Western Kansas world. [volume] (WaKeeney, Kan.) 1885-current, 1915-04-03

ls$$Sz3 y$$3$5$$$3$$33$3S$l can see how the
men of Sodom
Is illustrate large
-. number of people
today. They are those whose under
lying principle might be termed liv-
ing for self alone. They do not care
for real religion, but are occupied en-
tirely with the things of time and
sense. What they will eat today or
what they will wear tomorrow is to
them vastly more important than how
they will stand before God in the
future. Their effort is concerned with
this life alone, and they live and work
and play as though there were no such
thing as eternity and no such person
as God. They come to the end like
the man who told himself he could re-
tire from business because he had
much goods laid up for many years
and he could now afford to enjoy the
fruits of his toll and eat, drink and
be merry. But he had laid up all his
goods on the earth; they were not
taken from him, but he was taken
from them, and it is no wonder the
Lord says he was fool. The class
under consideration are not neces-
sarily bad people, for usually they are
tolerant of religion, as the people of
Sodom did not mind having Lot in
their midst. But the religion that
Lot had was not very insistent. When
it would threaten to interfere with
business or with pleasure it must not
be heard. 1t was time then to laugh it
out of court as a sort of fable, and
when it became personal Lot was to
Living for Self and God.
The second picture is that of Lot, in
w he ha Sc
easily seen. This man illustrates
those who seem to have, as the under
lying principle of life, the idea of liv-
ing for self and for God too. They at
tempt to serve two masters. and, fail
| ing to serve either, come to the end
with nothing to show for their labor.
They trust their own vision and live
| by sight and not by faith Lot looked
| on the well-watered plain and, as far
| as he could see, it was the very thing
| he ought to have, the very thing that
| was best for him. But, as God saw,
it was the very thing he ought not to
have, the thing that was worst for
him. He hazarded everything he had
or hoped to have-himself, his family,
his proportion what he could see
with his own eyes. when he might
have chosen what God could see. He
trusted himself rather than God and
the results were inevitable. He lost
what God would have given him and
he lost the enjoyment the men of
Sodom had; for all the time he was
there his righteous soul was vexed.
He was neither out and out for self
nor out and out for God. He had tried
to live for God and self. he had tried
| to serve two masters and to get both
/ Of nd
of God. But he ended with awful dis
aster. losing his property, his testi-
mony, his family-all that he had.
Living for God.
The last picture is that in which
the "out-and-out" Christian is seen in
| Abram- The underlying principle of
his life seems to be that he had made
up his mind to serve God alone He
was far from being d perfect man. Re
made many mistakes and even com
mitted some sins But underneath he
was living for God. He had learned
thou shalt have no other God before
| me" and his life was governed by
this principle He recognized that he
could serve only enc master with any
hope of success and he chose to have
the Lord as that one Master. What
he was and had and hoped to be be
1 AOHS0u 10 L1Adl AdSLGT 10 uOs Win dS
the Master desired Where he was
to be and go depended on that Mas
ter's direction He would not lean to
his own understanding nor Judge by
the sight of his eyes nor walk by his
own wisdom He would gladly take
the seeming second best from GOD. be-
lieving that whatever appearances
might say. they could not tell the
whole truth
The men of Sodom lived for sell
alone and lost themselves and all they
had: Lot lived for self and God and
lost all he had of peace or power OIL
property; Abram lived for God alone
and. while he was not perfect man
there was given TO him the peace OF
God and power for God and posses
sions from God Choose We this day
whom ye will serve"