The Vinita daily chieftain. [volume] (Vinita, Indian Territory [Okla.]) 1902-1913, 1910-06-13

From every lnd1catlon Okianoma
City won the state capital in the eIec-
tion Saturday, by plurality over the
other contesting cities of about 10000
The bill for the permanent location is
believed to have carried by about
1000. The election is still claimed by
both Guthrie and Oklahoma City, but
the opponents of the removal bill have
conceded its carriage.
No official figures from the other
counties can yet be had. In tele-
phone communication to the Chieftain
this afternoon Oklahoma City claims
the capital removal bill carried by
$4,000, but the headquarters at Guth.
rie state that the present majority OF
the bill Is only 1000 with several OF
the counties to hear from. Most of the
jprecincts not yet heard from are in
the rural district and are conceded to
be opposed to the bill
The following is the official vote in
Craig county by precincts:
vinita--Capital removal bill, yes
15O; NO 255, Oklahoma City, ITO;
Shawnee z; Guthrie GA; On the amend.
ment, yes 131; NO 291.
Fields Removal bill, yes" 2; mo
A. (no votes for any of the cities),
amendment YES 2, NO AZ.
Horn-Remoyal bill, yes IL, no rs
Oklahoma City 10, Guthrie AZ, amend
ment, yes II, no So.
Welch-Removal bill, yes 46, no liz
oklahoma City 13, Shawnee 5. Guth
rie 80, amendment, yes 80, no 1873.
Grant Mound-Removal bill, yes
no 40, Guthrie 4, Oklahoma City 1;
amendment, yes 2, no so.
Morris school house-Removal bill
lyes 2, no IS, Guthrie 2; amendment
Iyes 6, no SO.
Centralia-Removal bill. yes "a, nc
l1O2, Oklahoma City 80, Shawnee /
Guthrie "a; amendment, yes 81, no II
Thornton-Removal bill, yes II, nc
I52, Oklahoma City 20, Shawnee 2
Guthrie 2S; amendment. yes 22, nc
las.
Bluejacket-Removal bill, yes "a, nc
SO, Oklahoma City 29. Shawnee 1
Guthrie 80; amendment, yes II. no Ill
| Pleasant Valley-Removal BILL yes
11S, no 81, Oklahoma City Is. Guthrie
10; amendment, yes 8, no So.
Kelso-Remoyal bill, yes Z, no so
IUklahoma City 10, Guthrie Z; amend
ment, yes s, no 81.
Coynes-Removal bill, yes 19, no 7S
Oklahoma City 8, Shawnee 2. Guthrie
3; amendment, yes II, no S5.
White Oak--Removal bill, yes II
no S5, Oklahoma City 8; amendment
yes Is, no 81.
4 Willie Halsell College Removal bill
yes Is, no AZ, Oklahoma City Is
Guthrie 10; amendment, yes IS, no 4S
Albia-Removal bill, yes 6, no 80,
Oklahoma City 5, Guthrie 7; amend
ment, yes 10, no "a
Big Cabin Removal bill, yes S3, nj
IA, Oklahoma City 81, Shawnee 8
Guthrie IL; amendment, yes Il, NJ
l156.
Timber Hill-Removal bill, yes 9, M
55, Oklahoma City 8, Shawnee l, Guth
rie 10 amendment, yes 13, no 81.
Total for the county for the remova
bill, 449; against the removal bill
1868 Favoring Oklahoma City, 439
favoring Shawnee %; favoring Guth
rie, 2S4. For the amendment, 37S
against the amendment, 1882
The vote in this county was yer,
light. only 1850 ballots being cast
This is not two third of the norma
vote of the county.
Oklahoma City, Okla. June 49,
With few exceptions all late ofiieia
election returns received by the Okla
homa City capital committee Sunda
have increased the majority for tn
bill and Oklahoma City. sidne
Brock, president of the Chamber Q
Commerce, who has been in touc
with about every source of informs