davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31
Thirst published in The Topeka State
Journal July 3, 1881
NOTICE FOR BIDS.


NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, That
sealed proposals will be received by the
State Board of Irrigation at Scott City,
Kansas for 80 days, for the putting down
of wells, construction of reservoirs, fur
nishing and installing of wind-mills. en-
gines pumps and for such other neces-
sary equipment and machinery as may be
called for in the plans and specifications
on file at the office of the State Board
of Irrigation at Scott City, Kansas, loca-
ton of said plants to be in Wichita, Lane
and Wallace Counties.
plans and specifications will be furnish
ed or receipt of certified check for Ten
$4,000 Dollars, which check will be re-
turned when the plans and specifications
are returned to the Board in good order
The Board reserves the right to reject
any and all bids. Successful bidder to
give bond to be approved by the Board.
sccording to the provisions of Chapter IA
of the Session Laws of 1913. 80
bids will be opened on August 4, 1913,
at the office of the State Board of Irri-
cation at Scott City. Kansas.
B. p. WALKER, Secretary.
r A HINES Chairman.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31
First published in The Topeka State |
Journal June q. 1871
DAY NOTICES OF APPLICA-
TON OF BUSINESS COLLEGES
FOR A PERMIT TO CANVASS
IN THE STATE OF KANSAS
Topeka, Kansas, June "a,

Topeka, Kansas, June "a 1913
Notice is hereby given that the following
business colleges Cor commercial depart
ments of other schools) have made appIi-
cation to me for a permit to canvass in
the State of Kansas for the purpose OF
ceiling tuition in advance and contracting
M. securing notes for tuition from students
before their registration at the business
colleges Cor commercial Departmental
herein named
Pittsburg Business College. Pittsburg,
Kansas.
Ransomerian Business School, Kansas
City, Mo.
If satisfactory proof is furnished that
any of the above named colleges or com
mercial departments are incompetent to
furnish such a course of instruction as
they advertise or that the moral sur
roundings of the institution are NOT good
or that the premises are kept in an un-
healthy condition, or that the agents of
said institutions use Misrepresentation or
fraudulent method in securing Contracts
notes, or cash from prospective students
in such case a permit will not be granted
to such business college Cor commercial
Departmental
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31

First published in The Topeka State
Journal Thursday, July II, 1881
In the Probate Court of Shawnee County,
Kansas.
nj the Matter of the Estate of Weaver
D. Witwer, Deceased.
NOTICE OF FINAL SETTLEMENT.
Creditors and all other persons interest
ed in the aforesaid estate, are hereby
notified that on the 18th day of August,
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31
W. D. ROSS.
First published in The Topeka State
Journal Thursday, July II. 1881

In the Probate Court Of Shawnee County,
Kansas
In the Matter of the Estate of Ellen c.
Witwer, Deceased.
NOTICE OF FINAL SETTLEMENT
Creditors and all other persons in the
aforesaid estate, are hereby notified that
on the 25th day of August, 1918, I shall
apply to the Probate Court sitting at the
Court House in the City of Topeka, Shaw
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31
First published in The Topeka State
Journal Thursday. July 81 1871
In the Probate Court of Shawne Cour


In the Probate Court of Shawne County.
Kansas.
In the Matter of the Estate of G. NJ.
Blair, Deceased.
NOTICE OF FINAL SETTLEMENT
Creditors and all other persons interest
ed in the aforesaid estate, are hereby
notified that on the 1st day of September
1918. said day being the first Monday of
said month and the first day of the Sep
TENDER, 1913 term. 1 shall apply to the
Probate Court sitting at the Court House
in the City of Topeka, Shawnee County
ansas. for full and final settlement of
said estate and for an order OF the Court
finding and adjudging who are the heirs
of G. NJ. Blair, deceased.
JAMES w. BLAIR,
GILBERT B. BLAIR,
Executors.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31

nee County, Kansas. for full and final
settlement of said estate and for an order
of the Court finding and adjudging who
are the heirs of Ellen c. Whitwer. de-
ceased. WEAVER D. WITWER.
Executor.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31
First published in The Topeka State
Journal Thursday, July II, 1871

