davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The day book. [volume] (Chicago, Ill.) 1911-1917, 1914-05-02

scattered. Bescher, Doyle; Meyers
and Evers each collected three hits.
Two of DoyIe's were doubles.
Catcher Fischer of Brooklyn made
two bone plays that gave Philadel-
phia lead in the first inning. Both
teams batted hard. CraYath got four
hits, Daubert and Magee three each,
and Wheat a double and triple. Reul-
bach was the only effective. Brooklyn
pitcher. ..,.
Maxwell oUtpitched WiHett, and
Browns SloUfeds lost their third
game. WiIlett got a pair Of doubles.
Buffalo batted MoselY hard in the
sixth inning, scoring four, runs to
down Indianapolis. Campbell, KaUff
and Young each registered three hits.
Old Frank Smith yielded three hits
to Kansas City and blanked them.
Cullop pitched his first Federal game
and should have won. Otto Knabe
punched three singles, and Doolan
got a double and single.
MISCELLANEOUS SCORES
st. Patrick, 8; Holy Trinity, 5. .
st. Ignatius, Is, De La Sale, A..
St. Cyril, u; St. Rita, 4.
Armour, 8; Monmouth, CO.
St. Phillips, 6; St. Joseph, 2. :
-O-O- Il
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14
Order to Present Claims Within Three
Months.

Months.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
County of Brown. s.
In Probate Court.
Special Term. October 10th, 1914.
In the matter of the estate of Conrad
Gewecke, deceased.
Letters of administration with will
Gewecke. deceased, late of the Civ
of New Uln in the County of Brown
and state OF minnesota being granted to
It Appearing on proper proof by affidavit
Charles GrussendOrf, made and fled here
in, as provided by law, that there are no
debts against the estate of said deceased:
the same is hereby allowed from and after
the date of this order in which all persons
having claims or demands against the
said deceased, if any there be,a required
to file the same in the Probate Court of
said County, for examination and allow
ance, or be forever barred.
It is Further Ordered, that the 6rst
Monday in February 1915, at 10 o'clock
a NJ, at General Term of said Probate
Court, to be held at the Court House in
and the same hereby is appointed as the
time and place whom and where the said
Probate Court will examine and adjust
said claims and demands.
of such hearing be given to all creditors
and persons interested in said Estate, by
fort hwith publishing this order once in
each week for three successive weeks in
the New Tim keyiew,a weekly newspaper
Dated at New Ulm, this 10th day of
October. 1914.
BY the Court.
GEO. Ross,
(Sean Alb Judge of Probate
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14

-
arrival Of the first settlers in New Ulm,
the nature of the celebration If there is
to be one held in connection with the
meeting to be left entirely with the
executive committee. The deficit, if
any, OF this years celebration is to be
paid out of the general fund.
The following officers were reelected:
Pres, Albert Steinhauser; Vice Pres, ].
2. Graft; Secy., William Pfaender, Jr.;
Treas, William julius; members of the
executive committee, Adolph G. Meile,
Mrs. L. G. Bell and Mrs. L. B. Krook.
Mr.. and Mrs. William Mack of Belview,
Redwood County and Herman F. Setter
OF Tracy were outside members who were
present.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14
Order of Hearing on Petition for Deter
mlnation Of Descent Of Land.

STATE OF MINNESOTA, County of
Brown; In Probate Court:
In the Matter of the Estate of Ernst
Hesse, Decedent.
On reading and filing the petition Of
determine the descent Of certain lands de-
scribed therein as belonging to the above
named decedent in his life time, who died
more THAI five years prior to the date
hereof:
1t Is Ordered, that said petition be
heard, aud that all persons interested in
the estate of the above named decedent
pc and appear before this court on the 5th
Probate Court Rooms in the Court House
at New Ulm in said County and then and
there, or as soon thereafter as said matter
why. said petition should not be granted
Let notice of said hearing be given by
the publication of the order of this Court
in said matter in the New Ulm Review,
according to law.
Dated October 9Th, 1914.
(SeaD CE,. Ross,
Alb Judge of Probat e.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14
TAKES OFF DANDRUFF.
HAIR STOPS FALLING
Save your HaIrl Get Is cent bottle
Of Danderine right now-Also
stops itching scalp.

