The Lake County times. [volume] (Hammond, Ind.) 1906-1933, 1910-02-11
therefore is five dollars.

now due the plaintiff from lot thirty
seven t37), block sixteen 16l. Oah
Park addition to Tolleston, the sum OF
one and 65-100 ($1es) dollars; that the
plaintiff is entitled to the foreclosure
OF said lien against said lot and that
the equity of redemption of the defend
ants, Mary Regain and --- Regain, her
husband, whose true christian name Is
unknown. Walter s.. Ross and -
Ross. his wife; Charles c. Teare and
- Teare, his wife, whose true chris
tian name is unknown. as to said lot
be foreclosed and cut OF; and that the
plaintiff is entitled to reasonable at
forney's fee for the foreclosure of said
lien and that a reasonable sum there
fore is five dollars.
The court further finds that there is
now due the plaintiff from lot thirty
eight (3s), block sixteen f16), Oak
Park addition to Tolleston, the sum
of one and 65-1oo (s1.65) dollars; that
the plaintiff is entitled to the forecIos-
ure of said lien against said lot and
that the equity of redemption of the de-
PENDANTS. Mary Regain and - Regain,
her husband, whose true christian name
is unknown; Walter s. Ross and -
Ross. his wife: Charles c. Teare and
- Teare. his wife, whose true chris
tian name is unknown. as to said lot be
foreclosed and cut OFF; that the plain
tin is entitled to a reasonable attor-
ney's fee for the foreclosure of said
lien and that a reasonable sum there
fore is five dollars.
The court further finds that there Is
now due the plaintiff from lot twenty
six (26), block nineteen CID, Oak Park
addition to Tolleston, the sum OF one
and s5-1o0 (s1.85) dollars; that the
plaintiff Is entitled to the foreclosure
OF said lien against said lot and that
the equity of redemption OF the defend
ants, C. w. Kte1lian and - Kje1lian,
his wife, whose true christian name
- unknown; Esther e. Porter and 49,
Porter. her husband. whose true chris
tian name is unknown. Charles C. Teare
and - Teare. his wife, whose true
christian name Is unknown, as to said
lot be foreclosed and cut on: that the
plaintiff is entitled to a reasonable at
torney's fee for the foreclosure of said
lien and that a reasonable sum there
fore is five dollars.
The court further finds that there is
now due the plaintiff from lot twenty
nine (29), block nineteen (19). Oak
Park addition to Tolleston, the sum of
one and 65-10o (s1.65) dollars; that the
plaintiff IS entitled to the foreclosure
of said lien against said lot and that
the equity of redemption Of the defend
ants, Louis Rosenfeldt and - Rosen-
feldt, his wife, whose true christian
name is unknown; Esther E. Porter
and Porter, her husband, whose
true christian name is unknown; Char
les c. Teare and - Teare, his wife
whose true christian name is unknown.
as to said lot be foreclosed and cut off;
that the plaintiff is entitled to a rea-
sonabie attorneys fee for the foreclos-
ure OF said lien and that reasonable
sum therefore is five dollars.
The court further finds that there is
now due the plaintiff from lot thirty
600. block nineteen G9), Oak Park
addition to Tolleston, the sum OF one
and G5-100 (s165) dollars: that the
plaintiff is entitled to the foreclosure
OF said lien against. said lot and that
thelequity of redemption OF the defend
ants. Louis Rosenfeldt and - Rosen-
fields. hts wife. whose true christian
name is unknown, as to said lot be
foreclosed and cut of; that the plain
tiff is entitled to . reasonable attor-
neys fee for the foreclosure OF said
lien and that a reasonable sum there
fore is five dollars.
The court further finds that there is
now due the plaintiff from lot thirty
fve (35). block nineteen (1s). Oak
Park addition to Tolleston. the sum
of one and $500 ($1.e5) dollars: that
the plaintiff is entitled to the foreclos-
ure of said lien against said lot and
that the equity of redemption ot the
defendants, Gustav Ruffer and
Rufrer. his wife, whose true christian
H. - col LOT hf.
foreclosed and cut off; that the plain
tiff is entitled to a reasonable attor-
ney's fee for the foreclosure OF said
lien and that reasonable sum there
fore is five dollars.
The court further finds that there is
now due the plaintiff from lot thirty
six (36), Oak Park addition to Tolles-
ton, the sum of one and 65-100 ($1.65s
dollars; that the plaintiff Is entitled to
the foreclosure of said lien and that
the equity of redemption of the de-
PENDANTS, Gustav Runfer and ----- Ruff
err. his wife. whose true christian name
IS unknown q s to said lot be foreclos ed
and cut off; that the plainttff is en-
titled to a reasonable attorneys fee for
the foreclosure of said lien and that a
reasonable sum therefore is five Col
lars
The court further finds that there is
now due the plaintiff from lot forty
seven (4D, block twenty eight (2S),
Oak Park addition to Tolleston. the
sum Of one and $1,000 ($1-e5) dollars;
that the plaintiff is entitled to the
foreclosure of said lien against said
lot and that the equity OF redemption
of the defendants, Edward A. WEIGH
and - WEIGH. his wife, whose true
CHI ria tian name is unknown as to said
lot be foreclosed and cut of; that the
plaintiff is entitled to a reasonable at
torney's fee for the foreclosure of said
lien and that reasonable sum there
fore is Ave dollars.
The court further finds that there is
now due the plaintiff from lot forty
eight (4s). block twenty eight (2S),
Oak Park addition to Tolleston, the sum
of one and 65-10o ($1.65) dollars; that