Morris tribune. [volume] (Morris, Minn.) 1880-2000, 1914-10-16
CRESCENT co. FINED
FOR DISCRIMINATION
PAID HIGHER PRICE AT
HANCOCK.
Indicted for Discriminating in
the Price Paid for Butterfat at
Hancock and Clontarf, the
Crescent Creamery Co. Pleads
Guilty and is Fined $780,
Other Court Cases.

Other Court Cases.
The Crescent Creamery Co., of ST.
Paul, plead guilty at the term of the
district court held this week to vio-
lating tne law forbidding discrimina-
ton, and was find $3.50.
The company maintains buying
station at Hancock and also one at
. Clontarf, and was charged with pay
ing higher price at Hancock, where
there is competition with a farmers
cooperative company than at Clon.
tart, where there is no such competi.
tion. This is contrary to a law
passed bv the last legislature.
Two cases have been tried to a
jury. The first was that of Thos. C.
Day & Co. VS.. John E. Knight for
damages on account of Mr.. Knight
not taking a farm loan after he had
signed an application. The jurv found
for the plaintiff, and Judgment was
rendered for $6O5.
The case of Michael Heating VS..
James Graham is now on trial. This
will be the last jury case.
The following was the disposition
of the other cases -
CONTINUED CASES.
W. B. Otto VS.. Aug. Danzeisen,
John Ross, Aug. F. Huebner. j.
A. Yarger, Geo. N. Clark and D. j.
Linsley.
Theo. Hamm Brewing Co. VS..
Minnie Carney.
Andrew Iverson VS.. Hancock
Creamery Co.
Merchants National Bank, corpor-
alton VS.. Sophia Hensch, doing busi-
ness as Chokio Implement Co.
COURT GASES.
Frank A. Mullen VS.. Otter Tail
Power Company "a corporationl !.
Set Tuesday morning.
St. Paul Sash, Door & Lumber Co.
VS.. F. A. Hancock.
Bodil Larson VS.. Rasmus Larson
and Spooner Investment Co.
Kneeland A. Linsley VS.. w. H.
Colean; W. H. Colean, receiver of
Colean Manufacturing Company, cor
poration, and the Colean Manufactur-
ing Company, corporation.
M. L. Ransom and J. A. Murphy,
co-partners under the firm name and
style of Murphy & Ransom vs.. Emil
o. Bell.
Henry Schmidgall VS.. William
Wagner.
= Herman Woodke, vs.. Fred Struck.
E. ]. Jones Lumber Co., VS., John
HiIlstrom, John Grove. j. H. Walz.
and W. C. Light.
Victor E. Wilson, VS.. Peter Ennen.
Mable Clifford VS.. Bert Clifford.
S. j. Stebbins vs.. Steve Gore.
DISMISSED CASES.
W. j. Loughead VS.. r. ''B. Ridge
way, T. H. Mcguire and Lawrence
Schauster. Answer withdrawn by de-
PENDANTS.
Sophia Hencsh, doing business und.
er the firm name and style, of Chokic
Implement Company VS.. Calvin P.
Williams, Thomas Williams and A.
II. Williams, co-partners under the
firm name and style of Williams
Brothers.
j. H. Oevenney VS.. George ]. Cam.
eron, George S. Fry, B. F. Crem'
shaw and Nels Johnson.
4 A. I. Awsumb vs.. c. C. Ersted as
. executor, and Emil A. King, DaviC
T. Killing, Henry King, Alfred
Killing, Hannah King and Nellie
Killing, heirs of the estate of johanna
King, deceased.
D. M. Holsinger VS.. John Grove
SETTLED CASES
David S. Long VS.. John Grove.
Alfred Weltzin VS.. John Bengston,
sometimes spelled Bengtson).
Henry Winters VS.. Carl E. Peder.
son.
Stephen j. Gutter, by Elizabeth M.
Gutter, his general guardian vs.. Great
Northern Railway Co., a corporation
Peterson Hardware Company, 6
corporation, VS.. Emma Galland anC
Willis Galland.
Albert Bjoraas VS.. Consolidated
School District No. 19, Alberta,
Mimi.
Andrew A. Hallberg, Jr. VS..
Walter Brisbane.
AIvina Schleuter VS.. William Mohr.
Andrew Nelson VS.. August Engle.
hardt.