The independent-reporter. [volume] (Skowhegan, Me.) 1909-1955, 1915-02-04
COURT CASES
Which VIII Probably Not BE Tried
This Term

VI the olo vases Ol Tue ClNi uoShCN
many have been continued, among
these being the following: Flora
Gardner VS. L. A Stinchfield; Donelly
VS. General Hydroearbon Co.; Murphy
VS. Hartman Co. and Somerset Worsted
Mills Tr.; F. NJ wilkins vs. F. L.
Bryant and Grace Bryant; f. E. Mayo
VS. Wilson Larabee; Dornberger VS. NJ.
c. r. R.; Mark Savage & Co VS. e. c.
Robinson; Sawyer VS. d. A. Adams and
A NJ. Adams; A Gallagher vs. A. g.
Tracy; f. R Holden vs. S. Newton;
G. E. Moore VS. n. B. Thorne. E. Z
Newcomb and The Linn Wooden Co
rr.; Handy & Reardon, Aplts. VS. W.
II. Watson; Barker VS. Merriman; r.
r. Green VS. ]. P. Prescott; Helen A.
dilton VS. George II. Fletcher, alias
Henry Fletcher, alias G. H. Fletcher
and Harry B. Hilton, alias H. B. Hill
ton; F. T. Palmer vs. w. Robinson;
J. J. Cassidy VS. f. II. Colby; First
National Bank of Skowhegan vs. Som
erset Worsted Mills and Morris Gled-
hill; Poulin and Poulin VS. BARLEY
and Barley Hitchcock VS. Fields.
Hunnewell VS. Hugh Harmon; Webster
vs. Head; A. b. Tracy VS. Lovely and
A. p. Bigelow; Shieve VS. Rolfe,
Weiser VS. Halves; Blaisdell VS. Chas
rozier; Bingham Harness Co., VS. An
derson; Prescott vs. Green; Linnie
Nichols VS. George Curtis; Bean VS. F.
H. Colby; Holt vs. Peavy; Gooch VS.
The Franklin Power Co.; Clark and
Clark VS. c. H. Norton; Grace E. Vose
VS. Mary Russell, alias Mrs. Irwin Rus
sell; Tracy VS. Ed McPheters and Inhs.
of st. Adams TT; Reuben Rhoades
vs. G. c. Jackson and Evelyn Jackson;
Hayford VS. Nutting; f. E. Smith VS.
Helen Beckim; Cooley vs.. Matson and
Matson; j. Corson VS. l.. A Stnchfield;
Patterson VS. Matson S. J. Walton
Admir-. VS. Bass; Sanborn VS. Hilton:
Porter and Porter VS. +. l.. Whitaker
and Edith Whitaker Central Maine
Power Co.. vs. E. E. Whiting and Jose.
phine Whiting; Inhs. of Brighton VS.
Herbert Wyman; M. S. Goodrich VS.
Phoebe Goodrich Exrx.; Bass VS.
Holden (2); Martin VS. Bean; Greene
vs. Harmon; Withee, Col'r. VS. Somer-
set Worsted Co. and Bldgs. and land,
Spear VS. l.. r. Brown; Bean VS. Frank
C. Hanson.
1t was asked by an attorney that the
case of w. E. Clifford VS. Maine Cen
trail Railroad Co. be continued until
the first case of the April term. Among
the cases defaulted was Asa NJ. Gil
man VS. E. A. Merriman; E. D. Blais-
dell VS. Ralph Denning, defaulted by
agreement; F. H. Pease VS. c. M. Hill
ton; Conant EXr. VS. r. A. Conant
Daggett VS. Cushing; Charlotte E. Gri
fin VS. E. d. Sidelinger; E. E. Barker
VS. II. S. Holmes ct ais; +. c. Andrews
VS. Clyde Savage; Central Maine Pow
err Co. VS. l.. r. Brown American Agri.
cultural Chemical Co. VS. F. H. Drake
defaulted by agreement; Bowker Fer
tilizer Co VS. c. f. Dunton; Burke VI
NJ. Webster
Those entered neither party, no fur
Their action were Henderson VS. Kel
logg Lumber Co; Avery vs. H. L. Wy
man and Hattie Wyman; Gordon VS.
Redmond; Horace Purington Co. VS.
l.. G.. Trafton; Parks and Woolson
Machine Co. VS. Somerville Worsteo
Mills; George l.. Shuman & Co. VS.
Eva M. McLeur; Manson and Coolidge
VS. Camp Benson Me. Veterans Assn
Chas. Preble VS. Everett w. Preble,
Simeon Brown vs. Maine Central Rail
road CO.; J. S. Libby VS. P H. Crom-
well, Aplt. and Richard H. Everett anl
NJ. H. Stanhope; Empire Cream Sc
parator Co. VS. Hoxie; w. j. Smith
vs. c. II. Smith and p. J. Hill, surviv-
ing Partners; w. j. Smith VS. The
MoXie Lumber Co. Those recorded
as simply neither party were the cases
of A. futile VS. Fred Tibbetts; Sy-
lyester Jackson. Complt. VS. The
Franklin Power Co. Pittsfield Nation
al Bank VS. Paul Potter; Pittsfeld
National Bank vs. B. w. Potter; Booth
VS. Punty; Z. b. Chase and l.. f.
Jacobs vs. Chas Lashon.