Norwich bulletin. [volume] (Norwich, Conn.) 1895-2011, 1915-08-31
FOR SUPERIOR COURT DOCKET
Rush 10 File Cases in Final and Foreclosures
Town Of Preston Claims Damages for Dam Burst
ns-Norwich Woman Accuses Son Of Fraud In o.
tanning Deed to oceum Property Mother Wants Gus
tody of Children

Nf6dietown and kraaS \, Lucas a
View York for ths bSeaIs1no of ths
Pcqnstanuck dam %. Jan. IS 1915 BY
which one abutmsrt of ne road
siderable portion Cf shs roadway, and
the other abutmsnt was undermined
total expenditure Of 5000 for rspaiss
Bank accounes Us the Norwich Saw
bank have been ATTACHED Ss wen as
real estate IN Preston Brown e. Per-
kfns apear for the plafnefR
70 Colloc3 on Bcgsds
On ne claim that on March 3, 1865,
Elsie A. Casey OF Ealtiunors bound
herself 20 pay $3.50 with interest 70
Jol1n ". Reynolds 6f thfs city, winch
she has is6s done, Mr. Reynolds brings
SUIT Co collect the claim Shields q
Shields are his attorneys.
Appeal from Prvbats.
An appeal from probate OF the win
OF the late Anna A. Bushnell Of NOR
wich is brought by her uncle, Orrfn D
VeTgason. o. BozF2h, who claims 70
be the sole h6iF-4t-Iaw, and next Of
kin and dlstrjbutee Of her estate.
Ebenezer Allen fs executor Of the win
and Attorney J. J. Desmond is the
lawyer for the appellant.
accuses Son Of Fraud.
SAFyt 1e0FBfAnH4 VeDO OF tn18 cI<y,
who admits that she does not read,
write nor understand the English Ian
guage, - the plaintiff in a. suit which
she has brought against her son, Vir-
tune j. p. Pslouuin, in order 70 ps-
cover from him real estate in. Occum
he 10 holding the real estate By viz
tue Of pretended qtfft~clafm deed,
which sire declares she never signed
with the knowledge that she was con-
veyinE Eae property to htuL In the
claims made In the writ dr4wn BY
Attorney ". ?. A. Quinn for the plain
tin some peculiar conditions are re-
vea1ed AcCosd5ne 20 tl1fs 39r Pet
oqufn was occupying am urpeT bese-
n1ent in tie house In Occun and pay
Ing Mrs. Tebo ~ per week for H. but
he failed 70 pay for tire week Of May
he Claimed ownership Of the property
and she has been unable to get him
out Of the pIace since thens
His ownership claim 10 based on
what she calls q pretended deed, ex-
ecutsd on April "a, IN whieh the sig
by her mark; but she claims she never
efgned such q quit claim deed. but she
did make her VIII ON April rs in which
she left al to her son and n she did
sign the quit claim deed IL was In the
belief that Il was for the purposes OF
carrying OUT TIC prCNlml0x& Oh me Will
This pretended deed. the plaintiff
states, remained I'm the hands Of J. J.
Desmond up to May Ord, when II was
secured from hina by Mr.. Pe1oquin
She says that she has reposed conf
dence and trust ia her son, which 1laa
been abused and that moreover she
has been In such a disturbed state OF
mind through reports about her hus-
band that she was unable 10 think
or act properly for her own inter-
ests.
She asks Tor. Judgment for the pos
session Of the premises: and by way
Of equitable relief, a decree DECLARING
the pretended deed void and a fur
Their decree requiring the defendant
to convey the property TO 5fEg. Tebo
or that title and Possession OF thu
premises be vested in her, and also
an Injunction restraining Ar. PeIoquin
from conveying or encumberfng the
property and from collecting the rents
Final Rush 10 FiIs.
Such a. large number OF cases nIec
in one day Il accounted for By the
fact that the limit time for gettfne
cases in expires on Wednesday, SO
that all the attorneys and deputy sf1er-
ifs are getting the papers out Of their
hands and into the clerks Once.