The Washington herald., 1910-01-25
Supreme Court of the United States.

wade Mills, al Detroit, Mich. Malcolm b. Mich I
olson. II Council Grove. Kans. Arson W. Prescott /
Of Salem, Greg. L. r. H. Bats Of New York !,
City; Charles Harris Duscomb, Of New York City; !
Read GsTdon DiwOTth. q New York CITY, Charles 1
Cummings Collins. of ST. Louis, No.. James W. /
BelG. Of Washington, ID. C.; Henry g Thomas /
Of Washington. d. C.: Gay J. Ray. Of New Or |
leans La, Harry p. sneed Of Neg Orleans, La. /
Clifford b. Allen. Of 81. Louis. Mo; c. Louis /
Weeks u Minneapolis MINI. Edmund Il. King q /
sandusky. Ohio; Epa Hunton IT,, q Richmond. !
Va and Thomas T. Gatta, Of Hannibal. Mo- we're
admitted TO practice
No go Frederick J. Lowrey. ct al trustees &e..
appellants We The Territory Of Hawaii; appeal I
from tie supreme Court Of the Territory Of
Hawaii decree reversed with costs and cause 70
handed with drcctiCJs 20 enter judgment FOR ap- /
pellant5 as prayed for. Opinion By AIr. Justice
McKenus. (Alr Justice Brewer took no part IN the
decision Of tits case.l
No g. solomon r. Wagg appellant, Mary
r. Herbert ct al. appeal from the supreme Court
Ct the Territory Of Oklahoma decree affirmed with
costs and cause remanded 10 the Supreme Court (
Of the State II Oklahoma. Opinion b. Mr. Justice
Brewer.
No d. Old Nick Williams Cdnrany. petitioner.
IS. The United States; writ Of certiOIar 10 the
United States CiTCut Court C APPEALS Tor the
Forrth circuit; judgment affirmed and cause re-
mandcd 10 the District Court q the United States
for the Western district q North Carolina. Opinion
ly SIR. Chief Justice Fuller.
The Chief Justice announced that the court vii
take recess from Monday. January 81 TO Mon
dag. February q.
The Chief Justice also announced the following
orders # the court:
No. III Bucks stove and Range Company. sp-
pellant, VS.. The American Federation q Labor
g al.
Ne. SIS Samuel Gcmpers Ct al. petitioners, vs.
The Bucks Stove and Range Company and
No. 70. The American Federation Il Labor e
al. appellants. Tie Bucks stove ard Range
COMPANY; motion 20 consolidate granted, and the
cause assigned 20 he heard ca the first Tuesday d
the next term October IL, after the cases already
assigned tor that day.
No. 6is. Commercial Unicn Assurance Company.
Limited. # London. England, petitioner. vs. Rich
UOld Coal Company petition for Wnt q Ger
tioTzH 10 the United States Crcut Court Of APP
Ieas for the Ninth cirCIit denied.
/ No ~ Fries Bfesln Company petitioner rs.
William Bergan q al; petition for 4 wit Il err
( tiarau 20 the United States Circuit Court Of AD-
/ Isals for the Third circuit denied.
/ No, rs. Thomas Franklin. plaintiff IN error, vs.
/ The United states; motion 20 admit plaintiff u
aICr 10 bail pending the determination Of tie STlt
u cTT0r granted and lie VIII be admitted 10 bali
upon giving bond in the penal sim Of $1,000. con
diti1ned according % law and approved hy the Dis
trict judge fCr The Southern district q New No-k-
I No. s. Otis ". Kenyon. plaintiff il error. vs.
/ Albert T. Fowler, as receiver Of Tire American
National Bank Il Syracuse: il error 10 tie United
| States Circuit Cont e Appeals for the Second
circuit. Pr Clram. Judgment affirmed with costs.
I ard cause rlmaude3 % the Circuit Court q the
/ United >tates foT tie northern district q New
York Keys1r IS. Htz. lG L. g, Is. tmn IS.
/ BTOzn, Ia L. =. &c Richmond V. Irons, u {.
s.. z Matteson VS.. Dent I'6 L. ), 81 Opinion
below, is Fed. Rep. lT.
No. g. y. Nayo Deer plaintif in error vs. The
City q Melr1-e, n error 20 the Superior Court
Of the State II 8Iassaclusetts Pr clram: Judg-
Leut affirmed with costs. Hiberuia savings So
Us Aubrey. - L. s.. -, Railroad Company IS
PIistaa, ls Wall 3, case below. Dyer Mel
rcse, &c Mass. g.
40. g. Maria Berger, plaintiff in error. IS. VIII
Tracey q al. trustees. &c iH erTJ- 20 the su-
QIeme CcUT- of the state q Iowa Per c-riau.
Writ q error dismissed for the want q lUrisdic-
ton Castillo vs. Mcl1uLIc1. l68 1. =, 81 No
Fadenl question sE-stcd pricr 20 petition for
VIII r fUT case t.lgW. I35 IJW3,-59-
No sss The Uited states. plaintiff in error.
IS. Charles ;. Sargent; Id error 10 the United
States C.r"rit Cont Z APPEALS for the Eighth
district. DISMISSED srd mandate granted, On mo-
rian Il 1lr solicitor General Bowers for the plain
tiff il eH0T.
