Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1910-12-05
THE COURTS
United States Supreme Court.

United States Supreme Court.
Present-Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr.. Justice
White. Mr.. Justice McKenna. Mr.. Justice
Holmes. Mr.. Justice Day. Mr.. Justice
Lurton and Mr.. Justice Hughes.
Charles B. Connolly of Philadelphia,
Pa; Edmund F. briggs of New York
city. Frank l.. Mulholland Of Toledo.
Ohio: David j. kenefick of Buffalo, N.
Y; Edwin w. Smith Of Pittsburg. Pa;
Edwin H. Cassels Of Chicago. ILL.,, and
Arthur D. Foster OF Baltimore, Nd, were
admitted to practice. 49,
No. is. Illinois Central Railroad Com
pany. plaintiff In error. agt. the common
wealth Of Kentucky in error to the
court Of appeals of the state OF Ken
lucky; Judgment affirmed with costs;
opinion by Mr.. Justice Hughes.
No. $50. The United States, plaintiff
in error. agt Fritz Augustus Heinze;i in
error to the circuit court of the United
States for the southern district of New
York; judgment reversed and cause re-
manded for further proceedings In con-
fOrmity with. the opinion Of this. court:
opinion by Mr.. Justice Mckenna.
No. 81. The United States, plaintiff
In error. agt. Fritz Augustus Heinze;
In error to the circuit court of the
United States for the southern district
cause remanded for further proceed
ings In conformity with the opinion Of
this court. Opinion by Mr.. Justice Nc
Kenna.
Mr.. Justice Harlan announced the fol-
lowing orders of the court:
No. POI. Ricardo Aguado, appellant,
agt. city of Manila: motion to advance
granted and case assigned for argu-
ment Monday, January 23 next, with
Nos. 5s and 81. as one case
No. $50. Fred Light, appellant, agt
the United States; motion to advance
granted, and cause assigned for argu-
ment Monday. January 2s next, after
the cases heretofore assigned for that
day.
No. 100: Christopher G. Wilson,
| plaintiff in error. agt. the United
Nos 80 and 7ss. Christopher c.
Wilson, appellant, agt. the. United
States; motion to advance granted, and
cases assigned to be heard after Nos.
258 and $50. 49,
No 49, Original The state Of Okla
homa, complainant, agt. the Atchison,
| Topeka and Santa Fee Railway Company;
| and
No. IA. Original. The state of okla
homa, complainant, agt the Atchfson, To-
| al; assigned for argument Monday. jan
| uary 10 next after the cases already as
| signed for that day.
a1 No. Na 2 st Garsn kn sas
al; petition Of the New York Carbonic
| Acid Gas Company for leave to file brief
herein granted, but motion of petitioner
| to argue orally denied. ..
| matter Of the Mallory Steamship Com
! pany. petitioner: motion for leave to file
| petition for a writ of prohibition denied.
No. - Original FIX parts In the
| ton for leave to file petition for writs Of
prohibition and mandamus denied,
| No. -: Original. Elk parte. In the
matter of Sobrinos de Ezquiaga, petition
! err; motion for leave to file petition for
writ of prohibition or mandamus denied.
| No. ia. John A. Ripper, petitioner,
agt. the United States; petition for a
writ Of certiorari to the United States
| circuit denied.
No 1917. Amanda C. Foster, petitioner,
agt Luciano r. Boulo. executrix, etc.
petition for a writ of certiorari to the
United States circuit court of appeals
| for the fifth circuit denied.
No. 1913. Frederick A. Hyde ct al. Pc
| titioners. agt. the United States: petition
for a writ of certiorari to the court of ap-
peals o. the District Of Columbia granted.
No. 8. Original. Elk parte. In the mat
ter of Athanasi Nicola. petitioner: petit
ton for, a writ of mandamus denied: rule
discharged and petition dismissed. on
authority of Tobin, petitioner. 214 T.. s.,
5O7
No II. Original. Elk parte. In the
matter Of the Cudahy Packing Company.
petitioner: petition for a writ of manda-
mus denied; rule discharged and petition
dismissed, on the authority of In re Penn
sylvania Company. petitioner. ETC.; 1877
U. S., 451.
No. 81. Mary r. Trimble ct al, plain
tiffs in error, .agt. Ida V. Klugh ct al:
in error to the circuit court of the United
States for the district of South Carolina;
dismissed for the want Of Jurisdiction. on
authority of Empire state. Idaho Mining
and Development Company agt. Hanley,
2OJ L. s., 225. go - =.
No. 90. Philadelphia and ReaoAng Rail-
way Company. plaintiff in error, ast. the
| United States: =
No. 1877. Colorado and Northwestern
| Railroad Company, plaintiff in error, agt.
the United States and
| No. 1877. Southern Railway Company,
plaintiff in error. agt. the United States:
motion to advance to be heard with No.
| So submitted by Mr.. Attorney General
| wickersham for the United States.
| No. IT'S. The Standard Oil Company Of
New York. petitioner, agt. the United
States: petition for writ Of certiorari to
the United States circuit court Of appeals
for the second circuit submitted by Mr..
D. j. Kenef1ck and Mr.. Martin Carey. for
the petitioner and Mr. Attorney Gem
Attorney General Kenyon. Mr.. 8. Wal
lace Dempsey and Mr.. Barton Corneau
for the respondent. -
| No. SOL. Salvatore L. Rocca, plaintiff
in error, agt. George F. Thompson: re-
assigned for argument on October 10,
191., on motion Of Mr.. Eustace Cullinan
in behalf of counsel for the plaintiff in
error. g.
No. 6s1. West Side Belt Railroad Com
pany ct al. plaintiffs in error. agt. Pitts
burg Construction Company; motion to
dismiss or affirm submitted by Mr. Samuel
McClay and Mr.. Edwin W. Smith for
the defendant in error in support OF the
motion, and by Mr.. Thomas Patterson. for
the plaintiff in error in opposition there
to. =. :,
No. $40. Roland F.. Quillin, claimant,
| etc, petitioner. agt. Atlantic Mutual In
surance Company; petition for q writ Of
certiorari to the United States circuit
| court Of appeals for the second circuit
submitted by Mr.. H. L. Cheyney for the
petitioner. and Mr.. Edmund L. Baylies
for the respondent. .l.&
No. 7S2. National Surety Company, pc
citioner, agt. Kansas City Hydraulic Press
Brick Company; petition for writ Of
eertiorari to the United States circuit
court Of appeals for the eighth circuit
submitted by Mr.. Frank Hagerman for
4 the petitioner. and by Mr.. James s. Bots
Il ford for the respondent
Il in error, agt. the Chicago City Railway
affirm submitted by Mr.. John p. Wilson
for the defendant In error In support OF
the motion. and by Mr.. Elijah II. Zoline
for the plaintiff in error in opposition
| No ~ wynsIOw Hart Reove second