davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Parisian. (Paris, Tenn.) 1907-1962, 1914-10-16
BIRDS Disturb slumbcrs.

Hartford, Conn.-Roman candles
we're used to rout thousands Of star
lings and grackles from the treetops.
Citizens complained the birds dis
turbed their slumbers. ,
The Parisian. (Paris, Tenn.) 1907-1962, 1914-10-16

SALE EXTRAORDINARY
OCTOBER INVENTORY
/ TEMPLE OF ECONOMY
THE NEW YORK STORE
On account the European War many the merchants forced to
raise prices all fabrics Ready Garments, Shoes etc.
Our considered plan whereby you
dollars during your fall purchases by calling where will
find anup -o-dae stock of merchandise consisting of
Dry Goods Ladies Ready Dresses Coaks Mems Clothing
Overcoats and Hats Misses Dresses and Coaks Boys Clothing
And Complete Assortment Ladies' Mems Boy and Misses Shoes
The New pleasure announcing during moh
fortunate making large purchases for department heard of be-
before the advance of2O which merchants had buying their fall
merchandise falls But establishment has the
patrons We feel that duty stand them
hdmsha Now onmdoHe
will to kdmucnnd open
spcdoab
This sale OF up merchandise will
9 and it will continue for 80 days.
BE SURE AND COME AND GET YOUR SHARE OF BARGAINS
SPECIAL NOTICE
To those trade will Sc in mercha
settle
at the above
BoletiÌn mercantil de Puerto Rico. (San Juan, P.R.) 18??-1918, 1914-04-20

A mocion de la parte apelada fue sus-
pendida hasta nueva orden la vista del
case de SUCCESSION de Leonardo Igarav1-
dez ct al v. Rubert Hermanos ct al, So
bre devolucion de bienes Illegal y vo-
luntariamente rematados, senalada para
ell Il de los corrientes.
En- los casos del Pueblo de Puerto
Rico V. Esteban Padilla por infraccion
de las ordenanzas municipales de Areci-
bo Sc dictaron sentencias declarando
con lugar dichos recursos y revocando
las sentencias apeladas que dicto la Cor
te de Distrito de Arecibo ell 27 de Ma
yo de 1913, absolviendo, por tanto,
al acusado, debiendo cancelarse cual-
quier ianza que haya prestado.
En- ell caso del Banco Comercal de
Puerto Rico V. Carlos Rodriguez Attic
ry eft al, sobre cobro de dinerO, sc die
to sentencia confirmando la de la Cor
tete de Distrito de San Juan, Seccion
la. de % de lDiciembre de 1913
Tamben fue confirmada la sentencla
de la Corte de Distrito de San Juan de
% de Diciembre de 1913, en- ell case de
Ramona del Carmen Figueroa " Tere-
sa Diaz ct al, sobre declaration del ca
racter de hija natural reconocida.
BoletiÌn mercantil de Puerto Rico. (San Juan, P.R.) 18??-1918, 1914-04-20
Corte Suprema

Fur ,usprndida hasta nueyo Senala-
nfirnfo. > Z sirsad ic moci6n de la par
a. i.mandamir. IA vista del case dc
~implria kamirrz 3 Francisco f. Mar.
fimel >,br. cobro IL dinero scialada
para 81 lila Il de les corrienteS.
En % caso de Compania Industrial
de ~auiurcc. Pedro Bolivar :. cn C.. v
Felipe San..liez os0rio. sobrc cobro de
pe~p. ~ ronrcdlo al apelanic una pro
rro-a de - dias contar desdc cl -
dr I"- eorrienic> para pre>cntar alcga-
Co.
Eu % ra>o iel Pueblo dc Puerto Rico
E,i~ban ortiz. por injuria y calun-
uia. declare sin lugar 81 rccurso Y Sc
rouarm' Ia ,entencia quc dict6 la Cor
ie dc DiNriio le San Juan. Secci6n Sc
gnda a .'u dc Enero de 1914.
ramhien se celrbr5 Ia vista del caso
evil de Tracy Bartholomew y Josephine
ID. Cr.s,ey Il al. >obrc cumplimicnto de
rouirato. ron inlorne ie los abogados
!. II. Brown y Frank Antonsanti
En II raso de l.amas y Mtndez y. Co
iia kufai q Jose La q. Figueroa. sobre
ierceria. >r dici6 rrsoluei6n dcclarando
ron mgar ia mo.ion dc los dcmandan-
tes q apclados n en su yirtud desesti-
mando Ia apclaci6n interpuesta por el
dcfnandado bose la q. Figueroa contra
seniencia DE- la Coric de Distrito DE IIu-
macao dc 23 dc Dieicmbrc dc 1913.
En Jos ca,os de Victor Gutierrez Or
tiz 8. Isabel Diaz. vida. de Isidro Rive
ra. = Miguel Nogucras. como albacea
icsiamentaro dc Isidro Rivera sobre
honorarios fueron desestlmadas las
aprlaciones interpuestas por los deman-
dados contra las sentencias he la Corte
de Distriio de Guayama. de II de Ju-
nio b. 1913
BoletiÌn mercantil de Puerto Rico. (San Juan, P.R.) 18??-1918, 1914-04-20

