Eagle River review. [volume] (Eagle River, Wis.) 1890-1927, 1914-06-19

uho buchanan OF Illinois.
eionss 10 the Bridge and Struc.
.ural iron Workers union and 49,
International president four vears.
sonn A. Key of Ohio, a member - +bo
typographical union: George y -
man OF Illinois: Isaac /. Sherwood ~
o Davld j. Lewis Of MARYLAND q
nemDer OF the miners union: Charles
?. smith of Buffalo, N. Y. a memher
VI lne typographical union. Rohar+
=. Lee OF Pennsylvania, member Of
me miners union: Edward Heating Of
colorado, member of the Typograph-
lcal union; John ]. Casey of Pennsvl-
wanna. a member of the miners union
ana Guy /. Helvering of Kansas
me Republicans are: William ]
cary OF Wisconsin, who was a tele-
graph operator; John R. Farr Of Penn
sylvanla, Typographical union: q p.
roberts Of Nevada, and Albert John.
son of Washington, member Of the
International typographical union.
me Progressive union card man in
the house is John l. Nolan Of Califor.
MA, who is member Of the Interna.
t1onal holders union.
These men have worked in the omen
and aggressively for the cause OF la.
Dor. They have been helped by such
members of congress as they could
influence and they have managed to
secure a strategic position in the
house.
Five of these men are members of
the committee on labor and it may be
said that virtually they control it.
David J. Lewis of Maryland is chair
man OF the committee. Other union
members in the committee are Maher
OF New York, Casey of Pennsylvania,
Heating of Colorado and Nolan Of Cal
ffornia. representative Baltz of I'LL
nofs, member of the committee, is a
farmer and it should be remembered
that farmers also are seeking exemp-
ton for their organizations from the
action of the antitrust laws. Not one
of these men is a member of either
the committee on judiciary or that of
interstate commerce. in which the
antitrust bills originated.
Wilson on Business Depression.
Every official in public life in Wash
ington and every other man, too
NATURALLY desires to have business
safeguarded, big business, as well as
which are now before the senate,
after having gone through the house,
are supposed to supply the means OF
getting after illegal business and to
make unpopular the forming of trusts
or combinations in restraint of trade.
Will the legislation which is now in
the course of passage do what it is ex-
pected to do?
The other day when the representa-
tives of manufacturing industries OF
two middle western states called on
President Wilson and spoke about
business depression, Mr.. Wilson told
them that they were in a psychological
state. He said in effect that II there
was business depression in places it
was simply because his visitors had
feared trouble and therefore had
caused it by doing things suggested by
fear rather than by reason.
There are a good many progress
sively inclined members of all parties
in congress, some people call them
radicals, who say the Democratic ma
iority in the two houses likewise is
suffering psychologically. Is this true?
There are some things which are Ger
tain because they are apparent to the
most casual observer. The antitrust
measures when they we're first formu-
lated were exceedingly drastic and
they seemed to carry out every prom
ise which had been made during the
debates of recent years, that laws
finally would be passed which would
kill every trust that existed or was
supposed to exist in the United States.
Are the Bills Drastic Enough?
The bills as finally drawn and &C
cepted are not SO drastic as originally
they were. The question now remains
whether they are drastic enough to
mt illegal trusts out of business and
TO prevent the lOTuldIlOA "a sum
trusts in the future. The Democrats
saw that the bills when made into law
will accomplish this end. The Pro
gressives and the progressive Republi-
cans say that the bills will do nothing
Of the kind, and there are some Demo
Gratis who seem to agree with their
opponents. On the other hand there
are conservative Republicans who say
that the bills go too far and that they
will hurt business generally while be-
ing aimed only at illegal business.
From this can be learned how vary
ing is the viewpoint concerning the
antitrust bills which the senate is
now discussing. 1t will take consider
able time for the ensuing laws to
proye either their power or their i'm
notence. So it is that the final results
Of the antitrust legislation probably
will not show themselves in the COM
ing congressional campaign. Some of
the Republicans say the mere fact that
the bills have been passed and the un-
certainty concerning legislation has