Arizona republican., 1913-06-30

. opinions o. Saturday aft,r-
 tsa-. I..-- uty-y tuo. Judac D......u ea. anl Chief ~tice |...... ... sa, ut inc r.~,~ came
 E Tma and C;ra-
 ..us.,~ .u.0. ruu of them
 .n .a.ytIy- county. The
 -a-u. ...at opinions were
 u.. ~. :ao from Green
 .... reversed and ra- .... Tn. e.a.~ y.,r, IS forol-
 Tsom Yuma County
 H T. Suatn.ru Pacific. r.. .trar. N~ James Fender.
 ,rru-. .H Arlr .f "r-
 f.. -..-t.or ca.rt uI Numu e..U u.f.ta Hon J F. o'Cou-
 -I..a- special iudge
 .... #. trJ-, Frank Baxter. .. .r.< u if. ..-v rested in the
 .... D. H.n3o- in which
 u...t.d t> .ar lower court.
 ~uths,u P-vitic company
 -eufI< nr.,d his urarrrty-
 ,N..st5.r rt~ taken. ana
 .. oH-f"tILng th, t.ot.uu Southern Ia..t. company aIcs-
 ta. SiuIGiarIE enough
 formerly before tn,
 mat-.n WI Ponder but
 au account ut la.h ot . sIlegaj.ons in the caee
 t.- anr.Iee Fender Was
 r@-l un NaN I- I4I0. !
 faa horses. Hlun4 Third
 NHm# .uG at the railroad l
 t...so5 Dmulv.e-- were
 n4 switch. aud hy tharI H4 ...l- rs..u .t cars uaS sent across {. r.. ~..- -reat rate If Speed i t.t tnuat Earnine .r amy not- l
 
 ...eF aud IermaneutlN injured i .'- #-r. luIau aln l~ supposed l., b,. | .a aElE rler. taLtl ta give notice 1. Y. t.Ht F ut tae coming or the cans i t.- '. .e .ef tl. trial .-r dele4l- ! aH- ..retd company filed d general ! setting up further grounds l nanaraE nn it- iart which were -.t l-eei iL tac .JH~e of action ! #H..l when uE,Ir.I,5 We're assigned ! .= eIer ur tine defense The iudg- l .ert N. tl- .uuer court was affirmed ! Justice Franklin wrote the opinion I JH'1e Ross ,on-uried in toto. and ! .'- 'uo0iuaham concurrcJ in part i and .u the conclusion
 From Pima County
 NJ l-@-. Sylvester Could. SiIas Y 1 '.aH.a her husband. and ~lIas Gould l! n iatmr -on of tar tNo above .... Ht- I E. Soto and An- '.Hr. E9su"n. eN"outar~ of t.e --- ra-. n[ tr- A.t4-raelt Ochoa. de- aI tried before Judge J. IT. | '#t.fHeH then territorial district aH-a This was au action brought | .N t.. apT-Iee~. tp obtain possession i .''tfia D.fE property in Tucson | Ho ta. a5lreetian i- that the GouIds | were tenants of tHc property at the Inn" ai the death of AIt82racia Ocroa | aa a"..aad tor payment of rent and !
 
 lt Ia tho lower coart the iude- -|-ut issued for the u9Intiffs the ! e<. fer~. "nereuuon a new trial was { Hf=e.. oEerru.ed and 1n appeal taken | il' f-Teal is taken from the order I .I iI- court in the ease. and the | Hflut sustaining of a plea at bar Ih- count funds no error iii the record . #nt refl-e~ tn interfere with the Judgment Judge Cunningham wrote 1
 From Graham County
 \o- 1->N. The GiIa Valley Copper CsmpauE. appellant v-. ". C. ,5il- ! TIue. C. <. Case and J. F. Goldiag. an arue. from the judgment of the .pe'ior court If Graham county tried heiere Judge \. G. McAHiSter This .H+ m action by the appellant to i 4ut"t title [" nine certain mining claims located Iu the Lone Star Min iHe district of Gila county. it being alleged that the three appeIIoes above had forfeited the title by reason of failure tp perform the necessary aS- ee~-ucnt work. The ease was tried before julF and a verdict in favor ot ta" apInllres in this case resulting theT. upon the copper company ap- beaIed- In the trial of the case the defendants filed a demurrer to q ,roSs complaint of the copper com BanE. which was overruIcd by tnc court This is the lone assignment "f error The court holds that the ntarr Hssignuent5 arc too general and i'" indefinite t9 be considered The appeal ls said 10 be imperfect a}r otlcr reasons No reversible error Aas found and tine judgment was affirmed.
 From Greenlee County
 i.chard kaln, appellant Vs. the AlIz"nt Copper company, an appeal from the judgment of the superior court of GreenIee county. tried be- lore F. l.. Lane. judge Reversed @nd remanded. The case grew out 6f tu alleged damage suffered by Kain. HltI July g. 1912. and am amended complaint was filed on October II, i'i- The complaint concerned the operation and management of the hospitals of the company at NIorcnci Mcjcan and Clifton, and an aIega- f.uu that they were conducted for pf"nt and in order to avoid suits i"r damages against the doctors and surgeons employed therein. for maI- practice and negligence, they were 'arricd on under the name of the clifton Accident Benevolent Society kain alleged that he was assessed sIso per month out of his wages for th" support of the hospitals He all .eges that under a contract of em- rI"yment whereby the amounts were taken from his wages the copper company agreed to give him care when injured. Shortly after his leg was injured in an accidcnt.and he re- n3incd in the hospital from Septem- her -9, 1908 until Feb IS, 1910. when