Bismarck daily tribune. [volume] (Bismarck, Dakota [N.D.]) 1881-1916, 1911-05-03
TRACY BANGS MAKES AN ELOQUENT Plea
Continued from page ninc.)

10 nv hrothe but what we were put upon the witness
would probably endeavo to
OF bushes came to u.s. we Simply
pem closed and out of the way ana nere s
an attorney just the other thing ""
don't rush. Why reputationhe attorneys haven't
for rushing the reputation unless
And the courts the victims OF the
negligence OF attorneys in practically every instance ~ ~ "
delay
Now let us proceed Cartier against
Bruegge sound Cartier against Bruegser is
another case Governor Burke 1t is another case
that was delayed Youngboo and George Gilmore
and finally delays And was told to
YOU testified that one
the title that John Buegger had from
the railroad company whom he was
endeavong Wiliston refused TO take
the deed awaiting securing by John ueg
ger Of title that would be good you
And then John fr"egsr was ooosht oo" ee
suppose showing gentlemen that that was
mistake his deeds They are in the
suppose look them haven't the deeds mere nov"
but you remember deed that he had from the
that he had at the time he was attempt
ing had reservation in winch gave
the the right that land at
any who bought lot there TOOK su
iect to right railroad put their track man
track operation of their trains
over any time they fit And so the case
was delayed awaiting better deed by Brueger from
the railroad company here with deed dated in
June 1901 1901 from the railroad
to him and thew present that deed
should But looking at that eeo
what do we that not put of record until
" ,ooo. +u Aus,s+ 1903 and whv? Why was it puto
record before August tell u.s. Didn't Mr.
Bruegger June 1901 He was waiting ne sa'o
until he could get John Burke and as soon
as he got It. he and took him from june
1901 Burke to tell him put the deed on
record that to John cowan John co~an IS
answerabe John Buegger couldn't get communication
John Burke from June 1901 until August lSo
What more 81 have faint reco
lection that about the right of way submitted
to Cowan some time then he advised having
the deed recorded 1907 Now gentlemen just
lake the ordinary the ordinary affairs OF e
much from the and "he
YOU start atory tactics when you Deg oe
laying thing and that thing and the other thing na' u
case OF Gar
delayed by the judge but was s
have sufficient title to the land second a
because Buegger coudh get au
his counsel and it was delayed
third why but say to you that when you nho ~
these Bruegges failure OF u "
reason is fair presume that these
same delay much responsible Tor
anv further delays You have had
presented court of North
Dakota something about section 1882
hos nothing to do with the case decide that
Cowan had delayed than know and
know when can lie IN BURKE o'
daugh Office the in the case Of oxendahl "
ales did, papers found the search
the death of attorney as was the case IN the case Oh
Brueg-copies they sadwhen these things can nappe
doesn't bring the who are
the who are neelectfu OF
the who lose the files! DID
any you fes Did attorney who is member
of this exception
lose them in own Office unless you
big box and throw everything into the
box and then through until find it.
Judge Cowan they
Judge Cowan because these papers were lost
The Kgore a. that believe stands
unexplained testimony Mr. Mddugh 1t was some
appeal from justice court
testify to
that recollection faint recollection that
question law appeal from justice court Mr.
Thomas attorney believe has left the
finding him just what the
particular explanation except that
it is one of sometimes mind There
nothing show that he ntmae
decision objected delay and
explained before in the course
and didn't know
evidently little from justice
and probably of those of little moment and so little I'M
poance and all interested simply
until it here,
prosecution effort
position
district because Of those delays.
this connection just word with respect to
begin taking
presiding officer statement
that the
question: Is this
hold the position Judge of the
district?