State of Kansas Shawnee County, SIS.
In the Matter of the Estate of Paul
Mulyane late of Shawnee County, Kan
NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT.
Notice is hereby given that on the 11th
dav of July, A. D. 1913, the undersigned
was, by the Probate Court OF shawnee
traitor of the partnership estate of PAU
Mulvane Gn the firm of Elliott & Null
Al nsrties interested in said estate will
take notice and govern themselves accord
ineri1, J. c. ELLIOTT,
iii7-' Administrator.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31

GOOD 6 room house and 2 lots in North
Topeka to trade for small tract of land
north of town. Phone 3407
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31

1913, 1 shall apply to the Probate Court
sitting at the Court house in the CITY of
Topeka, Shawnee County, Kansas, for a
full and final settlement of said estate
and for an order of the Court finding and
adjudging who are the heirs of Weaver d
Witwer. deceased.
WEAVER d. WITWER.
Executor of Estate of Ellen c. Wftyver
Deceased Executor.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31

FORT WORTH, TEX. city property for
Toneka city property or nearby farm
land. Address c. A Sloan, s24 Lincoln.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31
FOR EXCHANGE.

WANT CLEAR RENTAL.
East or West side. worth 81 600 to 2 200.
Have dandy, fully equipped 40 horse fore
door overland or West side lots. Here is
your chance for something good. Owner,
1890 Red.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31

First published in The Topeka State
journal Thursday, July 81, 1871
state of Kansas, Shawnee County, IS.
In the Matter of the Estate of Louis
OIney, lat of Shawnee County, Kansas.
NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT.
Notice is hereby given that on the Goth
day of July. A. D. 1873 the undersigned
was, by the Probate Court of Shawnee
County, Kansas, duly appointed Executor
of the estate of Louis Olney, late of Shaw
nee County. deceased. All parties in
terested in said estate will take notice
and govern themselves accordingly
l.. r. MANLEY, Executor.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31
LEGAL.
EGAL. .
EGAI
State Journal July 81, 1881



Q
N Statement dn Treas Ls ptrR sen
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31
FOR NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS.

FOR RENT-2.O00 acres improved ranch, in
tracts to suit purchaser, from $1,000 to
$500 per acre, easy terms. Located in
south part of Osborne Co. Fenced and 200
acres in cultivation. Call write r. T
Fowler. Lucas, Kan
FOR RENT-Store room, 404 East 4th
suitable for living in rear half. Call
COL East 4th st.
FOR RENT-Store room and basement
929 Kansas ave. S299 Blue.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31

2 HORSES, perfectly sound, weight 1,15O
each, price reasonable, must sell. Phone
IT'S K s.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31
FOR SALE-HORSES, COWS,

FOR SALE-s6 head of Jersey and Gurer-
sey cows. 2 to years old. fresh and
coming fresh; all tested cows. A special
price on bunch o. n. Hamburger 415
Fillmore st
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31
UNDERTAKING.
TYPEWRITERS.

We have all makes typewriters for sale
or rent. cash or payments. TOPEKA
TYPEWRITER Ex..T 4z9 Kansas ave.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31
FOR RENT-FLATS.

MODERN furnished light housekeeping
-apartmenIs and rooms. go Quincy st,
FOR RENT-Two modern flats One with
sleeping porch and garage. Better
Realty & Loan Co, New England Bldg
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31
BILLIARD and POCKET TABLES

FOR SALE-New and secondhand carurn
and pocket billiard tables and bowling
alleys. We lead the world in cheap fig.
lures; easy payments. Send for catalogue
Brunswtck-Balke -CollendeT Co, 1z2o-u
Main street Kansas City, No.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31

AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FUND
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31
AUTOMOBILES.

HI UIFIUuILLOI
. YOUR cylinder, three passenger Buick
y automobile, good condition, quick sale
S225.Oo. 2766 Red. 1012 Polk.
FOR SALE-Cheap, 45 h. p. car in fine
condition. Cole Motor Co. 527 Jackson
st.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31

WILL SELL at once our horses, wagons
and harness using auto de-
LIVERY. Topeka Laundry Co.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31
FLORISTS.
TRANSFER AND STORAGE,

MERCHANTS Transfer and Storage Ca.
furnish expert packers: also look after
freight Phones 41S6. Skinner & Gayharf
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31
FOR RENT-HOUSES.

