White Pine news weekly mining review. [volume] (East Ely, Nev.) 1910-1920, 1913-01-26

aa.ele
counties ae1 ~
ssIlaf - Hne 5
= fap .sas 81 s
IA eoe wew .
asn az ~ aaxasT H
waste a. m af
nasS 3 state bS 5 eoaa teN
fssst-ShesI fsN ana - IS b
dem 81 fa~n = man35ia PA IS
taaa axes may nasnt ea h@
Instances Il over er eh
pHaneru valuation Bas e s
auiaunt 81 rents enly anne &c tae
STARE ans 3 considerable nafs Ia las
sees bae9 n the eaaniie q Sanee
a The nuhle schee system hal
salaries q assesSors ef heS1d
1aeins unra ot 6ae orphans inSsa
N eonvisss a. the counties
The ros al the strstn executive
branches a the saafe government
excluding f1e legislative 5aa5a ~
educational departments aarla
ana nanaa Hnstftuaans-bH1 3nelaa
1uE 81 elective na ~al4poauHe1 state
officers haaras am commissions ana
Tia stare police. h rognd numbers s
Hhau- $3.50 600. This r-aIzasau1s
ealls al1-axlma1a1x al 4he sfa1s
tx -H5s q go5e 81 esA Thousand
dollars taxable uruneTr The Vas
hDe euuIU nrnls~a owner WAC RAYS
s. zExas II earh thousand dollars
y taxable n1nIer1 81 a. asese ~
eculVe Departments VeHs eiiminar
Ell wDUld SIN have 10 pas 81
Il I Wire Pine aUHa where n
nux pEEs 81 n voul6 s1iu ha7e
II nv S1KHn 1Axas Der thousand s.
-he EXECUTIVE Departments hBa-as
Ena commissions a va-s eliulmntaa
II LYON COUNTY The -aHaf would ~
II The NM n1 So II s5n. ae
II ne foregoing. nn comparison
mare WI lie 1ExH residing II
mun1eipEras where The 1az -uia s.
anaa11r 6auhis IL SIRE ant eolI-
IT r41A Il 3snn. znr example b
-e f-uu Euuh Haa rim u ne 1aza
EXPENSE H5aaahst II ~ a9aeutrf dA
rua1 AaH~as HnE COMMISSIONS
weu5E ~ n -hs -Hz51 ~ So -
$3.50 ca aash 1haaanna dollars q
rEzh1a ~
New. 81 IS BOZ Eaahar ul "a
1-raanrs sush uausursaHs E IS
uuse csn thE- wsn l-HEas vholH
s1s aunHa5an q zaaare o.
pa-mur aT1aluzH nfa hnazas
EnE commission q 11s Eae govern
manz IL EhHr ws possible wal4d
nH sfez GzF Startling measure 81
RELIEF II IA tEE1H-mHaE less
81 = lhs pruning va-s u1r pHIE
EnE EmouH7HE 70 Ia Etna51laI uf al
0Has 81 a commission O. WI 1n
the lass g F1BBpH2.bbe n ruuud
numaH-z taxable u u lns
s-Ete Lbe pruning e. aaoh $1,000
1ram 1hs easf &C 1hs Ea govern
mau1 Eou56 MAKE 3 difference q nm
uIs aHrz IA p-uIsuvner hRE an
Ear Il -aEa 1,e- 1baaEau6 dollars b.
sessma11- HaUsuBu Thuk n l1H
pruning Is $4,000. when * Is u7En-
slated IL difference 70 the nluiuus
Taxpayers bH saves - Gems un aadh
thousand collars g properly rafu-
z1an 100000 sIEznE would ms
mlfe a 5ol1rs areenas On ss11
THOUSAND collars q property raaH
zla1
+ Nsx. 1rnn the foregoing 81 rnsf
EaaHr Ihas The HxHEans II lhs
state WIG H-s r-azslBzIz1E au1
sasily. rns-s e Ii nuesuaa9 q he
hardez q 1ax8na1 Re M lEs1F -
Snd 1he rroalsn o rsisf -
rs many seen 10 tazE WhHu Sd
zlrra3. T. resolves 5saf uo rEuzh
cations Wild 51dln5s H1nazmsna
re presa1f 11=QusAsls assm -
taxsfioz faY wal1s Zuaa property
escapes 1axzt51l q Is u5erTEua5a
and An everlasting q Az
county goFe-zzszts - Ne1 IL TIA
OF he state. 70 eliminate vase
without reducing e@rie-u. LE1aF
il involves The pro.15aa zzssa1
By ne in q former message 70 re
legislature. As follows
That ne should address c
selves "a The Ways and nszns &
bringing more population and Ueas
ing more iexahle property IN his
state That this No-k o. state ~
building permits OF 10 pos;ponemea.
without inviting in the measurable
future a crisis in the state. between