The Washington herald., 1910-12-06
DISTRICT COURTS.
Court of Appeals.

~RAF----~e
Present: All. q
Admissions: Lswrenee J. Roster and Villa
W. simmons
No 2l7. Hayes vs.. Conger ct al; mo,lon
dismiss submitted by Mr. Webster Baliinger. q
toEney for apIellees. IN support Of motion.
Nos Z14 Moses a son Is. Hayes. and Zzl7
Hayes Vs. Conser Ct al. argument commenced by
Mr. Web7fer BangeT for the appellants in Z2ii
and for aplellers Ia III argument continued BIZ
Mr.. L. II. David for appellee in 2zl4 and for APP
pellant ia Zl7, argument continued by Mr. K. B..
Behrend for appellee in ia and for appellant IN
III; argument commenced by Ar. Webster BALM
ger for appellants IN Hi4 and for appellee IN III
No. MA Washington Terminal Company Dis
triet Of Columbia. and 30. zl75 District Of C0lum-
biS vs. Washington Terminal Company; argument
commenced by MIR ]. W. 'Yerkes for appellant
In 2l74 aad for appellee IN ms argument CON
menced by AR. +. ID. Stephens for appellee in Zi7s
and 81 appellant in 2l75; argument concluded b.
Sir. G. Z. Hamilton for appellant in 2l7i and foi
appellee in 275.
No. ZIG. Davis Us. United States: continued. {
Nc. Z03. Wall &C. vs.. Oyster e. al. affirmed
Opinion By Sir. Chief Justice Shepard.
No. ZIG Billings Fs. Field; reversed. Opinion
Mr.. Justice Robb.
No. 2a Goldsmith ct al vs. Valentine:
Tersed.
No. 2ls. Pitchiynn VS. District Of CoIunb.E
affirmed. Opinion by Mr. Justice Robb-
No. Z5. Fletcher Us. Lipseomb: appeal d
missed Opinion By Mr.. Justice RObb
ion By Mr.. Justice Van Orsdei. :,
No. zles. Magaw ", Huntlsy e al; affirm .
Opinion by Mr. Justice Van Orsdel.
No. Zls0. United States rs. Title Guaranty ar
Surety Company; reversed. Opinion by Mr.. Justi
No. 27s Alexander vs. Alexander: afhrne.
Opinion by Mr. Justice Van 0rsiel.
No. A3o Male "a. Oyster ct all affirmed. OPP .
ion BY Mr.. Justice Van Orsdel.
| No. 2s57. ". w. Kimball Company " WIliAH
a a,-s.- - q Nor nrzEnf
Patent appeals: a
No 61 In re application Of McElroy; afarnf
l Opinion b. sir. Chief Justice Shepard. -,
No. 672 swartBood vs.. Barnes; affirmed. Opanf J,
/ by Mr. Jusiiee Van Orsdel,
No. ga. In re application II Decker; aftrme,s
| Opinion by MIR Justice Van OTsde
No. COL Schneider vs. Drggsi affirmed. Oranio-
/ BY Mr. Justice Robb.
No. co Booth e al. vs. Harrzn ct al affirmed
| Opinion By AlT. Justice R0bb.
No. 65. IN application Of Wilcox & Co.; ar
hmed OPINION by Mr. Justice Robb.
No. GO Rohisehung Va. Handiges; affirmed 0psn
| ion By Mr. Justice Van OTsdel-
| No. So. IN re application Of Ratiscani affirmed
| Opinion by Mr Justice Robb.
! No. SO. Carter Medicine Company vs.. Barclay 1
Barclay; reversed. Opinion b. Mr. Justice Robb.
| No. Col. Slingiufi e al. Is. Maynard; TeFersed
| Opinion BY Mr.. Justice Van Orsdei.
| No Co. IL re Application q Merritt e. al: ar
filmed. Opinion b. Mr.. Justice Van Orsiel.
| va w. &tAAlEV G g. - EA-lssiTteE4G t-pt+lA
! denied.
No sa In re application q Roselins: affirmed
| Opinion ly Mr., Chief Justice shepard
No ES. Dedo Fl al. vs.. Hutchinson: iudgnen
modified. Opinion ty Mr.. Chief Justice SheraTd.
| Assignments Tor Decenber Regular call:
| No. 2lS5. MetzEer vs. Kelly Ct al. AttorneT
Wallace-Thomas & White.
No HSs. Gilbert rs Secretary Of Interior. at
/ torneys. Balliugef-LaWler, Clements Wright.
No 492 Arlington Brewing Company vs.. BlueB
thai & Beckert Attorney, Bailey.
| No. 2is3. Southern Surety Company 70. Baglin
Attorneys. Darlington-BlEir.
Ne A94 George Es Ford. Attorneys Williams
/ Tucker. Kenyon d Macfsrisnd,
I No. 2s5. Brown vs. Philadelphia. Baltimore snt
| Washington Rsilrosd Company. Attorneys, Baker
0bear & 4Iiller-McKenuey q FlsnneIy.
No. ZS. Hutchinson Capital Traction Con
pany. Attorneys 1IatheT-Perry & Son and Dunlop
No. 2l4. Wilkinson Ct al. Mekmniie e al
Attorneys. poe-Ambrose & Rid0ut
No. 292 Michigan rs. Jaeger Attorneys Moal
ton & Ridout-Iambert & Yeatman.
No. 2se ChsloneT vs. Wsshingt0n Post Company
Attorneys, Ambrose Ridout-LambeFt & Yeatman