The public ledger. [volume] (Maysville, Ky.) 1913-1968, 1916-03-28
CIRCUIT COURT
March Term Began It's Grind Monday
List Of Grand Jurors For
This Term.

The March term of the Mason Cir
cult Court began its sessions Monday.
Judge G.. ID. Newell presiding.
The grand Jury is composed OF the
following well known gentlemen: X.
A. Carr, foreman; Joseph Davis, w.
II. Boyd, William Fitch, Perry Mastin,
John J. Kahn, Clarence Phillips, John
Roe, r. p. Ray David Chinn, Robert
Burgoyne and George Kreitz.
The petit jury was sworn Tuesday
morning.
Mr.. w. S. Harten, member of the
Floyd county bar, was introduced by
Attorney LeWright Browning and was
admitted to practice at the Mason
county bar.
Master Commissioner A. G. Sulser
produced his financial report, which
was ordered filed. lie also filed his re-
ports on the following cases: Will
liam Brown VS.. Sarah Brown, Charles
A. Anderson on petition, William j.
Wilson's administrator VS.. Freeman
Wilson, Martha N. Janvier on petition
J. B. Russell on petition, Joseph Ennis
on petition, Marie Lane VS.. Nat Lang
horn, Il. +. Herndon VS.. John Marshall
Neptune Fire Company VS.. city OF
Maysville
The mandate of the Court of Appeals
In the case of Davis, etc, vs. the city OF
Maysville, was ordered read and filed
in open court
In the case of T. j. Hall, etc, VS.. G
w. Mcdaniel & Company, C. l.. Wood
trustee of G. w. Mcdaniel & Company,
produced his petition, which was or
dered filed.
In the case of Joseph Lee VS.. the
Bates-Rogers Construction Company
the defendant produced a demurrer,
which was ordered filed
In the case of l.. NJ. Casper VS.. the
Bates-Rogers Construction Company
the defendant produced its demurrer
to the petition and also its petition
and bond for removal of the action to
the United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Kentucky.
In the second case of Joseph Lee vs..
the Bates-Rogers Construction Com
pany, the defendant produced its pc
tition and bond for removal of the ac-
ton to the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of Ken
lucky.
In the case of David Porter VS.. T. A.
Coughlin, etc, the plaintiff produced
his exceptions to the reports of T. A.
Coughlin, executor of J. J. Coughlin,
deceased, which was ordered fled
In the cases of Frank f. Carpenter
VS.. the l.. & N. railroad, and Mrs. Ina
Carpenter vs.. the l.. & n. railroad, the
defendant produced its demurrers,
which we're ordered filed.
A jury trial having been demanded
by the parties named below, thI fol-
lowing cases are set for trial.
Monday, April 3.-Taylor VS.. Muse,
Holton VS.. Ravens; Tuesday, April 4,
Duncan VS.. city of Mayslick. Art Man
ufacturing Company VS.. Collins, ct al. (;
Wednesday, April 5, Mullikin VS.. Rob
inson, Zornes VS.. c. & O.; Thursday,
April 6, Bauer & Klipp VS.. Coils, same
VS.. KEENAN,, Stevens VS.. Cooks ad-
ministrator; Friday, April Z, Warner
VS.. Best, Burgoyne VS.. Brand; We'd
nesday. April II, Clifford VS.. Daugher-
ty; Thursday, April IS, Hendrickson's
administrator VS.. Middleman; Friday,
April IA, Wood VS.. Metropolitan Insur-
ance Company, Piatt VS.. c. & O., Petit
VS.. C. & o.; Monday, April II, Ridg-
ways administrator VS.. c. & o.,
DwightHinkle Company VS.. Mathews
Mason Lumber Company VS.. Raymond;
Tuesday, April IS, Williams admin
istrator VS.. C. G. o., Norris VS.. C. &
o.; Wednesday, April 10, Ekman VS..
Bateman; Thursday. April 20, Grimes
VS.. c. & o., Morrison VS.. c. & o.; Fri
day, April 21, Gates VS.. c. & o., Gill's
administrator VS.. c. & O.. Monday,
April "a, Cincinnati Gas Transporta-
ton Company VS.. Newell, same VS.
Slack, Mackey, Casey and Butcher,
Brooks administrator VS.. Gibson;
Thursday. April q, Reed VS.. Hord
Construction Company; Monday, May
1, American Finance Company VS..
Tice Maysville Ice Company VS..
Morlein Brewing Company, Casper VS..
Bates-Rogers, Lee VS.. Bates-Rogers,
Carpenter VS.. l.. & ~, same VS.. same.