The Mankato free press. [volume] (Mankato, Blue Earth County, Minn.) 1879-1924, 1910-11-04

District court for the November
term will convene on Wednesday, the
ninth. Judge A. r. Pfau, ST., will pre-
side. The calendar is as follows:
Rosa NJ. Harlins vs. Richard f. Har.
kins
j. f. Slower Va. r. L. Houk.
Joseph Dnrand vs. Simon Mckenzie.
Paul Brehm vs. Simon Mckenzie.
George Ogden vs. Simon Mckenzie,
Roderick Mckenzie vs. Simon Me-
Kenzie.
Agnes Coughlin vs. Thomas A. Sherk.
John l.. Shindler vs. Parker Carnival
ompany.
Adolph Zeugner vs. the Widell COM
pany.
Dodson Fisher & Co. vs. Chicago and
Northwestern Railway company.
w. Deuser as administrator of estate
of Pauline Leibrock, deceased, and w.
Deuser VS.. +. V. Waters and Emma
Walters.
Standard Brewing company VS. P. H.
Barnick. So
Kate Robb VS. William r. Hammett:
Roy II. Anderson, VS. Chicago Great
Western Railroad company and Big
Diamond Milling company.
William r. Lewis and w. S. Evans
IS William c. Williams.
Mary Elizabeth Culp, VS. Arthur Du-
lne Culp.
C. J. Laurisch VS. Frank s. Bragdon.
Farmer & Pau VS. Schroeder & o.
son. tffS.- ~ S
Augusta Duehring Administrative VS.
Chicago st. Paul Minneapolis and Om-
lha and L. Larson. is
David L. Schweickhard VS. William
Rein ct al. sAlre. E. a8sSs
Mary C. Balmes VS. Clarissa .Drury
ct al. aa&.<'
Mary Manderfeld VS. John f. Mander-
field Fi.s
German American State Bank of
Nankato, Mimi. corporation vs G. L.
Peterson 8 sse.s- ~
National Citizens Bank of Mankato,
Hinn. VS. Commander Mill company.
National Citizens Bank OF Mankato,
Ninn. VS. George Mckinley, G.. N. Son.
lesyn, and Brainerd Lumber and ..Mer-
camille company. 81
Ludwig Hanson VS. Hugh NJ Roberts.
+. f. Browder VS. Thomas G.. Clark.
National Citizens Bank of Mankato,
Mimi. VS. j. G. Byrnes and T. L. Byrnes
'opartners as Byrnes Bros.
Mary Hollmechel, ct nj vs. George
Schmidt, ct al.
Theodore Sewers VS. Charles Swanson.
Virginia Dixon VS. Ole Dixon,
George s. Hage and Charles c. Pettis
'o-Partners doing business under the
irm name and style of Hage & Pettis
$ Chicago, st. Paul, Minneapolis G.
'maha Railway company, corporation
md Great Northern Railway company,
In re Petition of Consumers Power
company for appointment of commits.
toners to appraise damages, etc.
Louise f. Moe vs Julius E. Moe.
Charles W. Morris vs. Henry c. Ander-
son.
Michael Holden, guardian ad Item
IS. Metropolitan Life Insurance COM
)any.
Nancy M. Wheelock VS. w. B. Red
urn and Margaret his wife and p. F.
Dewitt.
In the matter of the adoption OF
ALA Harrington by Ray G. and Lettie
Y. Anderson.
James Bryson VS. heirs of David
Thompson ct al
Hulda Baumgardner vs. William
3aumgardner.
Thomas Penhale VS. Matilda Penhale.
Maria Dunn VS.. William j. Dunn
Anna Aldo VS. Chicago and North
western Railway company.
A. F. Strunk ct al vs. Judson Con.
rete Manufacturing company ct al.
First National bank, Minnesota, vs.
AarOn +. Schmitt.
Several important cases will be for
rial. Probably the most important
md one that will attract the most at
ention is the case of Agnes Coughaln
gainst Thomas A. Sherk. The plaintiff
sues to recover large sum, alleging
breach of promise. There are several
'ctions for divorce and number of
'uits for alleged personal damages.