davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-12-01

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
state of Washington for King County.
Summons by Publication.
Estella M. Smith,, plaintiff, vs.. William
A. Smith, defendant.--No.
The State Of washington, to the said
William A. Smith, defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty (60) days after the date
of the first publication Of this summons,
to~wit: within sixty days after the 18th
day of September, 1911, and defend the
above entitled action in the above en-
titled court, and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff, and serve copy of
your answer upon the undersigned at
torney for plaintiff at his Office below
stated and in case OF your failure so
to do, Judgment will be rendered against
you according to the demand of the COM
plant, which has been filed with the
clerk OF said court. The object of the
said action and the relief sought to be
obtained therein is fully set forth In
said complaint, and is briefly stated as
follows:
TO obtain a Judgment of said court
granting divorce to piainttm from you
and TO dissolve and sever the marriage
relations now existing between piaintln
and you upon the grounds or desertion
and non-support.
Attorney for PLAINTIFF.
Postoffice and office address, 201-2O3
Burke Building, Seattle, County or King,
State OF washington.
Sept. 29--Nov. 10, 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-12-01

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King County.
Carrie King, plaintiff. VS.. VIM. Her
bert King, defendant.
No. S3601.
The State of Washington to the said
VIM Herbert King, defendant.
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication of this summons, to-
wit: Within sixty days after the goth
day of October, 1911, and defend the
above entitled action in the above en-
titled court, and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff, and serve a copy Of
your answer upon the undersigned at
torney for plaintiff at his orfice below
stated. and in. case of your failure SO
to do, judgment will be rendered against
you according to the demand of the
complaint, which has been filed with
the clerk of said court. The object Of
the above entitled action is to obtain
a divorce by the plaintiff from the de-
PENDANT on the grounds of habitual
drunkenness and failure to support.
GEO. MCKAY,
Plaintiffs Attorney.
P. o. Address, $50 Arcade Building,
Seattle, King County, Washington.
Oct. 20, Nov, Dec /, 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-12-01
Friday, December I, 1911.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State Of Washington, for the County
of King. IN Probate. Order to snow
cause why distribution should not be
made.
In the Matter of the Estate of James
Mccarthy, deceased.--No. 1881.
I4ottie Mccarthy, administrators or the
estate of James Mccarthy, deceased, hav-
ing filed in this court her petition set
ting forth that said estate is now in
condition to be closed and is ready for
distribution OF the residue thereof among
the persons entitled by law thereto, and
disappearing to the court that said Pc
tition sets forth facts sufficient to au-
thoriEe distribution of the residue OF
said estate:
1t is therefore ordered by the court
that all persons interested in the estate
of the said James Mccarthy, deceased,
be and appear before the said SUPERIOR
Court of King County, State of Washing
ton, at the court room of the Probate
Department of said court in the City of
Seattle ,on the 9th day of November,
1911, at the hour of $3.50 o'clock a. m,
of said day then and there to show
cause, If any they have, why an order
of distribution should not be made of
the residue of said estate among the
heirs and persons in said petition mem
toned, according to law.
1t Is further ordered, that copy OF
this order be published once week for
four successive weeks before the said
9Th day Of November, 1911, in The Seat
tie Republican, newspaper printed and
published in said King County and of
general circulation therein.
Done in open court this End day of
october, 1911.
Judge.
Oct 6-Nov. 8. 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-12-01