~ celcbro la vista de- la mocion so
bre correction g. autos presentada por
la parir apclada y ia del recurso cn
,u fondo cn e.. case de Bernardo Pc
dro Quiniero q. Justlna Morales, sobre
memorandum a. costas en cat0 Sobre
rnirrga dc bienes. con informcs dc los
apogados Ramon Falcon y Jose Il. f.
~atag.. no habicndose opuesto el ape
lanfe 4 la moci6n de correction de au-
,o,. ed Tribunal orden6 So uniera al eX-
prd ntc la copia ccrtilcada del secre-
tauo te la Corie de Disirito de San
Juan. que.la acompana
~r rrlebr5 a. vista del Case del Ban
co Oomer.ial he Puerto Rico V Carlos
kodnglez Artery. sobre cobro de di-
nero. c0n informe del abogado don An
tonic SarmientO.
En ei caso De- mandamus del Pueblo
de Puerto Rico Y. Central Fortuna, Sc
declare CON lugar la moci6n del abo-
gado Francis +. Neagle a los efectos
de aciuar en este casO concrete como
abogado defcnsor de la demanda.
BoletiÌn mercantil de Puerto Rico. (San Juan, P.R.) 18??-1918, 1914-04-20
Vida femenina
LA GRAN JARDINERA.

\ Mistress Martinau es la espOsa de IN
Bilustre abogado de Londres. EIa estu-
Adiado la Horticultural con entusiasmo y
/ es autora de una revoluci0n Ell ell arte
Idle la jardinerla.
\ Actualmente Sc encuentra Ell Amerl-
jca del NOrte dando conferenciaS Y dl-
lrigiendo los trabajos de modification de
1jardines en- muchos de los mas mpor
Itantes parques de aquella gran cludad
Mistress Martinau. sin renegar de lc
que sc conoce por jardinerla inglesa
|lleva ella 10 que considera su compile
mento. De clio 10 mas esencial es Ia
agrupaci6n de flores por su color. Has
ia aqui conoc1anse los macizos de plan
taS con flores de todos los dolores. Ell
sistema de esta innovadora establece
\ los macizos de color uniforme.
Su lena es ell de la unidad dentro
\ de la variedad. >
\ LAS MUJERES DE MUNICH.
\ Cuenta un diario berlin6s que un
agente de seguros de vida contrajo ma
/ lhimonio con una joven de Munich
FL matrimonio Sc instal6 Ell una casa
I de uno de los barrios extremes de la ca
pital bavaria pero la felicidad Ell ell
nuevo hogar no fue muy duradera. Las
| Ninfdelidades del agente obligaron su
esposa a deiar ell domicilio conyugal,
refugiandose en- el de sus padres.
| FL desahogado marido no ta1d do en-
IlleVar su casa una amiga de no muy
envdiable reputation Las vecinas del
bartio juzgaron offensive para elias,
para la moral para el buen nombre de
| la ciudad bavaria, que una intrusa usur-
pase su puesto a una mujer legltima y
! digna, Ell nutrida manifestation Sc
encaminaron a la casa del citado indi-
viduo obligaron a la amante de este a
labandonar aquella vivienda.
Tn grupo de trescientas muJeres Sc
encamin6 despues a la casa de los pa
dres de la esposa ultrajada y pidieron
4 esta que fuese con elias q poseslonar
Sc del domicilo que le correspondla por
perfecto derecho.
Asi hubo de hacerlo la mujer del
agente de seguros, y aunque despues
volvi6 a reuhirse con sus padres, que
do bien establecido que las mujeres de
Munich no permit1an que los derechos
de una esposa honrada sean desconoci-
dos y ultrajados.
FEM1NISMO TURCO.
FL Gobierno turco ha atendido los
ruegos exigencias del feminismo del
pals con una discretion y un sentidoI
practice dignos de loa.
En- efecto, la muJer ttlrca tendra ac-
ceso d las Universidades, donde cursa-
ra la especialidad de ginecologfa.
Ademas Sc trata de establecer escue-
las para la instruction completa del be-
1lo sexo en- cuanto Sc refere a econo-
mia domestica, hygiene, lactancia y adj \
de hospedaje, cuestiones
tan descuidadas hasta ahora EN- los pai-
ses meridionales
Las feministas turcas sienten inmen-
50 i1bilo por 10 que consideran una
(Contin1a en- Ia 6a, plana))
BoletiÌn mercantil de Puerto Rico. (San Juan, P.R.) 18??-1918, 1914-04-20

