The Washington herald., 1911-03-14
Supreme Court of the United States.

Edward Baton, cf Cincinnati. Ohio; n. c. Frengrr,
OF Las Cruces y. Mex; ]. II. Paxton. Ot Las
Cruces. n. Mex; John H. BuroId. CT Guthrie.
Okla, and MyrOn G. BrUnner, Of Little Falls, ~
Y, admitted to practics.
No. 30 Stuart Lindsey. appellant. vs.. Natural
Carbonic Gas Company ct al; appeal from the
Circuit Court Of the United States for the Southern
district of New York decree affirmed with costs
Opinion BY Mr. Justice Van DcTanter.
No. +O7. Stella +. Flint, general guardian.
&c. appellant, vs.. Stone Tracy Company ct al. +;
appeal from the Circuit Court Of the United States
for the District cf Vermont:
No. 4Oe. WyckOf Van Derhoef appellant vs. The
Coney Island and Brooklyn Railrad Company ct
al; appeal from the Circuit Of the United States
for the Southern district Of New York
No. 40. Francis L. Hine. appellant Us. Home
Life Insurance Company ct al; appeal from the
Circlt Court Of the United States for the Southern
! district n New York;
No. AL Fred W. Smith. appellant vs. The
Northern Trust Company ct al. appeal from the
Circuit CourC Of the United States for the Northern
district of Illinois;
No 4l2 William H. Miner. appellant vs. The
Com Exchange National Bank Of Chicago ct al :;
appeal from the Circuit Court Of the United States
for the Northern district Of Illinois;
No. AS Ce3lr Street COMPANY appellant vs..
Park Really CIupany; appeal from the Circuit
Court Of the UnteG States for the Southern district
Of New York;
No 10. Lewis W Jared. appellant. vs. The
American Aultigraph Company ct al: appeal from
the Circuit Court of the United States for the
Northern district Of Ohio;
No. 4S. Joseph Z. Gay. appellant, The
Baltic Mining Company ct al. appeal frm the
Circuit Court of the United States for the District
Of Massachusetts,;
No. 43l. Percy H Br1ndage, appellant vs.
Broadway Realty Company ct al; appeal from the
CirrIt Court Of the United States for the Southern
district Of New York;
No. 81 PaIl LAcroix. appellant vs.. Motor Taxi
meter Cab Company It al appeal frUm the Circuit
Court OF the United States for the Southern district
of New York;
No. H. Arthur Lyman ct al. as trustees &c
appellants. vs.. The IntErbCrUugh Rapid Transit
CCmpany ct al; appeal frm the Circuit Court Of
the United States for the Southern district Of New
York;
No. 4s George Wendell Phillips. appellant -
Fifty Associates. ct al: appeal from the Circuit
Court of the United States for the District OF
Massachusetts:
No. 4s6. Oscar Mitchell appellant. vs.. Clark
Iron Company et al; appeal from the Circuit
Court Of the United States for the District Of
Minnesota;
No. 4B. William F. Fluhrpr ct al. appellants.
vs. New York Life Insurance Company: appeal
from the Circuit Court OF the United States for
the Southern district Of New York: and
No. 45'. Katherine Cary Cook ct al. &c. ap-
pellants. Boston Wharf Company ct al: appeal
from the Circuit Court of the United States for
the District of Massachusetts,; dcCrees affirmed with
costs. Opinion by Mr.. Justice Day.
No. f8 AmOry Eliot. appellant " James F.
Freeman ct al: APPEAL from the Circuit Court Of
the United States for the District Of Massaclru-
No. fo6. Maine Baptist Missionary Convention
appellant. Charles f. Cotting ct al. trustees.
&c: appeals from the Circuit Court Of the United
States for the District Of Massachusetts,; dccrees
reversed with costs and causes rrmanded with di-
rcctions tn Overrule the demurrers and for fur
thcr proceedings consistent With the opinion Of
this court Opinion by Mr.. Justice Day.
No. 6E. Any T. Zonnc appellant. vs. The
Minneapolis Syndicate ct al: appeal from the
Circuit Court Of the United States for the District
Of Minnesota deCTTp reversed with costs and cause
remandcd with directions to CycrruIc the demurrer
lirr yy+ r01yr
Of this court Opinion by Mr.. Justice Day.
No. 5ei The United States. 0ctItoncr. The
Atchison. Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company:
on wit Of ccTtIuTari to the United States Circuit
Court of Appeals for the seventh circuit: jldE-
ment affirmed and ClUSr rrmandcd to the District
Court Of the United States for the Northern dis
triCt Of Illinois. Opinion by Mr.. Justice Holmes.
No. $40. HipoIite EE- Company. claimant. &c.
plaintiff IN error and appellant. The United
States; in error to and anI"al from the District
Court of the United Sta:cs for the Southern dis
t-ict NJ Illinois; decree affirmed. Opinion by Mr.
Justice MCKrnna.
