Weekly journal-miner., 1910-10-26
.SPARKLERS FLASH IN DISTRICT
 COURT
CFrom Tuesdays Daily)

l '4Nt OOu4G ytSNoiNoJ morning at o'clock in regular ses sion, and will resume this morning at the same hour.
 Among the decisions rendered by Judge Doe was an order made dis solving the injunction in the case of Margaret Melborn vs. Sheriff Smith and Justice of the Peace McLane. By this decision diamonds alleged to have been owned by the plaintiff, will not be disposed of.
 The case attracted considerable mo- toriety when the legal trouble was in its incipiency. The diamonds were purchased, it is alleged, by a man and given to the woman, without be- ing paid for, and later were secured by Sheriff Smith on a search war rant. Since their recovery the prop erty has been kept in his possession, hence the suit, when the plaintiff at tempted to secure the sparklers.
 The diamonds are valued at $325, and were secured from the c. B. Linn jewelry store, and, it is said, presented to the woman. By this de- eision of the court they will ulti- mately reach the owner.
 Judge Doe eombed the calendar of eases that have been on the docket for several years, in many instances, and made the following orders:
 Stricken from the calendar, the cases of Mrs. Willis Hunter vs. H. D. Stuthman ct ux, and Wagner & Scott vs. Venator & Scholey, a garn. ishment.
 Among those eases continued for the term were the following:
 R. H. Burmister & Sons Co. vs. Joe Hobbs, a garnishment.
 Henry B. Clifford ct al "a petition for the dissolution of the Great Bel eher-Bullwhacker Gold Co.
 Henry B. Clifford & Co.,, a petition for the dissolution of the Queen of Arizona Copper co.
 Henry B. Clifford & Co.,, a petition for the dissolution of the Henry B. Clifford & Co. .
 Henry B. Clifford & Co., petition for the dissolution of the Great Bel cher Gold Mines Co.
 Prescott National Bank vs. The Model Gold Mining Co.,, an attach ment.
 LeRoy Anderson, Trustee, vs. The Yavapai Copper Co.
 R. H. Burmister & Sons Co. vs. Elm pire Gold Mining and Milling Go. following:
 Among the cases dismissed were the
 c. Newton Taylor vs. H. c. Belts.
 John V. Viekers vs. George F. Thornton.
 John V. Vickers vs. Burwell B. Lewis ct al.
 W. E. Pedley ct al vs. W. c. Bash ford ct al.
 William Yates vs. Charles F. Karns.
 W. W. Ross vs. The Central Ari- zona Telegraph Co.
 J. N. witherell vs. E. Hubbard | Wetherell ct ux.
 Alexander Thompson ct ux vs. Frank Heisler and George Heisler.
 Anna c. Faulker ct al vs. c. W. Ellis.
 R. E. Daggs vs. Benjamin Gold man.
 Joseph Dougherty vs. William Dull in, attachment.
 Fred W. Williams vs. Storm Cloud Limited, of England.
 Prescott Lumber Go. vs. Arizona Homestead Mining and Milling Co.
 J. L. Fisher vs. James A. Melvin ct al.
 Edward s. RapellO ct al vs. The Weaver Placer Co. ct al.
 Edward s. Rapello ct al vs. The Orc Morillo Placer Co. ct al.
 Silas E. Fuller vs, Rich Hill Placer Co.,. attachment.
 Orrin F. Place vs. Noah c. Shek- sls.
 Calla Pearl Winckelmann vs. Chas. A. Winckelmann.
 Mrs. Mary Kuchler vs. August E. Born, attachment.
 George c. Ruffner vs George L. Merritt, garnishment.
 Sarah A. Fisher vs. John G. Camp oell ct al.
 Ed. H. Thompson vs. G. W. Vol Eerton, Congress Gold Co.,, garnishee. Katie McKinnon vs. Colin Tim mons
 W. ". Vanderbilt vs. James A.