Oxford eagle. (Oxford, Lafayette Co., Miss.) 1876-current, 1914-12-03
CIRCUIT COURT
PROCEEDINGS

On the lASt Cay o. -ne Two week
term. Judge Mahon kept the
lawyers and all parties in interest
at their post and large amount
Of business was finally disposed
Of. One misfortune was the fact
that the iuries could not agree:
there were three mistrials the first
week. All this, Of course. will
have 70 be gone over another term
The following shows the DISPOSE
ton made Of the docket:
Mexico Land and Security Co..
vs. 3 Burden. on note. ristrial.
John Vessels VS. r n McElroy.
all settled. but cont. for costs.
Oxford Oil Co. VS. I. c. Ry. cont.
w. T. Harrison VS. American
Express Co.. verdict for 81.
SAMSON VS. viii Booker. YER
dict for pltf.
VIM Spears vs. I c Ry.. cont
Hurdle Bros. VS. c Ry.: cont.
J Oeister IS University. cont
3 T Mzrkette VS. T z Brown.
settled.
AW Johnson VS. Jno Koran. set.
c J Watson VS. Ollie Griffin.
passed for adjustment of costs pltf
recovered horse
Wa Steinbeck VS. Il C Ry.. cont.
Or A C Bramlett VS. &c Ry.. cont.
City Oxford VS. NJ a Greene. ct
al. back tax on University lots con
Walter Sullivan VS. r W Wind
ham. cont.
! " Shsarer VS. c Ry.. cont.
Ro5t Mcintosh VS. Mitchell Col
Inns. cent
Stewart Gwynne. Co. VS. J I
ShinauIt ct al. verdict for $4,000
Arthur Watts VS. n & J Fried
man. cont
60 Davidson VS. Paul Ramey.
et Al. judgement for Diff.
go Davidson VS. Paul Ramey
ct al. cont.
Mrs Helen Bond ct al VS. II Z
Groves. settled
Guile Butler vs. I c Ry.. settled.
S IN Parhan VS. Board Snpervi-
sors. continued
II G and D King vs. 2. NJ.
Showers. continued.
Lula Sanders VS. Home Mutual
Fire Ins. Co. judG. for pltf.
Marion Lane VS. City Of Oxford.
Iudg. for pitt. for $500
w VI Purvis VS. : : Roeucx.
MistriaL
Mrs Sue Murry vs. r Kilgors.
Continued
W Rodgers VS. s Frierscn. SET
So. Eng. ard Boiler Works vs.
J Harkins. cont
J H Roy vs. c Ry.. cont
Palmer Sewers Co. VS. E c Dick
sy. iudg. for pitt.
Bank Of Oxford VS. T 3 Robson
.intinued-
Adeline Thompson e. a. VS. Tn.
Hoodmen Ben. Society. cont.
! T Webb VS. United Firesides
America. settled.
II Hart VS. | C Ry.. cont.
: c Dooley VS. c Ry., nistrial.
Columbus Stokes VS. &C Ry..i
ont.
Mrs Ona Martin ct a. vsIC RI.
ont 5 cases.
Calvin Lott VS. Geo Hines. cont
Lonnie Sertin VS. | c Ry.. cont
Capt Natl. Bank VS. ! A Coffsy.
cont.
H Hair vs. J r Harkins. cont.
J D Peacock VS. W p Dicksrson.
:cnt-
Riverside Bank vsJA Leathers
It al. settled.
Mrs LIlis Hamilton ct a. VS. u
a. cont
Geo Jameson vs. z Il A icher.
cont
III Matthews VS. C Ry.. cont.
6 S Miller VS. CIone Refining Co.
judgment for pltf.
Taylor Mere. Co.. VS. VI Ienk-
i1s. cont
Mrs Dave Baker vs. ! 3 Walker
cont
60 Davidson ct al vs. S II Plan.
cont
e o Davidson VS. ! C Kisner,
cont
60 Davidson vs. r and J 1
SnInault. cont
60 Davidson vs. T ] Hsrkins
e. al. cont
&c Tarver VS. I c Ry.. cont
WI Mullins VS. z c ScGIe
iudg. for pltt. oy default
Louis Shirt IS | @ Ry.. iUds
for pitt for SIS.
IT TABOR VS. Lafayette Co. con
The case Of Stewart Gwynn
Co. occupied more than tire
days. The Purvis VS. Roouc< cas-
! took j great deal Of tine an
| there we're many witnesses.
large number CT very iuportan
cases were not reached a. al
the minor cases onN being THE
; and some of than involving vsr
} small amounts. About ~ case
. were finally disposed Of.