The Bridgeport evening farmer., 1913-09-25

opinion that it is the signature of 1 William Sulzer.''
 l He said he had communicated with
 Attorney Horan, representing the
 Farmers Loan and Trust Co.,, after
 his testimony of yesterday but had
 received no specific instructions as to l his testimony.
 l Goodwin then identified the sigma
 lures on the two checks he declined to | identify, yesterday, those of Abraham
 ElEus for $500 and the Lyman H. | Spaulding check for $1OO.
 The witness then identified the fol- lowing deposits as having been made 1 in his institution by William SuIzer | between September 12, 1912, and his | inauguration:
 | September 12. 1912, bills $s,5oo; Sep 1 tember 25, 1912, bills $4 ,OoO: October g. l 1912, bills 8, 400; October 1o 1912, bills 1$2, 500; December 8, 1912, bills $3, ,O00 1 Total $14, 400.
 i AbraIn E1kus was called to the wit
 ness stand. MT. EIkus is a regent of York, and said he knew William Sul- ger for about 20 years. He identified 1 a copy of a letter he had written MT. Sulzer on October In the letter. ! MT. Elkus, after congratu1ating the governor-elect upon his nomination. said:
 q know congratu1at ations are very pleasant and very nice but a cam
 paign to be successfully conducted, re- qutres something more than words and so am enclosing my check for $500 to aid in the expenses of your cam paign.'
 MT. Elkins identified the check en- closed in the letter. MT. Stanch1eld then produced the governors letter in reply. It was very brief. It thank ed Mir. Elkus, many, many times and said, tI appreciate every word you say and all you have done.' 'L suppose queried MT. Stanchfeld, cit did not escape your notice that in ment of the receipt of the cIleck2''
 Objection by MT. Marshall was sus- tained.
 Cross-examined by MT. Marshall, the witness was queried as to his in- tent in making the gift. MT. Staneh- field objected. This precipitated a wrangle in which Judges and Sena- tors Joined.
 T have graTe doubts. said Judge Hfscock,. 'sas to the admission of that
 evidence but I have no objection to admitting it if we reserve the right to decide the question at the end Of the trfal''
 Senator Brown objected that stone violation leads to another" and sug- gested that the vote be taken at once. MT. Marshall offered to withdraw his question but MT. Stanchfie1d objected and made 8 plea for immediate deci- sion.
 The presiding judge said he would look further into the law on the mat ter before rendering a final opinion.
 MT. E1kus was then excused with out having to answer the question.
 Webb Floyd, president of the Mutual Alliance Trust Company, was Ques- toned concerning the account of Louis A. Sarecky, Gov. Sulzers campaign secretary, with that company. The ac-
 iy7I August, 1912, with a deposit of $435, and that between October 1 and De- cenber 31, 1912, the total deposits amounted to s14, ,o66.85. The balance on December 31, he said was $489.19.
 The deposit slips used by Sarecky placed in evidence. MT. Floyd was not asked to identify them the gov ernor's counsel conceded that they could be made part of the record. -I
 One of the deposits on October 15, l was the schiff contribution of $2, 800, | the witness testified. After MT. Floyd had identified Sa- l recky's signature, Attorney Stanchfleld announced that counsel for the man | agers had tried unsuccessfu1ly 70 To- | cate Sarecky and he asked that Judge Herrick inform the managers counsel rocky but also of Frederick l.. Col well
 Judge Herrick said sarecky "has been in this city and has advertised | his whereabouts. We expect to have MT. Sarecky here witness. I do not know Of MT. Co1welFs where abouts, but we expect Nto have him as a witness
 twill you endeavor to have him here by tomorrow or Monday" asked MT. with my associates replied MT. Her rick