Tombstone epitaph., 1911-12-24
Doings in the
 District Court
MONDAY


 he last time that e Federsl grand ury will sit in this city. as under ,tatehood the Federal court will sit at Phoenix.
 The plan to have bat one Federal court in Arizona, after statehood has been arranged, but the plan to have that court at Phoenix, however is not with approval of citizens d Arirons and an effort will be made l. have the Federal courts remain as they | are ct present. sn enactment of law being required, which will be secured II possible. Panel called of grand jury and inry and four reported present and special venire of IT issued returnstle at Il a. m.
 us GRAND JURY
 The following is the panel of the grsLd iury:-
 W A Parker JT Perkins Ben c Schwenk Val Vslenzuela B Best John Rock c A Fisk Harry Rsfferty Wm Railing d M Eckermsn E Nj Hswes F. H Reeves \ J Riley LF Winters JP Mcdonald Milton Fsirlee PB Wsrpekros Sam Johnson Wm Lutley Allen Thompson John Rock wss appointed and sworn in e chairman of the grand jury.
 Miguel Guatemala was sworn in as Spanish interpreter for the grand jury.
 | Matthew Telin wac sworn in ss grand jury bsiliff.
 An order was entered on the motion oiU s District Attorney Morrison upon request of Attorney Genera Wickershsm that hereafter, all male federal term prisoners convicted shsl be taken for imprison ment at the federal penitentiary at Atlanta Geor- gis, and sii iemsle prisoners to Ian sing, Kansas, federal prison.
 The cas.es Of Boggis vs Pidgeon Roemer vs Ariz Mich Dev Co, Bsni ot Benson vs Ariz Mich Dev Go ct al Lindley vs Parrott all reset for Jar llth 1912. On motion of the U ! district st- torney all cases against L c Hanks o Douglas charged with false entries ir bank statements were dismissed si were csses against Albert Capt snC Wm Klutipg charged with smuggling
 Superior and Pirtsburg vs McBrid, was dismissed. 1 In case of Franklin vs Hor~itz motiuu wss presented and argued tt qussh the execution. Denied by tn, court.
 Court opened st 9:30 this mornint and the following business was psssec upon:-
 h the case of Bowman vs Wsrne. kros . motion was argued and denied by court, whereupon the case was sei down for trial for Jan l9. 1912.
 Adams vs Clues; motion made fol judgment on the ple.dings. Wit cesses were heard. Judgment. ien.e.- ed for plaintiff. | U. 8. grand jury rendered . partial report finding several secret indiet- ments.
 | Superior and Pittsburg vs Mat slsnts. Judgment for plaintiff
 Superior and Pittsburg vsJ V Frank Judgment for plaintiff.
 Superior and Pittsburg vs F J ard Emma Schmidt Judgment for plaintiff.
 Superior and P;::sburg vs Lee Perry Judgment for plaintiff.
 Superior and Pit:sbuIS vs s and Martha Grenon. Judgment for plsin- | tid.
 Superior and P,ttsburg vs Mcbride, dismissed. Wager vs Wager. divorce decree for plaintiff. Brisbane vs Brisbane. divorce decree granted to plaintiff Pittsburg Copper Go vs Jacob Per- ung. Judgmeo plaintiff.
 Slisb vs Sligb, decree of divorce granted plaintiff.
 Order for territorial trial jury en- tered. setsing date for Jan 3.
 steinfsld vs Marks. judgment for plaintiff
 U 8 naturalization papers were granted to Antonion Verdueo. Another partial report of the grand jury vas filed. but not made public. The U 8 cases against Leon and figuero were dismissed and defend arts di charged.
 Continued on Page (