The Detroit times. [volume] (Detroit, Mich.) 1903-1920, 1910-10-05

V1kn - o9~so - Ax.z. y: ~.
n boohs 11sol6oes that they have No per,
eqoat pcoDerty 70 sxcesd the va1ue q
e2oo Ana such being the cass W recon-;
mend q ~ AZ al, :. sssessmsns % rsasos'
| Re pctifion 81 Adam Brandu. We fnd
that q personal asscssment or 11,byl
ssS ssn; d him aS sSs y sosrd az
Assessors: that In making out said state.
ment. petitioner included therein cash
In hank" $500 instead OF 5000 AND
error was made recommend that said as
ssssment be reduced from $3.50 to ~
Re petition of Michigan Lumber Yard
1--WE nnd that, a personal assessment Of
$4,000 was levied against said petit
itioner for 1910 through failure on their
part to ME q statement Min inc Nv
law. which Is accounted for by the
fact that petitioners representative
was out OF the city At the time tho
tion OF the books by the Assessors
prompts your Committee 10 recommeno
that said assessment be reduced from
Re petition OF Ralph Amesworth. we
md that a personal assessment or Ssvo
was levied against Grace L. Ameswortn
Assessors; that In making out said
statement she included therein house
hold goods to the value OF $500. which
Is sxemp. under the, the LAW AVA s We n
be reduced from 5000 to eAoo.
Re petition Of Aiva hum r soo
that q personal asse s,, eor oisic ON
statement filed with the assessors: that
petitioner AYERS that In making oot
said statement. he committed an srrcl
and upon submitting the matter 20 tne
Ancestors for investi CATION. said Board
recommends that said asssssment DC
reduced from s2.so to $1,000. which -
Re petition OF Flora b. Coleman. we
| ind that a personal assessment OF xlb.-
/ 500 was levied against her In the sec
cnd w. ward and nd Hsrson Ward r shs latter
covering $500 In mortgages and $1,000
| for an automobile. The Assessors ac-
knowledging the mortgage ss.essmens s
| to be double. we recommend that the
| assessment levied against her In the
Ninth ward be reduced from slossoo 10
Re petition of r. q. Taylor. We and
that q personal assessment OF ~ ESQ
was levied against him for 1910 upon
statement fled with the Assessors; that
ssa he MADE cieric.
that the error was made. recommeno
that said assessment be reduced from
re petition ss lion Of U. 8. Cap Mfg. Co.. we
find that through q clerical error upon
the part of the Board Of Assessors an
item Of $4,000 was carried forward on
acknowiedged. said Board recommends
that said assessment be reduced from
Ss7. ESQ TO ss.ss0. which recommenda-
ton il concurred In BY your Com
Re petition OF David J. Boyer. we
find that q personal assessment OF 1910
was levied against him for 1910 on
tititoner - and has mecn . resident OF
Crosse Pointe Farms. and 10 being. We
recommend that the taxes due on said
Re petition OF George Boutell. we ind
| that personal assessment OF $500 was
levied against him for 1910 upon state
ritioner in making out said statement
failed to include therein an offset OF
$1.5 500, and your COMMITTEES being satfs-
ned that ne = entitled 20 sme SHs9 he
Re petition OF Frank N. Brown, we
ind that personal asss:smept or OF
Sixteenth ward az administrators Of the
estate OF Minnie Seaman and that q
like assessment was levied against
tate In the Fourteenth ward. The As
SCISSORS acknowledging this to pc q
double assessment recommend that the
celied. which recommendation II con-
Re petition OF Mary F.. Davidson
S wT 81 so 500 , @s.
asainst her for 1910. which personal
property Is included in the statement
Of c. 4. Davidson. and your Commit Commit,
that this IL o double assessment. rec
ommcnd the calculation OF same.
Re petition OF Grace p Charm. We
was levied against her for 1910 upon
cash In bank: that petitioner In sep
tember. 1909, withdrew the funds and
Known AZ ais westminster avenue. The
papers being offered In evidence TO sub
stantiate her claim, we recommend that
said asss s.;n =, 1s ennc Wis@.rtb E.a
D Ds % assessmsnt Of si.ssc was
levied against the executor OF said es-
closed Dec. 81. 1909: that the Assessors
acknowledge this to be an error In as
scssing and ask TO have same canceIled.
which II concurred In oy your COM
Re petition Of ]. 8. Hamilton for
cancellation OF assessment against
Louis Drug Co. We mo that .; e perionss'
Hamilton at 20y0 Fort street west and
also q personal assessment OF $1,000
sga!nst Lois Drug Co. loS:te6 at Sors
that this II q double assessment. and
the Assessors being satisfied thereof.
recommend that the a9sessment levied
Re petition OF Mathew Markey, we
| And that a personal asssssmen Of $1,000
was levied against petitioner fo- 1910
through a clerical error upon the part
OF the Assessors. and said error being
acknowledged we recommend that said
assessment be cancelled.
Re petition OF Charles ooldstone, we
ind that personal assessment OF
81. 900 was levied against him for 1910
and that q personal assessment OF 800
was levied against Mrs. Goidstone for
same year; that petitioner 10 not en-
ga ICED I'm any business and has no per-
| the assessment levied against him for
| 1910 be cancelled. and the Committee
being satisfied that this 70 double as
sessment, recommend that the personal
assessment levied against petitioner be
Re petition OF Ernest A. Schultz, we
| ind that a personal assessment OF $500
| was levied against him for 1910 on
| land contract. which land contract your
petitioner sold In April last and In
vested the proceeds In other property.
upon which petitioner has paid the
taxes Your Committee being satisfied
thereof. recommend that said assess-
4 Re petition of Market Woodenware
Co. Thy Jos. A. Zechman), we find that
| a personal assessment OF $3.50 was
levied against said company for 1910.
that said company dissolved and dis
continued business in October. 1908.
business I'm the Fifteenth ward from
which latter location he filed a state
ment. Said assessment being ac-
knowlcdged to be erroneous, we rec
ommend that the same be cancelled.
| Re petition OF julius Kahn. we hnd
was levied against him upon statement
Glod from 81 Delaware ayeuue and In