The daily sentinel., 1913-06-28


25d5-H. 5. Price VS.. Thomas /.
Elliott Walter p. Cross, attorney
for plaintiff.
2550-The Pople on the relation
OF the Palisade Irrigation District VS..
Benton Canon. as County Treasurer,
and eN Otficio, Treasurer Of said Dis
trict. Logan q Miller attorneys for
plaintiff: Il. L. McCllut0ck, attorney
for detndant.
2553- Frank p. Tanner, as Trus-
e, Of the Estsate OF Lambert Stern
berg, Bankrupt vs. The Independent
| Lumber Co. 5. G.. McMulliu, attor-
merry for plaintiff.
2555-C. c. Jones end r. NJ Skin
ner vs., Frank ID. Worcester. insane.
ct al, Ed r. Brown, attorney for
plaintiff
25GS-The Mutual Savings and
/ Building Assn. VS.. Oryille Wilson and
Charlotte Baylis McNlullin 4 Stern
berg. attorneys for plaintiff
I 25Gs-O, o, Fellows ct al. VS.. n. A.
/ Glasco, ct al. Logan d Miller, attor-
neys for plaintiff; Griffith. Watson
& Smith, attorneys for defendant.
25T Edward $ Thomas VS.. Vic
tor A. Tharp. Burg SIS & Kinard. at
torneys for plaintiff; Griffith. Wat
son a Smith, attorneys for defendant.
2574-A. h, johnson vs. The orch
ard Mesa Irrigation District ct al.
Sprigg Shackleford, attorney for
plaintiff.
2575-Carl Stranger as admins
traitor. VS.. The U-ntah Railway Co.
Griffith 4 Watson, attorneys for
plaintiff; Vale, McAlHster & Vale,
attorneys for defendant
2517-ln the matter of the appli-
cation OF George Smith for an adjudi-
cation of his right to the use of water
from Cheney Creek in Water District
No. A . Mesa county, Colorado
25T9-The International Trust Co.
as trustee vs.. Palisade Heat q Power
Co. ct al Hughes 4 Dorsey. Wheeler
& Weiser and Barnwell $, Stewart.
attorneys for plaintiff; Morris q
Grant and Logan & Miller and George
Bullock, attorneys for defendants.
25S1-DelOs d. Potter vs.. r. H..
Bancroft and r. NJ. skinner ct al.
Fry & Welsh, attorneys for plaintiff.
25S3-ln the matter of the estate
of Squire C. Lane, deceased, appeal
from county court. Logan q Miller,
attorneys.
25S5-H. o. Kaiser VS.. Edward
Bennett and Joshua b. Freemeyer.
Wheeler 4 Welser attorneys for
plaintiff.
25SS-The Gibson Lumber & Mer-
camille Co. VS.. w. j. Darrow and II.
l.. Knox. Appeal from county court.
Griffith, Watson & Smith, attorneys
for plaintiff; McMullin & Sternberg,
attorneys for defendants.
259O-A. S. llolbrook VS.. The Wal
= lace Orchard company ct al. Wheel
er & Weiser, attorneys for plaintiff
259l-ln the matter of the People
, in the interest Of Michael Costanzc
2 ct al. Appeal from county court.
2595-The Tanner McMullin Mer
camille Co. VS.. Betsy McCarty. Me
. Mulliu & Stsrnberg, attorneys fol
I plaintiff; Wheeler 4 Weiser and w
S 4. S. May. attorneys for defendant,
2596-E. l.. Jeffars VS.. w. A
t Nessler. Appeal from county court
p Wheeler and Weiser, attorneys 70
4, plaintiff.
25g7-A. NJ. Cross VS.. S. n. Wheel
p er. Sprigg Shackleford, attorney TO
plaintiff: Logan 4 Miller, attorney
for defendant.
!. 2GOI-The People VS.. c. E. Sin
l. mons and NJ. NJ Hardison. Whe5le
+ & Weiser, attorneys for plaintiff
r. Logan 81 Miller. attorneys for deten
h dauts.
. 2GOJ-J. H. Briscoe VS.. John n
- Carr. Fry & Welsh, attorneys 70
plaintiff. Wheeler & Weiser, attot
:. neys for defendant
n 2GO6-Arthur j. Lee VS.. The Ceda
Ridge Irrigation company ct al. Nc
+ Mullin & Sternberg, attorneys TO
, plaintiff: II II. Tangenrnn, attorne
J for defendants.
!, 2GOS-F j. Baughmnn VS.. Rober
A. Orr, p. j. Cheedle, Lee j. Mors
and Frank Gispert Logan & Miller
attorneys for plaintiff