Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1912-05-03
In the Circuit Court for Montgomery county.
as a Court of Equity. No. 2812.

THE OBJECT of this suit is to have the
proceedings in Sheriff's sale made by
John W. Collier. Sheriff, to James H. Sa-
vile, the proceedings under the bill filed
for the sale of land for partition, in case
wherein James H. Saville and wife are
plaintiffs, and Lucretia Cropley and others
are defendants, and deed from James H.
Saville and wife to the plaintiff, and a
deed from Harriet c. Cropley to the plain
tiff reformed.
The Bill states that the plaintiff pur-
chased from Arthur Peter, Charles c. Tucker
and Charles w. Prettyman, trustees ap-
pointed in an equity cause pending in
this Court wherein James H. Saville and
Susan Saville, his wife, are plaintiffs,
and Lucretia Cropley, Charles B. Cropley
and Grace W. Cropley, his wife, are de-
PENDANTS, tract of land situate in Mont
gomery county. in the State of Mary
land, called "Carderock" and part of tract
of land called "Dowell's Discovery" con-
tanning thirty-seven (37) acres and TWEEN
ty-six (26) square perches and hereinafter
called the improved lot but by mistake
said trustees conveyed to him part of a
tract of land called "Carderock" and part
of tract of land called young Mans
Folly Resurveyed" containing thirty-seven
and one-eighth (37 1-8) acres Of land.
more or less, and hereinafter called the
unimproved lot.
That James H. Saville purchased his in
terest in said improved lot from John w.
Collier, Sheriff of Montgomery county, I'M
der executions issued against the lands of
Arthur B. Cropley. but that said Sheriff
described in his schedule and deed to said
William II. Saville the unimproved lot
That afterwards Harriet C. Cropley sold
her inchOate right of dover in said i'm
proved lot to the plaintiffs; but by mistake
conveyed the unimproved lot to the plaintiff.
That before the plaintiff purchased said
improved lot from said trustees, he pur-
chased the interest of said James H. Sa-
vile in said improved lot, but the said
James II. Saville and wife conveyed to the
plaintiff an undivided three seventh inter-
est in said unimproved lot.
That John X. Lang is trustee in bank
ruptcy for Charles B. Cropley.
That said Arthur Cropley and Harriet C.
Cropley. his wife: James II. Saville and
Susan Saville, his wife; Lucretia Cropley,
Charles B. CrOpley and Grace W. Cropley,
his wife, and John r. Lang, trustee In
bankruptcy for Charles B. Cropley and
Charles c. Tucker, all reside in Washington
City, in the District Of Columbia, and are
nonresidents Of the State of Maryland.
1t is thereupon the 23rd day of April,
1912, ordered by the Circuit Court for Mont
gomery County, in Equity, that the plaintiff
by causing copy Of this order to be in
serted in some newspaper published in
said Montgomery County, once in each of
four successive weeks before the 9th day
Of May, 1912. give notice to the said absent
defendants of the object and substance of
this bill, warning them to appear in this
Court in person or by solicitor, on or before
the 18th day of June next, to show cause.
if any they have. why decree ought not
to be passed as prayed.
JOHN l.. BRUNETT, Clerk
Circuit Court for Montgomery County.
True copy-Test:
JOHN L. BRUNETT, Clerk.
ROBERT b. PETER,
Solicitor for plaintiff.
apr 28-td