davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
Atlanta Georgian. [volume] (Atlanta, Ga.) 1912-1939, 1913-06-19
LIVERPOOL GRAIN MARKET,

SD lower; at 1870 p. m. the market was
SD lower. Closed IAd to sd lower
Corn opened sd lower; at l 80 p. m
the market was SD to I'D lower
Closed I'D to SD lower.
Atlanta Georgian. [volume] (Atlanta, Ga.) 1912-1939, 1913-06-19

TALBOTTON.-The Talbot County
Farmers Institute viii be held at Tai
bottom Saturday July under the aus
pieces of the State College of Agri-
culture
Atlanta Georgian. [volume] (Atlanta, Ga.) 1912-1939, 1913-06-19
MARKETS
EGGs-Fresh country, oandled. no

EGGs-Fresh country. candled, 179
BUTTER-Jersey and creamery, in
lib blocks, 271b 630c; fresh country,
fair demand, 1713 0221zc.
UNDRAWN POULTRY-Drawn. head
and feet on, per pound: Hens, 16Q17c;
tries, 221z a Csc; ROSTERS, Sa1Oc: tur-
keys, owing to fatness 17d1yc.
LIVE POULTRY-Hens. ,4o@5Oc:
ROSTERS, 30Q35c Drollers. 35c per
S5 940c; geese, 50G60c each; turkeys,
owing to fairness. 15411c.
FRUITS AND PRODUCE.
ons, fancy, $500 500; grapefruit. S2.55
@400; caulidower. 10G121Ac ID; ba-
nanas, &c ID: cabbage, $110ql75 per
crate peanuts, per pound. rancy Vir-
fancy, s200Q25 so; beets, $1.75Q2.00. in
half-barrel crates; cucumbers. 81. Esd
ESQ. Eggplanus (scarcel, S200d2,5 80 pei
crate; peppers, $2.O042.5O per crate; to-
matoes, fancy, six-basket crates, $1,000
$50; pineapples, s2.5Od275 per crate;
onions, $l.750 per bag containing three
pecks); sweet potatoes, pumpkin yams,
S0i SOC; strawberries. S410c per quart;
okra, fancy, six-basket crates, $2.0OQ
$50.
FISH.
FTSH-Bream and perch, &c pound;
snapper Toe pound; trout. 10c pound;
bluefsh, &c pound; pompano, zoe pound /;
mackerel, &c pound; mixed fish, 5@6c
pound; black bass, 1Oc pound; mullet,
$ll.00 per barrel.
FLOUR AND GRAIN.
FLOUR--Postelrs Elegant S775;
Omega, $3.50; Carriers. Best, S775; Quail
fly Finest PATENT $3.50; Gloria self
rising, S625; Results (sef-rising), S.;
Swans Down fancy patenD, $500; VIC
tory (the very best PATENT, $40; Mon
ogram, $500; Puritan highest patent)
Finest PATENT, S6.25; Home Queen
(highest PATENT, $50; Paragon (high-
est patent, $50; Sunrise (half pate1D,
$40. Whit, White Cloud thighest PATENT
$5.25; White Lily (high patentl, $5,25;
Diadem fancy high PATENT, 1913; Wa
ter Lily CpatenD, S515; Sunbeam, $3.50;
southern star patent. S.; Ocean Spray
King Cotton (half PATENT, $4S5: low
grade 98-lb sacks. SAGE.
FEEDsTUFFs.
sHoRTs-white, 1OO-iD. sacks, s1.7O;
Halliday, white, 100-lb. sacks, $40;
dandy middling, IOO-lb sacks, sI75;
fancy, 75-lb. sacks, $40; p. w, 75-lb.
sacks, S1.60; brown, 100-lb. sacks. SL50;
Georgia feed. 75-lb. sacks, $1.55; clover
leaf, 75-lb. sacks, $3.50; bran. 75-lb.
sacks, $1.3O; Homeoline, $3.50; Germ
meal, Homeo, $50.
GROUND FEED-Purina feed. 175-lb.
sacks, $40; 100-lb. sacks, S1.65; Purina
$17O; Allneeda feed, S165; Suerene dairy
feed, $3.50; Monogram 100-lb. sacks,
$3.50; Victory horse feed, 100-lb sacks,
S160; A B c feed, $1.55; milk dairy feed,
$40; alfalfa molasses meal, SITS; al
falfa meal, $40; beet pulp, 1OO-lb. sacks
81 so.
Atlanta Georgian. [volume] (Atlanta, Ga.) 1912-1939, 1913-06-19

LONDON, June 2o.-Bar silver easy
at IS 1s-16d. down Lied.
Atlanta Georgian. [volume] (Atlanta, Ga.) 1912-1939, 1913-06-19
cHIcAao cAsH QUOTATIONS.

