The Bridgeport evening farmer., 1915-03-18
MRS. ANGLE SHOULD KNOW HER FATE BY
 TOMORROW EVENING
Continued from Page One

Did she seem to respond to treat ment ?e
 s'she seemed to improve slowly
 what was the condition of her room when you went there June 25 2"
 Ut was in order, except that there was a dish with what appeared to be strawberry shortcake on it. There were small glasses. books and a, plate with cigar and cigarette butts in 1t on the table, The cross examination. was then be- gun.
 weren't you with your daughter. on July 4, from g 3. nl:, to D. m. and from s D. m- to 9 p. n.''
 T was not witness said with ena- phasfs- 1T went there early but had to wait for Chief Brennan. I saw my daughter for about five minutes. I. came back in the afternoon and had =to wait again before saw her for ninute.''
 How long were you in the build ing on June 24 ?''a
 About minutes
 We're you at the coroner's hearing on June 25 2,'
 IT didn't attend any hearth gs.''
 MT. Cummings read from the cor onerss notes The notes reported MT. Blonde1I as testtfying at the hearing.
 1T said was at the first hearing for a few nlfnutes.t'
 Isn't that the afternoon you said you vera at the Rippowam building ?''
 Yes, sir.ss
 On redirect. MT. BlondeII said he went to the Rippowam building before. going to the corners hearing
 tsDo you know when it was that Mrs. Angle first found out what had been testified to before the coroner 2r
 .tI do not. T
 Here the defense rested.
 Joseph c. Houghtons a banker ot Stamford, was called by the state in rebutta1. He said he knew BaIlou very we'll for 20 years.
 sDId you ever see him under the influence Of liquor
 Counsel for the defense objected and both Judge Downs and MT. Cum nnings gave opinions to the adnaassa- bi1ity of the question. Judge Williams deIIberated several rntnutea hefore ruling out the question:.
 Here a recess was taken
 pr. Samuel Fierson was recalled af4 lster the recess. Dr. Pierson Ayas at the hospital when Ba1Iou was taken there.
 s.Did you detect the odor of nauor
 did not.s'
 Cross-eza1nine ed. Dr. PIerson said he made only the usual exami nation.
 Have you any particular interest in this case z Judge Downs Shouted.
 have none sg
 s.Do you use whis11ey yourself E
 do nots'
 You,re d deacon of a church aren,t you and don't use 1iauor
 Yes. sir, pr. John F. Harris, who was at the hospital the night of June 23s said he did not detect the odor Of liquor on BaIIou that night.
 Would you say he was 2 temper ate man 2''
 Yes"
 satd he didn't detect the odor Of liquor on E3a1lo11. when he saw him lying on the sidewalk or at the hospital.
 Were you looking for the o6or of liquor on his breath ?.' he was asked on cross-exa n1nation.
 tsI can't say that was
 Cornelius F.. NGcGu1nness said he did not detect an odor of liquor on BaIIou when he was taken to the hospital
 John A. WendIe testified similarly. He saw BaIlou on the sidewalk in front of the RippoWan building.
 Policeman John J. McMahon testi- fed similarly
 Sergeant Foley was recalled,
 sFDid you examine the steps in the Rippowan buiidfng2. 2.'
 Yea afr4'
 twas there anything the matter with any of the steps?'
 He said his examination had been i minute.
 Otto A. Makowske. who lived across the street from Bal1ou was next
 pia you know Ballou very
 f'Yes; he was one of my customers z NakovFs1xe Is a barber
 Makofske said he left his shop to go home at 10 o'clock. He got to the R4ppowatn building at Iofo5.
 Was there man standing taeres'
 Kes.'s
 seVvIlo was 1t 2,, Mir 3aIIo1i.ss' z
 What was he doing P,
 sSrnoki4lg.' ssDid yon speak to flir11?,,
 tsYes said Hello, MT. saliou.' and he said Hello [
 .sYou're sure this was five or ten minutes past 1922
 s.Yea
 There was no oss-exa4nination and the state closed.
 MT Phillips then began the open ing argument for the state.
 ssIt is 1nInateriaI that the defendant in this case is a woman. Your duty Is just the same as if the defendant were a man, z said MT. Phillips in opening. You ara to be- governed by the evil dence, and by the evidence I mean noe the unimportant. trivial things but the essential facts- z
 MT. Phillips then went into the tes- timony of state witnesses. He held that 1t was immaterial whether wit nesses testimony before the coroner and in the trial coincided as to yer ibage The substance Of the conyersa- tions, as related by witnesses, were the same, he he1d.
 He then went into a review of the events leading up to Ballou's death, as adduced by the testimony. His argument was not completed when recess was taken for lunch.
 Attorney Phillips resumed his argu- ment after the noon recess.
 There was an increased attendance this afternoon3 sheriR volImer and his