The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1910-08-31
BUSTANOBY FAMILY DISCORD
GtFE mrs BEiIN ARTS ROW =
tIRED ~ COt nj.
ArbHater Of nuarT~ls sf Three Brothers
FIn~d ever sSOO for TakIng his VIE
10 Their HuntInEtsR Establishment
Court kreps Louis In His job.

brothers andre and Jacques from Dust
, ing him as vice president of the BusianOhy
. Rrus who run IN. Cafe d~S B''aux Arts
D IA West Fortiath street aud IN" ChAtea'I
de- BsauN Arts AZ Huntington, l.. J.
The papers filed With the deCision show
that me reason for the falling ont II th"
hr"thers was a fine IT SS' imposed IN
jacques Nv an arbitrator for taking his
wife - the Chateau deH B-auN Arts On
July 3 and last. and another was tn"
promotion 10y jacques ~ -cornh ''deT, >
device 10 facilitate tho ConsunI tion
IT corn On 'he ear
LOUIS also brought suit 30 restrain rs
/ brothers from removing IN" manage
IL the Huntington plaf'e and two head
waters un the ground that they are
his friends and ~ compel his brothers
t. live up - an arbitration agreement
| by whIch all differences between them
were to h, submitted 20 \ 4 Anderson
owner Of the studio building m which the
cate des Baaua Arts ~ situated. tor his
daCislon
When ~" case was submitted To- Justice
RisCh1n q month ago none ~ Me tru'h"rs
would saw much concerning the undsrly-
ing caTses - their Disagreement. except
that family disputes were to blame Jus
tIcs Rlschpf IN his decisiun yesterday
declines, ~ dirr,' Andre and Jacques 10
lhli" 10y the decision ~ the arbitrator
Jus'ic" Hschor SAID that an agreement
To- submit disputes IN a corporation to a
tniri person who has no interest m the
corporation cannot h. enforced heCa'Is-
such an 'itorI rotation would result IN
the domination of the affairs 81 a corpora
u'n ~ person rpt Interested IN a.
which ~ m conflict with the provision
Of the general corporation Law requiring
'hai ~" affairs II = corporation be man
aged bv the board - directors
IHd'r this decision Louis romans a.
VICE pres dent which place he holds 10y
virtue ~ AN agreement ~ the brothers
fnr rotation IN uffiur Andre ~ now presi-
dent and Ja~lues secretary and treasurer
In hIs moving affid.VIt Ions saws thai
when IN" business ~ BustAnoby Bros
was started b" put N al the capita, but
let HE brothers nave AN equal Interest
with him. with tho result that when u
was Incorporated IN iSOs each had lOO
shares Disputes arose IA the SIX months
prior tu March 1870 LOUIS offered 20 sell
uut u hls brothers for sino OoO. with the
understanding that Il they couldn't buy
they should submit all their disputes
To- 4 \ Anderson as Arbitrator They
cuuldn', rai-. the money. 80 the arhi-
trafInn agreement became effective He
laws hJs brothers wouldn't abide 10y the
arbitrator decision and that on July -
hr got motto" that they were 20 meet 20
remuv. him Then he asked for the IN
Junction
Louis saws II - imperative for IN"
creditors who have claims - $1,000.
that t'c business shall 10 managed by
comp"tent and skllful persons He has
udur-..d a demand note for st2 nOO and
lays that II be- has go pay Il he defend
ants will h." unable 10 respond for their
share
The first trouble arose. Louis says
when JacpueS made overcirafts of n.nO
IN Iso~. and later the brothers didn't
agr~" b"cau-. h. wanted the pay Of each
officer reduced from SO on year with
board and lodging 20 IS GO year With
hoard and Lodging Because he insisted
that IN" arbitrator fine jacques sSIo
fnr taking hiS wife 90 the Chateau in vio-
la'ion 81 the agr~ment and because he
oppused the 'lse by Jacques 81 the yiresti &c
- the corporation IN promoting his corn
holder Their" was more trouble. but
JAG lIes ard Andre always held 'ogei her
against him
ID. ,..,,., ,,, ,ho, ,aII a,,, $50
,la,,.oI,',,.- -. to,,i. 80 -, r.
=, .,,,I..I -. IN ,.II 80, - rL
40, o,I, ,,,i,..,, hx, ,h, .,,..,.,ro - :,
a,,,,,,,,. ,ar..t -, d.,.n.,,
Louis declares the brothers told him
they would -kick him ON, 81 the busin...
He attaches 10 his paueru the dec,sion
81 tb. arbitrator on the subject Of hntpg
Iar,,u.a winch showa that Iouis al.o
wanted Andre Nned Ssno for taxing his
sistar.iu-Iaw ~ ,h. ChA,eau Tho AZ
bitra,or found Jscouea guilty q, ,aLips
hrs vii. ,o IN. chateau ON .Iu,y and :,
and dtrac+a that he nav tno int ,h.
treasury forthwith The arbitrator avs
fur,h.r.
At the hearing som. dorb, was raised
~ 90 whether immediate families re-
ferrad 90 IN the above decision includes
a slster-in-law did not subject Andre
n. a.