Milford chronicle., 1914-01-30
PRIMARY LAW IN
KENT AND SUSSEX

In vizw of the discussiou over tie
Primary Escuoa law passed az Lsst
. years session Of TIE Legislature. sxten-
l-g the NeE Czs-.e as 20 Kent ard
I SUSSEX co1tes. Thomas r Bsyari ard
Eilund Mi--hel. chair-en. respect
ive-y. of the Democratic ard Republican
state Cc--5rrses. addressed a eo-zu-
F 1icalon Co Governor u er. suggesting
T thar he request the opinions of the Cnzn- .
seLor ard izi-=s touching the primary
7 e-scuols % Il aeid il Kent ard Sussex 4
Z counties this year. iz accordance with .
chapter S5 Fol--e - and chapter -.
F1--Ee - LaE-s q Delaware. tne sane F.
Beng q relation rC the FriE-zry Lection
az q NsT Caste county. b vlrt1s
q chapter Is. f1.UUs 2. Laws q Ds.s-
wa-5- l-s sad New Castle County Pm
Ezry -aw was sTrsnd=1 % Kent and
SUSSEX counties Ire question raised
was whether or roE- IN applying r1e 1rst
tao mentioned acts the words Kent
ard SUSSEX as the case ray Be- sn1ulc
Be read lcrc TIE NeW Castle county acts.
wlere the wo11 New Castle" 0ccurs.
Il vas further suggested rhar the gov
sruor Inquire cf the Chancellor and
judges touching the matter Of the pu5li-
cation CT the notice of the primary elsc-
ton required q section q chapter ss3. :
Volume d
Tie governor. IN his letrsrto the Chan
-elor ard Judges. requesting their opil- E
lcn 1 writing. touching the proper IL d
-e-prs-a-lcc Of the terms Of SAID chapter :
- so--Le =. says The act 10 gues- 4
-cn merely SAYS that the law chapter +
-. t1-ULe - as amended known A. i
TIE SeE Castle CounTy Primary Election =
~ s1a-- Apply % the Counties 0t Kent 4
.1c SUSSEX Is vel e. New Castle. r
Z 1e question arises % both Kent ard !.
sussex counties ss o. wEs-1sr. when f
ne words New Caste are Used. r-ev =
1cu-d ae understood % mean 'Ee1c' q 3
Sussex. IS the case may bs 10 apply -
"a -- 90 these r7vc co1lties-
AEzi1 I1 secuou 2 Cf c1zuter 2c5 =
DUNE D. there is provision for publ r.
srio1 q c1e OF more daily papers. RI
% Informed. ard I believe it % oe g 8
zeet- thsr there are 10 daily papers pub
--=- II either Kent or sussex counties -a
1e-e are. however. e Elu1er OF Teesly r.
2pers 10 1or1 OF these counties. ard -
'01.c. therefore. ask vo1r opinion zs % n.
neither 1r not 10 would be .eEsl for
1olcarlou 90 be made IL the weekly
apers lu Kent and Sussex counties ard
~ many times IN each Of sad counties
,ch publication should Be made
SHOULD UsE BOTH PAPERS FL.
l1 re r-F ~ 90 the governor. co-l1u-i- E-4
.uQu. the Chancellor and Judges a5- ze-
-essed him letter in Hhic1 they ex- aSs
-ess unanimous opinion Is follows Pas
irsr- hat under the act IN CuesrI1l- o--
aprsr 81. Volume 2. Laws Of Dela- s,1t
sre-wle1 the words EeE Castle -F
g used IN chapter 3s3 Volume p. iVe-
iWs ot Delaware. As amended Or chap 1=t
2 80. Volume -. Laws Of Delaware. the
g should cs understood % mean --=
Ae1- OF Sussex as rEelczse may lara
in applying rhe'4aW 90 those two e !
-1u=s. -cW
A-1 sec1ld-Trat il would da legal u--l
publication 10 b made il the rsls
es-T papers II Kent ard Sussex cou-- 0--
s. bur We think notice Of the tine and F1=
zee be given cy publishing the same plot
e eacn Say for az least rve dzvs oe- was
g the time ~ holding the same IN one trE.
nore daily newspapers printed il Nsw tr-ei
ste county and we are also Of the -l=l
mon, l1 order % carry our the spirit take
the laW. t1at notice should be pub -~-y
.el ll 20 least 11e ueEspauer printed Tr
aent and Sussex county. a. TIE case vii
: 3. az least i've days before the IS i,
& ot holding such primary election. ss--
Charles y. Curtis. Chancellor. s--r
james Pe1neEil. Chief Justice. Ms
William H. Boyce. -s-
Henry C. Conrad.
Victor 3. Woolley.
Herbert L Rice. 49,
Associate Judges. -.