The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1910-06-21

NV NNus AuNNNAM0uh uuf NAotA AA9NNNl
Iale haa consistently stood Tor manhooC
iirat and fOr learning only a. an Rdiunci
Of manhood This attitude permeatel the
whole university. becomes ingFaned n
the individual and IA transmitted by him
20 the business and social world. This
u SAID by sOnle to he the backbone Of
lale's greatness. TO-morrOw Hass sends
out a new embassy. Cited and eager u
symbOliRe her deals
A. the Yale Medical School graduation
exercises this afternoon the addresa y
} medicine WRA delivered by Prof VIII
IAN 7, Councilman. professor OF pathology
~ Harvard Medical School Hls conclud'
ing words we're
You viii hnd that iAe decoy Of dress DE-
pOSiment and words will ih the long run
avail yON but little. Your pTofessioN VII
demand Of you knowledge. skill and tactMl-
nees which comes only from tho sym
pathetic heart on mus, make up your
minds In the beginning that your lie 10
going 20 be aFduOus. that there are few
prizes: that even that degree % financial
Success whch will enable you 10 marry
and establish a homo and family lh simple
comfort 10 now aud IA becoming incFeas-
insly diiicnli. but there IL no lie WI Oh holds
such possibilities for good and fOr happl-
ness A. dOea the life Of the physician.
! The Campbell gold medal ZOE the high
ct rank In the four years course was
awarded g. Frank Elmer JOhnaon of New
Haven. The Reese prime was divided be-
tween Frank 3 johnson a New Haven
and Herbert x. Thoms Of TOTrington,
Conn The Ferris anatomical prime, Paul
q. Shipley, New Haven; Cum lAuda. Frank
I = johnson. New Haven; Alexander l..
I Prince Patterson, n. j.: Harry st. Clair
Rsynolds, New Haven. and Thomas n.
Russell. New haven.
! The Townsend prize IN the law school
was awarded TO Howard y. Bishop ~
Chicago.
Associaa- Justice Henry BiIlinRa BPown
10 the United States supreme Court,
/ Yale -. delivered the GRAFTON AZ the lala
law school this afternoon His sIhj jet
waA International COurta' lie said IN
part:
international arbitration has been =
dream Of political reiormers from rho time
! the nrst glimmeTinEs Of Greek philosophy
and civilization began 70 dlssipats the
darkness with which ancieat. and part'eu-
larry Oriental. barhaEism had oysrspread
| the earth
| The principle has bean ~ we'll sslab-
lishsd that Il u dlhlcult 10 cohesive Of a
controversy arising with Great Britain
which both sides would not IN willing 10
arbitraie During the ninsteenth century
more than q dozen disputes With the mother
country and az least ~ many more Stth
other foreign Powers Sers submiitefi
70 arbitration.
! J0stine Brown here alluded o. tho r4-
quest from Rspssla In SEQ for the Powers
I . Ak -. IA
/ % consider methods ~ relieving the
world from the Oppressive burden ~ ar
Inaments aud devisinR = meth1'l NJ pre-
serving peane without a resort n force.
He continued:
| II the results Of this conference he meas
ured by the Anticipa1ions % tho Emperor
Of Russia. Who cOnvoked II. and ~ the
ardent friends WHO supported ". n must 10
considered a failure The Powers could
not agree upon a general reduction % aFuna-
ments
| Il must he confessed. however. that the
conventions NJ the Hague conference had
/ but little eject upon the politics ~ Europe.
| within a year after the conclusion % ~
session a waE broke ont between Great
/ Britain and The TFansvaal Republic 10 S0T,h
| Africa. which was wagsd with gV~~- sitter
ness and resulted IN the com. ,bser.
sion of the republic a. an .,'.f- udent
/ Power Beginning In lpot lapA. saTried
! on for q year = isTribl var With Russia
/ for the possession 81 Manchuria and Port
! Arthur. she result of Witch was the esiab-
/ lishment 81 Japan a. q great POweT 20 be
reckoned with IN az Eastern complications
/ and a. unquesiionably the hrsi PoWer Of the
Asiatic continent
/ 80 little influence did this conference
| have upon the preservation Of the Rensra
/ peace that 10 prevent the whole scheme from
/ falling into deauetude IN iaOt Mr.. Roosevelt
| then President Of the United States. acting
/ upon the suggestion Of Congress and vari-
. Gus peace societies. proposed the calling Of
| A second conference which met a. The Hague
I IN June. 1907. and rCmain-d In session until
/ October ~
! While the main object for which this
/ conference was couE Oksd wss not attained.
/ the conference rendered moss valuable SER
/ vice in recommending The creation 81 q
! judicial arbitFal court WhCh seems IN b a
/ supplement 10 the permanent arbitration
court created by the first conference aud
q 20 % an International prize r0urt With
| appellate Jurisdiction over tha highest
courts Of the several Powers. thus ealab-
/ fishing the principle Of compulsory arb iTa-
/ ton in a limited class Of cases
That these conferences. though not sue
/ Ceeding IN the main objects ~ hitting
ornaments and SECURING . compulsory
arbitration of all disputes. have done q vast
deal 10 promote these Obiscts 10 evident
! from the fact that since the first conference
was held more than ANY treaties Of arbi-
tTatInn have been signed among the various
nations Of the earth. some Of them limited
| 10 certain disputes Of q more or less ma
terial character. others 10 ell cases suit
/ able for such submission or which cannot
be asttled BY diplomacy. with q significant
exception In most Of them Of cases ALERT
| ing the independence. vital lnteres, or the
honor Of the contracting States and do not
concern the interest Of third parties. In
some cases the Hague tribunal b specifically
mentioned a. the arhiter and In others not.
The happy results achieved by these
conferences have led the sianch friends Of
arbitration 20 fOresee an early extension
Of the system Of differences Of a more serious
character and 10 an ultimate sabmissiOn
Of all International disputes and general
reduction Of armamenis
Ia this general chorus Of praise and en-
thustasm Il IL Odious 10 utter q discordant
note. but ! hear that those who profess 20
see the coming millennium onot taAs sum
Gent account Of the underlying causes Of
var. which are frequently quite different
from the nominal excuses put forward for
a dsclaFatlon Of h0stIiities.
There are three obstacles witch stand IN
the way Of the solution Of International
questions By the Hague tribunal
l. The impossibliity Of compelling "a
ARBITRATION whenever either Power declines
10 assent 10 ". except Ia prize cases. where
an appeal u given a. matter Of right nom