Norwich bulletin., 1910-02-14
SUPERIOR COURT.
Short Calendar Special Session-Much
Business Disposed OF - Judge
Wheeler Pares Counsel Fees In Per-
kins Case-Largs Number of
Divorces.


Judge Ralph Wheeler presided at
special session of the Windham coun-
ty superior court held in this city on
Saturday. There was a lengthy list of
matters on the short calendar list to
be disposed of, but the session might
have been dttingly termed divorce day.
there being an unusually large num-
Der OF uncontested cases on the list.
The matters on short calendar were
disposed of as follows:
In the case of Joseph p. Love VS..
John J. Love. default for failure TO an
swer, an answer was ordered in two
weeks.
Judge r. r. Russell asked for a fur
Their order of notice in the case of
Joseph Malboeuf VS.. Marie l.. NAL
| boeuf, the defendant having been dpal-
ly traced to Montreal The extension
| was granted.
| In the case of Charles Fl. Heath VS..
Bessie A. Heath, the court ordered that
| $50 be allowed the defendant for de-
Tense the amount payable the first
| Tuesday in March
An answer in three weeks was or
dered by Judge Wheeler in the case
of James Grammar VS.. Lily C. Kins-
| ley.
A two weeks continuance was grant
ed on the motion for a further contin-
uance in the case Of Edith F. Augur
VS.. Edmund Anger.
A special continuance was ordered
| by the court in the case of Delphis
Boucher VS.. Rodolph Racicot.
An answer in one week was ordered
in the case of Charles H. Baker VS.. the
default for failure to answer.
In the case OF Fayette l.. Wright VS..
| the New York, New Haven and Hart
ford Railroad company, default for
failure to answer. an answer was Or
dered IN two weeks.
| Foreclosure of a mortgage was
granted in the case of William p. KEEL
| ley OF Dayville VS.. Nellie +. Nichols
| eft al. The judgment was for $3.50. and
| the first Monday in March fixed by the
court as the limit for redemption
Foreclosure was also granted in the
case of Hattie r. Barber of Central
Village VS.. Francis L. Lockwood, now
| of parts unknown. Lockwood secured
| 800 on a note dated Nov. IL, 1908, and
was to use it to build a house at Cen
| trail Village. He has disappeared from
that section, leaving only the founda-
ton of the building completed. Judg-
ment was granted the plaintiff, who
was represented by Judge Harry E.
Back of Danie1son, the amount being
March named as the limit of time for
redemption.
Another case in which mortgage
was foreclosed by order of the court
was that of George W. Hall of Thomp-
son VS.. Arthur c. Parent of Webster.
Parents note to Hall bore the date of
| May II, 1897, and was for $3.50, of
which $3.50 had been paid on the prin-
farm OF about 60 or 20 acres near VIII
sonville. The farm was described ad
very poor and as being without build
ings excepting an old barn. The judy
ment granted by the court was for
S203.0T. and the time of redemption
limited to the first Monday in April.
Attorney Torrey represented Mr.. Hail.
Suit for Alienation of Affections.
Motions for special bail, for a more
specific statement, for correction OF
complaint, and that the plaintiff fur
nish bond for prosecution were argued
in the case of Charles r. Alling of
East Hartford VS.. Maurice Palmer of
Willimantic. The special bail was
Wheeler ordered the hhng of a more
specific statement and fixed the time
for doing SO at three weeks, but de-
MED the motion for e correction of the
complaint. Attorney Danahey of Will
Iimanttc represents the plaintiff in the
case and Attorney King of the same
city appears for the defendant. The
action is a claim for damages for the
Mrs. A1ling by Maurice Palmer. The
complainant claims that on various &C.
casions last summer Mrs. Alling went
automobile riding with Mr.. Palmer
without the permission of Mr.. Alling.
The complaint also alleges that in Au-
gust of last year Mrs. Alling removed
household goods from the home of the
plaintiff in East Hartford and took
them TO Stafford Springs, in which
town the plaintiff also alleges that
Mrs. Ailing and Mr.. Palmer took meals
at the same house
Lawyers Fees Scaled 800 and $500.
Final judgment was given by Judge
Wheeler in the case of John +. Car
penter trustee VS.. Mary E. Perkins ct
al in accordance with the advice of
the supreme court upon reservation.
and to each of the attorneys or firms of
attorneys interested in the case. al
1oWance for expenses and counsel fees.
There were seven law firms interested,
all of whom agreed that each ultimate
interest in the estate, which amounted
to $4,000. should pay a proportionate
share of the cost for counsel except in
the share OF Mary z. Perkins. which is
double that of the other heirs, and
that her counsel. Mr.. Beers. should
receive pay in proportion. In con-
ference the attorneys had agreed upon
a Thousand dollars each in addition to
their expense. and the matter was so
stated to the court. Judge Wheeler,
however, reduced this 500 in six in
stances and 5000 in the case of Mr..
Beers. The amounts, including ex-