The Washington herald., 1911-05-16


Present: The Chief Justice Mr.. Justice Harlan.
Mr. Justice McKenna, Mr.. Justics Holmes. Mr..
Justice Day. Mr.. Justice LuTtou, Mr.. Justice
Hughes. Nj. Justice Van DeEanter and Mr.. Justice
Lamar.
John J. stamler. of Elizabeth. n. J.: George
Ffankenstein, Of Weehawken, n. j.; Charles H.
Sloan, st Geneva, Nebr.; James c. Agnew. town
Of Union, n. j.: Harry II. McElruy. Of Tucumcan'
n. Mex; Harvey Eugene Kelley of Denror, Colo;
William P Golden, Of San Francisco. Cal; Harold
T. Clark Of Clereland Ohio; John Rustsard. Of
Juneau. Alaska: Edwin Allston Hill. Of Washington
D. C.; Clayton J. Heermance. Of New York CllS'
N Y; Edward A. Douthitt, Of Honolulu, Territory
d Hawaii; J. H Langley Of Pryor, Okla Roger
Sherman Gates Boutell, Of Washington, d. T.;
Frederick ]. Stone Of New York City; walter Z.
English, Of Washington, D. c.; W. B. Crawford.
Of KissisSimee, Fla; John ]. Cook. Of Milwaukee,
Wis; John A Hope, Of st. Louis. Mo-; Henry
Love Clarke. of Chicago Ill; John Y. Hewett. OF
White Oaks. N Mex; Frederick E. Stivers 6
Kansas City, Mo- and Henry NJ. johnson, Il
Louisville. Ky, admitted to practice.
No. ST. Samuel GompTs, John Mitchell. and
Frank Morrison retitoners VS.. The Bucks Stove
and Range Company; writ of certioran to the
Court Of Appeals Of the District Of Columbia; yidg-
ment reversed with Costs and caIse renlanded with
directions to reverse the judgment Of the supreme
Court of the Distinct OF Columbia and remand the
TO that court, with directions that the con-
tempt proceedings Instituted by the Bucks stove
and Range Company be dismissed. but without
rreildce TO the power and right OF the supreme
Court of the District of Columbia TO punish by
proper proceeding contempt. if any. committed
against it Opinion by Mr.. Justice Lamar.
No. s3l. Texas and New Orleans Railroad ON
many ct al paintiffs in error Fannie Miller ct
al: in 70 The Court Of Civil Appeals for Inc
Fourth Surrerne judicial district of the State OF
Texas; Judgment affirmed with costs olhhlon oy
Mr.. Justice Van Deyanter
No. So Texas and New Orleans Railroad Com
pany ct al. plaintiffs in e1rr vs.. Felix Gross et
al; in error TO the Court OF CaEn Aplssais Iof ue
Fourth Supreme Judicial district Of the State OF
Texas: judgment affirmed with costs. Opinion by
Nh. Justice Van DeyaEter
No. l3. The Grand Trunk Western Railway Com
rzny. plaintiff in error The Railruad Commission
Of Indiana ct al. tn the Appellate Court Q
the State Of Indiana; Judgment affirmed with costs
Opinion By Mr.. Justice Van Deyanter.
No. I49. Sergeant & Lahr ct al. plaintiffs in
error vs. Herrick & Stevens: in to the Su-
preme Court Uf the State Of Iowa; Judgment re-
versed with costs and re4nanded for further
proceedings in conformity with the opinion Of this
court Opinion by Mr. Justice Van Devanter.
No. 7p. Christopher c. Wilson. plaintiff in error.
The United States; in to the Circuit Court
of the United States for the Southern district of
New York: Judgment affirmed OPINION by Mr.. Jus
tice Hughes Dissenting: Mr.. Justice McKenna.
No. 76O. Christopher c. Wilson plaintiff in error.
Of the United States for the Southern district II
New York: final order affirmed. Opinion by MIR.
Justice Hughes. Dissenting: Mr.. Justice Mcherna
No. 7ss CHRISTOPHER c: Wilson, ;e apIelLant ant, Fs.
the United States for the Southern district Of New
York. Final order affirmed. Opinion by Mr.. Justice
Hughes Dissenting: Mr.. Justice Mchenna
No 35S. William Dreier, plaintiff IN error, vs.
The United States: error TO the Circuit Court
Of the United States for the Southern district II
New York; and
No 359 William DreiCr appellant. William
Henkel, United States marshal. &c; appeal from
the Circuit Court Of the United States for the
Southern district of New York; iudgTnent and final
order affirI4ed. Opinion 10y Mr. Justice Hughes
(Mr Justice MCkgTOa the result
the ground Of waiverl
No. @. Liverpool and London and Globe Insur
Company Of New York. plaintiff in error. VS..
The Board Of Assessors # the Parish Of Orleans ct
al. .IrUr 10 the Supreme Court Of the State Of
Louisiana: Judgment affirmed with costs Opinion
by Mr.. Justice Hughes.
