The menace. [volume] (Aurora, Mo.) 1911-1920, 1915-10-23

Iohstroh, probation ofhccr. The latter
was ordered 70 bring the girl from the
institution 10 appear a. . witnoss before
the grand Jury nov In session. Reaching
the girl = home on York street, she asked
20 be permitted 10 secure some clothing
MrL Lohstroh says that while the
girl 3 mother was Engaged In placing the
clothes, her charge asked 10 be excused
10 get something % eat In the Kitchen.
After waiting some time Mra LohSiroh
was informed that the girl had left
through a rear door and escaped. The
probation ofiiecr gave chase and calling
on pedestrians 20 assist her a crowd was
soon In pursuit. The sherifI's Office was
called up and Probation Oficer John
Meyers, with several deputies, hastened
70 the scene. Dr. James Dighy caught
the girl At Ninth and Hamlet streets and
awaited the arrival Of Mrs. Lohs,roh.
The grand jury desired her A. a witness
in the case Of Carl Castor, who il held
in the sum Of 5000 10 answer a charge
of assault The girl was sentonced by
Judge BoltI 20 the Home Of the Good
shepherd until she is 81 years Of age
Cincinnati TimeI-Star, Oct. 9, 1915.
Here is another instance Of
Romish deyiltry. IL is an estab-
lished fact that Houses Of the Good
Shepherd are private prisons. II
is an established fact that Rome
bitterly opposes public inspection
and in some instances has even
threatened to meet inspection COM
mittees with armed resistance
should they attempt 10 invade the
PRIVACY Of such an institution.
II is known that these institu-
tions are untaKed and that they arc
in reality well equipped laundries
coming in direct competition with
licensed, taxed and inspected laun-
dries doing a legitimate business in
a Legitimate way.
II is known that they do not pay
these slaves for their services other
than to provide board and clothing
of the cheapest kind.
IL is known that those committed
10 these private prisons are kept
within the walls behind locked doors
and forced to do hard labor for the
private profit Of the Roman Cath
olic church.
Il is known that the public re-
ceives no revenue from them and
that no public interference with the
conduct Of the places is tolerated by
the keepers.
HOW, THEN, CAN THEY BE
CONSIDERED AS OTHER
THAN OUTLAW INSTITU-
TI0NS WITHOUT PUBLIC
SANCTION OR OFFICIAL
RECOGNITION?
THE MENACE has given publicity
to the escapes, commitments and
cruelties connected with Houses Of
the Good Shepherd and urged that
no public official who is in any way
responsible for the continuation Of
this blot upon American civiliza-
ton be permitted to serve in any
public capacity after his connection
with the diabolical slave system Of
Rome is discovered.
We will continue to blazon these
incidents to the world and shall ever
denounce as dangerous and despi-
cable any person OF influence coun-
tenancing these hell-holes as places
Of incarceration.
Each state and county has, OR
SHOULD HAVE, its houses Of
detention and correction, owned,
controlled and conducted by the
state or county. Patriotic Ameri-
cans should protest with voice and
with ballot against such outrageous
practices as the above clipping has
given a limited publicity.
1t will be noted that the victim
in this case was q mere child, vet
in attempting escape she was pur-
sued by a crowd Of deputy sheriffs
who sought to return her to the
slave pen after her testimony was
given to the grand jury. Six years
Of servitude to Rome was the sem
tence imposed upon her BY judge
who is possessed of even less Of the
spirit Of charity than the heartless
and outlaw masters to whom he
gave the frail form Of a young girl.
When these instances Of papal
connivance with courts creep into
public print we are led to believe
that Rome has a secret agreement
with her tools who sit as judges in
criminal, probate and juvenile
courts BY which the helpless ones
are given over to Rome. No judge
with q heart in his breast would
sentence a child to a public insti.
tuition for so long a term as sir
years. To send a moral delinquent
into penal servitude to such a des-