The Washington herald. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1906-1939, 1910-10-12
United States Supreme Court.
TUESDAY, October II, 1s1O1

| q Nr. Attorney General wickegzham for the ap-
RELIANT
No , original Commonwealth of Virginia. e7m-
plsuan,. IS state o.: West Virginia. reassign1t f1I
argument on Monday January i6 1871. on motion
~ Mr.. W e.. Conlev fsF the defendant
No Sc. ScsboaUd Air Line RAILWAY. plaintiff I1
errtr. IS Fines, y. Duval. motion ~ dismiss Ct
affirm submitted rs Mr.. William g. Douglas Tor the
defendant IL error ~ support q fLe motion, AID
py Mr. II. A. Herbert Mr.. BENJAMIN Aiicyu, Mr.
Richard +. Whitley, and Mr.. Walter HAT Neal
for the plaintiff IN error IN oppositioa thereto and
iesve granted counsel for defendant in error 10 lie
reply on ~ before Friday next.
No 5s6 The State q Minnesota eX re- Jalme
NJ larsen. plaintiff in errut Hugh X Scott. as
auditor o. the County 4 HCrueriB; motion % ad
Plaintiff IN eyrur.
No 500 Isaac A. Msnsegr. appellant. vs. ms
United states motion 20 advance submitted b. Mr.
Walter ;. Penheld for the appellant.
No 800. The United States plaintiff 10 error. IS
Gustav E, Kisseli and Thomas p. Hanei, rr
assigned fer argument on THURSDAY. November 10
/ $50. on mOgi0n n Mr.. William @. Osborn for tls
defendants IN eTror.
No. 700 william D'Altgu Mann e. a.. petitioners
vs. Samuel DenUster, petition Tor wit o. Ger
| tioTau 10 the United States Circuit Court of AIe
Ieals for the Secrnd circuit submitted by Mr.. Al
| bert 4. Wray for the petitioners. and hy Mr
Charles o. Mas and Mr.. james A. Wakefield tol
the respondent.
Z =
Patrick Lancer petitioner; motion Tor leave 20 als
petition for a wri Il mandsmus submitted Do
Mr.. Wnford X. smith f6r the Ietitioner
No SIS. ". :. Harlan r a.. appellants ~ T.
T. Mcti0urin. United States marshal. &c; and
No. sc. Robert Gallagher. appellant IS ]. r.
McGounn. United States marshal &c. motion %
reassign for hearing hsfUTe A mn bench and ~
/ wits q oeTtioTHu herein presented 10y Mr. W. "
| Flournoy FOR the appellants. and opposed by Alr
Attorney General Wickersham for the appellee and
motions denied.
No. Es. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Com
| Tany, plaintiff IN error - " p Scott: motion
| 10 advance 70 be head with No 2s submitted by
| air. C. H. Norman for the plaintiff In efros.
No. 100 The Bucks Stove & Range Company
| appellant vs. The American Federation Of Labor
| e. Al.
No aai. The American Federation 4 Labor ct al
/ appellants vs. The Bucks Steve & Range Com
/ parv; and
Ma. 81 Samuel Gonpers ct al PETITIONERS vs.
The Bucks S,5ye & Range Company; reassigued foi
argument on Monday. January l6. 1911, after thi
case already assigned fer that day On motion q
Mr. Jackson II. Ralston for The American Fedora
/ ton Of Labor e. al.
No Ga. The Sec and Fox indians Of the yis
sissipTi in Iowa. appellants. rs. The sac and Fol
| Indians Of the MissisSppi In Oklahoma ard IT,
| United States Motion to advance submitted by Mr.
( harry Mohun for the appellee Indians.
No. 5is. The United States. appellant IS. The
/ Fidelity Trust Company sc. motion 10 dismiss q
| affirm submitted by Mr.. Barry Mohun Mr.. A, X
| Server and Mr. Paul Fuller. for the appellee i,
support 81 the motion. and by Mr.. Attorney Gen
| eral Wiekersham and Mr.. Barton Corneau, for Oh,
appellant in opposition thereto with leave coIu
sci for appeIlees TO file reply brief on or before
| Tuesday next.
| No. co. Thomas B. Stuart e. al. petitioners. vs.
! Union Pacific RAILROAD Company; petition for writ
Of certorari 10 the United states Circuit Court 81
/ Appeals for the Eighth circuit submitted BY Mr.
/ Louis 7. Michener. Mr. Thomas b. Stuart, anc
| Mr. Joseph c. Helm for the petitioner and by Mr.
| Maxwell Evsrts. Mr.. y. H. LOOMS Mr. CLAYTON c
| Dorsey. and William d. Hodges for the respond
| ent-
No. go MARY u. snce. petitioner. vs. Charlie
/ T. the United States Circiit Court Of Appeals 70
| the Second circ--it submitted by AiT William J
| Grace. Mr. Frederic @. Seoheld, and Mr.. Theodor
1 +. HanccCs for the petitioner and by Mr. Charlie
/ L. Store Mrs. J. l. Ernst, and MTS- ID. X. Cobl
for the respondents.
| No. as. In the matter Of the petition Of H. II
Loving trustee; motion 10 advance submitted By
Mr.. William F. Bradshaw in behalf Of counsel 70
/ Loving. trustee.
/ No 4e5 J. Harvey Laiew et al. &C. et al. ap
pellants. vs.. Tennessee Copper Company: and
| Nc. so. George Peabody WetmcTe, appellant vs
| Tennessee Copper Company motions 10 dismuss sub
mitted by Mr. John h. FTkntz. Mr. Howard Cor
nick. and Mn. Martin Nogel for the appellee, il
| support o, the motions and by Mr. Henry r.. Clos
son for the appellants in No. 4s5 Ia opposition
| thereto.
| No. ISL. Salvatore L. Rocca, plaintiff in error vs.
| George F. Th5m9spl; motion TO advances slbmit.c,
| BY Mr.. Samuel T. Fisher IN behalf Of counsel ~
! the plaintiff in erroE
No esS Arthur p. Heinze. petitioner. vs. TIL
United Stats; petiticl fer a writ Of certoraIi q
| the United States Circuit Court of apr ais for th
Second circuit submitted by Mr.. John Mason Brow
fer the petitioner. with leave 10 the Attorney Gen
| eral 20 file brief fer the respondent within On
week.
! No 81. James r. Holt. plaintiff in error vs.
The United States; leave granted 70 file ceTtife,
copy q rule q coITt below on motion # 3ir Hug
NJ. Caldwell for the plaintiff in error
| No IA iorigaall. state of Oklahoma, complain
ant, vs. The Atchison Topeka and Santa Re Pail
way Company ct al leave granted to tle demurre
| Of the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Rzilrosi
Company on motion Of M. Il. L Bell In that be
hzn.