Pine Bluff daily graphic., 1913-01-04
Court Issues Writ of Super sedeas and Some May
 Leave Prison.
WILL TAKE A FORTUN l.
Must Ask For Bond al Indianapolis %lO.GOO For Each
 Year.

ChicaGo Jan, 3.-The Un.ted States Circui. Cont of Appeals sit ting in Chicago, today deere that .hirtv-two of the shirty-thI2e dylia- mters convicted last week in ln- dianapois might walk out of the l.eavensworth pen tentiary uHon the pledging ot $1,o7o,0oo bail. This sum represents $10,o00 for each y ar of sentence, the periods ranging from one to seven years. TO obtain bail in his amount it will be neces- sary for those who give bond td schedule $214O,O00 in real estate.
 The release of the former labor union offic als was permitted up1n writ of superse3eas. Fey may remain free pending an appeal Oil 8 writ of error. Shoull any Of them forfeit his bond and leave the coun- try the court adni ted. there is no way to bring them back. The offehse of which they were found guilty, con- spracy and transportaticn of dyna- mite is not extl aditable.
 Such of the convic's as desire to present bail must do so before Judge Anderson at Indianapolis, in whose cour. they were found gu lty and sentenced No application for bona was made on behalf of Herbert 5. Hockin, one of the six year men. HIS name was in the original petition but was stricken out. Supposedly Hockln desires to serve hs time without any furt,'.er fighting. In his arguments District Attorney Charles W. Miller, of Indianapolis, asserted that a- least ten of the prisoners were content with matters as they stood and, had no de- sire to appeal.
 Judge Baker, sitting wi,h Judge Seaman, read the op nion. Judge K0h]saat, the other member of the court, was absent. The basis Of the action was that Judge Anderson had refused to grant mo ions following the conviction of the men.
 Answering points advanced by the defense, Dstlict Attorney Miller i made the following assertIon:
 Ut is most surpris ng that these ] gentlemen at this time saould take to in II Anderson. At the time the charge was read to he jury they congratulat- ed the judge with absolute fairness of the instruction. It is absurd to say that the conspirators can only he convicted of one .ndiv dual offense. At least ten of these defendants are content with their sentencs and don wish writs of this nature issued
 While the amount of bail was un- der discussion Judge Baker asked counsel for the defense: Can you find a bondsman w'ho can guarantee to keep Ryan in Ih s country?' There was no answer and the judge con tinued: ct is manifest that no money or sum would be communication or eX- piation of the prisoners sentence. Attorney Harding said Ryan had been held in $10,O0O bond during the frlal'
 But then he was presumably m- nocent,' replied the court. NOW he
 s presumably guilty
 Mr. Harding volunteered that he had long known Ryan and had con- fidence in him.
 "I never heard worse per]urer on the witness stand than Ryan, spoke m Prosecutor Miller.
 l. was agreed that the bonds i shcula, be approved by Judge Andef 1 son at Indianapolis for the conven- 2 fence Of District Attorney Miller. l "Bondsmen must qualify in double ] the amount of the kind," sa d Mille' ] to the court.
 ' Surety companies will be accept ed b,p. they will have to qualify II the same manner as property own ers.''