The Eureka sentinel. [volume] (Eureka, Nev.) 1902-current, 1911-07-01

transportation for trial from Washoe
County to Eureka County. was COM
pleted in the Supreme Court yesterday
and the arguments in support Of the
application for the ~perpetuation Of the
writ of habeas corpus were also
finished. As in the previous day. the
air in the courtroom was charged with
the electricity of sensation, both as
the result of the new testimony and
arguments, and as the result of a
peculiar misrepresentation Of Judge
Glynn, counsel for Smith, who created
something of a furry by denying the
Journals report of the previous days
proceedings.
After the noon recess, when the
Journal arrived in Carson. Judge Glynn
rose in court and referred to the
Journals report Of the proceedings had
on the previous day. He seemed to
labor under the idea that he was said
to have charged Judge Breen with
being o party to an alleged "con-
~spiracy."
81 want to say and I want the record
to show it," said Judge Glynn, THAT
1 made no such statement and that
the record will prove it."
Judge Brown, who is on the other
side, then said that he was sorry the
Journal reporter was not present, for be
would like to see Judge Glynn's state
ment put in the paper. He added that
the reporter must certainly have misin-
terpreted Judge Glynn's remarks.
Here a slight tiff arose as to whether
Judge Glynn's remarks were subject to
misinterpretation and as to whether
there wal any particular significance IN
the form of either Judge Glynn's re.
marks or those of Judge Brown. 1t did
not develop much.
Chief Justice Sweeney then addressed
Judge Glynn and stated that he
(Glynn) was at perfect liberty to bring
before the court any Misrepresentation
made by the paper.
Judge Brown then explained that he
appeared in the cas- at the request OF
the Attorney General, and he said
further that Judge Breen was a hot.
headed and impulsive man and while
he might have said something about the
case. he Judge Breen) had at one time
announced that he would not hear the
Smith case because he was biased
against Smith.
That ended the incident for the time
beng, but afterwards when the Journal
reporter was present, and at the con
ciusion Of the argument, Judge Glynr
said
"Now / see that the Journal reporter
is present and / would like to have him
explain why it is stated that l charged
Judge Breen with conspiracy"
The reporter. who was not fully in.
formed as to the nature of the dispute,
arose and inquired if the court desired
W R<knAt hAh w nAaAe o ~
that time.
The three Judges conferred for a
moment and then Judge Sweeney an
nounced that if Judge Glynn had any
dispute with the reporter, he could
hold it out Of court. but he announced
further that il the proceedings of the
court had been misrepresented that
could be presented to the court in the
usual way. So the reporter sat down
After court adjourned Judge Glynni
still laboring under his misapprehen'
sion, again spoke of the matter. but
when be was shown q copy of the
Journal and told to read it carefully
he acknowledged that he had beer
hasty in his action and had gained
mistaken idea Of just what had beer
reported. Later he wrote out the ex'
PLANTATION which appears in another
column.
The evidence in court in the morning
was not so sensational as promised fol-
the reason. apparently, that much o
1t was excluded on account OF being
hearsay. Charles German. who wa