Devils Lake weekly world. (Devils Lake, N.D.) 1911-1914, 1911-12-08

dependent companies have 21.Se per
cent. while the American Tobacco com.
pany will have 3s0s per cent. the Lig.
gett & Meyers zoos per cent. the Lori,
lard company 22.s2 per cent and the
Reynolds company 2.66 per cent. The
stock Of the other thirteen companies.
both preferred and common, has been
taken from the defendant American
Tobacco company and has been dis.
tributed among its stockholders. All
covenants restricting competition have
been declared null and further per.
Torrance Of them has been enjoined.
The preferred stock Of the different
companies has now been given voting
power which was denied 1t under the
old organization. The ratio of the pre-
ferred stock to the common was as 7S
to 40. This constitutes very decided
change in the character of the owner.
ship and control of each company.
In the original suit there we're TWEEN.
lynne defendants. who were charged
with being the conspirators through
whom the illegal combination acquired
and exercised it's unla wful dominion.
Under the, decree these defendants viii
hold amounts Of stock in the various
Distribute companies ranging from Al
per cent as maximum to 281a per
cent as a minimum. except in the case
Of one small company. the Porto Rican
Tobacco company. in which they will
bold IS per cent. The twenty-nine In
dividual defendants are enjoiped for
three years from buying any stock ex-
cept from each other. and the group is
thus prevented from extending its con-
troll during that period. All parties to
the suit and the new companies who
are made parties are enjoined perpet-
ually from In any way effecting any
combination between any of the com.
panies In violation of the statute by
way of resumption Of the old trust
Each Of the fourteen companies is en-.
Joined from acquiring stock in any Of
the others. All these companies are
enjoined from having common direc-
tors or officers. or common buying or
selling agents. or common offices. or
sSANA46 AAoACy " Gi1Cu JULIET,
Size Of New Companies
Objection was made by certain in
dependent tobacco companies that this
settlement was unjust because it left
companies with very large capital in
active business and that the settle
ment that would be effective to put all
on an equality would be division of
the capital and plant of the trust into
small fractions in amount more near.
~ equal to that Of each of the indie.
pendent. companies. This contention
results from misunderstanding of
the antitrust law and its purpose. 1t
Is not intended thereby to prevent the
accumulation Of slarge capital in bust
ness enterprises in which such q com.
bination can secure reduced cost of
production. sale and distribution. It
Is directed against such an aggregs-
ton Of capital only when its purpose
Is that Of sitting competition, enhanc.
Ing or controlling prices and establish.
Ing monopoly. If we shall have BY
the decree defeated these purposes
and restored competition between the
large units into which the capital and
plant have been divided we shall have
accomplished the useful purpose of
the statute.
confiscation Not the Purpose Of the
Statute.
1t is not the purpose of the statute
to conf1scate the property and capital
OF the offending trusts. Methods of
punishment by fine or Imprisonment
OF the individual offenders, by fine of
the corporation or by forfeiture Of its
goods in transportation are provided,
but the proceeding in equity is a spe.
ci6c remedy to stop the operation of
the trust by injunction and prevent
the future use Of the plant and capital
In violation of the statute.
Effectiveness Of Decree.
! venture to say that not in the his
tory Of American law has a decree
more effective for such a purpose been
entered by court than that against
the tobacco trust As Circuit Judge
Noyes said in his Judgment approving
the decree:
"The extent to which it has been
necessary to tear apart this combina
don and force it into new forms with
the attendant burdens ought to demon
strate that the federal antitrust statute
II drastic statute which accomplishes
effective results, which so long as II
stands on the statute books must be
obeyed and which cannot be dlsobey-
cd without mourning farreaching pen
aides. And, on the other hand, the
successful reconstruction Of this or.
ganization should teach that the effect
Of enforcing this statute IL not to de
stroy, but to reconstruct; not to de
molish, but to recreate in accordance
with the conditions which the congress
has declared shall exist among the
people Of the United States"
Common Stock Ownership.
1t has been assumed that the pree
ent pro rata and common ownership ir
Ill these companies by former stock
holders Of the trust would insure q
continuance Of the same old single con-
troll Of all the companies into which
the trust has by decree been disinte-
grated. This is erroneous and Is based
upon the assumed ineficacy and innoc.
uousness Of judicial injunctions. The
companies are enjoined from co-opera
ton or combination; they have differ
ent managers, directors. purchasing
and sales agents. II all or many of
the numerous Stockholders, reaching
into the thousands. attempt to secure
concerted action Of the companies with