Arizona republican., 1911-03-26
MANY CASES SETTLED
 IN THE SUPREME COURT
OTHER OPINIONS TO BE HANDED
 DOWN TOMORROW.
Recognition of Graham as County of
 Second Class.

Though the supreme court yester day did not conclude the work of the March meeting several opinions were handed down and opinions in other | cases will be announced tomorrow
 In the case of the territory against l Elias $ Kimball and Richard Shipp | who had been convicted in Graham | county of fraud in connection with | the sale of stock to Richard Layton | and others. in a Mexican plantation, | the judgment of the lower court was | reversed on the ground of insuffi- | ciency of evidence and the case was | remanded for a new trial
 In the matter of T. S Bunch, pro bate judge of Graham county against J. A. Wood, county school superin- tendent, an application for a writ of mandanus to compel the respondent to turn over to the applicant the books of his office and the office it. self on the ground that since the or ganizatiOn of Greenlee county, Ora ham is d county of the second class and not entitled to the luxury of a separate county superintendent, the writ was directed to issue. Justice Campbell dissented.
 In the case of w. $ TevIs and others. appellants. against Jep Ryan and others, apDellees from the county the judgment of the lower court was affirmed and the opinion of the su- preme court was reaffirmed, for, at the last meeting, the court modified and affirmed the judgment of the lower court fixing the amount of the appellees' judgment at $64, 4,564.63. But | the matter was left open, dependent upon the acceptance of the modifica- ton of the judgment, by the appel i lees At that time both parties 1 threatened to appeal to the supreme court of the United States. In the following cases the judg- ments were affirmed: Bell J. Barnes, administratrix of i the estate of Judge W. H. Barnes | against L. c. Shattuck and others | and Mary F. Street and j. l.. B. Al | exander, intervenors. The appeal was | against the intervenors for whom a ! judgment had been rendered in the | Cochise county court for attorneys ! fees due the firm of Street and Alex ander, in litigation, in which Shat | tuck was concerned and in which Judge Barnes was his principal at torney.
 other cases affirmed were: George 1 L. HamlintOn. appellant. against the l territory. respondent, Pima county. The Arizona Power company. ap- | pellant, against the Racine Saddlery company, appellee. Yavapai county.
 Etta l.. Sanford and others against Santiago Ainsa, administrator. Santa Cruz county.
 D. A William. appellant. against | the territory, respondent, Cochise county.
 II. C. Vincent. appellant. against | Allen Smith, appellee, Yavapai coun- ty.
 Santiago Ainsa. administrator of the estate of Frank Ely. against the New Mexico and Arizona railroad, ap- pellee, Pima county.
 The Arizona Power company. ap-
 pellant. against J. A. Kellam. appel
 lee, Yavapai county. The Becker Franz company. ap- pellant, against the Sierra de Orc Gold Mining and Milling company, appellee.
 The following were reversed: | George A. Olney. appellant, against
 H. w Bishop, appellee. Graham county
 George A. Olney. appellant. against
 J. T. Dowdy. appellee. Yavapai coun-
 ty.
 Frank Barrow, appellant. against
 the territory. respondent. Cochise
 county.
 A. F. Hurst. appellant. against T.
 N. Lakin. receiver of the First Ma
 tional Bank of Bisbee.