Eagle River review. [volume] (Eagle River, Wis.) 1890-1927, 1913-08-29

residue of the unexpired term
When two thirds OF the landowners In drainage
district who shall represent more than one-haf OF the
land in said district. or the owners OF more tnan
two-thrs Of the land in said district petition the
,,t For tbe removal Of one or more Of the commits
soners for any reason the court snall remove satu
commissioner commissioners from once anu S. nn
provisions OF this section shall 10 no way ADIloso
the power Of the court to remove commissioners from
onsce for cause as in section 1S793lm provided ana
shall delay the progress Of the district as n'sle -
possible.
TS lana rithn the district proposed BY the orig
mai petition or within the district q cnaneeu g
enaxred b. the report Of me
s cos.. 70 s ,oin s Is pstonsr and the
court may. b. order, permit such :. person 70
s q en- IS he had sgned the original Pc
ttion: and thereafter such owner 90
brought In shall b counted. a. an crigina! ......
NAV he signed By the Landowner or b
ia aren't authorized in writing TO SIGN SAID
owners name 5. 80, !. .,t.r
= : their organization. OF within sucn ums as
the court rnay direct said commissioners snaLs IA -
an d,stct engineer and they shall notify Sicn num-
~ ~ nualiied drainage engineers as may pe prac
cabe Of the time sd place g q sriI !, q any dime
Sa,.ant the commissioners may fill sucn vacancy. =
said time or adjournment Thereon tney sna se..s
sSs sistrlct engineer and Tx mis- compensation ana
hs,, then uroceed to all necessary levels taNen
md surveys made and shall lay out salo pIopoSeo
ma q maj map tActeos .-t-
md other specifications thereof and report az "lis
TO the court y, :. !. sorna neres-
- ~ change the boundaries Of said proposed as
49,. - l,v the petition previously hxeu
49, the commissioners shall report SAID PROPOSED
h.nr, and II possible, shall report sne names
and post office addresses OF tne owner y
,snsrs Of all lands affected by SAID cnanse Al
but no such change In boundaries shaAL 70
ssde az 70 deprive the court OF Jurisslcuo, plo Ply.
However that If the Of lands adjacen.
- tha district petition to have their iands Dtousne
" s,sfr,r. s,leh may be considered the same a.
s,aI nstitiouers in making changes IN boundaries
section 5000. Any owner Of lanes o. any ease
-, ~ interest therein within said uiss1ct o1 azS
,..o or corporation affected By the proposed "orA
1850. ale written remonstrarce nEe OF
may s..s t.efere he day set for hearing on saio
Nv = r5 therein demonstrate against TIC
as 49, ~ any part Of the proposed work OF an
49, ~ fhe boundaries Such rem0nsIra1ce snAtl
.s-sassl n AFFIDAVIT and shall set forth tne o0sc
,s ~ tho atiiant whether they SO TO the JaIasuac
sss,on ~ the commissioners OF the court OF
,hcv resi- on any other fact. as that some lanos =
are assessed too high or 700 low ~ -.
nnsriv OF that lands assessed wnlcn ousns ~
- ~ assessed or that lands or corporaloAs. $500.
fa assessed which not assessed OF INA. rss
s,orrrs to any parcel tract easement IN i1nn; =
~ any corporation are excessive q tnas ' st an.
~ sSd Yrnposed work should be changed OF tnAt Ane
os sS., n said district should be altered g g
lcr.ie or exclude certain lands OF Any psase.s
- IN s,ona to whom damages are ailoWeu Mss
- because they inadequAte Inc $3.50
sss4 Tor said county the presiding yuess 80 9
49,. a. 3 dine 81 any term Of court ~ ept1ps s
t9es- - g *-'