Atlanta Georgian. [volume] (Atlanta, Ga.) 1912-1939, 1913-11-01

IL IS dtfferert In Eng
land" The formula has been re-
peated from coast to coast in the
course Of discussions aroused by
Mrs. Paukhurst's visit, What is
the "it'' which is different ir
EnglandY Somebody ought to be
able to answer.
There are variants upon the
formula. Sometimes 1t runs,
Things are different in Eng
land" and then one wants to
know what things. But when
certain influential women in this
country escape from indefinite
ness and explain their sympathy
with Mrs. Pankhurst and the
militants in a phrase which is
now becoming common, The
laws are different in England" .
man like myself. reasonably ia
miliar with British law. begs for
enlightenment
In what respect to British laws
press more hardly upon British
women than American laws upon
American women in the States
where women are still unenfran-
chised?
An Important Matter.
This matter 10 important. Here
is Mrs. Pankhurst piedgtng her
self not to advocate militant
methods in this country, and
American women pouring moGey
into her hands for the purpose Of
financing militant methods In
England, alleging as the reason
why they themselves will not be-
come militant" in America while
they want women IN England to
burn houses, wreck trains, throw
hatchets and explode Dynamite
bombs-alleging as the reason
why they should keep themselves
safe while other zomen endure
imprisonment and terture-that
the laws are different In Eng
land" 1t Is a fair question:
What lawse
With one reply the distin~
guished ladies referred to will be
ready: The divorce laws are I'M
equal and had. They are. About
this there is no dispute. An
Englishmsn can divorce his wife
for an offsnse for which she can
not divorce him. And In my view
this admits OF no defense.
Yet the explanation is easy.
The Engl'shman 10 consistent and
he has the courage-it may be,
the brutal courase-of his con-
victions. The law to which the
American man submits is better
than the mans own convictions.
1t Is the secret belief of nine out
Of ten men in America that there
is one law Of morality for men
and another for women. He con-
dones IN himself and in his own
son that which he would neither
condone nor tolerate in his wife
or his daughter. He has to sub
init to equal divorce laws: but the
average man 10 easily confident
that what Is for his wife a crime
is for himself trivial affair.
The EngIishman expresses In
his law his deep convictions Of the
generations. He holds that an
offense is q worse offense when
committed by q wife than when
committed by a husband. And so
he makes his divorce law unequal.
No Second Instance.
Yet the sense OF humor is not
extinct in America. And 1t will
not be seriously held that this in
equality in the laws OF divorce
constitutes that difference"
which justices incendiarisn1 and
outrage and recourse TO dyna-
mite bombs!
What other laws can be quotedf
UP to the present moment. in all
the utterances OF all the Ameri-
can sympsthizers with English
militants which have come under
my notice, not a second instance
has been named. Is there an
other?
The simple fact is that In Great
Britain the woman possesses po-
iitical power far greater than that
possessed in any part of America
other than the nine woman suf-
frage States and Illinois. This is
net generally known, but II 10 a
fact. And the women who profess
that they sympathize with Mrs.
Pankhurst and the militants be-
cause 'ths laws are 30 different
do not know what they are talk
ing about
Franchise laws are not the Same
in different parts of Great Britain,
any more than they are uniform
in all parts OF this county. SO A
little care must be exercised in
stating them. But broadly they
come TO this:
In Great Britain women vote in