The Arvada enterprise., 1913-12-18

interstate commerce coluihi9'oH W
Alaska coupled with speclai pro-
vision that the rates for steamship
TRANSPORTATION to and from the terri
tory shall be regulated Inc asser-
ton is made that water transportation
MONOPOLY has been one of the chiet
causes for the control of Alaskas re-
sources by one great syndicate
Shuts Out Monopolies.
The contemplated Legislation pro-
yides for the location OF town sltes.
The ACQUISITION of land for monopoly
holdings is prohibited and no person
or corporation can acquire land 1or the
purpose of holding it in ldleness. Inc
nroponents of the measure say that
every safeguard has been taken to pre-
vent the exploitation of Alaska for
the profit of monopolies. and that the
field will be found to be open Tor
competitive strivings.'
Under the terms of the Dill the
president is authorized at his descre-
ton to take over the holdings or rail-
roads already in operation IN Alaska.
Any property belonging to the United
States now in use in Panama canal
construction and which can be of serv-
ice in Alaska will be transferred from
the canal strip to the territory, to be
used in railroad building when the en-
gineers on the Canal Zone declare that
their work is finished. The financial
provisions of the bill instruct the Sec
retary of the treasury to borrow $685.
Gil 900 on the credit of the United
States and to issue bonds in the de-
nominations of S1OO to $1,000. The
sum of S1,OOO,OOO is set aside for ad
ministration purposes.
Good Roads Favored.
Before long congress expects
report from it's joint committee on
federal aid in the construction of
post roads. 1t is believed by the
members that legislation for a gov
ernment appropriation for highway
building throughout the country will
be made an administration matter,
and enacted into law with the sane
tion of both houses with very rev
signs of division on party lines. The
several states, in order to secure gov
ernment aid in road building, will be
called upon to appropriate their pro
rata share of the money.
The Joint committee has Jonathan
Bourne, Jr., as its chairman. Mr..
Bourne is no longer in congress, but
he still retains his committee memf
bership. He has formulated his own
plans for coed roads and his example
has been followed by Senator Swan
son Of Virginia and by Representative
Shackleford of Missouri.
The members who have interested
themselves in this matter of improved
highways have founo it exceedingly
easy to build good roads on paper,
particularly so as the paper used as
the paper used as the basis of ad-
vance construction has the treasury
note formula printed on its lace.
Money is needed TO build good roads.
and it is the matter of cash, lot OF
cash. which blocks the progress OF
building and possibly, only possibly.
may block the future quick progress
of wagons and automobiles. Generally
speaking. however, the sentiment for
better means of communication
through the country is strong in both
houses of congress, and the cry OF
economy will not serve to check the
movement
Bourne's Ambitious Plan.
The plan OF former Senator Bourne
is ambitious. He would like to have
the government issue $1,00O,0 100000 in
bonds, the issue and the sale mot to
exceed such amounts as may be nee.
essary from time to time to enable
the treasurer of the United States to
make payments from the United States
highway fund to the several states in
accordance with the provisions of this
act"
1t is a part of Mr.. Bourne's plan to
have the money accredited to the
states in proportion to their total land
area, their population, their assessed
valuation of taxable property. and the
total mileage of public highways. On
the basis of appropriations amounting
to 81 100000 900, and provided that all
the requirements of the act shall be
complied with. the different states will
get large sums of money varying of
! course WltN lne size anu wealth. Oh tue
commonwealths. Illinois. for instance,
would get about s40000.00O, while its
neighbor state, Missouri, would get
about $35 900 900 sums which it would
seem would build several miles of fair
ly good roadway.
What Shackleford Proposes.
Representative Shackleford, who Is
member of the joint committee, has
allowed some of his views on the sub.
ject to be known in advance of the
committees report. He has no such
vaulting money-spending ambitions as
those which seem to be lodged in MIR.
Bourne's head. 1t is probable that his
views more nearly coincide with those
of the average member of congress. In
truth It Is likely that Mr.. Shackleford' $
scheme, which he already has put into
bill form, will be found to agree pret'
ty closely with the provisions of the
good roads measure as 1t finally re-
/ ,akuna tho n,tfpp pf tho ttyn hpnuaG