Norwich bulletin., 1914-10-01

Ll1eIl SuHlVan or New LOndOu against her husband, John Sullivan, to whom she was married on Aug. 16, Ass2. Since the first of August 1912, she claims he has neglected to provide support for her, although able to do so. She is poor and unable to support herself. Real estate on Ann avenue in New London belonging to the defend ant. has been attached in the sum of s4,000.
 Claims Contract.
 Damages of s2,000 are asked in a suit brought by the Eastern Concrete Construction Co.,, of Boston, against Lewis M. Young of this city, doing business under the name of the Con- neeticut Engineering and Contracting a bid for 5000 with MT. Young on Jan. g. 1910. to do certain metal lathing, etc, at a building, which was accepted by the defendant, with a proviso that the Boston Co. should satisfactorily compensate the Howard Co. This compensation the plaintiff claims he made but on Feb. 26 MT. Young notified the plaintiff that no contract existed and he has ever since refused to allow the Boston company to go on with the work.
 Husband IntoIerabIy Cruel.
 On the grounds of intolerable cruel ty since July 1890 and habitual in temperance. Alice Selina Conant. whose maiden name was Burns, asks divorce from Frank E. Conant of Contoocook, New Hampshire. The plaintiff resides in Stonington. They were married on Oct. 13, 1889. The custody of a minor child is asked for.
 Brakeman Sues Fertilizer Co,
 Frank E. Hadley, of Groton, a brake man. in the employ of the New Haven road, brings suit against the c. M. Shay Fertilizer Co, of Groton, for S10.000 damages, for injuries which the plaintiff received on July IS, 1904, while the brakeman was on a. freight siding that ran alongside a building at the Shay works. The claim is made that a nail and board, protruding from the shed, caught the clothing of the brakeman, so that he was rolled and crushed against the car, suffering a wound in breast, bruised on leg, arm, back and abdomen, and internal in- juries. of which the extent is not yet known.
 Sues Daughter -in-Iaw for Alienation.
 Mrs. Lydia G. Hewitt of Waterford, asks $15,000 damages in a suit brought against Mrs. Alice G. Hewitt of the same town, who is the widow of her son, who died about seven years ago. The plaintiff charges the defendant with alternating the affections of the plaintiffs husband, George W. Hewitt The complaint also alleges 8 statutory offense committed since 1908 between the husband and the defendant in tho case. Special bail of s15,000 has been provided in the case as the writ di- rected a body attachment.
 Claims for Stone and Trees.
 Damages of s15,0o0 are sought by Clark H. Rice of Voluntown, from the Goldman & Trumbull O., of Litchfield, which he charged with unlawfully en- tering upon his land at Voluntown and carting away. on May l. 1914, two cords of wood, 113 loads of gravel, IT loads of loam, and sevesal pieces of stone wall. besides cutting down three apple trees, blasting several hundred tons of stone and leaving the stone scattered all over the land.
 New London Wife Wants Divorce.
 Divorce on the grounds of a statu- tory offense committed between Isa- belle Williams at New London, is asked fby Charlotte Champlin Allen, in a suit for divorce from J. Elmer Allen of New London. The couple was married on July q, 1902. The wife asks for the custody of two children.
 Husband Has Gone to Rounnania.
 Abraham Ancelowitz, formerly of Norwich, but now in Rounania, is sued for divorce by his wife, Yetta Brownstein AnceIowitz, to whom he was married, on Dec. "A, 1904. Fraud in the marriage contract is alleged on the ground that the husband had epilepsy. The wife asks for the cus- tody of a minor child.
 Fingers Cut Off in Buzz Pianer.
 Damages of s1o.00O are sought from the H. R. Douglass Co. Inc, of New London, by Manuel J. Sousa, who lost four fingers of his right hand, which were cut off by g. buzz planer and his thumb was so injured that it has be- come permanently stiff. This happen ed on Oct. 1. 1913, while the plaintiff who is a carpenter was working the buzz planer, in the Douglass shop The claim is made that the machinery was negligently and improperly equip ped With an extra set of knives, not designed for the machine, and that the enploye was not properly in- structed as to it's use.