The Republican journal., 1912-04-18
L. L. Rogers VS.. Orison Chandler Bank
ruptcy of defendant suggested Dunton &

ruptcy OF defendant suggested. Dunton &
Morse. H. H. Thurlough.
A. ]. McKeen VS.. A. F. Elwell. Neither
party. Dunton & Morse. A. F. Elwell pro Sc.
Young, Cox & Payson vs.. Eastman Car Co.
Continued. Dunton & Morse. G. E. THOMPSON.
John F. Vickery vs.. Wifred E. Jones. judg-
ment as OF mortgage. Ritchie. 'Buzzell...
Orman A. Hopkins vs. George Seavey, Con-
tinued. Ritchie. Dunton & Morse
y. F. Vickery vs. W. E. Jones & Co. and j.
A. McKeen & Son trustee. Continued. Richie.
Buzzell.
Abbie L. Otis VS.. John W. Durost Contin-
ued. E. F. Lttlefeld. Richie.
Four cases of j. F. Vickery VS.. w. E. Jones
& Co. and individually. Bankruptcy of de-
PENDANTS suggested. Ritchie and Doak. Buz-
zell.
Isaac Wallace VS.. VIM. Cochran. Neither
party, no further action. Bangs. Runnells.
Nelson West vs. Charles Mudgett. Neither
party. Libby. Bowden.
Frank p. Baker VS.. Thomas Bradbury. De-
faulted for $275o and costs by agreement
Mayo & Snare. E. F. Smith.
John Cole vs. Luther W. Frederick Con-
tinued. Bowden. Ritchie.
M. 5. Ekquist VS.. D. Marshall. Neither
party, no further action. Brown. Ritcher
Isabel Fishe, Libt, VS.. John A. Fiske. Dis
missed. Brown. Hartman
The following new entries were made We'd
nesday:
land Gray trustee. Motion for order of SER
vice filed and granted; personal service. Buz-
zel. Ritchie.
Herbert Black VS.. J. F. Spellman. Neither
party. Buzzell. Martin e. Cook.
The Atwood Mitchell Co. VS.. Mrs Harry w.
Baker. Continued by agreement. Knowlton
| Hartman.
Wayland Knowlton VS.. VIM Hewes and A.
| H. Coon. Discontinued as to A. H. Coon.
Knowlton.
The first case opened to the jury was Leslie
Lowe VS.. C. H. Mitchell and Forest Knowlton,
Monroe parties, an action to recover dwell
ling house worth $500, woodshed, S76 and
hen house, s25, $40O in all, owned by Leslie
Lowe, on land owned by Helen A. Lowe. Her
foster son, Leslie Lowe, put the buildings OH
the land at her request Mrs. Lowe sold the
land Nov. 8. 1909, to Mitchell and Knowlton,
not including the buildings. April 2, 1911, the
| defendants sold the land and buildings to EN-
ma S. Curtis. Dunton & Morse for plaintiff
Arthur Ritchie and Ellery Bowden for defen d.
ants. Verdict for the plaintiff for $264S SO.
NEW ENTRIES.
H. c. Buzzell, Esq, entered twenty -one new
cases, as follows:
Robert H. Patterson, liblt., VS.. Ida M. Patter-
son. libellee; Edwin D. Curtis. liblt., VS.. Mary
A. Curtis, hbellee; Josephine A. White, liblt.,
vs. William B. White, ibellee. H. N. Little
held, admir-, VS.. John Larrabee; Clarence H.
Shuman, VS.. Fred S. Walker; Ella M. Langille,
liblt, VS.. Charles H. Langille, libellee; Linley
r. K. Ellis. VS.. George L. Benson; F. E. Stin-
son, VS.. Charles Lowe; H. C. Buzzell, VS..
Charles w. Emerson; Titcomb Brothers, VS..
Frank Gray; Perley F. Gordon, VS.. Inhabitants
Of Waldo; Alonzo 7. Nickerson, lbt., VS.. Daisy
J. Nickerson, libellee; A. R. Curtis, M. D., VS..
William I'M George; H. e. Buzzell, vs.. Rose B. and
John Wallace; Lancaster and Staples, VS.. Roy
Wright; L. F. Nash, vs. Hollis Wentworth; P.
5. Edgecomb, VS.. Theodore Durost; Frank A.
Benner, vs.. George Stevens; William V. Reed,
VS.. David E. Walker; Lydia A. Moody, VS. Della
Richards.
Dunton & Morse entered the following:
Ellen II. Sanborn, Executrix, VS.. Arthur l.
jackson, Ellen Jackson and H. Stanton Sawyer
Parmenter & Polsey Fertilizer Company VS.. j.
q. Small; Milton B. Hills and Irwin o. Hills VS..
