The citizen. [volume] (Berea, Ky.) 1899-1958, 1911-06-01
USE or ALCOHOL HEREDITARY
Psthetie story OF Brilliant Lawyer
Who Dlsowned Son When
Charged With Murder.

young man from Roou FANNY
committed an atrocious murder and
was put on trial for his life. His
grandfather had been an excessive
drinker. His father and mother both
drank moderately ut meals. His life
and history indicated great brain
feebleness and degrees OF insanity
for at least two years before the muir
der Public sentiment was very
strong against him at the trial. The
district attorney has employed an
able lawyer to assist him and he pub
.iicly announced that the cause OF JUS
tice demanded the prisoners death.
Two distinguished physicians we're re-
tanned to swear TO the sanity OF the
prisoner. ! was called as an expert
In his defense, says a writer In an
exchange AZ the trial went on II
was evident that the efforts OF the
state would be directed TO break tho
force OF my testimony as to the In
sanity OF the prisoner. answered
the hypothetical question and ex-
planned II at some length for the de-
fense. and then was cross-examinec
by the states attorney. who was evil
IDENTIFY determined to destroy the i'm
preston which had produced on the
jury.
The attorney was a man OF keen In
tellect and a thorough master OF the
art OF examining witnesses. After
trying various methods to create con
fusion IN my statements, he settled
down TO a scientific examination, In
sisting on exact answers without quail
lfications. As the examination pro
crossed IL was evident to both Of US
that we we're surprising each other in
questions and answers. There was In
his questioning unmistakable indica.
tions Of a very clear knowledge OF the
alcoholic mind and method OF reason
| Ing such as can never be described In
books
Although two able physicians we're
seated at his side suggesting ques-
tons, # was evident that his knowl-
edge OF such cases was far superior
to theirs, and the turns and forms OF
questions were revelations OF famil-
Iarity with the subject that was sur
prise to me.
At the close OF the days trial |
concluded that a personal acquaint-
ance with the attorney might give me
an insight into his mentality that
would be to my advantage In the next
| days examination. which after .
night OF consultation and preparation
would undoubtedly be still more Sc
we're. Upon being introduced by the
| Judge. /. In an undertone. remarked
to the attorney that ! had never be
fore been examined by any one who
had such acute knowledge Of the
drink craze and its victims. and that
knew that this knowledge did not
come from books. After a moments
hesitation he answered me with a
quivering lip. Yes. ! know OF this
matter personally in my family and
II has been a skeleton TO me-"
He asked me TO come to his room
at the hotel that evening for a per
sonal talk. The interview lasted until
midnight He then told me Of his
only son who was expelled from col.
lege for drinking. and OF how he had
driven him away from his home
against the advice of his wife. and
that his son was now serving a life
sentence for murder in western
prison. He spoke OF his bitter feel
ings against the attitude his wife had
taken, for she had insisted that the
boy was diseased This he himself
could not believe and he reviewed the
heart burnings and sorrows which
followed the death OF his wife. and
her steadfast faith In the mental
sickness OF the boy. and her disap
prevail of his own harshness; and how
at her death he realized that she waf
right. but his pride and position made
him fear to think Of this subject Sc
riously. He spoke OF his own drink
ing days. and OF his abstinence at his
wife's request after the birth Of his
son. Even on this trial he did not
dare TO permit, his feelings to assume
the possibility OF mental disease.
told him frankly that he made a mis-
take. that his wife was right. that his
boy was victim. the direct trans
mission OF his own drinking habits.
We shook hands and parted with q
cordially which was not apparent In
the next days examination. and yet
beneath the blum and stern exterior
I could see the real man struggling 10
put the question SO that my answers
would be the least favorable 10 his in
terest. The case was won. My testi
mony prevailed and the victim was
placed In an insane asylum, where he
died two years later No one knew
that our midnight interview saved
this prisoner from judicial murder.
A few years sfterward this lawyer
employed me as an expert In the de
tense OF a similar case. AZ the close
OF the trial went to his son. a poor
harmless. half-idiotic man. No ques
lions were asked. but l knew that he
had only recently been released and
brought home 10 die. The fathers
tenderness toward him sho Sed this
The crime had been oommittSf in an
other state and no one knew tn facts
OF the case
| A year later this lawyer was found
dead In his bed. and the boy was