New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1911-08-11
SAYS WOMAN WON HIM
Wife Asks Alleged Enchantress
for $4,000 Damages.
ALSO SUES HER HUSBAND
Plaintiff Deferred Action Until
All Hope of Her Adams Re
turn Had Fled.

Mrs Annie Zimmerman. Of No. Man
haitian avenue has brought suit in the ou-
preme Court for $4,000 against Mrs. CARA
r. Konselran. of No. Is West l22d street
for the alleged alienation OF the plainun
husband Not that Mrs. zimmerman val
ues her husband. Adam Zimmerman AT
that figure. but she maintained she hau
suffered 10 that extent by the alleged ac'
of Mrs Konseman.
The circumstances Of this action are an
ferent from those in many actions Of the
kind. because the Zimmerman and konsel-
man families are related by marriage 'i'e
PLAINTIFFS daughter being married TO the
defendants son.
Mrs. Zimmerman said she and her nus
band were married I'm 1851. ana tna' ""'''
1909 they lived happily together mat ""S
when Mrs Konseman appeared 0" wy
scene In an affidavit submitted ny t"e
plaintiff she says the defendant is MAJ
ried woman. living with her husband. who
Is a decorating contractor. Hirhhe''.'"" -
tho manager Of several restaurants In l%9
Mrs Zimmerman said her daughler' WI,
Cornelia Charlotte zimmerman MAJ ''U
the son o. the defendant The plainul anu
her husband were opposed to the hlarr'ae
because they did not believe their odus '.ei
ought 10 marry into the Konselman lai'i'
Their principal aversion, declared Mrs'
Zimmerman. was TO Mrs. konselmah' Hlih-
norman was even more opposed TO the
marriage than his wife. But the daugH'er
married Young KOnselman, and TOT Some
r,,e thereafter was estranged from her
,s,,lv The usual reconciliation came
about bu, frs, the new Mrs. konseiman
made her peace with her mother anu II
vac some time later that zimmerman oe-
came reConciled.
The voung couple lived with konseiman
mother and father. Following the recon,
Citation Mr.. and Mrs Zimmerman cd''eo
q, The Konselman home. As Mrs. Hiih'iiei
man said. they merely tolerated 'he we
fendant" when they met. Next MIs "'i,,
norman said her husband fell In love WIN
Mrs Eonselmau. the same woman ""o'.
son he did not want as son-lh-la". '"'
Me- Konselman "maliciously urea aho
onticed" him from his wife. declared MIS-
Zimmerman. 10
The n,aintiff said she was loath 10 oe
ueve that this association had been 10Y i,'eu
hut she was compelled to. for she iireu d,
Great expense thirty detectives VINO ,oi'
her about the "scandalous conduct VI ~"
husband Thus she found out ABOUT Auaii
Zimmerman from TO L.
Tho wife said she had such proof tha
bor Adam had been enthralled by MIS-
Korsalr,an that it was just matter o.
ev,ry tho damages. She was reluctant u
tr,rg the suit. and did so only as las
r.sort when she saw her home WrecAe,
and lost her last hope that Adah "oui'
come hack 10 his Garden of Eden
Mrs Konselman has put in genera ue
nial Of the allegations of the plain'i1' ahC
-, ber annlication Justice Bischof ordered
Mrs Zimmerman yesterday 10 furmsh lH'
defendant with a bill of particulars as u
pben how and where the alienation 'oof
,,,c. That much for the alienation suit
Mrs Zimmerman also is suing Zlnmer
man. She asks a separation rum nm
She alleged I'm that action that ne "d'
cruel IN her. and on one occasion thre"
,,ifs a., her To social functions at hei
home said Mrs zimmerman, her husband
,sea IA invite Mrs Konselman ana mug
and kiss her in the presence OF bis "he'
Also he used in addressing the deiehdah
in the other action such endearins terms
as the original Adam never even thoueh'
- 1,heu TOO. she says, he lavished none!
oo Mrs konseimans wardrobe, ahothei
chino which the first man never did loi
Eve, AMI lastly Zimmerman used TO conn
home only to dress. Adam never uiu '"''
either.