The labor world. [volume] (Duluth, Minn.) 1896-current, 1912-07-27

+ / A04O yOus d1Ioi WnSU Lell f'fanKl1r
that nobody could accuse him Of eve,
having $4,000, and that he must
have gotten the money from Oar:
row?'" .. = =: z5:.
t''No." '.t. t.-. NV = EE.,s ~,
. G. G. Watt was under cross exa nj.
nation when court adjourned Tues.
day He :corroborated the testim on,
Of +. l.. Stineman, who said Frank.
lin told him that Samuel Gompers
was the man really wanted, and thai
barrow was to be prosecuted be.
cause he was friendly to the labo,
unions and would not turn against
Gompers. Ill.,. . %
The first part of that statement
is true. The last part is false" de.
clared Dominguez. p.
. Friend of Fredericks
Did, Franklin then say, Now,
boys, don't attack Captain Frederick.
in that thing. He is my friend.'"
Yes: -.
Did he also say mot to worr,
about him. that he would get out o;
it all right?'' - 49,. ::
"He did, 49,. s.-.,..., 49,.
Nov You say he said more than ]
have asked you. what was. it?''
Ford objected and was sustained
Dominguez was not cross-exam.
ined.: -. =. ~
A newspaper was produced by the
defense to show that Harry H. Jones
a reporter, who testified for barrow
last week. did. publish his interview
with FRANKLIN. wherein the later de.
ciared Darrow's innocence. Jones
took. the witness stand again and
Identified his article.
"Wednesday. morning District Attor.
ney Fredericks cross-examined Watt
Not On Darrow's Pay Roll.
Aren't you on Darrow's pay roll -
asked Fredericks.
I never got cents from him ir
my life"
You are a very great friend OF
barrow, aren't you?"
Not any more than Of my fellow
men in general
You call on him a great man,
times. don't you?"
Yes. he's in trouble
But he wasn't in trouble when yo,
first began calling on him ?"
mo, but he's a scholarly man. :
student, who stands high in the
world, and I call on him for that rea
son. i pick the best friends I can
ia call on you, Captain Fredericks
for, the same reason."~
Now that you have given us a lit.
tie lecture on philosophy, aren't yor
friendly with Darrow because Won,
views on philosophy. agree?'
Appel made an objection and wa,
sustained by Judge Hutton. On re.
direct. examination. Appelrs question,
We're blocked by the district attorney
and IN arguing his right to put them
Appel said =.
Fake and Frame On.
We have a right to show that this
whole thing was fake and a. frame.
up; that traps We're laid for Darroy
before he ever came to California
and that this bribery was only the
slmulatlon of a crime, in which. as
the witness says, Franklin and Fred.
erlcks We're confederates. -
In reply :Fredericks said:
I'VE; are glad to hear counsel -,
that the District attorney was trvine
10 orlne Jurymen to vote against hi.
side: Heretofore we were lookine
around for little brown man from
San Francisco and everywhere else. ,
The judge ruled for the prosecution
.betore excusing Watt Appel brought
out that he:>was formerly state
senator from Montana. Frederick
tried TO shake this by putting some
1ast questions about the actions Of
the Montana Legislature while Wat
was a. member, but failed
Fremont Older, editor Of the San
francisco" Bulletin. took the stand
He was questioned: by barrow:
Did you know John r. Harrinq.
ton 90 - -: ms
Yes. I met him shortly after yo,
came out here for the McNamars
CASE. ... ..
Ever have. business relations with
him?'.< h.
-: Yes. I furnished q $1,000 bali
when he. was :. arrested for con.
tempt for refusing to testify before
the grand jury.
Did you have any talk with him
at! that timer
No Corruption In Case.
Yes: he said that there had beer
no. corruption in the Mcnamara
case; that barrow gave everybody
to understand that there must be nr
violations of the law in any degree
and that he was called before the
grand jury because the prosecution
wanted to find out something about
the defense Of the McNamaras."
The prosecution entered technica,
objections to the testimony. A cues.
ton Of former evidence came up and
the reporters notes were called TO,
by Appel: 49,: :: -: :. ~
Older went on to declare that Har.
rlngton told him, in the Bulletin
Office, that he was trying to line ur
tne- witnesses for: Mcnamara de.
Tense in an orderly manner, but wa,
met on every hand by bribery of the
otner. side. ,.y4.r=s'~, 49, : .9's
Were you in Los Angeles, Novem.
Der 25?" asked barrow. -.
YES; ~ s4s.sr.. . -. - -.
Did you see Harrington at that
=. = Case Was Dismissed. *'5.s