The San Francisco call. [volume] (San Francisco [Calif.]) 1895-1913, 1910-02-18
SCRAPS OF LOVE
LETTERS TELL TALE
Wife Obtains Evidence for Dr.
vOrce From Fragments of
EpistIes on Roof

Six ardent love letters, torn up and
thrown away by Harry W. McDow, to
whom they were sent by Eleanor Wul-
zen, We're produced in Judge Van Nos
trand's court by Mrs. Laura McDow in
support of her petition for divorce. Dis
covered by her on a roof upon which
McDow threw them through window,
Mrs. Mellow had carefully pasted the
many scraps together until they pro-
vided strong evidence OF inidelity
against her husband.
Their residence was at 1915 Eddy
street, and Mrs. McDpw told of a flu
rious disturbance there one morning
last April, when McDow was elected
from the room of Eleanor Wulzen. Mrs
McDow, after this, found one little
scrap of letter in her room, which
had blown in from the roof, and max
ing an investigation, she discovered all
the telltale letters.
In her correspondence Miss Wulzen
addressed mellow as loved one" and
dearest and sent him oceans of love
and sweetest kisses
DO write oftener, sweetheart" she
urged in one epistle. Il love to get
your letters. 1t is just like you were
talking to me. Byebye. Here's a
great big kiss right square on the
mouth, and lots of love, too. from
yours, e"
Judge Van Nostrand granted the wife
divorce.
Albin J. Pollak, who owns an interest
in a Coalinga oil property, was granted
a divorce by Judge Hunt from Mary E.
Pollak on the ground of desertion. In
his first complaint he charged miscon-
duct with II. Barron, but this ground
was abandoned and an amended COM
plant filed alleging only desertion.
Pa won't permit it," said Gertrude
Campbell yesterday morning, when
Judge Graham asked if she desired ali
mony from Ralph E. Campbell, an cleo
trician, from whom she had just been
granted a divorce. Mrs. Campbell is
the daughter of Lawrence Vincent, the
auctioneer.
Under no circumstances would L al
low my daughter to take this fellow S
money" Vincent informed the court,
corroborating Mrs. Campbelrs state
ment. No alimony order was made.
Anna NJ Kirk was granted a divorce
by Judge Cabaniss yesterday from Ear
nest +. Kirk, the socialist attorney, on
the ground of desertion. Kirk was in
court and formally denied his wife's
accusation, but did not contest her
suit. They were married October 90,
1888, and Kirk left his wife September
u, 1908 Their child Robert, aged 3,
was awarded to the custody of the
mother, who was allowed SIS month
for the boys support and education.
Carl E. Lindsay, another we'll known
lawyer, was sued for divorce yesterday
by Mary A. ]. Lindsay. They were
married January l, 1884. The com
plant alleges constructive desertion.
charging that Lindsay has for more
than two years occupied a separate
room from his wife.
Charles Wesley Reed, the attorney
and former supervisor, whom Ethelyn
Minnie w. Reed is suing for divorce,
asked Judge Cabaniss yesterday to va
cate the restraining order obtained by
his wife tying up all his property. At
torney J. J. Dunno, representing Mrs.
Reed, said, however, that he was in no
mental condition to take up the mat
ter, having the Conboy murder trial on
his hands. It went over to this morn
ing, at which time Mrs. Reeds applica-
ton for alimony pending trial of the
case will also be taken up.
Divorces were granted yesterday as
follows:
from Ashbury W. Glaze, willful neglect;
Anna Johnson from Walter Johnson.
By Judge Troutt-Adelaide Loring
L
cruelty; Ernest D. dOmbrain from
Edith d'Ombrain, desertion.
Suits for divorce were filed yester-
day by:
Irma Szafesun against Alex Szafesun.
cruelty.
Eleanor L Reynolds against Charles
c. Reynolds, desertion.
Mae E. Gardner against Harry c.
Gardner, deSertion.
Emanuela Georgi Anicost against
Nick George Anicost, cruelty.
Litizzia Cristiani against Ottilia Girls
tiani, desertion.
Maud Koberstein against August NJ.
Koberstein, willful neglect.
Anna B. Strider against Ernest
Strider, desertion.
A. Florence Southland against James
Southland, desertion.
Arthur Z. Sinclair against Louise
Bruning Sinclair, cruelty.
Sophie Strasburg against Nathan j.
Strasburg, cruelty.