The San Juan islander. [volume] (Friday Harbor, Wash.) 1898-1914, 1910-03-25

cant and elect a speapar
MIN. His blum was nror, 70 Succeed
by the Democrats. Ever Called
up. Had the insurgents stn man lined
On Inat vote to declare the leu os by Us
cans 70 elect speaker. Ca mar Va.
with all the name implies uwaan.llonisn,
Deen as dead as the men WIN "'uld have
fore the flood. In the n nMU lived be.
Cannon and Cannonism ,r raoiic mind
SYNONYMOUS s;atoa mo They cannot be- seOSSGi l
, .,a.ed Dy any sort of incant.tt;;s asso.
legerdemain. We have, in t1in Or
tory, simply scotched Cannon :nls vic.
Killed 1t, and the net result i ~ not
people, If they really desire t 70 s mat the
with Cannonism, must do 90 " 40 away
Ing Democratic house 'o ny elect.
Payne Republican,, floor ,o.
Inc insurgents favored a ch reaaer--
the rules, but large majority Dha a1g in
IN Cannon's honesty and intso uuse.lleved
MS administration of the rnleS 'y and
also favor the members of tho p They
can party standing Together Aepubi.
, neve that hereafter the Rep puH be
VIZ oIoAu IOSoCQor. .euS
Il believe no further effort -
the rules will be made at tbiS % amend
OF congress and that there u, S session
Republican division on so.ca,,o ,i De no
gent lines" "'ieo lnsur.
Hayes (California)-"Tho h...,
been a great victory for the ne ",'ie mas
the insurgents. 1t is the o ora. and
tning that has happened for 1 fho
publican party in years. II mo- Ne
Republicans in control of tho h The
have revised the rules and th.t =; aouse
done within the Republican NEWS :" was
Poindexter (Washington), insur,,..
we have won great VICTOR gent s
Cannonlsm has not yet been en NJ Oal
wiped out. I voted against Cannanel
the last vote because I have alm %
been against cannon for sneaI0" "a!S
have been against Cannon ever a.. l
l nave been in the house. mads s'l ne
campaign on the issue of Cannon a iuy
Cannonism. I voted against him a sa
speaker OF the house last March ars tV1 =
saw no reason to change nv vote - !
day. OF course l would have ~. W
ferred that this question should pc ns.
nave been brought up at the time for
it was an inopportune time, but sin ,O
1t was presented squarely by tho pu,
Lesson resolution, Cannon or No rsn
non, l voted against Cannon. 7 ha~s
been not only against the rules in tho
house, but against Cannonism and can
non. | have always been against Con- sn
non for the reason that Cannon stands
for the same thing in the house tha,
Aldrich stands for in the senate. IA
stands for special privileges against
equality and for big interests and ths
money powers against the people, FL,
rules-I think we have won a big wiz
tory, of more Importance than ousting
Cannon from his throne"
Murdoch (Kansas), insurgent-"Our
victory will give back to the bouse
some of the power the speaker had
taken unto himself. AS for nv vote
against Cannon on the Burleson reso
luton, I have nothing to say except
that it explains ITSELF"
Lenroot (Wisconsin), insurgent-T
voted against Cannon for the position
OF presiding officer. have always con.
tended that he was unfit for the posi-.
ton. That is why voted for the Bur.
Lesson resolution. There is distinc.
ton between Cannonism and the rules.
/ have always been against Cannonism
as well as against the rules that were
in part only-responsible for the
tyranny that existed in the house"