The Washburn leader., 1913-06-27

m0AACN uAA0OVCu, 0AA AAS SVN1i
tenance did not change. a
The defense then swore in q
steam filter by the name Of
Howard Miller from the firm Of
Grambs and Peet Of Bismarck,
who said he had worked on the
heating plant of Anderson g house
during the month Of January and
the radiator box in the basement
under the den had been open all
winter and that hole had been
cut out in it with timers nip
pers and sides Of galvenized iron
bent back. It is thought that the
box was introduced as it might
have been the place where the
empty cartridge had been thrown
It is also said that Attorney Law
renee will refer to this in rebuff
tai and he may show who found
the empty shell. Miller said he
had closed the other three radia-
tors boxes during the winter
with the exception Of the one
under the den. Miller said he
had looked at these boxes on the
Monday Funk was shot and all
Of them were found in exactly
the same condition as when he
examined them in the winter.
Ed Ritnour, a farmer living
ten miles out of Washburn, said
he knew Anderson and hunk for
a number Of years and had seen
them frequently at the bank. He
said he had been in the bank on
the Saturday before hunk was
KILLED, but Attorney Lawrence 8
objection as to whether Ritnour
lhad asked where Funk was, was
ISsust4ined by the court as being
immaterial. Ritnour said that
later in the day he saw both
Funk and Anderson in the bank
together, and his reply as TO
whether there was anything out
of the ordinary in the manner of
Of either which was objected to
| by Attorney Lawrence which was
also sustained by the court as be-
4 ing immaterial. He did say,
however, that there was nothing
unusual in the manner Of Funk.
Charles Findley, another farme
4 who lives IA miles from Wash.
burn, and who has been here wal
!. ing for the jury duty, was on the
stand Mond, " afternoon and said
he had known both Funk and An
dersol and had\often noticed the
demeanor Of both men. He had
been in the bank about noon OF
the Monday when bunk was shot
and at that time Anderson was
one. He was in again in the
aftern on at 4:sO. Attorney Law
rsnce objected to him stating
that there was nothing unusual il
y the manner Of either men but bic
was overruled by Judge Craw'
ford. Findley intimated on the
stand that he thought there had
} always been a friendly feeling
} among the two men. In cross ex
:. animation Attorney Lawrence
: succeeded in having Findley ad'
nit that he had been in court du
ing some Of the time while the
trial was in progress and while h
} might have thought there was 8
spirit Of friendliness shown amon'
3 the lawyers he was aware as to
enmity might ex st.
There was an occasional lool
Of surprise on the countenance Of
Attorney Bangs during the day
at the manner which Attorney
Lawrence seemed to disregard tn
testimony Of the witnesses put or
s|bys the deiense and the attitude
I, 81 MI. Lawrence ky repeatedly
/ dec inirg to cross exsmine, 'bu,
those few he did examine hil
questions were directed with vigo
! and seemed to. have vital effect
Many Of the witnesses who
!. preyiio olsly; testified for the STATE
were recalled during the day b
i the defense and their tsstimon..
seemed q to vary somewhat iron
they +old when, first on ths
!. stand. Y, .,s !. .3
Lud dw1ig Peterson, the pool hal
I proprietor, recalled by the de
tense ard who was about the fira
! to conduct Az! examination Of the
lden IN Anderson's g home, sale
!. that the green shade was up abou
l foot and q half when he ex
{. amined the wind low, this in face
II of the fact that numb bef Of othe1
IIWitnessss for the state Including
clerk oi court Hanson had statet
llthat the curtain hsd been draw
z y, n y ~ ~ IN - a o{s Sfhx