davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-03-10

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington for the County
of King. Summons
w r.. Augustine, plaintiff, VS.. Dora
Augustine, defendant.-No 1921.
The State of Washington, to said Dora
Augustine, defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days from the date of the
first publication of this summons, that
is to say, within sixty days from the
Goth day of January, 1911. and defend
the above entitled action in the above
entitled court and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your
answer upon the undersigned attorney
for the plaintiff at his office below
stated; and in case of your failure so
to do, judgment will be rendered against
you according to the demands of said
complaint, which has heretofore been
filed with the clerk of said court.
The object of said action is to obtain
an absolute divorce from the bond of
matrimony heretofore existing between
yourself and the said plaintiff, said
divorce being asked upon the ground of
abandonment.
LEOPOLD M. STERN,
Attorney for Plaintiff
Office and postoffce address,
705 Lowman Building
Seattle, Washington.
Jan. 20-March 8, 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-03-10

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. STATE
of Washington, in and for the County
of King.
Coon, Defendant. No. 77713. Summons
for Publication.
The State of Washington, to the said
Ida N. Coon, Defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty (60) days after the date of
the first publication of this Summons, to-
wit: within sixty (60) days after the
23rd day of December, 1910, and defend
the above entitled action in the above
entitled court, and answer the complaint
answer upon the undersigned attorney
for Plaintiff, at his office below stated;
and in case. of your failure SO to do,
judgment will be rendered against you
according to the demands of the COM
plant, which has been filed with the
clerk of said court.
The object for which this action Is
brought is to obtain a decree of divorce
from the Defendant, upon the following
grounds:
Because the Defendant, without Plain
tiffs fault, has been guilty of personal
indignities to such an extent as to rem
der Plaintiffs life burdensome; said per-
sonal indignities consisting of frequent
quarrelS upon the part of the Defendant
towards the Plaintiff and also that the
defendant frequently and often called
plaintiff bad and vile names, abused him
and threw dishes at him and threw
Dishes around the room and broke them
and tried in every way possible to make
life unpleasant for plaintiff.
A. ]. SPECKERT,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
P. Q. Address: Fourth Ave, Between
Pike and Pine Streets, Second Floor
Stevens Academy, Seattle, Washing
ton.
Dec. 23, 1910-Feb. 8, 1911
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-03-10

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
state of Washington, for King Coun-
ty. Summons by Publication.
Edwin R. Burlington, plaintiff, VS.. J. b;
The State of Washington to B. Cook
and Mabel Cook his wife, defendants.
In the name of the State OF WASH
ington You are hereby SUMMONED 70
appear within sixty days after the date
of the first publication of this summons
fo-Wit: within sixty days from and after
the gath day of February, 1911, eX-
elusive of said first date, and detend
the above entitled action in the above
of the plaintiff, and serve a copy OF
your answer upon the undersigned the
attorney fer the plaintiff, at his ofhce
below stated; and in case or your ran
ure to do so, judgment will be rendered
against you according to the demand OF
the complaint which has been filed with
the clerk of the above entitled court,
The object of the said action set forth
in the complaint is as follows: TO re-
Cook and wife for $4,000, with interest,
costs, charges, attorneys fees mem
toned in note and mortgage recorded
in Vol. 1886, Mortgages, page Ego. Rec5
to divest defendants of all interest in
the premises therein described and quiet
title thereto and general relief; SAID
property is described as north 10 rect
lot g. and south rs feet lot 10, block
is. Maynard's Lake Washington Addi-
ton to Seattle, King County, Washing
ton, as per recorded plat; -1,o,
FRANK B. WRESTLING.
Attorney for Plaintiff.
Postoffice address 202 Fern Block
Seattle, King County, Washington.
First date of publication February "a,
Feb. 14-April 7, 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-03-10

