Bismarck daily tribune. [volume] (Bismarck, Dakota [N.D.]) 1881-1916, 1911-05-02
Opening ARGUMENT FOR DEFENSE
(Continued from Page Eight


othes Who sat that commtee' Who was the speaker that
committed? Is there ash so bold as to assert
Of his favor Judge cowan? Where
political Where have his political friends
been cque Who the members that
and democrat Not
that committee intimately acquainted WITH and
only speaking acquaintance
with Now believe? Are believe that this
mee that appointed Speaker a
such dub they
credy the that
Or are We to believe that that was made of men
changed doing their uty
that corrupted them
gentlemen committee able fair minded
body apponed-apponed not because they
their political affiliations against
him. be
pay that talking
about this morning But tna those men were
that have got just good stuff
have in House Those Americans
testimony after Witness
conclusion which Of
that consequently
the House and reconsider be-
the House, You know gentlemen,
did The House didn't change their position account
of knowledge gained their position
that had the state by extra editions
mob Cruelty him. That why was What evil
The committee None We have listened his
evidence think people
this committee headed
judgment Brennan
Pat Norton
mind but that the people of this
willing to say to Mr. Jorda them they
willing state that the judgment
Joda dnteesd with object no motive is safer judy
that Of those who here the political spleen
against because he
happens Second judicial
district against them and their cohorts.
gentlemen take deal Of time the
question this committee place
members that committee
themselves don't believe that those
apology
didn't be scounds knaes
and had reached conclusion honest
conscientious and repod to the House saw that has
written their tablets of immortal fame in the state North
Dakota couldn't driven coerced by few politicians that
seeking the downfall Of cowan that Jorda
those members that committee did anything that entitled
they had arrived
and Judgment that willing there
then the of that people Of the state didn't retain
Office them
will for his honest convictions while he
driven OUT and let suggest that the people of this state will
something Who going do driving? Our friends
Lake. Kelly
able impeachment proceedings
got different job their hands when
that know them to elect to ocea mighty different job
am going take with
~e being tried for listened snler
hx minutes and thought that during that time he would
being
charged with being tried
in this case had proven failed and failed Mr. snke
before declaration
the incident
convict Judge testimony did
by that What did he mean BY tha' Well give
illustration
which makes mdemeanor to pone language Some
to the masae to have John Jones arrested for
peane language" the
say" "We he heard him BY Gosh and the mas
WELL that isn't profane language "Wel he at
place
magistrate profane
the and said that he would like
George" WELL that isn't prone
guage" Go the Dickens" WELL
We'll know but them all to-
gsther Damn shouldn't
it," Now, is argument
undertaken but they saying For
all together and
respectable drunk convict him
the substance Of five hours and
hair spoh to this bodyhe sum and He undertook to
he undertook that
in drug store and take drink
and is undignded
things and consequently he did moral
thing should find him unfit to
Well objections
place isn't morally wrong to take drink neither
and friend sinke would
the elementary principles Of law he would know that
wasn't morally because as have
Scriptures which accept
religious belief against taking drink there
total abstinence isn't morally wrong