The Liberal democrat. [volume] (Liberal, Kan.) 1911-1924, 1913-09-26

OlhEk VERI
ne could see its shining eye, but oil
nndlng the water shallow 1t apparent
~ became discouraged and moved OF
to sea again, where later, accordin,
TO the minister's story, 1t was reported
as having frightened nearly to dealt
the crews of half dozen fishing YES
sells.
These accounts of the findings o.
reverend gentlemen were gathered to
gether by Anthony Oudemans, who
published voluminous book on sea
serpents. This book contains all re
ported appearances.
DR.. Oudemans, from whose volume
part OF this material has been gather
ed, not only goes into all the "veraci
GUS reports Of the sea serpent's ap
pearance, but into all the hoaxes that
nave been played in regard to it. He
has even described a hoax that was
perpetrated against the sea serpent
by learned writer who desired to
show that BE reptile was nonresident,
and in coRpection with this piece of
false work the present writer un-
earthed fraud that has lain dormant
for so years.
Nearly 100 years ago a certain Sam
uel l.. Mitchell wrote paper designed
to throw discredit on the sea serpent
stories that were current at that date.
The paper appeared, in the American
Journal of Arts and Sciences for 1929.
Almost century later DR.. Oudemans
rakes up Mr.. Michell's article and
says that Mr.. Mitchell lied. quoting
that gentleman's entire paper to
prove it.
But this quotation was responsible
for the discovery of even another
fraud than the one laid at the door of
Mr.. Mitchell. For in 1862 there ap-
peared in Leisure Hour an article en-
titled Sea Serpent Stories" by John
Hollingshead, who, after praislng Mr..
Mitchell for the first honest ex.
posture" Of the sea serpent, and quot
ing him for a paragraph, proceeds to
steal his article verbatim and use 1t as
his own, which was ascertained by
the present writer when comparing
the quotation of Mitchell's article with
the article by Mr. Hollingshead.
One of the most famous pro-sea SER
pent hoaxes, according to Dr. Dude
mans, is a fraud that was achieved by
the correspondent of French news
paper, who gives thrilling account
of sea serpent beheld by C. Renard
and seven others from the deck of the
Royal Mail steamship Don, on the eve
ming of the 10th of August, 1881.
M. Renard and the others were sit.
ting on deck, so 1t is alleged, enjoying
a perfect evening and the CLEAN of a
sea, when a horrible and
monster came to the sur
face at no great distance from the
ship, while at the same time an over
stencil attacked the nostrils
Of the travellers.
The monster, runs the report, meas
ured from 40 to 60 meters, in SO far as
lilo HhhClOub COllo IuGdSuTee
ment possible. From the dorsal ridge
to the middle of the belly the body ap-
peared to be covered by ranges of
scales, and the general roughness of
the surface and the moss-grown skin
appeared to indicate great and as
sured age. The head was pointed,
with teeth sharp and enormous" and
from the throat, attached to a kind
Of cushion" there projected a hard
tongue, pointed, provided with suck
ers and glittering like steel" This
horrible brute stayed on the surface of
he water In full view for at least ten
when 1t sank again beneath
he surface of the water The alleged
oeholders Of the terrible sight gave
solemn testimony Of their experience
o the editor by letter, In which 1t was
stated with most remarkable assur-
lnce that all these facts we're truths
" refined and intrinsic purity. A