The Barre daily times. (Barre, Vt.) 1897-1959, 1910-03-09
County Court Starts on Its
Grist Of Work
BARRE SUIT HEARD TODAY
Barre Savings Bank Sued Charles EHa-
son as Endorser Of Note Signed By
William Fraser-Thirty-three
New Divorce Cases.


Washington county court started in
its work this morning with the trial Of
the case Of the Barre Savings Bank 4
Trust company against Charles Eliason
Of South Ryagate The defendants
name appears as an endorser Of q note
drawn by William Fraser a. manager
q the Granite Constnuctior company.
The note whose face value i Sl41.63.
went to protest, followed by the suit If
the bank 70 recover Attorney A. "A.
Sargent appears FOR the plaintiff and
Attorneys Leighton H Slack Of ST
Johnsbury and r NJ Harvey a Mont,
pelier for the defendant
Jurors drawn to-day for the caae were
as fosl0wss D. b. Adams Of Northdeld.
". II. Cady Of Roxbury, George "
Chandler Of Berlin. L L. Freeman Of
Morstown, William Hays Of Duxbury,
silas =. Hougbton Of Cabot, Louis n
Jerue 81 Montpelier, Myron w Niles
Of Middlesex. Adelbort j. Perkins Of
Calais, f. O. sabin Of Woodbury. ard
George r Smith Of Berlin.
The first case heard following the
praiiminaries Of opening the court term
yesterday afternoon was a divorce case,
May Laline Of Barre vs.. Bert Laline of
parts unknown, supposed to BE- ID the
United States army at some point III
Massachusetts,. Petition was asked on
tie grounds Of dcsertion, he having left
bis wife five years ago He has never
written her since he went away Judga
Butler required in this case, and perhaps
viii 10 others. proof Of publication when
personal notice IS not given, and Deputy
County Clerk Moody was put on the
stand 70 testify that the notices we're
legally inserted and printed in the pub
lieatiOn chosen. Hitherto the clerk has
noted on the docket proof Of publira-
ton.
At yesterday afternoons session, the
following entries were nader
Defeult: Max Aeel vs. Louis Carr,
elander; n w Baldwin vs.. w RI Dam
forth, general assumpsit Berkshire
Brewing association W.. Santine Bagen,
general assumpsit; Sylvester huraro "
Boutwell,. Milne, Varnum Co.. W ".
Lapoint W. Charles Coppins, justice
eieetment.
Reports before next term. J. j. sulii-
van Va Charles Bianchi & sons. s. M.
Morrison ". Oscar Thompson. apt, and
trustees, Carrie Royce vs. r. s Diemer.
Eta g Byam vs.. n. "A. Gordon
Settled FIRST National hank Vs. S.
caslsni Elmer II. Bugbee ct TX vs.. Jesse
4 Root and trustee, George 0. lawson
- Crane and Hail. discontinued. State
q Vermont vs.. Granite R. r. Co, dis
continued
IN r. d and Laura A. Bonett vs. es-
tate Of r. G. Campbell, apt report must
s filed On or before May this year
IN Ernest R. Fletcher vs.. Woodbury.
Granite company, defendant filed motion
u continuance and aiidayits Of VI. A.
outton and G r Biekford
New Cases Ea.ered.
New cases entered for trial are the
Eta clough vs.. Raymond Holmes.
1astardy. J. G Wing for plaintiff and
shrtleH for defendsnt.
h. j. slayton vs.. IT, D. Camp, Feplevin,
i NJ Gordon for plaintiff and Carver
or defendant
Gases in ohancery that have been en-
cred are;-
Karl knapp, administrator, vs. Silver
sodge Camp association, M. M Gordon
Or orator.
James S. Kelley vs q. III Deayitt,
amin TRAITOR. Moody for orator
ri A. Brown Va, ID. al Perry q ux.
1arline and Wilson for orator and J.
Il Gordon and r. MI Harvey for de-
endants.
c. G. Richardson a Al. vs.. Consolidated
lighting company, K. M Harvey for
rators and Hoar for defendant.
Melissa Warner rs. Edward Z. Sayers
{ ux. Edgerton for orator, T. r. Gordon
Or defendants.
Thirty three divorce cases have been
led, as follows: Anna r. Gage vs. Ern-
& Fl Gage; George Maynard VS.. Eva
laynard Vernon W. Jewett IS. n E.
ewett; L. IA. Goodel vs.. BlehtabaI
.0odell H. Lundy VS. Mary LSIndy;
difh +. Berry vs. Albert Berry; Tina
Gordon vs Bnrnham B. Gordon; Char
,tte E Lawrence vs Levi NJ. Lawrence;
harles MI Batchalder vs Georgia M.
Rose Norris vs.. John Morris;
Iary III Westover vs I p. West0ver;
atherine "A. Mooney vs.. MI Henry
Iooney; Maud = Thornton vs. Hiram
Thornton: Ida NJ. Burr vs. Clarence
. Burrs Clarence III Burr vs.. Maud
u8Is OVkA D. EbM VS. tttltf d At0Ns
orise r Goddard vs. Edward M Cod
lrd; Louise NJ Thompson US. Eugene G.
thompson; Eflie T. Clark vs. Arthur E.
lark Allie 4. Brigham VS.. Anna B.
Tieham; May Lussier vs. James Lus-
er; Ivey Poulin vs.. Dolor Poulin; For
st r Cutler VS.. Jennie A. CutlerI
ayette w. Erskine vs. Fred u Erskine;
linton II Smith vs. Emma r. Smith;
9phia John vs. Joseph Jobin Mary
aline vs.. Bert ialine; Avis II Stemm
]. Ira g. Stemm Edith Il. Beard Us.
arenee n Beard Josephine Laundry
. Edward Laundry; Bessie LaClair vs..
lbert IaClaiT; Julia Libersont vs.
gorge Libersont; Iyis s. Colby vs.. Fred
Colby