The Washington herald. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1906-1939, 1910-03-02
DISTRICT COURTS.
Court of Appeals.

Present-An
AdmissiOlls-Riehard D. siio0a and Emory H.
Bogley.
No aR Palmer. Sc. vs.. Lenoyitz: appearance
of John Ridout attorney for appellee. Withdrawn
by leave Of court; cause passed until appeal,
No. 2lol S0nneman vs. Philadelphia, Baltimore
and Washington Railroad Company placed at foot
Of calendar.
No. s197 Hyde ct al. vs.. United states; passed
until April.
No s6Z Morris vs. Metropolitan surety Com
pany; death Of Martin f. Morris suggested, and
Helen ]. Morris executrix. made appellant herein
on motion Of Mr.. J. J. Darlington. attorney for
appellant, and continued
No. 2l02 Warner vs.. Baker; Continued
Nc, 2o5s. Goodman ct al Wren ct al; ne
versed. Opinion by Mr, Chief Justice Shepard
No. 9ol5. smoot rs. Heyi et al affirmed Opinion
by Mr.. Justice Van OTsdel.
No 36s. Gordon vs.. Gwydir ct al; affirmed
Opinion By Mr.. Chief Justice shepard
No G60 Hitchcock, sc. vs.. Tansey, &c ~
versed. Opinion By Mr. Justice Robe.
No. S7s. Williamson Is. Williamson; safiirned
Opinion by Mr. Justice Van Orsda.
No. 977 Robertson Va Gordon ct al. affirmed.
Opinion BY Mr. Chief Justice Shepard.
No 9o7s Metzgar Kelly e, al affirmed
Opinion by Mr.. Justice Van Orsdel.
No. 909s Indian Protective Association rs. Cor
don et al; affirmed. Opinion by Mr.. Chief Justioe
Shepard.
No. ssi. Barksdals. SC vs. Morgan ct al. sp-
peal dismissed Opinion By Mr., Justice Van Orsdei-
port, Sc affirmed. Opinion By Air. Justice Van
OEsdel
Patent Appeal, No tn Arbetter vs.. Lewis TO
TeFsed Opinion BY Mr. justice Robh,
Patent Appeal No. SO. Wsintrauh Hewitt
affirmed. Opinion by Ny, Justice Van orsdel.
Patent Appeal No SIS In re application OF Ma
tionsl Candy Company; continued
Patent Appeal No So William A. Rogers. LAM
tied. vs. International Silver COMPANY; affirmed.
/ Opinion by Mr. Justice Rob-. Dissenting opinion
By Mr. Chief Justice shepsrd.
No. 2e6 Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company
" Morgan; argument commenced By Mr.. John J.
/ Hamilton for appellant. continued hy Mr.. J. c.
/ Cuttings for appellee. and concluded by Mr. NJ ].
/ Colbert for appellant
! No nos Heine safety Boiler Company ct al vs..
/ United States, to use Of American Ensmeed Tie
and BUiCk Company; continued.
! No. asa. American Savings Bank vs.. Eisninser
/ argument commenced BY MT. C. II. Merillat fos
/ appellants
/ Assignments for TODAY:
/ No BE9 American Savings Bank ". ESninger
/ on hearing. Attorneys. Ne7illst-Csrud s Jones.
! No. aS4. Sweeney rs. Ewing. Attorneys. Bailey
I W0rthington.
No -0s5 Danenhoser vs. Hayes. Attorneys
/ Johnson-DaTid.
No. aas. Taylor vs. Columbia University. Attor.
nsys Davis & Naughton-Nattingly & clephane.
/ No. 2lCo. Miller IS, Ambrose Attorneys. Laskey
/ -Easby-snl.th.
No Wla Marrune V. Washington Jockey Club
Attoneys Provost & BSiey-WoTthingtOn.
No. g8- Jordan vs. LaDdTam Ell al. Attorneys
/ Hackett-H emrhill.
/ No, aa3. Philadelphia, Baltimore and washinstor
Railroad Company ~ Tucker. Attorneys. Mcken
| ney FianneTy & Hitz-Sewmyer & David
! No. 104. National City Bank ~ Nindolph- At
4 toTneys RalstOn-Gsrdiner.
No. zlo5. Tyssowsd vs.. Smith Company. Alter
neys. Wilson & Wilson.