The Detroit times., 1914-10-13

Il
Burns told him would be carried out p
Il did not hear any such conversa'
ton"
you recall this statement being
made to Gilman By Burns:
will leave no doubt In the mind OF the
tunity presents itself TO take the
stapdr"
Il do not"
you heard Burns tell Gilman he
had TO chance to get away"
"Yes."
CONN said that Jasnowski did no,
ask Gilman II his statement was vol
untary until the alderman had an
swered all bis questions. The witness
said chat he was not positive thai
Gilman made statement to Jasnow
Iski that he made IN agreement with
Brennan for $3.50.
THAT amount was mentioned In Z
question that Gilman answered yes
to-" declared Conn.
do you remember that Gilman In
answer to Brennan's questions said
No. there was no price"
Yes, remember that"
do you recall Brennan saying that
Gilman was right when the alderman
had stated that he did not come w
to get &1.00o?"
Yes. i remember that"
| Didn't Brennan say the only thing
that Gilman talked about on July II
was q position on the Wabash"
THAT was spoken of. don't knou
that the word only was used"
! "Mr. Gilman told you that he came
lup on, July rs to talk further with
brennan about position?"
g"Yes.h
ibid Burns then ask Gilman what
else he came up for and Gilman re
piled. nothing else?'"
II don't recall that
Didn't Brennan and Burns both firs
questions 81 0linnana"
| Yes
Burns and Brennan were standing
around while Jasnowski was question
ing Glinnan?"
They were In and out Of the room.
| Wasn't The $1,000 mentioned for
services during the conversation In
that room?"
For services and assistance In the
Wabash matter. was the way Brennan
put II. I think"
"And when. did Jasnowski ask Gin
nan II the money was for his voter
Toward the last"
And the stenographers were
lthere?"
Zone was always there"
What did Gilman start to tell
when Burns shut him upf'
He started TO tell about coming up
to the once for position when Mr.,
Burns interrupted. saying he did not
want any cloudy statements"
Prosecutor Frazer then took the
witness.
did Burns warn Gilman, before he
made any statements.ss as to his
Yes"
| Mcnamara objected to Fraser read.
Ing to the witness from q statement.
transcript of testimony In police
court. The objection was overruled
and Frazer asked q question which
the court then ruled out.
II object to the prosecutor reading
from police court testimony" again
protested McNamars.
The witness can testify to CONVEX.
sation that he heard between Burns.
Brennan and Gilman" ruled the
court. 49, ~ ~ s,ss
Frazer: did Green plead with
Gilman before or after Burns told
the defendant about his rightsT
An objection to this was sustained.
Other attempts by Frazer to have
Conn testify again to statements
made on direct and cross-examination
were frustrated by the court The
| prosecutor and, the court appeared to
be out of patience with each other.
did Burns say anything to Gilman
about Green's promise to give him Q
Job II he confessed?" Fraser asked. Z
The witness refreshed his recollec-
ton from police court testimony and
said:
"Mr. Burns said Mr.. Green had no
right to make such Q promise
Objection was made to the answer
and II was stricken from the records.
II want al the conversation In ref.
srence to the Job In the record" said
the prosecutor.
II don't think that any statement
that Burns made to Gilman II compe-
tent" said the court.
Mr.. Frazer then announced he was
through with the witness.
Charles H. Jasnowski. assistant
prosecutor. was next recalled to the
stand.
Prior to The examination In police
court In the conspiracy case. did you
know the PROSECUTOR had sent for
Judge Connolly after the arrestsf Z"
/ The question was objected to by the
prosecutor and ruled out.
Kennary then asked: Were you
present when Shepherd asked Con-
molly what arrangements could be
made for immunity for I'D. schrei-
ter?''
The court allowed an answer over
the prosecutors objection.
II don't recall meeting with those
parties," was Jasnowski's answer.
Ksnnary asked the question In an
other way. and . long argument Gu
sued, the opposing attorneys and the
court participating, the answer being
finally allowed. Jasnowski stated
that he did see Judge Connolly In
the prosecutors once, but did not
hear any Of the conversation.
Kennary then reverted to Jasnow.
skis conversation with Gilman. The
witness said that he did not rscolIect
any specific amount Of bribs money
being mentioned. either by the alder
man or himself. Jasnowski was then
- - q l.