The Seattle star. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1899-1947, 1915-02-26


are ss charter three bridge bond Issues and
s prspo'0es N which the question OF monlePa ownership 70
selection three oo~ina a explanation Of
accommodations.
AMENDMENT NO Proposes that OF tho
o the VOTE ' go S'f as ne Iss '''
AMENDMENT NO 2-PropOses that the city free water
light any other service Of public utility char
AZ the ors'so, time charitable Institutions may obtain with the
der ,hs head semieharbls N. A and
believe charitable
against this amendment believe should Cor
seres from ely utilities regardless OF the charitable nature OF the
a; the council to the
various institutions amounts TO $3.50 month.
tons the employees Of the ,rsasurera office This III. only
'Is .' "o' S%S se Is .s % @ s OF ns
VoTe FOR THis H@GNomgNr '' - ''''''
AMENDMENT NO give RICH,
'9saey and ssssne ss over the Mayors veto 40 s s
less clause attached In that event, the
the people invoking referendum IL while
be argued that the council should the right OF nae'no
ess sets,,ns" eSs essno, be- yossa as 20 other meas
20" the s1sas,oss resrs - At , , s @
veto o S.as s o"'ss ' s S
@ s:SHS "" VOTE a Aes s i1Ss
AMENDMENT NO spropOsea preferences the employment
Toss states any Who s heads Of s%. Sor2 ron IT,
AMENDMENT NO eprovds the preferential system Of voting BY
are .ss,ss IN one ssssn os,ssd "s SoSloo primary
en and then 'na election Every voter Ia give" the right to
,sS .. sSs' ss Of so,. s no., no
dda,o majority o. the first choice then the second
Of the eombnsa votes he IL elected.
eouu,sd rsesoo hOh.s,
been IN Us. spokane for the past i've years
has resulted IN the saving Of money " me people a. 80. Is SAVING
and addition will afford better opportunity to majority rule
only Sory vote; s.s ,.n ne s.+w Q, the people s "
The preferential system q sssDa sy INC mso.
Cd H. yo1e roR Hae.oagsr NO wv
PROPOSITIONS bridge
Fremont Bridges '1, ross ss ws.sTSso 80 VS. eco
vote the people but the court declared ,h bends es
Meal details The has been corrected and the bonds
ties. Bond propos,oos ard carry. FOR
PROPOSITION bridge Eas,lase
os'9n as0S.,ss = Tenth ave IN Pe.0. ss1In ~, the sa
advantage " have ,he bridge built Whether sh ave Tenth
bridge than neither Proposition No bond
PROPOSITION question whether
city shan spend rot over $4,000 90, Be .'.: Tor auto
a railway The Star suggested this proposition and believes
The ."es. sy 10. y s e. o.'" s.s,s ms ="
north TO make paying proposo" and should also have an
- Of Second Third
" Ts ~. .s " ne coy o SaU Ss'
In this coming from Ballard when the extension
made from Ross or any other poD, on the present p"s..
the Lake eusn line can be brought downtown instead o.
municipal railway.
sne viii thu, s Induced to Sss tn. city ines S0s The ,0
$4,000. THE sTAP FULLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE
PROPOSITION a.
PROPOSITION tire proposed Division
railway Ballard $4,000
$4,000 This
with the original plans Of the people when they voted $4,000
I Intended that Division a should
be the whole Of the city railway Division 10 only unit
o
The $4,000 the foundation
. .
string the wires TO Ballard.
the the Subsatons
$4,000 100000 will make the municipal railway
note tend
Ballard original a
therefore strongly recommends that VOTE YES ON
PROPOSITION
PROPOSITION csubrts the question whether policy
council which has
reduction Of electric service 20 residences Seattle from
o 6 a klo~att shall be continued.
VOTE YES ON PROPOSITION c.
HOW DOES This STRIKE YOU?