Bismarck daily tribune. [volume] (Bismarck, Dakota [N.D.]) 1881-1916, 1911-05-03
TRACY BANGS MARES an ELOQUENT Plea
Continued from Page Eight.


before Men not constituted We look with different view points
upon different questions. 1t unchatabe for of
frame up Zine up Sign up" either side the other
question:. line up? What cline up"
President Taft proposed reciprocity with Canada and here
favored did happened
be Of those Democrats who did not favor it, signed call for
discuss and protest Washington
who did There
opposed line
with President Taft did him? Did
other line up? Why We simply looked at the treaty differently
could the surroundings and then
according the best from different points
conditions difference judgment between those who ia
vod and those who opposed it, and that the all these
things if simply follow them to the bottom 1t simply
difference of opinion of each each question:
Now, my friends will have the indulgence the for
and OF the this for
reason against me-
visited upon devoted head cold that has settled throat and
order the different
points which hope to- So necessary you
but if the finds
that not speaking loud enough will signify that
fact and I will make myself heard distinctly
this morning the of the delayed
The first that have consider is that OF Oxenah Hales
l think it is under charge p specification 6.
your particularly because has received
during taking evidence There
~ come thnos in This case that are matters Of public notor;ev and
have knowledge of that In other
Senators what know You not like
justice when brought before him for trial. the justice
his and he replied "why know
nam you isl" the justice sad go
on your is and he replied M" Square, know
is and the justice REPLIED that makes difference
go and he told his and then followed
question, where do c and he sad what do ask
replied that makes difference and tell where
he replied why live just block behind you and then
the justice said what business? and he REPLIED Great Scott
You know my u.s. replied, when the
bench supposed to know man. and he sad w if
don't know much the bench do had better
So take know much the bench off, In the
Oxerdah Hae Hon. Guy H. Corss, who appeared be-
indignation meeting held Grand Forks
resolution that the house. Now, let what
gentleman did, before this and acknowledged
you mistaken period of two with respect to
finally submitted John F. Cowan
his best figures tell what his evidence before the House
BEEN AS he did discover this mistake until after he
here testify positive that this had been finally sub
1906 greatly surprised when he found that letter that
passed forth that until 1909 that he finally had
written Burke Mddaugh Cuhb that his client would not the
expenses necessary and that they might with
and that he would do with it. Do remember
testimony? What he said before the committed? That
he admitted here that he had dis
after he Bismarck testify before
Senate presumption when he before that House
told them that had been submitted John
way and he further his mistake after
he came here his
asked how soon after had notified Middaugh
Cube that he of the and would anything for
the transcript and he said "Oh m positively thirty
days." and again
he told from October 1903, until April 1902
His ttv davs had stretched as much as many of John Cowan
happened 1906? Corl Burke, Mid
his client would of the
nerse o ,not and was decided that he would return the paoe
remember the returned to Burke Mddaugh
Cuhe and will also remember there talk of settlement
1905 1t shown by the letters and Coriss d Il"
might although exhibiting his and
tyg before the House committee and talking at the indignation meet
g do suppose there anything said about statement? Oh
This distinguished gentleman VINO prepared al moments hou
either judge nothing that called his
letter Mr. Nostdahl had, and if Burke
Middauah the Cois letters with the
of Burke Middaugh Cuber when they turned
John Do remember The testimony shows the 18th
September 1910 This has received considerable attention
the They have spoken this
opportunity they had the early proceedings of this
the which this distinguished gentleman
engen and then had be enlightened
himself submitted John Cowan September 1910
anything serious about the fact that that has
decided tne There has been considerable of that
time that John Cowan not in position to decide Mr.
Nosdahl brief be submitted, and think
doubtful that has been submitted to Mr. Cowan There
question that John Cown might
these have transcript and arguments from be-
decide this that the facts and
Oxenda dscoses without the fact that
that has been submitted Is for to call
particularly Of the testimony of this gentleman? If
be to Corlss will
member in whhhe said he had overlooked the because Mr. Cowan
Niddaugh wanted and he said
Mddug then Corss remembered his with
Mr. Cuhb 6 he did remember delay and he forgot the
settlement, thought letter in 30 days,