The citizen. (Frederick City, Md.) 1895-1923, 1912-09-13
CIRCUIT COURT.

=
children. This decree was passed ny the
Court on June II. The property was a
part of the estate of Mr.. loves father,
and had been left to Mr.. Lowe Jointly
with other heirs. Mr. Lowe, 1t was al
legged, had agreed that if his sister, Mrs.
lane Ann Renner, would convey her in
terest to him he would deed the properly
to his children, reserving a life interest
for himself
William A Cramer was awarded a
/ judgment for $500 on a note signed bv
! Harry {. Cover, of Thurmont, and in
dorsed by Mr. Covers sister Mrs. Nan
/ ME O.. BowleS, of Watsontown, Pa.
The jury failed TO agree in the desk
ownership suit, the vote was II toI.
Stoner, Weinberg and Harp, represent
ing Joseph Hamilton, filed demurrer to
the mar in the suit of Victor r. Cline
| against Mr.. Hamilton. Cline alleges he
made a contract with Mr.. Hamilton to
cut crossteS from tract of timber land
and because Mr.. Hamilton refuses to let
! him carry out the contract, lie has suf
Tered a loss and asks s., 600 damages.
In the case OF Lester Brown VS.. Harry
1. Hickman, which is suit for malicious
| prosecution. Messrs. Stoner and Vein
berg representing Mr.. Hickman demurr-
ed to the mar and were sustained bv the
| court. III. *. Delauter represents Brown.
In the case OF Philip Lobe and Son.
Baltimore, VS.. J. V. Summers and Son.
the court gave Messrs. Lobe verdict of
$50. 20, the amount claimed for liquor
sold the Summers firm. Mr. !. Y. Sum
merS claimed he was not party to the
partnership, but it was proven his name
was over the door OF the store and on the
delivery wagon. Jacob Rohrback repre-
scented Lobe and Son
Exceptions have been filed in court to
the ratification of the audit in the case of
Charles P. Roy and certain creditors.
"A writ has been issued and was served
by deputy sheriff Cramer, at the request
OF Daniel B. Furry, of townsville, who
sought TO obtain possession of property
bought at sherif's sale. The property
was at one time owned by David X.
Grove and when the sale was made, he
refused to VaCate The sheriff is expect |
ed 10 give Mr.. Furry the possession OF |
the property, and is empowered to use
force IN eIeCun% the tenants if necessary.
The case of Keller and Myers VS.. Mrs.
Moilie L. Buxton was called for trial. |
The suit was for $40 for commissions |
claimed upon the sale of the farm OF Mrs. /
Buxton near Jefferson, which was sold |
by Keller and Myers for $4,000. Mrs. |
Buxton made apple Ition for removal al
leging that fair trial could not be secur-
ed here. The case was moved to Mont
gomery county. Stoner and Weinberg
represent Messrs. Keller and Myers and
George A. Pearre, Jr., appears for Mrs.
Buxton.
The case of Ernest X. Harper VS.. Ed
ward Y. Goldsborough was taken up in
court before jury. Harper is the tenant
upon the farm of Major Godsborough
and is suing on a promissory note for
SIo2, given by Major Godsborough. Mr..
Goldsborough has filed a set-otf not to
receive his full share of the crops of the
farm as the agreement provided. Stoner
and Weinberg represent Mr.. Harper and
"A. ,. Brown appears for Major Colds
borough.
The Harper Goldsborough suit which
has been on trial for several days before
a jury, was rendered in favor of Harper
for SIo2.4I.
The case of Luther E. Leatherman
against John f. Baugher, is now being
tried in court before jury. The suit in
wolves the ownership of a tract of about
II acres of mountain land, located near
Lewistown. Mr.. Leatherman claims he
inherited the land from his father, and
Mr. Baugher contends he acquired it by
purchase and has paid taxes upon il
Mr. Leatherman also filed three other
suits against members of Mr.. Baugher's
family, one being against Mrs Baugher
and two against the children OF the cou-
pie trespass being alleged. Brown and
Waters represent Mr.. Leatherman, and
Messrs. Stoner and Weinberg, Mr..
Baugher.
Call at this Office and get your
Removal Certificate. Supervisor
will willingly accom-