Wood County reporter. [volume] (Grand Rapids [i.e. Wisconsin Rapids], Wis.) 1857-1923, 1913-07-17
.ATERAL NO. 4 OF DIVISION B


ter line of which ditch is described
as follows: Commence at a point
rods south of the NE corner of the
NWA of the NEA of Sec. 20, Twp.
u N, R. E., thence east parallel
to the north line of sections 20 and
Fl in same Twp. and range 1860 feet.
Said ditch to have an average depth
Of s feet, a bottom width of s feet.
and side slopes 1 to 1.
LATERAL NO. > OF DIVISION B.
Deepen and enlarge Div. B from the
junction with Div. A in the NJ of
the NWA of section IS, Twp 20 n,
R. E., to a point where said ditch
crosses the north line of section q.
Twp. q N, R. E. The reconstruct
ed ditch to have an average depth
of s feet, a bottom width of Il feet
from its junction to station 81 and a
bottom width of feet from Station
54 to the N line of said Sec. q,
and side slopes l to 1.
LATERAL NO. 1 OF DIVISION A.
Extend lateral No. 1, Div A from
its. present upper terminus north 1900
feet to point 3 rods south of the
south Is line of section &c Twp. q
N, R. E., said extension to have
an average depth of 6 feet, a bottom
width of feet and side slopes 1 to
1.
LATERAL NO. Z OF DIVISION A.
Construct ditch to be known as
Lateral No. Div. A, the center line
of which ditch is described as fol-
lows: Commence at a point ON lat
eral ditch No. l of Div. A, rods
north of the north line of lot s,
Sec. 4, Twp. 20 N, R. 4 E., thence
run east about 5000 feet, to a point
due south of the southwest corner of
Sec. "a, Twp. q N, r. E., thence
north about 5000 feet to lateral ditch
No. l A, thence NE along lateral ditch
No. A, to the east and west Il line
of said section "a, thence east along
said quarter line of Sec. "a, $500 fee
said ditch to have AN average depth
Of 6 feet, a bottom width of feet
and side slopes 1 to 1.
LATERAL NO. l OF DIVISION A.
Deepen and enlarge Lateral
Number /, Division A, from
its junction with hte main Gram
berry Creek Drain to a point rods
Sec. 3, Twp. 20 n, R. E., a. dist
ance of about 1900 feet, the re con-
structed ditch to have an average
depth of fest, a bottom width of
| feet and side slopes l to 1.
LATERAL NO 8 OF DIVISION A.
| Construct a ditch to be known as
lateral ditch No. of Div. A, the cen
ter of said ditch being described
as follows: Commencing at a point
ON lateral ditch No. 2 of Div A, 3
rods west OF the north and south a
| line of section %, Twp. q N, R. 4
| g., thence run north parallel to the
said Il line 200 feet said ditch to
have an average depth of Z feet, a
bottom width of feet and side
slopes 1 to 1.
| LATERAL NO. 2 OF DIVISION A.
Deepen and enlarge lateral NO. 2
of Div. A, its entire length, the re-
| constructed ditch to have an average
depth of feet, bottom, width of
feet and side slopes l. to 1.
MAIN CRANBERRY CREEK DRAIN.
| Extend the Main Cranberry Creek
| Drain, from it's present upper termin-
us, north to the N. lime of section
%, Twp. 81 n, R. E. Said extern
SIGN to have an average depth of 8
ieet, a bottom width of feet, and
side slopes L to L.
LATERAL NO. 9 DIVISION A.
Construct a ditch to be known as
| Lateral Ditch No. 9 of Div A, the
center line of which ditch is describ-
ed as follows. Commencing at a point
on the Main Cranberry Creek Drain
where same crosses the east and west
quarter line of section 20, Twp. q
| ~, r. E., thence run east on the
same Il line, $3.50 feet, said ditch to
have an average depth of 6 feet and
bottom width of feet, and side
slopes 1 to L.
LATERAL NO. 10 DIVISION A.
Construct a ditch to be known as
| lateral No. 10 of Div. A, the center
line of which ditch is described as fol
lows: Commence at a point on the
Main Cranberry Creek Drain 3 rods
north of the south line of section 5,
Twp. 20 N, R. E., thence east para
| llel with the said south line of sec
ton to a point rods west of the
| Sc corner of the SWA of the SEA
of said Sec. 5, thence north parallel
to the east Is line of said section
1860 feet, said ditch to have an a.
verage depth of feet, a bottom wild
tn of 6 feet, and side slopes l to /.
az That the cost of construction
of said new work and engagements
and of the additional bridges that
said district must build, they esti-
mate will cost $50, 821OO, and
90 That the cost of construction
already assesses in said district to-
gether with the cost Of construction
by them proposed will exceed theben.
efits already assessed and confirmed
% the Court, and
60 That supplemental benefits as
sessed in and by said petition and
report against the benefited lands,
easements and corporations amount
to 1851, $4,000, and are warranted by
the proposed work;
% That they have determined
the damage that viii be caused by