Audubon County journal. (Exira, Iowa) 1884-1993, 1912-10-17
Brandeis Shows Right to Organ.
ize Is Not Recognized.
THE PLATFORM is SILENT
Noted Lawyer Exposes the FiImsiness
Of Promises Made to Worklnsmen by
Perkins and His Candidate, Who
Stands for Private Monopoly.

1c6A6AdI1Ou lOOhluS W Iuc pT0V0uLlOu OF
occupational diseases, overwork, invol
untary unemployment and other in.
furious effects incident to modern in
dustry,' but nowhere in that
long and comprehensive platform
can there be found one word
approving the fundamental right OF
labor to organize or even recognizing
this right without which all other
grants and concessions for improve
ment Of the condition Of the working
men are futile. The platform promises
social and industrial justice, but does
not promise Industrial democracy. The
justice which it offers is that which
the benevolent and wise corporation
is prone to administer through its vel
fare department. There is no promise
Of that justice which free American
workingmen are striving to secure for
themselves through organization. In.
deed, the industrial policy advocated
by the new party would result in the
denial OF labor's right to organize.
"The new party stands for the per.
petuation and extension of private
monopoly from which the few have
ever proited at the expense of the
many and for the dethronement Of
which the people have, in the past,
fought so many valiant battles. That
cursed product of despotism, the nav
party, proposes to domesticate in our
republic, proclaiming, We do not fear
commercial power Certainly organ.
lied labor has had experience with the
great trusts which should teach all
men that commercial power may be SC
great that it is the part of wisdom tc
fear it,
The above declaration was made by
Louis D. Brandeis before the conven.
ton of the American Federation of
Labor, Massachusetts, state branch, at
Fitch5mg, Sept. 10.
Of Supreme Importance.
He urges careful study of the new
party platform, particularly It's effect
upon labor noting not only WHAT IT
CONTAINS, but WHAT 1T OMITS.
adding, When you make that exami-
nation you will find that there is a
significant omission and that this skill
fully devised platform TAKES FROM
LABOR MORE THAN 1T GIVES"
Labor Record Of Trusts.
Mr.. Brandeis then lays bare the la
Dor record Of the trusts, declaring that
great trusts-the steel trust, the sug-
ar trust the beef trust, the tobacco
trust, the smelter trust and whole
troop of lesser trusts-have made the
determination of organized labor from
their factories the very foundation
stone of their labor policy. The abili.
ty to defeat labor's right to combine
seems to have been regarded by the
trust magnates as proper test of the
efficiency of their capitalistic combina
ton"
Mr.. BRandeis shows that in 1899
during the Colorado sme!ters' strike
the American Smelling and Refining
company closed it's mills where the
strikers had been employed and trans
ferred the work to other mills, thus
breaking the strike. The United States
Steel corporation had similar success
in 1901 with the Amalgamated Asso
citation of Iron and Steel Workers
Had the association been dealing with
competing employers the result would
have been different The United States
Steel trust was prompt in introducing
this plan. June II, 1901, six weeks
after 1t began its operations, its execu.
tive committee passed this vote, which
was offered by Charles Steele, a part
ner of George w. Perkins in the firm
of j. P. Morgan & Co.:
| That we are unalterably opposed tc
any extension Of union labor and ad
wise subsidiary companies to take firm
position when these questions come ur
and say that they are not going to rec
ognize it-that is. any extension of un
ion in mills where they do not now
exist"
Union Men Not Wanted.
The result was that the bulk OF