davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
0riF for Hearing proofs d will.
STATE OF MINNESOTA, l..
C1,,,, 49, - ~

slA coan 0s a oe SroEn' SIS.
In Probate Court
Special Term. April 9th, 1912.
In the Matter of the Estate of Maria
Grossmann, Deceased.
Whereas, an instrument in writing, purporting
to be the last will and testament of Maria
Grossmann, late of said county, has been de-
hvered to this court.
And Whereas, Franz Hogen has filed
herewith his petition, representing among other
things that said Maria Grossmann, died In said
county. on the 10th day Of April A. D. 1912,
testate and that said petitioner is the sole ex.
ecutor named in said last will and testament,
and praying that said instrument may be ad.
mitted to probate and that letters testamentary
be to him issued thereon.
1t Is Ordered, that the proofs of said instrument
and the said petition, be heard before this Court
ct the Probate Office in the Court House in the
City Of New Ulm, in said County, on the 9th day
OF MAY. A. d. 1919, at 10 O'Clock in the fore
noon, when all concerned may appear and con-
test the probate of said instrument
And it is further ordered, that public notice OF
the time and place of said hearing be given to
AL persons interested, by publication OF copy
OF this order for three successive weeks previous
to said day of hearing In the New Ulm Review
aWeekly newspaper printed and published ut the
Clty OF New Ulm, In said county.
Dated at New Ulm, Ninn.. April o.,
A. u. 1917. By the Court,
GEO.ROS
(SEAL.) Judge of Probate.
1870
Albert Steinhauser,
Attorney for Petitioner.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS

Notice is hereby given, that an action has
been commenced in this Court by the above
PENDANTS; That the object Of said action is to
have the Plaintiff adjudged the owner in fee
simple and entitled to the possession of the
real property in the complaint and herein.
after described, and to further adjudge that
the Defendants. above named. and each OF
them and also all other persons unknown, have
no right. title, estate interest or lien in or to
The real property affected by said action is
situated in the County of Brown in the State of
Minnesota, and Is described as follows, to wit I:
Outlets Thirty-three ($9. Thirty-four lS4,
seven 1877. all in the City of New Ulm.
according to the plat of said City on file and
of record in the Office Of the Register Of Deeds
In and for said County of Brown.
Dated April Is, 1912.
SoxsEN, DEMPSEY & MUELLER,
Plaintiffs Attorneys
16-2l New Ulm, Minnesota.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15

Washington, May 12.-The makeup
of the Republican national convention,
60 far as the original selection of dele.
gates can determine 1t, will be prac-
tically settled within week. The
widely divergent claims of Taft and
Roosevelt managers make it apparent,
however, that a determination of the
actual control of the convention is
impossible in advance Of the meeting
of the national committee June s. The
committee will take up at that time
contests involving the seats of at least
1854 delegates and it is not unlikely
that additional contest cases will be
announced by the time the committee
begins work.
Up to the present 7s6 Of the 1.O7S
delegates to Chicago have been chos-
en-, according to Roosevelt estimates,
while the Taft forces record twenty
less. The differences arise over Mary
land, where the Taft managers declare
the control of sixteen delegates will
not be cleared until the state conven-
ton, and Kansas, where the Roose-
welt records show fourteen have been
chosen and the Taft records ten.
Representative Mckinley, head of
the Taft campaign, claimed 4S3 dele
gates for the president, and conceded
237 to Roosevelt. Senator Dixon, man.
ager for Colonel Roosevelt, claimed
319 for Roosevelt and conceded 143 to
Taft
The Roosevelt managers contend
that ia delegates are uninstructed,
including Lightweight from New York,
and that 164 are contested. Both cam.
paign committees, in their tables, give
Senator La Toilette thirty-six dele
gates and Senator Cummins ten.
Preparations for the two weeks bat
tie at Chicago over the seating of con-
tested delegations are being completed
rapidly by the attorneys for both fac
tons. While but few contests have
been filed thus far with the national
the managers and their at
torneys will be ready with all of the
cases by May 20, the date on which
the papers must be before the commit
tee.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
Order for Hearing on Petition to Convey
Lands ON Contract.

