The Washington herald. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1906-1939, 1910-03-15

| RASAS ~NHFt 81 me CGktSu StAtea
Present; The Chief Justice. Mr. Justice Harlan.
Ar. Justice Brewer. Mr. Justice White. Mr.. Justice
| Mckenn2. DIR, Justice Holmes. Mr. Justice Day
and Mr.. Justics Lartcn.
Horaee B. Stanton. Of Boston. Mas Henry S.
wardner. Of New York Cts. \. Y; Chaunoey c.
/ Parker. Of Newark. n J.. Thomas Park Brzdneld
| Of Grand Rapids. Mich: Robert Lynn Coz, OF
New York City. n. Y: Jack Beall. OF waxahachle.
Tex; Morris +. Frey. q Washington. D. C.: George
5. Jones, Of Macon, Ca; VoTIvn!oe Munger. Of An
sonia, Conn. james Lester QuacEenbuSh Of New
/ York city. y. Y; John Edward Mullin Of Kane
Pa: DeyereuK Milbum. Of New YORK City n Y:
/ Douglas Campbell, Of Cherry Valley, n y; John
/ q. Milbun, jr., II New YORK City, \, Y and
Thomas Leaning, q Philadelphia, Pa. were Id
mitted to practice.
No. 80 Edward C. Osborn and Joseph J. slO-
cum, As trustees DC. plaintiffs in error vs. Peter
| ffoyseth. IN euor to the supreme Court Of the
state u Minnesota; judgment affirmed with Costs.
Opinion By Mr.. Justice Luton. lMT. Justice Brew
I er took no part in the decision Of this case.
| No. So The Northern Pacific Railway Company.
plaintiff in error The STATE Of North Dakota
/ ex rel /. T. McCua. attorney general:
No. 5SA Great Northern Railway Company, plain
tia IN eTror vs.. Tie State OF North Dakota ex rel
I. +. McCae. attorney general: and
No 900. Minneapolis. St Paul and Saut Ste
Marie Railway Company plaintiff in esTOF, Va
The State Of North Dakota ex rel T. +. McCue.
attorney general in error 10 the Supseme COut
Of the State Of North Dakota judgments affirmed
with costs without pge5udicc opini0n by III. jus
tce Holmes.
No IS. Alberto win. doing business under the
name o. WI q Co. 81 al. appellants IS. Joaquin
Iornabelis doing business under the firm name Of
j. TUTnaholls & Co.. et al APPEAL from The District
Court Of the United States fog Porto Rico; decree
affirmed With COSTS Opinion by Mr. Justice White
No. 20 Thomas Franklin, plaintiff Ia eTTUr, vs..
The United Stats; IN error 10 the Circuit Court
Of the United states for the southern district OF
Nas- a
Opinion by Mr.. Chief Justice Fuller.
The Chief Justice announced that the court viii
take recess from Monday. the 2lst inst. 20 Mon
day April next
The Chief Justice also announced the following
orders II tbs court;
No. ~ Edward G. Lewis. plaintiff in error, vs.
The United States; IN error 10 the District Court
Of the United States for the Eastern district Of
Missouri Per euTiam Writ q error dismissed for
want Of jurisdiction.
No. IL. John h. Mallers. plaintiff IN error vs.
Commercial Loan and Trust Company; in error 70
the supreme Court Of the state Of Illinois Per
csriam; Writ Of error dismissed for the want Of
jurisdiction
No. -. Original. IL parte: In the matter Of
Arthur Hegett and Tom A Heating, petitioners
motion for leave 70 hie petition for writ Of
habess corpus denied
No. - Charles r. Heike. plaintiff in error. vs..
The United States; motion 20 Taeate allowance Of
writ of eTrur and s1peTse3eas denied without prel-
dice to motion TO dismiss the writ
No Original TX parte; IN the matter OF
Charles r. Heike. petitioner; motion for leave 70
file petition for writ Of mandanms granted and
the answer Of the district Judge Of the United
States for the District Of Vermont sitting in the
Circuit Court for the Southern district Of New
York. and Of the Circuit Court TO the petition for
the writ taken as return as % a rule entered on
the petition; rule made absolute thereupon, and
der granted directing respondents to enter Judgment
for The United States UPON tbs verdict with leave
70 defendant 20 plead over.
