The Salt Lake tribune. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1890-current, 1911-10-23
|[ATTLE WOMAN IN
/ idaho ASKS DIVORCE
Is. Fred Rice, Wife of Busl-
ness Man of Sound City,
Files Her Petition.
AARRIED FOR MONEY
Avs Husband Told Her He
Loved Another; Gives
q Name of "Affinity."
AARRIED FOR MONEY

.scisl 10 The Tribune.
'-otsT. Ida. Oct. 22.--Seatilo 5 Eildeo
"A realm broke into 1daho'S divorce
80 and Roises divorce colony here
"a week, when Laure Rice nee Laura
..rboltzer. said TO be one of the social
LAr.fof Seattle. iiled a petition for d,-
&c before Judge McClane III the dis
sst court on the ground chat her nus
IA Fred Rice. Seattle business man,
.fntly informed her within ono month
<sr their marriage that hc only mar
"A her for her money, and having ac-
'o,nlishnd his aim lie proposed 10 have
1ffinitv or TO court other women, She
',,,es AS correspondent. Miss Nina ker-
~ os Gle Elum Wash. Miss herman
kliown TO be of a prominent ana p,o-
"a family OF western Washington.
tociaI circles of Seattle arc said 10 be
|caflv interested in the outcome of the
|1e due to the prominence OF the Rices,
4, are renoited here TO be numbered
1onr The most exclusive social set of
ID CITY. Mrs. Rice has taken up her
sidence here in Boise, but refuses to be
marathon. as well aS declines 10 go into
4 details OF her matrimonial affairs.
Petition Of Woman.
some OF the facts surrounding the
srrinonial troubles Of Mr.. and Mrs; Rice
: gained from the application which is
A file here IN the district court. Accord
Z Ia il they were married i'll Seattle
I a brilliant wedding December l. 1910.
'1css than year ago. Even while on
elr honeymoon Mrs. Rice gained her
Sd intimation that her husband did not
re her. She states the shock was a
rrible one. During one Of their con-
a thai time Mrs Rirp
IT'S that her husband informed her
n he didn't love her. but instead loved
ma Herman OF Gle Elur. Wash, and
h her that he only married her for
d money. He took pains To embarraSs
r BY telling the same thing 10 her
1st Intimate friends.
n was after this. states the complaint.
al Rice called upon Miss Herman and
pofnpunied her TO the lheaier. lie re-
lined out after midnight, thereby
oeklns his but recently acquired
0use Adding 10 her chagrin, declares
IS. Rice. her husband persisted In
fplng company with his affinity and
hen tliis was not possible he wrote let
rs to her in the presence of his en-
Eed young wife. One OF these very
dearing epistlcs she says that she tore
pm his grasp. but he merely remarked
at Was all right as there was plenty
more paper and ink and he could
Z SAT down before her and proceeded
.yrilc the letter which he later mailed.
Mrs Rice declares that this correspon-
'pcc was kept UP between hcr husband
ID his affinity. regardless Of her ef-
r1s rs have il stopped. Realizing. she
IS. that she could do nothing with her
'yward husband. she decided 10 go TO
q mother. which she did
Ine wife states that since she has left
4. husband he has openly expressed the
*n and the hope that she remains with
2 mother and away from him Mrs
&c also asserts that her husband in
med her that he intended 10 marry
ss herman. She therefore prays for
iPEal separation and restoration OF her
'lden name. and although she does not
riudp any of the letters that passed
tHeen her husband and bis affinity.
2 deciares That she can produce them
'pn the court order. should the court
press wish 10 see them. They viii
'opaplN he placed on record when the
'sc is aned AZ the next term Of the
strict court