Tulsa daily world. [volume] (Tulsa, Indian Territory [Okla.]) 1905-1919, 1912-06-29

cast for Underwood, thus dividing the
/ delegation OF six with Governor Will
son.
\ further revision of the Tennessee
vote was made before the final vote
was counted Governor Wilson gain
! ing an addition half vote ly the re-
vision. a half vote In Tennessee was
recorded as mot voting and Secre-
tary Brtton announced il 10 the con-
yention as half man not voting
Tho result Of the second ballot Was:
Clark 44G i2.
Wilson 339 3-4.
Underwood, III Ia.
Harmon l4l.
Marshall, 81.
Baldwin IA.
SulZer ?.
Bryan ..
Not voting, one-half
Compared with thc result ~ the
first ballot this was "a gain of q y for
Clark. gain Of 3-i for Wilson. a
loss or E Ia for Underwood; "a loss OF
seven for liarmoni gain OF one lor
Bryan; a loss of eight for Baldwin.
The announcement Of the vote from
the secretarys desk was challenged
by Ohio and recount gave the cor
rect total.
Former Governor Francis, of Mis-
souri, had taken the place OF Chair
man James before the second ballot
results were announced
]. Warren Davis, of New Jersey
took the place of Secretary Britton as
the megaphone man on the third call
State after state was called without a
change from the second ballot, until
Maine was reached. Here the two
votes that had gone to Underwood on
the first and second ballots went 10
Wilson, dividing the state delegation,
Wilson IL; Clark /.
New Jerseys FLOATING votes which
had been given to William SulZer on
the second ballot, went back to I'm
derwood on the third roll call.
In the North Carolina vote, Wilson
gained IA Of vote on the third
ballot; Harmon gained two and Tn
derwood lost. IA.
The Ohio state vote when announc-
ed on the third ballot, was challenged
by several of the delegates, VINO
claimed the announcement of the vote
was incorrect. The Ohio delegates had
n lively debate. Representative Rlne-
hart made a poll of the delegation,
while a majority of the delegates re-
quested that only Mr.. Rineharts name
be called. Acting Chairman francls
made a poll of the entire delegation
James McConvlle. of Steubenville
voted for John w. Kern and ID. e.
Yost. of Woodsfield voted for Bryan.
The poll of the Ohio delegation re-
suited in a gain of two for Wilson,
loss Of one for Harmon and the loss
of the two votes that had been cast
for Clark on sthe second roll call
Wilson added two more votes to the
Wilson total on the third ballot, max
ing gain Of two in that delega-
ton on the first roll call. The Wilson
gain was the vote given to Bryan on
the second roll call.
Tennessee's vote showed a change
in the scattering of the states "a
delegates. Clark last 3 u while IN
derwood gained votes.
Ohio again cast the vote that made
1t impossible for any candidate to get
the necessary two thirds vote on the
third ballot
The results of the third ballot were
as follows: Clark 441; Wilson 345;
114h; Harmon 14Ok
Marshall 81; Baldwin IA; Bryan /;
Kern /.
The change in the strength of the
various candidates as compared with
the second ballot were as follows:
Clark lost 5 Y; Wilson gained Ia;
gained 3 IA; Harmon lost
half a vote.
There being no choice" said Act
ing Chairman Francis, the secretary
will again call the roll for the fourth
ballot.
Chairman James took the gavel
IL 3, oil nn1 eft n r tor
at 6:04 p. M, with the big crowd l,1y-
ing close attention.
The first change on the fourth bal
lot was in the Louisiana vote, where
Wilson gained one from Clark. The
delegation was divided evenly, ten for
each candidate.
Underwood gained two from Clark
in the Massachusetts, vote. Clark and
Marshall gained one vote and Har-
mon and Wilson each lost one on the
Michigan vote.
Wilson picked up three votes in Ne
braska on the fourth ballot clark
maintained his strength of twelve |
votes there. Harmon losing three OF
the four he had received on previous
ballots.
Wilson gained another vote this
time from New Hampshire. New
Yorks vote which has been center |
Of attention at each roll CALL cast It's
entire block of ninety votes for Har-
mon. to whose standard they had ad-
hered from the first.
North Carolina gave an additional
half vote to Clark. at the expense OF
Harmon.
ohio gave John w. Kern on the
fourth ballot the single remaining
Bryan vote, Mr.. Bryan dropping out
VI the list
Clark gained 6 u votes in Tennessee
on the fourth.
Underwood lost s u votes of these
and Harmon and Wilson each lost a
half vote.
A gain of one for Wilson, lost by
Clark, marked the Wisconsin vote.
The division was: Wilson 20; CLARK
six
A gain of one for Harmon, lost by
Clark, was recorded in Porto Rico's
cote.