The Richmond Virginian. (Richmond, Va.) 1910-1920, 1914-05-07
OPINION GIVEN;
CASES ARGUED
YESTERDAY IN
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT
COURT OF APPEALS.

The United States Circuit Court IF
Appeals reconvened yesterday morn
( Ing at 10 o'clock. with Circuit Judges
! Pritchard and Woods in attendance
The court announced and handed
down It's opinion in the following
! case:
No 1912. Illinois Surety company.
/ plaintiff In error and cross-defendant
+ in error. VS. Faith Granite company
Ell al, defendants in error and cross
plaintiffs in error. Error to the Dis
trict court at Columbia, s. c. Opin-
ion by Judge Knapp. Affirmed.
( Cases argued yesterday:
+ No. 1855. Meyer Schwartz, plain
tiff in error VS. United States. 0e-
PENDANT In error Error to the Dis
! trict court at Philippi. w. Va Ar
eqed by Joseph r, Curl. Wheeling w.
/ Va: John c. Palmer, Wheeling. w
Va and A. NJ. Belcher, Charleston
". Va. for the plaintiff In error, and
by Stuart W. Walker, L. s attorney,
Martinsburg. W. Va. and John A..
Z Howard Wheeling. w. Va, for the
I defendant in error
No 1856 Paul Scoric, plaintiff IN
I error VS.. same. Argued by same
counsel.
4 Case in call today:
1 Ne. 1243 Ernest c. Heckert. plain
tiff in error. VS. Central District and
4 Printing Telegraph company. a cor
porafion. defendant In error Error
10 the District court at Phiiippi, w.
Va To be argued ny Warder & Rob
inson Grafton. ". Va. for the plain
: tiff IN error. and s. Meredith,
Fairmont. w Va. for the defendant
In error.
J The court announced opinions in
I tho following cases Tuesday;
I No 1915. Henry schmulbach, ap-
pellant VS.. George W. Caldwell and
Lester Drake, partners doing business
under the firm name and style Of
| Caldwell & Drake appeilees. Appeal
! from the District court at Parkers-
burg. w Va Opinion by Judge
! Pritchard. Affirmed.
! No 1918. l. n. George Lumber
Co. Inc. appellant, VS. l. s. Daush-
! erty and T. Fl. Mickey, co partners.
trading as Daugherty, Mickey & Co:
J. s. Moore & Co, and the United
! Lumber company, appellees. Appeal
from the District court at Richmond.
Va. Opinion by Judge Woods AZ
ARMED.
/ No. 1921. II. ]. Mclauris Jr,. ap-
pelant, VS. w. r. MCLAUGHLIN. as re-
/ ceiver of Tdnson Lumber company,
anu Az an 4iEIIH anu ~ ~ M
Lauchlin. appeiIees. Appeal from
! the District court at Charleston, s. c.
! Opinion BY Judge Knapp. Affirmed.
No 1925. VI, Y. Moore & Co, ap-
pellant, W Harry NJ Gilmore. trustee
4 in bankruptcy Of Canton Co-Ope-a-
tive company bankrupt, appellee.
/ Appeal from the District court at
Ashevilie. y. c. In bankruptcy.
| Opinion by Judge Knapp, Affirmed
No 1880. Norfolk and Western
Railway company, plaintih-in- arFeE'
T IS Sarah r. Holbrook, administrators
Of ". T Holbrook. deceased, defend
ant In error Error to the DistrIl1
court at Roanoke. Va. Opinion by
Judge Woods Affirmed.
No 1924. Paris FARRELL, simeon r
FARRELL ct al. appellants, vs. James
q, Cole and Clinton -ane. appellees
Appeal from the District court at
Charleston. W Va. Opinion by Judge
Knapp. Affirmed,
Case argued Tuesday:
No. f2s6. Eugene t. Younge. plain
tiff in error, VS.. the United States al
America defendant in error. Error
Ito the District Court OF the United
states for the Northern District al
West Virginia. at Philippi Argued
by Charles NJ. Murphy and A. G. Jen-
k!ns. Phlippi. W. Va, for the plain
r. tiff In error, and by Stuart ". Walk
er. L S. attorney, Martinsbnrg, W
Va for the defendant in error, and
submitted