davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-02-17
FRANK P. MULLEN.

1t is acknowledged by every one, who has fol
lowed the vast Improvements that have been made
in Seattle for the past six years that no in
the employee Of the city has served her more eff
ficiently, as well as effectively, than has Frank
P. Mullen, who has twice been elected to the
council, from at large. He is a civil engineer by
profession and construction contractor by trade,
both of which have given him most valuable fit
ness for the street work of the city to which he
assigned soon as he took his seat in the
council. No organization concentrated effort
in the city is now opposing his nomination and
election. There may be individuals in the city
who feel like seeing every member of the council
defeated, and that, too whether they know any
thing detrimental against them not. Such per-
sons will vote against Mullen but the number of
such persons is very limited He has been editor
tally endorsed by the Post-Intelligencer as one
of eighteen, and likewise by the Business Mems
League. You make no mistake to vote for Mullen.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-02-17

after the 10th day of February, 1911,
and defend the above entitled action in
the above entitled court and answer the
complaint of the plaintiff herein, and
serve a copy of your answer upon the
undersigned attorney for plaintiff at the
address below stated; and in case of
your failure so to do, Judgment will be
rendered against you according to the
demand of the complaint herein, which
court.
The object of this action is to dis
solve the bonds of matrimony now
existing between plaintiff and defend
ant upon the ground of the abandonment
and desertion of the said plaintiff by
the said defendant.
Attorney for Plaintiff.
Office and postoffice address:
Rooms 604-5 Mutual Life Bldg,
Seattle, King County, Washington.
Feb 1O-March "a, 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-02-17

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, STATE
of Washington, in and for the County
of King.
Franklin F. Gongleski, Plaintiff, VS.. Ida
N. Coon, Defendant. No. 77713. Sum
mons for Publication.
The State of washington, to the said
Eva GOngleski, Defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty 600 days after the date of
the first publication of this Summons,
to-wit: within sixty 600 days after the
18th day of February, 1911, and defend
the above entitled action in theabove
entitled court, and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff and serve a copy of
your answer upon the undersigned at
torney for Plaintiff, at his office below
stated; and in case of your failure so
to do, judgment will be rendered against
you according to the demands of the
complaint which has been filed with
the clerk of said court.
The object for which this action is
brought is to obtain a decree of divorce
from the Defendant upon the grounds
of Wilful desertion for more than one
year, gross neglect of duty and extreme
cruelty.
E r. SHIRRAN,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
P. o. Address: 1928 Epler-McDonald
Block, Seattle. Washington.
First publication February 18th, 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-02-17
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King Coun-
ty. Notice and Summons.
Aurora Land Company, corporation,
plaintiff, VS.. Unknown owners, and all
persons, if any, having or claiming an
interest in and to the hereinafter de-
scribed real property, defendants
State of Washington to the above de-
PENDANTS and each of them
You and each of you, as owners.
claimants or holders of an interest or
estate in and to the hereinafter de-
scribed real property, are hereby noti-
fed that the above named plaintiff is the
holder of one certain delinquent tax GER
tifcate issued by the treasurer of King
County, State of Washington, dated the
LIST day of June, 1909, and numbered as
follows, for the delinquent taxes of the
following year, in the following amount
and upon the real property situated in
said King County, described as follows,
to-wit:
Davis improved addition to the City
of Seattle, lot %, block l. certificate No.
B55361, year 1906, amount $076.
That the taxes for the following prior
and subsequent years have been paid by
the plaintiff upon said above described
real property, to-wit:
Lot %, block 1, Davis improved addi-
ton to the City of Seattle amount $1.24,
for year 1907.
Which several sums bear interest at
the rate of Is per cent per annum from
said date of payment, and are all the
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-02-17

