The Redwood gazette. [volume] (Redwood Falls, Minn.) 1873-1940, 1911-10-24
He Would Not Permit a
Piece of Wood In Buildings
Three Stories High.

CoidDilSu u uepdTCIucnl, IOunQe0 some
| what on the lines of the pure food law,
for the purpose of establishing lab
oratories whose business it should be
to test and classify various materials
used throughout the construction OF
freproof buildings in order that the
public may be provided with salts
| factory and sane schedule of standards
! cepted as such by all departments and
authorities in this country, and the
law or laws necessary to make these
conditions possible should be enacted
with the idea constantly in mind that
the present so called fireproof build
ing is such only so far as its exterior
Is concerned and that legislation is
needed and demanded by the public to
insure adequate and proper protection
| to the lives of all persons who may be
called upon to congregate in all build
+, ings of public or semipublic nature
Under the majority of the present
building codes SO called freproof build
ings are substantially fireproof in the
sense that a confagration rarely does
serious injury to the building itself
The flames may rage from room to
room and floor to floor; floors, doors,
partitions and all interior fittings may
char and be consumed; the contents
may be destroyed throughout and some
or many Of the occupants lose their
lives. but the four walls and frame
work, that is, the organic structure of
the building, usually comes through
the conf1agration intact. 1t is the COM
bustiOn Of contents, not damage to the
buildings themselves, that makes fire
losses in the United States SO heavy
in proportion to the amount spent for
new construction. The need, therefore,
is not for ordinance requirements
which will make the buildings more
| effectually 'fireproof,' but enactments
which will protect the inmates and
contents Of buildings by making it
impossible for a fire once started to
course virtually unchecked from room
to room and floor to floor Of a building
whose walls are freproof. In other
words, death proof and confagration
proof construction are necessary re-
quirements for new compulsory legis
lation for 'freproof construction
Future Construction.
Future construction must be so re-
quired that the starting of flames in
one room of a building need not make
imperative the instantaneous exit
therefrom Of all persons employed in
the building, or even on the floor where
the fire starts. Means of safety for
both persons and property must be Sc
cured in the building, and even on the
floor where the fire starts, by making
impossible the instantaneous convert
ing of elevator shafts and stairways
into fues for the flames and by making
impossible the rapid spread of flames
from room to room and floor to floor.
! Nothing could be more dangerous,
more expensive or more unnecessary
than the idea that the safety of work
ers in factory and loft buildings can
best be secured. or can be secured at
all, by providing means of rapid exit to
the street The cost of the kind of fire
escapes and the additional stairways
properly required, as well as the con-
siderable space occupied by such de-
vices, would make them almost pro-
hibitive in expense, even If practicable
or effectual, which they could not be.
"Even if, however, all the occupants
could be got out safely and in time. no
reason appears why the contents
should be left to the mercy of flames
/ coursing from room to room and floor
| to floor until checked by the activities
/ Of the fremen. Both persons and
! property should be afforded protection
in the building by making It's construc-
ton really freproof-that is, death
proof and confagration probationary
combining the flames to limited area
within which to burn themselves out.
consuming only such contents as are
not removed to safety behind doors
and partitions as effectually fire resist
ing as the walls themselves.
/ One Great Lesson.
Zone great lesson which many re-
cent fires have taught is that no build
| ing is more freproof than are its doors
and windows, while the presence OF
wood in trim or casing anywhere less
| ems to that extent the fire resisting
| and fire combining power of the struc-
ture. No matter if the walls are full
| fireproof, doors Of wooden construc-
! ton permit the flames to sweep from
room to room and floor to floor instead
| Of being confined to one room. as IL
4 possible in freproof buildings in real
ity, not fire7roof only In name.
/ How often it is true that hotels.
theaters, apartment buildings and the
like are advertised as 'fireprocf
throughout only to have some fire dis
close that the buildings were veritab!e
fire traps the fireproof construction
1 of the walls. floors and even stairway
making only more perfect fues for the
rapid combustion of tinder-like doors.
/ partitions, window castings, trim and
4 room contents Those who 90 into