The Big Sandy news. [volume] (Louisa, Ky.) 1885-1929, 1911-02-24

refuse to take good. liberal price for II.
Naboth declared as his objection that the
Lords regulations forbade that he should
sell his family Inheritance. Apparently
II was hopeless case and Ahab, solemn
and sour, lay abed, refusing food.
Covetousness In Action
Then entered Jezebel the Queen, lnquir-
ing the cause OF his sorrow. Hearing II
she answered, will give II to you. Forth
with she wrote letters to the chief men Of
the city, signing the letters with her hus-
bands seal. With brutal frankness the
letters told the select men OF the city
what was desired Of them.
% They were to make mockery Of re-
llgion by keeping a fast
% They were to act hypocritically to
their neighbor Naboth by giving him the
most prominent place Of honor at the fast
CD They were to provide two worthless
scamps presumably by bribery who. at
the appropriate time in the fast would
take their places near Naboth and then,
with felgned religious fervor. protest
against him and denounce him as a bias
phemer OF God and the King. corroborat-
ing each other with sworn testimony that
they had heard the blasphemy with their
own ears.
20 The penalty Of blasphemy was rec
ognized to be that of stonlng and the de-
cree was to be carried out and Naboth
thus to be gotten rid OF.
II we are inclined TO feel or speak
strongly OF the wicked course OF Jezebel.
as we should, let us not forget that some
what similar practices prevail In our day.
True. no one today could be stoned to
death at the suggestion OF a Queen In
civilized lands Nevertheless, people have
been heard to express the wish that they
had lived in former times, so as to have
had an opportunity for stoning those
whom they dlsllked. But take a case in
point: Suppose man conducting a sue
cessful business Suppose covetous neigh
bors set up competing business, as they
would have full right to do. But sup
pose, then. that one or the other, coyetiifs
the whole trade, were TO attempt sharp
practises in business, selling commodities
at below cost interfering with the other 8
credit at the bank, or slandering the 9TH
er, would not this be covetousness In ac-
tion-covetousness of the same kind which
King Ahab entertainment And would IL
not be reprehenslble in Gods sight? And
dare any who respect the Lord so thor
oughly neglect the Golden Rule Of his
word7
Another illustration: A storekeeper do
ing good business was oHefed certain
commodity at less price than he had
been paying under a three-years' contract.
He accepted The party who had been
ceiling him this commodity In the past
was angry covetous Of the trade He set
up competing business and sold goods
at a loss, as he could afrord to do. being
wealthy, until the FIRST storekeeper failed
for lack OF business. Then the new store
was closed down, because 1t had effected
its work as a business assassin. II had
killed Naboth. Indeed, coyetousness and
Jezebel methods adapted to present-day
conditions, prevail much more generally
than the majority Of people suppose ant
chiefly amongst the very rich, who have
enough and to spare, but who covet theil
nelghbors stocks and bonds, gold and sill
yer, etc II God denounced Ahab as hav
Ing sold himself to iniquity, what would
the Lords verdict be on some OF the Gus
toms OF our day. which has so mncf
greater degree OF light and knowledg'
than Ahab possessed2
aThat Woman Jezsbeb