The Bridgeport evening farmer., 1910-12-01
MRS. GLOVER COOL
 UNDER GROSS FIRE
 IN COURT TODAY
(Contiued from Page 1.)

CCOntlued rom Page l.)
 in joke. It developed that the pie ture was one of man whom neith- CT of them knew. The State wn probably use this to show that her testimony is unreliable.
 Asked regarding certain letters in her possession, the defense claimed be- longed to Hattie, she declared she does not know where they are, that the police who searched the house took some of them but those that the defendants counsel wants have dis appeared somewhere. She claimed she did not know where although none had access to the box in which they were kept.
 Following a brief recess, Mrs. Glow CT. further queried regarding the mis- sing letters, said that she now be- lteved they had been taken by some one at the trial of the Glover will case. Shown photographs of the let ters. she said she could not identify them. In an argument between coun- sell Attorney Johnson, for the defen- dant said the district attorney had them. The district attorney replied: ''The counsel for the defendant knows that I have not the letters"
 Again there was considerable talk ing between District Attorney Hig- gins and the court, and Judge Bond said that Higg ms had practiced around that courthouse long enough to know what law was and was not. More questions regarding the letters were followed by more arguments and it finally developed that they might be in the hands of Attorney Fillmore, for Mrs. Glover. at the Glover will trial At this point Attorney Johnson demanded that a MT. Liftell and MT. Tucker in the law offices of Fillmore, who were present in the courtroom, be excluded, as he intended to call hnYYa a yUf fa find w "a rQ the letters were. In answer to ques- ton by Attorney Johnson, Mrs. Glow CT denied emphatically that while at a moving picture show with a Mrs. La Rouche, she had said, loud enough for persons behind her to hear, that police two days before they found her.
 It was over this question that the wrangle between the court and Dis- trict Attorney Higgins occurred. ! She was then asked regarding her said. was in 1907. She had sold the Le Blanc family several articles of clothing, at a sale of her mothers effects. after the woman's death.
 In reply to questions by defenre alleged she first discovered the inti- macy between Hattie Le Blanc and Glover, she had never seen any un- due familiarity between her husband and Hattie, nor had she in the least distrusted her French Canadian maid Upon Hattie's return to her house in April, the relations between her hus- band and Hattie continued, so far as she knew to be without reproach, un- til the day of the murder of her hrls- band.
 She said that Hattie always had been very dear to her at all times and she had liked her better than anyone in the world. She confirmed her tes- timony given at the inquest, at the will hearing, and at the probable cause hearing, where she had said she knew no reason why Hattie should shoot Glover. as they seemed always to be so amicable.
 She said that Hattie, so far as she knew, was not fam liar with the use of a revolver and had never handled one, so far as she knew.
 In reply to questions as to how long before the death of Glover she had known of his making a will, she re- piled: "One month" This will was in her favor, and was unsuccessfully contested by Glover's two brothers
 After describing her actions on the day of the shooting, court adjourned for the noon recess.