Little Falls herald. [volume] (Little Falls, Morrison County, Minn.) 1889-1950, 1910-03-04
TAI | ERS
READ At PROBE J / [. ! !:
correspondence Covers rs Land
Office Matters.
PINCHoT HAS SURPRISE


FaIsehood Against ealIinser Is
Based on a Communication From J.
~s "A. Ronald, a Former Law Partner Of
the secretary-conversations With
the President Ruled Out.
Washington, March 2.-There was
q surprising development in the Bal
linger-Pinchot investigation when Gift
ford Pinchot announced to the COM
mittee that he based his charges that
Secretary Ballinger had been guilty
of making statements to the president
that were "absofutely false in three
essential particulars" not upon a let
ter from Mr.. Ballinger himself, but
upon letter written by J. T. Ronald,
a former law partner of Mr.. Ballinger,
to DR.. Lyman Abbot. Mr.. Pinchot
said a copy of this letter, with anno-
tations, was forwarded by Mr.. Balm
ger to the president.
Pinchot admitted, when questioned
by the committee, that the three
statements in the Ronald letter, which
he declared to be false, had previ-
ously been covered by a letter written
by Mr.. Ballinger himself to the presi-
dent, in which Mr.. Ballinger had stat
ed what the witness admitted was a
true statement of the facts.
Mr.. Pinchot said he did not attempt
to reconcile these two facts.
Much correspondence between Pres
ident Taft on the one hand and
Messrs. Pinchot, Ballinger and Gar
field on the other was read into the
record. In the letters Of the presi>
dent confidence in Mrs Ballinger is
frequently expressed and in one OF
them, to Mr.. Pinchot, CLAWS is re-
ferred to as disingenuous person,
possessed of one idea and a man whom
the executive could not permit to re-
main in the public service for the rea-
son that to do so would be subversive
of discipline.
Garfield Letter to President.
Former Secretary Garfield, in let,
ter to the president, pointed out that
the basic difference between Mr.. Bal.
inger and himself was that Mr. Bal
linger seemed DESTROYS of taking ad.
vantage of every loophole to injure
the cause of the people, while he had
acted in just the opposite way.
Mr.. :Ballinger was quoted in a letter
to the president as saying that he be-
Heved much of the animus against
him was due to the fact that he was
compelled to find SO many of his
predecessors acts illegal.
An agreement was reached not tC
quote the substance of conversations
| with the president in order to avoid
placing the president in an embar
! RAISING position.
At brief executive session of the
committee it was announced thai
counsel for Mr.. PinchOt would not
press for ruling on the point as to
! whether or not witnesses would be
allowed to testify as to conversations
| with the president. The subject. was
thereupon dropped.
George w. Pepper, representing Mr.
Pinchot, had agreed that the summon
ing of the president would be unde
sirable, but had declared that the con
versations were necessary as tht
| foundation for further testimony.
Pinchot asserted in his preliminary
statement that Ballinger, in letter
had been guilty Of three misrepre
sensations to the president. The wit
ness wished to point out the first O.
these, he said, by the declaration tina
the letter and the exhibits "don'
| match