Weekly journal-miner., 1911-08-02
PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
 OF YAVAPAI COUNTY

OFFICE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF XAvAPA @ " As7oNA @ Sf sS95o je e .saPl S11si 1'S1 met P'ar ssf %mbs s hPtatRR Psef F Ge '6 R Dt @ Hn local @e & 0p ston n s presented ed the Board and ~ d full by the eptin Chairman Rl'tcS to'rit: ~
 In re- Localo Option
 To tn. Hon. Board of Supervisors P5f Tsss atSaa coaa9 S Ar6a. 5 1911 The files office show that June 9th 1911 petition filed in your office praying for m coud & oGa % qPSn @ e'n @ Its show that the first petition 5 wa taken up for M Rd fo option election was filed & in your office off & s i may h question whether the requisite subject practically of the Texas - ss s e % g.sass @ Ps's % % 'ss ss % % @ '9 H & & petitions Pi: fs ' tn f ; u s6a 6 ss Ra @ E petitions Pe % s % osa s oP Ps the ss Fsa
 Smith Smith vs Patton, Patton 45 S s W 45gi 7,;.
 Ifsn IGsSS ys ' state ate iay a5 o W s sss S iii''
 a s sp5s s5 . el y % had make % S % the 'aa @da % % % 's f % they
 sss s6n % $ DGS' % the nf % h ~3 @ TS fbe 2 eoaP @ nss " the
 sss %in5- s S 5s ' 9ssst P; nozcstg Ho TGn sad County % The s of hese petitions R u9s @ S S 3n was sH I S r $o Pia & "h s t s intoxicating liquors nediad bs producing oeatioH 1S
 petitions contained the requisite numbsF qualified vOteFs of 3 conn though petitioners shOuIdaI be signed to petition
 While question still the facts show that the petitions filed different and that the In case Bhdewen s the csoRt @ the e lsth 6@st sa ] % as n d % s & @ @ na n Be s o an % s G the r 5 eto aoD We t together file aa % & & was granted amt A snd @ did in so T T then others containing IA other which filed and A. Bride filing them with the five The took this motion advise % n Hn f ] S & 3 FS @ n R 3 ev & ft % @ e the SP petitions ns os G @ and others % nnf make @ the & same & & Pa % nnd a & @ to- @ might withdraw he names from the petition % they S desired to do Garrett and others to be filed separate & petition and they were filed relief and the williams exactly except The Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas in lowing language:
 majority e of fss s sa asd Inhabitants teT ns r Gs prop 3 % % 'a % sale san % 6PtH ] son eeSR S 5 & Ou 6 district @ Ps @ oPGer % % ba 5 @ @ @ % b @ % S c @ % 5 oof mn @ G e @ consider @ % of act Upon apy @ them @ and the % @ "a @ Irged SE @ P @ % % of g sioS % % t6e adult m the district % & compiled 3 & ~9 t6e be 5qts' @ & tee made The fact that there of them and they were filed at The filing the remOn:ane such change cut off dsny siding in the proposed sign petition any ing the e of quor the according
 opinion that under these decisions it duty consider election Your minute entry above quoted fails show that you took any up consideration and postponed it for another month fails to show dPons @ the S. f5 6sT , tit fhe & % p = 5 % @ @ = h @ @ % b @ o sP5a s9s t ' 5 @9 % % % @ % o f'f & 'Ss S 9sf 9 @ uS m election very (signedj H D. ROSS District Attorney moved seconded and carried that % all three petitions .3a @ arranged a0 es oFs s sg % $ ] p % % 3 final at df as d ton of the same postponed until t@s July a d S at aO F. Cam sP % were n agPG the 6 6 @ % % @ King 1 HaGa hr eamp a f me @ & % snt % and nayment @ o same ee ordered