The Washington herald. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1906-1939, 1910-02-22


land & Co; petition for writ Of ecrtioran to the
United States Circuit Court Of Appeals for the
Seventh circuit denied.
No. 7el The United States petitioner, vs. z J.
Lsyino & Co, petition for a wit Of csrtiorau to
the United States Circuit Court Of Appeals Tor the
Third circuit denied.
No 7s5. The United States petitioner. u o.
G. Hampstead s. Co. petition for wit q Ger
uoEsr 70 the United states Circuit Court Of Appeals
for the Third circuit denied.
No. 76S The United States, petitioner, - J. ".
Hampton, Jr & Co. petition for wit o. oerJiorsrt
70 the United States Circuit Court Of Appeals for
the Third circvit denled.
No. S3. joaquin Gil. plaintiff in error rs. tbs
United states IN erTor 10 the supreme Court g.
the Philippine Islands, docketed and dismissed and
mandate granted. on motion Of Mir. Solicitor Cen
eral Bowers for the defendant IN error.
No. 7&. Thomas fTanklin, plaintiff IL error. Vs.
The United States; motion 10 dismiss q affirm sub
mitted By Mr.. Solicitor General Bowers, for the
defendant IN error. in s1Sp0rt Of the motion. and
by Mr.. Holmes Conrad. Tor the plaintiff in error. in
opposition thereto.
No. 6s. The Interstate Commercs Commission.
appellant, vs. Chicago, Rock Island and PacidS
Railway Company ct all and 4
No 66i. Burhsm. Hanna, Munger Dry Gods
Company ct al, Appellants. IS. Chicago. Rock Isl-
and and Pacific Railway Company et al Teassigned
for argument On Monday April next after the case
already assigned for that day, on motion Of Nr.
Solicitor General Bowers. for the Interstate Com
merce Commission
No 81. The United States plaintiff in eTror vs..
William B. Hammers; passed. on motion Of Mr..
solicitor General Bowers for the plaintiff in error.
No. Cd The Interstate Commerce Commission.
appellant, - Chicago, Burlington ard Quincy Rail
road Company. advanced. Ia be heard with Nos
Cos and 664 On Monday. April next. as one case.
No 10. Chicago Railway Equipment Company,
petitioner. Us. Perry side Bearing Company e. a.
petition for a WIT q ceuiCran 10 the United States
Circuit Court q Appeals Tor the Seventh circuit
submitted BY Mr.. F. \. JudsOn, Nh George 7.
Il
toner, and b. Mr. Thomas +. Sheridan and Alr,
Clifton '. Edwards, for the respondents.
No. $50, General Electric COMPANY petitioner. rs.
Richmond Street and Interurban Railway Company;
petition for writ Of certorar TO the United States
Court Of Appeals for the Seventh circuit submitted
By Mr. l. F. H. Belts. for the petitioner.
No. rs joseph Z. Cay, appellant, vs. The Baltic
Mining Company 20 al advanced and assigned for
argument Monday. March H. with No. 7f and
other cases. one case, On motion Of Mr.. Fred
erick ]. Stms0n for the appellant.
No. 6S. Roswell Z. Messenger. petitioner,
Peter Andersen; motion 10 advance submitted BY
Mr.. Rhea 2. Cary for the respondent
No. SIS. Hudson OIL and Supply COMPANY appel
lant. Theodore B. Booaem. receiver. sc. mo
ton 10 advance submitted By Mr. De Lagnel BeTisF
for the appellant, suggestion Of dminution Of the
record and motion fcg writ Of ceTtioran submitted
b. Mr.. George S. silzer for the appellee.
No -. Original Elk parte: In the matter OF
Henry A. Cleland. petitioner; motion for leave %
file petition for writ Of mandamus submitted by
Mr.. Edwin DENLY, in behalf Of counsel for the petit
toner.
