Bismarck daily tribune. [volume] (Bismarck, Dakota [N.D.]) 1881-1916, 1911-05-03

Mr. Snker his address Saturday took
criticize Senator ookway for his decision this
and leaving this court before the made He cited
decision which held that
charge by Judge to the jury that they attention. to the
remarks of counsel reversible and then he said that Hookway
that and he when he LETT here
before the made that he doing that which the law Of
this state and the supreme court of this state condemned
Now wish they would stand the er Senator Hook
way premature io then Cowan would premature
many they had
been argued he had had the light that counsel could throw
Them bm thew saw when Cwan wait, for arguments he is mncachbe
When Hookway did for he is likewise mpcachabe
Which which They both Judges Mr. Snkler
the he talking be forgot for
the time being he speaking that he
speaking composed who capable of nalyz
beginning have
of thing
constitute this able what
that evidence showed as was Mr. E. snker and where when tho
committee adopted of this kind and be
the practice of the state doubt that hut each and
in this Senate has studied evidence tell what and
what leads TO- and could tell at the close just as wen
perhaps better who the the fight
following standing these
something
have but the chances simply
possibly brought would be the different members
of could all the matter with clear
idea than d.
a against Nelson specification
is attorney
George A. typographical
Berger
apher made the made an error there no such
R. This the Blank against
the start First
Nelson and then
is the record Zeger Nelson seems that all along the
combined the defendant in this suit from
the accused absolutely
make because in such that mpos
sbe tell who interested and hardly where came FROM
Simpson, What the testified?
Mr. Tracy Bangs: think the
there against by the
unable tell which
this was
specification Company against
decided in May 1909
Ed Flynn and Fred j.
that the according testimony
1908 that briefs fled in August 1905
transmitted Cowan nothing
dated IT, 1907 think there
before hawhen Flynn writes and asks to have
submitted to him.
and Flynn went before Cowan and told him
they going argued
submitted It, Now that merely
amounts you the
up submit him. then de-
How times have who have been around
and listened to trials and when finished the
arguments and ninety nine times
will honor would like to
and brief Then starts to drag
would prefer have submitted to him
when tried because then is fresh his mind and ne can de-
this morning. almost
invariably that the attorneys want the time
specification 49, Cline against Duffy that specification has been
stricken out
Bank Of Crazy against Ebert Maxwell specification 49, Now
the attorneys and Mr. Serum
nteect little into this by saying that he had
decision Cowan had told him
they that they owed bis
client seumgad wanted him give
him order Judgment safd
he hasn't spoken Cowan about that
in this and he that Mr.
plaintiff he and serumgad for
taken nothing further
neither befed argued No had asked for
tells be briefed and argued but
In other words when that finished so far as
McClory Cuhbert who
the for the defendant parties
ed and argued but that brief ever filed
made charged here Of
that John F. Cowan should mpeach
ed though 1t is
through these but they have been
with them though
practical H.
though of the distinguished members OF
the bench believe start and not
all to sleep in
that wouldn't be marker compared
whit the these