The Washington herald., 1911-02-21

and PittsbIrg Railway Company; motion to advance
granted, ard assigned for argument Monday
April ) next.
No. So. Herbert 5. Hadley ct al. petitioners
VS.. Arthur G. Huidekopsr; motion to advance
granted and cause assigned for argument Tues
day. October 10 next, after the already
signed for that day.
No. ~. Webster B. Lawrence &c. appellant
vs. The southern Pacific Company ct al. motion 10
advance denied but cause will be taken on sub
mission on printed briefs if all parties so ad-
vsed.
No 7S4 The Fair. appellant. vs. KohIer Die and
Speciality Company. motion to advance denied
No 81 Edmund s. Nash ct al. petitioners,
The United States petition for a wit Of certiorad
to the United States Circuit Court Of Appeals
Tor the Fifth circuit granted.
No. So DOwasiac Manufacturing Company. pctt
TONER n vs. Minnesota MOIiss Plow Company ct al;
No. SIG. Dowagiac Manufacturing Company. peti-
uoncr, vs. Ernest f. smith Ct al: petition for
Writs Of certiOrd-i 10 the United States Circuit
Court Of Appeals for The Eighth circuit granted.
No. S6. Sanitary street Flushing Machine Com
ISlny, pettloner, IS st Louis street Flushing Ma
chine Comlany ct al; petitiOn for writ of Ger
tIo'ari to the United States Circuit Court of Ap-
peaL5 for the Eighth ciruit denied.
No. So. Whitney elevator and Warehouse Com
pGny. petitioner. Belle y. Whitney; petition for
a writ o! ccrticra1 to the United States Circuit
Court Of Appeals for the Second circuit denied.
No. so. The Schmerrz Wire Glass Company ct
al. petitioners, vs. Highland Glass Company; Re
ution for wrt Of csrtioran to the United States
Circuit Of Appeals for the Third circuit denied.
No. 81 Frank J.. Neail trustee. peti
toner, VS.. Maryland Dredging and Contracting Com
Iany ct al: petition for writ Of certiOrai to the
United States Circuit Court Of Appeals for the Sec
ond circuit denied.
Charles r. Flint petition for wit of certiorari to
the United States CirIi; Court # Appeals for the
Fourth circuit denied.
No. 81 The Empire Timber Company. petitioner.
" The WOO1Eins Timber Company: petition for a
writ Of ccrtlIrar to the UDitsd States Circuit Court
OF Appeals for The Sec nd circuit denied
No l%. Buck Strrc and Range Company. ap-
peilant. vs. The American Federation Of LahOr ct
al: and
No. 2ai The American Federation Of Labor ct
al, appellants The Bucks Stove and Rargr
C"mIaJ; appeals run the Court u Appeals of the
District a COmmbia. Per C1riam: When these
cases were reached for hearing and after the ar7I-
ment had materially progressed. It developed from
Statements made by cIunSl for both PARTIES that the
CaSs had bCOme pUrsly because Of the settle
ment bctwc2n the parties # every material cDntrD-
VCrSy which the reCDrd pies, utsd. On the disclosure
~ this situation further argument dispensed
with; and for the reason which led to that ac-
tlc"1 that Is. have said that the controversies
bctWeen .he PARTIES had bccJme in all respects moot
the 1pI eais must h. dismissed EichardSCn Nc
Chesncy. Us l. S. 4S. l8- and cases cited. Ap-
lHal5 dismissed without costs TO either party.
No. 2l6 Clarence H. Werner et al plaintiffs in !
error. Is. Tho Denver Union Water Company ct al
IN error TO the Sup7rme Court Of the State Of Colo
rado Per cIram Writ Of error dismissed for want
Of jurisdiction. Farrell OBrien. 1873 [. s.. 100;
Waters Pitrcr Oil Company vs.. State Of Texas, 2l2
L s. liz; King West Virginia H6 T. s. y; |
Griffith Connecticut 2Is L. : S3
No ~. Cross Lake Shooting and Fishing Club. |
Tialnuh IN error. the State of louisiana mo
ton tn dismiss or affirm submitted by Mr.. r g. !
Pleasant. Mr.. Walter GuiOn, and Mr.. W. P Hail. |
for the defendant in support Of the untion
and by Mr.. Edgar H. Farrar for the plaintiff in |
opposition thereto.
No SIS. Christopher Strashein. sheriff. &c. ap |
pcllant Milton Daily: suggestion Of di1niuution |
and motion to amend record instanter submitted by
Mr.. Franz G. Kuhn for the appellant: motion TO |
advance submitted by Mr.. Franz g. Kuhn for the |
appellant roth motions opposed by Mr.. William s |
Forrest for appellee.
No $50. The Atlantic City Railroad Cnnrany |
petitioner " Mary :. C1eEg. administratrx. &c. 81;
Intiton for writ Of orrtiorar to the United States
ClrCInt Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit sub
mitted BY Mr. Wade II. Ellis in behalf Of Mr. c. L. |
Cole for the petitioner. and by Mr.. W. Holt Apgar
for the respondent.