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, in and for King
County.
Plaintiff, VS.. D. c. Brownell and F. w.
Winters, doing business as Hotel Cor
lew, and Mrs. Gertrude Corlew and
John Doe Corlew, her husband, whose
true Christian name is unknown, De-
PENDANTS. No. -. Summons by Pub
LEGATION.
The State of Washington To the de-
PENDANTS, Mrs. Gertrude .Corlew and
John Doe Corlew, her husband, whose
true Christian name is unknown, De-
PENDANTS
You and each of you are hereby sum-
moned to appear within sixty (60) days
after the date of the first publication of
this summons to-wit: within sixty days
after the 23rd day of December, 1910,
and defend the above entitled action in
the above entitled court and answer the
complaint Of the plaintiff and serve a
copy of your answer on the undersigned
attorneys for the plaintiff at their office
below stated and in case of your failure
so to do judgment will be rendered
against you according to the demand of
the complaint which has been filed with
the clerk of said court. The object of
this action is to recover the possession
of certain goods wares and merchandise
sold by the plaintiff the defendants Cor
lew and wife under a conditional sale
due of s595.75, together with interest
at the legal rate from the 7th day of
October, 1910, or the value Of said goods,
if same can not be returned, and that
the plaintiff has had issued out of this
cause and court writ of attachment
and has levied in certain property of the
defendants in this county, to-wit: Lot
Five 60, in Block Three CD of G. p.
Stones Home Addition to the city Of
F. ], CARVER & JOHN sLATTERY,
Attorneys for Plaintiff
314 Northern Bank & Trust Building
Seattle. Washington,
Dec. %, 1910-Feb. 8, 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-03-10

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington for King County.
Notice of Application to Adopt VALID
ron Ward Gordon.
In the Matter of the Application of
T.. M. Richards and Sarah Richards,
his wife, to adopt the minor child
of William Gordon and Mary Gordon,
deceased.
The petition of f. NJ Richards, and
Sarah Richards, his wife, to adopt the
minor child of William Gordon and
Mary Waldron Gordon, deceased, has
been FLED in the above entitled court,
praying said court for an order of adop-
ton OF said minor;
Wherefore, in the name of the state
of Washington, said William Gordon,
and all other persons concerned are
hereby notified to file in said court their
objection, if any, to such adoption, on
or before the Both day of March, 1911.
Dated this 10th day of March, 1911.
e. w. HOWELL,
Attorney for Petitioners.
342 New York Block.
March 1O-March II, 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-03-10

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King Coun-
ty. Summons by Publication.
M. H. Ring, plaintiff, VS.. c. e. Remsberg,
as executor of the last will and tesla
lnent of George e. Hail. deceased; c..
q. Remsberg, and Jane Doe" Rems-
berg, his wife, whose true given name
is to plaintiff unknown; Fremont State
Bank Charles ]. Clark, Seattle Coal
& Wood Company, a corporation; HUI
p Hall, Joseph f. Hall, Lucy Irene
Hall Leach and Carrie G. Hall, de-
fendants.-No. 1856.
The State of Washington to Charles P.
Hall, Joseph e. Hall, Lucy Irene Hall
Leach and Carrie G. Hall, defendants
above named:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication Of this summons, to-
wit: within sixty days after the oath
day of February, 1911, and defend the
above entitled action in the above en-
plant of the defendants c. e. Rems-
berg and "Jane Doe Remsberg, his wife,
and Fremont State Bank, and serve
a copy of your answer upon the under
signed attorneys for cross compliments
at their offices below stated, and in case
of your failure SO to do judgment will
be rendered against you according to
the demands of the cross complaint.
which has been filed with the clerk of
this court. The object of the action
tate mentioned and described in the cross
HUMPHREYS & COLE,
Attorneys for Cross Compliments G.
e. Remsberg, Jane Doe" Rems-
berg and Fremont State Bank.
Seattle. King County. Washington.
Feb. 24-April 7, 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-03-10
NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND STOCK
HOLDERS OF CAMEL COAL co.
OF WASHINGTON.


