Mineral Point tribune. (Mineral Point, Wis.) 1869-1938, 1911-06-15
NOTICE or EXECUTION SALE.


Whereas judgments have been docketed in
the Circuit Court in and for Iowa county, Wis
consin, as follows;
"a A judgment in favor of Ernest &. Fled.
Ter and Joseph }. Fielder. cO-partners doing
business under the firm name and style OF
Fielder * Fielder. plaintiffs, versus Joseph
Roger, defendant. Docketed on the 18th day
of January 1905 for $1,000 damages and s4.95
costs.
% A Judgment in favor of Nicholas Ire
week, plaintiff, versus Joseph Roger, defend
ant. Docketed on the goth day of January.
1908, for SSO2l damages and 1886 costs.
(3) A Judgment in favor of Gundry & Gray
Company, corporation. plaintiff. versus
Joseph Roger, defendant. Docketed on the
Goth day of January. 1903, for Sl645 damages
and 81. 40 costs.
"a A judgment in favor of Il. j. Penhalle-
gon, plaintiff versus Joseph Roger, defend
ant. Docketed on the 20tn day OF January,
1908, for So. IS damages and SS 70 costs.
90 A Judgment in favor of FrankJ Martin
and Jennie Martini administrators Of the es-
tate of N r. Martin, deceased. plaintiffs, YER
Sus Joseph Roger. defendant. Docketed on
the 10Th day OF January. 1905, for s6i6l dam
ages and 50 rs costs.
(eI A judgment in favor of John F. Hendra.
plaintitf, versus Joseph keger. defendant.
Docketed on the 9th day OF January. 1905, for
s3770 damages and S7y5 costs.
Cd A judgment in favor of Toay Grocery
Company, corporation created and existing
sin, plaintiff versus Joseph Roger, defendant.
Doeketed on the 18th day of February. 1908.
for S53 so damages and S7.95 costs.
80 A Judgment in favor of v m. } Jeuck.
tieorge Jeuck, Jr., and Frank Jeuck. co-part-
ners doing business in the firm name and
style Of VIM. !. Jeuek \ Bros. plaintiffs. yer
sus Joseph Roger, defendant. DOcketed on
the 10th day of February, 1905 for s52.34 dam
ages and S6.i5 costs.
t9) A judgment in favor of w. II COrreil
and X. ). Martin. cO-Dartners. doing business
under the firm name aud style Of Correll 4
Martill-e plaintiffs. versus Joseph Roger. de-
| PENDANT Docketed on the 29th day OF Janu-
ary, 1913, for sS72 damages aud S7.l5 costs.
| l0) A judgment in favor of \. IL. Linden
and Fred Branger. co-partners doing business
under the firm name aud style OF Linden Il
| Branger, plaintiffs. versus Joseph Roger. de-
| PENDANT Docketed on the Bird day OF May
1903, for SA.35 damages and $50 costs.
| ~ A Judgment in favor of A. L Bishop,
plaintiff. versus Joseph Reger,, defendant.
Docketed ON the 10th day OF March, 1910. for
Sl5.25 damages and $3.50 costs.
Now. THEREFoRE. pursuant TO and by virtue
OF executions issued on all OF the foregoing
judgments ont of the Circuit Court of Iowa
county. Wisconsin, to satisfy said judgments,
!, the undersigned, sheriff of Iowa county.
Wisconsin. will. on Monday. the 3lst day
7 of July, A. ID. 1911. at O'Clock in the after
noon OF said day. AT the front door of the city
hall in the city of Mineral Point, Iowa
County, Wisconsin, expose for sale to the
highest and best bidder or bidders. for cash,
all the right title and interest of the defendant
1.-THE same being an undivided one-tenth) IN
and TO the following described real estate, sit
uated in the county of Iowa and state OF Wis
consin TO satisfy the foregoing judgments,
costs and interest on said judgments and
costs of sale t0-wit; The southwest quarter
of the northeast quarter; the northwest quar-.
ter of the northeast quarter; the north half OF
the northwest quarter of the southeast quar-
ter: the southeast quarter OF the northwest
quarter; all in section number thtrty-three,
township number five north. range number
two east, and the east half of the southeast
quarter of section number thirty-tWo town
ship five north. range two east; and the north
west quarter of the northeast quarter OF sec
ton number four. township four north, range
two east The whole of said real estate Is
subject to a life estate therein in favor of
Catherine Roger and subject further 10 liens
as follows:
Ss3000 in favor of Nicholas Roger
$4,000 in favor of Anna Holloway. n u
Si0lOO in favor OF William Roger. y
$500 90 in favor of Mary Boggs. ~
S5O0OO in favor of Catherine Roger.
$4,000 in favor OF Albert Roger.
$4,000 in favor Of Emma Roger
Dated Sheriffs office. June s. 1911.
W. r. PENGELLY. Sheriff.
Fielder d Fielder. attorneys for plaintiffs IN
judgments Nos. 1. g. rs. 3 10 and Il.
Joseph n. Treweek. attorney for plaintiffs in
judgments Nos. ?. 3. and ). a2lw6