Norwich bulletin., 1913-11-01
SHORT CALENDAR
 OF SUPERIOR COURT Motions Heard and Cases Assigned for Trial Here and in New London.


 There was a short calendar session of the superior court here Friday morning and Judge Greene assigned these jury cases to be tried in Norwich with Judge Shumway on the bench:
 Nov. 4-Sheehan vs. Ferris and wife, Morgan vs. the city of New London, Tevlin vs. city of New London. New London.
 Nov. 11-Sheehan vs. Hollandersky, adm, appeal from probate.
 The court was informed by Lawyer Shields that the case of Jewett vs. Moran was about adjusted.
 Court Cases for New London.
 These matters were assigned to be tried to the court with Judge Greene on the bench in New London:
 Nov 4 Finnegan vs. Finnegan, Elionsky Vs. Elionsky. Long vs City of New York insurance company.
 Nov. 5-Whitcomb vs. the Connecti- cut company.
 Motions Disposed Of.
 The following motions were disposed
 The divorce matter of Bouchard vs. Bouchard was placed on the uncon- tested list.
 In Greenhalg vs. Greenhalg the an- swer was filed and the motion to place on the uncontested divorce list went off.
 Headings in two weeks were ordered in Crescent Chemical Manufacturing company vs. Stonington.
 In the divorce suit Of Johanna Para centi Vs. John Paracenti motion was granted that plaintiff amend complaint by more specific statement of grounds for divorce, and the time was made two weeks.
 Bonds of $75 in two weeks were or dered in Madison vs. Christensen.
 Headings in two weeks were direct ed in Lees vs. Dewey and the same in Joseph D. Harris vs. John Dono- van, also in Harris vs Benjamin.
 Motion was granted in Wilcox vs. Day that defendant give special bail with surety company for abiding final judgment. Bail of $2,00O was ordered in ten days.
 Special bail of $1,000 in a month was ordered in Gracey vs. Crouch.
 Leave to file substitute complaint was given in New Haven road vs. Arm strong and others.
 Amendment to the complaint in two weeks or judgment on demurrer was granted in Watt, admx., vs. Guile, admr.
 Headings in two weeks were ordered in Henry D. Winans and May Inc. vs. Elliott
 In the divorce case of William C.. Greenhalg vs. Grace l.. Greenhalg, an- sWer was filed and the case went off.
 Matters that went off were the fol- lowing: Leave to file amendment to complaint in Spicer. admr., Vs. New Haven road; judgment for failure to plead in Douglas, Inct., vs. Sweeney; Rudd vs. city of Norwich. default for failure to plead, two weeks by consent; and the same time In Washington Trust Co. vs. Norwich and Westerly Railway company on default for failure to an swer Edmond vs. Randall disclosure of defense; Mack vs. O'Neill, default for failure to plead; Intili vs Edwards off by consent for two weeks on de- fault for failure to plead.
 Matters postponed were: Morgan Vs Douglass ruling on demurrer to com plaint; Heath vs Heath and others, argument of demurrer; Vangieri vs Groton and Stonington Street Railway company, argument of demurrer; Lip pitt and others, bank commissioners, vs. Thames Loan and Trust company, postponed nisi; Windham County Savings bank vs. LHeureuX, admx., and others, order on report of commit tee to sell Tnortgaged premises, division of proceeds of sale and supplemental judgmentj the same in another case between the same plaintiff and de- fap6antS