Newark evening star and Newark advertiser. [volume] (Newark, N.J.) 1909-1916, 1910-01-29
COURT TO HEAR
CHARGES MADE
Y AGAINST DR. DILL.
Justice Gummere Grants Writ of
CertiOrari to Review
the Case.
lf"T00 INDEFINITE" IS HIS
REPLY TO ACCUSATIONS
lConstifutionaIity of Law Is Basis
on Which Judqes Will
i. -, 10 Interfere. 3
-A 49, AaH go

aaa.oey MY iSiN.
5ai.. ,..s-.----
49,, ssls,s.s,,s ..0-tf.k
tn1ef Jusllce Hulhihere touay saanteo
witt OF cerHordff pine y ny
w. tNlker' coullsei lr ~.
: Dill covering Inc. we've hiaue
y by the committee with resaIu 10 lne
.9alieseq hllslhshaGeHaent .ot 2tne couney
~ ms MAS aloNeo oh '"o
j srr2qnnq5 ma there was s9ple ooupt 40
iokhoy Wltllner me LesIs!9t ihteiueu ~
zaaaulp inc hoaFo ol : Feslo'deis u ~
3.itsht 70 Try suporulAate onioeis' ~
supervisor uraer lne att ., i'uV' Sle'
} LIN l!lat ;ehce,s y pld3uc ny '"'7o !"
9tSaInP aott1 d3,sa ~ "a ~ bosnitaIs
af a. paard Of Eraahoidars which
n,ada 10 ancnsatiors vas renresented
y ~, Count Co,nsal Ioeenb 7. Mum.
z Nh pilYo, IL, onaning his rotment.
- - roasinr ,.afaronco IN the
,t.aai, on ~ constI+r+ionaIitv of the
80 ,'hioh aroata, ,ro oeico If sinner
80 a. aa,,n4,, nhich forme ms rf
60 ~ II - uha ann1icat;on
m. 49, aharaas = irdo6nite
y - a.. .ot farth -, M p;lor WIN
- 40 1uuo1t an o,cn
49,. r. aaia tha+ ohargo No I
- irdaanito haao,,sa ~ MI 81 NOT
"as -
.p,u VIA snn ,nhinh
80 ~ - lii NJ . NC IN
sa nc - respois'o,e' "nne w ""s
iifneh"i.e' as " uoe9 ~ - 80
nies ne vas euppoeeu y
~ osponsiole ioi, :" "nete ny "a
z su''eu' Whne an ~ oiaise ~. :, ~
vas nhuehin'e' a. II aeouseu
49, ia"u'c " nfane " PiopSi
.gaeeion as 10 tie FAUST Vi u nee, -
tbtans W s'a'e any ue 'neh.ns y n".
uuts 70 ieport' II was auh't.eu ~
h'' '.iher Ina. II was his8cient uu's
-aio ihahe ~ l~hVest'sa.ion' anu ne auueu
. tlae inns ~ eAdcti9 Whdt was uohe'
~ Attendants Not Named.
Charge No. 4 is likewise indefinite,
he said, in that it fails to state the
names of tho attendants, the time of
their absences and the alleged in
stances of intoxication, and fails to
2 show thai the instances referred to
We're brought to DR.. Dilrs attention.
1t was also alleged that charge No. 6
was indefinite in that lit does not state
Ii what attendants have been derelict in
1.-the performance of their duty: when
they were derelict, at which hospital
they were SO derelict, and does not
.-SDtClIE the fuft OF Sldtulc uIlutI WiliCil
. authority is given to the sup~erintend-
: ent of the hospital to discharge at
2
Z Z ihat charSe NJ 0 - diso hlueiliii.e
was sel lor.n III mat IL aoes no s.a'e
at wiheh asylum propei n'e uriiS naVe
Jiol Deer hau anu Wheh 'heS nave peeu
i'au, WHAT Instructions nave peeil eisen
2 NY 'he committee ana wien anu Mn"'
rule or DN-laW mas Deel N1OlHIBu.
a hke plea was returheo against
charge NO q u peihg sated that TINS
was indefinite In that Ut rails TO snow
,a what patients could pc ehlpioyed WIN
advantage 10 themselves and 70 she
"a lnstitution VINO were nat SO 50 hpiosea
does not SNOW what tiibSJSfp'ihuteiioa7
ton OF the committee was, ana "heh
II was given n ialls 70 snow what
3 rule or bylaw there is requiring tue
superintendent to observe recomlnenda-
), tons OF either the coplniltlee or boaro
of Freeholders, not entBodleh IN "a ride
or bylaw of the Boardof Chosen Free
a1solders, and does not Show any statute
which would enable the superintendent
to employ the inmates of the asylum
lin the performance OF work at the
asylum, and does not show n au-
" thority in the board or in the commit
~ Ice ny S'atutS VI otiei "iSe, W uN-
tate TO the superintendent the treat
e ment TO be given to patients
IS Regulation Not Cited.
& Charge s. it is stated. is indefinite,
because IT fails TO refer to any rule or
fsrepi,latieu With respect to the issuing
81 oeE nasses and. does not. show in what
fes meet cthe, issuance of masses has not
s been ga feeltardeds and at which hos
ispital while charge No. o Is declared to
be indefinite. because it failed to give
of the. rules and discipline of the in