Mexico Missouri message. (Mexico, Audrain County, Mo.) 1899-1918, 1912-05-02
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.
State of Missouri
County of Audrain

State of Missouri
County of Audrain
In the Circuit Court,
June Term, A. ID. 1912
r. p. Price, ................ PlaihtiH
VS..
William G.. Jackson, ...... Defendant
THE STATE OF MISSOURI, To the
above named defendant, Greeting:
You. the above named defendant, is
hereby notified that the above named
plaintiff has this 23rd day Of April,
1912, in vacation, filed with the under
signed Clerk of the Circuit Court, Au-
drain County, Missouri, his petition
duly verified by affidavit, and states
that heretofore to-wit, on or about the
year 1S5-, the United States OF
America duly issued its letters patent
whereby it gave and granted unto one
James +. Hicks and his heirs the fol-
lowing described tracts of land in Au-
drain County, Missouri, to-w.t, the
Southeast quarter 90 of Section
l'hirty-four $50; the East-half of the
East-half 90 of the Southwest
quarter Q-4) of Section Thirty-four
G34); and the West-half Q-2) of the
Southwest quarter 90 of Section
Thirty-five (35); all in Township
Fifty-two (52) North, Range Twelve
Q2) West of the 9TH Principal Meridi-
an; that thereafter to-wit, in the year
1850 one Willis II. Daniel, died tes-
tate in Clark County, Kentucky leav-
ing surviving him as his sole and only
heirs at law and his devisees, his wild
OW Sarah Daniel and his children
Beyely Daniel, John II. Daniel, Theisa
II. Daniel, Lucy Dudley, Frances F.
Daniel, Thomas J. Daniel, and Sarah
w. Da uiel; that thereafter in the year
1856. the said Sarah Daniel instituted
a partition suit in the Circuit Court of
Clark County, Kentucky against the
said heirs and devisees of the said
Willis H. Daniel for the partition of
the property devised by the will OF
= the said Willis II. Daniel; that said
Circuit Court by its decree in said
PARTITION suit ordered, adjudged and
d. creed that the interest of said heirs
an d deyisees in said property be sold
anu, the proceeds derived from said
sale be invested in lands in the State
of M is souri,, or elsewhere.
Plain tiff further says that under
and by virtue of the decree and iudg-
ment as aforesaid, William G. Jack
son. defer ldant herein was by said
Court duly appointed receiver to col
let the mon ey derived from said sale
and belonging to said heirs and devil
sees and invest the same IN lands In
the State Of Mis- souri,; or elsewhere
and that the said William G. Jackson
was BY said decree and judgment
ordered TO take title to any and all
lands so purchased as aforesaid in the
names of the said heirs and devisees
that the said William G. Jackson will
the money derived as aforesaid, pur'
chased the land herein described, bu
contrary to the said order, judgment
and decree said Jackson obtained G
general warranty deed from the saiC
James e. Hicks conveying the LAND
herein described to said William G
jackson commissioner OF the estate
OF Willis II. Daniel, deceased.
Plaintiff further says that the sale
| William G.. Jackson never conveyed
| the legal title to said tracts OF land tC
any person but that the same still ap
pears of record to be in him; and thi
plaintiff has acquired title to tn,
Southwest quarter 40 of Section
4 Thirty-four (34D the eastman W.
,t0f the East-half Q-2) of the South
west quarter 40 of Section Thirty
four go; and the West-half Q-2) o
1.-The Southwest quarter 90 of Sec
ltion Thirty-five (35), all in Township
Fifty-two Cj2) North, Range Twelv
West of the 9Th Principal Meridian, II
said Audrain County, Missouri eXcep
the right-ot-way OF the Chicago
!, Alton Railroad and about Thirty-fou
, acres decided to the Chicago & Altol
Railroad for pond or reservoir AM
tank, depot grounds and stock pens.
Plaintiff further says that the de
PENDANT, William G. Jackson is a non
resident of the State of Missouri St
, that the ordinary process of law cal
not be served upon him as provided b.
. Chapter 81, Article 4, Revised Statute