The Hope pioneer. [volume] (Hope, N.D.) 1882-1964, 1911-08-17
DENY HARVESTER TRUST.
So-caIIed Townsend Report Declared
Erroneous.

Erroneous.
Washington, Ang. 14.-That the ar
guments and conclusions of the So
called Townsend report are based
lpOn clearly erroneous statements of
we'll known facts is the opening asser-
ton in a reply by Edgar Bancroft,
counsel for the international Harves-
ter company. filed with the house
steel trust" Investigating committee
In answer to charges made by Burd-
cite D.. Townsend. special agent for
the department of Justice in 1908.
The Townsend report was filed with
the committee a short time ago.
Nearly every important statement
of fact relating to the purpose of the
investigation" the reply continues, "is
either grossly inaccurate or entirely
untrue. The general inaccuracy of the
report is shown by it's misstatement
even in the names Of the president and
chairman of the board of the Interna-
tional Harvester company and of the
voting trustees = although they we're
all widely known and a matter of pub
lie record for four years prior to the
making of the report. /.
THE fundamental charge of a COM
bination to create a monopoly is based
by the report on the charge that the
knotter in the self-binder is protected
by patents and that the International
owns the patents on all the best types
of knotters.
No knotter Patent.
StTho {r,Ih So ALoA yla,. .
ent whatever On the essential part Of
any type of knotter and there has not
been any such patent in force since
1890. when the Appleby patent ex-
pired. This fact not only appears on
the records of the patent office but
is known to every manufacturer of
self-binders and to every principal
dealer in them. Neither are there any
existing patents on any essential part
Of the grain binding machine. The
many basic patents had all expired in
1896: and there have been no sub.
stantial patented improvements since
10000 years ago-while the life of
a patent, as is well known. is only II
years."
The statement of the Townsend re-
port. that of the nine different types
of grain binders purchased by the In
ternational Harvester all but three
have been abandoned and that repairs
are not furnished for any others is
branded by Attorney Bancroft as mo
toriously and absolutely false"
He further says that repairs for
every type then lat the time of the
report) were and have ever since been
furnished by the International when
and wherever called for"
No Binder Irvine Trust.
"The reports charging a binder
Irvine trust are without any founda-
ton whatsoever" declares the reply.
which also states that the Information
al has had the vigorous competition
of n large and SIX smaller Irvine
manufacturers in addition to seven
state pe%nitentiary Irvine mills.
In reply to the charge that COMPETE
ton had been largely suppressed
Mr.. Bancroft cites the names of eight
firms which he declares are all active
competitors.
AS to the charge that the Interna-
tional receives rebates from railroads
and special concessions from the
United States Steel corporation, the
reply declares that the harvester com.
pany's relation to the United States
Steel corporation is not different from
it's relations with the competitors of
the steel corporations" and that dur
ing the past eve years it has bought
from the steel corporation 40 per
cent of it's total needs, while it has
purchased 30 per cent from competi-
tors of the United States Steel, the
balance Of it's needs having been sup
piled by the International subsidiary
corporation, the Wisconsin Steel Com
pany."-
AS to the charge Of increasing prices
the International asserts that, instead
of increasing them, it's influence has
been to prevent increase. that the self
binder, sells at a very low price-rela-
lively lower than that of any other
farm implement or machines. that the
selling prices are freely fixed by the
dealers and that the terms of credit,
JERSEY CONGRESSMAN PASSES.