The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1915-06-19
MACHINERY.
FOR SALE-MOTOR-30 n. P,
235 VOLTS-12O AMPS.-325
REV. ALSO EXTRA IMMATURE.
APPLY BOX l22. SUN OFFICE.
APPELLATE COURT DECISIONS.
Complete List Handed Down By
First Department Division.

First Department Division.
The following decisions we're handed
yesterday by the Appellate Di-
First Department:
Henry L. Dixey. respondent. vs. 4 II.
Judement and order arirmsd With costs
su aTma e. w'G a.. Hs,pone.S;.. s'ss Il.
Colonial Bank and Dry Dock savings In
s m.h, %os tmR.i' a. di rec sd'P GS opinion su saa
as modified affirmed with costs to both
appellants against respondents. Opinion
Emma e wickenhti..r. as genera
guardian. &c. respondent, We the German
ESShans n nsns ana un,on sfssr. s. JTuiSs.
nent modified as directed in opinion and
as modified affirmed with eo,is 70 both
DfSoywii3s. J se',ie order on notice,
Frank Zak. appellant. vs.. william simp,
s9T; rs'PoSdfs, Judgment T, S e srp aqi
- abide event. Opinion BY bowling. J.
william De Long ct al appellants, vs.
sponAen'. order affirmed, with SO cosls
and disbursements. with leave 10 piain'irs
counter cain on m % cost, In mi.
court and IN the court below Opinions by
scot; and Hotchkiss. u order h.ed.
The reop,e. &c. respondent - charles
Y TohelWes~er. appellant. Judgment az
nrmed opinions F scott and lowing
Alfred g Dale. plaintiff. VS.. Guaranty
Trus, company Of New YORK, as trustee.
S. defends1' Judsmen; directed tor
without, costs opinion by bowling. J.
set'.e order on notice.
peIaut. vs. the CITY OF Nev York. resnou-
dent. judgment. IN SO far a. ~ d'snisses
merated IN opinion. reversed and a new
rial ordered as 20 the same. with costs to
arpe'.an' % ABIDE event opin'on by Dow
vulcan pc'inu!ng Company, respondent
appellant; vs. Frank A. Assman e; al.
, o2Fsr 5siIm. 60 on s.,esss n,: ssSssi' sa,
modlned on plaintiffs appeal by denying
motion TO require, particulars as TO the
modified Affirmed, with so costs and dis
nnrsements 20 Plaintiff. No opinion. Set
Henry /" sprasus. respondent. We. will
Jam : WEBB and Dominion secu!!;!e.
C.mpany appellant. Juisrntrt r@.v.rset
costs - Defendant Webb. as against plain
IN og.a!on by Scott. J. Settle order on
James W Howard. appellant v. The
CITY ~ New York. respondent. order az
armed with SO costs and dlsbursemenj..
Tn People, etc. r~espondent. We. R.n1a-
U!u Thomas appellant Judgment re
r.ci a"I new uisl grantei Opinion by
Daniel lgHatovlt2. appellant, VS.. B.nja-
min N'rhe.nHsky 81 a., respondtnts. JudF-
ment and .rder Alarmed with costs. No
Teresa N porneiy, as anc.iary .xecu-
ir.y c'rs apr.,ant VS. II G ana 4 /
+. iio" 1' q m s-'% sR Ts:'' 90 p I 95iy' P.y
~ ''rner opinion OF Laush.in. J. order
.p' A5... TG v & IS 'f f6is. N:% ha :;S, . rsi
H't'''ri Railroad 90, appellant. Judr-
men, and orh.r starmed With costs No
Allied SIX Mlnufaotures, Inc. app.l.
Laws. v5, Leopold E'ste!n. ct a.. respond.
s,... op.niou by SCOTT, J order n.i
a,lH s ,aG Hm as,,aSn, G c]@.l apr.ian,' J MGs.
mem ana or3er affirmed with eos's No
WHITE and sons. responder, Judgment
affirmed with costs. No opinion. order
Leonard Pan'son E, a., respondent. vs.
Judgment ana order affirmed with costs.
NO opinion. order nie1.
John j Wash Q, a. appellants Jutg
mn, nod 2rier affirmed with costs no
Albert ) Schirmer, an infant, etc, re-
sp"n 'rn' ~ ortei parker inp!eafet,
rr~"1 with costs. No opinion. order
In the Matter OF Public Service. Com
mission re premises - Mott svenp. ana
East l2>th street order affirmed with
50 cost, ont t'.nursemen's 80 opinion
/ ,Sr0t' y, dissenting. order fed.
People eN re-. Eugene X. Pommer, APP
- chant. " Henry X Thompson, as Com.
n,.-s..p"r etc, ,rsponaen,. Order. sfhfm-
Mtr' = GIru"y, respondent. W. The
mca, and o- GsS Affirmed G2r srP %is cos. Jug,
I opinion order Med,
EIw,rd Gurrey, vs., SANE Judgment
ana %ri.r affirmed with costs, No oF!n-
A'eyani., ; William. a. Trustees in
'art Jgarmer' modified as directed IN
orir''n ari Ms modified affirmed wi'hov,
costs. Opinion ny Clarke. J Settle order
W..iam L Toungm.n, spH.il.nr:Ie.pon;
o. Va Fid.,',y : ptpS,., COMPANY OF
Msni AHMED Win costs TO p.a'n'in ~
Metropolitan Tru., Company % the CITY o,
Nov YORK. as stm!rlst-a'or appellant
Judgement and order affirmed win costs
n.'seu.!ng, opinion BY Mclaughlin. J
Nieo'e, Corl,o, respondent. Va Brad.
Contracting COMPANY, appellant JudG
mont and crdar affirmed with costs NJ
orlnion. (Clarke. j. d!ssenting) ordel
s.mns! Ericsson ~ .am,ni',y.son a.
! company, respondent, judgment aNlrinet
with costs No opinion. order nied.
carlton Illustrators, Inc, appellant vs.
American Locomotive Company, respon
Dent. Judgment reversed and new tria
granted, WIN costs 20 appellant, to abba
event opinion by SCOTT. J order rled
In 'hs matter ~ Mary MoAfanam-a, de-
ceased Decree affirmed with costs, y,
opinion. Orter hleH.
dents, vs. Aio'ph /. R'su, as CITY Marshal
Sc, anrr!'tur. order amending v,rfic
uy att.HF interest reversed. with $40 cost
art r!sA4rssW-us; Judgment nodded b,
striking th-rctrom tho interest on M
,"r1ic' ana az so modified affirmed with
u3t costsi order denying motion for a new
TRIAL affirmed, No op'nion. Settle ords
ON Notice.
RAYMOND Dunn. appellant, vs. McMull.n
snare Tri"st, lnG.. respondent, Ord.
arrwed with costs, No opinion, ords
Nod
RI. CITY OF New York. sppsnanI ',
Etpar :. Aprleby 81 a., individually an
o.. executors, Sc, respondents Julkrer
reversed, with costs, and Judgment 81
reo'od IN fay9r 81 P'sin!,n With costs
S,w- v. Ssms, imp'-saed, 40 Jud,
B. ~ ~rvc-crI. Win costs, and tuAr ~ en-
air-y'el IN favor ~ piaintir, with co.'.
!, Drir'uu Is Scott. J Sr'' order on NOTICE
TIE People. Sc, respondent, Us, Durto
" Gibson. appellant Judgment an.rnet
: 80 opinion. order tlc1
, Santi Amoroso, respondent. W, the Fru'
Auction Company, appellant Juigmen
and order affirmed with costs. No opinior
"a