Bismarck daily tribune. [volume] (Bismarck, Dakota [N.D.]) 1881-1916, 1911-05-01


officers simply civil action There can
removal of these officers because one
grade to the other want to call your 10 M
unless the accused
requires jury required the court
jury to be enpaneo anu
them Challenges shall De allowed ana "
jury in civil action the
charge civil action tried by the
the verdict the jury shall De guilty.
not guilty. shall be awarded etc.
section will see that in the case OF
an attempt Office DO they
proceedings this we're criminal proceeans
gentlemen John Cowan would be entitled to De ea
provides that the right OF a os
shall be sacred to all and remain nVoae and TINS were ~
him because ne would De
trial by jury Again. no person shall be twice
put jeopardy shall twice be put in
being tried this court
him guilty guilty. you have the right
penalty which follows If find MIN guilty or
Cowan can be
tried single charge
that here in this proceeding THIS were criminal
Cowan filed against him in Ramsey
charges set forth the articles OF mpeac
conviction former acquia and they cou
not try claim then John Cowan
place for the onens
which impeachment Now, the statute
had determined by
tried again the ordinary tribunals OF justice
m ao o o1nsoe which are set forth here in the articles of
criminal proceeding there is an arrest
John F. Cowan simply served with
could where when he pleased Was there any bail
him? He did need unless he wanted TO-
Minnesota and after gentlemen had call
him return? Could you bring
here In criminal action the defendant can De brought eoe w o
of justice and tried.
No. gentlemen of determ
lining hold the office OF
whether he that ALL That is the only
determination here whether he fit person hold
that connection gentlemen OF
public and the who has office
office the suffrage of the people
of his community people perform
that office honoraby
honestly fairly the duties of that office in the
and John Cown has failed to
do that Them he Or2ite his O
gentlemen outline the in which ex
this expect if my time
all the specifications which are set FORTH
intend hrst to take up the various ac's OF p''"e o ~
specified which, the constitute independent
then intend to take the unspeed instances
of drunkenness and then will take up IN connection with os various
question of habua drunkenness which set
charge and will cite to you the law upon
question claim that the various acts
sufficient find habiua ntemper
has exhibited himself exhibit
him determine from his ap
exhibition mental caiber whether not
dnkard don't contend that John cowan now is
claim that What do claim this
gentmn the habit Of drinking intoxicating
intoxicated to
degree mental and
the district bench administering justice while
in That what claim We don't
all the time We don't contend that but we will
produce show that under
guilty abiua drunkenness it is shown that
intoxicated cae eight times in another dur
ing whole
handled the question of nocaion that u.s. habu
specified instances of noxa
when John F. Cowan went into
there that he violated
public and that he In grant
selling intoxicating
he had himself bought Of hem
those permits and
learned when he did know that
liquors contrary law was his duty
cancel those permits.
and intend further that he violated
He issued injuncon order against
there himself violated his
purchasing liquors of those various druggists
with the drug oes-l am Just giving an out
finished with the drug stores Will take
certificates which issued
Code and filed with the state
John F. Cowan made OF those
This of the statute 40
this but there is section
officer who is authorized to
certificate containing
statement, guilty of a misdemeanor
After have certificates with
delayed which have been SHOWN
to that regard gentlemen that