The daily star-mirror. (Moscow, Idaho) 1911-1939, 1916-03-28

There was no question here Of inter
fering in the quarrels of Europe. We
had a right to be neutral. and we were
neutral as to the quarrel between Ger
many and France, but when as al in
cident to the prosecution of that
quarrel Germany broke the law which
we were entitled to have preserved
and which she had agreed with us tc
preserve we were entitled to be heard
in the assertion Of our own national
right.
Neutral Between Right and Wrong!
Yet the American government ac-
guessed in the treatment of Belgium
and the destruction Of the law of ma
lions. Without one word of objection
or dissent to the reputation of law
or the breach of our treaty or the vio-
lation of justice and humanity in he
treatment Of Belgium u government
enjoined upon the people of the United
States an undiscriminating and all en-
bracing neutrality, and the president
admonished the people that they must
be neutralin all respects in act and
word and thought and sentiment. We
were to be not merely neutral as to the
quarrels of Europe, but neutral as to
| the treatment of Belgium, neutral be-
tween right and wrong, neutral be-
tween justice and injustice, neutral be-
tween humanity and cruelty. neutral
between liberty and oppression. Our
government did more than acquiesce.
for in the first Lusitania note, with the
unspeakable horrors of the conquest
of Belgium still fresh in our minds, on
the very day after the report Of the
Bryce commission on Belgian atroci-
ties, it wrote these words to the gov
eminent of Germany:
Recalling the humane and enlightened
attitude hitherto assumed by the imperial
German government in matters OF inter
national right and particularly with re-
gard to the freedom of the seas, having
learned to recognize the German views
and the German influence in the field of
international obligation as always engaged
upon the side of justice and humanity, etc.
And so the government Of the United
States appeared as approving the treat
ment of Belgium. 1t misrepresented
the people of the United States in that
acquiescence and apparent approval.
1t was not necessary that the United
States should go to war in defense
Of the violated law. A single official
expression by the government of the
United States, a single sentence deny
ing assent and recording disapproval
Of what Germany did in Belgium,
would have given to the people of
America that leadership to which they
were entitled in their earnest cropping
for the light. 1t would have ranged
behind American leadership the con-
science and morality of the neutral
world.
1t was not to be. The American
government failed to rise to the de-
mands of the great occasion. Gone
were the old love of justice, the old
passion for liberty, the old sympathy
with the oppressed, the old ideals Of
an America helping the world toward
a better future, and there remained in
the eyes of mankind only solicitude for
trade and profit and prosperity.
Shrank From the Truth. !
The American government could not
really have approved the treatment of
Belgium. but under a mistaken policy
it shrank from speaking the truth.
Such policies as | have described are
doubly dangerous in their effect upon
nations and in their effect at
home. 1t is u matter of universal ex-
.perience that a weak and ~apprehensive
of foreign affairs invites en-
croachments upon rights and leads to
situations in which it is difficult to
prevent war. while a firm and rank
policy at the outset prevents difficult
situations from arising and tends most
to preserve peace. On the
other hand, If a government is to be
in it's diplomacy its W peo-
pie must, be ranged in its support by
leadership Of opinion in a national
worthy to awaken their patri-
)tism and devotion.