Omaha daily bee., 1910-03-14
Nebraska

competed, ana which make OF the Llndell
one Of the real hotels OF the state.
The changes In the structure have been
so many on on such a large scale that the
patrons OF the old Lindel will not recog-
nibe their Old haunts. II Is nov possible
to stand in any hall in the building and
see daylight at the other end, for every
hall has been Strengthened ana every han
leads to daylight. The lobby on the ground
floor has been almost doubled In size ana
changed completely, Steve Hoover's well
known Indian. even. having been painted
out.
Mr.. vonsble has fixed up a private office
which gives him a view through windows
OF the Kitchen and the dining room at all
times.
Normal site at lohadron.
The State Normal board will meet at
Chadron, April 4. at which time the site
for the new Normal school will be selected.
George A. B%erlinghof has prepared an OUT
line Of the plans for the new building and
It Is possible by the time the board meets
he will have the plans all ready for their
adoption.
Call of Supreme COart.
Following is a list Of cases which will be
called for hearing at the session Of the
supreme court, commencing Monday.
March s21, 1910:
For Hearing Monday. March 21-Hinckley
against Jewett, Lancaster county Occiden-
McGrew. Lancaster; Holyoke (executor)
against Bishop, Lancaster; Kovarik against
Saline County, Saline.
For Hearing Tuesday, March 22-Patter-
son against Mikkelson, Seward county;
Taylor against Stull, Cass; Clark against
tleischman, Cas-; against State,
For Hearing Wednesday, March 2s-Prusa
against Everitt. Colfax county: Arterburn
against Beard, Chase; Brown against BUCK
ley, Custer; Palmer against Loyal Mystic
Legion OF America. Adams; state ex rel
Mcdonald against Harrington, Dawes.
For Hearing Thursday, March 24-Backes
against Madsen. Greeley county; Wood
administrator against City OF Omaha,
Douglas; State against Union Pacific Rail-
way Company, original: Kavan against
City Of South Omaha. Douglas; Dennison
against Daily News Publishing Company,
For Hearing Friday. March 25-winder
against Winder, Madison county; S,ate ex
re- Hansen against Carrieo' kearn@yi Cess
State, York.
Proposed Call of Supreme Court.
The following is a proposed assignment
of cases for hearing at the session com
menclng Monday, April 4, 1910:
DbCSlih Abdlhbl GOOSluk NOn mOllOn LOT
rehearing), Washington county; Hitchcock
County against Cole, Hitchcock; Mosher
against Huwaldt, Cedar; Waters against
City of Omaha, Douglas; Helebrant against
Helebrant, Box Butte; Jones against Es-
tate Of Schuck. Clay; Brym against County
Of Butler, Butler; ]. p. I,cininger Lumber
Company against Dewey, Platte; Glantz
against Chicago, Burlington y Quincy
Railway Company, Lancaster; Cox against
Chicago & Northwestern Railway Conn
Pierce; State ex rel Cattern AGAINST
Board OF County Supervisors, Dodge; Mcese
against Nixon, Nemaha; Weller sEainst
Fischer, Otoe; Faist against Dahl. Cclfax;
Trinidad Asphalt Manufacturing Company
against Buckstaff BroA' Manufacturing
Company, Lancaster; County of Lancaster
against Fitzgerald. Lancaster; Shnckiey
against Homer. Douglas; Jhlich against
Chicago, Burlington Il q WnGy Railway
Company, Lancaster; UpdiSe against CitE
Of Omaha, Douglas; Westman against
Saunders; Westman against Carl
son, Saunders: MCNAMARA against Nc
Namara, Dakota, Blackburn against
Moores, Douglas; Riseman against Hayden
Brothers, Douglas; State against Mccoy,
Franklin; Purdy against state, Red Willow.