The Lake County times. [volume] (Hammond, Ind.) 1906-1933, 1910-02-11


be forecIosed and cut on: that the
piadntin is entitled to a reasonable at
torney's fee for the foreclosure of said
Hen and that q reasonable sum there
fore IL I'VE dollars.
The court further finds that there Is
now due the plaintiff from lot twenty
seven t27) block nfty-four (54), Sec
ond Oak Park addition to To1lestcn, the
sum of one and $500 (S1.s5) dollars;
that the plaintiff 1. entitled to the fore
closure of said lien against said lot and
that the equity of redemption of the
defendants John Macarthur and Agnes
Macarthur. as to said lot be foreclosed
and cut of: that the plaintif is entitled
to a reasonable attorneys fee for the
foreclosure of said lien and that a rea-
sonable sum therefore Is 1ve dollars.
! The court further finds that there is
now due the plaintiff from lot twenty
| eight (zs) block ffty-four (54. Sec
ond Oak Park addition to Tolleston. the
| sum OF one and 65-1o0 ($1.65) dollars;
| that the plaintiff is entitled to the fore
! closure of said lien against said lot
and that the equity of redemption of
| the defendants John Macarthur and Az
mes Macarthur, as to said lot be fore
closed and cut on; that the plaintiff is
entitled to a reasonable attorneys fee
for the foreclosure of said lien and that
/ q reasonable sum therefore is five
| (ss.oo) dollars,
| The court further finds that there Is
now due the plaintiff from lot fifty
| (5o), block fifty-four (54). Second Oak
| Park addition to Tolleston, the sum of
one and e5-1eo (s1.s5) dollars; that the
plaintiff Is entitled to the foreclosure of
said lien against said lot and that the
| equity of redemption of the defendants
Andrew johnson. Esther E. Porter and
| Charles c. Teare, as to said lot be fore
closed and cut on; that the plaintiff is
entitled to a reasonable attorneys fee
for the foreclosure of said lien and that
a reasonable sum therefore Is five dol
| lars.
The court further finds that there IL
| now due the plaintiff from lot twelve
! C1) block thirty-six (36), Second Oak
Park addition to Tolleston, the sum of
one and 65-100 ($1.e5) dollars; that the
plaintiff is entitled to the foreclosure
of said lien against said lot and that
the equity of redemption of the defend
ants Lewis w. Croker and - Crook
err, his wife, whose true christian name
| is unknown, as to said lot be forec1osed
and cut of: that the plaintiff Is entitled
to reasonable attorneys fee for the
| foreclosure of said lien and that a
reasonable sum therefore Is nve dol
| lars.
The court further finds that there IS
now due the plairNin from lot FIVE CD,
block thirty nine (39), Second Oak
| Park addition to TolIeston, the sum of
| one and e5-100 ($1.s5) dollars; that the
plaintiff Is entitled to the foreclosure
| of said lien and that the equity Of re-
demption of the defendants, Effe T.
/ McMahan and - McMahan. her hus-
49, III CD na ma fS
unknown, as to said lot be foreclosed
and cut off; that the plaintiff is entitled
to reasonable attorneys fee for the
foreclosure of said lien and that rea-
sonable sum therefore is five dollars.
The court further finds that there is
now due the plaintiff from lot six 60.
block thirty-nine (3s). Second Oak
Park addition to Tolleston. the sum Of
one and $500 1S1.s55 dollars; that the
i plaintiff is entitled to the foreclosure
/ OF said Hen against said lot and that
/ the equity of redemption OF the de-
PENDANTS, Efie T. McMahan and -
McMahan, her husband, whose true
| christian name Is unknown, as 20 said
lot be foreclosed and cut on; that the
plaintiff is entitled to a reasonable at
! torney's fee for the foreclosure of said
lien and that reasonable sum there
fore is 1ve dollars.
The court further finds that there Is
now due the plaintiff from lot twelve
(2J, block thirty mine (ss). Second
Oak Park addition to Tolleston. the
sum Of one and 65-10o ($1.65) dollars;
that the plaintiff is entitled to the
foreclosure of said lien against said
lot and that the equity of redemption
of the defendants, Henrietta Gillespie
; and Gillespie, her husband. whose
true christian name Is unknown. as to
, said lot be foreclosed and cut off; that
the plaintiff is entitled to reasonable
3 attorneys fee for the foreclosure OF
said lien and that reasonable sun
therefore Is five dollars.
The court further finds that there Is
+; now due the plaintiff from lot thirteen
I (1s), block thirty-nine $3.50, Second Oal
Park addition to Tolleston. the sum OF
: one and 65-10o ($1.65) dollars;stha the
( pIaintinf is entitled to the foreclosure
e Of said lien against said lot and tina
. the equity of redemption of the de
1 PENDANTS, Henrietta Gillespie and ---
Gillespie, her husband, whose true
q christian name is unknown, as to saat
q lot be foreclosed and cut of; that thu
e plafntiY il entitled to a reasonable at
0 torney's fee for the foreclosure of sait
t lien and that reasonable sum there
a fore Is Ave dollars.
: The court further finds that there i
: now due the plaintiff from lot eighteen
1s). block fortyfour (44), Second Gal
e Park addition to Tolieston, the sum o
: one and $500 (s1.65) dollars: that tn
d plaintiff is entitled to the Foreclosure
e OF said lien against said lot and tina
$ the equity Of redemption of the defend
e ants william Mcclure. Esther e. Por
t ter and Charles c. Teare as to said 10
4 be forec1osed and cut Off; that tn
= plaintiff Is entitled to a reasonable at
e torney's fee for the foreclosure of sal
: lien and that a reasonable sum there
: fore is I'VE dollars.
The court further hnds that there |
now due the plaintiff from lot twent
(zo). block fortyfour CAD, Second Gal