Western Kansas world. [volume] (WaKeeney, Kan.) 1885-current, 1915-05-22

Professor Beecher gives 1865 B. C.
as the date of this lesson and the
death of Samuel. Saul had been ON
the throne 81 years and David was
twenty-seven years of age. There are
ten famous episodes between the les
son of last week and that of today.
Cd David and the shew-bread; CD
Goliath's sword; CD David feigns
madness (ch. 2D; (4) The cave of
Adulfam; (5) His care of his par
ents; CO. The killing of the priests
(ch. 22); CD Wandering in the will
derness (ch. 23); 60 The cutting of
Saurs robe (ch. 24); 90 Nabal's churl-
ishness. and (10) Abigairs kindness
(ch. 25). 1t might be well to have
one scholar give summary of each of
these events
D. David and Abishai, wv. ST.
Once before, the Ziphites had in
formed Saul as to David's whereabouts
(23:19). Learning that Saul evident
ly intended to follow him into the will
derness (v. A., David sent spies to
learn the exact location of Saul and
the 5000 men under command of Abb
ner. Abner was a cousin of Saul,
brave man with a remarkable history.
Unwittingly they had placed them
selves in David's power. and that for
a second time (24:3-S). Like the
camp of the Midianites which Gideon
visited, Saul and his men were scat
tered about sleeping within the place
of the wagons" ". 5 R. W, with Saul
in the center, the spear marking his
resting place and the bolster beneath
his head. Doubtless Saul trusted Abb
ner's protection, but no arm of flesh
can save or protect sinful man. From
a neighboring rock David and his
friends could distinguish the spear
and the outlines of the camp David's
challenge was directed to both of his
companions Ahimelech, the Hittite,
declined the summons, whereas Abb
shat, David's nephew who had already
proved himself in the affair at the
well Gil Samuel 23:13-16) and later be-
came leading figure in David's king
dom, accepted the challenge.
~. David and Saul, w. s-12.-Abishai
was quite right that God had deliv-
cred Saul into David's hand ". 81, but
he was wrong in his conclusion as to
what that meant. God delivered Saul
that he might, If possible, save him.
1t was a challenge that tested David's
magnanimity, his sense of honor and
also an event wherein he could appeal
to SauIs honor. Abishais anger is
evident from his words, 81 will not
sg,ite him the second time" There
was ample provocation, but David rec
osnized in this experience the hand
OF God, nor would he profit by an
others hand appraised against the
Lords anointed' ". -. A conscience
less keen could have found an excuse
for allowing another to strike blow
to his own profit. Saul was rejected
of Jehovah, yet David preferred to
let Jehovah execute his own DEGREES
(ch. "a; Is CT Ps. 105:15).
III. David and Abner, w. 13-16.-
Returning to his vantage point,
doubtless the brow of hill on the
opposite side of the valley, a point
of safety, David awakened the sleep
ing camp. Abner replied, who art
thou?" This cry sounds strangely like
the present-day replies to the chal-
lenge of our David when a sleeping
camp of sin is aroused. This call
came at night When our King shall
return his visit will be unexpected and
at night q Thess. SPA; Rev. 1919.
1t would seem like humiliation for
this proud, naughty general, Abner, to
be tainted by David (v. 80. AS chief
officer he was responsible for the
kings safety and his life. David
therefore might well reproach and
chide him, for his lack of fidelity was
worthy of death. When Saul was
thoroughly awake to the fact OF
David's visit to his camp and the fact
that his life had been spared, he was
moved to another one of his moments
of repentance wv. 17-2D.
w. The Result, w. 17-25.-David's
address to Saul, is a remarkable one.
He first appeals to reason ". 49, and
desires to know what, If any. fault
he has committed. He next challenges
the motives which impelled Saul Was
1T God who sent him on this journey
or was it the evil counsel of men
w. 49,? If this latter then let God
deal with them according to their
just deserts And, finally, David uses
the two SMILES of a flea and :, par
fridge as evidence of his humility. his
inoffensiveness, his harmlessness
(Luke laid.
Every sinner who fights against God
and against his anointed ones plays
the fool and will sooner or later. like
Saul, awaken to the fact that he has
erred exceedingly"
David did not undertake his own de-
Iivoranco and Lord b;r,