The Fargo forum and daily republican. [volume] (Fargo, N.D.) 1894-1957, 1910-02-01

/ the issues involved
The witness Mary Kingsley merely
testifles that she was at the Hassepa
wedding and overheard defendant ass
plaintiff IL she could not walk honle'
The proof shows that plaintin was at-
| tired in delicate gown and the WaiAs
were muddy and this incident IS reilpe"
on as a circumstance showing extreHe
cruelty on defendants part
The witnesses Irene Clark and HazeA
Hull merely refer to Bruces actions In
1907 in not wanting to leave the Doug-
las home to visit mis- father.
The witness Dickinson-who is an
employe Of the steamship company
| testified by deposition as to the Local
tion of the cabin which defendant en-
| gagged.
The witness Francis sill testified by
deposition that she saw Mrs Rindlauh
CARRYING very heavy bag while they
were going to the train at Naples, and
she saws the doctor was walking be-
side her and did not carry anything
and she further says: HE was pala
and haggard, he was always suriy.
very surIy and very disagreeapie.
80. Do YOU know how far it was she
carried that heavy bag? A. ! shouo
think 1t was the distance OF perhaps
less than two of our blocks. Later
she testified: 60 What did you se@
as to the manner in which ne acteo
i toward her at the various times tnan
you saw him on that trip? A..
should say that he was very dlsaBree-
able, very uncouth, and rather an un-
usual man, especially we were very
much surprised to learn that they We're
bride and groom. had supposed tnaG
they had been married long While
and that he was very mucn broken IN
health and In every possible way ne
was a man that was completely brok-
ell down / should say; he was verT
disagreeable."
The witness Johnson very intt~
mate friend for over forty years OK
PLAINTIFFS father-called at the Rind-
laub home in company with PLAINTIFFS
father four days prior to the COM
mencement of the action and he cor~
roborates plaintiff regarding the in
cident in which, as they were leav1n@
the house, plaintiff said to her father.
give my love to mother" to which
the doctor replied in sneering tone
of voice, your love to mother, eh?'
and he says the doctor was In an
agitated condition at the time.
Edna White testified by deposttiom
to meeting and forming an intimata
acquaintance with plaintiff while In
Alaska in the fall of 1906. She testi-
fles to PLAINTIFFS nervous condition
while there 1t is apparent from the&
testimony that they became chuma
as they were together most of the Tins
and occupied the same stateroom
while going from Marble Creek to
Ketshikan and from the latter places
to Juno.
The witness, Mrs. West testified thaS
in June, 1906, she met the parties az
Detroit, Mimi. and defendant seemed
to be rather cold and Indifferent and
that there was very little conversa%
ton between them. This witness was
patient of defendant and stayed az
defendants home i'm June, 1906, while
receiving treatment from defendant
and among other things, she testifie&
as follows: 20. Did you observe
while there, the treatment OF Mrs.
Rindlaub by her husband? A. Yes
@. State what Ii was; whether Ia
was kind or otherwise? A. II was noa
kind; he seemed to be rather cold and
Indifferent.
@. What did he say or do? A. I
could not say, there was not very much
said. O. Do you mean by that THAI
he seldom talked to his wife? A.
Seldom, while i was there. @. What
is the fact as to whether he talked tn
his wife during meal times? A. Theirs
was very little conversation - @.
What is the fact as to whether dur
ing your stay in his house DR.. Rind~
laub found fault with his wife? A. 4
do not remember hearing him find
fault with his wife except once foE
not sending the horses for me. O.
What did ne say? A. Nothing obs
jectionable. @, But did he scold her
A. 1t was very like scolding. O. When
DR.. Rindlaub talked to his wife what
was his manner as to whether 1t wan
cross or good. natured? A. Cross, <
should have said cold. @. What is
the fact as to whether or not DIR,
Rindlaub frequently talked with his
wife? A. / do not know whether he
talked with his wife or not. O. Did
he talk with her much in your pres-
ence? A. On common place things
On cross examination she testifleds
q. This GOODNESS or unkindness was
in the form of indifference to her? A.
More In manner than speech. O. He
said no unkind words in your pres-
ence? A You would not call them un-
KIND. Q. It was simply the look In
his face that made you think he was
cold and Indifferent? A. Yes. O. You
Continued on Page Nine.