The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1910-03-02
HITCH OVER The Aids CASE
>HiIL >ENITOE> TE>IIII IND
~ ~ BI ~ pas
Ia OFT lee I'ui the re" IN"k insurgents sH
THE ~'HnsI IDa'i> nuI's That ThrS
NaN he NIInr.>'-> sn'I .IU'ls''~ - W"ii
Matte Nat s"IiIrh H. ~snal, .

Matte Nat S"IiIrh L. ~"HaI,
~ ,>y N."'nl N'.' ,l-v"'tuS mo-'
a. ih.. la, ',.rli. gr'.'.'., .. stat, Sst.ll.
,u'uruIt '.... ~ '.,,' wuul o., O." Low h~idg..
,u,ut.iI,,,. ,tt ar..,.i ru.i,r la. II. v,l.n,I
agreement ,r,r.I..'Il"I S.'uatui Lothian T.
Nn.i~ No. 30, y,uu h,.',rr ~. ~ iouiunpeni
~ tH' 'rIl 'u..lI" sW.trhr-l tack To- $40.
.uuf..-..u,,. - 'H. iu.r.r..rut SENATORS At
In.. rIut.l len Evck ga LduIary Z last t.
H'ri "ut ltI-t what senator Bonn ConGer
- about >.utiur NlLi-
'ug.'n. \ I-,ud,u. icrm.t i,.-I resident
Hu' (, u"ral Iuaur yer " the GIui un DTislR,
t,mI.Iry hti -'vcrr oyerhauling on
'hy ~'tui Iplr,,' Tor Aids wanted "a
'"uw through l.audon that thu bridge
'"muou q. l,OSe ! after the affairs oi each
C'p'au, ~ IN" bridge building combine
with S"'lu'iS ear, aud saw u u That the
Su,c"-~Gul bidder disided a sum amount
us - - I"'r cent. above the actual cost of
'h' work. witt IA" unSuCce~sful lad ier-
r,uusrl tor Alld- iiU,,st..d that through
the" and other Illegal devices ~; ~.
hrdg" companies the d-t"nc- world at
tempt =" prove that "a gang OF men seek
irg IA" rlthy gains Ut their corruption
funds were actually the in-tigators ans.
NV wv NitNitlls VI ttfTultion.
Then with a sudden turn Lewis v. Carr.
az counsel for Aids. announced that the
detrnc" intsndet 10 ralI all the insureent
SeuatorS who took Fart IN the coufsrencs
at a." Ten tyck when Beun Conger fret
mad. the charge OF briberv against S.,n-
RtOr Aids The trial was al ruptIy td.
lournei for the day tn let the Senate de-
tsrmIne whether Senators could he wit
ns~-es and ais" judges IN the case.
senator Harvey D. Hinman Of mnG
hamton was ON the stand ready to
testify. senator Hinman addressed the
senate committee from the stand and
demanded To know II his testimony would
disqualify him from serving 49, Judge.
wrangle or Senators followed aud
SENATOR Grady suggested that IL would
he we'll 10 ind out first just what the
SENATORS were going To testify Ia before
the question a. to their subsequent quail
hcations 90 serve As judges was deter
mined.
This suggestion was adopted and the
senate will know by tomorrow morning
II the insureent senator's csn be 90 He'd on
In addition to senator longer and Sen
atOT Human. the Senators who bottled
the caucus which elected Allds president
pro tenn and heard Bonn Cong.T's chsrge-
are Senators Edgar T. Brackstt of
sara,oga. John n. Rose " Newburgh.
John y Cordts IT kingston. Gsorge
" Agnew of New York AMI Frederick
". Davenport 81 clinton They all
declared after the trial adjourned to-day
that n the defence wanted them 20 60
IN the stand and swear as to Just what
Henn Conger Haid about Allds they would
: gladly do - providing their rights to
at in Judgment On the accused senator
we're not Jeoparled
u waStoWard the close Ut the dav when
Dir. Carr submitted to the senate th.
question IT calling certain of their own
members TO the stand. lie sid that
ne had looked long for precedsnts. recog-
nizing the seriousness OF the principle
involved He said that counsel had
h-en reluctant 10 suggest such a move
hr after mature deiib-TatIon hai DECIDED
that their client senator Aida. was en-
Iulsd ~ any nensiit that might accrue
from IA" testimony "f these witnesses
although the testimony they offered mi ght
disqualIfy them from acting or con
tn'Iing ~ tie Ca-- any longer - Judges.
In lo"Aing up IN" matter hs hPd found
that m m" Impeachment pr", ssdings
against President ANDREW johnson. Ron
Iam'n Wade. who would hay" ~uc"~ed.-,i
hins IA c'r,a,n contingencies. mad par
tHrpats~i ~ 'Ns trial =, rs~ - the
Legislature 1T the State Wa .,pursrned
b" -liid b" bad G"Ind u" prsCpd.nts.
I'D vnI ,nt-l,d fo call all tn. Sena ora
Who atr'..id..,l the I"i Eyck cunf.r-ncs.-
Asked senator Da,I-
-N"- rnsw-r-si Mr. Carr
senator H-arlystt addressed the Cnatr
and oppressed wrlilrgn"S- - waive any
ugAj- IT, thought that tho other
S"rst..r- f-.f a. b" It'd. .lthnugh the
question might ~. raI-.-i that be,-pIn ug
witnesses would di-uuahfy them. n that
Wa So Do" aid. tho defence might dir
qualify nll rH- Judges hy "rIiink the
S"a. ''r- - ~ltue--"s 'u me point or
atuther
--'tst.r B~rrkst' rad evidently h..en
Ui..,iug -~.-tr''h go pra, ..,lsui- aI.o
'". b.. ,.f.-i the 90" II the People We
prr"y 41'l y ). IN which Do" tourt ~
Npp'a'- n"Id r'at . Juror might ~" rall~,i
O.. % Nrt.''-- End rhr I,r' ,I.t h.. lest h.,i
'irt T..' - -nrs'lfv hinI
H. thi- o.. go 'r" Court 81 Nppesls ro-
'i"a"' ''.' ui-..rv II quest CONS such A.
o. 80. co.,! sent ra"S o." 'h.,a-.s ~ Lrrd
~f.A 81 ..r rh. I.irl 80 ~. rkla-n.ld.
''.irS' ,'.-"r- Nhu we're tried hef"rs tn.
.u-" ~ i.pri- m"rIi..'- ~ which body
r,f "ulN '"- iis-i 'i their trials iut suit
~''ilI"ir'lv r"yi'.Woi iu.' testimony acttug
rufT"~ ~II'~s-I'"u Iv VI Dsl,rTne got
a." r"g'r' .1 t'rs ',-" End r"ad "Ncerpt-
~-rs'." ltt'I- then announced ms
-, I-i"u H.' held that any n-Tnb~r of
'r- ~"n't" ~ a ""nJ,-t'-nt wit;i"~- and by
-''"uIng = VItn.~- and t~stifyinR he docs
r"t ir-'pIalfv himself from pd--ing ~
49,. ,@.s.
senator Hinnan Na- then called tu III"
-taud and sad that he did mot wish ?"
iIsIIahfy himself We suggested the
ur"prI"tv ~ appealing from th.. dscision