Clearwater Republican. [volume] (Orofino, Idaho) 1912-1922, 1912-07-04
Food Law Decisions.

The United States department of ag-
riculture, has issued the following no
tices of judgments for violation Of the
Pure Food law of June 80, 1906:
No. 1904, against Prussing Bros,
Montague, Mich, for adulterating and
misbranding cider vinegar. Product
condemned, but released to claimant
upon fling bond in $780,
No. 1908, against d. J. Gregory Vine
gar Company, Richmond, Va, for adul-
iteration and misbranding vinegar.
Goods condemned and forfeited.
No. 1916, against the Harbauer Nc
Lean Co., Toledo, O., for adulteration
of tomato catsup. Goods condemned
and forfeited.
No. 1917, against six bales of coffee
in possession of the Aragon Coffee Co.,
Richmond, Va, and shipped by w. H.
Force & Co., and Mitchell Bros, New
York City. Goods condemned and for.
feited.
No. 1890, against the New Blue Grass
Canning company, Owensboro, KY, for
adulteration and misbranding of "to-
mato puree,' adulteration of "tomato
pulp" adulteration of "tomato cat
sup" Pleaded guilty and fined $25 and
costs.
No. 1928, against the Teasdale Fruit
& Net Products Company, Rogers, Ark,
for misbranding evaporated apples.
Pleaded guilty and fined $40 and costs
No. 1924, against Spiropoulos & Co.'S
talupes, San Francisco, Cal, for mis-
branding spaghetti and macaroni. Fined
$50.
No. 1925, against stillman, Weight
" 60 Il
buckwheat -four. Fined $25.
No. 1895, against A. G. Soper & Co.,
Farmingdale, N. j., for adulteration of
ketchup. Pleaded non vult, sentence
suspended.
No. 1929, against 225 cases of catsup,
packed for the Biklen Wine Grocer
Co., Burlington, la. Product condemned
and forfeited, but released to claimant
on payment of costs, and fling bond.
No. 1882, against the Brewster Co.
Goa Manufacturing Co.. Jersey City, N.
j., for adulteration and misbranding of
chocolate. Pleaded non vult, and fined
500.
No. 1, 334, against the Harbauer- Mar
lean Co., Toledo, o., for misbranding of
79S cases of tomato catsup, found in
possession of the Stone, Ordean & Wells
Co., Duluth, MINI. Product condemned
and forfeited, but ordered released to
claimants on filing bond of $1,000 and
payment of $ss costs.
No. 1888, against the Salem Canning
Co., Daretown, N. j., for adulteration
of tomato paste. Fined S..
No. 1,349, against B. T. Chandler &
Son, Chicago, ILL.,, for adulteration and
misbranding of apple cider vinegar.
Fined 800 and costs.
No. 1852, against the Frazer Pack
ing Company, Elwood, Ind, for adul.
teration of catsup. Products ordered
condemned and destroyed.
No. 1856, against the Earll Mfg. com
pany, Kansas City, Mo-, for misbranding
apple butter. Fined $50 and costs.
No. 1858, against the Jersey Pack
ing Co., Cincinnati, o., for adulteration
of catsup. Product condemned and or
dered destroyed.
No. 1868, against the Sharp Elliott
Manufacturing Co., Ell Paso, Tex, for
misbranding vinegar. Fined 500.
No. 1871, against A. E. Pearson &
Son, Lottsberg, Va, for adulteratiou
and misbranding of tomatoes. Goods
condemned, but ordered returned to
claimant upon fling bond of $4,000.
No. 1881, against the Atlas Preserv.
ing Co., Baltimore, Nd, for adultera-
ton of tomato eatsup. Fined $40.
No. 1891, against s. J. Van L.ill &
Co., Baltimore, Nd, for misbranding
preserves. e cases.) Fined SIS on
each case.
No. 1851, against the Edward Yves.
ten Tea & Spice Co., st. Louis, Mo-, for
misbranding rice. Fined 500 and costs,
A workmen s compensation law en-