The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1911-12-29

said 81 dare not say what think of Hyde.
| might make the language too strong.
Herman llohnl I70 West Broadway.
did NOT say. he makes oath. that Hyde
urvht to got life damn nice bunch of
rascai=. thatS all they are
Martin Wallace" another mentioned by
!Idon SAYS he uo,ri formed an opinion
,lou Hyd" one w.. .. other that
Lc had mover talked wa tii"n and that
No. d.d uot ~ay. 81, is going TO he hot for
Hyd"
Il. + trIk # lIS Hamilton place was
sur, be- never SAID io iIld"u or anybody
"Hyi" ra a peach
The m>"-ti gators wont to 500 Wcst
I,a.h street looking for "NI Gallup" who
Nds quoted by llldru ~ saving.
"lIvdo I- q, rul'' ~ III" Mcnamara
hrothrr- lhcv ~.ud at SOD West ii5th
street Il Laundry th th" name Gallup
OBJ, IN" window. b,J Mrs X Eluhorn. IN"
proprietor told them that ~h" bought the
laundry ftOm Gallup two Yeats ago aud
that Gallup had not h""u on New York
eIu,'
Whom they Looked for james Bradley,
stone contractor. a. j-u West llJth street .
they were ,old hy tho luwtur of th" apart
ment hou~" that no such person lived
there.
Ola Svcudsun. 5oo Wo-, iIeth street.
did not rav, h" puts IN his affidavit Hyde
isa crook
Morris Ulmnn. iii Hamilton place. de
MED that he told IIliru. "Hvd" ought To
he hung
The District ATTORNEY commenting on
these and many mOlp Ot similar tenor said
that his investigators believed that most
Of the persons mentioned hv Iilden had
been dcpusltOr~ IN the Carnegie Trust
COMPANY or the Northern Bank of New
YORK The significance of that. the in
veetigatnr~ said. was that these persons
might have boeu "Nprctod to Sav uuhind
things about peoil" VINO had been con
nected IN any way with Joseph Is Reich
mann or William j tumnlus
John Il StInchHeId. who has repre-
Scnted Mr. Hyde lately and who submitted
to tho District Attorney the notice of Il
motion for change NJ venue and the
ACCOMMODATING at'davt~. wha asked YES
terdav afternoon If ho had anything to
sav about the District Attorney : state
ment that the Tldcu affidavit had shady
look and that it would hc Il matter for
Grand Jury Investigation
"Iou can say tO the District Attorney
or anybody "l~r. replied Mr. Stanchhcld,
that We VIII fight him m the courts and
not in the newspapers
The courts are exactly where | have
bean trying To locate this case said the
District Attorney later.
Man u. St"urr vino Will try HYDE :
case aid he didn't know that the TIldcn
affidavit had been prepared until hc read
about n IN the new -raOcr~
II Charles ". HYDE Ccts Supreme
Cou'1 order transferring his trial for
bribery out Of this county District At
torney Whitman will appeal AZ once"
Judge Whitman hopes that the Appellate
Division viii agrp" with him that no
reason exists why the "N-Cltv Champor-
lain cant get -ludr" deal in thls neigh
horhuud.
'GMr Stanchdrid representing Charles
n HYDE. Will max" hi~ argument for a
change Of veuu" b"for" Supr"m" Court
Justice Lehman IA Special Term Par. |
next Friday afternoon. But the District
Attorney ha-n'l changed his plans for
getting the Hyde trial under wa. Next
Tuesday morning Judge Whitman will
request the court To- lmpanel tdl"Smen
in the case of the People against Charles
II Hyde That will get the case started
II Mr. StauChti"ld'> motion l. denied
the case Will 60 TO trial on Monday Jauu.
arv :. II tn" motion l. granted TN" Dis
trlct Attorney Will ask for quick action
by the App"llat" Division.
There has been considerable speCula %
t,on ~ to just who - Mr. Ivde's legal
repreeentGtiv" stephen Baldwin 3p-
pe,red for Hyde originally Mr. Stauch-
field has been appearing for him J., ely
But james " Osborn" has been r,'. Trd
by Hyde and i Is known 'h.' 'nv u.1-". wiI
he tried by M,.N u Ni"u"r Occasionally
Inquiries are mad" concerning n" Hvdt
case by the office Of tntermynr 4 Mar.
shall although Samuel Untermyer one OF
Hyde's original counsel re-, ircd from tn.
case a good while ago.