Corpus Christi caller and daily herald. [volume] (Corpus Christi, Tex.) 1911-1917, 1914-01-30
DUVAL COUNTY

cents an hr too Valuation fo, fht
7 frnsrai road SOD bridge FUND ~
.ania aa ihl 1900 falmfiHn fDf Frn
.fsI .aunhDua. and iail fond
Tha pmmNna aiisFe uo ifff Of
. thr ias M sp .eha nn tno 900 taifa
unu f.f "a ..aHh.usr ani au fu'
. absolutely .ad lnd in lInnu.n H
hr ta1uf naver .f tn, alunt DUm
mt4innria uf uHIn .uuniB SOD ~ nH
$50 .unN because ihr r|d cas- 500
nni htIrd Goo the pHfpHaH 90 .rFai'nl
euihne.e Hnd mi fnr the rrar igl3
sl0h as b. contemplated uy thr ennetl
,uflon ani laws 10 This state bot &C.,
ihe contrary sufh tntes were iefi"h
f.r tbf pnIls.ae nf suppIwneniinE aih
sr funds ind tho rinas fnf souns'
revenue purposes Hi'd 100. fund iof
oad and bfldfo purposes for which
funds. on tbe sbms daie the ttse.
eorr levied 10 ihe fili nmu permt'ra
hy hw
rhe polNnnsiH fHrihss aver th1t tn.
.nld n,sea wore lr. led TO- Tho purpose
lf atnldinH mo 0Hhetiiaiinnai linI
siprod uf-n tho Cas- laNer ~ thf
ounif commissioners count in order
iD collect from che prnniiffs under
risc ~ iess, asiivng ihr taxes ir
.,ersa 20 ihe amount rertultici by low
ID ho collected
Tho plaintiffs sfi that M tne Deb
tssg ieif term nf pu,h eounu
Ommlssloncrr ,enrt me rnnrt ietieh
al pd ,alofom ths 81 u cent" on oa't
400 Valuation fu county rnfvuue par
pnses DO cents un ihe 600 taluatl0r
flr thr rORd and bridge FUND 10 crntr
.n ihr 500 samafieo nv ihe copri
,ounr asa iaii nnni ana mo astenlsb
lns aiirsauou ln mtdr. ihhi thv cnuri
Transferred several ihoasand dollars nf
hs latter fand 90 ihp road 1nd hriAE,
'und rh, allegation s made ibut n
IuAngs lodeor has nren kept hy thl
county siuco 1874
Tho plaintfta further ailrrc thHi fhi
inns 81 i9if rupori ~ 'hc cenni
treasurer ailoN ~ me following
amounts reviewed ana appllri
ro nnHd ana luldgs fand tCaaf
O. coun aouse and lhtl fund AVA
NuiWlihstanllnE gre tac, ihhi h'
aour, huuso snd iail Tax Was 20 cenu
ma tho roAd and bssdsr i,, was 81
ients that ths disparity n $50.
mnunls eoliestod rvsuaed irom inf
rhnsfef ard anhsutuilou If thp cnur
hourr ani lhu furd ror ths road anl
frlANr fund ana flaa versa, nnd ihai
ga said date tho runniv rnmmlsnion.
fs cowt unnvfnNf irtasirrrv,l frnm
De- cnau house ana hn fund tn ihs
trnef.d funi lhe saai ~ o. 500 anf
rom thr mad and bride fund 60 tne
icneFsl funA ihc sum ~ 81 500
Ne ceef, ssape Erected
The plsiatlfis aiitEe ihsi dlfinF
lais no courthouse er isn aas rfeeicd
" contracted toT and that ~ ans mn
prNrmrnta AZ rcpair. ~~rr wade tbc,
seFo nominal nnd than the rosi would
iot eNecea ttoQ
The plaintiff, saS thst coo ie,, ~
lsls tg tho coarl house and BAN fund
vas msds lor lhe puYosc ~ supple
penting lhe Krasfal ssa rssaa tlnis
and thas sueh a lety VAS luegsi
CaanlN Collector rohn n new toi
c'ilns taxes ana 1hr ppAntlfls at
hd No Wln demand ihe con mtt an
'esr restrained ~ ths court A GEM
pafarN iniNRopea l. asked from sn,
dis,riet court rcissrsnina tho colloe
fion az taNt~ under such q ls,N ana
The cv0ft V askci ~ make the n.
iunctian permanent afl,r a hearins
has nscn had district 1uAsc Hopkins
rev he'dine conrt Ia lun Webs eeant,
reeelvoi sae pogitien lass nlsht and tht
hcarinE viii Nkcly br this mornins