The Virginia enterprise. [volume] (Virginia, St. Louis County, Minn.) 1893-19??, 1912-08-02
sSflt- : a & n , g. ~ - q u = Z
.:. official 3 ! i :.
Publication Of
Proceedings
/, ? q. ''#:fs d. =. 5.IEE =
5 : The !;
City
Council
COUNCIL CHAMBER.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
| COUNCIL CHAMBER,
Virginia, MIMI, July 23rd, 1912.
Regular meeting Of the City Coun'
Gil of the City of Virginia, Mime.
sofa.
Council called to order by the
president.
Roll call.
| Present: Aldermen Heritage
Lundstrom, NOLAN, Ketola, McGhee
Coffey, Mr.. President-7.
Absent: Aldermen Harvey, KEEL.
ler-2.
Reading of minutes of previous
meeting.
Moved and supported that the min.
utes be approved as read.
Carried.
The clerk reported that the sum OF
1924 had been expended ON con-
struction of sanitary sewer through
certain portions of block IL, Ander-
sons Second Addition to Virginia.
and that unless assessment for ben
eft was made this sum would be
expended without reimbursement.
Moved and supported that the city
engineer be instructed to make as
sessment against the property ben
Gifted by construction Of this sewer
line and turn the figures for the
same into the city clerk.
Carried.
Moved and supported that the city
clerk be instructed to mail state
ments to the park board and school
board for steam roller services as
turned into him by the city time
keeper during the months of May
and June, 1912.
Carried.
Alderman NOLAN takes his seat in
the council.
By unanimous consent of the
council the ordinances relative to
slaughtered meats, fish, game and
fowl and licensing hawking and ped
ding in the city were laid over until
next regular meeting for third and
final reading.
Jereissati Brothers applied to the
council under date of July 18th,
1912, for license to sell their stock
| by auction for period of. thirty
days. The clerk then read to the
council a petition signed by property
owners, business men and merchants
asking that for reasons set forth in
the petition the license already is
sued be revoked.
Moved and supported that the ap-
plication of Jereissati Brothers to
auctioneer's license ror one month
at No. 222 Chestnut street be grant
ed.
Carried.
The Virginia Fairview Realty COM
pany petitioned the council for ex-
tension of water mains so as to serve
Blocks 8, 10, 13 and IA in Fairview
addition and the application was re-
ferred to the committee on light and
water.
Macleod & Smith applied for per-
nit for use of necessary portion of
Central avenue and Spruce street
during the construction of the new
library building on lots 6, Z, 8, 9 and
10, block 80, the sureties on the
$4,000 bond being A. F. Benson
and T. w. Lusk.
Moved and supported that the per-
NIT be granted, the bond accepted
and ordered filed after being approx
| ed by the mayor and city attorney.
Carried.
Boyle & Boyle, attorneys at Eve
leth, and acting for the Pickett Min
strel company, submitted a letter
asking for the return of a $1,000
! show license fee paid to the city
clerk on June 10th, 1912, for the
reason that the grounds on which the
| show was given was not in the city
limits and that the city had no right
to collect license fee therefor.
Moved and supported that the mat
ter be referred to the city attorney
| for adjustment.
Carried.
The meat inspector reporting for
the week ending July 23rd, 1912,
stated that he had condemned 81
pounds of fish belonging to Ole John
son, the hotels, bakeries, groceries
and meat markets being in good con-
dition.
The report was accepted and or
dered placed on file.
Health Officer Grove submitted
seven applications to sell milk and
cream under ordinance No. 80.
| Moved and supported the applica-
tons be granted and the city clerk
Instructed to notify the health Of
ficer to issue the proper certificates.
| Carried.
The owner of property at No. SO
South Central avenue desired to have
the city remove the rocks which were
placed on lots l6 and II, block 80,
Second Addition, while the city was
constructing a sanitary sewer
through this block and also fill up
the holes in the lots.
The matter was referred to the
committee on streets.
The clerk stated that this was the
date set for the opening and consid-
ering of proposals for construction
of sanitary sewer in certain portions
Of the North Side Addition and for
storm sewer in certain portions OF
Fifth street and stated to the coun-
Gil that no proposals had been left
with him.
Moved and supported that mas
much as no proposals had been sub
mitted for the construction of san
itary and storm sewer in portions
of the North Side and Rooney Ad'
ditions according to the advertise
ment and according to the city char
ter and the plans ana specifications