Bismarck daily tribune. [volume] (Bismarck, Dakota [N.D.]) 1881-1916, 1911-05-02

of drunkenness.
Mr. racot moved:
That a until eight o'clock
which prevailed,
a until eight o'clock
eight o'clock taken
Mr. Smker Mr. President gentlemen, WILL account OF the short
space allotted this evening, into the various other
matters that fune with which at
place before and will conne myself to
discussion of the Incidents together with the false ceh
charge will few delayed and then will close
and all of you gentlemen will be more than pleased when shall
finally sit down.
his opening address, when he speaking to
concerning the drug stores and MS right TO frequent " ana
follows The that going read his statement
BECAUSE mind the remarkable statements that
have ever heard made says brings
the first place. the drug do not amount to anything
law Judgment There just three or four men
given testimony with reference to drinking and
testimony BranchAowc Crowley and Avery Johnson and
you every Of these will be mpeached and wiped
before through We will show that they are not the men
that they sold their lives drink OF
whisey drug will attend the matter of the drug stores
three occasions
and drink for myself and right that improbable
oense taking consideration all Of subsequent acts peach me-
nearly recall them, and will
the Incidents and will that have violated no law of the
Of North Dakota doing and the in whose place
North Dakota far
will the drug because
there has been attempt here to bring this matter into
consideration when is nothing but buncombe You have right to walk
Dakota and buy all the whiskey that he will
sell because he takes the chances of breaking the law and break
you punished, when there did
there judge If down drug store here and ask to
he does give to judge he gives it to John
F. Cowan and he Does I right
penalty OF the law is violated do not have
responsibility applied and will tell further that do not have
prosecute than and there
obligation any than there them
Your friend be murdered here Your friend Sk might be
ded in your presence says prosecute
de there nothing compel do it. There nothing
of the and make complaint charging
Mr. Nestos with having murdered him. is duty that citizen
him
degree with reference selling Intoxicating liquors.
that delivered,
has failed uanae single statement that he had made there
this the Of peac
BranAowe Avery Johnson and Crowley? Have their been
mentioned who has appeared this witness stand behalf
Of the defense? Not
feature OF this concerned the evidence stands mere showing a
John only three times drank the drug
but that he and hundred times drank in those various drug
the and paid for not he
there and the liquor drank without making
No. and the evidence stands here that he has from time
time uented those drug stores and not necessary for me go
consideration evidence the evidence which
submitted But Avery Johnson Crowley BranchAow Monroe Branch
flower Timboe, John Mike Doheny These three Avery
Johnson Branchfowe and Crowley not the testified
with respect there Pete Kton this German that
the Tmboe Mike Doeny; John Kelly Tom Gagn;
eight different witnesses who have appeared the witness stand
behalf of the this and each and of them have
testified the purchase liquor by John Cowa in those
drug They claim Improbable onse 1t asserted
by them that the judge the district has the right frequent these
places where Intoxicating liquors illegally sod under statute, and
be called and concede the legal PROPOSE
ton that into drug and buy all the intoxicating
liquors desire
attached but that Of judge of the district
under his moral obligation uphold the laws and the
laws he guilty of oene he also guilty by Of the
Dakota, with respect
this proposition desire from Of the Senators who
delivered talk the Swayne in the United States Senate which,
my mind applicable particular
Vioon of the law be justified Cemeny indeed be
tended offender condition cemency
fault; promise abstain from
It has remained for judge not apologize for violation of
statute; ask justify it. Here
acknowledgment of ofese neither
for it, of amendment
There who by his oath of office and the of his
questioning binding application every
and Judge administer Sir citizen
who believes law be oppressive ntorabe under moral
obligation dobeys it, he simply risks the penalty
denounced violations of it. But judge merely
from the judgment but he compelled the
his his