Bismarck daily tribune. [volume] (Bismarck, Dakota [N.D.]) 1881-1916, 1911-04-19

far as not
this have their oeen
puppets pigeons faction anyone
earth They have attempted IN ca
dned to heated
respondent and his coun
appeared in this that has Us
more heated we again
human mind could to present
deliberate dgnfed manner the testimony tend'ne 10
show that this man an district judge
scrap OF IT, since
approximately l6o dHerent cases
to weed out to gather the facts respect to It,
And these
district and FAR west as
I'm, Nav when conse urges that has
idle or that with the result
result other than the renecuo"
n n;s nwn md upon his own fairness
any that character save such
one only personally desires to prejudice you
enst a n, fair and compete investigation that
result state do not know Wna ca e
Mr. Tracy interrupt just moment you said
absolutely assistance to about the 2oth OF MARCH,
half truth is always worse mucn worse
always considering when one ues nan
truth reprehnsbe tnan ne
who is stating Of assistance counsel
Immediately following it spoke Oh mr.
Sn1ler being assistance in the preparation
ITSELF In office have had assistance MAD my se"
ographers office Every member the Board OF
has done telephoned and e
graphed and some OF me members u ne + j.; n.
journeys the state meant III INC
and counsel didn't know would De very sa
explain will understand the matter His ne
preparation of the case and
Now is time get parting either going
Let take with you
:agan feel this very important
Mr. President: That question finally
the authorities Of the state OF North
and all the states of the Union to draw from w
proposition settled that have to
But that doesn't any senator upon
the final voting to say to himself he does not believe n we nave l
settled the question of the delayed cases being
senator has the right upon final voting
don't constitute lmpeach
.able'o fense
Mr. George A. Bangs That question and in
regard question this: Tc
bve
charge does not constitute
an mneacabe onense It will be vote either
guilty specification charges They must
that they have not been
proved language employed in the section
this Senate decided it has juris
acquta the ground that the Senate itself has
not jurisdiction that is matter
Senate Upon the final vote
question: the defendant guilty charged
specification of charge something
this respondent is not guilty and to do that
that the Senate has Jurisdiction absolute
employed the Code and the authority
being had Enough of that
this Senate should have
and finally settled and and from
that discussed in
the sole and only question u.s. Is the
that question will aye nay upon
each of the specifications
Now again. North
that has been involved and everything
myself resolution that presented to the House
and was adopted by the House. unoer "ncn 'ne oasa ~
That resolution adopted by the House
voted down the theory that the Board of Man.
ayers from that time forward had
description and dollar of
with
this and that time the
produced here private and
the Devils Lake bunch but of
the bring
Senate couldn't obtain credit by them
wasn't anybody advanced
it. home sat down in Office
this matter WITH and the Board OF
said this Senate we
which gather evidence for the trial OF this
resolution and it didn't get very
preparation Of the
and couldn't from whatsoever.
at this time
the to bring that proposition
but If he wants
compare witnesses with him. and will set
will take the wit
through from the beginning
won't be much to the credit OF
respondent this don't wonder that they
shouldn't investigation into that
register comparison Who made with
is has possession Of the files in
the state this