The Oroville weekly gazette. [volume] (Oroville, Wash.) 1905-19??, 1910-10-21
IULDBU|LDASMELTER
/ Columbus, Ohio, Promoter
Explains the Proposed
Proposition.
l INDEPENDENT COMPANY
70 Do Custom Work Is the Idea
Advanced in Order to Help
Local Mine Owners.

Allow me to lay before the readers
dvour paper, and through them all who
4 radius of twenty-five or more miles
rom center not distant from Night
hxk are interested in mining invest
uents. the outcome of which is de-
pudent upon a smelter. My late visit
numerous mining enterprises within
The territory named, coming in touch
nth both properties and people, con-
rinces me that it is not necessary to
usit longer for conditions inviting a
shelter proposition. The time is here
the conditions also-for consistent
movement, making available the many
hyorable features to erect smelter
plant. This cannot help being very
Foftable investment. This impress
sion seems to be about unanimous in
The mind of those interviewed. | will
give the concensus of opinion as to the
katures of smelter proposition.
First-It must be an independent
| melter under the control of no mine,
or mining company absolutely void of
il concessions, franchise or special
privileges. No one person, nor any
one mining company, need offer any
money, or other considerations, putting
the smelter company under any obli-
stions Already one person has Of
fered $1,000 for centain things. He may
eet what he wants and the smelter
Company may get his $1,000, but neither
ne money nor the suggestion will
have anything to do with the will Of
the smelter company.
Second-It must be custom smelter,
and it is desirous that it's stockholders
be principly persons who are interested
ina treatment plant for are also OF
heir property thus making it doubly
woftable-frst the smelter profits and
iecond the profits on their ore treated
II is not unreasonable to say that if
this movement is carried through it
can make fifty dividend paying mines
out of such as are now in need of
imelter in the territory referred to.
II this is even partly true who among
the many thousands holding mining
stock would not assist in making their
stocks valuable by investing in the
smelter.
4 will here mention "a few of the
many mines that would be profited in
this smelter proposition. The Night
hawk, Favorite, Ruby Number One,
Prize, Six Eagles, Caaba, Lone Pine,
Peerless, Rich Bar, King Solomon,
Mountain Sheep, Colder Zone, Pima
Gle, Copper World, Copper World Ex-
tension, Q. s., Mineral Hill, Wehes-
vile groups, Kimberley, Everett, Trim
ity, 10th Parallel, Golden Chariot, kel-
sey group, Dividend, o. K, Owasco,
Grant, Bimetalic, Crystal Butte, Apex,
Delate, Nelson, Buckeye.
The location of the smelter will be
chosen by location committee who
will perform this duty in the interests
of the smelter company, which cannot
help being in the interests Of the great
est number of mines, for all things
relative to the success of present and
future plant will be taken into consid-
Grafton. There is no doubt as to the
future growth of plant of this kind
There is no doubt as to the vast amount
of ores accessible. The original ca
pacity of the plant will depend upon
the means subscribed and the judg-
ment of capable counsel who will
have the advantage of experience and
knowledge.
The group of anticipated investors
who would thus be benefited are scat
tered over large part of the east as
we'll as some west. One object of this
article is to get the reader and those
associated with him in mining ven
lures interested in taking the matter
up, and in order to do this you are ad
vised to write Monroe Harman, Orc
vile, Wash, Manager Jones, Nickle
Plate mines, Hedley, B. c., G. A. An
drus, Nighthawk, Wash, John Went
worth, Loomis, Wash, w. A. Snow
Columbus, Ohio, or the undersigned,
Columbus, Ohio.
This movement for smelter in ne
way forestalls the erecting of mills OF