The Charles Mix new era. (Wagner, Charles Mix County, S.D.) 1???-1911, 1910-11-04
SOUND REASONS FOR
COUNTY OPTION
FIRST.

FIRST.
Although the state went vet this.
teen years ago, our present law, which
~ Home Rule League says is "Ideal'
requires u second Home Rule vote inst
The same as now provided by the ~
Dssed County Option Bill, to detsrnns
q the Spring election WHERE ana
WHERE NOT saloons shall b liss.ssA
by MAJORITY vote. whe h nsa,
enough to insist On FORCING alss,s
Von communities that % net wsnt
sAsni
SECOND.
County Option is Tsir, fSr n sshs
permission af ALL The CS~aty Tsz-
payers, the privilege u hss,stna ~
lssns for which ALL County ta1psysss
sss taxed. ALL ssunty taxpaysrs have
ne right to b heard sa whatever q.
fesS the TAX RATE.
Cornty Option does not open ~ asee
Ter FOREIGN DOMINATION Il tAs
local affair, Of ths community, - In
simulated by the Rene Ruiz League,
slandering ts1paying farmers, bat \
closes the deer to DREwERY DOM.
NATION, BBIwEaY coLoNIyINo,
sad BREWI1Y abss>iag ef bunl ~
giAG.
County Optasa wsulA pet fs4ss ~
hihitisa upon se~naaitiss tAat AZ ~
in sympathy WITH the dry policy, Or
Cesati~ Nat ls~s . strong ss.ti0snt
for salesas anA vets vet rs GIVEN
sALOONo wAS,svsr ~ majority II ths
voters in tie vG,is~s towns WAIT
THEN.
County Opta Is act = fsrssd ahsH
nen@ Of p~rohiAitisa measure ~ nsss
than w have forced abstinence - ~
hibition new BY . .ajs.ty vs@s. csss-
ty Option would not mssa rrsAtSltfsa
unless all the ssuasiss BY majority vsss,
should vvss dry. csa.ty Optic. amply
gives those TAXPAYIRs WHO SUP
FER Apsn ~ M3os, ~ Yi01A - b
heard.
r.. 0lX1E.
County Option doe ~ mem the
forcing e salos.s upsn Om~xn1ttes
where they are net wanted. b~A Il aeaas
the liberty Of . sonnty ~ tszpnysEs, to
determine by majority vcte, BY ceun
ty Home Rule, whethsr ,tAey WIN per
NIT saloons anywhere in H.. sSnnty.
1t is not for the regulation Of personal
habits, be-: II \ county regulation Of
the County puSiis drinking place. The
republicans Of Nebraska, in state plat
form, declare "ror the further and
better REGULATION Of the liquor
traffic, We favor the paaass Of tAs
County Option Rill."
SEVENTH.
"Couaty 0ption 10 the beat nstheA
Of dealing with the liquor question: is
the phrase Of William Jennings Bryan,
has never bssa repealed in Is states
where they txvs tried it. No REPEAL
speaks vel~ass.
EIGHTH.
Cexz0 Option wilt Seno&t the FAR
MERS VIE reside IN sess~SEitiss who're
the sentiment u fl favor ct license,
for, while they ns5 new vs9e IL. 81
looms OF their swn farm, tas- cannot
vote them cut Of the tswa whore they
trade, pay thsir tl.ss, ssssnA court,
send their sAiI1rsR 10 ssAssl and whore
their daughters aad wives, arriving their
teams homo, meat stAss teams at
THEIR PERIL, driven BY &runksn mes.
NINTH.
County Option, with Ns eoanty law
enforcement n~ssaiaery back Of the law,
has, acesnalag to GOVERNOR HAN,
LEY, Of Indiana, reduced arrssts for
drunkenness and commitments to prison
and all sorts Of crime about ~ per esat
in Indiana WHERE THE Law RAS
BEEN TRIED.
TENTH.
tn. couNrERFEIrERs, corKFE-
SANS, GAMBLERS and THIEvDs
might a. we'll openly threaten TIE yao.
lie At large that thoy will run THEN
houses secretly ana dsay authority, II
they a,s aot Res1ssd, a. for shs sA'
LOON KEEr1HS 10 huA dsvs rs W.
tiers with tho threat, "Ysu s.ksaasAiss
the farmers and vsts - eat, ~ ~
will run OUR SHOPS secretly a. blia(
piggers and win not give yen : ds
lar Of the bleed.rsd revenue Mat ssA4
across the bar - yesr s&ass Of IL
spoils." The qssstisa h - to III
voters sl November stA, "shsll til
PEOPLE RULE, Oh THN cRIAd