Norwich bulletin., 1912-09-28
TAX LIST ABATEMENT
 OF OVER s5,ooO.
Judgment Given in Suit of Nsvin Es-
 tate vs. Town of Waterford.

In a short calendar session for the September term of the civil superior court at New London Friday morning, Judge William s. Case on the bench, judgment according to stipulation was confirmed in the case of Russell H. Nevin, executor, and others vs. town of Waterford. The judgment secures for the estate of David Nevin, late Of Waterford a reduction in the estates tax list for 1911 from total of $34,5S0 to s25.145.
 In the grand list of the town of Wa teFford for 1911 the property of the estate was placed by the assessors at sSt.5S5, consisting of homestead at sb,000 9S acres of land at $l,560, and 150 building lots at s2l.O0Q. The judg- Tnent places the assessed value of the homestead at 5000, strikes out the item of building lots and increases the acreage from 9a to 22O acres at s14,32Q
 A bond of S100 was ordered in two weeks on the defendants motion in Joseph Andrea vs. N. T., N. H. & H. R. R. Co.,, and the same was directed by the court in Frances Wood vs. the Connecticut Co. and Annie Lafferty vs. Connecticut Go. and Katherine A. Hooper vs. Connecticut Go.
 Special bail of S1,000 in two weeks was ordered In the assault case of Henry Lewis vs. E. Lynn Pease, ana a more specific statement was ordered in two weeks in Cheseborough vs. Cheseborough,
 Karoli vs Karoli, motion of attach knent of defendant for contempt, and Vasbecca Elionsky vs. Iman Ellonsky. % award of alimony pendente lite, bth went off the list.
 In C. H. Trail ys. Mark Stiles the Mbrt deuied the motion to take from ENry list and place on court list for Wilure to comply with a certain seo- tion of the general statutes.
 Answer in two weeks was ordered In Thomas Howe vs. George c, Raymond and others, a motion for default for failure to plead. This Is in the cele- brated Knowl Reward case.
 Pleading in two weeks was ordered Co. vs. Clinton F. Smith, and the same was ordered In another case brought by the same plaintiff against C.. r. Smith and wife,
 In Philip 10. Hendrick vs. Charles D. White, an argument of demurrer. Reardsley vs. Beardsley, an order to enter on docket. and Bond and others vs. Littleneld and others a hearing on defendants claim and request for trial of facts before jury, all were postponed. r
 An answer in two weeks was ordered ih Isabel S. Harris vs. Ray D. s. Ben jannin, a motion for non-suit for fail ure to file exhibits,
 Admitted to the Bar. ,/
 Morris Lubchansky of New London was admitted to the bar before Judge Case at this sessior of court, the oath being administered by Clerk Parsons. NIT. Lubchansky was also made a commissioner of the superior court. He was studying at the University of June bar examinations in New Haven so that a special arrangement was made by which the examination pa- pers were sent to him at college and he passed them there, Ry the state law now lawyers are to be admitted where they take their examinations, but as MT. Lubchansky could not be at New Haven at the required time special arrangement was made to ad- init him now at New London. He is to practice in that city,
 Cases Were Assigned,
 The following assignments of cases were made by Judge Case:
 Wednesday. Oct 2,--Karoli vs Ka- roll; fnman Elionsky vs. Rebecca Eli onsky; Lafayette F. Main vs. Julia Main; Ellen R.. Conroy vs, Joseph IT Conroy.t-
 Tuesday. Oct. S-Supreme lodge. N. E. O. P. ys. Louise J. Joyce and oth- CTS.
 Wednesday. Oct. e--Mohican Co. vs city of New London.
 7 The court adjourned at 10,30 to come in Tuesday morning in New London for naturalization F