Bisbee daily review., 1912-03-28
COSTELLO CASE
 ID BE REVIVED
Suit Will Be Filed Against Heirs; Attorneys for Both Sides Visit
 Tombstone
BUSINESS OF COURT

TOMBSTONE March 27-The first steps were taken yesterday that will lead to the filing Of the suit Of the Cunningham heirs against the estate of the late Martin Costello. A claim Of the heirs amounting to about s5OO- 00O was filed with Mrs Costello the ad- ministratriX of the Costello estate by the lawyers for the Cunningham heirs The claim was rejected by her and the way is now open for the fl- ing of the suit The suit involves about half million dollars and is al legged to be due the heirs of the late Paddy Cunningham from the Cos tellO estate. The claim is based upon an alleged interest Of the heirs in cer- tain mining claims that were sold by Costello for over S900.000 and are lo- cated in the Warren district and are a part of the claims that were sold by Mir. Costello 10 the Calumet and Ari zona Mining company. Messrs Neale and Mol -ott. who will represent the Cunnineham heirs were here this morning. as well as Mrs. Cunningham. as was Mrs. Costello and Attorney l Joseph Scott. Of Los Angeles. who ! will repre- ant the Costello estate. The ! suit will no doubt be filed during the | next fortnight
 Will Oppose Appointment. | An order was made in the superior court this morning. setting April 4th | as the day for hearing the objections 1 for the appointment of Frank N. | Goodbody as the administrator to the | hnaaa asd A i petition was filed in the court a fas | days since by w Griffith Of Denver, asking for the appointment of MT. GoodEody. Attorney Pattee, of Tue ! son was here today and will repre- sent ! the claimants who are objecting to the ! appointment
 Judgments Given. In the superior court today, judge ment was rendered in favor of Cod man vs. Quinn fo rdebt.
 A similar order was fade in the case Of Calvert vs Calvert for divorce.
 The parties are residents of Doug las.
 In the case of Kline vs. Kline whic1 ! involves the question of title to pro perty in Douglas, a number Of iaS points were up before the court and the case went over until tomorrow. It is a family affair and promises 'H be exceedingly interesting be e'ore 's is finally determined.
 Bruce Stephenson was admitted to practice in the Superior court on Hry tion of S W. French.
 Many Divorce Actions
 During the past week, no less than ten actions for divorce have been hi- ed in the superior court, those listed being as follows
 1 John D. Boone vs. Clara C. Boone
 The plaintiff is a residen tof VI cox and the defendant of Bisbee.
 Walter s. McCurdy vs. Lucia X ! McCurdy. Both parties are residents of Wilcox.
 Maggie Keys vs. James II. Keys both residents of Douglas. James Bell vs. Nora Maude Beil
 both residents Of Bisbee.
 Mary Graham vs. John R. Graha'A
 both residents of Wilcox.
 Alberto S. Garcia vs. Lucia B. Gar
 cia, both of Douglas.
 c. F.. Van Wye vs. Margaritte Var
 Wye. both of Douglas.
 0. A. Ash vs Edith Ash. both Ci
 Douglas.
 Annie B. Grant vs. Christophei
 Grant The plaintiff is residenf 1i
 Willcox and the defendant of Lowell
 Josephine Epley. vs. John W. Ep ley, both of Douglas. . No Appointment 4e ! The board O. supervi % were IT session today at a special meeting
 and intended to take up the ques
 ton of the appointment of superin
 tendent of the county hospital, but ! the matter was put over until the res ular meeting Of the board on the str of April.