The Alaska citizen., 1910-10-24
DO|NCS IN DISTRICT COURT

In the case of Val Diebold vs. Walter Cooley. the court on Tues day made his findings of fact and conclusions of law. Judgment by de ,aulI being rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The findings of fact re cite that on March S, 1909. the plain tp purchased from Sam Godfrey below, Portage creek. a tributary of the Little Delta. Following this the defendant raised a question as to he plaintiffs title and on June 20 1909, the plaintih relocated the ground. marked the boundaries and made a discovery. This relocation was recorded on September :. 1909 On January 1, 19lo the defendant attempted to locate the claim
 On Tuesday Carl Nordling, Oli Hoolie and John Stitt instituted li bel proceedings against the steam CT Tetlin, formerly the Roughneck which Is now lying in Pile Driver slough, 2S miles south of Fairbanks Tho Tetlin, owned by Captaln North way, started up river last fall with 2 load of supplies for trading posts, hut was stuck on bar and must remain there all winter Nordling the engineer. claims S2O0 is due him for his services performed on the boat Hoolie claims S2416O as mate and John Stitt claims he has coming to hlm $154.50 for services as fireman.
 On Monday the arguments were made before the court in the matter of the settlement recommended by the referee. J. E. Golfer in the case of Hanot vs. Pedro, which case was recently decided in favor of the plaintiff. the court holding that d partnership existed and ordering an accounting.
 "Tommy" Watson, who has been court crier for the past four years, continuously with the exception of one term, on Monday tendered his resignation, 10 take effect Saturday Mir. Watson is embarliing in the mining game on No. 22 Goldstream,
 n, I,,l fIll ed down an opinion in the cae of Harry Cribb Vs. J. Harron Caskey, a suit m regard to d mechanics lien, taken by the plaintiff against the Riverside building. Judfment was rcn&ered in favor of the defen- dant The full opinion is to be found ir another column of this is sue
 In the case of the First National Bank vs. John l.. 1immins. Henry Roden and David Cascaden, an op- inion was rendered by Judge Over field on Monday. which finds in favor of the plaintiff, holding that the conveyance of the property in question from Timnins 10 Cascaden. was subject to the equities of the plain tiff The property involved is the building on Front street now occu- pied by Huey & Hyland's photo graphic establishment This was optioned on September 3, 1907. by Charles E. Jones to John L. Tim mins and Henry Roden, for the sum of s4,5O0, of which s2,0oo was paid down and the balance made pay able in March. 1908. When this bal bank. through Sam Bonnifield, ad vanced the money iE consideration of the deeding over of the property. It was to foreclose this deed. con- sidered as a mortgage. that the ac- tiCn was brought The assignee, Cascaden. claims that when Tim mins assigned his interest in the propert. to him he had no knowl- edge O. the transaction with the bank
 Suit was on Wednesday filed by Hilma Nerson against her husband, Frank Iverson, for divorce, wilful desertion being the grounds alleg- ed The complaint recires that the couple were married in Seattle on July g, 1892. and that there has been no issue to the union. Frank |