The evening world. [volume] (New York, N.Y.) 1887-1931, 1912-06-10

primary reeulreasatD does not ceafofm
with the princlpees unAsr whicA the
National Committee acta II 10 . Ques-
tioa OF whether We viii abandon the
principle Of eisctinG delegates BY dis
tricts established In 1850 and return
te the principle of choosing them by
etate units"
heMEv Raises A STORM IN THE
COMMITTEE.
Mr.. Ilensy Sroke Into the committee
proceedings 10 say ne had heard that
there vac . movement on foot to
disfranchiss ell the delegates from the
sovereign state Of California n thoss
votes were needed"
Members Objected 10 M. Heney's re-
marie and demanded thsA he reseriss
himself to argument of the case.
"iIe lie not out of order" shouted
gsnseor Norah.
He 10 out Of order.- retorted Chair
man Rosewater.
Senator Borah declared that n NJ.
Hency were not allowed to proceed some
members OF the committee would do the
necessary talking.
las understand II, Senator" said Mr..
Hcney. again srisins. III ccnhnc my
self to Arguments that do not offend
any members Of the committee I am IN
order"
Chairman Rosswater's Gsvsi loudly
raped for order.
"rhe gentleman SHOULD not he allowed
70 come In here and Insult the committee
on the strength u something he has
seen In the newspapers" declared
Thcmas n. Devine Of Colorado. IAN
tho honesty 10 not on that s,tie." he
ADDED. shaking his nst az Senator
Borah.
We'll. all the honesty 10 not o. your
side" retortsd Borah.
Chairman Bosewatsr askcd Sergeant
alarms Stone TO escort the Roosevelt
esd Taft csntestants outside while the
committee Secsdsd.
On the rel cell the California case
WAS pcstooasd antn "Wednesday the
vote bsiag . 10 ~
The negative votes were those OF
Knight. California; Bonah. Idaho: Bur-
nam. Kentucky: Wight. Louisiana: kel-
iogg. Minnesota: Littauer Uor Flanisan
u NsvaAa): Ward. Nsv York: Capers.
south Carolina: fhorson, South DAKOTA;
Lyon. Tsnas: Loose. Utah: Rogers. Wis
consip. end Mccoy Of the Philippines
Then the committee took up tho con-
test over the fsur Indiana delsgates-at-
large.
The entire Indiana situatios 90 far -
the deiexates-at-iarse are concerned
hinged on tho allegation OF fraud and
corruption. Indianapolis was selected a.
the crux OF the case. Its Representations
In the State Convention that elected
Harry o. New. Charles W. FAIRBANKS.
James E. Wasaa AID Joseph u. Oliver
dslesa;es-s.-larg numbered Ia. or
these the majority were Taft mon. The
Roosevelt CONTESTANTS charged there vas
rspest!ng nj the polls.
They claimed that they were denied
reprcsen .ation ~ the ward primaries:
that ballots were not counted At all In
many Instances. but that false figures
were arrived at by the election boards;
that bands OF negro repeaiers were hur.
fl1d from polling place 70 poii.ng place
10 vote for the Tar, delegation. while
strong arm" methods we're In force u
many instances Because OF th,s sne
ss"ssA".s' n'"eH o. "e's'Iake' H"~,n
As' ~" H~has sno She"s ~
Campbell. demanded that they be
ssatsd.
Ch%H6ES OF FRAUD DENIED
EY TAFT MEN.
An these charges we're denied by the
Taft n~n Who produced evidence to
show that the primaries were properly
conducted. They infis;ed thors was mo
fraud.
Hosai:ilss were renewed while Horace
q. Stliwsil O! Anderson was making an
argument for the Roosevelt contt"tsn's
from lh''ina. AR. s'InWs.'' r'.a'hA
~
.o"a'hs NV" te w" N"''
se Tue ire OF we IL" 'o''s''
as you ne sA'o' =" s'op ,"e
ues" 81 your Steam rensr an' sVe
49, case taf ""A'anrsuon'
ms AS" re'o'rea 10 eheAt'hx M the
oseison from the eouthsfn delegate
cases ahd asden; your already
wsaHensd candidate cannot sanh tur-