Bisbee daily review., 1914-11-19
THIS GOES FOR ARIZONA"

THIS GOES FOR ARIZONA"
 In the editorial columns Of an Arizona contemporary, we ind the following:
 "The Arizona corporations boastingly say they arc "our of politics" They might also add that they will soon be out if the present trend of political conditions can be judged indication of future do- ings When business interests get big and mighty that they taking American citizens interest in politics. they are drifting the rocks of disaster We do not believe that the big companies should dictate politics. but they interest in the affairs of state If the business of Arizona would take the interest in politics they should conditions would be remedied in Arizona in mighty short order"
 On a following page the editor who wrote the above says further Agtators business disturbers assisted in the development any community. This goes for Arizona"
 The periodical which these quotations are taken nooriousy corporation batter It has consistently sneered at BIC BUSINESS and the men who dcn thed with BIG BUSINESS. Yet taking warning from the recent elections sounds the ocsn of alarm "Ag tators and business disurbers assisted in the dc veopment of any community. This goes for Arizona" it tells its readers
 Here is a hopeful sign! Here is m indication periodical this State is avaleninsl Win a,srrer frsreaders? oAwaken-them to what?" may be asked
 In an eHcr to this query, it is necessary to turn to the corporatonbatng periodical and the loratonbaiting individual and ask these categorical questions:
 Are all corporations inherently bad just because h'y corporatons2 Are all representatives of corporato7 bad just because they represent corporations?
 Is it not a fact that respectful attention would be denied in Arizona today to any who attempted 1, go before people ayoued advocate Of corpora tons?
 To what and to whom is due the credit for whatever degree of success Arizona has attained in industrial growth and commercial prosperity?
 What are the bad" corporations in Arizona and wha are Che counts on which they should be indicted?
 Our contemporary says: we do not believe that the big companies should dictate politics. but they should take some interest in affairs of state" Win our contemporary covenant to define cor porations may properly take the affairs of Arizona what forum they may employ without mourning even insult?
 The Review holds brief for corporations It holds no brief those outside of corporations It seeks to be medium Of publicity for both It's editorial opinions  are the minstructed opinions of an individual writer These opinions expressed volunteer contribution to the gis of public discussion. The Review believes tlat good corporation is a valuable Arizona CT to any state It believes that efficiency is best pro- noted by an individual by group of individuals through organization. It defines a corporation as an organization It unqaaihedly holds the opinion that no corporation succeed which fails in its admins traton the welfare of the lowlest well as the most exalted unit in Its organization It believes with our contemporary that corporations "wil soon be out ol business if the present trend of political conditions can judged indication Of future doings" What win hc Arizonas future should the corporations withdraw will be Arizonas future its legislative reputation is such to repel the of the bushes. interests which otherwise would establish themseye. here?
 Each and initiated measure and constitutions amendment voted upon at the election con coiyed believe outside the domain of corporations They were neither inspired spohsored by the cor poratipns of Arizona. They were tine children of thu people and as such responsibility for their veal woe rests with their percentage corporations groups of operators cotton growers. railwa officials -counseled their employees against votinl for he 30 per cent and the anubaclIs measures sps