The Richmond Virginian. (Richmond, Va.) 1910-1920, 1911-06-30

tbotguFAay ae,4=s.fs lire primary
t.l3 H.. -.t..'......-. ,..5..., .
ii"'t
t h'a4apR +nts aHt+-f4slHH district
"at "fH,tnel lrrdefs ADOPTED tiie fel
in" tNr rHsHi.fiis# TT 2 uH@ting htla
Pr tl" 'natirfJ4 hHtri yesterday af-
WV "I.
itefojf i best ISL slew af the
'euY reported EfeE #3tritioa In iho
ptt3atE r4tftiua HaEa tuaa 2s. it is the
,P4"'"N ri t4is meeting that Gre Same
r." 't'~t'I tt7t aN fHfiJ ave may ne
"'.i'''V fApea.r"f ~ i5s shh-e"mntttee
{ lftA " ..f 8t'tt#tf5tHH
w. committee appointed under
,a' ''F'ittt"a Het after tH' toh-
"l5'. .lHt1 ~i'd or, t1"d &" con
ME- ''''"'''s' reg "t =" i'@t,'' can
80, "',' arc
t,.--.. -,'.,sS.
80, .4 '-oe' y ~ 'i''
tr.- ..,4..=s55#
dsnt,. ,,,.s55.ft5f -. -
~. ,,..ug a. t55s,s- T.. - -
trr,.ev afternoon 44f.t,.fl.le4 a COM
tnittep "a serat, g., .s.,esI.te,. the Idols.
blHv Of curfezft,5a I'M el+rilnn una
ute committee dUciaeu 70 mo notice
uf contest
Tho specjal committee carefully
went over the statements made ~
their representatives. and attorneys
and asreea ta contest the nomination
of 4li fusion candidates for the gen
cfAl offices and those who have re-
ccivea maiaritiea FOR minor positions,
u IL can be proven that Illegal votes
were cast for them.
Complete lnoiiolai returns festrf-
Gay snow liiat NlhuuBhpy J.. " i4Son.
suPP"i tea ~ the itthloh'stS tof ciEFh
VI w" county Court mas majority
or Two votes over -'a ''aieulan, me
s.la'sl ',''Gt stital'iaat no "'.1u' u
~ ',E'5l ~ '"' I'M - l%9
~ ~ ~ ttta' N',tA''t ,i'''' '''s i
1,,,. ,13 ~ - ,,ll,
49,. 80 ~, ,.s,,.{t1t ~
{t-it, ~, -. 49, ,+tslt r. ~,
r,,,,tI ~, ,.,t... ,,f ,.,,,,,sa tb,.,, ,,vf.
h9slr.r mis- tr4,5fctif,p. ,,non no his
.c,4rrt of error. Ia fVo precincts in
which fb,.{ Qt#st,s.et "a 5Iists,tr has been
t,Ad, ia, tNe risnrt
Primary not Fraudulent.
Leaders Of the auti-fasiou cause arc
not claiming that the entire primary
was fraudulent. hn1 seem confident
that they viii he able TO prove The
charges that they VIII make Wn4l the
vote is oiIig lais e.stYassed by the
county Democratic executive commit
tre, which canE eoes va t1T county en-
cuit court room III Portsmouth TO-
ua%.
Attorneys aHdS' "lta Na'.heIs
Wn9 lPlfe+thtfa We @tIdlsilV'utN a'
every tteele.l - i ~ s9tAi.'y a'g
pV'teu ~ "tt}-tH a. ~ $500 ~.
t',ti y ~, - 81, ~ ,,,,,,t
V.t,.'7 -, ,@,.,',3,, diat,.i,,fs
1t - .I-..=i.,r5. .,,1 incorrect
ff1lsfou leaders did NOT seem ,lated
oy.r fheif victory. several of them
recording the nomination Of THOR
,,,naida,gs ~ 4 iast reward for thc[r
hard work during tne campaign.
WhfIs M, did MOI Issue any state
mems II vas mttmatea by those In
thefr confidence that the straight
out victory AZ Gharehtand, which has
always boom stronghold OF the anti
fusionlsts WHl he contested, and that
me yote from his precinct will &c
carefully gone over at inc meeting OF
the county committee to-day.
The overwhelming majority of the
"antls" al Churehland. which WAS 81
to 1. was the gratifying feature Of
tho primary from the standpoint of
me reform leaders and their friends
in that urerinet
Tho .'nntis" also scanned pleased
o,at Inc. baa .4et+tad No members
- tba toarj ~ gt,,,er>,sara fhonpb
- f'u -. Observation-Disclosures nn a.
bhS Nt NiA''t ttSfft3l'Ft ~ ~ - 49,