The Guthrie daily leader. [volume] (Guthrie, Okla.) 1893-1996, 1910-11-29


complied vib ara ~ scc ii hc bin o rights when
A toleal power y inherent ~ the people ara government Y
general welfare and they have alter The when
1 hg 6pS S @ ss'S s uSa s'' '0'e e '
the public good required and for the further reason a upon
The admission the state became Of al the rights dominion
equal footing With them in all respects whatever intended
astop mis- rpeabe law congress
m e & ae q M & @ 'e Z pese q epeas m % ln a~s @ g cOnHm % %
@ w esnn II % Se nGe @ ea @ SS @ @ g @ n
and ordinance eyocabe naempt made sen the state
towards Lesueur ia2 No 10; sui " atf
general assembly XIV for n o onstu ~ w q ade aSga Herein " @
for the removal of the re NY Jefferson
the city sedal The retnhn ohf'7 lf The art o.
admitting the the Union TIE qeion the convention called
pursuant thereto and subsequent ne state ~ conformity there
be removed herefom wit6ert he ccre The rsitcd saes
The control o. the rntc1 es e caslon ne cagiml
propositions We're thereby offered to esoo ae Tetrr q
asesSs nDag y T1i &c donEsa a%sa % . 5 @ a a gs @ & s
e pdss @ s9 q Ts Ss s ss sea .s@s s E @ ~ M s @ sropos @
uons were upon The condition that 7 ion ion , NJ sroyde % Oy
and each tract Of land sold by the ~ s fan md after the
anaer authority Of f e % the s ted @ s e@s Of
admission and declared sat ts ordinance sn he rreyob without
which Jefferson City located lots sold By m state and the seat
adopted the legislature appointed commissioners who selected land
at said city unless by the the United States The
court held and said
eocay people
governmental subject epeaiable
na fsSe @ @ 1s sn be- 3 the e nd d' shpS 3 ne % @ was
said by the court in Arm0na al Board Of Co. Com Of Dearborn
appellants who claimed vested right in the location
IF the claim available clothes the with power
county, and the administration @ justice @ in it. The state @ Itself stripped
Of one Of the inherent and essential attributes Of oyeregnty
sovereignty and the constitution But assuming that by adopt
nmr up The the state e io @ @ po ana @ 9 a m O a' unon @
that such binding the extent the
thus Federal
hence such surrender would be void Void for the % that as the
powers
the constitution vested in congress power to wrest rom the people Of
involving right condition precedent their admission
enforced right to remove the capital Of state pursuant
exercise the exercise political and municipal
right Of soveregny which the state Eoweess barter away by com
The states have cnded the as their the admis
oa authority congress be construed invest congress an
constitution has not And if So does the new
the Union horn Of its power pro no BY the agent authorized to o2sn
better opinion would clearly be that could not impose an
re9a as i had no original sa power n " % enact ct Or & enforce e
when Alabama admitted with
@ @ 0sa g % ome n ueSe S 70 al the s i q M oes @ 81 S m
this right diminished by the public lands
provided legislative
stipulation agreement granting municipal
right sovereignty the United
aon would have been void imperative because the United
constitutional jurisdiction
eminent domain within the limits
In the where it is expressly granted
In
1905,
tho Federal Constitution into the Union the
mission her all the
which belong other the constitution
n
status people
coming into the Unonthe
the constitution belong the original
the Oklahoma
a regulating o
Oklahoma all the other the
the Oklahoma
mssn knew that oklahoma must enact its laws regulating
roice
state Mississippi Il Otto ss2i error the Supreme
originally
circuit Of Warren county by the Attorney General of
behalf the the plaintiffs
onir In ham q h urr OF ex scd