The Washington herald. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1906-1939, 1910-10-18
DAILY COURT RECORD

CNIondHy, October IT, 1900

Supreme Court of the United States.
Present: Mir. Justice HaTln. Mr. Justice White
Mr.. Justice McEtnHa Mr.. Justice Holmes, Mr.
Justice Day. M. Justice Lurton, snd Air. Justice
Hughes.
Charles ". Logan Of PiueyilIe. Ky. Anthony J.
Ross, q New Orleans, La George +. Shaw. u
Pittsburs. Pa Thomas Armstrong;. ir-, Of Phoeniz,
Ariz; Samuel McCay Of Pirtsburg Pa. Fled ".
Weitzsl. Of LudioW, by: Harold Harrer. 81 New
York CITY George L. Wilson. 81 Boston, Mas .
Edward h. Lstchworth Of Buffalo. \. y, and r.
Il. Dawes OF Clay Center, kans., were admitted %
practice.
NJ. Il. The United States. appellant Vs. The
Chicago, Milwaukee and -. Paul Railway Company;
appeal trom the United States Circuit Court Of Ap
peas for tie Eighth eiuuit, degee affirmed and
cause remaadel % tie OIreuiJ Court Of the United
States tCr the Northern district o. lowe. Opinion
b. SIR. Justice Harlan.
Mr.. Justice Harlan announced the following orders
o. tie court:
No. lss. October Term. Ioa J. Alexander ClIss
PLAINTIFF IN cu0r. Is Tie Chesapeake and ohio
Railway Company motion Tor leave 90 present "a
petition fcr reh5arirg denied.
No. Original. IA Iarye: In the matter Of
Patrick Lancer petitioner, motion for leave % dio
petition Tor wit of msEiamgs denied.
No. Is. Original FIX IaTle. In the matter Of the
Eastern Cuerokoes. petitioners motion Tor leave %
n.e petition Tor Wit az maud4ms granted and
rule 10 show cause ordered Ttiumblc December D
next.
30. 42. In the matter If the petition Of H. II.
Loving. trustee. motion % advance denied.
No so. Isaac a. Maus1ur appellant vs.. The
United States motion o. advance denied.
NO. zee stuart Linisey appellant VS.. Natural
Grbouic Gas Company Ct al motion % advance
granted and cause assigned Tor argument Monday.
Noycn-uer - after the eases already assigned for
that day.
No SOL. Salvatore l. Rocca plaintiff in e-7or vs..
George r. Thompson motion D. advance granted
and cause assigned for argument on Monday De
eenaer next. sft5r he eases already Assigned for
thst day.
No. 591. r. J. House. plaintiff in error. ys. Joel
b HAYES, marshal Sc. ct al. and
No Ia Thomas J. BraalHax e. al. Plaintiffs IN
error, vs., Tho state u Missouri, motion 90 advance
granted, and causes assigned tlT argument I'd Mon
dag. December next, after the cases already as
signed Tor that day.
No ga. The Sac and Fox Indians Of the 8iissiz-
sTIl Do Iowa, appellants. vs.. The Sac and Fox In
dlGHs q The Mississippi in Oklahoma and The
United States; motion % advance granted and cause
assigned f7T argument on Monday. December
next after the cases already assigned fF That dag.
No 5o- Bartlett Richards. petitioner, IS. The
United States -rlIri0l for a VIII " caTti1r3ri %
;he United States Circuit Court q Appeals iar the
Eighth circuit denied.
No. SOS. VIII G.. Comstock. petitioner vs. The
United States. petition for g ETlt q csrtorsr %
the United States Circuit Court Of Appeals for the
Eigth circUlt denied.
No. 56i Charles c. Jameson. petition. IS. The
United States petition for writ Cf certorari 20
Che United States Circuit Court 4 Appeals Tor the
Eighth circuit denied
~. 555. AcIunla Trirlett. petitioner. vs. The
United States, petition for a writ Of cert1rsr 10
he United States Circuit Court Of Appeals for the
Eighth circuit denied.
No. 70 Lon d. Mars petitioner vs. IdelIa En-
rick petition for writ 4 csEticrari 10 the United
states Circuit Court Of Appeals fog the Fifth cir
cllt denied.
80 $50 Jacob Gold. petitlone-. vs.. The South
side Trust Company. Trustee. &c. petition for
VIII q ceTtioar % the United States Circuit Court
o. AFpsals for tie Third ercnit denied.
