The evening world., 1913-06-27
CHARGES AGAINST
LAWYER STEUER
AIRED IN COURT
Justice Golf Orders Case Sub.
mitted to Appellate Division
for Action.
A JUDGMENT VACATED.
Actress Had Accused Him of
Debating Her Perjured Tes-
timony In s22, 500 Suit.
A JUDGMENT VACATED.

The charge that Max d. steusr. WHO
has been counsel In many noted Grim.
insi and civil cases In the last few years
and 70 rsputed 70 have amasssd . for
tune thereby Of over . million dollars.
wss tuiity Of causing perjury was be-
fore Justice Coz indirectly IN the su-
prsms Court to-day and was sent TO the
Appellate Division Of the Supreme Court.
Mr.. Stsusr asked for an Appellate Divi.
sion investigation. william Travers Js.
rome. who stirred up the charges,
asresd. The Judgment for S22.soo which
Faith 81. CLAIR. Mr.. stsucr's soubrstte
client. obtained against Kiaw q Er.
LANCER on the violence which she has
ainee contested was untrue was got
aside.
Mr.. steuer waived his right to collect
q fec out Of the annufied judgment and
~ the sams time declared that he
thought Il was the general belief that
Mas 81. CLAIR had recently received a
sum far In excess Of the DAMAGES
award to her after . Jury decided that
Abraham Erianger. In consideration of
her affection for him. had contracted to
So that she got employment for life
1t the rate Of S7b q week.
william Travsrs Jerome. counss, for
Kiaw d Erlanger. made the nation
that the judgment b set aside mi.
motion was based on q sworn con.
UsuiSuua 49,, NN0a~ n
neuy to which che swors at both ne
nsst and second trials Of che suit vac
false ana was arranged and dictated 10
her b. otsusr.
ofin q. Clair has already mad. n.
same statements before the orand Jnrv
ana Q committee Of he Bar As.ociat ,or
The testimony before the Grand Jurv
gAveS her tmmunity from anv cr,n,,o.,
oAsree because a hsr conf.ss.A c,,,,.
ia-svsasins falsely. The Bar A,soosa.
t3oo n oonslasrins charuse. Iookinr "A
he dasharmsnt a ate..sc
JuUttos Coz took I'M the onsa afts, Tia
oaii a he calendar and haarins thi,<sen
Other uotioaa
s~.,-.. 1890. >-
n C.A~e W S0"0VCV
Ms OWN d gNoe.
Mr.. 0teusr sppsarsd In person IN Do.
Tense OF his reputation. When Mr.,
Jerome Started his argument Mr.. stsusr.
slender. nervous and with his arms
claspsd acrose his breast nodded nsr.
vously At papers on the table In front
Of him. His former client, Miss &.
Clair. vas not In court.
Mr.. Jerome recalled that Mia 81.
Clair. Ia apoassat Good faith, had mad
. statement mat NJ. Enangsr haA
promised for the hrm 70 pay her SW q
week. The Jury believed her ana rave
her . verdict The complainant csms
70 my Once" he saad. TN Nay ana
tslksd 70 ne about the cass an two A..
fsrsat eooassons and made afndAvits Of
unplsasant ohasUss Against her counsel"
NJ. Jerome remarked that Mn Il,
Clair. q course. was . psr3ursr ana un.
cosruboratod. This aAmisnion. hs aaid.
was due 70 n. steuer.
Mr.. Jerome reed from Mr.. 6tsusrs an.
sv~rine paper. that. a. Ma. q, c,.,-..
counsel. he had no objection to tie ~.
vo.ins o. tne Judgment and gladly
We. :. -. .. 49,. =. MIA. nave N any
~. ~. 's"' ~ sec.
y'.I 'vs 49, ~ s'e NOT appear De-
~. '"S. 70 oas.ac'en.e any
cVnou'. 'no.oe'eo IN tne s"oavits by .
."" VI .ne DAT ne simply
."H t"s' w. .s~s"sos sss'hss h's
Sr ss" . 10 u
o..ue' s"so - no ross 90
~. v u.pute tns ,usuos
Nv 90. Hs Q. ."is yuosment No
eos ns'e WIN any idea OK
ovr S. ."s osass s.anst the ,uds.
"ent w 20 m.e.sss OF Aiss o. CAR.
1877 ~ ,as. p.o.eSuon 20 my own
ID ~ $50 !" 'ne ssessd outS
W w oos'' '" s'vs 10 An o"'osr OF the
me msnosss OF The press will bear me
guy mat my nrse knowledge OF this
=. e'. came 70 me wusn memoers OF
Rvpa