The central record. (Lancaster, Ky.) 18??-current, 1913-10-10


Five hundred dollars! How many
portraits can you paint in year?"
"a dozen perhaps"
That's $4,000 for sitting here daub-
ing paint. Why, | don't pay any one
of my heads of departments in my
business half that. and they're all first
class business men"
To this the artist made no reply.
IF you'll paint my portrait that size
painting. frame and all, for $3.50. it's
a co.
Five hundred is my price"
Goodwin spent some time trying to
obtain reduction. Finally it occurred
to him that, after all. perhaps. he would
not need to pay anything till the pOr
trait was finished and the artist. hay
ing expended his time on it. would
then probably take less for it rather
than have it on his hands.
you'll want your money, suppose"
he said. ION delivery of the goods"
"Yes."
Every well: go ahead"
Beckwith arranged with his subject
for the sittings. and Goodwin departed.
While the man of business was plan
ming to beat the artist. the artist was
planning to beat the man of business.
But Goodwin was in this respect in his
element, while Reckwith was not.
Though during the sittings that follow
ed he racked his brain for some plan
by which he might get his revenge for
that past injustice which still ranked
within him. his inventive powers failed
him. One thing he resolved upon-he
would paint the best portrait of his
subject that lie was capable of paint
ing.
The features are expressive of the
character. and Guldwins features were
no exception to the rule. Beckwith
while painting drew his subject away
from his cOvetousneSs by chatting with
him ON other subjects and thus caught
his best expression. When the portrait
was finished the man il represented
seemed to live One would suppose he
was about TO speak. and speak pleas
antly. Goodwin told the artist to send
the portrait to his house. but Beckwith
preferred to keep it till he got his
money and frankly told Goodwin that
if he would send for it with a check
for $500 it would be delivered to the
messenger. Goodwin grumbled at this
and went away.
The next day Beckwith received
note from his client stating that the
portrait did not come mp to his expecta-
tons and he had concluded not to ac-
cept it. Beckwith made no reply to the
note and in time received another stat
ing that since Goodwin preferred to pay
for the time spent on the portrait he
would pay half the amount charged.
$3.50. To this also Beck with paid no
attention. but sent the picture to n
dealer for sale.
One day Goodwin was informed that
his portrait was hanging in an art
store; that 1t was being visited by con-
noisseurs and pronounced a remarkable
piece of work. 1t had not yet been
sold, for the artist had set very high
price on it. Goodwin at once went to
the store, saw his portrait and asked
the dealer the price for it. He was in
formed that it was $4,000. Goodwin
went at once to an attorney, whom he
directed to take steps to claim the por-
trait as his property. But when the
lawyer called for the correspondence
in the case and read copies of his eli
ent's letters to Becky with he said he had
no case.
Goodwin found himself in an unpleas-
ant position. His portrait-pronOunce
a work of art-was for sale. and per-
sons were asking why he did not buy
it. To do so would cost him $500
more than the price he would have
agent to Beckwith to try TO effect
compromise. The agent returned with
a statement from the artist that the
painting was making great reputa-
ton for him and he had decided not
to sell it. but keep it before the pub
that way and let the matter rest.
The picture was withdrawn from ex-
hibition. and when it appeared again
the covetous expression that had been
left out was in it. This being reported
to the original, he went to see it again
and was furious. Again he went to
his lawyer and directed him to prose-
cute the artist for ridiculing him be-
fore the world. The lawyer showed
him cartoons of prominent men in the
newspapers and informed him that it
would be much more difficult for him
to recover in his own case than for
these to do so. Besides. any jury would
decide against him. II he wished to
own the picture he must pay the price.
Goodwin sent again to Beckwith. ask
ing him to make a price on the por-
trait. Beckwith made price of So, 900.
Goodwin made no reply to the offer.
Again the picture was withdrawn. and
when it reappeared the covetous look
on the face had become misery. Gold
win tried again to buy it, but the
price had gone up to $4,000. Goodwin
feared that II he did not pay it the
expression would become worse and
the price would go higher.
He sent word to the artist to ask
whether II the $4,000 was paid. he
would restore the original expression to
the face. Beckwith agreed to do so
and intimated that if the money We're
paid him he would distribute it among
the poor. This closed the bargain. the
coyetous look on the face disappeared,
and the poor were richer by $4,000.
When Goodwin opened the case con-