Aberdeen herald. [volume] (Aberdeen, Chehalis County, W.T.) 1886-1917, 1911-12-07

pOrtunitv for continued cooperation
must disappear. Those critics who
speak Of this disintegratiOn in the trust
as a mere change of garments have not
given consideration to the inevitable
working of the decree and understand
little the personal danger of attempt
ing to evade or set at naught the sol
emn injunction of Il court whose object
is made plais by the decree and whose
inhibtions are set forth with detail
and comprehensiveness uneXampled in
the history of equity jurisprudence.
Voluntary Reorganzations of Other
Trusts at Hand.
The effect of these two decisions has
led to DEGREES dissolving the combina-
ton of manufacturers of electric
lamps. a southern wholesale grocerS'
association. an interlocutory decree
against the powder trust, with direc
lions by the circuit court compelling
dissolution. and other combinations of
a similar history are now negotiating
with the department of justice looking
to Il disintegration by decree and re
organization in accordance with law.
1t seems possible to bring about these
reorganizations without general bust
ness disturbance.
Movement For Repeal of the Anti
trust Law.
But now that the antitrust act is
seen to be effective for the accomplish
ment of the purpose of its enactment
we are met by Il cry from many differ
ent quarters for its repeal. 1t is said
to be obstructive of business progress.
to be an attempt to restore old fash
toned methods Of destructive cOmpeti-
ton between small units and to make
impossible those useful combinations
of capital and the reduction of the cost
of production that are essential to con-
tinued prosperity and normal growth.
In the recent decisions the supreme
court makes clear that there is moth
ing in the statute which condemns
combinations of capital or mere big
ness of plant organized to secure econ
omy in production and reduction Of
its cost 1t is only when the purpose
or necessary effect Of the organization
and maintenance Of the combination
or the aggregation of immense size are
the sitting of competition, actual and
potential. and the enhancing Of prices
and establishing a monopoly that the
statute is violated. Mere size is no
sin against the law. The merging of
two or more business plants necessari-
1x- >I;V hot A
units thus combined, but this elimina-
ton is in contravention of the statute
only when the combination is made for
purpose of ending this particular COM
petition in order to secure control OF
and enhance prices and create mo
nopoly.
Lack of Defniteness In the Statute.
The complaint is made of the stat
ute that it is not sufficiently definite
in it's description of that which Is for
its violation. The suggestion is that
we may have combination Of two
corporations which may run on for
years and that subsequently the at
torney general may conclude that 1t
violation of ,ho e+otuto and that
which was supposed by the comblners
to be innocent then turns out to be a
combination i'll violation OF the statute.
The answer to this hypothetical case
Is that when men attempt to amass
such stupendous capital as will enable
them to suppress competition, control
prices and establish monopoly they
know the purpose of their acts. Men
do not do such Il thing without having
it clearly in mind. If what they do is
merely for the purpose of reducing the
cost of production. without the thought
of suppreS~ing competition by use of the
bigneSS of the plant they are creating.
then they cannot be convicted at the
time the union is made, nor can they
DC COW ''e" '",'I ""''~' IL ""II"''
'"a' '"''' ~! '"'H V'''' ''''i' ~ Nul'
.,.., .,.',,
,,,
'''i -
90 -
'i'e -.
"a r. ''''''
New Remedies Suggested.