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, OF THE
State of Washington, in and for King
County
Grote- Rankin Company, corporation,
Plaintiff, VS.. d. c. Brownell and +. w.
Winters doing business as Hotel Cor
lew, and Mrs. Gertrude Corlew and
John Doe Cor1ew her husband, whose
true Christian name is unknown, De-
PENDANTS. No. -. Summons by Pup-
iication.
The State of Washington. To the de-
PENDANTS, Mrs. Gertrude Corlew and
John Doe Corlew her husband, whose
true Christian name is unknown, De-
PENDANTS.
You and each of you are hereby sum
moned to appear within sixty (6O) days
after the date of the first publication of
this summons, to-wit: within sixty days
after the 23rd day of December, 1910,
and defend the above entitled action in
the above entitled court and answer the
complaint of the plaintiff and serve a
copy of your answer on the undersl gned
attorneys for the plaintiff at their office
below stated and in case of your failure
so to do judgment will be rendered
AGAINST you according to the demand of
the complaint which has been filed with
the clerk of said court. The object OF
this action is to recover the possession
of certain goods, wares and merchandise
sold by the plaintiff the defendants Cor
lew and wife under a conditional sale
contract on which there is a balance
due of $595.75, together with interest
at the legal rate from the 18th day OF
October, 1910, or the value OF said goods,
if same can not be returned, and that
the plaintiff has had issued out of this
cause and court writ of attachment
and has levied in certain property of the
in this county, to-wit Lot
Five (5), in Block Three CD of G. F:
stones Home Addition to the city of
Seattle. -
Attorneys for Plaintiff
314 Northern Bank & Trust Building,
Seattle, Washington.
Dec. 23, 1910-Feb. 8, 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-02-17
nv -THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, in and for the
County of King. go Day Summons
Ella Won Washer, plaintiff. VS.. j. ID:
Hendricks, sometimes known as ana
written John D. Hendricks, and Min
ME Hendricks, his wife; and Joe STAT
ton and Jane Doe Station, his wire,
and also all other persons or partles
unknown claiming any right, title, es-
tate, lien or interest in the real estate
described in the complaint herein, and
also any and all unknown heirs OF
the said defendants above named, de-
fendants.-No. 78O5S
The State of Washington, to the above
named defendants, ]. D. Hendricks
sometimes known as and written John
d. Hendricks, and Minnie HendrlcKs,
his wife; and Joe Station and Jane
Doe Station, his wife, and also al
other persons or parties UNKNOWN
claiming any right, title, estate, lien,
or interest in the real estate described
in the complaint herein, and also any
and all unknown heirs of the said de-
PENDANTS above named:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty 600 days after date of frst
publication of this summons, to-Wlt,
within sixty (60) days after the 18th
day of January, 1911, and defend the
above entitled action in the above en-
titled court and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff and serve a copy OF your
answer upon the undersigned attorneys
for the plaintiff at their ofhce peloW
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-02-17

stated and in case of your failure so to
do, judgment will be rendered against
you according to the demand of the
complaint which has been filed with the
clerk of said court.
This action is brought for the pur-
poses of quieting title in the plaintiff
to the following described property, to-
wit: A part of lot twenty-one (21) in
block two ca of the plat of Columbia
Heights, King County Washington, de-
scribed as follows: Beginning at a
point on the east line of said lot 81 a
distance of S3.47 feet south of the north
east corner thereof, running thence west
1858 feet, more or less, to the west
line of said lot 21; thence south along
the west line of said lot Fl a distance
of Al feet; thence east 1868 feet, more
or less, to the east line of said lot 81;
thence north along the east line of said
lot p a distance of Al feet to the place
of beginning
REVELLE, REVELLE & REVELLE
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Postoff1ce address:
605-608 New York Block,
Seattle, Washington.
Jan. 13-Feb. "a, 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-02-17

unpaid and unredeemed taexs upon and
against said real property.
You and each OF you (including said
persons unknown, il any, are hereby
further notified and summoned to be
and appear within sixty days after the
date OF first publication OF this notice,
exclusive OF the day of said first pub
l1catton, to-Wit, within 10 days after
December Both, 1910, in the above en-
titled court and action; and defend this
action ana answer the complaint OF said
plaintiff, and serve a copy of your ans
Wer on the undersigned attorney for
plaintiff at this office below stated or
pay the amount due, together with in
tereSt and costs. In case you fail SO
to do, judgment will be rendered herein
toreclosing the lien OF said taxes and
costs against each parcel of said real
property for the sums and amounts due
upon and charged against each, for said
taxes. interest and costs, ordering a sale
OF each parcel of said property for the
satisfaction OF the sums charged and
found against it respectively as provid-
ed by law, and as prayed for in plaintiffs
complaint, now on file in this cause and
court.
AURORA LAND COMPANY, A COR
PORAIlON, Plaintiff
F. j. CARVER,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
Dec. 80, l910-Feb. IA, 1911
Office address, Northern Bank & Trust
Co. Building.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-02-17

