The enterprise. [volume] (Harlem, Mont.) 1899-1926, 1915-07-22
DISTRICT COURT PROCEEDINGS.


ocurt convened TUESDAY, July 18TH,
the following court officers being
present: Frank N. Utter, presid-
ing Judge; c. o. Tegnall, court re
porter; Allen l.. Shaw, sheriff; D.
F. McGrath, county attorney; r. e.
O'Keefe, associate attorney: c. NJ.
Porter, clerk, and Isaac Murphy,
baliff.
This being the first jury term in
and for Phillips county, Hon. f. n.
Utter, the presiding Judge, COM
plimented the new county and lhe
purchasing board on the splentl |
room and furnishings for court pltr-
poses.
A jury was ordered drawn.
Before drawing jury, c. L.
Stevens, attorney for Alfred Donev,
defendant in cas- eNo %, set for
trial at this term presented a mo-
ton and objected to the calenda. as
set on the grounds that various
state cases were placed on the cal
endar out of their order of liliug.
Motion overruled. The clerk was
instructed to draw jury.
A motion was offered bv the
county attorney preying that where
do IiAC VI l6IAul COPy VI Ll0 jury lloI
as prepared by the jury commission
had been destroyed that the carbon
copy of said original jury list now
on the files of the court, be subst;-
tuted and treated as the original
list.
c. M. Porter. clerk of the court,
was sworn and testified touching
the validity of said jury list.
Roy Lee, county assessor was
sworn and testified.
The motion was granted. >.
State of Montana VS.. Alfred Don
ey The above entitled action was
called. The defendant, Alfred Dor
ey, being in court with his attor-
neys. c. H. Stevens and Dignan &
Borton.
The clerk proceeded to draw a
jury and the following talismen
were drawn from the jury box No.
w. A .spiller, E. B. stublefeld,
D. l.. Baird, John F. Boswell, B. F.
Brown, Andrew Davidson, Phillip
D. Simser, Vern w. Vaupel, Herman
LIGHT, VIM. H. Frazer, J. A. Testu,
j. H. Welty.
At this time a challenge to the
PANEL was offered by the defendant
and filed.
"A denial and objection was inter-
posed by the county attorney.
The court allowed the sufficiency
of the challenge and allowed the de-
NAL to be entered.
Roy Lee, county assessor, was
sworn and testified in above action
continued to $3.50 a. M, July 14th.
Carl j. Brandon VS.. r. A. Samp-
son. In the above action demurrer
was submitted and taken under adj
visement.
Schmitz VS.. Smith. Motion of
plaintiff for additional bond is sub
mitted and denied.
]. A. Crowder VS.. VIM. Spencer
This case came on for hearing on
demurrer to amend complaint. Mo-
ton was taken under advisement.
At 5 p. m. adjournment was TAX
en- to $3.50 a. M, July 14th.
Nine-thirty a. m, July 18th.
Same court officers present.
Peter St. Amour VS.. Florence j.
St. Armour. This action came on
regularly for hearing. Peter st.
Armour with his attorney, L ".
Beauline, in court The defendant
having been regularly served with
process and having failed to appear
either in person or by attorney and
answer to the complaint. and the
time allowed by law having expired
the default of said defendant is
hereby duly entered. Peter St.
armour, plaintiff, was duly sworn,
and testified in above case. A de-
cree of absolute divorce was issued
in open court.
State of Montana VS.. Alfred Don
ey. Alfred Doney, defendant, and
his attorneys. c. H. Stevens and
Dignan and Borton We're present in
court. At 1905 a recess was taken
to 1870 p. m.
One p. M, July 14th. Open court
Same court officers present as fore
noon of this date.
State of Montana vs.Alfred Don
ey. B. H. Cottrell assessor for
Valley county, was duly sworn and
testified in above case.
2:40 p. m. recess was taken to
3:45 p. m. of same date.
3:45 p. m. The case of State of
Montana vs. Alfred Doney was con-
tinued
w. H. Frazier and Frank H.Whit-
ing being duly sworn and testified
in above action.
w. H. Taylor was duly sworn and
testified in above action.