Little Falls herald. [volume] (Little Falls, Morrison County, Minn.) 1889-1950, 1911-10-13

ID diours,ed- term, That sof- Frank Faust.
vs.. John Koch, Jr. ct al was con-
tinued.
The case of VIM. c.. Foster VS.. Lee
W. Cochran, ct al, an action over title
Of lano, was tried Tuesday and is to
be submitted on briefs.
Case Of Emma Bachmann vs..
Frederick W. ~Bachmann, ct al was
continued to adjourned term. That of
John Schmolke VS.. Catherine Stumpf,
as executrix Of will of John Stumpf, ct
at was continued.
The suit brought by the Town of
Little Falls against the City of Little
Falls to reco, er the amount claimed to
have been paid for it as it's share
towards the bonds and interest on
bonds issued for the construction of the
old Broadway bridge and interest on
that amount. was heard in district
court Tuesday. Transcript is to be
made and briefs filed. Cases of Town
of Little Falls VS.. the Towns of Pike
Greek and Agram which are similar to
that against the City Of Little Falls,
! were continued to the adjourned term.
Case Of Max. Mayer VS.. Albert G.
Murphy was tried Tuesday and is to
be submitted Oh briefs. Plaintiff sues
defendant for 500 damages for tres
passing on his property, claiming that
defendant had placed boats on the
shore of plaintiffs land on Fish Trap
lake, that in lourneying to and from
! the lake had trespassed on his property
and that defendant had used indecent
language towards him and threatened
him with bodily harm Defendant
denies all allegations and claims that
the road traversed was we'll defined
one, having been in use 20. years.
Early. in the fall plaintiff and de-
fendant came in contact and an in.
junction was served on defendant Aug.
20 enjoining him from trespasslng on
plaintiff s lana:
ant Reed in the case Of VIM. G. Foster
vs.. Myron Dederick, ct al and he will
be allowed to answer.
Plaintiff was granted judgment and
was adiudged owner in fee simple of
the northeast quarter of the northwest
quarter and the north half Of the
northeast quarter and lot l. section "a,
township 1872. range 80 west in the
case of Sarah E. Anderson VS.. Vim. G.
F.. Foster, and others.
The case of s. Trebby vs. Laura A.
Foster, E. F.. Shaw, ct al was con-
tinued to adjourned term. ~-
Briefs are to be submitted in the
case of Russell e. Scoles VS.. J. b.
C0nnell, which was tried Tuesday.
The case is an appeal from decision
given by Justice Pills. Randall as re-
fierce In the matter April II. 1911,. in
which judgment had been entered for
plaintiff and he declared owner in fee
simple to the property in question. It
seems that Russell e. Scholes had
given warranty deed to the property
to J. B. Connell and the latter had
given his promissory note for 81, COO to
insure the release Of the property to
defendant upon the payment of a bill
which defendant owed. Defendant
later refused to allow plaintiff to regain
possession of the property, claiming
that there was still $26O. 05 due him.
The collection of some rent, which it
|is claimed had been left to Mr.. Con-
nell, also enters in the case.
No action was taken in the personal
property tax cases Of state vs.. The
Minneapolis Threshing Machine com
pany and state VS. Mark Murphy Mill
ing Estate. s -. 81. sE #