The Richmond Virginian. (Richmond, Va.) 1910-1920, 1910-10-05

that no properly qualified Demo crat
eoald be debarred. However, he saw
no objection 10 the suggestion from
the Tenth district committeeman.
Prior to the adoption of the amend
ment Colonel Day and Sheriff Crem-
we'll when questioned on the subject,
said they wcre not ready te express
an opinion whether the primary If
held. should be open 70 ali They
wanted time 10 confer with other
neraht al their committee
Run Young Again.
IL j. expected that W, "a Young.
vhu Vas awarded the certificate Of
nomination over Congressman II, =.
Maynard oH the tace OF the returns
trCtn the last primary, Will again IL
"A rardtdat. Tor EhC nomination. In
some quarters. however, il Is reported
that the Norfolk ring allied with the
N"flaih county fusipnists. may pick
another candidate To back instead of
Young. This element realizes the han
dicap that has been placed upon their
man as a result st the fraud diselcs-
urts and they are luly cognizAnt ~
the fact that their taNorite would get
practically no aid from the citizens
movement. 1; is limited that the ring
tnay settle au Cntone! George 6. CAN
all, AhO i in "a receptive mGud for
the nomination So FAR rs can lac
learned however Colonel Cabeil has
songat no assistance from this quar-
Ter and ii given him II VIII doubtless
come without solicitation Whether
Congressman Maynard re-enters the
heiG Wy probable be determined by
htnsel t/and supporters before the end
of the Veek
Lawyers Have Their INNING.
4 NJa4 LTD
the session of the State committee
TUESDAY night, ana We're attentive lis
teuees throug hot4t the proceedings. es-
pec!atiy while their respective counsel
aud attorneys fot the CITIZENS of Nor
frik summed up the various points at
issue following the reading ot the. re-
port from the investigating commit
tee. L the TWO hours and half al
Iott1d- them lawyers practically
reh, arsed all the essential details III
VOWED ia the inf estigatlou.
Young counsel argued that the
certificate Of nomination should go
10 their client. Attorneys for Ma!
naFd asked that Ii new primary he
held. restricted himself and Young
Counsel Ter the citizens urged adop-
tioH 81 the report declaring che pri-
MARY DuH and void Furthermore
they asked that both Maynard and
y "tHnE be excluded from another CON
test..
Attorneys Who Argued
Nat 7. Green and X Randolph
INeks were the attorneys who pre-
secuted YpHngs side, Maynard was
represented by Robert W ShultIce
and r j Wool Attorneys for the
citizens VIM spoke were h. A. Biiisoiy,
James Il Martin and Bradcn Naude-
Yeuter.
Wh.n the. lawyers had concluded
the report al the probefs vas adopted
without discussion, there being only
che dissenting VOICE, The committee
man voting IN the negative vas Paul
Garrett, Of Leesharg
Ibe report, which was read ~
Chairman MCINTYRE. contained no re-
Communications in connection With a
new primary or convention. 1t msre-
Is recommended that the August pri-
mary u" declared null aud void The
report was adopted On motion III
Judge T. T. W Duke, ef charlottes-
}iile
Shortly f,efoIe Adjournment the
Stats committee elected r. Gray Wi.
Hamss # Vim hester. as Il member 81
The Egav fs,"nl TIA seventh district
in piaceFaf = H Purcell deceased.
Comnilteenen Present.
Stat@ committeeman present At the-
meeting Were a. folj6Ws: j VI. Cur.
tis, K. H. Ailworth. r. T. cole. FIRST
district, G. fentan Dag W. W. Sale
pr- Z * Hope J, l. West. "A, &
Cromwell Second district; f. l.. G
Scott clyde w. saunders, Manly II
Barhes simon Solomon, Third dis
eticft Robert Gillian. i. H. Morris
T ] -Argin. J. Taylor Thompson
Fourth district X \ James t'tft n