Arizona republican., 1915-03-06

is submitted. The motion was car
 Encouraged by this success. MT. Newbury then renewed the Graham motion for the reconsideration of the vote by which the Graham motion to take up the Cook mine taxing bill in a special meeting of the commit tee of the whole.
 A new bill was introduced in the house requiring the cities and towns of the state to establish free munici-. pal employment bureaus.
 A bill was introduced by MT. Pow CTS making appropriation for the continuance of the state offices. An other bill was introduced by MT. Powers relating to state and county taxes, providing for a special levy to raise $20O.00O for a state school fund. MT. Powers requested an i'm mediate consideration of the general appropriation bill. The days work in the house was ended by the pass ment bills.
 One of the events of the day was the extension of the courtesy of the floor to MT. and Mrs. R. B. Leach It was nothing to MT. Leach, for he is used to it, having been present as sergeant at arms of that body. MT and Mrs. Leach were married the day before. and this was their first exposure to the public.
 The Senate.
 The piece de resistance in the upper house was the wedding cake of the junior senator from Yavapai commemorating the twenty-fifth an niversary of her wedding. It was appropriately washed down by tho debate on the prohibition bill whicr was dragged out again. Mir Karns who had tried to turn that trick once before, moved that it be amend ed so that one might import intoxi- eating liquors for his own use. Only formerly he had not been definite as to the quantity. This time his amendment was specific and certain but no more successful. He would limit the quantity that citizer might import to be drunk in the bosom of his family, to one gallor for each calendar month. It was no, his belief that an Arizonian could noticeably saturate himself under such a limitation
 Mr. Stapley, on the other hand of fered an amendment to make the bil still more rigid. Mir Karns said 1T behalf of his motion that if familie. could have all the liquor they wanted there would be no incentive for the activities of the bootlegger. Mir Stapley was unable to see a differ ence in the results that would follow the two methods of catering to tn, thirst unless it might lie in the fac that here would be more drunken ness in the homes.
 There was a tilt between MT karns and MT. Drachman. The latte said that the former on his lat visit to his home at Nogales hat been talked to" and he proceeded t. remark upon the influence of tn whisky trust
 ! MT. Karns denied that he was un der any influence: he had voted fo the prohibition amendment but h did not know at that time, and h did not believe that ninety per cen of the people who voted for it wer aware. that its purpose was to in terfere with the personal use 0 liquor. The Karns motion was los and the senate turned to other mat ters.
 Mrs. Munds' marriage bill fixin a minimum wage at which person could marry, eighteen for males an 1 sixteen for females, came up agair i Objection was renewed to that fea fture of it which provides that i cases of forced marriages betwee persons under age, or if either 0 them is under age, they shall no be permitted to live together unt they have attained the minimum az fixed by the bill. MT. Stapley move | to strike out that provision, am Mrs. Munds promptly moved to Ia his motion on the table That failed