The Prince George's enquirer and southern Maryland advertiser. (Upper Marlborough, Md.) 1882-1925, 1912-03-22

,yNHE object of this suit is to procure
i a decree for the sale of certain
tracts of land situated in Brandywine
district, Prince Georges County, State
of Maryland, and aggregating One
hundred and ninety one Q91) acres of
land, more or less, of which tracts OF
land the said Complainant Rufus
Edmund Rawlings, and the Defendants
Missouri Henrietta Garner, Rex Daniel
Rawlings, Hattie Webster, Harriet
Davis and Elizabeth Davis, are seized
and possessed as tenants IN common.
The bill states that under the last will
and testament of "a CERTAIN Daniel
Garner, certified copy of which last
will and testament is filed with the Bill
marked Compartments Exhibit No l.,
said tracts of land containing 1911 acres,
more or less, were devised unto GER
tain Harriet Hyde and Ell zabeth Garner.
share and share alike. That the SAID
Harriet and Elizabeth were sisters, and
that the said Elizabeth, died, unmarried
and intestate, in Prince Georges
County aforesaid about II years ago,
and that the said Harriet Hyde, died a
widow, and intestate. in said County
on or about January Goth, 1919.
THAT the following named persons
are sole heirs at law of the said Eliza
beth Garner and Harriet Hyde, viz.
n)A nephew, the Complainant Rufus
Edmund Rawlings, whose wife is the
Complainant Julia q. Rawlings.
(2.) A niece, Missouri Henrietta
Garner. widow, one of the Defendants.
(3) A nephew, the Defendant Rex.
Danlel Rawlings, widower.
That the Complainant Rufus Edmun d
Rawlings, and the Defendants Rex
Daniel Rawlings and Missouri Henriet-
ia Garner are brothers and sister and
own together an undivided one-third
interest in said property.
az A niece, the Defendant Hattie
Webster. widow. That the said De-
PENDANT Hattie Webster owns an ua-
divided one.third interest in said
property.
90 A niece, the Defendant Harriet
Davis, unmarried.
(6.) A niece the Defendant Elizabeth
Davis, unmarried. That the Defendants
Harriet Davis and Elizabeth Davis, are
sisters and own together an undivided
one-third interest in said property.
That all of the parties both Com
plainant and Defendant are adults and
all reside in Prince Georges County,
aforesaid except the Defendants Harriet
Davis and Eliz abeth Davis who reside
in the Districs of Columbia. That the
said real estate above mentioned is not
susceptible of advantageous partitio n
any division in kind without great loss
and injury to the parties interested
therein, and that it would be far more
to the interest of said parties Complai-
nant and Defendant 10 have said real
estate sold under decree of Court and
the proceeds arising therefron to be
divided amongst The respective parties
in accordance with their respective
interests therein. The Bill also con-
tains PRAYER for general relief.
1t is thereon ordered on this 9th day
of March, 1912, by the Circuit Court
for Prince Georges County, in Equity,
that the Complainants by causing a
copy of this order to be published in
some weekly newspaper in Prince
Georges County, aforesaid once in each
of four successive weeks before the 9th
day of April, 1919, give notice to the
absent Defendants, Harriet Davis and
Elizabeth Davis, to be and appear in
this Court on or before the 23rd day
of April. 1919, either in person or by
Solicitor, to show cause if any they
have why decree ought not to be
passed as prayed.
RICHARD N. RYON,
Clerk of the Circuit Court for Prince
Georges County.
True Copy Test
Ms4t RICHARD N. RYON. clerk.