Bismarck daily tribune. [volume] (Bismarck, Dakota [N.D.]) 1881-1916, 1911-04-15


some Senator's tmed something that might
some of you your this and want to refer to 0at
connection my opening statement to what our evidence IN TINS case
1 gentlemen OF the jury against
being governed any of the evidence given tins ce ana
refer to report that know mas Dee eu
AMONG Senators here has been circulated among Senators
he that should have bearing 1t been nmated here
to who have referred the matter IN speaking
me themselves that some follow consequence OF my
acota at your be taken and forth upon
people instrumental bringing about the proceedings h
we are now engaged gentlemen this Senate
that while am best of the best OF
nature much for that respect ana say " 20.
today open that the have rolled over me nave ~
that nv life too today that life too Short Tor
of taking men that have done me wrong say
to Won this day that ought to feel our hearts
the spirit of forgiveness Senator's
forced mh the spirit OF revenge even upon the
men done much wrong not IN me- and wnen go
hack to nv home whether Second Judicial District
only as State of North Dakota go with the fene
in my life enough left to spend any portion OF IN
taking revenge upon that have fit to engage
against me- do dgree say to you gentle
men of Senate these and these women that have
spent so back trying to raduce by character
Of this the men and women who nave spotted
and spd upon my private life that they might bring and my family
nv innocent wey wfe-bng boys and innocent
girls degradation at their hands say to them
George Bangs Just moment Will evidence be introduced IN
support of this and relevant to the issue before
this Senate going outside of opening statement
and making argument because yesterday we permitted him all
d ong to rambe from the strict opening Now
don't imposed upon this matter but will leave it to
Judge Cowan himself Was that an opening statement!
Mr. Yes, sir, have heard you make far worse ones
Mr. George A. Bangs shall Withdraw objection Continued
Mr. heard make far worse ones say to these
VENICE either mys wife, and these men and
women that heap financial trouble u.s. heap
disgrace and ~ and bring so much
Of sadness and sorrow into ome them from the bot
tom my heart be that this holy morning from
nv Christian prayers offered the altar OF her
her God for forgiveness well safety and success and
leave this question with her, and with fellows
Now then gentlemen of this jury return the question we were on
last npht when we the discussion of the
evidence delayed And this connection let
me saw to you gentlemen Will charged here with having delayed
cases that there single CHARGE either the
papers themselves the evidence support OF these allegations
that have corrupt doing that say that am proud OF that
that no period history as Judge with
having anything corrup for personal gain or for advantage to
this or to that night specification 49, That is the
case of Threshng Machine Co., MARI Now say you frankly
gentlemen that familiar with that Of the
attorneys but my there motion made for
new trial. after had been against the defendant The
verdict was given recollection is $l13 motion
for new trial was motion argued twice. that is
wasn't argued perhaps argued onetme know thaand
know that no decision urged by either of the pares
brought to attention by the attorneys
under consideration for settlement and that the 'et
dict while given plaintiff wasn't desired be force
could be had, because there was grave doubt IN that case as
whether could get at and determine the law tnat gong 10
the supreme COURT involved Of something think
like $s make desirable to to the supreme court
and that case was left the the
case and that settled and argued before
me had mind made by rulings in that case at
the ev ruling lead the directed verdict IN the
case or that up verdict that They bore the
question issue after the verdict Obtained and had no
reason whatever change what the law far as
could see it, and other side differed with
and grounds difference of opinion what the law wa
vet stood taken and opinion formed at the time
that case was remained and that
and they had come and asked Tor
would have been just exactly line
file of that am also refreshed in memory
nv counsel in calling of Mr. Anderson in this
said corroboration of that at the time that
the motion for argued discussed before announced
that position had held in reference to the testimony
and support verdict the time OF the trial. and that
That delayed for some time at
the he might still
look 10 some couldn't find OF inducing
what the law of that really and after
that to bring on before me TOT
decision, and order presented to me Until was us
posed of by settlement of these parties
The next specification Charles H. Burke set forth in the
Charles H. Buan against Adam Scharf That has oeen
stricken need of making reference to IT,
Devils Lake Brick and Stone Co., against
the Co. That gentlemen was tired ABOUT
the forth That the world was SUD-
been befed before me- 1t was
that involved large amount
of claims kind another incurred by woren and incurred tor
the building of mill the city OF