Arizona republican., 1911-05-07
SUPREME COURT END
THE MAY MEETING
AN ADJOURNMENT TAKEN TO
NOVEMBER g.
Concerning Beer and Other Extraneous
Matters in Jury Room.

! The supreme court yesterda.- morn
ing disposed of all the business before
it and adjourned until November .. 1t
/ is suspected that the territorial fair
! association i'm order To- avail itself of
/ the congregation of the justices. will
! set the time for the opening of the
/ fair at about that date. II will be- just
/ like the association To- do that In fact.
J regardless of the solemnity of the No
Vember meeting of the court. the asso-
citation i'm all the years agone has ar
ranged matters that the frivolous fair
should be held syncrOnously. But no
doubt, il the supreme court should ar
range its meetings for another date the
time Of the fair. which is after all d
movable festival, would be changed also.
Mos; of the business of the court at
the late meeting consisted i'm the con-
sideration of motions for rehearing and
all but one of them were denied They
were as follows: r. \. Alton against
the board of medical examiners from
this county: notice Of appeal to the
United States supreme court, and
bond fixed at $1,000 This case was an
appeal from the district court affirm
ing the right OF the board 10 revoke the
certificate of DR.. Alton.
The Bank of Arizona. appellant.
against the Thomas Haverty company,
appellee. notice of appeal by the ap-
pellant. bond. $4,000.
Paine. Weber Il Co, appellants
against the copper Belle Mining COM
pany, appellee. notice of appeal; bond,
81 900.
Belle J. Barnes. appellant. against L.
G. Shattuck Mary +. Street and J. l.
3. Alexander, intervenors.
Eva l. Sanford, appellant. against
Santiago Ainsa. administrator of the
estate of Frank Ely. appellee notice Of
appeal. bond. $500.
Edward Zeiger against j. T. Downy
and others.
II. c. Vincent against Allen Smith.
In the case of Henry Kreger against
the Twin Buttes company, Pima coun
". a motion for a rehearing was
granted. \ motion TO affirm was
granted i'm the case of J. r. Head. ap-
pelant. against the Prescott National
bank. appellee. from Yavapai county.
In the case of Ivan Hoefield. plain
tiff in error against the Dero.t Copper
company. defendant in error, Pima
county. the judgment of the lower court
was affirmed.
The judgment Of the lower court was
affirmed i'm the case of Marshal Lew
against the territory. respondent, CO.
chise county The appellant mad been
convicted of a statutory offense against
a young girl and was sentenced To the
penitentiary The appeal was based
upon the affidavit of one Of the jurors
who said that the verdict of guilt had
been arrived at after a discussion in
the jury room. not of the guilt or in
nocence Of the appellant but of the
probability of a roast by the court
i'm the event of a verdict of not guilty.
and he stated that the jury had in mind
the experience of a previous jury which
in another case had disappointed the
court with a verdict of acquittal.
Counter affidavits said that no such
discussion took place in the jury room
and that the first affiant on the first
ballot had voted blank in order To leave
the matter open for consideration and
that on all subsequent ballots he voted
for conviction.
a further ground of appeal vas that