Weekly journal-miner. [volume] (Prescott, Ariz.) 1908-1929, 1914-05-06
COURT CALENDAR
SET BY JUDGE
SMITH
ONE OF BUSIEST SEES
SIONS IN HISTORY OF
THE COURT IS RECORD
ED YESTERDAY
(From Tuesdays Daily.)

(From Tuesdays Daily)
Judge Frank O. Smith at ses-
sion of the Superior Court yester-
day morning ripped to shreds the
docket, dismissed a number of dor
mant cases, set the trial calendar,
disposed of many other suits and
actions through divers channels and
generally handled one of the bust
est sessions on record. The matters
as they were taken up and dispos-
ed of in order are as follows:
| The divorce action of Schneider
VS.. Schneider was non-suited.
The divorce action of Forest VS..
Forest was dismissed
The trial of Carl Eiberger VS.. the
A. T. and S F. railroad was set
for June TO- Eiberger is suing for
$4,000 damages as the result of
injuries received while employed
last year as a brakeman.
The hearing of the demurrer in
the case of the Commercial Trust
and Savings Bank VS.. Ross was set
for May II.
The hearing OF the demurrer in
the case of Hopkins VS.. Marguerite
was set for May II.
The trial of Thatcher VS.. The Az
tee King Mining Company was set
for June 8.
The privilege of a jury trial was
waived by attorneys for both sides
in the case OF Welch ct al VS.. Kru-
ger and the date for trial was set
for May Is.
The divorce suit Of Townsend VS..
Townsend was set for trial on May
Is.
The hearing of the demurrer in
the case of Peter Gordon ct al VS..
T. c. Snider, was set for May II.
Gordon, as administrator of the de-
ceased's estate is trying to recover
damages Pedro NJ. Alonzo was
one of the four Mexican laborers
killed in a cave-in at Clarkdale last
year. r -. .
The case of Ball VS.. the Brook
, lyn-Arizona Mining Company was
set for May Is Bali is suing for
the collection Of alleged delinquent
wages.
The case of Duncanson VS.. the
Brooklyn-Arizona Mining Company
was also set for May IS. Duncan
son is suing for wages.
Trial by a jury was demanded by
Norris and Mitchell, attorneys for
the plaintiff in the case of Frank
lin VS.. Crane. Defendants demur-
rer to plaintiffs complaint was sub
mitted and over-ruied. The trial
was set for June 10. Franklin is
suing Crane for wages alleged due
for work upon a ranch
The case of Shumate VS.. McMahn
taken up from the lower court upon
appear, was dismissed.
The hearing of arguments upon
demurrer and law questions in the
case of Eads VS.. the United Verde
Copper Company, was set for May
| II. Eads is suing for $1,000 damag-
es because of an injury received
while employed by the defendant
corporation.
The case of the Bashford- Bur-
mister Company VS.. Gomez was dis
missed. The collection of a bill
was sought.
A decree of divorce was granted
to Willard NJ. Cofield in his suit
for divorce against his wife, NATL
da D. Cofield. The decree was
granted in default of defense.
Taken by appeal from the lower
court, the case of the State of Arr
iona VS.. Carrie Neal was set for
trial oil June 9. Carrie Neal was
convicted by jury for selling
drugs to victims of the habit.
The suit of the State of Arizona
VS.. the Prescott Gas and Electric
Company was dismissed.
The case of the State of Arizona
VS.. George Kelly was dismissed.
The suit OF the State of Arizona
VS.. John Doyle was dismissed.
The hearing of arguments of law
questions in the case of the Ari-
iona Mine Supply Company VS.. the
Buffalo Gasoline Motor Company
was set down for Tuesday, May s.
before Judge Krook, Judge Smith
being disqualified from trying this
action.
The case of the Estate of Fred
Conrey VS.. f. D. Hurley was set
down for trial on June 9, before
a jury.
The privilege of trial by jury was