New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1915-11-12

Continued from pax.
"Yo1'd be chased back % Lockport
20 fast We wouldn't be able 70 see
more Of you than your coattails. The
only delays In subway work are those
caused by obstacles which 1t IS not
easy to surmount. III tell you that
there has been no unreasonable delay.
There isn't In the civilized world a
work of that magnitude that has gone
on with the perfectness of the work
which can be found in the construction
of the subway to-day. What gives you
the idea that work has been delayed p
81 have received lots of letters stat
| ing that" replied Senator Thompson.
"Well, I'd like to know what you
know about subways," Mr.. Mccall de-
manded.
you have large force Of well paid
engineers in the commission who can
keep the work going so no delays will
result" said the Senator.
Say" Mccall exclaimed, "any time
you want to meet me on public plat
form and discuss the number OF en-
glad to meet you"
Never Belmont's Attorney.
"Oh, I'll say what | have to say in
! the Senate next winter"
"And if you do III have something TO
say to you outside the Senate!"
| (As usual, explanations Of these
warm remarks, made before all the
spectators, were privately offered at
the end of the examination. They all
/ do it,
/ Mccall was questioned about his
other reported activities outside Of the
Public Service Commission. and, after
he had given colorless testimony on
this line, he said:
81 have been represented in a morn
/ ing newspaper as attorney for August
Belmont. | want to say | have never
spoken more than twenty-five words
with Mr.. Belmont. have never had any
relations with him, good, bad or indif-
ferent, either in q business or q social
way. | never acted as his attorney in
the case that newspaper refers 10, or
in any case, and | have never had a
cent Of money from him. I say this
without any intimation Of disparage-
ment TO Mr.. Belmont, who is a gentle
man."
Commissioner William Hayward, who
succeeded Milo R. Maltbie on the Pub
/ lie Service board. took the stand. He
became a commissioner on April last
Mr. Lewis asked him about the pro-
ceedinC5 brought against the Edison
Electric Illuminating Company. OF
Brooklyn BY Albert Moritz in a rate
case. The matter had originally been
handled BY Mr Naltbie. and Commits
sioner Hayward fell heir 70 il when he
took Aaltbies place.
Williams on Stand
The Edison Company, through is
attorney. Commissioner Hayward said.
cskei that Il De Permitted 20 introduce
Sc G witness j. ire hearings James Z.
Al..so-, r s. Ic-.s. a. electrical ex-
re-- sd s. E----TltT O. electric service
.stes EzT~s-- sad tbs: ss c5i@cts.
- -t--.-t-c A.-s-- - .ss:tT. t-;
"a; .1s &C., :---ss.:-s-s cTs---,s1
49,
% --,:ss-s: -: - Cc--- =, A.
-ft.s -. -st.r gre .tcs.,- -
% -fsf.F So -trEI-.
ft- 20 ---r.;ss % -fs ,---i-T =
f~~Er f~ .gsf-s 90 -:- a. =
as t- aGtas ltt EsIss - Isss,: Ss--
ttt- .sVst7.
vgrs ST. ~. -, - :z--cs.
VS. tuasufIsllr 20 &c IT.. sVtv
.~tr %, -ff ~ " - itt been
vt-t fc
90 va 1rs N,ff-s "a p
eruu ssrSr ~ t'srTNf- tsI A. ~
-rras rfr' ~ ls soss ufrr .is IT
uIesh - ris SAD rec nt--f- vas
sstlnA tft D, rhn n ~g ns-s rv9s':
nr frvf goes ors s. eifr st-ns ~.
0f r's- INN w. 1rs-s r9-s't
'.er fs. M rbf, ,fir4f ara % npsi-
rs rts tv1 - -Hs lfv- lf ~ ~
1t BE- mr. '1tr tvnsn .s>,lls -
tut eyUt-t'ni ~ ne siti "
te.'~et 80 ne trt lt, ~ - i.e 80,
e1 20 f0f S ITO tt ff. rVis st,sr
b.t'
.,,-es't u'f t}ti r,.r tr-.' 's,s
- fsf eSrfr. ~ W Artlu.tf hss--
rs tr. W M B. .rsu. -
fff N,.'s tfI sAs y-ts-ass D.
tlf % vrtt - .~.ft.sI 500 rpsg ? g.
f'1tsq ',,4 80, ttf htas.pl~ - ~
s*Eft stHu rtff. git y lsess IS ,
tif .frp - ffsF> we've sr~se9s s.
- ~ Nttt VI ~ ,fs So yy>.,l
sifxF( ~ ~ ~ sftsts w Wool 20
" ,ter,. 81 tpt ~ NsNnt,t -
,t7 p stsste y t"< We uss sy,
40 ftt. ~t, res s>'e - seesN s,exr.y
F' sftt fsssse ~ q. 5ne eesvt-s -
'e's 81 tttG Wen sAe s~p,,,, ssss-
,esst ,s weren't set E1,,cr Cer,rSay g.
YssVhsse gAe ~ remaining SHARES -
ere A",.efdsa E,ss.sis NSAs ssi
Ncweg Cc'@rsey We wss ss<cl WY ne
bad voted fer shs application IN she
fatc ~ lhe rrvtcss ~ ;he el,v TIA,
such 4 r,cye would prejudice che es;y's
effort - have she Amstcrdams fran
eh,se declared void
Il did ret know - tina. action" he
rcrlicd
And YOU did no, hear OF or see the
letter from William F. Sheehan TO
| Commissioner Cram demanding some
move by the commission on the appli-
cationf"
Not that can recall. The reason
I voted for the application was that
Commissioner Maltbie assured ne the
city's interests would be safeguarded
bv the terms under which we permitted
the purchase Of stock"
Milo r. Maltbie will be a witness
to-day.
Forum to Discuss Women's Wages.