Gunnison news-champion., 1912-08-30
Allun1lDnmoD
ussn lsss-s D-aa-Ess- Tsaezs,
- L 49,, . &uInu
Cmb

cnaA
Tbs prsssasy es<cksan - - 40
sspsasrr ~. lsi2. eaAv 49, 49,
a saa ne ssrrstosy e<aHesn48 -
asss,Gs - isze.. a ~A ~ s@09n1B
fos - ~ sssss ssBy pA
Thssrioss. she srtsunasao q = -
people 81 this ssGssOss1 dn1lA ]
sasAs she toliesaaG sasas9sue:
Wksl< ] sa % sas.aOr = 6h1
eosssy. ksssaS u ~ slsk hunV =
Aspss pss.gssssd - A1kao -
ssssa snsaBd AaVsa. 80 na1D
sssvsd G~aaa,oa coHaAV - - -
ssssssssx " - Es1Hssnah, GnanunA
sad SssssssssA Ossgsul ssnuhn.
end shssstss dssasG - - .
psh!ac sssvs.s - - -
pSblac scssos y hsfoss - 49,
end ohsssvsd end pshlnAsd y -
pssss. cla,n W hs - sAssa0B =
she psoPlr.
I En- pso~d Of ny sspasd - =
every voas ! CO. - ssssy SamniB
dSsias the shsss sss0s ! ssVasn11nBo
tsunnisoa eosusy 10 sxpalnaGiD =
ssassssd and no sPossO ss90y
On any.
| Nv passsioa vss slse0s slaisoV
end honestly IN ssppast q q -
plsdGss made N oss bs0ouuuis
plstform, end | hsve bsaslDd eoninn
the s~sembly fessSse of Aassa -
mary law, which k~s noe hsssaD
evident that l wss FsGAs WAn I
opposed it, l have siwsys - .
believer in the people snd ~ -
ple's Judgment on ell esssas0ao.
| sm In favor Of the folloOs4G:
A hesdless ballot
For the recall
For good rosds noe sad ksssalA8.
The election Of U. 5. sensoOO -
the people direct.
A public utility conmsssiua.
The eliminstion Of the asssaA1D
festure Of the primary Les.
While ! regret 10 have 70 Ss4ss =
certain statements made in tAs -
lie press AZ TO the matter q tks -
torial assembly held in PssbAs -
sardins the resslss and ths nS@inD-
ton | must state: Yes, The 0snni-
son delegation did vote aGsiao -
in favor Of my opponent, slsAsaGA
three Of them were for ns -
sssunch supporters nov. l q -
to the credit Of the deleGsses lsOo
Pitkin county, they csss thsis 80
nine votes for ~ and they, ~
men Of sainpsschabls cAasaCsss -
integrity, sitter mature cosssAessoiGa
they undosbtsdly acsed spOa tksis
LoDess Judgment for tAs ~ w.
terssss Of the DemocFstic Posty end
platform pledges thereof, hslissing
my record in the pest 70 be o0se &C
ceptable than my opposeats.
Another point AN forced 70 refes
TO in order 10 be plain and sOs mis-
leading, namely, the mentiosing Of
the eight hour Law l do say that
have always supported and vo>sd for
the eight hour bill, beginning in the
Fifteenth general assembly With the
j. Stevens bill No. and wbils ] was
member of the house. / never
questioned whether the bill vas .
good and effective" one. That part
| trusted to the introducer Of the
bill, who was always = member best
fitted to father such q bill end Q
labor representative. Therefose, l
need not make promises now Of what
| will do in the future. Promises
are easily made before election. In
order to prove up and clear up the
position of the two candidates before
you, take the record of the House
Journal, 1911. page $50:
House Bill No 46, by Mr.. Hurd.
"A bill for an act to regulate and
limit the hours of employment in all
underground mines, underground
workings, open cut workings, open
PIT workings, etc, etc.
''On the question, Shall II. B. No.
46, pass?'
The roll was called with the fol-
lowing result:
"leas-54 votes.
Nays votes.
Absent excused and not voting 81
One OF the seven negative votes
was cast against this bill by the
party who is now declaring that he
has always been an advocate of the
eight-hour day for all kinds Of
underground work in mines and
would work for and support any
good and effective bill that will. in
his opinion, bring such results. Al
his record will show all his work is
based on an eight-hour day.
Now, presuming the above decla-
ration is made in good faith. When
81 members voted for that eight
L. 4 IN