The Miller press. [volume] (Miller, S.D.) 190?-current, 1910-12-08
NEED OF ECONOMY POINTED OUT
Has Little to Say About Tie Tariff---W Work on
Panama Canal Is Rev:ewed---No Change
in Anti Trust Laws---Irterstate
Commerce Laws Are Discussed.

each department chief 70 reduce the
estimated cost Of his department for
the ensuing fiscal year ending June
so, 1912. l say this in order that con.
gress may understand that these est.
mates thus made present the smallest
sum which will maintain the denart.
ments, bureaus and Offices of the gov.
ernment and meet its other obliga,
lions under existing law, and that a
cut OF these estimates would result
IN embarrassing the executive branch
or the government In the performance
OF its duties. This remark does not
apply to the river and harbor esti-
mates. except to those for expenses of
maintenance and the meeting of obi.
cations under authorized contracts,
nor does il apply to the public build.
ing bill nor to the navy building pro-
gram. OF course, as to these con
gress could withhold any part or all
or the estimates for them without in
terfering with the discharge of the or
binary obligations of these functions
OF its departments, bureaus and Of
fees.
THE final estimates for the year
ending June 80, 1912, as they have
been sent to the treasury on Novem,
Der % of this year, for the ordinary
expenses Of the government, including
those for public buildings, rivers and
harbors, and the navy building pro.
gram, mount to $780, 94, O13.12. This
is $52, 1854, SS7.36 less than the an.
preparations for the fiscal year end.
ing June 80, 1911. 1t is $16.SS3,l53.44
less than the total estimates. includ.
Ing supplemental estimates submitted
to congress by the treasury for the
year l9l1, and is $5,574, $50 SO less
than the original estimates submitted
by the treasury for 1911.
These fiugres do not include the
appropriations for the Panama canal
the policy in respect to which ought
to be, and IS, to spend as much each
year as can be economically and eff.
fectively expended in order to com.
plete the canal as promptly as posi-
bic, and therefore, the ordinary mo-
tive for cutting down the e of
the government does not apply to ap-
preparations for this purpose.
Against the estimates OF expendi.
lures, S64O,494 ,013.12, we have estimat-
ed receipts for next year $3.50, 900, 900,
making a probable surplus of ordinary
receipts over ordinary expenditures of
about $50, 900, 900, or taking into &C.
count the estimates for the Panama
canal, which are $50, 920, 847.69 and
which will ultimately be paid in bonds,
1t will leave a deficit for the next
year of about $1,000, 900, If congress
shall conclude to fortify the canal"
The Tariff.
The President devotes but little
space to the subject of the tariff law,
and Of It he says
The schedules of the rates of duty
in the Payne tariff act have been sub.
jected to a great deal OF criticism,
some of 1t just, more of it unfounded.
and to much misrepresentation. The
act was adopted in pursuance of a
declaration by the party which is re-
sponsible for it that customs bill
should be a tariff for the protection
or home industries, the measure of
the protection to be the difference be.
tween the cost of producing the i'm
ported article abroad and the cost of
producing 1t at home, together with
such addition to that difference as
might give a reasonable profit to the
home producer. The basis for the
criticism of this tariff is that in re.
spect to a number Of the schedules
the declared measure was not follow.
ed. but a higher difference retained or
inserted by way of undue discrimina.
ton in favor of certain industries and
manufactures. Little, If any. of the
criticism of the tariff has been direct.
ed against the protective principle
o stated; but the main body of
the criticism has been based on the
attempt to conform to the of
protection was no honestly and sin.
cerely adhered to-"
The Tariff Board.
The president refers to the appoint.
ment of a board Of experts to investi.
gate the cost of production of various
articles included In the schedules OF
the tariff, and says:
The tariff board thus appointed
and authorized has been diligent in
preparing itself for the necessary in
yestigations. The hope of those who
have advocated the use of this board
for tariff purposes is that the question
OF the rate of a duty imposed shall
become mor of a business question
n less OF a political question, to be
ascertained by experts OF long train
ing n accurate knowledge. The
hai In business and the shock to bust.