Honolulu star-bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1912-2010, 1915-03-10
COMING
To make SMART
PROVE CHARGES
Continued from page one, !

views held between Mrs knight and
Smart last month. Mrs. Knight ac.
cused Smart of treating her harshly
in his talk on those occasions. Smart's
counsel replied By affidavit that he
had ceen kind In his manner and In
his language" and had treated her
with the utmost consideration"
"Affiant has carefully noted Mr..
Smart's version of his interviews with
Mrs. Knight" says Kinney in his ain.
davit; that afiant believes Mr..
Thompson when he. asserts that Mr..
Smart claims he was 'considerate of
Mrs. Knight and kind in his manner
and in his language, and further that
he treated Mrs. knight with the ut.
most consideration" in his said inter.
views
SIaps at Smart. ~. ~ (.
Furthermore affiant affirms that
said Smart apparently actually be.
lieyes and thinks that in the interviews
aforesaid with Mrs. knight that
he was considerable OF Mrs. Knight
and kind in his manner and In his
language" and that he treated her
with the utmost consideration but
affiant asserts that this is due as the
record herein will bear out the fact
that Mr.. Smart's conception of kind
and considerate treatment Is abnor.
NAL and of an extremely low and per
verted type; that the kindness and
consideration claimed by Mr. Smart to
have been shown BY him to his late
wife, Thelma, is of the same type and
order as the Kindness and considera.
ton shown Mrs. Knight in their re-
cent so4called compromise interviews,
which also is as iaffiant believes and
alleges the same character of kind.
ness and consideration Mr.. Smart pro-
poses to show toward Richard if allow.
ed to retain custody OF his person,
and that the difference between Mrs.
Knights version Of her compromise
interviews with Mr.. Smart and the lat.
ter's version thereof can be reconciled
TO some extent by recognizing the
limitations upon Mr.. Smarfs capacity
for distinguishing between consider.
ate and kind treatment and treatment
that is not. a5ss
On Information and belief affiant
denies in behalf OF Mrs. knight that
she either directly or indirectly as.
scented to the truth of Nj. Smarts
charges against Mr.. Fred knight made
in said compromise interviews be.
tween them and denies that she mis-.
led or intended to mislead Mr.. Smart
In taking down In writing the condi.
Itions imposed by Mr.. Smart ia offer
ing Mrs Knight Che custody Of Rich
ard. Affiaht states that Mr.. Cathcart
Is correct IN bis affidavit where he
alleges that be was never informed
by affiant of the statement made by
Mt Smart that he was prepared to
give Richard to Mrs. knight at the
time the last viii Of his deceased wife
Thelma was read. nor had affiant in
mind creating any such impression by
his first reply affidavit herein, but
affiant reaffirms on oath most posi-.
lively that he was so told by Mr..
Thompson, his statement being one os
extreme Importance and one so noted
By affiant from the moment the state.
'Inent was made, particularly that par:
of the statement which fixed the day
that the third viii was opened and
read as the time when Mr., Smart was
ready to have given the child to Mrs
Knight II she had acted right.