The Mount Holly news. [volume] (Mount Holly, Burlington Co., N.J.) 1891-1942, 1914-10-20
Court.

OOuie OpChCu Oll 1ucSudy anu Jul
'e Kalisch made his first appearance
l. this circuit. The grand jury was gu;
'f fed and Edward B. Jones, of Northan
e ton, was made foreman. Judge Kalis
a delivered short charge to the jury,
e ferring especially to the charges of nj
s der that would be brought to the ate
t ton of the grand inquest. After spea
n ing on this subject Judge Kalisch sa
d there was another matter which need
s careful attention. 1t was the killing
4 q boy by the driver of an automob
t near Palmyra. The Judge said the fin
' ing Of an indictment depended entire
, upon the evidence showing the mann
e in which the automobile was driven.
there was negligence or carelessness f.;
l indictment for manslaughter should
: found. The jury then retired and Il
: list of cases for trial was called:
NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT.
l. Frances Harvey Albert Adams. AC
ton at law Bleakly & Stockwell. v. Claud
Palmer No answer.
2. Richard J. Harvey Albert Adams
Action at law. Bleakly & Stockwell, " CIaud
; Palmer No answer
8. Arthur j. Piggott VS.. Charles H. Dennis
Action at law. Davis & Davis, Berry & Rig
| gins Ready
A. Philadelphia Life Insurance Company VS.
Harry z. Wagner. Action at law. John D
McMullin, Davis & Davis. Ready.
g. Emma Gill Ellison VS.. The Philadelphia
4 Camden Ferry Co.. a corporation, Lizett
Moore. Action at law. Davis & Davis, Ed
ward L. Katzenbach attorney for Lizette Eur
brugg. J. George Wagner and Lorenzo Moore
6. Emma Gill Ellison vs.. The Philadelphia
q Camden Ferry Co.. corporation, Lizett,
Zurbrugg. J. George Wagner. and Lorenzo
Moore Action at law. Davis & Davis, Gas
kill & Gaskill. attorneys for Philadelphia &
Camden Ferry, CO; Ready.
z Emma Z; Williams VS.. Jennie B. Lining
| and William Lining. Action at law. In
ejectment- Henry H. Savage. v. Claude Pal
mer. Ready.
friend, William S. Fryer and William S. Fryer,
| in his own right Mount Holly Water Com
8an Y.,a corporation Sni Action at law Davis
20, J. D. johnson Company VS.. Jennie w.
Sickles Action at law " Claude Palmer,
| Samuel +. Eldredge Ready.
] 10. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. VS.. William
r. Lehman; ct al, partners. etc Action at
law. Gaskill & Gaskill. Harold B. Wells. No
IL. Matte Beckenbach VS.. Howard Parry,
executor Action at law. John C. Horner,
Grey & A Archer foc Ready ID Hanna. a.o,u
| executrix of the last will and testament of
| Benajah d. Andrews, deceased. Action at
law. Bleakly & Stockwell, French & Richards.
| 10. John B. Nixon Co. vs. Hannah L. An
drews, executrix of the last will and tesla
ment OF Benalah d. Andrews, deceased. Ac-
ton at law. Bleakly & Stockwell French &
Richards. No answer
"a. Joseph D. Hendrickson VS.. Hannah L.
Andrews, executrix of the last will and tesla
ment of Benajah d. Andrews, deceased. Ac-
ton at law. Bleaky & Stockwel French &
Is Ida w Wheatman va Hannah T. An
| drews, executrix of the last will and testament
| of Benajah D. Andrews. deceased Action at
law Bieakly Stockwell. French Rich
l6. George Whitcraft and Elsie Whitcraft,
| his wife VS.. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. Ac-
ton at law. Robert Peacock. Gaskill & Gas
u. William T: Joyce VS.. Pennsylvania
Railroad Co. Action at law. Robert Peacock.
| Gaskill & Gaskill. Ready.
IL. Carrie l.. Haines, ct ais, Excs., of
| Nathan Haines. deceased VS.. William H. Bart
lett. ct al. On contract Gaskill & Gaskill.
| Peter Backes. No answer.
:, 10. Carrie L. Haines.. ct ais. Excs.. of
Nathan Haines. deceased vs.. Wilhelmina A.
Gaskiii. Peter Backes. No answer. ''''''
20. Carrie l.. Haines, ct ais, Excs., of
Nathan Haines, deceased vs.. William H. Bart
81. Carrie L. Haines, ct ais, Excs., of
ais. On contract. Gaskill Gaskill, Peter
Backes. No answer.
22. Carrie L. Haines. ct ais. Excs.. of
Nathan Haines. deceased VS.. John v. Rice, Jr
On contract. Gaskill & Gaskill. Peter Backes
No answer.
e. Carrie L., Haines. ct ais. Excs.. of
Nathan Haines, deceased vs. William III. Bart
lett, ct. ais. On contract. Gaskill & Gaskill,
Peter Backes. No answer.
"a Carrie L. Haines. ct ais. Excs:. of
Nathan Haines, deceased VS.. Charles Mitsch,
ct al On contract. Gaskill g. Gaskill, Peter
20. ]. s. Collins & Son vs. Joseph w.
Brooks and R Conner Reidaman On confroct
Wilfred B. Wolcott, John Boyd Avis, attorney
for Joseph W. Brooks Ready.