FOR Rents room house, newly papered
and painted, close uptown, at very low
rent, in rear of store, I'LL Kansas ave.
Ask at the store. Also 3 nice light rooms
for rent over store in North Topeka.
Very reasonable. Ask at store 1904 N
Kansas ave
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1913-07-31
INVEST MENTS.

claws 19O5. chapter 472. section ~
The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1913-06-10
ITS PROGRESS, SAYS EBERHARr
J. J. nm IL Plainly Asitat~d by the
Rate DecisiOn.

ST. PAUL. Mimi. June Gov. Eber.
hart sees in the Minnesota rate decision
q victory for state control Of all public
utilities. He said:
The victory of the state in the rate
case is most gratifying. II indicates
that the Supreme Court believes in
stat. control as eXemplified by the rail
road commission. whose findings Il ur.-
holds. and in every way is a progress,
Interpretation of the progressive Split
of the Constitution"
The fact that the court held in HI
Minnesota case the opinion that the two
cent rate was reasonable for the North
"rn Pacific and the Great Northern sys-
tens. but contiscatory TO the Minneap.
the dlSmay of Great Northern and
Northern Pacific representatives.
That James i Hin was deeply affected
by the decision was ma infested in his
replies made to the reporter who asked
for statement relative to the matter
ilil emerged from his offic. and said
that ne had nothing To say.
II did not read the news. and further
more have not anything To say about
anything" he declared
According to officials who are closely
acquainted with Mr.. Hill he was n
tcnSely wrought uu over the "hioN"
aimed principally al his roads. Several
officials said thtS seldom had seen him
50 aeitatcd about any weichty matter.
The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1913-06-10
DELANO IS DISAPPOINTED.
~. 4. Nudge ALSO HAD Hoped for
Better ResuIu

CHIr,Go. June ? - Railroad officials in
Chicago commented as follows on tn.
Minnesota rate decision:
The decision s. "A disappointment 70
me, said President Dclano of the Wa
bash. We had hoped FOR different
result. But ! would not care to eN-
press myself more than 10 saw That IL
is a disappointment, in a general way.
until have studied the decision care
fully"
The decision as | get II frNm our
general counsel II involved and uutil |
can get the fun text and make a study
OF II. ] would not care 10 express an
opinion on H." said II l. Nudge, presi-
dent OF the Chicago Rock Island and
Pacific I'm a general way the decision
is disappointing. We had hoped fo, "A
more favorable result"
Il have not read IN. decision and onl>
know about ii III a general way. |
would not care to discuss 1t until have
studied IL carefully" said Samuel NJ
FELTON,. president of the Great Western
The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1913-06-10
CASE PUZZLES WALL STREET.
Brokers ImrertR,W Nrgnrdi"n VIM
uesOta NHtr DeristOu.

60.
N'''r "''''"N at" "a' ,,1,,
ne "eV'N''' "a NV $685., ,,s.I, a,
'.e IMAM IT" ',.',,, .,u-
h'eh''"h sun u'''''N ,,,.,,. ,,..r,,
''""s w ''',- .,,,. .,,,,,,,,o,
''..orS II" .,a, n,.,,., vv,,,
N'"7 w ~ -. l.. %
stree "h'' II" ,".' ,,a.,
'ie '"'' Nt' '"' io"'u ,,, ,,,,.,..
u""'s' SloVN "'Nr' - ,.,.,.' ,,',i,. a,saa.
vi '"' po' '''''0 tn.
e''e' '"' "'''"' ,,,,,1,
an" "'p'"N ,,,,-
'"Nor ''e '".' '""'
''oH' ,,t
'"e "'"S .,,,.,to 40
I""Ne'S an" ""' NV. - 49, .',,,,..
I" Jus, "''. III" -,
M"~' f.'e'
A"pp"' "''.,"' ,""' Wv i.
W. '"e "eV's'o" VIZ "o - :,
"' N'''''"' w.
'@''" ia" ~ T.,h
The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1913-06-10
VuIr Ancctt0x niunttOn.