No ~ Great Falls and Old Dominion Railroad
Company, petitioner vs Gertrude T. Hill; petition
for WIT Of ceTtorau the Court OF Appeals for
the District Of Columbia submitted By Mr. Wilton
j. Lambert for the Petitioner, and By Mr.. joan a
kTtz. T., and Mr.. A. Z. L. Lecsie for the
| spondent.
| No 7s3 The City Of Chicago, petitioner. vs.. Erie
and Western Transportation Company: petition for
q wit a certiorari 20 the United States Circuit
Court Of Appeals for the Seventh circuit submitted
! by Mr. Samuel I. Fisher In behalf Of Nh Charles
4 Z kremer snd Mr. Edward J. Brundage for the
petitioner. and By MT Harvey D. GOulder. Mr.
/ Frank 5. Masten. Mr.. s. H. Holding Mr. c. W
/ Greenfield. and Nh. Frederick n. Brown Tor the
/ respondent
/ No. -. Original. Ia uarte. In the matter Of tbs
State Of Oklahoma by Charles y. Haskell. governor.
petitioner; motion for leave 70 Gle petition foE
wit Of prohibition submitted by Mr.. Fred S. Cald-
well and Mr.. joseph w. Bailey fer the petitioner
| No. - Original Xxx parte: in the matter Of Tbs
/ State Of Oklahoma, by Charles n. Haskell, petit
toner; motion for Leave 70 file petition for wit Of
! prohibition submitted by Mr. Fred S. Caldwell and
Mr.. Joseph ". Bailey for the petitioner.
! No. iS9 Shsvlin-Carpsntsr Company et al. plain
! tiffs in erTur The Stats Of Minnesota: sngnes-
ton Of elimination Of The record and motion fsr a
Wi: 4 ceTtiorari submitted b. Mr.. Charles Henry
Butler II behalf Of coUrS for the plaintiffs in
error, with leave TO counsel for the defendant in
eTOr to file brief in opposition to the motion within
| five days
No. 7g7. George ". Phillips. appellant. vs.. Fifty
Associates et a.. advanced and assigned fer argu-
ment Monday. March a. with No. AZ and other
cases, as one, motion Of Mr.. Barry Mohun for
the appellant
No. 70. Eugene NJ Organ. trustee Sc, petit
toner vs.. Julia Martin: PETITION for a wit Of csr-
tioTsri TO the United States Clrcuit Court II Ap-
peals for the Fifth circuit submitted By Mr.. c. B.
Randsl IN behalf Of Mr.. Charles K. Bell for tbs
petitioner.
70. ~ Perry H. Brundags. appellant, Va. Broad
way Realty Company ct al; and
No 7S5. Psul Lscroix. appellant. 5. Motor Taxi
| meter Cab Company Ct al advanced AMI assigned
for argument Monday. March Il. with No. AT
and other cases. one case, motion Of Mr..
Harry 7. Andrews fer the appellant
| No 7es. ArAW Lyman ct al, sppeilants Is.
| Interborolgh Rapid Transit Company ct al ad-
| vanced and assigned for argument on Monday
March H. with No. az and other cases as one case
on molten Of Mr.. Richard Reid Rogers for the ap-
| pellants.
No 100 VIII F. Woods petitioner. vs.. The United
| States; petition for g writ Of certioran to tbs
| United States Circuit Court Of Appeals FOR the
| Mr. Charles ". Ogden Cor the petitioner and By
Mr. Solicitor General Bowers for the appellants
Nc $50. James A Shine ct al. appellants ~
Fox Brothers Manufacturing Company; motion 20
dismiss submitted By Mr. Frank 5. Bright, In BE-
half q Mr.. Herbert r. Msratt and Mr. Frank H.
Sullivan for the appellee in support Of the motion
ard by Mr. Sheppard Barclay, Mr. Thomas T.
Fauatleroy, aud Mr. Cornelius II. fsuntleroy. for
the appellants. in opposition thereto.
| Nc. go. Great Northern Railway Company, petit
Continued on Page 1e, Column G.