The Washington herald. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1906-1939, 1911-04-04
Supreme Court of the United states.

Present: The Chief Justice. Mr.. Justice Harlan
Mr.. Justics McKenia. Mr. Justcn Helms. Mr.
Justice Day, Mr. Justice Llrton, Mr. JuSsics
Hughes. Mr.. Justice Van Deranter. and Mr.. Justice
lamar.
Joshua Reuben Cla-k. ir.. Of Washington, ID. c.
Calvin F. Smith, Of Easton. Pa; Asher Seip d
T. Z. Barkworth. Of Jafkson. Mich: Elihu Root
u, Of New YORK City. n. Y: James A. Reed. o
Kansas City. No.; y. p Bnan of jacksonville
Fla; W. C. Dennis. Of Richmond. Ind: c. G.
Hornor. ct Guthrie Okla: J. Elder Peelor. Of
Indiana, Pa; Clifford L. Hilton. Of Fergus Falls
MINI. Harry c. Fithian. Of williamsport. Pa
Daniel Hyron Greene. Of Washington, d. c.; Gil,
bert Holland Stewart. jr.. Of Columbus, Ohio
ycrmiiicn. of Wichita. Rams; Willard p. Hall. Of
Kansas City, No.. and Fred Iriand of Detroit
Midi, were admitted to practice
No. y DIR. lilies Medical Company. petitioner.
W John ID. PARK Sons Company: on writ Of
c:rtioran to the Unite States Court Of Appeals
for the Sixth circuit; decree affirmed with costs.
and cahse renandcd to the Circuit Court O. the
United States for tho Eastern district Ct Ken
tucky. .Opnion by Mr. Justice Hughes. Dissent
ing: Mr.. Justice Holmes. Mr.. Justice Lurton did
not participate in the consideration and decision
Of this case
No. 81. The Western Union Telegraph COMPANY.
plaintiff N error, Lawrence ]. CroSo and
Walter Crenshav. trading Croyo & Crnshnw
in er1r to the Law and Equity Court Of the
city Of Richmond. State Of Virginia; Judgment
affirmed with costs Opinion by Mr.. Justicr Lur-
No 81. The Western Union Telegraph Company.
plaintiff in error, Lawrence j. Grove and
Walter CroTshaw, trading Grove CrensShaw
IN orrcr to the Supreme Court Of Appeals Of the
State Of Virginia: dismissed with costs. Opinion
By Mr.. Justicr Nrton.
No 81 Verisimo vasquez Villas. plaintiff in er-
ror and appellant. vs. The City # Manila: in error
tn and appeal from tho Supreme Court q the
Philippine Islands: Judgment reversed with costs.
and cause remsnded with directions to oYerulc the
demurrer and for such other action may be en-
siSent with law and with the opinion of this court
Opinion by Mr.. Justice Lurtn.
M a. Esperanza Otero Trgas ct al, plaintiffs
In error and appellants. The City II Manila in
error to and appeal from the Supreme Court Of the
Philippine Islands; Judgment reversed with costs.
and csIiss rrmanded with directions to overrule the
demurrer and for such other action as mar be
consistent with law and with the opinion Il this
court. Opinion By Mr.. Justice Lurtcn.
No. T. Ricardo Aguada appellant vs. The
City Of Manila; appeal from the Supreme Court Ct
the Philippine Islands; decree reversed with costs
and cause remandcd with directions to render
pidgment and such other relief as may seem in
conformity with Law. Opinion by Mr.. Justice
EnrtOn
No. loi. Hills & Company. limited rs. Joseph
Hoover ct al; on Certificate from the United
STATES Circuit Court Of Appeals for the Third
circuit: questions certified answered in the af-
frrnatire. Opinion by Mr.. Justice Day.
No n2 Eicsnte Garcia GaTierrs. plaintiff in
cTor. w. The United States: in error to the Sr-
prime Court Of the Philippine Islands: Judgment
AHMED. Opinion by Mr.. Justice Day. Dissent
lns. Mr.. Justice Harlan.
No. IS Rafael Enrique IN his own name and
as administering. &c. ct al. appellants vs. Fran
cisco SaeZ GoTiongcox ct al: appeal from the
supreme Court Of the Philippine Islands: decree
affirmed with costs Opinion By Mr.. Justice Holmes.
No. &. Theresa Arnett ct al. appellants. vs.. d..
