The Bridgeport evening farmer., 1913-01-31

particular favorite at Vassar College
and with the students and aIurnnae,
and that it tended to provoke discus
sion and reproach, to produce criti-
cism and rfdicule, and to depreciate
the college in the eyes of the public,
and an Injunction was sought The
bill was dismissed the court saying:
THE injurious effects, if any, of the
advertisements complained of are
They seem to me to be largely crea-
lions of fancy due to representative
ness and apprehension They are
lodged rather in a feeling of distaste
sar College for seeing it's name and
insignia, inferentialIy, at least, link
in any appreciable injury to it's tan
gfble property. have not felt and
cannot feel, that any one could think
less of this eminent institution by
reason of the acts of defendants recit-
ed in this bill; and Z believe it to be
beyond the power of this court to
take cognizance of the psychological
injuries recited.''
Injuries From Automobile Operat-
ed by Minor Son.-A kind and indu1-
gent father purchased an autom obi1e
for the general use of his family. It
was registered in his name, but the
only member of his family licensed to
operate it was his minor son. The
mother had permission to use the
machine whenever she desired, and
the son, at her request, was expected
ride when she wanted to go. On an
afternoon when the son was driving
the car with his mother, at her res
quest, plaintiff was injured by coli
Hsion with 1T under circumstances
which warranted a finding that the
son was negligent. In determining
for the injuries the court in Smith VS..
Jordan, g z Northeastern Reporter.
761, holds that the relation Of husband
and wife was such that the w ife's use
T111 ChfnG 3f the time not
her. business but the business of the
husband, and the son in operating the
doing so in furth erance of the faith
er's business, and he was therefore liz
able for the sons negligence.
yvbat ia indian Country? - The
grand jury of the United States for
the district of Montana indicted de-
liquor into the Flathead Indian Reser-
walton. He lived on the reservation,
and at the time of the alleged offense
was returning from MISSOURI to his
cif1c Railway Company. A special
officer of the Interior Department
having boarded the train, and having
found pint of whisky on defendants
person, arrested him and took him
back to GissouIa- As defendant was
charged with the introduction of Ii
attempting to Introduce it, the ques-
ton of his guilt depended on whether
he was in the Indian country at the
time of his arrest. The Supreme Court
of the United States in C1airmont VS.. |
United States 81 Supreme Court Re-
porter 1877, holds that the right of
way of the Northern Pacific Railway |
Company through the ,F1athead In |
dian Reservation was granted to it |
by Act July 2, 1864 s(13 Stat. at L. 8 IS,
367 c. 2170, and that the Indian title |
thereto was extinguished without res |
ervation by agreement of SepteIn Der |
q 1882: consequently the right of way
had been completely, withdrawn from |
the reservation, and defendant having |
the liquor in his possession on a train |
on such right of way, had not intro |
duced it into the Indian country
Boosting a Ndine.-.'How's the sale |
of stock coming on?'' inquired the first |
promoter. .re
'sSold 5000 shares this morning. said |
the second promoter.
almost SIX dollars Come ON and /
I'll brow you to lunch
''Wl1y do you keep me waiting on
this corner two hourS?' demanded the |
irate husband. You said you were |
merely going. to step in to see how |
Mrs. Ga.bbde was.
Well she insisted ON telling me-
Washington Herald
The glass dIled to the fbrin1. at night |
will hdI the brfn in the morning. |
New Orleans Picayune
WANT ADS. CENT A WORD.