The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1910-07-25
Haskins and Leverich Say
That Ne Sold Out
Hooking Pool.
THE Pepper FIRM ALSO SUED
Allegation That the Pool Manager
Violated Compact Not to
Deal for himself.

u'HsIN hhNNt hS eAA ~
= e., er,ch partners IN the defunct broker
g. firm OF IAthrop. Haskins a Co.
.r, SUNG James X Keene and the mem
TOYS Of the Stock Exchange firm VI
% pp-r 4 SternbaCh. keene's brokers.
fer GJH 49, They allege that Keene
..uI the brokerage firm Conspired To put
'tsrn uUf e business az the time Of the
lln.SInE coal and Iron slump last Janu-
rs, with loss in collateral, margins.
'uslness end good name aggr-gating
ne -1m demanded Any sum recovered
r, 'u 90 10 the satisfaction of CrsSlitors
The suit Is dis met from that already
Instituted by Henry u Hotchkiss, trustee
D. Bankruptcy for the members of lath-
r.p. Hsskins a Co, against James X
h..ur for ia" rr.o cry Of profits which
h. : alleged To- have made out of short
,a.-s at Hocking IA the falling mark etN
4 LAWYER Interested ia IN" case said
,"sIertay thai the ev idenc- upon which
go -.lit Is ha -'-i wac Cleaned IN the many
bearings conducted during IN. spring
','or. STANLEY " I'exter refer-e IN
Bankruptcy. save IA the single particular
- NIr HHsk ms own know ledge MIR
Hu-K ms viii have "a 81 : nee "a tell what
B.. SLOWS IN the course 81 the suit
N" summons and complaint IVES fled
u the County Clerk . Office On saturday
''"r the service Of TIA" papers IN the
.r'cuiants Besides MIR keens they
re Edward Pepper. Arthur " Popper
sidney " SteTnbgch end Joseph LoeNi.
'a-tners in the firm Of Pepper 4 Stern
sch. and Henry d Hotchkiss as trustee
.H bankruptcy OF Henry = HG IL ms.
Henry = Leverich and Fanni. q lathrop.
rernbers Of the firm of Iathrop. HesLS ins
q Go. Mr. HotChs les IL made defendant
t"cause Of his refusal tn hring suit in
ID. capacity Of trustee On the ground
% was the two active partners Who
.ra properly the plE intiffs. they and
'n' p. having "A complete and perfect
,ius" for action Hut MIR. Hotcliki-s's
I'-i'Iru - defendEn, IL wholly formal
l","rich and Hask ins were discharged
r r.nsrnpt"y last "Wednesday Abram
f.sys end william \ Mcclure are
'-~.r attorneys IN he damage suit nov
ir1ugtt
u- summons and complaint recites
" agreements forming the Hook ing
r..I + which Keen. was manager
ia Ii'fN hnfhhs INV M teilltflA
-, entered INTO az that time by the
s.rt.1s the defendants, J VI Fisl,c
Dn N"ub.rg"r. Henderson 4 Loeb
laN"'' Bros. Day. Adams A Go
''7r-n" \ Morrison. \ } Elias a Co
..,Ins \ 60. Post 4 Flagg end Orvis
.-. \ 60 that they should enter
..'n joint venture FOR the purchas.
- east % On shares If the common
81 - 4 oh aud
"a Iron Company or 81 much thereof a.
"' -ari JAMES II krene should deem
A.v'~aNI.
ras agreement. which wss to hold
~. september l. 1919. was renewed al
-.a.r I'm" PRIOR to itS expiration by the
lar.-- "Sc-pt post A FlaRg and Orvis
br's \ Co. who withdrew The biggest
r"-' '-.nihty under the agreement lay
...rrrop. Haskins a Co. who were
a IA. e DO shares. or at the rate 81
.u" - fur ~ such shares a. should be
'.4h k~.ne remained manager Of the
p. d interest in the pool was 3jno
s.tr--
' '.r.n-r declared IN the summons
rI mg,aut that -eparat" agree
j'f' "8- made about the middle of July. |
.r ug Leverich. Haskins Keens !
... hurh,ry \ 70. Atwood Violet |
'aL ~rhlIck A Co. Wagner, Dick |
'- Go Bishop. Laimbeer A CO |
VI Flsk" \ 60. This pool also was |
q H '.r ~ ~ shares Of Hooking stock. !
.' fhr"p, Haskins a Co. again had |
F--' -hsr. They stood Tor 100 |
r.. k""n" Was down for 100 and |
.--. Go were responsible for the |
~ According 10 both agree !
stated k-ene wasn't 10 deal
' D. -. Ok for his own account
.'. .. "l"r- u Is alleged. Keens set !
'.rt very thing with his brokers. |
. \ Nr-rIbaCh IL IN declared on !
..' md belief that they entered !
r-Iiracy To- depress and destroy !
.r.' s,ric" ~ said stock and To- ruin |
r. financially and To destroy |
SOD business and the good will |
and - render the plaintiffs in !
ani ~ longer able IN transact !
'-- H- stock brokers or "a enjoy I
ego, - the Stock Exchange
HN'diu' summaries Keenes !
,r-.' w.rd- That all Of the |
-a t.'- r." sad ks.,nc and Pepper A
a'u ''r" d'i" with the intent to .
.'i 'n~ la,n'lGs and TO injurr and .
.'.' NO" iisInrrs e the plaintiffs and .
o." ars" profit for themselves: !
.'' they were selling said stock in !
'nu. e laid nsUiracy the said 4
.t,'D ialely and frAudulcnily reprs- /
'rr plaintiffs that they did not .
''i"t ~" sellers or the cause for .
". stock whereas IN truth and ,
hey themselves were engaged in
-H|u stock
. 30 e oullat.ral tn. loss Of Mr.
Hi-- -"st - ia. exchange and the /
l.u - tl" firms business which /
G. lr o.. nt. II - declared - .
f wear are S.'t down a. amounting
81 90 J. 49, II S5J1VD
'autI'- agr,- that any Judgment
coed Hy them ~ result ~ the
.'bA 20 '. Henry -. Hotchhiaa. /
I.ster in bankruptcy. for the +,
No Il CREDITOR