The Washington herald., 1910-01-04
Supreme Court of the United statea


and Mr. Justice LuTton-
The Chief Justice said
1t gives me great pleasure 10 announce the ap-
pCinment Of Mr. Horace H. Luton Of Tennessee
to a scat upon this bench. AlF. Lurton Is present
ana ready to take the oath. His commission viii
be read and recorded By the clerk aud the oath
administered accordingly"
The commission was then read and the oath ad
miuisterCd b. the clerk and Air. Justice DTt0E
took his seat on the bench
Robert J. Fox. Of New York City: Leander Still
well. Of Erie. Kans.; Lewis Minor Coleman, Of
Chattanooga. Tenn: William Allen Butler. il. Of
New York City; Justin Morrill, Chambern o.
Washington. ID. G.; Samuel W. Clark Of Redfield
5. Dak.; Philip W. Frey Of Evansville. Ind Frank
Antoussnti. q San Juan, Porto Rico; George Mer
Ger j., Of New York City, and William S. Gregg
Of New York City we're admitted 70 practice
No &C. Tho City Of Minneapolis appellant vs.
The Minneapolis Street Railway Company appeal
from the Circuit Court Of the United States foE
the district 81 Minnesota; decree modified ard a.
funed with cote. Opinion BY Mr. Justice Day.
No. a. The Mechanical Appliance Company
Plaintiff IN error vs. BENJAMIN T. Castlefnan: in
error 70 the Circuit Court Of the United States foi
the Eastern district Of Missouri Judgment reversed
with costs. and cause renanded with directions %
dismiss the case for Want Of jnis1iciiOn- Opinion
by Nir. Justice Day.
No. 81. Marcslo Tiglao, plaintiff in error and
appellant TIE Insular Government Of the
A'NtANNs'
from the suTFeme Court ~ the Philippine Islands
appeal dismissed Judgment affirmed. with costs
Opinion by Alr. Justice Holmes.
No. 30, Arturo NJ. Elias appellant, vs.. Eduardo
Ramirez; appeal from the Supreme Court Of the
Territory u Arizona: decree reversed with costs
ard cause remanded with directions 10 proceed IN
accordance With the opinion Of this court Opinion
b. Mr. Justice Mckeaua.
No 20 Kanada & Co.. petitioner. vs. The
United States; On writ Of cerioTaFi 70 the United
States Circuit Court q Appeals for the Ninth
circuit decree affirmed ard cause rrmanded TO the
Circuit Court ~ tie United States for the Northern
district Of California. Opiai0n by Ar Justice
Brewer.
No. 49, Union Pacific Railroad Company. plaintiff
in cuor vs.. Morris Harris et al. IN error 70 the
supreme Court q the State II Kansas, Judgment
affirmed with costs. Opinion b. Mr. Justice Brewer.
No 60 Barton ". Kuhn vs.. FaimOut Coal
Company. GA a certificate from the United States
CirCdt Court q Appeals for the Fourth circuit
question answered in the negative. Opinion By
Mr. Justice Harlan Dissenting; Mr. Justico
Holmes. Mr. Justice White. and Mr.. Justice Mc-
kenna.
No. p A. Henley e. al. plaintiffs in error. vs..
T. Z. Myers. receiver Of the Consolidated Barb
Wire Company: IN error 10 the supreme Court q
the State Of Kansas; judgment affirmed, with costs.
Opinion by Mr. Justice Harlan.
No. 81. First National Bank Of Estheryille, Iowa,
u al Plaintiffs IL error IS City Council Of
Court Of the State = Iowa dismissed for the want
Of jurisdiction. Opinion by 3ir. Cdief Justice
Fuller.
The Chief Justice also announced the following
orders ~ the court.
No. 49, Original F. parte: II the matter Of
the United States Consolidated Seeded RaiSn Com
Iahy Petitioner. motioa for leave 20 file petition
for 4 wit n maHdamls Or CgItimaH denied.
No. = Original The State q North Carolina
Us. Tie State q Tennessee complainant 5 ruled
80 take and Gle dsrositiuns is behalf within
ninety days and defendant j. ruled % take IT'S
dep0s!t0ns 1n It's behalf within ninety days q the
conclusion Of the taking O. dispositions for coso-
gIsinaEt.
No. esZ solomon Bantley. plaintiff in error. Is
Inc State q Georgia; motion fer leave to proceed
herein IN fCrma U1uDerls granted
No. 6e3 ". s. Harlan ct al. appellants IS. 7.
F. McG0urin. United States maEhal, &c. and
No 6ai. Robert Gallagher. appellant vs.. T. F.
AlcG5unE. United States marshal. &c. motion 70
advance granted and cases assigned for argument
on TIE first Tuesday = the next tenn lOctober i.
$780, % be heard as one case.
No 13 Lssis +. Wngert. appellant. - First
National Bank 4 Hase-'0Tn e a.. motion U ad
vance denied
No E5 Abraham Ac2Td Ct al, petitioners, Is
Western P0cshontas Corporation, petition for q
wit q certi0raU the United States Circuit COur
q Appeals for the Fourth circuit d-uieG.
