Martinsburg herald. [volume] (Martinsburg, W. Va.) 1881-1920, 1911-09-30
CIRCUIT COURT ADJOURNED
TO THE FIRST OF OCTOBER
Joseph Muncey Case Dismissed az
Costs of the Plaintiff-other De-
crees in Chancery Cases.

cFees IN Chancery Cases.
At the session of Circuit Court on
Monday Judge Faulkner handed down
the following DEGREES:
Crime VS.. Kline, motion fer new
trial overruled and verdict against de-
PENDANT for 5000, stay of execution
for 80 days given to allow appeal of
If defendant so desires.
Old National Bank VS. H. II. En-
inert, A. Andrews and j. w. Thomas.
Judgment for s3,s1034 with interest
frczn date.
Joseph Mundey VS.. w E. Minghini
and r. T. Lemel, order sustaining
the demurrer to the evidence and dis
missing the case at the costs OF the
plaintiff
Cherry Run P. ". r. r. Co. VS..
G. A. Weaver ct al; order filling petit
ton and setting cause for hearing
w. B. Walters VS.. Martin Green
field, Richard A. Shipley VS.. Laura
Prechert, ct al, W. B. Lindsay, admir-.
etc, VS.. t. Flagg Eichelberger; Mar
EtlCA La SJuLlOA FS. Mdiy e. NtiilCI CT
al; DEGREES were entered confirming
reports of commissioners and making
distribution of the funds in their
hands
Joseph H. Shaffer vs. Kittie L. Roth
well ct al decree appointing commits
sioners to make partition OF the real
estate among the parties thereto en-
titled
J. William Miller vs.. Isaac Edwards
ct al; decree referring cause to con-
missioner to ascertain the real estate
owned by the defendant, the debts
aga nst the same and to report any
ether pertinent matters.
James H. Fulk, admir- VS.. unknown
heirs of Kate Glassford ct AL Decree
referring cause to commissioner to as
certain what real estate was owned
by Kate Glassford at her death. the
amount and value thereof to state and
settle the accounts OF the plaintiff as
her administrator and to ascertain
what are the debts against the estate
OF the said decedant
Court this afternoon took recess
until Monday, October 2.
Before adjourning Circuit Court
Tuesday afternoon over to Tuesday.
October 8, Judge Faulkner ordered the
following DEGREES in chancery to be
entered for record:
q. p. Beall exc'r. VS.. Decatur Os-
burn ct al; order confirming distribu-
tons made by executor and directing
lis report thereof to be recorded.
A. F. Payne w. Ernest C. Payne;
order docketing motion for the ap-
Pointme1t of committee for Ernest
C. Payne
c. G. Lemen VS.. Mary Bailey: order
overruling the plaintiffs exceptions
to the answer of the defendant,
C. w. Ambrose, administrator, VS..
Porter Mcdaniel ct al: decree confirm
ing report auditing the debts against
estates of the decedants involved in.
The suit and appointing special com.
missioner to make sale of the real
estate for the satisfaction OF the
debts.
~ ~. DnAiSy W. It IduC6S bdllSy,
decree confirming commissioners re-
port of sale and making distribution
of the purchase money arising from
the sale of the rel estate.
Margaret e. Sutton VS.. Mary e. Nil
Ter ct al; decree making partial dis
tribution of the funds in the hands of
the bonded special commissioner of
sale.
Joseph III. Shaffer, guards VS.. NJ.
Faith Shaffer ct al; decree authorizing
the guardian of the infants who own
the real estate involved to make sale
Of the same when he can do so with
advantage, and requiring bond to be
given before the receipt of any money
for the purchase.
Third Mountain Orchard Co. VS.. w.
d. Wilson ct al; decree suppressilg
certain depositions taken in the case,
, due notice thereof not having been
given and giving the plaintiff add.
tio1al time within which to take adj
djtlonal evidence in the case.
Ci~cuit Court was engaged for about
an hour on Tuesday in hearing the
preliminary steps i1Nthe matter of the
habeas corpus proceeding il the name
CT the State of West Virginia at the
relation Of Joseph Arnold against
Jawes r. Vo~hees. 1t will be remem-
bered that about two years ago Joseph
and Annie Arnold we're sentenced to
the penitentary for the alleged tarr-
ing and featherne # an old lady in
Back Creek Valley. Arnold was par
dOred after about, two months incar-
ceration hut Annie ARNOLD served cut
her sentence. Upon the return or the
latter a proceeding was brought
against Mr.. Vo rhees for the posses
sion of an infant child which was
abandoned when its parents were con-
fined in the peniteltiary. The child
in the time of its parents absence was
bound as an apprentice by the County
Court to Mr.. Voorhees,, and the Ar
fl0ldS now seek 30 have this proceed