The Falls City tribune., 1910-09-16

10 the defense OF those In present con-
troll of the Republican party In New
York state, whom IL has affected to
oppose In the past, the Evening Post
through whatever editor personally
wrote the article, pactised every
known form OF ~mendacfty.
Probably the Evening Post regards
the decalogue az outworn; but If it
will turn to II and read the eighth and
ninth commandments. It will W that
bearing false witness is cons smned
as strongly as theft itself. To take but
one instance out Of the many In this
article, the Evening Post says: ut
was Roosevelt who asked Hartman to
come to the White House secretly.
who took his money to buy votes In
New York. and who afterwards wrote
to My Dear Sherman'-yes, the same
Sherman-reviling the capitalist TO
whom be had previously written, say
Ing; You and | are practical men"
Not only is every important statement
In this sentence false, but the writer
who wrote It knew 1t was false. AS
far as ! was concerned, every man
visited the White House openly, and
Mr.. Hartman among the others. l
took no money from Mr.. Hartman Sc
cretly or openly to buy votes or for
any other purpose. Whoever wrote
the article In the Evening Post in
question knew that this was the foul.
est and basest lie when he wrote the
sentence, for he quotes the same let
ter In which | had written to Mr.. Har-
riman as follows: What l have to
say to you can be said to you as we'll
after election as before. but | would
like to see you some time before |
write my message" ! am quoting
without the letter before me, but the
quotation is substantially, II not yer.
bally. accurate. That statement in
this letter to Hartman is OF course
on its face absolutely incompatible
with any thought that I was asking
him for campaign funds, for II is o
course out of the question that I could
tell him equally well what / had to
say after election II it referred in any
possible way TO getting money before
election. This is so clear hat any
p%retense of Misunderstanding is proof
positive of the basest dishonesty In
whoever wrote the article in question.
AS a matter OF fact, when Mr.. Harri-
man called II was to complain that the
national committee would not turn
oyer for the use of the state cam
paien in which he was interested
funds to run that campaign, and to
ask me to tell Cortelyou to give him
aid for the state campaign. Mr.. Cor
telyou is familiar with the facts. In
other words. the statement of the Eve
ming Post is not only false and mali
cious. is not only in direct contradic-
ton of the facts. but is such that IL
could only have been made by a man
who, knowing the facts. deliberately
intended to peryert them, Such an
act stands on a level of tnfamy with
the worst act ever performed by n
| corrupt member of the legislature or
city Official. and stamps the writer
with the same moral brand that
stamps the bribe-taker.
| have seen only a telegraphic alb.
stract of the article, apparently con
tanning quotations from 1t, Practical,
ly every statement made in these
quotations is a falsehood.
To but one more shall allude. The
article speaks of my having attacked
corporations. and. referring directly to
my Ohio speeches, of my having
Sought to infame the mob and make
mischief" In those speeches the
prime stand | took was against mob
violence az shown by the labor people
who are engaged in controversy with
a corporation. My statement was In
effect that the first duty Of the state
and the first duty of the officials was
10 put down disorder and to put down
mob violence, and that after such
action had been taken, then 1t was the
duty of officials to Investigate the cor
poration, and If Ii had done wrong &c
make it pay the penalty of its wrongs
and to provide against the wrongdo
ing in the future. II Is but anothei
instance of the peculiar baseness, the
peculiar moral o%bliquity, of the Eve
ming Post that it should peryert the
truth in SO shameless a fashion.
THEODORE ROOSEVELT.
Cheyenne, Wyo, August q, 1910.