The daily Gate City. [volume] (Keokuk, Iowa) 1855-1916, 1912-11-05
A HEAVY DOCKET
IN DISTRICT COURT
Almost One Hundred Cases Are Set
For Trial for the Next Three
Months in the District
Court.
BEGIN NEXT MONDAY
Judge II. Bank il. viii Preside at
November Term Of Court
Which Opens Next
Monday.

The remainder OF this week will be
devoted to probate business by Judge
hamilton and the equity and court
cases will be called on Monday. Nov.
18th, at 2 p. m. The criminal cases
will be called December 3rd, and the
civil jury cases will be tried after the
holidays.
The following is the assignment of
gases:
FIRST day: No. 1925, Beck vs.
Henkle; No. 1896, Younker VS.. Whit
tenmeyer; No. s427, Daily, admr, VS..
Jones'
Second day. No. S4S1, Berthold VS..
Hayes; No. 1886, Johnston VS.. Bur
rows, ct al; No. ss4l. in re-appeal
Cole
Third day: No. s642, in reappeal
Daniel; No. S643, in reappeal Hobbs;
No. Ss44. in reappeal Phillips.
Fourth day: NO. S645, in reappeal
Daniel; No. S671, Kelley vs.. G. B. &
@. R. r.; No. STAT, Keokuk National
bank VS.. Lee county.
Fifth day: No. 1923, Jones VS..
Knight: No. 1884, Illinois w. T. CO.
VS.. Miss. ". Tel. Co.; No COLL, Robin
son, ct al, ys. Johnson, ct al.
Sixth day: No. 9042, Casey VS.. Bent.
ley; No. 9O51, Singleton vs. McDon.
aid; No. sos6, Sanders VS.. Sanders.
Seventh day: No. 9149. MCGEE VS.
Erhardt, ct al; No 925s, Glassford vs.
Ballinger; NO. 9259, Benjamin VS.,
Benjamin.
Eighth day: No. 1920, Logan VS..
Bishop, ct al; No. 1928, Mills vs.. HUI
son, ct all No. 94O2, Kessler VS.. Bos.
ton Store.
Ninth day: No. 942S, Van Pappelen-
dam VS.. Thomas; No. 9461, Graham
VS.. Latta, ct al; No. 9462, Chichester
VS.. Harlan, ct al.
Tenth day: No. s475, Keokuk L. &
B Asso. VS.. Haage, ct al; No. 9494,
Baker VS.. Baker; No. .s497, Reed vs.
4 Reed.
Eleventh day: No. 1901, Morrisey
vs.. Tickle, ct al; No. 9517, McCrary,
ct al, vs. Lawson; No. 9532, Elliot vs.
Bowman, ct al.
Twelfth day: No. 1888, Hellenthal
VS. Hellenthal; No. s546, Penrod VS.
Penrod; No. 954S, johnson VS.. John.
son.
Thirteenth day: No. s57O, Richey
vs. Wirsig, ct al; No. 9572, Miss. r
P. Co. We. West, ct al; No. 6439, es
tate Morris Inman
Fourteenth day: No. 6931, estate
Gust Bergstrom; No 1854, estate Mary
Denham; No. 1915, estate Barney Nc
Gary No. 1908, estate Mary Denham
Criminal Causes.
Commencing December 8, 1912, al
2 p. m.
First day; NO. 1858. state VS.. Dunn;
No. 1861, state VS.. Sharp.
Second day: No. 1862, State VS.
Kurtz; No. 1868, State VS.. Snow, ct al
Third day: No. 3S43, State vs.. Cole
man; No. 1914, State vs.. Coleman;
No. 3s45. State VS.. Coleman.
Fourth day: No. 3S46, State vs. Rus
sell; No. 3s4s, state vs.. Schultz: No
SS49, State vs.. Cohen.
Fifth day. No 1858. State ys
Wheatley. ct al; No. 1854, State vs.
Wheatley, ct al; No. 1856, State VS.
Wheatley, ct al.
Civil Jury Cases.
First day: No. SIT, American E. T
Co. vs.. Miss. v. T. Co.; No. 1855, Miss
G. & l. Co. vs.. Green, ct al; No. S71s
! Richard Hanlon Mill'ny Co. VS.. Bald
win, ct al; No. s751, Daily Admr. vs.
Jones'
Second day: No. sS4S, Burnett VS.
A. 7. & s. F. Ry. Co; No. 1898, Daily
Admir-, VS.. spearman; No. 1905, Munds
VS., Haga; No. 9Oo7, Cts. Nut. Bank
VS.. Haffner, ct AL
Third day: No. 905e. Anderson vs
K. L. & B. Asso.; NO. 91o1, Hall
Admx, vs. IA. 7. & S. F. Ry. Co.; No
1920, Hampton vs.. Ashby, ct al; No
sl23, Bartlett VS.. Beck, ct al
Fourth day: No. 9l44. sterne vs.
Pont de Nemours & Co.; No. 1902
Lesser, ct al, VS.. sundeen, ct al No
1905, Fowler VS.. Tucker, Admr.; No
1923. Lucas VS. Keokul.
Fifth day: No. 9343, Mills vs.. Di