The Kendrick gazette. [volume] (Kendrick, Idaho) 1892-1968, 1910-09-30
IMPROVEMENT OF WATERWAYS
WILL DEVELOP RESOURCES
OF EVERY SECTION.
FREIGHT CARRIED CHEAPLY
Make Direct Saving in Cost of Trans
Portation by the Water Routes, and
Indirectly Serve to Lower Railway
Carrying Rates.

lGl ways freight luOTe CuGdpIy
than the railways do or can, and that
they compel the railways to carry
freight more cheaply than they other
wise would, making saving of hun
dreds of millions of dollars a year, even
under present conditions, and indicat-
ing vast increase in that saving If all
waterways should be improved. And
then the surprising assertion was
made that the surest way to enlarge
the business and increase the profits
Of the railroads of the United States
is to improve the waterways of the
United States. The best guide to the
future is the experience of the past,
SO let us see what has actually hap
pened to railways when waterways
have been improved.
That the improvements in the chan
nels and harbors Of the lakes have
| been of great benefit, both to the rail
| ways which parallel their shores and
! to those which run from lake cities to
| the interior, is a fact so plain that
! it needs no argument to support it,
| There are no more prosperous and
profitable roads in the country than
those that serve the region tributary
| to the lakes. But no one questions
the wisdom of continuing the improve
ment of the lakes, or of our ocean
harbors. The real question is as to
the Improvement of our rivers, and il
we wish to study the effect Of river
improvement, either on railway reve-
nues or national development, we
| must go to EurOpe
Results in Bohemia.
During the fifteen years that i'm
provements were under way on the
Elbe river, in Bohemia, the river traf-
tic, as natural result of the better
channel, increased fvefold. But traf
fic on the competing railways in
creased still more largely and the div
idends on the main line, from Tepitz
to Aussig, rose to 1G per cent. per
anDum.
Similar results followed the canal.
cation of the River Main, from May
ence, on the Rhine, to Frankfort,
which was finished in the latter part
of 1886. The river traffic, which
amounted to only 10000 tons in that
year, began to grow and has kept on
growing, being 1,273,000 tons in 1902.
There are two railroads between
Frankfort and Mayence, one ON each
side of the river. What happened to
them? Did their business show a Sc
rious falling off? Or were they forced
into the hands of receiver? On the
contrary their traffic, which was 911.
600 tons in 1886, also began to grow,
and by 1902 had reached 10000
tons, or more than double what it was
when the railroads had practical
monopoly of the business Of Frank
fort.
The mere statement of the in
creased tonnage does not tell the
whole truth OF the matter, for the
tonnage was not only more than
doubled in quantity, but greatly
raised in grade, so that it could pay,
and did pay, a much higher rate per
ton per mile.
!, Fine German Waterways.
Practically all the railways of Ger
= many are state owned and state oper-
ated. Out of a total of $4,000 miles.
in round numbers, only about $500
miles are operated by private COM
panies. Germany also has one of the
finest systems of waterways in the
world, and study of the balance
! sheet of the German railway system
shows that the results which followed
the improvement of the River Main
are not an exception, a mere coinci
dence, but are the natural outworking
of principle of general application.
In the calendar year 1907, after paying
for operation, maintenance, repairs.
renewals, new equipment. interest on
bonds, contribution to the sinking
/ fund, and every other item which the
most careful bookkeeping required to
be charged up, the German railways
turned $164, 100000 of absolutely net
: revenues into the treasures of the
: various states. This was $5,050 per
I mile of line operated, while the CORE
r spending figure on United States rail,
r ways for the fiscal year 1906-7 was
only $1,9G7-a little over one-third as
much.
Much the greater part of the total
S revenue of the German states is de-
rived from their railways, II cents out
of every dollar received by Prussia in
1907 being SO obtained. Yet German
statesmen keep on, year after year
spending money earned by their rail
: ways in building and improving water
: ways to compete with those same rail
I ways, on which they depend as the
l principal source of national income
, In the light of the facts given above
, 1t will not do to say that these Ger.
man statesmen do not know what they
are about. On the contrary, they are
acting, as has been well said. "in fur
therance Of a policy the wisdom of
; which time and experience have fully
: confirmed"
Always and everywhere the result;
is the same-the improvement of a
waterway is a benefit to competing
railways. For this result, as for any
| 4fh ta III NJ