New Britain herald., 1915-10-27

~decisive factor in the Balkans, now toriety given him through actions of Attorney Clark, who the witness said, l exceeded his authority. He said he was not ordered to pay his wife a nickle.
 Turning to the question of quar- | rels between the doctor and his wife. Dr. Greenberg said his wife's dispo- sition changed after they had been married year and a half and she would become angry on the slightest proVocat1on. Witness denied he ever played cards at the Hotel Regal. He couldn't recall that he ever visit ed the barroom nights.
 He couldn't recall the names of the extravagant women with whom his wife associated and whose luxury she coveted. He knew he couldn't af- ford such things and trouble result ed. Again the witness denied ever assaulting his wife although admitting hearing testimony by witnesses to that effect. Attorney Clark asked the witness whether it was agreed by him in paper drawn up by Attorney Hungerford that Mrs. Greenberg should have her divorce and the custody of the child provided she never sought alimony. This he de- nied and also that he had been at the house of Rabbi Horwitz the night before the trial opened with his par ents with the idea of reaching some such agreement.
 Dr. Greenberg was asked if he ever controlled his own temper and re- piled that he tried. Attorney Clark then asked him if he had not lost his temper during an altercation in | the corridor during recess when a fight between the litigants was l threatened. This he denied
 Decision Is Reserved.
 The case was concluded at o'clock and Judge Futile reserved decision. Attorney Clarke asked for a reason able amount of alimony for the sup port of Mrs. Greenberg and the baby. Attorney Hungerford opposed this motion, saying that Mrs. Greenberg had condoned any offenses of her hus- band since the dates of the alleged cruelty, ths destroying whatever grounds she had for alimony.
 At the afternoon session of court yesterday, the trial begun in the l morning, was resumed before Judge Futile. The plaintiffs side of the case was finished shortly after o'clock and the defense introduced few minor witnesses. Most of the evidence produced by the plaintiffs witnesses after Mrs. Greenberg left the witness chair was of a cumulative nature and went to substantiate her claims of cruelty on the part of the husband.
 John J. McGrath, former clerk at the Hotel Regal, New Britain, and now employed at the Grand, New Britain, was first called by Attorney Clark. McGrath had been subpoenaed the night before by plaintiff. but At torney Clark learned that he had been talking to Dr. Grenberg during the noon recess and immediately assailed him on the point. McGrath claimed that he had not talked to any extent | about the case. He said Dr. Green berg simply asked him who had brought him into the case and ex- pressed surprise to see him.
 Who is Blanche Evans? | McGrath testified to being clerk at the Hotel Regal two years ago. He said he met Dr. Greenberg there. The doctor lunched there three days a week.
 Asked whether he knew demon strator named Blanche Evans, Me- Grath replied in the negative. He said he never saw Greenberg in the company of any demonstrator. Cross examined by Judge Hunger ford, McGrath denied that the Hotel Regal was a place for gambling or assignation.
 Saw Doctor in Bridgeport Hotel.
 Dorothy Richmond Guernsey sister of the plaintiff, was called. She said s1e was her sisters confidante. She said her sister often showed marks on her body. Mrs. Guernsey testified to seeing pr. G1 eenberg in the company of another woman while dining at the