Essex County herald. [volume] (Guildhall, Vt.) 1873-1964, 1912-10-18
Footwear OF United States
Standard for Universe.
Backward Evolution In Foot Covering
Puts the Wearer Behind the An
clients In Walking Ability
Has Many Defects.

New York.-Everybody wears shoes
at least one size too small, it is as
serted, and with toes too narrow.
This gives room for only the great toe
to grow and perform its functions,
but congresses the other toes until
the smallest one is a mere scrap. The
foot of man should spread like an ami
mails paw with every step he takes.
This is impossible in a shoe which
"f1ts" the foot
Walter c. Taylor, editor-in-chief OF
the Boot and Shoe Recorder, says:
THE greatest waste In shoe buying
is one for which the consumer him.
self is largely responsible 1t comes
through the buying of shoes which
are poorly fitted" -
We not only wear.~cur shoes too
small and our heels too high but we
allow fashion to influence US, and
there Is constant demand for
change in style and material; de-
mand which the manufacturers supply
abundantly." Mr. Taylor says that II
and to the consumer If this could be
righted by a common sense view OF
our foot covering. OF course the
women are blamed for the greater
part OF this extravaganza, for dainty
foot has long been considered much
to be desired. Gradually shoes have
developed iuto things of beauty mere
ly and we buy them with the thought
of their appearance and not Of their
use In fact, Americans, as rule,
do not expect to walk great distances.
1t seems that the development OF
the shoemaker's art Is In inverse ratio
to the development of the foot, for
here in America our feet are notori.
ously undeveloped. and yet America
leads the world in the making OF
shoes Almost everything else in the
way of wearing apparel depends more
or less on foreign importatlons, but
America influences the shoe styles
OF England, Germany and France. and
American methods are standard for
the world
American supremacy In shoemaking
is due largely to specialization.
Abroad ali operative does half a
dozen different things; here he per-
forms one simple process. and here
also one factory makes one kind OF
shoes If a large manufacturer makes
different kinds OF shoes he has a
separate factory for each kind
What sight the modern shoe fac
tory would be to the primitive shoe
maker OF colonial days, who was an
itinerant workman, carried his tools
with him and stayed with each family
= long enough TO make up the farmers
supply OF home tanned leather into
shoes enough to last until his next
annual visit. His last was roughly
suit the largest foot In the family,
and then pared down for the success
sive sizes He sat on a low bench,
one end Df which was divided into
compartments where his avis ham
mers, knives and rasps were kept,
with his pots of paste and backing.
his pals thread. Innings and buttons,
shoulder sticks" and rub sticks
With all OF our wonderful machin-
cry we produce shoes which are not
so good for our feet, as the most prim
tive and simplest OF foot coverings
the sandal which is considered ideal
by those who appreciate the beauty OF
the human foot and wish to preserve
IT. The, sandal was worn by the an
cient Egyptians and Greeks and the
shoes" OF the Bible were sandals
The same type IL still worn by the
peoples OF Central Asia. India. Japan
and China.
The Indian moccasin, which extends
over the top Of the foot. but has the
sole aud main part In one piece. IA