The court laid down the rule that
the railroad company W, not entitled
To receive more in valuation for its
right of way than 'te fair average
market Naiue Of similar land in the
vicinity. without additions by the use
Of multiplc,s or otherwise to cover
hypothetical uutlaNs. Al the same
iin,o the court rejects the rule applied
bv the special master ia ascertaining
the cost of construction. including road
bed. bridges. tunnels. &c. In hAins
this valuation the master asCertained
the cost Of reproduction anew. without
any deduction for depreciation. After
pu.uting out that the evidence showed
that there was actual depreciation.
Justice Hughes declares that the courts
cannot approve the method 10y which
the special master arrived ~ the valu
alton of the rolling stock and other
construction work.
The court also challenges the plan of
apport ioning the value of the prop
erty as found between the interstate
and the inlrastate business upon the
basis ~ the gross revenue from each.
This * u simple method said Jus
tice Hughes easily applied and for
tha, reason has been repeatedly used
II has not. however been approved by
this court and its correctness il now
challenged The gross earnings may be
consumed 10y expenses. leaving little 81
10 profit "
The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1913-06-10

In ;1' third plIrp TIE roGrt acid that.
u en W'tNnVt ec',I los CpaslrS.. the
'untmcr"e clause u' ti.; rors'ituttuu u-t-.
'ar'i' lud"" ~" states from direct con-
70. "' Sun1ec'S -nibra' "d WITHIN the olause
vac n a." Of slrrn natuI. tndt II t.uulst-d
AZ tH. their regulation should u, pl..
Scrlb"d hN "A ~lugl" authority Then. D.
tnus s'rl'"d lh" "s-'.iltlal Immunity Of
inierStat" ir'"rc"uIs. from IN. imposition
~ th' stats 80 di'rc' burdens ana r--
strautS.
II hs.~ "eco aImltjrdl, ,iccl,r,d ., thi.
court 'hHt |S - tuus" subjects wh.,n re-
Iuire Ce-eral sysi,m On uniformity of
ioSuIhcon the power ~ Congress = "N-
'lds'N' IN oih"r matters admittirg uf
'lN"r'itN Of treatment according 20 IN.
Npec.hi 'oqI'!"r'erts Of local conditions
'h" Hta'Ns may fci v'th'n their resp-cti,.
jurisdiction unr. Congress rees 81 10 act
ana NA"n congress does sCt. the sA-Icisc
az lts authority override au contiictine
state legislation"
IN" prrLipl" which determines mi.
classification urderlies the 6nctrin. that
the states cannot under any gulse i'm
pose burdens an intcrstat. commerce.
Extent "f states Righ,s.
Rut the court holdS. az It's fourth
roint that there remains 20 tn. States
ne exercise OF the power appropriate
Z" their territorial jurisdiction in MAX
nr suitable provisions for local needs
Justice Hughes in his opinion said:
u extends 20 thOs" matters OF n Ioral
na'hr" ns 10 which u IS impossible to de.
nv" from the consti7ut lonal grant an in
i"ntion that they should go Uncontrolled
pending Fsderal intervention. Thus there
are certain subjects having the most OH
Nlous ana direct relation to Interstate
commerce which. nevertheless with tn.
1cpul"SC"nco of Congress. have been con
'toll"d by state legislation from th..
foundation Of the Government because or
N" necessity thar they should not remain
unreg'lat"d and that ;heir equation
mould he adapted 10 varying local exi
@"n'l"s' n"n"" the a absencr ~ rcgulation
Nv congress- IN such matters has not Inn
ported that there should b. no restriction.
bat ra'hcr mat the States should con
'inu" I" supr'y the needed rules until con.
a'e.s should decide to supersede them
Fur'h"l Il is competent for Si.t.
I" govern rs Internal commerce. 10 pro-
'0' Local improvements to create and
''eHIal' local facilities, to adop, protec.
llN' measures Of reasonable charac,c,
m m" interest, health, safety. morals and
"'ittr ~ us people, although ntersta,,
'"m'n"''" may Incidentally ar Indirectly
he luvolvcd.
'bur system "C government is a pta,,L
Al adjustment ht whirn tn. natr,nal am
innrlty, ~ conferred uN the Constitution
~ malhtd'h'd "a ~ fun scope withou
unnec"sshrN Ip's of local efficiency Who,
mo suNl"'i - peculiarly one of local con
'Nth ana ''"lu itS nature belongs to tn.
class "l''l "h''h the STATE appropri,,el
deals IN mdklng r"asonablc prnyision IN
local needs 1t canno, be REGARDED as lef
The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1913-06-10

George MacIn'yre. clerk in the oN''s
OF the assistant postmaster Of New Norl,
got "A divorce in an hour in Newark ve-ier-
day. The court stopped the hearing after
two witnesses from Plalnfeld had old
stories about Mrs Maclntyrc
The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1913-06-10
SENATOR NELSON PLEASED.
Decision 10 Great victory for state
Rights, Tie Says.

