The Richmond Virginian. (Richmond, Va.) 1910-1920, 1913-10-01
MRS. SUFFERS NAME

Continued from First Page.)
ard cannot be proven ny me If II Is
true, you will hase no trouble in prov
ing it. as the books of the Carnegie
Trust company must be a matter of
record
Linked with this testimony. In the
opinion Of the prosecution. goes the
order which Mr.. Suixer wrote TO Har
ris & Fuller on July IA last whereby
Lieuteuant-Co l.. NJ Joseph
thai. the governors naval aide, as
sumed MIR Suffers account with the
brokers by paying $4,000 cash and
receiving batch of securities inciud-
ing the Big Four stock, TO which the
governor was SO partial. That order
was signed william Sulzer for Mira
sulzer." But Mr.. Fuller testified to-
day for the second time that the account
was not Mira suffers and that this was
the first time he had heard her name
In relation thereto.
Broker Fuller on Stand.
Melville b. Fuller. Of the brokerage
firm of Harris n Fuller. occupied the
witness stand throughout the morn
ing session except when Chester G,
PIatt. Governor Suffers private sec.
reta~y. was called TO identify "DeaI
Dr. Brown" letter, which Will be put
INTO evidence later.
Mr., Fuller's testimony Of the NOM
ing was largely repetition Of what
he said before the Frawley commit
tee though the managers brought out
more and earlier details and ham
rncred Justify to get every statement
Of the witness into the official record
and before the impe achment court
The inquiry went away back TO the
opening OF then Representative Sui
GERS account with Fuller Il Harrison
on March Is. 1870 Before the morn
ing was over they had brought It down
TO July. 1913.
Mr.. Fuller was phalanxed by still
more volumes at the opening of the
afternoon session. Mr.. Kresel plunged
again into the career of Suffers ac-
count in the brokerage Office as No
SO, II was closed on July I6. 1913,
and on that day the debit balance was
$40. 1871, leaving margin-af about
$500 over and above all Indebtedness
Before the account was closed Cover
nor Sulzer over the telephone referred
his former business partner. also Of
ll5 Broadway. And on July Sth he
sent this card 10 one of the partners;
What Governor Spriggs said is
agreeable to me-"
What MIR, sEriggs had said was tina,
he would aid in having Governor Sui.
ger close his account. The agree.
able" message was not accepted be-
cause Harris Il Fuller insisted on hav.
ing more definite order from their
customer.
ON July 18th, new emissary In
the person Of Lieutenant Commander
Josepthal Of the governors staff, a
member Of the stock exchange house
Of Josepthal Toucheim & Co.
brought this card from Governor Sui
yer.
Please carry out the suggestion of
the bearer. Commander hospital"
Agreement Reached.
The suggestion Of the bearer was
that account No, 63 should be trans
ferred from Governor Sulzer to MIR.
JoaepthaL Again th4ss Was of no avail.
then, but on July / th. Com ulander
Jostpthal finally presented an order
which the brokers considered proper
1t follows:
New York. July IA, 1919.
> Messrs. Harris & Fuller.
New York city
COMMUNICATIONS deliver to
Lieutenant Commander l.. VI. Jo-
septhal the securities now held as
collateral in my loan upon the pay
ment II the balance due thereon
Yours truly,
WILLIAM SEI.ZER,
For MRS. SULZER"
Mr. Kresel read this order and
made note Of the fact that under the
name William Sulzer appeared
this, For Mrs. Sulzer." The witness
said he did not know Mrs. Sulzer and
that TO his knowledge she had no
with the firm. MT
Marshall objected TO this, but Judge
Cullen allowed Mr. Fuller TO answer
for himself. but not for the other
members Of his firm
Is there any entry upon the books
" Harris 81 Fuller in connection with