The Washington herald. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1906-1939, 1910-04-01
Circuit Court No. 1.
JUSTICE WRIGHT.

dNO4lLL hAl1hA-
No. 5le5i. Thompson rs woodward End No
5l6sS Thompson Same: verdict Tor defendant.
Attorneys. MILAN smith-Ralston. siddons
Richardson.
verdict for plaintiff for SIS without costs fAttoT-
neys. E. Hiu. F.-R. R. Perry Son and G. T.
Dunlop.
Court adjourned out Of respect to the memory Of
the late Associate Justice Brewer, Of the Supreme
Court Of the United States
Assignment for April l-1iOtOns:
No. L Ashford vs.. Evening Star Company. At
torneys. Davis. Janiss & slatsF-Perry & Son
No. 2. Mooney IS. same Attorneys, same.
No. g. Webster IS Same. Attorneys. same.
No. 4 Benson vs.. Brown Attorneys. Hayden -
Giss
No 5 Reinburg Is Keller. Attorneys. Downing
& BeTTy-DaTr. Peyssr & Taylor.
No. 6. Wheeler ys. Foer e al Attorneys, To
briner-DarT. PeyseF d TAYLOR and strasbgFger
No. 7. Waters IS. Bartlett. Attorneys. Maekall-
Maddox & Gstley.
No. s. United States * rel. MoehneTal vs.. Com
miSsioners Of the District q Columbia, Attorneys
Mcneil & McNeill-Stephenz
No. g Reliance Loan and Trust Company rs
Herald. Attorneys. Gies-Berry Minor.
No. 10 Lockmiller vs., Brink Attornsys Giles
Cary & Donaldson.
No. Il. American Home Life Insurance Company
ys. YodeT. Attorneys, Davs-Hufty.
No y Smith vs.. Protestant Episcopal Cathedral
Foundation Attorneys, MILAN s smith-Perry &
Son aad Taylor
No. IL Applestein IS. Independent Steamboat
and Barge Company Attorneys, Topper & Gusack
Cuttings & ChsmbeTln-SsWmyer Colbert
No. a. Wynkoop IS Shoemaker. Attorney
Beach-Lsmbert Yeatman.
Circuit Court No. 2.
CHIEF JUSTICE CLABAUGH
No. 4s245. Frey vs.. Capital Traction Company
verdict fer defendant Attorneys. c. F. Carusi and
H f. Giassle-R r. Perry & Son and G. T.
Dunlop
No. 5l2ss Miller vs. Arms ct al; verdict fos
plaintiff against defendants Pickf0Td & Ross for
500 without costs. Attorneys r. White-J. ],
Darlington. Bates Warren, Brandenburg & Bran
On motion Of M R. Ross Perry. the court
sdjourns out of respect 70 the memory Of the late
Associate Justice Brewer. 4 the Supreme Court Of
the United States
Assignment for to-day-Nfotions:
No. / Sfershemer Us. Naltby. Attorneys Hoover
& Shields-Hallarn Hallam.
No. . United States to use Keppler vs. Lown.
Attorneys, Douglas Baker-Naddox s Galley and
Ridout.
No 3 Elder vs.. Tufts. Attorneys. Wheauey-
KegWin & Coldren.
No. = United States ez rel. Duncan Tcwnsite
Company vs. Ballinger. Attorneys. Happier &
Merilat-Lawlef. Clements Wright.
No. 5. Poston vs. Washington, Alexandria and
Mount Vernon Railway Company. Attorneys, Carter
& Brooke-Nscksn & Barbour.
No. Stewart rs. Roche ct al Attorneys,
Rhodes-Hariow
No. :. Saunders vs.. Stsgsn- Attorneys, NeWmyeE
& Tobriner-Birney & Woodland.
No. s. DoWney vs. Washington, Alexandria and
Mount Vernon Railway Cor pany. Attorneys. Burke
& Harow-Maeksn & Barbour
No. 8. Vispi vs.. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad
Company. Attorneys. Downing BeTy-Hamilton,
Colbert. Yerkes 6 hamilton.
No. 10. Hutchinson rs Capital Traction Gem
pany. Attorneys, MathT-PeITy & Son and Dunlop.
No. II. James vs. G. A. Fuller Company. Attor-
neys. Bailey, Tucker, Kenyon & Madarland-
DuFili. il.
No. T. Durland vs.. Washington Post Company.
Attorneys. Tucker, Kenyon 6 Macfsrland-Lam-
bert
No. B. Wilson vs. GerStenberg ct al. Attorneys.
Tucker, Kenyon & Afacarland-BerTy Minor.