Atlanta Georgian. [volume] (Atlanta, Ga.) 1912-1939, 1913-06-19
GAMBLER CHARGE:
ABSURD, SAYS
KIRKLAND
Chancellor of Vanderbilt Uniyer-
sity Takes Issue With Bishop
Over Carnegie Gift,

NASHVILLE June 19.-Chanceilor
J. H. Kirkland, of Vanderbilt Uni
versity, in discussing the implication
OF Bishop W. A. Gambler, Of Atlanta,
that Andrew Carnegie sought "agnos-
tic control of Vanderbilt by the 81,
10000 gift to the university's medi-
cal department, declared that it was
100 absurd for any thinking man to
lend cradence to-" Continuing. he
said: 1T was our suggestion 10 Mr.
Carnegie that a governing board Of
seven competent and experienced men
be selected, and I can not conceive
where there could possibly be any
alienation Of the management or rights
Of the board Of trustees. to whom this
committee Of seven shall at all times
be responsible.
AS for Mr. Carnegie desiring con
troll Of the university, the idea is lu-
dicrous. He is a public benesactor.
not such a schemer as Bishop Can
der would lead one to believe. He
alone was responsible for this princely
gift to Vanderbilt. and the claim that
Mr. Rockefeller was in any way in
terested is absolutely false"
Minority Makes Protest.
A bitter protest against a compli-
ance with the terms of the Carnegie
gift was made through a minority re-
port offered by the members Of the
board Of trustees of the university, fol-
lowing the selection of a committee
Of seven to control the disbursement
of the ironmaster's donation. This
board Of control is composed of
Chancellor Kirkland, DR.. Henry S.
Pritchett Of New York, head of the
Carnegie Foundation; DR.. William H.
Howell, dean of the medical depart
ment Of Johns Hopkins University;
Whiteford r. Cole, John w. Thomas
and Joseph II. Washington, all prom
inent in Nashville financial circles. ana
DR.. Edwin o. Jordan, professor o.
bacteriology Of the Chicago Univer-
sity medical department.
1t is claimed that the trustees o.
Vanderbilt nave very unwisely com
piled with the primary terms of th.
Carnegie gift, in view Of the present
ltlgauon in the court, headed BY
Chancellor Kirkland, which seeks 10
Nrest the control of the university
from the Methodist Church. since it
is asserted, that the trustees can nos
hope to fulfill their agreement with
Mr.. Carnegie unless they are victori-
Gus in the suit.
Contention of Bishops.
It is asserted by Bishop Gambler
and Bishop Hoss that Mr. Carnegle's
prejudices against denomInational in
huences are well known and this con-
tentiOn is proved, in d measure, in a
letter from Mr.. Carnegie to Chan
cellor Kirkland, in regard to the do
nation, in which he characterizes IS
unfortunate the influence of any
sect in educational matters.
Accordingly, he proposed TO give to
the university 100000 in cash Cor
the erection Of new laboratories and
the remaining 100000 to remain in
the custody of the Carnegie Corpora
ton, interest to be paid to the medi
cal department, until such time a S the
question of UNCONVENTIONAL influence
shall have been settled by the court
of last resort. 1t was upon this basis
that the board of trustees accepted
the gift
The minority members Of the board
of trustees, headed by Bishops Hoss
and Gambler declare that the infer
ence is plain that Vanderbilt will NOT
receive the additional $500 600 unless
the kirkland faction secures control
of the university, but. on the other
hand, that the university will give
away its medical department to a new
governing board without limitations
or restrictions.