The Washburn leader. [volume] (Washburn, McLean County, N.D.) 1890-1986, 1912-11-29

still claim what I have claimed-that
concocted the will. signed my uncle's
name t 1t and put in the names of
witnesses who had no existence"
Here was u mixed up affair. and no
mistake. A pair Of lovers were each
claiming to be guilty. and solely
guilty. of Il crime. Which vas the in.
nocent. which the guilty one? ] had
nothing by which to decide. l thought
Of the experts. Should l submit this
sew feature Of the q s to them:
What would It avail: A preponder-
ance Of their evidence had proved JEFF
ferson guilty. They could not be ex-
pected to sc back on their former evil
dence by declaring that Miss Went
worth committed the forgery. !
could get other experts who had not
yet been brought into the case. but ii
they declared that Miss Wentworth
had done the writing 1t would only
prove expert testimony to be worth
less.
Here | paused In my cogitations. for
l was struck with an idea. l might
produce Miss WentwOrth's confession
in court. 1t would probably be regard
ed a ruse to save her lover. But sup
pose l could get experts to testify that
her handwriting had in it the charac-
teristics Of the forged signature. |
could at least save my client The
same evening l acted on this thought.
and, Though l had difficulty in finding
even one expert who had not been
called III the case. he had as good re-
pute for skill in his profession a. any
Of the others. TO my surprise. he told
me there was no doubt that Miss
Wentworth vas the guilty party.
That settled my course for the fu-
ture. The next day when the cOurt
opened | produced the second confess
sion and the affidavit Of the expert in
c%hirograpby thai, in his opinion the
confessors had forged the signature to
the will In question
There was u great deal OF confusion
in what followed in court The legal
aspect Of the case had entirely chang
ed. Two different persons had con-
fessed to have written Il signature that
could only have been written by one.
After consultation with their client the
plaintiffs lawyers took the ground that
the second will was invalid because
there was a confession on the part Of
the beneficiary under it that he had
forged 1t. Therefore, the property go
ing to Anna Blake under the former
will. she had no interest in further
criminal prosecution. They asked for
an adjournment Of the court and pro-
posed to me that if my client would
sign away all claim to his uncle's prop
erty they would drop the prosecution
against him and so far as they were
concerned would not prosecute Miss
Wentworth.
l declined the proposition on the
ground that it was impossible to prove
either of the lovers guilty. But they.
feeling confident that the chancery
court would give their client the prop
erty under the earlier will, dropped the
matter. and jefferson went forth a free
man.
My own solution Of the problem in
vOlved in the two confessions was
that Jefferson. being disappointed in
inheriting the property. sisnited that
the marriage could not take place.
This threw in the WAY OF Miss Went
worth Il temptation that she could not
resist. She connected a later will. nut
her lover in order to saw her from the
consequences OF her crime when Grim
nal proceedings We're commenced con.
fessed himself guilty. Nevertheless !
was not certain as to this or anything
concerning the parties or the affair III
which they were concerned. That eli
guilty | did no, doubt. but this opinion
was rather based on the evidence than
on the bearing or appearance OF either
Of them. could not throw off all i'm
preston that Jefferson was a. fine fell
low and Miss Wentworth was a lovely
girl. And had not each attempted to
| relieve the other of the burden by a
confession?
The matter Of the inheritance was
still In the chaDcery court when one
day l received a letter from a a In
Australia. had that day received an
invitation t o the wedding of Arnold
Jefferson. and Dora Wentworth. l put
the letter in my pocket and said moth.
ing about it till l attended the wed
ding. which took place In a little
church with no attendants except my
self. Indeed. it had not been expected
that even ! would accept When the
clergyman who performed the cere-
mony came to the words with all my
worldly goods l thee endow" and the
groom had repeated them l called a
halt and produced the letter I had re-
ceived from Australia. It read as fol
lows:
Have seen In an American newspaper
reference to the case against Arnold JEFF
ferson. l was an intimate friend Of the
late William Jefferson n was one Of the
witnesses to 4 will he made q few weeks
before his death. 1 return to America
soon on business and will call upon you
not long after you receive this.
SILAS ORMSBY.
Never shall I forget the look that
passed between the bride and groom.
Zach had believed the other guilty of