Sequachee Valley news. (Sequachee [Sequatchie], Tenn.) 1896-1952, 1915-01-14
ELDER G. W. WHITE
VS.. VIM. L0ACH

Editor News:
Please permit me TO contrast q. w.
White and VIM. LOaeh as they need TO
be Contrasted, to-wit:
When Bro. G.. W. White put in
to this discussion, be took sides with
the one who was advocating the truth
of Gods Word, which showed he, too,
was of the truth. q When LOach put
in be took sides with one who was de,
nying the truth of Gods Word, ana
who was plainly incorporating me,
her opponent, and telling untruths on
me, which plainly showed that he hau
never received the love of the truth,
in order that he might be saved, ~
Thess 2, 10) and that on that account
God was sending him STRONG DEUS
ion in order that ne might believe a
lie-his own skeptical opinion in or,
del that he might be damned. ("
Thess., 2:11, H..
When | called on Elder II. w.
White to say whether l said what
Belle falsely imputed to me, he was
so full of Gods Truth, Gods Spirit
Gods Grace and Religion, as to
promptly and plainly clear me OF her
false charges, which plainly showed
that Bro. White was an honest man,
and honestly on the side of truth, and
that he loved the truth better than he
did any liar of earth. .. When l call
ed on Loach to answer me and say
whether Belle told the truth on me,
and if not the truth, what did she
tell, he was so destitute OF GOD
Truth, and had so little regard for any
other sort of truth, as that he did not
even try to answer either one of my
questions, but ignored them, as II ne
was under no sort of obligation to tell
the truth, thereby impressing me that
be loved lies and liars, and hated the
truth and truthful people. 3. When
Bro White had truthfuly answered
my questions, he backed up his an
swers with Scriptural Truth, showing
it was christian to hate lies and every
false or lying way, and that those
who hated false ways got their under
standing through God's rrecepts or
commandments, thereby showing that
God commands us to hate all false or
lying ways, which plainly proves Bro
White to be a man of God, indeed and
in truth.
3. When Loach dodgingly tried
to answer my questions, he called on
''the readers of the News to analyze
all these (my cited Scriptures and
they will show different meaning in
using the word liar In the way he ~
used it," to which l reply thus: l..
If they do show a different meaning as
Loach SO falsely says, then it neces-
sarily, logically and Scripturslly fol-
lows that they will have to show that
the Scriptures themselves lied on those
whom they accused Of lying. and that
their accused liars told only the truth,
for l am sule did not lie on Belle,
and am equally sure she did not tell
the truth on me. Awful words are
these of Loach's' @. Loach we'll
knew that not one-half Of the readers
of the News were scholars enough to
analyze any text Of Scripture, or to
know an analysis If they saw it, and
If he was half the Sunday School
teacher his good brother, Chubbuck,
says, why did he not analyze them.
and thus try to show what he said.
Only because he knew he could not do
80, If it was to save him from hell.
8. used them to show that God and
all His people are against lies, and
down upon all liars. and have more
than once told them 80, as did |, and
Loach's analysis would have to show
the contrary, if he set aside my doc.
trine rs he so falsely claims 1t would
have to show that God and His peo-
pie love lies, and fellowship liars, II
| it shows what Loach said. Loach,
demand of you to come on with your
Analysing. Yes, defy you to do so,
and if you make a false analysis,
will handle you without gloves for it.
Stop your great swelling words OF van
ity and come right down to your owr
advice to others, 80 | can get to ex
pose your analyses as they deserve
4. AS it is impossible for God tt
| lie, and as He has 3S9 times exposed
people for lying am sure 1t is i'm
possible for Him to prove by analyz
ing His scriptures against lying, thai
I am wrong in telling them of theil
lies, too, like God has done. God says
I did right.
4. Bro. White gets his understand
ing through Gods precepts, which ii
right, and therefore he cannot see
how Interpretations of Gods scriptures
and perversions of His Word, and fals'
arguments can be uplifting or com
forting to a child Of God, because
they all are of the devil. Q. Loaci
gets his understanding from his opin
ions, of which the original inspired
Hebrew Of Kings, 1871 says, "skep
teal opinions, or skepticisms, and O.
which Eccl. 1924 says: ''For man!
are deceived by their own vain opin
ions; and an evil suspicion hath over
thrown their judgement, therefor'