The evening world., 1912-11-19
REVIEW TESTIMONY AS TC
MEETING WITH oUNMEN.

| tne huhf Oh typ the BlOod. snal
refer to him as 'Gyp'"
REVIEW TESTIMONY AS TO
MEEriNc wiru oi,NurN
- - o','"-',
.ns $3.50 , o III 'neI .ook UP ,he evluohc,
90. ...u I'm u,ss. he nau Pr.p.' "a
va w 'es'.,nony VI po,n s'ues. Ts' re
.'en'loheo ,ne meeting IN the care Beau
Ns pc.Ween JACK rose sam Paul.
h&ry Naioh ana 'eity ana 'Whltey
on may ~ when JACK hose sought TO
impress on the eunmen that nc ana Weo-
ger had nad no'hing 10 DO with the IRAN.
INF OF Jack Ieig' Ihen he reviewed
,ne second meeting on June between
hose aho the gangstcrs IN leftys
southern boulevard nat. II was then the
court said the name OF Rosenthal was
hrst mentioned ana Rose told Lefty
and Whitley" that they would be In
danger unless Beckcr wos brought
around In their favor by having his
enemy put out OF the way. This was
the first discussion OF the murder plot.
From this meeting Justice Gon asked
| the Jury TO follow the course OF the
testimony through Its various stages to
| the contamination OF the murder plot
first. the conference In the Lafayette
Baths, where Rose had insisted 10 he
gunner that Becker was chafing Mt the
delay OF the gang In failing to croak
Rosenthal;' secondly the rendezvous
at the Garden Restaurant, where Rosen-
thai was dining and whore the murder
was frustrated by the alleged presence
or Burns man, and. finally. the &C.
currences on che night OF the murder.
including the hiring Of the murder car.
the assembling or the gunner in Web
bers poker rooms and the drive TO the
scene or the assassination.
Justice Con described the killing In
detail and summarized the testimony OF
the states eye witnesses-"St anlsch,
who saw whitley point n pistol at Ro-
seminars head and fire two shots;
kra,ise. who saw Gyp' and Lefty and
Whitley surround Rosenthal with re-
volvers In their hands. and Luban. who
saw Frank, Lefty and 'Gyp' shooting
but who failed TO see Whitley"
Taxing up tho events subsequent to
the murder. the Court read from Jack
Roses testimony the States evidence
that Rose had met the gunner and
paid them for their services.
This was all for the Peoples case
ana the Judge took up the testimony
OF the defendants and their theory
that they had been used as decoys by
Rose and Webber and were merely
innocent lookers-on at the murder.
Cohciudihg with his BRIEF or the
evidence on both sides. the Court said:
"osntismen, we have here the
most remarkable situation In GRIM
inal annals In tho city. The prose-
cution' ohisny through the tssta-
mony OF JACK Rose, charges that
herman 1ossnthM was murdered
~ tnese -FOUR defendents. IN their
.W. ant. sns o 49,. E.n.s ~ 10 .VsS
! was murdered, but We didn't DO IL
You oad' 1eO you nave shs 40
cussa accusing sne scoussfe'
VIII say again tnst tho situAsaon ID
unique IN o7minai annals.
commenting upon 'he contention or
the defense that Rose haa shared the
detendants IN a WHY trap TO make II
appear mat they had committed the
murder. Just'ce CON SAID that the mo-
ton presented by the defense was
falsely constructed
hoj are asked 10 oeieve, ne said'
that JACK Rose raisely accused these
defendants or the murder because he
feared them' because he feared that
| they would do him bodily harm as n re-
suit OF their suspicious that he had had