The Sentinel=record., 1911-07-28

ious measures on the free list bI7l as amendments or to have the house take up the schedules as independ- ent bills.
 The democratic senators are neith- CT so unanimous or so enthusiastic as the insurgents for continued re- vision. They say that much VIII depend upon the presidents attitude. It has been suggested that after lthe disposition in conference of the wool, cotton and free list bills there should be a recess of a month or six weeks to permit the ways and means committee to proceed with it's work.
 The results in the senate came with surprising quickness. Thorough organization Of the combined forces was apparent from the start. Sena- tor La Follette's woolen bill. offer ed at first as an amendment to the Underwood bill, received but If votes those of the insurgent republicans.
 The Underwood bill itself was vot- ed down with equal facility, only the democrats and Senator Brow of Ne- b5aFka suppoEing it, Then came Senator La Follettes motion to re- consider the vote. Democrats hav- ing secured their desired record vote on the Undergi1od bill, joined him in the vote to reconsider.
 The Underwood bill was then brought back to life and Senator La Toilette offered the compromise bill that had beer agreed on. It was at tached to the Underwood measure as a substitute fir the terms of that bill and passed by vote of 4S to 32, all without a hitch or tumble. The democrats voted solidly. The lost three northwestern republicans, Senator Borah of Idaho, Senators Jones of Washington and Dixon of Montana, but they gained Ssnato- McCun5er of N0rta Dakota.
 T weu l nc. agree to the bill as 1t pasted tic senate,' sail MT. Un. derwpod. snd 1 cont tnlli. ne house would agree to 1t. But l hope to see some sort of a wool bill passed. I would not stand out for the bill ua- til 1t had passed the house, but would be willing to make some com promise ana believe the house feels lhe same way.v
 MT Tnderwooa expressed she opin- ion t1st the wool bill would not ne- sessary delay adjournment later thaa IS at present contemplated shortly liter the vote on statehood on Au- gust z. as the conferees would get .ogether, he believed, in a few days.
 The important features of the new La Foilete bill which the senate pass sd this afterno0-, compared with the present law and the Underwood house bill, are shown in the follow ng:
 Raw wool, first class--wool on skins, present. law, 5771 per cent ad vaiorem, Underwood % per cent; La Toilette, 30 per cent.
 Wool, not on skins, present law 47.24 per cent; Underwood 20 per cent; La Toilette 55 per cent.
 Raw wool, second class, present 4.9S per cent; Underwood 20 per cent La Toilette 10 per cent.
 Top waste. present 9O.S per cent. Underwood 20 per cent; La Toilette 25 per cent.
 Shoddy nolls, etc, present, fl per ees5; Underwood 20 per cent; La Toilette 25 per cent.
 Woolen rags, mungo. etc., present 94 40 per cent; Underwood, 20 per cent; La Toilette % per cent.
 Combed tops, present Iii per cent. Underwood 25 per cent; La Toilette It per cent.
 Yarns present 76. 6S per cent. un- derwood 30 per cent; La Toilette 45 per cent.
 Blankets and fIannels, present 95. 42 per cent; Underwood 80 per cent; La Toilette 55 per cent.
 Clothes, dress goods fabrics and woolen cloth. present 96.7 per cent; Underwood 45 per cent; La Toilette 55 per cent.
 Carpets present 50 per cent; Un- Ederwood 25 per cent; La Toilette 35 lper cent.
 Mats and rugs, present 62.95 per cent; Underwood 50 per cent; La Toilette 35 per cent.
 ---------------------
 RULE OF REASON"