The Washington herald., 1910-06-01

York for further proceedings in conformity with the
opinion Of this court. Opinion by Mr.. Justice
Holmes.
Nc s63 The Interstate Commerce Commission,
appellant. The Chicago, Rock Island ard Pacific
Railway Company ct al and
No sT Durham Hanna Munger Dry Goods Com
uany ct al. appellants, vs. The Chicago, Rock
Island and Pacific Railway Company et al; appeals
from the Circuit Court Of tis United States Tor
the Northern district Of Illinois; decree reversed,
with costs. and case remanded with directions 70
dismiss the bill and all proceedings. Opinion bg
Mr.. Justice AcKenna. Dissenting; Mr. Justice
White Alr. Justice Holiness and Mr.. Justice Lsrton
No GIL The Interstate Commerce Commisslon
appellant, vs. The Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Railroad Company: appeal from the Circuit Court
Of the United States for the Northern district Of
Illinois decree reversed. with costs, and cause re
handed with directions TO set aside the INJUNCTION
Kema. Dissenting: Mr.. Justice White, Mr. JUS
tice Holmes, and Mr.. Justice LGrton.
No $50 sheylin-Carpenter Company et al, plain
tifs in error. vs. The State Of Minnesota IN egTor
to the Supreme Court Of the State Of Minnesota;
Judgment affirmed with costs. Opinion b Mr.,
Justice McKenna. AIr Justice Harlan concurs IN
the RESULT
Ne. l5s. J. Alexander Chiles. plaintiff in error
Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company IN error
to the Court Of Appeals Of the State Of KENTUCKY;
udgrnent affirmed with costs. Opinion by Mr.. jus
tice AlcKenna Dissenting: Mr.. Justice Harlan.
No. les Standard OH Company, plaintiff In error,
rs. Abraham Brown: IN error TO the Court Of Ap-
peals Of the District Of Columbia; Judgment af-
hrmed. with costs. Opinion by Mr. Justice Nc
KennS-
No. IA. George c. Rankin. receiver. &c. ct al.
plaintiffs in error rs John Emigh and o. /.
Atkins: in eTur 20 the Supreme Court q The State
Of Wisconsin, Judgment affirmed. with costs. oTin-
ion by Mr.. Justice White,
No. l@ The Louisville and Nashville Railroad
COMPANY plaintiff in error, Spencer Melton; in
error 10 the Court a Appeals q the State 81:
Kentucky Judgment affirmed. with costs. Opinion
By Mr. Justice White
No. Z. Mathilde Won Ellert sistare. plaintiff in
error VS.. Julia L. Sistare. eXecutrix Of Horace
Randall Sistare deceased; in error 10 the supreme
Court Of Errors Of the State Of Connectcut Judg-
ment reversed. with costs. and cause remSnded for
further proceedings not Inconsistent with the Opin-
ion Of this court Opinion by Mr.. Justice White.
No 9 Original. Ex parte: In the matter Of
J. W. Guletter petitioner rule discharged and re
tition for wit of msndamus denied. Opinion by
Air. Chief Justice Fuller
The Chief Justice also announced the following
orders Of the court:
No 49, The United States. plaintiff in error
vs.. Lizzie SeWen and George 3. Wood Sewell; in
error 20 the Circuit Court Of the United States
for the Eastern district Of Kentucky. Per curiam
The Judgment is affirmed on the authority Of United
States vs. Cora Welch ct al, decided Ayul o
1910: bur it is ordered that before the gov
erumeut is required 70 Fay for the land held TO
have been taken plaintiffs below shall furnish sur
No. Original state Of Oklahoma, complainant.
vs. Atchis0n Topeka and Santa Re Railway Com
pany; motion for leave to file bill o. complaint
granted and process ordered returnabe on the first
/ day Of the next term.
| No. 90. Original. State Of Oklahoma. complainant
vs., Atchison. Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Com
pany ct al; motion for leave 20 hle bill Of CON-
| plant granted. and process ordered returnable on
/ the first day Of the next term.
/ M. 4l- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company.
| plaintiff in error, vs.. Riverside Mills motion to
advance granted, and cause assigned 10 be heard on
I the first TUESDAY Of the next term (OCtCbsr ID.
after the cases are-ty assigned fer that day one
half hour being allowed each side for oral argument;
leave granted TO the United States 70 be heard
+. herein as amiCIs OITiae.
