The Holly chieftain., 1911-04-14
n|)Rn)BuC CONTROL
VAIL FOR REGULATION ~ WELL
~ pUOliclTV.
SAYS BOTH here 10 STAY
Frank RsssealtIsa u PvbIIs Rishte
by shs President u Western
Unisn and rsisphsns
cssNDanies.

eorporstions has come 70 stay. II
ought 10 have cone and II ought to
stay. That 10 the dat and unsquivocal
assertion Of Thsodors N. Vail. presi-
Dent Of both the American Tslsphons
and Telegraph company and the
Western Union Telegraph company.
II cane in ths form Of his annual rs-
port to the seventy thousand stock
holdsfs Of the two great corporations.
Although Mr.. Walls advocacy Of full
publicity In connection With tie Affairs
Of such concerns was well under
stood. nobody in financial circles had
anticipated 20 frank an avowal Of
full public rights in the shaping Of
their general conduct. 1t came conse-
Qusntly - . surprise. not only b.
cause Of it, novelty and squareness.
but also on account Of the unqualified
acquiescencs Of . board Of directors
comprising such eminent and conserv-
ative dnancisrs ~ Robert Winson Of
Kiddef, Peabody 4 Co. and Henry L.
Higginson Of Boston. Henry P. Davi-
son Of J. P. Morgan 4 Co.; Senator
W. Murray Crane. George r. Baer, T.
Jefferson Coolidge Jr., Norman w.
Harris, John l. Waterbury and others
President Wallis declaration Is her
aided ~ the first recognition by those
in high corporate authority OF the Jus
tice Of the demand that the public
be regarded as virtual partners in all
matters that pertain to the common
welfare. He goes directly to the
point.
Public control or regulation Of
public service corporations by perma.
nent commissions." he says, has
come and come to stay. Control, or
regulation. to be effective means pub
licity; 1t means semi-public discus
sion and consideration before action;
1t means everything which is the op.
posite Of and Inconsistent with efYec-
tive competition. Competition-as-
gressive. effective competition-means
strife. Industrial warfare: 1t means
contention; 1t oftentimes means TAX
ing advantage Of or resorting to any
means that the conscience of the CON
testants or the degree Of the enforce
ment Of the laws will permit.
Aggressive competition means
duplication of plant and investment.
The ultimate object of such competi-
ton is the possession Of the field
wholly or partially; therefore 1t
means either ultimate combination on
such basis and with such prices as
will cover past losses, or It means
loss Of return on Investment, and
eventual loss Of capital However 1t
results, all costs of aggressive, un-
controlled competition are eventually
borne, directly or indirectly, by the
public. Competition which is not ag-
gressive, presupposes cooperative &C.
ton. understandings. agreements,
which result in general uniformity or
harmony Of action, which. in fact, ID
not competition but is combination,
unstable, but for the. time effective.
When thoroughly understood It will
be found that control" will give
more Of the benefits and public ad-
vantages, which are expected to be
obtained through such ownership, and
will obtain them without the public
burden Of either the public office
holder or public debt or operating
deficit.
when through a wise and judi-
cious state control and regulation all
the advantages without any Of the
disadvantages of state ownership
are secured. state ownership is
doomed"
III Mr.. Vail is right" says Harper's
Weekly. in concise summing.up.
then 1t seems pretty plain that we
are entered upon new era in both
economics and politics. And It is high
time we did II evolution is to sup
plant revolution as an efficient force
in the development of civilization"