Bisbee daily review., 1916-04-14

d6ACCu that tht ittAAtN ut once when the local officials protested against their presence. The War De- partment investigation will clear up how they came 10 enter. Tonight there had been no opportunity for "a canvass in Congress, but it was evi- dent that having unanimously approv- ed by resolution the sending of troops into Mexico for the capture of the Villa bandits. it would sharply oppose the withdrawal without the accam- plishment of their objective. There is now, however, no indication that the Administration has any such inten- tion.
 The President announced when the troops were dispatched that they were sent with the single object of captur- ing Villa and putting a stop to his forays.
 This can and will be done" the President then declared. ''in an en- tirely friendly aid to the constituted authorities in Mexico. and with re- spect for the sovereignty of that re- public"
 There was no indication tonight lidl tnt l.du NhdhStu hAS mind.
 The first impression of General Carranza's note in many quarters was that it merely opened the way to a discussion of the adIisability of with drawing the troops, passing the suS- gestion on a statement of facts as they appeared to Carranza officials It does not specifically request, or de mand. the withdrawal of the forces Some officials were inclined to be lieve that General CarranZa had found it necessary to take steps to assure his countrymen that he was safe guarding the sovereignty of his coun try in every possible way. pro longed diplomatic discussion was look ed for with no serious embarrassment of the pursuit of the bandits. The Parral affair, however, intro duces a more serious aspect. In his message transmitting the reports General Carranza uses stronger terms i although avoiding, as does his note i language that can be construed a: more than an argument supporting his urgent opinion that the troops be re called.
 i The Carrsnza embassy issued thi following statement after the note anC telegrams had been placed in Secre tary Lansing's hands: { "Eliseo Arredondo, ambassador de signate from the Mexican government at Washington, .voicing the sentiment of MT. CarranZa. called at the Depart ment of State this afternoon to e' press MT. Carranza's sincere regre for the occurrence in Parral betweei American troops and the people 0 ! the city, thus showing that the lament ! able incident was the result of thu : mistake of the American commando
 in entering the city, contrary to th' .. instructions of his government. Thi can be easily seen from the telegram | submitted by MT Arredondo to tn
 Secretary of State"
 The official text of the ncte sigrei
 by Secretary Aguilar. made publi
 here tonight, shows various differ ences in language from the unofficial
 version published today. In severa
 instances terms of the translations a
 given by the State Department is nor
 diplomatic. In substance, however
 the texts are the same and prescn
 the argument that the Americai
 troops should be withdrawn froT
 Mexico as they had been sent on misunderstanding by the State Dc
 partment of the attitude of the d
 facto government.
 There is one marked difference. | citing reasons for the proposal for tn
 withdrawal of the American troops the official text shows that language And because this expedition is no fulfilling it's object and undobutedi
 cannot do so, because the band head
 ed by Villa already has been dispers | ed" the unofficial text says the eN petition has fulfilled it's object in
 solar it would be able to do SO. The basis of this suggestion that dis taken up. however. appears to rest ol a note sent by Secretary Lansing ol
 April 3. transmitting a counter draf ! of the terms of the protocol coverini a reciprocal agreement for the pursui
 of bandits by one country beyond tn
 border of the other under certain con
 ditions. Attached to that communl
 cation. the note states, was state ment by Secretary Lansing sayln;
 that the United States goyernmen