The Bottineau courant. (Bottineau, Bottineau County, N.D.) 1895-1929, 1911-03-03
COURT GRIND CONTINUES
Large Number OF Cases Disposed Of
During the Past Week.

/ last weeks Cnurant went to
press, brought in a verdict for
the defendants and for the dis
i missal of the action. kadletz
sued for $40, 600, alleging false
arrest at the time the norali-
ty' wave struck Antlcr durin 9
the summer Of 1909. KadIetz
has asked for q stay of proceed
ings for sixty days. He may
decide to appeal the case to the
supreme court.
The case of the Shadbolt &
Boyd Iron company VS.. II. n.
Guerin and JOS. Fish was dccid-
ed by the jury in favor OF the
plaintiff and damages assessed
at $lA2.98.
The case of &. L. Broderson
VS.. NJ. B. Kotgaard was deCid-
ed in favor Of the plaintiff, the
defendant being in default.
The case Of Gerhard Grey,
plaintiff and respondent, VS..
Paul Martin, defendant and
appellant, was dismissed by
stipulation.
In the case of the Lille Lun-
Der company VS.. the State
Bank of Maxbass it was stipu-
lated that the case be tried to
the court without jury.
The case of the state of
North Dakota VS.. John w.
George was continued over the
term, as was also the case of
T. A. Gray VS.. Harry Bennett
and Mrs. Anna Bennett ct al.
A continuance was granted
in the case of Frank N. Miller
VS.. Chas. and Anna Porter >et
al.
In the case of the NaXbass
Security bank VS.. O. l.. Rogers,
judgment was rendered in fa-
vor of the plaintiff III the
amount of $541. 81, the plaintiff
to execute a satisfaction of
mechanics lien in the action
af Stoltze VS.. Rogers.
The Northwestern Port Hur-
on company was given judg-
ment against Henry and Ed
ward Boehnke.
The case of Henry Holz VS..
Collins Bros. was continued
over the term on payment of
costs by defendant.
In the case of J. l.. Living
stone VS.. c. p. Hidden a con-
tinuance was granted at the
request of the plaintiff.
In the case of Mike Manning
VS.. II. II. Perry, the complaint
was amended SO as to include
Dan Manning as plaintiff. Per-
ry as a drover took up stock
belonging to the plaintiffs.
The jury returned verdict
for the plaintiff, assessing
damages at $1OO, and also as
sessed a special fine of 500.
The court directed a verdict
for $111O.25 for the plaintiff in
the case of the First National
bank of Westhope VS.. u. S.
McCann.
! In the case of S. H. Severins
VS.. N. H. McKinnon, sheriff of
Bottineau county, the jury
found for the defendant and
for the dismissal of the action.
Severins G. | m d that he
bought certain property siezed
by the sheriff from Shonaman.
The sheriff claimed the sale
was fraudulent and the jury
took this view of the matter
and rendered verdict for the
dismissal of the action.
The case of Wolf Bros. q
company VS.. J. V. l.. HillDot
was continued over the tern
by stipulation.
The case of George McMilli1
vs.. S. WestaCott was tried the
first of the week. The CASE
grew out of the sale of stallion
by Mr.. Westacott to a company
of farmers in McMillin's neigh
borhood. McMillin was one O.
the partners in the company
and had transferred to Westa
colt six horses as payment o
!. his share. Later, claiming
that the animal sold by Westa
colt to the company did no
come up to Steve's representa-
tions, McMillin replevined thu
horses he had given Westacot
and brought the suit to deter
mine ownership. After hear
ing the evidence the jury ren
dered a verdict in favor of Nc
: Millin for the recovery of tn
E property or in lieu thereof tn
sum of $3.50.
The case of Carl Bergquis