The Republican journal. [volume] (Belfast, Me.) 1829-current, 1914-05-07
sunreme Judicial Court.
,.,st;ce Albert M. Spear Of cardi.
|OaaN ner. Presiding.

,s,ts Justice Albert stst,s N, Spear Of c''''.
% the disposition of the
'OII owl " the civil docket in the April
9 - Of 1914; o,, VIC Justus C Straw
'ral'l r'outinued. . -, v;o,, a
Dee, ,S SU B Crockett vs. viola A
ebett, ., Tv' r Crockett VS. Geo A Crock
c0nt n9er VI Biddle VS. Leighton Parks.
tino {, x enzie VS. Kingsbury Crockett,
tnafss Bsrnum VS. Caroline E Stone,
tin1ea' l,art VS. A w Fletcher. ct al,
tinuFpa a'.s5oin vs. Lizzie D Moore, con-
IT. D Two cases.)
'g FurIey VS. John W Hartman,
d co,,' wis Rubber Company VS. A W
escon r. ' Al, continued. Five cases.)
tehea oil Company VS. A W Fetch
tai,J'i continued.
Ct 81, r R Thing VS. VIM A Richardson,
|! CO.. p Efmball, Libt VS. Gardiner A
t .I' continued,
n'll'' : S' ,paey, Libt VS. John Kenney.
tiH.iIs1 len VS. Cora A Fletcher, con-
ed: Vass,re, Libt VS. Chas W Mas
E ! 81 B3icsagII VS. Fields S Pendleton' ct
'onI.'' paterson, Libt VS. Ishmael
.nl llo,soa. dismissed.
/ iIg. 'V %3aI. ct al VS. John l Frederick,
!, c9 ,,'rr}rk VS. A l. Blaisdell, con-
yea. Foster, Libt VS. Mary Foster,
tlo 1isnort National Bank VS. w P Cole,
a !, eV1, c Fellows VS. L F Bartlett,
! ,ssr {, Fellows VS. M M Clark, con-
ned. .,, G Fellows VS. Arthur B Clark,
i t.l5' F Mitchell, Libt VS. Henry w
tIe sa continued. o,,
II Rogers VS. 0rison Chandler, con-
Ite Otis VS. John w Durost, con-
I5G, r rryon VS. Frank H Bagley,
~. ,l,u' Tole vs. Luther W Frederick, de-
I 'ssr 6 Hatch VS. Edwin E Hatch, ct
l Jv NJ Ward vs. Arthur M Jackson, to
y %osr5 by court on LIST day of Sept
5ousrj Hurd, App from decision of
~" commissioners, continued.
! ! Holmes VS. J A McKeen, App,
' s.pG h Field vs. Chas A Logan, ct al,
, stsq cited for further examination
m tie Des.
,s,jec F Gordon VS. Inhabitants of
i5o. neither party. no further action.
's.ey Fertilizer Company VS. Geo 0
'forrc motion for new trial filed;
we evidence to be filed by June LIST.
bapm Safe & Lock Co VS. Frank M
roanks. continued.
;porae Partridge VS. N M S R r Co,
v continued.
&c Roberts VS. Chas E Lane, neither
nv anil no further action.
Gca " Waldron VS. M A Moore,
v, Continued.
smes A Cole, Libt, VS. Nettie A Cole,
tnue9
bbie ; Holmes, Libt, VS. George B
Ines and John R Dunton, Trustee,
tinued,
ofa 3 NsaIley VS. SWEET & Co, con-
i A 0rdWay VS. Nettle Walker, con-
uec
/ T Wheaton VS. M M Dickey, con-
ued
as E sprague vs. 1oha Kenney' con-
he'd A Johnson VS. Addie Page, con-
uel.
IA WARD vs. George Norton, continu-
l Unworthy. NJ D, VS. Wilmot
pr, continued. e
|,,5sg Co VS. Walter Clark ell ais
4 Mason, app, VS. Nelson E Rey-
b, continued.
b. City National Bank of Belfast VS.
u Rich, continued.
Atbat Richie VS. L L and w H Rich
y, notion to continue for judgment
(dand granted.
l Bickford VS. Harrison Stevens,
ftnled
fshkfort Supply Co VS. VIM Knight,
ktnued.
Ftesler H Bellows VS. E F Littlefield,
ftnued.
fsrie " Simpson, app from decree of
eDaie Court, continued.
IN Barker VS. Perlie York ct al, con-
)rei
foIlns Durham Co VS. F M Fairbanks,
ktnued
aD Irving, Libt, VS. Edith M Irving,
RniSsed
fh Stoutenburgh VS. Emma D Films,
unled and dep filed.
Speenence Dodge VS. A F Bowen; pc
sul gr leave to amend filed.
pso Staples VS. Chas A Nealley, con.
W OF Burnham vs. Inh of Corinrh,
aef party, and no further action.
P1naaTd Oil Co VS. F M Fairbanks,
s!L Rankin vs. Clarence Weliman
", continued.
Sulh NJ Irving, Libt, vs. James I
XIX dismissed.
SSp0fayer vs. C W Parkham, con
NJ Benson VS. A W Pinkham, con
S M,s Parker, Libt, VS. Myron Parker
F t,uuf Boyd & Co VS. C A Bowden
.Ndf BOYD & Co VS. Herbert Kings