Newark evening star and Newark advertiser. [volume] (Newark, N.J.) 1909-1916, 1913-11-15
BLUM WILL OPEN
WITH T|ELSCH TEAM
Essex County Alley-0wners'
League TO Get Under Way
Monday.
SCHWARTZ vs.. KRAEMER

The complete schedule Of the Es-
sex County Alley Owners Bowling
League, which gets under way Mon
day night. is out. The schedule Is a
big one, the final match being rolled
on Monday night. March 9. Blum
will roll Tielsch, at Blum. while
Schw,,. Il will face Kraemer. at
Schwartz, in the opening matches
Monday night. The complete sched-
ule follows:
November II, Blum VS.. Tielsch, at
Blum, Schwartz vs.. Kraemer, at
Schwartz: Is, Weber VS. Nate, at
Weber 1ielsch VS.. Blum at Tielsch;
10, White Palace VS.. lie elise, at
White Palace: q. East End VS..
Scrwartz, at East End; "a. Blum vs..
East End, at Blum. Tielsch vs..
Kraemer, at Tielsch: %, Nate vs..
w. & w, at Nate; rs. lie elise VS..
Weber, at LIE elise, East End VS..
Tielsch, at East End.
December l, Blum VS.. White Pal
ace, at Blum; Schwartz VS.. lie elise,
at Schwartz. Tielsch VS. Weber, at
Tielsch; 2, Weber VS.. Kraemer, at
Weber, Nate VS. Schwartz, at Nate;
3, White Palace vs. East End, at
White Palace, LIE elise VS.. schwartz,
at lie elise; 5, East End W.. Nate, at
East End. Schwartz vs.. Rlum, at
Schwartz; 5, Blum VS.. Nate, at
Blum, Schwartz VS.. Weber, at
Schwartz; 9, Weber VS.. Schwartz,
at Webber, Nate VS.. LIE elise. at
Nate, Tielsch vs.. w. & w. at Tlelsch.
TO- White Palace VS.. Schwartz, at
White Palace: u. LIE elise VS..
Kraemers. at Lee Gl sc, East End vs
White Palace, at East End. Tlelsch
VS. Nate, at Tielsch; 10, Blum VS.
Kra erer, at Blum. Schwartz VS..
T'elsch. at Schwartz: 16 webher VS..
w & w, at Webber, Nate VIZ Tielsch
ut Nate. Kramer VS. East End al
Kraemer: II, White Palace VS. Web
Ter at White Palace: 10, SchwaI IL
vs Nate. at Schwartz. Tielsch VS.
White Palace. at Tielsch: %. Blum
Va Schwartz. at Bum w & w
vs Tielsch at w a w: %. Nate VS.
R'rm. at Nate Rraemer VS.. White
Palace. at Kraemer: 30 w. e. W
Va Bum. at w & w, T'elsch VS.
East End. ut Tielsch. 20 wehhel
vs.. White Palace. Mt WeSher. Nate
va Eat End at Nate. Kraemer vs.
w e. w M Kraemer
January fo1d--h blum vs lie C'isa
ut Plum w q w vs Wh'ta palace
~ w. b w: 8 webber VS. Tre'sch. q
Weber Nate VS.. Frn emer. ~ Nate I
White Palace VS.. Npta. ri white pal-
are: q. lie elise vs plum, at LIE elise
Schwartz VS. White Palace nj
Schwartz: - w & w. We. Nate, a.
w. e. w T'elsch VS.. Schwnrtz a.
Tie'sch. 10 Wabber We East End a.
at Webber Nate va White Palace, a.
Nate rramer VS.. Tielseh ut Kramer
IA White Palace VS. Rraemer, a.
White Palace: IS lie elise VS. Nate
at LeG'ise. East End VS. Blrm ri
Fact End 10 w. & w VS. lie elise
Plum; 20. Weber VS.. lie elise. a.
Webber. Kraemer vs Nate. ut Krae.
mer: u White Palace VS. w & w.
at White Palace; %. East End VS.
Rraemer. at East End; '6. w. NV
VS.. Schwartz. at w & w; 81. Krae
mer VS.. Blum. at Kraemer: os VIII
Palace VS.. Tie'sch. at White Palace
30. lie elise vs.. White Palace, a
lie G Use. East End VS.. Weber. a
East End.
February-2, w & w. We Kraemer
at w & w, Schwartz VS. East Erd
at Schwartz: 3. Weber vs. Blum, a
Weber. Kraemer VS.. Schwartz. q
Rraemer. Tielsch vs. lie elise, a
Tielsch; 4, White Palace VS.. Blum. a
White Palace; 6. lie G'ise VS. Eas
End, at lie elise; 3. w. & w. VS.. Web
Der, at w. & w; 10. Nate vs Web
Der. at Nate, Kraemer VS.. lie elise, a
Kraemer; 13, East End VS.. LIE elise
at East End; 16. Blum VS., w. & w.
ut Blum; 90 lie elise VS.. w. & W, a
LIE elise; 20, w. * w. VS.. East End
at w. & W; "a. Kraemer VS.. Weber
at Kramer; 81. East End VS.. w. & w.
at East End. lie elise VS.. Tielsch, a
lie elise.
March,, Schwartz VS.. w. & w.
at Schwartz.