The Salt Lake tribune. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1890-current, 1911-09-10
ss .ney may be summed up

.,,n,ss. tney may be summed uF
||6llows: .od IN 5ecree!ng tina,
,se az be dismissed on ils !ncr'.si nc
cause ,hat the lines OF the rail-
hoalhs r,nion Pacific company were
o. lhe et,i,a with the lines OF the
eompea steamship lines OF the South
. Pscifc.. 49,, ., the railway and
that ~ the Union Pacific, or eth
nsnips were no; competitive WIN
taem railway or steamships. OF
line;i ,b,m' OF the Southern Pacifc
peny;; that the purchase by the
nolam's Railway company. or its
Fac,n ao,nnany. the oregon Short
|diSnls, :s,,,ood company, OF sufficient
,Se Southern Pacific company,
o. me same and elect It's board
nila,s ard control Its management
,n violation Of section OF inc
no. Yaiv I . 1900. and that said puT-
ma " moi result IN restraint OF trade
.n,ciIon s, or lesscnlng OF conPeu-
IA ,JniatIon OF said section.
hodIng that the purchese 3i ,h ,he
At the Southern pacIiic u! ..e
pscI6c. OF !ts subsidiary conlpsny'
6yegon Snort jiH's H'u ..-,,...,.n -.
az tend 10 monopoilze' Goi.'.'iI, M IL ~ 1
= ,hs states in violation OF inc law
hiring of Stock.
,n,,- .hat In the acquisition by the
cbo,t Line OF one-half OF toe
the san Pedro, Los Angeles q
"a ~ Railroad company tho law
| NOT violated. So. ,no
nyp,.nISc or It's subsidiary company.
.arnn short Line. OF a majority OF
esl. NJ the Northern Pacific. was
yiolntIon Of the law.
So,dnr that the purchase OF stock
San;a Fe BY the individual oe-
S,s and BY the Union facihc, was
4 violation OF the Law.
ItnH,nr that the sale OF the STOCK
! phoenix s; Eastern by the santa
4 he Southern Pacific was not
Lion OF the law. ., s<
ga Of the Southern Pacihc ana tne
Fe In northwestern CalifornEi, mo
;nrthwestern Pacific Railroad com
and the division Of the STOCK oi
rompany equally between the sh,o
<ompanies was not violation OF 'tle
+o,a,nc that the Portland & Asiatic
Lin COMPANY. the capital stock OF
IL ownad by the Oregon Railroad
rioaiion company. was neither or
q nor equipped for general traihc'
A contrary the court should nave
hs, The same was organized and
- for and engaged in general trail
romnetition with the steamship
rnnfroIlod by the Southern PACING
IA company ~
tron Railroad 6 Navigation COM
nom Portland 70 San Francisco
f5sdao1ate for any regular trafhc:
hst the saIlIngs were Irregular and
1hle. that tho court should have
lhat the dealings were regular and
n and that the company did en-
IN traffic in competition with the
IN Pacific company.
tno Chicago. Burlington & Quincy
natural and important feeder FOR
Iofendent Union Pacific. the court
hayo found that the same was an
competitor of the Union PACING
ouIy Incidentally inlerchanged busi-
With 1t.
Lake Route.
the court erred In finding that
iendant, the San Pedro. Los AnSe-
Salt Lake Railroad company. was
zei IN 1902. IL should have found
he same was publicly projected In
~ 1900 and was actually organized
IA spring OF 1901,
court further erred in holding that
MON Pacific had no other direct
zion for the Pacific coast trade:
the Southern Pacific; II should
hfld. on the contrary, that the
!. Pacific. together with It's subsid-
4 nee. owned and operated oy II.
g The Pacific coast trade.
The defendant Hartman, acting
d defendant Union Pacific Railroad
ny, 10 meet a menace occasioned
fact that the Southern Pacific
LED at Ogden, Utah, with the Den
BIO Grandc and 10 secure rella-
E permanent arrangement for Pa
coast business. first tried to pur-
tom the Southern Pacific company
Central Pacific line extending be-
Ogden and San Francisco; IL
have held that there was no evil
of such attempt.
the court erred in finding that
V|leudant Hartman having failed
rhase from the Southern Pacific
<nlral Pacific line from Ogden to
auciseo entered into negotiations
A p. Huntington. In his lifetimt
n purchase ot n large block OF the
stock OF the Southern Pacinc
~ owned by him.
tae court erred In finding that
Hartman. being unsuccessful
Y negotiations, renewed his efforts
y ure stock from Mr.. Huntington g
va devisees after mis- death IN
n nd that In that effort he had a
~er In George Gould, acting for
pld Interest.
nern Pacific Deal.
a sdlns that after an unsuccessful
procure from Mr., Hill. who
me Northern Pacific. a partial
me purchase OF the Burling-
oeiendant Hartman purchased
Union Pacific the majority of
nlai stock Of the Northern Pacific
fU 70 secure continuation OF tho
q equitable relations which had
~e existed between the Union pa
,he Burlington roads: IL should
A u Iiat the said purchase was
a. &'ItioS"e "e purpose Of controlling the
Uctwecn the Union Pacific
A optIington roads and between
'n Pacific and the Northern Pa