The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1914-02-14

!. dsscntins and voting for athrnianccj
Settle order on notice
silk i'rderwear COMPANY appellant Juds
mcnt affirmed with cu-'-. OPINION 10y Clarke.
! order filed
Thomas H. Ball. respondent " Julian y
Gerard q NJ appellants. order reversed With
$40 costs and disbursements ami motion granted
With $40 COSTS owmo' hy 'lar'"' y Order
.Guillaume Rcu-cu-. ,..pondcn,. " AZ an
" Gerard ct al. appcllaui- order affirmed
with 80 costs and disbursements. uplniun by
Clarke ! order tl"d
Armida " veueroso RESPONDENT. v Smear
| 4 Co. appellant judi mcut and order affirmed
With costs Opinions hS ir-Ialam y J. aud
| Orolcf fled
Eytinse & Co Inc. respondent y. Atlantic
Transport Complain. appellant. EN'"Iiiuns
sgsars 1erdsi set .Js 9 ,n dIsnGan, tor o
| abide event Opinion b, scott j. Settle order
on notice
The People. Sc y. Charlie. Kaye appellan,
! Judsment affirmed opinion hy scott u
Order tled
IRWIN T Loniwortn. spncllag' ~ ., Ea,,
/ River National Rsuk. respondent IinlsmeW
affirmed with costs; rlsintln's el-hih pro,
| posed finding found "y the Court reversed 10
| by the ~ idcn''. oumou 10y CLARKE y "ctil'
| orner on notice
Tho People S.. rc.pondeot, ~ Geo.;.
OPINION order hied
The People. S.. respondent. .ys Henry {.
| ION by scott J Oruor fl,d
| Maria J. Nentimislla. RESPONDENT vs Ninia
| Eichner ~ adnIus'rat-iN defendant The
| City OF New York. appellant. Order affirmed
with 81 costs and disbursements No opimoit
| MAJOR Zlslcr. Respondent - Holbrook Cabot
| Rollins Corporation, app'Ua prdcr MAO
TIED by rcdi'qn- the condition upon which
the defendant Wa permitted to amend the
answer to thc psHmcr, Of 81 motion .o-,-'
| No opinion settle order Of noil'r
! Joseph " stern - al. respondents "
! Bernhard HcrsmansSy appellant order mod.
40 - AZ cd
! Nil aryhl,n apd SON. JJ di..cnt and vote
20 rcvcr~e order and yara;c attachment on
ground stated in memorandum Scil" orn'r
( pr'n,osraah sales Company. respondent "
| American Addressing & Naihn- Complain, az
! polllni Appeal di-m,~-rd. with so cost aiL
rc.rou pamcl COMPANY sppcllsr' "a Lon
! dent order affirmed. With 80 costs and U-
/ bur-enleu'. No opinIon Order hied -
erIand rr.p"nir,, orirr affirmed Win $50
! costs aud disbursements No opinion ord'r
Louis Aucrh9ch. respondent. " Aaron r
/ NusbaIm ct al. appellants. Order affirmed
! with SO costs and disbursements No opinion
Elm Elmer Kmharp appellant v. Waldo.
! dent orders affirmed. viii so costs and dis
! burscmcut- No opinion Orders nlcd
Ca'hcrInc u Muidoon respondent ~ Car
ord.r re-, ersed with 81. costs and d.bnr.e.
| mcni- and motion -tulc!. "iih SO costs
Naional E.r"g,rooins Con, p, sn,g,an,
| al, respondents orl.r reversed. with 80
Gusts and d,,'uI.em"n'- and motion .om'd
with $40 cost 10 opinion orddcr dlci -,...
DEVELOPMENT Company. lupleldct With othcr-
snondort. oricr anifmct with $40 ,o.'- and
disbursements opwon pr curtain Order
Frank NJ case j.. respondent. IS Eug,no
7 Walter ct al. lliIfs order MOI f'N "a
directed IN opinion and A. 80 modified affirmed
without cost Opinion per "ur'im Settle
Peoplc < re, ret Ssarfnh G19stqr'h appci.
OPINION Order 'lcd
Louis Mas1iola. appellant. ~ william H.
spondcnts. Order affirmed WITH $40 ros's and
Maurice D"chrs a. re civcr, &c. respondent,
V wostru pcNclonmeni COMPANY APPELLANT.
ordsr airmCa %,'h d 81 "3i No. and d-bnr'c
Eicc,ric F'xiurc Complain, defendant Fr'I,
Henry lIoelljes respondent. order modified ne
directed m OPINION and 40 so modified affirmed
| without costs. opi'uon per cutian. settle
kaihryn leoGpori. r,e,npq9gdem " Charles !;
costs and disbursements No OPINION order
filed
p. ralrchnd. appellant. order affirmed.
WITH so costs aud disbursements. No opiu-
Thomas y ,Hopgood. respondent. ". Nj
m"nts No opinion prdcr filed.
sara lLtb"rmnn, respondent Us. Joseph
without costs, aud motion 10 amend Judg
ment granted 70 eN'cn, stated In opinion
Il samuel SchwdrtZman, appellants, Ns. L.
Edward letter seS AL, rSIp1nd,en,s order
aud motion denied, with $40 costs. No opin'
> !
N'n apsaan "a'f' Is n"' KSoss NS Ss tor
eCutor, &c respondent order am med
Patrick J. M'Nulty W. city Of .New York
Motion to dismiss appeal granted. with Sc
In the matter Of Henry CArdos vs.. william
dismiss appeal granted, With $40 costs. uu-
less appellant comply with terms state,
William r. Rock ". Anna \ Rock Mo.
ton TO dismiss appeal granted unless appel
Ian, comply with t"rm' stated in order
william = Malta ". lncien KNAPP I'm,
with SO costs, order nled.
Lillian, u shu'nan v George II Shu
man Motion To dismiss appeal denied
MeMG"rsH seyi%Es Bank V 1imo' noa!n
miss appeal granted, With so Gusts order
viane' Motion 10 dismiss appeal granted
with so costs unless appellant cnmpl!
l |
edwin y. S"hut Ginger -. \ u Grange
: | GRANTED, with sl0 costs. unless appaIlan
| comply with terms stated IA order. order
. / nled.
Bertha Boiling W.. Prudential Insuraur
| Company of America, Nol.un to dismis
| appeal granted. with SO costs. unless ap
| peilant comply with terms stated in order
| order fled.
! Moses Wolfe ~. James f. Mack Motio
| denied, with SO costs, order MED
| People eN rel Christopher kcnchan vs.
| Thomas J, Higgins AK Commissioner. g.
| Motion denied with $40 costs order tiled
| Matter OF Alexander Mcdonald, decea SOC
! Motion granted, questions certified, orde
| flied.
. y. " Catholic rrotoc,ory W Eocklan
County, Motion granted, question cc'
, titled order filed
, walter Athau'" W.. United statos ste'
, | Corporation; Same ~. Richard Trmhl,
II william Thcilc vs., Initod states steel 20,
q tons granted. orders filed.
, | Arthur T.. Jacobs ", Monatuu Realty In
t. vesting Corporation. Morton granted; aues
o lions certified. order filed
The Security Bank Of New York vs., Her
#, man Finkelstein. Morton granted. ords
~ filed.
10 Harry n, Chalmers w. Franklin Murph
81 al Motion denied, with SO costs. ord,
= filed
Il Harry Elshcls vs. James +, Fargo, .
" treasurer. Sc Motion denied, wiih 81
1910 broadway Corporation Vs. ocorg