New-York tribune., 1910-12-18
rBy The Associated Press ]

lBy The Associated Press.l
London, Dec 17-If the results in six dis
tricts yet to be declared are unchanged the
new House OF Commons will be similar to
the old
The government coalition tonight is as
follows: Liberals 95S: Laborites. 4S: Ma
tionalists, Y; independent Nationalists. 10:
total, 393
The opposition is: Unionists, I'll
Three former Liberal seats-one Unionist,
one Nationalist and one Independent Ma
tionalst-are yet to be heard from.
Two Independent Nationalists, James Nc
Kean and L. Ginnell, are included among
the adherents of OBrien, but they are not
SO dets ched from Redmond as are the regu-
lar O'Brienites, and are likely to rejoin the
NatiGnalists. In some tables also j. Ward,
member for Stoke-on-Trent. is included
among the Liberals CWard generally is con-
sidered Laborite), which would make the
Liberals and Unionists, including the
Speaker exactly equal at the conclusion Of
i7D-272 each.
Il. the elections over, moderate coun-
sells are prevailing, and there is no longer
talk of home rule on the Parnellite plan.
The Liberal policy is now confined to self
government for Ireland, subject to the con-
troll OF the imperial parliament
On the other side. the responsible Unionst
organs admit that the government has re-
ceived a mandate for a Parliament bill
which would abolish the veto power of the
House Of Lords.
The general opinion is that the Unionist
leaders in the end will accept the bill
rather than drag the King into the party
arena. which naturally would follow the
7 dch Yain nf tl1,, yIzo
government would be compelled to ask the
King for guarantees in the nature CT the
appointment Of five hundred peers to out
vote the Unionists in the upper house.
,, The veto disposed of. John Redmond
naturally would demand Home Rule. II is
also possible that before the wishes of Ire
lane are granted the government will en-
deavor to pass the electoral reform bill,
which would abolish plural voting and pro-
vide that all elections should be held On
one day. The Master of Elibank, who, as
Chief Liberal whip, organized the campaign,
: has strongly advised such course his ex-
pefience having shown him that the large
majority Of plural voters are Tnionists, and
| in some constituencies are actually outvot-
ing the residents
Results of the PoIfinus.
The results of the polIings by districts
follow:
Nottingt amshire fIsassetiaw)-w E Hume
Williams (Enionisp: majority 215 No change.
Huntingdonshre Ramsey)--O locker Lamp
Armagh 1south,--Dr: c. o'Nefll GNafionahso:
'a1lsn semeTset sS; WellsG So ena j. sanaxs Unionist
majority, Al 2es4 81 Nc change. =
Rickett d-iberall: majority. 4.171. No change
Bedfordshire Iuton}-T. G. Ashton libersle;
majority. 91s: No change
f,yayr1x III
majority. 1.124. NJ change
knsGt e coHng WefP M n esnsa
Roxburghshire-Sir J. Jardine Qiberan ma
DevonShire (aonifonl-Naior c; Morrson-Bell
(Unionist1: matsrity l.a1o No change; &C., ,orss
Yorkss1 ire, East Riiine ,5Buekrose,---sir L.
White GTsR sb9r5b abornbaT 2 Ne Rsnda ehdsfe ie
| eraij: majority. ss3. No change.
majority. 9a1.1 81 a This is Liberal gain
Mavo tMesty-W. Doris tNationalst): majority
Tyrone lF.asty@w. A. Redmond (Nationaiist)
to5 qiatGI na a;aify ishSnrs s.s.2 No ehange
Dublin County tSouth)--W- Cotton > lNau2naf ION +
is errs aj@Fl5y %Es l }eiS sailiTan Saonails
| jurity l. .255 No change .,-..,,.,,or-r.rav
St. Andrews Burghs-Malor AnstIuiIei ~.
| d:nionist1: majority. - Unionist gain rms
was a Liberal gain IN the last eieetiofi' WHICH,
the majority was oS. ,.,o,, ,,,.
Derbyshire UIkestonp-- - Sloly o'ipeTa'' iiin
lcrity, 4 Oh. No change
London, Dec. 16--J- l. Garyin, editof ei
..'Cbe Observer who, IL Is rumoTea. Was
,he Author of Mr. Balfour's referendum pro-
| nosai- and whom David Lioyd-Georse IN a
spsecb last week described the man who
sur-I.lied the Conservative party with IDEAS
writing in his Sunday paper to-day, urges
tho I-njonists still TO endeavor 70 obtain a
constitutional settlement by consent
tie government refuses TO colni'roiiiise'
fhen the Unionists must fight to the END
All depends upon the tlrmness CT lhe
Lords. who he says, should proceed Win
ti,eir own reform schemes as though noth-
inc had happened ami allow the ministers
IN create FIVE hundred peers if they dare
| ur. Garvin admits that the King is bouno
by the constitution to create peers, but the
responsibility for such creations rests WIFE
the ministers. and such perversion OF con
stitutional ideas, they are understood
elsewhere, especially in Tn United States
as the creation of so many peers with OILY
a bare majority WAS bound to be so unpop-
ular that a reaction in favor Of the 7 Iion
ISIS would socn set in. He was comment [;
new yeers wcuid refuse TO pass the honie
r r. OConner writing in a Sunday news
paper, rejoicss that all Indications reveal .
determined, resolute and prompt spiiit on
the part of th4 ministers. He says that
the veto quesi on viii be faced the VeI
first night of the new session and VIII De
niIrsIied TO the bitter end. without delay
ar hesitation. The House OF LORDS pos
sibiv might insert certain amendments "a
! hi ,r.zxr rc-f he