Anadarko daily democrat. [volume] (Anadarko, Oklahoma) 1908-191?, 1910-10-18
MAX GOLDMANS
HISTORY
In The Karl Preger
Estate

/ W set hslue lHe OFutF TeNOhlHB Hls
letters testamentary and on the 2Sth
day of April, after Mr. Goldman had
introduced all the evidence he had
and was accorded a full hearing, the
Court was compelled to deny his
motion.
In the County Court Of Caddo County
Oklahoma.
In the matter of the estate of Karl
Preger, deceased. Journal ENTITY.
Now on this 2Sth day of April. 49,.
10. this matter coming on for further
hearing and determination, counsel
having argued the cause AMI cause
being now finally submitted to the
Court for his det- rmination and the
Court having fully an carefully con.
sidering the law presented in the
cause is of the opinion that sail mo-
tion ahould be denied for the reason
that the Court is without discretion
in the matter and the motion is by
the Court denied and go ordered. To
which ruling of the Court and each
of them the executor, Max Goldman,
excepts and exceptions are by the
Court allowed.
('EAL) F HOLDING,
Judge.
From this order of the Court Mr.
Goldman appealed to the District
Court and was there accorded a full
and complete hearing, and after hear.
ing all the evidence, and the law as
presented by Mr. Goldman's attorneys
and by myself. the Cour, rendered
judgment affirming, in all respects,
the judgment of Judge Holding
which Judgment is as follows:
In the District Court,o the Fifteenth
judicial District of Oklahoma Sitting
Within and for Caddo County.
In the Matter of the Estate of Karl
Preger Deceased. Journal Entry.
Now on this the Goth day of May
1910, this cause comes on in its regu
lar order for final judgment, aid tie
Court having duly considered the evil
dence and being fully advised in the
premises, finds that the judgment OF
the County Court of Caddo County,
Oklahoma, made aud entered on the
18th day Of April, 1910, in this cause,
revoking and setting aside the letter,
testamsntary of the appellant. Mas
Goldman, should be affirmed.
1t Is Therefore Ordered, Consider
ed and Adjudged by The Court that
the said Judgment OF the County
Court revoking the letters testamen
tary of the said Max Goldman, be anc
the same is hereby affirmed. at the
costs of the appellant, Max Goldman,
FRANK NJ. BAILEY, Judge
To the foregoing judgment. the
said Max Goldman at the time except.
ed and his exceptions are allowed.
FRANK NJ. BAILEY, Judge.
Mr. Goldman did not appeal IRON
this judgment. and 1t is therefore
final.
Now. let's reason just a little.
If Judge Holding was wrong. and il
the District Court was wrong. why
did not Mr. Goldman appeal to the
Supreme Court? Had his counsel
had the least hope' of reversing the
District Court, they would have ap.
pealed, and failing to do so, it is
practically an admission that the
County Court and District Court
were right in ousting him from off e
1t seems to me that it would have
been much better If Mr. Goldman had
taken his case to the Supreme Court
and there have his rights determined
upon the actual facts as they wore
developed from his own evidence, in.
stead of going II his friends and
causing them to pass judgment upon
his mere statements. which are utter.
ly inconsistent with the facts as they
appear on record and as they actually
exist.
Mr. Goldman. not having appealed
from the judgment of the District
Court, ceased to be executor of Kari
Preger's estate and this being the case