Albuquerque evening herald. [volume] (Albuquerque, New Mexico) 1911-1914, 1911-05-18


mittcc reported tina, he hal already
intss gated the matter. ana recon-.
mondcd that the issue nt made
which The council authorized City
! Clcrk McManus 10 do
\ omilain from \ B,rin regard.
! iug The erection of a iaTeu frame
/ huilding by The Rio Giaude InmhO.
/ compau' at the corner of Third aud
| Ma,qnoito avooaos wac roaa. and rr.
icfI"d tu tho riioya,rc comMitf,,.
! Nj llcrtn who owns propcri, meas
/ ih' nuiihiur. stated that the structure
! Was unsirh'lF ana tina, al 30 was
uF"i iut saw aud planning mill. the
! noise aud vibration caused wnr ven.
| disppfccahlo We also said thar b.
dust arising from IL war tho cause oi
| q sioai deal of Inconvenience and
aslcd thst some action b. tnkcn b..
| IA, council ~ Iogaf 10 the matter
lie cited Section i3i 81 the rcccnu,
l coniilod city ordinance az ground
! foi his complain Th,s section re-
iai's 90 public nuisnncos mFl thou
nbntcmcai
The communication from the Good
CrizouF League was then ta.vn
up This petition citcd sections lig IT,
555 81 H. OTIS ordinances rs author.
'tr for rcl OF
largc numDor Of ministers md
representative chuchmon wore pres.
cni 10 advocate the adoption OF u
resolution looking 20 the enforce nout
ot Che ordinances cited Included in
th,s number wcic Re, ~ T. WI.
Hans Eer G O Bockman. Rcv ! !.
RunAan ! T. Elder u \ Porter.
held. Rc, Hugh \ Cooper and
nfhcrs
The petition was ngncd hy 4 com.
miitoo composed of J. y Eds. Ter.
mun =. Williams. HUH a Cooper.
joas" j Ruuyau, " W Ralph. Dahl
iIolcomb ana J.. r beck. as he Goa.
miiteo having The matter in cnaFse
Councilman Angc requested tina,
ne sections cited IN the aii.ion 10
rcad after which Councilman Cocn
moved that the entire matter he r.
fcrrcd to a special committee oi three,
to BE- appointed b, the mayor
In the absence at the chairman o,
Tia, peiitioning committee. ttes. H. A.
Cooper called upon Rev. III l., Vii
Hams io address The council. ana Mr.
Williams urged that body 10 .aAe
some measure loolinc TO the enforce.
ment 81 the ordnance
We believe that the Hep We are
urging Is In harmony with tna grow.
ing sentiment nj the better classes
Ia the cts. he ioid. "and We 10 not
eAp"gt any scrious oppOsl;Iun 10 the
removal of this district from the
neart ot the city nj l.n~t Nh vii
lians then outlined The purposes of
the Good Ctizons league. aud as.
surcd The council of its supper In
the action he favored The t'mc has
come ho continued iot this all
ynnccd step along moral lines. Just
az he time has CON, Tor our city io
take advanced steps along other lines |
The law expresses - very hi.h |
sentiment and appears easy ~ en-
forrcmcnt The only question IL the |
backing the council viii receive in en-
forcing II We assu'a the council at |
our support nei,cso ,ia; Inc l1lcd !
expense which the removal Of this |
,hing from the city viii email will be
entirely wurrant,a hv the advning =
10 BE- obtained II "a. ~ course ra,h
or difficult "a choose The place Ia
which II must he renoypi, hn, IN iha,
AZ IN other things some liberation
muT bc looked for
Vi williams then spoke OF tn.
course o. action aia down by tho |
law. reminded the counclinen of their |
oaths Of office ana again pledged them |
he support oil IA. lcaguc
Rev. G.. q. Hickman then stated |
That The movement Tor the abolition |
of the district. or AZ least for its re-
moval, hnd not sprung from the min.
istcrs. but from the body % the |
league
Mayor Elder then asked why tho |
committee had presented the matter
t. the council while Il was pending "a /
tho district court. saving that court |
had II under adVisomcnt al present
Nj. Williams said that ne was ig- |
norant az The matter heinz in court |
al present. ana further stated that NJ |
believed the ciiN council Offered tho |
host Held FOR getting some action at |
once
Mayor Elder then outlined the facts |
of thc matter being IA court AZ pres
ont. under injunction urorecdings. |
ana pointed out thut under the act |
OF March -. 1901. the council had |
Jurisdiction only over those portions |
81 tho city not Within 1p0 feet OF any |
I''''fN NHf'' f'iA ififi'fH "NNA nN ~ \
church or theater llc said also that |
nothing would De gained by taking |
action at once, because the courts |
action would either du away with the |
houses - il fame 90 which objection
WAS made or would leavc them whcr"
They are, IN which ease they would
remain outside the councils jurlsdic-
ton
'1r the Injunction Is Issued the
places viii be- cleaned up he said,
'Hud II u 81 not ISSUED Il viii bc O
waste of tho city's time Tor II 90 take
action for We have no Jurisdiction
over the matter AT all
j T.. Elder then asked II the or
dinnnccs were In accord with the ter,
ritorlal statutes
Mr.. Williams urged that tho matter |
be- made the subject Of test ease
Mayor Elder said why would il |
be nccossHrN Ia do thisg II would /
nniS pilc - costs on the county"
Mr. Williams urged thai the city |
Vlndicn,e its risht 90 regulate its own |