The Appeal. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn. ;) 1889-19??, 1916-03-18
7eak against the aggression of the

weak against the aggression of the
strong.
To this people the invasion of Bel.
g1um brought a shock of amazement
and horror. If the public opinion of the
world was to remain silent upon that,
neutral upon that, then all talk about
peace and justice and international law
and the rights Of man, the progress of
humanity and the spread of liberty is
idle patter, mere weak sentimentality:
then opinion is powerless and brute
force rules and will rule the world. If
no difference is recognized between
right and wrong then there are no
moral standards. There come times in
the lives of nations as Of men when to
treat wrong as If it were right is trea-
son to the right.
The Wrong Done to Belgium.
The American people were entitled
not merely to feel, but to speak con-
corning the wrong done to Belgium.
1t was not like interference in the in
ternal affairs Of Mexico or any other
nation, for this was an international
wrong: The law protecting Belgium
which was violated was our law and
the law Of every other civilized coun-
try. That law was the protection of
our peace and security. It was our
safeguard against the necessity of
maintaining great ornaments and
wasting our substance in continual
readiness for war. Moreover. that Law
was written into a solemn and formal
convention, signed and ratified by Ger
many and Belgium and France and the
United States in which those other
countries agreed with us that the law
should be observed.
There was no question here Of inter-
fering in the quarrels of Europe. We
had right to be neutral, and we were
neutral as to the quarrel between Ger
many and France, but when as an in
cident to the prosecution Of that
quarrel Germany broke the law which
we were entitled to have preserved
and which she had agreed with US to
preserve We were entitled to be heard
In the assertion Of our own national
right.
Neutral Between Right and Wrong!
Yet the American government &C.
guessed in the treatment of Belgium
and the destruction of the law Of ma
lions. Without one word Of objection
or dissent to the reputation of law
or the breach Of our treaty or the vio-
lation Of justice and humanity in the
treatment of Belgium our government
enjoined upon the people of the United
States an undiscriminating and all en-
bracing neutrality, and the president
admonished the people that they must
be neutral in all respects In act and
word and thought and sentiment We
were to be- not merely neutral as to the
quarrels Of Europe, but neutral as to
the treatment Of Belgium, neutral be.
tween right and wrong, neutral be-
tween Justice and injustice, neutral be-
tween humanity and cruelty, neutral
between liberty and oppression. Our
government did~more than acquiesce,
for In the first Lusitania note, with the
unspeakable horrors of the conquest
Of Belgium still fresh In our minds, on
the very day after the report Of the
Bryce commission on Belgian atroci.
ties, it wrote these words to the gov
eminent of Germany:
Recalling the humane and enlightened
attitude hitherto assumed by the imperial
German government in matters Of inter-
national right and particularly with re-
gard to tho freedom Of the seas having
learned to recognize the German views
and the German influence in the field of
international obligation as always engaged
upon the side Of justice and humanity. etc.
Andso the government Of the United
States appeared as approving the treat
ment of Belgium. It misrepresented
the people Of the United States in that
acQu1escence and apparent approval.
It was not necessary that the United
States should 60 to war In defense
Of the violated law. A single official
expression by the government of the
United States, single sentence deny
ing assent and recording disapproval
Of what Germany did in Belgium,
would have given to the people of
America that leadership to which they
were entitled in their earnest cropping
for the light. It would have ranged
behind American leadership the con-
science and morality Of the neutral
world. g..
It was not to be. The American
government failed to rise to the de-
mands Of the great, occasion. Gone
were the old love OF justice, the old
passion for liberty, the old sympathy
with the oppressed, the old ideals Of
an America helping the world toward
a better future, and there remained In
the eyes of mankind only solicitude for
trade and profit and prosperity.
shrank From the Truth.
The American government could not
really have approved the treatment Of
Belgium, but under a mistaken policy
it shrank from speaking the truth.
Such policies as have described are
doubly dangerous in their effect upon
foreign nations and In their effect at
home. It Is matter of universal ex-
perience that weak and apprehensive
treatment Of foreign affairs invites en-
croachments upon rights and leads to
situations in which 1t is difficult to
prevent war, while firm and frank
policy at the outset prevents difficult
situations from arising and tends most
strongly to preserve peace. On the
other hand, If government is to be
strong in its diplomacy it's own peo-
pie must be ranged in it's support by
leadership Of opinion in a national
cause worthy to awaken their patri-
otism and devotion.