The sun., 1910-01-09
SGOODHOCKEY
DEFEATS CORNELL'S TEAM N
TOURNAMENT GAME.

Neither side scores IN First Half and the
Play IL nAeged-HarVard Dy Coed
Team work Makes FOur Goals In
second Perisd-Hicks Scores Tnree.
Harvard won the second game Of the
intercollegiate hockey tournament played
In the 81. Nicholas Rink lsst night The
players from Cambridge defeated Cornell's
team BY q SCORE OF goals to o. Only one
half OF the game was really worth witness
ing. that was the second. Then Harvard's
team played real hockey and showed good
team work. Some OF the players. particu-
larly Hicks, gave clever exhibitions OF stick
work.
Hicks was the bright star Of the winning
team. but he was well supported ON the line
by Gardner. DunoAn and HOrnblower.
When this line really got going the men
skated fast. the passes were frequent and
clever and then the shooting was good and
straight II was really the best exhibition
OF hockey THAT Harvard has shown in long
time. In former years the Harvard team
has relied largely ON weight and strength to
win games. and as a result there has always
bsen much rough play.
Ths year the players are not nearly up
70 the former standard of Harvard AZ to
weight. but they are fast, plucky players
seems TO be the weak spot OF the team.
True he stopped all shots sent at him last
night but this was not very hard work.
Chadwick In slow and deliberate and plays
q very open game. II he gets against some
some team that sends the puck In hard
and straight he Ia bound to be scored on.
Cornell did fairly well. but the team was
clearly outmatohed. The players skate
well. but have little idea of team work and
Ia Na0 nil m In
dividual play. Then the players can't
shoot. They are slow at recovery and
had chances to score against Harvard II
they had been able to take advantage OF
the openings. Crassweller and Matchneer
did the best work for Cornell and Vail
at goal stopped many difficult shots.
The game was a very clean one. There
was little Intentional tripping and no rough
play to speak OF. Not player was injured.
MaRner got q hard fall toward the end
Of the fret half and bumped his side rather
hard so that he took a rest Of few min
utes, Not q single player was sent to the
bench. 80 the contest was In marked con-
trast to the one on Friday evening when
foul plays were the chief characteristic.
In the first half the play on both sides
was very ragged IL often happens that
whom rood team Eoes against poor team
the good team cannot play its game, and
did not show up we'll. Neither side seemed
Abls to do anything with the puck II was
all indiv idual playing and the puck was
kept hustling up and down the ice Once
or twice Harvard tried some team work
but Cornell easily broke IL up. TOWARD
the end OF the half Cornell sent three shots
At the Harvard cage and should have scored
but the shots were raFged and lacked force
In the second half things changed won
derfuiiy The whistle had hardly. blown
when the Harvard line got in motion and
way across the ice the puck was carried
70 Oyrnshs sc.i Tw:Ss shots were ,,s,a. made:
n seconds the line carried the puck down
the rink and there was q scrimmage in
front Of the net and Hicks pushed the puck
By YAH tos the nr.. goal Soon "a, after ., this
he reached cover points p0eition.
work and showed up ysG: Jones suc;
fsii. Ssso'1 hornSiowsr % Sss % made % q shot q once
from almost the centre OF the side line
and landed the puck In the net. This was
.ecGnds ..s han ave Sus ~ the ns
goal and when Il was shot II landed in the
cotner, IL was passed out and Hicks got
very clever SxhI6ition Of stick work and
dodEinf throhEhthe Cornell team. carried
the puck close up to the net and scored.
oSass that L: msSs sRs !os
wick at goal on Harvard's team. Hicks
scored the third goal In 10 minutes 9 seconds
q RaS SSs s2Ss had S % a. a%s.. G iSs
whole length OF the rink. The last goal
was scored by Hicks after 70 minutes rs
seconds q Plcy ne sSok m or .snss4 from
uneasisted