The Appeal. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn. ;) 1889-19??, 1910-07-09

ing proceeding and while it is d1gnlned II str1Kes
some people also as being awfully funny.
Every Monday, as soon as court assemblies. II
is the custom to read decisions on cases WHICH,
have been considered and on WHICH tne court
is to pass judgment. If the decision OF great
case is expected the courtroom always Is crowded
and the members of the bar, newspaper men ana
others who have been present be1ore on ike
occasions, look anxously to see which judge IS
to read the important decision. IT any one OF
three four justices is to read 1t there Is dis
tinct of disappointment, because nobody
except the reading judge is likely to hear the
decision. In other words, some of the judges OF
the supreme court have such weak voices that
not even the men closest to them can catch what
they say and everybody must wait until the deci-
sion can be read before knowing what it means.
This inability perhaps lack of desire on the
part of some OF the justices to read out loud, is
great trial to the newspaper correspondents who
are anxious to telegraph the news Of the decision
at the earliest moment possible. There are other
troubles which beset the correspondents as well
as those which come from the poor enuncation
and the weak voices of some of the justices.
Legal language is the hardest kind of language
for the layman to understand, and the result is
that when the decision Is read the first part of
occasionally makes it seem certain that one side
has won the case, while the tail end of the deci-
sion may reverse everything and give the case
to the other side
There striking instance of this in a
great case which was decided three years ago.
The city of Chicago trying to effect changes
in its street-car system. The street-car compa-
mics held that their franchise was good for 100
years and that the city could not GUST them from
any of their privileges under their franchise The
case went to the Supreme court and was of tre-
mendous interest to all the cities in the United
States. Moreover, the speculative interests of
the country were awaiting the decision with the
keenest anxiety and interest, for if it went one
way 1t meant that certain stocks still would be
of great value, and If 1t went the other way it
means that they would be worth little.
The decision read in the Supreme court
by a judge who had good voice. Everybody
had made up his mind that If the Supreme court
decided that the railroad companies had hun
dred years franchise they had won the case and
that the city had lost. This was regarded as the
crucial feature of the W hole controversy.
The newspaper correspondents from the great
cities were in attendance at the court when the
decision was read and they were ready to
dispatch messengers instantly to the telegraph
Office with a brief dispatch saying either "The
companies win," S"The city wins" This was
all that was to be sent out at the first instance,
for the situation was understood in every news
paper Office In the country, and single tip as to
which side won would be sufficient to release
long stories Of the railroad controversy and other
stories already written Of what the victory meant