Norwich bulletin., 1913-02-04

nlaintiffs in the case of Helen Jack son Hunt vs. Frederick l. Richardson, whose present whereabouts are un- known. Attorney Mum explained that the action was over the partition of a small parcel of property, valued at from $500 to $400. Attorney Mum said that the defendant had failed to take advantage or an opportunity to under the general statutes.
 Several uncoutested divorce cases were tried during the session. Mar tha w., Daley of Chaplin. now em- ployed at Middle Haddam, was grant ed a divorce from William J. Daley, recently of Willimantic. Mrs. Daley was represented by Attorney s. B. Harvey Mrs. Daley testified that she March g, 1909, and that after the mar riage had lived with her sister at North Windham for three weeks then at her fathers. Waterman Griggs, in Chaplin. Daley left his wife soon aft CT their marriage, she testified. They had no trouble, she said. She testi- fled that Daley was intoxicated much of the time after their marriage and that he has not lived with her since April. 1909 Witnesses corroborated Mrs Daley's testimony.
 Victoria Gosselin. represented by Judge A. G. Bill, was given a divorce from Jule Gosseifn, to whom she was married in Danielson on June 25, 1892,
 
 adultery and intemperance on the part of her spouse and in addition to her own testimony in the premises was sustained in her statements by sever al witnesses. She was given the custody of her sixteen year old son, Joseph.
 The case of Clifford l.. Williams, Norwich, granted divorce from Lucy l.. Williams formerly of East Killing ly, now in Rhode Island, had some surprising features. Williams, who is o Tla n man said that he is employed as a brakeman on the N. r., N. H. and H. R. R. lines. He married Mrs. Williams at East Killingly, September 29, 1908 They lived in DayviIle for a time and then he went to New London After a time he urged her to join him in that city. This she promised to do, but did not carry out her promise. She went back to her mother.
 There was something of surprise for those in the court room when Williams announced that although he had not lived with his wife for more than two years, the records in the town of Kiliingly show that a child was born to Mrs. Williams June 16, 1912. Williams said that information had come to him of the birth of the child and that upon n~investigation he found in the records at the town clerks of flee in DanielSOn an entry showing the birth of the child ons the date men toned. He also told of his further in vestigation of the matter and how on a visit to Moosup he found his wife living in tenement of the Aldrich Manufa curing company, No. 23, and that man whose name is given in the birth certificate as father of the baby born last June, which baby was there in the house at the time of Williams visit seemed quite at home; in the tenement.
 Dr. George Barnes of Dayville was shown photograph of the faithless Mrs. Williams and identified the picture as that of a woman whom he was called to attend last June when she was about to deliver a child, which he said was a female. Judge Shum- way granted the decree.
 May Ellen Marshall of Killingly was granted a divorce from Edward David Marshall of Ausable Forks, N. '. The plaintiff was represented by Judge Harry B. Back of Danielson On September l, 1898, the couple were married at Montville, Conn. The grounds alleged in the action was cruelty. Mrs. Marshall was granted a change of name to May Ellen. Adams.
 Claude Linberg of this city was granted divorce from George Lin berg now of parts unknown. The ground was desertion. The plaintiff was represented by Attorney Charles l.. Torrey.