The Pensacola journal. (Pensacola, Fla.) 1898-1985, 1911-10-20
CIRCUIT COURT
D|SPOSES OF
MANY CASES
WAS A BUSY DAY
AND SEVERAL MATTERS WERE
ADJusTED-MIsTRIAL IN CASE
OF J. n. CRIMSON VS.. CITY OF
PENSACOLA

Judge Wolfe had q busy day yes
terday in the Escambia county circuit
court In session for the fall term.
The following cases were disposed
Of as follows:
J. H Brinson We City Of Pensacola,
action for damage sustained by falling
into q hole in sidewalk, the evidence
mitted to the jury who, after remain
ing out eight hours could not agree
on q verdict, and made q mistrial
Gulf. Florida and Alabama Railroad
Company vs A. J. johnson and R H.
Tier, condemnation Of land The Svi-
dence was concluded, case argued and
submitted to the jury, who, last night
had not rendered q verdict
Louis Boley VIZ Henry Albums, eject
ment jury empaneled and rendered
consent verdict for plaintiff.
Louis Boley We Mandy Elliott, eject
ment, consent verdict for defendant.
Louis Boley We Hezekiol Bowley,
etectment, consent verdict for plaintiff.
Louis Boley vs Allen Potter, ejsctment
consent verdict for defendant
Louis Boley vs. Dave Anderson,
eJectment. consent verdict for plaintiff.
Louis Boley vs. Nathan Robinson,
ant.
Louis Boley vs. Henry Fountain,
ejectment, consent verdict for plaintiff.
Louis Boley VS. Tom Hayes, eject
ment, consent verdict for plaintiff.
Louis Boley VS. Burrow Wingate,
ejectment, consent verdict for plaintiff
Louis Boley Va w. r D. Potter.
ejectment, consent verdict for defend
ant
Louis Boley VS. Sam Campbell. eject
ment, consent verdict for defendant.
Louis Boley vs. Fraul Potter, eject
ment. consent verdict for defendant
Louis Boley VS. Fannie James, eject
ment, consent verdict for defendant.
In addition to matters disposed of in
open court, the following orders were
made In chambers:
c. w. Richardson VS. W. H. Faux,
action for damages for breach of con-
cision without a jury, case considered,
and on the law and facts, verdict and
judgment was awarded in favor of
plaintiff, In the sum of $500.
Mary J. Henderson VS. Nelson Hen
derson, bill for divorce: Evidence ex-
amined and found insufficient, decree
signed denying the divorce and dis
missing the bill of complaint.
Mary M. and J. N. Helton, VS. Lewis
Bear Company, bill for special relief:
Respondents demurrer to the bill of
complaint, overruled with leave to an
swer within fifteen days.
Grace Bell VS. Alexander Bell, bill for
divorce: The demurrer of the respond
ent to the bill Of complaint was con-
sidered and the demurrer sustained,
with leave to complainant to amend
her bill on, or before November 9Th,
1911.
Georgia Pencodetal VS. N. 2. PEN
codetal, ejectment: The demurrer Of
the plaintiffs, to defendants plea, was
considered and the demurrer overruled
and plea held sufficient.
Laura ]. Berry VS. James Henry Ber-
ry, petition for alimony: The motion
of defendant to discuss the petition
was considered and motion denied.
with leave to defendant to answer the
petition within fifteen days.
Annie McDavid Barber, as Admx. VS.
L. & N. Railroad Company: Motion
to stride parts Of amended declaration
considered and motion denied.
Gulf, Florida and Alabama Railroad
Company, VS. Thos. Newell condemna-
ton Of land: Jury empaneled and rem
dered a consent verdict, fixing the
value of the land taken at $475.