The Washington herald. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1906-1939, 1910-02-22
Supreme Court of the United states.

Supreme Court of the United states
Present: Tie Chief Justice. Mr. Justice Harlan.
Mr.. Justice Brewer Mr., Justice White Mr. Justice
McKenna MIR. Justice Holmes Mr.. Justice Day.
and Mr. Justice LuTt0u.
Man D. Josepbson. Of New York City. y. Y.
Ernest Knaebel q Denver Colo; Thomas F.
sheridan q Chicago Ill: Charles l. Atteroury.
Of New York City, y. y; George Coihng warner
OF New York CITY \. Y; Merritt Cramer Mechen,
of Sorocco y Mex: William 6. gavett, q Mem
phis. Tenn: Charles A. McCoy. Of Lake Charles,
la; George w. Winstead. Of St Louis, No; Al
bert H Graves. Of Chicago, IL: George 5. Siizer.
q New Brunswick. \. J.. william r Purcell Of
Wshpeton y. OAK: Leroy h. c. DELANEY. Of
Oklahoma CITY Okla; Rice MaXey. n sherman.
Tex: Mark McNahon. Of Banham, Tex, Prank
F. Klenfeld Of Saginaw. Mich; William ;. Hen
dry q Perm Fla. Frank ". Gnnnell, q Bos-
ton. Mass James e Gentry, q Meeker. Colo ;
Abram Bon. Il Boston. Mas; Fred 5 Caldwell
q Guthrie Okla and Harry T. Andrews, Of New
York City were admitted 70 practice.
No 70 William A. Wright comptroller general
Of the State q Georgia 81 a., appellant. vs.
Georgia Railroad snd Banking COMPANY appeal
from the Circuit Court Of the United states inr
the Northern District Of Georgia: decree modified
and affirmed: special order as 70 costs. Opinion oy
Mr.. Justice LuTton.
No S. The Toxavay Hotel Company vs.. J. L
Smsthers & Company q al. on a ceTuncaie ron
the United States Circuit Court 81 Appeals from the
Fourth circuit; question certified answered IN the
negative. Afuioulu % MI atLcl-E1 A4stAAA-
No e. J. H. Friday et al, petitioners. vs Han
& Kaul Company: on writ Of certiorari 10 the
United States Great Court q Appeals ior the
Third circuit; judgment q the Emitted states Or
cut Court a Appeals reversed, with oosts and
iudgnent q the District Court q the United States
Tor tie Western district Of Pennsylvania affirmed.
with costs. and cause remanded 70 SAID District
Court Opinion by Mr.. Justice Lurt0n-
No. 90. Snas Pickett. plaintiff in error. IS The
United States; in error 70 the Circuit CouIt OF the
United States for the Western district Of Okla
bona: Judgment affirmed. Opinion By Mr.. Justice
Lurton.
No. 81. Moses Haas. appellant vs. William
Henkel United states marshal, &c. appeal from
the Circuit Of the United States for the southern
district Of New York: final orier affirmed. with
costs. Opinion by Mr. Justice Lurton. Mr.. Justice
Brewer and Mr.. Justice Nekenua concur IN the
Judgment.
No. SO Frederick A. Peckham appellant vs..
William Hsnkel United States marshal. &c. aT-
peal from the Circuit Court Of the United states
fo- the Southern district Of New York; final order
se7rmed Win costs. Opinion BY Mr. Justice Lur-
ton. Mr. Justice Brewer and Mr.. Justice Mchenna
concur in the Judgment
No. SIS. Theodore H. Price. appellant. " vii
liam Henkel. United States marshal. Sc ct al
appeai from the Circuit Court Of the United States
for the Southern district a New York final
order affirmed. With costs Opinion by Mr.. Justice
L,irton Mr.. Justice Brewer and Mr.. Justice No
Kenna concur IN the Judgment.
No. l Original The state Of Maryland complain
ant. vs. The Stats Of West Virginia; order for the
appointment Of commissioners 70 TX the boundary
line Sc entered Opinion by Mr.. Justice Day.
No s The Western Union Telegraph Company
appellant vs.. P. r. Andrews ct al appeal from
the Circuit Court Of the United States for the
Eastern district Of Arkansas decree reversed win
costs and cause remanded for further proceedings
Opinion by Mr.. Justice Day.
No. 80 Southern Railway Company plalnhH IN
errnr = Samuel 4. Greene;
No AL Louisville and Nashville Railroad CON
pany, plaintiff IN error. rs. John T. Saston' and
No. as Central Of Georgia Railway Company
plaintif in error. IS. John b. Castor; IN error tn
the supreme Court Of the State Of Alabama tudg
ments reversed with costs and cause renanded
for further proceedings not inconsistent with the
opinion OF this court Opinion By Mr. Justice Day
Dissenting Mr. Chief Justice Fuller Mr. Justice
McKenna, ard Mr.. Justice Holmes,
No. To- John II. Olmsted et a., plaintiffs IN q
ror vs. Daniel H. Oimsted et al; IN error TO ne
supreme Court e the State 81 New York; judg
ment affirmed. with costs Opinion By Mr. justice
Day
No. lO4. J. W Forbes ct al. plaintiffs in error
vs. The State Council Of Virginia, Junior Order
United Amerieal Mechanics Of the State Of Ntr
GINA: in error 20 the Supreme Court Of Appeals q
the State Of Virginia; dismissed for the want o.
jurisdiction. Opinion By Mr.. Justice Day.
No. s. ". p Harris. trustee. plaintiff IN error
vs. The First National Bank OF M0uut Pleasant
=
States for the Eastern district Of Texas; judgment
affirmed. with costs Opinion by Mr.. Justics Day.
No 81 Emile SaxlehneT. petitioner. vs. Edward
Wagner ct al en- a writ Of ceTtiorar 20 the United
states Circuit Court Of Appeals for the Sixth
circuit decree affirmed, with costs. and cause re
manded to the Circuit Court II the United States
for the Southern District Of Ohio. Opinion by Mr.
Justice Holmes.
No g. The United States. plaintiff in error, IS
X T. Plowman; in error 70 the United States Cir
cult Court II Appeals for the Ninth circuit ildg
ment reversed and cause remanded to the Circuit
Colrt Of the United States for the District Of
Idaho for further proceedings in conformity with
the opinion q this court, Opinion by Mr. Justice
Holmes Dissenting: Mr. Justice Nckenna.
No. 100. Laurel Hill Cemetery. plaintiff in error
vs. The City and County Of San Francisco ct al.
In error to the Supreme Court Of the State Of Cali
fornia Judgment affirmed with costs Opinion By
Mr.. Justice Holmes. iAir Justice Aiekenna tOok
no part in the decision u this case
Nos lo6 and lg. Hawaiian Trust Company. Lin
tied. ct al. executors &c, appellants vs.. Heinrich
Martens Won Holt ct al. trustees appeals from tht
Supreme Court Of the Territory Of Hawaii; decree.
affirmed, with costs. Opinion BY Alr. Justice
Holmes
No. 3ss William J. Mozley. evaporation. &c
vs., Henry L. Hertz, collector q internal revenue
&c. on a certificate from the United States Circn
Court Of Appeals for the Seventh circuit; first
question answered Ia the Affirmative Opinion b.
Mr. Justice McKennA