New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1910-06-01
BALLINCER FLAYED.
Attorneys BTandeis and Pepper
Sum Up for Prosecution
NOT A FRIEND OF THE PEOPLE.
Secretary Accused Of Being Too
Close TO Interests.

W eAoA1h5CSA1 AdJ AC--1A
up the case of the so called "prosecu-
ton" before the Ballinger-Pinchot in
vestigating committee Attorney Louis
D. Brandeis, counsel for L. r. CLAWS,
declared that it had been conclusively
established that Secretary Ballinger
is not man $50 Zealously devoted to
the interests of the common people, SO
Vlgilant and resolute in resisting the
insidious aggressions Of the special in
tereses, that he may be safely depend
ed on to carry forward the broad policy
of conservation of our national re-
sources
THAT he is subject to far seyerer
criticism we firmly believe" added
Mr.. Brandeis.
Mr.. Brandeis spoke about two hours.
He referred to Mr. CLAWS as "the ideal
public servant" and to Clifford Pinchot
as "a man of character so high as 70
be even above the suspicion of self
| seeking
He vigorously defended the action of
Stenographer Frederick M. Kerby in
making public confidential information
of the interior department bearing on
the preparation of the Lawler memoir
| andum and said Ito criticise Kerby
for this act involves total miscon-
ception of the nature of our govern
ment."
What the Evidence Shows.
Attorney Brandeis, in giving a
resume of the testimony, contended
that it had been shown:
That the secretary is not so jealous
ly devoted to the public interest that
he may be safely entrusted with the
carrying out of broad conservation
policy.
That it has been shown that many
of the Alaskan claimants were his
friends and that the secretary had at
different times acted for them.
That the secretary did everything
he could to secure the clear-listing of
the Cunningham claims before they
had been properly Investigated.
That his testimony on the stand was
evasive and contained many misstate-
ments.
That his associations showed that
he was far from hostile to the advanc-
ing of the Guggenheim-M Morgan inter-
ests in Alaska.
That it had been shown that the
"exoneration of the secretary had
been entrusted to a man admittedly
unfriendly to Glavis.''
That CLAWS was condemned by the
president on charges of which he had
no knowledge and concerning which
the chief executive had been misled
by Secretary Ballinger and his subor-
dinates.
Pinchot's Attorney Pleads.
At the conclusion of Attorney Bran
deis' argument George W. Pepper,
counsel for Clifford Pinchot, addressed
the committee. Referring to the tes-
timony which had been adduced be-
fore the committee Mr.. Pepper said it
had conclusively established three
points:
First-That the course pursued in
the interior department had been char
acterized by a lack of fidelity to the
public interest
Second-That Mr.. Ballinger was not
merely but actually responsible for
the entire series of unhappy events.
Third-That the president never
would have found himself irrevocably
committed to an endorsement of the
secretary had he not been at critical
points successfully deceived as to the
real significance of what was happen
ing in the department..
Mr.. Pepper said these points were
In harmony with Mr.. Pinchot's open
ing statement that Mr.. Ballinger had
proved unfaithful to the public,
whose properly. he had endangered,
and to the president, whom he had
deceived"