The Washington herald., 1910-10-05
DAILY COURT RECORD.
cTuesday, October 4, 1900
DISTRICT COURTS.

Present-An.
Admissions Herman T. Wentz H. B. Ridgay,
William L. Brown, John T. Money. George Z.
Kummel. Joseph l. Weller WllfIsd c. Lane Rice
Hooe, John G. Gadfeter. J. A. Annis, D. Faber'
William A. Wallace James Hlndiay, Carl Behr-
mann Conger X. Smith. Richard z, Babcock,
Amaca NJ. Holcomhe. Edward G. Wilmer. Louis b.
lie Due. Linton Sattlethwaits. and o. c. Gibbs
No. Z37. Brynes ct al. CeHigiio; dooketed
and dismissed. Attorneys. Tucker. Kenyon Mac
faFland
No. 2l7O Mitchell Mining Company vs.. Enig ct
al appearance II 6. f. Sullivan for appellant
withdrawn By leave of cosirt. Attorneys. samuel
Watson and G. E. sulliEan--C. Z. Emg and John
Ridout
No Zs2 ami Ass Jasselli vs.. Riegs National
Bank; passed Attorneys, j H. Ralston and II. w.
Wheatley-R. r. Perry Son
No Zs5 United States ex rel Rice vs.. Moore
continued. Attorney. NJ stnsburger-W. s Rack
man.
No 2lss Metzses vs.. Kelly ct al; order making
new parties appellee Attorney Y. II. Wallace
Z. II. Thomas and W. II. White.
No 29s. johnson County Savings Bank rs. Men
dell ct al: placed al foot q calendar Attorneys.
T. L. Jeifords and W. II. White.
No, 2lso. Waterbury Chemical Company vs..
United States; continued. Attorneys. r. 7. Gatle5
&C. r. Watson and s. C. Peelle.
Original No. 80. Hayes VS.. Conger; petition FOX
allowance Of special appeal denied Attorney, l. H.
David.
No. ms Metzger vs. Nlstzger motion for re-
hearing overaled. NAttorneys V. II. Wallace. Percy
Mezer-H. b. aioulton and ". W MILAN
No. 20. Billings rs. Field; each side allowed one
hour additional 20 argue case. Order amending
section ule 8. and limiting time for argument 70
one hour for each side.
Patent appeal elli Healey vs. InwOod e. al con
tinued.
Patent G5 Curtis vs. Ludmark suggestion q
dimnuton q record ard PETITION for ccg1iaau sub
mitted by Alr Frank Brisser on behalf q appellee
In support - petition and b. Mr.. L. 5. Bacon IN
opposition thereto.
Patent appeal go. In re application q Safety
Remedy Company. motion for rsaear1ng oTer1ued.
Patent appeal s45. Whitman s. King; affirmed
opinion b. Mr. Justice Robb.
No. ZI3A. United States ex u. knight vs.. Sec
retaTy Il Interior: affirmed opinion by Sir Justice
Anderson Attorneys. Brandenburg BTandenburg
-LaWler Clements. and Wright
No. 2lf2 Commissioners Of District q Columbia
Peters; affirmed opinion by Mr. Justice sander
san. Attorneys, Thomas Stephens-J. W. Pat
tefs1n
Assignments for to-day:
Special calendar:
| No. 2 United States er rel Phillips vs.. Balm
/ ger Attorneys. Tucker. Kenyon 4 MacfsIlana-
/ Lawler. Clements & Wright
No 3 Fnsby ". United States. Attorneys. II.
/ T. DaVk-Wils0n & Adkins
No. a. United States * rel. Early vs. Richards.
/ Attorneys. Flynn-ThOmss q White.
| No. ). Mitchell Mining Company -. Emig. At
torney. Sullivan.
No. 6. Hopper vs.. Bell. Attorneys McMahon 4
/ Mc9lahon and Kdout.
No. {. United States e1 rel. lowe Is. Baliingar.
Attorneys. Happier & Asniiat-Lawler. Clements 4
/ Wright
! No. 3 Wall vs.. Oyster. Attorneys. Ridout-
Peelle.
! No, 10. Brown vs.. United States. Attorneys. Car
| rington Ri85at-Wus0n.
| Nc. H. Billings vs.. Field. Attorneys Bacon
/ Church & johnson.
| No. z Moses & sons vs. HAYES. Attorneys-Bal
| linger-Dayid Behrend