Charlevoix county herald., 1911-09-09
RHIHV N>KEHE GASOLnE ELyGcl>E mrs
IZE WIOITH

are not engaged in the actual ting of the soil rs
sole means Of livelihood.
The evidences of energy, ambition and prosper
ity which calculated to impress with their
full force only the person who returns to a region
after absence of a score Of years or de9ade
are to be found in various spheres. They are
most noticeable perhaps in the institutions and
facilities which have to do with bread winning
occupations, the increased size and improved con-
dition of farm buildings, the betterment of farm
implements and machinery, the upkeep of the
fences and the satisfactory status Of the
roads over which the farmer haus his produce to
market. 1t is safe to say however, that in no
division OF farm life has the twentieth century dis
closed new possibilities to the extent that such
expansion has been manifested in the architecture
and construction of barns and stables.
The barn has always been most important as
set of the farmer stock raiser Society folk
ignorant of the relative importance of things on a
farm, have been wont to criticize many farmer
because he expended far more money on his barn
than he did upon his residence. From the stand
point of the farmer however, there has always
been ample justification for such a course.
barn represents an important business essential a
source of livelihood whereas a dwelling is in con-
siderable measure if not luxury at least
vehicle Of comfort. Accordingly the farmer if he
has the thrift and foresight and judgment for
which his class are proverbial, is apt to argue,
when setting up for himself, that it IS the part of
wisdom to procure the best possible facilities in
the form OF shelter for his crops and stock and
to bide his time in indulging the longing for fine
house And, be 1t added the average rural house
wife, particularly If she raised farm, has
readily concurred with her husbands view to
the wisdom of thus attending to business first
and pleasure afterward.
Gradually it has about, however that in
the most newy-developed sections of
the country is there noticeable that old disparity
between the appearance of the Farm home and it's
anxn hnrV Thn itu hat has
come to the American farmer in later years has
been mainly responsible. With an opportunity to
derive something like his proper share Of the
profits Of his vocation he has "spruced up things
generally around the old homestead. Like as not
he has invested in an automobile and a high
priced graphophone player piano. but whether
not he has gone to the limit Of luxuries in that
direction he Is pretty certain to have made the
farm home worthy of his family and of his pros
porous condition-ether enargng rebuilding
the old house else putting up new house that
is modern in every respect
But while these other adjuncts have been catch
ing up with the farm barn it must not be sup
posed that the barn Itself has been standing still
in the march OF progress, If we may express 1t
that way. 1t is not much that the presentday
barn or stable is larger than its predecessor of
decade ago-eXcept, of course, in the of large
estates or bonanza farms. On the contrary there
seems to be some tendency to reduce the size of
such buildings. This tendency, which is not yet
by any means universal Is explained by various
circumstances. For one thing 1t has become the
fashion to provide various separate storage struc
lures and outbuildings which take of some
of the farm yield for which space had formerly to
be provided in the barn. Then, too, the automo.
bes of the upto-date farmer of today take up less
space than did the various carriages buggies, light
wagons and carriage horses Of the farmer In pro-
portionately easy circumstances some years ago.
But II country barns have not necessarily been
following tho example of city skyscrapers in grow