The daily sentinel., 1913-02-20

Weiser, attorneys for defendant
2l25-C. H. Sorenson VS.. ]. L.
Farren. Joe w. Rozzelle, attorney
for plaintiff; II. NJ. Logan and John
X. Charlesworth. attorneys for de-
fendant.
2l3S-John II. Fry ct al. VS.. l.. w.
Buckley ct al. George Bullock, at
torney for plaintiffs; Edwin n. Bur
dick, attorney for defendants.
2lS9-C. IA. Sorenson VS.. j. l..
Farren. Joe w Rozzelle. attorney
for plaintiff: r. NJ. Logan and John
X. Charlesworth, attorneys for de
fendant.
2l42-City of Grand Junction,
Colo, VS.. the Denver q Rio Grande
II. II. company. Bucklin & Tupper
and George Bullock. attorneys for
plaintiff; E. N. Clark, A. C. Camp
bell, Logan & Miller, attorneys for
defendant.
2162-John c. Cozzens VS.. Harry
A. Spencer. Griffith & Watson, at
torneys for plaintiff.
2164.J. A. Grom VS.. the V. c.
Winning Investment company. Nc
Mullin & Sternberg. attorneys for
plaintiff; r. l.. Holland. attorney for
defendant.
= - i-'tlid JONES VS.. lne tllN Ol
Grand Junction. Colo. Joe w. Roz-
zelle, attorney for plaintiff; James
w. Buclilin, attorney for defendant.
2l72-George Swazey VS.. the Dem
yer & Rio Grande X. X. company.
Joe w. Rozzelle. attorney for plaint-
iif; II. n. Clark, j. G. McMurray and
Logan & Miller, attorney for defend
ant
2177-George ID. Mckay VS.. John
Moore ct al. McMullin & Sternberg,
attorneys for plaintiff; Wheeler &
Weiser, attorneys for defendants.
2l95-Charles Meircort VS.. Charles
Whitford. ] Grafton O'Bryan. attor-
ney for plaintiff; Wheeler & Weiser,
attorney for defendant
2213-The Mines Timber Supply
company VS.. Conrad Hanson, Henry
r. Rhone, attorney for plaintiff; Ed
mund ]. Churchill, attorney for de-
fendant
221S-Charles Linn VS.. Addison F.
Brown. A. II. Davis, Frank A. Dut-
ton and Fry & Welsh attorneys for
plaintiff. and Griffith & Watson at
torneys for defendant
2221-Benton Canon, conservator.
VS.. the Bonita Valley Land company.
Fry & Welsh. attorneys for plaintiff,
and Logan & Miller. and Wheeler &
Weiser. attorneys for defendant
2225, 222G, -2227-Benton Canon,
conservator, VS.. Horace r. De Long.
Fry & Welsh, attorneys for plaintiff;
Logan e. Miller and Wheeler &
Weiser, attorneys for defendant.
Maurice j. Haggerty VS..
Morris Haggerty ct al. Bucklin e.
Upper, attorneys for plaintiff
Wheeler & Weiser, attorneys for de-
fendant.
2245-The Barrows Investment
company VS.. the Mesa County Ma
tional bank. Burgess & kinard. at
torneys for plaintiff; McMullin &
Sternberg, attorneys for defendant.
2225-Thomas Dwyer ct al. VS..
John B. Harris. J. f. Halderman and
McMullin g. Sternberg. attorneys for
plaintiff; Wheeler & Weiser, attor-
neys for defendant.
2269-Elizabeth Mullen Reid VS..
Mary E. Roth. McMullin e. Stern
berg and Elmer l.. Brock, attorneys
for plaintiff, and Wheeler G. Weiser,
attorneys for defendant.
2275-Utah Nursery company VS..
Sophia Moore. McMullin & Stern
berg, attorneys for plaintiff; Wheel
er & Weiscr, attorneys for defend
ant.
2277-Louis Harms VS.. the Bank
ers' Finance & Securities company.
Griffith & Watson, attorneys for
plaintiff.
22S9-James C. Garman vs. Ed
ward G. Doss. Frank A. Dutton.
Lorin A. Staley. Fry & Welsh, attor-
neys for plaintiff; Nourse & Halder-
man. attorneys for defendant
2293-Leonidas p. Thompson ct al.
VS.. Abraham N. Probasco ct al. Nc
Mullin & Sternberg, attorneys for
plaintiff.
2296-Mary Frances Currie VS.. A.
p Werden ct al. Frank England and
Charles F. Morris, attorneys for
plaintiff, and j. G. Schweigert. attor-
ney for defendants.
2297-Mary Frances Currie VS.. S.
F. Hickman ct al. Frank Langland
and Charles r. Morris, attorneys for
plaintiff, and Griffith & Watson, at
torney for defendants.
2299-John Peterson VS.. the Uin-
tah Railway company. Loren l.. Nor