Burlington weekly free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1866-1928, 1915-09-16
NOT MUCH BUSINESS IN SIGHT
Chittenden County Court Be.
gins September Term.
Unusually Large Number of Cases
Continued, Some Set to Court Cal-
endar and Only n Few Ready
for Trial.

Apparently but little work will be don,
1t the September term of the Chittender
county court which convened Tuesla
morning at ten o'clock with the Hon
Willard w. Miles of Barton as prcsidnt
Judge, the Hon. Fred w Hall OF Esse,
and the Hon ilcnry w. Tracy of Shell
burne sitting as assistant judges Prof
Evan Thomas Of the University of Yer
mont opened tho courts session Will
prayer, after which the docket was read
This occupied the entire morning Al
unusually large number Of cases wer.
continued. and but very few were fount
10 be ready for trial. Several motions
were argued before Judge Miles at tn,
afternoon session, on which decision was
reserved, after which Judge Miles ex.
Vlaincd some of the new court procedure
CASES FOR JURY TRIAL.
The jury cases which are set for trial
are as follows:
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 10
Hotel Vermont Co VS.. David Cosgriff
apt. Town of South Burlington vs..
FRIDAY. SEPTEMBER II.
H. Il. Pashhy VS.. the Western Assur-
ance Co.: Porter Screen Mfg. Co. VS.
Central Vermont Il. X. CO.: Free Press
association VS.. l. T. Johnson; G. y
Baldwin VS.. George Palmer, apt.
SATURDAY. SEPTEMBER 49,
G. b. Arnold VS.. L. X. Somers, ct al.
Il, p,rIr,
W. Smith ct al, vs.. ]. e. hunt; John
Eient VS. the Snare & Trieste Co.
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 90
Fowler Bottlng Works VS. Max L.
Powell; =. r. Feinberg VS.. II. ]. Cassard
& TT; Emanuel G. Duprat ct al. VS.
Frank Chcsmore.
TUESDAY. SEPTEMBER 81
Arthur +. Culver VS.. Rutland Railroad
Co; Henry J. Mullen. apt, w. Mrs. a.
3. Mcmahon.
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER %.
f. w, Henry ct al, VS.. Fred p. 'rilison
n. w. Van Cleve VS. Eastern Fruit &
Nut Orchard Co: Mary Laf1ame VS.
John Higgins ct al; Ellen Phillips VS.
George w. Streeter
s. II. Miller VS.. Henry Todd apt; In re
will of Adeodat Normand, Zotique Gravel
Spec Admir-. Prop. VS.. Napoleon Nor
mand, continued; Anna Madigan VS.. Johr
Finneran Il Tr., Apt: Henry Labarge
apt. vs.. Michael Leddy
FRIDAY. SEPTEMBER "a.
f. A. strout Farm Agency vs.. JOS W
and Elizabeth Curtis; John Forville VS.
Archibald Casey; Mary E. Weith, apt
VS.. 1.atoof Bessery: John Forville VS.
John Casey: II. S. Howard. Spec Admir-
VS.. American Wooden Co.
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 9TH
LYMAN Zelig Feinberg vs. Fred l..
Smith. John Casey VS. John Forville.
SET TO COURT CALENDAR.
The following cases are set for trial
on the court calendar Merrill McCar-
gar, Jr., ct al. VS.. Peter I.avery, Mer-
rill McCargar and William Thyme, ct
al Trs. Hill Storage e. Implement CO.,
VS.. Rutland Garage Co, c. b. Wetherby
and v a. Billiard VS.. H. b. Wiley. apt,
II. j. Cassard VS. T. II. Murphy, w. A.
Eddy VS.. r. J. Pound. apt. A. F. War
rem. ct al, VS.. r II. Murphy, Martha
l.. Sullivan VS.. John ]. Flynn ct al.
John Mitchell ct al, VS.. a. Demarco,
apt. Jos. Wichnrowski VS.. Abe C. Ros-
enberg, VIM. +. Aiken vs.. w. A. Pol
lard apt. Frank y. Latour W.. DR..
Geo. r. Latour, The Old Bee Hive vs.
Geo. NJ. Delaney. A. a. A. SpOoling &
Winding CO.. vs.. o. l.. Kinds CO., apt.
In re will of Samantha Northrop, -. NJ
johnson, spec. admir-. prop. VS.. ]. o.
Simpson, cont. J. w. Page VS.. Ralph
DEMO. apt, Max l.. Powell ct al, VS.
JAS A. Merrill & tr, apt, Max l.
Powell ct al. VS.. Jas. A. Merrill. apt
John Bircher VS.. Barrett Mfg Co, Jed
G. White VS.. Frank l.. Hanley. apt
Frank w Woods ct al, VS.. Frank Nc
Carthy, apt, Leon Gigucre VS.. Eugene
Martel, Martin s. Villas. apt. VS.. Henry
Fenwick ct al, Martin S. Villas VS.. Var
tan John, apt.
OTHER CASES DISPOSED OF.
Judgments were entered in the cases
Of William T. Whalen VS.. Frank G
Saunders ct al, and of Guy W. Bailey
VS.. Frank G. Saunders ct al. The fol
lowing cases were either settled and
discontinued or discontinued for othcl
reasons: j. +. Hunt vs.. Samuel Gross
Atwood, admir-. vs.. The Mutual Lif,
Ins Co., of y, Y, Hyman Cohen, apt,
VS. Chas. Martin ct al. Brunswick Balk,
Collender Co, vs. Zelig Feinberg, Johr
Martin VS.. Dophis Martin ct al, Theo
Hopkins, admir-. VS.. Frank w. Elliott
Oliver II. Sherman VS.. Fred A. Cush
man, Strong Hardware Co.. VS.. i. b
Calkns, apt Frances w. Brown VS.
Fayette b. Caikns, Fayette Is. Calkins
VS.. Frances W. Brown, VT Construction
CO., vs.. Geo, w. Kimball ct al, lIamp
den Shoe Co, VS. Albert g. Rosenberg
apis, and the divorce case of Francis
IIaRock VS., Gertrude sweeney LaRock.
The other cases on the other jury and
court dockets were either passed or con.
tinued until next term, although some
Of them may be heard Mt this term by
agreement Of the opposing parties