The Lake County times. [volume] (Hammond, Ind.) 1906-1933, 1910-02-11

TOUR tz4J, Diock TOUR ~, O8k Fafk 40
dition to Tol1eston. the sum OF one and
$1,000 (s1.65) dollars; that the plain
tin il entitled to the foreclosure of said
lien against said lot and that the
equity of redemption of the defendants.
John S. Fisher and Fisher. his
wife. whose true christian name IL un-
known. as to said lot be foreclosed and
cut on; that the plaintiff il entitled
to a reasonable attorneys fee for the
foreclosure of said lien and that q rea-
sonable sum therefore 10 Ave dollars.
The court further finds that there il
now due the plaintiff from lot forty
(4o). block four ca, Oak Park addi-
tion to To1leston. the sum of eleven
and no-10o ($11.0o) dollars; that the
plaintiff Is entitled to the foreclosure
of said lien against said lot and that
the equity of redemption of the defend
ants, Jennie J. Roberts and - Rob-
erts, her husband, whose true christian
name is unknown, as to said lot be
foreclosed and cut of; that the plain
tiff is entitled to a reasonable attor-
ney's fee for the foreclosure of said lien
and that a reasonable sum therefore is
five dollars.
The court further finds that there is
now due the plaintiff from lot forty
eight (4s), block four ca, Oak Park
addition to ToIleston the sum of eleven
and no-1oo ($11 0o) dollars; that the
plaintiff Is entitled to the foreclosure
OF said lien against said lot and that
the equity of redemption of the defend
ants. John B. Carrier and Elizabeth
Carrier, as to said lot be foreclosed and
cut OFF; that the plaintiff is entitled
to a reasonable attorneys fee for the
| foreclosure of said lien and that a rea-
sonab1e sum therefore is five dollars.
| The court further finds that there is
now due the plaintiff from lot five (5),
block five co, Oak Park addition to
| Toleston, the sum of one and 65-1o0
| (s1.65) dollars; that the plaintiff is
| entitled to the foreclosure of said lien
! against said lot and that the equity of
redemption OF the defendants. Anna e.
Thomson and Thomson, her
| husband, whose true christian name Is
unknown. as to said lot be foreclosed
and cut of; that the plaintiff Is en-
titled to q reasonable attorneys fee
| for the foreclosure of said lien and that
a reasonable sum therefore Is FIVE dol
| lars.
| The court further finds that there is
now due the plaintiff from lot thirteen
| CID, block Ave 60, Oak Park addition
to Tolleston, the sum OF one and 65-100
4
/ titled to the foreclosure of said lien
against said lot and that the equity OF
redemption of the defendants, Lucy s.
Adams and - Adams. her husband
whose true christian name is unknown
as to said lot be foreclosed and cut off
that the plaintiff is entitled to a rea-
sonable attorneys fee for the foreclos-
ure of said lien and that a reasonable
| sum therefore is five dollars.
The court further finds that there Is
| now due the PLAINTIFF from lot seven
/ teen (17), block five (53), Oak Park
addition to Tolleston. the sum of one
and 65-100 ($1.65) dollars: that the
plaintiff is entitled to the foreclosure
of said lien against said lot and thai
the equity of redemption Of the de-
| PENDANTS, Eliza J. Copeland and -
Copeland her husband. whose true
| christian name is unknown, as to sait
lot be foreclosed and cut on. that thu
plaintiff is entitled to a reasonable at
torneys fee for the foreclosure of sale
| lien and that a reasonable sum there
fore Is five dollars.
The court further finds that there /!
now due the plaintiff from lot thirteer
| (13), block six (6). Oak Park addition
to Tolleston. the sum OF one and .65-10'
($1.e5) dollars; that the plaintiff is en-
titled to the foreclosure Of said lier
against said lot and that the equity o.
redemption of the defendants, Francis
Mariner, Esther e. Porter and Charles
c. Teare, as to said lot be forecloset
and cut on; that the plaintiff Is en-
titled to a reasonable attorneys fe'
for the foreclosure of said lien and tina
a reasonable sum therefore is five dol
lars.
The court further finds that there 4
now due the PLAINTIFF from lot twenty
four (24), block six (6). Oak Park ad
| dition to Tolleston. the sum of one AM
65-1Oo ($1.65) dollars; that the plain
; tin is entitled to the foreclosure o
! said lien against said lot and that tn
equity Of redemption Of the defendant
Clear Title Land Company, as to sal
lot be foreciosed and cut on; that tn
plaintiff is entitled to a reasonable at
torney's fee for the foreclosure of sal
lien and that a reasonable sum there
fore is five dollars.
The court further finds that there /
now due the plaintiff from lot twenty
Ave (25), block six CO., Oak Park ad
dition to Tolleston, the sum of eleve
and no-10o (s11.00) dollars: that tn
plaintiff is entitled to the foreclosur
of said lien against said lot and tina
the equity OF redemption OF the de
, PENDANTS. Mae Brade and Brads
y her husband whose true chris tia
: name Is unknown, as to said lot b
I forecIosed and cut off; that the plain
tiff is entitled to a reasonable attor
ney's fee for the foreclosure of sal
lien and that a reasonable sum there
fore is FIVE dollars.
The court further finds that there
uow due the plaintfff from lot twenty
six (26), block six (s), Oak Park ad
dition to Tol1eston. the sum of eleve
and no-100 ($11.0o) dollars; that tn
plaintiff is entitled to the foreclosur
of said lien against said lot and tina
the equity OF redepmtion of the defend
: ants. Mae Brade and - Brade, he
q husband. whose true christian name
unknown. as to said lot be foreclose
q and cut off; that the plaintiff is entit1e