CHICAGO. June 0.-Wheat-No. 2 red
I00QL04; No. red, 93Q9S; No hard
winter, y2MS3A; No. hard winter, 9lU
92h; No ] Northern spring, 930941a ;
No. 2 Northern spring, 91laq93; No 3
spring 90n92.
Corn-No. 2. 61A @61%; No. 2 white,
81 q a 62ia No. 2 yellow, 6tA H614 No.
3. 602s 061A; No white, 6112 d62; No.
3 yellow, 61U611a; No. 4, 59ls d6Ola; No.
a white. 60M6Olz; No. 4 yellow, 60G6O5a
Oats-No. 2, Az; No. white, 42&4 a
40; No. 3, 40i2 AL; No. 3 white, 41d42;
No. white, 400415zi standard, 41% a
4gla
Atlanta Georgian. [volume] (Atlanta, Ga.) 1912-1939, 1913-06-19
NEW YORK COFFEE MARKET.
COTTON SEED OIL

COTTON SEED OIL.
NEW YORK, June 20-The cotton
seed oil market established new high
records to-day on urgent demand from
shorts in nearby deliveries. While bust
ness was good, most of the trading was
in small lots
Cotton seed oil quotations.
Atlanta Georgian. [volume] (Atlanta, Ga.) 1912-1939, 1913-06-19

Quo yadis continues at Grand
next week. Buy seats now.
Atlanta Georgian. [volume] (Atlanta, Ga.) 1912-1939, 1913-06-19
ANcE IN MN Orleans EuruREs
PORT RECEIPTS.

The following table shows receipts at
the ports to-day compared with the
same day last year.
Atlanta Georgian. [volume] (Atlanta, Ga.) 1912-1939, 1913-06-19

Closed steady; sales l9.lO0 barrels
Atlanta Georgian. [volume] (Atlanta, Ga.) 1912-1939, 1913-06-19
CHICAGO CAB LOTS.

Following are receipts for Friday and
estimated receipts for Saturday:
Atlanta Georgian. [volume] (Atlanta, Ga.) 1912-1939, 1913-06-19

RANaE LM NV YoRk EUTUREs.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-11-11
d. A. VALENTINE,
Clerk Supreme Court.
No. 1884
The State OF Kansas. Appellee.

VS.. :.
r.. r. Moore, as Administrator. ETC., Ap-
pellant.
Appeal from johnson County.
MODIFIED.
Syllabus. By the Court. Mason, J.
l. The act creating an asylum for fee
BILE minded il held not to contemplate
charge for maintenance against the
estates OF inmates, upon the grounds ID
that 1t contains no provisions authorizing
such charges similar to those OF the
statutes regarding the care Of the insane:
(2D that it provides in terms for such
charges in the case Of non-residents. the
inference being that IL a charge to resi-
dents had been intended an express pro-
vision therefor would have been made;
and go that 1t treats the institution as a
school. and purpose to exact such q
charge at an educational institution Is
not readily to be implied.
respect to making q charge for main
tenance Is to be determined by the edu-
catipnal character of the institution as
defined by the statute. notwithstanding
that only q small number OF its inmates
are in fact capable Of receiving tnstruc-
tion.
3 Where a person Of unsound mind.
who has been an inmate Of q public in
stitution for the care OF imbeciles, IL
transferred to state asylum for the in
sane a liability for maintenance at the
latter place may attach, notwithstanding
the requirements Of the law may not have
been compiled with IN the commitment
thereto.
T. In such a case, after a re-transfer to
an institution the inmates Of which ara
by law exempt from charges for main-
tenance. no liability will be incurred, not
withstanding any trregulArity In the
means by which such change waG
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-11-11
No. IS, 5e6.
r.. r. Bean. Appellee,

