The Prince George's enquirer and southern Maryland advertiser. (Upper Marlborough, Md.) 1882-1925, 1912-03-08

Equity No, 1858
IlHE object of this suit is to procure
Il a decree for the sale of certain
tracts of land situated in Brandywine
district, Prince Georges County, State
of Maryland. and aggregating One
hundred and ninety one Q91) acres Of
land, more OF less, of which tracts Of
land the said Complainant Rufus
Edmund Rawlings, and the Defendants
Missouri Henrietta Garner, Rex Daniel
Rawlings, Hattie Webster, Harriet
Davis and Elizabeth Davis, are seized
and possessed as tenants IN common.
The bill states that under the last will
and testament of CERTAIN Daniel
Garner, q certified copy of which last
will and testament is filed with the Bill
marked Complainants Exhibit No. l,
said tracts of land containing 1S1 acres,
more or less, were devised unto a GER
tain Harriet Hyde and Elizabeth Garner,
share and share alike. That the said
Harriet and Elizabeth were sisters, and
that the said Elizabeth, died, unmarried
and intestate, in Prince Georges
County aforesaid about II years ago,
and that the said Harriet Hyde, died a
widow, and intestate. in said County
on or about January 30th., 1912.
That the following named persons
are sole heirs at law of the said Eliza
beth Garner and Harriet Hyde, viz
az A nephew, the Complainant Rufus
Edmund Rawlings, whose wife is the
Complainant Julia c Rawlings.
al A niece, Missouri Henrietta
Garner, widow, one of the Defendants.
ho nf
Daniel Rawlings, widower.
That the Complainant Rufus Edmund
Rawlings. and the Defendants Rex
ia Garner are brothers and sister and
own together an undivided one-third
interest in said property:
a. A niece, the Defendant Hattie
Webster, widow. That the said De-
PENDANT Hattie Webster owns an un-
divided one-third interest in said
property.
(5) A niece, the Defendant Harriet
Davis, unmarried.
(6.) A niece the Defendant Elizabeth
Davis, unmarried. That the Defendants
Harriet Davis and Elizabeth Davis, are
sisters and own together an undivided
interest in said property.
That all of the parties both Com
plainant and Defendant are adults and
al reside in Prince Georges County,
aforesaid except the Defendants Harriet
Davis and Elizabeth Davis who reside
in the District of Columbia. That the
said real estate above mentioned is not
susceptible of advantageous partitio
any division in KIND without great loss
and injury to the parties interested
therein, and that it would be far more
TO the interest of said parties Complai-
nant and Defendant to have said real
estate sold under decree of Court and
the proceeds arising therefrom TO be
divided amongst The respective parties
in accordance with their respective
interests therein. The Bill also con-
tains prayer for general relief.
1t is thereon ordered on this 9Th day
If March, 1912, by the Circuit Court
Tor Prince Georges County. in Equity,
hat the Compliments by causing
,1py of this order to be published in
'ome weekly newspaper in Prince
Georges County, aforesaid once in each
# four successive weeks before the 9th
lay of April, 1912. give notice to the
bsent Defendants, Harriet Davis and |
elizabeth Davis, to be and appear in
bis Court on or before the 23rd day |
f April, 1912, either in person or by |
olicitor, to show cause if any they
ave why a decree ought not to be
assed as prayed.
RICHARD N. RYON,
Clerk of the Circuit Court for Prince
eorge's County.
rue Copy Test
SAT RICHARD N RYON, clerk.