The labor world. [volume] (Duluth, Minn.) 1896-current, 1912-07-27

Did you afterWard tell Franklin
that nobody could accuse him Of ever
having $4,000, and that he must
have, gotten the money from Oar
row?'' %s.1
y. MOI e.
G. g. Watt was under cross-exam-
nation when court adjourned Tues.
day He Gcorroborated the testim ony
Of F. L. Stineman, who said Frank
lin told him that Samuel Gompers
was the man really wanted, and that
Darrow was to be prosecuted be-
cause he was friendly to the labor
unions and would not turn against
Gompers. =. Az. :
The first part of that statement
is true. The last part is FALSE de-
clared Dominique 80.
Friend of Fredericks
Did, Franklin then say, Now.
boys, don't attack Captain Frederciks
in that thing. He is my friend.'"
Yes. ~-.-
Did he also say j not to worry
about him. that he would get cut Of
It all right? 90 s. ID. -. ....
HE did,
Nov You say he said more than I
have asked You. what was it?''
Ford objected and was sustained
Donfnguez was not -cross-exam-
ined.
A newspaper. was produced by the
defense to show that Harry H. Jones.
reporter, who testified for barrow
last week. did. publish his interview
with Franklin, wherein the later de-
clared Darrow's innocence. Jones
took the witness stand again and
identified his article.
"wednesday. morning District Attor
ney Frederfcks cross-examined Watt.
Not On Darrow's Paw Roll. j..
Aren't You on Darrow's pay roll"
asked Fredericks.
never got cents from him in
my life"
You are Very great friend of
barrow, aren't you?'
MOT any more than Of my fellow
men in general"
You call on him great manv
times, don't you?"
Yes. he's in trouble"
But he wasn't in trouble when yo,,
flrst began calling on him."
no, but he's a scholarly man. =
student. who stands high in the
world, and I call on him for that rea-
son: 4 pick the best friends I can.
I'd call on you, Captain Fredericka
for the same reason"
NOW that you have given us a lit
tle< lecture on philosophy, aren't yo,,
friendly with barrow because your
views on philosophy. agree?''
Appel made an objection and was
sustained by Judge Hutton. On re-
olrect. examination. Appells questions
were blocked by the district ATTORNEY.
and In arguing his right to put them.
Appel said -
Fake and Frame On. $500
We have right to show that this
whole thing was fake and a Frame
up; mat traps were laid for barrow
De1ore he ever came to California,
and, that this bribery was onlv tho
stimulation Of crime, in which. as
the witness says, Franklin and Fred
erlcks We're confederates. -
In reply .F'redericks said:
I'VE are glad to hear counsel say
that the district attorney was trying
20 orlne Jurymen to vote against his
SIDE. Heretofore we were looking
around for a little brown man from
San Francisco and everywhere else. -
The judge ruled for the prosecution.
6elore excus1ng Watt Appel brought
out that he was formerly a state
senator from Montana. Fredericks
tried to shake this by putting some
1ast questions about the actions If
the Montana legislature while Watt
was a member, but failed
Fremont Older, editor of the San
francisco: Bulletin, took the stand.
he was questioned by barrow:
Did you know John r. Harrinr.
ton?'" -. LOU t"s
Yes. I met him shortly after Won
came out here for the Mcnamara
case:".. ..-.
him?.~ ~. "''
Yes: L furnished a $1,000 bail
when he was : arrested for con-
tempt for refusing. to testify before
the grand: jury"
Did you have any talk with him
at. that time?"
No Corruption In Case.
Yes: he said that there had been
no: corruption in the Mcnamara
case; that barrow gave everyday
to understand that there must be M
violations Of the law in any degree
and that he was called before the
grand jury because the prosecution
wanted to find: out something about
the defense Of the McNamaras." >
The prosecution entered technical
objections to the testimony. A cues
ton OF former evidence came up and
the reporters notes were called for
by Appel. ;~.tr&-.:s ~
Older went on to- declare that Har-
rlngton told him, in the Bulletin"
ohice, that he was trying, to line IN
the witnesses Sfor.the. Mcnamara de-
Tense in an orderly manner. but was
met on. every hand by bribery: of the
other side. =: .;ss.4.f.., . i - -,-
Were You in Los Angeles, Novem-
Der ESP asked Darrow. ~ +
Yes; - Esa.a - - =
:: Did you see Harrington at that
: J. . Case Was Dismissed. ,'.a