The Richmond Virginian. (Richmond, Va.) 1910-1920, 1910-05-07
[Vy IS asked
m llNaT|Oh
1 B -.------ss
lsayor Warts to Know if Or
1 dinance Was Suspended
Without Authority
\ DIN. AGE SUIT MAY NOW
RESULT FROM CHARGE
l Councilmen Pollock and Wise
Specifically Accused Of Having
Used Improper Influence
With Health Officers.

6uft for criminal libel may be I'm
+ skttufed against the aecusers Of coun-
E1lnen Gilbert Pollock and George
Wise ~ result or the charges OF
sottacial rntsconauct maze against them
and publiAhed exclusively In The Viz
Ngini&n Friday afternoon.
councilman Wise Indignantly de-
dared Saturday, evening that nc woaia
prove the accusations utterly false ana
without foundation at the special
Council meeting Monday night. and
that this being DONE hhe would At
the proper time consider the bring
tng of proceedings against his aecus-
1Fo.
i3sses raarges asat4st The two soun~
4tinsen have resolved themselves into
IN specific accusation that they &C.
0apted $500 from certain dairymen,
sn<st Tor services rendered In the Hust-
4nyn Court, but Tor inducing DIR. q. C.
Levy, for the City Health Depart
M&nk TO have the Board of Health ASK
xh3 Councii to amend the ordinance
px0hibtting dairyrnen from feeding
Ec~xsAan distklisry bi-products to their
Dr. T,csy Bruuxhf In.
u IN. Levy, chief health officer OF the
nifty hA1 also boen drawn in under
&14 general charges, he being accused
nj hayinx auspe,,ded the Ordinance IA
si16tion without authority or even
h 17~s,ssr fstsh. ras.,n ubo a datarr1ined
- k,ss...- $3.50 !. F..,s tss,.-.s-. 49,. !
49, 1890. 1a..s. s.t..s -.
~ explanation.
"a m Levy has replied that he did no,
pepd the ordinance. Against this Il
S%x3ko statement uf MaaSrs Pollock and
- Inai tney wore assured by tins
- ~ neAitn oHacer that tneir cnenti
q 0hsl ~ ~ 1aiioWeu to Ieen tne pronipit-
60 o!suiiery m&sn until tne board q
n HAAlth could decide definitely what 4
wOnld Recommend to the Council. and
i thai their clients were allowed to dc
: this without molentation.
{ axzSniffed that the 1900 received IL
Them was for services rendered before
\ the Board Of Health, or rathfar before
I nr Levy. They insist, however. that
they had 4 perfect riuht,to rarrasa ~
& shcir clients ia such q rsnnar e sna
fhnf tfe fact that INV $50 ss.,,,.1s,
I men ana conseoukr,,y ,nssssssa =,
& certain pawer Il. r,.s 49, !. !.
i owed hfs nostttrn = - fss...n ny .o
n sss,t once entnx ~. - aas , Luusi. aaa
I. nc rnatten ..' ...o .ne us aASioal, ~
-. 20 Nolas.ustou purely
Hs.oMn merits
II. -. Levy 1a1ks.
ss -. - . 1aturaAy kass aetaiien
s.1s 80 i. 49,. rno sonsIoseray as y AZ
\ aak<s' y I'M uesiaI,hk tnat ne with
I l IS 80. 1919 .aps oIuon, Ut ETans
s .u . No1,snalaah sacuo pnaaut
4 sss1 s.ss1as nioMA tne situatIoh 20 the
! - -. .N ~ 10y ai'er the most serious
Il Il 49, $500 Nunefous Fumors
xss~ s.s...ss naa .oMe 70
1870 $3.50 " ~ $50; ana ne TEX that thc
{ s1oa y sne si.s uepenaeu upon . re-
sn. - nv snas W - mic y sne Iunors
49, . NY ~, ~ miaheu the accused
y E q ~ 70 thoEouxhiy sinolcat-
Y IA
j ....s, 80 = taa lhAH Was about tne
81 lIsiss Ni-pruuuet. nhoWn az gram
n 1.ls ns halu. nus proouct a.
NEST excellent mdik producers When
Il M5l0weu to become stale Ii IN very