Weekly journal-miner. [volume] (Prescott, Ariz.) 1908-1929, 1914-11-11
MUCH BUSINESS TRANS
ACTED BY COURT
From SatnrGav's DailvN

purpose of calling the docket iOT
the term which commences NOvem-
Der 18th, it was expected that both
civil and criminal cases would be
taken up and dates fixed for the
complete docket. but County At
:orney O'Sullivan announced that
ne was not prepared to designate
the dates for trial OF many of the
cases. and the criminal docket was
passed over until date in the near
future.
The civil docket. however. was
gone over and dates set for all the
cases not dismissed OF otherwise
disposed of. In addition to this
business a great deal Of probate
court business was disposed OF, the
'ollowing resume being comprehen-
tive as to the whole proceedings
which consumed the forenoon:
Civil Cases.
Conroy vs.. Conroy. December 8.
State VS.. Saratoga Gold Mining
Company. Nov. Is.
Brooklyn Arizona Mining Com
,any VS.. +. +. Small. Nov 10.
Commercial Trust Company vs..
oacihc Mining Company, Nov. 70.
Thomas V. Freyda, demurrer,
Nov. "a.
Cora Suder VS.. Albert Heller ct
|. demurrer. Nov. Is.
Benedict vs.. London Arizona Min
Company, Nov. Is.
Dye VS.. Dye. Nov. 10.
Duncanson VS.. Brooklyn Arizona
Mining Company. Nov. p.
Townsend VS. Townsend. Nov ?
F. A. Farmer VS.. L. " Crabb ct
i, Nov. p.
Yavapai County VS.. D. NJ. Clark.
ecovery of money. Nov. Is.
Shut VS.. Meyers Drug Company,
Vov. lS
Recs vs.. Sheffield. Nov. 20
Morrison VS.. Saratoga Mining
'ompany. Nov p.
Danford VS.. Logos Mines Co. ct
!, Nov. IS
United Verde Copper Company
$ Hull, Nov. 10.
State Mutual Insurance Company
5. Ferguson. Nov. 70.
Wade VS.. Thacker ct al, Nov. 49,
| Thomas VS.. Sheffield, set for trial
esterday.
H. D. Barry VS.. Owl Drug and
andy Company. Nov. 20.
w. J.. Richards and J. T. Rich
! rds VS.. w. \. Allen and Yonda
| \llen, his wife. Dec. l.
State OF Arizona VS.. Saratoga
l iold Mining Company, demurrer,
Gov 1S
Frank Fenton vs.. John \. Twiggs
nd Gertrude r. Twiggs. Nov. Is
Grace Jackson VS.. Charles w.
/ ackson. Nov. 10.
Cases Disposed OF.
In the case OF Kelly VS.. Briganza
| lines Company, an order was made
or judgment in favor OF the plain
if in the sum of $3.50, by stipu-
| alton OF counsel.
Head VS.. Engles ct al. dismissed
motion of Attorney Russell for
| he defendant.
Dreyer vs.. Yeager Cannon Cop
,er Co. dismissed by motion of
\ttorney Russell for defendant
De Lion Securities and Realty Co.
5. Brooklyn Arizona Mining Co.,
dismissed on motion of Andrews &
'orest.
d. Harrington VS.. y. Stutz, dis
| missed by order of court
Hattie NJ. Thompson VS.. Albert
thompson, dismissed. No appear
nee
Fred Johnson VS.. T. c. Snider,
action for new trial denied and case
dismissed
F. G. Brown VS.. Chas No Shaw
nd wife, dismissed on motion of
efendants' attorney.
R. \. Everts VS. Marguerite Evcrts
ismisscd on motion of r. p. Tai
rot.
Mary \. Sheridan VS.. William
sheridan, dismissed on motion r. +.
Morrison.
Delade VS.. Delade, dismissed by
rider of court
Utter VS.. Utter. dismissed by mo-
ION OF attorney for defendant.
Judgment for plaintiff in the sum
II S4O0.63 was entered in the case
VI VIM. Thomas VS.. John t. Shcf-
ield.
Probate Business.
Estate of John Drain, decree made
establishing notice to creditors
Estate of Fannie Kautz, decree
made establishing notice to creditors
Estate OF the Fernandez minors.
rider made authorizing loan OF funds
belonging to estate.
Estate of Shadrack Hunters. V.
1unter was appointed administrator
md bond in sum of $1,000 approved
=. +. Gentry. Chas. NJ Raible and
p. J. Keohane being appointed ap-
,raisers OF the estate.
Estate OF Richard S. Barnes. de-
rec made establishing notice to
,reditors and c. E Gentry. c. NJ.
2aible and r. T. Bclcher appointed
appraisers.
Estate of ROSA Rubio Blair al
mitted to probate and A. c. Burmis-
.cr appointed administrator on bond
Of $65O00. !. !. Gardner, E. J. F.
Horne and Z. O. Brown were ap-
DOinted aDDraisers Of This estate