The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1914-04-19
NOVEL POINTS OF THE LAW.

s, " VI. pp.,',' =, -,
supreme Nour. III su'ilVah VS.. n'"u',''
et al, III when inc court wfites 'ne ioi-
'o ,,, .! nuous.
Wnere u purchaser OF uaVeiers cneeNs
'vses ,nelh anu 'ne 'lnuer iolses we p..
cna"or counter Henature anu cuisines t"c
creeks anu the ISSUING bankers pay tue'''
Wphout ac.uai hotlce OF inc loss when
presenteu ny an indorsee they 40 not
.neIsoy oiscnarse themselves oi uc.r ~
aoiiity 10 me original purchaser o! the
tor 'heIr race amount ana 'he
ialIure VI tno custo'he. 10 give no'ioe OF
ms ioss' or oohu OF indemnity, ID no
uelehoe where 'ne forgery IL unoisputeo
ana tho checks arc IN the hahds OF the
ISSUING oahkers az the tine the action Is
orousn1 reiation coghate 10 tha' OF
depestor ana banker exists between the
parues 10 the travellers checks coun-
ter signature on the travellers checks
must De treated AS the ordinary indofse-
men. OF pnyee upon an ordinary check
payapie 10 order. ana IL IN ths second
signature which gives the check maj cur
rcncy.'
The highest court or Oklahoma has Just
decided In Holloway vs. Mccormick that
murder OF his wife. who died without
leaving WIZ as a result or which he
became her heir. The court said:
1t does not appear from the record
that the husband, Leonard Mccormick
murdered his wife for the purpose OF Sc
curing her property. IL does not appear
that the desire 10 possess her property
was In his mind or In any way induced
the crime. II VIII be observed that the
statute OF descent makes nearhess OF re-
latlohshlp 10 the uecedeht ana not inc
character or cohduct OF 'he he'r me con
ironing FACTOR as 10 me rlsht OF Ii'heri'
",Ve' ins NiIii''lai Noue ~ ''tcs pe'
allles TOT hoii'c'ucs anu otneI crimes anu
the loss OF lhherlthole quahty OF the LOT
Ieltcre OF an esta,e IL NOT among tne
penalties prescrioeu IN the eoue Al we
shou.o noio ina. the loss OF nor sup an"
the 1ofAeitu.e VI "ii es'"'e "c'" .onsv
quehee vi MIN ci,,e We "ou,u
We No,npeHeu W ,shO'e VIC 'osis'a.No 'u'v
governing VIC uescehl oi propery anu
w., wou'u III enee' nnpos' pu,'Se s,, vi
ms ul"e va aua,''on w u.a' y, s.,,a,a
penalies LOT v'o'al.ons Oh INV. AsaIh
auo' s 49," "a e .t,,t
rIess! .o' o'uu" W nc , VI
1ne ol".y' w"'1n p'o''ueS '.a. ~ s
'Nsio,. ..i"" "o'n VI ooO
vi io''e''''e VA es'"'o
~. A.. a,a,,, ..u,
oi VIC - a 81
Iar's tna' uanCIns mas "'.' sueu wy
A. lies ..a..- 4 ~.
I,.a' '''e .aNSo 60
s'v " ,I'o'aH'.' 30" -
",is'"'
Juu'''"i i.N'e va 80 ." Wv
oaine, anu We s"a', -" 'oI
request iIoin we p,"',." WI" NV ou'.
coshes VI! ioi ~ a. ~ :
reaches the triai s,aEe' N''t ne We "
'nlt'eo 70 eNh'o'' VIC ui"'e 'e'oIe t"'
court ror tnIs 'pOSe t"e 1"iS'ns MS ms
Ter wiz uouotiess sei'ct CuuP'e sum
cieh.is 'utP' ~ sNe an a. U.s., "i'u -
repIoachau'e pei ''l"'Ve' - 'he hIe"
blshop Is Wen adNlseu ne VIII! INSIST thaI
,he court INFORM Itsei upon we suoJrc'
py WISH "Coei''to 10 IL" Vi tne
far'siah cares anu ua'se mans "ntre .ne
tango hnds It's congeniai naoItat Judging
these py theF c'uh'''par's on inns hiu'
OF me water Nis't 10 theH' may mo-
dispose the court 10 n'u'ct the NeHeIaoI,
archblshop IN any very excessive oAin'
ages.
Soche years aso' WIRES .. r. LAWS o'
the lndiano'a 'Miss' par IN the FEBRUARY
case ana comment tnat CITY throueh mel
Mayor ana BOARD OF Aldermen enacted
certain ordinances uec'arIhs among othti
thihes that from anu AFTER udte II shou'o
De Cnia"!ui ior any morse !huIe' cow noI
or otheV i've s'orh 10 run at large "itl!f
the corporate hu!ts Oh SAD Town FOL
instance II country co" sho"'d iedN'
her happy rufdI nome anu wander ann
lessiy INTO the t.'E 'ih!ls "'-no"' an es
corr sue hau N'oia ca Guy oid'lh''e ah'
was suoJtt' 10 o.Ihs 500 10 t'e "'rHes
ana otsl oiutt ioi cASh 10 sbpedse me
ihaJes'! OF me IA" "".Sn sue gao W rug"
!ess.y Noddeh uhHt! lo,'' ho"eNSr' De
Tore thls cou'd De zone she must HIs' DC
IN the actudI CUSTODY anu Soh'rul OF lH'
lawful ana GUY EuaHHta hlun'tlpal GOV
chasef ana oe o! MN 'lNp"u''''u ana "a
'er'iseo lot SAFE ACCORDING 10 Jaw, ana !
was not uhcoiHhon LOT country GO"
wheh escorted D! ms o,'S'dl 10 maxi
poIi oash .oT H'ci'S al" 0''' MN 10 ''''
maticaI'y ceased
me writer sd'u tl'e owners ol ue COW
res.sleu 'he IA" anu nc pte'iHe eNp.t' "'
COW lawyer one odS one OF M
cNthis reported Nhat COW OF MS t""
had strayeu away thfee years n'''i" wa
theh IN the custod! OF negro s'A'r as
lance from town sun [" recover th'
cow was rled three Tines win tne Jur!
uhab!e To agree, put nna!!E the Wil''l car
red the case 10 the Circuit Court ana 90
an order requiring the defendant 10 pro
duce the COW In court When the COW Wa
hrst hitched In front or the court hoUs'
the writer knew Al once that lie mad tn
wrong cow
This cow was on exhibition FOR thre'
days in tho court house yard waiting 70
our case to be reached on the docket whv
on the fouith day a Third party came u
claimants affidavit. which MAS not re
uFc hu ba rirn i.fa a 800 atrl "a