Bismarck daily tribune. [volume] (Bismarck, Dakota [N.D.]) 1881-1916, 1911-05-03
TRACY BANGS MAKES ANELOOUENI Plea
CONTINUED From Page Eleven. }

TRACY BANGS MAKES NEL0QUEN1 PLEA
Continued From Page Eeven2
attention of the since they
the evidence leaving the McClory with no
think briefs submitted by either
requested decision There is another
morning, where it i'm,
blame the blame
persons believe, generally blame of that
that the attorneys the for not pushing forward
asked brief submitted made they
go testimony and walk
business isn't properly attended to-
specification Ramsey
County that at the close
the evidence time for the brief the case that
represented it,
submitted
practically abandoned by the attorneys.
81 calls attention the evidence in this
of Mckee against Haley That tried &C.
1sos decided December 1910
McKeeaey that friend Hancock
Cown frantica cutching the his
floor rolling out of his
dbng drunk think Hancock said drivelng
thought him
didn't notice anything
peculiar trying before
hadn't noticed anything about him.
attorneys
possibly flushed and might have ben and possibly he did
close his eyes during
Hancock, the
gby Cowan rolling around in his chair
and would have he arms,
bling drunk
just think a Fred Cuhbert iar How
many you yes? geyheaded
liar? vote yes Is Frye liar? Is
other Cowan? this other who Cowan
inst after Tint and didn't notice ANYTHING wrong with him until he had
while think he didn't his questions
wanted him None this thing that Hancock
Hancock train and jumped
You
will excused by the
snkler fixed
Mncer fixed the Hancock story? And echo
who? the funniest things the most humor
things conceive bring witness here pull
disgrace and drag his family after him is thing that
brings Joy to the hearts Of some people But thou G
the point where delight eecing misery
But let return to the delayed cases.
This agreed
particular time specified and
look they found ambiguous they
couldn't they presented
That his testimony They presented
the because s ambiguous, and the testimony
fixed they couldn't make head tail to and they
No filed either sde Mr. McClory tells
abandoning the case
through with testimony Now might be argued that
this that Judge
bench that this and
do not forget that in trial OF court case under the beau
hful statute have in this state the Judge nsurehead
He decide that is raised during the trial. and he
question
that asked and all into the record The judge
simply sits there the counsel they get ouble that
then,
different objections made during the trial. but
the court has nothing do with the
appears.
Plow against stenseh
cuthb the attorney that
he prepared and submitted
testimony before and
a verdict then he from the
that briefs to be submitted and
He that their side Mddaush cuh
submitted by the defendant Mr.
called defense the matter
Anderson appeared
they did decision
coming with
decision; simply left to drift by themselves.
Mcintosh We haven't anything
articles
specification Beck against Nc
nyre Mcintyre
explanation anything about it.
specification 49, Nelson against Arnold This
which
to show cause came
prejudice fled 1910
engineer be obtained look the
waiting this engineer adavit
dce vas 6led md the out Of his hands.
In Ruben delay and ten
testimony on that case except simply the ~