The Salt Lake tribune. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1890-current, 1911-05-27
PRESIDENT SMITH S CASE.

D'''i -
Tho I,r,Io, T;no. =, commcrtiro
upon fbc ,,rool md. Ia. prosiJcn,
smith to thn Enol;sh nconle with re-
,ncct to tho ,.i,,,;or In ErcI,rJ
) ,pain., tbc NIornc,s uodo tho com,
mcpt ,hot ..thc character of tho Wi;
ness Is ,c-y m,tori,l when H., irvitcs
| MS IN consider hi, ,,nsunIovtcd state.
rcpfs - Tho Dc.orof Ncv,s Tho church
oroap took tbat for > teyt ON Thurs.
dav evening and made , yor. long ndi.
,oriaI rnmrcpt Ly wo,. al rcniv /, IS
noteworthy. however. thai The News de
clincs to print tho London Time, editor
ial I'm full !, undertake. with hpt
small sncccss. 10 rcfutc certain conclu.
sinns of ,hc Times. but refuses ,o al.
low jrs readers 10 sec vba, il was that
the Times said. The Tribune printed
the Times editorial in full last Mon.
day morning. and auy one interested in
seeing what was said therein can easily.
hv this reference. 6rd IT,
MT ONLY does the church organ re
| fuse 10 print the Times editorial. if
undertakes 10 nJisrcnrcscnt il. The
News asks whether IL is to understand
that n man with a plurality of wives
is an incompetent witness and must not
he given crcdcncc on that account, II
holds that this would be absurd. while
implying that this is what tho London
Times said. But the London Times said
nothing of that nature Its reference
| in that connection was chiefly TO the
competency of n man living in polyg.
amy TO invoke the Christian law Of mar
riagc. and 10 the inconsistency of man
who has the record of President Smith
undertaking TO convince on his unsup,
ported assertion
nc 'toIt u 'nc news !" "''".I ~
~ 'o' i'e' w. noo',''"", '"'
''"''''>' VI '"C '-o'"o" '','S "''''
''PI''' p;I,sl
- 10 - .y..,ts.o ~
L n,a.
49,. ".
"'''S ,'' g P'' ''O'N' . .,;a.I,.
=" -
Ion" ""' .""N''' ''"' :t, NJ.
I'0,,'N" y. -, ,.;,.,,,os.
W. hi,,, .ir,,r,. ho
""' .l,,, i.,.,,o ;s
"'' ~,
pu"''' o"e' "o' ',"> 1,,.,. ci.h
-. ,,-. n
NJ,
no Pol, S,'.'oo =, II. i.,o,don,,od
7'"S - wh,, : rh,,
md wa
i.'"'u ,a :. ra;rI,. ord
7''', - ,o;,e sn.ce &C ms.
g :," 'n",''''' - ~
The Manifesto of 1870 counsclco
against the performance OF auS I"oic
poiygamous marriages u"' :" i''o'
might not be suppoSeu u po " 'o''''"
or direction TO give up polSS"i"o"' ''e'
previously entered lnto' puC tnere arc
certain PRIME tacts TO DC kepI In NINA
IN TINS conncctlon- ilrsV' inc Pe1it'o"
Tor amnesty" pctitlon lor amnesty
necessarily means tnat those VINO rnahe
II pledge themselves 10 ABANDON tne VI
lenses when they nave coi''h.'''e' auu
conform thencetorth 10 inc law Ao'
cordlnglY' VIC ma ihdI 'no Po''.'o'' va
amnesty plcu9cu '"e i"''" '"'
ot the leaocrs OIL the ho' r,on '""i'" y"
tins point that tn 50 Petit'o"'"c '"''
gave up what had peeh ne'u 10 NV '"o
revelation Inns was 'Ap'esHcu !" ~"
petItloh ana estdpli9"o"
ia submit TO the law ~ "e' "'o' Wv
petition Tor amnesty "oulu nave '''"
a mockery. Frcsldcnl harrison a",
afterwards fresiaen' NlcNe''n"' E'""'"
the amnesty prayed ror' on ln. 'NpieSS
condition that the la" sno"ln oe i'''"-
fully obeyed thenceiortn- ih'Se proc
amations were received with gratitude,
and as deliverance for the orring ones,
and In ihP church n <rpnarn1