To the creditors and stockholders of the
Camel Coal Company Of Washington,
corporations:
You, and each of you, will please take
notice that on Saturday. the 18th of
March. 1911, at the office of said Com
pany, No. 314 Colman Building in the.
City of Seattle Washington, at the hoI
of 2 o'clock P. M, or as soon thetN
after as said matter may be taken up,
there will be held meeting of the
Camel Coal Company of Washington,
for the object and purpose of reducing
the capital stock of said Cannal Coal
Company of Washington, a corporation,
from five hundred thousand dollars
($500, 000), which is it's present capital
ization, to the amount of one hundred
thousand dollars ($100,000).
You are hereby notified to be present
at such meeting to cast your vote upon
said subject or present such objections
as you may have to any such reduction
of capital stock aforesaid
Dated at Seattle, King County, Wash
ington, this 7th day of January, 1911.
D. B. TREFETHEN,
ANDREW KENNEDY,
LOREN GRINSTEAD,
Majority of Board of Trustees of Can
mel Coal Company Washington.
Jan. 13-March 10, 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-03-10
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
state of Washington, for King Coun-

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King Coun-
Isabella Badere Plaintiff, VS.. Frederick
Badere, Defendant. No.. sum
mons by Publication.
The State of Washington to the said
Defendant Frederick Badere:
You are hereby summoned and re-
uuired to appear within sixty days after
the date of the first publication of this
summons, to-wit: within sixty days art
er the third day of March, 1911, and
defend the above entitled action in the
above entitled court and answer the
complaint of the plaintiff herein, and
serve a copy of your answer upon the
undersigned attorney for plaintiff at the
address below stated and in case OF your
failure so to do, judgment will be rem
dered against you, according to the de-
mand of the complaint herein, which
has been filed with the clerk of this
court. ~,
The object of this action is to dis
solve the bonds of matrimony now eX-
listing between plaintiff and defendant
upon the grounds of cruelty and failure
of defendant to support plaintiff.
EDWARD Won TOBEL,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
Office and Post Office Address: Rooms
6O3-5 Mutual Life Bldg, Seattle, King
County, Washington.
March April A. 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-03-10
Seattle, Wash, January 10, 1911.

Seattle. Wash, January 49, 1911.
Notice is hereby given that the second
annual meeting of the stockholders of
the Alaska Northern Railway Company
said company, at room 1917 of the
Alaska Building, on Second Avenue, Sc
attic, Washington on Tuesday, the 14th
day of March, A. D. 1911, at two o'clock
in the afternoon of said day.
JAMES A, HATGHT,
Secretary of the Alaska Northern Rail-
way Company
Jan. 27-Feb. "a, 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-03-10

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, STATE
of Washington, in and for the County
of King.
Franklin f. Gongleski, Plaintiff, VS.. Eva
GonglesH Defendant.-No. 77713.
Summons for Publication.
The State of Washington, to the said
Eva Gongleski, Defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty 600 days after the date of
the first publication of this Summons,
to-wit: within sixty 600 days after the
18th day of February 1911, and defend
the above entitled action in theabove
entitled court. and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff and serve a copy of
your answer upon the undersigned at
torney for Plaintiff, at his office below
stated; and in case of your failure so
to do, judgment will be rendered against
you according to the demands of the
complaint, which has been filed with
the clerk of said court.
The object for which this action is
brought is to obtain a decree of divorce
from the Defendant, upon the grounds
of wilful desertion for more than one
year. gross neglect of duty and extreme
cruelty.
Z. R. SHIRRAN,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
P. o Address: 1928 Epler-McDonald
Block, Seattle, Washington.
First publication February 18th, 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-03-10
FRIDAY March 10, 1911

