The Seattle star. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1899-1947, 1911-11-25
TEE DISTINCTION BROAD AND

Il
| fAwiran government IL no far re-
mote from q government Of law that
II does not require the perfection %
human reason TO discern the diNilnrs
tlon: iawless government IL % men.
based on the will and material In
tercat 81 those who won the insiiiu-
tione upon which the people must de-
ha sed ON the puhlic good and the viii
of the commonwealth. The former
leads 10 arlnfocracy and slavery.
while the latter stands for the pop
| uiar rights and economic indcpend-
ence Of tho citlIon,
The United States Supreme Court
| used the following language IN a case
where an exercise 81 arbitrary power
tlawicEs powerl was shown 20 exist
For the very idea that one man may
be compelled 20 hold his life or the
means 81 living or any material right
essential 10 the enjoyment OF life Mt
the mere will of another. seems 20 be
intoirfablc IN any country whore free
dom prevails. AZ being ~ the essence
OF slavery itself" "in fact. an ordi-
nance which clothes single indivi-
dual with such power fiawless nrbi-
trary powsrl hardly falls within the
this standard the American people
arc patient slaves because ~ IL the
mere will Of the captains Of industry
| who control the means of living OF
| 2Nf NOEAfNk tfAHHa nlu fuHtIHA NHf
common people by the exercise OF the
| powers 81 government In their class
Interest against tho public welfare.
DENTAL Law LAwLEss
The Dental Law OF this state In
lawiess because the standard OF quail
state. but by the Dental Board The
United States Supreme Court. In the
case OF Dent va. West Virginia. has
said; The nature and extent Of
qualifications required must depend
primarily upon the Judgment OF the
state ns TO their necessity" But tho
Judgment OF our state does not pre-
scribe standard for Dentists The
Dental Board preHcribes the standard
larbitrnriiv and for that reason. no
have iawlesa government OF men
| because the Dental Board IL the State
of Washington in this case. This In
the very essence or lswlesH govern
| ment personified, and the alarming
aspect uf the situation Is that this
principle has been presented to our
| Supreme Court time and again. and
| that institution has given emphn sis
| to the doctrine that the Dental Board
should decide what IL n reasonable
standard OF qualification for Dentists
who wish 10 live In this state.
Dentists are compelled 10 hold
their rights subject 10 the mere will
| or the Dental Board. the same Ba tho
great Industrial army OF the work
| Ing class are compelled TO hold their
| life and the means OF living at the
mere Will OF the few who own the
means 20 sustain human life Ia this
| country. Their ownership compels
| them to exploit the people, and when
| the peoples representatives viii not
stand for the rule OF the few. the
| courts. who are responsible to the
| few for appointment 10 their official
| life, do what the representatives of
| the people did not dare To do Law
less government has It's foundation
and ia based on tho failure OF our
courts TO be guided by and follow the
| written law. In failing TO interpret
| that which the Legislature enacts in
20 law In the interest of the people
| Instead OF the interest of the spccial
privileged class There Is no longer
any question that our courts have
made one law for tho rich and an.
other for the poor. The private own.
ership OF the institutions OF produc.
| ton and distribution have divided our
people. and the will OF the owning
class In the basis Of lawiess govern.
npwIr =. nRowN. d. d. a..
7l3 First Ave-, Union Block.