The Twin Falls times. [volume] (Twin Falls, Idaho) 1905-1916, 1914-04-14


Daube, Lillian E., tax rebate
(dis-allowed) ............. 1911
7. f. Hdw. Co., supplies Qaid
over) 1926
Utah Typewriter Elk. Co., sup
plies Qaid over) ........... 7055
Weber, ]. H., witness (aid
over $500
White, V. c., witness Qaid
oVer) .................. $500
The board at this time proceeded to
the consideration of claims against
Road Fund and having completed the
consideration Of said claims and con-
sidering the items represented by said
claims for work performed and mater
ial furnished to be legal charges
against the County ordered the Audi
tor to draw warrants against the Road
Fund as .ollows:
ROAD & BRIDGE FUND.
Coffman, c. W., I'd. overseer. -. 1000
Connor, T. D., labor. .......... 1900
Diamond Hdw. Co., mdse. :. 1900
Evans, Geo., I'd. overseer. -. 24.00
Ferrenburg, Monte, labor. -. $500
Glenn, Andrew, labor. ........ 1.25
Gem State Lbr. Co., lbr. ...... 5S.51
Hays, Lloyd, labor .............. $50
Morgan, Frank, labor. ......... 1890
Miller, Harlan, labor. .. 5.65
Nibley-Channel Lbr. Co., lbr... 1892
Purdy, Frank, assd acct &C. S.
Orm) ................ 1850
Scott, A. r., labor. ........... 5000
Taylor, G. H., expense. ....... 21S0
Whyte, DR.. j. j. labor. ...... 400
Beus, James tax rebate dds
allowed) 400
Day. j. e., labor (laid over) -. Ats
Hoag, w. b., labor 0aid over 400
McGovern, May, tax rebate dds
allowed) -. 400
Mallory, G. L., labor, Qaid over 4.50
Soutter, Is. f., I'd tax refund, Qaid
over 400
Sautter, B. G., I'd tax refund, (laid
OVER 4.00
Smith, David, I'd tax refund, dds
allowedO 400
The board at this time approved the
following estimates against the Bridge
Bond Fund and ordered the Auditor to
draw warrants against the Bridge
Bond Fund as follows.
Fox, A. E., engineering servi-
ceS ....5....... G9S.95
Harkins, VIM, on contract 2S0.30
Idaho Bridge Co., est No H.. 1251.90
In the matter of the cancellation of
Tax sale certificates Nos. Alb and Ala
sale of 1910; S61 and s62, sale of 1911
and $40, sale 1912, said certificates
covering the following described
property t0-wit:. SW Sc and NV
Sc Section II, Twp. 8, Range IA.
The board considered an applica-
ton from l.. f. Parsons, of Moscow,
Idaho, the owner by assignment of the
above mentioned certificates, reques-
ting the cancellations thereof for the
reason that the assessment included
In said tax sale certificates was err
roneous and it appearing to the salts
faction of the board on information
from the United States Land Office,
at Haley, Idaho, that final proof had
not been submitted on any Of said
land prior to January End, 1911 and
that the land was, therefore, not as
sessable for the years 1909, 1910 and
1911, the County Auditor was instruc-
ted to cancel said tax sale certifi-
Gates and to present claim for re-
fund to the said l.. r. Parsons
Thereupon it was ordered that
recess be taken until p. M, Mar. 4
1911.
G. H. TAYLOR, Chairman.
Attest: q. j. FINCH, Clerk.
March 4th, 1914.
The board convened at 1880 P. M.
on this date pursuant to recess. Pre-
sent: c. II. Taylor chairman, o. G.
Zuck, 0. E. Carlson and e. ]. Finch
clerk.
Whereupon the following proceed
ings were had to-wit:
The minutes of the previous meet
ing were read and approved
In the matter of the leasing of the
poor farm for the year 1914.
The board considered two bids pre-
viously filed, as follows:
One bid of G. A. Ball in the amount
of Two Hundred Fifty ($250.O0)
Dollars, conditioned on the County
purchasing roadway from the poor
farm to the Kimberly road, and
One bid of e. e. Heston for One
Hundred Fifty (s15000) Dollars with
no condition as to roadway, and the
board being fully advised in the pre-
misses considered the bid of Mr.. Hes
tons to be the lowest and best bid
and deeming such action for the pub
lie good the board accepted the bid
OF Mr.. Heston and instructed the
County Attorney to draw lease and
bond and have the same duly execut-
ed.
In the matter of the Petition of the
Crystal Springs Orchard Company
for compromise in the settlement
OF tax sale certificate No. 706, sale
of 1912, covering the NWH of the
SEA of Section 11-3-15.
The board considered said petition
and agreed to compromise in the set
Element of said certificate by accept
ing the sum of $3.50 on this date for
the reason that to the satisfaction of
the board the assessment on the land
for the year 1911 was gross over
valuation.
Also for a compromise in tax sale
certificate No. S12, sale of 1911,