Tulsa daily world. [volume] (Tulsa, Indian Territory [Okla.]) 1905-1919, 1915-11-04

in error twenty days thereafter in
which to file answer brief, MuskO-
see Industrial Development company
VS.. G. G. Ayrcs. stricken from assign
meut; j. NJ. Hunter VS.. A.. r.. Jaynes,
plaintiff in error given thirty days
from Nov. ], 1915, to file brief. De,
lendaut in error given twenty dayi
thereafter to file answer brief; G. +,
Gillian, ct AL, VS.. Guaranty State
bank, defendant in error given twenty
Gays additional time i'm which to file
brief; l.. O. Smith VS.. Rufus Bond,
plaintiff in error given until Nov. II,
1915, to file brief. Defendant i'm error
given twenty days thereafter to file
answer brief; c. NJ. Howard VS.. A. O.,
kiucaid, defendant i'm error given to
Nov. 10, 1915, to file brief; st. Louis,
Iron Mountain & SO. Ry. Co.. Va.
Charles Patterson, set for oral argu-
ment Nov. 20, 1915; J.. II. Newcomer
Us. Sam Love, dismissed as per stipu,
IdtiOni Weathcrly vs.. BristOw, plain,
tiff in error given until Dec. 10, 1915,
to file briefs. Defendant in erroi
twenty days thereafter to file answer
brief. oral argument waived; Wag>
rer Telephone company VS.. j. c. Yer
million, second petition for rchearing
Genied, S. ID. Patrick. ct uX., VS.. Ira
iuWnc, petition for rchcaring denied;
Laura Parks, et al, VS.. Wiley Hayes,
ct al, petition for rehearing denied;
Cater & StrOh Millinery Co. VS.. Miss
Nell HiIliker, petition for Tehearing
denied, y. +. Fouts, ct al, VS.. T. J.
Nance. ease made amended as per
stipulation; National Refining COM.
pany vs.. Lena May SteCkCl, ct al, dis.
missed as per stimulation: a. l..
Dchncr, ct AL, VS.. Frank 4. Curry. 81
.LI AI.rIfrff .t....- rrr.t.U NJ. AZ fntE
60 file brief. Defendant in error
given twenty days thereafter to file
brief, Midland Savings q Loan co. VS..
NoIghhors, defendant in error given
twenty days additional i'm which to
file briefs; A. K. Parsons VS.. i. E..
Smith, ct AL, petition FOR rchearing
denied. II. B.. LOCkett VS.. EIy-Walker
Dry Goods company, plaintiff i'm error
given permission TO file typewriter
brief within fifteen days from Nov.
I, 1918. Defendant i'm error given ten
days to file typewriter answer brief.
hoggctt VS.. DogEett, continued for tho
term and stricken from the assign
mCut, w. L. Harm VS.. G. f.. Estabruok,
ct AL, stricken from assignment ana
continued for term, as per stipula-
ton; Lewis Jones vs.. Oracle Jones,
petition for rphclTing denied. l.. v.
Mullen. ct AL, VS.. Anderson Gardner.
ct al, set for oral argument on Nov.
%, 1915.
Division No. I.
Commissioner I;obberts-J. O.
league VS.. G. w. Adams. Nohl>
county, affirmed. O. b. Garrison &.
Co. VS.. i. A.. Meyers. ct al. jefferson
county. affirmed, j. T.. Cayauagh VS..
Jonas Johauuosscu. pittsburg county.
affirmed, T.. A.. Barnes VS.. American
National Bank. ct AL. Oklahoma
county. affirmed, George u. Shawacre
US. Oscar Morris, Lincoln county, af-
tlrmed Newton Kelsey VS.. Kelsey
Land company, Carter county, at
tirmcd. Carscy Baken vs.. +, NJ. Fox
and j. VI. Carlock, Carter county. re-
vCrsed and rcmandcd.
Commissioner Matthews - Edward
Chastain and Nevada Chastain VS..
BCulah Peuder. Ct an. Tulsa county.
reversed and remanded: James ].
Jones -. 5. II. kress 4 Co., Oklahoma
county, affirmed; State of Oklahoma.
cN rel. J. II. Landlord VS.. J.. b. Jack
son. trustee, Greek county. dismissed:
Lee May VS.. James Fitzpatrick, ct al,
Grady county, dismissed; G.. B. Camp-
pell VS.. Newton & Driskill, IA corpora
ton. Canadian county, reversed and
rcmauded.
The case Of Helen WEIGH VS.. Maud
WEIGH. ct al. from Ottawa county. was
dismissed i'm ~ opinion by the court
proper.