The Jones County news., 1914-05-07


Again in one chapter land here
only we have before us two OF the
Masters more famous parallels, the
unjust steward and the rich man and
Lazarus. Both are parallels of warn
ing against the common sins of hypoc-
risy and gluttony. Luke links this
teaching with the events in connec-
ton with our Lords teaching about
the lost things, There is clearly
close connection. The parable of the
lost things was spoken directly to the
Phariseos and scribes. that now be-
fore US to the disciples. The fall
ure of the Pharisees as stewards of
the things of God, the divine law,
calls-from Jesus. for those gathered
as his disciples, teaching that will
prepare them to fulfll perfectly the
stewardship responsibilities. The story
Is both positive and negative, is
direct against covetousness, and its
main purpose to us is how TO use
money, while we have 1t, so that 1t
may bring us recompense IN the
eternal world when It Is gone ". %.
Immoral Acts Not Approved.
|. The Unrlghteous Steward, w. f-3.
Our Lord does not, of course, intend
that this steward Is to be our pattern
In every respect. He is taking a
"son OF the world" (v. r. VI and
showing us that. in the use Of money
entrusted to his care, he is making
provision for the future. He is pre-
pairing himself against the time when
his stewardship Is taken from him.
How much more shall son OF the
light be shrewd. so to use the money
entrusted to his stewardship, that
when it is taken from him, he has
provided for the future. The record
does not imply that Jesus approved of
the mans immoral actions. lie is u.s.
ing the example of an uprighteous
steward as a contrast to show how
much more is to be expected from God
or godly men, Luke 1876, Z; 11:5-8;
Matt 12.11, 10. Recognizing these
facts, the story is perfectly simple and
straightforward. The dishonest son
OF his age" has a wrong method,
though his motive from this point of
view Ia a wise-and prudent one, cleFer
in our modern use of that word. This
does not condone his fraud, nor dces
our Lord commend him. The contrast
is established in the parable between
men wholly Of their age, and men,
professedly, at least sons of light In
their dealings with eternal things they
had not shown the same astuteness
ftf.4f fsssur nh a la atafff fhel
heartless contempt OF the Pharisees
for those who are lost, while the
parallels of this chapter deal with
ardship-faithfmness U Cor. 5:2}.
On Higher Level.
II. The Use Of Money, VS.. 9-f3. The
value Of this parable is in the actual
teaching of Jesus which follows the
sizing the need for wisdom on the
part of all stewards After that we
are on a higher level and In a clear
er atmosphere. Unrighteous nam.
mon means money, and to mako
friends "by means of the mammon OF
unrighteousness" (R. VI is SO to
use our money for the godly poor as
W " III AuGIl lON0 anu lsltAb llCJ may
receive us into the eternal tabernacles
to which they shall go, see Matt 10:
21; 25:33-4o; 6:19; | Tim. 6:17-19;
Prov. 1917. AS has been said. Jesus
does not commend this steward for his
wrong use of his masters money, but
the steward of God has the right to
bestow his Masters goods upon tho
ho$ tn
have been bestowed upon him-en-
trusted to his care. Matt. 24:45;
Pet 4:10. Our entrance into the king
dom viii be more abundant because OF
our liberality with Gods money, Matt.
1921. This does not preclude faith
but rather, reaffa faith worketh by love.
Gal Sc. James Alb (R. W. IL
we are faithful with that entrusted to
our stewardship, God will entrust US
with the true riches" Our earthly
riches belong to another ". IL r. W,
and we cannot serve two masters.
This story moves within the realm Of
material wealth, e. g., of mammon. 1t
illustrates the higher wisdom of how
mammon fs To be used by the stew
ards OF the kingdom OF God. Verses
Is and 16 OF this chapter reveal to us
our Lords reason for such an illustra-
ton It was directed against the COW
etous and false stewards, the Phari-
sees, who 'scoffed at him because they
were lovers Of money! We are to
use money so as to make friends, not
friends for this present life, but for
that life which lies beyond the grave.
Stewardship principles are always
the same, no matter what the amount,
"he that is unrighteous In a very little
is unrighteous also in much" This
argument is followed by two ques-
tions The answer TO the first ia that
no one ever commits the stewardship
Of spiritual things to those who are
unfaithful in material things A man
shows by his faifhfulness in material
things whether be is to be entrusted
with spiritual stewardship. The sec-
ond question Is answered in that men
do not give that which is their own to
those who have not been faithful as
trustees.