The Washington herald., 1910-01-15
DAILY COURT RECORD
Friday, January ID, ioio.t

neys. Wilson & Barksdalc- McKenney & Flaunery
No EOS Copperihite vs.. Copperthite; motion 10
qnash alias silt granted Atomeys T. II. Patter-
son and O. Afackey.
No a5l0. Ashford vs. Stevens. motion 10 strike
ont second amended declaration oyeuuled. Attor-
nfys, II. +. Davis. C. C. James. and L. b. Carter
T. L. jeaords and w. H. HalloBay
No 35i. Mooney IS. sarae; same. Attoneys,
No a5l2 Webster vs. same; same. Attorneys.
same
No H79l United States tc use. American Ensm-
eied Brick and Tile Company vs.. Hene Safety
Boiler Company ct a.. time 70 file transcript Of
record EXTENDED. Attorneys RaIsion, Sidd0ns &
Richardson BrandenJuTg * BrandeHbugg.
No. 1888 Ransom vs.. Capital Traction Company
Cause restored io calendar. AttOfueyz. e. H. Syme
X H. Perry * Son and O. y Dunlop.
~" 1901 Ball. administrator. vs. United States
1 LApIesa Company. case certified to Circuit Court
No, Attorneys. Baker sheehy a Hogan-BiTney
W09dad.
No. 52sL Mark vs. District q Columbia demur-
| rer 10 answer oaerHled Attoneys Pennebaker.
Carisi & Jones-E. H. Thmras
no Jlsbl umttd States * rel Walcott vs. Sec
I feieTy = interior demurrer To return of respondent
"'tIHltd; judgment Ger costs; aFPeal noted At
I iomey'. T. ". McBeyuG,ds-F " Clements and
{. L. Wright
No 5as3. United States * Pei. Colbert IS.
2o1llefA surety Company. motion 70 reargue no
] ii1n tor Judgment oyorullsd Attornsys. glernan &
Lerch-I'ennebaker, Cansi q Jones
| NO. 3b5s CONAN et sl. Is. johnson 81 al So
curly ior costs ordered Attorneys. Brandenburg
RFaudcuburg -jChn Rid1ut
Nc. oi5'l- l'ratt-K Company W. Peoples; NO
ton 10 withdraw note II issue granted: security for
s1' o'sIHlied and 20 set day fOf trial granted At
t0fney, Z. ;. Duyall, r.
No 5zl5i. Grilibortzer rs. Harry; Judgment by de-
| fault ATTORNEY /. 7. Harlyx.
I NO 5-l5b. Long rs. Moore 4 Hill; order 20 pay
iund 70 plaintiff Attorneys. John RidCut-W. ].
Lambert.
No: 1885,. TJUCH vs. ING Wah ct al. Judgment
/ BY default. Attorneys c. A White and ]. b.
tlyrn-Isalston. Sidd0us & RichaTdson
Assignments fer JauI-ry Il:
| No. us. HaRa vs.. Distric. of Columbia Attor-
neys, Montague d Monarity-T Thomas.
| No "a Gleason Es. Washington Terminal Con-.
pany; Attorney, AcNamaT1 & Huidskoper-Hamn-
! ton & Matber.
No. 73. oliver Vs. Philadelphia. Baltimore ard
Washington Railroad ConpaHy ATTORNEYS Worth.
/ Ington. Head a Frauey-NcKerHev a Flsnnerv.
no. 20 Miller kOIp Cut Stone Company vs.
/ Diamond Stone Brick Conpsny Attorueys Lam.
| bert fe3tman-J- II Heydsn
Circuit Court No. 2.
CHIEF JUSTICE CLABAUGH.
| No. 5NH. Osg9od rs. Catlin Company: case "a
/ stored 10 calendar Attorneys Haywood & Morris
/ Tucker Kenyon.
/ No. 57S2 McCloskey vs.. Fuller Company; time {,
/ lie transcript extended. Att0UcT5 = Y HFv5eT
E >. DuTal and McKenaey x Palmer.
| No. 5lSt. Parsons vs.. DISTRICT q Columbia; de
Hirrer sustained; appeal noted. Attorneys. S. T
/ Thomas and John Rldout-E. Il Thomas
| No. 5-s53 +. g. Schafer & CO. u. w Ward
Judgment ny default. AtJOruey J. A. Hicks.
! No ~ RaUs-her Rau.che-; goods Orrfsr-
/ % be placed in storage Atio-neys. Hsrgrove ane
/ Eas1y-smith-E. Il. Thomas and ". II. Wits
/ No. 4ss'S Cray vs. Js7lns; motion for new tta
! oEeTuled and Judgment. Attorney Braudeuourg s
] br1ncenoIrE- B.rleg & WOldsrd
/ No. 5i5lZ HAYES Ambrose; eoutlnuAnc
! stricken out Attorneys. ". Hacker and S p
! NEes-Joln Ridout and .. Rothschild.
No. 5l2L LehJ0n -. BsltimJres ard Ohio Ran
/ road Company sane Attorneys. McAlahon, Nc
| Ma1on D-cssy-G. Z. Hamilton
! No. 5i'J6. Leroy ". Edwards Us. Lew Woodbury.
seearl;y tor costs ordered Attorneys. T. :. Key
| snith-BraudeH5grg & BTDdeuO1rz
No. 41b. Lyon vs.. Burseys motion 20 certify Z,
Circuit Court No. I cTerlied Attorneys Halam 1
/ Hai. an Simmons and W. II. Wlsts
/ No 57si. Brand IS. Marsh; motion 70 Vacat
/ Judgment u condemnation oTeurled
I No. i2ss5. johnson TO. Savings Bank vs Men
| del; appeal need. Attorneys, T. L. Jeford5-W II
/ White
/ No. s7n. Phillips vs.. Bramhau. Judgment Of fa
on 81. IA. IS. defendant Geis-. Attorneys Citing
I s. thauhgria.r
I No. 1878 Grant vs. Rabbit: refund Of deposi
[ ordered. Attorney l. S. Ballet. /. Jef175s
Assignments for TO-DAY.
/ No. IL Carver vs. Great Pals and Old Dominion
Railway Company Attorneys Clinks-alas & Scot
". J. Lambert
No ia Hanes vs, So1the-u Railway Company
Attorners. Gordon q Gordon. Biar s Tl1m-Ham
ltOn. Colbert. Yerkes K Hamilton
No. 2 TruLton w. Saunders e a. Attorneys
Happier & Me1Ilat-Flauuery * Hi,z.
No. 100 RIuehsTt rs. Chesapeake and Ohio Rail
,, way Company. Attorneys, PeTy-Hamltou & Col
bert
No 80 Cant rs. Babhe1t. Aroneys. Strickland
& Bailey-Je1ordS
No. rs Osgoo5 IS. The Elmer 4. Carlin Con.
Pary. Attorneys. HsTguYe q M1-Tls-Tucksg &
keayon,