En- el caso de IldefonSa MelendeZ V.
Joseph Camden Redinger, sobre dlvor-
10. se dict6 resolution teniendo pOr de-
sistido al demandado y apelante de la
apclaci0n interpuesta contra la senten-
Ella dc Ia Corte de Distrito de San Juan,
Secci0n 2da.. de - de Octubre de 1913.
En- cl caso de Joaquin OronOz Rod0n
y. SuSano Montalvo eft al, sobre inJunc-
ion para recobrar la possession mate
rial dc propiedad inmucble, Sc dict0 re-
Somci0n declarando con lugar la mo-
ion de la parte demandante y apelada,
IS en- Su virtud deScStimando la ape
lacion interpueSta por el demandado
SuSano Montalvo contra la Sentencla de
la Cortc de DiStrito de Aguadilla de
Is dc Fcbrcro de 1914.
I'm 81 mandamus del Pueblo de Puer-
@ Rice Y. Francis +. Neagle Sc dict6
.c>oluci0n declarando sin lugar la mo
In del fiscal de este Tribunal para
1u. Sc L. permita al abogadc Robert
ed. law clerk dc la oficina del Attor
General. asistirIo Y ayudarlo en- la
ruuducci6n de este caso el Tribunal
ual reSoluci6n recay6 Ell el manda
del Pueblo DE- Puerto Rico V Cen
tral Fortuna.
En el case del Pueblo de Puerto Ri
. v. Juan b. Monagas, sobre loter1a
ut confrmada la sentencia apelada
ilr dict6 la Corte de Distrito de Sar
.uan. Secci6n 2da., el Is de Octubre
io 1912.
En- el recurso gubernativo de Apoli-
Jria Torres vda de Hernandez v Ell
cgistrador de la Propiedad de San
IN. Secci0n Ia, Sc dict0 resolution
8cando la nOta dc dicho Registrador
- dc Febrero llltimo en- la parte en-
Iue ha sido rccurida. . sea en cuanto
onSigna como fundamento para dene-
,ar la inscription del credito hipoteca-
rio cediio, falta de causa para dicha
cesi6n
BoletiÌn mercantil de Puerto Rico. (San Juan, P.R.) 18??-1918, 1914-04-20
ABRIL 16.

Sc celebr0 la vista del caso de Pagan
Lopez y Co. Y. Mayagjiez Dock y Ship
oing Co.. Sobre recobrar la possession de
1icnes inmuebes con indemnizaci0n de
Ianos y perjuicios. con informe del abo-
gado don Jose de Diego.
Fueron senaladas para vista el lines
20 del corriente d las dos de la tarde las
mociones sobre correction de autos Y
dissemination de apelaci6n presenta-
das por los demandados Nicasio Jose
Pic. Pedro Barnardo, Y Maria Salome
Arsuaga, Ell ell case de Norberto Ar
suaga y Ramos V. John Doe y Richard
Roe, como herederos desconocidos de
Ignacio Arsuaga Izaguirre, sobre de-
claracion de hijo natural reconocido.
En- el caso del Pueblo de Puerto Rico
" Serafin Alvarez, socio de A. Alvarez
IIermanos. sobre infracci0n de la ley de
rentas internas, Sc cOncedi0 al apelan-
te una primera pr6rroga de 20 dias d
contar desde ell Is de los corrientes pa
ra presentar alegato,
The Richmond Virginian. (Richmond, Va.) 1910-1920, 1914-08-25
Mr.. Tucker and the Liquor Question.

