The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1915-12-04

Ahe iohowiHB uecisioHs Wcro hdiiu"u
down yesterday by the Appellate Divi-
sion, First Department
Mary Meagher. respondent. W. sesrun
sosiety., appellant. Judgment and otder
La"shiin and Clarke. .JJJg.. IIas.entins on
the ground that the verdict that the de-
PENDANT was guilty OF negiissnce VAS
filed.
New York and Boston Despatch Express
Company suing &C. respondent, vs.
ofGsr reversed WITH siS cost. ana dis:
bursements and motion granted With w
costs, opinion by insrah1m. r; !; .M On
opinion Of lehman. - order filed.
Hyman BAuman. and another. appel
lsnts Y. Mendls.Lanepp Company. r.,
costs ON opinion of Guy, j. order hled.
In the matter of Christian Il, Detmold.
deceased. Decree modihed a. directed In
costs to all parties appearing, payable
out Of the estate: Opinions ~ InsTshsm
.sS n; ana S sss,i. Order sa on iDS SS,ia.. o. '"'
Fitch. Cornell a Co. appellant. "; At
Gibson, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway
Company. respondent. Judgment affirmed
order filed.
va. Se chsrie. N Il. Gray '%%s siS}.; .na STAT:
STm'e aosir. re%' 70 apinion .NU orasa n H."'
O. H0 ssrre as."A apps s,SSn'" jadsm.ai ana
Clarke and iaushiin. u. d~nsraham. p.
Hied.
Edward d. Murphy and another. respon-
dents. vs.. n. \. Central Railroad COM
PAM. appellant. judgment reversed with
costs and complaint dismissed with costs.
I~Laugniln, J.. dissenuns.) Settle order
on notice.
Gillette Clipping Machine COMPANY. re.
appellant. order reversed with $40 costs
iendant Wilson sustained with $40 costs.
opinion BY lngrsham. J.. }. 'Laughiih'
j., dissenting order fled.
Terence MoKegney. appellant. Us; IL
l'nois surety COMPANY, respondent. Jodg-
appellant to abide event. opinions BY
Scott and Mclaughlin, u. Mclaughlin
and bowling. JJ. dissenting order
j. Albert Fish, respondent. vs.. Frank
A vanderiip. appellant: order eihrmea
to amend answer on payment Of costs.
Dissenting opinion by LAush'in. ID
In the matter Of william W. Farley a.
STATE COMMISSIONS of Excise. sppei!Ant'
vs. re Christian vorndran. respondent
don granted with oosts. opinion by Dow
H.hari.. K. Masaaley, respondent. vs..
iaGsment anu order reversed with costs
alJ complaint dismissed with costs. opih-
ion by Scott, J order Med.
Maurice A. Mack. appellant. vs. DOCK
Contractor COMPANY. respondent Juds,
men; reversed, new trial ordered. costs TO
appellant to ABIDE event. opinion per
curtain. order nled.
Matthew }. kcarney, respondent, vs.
Judgment affirmed with costs to respon-
dent. payable out of the estate. opinion
sy MS IA, u, !; ,L" 1sasi ai H@a DOW
Fannie Moses. appellant, vs. Moses II:
Moses ct al. respondent Order moi!ned
frmed wi,Aout costs. opinion by Clarke,
j. settle order on notice,
Marcus u. Coleman. respondent, VS.. s..
reversed with $40 costs and disburse-
men,s and motion granted with so costs
Opinion by smith, j. ord,r n,sd' ,,
liant. IS. Jacob Rupert. respondent. Judg-
ment reversed. new tria! ORDERED. costs
70 appellant to S,s sGid de. stsn'' op'iA0" 0y
Matthews Sales COMPANY incorporated
respondent, vs.. Aubrey G. Hutoheson' np,
ordered. cost, to appellant to abide event.
Opinion by Laughlin, J. Order nled.
!. Tanenbaum, Strauss & CO.. Inc; re
lants. Judgment and order affirmed with
costs. No opinion. order nled
Along -The-Hudson Company. appellant.
VS. charles IL. Ayrc-. respondent. Judg-
m.n, and findings reversed as Indicated In
opinion and Judgments ordered as directed
In opinion with costs 20 appellant, ti!n-
ion hy Clarke. !. settle order on notice.
Mater Of Manhattan Hallway Company
appellant ~ Ant,i' lo,N,F e a. p,,
a. orders affirmed with costs. No op.n-
Paul -. Tismer. respondent. - Ne"
YORK Edison CompAnb, appellant Juds'
ment reversed wish costs and complain
dismissed with costs. opinion by scott j
The Peoplc. g., respondents. " Adolpf
Schmidt. appellant. determination al
4 utmri Win costs. 80 opinion. orde'
Philip Manson. appellant. vs. X kins::
/ bury Gurus. rcspoudcnt. Judgment a.
armed with cos!!s 80 opinion order h'rH
j He.uort bA.Ahtl.r, ft-pohnthl, Ns
James Z. Br,kNith, appellant. Judsmeh'
and order affirmed VITA cost-' 40 opinion
pAui., Hormar. respondent. - Raipi
Rosart. appellant Judgment ar!rmet
Win costs. 80 opinion. Oraer MED.
dent. IS. Antonio Bohlty and another. ap
panants. Judgment affirmed with costs
80 opinion. order Med.
;ioua. sur'ty company, appellant otd"'
auirmrd win go cc,,s and disbursement
Ncttir Raught, respondent, vs. Rolant
J. : Marsh Il Al, ln'p'eLied tppe''anls
To appellant 10 abide event. opinion b>
CLARKE. j. order hIed.
Sehastlno t'raCu. respondent. ". Bradl'A
Contracting Complain. appellant. Judgmen'
ana order r.N.iscd new lriaI ordered, cost
to appellant TO abide event. opinion pei
curiam. order Med.
In the matter of Joseph r MeGruc. d."
ceased. Minnie M.grue, petitioner. De
cree affirmed with costs. Opin!on bl
Scott. j. order Med.
Lucy +. Prince as admInlstratriX. re
spondent, vs.. New YORK Consolidated Rail.
road Company, appellant, judgment re,
versei with costs and complaint dismissed
with costs, opinion per curiam Laugh
lin and smith. il, dissenting order
Maria l.. Caroccio as Administrative, re
Spuni'nt. vs.. Shults Bread Company. APP
pr.lHnt. judgment and order affirmed
DruIson Cotton MIL Company, respon'
dent. vs.. 'Herx A Eddy, appellant, Judg'
ment ana order affirmed with costs, ~
opinion, tSmith, j., dissenting I.aughlin
j. dissenting and voting for reversal ans
new trial unless plalntin stipuldtcs to re
ducc verdict to our-thirdD order hled.
Isaac Hcidelburg,r respondent, ys. Hat,
tie Heido.bcrgcr Ell al, appellants. Juds
mcnt and order reversed win costs and
complaint dismissed with costs, Opinion
by Scott, j order filed,
Charles johnson, appellant, w. Hedder
Construction Company, respondent. Judg
appellant TO abide event. opinion pei
curiam order hled.
Henry II. Fox. respondent, w. city al
New York, ct al, appellants. judgment
reversed, new trial ordered, costs to APP.
p.lant to abide event. opinion By Clarke
j. order filed.
James [. Dennis as executor, respon.