The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1914-01-17
APPELLATE COURT DECISIONS.
Complete List Handed Down by
First Department Division Yesterday

The following decisions were handed
down yesterday 10y the Appellate Division,
First Department
Theodore W. Letter. respondent IS Theresa
4, Oelrichs and another. implicated. appel
With SO costs and dlsburse ments No opln.
Mabel l.. Towlc. respondent, Theresa
a oelrichs an! another appsll9,nts Order
People ex rel Hyman unner, respondent
lsuts. order affirmed with $40 costs ana
disbursements No opinion. order Med.
New YORK. central 4 Hudson river Rail
road Company. respondent, vs. II. u.
Sinner a Co, appellant order affirmed
with $40 costs and disbursements No opin-
ion. order filed.
Central Railroad Company 81 New Jersey.
responder. Ss. II. -. sinner a Co. appel
lanis order affirmed with $40 costs and
disbursement No opinion. order hlsd
1910 lirg ddway Corporation, appellant. vs.
George Rector Inc. respondent order A.
opinion per curlam. order flcd
People eN rel Il 7 subway Construction
COMPANY. respondent vs.. Alfred craven, as
chief engineer. 80, appellant; order AZ
iirmed with SO costs and disbursements. No
opinion. order hled
BeatNcc o'connor. appellant, " An
thony Il, Werneke. respondent. order AZ
/ hrmed with $40 costs and disbursements. No
I opinion. order tled.
| barnett l.. Hollander and another re-
spondents, rs. Henry kaufman ct al, appel
lants. order affirmed with so costs and
dis bursements No opinion. order fled
Randolph Blune, responder vs. Carl y
| Moller appellant order affirmed with $40
costs and disbursements No opinion order
Emele l.. Brunn, respondent. vs.. Lincoln
Bruun appellant order affirmed with $40
costs and disbursement No opinion.
order fled.
Walton =. Carpenter, respondent. vs. Mil
/ dred a. Carpenter. appellant. order re-
versed with SO costs aud disbursements and
motion gran.ed TO the extent stated IN order
| Elizabeth RuStpttpr
| spondents vs. John c Hocninger a. eNecu-
tor 1na %,S Seh sa.,s nd pEsnn
ments. No opinion. order nled.
Edward stafford: plaintiff, v. Mary
Annie +. stafford. individually and as nd
mnis,ra,r.x Order affirmed with $40 costs
Gregory Potaros VS. Fifth Avenue Building
| Company Motion 20 dismiss appeal granted
with $40 costs, Order filed
granted w,h SO costs Order iied "'''''
pleaded &C. Motion to dismiss appeal q" denied lie"
without costs Order hled ,.,,.- .,
denied without costs Order filed
People OK rel, John W McGloln VS., Patrol:
New York Motion to dismiss appeal granted
| with $40 costs unless appellant complies with
Mses s'S Wo organ James oraoI Mac ii Motion
dismiss appeal granted with so costs Order
George T Hancock VI. Hartford Fire In.ur.
sncc Company. Motion TO dismiss appeal
granted with SO costs Order filed
| ceased. Motion to dismiss appeal granted with
$40 cost. Order filed -
pleaded, &c Motion TO dismiss appeal sran,cd
| without costs Order filed
Makrs no Local No. c'e s and sT
TO dismiss appeal granted with $40 costs.
The People. &c. VS. Juliu. orbach. Motion
TO dismiss appeal granted Order iiled.
The People, &c, vs.. Charles Tort. Motion
TO dismiss appeal granted unless appellant
comply with terms stated in order. Order
RaHaele Auriemmo VS. Aimone Manufac,
turing Company, Motion TO dismiss appeal
granted with so costs unless appellant com,
In The matter OF Hudson Hoasland. deceased
| Motions denied with SO costs, Orders filed
M smSe snW'ns hsr Snr' sn,ro,.
implended, &c Motion denied with $40 costs
American ,woolen Company of New yorl,
vs. Harry Moskowitz Ct al Motion denied
~ R,,u $40 costs 9s.,, Order Med
ion Company. Motion denied with $40 costs
William L. Gallagher vs.. Roya, Mail Steam
Packet Company Motion denied with SO costs
Jos'ph,n ",, D. Sell ": Pres. Publishing Com
SIS "0"'" 'eA''" with ''0 costs. Order
Rosa Baynard as Adm., vs., Pi,isburs Con
costs Order filed WI" '''
The People, Sc. VS. LOUIS Markheim Time
to file printed papers on appeal extended 10
Jan g. 1914. ~
John u. Gray Va Justine s. GRAY Motion
Tor stay denied with $40 costs unless appellant
comply with terms stated in memorandum
per curiam, Settle order on notice
John Miksan VS.. Robe g. Brother Mo,,or
granted without costs Settle order on noiice
Mary r., sullivan vs. n Y. Telephone Com
6any impld, Sc Motion denied with $40 costs
Daniel woodcOck We Arthur j. TAYLOR
tnpld, &c. See memorandum per curtain.