Norwich bulletin., 1914-11-14
ALlMoNY MATTERS BEFORE
 SHORT CALENDAR SESSION
Two Wives Seek Money Pending Di- verce-ForeeIosure Judgment in Col chester Case.

1 Vorce-f oreeIoSure Judgment in Col
 chester Case.
 In the superior court short calendar
 session here Friday morning, after argument of motion for alimony pen I dente lite. Judge Curtis took the pa pers in Johanna Paracenti of Nor l wich against John Paracenti of New
 York. and in Ethel May Wells against George F. Wells.
 Wife Tells of Property She Owns. In the Paracenti case, Mrs. Paracen- 1 Ii was witness She lives on Thames street and said she had been mar fied 29 years, but for the past six
 years she and her husband have not l lived together She said they were
 married in New Jersey. To Attorney ] R. M. Douglass Mrs. Paracenti said she lives in house that cost $2,OO0 I but is mortgaged for $500. An old man
 whom she had taken care of for 20
 months left her $1,400 when he died and she had also had his life insured MT. Paracenti also admitted that she has a big house near the one she lives in, but she claimed paid most of the
 money for the house from what she received when her two boys were at | work. She claimed she owes S1, 400 in debts. There is 8 mortgage on the
 now house for $2,1G0 and it may be worth s4,0o0. Mrs. Paracenti said she has two boarders. There are attach
 
 New York parties for debts of Mir. Paracenti.
 Attorney Shields called John Par lacenti to the stand. The witness said
 he is now in New York and is en-
 gagged, with the help of friends, in
 making imitation marble goods and has about TOO pieces on hand. But business is poor and when he was with a New York firm he had made ! from 70 cents to $7 per week. -I-r,
 said he had no property, but he had conveyed all to his wife. He told of his agreement to buy a building in
 the Catskills on the instaIlment plan
 on which he hae made a. few pay
 ments but he does not know what has become of the building. Charges Husband with Cruelty. In the alimony case of Ethel May Wells of New London against George ] F. Wells of Groton, who is employed | In the engine plant at Groton at $15 per week, Mrs Wells testified that they were married in 1910 and have
 no children. She told Attorney Nor
 gan that she left her husband twice l and she claimed he acted in a cruel and unnatural manner. She is living with her folks in New London and they formerly lived in Groton. The young wife asserted that her husband did not support her and her folks had to give her spending money. To Mir. Burrows the wife said sine was not we'll when she married. She ] was just over the whooping cough and had relapse after her wedding The lawyer brought out the fact that she was accused of adultery in her hus- bands divorce action.
 Charles E. Guile of New London,
 father of Mrs. Wells, said the latter
 came home in poor health and he had
 to support her. He formerly lived in Groton. Oscar O. Long is a boarder and there are three other boarders in the Guile home. Long lives apart from his wife.
 MT. Burrows tried to show Long
 went around with Mrs. Wells but it was ruled out Judgment in Colchester Cases. Judgment for $1,25427 was given in Samuel Levin of Colchester against
 Benjamin and Frieda Shnulewitz of Colchester on the plaintiffs suit on a.
 note for $l,5o0, given by the defend
 ants on January f, 1910 to Isadore
 RossinofH and assigned by him to Levin. In another case between the same Iitigants, foreclosure Judgment in the sum of $1,SS3.39 was also given on a note for $1.700 secured by mort gage on a farm in Westchester in the town of Colchester. The defendants put in 8. claim of having made pay
 ments of $i,o24 on account of the two notes. They claimed that they bought l1t6 15ldOT 1eOSS4IIOIl Ol January 4 1910 for $S,200, paying $500 in cash, giving a mortgage for $1.500 and assuming a mortgage al-
 ready on the property. The amount of the two mortgages on January 4 1910, the defendants claimed, was iS2,700. The first Monday in March. 1915, was set by the, court as the limit
 for redemption in the foreclosure judg- ment.
 ForeeInsure on Boswell Avenue. Judgment by stipulation in the sum of $649.19 was giYerB in the case of
 Hadley Potter of Montville against
 Wlodysiow Krupinsh of Norwich, H. Blackledge & Co.,, and Joseph Zabo- rowsii with Jan. 1st 1915 as the first date of redemption and a week later for each Of the other defendants. The
 suit was brought on note and mort gage for $665 on land on Boswell ave- nue. H. BlackIedge & Go. claimed a
 debt of $400 against the property.
 An extension of one week was al- lowed in Alexander E. Fournier vs.
 Herbert B. Draper and others, and in
 Mary B. Chapman ys- Christopher B. Chapman.
 Motion to open default was granted In Louise J. Boss against Charles Royce Boss and others.
 Cases Assigned.
 Assignments for trial before Judge
 Howard J. Curtis 'in this city were made as follows:
 Tuesday, Nov. 17th. Wilfred F.
 Brown vs John F. Hart, Trustee.
 ,WedneEday Nov 18th Zebulon R