El Paso herald. (El Paso, Tex.) 1901-1931, 1910-10-04
FOUR JURORS ARE
SECURED IN THE
LEECH TRIAL
Continued from Page one.)

influence upon him in trying the case
/, The challenge was overruled and eX-
cepted to by the defence. The defence
renewed its challenge for cause on the
same ground of a fixed opinion and
also because he is related to district
attorney Howe and attorney w. II
Burgess, being their fatherinlaw. The
challenge was again overruled. The
state accepted the juror and the de-
fence excused him peremptorily.
Charles j. Anstrand, employed at the
Hixson jewelry store, was challenged
for cause by the defence because he
was prejudiced against the crime and
the defendant. The challenge was sus-
tanned and the juror excused.
Civil Engineer Walker Taken.
J. z. Walker, a civil engineer, con-
nected with the Southwestern railroad,
was passed by the state and defence.
fence took him.
r. S. p. Cass, clerk, was passed.
by the state and defence. The state
and defence then took the juror.
The Special Venire.
The remainder of the special yenire
for the Leech trial follows: Fred Lem
ley, A Golding, w. E. O'Brien, George
V. Calvert, H. NJ. Maple, W. Rosing.
W. c. Taylor, H. Andreas, Sam MILF
D.
Held, A Camoze, Dick Newton, David
Block, D. H. Heineman, A II. Snyder
J. 1. Broyles, G. A. frost, August An
dreas, jr., r. P. Talpis, H. s. Potter, w.
Pettus, R. c. Bailey, Clyde Holmes, NJ
G. Buchoz, Richard AinSa, c. Farmer
T. Nj. Wingo, T. a. Thurston, F. Il. Pit
man, J. X. Zimmerman, Jim Paul, W.
D. Mayfield, Fred Wright, ]. r. Strlck-
land, Larry Ford, C. E. Graham, L. s.
D0E II
J. Watts, Chas H Stetter, ]. Davis
Mayfield, J. F. Kilburn, T. E. Thorn
ton, n Solomon, c. H Webster, F.. ]:
Williams, R. NJ. Harvey. Jack Craw-
ford. A W. Reeves, c. A. Donel, G
G. Reum Max Posener, G. B. Ardoln,
NJ. Coblentz, w. L. Pringle, C. E. Her
bert, w z. Race, J. w. Wilkey, j. H.
Wolf, D. P. Caspary, f. w. Freeman
c. L. Wolfe, J. G. Waller, a. F. Reese
Juan Sein, N. Opitz, ]. c. Roman, W. L.
Wilson.
Six More Excused.
Axel Swanson, a tailor; Fred Lemley.
a liquor dealer, and A. Golding, JAM
tor, were, excused because they had
scrup1es against inflicting the death
penalty.
w. E. O'Brien, teller at the Rio
Grande Valley bank, had formed a
fixed opinion and was excused by the
court.
George V Calvert, employed at the
Hoyt Furniture company, was excused
because of fixed opinions regarding the
case.
H NJ Maple, a real estate dealer,
was passed by the state. He was
challenged by the defence because he
stated that he had formed a fixed
opinion. He was excused by the court.
Both Sides Challenge.
W. Rosing, a clothing dealer, stated
that he had an Interchangeable fixed
opinion and was challenged by the de-
fence for cause, the state joining in
the challenge, and he was excused.
W. c. Taylor, a contractor, was ex-
cused by the state, because he stated
that he had such an opinion that ii
would influence him in the case if i
chosen He was excused by the court,
after the defence was refused an OPP
oortunity 10 question the venireman.
Judge Wharton excepted to this in the
record.
Herman Andreas of the City National |
bank was passed by the state and de- |
fence, the state took the juror and |
he defence excused him on peremp- |
.ory challenge.