Omaha daily bee. (Omaha [Neb.]) 187?-1922, 1910-05-03
Declares Little DANGEROUS Drn
Found in Bodies Of Dead NJ,
DR HEKToET on THE Gl
Attorney oaotes from Experts b
During Cross-ExamInauon.
WITNESS Is BADLY OoNTUsEl
Defense uOes Not Heuucst tourt q"
Appoint Jumrufssiun Cf IA
perts - MAKE
AnuI-si sis,

KANSAS CITY Mar --fr Waiter 4
EHupe chicago fcsIca.a-.s.. tod Bt t1e .
Irle murfyr rr.H' trla- the alleged ff- .
su|.s of Tfa search fur p..-Trs Insofar as A
the t71.ar.rl .-r.s -errnre' Invest CATIONS .
were concerned. rH admitted they had re- 3
s4I.ed .u radIuE bur little dangerous drugs .
TEI.h blt one exception. SAID Tor. HHlne-- De
found cyanide only whom collaborating with 4
Dr Victor g. Vaughan gt Ann A-bor Mfra .
Iu q par, - The st1mB"n of Coion".
Thomas H. sucpe testified Dr. HaIn+s. he /
found d tro-ruud~rdtr of q grain Of strT-
cAu.uv The PMS clan zsid small trace
% 1hr same drug was located In the balm
with The aid o. B- Vaughan. Dr. 9aines
testified hs discovered cyanide in lne
stomach
only slight traces of strvcuiniue were
claimed uv ur lIaiues 30 have been found
81 ihe stomach Of Chrisusn Swope. j was
N belief ~ himself and Dr. Vaughan,
said the witness. thar there were signs OF
cyanide shown fr treir test upon The
stomach. hut tary were unable to locate
definitely. ANY o. tins drug Dr. Halnes
said both himself and Dr Vaughan found
syausde in rhH cEpsgles which l'r. HYDE is
legged 10 have thrown away.
The stains on ne envelopes in which The
capsules were delivered TO him also
responded 10 the cyauides test. said the
witness Strychuine was found IN The
3ects OF Miss MsrEares Sv-upe by both him
self and Or Vaughan, said Dr. HRlnes-
Armed with scores of medical text books,
Attorney Prank r. walsh today resumed
1ts crpss-eKarni iuation az Dr. Ludwig Hex
toeu In The HYDE murder trial Progress
WAS slow and wrangles between attorneys
frequent A. result Judge BBtshaw an
Isounced he would hold night sessions Of
court Until the evidence is completed.
M- walsh attacked Dr. EsktoenE test
rnony In part with & teKt book which the
EatholuEist cnuahnrEted in writing
Among the things advised REAins1 by d.
i8eltosn in the book Hnd which were done
in the auiePsy on COLONEL swups were
I5ot water was used IN thawinE cut the
body.
The brain was tsker ont while frozen
hard.
The brain was severed at the base with
out the use Of q knife.
j was also shown thAt the brain was
cracked in the course Of removal
Dr. Hektoeu's book was urgent IN its
warning regarding thav-iuE OUT a body
with water. The law Of Germany pro
holitfnE such sctiou was CITED by The text
only The accidental severtnE Of the base
Of The brain prevented his using knife
said the witness.
The contents Of the bladder were thrown
AWAY. The text said traces Of srrychuine
we're readily fornd IN urine
on direct examination the witness said
nut one OF Chrsmsu swopss lungs was
c,ur-sted. To-day ne said both were az
fccted.
JudEe LatshGw today upheld Inc state 5
objection 90 the defeuses inquiry Of Dr-
Ludwig Hektocu II pr. hyde did not CAL
upon him on March = and demand parts
Of The visceras O. Colonel Thomas il and
ChrisrnRu SwUpe
No Request for Commission.
The defense did moi request 1he court
10 appoint q commission of medical eX-
perts TO examine The remaining parts Of
she viscsrAs Of .ae swopes.
scarcely had the session opened when
Attorney Walsh began an ATTACK on eN-
pert medical testimony with lr. Hektoen
IN the witness cnsit- Reading from text
book said 10 have been written by Drs,
yg-,-ltoen and WEEtr =. Haines. M, Walsh
y 80 The witness 2 his book oid not ad-
Y, ,tss. .xperts on both sides iu a trial 10 con
fer-S order 10 be able 10 Impress the cour.
and the jury, Ir. Hekroeu SAID be never
had read ms portion o. the text
Attorney Walsh C--nel The witness tuI
failing 20 confer with the dsfeuses s1len-
tists when The book said lnIs was ths
proper thing 10 DO.
Doesn't The book sag ihBt experts are
liable 10 be biased p" asked M Walsh
Il dout know thar II does II al de
pends on The expert AN how" replied Dr
Hektoen
NJ walsh then questioned with lns az
Of another book, said tu have been wit
ten an part rs pr Haines. regarding m
proper actions of an expert ON The stand d
order 20 make q good Impression with tn
court and 5ury- The court held that l'r
Hektoen 6id n,t nave 10 answer inquire
MADE 20 him In relation 20 the contents @
the book a. there was n0thiug % prov
le sAd anything 10 % with the writing o. d
Defense Refuses NiseerHs.
The question Of the yiscsrEs was REEI
brought up ty M walsh lie said b
wound be ahle 10 show the chemists u n
called uror IT. i9eklvor were authorized d
p~ Hvde tO act The state agreed
would uoi object 10 the witness being cues
rIurHf lhauJ tha request for the organs
ihis vss Gone
pr. HeNuen then admitted be had %
Msrca s refused tae yiscerss 90 the a,
cused pHysiclEus repgvseutauves
on March So said the witness. Atl1rne
tsin p. McGlerdy called upon him an
lR- HHines iu Chicago and asked for IN
Niscerss ana was refused Dr. Hektosn sal
that az that time be had no parts a. m
visceras The witness also admitted h
refused 90 ten the attorney anything abol
ths result O. his eKE uuatlon Of the organ
-IGtnt gou shortly before March O. u,
cslys from tho prosecuting attorney q
order 20 look Tor cyguidrg" asked N
walsh.
! DON'T know that did~ answered n
witness
..Abaut q month before tnls trial beEa
Y-u wrote te M. CoukluE that prospee
far Gueing cysni8t were looking good