The Bemidji daily pioneer. [volume] (Bemidji, Minn.) 1904-1971, 1911-08-11

giOus disease and on the contention
that it Is not contracted to any great
extent through infected milk or even
by the using the drinking cups that
consumptives use or through the ''spit-
ting nuisance" Its spread is through
the infection of the habitation. Here
is one of his parallels:
Brown had moved in the month Of
May into a house in another part of
the town where he had always lived.
By fall be had contracted tuberculosis
It was discovered later that several
different families who had occupied
this same house in succession had lost
several members from tuberculosis. No
attempt had ever been made to disin-
feet the house. Brown went to a far
western state, pitched his tent on a
certain spot, and never made any
change from that one spot until his
death. Note that fact. AS a result
the soil over which he slept night
after night became saturated with the
accumulated germs which he expelled
in coughing, so that he was continually
at night rebreathing into his system
the very seeds" which cause the dis
ease. He was repoisoning himself
nightly and didn't know it. His sys-
TEN would have been able to throw off
the original germ poison" which it
contracted. but it was not strong
enough to withstand a new dose Of
the poison every night. Had he chang
ed the location of his tent daily he
could have slept each night in an at
mosphere practically germ free.
Jones is another victim. He goes to
the same state. He has an idea that
he can get along without any tent and
sleeps with only the stars above, rolled
up in his blanket. He naturally moves
from place to place. each day sleeping
on new and different ground each
night. He ends by being cured
Smith has the disease and goes to
the west. He feels and looks in per-
feet health long before a year Is gone
he returns home, satisfied that be is
cured in less than four months be is
agata in the tenacious clutches of the
dlSease.
There is a lesson in this The open
air treatment is all right, but it must
be carried out by right methods. All
early cases OF consumption which
have failed to- recover by outdoor
treatment must lay the blame to
faulty treatment. Jones, who recover
ed, you will remember. did change his
location every day, having no tent to
bother him. and in doing so avoided
the fatal mistake of Brown.
How about Smith? The case Of
Smith is of the greatest Importance.
He had recovered, you will remember,
and returned to his home feeling fine
back to what? TO the very same
plague ridden room in which he had
first contracted the disease-a room
reeking with tubercular germ life and
which had been occupied. it was
learned later, by five different con-
sumptives at various times. The dis
ease got hold on him second time
for the simple reason that he came
back to the original source of his dis
ease. He should have sought new
ularly the room he occupied. should
have been disinfected before being &C.
cupied by him or any one else. These
three cases cited are but typical in
stances. There are thousands upon
thousands of Browns. Joneses and
Smiths living and dying this very day
whose story. if told in it's true light,
would match exactly the simple but
pathetic history of these three men.
The thing that the doctor brings out
is that consumption must be prevented
rather than cured: that prevention is
easy and cheap and lies in disinfection.
This, in the case of the consumptive's
quarters. he insists. should be at least
once a week. The formula is simple:
'Fumigate every room in the house
with a vapor given of by heating
formaldehyde; wash all the floors,
windows and woodwork with mild So
lutions Of corrosive sublimate and
water" Fresh air, either at home or
elsewhere. he establishes, is in itself
insufficient. ..>.
He reaches the conclusion that the
very existence of the hope of a ''cure"
has been responsible for increase of
the disease. He urges people to fee
from consumption by killing it in the
germ that turks in house or ground.
----------
Think all you speak, but speak not