No. 5a Alfonso Bailey plaintiff IN error. vs.. The
! State Of Alabama. motion 10 advance granted and
cause assigned 10 be heard the first Tuesday Il
the next term October H. after the cases already
assigned for that day.
No eco William Drsier. plaintiff in error, Us.
7 The United States; and
No 66l. William DTeier appellant. William
Henkel United States marshal, sc; motion to adj
vance granted and cases assigned to be heard as
1 one case on the first Tuesday Of the next term
October IL, -fter the cases already assigned foG
that day
No. 76s Edward A. shedd ct al. plaintiffs in
error. vs.. The People Of the State Of Illinois ez
rel. John J. Healy. States Attorney; IN error "a
the Supreme Court Of the State Of Illinois, judg
ment affirmed with costs
Nc. 7S9 Thomas Rhodus, plaintiff in error vs.
Ebert y. Manning e. ST.;
No. 7io. Edward T. Rhodus. plaintiff in error
vs. Ebert n. Manning Ct al;
/ No. al. Birch F. Rhodos, plaintiff IN error, vs.
Ebert y Manning e. al; and
No. 742 Birch F. Rh0dus ct al. plaintiffs IL
error Ebert y. Manning et al in error 10 th'
Supreme Court Of ;he State Of Illinois; judgments
affirmed with costs.
No. 761. Ong Chang Wing ct al. plaintiffs lr
] h mir Al - eSr
granted. and cause assigned 10 be heard on the frs
Tuesday Of the next term October IL, after ths
cases already assigned for that day.
No. IT. Frank w. Brown. appellant, vs. C. T
Elliott. United States msrsial, &c; Appellant
Brown admitted to bail pending the determination q
bis appeal bis giving bond in the sum OF 500
conditioned according TO law ard approved BY dis
trict circuit Judge Of the United States for th'
Northern district Of California.
No. S3. Alorgans Louisiana & Texas Railroad
and Steamship Company ct al. plaintiff IN error
rs. Gus c. Street. II: IL error to the Court o
Civil Appeals for the Fourth Supreme Judicial dis
triet Of the State Of Texas: Judgment affirmed. Wit
costs.
No. 81. Southern Pacific Terminal Company e
al, appellants Us. The Interstate Commerce Con-
mission ct al. and
No. 81 E. H. Young, appellant. The Inter
state Commerce Commission ct al. motion to ad
vance granted and cause assigned 10 be heard o.
December g. 1910 as one case.
No. Sc. The United States, petitioner, tn,
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company
motion TO advance granted and cause assigned 10 b
heard on December 6. 1910. after the case alreadl
assigned for that day.
No. SO The Illinois Central Railroad Company
appellant vs.. Robert W. Sheegog administrator
&c appeal from the Circuit Court Of the UniteC
States for the Western district Of Kentucky; sd
vanced under the thirty-second rule and judg
ment affirmed. with costs.
No. $50 William W Bierce Limited plaintiff
in error. rs. William Warehouse ct al. executors
SC; motion TO advance granted and Gauss assignee
to be heard December g. 1916 after the cases ALREADY
assigned for that day.
No. sss Hipolite Egg Company. claimant. &c
plaintiff IN error and appellant. vs. The United
States motion to advance granted and as
signed to be heard on January 2 1911.
No. e0e. Southen Pacific company ct al appel
lants vs.. The Interstate Commerce Commission
motion to advance granted and cause assigned Z,
be heard December 6, 1910, after eases already as
signed for that day.
No. s19. The United States Of America. appellant
IS. Lefigh Valley Railroad Company:
10. go The United States Of America. appellant
vs.. Erie Railroad Company;
No. s2I The United States Of America apuaIlsut
rs The Central kailroad Company Of New Jersey
and
No. s1 the United States Of America. appel
LIANT. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company: mo
ton 10 advance grated and cases assigned to b
heard one case on January 2. ISL after the cas-
already assigned for that day.
No. s2 The United States, plaintiff In error, vs.
Press Publishing Company; motion 10 adVanc
granted and cause assigned to be heard Oh the frs
Tuesday Of the next term October ID after tn
cases already assigned for that day. one-haIf hou
being allowed each side for oral argument.
No s52 New York, New Haven and Hartfo,
Railroad Company, plaintiff IN error, vs. Mar
Agnes Walsh, administrator. &c; and
No a. Marv Agnes Walsh. administrator. &c
plaintiff in error, rs. The New York. New Hayel
and Hartford Railroad Company; motion to sdranc
granted and cases assigned to be heard with No 70
on the first Tuesday Of the next term October ii