The Detroit times. [volume] (Detroit, Mich.) 1903-1920, 1911-08-19
INCOMPATIBILITY DEEMED
GROUND FOR DIVORCE
tContlna.d from page ~.

he became angry, according to the
statement given TO Judge Murfin by
Attorney Gallagher, and forced her to
give II TO chambermaid in the hote!
where they were staying. Because
Mrs. Fieldhouse commented on the
witty remarks made by the "spieler"
on q ''rubberneck" wagon ~ New
York, her husband became violently
angry at her also and threatened to
make a scene.
Fieldhouse declared, she attended q
circus with her husband, and sat be-
side an elderly gentleman. He en-
dyed the performance nightly and
during the performance would turn
occasionally and make some remark
regarding the performers to her. Mr..
Fleldhouse was furious and forced her
to change seats with him to get her
away from the mirthful old gentle
man.
While in the Victoria hotel. in New
York, on their honeymoon, Mrs. Field
house says in her complaint, she re-
marked that she greatly admired Will
lam Jennings Bryan. Her husband at
OhIC OC6dI w hCt NA6OAOuoiy
for expressing such an opinion, and
he began to argue with her lin such a
foolish and unreasonable manner over
the matter" she was forced to pacify
him by stating that she did not ad-
mire Bryan,
Another time when the author found
her In possession of David Copper
field" which had been given to her by
a friend, he forced her to destroy Ne
book Once, while attending a the
alter, she remarked that she admired
one OF the actors. and after they had
returned home, her husband, she says,
kept her. awake the greater part OF
the night. nagging and tantalizing her
because Of her remark.
Attorney Patrick Kelaher repre-
sented Fieldhouse.
Joseph F. Harper testified that he
and his wife, Kate, were married In
Washington, d. c., in 1882, but one
day. when he returned home, he found
that she had burned his clothing.
why did she do THAR" asked Judge
Muffin.
II don't know, unless Ii was be-
cause | went to a show the night be-
fore with young man and she didn't
CO." replied Harper.
Because Harper did not have any
witnesses to corroborate his testi-
mony, the court continued his case un-
til communication can be had with
members Of his family. who now re-
side in Washington.
Minnie frost testified that her hus.
band, William, had struck her regu-
larly twice a week for 81 years and
that she stood it until her youngest
child became Of age, when she separ-
ated from him. A decree was granted.
Imre Joo was given a divorce after
having testified that his wife, Anna,
left him then went and purchased
enough furniture on his credit. to fur,
nish another house in which to live
with another man.
Judge Muffin granted DEGREES in the
following cases: Laura vs.. George
Slotter, non-support; William VI.
Ethel Smith, cruelty; Ida VS.. Edward
Rutz. non-support; May VS.. George
Duggan. desertion:. Nellie vs.. Adolp,.
Click, non-supp5rt; Wilhelmina vs..
Irwin Workley, cruelty. and Alma VS..
Harry Roach, non-support
Judge Donovan granted DEGREES TO
the following: Daisy vs.. Thomas
Powell, desertion; Elizabeth VS.. Will
lam G. Bodinus, cruelty; Ida L. VS..
Robert II. Harrison, non-support;
Pearly Va. Frank Bruce, cruelty: En-
ma vs.. James Hart. non-support; Ma
bel VS.. Ciummel Lambert (eolored)
non-support; Coldwell vs.. Louise Dan
Tel, cruelty: Carrie VS.. Henry Bar
cone, non-support; Margaret vs. Ed
ward Kelly, non-support. and Lucille
VS. William belong (colored). deser-
ton.
The following new suits for divorce
were aled Saturday: Anna vs.. Frank
Crandall, Edward w. vs.. - Wren,
and James vs.. Susan McLardie.