The evening times. [volume] (Grand Forks, N.D.) 1906-1914, 1912-11-26
FORTY.TW0
CASES N LIST
= -
Long String Of Actions Will
Be Heard in the Dis
trict Court.

ing printed are:
Grand, Forks Lumber company vs..
b. W. Bernard, Mary Maloney, ct al,
law and fact; Geo. A. Bangs fol-
plaintiff and F. b. Feetham for de.
PENDANTS.
Charles F. wisner We. Northwest
ern Elevator company. law and fact;
son, Young and Lawrence for de-
Frank W. schlabers vs.. j. F.
Mosher. ct al, appeal case; Bangs
Cooley & Hamilton for plaintiff.
Bronson & Quigley for defendant.
Louis Roshoff VS. Joseph 2. Ben.
son, sheriff. fact; ]. B. Wineman and
o. B. Burtness for plaintiff, Scott
Rex for defendant.
Mechanics Insurance company, Law
and fact: Bangs & Robbins for plain
tiff, Barnett & Richardson for de-
PENDANT.
Louis Greenberg vs.. Hatcher Bros.
Corporation and J. z. Benson. sheriff,
law and fact; j. B.. Wineman for
plaintiff. Bronson & ouisley for de-
PENDANT.
Henry Heising Va. H. J. Martin, Law
and fact; o. b. Burtness for plaintiff.
]. B. Wineman for defendant.
A. s. Hogenson vs.. e. H. Sven. Of
al, law and fact; c. p. Brownies for
plaintiff. o. B. Burtness for defend
ant.
IS. H. williams vs.. Robert d. Eng
!tsh, ct ali. appeal ease. GA. Wilcox
for plaintiff. Scott Rex for defendant.
ct al. law and fact; o. b. Burtness
for plaintiff, F. B. Feetham ana L. A.
Chance for defendant.
Lewis Hart VI. p. c. Donovan. law
]. F. T. O'Connor for defendant.
John Jones We. ]. 2. Benson, sher-
1T. law and fact: o. B. Burtness for
PLAINTIFF. A. A. Davis for defendant.
Dinnie Brothers ". the Empire
Geo. A. Bangs for plaintiff, Murphy
& Dusgan for defendant.
Kent Realty & Investment COM
pany Va. Canada-North Dakota Land
company. law and fact 1.-TWO cases.;
=. B. Feetham for plaintiff, Bangs 4
Robbins for defendant.
Northwestern Mutual Savings and
Loan association VS.. Lizzie White, ap-
peal case: Scott Rex for plaintiff. W.
]. Mayer for defendant.
Grand Forks Lumber company VI.
Otto senum and liver Iverson, part
ners, law and fact; Beings q Robbins
for plaintiff. o. b. Burtness for de.
PENDANT.
Mary Brown vs.. Norton P. Brown;
Q. b. Burtness for plaintiff, Bangs,
Cooley & Hamilton for defendant.
f.. n. Peavler W. Andrew veitch,
ct al, law and fact; Murphy q Dug
gan for plaintiff. Scott Rex for do
wm: Burkeas. receiver Of the. e.
tate Of X. H. johnson, vs.. K. n.
johnson. ct al. law and fact; Murphy
= Dusgan Tor plaintiff. w. J. Mayer
James e. Door ". o. A. Wilcox, law
INC fact; Turner q Murphy for
G.. H. Robinson & Co, W. Louisville
& Nashville Railroad company. law
and fact: Murphy & DuEsan for
plaintiff. Watson & Young for de-
fendant.
I. E. Pierce. respondent. VI. George
w. Gets. appellant: H. A. Bronson
for respondent. H. King and A. q.
Wineman for appellant.
Gertrude Wallace. ct a.. respondent:
n. C.. Wagner for appellant. Scott
Rex for respondent.
b.. O.. Draxton. respondent, W. p. g..
Jensen, appellant; Y. B. Burtness for
respondent. H. A. Bronson for ap-
pellant. -.
=. NJ. Flick. doing business as
Flick Sales company. vs.. I. Feinstein.
plaintiff. w. ]. Mayer for defendant.
Nash Bros. v1. Julius Becker, law
and fact: Murphy & Duggan for
plaintiff. Bowen & Adams for defend
ant.
State Of North Dakota. W. VIM.
Joplin and James King. law and fact:
State Of North Dakota ex rel o. b.
Burtness vs.. VIM. Hayes. law and
fact: o. b. Burtness for plaintiff.
farmers State Bank Of Great Bend.
N. D., vs.. Louis Rosoff, ct a., law and
fact: w. s. Lauder for plaintiff, J. b.
Wineman for defendant.
Carl Neiss VI. Strut, appeal case;
]. B. Wineman for defendant.
Arthur @. sorlie vs.. Anton Ander.
son and Gertrude Anderson. law and
fact: J. B. Wineman for plaintiff. W.
Thomas Rcgan vs.. George T. La
Shell. law and fact: ]. A. Walsh for
plaintiff. A. A. Davis for defendant.
VIM. A. Reynolds vs. VIM. H. With
erstine; w. L. T. Goodison and F. b.
Feetham for plaintiff. Murphy q
Duggan for defendant.
John Paxderic vs. Ole Kalness. law
A. Davis for defendant.
W. c. Nash Va. T.. J. Smith, fact:
Scott Rex for plaintiff. F. b. Feetham
for defendant.
c. NJ. English We. d. N. McPhee.
fact: Scott Rex for plaintiff. Ernid
Scow for defendant.
Richard Schue and Phillip Matt VI.
Jacob pobmeier.. law and fact: O. b.
Burtness for plaintiff. J. b. Wineman
for defendant.
Julia Holicn vs. Knut Holien, law
and fact: u. Il. Burtness for plaintiff.
Bangs & Robbins for defendant.
Hart-Parr company We. Frank Fin
ley. law and fact: Rangs & Robbins
for plaintiff. u. b. Burtness for de-
PENDANT.
' ...