Daily Kennebec journal. [microfilm reel] (Augusta, Me.) 1870-1975, 1913-04-07

do
And are there any other matters
upon your September docket on appeal
from any lower court in Cumberland
county? A. For any other offences?
@ Have you now read all the liquor
appeals upon the September&S docket?
A. Yes, sir. All the liquo~s appeals
have been read
Q, What is 2927. A. That is an in
dictment against Fred Bouthlett.
q. For what offence? A. Nuisance
Q. 29s9? A. That is an Indictment
against Edward Burnett, Nuisance.
Q. 1883? A. That is Jan Indictment
against George Cliff for Nuisance. zsff.s
Q. 2937? A. That is an Indictment
against James Cummings, nuisance
Q. 2947? A. That is an Indictment
against Thomas Forth, nuisance
Q. 294S? a. Indictment gainst
Frank Foster. nuisance
Q. 295l? a. Indictment against
James Hallaran, alias Holloran. NUS
ance
Q, 996S? A. Indictment against Will
liam f. Meaher, nuisance
Q. 2974? A. Indictment against
Catherine Quirk. nuisance
O. 1913? A. Indictment against
William p. Rush, nuisance
e. 29so2 A. Indictment against
Peter Suluk. nuisance.
=. 29sf2 A. Indictment against
Norris Vinck. nuisance.
q. 1856? A. Indictment against
William WEIGH and Patrick OMalIey.
nuisance.
q. Those records which you have
read include all the indictments which
IN any way relate to the violations of
the liquor law as returned by the grand
Jury at the September term. LAST
"A. You mean that We're found by the
grand jury al that term?
q. Yes A. That is all that we're
fonnd By the grand jury at that term.
q VIII you now take your January
docket of this year and turn to No. ae9a
and read the total of the record and the
offenee charged? a. 2999. State Us.
Angelina April. appellant. 7unlawful pos
session of intoxicating liquors
Q. 3o062 A. State VS. Henry 7.
baldwin. appellant. unlawful possession
of Intoxicating liquor
9. 300i? a. State VS. Fred Bouth-
lett, for same, appellant
G. 3002? A. State VS.. Fred W
Brown. appellant. for same.
O. 5000? a. State VS.. Sewan
Brown' appellant for same.
O. 1901? A State VS. Patrick cal.
lan illegal possession
@ Soaa? A State VS. James cas-
sidy, same offense
g 3oo6? A. State VS.. Thomas Cole
man, appellant. same offense
@ 1907, Forza Goscitta. same of
Tense? A. Yes cir
G. zoos? a. State VS.. Elizabeth q
Conley, same offense
Q. 309, this is the same resnonaent
and the same offence? A. Yes. sir
Q. 30l0? a. State VS.. John Conrov
same offence.
Q. 90l2? a. State VS.. Mary Crook. an
pellant, same offence
Q. S0l3? A. State VS.. John Curran
500 and costs paid. unlawful possession.
.. Dl4? y. state VS.. Thomas Currier.
appellant. same offence
Q. 30l5? A. State VS.. Sarah De Ross,
appellant, same offence
Q. 30l6? A. State vs. John Dizion an
pellant. same offence .4,4t.,f
Q. 30l1? A.. State VS.. William .pono-
van, appellant, sanIe offence. ,1aif,a ...t.,155
@. $OlS? a. State rs. Antoaio ,Hapta-.
tsfst
@. 9ol9? A.. Slaterys.7 Louis Feupy ..urar
lawful possession, appellant ssix4,S5,j
@. 30ao? A. State VS.. Michael Flynn,
appellant, same offence.
Q. 3022? A. State VS.. Winnie Foley,
appellant same offence
Q. 1923? A. State vs. Rozino Germauo
appellant, same offence. es.. 4 IL $50. 3
Q. 1924. that is the same respondent
and the same offence? A. Yes, sir. 50
Q. 3o25? A. State VS.. Mark Gould, APP
pellant. same offence.
Q. CO.'S? a. State VS.. DANES Green, ap.s
pellant, same offence. ~
Q. 1890? a. State vs. John ]. Griffin
appellant same offence. &.
@. 3oS1? A. State VS.. John II. Ham.
mond, appellant, same offence.
Q, 9OS2? a. state VS.. James Hanlon,
appellant, same offence.
Q. &352 y. state VS.. Patrick Hernon,
appellant. same offence 4,
Q. 3096? y. State VS.. John j. Higgins,
appellant, same offence s.,+ x
Q. 303i? a. State VS.. Peter j. Iollox-
wood, appellant. same offence &
@. @3s? a. State VS.. Frank. lllsley,
appellant. same offence ),
@. 1899? A. State VS.. Catherine JeI,~
nings, appellant, same offence.
@. S040? State VS.. Charles w. Johnson
appellant, same, offence.
@. BOIL? A. state VS. Annie Joyce. APP
pellant, same offence -,
Q. 30i2? A. State VS.. same respon,
dent. same offence. 10y
Q. sOiS? A. Same as the two proceed.
ing -
1904? A. State VS. Michael Kearney.
appellant, same offence. .,s..s.s-., n
Q. 3045? A. State VS. Charles Kearns.
appellant, same offence :,
Q. 3046? A. State VS. Charles Kearns.
appellant. same offence III
Q. 30i7? A. State VS.. James Kerrigan,
appellant, same offence. -
@. 304S? A. State VS.. Gordon Larose
appellant, same offence. =
Q. 1850? A. State VS.. Constantine
Mastrolucco. appellant same offence.
Continued on Page seven.) I'll.
iet9 94ae -, -, -