Ottumwa tri-weekly courier. [volume] (Ottumwa, Iowa) 1903-1916, 1913-01-04


| 1SO1-Not on poll list.
| 1SO2-Not on poll list.
1s1S-Not on poll list.
| 1S65-Not on poll list.
| 1927-Not on poll list. ...n. ..,-E .s..-
/ 2O46-Non-resident Of Cttumwa at
| time statement was signed. ... p
2181-Non-resident of Ottumwa at
time statement was signed. ...
221S and carbohydrates.
22S7-Not on poll list.
! 232S-Non-resident of Ottumwa at
time statement was signed.
2549-Non-resident of Ottumwa at
! time statement was signed.
2656-Non-resident of Ottumwa at
time statement was signed. And be-
cause the signature is not attested
! under the laws Of Iowa and because
the person who makes affidavit ESQ.
called) is not reputable person in
this community. ,s
26S2-Not on poll list.
27O6-Non-resident of Ottumwa at
| the time statement was signed.
2711-Non-resident Of Ottumwa at
time statement was signed
2714-Non-resident of Ottumwa at
time statement, was signed.
2723-Non-resident of Ottumwa at
! at time statement was signed. And
because not attesteds under the laws
of Iowa; and because signature of he
who purports to be notary public
is not attested, or certified under the
federal statute.
2656-Is further challenged because
the signature of he who purports to
be notary public is not attested by
clerk of court or other ofcial, or GER
| tilted under the federal statute.
2731-Non-resident of Ottumwa at
time statement was signed.
2736-Not on poll list.
2761-Non-resident of Ottumwa at
time statement was signed. st
2776-Non-resident of Ottumwa at
time statement was signed
! 2866-Non-resident of Ottumwa at
time statement was signed.
2899-Non-resident of Ottumwa at
time statement was signed.
The foregoing grounds of challenge
are based upon Information and be-
lief of contestants, who are credibly
informed of such grounds, and believe
the same to be true, and so charge.
Foraeries.
y.
on sheet number 20 of the statement
of consent on the ground that the
name of the signer to the same, as
contestants are informed and believe
and thereupon charge the fact to be, Is
forgery.
And upon such information and be.
lief contestants charge that John Nc
CURE who made affidavit to said sigma
ture committed perjury in making
false AFFIDAVIT to same. and was guilty
of the crime of uttering forgery in
connection with same. and because
thereof is not a reputable person. That
said John Mcclure is the same person
who made affidavit to the signatures
upon the following indicated sheets Of
said statement. the name upon each Of
which is hereby challenged as not be-
ing attested by reputable person:
! (Here follows the numbers chal-
lenged, sixty-five challenges in alb.
B: Contestants challange the name
on sheet number 377 of the statement
Of consent on the ground that the name
of the purported signer to same, as
contestants are informed and believe
and thereupon charge the fact to be,
is forgery.
And upon such information and be.
lief contestants charge that J. H.
Genochio who made affidavit to said
signature committed perjury in max
ing false affidavit to same, and was
guilty Of the crime of uttering a for
gerry in connection with same, and be-
cause thereof is not a reputable per-
son. That said j. H. Genochio is the
same person who made affi davit to the
signatures upon the following indicated
sheets of said statement, the name
upon each of which is hereby challeng-
ed as not being attested by reputable
person: ... ..t... .-.' ...
(Here follows list of numbers, nine
ty-three challenges in ALL
CO.. Contestants challenge the name
on sheet number 1922 Of the statement
Of consent on the ground that the pur.
ported name of the signer. to same, as
contestants are informed and believe
and thereupon charge the fact to be,
is a forgery. s.. ..t ....
And upon such information and be-
lief contestants charge that Ernest
Davis who made affidavit to said sigma
ture committed perjury in falsely
swearing to the same. and was guilty
of the crime of uttering a/forgery in
connection with same, and because
thereof is not a reputable person. That
said Ernest Davis is the same person
who made AFFIDAVIT to the signatures
upon the following indicated sheets of
said statement, the name upon each OF
which is hereby challenged as not be-
ing attested by reputable person:
(Here follows the numbers of TWEEN
ty-three challenged petitioners.)
(D) Contestants challenge the name
on sheet number 918 of the Statement
of consent on the ground that the pur-
ported name .of the signer to same, as
contestants are informed and believe
and thereupon charge the fact to be,
is forgery. M
And upon such information and be-
lief contestants charge that Fred Hahn
who made afidavit to said signature
c. mmitted perjury in falsely swear
ing to the same, and was guilty Of the
crime of uttering forgery in con-
nection with same. and because thereof
is not a reputable person. That said