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
state OF Washington, for King Coup
ty. Notice of Sale of Real Estate.
In the Matter of the Estate of Elaine
K. Oderkirk deceased.-No. 1863.
Notice is hereby given that under and
by virtue of an order of sale in the
ington, for King County, dated Decem-
Der 8, 1909, 1 will sell at private sale
the following described real estate stu
atgd ii in e kng CSpnt 5oN Wash 1a won
ster's Madison Street Addition to the
Also lot six ts}, and the north forty
(14), Yesler's Second Addition to the
City of Seattle, King County, Washing
ton.
18th day of March, A. D. 1911. BIZ
will be received by the undersigned, a.
his office, No. GOA Mutual Life Building,
Seattle, King County, Washington.
United States, 10 per cent of bid to ac-
company bid. balance to be paid upon
continuation of sale by court.
Dated this 18th day of February, 1911.
EDWARD Won TOBEL,
Administrator de bonis non of the Es-
tate of Elaine K. Oderkirk, de-
ceased.
Feb. 24-April "a, 1911.
STATE OF WASHINGTON, FOR THE
County of King.
Margaret Brooks, plaintiff, VS.. William
S. Brooks, defendant.
The State of Washington, to the said
William S. Brooks:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication of this summons, to-wit:
Within sixty days after the Gath day of
February, 1911, and defend the above en-
titled action in the above entitled court,
and answer the complaint of the plain
tiff, and serve copy of your answer up
on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff,
at his office below stated; and in case
of your failure SO to do, judgment will
be rendered against you according to the
demand of the complaint, which has been
filed with the clerk of said court.
The object of the above entitled action
is to obtain a decree of divorce on the
grounds of abandonment and non-sup-
port.
JAS. M. EPLER,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
Office: 320-321 Epler Block, Seattle,
Washington.
Feb. 24-April Z, 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-03-10


The State of Washington to Fred B.
Jewell and Emma ]. Fair, defendants:
You and each of you are hereby sum-
moned to appear within sixty (60) days
after the date of the first publication
of this summons, to-wit, within sixty
days after the 18th day of January, 1911,
and defend the above entitled action in
the above entitled court and answer the
complaint of the plaintiff and serve a
copy of your answer upon the under
signed attorneys for plaintiff at their
office below stated; and in case of your
failure so to do, judgment will be rem
dered against you according to the de-
mand of the complaint which has been
filed with the clerk of said court The
object of this action is to foreclose a
chattel mortgage on white mare known
as Babe" a sorrel horse known as
'Dick." and two delivery wagons.
F. j. CARVER and JOHN SLATTERY,
Attorneys for Plaintiff.
314-15-16 Northern Bank &c Trust Co..
Bldg, Corner Pike and Westlake, Sc
attic, King County Washington.
Jan. FEB. "a, 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-03-10

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington. in and for the
County of King. 60 Day Summons.
Ella Won Wasmer plaintiff. VS.. j. D.
Hendricks, sometimes known as and
written John d. Hendricks, and Min
ME Hendricks, his wife; and Joe Slat-
ton and Jane Doe Station, his wife,
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-03-10

IN THE JUSTICES COURT BEFORE
Fred c. Brown. Justice of the Peace,
Seattle Precinct, King County. WASH
ington. Summons for Publication.
The Bee Hive Store, a corporation vs.
State Of Washington, County of King, SIS.
The State of Washington to George j.
You are hereby notified that The Bee
Hive Store. corporation: has n g t 1n ia
said court, which will come on to- be
heard st ny ofe sea in rooR R6 sol cGsntg
Washington. on the 5th day of April,
3 Sll at a6 the n9ur s of ' then a. and
there answer. the same will be taken
granted. The object and demand or SAID
Complaint is to recover Nineteen and
S4-1oO ($19S4) Dollars due for gro
ceries. ,o,.
FRED C. BROWN,
Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle
Precinct, King County, Washington.
March 4-March 81, 1911.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-03-10

State of Washington, in and for King
County. Summons by Publication.
Oscar E. Jensen & Co., Inc, plaintiff, VS..
Fred B. Jewell and Emma j. Fair, de-
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-03-10
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King Coun-
ty. Notice and Summons.
Aurora Land Company, corporation,
plaintiff, VS.. Unknown Owners, and
all persons unknown, if any, having
or claiming an interest in and to the
hereinafter described real property,
defendants.-No. -.
State of Washington to the above de-
PENDANTS and each of them:
You and each of you, as owners,
claimants or holders of an interest or
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-03-10

Send your legals to The Seat
tie Republican, APT Epler Blk.
Phone Main 305.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-03-10

fendants.-No. -.
The State of Washington to Fred B.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-03-10

