The enterprise. [volume] (Harlem, Mont.) 1899-1926, 1912-09-05
CONTINUED FROM LAST WkkN

/ CONTINUED FROM LAST Wees
attempting to add 1871 precinct men "a
the old committee was, Of course, be-
yond his power. The resolution au-
thorizing him to Gil vacancies. of
course, applied only to those places
which became vacant after they had
been filled and clearly did not apply to
131 new precincts. 1t could not in the
nature Of things apply to change
from the old system to complete new
system Of precincts created by the city
council, because If they were to be
filled the entire number of 331 new
precincts different from the old must
be filed. One system could not be
made into the other by mere addi.
tional appointment Of l3l committee
men. No lawyer will say that such
action by the committee thus constj-
tuted was legal Therefore the action
which the lawful committee Of $50 took
majority in the state convention was
the only one which could be recognized
as valid
CONTESTED DISTRICT DELE
GATES.
~ ALABAMA. 49,
Ninth District.
The Ninth Alabama contest turned
on the question whether the chairman
OF district committee had power to
Oil vacancies. whether committee.
man who had sent his resignation to
| take effect only in case he was not
present, being present. should be pre-
vented from acting as committeeman.
and. third. on the identity Of another
committeeman. The written resolu.
ton under which the right Of the
chairman to appoint to vacancies was
claimed showed on its face that the
specific authority was written in in
different writing and different colored
pencil between the lines. A number OF
affidavits were filed by committeeman
who were present when the resolution
was passed to show that the resolu-
ton contained no such authority. This
gave IlS0 W NuCSlIOu vi IdCl OpOu
which a very large majority Of both
the national committee and the com.
mittee on credentials held that the
lead pencil insertion was forgery.
that the chairman did not have the au.
thority therefore to appoint to the
vacancies, and therefore the action Of
his committee was not valid This
made 1t necessary to reject the contest.
ants. The committee decided the two
other issues of fact before them in
favor of the Taft contention. although
the first decision was conclusive.
ARKANSAS.
Fifth District.
In the Fifth Arkansas the question
/ was one Of the identity Of one faction
or the other as the Republican party.
This convention followed the example
Of the convention Of 1908 in holding
that what was known as the Redding
faction was not the Republican party.
/ that it was defunct organization and
! had only acquired life at the end Of
each four years for the purpose OF
| using 1t in the national convention.
| The contestants were therefore reject
Taft had been In active existence as
the Republican party, had nominated
a local ticket and had run q congress.
man.
CALIFORNIA.
Fourth District.
M IN +nH to
question: Under the state law the dele.
cation. two from each district. was
elected on a general ticket. in group
Of twenty-six. Each delegate might
either express his presidential prefer.
ence or agree to vote for the presiden.
uai candidate receiving the highest
number In the state. In the Fourth
district the two candidates from that
district on the Taft ticket expressed
preference for Taft, but did not
agree to vote for the candidates hav.
ing the highest state vote. These Taft
delegates In the Fourth district re-
ceived majority Of 200 more than
the Roosevelt delegates In that dis
trict The national call forbade any
law or the acceptance OF any law
which prevented the election Of dele
gates by districts. In other words. tho
call of the national convention was at
variance with the state law. The stats
law sought to enforce the state unit
rule and required the whole twenty.
six delegates to be voted for all over
the state. assigning two to each dis.
trict on the ticket to abide the state
wide election. while the Republican
national convention has insisted upon
the unit of the district since 1880 That
has been the party law. This conven-
ton recognized the party law and held
1t to be more binding than that of the
state law and allowed the two dele.
gates who had received in the Fourth
district vote larger than their two
opponents assigned to that district, to