The Jeffersonian. [volume] (Atlanta, Ga.) 1907-1917, 1915-03-04
A Perfect Specimen of the De-
ceiefEllneSS of Roman
Catholic Editors.

SmGAaOAEC EasRSOPSs
/ INDER the official approval of Bishop
Canevln, the Pittsburgh Observer is pub
lished
It is fair sample of the American papist
paper.
1t IS the paper that SANDERS Hon. John
Lind and his wife, because after long So
Journ in Mexico, they had the courage to
publish the truth on the Mexican priesthood
l. is the paper that is rabidly denouncing
Harpers' Weekly, because this American
magazine has dared to print something which
the paplsts don't relish.
1t IS the paper qch5ch IS qzoatiog 0ver the
assassination Of William Black bv the fue
cooca9dly Knights Of Columbus, WHO
PROVED BY THEIR ACTIONS WHAT
SORT or SECRET OATH THEY TAKE!
The Pittsburgh Observer has department
named, "Questions Answered.
In this it resembles all the other American
papers OF the foreign pope; and, like all the
questions
The following is a perfect specimen of how
they do it.
The question put to the paper was this:
Query:-An anti-Catholic lecture was given
last Saturday in the Carnegie Music Hall, North
side, by a certain Anna Lowry. Do you know
who brought the woman to the city, and who she
is or pretends to be? Also do you not think that
some protest should be made? Or do you per-
haps maintain that these exhibitions harm
observation-disclosures
Pretending to answer this lot Of questions,
the O6S6TU6r says
Answer do not know who arranged for the
lecture referred to in the query, but as notices
of the coming and the presence of the woman in
question appeared in the keystone American
| presume that the Federation of American Pro-
tective Societies responsible
Anna Lowry is an anti-Cathoc lecturer and at
times claims to be an 'eX-nun;' according to the
court records she is purveyor of obscene talk
She delivered a lecture in Winona, Minnesota
last March and warrant was sworn out for her
arrest, but she fled before it could be served. In
May Of the same year she returned again to the
State Of Minnesota, when she was arrested and
put in the town jail of Wnona The court found
her guilty of using language unfit for public
address and she forbidden to any
public hall in Winona for the purpose of dis
seminating her malicious and immoral teaching
She appealed to the district court, and last No
vember the decision handed down fully
tanning the verdict Of the municipal court She
was held to be guilty of using obscene language
and sentenced to pay fine of the costs in the
case, and in default of that payment she to
be committed to the Winona Jail.
Anna Lowry therefore stands convicted by the
decision Of the court of being addicted to the use
of obscene taSh-language We might expect from
the low dives of a Babylon-and of having used
this language before a public audience at the
special invitation of anti-Cathoc men who
disgracing and befouling the name of Americans.
[ have quoted the answer at some length,
in order that you may get the full force of
this accusation against an American lady,
4 qchOse character IS at least as good as that Of
Bishop Cane0in.
The bishops paper accuses Anna Lowry of
using Language from the low dives of Baby
lon.'
That is exactly what she did and the Baby
lon, is the Roman Catholic church, and the