Sequachee Valley news. (Sequachee [Sequatchie], Tenn.) 1896-1952, 1915-04-08
FIFTH REPLY TO
JUNGLE TOM. ("
Men, Not God. Imputed Father
Adams Sin to All His Pos.
terity. God is Against
1t.

To prove above, we adduce follow
ing proofs.
I. On the importation of the faith
er's sin to his children God says: Sin
those days they shall say no more, the
fathers have eaten q sour grape and
the children's teeth are set on edge
But every one shall die for his own
iniquity: every man that eateth the
sour grape, his teetn shall be set on
edge "-Jel emiah 81 :29 and 80. And
as Adams sin consisted of eating for.
hidden fruit, we know God did not,
nor does not nor will not, impute his
eating Gin to his posterity, so as that
they have to be cleansed Of his sin,
for God here says: ''For everyone
shall die for his Own iniquity -
Verse 30
OF this same matter God thru
Ezekiel to Israelites said: What mean
ye, that We use this proverb," Thy
wcrd) Concerning the land of Israel,
saying, the fathers have eaten sour
grapes, and the children's teeth are
set on edge AS / live, saith the Lord
God, ye shall not have occasion any
more to use this proverb," (by-wordl
sin Israel Behold, all souls are
so the soul Of the son is mine: the
soul that sinneth. it shall die. !" (Eze-
kiel 1924 These Scriptures In Jere- |
miah and Ezekiel makes it very clear |
that neither God nor His prophets |
never did impute Father Adams sin,
nor the sins of any other fathers TO |
his or their posterity in any sense, bat
that it was done only by uninspired
lost, wicked, skeptical men, and God
say they shall no more say it, when
He makes the New Covenant with
them, and IN as much as Tom Carrick
now says it, it Is positive proof that
sod has never made 1t with him, that
be is yet ont of covenant relation with
sod, and therefore only lost sinner.
3 In the New Testament God,
through the inspired Paul says, "Nev-
,rtheless death reigned from Adam to
Moses. even over them that had not
Iinned after the similitude of Adams J
Rom. 5:14, and il Ad-
ms immediate children had not sim
led in Adam, we know his remote
'osterity did not, for they are remov-
d about IS, 900 generations from him, l
ounting three generations to the CEN
ury of 100 years, which Is correct :
verage. So it is clear that Tom Car t
Ick's SO called Atlantic original sin in
8, IS Of wicked, lost sinner men, 10 Z
Tiled into them by Satan, therefore
; Is of the devil and not Of God.
4. God was 1000 years revealing
lis will to us, and never once did He a
yer hint at Adamic sin being impu- b
'd to us, either did He ever hit ut a
aptism in connection with it; nor II
Id He ever even indirectly hint at
sptism Of infants in any way, much 81
50 as its being their regeneration 81
Vt even once. p'
8. "UncleTom. lin order for you to
pport infant baptism. You must pro-
ICE q plain precept for 1t. or clear .
ample OF 1t in the scriptures and "
1 in tradition. as You have done,
d by basing it on tradition as you IL
]. you, as Christ said: "Have re
'de the word of Christ of no effect
rough your tradition. MARX 7:13 N
d are following "vain deceit and -
ditions Of men. Col 2:8 nv
J. agreed to discuss infant bap- re-
m with You, and IL You want to dis TT
10 che Catholic church. 60 to Editor an
N Watson's paper, or the editor Of De
J. Menace OF the editor Of the Vel. dit
' jacket and don't bushwhack an ia,
tor ~ you have tried to do. Don't fla
ife@ above nom de plume and, as i'm
! any man or his paper. but above tir
II own real signature say what you un
70 TO say like o man to bis face, GU
he can know who 10 talking 10 col
q Ii q man speaks the truth, he Tor
'uldn't care for 10 TO appear above cd
|. name. Perhaps you got In the mi
40 Of bnshwhacking back In the rae
lies. and love il so we'll that Il =.
aid nearly take your breath to ot
e IL. up. You OF. any, man who co. o.,
one eye and half sense ought to VA
" that the Catholic Church 10. mot $
INT; baptism, the subject you agreed r.
liscuss With me. Il is unfair and
lonest In any man and contrary to
~ OF debate to spring irrslative s
jects until the one under discus and
has been thoroughly discusssd. bri
only reason Tom Cavrick can In
hfully assign for his depression 10 :
Inows his case 10 lost and that we
D rented him with tbe truth on ev- Joil
point, and he knows 10, unless che wa
u has bis eyes 30 blinded by pYsju- -
shat he can't see Gods truth. To WI
ne irrelative subjects is one OF the y"
l's ways Of trying to dodge Gods
b, as he wants to lead from 1t by
ession and in that way conceal the A
b he so much hates, as be knows u
lie must receive the love Of the *
in order to be saved" Q. Thes. ~
Goods truth is my shield" Y
. 9:14, and not a nom de plume y
"Uncle Tom uses for his name
, can conceal his identity as the
or Of false doctrine.
a w WHITE This