The evening world., 1912-09-06

lawyer tried to get the admission from
waldo that the conduct OF his depart
msnt, especially in reference TO his or
dsrp relative to the suppression Of vice.
was along the lines OF the Mayors
wsal-known beliefs In outward order
and decency."
Commissioner waldo steadfastly re-
fused 20 admit that he know of M"
MAYORS we'll known declaration on this
subject, or that his Office was gov
erued by the convictions OF City Hall.
The Mayor was on trial. not Hayes,
was ths general comment at Head
quarters.
The FIRST fght for the defense was
pinned upon the fact that Douglas r.
Mckay sat as trial commissioner. the
same ,ssue upon which the trial was
hung up last week After vainiy trying
to force Thomas u. Thatcher. Hayes's
oounsei, to reveal wherein Mr.. Mckay
would DO an important witness for the
defense, Assistant Corporation Counsel
Terence Farley advised Mr.. Mckay
that there was no legal evidence OF his
disqualification and that he could pro-
coed.
~
Issue OF waldos act Of yesterday.
se,o TINS" FRIEND EARLY ON
HAND TO TESTIFY FOR HAYES.
with Hayes and his counsel. sena-
tor Jack Fitzgerald, big Tins" friend
and factotum. entered the court Fir.
gerald, who, II IL said. would be A
witness for Hayes. entered In earnest
conversatio with Lawyer Thncher for
several minutes.
Behind the denoted inspector came
the inspectors called as witnesses for
Waldo-Lahey, Cahalane. DAILY ana
Titus. Capt. william +. Day OF the
Fourth Inspection District Hayess
old bailiwick. also ranged himself SOL
EMMY In line. An eager crowd. In
GLIDING several women, pushed into
the courtroom after the inspectors.
"Not a word! Not a word until my
case IL on!' was Lawyer TEACHERS
answer to all questions. lie refused to
indulge In any speculation concerning
the possible effect of Commissioners
waido's temporary restoration TO duty
of the accused former inspector yes
tsrday.
Just before the proceedings opened
,t.,.. uaIkea over 20 the line OF In.
spectors and. with hands ON hips, stood
ch.,,,ng with them for several minutes.
yb., n. said was for their ears ex-
ciusiveiy.
I.ovai Leale. nm Assistan. Corporation
Counsel. appeared to assist Farley. has
colleague.
frat Dep,ty Commissioners Mckay
.,n.r.A court nj 10 o'clock.
eepvra Nor,ce THAT M'kAY
49,, ne w,1Ness
VIZ"
have u notion 10 mari. mn 80
NJ. Thaeher may say "a. ~,
Commissioner Mehay win DO .o
upon TO substantiate an important por.
} tion OF testimony for the defence. II
10 a matter OF common knowledge that
no Judge can SIT as q witness"
Mr.. Thacher then asked to be sworn
% that he could make tiss Natemen
under oatn. Inc oatn was aa'I'e', !,
ana MI. FHiey asAea W.T. A"~."e,
he would state whe'hsr or NOT ne ha.
claimed Commissioner mckay couie
have any pecunfary interest In the case
as,de from that of Judge. which coui,
Aia0ualifv him from acting.
~ ~. M .uch claim" wa, the nm
.,.. -. ~v.,
10 you msAe t"e e'~"' ""A' ;:
would ne disouahhed ny eohsahsuihi'S'
pursued Mr., Farley.
II do not" testified ,.r. Thacher.
a Then your whole protest Is based OF
The fact that a subpoena has beei
| ...rv.a unon Commissioner Mckay. an
-. -, ..,,.. a. ,na,cot. vh,. no,,,o
~. ,,...n,,a,.,..
~ he osiense ne ~
NJ ThAcner ao"'''eo 'n'' .ae'. pu
ne sasd that II maze no a'"e'e"ee
whether Mckay ware called ~ wa
ness or not. so long as he va In pos
. session of important factD concernin
T; the defense.
]. II submit Il would not only DO I'm
proper. but smb arrassing for him
I ssrvs." hs said.
.NAvRasS vgRAciTv At M'kAY'.
M9nrv ro,iNaet c0NreN0a.
Deputy MCKAY askeo MI. r"Issy VIVA
:s ' =: s. :. :; e.. % vi : In, a. ss