New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1911-07-14

brought against his wife. and Justice Page
signed the order YESTERDAY leaving Mrs
Noller the undisputed owner ~ the two
properties.
Follows Another Romance.
The announcement OF the marriage of
Charles -. Mole. was within a week after
another romance ia his family IN which
his nephew, John Moler. ir. figured The
Young man ran away TO Greenwich, Conn,
and was married 80 Daisy Baker, an
actress In tho application made by the
elder Mrs Noller for the marriage license.
she said she was housekeeper at No. go
Madison avenue. which was the home and
is still the home OF Noller II Is one Of the
two houses he gave his wife. Mrs. Moller
described herself as q native of Birnne
ham, England and said her fathers name
was Michael Furey Soon after the mar
rage the couple went TO Europe
Moller vas married "a his first wife In
1856. and has one son, Charles g. Moller,
jr. who lives ar No 81 East 18Th street
Moller first met Mrs. Brennan. who was
said TO be q widow. in 1904. when she was
a tenant in the house, No. PIP Madison
avenue which Moler owned, and which Is
the other Of the two houses the old man
decided TO her. The transfers were made
in October. 1910. two months after the
marriage Tbs transfer was witnessed by
Thomas " Butts and Walter Z. Winning,
lawyers.
Moller said IN his complaint in the suit
70 get back the properties that h retired
from business thrty-tvo years ago, and had
been for many years in i'll health and en-
feebled In that condition he said he was
susceptible to the influence Of others, es-
pecially in matters regarding his property
and business affairs His wife took ad-
vantage Of this condition, Moller asserted.
Being an invalid, he was unable to resist
her influence Noler said his wife soon
learned that he was easily Influenced, and
with fraudulent designs took advantage Of
his physical infirnlity ana credulity with
the determination 70 get his property
Disappeared for a lime,
II was about the same time or shortly
after his marriage. when Noller was sick az
his home that his son Charles c. Moller,
tr., dismissed the physicians ana nurses at
tending his father and engaged others in
their places Noler feared that this move
son and other members Of his family 10
have him committed as an incompetent and
restrained Of his liberty He therefore
consulted counsel Mollsr was anxious 70
transfer all his property 70 his wife. bp.
he was advised against this step. The law
yers who had the deeds in charge held them
until Mollers health improved. when he
recorded them in the Registers Office. This
was on April q Then Mollsr disappeared
for short time. and his wife did not
know where he was During this absence
the papers in the suit for the restoration Of
the property were served on her. In dire
distress and not knowing whom 70 turn r.
shs consulted Butts and Winning. She
learned thar the real purpose Of the suit was
10 attack her marriage 70 Moller and 70
have II annulled There was hint In tho
action that az the time she married the old
man she had 2 husband living. One point in
the proceeding that Is unexplained is that
the action was brought against Jane
sonner, also known as Jane Moller"
As 10 the s3s 600 in bonds, they were in
safe deposit vault 70 which she and
Moller had access She was advised 70
place them IN 2 vault 70 which her husband
did not have access
John +. Cowsn former Aqueduct Com
missioner who had known Mrs Moller for
about five years. became associated with
Winning in her case Winning drew up her
answer 70 her husbands suit and Cowan
anproved r. While there was ostensibly
involved the two properties. II really con-
cerned all the property that Mrs Moller
would become entitled 10 as the wife 81
Moller, amounting TO several hundred thou
sa nd dollars
While Mrs. Moller vas getting ready 70
defend her rights. there came the meeting
between Moller and his wife and the settle
ment Of their differences. Mrs. Moller did
not surrender anything and the resumption