Norwich bulletin., 1915-02-27
ECCLES WILL TO SUPREME COURT
Will go There Technical Question of Proper Form of Pleadng-Man Question of Construction of Rock Nook Home Legacies Not Affected-Must Be Settled in Further Legal Proceedings

not the Rock Nook Home can take the | legacies of about S230,000 mentioned in the will. That vital question, it Is said by competent lawyers, will have to be raised and decided in some other legal proceedings to be brought in the future
 William H. Shields appeared before the court representing William B. Ec. cles and Arthur M. Brown appeared representing the executors of the will Co.
 Foreclosures.
 The Savings Bank of New London was granted judgment of foreclosure on four mortgages on property owned by Ricardo R. Morgan and others in this city The mortgages amount to $3,25451, s64S.15, $3,903.92 and S1, 94O.3o. The first three mortgages were on property consisting of dwell ing houses in Connecticut avenue, Ash craft road and the last in Broad street The judge set April 1 as the date for redemption.
 Other short calendar matters were disposed of as follows:
 The case of Strickland vs City of New London, motion for permission to amend compleaint and Town of Lis bon vs. Wolf, ct al, ruling on motions to strike out part of answer, were postponed
 An answer was ordered filed by March 5 in the divorce case of Thomp son vs. Thompson or it will go on the uncontested list.
 An amendment was filed in the case of PaVey vs. Pavey.
 The case of Twomey vs. Flynn, ct al, that clerk be directed to enter judgment of non-suit for failure to comply with order of court in accord ance with rules of court, was post poned.
 The case of Matteson. ct al, trustees vs. Nameaug Boat club, was assigned for trial March IS.
 The receivers supplementary ac- count and final judgment was ap- proved in the case of Buckley, ct al. vs. Sterling Machine Go. Assignment of Cases. Cases were assigned as follows: Tuesday. March 2-Snow, ct al, vS l Weidner, Manuel J. Sousa vs H. R Douglas. Inc. Mary Balestrini vs. city of New London.
 Friday, March 5-Morgan vs. Hunt ington, ct al.
 Tuesday. March 9-Carlos Barry vs lgF'ields S Pendleton, Arthur H. Fol- som vs. Louis Donovan. Tuesday. March 16-John F. Gran ey vs. John Donovan The case of James F. Fenton ct al. vs Fenton Building c., was assigned for trial before Judge Milton A i Shumway in Norwich, Wednesday i March, as a court case.
 Decree of Divorce Granted. Alice Selma Conant was granted g l divorce from Frank E. Conant on the grounds of intolerabie cruelty. The 1 case was continued from last week tC i furnish evidence. Friday morning Mrs Conant testified that on the night she l left her husband he came home tc supper and while she was sitting or the veranda with her infant son he 1 called vile name and struck her. al the same time ordering her to cut him a piece of pie. He was intoxicated as usual. After finishing his supper i he directed her to leave the house ,ac- companying the order with paths anc blows. She left the next morning anC | went to Stonington, where she has l lived with her sister. Her testimony was corroborated by a Mrs. Morse. who 1 was a neighbor and chanced to be al i the houSe on the night in question 1 The plaIntif has a son Is years of agt i and the court directed that he could l choose his own guardian.