The Washington herald., 1911-03-07
DISTRICT COURTS.
Court OF Appeals.
Prescnt-Au

Prescnt-An
Admissions-John j.. Mcdonnell. George NJ. vii
maith. Daniel e. MullCney. Thomas X. Fitzgerald
Edward Thomas, Thomas Il. Shoemaker.
| No. 2s6 TIrnbuckle Wright; death CT aP
pelant ard appointment Of Edward y. Hopcwell
as administrator suggested and said administrator
made party appellant. on motion of Mr.. W. q.
Gardiner. attorney for appellant
No. 273. United States rel Rcw-H Us.
2257. United States vs.. Anti Kamnia Chemical
| Company; Tatent appeal No. COS. Ruling vs.
Lowry; continued.
No. 28. Davis vs.. United States; No. 2s4
| Miller VS.. United States; and No. 2i7 Shocnake
| Company vs.. Munsey; placed at foot Of calendar.
No. Z6a. Rudolph ct al MosenVal; argu-
! nent cUnmenced by Mr.. F. II. stephens for ap-
Pelants. continued by Mr. Il. H. McNein for
appellants
No. 2Z53 Adriaans ys. Dill ct al; argument
| commenced by Mr.. 7. L. Jcfords for appellant.
continued by Mr.. d. W. McDunoshue. concluded
No. Zr78. Bride VS. Reeves ct al; decree as
! tn Agnes Reeves affirmed; to other debts. re-
Tcrsed. Opinion by Air. Chief Justice Shepard.
No 2ll. United States Trust Company vs.
David, receiver; affirmed. Opinion by Mr.. Justice
Robb
No. 2IO2 Warner vs. Baker; reversed and re
manded with inst nctiOns 70 arrest Judgment
Opinion by Mr.. Justice Van Orsdel.
No 2S Philadelphia, Baltimore and Wash
! ington Railroad Company VS.. schubert; affirmed
OIinion by Mr.. Chief Justice Shepard
Opinin by Mr.. Justice Robb
No 2l77. District Of Columbia Washington
Justice Van Orsdcl. Mr.. Justice RObb dissenting
in part
fTmed. Opinion by Mr.. Chief Justice Shepard
No 26l. Iowa Apartment House Company vs..
Herschel; affirmed. Opinion by Mr.. Justice Robb
No 2z. Yates VS. Yates; affirmed. Opinion
BY Mr. Justice Van Orsde
No Pal Robinson ct al. Hiilman ct al
reversed. Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice shepard
NO.' 2l8l. Smith ct al. Gardiner. admins
traitor affirmed. Opinion by Mr.. Justice Robb.
No Z28. Buchett administrator. Peale; az
frmed. Opinion by Mr.. Justice Van Orsde.
No 2s5. Cabuth vs.. Great Atlantic and Pacific
Tea COMPANY; affirmed Opinion BY Mr.. Justice
Robb
No Psi. Croft. &c. Us Croft ct al; affirmed
Opinion by Mr.. Justice Van Oraiel.
No ZIG. Davis ". United States; half hour
additional allowed each side
No 2l76. Campbell ~. Northwest lexington
Improvement Company et al. appeal to Supreme
Court prayed by Mr.. John Ridout. attorney for
appellant. and bond for costs il sum Of $40
approved
No 2l9i George vs.. Ford; motion fer rrhearing
denied Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Shepard:
No ZD2 Robinson ct al. VS.. Heilman ct al
sane Opinion PER eIriam.
No. 65 Griffith BrEIne; affirmed Opinion
By Mr.. Justice Van Orsdel.
No. "a. !. 4. Says. Schn Go. vs.. Hall
Ruckam; reversed Opinion By Mr.. Chief Justice
No $50 MiIlrr vs. spclcr; affirmed. Opinion
by Mr.. Chief Justice Shepard.
No 676 Star Brewery Company W. Val Blatz
brewing Company affirmed. Opinion BY Mr.. Chd
No. eel Muralo Company vs.. National Lad
Company: reversed. Opir-un by MI Chief JUSTICE
no. 675. Curtis vs.. Iindmark; No 20 Lind
s.rom - Amcs: No 70I. In re application al
Edrlr II. CottreII; Nos 10 and 20 Townsend Is.
Copeland ard Copeland vs.. Townsend; No. 90.
In rr application Of Charles II. TallmadGc; No.
7lS Mcintyre W Perry; No. Ill. Dicknan vs.
Burnc: continued.
No G6 IadnF ". DemEe,er Grants four five.
and six reversed Opinion by Mr.. Chief Justice
Shepard.
and three reversed. Opinion by M Chief Jus
tice Shcpnui.
No. SIS LAdoT vS Dsmps,r-; reversed Opinion
BY Nj Chief Justice Shepard
No. $50 Dernpstcr ". TadoT; affirmed Opinion
by Mr. Chief Justice shepard
Assignments for March ::
No nsO lee ct al v. Wclch ct Al. Attorneys.
Keigwin & Davis-pavidEe.
No ss1 Magrudrr vs.. Drrry Ct a. Att0rneys.
Wilson & Wilson Darlington.
No ~. Pride KkeT. Attorneys, HaILain'
Hallam-O 'CallaEhan Bride
No 25a. American REALTY C0m7any Va ThonI-
kins Attorneys, Birney & Wooiard-DarhngtOn
Wolf.
No. c27o National Metropolitan Bank VS.. Lin
coin. Attorney Rllston.
No. ~. BIutherthaI & Beckart vs.. Arlington
Bewins Company. Attorneys. Wh'Atey-baiiey d
Special caIcrdar:
No. ,. Davis vs. United stctcs. Attorneys. Davis
Wilson.
No. 6. Mfrcr rs United States. Attorneys. Davis
& Iaskcy-WikCn.
No. 2s6. Hilton vs. Rackcy. Attorneys. Fadsctt-
Mackev.