The Washington herald. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1906-1939, 1910-11-02
DISTRICT COURTS.
Court of Anneals.

Present-An
No 40. Billings. &c. vs.. Field. motion Of Mr.
a. s. Wort aington appellant allgEed ten days to
Me reply mief heTein i 50 sdVisef
No. 2l& United States 81 rel. knight VI. Balm
ger ct al; wit Of error 70 supreme Court Of the
United States ordered TO issue o. molten Of Air
William Htz. Of counsel for appellant. and bond
FOR costs fixed AZ $50
No. Zls. District Il Columbia " KRAFT mandsts
orderd to issue forthwith On mouon Of Mr.. T. II.
Th0nas. n counsel for the plaintiff in errE
No 2l9. District Of Columbia " Gregory; same.
No. 28. Graham Bur, motion 20 dismiss
Submitted b. Mr. C. A Barnard. Appearing specially
Tor The spq@llee IN support q TIE motion, and b
Ar. y. 4. Fenning IN opposition thereto,
Original Docket Maghan Vs. Richardson h Bur
gess ct al petition for allowance u special appeal
submitted b. Mr.. J. NJ Chamberlain. Of counsel for
petitioner
No. 93 Psuooast vs. Mcsvecn; dooseted and
dismissed
No. z5a. Wall ". Oyster ct al. argument co7n-
menoed Ly Mr.. John Ridout for appellant continued
By Mr.. Stanton c. Peelie for sppslies. and con
cuded b. Mr. A. A. Birney for appellant.
No 20. Brown Ts. United States. reversed
Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Shepard.
No. 2iS. Frsby rs. United States: reversed
Opinion IS Mr.. Justice Robb
No ZIl7. Hau " Capital Traction Company; 70
verssd Opinion by Mr. Justice Van Orsdel.
No 2IB Mark IS. District Of Columbia; affirmed
OPINION by Mr.. CHIEF Justice Shepard.
No. IL King vs.. Rudolph e al affirmed.
Opiuicl By Mr. Justice Rohb.
No. Zisl. United states ex Tel. Lowe et al vs.
Baiiing5r Affirmed. Opinion By Ar. Justice Van
OrHdel.
No. 4lo Wilson ct al. V. Snow, affirmed. opin-
ion b. Mr.. Chief Justice Shepard.
No zA Capital Traction Company v. Wsthen.
affirmed OI.ui1n b. Mr.. Justice Rabb.
No u3i- DasAields w. Moses Sons; reversed
Opinion 1y M Justice Van Orsdd
No A74. Mitchell Mining Company ~. Emig e.
a. order q ArTl G. 1910 reTeTSed- Opinion b. NJ
Chief Justice Shepard.
No 2L72 H1erner vs. Bell reversed. Opinion By
Mr.. Justice Koth.
No 2G. Arlington Brewing Company IS Wyym
e all Te1erae1. opinion By Mr. Justice Van
Orsdel
No zs. Cunningham e. a.. rs. Taylor e al t;
affirmed. Opinion b. Mr. Chief Justice shepard.
10. Zs2. George A Fuller Company vs. Ne
C1sEey affirmed. Opinion Boz Sir. Justice Robh.
No ZG. United States a rel Early vs.. Richards;
affirmed. Opinion hy NJ Justice Van Ors,lsl
No Za fltcLlgEn vs. District - Columbia
argument commenced By Mr.. Preston 3. Ray for
plaintiff u error continued by ST. F. II. Stephens
Tor defendant in error concluded by Mr. !. r.
Braddock f1E plaintiff in error.
No -. Goldsmith rs. Valentine. argued by
4nca f1r appellee.
No "a Houston q al vs. Houston q a.. sr.
glmeUt commenced by M-. William T. Houston in
pr1pra Tereona, continued by Mr. Clifford Z.
Church In pToFra persona concluded hy Mr.. VIII
lam T. Houston in Ir1pria persona.
Patent appeals No. t-s. Brewer ". Whitney. 10.
f53 Ruling rs. Lowry Ne=. go CT, and 65s Ledod
rs DomI-yer. No. csc. DomUster vs.. Ledoff; con
tiuued.
No. I9 Fletcher vs. Liyscomb. argument e1n-
macsd by Mr. Lawrence Hufty for appellant. con
tiuucd bog Mr.. W r. Reilly for appellee concluded
by Mr.. Edmund Burke for appellant.
No Zzss. Graham Burr. passed and motion 20
dismissed postponed until hearing on merits.
Original docket No. Sos. Lewis. &c. q Persons /.
petition TT slIogauce Il special appeal overruled
Original docks: No 56i Maghzn Ct a. vs.. Rich
aTdsOu x Burgess 20 al. same.
Assignment for November 2;
Regular call.
No. 2l5s. Rawlings vs.. Collins Attorneys Jones
Ridolt
No. 2lJ. nrs,0 IS. Hutchinson Attorneys sh0les
-AIcCanm5u & Hayden
No 2ltl. Iowa Apartment House Company -
Heischel. Attorneys Leighton & McLschleu.
No. -lf- Nirt-l v. Smith Piano Company. At
torneys Budi,,l-Suliiyau
NJ 2iH BirHfeld vs. Fourteenth Street Savings
Bank. ATTORNEYS David & Wolf-Wheatley.
No. 2il4 Washington Terminal Company vs. Dis
trilt q Columbia; aud
No. zl-5 District 4 Columbia vs. Washington
Terminal Company. Attorneys Hamilton Colbert.
Nerbes & Hamil-on-Th0mas.
No. -l-5. Campbell vs.. Northwest Eckington In
pE1gemut Company. Attorneys Rid0ut-Ralstcn
sdiaus * Richardson.
40. 2l7s. Bride vs.. Reeves Attorneys. O'Caua-
gh-u, Bride & richardson Idout & Edwards
d. L!a. Alexander vs.. Alexander. Attgners
Adriaans-TrIitt & Patterson.
Ne. 2lS United STATES rs. Title Guaranty aud
Surety Company. Attorneys, Wilson * Hmd5toI-r
Walker & Cox.