No 81. Orient Insurance Con.uany ct al, plain
tiffs in crrUr The Board Of Assessors for the
Parish Of Orleans IT al; in error 10 the Supreme
Court Of the State Of louisiana: judgmcnt affirmed
with costs. Opinion by Mr. Justice Hughes.
No. lGT. Charles II. Merillat and Mason y.
Richardson trustees, appellants. vs.. Melville ID.
Hensey ct al; appeal fran the Court Of Appeals |
Of the District Of Columbia; decree affirmed with |
costa Opinion by Mr.. Justice LurtOn.
No. 60. Marctie Tiger. plaintiff in error. vs.. The |
Western Investment Company Il al; IN error TO
the supreme Court Of the State If Oklahoma:
Judgment revCrsd with costs and cause re1nanded
for further proceedings not inconsistent with the
opinion of this o1urt- Opinion hy Mr.. Justice
Day.
No 50. Simon TaIlowell vs.. The United States:
OH a certificate from 'he United Statrs Circuit
Court 4 AII--als fcr the Eighth circuit question
certified answered the affirmative. Opinion by
Mr.. Ju~tir DAY.
u. 81. Catherine scllemmcr. rcw Catherine
Craig. plaintiff n The Buffalo. Rochester
and PittStrlrg Railway Company: in TO the
supreme Court + the State Of Pennsylvania; JldE-
rnent affirmed with costs Opinion ty Mr.. Justice
DAY.
40. l3l. Irlis A Dowell. jr. and Wilson W
in error to the SrIrrcme Court of the Philippine
Islands: Judgment affirmed. oTdrion by Mr.. Justice
Day. Dissenting. Mr.. Justice Harlan.
No. l39. Mark Jacobs. appellant vs. joseph
Bcecham; appeal from the United States Circuit
Court Of Appeals for the Second circuit. Decree
affirmed with cnsts, and canSa rcmanded To the
Circuit Court Of the United States for the Eastern
district of New York Opinion by Mr.. Justice
Holmes.
No. los. In the matter of George Harris. hank
ruIr; On a certificate from the United states Cir
cIit Court Of ATI-.aIs for the Second circuit;
question certified answered in the affirmative Orin-
ion by Mr.. Justice H"lmc~
No. 63S Christopher StTassheim. sheriff &c. ar-
reliant. vs Milton Daley: APPEAL from the Dis
tr1ct Court q the United States f the Northern
district Of Illinois: final order reversed with
costs. and cause rcmandcd for further proceedings
Opinion by Mr.. Justice Holmes.
n. 96. Charles West, attorney general Of the
State Of Oklahoma. appellant. vs. The Kansas
Natural Gas Company ct al. appeal from the
CrCIit Court Of the United States for the East
en- district of Oklahoma; decree affirmed with
costs. OpiuiOn nv Mr.. Justice MCkrnna. Dis
IT. Il
and Mr. Justice Hughes.
No 3li. The United States. plaintiff in error. VS.
T.. Hammers; in the District Court Of the
I nited States for the Southern district Of Cali
fornla: Judgment reversed. and renanded for
further urrCetdinEs in conformity with the opinion
Of this Opinibn by Mr.. Justice McKenna.
No 100. The Hannibal Bridge Company and The
Wabash Railroad Company. plaintiffs in error.
The United States; in error to the District Court |
of the United States for the Eastern district Of
Missouri; Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Mr.. Justice
Harlan.
No. III. Northern Pacific Railway Company ct al.
appellants, vs.. John TrUdck aTpsal frrIn the United
States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth cir
cult decree affirmed with costs and re1nanded
to the Circuit Court of the United States for the
District of Montana Opinion by Mr.. Justice Har-
Ian. Il
No. 80. The Chicago Burlington and Quincy
Railroad Company. petitioner. The United
States; wit of crTtiorai to the United States
Circuit Court Of Appeals for the Eighth circuit:
Judgment affirmed. and rpmanded to the Dis
trict Court Of the United States for the District of
Nebraska. Opinion by Mr.. Justice Harlan.
No S. F, VI. Delk, petitioner VS.. St. Louis and
orar the United States Circuit Court Of Appeals
Ion the Sixth crIit Judgment Of the Circuit OJurt
Il Appeals reversed with costs and Judgment of the
Sr-Iit Court Of :he United States for the Western
district Of Tennessee affirmed with costs and cause
emanded TO said Circuit Court Opinion by Mr..
Justice Harlan. INr. Justice LurtOn did not par |
icipate in the decision of this crt in this case.
No l53. The United States. petitioner, Daniel
!. Rimcr ct al; writ of cerioran to the United
states Circuit Court nf Appeals for the Fourth cir
-Iit: writ Of certiorai dismissed. Opinion by Mr..
|hief Justice White. G
No. sSS. Henry A. Wis., plaintiff in error VI. a
lawrence Fl. Mills ct al: in error to the Circuit