Eagle River review. [volume] (Eagle River, Wis.) 1890-1927, 1910-09-09

leases except with the consent of the
government, thus preventing their acqui-
sition by a combination or monopoly and
upon limitations as to the area to be in
cIuded in any one lease to one individual,
and at certain moderate rental, with
royalties upon the coal mined proper
toned to the market value OF the coal
either at Seattle at San Francisco. OF
course such leases should contain condi-
tons requiring the erection of proper
plants, the proper development by mod
ern mining methods of the properties
leased, and the use of every known and
practical means and device for saving the
life of the miners.
Oil and Gas Lands.
In the last administration there were
withdrawn from agricultural entry $780,
600 acres of supposed Oil land in Califor-
mia; about a million and half acres in
Louisiana, of which only 6,500 acres
were known to be vacant unappropria-
ted land: 5000 acres in Oregon and 174-
600 acres in Wyoming, making total of
nearly 100000 acres. In September, 1909,
I directed that all public oil lands,
whether then withdrawn or not, should
be withheld from disposition pending con-
gressional action. for the reason that the
existing placer mining law, although
made applicable to deposits of this char
acter, is not suitable to such lands, and
for the further reason that it seemed de-
sirable to reserve certain fuel-oil deposits
for the use of the American navy. Ac-
cordngly the form of all existing with
drawals was changed, and new with
drawals aggregating 275o,ooo acres were
made in Arizona, California, Colorado,
New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming. Field
examination during the year showed
that of the original Withdrawals, 2,170,-
600 acres were not valuable for oil, and
they were restored for agricultural entry.
Il i L. 90 - IL
oil lands in these states were made, so
that July /, 1870 the outstanding with
drawals then amounted to 4,55O,000 acres.
The needed oil and gas law is essential
ly a leasing law. In their natural occur
renee, oil and gas cannot be measured in
terms of acres, like coal, and 1t follows
that exclusive title to these products can
normally be secured only after they reach
the surface. Oil should be disposed Of as
a commodity in terms of barrels OF
transportable product rather than in
acres of real estate. This is, of course,
the reason for the practically universal
adoption of the leasing system wherever
oil land is in private ownership. The
government thus would not be entering
on an experiment, but simply putting
into effect a plan successfully operated in
private contracts. Why should not the
government as a. landowner deal directly
with the oil producer rather than through
the Intervention Of middleman to whom
the government gives title to the land?
The principal underlying feature Of
such legislation should be the exercise of
beneficial control rather than the collec-
ton of revenue AS not only the largest
owner of oil lands, but as a prospective
large consumer of oil by reason of the
increa sing use Of fuel oil by the navy,
the federal government is directly con-
cerned both in encouraging rational de-
velopment and at the same time lnsuring
the longest possible life to the Oil sup
ply.
One Of the difficulties presented, espe-
cially in the California fields, is that the
Southern Pacific railroad owns every
other section of land in the oil field,
and in those fields the oil seems to be in
common reservoir, or series of reser-
voirs, communicating through the oil
sands so that the excessive draining Of
oil at one we'll, or on the railroad terri
tory generally, would exhaust the oil in
the government land. Hence it is i'm
portant that if the government is to have
it's share of the oil 1t should begin the
opening of wells its own property.
It has been suggested, and believe the
suggestion to be sound one, that per-
mits be issued to a prospector for oil
giving him the right to prospect for two
years over a certain tract of government
land for the discovery of Oil, the right to
be evidenced by license for which he
paws a small sum. When the oil is dis
covered then he acquires title to a GER
tain tract, much in the same way as he
would acquire title under mining law.
OF course if the system of leasing is
adopted, then he would be given the
benefit of lease upon terms like that
above suggested. What has been said in
respect to oil applies also to government
gas lands.
Phosphate Lands.
Phosphorus is one of the three essen
tails to plant growth, the other elements
being nitrogen and potash. OF these
three, phosphorus is by all odds the
scarcest element in nature. 1t Is easily
extracted in useful form from the phos-
phate rock and the United States con-
tains the greatest known deposits of this
rock in the world They are found in
Wyoming, Utah and Florida, as we'll as
in South Carolina, Georgia and Tonnes
see. The government phosphate lands are
confined to Wyoming, Utah and Florida.
Prior to March 4, 1909, there were 100000
acres withdrawn from agricultural entry
in the ground that the land covered phos-
phate rock. Since that time, 1922 coo acres
of the land thus withdrawn was found
not to contain phosphate in profitable
quantities. while ,67S, 900 acres was CLASH
fed properly as phosphate lands. During
this administration there has been with
drawn and classified 437, 900 acres, so that
today there is classified as phosphate rock
land 2115,000 acres This rock is most
important in the composition of fertilizers
to improve the soil, and as the future is
certain to create an enormous demand
throughout this country for fertilization,
the value to the public of such deposits
as these can hardly be exaggerated Ger
tafnly with respect to these deposits
careful policy of conservation should be
followed A law that would provide
leasing system for the phosphate depos-
its, together with provision for the sep
aration of the surface and mineral rights
as is already provided for in the case Of
coal would. seem to meet the need Of
promoting the development of these de-
posits and their utilization in the agri-
cultural lands of the west. If it IS
thought desirable to discourage the expor-
tation Of phosphate rock and the saving
of it for our own lands, this purpose
could be accomplished by conditions in
the lease granted by the government to
its lessees OF course, under the consti-
tuition the government could not tax
and could not prohibit the expectation of
phosphate, but proprietor and owner
of the lands in which the phosphate is
deposited it could impose conditions upon
the kind of sales, whether foreign do
nestis which the lessees might make of
the phosphate mined.