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington for King County.
George w: Farlin, plaintiff, VS.. Jack
son Realty Co., and all persons I'M
known, if any. having or claiming an
interest in and to the hereinafter de-
scribed real property, defendants.
Notice and Summons.
State of Washington: To the above
defendants and each of them:
You and each of you, as owners,
claimants or holders OF an interest or
estate in and to the hereinafter de-
scribed real property, are hereby noti-
fled that the above named plaintiff is
the holder of one certain delinquent
tax certificate issued by the Treasurer
dated the 9Th day Of May. 1911. and
numbered as follows, for the delinquent
taxes of the following year, in the
following amount, and upon the real
East Seattle Addition, Lot 43, Block
23, Certificate No. B68143, 1907, 99c.
That the taxes for the following prior
by the plaintiff upon said above de-
scribed real property, to-wit:
Lot 4S, Block 20, East Seattle Addi-
Lot IS, Block %, East Seattle Addi-
Lot 4s, Block 20, East Seattle Addi-
ton, $1.O1, 1910.
Which several sums bear interest at
the rate of Is per cent. per annum
from said date of payment, and are all
the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon
and against said real property.
You and each of you (including said
persons unknown, if any), are hereby
further notified and summoned to be
and appear within sixty days after the
date of first publication of this notice.
exclusive of the day of said first pub
LEGATION November 8, 1911. in the above
entitled court and action; and defend
this action and answer the complaint of
said plaintiff, and serve copy of your
answer on the undersigned attorney
for plaintiff at his office below stated,
or pay the amount due, together with
interest and costs. In case you fail so
to do, judgment will be rendered herein,
foreclosing the lien of said taxes and
costs against each parcel of said real
property for the sums and amounts due
upon and charged against each, for said
taxes, interest and costs, ordering a
sale of each parcel of said property for
the satisfaction of the sums charged
and found against it respectively as
provided by law, and as prayed in plain
tiffs complaint, now on file in this cause
and Court.
GEORGE w. FARLIN,
Plaintiff
CHAS. P. HARRIS,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
Office address 802 Lowman Block,
Seattle, Washington.
Nov & Dec. Is, 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-12-01
SUMMONS By PuB11cAT1oN.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington for King County.
David Forrest WEIGH, plaintiff, VS.. Sa-
rah Ellen Welch, defendant.
The State of Washington, to the said
Sarah Ellen Welch, defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty 600 days after the date
of the first publication of this summons,
to-wit: within sixty days after the 22nd
day of September, A. d. 1911, and de-
fend the above entitled action in the
above entitled Court, and answer the
complaint of the plaintiff and serve a
copy of your answer upon the under
signed attorney for plaintiff at his Of
flee below stated; and in case OF your
failure so to do, judgment will be rem
dered against you according to the de-
mand of the complaint, which has been
filed with the Clerk of said Court. The
object Of the said action and the RELIEF
sought to be obtained therein is fully
set forth in said complaint, and Is brief
ly stated as follows:
To obtain a judgment of said Court
granting a divorce to plaintiff from you
and to dissolve and sever the marriage
relations now existing between plaintiff
and you upon the grounds of incompat-
Utility Of temperament, and personal
indignities rendering life burdensome.
J. P. BALL,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
Postoffice and office address: 201-203
Burke Building, Seattle, County of King,
State of Washington.
Sept. 90; Nov. 8, 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-12-01
SUMMONS.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, in and for King
County.
No. $4,000.
Walter Winfield Aver, plaintiff, VS.
Elizabeth Aver, defendant
The State of Washington to the said
Elizabeth Aver, the defendant: You are
hereby summoned to appear within sixty
600 days after the Goth day of Oc-
tober. A. d. 1911. and defend the above
entitled action in the above entitled
court, and answer the complaint of the
plaintiff and serve a copy of the an
swer upon the undersigned attorney for
plaintiff at his office below stated; in
case of your failure so to do. Judgment
will be rendered against you according
to the demand of the complaint which
has been filed with the clerk of said
court.
Said action being for decree of alb
solute divorce on the ground of deser-
ton.
HOWARD O. DURK,
PLAINTIFFS Attorney.
P. o. address, 535 Henry Bldg, Seat
tie, Washington.
Oct. 20, Dec. l. 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-12-01
Norrun AND suaEMoNs.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington for King County.
J. " Brown and Daisy ,a Fern r,r Srcwn;
Company, a corporation, plaintins, vs..
Ben Hazeltlne, Annie D. Hazettine.
his wife. Frances =. Hazeltine, as s
C. B. Hazeltine. deceased. J. Settle.
Louise s. Washburn. r. c. Washburn,
her husband, and all persons unknown
having or claiming an interest or es-
tate in the real property hereinafter
Sescr ssss defendants.
The State of Washington, to the said
Ben Haze1tine,- Annie p. Hazeltine his
wife, Frances L. HaZe1tine as executrix
OF the will and estate of G. B. Hazeltine,
deceased, J.. Settle, Louise 8. Washburn
and r. 6. Washburn her husband, and
to all persons unknown having or claim
ing an interest or estate in the properly
hereinafter described, and to all persons
claiming in any manner under, py,
PENDANTS: You and each of you are
hereby notified and summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date OF the
first publication OF this summ non oo so5
day of Sept. 1911, and defend the above
entitled action In the above EMITTED
court and answer the complaint OF the
p1alnt 5on a1 The unersisDed attorney for
plaintiffs, at his office below stated;
and In case of your failure SO TO 90,
judgment will be rendered against you
ana each of you including said persons
unknown and ali claimants, according
to the demands of the complaint, which
has been filed with the clerk OF said
and rendered, setting forth the specific
portions of the South West Quarter lA}
Of the South East Quarter (Ae Of Sec
ty1 Five f25) North of Range Four "a
East of the w. NJ in King County.
washington, found and decreed to be
the sole property of the plaintiff as
prayed and granting the relief prayed
which is the object of this action, and
for costs.
Attorney for Plaintiffs.
1924 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash.
Sept. %: Nov. 8, 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-12-01

