The Fairmont West Virginian. (Fairmont, W. Va.) 1904-1914, 1912-03-11

Ior,tr 10 c1rrI OIL its UIII. they would
,oee if,ir IndieaI character entirely
and ,he So called decentralization of
Justice would be farce.
p.s..., 1. Ia5;e;sl 1rseeders,s
49," 49, ,,.. AZ N,nS.
,saf!is J, XXX ,,,, ~ soy, z
'sp u ~ ~ x H. ,.ossa
y Xxx, 'g','' NJ
l9ai i'.. m,
.iay 4 I. < Is X az ;,on,.,i..
sls ~ ,,as,, !, n ti,e III.
. lEL y ~ ~ si. ~ ~ rs
ing t9ltloElss ,lls N IN ;ss
gore Hgg - az W, g s,,.,e5;,
y # y Y. I ~ ss s s,Is s,srsoci
cpleets " \, Il. (. u ,,,,s,,,s IS Il
sgS + XII, 49, I, Z, ri, Fe.
sl " 1. ~ & " n ~
igsHl: y !; J: - t6s
t q y I s ~. s. y. Il: ss,I
,yIllss TX gs ~. TX 49, 9is;d
ies tlepsl tls g, e;,.si Him.
!gsi ehe', ltsl H. y IStsSs
tipn ana esIeui,,ts ~, = z m. az
Hlsss N, ,sts ,,,,r ,,diciSrv
=, X ~ &, M NJ N tba
.4 ~ I, " u ts,,"tSIs iS tss nf6csiIrre
ll ( ,'tT Ie.s,, VI " u Az iS,l,Sas
gnu y J, osg,... =, u, ebi,,, right
ssy ~ sf, noSi,is, INN, "a M
y, az ,;.,,.a,. g-oy, Ibo
geslI y uT.e w !. s -, y ~, i,,,.v and
alu - ~, w, - ~. 49,. ~ n,,1,tc c6oa
tt4s il's ~ ,.S ~. - ~. ,;n,iTsI Inv
Y lile el.oase'as"I 49,, ans are
spen le1esss aS "a .ss ~, - fhe
Sonpls,eis vim. .ha s IN SrS cons,ess
=. ~ ~. s ,,s. .,,at ,Ss n,ove.
Anq alh s,au y hS ',' ,,e e.' occo,eroted
mept lot rsi .sn . ias 80 ss.,sysI liar
p acIloa q .ue ~, ',.e aas Ien,, for da
Assls 4: 81" y. -. ,%.r ' s,,,,,rs
elueu pStiSss ~. $3.50 ! tSotr
sut tless !, l ~ a,.a ,et - ths snsc.
lealgus lrslneul.s az =. ". IN ~, naittSs,
taeliar; s.l.s IS = EJECT efr6yf nam
4, - ,sa y. 80 ~ renedai
SlEsis I'M ~ TS ~, tcy,nIfIsI,le attacjl ,IDon
y our judiciary nov IS that The judges DO
Ispot respond sufficiently n9pqlaf 6pln-
E'ion, Its said taqt courts are 1ntefPps-
Ling their obstructive power to the en-
forcement Of LEGISLATION looslng % sne
relief Of the o1pressed by declaring
laws unconstitutional and by SO callea
judicial Legislation in interpreting into
statutes words not intended by tne
Legislature. lido not intend TO discuss
these charges. although IL reduced to
specific eases it,TOuld be easy to show
| nlanysof them to be unfou1ded. for
the purposes OF this discussion may
admit that courts have erred IN TINS
regard. have mdtly broadened con;
stitutional rcstflStlons IN order e. ~
validate useful statutes or have given
such statutes a wrong construction
How Is it proposed to remedy these
! wroAgs ?asinyona Of two Ways-eltler
Iaby the judicial recall or oyathe recall
Eof judicial decisions Let us exanlne'
kthesc remedies sepafatelyi r. Y
lyd s4el Inaioiat Recall 9'
sii1 IN, lIf II !, s! sI,;d,Sc;a, recall Il
- " I, IA ~ Isl. = r. Law that
y I I = ~. !, MIX Nc 80 discharged
%Rsi " gl 4 f5ii 49, 'cs5tsin SsF.
a.s a,s e sb la, 6Isstarate "a deem il
sas.sss ss ,on Siai hin and tbat ,,er.
o ,s ~ S:,sn \, astflon askine his re.
osIl sn eiection shaIl fake place in
III. the lnrnmhent shall stand
or . ofber Sss,iidates and il he
Ssas, notssoc,,ress nInraIity Of votes,
S W. =, tns1 ssctc. ros,oyed have point,
III nI =, or t ,,,at ySass o,,r form Of Govern.
is;o9t oST SonsfiiStion many Of the Isl
.,, st s ~, SsfGlc o,,r courts arc III
a asraof Issues bstTeen the state and lie
,n;,,,.i;inal bstwgaan the majority and
t, ,o' , a cosss IN which the popu..
s's + ,srast mig6f no greatly excited to
~ in,e ( sororol,o ipdgment By tIis
$50 $50, 40 cr,os,ie S whether the iudge
~ I ~ l;o remoyeI mr. not Is 10 be left to
. - ~ ~ ,noior,iv That NAV lie greatly
. .nau ,"t ~ secnrn from him 4 iudg.
% p,o,,. Tarorohle y them Could a sys.
, ,,r: IN dayissI lietter adaptcd TO de.
n rSilr ~ t,,n iTltciaty Of That ipdepenl.
ence without which the liberty aud
other rights Of tie individual cannon
be maintained against the government