Orleans County monitor. [volume] (Barton, Vt.) 1872-1953, 1910-01-05
CONTINUED FROM PAGE FIVE

S0CClOu ludI luGy Inlay, prepare UlIIS
and enact them into laws, in anoth-
er that they may grant charters and
in still another that they shall have
all other powers necessary for the
legislature of a free and sovereign
state. They now can do these things
and have legislative powers only in
concurrence with the senate.
(Amend. Art. 80
The result is that if one turns to
Section 9 to see what the powers of
the house of representatives are he
will find that it states them incOr-
rectly in at least eleven particulars;
nor can he ascertain what the true
sense of Section at present is until
he has carefully studied the same in
connection with ten different amend
ments. The courts and the bar can Of
course determine what the cOnstit1-
t1onal provision On a given point may
be, although some provisions by this
system Of amendments have been left
obscure; but to the average layman
Chapter 2 of the constitution and its
amendments abound in inconsistent
cles, and in parts are uninteIligible
to those who are not trained in de-
termining whether one provision tech
nically supersedes another or is re-
| pugnant thereto.
| The fundamental law of the state,
which ought to be the simplest and
most easily understood of all, has by
the process of years become the most
complicated. AS handbook for stu
dents, and surely an acquaintance
with the constitution Of our state
ought to be a part of the education of
at least every high school student, it
is most unsatisfactory
In the last fifty years we have been
compelled to rewrite our public stat
utes four times, in 1852, 1886 1894
and 1905, simply for the purpose Of
conveniently and logically writing into
the statutes the amendments then
existing. The same cOnsidera-
lions which make that desirable
and necessary in the case of the
statutes make it even more desir-
able and necessary in the case Of the
constitution.
The draft submitted is intended to
be a simple expression of the chapter
with its amendments as it in fact now
is, preserving so far as possible it's
archaic language, but rearranging the
order of sections so as to group to-
gether those which relate to one sub
ject.
CONCLUSION
, We recognize that the foregoing
proposals will undoubtedly seem to
some to go too far and to others not
to go far enough; but we unanimous
ly recommend them to the careful
2 consideration Of the next legislature
and of the people of the state There
is ground for honest difference of
opinion as to some of the details of
the present plan of government. There
are some incongruities which if the
constitution were being generally re-
vised it would probably be thought
best to remove; and there are other
4 safeguards than those We have recon-
' mended being introduced into the
q constitutions Of other states which
might perhaps proftably be brought
into our own. We have not, how
: ever, thought it best to propose too
: much.
;, In the first place, although the
J. wording Of the resolution is broad
!. enough to permit us to make any pro-
y pOsals we choose, in fact it's spirit
j. did not contemplate that we were to
o attempt any general revision of the
d constitution. A general revision
Y should be the work, if not Of a con-
stitutional convention, at least of q
commission OF general and very repre-
sentative character and embody the
+ result Of full, deliberate and oper
V public discussion.
i In the next place, we are not per
suaded that there is in fact at the
Y present time and under present con
IS ditions a necessity for any such gen
l. eral revision. If the time lock clause
= is eliminated (see Proposal One) anC
the possibility exists Of initiating
amendments at any session of the
legislature, the discussion of consti-
e tutional questions will be ENCOURAGED
ana whenever the people desire gen
# eral revision or radical change it viii
l. be manifested in some plain way.
\. To shorten this report, and for the
n purpose of the report only, the form
of the proposal is in some cases in
dicated without actually reprinting in
q full the section as proposed to be
amended. If the proposals or any OF
n them are approved by the Legislature
f they should express the sections in full
as amended, in the way now most
q commonly accepted for the expression
:. of any amendment either to constitu-
tons or statutes. In that way any
- amendments adopted can be inserted
r in their proper place without being
left to be interpreted in, and the diff
g f1culty in that regard with the present