The Seattle star. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1899-1947, 1910-12-19

At-"f no RAH WRsNA n bANA NJ Law
an not nEhting law. am fighting
iawiesaneaa. ] never violated the Law .
violated iawfessusas and was compelled
20 seek constitutional protection against
the arbitrary power exercised hy the
Dental Board 10 the Dental Law pre-
scFibsd an examination 80 that a
Dentist would know what be WAS going
q be examined in, and 10 The rHnultna-
ton papers were public records. and sgl-
eeHes in court ~ Justice o. would BE-
an eaET matter 20 prove whether tha
Dental Combine violated The law. because
y Dental Board asks questions that
they Themselves cannot answer ~ Or
they give one Dentist certificate who
gave no answers. and denied a certificate
70 Dentist who gave correct nnar srH.
the examination pa p~rs wiu sh0w lf and
the Board when Put upon the witness
stand Will be dHarfad into inslEuififauos.
and their official parndF viii be- easily
proven. under a Real Dental Law where
and when law governs whkh protects the
public and the Dentist in his private
rights
II 10 not necessary 10 destroy private
rights IN order 20 protect the public
against incompetent Dentists We aIi
have our personal Idea Of what cYusfi
tutee Dental examination yet DO we ail
prescribed a Dental examination. who
would be- able 10 pass 30 and rut our
personal whimH7 DO you not Hee that tho
state has the power 90 regulate the prar-
tice u Dentistry. but % has not eEerrised
this power but turned it Into "a special
privilege by deiegating this power % tne
Dental combina7
There t. - law when and where ono
man IS compelled 20 submit 90 the arbi-
trary. uuresfrsined viii ~ another in
order that he may acquire the means ~
life Law De- the manifest Idea Of tho
state and iH susceptible ~ being compre-
hsudsd known and underHfo0d. bat arr
bitrary power uureHffalned IL anarchy.
and dueils within The uuknowabic mind
Of the individual and is manifest only
want a Dental Law that protects the
people against incompetent Dentists.
want law that preHCribfH an fKamiua-
ton Tor Dentists ! want "a Dental Law
that protects Dentist iH hiH natural
riFhtH. I want a Dental Law under which
the courts will enforce and administer
the iaw and not make the law ! want
Dental Law which wiii guide ths
courts aF veil aH the Dental Board and
secure "a Dentist against arbitrary power
J want "a Dental Law which VIII destroy
The Denial combine. 7 want Dental
Law that viii compel every Dentist t0
undergo examination ~ prove bic quail.
ncafi0u Tho state should exercise the
powers 0f government moo fhe Dental
Combine. waut gpeornmcnt Of law.
not men. especially Dentists. Nothing
would suit me better than 90 40 baf4ra
n public audience and take Dental nr-
HhflNN WIN iNiH AfHhfhI combine
and ~ ] had been allowed 10 take their
records into court. the Dental Law OF
this state and the Dental Combine would
b. n thing ~ the past. buf the courts
Themselves prevented me. aud fHla made
the power % the Dental Combine abso-
lutte
Yea Z want Dental Law bot mo
Combine wants what it now haze a
MONOPOLY. ! am fighting this monop-
oiy and ] have written "a Dental Law
Tor the purpose % destroying &c.
shall begin the publication ~ this
Law ln the nest Monday star
EDWfH BROWN