The daily sentinel., 1913-02-20

are listed for trial at this time Ii
is very likely that an adjourned ses-
= sion of the court will be necessary to
close UP the docket The docket is
as follows:
1293-In the matter of the assign
ment of the Colorado State Bank of
Grand Junction, Colo. James w.
Bucklin, attorney.
171I-B. r. Lapree. VS.. ]. w.
Shepheard. Ben Griffith, attorney
for plaintiff. James C. Gentry, at
torney for defendant
lSl3-Petition of the town of
Palisade to change point of diversion.
Ed r. Brown and Logan & Miller.
attorneys.
1S15-Petition of i. b. C. Kirken-
dali to modify, in the matter of the
application of William Cox ct al. for
an adjudication of water rights in
water district No. ~. Henry r.
Rhone, attorney.
1SI7-The Grand Junction Water
company VS.. J. Marshall Miller. Grif-
fifth & Watson, attorneys for defend
ant
1S35-Petition of James A. Now
TO modify in the matter of the appli-
cation of William Cox ct al. for an
adjudication of water rights in water
district No. AZ. Straud NJ. Logan.
attorney.
1S36-Petition of j. S. Griffiths to
modify in the matter of the applica-
ton of william Cox ct al. for an ad-
Indication of water rights in water
district No. AZ. Straud NJ. Logan, at
torney.
1S6l-E W. Jordan VS.. F. NJ.
Burger. Griffith & Watson, attor-
neys for plaintiff, and Wheeler AZ
Weiser. attorneys for defendant.
1s67-The people of the state of
Colorado. ex rel. James W. Bucklin
VS.. Henry Il. Grubbs ct al. James w.
Bucklin. attorney for plaintiff, and
Fry & Welsh. attorneys for defend
ant.
1S79-Frank e. Gowen VS.. Chas.
W. Patterick. Henry r. Rhone, at
torney for plaintiff; Wheeler &
Weiser, attorneys for defendant.
1906-Francis Gilpin ct al. VS..
William s. Wallace ct al Straud M.
Q.ogan. attorney for plaintiff; Wheel
tr. & Weiser, attorneys for defendant.
S967-Adam N Schuster VS.. Alfred
II. Davis. McMullin & Sternberg. at
torneys for PLAINTIFF, and A. II. Davis,
attorney for defendant
1870 f. Magenheimer VS.. e. f.
Gardner Logan & Miller, attor-
neys for plalntiff.
1975-Frank S. Carman ct al VS..
Olive r. Mead. Griffith & Watson,
attorney for plaintiff, and Sam b.
Berry, attorneys for defendant.
199S-In the matter of the assign
ment of the j. A. McCulloch Feed &
Implement company. &C. b. Hill,
assignee. Joe w. Rozzelle. attorney.
2026-Mary e. Cunningham VS..
the Union Trust & Banking company
ct al Henry r. Rhone, attorney for
plaintiff McMullin & Sternberg,
Griffith & Watson and Joe w. Roz-
2elle. attorneys for defendant.
203S-Mary S. Rhinehart ct al. VS..
the Denver & Rio Grande R. r. com
pany. McMullin & Sternberg. attor-
neys for plaintiffs. and f. N. Clark,
Richard Peete and Sylvester G. Will
iams, attorneys for defendant.
2044-The Grand Junction Feed &
Implement company VS.. the Denver
& Rio Grande r. R. company. Nc
Mullin & Sternberg, attorneys for
Plaintiff, and E. N. Clark. Richard
Peete and Sylvester G. Williams, at
torneys for defendant,
21l0-James NJ. Peery VS.. the
city of Grand Junction. Colo Wheel
er & Weiser, attorneys for plaintiff,
and Bucklin G. Tupper attorneys for
defendant
4-Benjamin A. Smith VS..
Wade Hampton. Logan & Milelr, at
torneys for plaintiff, and Joe w.
Rozzelle, attorney for defendant.
2119-David S. Van Cleve VS..
Emily Canaan. Griffith & Watson
attorneys for plaintiff; McMullin &
Sternberg, attorneys for defendant.
2120-Jesse Howard Dodson VS..
the Redlands Irrigation Power com
pany. Wheeler & Weiser, attorneys
for plaintiff: Griffith & Watson, at
torneys for defendant
2123-The people of the state OF
Colorado. ex rel r. B. Currie VS.
John II. Dunston, Sam B. Berry, at