The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1913-09-25

that the court did grant his wife alimo-
ny" On page %: The divorce was
given and the alimony granted Mrs.
Russell. Russell had considerable prop
erty in his own name. He tried to
practice fraud upon his wife by trans
ferring his property to corporations and
societies over which he himself had alb
solute control. Referring to this fact
the court said: THE purpose of this
whole transaction was to deprive his
wife of her dover and interest and was
a fraud upon her."
He refused to pay it. His wife had
to ask the court to compel him to pay
it. Then he fled to another state, MAX
ing it necessary for his wife to get an
eXtradition order, which she did. and
which led to the condemnation of the
cunning Pastor by third court and the
increase of the alimonv.
But in the face of all this and more
that | might mention, he has the eff
4iCisSCA W ocf III lOCA HdpCA liluN AiAo
wife never got divorce. Yet this is
the man that poses as martyr; that
claims special special knowledge and
light; that denounces ministers as hyp-
ocrites and false teachers; that poses as
the only true exponent of the Scrip
lures; that ridicules the doctrine of the
Trinity and says that Constantine put it
in the Nicean Creed. We need not
wonder at this for he evidently knows
as little about church history as he
does about Greek and Hebrew, and as
for truth he seems to have but slight
regard for it.
What can be said or thought Of man
who will deliberately swear to one thing
on the witness stand and when grilled
is compelled to admit the opposite. Is
such man worthy of credence? Is he
a safe person to follow religiously or
any other way? Yet this is the man
who can deny the Eternal Sonship of
Christ; vino makes Him created be-
ing; who brings Him to the cross and
annihilates Him; who then has Him
resurrected and as a reward for service
makes Him a god; who belittles the
work of the Holy Spirit; who eliminates
future punishment, except for a few
obstreperous ones; who laughs at the
idea of hell, though Jesus and the Apos-
ties taught its existence IN language
that cannot be misunderstood; who Is
misleading his followers: who spends
freely the money poured into his Golfers;
who keeps himself in the lime light, his
face in the papers and his false teach
ing before the public through the col
umns of newspapers. But money can
get almost anything.
| notice the original Stoner miracle
wheat at the front again and offered to
farmers of the country for from So to
So per bushel, which is good deal more
than its actual worth. In 1908 the De-
partment of Agriculture experimental
with this so-called miracle wheat on its
farm at Arlington. 1t says: 'In yield in
the nursery rows it compared as follows
with the Fultz wheat, viz: Miracle,
lowest yield per row was X ounces,
highest Weld 10 ounces. While the
highest yield per row of the Fultz
wheat was 20 ounces. This would allow
approximately a yield of SO bushels for
miracle and 66 bushels for the Fultz
wheat"
The above is from the report of the
Department given to the Brooklyn Ea-
gle. There is absolutely no miracle
about it. Why not be honest about it
and give the exact truth and say it is
good wheat but not so good as some
other varieties.
have tried in all fairness and kind
ness to warn the public against the per-
nicious teachings of Russellism, which
is contrary to the teaching of Gods
Word. ! have done my duty and now
leave it with the hope that the Lord
will have mercy upon the man who
fathers it, and save all from the seduc-
tive snarcs of his heresy.
| thank YOU for your favor.