The Salt Lake tribune. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1890-current, 1912-07-30
|RON GIVES
Fl HISTORY
IN TEST T||NONY
sed Lawyer Relates How
Recanle Connected With
Narnara Case Against
Ijis Personal Wishes.
nES FRANKLIN
( EVIDENCE IN TOTO
nse Scores Important Vic
\ n Gaining Consent of
|osecution to Produce
ktsers and kilograms.
,ra4ional News Service.

~ -
national News Service.
4 ANGELES. Cal, July ee.-clar-
rsoe s, Darrow. who is on trial
fof the alleged bribery Of Jurors
a the Mcnamara trial. went on
fhe wstnoss stand shortly after
(ds afternoon and began his at
y way Of testimony. on the case
d AGAINST him by the prosecution
was permitted for the most part
Intended answers, which amount
narrative Of the events involved
fhan formal answers TO questions
Nd He spoke rapidly. earnestly
fh appearance OF a desire to be
Vith tho jury.
bofcrB adjournment Darrow teetf-
that he gave no $1,000
b Bert Franklin on October 6. He
fhat he Gid give him q $1,000
n3ust as I gave him checks before,
|er that date in the regular course
ness, for legitimate purposes.
tlin testified that Darrow gave
heck October following q con-
on October about jury bribery,
at he used the money gotten on
eek in the payment OF the S4o0
Dr Robert Balm
Of $1,000 Check.
DW's testimony today discloses the
|Iou Of tho defense to be that the
heck was given the day before
|n claims Darrow talked to him
Jury bribery, and that no check
no was given October s. The
b October 4 Will be introduced In
|e tomorrow morning.
oU, with flushed face. directed his
|ny straight to the jury. In an
b questions by Earl Rogers, his
.6unsel, he named tho big labor
hi which he has been concerned.
15 counsel or arbitrator, and men
he various public positions he has
HIS story relating To the bribery
gan with the visit to him at his
b Chicago of Mrs. Orte McMant-
/ George Behm. uncle of McMani-
Tune of 1911,
McManigal did not believe the
ents given out by the Burns peo-
what her husband had confessed
|a thought IL McManigal had made
B was done under compulsion and
The Burns people. she said, had
hcr money to pay her expenses II
1uld go to California and support
fsbhnd In his story, but she re-
barrow detailed how he arranged
b. McManigal and Benin to go to
ngcles, where McManigal was In
He agreed to pay their ex-
on of Behm.
|antcd Behm 10 see McManiga.l and
1( whether he had made a contes-
neither 1t was true, and If il Were
Qe TO tell him that II he wanted
oe 80 would act as his attorney
)arrow.
1ever asked Benin to try to get
'!eal TO change his testimony. Nc.
y mad not testified and there was
<empt 10 get him To change his
PT Neither did / say TO Mrs
risal ! will get you out OF this
WI inc case ! told Mrs. Me.
y 70 get ali out OF the Burns peo,
g could and would pay the re,
"a OF her expenses
~ tesnued that ne employed join
'a1eloh TO take charge OF the col,
" evidence for the defense. II,
tnat ne had known Harrington
~ lllteen years. most Of whicl
-fa..uelon n was employed by tin
Sty railway. Twice he had col
~ i5aueilce Tor Darrow. but he hat
~ any aiflliation with union la
np.oyed him because T considero.
q |s,sinpe' IN gathering evidence an,
.,2s wltnesseS. and I put mir
oi 'hat work." said Darrow.
,e' one Cooncy and Fitzpatrick
~ 81 Whom I had ever seen O
r auu altogether he probably ha,
-'h working under him"
Life Record.
the detail testimopv ,os ..,
h. byo,n.yI,p .y,p OF the manner In whicI
be- 5s ya. Into the case. He said h
II tIrraS n's s,l olo next April. and TIM
r1er roar e ne iapor leaders to emplo
III oY,nnri ior the Mcnamara defense
hi Iahor ol the american Teds era
|tcreonor many Of whom were hi
Ee The .ttisloSs insisted that he un
hy thnnn e,'oe; lie was finally in
Sorsk ,Iuehl ,n 70 become CHIEF couuse
NJ oaIJ ,h W. ms practice In Chicago
civjl ca" t II mad been about nlns
.nq That fully q third Of ~ ~ iiliIlS
~ ~ peen charity. i''ah
3elense won an jn,norto,
lonsed argumen, todaV IN eaT viT.or
ssnt OF District Aftnrr,, ~ 9slniLi
tasn over TO the defendon, i: ~
6 6',sTs r,, and telegrams he has Gnptt in y;
"a In ,,rnTdIportlng to bo writton by Da,
r,6sIsr 6Isr his orders, District 4 ne, tta,
.fts,, assented 10 that nrrano,
~ a long argument in ths no',s. ouS
IA osers put several witnessoa :
, srd including his assocIate Jo@ To7., 9
ASs'stant District Attornt
= Loses a Point.
mse attempted but faflod r. :.
cfnra faoe e., the testimony of O. 4 Va S
te the p grand Jury. in which o. -,
~ ~ ned to Darrow any OF M tbn tihr u -
~ ne got on the $40, 900 checL Lo I,nJi ,n1i
- l'r narrow in Son Ersr"daa whi'
fs sun had q balance oS ah",
4fhe total amount vi aoo'
~ LeaWtt was finally a,
eHis M morning and the thiyt ul
- NJ Blakesley. took his ,i rione eeeh
tr,s}1 Juror This Is the 80 f,rat p'hcf f,r
.fb fbtql q IN this country In w wi,oh ~ In
Sss}s n Juror has fillod a yacanov wnneH a., !,
&M0u hU - In