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
You and each of you Qncluding said
persons unknown, il any, are hereby
further notified and summoned to be and
appear within sixty days after the date
of first publication of this notice. ex
elusive of the day of said first publica.-
ton being December 23rd, 1910, in the
above entitled court and action; and de-
plant of said plaintiff and serve a copy
OF you ranswer on the undersigned at
with interest and costs. In case you fail
so to do, judgment will be rendered
herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes
and costs against each parcel of said
real property for the sums and amounts
torney for plaintiff at his office below
stated, or pay the amount due, together
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-02-17

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington for King Coun-
ty. Summons by Publication.
Herman Felt plaintiff, VS.. Elizabeth
Felt defendant.-No. -.
Tie State of Washington to the said
defendant Elizabeth Felt.
You are hereby summoned and re-
quired to appear within sixty days after
the date of the first publication of this
summons, to-wit, within sixty days
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-02-17
BUNKERS:

BUNKERS:
Rear James st. Power House,
Telephones: Sunset East 81
Independent 81
Twenty-Sixth Ave. and Dear
born st. Telephones: Sunset
East 102, Ind. 817O
Second Ave. No. and Boston
st. Telephones: Sunset Queen
Anne 1885 Ind. 1888
I'll Western Ave. between
Yesler and Columbia. Tele-
phones: Sunset Main 1878
Independent 289
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-02-17

Economy.-A New England
mother come upon her eight-year
old son enjoying feast whereof
the components were jam, butter,
and bread. :,
"son," said the mother, "don t
Won think it a bit eXtravagant to
cot butter with that fine jam?"
"No. ma am, was the response.
cts economical; the same piece
Of bread does for both. ''-Lippln-
colts.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-02-17
FRIDAY, February II, 1911

There is reasonable for voting against j. W.
Bullock for the nomination of city councilman, he has
made excellent public official during the twelve
months he has been in the council and if de-
served second term he does not much because it
customary reeect worthy public officials but because
he understands the workings of the city council and
render the city great deal better service than
1t may be all right to elect few members to the
council but it will be greatly to the detrment of the tax
payers to elect entirely council because there may
have been crooked work pulled off in the police de-
partment under the Gill administration Mr. Bullock has
shown conservatism granting saloon privileges and he has
been conservative in voting appropriations for improvements
and such dsere your earnest consideration when you
go to vote next Tuesday.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-02-17

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
state of Washington for the County
of King Summons
w R. Augustine, plaintiff, VS. Dora
Augustine defendant,-No. 1921:
The State of Washington, to said Dora
Augustine defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days from the date OF the
first publication of this summons, that
is to say, within sixty days from the
Goth day of January, 1911: and defend
the above entitled action in the aboVe
entitled court and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff and serve a copy OF your
answer upon the undersigned attorney
for the plaintiff at his office below
stated; and in case of your failure SO
to do, Judgment will be rendered against
YOU according to the demands of said
Complaint, which has heretofore been
filed with the clerk of said court.
The object of said action is to obtain
an absolute divorce from the BOND or
matrimony heretofore existing between
Yourself and the said plaintiff, said
divorce being asked upon the ground of
LEOPOLD M STERN,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
office and postofice address,
705 Lowman Building,
Seattle Washington.
Jan. 20-March 3, 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-02-17

A Compromise. = DONNIE =
"Why don't you two orotnerS
Join the church, ;.
One of the Two-"We can Z
both join, for one of us has to
weioh the coal. "-Newark Star.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-02-17
Our Ton ALWAYS wairb
1000 lbs.
RE N TON COAL

