Pine Bluff daily graphic., 1914-10-04
CIRCUIT COURT
 BEGINS TOMORROW Seventy nine Civil Suits Set for Trial During Three
 Weeks. SUITS AGAINST BANK Actions Instituted Against Bank of
SUITS AGAINST BANK
Actions Instituted Against Bank of Pine Bluff Directors by Sheriif and City Treasurer Fixed
 for g3rd.

Judge A. B. Grace will convene the November term of circuit court for Jefferson county tomorrow forenoon, when grand and petit juries will be organized.
 Seventy-nine civil cases have been set for trial between tomorrow and October 24, at which time the crimi- nal docket will be taken up.
 The suits of Sheriff and Tax Co1lec- tor Edgar Brewster and City Treasur- CT F. M Reeves against certain stock holders of the defunct Bank of Pine Bluff are set for Friday, October 23. The officials are suing to recover an aggregate of $15O,000 of public monies on deposit at the bank when it ceased business. Both officials have made settlement, and whatever amounts are recovered through the suits will go to the officials, their bondsmen and certain stockholders in the Bank of Pine Bluff who aided in raising the funds needed by the officials.
 The suit of c. E. Phirpot vs. the board of directors of the Jefferson
 
 on Thursday, October 15.
 Settings For Week.
 Suits set for trial during this week follow:
 Monday--Sarah l.. Robinson vs. Louis Dessisseaux; Stewart Wells vs. Ex Parte; R. D. Whitley vs. E. A. Richardson Luda Estes vs. The Pine Bluff Company.
 Tuesday -Cornelia A. Drake vs. City Of Pine Bluff: R. M. Fletcher Slave & Lumber Company vs. F. L. Sjires, ct al; State of Arkansas vs. w.. E. Dudley and A. J. Mitchell; State of Arkansas vs. w. w. West and E. T. Fuller.
 Wednesday, Sarah Temple, A. A.. O. N. M. s. vs. w. s. Helton; J. w.. Gray vs B. D. Drake; William Brooks vs s. B. Banks; State of Arkansas vs. A. M. Hooker, ct al; John Williams vs. Drainage District No. ? of Jefferson county.
 sa Thursday--M. c. Cross vs. Warren .E. Williams; l.. H. Gammill vs. St. Louis I. M. & Southern Ry.; M. S.. Winters vs. St. Louis I. M. & s. Ry.; M c. Winters vs s. Louis I. M. & s.. Ky.
 Friday-Arthur Murray vs. w. A. Sparks; Samuel w. Peebles vs. Emin- ent Household of Columbian Wood- men; Pullen Richardson Chemical Company vs. l.. R. Jones; Alfred Dorr ct al vs. F. B. Tomlinson; Board of Improvement. Paving District No. 26 vs. E. !. Watterson ct al.
 Saturday D. l.. Trimble vs. Vest ern Union Telegraph Company; T. C.. Brewer vs. P. B. o. Elks; l.. C. Grant ys. w. R. McCord; Monk & Ritchie vs. Pine Bluff Hotel Company.
 The Jurors.
 Those summoned to serve as grand and petit jurors during the term arc as follows.
 Grand Jury-J. M. Reynolds, W. N. Bridges, w. R. Willis, J. Walker Jones, E. w. Williams, T. M. Phil lips, T. F. Carr, w. P. Notes. H. B. Speers, M. c. Hollis, J. B. Avery, w.. D. Hearn, A. w. Nunn, George P. Darby, E. c. Arnold. D. l.. Franklin, Alternates- Adolph Bluthenthal, Hen sry Marx. T. B. McEwen. Claud Clegg, Joe F. Alexander R. T. Louthan.
 Petit Jury-M. l.. Hoffman, P. ". Pratt, c. R. Redfield. c. F. Campbell, A. H. Musgrive. Freelan Waites. K. l. Ingram, R. H. Mosely. w. c. Jalks, J. H. Fatsin, J. H. Hankins, B. F. Adams w. M. Hardister. Louis G. Louthan, M. F. Blakely. w. l.. Davis. l. N. Neil, II. ID. walter, K. s. Baughman. J. l.. Jul Han, Frank l.. Harwell. ]. l.. Jul lian, Frank L. Harwell R. l.. Atkin- son, Charles F.. Bair, A. c. Poole. Alternate-A. M Barrow IT,, Arthur Brewster. H. Bringman. F. R. Bloom, Henry Jordan. E. A. Schicker. Julius Leitner. A. k. Ussery.