Newark evening star and Newark advertiser. [volume] (Newark, N.J.) 1909-1916, 1910-03-22
ATTACK BY BEEF
TRUST ATTORNEY
R0USES GARvEN
Characterization of Prosecution
as "Clap=trap'' Causes OF
fetal to Push Fight.

=
oven moro d~etern,ined effort will be
.a h.. p.oaa. p;ar-a u Garven "a
M, .aI-s..e. - ~. ,na,c+Aa
push =.
peer trust of1iclais ana ioice - =
ductlon IN court OF books OF tne pachiils
companies is evident today, as the re-
suit of a hearing here yesterday in the
beef cases. Mr.. GarVen today mani
tested the resentment he feels against
Samuel Untermyer, of New York, VINO
appeared as attorney for the National
Packing Company, and went far out OF
his way 10 abuse the prosecutor M
score the Indictment of Packing COM
palry chiefs.
Mr.. Untermyer gave as the reason for
| not producing the defendants in this
state without a fight in the courts hat
the case has been most unfairly tried in
the wspaper that every step that
is taken or is about to be taken or
suggested to be taken is exploited in
the public press day after day and has
been since early in February; that a
regular press bureau has been main
tanned from the prosecutors office,
which is thought to be a perversion OF
justice and a travesty on justice.
He made these statements While be-
ing examined as a witness, and his as
sociates. Edwards, Louis
Hood Of Newark. and Richard V.
Iindaburv ~ Newark. did not appear
at all pleased with his utterances.
WHEN Sunremo Court Justice wayze
s,ared nm order directing that the min
u.s. M raeords ~ the indicted pack
~ oa,onanias ba brought within this
&c. r,,,e Was obtained from the
snnre,,e coprt 70 review for certiorari
ppra Suarza.s ae,ion and Il was in
Ia, t,is ,,,1o which is 70
he arg,od lafore the supreme Court in
- araarro, +ha+ tes+in,onv was
en- onno, 4ha aafense vere
nnNansn p,arra % Carren Assistant
pnoseaa,tor caorya r yickers ana for
mer Assistant Prosecutor Joseph M.
Noonan.s Supreme Court Examiner
Theodore L. Rurode took the t~estiihons.
1t appeared from the opening that
Mr.. Entermyer was ~endeaNorln@ 10
prove thai Kenneth *. McLareh, one
Of the directors of the National Pack-
ing Company, who escaped Indictment
had been used by Prosecutor Garven
in obtaining an indictment by lhe
grand Jury.
WAS it this proceeding CHR. McLar-
ems production of books before tile
Grand jury that resulted in the lndlct-
ment of the defendants" asked Mr.. Un-
termyer Of Prosecutor Garven, who had
been sworn as q witness.
II refuse to testify" was the answer.
"Why?'' 81
Because 1t would be a violation OF
my oath as prosecutor to reveal pro-
~ceedings before the Grand Jury was
the reply.
Were you before the Grand Jury the
day the Indictment was ound asked
Mr.. ,Untermyer.
II decline to answer"
A long list of questions brought sim
liar refusals to testify as to proceed
ings before the grand jury.
- :. ur,tbx
.,, ~. +ha, su,or, Mr.
vi. o -
tNoolIah a. annrson+ :, tbase
"hoii % -, naISod
pioIeeul rationo, pacl,;ny
Up nart;o,ior oosa anJ
N~olhpanS ~
Potners III olne sel .u ,r
WY 40 you ioi'eo " s"s W
pooks .o ridge
FOR reasons s'a'eu oeo '
80
10 you thinN ~ pnnS4s -
these ooohs woelu 49,. ~ 49,
clients? if.you aon thilk .ne oo ~hr
would De injurious ~ ~
don you produce lhei.
because we are RESINS on y
rights; because we tiiiih ehis pioceeu-
ing an outrage on THESE seh.iei'
that 1t is for the purpose Oh sa.lslSi iis
public eiamor Withou' a Neslisc u
right or justice ana thaeie 10 oei
but mere claptrap, we are soihs -
fight that sort OF proceeding - .he
end
'But not oy producing ahs VI
PENDANTS physlcally III TINS p'oceeuni
II you can heip Ha
There is no trouble ABOUT ieipins II II
The only reason why the ueieiiauii's u
not come into tnls jurisoicllon 10 Lid
} this case mas Deeh most unfairly ire
in the newspapers; mat every step ina
is taken, or IS about 10 De takcii, OF sus
since early III February; that a regula
PISS 80