The Telegraph-courier. [volume] (Kenosha, Wis.) 1888-1946, 1910-03-17
CRIMINAL CASES INTERESTING
Many Civil Actions Will be Heard by
the Jury but it is Expected That
the Work of the Term Will be Con-
Guided in a Month

Thirty-two cases are noticed for
trial at the annual March term of the
circuit court which begins on next
Monday morning and it is probable
that the court will be kept busy for
the better part of month in dispos-
ing of the calendar. The calendar
of criminal cases is a short one con-
sisting of but four cases. The old
case Of the State against Rose, charg-
ed with cutting man on the electric
car north Of Kenosha is to be tried
again. The case of the State VS.
Thomas Thorne and other Chicago men
charged with coming to Kenosha with
a view of "planting'' evidence for a
divorce case is on the calendar as is
the case against John j. Buttles, the
Chicago real estate man, charged with
fradulently securing deed to farm in
the town Of Bristol. The full list
of cases noticed for trial follows:
Criminal Gases
State Of Wisconsin, plaintiff VS..
Charles Beemer, defendant.
State of Wisconsin, plaintiff, VS..
Thomas Thorne, ct al, defendant.
State of Wisconsin, plaintiff, vs.
Charles Rose, defendant.
State of Wisconsin, plaintiff, vs.
John J. Buttles, defendant.
Issues of Fact for Jury
Mary Bolotri, plaintiff VS.. Christian
Norgaard, defendant.
William schmorrow, plaintiff VS..
Mary Kneipp, defendant.
Charles Cooper Company, a corpora
tion, plaintiff VS.. Charles W. Allen and
Nathan Allen, GO partners, doing bust
ness under the firm name and style of
N. r. Allen s Sons, defendants.
Hans Nelson, an infant, plaintiff vs.
John Kettlehut, defendant.
Matthias Mungen, plaintiff VS.. Clar-
ence White and Matthias Brockhaus,
co-partners, defendants.
John T. McRae, plaintiff VS.. Frank
Kuhn, defendant.
John Kuchner, plaintiff VS.. M. Grot-
sky, defendant.
Clayton Lucas, plaintiff VS.. Chas. H.
Pfennig, defendant.
Armour & Company, corporation,
plaintiff VS.. Justus George Richter, j.
Louis Pofahl and J. II. Pafahl, defen-
dants
zelda Woodson, by Charles Wood
son, her guardian, plaintiff VS.. Ira
Whitehead, defendant
In the matter of the Last Will and
Testament of William Brook, deceased
appeal from county court
Margaret A. O'Hare, plaintiff VS..
IS. H. Knox & Company, corporation,
defendants.
T. Gaastra, plaintiff vs.. Harry L.
Goldberg, defendant.
T. Gaastra, plaintiff VS.. Harry l..
Goldberg, defendant.
Angelo Cerminara, plaintiff VS.. Do
menico ziccorelli and Teresina Zic-
corelli, defendants
Bernard McGivern, plaintiff VS.. An
drew Tennessen, defendant
William Marx, plaintiff VS.. Edward
Rowell, defendant.
Anton Munko, plaintiff VS.. Allan
Cole, defendant.
Jens NJ. Rasmussen, plaintiff VS.. A.
R. Bounsall, defendant.
Nicholas Pirsch Company, corpora-
ton, plaintiff VS.. F. W. B. Achen, de.
PENDANT.
John Williamson, plaintiff VS.. Thos.
J. Irwin, defendant. Appeal from
Municipal Court.
DR.. j. B. spalding, plaintiff VS..
Bradford Kent and Milton Kent, CO.
partners, trading under the name of
Kent Motor Co., Defendants. Appeal
from Municipal Court.
Roman Komorowskl, plaintiff VS..
John Hochmuth, defendant.
Issues of Fact for Court
Charles S. Lothrop, plaintiff VS.. VIII
liam g. Burr, ct al, defendants.
Martha Ebert, plaintiff vs.. Henry
Ebert, defendant.
Thomas Martin, executor, ct al,
plaintiffs vs.. James Brook, ct al, de-
PENDANTS.
Ulrike Friedeek, plaintiff VS.. Carl
Friedeck, defendant.
John Millward, William J. RYAN
and Anton Morsch, plaintiffs VS.. Ke
(nosha Electric Railway Co.. defendant.