The Columbia herald. [volume] (Columbia, Tenn.) 18??-1935, 1911-02-17
CIRCUIT COURT TO
TAKE Up ALL CIVIL
CASES IMMEDIATELY
DOCKET CONTAINS FoRTY-TWo
NUMBERS, TWENTY-FIVE OF
THEM BEING APPEALS.
ONLY II NEW SUNS FILED
Defendants Have Asked for New Trial
in Fifteen Cases, and Plaintiffs In
Ten--LousviIIe G. Nashville Rail-
road Figures Strongly.

road Figures Strongly.
The February term Of the circuit
court will take up the civil docket
containing forty-two cases, immedi
ately after converting here Monday
morning. The great majority of these
cases are appeals, only seventeen
new cases having been filed. The de
PENDANTS have appealed in fifteen in
stances and the plaintiffs in ten. The
Louisville & Nashville Railroad has
been made defendant in eight cases
while the Middle Tennessee Railroad
has two and the N, G. & st. L. one.
The docket follows:
L. Anderson VS.. l.. & N. Railroad
Co., defendant appeal, Feb. 20.
]. S. Tucker vs.. Independent Phos-
phate Co., Feb. %.
City of Columbia vs.. Clarence
Thompson, defendant appeal, Feb. 20
T. w. Stephens vs.. Hugh Merrill,
admr. ct al, Feb. 20.
Nichols & Shelley vs. Western
Union Telegraph Co., defendant ap-
peal, Feb. 81.
8. P. Stockard VS.. l.. & N. Railroad
Co., Feb. 81.
J. w. Patten VS.. J. L. Cheatham,
SANDER. Feb. 81.
d. J. Whitney VS.. Charles B. Not
grass, plaintiff appeal, Feb. 81.
B. c. Bailey VS.. Charleston 5. C.
Aiming Co. and the Virginia Chemical
Co. Feb. 20.
State use Mt. Pleasant vs.. Ella
Moore, selling liquor without license.
defendant appeal, Feb. %.
City of Columbia VS. William Whit
&ker, profanity defendant appeal;
oscond case. for resisting an officer;
no date set
Elem Thomas VS.. L. & N Railroad
Co., Feb. %.
State use Mt. Pleasant Va. Dee
Jones, selling liquor without license,
defendant appeal, Feb. %.
T. l.. Rainey ct al VS.. l.. & N. Rail-
road Co., defendant appeal, Feb. %.
w. J. Moore vs.. Ripley Steele, de-
PENDANT appeal, Feb. %.
E. N. Alexander VS.. l.. & N. Rail-
road Co., Feb. "a.
w. c. Salmon admir-, vs. L. & N.
Railroad Co., Feb q.
T. J. Johnson vs.. Samuel Baker,
plaintiff appeal, Feb. "a.
Mrs. A. P. Smith, admir-. VS.. L. &c N.
Railroad Co., Feb. q.
e. w. Brooks VS.. N, C. & st. L.
Railroad Co., Feb. q.
Mrs. Sallie B. Knight VS.. William
M. Green, Feb. 81.
Middle Tennessee Railroad Co VS..
"A. H. Forgey, plaintiff appeal, land
controversy, FeD. II.
Josie Ingram vs.. Life & Casualty,
plaintiff appeal, Feb. %.
Maury County Road. Commission
VS. J. B. Morrow ct al, defendant ap-
peal, Feb. %.
R. E. Haynes VS.. R. M. Williams, 2
cases, plaintiff appeal, March l.
H. Weeden VS.. L. & N. Railroad Co.,
defendant appeal, Feb. %.
w. J. Yancey vs.. Macon Green, de-
fendant appeal, March 1.
Dobbins & Ewing vs. j. c. Taylor,
plaintiff appeal, March /.
]. E. Shouse VS.. w. w. wilkins, de-
PENDANT appeal, March l.
Advance Thresher Co., vs. Willie
cases, plaintiff appeal,
March 1.
Mrs. L. B. Ingram VS.. ]. e. Brown
dow ct al, plaintiff appeal, March 2.
L. F. Church vs.. L. G N. Railroad
Co, defendant appeal, March 2.
Joe M. Reed VS.. John HUFFMAN,
plaintiff appeal, March 8.
B. A. Satterfield Va. Thomas P. Har
Olson, defendant appeal, March 8.
w. s. Notgrass VS.. l.. & N. Railroad
Co, March 3.
State vs.. John T. and r. E. Akin,
March 8.
J. s. Beasley VS.. Columbia Produce
Co, plaintiff appeal, March 8.