The Detroit times. [volume] (Detroit, Mich.) 1903-1920, 1910-10-12
||0h COUNCIL


fc.n11nens1 fsoa Dass ~
| n1oory Jordan. Hoban Bros, Sol
~ II. Brace and George II
~ Tor the canceIiAtion. REDUCTION
1n1ement Of certain general city
rSet RESPECTFULLY report that We
~ the same under consideration
~ NSkrn6A 70 the statements Of each
80 af0rosaid petitioners. ana AFTER
10ISatlon With the Assessors. pes
80 q submit the Following detailed
~ EDITION Of James Gilmore. we find
~ 63fitioner r. the owner or lot "
~ rs. Atkinson n Hicks SUB, etc,
80 on the .. s. OF Twelfth street
< s>,fffioner ayers that the assess
- fSvfed against house located on saio
~ 9rorbitant and upon submitting the
- 10 the Assessors. said Board rec
oon6n that the assessment on puiiu,
~ reduced $500. when u
4 - pefftSon OF VIM. Feusch. we md
nofifioner II the owner or lot ! OF
1ncf = Bouder's SUBJ. etc. situate on
north side OF Berlin street. tnat psa,,
- avefs that the assessment levied
{rr1116inw Il grossly excessive. and upon
1S1ffinS the matter to the Assessors
lnvoaf10a ton. said Board recommends
ne assessment on building be re-
"a $500, which 10 concurred IN ~
X a petition OF Jacob Merits. we ind
refitione~ In the owner or lot %
~ -. FOSTERS sub, situate on the y >.
IN. Grand Boulevard, between JOS
>1non ana Mitchell avenues: that PET.
- - cosnplains Of the assessment levied
Y 6utlding for 1910. and upon submit
|0x the matter to the Assessors, Saiu
IRA recommends q reduction OF WV
5oh IL concurred In by your COM
~ petition of r. ID. Mccormick. We
NJ that petitioner 10 the owner or iot
az peVttt II. Taylor's SUBJ. ETC., STU
- an the IN q OF Taylor avenue; tnas
I1kioner claims that ouiiding II asssssso
q high, and upon submitting the mat
ID "a the Assessors. said Board recon-
1n6s that the valuation on building De
5171cod 81 900. which II concurred In by
"A pstition OF J. c. Ruttman, we find
- = personal assessment OF $1,000 WAS
I01oA AGAINST petitioner on automopie
~ pot{tionor avefN that said auto ID
worth 70 exceed $500, and your com
Itoo being satisfied. recommends re-
S661on from 1000 20 $500.
~ nefition Of Chas. H. Werner d
- to. We fnu that through an err
uotitionerD paid the taxes on =
|6et&aGe OF 1900 assessed against
<~q4r 6een srroneously collected. we
Sknsn6 : refund Of the amount
pstit3on Of chas Il. McGrssor,
~ md that 2 Psrsonel ssss s,,d nr o.
6oh Tor 1910: that while petitioner
n ~ owner Of said launch. IL 10
~ and has always been kept In 81
|4lr county. In which latter eou ,hS.
~ vcrffied by receipts. we recon-
TTH : refund OF the amount paid In
~ pstition Of Manufacturers Piano
691.0lO was levied against SAID
nSnny for 1910 through failure 70
4 = statement with the Board OF
@Dooeors: that upon supmitung the
|xf1or 20 the assessors for .lvestlRa-
-. said board recommends that
- Be reduced to $4,000. which rec
nbndation 10 concurrsd In by your
= pstition Of n. q. Merrill. We md
"a 4 perponal assessment OF $500
~ levied against petitioner for 1910
{kn sworn statement hlsd with tne
|Doosors: that petitioner AYERS tnat
y wa made and II being manifest
6 rscommend a reduction In the A.
|7nnent OF $1,000.
- petition OF ID. q N. d. Cameron.
And that z persona ns,ns ss'e nstitioneps
a 1910 through failure TO nle state
M with the board OF assessors.
IoUing the value OF their assessaple
!egerty; that a upon .sDm .ssd board ard
61nmonds that said assessment pc
E11ced TO $4,000. which II the value
koir stock OF groceries. and wnicn
characterization n concurrsd In ~
y petition Of Maurice Frasier q Co,
- ara that n personal assessment or
'ssxo was levied against said nr,n
"a 1910 upon statement nleo ws s
- assessors; that petitioners aver
- IN error was made In making out
VA statement by failing TO incluoe
I0reln an Onset OF Sl.ioo. ana your
nnnittee being satisned from an 81
61nation of the statement that an
III wac made. recommend tnAs saio
EASEMENT be reduced to 4l.o0o.
80 petition OF Walter G. Hartman.
, and that . double assessmsnt Vas
1 iss s At Is Edison ave-
~. for which no statement Wa nieo.
II An assessment OF 1850 from his
Ioo In the Psnobscot buiiding Tne
SSSmsuf was levied. recommend
I2f The taxes paid 1T his home be
1fundsd. which II oonourrsd In ~
cetision Of rlisabsth vincent. we
N tkat . personal assessment OF 500
= levied against her upon = stock
4 millinery located 1t $50 Kerchevai
@onus for 1910, for which eseeesment
tisnsr asss:d !: ysss m.tsr 70 IN:
1oGIorS, said board recommends That
~ Ssscssment be reduced TO e250
k7ch = concurrsd In BY your com
y netition Of Albert Fscht. we md
kT ( personai assessment of S1.4o0
~ Levied against petitioner - ed-
~1nfrntor OF the estate OF Pauline
n tor .is1o which ass . 9sn d sSas,,n
! 6ks Supreme Court We. therefore.
sSSnmsnd that same be cancelled.
- petition Of Knapp q Epiey, We
" that 3 personal assessment OF "
Was levied against said nrm TOT
"a upon sworn statement nled with
- sSssesors; that petitionerg aver
- n making out said statment an
e was made. and upon submitting
f19Stion. said board recommends 9
)tlction OF Sl.1oo. which - concurred
4 " your committee.
- pstition Of National Candy Com
<.3So was levied against said com
- for 1910 on statement Med with
80 Aososoors. which petitioners claim
q 1ronoly excessive. and upon SUD-
kting the matter 70 the Assessors
~ 9 porsonal inspection for the plant
<oWo that the assessed value OF the
'konlnery should have remained the
1Ulo - In 1909, viz: $4,000: that socn
f8rrange mant will make the personal
tSo0ment for 1910 SSS.ss0, TO which
Tier amount they recommended the
oooment BE- reduced, which recon-
l1odation - concurrsd IN BY your
= pstition Of chas. A. Ducharme.
end that . personal assessment or
ko1o was levied against him for 1910
~ 0fty shares of Old Detroit National
M stock. upon statement furnished
4 the bank; that petitioner ayers that
~ - and has been q resident OF Crosse
91nte Farms. since May. 1903, and that
~ taxes levied against him In the
~ Of Detroit are erroneous. Your
nnmfttee being satisfied that petit
nnor 70 = resident Of Gross Pointe
t1nn. recommend that the taxes due