The Richmond climax. (Richmond, Ky.) 1897-1914, 1912-03-13

three years ago..
in which d. d. d. has simply washed
away the skin trouble. d. d: ID.
cleanses the skin of the germs of Ec-
zema, Psoriasis and other serious skin
diseases: stops the itch instantly, and
when used with ID. d. d. soap the cures
seem 10 be permanent Nothing like
D. d. d. for the complexion.
Trial bottle rs cents, enough to
prove the merit Of this wonderful vem-
edy.
hottie for 81 % on our absolute guar
antee that If this very first bottle fails
TO give you relief II will cost you moth
ing.
STOCKTON q SON
tied to $780, The law required this sum
to be paid out of the fees paid by these
applicants. OF course other legitimate
and necessary expenses were to be paid
out of the applicants fees also. The
Attorney General can doubtless recover
same by proper proceedings, and we
should ameud the law so that in the
future the surplus from these fees can
not be used as dividends
"As TO the student fund.-, l have
never been able to find what it amounts
TO. Here are some vouchers dated Sd
1911 and l2-l-l9ll, showing that DIR.
Krerick, who, understand, examined
the students and received the So, was
paid salary of S25 per month, and also
that his Office rent of SIS per month,
was paid, not out of the student fees,
but out of the $50, OOo appropriated by the
Legislature for other and specific pur-
poses.
From 1888 : to 1900 this fund
amounted to 50, 500 annually. J. N. Nc
Cormack's salary, from said fund, was
then 81, 200 annually, and his wife's
salary wOs $50 annually. In 1900 the
appropriation was increased TO IS 900.
DR. Mccormack then increased his
salary to 5000 per year, and his wife's
salary was increased in January, 1902,
to 500 per year, making SO 300 out of a
total of $1,000, exclusive of expenses.
APPOINTS HIS son.
In May, 1907, DR.. J. n. Mccormack
turned over his position as Sanitary In
spector to his son, Arthur, at a salary of
$3.50 per month. The minutes show
that Arthur was not appointed State
Sanitary Inspector until August %, 1907.
And DR.. Keller testified that Arthur has
not performed any services as Sanitary
Inspector since he (Keller) had been on
the board, and he was appointed in 1908;
that no report has over been made to
the board by Arthur and that, aside
from assisting his father, he knew Of
no service Arthur had rendered.
'Out of last years appropriation
fund find that the following money
has been wrongfully used;
March z, 1911, voucher in favor of
Arthur McCormack's expenses in
Bunce trial. six days, Louisville q. N.
claims to pay such prosecutions out of
practice act fundN $3.50.
April l, 1911, voucher in favor of J.
n. Mccormack, stenographer Bunce
trial, $40.
April l, 1911, voucher in favor of J.
n. Mccormack for DIR. Smock, s150.
April l. 1911, voucher in favor of de-
tec;ive agency, $40
april l, l01l, voucher in favor of
Bradley and Cureton, $3.50.
May l, 1911, voucher in favor of
Bradley and Cureton, $3.50.
June l, 1911, voucher in favor Of
Dr. Keller. Bunce matter, 50.
July Is, 1911, voucher in favor of
Dr. Mitchell, three days examination,
$50
July Is, 1911, voucher in favor of
Keller, grading papers, $40.
July Is, 1911, South, examinations,
$50.
August l, 1911, DR.. Aul, examina-
tions, $40
October 1. 1911, Kerrick, official ex-
aminer, $50.
October l, 1911, Berry and Graham,
s25,
December l, 1911, Kerrick, students
examinations, 500.
August |, 1911, Kerrick, five months
rent. s75.
Total, 81, OOS.3
''All of the above amounts, if due at
all, should have been paid from the
practice act fund add student fund
and not from the appropriation fund.
The appropriation fund was not in
cluded in any dividend resolution 1t
will be remembered, and there are
many reasons why the fund which sup
piled the dividends should be pre-
served as far as possible. DIR. j. N. Nc.
Cormack was not entitled to hold the
two positions which he held from 1900
to 1907. to-wit: Secretary of the board
at 81, 200 per annum and State Sanitary
Inspector at 81, 800 per annum. One or
the other of these salaries should be re-
funded to the State Since he claimed
he was working for the 'pittance' of
81, 200 annually, he should be required |
to refund the 81, 900 salary for the entire
seven years, that is s12, 600 This makes
over sl3, 900 from the appropriation fund |
that should be recovered, besides the
dividends and other illegal expendi-
lures that have been mentioned hereto
FORE"
CHARGES MACHINE.
To prove the existence OF machine
is often a difficult thing to do The ma
chine usually possesses all the proof
and it is difficult TO obtain. The proof
in this investigation has been secured in
a very large degree from the McCor-
macks themselves. 1t, therefore, must
be conclusive.
''There is a wide difference between
an organization and machine One
is operated for public purposes and the
0ther for private or selfish purposes. DIR,
Mccormack has perfected selfish ma
chine out Of the State Board Of Health.