Daily Kennebec journal. [microfilm reel] (Augusta, Me.) 1870-1975, 1913-01-08
Interview With Editor Dingley,
Who Proves Concusivey that the Powers Of Plage Pro-
test the Technical Conscience

stion OF primary reputation and political ueaehefy:
"Why, my dear when PenroseP Peters partsan of the
powers of page capitalize the Stolen Emblem the Technical
Conscience of the System betrays the Silent Government of
the Steam Roller nules the Carpet Sweeper of The
Folks
That is true Mr. Dingley | confess had viewed
in that light before But how does it happen that your
proposition universally condemned by and people,
The trusted press perversey pursues the papatng
pie and the tremendously triumphant Tory triunvirae Pen
with piaging plumber the political pnfeathers plucked
from the fairly fat fowl of The Folks"
Yes you make it exceedingly clear. But don't you think
Progressive Republican legislators justified in refus
ing Judas Wasn't right redeem the Progressive
pledges abide by the Republican primary Wasn't it right
to sustain the twiceendered verdict of the people,:
Hale Penrose- Lieeld Guernsey Penrose Swasey
Adricl Bailey Cannon Penrose- Buregh Alen- SewaIope
Hchborn Curtis Irving Stetson Simpson Pen
rose Kinds Allen Ianes- Dngl Penrose Peters
Powers Portland Press Page- Prisms and
z Penrose'
4 must certainly concede the force Of that argument
evidently But why do you still persist in daily insult
ing and abusing gentleman who III fair and open tight
before the people, Is that Interpretation of The Square
Deal and of the slogan Thou Shalt Not Steal?
When the benevolent bael of the Shattered Party Idol
Canned Goods of the Camp of Secession into Chic
reformed Clusters of the Cruched Kingdom and the Maca
velan Iarceniers Titled Tory protest the Technical
Conscience of the Royal Family the Silent Systems Steam
Roller swiftly swipe the Stolen Emblem of the two to
which henceforh perversely blooms in political osshcaon
the partisan hower-pot of the powers of pilage
True, Mr. Dngey, But why do you continue to
load your columns with about Mr. Burleigh which
have repeatedly proven false Do you think the people
of Maine approve of that style of politics.
Sir Truth but a relative Stolen Emblem untitled
to fette my fattomless fantasy, which of the Tech
nca Conscience protests the of the Tweede
dee-dee.2 |&F
Splendid Mr. Dingley and clear crystal That explains
your story about the supeuou offer of the Secretary of State
ship Never again shall be called cock and built Dingey
ISM No. Cocks and bulls below but Dingley winks
Yes of your fahomess fantasies which the
truth is untitled eer But speaking of the Technical Con
science why it that to find your writings
science technical or otherwise?
All but consider how the Penrose penpusherS of the rus
fed Press plot with the powers of piage On OF my
last Thursdays issue column thus expressed it Much
eaten for redgeon by the System
because this State political page has capitalized nufed
law and rhetorical temperance beyond credbiy had
seen masquerade proceeding with pomp and political
under eyes
How glad am that came! My doubts vanish like the
melting already foresee your crushing answer to
those that your proposition has Disguised all honor
able men, including Democrats who like fair play and
decency
as Sir, Armageddon the noble Duke of York he had ten
thousand He marched them up to Damascus day
h and back to Jericho again.
n' Armageddon Damascus and echo How true they ring
Mr. Dingley and often you have rng them Oh that
might conound the powers of plage with your matchles
logic almost ashamed to ask you these further ques
tons. Why it, that in discussing the legislative action OF
the New Hampshire Progresves being advocated by
members of that party you carefully conceal the fact that
there primary election for United States Senator in
that State? Why suppress the fact that the Republican plat
form which Maine Progressves helped adopt and which
they later contained plank expressly pedging support
all Republican primary nominees? Why fail to mention
that the New Hampshire Progressives did not their
party convention expressly pledge their support to the Repub
can primary as they did in Maine? Why ignore the fact that
they did Maine prior the State election expressly
down resolution calling upon Republican Senatorial and
Congressional candidates define their political attitude? Why
fail that instead of working shoulder to shoulder with
the Progressive party New Hampshire the present Repub
Senatorial candidate that State strenuous opposed
that party throughout their State campaign, that members of
the New Hampshire Legislature did the least their
election the fact that for them vote for him,
and that the of New Hampshire voted with that
understandings?
your blush of shame all that entities YOU
The msrule of such plaged the emblem which