WASHINGTON, June a,-Senator Nelson
Of Minnesota. who is regarded AZ one
Of the most competent lawyers in the
Senate. had this tn say tonight in
regard To the supreme Courts de-
cision
1T IL great victory for the State
and for state rights in rate making
have not had chance to read the
opinion in full so cannot speak more
In dstAN ct this tina
The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1913-06-10

Commissioner Lederle received formal
application from the friedman Institute
Yesterday requesting permission to ad-
minister the Friedman serum.
The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1913-06-10

to the unrestrain"d vii, of individuals be-
cause Congress has not acted. although IL
may have such - relation to inter Statr
commerce as to hc Within IA" '"drh or
he Federal power
The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1913-06-10

Their main contention however. was
that tho attempt Of the state to hN
a rate over an Interstate road, even be-
tween Two points within the state
whore the rate fell below the interstate
rate approved by the Interstate Com
mcrr" Commission covering practically
the same haul. was a burden upon in
torslate commerce. This contention tho
Suprcmc Court to-day disposed Of when
Il held that In the absence Of any 10.
tiun Nv congress regulating such mat
tsIs the state has full authority 10
p-csCrIb" the rate between points within
.,o state. regardless of whether or not
it ~ uniform with the interstate rate
within the same tarf zone.
The Interstate railroads also based
their attack on the ground that they
could not observe the states order and
apply the lower rate without laying
themselves liable to he hailed before the
Interstate Commerce Commission on a
complaint of practising discrimination
against shippers who were charged the
higher rate for the same haul in inter-
stat" commerce.
Esprrts Valuations I phrid.
Whcn confronted with SUGGESTION
,ha,t thcv .,uuId rcduc. ,hc ir,,rs,,,.
PATIO tu . Icvcl vi,h tbs ra,.s nr,scrihcd
hv tho Nnncso,,, commission tho rail
roads rcnIird ,b,, IN, Ninpeso,, rate
was sn Inv that ~ was ,,ntisc,,orv
On this po,ut the ro,lrt To-day went into
:; c,nsidcr,bl, ,nalvsis ,f III. reports
on yoIun,ion submitted by IN. exner,s
before the Federal court below to show
,ha, tho tv, ron, r,tc was no, ,nn8s
c,tory ,,d nr,ctic,,lv brush.d .sid, all
,f tho ,,t.,,l,s = mad. an ~. v,Iu,,;or bv
,hc c>n,r,s
rho c,so ,I,ry -,,n tb. ,,ho, ,os.s
,r,oI,i,c tho .,,~a iu.u, v,s AROUND
-, ,i, s.,,,,,,,,.' So. a., ,,,,,,,,, 10,
A,,nn. ,,,, s,,tos ,r,r,ndia,nr, ,,,.r.
..,., u,i,h Vinraso,. ,,ur. I,.sn,r,
Arkansas. kentucky and Oregon. Many
''''''' "S7o' ''' W. 49, "pp'",'" AZ w.
''o'U ., "p' ms
!" 'N' "''''''' W auo,"
''o' o'' ''''" ~ ~ ''"' '"V' ''''
aP'"n' ''N '',''n''''c w W ''p"''
".'e' ''' "'ha'' VI Wv Saws ~ supp"
'" 'h' '"''e"''"'i 'h'' '"e ''",'N ''"
'ne P'"'' w So''''"' ''e" '"''' '"'oH'
even over INTERSTATE r"auS' ''oN' !a'
,"'' W O"', ''i .''' =,
hraska We're appointed on the committee
an" h''er s1"init'"" I" '"'e. III inv ""'
p'eihe ,ouSS A'eS'u'h' '" nso'' WI"
was 'heh tr"'eru"f oi Ne" Jersey was
n member or the Ccverpor> confer
ence.
Tho great interost in the case was
eyemulitiee to-day by th. presence in
the Suurerna Coi-i room of former
p-esideon r'ayt former SECRETARY ,f tn.
The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1913-06-10
~ ha, the Carriers Contend.

