The Lake County times. [volume] (Hammond, Ind.) 1906-1933, 1910-02-11

pand, whose true christian name Is un-
known. as 90 said lot be foreclosed and |
cut on: that the plaintiff 10 entitled
Ito q reasonable attorneys fee for the |
foreclosure of said lien and that rea- |
sonable sum therefore Is five dollars.
/ The court further nnds that there Is
now due the plaintiff from lot seven
CD. block seventeen t17). Oak Park adj
dftton to Tolleston, the sum OF one and
sb-1oo (s1.65l dollars; that the plaintiff
Is entitled to the foreclosure of said
lien against said lot and that the equity
OF the defedants. Isabel C. Gray and
= Gray, her husband, whose true
| christian name Is unknown. to said
lot be foreclosed and cut on; that the
plaintiff is entitled to a reasonable at
torney's fee for the foreclosure OF said
lien and that a reasonable sum there
| fore Is Ave dollars.
| The court further finds that there Is
| now due the plaintiff from lot eight
/ go, block seventeen CID. Oak Park
addition to Tolleston, the sum of one
| and 65-1oo ($1s5) dollars; that the
plaintiff is entitled to the foreclosure of
said lien against said lot and that the
equity of redemption OF the defendants,
Isabel c. Gray and Gray her hus-
band, whose true christian name IL un-
known, as to said lot be foreclosed and
cut OF; that the plaintiff is entitled to
a reasonable attorneys fee for the FORE
closure of said lien and that reason
able sum therefore is five dollars.
The court further finds that there IL
now due the plaintiff from lot nine co..
block seventeen I'D, Oak Park addi-
ton to Tolleston. the sum of one and
$1,000 ($1.65) dollars; that the plaintiff
is entitled to the foreclosure of said
lien against said lot and that the equity
Schaaf and -Schaaf, his wife, whose
true christian name is unknown. as to
said lot be foreclosed and cut on; that
the plaintiff Is entitled to q reasonable
attorneys fee for the foreclosure of
said lien and that reasonable sum
therefore is Ave dollars.
4 The court further finds that there Is
now due the plaintiff from lot twenty
(2o), block seventeen (17). Oak Park
addition to Tolleston, the sum of one
and e5-10O (s1.e5) dollars; that the
PLAINTIFF Is entitled to the foreclosure
of said lien against said lot and that
the equity of redemption of the defend
ant. Clear Title Land Company, as to
said lot be foreclosed and cut on; that
the plaintiff Is entitled to q reasonable
attorneys fee for the foreclosure of
said lien and that reasonable sum
therefore is Ave dollars.
The court further finds that there is
now due the plaintiff from lot twenty
one (21), block seventeen CID, Oak
Park addition to Tolleston, the sum of
one and s5-1oo ($1.e5) dollars; that the
plaintiff is entitled to the foreclosure
of said lien against said lot and that
} the equity of redemption Of the defend
ant, Clear Title Land Company as to
) said lot be foreclosed and cut on; that
the plaintiff is entitled to reasonable
( attorneys fee for the foreclosure of
; said lien and that a reasonable sum
, therefore is five dollars.
, The court further finds that there is
t now due the plaintiff from lot twenty
: four GA. block seventeen I'D. Oak
: Park addition to Toneston, the sum of
, one and 65-10o ($1.65) dollars: that the
I plaintiff Is entitled to the foreclosure
; of said lien against said lot and that
: the equity of redemption OF the defend
l ants, Frederick Krorke and -
Krorke, his wife, whose true christian
name is unknown; Esther e. Porter and
8 - Porter, her husband; and Charles C.
1 Teare and - Teare, his wife, whose true
I christian name is unknown, as to said
D lot be foreclosed and cut on; that the
: plaintiff is entitled to q reasonable at
i torney's fee for the foreclosure of said
( lien and that a reasonable sum there
s fore Is I'VE dollars.
8 The court further finds that there Is
i now due the plaintiff from lot three CD,
= block eighteen (1s), Oak Park addition
e to Tolleston, the sum of one and 65-1o0
t ($1.65) dollars; that the plaintiff is en-
= titled to the foreclosure of said lien
against said lot and that the equity OF
8 redemption of the defendants, Frank
Boguslawsky and - Boguslawsky,
: his wife, whose true christian name is
d unknown; Esther e. Porter and -
: Porter, her husband. whose true chris
f tian name is unknown; and Charles c.
e Teare and - Teare. his wife, whose
|. true christian name is unknown. as to
d said lot be foreclosed and cut of; that
Q the plaintiff Is entitled to a reasonable
: attorneys fee for the foreclosure OF
d said lien and that q reasonable sum
: therefore is five dollars.
The court further finds that there IL
s now due the plaintiff from lot eleven
: cd, block eighteen (1s). Oak Park
: addition to Tolleston, the sum OF one
n and e5-1oo (s1.65) dollars; that the
e plaintiff Is entitled to the foreclosure OF
e said lien against said lot and that the
t equity of redemption of the defend
: ants, Jake Jacobson and - Jacobson
:, his wife, whose true christian name Is
n unknown, as to said lot be foreclosed
e and cut off; that the plaintiff Is enti-
! tied to q reasonable attorneys fee fol-
: the foreclosure of said lien and that q
d reasonable sum therefore is five dollars
= The court further finds that there Is
now due the plaintiff from lot twelve
!. CID, block eighteen GS), Oak Park
>. addition to Tolleston, the sum of one
! and $500 (s1.65) dollars; that the
n plaintiff is entitled to the foreclosure
. of said lien against said lot and that
- the equity OF redemption of the defend
= ants, Jake Jacobson and - Jacobson
/ his wife, whose true christian name Is
- unknown, as to said lot be foreclosee
Is and cut off; that the plaintiff is emit
a tied to a reasonable attorneys fee fol
a the foreclosure of said lien and that g