The Washington herald., 1911-02-01
Circuit Court No. 4.
JUSTICE ANDERSON.

No. lssl3 Cohen VS.. United States Express Com
pany; motion for trial. Attorneys. ]. j. Bros
nan and Leon Tobriner-A. A. BIney.
No. 52S9e. Mciarvey VS.. Capital Traction Coin
pany; certified tn Circuit Court No. for trial.
Attorney L. H. David and A. L. Newmyer-R- X.
Perry & Son and G. T. Dunlop.
No. 1916. kan New York Continental Jewel
Filtration Company; 1rter allowing Maddox Cat
ley to withdraw their appearance as attorneys for
plaintiff. Attorneys. J. A. Maedel-Mckenney 4
Flannery.
No. isIss Pritchard vs. Baltimore and Ohio Rail-
rad Company: Oh trial. Attorneys ID. W. ODono-
ghme-Hamilton. Colbert Yerkes Hamilton
No. 5l3S6. Mcnamara Washington Terminal
Company; bill Of exceptions signed and filed. At
tprneys. Leckie, Fulton Cox-Hamilton. Colbert,
Yerkcs & Hamilton.
Assignments for February 2:
No. 90. Taylor Commission Company Moses.
Attorneys. Burkhart-Davis.
No. 49, sayers vs. Southern Railway Company.
Attorneys. Decentralization. Colbert. Yerkes
Hamilton.
No. o. Turner vs. Nocnan. Attorneys. Gies.
Peter.
No Is shipley vs. Safrank. Attorneys. Mackey.
Lirscomb & Ryan-Gassie.
No. Iel. Shellho-n. r.. Capital Traction Com
pany. Attorneys. Downing. McNalley & Forrest
Perry & Son and Dunlop.
Circuit Court No. 2.
JUSTICE BARNARD
No. 5Gsl. Merillat. administrator. vs.. Chesapeake
Beach Railway Company; on trial. Attorneys. c.
Fl. Merillat and VI. y. Richardson-Mckenney 4
FTannery.
No. 5l656 Lane vs. Washington Railway and
Electric Company: verdict for plaintiff for $50 and
judgment forthwith. Attorneys. W. L. Ambrose and
c. 5. Hillyer-c. A. Douglas
No Ell. Edmonds Anacnsta and Potomac
River Railway Company; leave granted to file amend
ed declaration. Attorneys, l.. PutzfelderJ. ]. Oar
lngton
No. $3.50. Salzman ". Cameron: H. winshiI
Wheatley allowed to withdraw appearance. Attor
ney. II. W. Wheatley.
No. 52N6. Chaloner vs.. Washington Post Com
pany: Judgment mandate. &c. Attoneys. John
Ridout-W. J. Lambert.
No. 50lso Jaselr vs. Rigs National Bank: same
Attorneys II. ". wheatley-R. X. Perry & Co.
No. 1880. Same VS.. same: same. Attorneys. same
No. 5ls6l. Brcz. administrative. vs.. Chesapeake
Beach Railway Company: time TO file transcript ex-
tended. Attorneys. l.. Tobriner and A. l.. New
myer-McKinney 4 Flanncry
Assignments for tomorrow
No. 0s. ApplegA-th vs. Southern Railway Com-
pany. Attorneys Carter & Brooke-Hamitor-
No. 22i Jasscli Glover Attorneys. Wheatley
Perry K Son-
No. ao6 Thornton - North Chesapeake Land
tasue & Moriari;y and Newmya-Hamiltou. Colbert
Yerkes Hamilton.
No. rs. Crook - White ct al. executors. Attor-
neys. Lambert & Yea;man-Colbert-
neys. Hamilton. Colbert. Yerkes 4 Hamilton-Me-
Keuney & Flanncry Crai:hill.
No. "a. Edmonls Anacostia and Potomac
River Railway Company. Attorneys. Rretnelder-
No 80. Shinn " Evans ct al. Attorneys. Shinn.
Pennebakef. CarIsi & Jones-Arth.
No. J6. Hudson Pickford. Attorneys. Lips
comb Ellison Il Mitchell-Maddox 4 Galley.
No 3s. Jaselli Vs. Simmons. Attorneys, Wheat
ley-Birney.
No. 3l0 Fox Co. vs. Lewis ct al. Attorneys. Mar
shall-RhodeS.
No. 81 WeidensaII Vs. Capital Traction Com
pany. Attorneys. David-Pery & Son and Dunlop.
No. SIG. Heinze vs.. Washington Railway and E'ec-
tic Company. Attorneys. Dutton L. Maddox-Dar-
lington.
No as Lyon vs.. Stewart. Attorneys. Ridout-
Brney < Woodard. =