The Marion daily mirror. (Marion, Ohio) 1892-1912, 1911-02-10

In the case of the f. d. McKinnls
company against the Hooking Valley
Railway company. the amended an
swer of the defendant has been filed
by Attorneys Scofeld and Durfee and
Lyon and Rector of Columbus.
The railway company admits that
a shipment of prunes consisting OF
600 boxes was delivered to 1t in CO.
lumbus. The car contained 120 boxes
and II was taken to Wellston where
120 boxes were unloaded and the car
was then brought to Marion. The
company claims there was due for
freight, demurrage and switching
charges, the sum of s143.S2 which the
plaintiff refused to pay. The ship
mcnt was then sold for $3.50 and the
charges deducted. There is now in
the hands of the company s1,10G.lS
the residue from the sale.
The McKinnis company brought suit
against the railway company for ST.
6l2.1S, and the case was set for hear
ing last week. Time was given the de-
fcndant to file the amended answer
and the case was taken out of the as
signment.
The railway company asks judg-
ment for $143.S2 and for leave to pay
the $1,1O6.1S to the court,
The case OF George Fucks against
Herman Kalkbrenner has been dis
missed.
The court tried for two hours, this
morning to find two cases which
could be assigned for trial oi Mon
day and Tuesday of next week, but
was unsuccessful. The docket shows
only about three hundred cases, but
in none OF these We're the attorneys
ready for the trial. There were two
cases set down for these days, but
they had to be taken out of the as
slgnment because of the absence OF
some OF the attorneys from the city.
The result Is that the jury has been
notified not to report for duty until
Wednesday morning.
In the case of the state of Ohio
against Pearl Nogglc, a motion for Il
new trial has been filed by attorneys
Quigley and Johnson and Crjssingcr
and CUTLERY. Error is the ground
upon which the new trial is asked.
Samuel Miller was brought into
court Thursday morning on charge
of contempt. for failing to pay twen-
ty-Gve dollars each month to his di-
Vorced wife. The divorce was grant
ed April 2S, 1909 and Miller has fail
ed to pay the alimony assessed
against him. Miller told the court
a hard luck story, and was informed
that he would have to arrange TO
pay the amount claimed by the court
to be due his former wife.
ID. II. Crissinger receiver for the
Commercial Club company has filed
his report with the court for approv-
al The report shows receipts and
disbursements amounting to $ll,l29'S,
The case of John ID. DeGolley
against II. w. Sager has been dis
missed by the plaintiff.
The case of William j. Ochs
against Samuel Turner and others has
been settled.
An order of revlvor has been made
In the case OF Robert l.. Berry
against II. A, Foster.
The case OF Mary l.. Kramer
against the state of Ohio has been
dismissed.
The case of Nancy Berry against
Add Il. Berry has been dismissed.
The case of Lester Strawser against
The Huber Manufacturing company
has been dismissed for failure 10
comply with the order of the court.
In the case of Henry Sauer against
Mary Mozier, l.. r.. Myers has
withdrawn as attorney for the plain
tiff.
In the case of Patrick ! ReaTdon
against John q. Webb and others has
been ordered on the docket.
---.--'--- 80 '4'.. - '.' ---'-'