Lincoln County leader. [volume] (Toledo, Lincoln County, Or.) 1893-1987, 1915-02-05
Lincoln County Leader
OFFICIAL COUNTY PAPER
COLLINS & HAYDEN, Pubs.
SUBSCRIPTION RATES
One Year $l.50
Six Months 10
Three Months ~ 30
COURT DOCKET

'or the regular term of Circuit
Court which con, ened here last
We give the name Of
plaintiff with his attorneys, the
defendant and his attorneys and
suit, action, etc., and
he disposition made Of the case
BY the Court.
Willamina State Bank-Haw-
Isins & McCluskey VS.. e. T. Ra-
oior. Action. Continued.
Walker & Lebow-Hawkins &
McCluskey VS.. William Jorgen-
son. Action. Continued.
John Hamar-W. E. Gwynn VS..
Geo. T. Eglin. Action. Contin-
ued.
w. M. Dodson & e. e. Cook
Hawkins Sc McCluskey VS.. A.
Kangiser. Action. Dismissed.
John Uluila-Hawkins & Nc
Cluskey VS.. John Kentta. Act
ion. Continued.
Matt Rinta-G. B. McCluskey
VS.. John Kentta. Action. Con-
tinued.
Lora Robinson-Joseph Man
nix, Gwynn & Clark VS. William
Robinson. Divorce Dismissed.
Henry Shreyer-Hawkins &
McCluskey VS.. Mary Shreyer-O.
Middlekauff. Divorce. Decree.
Lincoln County Oregon, by
Bert Geer, Sheriff.. F. Stewart
VS.. J. P. Abernethy, ct al. Suit.
Default and decree.
Lincoln County Oregon, by
Bert Geer, Sheriff.. F. Stewart
VS.. J. P. Abernethy, ct al. Suit.
Default and decree.
2. H. Davis-E. E. Wilson, VS.
Melvin Achenbach. Suit. De-
cree of foreclosure.
w. L. Morgan-Manghum &
Manghum vs. Marie T. Cockrell,
ct al,-W. L. Cooper. Suit. De-
cree of foreclosure.
Mary Allen-Hawkins & Nc
Cluskey VS.. John Allen-Gwynn &
Clark. Divorce. Decree.
State Of Oregon-J. F. Stewart
vs. Neles Seigel, Guy Hayes and
willard Doty-Gwynn & Clark.
Indictment. Dismissed. ~
State Of Oregon-J. F. Stewart
vs.. w. M. Berry-McFadden &
Weatherford. Indictment. Dis
missed. .,s, stt
VIM. Brown-J. F. Stewart vs..
Lee Searcy. Foreclosure. De-
fault decree for plaintiff.
B. ]. Hawthorne-J. F. Stewart
VS.. w. +. Wood. Foreclosure.
Default and decree for plaintiff.
B. J. Hawthorpe-J. F. Stewart
VS.. Unknown. Foreclosure. De-
fault and decree for plaintiff.
Margaret /. Brown-Gwynn &
Clark VS.. John l.. Brown. Suit.
Continued.
The Gauld Co. .-Edw. ]. Clark,
Peters & Turner vs.. ]. H. H.
Anderson. Action. Default and
judgment for plaintiff.
w. r. Laidlaw-F. J. Lichten-
berger & Edw. ]. Clark vs. An
drew Story, Thos. Fremster and
S. l.. Riley, ct al. Suit. Order
confirming sale.
Corvallis & Eastern r. r. Co.
w. d. Fenton vs.. ]. r. Brown
Action. Continued.
A. w. Morgan-J. F. Stewart
vs. Moses Lane, ct al. Forclos.
/! ure. Default and decree fol
plaintiff.
Remington Typewriter Co..
Frederic H. Whitfield vs.. Toledo
Lumber Co. & Geo. w. Moor,
Lumber Co. Action. Judg
ment.
l.. w. Williams-B. F. Jones We
Leonard I. Butterfield, ct al. Ac
tion. Dismissed.
Maids Paabo-E. s. Smelling va
Anton II. Hansen. Action. Con
tinued.
Mary A. Day-A. o. Condit vs.
Chas. e. Parrish, ct al Suit
Default and decree for plaintif
s. e. Coffin-Hawkins & Nc
Cluskey vs. Clari l. Coffin. Sui,
Default and decree.
L. f. Parson-Hawkins & Nc
Cluskey vs. Donald Flannery
Suit. Continued.
r. c. Winant-Gwynn & Clar'
vs.. M. F. Depew. Foreclosur
Of tax lien. Dismissed.
Noble Felix, ct al-Edw. {.
Clark vs.. Lusy Gardner, ct vii
Suit. Continued.
r. p. Goin-Hawkins & Nc
Cluskey vs.. John Mannix, Mar
Mannix and Harold Anderson
Action. Default and judgmen
for plaintiff.
r. N. Warnock-G. b. McClus
key VS.. ]. b. Miller, ct al. Ac