Norwich bulletin., 1911-04-28

4N4Gm4 Lower Pricoo 1& H4fgW~P Produet9
 s.s.1t is aid that this IT III axreemeni N that afk6n4s agricultural pf0dncts unor(
 tnqn mufacturess E44t II true; btal prpdssctS 6stween tho 9yEs eountt1es o1 I afly 6uEiSfEntial a11o11& V k& chief part | of fk mutt necessarily && Iii aGricult ItMro1 6&6f1ncts.t As II zg 1 V G1poft tp | E&a S{ more agricu1e2&& &roldcfa
 tlz& Sve receive frc@ As M sQzt l 6o11 n my judSzn3nt III the ! Rp4ei &c pricep of agzfeNl& lucts \ n ouF country. It n GQf4E to kea1y t4h1I1- IL 1s noinG to HenuEe el t&Esd l ancknaktons and it is g01ne ID 6zl1ce 44 i4tefrhenge of preduczs II U pxo1It Nt5n Enlarge Farmsrss Eisid
 If objection can be made U the ctass derived leaD benaf1t fHomTft tlan othsr classes, then it ts tho 1nknuknc- turet 0k the country who o1x<<E II FG1S- 1ech becauze the treaty t0 m n4fc1Fa will not erllarGe his n1ar1e< - much as it will th4t of the farmer Fannsrs Misisd by cireGlnrs.
 1T am quite aware that from ono
 motive or another q great dea1 ok d.
 fort and money have been 6panf III
 vincs them that this Canad1&n tr1a&ys if a6prtod, will do them injury f30s
 net know that 1t is possib1e to a11xy|
 such 1eaxg by argument, pending th6
 co1sidefatt6n Of the treAty 6E tho
 senAt& But there is one W&y md
 ing the fallscy and unfounded c13a1Sc-
 ter of tl1s1f fears to the fexne&1. or any other sc161o that believes fk613f tol be. unjustay Affected by this fre&t m that te fos try It on. ss <. v s.s 4 4s9s
 can oo 5piscontiniied # Injusjo.iS, E x ..'There fs no obligation on either nation to continue the reciprocity drr rangement any longer than 1t desires, An1 II jt te found by actual practiee| that th1E6 n m fndury. and - p@41a1- nent if5nry, to the &&rmers of fhte c0untfE every6odT knows that t11ey c1& LII ede13lr f41frpls iegislatiOn .t0 M r1.l.1s & md . return n
 k8Al s1 ss'sspSl sn tts lasrits.
 < s1 a1p3GT stnL ssI ils sSHas1ns ssssaas ssz 92s: ths IT. ss d LIZ nss1s rissr to {he 's puSlie sS a tSs tSst \ tbi contract ought ~ atand IT mn by ifS own &effpA ana that tts baaSaxe IF fIs- feAt 0ught nQtftO be Affected fn anv re9ard by oth$f amendments to the tArtn Inv: Such . msehDd' is recur- renee to tlne ola way of making tar lm bill, which has been properly crit iciSed and condemned. by which its pasaage IT s9cpxed. not on the merits I of particular 6chs0u1eS, but by the guppogf that mny bs secured in fhe house or e&nate throuEh giving ' tar- 'n en particulAr products of particular
 Sentiment fsr nevisien.
 think ti3Sr2 is general senti- nent nov in 6Ayor Of the revision of | the tarl4 schsdule by schedule. and oI nlekin t1i9 revision the pendant l !y.L ~ exace m1esa 4tion n to each sched- ] lors. To ann fhis csnadirn ss ahsn con- tract anG to M4he its pessaee tic pen- l aent oA etAet &a<iM leG1elstion is to 1 continue tMe 6M mefAo6 o1 oAriff reyfs- | lon characteS43td, net without ro1aon. l IT local 1o1t14. oppsrtunitt AaS5 Nsvsr Gems Ao.sn.
 T have na5a that tl1e was. ' criti- !! gal time stu t34 solution of the oues- l tion of reGaproeity. It is critical be- | caz unIe94 it Ia nov decided fa- | vorepty to rscipFocitY it is exceedingly | eyers aeafnz ze641e to tho Un1ted States. 1 The forcen NAt&h aro 1t Work in Enr- l And and III Gnnada to 6an1rafa her 2y \ Chlntle wall from fke United | States ma tQs mako her p1rt of an | !nPerial coM4aefe311 banA reaching | ly0m nginn4 around tho world to | sntital fafi61 win deriye an imnefr. lr, sa-f from the re54ction of this treaty: and l !1 we Woflld nave reciprocity with Eli l Lhe advAntaEAS thaf have deacrihe3 | and that earnestly and eincerely he- | !1eve VIII .4QIkoW In adoption, we must | axe Y now IT rive 1t ID forever.