The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1910-10-26

Ihl- straight reply tn Mr. WAIKER's
dire, questions was followed bv Mr..
DlN = nrth her statement at ALBANY on
Monday iu r">pou,'' Ia COLONEL RoosE-
WITS persistent ,haTge. " Albany
NJ DIN rNhpblt'-i the ludicrou- bunder
rha l. b"hIni the President raiter-
dt,i d"iamaiion>
lhrr" hay" been two STANDARD Wall
Paper companies The first. II which
n" knows nothing and with which he
never had ANYTHING Ia do "a owner
or director - that standard company
which entered the trust in ISaS and sub
-rqlIrutlv got INTO the Federal courts
nm connection with the SUIT nf the Con
tln"utal Wall Paper COMPANY. or trust.
against IA" Laws NpIght 4 Sons Com.
panv. II was dissolved and went oI, 81
"Nl~t"u'r IN 1917 This was three nr
four wears before MIR DIX became con
n"ct"d with second Standard Wall
Paper company. organized on AN en-
tlr"ly different basis from the first and
doing business with different capital IN
an entirely different wav. although 1t had
acquired some ~ the property Of IT.
extinct uam,.~ake
Ia III" second ar nun-trI-t standard
Mr. DIN instead vt being the leading
s'"ckh"ld"r and director owns three
quarters nf on" T,.r cent II the capital
stock HIS connectlon with any Stand
ARD company culpablc nr innocent under
m" sherman law. did not beg,n until
fal.,tHt II h.s
Tor which Mr. NALkER mISrepresented
lam - manly responsible II dad not
b"-in uu'rl - YEAR and = half after
M" rendering Of the opinion bv Judge
luETuN WHICH colonel ROOSEVELT has
been shouting from the stump from
iav ', dty. When IN" supreme Court
banded down "a February. 1919, IT, de-
rr-r"n "mbodvlnG parts oi IN. remarks
mad" from the bench several wears
earlier nv Judge LURToN IN the Circuit
tpurt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
III" Standard Wall Paper Company with
which MIR DIN had not hIng whatever To
10 had ALREADY been "ut of existence for
about iiv" wears
~ubInned - the conclusion 81 Mr.
loHN \. DiNS comprehensive and ex-
plIrIt statement
repeat with al No emphasis a. my rom
mani my previous assertion mat am not COZ
ne''cd. directly or Indirectly. with any wall paper
'rrl,' never nWnri directly Indirectly. any Of
'n" stock ~ securities 81 me Continental wall
Paper company. and never owned. directly ~
indirectly any ~ the stocS securities Of The
Standard Wal PAPER com many witch uas De
''nfan' ln the Nrton tried before Judge ivEroN
IN order finally 20 settle al questions ~
'H.s .I7d desire 20 >av once for all thai am IN
u' ,ar connected Ut'h Any company which IT,
directly 0r indirectly part ~ or Interested IN any
tr - or combination.
rh.. SHo'e b..in"s. sroris another sumpls
- the rs,- 0s~- manner n ah.rh no former Prrsl
zen 81 ne ni'"i ~'ste, mi>u.e- he S'~s stand
lLs which be- acquired by ~, election To The PrsN
dcucJ 10 misrrprr.cnt ihoSe no opposs MIN In
any Way ana while 2 an charitable enough TO
ass ~" mar he may hAv, teen led 70 make the~e
rrraI'., ard .ngrouudei charges by faIse reports
MAD" % aim tr hos" .arroundins him. nov ds
rr trI 80 on" American riurrn OF ano'hrr that
o. nae" % me 'or this u'N-pr-sen = ton me
sp0'oss NH'.E ore gentleman owes 20 smother for
p. On InHo Ir'a-, u..rrp'r~er alton
ON NJ" same night ~ Ithaca. with the
fa'l- stated IN m" "tter 81 Mr. DIX ~
Nr NNLKER h"for" hum. the ex-Prs-I.
d"r' 81 IN" nltei States was saving:
ms statement - ur. DIS i compepy
r.s ~aa.ns I'rs- 30 luovs nothing about
Nhp' he romparr ~ Vt,7 ~ Is = director
roe r~"1 J0Ins. Ur boz - - tran, In his ansuer
- 'nE V'l torn 20 9ages - 20 - inrlusivc 81
Vol m" -., - ne rlied S'a'rs Reports you
v.H 0nd n" trsl Is~i,.on ~ The supreme Court
declaring .~gAI the trust - winch NJ DIS
Standard VAN Pap"r Company "a a meub Der
rt, decision -. rendered IN rebruar, 80
r,sr r~s- and = Haf after VI pu srAsd nat
20 rsH become director - one - me coupa,..
IN no ga. .n rr~ tr...'
y 'anauiaIgua ve~teriav. with both
the reply q" WALkFR and the albany
statement befor" hum, the eN-Pr.SldenI
u ~" nit-d states made lest 81 Mr.
DIN suggestion that there was due him
such an apology as one gentleman owes
- another for even involuntary ms
representation. Colonel ROOsEvFiT de-
rIru"i - re- ra,' d, surd he had said
~ representing Mr DIX
T." coarse insults which Mr. RoosF-
VII has flung a distinguished Judges
ur" NOT mor" r"pr"heuS bl" than tins
".b"ri'" attempt bv a wIlfIl p-rNpr-
son ~ IN" facts 10 drag The decisions
= ~" Supr"iU" Court INTO = political
controversy When as' Thursday he
quoted .lIdg" LrET0N A. having de-
,Ii"i that Mr. DIX vas member If
an unlawful combination h" sought 80
~" 'h" impression that ~" ,tuutation
49, that u' an ASSOC at" .lu-tIoe 81 the
supreme ,pirt although he well knew
t' -" '.u,' D." -pok" that IN" dersiun
10 question wa- rendered by Judge
'EIuN when - circuit judg" THIS
I'" I-I"n Na- rendered On January 4.
''IH. a',l r"'"-~arly referred ~ ante
,"d"r' facts When Mr.. DIX answered
Lat b." had no .u'"r"~t whatever either
A. a -i"'khold"r or u director IN IN.
standard Wal Paper Company until
1875 and drL not I-.,nula a director ~
'h"r"Wrdu" uh'iilIIn" 1916. Nr ROOsF-
WIN mot dl-iug"nupu~ly replied that