Norwich bulletin., 1911-11-18
THREE DIvoRcEs GRANTED
 BY JUDGE REED
Wife Ran Of with Tramp, Testified the Husband-crueIty and Desertion Are the Other Grounds.

At the short calendar session of the superior court here Friday there were five uneortested divorces on the list. three of which were granted and two were continued.
 Claiming that her husband was cruel to her. Agnes A. Tulin of Jewett City testified that she married George J. Tuiin of Ossining, formerly of Grls- wold. They were married January 10. 1908, by Rev. J. H. Fitzmaurice- Their one child died Sine claimed that he was a gambler and was always want to work get her own living and did dressnlaIxinE. She said her husband chol1ed her for paying 65 cents for medicine and she had been under the doctor care because of his treatment. He had kicked her down stairs and put her out of the house at midnight. 9th CTS testified 70 acts of cruelty and the divorce was granted and she was all lowed to resume her niaiden name of Vars.
 Charge of Dssertisn.
 Cornena Carrier of Colchester. in her suit against Oren Carrier for a divorce, stated that she is now living with her grand father, J. G. Clark of Mfddlct town November 27, 1902, and have two children. In 1906 the hus- band told her he was going to New York state to look for work and it was thought woman in the family went with him. as she left at the same time. They had lived happily but he has never since done anything for his family She saw hin in Boston in January Ind he favored inc divorce. Judge Reed granted the petition and dren.
 In I-eve with a Tramp.
 On :ne grounds of adultery, James B. Brigham of Waterford was given a divorce from Hattie B. Brigham of New London, whosa maiden name was They were married No- vennber Is. 1896. and have five chiI- dren.
 MT Brigham testified that a tramp Mike Hogan applied to him for work in March. but, having none, he allowed him to stay until April when Mrs. Brigham began to neglect her work and prefer to be in the compeny Of Mike Tn the barn. Do as he would, the husband could not prevail upon her to give up her affinity. She admit ted being in Hogan's room and to her wedding vows.
 Mike left and went to work for a neighbor. and Mrs. Brigham failed to do better and he told her she must go also. She went to New London. where he has been paying her board, but she has been keeping poor com panW there. She has kept in touch with Mike and telephoned to her soul mate. but has never called to see her ehiidren- She asked ner husband to take Ter back. but he refused. The farlnhands told cf her wrong doings with Mike the tramp
 me decree was granted and Mir. Brigham was given the custody of his five children. He conducts a large farm and runs 2 talIow business
 Short Calendar. Pleadings ill two weeks were ordered in the case of Meyers vs Pfeiffer. adm, on motion for judgment by de fault. Bonds for costs were also or dered in two weeks, the amount being
 Additional bonds of $50 in two efano Vs. Paracenti ct ux. and bonds or SIS for costs were ordered in the same time in the case of Intjli vs. Ed sIs a breach of promise case.
 The motion in the case Of Fox vs ' OK. that tae defendant be defaulief Tor failure to comply with the order CT the court, was granted unless the previous eraer of the court is com pied with before next Friday and un- less that action is taken it will be placed on the uncontested list.
 motion for a more specific state nent was partially granted and par tially denied in the case of Peck ct al- ys- town of Windhan3.
 Bonds for costs to the amount of SIS were ordered in the case of Shahan vs Murphy, exr.
 The motion for hearing on a mo- ton for Judgment by default in tn, case or Ducy vs oufff ct ux., was con- tinued for three months.
 In the case of karoh ys. karoli, the court ordered. the plaintiff to file spe- ciheations and bill ef particulars of tie acts of cruelty charged aeainss the defendant in conformity with the defendants motion therefor on file.
 cs ses Assigred.
 The following cases were assigned:
 Tuesday, E.v. 21-Knowles ct al. vs he Industrial Trust Co. appeal from probate
 Wednesday. Nov. 22--Allen vs. city sf New Iondcn: Allen vs. New Haven cad sissr ingto.i vs. Islissviile MIls D.
 Thursday, Nov. 23-Musial ct ux. vs. <udlik: Rogers vs. Seltz Co: N. F. I ebrew Farmers etc, society vs. schwartz Raushtigan vs. Norwi-h Nickel & Brass Cc.
 Tuesday Dec. --(Special-Alien. ld~r .. l. V. Bishop Cs