The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1914-06-20
APPELLATE COURT DECISIONS.
Complete List Handed Down ny
First Department Yesterday.


dent. VS.. John c. Edit, appellant. Judgment
and order. affirmed with costs. No opinion
James Edwards, respondent. VS. Reginald
n Morgan, Jr'. appellant Judsmen, and
order order n nfsrm'd with costs No opinion
In the mattel. of Laura zbrowskL de-
opinion Of Fowler, surrogate, order nisd.
Annie s. Duty, as sdministratrlx, &C. re-
Rsse R.y NsT TSss cspr H ysss
ment sndorder affirmed with costs. No
Vineenzs Canada. a. administrators. &C.
appellant, Judgment and order AFFIRMED with
e.s-ss.r s s,sl..Iss e.. SSss p
cost. No opinion Order sied, '"'a WIN
Jennie Frank. respondent. VS.. Bei.ord
order revsr.sd With costs and eo%pisin, dis dis
missed with costs. Opinion per curiam. Set
William J. Bryan. respondent, vs. Rich.
order reversed; new trial ordered. costs 10
Fsii. solomon. q A.. Sr.,ponaen,. v.
Sfmsd With anss Opinion 'ue ors.l al:d
Russell Folard, suing. 40. appellant. va
order AFFIRMED with so costs and disburse.
ments with leave TO plaintiff to amend on
p William zeiner. respondent vs.. george NV ".
Lineh. a. receiver. &c; appellant Juds-
rsa S With s S ppn to abide s: .y.n
unless the respondent stipuls,es to reduce
ss srSeS .sSs,s ana h ,h sysn, III.
pesied from will be affirmed Without costs,
No opinion Settle 9rdsr 1.S on notice ,S r.,.,
and Tratman avenues, Order affirmed with
costs No opinion. order nied.
tris, &c, respondent vs.. Central PARK North
a z. Company, appellant; Judgment and
order affirmed with costs No opinion. Or
charie, Hetherston. respondent, vs.. Cen;
Company, appellant. Judgment and order
reversed, new trial ordered. costs TO appel
40 .Oja' dnnsp '"ls. Per order SHTia% on
notice.
p' William p ' p ss Of Si~ r, ySss
~; Nth 80 cost; sHd disbursement No opiH
'us.pps GTspss,o ,,ts.sSna.n Cen
pelham Judsmsnt ' ana order T rsVeRR:s3 new
trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide
event. Opinion per curiain. Settle order on
sam Baeharach. appellant. vs.. American
U9,on hes'y s.pond. 1.
and modined affirmed. with so costs and
disbursements to defendant. opinion per
Matthew T. GoidsboroGsh. Jr., re-pon-
dent vs Richard r. Goldsboroush. appel
costs No opinion order nIed. SHotch,
kiss J, not sittinsD
Michael mshS pi Msnna ,r,sgonsasSn' Vs. coopsr
isnt. yndsmspt ana order affirmed. WITH
Nathan l. wooit appellant vs.. Isaac
H iIa o1ss =, al respSsnden,s Judsmsn,
n cty Of TS5s ,r rss:pGrdsSs,,
win Spiaion uS SiG.r nl.S Hm'a
c?%p sass .P sssisSs''I gdsm.n;
sTsA.m p y ora %'%S sG by In
James n. blossom. appellant vs. Mary
Gs's9@ sTf with nRe; sC. ' ~ SpsS
.I u the matter Of tn. e,,s. .; sarah
r., Msrry w. ss,ss r: scss
costs. 40 opinion. CLARKE. j, dissenting
Edith l.. Ro..nesun. respondent. vs.. sun
Printing & Publishing COMPANY. appellant
ofdsred" with costs 10 appsllan, To- 10 abide
event. unless the respondent stipuls,es 70
order appealed from A.. affirmed, Without
! Margaret oDowd and another, appellants.
Va r. H. Casey. Inc. respondent. Judg
men, and order Alarmed. with costs Nc
Alfred A. Whitman. respondent. VS. Alfred
s,pms spps,snt n,n,e ana Srss
filed.
affirmed with costs No opinion, order
In the matter Of the estate o, ca,herin.
e. DAILY. deceased. order Alarmed with
costs No opinion. dnsrsham. T. J.. and
DG TX. F.5 s sc: s. order s.tas ss
,o nh. sra RsSR' S Ord n,t ai'h''' Vito Mo
Tho People. &C. VI. David w.s,.r. Mo.
ticn granted. order nl.d, -
Mor,saso company, impleaded' &C, Motion
Implicated; Motion granted with 80 costs
James H. warner w. Edwin d Morgan
and another. Motion granted unless appel.
liant complies with terms stated In order
.isnatiu. cu,,ar v. william L. Abbott
Motion granted unless appellant compile,
with ps, terms stated in ords, Order n,ss
Rose Ausenbiick VI. David Israel snt
Katherine T, New and another VS.. Ann,
Burnett and another Motion denied
wv w; Russell pn;,, Root; ,pdiv,ar.ily' &C; ':
Mc,on, r sranisd unless appaisn. ce sa%S
with terms stated in order. Orders MED.
s s%as ws"s's MS,sa s ssS%G" x MsAi q,
costs, order nled.
Henry f. Dixey vs.. Henry W, Savage
| Motions granted unless appellants compl,
| with terms stated In orders Orders Med.
| Leopold Pepper vs.. Henry Wallseh ant
| another, Motion granted unless appelian
complies with terms stated In order. orde
nled,
Elmer r, Alexander. ct al, VI. rren
Tile Company, Motion granted unless ap
pelham complies with terms stated In order
order hled.
Frank We. vs., Harlan 4 Hoii!ns,wor,'
william Rosenthal vs.; Abraham l.. Kaas
Application denied. with go costs. ordei
Herman schatia vs. Morris Michel Ap
plicstion denied. with $40 costs. ordsl
e. Carl schnabei vs. American pduea
tionai Alliance. Application denied, with
SO costs order signed.
william II. Walker vs. Ike Juryan. Ap
plication denied. with 80 costs. ords
Ths Sam. VS.. the Same. Motion denied
In the matter OF Tibet, avenue Appn
cation granted. order nled.
In the matter OF Henry c. valentine
Application granted. Order Med.
BENJAMIN Gortikov Marion Gortikov
Motion denied. Settle order on notice,
Franklin b. Long ct al, VS. Lebanon Ma
tional Bank ct al Motion denied. settl
order on notice.
In tho matter Of Hamilton place Ref
erence ordered. order Med.
In the matter Of Philip 8 saitts r..
In the matter OF Sidney n. Lash. Appii
eation granted Settls order on notice