River Falls journal. [volume] (River Falls, Pierce County, Wis.) 1872-2019, 1911-12-28

measure that the duty on secured wool
is prohibitory. In general. they are as
sessed at rates as high as. or higher
than, the duties paid on the clean content
of woods actually imported. They should
be reduced and so adjusted to the rate
on wool as to bear their proper proportion
to the real rate levied on the actual wool
imports
Some Duties Prohibitcry.
The duties on many classes of wool
manufacture are prohibitory and greatly
in excess of the difference in cost of pro-
duction here and abroad. This is true of
tops. of yarns with the exception of
worsted yarns of very high grade), and
OF low and medium grade cloth of heavy
weight
On tops up to " cents pound In value.
and on yarns of 65 cents in value, the
rate is 100 per cent, with correspondingly
higher rates for lower values. On cheap
and medium grade cloths, the existing
rates frequently run to $50 per cent and
on some cheap goods to over 200 per
cent.
On the other hand, the findings show
that the duties which run to such high and
valorem equivalents are prohibitory since
the goods are not imported, but that the
prices of domestic fabrics are not raised
by the full amount of duty. On set of
one yard samples of 16 English fabrics.
present tariff rates, 1t was found that the
total foreign value was SALSA; the duties
which would have been assessed had these
fabrics been imported, $3.50: the foreign
value plus the amount of the duty. $l1S.74:
or nominal duty of 1873 per cent In fact,
however, practically Identical fabrics OF
domestic make sold at the same time at
S69.75 showing an enhanced price over the
foreign market value of but 81 per cent.
Would Reduce Duties.
Although these duties do not increase
prices of domestic goods by anything like
their full amount, 1t Is none the less true
that such prohibitive duties eliminate the
possibility of foreign competition. even in
time of scarcity. so that they form temp
taton to monopoly and conspiracy to con-
troll domestic prices; that they are much
in excess of the difference in cost of pro-
duction here and abroad, and that they
should be reduced to point which &C
cords with the principle.
The findings of the board show that in
this industry the actual manufacturing
cost aside from the question of the price
of materials, is much higher in this coun-
try than it is abroad: that in the making
of yarn and cloth the domestic wooden
and worsted manufacturer has in general
no advantage in the form of superior ma
chinery or more efficient labor to offset
the higher wages paid in this country.
The finds show that the cost of turning
wool into yarn in this country Is about
double that in the leading competing
country, and that the cost of turning yarn
into cloth is somewhat more than double.
Under the protective policy great indus
try. involving the welfare of hundreds OF
thousands of people has been established
despite these handicaps.
In recommending revision and reduc-
ton ] therefore urge that action be ta-
l. -s.xx1 fINn and
that an important and established indus
try may not be jeopardized.
The tariff board reports that no equita-
BILE method has been found to levy purely
specific duties on wooden and worsted Fab
RIGS, and that, excepting for compensa-
tory duty, the rate must be ad valorem
on such manufactures. 1t is important TO
realize, however, that no fiat ad valorem
rate on such fabrics can be made to work
fairly and effectively. Any single rate
which is high enough to equalize the DIFF
ference in manufacturing cost at nome
and abroad on highly finished goods IN
volving such labor would be prohibitory
on cheaper goods, in which the labor COST
is a smaher proportion of the total value.
Conversely, y. rate only adequate to equal
lie this difference on cheaper goods woulc
remove protection from the fine goods
manufacture, thu increase In which has
been one of the striking features OF the
trade development in recent years.
therefore recommend that in any revisior
the Importance of a graduated scale OF &C
valorem duties on cloths be carefully con-
sidered and applied
Praises Work of Committee.
/ venture to say that no legislative
body has eyer had presented to II more
complete and exhaustive report tban this
on so difficult and complicated subject
IL lana
the world over 1t is q monument to the
thoroughness, industry, impartiaHty and
accuracy of the men engaged in Its ma
king They were chosen from BOTH polit-
zeal parties, but have allowed nj PARTISAN
spirit to prompt or control their INQUIRIES.
They are unanimous in their findings l
feel sure that after the report nan been
printed and studied the value OF ruch
compendium of exact knowledge in re-
spect to this schedule of the tariff will
convince all of the wisdom of making
such q board permanent, in order that
II may treat each schedule of the karir
as II has treated this, and then keep Its
bureau of information up to date with
current changes in the economic. world.
1t is no part of the function Of the tar
iff board to propose rates of duty. Their
function is merely to present findings or
fact on which rates of duty may be fairly
determined in the light or adequate
knowledge in accordance with the eco
nonic policy to be followed. This is what
the present report does.
The findings of fact by the board snow
ample reason for the revision downward
of schedule K, in accord with the pro-
tective principle, and present the oata
as to relative costs and prices from Whlcn
NAV be determined what rates Will talry
eoualize the difference in production costs.
1 recommend that such revision be pro-
ceeded with at once.
(Sgned) WILLIAM "a. Lar -
The White House. Dec. 20. 1911.