The Wilson times. [volume] (Wilson, N.C.) 1896-19??, 1911-11-24
Another
ROAD DEAL
EIENING'S MONEY MAI GO TO
CLERK OF COURT TO BE AP-.
Piled ON ALIMONY
APPEALS SUPREME COURT
(By w. J. Martin.)

(By w. J. Martin.)
Raleigh. n. c., Nov. 23.-The i re-
1=rninary steps for what is believed
iii be another very important rail
,oad deal are in progress here IN
t,at Capt. J. NJ. Turner, general man
Ger of the Georgia and Florida rail-
road is here as receiver for the Ral-
eioh and Charleston Railroad, Mar
IN S. c., to Lumberton, preparing
tic final papers for the discharge OF
he receivership by Judge Connor, IN
ne Federal court. The affairs OF tne
raceivership have been pracucally
closed for a long while but no dls-
charge of the receiver has been maue
7nd it is stated on good authority tnat
an impending transfer OF the roau 70
me or another of the larger systems
If the State is pending, eltner the
atlantic Coast Line or the NorfolK
and Southern at Lumberton TINS roau
connects with the Virginia ana caro-
lima Southern which extends toWaru
Fayetteville to Hope Mills ana mas
a branch to ElizabethtoWn. WllIon
Mclean is president and 1t IS creo!C-
ed to be allied with the Atlanuc
Coast Line. 1t is believed that deal
Is on to link up these lines IN ol-
rect line, Raleigh via FayeIteVllle 10
Charleston and that such purchase
il in line with the recent purchases
by the Norfolk and Southern OF the
Raleigh and Southport, and other
1aes and with the belief advanced
here that the Norfolk Southern, Al
1sntic Coast Line and Norfolk and
Western are a big cooperating DEAL
If not Dlan of murger with the Penn
sylvania whereby a gigantic Southern
system for impending Panama canal
MULTIPLICATION of Southern business
will be provided for.
Another move in the sensational
divorce and alimony Litigation pc
tween Percy B. Fleming, former tell
er of the State treasury, and ms
wife, who was Miss nellie Clare
Crouch, daughter of H. E. Crouch, OF
the United States Treasury depart
Taent at Washington transplred TO-
1ay when an order was issued py
Judge PEBBLES for Percy Fleming TO
appear before him at Goldsboro, De
cember 4, and show cause why
bankruptcy exemptions he is to re-
ceive very soon now should not pc
paid over to the clerk of the court
here for application to payment OF
alimony ordered by Judge PEBBLES TO
be paid for the support OF Mrs. fIem-
ing and two children, who are now
with Mrs. Fleming's father In WASH
iagton. Suit for divorce by Mrs. Flem-
ing and counter suit by Percy M
fleming are to be tried at the March
term of the Wake superior court
when the whole scope of the family
troubles of the Flemings will be ar
ed
Cadet, Nathaniel D. Hargroye OIL
the A. & NJ. s>ollege here was fof-
hidden early in the season by MS
parents, Mr.. and Mrs. Arthur w.
Hargrove, of Washington, to play on
tae football team. He joined the team
under the assumed name of Harris
and gained first rank as a player. His
parents learned Of his playing anu
Mrs. Hargrove came to Raleigh and
required his retirement. However to-
day permission came from Richmond
for him to get in the game and ne IS
to be in the lineup at Norfolh
Thanksgiving.
There were nineteen appeals IN
yolved in the batch of opinions de-
livered by the Supreme court TINS
weekly delivery day, one OF the
most notable being Elicit VS. Elicit,
from Rockingham county, in which a
ruling of error in the trial means
that there will be new trial IN the
ease in which F. M. Elicit procured
in the former trial decree OF dl>
Vorce from his wife. Elicit lives at
Spray Mr. Elicit being an expert
designer Of cotton cloth patterns TOT
the Morehead mills there. The 1ull
list of opinions, follows:
Vaughan and Barnes VS. Davenport
from Pitt, action dismissed.
Horton VS. Seaboard Air Line Rail-
way, Wake, error.
Harden VS. C. & o. Railroad, Wake,
NO error
Red Springs Hotel Co, vs. Town OF
Red Springs, Robson, affirmed.
Sanders VS. Sanders, Union; ~a1nrm-
ed.
Brite VS. Penny, Guilford, no error.
Lexington Grocery Co., VS. Philadei-
phia Casualty Co., Davidson, afnrm
ed
Walker VS. Cannon Manufacturing
CO., Rowan, no error.
Barnhardt VS. Commissioners OF
Lexington, affirmed.
Osborn VS. Durham, Stanly, no er
ror
Sexton VS. Greensboro Life Insur
ahce Co. Davidson, new trial.
Elicit VS. Elicit, Rockingham, error
Fulp and Linvil1e VS. Light anc