The Salt Lake tribune. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1890-current, 1910-11-01
i''.'' ''.''i-:-.-:.-:-:-..-ss.-::.-::-:-s.A4.., ''.''i-:-..-::.-::-:-.-s.-:.-:-:-sA4..

Ihat the church Republlc,,e
deal with the liquor inlersg,. =, en
TO debauch the voters, corr7,,t ~ a
ton and defeat law enfor.o us
the open charge Of F. q
councilman from the Thjr,, sna3
the floor OF the council chsu,s
day evening The charge u.s
by Mr.. Fernstrom in speaklne
resolution, found at the hcaa y
column. proposing the reduciIo, :.
number Of saloons by incrsas:,,
LIQUOR licenses.
MIR. Fernstrom also rci,s-,,.,
charge OF two years ago fl,st s.
publicans aud the liquor in,ercs,s s
state were In deal then ana h,
tally referred to Sheriff Sharp's ~ )
purity crusade by its right nsne L
In this case" said Mr.. Frrrt..
There is no dispute about The ri
tween the Republicans and ths r.
dealers. The bargain has been !
the votes have been promised Il,
money has been turned over 10 ~
the electorate"
II believe that the whole comu
is aware OF the conditions confr
u.s." said Mr.. Fernstrom. when i.
gan to speak TO his resolution. s
years ago q certain party (rnear!sr
Republican party received ss0.eaj 4
the liquor interests To run the q.
and staYe off legislation inimlcaI n
liquor interests, A similar sltnsfiz
lists today. Who Is responsible,
resolution goes 10 tine responsible
sons " is not right for any ons e
est, whether il be grocers OF saJu-'
to combine to buy an election. ur3
combination ought TO be dcfeattd
Must Fix Limit
TIN more or less opposed 10 Il
the number OF saloons. but when
conditions as these confron. us ar n
make n limit. We thought that b.
ing the license VIC would cufl1A
Increased. We ought tn serve d
upon the liquor dealers now shBt ~
tend TO do something so that theJ
say after election that they've ID
notice. or course. II the DcmoCab
VIC won't need this resolution. 3
VIC don't do something now vel
the same farcicel fight In the O.
Legislature as We saw two yam
Although the whole state, men, -
and children, the Mormon chnrl
everybody else, wanted prohlbitloa z
was no liquor legislation becarss
brewers had paid for protection
foreigners especially ought 10 o. -
out OF the liquor traffic.
Tho liquor interests are IN
and let us put 'em out il they
get out of their own accord. he
a party (mcaning the Republican
in league with the liquor interesS
It's members are crying that tne y
Gratis and the Americans are III
with the liquor men when thc -
that the liquor dealers and the h''
cans are fast bcdfcllows.
For Strict Regulation.
Mr.. Recdall said that while he des
favor prohibition. he thinks thar n7
tercsts OF the liquor dealers oaa
be preserved by strict rcgulauop. J.
are forcing prohibition upon tne'n5' IS
said MIR, Reedall II think IL
adopt this resolution and cied" W.
dives" said he. ,.,a5
Councilman Mckinney sla,~
while he doubted the WISDOM
at this time. WneI fsc<
SAVIOR of politics, yet he was ~ ' -
the curtailmcpt of the numoe!
and OF the strictest enforce,nsa,o ~ 4
liquor law, and the eliminnuoms a.
around which gather the VssiouS rssra
lie said that lie thought tlc rr1s,
sentiment ndp sr!s
Strong was because OF Inc .,dc, snlo-
ment of the law, and tnat su,,N,bla g
ment WAS not only the o,n bul 4
for the community rs WIZ Ior Ire NJ
IL was also the best tnine .ovc,on 10 of
men themselves, as tne mn mn, sniaar<
law by them created sIest M mind.
toward them In the pupllS; ;wnen zen, tlf .
publican par,y and the liquor "a r.
of two years ago, he SAID ~ osaI -
the blackesL and most disslas..sr dias .sry 4
In Utah history, and tnat tnS In -
the saloon element were No. nrohIbu
this wear to defeat not ON, ,nUam
but any legislation lookihs lIrltsr
more effectual regulation
Of the saloon.
Mr.. Halls View. 49,.
81 am for prohibition. but Mr. p
ls foo close 10 election. ~ ~ me 81.
'.Whilc the more a man rioMrced ie
or he is, I don't like to oe ,aTinctIon.
A stand on this lust oelose oelohsr al sl
.he reduction OF the npii'd and We y
create n monopoly: ciinnabls
want that. The most opIo o eysegs0
lure of this election IS sne cartons
oy the newspapers. so.ud md ir you
l disgrace to the cily, or rcadins
one OF the papers Wl.iiSJ WliJ mink Uss
II the others, you W"n w0'llG nsTs ui party 90
he had in the other parry Val d
..saI,,,ion vi L ''G Tor Presentation aieSui ur 81
Mr.. Fcrnstrom challensiiSus the
,npcFs nacEs of rhsn Se took W isssspSs iss
id the city OF crime ella claSih,eTe here. y
greatest farce ever ever seen e TbIuff.", sss s,,s
.epoot.s onpmocrstic member. N,ongIeeSed"
ested and nobody was s.pse would :
The raising Of tho lice licsnsr until 30
he number OF saiooi,,n i,,n,,tercsts " ~
N politics. th was MI Ferns''0"
.rgument. I'D that the mloss
81