Norwich bulletin. [volume] (Norwich, Conn.) 1895-2011, 1911-04-19

There was nothing she didn't do e.
home. She kept the house and did
the work and didn't know why he was
cranky She had always known him
and knew he was q little odd
On July 18th he gave her 4 bad
shaking. after which he said he was
sorry and If she would not tell he
would give her q deed to half his
property.
she said he had told her that he had
more money than most of the fellows
but she had never asked him for deed
to half of the property. He bought the
place for $2,800. She didn't talk much
about his business affairs, for It she
did he seemed cranky and said his
mother was his boss.
She denied that she was thrown to
the floor on the 18th OF August. She
told of another occasion when he pulled
her on to the floor saying I'm an ath-
lete, you know. Afterwards he struck
her in the breast. She kicked at him
at that time but didn't know whei her
she hit him or not.
He has told her to go home In the
presence of her sister, and had told
her father and mother to take her
home.
Mrs. Hollowell, mother of the plain
tiff. testified that her daughter is II
and previous to her marriage was
school teacher. She is at home now.
The witness had heard the defendant
say that he was sorry he hurt her and
felt dreadfully bad She was abed at
the time. The witness told her to for
give him and she hoped he wouldn't
do it again. He said If his .sister-in-
law would keep away he thought they
would get along better. He never COM
planned of her except what he had
heard about her. She saw her legs
from the knees down. which were
bruised, and marks on her arms,
c11r v16 xar aV,6 =, neyf
Her daughter told her that her hus-
band had knocked her backward and
nearly broke her back.
At 4.S0 O'clock court adjourned for
the day, to come in this morning at 10.
and it is probable the case will occu-
by all day.
Opening Of Session.
When the court opened for the April
additional session Tuesday morning,
bench, and the first business was the
assignment of the case of p E. Hen
drick VS.. Judge Lowe and others for
today at p. M. and when the case
is called a bond for costs must be
fled
Allegations of Adultery.
The first case for Tuesday morning
was that Of Jacob Luboff vs. Minnie
Luboff of New York, the plaintiff for
merly living in Lebanon, but now in
this city. He married Minnie Peal
man in New York October IA. 1898
It is claimed she committed adultery
with Ernest Seige1 in New York and
that she deserted her husband in 1907
Counsel for the defendant desired q
continuance, as the defendant is sick
in New York. but as witnesses are
here from New York. it was agreed
that they could be heard. and the de-
tense could be heard in two weeks
Several witnesses were heard in re-
continued.
Edmundson Divorce Case.
The divorce case of Edmundson VS.
Edmundson, in which both Anna Ed
mundson of New York and Alfred E.
Edmundson of Taftville want a di-
vorce from each other, came next
both complaints alleging desertion
They were married in October, 1905
maiden name being Anna Moorehead
She went to New York and they have
not seen each other since. She was
his second wife. his first wife having
died eight years before his second
marriage. He met her in TaftvilIe
and there came time when they oc-
cupied separate rooms. He agreed tina!
he would never tell why this was and
would not tell the court. He said il
was nothing criminal and he said hi
never used her in any but gentle,
manly manner. He always provided
for her. She said that her husband be-
came cold to her and she was only the
same as a domestic in the house
Judge Wheeler took the papers. say
ing that the case was a peculiar one