Order tor Hearing on Petition to Convey
Lands on Contract.
STATE OF MINNESOTA. L.
County Of Brown So.
r." In Probate Court,
q, Special Term, April 29th, 1912
MIL In the matter Of the estate of Matthias
On Reading and Filing the Petition of Albert
e.. Blank, claiming to be entitled to con.
.xeyance Of certain real estate from the
Executor 81 said estate, setting forth that
Asthias 1auch, deceased, was bound by
10 the sid Albert q. Blank upon the terms
and conditions therein stated, with q descrin-
tion of the land to be conveyed. and the facts
epOn whic0 such claim to cOnveyance ia pre-.
dictated. aa6 praying that the Probate Court
make ad0aree authorizing and directine the
said Lofs0s 4auch, Executor, to convey said
rea! estate to said petitioner Is the person
entitled 0groto.
1t is Therefore Ordered, That all persons
lntereste& IN said estate may appear before this
Court, at special term thereof to be held on
o'clock IA the. forenoon. at the Probate Office
in the Court House in New Ulm in said County,
and oppose said petition.
And 1t ia Further Ordered, That this order
shall be publis he'd once in each week for three
succ essive weeks prior to said day of hearing in
the New Ulm Review a weekly newspaper
County. '"'"
Dated at New Ulm, Mimi, the 2sth day of
By the Court.
lSealI GEO. Ross
IL ~ Judge Of Probate.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
IshaAY IS WARMLY GREETED
Received With Cheers on LANDING at
Liverpool.

Liverpool. ...
Liverpool, May ia large crowd
cheered J. Bruce Ismay, managing di.
rector Of the White Star line, as he
came down the gangway of the Adri.
attic with his wife, who had gone on
board at Queenstown and accompanied
him here.
Mr.. 1smay lifted his hat in acknowl-
edgment of the reception, but excused
himself from making any statement
to the press, saying he still was suf-
tering from the strain of the disaster.
He had. he said, already given a
plain. unvarnished statement to a re-
sponsible and adequate commission
and he thought his evidence to be
given before the British court Of in
quiry should not be anticipated.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
BRANDT LOSES HIS FIGHT
Former Schiff Valet Returned e
Tombs by Supreme Court.

New York, May 11.-Folke E.
Brandt, formerly valet to Mortimer L.
schiff. who was released from Dam
hemora prison on habeas corpus de-
cision of Justice Gerard in the su-
preme court, is again in the Tombs
and may be returned to prison to serve
out the thirty years to which he was
sentenced five years ago by Justice
Rosalsky in the court Of general SEES
sions. In decision the appellate
division of the supreme court reversed
the decision Of Justice Gerard, who
liberated Brandt.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
sEED BED FOR eARl Ev.

Whatever the nature Of the soil may
be. q we'll prepared seed bed is neces.
sary. The ground should be ploved
and worked until a deep, we'll pulysrl
lied, level seed bed is obtained. Such
bed will most efficiently aid in SUN.
plying the necessary factors for ear-
mination. heat. moisture and oxygen.
AS a general rule. when the seed bed
N properly prepared. 1t needs no furth.
er cultivation after planting. II the
season Is dry and the ground iumnv
and loose from spring blowing, Il may
be rolled and followed With an even
tooth harrow.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15

nv r.. Z. l(r,,eai .ae.y

Barley q Z. cash crop deserves care
ful attention By progressive ttrsIers
II one variety Of recognized value q
grown and care taken that varieties
30 not mixed. the. crop viii 81 more
valuable on the market since thoS malt.
stsrs desire . barley which will Germ.
mate ct the Same time. Investigations
show that the majority OF maltstsrs
prefer the six-rowed bearded barley.
Barley may b grown In rotation
probably and 10 one Of the bsst
nurse crops 70 use In seeding clovers
or grasses. Statistics for the entire
country show that barley Il exceeded
only BY corn In average yield and
value per acre. and In dIgestiblos mn.
trients, which represent its feeding
value, 1t ie also second only to corn.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
PRESIDENT MAY
VETO The BILL
House Votes TO Abolish the Com.
merce Court.

