New-York tribune., 1911-03-26
mrs. EDDY DECEIVED"
Glover Files Additional Bill in
Equity Against Church Trustees.
DIRECTORS ALSO ACCUSED
Son Says He Was Estranged
from Mother Through Their
Vaccinations.

UxdCUludIIOuO'
Concord. X H.. March 25.-An additional
bill in equity, filed to-day in the Superior
Court for Merrimack County In behalf of
George ". Glover, OF Lead, 5. D., against
tho trustees Of the First Church Of Christ
Scientist, In Boston, makes the direct al
legation that Mary Baker Eddy. founder
Of the Christian Science Church. was "sys
temsticslly deceived and led to bedueafh
nearly the whole Of her property 70 said
church, IN ignorance of the fact that 50
great beauest was forbidden by the lsrs
Of both New Hampshire and Masss-
chusetts"
II is further alleged that the plaintiff In
the case now before the courts. George " o.
Glover, was also deceived. and entered
into an agreement not 10 contest the Viii
of his mother. the Rev Mary Baker g. Eddy.
without suspecting that an Illegal dlsposl.
ton of the property vas in contemplation
II is stated that he agreed not 10 question
any lawful bequests that his mother might
make, but II is further declared that ne
would never have agreed 10 an Illegal dis
tribution Of the property, and did not so
egree. Further. the bill declares that the
defendants well knew that Mr. Glover
would not have entered into an agreement
which would bind him 70 acquiesce In an
eva sion Of the law, and he was, therefore,
carefully kept from any knowledge ~ the
purposes Of the defendants.
Another allegation is that the plaintiff
was estranged from his mother through the
"machinations Of the directors Of the First
Church Of Christ. Scientist, her mind haV-
ing been poisoned against him by false
statements II is also charged that he was
under the influence Of malicious animal
ma gnetism" which has so many times been
mentioned in the Eddy suits. The tunda-
mentals OF the belief m malicious animal
magnetism" are set forth, and II IS de-
clared that Christian science practitioners
ale allowed 70 use the same me'nods IN
combating those who are addicted 10 TINS
evil practice
mot a Charitable Body
The bill sets forth the method NJ the gov
ernment of the First Church of Christ
Scientist. sketches ts history and also
the history of the famous next friends
suit Of 1907 and attacks the denomination
As not being a charita ble body. The bill
in equity Is signed for George W Glover
by his attorney. William f. Chandler
All the sverm.nts Of the original petition
as 70 the incompetency o, Mrs. Eddy 70 ex-
erc.se unbiased judgment in the manage
ment of her affairs are reafirmed IN tho
amended petition In regard 70 tn. discon-
tinuance Of the next friend" suit the bill
SAYS
The plaintiff further says that the
MANNED family arrangement vas utterly
null and void against him because It was
procured from him by the defendants or
the First Church Of christ. Scientist, in
Boston and their representatives, through
wilful concealment and deceit. by means OF
which they kept the plaintiff In complete
a donation Of g, ,rO6.ooO, with full knowledge
on their part that under the laws Of Mas
sachusetts that Church couia !, on only taHe
and under the laws Of New Hampshire
could only take property which would pro
duce 5000 a year.
When the arrangement was approaching
completion they refused 10 allow the plain
tif's counsel TO see his mother, fearing
that upon an interview the situation might
be changed and the laws obeyed.
In pursuance Of their plan of concealment
sci 10 obtain acknowledgements agreements,
releases quit claims and covenants for fur
ther assurance in every possible form. The
plaintiff knew that he had no then exist
ing title or estate in his mothers prop
ertv: that he could only agree that she
might make a lawful deed or will of such
as she might possess after an arrangement
with her sons. and he could not imagine
any possible reason why such varied stpu-
lations should be required. but, knowing
the legal effect Of his agreement could only
he that she might make q lawful disposi-
tion away from him Of the rest of her
property. he saw no harm therein and ig
norantlv bur readily signed the papers. He
now secs their purpose and charges that
thew we're intended as part of plan Of
conceament and deception.
The closing paragraph Of the petition
says:
The plaintiff further complaining against
said defendants says that he is advised ny
his counsel that the devises and bedueSts
contained IN the fourth. sixth and eighth
items of the will OF said Mary Baker q.
Eddy are for purposes which are contrary
10 the public policy of this state. as estab-
lished bv its laws. in that said purposes II
efectuated are destructive of the policy
of said state as TO hygiene. sanitation. med
icine and surgery. and are also destructive