Bismarck daily tribune. [volume] (Bismarck, Dakota [N.D.]) 1881-1916, 1911-05-04

that
these delayed
that they extend sixty the
decision And will
tell why consider it unconstitutional
There departments
there three coordinate
this onsu
provided
legislative judicial they provided in their const
limitations had and that
provided the Of supervision
provided departments then
clearly the
and district courts
find that people this in their constitution provided that the
legislature do respect sal
compensation also fix the districts and
nothing else that the legislature do to control
courts further than that,
fearing that the attempt to con-
their constitutional convenon 1--WE will
said that the court
and supervising control all the IN
the court they
that should not be in other tribunal or
place. this exercises that
Lauder the court
call another Judge where affidavit of
judce had which
Judge Lauder contended in the
there and business of his
district and business
pie wait until he
could be heard before him.
Bm the court said in the exercise its supervisory
call another Judge and have these
not only have constitution but we have
Interpretation court which
control Now, they have it, the
supreme tell the legislative
for two bodies the legislature and the su-
And what Is 1t put supervisory con'ro' "nen ne esaue
"You must decide within
within a certain number of days. or
work according the rule that we lay down.
you Now let what of
these said.
attention the of Board OF County
decided by the court OF Kansas
u.s. This action involving the
contended that he could
had performed service The
preme there speaking Of
involved that isn't involved here
virtue 1924 Gen. St.
1882 is
unconstitutional His office
attendance by day discharge the additional duties
imposed upon by legislature
this should dis
command of the awmakng Such construction
commissioners
whether salard officers the and
all the particular enumerated
these saad posi-
The attorney paid salary and is not dependent
the office
whole His compensation does not with
the service arbitrarily by that body that
alone has the to designate it."
district judge fixed absolutely
cannot be changed and
holding
the salary depends the but the time served
his
to
there the legislature can't take him.
should it, he has been guilty
that the people think he they must
the the Of the and him
Office entitled his
The that call attention is that of Wyatt
Arnot by supreme California
Pa beginning page involving
had neglected decide submitted him, and had
finally office, and there action for damages for official
The 1T further alleged 9th
of September 1904 the evidence said case being closed and
made said was order of said duly sub
mted for final decision consideration said Ano then and there
that he did desire authorities Briefs but that he
ready submit said for final decision that he would decide
the short time and notify the attorney for the winning side
findings of fact and conclusions of law The respondent,
alleged after the trial of deon
departed from Alpine going Ell Dorado his
for election the office the latter Having elected
in November 1904 the respondent the 9TH day of November 1904
resigned judge of the superior Alpine thereafter
the of the the Hon. Clark Howard fill
said Office OF through respondents said
ton"
personal liability, skipping