The copper era and Morenci leader., 1913-11-21
DECISIONS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
 IMPORTANT
Many Civil Cases Have Been Settled and Others Advanced; Criminal
 Calendar Begins Today.


 and Others Advanced; Criminal
 Calendar Begins Today.
 The actions of the Superior Court have been of unusual importance this week, decisions havin been rendered in a number of civil cases of magnitude while other civil cases have been continued to later term The criminal calendar, which is ex- fensive, including several murder cases was called Friday morning, and promises to carry the Court into la bors of several weeks duration.
 The grand and trial jurors will be drawn Saturday morning, Nov. 22. The grand jury will meet Wednesday December 3rd.
 Decisions in Civil Cases.
 In the case styled D. E.. Address vs. Leonardo Sanchez, the action be- ing for a foreclosure, an order of dismissal was entered in pursuance with the motion of E. E.. Wall, attor- sney for the plaintiff.
 Upon the payment by the defend ant of $5,000, order of dismissal was entered in the case of Reuben Mo Donald against the Detroit Copper Mining company. In this suit, which was for damages, L. Kearney was for the plaintiff and E. E. Ellinwood, of Bisbee, was for the defendant.
 Myrtelle Towns was granted a di- vorce from Harvey L. Towns. l.. Kearney was attoreny for the plain tiff.
 Chas. w. Judy was granted a di- vorce from Sarah Mildred Judy. l.. Kearney was attorney for the plain tiff.
 R. N. Buck was granted di- vorce from Carolyn Buck. E. V. Horton was retained by the plaintiff.
 n inc fnrnQI0GUra a mortgage was this week entered in the case of T. M. Richardson vs. J. A. Smith. In this case the plain tiff was seeking the recovery of an automobile sold by himself some months since to the defendant. E. V. Horton was retained by the plaintiff, and E. E. Wall was attor- ney for the defendant.
 Mrs. L. G. Ross was granted a di- vorce from l.. G. Ross. E. B. Wall was attorney for the plaintiff.
 Josefa Zapato de Valdez was grant ed a divorce from Angel Valdez. E. ". Horton was attorney for the plain tin.
 A divorce was granted this week to sGeorgie Jones against Wm. l.. Jones. E.. V. Horton was attorney for the plaintiff.
 The decision of Judge Laine, in the case of Greenlee County vs. Ed FL rage, was that the defendant pay the amount prayed for by the plaintiff, this being the amount of bond by Elrage to secure to the County the appearance of a prisoner accused of larceny.
 Civil Cases Continued.
 The case of Luz Ochoa vs. The Arizona Copper company, in which the plaintiff was praying for dam- ages, an order was entered for the oG term, which will be in February of next year.
 An order for continuance was made tin the following cases:
 First National Bank of Clifton vs. the Clifton Armory.
 The case of the Bank of Duncan vs. D. c. McLennon. Mcfarland and Hampton are for the plaintiff.
 Jas. V. Parks vs. Geo. Webster, ct al Mcfarland and Hampton are for the plaintiff, and l.. Kearney is for the defendant.
 Richard Kain vs The Arizona Cop per company, the case being a suit flor damages. l.. Kearney is for the plaintiff, and Mcfarland and Hamp- ton are for the defendant.
 Chas. Walthen and Company vs. being an action on a note w. K Dial is for the plaintiff. D. E. Address against F. H. Rem ick. This is an action for the pos session of property. L.. Kearney is for the plaintiff, and Mcfarland and Hampton are for the defendant. Alexander Chavez against the Shan | tion for damages. L. Kearney is for | the plaintiff, and Armstrong and | Lewis are for the defendant. Vennie Sliger against John Sliger | This is an action for divorce. E. V. | Horton is attorney for the plaintiff
 I. B. English against R. G. Mur- rillo. This case was not at issue, as no answer had been filed by the de- fendant. 1 Jos. Scott against Lucia Baria de | Scott. This is an action for divorce. l.. Kearney is for the plaintiff.
 Pedro Lascurain against the Shan non Copper company, in which the plaintiff asks for damages. L.. Rear ney is for the plaintiff, and Armstrong & Lewis are for the defendant.
 Richard Silvas against The Ari- zona Copper company. Through L. Kearney, attorney for the plaintiff, | the case was dismissed in the Super for Court of this county, and has been li filed in the United States Court at l Phoenix.
 w. c. Crawford against B. F. Bill kingsley, an action for damages, in which w. R. Chambers is for the plaintiff and Jno. R. Hampton is for the defendant.
 Santos Delgado against the Arizona & New Mexico Railway company, in which damages are asked, with Wall and Kearney for the plaintiff, and Mo ; Farland is for the defendant. lt J. Rocco Zappia against Noah l Stokes, in which the payment of a ' debt is asked. This is an appeal |