The Sentinel=record., 1914-11-05
CONGRESS WILL BE DEMOCRATIC
BUT BY GREATLY REDUCED MA JoRlTY OVER THE WORKING
 BODY IN LAST CONGRESS.
Majority in the House VIII Be t8, and in the Senate t4 According to the Latest Returns.

New York, Nov. 4.-Latest returns from yesterday elections indicate that the democratic majority in the house of representatives for the sixty fourth congress will be reduced to IS. The probable democratic majority in the senate will be Democrats have elected two hun dred and twenty-siX members, repub- licans, l02; progressives, 10, and so- cialists, one. Of the six missing dis tricts it was estimated tonight that the republicans and democrats might elect three each. Heaviest republi- can gains in the almost oyerwhelm- ing of the democratic majority were l3 in Il inois, 12 in New York, 10 in Pennsylvania, and nine in Ohio. Pro- gressive representation in the house was cut ten from nineteen to nine. This resulted from the general col lapse of the progressive organization throughout the country except in Cal ifornia.
 In the Sixth California district, J. A. Elston, progressive, led George II. | Derrick, republican, by a slight mar lgn. Democratic leaders claimed the election of II. II. edomridge and Edward Keating in the Second and Third Colorado districts. The house:
 Alabama Democratic, 10; republi- can 0; unchanged. Arizona-Democrats 1 republicans | 0, unchanged.
 Arkansas I. republi- cans 0, unchanged.
 California Democrats ?, repubi- cans 8, progressives 6, unchanged Colorado Democrats 2, probably democratic ?, unchanged. Conntctcut-De Democrats 0, republi- cans 5, republicans gain ].
 Delaware-Democrats O. republi- cans l, republicans gai~ Georgia-Democrats 12, republicans | c, unchanged.
 ldaho-Democrats 0, republicans ?. unchanged
 lllinois-Democrats 9, republicans | E. progressive l. republican gain of 13 over democrats in Third, Fifteenth, Sixteenth. Eighteenth. Nineteenth. Twenty Twenty Twen tyfourth Twenty fifth, and two at large over progressives, in Tenth and Twelfth.
 Indiana-Democrats II, republicans 2, republican gain of ? in Seventh and Tenth.
 lowa-Democrats 1, republicans 10, repub can net gain of two; gains in Second, Third and Sixth districts, loss in Eleventh.
 Kansas-Democrats 4, republicans ?, probably republicans ?. democratic gain of one in Eighth district. entucky-Democrats 9, republi- cans ?, unchanged
 ouisiana-Democrats :, progress ives 1, progressive gain of one in Third district.
 Maine-Democrats l. republicans 8, unchanged.
 Maryland-Democrats ?, republi cans |, republicans gain one in Fifth.
 Michigan-Democra 9, republi- cans II. republicans gain over pro gressives in Tenth and Twelfth dis tricts.
 Mnnesota-Democrats 1, republS cans S, progressiyes l; progressiEes gain one.
 sissippi-Democrats s, repubh- cane n rpphouyad
 Democrats 14, repubi. cans 0, unchanged.
 Montana Democrats ?, republicans 10, unchanged
 Nebraska Democrats 8, republi- cans 3, unchanged.
 Neyada-Democrats o, republicans 1, unchanged.
 New Jersey-Democrats 4t republi- cans ', probably democratic one; re publicans gain in Second, Fourth, Eighth, Ninth and Tenth districts.
 New Mexico-Democrats Q. repub licans 1. republicans gain one.
 New York-Democrats 20, republi- cans 21, progressives l. socialists |. Republicans gain 12 in Fifth. Ninth. Tenth. Eleventh, Twentieth, Twenty fifth. Twenty Twenty-eighth, Thirty third, Thirty-seventh, Thirty eighth and fortieth.
 North Carolina-Democrats 9, prob ably republican 1.
 North Dakota Democrats O. repub- jeans 3, unchanged.
 Ohio-Democrats 10, republicans 12, republican gain g in First, Fourth. Eleventh, Fourteenth, Sixteenth. Nineteenth. Eighteenth and Twenty second districts Oklahoma Democrats 6, repuhli- cans 2. republican gain one in First. Oregon-Democrats 0, republicans I2, republican gain I over progress | ives in Third district.
 Ptnnsylvania-Dem ', repub. | licans 29. republican net gain 10 over democrats or progressives in Fifth, Sixth, Eighth. Twelfth, Seventeenth, | Twentieth, Twenty-third. Twenty fourth. Twenty-eighth and Thirtieth districts and two at large; loss to 1 d F, us,.,rt,- f{eth