Audubon County journal. (Exira, Iowa) 1884-1993, 1911-02-02

! iauCy' do VIII appear IRON the fol-
lowing true copy of said deed, ex-
cept as to the certificate of ac-
acknowledgement thereof, and except
that other lands were embraced in
the description thereof than those
involved in this action. KNOW ALL
MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That Asa Veach and Lucinda c..
Veach, wife, of the County of
Richardson. and State of Nebraska,
for the consideration of the sum of
Six Thousand Four Hundred Dollars
in hand paid by w. H. Hubbard OF
johnson County, and State of Iowa,
all our right, title and interest in and
to the following real estate lying
situate in the County of Audubon,
and State of Iowa, to-wit: The
North half of Section Thirty-three
(33). Township Seventy-eight (78),
Range Thirty-four (34) West; and
we hereby covenant with the said
that we hold said premises by good
and perfect title; that we have good
right and lawful authority to sell
and convey the same; that they are
free and clear from all liens and in
cumbrances whatsoever, and we
covenant to warrant and defend the
said premises against the lawful
claims of all persons whomsoever;
and the said Lucinda G. Veach re-
leases all her right of dover in and
to the above described premises.
Witness our hands this oath day of |
February,A. D. 1875. Asa veach,
Lucinda G. Veach, Gu. S. Rev. Stamp
attached.) You are also notified |
that said petition alleges that said
deed was properly acknowledged, and
duly recordered in Book e, page asa,
in the office of the county recorder
of said Audubon county. You are
also notified that said petition also
alleges that in said preparation and
execution of said instrument it was
the intention and purpose of all par
ties thereto, meaning thereby the
said Asa Veach, Lucinda G.. Veach
and w. H. Hubbard, that the words |
and name ''do hereby sell and convey
unto said w. H. Hubbard" should !
have been used and inserted between
the words iowa" and "all' in the
fore part thereof, and that the name
CIV. H. Hubbard" should have been
used and inserted between the words |
said and chat" in the fore part |
of said covenant clause thereof. |
You are also notified that said petit
ton alleges that in the month of |
March, 1885, one Matthias Klemish
executed mortgage on said premi- |
ses to defendant Farmers Loan &
Trust Co., said mortgage being of |
record in Book T, p. 434, in the office
OF said recorder; that said mortgage,
together with the debt secured there
by, has long since been paid in full;
that on Or about the year 1890. said
mortgage, Farmers Loan & Trust |
Co., by its then president, L. Par
sons, undertook to release said mort
gage of record, said attempted re-
lease being found in Book Z, page
$50, in the office of said recorder, but Il
by omission and oversight the corpo-
rate seal of said mortgage and re-
leasor was not affixed to said re-
lease; that it was the intention and
purpose of said releasor to affix such
corporate seal to said release And
you are also notified that said petit
ton alleges that subsequent to her
Joining her husband in said deed to
said w. III. Hubbard, said Lucinda G.
Veach departed this life; that in the
month of October, 1903, said Asa
Veach departed this life testate, as
resident of Richardson County, Neb-
raska, leaving him surviving defen-
dant Mary H. Veach, as his widow,
and defendants William T. veach,
Moses A. Veach, James M. Veach,
BENJAMIN F. Veach, Charles H. Veach
and Myrtle Gimbel, as his sole sur
viving children and heirs; that by
the terms and provisions of said de-
cedent's last will and testament he
devised all of his real estate to said
widow and said children; that said
defendant Mary H. Veach is still a
widow; that defendant Sarah j.
Veach is the wife of said William T.
Veach; that defendant Amelia E.
Veach is the wife of said Moses A.
Veach; that defendant Mary G. veach
is the wife of said James M. Veach;
that defendant Mary A. Veach is the
Wife of said Benjamin F. Veach; that
defendant Hattie Veach is the wife
of said Charles H. Veach; that defen-
dant William Gimbel is the husband
OF said Myrtle Gimbel; that defendant
Mary w. Hubbard is the wife of said
w. H. Hubbard. You are also mott
fled that plaintiff in said petition,
and herein, alleges that the unknown
Claimants of said premises so desert
bed as belonging absolutely to this
plaintiff, are the unknown spouses,
heirs, devisees, legatees, grantees,
assignees and legal representatives of
each and all of said other named de-
PENDANTS, and all other unknown per-
sons claiming by, through or under
any of said defendants; that the name
es and residences of said unknown
claimants are unknown to plain
| tiff, although he has sought
diligetly to learn the same;
that whatever interest said
unknown claimants have, or
claim to have, in or to said prem
ises, is derived, or claimed to be de-