The Salt Lake tribune. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1890-current, 1910-01-12

Tvs, in
ner su-
Rc board
Eiton as
designation
Bard and a
an inyesti-
"a of educa-
ilding super
6On was only
of the res
id rcsiena-
cation h"
time OF the
10, the board
finding, an
liDds of
rtor had
said
the facts
done Mr..
.cby fully
from any
that the
ffcred any
@any action
be it further
OF this rcsolu-
slutes and fur
it is under
eMr. Rridwcll's
H. occasion and
for introduction.
I'd him from any
any wrongdoing
gnduct OF his office.
Tent to Table.
F.aue moved the adoption
Ju Mr.. Thomas moved an
at il be tabled. Mr.. Moyle
is speech in favor Of the
Tc declared that he was
Vat there was no dishonesty
OF Mr. Bridwell. He did not
everything done by Bridwcli
Inn OF office. as lie believed that
wrong in some things. but he did
THAT a great injustice had been
dwell by permitting the charges
over him. lie stated that he
have been in favor Of completing
Hes,IgatIon hut SO far as the tesu,
Urni he was sure that the board
Pnot lost one cent through BridWeli,
he thought the board should eH-
- itself TO that extent at any rate.
PMr Barrette was in favor at tabllns
Ie resolution. lie stated that there were
,rec new members OF the board who haa
ot heard any OF the testimony ana
ley should not he expected To vote Oo
e proposition. He urged that inc en-
re matter be dropped and let the ueau
'st bury its dead. ,,-,,
Mr. C;iauque declared that Erldwcll
as strictly honestsin all ms dcdiipss
III llIe board, ank that inaSnluch rs
lily Of dishonestyeand has stolen the
nds of the board. and that his reSlS-
tion was a forced one, he thought that
, board should eNonerate him entirely. |
Nlr. Bailey declared that he certainly |
ild moi favor such Il clean bill of health !
the resolution gave Brfdwcll. He Said |
!, BridwclIS conduct of his office was |
from satisfactory and the board
'uid not give him such sweeping
Ir Thomas was of the opinion that
resolution vas an unwiSc onc.s lie |
Jared that the board had been made |
subject OF rtdicule through the mis-
naGement by Briuwell OF bis office
conduct, he insisted was far from
OF criticism, and for the board 10
him such an Endorsement as IL
'ee he thought was absurd. He said
the board could not cXonerate a
ant whose own testimony showed
! gross neglect of the duties OF his
e. The mans own uttcranccs hc
inucd, .'ou the floor of this board
ug the investigation were malicious
llsc, and. uptn they are retracted. !.
u honor and deCency: could not vote n
Snch a compi"t" whltcwaSh as this. - !
Newman Peevishly Bitter, /
:. Newman was the particular cham I
OF Bridwell. Tr will be remembered h
IN me iRvSsigation IT was shown ;
several OF Mr.. Newman's relatives 6
; placed on the payrolls OF the board
luca,ion by Eridwell under assumed
IS. and they drew money from the
,cs Mr.. BridwelI drew down this .
y himself. Then he tried TO slave ~
he Investigation.
Newman declared that there was
a bit Of evidence against Bird \
that showed that he was dishonos,
then took occasion 10 cast a few
ID remarks toward AIr. Thomas
ing At MI Thomas. he said:
his membcr of the board does th.,
Of Sherlock Holmes and hc is as
,rald reporter, who goes with him
building 10 building gathering evil
against Mr.. Bridwcli and pats
on the back during this investiga-
l have committed errors i'm my life.
believe that one OF the errors
when | voted for this man as GO
'er OF the board OF education. =
his is simply persecution. During