The Mathews journal. (Mathews C.H. [Court House]) 1903-1937, 1912-01-04
BpED BaR0ESsFLOT
FALLHkLIS THROUGH


he'Chao G0Sp9lA--SpeciaL- at
sOstcero tentpteof eninnilliOnaire Chicago
glcloEe$ paekS5sfon trial fof criminal violation
HIS sleeps tsn SarsSrhRfs ahtiStrust law to es-
cape thr onaIie ahsoughi ~ new Immunity bath
ieNpl str E6 ed tutaS Cagn6Se Carpenter, in the
an 9as EIItits Dss1tes Dlsrrlct Court where
lyhe We@f ther0eSf abarosSS are. on trial, over
ftied hSoul0nspbykene packers attor-
get 20 tneSsd to texeop6S yteseinony concerning
fdperatiob epenaubns a6e gtte talleged beef trust
prior to ltsd6r secaSes dSeeaessrof the previous
pfRhmurit kinfIatni tyr abAeh granted to seven of
tsecoadI the hSaGlIeisebsI Jpdse Humphrey.
oTlthe ihmrht ynSufan nSoSoch motions of the
Iliahksrs po<<spsrs eTineSS enpfreIy unexpected
eahh cad ahdeIha rlabcsS bnnlied by the beef
fnitr chat S1 nnen Soop TO thwart the
goEhosei sAe ufSnnss attempts to prose-
attn Jtir o,rtss the beef trust
Sustnns Sfoornev sgcor mo government contest
iNdyeac$R en1Ht bitterly.
A. h VeAdGRI- cVsedSr tlOnea or the attorneys
fSiraaiA kfOelSene pec ans ass the first witness
fs4HeSl0Pcan6d Tor etnDn asCee fnrnent, following
7ertaAgeoo eeeIsion against the
p Yfrs WIS tSrfafln MO Barn. motions.
he ma&R$ iIItVwaSetfS VS&S9erSs aCfice that head
hiEaatste9 qpfaftIrsohf 6nSf oaa obeef pool which
eFeHe RSekeHs PaukerSxtRfnttt 0xisted. was main
q tefn aefesmed srsoerns aisS 6rganization Of the
National Nstibirsa eauhnasy Company which the
eea<NeIni COVER inens nE1ntEins 10 still the same
feldneeRt dnal atee1ntYuke, onisr IN q form which
EhatTHss IanSDao falITuus tSmhsGnity bath given
the pacfttxg bScNsrstes4v SRseedj States Judge
as res Es a5.in sSri sshse esaaence OF an exist
n {ttpepoOl iDgiq1odp pkd6r TO UtlS 1. 1905 could
ahhad beehAhebaEss rTnen nee hSton OF the Govern
III ment. ~frnRrt evSnsh c1ssErst witness called
charge
against hEaustckhRe bselssfs Wy showing the
eXistencf e0Stsn Gel paalkS aooling agreement
betleeT bdtsv ltiIS IsCckfng house interests
Onl this Onrothise ptefniSep the Government
4ed tPhspes tths hdRe thsto The incorporation
4e 0Satth5al n 3taS1ka1s Packing Company
<&t2#k lOteookhDvt1n the n fun tionB of the old
s dg4 H1uIie3er tflInpnrSsis ~inimunity bath
X#S& %dtrsaEstauednstesed gJn the ground that
&TH r}adtt pack esSiI head GAINED immunity by
8nf stgtiIs sestisnteIy sefore Secretary
81 eF laan9si ard Ca raSldritf his trust irvesti-
A&&oh. gatfCns the wssS tine contention of the
SEe dRsentsee thare che efhnee defendants not
MS4&uf finTI1ut&C JtplrUAl i'm Iunity bath be
TlE%ni hnteA ct q mn aeSl the same showing
80 tDfsnppofh s6pbefr 0fetheir plea as that
H5Hch ER1nfrh tlpatTe sShetft associates immu-
IM il tAnSs irTbSo5o reFhtet h4ee defendants in
eH fuoitaa niea htee ssieE were Edward Til
$4tfF. EodenSi Observation-Disclosures and Francis A.
tTlErl Fowler.
1901 sIiecia S4beaiaT apl etn twas einterposed on
eStff II f6ehalElor pNeySfef Sn1the ground that
'ssA had me cha da been acaaldd and had testified
&4EEh VI hse - btci0SSs sbef6re a Federal grand
L. 5nrEn s@fE dtScestlEation OF the packers
Z<f&# % 81 in 1895.
4ufgb C5uneRt era r4ssheer adened all pleas of
NJ i'm InuG tyr CseNdd ordered exceptions in
B3 alf ltfehhh d6 dtaee defe71se noted at every
3hd j Itdin TT tnotfSe ThSefds where such excep
SE<8H IN itidm nIiEht apply.
ss{NM hGer, Webder iswlfen istt an attorney for
|&N&Etff fSWFdcn 10 nGoTfPans Tsthe first witness,
]4t hd wits nquesteon ed tbssle Attorney Pierce
l9r. Butter ISfu st. TleHis whose examina-
53@h lO1 tiOn Uftahss vathess rs the first active
at lh3 pHas ts5S 4Is n Ghen IN the trial.
f.IA,&F ef der EeSdep stSidwfn answer to questions
M I'D ttTat hse an lseearaH attorney for Swift
Pt tgfpuraS@B Sin Hsssai'H He said except
Dad Has heyhadb sIs5Se uSsent interested in the
T-3t <nE ushe id He said he had or
~ -Thize4 gahize&wtfie cSH1fr corporation, and
had oT dead eonce e4rtSrdIrector of the con-
Germ. hJre rmvbn thnevef eAad been a officer.
he fasIfesEeds MhRedtSshat the subsidiary
t of1 tha hceTsr4 Ahes or corporation are He
Wbrkebsd epled rorphea tiSrp 6ftYton laws of the
ZEN ahfpe dif1sFeast Saatesit1ste necessary for
who HAS efass no organize selling and
For in
'ei IN ~ lSwdfinlSa Tyonafa Hfai OF Maine which
irohpels itnt est Nh YhS IrS4s England states
then dthRn ishS1Sifts tSw9ftin& Company of
a New VI NbwaN6rap Ind Sff Louisiana there is n
tax oT ta1leen sales e07n foreign concerns so
v we hal yves mite IS ~lFpl 81 Company of Louis
Ras1 lana"