The Washington times., 1914-11-25
BUSINESS MEN GIVE
ATTRACTIVE PRIZES
Team Finishing With High Set
Percentage Will Be Awarded
Hundred Dollars.

Probably no one Of the younger duck
pin leagues of the city has hung so at
tractive list of prizes as that which
will be awarded the teams and indi-
viduals which roll in the Business Men s
circuit, which has headquarters at the
Brunswick alleys, at Sixth and I
streets.
A cash prize OF 500 will be given the
team which finishes first in the compe-
tition which commenced on October i
and which ends on May 6. Prizes of $40
and 80 will be given the teams finishing
second and third, respectively. Other
attractive awards include - 1or each
man finishing with the highest aver
age on each team. Officers OF the Busi-
ness Mems League are w. Muir, presl-
dent; s. Phillips, secretary and treas
urer. and p. c. Jones, official scorer.
The complete schedule has just been
announced and is printed here Tor the
use Of the rollers and the followers
of the league:
November 25-Hocke VS.. Saks; q, Ber-
herich VS.. Parker Bridget; 30, Rudolph
q West VS.. Lansburgh.
December |, Parker Bridget VS.. Saks;
.. Hoeke VS.. Swift K Co: 4, Berbcrlch
VS. CapitOls: :, Rudolph &, West VS.
Saks & Co; 8. L.ansburgh VS.. Hoeke;
9, Beroerich vs. Swift &, Co; Il, Parker
Bridget vs.. CaptOls; II. Rudolph X
West VS.. Swift: ID. Parker Bridget VS..
Iansburgh; l6 Hocke vs. Berberich; 1S
CaDitols VS. Saks II Co.
January 4. Rudolph & West vs.. Ber-
berich; D. Swift x Co. VS.. Capltols; D.
I.ansburgh VS.. Saks K Co; S, Hoeke VS.
Parker Bridget: II, Rudolph & West We.
Parker Bridget; r. Lansburgh Vs. Ber-
berich; 13, Saks VS.. Swift & Co; To-
CapitoIs VS.. HOeke; IS. Rudolph & West
VS. Hoeke: ~. Parker Bridget VS.. Swift;
% Saks & Co. vs. Berberich: p. CAPT
tolls VS. T.ansburgh; .. Rudolph & West
VS. Capitols: &c. Lansburgh VS.. Swift; ;
q, Hccke vs. S"k" x Co; %. Berbcrlch
vs.. Parker Bridget.
February /. Lahs0urgh VS.. Rudolph &
West: >, Parker Bridget VS.. Saks & Co;
,, H0eke Vs. Swift; =, Bcrberich vs..
CapitOls: 3, Saks vs. Rudolph
& Wet; 3, Lanshurgh vs.. Hoeke:
10. Herberich Vs. Swift; T. Parker
RlidGrt VS.. CaDitols: j.. Swift vs. Ru-
dolrh &; West, ls. Parker Bridget VS..
Lansburgh; Il, Hoeke VS.. Rerberich;
70 Cap tolls vs.. Saks: -. Berberich VS..
Rudolph & West: 23 Swift VS.. Capitols;
"a. Lanshurgh W. Saks; 20, Hocke VS..
Parke~ Bridget.
March-1. Parker Bridget VS.. Rudolph
q West: ,. Lansburgh vs.; Berber' ch;
3, Saks VS.. Swift: ). Capitols vs.. Hoekc;
: Hoeke KS. Rudolph * West; 9. Parker
Rrideet vs. Swift; 10, Saks VS.. Ber-
! erich: l.. CapitOls vs.. Lansburgh: Is,
Car!tols vs. Rudolph d West; 16 I-ans-
lUrgh vs.. Swift; Il. Hockc VS.. Saks &;
CO.; 49, B"rb"rich vs.. Parker Bridget;
-. RudolNh q West vs.. Lansnurgh: 90.
Parker Hridget vs.. SaIIs &, CO.: "a,
I!,"k" W, Swift; 26, Berbcrich VS..
'hpitois; g. Rudolph & West vs.. Saks
4 CO.: %. LanSburgh vs.. HO"ke; y.
l;"rh"rich -. Swift.
Nnli!-2. Parker Bridget vs. Capitols;
:. Rudolph & West vs.. Swift; 6. Parker
bridget vs. LanSburgh; Z Hook" VS.
H"rb"rich. .. CapitoIs vs.. Saks; l.. Ru-
G"lph & West W Eerherich; l%, Swift
". EapitOls: "a LHnsburgh vs. Saks:
l6. lioeke vs.. Parker Bridget; 49, Ru-
dolph & West vs. Parker Bridget 80
LansburGh vs.. Bcrberich; 81. Saks vs.
swift; -. Capitols Vs. HOeI:e: 26. Ru-
rolph u West W. IIOcke: q, Parker
:tridect " Sw II: 2S Saks vs. Ber-
b-'i"h: ~. Capitols Us. Lanshurgh.
May. Rudolph & West VS.. Capitols:
!. l-ansburEh vs.. Swift; 4, ifoeke vs.
- q Co.; 8. Bcrberich vs.. Parker
Bridget.