Bismarck daily tribune. [volume] (Bismarck, Dakota [N.D.]) 1881-1916, 1913-02-16

explain that he was heartily in &C
cord with the sentiments Of the gen
tleman preceding him and when divi,
sion was asked on the motion to defer
it a found that there ere only 1G
favoring the motion. Senator Jacob.
son moved for an amendment that
would cut out the penalty clause, but
the motion was lost. AT $3.50 Hanley
moved that the senate adjourn and
when the chair declared the motion
lost, he asked for a roll call and there
were enough seconds to carry it. On
the roll call there were q ayes and %
nays, as follows:
Those voting aye were Messrs. Al.
brecht, Bond, Bonzer, Carter, Cashel
Davis, Hanley, Heckle. Hughes, Jacob.
son, kretcllmar, Lcutz, Llnde, Lofts.
gard, Mcbride, Mclean, Nelson, FOR.
terrified, Talcott, Turner, Vail, Young.
Those voting nay were: Messrs. Ar.
len. Bronzer, Bronson, Clark, Davidson
Duncan, Ilken, Eningson, Englund
Ganssle, Garden. Gibbons. Gilbert. Gron.
void, Hclgcland, Hookway, Hoverson
Hyland, McDowewll, Midget. Overson
Plain. Putnam, Steel, Thoreson, TRACE.
ton, Wartner and Williams.
At this point there was a little by
play between a couple of the mem
hers, in which one promised the other
that if it was fight he "a looking for
he could get it. The remark was &C.
casioned by the statement from one
Of the members to the effect that he
did not believe the effort to defer
the action on the bill was sincere,
but merely an effort to kill the bill,
Senator Davis made the statement
that the passage of the bill in it's pres
ent shape would mean the repeal of
the law preventing the sale Of tobacco
and cigars to minors and Senator
Talcott followed him by saying that
since the argument had been started
there had arisen serious doubts in
his mind about the bill being able to
accomplish what il was intended tC
do. ., 's'1&sxiN411
He made the statement that he was
going to vote for the anti-cigarette
bill, but wanted it put in the proper
shape first. Hanley stated that the
question OF repeal of the old law was
a serious one and that it should be
given the consideration Of the mem
bers. He called attention to his be.
lief that no parliamentary practice
had been fractured in the proceedings
up to that time. Senator Elken NOV
! ed that the repeal section be stricken
out and this motion carried. This
! motion was made with the idea OIL
getting around the repeal Of the old
law. ...."'
At 5:31 Senator Talcott moved an
adjournment but when p division was
, called for it was found there were
only % ayes, so the motion vas lost
After the motion to adjourn had beer
lost Mr.. Talcott moved that the chair
appoint a committee of five members
to confer on the bill and make a re
port at 3 o'clock Monday afternoon
as to just what the bill will do il
passed and whether it repeats the old
law. Hookway was against deferring
action and Davis said that it was the
first time in his experience as a mem
Der that there had been objection TO
getting legal advice on the provisions
of a bill. AT $40 another motion to
adjourn was lost by a rising vote,
Here a roll call was demanded on the
motion of leaving it to a committee
of five until Nor day and a roll call
as follows showed equal division
again:
Those voting aye were Messrs. AL
brecht, Bond, Bonner, Carter, Cashei
Davis, Ganssle, Hanley, Heckle, Ho-
verson, Hughes, Jacobson, Kretschmar
L.eutz, Linde, Loftsgaard, Mcbride, Nc
Lean, Nelson, diversion, Porterfeld, Tai
colt, Turner, Vail, Young.
Those voting nay were: Messrs. Al
len, Barnes, Bronson. Clark, Davidson
Duncan, Elken, EIlingson, Englund, Gar
den, Gibbons, Gilbert, GronvOld, Hedge
land, Hool,way, Hyland, Mcdowell, Mud
gett, Plain, Putnam, Steel, Thoreson,
Trageton, Wartncr, Williams.
>