The Glenwood post., 1912-12-28

ssssAias ~. vss psssiAasA y =
u ssi1ssas baeass ~ hssasas ~
assA - shsU ~ ssaosaiey e Dsspsse.
~ sesAsss q - - es1isa, UAiaA
b - soseEial iaOas1sss q ~ e.
ssssas eAaeOs% - ~ asna1 - ess-
siAessA - y8 nose ~ iasns sassA
"The sviAssas II tAis seas sAsSs
that u Angus, lees, tAess res . ess-
tssvsrsy betuees ths lstesastiseal A.
seeisties sf bsiAUs aAA Strsetsral Isss
Worksrs ssd tAe A,.srieaa RsiAOs con-
pAsy over the opea ard eisssA shsP
question; that in said nosth Of A
gust 1905, tine International declared a
general strike against the American
Bridge company, and that this strike
mas never been settled.
''lf you find from the evidence that
in order to carry out the purpose OF tie
international, the defendants or two
or more Of them entered into q con
spirsey to destroy witk2dynamite ami
nitrog, ycerine the property Of the
American Bridge company and other
shop concerns, OF the structures which
they were erecting in various states
Of the Union, and if you find that such
conspiracy to destroy such property in
st.tuted ~ necessary step in the ac-
cOmpiishment of such destruction, the
unlawful transportation of dynam te
and nitrOgl lyeerine upon the vehicle of
common carriers engaged At the time in
the transportation Of passengers, from
place in one state to place or places
il another or other states of the United
Btstes, and if you further nnd that
sueh destruction Of property was ac
coaplisAs1 BY explosions of dynamite
ssd nitreglyceriDe in various placer
Throughout the United States, a.j that
ths dynamite aad aitsoglyceriae with
whase sssA szYissisos were produced
wses - . natter Of fact transported
from state to state in suit eases and
carrying eases upon the vehicle Of
common carriers engaged At the tine
in the carrying Of paseagers ~ sverrsd
tia you will b aathsrised to find that
. conspiracy was formed to transport
dynamite and nitroglyeerine unlawfully
- charged in tie Indictment
Calling atteatioa to the charges VI
illegal transportation the court stated.
"You ny find the defendants guilty
upoa all counts Of ths i.dietnsets upo.
which they ase nov spoa trial, il You
are satisfied beyond . rsass.abss doubt
that proofs Justify II u; yea nay fiad
the dste.assts guilty sPeG eay sas -
hsss e IL, sssess ~ ~ 6listneAe
s.A - ssisty spss seAses Yes nay
fisd asy aefssdaat ssilty or not
guilty, or yea ny fisd ore or mere
Of them guilty and the Others not
guilty. Before you can find any Of
the defendants guilty you must Be sat.
isfied Of his guilt in manner and form
- charged in some one Of the indict-
ments upon which they are on trial.
beyond . reasonable doubt"
OF NcManisal aad Edward Clark, cf
Cincinnati, both Of whom pleaded
guilty and testified for the governmen.
the court, said their testimony
"shoud be received with caution and
scrutinised with care" and added:
"The witness, William J. Burns,
while On the witness stand, detailed .
c0aversatiOa that he had with the de-
fenda.t, Hockin, in which he mad.
statements to Hockin about tAs defend-
ant Tveitmos, having been In prison
and having . prison record. Such state
ments made by Burns are not to be
considered by you in any way in deter
mining the guilt or innocense of the
defendant, Tveitmoe, as to the charges
n this Indictment
Judge Anderson concluded:
Carefully weigh all the evidence IN
the case and from it under the rules of
law which have given you determine
the guilt or innocence of the defeni-
ants. With you and not with the court
rests the responsibility of finding and
determining the facts. The views Of
the court on questions Of fact are not
controlling upon you. You have nothing
to do with the case except to deter
niHe the sisgIe qsestioa ef tie guilt
OF innAcense sf tAe defeadants. II you
should retara . verdict Of guilty, the
nea@alD sf punishnest 70 BE- inflicted
upeo the defendants i eonnitted to
the court" :. ~ ,ssFs',
fARAYnAs A111AL -
,T N n n o0RnP