The Bridgeport evening farmer., 1910-04-08

GO W1IG or 11OCdl FlUmOGf
 Four Marriages An
 nuled
 1 Judge Howard J. Curtis in the Su- perior court today granted decrees in l four divorce actions heard by him. 1 Three women were released from fur 1 ther servitude as he1pmeets of men l they married. One lone man was re- 1 stored to all Of the privileges he en- l joyed before he entered the life of | bondage. One woman is alleged to | have wrecked three homes.
 | Forestina Pike Kinder was freed 1 from Frederick w. Kinder, who for merly conducted a plumbing establish nent in Myrtle avenue near Railroad I avenue, on the ground of inf1delity,
 Emma Hudson being named as core
 spondent Less than year ago Sid
 Emma, the correspondent in this suit,
 on the same ground, Kinder being
 Kinder told the court that she was | married Feb. 21, 1895. and has lived in this city since that time. About three years ago she heard ruInors about her | husband chasing around after the 1 Hudson woman, who was a. netghbor. She accused her husband of infidelity, Fred H. Nichols of 575 Fairfield ave
 
 he lived with his wife at the above address in Fairfield avenue. They had a rooner in the home Emma Hudson whom he knew was separated from her husband. On the morning of Feb. 21 he arose about o'clock to go to his work. that of sexton at Trin- kitchen he noticed the door of Mrs. Hudson's room was slightly opened He peered into the &m room &m and saw Kin once to his own room and argued in effectual1y with his wife about having Mrs. Hudson in the house.
 As a result of that quarrel. MT. Nichols stated today that he left his home the next day and has not lived yaed Tlh his aftar Tafe Was from the Hudson woman's bed room l with his clothes on his arms down the back stairs, which were covered with snow, as it had storrned during the evening. Kinder dressed at the bot | tom of the stairs under the veranda brought out at the Hudson Hudson | trial. Thus it appears that Emma ing up of three homes.
 MONAHAN vs. MoNAHAN.
 ' Pretty Harriet M. Monahan of Frank street. and Edward F. Monahan of took each other for better or worse on March 23, 1903, but it for the worst, as they lived together for less
 Just after the marriage. the two went to live with the groom's mother. bile Co.,, and told his little wife that he was going out of town, probably to Philadelphia, to dig up a new job, he would send for her to come and live with him. She soon learned that hubby did. not go out of town: but woman of i'll repute. Then it dawned upon her that her husband was de- becoming a burden to her mother-in- law: She left that donicile and has lived with her own mother since. To the best of her knowledge, Mrs. Mon ahan stated that her husband did not leave town for some time. She heard he was about town. and had tried to success as she could not locate him. When the divorce proceedings were started some few months ago, Mona hans residence was given as 'of parts He somehow other heard of the action and wrote to his wife from New York. The letter said Please let me know of the divorce, Pm not of parts unknown. E. B. l
 Mrs. Monahan has supported her self and child since her husband de- serted her by working in local factor les At present she is employed at the G. c. Bathceler Go.
 HILLIKER vS. HILLKER.
 Jenn1e A. d1ll1ker, so her nuSOaId, Eugene F. Hilliker, says. left Derby ] on May 3. 1900 without telling any body about it, and has not been seen since. She was heard from indirect y a couple of years ago, when Hilliker ' teceived a. letter from an attorney in Seattle Washington. who stated that Mrs. Hil1iker desired a, divorce, and T wanted her husband to agree to it that | ne was cruel to her. Hiliker stated hat he never was cruel to his wife in ais life. that he always provided a good home for her. While her hus- oand was working in the department ] Mrs. HiI1iker used to receive mail from ( different men, four of which letters i Ter husband found in her trunk before ' she left. One of them was from a ( Ter to wait a few months before they V vent West together. Mrs. HiIIiker z lad her mail addressed to Jennie A. q Sparks at the Shelton post office. The V court allowed the decree.
 BALDWIN VS. BALDWIN. The good old booze got the best of Edward B. Baldwin of Shelton and oday his wife: Alice M: BibeIow Bald vim, was freed from him. This case vas heard last week before the court ,ut was continued as there was not ufficient evidence to show that the a defendant Baldwin was habitually in t emperate. Last week the witnesses v tated that Baldwin lost many a job I trough being intoxicated, and that a while in that state he was very ugly, t eishbor of Mrs Baldwin recited the fl anne testimony. only a little worse. b This neighbor, Mrs. Mary Cohan has il ften seen Baldwin since his wife left d ober. She talked to him a few weeks S go about the divorce. He answered, That's nothing, I've got another girl c n Ansonia, this time I'm going to -a1~1~xv fr11Dv NT Trey iOn