The Manning times. [volume] (Manning, Clarendon County, S.C.) 1884-current, 1911-10-04

Central depot.
@. From there where did you go:
A. am not pretty positive-it ha:
been four or five years ago
@. Did you or not go on that oc
casion to Nivison-W eiskopf company:
place Of business? A. Yes, sir.
@. For what purpose did you 81
there? A. They said they were go
ing to buy bottle supplies and labels
@. And you went to the Nivison
Weiskopf company? A. Yes, sir.
@. Did Mr. Boykin go? A. Yes
sir.
@. Mr.. Tatum go? A. Yes, sir.
@. And Mr.. Goodman? A. Yes
sir.
@. And yourself? A. Yes, sir.
@. Did you discuss the label mat
ter going along there or during the
day, at the iNivisson-Weiskopf com
pany? A. Well we spoke about it il
a general way.
@. And you were going there tc
make contract for labels? A. Yes
sir.
@. Well, was there contract en-.
tered into there? A. I do not know
whether it was made there or signed
there or signed here.
@. Was there any agreement OF
understanding about buying the lab.
els there that day? A. Mr.. Goodman
told me-
@. Never mind what Mr.. Good.
man told you. MI. Farley, were
those sketches made in Cincinnati at
the time you were discussing the
matter with Weiskcpf? A. Yes, sir.
@. Mr.. Farley, what proportion OF
the profits were you to receive? A.
I was to receive one-third.
@. One-third? s.. Yes, sir.
Q. State whether or not that is a
check you received in payment Of thu
profit? (Handing paper to witness J
Mr. tombstone: We object now,
unless these men knew it, your hon
or.
The Court: I will let him answer
that question.
Mr. Lyon: Is that the check, Mr..
Farley? A. Yes, sir.
Col. Nelson: s6,50o, is it not, Mr..
Lyon?
Mr.. Welch: s6.534.
Mr.. Lyon: We offer this check in
evidence.
Mr.. Lyon: l,lr. Farley, you had
this conversation with Mr.. Goodman?
A. Yes, sir.
@. What did Mr.. Goodman tell you
on that occasion? A. He told me a
short while afterwards he paid Mr.
Roykin $4,000.
Mr.. Raysor: I object to that, on
this ground, that it was not in fur
therance of this conspiracy. He said
it was several months afterwards, ms
paid money out.
Mr. Lyon: I will ask the question
a little bit differently. ,Mr. Farley
with reference to this conversation
with Mr. Goodman and yourself.
when was this check of $500 and
odd dollars paid you? A. It was af-
ter the labels had been shipped and
paid for.
@. After the labels had been ship
ped and paid for that you got the
check? A. Yes, sir.
@. When was this conversation
had between you and Mr.. Goodman;
was it before you received the check?
A. Which conversation do you refe!
to?
@. When he told you he had paic
Mr. Boykin $4,000. A. 1t was prev
icus to the check.
@. About how many months afte,
they were in Cincinnati? A. Well.
/ do not know positively. will say
week.
@. Within week after they left
Cincinnati? A. Yes, sir.
@. Now, Mr.. Farley, you state that
Mr.. Goodman told you that he had
paid Mr.. Boykin $4,000 A. Yes.
sir.
@. Or an amount in that neighbor-
hood? A. Yes, isr.
@. Did he say whether or not he
paid Mr.. Tatum anything? A. He
said he paid Mr.. Tatum $500.
Mr. Raysor: We object to that.
Mr.. Lyon: Did he say whether he
paid Mr.. Towill anything? A. Yes
sir; he said he paid him some
amount; do not know the exact
amount.
Mr.. Zimmerman: We object
Mr. Lyon: Did he tell you whethe,
be paid anybody else anything OF
not? A. He told me he paid another
party some money, a Mr.. Mack.
@. Was it McCartha? A. l think
so.
@. What relation was McCartha tc
Towill?
Mr.. Zimmerman: We object to
that, your honor. Mr.. McCartha is
not indicted.
Mr.. Lyon: The indictment, your
honor, stated that he paid various
sums to Towill, Bcykin, and other
persons to the jurors unknown.
@. Mr.. Farley, state whether or not
Mr.. Goodman, at this conversation to
which we referred, stated that he
paid Mr.. McCartha some money? A
Yes, sir.
@. Do you know who Mr.. McCartla
is or was? A. He was at one time
connected with the dispensary, but
do not know exactly what year it was
Mr.. Lyon: Mr.. Farley, state wheth'
er or not the amount of money paic
Mr.. Boykin and Towill and others
was TO rthe purpose of securing the
business or was it part of the pro-
fits of which you received one-third
A. It was not from the profits tha1
| T reoaivad The third n0