proptiat. to its territorial jurisdiction
and not opposed To- any acton thus far
taken 10y congress
-. -
' Wv
The int.rblending Of operations in the
conduct Of Interstate and local business
bN Interstate carriers is strongly pressed
on our attention " is urged that the
same right or way. terminals. rails.
bfilRes ana stations are provided Tor
both GLASSES oI traf1c mat the proper
t'oh ol each SORT or business varies from
year 10 wear anu indeed from daN 10
"'N 'tat no "'Visioh of the plah'' no
'Ppo' '"'hth' o' u ortWteh Interstate
, atf f"cai 'rat!h' can ne made to-uaN
WV" WI" noi" '"-n'oIro" 'h'' TER
Iu''"'S l"''l'fs anu connexions III one
''"'t "'' 'hc ''''le' eh''ie nusN'SS "h"
are 'l ''iheht oi Naiue win feSpcct I"
wy "."'' PROPERTY anu .nr oush''s ''i
'' '"'' 'e'ui ',,e~ are 'sS"'',
's''"N' w. 'it''' nh' vi 'n' 'a'l"r 'u"
'.,', W. "'N'ue" oN "'"'ts 'ua' ,armiS
,.,,,,. "''e WV" WV !" '" 'ne
49, ,., % ' au' s"o''" pe l'i
,,,, , ,,, ,. 80 49, &c &c
iinn nf ,,,.s ,,, W., i,,s, ,n,, i
,,, ,,l i,,, .ia,,,i -, -,
vail -, ,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,i -
in,, -, S,,. ,, Wv '''''''
"Th. f,r,., nt ,h.s.. ,,,,,.,,,.,t -
,n,si2.d H., ,h... . '., -, ,,
! like nature. by tn. .xtre,n. di,ilcult, ,,d
ntrirac> OF the calculations which must
y,,,in' -, r,,,s,,,, h,,,,,. %, :,
( pose ,r I.t,tuiu,rv IN. ,ctu,n -, u,,t.r
th.. carrier is properly entitled th.,.from
bui these considerations are Tor the
pra' tra' Judgment "r congress III de-
w. "'''"s ,ne 'N''t' VI '"e leEu'a',"h NEG
-. ',.'e ' w ~ "',
,,s, -, t,.,..,, , -, -
! situation has become such by reason of
me ihte' o'ehu'hs OF me interstate 'nd m
! that ac.auat. regulation OF their inter.
! states rates "aunO, Il. maintained without
! imposing requirements with respect 10
'he'I ln'ras'a'e rates whi'n suos'ahti'iiN
W" ~, ~ .o' '."s IS W u'
,tnn,,I .,,,h,,i,, ,,. ,,,.,rs,,,a .',,,,,,.,'..
AND us ,rs,ru,u.n,s ,h. m.asur. ~, ,b,
| regulation it should .upplv
"It is the function OF THIS cour, 10 in
! ,"rpre, and apply tn" law ALREADY enacted.
| bat not under tn" guis- Of construction
| 'u pl"Ni"e mo-" comprehensive s'hthe
! VI ~ '9 ,. " "
''' upo' - ,.,' r., -, ,h. - -, ,n..
Sf,te enacted wi,hin ,h. seld whi,h II q
! .p,i,Ied TO occupy until us authority is
limited through III. es.r,ion by Congress
of IT. paramount con stitutlonsl power.
R.t,r..a Valuation Standards.
IN cohSuer'he 'he ISSUE aS 10 "ne'he'
me rates hNeu 'S 'he s'a'e oi MIME
sofa were cohnsea'otN Justice husheS
made some interesting OBSERVATIONS on
the standards to be applied IN ascer-
| 'aih'"s phNS"d' Na'""''o''' "'a'e'
that Is now OF great national impor-
tanCe Oh account Of the legislat ion 10y