Thin. brittle, colorless and scraggy
hair is mute evidence of neglected
scalp; of dandrun-that awful scurf.
There is nothing so destructive to
the hair az dandruff. It robs the hair
OF its lustre, its strength and its very
life; eventually producing feverish-
ness and itching Of the scalp. which
If not remedied causes the hair roots
to shrink, loosen and die-then the
hair falls out. fast. Al little Danderine
tonight now-any time-wiu- surely
save your hair.
Get Is cent bottle Of Knowiton's
'Danderine from any drug store. You
surely can have beautiful hair and lots
Of 1t II you will just try little Dan
derine: Save your hair! Try It!
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14
/ BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS.

Notice is hereby given, that meeting
Of the Board Of Public Works of the City
of New Ulm will be held at the office OF
the City Clerk Of said City, on the goth,
day OF October 1914, at the hour Of Z 80
O'Clock z. M. Of that day, for the purpose
Of considering and making assessments
of benefits to and upon the real property
deemed by said Board to be especially
benefited by reason of the making of the
following local improvements, to wit:
For the grading, crawling and boule-
varding Of Washington Street in said
city, from 9Th South Street to 7th South
Street.
Any and all persons interested in said
assessments shall have the right to be
present and to be heard at said meeting.
Dated New ,Ulm, Mimi, October 9Th,
1914.
VIM. BACKER
41-42 Clerk of the Board of Public Works
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14
Order to Examine Accounts etc.
STATE OE MINNESOTA
Comfy of Brown (SS

STATE OE MINNESOTA
County of Brown
In Probate Court
Special Term, October LIST 1914.
In the Matter of the Estate of Leopold
Gruener, Deceased.
On reading and filing the petition OF Gus
tav Gruener, the administrator with the
will annexed of the estate of Leopold
Gruener, deceased, representing among
other things, that he has fully adj
ministered said estate, and praying that q time
and place be fixed for examining and allowing
the account of his administration and for as
signment of the residue of said estate to the
parties entitled thereto by law.
It is ordered, that said account be examined
and petition and application for the allowance
of said claims and debts SO paid by him and
not yet allowed according to law, be heard by
this court on Thursdaythe 10Th day Of October
A. D. 1914 at 10 o'clock q. m. at the Probate
Office in New Ulm in said County.
And 1t is Further Ordered, that notice the e.
Of be given to all persons interested, by pub
fishing this order once in each week for three
successive weeks prior to said day of hearing,
in the. New Dim Review, weekly newspaper,
printed and published. at New Dim in said
Dated at New Ulm the 1st day OF october
A. D. 1914. ~
(seaD GEO. ROSS.
4O-42 judge Of Prnhat "a.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14
NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS.

State of Minnesota, lss
County of Brown.
District LOurt.
j Ninth Judicial District.
Jacob Neubauer. ........ Plaintiff
Maria F. c. Altman, Henryl
Bachor, and Jacob Neibauer,
the unknown heirs of said Ma
ria F. & Altman, Henry Bach
or and Jacob Neibauer, and also Defen-
all other persons or parties un- dants.
estate, lien or interest in the
real estate described in the COM
plant herein,
Notice is hereby given, that an action
has been commenced in this Court by the
above named Plaintiff against the above
named Defendants; that the object of
said action is to have said Plaintiff adj
judged the owner in fee simple and emit
tied to the possession of the real property
in the complaint and hereinafter de-
scribed, and to further adjudge that the
other persons unknown have no right,
title, estate, interest or lien in or to said
real property or any part thereof
The real property affected by said action
is situated in the County of Brown in the
State of Minnesota and is described as
follows, to wit:
Lot number two ~ in Block number
ninty-eight (9S) south of Center Street in
the City of New Ulrn, according to the
sthe Office of the Register of Deeds in and
Dated September 18th. 1914.
ALBERT STEINHAUSER,
Plaintiffs Attorney
S9-l New Ulm. Minnesota
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14
ELECTRICIAN INJURED AT MILL.

H. C. Kendall, one of the worlmen of
the Allis-C Chalmers people who are in
stalling the new switchboard at the
Eagle Mill had his hands burned Tuesday
morning by unwittingly grasping a
short circuited wire while he was at work.
The injuries are not serious and Mr..
Kendall expects to get back on the job
in four or five days.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14
COMPANY READY FOR oPER-
ALTON.

