The Wallace miner. [volume] (Wallace, Idaho) 1907-current, 1914-10-29
A.P. HUTTON'S SPEECH
M|SSTATES THE FACTS
DENIED CREDIT TO BUNKER HILL
FOR WHAT COMPANY HAS
DONE FOR KELLOGG.

A. p. Hutton, democratic candidate
for state senator, was speaker at a
recent democratic meeting in Kellogg,
and the assertions he Is credited with
making are SO far at variance with
the prevailing opinion regarding the
relations OF the Bunker Hill & Sulli-
van company with the people of that
sufficient Importance to make an eff
fort to get at the truth. AS result
Of this effort 1t Is evident that Mr.
Hutton does not credit the people of
the community In which he lives with
having a particle of memory and la
bors under the delusion that they look
upon him as the democratic Moses to
lead them through the wilderness of
Bunker Hill & Sullivan Corporation
control" as he calls 1t.
Claims Credit for Sewerage System.
Mr.. Hutton had the effrontery to
stand before Kellogg audience and
elected to the council that the city was
able to install a sewerage system. He
also said that the present council was
elected to combat Bunker Hill & Sulli-
van domination of Kellogg affairs.
Mr.. Hutton knows better. He knows
that C. W. Simmons, mayor Of KEEL
logg, is chief clerk Of the Bunker Hill
& Sullivan company. and that Coun-
MI Nyo1% C1n yL tc
tendent of the electrical department.
He also knows that the Bunker Hill
company favored council composed
Of business men Of the city and that
that was why he was elected.
Bunker Hill Company Bought Bonds.
THE Bunker Hill company blocked
the sewer" said the democratic can
didate for senator. Does Mr.. Hutton
think the people of Kellogg have for
gotten that the sewerage system was
strongly advocated by +. w. Bradley,
president Of the Bunker Hill & Sulli-
van company, and Stanly A. Easton.
pie Of Kellogg have forgotten that the
Bunker Hill & Sullivan company
bought the sewerage bonds, amount
ing to 100000, after the city had failed
which It could consider? Does he be-
lleve that he can hoodwnk the peo-
pie into believing that the sewer was
put into the streets in spite Of the
company?
r. the Bunker Hill & Sullivan COM
pany had not bought the bonds Mr..
Hutton would be claiming little credit
for sewerage system in Kellogg.
Claims Paving, Too.
Mr.. Hutton Is long on claiming cred
IT. He claims credit for boosting the
street paving, but says nothing about
the long stretch of paving put in by
the Bunker Hill company without
waiting for action by the city council:
overlooks the fact that the company
furnished the sand and tailings for
the paving in Kellogg at actual cost
and omitted to refer to the neat little
commission he Is said to have pulled
down as agent for the brand of cement
used in paving.
Mr. Hutton capped the climax of his
TRADE against the Bunker Hill by say
ing that the company needs Kellogg
'perhaps It does, and It has never been
lacking in showing Its appreciation Of
the city; but the chances are that the
company does not need Kellogg half
as badly as Kellogg needs the Bunker
Hill. II is fashionable these days to
land on corporations with both feet.
but for Mr. Hutton to fly Off at tan
gent in this case appears to be case
Of biting the hand that feeds.