American Falls press. [volume] (American Falls, Idaho) 1907-1937, 1914-10-29
!. What was his first name?

"hhh "ao hto niot ndilts
A. ! will think of 1t in a minute,
know him. Well, for a nickname
they called him "Toughy."
q. What does he do?
A. He did work at links barn.
do not know where he is now, or what
bhe is Going. He worked at different
places.
Q. What sort of a looking fellow
is he?
A. He is a young fellow, ! know him
when ! see him. He IL 22 or %.
Q. Who else, II anyone's names do
you know?
A. Well, Joe mentioned This black
mustached fellow | just described.
q Who else?
A.. ! do not know If / remember the
other names, / know he mentioned a
good long list of them
q. And that is the only names you
can recall out OF the fifteen or sixteen?
A. Yes sir.
q. DO you know of your own
knowledge whether or not any OF these
men whose names you have mentioned
have beer selling whiskey or intoxi-
eating liquors?
A. No. / do not.
q. You have not sufficient infor-
nation about the violations to Justify
you In swearing to a warrant for ar
rest?
A. No.
Q. And you would not do SO?
A. No.
; Y. DO you know anything else con-
corning alleged violations OF LIQUOR
law In the county OF Power? Either
at R~ockland, American Falls or any
outlying sections?
A. Well. not only talk. / stayed all
night at Rocks Wednesday night, | be-
lieve-Henry Rocks, and Russell lust
mentioned there had been a big quaint
ity of whiskey sold at the dance over
there Saturday night.
q. He advised you who sold that
intoxicating liquor?
A. No. he did not say whether IT
was hearsay or not.
q All you know is just what other
people have told you?
A. Yes.
q. You have never taken Il upon
Yourself to make Investigations after
being advised as to these statements?
A. No sir.
q. Do you feel that there are facts
sufficfent. Mr.. Clark, upon which to
base a statement that there are viola
tors of Intoxicating liquor laws with
In the county OF Power?
A. Yes sir. | should think so. II
somebody rushe down the street and
tells me the Remington Hotel is aire.
l would not have any reason to dis
credit II unless ! had investigated Il.
" you would not make the state
ment that the Remington Hotel was
afire several weeks thereafter without
knowing 1t was true or false. would
you?
A. III j had not heard anything 10
the contrary n did not know any
Inherent. but In that case, I would
have heard.
w. In other words, you would have
taken It upon yourself to find out.
Mr.. Clark? "
A. Yes. very likely.
q. Under the law, Mr.. Clark apv
party testifying, his evidence must
'e"Nu W hinn, dnu III ne has DrO-
duced sufficient evidence, his evidence
IL attached to n complaint and the
Is verified by the Prosecuting
on information and belief
Now do you believe any OF your evil
dence is sufficient to justify that tort
complaint being issued?
A. No, as ! told you before. Il ia
lust rumors. | have not paid much
attention.
q. Then as a matter Of fact. Won
would not desire any complaint 10 he
against any party on informa-
lion n belief. based on your evil
dence this morning?
A No.
o. VIII you take IL on yourself ~
you are advised further as to these AL !
violations to report same to the
court or to my office?
A. Yes.
u Which you should do as a citi-
Zen, should you not?
A. Yes sir.