Albuquerque evening herald. [volume] (Albuquerque, New Mexico) 1911-1914, 1911-06-19
" g. cIIlLpERS


NNIRll''N lill '. y lih.fIi u
The act was PASSED ht 'hH lp3i-iH-
cure of 300. being chapter Do Of L..
1909. and thcrcupon thc answer, iu
tcrpo sod by myself W,r, amended $50
as 90 show compliance with lhc TORN.
OF thia aDr Drunrror .rc mite pos.
ed un behalf ct The forfltor, 10 these
an,Vors and were argucd 20, tho 90
tilrf attorney and itfurlo. General
CLANCY who coutDudcl thar iuc at
of Tho legislature was special lcsi-ln.
lion and void. This contention was
not sustained bN tho court and iHu
CONT oy,uulcd the dcWurrnHs Tine
three case, were lhcrcupun UroI.hi
.to .rial uuou an agreed station oft
facts. and % uial had upon SUCH facts
HriUIc judge AlhOti IN ali ,lTro o..
0u MAY 3lsl 1871; and b anp,lHu.
thai ih, questions presented sore '.
same as those d'rid Il ON 'n, d,Wu.
IuU Judgment Was rendered Dos luIsr
\h.pu Goa tine lOih day OF lun, l1ll
u ms favor dis uisslnp AN three
cases
ON Sopt,mb,r 2eih. 1905. gan ulv.
woni Wls returned by the grand u1.
.cu1I-tua u. With IN, crime 90 SCOUT.
Ton. munUf Ht rl., prrtcusDs. gI t-Iu.
1ul ut uN change against Cd. ..fu.
'ur yl-iIlu- schools. which wish. H.I.
actually performed hy doputiD ou.
plnN rd u' WH. u.mg thc sam, m.Ifrrf
involved boz On. so-callpd Stus,. -T'
oi August .lth 1904 the % r.
'oIr'd Geo auoNo \ domurC. uUt ni.i
tr .hs indictment which $50. -u'..u
ga nE fGr district court uuI .., boo
licrmruJ dismissed An appeal $50.
/ .utuu .N M clancy cu N..t ul Che
! i,miuH ruu inv decision I' Ui .u-
This indictment. aud ti. Iu.rWnuf vt
| thc district court WJs NJ W'i so ih"
| supreme caur' ON iuH.. 2"'N .HNi
| Nae cas-, Iriu. cpnr',i 200 f.. Sow
| NrNicu a page al'
ON October l"'h la1t. ut, ..h1
| indictments Nyc returned Oh.
grand Ur., cuGIsIus Ur tIJH ru.
bolzloucut uccdu., OF ut HuNu- pnd
on school Wuu,Ns Without .
claim nwt haNIu4 H0.u presented %
luD county cummissiru.. and In-
proved by them Demurrer VD.. Il.d
iu each ut these Indictments .u .dIl
urc 90 state crime and ou Aurl son.
lH", thet were all lisWiss,d uu .H.
application ui che disirir. uttuu,l
ON April l.h 1907 nyr other n.
li,'m'uts chagaiu- ny samo on,uses
m substance as those returned od Oc.
iuHer lyth. lHU6 and dismissed on
\pril ith 1905. We're returned agalnsi
me ON llo l2th ul April. 1907. a mo-
ton Tor "a change 81 venue I'm thHse
causes were filed by me ON the FIRST
az July, 1907 an order wac nude De-.
uvlng tho notion for "a chang, ot
venue. Dn the Gth day OF April. 1905.
an ordO. was md lo rlutinuIne these
| causes 10 tho n.Nt term uI the court
ON he end iat 0i October zoos. %
lcmurT,. to each ui ne C indictment
was hled and ON November ,3ra.
1905 the same were oECrulrI On
he 3Uth OF September 1903. ud tn"
FIRST day 90 The ,,rm OF court l. Ni'h
ny counsel WAS prcscut 100 court
and Insisted and demanded a trial ~
these causes ON tlO 33rl de-, pi so,
ycmher. 1909 I lilod motion that
these causes should be tried ai the
then Term of court and ou bccomuer
lath l9Ua. an order DENYING This mo.
ZION VAS made On me 3lsf day ol
December sos ! hlcd uutlou 30
dismiss me Indictments tpr failure
20 prosecute and trN thO same and on
lhD same laN an order was made
len iup 10, said motion 4 tNc Ian
'WrN 1910 term ol thc supreme court
ot thc territory, { applied io the su