The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1910-03-19

testimony immediately after he had b~sn
hslped 20 HE chair.
question az Co whether Martin Siidn't
nave three distinct methods in his treat
ment Of SUBJECTS brought the rsolv /;
Pardon me, there 10 not any real CON.
mon sense IN that question"
Mr.. Hatch appealed To the Court 70
request the witness 90 cease such remarks
and Mr. Smith said:
IN sorry " I offended you
You haven't offended me. You've
ohended the dignity OF the Court re-
piled Mr.. Hatch. You have offended
against the ordinary amenities that exist
among gentlemen
Nr. Hatch asked him again n Near
Newport showed that Il had been painted
on After thu at st finished IT,
Ns.s. there's some maddsr in the sky
that looks Is II the picture had been
r,.touched
insisi on a categorical answer
That's a categorical answer. said the
witness
I'm take care os that said Justice
Pagr.
i, was painted by one artist and ~
touched by s1other Originally 1t Was
Then two men have painted On that
ptCt'u~s- said Justice Page.
Nat an tho n,ctur~ or the canvas
y. Would YOU ell me q genuine Innsss.
one THAT had been reto'l~hed by another
artist. \. I would sell u a. a genuine.
original Inness retoCCh~d BY some one elss.
y. What j. ri"-t In Afternoon IN Med
field. lTne-s or the other man. 4 They're
about evenly divided. The lower part has
hern repainted. think It was done about
fif'.en yesrs ago.
y. You will have 20 put the period bark
further than sixteen years because lnness
died IN iSYt \ Then l. must have been
about iSS0. IN the last ten wears Tom Clarke
got everythirg he plintsd.
y. l. that picture crss ksd' 4 I didn't
look for th.r. and I'm Voinr 10 eliminate
cracks from my testimony. Your au~~tion-
are VsrS subtle. bu' thew wont do
went burden my mind with cracks ~
GO through Thorn " YOU wait the to.
Pleas. don't volunteer anything.
said Justice Page
A. 10th" drawing OF the mill IN the
odd Mil Mr.. Hatch tried 20 find out
u the witness didn Z think il Vas not IN
Martins style.
Mr. smith declared that IL WAS exc
ciIts-d we'll enough and looked like Martin.
Its a mill. that's all he said Martin.
never was = draughtsInsn. Its what
he lntend.d It to be
Edward Gay. the first witness. said he
thought h. Gould tel a genuine Homer
Martin " hen he saw IT,
He accepted both Near NeWport-
and Odd Nlill- a. genuine when he Jaw
them IN Clausen's gallery. and didn't
think Near Newport had been freshly
painted.
Emery " Hamilton said he had been
a friend of Martins and was With him
on = trip tn France IN lsse. ~ that time
they went to the neighborhood Of st
ClosId. where the Odd Mill purporta TO
b.. and Martin .ks'ched a mill there
which res~n'bl.-. the ono in the picture
Martin sad he Was golnZ Ia paint u bat
the witness didn't -ee him do It,
James Is Townsend. an art critic and
Publisher. who Was th. last witness. said
h" Naz convinced that the disputed pic
tiir.'S we're all genuine. He admitted On
crosse animation that he syInpathized
With tlBusen bess,i~" he thought the
attacks 80 him Nsr" hItisT and admitted
that h" told otto kRrch. the former
Z lau-eu employees. who gave important
testimony On Thursday. that " woaild h.
Inwise for hun TO fue,sdle with the cam
he dsnl"t that he told karch he might
be indicted for conspiracy