davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1910-09-16

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington for the County
of King. In probate.
In the Matter of the Estate Of Mag
gle Loerke, DeceaSed.-No. 10481. Or
der to Show Cause on Sale of Real
Estate.
Milo A. Root, the administrator of the
estate of Maggie Loerke. deceased, hay
ing filed petition in this Court. duly
verified, praying for an order of this
Court for the sale of all the real estate
of which the said deceased died seized,
for the purposes therein set forth;
And it appearing to the Court from
said petition that the personal estate Of
the said deceased in the hands of said
the claims against the said estate and
the expenses of the administration
thereof, and that it is necessary to sell
all or a portion of the real estate Of
and expenses of the administration. And
it appearing to the Court that said petit
ton conforms to, and is in accordance
with the requirements of law in such
case made and provided. 1t is ordered
by the Court that all persons interested
in the estate of the said deceased ap-
pear before said Superior Court on the
goth day of September, 1910, at the hour
of $50 o'clock in the forenoon Of said
day at the court room of the Probate
Department offs aid Superior Court, in
the city of Seattle, in said King County,
then and there to show cause, If any
they have, why an order of this Court
should not be granted to said admins
traitor authorizing and empowering him
to sell the said real estate of said de-
ceased or so much thereof as may be
necessary to pay the aforesaid claims
and expenses of administration.
1t is further ordered that copy OF
this order to show cause be published at
least four successive weeks before the
said goth day of September, 1910, in the
Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed
and published in said County OF King,
and of general circulation therein.
Done in open Court this 18th day OF
August 1910.
BOYD ]. TALLMAN,
Judge.
State of Washington, County of King, SIS.
1, d. K. Sickels, County CleBk of King
County and ex-officio Clerk of the Supe-
rior Court of the State of washington,
for the County of King, do hereby certi-
fly that the foregoing is a full, true and
correct copy of an original order to show
cause, made by said Court on the 18th
day of August, 1910, in the matter OF
the estate of Maggie Loerke, deceased.
D. K. SICKELS,
Witness my hand and the seal Of said
Court this 18th day of August, 1910;
(SeaD D. K. SICKELS, Clerk.
BY PERCY F. THOMAS,
Deputy Clerk.
MILO A. ROOT,
Administrator
631-2 N Y. Block, Seattle, Wash.
Aug 19-Sept. 16, 1910.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1910-09-16

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King County
Aurora Land Company, a Corporation;
Plaintiff, vs. Unknown owners, and
all persons unknown, II any, having
or claiming an interest in and to the
hereinafter described real property.
state of Washington: To the above de-
PENDANTS and each of them:
You and each of you, as owners, claim
ants or holders of an interest or estate
in and to the hereinafter described real
property, are hereby notified that the
above-named, plaintiff is the holder OF
sued by the Treasurer of King County,
State of Washington, dated the 1st day
of June, 1909 and numbered as follows,
ing year. in the following amount, and
upon the real property situated in said
King County, described as follows, to-
Davis Improved Addition. to the City
No. B55364, year 1906 amount .$O.92.
That the taxes for the following prior
and subsequent years have been PAID, by
the plaintiff upon said above described
real property, to-wit:
Lot rs, Block l, Davis Improve6 Ad-
dition to the City of Seattle $1.4S' Tor
Which several sums bear interest at the
rate of Is per cent per annum from
said date of payment, and are all the
against said real property.
You and each of you dnclud1ng said
persons unknown, If any), are hereby
further notified and summoned to be and
appear within sixty days after the date
of first publication of this notice, ex-
elusive of the day of sa1d first publica-
ton, to-wit, within sixty days after
August IL, 1910, in the above entitled
court and action; and defend this action
and answer the complaint of said plain
tiff and serve a copy of your answer on
the undersigned attorney for plaintiff
at this office below stated. or pay the
amount due, together with interest and
costs. In case YOU fail so to do, judy
ment will be rendered herein, foreclos-
ing the lien of said taxes and costs
against each parcel of said real prop
erty for the sums and amounts due upon
and charged against each, for said taxes.
interest and costs. ordering sale or
each parcel of said property for the
satisfaction of the sums charged and
found against it respectively as provid-
ed by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's
complaint, now on file in this cause and
AUfRoRA LAND CO., Corporation,
Plaintiff.
F. ]. CARVER,
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg.
Aug. 12-Sept. 23, 1910.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1910-09-16
THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN

