The Washington herald., 1911-05-13

motion for judsment orerruIed. Attorneys Nc
Kenney & Flannery-F. Z. Davis and J. 2. Laaksy.
No. 1855. stdckler VS. Pieho,d: Judsment on
verdict Attorneys z. B. Braddock and T. B.
Rsy-Maddox & GatIey.
No s3ssA Carl vs.. Metz Company; servics
quashed; motion for judgment overTuled. Attor-
neys, L. A. Bailey and W. 7. ColumbuA
No. $3.50. Beer Va United Surety Company; mo-
ton to require defendant to produce books. pa
psrs. &C.. orerrued as to paragraph A. with leave
to plaintiff to amend AFFIDAVIT granted as 10 para
graphs and c; further bill OF particulars ordered
Attorneys Brandenberg & Brandenbers-R. g. Don
aldson and A. A. Birney,
No. 6eIs2. Long vs. Moore & Hill; iudgrnent on
verdict Attnrneys John Ridout.W. J. Lamoeit
No. 5sI76. Osborne vs.. United Surety Company
further bill of particulars ordered AttorneSs Bran
denbers Brandenberg-Elis Donaldson and A.
A. Birney.
No. s5ls. Hammer vs.. sheehy; motion for refer
eucs to aIlditor orerriled. Attorneys, Archer q
Smith,. y. Houewell.
No 5oss4 United statse rel. Todd Va Harper
ct al; motion to strike out petition and EXHIBITS
granted as to exhibits A. b. c. d. r. and h. and
o.erruled as to the Petition and exhibits F. G. and
q Kins-C r. Wilson and r. 8. Hudekoper
Assignments for May Is: .
No. soesla. Wilmer vs. District Of Columbia At
tOrneys Abert-Thomas.
No. 81. Rauscher vs. Rauscher. Attorney daf-
grove & Easily -Smi,h-Thomas White.
No 100. Lord vs.. Capital Traction Company. At
torneys. williams-PerTy 4 Son and Dunlop.
No. 0l. vinson Capital Traction Company;
Attorneys. Gittinss & Chamberlin-PeFry Son and
Dunlop. ~
No. ys Kinsla vs. Same. Attorneys. Lightsoot-
Perry & Son and Dunlop.
No. g7. Kingia vs.. May. Attorneys. Gordon &
Gordon-Balderston & Halloway.
No. 800. johnson Barton. Attorney. LAMBERT
4 Yeatman-Glasae.
No. nj Rhodes vs. Barrett ATTORNEYS. Ralstou.
siddon, Rach.rdson-wilson & Bark,dale.
No 81 Helm vs. Washington Railway and Elec-
the Company. Attorneys. Dutton & MaodoA-DAf
linston.
Forrest-Darlinston-
Circuit Court No. z
JUSTICE BARNARD
No s345 pinenbaush Construction Company Va
Hurley et al. motion for Judgment continued. DC.
No. sC62. Johnston. &c. VI. Baltimore and WASH
ingtou Transit Company; motion 10 oonsounate
granted. 60 Attorneys. A. A. Birnes-s'eman q
No. s35A Dickson vs.. May: leave granted to
amend Attorneys. Ivan Heideman-W. d. HOBO
No. 5lscs. Borough Bank Of Brooklyn vs. Hender-
SON: commission ordered To issue. Attorneys. Ham,
ilton. Colbert Yerkes Hsmilton-E II. Thomas
and J. r. Daish.
motion for new trial argued and submitted. Attor-
neys. VI. " Richardson and W. L. Pollard-E. h.
Thomas
No. 5o4ol. Brucksou vs. Anaoostia and Potomac
River Railroad rusineht vi 'e'
PEAL noted Attorneys. GittinB Chamberlin-.
J. Darlington.
No S343. Sully vs.. Hammond ct al security fof
costs denied. Attorneys. Gittinss Chamoerin-
Philip Walker.
Assignments for May Is:
No. 40 Durland Washington Post COMPANY.
Attorneys Tucker, Kenyon & Ma6arland-W. j.
Lambert. .
No. "a. PEOPLES National Bank Winship ct
al. Attorneys, Mcneil & McNeill-Wison d Barks-
dale.
No. So Smith CAPITAL Traction Company.
Attoqneys Gardiner-Perry & Son and Dunlop
No So Brown vs. Golden & Co. Attorneys,
Berry Downing & Jerfords-Darlington & Johnson
No So Dixon Va Great Falls and Old Dominion
Railway Company. Attorneys, Maher MCMAHON
Lambert.
No. Sso Same IS. Same. Attorneys. same.
No. 37s. Carew vs.. Cshoon d %. Attorneys'
Archer & Smth-Shreve & Richardson.