Perrysburg journal. (Perrysburg, Wood Co., O. [Ohio]) 186?-1965, 1911-08-18
ar EHE nv az EAl- AARExJZ @7

great American humorist said n a speech before
the representatives of the Associated Press that
everybody thought they could write play, run
a hotel or edit newspaper" He might have en-
larged his list by adding become successful
farmer" To put seed in the ground and see 1t
grow seems easy that almost every one imag-
ines himself capable of doing 1t successfully. But
we know that farming, that is. successful farm
ing, is both science and a business. One can
make Just as complete failure of farming as he
can of practicing law, running a hotel or edit
ing newspaper. 1t would be worse than useless
to encourage the Back to the Soil" movement II
It is not planned and executed in way that is
likely to be successful. The natural yearning to
get back to the soil" that comes to most people
causes such movement to appeal to those who
we'll qualified. well to those who
poorly qualified successfully to do their part as
cultvators of the soil. To go back to the soil
is to the man of ordinary means and under ord-
nary circumstances something like pioneering,
and not every man, by any means, Is capable Of
becoming successful pioneer. To undertake in
discriminatory, unscientifcally and without proper
method and organization, to get people back to
the soil will result in of failures than sue
cesses; In more of injury than of good. But this
work be accomplished in way that will be
both effective and successful and which will in
crease the proportion Of producers compared
with consumers All that Is necessary for the
accomplishment Of this result is that the same fore
sight and organization should be adopted in start
ing the business of farming Is adopted in the
INAUGURATION OF any Otner business enterprise III
men of means who also have the disposition to
help their fellow men, would realize that they
could make good paying investment as we'll as
relieve distress and suffering by helping others
to return to the soil in the right way the back to
the soip' movement would then give promise of
accomplishing all that its enthusiasts have claim.
ed for it. Such movement must of course be
under taken on a bushes basis; upon plan which
will promise not only a profitable return on the
investment, but result in giving good homes and
steady employment to many people who need both
1t is easy enough to say to the poor of the large
cities that they should "go back to the
soil;" but for the successful accomplishment of
such result money, and considerable money, is
required. One cannot expect to make a living on
few hundred dollars invested in a farm and the
machinery necessary for its cultivation any more
than one can expect to make living ON the same
amount invested in any other business. So in
the first place, 1t requires money or credit to
buy farm, and money credit to secure neces
sary implements. machinery horses cows etc. to
successfully conduct It, 1t will take from five to
one hundred and sixty acres according to the char
acter of the soil and the methods of Its cultivation
to support family You cannot expect large re-
turns from poor farm, or from good farm poor
ly cultivated. You cannot expect to receive re-
turn from farming investment out of all pro.
portion to the value of the investment and the
labo expended thereon. The difficulty in this
proposition begins at once. Many of those whom