The Salt Lake tribune. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1890-current, 1911-03-05

territory This amendment lost. SO to q.
Mr.. Holman moved that section % be
shows or any other form Of exhibition;
This brought Mr.. Funk to his feet u
want TO make blunt statement" said
ment whatever to this bill. I do not
want 1t to go back to the senate"
WELL" remarked Mr.. Allison. ~ TINS
bin has to be forwarded to & {ne govsspae gSnsspess
we have here. II seems TO me thaI we
are being, driven to Xete for ot some5ni9lg s,mnlg
that we know very little ABOUT siihpi'
because a majority wants 1t
Henrie Arouses Ire.
Mr.. Heurie declared that he did NOT
propose to vote for any amendment
which he considered useless and when
looked Inconsistent to him, as did the
amendment proposed by MT HoiInah'
cere in the matter, while Mr.. Henrie and
others contended that picture shows ana
other similar forms OF exhibition we're
Mr. Holman sought to amend. Mr., Hen
rie again referred to inconsistent amena
mcnts and Mr.. Holman. Jumping TO ms
feet, declared that there wasn't mar nan
in the house big enough TO charSe MIN
MIR. Henrie explained that he had not
intended to accuse Mr.. Holman OF lncon-
slstency: but had merely said that the
amendment looked inconsistent to him.
This closed the incident and Mr. Hol-
mans amendment lost. .,.
Mr. Norris then moved that section
10 be so amended as to compel retail
druggists to keep their prescriptions or
file so that they would be open TO In
spectlon at all times by peace ofhcers
II was urged by Mr.. Henrie and otln IN
ers that this was covered In the OIL
and Mr., Morrls's amendment lost.
Mr. Packard at this critical 1uncture
moved the previous question. The vote
Co., % lN.. ~
Pope not voting. Objection was made
to Mr.. Pope being excused and he then
voted in the affirmative. making the vote
21 to 10 in favor OF the previous Ques-
ton.
The roll was then called upon the lna'
passage Of the bill and was as follows
Yeas--Anderson, Bickmore: Grape
PahIquist Day EsFd1X HenrIe moman
Kearns, Langston, Meeks. Miller, Pack
ard Pope, Richardson, Sanderson, Seely
Spencer, Thornley,. Tobias. Wootton and
Nays-Alison. Cole. Elsman. Harsh
berger, Hines. Jones. Madsen. McRae
Morris, Ncbeker. Peterson, Russell, We'll
ling: Woolley: ziemer-l5 .,.
Whites.
Holman voted NO" on the bill on the
roll call but changed his vote to Yes be-
fore the result was announced. and gave
notice that he would make a motion for
reconsideration Monday.
Why They Voted "No.'
Following are the reasons, given by
majority of those who voted mo-
Allison-Objected to rallroading and
thought the house should have had time
to consider the bill.
Cole-Not sufficiently acquainted with
the provisions and was not given an op-
portunity to study measure.
Holman-Because the action Of the ma
iority was shameful and the bill had been
railroaded with some special end in view
Morris-Because gag rule had been ap-
piled, the same as IL had been two years
ago. and because the action OF the ma
jorlty was an outrage In furtherance OF
some scheme.
Nebcker-Because the majority ap-
pearcd to be afraid TO have the bill dis
cussed and insisted on railroadins It.
Weling-For the reason that the meas
ure had not been submitted 10 the people
OF the state, coupled with the statement
that the men who were voting for the
bill voted for statewide prohibition two
years ago.
Russell-Because he was opposed TO tho
10 O'Clock closing provision. and the bill
had not been amended In that regard.
McRae-Becausc he had not been con-
vlnced OF the consistency OF the measure