Bismarck daily tribune. [volume] (Bismarck, Dakota [N.D.]) 1881-1916, 1912-08-08
the TRUTH ABOUT !
THOSE DELEGATES
Roosevelt Contests InsNgated
! 10 Deceive the Public

AL BUT "a were ABANDONED
An Examination Of the Facts Sho~s
That the Tribunals Which Oseidsd
/ Those Contssts In Favor OF M. Taft
| Were Right In Every instanes-Tha
| Remaining 1874 Contests Ware FriveI.
Gus. and Their Prompt Abandonment
! Reflects Upon the Gsnuinsnsss and
< Validity Of the Remainder.
Washington, Aug. S.-Here are the
facts In relation to the contested seats
in the Republican national convention
1t Is q summary Of a detailed state
nent going carefully into all OF the
cases, q statement so thorough that II
takes up $50 pages Of printed matter.
This statement Is signed by Mr.. Victor
Rose water, chairman OF the former Re.
publican national committee; by Mr.. j.
ii. Devine Of Colorado, chairman Of the
committee on credentials Of the Repub.
lican national convention, and by Mr..
Charles D. Hilles. chairman Of the
present Republican national committee.
The total number Of delegates sum.
moned to the convention under its call
was LOIS. with $40 necessary to a
choice. Mr.. Taft had 561 votes on the
1rst and only ballot and was declared
the nominee. There were Instituted
against 23S Of the delegates regularly
elected for Taft contests on behalf Of
Roosevelt. These contests were avow-
sdly instigated not for the purpose Of
really securing seats in the convention.
net for the purpose Of adducing EVIL
dence which would lead any respect.
able court to entertain the contests, but
for the purpose of deceiving the public
into the belief that MI. Roosevelt had
more votes than he really had, as the
conventions and primaries were in
progress for the selection Of delegates
This Is not only necessary inference
from the character Of the contests, but
II was boldly avowed by the chief edl.
tor Of the newspapers owned by Mr..
Aunsey. who has been Mr.. Roosevelt's
chief financial and newspaper sup
porter. The 23S contests were reduced
By abandonment to seventy-four.
The very fact of these 1874 frivolous
contests itself reflects upon the genu-
ineness and validity Of the remainder.
The seventy.four delegates include six
ct large from Arizona. four at large
nom Kentucky. four at large from In.
diana, ok at large from Michigan
eight at large from Texas and eight a
large from Washington. and also two
district delegates each from the Ninth
Alabama. the Fifth Arkansas. the
Thirteenth Indiana. the Seventh.
Eighth and Eleventh Kentucky. the
Third Oklahoma, the Second Tennes.
sse and from each of nine districts. the
First, Second. Fourth. Fifth. Seventh.
Eighth. Ninth. Tenth and Fourteenth
Ct Texas.
CONTESTED DELEGATES At
LARGE.
Arizona,
In the Arizona convention there were
1inety-three votes. All the delegates
ok In number-were to be selected al
large. The counties were entitled to sc.
lect their delegates through their coun.
y committee or by primary. In one
county. Maricopa. a majority Of the
committee decided to select its dele
gates and minority to have a pn-
mary. In other counties there were
some contests. and the sttae commit.
tee, following the usage Of the national
committee. gave hearing to all con.
testants in order to make up the TEN.
porary roll. There was clear major
fly Of the Taft delegates among the
uncontested delegates. The committee
made up the temporary roll and then
there was a bolt, sixty-four remaining
In the hall and twenty-five withdraw
ing therefrom. The case of the Taft
majority was so clear that 1t is difficult
70 understand why contest was made
; Indiana.
In Indiana the four Taft delegates at
N>.~n ,,nrn oioc<o1 {n c<ofn ooDrop
ton to which Marion county, in which
Indianapolis is situate. was entitled to
128 votes. A primary was held in In.
dianapolis, at which Taft polled 5000
and Roosevelt 1,400 votes. This gave
Taft 106 delegates in the state conyen.
ition from Marion county, and If they
were properly seated the control of the
convention BY large majority was
conceded to Taft. Attempt was made
% impeach the returns from Marion
county by charges Of fraud and repeat.
ing. These charges were Of general
character. without specification except
q to one ward out Of fifteen wards,
and then the impeaching witness ad.
mitted he could not claim fraud enough
% change the result in that ward. The
national committee. upon which there
were fifteen anti-Taft men, rejected
the Roosevelt contestants and gave the
TAFT delegates their seats by a unani.
nous vote. Senator Borah and Mr.
Frank B. Kellogg, both Roosevelt men
made speeches in explaining the vote,
- which they said that the case turned