Arizona republican., 1910-03-30

1 seventeenth vice president and sec rctary." tMr. ChanningO rushed to the police court to defend him. At the conclusion of his remarks Mr. Adams said he wanted to make the statement regarding the conduct ui his bar tie had put il in. charge "f q management entirely distinct from that of the Hotel Adams. lie had bong ago instructed the mana ger on II" account to sell lGu"r t" i minor or tu one whom he might su$p,-ci nr being a minor.
 IL was also the policy nf the bar n"t tu sell liquor {" any man whose friends had requested that he Joe mol served lir had three cnmmnuica ti"ns on that subject and tn" names were lsted and given (" th" mana ger with instructions not. (" let those men have liqH"r-
 He s,rnti"n"d that one of tine names on that list was "f the son of a minister in rhornN The mes sage had come over the telephone and the person who sent it refused tu give his name The minister NJS present at the hearing and Jt the close of it. Mir. Adams sald that he had to rcgrct having mentioned the name. but the mention WAS incidental tn a description of th" policy uI the Hotel Adams bar
 AIr Langston closed for the prose cution and in his remarks he de nuunced MT Adams for having allud- eel tn the Anti saloon League as hay ing been engaged in the dchauchrrN 0r h"yS Nlr Adams replied that h" had not meant the lcaguc bat tn" leading officers of it.
 Mir Langston attacked the officers for a failure to perform their duty and at one point he made remark which might be construed to reflect upon the district court He said that at the beginning of the proceed ings had last fall, the court had informed the officers of the loa@u" that ii it could furnish evidence that the law Was being violdtcd, the li- censes of the offending saloons would he revoked But has he done lt inquired the attorney
 At the conclusion of this ease and after a consultation. Chairman H"ghe deprecated the bitterness which the parties had shown to each other and said that decision would be reserved until this morning. Judge L.aneston then said that he would not proceed with the other cases SD long as there had been no decision in this one. He gathered mp his books and papers and the case of C. F. smith was called. Mr. smith had made application for license for a saloon to take the place of the one whose license had been revoked by an order of the court Judge Langston still refused to proceed. saving that il was so late that the ease could not be concluded. The supervisors urged the beginning at least as the time was short in which the cases could foe heard and beside. Alr. Hunsaker could not be present today.
 But nothing more was done. There was some discussion among the mem hers of the board which soon after went into executive session. lt k understood that one of the mat ters before it was the application e John Stroehle for a license for the Sasino saloon whose license had been revoked What action was taken will be made known today It is under stood to he the policy of the board not to refuse a license merely because a former license owned by another man or company had been revoked. hut the case of Stroohlr is s"mcT hat complicated by the fact that he was l minority shareholder i'm the former Casino company.
 It is also understood that the board went oyer the cases and decided the matter of issuing licenses To the "ui ilins saloons The board IS known |" .hal.- been opposed [" that regardless %. The character "f the applicants. s" that unless there has been I chang" pI mind those licenses will probably hc denied
 IL will also likely be found that thc boarl has disposed uf the whole saloon EcrIsc matter.