No ly3 {. l. Van SIC, pe-u1neL vs.. The
Tex Mining Company, petition f1r a VIII q CT
ti0rH 20 the United States Circuit Court q Ap-
p4als for the Eighth circlit denied.
Nc. zoe. Charles F. Davis petitioner. vs. The
United States petition for wit o. csrti0rari 70
the United States Circuit Court a Appeals for the
Fifth ciIcsIir denied
No. III Peals. Peacock & Kerr. q New York,
petitioners, IS. John Il Graham, petition for a
Wit u CTuCTln ~ the United states Circuit
Court q Appeals for the FIRST circuit denied
No. s2& A. h. Huston, Judge. &c, et a.. plain
rn b. 81 H.a.r- ~
y Haskell governor, IN error % the supreme Cart
% the state q Oklahoma Per cuTlam: DISMISSED
for the want Of Jurisdiction
No co.. Perth Amb0y Dry Dock Company. aD-
p-llant rs. Monmouth Steamboat Company ap-
peal From the District Cont Cf the United states
Tor the district Of New jersey. Per Criam; De
cree affirmed with costs
No g. Original Tns United states q Amer5oa,
complainant The People 4 the state q New
YORK e a.. leave granted 20 tle answer herein On
mOti7n Of Mr.. solicitor General Bowers, n behalf
Il counsel fox the defendants.
No ESP. Tie United states. plaintiff in error
vs. American Bonding CCmpauy q Baltimore; in
sFruF 20 the United States Circuit Court q Appeals
for the Ninth circut Dismissed on motion &
SiT. Solicitor General Bowers. for the Plaintiff In
erruT.
Nc 80 The United States plaintiff in error. IS
Circuit Court 4 Appeals for the Ninth circuit Dis
missed, ca motion Of Mr.. Solicitor General Bowers
FOR The plaintiff az error.
Ne. -. Standard oil Company ct al. appel
lants, vs. The United States motion 10 advance
submitted by MT. Solicitor General Bowers, foz tie
appellee.
No. ESQ. John c. Mcclellan ct al. petitioners. ~
John ( Garland United States district Judge. sc !;
motion 70 advance submitted by Mr.. Melvin GTigsbg.
.ur tie petitioner.
No. III. The Steamship Folmina. &c. peti-
homer. rs. Gustave 4. jain c. al petition flr
writ q certcTa 20 the United States Circuit Court
4 Appeals for the Second circuit submitted bT Nh
lllu SraldIrg FianIey, IN behalf If Air J. Parker
airln and Ar. John u. Wo0lssy. for the petit0ner.
nd by Mr. Frederick NJ. Brown. foT the respond
,nts.
No. 2ls The United States. appellant. vs.. The
american Tobacco Company. and
Ne. 81. The American Tobacco Company e al
appellants, vs. The United States; motion for leave
% file brief herein submitted By Mr. ". Buurza
-ochraH, III that behalf; motion for leave 10 ile
hat behalf
No g. Rumford Chemical Works. petitioner. rs
dygienic Chemical Company: and
No. III Hygienic Chemical Company. of New
elk, 90 al. petitioners. rs The Rumf0rd Chemical
'toTks; molten for leave 20 reopen proofs In the
-Tcutt Courts submitted by Mr. Reeve Lewis, II
lenat Of Mr.. Philip Mauro and Mr.. g. A. l.
Aassie, in support Of the motion, and by Mr.
Willard Parker Butler and Mr. Edwin T. Rice
II opposition thereto
No VI Pere Alfredo Luis Bagin ct al, sr-
]elants. vs.. Cusenier Company: petition for an ad-
iiuona writ Of certioraIi herein submitted By Ar
Reeve Lewis in behalf OF Nj Philip Mauro and
Mr. C. A L Massie for the appellants ana petit
louers, and By Mr.. A. L. Pnoofs and Mr.. Roger
Foster for the appellants and respondents
No -. LIYeTD1ol and London and Globe Insur
nee Company Of New YORK, plaintiff in error. vs.
The Beard Of Assessors Of the Parish Of Orleans
Z al; motion 20 advance submitted by Mr.. fred
rick = Tyler IN behalf OF counsel
No. i23 Orient Insurance Company ct al plain
his in euor. The Board Of Assessors for the
Parish Of Orleans Ct al motion 20 advance to be
leard with No, % as one case submitted by Mr.
Frederick S T9ler IL behalf Of counsel.
No 10 Frederick Weyerhaeuser ct al apueI-
ants. vs. Herbert b. Hoyt; motion to advance
o be heard with NJ. E6 submitted By Mr.. Evans
Browne in behalf Of counsel
No. so. The Atchison. Topeka and Santa Fe
Railway Company. plaintiff IN error vs. Mitchell
p Pickens; in error to the Court Of Civil Appeals
or the Fourth supreme judicial district OF the
state OF Texas; dismissed with costs on motion Of
Ar. Evans Browne in behalf Of counsel for the
plaintiff in error.
No. zoe. Northern Pacific Railway Company
plaintiff in error passie pah~ock