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington for King County.
Geo. w. Farlin, plaintiff, VS.. A. B.
Jennings, and all persons unknown,
if any, having or claiming an interest
in and to the hereinafter described
real property, defendants. Notice and
Summons.
State of Washington: To the above
defendants and each of them:
You and each of you, as owners,
estate in and to the hereinafter de-
scribed real property, are hereby noti-
fed that the above named plaintiff is
the holder of one certain delinquent
tax certificate issued by the Treasurer
of King County, State of Washington.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-12-01

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington for King County.
George w. Farlin, plaintiff, VS.. Jack
son Realty Company, and all persons
unknown, if any, having or claiming
an interest in and to the hereinafter
described real property, defendants.
Notice and Summons.
State of Washington: To the above
defendants and each of them:
You and each of you, as owners,
claimants or holders Of an interest or
estate in and to the hereinafter de-
scribed real property, are hereby noti-
fed that the above named plaintiff is
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-12-01

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King Coun-
ty. Summons for Publication.
Jennie Smith, plaintiff, VS.. George Smith,
defendant.-No. -
The State of Washington to the said
George Smith, defendant
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date OF the
first publication of this summons, to-
wit: within sixty. days after the 6tL
day Of October, 1911, and defend the
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-12-01
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King

County.
Stewart & Holmes Drug Co, "a cor
poration, Plaintiff, VS.. J. G. Ross, De-
PENDANT. Summons for Publication
No. 83,288.
The State of Washington to the said
J. G. Ross, defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication of this summons, to-
wit: Within sixty days after the 18th
day of October 1911, and defend the
above entitled action in the above en-
titled court, and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff, and serve copy Of
your answer upon the undersigned at
torney for plaintiff at his office below
stated; and in case Of your failure so
to do, judgment will be rendered against
you according to the demand of the
complaint, which has been filed with
the clerk of said court. The object of
the above entitled action is to obtain
judgment against you for the sum of
Two Hundred and Twenty-eight Dol
lars ($228.00) with interest besides
costs of suit and to reach by garnish-
ment certain personal property and
funds belonging to you in the hands of
j. w. Reed.
LEOPOLD A. STERN,
Plaintiffs Attorney.
P. o. Address, 705 Lowman Building,
Seattle, King County, Washington.
Date of first publication Nov rs.
1911
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-12-01

m THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
state of Washington for King County.
Geo. w. Farlin,~ plaintiff, vs.. A. B.
Jennings, and all persons unknown,
If any, having or claiming an interest
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-12-01