Insist on having the Genuine
you can easily detect a SUBJ
stitute. If such is delivered
send it back.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-02-17

In every part Of the city and every class of public
it is the of opinion that William H. Murphy.
who has been member Of the city council for the past
eleven years. has made most excellent municipal repre-
sentative To be Mr. Murphy has often voted different
from what you would have DONE but he would not have
been if he had not He has advocated those things,
the passage of which, has made the city grow like green
bay and there for him being opposed at
this time and it is verify believed that he will not be- but
will be overwhelmingly nominated next Tuesday.
Thomas p Revee father of the public market of Seat
tie will of get your vote because he of all merits
it, Mr. Revee has been tried and not found wanting
public official and should be nominated next Tuesday
The Seattle Daily Times has promised to E. L.
Blaine of Seattle because he laid bare the Gill admins
ration, which to mind will hardly meet the approval
of the 10000 voters who swpt Dillng into office.
Vote for Blaine for councilman
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-02-17

Different Candidate (haV-
ing quoted the words of an emil
nent statesman in support OF an
argument)- And, mind YOU
these are not my words. This IS
not merely my opinion. These are
words Of a man who knows what
he's talking about. london
Sketch.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-02-17

No Secret Mrs. Chucksley, is
your husband a member OF any
secret society?"
"He thinks he is-but he talks
in his sleep. Chicago Tribune.
The Expert Sure you re
thoroughly competent
ssWell. | ran over thirteen per-
sons in eleven months, and never
was caught. Life.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-02-17

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF c %MS
state of Washington, for k1ns Sou"
tTs summons by publication; o A.
Mary Murphy, plaintiff; VS.; 7k 1n9ni"S
THE state of Washington, to Thomas a.
You are hereby summoned 10 ap3 3efe
,yithin sixty 600 days after tine ua ,s
of the first publication of this sunlIn1UssttIb
d day Of December p 1910 and nd de e6rf
the above entitled action In tne Jo oint
aforesaid, and answer the col COUP, Of
Of the plaintiff and serve copy o.
U W ri' answer upon the undersigneed al at
forney for the plaintiff in case OF ba y ren-
feiii1re SO to do, judgment will pc r en-
dered against you according 10 i ne
nTaVer of plaintiffs complaint Wn aid
has been filed with the clerk OF salu
court. 1,,o on+i+lad ac-
tion is to obtain a decree OF apsoluCee
divorce from you on the GROUNDS OF
desertion and failure to support plain
tiff and for habitual drunkenness.
I'LL EDWARD w. FRANKLIN,
Attorney for Plaintiff
20 scheureman Building, Seattle
King County washington, o,,
Weekly journal-miner., 1911-05-24

a heavy sum to expedite development to depth, also seems warranted by what has been accomplished in so short a time. Indeed, the Pacific interests were never so encouraging as are in evidence at the present time.
 From recent development, a very large dump of milling ore is being accumulated, and it is probable that in a short time a concentrating plant will be in operation.
 John Kelly, president of the com pany, is expected to arrive from Kansas City early in June, to remain for several days to examine the workings, which are attracting con siderable favorable comment in that region, since depth is being reached.
Weekly journal-miner., 1911-05-24
RUSHING OPERATION
 ON PACIFIC COPPER
(From Wednesdays Daily.)

