Arizona sentinel and Yuma weekly examiner., 1912-04-04
SUPERIOR COURT
 CALENDAR Is HEAVY
(Continued from Page One)

GlOriOSo Gold and copper Mining Co., a corporation, defendant, debt. P. H. Hayes, for plaintiff.
 H. F Williams, plaintiff, vs. w. E. Hurley, ct al., defendants, appeal from Justice Court Timmons & liar ris, for plaintiff; Peter T. Robert son, for defendants.
 Emma Hutton, plaintiff, vs. Clark r.. Hutton, divorce Wupperman & Wupperman, for plaintiff
 A. H. Kent, plaintiff, vs. B. L.. Meeden and J. w. Breedlove, de- fendants, to recover on judgment. P. T. Robertson, for plaintiff
 Clark S. Bishop, plaintiff, vs. F. D. Hamilton, ct al., defendants, suit for injunction. Thos. D. Molloy, for plaintiff
 J. w. Martin, plaintiff, vs. John Roberts, ct al, defendants, foreclosure of mortgage lien. Fred w. Morrison, for plaintiff.
 Charles Ed Eichelberger and M. Eichelberger, plaintiffs, vs. Arizona Success Mining Company and B. F. Hickman, defendants, debt $4,262.60. Timmons & Harris, for plaintiffs; P. T. Robertson, for defendants.
 Thomas A. Blakely and w. W. Will COX. plaintiffs, vs. Samuel M. Will son, Elsie Wilson, John Doe and Rich- ard Roe, defendants. application for injunction and restraining ..deI T D. Molloy, for ,,la.ntitfs, Wuppermar & Wupperman. f.: defendants.
 James Fender, plaintiff, vs Southern Pacific Company, defendant, damages sS00OO Thomas D. MoIloy. fur plain tiff; Frank Cox and Francis Hart. man, for defendant.
 H. Wupperman, plaintiff, vs. Joe Henry, defendant, debt $1OS.52 and in terest and cost of suit. Wupperlnan & Wupperman, for plaintiff; Thomas D. Molloy, for defendant
 l.. E. Karr and H. c. Hester, plain tiffs, vs. R. D. Breedlove and J. ~. Breedlove, defendants, suit on proTlis- ory note. Thomas D. Molloy, for the plaintiffs; Wupperman & Wupperman for defendants.
 R. D. Breedlove and J. w. Breed love, plaintiffs, vs. l.. E. Karr and Henry Hester, copartners, defendants $10,000 breech of contract and $1,0OO attorneys fees. Wupperman & Wup- perman for plaintiffs; Thomas D. l Molloy, for defendants.
 w. H. Pricket, plaintiff, vs. Yuma Electric & Water Company, a corpor- ation, defendant, damages $24210O l Wupperman & Wupperman, for plain tiff; P. T. Robertson, for defendant. |
 J. E. Baldwin, plaintiff, vs. w. A. | Hevener and Mrs. w. A. Hevener. defendants, appeal from Justice court | Wupperman & Wupperman, for plain tiff; Fred L. Ingraham, for defend ants.
 Merton c. Robertson and Aaron I. Robertson, copartners, plaintiffs, vs Felix Mayhew, defendant, debt s479 and interest. Wupperman & Wupper- man, for plaintiffs; c. H. Colman, for defendant
 w. Thomas, plaintiff, vs. J. W. Breedlove. John M. Speese and U. S. Smith, defendants, appeal from the Justice Court. Wupperman & fWup- perman, for plaintiff; P. T. Robert son, for defendants.
 Gus Livingston and Walter D. Ril- ey, plaintiffs, vs. The Big Eye Mining and Milling Company, a corporation: Amos Adams, William C. Prewitt, Louis w. Schooler, Harry c. John son, Perry O. Spittler and John L. Huffman, defendants, suit to recover | two-thirds interest in and to the Big Eye mining claim. E. s. Ives, for plaintiffs; P. T. Robertson, for de fendants.
 Jeptha Crouch and George Crouch plaintiffs, vs. Charlotte L. Rose, and D. c. Rose, defendants, debt. Thos. D. Molloy, for plaintiffs.
 Cleora E. Norton, plaintiff, vs. Fred V. Norton, defendant, divorce. Thos D. Molloy, for plaintiff.
 Fidelity Title Guaranty Company, plaintiff, vs Ottilie s. Klink, and the unknown heirs of Ottilie S. Klink, deceased, defendants, suit to quiet title. Thomas D. Molloy, for plain tiff; P. T. Robertson, for defendant.
 Alberta Luchini, plaintiff, vs John Luchini, defendant, divorce. Fred L. Ingraham, for plaintiff.
 Marie Fieber, plaintiff, vs. Constan-