Amarillo daily news. [volume] (Amarillo, Tex.) 19??-current, 1915-03-13
NOTED DIVORCE
CASE N CANADA
CIVIL COURTS ATTEMPT 10 SIT
TIE CASE WHICH OEIGl.
MATED N CHURCH.

MONTREAL. owe. Nar I2--
Another TRIP 20 ENGLAND mu.t be
made by the lawyers interested in
the famous Tremhly divorce case,
which has agitated the religion and
cyil authorities oi the Province %
Quebec. for the past siy years For
the Privy Council 81. st.ll 40 SEQ on
some OF The points involved boz the
remarkable case. Last Nav the law
yers argued the case before tno Jus
diClal Committee of the priNy Coun-
cii. setting forth tho issrrs involved.
The highest court of The British
Empire s called upon 20 decide
whether woman Whn marr.cd
man claimed 90 be- her relative IN
tuo fourth degree OF oonsantuin'iy
eau be- protected from 60 decree au-
milling tho marriage
Napoleon Tremhiay, farm 'r. ana
Valvina Despa,ie Roman catholics.
we're married d. th air pastor tho
Rpy J. % Rraudy iH tho parish nt
$40. Nict0irc in the Diocese of ST.
Uyacintha. on October -. lHol. Ne
t.r they had lived together Tor cy-
oral wears tho wife lei her husband
end went 20 live iu She l1iicd
sf1tes
ON MAY lG. lnoa he husband
made application 90 tb. c..lo"'H 'IcM
authorities for thr annulmr1' nt hH
warria-c on the ground chat 'h' con-
.HfciIe pgftics were related 1 me
fourth decree. tlI couNlt1tue an
INN .dim,nt fo ttr msrr.rrr accord
.U ta On Canon Hu u. iu" taman
rptHulia church Of thH relation hlp
/ rIamh.ay q e'ar,I Iu hl hd mo-
/ luoul.Ieo ut iNn imr oi fhr mar
r..4,.
/ ON Frhmury fH. 1910. ~ 0.gI'f-
.a.tieal court. rrnrD utIu. ih' ii o.
900 Df So H4aDulnn found Chat such
|r..aticuship had Seen established
lrou iu, urCof shown. AND prouon-
/ .d tIc marras null aud Fo'L u'
dI.r.I.aii0u hltir. boon Sought %"
/ moot Too coueugI.nity existing
Iu %, SUPERIOR Court of th' Disc
uict ol RirhslI.u. ~ @or,l. iH DC
/ l0ber. f9l0. Nr us'icr lrua'au
save Judgment pron1uuc.nr The
/ r1rriage NUN and void without civil
| o. legal effect
umhinr block Was iatcr enc
/ .ruutorcf hv lho husband LAWYERS.
/ hen tho Court OF z, i.W 900 Non
i4pal. Sin Melbourne TAFT ana Ius-
/ fcos Fortm an1 Ncreicr preceding.
T .prnl Chat CO., proof submitted hN
/ nUo plaium Nas Illegal Wl n nlii-
/ ..at hc not having proven tNo re-
/ Urious mitb OF tur defendant legal
Dr., mo relationship between himself
and d. wife. The Cour, 0f Review
] therefore reversed th' decision.
/ Irsii,c nruuD.u aeaiu heard me
case and again rendered tho Iudg-
mont anuulliug lhc narria.'. a'l in
4 November l9le. tho court of Re
| ,i-u uphold him
Two years ago this month the
Court ct Review ar8uted Goo the wife
/ NaNna Ucspatio. fh' right go appeal
to mo Priyy Council from their
Judgment auuull,1r the marriage
bets .pu hgr and TremhaN Al.
/ thoueh her appeal must avHiu Nc ar
/ rusl she .s hopeful that 'ho mar
Irac. win hc held 20 ha legal under
.f.. ritu Code % QueboD
The cas-. D.. oI lre1t iu'orD On
.'ND roHlious factions OF the P~or-
Iucp. tor heretofore ,h, ccccl-ia-ti-
/ .I nvs have been raoe ni1oi iu al'
] iuilar cases. ln oIJpr to Wa. l'aiu
. Nei l.sH status as Trnmblur'- wife
Irlc defendant bon the disroca gciion
| willing Co ask THE church iOr a
. disren.ation and remarr, TrcmulaF
She ha. fought for many years io
1ptaiu her position as fhr legally
welded wife oft Tremhlay. and say.
.fs niu r0utW, io deW u thc
/ British courts