The Salt Lake tribune. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1890-current, 1913-08-27

BUulsph'
Portion Of Twenty
Ia Disgrace to CITY,
Commission
y. rhbune. 49,. .,,,-
y =, .;.-peplohns the atu-
4. = scgrty owners .1n. for lne,.
4 5 special local Ass sssesa,sa, sarsat
~, ot Twsnty-hfth street
~ -, s.d washington avenues
= : ia. the street In its pres yes
!, , disgrace TO the CITY,
C Nye has issued a
..,,'rs forth that the board
:. t,or what 10 do In the
s.Dssls to the owners OF
~ made an effort a few
ssS ssesssssd with the repavine
7 ss'e sts cost Of the abuttins
J, as,,srs u's presented such q
'T ,bst ne commissioners
J. throw @ up their hands IN
~ D's 10 obtain jurisdiction
s ~ abeolutely out OF the
.sdiuf 70 commissioner Nye.
ioner Explains. i
..,,s-nIng The first improve
sirest, together With the
-,.5jnr 4 few years ago and
/; IA commissioners to bring
q Improvement, are shown
n Issued by Commissioner
X 50, 10 follows:
|, Of Intention to repaVe
a street. from Washington
van avenue and Wall
y Tgeuiy.fourth 10 Twen- !
,<ts, vas published by or
4 dly commissioners, but so
s1rbsr Of the property
Ia district affected pro-
1ss, said Improvement that
8 sas not obtained.
! ,ts second time that the
d TSenty-fiith street be-
ruYpston and Wall avenues
|asd no efort on part OF
rstrrnent TO improve said
hal assessment. The first
,ys IN 1893. the. street was
= a ordnance passed levy
,sssient OF sl2 per foot
|ltllbs property In payment
~ he ley was made some
..rpsrts owners discovered
d 4 question whether legal
y had been obtained or not.
r1ilsr was taken into the
.E hEever, until many Of
MS owners had paid the
9rsnt levied for the cost
3 4 determined effort was
'Fs5s5 by a few Of the prop
N 10 saddle the cost OF
h he street onto the tax
\ d. city, which was sue
i.mupllshed, the courts
/ ',li legal Jurisdiction had
:..a!ned lnasnuch as the
aare had been included
pa frontsge Of the dis
Il! this decision, the city
tgsd all money refunded
,ttn raid on account OF
E.nt. and the tax levied
q vas remitted, the city
lg.al cost ot the improve
asg stone block curb and
&oss walks. amounting
rui o! the general fund,
" Warrants at c discount,
sderal fund so far IN the
has never recovered TO
vas made by the city
r1lng The money paid on
nid assessment and the
alsd ssoss.sS.
!edTs altet the
Ased, II was resurfaced
al the expense OF the
lsT. at E cost OF about
iool. Thus II win be
EFsdlctlon mas never been
= ldying the street and
property has only been
~ Ml amount for repair
Z The property owners
'I. WI ihe present con-
], = = sgeel. then there ls no
<,ai - Argument. but I was
pr..sa ',,a.. HAT so many OF our
,Es rslns and broad-minde5
~ 1 e, even suggest. in the
VI toai this street sbo,,iJ
"a paid for the second
We general fund OF tho
ne ne Avenue, from Twenty.
y. horih TO the Ogden
n Ins IIn. paved at a cost Of
',,.,s,N Y. anesi foot and paid sor
RI - nent on properly worth RI
|L.c',v. ''gnl l foot, much of
H5irvs ,s Inc property own
''t.,..,,v.ii! "! south Washington
.rsIy ,,a |, nc e Twenty-eishtb
|'s sss ',s'ae5t Taae district. the
~ ;el local assessrosnt,, t, a
rs Az ~ peessn! condition |
lItsjtes.ss 10 the citv
B Ss suo s.rs.lp Protested ..t,; asainst n,ys
- sa,efuIly. uey vN,eIIS'igate Viii nI,
n . srosss, ~ sne board Of COM
] 8 Il d. h,sst without dsloY sSrk
3, ~ 'ame by local las, as.
|A.a,a, =, .. ]. G, NYE
'>snls. 'Iee's and Public
Z: ~. q conmissloncr w..
a<'HI 'HI@en; csnsa,;; with rerayG ;ays IN u,
e'=<iiss is,s e the re res,,l, llmpor.
saIatssS5i tsSi'asss ne. men ia Je'rsns psz,ios
q zen b. oe That this fs' Is ,.S ,Ss
s7sn.ar,. ample a Of the tiha'er-Ms r,,n
'I,t oi you scqid be desired n fSog. og.
o In boosts. CD from
EIs';;r'|'o.:.RIA EIs';;r'| I: J.
HSs'' HIsas and Children