Brooks and R. Cooper Beideman. On contract.
Wilfred B. Wolcott; David o. Watkins, at
tog ga i for 4. Cooper Beideman Ready
Action at law. T. ]. Middleton. Joseph Beck
%. Charles H. Singer VS.. Charles Biddle.
Action at law T. j. Middleton, Joseph Beck
Tyler. Ready.
2s. John G. Mueller VS., Delaware River
law. John G. Horner. Gaskill 6 Gaskill,
Charles A. Cogan. Ready.
80. Robert Peacock VS.. Samuel Rainier. On
contract William Harris, William ]. Backes
Ready.
81. Robert Peacock VS.. Harriet Smith. On
contract. William Harris. Ernest Watts.
s2. Robert Peacock VS.. Charles F. Sleeper.
William Harris, Joseph Beck Tyler. Papers
in Justice Kalisch's hands.
S3. F. Victoria Blair VS.. Rebecca Deacon
In tort. E. c. Washington, Charles A. Rigg.
BURLINGTON CIRCUIT COURT
l. Thomas E. French, Samuel X. Robbins,
and George j. Bergen, receivers VS.. Harry
Goodman, trustee for Clarence Goodman. On
bins, George ]. Bergen Robert Peacock. No
answer
2. Thomas E. French, Samuel K Robbins,
and George j. Bergen. receivers Patrick
Cryan. On contract Thomas E. French, Sam
nel X Robbins, George j. Bergen; Robert
Peacock No answer;
Can oil
Doughten. partners. trading as Jackson-Mar-
ion Sales Co Harry C. Wagner. On con-
tract Davis 4 Davis. Robert Peacock, Ready:
4: George Schele VS.. John S.. Collinc and
irving A. Collins. partners, trading j. S.
Collins & Son and Charles Mitsch. In eject
ment. Davis & Davis, v. Claude Palmer.
Ready.
s. John Shinn VS. Samuel Anderson or Isa-
belle Anderson in the alternative. Action at
law. j. H. Hayes, Jr., B. H. White. No
answer.
6. William T. wilkins vs. Charles Crispin.
Action at law. v. Claude Palmer. G. M. Hill
Z. Carrie W. Gelter vs. Frederick thinner
man; Action at law. Claude Palmer. John
8. Andrew ]. szostakowsky VS.. Andrew
Piestrak. In tort Francis j. Smith, Davis
8. Mike Kukla, Adm of valentz Brzbbelak
VS.. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. In tort. Fran
els J. Smith; Gaskill & Gaskill. Ready;
TO- Joseph K. Witzell G. Walsh and
Helen Hylton, Individually. and in the alter
native Helen Hylton, executrix, of John D.
Hylton, deceased. Action at law. Davis &
Davis. William 7. Boyle. attorney of Helen
Hyton individually and executrix. Ready.
IL City of Beverly VS.. Archibald c. Nc
Elroy,. ct al. Action at law. G. Dore Cogs-
well. V. Claude Palmer. Ready.
Y. Virginia w. Brainard VS.. Isadore Has
kell and Catharine L. Lewis. Action at law.
49,. Lillian Virgins VS.. Simon Denbo and
Martha Denbo Action at law. v. Claude
Palmer, Howard Eastwood. Ready.
IA: John O'Leary VS.. Charles Gilbert, bailif.
In Replevin; v. Claude Palmer. Davis &
Davis. Ready.
10. John Wishnisky VS.. Frank Bechot. In
| Ready
I6. Joseph E. Hammell vs. John c. Beatty.
Action at law G. Dore Codgswell, John G.
| II. Jacob Dellinger, adm of the estate of
Laura " Dellinger. deceased vs. j. Boone
Smith, Samuel K. Robbins. Ready.
| lS. Edward l. Quinn VS.. Hannah Quinn.
executrix; Action at law. Robert Peacock.
| 10. James Broadbent, an infant, by his next
| friend, Thomas Broadbent George c. Gum
and Burlington ba Auto S Sale Co. AetSn at
90 Edward Caterall ct al. vs.Arthur d.
| Shields and Abraham M. Austin. Action at
law: Robert Peacock, Davis Davis. Ready.
at law. Robert Peacock, " Claude Palmer.
p. Mary w. Lewis VS.. Watson A. Fort and
Samuel S. Fort Action at law. Harold B.
Wells. Davis & Davis. No answer.
70. Susan Sexton VS.. Lew Grant. On con-
tract. Harold B. Wells, b. H. White. OFF.
"a. Charles Robinson vs.. George Grooby, et
al. Action at law. o. P. Dewitt, H. H
Voorhees,. No answer.
20. Enoch DeWorth, adm, &c. VS.. William
H. Ships. In tort. Robert Peacock. John A
Montgomery. Ready.
&c. Elwood Mount vs. August Hotter. Ac
ton at law. S. A Atkinson. Davis & Davis
| OFF.
Il %. American Optical Co. vs.. STANDARD
Combed Thread Co. Action at law. Howard
| Eastwood, Francis j. Smith. Ready.
%. William A. Cortright. ct ais, trustees
&c. Andrew Haneman, ct al. Action a
law. G. M. Hillman, B. M Rigg. Ready.
| 20. Schwarzschild & Sulzberger VS.. Charlie
II.iiS. - L.: - !.