Manchester Democrat. [volume] (Manchester, Iowa) 1875-1930, 1911-09-20

marriage on February 10. 1919
That ths
claim some interest in that port ton {, g
said real estate described as Lot Four
said claims are derived from the fac
said Lot Fourteen 90. from james
Gy1ee BY aeed
u.s. in the Recorders office Of Deiawar,
County. Iowa. and that the records O
Delaware County. Iowa. do not shoV
The t Sse
Information and belief that said ElleI
Carrigan for q valuable consideration
sss f. sis a9 Gs
described in Paragraph One of sale
petition. to Thomas Carrigam by a war.
ranty deed dated July s.. p and Re re,
Iowa that by mistake the said Lo!
Fourteen ~ was omitted from rom sac ths
s si deed d and Hths said n Thomas Garrigai
the grantee therein. were husband and
said dsed hs and a1 ths9 they tSen
cunving all Of the real estate describ.
ed in Paragraph One OF said petition as
q homestead. that the said Thomas Car;
estate described In Paragraph One OF
said petition as homestead until he
sold said premises to Ross M Peek. the
plaintiff herein. on June 22nd. 1871.
That the interest. Il any, claimed By
the defendant. John ". Bush. In and
against one Thomas Carrigan. which
Judgment was originally r END In JUS
SCRIPT fo Thereon eG Il he s Sistret eourt
on January IL, 1883, and entered oil
record. in Reos FL Ps eei siS Of h
said Judgment was at no time lien
Upon the real estate described in Para
graph One of said petition for the rea.
lime said Judgment was rendered. and
vas also his homestead at the time ths
was upon
said Thomas Carrigah continuously oc-
:upied and used said real estate as a
i,oinsstead until the 22nd day Of June
eyed said realty to the plaintiff. And
he plaintiff further AYERS that saif
judgment was not a lien upon any rea'
:hased said lots from said Thomas CAR
igan. for the reason that more thar
.wenty ye&sAs had elapsed since the fill
ing OF said judgment In said distric}
That whatever claims or interest the
,ollowing named defendants or any Of
hem have In the zeal estate described
derived by virtue OF their being lineal or
collateral DESCENDANTS of David More
ana 5esss Bailiy or Samuel
Inc Moreiand. Nancy Morrissey, T. 4.
Moreland; Margaret Bristol Louisa Gill
Sxa aesa@ 9ossph
;. Moreland, Mrs A.. B. Moreland, Mrs
4, a Moreland. Lizzie Moreiand. Ida
and Me1s'snd Ms 5Ss MFRS %rs
cine: S Peek. M Ms. Frank steadmnn.
S S,sha. Knee Res. E NsSa,a Knee FTesman
nan, w N. Sawyer. G: =. Sawyer. r.
:; Sawyer, Edward Dittmer. Watson
Irthur SAWYER. Arthur Pa anss 'a Hugh
,ert; Williamson. Nsllis EigeloW. Rich
I'd ,dua Banily. A.D HSlbrook. Lucille Fork.
lendall, Louise Baily
Said petition recites that the mode Of
evolution Of the interests or alleged
efendants. "a % sheirs-at-law. surviving
rantees, mortgages OF judgment cred
nts named therein.
Said petition recites that the names
nd residences Of the unknown Defend
hts are unknown to the plaintiff: that
ne plaintiff has made. or caused to be
iauei dIigent search and inquiry to as
ertain the names and places of resi-
ence Of the defendants. the unknown
aimants and the unknown defendants
! this action, II any there are. and that
e Is unable to describe them more full
or definitely than Is contained in the
etition and this notice.
0ofd ,o+f<fa- ro.t<o. 49, 81
lose under whom he claims title to
le real estate described in the first
thereof, have been in the adj
arse possession Of the said real estate
r more than ten years last past: that
I'D possession has been actual, open.
sible. notorious. adverse. contin-
,us. exclusive: and undisturbed
lder color Of title and claim
right and hostile to the defend
ITS and each OF them. and to all the
orld. and. the defendants. and each Of
EN-, their spouses. heirs-at-law. de-
sees. !egatees, assigns, and legal rso-l'
and I'll persons clstming