Little Falls herald. [volume] (Little Falls, Morrison County, Minn.) 1889-1950, 1911-03-24
DISTRICT COURT CASES
Several Are Sentenced
Spring Term Ends
This Week .

Judgment was returned in favor Of
plaintiff in the case of Sigerr Chris
Jefferson ". Peter Narvosen. : g +
Frank Doechka was found guilty Of
slander agajnst Helen Smeja BY the
jury last Friday morning, but sentence
was suspended npon defendants pay:
Plaintiffs were given Judgment
tor ! $295. ~ against defendants
In the case Of Barbara Wojcie-
chowski ana Martin Wojciehowski w.
Martin Super, Mike super and Andrew
Super, in which action was brought to
recover on q lan0 deal which was
made in 1907. A stay of thirty days
was granted. L..
A verdict was returned favorable to
the defendants in the case of j. p.
Maler VS.. Robert Roche and HedwiG
Roche, his wife. in which plaintiff
sued for sum which he claimed was
due HIM for WORK.
The jury in tho case of Joseph
Otremba VS.. Matt Thommes. which
case had been appealed from the JUS
tice court. reduced judgment against
defendant tor SIS to only $5 for DAM
ages done by the formers hogs on the
latter's premises, and costs assessed to
plaintiff This completed the jury
cases before this term of the district,
court.
The two cases of the state
against Thomas ~Bieijew ski were con-
tinued to the next general term OF
court. ID
Mary Lorig was granted degree OF
divorce from her husband, John
Joseph Lorig, by the court at the Mon
day evening session, on the grounds OF
cruel and inhuman treatment.
Jacob Ouscher appeared before the
district court Wednesday and pleaded
for the leniency of the court. A
sentence of imprisonment in the
county Jail for sixty days and IN addi'
ton pay all the costs of the case,
was imposed on him 40 punibhment
for the crime of assault in the third
degree OF which he was convicted last
week. He is now serving time.
The case OF State of Minnsota upon
the relation of John B. Gillette sr:
and Eugenia Odette va the Town OF
Ripley, an action to compel defendant
to support the couple, came up IN
district court Tuesday. rho couple
claimed that they had decided their
land to the Town of Ripley as part
payment for their support Tho case
Is to be argued by the attorneys: and,
briefs submitted to the oo1rt 49,. -,
The case Of Henry Janish .vs. =. w.
Patton, =. controversy over sland, iesta
be submitted on briefs y P1ainti& &sh3d;
k~~ 4Holn mo
Patton. paying >600 down, bat before
the deed was given h1m Mr.. Patton
died and the matter OF deciding the
land to plaintiff was left over until
the property was probated. As he
was adverse to this waiting he
brought SUIT to recover the amount
paid on the land.
Judgment was granted plaintiff in
the case Of Anton Kan1eski as ad-
ministrator of the estate of Simon
Kanleski and Anton kanieskl vs..
Ignatz Kanieski, another land case.
Mary Gotta was granted a decree of
divorce from her husband, Frank
Gotta.
The case of Joseph Porten VS..
Common School District No. 10 of
Morrison county was tried Wednes-
day, this being an action to recover
for wages said to be due him for
experimenting the work Of building
a school house. 1t was taken under
Amusement.
The case of Frank b. Ginter vs.. 0.
H. Havill, in which plaintiff claf1nefi
he mad paid q emorgago hela by de-
fendant on has LAND, was dism issed
Wednesday, after occupying the atten-
tion of the court tho entire afternoon.
The case of Joseph Porten vs.. Mar:
tin w. WOJciechowski. in which
plalntiff attempted to forecloee lien
for work, done tor defendant, was also
taken under advlsement