The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1910-11-12
iTTuh ~ ,PpORrIO> WE>T.
Belief Thai o. l. \ No,r To I Is<-i INIT
Rarrtrari, BriiinS Law

Tn" court proc q nG~ winch have
h""n p"g 10 t's; ~" valid ~ of tn.
i"cislatIV' airport comment .lCt passed
-. D" special session 81 III" ~rtI" legs
IA % III 1917; AID approved nv GOV
Hugh's haV" for their purpos- u was
sg I'D K morally nv the members Of th,.
Leg slt, ire who were asked y.stc-duy
fo tn'.r opinion as TO the motive. an
al. 'mp' - upset tn r. Ak Nv racing
law. winch prevent .i,Ing a IN" race
lacks Weeks before the recent cl.C-
on n was SAID openly hat II IN" RepIhl-
cans w..g. beaten there wOu'd b" mad.
=, on" I'm Effort 10 ups-t tn" h..ttIrg
usIl which Gov Hughes forced through
ih" log slatvr"
80 '"rtain w.r" in. tnt"rorfg which
arr, king 10 ovnrtuTn the b,il Of IN.
unhtIcal result on Tuesday That on Mon
day la>r they Obtained from Just ~.
b'schon "f tn. supreme Court an ord. r
To show ca'I-" why review should not
h.' mad ~ tn now ortIonm"nts
ut tn S"nat' ard Assembly disirIC,,
Of IN" stat In" plea presented was
that ~" r.dist rlc'ing was a NOR" gerry
mandHr and that because Of ~ m,ny
voters w.r" deprived Of their right Of
franchise and ttlat therefore IT," amor.
Torment was Illegal
lhoS" who ar" attacking Tho Constt.
tutIonahtv NJ the 1885, apportionm.p,
draw attention TO tn" fact that IN. Hair
Agnew bIil was passed 10y he vof. of
Senator Wallace. vEn -,ICC"ehad Senator
Franchor Immediately aft"r rh. laftars
death and " ~ can no proved mat rh..
selection 81 Mr. NalIac" to rcpr.s.nf
RI DISTRICT for which h" voted was I'm.
cons ,tuiIonHl ID" leg Ility 81 ~" Hsrt.
Ag0"w law would ~ one" be- attacked
According 10 lawy"r- well informed on
constitutional questions who were seen
Yesterday there i NOT tn. least t,o-.,-
Iih'v that IN" tourt 81 Appeal. would
sustain such a contention They wished
20 sDeeS ANONYMOUSLY because the I.stIe
mas heen brought mo court hut they
~ald that IN" Court Of appeals IN lust
such disputes where member of the
Legislature has acted and voted IN good
faith and with belief thar he WAS en-
itl"d 10 ras' q vote had repeatedly upheld
the laws concerned
senator tgnsw On" Of The sponsors
for tho anti.betirnx hrlI SAID ye.te rday
thai III" Arguments made ~ the. Meas TO
m" courts wore sam lar 80 those mad, al
Albany 10y thO-" who protested against
~" ua--ags Of thu hIll Mr ignew
admitted 'hd' there Wa no CIIarIo" Of tho
pr"'""'iinGs succeeding hecs,r-" ~ the
I'm" IN" bili was passed IN" Legislature
Vas d'- fact" body and thar senator
Nallac" was n de faCtO nleInber
Charles collin a rnetnber Of the Ia "
firm 81 collin Wells 3 Hughes of . NASSAU u
street which has beaIn the proceedingH
'" Vest III" new sDpor ION men: law saId
yesterday that b" WIS not concerned with
any ~ the rsc"irack INTEREST,". He
Wa merely taking proceedings 10 Test
~" validity ~ IN. radsst Ticting because il
had practically dlsfrsn chi-ed -everaI
clients Tor whom h" was acting
AURtI-i B.IUDut chairman Of Yh.
Jockey club. said that the rhib was not
even indirectly Interested ia the. pro-
"H'''iIngs and thar be- AMI his ,plIeaRues
w"r" NOT 'v~n aware hat such proceedings
had been begun Joseph y Au.rbach
counsel 10 ~" Jockey club said that
neither hs' nor any ~ tho members ~ the
Jockey club had anything to do with IN"
action begun by Mr. Collin.