The evening times. [volume] (Grand Forks, N.D.) 1906-1914, 1912-07-01

New York are under the influence of
Morgan and Ryan and Belmont. the
'plutocrats Of this convention he
omits one name. Outside Of the three
he has named the richest and most
powerful plutocrat on the floor is the
gentleman from Nebraska himself. II
the New York delegation is to be pre-.
vented from participation. then any
man who for pay has been writing
from the floor Of a republican con-
vention in favor Of Mr.. Bryan's part
ner and ally. Theodore Roosevelt
ought also to be excluded.
Colonel Bryan never intended to
ton unless that candidate was Mr.
Bryan himself"
As the poll proceeded 1t became CD.
parent that Clark would again get
New York's ninety votes under the
unit rule. It was generally believed
that the vote has been CHALLENGED and
the poll demanded for the sole pur-
pose Of enabling stanchfleld to de.
liver his attack on Bryan.
OF the four delegates-at-large John
A Dix. Alton B. Jarker and Charles
F. Murphy voted for Clark. Senator
O'Gorman voted for Wilson. The dis
trict delegates who voted for Wilson
were Abraham I. Elkus of New York
city. John B. stanchfield and Thomas
F. Conway. Plattsburg: Thomas w
Meacham Of Syracuse, Benedict
Bronks of Pearl Creek and Walter H
Edison Of Falconer.
William Temple Emmet Of New
York city and Joseph A. Kellogg OF
Great Falls voted for Underwood. I'm
der the unit rule New York's ninety
votes went to Clark.
Illinois. which had been passed in
the roll call. cast its f1fty-eight votes
for Clark.
The Illinois delegates filed into
their seats while the pool Of the New
York delegation was in progress
Their caucus resulted in a determine
ton to stand by Clark for whom afty-
eight votes had been cast since the
beginning of the ballotting.
The result Of the '--:enty-seventh
ballot was: Clark 46s. Wilson 406 4
Underwood 112, Foss 3s, Marshall 80,
Harmon 20. Bryan 1. absent IN.
This gave Clark gain of 5h, Will
son loss of 1 and Underwood a loss
of half as compared with the twenty
sixth ballot. A resolution was intro
duced by John Knox of Alabama de-
ploring the bitterness of the conven-
ton and calling for united front to
facilitate the work. 1t was referred
to the resolutions committee.
The twenty-eighth roll call went as
far as Indiana before any material
ss,1y went wild as .., Senator % shiyely a. an, J,
When quiet was restored a.poll was
demanded but the demand was later
withdrawn. The Indiana vote had
heretofore gone solid to Marshall.
After comforting with number of
the delegates Mr.. Bryan said 1t was
unlikely he would reply to the speech
of Mr.. Stanchfield. 1t was reported
that Senator Raynor Of MARYLAND
might seek an opportunity to defend
The New Mexico delegation de-
manded a poll after the vote had
been reported Eight for Clark" The
roll call showed Clark s. Wilson 8,
and under the unit rule the eigh.
went to Clark.
The Oklahoma delegation was poll
ed but the vote remained Clark 10.
Wilson 10.
Pennsylvania added one to her US
oa1 rhe vote e,eiai sa vote 5Ss on 'sn the twenty
ninth ballot stood: Total 1893:
Clark 4ss 1-2; Wilson 4s6: Under
wood 112:. Harmon 20; Kern 4: Foss
SO; absent 1-2.
The thirtieth ballot was then or
dered. There was no choice on this
ballot. Vermont dropped Foss and
ct0daas to sen sEh syas th New 5s
gained 10 from Harmon in Ohio. The
vote on the thirtieth onicial ballot
stood: Total 1.0s8: Clark 456; Will
son $50; Underwood 121 Ia; Har.
mon 10: Kern 2: Foss 80; absent. 1-2.