Evening times-Republican. [volume] (Marshalltown, Iowa) 1890-1923, 1914-12-23

four hundred seventeen (l17) fese
south two hundred eight and ons-hals
(9OSk) feet, and east four hundred and
seventeen (l17) feet to beginning. also
The southeast quarter (x> Of section
No thirty (S0), township No. eighty.
I'VE (s5) north. range No. twenty COZ.
west Of tho 6th p. NJ. NArshall county.
Iowa: also
The northeast quarter tk) Of the
northeast quarter (A) Of section No.
thirty one (sl), township No. eighty
five (s5) north. range No. twenty (20).
west Of the 9Th p. NJ. Of Iowa, except
the right Of way OF the railway and
roads and highways; also
| The northeast fractional quarter (X)
OF section No. six CO... township No.
eighty (s4) north. range No
twenty (20), west Of the 9Th p. NJ. OF
Iowa, except a tract twenty-five (23l
rods square in the southeast cornee
thereof.
| Also claiming that william r. Fin.
ney and w. r. Phinney were one and
the same person.
| That Robert Levisee and Robert Lo-
visee were one and the same person.
! That Lovicy Babcock was the wife Of
| Henry Babcock.
l Moore were in fact one and tho Same
person.
That Raper Ellsworth ana Raper Ellis.
worth were in fact one and the same
person.
That Martha Ellsworth was in fast
the wife OF Raper Ellsworth.
That william Ellsworth and William
Ellsworth were in fact one and the
same person.
That c. q. Cobb and Chaa q. Cobb
were in fact one and the same person.
That Chas. q. Cobb was an unmarA
ried person on Nov. II. 1870.
That the foreclosure proceedings In
the circuit court OF Marshall county.
Iowa. at the February. 1879. term
thereof in the case OF J. c. Wyllis and.
II. F. Meeker. PLANTERS, VI. susan
Walkup ct al, defendants, was regular
in every particular.
That VIM. D. Sadler and W. d. Sad
Ter were in fact one and the same per-
son.
That James Mechanics, James Mo.
Names, and James McMannis were IN
fact all one ana the same person.
That Geo. B. Ely was administrator
Of the estate Of Fred L. Ely in August.
1881. and was acting az such admin.
istrator on Aug. 8. 1881.
That B. D. Eastman and d. B. East.
ma. were in fact one and the same
Same person.
That Ewing Brownheld died testats
previous to March I. 1884, that he LEFT
him surviving hts widow. Julia A.
Brownfield. and two children. Robert
L. Brownf1eld and Anna e. Huston a.
his sole heirs at law. That his estate
has been fully settled and all claims
1 Gall
That Americas Dakin never had any
right or title in and to tho foregoing
premises. and tho conveyance from him
was irregular and an error on the part
OF the scrivener.
That A. ]. Palmer ana Andrew J.
Palmer were In fact one and the Same
person.
That Mary W. Palmer. wife Of A. 2
Palmer. executed conveyance for tho
undivided one-half Of the real ESTATE
recorded IN Book 1oS, page 10. to her
husband. A. J. Palmer. but said dee(
has been lost and was never recorded
in the office OF the recorder Of Mar.
shall county. Iowa
That william II. n. Palmer ana WIZ
liam n. Palmer were one and the same
person. and that William n. Fl. Palmer
was IN unmarried man on Juno Z. 1872.
\ TnaI A0etOeft H0lh1OT WA0 IN UNI
married man on Dec. Z. 1879.
That Jaeon J. starin. executor. ana
Jacob J. Starin. executor. OF the estate
Of n. P. Wheeler deceased. was in fact
one and the same person.
It IL further claimed and averre0
! that the petitioners and claimants for
more than ten years last past have
been in actual. continued. visible. dis
, tinct. open. notorious hostile. and adj
verse possession OF the above described
premises under claim Of right and
color OF title and that all claims OF any
, OF the defendants or Of their heirs.
whether known or unknown and Of any
. Of the unknown claimants or their
heirs are fully barred by the statute
, Of limitations of this state. That the
; unknown heirs OF each Of the above
, named defendants, the unknown
l creditors, and the unknown claimants.
whether sane insane, or minors are
made defendants because Of any claims
}, they may or might assert in or to tho
real property described. that the exact
! interest such persons have or claim to
8 have or how the same Is derived. or
) claimed to be derived. or the mode or
: devolution thereof IS unknown to
3 these plaintiffs, and that any claim
that may be asserted by either OF the
J. heirs, known or unknown, or unknown
! claimants. unknown creditors. or the
. defendants named, 10 punior and inferior
to the claims of the plaintiffs, and the
3 same 10 barred and all persons named
= or referred to are estopped from max
! ing any claim TO the said real estate:'
> that the names and residences OF such
}. persons as are mentioned or referred
J to above, are unknown to these peti-
= TONERS; that diligsnt search has been
: made to learn the same or facts reiAs-
d ing thereto. or TO tho claims. II any
= they have. to the interests Of tho SAID
defendants, or their unknown heirs
. unknown creditors. or unknown clasm-
ants, ana are set forth az definitely -
can b done.
!; Plaintiffs pray that their claim OF
Ownership in said real estate be 60
o tablished IN fee simple as against any
). and all claims Of defendants and eacn
!, Of them. or any person claiming ~
= thru or under them: that they be des
= creed to have no right. title. or inter-
I est In the premises above Described.
u that tho unknown claimants. and un-
!. known creditors, whether sane. insane
: or minors. be decreed to have no right
49,