Sequachee Valley news. (Sequachee [Sequatchie], Tenn.) 1896-1952, 1915-04-01
FOURTH REPLY TO
"UNCLE TOM"
His Original Adamic Sin Being lnbred
and Born In alliHfants, and Has TO be
Removed by Baptism Entirely
DisproVed.

l. We all know iniquitv is the
worst species of wickedness in Gods
light as it is "lawlessness, eccleslas-
tically consisting of going off and es.
tablishing a tabernacle, church, OF
ones own. like Korah. Dathan and
Abiram did, Mum 1927, and like
Luther, Calvin, Wesley and Alexan-
Ger Campbell and many others have
done; and like sprinkling people, even
babies, for baptism, without any sort
Of lawful authority for so doing, civ
lily committing murder as do Ku
Klux and all other murdereIs do,
wiaout any authority of law for 80 DO
ing. OF iniqu, ty, lawlessness, Christ
avs: because iniquity," lswless-
ness "sball abound, the love of mary
,hsll wax cold - Matt 24:12. and Of
iniouity God said: "But your iniq-
mites have separated batween you
anI your God. "-Isaiah 59:9, there
fore we know if any sin or sins OF
any kind could so descend from rather
to their children, 80 as to be lnbred
and Unborn in them, 1t surely would
be iniquity, but God virtually to all
irtents and purposes says 1t Is not so
inbred in the children in these words:
Il, the Lord thy God, am jealous
God, visitingthe iniquities OF the faith
r upon the children unto (onlyl
tine third and fourth generation OF
"(only)" them that hate M -Deut
SO. This clearly shows that this in
iquitous sin of the fathers was not in
bred or Unborn in the children, but
vas outside of and away from the
hildreu, for God had to visit it uron
tnem-not in them, and He visited it
anon them only to the third aod
fourth generation and only upon them
mat hated God, and only those 'ort,
% We Just absolutely know that Ad-
im's sin is not inbred and Unborn In
Iur babies who are 10 900 generations
removed from Adam. Uncle Tom.
YOU are badly wrong
II. II, as "Uncle Tom" says, bap-
ism is to remove this Adamic origin
Il sin, aud If, as he indicates, 1t takes
5he place Of circumcision then 1t nee
ssarily follows that Jesus Christ had
. double portion of Atlantic sin In
lin, for He was both circumcised and
Baptized. But Holy Writ of Him
avs: "Yet without sin. Heb 4:15
AMI "That Holy Being born of thee
lall be called the Son of God, -
luke :35, and therefore we know that
ithrr JESUS circumci ion nor His
n tism was or were in any sense to
move His original Auamic sin.
Ieitber does bapti III now remove the
\ annie sin of any child for all "child-
en- begotten and born inside of we'd
h1l 1 NJ
III, If as "Uncle Tom says, bap-
i'm SO remov,s the Aoamic sin as
nat children receiving it, at eight
lys old, as he indicates, can enter
Snto the Kingdom of Heaven, ana
ithout which they cannot, then it
ieces arily, logically anu scripturally
'oilows that all children who died be-
ore circumcision was originated are
ow 10 hell, and all females who died
infancy from then to the days Of
ohm are now in hell, for they were
'@ver circumcised, and all children,
9th males and females, who tave
led in infancy from that day to this
r. nov In hell * EFT the Greek
nurch's infants, for she i, the only
ourch on earth that baptizes her in
ants, for your Catholic Church and all
'sdo-baltist churches only rantize
heirs. The Greek church infants
ion't comprize onefourth of the in
ANTS OF the earth, and so your doc
tripe consigns at least three toulths
4 all dead infants to hell, all because
S1ey we're not BAPTIZED to cleanse them
rom Adamic sin, in the face of the
'act that the bloc of Christ cleanseth
IL from all sin, (Jno t:7,) leaving
none Of any sort for baptism to cleanse
Is from
~. If a. you, "Uncle Tom," say,
Baptism cleanses us from the Adamic
original sin, then it stands to reason
ind common sense tnat We have, of
necessity. to be cleansed from it ere
oe can be Of our own personal sins,
ohicb is contrary to Cornelius and his
ousehold, for Of them Peter, rightly
said: "To Him" Christ,
give all the prophets witness, toat
through His name wbosoever believeth
nto Him nath already completely re-
eived the remission Of sins, Acts
lO:43, for the Greek word, "labine,"
wrongly translated, "shall receive,
future tense, ia 10 Aorist. or past
ense, expressing an action as already
completed That this is right is evi.
fenced by their receiving the Holy
3bost and speaking with tongues.
While Peter was speaking these words,
md b fore they were baptized in wa
er: II You are right. you have the
holy Ghost coming on them and i'm
'arting to them the gift Of tongues
while they were still guilty.of original
in, and before they were cleansed |
rom ii, and this fact is enough to
'onviucs you that you are wholly and
altogether wrong Your declarations
ire nothing short Of blasphemous sac
ilege May you repent so God can
orgive you, is my prayer.
q. W. WHITE,
Tenn.