The Sentinel=record., 1912-04-03
ChANCERY COURT CASES ARE SET
JUDGE HENDERSON ISSUES PLAIN INSTRUCTIONS TO COUNSEL.
 oHs AND CLIENTS.
Must Be Ready to Give Attention to Litigation if the Court Is Expected
 to Give Cases Consideration.

There was never time in this ju. dicial district or this chancery court district when there was the business rules applied to court affairs that oD- tain now. As q result there is no muddled congestion of court dockets, but on the other hand litigation can have positive assurance of action on his case within any reasonable time. In keeping with the business rules which have made these conditions in our courts, Chancellor Judge Tender son yesterday issued the following authorized docket with the addenda, which makes it plain to clients and eonnsellors that they must be ready 10 take their cases up in court if they expect the court to give consid- eration to their cases.
 Cases set for April $. 1912, i'll the ehancery court: 32S0-C. T. Gotham, administrator
 ys Edward Fitzgerald. 3S79- Edward Morris ys. W. H.
 Hughes, ct al S40f-Valley Flaming Mill Compa.
 ny vs. l.. w. Rose. 3s47-A. A. Emerson and Company ys.
 w. H Boyer, ]. A. Smith, ct al 4i40-S. W. C. Smith vs. Hary Hoff-
 man hears. 4156-W. R. Mcdowell ys D. J Strat
 ton
 45O6--Bank of Commerce vs. J w
 Morrison ct al. 4322--George Rhodes and Son vs Els
 sex Valley Townsite and I'm
 provement company 442s- Mary r. Grubbs vs. g. ]. Nor
 ris. f50G-F, NJ Mahan Jr. vs. ]. R. and
 w. R. Long. 454S--William Fl. Clark ys. Harriet
 R. Stuart ct al 455S--Mary Shank vs. L. s. Buchanan 4554-Josie Shoults vs. Walter
 Shoults. 4564-W. II. Clark vs. Harry R. Stl
 art. administrator. 4570-Melissa Ashcraft vs. Thomas E
 Ashcraft 4609-A. L. Wallace vs. s. A. Rogers as2e-tC !!::rr:ssssiaii Elizabeth Reed Ys
 Frank B. Reed. 4649-J. T. Anderson Jr. vs. Fred D
 Ward, ct al. 4655- Frank D. Jeffreys vs Clara l.
 Jeffreys 4702-J M. Byrd, ex parte, confirma
 ton of title. 41lb-C. NJ Dodson vs. s. H. Tate
 ct al.
 4730-A. B. Gaines ct al vs. Anheus
 CT Bush Brewing company. 4f36-F. j. Green vs. F. J. Greer
 company. 474l-H. S. s. T. Guar. Co. ex., vs
 F Flemmings ct al. 477S-Charles D. Greaves. admins
 trator 47S2-Mary E. Brown vs. Frank ]
 Brown. 4s01-M. E. Ham vs. J. A. stalIeur
 ct al. 4S07--R. E l.. Maxey vs Eureka Bap
 tist church, ct al. 4S0S Christian Rowe vs. J. w. Green
 ct al 4sO9-Amanda Gibson ys. Will Glib
 son.
 4S22-George w. Nelson ys. Lila Nel
 son.
 4S26-F. D. Edmonds vs E Edmonds 4SS3-Susie B. Chambers ys Fannie
 Richardson 4S24-Susie B, Chambers vs. Jeff Cor.
 don ct al 4S35-Susie B. Chambers vs. Annie
 Jordan Morris. 4SS7-Susie B. Chambers vs. John w.
 White ct al 4S3S-S. 4. Logan vs Augusta Wright
 Cunningham ct al 2-Plunkett-Jarre Grocery compa.
 ny vs. George w. Wilson. 4S45-Alex Verdot vs. W. s. Sorrells
 ct al.
 The above cases will be called on Monday, April 8, at 10 am. and either tried set by agreement or dismissed for want of prosecution Any attor. ney unable to be here, must give no tice to the clerk of this court in writ. inS before the calling of the docket, else it will he considered by the court. that he has abandoned the case. The remainder of the docket will be call. ed on April l5. 1912. at 10 am. and disposed of in like manner. Dispositions iE statutory form will be required in all cases on final hear Ing. Defaults are only taken at roll call on Mondays.
 All evidence taken before the court on final hearing must be reduced to writing and filed with the papers be- fore a decison will be rendered. In divorce cases the plaintiff must appear before the court for oral ex. animation before a divorce will be granted, unless waived by the court on proper showing
 JETHRO r. HENDERSON,
 Chancellor,