No: sl3 Charles c, Birmingham ct al. appellants
rs. Charles NJ. CrIse motion TO advance submitted |
by Mr. A Il. Cushman in behalf Of Counsel
No SB Patrick h. Connolly, petitioner
Francis E. BoucS. administrator. &c. ct al: prti-
bon for a writ Of certiorar to the United States
Circuit CoIrt Of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
submitted by Mr.. Hugh Butler for the petitioner.
No So. The American Manufacturing Company.
Nalenti ZukowSki; petition for a
writ O crriorari to the United States CircIit Court
IF Appeals for the Second circuit submitted by Mr.
Thomas +. Magner for the petitioner and By Mr..
Charles Dushkind and Mr.. A. ]. Rose for the
respondent.
No. 65i Robert Gilland. plaintiff in error. vs.
he United States motion to advaDce submitted by
Mr.. G. T. Milans in behalf Of counsel.
No. 81 John ]. Sesn0n Company. petitioner vs.
The United States Of America; petition for a writ
4 certorar IN the United States Circuit Court of
Appeals for the Ninth cir1Iit submitted by Mr..
George II. Lamar and Mr.. William H. Gorham for
he petitioner, and by Mr.. Solicitor General Leh-
mann for the respondent.
No. 6ll. ]. NJ. Hebert ct al Appellants vs.. j.
Crawford. trustee ct al. motion TO advance submit
ed By Mr.. A. d. Lipscnmb for the appellants with
n n NJ bpfor
o-morTOW.
No. 9l,. Justo Pue1te y Amsterdam ct al apral-
ants. vs. Felix Puertc ct al appeal from the Sl-
lrome Court of Porto Rico: dncketsd and dismissed
With costs. on --otlon Of Mr. Frederic D. McKenney
or the appellees.
No. $50. A. J. Preston. petitioner. vs.. Sturgis
Milling Company:
70 sei A. ]. Preston petitioner. vs. Chicago. St.
IOuis and New Orleans Railroad Company; and
No. s9S- A ]. Preston. petitioner vs.. T. W. Cal
oWay ct al: petitions for Erits Of csriorari to the
lnited States Circuit Court Of Appeals for the
sixth cirC5Jit submitted by Mr.. Helm Bruce and Mr.
Kennedy Holm for the petitioner. and b Mr.. James
: Farleigh for the respondents in Nos. $50 and S5.
md by Mr.. Edmund F. Trabue for the respondent {
n No. SOL
No. 6. Original The State Of North Carolina.
ompiainant. vs.. The State Of Tennessee; leave
Tanted TO file stipulations 10 continuance and as
o taking evidence on motion Of Mr.. J. c. Mercy
oldS in behalf of counsel, and orders entered in
urdance therewitn.
No. SO. John Hart. petitioner vs. The United t
nitcd States Circuit Co4lr. Of Aupcals for the Sixth
lrc1it submitted by Mr.. Thomas W. FItzsimonS for
he petitioner motion that D titoner he admitted TO
al submitted by Mr.. Thomas W. FTtzsimOnS for the
etinoner. Leave granted to the Solicitor General
D hle opposition on or before Friday next.
No. 4o6. Alexander d. Mcknight plaintiff in er ,
N' vs.. robert I. Hodge. sheriff. &c; motion to
dTanee to he heard with No. is submitted by Mr.
awrence Maxwell for the plaintiff in error here a
J IN support Of the motion. and by Mr.. Elliott for
he defendant in error in No. l56 in opposition a
hereto. 4
No 6e. W H. Byles. plaintiff in error vs. the
tate OF Arkansas: motion to advance to be heard
ith NO. 10 submitted By Mr.. A. c. Lyon for the 1
!alntln IN error herein in support Of the motion
nd oy MT Elliott w. Major for the defendant 4
! error IN No. l56 in oprosition thereto
No HS. The Texas and Pacific Railway COMPANY =
ainnn IN error. Us. Mrs. Mary A. Stevenson ct y
Ii IN error TO the United States Court Of Appeals
r the Fifth circuit; dismissed per stipulation A
No. z The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Com
any. appellant, vs.. Interstate Commerce Commits 6
on; and
No. 49, The United States. plaintiff in error. W. b
a Johnson; passed on account OF sickness Of
'nsei; to be restored to the call under the pro a
olicnor General Lehman for the United States Fl
No Is. Original. Ex parte: In the matter Of
he Eastern Cherokees, petitioner; argued by Mr. Il
'hn Il. D7ish for the petitioner and by Mr..
gorge NJ Anderson for the respondent. l!
No. S2 Northern Pacific Railway Company plain
n in error, Us. Bessie Babcock. admintstrz- a
ix. &c;
No. SO. New York New Haven and Hartford
abroad Company. plaintiff in error, vs. Mary
gnes Walsh. administrative;
No. 90. Mary Agnes Walsh. administrator plain
in error. New York. New Haven and Hart =.
I'd Railroad Company: and 4
No. aS Edgar G. Mo-dou. plaintiff in error. -
he New York. New Haven and Hartford Railroad
'upany; leave granted for three counsel to make g
al argument for the railroad companies on motion
Mr.. c. W. Bum IN that behalf; argument com