The sun., 1915-03-27
APPELLATE COURT DECISIONS.
complete List Handed Down by
First Depa rtment DivisiOn.

The following decisions were handed
down Yesterday by the Appellate DlVi-
sion. First Department
Madison Trust company. respondent. vs.
G!rnesie Trust SompanA A,.d ct a. dippninion
and ~ modihed affirmed. without cos.s
ppiuions 10y HoichkisS and scott JJ" ana
lHgraham. T.. y ungrahan, ami
Sup't J.. dissenting and voting for re-
Veisub Settle order on notice.
John NJ. McGrnth. respondent vs Same
in opinion and modified affirmed. with,
our costs opinions by Hotchkss and
scott ~ Gngrlham, Y. j., ana scott, -
dissenting and voting FOR reversal) Set
tia order ON notice.
Isaac Breakstone et al, respondents, vs.
Buhalo Foundry Machine Sompany' ap
new trial ordered. costs to. appellant 20
sD9e Hp'oi9Es oEer ON ON noite hsisnn ana
Jennie Lehman. appellant, Us. Jacob
Srmed. NptS with costs 40 opinion order
fled.
Charles NJ. Cohen ct al. respondents.
vs. Rose Lukather. impleaded. appellant
Ion order fled
sofcSss sHs Rapid Tfan.li, company. respcH;
dem ordS srmrd YIN a,..snins ss1ti S S
the ground that the Application OF the
maxim res ipsa ioauitnr anh ne eNiarnue
media:e cause of the accident presented
question for the jury as TO the nesh-
liant. '''a'" vs ouayie company,, responden,
dsms,n' ns,ros and Gsnshin GIns ape J di.sentinsS
o'ns' JACOB Sri ii Rand; ts.pondent, ". Public
ment affirmed. with costs. with leave 10
Defendant to 9wend or paymSs"ss ana sco,, OF 'ois
dis.entina on the ground that the COM
piaint states no cause OF acuonD order
, Joseph > Fay. respondent ,,. ys Cor,
and order affirmed with costs No op'n-
ION The o'Peo PeopIe' n.0 respondent We. Angelina
Sylvs.irG1 apPsaen'n SIas1 n,.d judgment '"f"e'
- Ern@s,o Bi,oiio, appellant, VS.. Bradley
Contracting Company tsspondep.a dspsa 'uus co.,s
20 appellant 10 abide event. Opinion by
clarke, j. order nled. ,,
BENJAMIN L. Moore, appellant VS. VIII
lam O'Rourke president, &C, respond. .
ent order affirmed with $40 costs and
Disbursements. with leave 10 plaintin to
amend on payment OF costs. NO opinion
sarah u coiiean. respondent. v. r..
W woolwc-th company, appeIianl Ordef
80 opinion order hled.
Florence Hals,ed, appellant; vs. JuI,. s,n.,., g
Simm2,5 sim eos;s snd asaTsemeni. s WIN
leave io plaintiff 30 amend on payment Of
costs No opinion order hled.
The American savings Bank defendant.
Pr,c.,ling dismissed. opinion per curIam,
linsraham, r. j., dissen'inso Settle
The People. respondent, ". Alexander De
Meo. appellant judgment affirmed. No
Iudwig Mayer. appellant. va. Dayton
Hedges respondent Judgment and order
Alarmed with costs No opinion. order
Tho same VS.. the same order affirmed
with so costs and Disbursements. No
German American Coffee Company. ap.
pellant. vs.. Clarence A. Diehh respondent
order affirmed with $40 costs and dis
bursements on q" Raismes VS. United
Ingraham y j. and scott, j dissent
ing ON the dissenting opinion in that case }
German American Coffee Company. ap-
p,llaut, ". John oNcll respoudes q
IL Rai-mes ", United states Lithograph lc
Company, lGi App Div Isl. Gngraham
T. J, ana Sco;t. j. discerning on dissent
ing opinion In that caSe.I order fled.
Windsor Realty company. appellant vs.
