The West Virginian. [volume] (Fairmont, W. Va.) 1914-1974, 1915-06-04

Whsn nB6inRa for change In address,
Ets4 Old EaaS well as new eddress
-. :=
RtpAYI JUNE 1915.
R4NDoM Y u EMAR<s.
ii IS certainly hlmiliating to an
astorney who believes, he is really
some pumpkins to have the disclosure
tnadethatS he Isl being iused as dummy
for b big cooperation lawyer. But il
mist befnhders GOD; that in the future.
as IN the past, oftenF some really high
ciass eatss paws are used by the pre-.
datoFy interest in the accomplishment
81 thett nefarious purposes: 1t Is sad
to felateI this; but nevertheless and
uotwtt ding. Il IS more or less true
HI this Communicates well as others
Of more On less Importance. This
prerogafiveS seems to be in the cata-
iogue % inallenable rights OF the
special interests. The proof is some.
times hard 20 get, but sometimes 1t
crops out III common run Of events.
We say sometimes because such
traci $ usual well covered by tho
pussy.footS brigade. Yes, yes, it is
SAD, but true i and5we fear unless d re.
form wave strikes this old earth soou
II VIII continue to- be true for some
time yet,
in such cases being found out is the
thing that hurts the conscience most,
where il facts there is any conscience
LETT 10 be 90 afflicted.
And further. IL might be added, that
some careless one, or two and per-
laps three; win be called upon the
carpet by. the boss to give slow and
solemn ansWerswhy 1t was that such
careiessness was ipdulged in by the
trusted copy bearers, that the mysteri-
ous document was allowed to be left
with, remain q part Of, to adhere to.
to become CONCEALED with, and other
wise Inussfupft heip leadings Of the said
Renben Anderson This mark.
And leaving out OF the case entirely
the consideFat ton OF the real de-
fendants. Who are. sthe taxpayers Of
FatFment WHO have been sullenly.
inso1ently and humiliatingly ignored
IN ssid case how do YOU imagine
an attorney feels who has been
catalogaedS byg the "chief counsel
Tor both sides. as e gureheads, along
With the said Rebpen Anderson (hls
lnarll vino mas suffered SO much an
gltish otshearts on account OF the pass
age o. the new charter?
And referrfng once again, dear
leaders,, to me said case OF the said
Reuben Anderson. (hts mark, it is
refreshing to note that although a suit
fer fn3unction has been hurled into
the tnnoeent faces Of all the commits
sioners by tie Democratic ring,
no hard feelings have been in
evidence on either side Of the case.
Ii is fortunate indeed, when men can
so far forget their anger and be
guided solely ~ the gentler Christian
EptEttSs ~ OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES 4hH' -
I'M should later on be discovered
that the oseswo rked city attorney was
relieved Of the onnrous duty Of prepar
ing his answer IN the Reuben Ander.
SON tliis mario ease; Ste certainly has
something more 20 be thankful for
than the $1,000 annual slice of the
sac 900 salary Grab
But after atlEhass been said and after
the piatntiff ana the defendants have
al done stheir worst 6, we must be merct
fnl irour opinions for are not Messrs:
Nicely and Lowe, only congressman
and senator respec tIyely, and we will
add for good measure, respectfully
and IN the languages of Senator stroth
CT. Obey are; aEsSt they not e
THESE rambling remarks may not
have ans bearing on the court and
they are not intended to have, but
they win to some extent regale the
people with some inside information
lnrned wong sd out for their inspec:
ton, even though IL may be to their
rc1He s Ne, s