The Mankato free press. [volume] (Mankato, Blue Earth County, Minn.) 1879-1924, 1914-06-05
Stories Briefly Told
Change Of Venue
Asked By Brecht
From Tuesdays Dairy.

out of the kidnapping affair that took
place at Minnesota Lake last Febru-
airy are to be tried I'm Blue Earth
or Faribault county viii be the point
ut issue In an argument that will
take place before Judge A. X. Pau
of the district court next Friday aft
crnoon at two o'clock.
These are the suits of Frank Lau-
risch against Rev. John Helper and
Anna Laurisch against William
Brecht and Anna Laurisch. In each
of these suits the plaintiff asks dam
ages in the sum of $4,000 on ac-
count of the kidnapping OF his son.
{. ]. Laurisch. attorney for the
plaintiff, after the preliminary call
of the calendar this morning, asked
that the two cases be added to the
calendar. Putnam & Carlson OF Blue
Earth, attorneys for Father Helper
and William Brecht, objected to this,
stating that the venue had been
charged to Faribault county. as their
clients, these two defendants, lived
in that county. Mr.. Laurisch said the
defendant, Anna Laurisch, I'm each
case, had not asked for the change
Of venue. and there fore no change
of venue could be granted. To this
the reply was made that Anna Lau-
risch could not be found.
Jury Cases Set For Trial.
The jury cases set for trial this
morning were as follows:
National Bank of Commerce VS.. ].
II. Lloyd.
Hubbard Milling company VS.. L.
]. Grover and Atwood Stone com.
pany.
Village of Madison Lake VS.. Johi
Keogh, A. J. Rost and Luke Keogh
John Fensenmaier VS.. Daniel l..
Williams.
Henry l.. Leonard VS.. o. A. Thro
and Emma Thro.
Olney J. Dean & Co, VS.. Otto
Neitge.
Harold Johnson VS.. Zuel-wood-G ofr
company.
In the matter of the estate OF Eli
jah J. Mycue. deceased, Rose Ford,
appellant, VS.. Thomas Hughes, re-
spOndent.
w. A. Bedbury vs.. Bert Stratton.
Carl L. Hanson vs.. Dan Williams.
Ulrika Hanson vs.. Dan Williams
Barbara Hoffman VS.. City of Man
kato. ''
Clark d. Jones VS.. City of Man
kato.
Corliss Jones VS.. City OF Mankato.
Oma l.. Walker VS.. j. s. Hol-
brook.
Otto Peterson VS.. William II.
Matzke.
Thomas Rooney vs. Chicago and
North Western Railway company.
G. w. Allyn and II. @. Allyn VS..
Ford Motor company.
+. ]. Bracht VS.. Z. +. Kobe.
F.. J. Bracht VS.. Joseph Kreuer.
J. II. Allen & Co., VS.. NJ. Radke
Mercantile company, and Albert Ur-
ban.
Henry E. Brand VS.. NJ. F. sulli.
van.
stephen II. Baxter VS.. Ira Bishop
and Jennie Bishop. his wife.
N. !. Batcheller VS.. Joseph o.
Christ. ..r
Frank Laurisch VS.. Kate McArdle.
Mabel w. Adams VS.. City, of Man
kato, ]. b. Nielsen and Gust Frank.
August Paegel VS.. William Eng.
lerth.,
n. NJ. Hermanson vs. Chicago, st.
Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha Rail.
way company.
Russell Burrill VS.. Mankato Elec-
trio Traction company.
John Z. Burke VS.. Ezra A. Cooper.
George Voss VS.. III. Glenn Allyn
and George w. Allyn as Mankato
Auto company.
Matthias Nostdal VS.. w. ]. Morehart
and George Atchison,
Annie Z. Leo, Administrative of the
estate of Carl Leo. deceased, VS..
James Mcclure and Benjamin Hoff.
man.
Anton Randig VS.. City OF Mankato.
Elizabeth Fallenstein VS.. DR.. ].
w. Andrews.
In the matter of the estate of
James Hendley. deceased; appeal OF
Florence De Laughter.
Harvey c. Young vs. Laura Nelson
ct al. sT NF
Swan L. Johnson VS.. The widell
company.
In the matter OF the estate OF
Hebron Olson, deceased. appeal of
Mrs. Jack Buoy VS.. Carl Strom.
executor.
First International Bank OF Portal,
n. d., VS.. ID. J.. Brown and Edgar
Zimmerman. Jr.
Cases Continued.
Cases were continued as follows:
James Matthews VS.. A. ]. Rush.
]. w. Kuebler and II. II. Schwartz.
Political Announcement.