Bismarck daily tribune. [volume] (Bismarck, Dakota [N.D.]) 1881-1916, 1911-04-19
complete REPORT OF THE
ARGUMENT Regarding THE
PROPOSED ADJOURNMENT
Full Text of Debate as Taken Down
by the Stenographers

consider question continuing
have been informed by Mr. Bangs for the respondent that they expected
finish about days.
got along nicely yesterday
think ought to finish
Prcsiden $ objection proceed
George Bangs: prepared up
day after
Mr.. President: Can for witnesses now:
Mr. George Bangs We conducting Investigations right along
this progressing rapidly trouble
and letters telephone and the telegraph There
discrepancies that be looked have
the incident Rugby incident They given
r could not understand the by the witnesses
reference beginning
would impossible witnesses day after show
the condition. that would be impossible do With reference
the Lakoa incident beginning the trouble with that have
explained partly DETAIL the situation have
before and this time this has
far the board Of concerned rapidly As has been nd
statements made by the respondent we found that the CON-
micc which taking the testimony
the respondent We could absolutely information
nature description We couldn't the memoranda Of the testimony
taken could absolutely nothing from them. started
9TH day of March with nothing whatever before
reports in the and the articles of impeachment That
everything had with this 9Th of
March, There specifications I
vovng something like thrix different isolated instances
them ITSELF The eighth charge contained that making
seventytwo there addition which there
specified making something like total hundred and
for investigation by only the Second Judicial District
tered the absolutely
until something like the 10th day March, did the best
could and prepared the the best possibly could the limited time
had to it, but of the devoted
determination of the facts themselves and where the of
who testify might applied
blank which felt authorized procedure
which also caused delay and half of the that behalf
of the prosecution and board Of by the
board of myself until had
cent had never been until after they reached Bismarck
The absolutely nvesga-
by
and another afternoon
get the library
OF the law this
be- exactly would
all Ridiculous force the board argument
matter short of least four five days. feel would be simply redcu
ous to force of this testimony
that is this and feel they
do less i'll view of the facts stated them continue this
" o" or ve days. this time or as soon as respondent closes his
opportunity investigate least the legal propositions
voed call attention extraordinary condition in this
case which has been referred There mteposd
objection to the jurisdiction of this argued disposed
CT at the time We have been assured by respondent
one OF the subjects be by the respondent when this
ter for final will be the question of jurisdiction
this despite the fact jus
d'con We have had time since the former look
law this question: you
the jurisdiction of this suggested
Stark and also by counsel for that charge containing
specifications of which three have been eliminated
peachabe oaenses Now recall that this board of did
articles of impeachment but
18th day of February and the date of the adoption
the 3rd day Of March, and recall correctly
days and perhaps half during which
attention at least of that period
single authority ubanate the charge charge
constitute Improbable ofense and they
of the sincerity this Senate that to bring on at
that time involving the uency specifications
charge without opportunity afforded the board Of
that investigation would proceedings
than farce Again the language
too clear to bear minerpetatn that charge relating drug
stores does constitute impeacable forget
language but he announced the doctrine right
judge, while holding the Office of Judge, participate the
Of improbable oense it was not msde
office maifeasnce Office That
disposed Of long
Charge and the drug disposed
it. bv an
argument the tail end this without
rules adopted by this Senate board
which to this The respondent will then
advance these then managers
expected to close hours
the reason and the authorities their
apprd of this advance that they expected argue
length So if please the presiding
Senate under the conons
this tme would be- the
respondents would be bring this
the senftl