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King Coun-
ty. Summons by Publication.
The State of Washington, to the said
Harry Henton, defendant:
Peter E. Brown, plaintiff, vs. Harry Hen
ton, defendant.-No. 1898.
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date OF the
first publication of this summons, to-
wit: within sixty days after the 10th
day of March, 1911, and defend the above
entitled action in the above entitled
court, and answer the complaint of the
plaintiff, Peter E. Brown, and serve a
copy of your answer upon the under
signed attorney for the plaintiff at his
office below stated; and In case of your
failure so to do judgment will be rem
dered against you according to the de-
mand of the complaint which has been
filed with the clerk of said court.
The object of the action is to set aside
and cancel a certain deed bearing date
June 9th, 1910, filed in said King Coun-
ty and recorded in Volume 744 of Deeds
was induced by fraudulent representa-
tions to convey to said defendant the
west half of southeast quarter of the
southeast quarter of the southwest quar-
ter in Section % of Township rs North,
Range 5 East w. NJ, in King County,
State of Washington. Also cancel and
avoid certain option or contract of sale
between said parties describing said real
property of like date which said agree
ment or option is recorded in said King
County, Washington, in Volume 73S OF
Deeds at page 577 -
r. B. McMARTIN,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
1928 Alaska Bldg, Seattle, King County,
Washington.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1911-03-10

IN JUSTICES COURT BEFORE FRED
C. Brown, Justice of the Peace, in and
for Seattle Precinct, King County
State of Washington, Summons for
Publication.
Georgetown Mercantile Co, a corpora
ton, plaintiff, VS.. G. j. Velzy and Jane
Doe Velzy, his wife, defendants.-No
7710
State of Washington, County of King, S.
The State of Washington to G. j. Velzy
and Jane Doe Velzy, his wife.
You, and each of you, are hereby not1-
Ned that Georgetown Mercantile Co., a
corporation, has filed a SUMMONS naGG soS and
which will come on to be heard at my
office in room sol Prefontaine Building,
Seattle, King County, Washington, on
the 10th day of April, A. D. 1911, at
the hour of $3.50 a. M, and unless you
appear and then and there answer, the
same will be taken as confessed % and til the he
demand of the plaintiff granted. The
object and demand of said complaint is
to recover the total $105S due for gro
ceries and millinery.
Filed March 2, A. d. 1911.
FRED G. BROWN,
Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle
Precinct, King County, Washington.
The evening times. [volume] (Grand Forks, N.D.) 1906-1914, 1911-12-15
FLY FIGHTING
STILL GOES ON
Interesting Paper Before the
Civic Association-Min-
neapolis Garden Club

Washington. Dec. 15.-campaign.
against the fly until the pestilential
insect is exterminated- was recon-
mended in a report made today by
Edward Hatch. Jr.. of New York
chairman of the 'fy fighting" com.
mittee. to the American Civic associa.
tion. in convention here. Mr.. Hatch
tol dof the progress made in wagine
war on the fly as breeder and
spreader of disease.
when the chairman Of the COM
mittee, q few years ago. before the
committee itself had been formed. be.
gan to acquaint the general public
with the danger Of the fly pest" said
Mr.. Hatch. "his efforts excited more
tention. All that is changed now
and a good part Of the change has
been wrought within the past twelve
months.
"Since the last annual conference
on the fly pest, letters have poured
in upon the committee from ali quar-
ters Of the country. asking for advice
the house fly. The committee caused
to be printed and circulated upwards
of 100000 pieces Of literature which
served as ammunition in innumerable
fly swatting campaigns. In a mum.
Der Of cities. school children compel.
ed Tor cash prizes for compositions
which would best describe the fy's
vicious career. In many cities news
papers organized swat the fly con.
tests for considerable cash prizes. The
numbers scored by the winners ran
into the hundreds Of thousands and
the count, ESQ many flies to the quart)
In Baltimore alone reached 15,000,-
900. Washington boys and girls
caught and killed only s.3se, 900; but
Washington can't boast of q really
bumper crop Of flies.
with a view to summing up the
seasons work-taking a dy census al
It were-the committee recently
wrote to the health commissioner
Of the different states. From the re-
plies, It appears Kansas Is In the van
Of the hy.fghting army. The Indiana
board Of health distributed text of the
anti-fiy ordinance and twelve cities
and seventeen towns towns adopted
It. North Dakota reported a mark
ed decrease in the fly population.
Much Ingenuity has been shown by