The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1915-05-29

respondent. VS. Flny-Nlnth street Realty
Company. appellant. order anirmed. with
$40, costs ana disbursements. No opinion.
Mimi" A Cary. appellant. vs. Arthur L.
Cary, respondent. order modified as stated
n opinion. and "a moIined affirmed with
out costs Opinion per curtain. Settle
order on notice.
John d Rishell. respondent. We. Frank
yersc1. with $40 costs and dishurscments
ard motion granted 20 tho extent stated In
opinion opinion per curtain. Settle order
Tho T~rcdcnnick Company. respondent.
v, National Bridge. Company. appellant.
order affirmed. with SO costs and dis
Josiah j. white respondent. vs.. Harry
: Aaron and another, appellant, Order
ments. No opinion. order nlsd.
Raraele conte. appellant vs. Rosina
cont. respondent 0Faer "n'Fmed' No
Refine Conrad. respondent, We. Lewis
rg6,tihinT company. spnsi!an, order az
No opinion. order n,ed.
LiOWs" cSn,r,MGt'Dg GsmP%n oD wypPsi'
costs and disbursements No opinion.
Henry ii. Leversston. respondent. VS..
Lamb Publishing COMPANY e. al, appel,
lah's. Order affirmed, with SO costs anl
di.hursements. No opinion. order fled.
william " Wood. appellant, vs. WI
lam II. Barnard. respondent order at
nr'ned, with $40 costs and disbursements.
30 opinion Order MED.
Mary =. Miller, appellant, VS. Helen J..
NJ. Robinson. respondent. order al
nrmed, with $40 costs and disbursements
No opinion. order fled,
The People vs. John r. Bradley. Mo
lion granted. order lied.
BENJAMIN Gcrshandon rs. New York
Conso.ilated Raj road company. Motion
to dismiss appeal from Judgment granted
and motion "a dismiss appeal from order
Louisa Frlbourg VS.. Em,grant Industrial
savings Bank Motion granted unless
appellant complies with terms stated in
George L. Fleming VS.. Jessie n. Bacon.
Motion sranted, with $40 costs. Order
,io SSi'f raackins company SaHSsH Motion %ts'' gained
wirh SO costs. order Ned.
Insurance Company, Motion TO dismiss
appeal granted unless appellant com
same VS.. Same, Motion 20 vacnt. stay
denied, without costs. Settle order on
Hugo IL Piescn We. Mary f Mitchell,
ct al Same " same Motions granted
snIGsf Sppsiis.' G S2mPae s,. T''h terms
AnEle'ea Weeks VI. intcrborouGh Rand
TTTaHsit COMPANY ana an0,her; ANITA
Motions granted, orders aIod.
Edwin c. Cooper vs.. Isaac Sorove,
Motion granted unless appellant con.
BAAfN a. % 80 $50 OfA'
sussman Goldreyer vs.. Morris shalita.
Application denied, with $40 costs, order
signed.
EbNng Brewing Company VS. Hermins
Peter Application denied with $40 costs
Roscoe X. ingalls, VS.. Hammond TYPE.
writer. COMPANY Application denied,
Mayor, Lane & Co, vs.. Commercial In
surance Company. Application q rsnted
Harry j. fitzgerald Va, Walter C,
Ee.!y, Application granted Order
Same VS., Same, Motion for stay
Adolph Kugel vs. os'ro Construction
Company, Application denied, with 80
costs, order signed.
same. VS., SINE, Motion denied, with
Ktthr.ue G. Gould vs. Howard Gould.
Motion denied, with so costs, order
Eugeniee Mayors VS. wNiam NJ. Bar
rct' Motion denied with $40 costs Order
Morltz Waiter Va. Katherine q. Far
roll. Motion denied, with 40 costs, Order
Alei.
sumpad H.. sarafan VS.. United States
Fidelity \ Guaranty Company. Same W.,
SANE. Nations denied. with 80 costs,
Locomobils Company VS. Edwin Mich
Gls. Motion denied with so costs or
Paul orth ct al, VS.. Max II Kaeschc
1T al. Motion '0T frs,tt!cTeat 7 -arted
Ses Moses s'dsF " nSii'y e. lou,. RIOS. Mo.
tiun denied. with $40 costs, order hled.
Harry Levine ct al, vs., Harry Orout-
Hen ct al Motion for stay granted, with
Matter ~ BENJAMIN Ieder, Referred TO
Hon. Roger A, Pryor. official referee, Set
tie order on notice.