New Ulm review., 1913-05-14
Passes Underwood Bill BY Vote
Of 281 to 139.
PARTY LINES CLOSELY Drawn
Five Democrats and Fourteen Progres.
''ve' Oppose Measure, but Few
Of the Minority Support It.

Washington, May 9.-The Under
wood tariff bill, proclaimed by the
Democratic party as the answer to it's
platform pledge to reduce the tariff
downward, was passed by the house.
The vote was 2s1 to 139 five Demo
Gratis voting against the bill and two
Republicans for it. Four Progressives
supported the measure and fourteen
Progressive Joined with the majority.
When Speaker Clark announced the
vote exuberant Democrats hoisted a
stuffed Democratic donkey over the
heads Of their colleagues in the rear
OF the chamber, faint ripple OF ap-
plause followed and the gavel fell on
the first chapter in the history of
President Wilson's extra session OF
congress.
Republicans and Progressives, led
respectively by Representatives Mann
and Murdock, protested to the last
against the measure, the lowest tariff
bill ever written, and proclaiming, as
the Democratic avalanche bowled
them over; the virtues of tariff COM
mission plans.
Republicans who voted for the bill
were Cary and Stafford of Wisconsin,
Democrats who opposed it were Brous-
Sard, Dupre, LaZaro and Morgan OF
Louisiana, on account of the schedule
reducing sugar 25 per cent and send
ing it to the free list in three years.
and c. B. Smith of New York.
Progressives who voted for the bill |
We're Kelly and Rupley of Pennsylva-
mia, Nolan of California and Bryan of |
Washington, Kent of California, for
merly Republican, but now an indie
pendent Progressive. Progressive
Leader Murdock and thirteen of his
Progressive followers voted with the
minority. Representative Copley,
Progressive, did not vote, answering
present to his name.
( Sill Now Goes to Senate.
The tariff fight shifts from the
house. with it's overwhelming Demo
cratic majority, to the senate, where
the party's slim. majority of six al
ready has been reduced, as far as this
bill is concerned, to four. Unless
senators familiar with the progress
of such legislation are mistaken there
is now little prospect of final vote
on the bill before Aug. 1.
The bills passage through the SEN
ate will be fought every step by a
organization, apparently
entirely in accord on this subject.
Democrats On the senate finance
which will handle the
bill, express belief that it would go
in practically the same form
as it passed the house and that their
small majority will stand firm to the
last.
The subcommittees of the finance
committee which have been investi-
eating schedules Of the Underwood
changes in several schedules, but the
wool. sugar and other schedules
which brought out the hard fight in
the house are not to be touched ac-
cording to the present plan.
The income tax and administration
features are to stand. Democratic
leaders acknowledge that the two SEN
ators from Louisiana will not accept
the sugar schedule and that they
might be willing to combine with 9TH
ers to defeat the whole bill
A change of two or mere Demo {
cratic votes would bring about the
end of the Louisiana desire AL |
.hough there have been reports about !
he senate that the Democrats intend S
to allow one more senator to vote t
against sugar and another to vote
against wool leaders of the finance S
committee refused to confirm it.