John Kinseder, ct al, Appellants.
Appeal from Sedgwick County.
First Division.
REVERSED.
Syllabus. BY the Court. Porter. ].
Upon the facts stated in the opinion 1t
is held that certain remarks Of counsel
for the prevailing party in his closing
argument were improper, and that the
failure of the court to sustain objections
thereto and to admonish the jury to dis
regard the same was error which requires
a reversal of the judgment
Mason, J., Smith, J., Benson, J., and
West, J., concurring.
Johnston. c. J., and Burch, J., dissent
ing.
A true copy.
Attest: d. A. VALENTINE,
fSeal1 Clerk Supreme Court.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-11-11
No. 1903.

NO. l6,Vt5.
Caroline Treiber, Appellant
Margaret Mccormick as Admx., ct al,
AppelleeS.
Appeal from Pottawatomie County.
REVERSED.
Syllabus. By the Court. Porter. j.
1. The husband and wife are competent
witnesses for or against each other con-
corning transactions in which one acted
as the agent of the other. Notwithstanding
the fact that in the revision of the code.
Section 3d. (Sec. 5915, General Statutes
1900 there is no express provision to that
effect.
2. Section 3O7 Of the Civil Code. provid-
ing that where the ground of a motion
for a new trial is the exclusion of evil
dence, such evidence shall be produced at
the hearing. is held not to apply where
it appears from the testimony of the wit
nesses themselves given at the trial what
the evidence would have been had it not
been excluded.
Burch, j.. Mason, j., Smith, j., Benson,
J. and West. j., cOncurring.
Johnston, c. j.. dissenting from second
paragraph Of syllabus and corresponding
portion Of opinion.
true copy.
Attest: D. A. VALENTINE
(Seall Clerk Supreme Court
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-11-11
LEGAL.

company should be considered AS an agent
OF the parent company in the purchase
and Opel alton of the plant.
J. While in possession and carrying on
the business the investment company, and
the new company, enjoyed the franchises
and privileges granted by ordinance of
the city to the mortgagor, collected rates
and settled outstanding accounts with
customers upon the books, and otherwise
continued the business as their predeces-
sor, the mortgagor. had done. The new
company desired to discontinue the busi-
ness and remove the property. The dis
trtct court permitted this to be done. but
required that 1t should first give thirty
days notice of it's intended withdrawal
and repay to consumers deposits which
had been made with the mortgagor as Sc
curtty for the payment of gas bills. 1t is
held that these conditions are reasonable
In view Of the nature of the service and
the conduct of the companies so taking
possession of the property, continuing the
business and receiving the benefits.
All the Justices concurring.
A true copy.
Attest: D. A. VALENTINE.
(SeaL1 Clerk Supreme Court.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-11-11
LEGAL.
First published in The Topeka State
Journal October 81, 1871

->>~-~>~>~~~~.~%S~S
First published in The Topeka State
Journal October 81. 1871
THIRTY DAY NOTICES OF APPLcA-
rI FOR OF q p ERsIME TS S coHIEsEs
IN THE STATE OF
Topeka. Kansas. Oct. 80. 1919
Notice Is hereby given that the Salt
City Business College. Hutchinson, Kan
sas. has made application to me for q
permit to canvass in the State Of Kansas
Tor the purpose OF selling tuition In ad-
vance and contracting or securing notes
for tuition from students before their req
tstration at the business college herein
II satisfactory proof il furnished that
the above named college Is Incompetent
to furnish such a course Of instruction a.
is advertised or that the moral surround
ings of the institution are not good or
that the premises are kept in an unhealthy
condition. or that the agents Of said in
ulent methods in securing contracts, notes,
or cash from prospective students. in such
case permit will not be granted to such
State Superintendent Of Public Instruction
First published in The Topeka state
Journal November II, 1871
State Of Kansas.
Executive Department.
PROCLAMATION.
WHEREAS, on the third day Of No.
vemDer, 1918, MIS-. John Turner OF the
city OF Great Bend, Barton County, Kan
sas. was assaulted by some unknown per-
son In her home in the said city Of Great
Bend; and
WHEREAS. the brutality Of said as
sault, and the protection of women in
their homes makes it most important that
the perpetrator OF said assault be arrest
ed and punished and ordinary methods
having faileds
Now. THEREFORE, I, Geo. H. Hodges.
Governor OF the State OF Kansas. do here
by offer a reward of
TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS
Tor the arrest within ninety days from
this date. and the final conviction there
after. OF the unknown party who COM
mitted this crime: said reward to be paid
upon the final conviction of such party
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have
hereunto subscribed my name
and caused to be affixed the
Great Seal OF the State Of
ISeal1 Kansas. Done at Topeka, this
Tenth day or November.
A. D. 1913
GEO. H. HODGES, Governor.
By the Governor.
CHAS. H. SESSIONS,
Secretary Of State.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-11-11
No. 1S,3l3. =
The State Of Kansas, Appellee,

