Aberdeen herald. [volume] (Aberdeen, Chehalis County, W.T.) 1886-1917, 1912-10-28
STEEL TRUST BACK
OF TRUST PLAN
Charge Challenged, Gov Wilson
Returns with Prompt and
Convincing Answer.
COUNTRY WAITED FOR CLASH
Wondered If Il Was to Produce .
Parallel Of Parker Episode-More
Proof IL It 10 Wanted.

Parallel Of Parker Episode-More
Proof If It 10 Wanted.
When the country read on the morn
ing Of Oct. = the charge Of Woodrow
Wilson before his audiences in Color
ado that the steel trust is back of the
Roosevelt program Of trust regulation
and in the same papers Colonel ROose-
velt's demand for proof Of the asser-
ton it sat up and took notice. Would
this produce parallel Of the famous
episode of the 1904 campaign, when
the colonel called Judge Parker liar
for asserting (what has been so recent
ly proved that the corporations were
contributing to the Roosevelt cam
paign?
There was eager waiting for Cover
nor Wilson's answer. 1t came prompt
~ the next day in his speech at Kan
sas City. Concisely, convincingly and
.lispassionately Governor Wilson met
the Roosevelt challenge, and should
the controversy be pressed further the
Democratic candidate will give the bull
moose all he wants, for the corrob0ra-
ton whereof he spoke is abundant.
Wilson's Charge.
At Pueblo, the center Of the western
steel industry. Governor Wilson said:
evidence of what l am about to say
comes to me by way Of confederation
every day in forms that cannot ques-
ton. 1t Is a very interesting circum-
cto non thok tho TYuitoI Ct0toc Ctoo1 COR.
poration Is behind the third party pro-
gram with regard to the regulation of
the trusts.
Nov, I do not say that to prejudice
you. l am perfectly ready to admit
that the officers of that corporation
may think that the third party is the
best thing for the United States. That
is not my point. My point is that these
gentlemen have grown up in the atmos-
phere Of the things they themselves
have created and that the laws of the
United States so far have attempted to
destroy the things that they have Gre
ated and that they now want govern
ment which will perpetuate the things
they have created.
"YOu therefore have to choose now a
government such as the United States
Steel corporation thinks the United
States ought to have or government
such as we used to have before these
gentlemen succeeded in setting up pri-
vate monopoly"
Roossvelt's Challenge.
The same night ut Albany, N. Y,
Colonel Roosevelt upon reading reports
Of Governor Wilson's speech said:
"As far as know the statement has
not the slightest foundation in fact.
Mr.. Wilson has no business to make
such a statement unless he has the
proof, and If he has any proof de-
mand that he make 1t public imme-
diately. II he has not let him retract
bis statement as the only manly and
honorable thing to do"
Wilson's "Rstort Courteous"
The next night Governor Wilson
made this reply before the great au-
dience that greeted him in Kansas
City:
II understand from the newspaper
reports that Mr.. Roosevelt was dis
tressed by my suggestion the other day
that the United States Steel corpora
ton was back Of his plan for control
ling the trusts. He interpreted my re-
mark to mean that they were support
ing him with their money. was not
thinking about money.
II do not know whether they are
supporting him with their money or
not. 1t does not make any difference.
What meant was that they are sup
porting him with their thought, and
their thought Is not our thought.
meant. and say again, that the kind
of control which he proposes is the
kind Of control that the United States
Steel corporation wants.
II am perfectly willing to admit that
they think it is the best for the coun-
try. My point is that this is method
conceived from the point Of view Of the
very men who are to be controlled and
that that is just the wrong point of
view from which to conceive It.
IT Mr. Roosevelt is willing to have
Mr.. Perkins suggest how the corpora
lions ought to be regulated why will
he not be willing to take suggestions
from the same quarters as to the de-
tails Of the regulation? Mark you, la
dies and gentlemen, 1 am not discuss
ing individuals. know Mr.. George
Perkins. have no quarrel with any
thing except his judgment. He does
not look at these things in the way
men who do not wish to accustom their
minds to monopoly look at them"