Norwich bulletin., 1914-11-17
YALE'S ATTACK FULLY
 AS STRONG AS HARVARD'S
Crimson Has Better of Blue in De-
 fense Work and TackIine

Against Princeton, Yale had an of- fence fully as strong as Harvard's and a defence not so good. Yale made three touchdOwns against the Tigers which were one more than Harvard made. There is a fundamental in whict Yale isn't doing as clean work as Harvard, and it is tackling; and ir several fundamentals of defence as well as in having more men who dc their work consistently and in a fin ished way-this applies to the line not the backs-Harvard is ahead oi the Blue.
 However, 9. team with the spirit on offence and the capacity for execut- ing kaleidoscopic manoeuvers, such as Yale was last Saturday, is a. hard one to guess. one of the kind of which there is no telling what it will do The scoring possibilities of both liar ward and Yale make next Saturdays game a still choicer morsel. By the same token, the variegated Yale game on the one side and the deceptiveness and precision of the Harvard opera dons behind the line when the ball is put in play will call for quick diag- nosis by the defenders; and we shall see which better has studied out how to take care of the other
 LeGore's fine bunting against Princeton showed Yale to be strong in that department of kiclnig, but the Yale fullback didn't display anything like the skill at drop kicking of Ma han or the skill at goal kicking of Hardwick. He may do better with his drop kicks if he stands further back. He was about eight yards away at Princeton and an expert who saw him said he was too close.
 Driggs of Princeton stood far back for his punts. He appeared to be quite 12 yards behind his line, and apparently it was the Princeton plan I,s no blocking to let his distance back take care of that. and thus allow the whole line to get down. That decreas- ed the chances of a run back, chances which always threatened because of the admirable handling of punts by the Yale backfeld.
 The game was characterized by pro- ffcfent catching of punts, both sides doing 1t. Yale to a greater degree than Princeton, but both contributing to handling of kicks, which was in mark ed contrast to the grounding of punts which took place in the Harvard Princeton clash. The judgment of the Yale men who were back there for fly balls was like that of base ball player, and the versatile LeGore's s diamond expertness also was seen in his throwing. There was a baseball touch to his way of whipping the forward pass. The analogy will serve,
 
 cannot be attained with the well known probate spheroid. LeGore drew Q fine finish on one of his two at tenpts to purposely throw a forward pass across the side line. On the oth- CT he hadn't the same accuracy ano threw over the goal line instead of the side line That gave Princeton a touchback instead of compelling her to put the ball in play on the five yard line
 The Yale Princeton game was one that will help to popularize football; 1; popularize it per SC as distinguished from such attraction it has as mere ly college spectacle. We speak purely in regard to the eye filling. The worth -whiIeness of the game, objec- tions to or points in favor of. as to it's basic nature is another matter. The open swirling. all sorts of foot ball by Yale with team play opened out so that individuals stood out in