The picture of Our Harry which Is being
published an advertisement by the liquor in
terests OF the State with what he has had
say on local option has a very panied look
IT, and reminds one somewhat of Huerta. II
has not that hail fellow we'll met look that
usually characterized him when around hunt
ing votes. Doubtless 1t is due to the company
no is keeping We do not blame him for having
panied expression his countenance. When
arrays himself against the moral forces
Of the Commonwealth in effort 70 per-
petuate such traffic the liquor traffc, 1T Is
perfectly natural that he should have twnges
that show In his face,
or Mr.. Tucker does not say word
IL his letter TO Judge Christian in defense Of
he sa loon; he does not mention the saloon at
all, nor. liquor, whskey, nor anything of
agreeable things. and makes attempt to
persuade people that their liberties at stake
If hey surrender local option to Statewide pro-
hjhiton.
Mr.. Tucker does not explain what became Of
he liberties of the majority OF the State when
he Mann law ard the Byrd law forbade local
option elections and the sale of liquor in the
greater part of the State. in all the rural sec
lions except for few months in the year at
Watering places under certain restrictions II
local option dear a principle, where
was "Our Harry when the Mann law and the
Byrd law quietly being enacted with very
lttle objection from any quarter except from
the liquor men who have always fought local
option iust hard they are now fighting
"prohibitton,'' until the time when they
had to choose between local option some
thing stronger, and then they fought
fully for local option just as they are doing
now?
Mr. Tucker would have the people believe
that everything is wound up and in Vir
ginia strictly on the local option principle.
matter of fact there is probably no State
in the Union in which the local option prin-
ciple. which he would the people believe
L. the same as local self-goVernment, violated
than in Virginia,
Mr. Tucker was unfortunate in citing the dog
law, the compulsory education law and several
others. which have to be adopted locally be-
core becoming operative. Most of these laws
represent cowardice and evasion of RESPONSE
bity the part of members of the legislature.
and have nothing to commend them.
crippled proposition in the State OF Virginia.
! being imperative in many relations as II Is
operative. It has been entirely disregarded
where there for dsregardng It,,
and there incontrovertible reasons for dis
regarding ii in the disposition of the liquor
question The fact is principle of govern
ment, 1t seems to be honored In Virginia more
in the bench than in the observance. There
are the strongest reasons why it should not
rule in all effort directed toward removing the
evils that have the State from the
sale of Intoxicating liquors-Staunton Leader.
The Richmond Virginian. (Richmond, Va.) 1910-1920, 1914-08-25

Bishop John c. Kilgo has addressed
the following letter to the ministers
Of the Virginia conference Methodist
Episcopal Church. South;
Dear Brethren.--I have just re-
turned home from a trip through sec
tions Of your conference. where / de-
livered several addresses in the inter-
est OF temperance and prohibition.
This Is throughout your Common.
wealth at this time a leading question.
All your citizens are deeply concerned.
1t is matter OF supreme Importance
not only to Virginians. but to all other
Southern States whether your State
remains under the policy OF the open
bar-room or adopts the policy OF
Statewide prohibition. 1t is to be ex-
pected that the Christian ministry.
and especially our Methodist ministry
will take an active part In behalf of
temperance and the elimination OF the
whiskev traffic from Virginia. You
have now an opportunity to deliver
vonr Commonwealth from this great
evil.
Our Southern States are fast becom-
Ing prohibition States. Our people
have learned enough about the untold
harm Of the open bar-room and have
decreed its death. Here in North
Carolina we have driven II from
among u.s. The adjustment OF the
legalized whiskey traffic has worked
results far beyond the expectation of
the most hopeful. There Is not a bet
ter enforced law on our statute books
than the law against the sale OF whis-
key. 1t is the rarest thing to see
drunken person. In fact. during these
years OF prohibition ! have not seen
dozen drunken persons In the city OF
Durham. OF course, there are some
who hate the success OF prohibition,
and, therefore, make false reports
about 1t. but North Carolina Is forever
done with Il II tho question were
up for another election the majority
against the open bar-room would be
three times larger than 1t was at the
former election. You can not know
what 1t means to have this traff1c
driven from our midst.
l shall pray constantly for your
success In this important fight for
Righteousness. You will be among
those who labor hardest in behalf of
temperance in your State. Let moth
ing discourage you. Tho curse of
God 10 upon this legalixed evil. and II
will be . good day whom Virginia
The Richmond Virginian. (Richmond, Va.) 1910-1920, 1914-08-25
CRITICISE MIR. FUCKERS LETTER

