The citizen-Republican. (Scotland, Bon Homme County, S.D.) 1???-19??, 1912-09-19
the TRUTH ABOUT
THOSE DELEGATES
n9ossvs|t Contests |nstIgated
/ to Deceive the Public.
kLl BUT IA WERE ABANDONED

That tho tribunals Which Decided
These Contests In Favor Of Mr.. Taft
Wore Right In Every lnstance-Ths
Remaining 164 Contests Wsrs Frivol-
Gus, and Their Prompt Abandonment
Reflects Upon tho Gonuinsness and
Validity of tho Remainder.
Washington. July 29.-Here are the
facts in relation to the contested seats
In the Republican national convention.
1t is a summary of a detailed state
m"nt going carefully into all OF the
cases. a statement so thorough that 1t
takes up $50 pages Of printed matter.
This statement is signed by Mr.. Victor
Rosewater, chairman of the former Re-
publican national committee; by Mr.. j.
II. Devine of Colorado, chairman of the
committee on credentials of the Repuh-
'tcan national convention, and by Mr..
Charles D. Hllles, chairman of the
present Republican national committee.
The total number Of delegates sum
n"ned to the convention under its call
WAS LOIS, With $40 necessary to a
choice. Mr.. Taft had IS votes on the
first and only ballot and was declared
the nominee. There were instituted
against 23S of the delegates regularly
elected for Taft contests on behalf of
Roosevelt. These contests were avow-
eddy instigated not for the purpose Of
really securing seats in the convention,
for the purpose of adducing evil
dence which would lead any respect
able court to entertain the contests. but
for the purpose Of d%eceiving the public
into the belief that Mr.. Roosevelt had
more votes than he really had, as the
conventions and primaries were in
progress for the selection of delegates
This is not only a necessary inference
from the character of the contests, hut
1t was boldly avowed by the chief edi-
tor OF the newspapers owned by Mr..
Munsey, who has been Mr.. Roosevelt's
chief financial and newspaper sup
porter. The 23S contests were reduced
by abandonment to seventy-four.
The very fact Of these 1874 frivolous
contests itself reflects upon the genu-
ineness and validity of the remainder.
The seventy-four delegates include six
at large from Arizona. four at large
from Kentucky, four at large from In.
diana, six at large from Michigan.
eight at large from Texas and eight ut
large from Washington. and also two
district delegates each from the lIinth
Alabama. the Fifth Arkansas. the
Thirteenth Indiana, the Seventh.
Eighth and Eleventh Kentucky, the
Third Oklahoma. the Second Tennes.
see and from each of nine districts, the
First, Second. Fourth, Fifth, Seventh,
Eighth, Ninth, Tenth and Fourteenth
OF Texas.
CONTESTED DELEGATES AT
LARGE.
Arizona.
In the Arizona convention there were
ninety-three votes. All the delegates
elk in number-were to be selected a.
large. The counties were entitled to se-
lect their delegates through their coun.
ty committee or by primary. In one
county. Maricopa, a majority of the
committee decided to select its dele
gates and a minority to have a pri-
mary. In other counties there were
some contests. and the sttae commit.
tee. following the usage of the national
committee. gave a hearing to all con.
testants in order to make up the tenn
porary roll. There war a clear major.
ity of the Taft delegates among the
nncontested delegates. The committee
made up the temporary roll and then
there was a bolt. sixty-four remaining
In the hall and twenty-five withdraw
ing therefrom. The case Of the Taft
majority was so clear that 1t is difficult
to understand why a contest was made.
Indiana.
In Indiana the four Taft delegates at
large were elected In a state conven.
ton to which Marion county, In which
Indianapolis is situate. was entitled to
12S votes. "A primary was held in In.
dtanapolis, at which Taft polled 5000
and Roosevelt 1.400 votes. This gave
Taft 100 delegates in the state conven.
ton from Marion county, and II they
were properly seated the control of the
convention by a large majority was
conceded to Taft. Attempt was made
to impeach the returns from Marion
county by charges Of fraud and repeat
ing. These charges were Of a general
character. without specification except
as to n ward out Of fifteen wards,
and then the ~impeaching witness ad.
mitted he could not claim fraud enough
to change the result in that ward. The
national committee, upon which there
were fifteen anti-Taft men. rejected
the Roosevelt contestants and gave the
Taft delegates their seats by a unani-
nous vote. Senator Borah and Mr.
Frank B. Kellogg. both Roosevelt men.
made speeches in explaining the votes
IN which they said that the case turned
wholly on the Marion county primary,
and as there was no evidence to i'm.
peach the result certified, the title OF
the Taft delegates was clear. This is
the convention whose proceedings
called forth such loud charges Of theft
and fraud from Mr.. Roosevelt