Warrington, May 11.-By an over.
whelming vote the house passed the
executive, legislative and judicial bill.
which abolishes the United States
commerce court, retains the United
States minis at San Francisco, New
Orleans and Carson City, with six
assay omces, and consolidates several
government bureaus.
1t was mistakenly rumored In the
house that President Taft might veto
the appropriation bill to save the
court.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
INVESTIGATE PATENT LAWS
President Asks Power to Appoint q
Commission.

VsSOS0SuS- U0NO VO"SV 70 %pO0VUS
Commission.
Washington, May 12.-President
Taft sent special message to con.
gress asking for legislation to au.
thorize him to appoint a commission
to investigate the patent laws and re.
port what changes were necessary to
make them fit modern conditions.
The president gave several reasons
to show the needs of change. He re-
ferred to the recent patent monop-
oily" decision of the supreme court,
through which users Of a certain ma
chine were compelled to buy from the
company which sold the machine a
certain kind of ink for use with It. and
enumerated five other reasons which
he said demanded the revision of the
patent laws
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
Order for fearing Application. for Appoint
ment Of Administrstor,
COUNTY OF BROWN, IS.


ment Of Administrator.
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
COUNTY OF BROWN, So.
In Probate Court.
General Term. May 9th, 1912.
In the matter of the estate of Eduard
Maltzahn, Deceased.
On receiving aud fling the petition If
Anna Maltzahn of the Countv ~
Brown representing among other things.
that Eduard Maltzahn, late of the COUNTY
OF Brown in the State Of Minnesota. on the
9th day Of April, A. D. 1912, at the
County of Brown, died intestate, and he.
ing an inha bitant of this County at the
time of his death, leaving goods, chat.
tells. and estate within this County. and
that the said petitioner is the widow ~
said deceased. and praying that adminis-
trat1on OF said estate be to w. T, Eckstein
granted;
It is ordered, that said petition be heard
before said Court, on Saturday the list
day OF June A. D. 1912, at 10 O'clock. A.
r., at the Probate Office, in the Court
HOUSE, In New Ulm, in said County.
ordered further, that notice thereof he
&ivea to the heirs of said deceased and to
al persons interested, by pubiishinS
TINS order once in each week for three
successive weeks prior to said day of
nearing, in the New Tim Review, a weekiv
Newspaper printed and published at New
dd Da te nat at New Ul H. Minnesota, this 9Th
,ou GEO. Ross,
lSealI Judge Of Probate.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
GOOD BARLEY, GOOD PRICE,

The best barley always brings .
much higher price than the ordinary
grades. It pays to separate your
weather-beaten and damaged barley,
and either feed 1t on the farm or SEQ
that It 10 shipped separately.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
COLONEL IS NOT ALARMED
Says He Will Not Attend CHICAGO
Convention.

Oyster Bay, May. Ill am not
frightened" said Colonel Roosevelt
when his attention was called to re-
ports that he had become alarmed at
the course Of the campaign and would
attend the Republican national con.
vention in Chicago as a proxy dele
gate from Brooklyn. Colonel Roose-
volt laughed at the report and added:
II am not going to Chica4o." $50
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
DEMAND ACTION ON LIQUOR
Resolution Adopted by Methodist
Conference.

