The Washington herald., 1911-10-19
DAILY COURT RECORD
Supreme Court of the United States.

Supreme Court of the United States.
Present: The Chief Justice. Mr.. Justice Nc
Kenna, Mr.. Justice Holmes. Mr.. Justice Lurton.
Mr. Justice Hughes, Mr. Justice Van DeT1nter, and
Mr. Justice Lamar.
John T Harding, Of Kansas City, No; Victor B.
Stephens. Of Washington, D. G.; Byron G; Bur
bank. Of Omaha, Nebr.i Emory H. Smith. Of ForI
Worth Tex; William D. LockhArt- Of GaTs1Cn.
Tc1; Burtram G. Foster, Of Washington, u u;
Charles s. Jones' Of M1ntclair, y. J., and InomAs
Reath. Of Philadelphia, Pa. were adinf''eN
practice. :.
Herman F. Garbish; passed. to be restored 70 Ie
call under the provisions Of section oI ruie 70 ~
motion ot Mr.. Solicitor General Lehnlahn' toi '-0
plaintiff in error. ,,..,.
IN error vs. St Louis National Stock 1aruS; IN
error to the United States Circuit Court o. Ap -
peals for the Seventh circuit; Judgment amrInea p%I
stipulation on motion Of MI oolS4"Of N''-
Lehman for the plaintiff in error. -,,.
No 29 J. A SCriTen Company AppeaMnI' vs.
The Rice-Stix Dry Goods Company; motlon 70 as
miss submitted By Mr.. ?. W. Lehman ana Ar:
/ S9ar+z for the appellee in support OF the
motion and by Mr.. Arthur Won Briesen ana M.
Hans Won Briesen for the appellant In oppoSition
thereto. c..,.., ,,,,.,1 IN
.rror vs. The Louisville and Nashville HAilroao
COMPANY; motion to advance submitted by Mr:
Ellis C. Kinkead and Mr.. }. b; folaAel .e iO' '-0
defendant In sTru in support Of the motion
No yG3 Frank Kiernan, plaintiff In error vs.
the City Il Portland ct al. motion to advance 70
be heard with No. IS submitted by BY MI '~7'O"
No 667 Laura Wheeler et al, eIecutors &C
plaintiffs in error. William sohmeT. ConpttollsF s
Of the State Of New York; motion to ad'&hce SUI =,
rnitted b. Mr. Frederic D. Mchenney. IN Deh~n "a
Nj Charles P Rowland, for the plaintins IN erros
No S24. The Atlantic Transport Company. peu.
toner, vs.. The United States petition tor "rl. T
of csrtiorari to the United States Circuit Court 0
Appeals for the Second circuit, submitted oy M
Frederic D. McRsnney. in behalf Of Mr.. W. o
Montgomery, for the petitions with leave 70 @ Lne
Solicitor General to file brief Tor the respOnoei'
On or before Friday next
No III Pressed Steel Car Company, petiuoner
vs. Simplex Railway Appliance Company; IFLt,on
cult Court of Appeals for the Second clrcLt SIo @
rnitted bv MI Bertrarn G. Foster. in behalf q MI
ALFRED W. Riddle and Mr.. Clarence T. Burns
for the pettiOneTs and BY ny r.,rdsnt NJ
No 54 Norfolk and Western Railway Codn-
pany plaintiff in>]eTrur. vs. Dixie Tobacco Coh @
p&ny; motion to advance submitted by MI, LhollS a
Reath, Mr.. Theodore W Reath, and AlF. o@Inue4
Griffin for the plaintiff in error.
No 5se George T. Simpson ct al appellants
VS. David C. Shepard; .,,....
No Co., George T. Simpson et al. apTf!!ahLs'
Va Emma & Kennedy ct al. executors &C et A. :
and
No col. George T. Simpson ct al. aPPellants
vs. William shiIlaber; leave granted to Mr.. I'd
nound { Durmert TO file brief here as amicuS
curiae on motion Of Mr.. Frederick >. I94et
in that behalf.
4.
York com7lainants The State Of New jersey et
al; motion for ar order extending time tG me
taking uf testimony herein submitted by MI. VIII
lam J. O'SuvaH, for the comTi2inants IN SupDI'
Of the motion and by Mr.. Edmund Wilson, Ar.
Robert II McCarter. and Mr.. Joseph C0uIt. toE
the defendants in opposition thereto
No 7s9 The City Of New York. petitioner. vs..
The United States: petitioner fer a wit Of Ger
tiorari TO the United States Circuit Court OF AT-
rcals for the Second circuit. submitted by Mr.
William J. O'Sullivan- in behalf q Mr.. Terence
Fsr1a F1- he T,PriTiU1er ard Nv Mr.. Solicitor
General Lehman fer the respondent
No. 81. David Lupton Sons COMPANY plain
tifs in error vs. The Automobile Club Of Amer
ica: motion to dismiss affirm submitted by Mr..
William w Miles for the defendant in error in
support Of the motion. and By MI. William Ford
tyson. for the plaintiff in error in opposition
No. IS. The Interstate Commerce Commission.
appellant. Harry J. Dtfenbaugh. Ct al;
No, 2S6. The Interstate Commerce Commission
appellant vs. F. II. Peavey and Company ct a.;
No. x. Union Pacific Railroad Company. sp-
prellant. F. H. PeaTey and COMPANY ct al: ar
Mr. John Barton Payne tn- tie =Ppellees, by Mr.
Maxwell EvaTs for the Union Pacific Railroad
Company. and concluded ty MI Solicitor Gen
eral Lehman for the Interstate Commerce Com
Nos. s53 and 81. Union Pacific Railroad Com
Pany. plaintiff in error, vs. The UPdike Grain
Ncs. S5 and 356 Union Pacific Railroad Com
Tany. plaintiff in error, vs. Cpdike Grain Com
pGny: arTIed BY NJ. Maxwell bvaTs for the
plaintiff in crrrr and BY Mr.. Edward P. Smith
for the defendants in error.
No 45I. The Interstate Commerce Commission
appellant vs- Union Pacific Railroad Company. ct
10 452 The Interstate Commerce Commission
appellant. IS. Northern Pacific Railway COMPANY
Ct al. and
No. 453. The Interstate Commerce Commission,
appellant vs.. The Great Northern Railway Com
pany ct al: argument commenced by Mr.. Luther
N. Walter flr the appellant
Adjourned until to-day at p O'Clock.
The day czlI for Thursday. OC,ober l9 will be as
follows: Nos. 81 land 452 and 453l. 40 463 3l
land 22J. il3 land 4l4. $50 80, AS. $50, A. 565
5Ss, and 593