The Watertown weekly leader. [volume] (Watertown, Jefferson County, Wis.) 1912-1917, 1915-11-16
FREEDOM OF SEAS
DEMANDED BY J. S.
Washington Warns Britain to
Keep Within Law.
BLOCKADE Is INDEFENSIBLE
England Told That America VIII No
Longer Submit to Trespass Upon
Its Rights-Must Not Mo-
lest Trade.

ting to Great Britain that the United
States will not further submit to the
curtailment of it's neutral rights, which
has been the effect of the allies block
ade of Germany since March IL, is
contained in the note to Great Britain
made public by the state department.
After declaring that the United
States cannot with complacency suf-
fer further subordination of it's rights
and interests" the note serves notice
in the following paragraph that Great
Britain will be held to the enforce
ment of the letter of international
law:
1.-THE government of the United
States desires to impress most ear
nestly upon his majesty's government
that it must insist that the relations
between it and his majesty's govern
ment be governed. not by a policy Of
expediency, but by those established
rules of international conduct upon
which Great Britain in the past has
held the United States to account when
the latter nation was belligerent en-
gagged in struggle for national exist
ence. 1t is of the highest importance
to neutrals not only of the present day,
but of the future, that the principles
of international right be maintained
unimpaired"
Defending Neutral Rights.
That the United States has taken
itcoIf hn oclz Of Hnfnndino a
rights of all neutral nations against
the British program of Selling and
holding up merchant vessels at will is
indicated in this paragraph:
This task of champiOning the in
tegrity of neutral rights, which have
world against the lawless conduct OF
belligerents arising out of the bitter
ness of the great conflict which is now
wasting the countries of Europe, the
United States unhesitatingly assumes,
and to the accomplishment of that task
it will devote its energies, exercising
always that impartiality which from
the outbreak of the war it has sought
to exercise in it's relations with the
warning nations"
The note covers exhaustively the
subject of British interference with
American trade since the beginning of
the war and declares the so-called
blockade of the allies ineffective H.
legal and indefensible." The note was
made public by agreement between the
state department and the British for
eign Office and carries with it volum-
nous appendix giving the text of
American naval instructions issued in
1862 and summary and table showing
hundreds of vessels detained by Brit
fish authorities since the present war
began
Deals With Contraband Question
The note itself is divided into thir-
ty-tive points, dealing with all phases
of the contraband question, seizure
and definitions, and announces that a
separate communication will be sent
soon dealing particularly with the
"propriety and right of the British
government to include in their list of
contraband of war certain articles
which have been so included"
The note is dated October Fl and
acknowledges the British notes of
January Z, February 10, June %, July
%, two on July 81, August Is and the
note verbale of August 6, all relating
to restrictions upon American com
MERGE
After an argument on law and facts,
Secretary Lansing in conclusion says.
Il believe it has been conclusively
shown that the methods sought to be
employed by Great Britain to obtain
and use evidence of enemy destination
of cargoes bound for neutral ports
and to impose a contra band character
upon such cargoes are without justifi-
such methods are partly founded is
ineffective, illegal and indefensible;
that the judicial procedure offered as
a means OF reparation for an interna-
tional injury is inherently defective
for the purpose; and that in many
ton of the law of nations.
u. S. Cannot Submit
The United States, therefore, can
not submit to the curtailment of it's
neutral rights by these measures.
which are admittedly retaliatory, and
therefore illegal, in conception and in
nature and intended to punish the enc
mics of Great Britain for alleged ille-
gallties on their part. The United
States might not be in a position to
object to them if its interests and the
interests-of all neutrals were unaf.
fected by them, but, being affected, it
cannot with complacence suffer fur
Their subordination of its rights and
interests to the plea that the excep-
tional geographic position of the enc
mics of Great Britain requires or jus
tify oppressive and illegal practices
Denies British Contention.
In answer to the British contention
that conditions relating to the size
and seaworthiness of modern carriers
of commerce justify bringing vessels
into port for search. the report of a
board OF United States Dayal experts
Most Precious Relic
A group OF children whose mothers
belonged to the Daughters of The