New-York tribune., 1913-10-02
SULZER To BARE
TAMMANY "P[OT''
Continued from first page.

he felt sure his testimony would be
! helpful to the Governor.
Frederick l. Colwell, jr., son Of the
missing broker who placed orders for
| the mysterious Account No. 500" was
| here tonight. He said he did not know
where his father was, but he thought II
! likely that ne might testify If the de-
! fence wanted him.
! The Sulzer defence, as il is generally
| understood, is TO be that the campaign
/ contributions were personal gifts and
/ so not 10 be accounted for under the
corrupt practices act; that Mrs. Sulzer
was the real Wall Street speculator,
not the Governor, and that Tammany
| Hall conspired 10 oust an independent
executive from the Office which he was
| using TO depose that organization from
power in the peoples interest. To cs-
| tablish this line Of defence Sarecky.
| Josephthal, Colwel,, the Governor hnn-
/ self and Mrs. Sulzer would have TO be
| called as witnesses.
| There is doubt expressed by lawyers
| whether the sO-called conspiracy line
Of evidence will be admitted by the
court. Lawyers for the board of i'm
peachment managers insist that II will
| be only over their dead bodies. and
contend that It is manifestly inmate
| rial and incompetent.
There is little talk nowhere there
was plenty Of it few days ago-that
the defence will try to put Charles f.
Murphy. of Tammany Hall, and other
! important Democratic politicians on
the stand to prove the conspiracy.
Motion to Dismiss Up To-day.
Governor Suffers lawyers worked
| far into the night after the Assembly
| board Of managers rested its case this
! afternoon, preparing for motion to DO
presented when the court convsnes
again at I. m. tomorrow asking that
all Of the eight articles of Impeachment
against the Governor be dismissed. as
not proved, except those relating to
campaign contributions.
| The adjournment was in the nature
of a compromise as the lawyers for the
defence wanted 70 have until Monday,
and TO decide the question the court
went into executive session, where two
votes were taken. According TO report
the first one stood 33 to II against ad-
iournment 10 Monday, and the second
~ TO I in favor of adjournment until
! tomorrow afternoon.
d. Cady Herrick, who requested the
adjournment until Monday, based the
req est on the statement that Louis
Marshall, Of counsel to the Governor
would be away tomorrow, in observ-
ance Of the Jewish holiday. and partly
on the proposition that the work OF the
case had so exhausted the lawyers for
the defence that he believed some OF
| them might break down unless the
strain was relieved by a short rest.
Sulzer May Testify First.
His remark as 10 the exhaustion OF
counsel is understood TO refer TO Har-
yey d. Hinman. who has been chosen
10 make the address opening Suffers
side Of the case. IL is likely that an
other adjournment will be taken be-
fore the first witness for the defence is
called.
! This witness. it is said, will be Gov
ernor Sulzer himself or Louis A. Sa-
recky. the Governors campaign secre-
tary. whom counsel for the impeach-
ment managers failed to put on the
stand. although he was under sub
,cara sarecky indorsed many of the
checks given TO Sulzer in his cam
naign which were not reported In his
sworn statement Of campaign contri-
buttons