Commissioner, at the King County Court
House, in Seattle, King County, WASH
ington, to show cause why said order
should not be made. copy of this or
der shall be published for at least four
ca successive weeks prior to said date.
in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper
printed and published in Seattle, King
County, Washington.
The real property involved herein, In
which said minor has an undivided one
eighth interest is described as follows:
Lots nine (9), ten (10), eleven CD
and twelve G2). of block two a., Of
Blooms Subdivision of Ayres Addition
to Olympia, Washington.
The east one-half (Ek) of lots one
"a and two o., of block three go, OF
Henderson & Lyberger's Subdivision of
block fourteen d. of-Ayres' Addition
to Olympia, Washington.-
east quarter (NEA of NEA), section
twenty-six (26), township eighteen 18)
north, of range one CD west OF the Will
lamette Meridian.
R. Bigelow's Donation Claim No. 80. in
township eighteen (18l north, of range
two (2) west of the Willamette Mertdi-
an, more particularly described as fol-
Commencing one hundred and eighty
(180) feet west and one hundred nifty
four and f1ve-tenths Q54.5l feet north
of the northeast corner Of land sold to
Weisdeppe by deed recorded in Volume
20 of Deeds, page 81, records of Thurs
ton County, Washington; thence north
sixty (60) feet; thence east three hum
dred eighty-three and three-fourths
(3S3%) feet; thence south one hundred
twenty-four and fve-tenths (124.5) feet;
thence west one hundred seventy-three
north four and five tenths (4.5) feet;
thence west sixty (60) feet; thence
north sixty (60) feet; thence west one
hundred fifty (150) feet to point of COM
mencement
Done in open court, this I'd day Of
August, 1910.
WILSON R. GAY,
Judge.
Aug 12-Sent O. 1910
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1910-09-16

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King Coun-
Wyman, Partridge & Co., corporation,
plaintiff, VS.. James Fitzgerald and
Julia Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitz-
gerald & Fitzgerald, defendants.-No.
74735.
Summons for Publication.
The State of Washington to the said
James Fitzgerald and Julia Fitzger-
aid, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitz-
gerald, defendants:
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication of this summons, to-
wit: within sixty days after the End
day of September, 1910, and defend the
titled court, and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff, and serve a copy OF
your answer upon the undersigned at
torneys for plaintiff at their office be-
so to do, judgment will be rendered
against you according to the demand of
the complaint, which has been filed with
the clerk of said court. The object of
the above entitled action is to recover
upon a claim by plaintiff for goods,
wares and merchandise sold and de-
1ivered to said defendants by said plin-
tiff in the sum of Two Thousand One
Hundred Twenty-seyen and 1o-100 Dol
from the End day of May, 1910, besides
the costs of suit, and in which said ac-
ton an attachment has been taken out
and levied.
LEOPOLD M. STERN. and
]. M. RUSSELL,
Attorneys for plaintiff.
Office and postoffice address, 705 Low
man Building, Seattle, King County,
Sept. 2, oct. Is, 1910.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1910-09-16
FRIDAY September 16, 1910

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for the County
OF King.
Thomas d. Cain, Plaintiff, VS.. Mary A
Good Cain, Defendant-No. 75405.
Summons by Publication.
The State of Washington, to the said
Mary A. Good Cain, defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date Of the
first publication of this sumomns, to-
wit, within sixty days after the 10th
day of August, A. D. 1910, and defend
the aobve entitled action in the above en-
titled Court, and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your
answer upon the undersigned attorney
for plaintiff at his office below stated;
and in case of your failure so to do,
judgment will be rendered against you
according to the demand of the COM
plant, which has been filed with the
Clerk of said Court. The object of the
said action and the relief sought to be
obtained therein is fully set forth in
said complaint, and is briefly stated as
follows: To obtain a judgment of said
court granting a divorce to plaintiff
from you and to dissolve and sever the
marriage relations now existing between
plaintiff and you upon the ground Of
your abandonment of plaintiff for ten
years last past.
J. P. BALL,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
Post Office and Office address: 201-20S
Burke Bldg, Seattle, County Of King,
State of Washington.
Aug. 19-Sept. 80, 1910.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1910-09-16

