The Lake County times. [volume] (Hammond, Ind.) 1906-1933, 1910-02-11
is ave dollars.

The court further finds that there is
now due the plaintiff from lot two ca.
block forty-seven (47) Second Oak
Park addition to Tolleston, the sum of
one and e5-10o ($1.e5) dollars: that the
plaintiff il entitled to the foreclosure
of said lien against said lot and that
the equity Of redemption OF the de-
PENDANTS, Henry Carroll and - Car
rell, his wife. whose true christian
name IL unknown. as to said lot be
foreclosed and cut or; that the plain
tiff is entitled to a reasonable attor-
ney's fee for the foreclosure of said
lien and that reasonable sum there
fore is f1ve dollars.
The court further finds that there is
now due the plaintin from lot three
go. block forty-seven (47). Second
Oak Park addition to Tolleston. the
sum of one and $1,000 ($1-s5) dollars;
that the plaintiff is entitled to the
foreclosure Of said lien against said
lot and that the equity of redemption
of the defendants, Mary A. Hadley and
Hadley, her husband, whose true
christian name is unknown, as to said
lot be foreclosed and cut of; that the
plaintiff Is entitled to reasonable at
torney's fee for the foreclosure Of said
lien and that a reasonable sum there
fore Is five dollars.
The court further finds that there is
now due the plaintiff from lot four
%. block forty-seven (4D, Second
Oak Park addition to Tolleston, the
sum of one and $500 ($1.s5) dollars;
that tho plaintiff is entitled to the
foreclosure of said lien against said
lot and that the equity OF redemption
Of the defendants. Josie A. Nolan and
- Nolan, her husband, whose true
christian name Is unknown, as to said
lot be foreclosed and out on: that the
plaintiff Is entitled to q reasonable
attorneys fee for the foreclosure of
said lien and that q reasonable sum
therefore is ave dollars.
The court further finds that there is
now due the plaintiff from lot three
(3), block ffty-two (52). Second Oak
Park addition to- Tolleston, the sum Of
one and 65-1oo ($1.65) dollars; that the
plaintiff is entitled to the foreclosure
of said lien against said lot and that
the equity of redepmtion of the de-
PENDANTS, John Presiehl and Augusta
Presiehl, his wife, as to said lot be
foreclosed and cut on; that the plain
tiff is entitled to a reasonable attor-
ney's fee for the foreclosure of said
lien and that a reasonable sum there
fore is ffve dollars.
The court further finds that there Is
now due the plaintiff from lot four
"a, block ffty-two C52). Second Oak
Park addition to Tolleston. the sum OF
one and $500 (s1.s5) dollars; that the
plaintiff is entitled to the foreclosure
of said lien against said lot and that
the equity of redemption of the de-
PENDANTS, John Presiehl and Augusta
PresiehI, his wife, as to said lot be
forec1osed and cut off; that the plaintiff
is entitled to a reasonable attorney
fee for the foreclosure of said lien and
that reasonable sum therefore is five
dollars.
The court further finds that there Is
now due to the plaintiff from lot three
CO, block four ca, Oak Park addition
to Tolleston, the sum of one and 65-10o
(sLs5) dollars; that the plafntin Is
entitled ito the foreclosure of said lien
against said lot, and that the equity
of redemption of the defendants. Mrs
Alfred Peil and - Perl, her husband
whose true christian name Is unknown
as to said lot be foreclosed and cut off;
that the plaintiff Is entitled to reas-
enable attorneys fee and that reason
able sum therefore is five dollars
The court further finds that there II
"a. block four ca. Oak Park addi-
| ton to Tolleston, the sum OF one and
| e5-1oo (s1.e5) dollars; that the plain
! tiff is entitled to the foreclosure Of
/ said lien against said lot and that thu
| equity Of redemption OF said defend
ants. Antino e. Drogumiellar and -
| Drogumiellar his wife, whose true
| christian name is unknown, as to sale
lot be foreclosed and cut on; that the
plaintiff Is entitled to a reasonable at
torney's fee for the foreclosure of saie
| lien and that a reasonable sum there
| fore is FIVE dollars.
The court further finds that there II
now due the plaintiff from lot Ave 60
| block four a., Oak Park addition t.
Tonest ton. the sum of one and 65-1o
| (s1.65) dollars; that the plaintiff Il
entitled to the foreclosure Of said lier
against said lot and that the equity o
redemption of the defendants, Antin'
F.. Drogumiellar and - Drogumiei
lar, his wife, whose true christian nam
is unknown. as to said lot be fore
lclosed and cut off; that the plaintiff 1
entitled to a reasonable attorneys fe
/ for the foreclosure of said lien AM
that a reasonable sum therefore is Nv
dollars.
The court further finds that there /
4 now due the plaintiff from lot six (6)
block six (e), Oak Park addition I
Tolleston, the SUM of one and 65-lo
($1.65) dollars: that the plaintin Is en-
titled to the foreclosure of said liel
against said lot and that the equity 0
| redemption of the defendants, Antin
E. Drogumiellar and - Drogumiel
} lar, his wife, whose true christian nam
is unknown, as to said lot be foreclose
and cut of; that the plaintiff is entitl
ed to a reasonable attorneys fee 70
the foreclosure of said lien and that
reasonable sum therefore is Ave dol
| lars.
The court further finds that there
now due the plaintiff from lot thir
teen (13). block four (4), Oak Park ad
dition to Tolleston, the sum Of one an
$500 ($1.65) dollars; that the plain
tin is entitled to the foreclosure of sal