The Watertown weekly leader. [volume] (Watertown, Jefferson County, Wis.) 1912-1917, 1912-08-02
The TRUTH ABOUT !
THOSE DELEGATES
Roosevelt Contests InstIgated
to Deceive the Public.
ALL BUT IA WERE ABANDONED


That the Tribunal. Which Decided
These Contents In Favor Of Mr.. Taft
Were Right In Every instancs-Ths
Remaining 1854 Contests Were Frivol-
GUS, and Their Prompt Abandonment
Reflects Upon the Gsnunsness and
Validity of the Remainder.
Washington. July 29.-Here are the
facts in relation to the contested seats
In the Republican national convention.
1t In q summary of q detailed state
ment going carefully into all of the
cases. a statement SO thorough that ii
takes up $50 pages of printed matter.
This statement Is signed by Mr.. Victor
Rosewater. chairman Of the former Re-
publican national committee; by Mr.. J.
II. Devfne Of Colorado, chairman Of the
committee on credentials Of the Repub-
lican national convention. and by Mr..
Charles D. Hilles, chairman of the
present Republican national committee
The total number of delegates sum-
moned to the convention under its call
was LOTS. with $40 necessary to a
choice. Mr.. Taft had 561 votes ON the
nrst and only ballot and was declared
the nominee. There were instituted
against 238 of the delegates regularly
elected for Taft contests on behalf of
Roosevelt These contests were avow-
sdly instigated not for the purpose OF
really securing seats In the convention,
not for this purpose Of adducing evil
dencs which would lead any respect
able court to entertain the contests, but
for the purpose Of deceiving the public
into the belief that Mr. Roosevelt had
more votes than he really had, as the
conventions and primaries were In
progress for the selection Of delegates
This II not only necessary inference
from the character of the contests, but
1t was boldly avowed by the chief edi-
tor OF the newspapers owned by Mr..
Aunsey. who has been Mr.. Roosevelt's
chief financial and newspaper sup
porter. The 238 contests were reduced
by abandonment to seventy four.
The very fact Of these 1874 frivolous
contests itself reflects upon the genu-
ineness and validity OF the remainder.
The seventy-four delegates include six
1t large from Arizona. four at large
from Kentucky, four at large from In
diana, six ut large from Michigan,
eight ut large from Texas and eight at
large from Washington. and also two
district delegates each from the Ninth
Alaba ma, the Fifth Arkansas, the
Thirteenth Indiana. the Seventh,
Eighth and Eleventh Kentucky, the
Third Oklahoma, the Second Tennes-
see and from each of nine districts, the
First. Second. Fourth. Fifth. Seventh.
Eighth, Ninth. Tenth and Fourteenth
Of Texas.
CONTESTED DELEGATES AT
LARGE.
Arizona.
In the Arizona convention there were
ninety three votes. All the delegates
six In number-were to be selected at
large. The counties were entitled to Sc
lect their delegates through their coun-
~ committee or by primary. In one
county. Aaricopa. q majority of the
committee decided to select its dele
gates and 4 minority to have q pri-
mary. In other counties there were
some contests. and the sttae commit
tee. following the usage of the national
committee, gave-a hearing to all con-
testants In order to make up the tenn
porary roll. There was q clear major
lty OF the Taft delegates among the
uncontested delegates. The committee
made up the temporary roll and then
there was 4 bolt. sixty-four remaining
In the hall and twenty-five withdraw
ing thersfrom. The case of the Taft
majority was so clear that 1t Is difficult
to understand why \ contest was made.
indiana.
In Indiana the four Taft delegates at
large were elected In a state conven-
ton to which Marion county. In which
Indianapolis Is situate. was entitled to
1913 votes A primary was held in In
dianapoiis. ut which Taft polled 5000
and Roosevelt 1.40O votes. This gave
Taft 100 delegates In the state conven-
tion from Marion county. and IL they
were properly seated the control Of the
convention by q large majority was
conceded to Taft Attempt was made
to impeach the returns from Marion
county by charges Of fraud and repeat
Ing. These charges were Of q general
character. without specification except
~ to one ward out Of fifteen wards.
and then the impeaching witness ad-
mitted be could not claim fraud enough
to change the result In that ward The
national committee. upon which there
were fifteen anti-Taft men. rejected
the Roosevelt contestants and gave the
Tan delegates their seats by q unani-
nous vote. Senator Borah and Mr.
Frank B. Kellogg. both Roosevelt men,
made speeches In explaining the votes
IN which they said that the case turned
wholly o. the Marion county primary,
and - there was no evidence to Inn
peach the result certified. the title Of
the Taft delegates was clear This Is
the convention whose proceedings
called forth such loud charges Of theft
and fraud from Mr. Roosevelt
kentucky.
In Kentucky q contest was died
agalnst only three Of the four delegates