The Greenville journal. [volume] (Greenville, Ohio) 1850-1918, 1911-05-04

rate, whereas every other country is showing
decrease"
They pointed out that the European mines are
deep and beset with many dangers are not
troubled with, while our mines are easy and
should be safe to work. because the veins are
large and thick and run horizontally. And yet they
showed where we kill four times as many men as
France.
This is the condition of our comparatively safe
mines of today but as they showed, we are now
beginning for the first time in the history of coal
mining in this country to open veins that real
ly dangerous. We the very threshold of a
new and far more hazardous period in coal mining,
and, unless take active measures. going
to have a series of mine explosions which will
appal us-even if there are no Americans killed.
Out of the report they made has grown the
Pittsburg testing station Of the department Of
mines which is now taking up the most serious
cause of mine explosions-electricity. There would
be objection TO electricity under proper condi-
tions, but the difficulty with 1t at the present time
is that the electrical machinery sparks In a
gaseous or dusty mine, given the right conditions,
and it needs only a spark to kill every in It,
1t should be used only in mines where there is nc
chance OF the accumulation Of gas; but, In point
of fact it has been adopted most generally by tha
mine operators of the gas belt" Of Western Penn
sylvania and West Virginia In all that country
there is any telling where gas will be struck
next; and the cutting machines, which work ahead
and are most likely to open gas pockets, are oper-
ated by electric dynamOs which are constantly "at
the face of the coal. Formerly it the rule
and in some states the law to bore ahead and test
for gas pockets, but with the modern electric cut.
ting machines all such precautions out of the
question.
The case against electricity, when used for pow
er, is the most serious consideration in the whole
of the coal mining situation. because it has made
coal production cheaper and, on that account no
matter how many deaths it causes it would be
extremely difficult to DIVE it out of the dangerous
coal fields. The saving averages about three
cents ton. but here is an instance Of the lengths
to which operators have gone to make that miser
able profit: When the dangers from electricity
began to be understood, its use permitted only
in mines where open lights were safe So the op
orators to dodge the law, tore out their covered
lights and sent men into gaseous mines with fam.
ing torches in their hats. Then. until some terrific
accident happened, the mine inspectors we're 81
fenced.
Perhaps We not to blame the coal operators
for reducing the cost of production to the lowest
possible point but when they do so at the present
tremendous cost of human life it Is high time they
feel the stern hand of regulation. So far however
they have always been able to prevent the real
cause of some of the worct disasters being laid to
electricity. definite cause, in any event. is an
adherence to them. For If the blame can be
placed on the operating machinery of mine it
opens the way to damage suits, contingency the
coal operators adopts at escaping
This whole situation was never better shown
than in the terrific disaster at Monongah No s. in
West Virginia, which had the longest death list
in the history of American coal mining The acci-
dent occurred on December 6, 1907, Immediately
after trip of fifteen loaded mine cars liberated
by the breaking of an iron coupling pin had run
back twelve hundred feet on an eight per cent
grade, raising thick cloud of dust and ending by
causing short circuit in the electric current But
when it came to fixing the cause, electricity was
hardly considered, fact that is particularly note
worthy, the decision was severely criticized aft
erwards in engineering journals
Testimony that tended to prove that electricity