The Lake County times. [volume] (Hammond, Ind.) 1906-1933, 1910-02-11

tan name 10 unknown, as to SAID lot
be foreciosed and cut OF: that the
plaintiff Is entitled to a reasonable at
torney's fee for the foreclosure of said
lien and that . reasonable sum there
fore is ave dollars
The court further finds that there Is
now due the pIaintiff from lot two CD.
block twenty nine (ss) Oak Park adj
dition to ToIleston. the sum of one and
65-1oo ($1.s5) dollars; that the plain
tiff is entitled to the foreclosure Of
said lien against said lot and that the
equity of redemption of the defendants,
Herman Fry and Fry, his wife. Geo.
Fry and - Fry. his wife. whose true
christian name Is unknown; Esther E.
Porter and - Porter. her husband,
whose true christian name 10 unknown;
and Charles G. Teare and - Teare.
his wife, whose true christian name is
unknown. as to said lot be foreclosed
and cut on: that the plaintiff IL entitled
to a reasonable attorneys fee for the
foreclosure of said lien and that rea-
sonable sum therefore Is I'VE dollars.
The court further finds that there is
now due the plaintiff from lot one a..
block thirty (3o), Oak Park addition to
Tolleston. the sum OF one and 65-100
($1.65) dollars; that the plaintiff is en-
titled to the foreclosure of said lien
against said lot and that the equity
OF redemption OF the defendants. Mary
Collins and - Collins, her husband,
whose true christian name 10 unknown,
as to said lot be foreclosed and cut on
that the plaintiff Is entitled to q reas-
enable attorneys fee for the foreclosure
Of said lien and that reasonable sum
therefore Is I'VE dollars
The court further finds that there Is
now due the plaintiff from lot two CD,
block thirty 600, Oak Park addition to
Tolleston, the sum of one and 65-100
(s165) dollars. that the plaintiff IL en-
titled to the foreclosure OF said lien
against said lot and that the equity OF re-
demption OF the defendants, Mary Col
Tins and Collins, her husband.
whose trus christian name II unknown.
as to said lot be foreclosed and cut on {;
that the plaintiff is entitled to q reason
able attorneys fee for the foreclosure
of said lien and that reasonable sum
| therefore Is Ave dollars.
| The court further finds that there Is
now due the plaintiff from lot FIVE 60.
block thirty {30), Oak Park addition
| to Tol1eston. the sum of one and $1,000
| ($1.65) dollars; that the plaintiff Is en-
titled to the foreclosure of said lien
against said lot and that the equity of
| Te0emptlOA VI tIc dclCAodheS, Ao1
| Hurt ana Hurt, her husband.
whose true christian name Is unknown,
as to said lot be foreclosed and cut on;
| that the plaintiff Is entitled to rea-
sonable attorneys fee for the foreclos-
| ure of said lien and that reasonable
| sum therefore is Ave dollars.
The court further fnds that there Is
now due the plaintiff from lot six 60
block thirty (30), Oak Park addition te
! ToIleston, the sum of enc and 6b-10s
!, ($L65) dollars: that the plaintiff is en-
titled to the foreclosure of said lier
against said lot and that the equity o
redemption OF the defendants. Ida
1 Hurt and Hurt, her husband
whose true christian name is unknown
| as TO said lot be foreclosed and cut on
1 that the plaintin is entitled to rea
sonabie attorneys fee for the foreclos
4 ure OF said lien and that q reasonable
sum therefore Is five dollars.
The court further finds that there !:
! now due the plaintiff from lot nine
teen (19), block one (1), Oak Park ad
dition to Tol1eston. the sum of one ant
es-1oo ($1.e5) dollars; that the plaintiff
is entitled to the foreclosure or SAT-
/ lien against said lot and that the equit.
II of redemption Of the defendants, Mel
Popovic and - Popovfc. his wife
/ whose true christian name Is unknown
as to said lot be foreclosed and cut off
that the plaintff is entitled to rea
sonab1e attorneys fee for the fore
closure OF said lien and that reason
able sum therefore is five dollars
The court further finds that there !
now due the plaintiff from lot twent,
COO, block one Cd, Oak Park addition
to Tolleston, the sum of one and 65-fo
40 ho III iy1tfH 10 an
titled to the foreclosure of. said liel
against said lot and that the equity o
redemption Of the defendants, Abraham
r. Fffer and Filter, his wife. who's
true christian name is unknown; Pete
} Jurio and - Juric. his wife. who's
} true christian name IL unknown. as u
! said lot be foreclosed and cut of; tina
} the plaintiff is entitled to q REASONABLY
attorneys fee for the foreclosure o
! said lien and that q reasonable sun
therefore is five dollars.
, The court further finds that there Il
! now due the plaintiff from lot three
! (3), block two (2), Oak Park addition
, to Tolleston, tho sum OF one and oe-io'
} (s165) dollars: that the plaintiff is en-
titled to the foreclosure OF said liel
against said lot and that the equity o
redemption Of the defendants, Abraham
; Cohen and - Cohen, his wife, who's
, true christian name is unknown. as Z
said lot be foreclosed and cut on; tina
the plaintiff Is entitled to reasonable
: attorneys fee for the foreclosure o
! said lien and that reasonable sun
therefore is Ave dollars.
} The court further finds that there Il
; now due the plaintiff from lot forty
( seven (47), block sixteen O6), Oar
: Park addition to Tolleston. the sum o
, one and e5-10o ($1.65) dollars; that TIL
; plaintiff Is entitled to the foreclosure
Of said lien and that the equity OF re
demption of the defendants. Abraham
i, Cohen and - Cohen, his wife, whose
true christian name is unknown, as u
said lot be foreclosed and cut on; tina
the plaintiff is entitled to reasonable
: attorneys fee for the foreclosure o
/ said lien and that reasonable sun