Weekly journal-miner., 1912-11-13
GIVEN JUDGMENT FOR HER BACK
 SALARY
Mrs. Casperson Brought Suit Against Lubin
 Company.
(From Tuesday's Daily

Dtucilla Casperson for S2O and costs. m the court of Justice of the
 Peace Moore yesterday afternoon against the Lubin Company for sal ,ry due. The action was instituted Saturday and was brought against the Lubn Company and Romaine Field ing but as it developed at the trial that Fielding was an authorized agen, of the concern, the action as far as il affected him individually was dis. missed. 4.. T
 Mrs. Casperson alleged in her com plant that Fielding hired her under an oral contract that called for two weeks notice. and carfare from what. ever place the company chanccd io be, to her home in Texas. Up to inc latter part of last week she was connected with the local Lubin aggregation and thought she was to accompany them away from here. In fact she was notified to get her trunks in readiness and have them al ihc depot by two o'clock last Fri day The Casperson children. who have appeared in the pictures taken m this vicinity were gotten out of school and everything made ready for the journey. Later the trunks came back with word from the ex- pressman that they were not to 20. Mrs Casperson hunted up Fielding and then for the first time learned she was discharged, the alleged ground being that Fielding objected 10 the presence of her husband. whom it will be remembered 20, into irohse over drawing a cheek on Tucson bank in which he had no funds. Casperson. however, who was taken to the southern city was discharged when the matter came 10 hearing Mrs. Casperson remain cd loyal to her husband who came to Prescott with the Lubns as property man. Fielding at the lime Casperson got in trouble loudly aSSevcrated that the latter was never member of the company either here or in Tucson. Casperson as 'trtS he was in the employ of the company in both places and tha, his name on the payroll and his en- dorNements on salary cheeks drawn m his favor by Fielding will attest to the truth of his statements. lt looks as though Casperson is telling ,he truth for Fielding introduced him as member of the company here, although several days after ar rival in, Prescott, he was discharged.
 Mrs. Caspcrson asked for her sal ary s2n two weeks salary and her fare to- Texas in accordance with The terms of the contract. Fielding refused to pay and the suit was the result.
 Mrs Casperson asked for back sal yesterday told of the agreement and
 Fielding did not deny it., saying he could not remember that he had agreed to the notice and railroad fare clauses. The decision was de- layed couple of hours to enable Judge Moore to look up the conten- lion oi the attorney for the plain 'f, that the defendant company had not filed it's articles of incorporation m this state according to the re- TnIremcnts of law, and therefore had no standing in court He then rend- cred judgment for Mrs. Caspcrson, as noted above.
 The suit brought against Fielding ny the porter of the Del Monte 'aloon for $i.0O0 damages claimed Tor personal injuries to have been sustained through being run over by the Fielding automobile was dis missed in the Superior Court yes icrday it being reported that a com promise was effected for about hali pf ,h. .....<