Little Falls herald., 1914-02-27
DISTRICT COURT IN SESSION.
COURT CONVENED MONDAY WITH
JUDGE PARSONS ON BENCH
-SIXTY-TWO CASES '

= District court opened Monday after
noon at O'Clock, with Judge Parsons
Of Fergus Falls on the bench. Very
little work was done Monday except
to check up the cases and set some for
trial. The following cases were dis
missed: ..r.. -~s-,.
Albert Argan vs.. Alfred McGregor
and Mary McGregor. ..,-: s.
Joseph Schmolke VS.. Anton Ubl.
Joseph H. Grell VS.. Paul Pischka,
John Held, garnishee. /.
State Of Minnesota vs.. John Richter.
State of Minnesota VS.. s. w. Jacobs.
State of Minnesota VS.. 8. w. Jacobs:
State Of Minnesota vs.. G. E. Seeley.
State Of Minnesota vs.. G. E. Seeley.
State of Minnesota vs.. G. f.. Seeley.
State of Minnesota vs.. James Frank.
State Of Minnesota vs.. Regina krzan
and Andrew Dlugi. r.. - ..- ,
State Of Minnesota vs. Regina hrzan.
State of Minnesota VS.. Frank Lepin-
ski.
The state Of Minnesota VS.. August
Smuda. s..s
. Victoria .Jaskowiak Tvs. Theodore
Rosival. ... ~ ~ j., .
The cases Of j. Shipman VS.. G. A.
Anderson and&of Joseph Worzallis and
Stephen II. Worzalla, co-partners as j..
Worzalla g Sons VS.. Charles L. Ora
yitz have been settled out Of court.
The cases of Lena NJ. Bruening VS..
Anton Bruening and John Lepinski
VS.. Jacob Duscher, which were sched-
uled for the first part Of the calendar,
were placed at the end and will be
among the last to be tried. -..
The following cases have been con-
tinued to the next term of court
Stanislaus Jaskoviak VS.. John Wotz-
va.
Walter Novak, Frank Novak and
Caroline Novak VS.. Gustav Hoffman.
Albert Knada VS.. William Hartwig.
State of Minnesota vs.. Berger Lar
son.
On Tuesday the court took up the
applications for naturalization. Eight
applications have been made but only
FIVE were granted. One application was
delayed on account of mistake in the
first papers, one applicant failed to
appear and the third has not yet been
heard. Those who were granted final
citizens papers were Kettle Olson,
John Benson, Meyer Sherman, Johann
Hank and Victor Vincent Siegler.
The grand jury finished Wednes-
day morning and made it's final report,
after which it was discharged.
The case Of J. A. Beard VS.. Peter
Larson was taken up Wednesday morn
ing. The action was for the recovery
of money which the complainant alleg-
ed was due his client, Mr.. Wilderson,:
for sthreshing. The. case went to. the
jury Wednesday afternoon and in the
evening verdict was returned in ia
vor of the defendant. Defendant held
that the money had been paid but had
never been credited on the account.
The jury returned a verdict in favor
of the defendants Thursday morning
in the case of Gust Lindgren, ST., VS..
John J. Peterson and Hannah Peter
son. The action was for payment Of a
commission on sale of real estate.
The case Of z. O. Montbriand VS..
j. c. Waller was argued yesterday
afternoon. This case is an action for
damages alleged to have resulted from
breach of lease on real estate and
personal property. Mrs. Montbriand
had refused to sign the lease. The jury
returned verdict of 1882 in favor
Of the plaintiff.
The case of Roger Martin, as ad-
ministrator Of the estate of T. J. Mar
tin, VS.. Samuel Trebby, was taken up
late yesterday afternoon Mr.. Martin
is sueing for recovery Of about $50,
which it is claimed Mr.. Trebby owed
the deceased. ',s r.
Below is a list of the cases set for
trial for the next few days. These are
only jury cases, as the court cases
come up for trial whenever convenient.
The list is as follows:
February q
A. B. Trebiatowski vs.. Frank Pie
trus.
Mrs. Jennie Weatherby VS.. Randall
State bank of Randall, MINI. j f.
Rice State ban|, corporation, VS..
Frank Starr, German State bank Of
Pierz, garnishee.4 = :.
Herald Printing company vs. W. G..
Foster. - ssa' = T.. -
,4.-. 10, y4-,~ February q .= -. .,,s
John Dombovey VS.. Joseph Boser.
March
. Lucille ". Campbell vs.. Robert W..
Campbell. $z@a q s2' q ~ ~
State of Minnesota vs.. James Sulli-
van.
j. Vence Lyshik VS.. John Lyshik.
, Simon Minchow vs. John aLyshik. u
s G. Rosenmeier, as trustee Of the es-
tate of Armstrong Implement COM
pany, bankrupt, vs.. J. N. Carnes and
E~~