The Washington herald., 1916-11-25
COURT PROCEEDINGS
4 Supreme Court, District Of Columbis
Equity Division No. =
Iu.fiee stafford.

Justice stafford.
Anderson vs. Anderson; rule as to con-
tempt returnable December l; plalntin
attorneys, r. r. Horner and Z. H. jack
son; defendants attorneys, Edmund Car
rington, r. p. Evans and Isaac r. Hit
Harsha vs. Cross; decree appointing
Hugh A. Thrift substituted trustee;
plaintiffs attorney. George B. Fraser:
Howarth VS.. Ferguson; decree appoint
ing trustee; plaintiffs attorney, 5. X
Bond
KiIlian VS.. Killian: order making party
defendant; plaintiffs attorney. w. ].
Lambert; defendants attorneys, Bran
denburg and Hawken & Havell.
In re the unclaimed baggage; order
authorizing sale of unclaimed baggage;
attorneys, Hamilton & Hamilton.
In re lunacy Of Frank Healy; order al
lowing Investments; attorneys ID. w.
Baker and C. W. Darr.
Whedon VS.. the Fussen Ice Cream
Company: decree establishing lien on
personality for rent: plaintiffs attorneys,
Douglas, Ruffin & Obear; defendants at
torney, C. II. Syme.
Lincoln VS.. American Security and
Trust Company: order allowing amend
ment OF bill; plaintiffs attorneys, d. 7.
Wright and T. NJ. Wampler; defendants
attorney. J. V. Hayden.
Sampbell VS.. Sampbell; rule continued
TO December 1; plaintiffs attorney, Jabez
Lee; defendants attorney, ]. H. Stewart.
J. Carey King VS.. ]. Carey King Com
pany; order appointing Walter c. Bal
derston and Crandal Mackey ancillary
receivers: bond 5000: plaintiffs attorney,
Crandal Mackey
Yoder VS.. Stephenson; order confirming
report of auditor; plaintiffs attorneys,
J. J. Mcmahon and John Ridout.
In re lunacy of John w. Thompson;
order approving report Of auditor.
In re lunacy of Hugh C. Christian; ref
erence to the auditor.
45l3-In re lunacy of James A. Pope;
auditors report approved.
Bray VS.. Bray; rule as to maintenance
returnable December l; plaintiffs attor-
neys. Wright & Wampler and Bertram
Emerson, jr.
Page vs. Lane; order noting and allow
ing an appeal; plaintiffs attorney, E. c.
Hanford: defendants attorneys, c. E.
Wright and c. D. Mahaffie.
Long VS.. Long: rule as to alimony
pendente lite. counsel fees and costs re-
turnable December 1; plaintiffs attorney,
Clinton Robb.
Layten VS.. Reside; order for security
for costs: plaintiffs attorneys, w. c.
Martin and W. ]. Lambert: defendants
attorneys, Barnard & johnson.
Endres vs.. Endres: order reducing ali
mony; plaintiffs attorneys, o. A. Phelps
and VI. N. Richardson; defendants at
torney. ]. A. Burkhart.
White VS.. White; order for payment OF
counsel fee and costs; plaintiffs attor-
ney. l. G. Grossman; defendants attor-
ney, G. H. Macdonald.
Poston VS.. P. H. Patterson Company:
order sustaining motion to dismiss in
tervening petition with leave to amend
within five days: plaintiffs attorneys,
Ralston & Richardson: defendants at
torneys. John Ridout and L B. Perkins.
Yates vs.. Yates; order overruling mo-
tion to dismiss with leave to answer In
ten days: plaintiffs attorney, T. C. Tay-
lor: defendants attorneys Leckie, Cox
& Kratz and T. II. Patterson.
Mason VS.. Zantzinger: order continuing
motion to December s. with leave to
amend bill; plaintiffs attorney, T. L.
Jones; defendants attorneys, C. v. I'm
lay and G. W. Onutt.
Jones vs. Jones: order for alimony
pendente lite; plaintiffs attorneys.
Wright & WampIer; defendants attor-
ney. F. E. Mitchell.
Kelly VS.. Kelly: order discharging rule
without prejudice; PLAINTIFFS attorneys.
T. Fl. Patterson and W. C. Ashford de-
fendant's attorney. NJ. C. O'Brien.
; Assignment for Monday, November q,
1916:
5I-New York Life Insurance Company
VS.. Bond Building Company; attorneys,
McKenney & Flannary-Ellis & Donald
son, Sinclair, ct al
SUnion Saving Bank VS.. Moriarty, ct
al; attorneys, McLanahan. Burton and
Culbertson-Moriarty. Columbus
I+Burgdorf vs. Edwards; attorneys.
Gardiner-Ridout, Edwards
D-Solomon VS.. Solomon, ct al; at
, torneys, c. W. Tignor-H. L. Tignor
2-Stose VS.. Hight, ct al: attorneys,
Wilson-Hogan, Douglas, Ruffin and
Obear.
+Newbold VS.. Brennan Construction
Company: attorneys. Cohen, Hogan
Sullivan, Hamilton.
26-Credit Clearing House vs. National
Credit Clearing House: attorneys. Hay
den-Collins
2S-Wedderburn VS.. Moore, ct al; at
tCrneys; Burke. Hufty-Minor.
- 1-2-National Metropolitan Bank VS..
Richards, ct al; attorneys; Ralston ana
RtchardsOn-Lewin. NARROW. Tucker and
Kenyon, O'Donoghue ct al
A-Moxley VS.. Burrell, ct al; attorneys,
: Martin, Ridout-Plumley.
S-Chatard VS.. District National Bank;
attorneys. Tucker. Northumberland
and Johnson. Lester
Swans VS.. Evans, ct al; attorneys,
WhippleT-Connelly.