The Sauk Centre herald. (Sauk Centre, Stearns County, Minn.) 1886-current, 1910-09-22

tricts and its pauperism. The country
town has no slums. and every one is
self supporting. The red light and
criminal districts of the cities are un-
lice force and the criminal courts of
the city are unnecessary, and the
| money which these would cost can be
used to plant trees and build side
walks.
The cities are crowded almost to the
limit of human endurance. The coun
try town has less room than the coun
try itself. but still there is plenty for
every one The cost of food that is so
alarming to the city dweller is more
or less of joke to the resident of the
country town He has a garden In his
back yard and COW in neighboring
pasture. The cost of living may have
affected his ability to purchase lux
uries. but he will always have plenty
to eat.
The country town has distinctive
place to fill in the development of the
country. Some people would do away
with the country town altogether and
let all the farmers business be done
in the cities. Others would have the
farmer patronize his home merchant at
whatever cost. An average between
these ideas will represent the attitude
of the majority of the farmers toward
the country town. To centralize all
r. 10 h,,c in, ho lor cit
would be an unwise policy. The tend
ency is rather in the other direction
The movement Of factories to smaller
towns where the employees can live
more comfortably is becoming general.
Decentralizing of the mercantile bust
ness must follow
The growth Of the mail order bust
ness has been regarded as spelling the
doom Of the country town. That the
mail order business has grown to its
present proportions is the fault of the
country retailer himself The country
town is essential to the prosperity of
the farmer. but the farmer is more
essential to the prosperity of the coun-
try town. If instead of appealing to
the sentiment of the farmer and trying
to cajole of brighten him into boycott
ing the mail order houses the country
merchant had handled the problem in
businesslike way there would have
been no mail order scare. In those
country towns where the Importance
Of the surrounding farmers is recog-
niZed and an attempt made to give the
farmer square deal there is little
complaint of mail order buying. 1t is
che merchants who treat the farmers
unfairly who are most ready to raise
the cry against the mail order houses.
In good many towns the farmer is
directly Disseminated against. The
stores maintain a delivery service for
their city patrons. The farmer goes
to the store for his goods. The city
man usually pays once month-some-
times not so often. The farmer nearly
always pays for his goods in cash or
produce. Yet both must pay the same
price. The farmer is helping to pay
the cost of a delivery system from
which he gets no benefit. He is help
Ing to pay the interest on credit ac-
counts and sometimes the accounts
themselves. If instead of working
desperately against anything that
bears the name of parcels post on the
ground that it will encourage mail or
der buying the merchant would turn
e and work foT a low rate parcels
post on the rural routes he would eff
fectually curb any tendency the COM
munity might have toward mail order
buying If he would deliver certain
classes of goods to the farmers by
such a parcels post he would be Civ
ing them no more than square deal.
Another way in which the merchants