The Seattle star. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1899-1947, 1912-07-08

Damaging Evidence Agar
:. scuxrsssicnal Subcommittee
- !. ,nysssisa,ing the in'peaeh'
u. tlsrrss against ludse G y.
s,.,d os the circuit court began
..x.u.h ssy this moruinS BY ths
80 i .ss.imony In refsrenec TO
= ,II~xsd drunkenness ,,.
~, 3 senator samuel u. filss
.s.~.,sd 10 sss Attorney John =.
- ts drop the Impeachment
s>dlrxs against Federal judge
~ p.sferd and that the matter
psrryx arrest following the
a,enIxna rink protest meeuas
,x 8 -f.xst up. was iniimatcd
~ roruirx IN questions propound-
~ crrxr,ssman W. i Mccoy to
ss.sr Piles who Was called oy
rS~. psnfcrd's attorneys as
.,s,ssr aRnexs to testify that
-. Hsnferd never vas under the
a~see Of liquor
Hsnford Heard Of y.
~ il answer 10 McCoY = GUS.
~ h.d 10 admit that be- had
~ upon Perry withia a mouth
: g Il the nreamland rink meet.
= = ! personal friend ootn q
Efn Hsnforsi and Of Perry to al.
70 th< latter that The sharse~
20. without Foundation. This le-
- uouths before the impsaeh-
r1r1 charges had been filed. and
Fl~ MD hat Judge Hanford told
I- ~ ke had heard. through a
1lnrl vko had spoken 70 Perry
~ they would be forshcomins
IN also spsn, a busy half hour
xrhnisx that he didnt know
~ sbsas rhe Sallivsn stil case.
uracuxh his firm u attorneys dis
severed heirs 10 ireland for the mil
kcn dollar estate. and received an
saNuoas ~.
Rlss vas xsked By Representa-
tIss ncCoy 10 explain bow Judge
r1nnxt rot jurisdiction Of that
- 6urlnx one pars OF the litiga'
u Pilos referred the commit y
= his forner partner. James u.
Np~s, ncv attorney for the Seattle
uurlrse ca Howe was called 70
~ q sooa today.
49, oes~e<sh Called.
~ skim menbef u Piles firr.,
lunT Ftdefsl Judxe George Don
vo11h atso testified this morning
T. judm Hanford had a peculiar.
\ 4 apg<zring drowsy. although
tclng ejoee attention. Judge
nnsestk however, eontradicf~d
- lestinosy Of Hanford's frtenGs
- 1op<ared before today when ne
~ hat H4nfofd exhibited this
peslitr.ty more In the new federal
MI1|ng In recent yeags than In The
r federal building four and more
Ynn asp The witness explained
- peeuhar.ty partly 10 poor ven.
Mziaa 10 TIE court room.
y snsssr 10 . direct question by
e1|FMsa Graham. Judge oon~orth
- hss he never grsrsed new
~ IN SINE other reason than
- wDes BY the attorneys arguing
0 ~, although he explained
- : fsdssaI ,vcge would have the
Qrsliss - to do.
04hsr Character Witnesses
Olhks character Witnesses called
- norning were y. G. Merritt ~
Ahrm II BogIe, Spooner. Harding
; Nenttf. attorneys for the Ia
- Pacific r. n. and the O>W..
Nv. Bclzter. court stsnographeT.
e. VA employed BY Piles, Don
IN I Howe to transcrfbe testi-
- n Ireland In the Sullivan will
- n1d A. c. Bowman. United
~ commissioner by appoint
- u Judge Hanford.
q Saturday is witnesses we're
nintd, all but one testlfying as
1cea friends or close acquaint-
- Axf the Judge was never seen
-. BY them. and that he pos
- peculiar characteristics
a hs,r, s,,,s. .ai aa,.,.' sae .'1ps sI,.,s =
~
sn~,...,.. rs..,..
4 Hsrr p,s e's,''o'' ",.a.n..,
- a. rs NJ, n'o~n, ,'',s,,,, an = s,,orney u,., },
Il Z. s.sss vssn ,.pis,,. p,sc,lelng ~ seattle s
lr6rd /. '''',ssu n,','s..,. ~ saw 'uose
~ shseh =. u'.iSn as.,'a,sa.oS y" ,..' sne
~ d,avss,ass ss ns echs,asIea ,slss REQ com. y
- ussssd Mn {. , ~ or.e sn.e.o,',', ,ns
~ eoart r,x,a % IA ~ ~ a".a,"'''.' ~, ,.saa
~ S1,se, me- ne 49,. a. ~ w 49,. .i.sa
r. tkaf one r,gh, % 80. .nH1y ,td
~ ID sueh % : 1'sn. sla,.,'s.,.'. ne .a~ l,s sae
- - s,.. ''ssssss'ns ~ i Sohul' %
~ 80 ~N+t A1t hbAhb upthf