Elk City mining news. (Elk City, Idaho) 1903-1913, 1912-07-11
Food Law Decisions.

The United States department of ag
riculture, has issued the following no
tees of judgments for violation of the
Pure Food law of June 80, 1906;
No. 1904, against Prussing Bros,
Montague, Mich, for adulterating and
misbranding cider vinegar. Product
condemned, but released to claimant
upon fling bond in $500.
No. 1908, against D. j. Gregory Vine
gar Company, Richmond, Va, for adul-
teration and misbranding vinegar.
Goods condemned and forfeited.
No. 1876, against the Harbauer Nc
Lean Co., Toledo, o., for adulteration
of tomato catsup. Goods condemned
and forfeited.
No. 1877, against six bales of coffee
in possession of the Aragon Coffee Co.,
Richmond, Va, and shipped by w. H.
Force & Co., and Mitchell Bros, New
York City. Goods condemned and for
feited.
No. 1920, against the New Blue Grass
Canning company, Greensboro, KY, for
adulteration and misbranding of "to-
mato puree," adulteration of "tomato
pulp" adulteration of "tomato cat
sup" Pleaded guilty and fined $25 and
costs.
No. 1928, against the Teasdale Fruit
& Net Products Company, Rogers, Ark,
for misbranding evaporated apples.
Pleaded guilty and fined $40 and costs
No. 1924, against Spiropoulos & Cos
talupes, San Francisco, Cal, for mis-
branding spaghetti and macaroni. Fined
$50.
No. 1925, against Stillman, Weight
& Co., Berlin, Wis, for misbranding
buckwheat flour Fined $25.
No. 1926, against A. c. Soper & Co.,
Farmingdale, N. j., for adulteration of
ketchup. Pleaded non vult, sentence
suspended.
No. 1929, against 225 cases of catsup
packed for the Biklen Wine Grocer
Co., Burlington, Ia. Product condemned
and forfeited, but released to claimant
on payment of costs, and fling bond.
No. 1882, against the Brewster Co
Goa Manufacturing Co., Jersey City, n
J., for adulteration and misbranding OF
chocolate. Pleaded non vult, and fined
500.
No. 1, 334, against the Harbauer- Mar
lean Co., Toledo, O., for misbranding OF
79S cases of tomato catsup, found II
possession of the Stone Ordean & Wells
Co., Duluth, MINI. Product condemned
and forfeited, but ordered released tt
claimants on filing bond of $1,000 anC
payment of $SS costs.
No. 1888, against the Salem Canning
Co., Daretown, N. j., for adulteratlol
of tomato paste. Fined S..
No. 1,349, against B. T. Chandler .
Son, Chicago, ILL.,, for adulteration an'
misbrandinp of apple cider vinegar
Fined 500 and costs.
No. 1852, against the Frazer Pack
ing Company, Elwood, Ind, for adul
teration of catsup. Products ordere'
condemned and destroyed.
No. 1856, against the Earll Mfg. com
pany, Kansas City, Mo-, for misbrandlni
apple butter. Fined $50 and costs;
No. 1858, against the Jersey Pack
ing Co., Cincinnati, o., for adulteratlo
of catsup. Product condemned and OF
dered destroyed.
No. 1868, against the Sharp Elliot
Manufacturing Co., Ell Paso, Tex, 10
misbranding vinegar. Fined 500.
No. 1871, against A. E. Pearson
Son, Lottsberg, Va, for adulteratlo
and misbranding of tomatoes 5000
condemned, but ordered returned
claimant upon fling bond of $4,000.
No. 1881, against the Atlas Preser'
ing Co., Baltimore, Md, for adulteri
ton of tomato catsup. Fined $40.
No. 1891, against S. ]. Van ILL
Co., Baltimore, Nd, for misbrandln
preserves. e cases.) Fined $1o o
each case.