New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1914-05-13
District Court
Next Tuesday
Forty Case. Noticed Fo, Triz
Only Sixteen New
Actions.
At Least Four Cases To Be Brough
Before The Grand
Jury.

Court convenes next Tuesday MAJ
18th at IL o'clock a. M At that ting
the grand jury reports for duty. The
petit jury will not meet until the follow
ing day at the same hour. Forty evE
cases have been noticed for trial at
which "a. cases were continued from the
last term. The insurance cases, IA h.
number, will go over the term. If tried
at all, the road appeals will be tried to
gether. Only Is new civil cases are OF
the calendar and it looks now as tho ste
term would be Of short duration unless
the criminal business should amount &c
something. Altho no criminal eases
are pending at this time, four cases await
the action of the grand jury, Martin
Willinger, for carnal abuse; bauise
Hetlinger, perjury; Otto .Schreyu.
assault; William Wenger, assault. Other
matters may however be brought to
the attention of the grand Jury. 'TbE
following cases have been noticed for
trial:
In the matter of Proceedings to enforce
collection of delinquent real estate tsxe
for 1907 in Brown County, Mimi
State of Minnesota VS.. Henry Stein
hauser.
2. Carl Kehms, Plaintiff, VS.. Auguste
Kehms, Defendant.
8. John ]. Schmidt, Joseph J. Schmidt
and Katharine Schrimpf, Plaintiffs, vs..
Anna Schmidt, Henry Schmidt, Wsnzez
Schmidt and Annie Schmidt, his wife
Defendants.
q. Gudman Anderson, Appellant, VS.
The Board of County Commissioners a
Brown County, MINI. Respondent.
5. Hans Ulen, Appellant, VS.. T1H.
Board Of County Commissioners of Brow
County, Mimi, Respondent.
s. Peter T. Ellanson, Appellant VS..
The Board of County Commissioners Of
Brown County, Mimi, Respondent.
Z. Martin Sorbel, Appellant, VS.. The
Board of County Commissioners az
Brown County, Mimi, Respondent
8. Toilet c. Strom, Appellant, VS.. Thu
Board of County Commissioners II
Brown County, Mimi, Respondent
8. Ole Nilsen, Appellant, VS.. Tns
Board Of County Commissioners 90
Brown County, Mimi, Respondent.
10. Robert Olson, Appellant, xs. Ths
Board of County Commissioners ssz
Brown County, Mimi, Respondent.
II. Anton 0. Ouren, Appellant. 4s
The Board Of County Commissioners q
Brown County, Mimi, Respondent.
IL. Minnesota Farmers Mutual II
surance Company, Plaintiff, Tvs. H. &.
Wendt, Defendant
10. Minnesota Farmers Mutual Ia-
surance Company, Plaintiff. VS. Albert
Roggenbuck, Defendant
Ia. Minnesota Farmers Mutual In
| surance Company, Plaintiff, VS. Henry
Winkelmann, Defendant
Is. Minnesota Farmers Mutual HI
surance Company, Plaintiff. VS.. Herman
Zietlow, Defendant.
16. Minnesota Farmers Mutual In
surance Company, Plaintiff, VS.. Harrs
Trautmann, Defendant.
II. Minnesota Farmers Mutual In
surance Company, Plaintiff, VS.. Herman
Wendt, Defendant.
10. Minnesota Farmers Mutual 4s-
surance Company, Plaintiff, VS.. Bernarr
Blomeke, Defendant.
10. Minnesota Farmers Mutual In
surance Company, Plaintiff, VS.. Herman
Kettner, Defendant.
10. Minnesota Farmers Mutual In
surance Company Plaintiff, VS.. George
Sprink, Defendant.
20. Minnesota Farmers Mutual Ii
surance Company, Plaintiff, VS.. Georu
Pautzke, Defendant.
%. Minnesota Farmers Mut,rSl Ia.
surance Company, Plaintiff, US: Carl G.
Arndt, Defendant.
%. Minnesota Farmers M,rtual In.
| = j. :
surance Company, Plaintiff. US. Henry
Luehmann, Defendant.
"a. Minnesota Farmers Mutual fp-
surance Company, Plaintiff, VS.. 4Ens1
Kettner, Defendant.
Is. Minnesota Farmers MutuaL,1 Is
surance Company, Plaintiff, Ms. Paul A,
Arndt, Defendant.
26. William Harris. Plaintiff, ,ss.sA.
Schiller, Defendant.
y. J. G. Feirer, Plantm, VS.. Joseph
Feirer, Defendant.
Continued on Page ~