Norwich bulletin., 1910-06-25
THREE DIvORCES GRANTED
 BY JUDGE SHUMWAY.
Other Matters Before the Short CaIen-
 dar Session of Superior Court.

l Of the sixteen matters on the short calendar list in the superior court or 1 Friday five of them were postponed i or went off the list.
 | In the case of Rathbun vs. Rathbur | an allowance of $35 to defend was or 1 dered in one month.
 l In the case of Sistare vs. Sistare the motion that Julia L. Sistare, execu- i trix of Horace R. Sistare, be made $ ! party defendant was granted. A bond Of s15 in two weeks to prose | cute was ordered in the case of Ca. l pello vs- Genge. Headings on or be- l fore July 20 were ordered in the case | of Shay vs. Eggleston and others. | A motion that judgment be opened case of Kling vs. Swatzburg, Jr., and others was denied
 TO the motion that the ease of T. E Wheeler vs. c. Wheeler be placed or the uncontested list for failure to plead an answer was ordered in two weeks A bond of s75 to prosecute was ordered in thirty days in the case Of C. Wheel CT vs. T. E. Wheeler.
 Admitted to the Bar. Herman A1ofsin, 2d, was admitted to the bar upon motion of Attorney A. M Brown, and the oath was administered by Clerk Parsons.
 Charles V. James was recommended by Attorney w. H. Shields and he was likewise admitted to the bar of this county Judge Shumway told the young men to note the features of the oath and ever stand thereby, for they are necessary for success. Both are graduates of the Yale Law
 school this year and have passed the state examination.
 Attorney Alofsin is son of E. Alofsin of the West Side, graduate of the Free Academy in 1904. Yale. 1908, and Yale Law school 191O He will practice his profession here.
 Attorney James, son of the late c. D.. James. is graduate of the local schools and he was congratulated by stated by Attorney Shields. He had been in Attorney Browning'sl office.
 Attorney Frederick P Latfmer was made commissioner of the superior court.
 Three Divorces.
 Mary E. Butler of New London was of Portsmouth, Va, on the grounds of adultery and she was allowed to re- sume to maiden name, Mary E Pitt They were married in 1901. She claim ed that her husband stayed away nights and was in the company of a woma manned Mamie Barry of Water ford W. A. Wheeler of New London testified to the husband being a dog of Mamie Barry. Others testified for the plaintiff.
 Adultery the Charge.
 On the grounds of adultery Made line Roe Kinney Of New London vxas given divorce from Benjamin l. Kinney. They were married July Is, 1904, and went to Weehawken to live. Because of his vile actions she had to leave him. She had been to Cuba with her husband, who for time was a baseball manager, and went with other women Others testified in her behalf She was allowed to resume her maiden name.
 Husband Was Incorporate.
 A divorce was given Lucy B. w. Philbrook of New London from Fred erick H. Philbrook of parts unknown on the grounds of habituaI intemper- ance. They were married May T. 1898 at New London and the last she saw of her husband was in March, 1909. and he was drunk He worked in Turkish baths and was often drunk. He was sent to Auburn prison for for gerry. He induced his mother-in-law to mortgage her home in New Lon don. He had been 8 drummer for and they lived in Massachu- setts and at Torrington. Her maiden ] name was Webb and shs was allowed to take that name She wanted her child's name changed to Webb, as she did not want it to have & convict's name. This will come up next week. | No cases were assigned and the | court was adjourned until next Friday | at 10 o'clock.