American Falls press. [volume] (American Falls, Idaho) 1907-1937, 1915-01-07

Cases Filed for the Term Beginning Monday
January IL.

Criminal Gases on the District Court Calendar for the January, 1915 Term.
case No 3 ., IS STATE state. Of Of, Idaho IDAHO VS. s.. Waiter W, r aass'. n Msss%ss"Sl [ssst'sss,ns,
Case No To- 'smsts s,s,o of Il Idaho 1%,S vs. VI Victor 9a. rete Es3 ct Grand as p astsssy st.r.e
stealing -. :, un. nu,, x.n, ,.-,..v c,o-.. .,..rn,,
Z Case No l52-state Of Idaho vs. Lee sioddard' Felony Horsesteaing)
; Case q Nc. IS iss state STAT % OF idaho Idaho s. James NJ Hsssard. Perjury
10 Case No. l55- State of Idaho vs.. George eMarin. Felony
IL Case No 1862 state of Idaho 49, Henry Reeves Mhdemeanor CfIorse
At least tire emore criminal cases not yet filed.
CIVIL CASES
! Case %e % s Ana @@S' Fails is Development D d "%a Co on" VS. American i Fails power
3 Case No IN. Schmidt VI Am. Falls Power Co, Injunction and Eqi
4 Case No s-Monroe G Kepnser VS. Geo. Bradley & Julia Bradley, In
s Case No. conrad Kissierr VS. oregon Short Line r R,Damags.
8 Case No lot J. St John VS. American Falls Power Co, ct al, Damages
. Case v = loren lam%sry vs. Iva Hammer %zL nlyor, e. ,,un
; Case No so--conrad KIsler vs. , 3 connt ct al, Recovery Of oamages
IL Case No, 2s-southern Idaho Water Power Co, VS. American Falls De-
IL Case No. BINARY l. Burke 6 Mabel Burke vs. Southern Idaho Water
10 Case No. a4-Pony NJ Richardson ct al, VS.. American Falls Power Co,
Z Case 70 . Thg p c EIs,n , rs Lice c, Al. Soa, ct a al; cc a%s T raSm,..,on.
:. Power County; Respondent Appeal From mo- Order eo of Commissioners 10 1,.
II Case No ss-idaho Lumber Co VS. Michael Mayer & Fred Jpskie Fore
9 Case No 40 Roy L. Hartley s Jennie Har4sy. Divorce
% Case No si-soathern Idaho Water Power Co. vs. 4 H. TarSet, condem-
q Case No. 45-E. J. Twomey vs. Southern Idaho Water Power Co, Tenn
"a Case No as-Freda a Sparks VS. Southern Idaho Water Power Co, Tenn
Is '' cass No o" as"wa,er Sparks VS. Southern Idaho Water Power Co. TEN
"a Case No. so Southern Idaho Water Power Co. 49, Mary L. Burke & Ma
% Cas No ID Southern Idaho water Power 90 VS. WaherS Sparks, rus
ss Case No 55~ southern Idaho Water Power Co, VS. Walter Sparks Con
81 Case No 90 southern Idaho Water Power Co, vs.. Z. J. rwomen. Con-
IS Case No No 81 al q Miles n, VS. Leader L srI 1,@ gGs T. Co., nseqve ec,% of Debt.
20 Case No 10 Mile Link Is Andrew stroh ct al, Recovery IN Note.
20 Case No IS Geo Tussing VS. Mary L. A. Maxwell ct al, Foreclosure of
IS Case No 70 Geo, Walter vs.. Conrad g Mary Ksslor, Appeal from Justice
:. Case No 81 Herman Rugp = Elizabeth 4 R9np. Divorce.
70 Case No oi-Edwu L. Harvey VS. Western water Co. ct al Accounting
" Case No ios-n 7 Morris rs Mark Buck ct al Appeal from Justice
rs Case No 10 Ran River Land 6 Live stock Co VS. $ II Laird, Appeal
70 Case No i2 Anna Walton al Guardian VS.. r. e Walton.
10 Case No i1a Edward ouinlan VS. l. A skeen 6 Margaret skeen, Tnjunc-
II Case No III Sarah e Fitzpatrick VS. chster l. Fitzpatrick, Divorce
" Cas- No ne Noah p Trumbo vs. 7 . 81 John ct A.. Recovery of Debt
"a Case No us Henry Rock vs. James osburn & A W cOnover, Recovery
IS Cas- No ls cla" audcen vs. Frank KlucE. Appeal from Justice Court
80 Case No 800 Security Title & Trust co, Trustee, IS Western Water Co,
" Case No, 12l Ludwig HoGcr III, ct al VS.. A. IL Ayortn Machinery co..
IS Cas- No County COMMISSIONS Power County, vs., W II Zimmerman.
10 Case No i2a- County Commissioners Power County, vs.. l. A sNccn &
Narearet sE"en Injunction and DAMAGES.
% Cosc No l5 FRANK nmt" VS. Eva lioston divorce
p Case No l2' Joseph A. Brown vs. Mary NJ nutorncld ct al, Recovery
3 Case No ne-w H. Peck vs. Robert l. Gvms. cl al. Recovery of pobt
a csc No 800 -cnoa H. Baker ct al, va / Case Tnrcsnns Machine CO..
8 e Goss No No @n 10 A% ( r p rls5sS% ., y > jg i N Tsss :, Ct & al" o G% 4 T'~
i case No 1879 Vim Burke, Jr, VS. l. W. Douc Quiet ride
- Case No l$i Power County VS. John Reddy, Condemnation
80 Case NO lse Holt Manufacturing 60 VS. John NJ Crowley. Foreclosure
: ! Case 20 - -L ,sS,y w a Sa Us !, James ncn n I M SoH,i nSoG S%g, of wasSs
"a Csc No 1884 John u Isaac VS. steve yaucm, Recovery Of pebt
: SsS No ' a. IPSSSt ii ' Z Sp"sn VS. S', vs southern 8 a%sT"f ian D'S water Power
9 Case No las NJ schmidt VS. southern Idaho water Power Co. Damages
: Case csss Ne ES isS-s s y 5b%s VS. n ava ~ i. 8 s% q R, Gt al aa @sSoysry q on SN Soto
$ Case No li laey NcrcromSic VS. Lee t6crcromSiS' Divorce
. Case 70 'lse y i Harms vs. J p Isaac. Appeal from Probate Court
. Case No i5s lonnie prothoro vs. Frank NJ rrohcro, divorce
q Case No leo Power County VS.. state Of Idaho, condemnation
% e%e No W iSs -i So Lumber L"@%Sr Co % IS, Marion NJ T Wade Wade c c oa'S waSe 81 q N T% Smith
wooGy, Foreclosure Mortgage.