No. 81. The United States vs. Tic Terminal
Railroad Association u 81 Lolis Ct al motion
20 dismiss submitted Or Nlr. Solicitor General
Bowers for the United states.
No. .is. The United States petitioner vs.. J.
r simon d Co.. petition for a writ q Ger
tioTGgi % the United States Circuit Court 4 ATp
poals for the Second circuit submitted by Mr.
Solicitor General Bowers and Mr. Assistant Att0T
hey General Lloyd, Tor the petitioner. and By MIR
Howard 7. Walden, Mr. Henry ]. Webster, aHd
Air ". Nickhsm, for the respondents.
No. 1f9 Tie United states, petitioner IS. Leo
pod BaricI; petition for wit q cer1i1!sri Z;
the United States Circuit Court a Appeals fl
The Second circuit submitted by Mr. solicitor Gen
cral Bowers and Mr.. Assistant Attorney Genera
Lloyd i-r the petitioner and by Mr.. Albert II
. NashblU, for the respondent.
No. 20. Fred Anderson. plaintiff In error rs
. The United States. II JrrUr o. the District CCur
q The United states fer the District Of Minnesota
dockstei and dismissed. motion Il M S5licitG
General B0wers. t0T the ddeEdaut IN error. al,
mandate granted.
No. s9s. Buck stove and Range Company Ct al
plaintiffs In eUyT IS. &. &. lICEsTs e a., motto.
90 dismiss CT affirm submitted lg Mr. ?. 7. Camp
he'll. NJ stephen H. Allen. and Alr. Robert stone
FOR the defendants II uTur, IN support Of tie mo
ton, ard ~ Mr. Seneca y. Taylor. Tor tie plaintiff
IN error. il opposition thereto.
/ No 80 Henry &. Thowas. petitioner. vs.. Flor
ence Hunt De Winner e al. petition t-r Wi
Of certorsri 10 the court Of Appcsis Of DE DistTc
q Columbia submitted By Mr. Conrad II. SYM
and Mr.. J. W BsIlsr. fsr the petitioner aud b.
Mr.. 7. II. Marshall. f1r The respondent.
No ~. Stella T. Flut. as general guardian
&c. appellant rs. Stone Tracy Company e. a.
! motion % advance submitted by Mr.. Maxwell
. Eyarts. for the appellant.
No 7i5. Virginia Passenger ard Power C-mpau
et al, petitioners vs. Lane Brothers Company
petition Tor writ 4 crr-iCTaU 10 the United safe
Circuit Court Of Appeals fer the Fourth circuit
I II
Henry W Anderson. fer the petitioners. and b.
+. ! Mr.. Thomas :. Martin or the respondents.
No rs The Commissioners Of Lincoln PARK
! petitioner y. WestrUmits Company q America
petition for wit Of crtigrari 70 the Uuirei
I States Circuit Court f Appeals for the Seventh
J circuit submitted by Ar. ELseue q. Mason and Mr
, William Il. RummlCr. for tie petitioner. and b
Mr. Walter H. Caambe-lin, fcr the respondent
NCS. l06 and l0-. Hawaiian Trust Company, Ldm
S tied, ct al executors. vs. Heinrich Martens ven Hol
let al ..T 'srfp frrfz+
enc Of the 8pIellees herein suggested and the ap
IeaTauee. Of ALERT y Campbell. his Successor Il
cfice- as party appellee Lerciu, filed and entsTe
: Der srIs@ton OF counsel, and GA motion q Mr.. A
( B. Browne. for the appellants
No. az. Stella Z. Flint as general guardian. &c.
{ appellant, The stone Tracy Company e al
motion for leave % the United States % file brie
\ and make oral argument herein, submitted by Nj
> Solicitor General Bowers. in that behalf
! No. Original tx uaTte. In the matter u Ar
, thur Hewe;t and Tom A. Heating petitioners; mo
ton for leave 70 file Petition for a writ Of habea
corpus submitted by Mr.. Thomas T. Cats, for ia
, petitioners. with leave 10 Mr.. Solicitor Genera
Bowers 10 file brief in opposition within three day:
1 Ne. N9. 7. VI. Stauclift e. al. &c. appellants
rs, Charlie Fox ct al. appeal from the United Gil
10 CUik Court Of Appeals for the Eighth circuit Dis
missed with costs. pursuant TO the tenth rule
No. sl01 laurel Hi Cemetery, plaintiff in eTros
rs City and County q San Francisco ct al arGl
ment continued by Mr. Thomas f. Haven. for n
/. plaintiff in erUr; b. Mr. Jesse II. Steinhart. 70
the defendants IN eTTCr. and concluded by Nj
Thomas z. Haven. for the plaintiff in crr0r.
No. lGl. Hatcher * Moore Lumber Company ct al
K petitioners rs. William II. Knight et al. arg
q ment commenced by Mr. 4. p Pui0 for the pet
t.cnoTs; continued by AIr " J. Cunningham. f.
: the respondents, and concluded by Mr. ~ p. Puit
d for the Ie.itiCHsls.
I Adjourned until to-day at u O'Clock
:; The day call FIR Tuesday, January .. viii be 9
O., follows; Ms lC2. Jos, lC4 rs, go, l66 land lO7
lO6 l0, III, and lE.
DISTRICT H0TRTC