Albuquerque morning journal. [volume] (Albuquerque, N.M.) 1903-1926, 1910-09-06

NEIH HHM NAn4FfM.MM NLHM.NL "HHttNH |f
os4f.tattnRfpd
- ths .p.
800 ralf
- msss.d - ION.
1900, a. tha emnipAe,
t p.tnsteN FL.
X. maart s.ms
~ ~.m.ane IN
ttas =, tf,eif fnfrr.
n. ~. st6 a-s~en..n au mon mis-
a,E,st VI ~. l0ala,ea
=. hrte N4an IA ~. fn-
M M. .,rrt. g,neras4 lta.
~ 49, t.t.r.t3f. 5.nvnerrc
a.atsIn, ~ ,-en,,frn au interstate
.spraa.f. n, as.,nt ayA,x ra-a#aa4btt
t @..ii.,~ \, .4aer ri fadYoa
~ r 49, ~ III. .nH Fmh
$50 ,a,t,.s ewnfgtes a,saeed ia
80 .es -,,rntnp II t,alra
frFreN. $1,000 ~ tripna b84 N4at
$50 sstshbgt1d 4, or4ef fittt 81. rs
,sgN.atn.o and elose shrartatan 90
~. r,s1fieaf vorEfpe of minas thr
49, snuiie noes w pr.eeutinr tbe
enormous loss IN i..e thnf actura
-nm tbr .v.t.4en ~ pts ANA fire fn
tnsI ana efl1ar minef mus 8r devised
o,a .dastae
,Tbf4 Legislation fa f4 the interest
ana fef tbe bent.lt ~ class -tho
oarknnmauMbut lnet arc 90 large %
.t.ea 49, tnefr ~rslfar. Ia 49, fmuer-
tant 4. IN tunBc M lnfee thar smile
h might III oharaoterlzed aF ritrs ley
fsfatl8a "a ef4atls fof the public
welfare and rannot H. accumulated
privlleuea ar asiaetionstIe
We need. and nope we fIIafl ST.
tare. mere III such legislation.
But there q Il kita ~ l~e.l4latlor
10 which would refer. That does
legislation ana j hope + can make the
diytinefIon clear between This ana
what have been describing
"A ugmber III statutes ave been
pass4d lu The statsf against combine
tiont Of conspiraoies % restrain trade
ID aupprets com petition and thorf ilsts
been 81 metimas an attempt 10 insert
~ sach statutes Il grofisH or "a section
sxemptln1 farmers 08 other GLASSES |
from the operation OK the stitutt
"a ~ enable fhe exempted b0 eH 90 |
corner products and fale prices
while IA other elfss in the ccmfnun
ls ecn do so
The supreme court has held that |
suoh law gives an undue privilege 10
a particular tiass ia the community. |
creates an anjnFt exemption npm thf
operation ~ d useful law. denies tIt |
equal protection of the laws violates |
the contribution ana " invalid
Again. the federni aHti-trust law |
has been held by the supreme count
10 dcnounce combinations. "a obsiruct /
Interstate trade "a aus person a.
The last sefslon 81 congress. IN an apr
preparation bill, some t201,0 o was
appropriated Tor the enforcement nf
The antitrust lass. To this uppfopri- |
alton an amendment WAS proposed
M..4.f4t4. 4Naa .. r..rt ~ aim conn I
600 nhould be used 10 the prosecution
~ the Workingmen engaged in % boy
colt ia violation OF The statute.
THAT ls not the Wa3 the amend
ment read. bui lft8t was in % way IT, /
necessary effect.
"a majority II tho house after =
very hot discussion. rejected iht
amendment vi the ground that 81 wnf
Vicious rlaEs legislation As q mat
Ter o. fact the money previously APE
prcprlatea 10 enforce the antitrust
hsa never been used Ton the
Droreeutspn az N%arkinwmeu engaged
IA such 81 ycntt. netause there was no
occasion fcr nuen use ana in All
probability thc money boh apHro-
urlated van never b. nseti tor Aueil q
puf nose.
aisuf 1; vae thf proptr siew IL tho |
majority. VINO ofcu against the
A~m~ndment that on ufiueiplp such b
exemption 81 privilege should
~, n. ,lnrinred ana approved 10
statute. have nor tine slightest "a
nactatiau that tao none wfii ever he
sea for nnytbing hut the pratecu-
ifnn ~ forporntons and business
u,ms rspug6d h continuation la rec
~ trade ban 40 a. inc hands
or ne executive AGAINST $50 unlawful
ut4na,E ..fsf.t n,A tHrIa p,aEa /