Attorney for Plaintiffs.
1924 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash.
Sept. %; Nov. 8, 1911.
Graham guardian., 1911-12-29

was followed by the finding OF the
body, in deserted part of the town.
OF Thomas Collins, a prominent citi.
zen Of Old Bridge. who had made the
statement that he would spend every
cent he possessed to bring the muir.
derer to justice.
In the meantime the ipsurance com.
panies, the county board of freehold.
ers and the townspeople had detec.
tives working. So battling was the Sc
ries Of crimes that two well.known
detective agencies gave up the work
1t was private detective, employed
by an insurance company, that finally
placed the blame at the door of the
Baptist church elder The Appleby
family is one Of the best known in
New Jersey.
Then several attempts were made
to burn the home of w. r. Rivers.
Another resident of Old Bridge, who
was finally forced to leave town be-
cause Of the number of times his
place of business was destroyed by
fire, was Charles Hodopp. a butcher.
After his third store had been de-
stroyed by fire he moved to Newark.
Graham guardian., 1911-12-29
Aged Churchman Charged With Arson

kI EWARK, N. J.--Ellis Appleby. Of
~ Old Bridge, N. j., go years old,
deacon in the Baptist church, wealthy
and well known, was recently ar
rested on a charge of arson Action
comes after an inquiry Of six years,
in which the whole county Of Middle
sex has been terrorized by incendiary
fires. During the reign Of terror muir
der followed arson. The specific &C.
cusation is made by an insurance COM
pany in the case of the burning Of
the home of Mrs. Jessie Brown on
August 81. In six years the residents
OF Old Bridge have been strangely
murdered and more than dozen fires
occurred.
Six years ago Mrs. Jane Wright. an
octogenarian. was found dead in bed
one morning in her house, where she
lived alone, across from the Baptist
church Of which Appleby is one of
the elders. Every effort was made by
the authorities to find the murderer.
but the case bafled the cleverest de-
tectives. One Of those who threat
ened to bring the murderer to Justice
was George Whiteman Jr., son Of the
keeper of the Rooster Inn. two miles
from Old Bridge. A few days later
young Whiteman and his father were
murdered in the inn, both being shot.
A few weeks later a laborer who
was thought to have some knowledge
of the crime was found murdered in
the road on the outskirts Of Old,
Bridge. The murder of the laborer
Graham guardian., 1911-12-29
Plan 1OO-Story Building for Gotham

the limit in height had been reached.
That structure OF 40 stories. towers
700 feet above the ground. But at the
present time 55-story building Is In
course Of construction which. when
completed. will be 750 feet high. So
1t will be seen that the l00-story
building. like the 100-foot boat. is
really not dream but actually in
sight as a practical realization.
According to Mr.. Mortimer, the erec.
tion of a 100.story building will not
offer any more serious engineering
problems than are to be found In put
ting up one of As or so stories. The
foundations will not have to be any
deeper. for the solid rock below the
surface of Manhattan would support
500-story building II it were possi-
BILE to build one.
The building. Of course, will be OF
steel construction. more than 10000
tons being required, not to mention
22,500,000 common brick, 2.700.00O
face brick. 10000 cubic feet OF Indiana
limestone, 5000 cubic feet Of granite
and 5000 tons OF ornamental terra
Gotta. The outer materials are In
equally stupendous quantities. For In
stance, 1,350,000 square feet of parti'
tion tile will be needed, 100000 feet
of pine boards for floor covering, $500
windows, $4,000 square feet Of glass
and $4,000 pounds Of window
weights. Ninety elevators will be
housed In II.
Graham guardian., 1911-12-29
Cowboy Shopper Is One Real Spender

as cheap sport. piker. a T-wad,
who didn't know how to turn good
money loose when he had it. For
your cowboy dude is the original
turner-loose Of money when It comes
to buying adornments. He will spend
$40 for pair Of boots. $40 for pair
of gloves. $50 for hat and SIS for a
saddle without turning hair.
Through all the lonesome days and
nights when he is "out on the range"
he is thinking Of the trip he will take
to Kansas City the first time be gets
chance. And when finally he does
drift into town. he goes right over
to Blanks and buys his outfit before
he starts to take in the town, sample
the brands Of wet goods or hunt up
poker game.
And when he gets back on his ma
tive heath In full regalia, his lusty
voice, as he drives his calico pony at
short lope." roaring out with some
such rollicking refrain as,
O, bury me not on the lone pe-rairie,
Where the wild coyote howls DER
me-
But lay me to sleep In the little
churchyard,
In grave that's six by three.
Who can say that he is less fop
than the city chap in full dress who
stares haughtily out of his clubroom
window and whistles "Alexander's
Ragtims Band?"
Graham guardian., 1911-12-29
|THEs Sc ERE
IEAsTeRN GUYS
{ DoNT KNOW
WHAT A REAL
LIVE DANNY
,A0oKs LAKE.

