The Seattle star. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1899-1947, 1915-06-26

Little nr Bark jumped at the
chance TO try 20 injure other Den
lists by casting slur- and reflections
at them and their offices lie tells
us that there IL no combine. II this
be true. why Is Il that he was two
or three years getting his state Ger
tIfirater He II So conccltrd that h.
thought he could do his little cheap
advertising trick without getting
caught. II requires Real Gail for an
alleged Dentist 20 practice what he
calls Dentistry. without certificate.
IN violation Of what he calls Law.
for three years and hire unregi--
tered Dentists as assistants for
three years, and then. after obtain
Ing hts certificste.. set np the foolish
cry about qualifications. and warn
sng people about other Dentists VITO
happen 20 be In the same position
that he and hts men were In before
they received their certificates
Young Dr. Bark flatters himself
when he thinks that ! am Jealous
81 his achievements, because. az a
matter OF fact. this is considered a
huge Joke BY all Dentists In Seattle.
One Of the mistakes I acknowledge
having made Is that ] diEnifiei him
BY giving him recognition. but TIL.
IL not the first time that h. has In
dniged In fake advertising by cast
Ina siurs at my offices and also at
pentists Of IN. highest qualification
and standing who are victims Of the
Combines Dental LAW and iawi-ss
administration Of the same.
~ ! said before. there IL a type
n person who cannot b. reached by
law. reason or truth. and they are 90
full of concett that there Is no room
for shame In them.
~ THERE 4 DENTAL COMHINEs
Al the fall 1903 Dental Examina-
ticn Mt Tacoma the State Dental
led Iaf
who applied for examination wha,
the board called a code OF ethics.
which was intended TO be enforced
by . contract which real. IN part. as
follows: Now. therefore. " Is here.
with agreed by and between said
party OF the first part that In con-
stderation Of his COR herr being per-
mitted 10 take said examination. he
or shel will. IL a license IL Issued
TO him cor herl by the party OF the
Deesai oessdp, as a condition prece-
dent. practice Dentistry with fun
regard for the code Of ethics which
has been adopted By the National
Dental Association. and will. further
more. practice said profession In
full accord and under all the rules
and regulations or code Of ethics
that may be adopted by the wash
fnRton Stat. Dental Association or
BY the party OF tho second part"
7, Is true that the Dental Combine
pretended to repudiste this contract
after they saw that IL could not be
enforced openly. but for years they
enforced II secretly. and would do so
again II u were not for fear of ex-
<Sosure and public condemnation. I
frfuk that this was without quer-
tion the greatest insult and abuse
that body Of educated. professional
men could subject a person &c. IL
this does not snow a Dental Com
bine. I am at a loss to know what
would. The State Dental Society and
Dental Board were parties to the
contract. and the contract itself
shows a conspiracy against Dentists
wishing 10 locate here
The reason I am publishing the
foregoing facts IL because want
this iawles= gang and their stool
pigeons 10 stay away from myDffices
and let my assistants alone.
NEXT week ! shall write on the
Dental Law Of this state
EDWIN J. BROWN. u. II. :.