Conference.
Minneapolis. May IA threat that
1t the national legislators in Washing
ton do not take heed of the temper.
ance movement it will soon become
an issue in presidential elections and
In the balloting for members of the
senate and house of representatives
was made in the presentation of a
resolution which the Methodist Epis-
copal general conference adopted
unanimously.
The resolution was in a report from
the committee on temperance, of
which J. Frank Hanly, former govern
or OF Indiana, is chairman. The re-
port called on congress to pass the
kenyon-Sheppard-Webb-Mc Nc umber bill
to prohibit the interstate shipment of
liquor In dry territory.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
Legal Advertisements
Order to Examine Accounts.
STATE OF MINNESOTA,
COUNTY OF BROWN.

STATE OF MINNESOTA,
COUNTY OF BROWN. 80
In Probate Court,
Especial Term, April q, 1912.
In the matter of the estate of Otto
On reading and fling the petition Of
Adelia Schell Administrative of the
estate Of Otto Schell, deceased, rep
resenting, among other things. that she
has fully administered said estate, and
praying that a time and place be fixed for
examining and allowing the final account
of her administration. and for the assign.
ment of the residue Of said estate to the
parties entitled thereto by law:
It IL ordered, that said account be ex.
amined. and petition heard by this Court.
on Thursday the 23rd day of Nav, a.
D. 1912, at 10 O'clock A. NJ, at the Probate
Office. in the City of New Ulm in said
AND it is further ordered, that notice
thereof be given to all persons interes-
ted by publishing copy of this order
once in each week, for three successive
Zeeks prior to said day Of hearing in the
New Uim Review, q weekly newspaper,
printed and published at New Ulm In
said county.
De, Z e Io, New Ulm the e5th day of
Blythe Court
(SeaD GEO. ROSS.
IL ~ Judge of Probate.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15

J. A. Alderman, West Plains, No.,
was In bed With kidney trouble and
rheum atism, but Foley Kidney Pills
put him on bis feet. He says: II vas
no better when q friend recomm ended
Foley Kidney Pills. They benefited
me from the start and Ia . few days
was out of bed and in IA days threw
away my cane. I cheerfully recon.
mend Foley Kidney Pills. o. NJ.
Olsen.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15

A stubborn cough that hangs on
weakens the system and may easily
develop dangerous condition of the
lungs. Earl Fair Waukeshs, Wise,
says: my stubborn cough refused to
respond to ordinary treatment and
l finally resorted to the old reliable,
Fo!ey's Honey. and Tar Compound,
and less than two bottles effected q
complete cure" o. II. Olsen.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
WHY DON'T THEY7

why Is this barley 50 bushel
while that over there is but IS cents?"
asked young lady at a grain show
last fall.
well. you see this is seed barley"
well. then, why don't they all
grow seed barley and nothing else?"
'Why don't they? Well-er-oh!"
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15

Mother cray's Sweet Pswders for Chfldrea.
Relieve Feverishness, Bad Stomach,
Teething Disorders, move and regu.
late the Bowels and are pleasant
remedy for Worms. Used by Mothers
for u years. They never fail. At oil
Druggists, 25c. Sample FREE. Ad.
dress, A. 8. Olmsted, Leroy, N. Y.
1872
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
State of Minnesota. L..
County of Brown. %

District Lourt
Ninth Judicial District
Christian Filzen,. Plaintiff.
#a VS..
Johann Mayer, Adam Meyer,l
Margaretha Mayer. John
Mayer, August Mayer, Her
mann Mayer, Albert Mayer,
Amy Mayer, Philip Grohs,
Philip Gross, Hermann
Bodenstein, Peter Breith.
German Land Association, q
corporation, Joseph Hitz, and
Mrs. Joseph. Hitz, his wife,
also all other persons un-
known claiming any right,
title, estate, interest or lien
In the real estate described
in the complaint herein,
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
A Gr.a, BuiI1laf Falls

when its foundation 10 under mined. and
il the foundation Of health good diges.
tion-is attacked, quick collapse follows.
On the first signs of indigestion, DR..
King's New Life Pills should be taken to
tone stomach and regulate liver, kidneys
and bowels. Pleasant. easy, safe and only
% cents ct O. NJ. Olsen.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
TWO ARKANSAS CONVENTIONS
TAFT and Roosevelt Supporters Select
Four Delegates.

