The Oskaloosa herald. (Oskaloosa, Mahaska County, Iowa) 1885-1919, 1913-12-04

ed grounds for divorce are cruel anC
inhuman treatment and plaintiff asks
, that she be granted a divorce, be Civ
en- the custody of two minor children
land be granted permanent alimony IL
the sum of $2,525. She also asks ar
allowance from the defendant of ST.
per month for the support of each
minor child for period of five years
and for costs In the action. Burrel
& Dewitt are attorneys for the plain
: tiff
Dosha ID. Warbleton VS.. d. w. War
! bleton, Suit ASKING for, a, divorce or
THE grounds Of cruel and inhumar
treatment and non-support. Plaintiff
AYERS that she and defendant were
married August 80, 1894 She asks q
decree of divorce, custody of two mi
nor children, and that she be awarded
the sum of $25 per month from defen
dant for the support of herself and
children. Reynolds & David are at
torneys for plaintiff. ...a.-. ....
Goldie Rittermyer VS.. Ludewig Rit
termyer. Plaintiff asks for divorce
from the defendant on the grounds OF
desertion.. She alleges that she was
married to the defendant in Oska
deserted her in less than two weeks
from the time the nuptial knot was
tied. In addition to a decree of d.
vorce, she asks for the custody oil
minor child and $500 alimony. Rey
nolds & David are her attorneys.
Isaiah McMains VS.. A. r. Decker
Suit OF law asking that landlord
attachment issue against property OF
defendant to enforce a lien that the
Iplaintiff alleges he has on said prop
erty in the sum of SITS he claims Is
due him as rent on certain premises
leased to the defendant. Judgment
Is asked for SITS, interest, costs, and
attorneys lee. Reynolds & David
are attorneys for plaintiff.
Jack Heinzman, by S. E. Heinzman
his next friend, VS.. M. Rosenfield
Suit at law asking for $500 damages
alleged to have been sustained Sept.
2S, 1913, when the defendant ran down
with his automQbile, bicycle on
which said Jack Heinzman was rid
ing. THE ACCIDENT is alleged to have
happened on North Third Street, be-
tween Avenue and High Avenue,
and 1t is claimed that the defendant
drove up behind the plaintiff without
any warning whatever. The petition
of plaintiff consists of two counts,
one for S25 damages to the wheel,
and one for $475 damages sustained
by the boy. w. II. Heating is attor-
ney for the plaintiff.
/, A. H. Stigers, executor of last well
and testament of U. B. Stigers, de-
ceased, VS.. W. J. Stout and Mary
Stout. Suit at law on nine promis-
sorry notes alleged to have been ex-
ecuted by defendants. Judgment is
asked in the sum of $1,000, interest
and costs. L. 7. Shangle is plaintiff s
attorney.
Mary X Young VS.. Anchor Fire In
,surance Co. of Des Moines. Suit on
a policy of insurance but settlement
has been acknowledged by plaintiff
since suit was filed and cause dis
missed. Judgment was asked for
$3.50 and Reynolds & David were
plaintiffs attorneys. 80 "..'' .|'' .'ta
Abigail Williams VS. r. V. Mater
and Mary d. Mater. Suit at law to
recover on promissory notes alleged
to have been made and executed by
defendants. Judgment is asked for
$475 and costs o. C. G. Phillips is
attorney for plaintiff.
Annie F. Smith VS.. F. s. Barden.
Suit at law asking for judgment of
$22.23 alleged to be due under the
terms of a contract said to have been
made for advertising services and for
advertising matter furnished by plain
tiff to defendant. Plaintiff alleges
that she Is the sole owner and pro-
prietor of the American Publishing
and Engraving Co. Irving c. johnson
is attorney for plaintiff
Bradley and Metcalf Co. VS.. John
Cruickshank Suit at law asking for
judgment in sum of $323.14 alleged to
be due plaintiffs from defendant for
merchandise furnished w. r. Lacey
lis attorney for plaintiffs.
Farmers National Bank of Oska-
loosa vs. Frank +. Baker, A. Upde-
graft and E. r. Hatcher. Suit on a
guarantee of security alleged to have
been executed by defendants to plain
tiff to secure LOANS made to Iowa
Manufacturing Co. of which defend,
ants are said to be directors. Judg
ment is asked in sum Of $4,000, inter
est and costs. w r. Lacey and the
firm of Burrell & Dewitt are attorneys
for plaintiff.
John l.. Stigers and Martha NJ. Nit
shell VS. Leland c. Stigers ct al
Parties to the controversy are all al
legged to be heirs of Upton l.. Stig
ers. deceased, and plaintiffs ask that
the probate of the will of said Upton
B. Stigers be set aside. F. T. Nash
is their attorney.
Stella Douglass VS.. The Pullman
Co Suit asking for $2,999 damages
alleged to have been sustained by
plaintiff in the month of December
1910, by the neglect of defendants
employees in not properly providing
heat and covers for the berth which
plaintiff occupied in one of their cars
She alleges that she was enroute
from Little Rock, Arkansas, to Wag
ner, Oklahoma. at the time and thai
her health was materially injured by
the cold Mccoy & Mccoy are attor
neys for the plaintiff.
Lamson Bros Co VS., W. G. Ebey
Suit for money alleged to be due
plaintiffs from defendant In the sun
of $500. Dan Davis is attorney fol
plaintiffs.
c. P. Ensley VS.. Jas. J. Burrier
Suit for a promissory note alleged e
have been made and executed Feb
26, 1909, to plaintiff by the defendant
Judgment is asked for s364.05; inter
:, est and costs. Burrell & Dewitt are
|; attorneys for plaintiff. r'"
TUSCALOOSA Home Telephone Co. VS.
10. n