NJ Reade; appeal from the Supreme Court Of the
Territory q New Mexico; decree rcEersed with
costs. and cause remanded for further proceedings
IN conformity with the opinion Of this court Opin
ion by Mr.. Justice Holmes. Dissenting. Mr.. Jus
tcs McKenna.
No. los. Tho United ststcs plaintiff in erru
vs.. John ]. OBrien, Individually &c. ct al. in
error TO the Uhite1 States Circuit Cont Of Ap-
pcals for the Second circuit; Judgment affirmed and
cause remanded To the Circuit Court Of The United
States for the Southern district Of New York.
Opinion By Mr.. Justice Holmes
No. i Original. The STATE Of Oklahoma. oDrn-
plainant. vs.. the Atcsrison, Topeka and Santa Fc
Railway Company: disn Used for the want Of iuris
diction. Opinion By Mr.. Justice Harlan
No. II Original. The State IF Oklahoma rsti-
Railsay Company ct al. dismissed for the want
Of Jurisdiction Oranicn BY Mr.. Justice Harlan.
No. 8. The State of Oklahoma. On the relation
Of Charles West, attorney general. &c. plaintiff
in error. vs.. the Chicago RocS Island and Pacific
Railway Company; IN error to the Supreme Court
Of the State Of Oklahoma; Judgment affirmed with
costs. Opinion tg Mr.. Justice Harlan.
No. SO. The United States Of America, appel
LIANT. vs. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company: ap-
PEAL from the Circuit Court Of the United States
for the Eastern district Of Pennsylvania decree
further procsedings IN conformity with the opinion
Of this Court Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice White.
No. So. The United States Of America. appellant,
vs.. Erie Railroad Company: appeal from the Cir
cult Court 1t the United States for the Eastern
district Of Pennsylvania; decree affirmed Opinion
by Mr.. Chief Justice White.
No. IS. The United States Of America, appellant.
vs.. the Central Railroad COMPANY Of New Jersey ::
appeal from the Circuit Court Of the United States
for the Eastern district o. Pennsylvania decree af
frmed- Opinion by Mr.. Chief Justice White.
No. So. The United States Of America appellant
vs. The PENNSYLVANIA Railroad Company; appeal
from the Circuit Court Of the United States for
the Eastern district Of Pennsylvania; decree az
hrmed. Opinion BY Mr.. Chief Justice White
Nos. and 10. Original. EI parte: In the mat
ter of the State Of Oklahoma petitioner: rules dis
charged. and petitions for writs Of prohibition de-
MED Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice White.
Nos - and so. Mariana Martinez administra-
tor. &c. appellant. vs. The international Banking
Cooperation: appeals from the Supreme Court Of the
Philippine Islands dismissed for the want Of juris-
diction. Opinion by Mr.. Chief Justice White.
No. IS. Interstate Commerce Commission ct al.
Western Railroad Company ct al; appeal from the
Circuit Court Of the United States for the South
I'm district d New York decree reversed with
costs and cause pmanded with directions to dis
miss the BILL Opinion by Mr.. Chief Justice White.
No. ITO. Jose PEREZ Fernandez and Victor
ochos, appellants. vs.. Jose Antonio Fernandez
Perez appeal from the District Court Of the
United States for Porto Rico: decree reversed with
her proceedings in conformity with the opinion of
his court Opinion by Mr.. Chief Justice White.
No. Ill. Perfecta Blanco y. Blanco appellant, vs.
Harry 8. Hubbard United States marshal for
Porto Rico ct al; appeal from the District Court
II the United States for Porto Rico; decree re
Tersed with costs and cause remanded fer further
not inconsistent with the opinion OF
his court. Opinion by Mr.. Chief Justice White.
The Chief Justice also announced the following
,rders Of the court:
No. 3l4. The United States. plaintiff in error. rs.
n p,nfiN fnrl a-are N
Is amic curiae granted; motion for leave to make
nal argument denied.
No. 56. John A. Knott ct al, appellants, vs.
chicago Burlington and Quincy Railroad Com
ANY; and
No ssi. Chicago. Burlington and Quincy Rail-
Dad Company. appellant, vs. John A. Knott ct al.
Sc: motion to set aside submission and reset
ases denied.
No. go. Yeung How. sometimes known as Young
hau appellant vs.. Hart II. North. United States
Commissioner. &c; motion to admit appellant to
all denied.
No. ga. The Corporation Of ST Anthony. in New
bedford petitioner. Michael J. Houlhan; petit
len for a writ Of certiorari 10 the Uuited States
rcuit Court Of Appeals for the First circuit denied