United labor bulletin., 1910-01-21
LABOR COMBINATIONS
What is Right for Employers Cannot
Be Wrong for Employees===The
Seed of Legislation
BY C. IRUIN
BY C. #. IR UIN.


daily papers Denver agreement existing publishers
Rasdd % % 5 @ dn @ r % s P the R5esn the News and
stated substance that their based
% das t Ss,sse question: f The n, ns ~h de call attention. that under
csab Che a9' tho of @ Morrison w sad MITCHELL the 5
@ asns Of .ssn D m o % they would 's s and @
sound law all of the publishers of the mentioned should be confined
legal and moral rights While my sympathy with the freely
to employers every right which claim for employees
The foregoing publishers of Denver has been
made for the of criticism but for the purpose Of illustration % H. The & 1 &
hold ,ha, labor combinations
hat what lawfully do alone several E may lawfully agree S to do % Jointly
% as nfs. % @ 5 .soy % awful a T % Repnn % % The the N 2s~.s and % & @ @
the thing If lawful for all four lock out then
employer lock his could for all them do
The advantage which & accrue cru IRON oIss,Ion @ @ and the un,a = Ct a
and the accumulation Of necessary order command and
ing will order thereby to be able
greater and conditions of their employment
II the combinations of employers right then employees have an equal night
combine Unfortunately Of are presided by Judges who
Sb % o uJsrJe law i"~J England for tune but in 1875 the
British Du.nt passed statute providing an asemen, or combination of two
do or to be done act contemplation further
conspiracy anf; such an act committed BY % one person would be an % mo-
all should be enacted by the Colo
ad legislature 5 least W. As good % & the statute ,s Passed 3 by the an Bg p %
law recently laid down by Denver judge the subject of pekedns
An old pfvfb the life Of trade The policy Of
ddou Capitalists have seized upon h. idea mepre.eed
the freedom of labor place of the
ss .o%s a 1 o" the supreme & Of Il, uned states who & differently
the ob 5 Mr. y Ss Holmes used y. o%"s language
The Of allowing the mchng
temporal including damage of with mans business by
when the damage done for its sake but nsumeny
in battle of trade In
Whether the plaintiff the only Ns of the defendant and aimed
specifically of class all of whom hit The only debatbe ground
We
he s.na % % i be done dome g p1sf % % to or ais withdrawal a Of R snd
advantages which, apart from this eGn;equenee arc within the defendant lawful
third who have right deal deal with the plaintiff
inducing deal with him. either
that combine with other things
much they for their labor capital combine with
the possible be that when combined they
and the bowa refusal of those advantages which they other
lawfully control remember when people thought that
a, nelsen, and Legislators have that notion to-day
feel confident that they equally will abandon the idea that organized
employ ASSOCIATED from threat of violence and is made
for the sole object of prevailing possible contest with their employer about
the OF
foregoing quite quotation opinion
intellectual and lcnndd the bench Of the of the
Repeatedly opinion industrial
conflict between employers and the employed He Certainly the policy
limited struggle between the class competing for the
end. il applies to all conflicts of temporal interests
the labor struggle essential right
the for life The right STRIKE combine and advise and
that labor produces all wealth Why does organized labor sae
apply the law combinations of worknsmn that they apply
capitalists enough that there and them judge
laborc claimed by capitalists statutes done
England that will compel the the fundamental right
let organized labor into politics m,hscn hon
ear The oer produce all the wealth. they constitute
men All do forth hands and
seize them VIII you do h'