The San Francisco call., 1910-11-04

line and how he placed himself on one
side and how on the other side he
placed the twin iniquities. the TWO bale
fuL corrupt, malignant influences Of the
slater And he said with eloGueace
with denunciation. with vehemence
with more vehemence than he uses to-
day in this campaign. that he would
ia Ike his chances on one side OF the line
with William F. Herrin and Villa m
Randolph Hearst on the other side
That was his position four years ego.
WHERE Is HE NOwF
To-day where is he? Has he hopped
over the line 70 them or have .hey
era wled over the line to himf ou
realize do YOU not. that those two jour
nails are gned-that miserable sheet
~ Calhoun and Ruef. called the Even
Ing Post. and the paper Of Hearst, cal ed
the san Francisco Examiner NOW
propose TO read TO you few OF me
eloquent statements made by the demo
cratic candidate for governor about
William Randolph Hearst four years
ago
They ask me why J drew a line az
the democratic convention and placeo
myself on one side and Hearst on the
other and 7 answer fl is because Hearst
is traitor. Don't you think that the
democratic party owes II 10 Itself TO
drive this man from its midst? Now ne
IS gone and what becomes Of him in the
Empire state we viii leave 20 the good
people Of New York 10 decide, but
never = sgsin can ". r. Hearst cross the
threshold Of the Democratic party in
DO YOU think so now, Mr.. Demo-
cratic candidate II YOU are so fond
Of answering questions, answer tnat ;
II he has not crossed the threshold Of
the democratic partv in ca llfornia the
democratic candidate has crossed the
threshold Of William Randolph Hearst
STAND Is EVIDENT
AT Pasadena. October 20 1905, the
democratic candidate said:
when 7 accepted the nomination OF
the democratic party ] did do so on one
condition That was that should be
e ilOWed 10 draw a line and put on the
liam Randolph Hearst and ke the
other side myself l VIII take my
chances on the other side. II would
give me a nightmare if single inc Of
praise Of me or my candidacy should
appear in the Examiner"
Brave words are these, are they not2
The query this year is: Has any man
permitted himself by the lure of off1ce
10 be tempted from the straight path
~ eliminating special interests, the
Southern Pacific and ". r. Herrln from
this government That IS the query
Is any man In this campaign reachlng
ont for votes and sWerVing from the
liue2 That is the problem you can
determine IL from the utteranceS OF
this iStinguished gentleman four years
In his speech at Hanford September
s the candidate of the democratic
party said.
"Herrin may control republican con-
Ventions and Hearst may be nominated
iu Buffalo. but tell YOU the time viii
come here in California when William
b. Herriu and william Randolph
Hearst shall 60 down TO eternal per
dition.
RE is right But they are going
down this year with another man TO
eternal perdiIion. At Vallejo Septem-
ber % 906 he said.
II would rather go down to ever
lasting defeat without Hearst or Her
rim than go 10 victory with either or
both Of them
Remember that language Of four
Years 20. Well. this year he is going
down 70 everlasting defeat with both
Of them CHEERS In the same speech
The candidate said:
-Tf I can't win without the sandbag
and the sack I viii retire from polit-
ical life and take my conscience with
me-
HE WILL GET WISH
And I wish him nothing worse than
that ON the Sth Of November. when he
VIII take his conscience with him into
retirement from the political life of
California.
TODAY the alignment Is made. Every
single influence that YOU have known
in the past as evil in this state is on
the one side OF that line. There is the