The Colfax chronicle. [volume] (Colfax, Grant Parish, La.) 1877-1981, 1910-07-30

ing proceeding and while It Is dignifed 1t strikes
some people also as being awfuiy iunny. =.
Every Monday, as soon as court assemblies. II
is the custom to read decisions on cases whicn
have been considered and on which the court
is to pass Judgment II the decision or a great
case is expected the courtroom always Is crowded
and the members Of the bar, newspaper men and
others who have been present before on IKE
occasions look anxiously to see which judge Is
to read the important decision. If any one OF
three four~justices is to read 1t there is dis
tinct sense of disappointment, because nobody
except the reading Judge Is likely to hear the
decision. In other words, some of the judges OF
the supreme court have such weak voices that
not even the men eiosest to them can catch what
they say and everybody must wait until the deci
sion can be read before knowing what 1t means
This inability perhaps lack of desire on the
part of some of the justices to read out loud, is
great trial to the newspaper correspondents who
are anxious to telegraph the news of the decision
at the earliest moment possible. There are other
troubles which beset the correspondents as well
those which come from the poor enuncation
and the weak voices of of the justices.
Legal language is the hardest kind of language
for the layman to understand. and the result is
that when the decision is read the first part of
occasionally makes 1t seem certain that one side
has won the case. while the tail end of the deci-
sion may reverse everything and give the case
to the other side
There was one striking instance of this in a
great case which was decided three years ago.
The city of Chicago was trying to effect changes
In its street-car system. The streetcar compa-
mics held that their franchise was good for 100
years and that the city could not GUST them from
any Of their privileges under their franchise The
case went to the Supreme court and was of tre-
mendous interest to all the cities In the United
States. Moreover, the speculative interests of
the country were awaiting the decision with the
keenest anxiety and interest for If it went one
way 1t meant that certain stocks still would be
of great value, and II it went the other way II
means that they would be worth little
The decision was read in the Supreme court
by Judge who had a good voice. Everybody
had made up his mind that If the Supreme court
decided that the railroad companies had hun
dred years franchise they had won the case and
that the city had lost. This was regarded as the
crucial feature of the W hole controversy.
The newspaper correspondents from the great
cities were in attendance at the court when the
decision read and they were ready to
dispatch messengers instantly to the telegraph
office with brief dispatch saying either The
companies win," THE city wins" This was
all that was to be sent out at the first instance
for the situation was understood in every news
paper office in the country, and single tip as to
which side won would be sufficient to release
long stories of the railroad controversy and other
stories already written of what the victory meant