The Barre daily times. (Barre, Vt.) 1897-1959, 1915-06-07
ORANGE COUNTY COURT.
Louis Mazzolini Won Damages of $3.50
From Randolph Chief of Police.

The June term of Orange county cour
convened Tuesday, June l, with the fol
lowing court officers present: Leighton
II. Slack of St. Johnsbury, presiding
Judge; Henry R. Hayward of TunbridgC
and Samuel B. Buell. of Strafford, presid
ing judges; William II. Sprague, deputy
clerk; Frank S. Williams of Bradford
states attorney; AFRO A. Reed of vii.
Jamestown, sheriff, and Miss Mildred
Brooks of Montpelier, reporter. Prayer
was offered by Rev. John A. Lawrence
followed by the opening proclamation by
exSheriff Benjamin II. Adams of Chel-
sea, who with Deputy Sheriff George A.
Tracy of Chelsea, are assisting Sheriff
Reed at this term.
The reading of the jury calendar show
ed that there were eighteen cases set
for trial, which will undoubtedly will
occupy the attention of the court for
the entire mouth of June, unless some
of the cases set for trial by jury should
be settled or continued. The civil cal
endar of cases set for trial by the court
numbers twelve and il is expected that
most of them will be tried.
Six of the thirty-four Jurors were
excused, leaving twenty-eight from which
TO draw the various panels. There was
no case ready for trial on Tuesday aft.
ernoon, but on Wednesday morning a
jury was drawn in the case OF Louis Ma.
zolini VS.. c. C. Clifford. The parties live
in Randolph, and the action was brought
10 recover damages for an alleged false
arrest and for damages. physical. men
tai and otherwise 20 have been the direct
result of the arrest and confinement fol-
lowing. The plaintiff conducted a fruit
store in the village OF Randolph and as
claimed by the defense. and admitted
by the plaintiff, kept his store open to
a more or less extent on Sundays dur.
ing times he vended his goods, and the
evidence tended TO show that the defend
ant. who was chief Of police in Randolph
under instructions from the village trus.
tees had forbidden his selling goods on
Sunday and as he paid no attention 10
the admonitions Of the chief, the latter
in his official capacity on Sunday morn
ing. July 5, 1914, gathered the plaintiff
in and took him TO the village lookup.
and this, without warrant for his ar
rest.
After several hours Of confinement in |
the lock-u the condition of which was.
agreeable TO the testimony. al the way |
from A. ]. slick and clean % something /
that would make the average pig stv $50 4
some" the fruit vendor was taken vio- 4
lently III and by the chief Of police and
tao physicians removed 70 bic own home. 4
where be remained for several months
during the process Of c0nsaioscence. Asl
q result Of the foregoing. accentusted
b. various and sundry alleged facts as
cvinced BY numerous pyrothechnie de
plays If evidence. here omitted for
want Of space, the plaintiff brought tire
suit, the prosecution Of which vas con-
Quoted bF r. A. Hoar ~ Barre. who vas
assisted ~ p Z. scott. ais9 al Barre
and K " Harvey of M0ufpsiier whiIsI
MARIA ~ Wilson IT Randolph and stan.
lev a. WHlson ~ Chsissa defended Caasf
GfHord The case oeeupief the aftertior
81 the caurt = little over tao dars end /,
uas given g. the iarr On FRIDAY nsurn-
iuR and lust iefors tht noan hour ther
rsFldsred thrgufh ti.efr foreman. Hoi.n q
Strong of Bradford verdict for thr
rlaintiF g. rHarfrr ~ fir defendants fhf
SUR ~ ksro nffuai danares and be- aHE
ben b. tt5s. tts sam cf $50 etffrf.isrr
fsHsrHs
Ths nent eaaf ready f1T trial uur nisr
J H.an8sifh rasF egmfrr frDm the sast
'aFs sng 10 nn srfiun fa frrud an
isast truurit ~ erfrrs arf fsrtrf5s
9si8u1rrt 81 Easf Hat1f1rk nFnirst ID
.t8 y Erariav nf Har#a'rh Tho r1nsr
Sc Sligo ftrt II 0rtdt.r IpIa thrt
s1ur,t RI Dr. Frariar the fffanaari
iFun1t ufH ~ Nnnas resi fetntf
.sHrH F Eran~e ferr IS Fast Ear
.1lFt Erf afaraf ens sfsfrraf err
-atsd 81 tis- and thsf tiass rs1.sE arso-
y entHHsrt tsat $50 fnr~ s1rssiafF
- hurtre6 nerss aHr ttss rarr = rs
'fer 80 rTts-s ffFr EHH fff sa~~
urpsgss ans spuas stzt a sarlalrss lsss