Little Falls herald. [volume] (Little Falls, Morrison County, Minn.) 1889-1950, 1912-03-08
IN DISTRICT
Grand :. Jury Completes
Work-Number Of Cases 4
Disposed Of 4

tlOn OF tno Jury caso0I -. ~ = (
Jacob POs,.h and Miss Della Brlc1
~ero appQintet deputies to the CLERK Of
court during the present term, Joh4g
Kerich appointed assistant janltora
and John Laut rman, w. s.. Gayl
Aug. <Fs9erman anu Frank Wirwitzskt
appointed deputy shefiffs.@ ~. -.y.:.
Monday, afternoon was devoted tf
arl anglng Of the 'urt calendar and I
large number 0f cases were conttnnodf
d few dismissed, and two additional
ones plaoed On the calendar; the firstIE
q " Jury case, r. 81. Wellcome va
Minnie Czech and the Bank Of Royal
ton and the other court cahe, Littl(
Falls Cooperative Company ". 4. Oa
Cases dismissed or settled weret
wilson; Abraham K. Miller vi
Hannah II. Miller; Henry Roos and
Mario l.. Rtos vs. Aug. Roos ana
Elenore Roos; A. Hirschman & Go,
w. Joa Fros1ich:. state vs. Chas.g1
Vanase State ~. Phil Moran; State
vs. Warren FarrO~ and Tn0maa
Hughes The remaining bank cases
we're passed up Sc"
Cases continued are :Elizabetb schu-
bert Va. John Schubert; Jos. Schutl
and Amelia .Schun Va N. p. Ry. Co..
Perry Foster W N. T. Ky. Co. /;
Victoria Jaskowvich vs. Theo. kosival; !;
Stanislaus Kozek Va N. P ny. Co. !;
Audro Kulesza vs. N. P Ky. 60. t3eo.
HrboDsky vs. John John Jenco: Albert
Argall W Alt. and Mary McGreRor
Wm. Z. Foster vs. Geo. s. Leo ct al: j..
g. Heudrlckson vs Morrison county !.
Eliza e. Cole vs N. p. Ky. Co.; Lena
NJ. Bruening " Anton BrueniBg; /;
Christina Hanson Bule Va Nels A.:
Swanson; Felix Rocheleau W Morrison
county; Carl Bolander W Morrison
county; Vim. G. Foster " w. ".
Howe, ct ii; A. d. Robins VI Jamee
Shipman; state W F. A. Liudberxh;
State W Felix Rocheleau; Royalton
Co-opreative c., W l. W. and A. G,
Bouck State - John Richter; state
VI John 6chaaner. lhe application Of
Anton bermel tor naturahxation
papers was also continued. ,->>.s
Brutscher, Olof Sodin. John Tetiva.
wore granteo netntsltx ton nepsas M g 81.
~ ~ 8ggsok sW.: -
zxpa I'm. i s,.sa : O. II i
csseo, esiSe 1p lof tftal Tsa1ay, ana
a1fhoaRhT co11sido1Ahle evilt6nae ::wl5
heaId Il 10 latter case. nth = ~
continued s -. ::
The jury csses ct tor this week arc {:
John G. Toeuyes W Louis Kuschel. l..
F.C o.opreativs Go: W Ludwig: :Drel-
lock aame 70 Frank Pedley; same vs.
3. "A. LAFond; Northlaud Motor Co.,
vs T. q. Berg Jos. q. 9ren VI: Frank
and Caroline arlttner; Simon Kasella
VS. Maier Bros; F. H. Mellman vs.
Minnie Geek and State Bank of Roy.
alton Searstock Land Co., vs. c. A.
Carlson and c. Anderson: Marianna
Koziol VS. Anthony Koziol; j. X.
Martin W Fred Schwanke. ct al ;
Antoria Backowski vs. John Velinskl !;
Elizabeth Kliber vs Theo. Kllber. ct
al First Natl. Bank of Minneapolis
vs. B. Y. McNairy John F. Egan W
John Wiiczek; G. Rosenmeier receiver,
State Bank OF Royaltou, vs. Henry
koos. Jr., John Lepinski, vs. jacob
Duscher School District No. III vs S3
Inc grand jury, on Tuesday re-
turned an Indictment against Fred
Bachman of Swanville for desertion q
wife and children on January ~ thb
last and he pleaded not guilty to thb
charge. Case was set for this term Of
court. On Wednesday morning thb
grand jury reported again to thb
j, court. Jos. Klein was excused that
morning from further service IN tt]b
grand jury.
The grand jury completed lts
deliberations yesterday afternoon af
about 3 O'Clock, after being il session
since Monday afternoon. Considerably
business was transacted. Recon-
mendations were made for repairlnk
different parts of the court house
! which included the installation of /
swinging door at the main entrance d
the court room to do away with the
! necessity Of door tender.
The case of Toenyes>vs Kuschel wss
tried Wednesday morning an actlop
involving the ownership Of about 1q
bushels Of oats. Louis Kuschel bas
leased some -. land from plaintiff i
brother, he to do the seeding and hat
| vestlng and % take half of the crop df
wheat and oats as his. share. BefoIe
tho crop was ripe, however, John, q.
Teenyes purchased the land from hiG
brother, and IN court testified that he
had purhased :kuschsl .: share of III
oats for $5 and his share Of the wheat.
Defendant on the: other ;, hald claims
to have purchased; plaintiH's; share d
the oats for $a5.s Both deals it Il
claimed took place at . certain meet
ing at R0yalton saloon before abo9t
the same witnesses. The jury brought
N verdict FOL. .S2v. 76. for the plain
till. = = 4
The suits brought by the Little Fails
COOPERATIVE company againat Lud Wig
Drellock and E.. A. La Fond for the II
coveEy on notes for $l05 and 500 ~
spectively, which they had given tor
stock in the concern. were settled. j! i!
Yesterday morning the jury returned
verdict, in favor OF plaintfff for
$125. Us In the case of Little Falls c.
tve!company vs Frank Pedley, q
elnilar case 60 the above, the face Of
the; note being - 41Ol Defendant
claimed that the. company had pros Z
iseo hln at the time he gave the !. note
that the dividends on the stock S oud
pay the note, but the court ruled TIM,