The Bridgeport evening farmer., 1915-03-12
TIT oNG or WOMEN UEABL.E TO GET
 INTO ANGLE TRIAL.
contanuea from Page one

length.
 The possibility tha4 the defence would De begun today served to bring out the largest crowd of spectators since the inception of the trial.
 The number Of women present ehowed another increase. They were of all ages. In the front row of the spectators section. sat two wo- men whose hair was silver grey. They see1ned to take the deepest interest in the case and continually crzned thear necks to catch a glimpse of Mrs. ApEls's face
 In back of those two aged attend ants sitting on a window siIls was a group Of girls in their teens. It ap- peared to be their first glimpse of a criminal court at work and they watched the proceedings with pop eyed interest.
 Mrs Angle seemed wear5ed as ane entered court on fhs arm of her fAth- CT During Chief Breanan's s story, yesterday, Mrs. Angle Wept silently. Today. she seemed to have regained her custoenary comp poss1re- She sat forward in her chair and held her fathers hand as she listened to the testimony
 Before the jury was brought in Stake's Attorney Cummings snbnait- ted his amendment to the infofnn nna- ti6n in the complaint.
 e said the changes were tsto make the information more conplete.' The changes would insert the word .pEsh1ng in the chaTge against Mrs. Ang1es would change the word s'fand- ingss to s'dagging,,' and would charge that Mrs. Angle struck the deceased with Instruments unknown to the states attorney-'
 He cited legal precedents for the admission of the amendments.
 fudge Downs objected to the ad- mission of the amendments that would change the stlbstance o9 the complaint. He said it's admission at t1ia time would be a denial of jus tdcev to the defendant
 Tt comes too Iate.s ha said. We have cried this case once, so far as She state,s evidence is concerned.
 we have conducted our case up to this time on the information Of the complaint This information was ta4 the defendant did strike with her hands and dsts Now, after all these exhibits arc i1ls the state would leave zt to the jury to speculate whether any c6 these instruments were used :
 Judge Downs said that the states chief expert witness was now beyond 1He Jurisdiction of the court. The ad- mission or the amendments he safds would De an tirlJusttce to Che accused ' The amendment to the allegation was
 nonatrous' So far as its introdue- ton at this time, he said
 Attorney K1eins for the defense, also ob5ected He attacked the stslte' 5 claim that there were precedents for s1h proeedures holding that the cases cited and the present case were dis similar.
 IT the state had charged her with striking with these lnstru ments, intro duced in evidence, we would have ex- aIfained these fnstrursentss said Mr. klein. ssBut it was claimed that she did strike with her hands and dsts.'
 This case has been tried well by ths etate. Now. at the eleventh hour, comes this amendment. It isn't fair to have this case go to the jury with this anendment This isn't gues sing contest The evidence much be cer-
 It d does seem now that after trying this case for two weeks, the state should be instructed to go on.''
 Mr. Cummings said the defense