Daily Kennebec journal. [microfilm reel] (Augusta, Me.) 1870-1975, 1912-12-23
STATE OF MAINE.

KENNEBEC. IS SUPREME Judi
C1AL COURT IN EQUITY -,
Arthur S. Moore vs.. S. Fl. Moore COM
pany.
Arthur S. Moore, of the city of New
York, in the County of New YORK, anu anu
state of New York complains aga ans.
duly organized under the laws OF the
state of Maine and having its legal To-
cation in Augusta, in the county Oh
FIRST: The plaintiff is the Treasurer
of said :. II. Moore Company.
SECOND; At meeting of the STOCK
holders of said corporation. legally called
and held at augusta on the S0th day OF
July, 1912, 1t was by a majority of the
issued and outstanding stock of SAID
Company voted, that after the payment
of all the debts of the Company, and
after the distribution of the assets re-
naming after the payment of said debts.
the Company should be dissolved; and
it was further voted, to authorize the
Directors to take such steps as they
might deem advisable to effect such dis
solution.
of said Corporation, legally called and
held at No. % William Street, in the City
of New York, on the End day Of Septem-
Der, 1872 the Directors adopted the fol-
lowing preambles and resolutions: RE
SOLVED, that Arthur 5. Moore be and
he hereby is authorized. empowered and
directed to proceed at once with the
liquidation or distribution of the assets
of the s. H. Moore Company, and to that
end that he be and he hereby is authorized,
empowered and directed to pay the debts
and outstanding obligations of the 5 II,
Moore Company as soon as practfeable.
and to distribute among the Stockholders
of the S. II. Moore Company all OF the
remaining assets of the said Company
over and above its debts and liabilities.
and that he as soon as possible take the
necessary steps for the dissolution OF the
EOTIPTu. That there are no existing
pofl 'prt
uted and no liabilities:
WHEREFORE THE ILAlNIlff
pRAYS: ca,,o,
may be dissolved and terminated,
>. That the plaintiff may have such
other and further relief as the case may
require.
g. That such notice of this bill may be
given to the defendant corporation as the
Court may see fit to order ,,,
ARTHUR S. MOORE.
Williamson Burleigh & Mclean,
Plaintiffs Solicitors.
State of New York.,
>-o.n,s OF lew ioth, S. -,
on this 4th day of December, 1872. be-
fore me then personally appeared Arthur
: Moore and made oath that he has
read the above bill and knows the con
tents thereof; and that the same Is true
tiers stated therein to be on iniormatloh
ia pelIvI, ana as 10 those matters ne
believes it to be true. 80 =, :,
sworn 10 belUfc iiit ttiiH ~ 49,
December, 1872. xx. = ,,oo,,,
(sEAI0 T. f. HqMPa4 ,5si
No. 145, State and County Of q \ New 9ork
that a hearing be had thereon at the
Court House in augusta in said DIS Gou aay
of Kennebec on Tuesday the fourth DAY
of February. 1913, at ten o'clock A. NJ
and that notice thereof be be given py "a g, of
his order thereon to the Clerk of said
Corporation thirty days at Least 6siefe
stract of the same three weeks success
~lv in the Daily Kenne b,,ca 3ogfn Ia be- be-
said Augusta, the last puphea1ion 70 re oe
zen aays at least before the SAID re-
turn day that all persons may a anen t se1
have. Why the prayer of said bill should
not be granted. r,,,>,.Sr,
Chief Justice of the Supreme Juolciai
Court.
A true copy, ra,.r,p f,,or,,
Attest: I. W. JoNE"' Sie'N'
dec23-20- ianh