ton, to-wit, within sixty days after
August ~, 1910, in the above entitled
court and action; and defend this action
and answer the complaint of said plain
tiff, and serve copy of your answer on
the undersigned attorney for plaintiff
at his office below stated, or pay the
amount due, together with interest and
costs. In case you fail so to do, judg-
ment will be rendered herein, foreclosing
the lien of said taxes and costs against
each parcel of said real property for the
sums and amounts due upon and charged
against each, for said taxes, interest and
costs, ordering sale of each parcel of
said property for the satisfaction of the
sums charged and found against it re-
spectively as provided by law, and as
prayed in plaintiffs complaint, now on
file in this cause and Court.
AURORA LAND CO., a Corporation,
Plaintiff.
F. ]. CARVER,
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg.
Aug. 12-Sept. %, 1910.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1910-09-16
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE

State of Washington, for King County.
In the Matter Of the Estate of Florence
H. Lutz, Deceased. No. 1881. No
tice to Creditors.
By order of said court made herein
on the 9th day of August. 1910, notice
is hereby given to the creditors of, and
to all persons having claims against
said deceased or against said estate or
against the community estate of said
deceased and husband to present them
with the necessary vouchers to the UNI
dersigned executor of said estate at
1911 American Bank Building, the place
of business Of said estate, in Seattle,
in said county and state within one year
from and after the date of first pub
LEGATION of this notice or same will be
barred.
HARRY E. LUTZ,
Executor of said Estate
H. e. LUTZ
Attorney for Estate.
1911 American Bank Bldg, Seattle, Wn.
August 26-Sept. 20, 1910.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1910-09-16

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, in the County of
King.-In Probate.
In the Matter of the Estate Of Elizabeth
George, Deceased.-No. 1928. Order
Fixing Time to Hear Final Account
and to Show Cause Why Distribution
Should Not be Made.
Frank Wood, administrator of the
estate of Elizabeth George deceased,
having filed in this court his final ac-
count and petition setting forth that said
estate is now in condition to be closed
and is ready for distribution of the resi-
due thereof among the persons entitled
by law thereto, and 1t appearing to the
court that said petition sets forth facts
sufficient to authorize distribution OF
the residue of said estate:
1t is therefore ordered by the court
that all persons interested in the estate
of the said Elizabeth George, deceased,
be and appear before the said Superior
Court of King County, State of Wash
ington; at the court room o or the s pa4-
tie, King County Washington, on the
10th day of September, 1910, at the hour
of $3.50 o'clock A M. of said day. then
have, why said final account should not
be allowed and an order of distribution
be made of the residue of said estate
tition mentioned, according to law.
1t is further ordered, that copy of
this order be posted in three of the most
public places in King County, for a pc
Rod of four weeks prior to said hearing
and published once week for four con-
secutive weeks before the said 10th day
of September, 1910, in the Seattle Re
publican, newspaper printed and pub
lished in said King County and of gen.
eral circulation therein.
Done in open court this 9Th day of
August, 1910.
WILSON r. GAY,
Judge
State of Washington, County Of King. S.
I, D. K. Sickles, County Clerk of King
County and eX-offico Clerk of the Supe-
rior Court of the State of Washington,
for the County of King, do hereby certi,
fy that the foregoing is a full true and nd
show cause, made by said Court on the
eth day of August, 1910, in the matter
of the estate of Elizabeth George, de-
ceased. -
Witness my hand and the seal Of said
Court this 9th day of August, 1910:
(SEAL) D. K. SICKLES,
Clerk
By PERCY f. THOMAS.
Deputy Clerk.
Aug. 12-Sept 8. 1910.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1910-09-16

State of Washington for King County.
In the Matter of the Person and Estate
of Evelyn E.. Duckering, Minor
The guardian of the person and estate
of the above minor having filed his petit
tion herein, asking for authority to sell
at private sale the undivided one-eighth
interest of the minor herein in and to
the property hereinafter described; it 10
therefore
Ordered, that all persons interested
therein appear at the hour of $3.50 A. M.
on the 9th day of September, 1910: be-
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1910-09-16

