The Washington herald., 1911-10-13
Equity Court No. 4.
CHIEF JUSTICE CLABAUGH.

CHEF JUSTICE CLABAUGH.
No 3OlU2 Thurman vs.. Thurman ct al; rule re
turnable October 20. Attorneys. P. W. Frsoy-A.
W. Scott
No. aS2 Thompson vs. Thompson; divorces
granted. AttoTneys G. A. MAddo1-ThomAS Rufan-
No. 3s52 In &c umacy) Sidney Lawrence; com
mittee's first account referred to auditor.
No. A59. In re (lunacy) Philip ORourke; com
mittee's account approved
No. 3glo In re Nunacy) August Haas; committee
authorized to purchase promissory note.
No. 3O55. Doody ct al vs.. National Savings and
Trust Company ct al: decree substituting trustee.
Attorneys Hamilton, Yerkes & Hamilton.
No. SOS3 FaTelson vs.. Unknown Heirs of Key
decree pro confesso and reference to examiner At
tOrney c. L. Benjamin.
No. sOO5o o'Connor w. Ough ct al; sale rat-
fed and confirmed nisi. Attorney, D. W. o'DOnO-
ghue-
Assignments for today-Motons:
No T8 bankruptcy. In re Herman EiSeman.
Attorneys. Steaman-LoTing.
No. 5. Davis vs. Davis. Attorneys, Macke5-Kin-
ball.
No. T. Davis vs.. shryock Attorneys. Gittings &
No. II. Krous vs. Krous Attorneys. Doyls-Mur.
ply.
No. Is Hofbeimer vs. Fraser ct al. Attorneys
Rosenberg-Leckie. Cox Kratz-
No. Is. AllswOrth AllSworth ct al Attorneys
Thomas-Gies.
No. 2 In re Uniontown Wharf Company. At
torneys. Raun-Smith. Thomas & Rickett.
No. 81. Woodward VI. Woodward. Attorney Hit
Baker & Jeffords.
No. q. johnson vs.. johnson. Attorneys. JET,
fords-Scott & Thomas
No. g. sleman vs. Mumfori. Attorneys, Leach
& Hillyer-Wheatlcy Ridout-
No. q. Cotton vs. Owen ct al. AHorneyS Forrest
| -Ridout & Shnn.
No. a. seabrOok ~ seabruok. Attorneys. Ham.
| by & Hutchinton.
No. 4. Hodg1ns HodEkins. Attorneys. Mack
| all-Wells
~. II -
Williamson Carington-Benjanin & Sinclair
No. A. Koontz Koontz Attorney. Toomey.
No. 49. Huppel Ts. Nauck. Attorneys BENJAMIN
Callaghan and Topper 4 Gusack-Riiout.
No. 81. Padgett VS.. Padgett. Attorneys, MILAN &
| Smith
No. 50. Amobrossis Society vs. Wilson. Attorneys
Laskcy & Ridout.
Equity Court No. z.
! JUSTICE WRIGHT
! No 1855 Chr Heurich Brewing COMPANY ct al
vs.. FO1: rule returnabe October ls Attorney,
Leon Tobriner.
No $3.50. Goodier ". Goodier. mi. rrtu-n,bI.
October %. Attorney. W. VI. Levin
No. 1904. Monday Morday ct al: dirurcs
granted. Attorneys. David Wolf-J. L. Tppper.
Assignments for to-day-MotioEs:
No. 5. Forrest ct al. vs.. Warlman ct al Attor
neys, Gardiner-DarlinEton & Brandcnhurg.
No. y Kelly vs.. Kelly Attorney. MattinsIy
No. H. McKinmie ct al; vs.. Wilkinson ct al
Attorneys, Ambrose & Ridout-Leckie. Cox &
! Krl,z.
No. 10, Ford Va sheehy ct al. Attorneys. Ridout
| Baker. Sheehy & Hogan.
| No. ls Richards vs. Wynkocp. AttnncyS Will
| iams-DOuglas & Baker.
No. &. Needs executor CurTJ ct al AttOr
neys, Milan & Smith-Dcnnis.
| No. 3. Fraser Porter ct al. Attorney Leckie
Coz & kratz-Behrcnd
No. %. Fowler Fowler. Attorneys, Thompson
Wilson Barksdale-Gertman & Riduut
No. - PadGrtt Padgett. Attorney. Plumey
| No. 81. Hopkins vs.. Hopkins. Attorneys. Ellison
-EmE
No. 36 Burroughs Adding Machine Company vs.
Adder Machine Company. Attorneys, Lewis-Massie
& MorgraTe.
No. p. Merriam '. Van Aukcn. Attorneys
Berry & Mnor-Porc.
No. ~ Cotterin VI. Cottern Attorneys, Gies-
| Amhru%e.
No. -, Thurman vs.. Thurman. Attorneys. Frisby
| Scott.
| NJ. A. Hines vs. Swift ct al. Attorneys Handy
| & Hutchins0n-McNIahon.
| No. 20. Bliss HaTomeycr ct al. Attorneys
Archer & Smith-H,ckcr. Kenyon & Mcfarland.
! No. 43. Hufty vs.. Hufiy. Attorneys. Dahs-
Hoover.
| No. 90 In To Samuel GompCr ct al. Attorneys
| Darlington -Ralstcn. SiddOns & Richardson.
| No. 81. Harens vs.. Yates Ct al. Attorneys, John
son-Baiey Tucker. Kenyon & Macarand
! No. 81 Pratt vs.. Pratt- Attorneys, McNeill-
Hoehling.