The Pensacola journal. (Pensacola, Fla.) 1898-1985, 1915-06-05
Kills Commission Bin,
Then Makes Suggestions.


r. another column 6 Published
communication from Representative
william Hmtenhuch. who proudl
chains re distinction ~ having
+ nailed 70 tho cross" peasacola's port
commission BIN II which Mr. Hurten-
bach enumeratss 81 leneIh what should
have been eontsInsd ln the measure
proposed
Bfr. Furtenbach says three commits
ssonaru are nat enouah and that
would require eve t7 property handle
thls business. forFstuns that in "naG-
inw the eln co the croaa" be has left
The same business "a the hands u
three men who already have he man
mwement of many city departments en-
their hands but Il be believed that
I'VE instead - three should have
formed this board why ga ne not -
amend the bIn instead 81 mailing Il
20 the crasaF
Mr.. Hurtenhach further objected r.
ths measure because it had no clause
prohibiting port commissioner from
becoming Interested Ia any contract
Jet or concerning any work done IN
fartherance az tbe object CO this btu
ard someone should have the right 70
investigate the acts af the port com
mission Section 2a e inc city char
ter prohibits auv city ofcial or cm-
rloye from being interested In any
contract while the city commission
ers. appointing IRE port commissioners
would naturally have she right g call
FIR an accounting Hat f these sec
lions ~ the cts charter did pot fully
cover the matter why did not Mr.
Hfurtenbaeh insert them as amend
ments. Instead 81 mailing II 10 the
oroaa
Mr Hutenhaeh saws ..rhe bin
further acEsd provision requiring
publication ~ aay contracts involving
me expenditure. saw. 81 81 10000 CT
moro e TIE lowest bidder" The city
charter already contains a clause re-
curing publication 81 contracts % $500
ar more. but II Hr IIurteubaeh deemed
Il inuumclent why dld De- not amend
80 measure instead o. mailing it q
the CROSSE
aThe port commission ~ Tampa
SAYS SIR Hurtcn6ach are subject 20 re-
moval - the Affirmative vote q two
thirds 81 tho members of the cts
council cancufred in by the mayor
There vas 10 such provision IN The
Pensacola bin" Then why did YOU
not insert such q provision Alr Hur-
tsnbact7 why proudly proclaim =
killed the bul"
Under the Tampa charter,~ eontin-
ues ar nurtenhnch. ethero are sever
members appointed II 1913 ~ TIE
HmsbUrouEh delegation. shereafte'
elected directly by the people thei1
compensation beius 500 annually IN.
stead u $500 ~ sou wanted ~
Pensacola port commissioners electef
~ tho aEscambia delegation" wh1
didn't you orer such q substitute Mr
Hurtonbach2 And why ana you no
change the bin 50 their annual salar
isa would have been 9t0o instead o
tsoog II was II your power 10 DO 50
Ter you demonstrated it when yoi
snaiied the hlu 60 the cross.~
~. Hurtenbach states the auallH
cations ~ the board which were; Tia
one should be an exporter ~ fvo year
experience and doing business annu
ally 81 zone million" according 90 81
FEunonhach bus 90 Tho Journal !
correct Il vas 500 geo per year. e.
second q ship ascent or hroker who's
annual charters should not be les
than $4,000 tons per yasr and che thF
mar who should have a tharour
trawladEe On che floating Of BONDS
indebtedness.
Nr Hrterharh does NOT state VIII
affections he has ta such qualities
fsrs. bar N Be had any he shou
nave vo.esd them GA a. effort 60 amer
tra measure so that D. vaua beta
.s-e. ere ends COR which 90 was intsg
a.a RE could have amended an of 4
srona haA ne wished and secured q
passage q MESSAGE which the Hs'
rsa ~ Pensacola desired instead
spauinp Il % fire cross
- seems nat ar. Hureuhsch a
waited rather iats 10 voice Dis q.
ssrtans 6 tae measure. IF he b
81 Ae iasas which Be states IN q
.smmualcsuoa De should have maj
.s.n known before now it Is ther
-. auabls go suppose tfat VIII
=, utsnaaeh said 81 h.a FIRST cor
shot Mayor Greenh
49, - ask me % pass ne 1
.-n fbe hoaae h- sisted enc en
49, wrs &c nai.td &c % tbe cr9s|