Tombstone epitaph., 1911-07-02
Doings In the
 District Court
THURSDAY.

iollow business pending before the district court
 h the case of Albert Heffern vs the Heffern Mining company. sn sction D for accounting. tbe report of the aud itor was presented to the court and ordered filed, the same being excepted to by the deieodant and twenty dave asked to file their exception and twenty days thereafter granted to the plaintiff to file reply. The books were ordered returned to the secretary of the company on motion of the de. sendsnt. The motion for . change of venue was granted and the same or dersi transferred to the fret judicial district ct Tucson for trial.
 The case of Parotte Deals & Com pany vs Scott and Thornton. for debt. wac continued for the term.
 In the case of the territory of Ari- zons, at the relation and to the uee oiC. W. Hicks. tax collector, vs the Tombstone Consolidated Mines com psny, sn action for back taxes, in which judgment was recently granted 70 the plaintiff in the sum of about $6000, c motion Tor new trial on the part of ,he defendant was overruled
 In the United States court, the case of the government vs Kusng Lee 6 petition to cancel certificate of nat uralization, was ordered dismissed upon motion of the United States Attorney.
 The case oi the Territory vs Lee Ramsey, contempt proceedings, the same wss called for trial, and after the arguments of the attorpeys had been presented to the court. the de- fendsnt was ordered released.
 The case of the Globe Tailoring company ys Scott < Thornton, for debt, was continued by the court for further evidence.
 The case of D Spires vs the swsnee Fire ..Insurance company, for debt, wse continued for the term by the consent of counsel on both sides. The same action was taken in the case of D Spires vs the Uuion As. suIauoe Society ioI debt.
 The case of W s Morrill,, for divorce was ordered dismissed from the civil docket for want Of persecution.
 In the case Of the Los Angeles Trust { Saving. Bank ?. .he In.e.n.tionsl Light snd Power company ct al, fore closure of trust .tesd, the receivers sale was confirmed by the court and the receiver discharged and the bond e1 onorsted.
 The divorce case of Lemons vs Lemons was partially tried and con- tinued for further evidence and set for trial on July F. The plaintiff is 6 resident Of Pearce.
 FRIDAY
 To the district court yesterday sf- ternoop the courts attention was talk CD up in the consideration of the case of the Young Construction com- psny vs the Cicero Smith Mining company, sn action for debt, alleged to be due the plaintiff in the sum Of Fl ,206 70 for oil tauks, air compress or and accessories. Alter . number of witnesses had been called to tertify for both sides, and the case submitted. the court grsDted judgment to the plaintiff in the srm of $607. 40. The Cicero Smith Mining company is operating about IS miles from Will GOT.
 During today e session of the dis- trict court, which wac . busy o1e, the following matters were disposed of,- CS Powers, ct al. ys J W Gould ct al, appeal from justice court, judg. ment granted defendant; appeal filed by plaintiff.
 W W Poindexter vs EP & SW R. R company. appeal from justice court, ordered dismissed cr ncson 0! de!ecd ant ss per stipulation.
 Henry Clifford vs P B Warneksos. damage suit long standing, ordered dismised on motion of plaintiff
 Allen English VI Henry Hslderman ct sl, for debt. continued for term. In the case of the Arizons Mutr. Savings 6 Loan Aes'n vs Viola Dou- Unit, deceased, ct al for debt W Wallace, sdtn. was substituted.
 James K Delvin vs Efs Delvin, for divorce. Continued for evidence. Houck & Deiter vs George Bssvin, action for replevin, is on trial. Monday last Prof E R Rice. Of the |