The Coalville times. [volume] (Coalville, Utah) 1894-1923, 1911-01-20

Distortion No. I stated that We have
been accustomed ~ advertise Grape Nuts
and Postum a. cure ais for cNcD thing.
Company a. advertise Grape Nuts ur Pos
tum TO cuLe anything.
We nv that IN cases where coffee din.
grccs and h causing sickness ~ dismissal
will remove the cause II the trouble. aud
We suggest the use Of Postum fr tho
reason that Il furnishes hot p,labhir
morning beverage. and contains natural
elements from she grain which can be
used by nature n assist In rebuilding
nerve centers that coffee may have broken
down.
Likewise Grkpe.Nuta food doe. not
cIre. anything. but Il does assist nature
tremendously In rebuilding, provided tho
undigcstible food that has been used IL
discontinued aud Grape Nuts taken In lie
place.
Charge No. 2 states that the passage
Of the National Food A Drugs Act com.
PEELED ~ 10 drop from the packages some
assertions regarding the nutritiye value
Of Grape Nuts.
We have never been compelled" 10
make any change.
Since the beginning Il has been a univer.
cal rule 10 print clearly on every package
fSaetly what the contents are made ".
Before the passage of tho Pure Food
law the packages stated that Grape Nuts
food was made Of wheat aud harley.
We did not esteem the small amount
OF salt and Yeast a. ~ value enough to
speak Of. but after tho new law came
IN We became ~ technical as the oil,
eiala AZ Washington and added the words
yeast" and salt" although we have
no recollection Of being asked 10.
We believed that our statement that
Grape Nuts will supply elements a. nour.
ish the brain and nerve crnters IL true
and bring authorities 10 support the fact
Some state chemists believed th,
gross rNaggcration and inaamuch NJ the
Food Dent Mt Washington could easily
haass grocers, pending trinl on tho
disputed question. we concluded that
much the better way would he 10 elm.
mate from our packages such claims.
however certain we may DO that the
claims are true,
Another statement objected TO read n,
follows;
'The systcm will ahscrh greater
smount Of nour-hmcnt if1m one pound
OF tfhpo nuts thun from ten .. unuH tf
meat wheat, oats. or bread
Some Department chemists deceive
themselves as we'll A. the public
"Caloricd" Il the word which define, a
unit NJ heat determined hy tho amount
necessary TO raise one k.lognm ~ water
one degree cvntigradr. On ihl. llss n
table NJ calnriCs BE- prepared showing ihH
percentage ut different Minds ~ fnl
Butter shows SGl. Grape Nuts 1Qi.
milk 90. Remember the statement ON
The package spoke oi the nonri,hmrnt thu
E.tem would lhsnrh. but did not ,pcll W
the c8lorics n heat contained In n, Tor
the heat Is not noutishmrnt. and tho
nourishmcut cannot be- judged hy the
number n heat units nntwithHHuli1g
The fact that certain chemists would have
the public believe 20,
A. an illustrations Attempt 10 feed
man fiytv DAYS ON butter alone. with its
sGo c1lnrics The man would dc o..
fore the experiment had run sixty days.
Then take mpcNuts with 901 and
milk with 90 tho two combined equal
4Gj onout one half che humble. ny DO
rice contained in huitgr Tho wn M il-
sixty DAYS ON this food would hs Won
nourishei, aud could live not only sixty