Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1912-04-26
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.
Minnie L. Mullican
VS..
George W. Mullican.
In the Circuit Court for Montgomery county
No. 2818 Equity.

THE OBJECT of this suit is to procure
a decree granting the plaintiff, Minnie f.
Mullican, divorce mensa ct thOrO from
her husband, George W. Mullican, the de-
PENDANT that the plaintiff may have the
guardianship and custody of their infant
childen, Spencer c. Mullican. Nettie X.
Mullican, Ralph Mullican and Agnes Multi
can; that the plaintiff may be declared to
be entitled to receive, by way of almony,
such an allowance out Of her husbands
estate as may be propOrtioned to his means
and station in life; and that, in the mean
time, the defendant may be required to
pay unto the plaintiff a reasonable sum for
her support and maintenance during the
tendency of this suit, and such sum or
sums of money as may enable the plain
tiff to employ counsel to prosecute this
suit and to defray the necessary costs and
| expenses thereof.
The Bill alleges in substance as follows ::
L. That the plaintiff is a resident of
Montgomery county, Maryland, and has
been all her life, and that the defendant
is a nonresident Of the State of Maryland,
now residing in the county Of Allen, in the
State of Indiana.
2. That the plaintiff and defendant were
married on April goth. 1898, by Rev. l.. l..
Lloyd, then minister of the NJ Z. Church
South at Gaithersburg, Maryland
3. That since their marriage. the plain
tiff has behaved herself as faithful, af-
| fectiOnate and chaste wife towards the
defendant, and that her entire conduct has
always been above reproach.
a. That four children have been born to
their marriage all Of whom are now living
with the plaintiff, tO-wit: Spencer C. Null
lican. aged Is years Nettie X. Mullican,
aged ii years Ralph Mullican, aged
years. and Agnes Mullican. aged years.
D. That the plaintiff and defendant lived
together after their marriage, IN M0nt8om-
cry county, Maryland, as man and wife
until May 30th, l9ll.
y. mat piaintlll ana defendant lived In
the same mouse from May 30th, l9ll, to
March zbtn, lJlz, out that during such
time they did not c0hablt as man and wife.
Z. mat defendant on March 2Bth, l3lZ,
without Just cause. abandoned and de-
serted plaintiff at Montgomery county,
Maryland, and took up his residence in
Allen county, Indiana.
3. That for years past the defendant has
treated plaintiff with great cruelty, harsh
ness and brutality at times striking and
beating her. and that little more than
year ago his conduct became so lntolerable
that she was Obliged TO decline further
cohabltation with him as wife to him.
8. That for some years prior to March
26th, 1912. defendant has terorized over
plaintiff, and by continuous course OF
bad conduct resulting in such Impairment
OF her health that II became impossible
ior ner 70 conhplt wlth MN .,
~. Inat ueichuaht ny contlhuous
COURSE OF cLuei ILeatIneht ., plalhtlIl; SUCH
as inSlnuatlng tnat plalhtlil was uhchaste
WIN olner men, that plaIhtnIs cniio,en
, ~ lIke tne clilldreh Vi 1uleL men tih'
Decanie llnposslDie ior p,aIn.li anu u1-
IenuanL 10 CONTINUE hlaritai reIat'ohs WIN
eacn oI,et .., + r.. ana
-. Ihat s9iletline III remuaIy, ioI1,
WINE plaIhtin was IN WEAK, nervous ana NY,
V ., Iaen .,.L anu physlGaI eonul1
t,on, ueiehuant, WIth great Mo'ence an am
,nieats, uiIea'cnihB 10 Dieah nel nech,
, uslnB pIolane, auus, t mn alu .n'G I
,anguage 70 net Ih caush' L noiu " her anu i
orns and hodu wore so,aIned ~ smch a.
tent that shc suffered from the resnlts
thereof for a week or more
10 That defendant IL seized and ma.
sessed If n IarSe arnoup, ~ real and NJ,