The sun., 1915-05-22
APPELLATE COURT DECISIONS
Complete List Handed Down ny
First Department Division.

me toAoNlNg DECISIONS were handed
down yesterday by the Appellate
Division, First department:
In tn" matter Of Michael ! Gsr,'u.
order modined a. directed In opinion and
as modified affirmed with costs to tho
respondent. opinion by clarke. J. Set,.s
Austin II. Fletcher et a.. as executors
Sc arpellant,, ". John MacGinness. re-
~pouicnt judgment reversed with cos:s
ana demurrer sustained with costs. wi:h
',tNe 80 hct"ndan; 90 serve amended an,
tn tho oour; below. opinion BY i.aughhn
Na,han VI, Gunsburs, respondent. v.
Lut".g littIuer. smp'ealci. sc, appellant.
Judgment affirmed with costs. No opin-
ion. order filed.
J. Hlmpden pouEherty, appellant, ",
Tho C!iy of Now Nork, respondent. Judg
men, and orter arirmei with costs 80
opinion. order h.od.
lser, appellant. Judgment reversed and
defendant di.,harged. opinions 10y scott
J.. and insrahein, r J lnsrahan,. =. j.
Isaac Fishman. appellant. - wtlliin
Raumstein. resrondent Determination az
hrmSd .s,a MN so,. ,.s s2a i9Stm,n, 10 G?
complain; wl'h costs. 40 opinion. order
Aired M!cs,o. appellant, w CONNER.
c.t Union Assurance Company, Ii, %
l'. fan. EnE.'r'. 'p'n'""' order ~
lr'n.. VITA D'sis. 80 opinion. order
Elva-4 Er'rlcv. respondent, ~ Th,m,.
m ro N, .Erpg.h g,, I1lGm,n, anin,, ", nrI,t
ham = ). a..'sca,,ns o" a.-,en,!ns op'n'
charlie ~tmu ,ppe an. ~ weun-mer
Fro, inrorp,ra'ea. and Pa,eu, SraroId,ng
company, Respondent. Judgments a..
nrmGl wth co,'. y, or!n."n ~ .c'arks
Bro., lr", amt voting for arirmancs)
settle order on Notice
The T. y. Gross company. respondent
~ Albany Insurance COMPANY. app"'-
.tr' Judgment and ori'f Huirm"d with
''.'s 40 opinion order Ned.
,~. Aachcn y Munich Fire Insurance COM
ut'N. appellant. Juismcn' and order ~
urmci with costs. No opinion order
h,l ..,-
spondrnn '- Federal Mall y General EN,
p,.sS .nmptn'' aPr'Itn, InIsm"n' ann
"rd'r reversed ana new 'rih ordered WIN
costs 70 appellant - .hid' event ur'c.s re-
pondrn' s,ipu.air- to redncr NGfdict to
,G' ,,r i1n "f 500, IN wh'gh rNem' 'nn ladt
'ln" -. tfhfin"i wi'hnUi costs y" "pln-
ION. SOU" "iI"r on noors' ,,.,
i,usr",, root on heh.1 of himsrr'
respondents, Judgment "'nin'd Win
costs 10 opinion. order h''t
coz. SH'' y, onntor SSit 'u4sn,.nt ,tnrm'd Win
N',Ic M,'s'e' - edmlniS'r9trIN &c, re
r,p"'"'....,.,,n u,- I,' HTW ,",k ,,m,ral
lu9fnnnt ani order re,cr;cd with costs
~ p'l .uf,ah Itnsh.'n' j dis ssof N <
an, N',,hs I'' 'n'tuLhne
d, ~ i,r,"p g. npr, ANY " Hr''ur \
,',"S' ~" 49,. W. .'',rr. harrN ". RON 70
rt,ri h., mann . hutnrs t'sp"nnen,N
'u,S ,n'u's anu o'Ht's d'utihed on INC
au."'f nI tnp'T = N'hs'',h, = y '
luE imam ana ihushIn D.
",n'ns 'turr n'e1. -,
., !n..A' ', h"r ON, respondent. Nf w.
,Ni on ~ g. ~ app'Nins. Judgment
,i,,. ',n.' rto'rsan 1hn new irla, ordered
MIn '"NIN ~ Hpp""an's 10 hhlde event
,,'n'"lnn ~, curlan' ,i'aushun ana scott.
80 Ing ana 'o'lhs Tor athrmancel
!, ..
y" I't'""t,m N"Ne-'lS.ns 20 rrspon'
'n. ~ Ndt o., ~ :, EN- Mhrh1ine, Inc.
appe"2i,his' .i,ns ,nuer a'hrmei WIN Slo costs
81, "''''Se"rn's' NO oplhion' order
"'H /. rt,.. ,
r',' f., lg''', r,Sn"nd'h, vs. sun IN
,m'' ,rI'' apprl am pe'tIw'naIon
r,sr. any jnnEiu'nl or Mnnl'lpiI Court
- U'.u N',n .roslS IN ,h'' 'nuri ana IN
iNpp' - orH, 4" ihr I,t'ndan'' NO
'P,u'"u H'.'.c oiu.r ON hntlr".
IN me ma,t 3f fet"r Houser, decd.
,tu"'' .,'eisv' WIN 'ns's ~ appellant IN"
'rs, T"' ~" Fnpnu.nen ~ petitioner
nnNN,,rH ~ Ihe hrshNNr' IN" second In
Tho People. Nr.. RESPONDENT vs N.,h,,
~ n,,t,'i,r '''nr-iio- az, t's"'h' "'trh'l