Bisbee daily review., 1915-06-11
a aECALL OF HUNT
 WANTED BY MANY
CCout.nued from page D

tCout.nued from page D
 ty Goodwin, and II. B. s. by Acuh All of these bills were referred to tho land committee of the house and there ras reported the early part Of the week a bill known as substitute II. B ]. which has since been given con slderation the greater part of the timC tue house was in session. The sub atitute bill, it is claimed, was writer largely by Maricopa county interests and meets the wishes in many part culars of the holders of leases O. school lands belonging to the state The provisions as to the appraisal O improvements on public lands cause, the greatest disagreement in the hous, which is not yet through with cOns' iteration of the bill. The appraisa scheme was for the state land con missioner, which office is created tl name two appraisers and the chair nan of the Board of Supervisors the county wherein the land is lOcatet was to name the third one Thei findings were to be approved by tn commissioner from whose decisio- there could be no appeal. The schoc land leaseholders desire the count superUsoral chairman to name on member of the board of appraisal, 2 second member to be named by tn rate land commissioner and thes two men to select a third and case the apprsisement fixed Is nc satisfactory then an appeal may b. taken to the courts.
 The lesser important provisions O i the bill are taken almost wholly fror 1 the land bill introduced in the frs 1 session prepared largely by Fen Hi 1 dreth, formerly registrar Of the Ian office and the Hon Chas Ward, a fol Inner Colorado legislator, now pract cing law in Phoenix There Is littl doubt judging from the expression Of senators who have been followin the course of the biU in the hous' that many of the provisions of the bi 1 already agreed to by the house vii be altered in the senate and it is no 1 improbable that the land code will b. 1 the dividing question between the tw' houses, and cause a long drawnou session.
 This. by the way, brings mp th point that to date the legislature ha
 failed to agree on an appropriation
 for the expense of the session H. F
 9, as originally introduced by Powers
 appropriated S45000 which would hav
 been sufficient for a sixty day session
 The senate refused to accept this bil
 and offered an amendment reducin the appropriation to $18000 whicl
 would have been sufficient for a tweT
 ty day session. The bin having gon
 to conference twice and no agree
 iheut, died. There was then introdt
 ced by Representative Powers reprC ? septing the appropriation committe D. II. B. No IS which in terms apprC
 priated any money necessary to b paid from the general fund for th
 payment of per diem of legislator land salaries of clerks. This bill, whe
 sent to the senate, was considered b
 that body not positive enough in it
 terms as to insure a short session an
 it is now pending adjudication
 T. B. No. 2, by Newburyi which pr
 yides for additional stenographers the incorporating bureau of the co poration commission over what wa provided for In the general ap2ropr ation bin is still before Che hous committee on appropriations. Repr
 sentative Sweeuey's bill providir
 tor a similar contingency n tho oA'