Arizona republican., 1910-05-05

and that as Shindelbower had describ- ed in the case of the young men whose names he did not know the three of them had gone to the show and afterv.srd Shindelbower and Smith went to the oregon corral See by said that the night Shindelbower did not go into the saloon but had given him fifty cents to buy pint oi whiskey.
 This testimony was corroborated by smith
 Another witness was Joe Claude who said that about the time of the alleged purchase Of the whiskey by Shindelbower he was in the Buckeye country where Shindclbower told him that he was going to Phoenix to gath CT testimony against the saloons by buying whiskcy of them. He said that ]. W. Canning rrs to pay him se.5o a day for his time and tlo for every saloon put out of business.
 The defendant himself took the stand at the night session and under went mercilness grilling at the hands of District Attorney Bullard. His testimony regarding the purchase of the liquor p,}s quite different from that at the former hearing. In the first place he had a definite day fixed. February which he said was subse- qucnt to the time that Scebv bought whiskey for him. but he admitted that the movements on the night he was with the two more or less mythical young men whose names he had never heard.
 In the course of the examination he sworc with the greatest positivencSs that all this happened on the night oC January ,. He also introduced new character into the case, Willard Sales who had walked with him as he was coming from the alley in the rear of the Casino to the front where the two young men were.
 Finally in pretcnded disgust at the contradictions of testimony. District Attorney Bullard threw up luis hands and announced that he was done with the witness. on redirect examination Attorney LangSton asked him if Dis trict Attorney Bullard had not in the preparation for the previous hearing told him that if was not necessary tu
 
 objected that it was painful to him to have it recalled how the boy had de ceived him in the first instance The boy was allowed to answer saying that the district attorney had so told. s
 Attorney Langston offered as an ex- hibit crumpled piece of paper on both sides of which something had been scrawlcd. It had been presented to him by Charles Shindclbower a brother of the defendant who said that it had been given him by Joe Claude that afternoon with the statement that he did not wish to appear against Frank Shindelbower for fear of get ting pinched. But he wanted some money and wanted the defendant to meet him on the stairs. After consid- erable debate as to which side of the document should be admitted and a decision by the court that both sides would have to come in or none it was presented and read. It seemed to have To bearing on the explanation that had been made concerning it. After its admission George Smith took the stand for the defense and said that he had seen Claude give it to Shindel- bower and had heard him say that he oId not want to appear against Frank Siindelbower but Smith had not heard him say anything about fear of being pinched.
 There Was some other testimony of an unimportant character and the jury was put under the charge of the baiIiff