The San Francisco call., 1910-12-02

Students Coerced by Mailed Fist of
Prof. A. B. Clark, Who Gained His
Experience in Elmira RefoTmatory
DR. JORDAN NEGLECTS THE PATIENT
Seed of Antagonism Is SoWn by the Committees
Arbitrary Action, and Harvest of Hostility
And Bitter Opposition Is Now Being Gathered
BY w. RUSSELL COLE

BY w. RUSSELL COLE
@ IANFORD UNIVERSITY Dec 1-Sanford University ILL.,
The underlying of the illness found the lack
OF sympathy and understanding between the body and
te student affairs committee OF the faculty which vested the
absolute and final power of student These
important units in the makeup of university life widest
variance IN their They aligned against
attitude OF hostility and President Jordan the chief executive of
the university keeping hands remaining away
uy greater part OF the time and permitting the struggle
Prof 4 B. Clark head university art department has
BECOME within the last years dictator of the faculty
present student affairs committee he is todav the actual chief eu
I1lS word IS hnai IN all matters OF student discipline Incl
aenta from the student viewpoint he unpopular
most generally disiked member of the faculty.
Surrounding Clark and backing him in the carrying
Poes IS faculty Clique known referred
g by other members of the faculty the Indiana push
willing 70 lend themselves to the methods which he has introduced
o5 f & the real controlling force
ntagonsn1 In dealing comnee has taken an
ontroyeFsy The directly opposed and the result that
b IS sy @ experience teacher was gained
he @ yed ms & appointment @ to the Stanford faculty 1892 until suddenly
pne He stepped into his no aye part II, matters alters OF student
seemed @ 4 ] @ and when @ either broad minded dPomas qndng
REASONING GIVES WAY TO FORCE
R's bs root OF s % sa student e oHff m vsss BY y
Stanford There the generally accepted
sSss @ s resemble as discretion personal conue
sHsSs fBs estF 9atE0 cdi han tess and = 5sgalasaas
ate the T19n atdd T0 st % @ sa sasdamr snn9 5ad @ s
matters q discipline immensely popular with the
s 9 9 6 n FROM with the the ou adopted m PS i,
matters dsene coming SsR before Of theme th
ro fh Students eu IN @ 40 @ open manner that
r. body sAs"'s between
to- t. meet. meet lid The drinking problem tk university, March 1908
question dealing with individual % cases
generally prevalent state Of sa It Tas 'esn gne a d ndd o es tB
M G sds the Ps4S ar5 @ s ePsd P 5e Rnfand n6Hd and
they T orda SSSs'ss
a @ Committee & e5s B1sd succeed @ to the
ing certain clauses that aroused the bttes student
a Of % r saa no Fs.B qass bd and @ en-
has ceased despite assertions present
CLARK TAKES ARBITRARY ACTION
first f6 methods tho ong m0fd do BY the s; Clark 6 at dealing
in its M Ps Of Of @ we're 91al % Of @ the policy 1T has since pursued
OF the prominent students the university
and who knew nothing @ were Moulded w r I @ Of fhsaged ENG IN the parade
trial. but were asked general ueso @ b f b ao Informed
one the student body boroughV aid d as
& & the % d b thst the fe men who had
w e sf ground m % Pied 9 y other the = % its action followed
n mem chosen @ fop enlistment @ h Statement na % d rsy I guilty & with the the
d asked 8 m the I @ n M y out % % m ] to the qn M
dene that might hsSe be given I By the a neo by the T. for any
adjustments f o % ms a'H e s sssep u9 had 9Red for
xo@d e with nddua en- feelings asF aGy Rass4 m zach fis
determine the adssby general STRIKE a The eF ee an ssng @
o X BE on I'D TRGggh @ the radical : =
der apology @ any 0 bTeaehs @ dne nave @ D d offered BY
offered
bodv had
in
reerafion of s
1t the students; refused
OF
/ Francisco; and its rule of
THE SEED OF BITTERNESS Is SOWN
in
of OF the kind
@ a s eT s I Ths sadsn BODY
s5 aJe Jordan IAN
university
the Twill the eturmoi was still al IS heg
of
beginning Stanfords