these dies alone cost 100000. Electro
lite is placed in the bottom of the zinc
box and the carbon is set in the middle
OF the cylinder. The carbon is covered
with manganese which is pressed around
the carbon with trip hammers of which
there are three in use, one each for the
different sizes of batteries. After this
is done it is covered with cheese cloth
and the electro is complete. After the
electro has been placed in the cylinder
on top of the electrolite the cylinder is
sealed up with sealing wax or asphaltum
and the battery is complete and ready
for use.
+ Six different chemicals are used in the
mixture and all of them are imported
from Germany. The company has
enough chemicals on hand for $50, 900
batteries, 100000 paper boxes for the
batteries, 1000 multiple boxes for autos
and gasoline engines and $4,000 carbons
for the small batteries and 1000 of the
larger ones.
In time the company will manufacture
for the trade different novelties, chief
among which are the electric cigar
lighter and the fly and insect killer.
The company expects also to install it's
own laboratory to prepare most of it's
own chemicals. This will be Mr.. Jaeger's
work, because of his thorough knowledge
of chemistry. One machine is expected
to arrive by the end of November. This
was ordered from Germany some time
ago. With this machine one man and
two boys can press 10000 electros for
Nos. l, 2, 8, 4, and batteries used for
pocket flash lights in day.
The company has already two sub
stantial orders to fill, one for 300, 700
batteries and one order for 100000
batteries Of special size which was
received but few days ago. The out
look is quite bright for New Ulm's new
industry, especially if it can be demon
strated that the battery manufactured
here is As per cent better than any other
on the market as Carl Jaeger the inventor
so confidently claims.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14
Legal Advertisements
SUMMONS
State of Minnesota, IS
of Brown.

District Court.
Ninth Judicial District,
Jacob Neubauer ........ Plaintiffs
Maria F. c. Altman, Henry
Bachor and Jacob Neibauer, the
unknown heirs of said Maria f.
q. Altman. Henry Bachor and
Jacob Neibauer, and also all
other persons or parties un- Defen.
known claiming any right, title, dants.
estate, lien or interest in the
real estate described in the COM
plant herein,
The State of Minnesota, to the above
named Defendants:
Auu and each of you are hereby sum-
noned and required to answer the COM
plant of the plaintiff in the above entitled
action which is filed in the Office of the
Clerk of the District Court of the Ninth
y Judicial District in and for the County OF
Brown and State of Minnesot a, and to
sservea copy of your answer to the said
complaint on the subscriber, at, his
office in the City of New Ulm in said
county, within twenty days after the
service of this summons upon you, exclu-
sive of the day of such service; and it you
the time. aforesaid, the plaintiff in this
action will apply to the Court for the relief
demanded in the complaint.
Dated Sept. 18th, 1914.
ALBERT STEINHAUSKR,
Plaintiffs Attorney,
New Ulm. Minnesota.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14

to the New City Site.
To Junior Pioneer Banquet.
In Traverse for board and lodg-
ing for company =. .....$ 6.25
Same Day in Blockhouse at Swan
Lake q. 0U
3 -Four men looking for land at
Flamboise $50
a Same place four men ....... $50
5 For grub on the way rs
6 In Cottonwood for grub ... $50
Same place for riding thru Cot
tonwood district by the Indians rs
-Four men over the ferry ..... 40
Arrived the same evening in Traverse
y Travelled to the farm house east
of the lake for grub $50
Here gave to Henle to pay.fo
board at Traverse .... SO. 90
8 In Cottonwood for meals for
company. Observation-Disclosures. 200
For the guide over the rs
Palmer for coffee from the Fort 800
8 At Flamboise for meals ..... $50
For five buffalo robes at SIS per ". Is. 90
Schwartz for fare from St. Paul to
LIE Sueur .......... 4.UO
The same on account for boots and
SHOES Observation-Disclosures. 0.OO
Is Before Voehringer's departure
for meals at Flamboise 1 rs
At same place Massopust for
.a . "a - -
writing report ............... 1.5O
Brand for trip from Traverse to
Swan Lake 100
Leonhard Haeberle, the same 90
Friedrich julius, the same 1 90
Walser advanced for boarding in
LIE Sueur for 8 men, for Voeh-
ringer, 2 for Surveyor and 8 for
Meyer, total $50
Bill Of Mr.. Voehringer from Oc-
tober 18th. 4. %. 70
For one pound of candles so
Lard and butter loaned from
Zettel ....... $50
One tape for measuring so
Board for Palmer at the Fort rs
IN aoulCl0n TO this record there IS an
old almanac in the possession of Miss
Alice Haeberle which bears the date
1854 and contains the following infor-
nation: Away from Chicago, Sept.
p, Galena, Sept. %, From st Paul,
Sept. ~, LIE Sueur, Sept. 20, Traverse,
Sept. 30, Swan Lake October j, stayed
over night in the woods, back to Traverse
October 2, New Ulm Site Octob r 8.
Leonhard Haeberle, David Haeberle,
Keck and Martin Wiedenmann chopped
the first logs for block house October
18th, u days no bread, nothing but
potatoes and onion soup, no lard and no
butter"
Four Of the piopers howe could not
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14

