Evening times-Republican. [volume] (Marshalltown, Iowa) 1890-1923, 1911-10-06
APPEAL SET FOR TRIAL OVER
OBJECTION OF COUNTY
ATTORNEY DAILY.
SAYS CASE IS HIS, NOT
THE CITIZENS LAWYERS
Not Likely That Appeal Will Be
Reached, However, as it is Near tho
End Of the Assenment-Old Saloon
Cases and Drug Store Cases included
in the List.

! The case on the appea! of the sa
! loon petition Of consent. four old sa-
| loon cases and a number of suits
brought for injunctions against drug
sisrs. are included in the list Of forty
equity cases assigned Thursday by
Judge Nichols for trial next week IN
the district court. 1t is probable that
the petition case and the drug store
cases will not De reached. as they are
near the end Of the assignment.
Judge Nichols announced that he
/ would assign all of these cases, then
begin with the first one Tuesday and
try as many as could he completed
during the week The term ends Sat
urday.
Objects to Assigning Case.
When it was proposed 10 assign the
petition case. County Attorney A. G.
DAILY objected. because he said il would
b.. impossible for him to prepare for
The hearing 1t was intilnatod that the
attorneys representing the MarsnalI
County Citizens Association. j H.
ICcernlayer. J. L. Carney and {. H Van
Law. We're ready 70 try the case a any
time Mt. DAILY said that the case was
his as county attorney. and the law
yers named had nothing to do with 1t,
Attorneys representing the saloons and
the petition made no objection to the
assignment but neither did they insist
on the case being brought 70 trial
Other Liquor Cases Assigned.
Included in the list are four old sa-
loon cases. all brought in the name
of c. {. MlIhiser against Harry Nngel
Z E Boomer L. Bowman and +. w.
Rrewer. ct al. and eight drug store
cases which are more recent. and
which were also begun in the name
of G. c. Millhiser.
The following are the cases assigned:
B g Mcclure vs.. a c. Brenneck: G..
W Haddock vs. Mary Haddock: Hen
rv w. Eestal vs. Rose Nestal: A. w.
Harmon Us. Robert W. Stevens. coun-
" treasurer: Jacob Bolei. administra-
tor. VS. Martha E Gooch: H Witt vs..
z. ". Stevens. county treasurer: {. Z.
Millhiser VS.. Harry Nogel: c. q. Mill
lliser VS. Z. Z. Boomer; G. c. N!llhlser
IS. L. Bowman: Millhiser vs, f w.
Brewer: Eliza Gibbs vs. vi. c. How
ard: Cronk and Cronk VS.. McDermott;
A. L. Shorthll Company rs. E. W.
, Smith. Glenn e Jenkins vs.. Ellis +.
jenkins: James Skegg vs. Otto Rad
loft: Sarah Brandt VS. Daniel Sheet.
! John V. Noises vs. David kelbe: Abb
| bic p. Cook vs.. K. W. Stevens. treas
urere: John a Sieg vs.. A. A. Nichol-
son sheriff: Mary Werner We Edward
Werner: Ollie Lutte!;in vs. George l.
u. Good: E Z Newell VS.. ]. F Doane;
Martin Anderson vs.. Morris Gervich:
c. c. Millhiser VS. John Zundt; John
Kurtz vs.. Myra Holt; kurtz & She'd
vs. Myra Hoyt: Maggie Burke vs
Timothy Burke; in regard to the state
nent Of general consent to the selling
Of Intoxicating liquors: Vivian A.
Carlson VS.. Arthur a. Carlson; First
National Fank VS.. John a. Sieg: D
A. Rudy VS. J. E. Powers; Blanche
Weatherly vs.. A. y. Nicholson, sher-
if: Mary A Westman ys. Peter West
man: Philip Sheridan vs. city Of Mar
shalltowg: c. G. Millhiser VS.. W. c.
I3einert: c. G. Millhiser VS.. Joseph II
snyder; G. G. Millhiser vs. James E.
llalloy; G. c. Millhiser vs.. Fred Mad
Den: 9. c. NilIhser KS. LaPlant &
Son: C. c. Nilhiser vs. !. l.. Could; c.
G. Millhiser VS. A ". Gandrup.