The Yale expositor. (Yale, St. Clair County, Mich.) 1894-current, 1911-12-07

ed to accomplish the purpose and blaze
a clear path for honest merchants and
business men to follow. 1t may be that
such plan will be evolved. but l sub
NIT that the discussions which have been
brought out in recent days by the fear
OF the continued execution of the anti
trust law have produced nothing but gilt
tering generalities and have offered no
line Of distinction or rule of action as def
mite and as clear as that which the SUI
preme court itself lays down in enforcing
the statute
Supplemental Legislation Needed-Not
Repeal or Amendment.
I see no objection-and indeed can see
decided advantages--in the enactment or
a law which shall describe and denounce
methods of competition, which are unfair
and are badges OF the unlawful purpose
denounced In the antitrust law. The at
tempt and purpose to suppress compeu-
tor by underselling him at a price so UNI
profitable as to drive him out Of business.
or the making of exclusive contracts with
customers under which they are required
to give up association with other manu-
facturers and numerous kindred methods
for sitting competition and effecting mo-
nopoly, should be described with sufficient
accuracy in a crimipal statute on the one
hand to enable the government to short
meanors instead of an entire conspiracy.
and, on the other hand, to serve the pur-
pose of pointing out more In detail to the
business community what must be
avoided.
Federal Incorporation Recommended.
In a special message to congress on
January T. 1910. l ventured to point out
the disturbance to business that would
probably attend the dissolution OF
these offending trusts. ! said:
But such an investigation and pos
sble prosecution OF corporations whose
prosperity or destruction affects the
comfort not only of stockholders but OF
millions of wage earners. employees
and associated tradesmen must neces-
sarily tend to disturb the confidence et
the business community, 10 dry up the
now flowing sources Of capital from its
places OF boarding. and produce halt
In our present prosperity that VIII
cause suffering and strained circum-
stances among the innocent many Tor
the fault OF the guilty few. The CUES
tion which l wish in this message to
bring clearly to the consideration and
discussion OF congress is whether. in
order to avoid such a possible business
Danger something cannot be done by
which these business combinations may
be offered means. without great hnan-
cial disturbance. of changing the char
acter. organization and extent Of their
business into one within the lines or
the law under federal control and SUI
pervision, securing compliance with the
antitrust statute.
Generally. in the Industrial combi
nations called Trusts, the principal
business is the sale OF goods In many
states and in foreign markets; in other
words. the Interstate and foreign bust
ness far exceeds the business done in
any one state. This fact Will justify
the federal government in granting
federal charter to such a combination
to make and sell in interstate and for
eign commerce the products Of useful
manufacture under such limitations as
will secure a compliance with the anti
trust law. 1t is possible so to frame
a statute that while II offers protec-
ton to federal company against
harmful, vexatious and unnecessary
invasion by the states. II shall subject
IT to reasonable taxation and control
by the states with respect to it's pure
ly local business.
Corporations organized under this
act should be prohibited from acquir-
ing and holding stock in other corpora
tons except for special reasons. upon
approval by the proper federal author
ity). thus avoiding the creation under
national auspices of the holding COM
pany with subordinate corporations in
w
effective agency in the creation OF the
great trusts and monopolies.
IF the prohibition OF the antitrust
act against combinations in restraint
of trade is to be effectively enforced,
IL is essential that the national govern
ment shall provide for the creation OF
national corporations to carry on a
legitimate business throughout the
United States. The conflicting laws of
the different states or the Union with
respect to foreign corporations makes
II diMcult If not impossible. for one
corporation to comply with their re-
uuirements so as TO carry on business
in number of different states"
Federal Corporation Commission Pro
posed.
do not set forth in detail the terms
and sections of n statute which might
supply the constructive legislation permit
ting and aiding the formation of combina-
tons OF capital into federal corporations
They should be subject to rigid rules as
to their organization and procedure, in
GLIDING effective publicity, and to the
closest supervision as to the issue OF
stock and bonds by an executive bureau
or commission in the department of
commerce and labor, to which in times of
doubt they might well submit their pro-
posed plans for future business. 1t must
be distinctly understood that incorpora-
ton under federal law could not ex-
empt the company thus formed and its
incorporators and managers from prose-
cution under the antitrust law for sub
sequent Illegal conduct. but the publicity
of its procedure and the opportunity for
frequent consultation as to the legitimate
purpose of its transactions would offer
it as great security against successful
prosecutions for violations OF the law
as would be practical or wise.
Such bureau or commission might
we'll be invested also with the duty al
ready referred to, of aiding the courts
In the dissolution and recreation of trusts
within the law. 1t should be an execu-
tive tribunal of the dignity and power OF
the comptroller OF the currency or the
Interstate commerce commission. which
now exercise supervisory power over inn