The Penn's Grove record., 1912-11-01
cluded an income tax provision in the
Wilson law of 1904 Whop thic prn.

Wilson law of 1894. When this pro-
by the supreme court by a majority
of one the Democratic party renewed
The fight and has commended for the
income tax in three national cam
paigns. In 1908 the Democratic plat
form demanded the submission of an
amendment specifically authorizing an
income tax-the very amendment now
before the states for ratification.
Mr.. Roosevelt's candidate, Mr. Taft.
declared during the campaign that an
amendment was not necessary, and
MI. Roosevelt never made any argu-
ment in favor of the amendment or in
favor Of the principle embodied in it.
The amendment has now been ratified
by thirty-four states; but, sc far as l
know, Mr.. Roosevelt has never made a
speech in favor of it's ratification nor.
since the submission Of the amend
ment, made a speech urging an income
lax as a part Of u fiscal system. 1t
would not require any great stretch of
generosity on his part to credit the
Democratic party with priority in the
advocacy Of this reform.
Not Always For Railroad Regulation.
Mr.. Roosevelt is nov an advocate of
railroad regulation. When did he COM
mence? The Democratic party in its
platforms of 1896. 1900 and 1904 de-
manded an extension of the powers of
the interstate commerce commission.
Up to 1904 Mr.. Roosevelt never discuss
ed the subject of railroad regulation Of
ficially or in public speech, so far as l
have been able to find. Although NOM
mated without opposition in the con
vention of 1904, his platform contained
no promise of railroad regulation. By
its attitude on the railroad question
the Democratic party alienated the sup
port of those railway officials who
counted themselves Democrats. and
MI. Roosevelt. both in 1900. when he
was a candidate for vice president. and
In 1904, when he was a candidate for
president. had the benefit of the sup
port of those eX-DemocratS. It was in
1904 that he wrote his famous letter
to Mr.. Hartman and in tie state of
New York nrofited by The campaign
fund that Mr.. Hartman raised.
When after 1904 Mr.. Roosevelt took
up the subject of railroad regulation
he found more hearty support among
the Democrats in the senate and house
than among the Republicans. so that
nc has reason m know that +Io no~o
ocratic party has for Il long time plant
ed itself boldly upon the peoples side
on the subject of railroad regulation.
Under the circumstances we might
expect some complimentary reference
to our party's attitude instead of
a~nathemas.
r. RS Complete SomersauIt.
On the subject of publicity as to
campaign contributions he has not only
adopted the Democratic position, but
he has been compelled to turf a com
piete somersault in order to do so. In
1908 the Democratic platform demand
ed the publication before election of
the names of individual contributors
and the amounts contributed. MI.
Roosevelt at that time Endorsed Mr..
Taft's contention that the publication
should be deferred until after the cleo
ton, and eve went so far as to give
reasons for believing that it would be
improper to make the publication be-
fore the election. Two years later he
declared in favor of publicity before
and after the election, landing on the
Democratic side shortly before the law
was enacted carrying out the Demo
cratic platform on this subject. Here,
surely, he ought to praise the Demo
cratic party for the pioneer work it
has done in purifying politics.
Here are a few of the things which
bear the Democratic brand, and with
all of his experience on the plains he
will not be able to work the brand
over so as to make it look like '"T. R."