The Washington herald., 1911-10-28
Criminal Court No. L.
Iusr1Cn ANDERSON

JUSTICE ANDERSON.
No. A6S. United States Benjamin HaiSlip and
Thomas W. Sauer, houSebgeaking and larceny; con
tinued.
No. 2Ts5. United States vs. Henry Carter, non
support; plea not guilty.
No. 249s United States ". Howard Higbee en-.
No A7A United States n. Martin Hey. as
Saut with dangerous weapon: defendants surety
called bond forfeited and bench warrant ordered Is
sued
No. z752 United States vs. Thomas Butler same
sentenced to penitentisry for year and one day
No G76. United States Joseph Green; same
sentenced TO Jail for EI months and placed on pro
baton.
No. G4s5. United States vs. John Pieper, falls
pretenses; plea not guilty.
No Z7O5 United States rs William Finks, rob
berry; sentenced to penitentiary for two years.
No A7n. United States John Jones, same
same.
No Z7E United States Vs. Frank Welcome. same
motion for new trial oTerruled.
No. E63 United States Va Lottie Burke and
Lena sprEES. robbery and attempted robbery; Burke
sentenced to penitentilIy for five years and SprEE
sentenced to penitentiary for two years
No. A62 United States w Victoria Lee arson
renanded for inquiry to sanity
No. 25s6. United States vs.. Thomas Wynn and
Owen Brenner. forgery, utterinE. and conspiracy
demurrer argued and submitted
Assignments for Monday, October %:
United States James A. CowhiK
United States TS. John Richardson.
United States vs.. Mary Marshall and Amos Dor
United States vs.. Arthur Holmes
Criminal Court No. 2.
JUSTICE BARNARD
No. HT4. United States vs. Charles Rigs: As
sanlt with dangerous weapon sentenced 70 peniten-
tiary for five years.
No. z67O. United States vs. John Jones; house
breaking and larceny; same.
No. 1856. United States vs. Robert Cameron;
eInbezZlement; nolle prose. ordered.
No. 2S75e United States vs. Same; false pre-
lenses sentenced TO penitentiary for three years
No. 5SSS. HaZen vs. Hazard; Judgment Under
seTenty-third rule. Attorneys, Barnard & johnson
Nelson Wilson.
No. s3lg. Goldman VS.. Lowe: security 70. costs
ordered. Attorneys II. W. Wheatlsy-Carter 4
No. $3.50. Empire State Surety Company vs.
Warren; dismissed under twenty-hrst rule. Attor-
neys Hufty Hufty-F. B. Rhodes
No. S573l. Adams Tackelman motion TO dismiss
oTerruled Attorneys, A. L. Newmyer-RIlStOn. Sid
donS & Richardson.
No. 5oS5l. Moses Sons vs. Hayes; motion for
Judgment under serenty-third rIl. denied Attor-
neys Webster BsllinGeI-L H. David
No. $3.50 Conger Bros rs. Same; same. Attor-
neyS same.
No. sac2. Burrh & Kleps vs.. Smith: motion :ur
new trial orerruled; APPEAL noted Attorneys, s.
V. Hayden-M. T. ClinkScalcs
No. 6lSa. Dupont Garage Company vs.. Dixon
motion for new trial OTerrIled- Attorneys. J. A.
Hicks and E. 8. Baiey-R. S. Hume.
No. 5000. Howell Katzen: motion TO suppress
depOsitiOns oEerruled- &C. Attorneys, H. W.
Wheatley-Mark Stearmau.
No. $3.50. Lyon Smith; motion for new trial
filed AttOrneys John Rdout-F. c. Handy.
Assignments for October 30:
Certiorari:
No. 2. Federal Loan and Investment Company
Wilson et al. Attorneys. Dickey-Gies
No. 3. Pitner Gasoline Lighting Company vs.
Miller ct al Attorneys. Happier & Merillat
No. g Baldwin White Oak Coal Company.
Attorneys, Mather-Graf.
No 20 LipScornb & Co. WagstAh White.
Attorneys, Lip-comb- Sheehy Hogan.
No 81 Turner rs. Sugar. Attorneys, Lubey 4
Welsh irsChman.
Appeals:
No. 81. PoseJ ". Posey. Attorneys, Dan. Peyser
& TaylOr-Niiller.
No g. Van Zandt vs.. Coblsntz. Attorney.
Fowler.
No g. Yohe vs. Oliver Attorneys, o'Bren-
Williamson & Darlington.
NJ. 81 Totten McHenry Bros. Attorney.
Smith
No D Washington Post Company Lincoln
Attorneys, Leckie, Fulton & Cox and shcrter-
Colbert.