Bismarck daily tribune. [volume] (Bismarck, Dakota [N.D.]) 1881-1916, 1911-05-03


this longer judicial
Klgore Smith,
specification clerk has said"
of charge
that tried 1906 and no de-
before this court the fact
the should
reasonable time but are vo
that not the the purpor
guilty guilty OF the ohense which JUS
fy saying longer fit to sit the
district and always be
present and every
specification alone but what
In going these facts
you retain that matter in your mind
Now these delayed know they
but do know of any better
the forenoon The next case that OF
Powell that we nave
Mddaugh Traynor McClo the secretary of state Mid
aaugh you briefs prepared by him and
that decided far he knows but ne doesn't
know whether transcript mas been secured OF no' 80 +h
believe Middaugh only he spoke to the
Judge him findings that Paddy Norton
him. Now Mccoy was witness tnat case anu ne %
given you He after the was tried "
That the agreement was was TO De
breed and argued either side and that
they the court nmated that any
one was entitled but Largen went
the he had done thus
far practically dropped the matter You will remember wnat
remember recalling the testimony that Lar
gent owed Norton agent for the
owned piece of land on which
he agreed to sell 1t to the
small sum- think ooo or $ooo anu release
of Harvester Mr. Norton
secured deed himself secured deed
that property to his sister, fo"e
had negotiated to buy the pro-
it, commenced this action against
the against Norton compel Nor
ton through the international Harvester COM
him. and the International Harvester company
to compel the transfer Lagent had recev
that the deed had been 3D.
the part Norton and that
McC Judge CoUan ntmaed at the
close of the relief Largen and Judge
Cowan may and he has made rulings
with him in regard to times gone o put
nmation the time of that trial showed MS keen
equity nothing else Now, Mr. Norton comes on
nterec into this something on which
claim Cowan acting in fraud OF some
ones rights and Norton says went see o"an ana sao %
giving this and Cowan says tuh tus don't
WE'LL gentlemen have Judge co"an for
thirty days. heard him talk have seen
him the hotel know him and
you isn't this room
anybody when they
tush uh Why, 1t is the most absurd rot
ever heard grown snkler said in his
that passed Judge cowas
face that Snkler saw?
sinker that side of the ROOM
Norton in the witness box between MIN ana Co"a
and the revengefu Paddy Norton
Deep that snke couldn't look through as far
remember what he said when demand was made
Norton
didn't give you the find
ngs fact and Judge "You
his breath Did
what he said when he sat
there on the witness stand
hasn't the manhood
he out Of this court Taking
Cowans position trial before this
Senate would
richly he said them in Cowans
about hate the Cowan about
ans simply
thing again Dirty DEAL Look back the
the
still existence still hanging his
possibly $oo have forgotten which, they
through the Norton
deal? senators to look back
ask senators to look at
the
hatred? whose
deal? Don't know? Don't know?
anywhere the vicinity of John Cowan
either then all that after getting the land he here and
mumb Cowan his position
claims be evidence which this should mpeach Who?
who didn't what was in his banks at Henge
complying with the
his Of state
Judge Cowan?
evidenced Read that Of testimony again.
seeking who unfit to
hold public