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington for King County.
Aurora Land Company, Corporatlon
Plaintiff, VS.. Unknown owners and all
Claiming an interest in and to the
hereinafter described real property;
Defendants.-No. 74S85. Notice and
Summons.
State of Washington: To the above de-
PENDANTS and each of them:
claimants or holders Of an interest or
estate in and to the hereinafter de-
scribed real property, are hereby mott
ned that the above named plaintlr is
fhe holder of one certain delinquent tax
certificate issued by the Treasurer OF
King County, State of o Wasnlngton, bare ed
as follows, for the delinquent taxes or
the foil wing year. in the following
amount, and upon the real property STU
ated in said King County, described as
follows, to-wit: c,..
of Seattle, Lot Q, Block 2, Certihcate
No. 1886, year 1906, amount 1913.
That the taxes for the following prior
and subsequent years have been pald by
the plaintiff upon said above described
real property, to-wit: 49,,
Lot g. Block g. Davis improved Aool-
ton to the City Of Seattle, SLOT, for year
Which several sums bear interest at the
rate of is per cent. per annum from SAID
date of payment, and are all the unpaid
and unredeemed taxes upon and against
said real property. <,,s, .otd
persons unknown, II any), are hereby
further notified and summoned to be ana
annear within sixty days after the date
az first publication of this notice ex-
elusive of the day of said nrst puolica-
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1910-09-16
REMOVAL NOTICE

The Light and Power depart
ment of the Seattle Electric
Company has moved to the
Electric Bldg, Seventh aven-
ue and Pine street. Street car
tickets can be purchased and all
bills paid in the Electrical Sales
Room at the old location
COZ FIRST AVENUE
THE SEATTLE ELECTRIC co
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1910-09-16

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, in and for King
County.
Arthur w. Finch, plaintiff, VS.. Francis
Finch, defendant.-No. -
-s Summons.
The State of Washington to the said
Francis Finch, defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication of this summons, to
wit, within sixty days after the End
day of September 1910 and defend the
above entitled action in the above en-
titled court and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of
your answer upon the undersigned at
torneys for plaintiff at their office be-
low stated; and in case of your failure
so to do, judgment will be rendered
against you according to the demand
of the complaint. which has been filed
with the clerk of said court
The object of this action is to secure
a decree of divorce, dissolving the
bonds of matrimony existing between
plaintiff and defendant, upon the
grounds of desertion and abandonment.
HOLZHETMER, HERALD & HOLZ-
HEIMER,
Attorneys for plaintiff.
427-2S-29 Lumber Exchange Building,
Seattle, King County, Washington.
Date of first publication, September
Sept, 2, Oct Is, 1910.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1910-09-16

Aug. 12-Sept. 9, 1910.
Idaho County free press. [volume] (Grangeville, Idaho Territory) 1886-current, 1910-11-24
An OVERSIGHT.

To impress on young children just
what should and should not be done
and why is among the most trying
problems of parents. as evidenced by
the recent experience of West Phila
delphia mother Last Sunday she
asked her small son. aged eight. to
carry chair for her from the dining
room to the parlor. He started off
willingly. but in the hall he tripped
and fell. Amid the crash could be
heard the boy giving vent to utterances
that would have done credit to pirate
of ancient days. The mother was
taken by surprise and was greatly
shocked. She gave the boy a long and
serious talk ON the subject of pro-
family. This apparently did not make
the right impression. for when she con-
cluded the boy added to her discom-
future by excaiming. II am sorry
swore. mamma. but l forgot it was
Sunday. "-Philadelphia Record.
Idaho County free press. [volume] (Grangeville, Idaho Territory) 1886-current, 1910-11-24
ALIAS SIMMONS

