Cut Bank pioneer press. [volume] (Cut Bank, Mont.) 1909-current, 1911-07-14

volved by the hard work he did to get
what admittedly was justice in the
case. The captain did not want a bad
precedent established and SO even
though the amount was small as it
was he made a fight for his w
Captain Conrad paid $32.S5 extra
duty money to certain enlisted men.
The men had earned it and were en-
titled to the money by a regulation
which had existed for years. The cap
tain discovered that Uncle Sam had
revoked the extra pay regulation, but
had neglected to notify the quarter
masters. Uncle Sam is unreasonable
at times. He stopped $32.S5 out OF
Captain Conrad's pay and practically
told the officer he should have known
in some mysterious way that the gov
eminent had an order slowed away in
a vault somewhere hat extra duty pay
had been cut out.
Captain Conrad was over five years
trying to get back his $32.85, and he
stuck to the task like the good fighter
that he is. Permission finally was
/ granted by the secretary of war, the
lieutenant general of the army and
the quartermaster general to Captain
Conrad to try to get a bill passed by
congress to reimburse him for the
robbery perpetrated by Uncle Sam
some time prior to the Spanish war.
DR.. T. S. Palmer who for years has
had charge Of the general matter Of
game bird protection for the depart
ment of agriculture frequently has
sent out warnings to the effect that
the wild fowl of the country were be-
ing exterminated rapidly and If this
valuable food supply assets were to
be saved something must be done to
check the slaughter Of the ducks and
the geese.
A Massachusetts member of con-
gress aided and abetted by a western
member. had had plans before the
house for years which he thinks If put
into effect will compass the salvation
of the ducks, the geese, the swans and
for that matter all birds that are mi
gratory in their habits. If this plan is
ever allowed to reach the floor of con.
gress for debate there will be more
constitutional points raised than were
brought up during the rapid fire OF
verbal interchanges between the great
constitutional lawyers of the senate
when the railroad rate question was
under consideration.
There was success in getting the
bird saving plan before congress, but
not in the form that would allow
open discussion in the house. The bill
was drawn, introduced and sen to the
committee on judiciary where it was
the subject OF both humorous and Sc
rious comment. If this bill were evel
to become a law 1t unquestionably
would tend to save the game birds O
the country from determination an(
congress has been told, what mos
people have realized, that the game o
the United States is a valuable econo
mic asset and that 1t is possible tt
eat the game birds and still have
them.
The member who fathered the meas
use said that the only way to saw
the game birds was to pass a nationa
law against their destruction except II
: certain short, close seasons. OF cours.
t the general understanding is that tn
states alone must legislate on tn,
: game birds within their borders. Tn
western members declared hat mas
much as game birds were migrator.
5 and took their flight from one state t
: another they were subject to the law
governing interstate commerce. 20
railroad" he said. crosses a state lin
and Uncle Sam has charge of legisls
ton affecting It. The same rule an
the same right apply to birds"
s Now it may seem the extremity Q
~foolishness to the layman AND poss
9 bly, to most lawyers, but some shinin
legal lights in Washington held tina
d the reasoning of the father of the bir
protection measure was good reason