John c. Ham; ]. W. Levenseer VS.. Almont L.
Ripley; Fields S. Pendleton VS.. Caleb F. Pendle-
ton; City National Bank of Belfast vs. Herbert
Littlefeld.
Arthur Ritchie, Esq, has the following new
entries:
Milliken & Tomlinson VS. McGray; Waldo
Trust Company VS. L. F. Allenwood, ct al.
Jackson & Hall VS. McGray; Loren Small VS.
Bessey: Leroy Webber VS. Celia Webber; Car.
ter & Meigs VS. F. c. Atwood; Margaret A
Niles, appeal from decree of Judge of Probate
Haskell, Adams & Co., VS. A. T. McKenney
Continental Jewelry Co., VS. H. c. Jenkins
Charles E. Lane VS. VIM. A. Ryan; Percy LIE.
man VS. E. C. Hanna; A. H. McGray VS. O. B
Woodbury.; Daisy T. Nlckerson VS. A. T. Nick.
erson; John A. Fogg VS. J. J. Emery, ct al; VIM
o. Poor & Son VS. same; Mason & Hall VS. same
jackson & Hall VS. same; Cooper & Co. VS. same
Brown. Jr, of Brooks presented five cases
John M. Ward VS.. Arthur M. Jackson; Joseph
Roberts VS.. A. A. Hartley; M. W. SWEET VS.
Robert H. McGray; N. E. Barker VS.. Herbert
Littlefield; Mclean Black & Co. Inc, vs. George
A. and Inez M. Goodwin.
James S. Hartman, three cases: Mary
Sylvester, libt., VS.. VIM. D. Sylvester; Samuel
A. Payson vs. Rose Ellen Duhamel; Louis S
Shire VS.. F. L. Gray.
James Libby three cases: Olive Curtis, libt
VS.. Winfield S. Curtis; Sarah Clough, libt., vs.
Everett A. Clough; Harold L. Hurd VS.. J. w
McKenney.
Carleton Doak. two cases: Belfast Fuel &
Hay Co., VS.. Clara Sprague; Albert A. Sheldon
libt. VS.. Emma E. Sheldon.
Wayla.d Knowlton eight cases., Atwood
Mitchell, Co. VS. Mrs. Harry w. Baker; Way
land Knowlton VS. VIM. Hewes and A. H. Coon;
Lewis A. Brown VS. Edward E. and Ella L. Bab-
cock; Fred Racklif VS. Fidelphus Flagg; Fred
A. johnson VS. E. Lawrence Williams; Charles
=. Eaton VS. Fred Curtis; Fred G. Gray VS. Asher
Moody: H: M. Flagg, app, VS. VIM. Bickford.
II. p. Bangs, presented four cases: J. F.
Wheaton VS. Fred Heating; S. M. Webber VS.
George Auspland; ]. F. Wheaton VS. Miles Tow
ers; Drake & Crosby VS. Hattie Mcdonald.
Other cases were presented as follows: C.
F. Smalley presented Edith M. Marshall, Libt.,
VS.. Ferdinand H. Marshall; L. R. Folsom pre-
sented Charles A. Bruce VS.. May B. Tibbetts;
Mayo & Snare presented Charles A. McKen-
ney VS.. Charles A. Bowdoin; Montgomery &
Emery presented Irene Knight, Libt, VS.. Lind
ley A. Knight; F. A. Greer presented George
Hubbard & Co. VS.. S. W. Newcomb; G. G.
Weeks presented two cases, Della Bessey vs.
E. F. Bicaford and Ida j. Ferguson Libt., vs.
Melvin R. Ferguson; R. w. Rogers presented
Howard L. Hurd, appealed from decision OF
County Commissioners; R. E. Jeffery presented
Mary A. Curtis, Libt., VS.. Edwin D. Curtis; w
c. T. Runnells presented R. B. Robinson VS.
VIM. Q. Spinney; H. c. Buzzell later presented
Gertrude E. Webber VS.. VIM. Keene and
Arthur Ritcher later presented E. A. Holmes
VS.. j. A. McKeen appealed. McRosen pre-.
sented Hamilton Bros Shoe Co. vs. E. H, and
VIM. H. Rosen.
CRIMINAL DOCKET.
Judge Wayland Knowlton of the Municipal
Court entered the following appealed cases:
State vs. John D. Mcdonald.
State VS. Thomas Berry.
State VS. Augustus Payson.
State VS. VIM. o. Aldus.
State vs. Rocco Campanella.
State VS. Rocco Campanella.
State VS. Joseph Rich.
State VS. Joseph Rich.
State VS. Edwin A. Jones.
State VS. Eben Holmes.
State VS. True G. Trundy