Albuquerque morning journal. [volume] (Albuquerque, N.M.) 1903-1926, 1910-03-30
CAN THEY FOOL PEOPLE AGAIN?
A Democrats Make No Attempt to Explain
n Increase Of $40 Per Capita ip Tax Rate

s,-e,. rn oa a, = e'a,. n% =. ~ "r . .s economy has increase" "r an" cost
The cy payroll alone has been Increased SO IA per cent
The actual cost ct running the city Is $500 per head or every MAJ
von0n ana cnra m AIouooerme q, ss' nr head mre var y yer
IN n. as IN an their other broken omrnao pledges the democratic
bosses ana me administration attempt no rsponodo"
Following opt this polite. they assert mat mn have reduced the "a.
rn, 40 no aea, ne "a per co seye" in ooemues rApea.e.
III, III Us u.s. per Ger n msrg"' g. IN ~, me r r tn Jump 4" " pr ~"""
m, ues claim 10 have reduced the uz ruc
The lax rate fr general city PURPOSES in tie la ymr OF republican
administration was s7s mills where it had i"e" fr some >eus past This
IL rnr Fn,sr YEAR or runs ADMINISTRATIONS rng rAN
%rls :" = ,saI us07 WAS = =
rms ADMINISTRATIONS DELIBERATELY VIOLATED THE LAW
Asp lAlsEp TlE TAN RATE ron e'rf PURPOSES 90 MILLS
For their second ,ear-lsos it is back to the ~mc Old point sa
RI, tax ra,c in the city records It in the count, records.
be distorted or jugsled. nj Is ucre. We pa, the taxes and ever, time you
GET aoar pa reeopi and put up your sood money. you have reason 70
Every @ss,er in Albuquerque who has visited the county treasurer.
sr'f nn during In tn ,%' sN months N"on- that his ""7 'r e' purposes
10 the sewer
The, carm the, have reduced the pne~i tax rate outside of the
.n Tine ..@. l s'ss @' shown y, Tue record i, mat IA, ., rate or city
e@areao. min. '' '' ""9 ".
.l %n n p@sm@' n m,'g@~ ia revenue Which IN g9 has enjoyed f""
I'M" cold. hard fact shown by the record. Is chat instead OF a de-
,,,@,ss IN ., @' "a ss'ss :, 9' the sx@ dement's %%ys claim We have AZ ArrrAI IS.
lEvtEs "N ACCOUNT OF THE NEW SEWER uoNps
No. only did m' administration exceed tho legal limit in is orsFear
Nt u SHOWS IN THE" second NeHr, Whru 1t gut tck 40 the legal limit. FOR
'A purposes. Al increase of 81 mills over amy previous levy against the
'it~fhN "f his tovn-'NtiH~te of sme sewer bond tN And this N wa
They call decrease of @ per cent n t, uN ntr
N"9 tine aem'"taue administration dd TO- la its hast s,ar-in wild
'na.gg' t." eeoa for IT, e.r''"sm ,seoadfore~ wac to aecrcae w
Hs@3""' Tor rtund'ns bonds Of the old sewer system and u deoruN
"~s"""' mf bonds ir the Cod avenue vaduct tn either words thcse\
assessments were reduced fixed charges wore reduced charges nr pay.
nrnt 81 our ndeht'dnsa were reduved This is what this administration
'm- rigid ro"nom'. 'omr''eui administration ame nnaa.sns~
MA IN spite d" d 'l in spite ~ ue hopping oft OF assessments with
"bFh io are for t" e,s ontsandins inieteln,ss-u the ssesanent for
general city PURPOSES Witch is outside OF Fixed ohrscs and uh,h is the
fund that Interests The tNrmN'r Was. for ee Year OF u, admfoitruion
Z" ap"Nct the limit allowed e2 hw. and b. now whore 10 was befo-, at SIS
mnh
WHILE THE ASSESSMENT RATE FOR THE cry OF hIn--
oCER0UE FOR ALL PtEiDSiS-ENCLUSiNE OF THE NEW SEWER
81 MILLS NntE THAN iT EVER pp mF0RE
rhese feures are taken nom the Records ct the county If rrrmume;
from the "fnhe "f the county treasurer where 81. py ar taxes rheN
sh"" bow this administration. Instead eft reducing ,N taxes as they claim
increased then more thn , mhls-and lmts increased them u.s.
mls oser md above the nuk charge Tor the new sewer bonds.