No. s,3l3
The State of Kansas. Appellee,
vs.
Thomas Madden. Thomas Redman, Ed
ward Harold and Fred Boyd, Appellants.
Appeal from Sedgwick County.
First Dfvision.
AFFIRMED
syllabus. BY the Court. West, ].
Four defendants Jointly charged with
felony were with their counsel present in
court when their case was called. The
state announced itself ready for trial
when the defendants interposed a motion
Tor continuance supported by the ami
davits Of each. After the latter were read
the court suggested that as to one Of the
defendants no diligence was shown but
that the others had raised q question
which would probably be for the jury.
The state put upon the stand witness
and examined him orally and agreed that
the affidavits Of the three might be used
as dispositions OF the witnesses named
therein. A jury was then called and
sworn to answer questions whereupon the
county attorney stated briefly the nature
OF the case. At this point one of the
counsel for the defendants, who had been
out Of the room to use a telephone, de-
tnaanded separate trial which demand
that the right to a separate trial (Gen.
Stat. 1909. Sec. 679D is one that may be
waived and under the circumstances OF
this case at the, time 1t was demanded,
severance became discretionary with the
trial court and its refusal was not an
abuse Of such discretion. =
Johnston. c. J., Burch, J., Mason, J.,
Porter. J.. dissenting.
A true copy.
Attest: D. A. VALENTINE
tSeaLJ Clerk Supreme Court.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-11-11
No. 1S.499.
State Of Kansas, Appellee,

No. 1889.
State Of Kansas, Appellee,
VI.
Appeal from Wyandotte District Court.
division %
Syllabus. BY the Court. Burch, J.
I: In prosecution for libel against
publisher who charged in his newspaper
ciety was q fake ORDER and had been
proven q skin game" it appeared that
the defendant had been defeated in a civil
it out Of business These declarations
fiectins on the y society. Held ia they were
all admissible in evidence to prove malice
and that the entire article in which the
defamatory matter occurred was also ad-
2. The report, to the superintendent of
insurance of special examiner duly ap-
pointed to investigate and report upon
the affairs Of the society was admissible
In evidence to prove the lawful character
prove s the tasty Of the p"biicetion an Conc no
planned of.
5. The trial court had the right to con-
the society within reasonable limits OF
time. The libel spoke as of May g. 1911.
and a ruling that tho parties should not
the defendants defeat in the civil suit.
did not constitute an abuse Of discretion.
The ssase Of to octobsr IL as
was shown. Its reports to the superin-
tendent of insurance for the years 1910
defendant. They disclosed no important
change in the society's condition. Held.
the reports were proper evidence put tnat
their rejection was error without preju-
dice.
S. Evidence was rejected which the de-
~ sociefv that f. Was Sn
able to conduct it's business and meet it,
obligations under its plan Of insurance:
Insurance and its ability to meet its OBJ
LEGATIONS according to that plan were pc
side the issue. the defamatory charge be,
a skin game. that is. was not what 1t pur-
porter to be but was condolences game
eecns aDd 1eo'eH Held
the evidence was not Important because
the issue Of whether or not the society
6. It was not error to refuse a requested
instruction relating to privilege when the
law on that subject wss co @n, stated s
| structions framed by the court.
All the Justices c0ncurr1ng.
| Attest: d. A. VALENTINE.
! IseaL1 Clerk Supreme Court
| No. 1s.n1.
Jesse b. Hinthorn, Appellant,
| Hugh H. Benfex, Appellee.
Appeal from Brown County.
| REVERSED.
| Syllabus. BY the Court Porter. J
| l. A narrow porch or landing OF al
the use Of Inherent tenants .of . buiidins
and connected with a common hallway, Il
part Of the stairway itself and necessarily
lord; and he h bound to exercise reason
able care to render It safe for the N,
witch he invites Others 70 make Of It
cover tbs decisive condstion 81 The lsssd
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-11-11
No. 1885.
The State OF Kansas, Appellan

