Mexico weekly ledger., 1911-09-14
AUoRAIN COUNTY CIR
CUT COURT DOCKET

Thursday. sept "A.
Lutte Diggs vs. No 1 The Wabash r.
R. Co.
Barney FennevaId VS.. The Wabash
r. R. Co.
Henry Stuart vs.. Chicago & Alton
4. R. Co.
T. NJ. Barre VS.. The waDsah R.
Il. Co.
John Kane VS.. Chicago & Alton R
R. Co.
MOlue C. Balnter ct al VS.. JOella
less ct al.
Kellogg Birse & Co. VS.. W. N.
Eabes.
Carrie B. creasey VS.. Mason NJ.
Creasey.
Friday, Sept. IS.
NJ. L. Jones ct al VS.. Chicago G
Alton r. r. Co,
Jerome b. Fleming VS.. La. 6 Mo.
River r.. R. Co. ct al.
S. Z. Ely VS.. G, V. Sutton ct al.
salIie Hartley ct al VS.. Estate of
William Hartley.
duncan C Myers VS.. w. G. Broyles.
Ora A. Edison VS.. C. F. Clark ct al.
G. A, Bast VS.. John 7. Mason.
Henry s. Parker ct al VS.. Edward
p. Masun ct al.
W. w. Brown VS.. La. & Mo. Rlv-
Ier II. X. Co., ct al.
Saturday, Sept. 10.
Apex Investment Co. VS. r. T. Bry-
an
Duncan & Myers VS.. G. F. Smith.
App.
Monday, Sept. 1s.
State O. Missouri vs. orval Tuck
ef.
Addio Meas VS.. c., B. 6 q. R. R.
(Reilef Dept.)
Mary E. Holt VS., A. j.. Hill.
William Albus VS.. Chicago & Al
ton R. r.. Co.
e, NJ, Elliott VS.. Western Union
Telegraph Co.
E. A. Keiser VS., Blanche G, Walk
er ct al.
In the matter of Assignment of W.
J. McLouey 6 Co. W. e. Sharp,
Assignee.
ellie Carter VS.. The Wabash R.
+, Co.
Louis o,Brlen VS.. Chicago C Al
ton R. r.. Co.
Thomas Horton VS.. Geo. Stone
NETS, ct al. j, II. Brown, Garnishee.
w. F. White ct al VS., f, G. Butts.
Chicago Portrait Co. Clarence H
~IIarshbarger ct al
Hugh e. Tighe VS.. w. II. Logan.
James j. Quinn VS.. Germania Fire
Ins. Co. New York
Ralph w. Luckie VS.. The Wabash
Il. r.. Co.
Mexico Brick & Fire Clay Co.
VS.. Henry H. Meyer.
Tuesday, Sept. 10.
Jas. C. Webb VS.. Maggie Webb.
Robert Anderson VS., Chicago &
Alton r. R. Co.
w. II. Tapley VS.. Chicago & Al
ton n. RICO.
S. T. Harrison VS.. c. B. G Q. R.
r. Co
City of Mexico VS.. Arthur F, Eos
ter,
Harlem Weeks ct al VS.. Virginia
Sehaubacher, ct al.
State of Missouri VS.. Clarence Car
ter.
State of Missouri VS.. Willard Bur
ton
state of Missouri VS.. Hall 6 Nc
Minerva Martin VS.. J., w. Barnett.
p. H. Cullen VS.. Insurance Co. Of
North America,
p. H. Cullen VS.. American ms.
Co. of Boston.
p. Fl. Cullen VS.. German Ameri-
can ms. Co.
p. H. Cullen VS.. Firemen's ms.
90. L
P. H. Cullen VS., Penn Fire ms Co
If Penn. '
The Gold Issue NJ, & M. Co. ys.r
Fidelity Phoenix Fire Ins Co of J
New York.
The Gold Issue NJ. & NJ. Co. VS.. /
The Penn Fire Ins Co. of Philadel- |
phia.
The Gold Issue M, & M. Co. The
Cor. of the Royal Exchange Assur. Of G
London, England. u
The Gold Issue M, & M. Co. VS.. i
Atlas assurance CO., of London.
The Gold Issue M. & M. Co. VS..
Equitable Fire and Marine ms Co Of a
Providence r |. n
The Gold Issue NJ. 6 NJ. Co. VS..
Scottish Union & Natl Ins. Co. S
The Gold Issue NJ. & M, Co. VS..
The New Hampshire Fire ms. Co. Of s
Manchester.
Tue Gold Issue M. & M. Co. VS.. a
Royal Inns. Co. of Liverpool. {
Tho Gold Issue M. a NJ. Co. VS.. /
Fire Association Of Philadelphia. Il
The Gold Issue NJ. & M. Co, VS..
The Providence Washington Ins, Co,
1f Providence, R. |. :
The Gold Issue M & NJ. CO. w. !
Queens Ins. Co, of America.
The Gold Issue M. & M. Co, VS.. !
rhe Niagara Fire ms. Co. Of the '
CITY Of New York. :
The Gold Issue M. & M. Go. Natl
VS.. Fire ms. Co. OF Hartford, Conn.
The Gold Issue M. Sc M. Co. vs..
Firemen's Friend ms. Co Of San '
francisco. Calf. =
W. II. Dudley VS., The Wabash r. $
Co. T.
q. S. Ewing VS.. Chicago 6 Alton R. '
R CO.
Valentine Erdel VS.. Margaret Erdel
H. C. Swift APP /, VS.. Wallace
Jotnsons.
Henry Embree VS., INK, Heirs of |
l
Ina DeMaud Rhoadman VS., Phoenix {
AMut Life Ins. Co, {
In the matter of the Helm Els Y
tate. A.. G. Turner, Trustee. Il
w. H. Salyers. ct al vs.. j. 0, Cot
tie. 4
C. Il. Dodd ct al VS.. ]. T. john
son