The Lake County times. [volume] (Hammond, Ind.) 1906-1933, 1910-02-11

and cut on. that the plaintiff Is enti-
tied to reasonable attorneys fee for
the foreclosure of said lien and that a
reasonable sum therefore is I'VE dol
lars
The court further nnds that there Is
now due the plaintiff from lot twenty
I'VE (25), block sixteen (1e). Oak Park
addition to Tolleston. the sum of one
and 65-100 (s1.e5) dollars: that the
plaintiff is entitled TO the foreclosure
OF said lien against said lot and that
the equity OF redemption of the de-
PENDANTS. Francis A. Beck and
Beck. his wife. whose true christian
name Is unknown. as to said lot be fore
closed and cut of; that the plaintiff is
entitled to reasonable attorneys fee
for the foreclosure of said lien and
that reasonable sum therefore is I'VE
dollars.
The court further finds that there Is
now due the plaintiff from lot twenty
seven (27). block sixteen (1s). Oak
Park addition to Tolleston, the sum of
one and s5-1o0 ($1.e5) dollars; that the
plaintiff is entitled to the foreclosure
of said lien against said lot and that
the equity OF redemption Of the de-
| PENDANT, Clear Title Land Company.
to said lot be foreclosed and cut off;
| that the plaintiff is entitled to rea-
ure of said lien and that a reasonable
sum therefore is ave dollars.
| The court further finds that there Is
now due the plaintiff from lot twenty
eight (2S). block sixteen (16), Oak Park
addition to Tolleston. the sum OF one
and s5-1oo es1.e5) dollars: that the
plaintiff Is entitled to the foreclosure
OF said lien against said lot and that
the equity OF redemption of the defend
ants, John Crontos and - Crontos.
| his wife. whose true christian name is
unknown, as to said lot be foreclosed
and cut on; that the plaintiff is enti-
tied to q reasonable attorneys fee for
| the foreclosure of said lien and that
reasonable sum therefore Is Ave dol
lars.
/ The court further finds that there is
now due the plaintiff from lot twenty
nine (2s), block sixteen (16), Oak Park
| addition to ToIleston, the sum OF one
and $500 ($1.e5) dollars that the
plaintiff is entitled to the foreclosure
Of said lien and as against said lot
and that the equity of redemption OF
the defendants. Steve Lengyel and -
Lengyel, his wife, whose true christian
name Is unknown. as to said lot be fore
/ closed and cut off; that the plaintiff is
entitled to reasonable attorneys Zee
for the foreclosure of said lien and
that reasonable sum therefore Is hve
dollars.
The court further finds that there is
now due the plaintiff from lot thirty
(3o), block sixteen G6). Oak Park adj
ditfon to Tolleston, the sum of one and
65-100 ($1.65) dollars: that the plain
tiff is entitled to the foreclosure OF
; said lien against said lot and that the
equity of redemption OF the defendants,
Steve Spisak and Anna Spisak as to
said lot be forec1osed and cut on. that
! the plaintiff Is entitled to a reasonable
attorneys fee for the foreclosure of
: said lien and that reasonable sum
: therefore is five dollars.
The court further finds that there is
now due the plaintiff from lot thirty
: lone (31), block sixteen (16), Oak Park
> addition to Tolleston. the sum. of one
| and $500 ($1.65) dollars; t9at the
plaintin is entitled to the foreclosure
OF said lien against said lot and that
, the equity of redemption of the defend
|. ants. Andy Procnal and - Procnal
! his wife whose true christian name is
Z unknown. as to said lot be foreclosed
!, and cut off: that the plaintiff is enti-
tied to a reasonable attorneys fee for
= the foreclosure of said lien and that a
: reasonable sum therefore is five dol
lars.
II The court further finds that there Is
: now due the plaintiff from lot thirty
three $3.50, block sixteen (l6).s OAK
!. park addition to Toleston, the sum of
. one and e5-10o ($1.s5) dollars; that the
, plaintiff is entitled to the foreclosure
4 Of said lien against said lot and that
the equity of redemption of the defend
, ants Alice Regain and - Regan. her
: | husband, whose true christian name is
unknown; Walter S. Ross and -
. Ross. his wife, whose true christian
= name is unknown; Charles c. Teare and
IL Teare his wife, whose true chris
a / tan name is unknown, as to said lot
: be foreclosed and cut off; that the
plaintiff Is entitled to reasonable at
{ torney's fee for the foreclosure OF said
, lien and that a reasonable sum there
fore is five dollars.
81 The court further finds that there is
e now due the plaintiff from lot thirty
!, four (s4. block sixteen U6). Oak
D Park addition to Tolleston, the sum OF
: one and $500 (s1.65) dollars; that the
n plaintin is entitled to the foreclosure
+ Of said lien against said lot ard that
n the equity of redemption OF the defend
E ants. Alice Regan and - Regain. her
D husband whose true christian name is
t unknown; Walter s. Ross and -
E Ross his wife; Charles c. Teare and
II Teare, his wife, whose true CHRIS
4 tian name is unknown. as to said lot
| be foreclosed and cut Off; that the
plaintiff is entitled to reasonable at
: tprney's fee for the foreclosure of
{ said lien and that a reasonable sum
+ therefore is five dollars.
The court further finds that there Is
. now due the plaintiff from lot thirty
: ave 1857. block sixteen (1s), Oak
Park addition to Tolleston, the sum OF
one and 65-100 ($1-65) dollars that the
plaintiff is entitled to the foreclosure
of said lien against said lot and that
. the equity of redemption of the defend
ants, Mary Regain and - Regain, her
husband. whose true christian name IS