The Calumet news. [volume] (Calumet, Mich.) 1907-1938, 1914-02-14

I Cnp.t,,aI e.. r.. n
S--- : :. > : aso.
then had ,,,., o., 81. nj. 20.
,-o,,t.,, a.. ....
~ '''''
re 'ooA ms "Ncrcoat IN the middi
W. N"7"s'' ne SAID ne had beef
'''''N''s ''et earlier IN the day be
,'"He 1t was not Gentlemen OF th'
jury WIS" you "ouI' Keep I'm min'
''''', Wv '''''N nave o''p ana spacious
I.", Nets
''''''' ring 10 tne searching of th'
H'"Se' after the smoothing Mr. Watson
H"HS 'l'l "'S zone ."n "a search war
rant ''"l IL would take more than
] " S'"''" warrant L" iiu1 gun i'm thai
''""S' ''''r '.il'u J"3n Stmach had
D'''' '''I the premises
nc ''I'rr'" /" Silin'o ANA tho rake
''''l ''" p''h mentioned in the tcsti-
'''"uS' >'iIil'' testimony was that he
nav" "h'N picked az the rak" 9" put 80
'N'''' 'l'"' nc might close ia" door.
f't S"ld Mr.. Watson, "Dcfoudau,
james says h' took the r'k" d"ay from
N''i'''' an" the Peopl" ar" very anN-
Gus 20 nave E"u oeIieN" Defendant
james.
ne respondents hay" taken tho
''"''" III 'i'If own pehaIi, Went ON the
-''"''' Tor the defense. You must
treat lh'r testimony by the Same
S'''''"I'S us YOU Test ether WttnessCs,
ie'i'''''D'rihS ais" lh7t the Wosump-
''H OIL 'hho',h'" is with them. There
are '',ie''ncos an the language quoted
vi INC" stories there are dilIerents in|
uc'i'lls ANA would not believe thoI
S'''''S Dor" inc 'arm'rhs OF truth ir|
,"'S were not So Defendant James
u''''S from me others IN that no
'''''NS ''"pef Hi'o the iIst SHOT H.
- not - HShihs man ana did not show
amy particular Hsh'in@ spiril I'm this
instance i"t ne SlN cooper mt with
1t ''u' an" nc jumped TO ms assist
'"'e' IL it not POSSIBLE that in that
'A'''ein'"' ne might not have heard
ct si''I "I'' 't the came Instance
MI watson u're'l"d somewhat |
, '''eh' ;''''N at prosecuting Attorney
Luy"s' implying inal Mr.. Lucas was
manning 1t more powerful 'II"ii to con-
l''I 'ne W ''ueh n'rn 'umong the
n'r uFlehd'nls than the local deputies.
! '"'"'hsnorhe ana James He referred
1" the prosecutor production OF " |
statement made by HE men immc-
'I't'ly after the shooting, the next
cay. The defendants had denied tho
accuracy OF the statement Mr.. Wat
son asked Why has not the rrosecu-
zion produced lie man who took those
notes ~
He chara"tcrzedd rlr. Lucas refer
ance 90 "WaddcIi gunner in his ar
sumcut, as piece cd cheap insinua-
ton, whlc hshowcd the prosecutors
bias ag inst three of the defendants
when the duty OF the prosecution was
.o regard these men IN the same light.
whether they were "Ny"ddell gunner"
,r mcmbers Of the Y. NJ. G. A.
This is not the case Of Anthony In
.as. prosecuting attorney of Uougb-
ION r,rrty against Waddeu punmen."
lo thuudered. III is the case Of IN,
lcgpI, against five of their number"
Ar ly,f...,. .I,......I ,.,.,,,,,,,,.,,, 49,.
1.ao o,eroeI, ,fro,. ,, ox,r,,lo Of ror.
.nyfr orgtory seldom .ur,lIed =, rho
fun.h,ou county .,u,.t borso 10 drew,
beautiful picture ,r iib.rt, or tho
.vruI responsibility resting %, rho
mr.. mon I'm da-f5iro - ..,., o, ,,.,f,,,
he Hherr. Of five r,.p. dep,pd.
pre,cdine his per,r,tiop H.. hal do
urln,d the s,rfi,o condition opt =
hitch grew This trapadv Ito doscri,cd
his as am absoIuto bre,l,ino DIV, or
oyprumeptr H.. described tho ,ocos.
iJ, off bringing eaIdia,y T., rroto.,
Fnporfv and rrce.,.,. r,,.. ,rl ,,lo,.
MAJ how those t.rora.rt., ,roro ,c,,,,c
20 .tia.oseo,.y az ri,, ,,ilf,,r,. Ia r,,,
INV ~. oopta,..I.l ,,,.,, .. No., -, a.,
Va. Of Jraupbt,r .,,,,.,,,.. .,.,i,,,. -,
lD,J Guard ..,i.,.. .,,.,l. ,,.,,,, 49,. i.o