No. go The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Com
iany, petitioner, vs., Edward Winters; petition for
wit u certi0rad % the United states Circuit
Court o. Appeals for the Sixth circuit denied
No. 81. The Rosario Mining and Milling Com
TenF, eorporution, petitioner VS. Charles ". CLARK;
petition tcr wiz Of c7Tti0ui 70 the United States
Crcat Court Of Appeals Tor the Ninth circuit de
MED
No. GO. Ma1 D. Grace. petitioner. vs.. Charles
g birmingham 20 al, trustees, petition for a writ
q cerugraTl % The United States Circuit Court az
Appeals for the Second circuit denied
No. 100. William dalton Mann az a.. petition
eTs - samuel bempsteri petition for a writ Il
ceTtieIaH U the United States Circuit Cent Of
Appeals for the Second circuit denied.
No. aA Herbert s. Hadlsy e. a., petitioners vs
arthur g Huidekoperi petition for a writ Of GER
uoTan 70 the United States Circuit Court Of Ap-
peals for the Eighth circuit granted.
No. 58l. Annie L1Vira. petitioner vs. William
Williams. Commissioner Of immigration; petition for
4 wit Of c7ru0ar 10 the United States Circuit
Court 1f Appeals foF the Second circuit granted.
r. ats,
Union Pacific Railroad Company; petition for a
wit q csri0au % the United states Circuit Court
a Appeals Ter the Eighth circuit granted.
No 81. Roz Elder Power and Light Clmuauy
plaintiff IN error. Us. Brigham City; motion 10 dis
miss or affirm postponed % the hearing Of the cause
on is merits
No. SO Margaret Kopp ct al. appellants vs..
Mara Waters. molten 90 dismiss postponed 20 the
hearing Of the cause its merits.
NJ. 5l@ Louisiana Navigation COMPANY Limited
plaintiff IN err0r VS. oyster Commission OF Louisiana
ct a.; motion 20 dismiss or affirm postponed 70 The
hearing q the cause On It's merits
10. ~, seahoard Air Line Railway Company
plaintiff IN error, SIS. Ernest y Duvau: motion 10
cause on its merits
No. 5i', The United States. appellant. rs. Tn.
i.1e..ts II'sl company, &c; motion % dismiss
or sinTm postponed 20 the hearing q the cause on
its merits
No SCI. Frank y HoTstot. appellant Is ps-
nard A Flood, detective Of police NJ the DIV
q New York appeal from The Circuit t'or-r NJ ne
United states i1r the southern district 4 New
York order affirmed with costs no further ,uipio,
will be- delivered Mr. Justice Hrrba. fiB r.t
participate in the consideration or decision Of this
cascl
No. 70. The United states. petitioner PC Tis,r,
Co., petition Tor a writ Of eerti5rsri +, tbe
United States Circuit Court cf AnpeaIs frr tb.
Second Circuit submitted by Mr. Attorney General
Wickersham for the petitioner, and hy Mr. Arthur
NJ. King for the respondent. with leave 10 counsel
on both sides 70 file additional briefs on or before
Friday next
No. SIS. Walter J. Gregory. petitioner. rs the
District q Columbia petition for a writ Of Ger
uoraH 20 the Court u Appeals # the District n
Columbia submitted by Mr.. A s. Worthiueton for
the petitioner, and By Mr.. Edward IT, Thomas and
Mr. William Henry White for the respondent.
No $50 William B. Kraft petitioner vs. the
District Of Columbia; petition Tor writ q ceriiorar
70 the Court q Appeals q the District II Columbia
submitted by Mr. A. S. Worthingtun I'm behalf 81
Mr. Daniel W Baker and Mr. Frank ]. Hogan
for the petitioner, and by Mr.. Edward H Thomas
and Mr. William Henry White for the respondent.
No 7o3. Morris Engel, appellant, vs. Edward r.
O'Malley ct a. motion 10 advance submitted by
Mr.. Charles Dushkind for the appellant
No 7D. The Wabash Railroad Company Ct al
petitioners. vs. james Polltz petition fer q writ
q ceTtioFsr TO the United States Circuit Court
II Appeals for the Second Circuit submitted ey
Mr., LaWrencs Greer, Mr. Rush Taggart, and Mr.