The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1914-12-19
APPELLATE COURT DECISIONS.


rirst Department:
Edward Kemp as trustee &c. ct al. APP
pellanis, vs.. Louisa NJ. Is. Mscready ct al.
respondents. Judgment modified as indi-
Gated In opinion, and as mouined affirmed,
with costs to the appellants, payable out of
the estate. opinion by scott j. tMcLaugh.
lin' j. dissenting and voting for anirmdnce
for the reasons stated by the fefereeD Set
tie order on notice.
In the matter Of the application Of the
City OF New York relative to acquiring title
to Benson avenue, &c. Charles Van ripper.
! appellant order affirmed, with $40 cos 5
and disbursements No opinion. order fled.
Louise EMS as eNeeutriN, Sc, appellant,
! vs. Hawley Chapman, respondent order
ahirmed. with $40 costs aud disbursements.
Opinions by lnrrahem. P. j. and Iaughiin.
| j. tLaughiin. j.. dlssentingb order filed.
order reversed, with, $40, costs and, dis,
| schik vs. Holbrook Cabot & Rollins corp.
a" Hum g SuI FPa ii: E, al 2Fd appellants siSa
seaboard Trading Co, Respondent order
modified affirmed without costs opinion by
Laugh'ln, J. CLARKE. J.. taking no partD
Evelyn de Cordova as executriS. respon-
ddGans vs. ,ArtnuL Sanyille' anPe, liant.
to defendant to withitaw demurrer and to
answer on payment Of costs Opinions by
scoiit d. and lsnggrahaim, J, Insr2aam
Riviera Realty Co, respondent, vs. nm;
order. reversed, new trial ordered. costs to
sSdt5 powliHs and HocSkhi., - TJP' !po%ins
=. dissenting. and Hotchkiss J.. dissenting
| In part) Settle order on notice
Ida X. whipple, appellant, vs. Prudential
Insurance Company Of america. respondent
ion; fseo;t and Hotchklss. ~. dissentlngl
:, Harlan D Morgan. respondent. Y; Bon
reversed. with costs, and complain as
P''fa n MN foi opinions ag RnFE-anag
dissenting Clarke. J. taking no part.
The Canadian Agency. .Lti. respondent
" Frank G. webster, ct a.. impletfe s..
S HFS .1ts 5Oa d:.nan, T% 70 Sh 0'
oF 4Rs c by R2H' Gr!acJ oFfsF 4
vs. Assets Realization COMPANY, implicated
ana disbursements. with leave 10 defendau,
to withdraw demurrer and to answer on
payment Of costs. opinion per curtain. Or
THEODORE N's'srak as ssaw}ini''ra,oT re-
I 80. opinion order nlcd
Adot Melman. respondent Ne. Babcock
Wilcsx Company. appellant judgment
and order reversed and new trla, ordered.
hs sroGni tba, III. eviSncs to zoe. nor not ,
tain the nniing mat the defendant was neg.
Torrenre N Bl-trett respondent. y.
Erie Railroad companr app. ant Ju9r.
opinion. Clarke. J.. dissenting order
Riverside" Contracting Ccmpanv app.usr,
| Fret National Rank % Bayoune r,spon-
4ssss' SINE S2,'h Trssn'' Gsm. TSSeiysr same
Charles " wright V The same IuIr-
Dissenting memoranium by Laugh'in Jr
LevsrnF Gar-igues COMPANY re,pon-
| ether. ,appe!',n. judgment mo l,nei as
h
! I'm J Sgttie. order on note
E ca rs.pana cSt 2Ge- sr-m.i hs WS
so costs and disbursements Win leave 20
ppn S,Gn to amGni O. g1{,me1r Of Sost, No
De Brauwere y ne RrAuwcrcI ,.O3 y Y.
Louis n wss,s-s'rom. appellant, y.
in opinion 10 pan'in. appellant Ia a. courts.
S Ss}' 70 Psn'in n al .@sT,s
wisn.r, II Martin, appellant v city Of
TttH YORK rs:Ponnad;Crn,,. J9.tEmen; affirmed.
VIZ" N, fiS sG,e,S %pC9 omran H' -o.p nef y
LecNy & Rurn Inc. appellant .JuiEmcn,
snt order affirmed, with costs No opinion.
The People. S. resgog,!eng, ", lanes
The People, 8. r,.poude9' y, N'rei
sppeGant Judgment aH-mei ~ opinion
.ENN'Ey y, G'iuI'Ps;r. srFs 'r' ,r.rl~'.
arrsNa.r' Jadsme1. .ro,.r.. r.N .r,,
ordered costs 10 Ne fHnttrt go aH |. oven.
unless p!aiutn s;!pu.afrs 30 fe...r .a-
| verdict TO sum OF So. .u NH y event the
! judgment A. 80 reduced Il affirmed. W. %
! costs 81 appeal TO defendant lppc' ant
| tSee Gardintr - g. 4 II Il x
! Co col y. y 80 S"'''' order on notice
Tn" People eN rrl. " .'tm ! Ernn
re!u'or, vs. Rudolph T. " er ~ supcr.r
i'udenl ~, respondent order and ~
mcni reversed with costs. tni Judgment
ordered Tor re.a'o~ - directed IN rpuIou
oP'nt9,g pr CUBAN. Sat..e co.. .,r IN. u,.l.e
I1siie W. ltrl,.. cas- aIm.H.s.ratot re-
sp'nte't, ~ y u y n Il 60
, appellant Judgment ana or.rr ~eve~s IS
WIN costs and cGmp.,in, dlsm..sed vim
cos's Opinion by Laugh"n. Settle order
on notice
". Rh!ne.anler Waldo a. 'ommissioner
respondent Writ dismissed and proceed
lnEs affirmed, Win SO .o,'. ana dis
bursemsn,s 10 opinion Or'er h,cd
baltimore Dairy Lunch Company, appel
LIANT, Ns Bo!om,r Lunch Company 81 al
respondents judgment ana ori.r ~ ,rmed,
WIN costs 80 opinion order sled
Z Michael CautWeu a. adWlnistrsior, re
spondent " y g. Ii n. Il r. 60,
appellant Judgm, a. and order affirmed
/ WIN costs 40 opinion order Nod.
tA"Ston CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. a0pe''
! lA"t " Prospect Investing COMPANY, %
al. respondcp'S judgment tnirnci, with
costs No opinion order n'el
| Lena titrou. appellant " N''h1.. NeSi
imp eadet respondent. order ani-mc g.
WIN 40 costs ana dls5ursements. No opln.
Ion. Ordtr nc