Daily Kennebec journal. [microfilm reel] (Augusta, Me.) 1870-1975, 1913-04-08
MAINE LEGISLATURE.
Continued from Page Four.)


one OF them went behind the bar and
served glass of beer.
q. That had the appearance Of Il bar
room? a. Yes, sir
@. And not hop beer Joint? A. No,
sir.
q. So that of these four places you
only saw evidence of one of them being
bar room, is that correct? / mean a
liquor saloon" a. saw no sales in
those. They were fitted np-they had a
bar. both of those had bars.
q. | have got to start all over that
again, then. At 90 you said you saw no
liquor. none exhibited. and none sold Of
any k!nd=-Nou saw no liquor there ut
all? \. None that | thought intoxi-
eating. There might have been ginger
ale
g Haven't you said You didn't see
any? " don't remember about that.
@ You remember what you said Il
minute ago, don't YOU? A. Yes. sir.
q You Of course have right 10 cor
rect your testimony at any point, if You
make q mistake. Al -, "A you or dld
YOU not, see any liquor OF any hnd2
a. eouIdn I say IT made the state
ment that didn I see any. positive
statement, want IL reirart; couldnt
say
q. fou nav" a right IL. DO You recoi-
leet having seen any? \, don recof-
ieet, and al reeolleet Is that there was
no sale OF liquor OF any Kind
q cant You make that stronger than
that? There was no sale. ana you don't
reeolleet seeing any to sell. do YOU? y.
a. j Couldn't say as To ginger ate; they
most all ,oi them nave ginger aie-
e, You and iAwonst quarrel about
ginger a-e Even Ed Emery drinks that.
- don't. - sft5i 5s'.
q. Now at 81, Mr. SkiilingS, You nave
no recollection OF Seeing anything that
In any way resembled intoxicating liquor.
do YOU? \. No, sir.aasls
q. AT 50. you haven't any recollection
Of seeing anything in the way Of liquor
1T all excepting liquor poured out Of q
brown pitcher? Is that right A. Yes.
q And Il you didn't go into at all,
as far as you know? y. as Far Is
remember | didn't.
c. But ~ had tn" appearance of a bar
ROOM that is. there was liquor there.
apparently. y. Yes. sir.
q. So that in these four places. 50 far
as your observation went. You saw evil
denee af there being one liquor saloon
isn't that right? A. Why. in my opin-
ian there was evidence in all three Of
l .ese Places that we.t 10.
O. Any more evidence than you have
told the convention? \. No. sir.
g. Now. If Sheriff Moulton or any
other sheriff should search No. &C. FOR
instance, ana should carry off all the
liquor ttefs vas in it,. provided there
was any there. and he got the propri-
etor in 11H. that bar would still he there
wo'ifdn IL A YES. sir.
q And that vas all YOU saw in there
to Indicate that ii was a liquor saloon.
vas the bar, wasn't il. in -? y. YES.
SIR
q ! @oa,t 90 over the details II 1t.
Now on Free street did you go to No. 20
\. think have n y on my minutes
The, numbers on the place Is 2l.4#tr
q. ieu mink that il meaas The same?
\ think it docs. If ii doesn't p isn't
down there. that is all.
@ And there You found Indications of
a oar room? a. Yes, sir.
O.. Appeared to be a saloon. with all
the paraDhernalia2 \. Yes. sir, with all
Tie plraphernaha.
@. IS that true OF II? \ No. Sir.
@. What did YOU lind ut II? y. I
didn't visit Il at that time; l have been
there since.
@. v hat did you find there? y Sort
OF restaurant
q. Ne indications Of a bar room? ~
There was small counter. didn't no.
tice whether there was any display OF
liquors there or not; there were cigars.
q. When did you go there \. 1t was