The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1912-02-14
Second
Annual Exhibition
or
Paintings
ny THE
OLD MASTERS
AT the
v. C. Fischer Art Galleries
467 Fifth Avenue
Opposite the iubnc Library. New Yorp
Admission BY Card

ton Of rejecting on Judge Rosalsiv's nj -
! tlttide Mr. Carmodv and Mr. Whitman
| considered IL remarkable that tine Judge
should have based his vacation of the old
, plea Of guilty on consent of the COM
plninant" That was a suggestion aG-
vanccd bv Judge Parker hut which has
no standing in court. IN the opinion ot
Acknowledgement tarmodv or District
/ Attorney " hitman.
/ Brandt said the District Attorney.
"is In the custody ot the supreme Court.
not in the hands of Judge Rosa!ssy.
! van SOC tHIt the Judge has the power
to order Brandt before him. II he does
II will he my duty to appear. of course.
! Attorncy-(ienora afmodv Just before
, he lett for Albany ldsi night said pretty
plainly that he considered the Rosdlsky
= proceeding Wholly Ineffective. Mr. Car
inodv saya that the Judges orders will
! fall fiat. since he lacks jurisdiction entirely
| Inc NOR" they eSainin"d the !"gi.
tangle in which the BrarGt case l. knot'"d
! tn" more both Mr.. Whitman and MIR.
/ tarnody GSrecd that onlv Executive
Cl"r meg can apply IN th" case. Nlr.
| Whitman believing absolutely that
/ thnks at the same 'un" HAT hi- ease hIs
, passed out Of the hands OF the courts
/ 81 far as the mans Iteration IL concerned
and that ONLY n pardon @" commuta'ion
| would I've faultl"s> from ieEai standpoint
J Ii Justice Gerard should sustain the wrIt
/ Of hsOeHs corpus and direct a new trial
"A precedent would b" created that would
involve the District Attorneys office.
III Mr.. Wlitmau'- opinion. IN endless
resistance 20 similar attempts to E"t
freedom for convicted men.
FURTHER l&VESriGArIoN CERTAIN,
Whatnvcr happens, whether III. Gov
"rnor pardons Brandt as now seems prob
able. or u new trial il ordered hv Justice
! Gerard, which seemed doubtful last night.
there will hr an Investigator to dct"r-
min" il i'nprop"- Influences wor" used 10
send Brandt 10 In" p"nituntiary Tot ,hirty
years. u i known that the records OF the
. Polio" Department concerning the Wool
! drId - report on Brandt = "a .,"g"d criminal
recoro. disClos" that n"tcc,ive Woodbridge
wrote on Apcil ,, iDni. 10 Inspector Vic
Laughiin. th"n head of the let"'iiT" Ru-
r"au: In compliance with your order Ui
April | beg l,Iyc to submit In" re-
port CharEiuc ihat Brandt HAD been dlo-
charged ~ various employers for dis
honesty follows.
There L. also a Communication from
Howard : Cans. hen counsel for hor'l-
mer J.. SCh!'T. which - dated March ~,
lgI1 and addressed 10 Inspector No
LauEhiin Il contains substantially tus>
In reference to the NooidrIdr" report
The Grand Jury VIII ho asE"d to d..
t.rmina whether III" Nouliridg" report
was secured by Schif lawyers and thci
turned over to the Polic" Department f.,
v"rtiCatiCn Another communication
from AZ lawyer. dated March 81 iHn7
that is in the department til's contains
substantially tins pas-age'
My idea IL To nav" such report o'
! his Braudt's character made - vii
make necessary the imposition "f a Ions
, sentence
Il was learned late last uilh' tnat ther,
will likely bn lTprpgtluE- tct1-.