Daily Kennebec journal. [microfilm reel] (Augusta, Me.) 1870-1975, 1913-04-07
MAINE LEGISLATURE.
CONTINUED from Page SiX.)

Nanu, appellant, same offence.
@. 3o55? y. State VS.. Hannah McDon-
ough, appellant. same offence.
Q. 3057? \. State VS.. Franw Napoli-
tame, appellant, same offence.
Q. 305S? A. State vs.. Martin A. Nor
ton, appellant same offffense.
@. 1853? A. State VS.. Richard j. Nor
ton, appellant same offcnse.
9. @06o? \. State vs.. Martin O'Don-
nell. appellant, same offense.
g. %06l9 \. State vs.. Robert OLSEN,
appellant, same offcnse
q. 3oG2? y. State Us. Rosa Pacific
appellant, same offcnse
q. %o63? a. State Us. Rosinna Pesio,
appellant. same offensc.
q. 306i? \. State vs.. Petro Pita, ap-
pcllant same offonse
Q. &o61? y. State VS.. Mary Riley, APP
pcilant same offence
Q. 306S? \. State vs.. Pietro Sarappo
appellant. same offence.
g. CO.'S? \. State vs. Cangetta Tira-
bassi. appellant. same offence.
q. 800? \. State VS.. Joseph Vacchino,
appellant. same offence
q. $oS9? a. Same respondent, appel
amt. sane offence.
q. 3oSl? \. State vs.. John Walsh. APP
pclant, same offence.
q. a"S2? ~ State VS.. John T.. Winters,
appellant. sane offence.
q. Do those names which / lave read
and which you have stated appear upon
your docket CONSTITUTES the record of the
superior court for the January term of
this year. of all LIQUORS appealed cases
coming from any lower court in Cum
bertrand county to the superior court
y. They do. - .,-t
q. Now villa igqra 70 ail3 3qd see
If correctly fSaid it's5s H. Of e3ql' 9fs Of
STATE rs. the R1s eGS,968de nEl Who's. NAMES
l will read, and in. e3cA, lJst9nGc The
offence chareed. ,asaEls4 each is a liquor
nuisance. 3ilS. NYfn .tlleh. &lla Fred
". Brown; $l2q,., P4tr.ek tallan, Si2l
james Cassidy; 3l2e. John conroy: 3123.
John Curtan, ETA Thomas 4. currier;
Sl2s, John Dixon; Sl26, Joseph L. Dow
3l27, James Durant 3l28. Louis Fcury;
3129, Michdel Flynn. $3.50. Michael Foley
Sewell a. Brown; 3l3l. John Foster; 1892
Louis Fourier. 1888. Angus Gallant; 1884,
J. eyrus Gallant: 3135. Rosina Gernano:
1856 E.dw Gilman: s1@7. rohn Girard; Sl3s,
James Hanlon; @1ea. Annie joyce: Sfi0,
Charles E. Kcarns; 3Hl. james Kcrri-
gan 3li2 Gordon Barose; 3l43, Martin j.
o'Donncn and John \. Void: 3l4 Peter
s. Mcdonald: 3li5, Robert Olson; BIG,
Joseph vacchino; Eli John Walsh.
Do those names that Rave last read
constitute the list Of indictments re-
turned bg the grand Jury sitting at the
January 1919. term OF the superior
court and the fun list of liquor indiet-
ments? \. For the crime of nuisance.
yes sir
q. We're there any other liquor in
dctments returned except for nuisance"
Do You recall that counsel and yourself
went over the docket within 4 few days
to ascertain that fact? \. No. | didn't.
Q. Didn't someone go over the docket
within a few days. A. No
q. Wasn't 9au present? y. l was
present when Mr.. BODICE made some ex-
animation of the docket. but | neither
verified nor had anything Ia. 80 with,
what he did. other than 10 talk with him
on what he was doing.
Q. Do You find any other indictments
for inflactions of the liquor law re-
turned by the grand jury sitting for the
January term 1913. except these thirty
nuisance indictments | have Just read?
a. | do not.
Mr.. CLEAVES; The understanding is
that while the papers themselves of
course, arc offered, nor will they be adj
missii,ic they can be mutually used by
counsel at any time.
cross-cx animation by MIR. Gulliver.
So that il may be plain to the eonven-
ton. Mr. Galley. pleas tell the number
of Appealed eases entered in the SUI
per.lor court. 1911. relating to intoxieat-
ing liquors. y Well. ! should have 10
add them up, on the docket. My recol-
lection is there were eighty-four.
q. Eighty-four appealed cases? y.
Yes. appealed for all causes
ATTORNEY GENERAL WILSON:
You mean 1912?
Mr.. CULVER: Yes. 1872.
The WITNESS: shall have 10 count
these as | 80 alons. | have made no
examination Of these doctcts along
these lines.
@. didn't know but they were num-
bercd in such a way you could tell
the number. i",St'i '''f'
IL is agreed between counsel that at
the September term OF the superior
court there were entcrcdH2S aipeais in
liquor cases, and there were found Il
indictments. and9tiiatFat the January
term, 1913. there we're IS appealed cases
relating to Intoxicating liquors and 30
Indictments found for infringement of
the Liquor law.
4 "a. Have you made up list of the
fines imposed in liquor cases at the
january term, 1918, Mr. Gatleya n. l
have.
@. vii! you tell the total of fines
collected at the January term, 1913? A.
In liquor, cases?
@. Yes. A.>There were collected for
fines and costs in liquor cases six thou
sand six hundred and ten dollars and
seventy cents.
@. And viii you give the convention
the same information in respect to the
SEPTEMBER term, 1912? A. AT the Sep
TENDER term, 1912, there were collect
ed in fines and costs in liquor cases,
$2217 So.
@. Mr. Galley, is it a fact that your
duties as clerk of the superior court
i eauire your attendance in court, each
day when criminal cases are disposed
of? y. Each minute.
@. And the fines are paid over to you
I>o A ThnV ~