Omaha daily bee. (Omaha [Neb.]) 187?-1922, 1912-03-01
COMMISSION DECISION SOON

Continued from First Page.D
Green, and the mandamus suit. resulted.
The supreme court held that the real
marty at interest had received no legal
notice Of the intention Of the state to
cancel the lease.
Admiral wins Salt.
Gustav Lonsneoker against Edwin
Longnecker Is OF interest on account OF
the personality Of the characters. the
defendant being Edwin f.ongnecker. a
rear admiral on the retired list Of the
United states navy. who resides In
Pennsylvania. His brother. Gustav Long
recker sued him for ss.71 as due him
In a partnership deal. service being OBJ
tained here on account Of an Attachment
levied on reai estate owned by the
admiral In Lancaster County. II Is
alleged the plaintiff. who was a mining
engineer. was to furnish the experiences
and the admiral the money with which
20 20 into a mining venture, The ad-
iral put up some money and the scheme.
he alleges, was then abandoned as I'M
profitable. Later the brother alleges
he took It up again and put In con-
siderable amount OF his own money,
which was lost and he wants the ad'
miral 10 reimburse him on the strength
OF the arrangement that he was to
furnish the capital for ahe enterprise
The defense was that the agreement only
applied to the project which failed and
was abandoned and did not extend TO thu
revival OF the project without his con
sent. The admiral won in the lower
court and the supreme court sustain'
the verdict.
List of Opinions.
Following are the opinions
The j. X. Armsby company asains
Raymond Bros, Clarke county. or
motion for rehearing. motion overruled
Grsy AGAINST Chicago. st. Paul. Min
neapolls a Omaha Railroad company. Re
veI sed and remanded. Letton, j.
Mosslander against Armstrong. Judg
ment OF district court for t2.oo affirmed
Costs made in district court after rendi
ton Of Judgment, and costs In suprem
Sedswick, j., dissenting.
Thomas against Shea. Affirmed. Rose
J. Reese, c. j.. took no part.
Bayer against Bayer. Reversed and re
manded. eedgwick. J. Letton. j.. no
Ionsnecker asains, fongnecksr. Al
flrmed. Barnes. J.
Hin against Feeny. Affirmed. Barnes
]. Letton, j.. not sitting.
Peterson against Purinton. Affirmed
Fawcett, j.
Ths rarmers & Merchants Irrigatio
company against Hun. Affirmed. HAmer. J
Hans against American Transfer CON
pAny. Rose. J.
action dismissed at REALTORS costs, FaS
Haas against The Mutual Life Insui
ance company OF New York. Reverse
and remanded. Letton, J. Hamer, j.. NJ
sitting.
/ reheaFing:
} stOrz Brewing company against Har
sen Overruled
The ]. X. Armsby company again
Raymond-Bros.- Clarke company Owe
: Nsbraska Transfer company again
the Chicago, Burlington & quincy RAJ
D road company. Overruled.
: Hopper against Hopper. Overtuled-
Nemana Valley Drainage District y
4 against stocker. oyerruled
= Nemah Valley Drainage District No.
4 against Skeen- Overruled.
Nemah Valley Drainage District No.
; against Higgins. Oyerruled,
: Nemah Valley Drainage District No.
against Msrconnit. Cverruled-
Goff against Supreme Lodge OF toy
Achates- Motion OF appellant Ior rsnes :.
ing overruled. Motion Of interviewer Z
NJ Morehouse against Elkhorn DRAMA.
District. Overri1eo-