The Leon reporter. (Leon, Iowa) 1887-1930, 1914-10-22
New Court Cases.

Ida L. Edwards VS.. John H. Ed
wards. The parties were married at
Grand River March 8, 1888, and liv-
ed together until August l 1913.
Plaintiff asks for decree OF divorce
on the grounds that her husband has
become an habitual drunkard and
mistreated her SO that She esfcannot
live with him. She also asks that
she be given the care Of their two
minor children, and defendant be re-
strained from going on or about tie
premises where she resides " H.
McGinnis, attorney for plaintiff.
Tootle-C Campbell Dry Goods Co.
VS.. L. Osterkamp. Suit is brought
on an account for $141.45. B. M
Russell, attorney for plaintiff.
Stephen Varga, admr. VS.. Ernest
Elston. Plaintiff as administrator
of the state of Tyra Henderson
brings suit to recover $460.22, which
was paid by Henderson as surety on
notes for the defendant. F. Varga,
attorney for plaintiff.
Stephen Varga, administrator OF
estate of Tyra Henderson vs.. c. O..
Roland and Ernest Elston. Plaintiff
Plaintiff paid notes signed by Hen
derson as surety amounting to $699,
and took an assignment OF a mort
gage on a threshing outfit, and asks
J for judgment for the amount. n.
Varga, attorney for plaintiff.
| Stephen Varga, administrator ot
estate of Tyra Henderson vs.. c. o.
Roland. Plaintiff paid a surety
note for $24.93, and asks for judg-
ment against defendant for this
amount. F. Varga, attorney for
plaintiff. I.
Stephen Varga, administrator of
estate of Tyra Henderson VS.. c. 0.
Roland, Sarah Roland, Ernest Els
ton and Vestie Elston Plaintiff paid
surety note of $1S4.51, and asks
/, for Judgment against the defendants
4 for this amount. F. Varga, attorney
for plaintiff.
] NJ. Shippy vs.. Grace Weable ct al.
Plaintiff asks that he be declared the the
owner of lots and g., blockss2g, b, Ia. Llia1
Emoni, for which he traded 1eaHa
I and other property to S. sShippy Who Who
died before making the deed .AscR.
Olsen, attorney for platntiH
| A. Nilsson VS.. Iva w, ana H o.
/ Boor. Plaintiff purchased "a farm
| from defendants and claims they left
dead hogs on the premises, unknown
Ito him, and as resultsOft such negli-
gence he has lost 35 or 40 hogs and
his hogs are still dying =. He asks for
| damages of $500 for the hogs which
died and 5000 for time spent msre- re
moving dead hogs, renovating build
Iings, etc. w. S. Hedrick, attorney
for plaintiff.
Stephen Varga VS.. James b. and
/ Minnie "A. Albaugh. Suit is brought
on note for $500, dated Sept. 4 Z,
1907. C. w. Hoffman and +. Varga,
attorneys for plaintiff.
Clinton Bridge Co. VS.. Decatur
County. Suit is brought for $4,367
for bridge which the board of sup
ervisors cancelled the order for, but
! the bridge was Shipped and the coun:-
ty refused to pay for it. b. IL Mil
Iler, attorney for plaintiff.
international Harvester Co. vs.. w
Il. Barry. Suit is brought on a note
and account for So, 06O.6O Marion
!, f. Stookey and GEO. Wambach, attor-
.Eneys for plaintiff.
America Cornett VS.. Clark Lewis
.lG. f. Mitchell, Mrs. N. Mitchell and
/. Charles E. Gore. Suit is brought on
a note for $4,000. G. w. Hoffman,
attorney for plaintiff.
/ Estes & Coyington vs.. Q. P. Jami.
|son. Suit is brought on q note foI
I$20O. ". r. Met Ginnis, attorney fol
Ict INT sSts