The Washington herald., 1910-05-17

]
plaintiff in CTrlr; leave granted o. the .oHcitoi
general 20 be heard herein and 10 ale a Lrrf a.
amic7is oIriae.
Nc. e5l The United states. plainua in orror. vs..
No. 60 The United States. piainiis in crror. rs
! LuigI Csiarelli: and
No So The United States. plaintiff u error
W. William A. Duncan. advanced and assigned fsi
/ argument On the nTst Tuesday n the next tenn
I OctCblT ID as one CASE after the cases already
I assigned for that day. and Cne-haf hour allowed
/ each side IN the argument. on motion q lir.
Solicitor General Bowers. Tor the plaintiff IN
No. co William Drsier. plaintiff IN error. ,s-
I Tho United STATES. and
No. 65l. William Dreier appellant. Is. William
/ HUkel. United States marshal. &c; motion % ad
vance submitted by Mr. Solicitor General Bower
/ fcr the defendant in error and appellee.
/ No. 7e Org Chang Wing q al. plaintiff In er-
I ror vs. The United States motion % advance sub
/ mitted Is Mr.. Solicitor General Bowers. FOR the
defendant IN cTrCr
/ Nc. SO Tie United States. petitioner. vs.. The
Atchis0u. Topeka and santa Fe Railway Com
Ianyi motion 10 advance submitted b. Mr.. Solicitor
General Bowers for the petitioner.
Nc. 9l9. The United States OF America. appellant
vs. Lehish VALLEY Railrcad Company;
Nc. p. The United States q America. appellant.
W Ere Railroad ComTany,
/ Nc. 81 The United States Of America. appellant.
vs. The Central Railroad Company Of Sew Je--
/ sey; and
No. 90. The United States Of America. appellant.
]
/ 90 advance submitted hy Mr.. Solicitor General
/ Bowers. for tie appellant.
No. 81. The United States. rlainfif 10 error. v.
/ Pres FubllLlug Company. motion 90 advance sub
mitted hg Mr.. Solicitor General Bowers. fr the
/ plaintiff IN erT0F.
No. zoo. Northern Pacific Railway Crnr,rv.
plaintiff iu crrsr Bessie B1hcacE as af1irl,-r7-
triX. &c leave 90 file brief herein as am-is r,-lse
aanted. on motion q Mr.. Solicitor General Bowers.
for Tie United State
40 81 Atlantic Coss. Line Railroad Conrsr-.
plaintiff IN error Riverside Mills motion % adj
vance submitted by Air Solicitor General Rg.re-s
/ in hchaf q Alr. Alexander Akemau fo- the de-
fgldart in error; motion f0r leave 90 Dc heard here
lu a. amicIs clriae submitted tv Air Solicitor
| General Bowers. for Tho United States
No go Hipolite Egg Comrarv -Iai-rar--- &c
lALid in errJr and appellant 80. Tic United
States. mcuon 70 advance 7-hmitted t lI-. F. r.
FcrWick for the plaintiff 20 error and appellant
No s5' New York. New Maven and Hartford
Railroad Company. plairuT in error. w. Mary
Agnes Walsh. admiris-rzr-iI. &c. ard
Nc So. Man A--e7 Walsh. atr.irist-.t-iy &c
IiainuH III cT1r. Is. NgT York. New Haven and
Hartford Railroad Company. motion % adrarra rl
he heard with No. 7-. submitted hy lI- John l.
Han fr- The railroad uurday
No II,- Prank W. Brown. APPELLANT rs g. r.
hS>l1I. United States Marshal &c. 90 all motion
tn admit appellant fo bail submitted iF DR. H r.
Woodland and Mr. A A. Bi-rey F-- -hs ar--.1---
with leave 90 t1s Solicitor General % fls Brief il
opposition within five JavS
No. go. Globe Asphalt COMPANY petitioner. T-
Union Development and Construction Carrsr- 20
AL petition frr q wit a es--i--a-F o. III. T.--f
States Cir-Iit CGIrr . AIT.als for -le Fifth r.--
cult submitted by 1Ir- +. D. BrlsE-Isra and 1I-
Joseph IT. Can f0r tie Is-irip-sr- and Mr. Wirar
Grant and Mr. Harry II. Han for rIe rCsur-de-'--
No. 49, Pitt-rurE Manufacturing C-mror- rgr--
'naer. vs. The ludlow Valve Manufacturing C.1-
Tolv- petition '0T wit ~ cCrrr-ari tu rl- United
states Circuit Court II Appeals f1y The Tair5 circuit
submitted Dr. 1l-- Jamrs 7 Hay f-r tLe rcti...r.-
rH FEHHH.HH AZ
shall for rle r9-vrui,ut
No. s9. The Illinois Central Railroad Cru-,-r.
appellant. s.. Rrtrt ". SLe--rg aLuiri--rrt.-
&c motion % aLraucr under the tEirv-sa~-r- -rr
and 10 dismiss ~ affirm submitted Ir 9I- John g
Miller fer the appellee iu support q tha ----a
and 1- Al-. BlewC-- Lee and lIr Edmund Ta-
tTe t-r -rg appellant U opposition thereto
No 'e'. Eavsra A. sdcid Ct al. plaintiffs t1
,rr1-. rs The People e the State rf Illinois aE
re.-. John J. HeaIv States attoruer. motion 10
dismiss -r affirm submitted tv Mr. JAIME, Hlu.--..
Lewis. for the Lcfeudar- in errr. in support q
the motion. and by Mr. HAIRY -. Ngclr-lcr E.r
tae plaintiffs in error. IN opposition thereto.
