The sun., 1910-05-12
HETNEE DOVS NOT TESTIFY
ar THE EVIDENCE ~, CASE
To JURY TODAY.

Testimony Oasred for ths Defenre Was
ChlsFy ~ to ,hs Assets % yhs United
C0pper Company, uhlcb AFeFlSured
ont at S8o,OO0. COO by witnesses.
The cass against FFits Augustus Hsinss
will 60 20 the jury tO-nisht IN al proba-
bility. The defence rested yesterday
afternoon rather uneKpsctsdly and the
summing up will begin this morning.
John B. StGnchheld will sum up for
Hsinzs. United States Attorney Wise
Ia 20 follow for the Government.
HoinEs did not take the witness stand.
In expectation Of hearing HeinEss own
defence % himself crowd had gathered
in the United States Circuit Court and
this crowd seemed TO be made up Of good
many Of his friends. Mining men from
Montana were very much in evidsnoe.
The defence put in some more evidence
regarding the value of tho properties
still belon ginR 10 the United Copper Com
pany. Chester Glass. q director of the
company and president of the New York
and Pittsburg Coal Company. wa called
10 tell % the value of the 1000 acres Of
coal lands In ths Pitasburg district which
turned up among the United Copper Co
pany's assets when the defence began
to put In It's sids on the previous day. Ths
Government did not End this asset on the
books II the company and Yesterday Mr..
Wise objected TO all this evidencs on the
ground that no deed had been produced
20 show that the United Copper Company
owned the laRds. Judge HouRh. how
ever. admitted testimony Of Ar Glass
10 the effect that these coal landa were
valued az is.O00.000. When, however.
two negro portes brought IN two big
boXes containing bituminous coal taken
from the drillings the Court ruled them
ont on the Governments obiectira that
the coal had been taken out only recently
and not back in 1907. Hein1es lawyers
argued IN vain that borings had to Be
fresh 70 be Of any value. Tho coal lands
were bought through tho New York and
Pitisburg Coal Company from Arthur
u. Heinle for 'si7.IOo
John d. Bangs. a mineralogiat, Who
had examined the borings. testified a. TO
the Pittshurg seam of bitumino,s coal
and in answer 10 a long Hypothetical
Question gave an estimated value 20 the I
property ot 81. .o0o. 600 He said that /
he regarded this A. conservative.
Another Ba.O0O.OnO Cestimatedl turned I
up among the assets Of Heinse's compzny \
when Patrick A. O'Farrell gave this az |
me IN saile le. oI - me company nail interest
n h nc nc sIs.u9 eCrss OF nrttlsh Soiumoa
Pacific. Ten per cent. OF this property. II
~ 49,. ne N,tIless, VINO u pSesloent OF me
nII,trh f,II,i N9iunlna copper company, was
..u,t am ~ sH nc -. vas the nnest
.,nlner .tll ana IN the wOrld. NO deed ior
s ,i, PppeIV had peen produced, MI;
~. 80 ouJ.ouSt bt the Couft showed
!! M luay W uhe Ine tes,hnony TOT what
~ 49, va Sor,h ana ass 20 look AZ coilec-
doh ol Photographs nom britlen To-
iu.lpA. ~,
~ ony Witness Tor helnne VINO Wes
-snlectSd oy me prosecutor 70 much
oj M a &C., ANIMATION was Albert FRANK.
VINO tes,,I,eu on iuesciay a. 70 the value
ot me onio copper uomfany and some
M me othef mines SUI bebonging 70 the
Onted.
m. IN Iegard " ths NeWpoTt mine MI.
W.. W. got trsnk u admit that his state .
Inents regarding the amount OF ore IN it