Andrew u. LleDl,. ...............
..................P Plaintiff,
Hugo Kahlfeldt, Alma Kahlfeldt, Oscar
Kahlfeldt, Christian Probst, Johann
Mayer, Conrad F. He'd, II. Edward
Ralmler, Jacob Brust, William Brust.
1ha-es H. Brust, Peter X. Klauk, DR.. C.
W. F. Fischer, Lille Fischer, Bertha
Fischer, Gebhardt Sherman, Frederick
G. Melges, Frederick Tenne, German
Land Association of Minnesota, Nicolaus
.Schld, George Mueller, Mrs George
MQe..er, and julius Rosenthal also all
other persons unknown claiming any
right, title, estate interest or lien in the
real estate described in the complaint
The State of Minnesota, to the above named
Defendants: &
You and each of you are hereby summoned
and required to answer the complaint of the
Plaintiff in the above entitled action, which is
filed in the Office of the clerk of the District Court
of the Ninth Judicial District in and for the County
OF Brown and State Of Minnesota, and to serve
a copy of your answer to the said Complaint
ION the subscribers, at their Office in the city of
New Ulm in said County, within twenty days
after the service of this summons upon you,
exclusive of the day of such service, and if you
fail to answer the said Complaint within the time
aforesaid, the Plaintiff in this action will apply
to the Court for the relief demanded in the Com
plant IN
Dated October 8, 1914.
SOMSEN, DEMPSEY & MUELLER
Plaintiffs Attorneys,
New Ulm, Minnesota.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14

Hugo Kahlfeldt, Alma Kahlfeldt, Oscar
Kahlfeldt, Christian Probst, Johann
Mayer, Conrad F. Held, H. Edward
Baumler, Jacob Brust, William Brust,
Charles H. Brust, Peter K. Klauk, DR.. c.
W. F. Fischer, Lille Fischer, Bertha
Fischer, Gebhardt Sherman, Frederick
G. Melges, Frederick Tenne, German
Land Association of Minnesota, Ncolaus
zSchild, George Mueller, Mrs. George
\ Mueller, and julius Rosenthal, also all
other persons unknown claiming any
right, title, estate, interest or lien in the
real estate described in the complaint
herein, Defendants.
Notice is hereby given, that an action has been
commenced in this Court by the above named
Plaintiff against the above named Defendants;
that the object OF said action is to have the Plain
tiff adjudged the owner in fee simple and entitled
to the possession of the real property in the
plant and hereinafter described, and to further
:adjudge that the Defendants above named and
also all other persons unknown have no right,
title, estate interest or lien in or to said real
property or any part thereof
The real property affected by said action is
situated in the County of Brown in the State of
Minnesota, and is described as follows, to wit: 81
Lots Nos One U), Two (2), Three (3), Four (4),
Five (5,, Six (6), Seven C7), Eight (s), Nine (9),
Ten do), Eleven CD, Twelve u2), Thirteen 13)
and Fourteen O4), in Block No. One hundred
sxth-eight Q6S); and Lots Nos. One ~, Two ~,
Three (a), -Four (4), Five (5), Six (6), Seven CO.,
Eight (s), Nine (9), Ten uO), Eleven u1), Twelve
Q2), and Thirteen u3), in Block One hundred
sixty-nine 169), all South of Center Street in the
City of New Ulm, Minnesota, according to the
plat of said city on file and of record in the office
of the Register of Deeds in and for Brown County,
{ Minnesota.
~ Dated October 8, 1914.
8 SOMSEN, DEMPSEY & MUELLER
Plaintiffs Attorneys,
New Ulm, Minnesota.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14

