Bisbee daily review. [volume] (Bisbee, Ariz.) 1901-1971, 1915-11-06
TANGLED PROPERTY
CASE IN SUPERIOR
COURT FROM BISBEE
Brewery GulCh Property in Cues
ton in the Superior Court; In
tereStin' Testimony Is Entered
in the Suit.

] WIS uAAulAEA NlAhN IN AAlN u lul "
the case Of Rose Miller and Harry
Miller VS. A. Granas, Jennie Granas,
NJ. Danzier, w. r. Womack, Lena l..
Brown and Dora Tysen
The case involves the question Of
title to property in Brewery Gulch i'm
Bisbee and has rather peculiar cir
/ cumstances attached to it, Harry
Miller, one of the plaintiffs in the
case was arrested by the United
States autorities on charge of white
slavery and was being held in iall in
Los Angeles i'm default OF $4,000 bail.
The defendants in the case, accordins
to the complain, went on the bona
the plaintiff executed TO them a trust
deed in the place of a mortgage to
secure them from going on the bond,
the deed covering the property in
Bisbee
Miller defaulted IN the bond and the
defendants were con PEELED to pay the
$4,000 They SHORTY afterwards sold
the property to w. y Womack for sew
eral thousand dollars, but refused to
pay to Mrs. Milier the money received
/ in excess Of the $4,000 and the inter
est. A payment of $1,000 was made
to the defendants by Mrs. Miller and
they claim that the money was for
going on the bond and was not for a
payment on the $4,000 The case
/ promises to develop a number of in
teresting questions before it is dis.
posed off,
The plaintiff seeks to recover the
property as well as the issues and
profits derived from the same since
Mrch 10 1912 W. 4. Womack has
been in possession of the property
since that time and has received the
rent He claims that he was an limo
cent purchaser and that he knew no.
thing Of the deed of trust at the time
he purchased it and that he paid the
$4,000 in good faith
w. G.. Gilmore appears for the plain
tih in the case and j. T. Kinsbury and
VI. Stanley, Of Los Angeles, for the de
PENDANTS
When the case was called this morn
ing. Attorney W. G. Gilmore for the
plaintiff, asked the court to have the
/ defense elect their ground Of defense
"S 'ng'i p'eu1'ii5S W.Ie Co"li'c'i'iE'
anu 'i'o u'lei'se ''il'''1leu 1la' OHey
".l'i''5 ~ 80 ~ ''i"' -" 'Ng
'7su .1'N- u "S' uoeO do "u'l'''-7N
'" 'l'''' 1.-'e'''eu aus
A'-oi7 inc "''Ngs7eS Ia 'No 0"s
liol. are '"uS 7"I' W. u
o''"-ii''' W.. loO9 ""u y" IL " oIil"I On
O'''s' ''ooosu'"gs'
-" ol1g' was .l'''ou D." 'Ne o"2y
~ ~ o. vi e.'', "''i' w. 'Npo"'
->a'loN". "1alu ana r. N"ISosln' re-
aP0o''' 1''' Se''il7 NOV ei-DeI ~ d"
''e u'.1 vi Ne'. '-'- 'Ne N'o'''ll'' He--
laae7 '''' o''e 'e"Se9 10 property ]"
Dou7la7'
III 'ir o.Se Oh ADJ '''a'I 'e'aap e'
al VS. D'''u O"ll7ilei' an oIueI was
, entered Se1lln8 lhe case LOT tilal Oh
->o'e''DC' No. q similar olueI "as
entered I'D lne case Oh ! ne STANDARD
VI pony "7''''9' 'no sam,
= oeie'.ualll' III 'ne case ol Douslas 9
Z opaINs i'eailS com p"Hy VS. AuIoIl'
3D. 'Pa'Ns' No'eI,'Der ~ was SET az
ID '"e ua'e LOT neallnE 'he nlo''o"S'
n in9 0"7e vi '"'''e9 H. I'SCoe e' "
a vs. 'lahO! Mli''i's ana 9ineiIils 20
was oiuel ga ulSi'liSSou "I'noul pre-
Juulce on I''olloN Oh tine plaln'lH "n'
b "O 1ne pia'n'iu COSTS.
81 III tne case ol nose steiner 'S' Nou
Trey steiner an oIueI was eH'eIe'
p'e''n''N7 'iie ueie'lu"liO IL ON lailn
o 'Ie lilllloI emu llo'i 'He gun 'su4C'lO'
Oh Ine court anu was Hollleu 10 ma +,
- 'ne cnllu VA court on SATURDAY l'tu
at "llon uile lne arguments On IN
Us mutton VIII Oe neaIu.
IF Ia inc case Oh Ll'iian DaIIlsoh VS.
IA" az" "'i i'9oH' loT uiFoIee' cons
ueI"D'e 'e71lii'olly was ln1Iouuceu am
d. '"e case oI'e'eu 'ohll''ueu TOT Iur'ne
y les'lIlony'
!" ."e o"7e Oh Maoel Ne""S
9e"ool DlS'llcI NO 20 lot preach
" oon'IaoU ,ne ug''i.'l''' was auS''ii'e
% ana '"e plaln'iH gwen lea'1 10 amen
, 'he Complaint
Judgment WAS tuLtLtu ll NlE Gas