The Detroit times. [volume] (Detroit, Mich.) 1903-1920, 1910-08-10

n nSs. the : v :Y@ ,|ss q: = q
s g; s ss ss:. ss =; 2 i'sk e
Rs.olvsd. Thas ths cry ~ ~
and he - herehy eutn6clS94
lot ' q Of = SUB s's 81 iists II 10, III
and the south part cf - -
being the taxes upon valu6tfG'
$3.50. In full settlemonf -, e1o o1uC
sf for 1917 fsnss . ,sg's ssn ssss't ~ 80
owing TO clerical error a W &o1@ T.
the. Asseseors ofdcs, en1 l4g844I :
structed to accept fron 54t4 "a ~
the sum OF Sss;l3, bAin4 M
against him for 1910 esd sS1es{
balance due. owing to clerical efror
part OF the AssessorS Office > (
Yeas--Ald. Allan. Burton. pe(41 3
Field, Freiwald, Garyey, 0eees9
e ennSIy xgn.man Ksetingt Ess. &
owen, Reinhsrdt. Rossnthel HS(}Sy 4
Schultz. shapland skrsycki. ThS@4e
w vsH%Rs0q wing srs znk z zssHsr olssss
and President Pro Tennis.
Nays-None. n
FROM THE SAME.
To the Honorable the Common Counolls
Gentlemen--Your Committee on 9ax1Q
to whom was referred the peitioqq -
]. Johns. Milton A. Van Wagner. PetoS
Brick Co., W. ,. G. Bantin. K: y. Jon9es
CHRISTOPHER Herppich, Herman Leltnet}
Chas. +. Hammond. Bertha Gibbs, Fyo6R.
erick Stenen. Henry Neussl. VIM. ~
Willis W. Allen. Mary r. r. ButjoSsS
Eliza III. Sebring Mrs. A. 0trtnger. Mira
w. Risse, Kate Lorish, Mrs. r. Huyro{r'
for the cancellation. reduction Of a.
1ustment OF certain general city taxp9
and personal assessment levied agnenef
that we se have had f ali ss q ssid mHfRs{S
under consideration and after consultor
tion with the Board OF AsssssoFs. ~
Rspe shf o Ssta Ds.p ssRSs
find that petitioner Is the owner Of pFeel
ises known as 4s7 Mack avenue. an
petitioner AYERS that the assessssa$
that we submitted the matter 20 i6&
Assessors and said Board reeommeudo ~
reduction Of $500, which Is concurred ~
by your committee. ~%
Repetition of August Netschke. W.
East 40 II OF lot 1870. Riopeile faS1n~
ETC.. situate on the :. Gnsst9ak
ngures from the field book to the nseem<
ment roll. raised the value OF barn from
$50 to $500, and the error being AeS
knowledged. we recommend refund o0
4 $4Aa- 90 araE-eAasEa- ----- ----
Repetition. OF Mary Jane Johns. ~:
md that petitioner Is the owner of ~
on the MS. Milwaukee avenue: that
through a clerical error the valuation Of
one OF the buildings located on said lntl
was raised from $500 to &l.40O, and the
Assessors acknowledging same. we rec
Commend a refund OF taxes on $1,000.
Repetition OF Milton A. Van Wasonexf,
lot 20 and east Y lot FL. McOraw's sulH !.
letc.. Wreforc Place; that q building
valued at $500 was erroneously place4
and said error being acknowledged "
the Assessors, we recommend refuuA'
Of taxes on said oyer-charge In valun-'
ltion. VI;
Repetition OF Peter Brock, We nn6,
that petitioner is the owner OF lot ~
VIM. rait's sub. of lot 5. etc. =. ~
that the building located on said vi IN
, over-assessed and upon submitting IN
matter to the Assessors for fnvest1tpS'
ton OF 5000 which Is concurred in by.
your committee. 81
Repetition OF j. d. McKinna. we fiuA'
that ,,I personal assessment s,s.s 90, 81 saaos
statement filed with the assessors. but:
that In making out same petitioner In
elnded therein household Goods to The
the statute and being satisfied that an
error was made. we recommend re-
duction In the assessment OF said sum.
Repetition Of stephen Pratt Co... Ne
find that n personal assessment Of Slzos
was levied against said company In the
Twelfth ward, from which Local ton ~
statement was nled. and that In addition
thereto an assessment OF Sf1.400 WAS
levied against said company In the
Eighteenth ward: that the assessmeue
and so acknowledged, but that the latter
assessment Is erroneous. as petitioners
sold out their entire business. closing out
everything. in September, 1903. ana the
Assessors being satisfied that same y -
double assessment, we recommend that
latter assessment be cancelled
that n personal assessent of $500 was
levied against him for 1910 upon -
mortgage OF said amount, and upon.
which assessment the petitioner ns.'rss
loaned said sum from his brother In
Omaha to loan TO his son-in-law to In
vest In n farm. who on June 18th last
adjusted the loan nv repaying most OF
the principal which the petitioner In
turn returned TO his brother. 30 that
petitioner derived no beneht OF same IN
any form, shape or manner. and your
committee being satisfied that TN
facts stated are true. recommend that
the assessment be cancelled.
Repetition OF r. n. Johnson. we md
that personal assessent OF 5000 was
levied agains, him for 1910 on an auto
which petitioner sold In March last. ana
used the proceeds thereof for the pay
r,ent Of debts. and such being the caeo
We recommend that said assessment be
cancelled.
Repetition OF T.. W. Reid company,
we ind that a personal assessment OF
SIS 600 was levied against said company
for 1870 that said company was dis
solved on February 9th last. and notice
OF dissolution was fled with the Secretary
Of State. the original notice or which
was presented In evidence: that after
the dissolution there were no assessable
assets as related I'm said petition. ana
! your committee being satisfied thereof. we
recommend that said assessment be can
celled~
Repetition OF Margaret Fellman. we
find that n personal assessment OF W.
900 was levied against her for 1910 upon
statement filed with the Assessors. but
petitioner AYERS that an error was made
In making out same by including there
In household goods to the value OF sey-