Martinsburg herald. [volume] (Martinsburg, W. Va.) 1881-1920, 1911-07-01

is, s12.1S.
September 22-Wm. G. Conley. At
torney General expenses to New York,
IN Virginia debt suit, $500.
October 26-wm. G. Conley, Attor
ney General expenses to Washington,
in relation Maryland-West Virginia
suit. s41.35.
December 7-wm. G.. Conley. At.
toraey General. expenses TO Kingwood
and to Washington, in relation King
land case, s75.75.
December 21-Willards Hotel Co..
board, room, etc, OF Attorney General,
in King land case, 1910.
1910.
February 17-Wm. c. Conley Attor-
ney General. expenses to Richmc nd, in
debt suit, 1920
March 25-Wm. G.. Conley. Attor-
ney General, expenses TO Washington,
in West virginia-Maryland, suit $44.-
| IS.
April 5-Wm. G. Conley, Attorney
General balonce CT expenses on New
York-Washington trip in relation Vir-
sinia debt case, 1896.
April 9-Willards Hctel Co, Wash
ington trip of Attorney General, $685.
81.
April 22-Wm G. Coaley, Attorney
General. expenses to Washington, in
Virginia debt suit, April Is to 30, $685.
| 90.
April 22-Willards Hotel Co, hotel
| bill incurred on above trip. $34.15,
June 25-Wm G. Conley, Attorney
General, expenses to Wheeling, il re-
| lston State VS.. B. Esd o. and other
cases, June 5 to Z, $685.; expenses
TO Washington, in relation Maryland
West Virginia case, June 23, SAILS
Total for the two trips, s6710
June 2S-Wm G. Conley. Attorney
General, expenses to New York, in re
lation to the Virginia debt suit June
% to July 1, $500.
August 20-Wm. G.. Conley, After
ney General, expenses on Elkins trip
| in relation Children's Home, August
| Is to II, $21.65; Washington trip, in
relation Maryland-West Virginia boun
dairy suit s42.15. Total for two trips
| s63S0
September 21-Wm. G. Conley. At
toraey General expenses to New York
in relation Virginia debt suit, s72 45.
September 27-Wm. c. Conley AT
tonney General, expenses to Cumber
land. Md, in relation case of Jack and
Ungar VS.. Berkeley Springs Board
$50.37.
September 2S-Waldorf-Ast tfo
tel Co., hotel bill for Attorney Geaer
a. in relation Virginia debt suit, Sep
tember 16 to 90, s31.10.
While the above includes the mos;
important travelling expense items
for biennial period, it is but small
part of the actual expense incurred in
defending the debt and other suits in
the hands of the attorney Generals
| Office. 1t is also not the emily set OF
series OF items that might be SET
down to show extravaganza In the
conduct of the office. Newspaper sub
1
current expenses of the Office that are
iaclud d in the smaller items. Enough
| subscriptions are recorded in the re
uport to purchase house and lot. For
instance, it Is of record In the report
that while the Attorney subscribed
for the Charleston Mail on January 5
fer a half year, the amount being 81
He renewed his subscription ca Feb
ruary II. this time patronizing more
literally. The subscription was s12
This was in the accounts for 1910
and the date Of the renewal was in the
height of tn Mails Mardi Gras cen
test.
The Charleston Cut Flower Co. has
its name sprinkled rather literally
over the report and it Is not thought
that this concern has a law book de
partment. leaving the students of the
prosy bat withal interesting repc ri
| somewhat in doubt as to the nature
of the transaction recorded.
There should be the finest law libra.
ry in this whole part of the United
States in the Attorney Generals Of
flee. jusging from the frequent recur
renee II American Law Book Com.
pany." West Publishing Company,
and many others, for volumes for the
law library.