No 81. The United States. appellant vs.. Charles
T. EllcOtt ct al, &c. motions 10 dismiss OF affirm
and to remand Cor additional findings OF fact post
poned TO the hearing 4 the case its merits
No SOS. John A. Knott ct al. &c, appellants, vs.
Chicago. Burlington and Quincy Railroad Com
pany; and
No GIL. Chicago. Burlington and Quincy Rail-
road Company. appellant. vs. John A. Knott ct al.
&c; motion TO advance granted and cases assigned
70 be heard case GA the first Tuesday Of the
next term October ID, after the cases already as
sigued for that day.
No T6. Russell r. Herman. appellant. vs.
c. T. Elicit. United States marshal, sc;
No az. Flank w. BgOwn, appellant, W c. T. |
Elliott. United States marshal, &c; and
No US. l.. G. Moore appellant. Va C. T. Elliott |
United States marshal &c; motions 70 admit ap- |
pellants to bail severaly denied.
No. sos Sebald NJ. Hohl, petitioner vs. Nord- |
deutsehez Lloyd; petition for wit Of certorari TO
the United States Circuit Court Of Appeals for the
Second circuit denied
No. $40. Roland Z. Conklin. petitioner. vs. The |
Daimler Manufacturing Company ct al petition for |
wit Of eeTtioTaTi TO the United States Circuit
Court Of Appeals for the Second circuit denied.
No go The United States plaintiff in error 4
vs. Pierre Grimaud ct al and
No. s9l The United States, plaintiff IN error vs. l
Antonio lnda IN 20 the District Court Of the 1
United States for the Southern District Of Cali 1
foi1ia; judgments affirmed b. a divided court
Nos. l2i and l25, The Baltimore and Ohio South /
western Railroad Company. plaintiff il error. VS.. /
The United States; in e1roT TO the United States I
Circuit Court Of Appeals for the sixth circuit /
judgments affirmed by divided court and causes
Ismanded to the District Court Of the United States
for the Southern District Of Ohio.
No. 81. D. L. Henderson, trustee, &c. petitioner 1
vs. Sam Mayer; petition for wit az certi0rar 10 |
the United States Circuit Court Of Appeals for the
Fifth cirsIit submitted By Mr.. George S. Jones' in
behalf Of Mr.. John r. L. Smith. for the petitioner
No. 65s. II. g. Coca C0n,pany, plaintiff in error,
vs.. Frank II. Beecher ct al; submitted By Mr. Yer
renice Munger for the plsintin in error: no brief
fled for the defendants ia error.
No 80. Harry T. Hemdon Prosecuting Attorney
Of Clinton Comfy, No. ct al appellants rs
The Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway; and
No. Isl. John f. swanger. Secretary of State Ct
Missouri. appellant. vs. Ths AtchiSon. Topeka and
santa Fe Hallway Company appearance Of Come
Illus Roach. successor II John F. SWsngsT as sec
rotary of state Of the State If Missouri as party
appellant IN these cases. filed and entered. e. mo-
ton CT Mr. Elliott W, Major for the appellants
No l6l. Missouri Kansas and Texas Railway
COMPANY, plaintiff IN errcr " II. A. Hollan: mo- !
tons 20 dismiss affirm and for damages submitted
by Mr.. &. 4. Randen aid AlT. Judson H Wood for !
the defendant in error, in support Of the Motions
and by Mr.. James HageTman, AIR, Cecil II, Smith, /
and Mr.. J. NJ. Bryson ia opposition thereto.
No. IL. Missouri. Kansas and Texas Railway
Company plaintiff in error, vs.. Harry c. Wise;
motions to dismiss or affirm and for damages sub
mitted by Mr.. G. r. Randell and Mr.. Jutsan H.
WuUd for the defendant in in support Ct the
motions and by Mr.. James Hasenman. Mr. Cecil II
Smith. and Mr.. j. n BUson. for the plaintiffs in
error, in opposition thereto.
Nc. S2s Frank r. Waskey. petitioner rs. J. J.
petition fer wit q csrtiora4i to the
United States Circuit Court Of Appeals for the
Ninth circuit submitted b. MT. Albert Fink, sir.