The Detroit times., 1910-10-05

\ mend that said assessment be reduced
4 from $4,000 20 $500.
Re petition OF Adam Brandu. we ind
was levied against him for the year 1910
upon statement nled with the Board or
Assessors: that In making out said state
msps Psdsonere insd ,sas ~ ane sstoo and
your Committee being satisfied that an
error was made recommend that said as
sessment be reduced from 1850 to w.
! $50.
Re petition OF Michigan Lumber Yard
we find that "A personal assessment OF
| $4,000 was levied against said peu-
TONER for 1910 through failure on their
part to iile a statement with the AS
| SCISSORS within the time prescripeu pS
law. which is accounted for by the
fact that petitioners representatiss
was ont OF the city at the time tho
rolls were prepared. and an eNanina-
ton OF the books by the Assessors
prompts your Committee TO recommenu
Re petition OF Ralph Amesworth. we
| ind that "A personal assessment OF Ssvv
was levied against Inst craze s,S Il the aeard OF
1 Assessors; that In making OUT saio
statement she included therein noSss
hold goods 10 the value OF sSgo. , wn,cn
fore recommend that said assessment
be reduced from $500 to $500.
Re petition of Alva HUM. we mo
WAS levied against him for 1910 ON
statement filed with the assessors. that
petitioner AYERS that In making out
said statement. he committsa an ,ps
and upon submitting the matter 70 INC
Assessors for investi cation. said BOARD
recommends that said assessment %
reduced from $4,000 TO $1,000. whieh -
concurred in by your Committee.
Re petition OF Flora b. Coleman; We
ind that a personal assessment OF Sio,-
500 was levied against BIER In the Sec
1
$40. 500 In the Ninth ward, the latter
covering 50, 500 In mortgages ana sLVoo
| for an automobile. The Assessors &C.
knowledging the mortsage sss ,ha, ,hs
| 10 be double, we recommend thAt tne
| assessment levied against her IN 'ne
Ninth ward be reduced from sio'soo 10
Re petition OF r. S. Taylor, we and
that q personal assessment or sl.zoV
was levied against him for lsl0 upon
statement hled with the Assessors, that
said statement he made a clerical error
that the error was made. recommeno
that said assessment be reduced from
re petition Of u. s. Cap Mfg. Co. we
nnd that through a clerical error upon
the part OF the Board OF Assessors an
item OF S3.7oo was carried torwasu -"
the books as So 900 the error meins,
acknowledged. said Board recommends
that said assessment be reduced from
$4,000 to 1880 which recommends
ton is concurred In oy your So"-
mittee.
Re petition of David ]. Boyer. we
find that q personal assessment or Wv
was levied against MN TOT i ,he, ne
tititoner Is and has meen a residen' OF
Crosse Pointe Farms. and SO being. We
recommend that the taxes que on Sa''
assessment be cancelled. .
Re petition OF George Bouteii. we nnu
that personal assessment OF $&oo was
levied against him for 1910 upon state
/ a .l.A h. ~
titioner in making out said statement
failed to include therein an onset OF
81. 500, and your COMMITTEES being satis-
fed that he Is entitled to the onset
recommend that the assessment be
Re petition of Frank NJ. Brown. we
find that a personal assessment ,Sa
Sixteenth ward as administrators or the
estate of Minnie Seaman and that q
like assessment was levied assinst
John F. Newman, executor OF said es-
tate in the Fourteenth ward. The AS
SCISSORS acknowledging this TO pc a
double assessment recommend that the
Fourteenth ward assessment be can
celled. which recommendation IL con-
Cured in by your Committee.
Re petition of Mary F. Davidson
wm MsGosnIe3 we 900 , @s. i. pssa
against her for 1910, which personal
property IL included In the statement
Of c. A. Davidson. and ,your Commit,
that this Is a double assessment, rec
ommend the calculation Of same
Re petition OF Grace E. chafhn. we
find that a personal assessment or $4oV
was levied against her for 1910 upon
cash In bank: that petitioner In Sep
TENDER, 1909. withdrew the FUNDS ana
known as 2ia Westminster avenue. The
papers being offered In evidence to SUB.
stantiate Ter claim. we recommend that
said assessment be cancelled.
tns. ~ ~ WflmaTfh
by l. D. Harris. Ex. we md that q
levied against the executor or said es-
closed Dec. 81. 1909: that the Assessors
acknowledge this to be an error In as
sossing and ask 10 have same cancelled.
which IL concurred In by your Com
Re petition Of J. s. Hamilton for
cancellation Of assessment against
Louis Drug Co. we and that a personal
Hamilton at 207o Fort street west and
also q personal assessment OF $1,000
against Lois Drug Co. located at 2072
that this Is a double assessment. and
the Assessors being satisfied thereof.
recommend that the assessment levied
Re petition of Mathew Markey. we
nnd that q personal assessment Of 5000
was levied against petitioner for 1910
through a clerical error upon the part
acknowledged We recommend that said
| assessment be cancelled.
Re petition OF Charles Goldstone, We
| find that personal assessment OF
81. 900 was levied against him for 1910
/ and that q personal assessment or 800
was levied against Mrs. Collisions Tor
same year; that petitioner 10 not en-
gagged In any business and has no per-
sonal property and therefore asks that
| the assessment levied against him for
| 1910 be cancelled. and the Committee
being satisfied that this Is double as,
sessment. recommend that the personal
assessment levied against petitioner be
cancelled.
Re petition OF Ernest A. Schultz. we
| ind that a personal assessment OF $500
land contract, which land contract your
petitioner sold I'm April last and IN
| vested the proceeds In other property.
! upon which petitioner has paid tho
taxes. Your Committee being satisned
thereof. recommend that said assess
Re petition OF Market Woodenware
Co. tby Jos. A. Zechman), we IND that
personal assessment OF 1850 was
levied against said company FOR lsi0'
that said company dissolved ana dis
continued business In October. 1905.
business In the Fifteenth ward from
which latter location he hled state
ment. said assessment being ac-
knowledged TO be erroneous. we rec
ommend that the same be cancelled;
| Re petition OF Julius Kahn, we nnd
that a personal assessment OF $1,000
was levied against him upon statement
fled from SO Delaware avenue and In
addition thereto a personal assessment
OF $4,000 from his office In the owen
fed that this IL a double assessment:
/ recommend that the assessment levied