The Hickman courier. [volume] (Hickman, Ky.) 1859-current, 1910-01-13
CIRCUIT COURT DOCKET
Larger Than Usual Many New Lfgants Divorce Suits Pile
Up, Indicate Marriage a Failure With Many.
Judge Speight, May Preside in Absence of Judge Bugg
Court Convenes Here Monday, 18th

anu MOTIFS Dullt BLACKSMITH shop
on the lot. Robertson sues for dam
ages because he claims his view is
cut off.
Jake Plant vs.. ]. H. Pickett. Suit
on account.
Appearance Ordinary.
| These cases are set for the fourth
day at Hickman and ninth day at Full
| ton.
F. b. Atteberry VS.. M. & o. X. II.
Suit for damages burning barn. Set
tied.
Ellison Bros. VS.. c. l.. Reid. Suit
on account.
! Chas. Beadles VS.. J. B. Dodd. Suit
on account.
| l.. Davis ct al VS.. N. c. G St L.
r. X. Suit for $4,000 damages for
failure to get a shipment of cattle
to market before fall in prices by
which they claim they were damaged.
Mrs. J. N. Hall VS.. Baptist Flag
Publishing Co. Suit on account.
Z. l.. Steger vs.. Mrs. Lillian Hall.
Suit on paper account.
Kentucky Buggy Co. VS.. j. II. Ran
kin, Receiver. Suit on account.
Rufus Soloman vs.. b. +. Chambers.
Suit on account.
Joe w. Bennett VS.. Johnson Mere
Co. Suit on account.
| ]. M. Melton VS.. Mengel Box Co.
Melton claims that his health was
damaged by the improper construc-
ton of a truck he used while an
employ of that company. He sues
for 81 900.
c. M. Brown VS.. G. f. Remley.
Suit on account.
! c. T. Bondurant VS.. F. H. Light
foot. Attachment suit.
M. ID. Hardin VS.. City of Fulton.
Suit for $1,000 damages for cutting
down street in front of his residence.
| Mrs. M. ]. Bolton VS.. A. N. King
ct al. Suit on note.
Joe Ballard VS.. City of Hickman.
Ballard, who was employed as night
policeman was discharged and new
sues for $55 damages, claiming he
was out of work one month by reas-
on of the city failing to fulfill its
contract with him.
City Of Fulton VS.. w. w. Meadows.
This is only another suit as the out
come of the recent street contract
ing muddle.
]. w. Morris Exrs. VS.. B. +. Cham
bers ct al Suit on note.
]. p. Thomas VS.. b. f. Chambers
ct al. Suit on note.
w. II. Badger VS.. Fulton County.
| Badger sues for damages caused by
his horse breaking its leg in a bridge
in the bottom.
Nose Barkett VS.. Williams & Con-
ner. Suit on a 500 account. The
suit was brought in the city court
but defendants filed a counter bill
for $500 and the suit was carried to
the circuit court.
First National Bank of Paducah VS..
Guy Tucker. Suit on note.
Continued Equity.
These cases are set for the third
day in Hickman and the eighth day
in Fulton.
II. c. Amberg VS.. W. G. Perry.
Mrs. Jennie Mcclure VS.. Mrs. Lou
Harper.
j. II. Mcclure VS.. l.. w. Graham.
s. X Davidson VS.. Cumberland TEL
ephone Co.
Tom Ringo VS.. Pap Ferrill
Albert Roper vs.. j. A. Robertson
ct al.
Della Mailing VS.. York Mailing.
Suit for divorce.
Tom Dillon jr., VS.. Bob Chambers
ct al.
| j. +. Dawes VS.. w. r. Roper ct al.
The Farmers Bank of Fulton VS..
The Hand Made Buggy Co.
w. II. Badger VS.. Jim Miles Admr.
Ed c. Paschall VS.. Finley Bynum.
| K. p. Hodges VS.. j. S. Pharris ct
al.
w. II. Porter ct al VS.. w. A. Ad-
! ans ct al.
Mrs. Susie Erwin VS.. Arthur Erwin.
Suit for divorce.
Emma Bats VS.. Isaiah Bats. Suit
| for divorce.
oliver Badger VS.. A. L. Badgers
Administrator.
| David Mann ct al VS.. Mrs.A Il.
Watson.
Geo. l. Boyle ct al VS.. Lewis At
will.
G. T. Meacham VS.. Sis Shelby ad-
ministrator.
Myrtle Milford VS.. Tom. Milford.
Suit for divorce.
ID. b. Wilson vs.. @. T. Bondurant.
Suit for settlemtnt.
Jessie Laid VS.. Albert Ladd. Suit
for divorce.
Ruth Fuller's Admr. VS.. Her Heirs
and Creditors.
Lee McClain. Guardian VS.. Ella
Bergman ct al.
Lee McClain, Guardian, VS.. w. +.
Murrell ct al
Mrs Matte Burton VS.. l.. w. Bur
ton. Suit for divorce.
w. G. Johnson VS.. J. l.. and Lon
Robertson.
w. G. Johnson VS.. J. l.. Robertson.
w X. Hall VS.. j. II. Thompson.
w. A. Dodds VS.. II A. Craddock.
Justin Atteberry VS.. y. Is. Atte-
berry. Suit for settlement.
w. A. Dodds vs.. j. II. Brown. Suit
on account.
ID. w. Mcclure vs. ]. NJ. Atteberry.