The Chief Justice announced the following orders
o. the court:
No. g. Ada EImira Hirst van SyckeI ct al. ap-
pclIlnts. Juan Jose ArSgaEL ct al. partners
SObrnnS dc EzquiaSa C. al: APPEAL from the Dis
trict Court Of the United States for P0rt" Rico
Fer cIram: Dismissed for want If jurisiiCt0n.
81. Louis. Iron Mountain and southern Railroad
Company Express COmTany. lS I. :. y. =:
southern Railway Company Postal Telegraph
Cable Company l7s L. : 6il. 6ii; CoyinCton IS.
United States. 2l7 L. 5. ~ ~.
No. 9n Ira Perryman. by q. II. Pcr-man. his
next friend. plaintiff in crr0r. Thomas W.
Coleman jr. Judge, &c: in CrTUr to the supreme
missed for Of jurisdiction. Mutual Life In
surance Company yS. Mctircw. ISS L. $. 81. GS.
Farrell Us. O'RriPn. 1913 L. :. 100; Kaufman
Ferris, 2l6 L. S. $40.
No. 9l Jesse Nichols. plaintiff in c7Tor. Us. The
City of Cleveland: in error to the supreme Court
Of the State Of Ohio. Per curlam: Dismissed for
want Of jurisdiction. Great Western Telegraph Com
rany vs. BurnhIm. l62 L. 5. ~. 3il: SchlOaSer vs.
Hemphil l9S [. :. l73.
No. 81 Box Elder Power and Light Company.
plaintiff in crrnr. vs. Brigham City; in error tn
the Supreme Court Of the State Of Utah. Fer
cIriam: Dismissed for want Of jurisdiction Mutual
Life Insurance Company vs. MctirCw. lSS L. :.
29l. as; Farrell vs.. O'Brcn. la9 L. ). 100; kauf-
man vs.. Ferris. 2l6 L. s. go
No So. The Home for Destitute Children ct al.
appellants The Peter Bent Brigham Hospital
ct al. trustees. &c; appeal from the Circuit Court
missed for want Of jurisdiction. Farrell vs.. O'Rrcn.
l99 [. s 100; Kaufman Ferris. 2l6 L. s. 6l0
No Bi. Frank II. Waskcy ct al. petitioners, ~
Joseph Hammers. Ct al: and.
No 46i Frank II. WaSkcy. petitioner, J. J.
Chambers; motions to dismiss denied
No. 75S The United States Of America rel
Herman Knight. plaintiff in error. Richard \.
Ballingcr. Secretary Of the Department Of the In
terror; motion to dismiss affirm postponed to the
hearing of the cause on its merits.
No SIS. Carl Adamson. petitioner. vs.. The
United States; petition for a writ of cnrtlOrln TO
the United States Circuit Court Of Appeals for the
Eighth circ1t denied.
No. s97. Malnda Tanner. petitioner, vs.. William
II. Murphy ct al and
No s9s. William II. Shea et al. petitioners.
William H. Murphy ct al; petitions for writs Of
certiorari to the United States Circlit Court Of
Appeals for the Eighth circrit denied.
Order. 1t is ordered by the court that the pro
visions Of rule 81 Of the rules Of this shall
apply to all records to he printed provided in
the act Of Congress entitled AN act to diminish
the expense Of proceedings on appeal and writ II
The Chief Justice also announced that the court
will take recess from Monday. March 20. TO Mon
day. April )
No. 9iI Lefbel Pinc1sov Glucksman. appellant.
vs. William Henkel. United States marshal &c ct
al. Motion to advance submitted BY Mr.. Charles
Dushkind for the appellant
No. 9l. W. II. COyle, plaintiff in error.
Thomas Z. Smith. secretary Of state Of the State
Of Oklahoma ct al motion 10 advance submitted
by Mr.. John H Bunord for the plaintiff in error.
No. 81 The Baker transportation Company. pc
titioner, The steam tug John Z. Hughes &c:
petition for a writ Of cTtiOran to the United
States Circuit Court Of Appeals for the Second cir
CzIit submitted by Mr.. De Langel Berier and Mr..
James ]. Macxlin for the petitioner. and by Mr..
James Emerson Carpenter and Mr.. Samuel Park
for the respondent
No. 9O5. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Com
pany appellant, Adam T. Siler ct al motion
to advance submitted by Mr.. Henry L. Stone for
the appellant.
No. 5g6. Globe Printing Company. Of st. Louis.
plaintiff in crror. vs.. Samuel 3. Cook: motion TO
dismiss affirm submitted by Mr.. John II. At
wood for the defendant in error in support at the
notion and by Mr.. Edward G. CrUS and Mr.
Hannis Taylor for the plaintiff in error. in op
position theFeto.
No ln2 PYincente Garcia Gavieres plaintiff in
error. vs.. The United States; submitted by the
plaintiff in error pro Sc and by Mr.. Assistant At