The Raymer enterprise., 1914-02-12

"A tooPNAotAoh khC pioddttioh hAA
marketing of butter will take of even
a small part of the burden of the farm
ers' wife. II 1t will give her time to
straighten up from her work q. table
and tub and leave her free to remem-
Der that she is a human being with a
head and soul. II 1t will permit her
to get of the farm oftener than once
in ~ wears-if cooperation will do
this or help by ever SO little to do it,
the woman on the farm Is for co-opera-
ton.
An unsliIant lrishman.
We have found one man here in Ire
land who is opposed to cooperation.
Walking along a country road near
Omagh We came upon shrewd faced
Irishman who was very ready to talk
about cooperation. He was evidently
man of some intelligence and, judg-
ing from his manner and address, a
man OF some experience and success
in business. So we engaged him In
conversation about cooperation and
its effects.
Il am against It," he said. There
Is no sense in It," And he gave US in
forcible and picturesque language the
story Of how he had been personally
injured In his business by coopera-
tion. 1t developed that he had been q
buyer Of farm produce-a commission
merchant in small way. Now there
10 no money In It," he said, since the
margin between what the city man
pays and what the farmer receives is
cut down. The farmer sells through
the cooperative organization directly
to the city merchant" Reluctantly he
admitted that maybe 1t was better for
the farmer and better for the city con-
sumer who had little with which to
buy food. "But it's hard on us COM
mission men. It's putting US on the
rocks. am not buying butter at all
any more. The cooperative creamery
here has run me out"
We asked him II cooperative butter
making did not make the work OF the
farmers wife and daughter easier.
"Of course it does" he said. And lit
tie good 1t is doing them. They don't
have to skim the milk and churn and
mold and salt the butter now and SO
they go galavanting over the roads on
their bicycles. They don't stay home
at all any more. They're worse about
gadding than city women" and he
shook his head with misgivings.
So, II 1t be true, as our Irish friend
In his self pity proclaimed, that CO.
operative butter making and butter
marketing is going to make 1t cost the
consumer less and net the farmer
more, We suggest that both maker and
eater will be for it, the ex-commission
merchant to the contrary notwith-
standing. They will both In city and
country be interested in seeing coop
GRAFTON accomplished. Certainly the
country woman who feels the burden
Of butter making will welcome a pro-
cess by which she is to get an oppor-
tunity to see something besides the
top OF the cook stove and the inside of
the big chnrn. And we do not believe
that the ordinary American farmer
will object to cooperation even II it
does give his wife and daughter time
to get out upon the road in buggy or
on bicycles.
, The omash Creamery.
When we learned that the Omagh
Cooperative Creamery system OF mar
keting was cutting down the margin
Of price between farmer and consumer
was both raising the price to the
farmer and lowering the price to the
consumer. we concluded that it was a
concern worth considering. Even the
accusation that made 1t possible for
the farmers wife and daughter to get
out on their bicycles occasionally did
not unduly prejudice US against 1t. The
0magh creamery is capitalized by con.
tributions from 600 members who In
vested from five dollars, up to $3.50
each. But the voting is not by shares.
1t Is on the one man one vote plan.
The five-dollar man votes just as often
and as forcibly as the $250-dollar man.
The members voting thus elect a
board Of directors. These In turn have
the best man they can get as manager.
But he must be more than a butter
maker. He must be q good business
man and an expert in marketing. No
matter how much money Is made, It
must all 90 back to the members in