Bisbee daily review., 1912-10-18
JUDICIAL GRIND
 GOES ON DAILY
Divorce Actions Lead All Others in Superior Court at Tombstone and
 Debt Comes Next
COURT KEPT BUSY
(Oscar K. GollD

TOMBSTONE, Ariz., Oct. 17.-Tbs judicial grind in the halls of justice at Tom bstope continues daily, ana very often far into the night, owing to the volume of litigation which is occupying the attention of Superior Judge Fred Sutter. Cases continue to pile up each day, the majority of which are actions for debt and divorce, the latter pre-dominating throughout
 Much business was disposed of dur ing the past week. principal among which were the following matters:
 F. G. Anderson vs Josephine And erson. decree for divorce granted
 CTenard vs Caretto, submitted to the court and same taken under a6, visemen nt.
 The divorce case of McReynolds vs McReynolds, was transferred to FIHla county for trial.
 A decree of divorce vas granted in the case of Maurin vs. MauriiL
 Judgment was granted to the plain. tiff in the case of Cowan ys. Nichol son.
 Judgment to Defendant.
 In the case of H. l.. Johnson ys. Banning Vail, judgment was given to tho defendant
 The case of Berry vs. Crawford was set for trial on October 21st.
 In the famous water right case cT Frank Joeger, ct al-, ys Landers the court granted both sides until Noyem- Der 1st in which to nle briefs.
 The case of the City of Bisbee ys. A. J. Kisselberg, was ordered dis missed from the civil calendar.
 Ora E. Jones was granted a divorce from Minnie " Jones.
 Judgment was granted to the Bis bee-Naco water company against Geo. Staley for debt in the sum of S4,614.5S and costs amounting Co sS.65.
 In the case Of the Dicus Plumbing X Heating company vs. the Bisbee EN- tension Mining company, judgment was granted to the plaintiff in the sum of s7S6.05 and interest thereon.
 Judgment for Plaintiff.
 Judgment for plaintiff in case Of Frank Payla, execator, vs. Lec T.. Woolery and C. L. Cummings. in the sum of $1.723.9S.
 In the case of The Bar Boot Cattle. company vs. John P. Johnson, iudg- ment for plaintiff
 Maude Clark was granted a divorce from Walter Clark. together with the custody of the minor child and SIS a month for it's support.
 In the case O. George Mass vs. Norton Morgan Commercial company. the former judgment was vacated and the plaintiff was adiudged owner ofI stock in question, while defendant was entitled to dividend of LeadyiIle Min- ing company.
 Franose Evans was also awarded a decree of divorce from J. F. Evans, together with a division Of tue com. munity property in addition to an| attorneys fee Of S25O and costs of suit amounting to s7.05.
 Eva Incl also succeeded ir obtain ing a divorce from her husband Jo- seph, together with the custody of their minor child.
 A decree of divorce was also granted to Stella H. Sipes from William P. Sipes.
 Many New Cases.
 The following new cases have re- gently been enteTtd upon the civil docket in the office of the clerk or the superior souTt:
 Amos Marion vs. P. B. Soto, ct al an action for debt in the sum of s350 with interest thereon in the amount of S235 A writ of attachment was is- sued but no return has been received thus far.
 Hattie Berry has instituted suit for divorce against her husband, Emil Berry The former residing in Bisbez and the latter at Tombstone.
 Sarah Taylor also asks the court to