The Washington herald., 1910-12-06
DAILY COURT RECORD
Monday
monday. December ), 1900


Supreme Court of the United States.
Present: Mr. Justice Harlan. Mr.. Justice White
Nh. Justice MeKenna. Mr.. Justice Holmes. Mr..
Justice Day Mr. Justice Lurton. and Mr.. Justice
Hughes.
Charles B. Connolly. Of Philadelphia. Pa I'd,
mund T. Drugs. Of New YORK City; Frank l. hul.
holland Of Toledo. Ohio: David J. keneneA, on
Pa; Edwin H. Caases. Of Chicago, H., and Arthur
d. Foster. Of Baltimore. Nd, we're admitted TO
practice.
No &c. Illinois Central Railroad Company, plain
tih in error vs.. The Commonwealth q hsntnek5
in error 10 the Court q Appeals II the state Of
Kentucky; Judgment affirmed with costs. opinion
by Mr. Justice Hughes
No SO. The United States. Tlsintin IN error IS.
FEitz Augustus Henze; IL error to the circuit
Court Of the United States fer the Southern dis
trici Of New YORK Judgment reversed and cause Ie-
manded for further proceedings in conformity with
the law. Opinion by AiT. Justice Mckenna.
No. 81. The United States plaintiff IN error. FS.
Fritz Augustus Henze IN 10 the Circuit Court
Of the United States ia the Southern district o.
Aeg York; judgment reversed and cause renAlded
fE further proceedings IN conformity with the law
/ Opinion b. Mr.. Justiee MeKenna
Nj. Justice Harlan annO,Ieed the following orders
Of the court
mo. 49, Ricardo Aguado. appellant. VS.. City oi
/ Manila; motion 20 advance granted and case as
signed for argument Monday. January 3 next.
With Nos So and s. as one case.
| No. $50. Fred Light. appellant vs. The United
| States motion TO advance granted and cause as
signed for argument on Monday January q next,
after the cases heretofore assigned for that day
No. I53. Christopher C. Wilson, plaintiff in error.
vs. The United States; and
Nos. 7se and 7ss. Christopher C. Wilson, appel
! liant. The United States; notion advance
granted and Gases assigned to be heard after Nos.
/ SIS and $50.
/ No. l3 Original. The State Of Oklahoma com
/ plaiaant, Ys. The Atellison Topeka and Santa Fe
Railway Company; and
No. H. Original The State II Oklahoma, com
I llainant. Is. The Atehison Topeka and Santa lie
Railway Company et al. sssgred for argument on
Monday January IS next. after the cases already as
signed for that day.
/ No. DO Stuart Lindsey. appellant. VS.. Natural
Csrbonie Gas Company CT al. petition e the New
York Carnonic Acid Gas Company Ct al for leave
TO file brief herein granted bat motion Of petition
ers 70 argue orally denied.
/ No. -. Original. TX psEte; In the matter Of tie
Mallory Steamship Company. petitioner; motion fol
leave to file petition for wit Of prohibition de
MED
No - Original TX parte: In the matter d
H. a Bradford. petitioner; motion for leave TO il'
petition for Writs q Prohibition and mandamus do
MED
No Original Ex parts: In the matter q
sobFinos de Ezquiaga petitioner motion for leave
to ale petition for wit Of Prohibition CT mandamu
! denied
No IA. John A. Ripper petitioner. rs. Tit
United States petition foF writ AZ esFtiorsri q
tie United states Circuit Court Of Appeals for tn
Eighth circuit denied
| No. 49, amanda C. Foster, petitioner, vs. La
! clAno T. soulo, execuiriK. &c. petition for WI
q oeTticrari 20 tie United States Circuit Court
Appeals for the Fifth circuit denied
| No. 7@. Frederick A HYDE et al. petitioners Us
The United States; petition for wit Of C5rtiorsT
70 the Court q Appeals q the District q Columbia
granted.
No. S. Original, TX pare: In the matter Q
Athanas Nicola. petitioneF. petition Ter writ o
mandanaus denied rule discharged and petition dis
81 ." '''''f'' o. i0''H ''i'i'n''' "a T. ;
No. Il. Original Ex-parte: In the matter o
TIE Cudahy Packing Company. petitioner; psti
ton Tor a wit q mandsmus denied rule dis
charged and petition dismissed. the suthoTit
q N r. Pennsylvania Company, petitioner, &c.
