Atlanta Georgian. [volume] (Atlanta, Ga.) 1912-1939, 1913-03-13
COUNTY ASPHALT
EXPENSIVE, CITY
B|DSD|SCLOSE
Battle for Paving Material Con-
tracts Shows Illogical Differ
enCe in Prices.

Illogical differences in the prices
charged the city and county for as
-rsrt we're brought to light today as a
-s.gr of the bitter fight between va
,fors companies for the 1913 asphalt
attracts of the city and county.
The fact that the sewer and streets
,,ornittee. in joint session, refused to
,-.anr the lowest asphalt bid and post
,onad action over the protest of Chief
NJ construction R. NJ. Clayton has
started many wild reports.
majority of the joint committees
...r,ed to favor the lake asphalt of the
psrber Asphalt Company, regardless of
.,. higher cost. They postponed action,
t, was stated, to get the benefit of the
advice of an asphalt expert which
county Commissioners w. T. VIM and
: r thurman have gone North to hire.
Greer Advocates Delay.
councilman J. ]. Greer was the prln-
.4rsr advocate of postponement, stat
ios, that he had been informed that
lake asphalt made a more durable pave
rrrt than the artificial asphalts, al
-roIgb it did not analyze as well.
The bid of the Barber Company,
branch of the lake asphalt trust, was
500 80 per ton, the highest submitted.
The lowest bid was that of the Texas
rompanv. S21.75. The Texas product
snsrvzed better, also. The bids of the
standard Oil and other companies were
between these.
The surprising fact made known to-
Sav though, is that the county paid
sqs 50 per ton for the Barber asphalt
used in paving part of Marietta street
from North avenue to the Howell Mill
road In addition the county is paying
Warren Bros. of Boston, SIS per ton
ROYALTY for their mixing recipe. This
makes the county's asphalt cost S53.40
per ton.
City Pays No Royalty.
captain Clayton said today that the
CITY paid no royalty for any mixing
recipe. The county's price per ton for
asphalt is, therefore, more than twice
as much as that paid by the city.
Constant efforts have been made
IN influence me to draw specifications
favoring lake asphalt for % years" de-
cared Captain Clayton. But I'll quit
my Job before I'll be guilty of such dis
elimination"
Chairman Shelby Smith, of the coun-
~ commission, is an earnest advocate
of lake asphalt It is said that the
whole public works committee of the
county commission favors it over other
asphaItc materials. The action of
the council committees in delaying ac-
lion was to wait on the advice of the
county officials. The fact of the ex-
pressed preference of the county Of
fgals and the great differences in the
cost Of materials; in fact. the differ
ences in the prices paid for the same
materials by the city and county have
intensified the bitterness of the fight
Of the various asphalt companies and
stimulated rumors.
Clayton Urges Action.
Captain Clayton told the committee
there was no reason to delay action at
ALL He said the bids had been submit
ted under standard specifications and
that the samples had been analyzed by
the Pratt laboratory, which he con-
sidered as capable an authority as any.
He denounced the theory that some
materials were better than others,
though they won't analyze as well.
Thomas H. Goodwin, the lawyer,
made a speech in favor of delaying the
acceptance of a bid for lake asphalt.
When Councilman Claude L. Ashley
asked him whom he represented, he said
he appeared only as a citizen.
The lowest bids on all other mate