The Oskaloosa herald., 1913-11-13


Darner. Suit at law. Plaintiff al.
leges in his petition that defendant
is indebted to him In the sum of
$273.75 on account of money had and
received and asks Judgment for that
sum with interest and costs. He
also asks that writ of attachment
issue against the lands, goods, ETC.,
of The defendant Attorney for the
plaintiff is Dan Davis.
Laura Ream VS.. Samuel Ream.
Suit to recover on an alleged promis-
sorry note which plaintiff claims was
made and executed on Nov. l, 1901.
Judgment is asked for $603.25 with
costs and attorney fee. Plaintiffs at.
torney is c. Yer Ploeg.
r. T. Penders VS.. Chicago, Burling-
ton and Quincy r. r. Co. Suit at
law to recover damages for the kill
ing of mule belonging to plaintiff,
which he claims was killed by de-
PENDANTS train on June Z, 1913, by
reason of the neglect of defendant
to properly fence rightof-way. Judg-
.ment is asked for $500 and costs. At
torneys for palintiff are Mccoy & Nc
Coy.
Orpha Deck VS.. William M. Deck.
Suit for divorce. Cause came up
for hearing Nov. 8 and court granted
certain property in lieu of alimony.
Reynolds & David appeared for the
plaintiff.
Frank Sloan and Leander J. Sloan
VS.. Frederick Sloan ct al. Suit in
equity asking for a partition of GER
tain lands. d. G. Waggoner is attor-
ney for plaintiff.
Christine A. Heating VS.. w. E.
Wood and Mrs. w. E. Wood. Alleged
in petition of plaintiff that defend
ants are indebted to her for rent due
on certain property leased to them.
She asks that landlords attachment
issue against the goods and property
of defendants for the enforcement of
alleged lien on them and that she be
granted judgment in sum of 800, in
terest and costs. Attorney for plain
tiff is w. H. Heating.
Glaze & Haynes Co., Inc, VS.. E. c..
Dryden and Adeline Dryden. Suit
on an account. Plaintiff asks judg-
ment with interest and costs. Attor-
ney for plaintiff is E. A. Schmidt.
q" Homer Phelps vs.. A. L. Lockard ct
al. Plaintiff asks Judgment for $3l
alleged to be due on an account and
further asks that a mechanics lien on
property of defendants be instituted
and enforced. e. A. Schmidt, attor-
ney for plaintiff.
Margaret Shultz VS.. J. H. Shultz
Divorce granted on Nov. 7, 1913, by
the court on default of defendant
Mccoy & Mccoy were attorneys for
plaintiff.
The criminal assignment for the
October term of Mahaska county
district court was cleared away and
the last case disposed of yesterday
by Judge Willcockson., Few GRIM
inal cases were tried this term, al
though more indictments were re-
turned by the grand jury than is
customary. The reason for this was
that the greater part of the defend
ants entered pleas of guilty and re-
ceived sentence without the formali-
ties of a trial. The civil docket will
again be taken up now by the court.
The following dispositions we're made
by Judge Willcockson yesterday in
the criminal division:
State VS.. Henry Kramme. A per-
manent injunction, prohibiting the
defendant from selling intoxicating
liquors contrary to law, was granted
as prayed.
State VS.. Frank Stout. Indicted
for seduction. Case continued on APP
plication of defendant.
State VS.. Park Lewis. Indictment
for maintaining nuisance. Dismiss
ed by county attorney for reasons on
file.
State VS.. Harry Stringfellow. For
mer plea of not guilty withdrawn and
a plea of guilty to maintaining a nui-
sance entered. Fine of 5000 and
costs imposed.
State VS.. lack Barnes. Indicted
for maintaining a nuisance. Found
guilty at trial by jury, and yesterday
set as the date for pronouncing judg-
ment. Fined $500 and costs.
State VS.. Albert Boyd Plea of not
guilty withdrawn and plea of guilty
entered to charge of maintaining a
nuisance Fled $500 and costs.
State VS.. Arie Boyd. Indicted for
maintaining nuisance. Plea OF not
guilty withdrawn and plea of guilty
entered. Fined $500 and costs.
State VS.. Art Sparks. Plea of gull
ty entered to charge of gambling and
former plea OF not guilty withdraw.
Fined $25 and costs
State VS.. Charles Hodgins. Plea
of not guilty withdrawn and plea of
guilty entered to charge of maintain.
ing nuisance. Fined $500 and costs.
State VS.. Neil Harper. Cause con-
tinued on account of sickness on APP
plication OF defendant. Indicted for
maintaining a nuisance.
State VS.. jolly Tarr. Case came
up for trial yesterday and occupied
the attention of the court throughout
most of the day. The jury retired at
2:30 yesterday afternoon and return
ed at Ais with a verdict of guilty.
Nov. IA at 200 o'clock p. m. set as
the date for pronouncing Judgment
Law.
The following cases In the law d.
vision were given attention yester-
day:
Dodd & Struthers VS.. Hensyel &
Sayles, ct. al. Court withdrew rul-
ing made on the 9Th day and the mo-