The Birmingham age-herald., 1911-07-28
COMPROMISE WOOL BILL
 PASSES SENATE, 43 TO S2
CONTINUED FROM PAGE D

ferees would get together, he believed, in a few days.
 The important features of the new LaFollette bill which the Senate passed this afternoon, compared with the present law and the Underwood House bill are shown in the follow ing:
 Raw wool, first class: Wool on skins, present law. B.. T per cent ad valorem; Underwood 20 per cent; LaFollette, 30 per cent
 Wool not on skins: Present law, E.24 per cent; Underwood, 20 per cent; La Toilette, B per cent Raw wool, second class: Present law, A 9S per cent; Underwood 20 per cent; LaFollette, 10 per cent. Top waste, etc.: Present law, 9S 93 per cent; Underwood. 20 per cent; LaFollette. 25 per cent.
 cent; Underwood, 20 per cent; LaFollette, 25 per cent.
 Woolen rugs, mungo, etc.: Present law, 8 40 per cent: Underwood 20 per cent; LaFollette. 25 per cent. Bombed tops: Present law, III per cent; Underwood 25 per cent; LaFollette. 40 per cent.
 derwood, 30 per cent; LaFollette, 45 per cent.
 Blankets and hannels: Present law, S5. 42 per cent Underwood, 30 per cent; La Toilette. 55 per cent Clothes, dress goods, fabrics and woolen cloths: Present law, 96.74 per cent; Un- derwood, 45 per cent; LaFolette, 5 per cent.
 Carpets: Present law, 50 per cent; Un- derwood, 9 per cent; LaFollette, B per cent.
 Mats and rugs: Present law, 62.95 per cent; Underwood, 50 per cent; LaFollette, | B per cent The Vote | The vote on the final passage of the compromise bill was, for the bill Republicans-Bourne, Oregon: Bris- tow, Kansas; Brown, Nebraska; Clapp and Nelson, Minnesota; Crawford. South Dakota; Cummins and Kenyon, Iowa; Gronna and McCumber North Dakota; LaFollette, Wisconsin; Poindexter, Washington; Works. California. Democrats-Bacon. Georgia; Bailey, Texas; Bankhead and Johnston, Ala bama; Bryan and Fletcher, Florida; Chamberlain, Oregon; Chiffon and Wat son, West Virginia; Clark and Davis, Arkansas; Foster and Thornton, Louisi- ana; Gore and Owen Oklahoma; Hitch cock. Nebraska; Johnson, Maine; Kern and Shivley, Indiana; Martin and Swan son. Virginia; Maritime New York; Myers, Montana; Newlands, Nevada; O'Gorman New York; Overman and Simmons, North Carolina; Paynter, Kentucky; Pomerene Ohio Reed and Stone. Missouri; Smith, Maryland; Smith, South Carolina; Taylor, Tennes- see; Williams, Mississippi.
 Against the bill:
 Republicans-Borah and Hepburn, Idaho; Bradley, Kentucky; Brandegee and Mclean, Connecticut; Briggs, New Jersey; Burnham, New Hampshire: Bur ton, Ohio Clark and Warren, Wyom- | ing; Crane and Lorge Massachusetts; Cullom and Lorimer, Illinois; Curtis, Kansas Dixon. Montana; Gamble, South Dakota, Guggenheim Colorado; Jones, | Washington Lippitt and Westmore, Rhode Island; Nixon, Nevada, Oliver | and Penrose, Pennsylvania; Page, Yer mont, Perkins, California: Richardson, | Delaware; Root. New York; Smith and | Townsend, Michigan; Smoot, Utan; Stephenson. Wisconsin.
 Absent-Dupont Delaware; Frye,
 Maine; Gallinger, New Hampshire; Lea,
 Tennessee; Percy, Mississippi; Suther-
 land, Utah; Tillman, South Carolina 1 Present and not voting Cbecause
 paired with absentees) 1cuiberson, Texas; Dillingham;, Vermont; Rayner Maryland.
 The LaFollette substitute, as 1t passed
 the Senate differed in every particular from the House bill. This will throw
 every paragraph of the two bills Into conference
 | Under the circumstances the regulars cannot afford to go into the conference' said Senators Penrose and Smoot in uni son. less than five minutes after tn, action of the Senate was announced
 "It is combination bill, in which W, have no part and we shall decline to b, In any respect parties to the negotia tions with the House.
 LaFOllette's Speech
 In offering amendments proposi T, | reductions in the duties on woolel goods, Senator IaFol1ette tood the DO sition if the reductions contemplate
 were adopted they would compensas.