Norwich bulletin., 1911-11-17
SiSTARE CASE HAS
 HAD LONG RUN.
Decision Handed Down by Judge Reed
 Gives Mrs. Sistare the AIimony.

Before Judge Thayer in the superior court judgment was given Mathilde V. F. Sistare vs. Julia L. Sistare, exc. of the estate of Horace R. Sistare to re- cover $5.905 and costs as aIimony. he and Judge Shumway having held that New York divorce permitted action for alimony in this state. where he had property
 The defendants testator appealed to the supreme court, and that reversed the decision of the superior court and ordered it remanded for judgment for the defendants teStator.
 The plaintiff then appealed to the tinted States supreme court and Julia Sistare was made a party de- fendant- The United States supreme court ordered that the judgment of the Connecticut supreme court be re- versed with costs and the case be re- manded to the superior court for fur ther proceedings. Then the Connecti- cut supreme court ordered their former judgment set aside and the cause re-
 manded to the superior court to be
 proceeded with in accordance with the
 United States supreme court decision
 The superior court on July 19, 1910, adJudged in accordance with the Unit co States supreme courts mandate in for of the plaintiff for $6,995.O3
 Under date of Feb. 13, 1911. w B. Colt brought an action of interpIead- ingfi alleging that on July II, 1904 as administrator of the estate of Robert Colt. who was trustee of the estate of Abner Bassett, he had in his posses sion large sum or money belonging to Horace R. Sistare and was served with attachment for $12,000 in the suit of M. V. E. Sistare Vs. H. +. Sistare, and that on March ?, 1907, R. H. Sis tare assigned to Brandegee, Moves and Brandegee so much of that money as should be sufficient to pay them for services and disbursements in that suit
 On Feb. 22. 1909. Mir. sistare, also assigned his interest in the same funds to Julia l.. Sistare. MT. Sistare died Jan. 2S. 1909, and Julia l.. Sistare was made executrix. On Aug. 1, 1910 a de- mand was made on him on an execu- ton on judgment rendered July 19 1910. The lawyers also claimed for their services and Julia L. Sistare also claimed the money for herself and also as executrix for the estate. He set up that he was ignorant of the respective rights of the defendants. He had no claim on the property, but had HOO in his possession to be delivered as the court directs. The defendants threat ened on Nov. l, 1910, to bring suit He asked that they interplead to determine rights.
 On June g. 1911. Mrs. Sistare brought suit of scire facias against Mir Colt to show cause why he should not gay money to her under the Judgment. Attorneys representing Mrs Sistare on June 30. 1911. moved for judgment up- on pleadings and all proceedings. The motion came up for hearing at short calendar session at New London dur ing the September session and Judge Reed rendered his decision on it Thursday.
 The motion is granted the plaintiff, W. E. Colt, in the interpleader action. Eo is directed to pay over the fund in his possession to the defendant, Ma thilde Won Eliert Sistare. and there upon he discharged.
 He held that the hrSt judgment. was revived by the United States supreme court and is the final judgment