Notice is hereby given, that an action has been
commenced in this Court by the above named
Plaintiff against the above named Defendants;
that the object of said action is to have the Plain
tiff adjudged the owner in fee simple and entitled
to the possession of the real property in the COM
plant and hereinafter described, and to further
adjudge that the Defendants above named and
also all other persons unknown have no right,
title, estate, interest lien in or to said real
property or any part thereof.
The real property affected by said action is
situated in the County of Brown and State of
Minnesota, and is described as follows, to wit:
Lots Nos. One ~, Two (2), Three (3). -Four
"a, Five o., Seven 60, Eight (s), Nine (9), Ten
90. Eleven uD, Twelve (12), Thirteen Q3),
and Fourteen (14). in Block No. One hundred
sixty-seven Q6O, and Lots Nos. Ten QO). Eleven
QD, Twelve (12), Thirteen (1s) and Fourteen az,
in Block No. One hundred fifty-six (156), all
South of Center Street in the City of New Ulm,
Minnesota, according to the plat of said city on
file and of record in the office of the Register of
Deeds in and for Brown County, Minnesota.
Dated October 1, 1914.
SOMSEN, DEMPSEY & MUELLER
Plaintiffs Attorneys,
New Ulm, Minnesota.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14

There is more Catarrh IN this section Of
together. and until the last few years
was supposed to be incurable. For great
many years doctors pronounced it local
disease and prescribed local remedies, and
by constantly failing to cure with local
treatment, pronounced it incurable. Sci
ence has proven Catarrh to be a consti-
tutional disease, and therefore requires
constitutional treatment. Halls Catarrh
Cure, manufactured by F. ]. Cheney &
Co.. Toledo, Ohio. IS the only Constitu-
tional cure on the market. It is taken in
spoonful. It acts directly on the blood
and mucous surfaces OF the system. They
offer one hundred dollars for any case It
fails to cure. Send for circulars and tes-
timonia1s.
Address: =. :. CHENEY CO., Toledo, Q.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14

See Roy Berg About Galvsnizsd
Steel Culverts. 26tf.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14

The State of Minnesota. to the above named
Defendants: "
You and each of you are hereby summoned
and required to answer the complaint of the
Plaintiff in the above entitled action, which is
filed in the Office of the Clerk of the District
Court of the Ninth Judicial District in and for the
County of Brown and State of Minnesota, and
to serve copy of your answer to the said Com
plant on the subscribers, at their Office in the
City of New Ulm in said County, within twenty
days after the service of this summons upon
you, exclusive of the day of such service; and
If you fail to answer the said Complaint within
the time aforesaid, the Plaintiff in this action
will apply to the Court for the relief demanded
in the complaint.
Dated October I, 1914.
SOMSEN, DEMPSEY & MUELLER
Plaintiffs Attorneys,
New Ulm, Minnesota.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14
SUMMONS.
Andrew G. Il

vs..
GoJ!ieb Melges, Anton Schwaertzler,
Charles Waldschmidt, Bernhard Won
Claim, H. M. Greenland, Michael
Cooper, Michael Groepper, Catharine
Groepper, Herman Groepper. Edward
Groepper, Emma Groepper Feenstn.
Lizzie Groepper Howard, Adele Groep-
per Hodges, Charles Groepper, Alice
Groepper Stanwood, Joseph Hartneck,
Gustavus Willius. Anna Ertel, August
Nagel, Mary Ann Nujent, Aloysius
Schmelz, Anton Schwaetzier, Louis
Field, Hugo knott, August Kratsch,
Nelson w. Dickerson, William Spoer-
base, William Spoerhause, also all other
persons unknown claiming any right,
title, estate, interest or lien in the real
estate described in the complaint here
in. ..... Defendants.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14
SUMMONS.

State of Minnesota, District Court
County of Brown. Ninth Judicial District.
Andrew G.. Liebl, Observation-Disclosures.
plaintiff
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14
NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS.

State of Minnesota, District Court
County of Brown. Ninth Judicial District.
Andrew G. Liebl,
j.. Plaintiff,
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14

Address: ,. J. CHENEY . CO., Toledo, O.
Sold by Druggists, 75c.
Take Hall's Family Pills for constipation.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-10-14
NOTICE OF LIS PENDENs.

Gotlieb Melges, Anton Schwaertzler,
Charles Waldschmidt, Bernhard Won
Claim, H. M. Greenland, Michael
Cooper, Michael Groepper, Catharine
Groepper, Herman Groepper, Edward
Groepper, Emma Groepper Feenstn,
Lizzie Groepper Howard, Adele Groep-
per Hodges, Charles Groepper, Alice
Groepper Stanwood, Joseph Hartneck,
Gustavus Willius, Anna Ertel, August
Nagel, Mary Ann Nujent, Aloysius
Schmelz, Anton Schwaetzler, Louis
Field, Hugo knott, August Kratsch,
Nelson w. Dickerson, William Spoer-
base, William Spoerhause, also all other
persons unknown claiming any right,
title, estate, interest or lien in the real
estate described in the complaint here
in. Defendants