New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1915-03-03

#s SUMMONS.
STATE OF MINNESOTA,
County of Brown.
3 District Court, Ninth Judicial District.
Ferdinand Schaefer, Plaintiff,
Johann Nau, John Stockum, Jo-
hanna Kutz, Rosa Stoll, Anton
Schrock. Crescentia Klinkham-
mer, Gustav Leue, Heinrich
Schammann, Charlotte Auguste
Richter, Albert Schwarzmann,}
Franz Stuchlick, and also all
other persons or parties un-
known, claiming any right, title.
estate, lien or interest in the real
estate described in the complaint
herein,. $50. -. Defendants.
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, To the above
named Defendants:
You and each of you are hereby summoned
and required to answer the complaint of the
Plaintiff in the above entitled action, which is
filed in the Office of the Clerk of the District
Court of the Ninth Judicial District in and for
the County of Brown and State of Minnesota,
and to serve copy of your answer to the said
complaint on the subscriber, at his office in the
City Of New Ulm in said County, within twenty
days after the service of this summons upon you
exclusive of the day of such service; and if you
fail to answer the said complaint within the time
aforesaid, the Plaintiff in this action will apply
to the Court for the relief demanded in the COM
plant.
Dated February 26th 1915
JOS. A. ECKSTEIN
Plaintiffs Attorney,
New Ulm. MINI.
NOTICE OF LIS PENDENs.
STATE OF MINNESOTA,
County of Brown
District Court, Ninth Judicial District
Ferdinand Schaefer, Plaintiff
Johann Nau, John Stockun, Jo-
hanna Kutz, Rosa Stol Anton
Schrock, Crescentia Klinkham-
mer, Gustav Leue, Heinrich
Schlammann, Charlotte Auguste
Richter, Albert Schwarzmann,(
Franz Stuchlick, and also all
all other persons parties I'M
known, claiming any right, title,
estate, lien or interest in the real
estate described in the complaint
herein. ........ Defendants
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, That an
action has been commenced in this Court by the
above named Plaintiff against the above named
Defendants for the purpose of determining any
adverse claim, estate, lien interest in and to
ata aft in ho naint
herein described, claimed by said defendants or
either of them, and to have the same adjudged
void; also to have said defendants and all persons
or parties claiming under through them for
ever barred from claiming and from any
and all claims, right, title estate, lien or in
terest in and to said real estate or any part there
of adverse to the plaintiff herein; and to have
said plaintiff adjudged to be the owner in fee
simple and entitled to the possession of said
premises and real estate and to have the title
thereto forever queted in the plaintiff, his heirs
and assigns.
The premises affected by said action are situated
in the County of Brown, and State of Minnesota,
and are described as follows: Lot No. Ten Q0
of Block No. Seventy-five (75, Lot No. Eight
(0 Of Block No. Seventy-six (76). Lots Nos.
Four "a. Seven %, Nine (9), Ten OO), and
Eleven QD, all of Block No. Eighty-seven $50,
| Lots Nos. One (1> and Fourteen Q4) of Block No.
| One Hundred Fourteen Q14), and Lot No. Three
| 60 of Block No. One Hundred Thirty-fve Q35),
all South of Center Street in the City of New Uln,
Brown County Minnesota, according to the plat of
said City file in the office of the Register of
Deeds in and for said County.
| Dated February 26th, 1915.
| JOS. A. ECKSTEIN
Plaintiffs Attorney,