The Oskaloosa herald. (Oskaloosa, Mahaska County, Iowa) 1885-1919, 1912-02-08


Shall Develop the Resources Of the
Territory and Afford Protection to
settiers--Wouid Have Government
= Build and Own a Trunk Line Rail-
road-Water&ay Improvement
Conservation of the National Parks
Urges Commissions on the Cost
Of Living and Industrial Relations.
Washington, Feb. 2.-President Taft
sent the following message to con-
gress today:
To the Senate and House of Repre-
sentatives:
There is no branch Of the Federal
Jurisdiction which calls more impera-
lively. for immediate legislation than
that which concerns the public do
main, and especially the part Of that
domain which is In Alaska.
The progress under the reclamation
act has made clear the defects Of its
limitations, which should be remedied.
The rules governing the acquisition
Of homesteads, of land that Is not arid
or semi-arid, are not we'll adapted to
the perfecting of title to land made
arabic by government reclamation
work.
l concur with the Secretary OF the
Interior in his recommendation that.
after entry Is made upon land being
reclaimed, actual occupation as a
homestead of the same be not re-
quired until two years after entry,
but that cultivation of the same shall
be required, and that the present pro-
vision under which the land is to be
paid for in ten annual installments
shall be so modified as to allow a pat
ent issue for the land at the end OF
FIVE years cultivation and three
years occupation, with a reservation
of a government lien for the amount
Of the unpaid purchase money. This
leniency to the reclamation home
steader will relieve him from occupa-
tion at a time when the condition OF
the land makes It most burdensome
and difficult, and at the end Of five
years will furnish him with a title
upon which he can borrow money and
continue the improvement of his hold
ing.
I also concur in the recommends
tion Of the Secretary of the Interior
that all Of our public domain should
be classified and that each class
should be disposed of or administered
In the manner most appropriate to
that particular class.
Leasing Of Government Lands.
The chief change, however, which
ought to be made, and which I have
already recommended in previous
messages and communications to con,
gress, is that by which government
coal land and phosphate and other
mineral lands containing non-metal,
lferous minerals, shall be leased by
the government, with restrictions as
to size and time, resembling those
which now obtain throughout the
country between the owners in fee
and the lessees who work the mines
and In leases like those which have
been most successful in Australia
New Zealand, and Nova Scotia The
showing made by Investigations into
the successful working Of the leasing
system leaves no doubt as to It's wis.
dom and practical utility. Require
ments as to the working of the mine
during the term may be so framed
as to prevent any holding OF large
mining properties merely for specula,
ton, while the royalties may be made
sufficiently low, not unduly to In.
crease the cost of the coal mined, and
at the same time sufficient to furnish
e. reasonable income for the use OF
the public in the community where
the mining goes on. In Alaska, there
is no reason why a substantial income
should not thus be raised for such
public works as may be deemed
necessary or useful.
There is no difference between the
reasons which call for the application
Of the leasing system to the coal
lands still retained by the government
in the United States proper and those
which exist in Alaska
Would Build Trunk Line Railroad.
am not in favor of government
ownership where the same certainty
and efficiency OF service can be had
by private enterprise, but think the
conditions presented in Alaska are of
such character as to warrant the
government, for the purpose OF en-
couraging the development Of that
vast and remarkable territory, to
build and own a trunk line railroad,
which 1t can lease on terms which
may be varied and changed to meet
the growing prosperity and develop
ment Of the territory.
There is nothing In the history of
the United States which affords such
Just reason for criticism as the fail
IRE of the Federal government to ex,
tend the benefit of its fostering care
to the territory of Alaska. There was
time, Of course, when Alaska was
regarded as SO far removed into the
Arctic ocean as to make any develop.
ment Of 1t practically impossible, but
for years the facts have been known
to those who have been responsible
for its government, and everyone who
has given the subject the slightest
consideration has been aware of the
wonderful possibilities In its growth
and development II only capital wsrv