Little Rock, Ark, May 8.-Two Re-
publican state conventions, one attend.
cd by supporters Of President Taft
and the other by adherents of Colonel
Roosevelt met here. Each claimed for
Itself regularity. Each elected four
delegates at large from Arkansas and
instructed them to cast their votes in
the national convention according to
the sentiment of the delegates At
tending.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15

Reduced Excursion Rates
via M. & st. L. to Twin Cities will be
sold May 8, May Is and May q. g
for round trip, return Limit June Is.
Rates opeo to oil.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15

TAFT CLAIMS Delegates
elected, 766; instructed for
president, 4S3; instructed for
Roosevelt, 237; instructed for
La Toilette, SO; Cummins, 10.
ROOSEVELT cLAIMS-Del-
egates elected, 1856; instructed
for Roosevelt, 319; instructed
for president, 143; for La Fol
lette, SO; for Cummins, 10; I'M
instructed, III; contested, 164.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
SUMMONS AND LIS PENDEN6.
STATE Of Minnesota \.
" - - 81 4 District Court,
Ninth Judicial District.
Chriatlan Filson ~ ........ Plaintiff IL

4& Ninth Judicial District
Christlan Fil.en 80. ....... Plaintiff
| -essaA ~ ".
August Hamich, Anton Ramsauer,l
George Kramer, Jr.. John Scholl.
John 1dner, Erans Baggeler.
| Henry Casper, G. l.. Blanchard
and John Schu6 enecker, also all
other persons unknown claiming
any right title, estate, interest
or lien, in the real estate de-
scribed in the complaint herein.
..... y. Defendants.
Tho State Of Minnesota to the above named
defendants:
You ana each Of you are hereby summoned
and required to answer the complaint OF the
Plaintiff tn the above entitled action, which Is
filed in the office Of the Clerk of the District
Court Of the Ninth Jndicial District in and for
the County OF Brown and State of Minnesota,
and to serve copy Of your answer to the said
complaint on the subscribers, at their office In
the City Of New Ulm in said county within
twenty days after tho service Of this summons
upon you exclusive OF the day Of such service; ;
and II you fail 10 answer the said complaint
within the time Aforesaid, the plaintiff In this
action Will apply to the Court for the relief
demanded in the complaint.
Dated April IS, 1912.
SOAsEN, DEMPSEY Il MUELLER.
Plaintiffs Attorneys,
New Ulm. Minnesota.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15

F. p. Starr 81. J. Wagon
Mimi. Winona, MINI.
Effective March 18th, 1919
GOING EAST.
No 5l6-Daily, new line. !. !. LIPS N
Thre to Twin Cities and the East "
No 22-Ex Sunday, old line. Is . N
Connects ct KASota for Twin Cities or Aankato
No 514-Daily, new line. i. 1889 p "a
Thro to Twin Cities and tho East
No 24-Daily, old line. !. ). BAL p m
No 14-Ex Sunday, new line. .6.55 p N
Omaha.
GOING WEST
No 5l7-Dsily, new line. .l:O6 Q m
Thro from Twin Cities and the East
No 13-Ex Sunday, old line. 1912 m
Thro to Tracy
No 5O3-Daily, new line. 1850 m
Thro from Twin Cities and the East
No 23-Dsily, old line. .1:35 p m
No 27-Ex Sunday, old line. $40 p m
Connects ut Mankato Junction with trains from
East and ut KAsOta with Twin Cities.
No. ~ now makes sharp connection
with Omshs No. at Kssota for ell
points North, arriving st. Paul 1925
.. M, Minneapolis 1885 .. N.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15

