The Glenwood post., 1914-11-14
NOTICE OF ADJuDICArIONs FROM
CON CREEK AND BAKER CREEK.

r
CON CREEK AND BAKER CREEK.
Pablie notice is hereby given to all
Peeaeas, associations, and corporations
Interested as owners or consumers in
any ditch, canal or reservoir in water
district No. 20, and particularly from
Cee Creek snd from Baker Greek, 10
sid water district, that on the twenty
seventh day Of October, A. D. 1914,
ths following order was by the Dis
tzict Court Of Garfield county, Colorado,
nsAs and catered, to wit:
0tste of Colorado.
County Of Garfield sS'
IN THE DISTRICT COURT.
In tie matter of the sppica-
tioas Of Caleb II. Conwell,
1ixxie L. Baker, and David
Baker for adjudieations of
their priorities of right to
the use of water for irriga-
tion purposes through the
Sec9nd Enlargement 4 Ex- ORDER
tension of the Conwell
Ditch from Con Creek; the
Baker Cannon Ditch from
Baker Creek and the First
Enlargement of the Baker
and Bowdish Ditch from
Con Creek, in Water Dis
trict No. 10.
Now on this twenty seventh day Of
October, 1914, upon the application Of
Caleb. H. Conwell, one of the above
named petitioners, and upon good cause
shown, it is ordered that a hearing
in the above entitled proceeding be
had before said Court on the fifth day
of December, 1914, at the hour of two
o'clock in the afternoon of said day,
and that notice thereof be given by
publication and posting as required by
law;
Done in open court.
BY THE COURT.
JOHN T. SHUMATE,
Judge.
And now therefore, in pursuance of
said order you are notified that the
said Caleb H. Conwell, Lizzie E. Baker
and David Baker, will, before said
court, in the Court House at Glenwood
Springs, Garfield county, Colorado, on
the day and at the time SO ordered,
apply for adiudications, Of their rights
to the use of the waters of Con Creek
and of the waters of Baker Creek, all
tributary to Roam Creek, in said water
district, respectively as follows, to-wit:
For the said Caleb H. Conwell and to
his Second Enlargement l. Extension
of the Conwell Ditch from Con Creek,
and by reason of said enlargement,
one-tenth of one cubic foot Of water
per second of time of the waters of
! said Con Creek, with priority right
! relating back to and dating from April
1, 1892, besides an additional amount
of water from said creek through said
! enlargement Of eight one -hundreths of
one cubic foot of water per second Of
time, with priority relating back to
and dating from May 10, 1914, all for
irrigation purposes, and absolutely for
use upon nine acres of the said Con
wells land lying under said Second
Enlargement and being irrigated there
from:
For the said Lizzie e. Baker and TO
her Baker Cannon Ditch from Bake
Creek, for irrigation purposes. one half
| of time of the waters Of said Baker
Creek, with priority right relating back
to and dating from April l. 1909, an
solutely and for use upon twenty-five
acres Of the said Lizzie E. Bakers
land lying Hereunder:
For the said David Baker and to his
First Enlargement of the Baker and
Bowdish Ditch from Con Creek, abso-
lutely and for irrigation purposes,
ltwentyfour one-hundreths of one cubic
foot of water per second of time of
the waters of said Con Creek. with
priority right relating back to and
dating from May Is, 1904, and for use
upon twelve acres Of the said David
Bakers land lying Hereunder.
You are further notified that said
petitioners will ask that said cause
stand continued on the. docket of said
court until I'll the remainder of their
irrigating season hereafter. turn into
ments and said ditch, have been
brought under irrigation with waters
Commissioner of said water district
be by the court instructed to in each
irrigation season hereafter, turn into
said engagements and into said ditch
additional amounts of water from said
sources as said petitioners respectively
shall bring additional acres under i--
rigation, in the ratio of one cubic
foot of water per second of time to the
fifty acres of land, such diversion,
however, to in no event exceed as to
the said Conwell two-fifths of one cubi:
foot of water per second of time; sas
to the said Lizzie E. Baker one and
two-tenths cubic feet of water per
second Of time. and as to the said
David Baker seven tenths of one cubic
foot of water per second Of time;
You are further notified that at said
time and place, you may be and appear
and protest the granting of the priori-
ties of petitioners herein. and NAV
present your proofs for or against any
priority of right to water by appropri-
alton sought to be shown by petitioners