Norwich bulletin., 1914-12-12
FORECLOSURE ON
 LORDS POINT PROPERTY. Granted at Short Calendar Session of
 Superior Court,


 At the short calendar session of tho superior court here on Friday morning at which Judge M A. Shum- way presided, foreclosure judgment was granted in the suit brought by against Wolfred O. Stanton of fine same town Mir. Main sued to collect on mortgage for $5,5o0 given on Jan uary 13, 1912 on ten lots at Lords Point, East, so-called. Judgment was given in the sum of $5,983.75 with the first Monday of April, 1915, as the limitation of redemption Judgment was given in the sum of $5,9S3.75.
 The plaintiff testified that he has a mortgage on the Stanton inn and four cottages at Lords Point in Stonington that amounts to $5500. Interest has not been paid since last January. He had paid insurance of S1SS.09 The interest amounts to S300.66. The rate is per cent. There is water rent of $S2.60 due and also taxes but MT. Main was not allowed to put those in or to figure compound interest on the mortgage. The houses have been built within four years.
 Former County Commissioner B. F. Williams. said the property is worth about $5S00 and he told of the condi- ton of the place.
 Ichabod H. Stoddard, who has been builder in many places said he knew of the property and had worked on the stanton inn. Some of the houses are in good repair. He placed a value of s6100 on the property. The lots. he said, had increased in value.
 In the opinion of MT Main the prop erty is not worth much more than the mortgage. He also said he is the largest payer of taxes in Mystic
 Costs were taxed as they stand at $66.01 in the case of James H. Fitch of Preston against the town of Pres ton, which was an appeal from the board of relief. MT. Fitch claimed ex- emption from taxation to the extent of $S000 on the grounds that he was blind and unable to support himself and family. Upon the trial Judge Howard J.. Curtis gave judgment for Mir. Fitch with costs at s66.O1.
 Answer in tow weeks or default was ordered in Eastern Concrete Con- struction Co. vs. Lewis M. Young. The same time for answer on de- fault was given in Washington I. Cad bots, administrators, vs. John 1T Barnes, administrator.
 The divorce case of Arthur J. Pix ley vs. Jennie Elizabeth Pi21ey was placed on the uncontested list
 Matters that were postponed were the following: M. N. Cartier and Son Go. vs. Royal Linen Mills, Inc ap- plicadon for substitution of plaintiff QeLaulI, JEQSInenI, foreclosure, limit atien and motion for foreclosure by sale; Fanny Green vS. Abraham Bronstein, default for failure to com ply with order of court: Charles B Webher, administrator, vs. Charles H klinclS and others, motion to set aside verdict for a new trial; Lottie U. Will son vs. Maurice A. Wilson, alimony pendente lite; Jeremiah Sullivan vs Raymond J. Jodoin, to restore case to the docket; William E. EccleS xs Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co, exe- cutor, appeal from probate, argument of deTnurred.
 Extension of week was granted in Mary E. Chapman vs. ChristopheE E.. Chapman. v
 Assignments Made.
 The following assignments for court in Norwich before Judge Shufnway were made:
 \. Tuesday, December 18th, Hooper, ei al, vs, Connecticut Co, ct a1.; ;CIews vs. Doane, ct al; Andrea vs N. Y N. H. S H. R. R. Co.; Shanbaeh vs; Sum. W
 Wednesday,, December 18th, Afur- phy vs. N. Y.ssN. Fl. & 1T. R R. Go; Cranda1l vs. N.s Ys N. 1T. & IL R. R. Co; Balestrini vs. City of New Lon don
 Thursday, December 17t11, Notte vs. Central Vermont RE. Cos Nothe vS