Weekly journal-miner., 1913-03-05

public building in your home town?
 If your influence is great get half-mlion for other sections 1t peculiar you should overlook Pres cot the largest city of section covering oneha the area of the State.
 Were you in fact at all personally instrumental in get ting this money any part of it? If memory us right appeal made you by the Prescott Chamber of Commerce something year ago to your torial energies the end that the Mile High City be accord ed this consideration and if i've" are not mistaken again. you replied very promptly and coureousy in effect that the time not prOpOus and 1t seemed impossible do thing then Yet an through the Assocat ed Press but short time that Douglas had been given I$1OO0OO for public building Is this appropriation part of the hafmilon you secured and if so why did you not secure it for this town? Surely if Senator of the whole State would not continue discriminate in favor of the southern part the total exclusion of the section you call your home.
 And does the of $2OOOOO for bridges come under this elusive we category did you get by your ndvid ual eforts We groping in the dark and seek light the question: especially when know that all this bridge money goes Southern Arizona except bridge across the Colorado river which secured through the personal eff forts of J. Lorenzo Hubbell of Apache county.
 And what about this $40OOO0 for the survey of public lands? Is the whole be spent for the survey of lands of the character named lying in Arizona general appropriation be used in all States where there land of such character?
 
 if for residents of Arizona But you rather vague about this well the others If you personally secured competence for each of 1000 deserving esoders Of Arizona do chapeau to you earnest but the Congressional Record conspicuously silent that point
 Shown up how the robber tariff the poor and lets the rich escape We little bit hay the facts but had impression evidently false one that this alleged showngup business relation the tariff menced number of years ago and did originate with
 
 ona crusade along these lines before you brief less awyer And have not the Saturday Evening Post and other magazines seeking cheap notoety been spreading the propaganda against protection for To- these years? of recognize the fact that the votes elast general election favor protection exceeded the number Mr. Wilson and against the robber tariff Great minds have disagreed on this question and still disagree and even your party is badly split You entitled your opn the subject but you should remember that the Dem of Florida threatening secession from the Dem Ocratc party If the announced cut in the tariff citrus fruits put force by the Congress which is shortly vene after the inauguration of Mr. Wilson And then there are the sugar Democrats of Louisiana the iron Democrats of Missouri the lumber Democrats of Virginia and North Carolina and the lumber and fruit Democrats, who and all want the tariff maintained these products Shame on them you exposed the niquites of the robber tariff that they the representatives of the people, should still de sire to tax the poor and let the rich escape They evidently present when the grand expose took place hardened that your plpc failed to soften their sinful hearts But speaking about your attitude tariff we' will admit you consistent One of industries r Northern Arizona you well know the raising of sheep industry in the State that represents investment of about $50O0O00 You too remember that back in 1895 your party tnkered with the robber tariff and the sheep of the Territory broke. When number of your Democratic colleagues caorng for protection for the industries of their State few months ago. you stood rm rock against the robber tariff and voted to reduce the tariff wool It that occasion i've think that the Congressional Record reports you saying ALSO WEI HAVE 3OOOOO USERS OF WOOL AND THEY MEAN