Arizona republican., 1915-09-28

Tn measure with his relation to the prohibition campaign, to the fund of which he was a contributor, and out of that fund NIr Rinehart was paid a salary. Dr. Hughes stated that Mir Wolpe had said to him that he was on Rineharts track and had evidence to prove that he had served time in the penitentiary in Iowa and was going to make it public when he got his con- vict number.
 Did he say for what crime?" ques- toned Robert s. Fisher, one of the attorneys for the plaintiff.
 Crime of rape" responded the wit ness.
 the defendants attorney, then ques- toned pr. Hughes.
 Isn't it a matter of fact that since this suit commenced you have said that the unsigned letter handed you by Mir. Wolpe might have been Rine- hart or someone else?"
 T couldn't have been mistaken, be- cause I went directly to Rinehart," :" said pr. Hughes. who declared he had been worried and exercised over the incident because of his relations with Mir. Rinehart in the prohibition cam paign.
 And from there where did you go?r continued the cross examiner.
 "TO John Dunbar's office. in the same building"
 Now, isn't it a fact. Dr. Hughes, that Mir. Dunbar's office was in the Noll building2
 This question was presumab bly in tended to show an impairment of the witness's memory since MT. Rinehart's office was in the Goodrich building
 Mir. Bullard's further questioning brought out the fact that Dr. Hughes had no recollection of any event of the July day when MT. Wolpe is alleged to have made his damaging remark other than reading the letter given him by the defendant. and visiting the of flee of the plaintiff
 MT. Wolpe on the witness stand de- nied making the statement the plain tiff alleged in his complaint. Mir Wolpe repeated what he declared in his deposition. that he had not circu- lated such a report in regard to MT Rinehart and had not discussed the re- port. He told of having been given an unsigned letter by Miss Garrison, reporter of an evening newspaper, and had shown it to pr. Hughes, he would have shown it to any acquaint ance who happened by, and that his interest in the paper was purely po- Iitical since it referred to c. J. Hall. secretary to Eugene F. Chain. who al that time was running against Mark Smith for the United States senate. Mir. Wolpe did not have any viewpoint of the matter beyond it's political sig nificance, he stated. This ended the testimony relating to allegations of the 
 w. C. Foster of the Phoenix Savings Bank and Trust Co. Lloyd Christy of the Central Bank, H. J. McClung of the Phoenix National Bank. Rudolph Kuchler of the Farmers Association, J. J. Sweeney of the National Bank of and Dwight B. Heard. testi- fled as to the character of the defend ant for truth and veracity.
 The selection of the jury occupied two hours, considerable part of which was consumed by counsel for the plaintiff and defendant. Mir. Fisher to MT. Bullard's frequent in terrupted. I'll interrupt when I please said. You're no tin god"
 MT. Bullard had occasion frequently to call the opposing cOunsels queries and undignified.'
 MT. Rinehart is being represented by MT. Fisher and MT. George Stone man and MT. Wolpe by MT. .Bullard IT, ID Afnr rlr