Norwich bulletin., 1914-12-05

In the superior court here on Friday at the short calendar session the fol- lowing cases were assigned, Judge M. A. shumway presiding:
 Court Assignment. At Norwich; Monday. Dec. z, at 1 P; m.-F'enton ct al vs. >Fenten Building Co. hearing on application for disso- lution of liens. s.'
 Jury Assignments.
 Tuesday, Dec. S-York vs. York, exr... Hooper ct al vs. Connecticut Co. ct al, Shanbach vs. Sum.
 Wednesday. Dec. 9--Andrea vs. N. r., N. H. 6 H. R. R. Go, Church vs. Will Hams, Murphy vs. N. r, N. H. 6 H. R. F. Co.
 Thursday, Dec. io-New England dall vs- N. r. N. H. & H R. l.. CoL. Balestrini vs city of New London.
 Friday, Dec. 11-Short calendar, bar meeting and assignment of eases.
 Tuesday. Dec. IS (speciaD-Gorton ct al ys. Smith, ct ux, Clews vs. Doane,
 Tuesday, Dec. p tspeeiaD-Man- waring vs. Gallup, adur., appeal from probate.
 Motion List. The matters on the motion list were
 
 of court, when these matters were dis posed of:
 Demurrer was argued in Norwich Industrial Improvement Co. vs. Fenton Building Co. and others, which is an action arising through the subscription of $759 made to the Industrial corpora ton by the Fenton Building Co, whose name on the subscription list was signed by James F. Fenton, president and treasurer of the Fenton company. A T r7sa1 %rl,r the plaintiff and Attorney c. V. James for the defendant Judge Shumway l took the papers.
 The judge also took the papers after the argument of demurrer in Michael Serreto Vs Charles H. Schwarner and | others. Attorney D. M. Cronin for the defendant and Attorney Lee Roy Rob- l bins for the plaintiff made the argu- l ments- It is a suit over the convey ance of real estate In New London from Schwarner to Serreto in which Serreto claims that he was induced by false statements to accept certain se- 1 curity for S4.o0O which. he alleges, is worthless.
 Answer in two weeks was ordered in Hyman Bialstock vs. Jacob Kirman. 4 demurrer was argued in Frank Nofner vs. Simon Siegelwaks, the judge 1 taking the papers The attorneys were Brown and Perkins for plaintiff, J. J. Desmond for defendant.
 Argument oS demurrer went over ir William Rowan Eccles vs. Rhode Isl i and Hospital Trust Co, executor. ar appeal from the probate of the will oi the late John Eccles of. this city. Argument of motion to expurge was made in the divorce suit of Arnidast Lusijnan vs. Della Lusijnan of Mont vile. Attorney John H. Barnes repre- sented the plaintiff and Clayton B Smith for the defendant The plain. l tiff and defendant were married or I June 26. 1905. and the grounds or which the divorce suit is brought arS l adultery. The default was opened by agree. ment in Alexander F. Fournier vs Herbert E. Draper and others. s 1s1 Motion to set aside aon-suit wal l granted in Mary 5. Chapman ys | Christopher B. Chapman and answer was ordered in two weeks.
 Pleadings in two weeks were ordeFeG I in Isaac Sherman vs. Joslin-Lena Go. motion for non-suit for failure tt plead. e Matters that were postponed wer, Jeremiah Sullivan and others ,Vs. Ray rnond J. Jodoin, motion t6 return cas- to docket, and Lottie D. Wilson xs Maurice -1A. Wilson. motion for aIinons pendente lite. and William L. Main vs