The copper era and Morenci leader., 1912-11-29
FINAL JUDGMENT IN SUB-CONTRACTORS
 R. R. CASE
Adjustment of Various Claims Which Grew Out of Construction of Shan- non-Arizona Railway is Finally
 Determined.

Formal judgment in the various con- solidated cases of the sub-contractors entitled B. Alexander ct. al., vs. The Shannon-Arizona Railway Company, a Corporation, ct. al., has been entered upon the minutes of the Superior Court of this county.
 The judgment of the court in full IS as follows:
 This case having been heretofore submitted on briefs, the court being now fully advised in the premises, rem ders judgment as follows, -to-wit:
 That l.. V. Hoyt and J. w. Sor reI take nothing by their action against J. s. Antonelle, O. J. Coty, G. A. Wagstaff and l.. B. Elliott, or L. " Hoyt and J. w. Sorrell be dis missed; and that the garnishmenJ sued out by l.. V. Hoyt and J. w. Sorrell against The Shannon-Arizona Railway Company, corporation, be dismissed.
 2.-That Nicholas Cole take nothing by his action against J. S. Anton elle, O. J. Coty, G. 4. Wagstaff and l.. B. Elliott, or either of them, or against The Shannon-Arizona Rail- way Company, a corporation, or against Boston Safe Deposit and Trust Company, a corporation; that the con- plaint of Nicholas Cole be dismissed; and that the garnishment sued out by Nicholas Cole against The Shannon Arizona Railway Company, corpora tion, as garnishee, be dismissed.
 3.--That judgment be entered in favor of Braulito Ruiz against F. A. Stowell for the sum of S647.0 90 with costs; that Braulito Ruiz take noth- ing by his action against Antonelle- O. J. Coty, G. A. Wagstaff and L. B Elliott, or either of them; that of the sum so adjudged in favor of Braulito Ruiz, the sum of $374 % with costs be decreed to be lien upon the property of The Shannon-Arizona Railway Com pany, corporation, described in the complaint of Braulito Ruiz; that said lien be foreclosed; and that it be de- creed that said lien is prior to any liep1=held by Boston Safe and Trust Cofnpany, corporation, against said prdperty
 4-That judgment be entered in favor of B. Alexander, Ambrosia Spezia andS Antonio Spezia against J s. Antonelle, O. J Coty, G. A. Wag- staff and L.. B. Elliott and against The Shannon-Arizona Railway Com pany, a corporation, as garnishee, for the sum of $2512. 20 with costs; that it be decreed that no part of the sum so adjudged in favor of B. Alexander, Ambrosia. Spezia and Antonio Spezia be a lien upon the property of The Shannon-Arizona Railway Company, corporation, described in the con- plaint of B. Alexander, Ambrosia Spezia and Antonio Spezia; and that B. Alexander, Ambrosia Spezia and Antonio Spezia take nothing by their action against Boston Safe Deposit and Trust Company, corporation.
 5.-That judgment be entered in favor of Giovanni (John) Mayo against J. S. Antonelle, O. J. Coty, G. A. Wagstaff and L.B. Elliott and against The Shannon-Arizona Railway Con- pany, corporation, as garnishee, for the sum of $181. % without costs; that it be decreed that no part of the sum so adjudged in favor of said Giovanni (John) Mayo be a lien upon the property of The Shannon-Arizona Railway Company, a corporation, de- scribed in the complaint of Giovanni (John) Mayo; and that Giovanni (John) Mayo take nothing by his ac tion against The Boston Safe Deposit and Trust Company, a corporation.