The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1914-11-28
APPELLATE COURT DECISIONS.
Complete List Handed Down b,
First Department Division.

The following decisions were handed
down yesterday by the Appellate Division.
First Department
Richard II. Thorne. respondent vs.. John
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered
with costs to appellant to abide event. un-
the sum OF $40 900: in which event the judg.
ment as 80 modified and the order appealed
Settle order on notice.
Christofero Maumuzza, respondent vs.. l..
Judsmen, and order affirmed with costs
No opinion. order nled.
Mrsu M Msgso ct G syd
order affirmed with costs No opinion.
sarah G. l.. Reed as Excr. &c. appellant.
vs.. y Y. Central Il Hudson River Railroad
Company: RESPONDENT. Judgment affirmed
former appeal G23 App. p'v.. 22S. order
Trustees Of the Presbytcry Of New York.
! respondent. vs.. Westminster Presbyterian
| church Of West Twcnty-third street, ct al,
| appellants. judgment reversed and COM
I plant dismissed on the authority OF West
| minister Presbyterian church. &c, rs. Trus-
se;v o: the !rres,by,e5Ty Of NsM York 'sil
! Westminster Presbyterian church Of West
d," ,n ,hlTd street sppeiitn, vs. Trustees
/ order denying motion FOR judgment on
p!eadinss affirmed; order granting motion
/ {" serve supplemental answer reversed and
motion denied opinion per curtain. orders
Trustees Of the prcsbytery OF New York.
. respondent Westminster PresbyterIsn
church % West Twcn'y.third street. I'M
dismissed wi,h5i, costs s. opinion. order
MEG ,,,.. ..... .,,
Company of New York city respondent
/ order reversed with costs aud verdict re-
| insthiei. No opinion. Settle order on no
David crow. appellant VS.. II. Dudley War.
HAITI NJ rs Spni f@spo oIesr H.d
costs 10 opinion. order rai nle S'"Fmed with
Harilaus Economidy' rpspond.n, q,
S S0S o; j vs.,s ct A. appellants Judrmen,
Order MED. nun '"'' WIZ" COSTS 40 opinion
affirmed Win Go.ts ~ opinioi "'. pem,
In the matter o, Ann, y p-,,.r,.. =.
,c,.cd p@Irrc .r'Nincl y" ~ H,''" WING e.
''ii" in The S Giiy Of Sew York r,,r.r .
tfc :4 Es"sF,l,n, oy.Tai.i amt ao, l@
ment ordered ~ H.. n M.,n 'C %, eng ,1tg
I 1871, IN 2F G %, Ntw YORK ~ uearst 3, App
a aySsI opinion in same eas. Settle
'f1 rnv on ao'' p.conc. ,on,,n, ,.......
Iudemen, snd ESchsnFg nnng gS,Ponden
:, Hsfoid Z. Ahihony.,, ' appellant vs.. Ma,
r m%sni'F III a., Fesponirnt. order re
| Ht.a.,
Jic! MN Nh H,recteI Tor p,alnun on ,hg yer
| n"tic. -" ''''N' ~ opinion Seti' ORDER or
Tho Public Ranf Of New York city. re-
fpoimdeni, vs. Louis london e. al. appc.
sum o. from A G' "'r' lila u 5S
spondent 80 op!nioa. settle order OF
, mn r,..,,, s,,.,,.,. ,. 49,. ,.,..
New York respondent Judgment and orde
a ainiGIi"ed' VII" costs. 80 opinion orde
lap, Inc .onm1n1Me'tPih ~ ken'n.ky, appel
s .Smn 'Jtrtss T. MSrr.u 'cmp3ny -
, 10 opinion ' o3i~r d,e st"'''"''' WIN 'o'''
| Norris IS,artH ,'t,,, ,.
; vs. tho civ of New VAN annsi, !.
! / n,nt ana or,iar .nlr,,eG "ppPth, ''",. gu, jung
! opinion NcI.,,,s,,Iuln,' n e1' Mnn '2st' y
= sertiug order aied ""' NJ %. ~. as
r church Extension Commute, Of IN. Pro.
CIV Of N.NN' "Yo41RSrN sp In"cIP"H'en' - tn
and order Affirmed Win costs 80 "pirior
/ order Ned
,. Della Kel!v, ns administrator. respondent
D.. Iaasmen' 41l order aarmed, w.'SS ees,s' :
dissent I npon ne ground that piain;in'
n interstate voluntarily placed himself iu 'h
:. sgalns, nc protest Or. defsnian,'s w." "9
p"srcS. AMI thereby voluntarily assume
- any riik pg.au,r oi me ,5.iliions O., ia
;, h'ei II r.,,. .-,,.-.
CIV nr'ny Nv ISVn oTk oSa2pr''ani rs n
- reversed spS ns "" ..SSpornnarn, JUhgmri
Al 10 appeuS Sni t Na,a %rgcfea, MIN cost
r. curiefn McIsughiin auf ,V",,.''4 y,
dIssputinr sst,F. n"tar 80, 49, u.s. ~ d
10 Mor1s pf,cIl.r "I%sfl on ",eG pac, y.
y Company OF New Y0rk r.tnondan, Trt,
" ment and order affirmed with costs
opinion. order ned.
The People. &C. respondent We Elvar
Mendel appellant. Judgment and order a
hrmed. No opinion. order ui"d
Frederick 5 Taggart. Individually and .
D. executor. Sc, appellant. y, Francis pra2
o. 90. 81 al, respondents. order affirmed VIZ
"a SO costs ami disbGT,emcnls on tho opn.o
20 or Lehman, - al special Term with lea'
- TO plaintiff 20 serve amended complaint
Il payment OF costs IN ms court and IN II
~ court below order hru
II Ellen IL Il"rh an lh'hn' &C. responaon
ar vs. simon VI. llat appellant. JudEms
a. and order aH!rmed WIN costs No opinio
20 order Med -
* car bode, respondent VS. Panama RAJ
10 ROAD company sppeutnt judgment ar
~ order leVerse1 ana new tria' ordered WI