The Washington herald., 1911-05-14
DAILY COURT RECORD
Saturday, May 1S, 1911
DISTRICT COURTS.
Court of Appeals.

Court OF Appeals.
Present-An
Patent appeals:
al; argument commenced by Mr.. H H. Singleton
FOR appellants. continued b. Mr.. r. g. Whitehead
for Commissioner Of Patents. concluded BY Mr.. W.
H. Singleton for appellants
No. 7ls. In re APPLICATION Of Daniel b. Luteu
argument commenced By Mr.. F. II. DruIy for ap
pelant. continued BY Mr.. W. 8. Ruckman for Com
missioner Of Patents. concluded by Mr.. r. II. Drur,
for appellant.
Adjourned from day to day until May . and al
endar suspended until the first Monday in Octobsr.
Equity Court No. 4.
\ JUSTICE STAFFORD.
No. 3D61. Bell VI. Bell: reference to examiner
Attorneys, D. Wolfe. w. Offutt.
No. 106l. Hersey Vs. Hersey: same. Attorneys
H. l. Quinn and T. r. F1tzgerald-I. J. COstigan.
No. 1854 Mctisrrey ". Mct;srvey: same. Attor
neys, J. 7. sheHter and A. L. Newmyer-C. A. Bar
nard.
No. eeT. woodson Va woodsou: same. Attor
neys A. L. Newmycr-B. l. Gaskins aud Jabez Lee
No seio HOPKINS vs. HOPKINS: rule Of Februar,
II continued and rule March II discharged. Attor
neys W. NJ. Ellisn-E. w. r. Ewing
No. 1865. Feutou vs schamel; report Of receive,
referred to auditor. Attorneys. W. J. Bacon and
NJ. NJ Doyle-H. @. Kimball.
No. 0lD. Dime Messenger Service N. Rawlings E,
a.; defendants enjoined from doing business under
the name Of Tho District Dime Messenger Ssvics. "
Attorneys. J. A Toomey and v. L. Toumey-N.
BowAS
No. Dsa Grit.s VI Secretary Of Interior ct Al.
demurrer sustained: bill dismissed; appeal noted
injunction modified. Attorneys. W. II. Robson.
J. Hemphill, d. d. Henderson, Q. @. Calhoun
Lawler, Clements & Wright
Circuit Court No. 4.
JUSTICE ANDERSON.
No. 1885 Craig. administrative. -. Parish. az
AtfOrneys. f.
W. Hackett-Holmes Conrad and Leigh Robinson
Assignments for May Is:
torneys Abert-Thomas
No. 81. Rsuscher vs., Rauscher. Attorneys. Har
grove asby-Smith-Thomas & White.
No. 100. Lord vs. Capital Traction Company. At
torneys. wiams-Perry & Son and Dunlop.
No. 1l. vinson VS.. Capital Traction Company
Attorneys. Gittings Chamberlin-Perry Son and
Dunlop.
No. se Kinsla VS.. Same. Attorneys. Lishtfoot-
Perry & Son and Dunlop.
No. M. Kingla May. Attorneys. Gordon 4
Gordon-Balderston Haloway.
No. 9s. johnson VS.. Barton. Attorneys. Lambert
& Yeatman-Glassie.
No. I'll Rhodes vs. Barrett. Attorneys. Ralston
Siddons & Rachardson-wilson 4 Barksdale
No. 3l7. Helm Washington Railway and Elec
trio Company. Attorney. Dutton & Maddox-Dar
lington.
No. aal. Butler vs.. Same Attorneys. Webb q
Forrest-Dariington.
Circuit Court No. z
JUSTICE BARNARD.
Assignments for May Is:
No. 40 Durland vs. Washington Post Company
Attorneys. Tucker. Kenyon & Mechanically. J.
Lambert.
No. 81 Peoples National Bank vs.. Winship e,
al. Attorneys. McNcin & McNeill-wilson 4 Barts
dale.
No. 352- Smith vs.. CAPITAL Tnctiou Company
Attorneys. Gardiner-Perry & Son and Dunlop.
No. S2 Brown Golden Co. Attorneys
Berry. Downing & Jerords-Darlneton 4 johnson.
No. so. Dixon Va Great Falls and Old Dominion
Railway Company. Attorneys. Mahcr 4 McMahon-
Lambert.
No. SO. Same - Same. Attorneys. same.
No. Js. Csrew tshoon & Co. Attoeneys
Archer & Smith-Shreve & Richardson.