Pine Bluff daily graphic., 1916-04-13

Mrs. Jenkins lying upon the bed
 shorty y aftcrWard, he met Bradbury emerging from the restaurant. After "l'hesS had partaken of lunch, he re- turned to the Jenkins store and ob- served Bradbury coming out the room m which he had seen Mrs. Jenkins.
 ihe defendant pulled down his vest
 The door was aiar, and he moved
 closer to peeek as a1afnan will .lu ' lie said he saw Mrs. Tenkins. appar- ently completely clothed. pick up a white garment and don it. He had met Jenkins in the morning. and tl,a planter told witness he was bound for Pine Bluff. R..
 ReplylnS to Attorney Rogers, tbe witness said il was true he continued to sell oil to Mr. Jenkins and ,tat he regarded Jenkins as his friend, and that he had not told the planter of this incident. q was afraid to tell him, as you would have been if you had been acquainted with him." Hoover said to Rogers. "He was cranky about his wife" Witness said defendants vest appeared closed, lie did not examine to ascertain if if was buttoned "all the way Witness re- iterated he saw Mrs. Jenkins dor the undersarment, but did not know whether it was doffed between the time he first saw her. Mr Easley was in the store at the time, witness stated. He didn't know if there were customers in the place. Witness could not say if the door from the room into the store was open or closed. He knew there Was such a door,
 While Attorney Rogers was ques- tioning Hoover about the location of the door and where witness stood, Hoover accused Rogers of endeavor- ing to alter the position of pencil mark witness made on the diagram to indicate his position on the day un- der discussion and made the declara- tion that he ought to kick" the at torney in the face. This provoked the court to scold Hoover and to call a halt to the examination, Judge Sor- rells stating that the witness had made the point perfectly clear.
 Bringing in Letters.
 Sheriff Williams was put on the stand to identify a letter taken from Rradbulys trunk. and to tell the jury about procuring the papers. Attorney Rogers wanted to ask witness ques- tions to show the trunk had been op- ened without warrant or court or der, and the key to the pOstoffice box taken without Bradbury's permission, to lay the basis for an exception to the admission of the letters, etc. Judge Sorrells said the exception would be Overruled, the question having been passed upon when the petition for the return of the papers was denied Mir. Rogers was anxious to get the uues- tions into the record, so Prosecuting Attorney Parham propounded queries, giving Sheriff Williams opportunity to state that he was not armed with warrant or court order when he pro- cured the trunk and key to postoffice box. Defendant claims that his rights under the constitution were violated, but the court declined' to inquire into the methods employed in obtaining the evidence.
 J. c. Denny, clerk at the Jefferson hotel. identified signature on the hotel register as having been written by Bradbury, and Frank Milner, placed on the stand as an expert. declared that the signature to letter and that on the hotel register were written by the same person.
 Before giving the letter to the jury, the state desired to have Postmaster testify. MT. Wilbourne had not been notified to be in court at that hour, and the matter was de- layed Attorney Rogers pleaded ill., ness, and the night session was aban- doned