The Celina Democrat. (Celina, O. [Ohio]) 1895-1921, 1911-07-21

! VY-I7iW en- side by side with the
! NtS5XY proceedings Of state
GH legislatures. or more par
4 Il uoltt,ooI raetp,.,y psrtv porr1'' conyep. wen
tions. present pictures Of
curious contrasts.
One Ohio Republican state conven-
tion endorsed Ia strong words the ad-
mlnistrauon and deeds OF Theodore
Roosevelt who then was president
In the same platform which gave the
president his endorsement thorC We're
words OF the strongest commeudation
for Senator Joseph Benson Foraker
and his work in the senate OF the
United States.
The platform therefore expressed
appreciation OF the legislative efforts
OF two men. calmly Ignoring tho fact
that one OF them was seeking 20 pre-
vent the doing OF that which the o,l-
er wanted 10 have done The resolu-
lions Of the convention were iuslu-
cere either Ia one cuse or the other
and the historian must take his
choice.
Senator Foraker was one Of the
strongly picturesque men in tho sen.
ate Of the United states. lie was
strong in speech and Ia political and
parliamentary methods, and he was
picturesque in manner and appear
nce. He was nervousiy energetic
and as watchful as a lynx He was
the head and front Of the Republican
opposition in the senate to the rail
road legislation which had the in
dorsement of President Roosevelt
Senator Foraker, In fact was the tire
less enomy of :he measure. He knew
that he was espousing a losing cause,
but II there had been hope that the
measure might be defeated he could
not have been more constant in his
attendance at the sessioa4 when the
bill was under consideration, nor
more alert at every instant Of time
to raise some point tending to
strengthen his own line Of belief and
Of argument
To one who lacked all knowledge OF
the ways of Ohio politics it would
have appeared that Senator Foraker
was facing the certain condemnation
of his constituents by his course of
antagonism to his party and to the
president. From the words that came
to Washington from Ohio it appeared
practically certain that the people Of
the state who held no corporation af-
fliations we're like the same classes
Of people in other states-determined
advocates of railroad regulating meas
ures.
Other senators who were as bitter
ly opposed personally to the legisla-
ton as was Senator Foraker paid
heed TO the feeling at home and voted
for the bill. The Ohio senator seem
ed to gain strength in opposition
from every message that came over
the Allegheny mountains telling him
that he was taking the unpopular
side. Mr.. Foraker's attitude had in It
more than a suspicion of defiance.
He was in the thick Of the fight
from the day that the Hepburn bill
reached the floor of the senate until
the hour when it was put upon its
passage His long speech IN opposi-
ton to the measure was one of the
greatest speeches which he had ever
delivered. It was eloquent. 1t was
based upon premises which by the
speakers art was made to appear
sound, and the listening laymen might !
well have been almost persuaded"
that all the right and the reason and |
the logic we're with the cause Of the !
senator from Ohio.
It was a long speech which Mr.. |
Foraker made, but its interest made |
the time speed on its way. He was !
not content with the one utterance. |
At different times during the debate
he rose to combat the statements of
some Of his colleagues, and at every
such time he spoke vehemently and
we'll.
President Roosevelt during the
months of agitation over railroad rate
matters said some things which made
it appear strongly that he felt that
men who opposed legislation which
he favored were not likely to have
the countenance of their constituents.
He lived to see a convention of his
party declare practically that he was
right, and the men who we're diamet-
rically opposed to him also were right.
The Republican party in Ohio sue
ceeded in framing resolutions that