New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1914-07-26

Professor Delbet refused 70 be sworn
70 tell the whole truth. He asserted he
had been approached as 10 the testi-
mony ne would give. and the person
who saw him had said ne was sent oy
Ne. LGbcri.
In an instant the great advocate was
on his feet IN towering rage, declar-
ing that the person lied. A ylolen,
alteration followed. Ne Labor IN
sisted on the name Of this person being
told. Professor Delbet refused 10 DIS
close il. saying he had promised not 70
reveal u. In the end the professor
was excused from testlfylng, and leIt
the stand without giving the name ara
without ailaying the rage or Me. La
bori ,......,
throughout the surgical discussion
as - the wodnds she inflicted on her
victim Nine. CaIllauX sat croucneu
hack in her chair and seemed not 20
realize what was being sald. " WIS
felt that these grewsome details we're
too much for her. but she showed the
sare p:tiful detection during ner couE-
coVs row with Professor Delbet. Nnen
the court rose and she had 70 return
20 her cell she could not walk unas-
sisted.
The Jury was ordered locked up until
lTordav morning. Il is thought that
the verdict may be reached BY Tuesday
NIGHT or Wednesday morning. Inc
,ace is already practically ended so far
as tho taking Of testimony goes.
A. the Palais dc Justice az the close
of to-dav'e hearing the prevailing opln-
.o,, v,o. that the prospect Of Nine. Call
laux obtaining an acQuittal had grown
yery faint. Il Is thought, however
that she will escape with compare
tivoly light sentcuce-two 20 I'VE years
irprisonment probably. with pos
sibla respite under the first offenders
The trend Of feeling among leading
nen,bers o. the Paris bar IL that the
ic.ters furnish no moral justification
for Nine. Caillaux's act. II IS now be-
Iiaved hat Ne. Labor will argue that
.hase we're not the letters which his
client fenred 20 have published. and
that would appear 10 be a natural con-
clusion from the practically innocent
nature Of the letters except IN so far as
thew showed the moral peridy Of the
ex-minister.
More Thrills to Come.
Blu, the lawyers say that the con-
tention that these are not the dreaded
documents which Calmettc had in his
possession IS Offset by the testimony
NJ ex-Premier Barthou, DR.. Calmette,
the brother. and others, that Calmette
had neither the intention nor the
power 20 publish any Of the famous
private letters and that the only docu-
rrent the publication Of which NJ. Call
laux and his wife had 20 fear was
the Fabre report as 20 the Rochelle
scandal. The publication Of the let
ters in cour. to-day had but increased
the excitement and discussion the
murder and the trial have given rise TO.
And the public are % have more
thrills yct. II is said that Henri Bern
stein. tho noted dramatist, intends 10
write q play based on the intensely
.ragic situations brought OUT with so
much force during the trial. The ru-
NOR has aroused the keenest interest.
VI. Bernstein tonight theoretically
jisavowcd 20 your correspondent that
he had any such intention. Blu the
public here is convinced that some day
IN the near future they will sec this
great tragedy portrayed behind the
footlights. II NOT by w. Bernstein. then
either by Herr Batnilic or Eugene
Prieuy. |. is thought that the dramat-
ic elements IN Nine. Gueydan's unique
struggle against the Overwhelming
combination % circumstance which
closed in on her furnish such a back
bo for great play that one or an
ct r Of the young French dramatists
will not be able TO resist using Il and
profiting by the public interest that
attaches TO H.