The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1911-12-07

dependent companies have q 30 ner
cent, while the American Tobacco com
pany will have 39.08 per cent, the Liz
gett & Meyers 2oe6 per cent, the Loril-
lard company 22.82 per cent and the
Reynolds company 2.66 per cent. The
stock Of the other thirteen companies.
both preferred and common, has been
taken from the defendant American
Tobacco company and has been dis
tributed among it's stockholders. All
covenants restricting competition have
been declared null and further ner-
formance of them has been enjoined.
The preferred stock of the different
companies has now been given voting
power which was denied it under tho
old organization. The ratio of tho nra.
TERED stock to the common was as "a
10 ~. This constitutes very decided
change in the character of the owner
snip and control of each company.
In the original suit there were twen-
LYNNE defendants. who were CHARGED
with being the conspirators throush
"hom the illegal combination acquired
and exercised its unlawful dominion
Under the decree these defendants will
bold amounts of stock in the various
d1str1butee companies ranging from 81
per cent as a maximum to 28h ner
cent as minimum, except in the case
OF one small company, the Porto Rican
Tobacco company, In which they will
hold 45 per cent. The twenty-nine in
d1V1dual defendants are enjoined for
three years from buying any stock ex-
cept from each other, and the sroup is
thus prevented from extending it's con-
troll during that period. All parties to
the suit and the new companies who
are made parties are enjoined perpet-
ually from in any way effecting any
combination between any of the com.
pan1es in violation Of the statute by
way Of resumption of the old trust.
Each of the fourteen companies is en-
Joined from acquiring stock in any of
the others. All these companies are
enJo1ned from having common direc-
Tors or officers. or common buying or
selling agents, or common Offices. or
lending money to each other.
Size OF New Companies.
Objection was made by certain in
dependent tobacco companies that this
settlement was unjust because it left
companies with very large capital in
active business and that the SETTLE
ment that would be effective to put all
on an equality would be a division of
the capital and plant of the trust into
small fractions in amount more near
~ equal to that of each of the indie
pendent companies. This contention
results from misunderstanding of
the antitrust law and it's purpose. It
Is not intended thereby to prevent the
accumulation Of large capital in bust
ness enterprises in which such CON-
Dlnatlon can secure reduced cost of
production, sale and distribution. It
is directed against such an aggreea-
ton Of capital only when it's purpose
Is that of sitting competition, enhanc-
ing or controlling prices and establish
Ing monopoly. If we shall have by
the decree defeated these purposes
and restored competition between the
large units into which the capital and
plant have been divided we shall have
accomplished the useful purpose of
the statute
confiscation Not tho Purpose of the
Statute.
1t Is not the purpose Of the statute
to confiscate the property and capital
OF the offending trusts. Methods of
punishment by fine or Imprisonment
OF the individual offenders, by fine of
the corporation or by forfeiture of its
goods In transportation are provided,
but the proceeding in equity is a spe-
c1f1c remedy to stop the operation of
the trust by injunction and prevent
the future use Of the plant and capital
In violation Of the statute
Effectiveness of Decree,
1 venture to say that not in the his
tory of American law has a decree
more effective for such a purpose been
entered by court than that against
the tobacco trust AS Circuit Judge
Noyes said in his Judgment approving
the decree:
1.-The extent to which it has been
necessary to tear apart this combina-
ton and force it into new forms with
the attendant burdens ought to demon
strate that the federal antitrust statute
Is drastic statute which accomplishes
effective results, which so long as it
stands on the statute books must be
obeyed and which cannot be disobey-
ed without mourning farreaching pen.
alties. And, on the other hand, the
successful reconstruction of this Or
ganization should teach that the effect
Of enforcing this statute is not to de-
stroy, but to reconstruct: not to de-
molish, but to recreate in accordance
with the conditions which the congress
has declared shall exist among the
people of the United States.''
Common Stock Ownership.
It has been assumed that the pres
ent pro rata and common ownership in
all these companies by former stock
holders of the trust would insure a
continuance of the same old single con-
troll Of all the companies into which