Perth Amboy evening news., 1910-10-28
4 LEGAL DILEMMA
TangIe Of Red Tape In an Eng
Iish ExtradItIon Case.
GETTING AROUND THE LAW.

Only the Quick VII Of the Canadian
PsIles Inspector Kept q Notorious
Criminal In Custody When In Realty
He Was as Free as the Air.
The manner In which a prisoner ex-
traditsd to England from a foreign
country Is treated while on the voyage
home depends very much on the de-
tective who has him In charge and
also on whether or no there is any
suspicion that he may be contemplat-
ing violence either TO himself or to
| others.
For instance, In the case Of Jabez
Balfour, who was taken to England all
the way from Buenos Aires, there
was a strong suspicion-probably Ill
founded-that he contemplated COM
hitting suicide. Consequently Inspec-
tor Froest, who had him In charge, de-
cided to take no risks that he could
possibly avoid.
The regulations do not permit of an
unconvicted prisoner being handcuffed
on board ship once the vessel has left
port. and he must be allowed one
hours exercise or deck each day.
These indulgences, II indulgences they
may be called, were therefore not
withheld from Balfour.
But he got few others. For twenty
three hours out Of every twenty-four
he was fmmured In a locked cabin. He
vas not permitted even to enter the
public dining room, his meals being
brought to him by MI. Froest himself
after the rest Of the passengers had
fed. He was, besides, constantly
watched and was subjected to a most
rigorous search Immediately on com
ing aboard.
His only relaxation was an occa-
sional game of chess with some Of the
passengers who kindly came to his
cabin to play with him by permission
and In the presence Of his keeper.
This sea imprisonment lasted exactly
n month and a day, and Balfour
afterward declared that It was the
most trying experience of a captivity
that was destined to continue for
nearly twelve years.
One of the longest and In its later
stages n of the ~pleasantest voyages
ever undertaken by an unconvicted
criminal was that which Charles Hyl-
ton Davidson, the notorious forger,
made some years back In the custody
of Chief Inspector Murray of the Ca
madam department of Justice.
Murray tracked the wanted man to
Mexico and secured his extradition to
Canada. But then his difficulties be-
gan. He could not bring his prisoner
to Canada by the direct route through
the United States, for Immediately
Davidson set foot In that country he
could have demanded to be released.
There was therefore nothing for 1t but
to convey him by way of Jamaica and
England and thence back across the
Atlantic to Quebec.
On the voyage Murray kept David
son under close observation, although
allowing him considerably more free
dom than Froest allowed Baifour.
When, however, he had got safely as
LAX d5 1OuuO nc was DOku ulOI tluS0
and astonished at the likelihood of his
having had all his trouble for nothing.
The law was, he was told, that a
prisoner extradited from a foreign
country to q British colony could not
be kept In custody in England for
longer than twenty-four hours, nor
could he be taken as a prisoner on
board a British ship sailing from a
British port.
Here was a dilemma. Davidson was
free as air-had he only known 1t.
But Murray was equal to the occasion.
Look here, Davidson" he said, "Pve
got you safe. There Is only the last
stage of the journey to complete. If
I allow you to travel saloon with me
as an ordinary first class passenger
will you give me your word to play
me no tricks?"
To this proposition Davidson, know
ing nothing of the real state OF affairs,
was naturally quite ready to agree.
And so 1t came to pass that n of the
most notorious criminals Canada has
ever known came home in state; Free,
yet not free, a voluntary prisoner, and
yet an involuntary one.-Pearson's
Weekly.