Corpus Christi caller and daily herald. [volume] (Corpus Christi, Tex.) 1911-1917, 1914-01-23
JUDGE HOPKINS SUSTAINED
hepslLis Govt Sus,sins oscialon ~
pistfic, Court ~ Noted
Hre~nssilis Case

Tho court ~ ritu Appeals ai fnn .
Antonio haH Sustained che decision ~ .
psstuoi luig, W 70 iiopslna in the
o.hiasi nf tho maboralif ~ nr""n7
shla rhe following 10 nom ih' Kan
Anianu lfhi
Tha f0urlh CoHri uf rtn Appeals
In au anInlun shirh chooses with
s.sihins Remuneration - ihe mnds ni
haliiua ihr rrrrnt muni'ipsl 'l'f
uan Boa nfsWnssfhs wr'n' HdaN
mofnlne reversed ua fofmff iol .sini
800 thr onnc 90 a o. cnis ~ tftiH-
.aiaf i.omn DnDoilnl ami heih ihHf 'hf
election No. so far aH b. aypiisi "a th'
mayors umce WIS nun snl void fna
thai % nos eireuon fof mayor wopl ;
hn,e to bo called hi tho eit, cpunfii
Ths court drruned a. bold fha' Doc
entIfs ,l,orbn was nuli and void 30
tins oui ihal " uch d. lsl'n we've
mado % would moan the vustiHg trem
oniro &c 600 other elected cit nrihiH
ana woaild lcayv Hggwrs,tlic win
ont ans citf entefnmsnt in i.s uFi
ruling made aeyers! wA,ln h.u lhs
court hoid thHt ths AUSTEN ri ~
Cameron county ought ie hpN' irsis
mated which contestant Fnir 0r q shn.
uul ~as entitled 90 ths oinee 10
present decision b. that nriiau ~ en.
uu.d tu b. and thhi ths voters have
io shunar another mtynH
osnouness ms,Nod % Election.
rhr nov opinion h Chief iusi~'
W "a 3D. eundemna iu unmcauurch
,rsns tho mannyr nf .snlutilrs ths
st eIeN.M az nowrtgtd I'm th'
pieaainsa ANA Testimony hfnughi pH
ffum tbc dsulct cnHrt
I'VE have urvcf knowuT SAWS lut.
uco Flys opinian "a more ne.g.ni
dlsruaard ~ tns rlshta ~ The ci'Ui'r'
than mat Witch characterized ,ir ei'e
lion lea question Tho s,rr0I, oi 'h'
ballot WAS DESTROYED ani ih, adA.l rn'
10 the alnereni fsctlons vas torerd q,
ptn,iaim the ticket nr Nould vote ri
~earns hc eoiors ~ his clan an,
then she, were irt mte the NotI
booths one az a time irsi from pn'
ean,pnn, snd ihvn from enethrr
lasss number we're dl.lfAnshlsvd b'
noi tsine provided with sufficient s"t
lne nnoina. Dt hN ha,ing ohherfs q
election $40. tlmr and arAin haiie'
tht voting tn iudulEr 900 uusssanN
NtanrlinE and disputes q wN' esN
been lho cu.t..N Ia hsii slsstsons a
Q inls was itsia bat tho cour, stne has
lrloi eumi az ufpWns,ls.l pFop,'y de
ridrd thst suVh vusig'p rVpld no
boo entertained a. iusllt ats iha
made thy rlsnts of VOTERS a p'h'thln
fcr the election eHnreFs, and fcnderc
a, tho sleyuon solemn faroa
90 sueh m1d, of elssiion be- th
I, castamar, nnr liz tho ciN ~ nrovrs
!, willie. the daN IL ripc for chanE
4. raeuons shoulA nos pr allowed to "a
thru followers with rcd or blue rit
b, aons. but voters should cous 90 %
n p,,ils when thes sa desife ana la
IA their ballots without pro- Admins
t, tac u,,rii frr wnem ters intcrA
- vote rherr can ~ prthins Nkln
IA purity and fsrness et election nnd'
"A Wha, appellant ~ouah, 40 show wAs
,o v,stom approved ~ slms and eusio
m itrowns,tlle.~
ih Nuns Case u oismsssd.
srhe appellate eoDss also declnra
a take iorl.iictien IN ire case whcrs'
a. cgfisn taxpayers q Refugio are sesl
,u inr to Gust thfVe sisters ~ Mcr
al trom ttaehlne IN che pebHc soAeols
that town andcr a,iexotiops that ~
n, are conducting seetAFiaa ~aool n
opinion hy Associate iusilee } y ca
nolds that the ,aNps, sr~ sAouia ~
al che state eoari q eia'Asnn with ghs
aa ocmr aint and ,aas he dissr's' isd
had No lseal risht 10 take iorlsti