No. IL, 3M.
The State OF Kansas, Appellant,
w.
Louis Soffietti. ct al, Appellees.
Appeal from Cherokee County.
REVERSED.
Syllabus. BY the Court. Johnston, C.. J.
An application to set aside a judgment
and grant a new trial presented after the
term at which the judgment was rendered
and based upon the ground that It had
been taken when there was a previous
agreement between counsel for the parties
that no further proceedings In the case
would be had can not be granted unless
the application sets forth the judgment
against the defendant and also facts
showing that he has a valid and meritor-
ious defense to the action.
All the justices concurring.
A true copy.
Attest D. A. VALENTINE,
LSeal1 Clerk Supreme Court.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-11-11

effected.
8. The statute Of limitations does not
run against the state with respect to q
charge for the maintenance of an inmate
OF public asylum for the insane.
All the Justices concurr1ng.
A true copy.
Attest: d. A. VALENTINE
lSeal1 Clerk Supreme Court
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-11-11
D. A. VALENTINE.
Clerk Supreme Court

No. 1881.
Il. w. Benfield. Executor of the Estate
Of G. w. Benfield, Appellant.
o. E. Croson and ]. G. Houser. Appellees.
Appeal from Saline County.
AFFIRMED.
syllabus. BY the Court. Burch. =
stock of merchandise to be valued
at the cost price Of each article at whole
sale was traded for q tract Of land to
winch a certain value was assigned. The
contract provided that the merchandise
Snould be invoiced and if 1t amounted to
Tess than the price placed upon the land
1ne vendor should pay the difference in
cash. If 1T amounted to more the vendee
should pay the difference in cash. The
cpn.L ,ac further provided that each party
~ tn1 1 STAKE as forfeit the sum OF $50
10 De placed in the hands Of third per-
son, and should either one fail to keep all
ana singular the terms of the agreement
the deposit should be forfeited to the
o ,.. Heid the language Of the contract
p.r,ovi,ding Tor forfeiture and not for
stipulated damages should control in the
absence OF circumstances indicating q DIR
Ierent intention; that actual damages re-
Su.r,ng Ir ;,I1. a breach Of the contract
INTO the realm of speculation and con-
1ectufe: that the amount of the stake was
T fnd without reference to compensation
LOT, LOT loss IN case of breach: and that
upon default by one party the other could
not enforce the forfeit :
~, IN an action by the vendee to recover
tne vendors forfeit from the stake holder
u one VENDOR was interpleaded in a county
1 ON than that Of his residence. After
me petition had been once amended and
atter great lapse of time the action
came on Tor trial and a demurrer was sus-
r rIHea 20 the PLAINTIFFS evidence. The
Psamnn then asked leave to amend by
cnanEng the cause of action to one Tor
1ctuaI damages for breach of Contract.
neio' IL was not an abuse OF discretion to
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-11-11
LEGAL.

deny the request.
3. A judgment will not be reversed and
the cause remanded merely for the pur-
pose of allowing the defeated party to re-
cover nominal damages.
All the Justices cUncurrtng.
A true copy.
Attest: D. A. VALENTINE
[Seal1 Clerk Supreme Court.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-11-11
No. 1874.
The State of Kansas, Appellee,

NO. B,7X
The State of Kansas, Appellee,
VS.
Jack Moberly. Appellant.
Appeal from Cowley County.
AFFIRMED.
Syllabus. BY the Court. Mason, J.
I. conviction for robbery will not be
set aside merely because an amendment
to TIE information, setting out the own
ership of the property taken, was al
lowed after the defendant had pleaded to
an original information in which such al
legation was omitted.
2. The scope OF cross examination as to
the past conduct of witness, for the
purpose of discrediting him. is largely dis
cretionary. and in this case the discretion
was not abused.
All the justices concurring.
A true copy.
Attest d. A. VALENTINE,
TSeal1 Clerk Supreme Court.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-11-11
LEGAL.
No. IS, 1864.
w. r. Smith, Appellee,

