The Hartford republican., 1913-10-24
UNJUST TAX Law
IN KENTUCKY
How Unsatisfactory the Pre-
ent Tax System Works
in This State
Most Unequal System Ever Devised
and Most Of the Progressive states
Have Abolished the Plan Used In
Kentucky.

Kentucky provides that Taxes shall
be uniform on all kinds of property"
and on the surface this seems to be
so fair the average thinker can find
no fault with it.
In practice. however. 1t has been
found to be the most unequal tax sys-
TEN ever devised. end most of the pro-
! gressive states have abolished the
plan.
Its inequalities and unfairness may
be seen from the way 1t discriminates
in certain classes Of property and ex.
plains why Kentucky seems to have
50 little intangible wealth as com.
pared with other states.
For instance. cash in savings banks
draws only three per cent interest.
gilt.edge bonds pay four per cent, real
| estate notes six per cent. stock in
some foreign corporations ten per cent,
while the tax on all is the same for
| state purposes, but varies for county
and city purposes according TO the 10
| cation.
Thus where the income Is only 5
per cent and the taxes 2h per cent
it leaves the owner only " per cent
interest, and where the income is 10
per cent and the taxes 2h per cent
the interest is ~. per cent. In this
uniform?
In some counties land 10 assessed
at 80 per cent of its value. in others so
per cent. and in others 70 per cent.
The state tax is the same in all the
counties, Is this uniform?
II an honest farmer lists his prop
trty at its fair value and his un-
scrupulOus neighbor puts lower value
on his property the former pays more
than his share, while the latter pays
less.
II the state board of equalization
raises the entire list for that county.
the honest man pays on property he
doesn't own, and yet our law is sup
posed to be uniform.
That the personally owned by citi-
Gems Of Kentucky is vastly more than
is listed for taxation is a well-estab-
iished fact; but the tax receipts don't
show it. In fact. certain classes of
property, such as stocks, bonds. notes
and cash have almost disappeared from
the tax rolls, and these evidences OF
wealth apparently grow less each year
II the present system is allowed to
remain in force. il will result. as 1t has
in other states. in almost all kinds OF
personally disappearing from the as
SCISSORS books. and lands and houses
which can not be hid or moved will
have to bear the chief burden
1t has been so in every state where
the general property tax" has been
the plan on which property was taxed.
and most of the states have been wise
enough to get rid of such an unequal
and unfair system.
The Ohio state tax commission. in
It's 1908 report on the operation of the
general property tax" says:
"It is a failure for purposes Of rev.
enue or equality. Perhaps not per
cent of intangible property is listed.
It Furnishes the honest II rewards the
dishonest. II frequently results in
double taxation and lowers the stand |
ard of integrity"
The entire revenue Of the state OF
Kentucky is about $1,000 900. while
Michigan. with about the same area
and population. receives Sl4.o00.000 |
from taxes, only a small proportion of |
which is paid on land.
In Pennsylvania there Is no state !
tax on farms or homes.
There are 100000 acres Of unlm- !
proved farm lands in Kentucky and |
yet vast quantities Of farm products |
have to be imported.
There are about twenty-five thou. F.
sand square miles of coal lands In .
Kentucky, and yet we buy millions of |
tons of coal from Pennsylvania. West /
Virginia, Indiana and Tennessee.
Kentucky raises thirty-eight per
cent of the tobacco crop of the United
States and manufactures only three
per cent OF 1t.
These are significant facts and our
people should consider them.
There may be other causes for our
lack of progress but it is an estab-
lished fact that no state has ever
prospered under the general property
tax and 1t is also known that this de-
plorable system OF taxation has always
driven out capital. retarded develop
ment and caused untold losses in pop
ulation.
The last general assembly passed
an act amending the state constitu-
tion so as to permit future legislation
on taxation which will go far towards
remedying the evils and 1t is the duty
of every citizen In the state to vote
for the amendment at the November
II 1t is not ratified at that
time II will be impossible to vote on
the question for another Ave years
and It has been delayed too long al
ready. 1t Is time for us to wake up
and get in line with Othar nroanarous