Atlanta Georgian. [volume] (Atlanta, Ga.) 1912-1939, 1913-11-01

II is different in Eng
land" The formula has been re-
peated from coast to coast in the
course Of discussions aroused by
Mrs. Pankhurst's visit. What is
the at which is different in
England? Somebody ought to be
able to answer.
There are variants upon the
formula. Sometimes 1t runs.
Things are different in Eng
land" and then one wants to
know what things. But when
certain influential women in this
country escape from indefinite
ness and explain their sympathy
with Mrs. Pankhurst and the
militants in a phrase which is
now becoming common, THE
laws are different in England"
miliar with British law, bess for
enlightenment.
In what respect to British laws
press more hardly upon British
women than American laws upon
American women in the States
where women are still unenfrau-
chised?
An Important Matter.
This matter is important. Here
is Mrs. Pankhurst pledging her
self not to advocate militant
methods in this country, and
American women pouring money
into her hands for the purpose Of
financing militant methods in
England, alleging as the reason
why they themselves will not be-
come militant" in America while
they want women in England to
burn houses, wreck trains, throw
hatchets and explode dynamite
bombs-alleging IS the reason
why they 81 I'D keep themselves
safe while other wones endure
Imprisonment and torture-that
"the laws are different in Eng
land" 1t is fair question:
What laws?
With one reply the dis'in-
guished ladies' referred to will be
ready: The divorce laws are un-
equal and bad. They are. About
this there is no disnute. An
Enenshman can divorce his wife
for an offense for which she can
not divorce him. And IN my view
this admits Of no defense.
Yet the explanation Is easy.
The Engl'shman is consistent and
he has the coura get may be,
the brutal cosra ge-of his con-
victions. The law to which the
American man submits is better
than the mans own convictions.
1t is the secret belief Of nine out
OF ten men in America that there
is one law Of morality for men
and another for women. He con-
dones in himself and in his own
son that which he would neither
condone nor tolerate in his wife
or his daughter He has to sub
nit to equal divorce laws; but the
average man is easily confident
that what is for his wife crime
is for himself trivial affair.
The Englishman expresses in
his law his deep convictions OF the
generations. He holds that an
offense Is a worse offense when
committed by a wife than when
committed by husband. And so
ne makes his divorce law unequal.
No Second Instance.
Yet the sense Of humor is not
extinct in America. And 1t will
not be seriously held that this in
equality in the laws of divorce
constitutes that difference"
which justices incendiarism and
outrage and a recourse TO dyna-
mite bombs!
What other laws can be quoted?
Up to the present moment, in all
the utterances of all the Ameri-
can sympathizers with English
militants which have come under
my notice, not second instance
has been named. Is there, an
other?
The simple fact is that in Great
Britain the woman possesses po-
litical power far greater than that
possessed in any part Of America
other than the nine woman suf-
frage States and Illinois. This is
not generally known. but it is a
fact. And the women who profess
that they sympathize with Mrs.
Pankhurst and the militants be-
cause the laws are so different"
do not know what they are talk
ing about.
Franchise laws are not the same
In different parts of Great Britain,
any more than they are uniform
in all parts of this country So a
little care must be exercised in
stating them. But broadly they
come 10 this:
In Great Britain women vote In