The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1914-04-25
APPELLATE DIVISION DECISIONS.
List Handed Down Yesterday By the
First Department.

IuoWn yesterday ny inc Appellate DiviSlof
First Department:
borough Rapid Trapsit Company. .appeiisn
Sndsment and order reversed and new tri.
Unless w,n n.o, . to ~ to SS
the jqdsmen. as so reduced and the ord,
No opinion. Insrahsm. p. J. add McLausi
lin, j., dissenting. and voting for revers,
as AGAINST the weight Of evidence. settl
irving Masten. respondent. vs.. J. Pembrok
ga Gr fIss affirmed with costs No opinion
sidney Masten, an infant, &C. responder
ns,,S a. Pembroke Bonsai. i'm pleaded. &c. az
costs No opinion. order filed.
The Psopfe. &C. respondent, VS.. orang
county MIX Association. appellant. Juds
m sr t,i affirmed with costs No opinion. Or
Jonas Hecht. respondent, vs. Ignats wah
appellant. Judgment affirmed With cost,
NO opinion Order filed.
Fire Insurance. Company Of New YORK. nor ":
spcnndsnt Judgment and order affirmed
oyer Fire INSURANCE Company. i5S App Div
Brothers. lss Fed. Rep As. order filed
Alpern. respondent: Judgment and order re
| verses and new trial ordered. with costs I,
eSl.m SETH. ofSss on s'f no,ic. Opinion pc
Frank Tortoreili respondent. VS. Bron,
cut stone Company appellant. Judgmen
a nrd. or1 i Affirmed with costs. No opinion
pr Michael Hughes. appellant. vs. Como,
aTf1tnnS' rtspondsnt. Judsment and ordei
Giovanni II. Lobrovico. respondent, ", TIL.
Cly OF New York, appellant. judgment and
o Iasr afnrmed. With costs on former opinion
Laughlin, j.. dissenting on former dissen;ina
opinion. Order filed.
The People, &c. respondent. VS. samue,
Jpdsment affirmed No Opinion a'pe order
N the Matter Of Henry c. Valentine. d..
BE-. sssr. . 1fRqn, 's .nS apt S
Ion per curtain. settle order on n sgii opih
ella 'I pnn Gumpsl ct al; appellants. vs. Fran.
men, affirmed win costs s'p So cpsionJ ue o..
;ssSS wssh.ls5 appellant VS. c.or..
Jean b colo%bet D" app sds1 h'a y. Tn.
sT@sS Win Costs s'eSsd sPinoS Sudf uqset
ps %ssns: E ss%uas Trp s,. SsTR.q.
Sr E dpp p,,S a., judgment and order az,
iri;i I.ieTse order MED '''"''" OF Ns'sn'
aS Samss k iw as So aSdm!nlsrstor. &C. appel
armed With costs 40 opinion order alsa
co Tine Ps0ple' Se Ts,pondsnt. ys. Erie =
"F &.a..r ~ s ssSaf,. oTdss aisS
Judgment and order Alarmed, with eosis
No kS sH,.,9ln GRAZ H,i asa
Edward y Mailman. appeiip Dpaeht or6.,
nodded msd,s BY Relying counsel Zee to $50, ana
opInio1 '" ors.r nn, i.S' Without costs. No
y Samuel Posn.r 81 al. respondents. v,
stIiTmsd; with 80 costs and disbars.msrnnta.t.
a. SO cost. and Disbursements No opinion
, In the Matter Of the Washington Savings
sank. In liquidstien. order affirmed Win
o Or So; s,.s and disbursements 40 opinion,
M0, Mn.,, Bartlett ". John f. Harri, ct
II. sh SliiRs s"r.,s!i E; al sppsIani;
srm.d With jic costs snd ai.os olss ~,
No opinion; order iled.
. srSas,f1 viii, %D;i ss Sra.r
~ yIs,er prbsno,, appellant, VS.. Harry C.
v.f.:d Win 10 cGsi! and 2.sS5 5s
and motion granted, with $40 costs opin.
P!sp. 'ss'i r.. A esS; hss a..o appellant
r. Dsgsrsmsa. o. Health % III. Civ o.
EsA 81 !a: :1' s. and disbursement No oDia
Regina Kapisr.t.ln as sdmlni,rstrl.. &C..
order snirm.d Wi,h 40 hoo costs 'es sTa s.
pG Mon,s No opinion order MED
frs.s respondent order affirmed, Win
d az so ~. and di'ourssmen's No opinion.
Martha v l.. buchanan, respondent W
,,rs ss J., buchanan. appellant order AZ
Mo Sp,n,S with w. , ,ts and disbursements
Edward d. Graft. Observation-Disclosures vs.
1..nsnsn Brothers Company appellant
and disbursements TO the plaiutiN the mo-
ton to vscste the order FOR thr examination
~ the defendant before trial denied and he
order for examination r.instdted, the d..
OF the Examination TO BE- fixed on scttle-
ward Hatch Jr, appellant order affirmed
with 80 costs and disburssments No opin.
Morrel GODDARD. appellant. vs. Charles r
f.rk,s &c., e, al defendan,s, Louis $ owsley,
firmed. with $40 costs ana DISBURSEMENT.
No opinion. order filed
Maud Il. Norisn. respondent, vs. Mortimer
ducinR counsel fee 10 $3.50 ana as modified
anrmsd without costs. No opinion. Ord,r
Elizabeth A. Kelly vs. Rachel J. Kremm
- al Motion 10 dismiss appeal granted
WIN 80 eosts. order filed.
,, al Motion 10 dismiss appeal i'' eran, IN
without costs order filed.
~
II al Motion to dismiss appeal granted
with $40 costs order filed
Eugene Hisgons " Alwold Realty Com
nany ct al Motion to dismiss granted, with
30 costs, unless defendants comply MIN
erm- stated in order order filod
Louise Sinnott ward Bread Comn,nv
Motion TO dismiss appeal denied. with so
William II Hale vs. Albert J seligs,srr
! al. Application denied with 80 costs |
Charles NJ Morand w. Manhattan Nayiss
ion COMPANY Application denied, with 80
Josef skiba W. Holbrook Cabot 4 Rollins
Corporation. Application denied. with SO
'osts. order signed.
Isaac GoldwitE 81 al va Henry Kupfcr 4
%. Application denied with SO costs. Or !
Ter signed
Louis Et,linrer vs. Theodore Kruger. An
,lioato on denied, Win 80 costs order
l.ncd
Charles A Holingsworth W. New York
Railways Company. Application denied, |
With 30 costs. order sisnet,
,ppli,aton denied, with 90 costs, order |
signed.
The Messiah Home for children. &c. vs. |
Henry II Rogers, Jra individually ct a. |
Notion granted question certified as stated |
~ order. order filed |
Morris Feinsot Ell al. Va Maurice J Bur |
stein. Motion granted order hled
Christina othout vs. Mary Warner ct |
~ Motion granted, question certified a.
'taisd In order order Med.
ion denied, with 40 costs order MED
Albert Burke Va. Pittsburg Contracting |
'ompamy Motion denied, With SO costs
brdcr hlcd
samuel y Bolles. vs. william schesr. No
ion denied, with $40 costs order nirI
- F.Hl ra.N