The Democratic banner. (Mt. Vernon, Ohio) 1898-192?, 1910-08-26
PLETHORA
OF Suits For Divorce In Com.
mon Pleas
Two Dropped Into The Hop
per Thursday
Making Average Of One A Day
For Week
Action For Alimony Adds To
The InfeIiCity
Other Items Of Interest From
The Court House

Two suits for divorce and one for
allmony were filed Thursday morning
in common pleas court, making six or
seven of this class of lawsuits brought
here within a week. The marriage
license record is having its trials just
now keeping even with the divorce
court record.
One of the new actions was brought
by Stella NJ. Hinken against Robert
o. Hinken. They were married Jan.
20, 1898 Plaintiff says that she is
the owner of 81 acres of land in Nor
ris township and 81 acres in Monroe,
which she inherited, and that she is
the owner of large amount of per-
sonal property. The defendant, she
says, has no interest in the realty
and but small interest in the per-
sonal property, having done but little
work in accommodating the latter. She
charges that the defendant has been
guilty of habitual drunkenness for
three years last past, and alleges that
on June IL he tried to poison her by
placing poison in her tea. She
claims that he has attempted this
more than once, and that he threaten
ed to kill her and carries loaded re-
volver. She alleges that, through fear
of him, she has been compelled to
sleep in the barn. Mr.. Hinken charg-
es her husband with gambling, gaming
and betting, and says that he cores
ponds and rides with women other
than his wife, using her money. She
AYERS that he theatens to sell her per-
sonal property. Probate Judge Berry
has granted a temporary restraining
order, pending hearing of the petition
for divorce and equitable relief. VIM.
NJ Koons & Sons for the plaintiff.
Honeymoon Was Brief
Jennie Brasseur is plaintiff and Ed
ward Brasseur is defendant in the Sec
ond action. They were married ON
June 10, 1910, in this city. The wife
alleges that very soon after their
wedding her husband became indiffer-
ent towards her and commenced to
neglect her. She says that he refused
to provide home for her or to pro-
vide necessaries of life. She claims
that he took her to the home of his
parents, and she alleges that she was
greatly mistreated there. Mrs. Bras
seur declares that about the middle of
July she was compelled to leave and
to return to her parents home. Plain
tiff says that she owns cooking
stove and about ten yards of limo
leum and that these are in the pos
session of the defendant and his par
ents. She wants to be divorced, re-
stored to her maiden name, that of
Beifnos, granted alimony, ETC., Pro-
bate Judge Berry has granted a tenn
porary restraining order, giving plain
tiff possession of personal property.
The defendant is glass gatherer and
earns $25 per week. L. G. Stillwell
represents MTS. brdSSeuT.
Wants Alimony
Augusta Lambiotte VS.. Joseph Lam
biotte ct AL is the style of the third
suit. They were married April %,
1908, and have one child, Jules, now
ten months old. Mrs. Lambiotte al
leges that when their child was only
three weeks old the husband and faith
er struck plaintiff and permitted and
encouraged his mother to take the
child away from plaintiff causing her
to become ill. She alleges that she
was driven away from home on Aug
ust 23, 1910. Defendant is a glass
gatherer and earns $40 per week at
that occupation. Just now, she says
he is working in the c. & G. Cooper
plant at $40 per week She says that
the defendant has $3.50 in the Knox
County Savings Bank. A temporary
order has been granted by Probate
Judge Berry restraining defendant
from drawing this money Koons &
Sons for the plaintiff.
Haea AnneaIed