No 81 southern Pacific Terminal Company %
al. APPELLANTS. rs. The Interstate Ccmmsr-a CON
mission ard
No 50 r. n. Yrmg. appellant. rs Tie I--
submitted by 1Ir. Maxwell Esa-rs- tor the sqpz!-
lauts
NO. so2. Southern Pacifc Company % al. ap-
pellarts. The Interstate Commerce Commission.
motion % advaucs submitted hy Mr.. Maxwell
E'ars, t.r the appellants.
No. s-s F. Morse Archer. substituted receiver.
&c petitioner. vs. Fidelity Trust and safe DeDos-
Company 90 a.. eXecItlrs &c-. petition for a WIT
q CcrrlCra- % the Tinted states Circuit C-srt g
Appeals for the Third circuit submitted tv lI- J.
Arthur LUhau. Mr.. Reynolds ID. Brown NJ
Malcolm Lloyd. r., and Mr. Charles n Bun FOR
te petitioner. and by Mr. Ira Jewell Williams fr-
The respondent.
No ,9s Tie United States ey r.-. Ami. Kerss
j .Hs
County, H.; petition frr WIT NJ -r--lr-7-t %
che United States Clr-st Court Of Appeals --r -t-
seventh rr-li- submitted 5y 3I-. H. W5rslin
Nhes-'sr. f5y tle petitioner end h~ Mr William
n AcEt0r. for the respondent
No. s5S. The General FITsIr11llg CCupauv. petl-
t1us-. vs l. Nallac. a son. and
No. ss. The Title Guaranty and Surety Company
q scranton. Pa. petitioner vs.. /. Wallace d Son.
states Cire5.. Court g Aureal5 for The Ef-r-r
Cir-l- submitted by M Amos II. Sargent aI-
7. r. Atwood and M Frank H8garuar for -re
petitioners. and by Nr John \. Husles. for the
N T. Original Ez rarts: In IN, matter OF
The Metropolitan Trust Company of the Cl-y q
New Hork, petitioner submitted tr Nr. H--te--
Parsons. IN behalf q NJ. Hear 3. Co--ou and Mr.
Tlurzius N,Ilvaiuc. for the petitioner. and by
Mr. ]. AsTlnvaL Ho5-e for respondent
No. ss. The Southern Pacific Cou-lur rlri-
tirucr VS.. Fis-ru- DE Nal.e blC7srl admi1Isrrafor
&c petition tr- q v1t ~ cCrti1au o. the Tritti
state, Circuit Court q Appeals for the First CIR
Cui- submitted Or Mr. William d. Turner and AR
Moss Williams. for the petitioner.
NJ. Original The state % Oklahoma CON-
ulaiulur vs. The AtchiS7n. Topeka and Santa Fe
Railway Company. motion for leave On file bin 1s
co-il. .aint here submitted by Mr.. Charles West,
FOR tho complainant.
N. Original Tie state of Oklahoma com
7 T-airaut vs. The A;chis1n Topeka and santa F-
Railway Company et al. motion frr leave ro ME
tl- OF complain herein submitted bv Mr. Charlie
"A ln.~ u .g..
No. 732 Thomas Rhodrs plaintiff IN error vs.
Ebert y Manning 20 al.
No. Ii0 Edward T. Rhodus plaintiff tn f-r1-.
vs. Elbert y Manning et al:
No. Al. Birch F. Rhodus plaintiff IN error vs..
E.be-1 y. Manning ct al: and
No. ~ BI-CA +. Bholus Ct al plaintiff r7 a--
TCT. Us E-hSu y. Manning 60 al. motion O. dis
miss OF affirm submitted by Mr Joseph Wez=e--
bach. NJ. Charles r. Holden and Mr. Samuel
Alscauler. for the defendants in er-1- in ,--r---
o. the motion and hy Mrs BENJAMIN c. Barrracl
and Mr. Joseph r. David for The plaintiffs In er7-
IN opposition thereto. motion % grant crsl arm
ment on the above motion submitted by Mr.. Jo~spl
'esscnhach IN behalf Of counsel for the plaintiff ~
error. ard denied.
No. 9Z.. William ". Wilmerton. Detitiorrr. vs..
Frank WImerton et a.; petition for a Hut q
,TuoTau 20 the United States Circuit Court q
Appeals for the Seventh circuit submitted By Mr..
r &. Mason. IN behalf cf Mr. james NJ Spear.
er the petitioner. and By Mr. S. 5. Gregcry. for
he respondents.
No. go RausCme Concrete Machinery Crnrarv.
'CtticCer vs. United Concrete Machinery C0-1r4ry-
-etitm for wit Of ccrtorari 10 the United stats
rcllt Court Cf Appeals for the Second cir-it
submitted by Mr.. +. C. Mason in behalf az N-.
-harles l. Nturtevant for ,the petitioner. and by
ur. stephen J. Cox. for the respondent
Nc So William W BCr-p Limited Y,1s,r,;a
u error. vs William Waterhouse a. al. sxe,-,to-,
&c; motion 20 advance submitted hy Mr. FvsDs
Browne In behalf Cf counsel for the defendants I1
.rU-.
No 90 TIE Lehigh Valley Transrortati,r C--,-
r1y, claimant. &c. petitioner, vs. Thomas N1rt
r. GO al; petition for writ Of ccrtio-ari IN tr.
uted States Circuit Court of AuuaaI- for .I-
second circuit submitted by NJ John Sr7ldir-
lannlTy. In hcLan q Nlr. ArchihaIl O D.