The Pickens sentinel. (Pickens, S.C.) 1911-2016, 1912-06-27
VICE IS CAUSE OF lNEBRIETY
One of Effects of Excessive Use OF
Alcohoi Is Loss of Self-Control-
Analogous to insanity.

One of Effects OF Excessive &c -
Alcohol Is Loss of self-controI-
Analogous to insanity.
In an article on "lnebriety,' pub
!ished in the Outlook, tie writer has
this to say:
"Inebriety, though disease, has
been produced by vice and leads TO
crime.
The appetites and passions should
be under the control Of the Will, ana
so guided and directed by the reason
as to promote physical, mental ana
moral health. When they are not thus
under the control Of the will and are
not thus guided by the reason, the re-
suit Is intemperance. There may De
an intemperate eating, as well as an
intemperate drinking; an intemperate
use Of coffee, as well as an intemper-
ate use Of beer or wine. Such ylelo.
ing to the appetites. such allowing OF
them to escape from the control OF
the will and the reason. .s a vice.
Gluttony Is as truly vice as drunk
enness, though not vice which pro-
duces anything like as seriously 1nlu-
rious results either to the individual
or to society. Gluttony Is a sin and
the gluttoa is sinner. He Is not
to pity himself as victim, but to con-
demn himself as sinner. This SELF
condemnation is the first step toward
reform. So drunkenness Is sin and
the drunkard is sinner. He also
Is not to pity himself as victim, but
to condemn himself as a sinner. This
self-condemnatioa in his case. as IN
the case OF the glutton. Is the first
step, and an indispensable step.
toward real reform.
"But while intemperance in all Its
forms is a sin, the disease which 1t
produces Is not a sin. Gluttony may
produce dyspepsia; dyspepsia Is not
sin, though it may be result OF sin.
Excessive drinking Of tea may, and
often does, produce serious nervous
disease, nervous disease is not sin.
though it may be result Of sin. Ex-
cessive drinking Of alcohol produces
a disease known as inebriety; that
disease Is not sin, although 1t Is al
ways result Of sin. One OF the e.
fects Of this disease Is loss Of self
control. He who is afflicted with this
In its most serious form is as unable
to control his sppetites as man af-
ficted with locomotor ata1ia is to
control his muscles. To put man
afflicted with this disease in jail until
he has recovered from the immediate
intoxication, and then send him out
again into temptations which he is
powerless to resist, Is tneXcusable
folly If man has brought insanity
upon himself by vice. We do not pun
ish the insanity. We set ourselves to
cure it. Inebriety is, in this respect.
analogous to insanity. 1t Is not to
be punished; it is to be cured. This
is none the less true because inebri-
ETY. is almost always. as insanity Is
frequently, the result Of vice. Society
should distinguish between these
three-vice, disease, crime-which 1t
often confounds. The remedy for the
vice Of intemperance is largely moral
and intellectual. or, in the broad sense
Of the term, character building The
remedy for the disease which that
vice produces Is partly moral and part
ly physical. For the crimes into which
the vice often leads the intemperate
person, society must, In self-protec-
ton, provide some form Of punish
ment.
But. in our judgment. punishment,
whether for the vice which produces
the disease or for the crime which
follows, should always be reformatory.
not vindictive, in its character. The
distinction between sin and disease Is
not easy to draw. Jesus Christ habit
ually treated sin as disease which
he had come to cure. When he was
condemned for associating with pub
ncans and sinners, he replied that
they which were whole needed not
physician, but they which were sick.
It has been we'll said that, if drunken
ness produces poverty, 1t Is equally
true that poverty produces drunken
ness. How far the boy who has
grown up in family where there Is
no control Of the apDetites, who has
inherited from the father and mother
a diseased appetite. who lives in an
atmosphere which intensifes the crav-
Ing for stimulants. whose inadequate
or improper food further intensifies
that craving-how far be Is guilty
person to be punished, how far dis
eased person to be cured, is Ques-
ton to which no definite and final an
swer can be given.
What Is true Of drunkenness Is
true Of other sins. They are partly
the result Of deliberate, Intentional
violation OF law. They are partly the
result OF ignorance, ill-breeding, bad
and almost irresistible so
cial forces Society has tried for
many years the experiment Of curing
sin by Furnishing it. 1t is high time
that society tried the experiment OF
curing crime by removing the causes
which produce it and by treating the |
criminal as a diseased or insane per-
son, to be sent to hospital for rene
dial measures.
1--WE can put our whole philosophy
On this subject in sentence. thus: It
should be the object Of society. not
to fit the punishment to the offense.
but to the offender. Or, in another
sentence, thus: The object Of all pun
Ishment should be curative, not punt
tive; its object should be to punish
crime only that 1t may cure crime.
drst in the individual. next in society.
There is no offense to which this
principle can be and should be more
and constantly applied
han to the offense OF drunkenness"