The gazette-times. [volume] (Heppner, Or.) 1912-1925, 1912-08-08

changed his mind and called 4 liAeet-
ing of the committee for April II.
This committee called congressional
convention to be held on May 10. But
there was no publication Of the call,
which had to be thirty days before the
convention, until April 21. The Tart
convention seems therefore to have
been duly and regularly convened,
while the Roosevelt convention was
not. The Taft delegates were seated.
Tenth District.
In the Tenth district the decision
turned largely upon the bad faith with
which two members of the district
committee voted in the seating Of dele
gates and upon the bad faith with
which one of them used the proxy In
trusted to him. The Taft delegates In
this case bolted and left the hall and
Immediately In the same building or
ganized another convention which con-
sisted of delegates from six counties.
Proceedings were regularly held; per-
manent organization effected, the re-
| port of the committee on resolutions
adopted and delegates pledged to Taft
were elected. The undlsputed evidence
indicated that a fragrant attempt had
been made to deprive Taft Of this dis
trict, to which he was justly entitled.
The national committee sustained the
title Of the Taft delegates and alter
mates by a practically unanimous vote.
n:.A.;aA
In the Fourteenth district there were
fifteen counties In the district. When
the executive committee met at San
Antonio to make up the temporary roll
there were ten members Of the COM
mittee present whose right to act was
undlsputed, Of whom six were for Taft
and four for Roosevelt. There were
four other Roosevelt men present
whose right to vote was disputed and
who were clearly not entitled to repre-
sent their county at that meeting One
of them held the proxy of the commit
teeman from Kendall county, who was
dead. and the proxies from three other
ters and one by an assistant postmas-
ter, while under the election law Of
Texas no one who holds an Office of
profit or trust under the United States
shall act as member of an executive
committee either for the state or for
any district or county. The temporary !
roll was made up by Taft members,
having a clear majority without per
mltting these men to act under their |
proxies. There was a contest over the |
delegation from BeXar county. which |
contains the city of San Antonio. Full |
consideration was given to this contest,
but the testimony was overwhelming |
that Taft carried the county by n vote |
of four or five to one. On the proper
basis the total vote in the district con-
vention was sixty-seven, Of which the
number instructed or voting for Taft |
was thirty-seven and one-half, the
number voting or instructed for Roose-
welt twenty-eight and onehalf, not vot-
ing one. The Taft delegation was
therefore seated at Chicago.
CONCLUSION.
The purpose of this resume of the
contests In which there was any shad-
ow OF subs ance has been to inform
those who have not time or inclination
to read the longer and more detailed
account of them contained in the larger
pamphlet It Is not essential to make
MIR. Taft's title indisputable that all
men agree on every one of the issues !
raised. They were decided by the tri-
bunals which uniform party usage had
made the proper tribunals to decide
such contests. If those tribunals acted
In good faith mistaken judgment would
not invaidate their decisions. AS a
matter of fact, an examination of the
facts show that the tribunals were
right in every instance. There Is not
the slightest evidence that they were
moved by other than a mere desire to
reach right conclusion. On the other
hand. the action of the Roosevelt men
IN bringing 100 contests that they
promptly abandoned strongly tended
to show the lack Of good faith In the
OF all of them. Those who
support President Taft can well afford
to stand on the record In this case and
to asseverate without fear of success
ful contradiction that the delegates
whose seats were contested were as
fairly seated in this convention as In
any In the history of the party.