The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1914-06-29
COURT CALENDARS THIS DAY.
NEW YORK COUNTY.

Supreme court-Appellate pivision-Re-
supreme Court-speciai TermmPart f%
Before Weeks. Litigated motions-No. /,
schiene!ln VS.. McClellan; .. Thompson vs.,
Mckone w. same; 5. matter OF Concrete
Products: 6,Rishell VS.. Meany; 2, Archer VS.
city OF New York; S: Hedden & Sons Com
New York and Long Island Railroad: 10.
sohoenman VS.. Lausser; II. Weiss vs.. Weiss;
vs.. Meng; -, scharfman VS.. Brill & Kapian
Company; 10. People VS.. Baker; &C. People
vs. Henerman; IS. Keith VS., cowen; 10,
Jerseman vs.. Rosenberg: 20. Ducas VS. Levy:
S III Flynn VS. city Of New York ;::, Gron.
e. Warner Godfrey Company VS. Triangle
MM sIsr: 10 n M.iI ". Benyen Realty e.
Hermanson vs.. Hamburg American Line: rs,
warheld vs. Press publishing; 20, I.Ibman
dening vs.. Western Union Telegraph: 80.
matter Of Husson; -. matter OF Donohue;
water: IS; mater OF city q New York;
schweinlsr Press; ii. schub vs.. same: y.
kaplsn VS.. same; 80. matter of Rosenberg:
-, Rem w. Baker; -, Napoiis VS.: La
Ruser or Davenport; as, Ferrone VS., Fer
rome; ~: matter of storm; so. Drew VS.. Cole
Tr.; So. Magtener VS. sehweInler Press: 50,
Seaman VS.. Guardian Trust; o. Fiorsheim
vs., Wa5ner; 55' GOids,ein vs. Interboroush
Richardson; 81. matter OF Calm; IS. matter
of Bohne Mclaughlin Company: SO. matter
81. Davis vs.. Zimmerman: SO. matter OF
g. Neus:hotz VS., Nen.chotz; s5. STANDARD
Mail order VS. Kaufman; sc. matter OF
Marshall; 81, matter OF same; IS, United
States Trust Company vs.; Roedels; 50, Hol-
1!o1 s Fs r. H. H. matter matte Of NSersins
e. Held, VS.. -Msssurl: q. MeLaushlin y::'
Goidesmsn VS. Goidesman; ~, Solomon VS..
story: IS. Tarbeli VS.. Pure Water Apparatus;
chen Improvement: so. Atkins VS. Trow.
bridge; 81, Robinson VS.. Mcknight: So.
Mutual Life Insurance VS.. Hudson Building;
Dillon; IS. Brauer VS.. Lawrence: So, Emf
gran. Indau,,rial SAVINGS Bank vs. same:
= %si as,sir 'ssgssi%&;' d. s ss%s'
's and II isss Rs sss, Rssy e. Weir
VS.. Henes; 81, Marsh VS. Ward; eb. Hebron
vs.. Delmonico; SO, Fulslone Us. Whitehead;
NJ, Works; 80, Sacks VS., I.iss; 100. czorney
VS.. Czorney; lOl, De Gratresse vs., DE Ora
pssIs: 'Ss ssms Ws same. same &c TO-. z vs.
ys GsrstsIo lO7; People vs.. yon sIsneynski:
Real Estate security; los matter or Indus
trial Savings and Loan: 10. Kenning vs..
Kenning; III, Eckstein VS. Doebeli. lie.
Forest VS. Hamburg american Line; Tia,
Wolfe vs. Watts; ia, Kramer vs. Kramer;
rs, Jacobson VS.; Jacobson; ll6: Mackey vs..
Stannard; III, Grabelsky vs., Union y. II,
Works; IFS. Chandler VS.. Chandler; lle,
same VS.. same: 100. Kindgen vs., Craig: l2i.
Mcdonald VS. Mcdonald: lee, Poolin VS..
Pashin: 1913, winderman VS. Biit,nan: l?t,
matter OF Pabs, brewery: 1875. pux VS.. Spiel
berg: l:e, silberberg VS.. cragan; ls7 Citi-
Gems Savings Bank We. Henley; ies matter
o. commonwealth Truss; 100. Banaue G. de
Paris vs.. Liebm ann 100. matter OF city of
New. York; 1si, matter Of Rubans; 1872,
Kaufman VS.. Reisman; 1873: Hsdlsy vs.. Had
Bright; is5. National X, const vs same;
1876, matter of Humiston: 1877. Faik vs.
Ackermasi iss. Gavesty VS. Beitsiman; 1879,
simpson G. Corporation VS.. Kinder; $40,
Trustees OF Presbytery VS. Westminster p
Church; ~. Weisbereer VS. Wolf lee
Rosenberg VS.. caro-: l+3. Central Trust va
Ham,in; ia. People VS.. white; las. People.
etc. Herman vs. woolman: TAG. Rosenberg
vs. jacobson; l%7, Jacobson vs. Jacobson.
Supreme Court--Special Term-Part IL
Before Greenbaum. J, Court opens at 1880
A. NJ. FIX parte matters.
SurroEate's Court--Cha mbe rs-Before CO.
halan. S.-wnls for probate. Al 1880 A,
M.-Rertha A. Nonnenba cher, Mary T.
Prendersast saiiie Colgate. william T, MID