The Ely miner., 1911-09-01

the oletime lumbermen of Maine and Michi.
gan. Instead, these Pacific coast fellows con-
struct shelf" on the side of the tree to be
felled and at such height that the chopping
and saving is done at point at least ten or
twelve feet above ground. The result is. Of
course to leave a huge stump containing
enough material to build small house. The
lumbermen justify their action by the tradi
ton that the swell" at the base of one Of
these big trees is of inferior material-pre-
sumably too poor to bother with. However.
most of the expert foresters of the country
say that this is not true. at least not in the
majority of cases and that this method Of
mutilating timber in the oSstiaa is a flag
rantly wasteful one.
One of the most seriously wasSeyM methods
of numbering in vogue in the Unitec states
looked at from the standpoint of future sener'
ations-is the practice Of taking from forest
annually an amount of lumber far in excess
of new growth. Obviously this will serve tG
either speedily wipe out forest or else
render it of little value for many years t.
come. whereas it might be made to serve as
a regular and permanent source of income.
Indeed this plan of intelligent harvesting OF
the timber with reference to the supply OF fu-
ture years is what renders so steadily proht-
able the admirably con Quoted forests of Ger
many and Switzerland
OF course the American lumberman is en-
gagged in logging as a source of livelihood ana
his main defense against every charge OF
wasteful numbering is that there is so mucn
timber in proportion to the population that II
does not pay, as a business proposition. to
take any more than the better part OF eacn
tree felled. Unquestionable there is grain
of truth in this, provided a lumberman Is
thinking only of prosperity in the present gen
Grafton. but at the same time there is mucn
waste in numbering that is not only unneces-
sary but is actually costly to the lumberman
himself. However, conservative numbering Is
making headway and is supplanting the old
wasteful methods in many sections or the
country The new ideas of conservative lunl-
bering are based on three principles. First.
the forest is treated as working capital the
purpose ef which Is to produce successive
crops. Second, systematic working plan is
followed in harvesting the forest crop Third,
the work in the woods is carried on in such
manner as to leave the standing trees and
the young growth as nearly unharmed by the
numbering as is possible. In the actual oper'
ations of tree telling the new policy calls Tor
greater care, so that no tree trunk may be
split or broken in falling and likewise are
there precautions so that the bark of valuable
standing trees will not be rubbed or torn ny
the tree trunks that are being "skidded' out
of the forest. Finally ban has been placed
on the wasteful practice of cutting promising
young trees for corduroy or skids simply be-
cause these happen to be convenient and are
straight Under the old plan the waste does
not end when a log gets to the saw mill
There is further loss of nearly all the slabs
and edgings and all the sawdust not used for
fuel, so that 1t is doubtful If more than half
of the cubic contents of the standing tree is
finally used.