The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1912-06-30

to the Oklahoma dole egat,on the Ciarl
boomers patted him on the back. lie
had become popular with them. When
the vote OF the Oklahoma delegation hac
been poled II was found that there had
been no change. Clark having ten votes
Wilson ten The delegation is bound
by the unit rule and IL IL split into two
forces. ten men being instructed for
Wilson and ten for Clark: 80 IL requires
sixteen votes. or q majority in each camp
for the unit rule to he effective.
When the fourteenth ballot had beer
tabulated it was found that Clark had
663. Wilson. 38l; Underwood. Ill Har.
mon. 20: Marshall. 80; Bryan q. and Foss
=. This was a gain of five votes for vii.
son. Il loss of "a votes for Underwood
and a loss of IA votes for Clark.
Bryan's influence.
As the delegates had not much oppoi .
tunity TO confer with their leaders on the
proposition put forward by Bryan In the
vote taking on the fifteenth ballot. unusual
interest was displayed when the count
Everybody was anxious TO know what
influence Bryan had There was Q shift
of three Wilson votes to Clark in Maine.
which brought whoop from Missouri.
Wilson lost another vote in Michigan,
Clark carrying it OF. Two of Under
but six of Montana's eight votes. which
have been solid for Clark right along,
scurried over to the Wilson camp. Will
son lost a vote in Ohio to Kern and Clarl,
Rico.
This ballot was taken with greater
speed than any Of the other fourteen
In the first place the galleries were as
anxious to know what was going to hap
pen as the delegates. although the an
nouncement OF Chairman James that
there is only few hours before Sunday
and We want to transact the business of
this convention y may have had some
effect. The result OF the ballot was:
II lark. 552; Wilson. 3621a; Underwood,
liOIs; Harmon. ~; Marshall, 80; Bryan, 2;
Foss. ,.
II the vote showed anything. Bryan had
not accomplished his purpose. nt any
rate for tho time being. Wilson gained a
vote and a half on the ballot. Clark losing
one vote and Underwood one-half vote
~ The quiet which prevailed while this
ba lot was taken gave way to great con-
fusion when the result was announced
Gum Shoe Bill Stone of Missouri Tom
TagSart of Indiana and Roger Sullivan
OF Illinois made trips through the middle
aisle to where Charles F. Murphy sat in
the New York delegation.
Wilson Men Not Pleased.
I, uos .,,;d.,. .h,. ,,., w;,. ...
var, nnt ,,iaasa,t Icy ~. p' pr',o n.h ,oioe
~ ,h., proa'';, ~" ..'. ln ~ al nPIeHI, r;.,
anu anu the Propoe'ion auSahceu oy nun
INA, he sn.lre New YORK dclegation
,rh..h ,rn Pr ,';n,. @ ia .he @
t;n;sms os pu'.. III t,em uahe, oy '"e Poi-
Wana Gov Nor.n,m ~ oS
u,,nha. Or Vau. Ia.,o,. " o5n,s Js ~ IN
MEN ,.,,, W ~" ce ,S;. a',. HAueis OF tne
cs,ber and S no H.. .ar nnn,,s, ~ ,h, d,o
4,a,as "i.tn Th "W;I w. e,s. .Fe ol .ns ata
Ervnn had sr,Lan ,,;,hn,. @ .I,r u,Srsa Una.
ana ,hnt NJ. NV, m''not' nov ''uar au'no',y
nrn,,s;,;,S ,"eS "''e 'o' party " h'o
Tbaw did no, o,,,o,o, ,h. l,,;.t hor.,.r
,bnt ,s % dsioao ao. ooat ,ah oie . e,. nGwersr'
other "andidaias and % wsi,;ne ror o'S INK nu. ~,
M;ah, sS p 3,.,np 20 ,ne miion @ ;,, coiurn n n
70 9e put in the position OF following the
ieanership OF Bryan
Mhiit 'ne ieaders OF all the candidates
ueciiieu 10 express any opinion. IL was
tne CONSENSUS that bryan had not helped
n!inseh ana the teeiing was th6t a" was
a'trhp'inH 10 dictate 20 the convention.
,neI" was oniy one 'iareup while the
~ ~Sih.tentn paIiot was pelnG TAKEN. 4 r
nu,'on Oh heIiogg got ruling from Chair
nan yah'es on the question oi whether
ne iuaho ueiegation snonld abide by
me me u,,i. rue. Aiter reaolhe the resolu-
non 9l tne STATE convention which elected
hs % ,,p, r,,is S, nma'Tnan I'm 1, lanes M said fha
i,Ii, :, ste cneSehce ;ii Oh tne uelegatlon toid
~ 'ha' ne oid nos nave chance OF nomina-
'iorl
inereupoh ieTah wanted 70 know why
naii man 'aihes iitd outteu m wnen ~
s inr .he HeeRauoh 10 decide what II
fn,ou"I ,n, uo. Snairnah James ignored the
a.e M ieaam hnu tne ei9ht votes OF loaho
rS '"s. ,',! IA oiCk LOT LARK.
my o,iy y.:, E.ner ulcloeiit OF tns Dalot
H.. .'c. "so" rh Ea"so one H0te from
rt.ssii y. oGi9; ,ne % mnai result pelhs
,,"I @ Dol Whsoi,; a 90. ,ohoerwoon
Tbhis h, shnna S,ar 30, ~, n,yM, , ross
1.ndnsS hS SHOWS ha ,na' am haa ost votean
M nue. nha'e ~oo j., ,'ad gai;ed 'Go. lhere was
"' '"''se III 'ie "iiSo'' ns"res'
Mae r
e ." 'oan"'
There was more trouble in the Idaho
delegation on the seyen;eeth ballot
After there had been many confabs Chair
man James announced that of the sixteen
delegates from Idaho only nine delegates
were present on the floor bur the nine
had a right 70 vote for the delegation. or
the nine delegates five We're for Kern and
four for Clark. So tho chairman split up
the vote of the delegation as follows:
Clark, 2; Kern 81; not voting. a.. The
result of the ballot was Clark, 545: Wilson,
ss2i,; Underwood llci,: Harmon" 20:
Marshall, 30; Bryan, l. Kern. A., The
distribution of the eight Idaho votes
which have been solid all along for Clark
resulted in net loss tor the Missourian OF
n Wilson and Underwood hald : hair o,s.,,