The Sunday telegram. [volume] (Clarksburg, W. Va.) 1914-1927, 1915-12-05
Two Good EIeyens.

ond. while Marshall gets one on. each
eleven.
Two Good EIeyens.
Hammiil and Loudin OF Davis and
Elkins get mention, as does Elder OF
Bethany, while Lawrence aud Gala
way. Of Marshall. deserve notice. an \
two OF three positions. notably ends
tackles and halfbacks. the substitu-
ton ofeanother man would make 1T
tie difference in the strength OF the
eleven, but all things considered 4
think the elevens are the best that
can be selected without shifting. j,
have seen Wesleyan play Washington
and Jefferson and West Virginia.
have watched West Virginia against
Washington and Lee. Marshall and
Wesleyan and have seen Davis and
Elkins play Marshall. In addition to
this i have secured data on all play
sers from players. coaches and news
paper men. n
Several Good Ends.
There are several very good ends IN
the state and only by consid erinK
both offense and defense can rfehts
selection be made. Hutchinson 81
West Virginia University Is az good
as any other In both departments.
hence gets first choice. Having
watched him In three big games u,
consider him the most intelligent end
that has played in West Virginia fins
seven years: Heavier, Of Wesieyatf,
except for rather lhasty temper
could be as valnab BILE lie not more :vsiu-
able than Hntc hinson, because Of $50
perior weight, speed and Kicking abiI-
ity. He was blamed for poor PUNT
ing at gFairmont. but he did wonder
fully well considering the way His
teammates. allowed Lambert and
Hutchinson to hurry his kicks. IL
Morrison. of Wesleyan, and Cole
bank West ginia could be COM
bined they would make a terror on
both defense and oftense. AS, II IS
Morrison, great on the offense lases
out because OF a poor defense while
with Colebank It is the opposite.
Hammil, of Davis and Elkinsi deserves
mention. \ ~ :; ,Ss
Kellison Best Tackle.
sss The tackles also present i've good i
men,, Kellison, Of Wesleyan Is the
best Of the lot. Withstand ding his
game against West Virginia, which
was not IN to his standard. For the
other Blair, of WESLEYAN; Webster.
OF West Virginia: and Taylor OF Mar
shall are very evenly matched With
Bailey, OF West Virginia, not far be- y
hind Taylor's game against Wash
fngton and Lee, Marietta and West
virginia was better, than Webster
showed against Washington and Lee
and better than Blair offered against
Washington and Jefferson and West
Virginia. Considering both defense
and {ofense Taylor is much better, as X
he Is Q; bear at receiving forward
passes. Taylor's tackling is "a disap
.pointm ent. but he messes up more !.
plays behind the line than all the
Others. Hence Taylor gets the sec
lond place. y. Z
Weak at Guards.
Neither of the guards am. select
ing treas strong as the rest 81. che
team and would be displaced bysWab-
sters and. Blair &c shifting positions
were the fair thing. AS 1t Is Bran
non, Of West Virginia looks best be
cause he PLAYED q good lighting game
against Wesleyan. Il Is about a toss
up Tor the other. guard between step-
herd of Marshall {; Vance, Wa gnar, Of (
Wesleyan; and Henri. Of West vir-
,ginia. Vance being, asbetter a ehter
than the others gets the place
For center there is but one man.
Lambert. He can make any team Ia
the country Stngl Teton was toufad i
as good but fails to make the Sec
ond team because he showed 90 poor
y. in the West rginia game. Sones Of