Norwich bulletin., 1911-10-07
cIvoRCES AND OTHER
 SUPERIOR COURT BUSINESS.
Long Session at New London-Jury to
 Be Summoned in for the 17th


 There was much business on the short calendar list in the superior court in New London on Friday. Six uf the matters were postponed.
 In the case of Whitney vs. Whitney, on d motion for allowance to defend, t.e sum of s35 was allowed.
 X motion was argued that the case ef Carpenter vs. Paracenti ct al be re- stored to the docket, and the judge tooiS the papars.
 Headings 6ere ordered in two weeks in the case t6 Weinstein vs- Cohen on motion for default for failure to plead.
 on a motion for default for failure to fife req sons for appeal, pleadings were ordered in two weeks in the case of Burdick ct al, appeal from probate.
 In the suit of Heath vs. Heath a re- ply is to be filed and the order that the parties interplead was granted.
 An order that the defendant file spe- clay bail, as asked for in the plaintiffs molten in the case Of Bland vs. Craney was granted and S1,e00 is ordered in three weeks if the answer is filed in the same time.
 An allowance to defend of s35 was allowed in the case of Finnegan vs. Finnegan and ordered in two weeks.
 An answer in two weeks was order ed in the case of Fisher vS. Farrell.
 The petition of Maud B. Reuter- for 8 change of name was argued and the judge took the papers. as he did in the case Of Minard vs. The Royal Lin- ment.
 Two weeks were allowed for plead ings in the case of Goiswold, admx., vs. the New Haven road.
 In the case of Hendrick vs. White 8 motion to expunge and the argument .Of d-r1l ah9F1 and the judge took the papers.
 A demurrer was argued in the case of Davis vs. Manwaring, admr, appeal from probate, and the judge took the papers.
 Mrs. iGnevra Karoli of Norwich was allowed slimony of S7.50 from her husband, Henry P. Karoli until the divorce suit she has begun against him is ended. The payment of alimony is to date from Sept. 9.
 Mrs. Ksroh testified in the court of her need of money to support herself while seeking divorce from her hus- band She is seeking the decree on the ground of cruelty.
 own behalf was asked by Attorney Shields. counsel for MT. Karoli, if she had not on one occasion hit her hus- band ever es1e head with a stick At torney Perkins for Mrs. Karoli object ed and Judge Reed sustained the ob- jeotson, telling the lawyers to confine themselves to the matter under discus sion and not go into the details of the ease.
 Mrs. Bessie Bolton King of New London was divorced from Joseph Kins. The ground was desertion. Mrs. King was given the custody of the on- 1y child.
 Ida M. Gsatty ex Mystic was given decree from Clyde J. Batty on the sTound of desertions and she was al- lowed to change her name. The Ius- band resides in Mystic also. @
 Edith M Elkins of New London was given a. divorce from Frededick $. FL kins. The ground. was cruelty. Mrs. Elkjns was given custody of two year cid daughter.
 William H. ThudHnan of Norwich was given divorce from Mary E. Thurman Desertion was the ground.
 The dtvorcs suits of Fredrequia A. Stellenwerf vs. Charles A. Stellenwerf and Carrie E. Bitgood vs. Abraham L. Bftgood were postponed a week.
 On the grounds of desertion, Charles W. Martin was given a divorce from Mary l.. Martin. The desertion took place Sept. 10. 1905.
 The divorce case of Henry W. Gard ner vs Mary E. Gardner was heard and continued for proof of service
 A jury will be drawn in New Lon don Tuesday morning at 10 o'clock and will be summoned in for the 17th.
 Cases Assigned.
 Tn following cases were assigned for trial at New London: @I
 Tuesday. Oct. 10-Ryan vs. Cooney Geer vS. AckerS.
 Wednesday, Oct. 1l-Mercer vs. town of Montville, Hankin ys. Hanlkin, Case, admr vs. F'ahey
 Thursday, Oct. 12-Walton vs. Smith, Daly vs. Norwich Savings society.
 That the New London lawyers are not anxious to try their cases is evil denced by the number of Norwich at torneys appearing in the cases assign ed. Tn the first cases assigned for Tuesday and Thursday, New London lawyers appear on both sides. with Norwich attorney assisting the plain tiff in the Thursday case. A New London firm appears for the defendant in the second case Tuesday. but the counsel in the other cases on both sides are from this city