Tombstone epitaph., 1911-06-18
Doinss In the
 District Court

employees of the company who hsd assigned their claims to him, entered suit Tor debt for the sum of S2I ,526 10 due for services rendered the com psny in various capacities. The law firm of Pickett and Pickett r"pre- sented the plaintiff, while the in teresss of the company were looked after by Attorney Ben Goodrich.
 Judgments were alec entered against T. c. NJ. Co.,, in favor Of the Territory for taxes; Steinieldt X Co.,, FN wolcott and the Mschomich Mercantile company for materials. The total amount of the judgments runs over s40,000.
 TUESDAY
 The district court convened st the usual hour this morning end follow ing matters were disposed oi through. out todsy's session:
 Iu the case of Solom on- Wicker sham ys T Quillism, an action for debt, which was tried before s jury yesterday afternoon, the jury return ed verdict into open court in favor Of the defendant in the sum of S250. A motion for 6 new trial was argued by the attorney for plaintiff which was granted hy the court and the verdict of the jury was se: ss ide.
 The divorce case Of James K Lapsley vs Mary lspsley, was order- ed dismissed from :he calendar on motion of the plsi ntitf.
 The case of Asa Walker and John H Walker vs " W Adams. injunction proceedings, vss set for trial on June 2lst.
 The case oi Charles NJ Renaud vs the Gold Queen Mining company was set for trial on June 27. This is SD action for debt.
 The case Of Frank 5 Moson vs James Kelly, to quiet title, wac or. dered dismissed on motion of the plaintiff.
 h the case of the city of Bisbee vs J H Jacks ct al. an action for debt, . demurrer wss presented to the com- plaint which wss overruled by the court,
 The case of A I McAllister vs c L Witts, an action debtr was on trial al the noon hour and motion to strike and demurrer were both presented and argued and upon both being granted by the cour: the plaintiff wss given ten days 'n .which to file sn amended complaint, and the case wss get for trial on June 30.
 Decrees of divorce were granted in the following named sctions:-
 Charles Polti vs Mary 2olti. plsiu- tiff resident O. Bisbee.
 Michael Bello vs Elizabeth Bello, plaintiff resident Of Bisbee.
 Stsinslaw Grizmsls vs Anisla Griz- msls, plaintiff residen. oi Bisbee.
 A change of venue sss granted in the case of the W E Harrison com pany vs Oscsr Johnson. an action for the recovery of property, to the First Judicial District st Tucson, and upon motion of the defendant the cost ben was fixed by the court at $lOO.
 The case of the Territory vs Martin O'Hsre, an appeal from the justice of the peaos court, ws: continued !c, the term op motion Of the defendant.
 In the case of the Territory of Ari. zona, ct the relation and to the use of Charles " Hicke, taI collector. vs the Tombstone Consolidated Mines company, sn action to collect back taxes, @ motion was made by the plaintiff that all parties, both plain tiff and defendant in the case of T. R. Brandt Ys the Tombstone Consolidst- ed Mines company. be made parties defendant in this action for the pur- pose of establishing priorities. All parties being present in court at the time said motion was offered the mo- tion vse confessed by the respective couneel in the case and the ssue uss 30 ordered by tine court
 wEDSEsDAY
 The usual grind was resumed in the district court this morning when the case of William kynerson vs the First National Bank of Douglas, sn action to recover damages, wac called for trial. This being . case wherein . jury had been requested, the following yeniremen were empanelled to try the issue.
 William Hughes c 4 Fisk A Wentworth NJ Riley W H Seayer George D Eby William Cogbett T W Mcguire Floyd Smith J A Stone Harry Eckermsn Jsmes B Riley.
 The case of W 0 Page vs the Ari. aona & Cleveland Mining company, for debt. was ordered dismissed from