The citizen. (Frederick City, Md.) 1895-1923, 1912-02-16
CIRCUIT COURT.

The cases of the Receivers OF the Far
mers Trust Banking and Deposit Co. vs..
The Frederick County stockholders was
taken up by the court There are num-
Der Of these stockholders in this county,
against their holdings OF stock the receIv-
ers acting under orders from Circuit
Court No =. of Baltimore, have laid an
assessment OF IS per cent for the purpose
OF hquidatiuS the Indebtedness OF the
company.
Nessrs. Uruer and Uru-r. Eichelber-
ger, Harp and Stouer and Weinberg filed
a demurrer. aud argument was heard by
the court. The demurrer bases its claim
upon three contentious. first that the Dill
Incorporating the banking company Is
unconstitutiou. |. in that it does not set
forth properly the title; second. that the
proper remedy IS in court OF equity
third. that the stock bought by the per
sons in this county contained provision
that stock vas worcestershire and Was
purchased II good faith and with this IN
derstandiuz.
Alexander Robertson. OF Baltimore,
and Charles P. Levy, OF Frederick, rep
resent the receivers. and addressed the
courr against the demurrer. which was
urged b. Mltou g. Timer, ST., and Leo
Weinberg
The court took the matter under ad-
viseuenc
The cases of Rev Paul n. KeitsrmaH
against Or. c. H. CouI-y and Or. R.
Caldwell Hume were continued. The
suits are for alleged SANDER
The case OF DR. Brooke |. JamIsOa, OF
Nail w Tertrr esylz
taken up before 4 Jury. The case Is on
ball for services rendered by Dr. IaEIsoa
10 Charles Selss, Who It Is alleged was
SHOT BY ! scu Of Mr.. Zentz- The bill IS
for treating the gun wound. Fluceu'
Seboii and loan : Newman represent
Or. Jsnisou, and StOner. Weinberg and
Hap appear tor Mr. LeHtz-
Verdict for Zentz was rendered by the
Jury.
IRE case of DR.. 4. Barr SniveIy against
Mr. Z=ayz tor $3.50 was non pressed
The cas- Of Boaz Gardiner, Of Smiths
burg W Mr. ;. y WitiuP. an abscoHd
ing debtor was heard by the court Nr.
Gardiner attached money n the hands Of
Dr.. H F. Fzh-u=y Who was secretary Of
the Washington Msry.sud Realty Com
PAW II which Widiqp was entrusted
The court decided II favor Of Gardner,
stating ne money attached was The ptop-
errv Of the company ana not WIdtGp Is
be claimed.
Blck-v and Woliug=r for Gardiue.
C0bl=az Brown ard Matthias tor the
compl1.
Tie case Of George E. Keepers vs.
Upton F. Meh-Iing was taken up before
4 iurv N FRIDAY morning The sur S
over ! Michel automobile. which Ntr
keeg-r sold N-h-nZ and winch the
latter alleges I'D V1s come up to rep
resent t1DoGs. N-1rr0g gave 4 check for
SIS for tile automobile. and couC=Gds
thar when DC found that il did Hot meet
the repr eseHtzCiJHs. stopped the payment
Of the check Nr. Mehriug claims thar
the automobile, although a second hand
one, was all right, wien It LEFT his place.
Vincent Sebold and 2 l. St1uer, repre-
sent Keeper and D. Princeton 81 KEY
r. presented Mehrinz
The case OF Gertrude Stambaagh vs..
Liuuf- F'rUcs was called The case
was an sctiou for SANDER brOugh. by
Mss S5ambaugh against Mrs. FrOck,
for alleged statements Rejecting upou
her character and chastity Miss Siam
oaug1 asked damages. When the case
was taken up, the attorneys for the de-
fsnse IN open court stated that their
client had never spoken the words and
their client rad stated that she knew
nothing against the character oF the
yourg woman This Statement was AZ
Cepr-d a, a complete yindicaEion by Mss
Stambansd and the attorneys for r :
41uo NEED that the case would he
dropped. Slon-l and W-inber. repre-
seHr-d Miss S5ambiugt1 and W-au5 and
Willard appeared ior Mrs FrOck