Arizona republican., 1910-01-30
KENNEDY WILL MAKE
 FIGHT AGAINST ODDS
ARRAIGNMENT NEXT SATURDAY
 FOR ATTEMPT TO MURDER.
An Action in Which Woman's Con
 tract Figures.

James Canady was before the court yesterday morning. more than two years after two indictments had been returned against him for the attempt ed murder of Pete Cannon and John
 Ryan. near Gila Bend. on Thanksgiv 1 ing night, 1907. It was thought, from his own admissions concerning the af | fair that Canady would plead guilty
 but he had no such purpose in mind
 He had been indicted as James Ken
 nedy, which he said was his right name. When he intimated that the
 territory would have to prove his guilt
 Judge Kent asked him if he had re- | tained an attorney. He replied rather | impudently that he would have q law
 yer when the time came. The court
 remarked that the time seemed to be
 at hand The arraignment was con- | tinued until next Saturday
 The case of Esther M Ford and
 others against Josephine Barnes and | others came mp on motion to strike. l This is an action in which Mrs. Ford 1 seeks to recover $500 which she had deposited IS payment on the New Dennis lodging house. She said that she had entered into the transaction | on certain representations which had
 been made to her by Mrs. Barnes and
 had put up the money with Mir. Erd- | mans. wl;o was made a rar'y to the suit She atterwsrd ioarTcd, she said, that Mrs. .arnes was nos observing her part of the contract hence she wanted her money back. Mir Erlmans could not return it without the con sent of Mrs. Barnes and he vas made a party to the suit Accordingly he
 was released by an order of Ihe court to deposit the money with the clerk.
 Mir Wilkinson. representing the de- fendant. moved to strike and argued that the complaint was so indefinite that he did not know what he had to defend. MT. Hayes for the plain tiff said that the complaint had been drawn on statement of facts made tp him by his client
 Then he did a brave thing in behalf of his client. which will make him the target of all the suffragists and suffragettes of two continents: he furthermore imperiled his standing with women generally.
 Your honor" said he this is an agreement between two women and some allowance should be made for it. The court replied that he could not gather from the papers before him what the parties of the first and sec ond parts had proposed to do to each other and he was quite sure that jury would he at sea if the matter were submitted to it. He therefore directed that the complaint be amend ed and made more definite and cer- tain
 In the case of W. w. Dobson against James Johnson. the plaintiffs motion for new trial was continued for week \ motion for temporary ali mony was continued until next Sat urday.
 In the matter of the Arizona Ranch ] company against $. J. Tribolet mo- tion to make the complaint more spe- cific was granted after a demurrer l had been overruled. .s
 A demurrer was withdrawn in the l William Crismon.
 A demurrer was continued for a week in the case of the Arizona Land | against W-ilfred Johnson.
 A petition of the First M F. church . for permission to mortgage it's prop erty was granted.
 In the case of Urban Walter against i the Southwestern Underwriters com pany for commission on q stock deal an order to dismiss was granted on II the plaintiffs failure to furnish se- curity for costs. II
 In the case Of the Standard Devel- II opment and Investment company |, against the Bishop Creek Gold com pany, the plaintiff was given judg- ment for q little more than $G9.060 on nine notes. IA