Y ANSAS CITY. Mo.-When the fop
n Of the Bar-Circle-X and the Bar
Y ranches comes up to the city to
buy his winter wardrobe. about the
same time his more effete brother, the
fop of the towns. goes to st. Louis.
Chicago or New York to lay in his
winter wardrobe. 80 there is little
chance Of them meeting and compar-
ing notes. With his supercilious air.
the effete one might look in sccrn
upon his sun-tanned confrere. while
the bronco-bustin' dude OF the south.
west undoubtedly would break into a
guffaw II he saw the other in q Prince
Albert coat and top hat So perhaps
II is well that each makes his annual
eastern migration about the same
time of the year. For the difference
between them. at bottom. is very
small. after ell.
When the one comes back with his
new fall suit and his fuzzy hat and
his spats and gloves and all the rest
OF 1t he probably will think he has
been something of npender. He
probably would be surprised to know
that the other would look upon him
Graham guardian., 1911-12-29
Control Of Senate.

The appointment of Obadiah Gard.
ner, Democrat. as mepber of the ma.
tional senate from Maine. increases
the democratic vote in that body to
AZ. with reduction of the Republican
membership to 40,
During the special session, the tar.
iff bills were passed. as the result Of
affiliation of progressive" Republic.
ans with the Democrats AT least ten
such Republicans are counted on to
cooperate with Democrats on tariff
legislation In the coming regular ses.
sion.
If only four of those gentlemen were
to continue to act with the Democrats,
the old-time stand-pat element Of the
Republicans would be in a minority.
With the house SO assuredly Dem
ocratic and conditions described ex-
listing in the upper branch, 1t remains
simply for the Democrats to hold to-
gether In favor Of broad. sound prin.
ciples of tariff legislation to make the
coming session memorable in the rec.
ords of political reform and increase
the proportions of Democratic sue
cess to be attained in the national
election.
Graham guardian., 1911-12-29
Defenders Of Tariff Of 1909.

The tariff act Of 1909 has been in
vestigated by several competent and
disinterested persons. The results of
their Investigations may be found in
Miss Tarbelrs Tariff in Our Own
Times" in Professor Taussig's Tar
III History Of the United States" in
Professor Coman's Industrial History
of the United States" and IN various
magazine article of Importance. In
cluding Prof. Willis articles in the
Journal Of Political Economy. and an
exceptionally thorough study In the
Review OF Reviews.
All Of these investigators agree that
the revision was farcical.
The only defenses OF the act hare
come from such sources as members
of the ways and means committee and
the wool trust. which prints an
elaborate pun of schedule X In the
current issue OF the Outlook--as an
advertisement
Graham guardian., 1911-12-29
MAKES RATHER A BAD START.
No Doubt Boy Meant Well, but HIs In
ltIal Efforts at Keeping Diary
Are impressive.

This is my first dry so don't mind
the spellin. / wus'nt goin to right It
till little while longer. only, this
morning was rainy and my ma sed.
William, why don't you begin your
dry, this will be good day to be-
gin, and 1t will keep you out Of mis-
chif?" sed alright, SO went up
stairs and got my big brother Johns
stamp album and began pulling out
the stamps SOS could right. John
says his stamps are worth a lot OF
money but / don't believe 1t cause
when he wanted to buy football the
other day why didn't he sell EN- and
get the money. Anyhow don't want
him to catch me as / have started
righting In 1t. The first thing In O
dry is the date SO will now right 1t.
October 26. 1911--When began this
dry forgot to tell you that ] bor-
rowed my sisters pink hair-ribbon to
hold the leaves to-gther more, and.
when big brother John came home !
heard him yell awful when he couldn't
find his album so Iran upstairs to the
attic behind a big trunk where he
cant find me. l just now heard my
sister come In and I'm so scared !
darst not 60 down stairs now and I'm
afraid to right anymore SO I'll have
to creep in the trunk and stay till he
goes. I'll continu my dry to-morrer,
Newark IN. j. Star.