Arizona republican., 1916-10-24
GREY SAYSPLAN IS SOUGHT FUR
 FUTURE PEACE
rRepublloan A. p. Leased wireI

LONDON, Oct 2S.-Another import ant contribution to the discussion of peace was made by Niscount Grey, secretary for foreign affairs. at a lunch given today by the Foreign Press As sociation at which the diplomatic rep reseutatives or an the allied countries were present
 The foreign secretary made il plain that the allies were not prepared to discuss peace terms and gave no indi- cation Of what their terms might be, Dut welcomed any efforts by neutral countries for a commission to prevent future wars. Some of the most inn portant passages of the secretary's speech follow.
 'I would like to talk, not, indeed auout actual conditions of peace, which can only be stated and formulated by the allies together and not by any one %. them separately. but about the gen eral objects which the allies must se cure in this war. And to do that l would ask you to recall that we must never forget how the war came about lf We are to approach peace in prop er spirit it can only be by reccllecting and recalling. and never for a moment forgetting what was the real cause of the war.
 Some people say. Oh we need not ga back over that old ground now; everybody knows it.
 You cannot go back to it too often It affects the conditions of peace. Ger many talks of peace; her statesmen talk of peace today. They say Ger many must have guarantees against leirg attacked again If this war had been forced upon Germany that would re a logical statement It is precisely because it was not forced upon Ger many. but was forced by Germany upon Europe that it is the allies who must have guarantees for future peace.
 Tn July. 1914. no one thought of at farking Germany. It is said that Rus sin was the first to mobilize. That, understand. is what is represented in Germany as justification for the state ueuf that the war was not an aggres- site war on Germany's part but was forced upon her.
 Russia never made the mobilization of which Germany has complained un- tH' after Germany lad refused cor ference. and never made it until after t1e report appeared in Germany that Germany had ordered mO'lill2ouOn and that report had been telegraphed to Ietu1Erud
 The whole plan of campaign of the German staff was attack through Bel rium and now it is reDresented that thev had attacked through Relgmn I.arause other people had planned to attack through Belgium. would like nothing better than to see those state rrents that Russia's mobilization was .- aggressive one and that other pow CTS. any other power. had trafficked n The neutrality of Belgium or planned an attack through Relgium-I would like Co see those statements invesI- gated hefore any independent impar- tIal tribunal
 German organization is very sue cresful in some things. but in nothlnt more successful than in preventing tht truth from reaching their people and tu uresenting to them a point of view which is not that of truth.
 When England proposed confer ence Russia. France and Italy accept cd the conference. And one power re- fused it. When four powers offered ga conference and one power refused ir is it the powers which offer tn conference who are forcing the war ol fs 70 the power that Is refusing it -
 The emperor of Russia offe~ed The Warue tribunal When one sovereign offers The Hague tribunal and another refuses it. is it the sovereign who or fers the conference to The Hagu' which Is forcing war?
 -On the very eve of war France gav' her pledges 10 respect the neutralit, of Belgium if Germany would not vio late it And we asked for suci pledges Was it the power whici asked for a ledge and the powe which gave a pled~e which were re rponsible for the violation of the neu
 fContinued on Page Sevenl