The Salt Lake tribune. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1890-current, 1911-02-22
SENATE HEARS HISS
FOR INITIAL TINE
Gallery Thus Replies to Texas
Senator's RetOrt to
Applause.
Continued from Page One.

new arrangement will give the Indiana
senator the close of the discussion unless
someone assumes the responsibility for
prolongne ii to make reply 10 him.
Toward the close of the BereridEe
speech. Mr.. Galllnger irterrogated Mr..
Beveridge as to the source OF the money
been used in the I-orimer election Mr..
Beveridge replied 1t had been received
from Brown. Broderick and Wilson.
But where did Brown, Broderick and
Wilson got it, persisted Mr.. Galiinger.
Band of Liars
Mr. Beveridge confessed he did not
know. and 10 assist him somewhat the
New Hampshire senator suggested that
as the men who had confessed TO receiV-
ing the money were a band OF mars no
one could tell whether there was any
foundation for their charges In this In
stance.
In this connection Mr.. Bailey under
took To show that nothing had developed
to connect Mr.. Lormer with the use Of
money in the election. He said II was
a curious fact that this was the first
there had been no effort to show The
source from which the money alleged
to have been used had been derived
MIR. Crawford said:
1T makes no difference where the
money came from, II 1t WAS used for
corrupt purposes and an election resulted
from its USE
a burst OF applause resounded from
visitors that demonstrations OF tho kind
are not permitted by the senate.
Hiss Follows Retort
OH exclaimed Mr. Bailey. who ac-
copied tho manifestation as against his
position, '1t Is fair measure OF the
intelligence OF the audience"
Then the hiss was heard.
Saying there was not a scintilla Of
evidence connecting Mr. Lorimer with
he charge OF bribery, Mr.. Bailey asked
Mr. Beveridge II he believed Brown
Broderick and Wilson had supplied the
money, and the Indiana senator replied
in the negative, expressing the opinion
II had been furnished TO them.
The Texas senator then said that If
possession OF Holstlaw. Beckemeyer. Link
and White. It's source easily could have
been traced. No effort had been made.
he i'd. to show that cents had been
dra wD from Lorlmcrs bank. and he
argued that II money had been used for
Mr.. Lorimer the bank books would have
shown this fact.
of common sense declared MIR. craw- W.
ford, inlerrupting the Texan. "The
the He' He 'oSf IS that aSms bnss
who profted by the transaction furnished
the money
Mr. Bailey was just as complimentary
When the senator suggests a resort
To the rules of common sense. he should
not violate such rules himself ne said.
assumed that money had been used. as
the witnesses had charged. which he did
not believe to have been the case
Not Dream, But Lie.
Then" said Mr., Beveridge. 1T was
all "a dream
No. not dream. it was all a lle."
responded Mr. Bailey
Does not the senator believe that
Hoistlaw deposited the $500 as appears
in cvidence?" Mr.. Bailey was asked by
Mr.. Bcvcridge, and he promptly replied
.hat he did not.
What motive could have prompted
the testimony" the Ipdianan demanded
The same motive that caused others
TO want TO destroy Mr. Lorimer's char
actcr.' was Balley's explanation.
At this point Mr. Bcveridge introduced
an affidavit from Jarvis Newton chief
clerk OF the Chicago state bank. together
with A Photographic copy OF the famous
deposit slip. Mr.. Bailey promptly seized
the opportunity 10 obtain consent to the
publication of tho slip in the Congress
sionsi Record. for. the purpose of sustain
ing as he said his charge OF forgery.
Mr.. Cunimins advanced the theory that
the money, said TO have been used In the
election OF Mr., Lormcr. had had origin
similar 10 that Of the famous Jack poi.
An adjournment was then taken for the
dav