The commonwealth. (Greenwood, Miss.) 1896-1923, 1913-03-28

TmAIHIE
J o'''' -
-.
OfhcIRi Paper OF telh'! aN" NY
Long Distance Cumh Phone Nc. @3.
J Cpvpr.rU0on MISS MAR. D, 1918.
,
AN okDlNA'o|
Lryyirg a special assessment under
500 q4I2 af the code Of 1906. Il,
er,srto,. by Chaptrr 20. Scnhte Bill
No ~ Of Il Laws Of the State of Mis-
|, siss,nni 1912 ..yainst certain property
J IN howard stree from Market street t
the southern Ra Iwav and on I arroIitor
: Ave from Nam rect 10 Lamar street,
and the owners thereof payin ing the cost Of
J nayIng, curling aad gultrrlug that por.
|, lion II Howard street from Market
sfreef IN the Southern Railway and on
| C~arrnlltDn Avenue from Man street Ia
Lamar street. and provide for the dis
charge Of the assessments made under
an Ordinance or resolution fixing an
assessment to be levied against certain
~uropprty owners on Howard street
from Market street to the Southern
Railway and on CarroIIton Avenue
from Main street 10 Lamar street, and;
Whereas. by Ordinance or resolution
duly ordained. the paving Of Howard
street from Market street to the South
eru Railway and on tarroiitun Avenue
from Main street to Lamar street, was
heretofore declared necessary, and the
same was published, as required by
law, and;
Whereas, there was no protest
against said improvements by the resi-
dent property owners. or non
resident property owners on the part
Of SAID streets to be improved and,
Whereas. the said Improvement by
ordinance duly ordained, was ordered
to be made by the Board, and the
owners on the part Of sad streets to
be improved failed to make SAID I'M
proyement within thirty days after the
said ordinances or resolutions became
operative; and,
Whereas. after said thirty days for
making said improvements by the
owners had expired, upon the order Of
this Board the street commissioner
duly gave due notice to the owners Of
each piece of property to be assessed
of the necessity thereof, and said
owners still within the time allowed by
law to make said improvements did not
make the ame or any part thereof;
and,
Whereas, said street commissioner
then under the order Of this Board,
| caused said improvements to be made,
and duly kept an accurate account of
the costs thereof: and.
Whereas, said street commissioner
at the January meeting of this board
| duly reported the cost Of the said i'm.
prUvaments along the above mentioned
| streets to this board and:
Whereas, the mayor and board of
aldermen determined the cost to be as
sessed against the property owners by
taking the whole number of front feet
to be improved by the property owners
| and divided the total cost of the whole
Improvement that was to be paid for
bv the property owners thereby and
mu)ltinIied the 1u0tient bv the number
Of feet front contained in each abutting
lot or parcel of ground. and;
Whnraae tho sa;d an~nortionment or
ossnssmont was madap nnder Section
%5IS of the Code Of T9os AS amended
TInn' CSantnr 2SO Spnate mi No GO If
~ IaTs If Missieeinni Of 1910 md.
y Wbernas said assessment was div
-, VIE nnt md GIad with the clerk Of
tba mnn;cinaIitv subject 70 the insnec-
tinn ond obiac+ion If no nronartv
o oU u ""U ord r'
Whoroas a rot;co was nrhIishad for
.,," woeLs in Tbo To~mmnnwaaIth noti.
t EiDn tbn nronnrty ownarS that as
sSSss65ent had been made out and filed
9Th thn r I Of the immortality md
srb;oct n tho insnaction and nh;ecfion If
~ said Dronartg ownars md notifving
ea;d ]nnr owners to apnear at the
G%'H rmT n,aatinr Of tha mavor ond
49, >'S 100 -