Burlington weekly free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1866-1928, 1913-03-13
COUNTY COURT In SESSION
No Jury Cases to Be Taken Up
until Next Week.
Calling OF the Dockets shows 10 Cases
for Hearing by the Court md "a
for Trial by Jury--Four Di-
vorce Suits FILED.

March term Of Chittenden county court
opened Tuesday morning, Judge f. l.,
Waterman presiding Opening prayers
were read by the Rev. Samuel G.. Barnes
and Sheriff James II. Allen made the Off
clal opening proclamation. The morning
session of the court was devoted to the
calling OF the jury, court and general
dockets or the 46 cases on the jury
calendar, "a were set for trial by Jury.
OF the 30 court cases. but 16 are marked
for actual hearing. The petit jury will
not convene, however, until next Tues
day as they have been excused until that
time by Judge Waterman in response to
petition by members of the bar. Tho
grand jury assembled at two o'clock in
the afternoon and, after receiving in
structions, retired There is considerable
criminal business, 1t Is understood, to
come before the grand jury. The re-
mander of the week will be- given over
to the hearing of such court cases as
may be ready.
The entries on the jury list are as fol-
lows:
state vs., estate Of George Thorpe, ap-
peal from commissioners. Set to court.
r. Henry Powell VS.. Bailey Granite Co,
assumpsIt. No trial
Elias Lyman VS.. c. w. James, trover
rrial
c. b. Wethorby and V. A. Bullard VS.
II. b. Wiley, Apt, trover Court.
a. G. Humphrey, admir- VS.. Central
Vermont r. r. Co., negligence. No trial,
Probably settled.
Il roceorJ IT l.o,
of contract. Trial
A. +. Warren ct al VS. r. II. Murphy,
action on case. Trial.
The Frank Jones Brewing Co. VS. Frank
Robillard. assumpsit. SCI to court
Edna |. Bickford VS.. L. G. Norton, as
Isumpslt. no trial
Ernest G. Norton VS.. Guy Bickford as
sumpsit. No trial.
Amos Atwood, admir- VS.. The Mutual
Life Insurance Co. Of New York, assump-
sit. Trial.
Morris Brown vs.. Thomas Gadue, re-
plevin No trial.
Michael John VS.. Ameri can Wooden Co,
negligence Open.
depths Desraleau VS.. American Wooden
Co. negligence. Trial.
Max l.. Powell vs.. c. H. Spauldlng Apt,
assumpsit. No trial.
James Dawson VS.. John Bradley, action
on case. Trial.
Hugh NJ. Morse VS.. Guy Potter Benton,
action on case. Trial. Special assign
ment.
n. c. Florence, admir- of the estate of
| William c. Ryan vs.. American Wooden
CO.. negligence. Trial.
g. b. Arnold VS.. E. +. Nash, assumpsit
Trial.
NJ. l.. Sceley VS.. Central Vermont r. r.
co.. action on case Trial.
]. H. Collins ct al vs.. Tst. Thomas
Gushing, appeal from pro.ate Trial.
Lucia VI Williams, apt, vs. estate of
Agnes l. Porter, appeal from commits
sioners. Trial.
James Miller VS.. S. II. Miller and Trs.,
assumpsit. Trial. Doubtful
+. II. Higley, Apt. vs.. estate Of Caro-
line Sherman, appeal from probate.
Trial.
/ Rerton o. Westm,re. admir- VS.. James
l.. Karrick, action on case Trial Stands
on demurrer.
Mary NJ Dakn ct al VS.. estate Of
Homer Kimball, appeal from probate.
Trial
William Ropes Trask Tx. ana TT, VS..
James Karrlck ct al action on case,
Trial Stands on demurrer.
Walter j. Broggie vs.. Allen Battles.
Trial.
| Bernard II. Porter VS. $. VI. Miller,
/ Apt, assumpsit Trial
John e. Kehoe VS.. Nancy Mahoney ct
all tresplss. Trial
Shepard & Morse Lumber Co VS.. w. T.,
| "a
| II. G. Ricketson VS.. Daniel Lizotte ct
al breach of covenant Stands on de-
murrcr.
Charles II. Stewart vs.. +. j. Poland,
/ Apt. action on case. Trial.
/ Glasston & Rosenberg VS. Harold
Cohen, Apt, assumpsit, Trial. Motion for
continuance.
Mary A. Hosford, pdm'r of the estate
/ Of Carroll 4 Hosford, deceased, VS.. keil
Myers ct al negligence Trial doubtful.
James T.. eastman VS. Isaac Perelnan
ct al and Tr., assumpslt Trial
Sarah Alfred VS. Jacob Perelman, Apt,
trcspass. Trial
Fannie L. Cook vs.. Clayton NJ Bell ct
/ al assumpsit. Doubtful
! William L. Dean VS.. y. c. Delano
replevn. Doubtful.
| w. q. Flanders Us. r, r. KoW!ey
| trcspass. Trial.
Thomas F. Leary, Admir- VS.. City OF
Burlington, action on case. Trial doubt
| full.
Austa d. Sturdevant VS.. Albert E
Richardson, assumpsit. Trial.
James Il. eastman vs., Western Assur'
ance CO.. assumpsit. Trial.
T a. II. NhNally VS.. Elvie Fulton, Apt
assumpsit Trial.
George Pratt & Co., VS.. Louis Melston
trespass Trial doubtful.
j. j. Poquette vs.. Fayette B. Calklns
Apt, assumpsit, Trial.
In the general docket, entries were
made In re College street extension II
the city of Burlington vs.. Central Yer
mont Railway company, apt, of final
hearings this term.
Four divorce suits were entered yester-
day as follows: Edgar II. Peters VS.
Louise Peters; Roy o. Phelps VS.. Daisy
NJ. Phelps: Walter j. Broggie VS.. Luc!
a. Brogge; Bertha Nj. Phelps VS.
4 llaslH