The Mankato free press. [volume] (Mankato, Blue Earth County, Minn.) 1879-1924, 1913-06-06
Larceny Is Charged
Entered Guilty Plea
l.ag fsN.i Is 1 60 gfsl

las sss,f Is [ s.sgtss 4
Herbert IS. ING pewell, who was lar
rested about d week ago for steais1
ing a bicycle belonging to Casper
Hinzeman, after having been bound
over to await the action of the dis.
trict court made application to plead
guilty this morning, and after a short
examination. entered a. plea OF guilty
to- the enarge of larceny"fanA the
second degree He was sbound'toyeri
to i'the custody of the sheriff. TO
await his sentence f. -
Mcdowell was released from the
state prison at Bismark, N. ID. on
the first of May this year, after
having served three s'years,Mon a
charge of arson and burglary He
was pardoned seni account Of i'll
health de went to Rochester. so he
says, where heISwas examined for
cancer, 1T was determined that he
did mot have this disease, land then
he came to Mankato, &and had been
doing some work for aCaptain F. p.
Buyer Of 1.-THE Salvation array He
says sthat he was stoid at the hospi.
tai at Rochester that he WAS a yic4
tim of Head poisoning He was help
ing to unload loadief hay ON the
day the wheel. was stolen, and after
finishing his work, camel out hof' the
barn with the wheel He seld 1T for
IS, and spent part of the money In
saloons. He says that he had been
drinking before he went to help UNI
load theshay His fathersis dead, and
his mother lives in State Center, Ia.
He has a sister, Mrs. Bessie, Smith.
who he says lives in Minneapolis,
but comes to sMankato occasionally
Mrs. Smith was arrested and heavily
fined here, this winter for drunkenness
and disorderly conduct.
District Court Session.
District court convened at ten
o'clock this morning, and prelimin-
airy call of the calendar was given by
Judge "A. sR. tPfau, Sr. There are
forty jury cases and thirty court
cases for trial at this term of court:
The jury cases are the following !:
State Farmers Mutual Hail insurance
company of Waseca VS.. d. l.. will
liams; Farmer and Works Land com:
pany VS.. Joseph Schooner; Julius
.Lachett VS. The Town of Mcpherson
and Grams; A. j.. Rush VS.. f. w.
Schultz; John s. Bradstreet com.
pany VS.. -Four traction Auto com
,oa,, Xy;ator -Tanpayf VS., cErpoctin
Barth'; Michel Keiser VS.. r. e.
Stanke; Town of Rapidan VS.. c. s.
Erickson, ct al; Boswell and Son VS.
John -Rinehart; j. b. and d. Rich
ards vs.. F. c. Davis; j. B. and ID
Richards vs. F. C. Davis; .Zuel-Wood'
Golf company VS.. F. M Long and
John O'Toole; Ella Bruiske VS.. Otto
Weeks; George Lang VS.. Grover
Weir; Louis j. Compton vs. Asborne
T.. rEnglerth; Hubbard Milling com
pany s.nE ]. Grover and Atwood
Stone; Frederick Kuester vs. Clara
Fellows; First National Bank Di
Mankato VS.. A. p: johnson; ri. f.
Osgood. and the National Fence and
Supply company; III. Glen Allyn Geo
w. allyn VS.. j. M. Byron and h. II
Dieudonni; First National Bank o.
Mankato VS.. III. e. Stark; Ida nj
stark and fE. Barnes; Title FHover
son VS.. Fred .Hydorn; Ella fTew VS.
Fred Hydorn; s.. B. Wilson VS.. j
R. Lloyd; Ftp. Fairehild vs.. O.. E
Flemming; Consumers Power com
pany VS.. &C. A. Bishman; First Ma
tional Bank of M4nkato VS.. e. F
Griffith; j. F. 0sgood and the Ma
.tional Fence and Supply company
Botsford Lumber company VS.. c. S
Erickson and the Massachusetts
Bonding and Insurance company; N
l.. Erickson VS.. John O'Brien; Eyal
Olson VS. Anton Exner; First Nation
al Bank of Mankato VS.. y. II. Lon
and W. G. Hoerr; Herman Haacl
as administrator of the estate Q
Hubert Hack vs. Charles F.'-Pollei
TN. Coughlan and HENRY .Fricke
Otto Lamm and John HI. -Hohman
VS.. c." j. Macbeth and George Il
Lang; Johnson and Southwiek VS..
R. Hammer: Otto Neitge VS.. f. /
,Emmler: George Nv. Aeker an
Frank x. Acker VS.. Ira j. Pierre
and Eva Olson; Ellen Horan vs. Ne
Riehiand Telephone company; lri
A. Noble VS. j. B. Nelson Censtru'
tion company; Peter Brahs }ys. Fran
H. Snyder; Roderick Mckenzie VI
Simon McKenzie; a case in Oh
matter of the estate of Carl Pfei
deceased and Anton Bierl US. Chici
go ST. Paul, Minneapolis and Oman
railway company
The Court Cases.
The court cases for trial are
Charlotte Aubrey VS.. William Fit
loft; Charlotte Aubrey VS.. Willial
Freitag and Laura Mahoney; ]. I
Jones VS.. Priscilla jones' Wells
Cornish VS.. Ernestine F. and E.
Hamil; Olga burns VS.. Burt Durns
J.W. Sprague VS.. Eugene Hadle!
Soren Nelson vs.. George tEberhar
GIN. Henderson VS.! Helen A. Hende
son; Minnie Reimann Tvs. F. A. Re
mann; Mary E. Soule VS.. MINI
Van sBlarcum West; Mertie fR.
,Perske VS.. Louie E. Perske; Schwe
der Brothers vs.. j. G. Frederick
sR. N Gordon, "A G. Hopkins al
Ella Hopkins VS.. Fidelity and q
-