The daily sentinel., 1913-06-28


Wheeler * Neiser, attorneys.
-f+a-Ihe First National Bank OF
ttulta, Colorado, vs. Arthur J. Lee
Joe W. EoHeile and r. a. Walker,
attorneys for plaintiff: MJNuHin a
SleTuperg and Elmer l.. Brock, at
tCFneys I0r defendant.
2Aii-Fioyd $. Carpenter VS..
Frank taller George Bullock. attor-
ney for plaintiff r. H. Walker. at
torney Tor defendant.
-4t'-N. A. GusCo aud J. II. Lee
vs.. Lottie 4. Ray, ct al. Frs q
welsh, attorneys for plaintiffs.
2i46-The Mesa County National
Bank VS.. Lambert Stcruuerg. ;. g..
McMuilin, attorney for plaintiff.
244i-AndTeW j. Hyde VS. William
W. Livingston. ct al Sam B. Berry.
attorney for plaintiff; Wheeler 4
Neiser and Henry Tupper, attorneys
for defendants.
2AiS-J. W. Eannlce VS.. J. W.
. Dowd. Fry q Welsh. attorneys tor
plaintiff: Wheeler d Weiscr. attor-
neys for defendant.
2450-J. $. Seely VS.. Fairbanks,
Morse 4 Company. Fry x Welsh.
attorneys for plaintiff. Wheeler a
Neiser, attorneys Tor defendant.
2i5l-Winifrgd j. Best vs. Edwin
5. Barnwcll Griffith q Watson. at
torneys for plaintiff.
2i52--J Marshall Miller VS.. The
Grand Junction Water Co.. ct al.
Griffith 4 Watson, attorneys for the
plaintiff
245i-A. p. Augustine VS.. Frank
7. Towner. administrator. ct al
Wheeler q Weiser, attorneys for the
plaintiff, Dan r. Carey, attorney for
defendants.
2i5S-James j. Hartnett VS.. The
tintah Railway Company Henry r.
Rhone, attorney for plaintiff; Vaie,
MacAllister 4 Vale, attorneys for
defendant.
2460-Hannah Hamilton VS.. The
Orchard Mesa Irrigation District. ct
al Ernest p. Costigan, Hugh Nc
Lean and McMullin 4 Sternberg, at
torneys for plaintiff; Logan a Miller,
attorneys for defendant.
2463-Kitty j. Oug, ct al VS.. Hor-
ace 7. De Long Fry q Welsh, attor-
neys for plaintiff; Logan & Miller.
and Wheeler & Weiser, attorneys for
defendants.
24G4-Kitty J. Ong. ct al VS.. The
Bonita Valley Land Company. Fry
Z Welsh, attorneys for plaintiffs;
Logan & Miller and Wheeler Il Weis-
er, attorneys for defendants.
2465-J. J. Lumsden VS.. Sarah ].
Barkuloo. McMullin 4 Steruberg
and Elmer l.. Brock, attorneys for
plaintiff; Wheeler & Weiser, uttor-
neys for defendant.
2467-Frank f. Knowles VS.
School District No. 23, Mesa County
Colorado. Henry r.. Rhone. attorney
for plaintiff; Wheeler & Weiser, at.
tOrneys for defendants.
l 24S0-Loren l.. Morrison VS.. Il. S
Sherman. L. H. Morrison. attorney
for plaintiff; Fry 4 Welsh, attorneys
Tor defendant.
24S3-C. H. Hodges, ct al VS. Ber
Dubois. McMullin & Sternberg, at
torneys for plaintiff; Fry 4 Welsh
attorneys for defendant
24SS-William II. Smith VS.. Ma
than ]. Mister. Stewart q King
attorneys for plaintiff.
2492-E. A. Spencer vs.. Olive +
Storm. Griffith & Watson and sil
mon l.. Smith, attorneys for plaintiff
2493-Harry w. Friend VS.. Denye
& Rio Grande Railroad co. Griffith
a Watson, attorneys for plaintiff
h. n. Clark and r. G.. Lucas, attOr
neys for defendant.
24g1-Smith Bailey Drug Co, VS.
Walter X. Graham, ct al. McMullil
& Sternberg, attorneys for plaintiff
2i95--The First National Bank o
Fruita, c. p. Hin, interyenOr, VS.
Frank A. Collins, ct al Logan 4
Miller, attorneys for plaintiff; Henr.
r. Rhone, attorney for intervcnur.
249G-The Board of County Com
missioners of the County Of Mesa VS.
Walter S. Sullivan. l.. l.. Morrison
attorney for plaintiff; Logan G Mil
Ter, Fry G Welsh and Samuel n
Wheeler. attorneys for defendant.
2499-I G. Roberts VS.. Lillian A
Wright, et al Griffith & Watson
and Simon l.. Smith, attorneys fcl
plaintiff.
George r. Drury, ct al vs.
Eta NJ Yoss. ct al. Stuart & Muir
ray and J. Il. Mccall, attorneys fol
plaintiff: d. d. Potter and Fry &
Welsh, attorneys for defendant.
250S-Herman Newman vs.. H. S
Miller. George Bullock, attorney fol
plaintiff.
II 251S-Jesse b. Boyer VS.. The
Grand Junction Elis Temple Associa.
tion, corporation. George Bullock
attorney for plaintiffs; Fry & Welsh
and McMullin & Sternberg, attorneys
/ for defendant.
/ 25l9-Oliver p. Howell vs.. Eli p
Shellenberger. ]. h. beaverton, Sill.
mon L. Smith and Griffith & Watson
attorneys for plaintiff; Logan & Mil
Ter, attorneys for defendant.
/ 2521--People Of the State Of Colo
RADIO upon the relation of Elmer Hiatt
VS.. Arthur Tannehill, ct al. Fry &
Welsh and d. d. Potter, attorneys for
/ plaintiff
2522-People of the State of Colo
RADIO. eX rel. Alice Pauline Broxholm
VS.. Rose Parks and Frank A. Parks.
Frank Prestige. attorney for plain
tiff; Fry & Welsh, attorneys for de-
PENDANTS.
2523-Leander V. Davis, ct al. VS..
The Town of Fruita. Nourse & Hal
derman and McMullin & Sternbers
attorneys for plaintiff Fry & Welsh
attorneys for defendant.
2524-Daniel w. Lynch VS.. Jona-
L. ri