The daily banner. (Cambridge, Md.) 1897-2008, 1913-11-11
COURT PROCEEDINGS
Term Likely To Be OF Unusually
Short Duration-Grand Jury To
Finish Tomorrow.

expected developments, the NOVem.
Der term of the Circuit Court fol-
this county is likely to be the
shortest held for a number of years
The Grand Jury is expected to
complete it's work tomorrow, while
so slack was the work in Court to-
day that the members of the Petit
Jury were dismissed until tomor-
row. This condition was quite I'M
expected, both to the Court and to
the members of the bar, for the
docket revealed a large number of
cases to be taken up, but by rea-
sons of settlement, postponement or
other conditions, these have dwin-
died to a small number to come up
at this term.
The docket, however, revealed
the following cases:
Appearances.
Pittsfield Spark Coil Co. VS.. E.
w. Stevens Co. Joyce and Hearn
for the plaintiff, and E. C. Har-
rington for the defendant.
Glass Journal Co., same as above.
VIM. F. Applegarth VS.. Benjamin
Wiley. w. F. Applegarth, Jr., for
the plaintiff
Louise Stine, through VIM. N.
Andrews, VS.. Carol Abbott.
Edith Solarzam, through T. Sangs
ton Insley, VS.. Jas. T. Robinson, rep
resented by E. G.. Harrington and
V. Calvin Trice.
Dorchester National Bank, by w.
Laird Henry, VS.. Arthur o. German.
Jos. B. Corkran, administrator of
John R. Corkran, deceased, by E.
c. Harrington, VS.. Francis P. Cork
ran and wife, represented by w.
Irving Mace.
The J. R. Richardson Co., through
T. Sangston Insley, VS.. VIM. w.
Robinson.
The J. R. Richardson Co., by
T. Sangston Insley, VS.. Margaret A.
Marshall, garnishee of VIM. w.
Mitchell, Mill Remnant Co. VS.. R.
w. Bennett and wife and w. S. Eli
lis and wife, trading as Bennett &
Ellis; Insley for plaintiff.
Margaret A. Phillips, by T. s..
Insley, VS.. w. H. Houston, suit per-.
tanning to the estate of Mrs. Susan
S. Simmons, deceased.
Margaret A. Phillips, by same
counsel, VS.. Major T. Simmons, ct
al, suit pertaining to same.
Harry P. Griffith and VIM. G.
Collins, trading as Griffith &
by w. Laird Henry, VS..
]. Dolby.
The same VS.. Ellwood Andrews,
garnishee of Hiram J. Dolby.
Geo. w. Woolford and Gordy B.
Smith, trading as Woolford &
Smith, by w. Laird Henry, and W.:
Irving Mace, vs. Arthur o. German.
two cases.
Maryland Agricultural Chemical
Co., by T. Sangston Insley, VS.. o.
W. Hubbard, represented by e. CT.
Peoples National Bank of Lynchs
burg, Va, by Joyce and Hearn. rs.
Francis e. Hastings.
Dorchester National Bank, BY
Laird Henry. VS.. Jas. P. Haggett.:s
Clay M. Webb. by Frederick III.
Fletcher, VS.. Martin Henry.
D. Landreth Seed Co., by Joyce.
and Hearn, VS.. Winfield Webster
& Co., represented by Frederick H..
Fletcher.
]. H. Shields & Co., by w. T..
Mace, VS.. Jos. B. Andrews. "a
G. A. Thompson & Sons, by j..
Watson Thompson, VS.. Arthur o.
German, two cases.
The Easton Wholesale Grocery.
Co., by Geo. H. Dawson, VS.. Hub
bard & Bramble.
Geo. w. Woolford and Gordy B.
Smith, Woolford & Smith, by W..
Laird Henry, VS.. School Board of
Dorchester county, represented by
and Insley.
Same against the Building Com
mittee of the East New Market
High School; same counsel.
Geo. A. Thompson & Sons, by J.
Watson Thompson, VS.. School Com
of Dorchester county,
garnishee of A. o. German, Harring-
ton and Insley for the School Com