. jnIsma"n, 1farmtd with cost. 80 opin.
lester Doctor. appellant, vs.. Edward A
: Manice ct al, respondents Judgment az
' hrmed with costs. No opinion. order
nloG
, Poop. OK rel. Herman Mayer. rel, Va
Douglas l. Mckay as Commissioner. re
spordcnt VIII; dismissed and proceed
inss affirmed wi,h $50 costs ard dis
/, bur~omrn's No opinion. order nleI
never. rc.rtor, ys Douglas l. McKa1,. =,
Commissiuner sc, respondent. VIII ia,
n.ssed and proe'eI!nss ani'met ~!t
lon order a,ed '''O-''''''''''' ~ 0P'"
Herber, vandIk., respondent, vs. Iamo
lpMSs119' MS19 s,,r,rs an SG,''ST SIh appn'It tb
opinion % the referee order hl"i.
wG5iT4' lam Yon2s tSs!"'a =; aiI'''a5re al appenS.
! Judgment affirmed with costs opinior
by C.t~ke. J order Med
: Jacob {. Fem, an infant, &c. respon
+. dent ~ Nor"aik Bros GO, appeHAn'
. ana complaint dismissed, with. costs o.
tn" ground mat the hndirg of the Jur
M, the defondant Was neg .gent w
, va hout evidence 10 sustain II. pTd@
2 =, oven plny, appellant, vs. James !
: with costs No opinion ,Mclaugh in an,
{ scott. il. dissenting order Mod.
= rc-ponien, Juds ;nent ANA order affirmed
with costs No oplnion 'Laugh'ih j.. DIS
y The People ~ rel Alvin Boice reator
-. Arthur Woods. a. Commissioner. g.
&. respond nj. Writ dismissed and proceed
Z iugs affirmed with $50 costs and dis
. Gur-smcnts 40 opinion order ned
Bsnyan!n Gortikov. respond,rn,. "
q effIrmei, with costs, No opinion. orde
), Fret Bank of Notasuisa, responden
n - RiChari " Jones, yr., ct a.. appei
i,n', judgment and order affirmed. wit
y ,'S'S' S't rrSt bdhh OF .'N'HNu - -
= Chnmpe :. Andrews, appel tnt ~ Nei
York Times Company, Respondent IgiG
meat An.rmed, with costs. So orirAo'
d, Ordrr He'd
" Williamsburg IRON & Wire WORKS Inc
g., respondent s. John +. Kuhn AID Actin
j.. Accident & Liability Comptu.. lwp'eai
,, costs No opinion. rngrahsm. T.. j. a.
seu'ing Hs 10 the claim Tor extra Nor
' | on tho ground that there was no order
l Writing given b. the genera. contractC
j. 80 'h" y tln' 10 for such extra work as -
uHl'r4 los 'hc second ar'!,.e ~ N" cor
.' cght ron'ftrt'r' .Ord"i nled
S IN IN. ,uaf'or ~ kA-I Hu'r"r. d-casS'
.lr' .nirmed. with costs, 40 opinioI
,. Iu..e Rutl.r respondent, vs. James l
n q Brlcn. appellant. Judgment and ord'
affirmed, with costs No opinion Ords
Mod.
Mcnd-l prcsbe-ger. appellant, Va. NJ
is chtules Bank, Brooklyn judgment ~
~ ofi'r affirmed with costs. No op'nio
= order Med
SkreIe coal Co VS. Chare. T Bake
appeuant order reversed with SO cos
ana Gi~hIrsements and motion denied wi'
90 so costs opinion per euriam. ord
k hlel
* app.ilrnt. W. Arthur J, oK..re a. con
- missioner &c. respondent order sfnrm-
as WIKI $40 costs and disbursements
ll opinion order hed
81 pc aui ~ FrrIrrick j. II Krackc,
.- commissioner SC, respondent. OId"r d
ld nrm,i with $40 costs and disbursement
30 80 opinion order Med.
In the matter ~ tn. Same order a
~,