardian of tne Gun ningham children, against the Martin Costello estate, has been signed by Judge Lockwood and the judgment entered upon the judgment docket. The judgment calls for the sum of s105,577.55 with interest at per cent tiSm the 26th day of March, 1912, un- til the 20th day of September. 1915, which in round figures makes the amount about $126,000.
 The judgment does not mean any thing, as both parties are not satisfied with the verdict rendered by the jury and on which the judgment was based, and will, therefore, be appealed to the supreme court of the state. The case has now been in the court for several years. At the last trial in February, 1913, a judgment was rem dered for the plaintiffs in the sum of S126, 900, which is about the same as the judgment is now with the inter ests.
 The formal judgment as signed by the court reads as follows: Tt is therefore ordered, adjudged and de creed that the praintiffs recover of and from the defendant the sum of $105,577 together with interest on said sum at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 18th day of March, 1912, until the 20th day Of September, 1915, their costs in this action taxed at the sum of = and one-half of their previous trial of this case, as agreed upon by stipula- tion between the parties hereto at the sum of = and that interest at the statutory rate on judgments commence on September 2Oth, 1915.
 Superior Court.
 Owing to the fact that most of the attorneys in the cases that were to have been set for the criminal term of the superior court beginning the 22nd. were unable to be here, owing to the session of the Federal Court at Tucson requiring their attention; Judge Lockwood in the superior court decided to postpone the May session Of court until about the middle of June, when the Federal Court session will have been completed. The draw ing of the trial jury was had in court however, and the jury will be sub poenaed when the court names the date for appearance, which will be after the 5th of June. The setting of the criminal calendar was also post poned and will be had as soon as the date for the court term is decided.
 In the case of Annie Durkee vs. J. w. Durkee for maintenance and pos session of children, the defendant filed notice of appeal.
 The strangest case probably up be- fore the court for some time was the divorce case of Hattie Farr vs. Ed ward Morris. It seems that Mrs. Farr married Morris under the impression that she had been divorced from her former husband and which she de- clares Morris represented to her as being the case. After her marriage to Morris she discovered that she had not been divorced from her first hus- band and asked the ocurt Tor an an nuument of marriage to Morris. The court granted the petition, and Mrs. Farr will return to her former hus- band.
 III Int CdSt Ol lut 1ltg -NoliOhoi Bank of Fl Paso vs. The Bowie Bank & Trust Company, being a suit for debt arising out of the bank going broke some time ago. judgment was awarded the defendant.
 The case of the Bank Of Douglas vs. the E. P. & $. w., was heard in court today and the matter was taken under 
 Don A. Carpenter has brought suit against the Virginia and Arizona Min ing Company for debt.
 Amelia Ano Chavez has filed an action against Ray B. Krebs to quit title.
 Callentina Molina has filed an ac- tion. for divorce against Migual Molina. Both parties are residents of Tomb stone.