fortine, indeed, it is to this enemy to enlist a
respectable man.
Now. If Mr.. Tucker meant that "all things are
lawful. but all things are not expedient." refer
him To abundant statistics If he meant that
prohibition In inconsistent with principles Of
Democracy he will have to stand fire, MIR.
Tucker is a man Of learning; II is hardly seemly
for anyone to remind him that the States have
never surrendered their police power TO the
~cdcral government: that this power is eXer-
cised by the state for the purpose of protect
ing the health, safety and morals of its citizens
That the liquor trafflc mas long been fiji SUBJ
,ect for the exercise Of this power by the legis-
l0ture, Mr.. Tucker well knows Is Supported by
Overwhelming authority and Is hornbook
proposition. The Supreme of Indiana,
Oregon. Illinois, Louisiana. Idaho. Michigan.
Missouri Iowa, Alabama, Virginia, South Da-
kota, Arkansas, Delaware, Kansas. Georgia
Pennsylvania, New York. North Carolina, New
Jersey and Maryland have held and the Supreme
Court Of the United States has twelve times held
that there Is no inherent right in citizen OF a
State 10 sell liquor because Il = not ordinary
The Richmond Virginian. (Richmond, Va.) 1910-1920, 1914-08-25

Ldt0r Virginian:
Sr.-~-In G recent letter TO Judge George l.
Christian copy Of which was. In som" manner
procured and published by Of the liquor
papers IN Richmond Hon. II. ST George Tucker
oppressed himself against Statewide prohi-
hilton: While this personal letter, ad-
dressed TO Judge George J.. Christian, and not
Intended to be used ammunition by that
ciaas' into whose hands Il fell Il has been SO
used. and It's side stepping Of the issue. its
ebrlrd illustrations and maudiin, hac6neyed con-
clusion should he exposed.
This letter handles the question daintily
ard gfngsrIy. that II is misnorner 70 cali II
IN expression Of views whether It's thnr
IL "a friend enemy ri the saloon. IL mas been
Used In a manner which indicates That he is the
former, The author rides the rather fatigued
local sea- governsn cnt hobby 10 Il boarder, which
approaches the limit. II this stronghold does
net hold out. Mr.. Tucker may nnd himself
charged ny the people OF Virginia with giving
~ and comfort 10 the enemy. And hew com
The Richmond Virginian. (Richmond, Va.) 1910-1920, 1914-08-25
TUESDAY. AUGUST Is, 1914.
ONLY HOUR WEEKS FOR WORK.

