Rocky Ford enterprise., 1910-12-09
NEED OF ECONOMY POINTED OUT
Ha. Little to Say About the Tariff---Work on
Panama Canal Is Reviewed---No Change
in Anti Trust Laws---I Interstate
Commerce Laws Are Discussed.

each department chief to reduce the
estimated cost of his department for
the ensuing fiscal year ending June
80. 1912. say this In order that con-
gress may understand that these esti.
mates thus made present the smallest
sum which will maintain the depart
ments. bureaus and ofIices OF the gov
eminent and meet its other obliga-
tions under existing law. and that a
cut of these estimates would result
in embarrassing the executive branch
of the government In the performance
OF its duties. This remark does not
apply to the river and harbor esti-
mates. except to those for expenses of
maintenance and the meeting of obli.
cations under authorized contracts,
nor does It apply to the public build.
ing bill nor to the navy building pro-
gram. OF course. a. to these con.
gress could withhold any part or all
Of the estimates for them without In.
terfering with the discharge Of the or
dinary obligations OF these functions
Of its departments. bureaus and Of
fees.
ending June 30. 1912, as they have
been sent to the treasury on Novem.
Der 20 Of this year. for the ordinary
expenses Of the government. including
those for public buildings. rivers and
harbors. and the navy building pro-
gram. amount to 3630.4s4.0l3.12. This
is S52 1854 .S87.36 less than tho ap.
rropriations for the fiscal year end.
ing June 30. 1911. II Is $16,sS3, 1894
less than the total estimates. incIud.
ing supplemental estimates submitted
to congress by the treasury for the
year 1911. and is S5.574.659.3s less
than the original estimates submitted
by the treasury for 1911.
These fiugres do not include the
appropriations for the Panama canal.
the policy in respect to which ought
to be. and IL. to spend as much each
year as can be economically and ef.
fectively expended in order to com.
plete the canal as promptly as posi-.
BILE. and therefore. tho ordinary mo-
tive for cutting down the expense Of
the government does not apply to ap-
propriations for this purpose.
Against the estimates of expendI.
lures. Ss40.4s4.o13.12. We have estimat.
ed receipts for next year Sss0. .o00. 900.
making probable surplus OF ordinary
receipts over ordinary expenditures Of
about $4,000. 900. or taking into &C.
count the estimates for the Panama
canal. which are $56.s20,Sl7.6s, and
which will ultimately be paid in bonds,
1t will leave Q deficit for the next
year Of about 100000. II congress
shall conclude to fortify tho canal"
The TarIff.
Tho President devotes but little
space to the subject OF the tariff law,
and Of It he says:
"Ths schedules of the rates of duty
in the Payne tariff act have been sub
jected to . great deal Of criticism,
some Of II just. more Of It unfounded,
and to much Misrepresentation. The
act was adopted In pursuance Of q
declaration BY the party which 10 re-
sponsible for It that customs bill
should be q tariff for the protection
OF home industries. the measure Of
the protection to be the difference be.
tween the cost Of producing the i'm
ported article abroad and the cost of
producing It at home. together with
such addition to that difference as
might give a reasonable profit to the
home producer. Tho basis for the
criticism Of this tariff is that In re-
spect to a number Of the schedules
the declared measure was not follow
ed, but a higher difference retained or
BY way Of undue discrimina.
tion In favor Of certain industries and
Little. II any. of the
criticism Of the tariff has been direct.
ed against the protective principle
above stated: but the main body Of
the criticism has been based on the
to conform to the measure Of
protection was not honestly and sim
cerely adhered to-"
The TarIff Board.
The president refers to the appoint
ment Of a board of experts to investi-
gate the cost Of production OF various
articles included in the schedules Of
The tariff. and says:
"The tariff board thus appointed
and authorized has been diligent in
itself for the necessary in
The hope Of those who
have advocated the use OF this board
'or tarin purposes is that the question
If the rate Of duty imposed shall
become more Of q business question
ind less Of a political question. to be
'scertained by experts Of long train
ng and accurate knowledge. The
,alt In business and the shock to bust. |