>~~~--~>->-~~~-~~~<>~~~>>
w. r. Smith, Appellee,
The Missouri Pacific Railway Company.
Appellant.
Appeal from Barton County.
MODIFIED.
Syllabus BY the Court. Smith, J.
i. When the right-of-way for rail,
road has been previously appropriated
and paid for by the corporation, ana
priated by the corporation for shop
grounds and terminal facilities, the pro
vision Of SECTION A. article II OF the sha
be made irrespective of any Depeflt from
any Improvement proposed by such cor
paton to be- pad a For such
grounds. -.
2. In such case no allowance should De
made as damages to adjacent lands NOT
taken unless such lands are reduced IN
value by the taking. of the land appro-
priated or the use to De mace snneal is
taken from the award of damages to the
district court and the case therein Is tried
allow interest at the rate of six per cent
on the amount determined upon as dam
ages from the time of the appropriation
Of the land, and include the same IN their
4. When in such case it clearly appears
terest has been Included in their verdict
and 1t also clearly appears from sucn
findings, from the admission OF the party
evidence, from what date interest should
he allowed the court may compute the In
terest and include It in the judgment.
All the Justices concurrins.
Attest: D. A. VALENTINE.
fSea1 Clerk Supreme Court.
No. 1880.
The State of Kansas, Appellee,
.r-
-.-- Joe NJ Stickler. Appellant ~
Appeal from Seward County p.
AFFIRMED.
SYLLABUS. By the Court. Johnston. c: J.
l. An allegation in an Information that
the accused feloniOusly and falsely altered
a check by adding 500 to the amount Tor
which it had been drawn ana da enat w ths
drawer sufficiently alleges that the alter
alton was made without the drawers con-
sent, or authority.
=. AS the check alleged to have been
materially altered was apparently valid
and the foundation of legal liability II
genuine, it was unnecessary to alege
extrinsic facts as to how it might have
been used to defraud the drawer:
3. The information was not defective
because it did not refer to the particular
section Of the crimes act under which the
accused was prosecuted
A. In a prosecution for altering and
forging a check the reception of testi-
mony as to the disposition which the ac-
cused made of the check was not error as
altering and forging was done with the
intent to defraud.
S. The receipt of a Photographic copy
of a paper which itself had been intro
where 1t appears that the photograph Is
a true copy of the original
All of the Justices concurring.
Attest: d. A. VALENTINE.
rSeaIl Clerk Supreme Court.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-11-11
No. 1906
Walter Ziegler, ct al. partners,
Plaintiffs,

Walter Ziegler, ct a., partners, ETC.,
Plaintiffs,
The City of Junction City ct al, De-
PENDANTS.
Original Proceedings in Mandamus.
WRIT DENIED.
Syllabus B. the Court. Mason. J.
An enrolled BILL signed by the governor
and published as statute, may be held
not to be valid enactment, where words
to its operation. are shown by the journal
Of one of the branches Of the legislature
before the bill passed that body, and
where other record evidence confirms the
correctness of the entry on the journal.
and accounts for the discrepancy between
it and the enrolled bill.
Burch, J.. Smith. j. Benson. J.. and
West, J., concurring.
Johnston. C. J., dissenting.
A true copy.
Attest: D. A. VALENTINE.
[Seal.l Clerk of Supreme Court
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-11-11
LEGAL.

the SUPPORT and maintenance of his wife
and thereby places her in such a situa-
sarfes OF lie it is not material that they
are supplied by her own labor or by
sympathiEing relatives, friends Or
suffer from the privation. He is guilty II
he leaves her in such circumstances that.
without her own efforts or outside help,
she would lack the necessaries of life.
5. The foregoing rules applicable to the
relation of husband and wife also govern
the relation of parent and child.
All of the Justices concurring.
4 true copy.
Attest d. A. VALENTINE.
CSeaL1 Clerk Supreme Court.