The State Of Minnesota, to the above
named Defendants:
You and each of you are hereby sum.
moned aud required to answer the com.
plant of the plaintiff in the above entitled
action. which is filed in the Office of the
Judicial District in and for the County of
Brown and State of Minnesota, and to
serve copy of your answer to the said
complaint on the subscriber at their
Office in the City of New Ulm in said
county within twenty days after the
service of this summons upon you, exclu-
sive of the day of such service; and if you
fai! to answer the said complaint within
the time aforesaid, the plaintiff in this
action will apply to the Court for the relief
dem landed in the complaint.
Dated April, Is, 1912.
SOMSEN, DEMPSEY &c MUELLER,
Plaintiffs Attorneys, "
New Ulm. Minnesota.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
State of Minnesota,
County of Brown. !

Ninth Judicial District
Christian Filzen, ......... Plaintiff,
vs.
August Hamich, Anton Ramsauer,l
George Kramer, Jr John Scholl,
John Idner, Franz Baggeler.
Henry Casper, c. L. Blanchard
and John Schufenecker, also all
other persons unknown claiming
any right, title, estate interest
or lien, in the real estate de-
scribed in the complaint herein,
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
NEVADA FOR THE president
delegate to Chicago Instructed for
Taft,

Fallon. New. May 8.-Taft adberents
controlled the Republican state con.
ventlon and named six delegates in
structed to vote for the denomination
OF the president.
The Taft administration was en-.
dor'ed. The vote pledging the dele,
gates stood % to II.
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15

Minneapolis 4 St. Louis r. r.
NORTH BOUNl
New Ulm & St. Paul. lex. SUM- 5:15 q. m.
Twin Cities Passenger. 49,. lex. SUM- 2:06 p n
SOUTH BOUND.
New Ulm & St. Paul. lex. SUM- S:45 .. m.
Local Freight. 5000. ...... lex. SUM- 80 D N
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15

Johann Mayer. Adam Meyer I
Margaretha Mayer, John,
A man1 M Maye! Phiiinn G Ga9S.
Philip Cross, Hermann Bo
denstein. Peter Breith, Ger-i
man Land Association, a
corporation. Joseph Hitz and
Mrs. Joseph Hitz, his wife,
also all other persons un.
kn 1wn claiming any right,
title, estate. interest or lien,
in the real estate described in
the complaint herein,...........
Defendants
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
SUMMONS AND LIS PENDENS,

State of Minnesota, L.
County of Brown.
.". District Court
Nintl, Judicial Di strict.
Christian Filler. Plaintiff
New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1912-05-15
CLAIMS OF TAFT
and ROOSEVELT
Lists Of Delegates 10 Chicago
Widely Divergent.
MANY ALREADY ARE CHOSEN
Apparent Now That Actual Control Of
Convention Must Await Action
on Contests.
RIVAL CALCULATIONS.

+ + + + + + + $4,000
Atlanta Georgian. [volume] (Atlanta, Ga.) 1912-1939, 1912-08-21
KANSAS ELECTOR
TANCLE GRO VS.
Federal Court ForbidS Placing
of Roosevelt Men on Re-
publican Ticket.

TOPEKA. KANS., Aug. 21-The
tangle over the Roosevelt electors and
the status of the Republican party in
Kansas was made more confusing to-
day when copies of a restraining or
der, granted by Federal Judge Smith
Mcpherson at Red Oaks. Ia, were
served on state officials denying them
the right to put the Roosevelt electors
on the Republican ticket. The papers
were served on Governor Stubs. Sec
rotary of State . Sessions, Treasurer
Dudley and Auditor Davis.
The injunction was secured by w. d.
Bemuth and others who signed the pc
tition of the Roosevelt electors They
assert that they believed the electors
would be bound by the action of the
Chicago convention and if they were
not many Republicans in the state
would virtually be DISTINGUISHED.