Courier Democrat. (Langdon, N.D.) 1891-1920, 1912-01-11
BY ANNA
KATHARINE
GREEN
Copyright 1870.
By Anna Katharine Rohlfs
CHAPTER XVII.
III THIS STOOD.

SH 5000
details of the trial. also much of
preliminary testimony. Enough
that at the close Of the sixth day
the outlook wa a serious n for Ar
thur Cumberland. The prosecution ap-
peared to be making good its claims.
The quiet and unexpectedly digniied
way in which at the beginning the
defendant had faced the whole antag-
onistic courtroom with the simple
plea of mot guilty" was being slowly
but surely forgotten in the accumulat-
ed proofs of his discontinued life under
his sisters dominating influence. his
desire for independence and a free use
of the money held in trust for him by
this sister under their fathers will,
the quarrels which such a situation
would naturally evoke between charac-
tiers cast in such different molds and
actuated by such opposing tastes and
principles, and the final elimination
of the same at the dinner table when
Adelaide forced him. as it were. to sub
use Of liquor in their house. Follow
ing this evidence. Of motive came the
still more damaging one of oppor-
tunity. He vas shown to have been
in the clubhouse at or near the time of
Adelaide's death. The matter of the
bottles was gone into and the event in
Cuthbert road. Then I was called to
the stand and my testimony asked for.
l had prepared myself for the ordeal
and faced it unfinchingly. That L
might keep intact the n point neces-
sary to Carmel's safety I met my in
quisitors now, as before. with the ut
most candor in all other respects. In
deed. in n particular l was even
more exact in my details than at any
previous examination. I acknowledged
what l had hitherto concealed. that in
my first entrance into the clubhouse l
had come upon a mans derby hat and
coat hanging in the lower hall. and
when questioned more minutely on the
subject allowed it to appear that it
was owing to the disappearance Of
these articles during my stay upstairs
that l had been led into saying that
some one had driven away from the
Whispering Pines before the coming
of the police.
This, as you will sec, was in open
contradiction of my former statements
that I had seen an unknown party
thus attired driving away through the
upper gateway just as I entered by
the lower. But it was a contradiction
which, while noted by Mr.. Moffat,
Arthur's lawyer, failed to injure me
with the jury and much less with the
spectators. That I should prevaricate
ever to my own detriment at a pre-
liminary examination only to tell the
truth openly and like a a when in
court and under the sanctity Of an
oath was. in the popular estimation.
something to my credit. and Mr.. Moi
fat. whose chief recommendation as
counsel lay in his quick appreciation
of the exigencies of the moment. did
not press me too sharply on this point
when he came to his cross examina-
ton.
But in other respects he drove me
hard. An effort was made by him
first of all to discredit me as a wit
less. NY lack of appreciation for
Adelaide and my secret but absorbing
love for Carmel were inexorably
brought out: also the easy. happy-go-
lucky ten, of my life and my logged
persistence in any course I thought
consistent with my happiness. My
character was well known in this
town of my birth, and it would have
been folly for me to attempt to gloss
it over. l had not even the desire to
do so. If my sins eXacted penance l
would pay It here and now and to the
full. Only Carmel should not suffer.
I refused to admit that she had given
any evidences Of returning my reck-
less passion. My tongue would not
speak the necessary words. and it was
not made to. 1t was not her charac-
ter. but mine. which Mr.. Moffat was
e%ndeavoring to assail.
But though | was thus shown up
for what l was. in a manner most
public. and undesirable. neither the
rulings of the court nor the attitude
Of the jury betrayed any loss Of con-
idence in me as a credible witness.
and. seeing this. the willy lawyer shift
ed his ground and confined himself to
an endeavor to shake me on certain
definite and important points concern
ing my finding Of the body. Then he
branched off into a less narrowing
topic and cross examined M in re-
gard to the ring. l had said that 1t
was on her hand when I babe goodby
to her in her own house and that it
was not there when I came upon her
dead. Had the fact made me curious
to examine the hand? No. Then I
could not tell whether the finger on
which she wore it gave any evidence
ST this ring having been pulled off
with violence? No. I could not swear
that in my opinion it was? l could
not.
The small flask Of cordial and the
three glasses, one clean and the 9th
ers showing signs Of having been used.
were next taken, up. but with no re-
suit for the defense. I had told all l
knew about these in my direct exami-