Albuquerque evening herald. [volume] (Albuquerque, New Mexico) 1911-1914, 1912-08-17

mcnt aud fhlth has bcou nay greatest
help iu this tr,tl. The indictment aud
prosecution could not have happened
except under the tense excitement
and strain ui the dramatic close uf
the Nc cNamara case.
- shalt spend the rest uf my liic
a. I have that which Is past, In doing
the best I can Co serve the cause of
| the poor"
District Attorney Frcdcricks was
not prvsvut when the verdict was am
uounvrd tie was ,islbly pcrturbcd
when Informed OF b.
"i have nothing to say hr said.
I'VE gave the jury evidence which
In our Judgment was complete and
convincing / think the Jury has TAX
en- into count what has been said 10y
the defendants counsel more than
they have the evidence. However.
Wr de- not quarrel with Ncrdicts II
b. our business Go present evidence,
theirs To- consider n. imagine We
VIII try thr Balm casc do not know
OF any reason why W. should not, ~
| is nr stronger case than this"
! Associate Counsel ~ u. Appel Of
4 IA, defense. declared that 10 was the
| nature 90; tho evidence against bar
row that brought abou, the verdict
at acquittul
"t have always frlt" ne said that
NO American jury would countcnancc
% scheme Co allow so many criminals
o. gu fr'c in order to convict "a dee
fcuduut."
u o. generally believed that Oar
row viii not br tried ON the second
indictment. charging him with the
bribery ot Robert y. Balm, the first
Juror sworn to try James B McNa-
mara The ease VIII be- called fuf
setting Monday before Judge Hutton
I'VE De- not know what viii hap.
pen after that" said Assistant IBIS.
trict Attorney Ford We are noi
making any announcements as 4,
llurthcr action by the state"
Me barrow said that hr had in'
tended to return io Chicago as 500
as possible but Ev was undecided al
the present time
AIRS barrow collected thH auto
graphs of the twelve JUROR.
"Thcy are twelve nov friends. a"
she said "and viii keep them Tor
ever"
As soon as the verdict hccam,
! known ou the streets au American
flag WAS displayed from thy tiagpol'
Of the Labor Temple,
! Judge George " Hutton began hi
charge 90 the jury ut N.e0 o'clock thi
+ morning The count eliminated th,
first count In the indictment. tina
, barrow had bribcd George a. Lock
wood, regularly drawn Juror In th
case of j q. McNamara The cNi
dcncc Judge Hutton instructed. di'
not Justify verdict ol guilty ON th
l first count
b The second count charged parruy
{ with attempting oorruptly tu In
/ nuruco q man about 20 De- drawn q
a Juror
p The court also instructed that
Q verdict of guilty could not hr loun
y on the uncorroboTatrd evidence u
% accomplicos
q "tf YOU find no evidence lndcpcnd
Il rut of the testimony nt aycumpliccs,
r said the Judge, you must lind the de
r fondant noS guilty admission al
- legged to have been made to accom-
plicvs los the defendant should not b
4 regarded as rorroboratiNc. Tho test
mony of fcigncd accomplicc, how
% ever does not require COrrohorutiun,
q This applied to Lockwood,
e. 4 direct outcome of the abrupt end
e. Ing last November uf the trial of j /
McNamara for the dynamiting OF ih
b Los Angeles Times building. the tr.u
e. of Clarence = Darrow chot ui couu
Il scl for the Mcnamara d. 'lcrs, Na
tho result of AN indictment ry th
y county grand Jury for the ullegc
u bribery of George y, Lockwood,
n prospective juror In the McNamar
4 ease
D. ON November gN. tali, Bert }
r. Franklin. ohirf uf detectives of "a
D. McNamara defense WAS arrested "a
s the bribery of Lockwood. ON -,
ccmbrr the Mcnamara, brother
Il pleaded guilty j. % Mcnamara
r. murder In destroying the m'
n building, and i J Mcnamara Go Il,
namitug the Llrweliyn iron works.
~ ON January l5ta. F"anklln made
confession to Assistant District A
Al torucy Ford that hc had hrihed Rol
.c rrt T. Balm. Che hrst Juror sworn
.e try the McNamau case aud that D
I hau sought to bribe hNe other pro-
'' peclIvo jurors including Lockwoo