Pine Bluff daily graphic., 1911-03-30

uot talk and tried to hide myself ous could not. He refused to give me m l. nev to return home on or to give fne lnt leturn tickets so that 1 could Is. turn. After he had got over his tar- tl nm he insisted that I should go on Wg trip. I never mentioned this but as soon as he lad an op- DOT tunity he told some ladies that were on the car of this transaction and tried to throw all of the blame upon me. I was not jealous of the plaintiff and the lady with whom he sat, and tried ill every way that 1 could after we returned to Pine Bluff to make amends for what had occur red, so far as my conduct was con- cerned and my manifest unhapp;ness, and treated her as my best friend and invited her to my house. She came and we exchanged visits"
 After denying that she created a scene in New York, the defendant says: @7'he plaintiff phoned me { meet him at Wanamaker's Corner in New York City, and ill compliance with his request went to that corner expecting to find him, but he did not appear and ] waited for twenty min- N1fa S,NnG hn of 1u standing, waiting and walking up and down on this corner and in the pres ence of throngs of people attracted tlnsair attention and they stared at me and no dcubt thought strangely of me 1e my great humiliation and mortifi- ca ion and when the plaintiff did ec2ge~ l sad to him, Dr. Hankison, you asked me to meet you here in a half an hour and ycn Were rot here. and he said Why Gid you nUt come irfside? I told h1m that he told me to meet hi on the corner and he just laughed a5nut it. I admit that W ,s rerplexed, mortified and 'annoyei on account of his not fulfilling hts Drt : mise in that regard but he matter rassed off in the way staten and was thought no more of by me"
 Sine denies the charges of plaintiff in which he relates Cf an incident be- tween Pine Bluff and Jonesbo!9 where he charges his wife told hia1 to ,''come here and si1 with your wife, this is your place. yotl have uo bus mess being anywhere else " and that she upbraided him, charging him with neglect and being a fool. The trif referred to above, says the defendant
 $ the same one referred to in the para graph of the complaint anA all that transp;reu at that time is gelat- ed above by her. She denied anat she ever called him a fool and says she never used language of that tzand
 She denies that she ever reproached the plaintiff for not caring as much for her mother, sisters or brother, ro1 not doing as much for +tfsem as he should. She never asked him to aio them financially. This was not ne- cessary, she says, &s he always ap- peared to like them and everything that he did for them was voluntary on his part without request or sofic!ta- tion on her part. She frequently asked him not to do as much for them ;as he was doing. Her brother, she charges, never asked assistance ol support from him.
 She denies that she ever upbraided him Or sco1ded the plaintiff for not us- ing the proper tact in tarking to his patients. But she charges that once and only once during her married lie did she ever speak to him about rfle way he talked to his patients. A patient called him over the phone and he said. Well. have you not taken that medicine? An answer came back which she did not hear. Again he said: "Why in the he'll haven't you taken that medicine, damn it, can't you read?" After he concluded the con versation defendant says she said !: Doctor. you ought to be more care ful in talking to your patients. There gre too many doctors and too many good ones in Pine Bluff and your pa6ients are not going to stand such as this," and he said he thought he got along better when he talked to the mthat way than when he tried to smooth over things. She did not mean to scold him on that occasion and does not believe that he so un- derstood her.
 She never told him of his short comings. She frequently talked with him of his business affairs. She neV- CT threatened to leave him as charg- ad hut 6opins That ahOlJt the last Of