Bisbee daily review., 1912-06-29
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF cocHIsE, STATE
 OF ARIZONA

SHERIFF'S SALE NO. 60l9. BANK OF BISBEE,
 A corporation,
 PlaintiT,
 Vs.
 JACOB PIRRUNG.,
 Defendant.
 Under and by virtue of a decree of foreclosure. and an order Of sale is sued out Of the Superior Court of the County of Cochise, State of Arizona, on the 7th day of June. 1912, in the above entitled action, wherein The Bank of Bisbee, Q corporation, ths above named plaintiff, obtained a judg- mCnt and decree against Jacob PiT- rung, defendant, on the Ist day of June 1912, for the sum of Seven Thousand EiEht Hundred Seven ty-Two and 93-l00 (s7ST2.93) Dollars, lawful money of the United States, together with his costs of suits, taxed at Fourteen Dollars and Sixty Cents (S1iG0). besides interest, fur. tber costs and accruipg costs, I am commanded to sell that certain prop. erty described as follows:
 The surface and forty (40) feet beneath the surface of Block Mum Der One Q). Lots number Twen- ty-two (22l and Twenty-three C23), both in Block Two (2), and the South Half of Block Number Three (3) of the Guard lode mining claim, situated in the Warren Mining District, County of Cochise, State of Arizona, ac cording to the map dividing the surface of said Guard" claim into town lots, now on file in the office of the County Recorder of said Cochise County.
 And if the moneys ariCing from the sale of the above described property shall be insufficient to pay the amount of the judgment aforesaid, together with the interest, costs and accTuing costs as aforesaid, l am directed by said decree and order of sale. to i'm mediately sell all that certain real estate, premises and property. togeth- CT with the appurtenances thereunto belonging, situate in the Warren Min ing District, Coehise County, State of Arizona, and described as follows, to- wit:
 An undivided one half interest in the surface to a depth of forty (40) feet Of lot 2 in Block ]. on the Surplus" mining claim, ac- cording to the map dividing the surface of said Surplus" claim into town lots now on file in the office Of the County Recorder of said Cochise County.
 An undivided one half interest in the surface to a depth of forty (40) feet of lot q. in Block 3, on the Surplus mining claim, according 10 the map dividing the surface of said Surplus" claim into town lots, now on file in the
 pfiicc of the County Recorder of
 said Cochisa County. The surface, to a depth of for ty (49) feet, of lots 21, 22. 23 and 2i in Block 2, of the Guard
 mining claim, according to the map dividing the surface of said Guard claim into town lots, now on file in the office of said Coun- ty Recorder.
 The surface to a depth of forty (40) feet of lots 29 and 90, in
 Block 1, of the Guard mining claim. according to the map di-
 viding said Guard" claim into tOiof AoN Ou A4tS III tAC OfslCt Ol said County Recorder. The surface to a depth of forty (f0) feet. of lots 1. 2. and 1, in Block 5, of the Guard" mining claim, according to the map diyid-
 ing the surface of said Guard" claim into town lots. as aforesaid.
 An undivided one half interest in the surface to depth of forty
 (40) feet, of lots Is and IF, in
 Block G.. Of the Guard mining claim. according to the said map dividing the surface / of said Guard mining claim. according to the said map dividing the surface of said Guard" claim into lots, as aforesaid.
 Also the following mining claims. located in said Warren Mining Dis trict. the notices of location of which, as hereinafter referred to. are rel corded in Records of Mines, in the of flee ci the County Recorder of O.