Wood County reporter. [volume] (Grand Rapids [i.e. Wisconsin Rapids], Wis.) 1857-1923, 1912-12-05
CIRCUIT COURT
OPENED MONDAY

OPEhtD MUhDAI
The December term of Circuit Cour
opened Monday, Dec. ?. This &.
general term for Wood county and
a special term for the Seventh Judi
ciaI District
There are 80 cases n the calendar
Of which two are criminal, 28 Issues
Of fact for jury, Is Issues of fact for
court, 2 issues of law for court and
7 default cases There are also SO
applications for naturalization.
The Criminal cases are
l. The State of Wisconsin YER
sns A. L. Ridgman.
2. The State of Wisconsin YER
sus Emil Prust-
The Issues of Fact for Jury are:
l. E. J. Lindsey, ct al, co-partners
etc, VS.. F. w. Spencer
2. International Harvester Com
pany of America vs. F. w. Spencer.
3. Michael Drell, administrator,
etc, VS.. Connor Lumber & Land Co.
4. Frank Boucher VS.. Paul Gehrke
5. John c. Hansen ,as the Chippe-
wa Falls Const. Co. VS.. J. E. Vein
berg and F. G. Weinberg, co-partners
as the Weinberg ConSt. Co.
6. Alex Grace VS.. William Weiden,
ct al
7. The McCrum Howell Co. vs.. A.
L. Fontaine.
8. Fred Lehman, minor, by Gus
taVe Krasin, his guardian ad Iitem
VS.. The City of Mansfield, and Will
helmina Barr, ct al.
9. G. H. Munroe VS.. John McGirr.
10. George w. Baker VS.. City of
Grand Rapids.
Il. Margaret E. skeel Fish and
Robert Skeel VS.. Sherman w. Whittlt
sey.
u. George W. Koehler and Henry
Hiprichs, co-partners, etc. VS.. John
schmitt.
13. Gerhard M. Schmitz VS.. Min,
neapolis, St., Paul & Sault Ste. Ma
rie Ry. Co.
IA Sanitary Mattress and Ham
mock Co. vs.. Wausau Lumber Co.
IS r. Connor Co. VS.. Wisconsin
Central Ry Co., ct al
IS. w. E. Thomas Lumber Co. VS..
R. Connor Co.
19. F. w. Kruger and w. E. Whee
Ian, oo-partners VS.. R. NJ. Levin and
J, Levin.
20. Ed. Mahoney VS.. Green Bay
&Western Ry. Co.
21. George w. Baker VS.. City of
Grand Rapids.
%. Pauline Domke VS.. Daniel Ro-
gers.
%. Daniel Matner VS.. Gustave
Brown.
"a. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.,
of Hartford, Connecticut, National
Union Fire Insurance Co. VS.. Wiscon-
sin Central Ry. Co, Minneapolis st.
Paul and Sault Ste Maries Ry Co.
25. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.
of Hartford, Connecticut, VS.. Wiscon-
sin Central Ry Co., Minneapolis st.
Paul and Sault Ste Marie and R.
Connor Co.
06 E,;ra,,,or,e Ipc,,roroo ~ oF
Newark, N. J., German Alliance Insm
ance Co., German Fire Insurance Co.,
ct. al. VS.. Wisconsin Central Ry Co.
Minneapolis, ST. Paul and Sault Ste.
Marie Ry. Co.
q. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.,
of Hartford, Connecticut VS.. Wiscon-
sin Central Ry. Co., Minneapolis, St.
Paul and Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co.
28. Fidelity Phoenix Insurance Co.
of New York, as assignee of and sue
cessors to Phoenix Insurance Co. of
Brooklyn, N. Y. VS.. Wisconsin Cen
trail Ry. Co., Minneapolis, st. Paul.
and Sault Ste Marie Ry. Co
4oS utS O1 ctCL LOT court.
l. VIM. Rogers, sole trader, as
Grand Rapids Plumbing and Heating
Co, VS.. Lillian Fontaine and A. L.
Fontaine.
2. Lawrence Ward VS.. David Pill
lor and Anna NJ. PilIor.
), John Pleet VS. Chas. S. McNett.
l.
ert.
>. John Werner VS.. Anthony Dix
on and Chas. Heuer, ct al
6. Henry Ullrich VS., James c.
Trask, ct AL, James Mach, ct AL
7. OwOsso Carriage and Sleigh Co.
VS.. Geo. w. Purner, and First Ma
tional Bank of Grand Rapids, Wiscon
sin.
s. John Marx, ct al VS.. Frances
Wiltgen, ct al.
9. Anna Ress VS. Albert Ress.
To- In the matter of Wood Coun-
ty Drainage District.
IL Emma Schiller VS.. Emil Schil-
ler-
L. Melvin Kusmaul ct al VS..
Vesper Safety OleYis & MaIIeable
Iron Co., ct al.
13 Ferdinand Westheimer and sol
VS.. Lewis P. Kammerud and Lena
Kammerud, his wife
Issues Of Law for Court:
/ Town of Arpin VS. Minneapolis
st. Paul and Ste. Marie Ry. Co.
?. In the matter of Wood Coun-
ty Drainage District.
Default Gases:
L. Richard Roberts VS.. Thomas
Paxton, ct al.
2. Jacob Grimm vs. Sarah Grimm.
3. Florence Herbert VS.. Joseph
Herbert
II