The Prince George's enquirer and southern Maryland advertiser. (Upper Marlborough, Md.) 1882-1925, 1911-01-27

may well he presumed that Father
NJ, having received O'Rafferty's
confession, was in the act Of reach
ing out for the restoration Of the
stolsn money when accosted by the
messenger. Believing himself to be
the possessor of the only information
that would lead to this important
event, he was Of course somewhat
puzzled at what had taken place, but
he convinced me that he was quite
anxious to render any assistance in
mis- power to recover the rest Of the
money. At my request he went in to
talk with the man and his wife.
assured him that they would be re-
leased and not further molested If
they would give up the stolen money.
went farther than this and said that
if he could promise me that the
money would be returned within the
next twentE-four hours | would at once
release the two prisoners. After in
terviewing them, he came outside and
requested me to let the man and his
wife go home He said everything
would be we'll at IL o'clock on the fol.
lowing day, and his request was COM
piled with. The good father was
greatly concerned about what was to
become of O'Rafferty.
"This.' said he, rs the first great
sin of this young mans life. On &C.
count of the sickness Of his wife he
has been greatly pressed for money.
IN a moment of weakness he yielded to
temptation" The father did not say
It, but inferred that with him full
confession and restitution meant re-
pentance, forgiveness and a pardon
from God. In this particular case,
however, a law made by man stood in
the way. How was it to be overcome?
realized that affairs were very
much mixed at this time, and that
there were many otherwise honest
people who might find a ready excuse
for a thief from the United States
government While a condition Of this
kind could not be plead as a bar to
ORafferty's punishment, it might be
offered in palliation Of the crime; he
1l1lSuL nave Iel1dlASu Ale@1A
had not the opportunity been thrust
upon him. had made promises to
the good father and might have
imagined the confession of the culprit
a solemn absolution of his sin; hence
my deep sympathy and determination
to procure his release.
The balance of the money was all
returned by the priest as promised,
but the difficult point in the case was
yet to be accomplished How was
ORafferty to be let out? l might have
unlocked his cell door and allowed
l>hfm to walk out, but he would not be
ifree, as he would be liable to be ar
other officers. He had now
feopenly told the simple story Of the
robbery and there was nothing further
to detect.
He said he had no thought Of steal
ing the sack when the paymaster
stepped out of the cab, but when left
alone the idea flashed through his
| brain to drive to his home with 1t,
where he made an attempt to bury 1t
in the litter pile. Abandoning this
plan, he drove to his brother-in-law's
house. On arriving there he found his
sister washing clothes in the yard. He
told her in a hurried manner that he
had brought a big lot of money and
that he would leave 1t with her to
take care of. He put the portemon-
naie in a box under the shed in the
yard and covered it with hay. There
!were two of the husbands brothers
| sleeping in the house at the time;
they were bakers by trade, working
nights and sleeping in the day time.
When they got up in the afternoon
the sack containing the money was
pointed out to them. They cut II
open and divided its contents, as near
as they could guess, into three equal
parts. Leaving one-third for the SIS
ter, they hid the other two-thirds for
themselves. Poor O'Rafferty. who real
" did not know very much about the
contents of the sack, was left out IN
the cold
The city of New Orleans was under
martial law at this time, and offend
| the provost court. The judge was
puritanical in principle and clothed
with almost unlimited power. He was
considered quite unapproachable, yet
| determined to visit him at his house
on behalf of O'Rafferty. | found him
| a much more generous man than
had thought him to be. He listened
7 toll hin, tho story
of the robbery and the part the priest
| had taken in recovering the money. L
nut I'D the best plea l could for tbs
prisoner and his sick wife. | was GER
tain that the Judge was interested and
his heart softened He said he would
| take the case under advisement, but
said nothing to indicate what his de-
2ision might be.
| A trial in a provost court at New
| Orleans in that day was rather
brief affair. 1t consisted mostly OF an
| accusation and a sentence. When
| O'Rafferty was arraigned, he pleaded
guilty to the charge of stealing the
| 500. 900. In few brief moments the
Judge made an order for his confine-
| ment at Fort Jackson for period OF
years. l felt quite sore on account OF
this decision, but was little sur
prised when he called me up and
thrust the order for the prisoners
commitment in my hand. l saw that
was charged with his delivery to the
commanding officer Of the fort, fea-
ture of the program that was certain
ly not in my line, and l jumped at the
conclusion that the responsibility for
his release was resting upon my Shout
ders.
Two days afterwards l returned the
order of commitment with report of
the prisoners escape Endorsed upon
its back. The Judge smiled his SEEM
ing approval. O'Rafferty's release
may have been illegal, but | believe 1t
was justified by the pardon he re-
l, I,,fa 80 h.,