Honolulu star-bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1912-2010, 1913-06-05

conferred with
lowing The May
not ha meeting was expected 70 pc called IN July or
subsequent meeting and that had already been the
the complaining teachers did until after the meeting
then
involved question reopening that already
is dissatisfied with their action Then again the available funds
were held there would be sufficient funds the Department
recty however then little later the Superintendent
that Il might be well to explain the situation by letter to each Of
ing a sncond r ao - H @ Aygost st9,ina hat he
approved the his understanding that
final approval be given meeting July August and
August 20 he asking the intended
TO call meeting beforeshool and why By that
time the course Of study had been approved by the and
in other the same again on Aast 20 snr
Hes,tna ha Nay Inc same h s t I,h s nd t,i ~.
the wish nearly all Commissioners the May
on August Depart
suggested meeting following
aer as the expected TO De town on
August Il a. fourth wrote September merely
that would not be the first week In September The December
things considered the should have called meeting in
well differ.
Players Rules
I Is much and s In Tnoe mater
the Commissioners were laying for the superintendent
Principal the School both but that he ION to- them
between Of the players II
its rules and the losers are position
motions and cast most of the votes the relating
Of study At the May meeting II they meeting in
May meeting taken the matter with the supen
TRe question whether the
position which existed between the Superintendent
Commissioners and which went far to prevent the Of the
would leave no illfeelings
Secondly Of the Supervising Principals in oco
1 G May o Sl b and chiefly involved
this CONTROVERSY was that OF new or revised course o.
revised especially for the rural schools Two
the leaders in this
on each side regard themselves as the progressdves"
One Or two minor matters viii be disposed 81 ns Inc m
absolutely course Of study at least for the rural schools the
Principals that they the Principals
ssab Of separate Of study the rural
PRINCIPALS their first meeting on motion @ eaas m @
study At the next meeting Of the
Supervising Principals hold annual
thereon and that the
questions be discussed and voted upon at these meetings may
their mention being made Of new course
their intentions rather than the
ibis point bears the question whether the
moners wRen the second meeting the Supervising Principals
course of study proposed by the leading surgnt Principal
Meetings
Normal and Training Schools % r and 50
for adherence Of opinion as this although
that highly appropriate that he should
be consider such matters be dis
at this question that
whether allowed participate in the meet
which question raised need not be con-
it incidentally in consd
which chief dispute
whether the Superintendent should have attended participated in
those meetings.
desired the views the
by the Superintendent
he should enough to have kept away at least
after of the
had told Here again overlook the
well important undispued facts The vote the
meeting the
should meeting the
with the Superintendent
leading Prn-
cipal "orsanzaon by elect
Principals This leading insurgen then the
president but his declining another Principal nomn
Superintendent for that office and he elected unanimous
meeting the
minutes of meeting to each Commissioner.
Pope's Appropriate.
meeting of the Commissioners
and other meetings of the Supervising Ppcpa referred
Supervising Principals The Superintendent not
all the Commissioners
meeting of the
Principals formed ogani