Fitzgerald enterprise. (Fitzgerald, Ga.) 1895-1912, 1911-11-23


No 2O page 2McCa Company Abrams Bull and Griffin for
the plaintiff and O. Fl. Elkins for the defendant
No 22 paee 2A Mcdonald Receiver Chas Teal Jess Grant
ham for plaintiff, C. B. Teal for the defendant
A j. Mcdonald Receiver VS. D. F. Adams, Jess Grant
ham for the plaintiff and Ekins and Wall for the de-
PENDANT
THURSDAY DECEMBER 7th 1911
No. 224 page 25-Geoge Bryant M D Trammel Ekns Wall
plaintiff and A. j. Mcdonald and Jesse Gran
than for the defendant
No. 227 page 215De Trust and Co. VS. Busr Ekns Wall
for the plaintiff and Mcdonald Granham for the
defendant
No 26 2Dodd Supply Company Keller Baker Mcdonald
Grantham for the plaintiff and G. B. Teal for the
defendant.
No 28 paae 218-H Northern VS. B A. Kina Mcdonald Gran
than for the plaintiff, c. B Teal for the defendant.
No 2A mage 22OFirst National L. Waters fIayGood
Cults for plaintiff and O. H. Elkins for the defendant
PAGE 222-Consoidaed Grocery Company Early Gibbs &
Company; L. Kennedy for the plaintiff.
No $50 page 224ame Whitley Ordinary Lewis all New
born and Meeks for the plaintiff and Mcdonald &
Cranham for the defendant
No 800 page 224-Joshua Troupe vs. Dunbar ct al
No 36 PAGE 2Joshua Troupe and F. NJ Graham
Garnishee Ekins & Wall and Haygood & Cults for
the Garn.shee.
No page 24E E. Carlson VS. Hansen Mcdonald Granham
for the plaintiff and Haygood Cults for defendant
No 1874 paee 226-Trd Bank Young and Warren j. B.
Wall for the plaintiff.
No 365 MAGE 226-J K Livingston A. Domny and H. Dor
miny Ekins & Wall for the plaintiff and Mcdonald
& Grantham for the defendants
No $685. page 227G c. Knard G. A. Knard Ekns Wall and
Mcdonald & Grantham for the plaintiff L. Kennedy
and C B. Teal for the defendant,
No. page 22Wm L. Gber Clock Company VS. Clark Company
w Paulk the Plaintiff
No 3 PAGE 228eron Company Clark Company Drew
W. Paulk for the plaintiff Mcdonald & Grantham for
the defendant
FRIDAY DECEMBER 9TH, 1911
No 3 page 22Capta City Company City Drug Company
D. w Paulk for the plaintiff and Haygood and Cults
for the defendant
No 974 na6e and Perry B. Mobey
R. Mobley claimant Mcdonald and Granham for the
plaintiff and Haygood and Cults for the claimant
No. page Martin Company Mobey and Chas
Ripley claimant, Chasteen and Hnson for plaintiff
and Haygood and Cults for claimant
No page Martin Company B. Mobey diff and
Julia Mobey claimant, Chaseen and Hinson for plain
tiff, Haygood and Cults for claimant.
No page 2Cavert Mortgage and Deposit Company Mrs
Moore C B Teal for the plaintiff and Mcdonald and
Grantham the defendant
No 1856 page 232Rcker H. M Warren Mcdonald and
Grantham for the plaintiff and Elkins and Wall for
the defendant
A. Dykes ct al Mcdonald and Gran
than for the plaintiff.
No. page Bank Young and Warren Ekns
and Wall for plaintiff.
No $50 page 2Rob Russell Richard Armntrou Mcdonald and
Grantham for plaintiff and Haygood and Cuts for the
defendant
No. 39 page 2S3-Jas Whitley Lewis William Lewis New
born for plaintiff
No. $685. page 23-A Rousch Son Mary D. Trammel Clayton
Jay for the plaintiff
No. 1885, page 24Oe Lotion Garrison Mcdonald and Gran
than for plaintiff L. Kennedy for defendant
No. page 26 Livingston Chas Seay Ekns and Wal for
the defendant
No 400 mage 236W c. Brown VS. Warren Mcdonald and Gran
than for the plaintiff and Elkins and Wall for the de-
PENDANT.
W F. Rudisll R v Handley, H. Elkn for plain
tiff A. J. Mcdonald for the defendant
The FOREGOING assignment hereby approved No
will prior day assigned Cases reached the day
assigned will reached the calender November 18th
1o1 D w M WHITLEY E. WALL.
CTTYCo FUzcER AID