The Washington herald., 1910-06-10
Equity Court No. I.
JUSTICE ANDERSON.

dGEAiAb aAHEftAoVsft
Nc. 2ilN. Rhodes vs. Rhodes uis reiurrsole
June II.
No 9I7. Johnston e; al. vs. CLARK ct al; de-
cree pro c0nfess0
40 D3l SomsrTille et al vs.. American Realty
Company; certain payments ordered.
No. &S2. McAdoO e. al vs.. HoTmisy; case con
frmed.
No. &gg Grinder ct al. vs.. Richardson. T.. Ct
al; J. Darlington aud John Quinn appointed
trustees 70 sell; bond. $500
No. Gl70 Parrish rs. Darlington guardian 40
No. as72 wilson vs.. Wilson; leave granted to
hle amended bill
No. zlG Fetter vs.. Fetter ct al. guardian sd
iitm appointed Attorneys. W. J. Lam6ert-H' T.
No Z7ll. smith vs. Lancaster: submitted. AttOr-
neys. r. A. Ford-GoTdon & Gordon and J. R.
ThusstCH.
No. 257s Semmes- Kelly Company Us. Sanitary
Grooery Company order releasing bond and making
new bond for $500. Attorneys, WoI & ROSENBERG
L. H David and J j. Darlington
No Zao95 Berkeley rs. Chillum Castle Realty
Company; sale confirmed and references to auditor
Attorneys T. F. Colloday and H. II. Berkeley
No 900 In re Hilw0rth Jones. order changing
name Attorneys. E. {. Dutton and G. A. Maddox
Notice.-There viii be cal Of the equity term
calendar for June on Friday June To- 1910, at
10 a. N.
Assignment for June 70. Motion;
No. 4sl.-Hawkins vs., Libby. Attorneys, toloert'
Stewart Collins & Hemans-Boyd
No sss Albert vs.. LAnnon e al Attorneys.
Baker. Sheehy & Hogsn-Burke Lambert
No. $50 lockwood Us. lockwood. Attorneys.
Tucker s Bailey-English & Lockwood
Ne. 49, ColbuTn IS. Evans. attorneys Sies-
Darlington. Thomas. Wilson Huidekoper.
No. 49, DUrfee Durfee. ATTORNEYS, Bladder
stone & F0WleT-TobrneTs
No. lss. Brownies. Brown. Attorneys Rosenberg
Ballinger & Furbershaw.
No 5Ol Poloni vs. Broome. Attorneys. steArman
& Loughran-
In re estate Of Charles White Attorneys, Bond
-AfcNeiu.
No sos. Wilson vs. Wilson. Attorneys. Frisby-
Fleming s Parser.
No 500. swan Is. Swan ct al Attorneys Frisbg
No so. Block vs. Famous Clothing Company.
Attorneys. Tobriner, shinn & Dsrlington-WoR &
David
No. 81. Hall vs. Han. Attorneys Csningon-
I TAYLOR.
No 81 johnson rs. Johnson et al. Attorneys
Sulliyan-Doyle & Toomey.
No. SIS Dury & Pressy et al. AttEneyS BaldeT
ston-Tucker and KENYON & Leighton
No. 5l4 Relish - Champion Coated Paper Com
pany. Attorneys. Whestiey-Doualds0n-
No 5ls Mcconnell vs. Mcconnell. Attorneys
Hayell-Gies.
No. SIC DYER vs.. Faulkner. Attorneys. Barnard
& Iohnson-tiies.
No SIT. Upshrr vs.. Upshur. Attorneys. Mar
tin-Laskey.
No. SIS. Tucker vs. Tucker Attorneys, HeEnsns &
Pugll-King & Neil.
No. $40 Cristofsni vs.. Cristofaui. Attorneys. JEFF
fords & Beall-Taylor.
No so spillmsn vs. Fisher. Attorneys. Ridoui
& GeTtman-Hiil & Gardner.
No 81 England vs.. Midway. Attorneys. Howard
& Daish-Ieckie Fulton s. Cox.
No. 80 Mullihn ct al. vs. Baltimore Skate Man
ufaciuring Company Attorneys. Church-Henderson
No, 90 In re Amos A. Roper. Attorneys. Yeat
/ mau-Behrend.
/ No s2i Brown vs. Brown. Attorneys. Richard
son & Polisrd-Trlitt.
No. SIS Cave Us. Cave Attorneys. Thomas
Easby-Smith
Ne. G6. Shelly vs. Butler. Attorneys, Poe. Fay
/ and Putnam-Roheson & Baker.
/ No. ST. Ienoyitz vs.. Richards Attorneys, Bend
I heira-Thomas