(From Wednesdays Daily.)
 With all machinery installed and working satisfactorily, active mine development is again under way at the works of the Pacific Copper Min ing company, on Silver Mountain, ae- cording to the report made yester- day by W. V. DeCamp, general man ager, who arrived in the city. The heavy equipment decided upon some months ago was due to carrying out not only large operations to reach depth but to begin a system of ex- ploitation warranted by what had been determined in previous opera tions in establishing attractive min eral conditions. The old vertical shaft was continued down, and is now completed to a point on the 475 foot level, where the vein was struck and where a large station is being cut to afford a base for di- recting future work. After this is finished the purpose is to go to the 600 foot level, which will remain for some time the permanent point from which to direct operations. Crafty ing results in ore determinations Mir. DeCamp says, have been made on the 475 level the grade being richer, and with a better defined Assure being f- fho- kn am this point there are now available two levels which with the sinking continued will afford a comprehen- sive system of mine work under flaw orable conditions. The intention is to increase the force when sinking is resumed and after the new station is cut on the AIS. Tn three months the 600 level will be reached, when development will have attained mark ed progress. Then will begin drift ing, erOsseutting and developing the big ore bodies that lie south of the main shaft, and from which ground the creation of a heavy producer seems assured. Mr DeCamp speaks enthusiastically of the general outlook at the works since the new machin- cry has been introduced. The gasO- line plant is working satisfactorily, and so far as the surface conditions are to be considered, that feature of the undertaking permits of but little The wisdom of outlaying
Weekly journal-miner., 1911-05-24
ROAD CHANGE PROJECTED.
GErom Fridays Daf1yl


 County Road Superintendent T. N. Childers returned yesterday from a trip of observation for a new cutoff under consideration on the Wieken- burg road to Phoenix. The country affected is in the Kirkland district One feasible route begins at the lower end of Copper Basin and the other starts at the tufa quarries both leading into the main travelled road to Peoples valley. Both lines will obviate passing through the sand washes of Kirkland creek and lessen the distance if the Copper Basin district is passed through. The build ing of the new road will be taken up by the board of supervisors in a few days and favorable action is an tieipated, So as to afford good trav- cling conditions for tourists from the southern part of the territory.
Weekly journal-miner., 1911-05-24

Let us hope the strong sense of hon. or of the American people, which has so often saved them from the dangers of demagoguery, will not be lacking in respect to this 'nostrum.
 "What I believe to be an unfound- ed fear of judicial tyranny and an unreasonable distrust of judges have led to- statutory limitations upon their power in the conduct of criminal trials which made trial by jury in this country and especially in the western states an entirely different institution from what was understood at the time of the adoption of our constitution. In many states judges are not permitted to comment upon the facts at all. They are not even allowed to charge a jury after argu- ments of counsel, but they are re quired to submit written charges upon abstruse questions of law with no opportunity to apply the princi- pies commercially to the facts of the case.
 'The restraint that the judge in the course of a trial imposes upon the manner and conduct of counsel in the English court is wholly want ing, with the result that there seems to have been a substantial chanoe in the code of professional ethics governing counsel and in the ex- tremes to which counsel in the de- fense of clients seem to think it entirely proper for them to go. Their conduct makes neither for the dig nity of the court, for the elevation of the ethics of the bar, for the expediting of criminal procedure, nor for the reasonable punishment of crime"
Weekly journal-miner., 1911-05-24

that this should be done, or that the court might amplify his original in structiOns.
 "I cannot do this without the con. sent of the defense replied the court. ''
 Attorney Ling for the defendant objected to this and would consent only to the court repeating its orig inal instructions given at the close of the case.
 Judge Doe replied that part of his instructions were from manuscript and the remainder oral, that he could not repeat the charge with exact ness as to the language but he would undertake to do so as closely as possible, if the defense were willing.
 MT. Ling promptly objected and the court immediately addressed the jury, saying:
 Gentlemen, you may return to your deliberations" They did so, and the verdict that was later reach ed, is understood to have been compromise between murder in the first degree and manslaughter.
 Rhode has been out on S20,O0O bonds, and his attorney after the verdict was read, endeavored to ob- tain the permission of the court for his client still to retain his liberty. Judge Doe emphatically refused the request and the convicted man was turned over to the custody of Sheriff Smith.
 Last night when the verdict was discussed on the streets, there was general disappointment expressed over the result, as the prevalent opin- ion had been that the verdict should have called for either capital pun ishment or life imprisonment, this sentiment probably being accentuated by the recent murders that have been committed in this county.
 The question being discussed last night as to the power of the court ! in cases of murder of the second de- gree prominent attorney said: "Un- der the statute, the court cannot fix bhe imprisonment at less than ten years, and he can make it fifty years or more, according to his iudg- nent in the natter