The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1914-05-16

. MI MHn'oH--i rloNe " suihc '"' ""''
The Court WIZ strike tnat out
Mr.. Manton-and move 10 s'rlNe OUT
about seeing the money
The Court-Motion denied.
Mt Manton-ENcepuoi.
Mr. Whitman-That is All
"Licd to Save Ny Husband"
,., l., - ,u.... ,-,.,
iou tesIneu III souI nuso"u ula'
nlh not you "sheu M 'i"i'''"' ." WV"
ing tne s, .',,, ~. yoso,,o.y
s"' reP" se,r Nr Gr"shi since
~ lou nave see" 'hi' ''o'"' ''''''
'nen "a ies, S., 49,. rtr,, Ahou,
u Wneh ulu you sec MN ~ fN>
three na!s ago A.. Al, o.. .t-
was Una, 'ile w . =, -. II, -, 90
" pa you ever ten any oo'y W "
three days ago any .hlhs ABDUL t"s 'o"-
rersation? a. Yes, SIR A, ~
= Dld you teil .iroeni 'rs' ~, A. 80 -
stein. ,,,, ,,.,.,.,,
VINO " me- n, "apo' NJ ~ ,,,
~ iou S"ore WI ,''' "fe' Wv
OF your husband A. fes. s.r'
Y. About THIS. Ihat wa, No,en ,,
W.. ~ 'Vu au ,h.rs and giving This
oeihe askeu you '"er' ~"
answers W. Nh'e 70" WIZ =" W.
ment In Jour presence niu y"u "ra, 40 '" IN
Rose say any thihg !" '"ur n" .,,, an.
sn. "s Wu v.s.,,bnj, A. No"
Did you say 'hAf A. Ne"' nv" W
q. wait n minute. Answer the ques-
ton. A.. Yes, sir.
O. Did Rose tell you 60 say that You
Med 10 save your husbnndf ~ No. sir.
L promised my husband
Mr.. Manton-l object TO that ana move
70 strike IL out.
0 The Court-Strike 1t out
.. O. Did YOU answer this question IN TINS
way: 20. Did YOU hear conversation De-
tween Jack Rose and your husband ana
the others? A. No. sir Did you answer
that way: A. At that time. yes, SIR
q You were under oath then too, were
not YOU? A. Yes, sir.
O You did not? 4. No DID You
swear to that on trial" A. Yes.
Mr.. Manton-That Is all
Have YOU told this same story before
you told 1t to the District Attorney. TO
anybody else besidesy' asked Mr.. WHIT
man
"Yes, sir" said Mrs. Rosenberg
Mr. Manton-I object TO that' anu
move to strike Il out. 49,,
The CONTRADICTION denied. sne mas
already testified that she toid i'aoo' noP'
attain.
Mr.. Manton-Exception
O. Have you told II to others!
Mr. Manton-Objected TO as incompe-
tent, irrelevant and immaterial ooJec-
ZION oyerr,lled
becker Grips Table Hard.
,,.. T., .tia ,,oras
IL III dH"uR " p'e'ue ~ lronnaJ
inc scene 40 60 -. stt.,c. of The
court room. Every man OF the jury p'nt
.viIabl. Becker from whatever emotion,
~ may have been simple establishment,
er,nned hs I'd the table in front of him. His
,swvnra yyha. time they were not object
inc sat with sober faces
Mrs Roscnberg's testimony occupied
lass than half an hour OF the time OF the
court. Previously and subsequently the
D,strict Attorney essayed to prove by un-
ahiectIop,ble witnesses, men and women.
thc essential statements in Jack Roses
,.stinony. practically all of Roses state
rnsnts In fact. save those referring to
Racl,.r,s direct connection with Lefty
ouie,s hand. That had been brought out
q, uas claimed by whitman, by Shapiro
"a Opally nv Lillian Rose nberg
The informers were gone from court.
,,, ~ the case forever II may be- Man
,nn had torn from them even the rags OF
m.,odrama that clothed their wicked
nesses
80 far as they were concerned 1t had
h.en ,eft 10 the Jury to determine whether
ar not such jackals OF the underworld
could snarI the truth about any man, They
had hecn useful. mainly In aiding the Dis.
trict Attorney 20 establish the sequence OF
events that led to the murder and to the
arrest OF Charles Becker and his indlct'
,nent with swceter atmosphere IN
cour, Il was necessary for Whitman &c
produce confederation.
Other Links In Whitman's th"'"'