United labor bulletin., 1912-11-28
POSTAL LAWS SIDESTEPPED BY
COLORADO INDUSTRIAL REVIEW
CONTINUED from page 1.)

III (COntlnueu from page IL
J management of the paper was at faul
The newspapers of Denver and the pc
pie back of the Review, and especial
Mr.. Fox, knew the character of Gendrol
and they were at fault when they place
him in charge of the advertising of tn
paper.
The committee went further than thi
1t held up the report until after the ele'
tion for fear that the report would hun
the advertising of the Review durin
election. According to Mr. Spacey, men
ber of the committee, a meeting of tn
committee was not called for four week
at one time, yet progress was reporte
at every meeting of the assembly.
The Review Publishing company wa
originally Incorporated and the names o
L the incorporators filed with the secretar.
of state; but few, if any, of those incor
porators now are connected with th
publication.
The owners of the Review are so care
Il full about concealing the names of thu
owners of the paper and those who con
tribute to its support that they failed t.
comply with the act of Congress of Aug
"a, 1912, in making their statement t.
the postoffice department, by which the.
hope to retain the second class mai
service In the issue of Oct IS, 1912, tn,
Review printed the following statement
which it had previously filed with thu
department:
IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE NEW
/ ACT OF CONGRESS.
Statement of the ownership, man
agement, circulation, ETC., of The
Colorado Industrial Review, pub
lished weekly, at Denver, Colorado,
required by the Act of August "a,
h 1912.
Note.-This statement is to be
made in duplicate, both copies to be
1 delivered by the publisher to the
postmaster, who will send one copy
1 to the Third Assistant Postmaster
General Division of Classification,
Washington, D. c., and retain the
other in the files of the postoffice.
Name of editor. James Duce; post
office address, Denver, Colo.
Publisher, Review Printing Co..
Denver, Colo.
Owners. Qf corporation, give
names and addresses of stockhold-
| ers holding one per cent. or more
| of total amount of stock), Review
Printing Co., Denver, Colo.
Known bondholders, mortgages
and other security holders, holding
one per cent. or more of total
amount of bonds, mortgages or other
securities: None.
Average number of copies of each
issue of this publication sold or dis
tributed, through the mails or other
wise, to paid subscribers during the
six months preceding the date of this
statement: (This information re-
quired from daily newspapers only.
JAMES DUCE, Editor.
(Signature of Editor. Publisher,
Business Manager or Owner)
Sworn to and subscribed before
me this 5th day of October, 1912.
(SEAL)
ARTHUR J. STEPHENS,
Notary Public.
(My commission expires February
II, 1914.)
The law is SO plain that even a child
can understand it; yet the management
of the paper failed to comply with it.
and still hopes to be admitted to the
mails. The law says that the names oi
the owners and the postoffice addresses
shall be filed with the postofiice depart
ment. An extract from the law follows:
Sec. 4671a. 1t shall be the duty of
the editor, publisher, business man
ager, or owner of every newspaper,
magazine, periodical or other pub
lication to file with the postmaster
general and the postmaster at the
office at which said publication is
entered not later than the first day
of April and the first day of October
of each year, on blanks furnished by
the postoffice department, sworn
statement setting forth the NAMES
AND POSTOFFICE ADDRESSES of
the editor and managing editor,
PUBLISHER, business managers,
AND OWNERS, and, in addition, the
stockholders, if the publication be
owned by a corporation; and also
the names of known bondholders,
4 mortgages, or other security hold
ers.
The United Labor Bulletin believe
that these owners of the Review shOul
be exposed, if such there be other tina
the editor of the paper, and If Edito
Duce is the owner of the paper he shoul
file the same with the government an
also publish the fact in the Colorado II
dustrial Review.
1t is believed by many in the labo
movement that there are those benin
the paper who are paying the bills {
the paper. The paper is not doing sufi
cient business to pay its printing bill nc
to mention the wages of the editor an
of Harry w. Fox, who is travelling owe
the state endeavoring to get subscril
tions for the paper, according to his ow
statement. II this be SO, and it came
be otherwise, then someone must be pu
ting up money for the paper for tn
benefit they are receiving from it.
the financial hackers are receiving
service through the paper for the none
they are spending, then the articles col
veying that service should be marke
advertisements or the law is again bein
violated. according to this quotation frol
the law:
All editorial or other reading mat
ter published in any such newspa-
per, magazine. or periodical for the
publication of which MONEY OR
OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERA-
| TION is PAID. ACCEPTED, OR
PROMISED, shall be plainly
marked advertisement Any ed
itor or publisher printing editorial or
| other reading matter for which COM