Norwich bulletin., 1912-08-23
Windham, Conn, Aug. 19.
Vote for Taft-He is Safe.

Mir. Editor: received three very in-
 teresting letters Monday morning. The
 first one I opened was from The
 American Economist of 3S9 Broadway, New York, and contained clipping or
 one of my letters lately printed in The
 Bulletin. The second was from Home
 Market club of Boston, telling me tO
 keep it up. The third was from Nor wich and signed "A Good Republican,
 who will vote for Wilson" Now the
 first two naturally pleased me. The third was a lie on the face of it, for no good republican could vote for
 party that is doing what the Wilson party is now doing to destroy business confidence, break down our growing navy kill the last hope of a prosperous nation if they are returned to power. The three opinions of my poor little letters were vastly different, but other opinions on great economic questions are just as different, but the one great
 fact that opinion cannot change is the fact that the election of Wilson will be return to power of the tariff destroy ing, business disturbing element in the | democratic party that has never yet shown itself capable of managing the
 government of this great land. The
 miserable fiasco on the battleship question, where 90 members of the party mpelled-compelled do you mind-the remaining 100 odd to vote | for one ship. If 90 men can control over 200. what in the name of common sense can Woodrow Wilson, the self confessed single track mind man. do with both a congress and senate of rebel brigadiers on his hands? You
 may call such talk bloody shirt waving 1 if you will. l get right back to my subject, A Difference in Opinions
 Our senior senator, Frank B. Bran 1 degee, took a stand on the canal bill 1 that time will justify him in. Your 1 opinion may differ from him, but would 1t not be better if we had a few
 more Brandegees and 6 few less Jeff 1 Davis in the U. S. Senate?
 There is also a great difference of l opinion in regard to commerce court, steel tariff schedules and rates of tariff on sugar, but above all the | Americans are sure of one thing: that 1 is, that no matter for what reason he | does it, no matter who advises him in | his movements, the president of the l United States stands with his veto l pen ready to protect labor and capital i alike from the vicious assault of the | business destroying, New England l hating, American, non progressive rebel brigadier congress. Would the same cOnQluOnS prevail WlIn WOOQrOW l Wilson in MT. Taft's seat? Now look | here, MT Democrat, our opinions may differ, but is the pleasure of hurrahing l over the election of a democratic pres ] ident great enough to pay for a return i to conditions of 1893? Grover CIeve- l land. president of the United States. l a democrat that both you and I voted for, said in regard to the Wilson tariff i bill: Tt is perfidy and dishonor" The next move of Grover Cleveland was to allow the bill covered with perfidy and i dishonor to become a law by default. i when he could have exercised his power and right and vetoed it. If such l a great man as Grover Cleveland didn't have the courage to face his demo- l cratic houses, what would you expect Such single track minded man as Woodrow Wilson to do? There is "a difference in opinion. My opinion is he would be one of them and if you cannot join the army of progress and vote for Roosevelt, who is sure to win i if you do, why then do the next best thing and vote for w. H. Taft. He is at least safe, and on that score there is no difference of opinion
 c. B. MONTGOMERY. Packer, Conn.