~ L. =. AL
No. g. Mary r. Trmbls ct al. plaintiffs il
eTrur IS Ida V kluEh et al: in err0r to tn
Circuit Cont Of the United states Tor the di'
tuct u South Canpua; dismissed for the want q
jurisdiction on authority Of Empire State. Idah
Mining and Developing Company Va Henley. 4
L. S. ~
No. 90 Philadelphia and Reading Railway Con
Tsny PLAINTIFF in error. vs. The United States:
I No Il Colorado and Northwestern Raroa
Company. plaintiff IN error, ys. The United states
and
No Isl. Southern Railway Company. plaintiff i
erTuT. rs. The United States: motion 70 advance {
Ia heard with No. s. submitted bY Mr.. Attorpe
| General Wickersham fT the United states
! No rs. The Standard OH Company 81 Ne
| YORK Petitioner. vs. The United States; petitio
for a writ a certioraFi 10 the United States CiTcui
Court q Appeals for the Second circuit subfnitte
| By Mr. d. J. keneick and Mr. Martin Carey n
the petitioner. and hy Mr. Attorney General Niei
| eTsham. Mr.. Assistant TO the Attorney GeneFz
Kenyon. Mr.. 5. Wallace Dempsey. and Mr. Burto
Corneau for the respondent.
No SOL Salvatore /. Rocca plaintiff IN eTo
rs. George r. Thompson; reassgned foF srgumeT
| on October I0S lell on motion az Mr.. EuStat
Cullinan In behalf Of counsel for the plaintiff
errof.
No 81. West Side Belt Railroad Company
al plaintiffs in ero-. Es Pittsburg ConstTuctio
Company: motion 10 dismiss o. affirm sahmitte
By Mr. samuel Mcclsg and Mr.. Edwin ". snit
| for the defendant in efroT IN support Of the nj
ton. and by Mr. Thomas Patterson for the plain
| tif In error IN opposition Thereto.
! No ~ The State of New jersey. Petitioner. u
Franklin Trust Company e al. petition Tor a VT
q oertiorsri to the United States CircIit Cou1
Appeals f0r the First circuit submitted BY Nj
Arthur Lord for the petitioner. and By Mr. WiIlial
r. Dunbar for the respondent.
No. SO, Roland F. Quiliin claimant, &c, pet
ticnsr, rs. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company =
tition for a wit II certioran 10 the United STATE
CeIit Court ~ Appeals for the Second circuit sul
mitted by Mr. II. L. Chsyney for the petitioner an
By Mr. Edmund L. Baylies for the respondent.
No. IS National Surety ComTeny. petitioner, VI
Kansas City Hydraulic Press Brick Company, fet
ton for s. WIT q cert rari 10 the United State
Circuit Court II Appeals FOR the Eighth circB
submitted By Mr.. Frank Hagennan for the pet
TONER and BY Mr.. James S. Botsford for the 7.
spoHdent.
No. rs. Clarence II. Venner plaintiff in eTTo
vs. The Chicago City Railway Company ct al. M
tons 20 dismiss CT affirm submitted BY Mr. John
Wilson for the defendant IN IN support Of III
motion and h3 Mr. Eliiah " Zoline for the plain
tif In erruT in opposition Thereto.
No. a. WinsloW Hart Reaves. second lieutenant
ARTILLERY Corps L. :. A. plaintiff IN error. "
Frederick .. Ainsworth major general &C. ct al.
argument concluded By Mr.. Assistant Attorney Ger
eral HsU for tbs defendants in error.
No. Il. Original TX psrte; In the matter @
Walter J. Gregory. petitioner: argued by Mr. job
Hall Jones and Mr.. ". Benton Crisp fer the peti
tiuner and By Air. Edward H. Thomas and Mr.
William Henry White for the respondent
Ne e. Chicago Burlington Quincy Railroa
Company Ct al, plaintiffs in error. vs. Charles /
-IctiuiFe; argument commenced hg Mr.. John ]
Herriek fer the plaintiff in error.
Adjourned until to-day a. i O'Clock
The day cali for Tuesday. December 6, viii be a
follows: Mes. g. g. c. g. s. land 3d. 70. Il lan
AS and 6l7l, $50 land 49,. 50s and 81.
sixty-four in every loO8OOo persons are blind.
/