Four weeks from today there viii take place
the election en- the question Of Statewide pro-
hibition This question is the most important
that has been before the voters Of Virginia in
many years 1t is a eleancut issue freed from
every political consideration and presenting for
decision the one single issue Of saloon or no
saloon The issue is Shall the partnership be-
tween Virginia and the liquor traffic be dissolved
The temperance people OF Virginia are at the
climax Of their long. hard fghr Tor the submis
sion Of the question of Statewide prohibition TO
the voters Of Virginia There IS no question
that deserves larger or more representative
vote. There is 10 issue that could be cleaner
cut The liquor traffic is making the hardest
fight in Virginia that 1t has made in any State
where the question Of Statewide prohibition has
been submitted. II is spending more money
employing more reprehcnsihe methods. and, II
possible, STOPPING to more INSCRIPTIONS tactics
than it has ever done before
This fight Of the temperance people eliminated
I'll the passage OF the Enabling Act and the sub
mission Of the question TO the voters The fight
OF all Virginia is now on The leaders of the
temperance cause, and the people fighting for
righteousness in Virginia. have felt confident
through all these years that they had the sup
port OF the majority of the citizens of Virginia
The time Is now approaching when that belief
viii BE- put to test What Will the result be?
For the Issue to be lost now VIII not only
mean that tina sale OF liquor will continue. viii
not only mean that the lawless liquor dealers Of
Virginia viii continue to contribute to the VIC.
laiiou Of the law Of The land and will Of the
communities that have tanishcd the liquor traf.
f. from their borders It will mean far more
than tha'. let not the voter In dry territory
who has been, perhaps. SO long freed from the
curse u the open saloon as to have lost some
o. the consciousness of this debaucnng institu.
ton-ei bju not lay the dattering JUNCTION to
his soul that this Is not his hght-for il is the
6ghf ~ all Virginia on a matter Of Statewide
momenf TO drive Stateliccnsed and State
ieralized curse from The bounds of the whole
state After the 22nd Of September She saloon
can only exist in virginia If a majority of the
voters Of this State desire the State to be part
ner IL the liquor business. The defeat Of the
fnabline set at the polls would mean that the
liquor business In Virginia would take new
lease Of fife. and from fear of the long DELAYED
6ay o. re trihution. the liquor dealers and their
eliies, would come to the position whore they
would be- NOT on the defensive hut would take
TIE agRr sslve would b. emboldened 10 ga for
ward IN ,ae strengthening Of tho liquor cause
I would fe ar oDen question as to just when
every locality that now has driven the saloon
from, its borders might be forced to 30 again
through THE fight against tho 1{reuual har IN
The Richmond Virginian. (Richmond, Va.) 1910-1920, 1914-08-25
People VIII Do the Work.


In this issue Of the Democrat an advertise
ment appears in which extracts from letter
written by the Hon. Harry St George Tucker
are quoted. Mr.. Tucker says that he favors
the local option principle. that for years we have
had in this State local option fence laws. local
option dog laws local option road laws, and other
LEGAL option laws All Of this is true. The peo-
pie can when they choose considerable
territory with option law. The people OF Nir-
einia have the right TO include the whole State
under the law and call 1t Statewide prohibition
The people of the State OF Virginia have the
same right to say what shall be the law in the
whole State with reference to the prohibition
Of the liquor traffic as they have to say with
eference the prohibition Of gambling any
thing else which the people believe to be hurt
full The people Of our State believe that the
sale of liquor Is productive of lawessness.
poverty and crime, and will say that the
people have right to refuse to license any
thing which the people believe to be productive
of evil rather than good.
The people Of the whole State have a right
to express themselves any question which Is
Statewide. License for the sale and manufac-
ture of liquor is a Statewide question. No man
can sell manufacture liquor without State
license. The State and not the county grants
this privilege. If the State grants the license
for the manufacture and sale OF liquor It has
the right to prohibit the manufacture and sale.
If the people choose to do Mr.. Tucker lays
great stress the right Of the people to de-
eide for themselves, and that Is just what the
people going to do in this State, and they
not inclined to decide the liquor in
tcrests want them to decide.
Mr.. Tucker talks about the dog law. What
good would a prohibition dog law do Bedford
IL Richmond privileged to ship all OF her
cur dogs to this county, just as that city Is now
shipping Its liquor into Mr. fuckers dry terri
tory and other dry territory Of the State. We
would like to hear delivery OF Mr.. Tucker
this feature Of the liquor license question
Mr.. Tucker need not give himself any trouble
about the hasty action of the people. The peo-
pie of this State have been very patient They
have for years known OF the curse OF the
,egaiized liquor traffic. They have been planning
a means of Kidding the State of this curse They
have thought it over deliberately and have set
September %. 1914, to do the work, and they
are going to do a good job and don't you forget
it.--Bedford Democrat
The Richmond Virginian. (Richmond, Va.) 1910-1920, 1914-08-25
Ministers Urged By Bishop to Work
Hard For Prohibition

Joins other States in the South in thu
overthrow OF this traffic. / trust oua
people will follow your wise LEADER
ship in this effort to save their home
and the homes Of their neighbors from
the unspeakable horrors wrough, hJ
bar-rooms. II Is a cause which de-
serves all the faith and labor thai
good people can give II. shall look
for the good day when your historical
Commonwealth declares freedom
from the bondage Of this evil.
Yours sincerely,
JOHN G.. KII.GO.