Tonopah daily bonanza. [volume] (Tonopah, Nev.) 1906-1929, 1911-11-27

that the matrimonial relation accompanies
the matrimonial domcle therefore
jurisdiction Of the subject matter there matrimonial
and that be- unless parties be-
come residents OF tins state ana mere assume the duties and oo
matrmony The relation of husband and wife, therefore
such has been in Nevada, that is they
have not taken upon obligations respon
sby the marital relation in Nevada and the resthat is
matrmon have been Nevada and this the subject
matter of the libel in divorce for it is put an end these duties
and the for which that be DONE for instance de
the Of the court jurisdiction and unless there
has been a matrimonial domice this state
territorial jurisdiction destroy the Duties obligations and espon
siby marriage But it is claimed that
riag husband the residence of the wife, and
the of the husband coming to Nevada the law
would consrcivy make her resident also but such is not the
law as held in Churer Wilson Wall GU 81 1913 and in Had
dock Haddoc supra because as between husband and wife she
not tied to his residence only when their marital relation com
pee and perfect in its harmony and the duties and obligations
marriage being lawfully carried But such rule
what becomes of the DEGREES granted this state to the wife, who
long remained here certainly eight
these divorces obtained Nevada by coming the
the husband the residence of the wife, the wife could acquire
residence away from the husband and could be dOmcd
any purpose situated would
jurisdiction of any kind.
These Supreme Court of the United States
do not stand alone Mesurr Meurer c. 217
before the Privy Council of England at Page 52 Lord
Watson says jurisdiction of the is exercised
according the international law in the where
The parties domcie within its FORUM its decree dis
solving the marriage ought to be respected by the tribunals OF
very civilized country On the other hand decree of divorce
rived from rule of municipal law peculiar to it's FORUM can
when touches the interests of other country
authority
From this it will be that if and woman inter
spouses Nevada and get decree of divorce that
would have legal effect in England They would
still be husband and wife and could by any subsequent marriage
be prosecuted in England as guilty OF bgamy
In Rex vs. aey Russ n.y. S waS he no tra
nd in England void in England and no defense to an in
In Coies VS. Hector L. R. Eq 1874 1t held, that
divorce granted Turkey Turk snnung marriage settle
In Mccarthy Decaix Rues NJ GA Dane married an
English England and then removed with her to Den
there obtained divorce valid according to its laws
held be void in England and not to affect his rights
in her property.
: In in re Wilson'S Trust s. L. R. l Eq 247,
Shaw vs. Could L. R. 3, H. L. Cas- So.
was held that by COLLISION % n' ne Ts en
went to Scotland and married and had children during the
and the children Legitimate
The rule then established by these that the decree
territorial effect only as the caprice OF tou ~ ~ ;t 10y
permit it to stand upon the theory OF comfy out as 10 us s
raity as of the state of Nevada has no bind
ing force
cnde causes for divorce occurred in NevadaY Can
we assume legislature Of Nevada in passing our law
of Ds ep puer @ e Committed a not in Nevada but in New
York would be ground divorce Nevadai Take for
S Momsn ARE domieed in New York as wife
that the husband while New York 0S s seriously Say. beat tnt
at the Of wife though both Of them should come
So va sr S Tor r BY
civil court Nevada decree divorce tA same battery
n Holmes VS. Holmes A. Lmsng $685. plan6 obtained
divorce in Iowa on the ground Of cruel The Supreme
Court of held that the cruel treatment took place
New York. the subject matter res was outside the
jurisdiction Iowa court and that therefore, its decree wa
)t void.
Likewise every ground of divorce the law of Nevad
means and Of the legislature and such tn
law that the ground Of divorce mus
originate committed Nevada for cannot be presumed
that Nevada leglate could egate act
and conduct of persons outside territory When therefore
the of desron to continue year. means
Nevada New York elsewhere fall int
the anomalous position legae New York
certainly laws only relate to acts and deed
within territorial jurisdiction and grounds for d
voce True contract of
violated New York that such brought
of divorce could be rendered there and tn
brought the
he here could decree under laws because law
violated such the decree would have to