The enterprise. [volume] (Harlem, Mont.) 1899-1926, 1911-12-07

manufacture and sale Of chewing and
smoking tobacco and cigars. The
former one tin-foil company is d.
vided into two. one Of $S25.000 cap
ital and the other Of 100000. The
one snuff company is divided into
three companies, one with capital
OF $15.00o.00o; another with cap
ital Of $8.000,000; and third with a
capital of 100000. The licorice
companies are two, one with cap
ital Of $5.75S,00 and another with a
capital Of $2,000.000 There is. also.
the British-American Tobacco COM
pany. a British corporation, doing
business abroad with a capital OF
$26.000.000. the Porto Rican Tobac-
co company with capital Of
$1,S00,000, and the corporation Of
United Cigar Stores, with a capital
OF 100000. Under this arrange
ment each of the different kinds of
business will be distributed between
two or more companies, with a d.
vision Of the prominent brands in the
same tobacco products, so as to make
competition not only possible but
necessary. Thus the smoking tobac-
co business of the country is divided
SO that the present independent com.
pan1es have 21.39 per cent. while the
American Tobacco company will have
53.oS per cent, the Liggett and
Meyers 2O.05 per cent, the Lorillard
company 22.S2 per cent, and the
reynolds company .2.66 per cent The
stock OF the other thirteen companies
noth preferred and common, has been
taken from the defendant American
TOBACCO company and has been dis
tr1outed among its stockholders. All
covenants restricting competition have
oeen declared null and further per-
lormance of them has been enjoined.
Inc preferred stock of the different
companies has now been given vot-
ing power which was denied it under
tne old organization. The ratio of
the preferred stock to the common
was as "a to 40. This constitutes a
very decided change in the character
u the ownership and control of
each company.
In the original suit there were TWEEN.
ty-nine defendants who were charged
with being the conspirators through
whom the illegal combination acquired
and exercised its unlawful dominion.
Under the decree these defendants
will hold amounts of stock in the va
rtous distributee companies ranging
from Al per cent. as a maximum to
2Sh per cent. as a minimum, except
In the case of one small company, the
Porto Rican Tobacco company. in
which they will hold As per cent. The
twenty-nine individual defendants are
enjoined for three years from buying
any stock except from each other,
and the group is thus prevented from
extending its control during that pc
Rod. All parties to the suit. and the
new companies who are made parties.
are enjoined perpetually from in any
way effecting any combination be-
tween any of the companies in viola
ton of the statute by way of resump-
ton of the old trust. Each of the
fourteen companies Is enjoined from
acquiring stock in any of the others.
All these companies are enjoined from
having common directors or officers
or common buying or selling agents
or common offices, or lending money
to each other.
Size Of New Companies.
Objection was made by certain in
dependent tobacco companies that this
settlement was unjust because It left
companies with very large capital in
active business, and that the settle
ment that would be effective to put all
on an equality would be division OF
the capital and plant Of the trust into
small factions in amount more nearly
equal to that of each of the independ
emit companies. This contention re-
suits from a misunderstanding of the
antitrust law and it's purpose. 1t is
not intended thereby to prevent the
accumulation of large capital in bust
ness enterprises in which such a com
OlldLlOu Coll oCNu1O ACOuNCu NO0I Vi
production, sale and distribution. 1t
is directed against such an aggrega
ton of capital only when its purpose
is that of sitting competition. enhanc
ing or controlling prices and estab
fishing monopoly. If we shall have
by the decree defeated these purposes
and restored competition between the
large units into which the capital and
plant have been divided, we shall have
accomplished the useful purpose Of
the statute.
confiscatlor Not the Purpose Of the
Statute.
It is not the purpose Of the statute
to confiscate the property and capita
If the offending trusts. Methods o.
punishment by fine or Imprisonment
Of the individual offenders, by fine o.
the corporation. or by forfeiture of its
goods in transportation, are provided
but the proceeding in equity is spe
cific remedy to stop the operation O.
the trust by Injunction and prevent
tho future use of the plant and capita