In the district Court Of the second ludiciHi
District OF the state OF Idaho. in ana Tor inc
County of Idaho. ~ ,.t
John s Danforth. Plaintiff VS.. The Dixie
Royal Mining Company, Ltd, a corporation'
Defendant. -,
The state Of Idaho sends greeting: 10 The
Dixie ROYAL Mining Company, Ltd, eofpor-
alton Defendant:
You are hereby notified that there has been
fled IN the office Of the Clerk 81 the Distric'
Court Of The second Judicial District OF me
state Of Idaho, in and for the county OF llaio'
the complaint OF he abave named planuH
The above en.itlg action is brought by plan
till against rhe said defendant to recotes lle
sum of s3s0S.26 on an account stated 20 ue uue
and owing from defendant to plaintiff ON the
3lst day OF Aueust, 1905 and which Is now aue,
owing and unpaid to plaintH from lelehdallt'
together with the further sum OF S562 81 az ac-
crued Interest on said s3.Oh 20 az the rare OF Z
percent per annum II I'll paid. and also to re-
cover the further sum OF Sl09l to upon an az
count for money loaned and labor performed
to the defendant by plaintih at me request M o.
defendant and interest thereon from the iolh
day Of oct. 1870 at the rate OF percent per an
mum, besides costs. all OF which said Ebove
causes of action occurred in Idaho county
Idaho.
You are hereby summoned and required to
appear and answer said complaint wlthin
twenty days after service on you OF TINS sum
mons, ii served within this judicial district, or
If served elsewhere within forty days. ,
And you are hereby notified that II Won iaiI
to appear and answer SAID compia ut as aooN
required the said plaintiff will take Judgment
against You for the sum OF five thousand four
hundred and sxty.two dollars aud seventy
nine cents with interest thereon from the 10Th
day OF October at the rate OF percent per an
nun, besides costs
Attest my hand and seal Of said District Court
this 10Th day of November 1910.
(SeaD J. /. Overman,
Clerk
L. Vineyard. residence and post office Grange
vile, Idaho, H: 9. Hazlit, Dixie, Idaho
Attorneys for Plaintiff. 200
Idaho County free press. [volume] (Grangeville, Idaho Territory) 1886-current, 1910-11-24
ALIAS SUMMONS

In the District Court of the Second Judicial
District of the state of Idaho, in and for the
County of Idaho
Leonard, and Mrs. Alfred d. Leonard and the
Dixie Royal Mining Company, Ltd, corpora
tion, Defendants.
D. Leonard and Mrs. Alfred L. Leonard. hus-
band and wife. and the Dixie Royal Mining
Company. Ltd a corporation, Defendants.
You are hereby notified that there has been
ii led in the office OF the Clerk of the District
Court OF the Second judicial District of the
State of Idaho, in aud for the County of IDAHO
the complaint of the above named plaintiff.
The above entitled actioni brought to fore
close mortgage executed by the defendant
Alfred d. Leonard to the plaintiff ON the 29th
day OF Oct 1906 on the following described
mining claims and other property described as
follows
All and singular, the Florida placer: the
st. Lucia placer claim, the Rump placer claim.
the supac placer claim, the snpae placer claim
No, the Supac placer claim No. 2, the Forks
placer claim. That certain mill site and wat
er right, situated upon the Forks placer claim,
known as the Danforth dam and mill site, the
Golden Miter quartz claim and the Big Float
quartz claim, together with all and singular the
tenements, Entertainments and appurtenances
thereto belonging or in snywise appertaining
being the same premises conveyed to the said
Alfred d. Leonard by the said plaintiff, and one
Ju es T. Reeser given to secure the payment
OF part of the purchase price of SAID premises.
to-wit; $4,000 and percent interest per annum
and the further sum OF $500 as attorneys fees,
and costs which said sums are due and owing
from said defendants to the plaintiff
That the said Dixie Royal Mining Company
is alleged to be the purchaser of said described
premises from said defendant Alfred D. Leonard
and subject to said mortgage.
You are hereby summoned and required to
appear and answer said complaint within
twenty days after service on you of this sum
mons, If served within this judicial district, or
II served elsewhere. within forty days
And you are hereby notified that if you fail
to appeac and answer said complaint as above
required the said plaintiff will apply to the
Court for the relief demanded in the complaint
Attest my hand and seal of said District
Court this 10Th day of November, 1910
(SeaD j. l. Oyerman,
Clerk
l.. Vineyard, Residence and post Office Grange
vile, Idaho II s. Hazlit, residence and post
office address. Dixie. Idaho attorneys for
plaintiffs. $50