The Hawaiian gazette., 1915-01-26

- - ~ a - . - I
j was at liberty 10 serve as guardian
al Item fer the minor, il appointed;
that I had said that wasI that / had
inquired Of Mr., Thompson whether the
report IN the newspapers that the child
was LIE nothing by the will was cor.
rect, and upon his replying in the af-
firmatiye hal further inquired Of him
whether he appreciated that my .he1
.eeptanee Of the appointment as guard
ian a1 Item would Mt once place me
in position Of utter hostility TO him
ami his firm and 10 the father Of the
minor, and that Mr.. Thompson had
answered, I'VE apptcciatc that, gi
Preferred Perry to Any Other
"Jndge Frear said that II any soiIt;
side attorney or 'outsider or any.
body from the outside II do not re-
call the precise form of his expressioT)
was 10 be guardian ad Item they a
think that the word he used was we
would rather have me appointed to the
office than anY one else, and that they
all thought highly Of me. The fact
Of the pendeney of the three proeeesl'
pings In this general litigation, one the
suit ON Hawaii for guardianship Of the
person OF the minor, one brought BY
the minor for administration of his
mothers estate and the above entitled
cause, was referred to. &.'.N 3. .p5
IAN for Child's Sake g. = .Ief
Gle said that they (hc was nat
speaking of himself alone, but whether
he used the word I'VE or mentioned
by name his firm and that Of Holmes,
Stanley & Olson and Mr.. W. A. Kin
ney, L cannot now say with certainty
II at the time understood him to refer
TO those two firms and Mr.. Kinney
Int that understanding may possibly
at that moment have been based
upon what I had read in the news
Iiapers) had already done at Mrs
IN the matter; that they and Mrs
Knight had done il all for the child Z
benefit (meanipg the minor therein);
that they wanted to see the child !
interests properly protected in the pro
bate Ecset( meaning the above entitled
canse), and that he or they II do moi
recall which, wondered or wanted
to know Q do not. recall the exaci
form in which the question was intro
tluced, hut in Substance II was an in
CURRY or giving 10 me of an oppor
ltunity TO state) whether ARRANGE
ments' could be mace for the tasso
! citation Of ourselves (to the best o.
my recollection ourselves was thu
word he used, but 1t may have beer
some other WORD or phrase ihuieatlv'
~ 3he attornegs Wnhoin ne nan pee
feterring to- Win me ms GUARDIAN u
Item Tor the projection OF me child [
interests, 80 %. e
4 Wouip MAKE no r.onases =.
i replled That deemed u 70 p
Inconsistent with my duty TOWARDS IN
eh1d anu win my duty toWaraS .n'
I CONT that appointed me 70 AZ TIM
Hme enter INTO any agreement or mas
any promise or statement as 70 whetne
/ would employ or associate Win In'
an we ease, any other atforneS ior ~
tt9rheSs' or as 70 s"hetnertl gWouiu en-
ESy % o. aSsoelate via we ny .niill Q .,
MT. oIson 8 hrm or MI. Kinney or a.
aof them; that my feelings lows rds ~
nSm ana us members anu TOWARDS Al
gSohs nrm app ITS ineihrers we're y
| - -, u 49, 60 - u Al
eeu'd pot tHeh say e0nsis.ehtiy WI =, =
my duly as ! UNDERWOOD ~ Wnethe
i w,9uld employ lor assoslate wth ~
4 sy one or more or AZ 9r hem
MT hlhhey; that ! might ao 30 an
shht 4 might mol 20 ~ that ! ma
npd no lime TO give the matter an
\ Consideration ana mad moi eoneiuded
my own MIND whether "ouia elhP =,
any attVrheys 10 ana me, o., u y ue
wtlom ! WOULD empley.. @.
Il CORNER scoVernOr on UAgEessins -,
4 eJ.upge fFeaT sad that we were u
1 gresslng Pr ! IePned tnat as III
| ucrstood MN that was exactly whatfh
wanted 70 know. 4 also sam that
he,1uege frear, or has assoc iates .fei
tnal ior any reason my aPpolnt@en
~ RpaLolah al lltela sll9iliq DC feSoAe'
i YOU meaning Ig Judge FIeaI or MS a.
u s9clatep couia make aPp ll