The Grangeville globe. [volume] (Grangeville, Idaho) 1907-1922, 1913-02-13


call a reconsideration
The consideration of the bill was
the last piece of work done by the
house Saturday and when it was
reached only AZ members were
present and voting. No word for
or against the bill was said in de-
bate. The vote on the bill was 35
to 3 in favor of its passage.
Five news bills were filed for
introduction in the senate.
No. SO by Goodnight, prohibits
minors from frequenting pool
halls when less than 1S years of
age. The bill makes the minor
and the pool hall proprietor eq-
ually responsible under the law.
No. 100 by Sweet, provides that
educational funds may be invested
IN highway district bonds.
No. 101 by Tggington, provides
witnesses called for the state in
rebuttal need not be indorsed on
the information.
No. lO1 by Edgington, amends
section 1887 and provides that any
real or personal property belong
ing to an irrigation district, which
is not needed by the district, may
be sold.
No. 103 by Shepherd, au' horizes
appointment of an office deputy
at salary of 81 800 per year and
expenses, but gives to the food
| inspector and his deputies extra
ordinary police powers.
Under its provisions the pure
food and sanitary inspectors may
arrest any person upon whom they
may have a suspicion of violation
of the sanitary food laws. A war
rant is not required.
, Statewide Makes Appearance.
Statewide prohibition made its
; debut in the legislature today, en-
tering in the form of a bill by
: Bradley of Canyon and Mason of
/ Latah, introduced in the lower
! house. The bill is a drastic one
: prohibiting the manufacturing, sell.
: ing, giving away, or otherwise dis
7 posing of intoxicating liquors. Il
even prohibits the circulation OF
r advertisements by outside liquor
houses and breweries. The au
{ thors claim, however, that it doe!
not prevent the individual con
t sumption of liquor.
: Bradley made brief speech OF
d the introduction of the bill, ex
e planning his position. He referre'
q to rumors that have circulated o
r combinations for or against state
+ wide prohibition, and declared tina
this bill is not the result of an,
J. such combinations.
It Regarding the republican plat
n form pledges, he said he ha'
e pledged himself to his constituen
S to stand for statewide prohibitio
and that they knew he stood tina
d way ever since he had been /
d politics. He said he could see III
n tie in store for the republ'ca
Is party unless it passed such legs
Ie lation.
II Finke of Nez Perce answere
e. Bradley by declaring that thel
h was little in store for the part
!. unless it let the liquor questlo
Ie alone at this time and expresse
d the hope that the members woul
If stand by their pledges and Kill u
b. bill in committee.
Mason made an effort to rea
Is the plank in the platform refe
r. ring to the liquor question, bl
Of was held out of order by tt
m speaker. The bill Will go 10 u
e, committee on privileges and ele
,e tions and it is generally concedf
r. that it will come back to the hou
with a favorable report.
10 Supreme Court Intact.
a. BY a vote of II to IL the Sc
IS ate today refused to humillate Il
a supreme court of the state becau
re of some of its recent decisio1
e. The action was taken in eonsidf
v. alton of Senator Dunning's res
he luton providing for a conStlt
~ tional amendment to place the
III nreme court ON the same level
is all other state courts, subject
re the will of the legislature, Ser