The evening world., 1913-10-10

staalarAs % as% senyiy Win
yours, you caAnot invsaeA saA -.
move . puSiis oAeaai for last ef
gooa taste
'You cannot tmpeach and remove
from political once . man for immoral
ity. Notwithstanding the learned argu-
ment Of ny friend. Judge Parker. II .
candidate 10 wealthy. these contrfbd.
tions are ordinarily made 10 him. ~
hs Ia . candidate who 10 supposed to be
in poor or straitened circumstances.
those contributions are made to help
him out.
Public men in the past have not been
above receiving assists nee from wesathy
friends. The Boston merchants kept
wetster in pubic ihe. Jefferson re-
oeived gifts. Charles james Fox was
Kept IN public life oy g,ft8 rsceived
MoKinlsy's deSts wsrs paid on that he
might bsc0ns . candidate for the Prss-
idenoy.
with these exampiss before him 10 \
any wonder that . man Of the respond
ent's training. method Of thousht. lack Of
business ha6dts. financial necessities,
thought there was no harm In using the
money that had bssn given 70 him. not
only for the purpose of the campaign, but
also 70 aid and assist him IN repairing
his broken foftunssi Many Of these con-
tributions were evidently Intended TO -
iisve him from financial embarrassment
not only during ne campaign, but during
the time when ne should como into thii
great once.
Using moneys % given to him for his
own purposes and uses was not Q be-
trayai Of any cause or any principle.
None of the contributors ever expected
that the money would BE- returned 70
them. They were absolute gifts % him,
no matter for what purposs TO Be used.
Certainly no fault can bs found with
him ~ instead Of usinS such n,oasy 70
buy votes with. he used II TO 6ly sooo,es,
or for any other purpose that would b
beneficial to him.
cAuLs THE $4,000 PERsoNAl
oiFrS TO CULLEN.
Mr.. Herrick then ADDED up ths sistl
and loans that had been made 70 'ht
Governor a. purely personal. totaliins
$4,000.
Can YOU sAy." he ssksd "whioi
money went to me buying OF stocks? r.
my mind II docs not make any particular
difference You have all these fund
mixed. You cannot separate he cam
paign contributions from the loans an<
sifts. What went TO purchase 1toel,l
and what went 70 campaign expenses n,
one can tell. not even the Governor him
self.
'Dut Il 10 Aot asosssasy 70 sso-
afate them. I an not 9oaA6 70
argus before you sAat tAas neasy.
70 . coasiAssabls amouAA was net
used for The purchase q steeha.
There - no oxims n tAaA Unlsss
hs stole this money. xa1a1ly, ~
hsA Q r1ght 70 use IL 70 buy stoeka.
not sthieally. not N geeA snSes
bat - . matter Of Law.
What use was made OF those contf
buttons? That brinss W 70 the test
mony Of Mr.. Ryan. A little bit OF M
Ryan's evidence throws . hood Of li6t
upon this case-explalns many thlns'
We have not sought to bring the waf
Of the respondent into this case. IT hs
been our effort to keep her out. II wa
frst brought In. SO Tar as the evidenc
appears on the order that was given
Josephthai, signed by the defendant. fe
Mrs. Sulzer. Why? Because she ha
explained to him her trouble over
loan that Was pressing upon stocks thi
belonged TO her. Josephthal would n
talk business with . woman.
lie saw tho Governor and the Coz
ernor told him OF this loan upon stooi
that belonged to his wife. 80 when b
came to give the order for the stock
after the story that he had told
Josephthai, there was nothing else Il
him to do but to sign II as the ageI
for his wife.
No pretense was made that he nan
a ppeared in the Carnegie Trust Con
pany as a borrower. No claim II mad
that her name appeared with Harris
Fuller - . borrower. but the name I
William Sulzer borrowing money up<
her stocks.
SACRIFICED HIMSELF TO CAV
HIS WIFE.