Omaha daily bee., 1910-01-02

manifested, there is no reason why the
order revoking his authority until he does
comply with the reasonable requirements
of the court may not be made 10.
6. Under q citation to an attorney OF
this court requiring him to appear before
the court on a day and hour designated TO
with for contempt on account OF the IAN.
guage contained in" a brief in support OF
a motion for rehearing, filed IN me Office
Of the clerk Of the court, it is within the
jurisdiction of the court to indefinitely
suspend such attorney from practice.
I Z. A part of the language used and pre-
sented in the brief referred to is set out
in the opinion and it is held to be the
duty of the court to take notice OF the
same and to apply the required disciplinary
penalty.
8. The Judgment of suspension was made
Indefinite" as stated from the bench, IN
order that II at any time respondent maui
the necessary retraction and explanation
to relieve and remove the contemptuous
quality Of the language used the judgment
moved, no intention of permanent disbar-
ment or even of a suspension for a DEFINITE
time being intended. Until such time as
respondent makes the proper ana usual
amends, the order will stand as made.
Burrowes against CHICAGO. Burlington &
Quincy Railroad company. Reversed and
remanded. Barnes. j.
Snyder against Collier. Reversed with
directions. Root, j.
Wentz-Bates Mercantile company against
Union Pacific Railroad company. Reversed
and remanded. FawCett, j.
Warner against Sohn. Affirmed. Rose,
j., Reese, c. j., dissenting. -,
Metzger against Royal Neighbors of
America. Appeal dismissed. Per curiam.
Watkins against smith. Affirmed, Let
ton, j., Fawcett, j., dissenting.
Tate & Ehrhardt against Loney. Re-
Versed and remanded for further proceed
lngs. Root, j.
State ex rel Jackson against Wilson.
Affirmed. Rose, J.
Langenfeld against Union Pacific Rail-
road COmnanV. Reversed and Temanupn for
further proceedings. Letton, J.
Sewa,l against Wilton. on motion to
dismiss motion sustained. Per curtain.
Holmes against State. Reversed and re-
manded. Barnes, j.
Boddeo against State, Reversed and re-
handed. Barnes, j.
Vogel against Rawley. Affirmed. Dean, ].
White against Mccullough. Reversed,
license cancelled. Reese, G. j.
Mercantile Incorporating company against
Junktn. Affirmed. Root, j..
State eX rel Buchee against Whitmore.
Writ allowed. Root, j.
Following are rulings for motions for re-
Burkel against Norton. overruled.
Kyle against Chicago, Burlington &
Quincy Railroad company. Overruled.
Loosing against Loosing. Overruled,
Nilsson against Chicago, BURLINGTON 4
Quincy Railroad company. Overruied'
O'Shea against BTuenig. OVerruled.
Fruit Dispatch company against Gi.lnsky,
Opinion modified. Motion for rehearlng
Young against Rohrbough. Oral argu-
ment ordered on motion for rehearing at
second sitting In January, 1910.
Bingaman against Bingaman. Overruled.
Beckman against Lincoln a. Northwestern
Railway company. Overruled.
Wilkinson agRinst Lord. Overruied.
Fromholz against McGahey. Overruled.
state ex rel Love against Cosgrove. over
ruled.
orders
McClanahan against Chamberlain Motion
of appellee. Florence N. Dew, for extern
sion OF time to file briefs sustained; al
lowed until December %, 1903.
Hargloroad against C., j. az .. h Co.
Stipulation TO dismiss allowed; appeal dis
missed at costs Of appellant; mandate 70
issue instanter.
Gundy against Observation-Disclosures Co
Stipulation allowed; appellee allowed TIL
February I. 1910, TO serve and file answer
briefs; appellant allowed thirty days there.
after 10 file reply briefs.
Aurora State Bank against Payes-Eames
Elevator. Stipulation In re briefs allowed
clerk directed to enter taxation for appel
liant briefs.
Peck against Garfield County. Appiica.
ton Of appellant for additional time e
file briefs allowedi time extended TO Jan.
uary 10. 1910.