The Richmond Virginian. (Richmond, Va.) 1910-1920, 1913-12-17
NATIONAL
BISCUIT
COMPANY
Always look for that name

hciously lure her back from her we'd
ding tour and separate her from
plaintiff Such telegram must have
been sent with the knowledge or be-
lief that the same was false and for
the purpose of producing such sepa-
ration; or
b. That such defendant prejudiced
the PLAINTIFF wife against him by I'M
true and malicious statement made
for the purpose of producing such
separation; or
G That such defendant excited in
her mind hatred. Ill will or contempt
for the plaintiff by some false and ma
licious statement, made 70: the pur-
pose of producing such separation; or
d. That such defendant has con-
tinuously worked on the plaintiff 8
wife's mind and feelings from that
time to the present in order to pro-
duce and maintain such separation by
false and malicious statements; or
E That such defendant has con-
tinously, unlawfully and raaliciously
made false representations to her
since her marriage to the plaintiff re-
garding said plaintiff; or
F, That such defendant by means
of unlawful, wrongful, wicked and
malicious advice, Inducements and
threats. without justif1able occasion
and with improper motives, caused the
separation.
The Eamily's Position.
IL. And the jury Is instructed that
in considering and judging the state
ments and acts of the defendants on
April 25th. they must give fair and
due weight to the conditions of their
minds and feelings If they believe from
the evidence that such conditions
naturally resulted from defendants
hearing on that day OF the marriage
of the plaintiff and his wife without
any Of the defendants having been in
formed of its contemplation.
l3. The jury is also instructed that
the burden is not upon the defendants
to show that the wife was justified In
leaving her husband.
ii. The Jury is instructed that a
married woman In determining
whether or not she viii separate from
her husband Is entitled to receive
from the members OF her family adj
vice as to the proper course for her
to pursue, and II she decides to sepa-
rate from her husband, she n entitled
to receive from her family such shell
ter. comfort and assistance as may be
needed by her unless II be positively
shown or necessarily deduced from the
facts and circumstances that in so
acting the members of the family
were actuated only by malice or Ill
will towards the plaintiff.
Exemplary Damages.
Is. The jury are instructed that IL
they believe that. after the plaintiff s
wife had determined not to return to
tho plaintiff and asked for the name
OF an attorney who might be employ
ed to represent her. the defendant,
John Radcliffe, recommended and in
troduced counsel to her, such act in
itself was not improper in siew of the
relationship between the plaintiff 8
wife and himself, unless you believe
from the evidence that the defendants
or two or more of them engaged In
wrongful and common scheme with
a bad or improper motive and with
malice or III will towards the plain
tiff to separate the plaintiff and his
wife, and that this scheme was the
cause of her determining not to re :
turn to the plaintiff, and that the
recommendation and introduction o.
said counsel was a part OF and In
furtheranee of said scheme.
Is. And you are further instructed
that the law presumes that the coun :
sci and advice given by the mem
bers of her family to the wife of
plaintiff was given In good faith, and
from proper motives and honest i'm
pulses and that the burden is upon
the plaintiff to establish TO your salts
faction by a preponderance or all the
testimony sufficiently strong to over
come the above mentioned presump-
ton OF law, and that such counsel