The Detroit times., 1910-08-24
III. Osborn Wants a
Liability Law Drawn
In The Interest Of All
In the One He Proposes He Asks
For More Protection For the
Worker and More Proteo-
ton for the Workers
EMPLOYER.

III worker ana more roseo' Mr. Osborn declared that
III EMPOWER | under the present provision OF the
II statute rights Of the employe are
properly sagaded big lOOphc left for the crawling
away the employer from his part Of the blame
quickly seized by the political opponents
Mr. Osborn and was set before the employing the state in an
attempt to array them against Mr. Osborn.
number communicated with the candidate for an
rion Of his views first hand and expression given
the press Tuesday upon the employers
Of the state candidate in his position
Mr. Osborn evidences setting that he has looked
been studied from oNE
but from all angles and the broad interest
of not only employer employee the public well
| 81 Mr. 0sborn's position simply and plainly Is this:
THE LAW WE NOW HAVE HAS NOT ADVANCED IN STEP WITH
Invention AND PROGRESS SINCE TINE IT WAS WRITTEN
When could take Of and could not anticipate
he greatly conditions under which the wkngman OF today
kompeled to earn the bread and his family eat.
Dangerous machinery this laws time
Innovations building placing limb jeopardy have come
those who employed in the field
commerce
Exploration the multiplied the numbers
1.-The comparatively ono engaged in this pursuit
Death injury every carrying power
and . force
dangerous chemicals for which and common
found manufacturing and industrial science has pro-
creased
AND WHILE CHANGED CONDITIONS BROUGHT GREATER
RISK TOLL THE EMPLOYER PR0FITING BY HIS
LABoRsAvNG AND T1MEsAvNG DEVICE, HAS TAKEN ON MO-
ADDED RESPONSIBILITY WITH ITS INSTALLATION
presumption law that the workingman who
e injured or his life is ALL to blame
the possible Of that nterpreta
on employer held responsible for the ng
renee Of employee contributing the injury death Of another
instance point that section hand and I'm
engineer railroad should not be held fellow employees tor their
departments are separate responsibilities
However unmindu fogetful the rights Of
employer the protection him under revised and
snodernized ability law.
He is apprecv could be left open the
ys purse provision made that would call
the empoye vocation his Of the responsibility
He does forget law Ambulance chaser who the
constantly the heels Of the employer looking Tor his div ne
has good fortune to even squeeze out settlement
He is mindful lawyers who disgrace their profession
and whose pre the employee employer and in this
ton Is the broadne Osborn in his position set forth
the employer able replace with machinery Mr.
Osborn position that the entitled to be looked upon
h;rc valuable consideration machinery
The emuoyer insured he has carefully watched
because gone he will have get and will have to
PAY for It,
The unscruuous employer much about
get another WITHOUT COST
al Mr. Osborn automatic provision putting value
the value machine would be judged putting
liability upon employer which would prompt him to regard work
machine being Of value and protect him. that
ud prompt wokngman himself working ordcr
machine kept working order such Mr. Osborn
would and smack Of justice besides making
one employer and empoye saving litigation
putting the shyter out Of business and driving
pursuit which he would be useful society instead
burden upon it and a disgrace to it.