The leader-enterprise. [volume] (Fitzgerald, Ga.) 1912-1915, 1913-08-19

The written record in the exactly what disposition
was made of it, Judge Whppe did not attend to his emu OF
the case as should have DONE the criticism should be upon MN
and certainly upon and those who PROFOUND the question
know this to be cannot be said that these questions were
nrononded in spirit of fairness otherwise would not by nd
reton be blamed action of Judge of the Superior Court
the City Attorney the City Attorneys law partner Let these
GOOD men themselves for they aoundanty aoe 10
So am also this second head whether not the
fine was ever paid by defendant This question was meant 10
an idea absolutely wholly false did not impose any
fine nnon the defendant forfeited his license terms of the
ordinance This ordinance this form of punishment and
inflicted and only 1t was certainly severe punishment as
forfeited license for which defendant had just paid $1,000
and deprived power continue Those VINO pro-
the question know they had wanted to know the TRUTH
that no fine was imposed and therefore fine ever paid AS long
as the Judges of the Superior have the under the aw
sanction petitions w of cetora and hold up judgments
the Mayor just long such will the Mayor De
less to close up any business under sucn as
existed referred am glad OF the privilege OIL 4
swerng for official record but the Official acts OF the
snor Court ought not to be thrust upon The impca
ton sympathy with defendant points to Judge Whppe IN
stead of to me- and Judge Whppes whole life bellies the mca
ton.
Third Under the third head the question asked whether
MT that grand jury indicted the defendant for voa
ing the State the evidence that was produced 1
fore me do not whether not this true 1t may be true
or may not told is true but 40 not mysef Know
This was ofense and whrt was not concerned am
asked also whether my City Attorney after such an IN
had been found appeared behalf Of the defendant in
the City Court upon the trial of the and that the
was thereupon acquitted do know whether this is or
NOT This information easily be obtained from the City Atto
new referred to- not concerned with It's truth " It's
falsity. Let answer for for my ohai cohduc@ ana
not for the private and professional conduct OF another IL may
true that such attorney the defendant because
| of r at nondI m
it's municipal feature concerned II the grand jury suDse
indicted the defendant for violation Of the State law.
this all LAWYERS and aymen know constituted different
oense different and had no connection or relation
whatever involving the violation OF the municipal oro
nances as concerned AS lawyer can
readily see how the Attorney referred could have appeared
in The case without any of the ethics of the profession
and would have perfectly for him to do So Inns
c Aorncv private professional character something
for which am not to be held responsible; stand on my
record and not word of another But desire 70 say a
his private and professional character are above ana
were would shrink from being held responsible Tor
his official and private conduct told that the defendant was
before jury the City Court upon the same evidence
upon which found him guilty and that the jury trying h
seven of the best prohbonist in Ben Hill
county To say the least of it, this indicates that was Wiling "
on the limit in an law and order and prevent the
violation of the prohibition ordinances Of the City OF Fitzgerald
Under the fourth head am asked am elected
Mavor will hold Mayors the City Hall as the law con-
muates or will hold in private ONCE as
The CITY Charter which operating provides that
the CITY Council such place and after the passage OF the
FIXING the City Hall place for holding the Mayors
ur invariably exception held the court in the City
Hall The inference in the latter portion OF the question
that have heretofore held the Mayors court my private ONCE IN
of the provision wholly without foundation and
meant to convey absolute false impression am elected mayer
s ~:,s.*.. Continuation Last Page