Coeur d'Alene evening press. (Coeur d'Alene, Idaho) 1907-1929, 1909-09-18
Z. A. Rowiey vs. stack-sibbs Lum-
Der company. action on accoAht

Maria Hill and Victor Hiill W.
Occur d'Alene a Spokane Railway
company. action for damages.
X. r. Morgan ". William w, Fer
rell. action on account.
A. Minnick VS.. Occur d'Alena
Lumber company, actioa on ccntrac.
SHELTON q Warren V. r. n. Buell.
and william Russell, action on ae-
count.
Dean & Ross W. george =. Brown
Of ux.. acti "A on account.
Curtis Lightner VS.. ]. w, Slayter.
action on account.
Charles Kildea vs.. w. 8. Gentry
action on promlssory note.
Hayre Commercial company vs..
Frank Lemmer. action ON account
Laurella Augusta VIZ. Edwin DouEt
Ell al. action for damages.
I. w. Reed VS.. School District No.
Az. action on contract.
George r, Newmeyer VS.. Arthur Y.
Morbeck. action on account.
Occur d'AIene Investment com
pany vs.. G. A. Graham. action on ac-
count
w. II. Terrell vs.. J. b. Baldwin.
action on account
George T.. Hollinshead VS.. Wood1
Lumber company, action on account
Irwin r. Delevan W.. Occur d'Alen !
Lumber company. action on contract.
Hugh Fraser G. Co. VS.. George
Chew, action on account
Spokane International Railway
company VI. Ida G. Parker ct al. nc
ton to condemn right OF way.
w. H. Smythe Va McCrea q Mer
iryweather, action on account.
A. H. Arthur vs.. Dan McInnis Ell
al. action for damages.
Evelyn Highom VS.. F. w. Esgate
action for damages.
Crane & Co. VS. Gale Miles ant
William McCarter. action on promis
sorry note.
James casey VS.. John Sullivan e
al. action on contract
william r.. Gibsan VS.. Coeu
d'Alene q Spokane Railway compan.
and Inland Empire Railway com
pany. action for damages.
Hibler. Nedeau 4 Kitchen VS.
Grant Smith. Henry and McFee. &C
ton on contract and for damages.
NJ. T. Savage VS.. b. r. Lewis Lum
Der company. action on contract.
Thomas Brophy vs.. Idaho & Wash.
ington Northern Railway company
action for damages.
T. F. SIS. John vs.. Occur d'Alen
Spokane Railway company, aHtio.
for damages.
B. Hague VS.. Gustav stelberitz, &C
lion for wages.
The Washington Water Powe
company vs.. Mary Schroeder ct al
action to condemn land.
Sandy Alexander VS.. f. l.. Church
Ill, action for wages.
e. A. McCarty VS.. NJ. Lowery an
r. w, Lowery. action on promissor
notes.
Lane Lumber company vs., Farm
ers & Merchants Insurance con
pany. action on contract.
F. A. Blackwell and Fred b. Grin
nell. receivers of the b. r. Levi
Lumber company VS.. Interstate lrr
cation company. action on account
Charles B. LaDeau VS.. Norther
Pacific Railway company. action fo
damages.
r. L. Hilbert VS.. Spokane Interni
tional Railway company. action fc
damages.
@. A. Barry vs.. Spokane Interni
= tionai Railway company. action Il
damages.
;. W. NJ. Stanfleld VS.. Spokane Int
national Railway company, action II
damages.
Ludwig Roper VS.. J. w. Mecrea
al. action on bond.
Ryan Newton Ts, w. W. Ferre
action on account.
Mann & Nelson vs.. Woods Luz
Der company. action on account.
Robert w. Collins vs.. DehihO
Lumber company, action for daT
! ages.
Elmer E. Garrels vs.. George r
erson. action on account.
Loron Fisk vs.. d. j Wright. q
ton on contract.
= Civil Law CaleBdaF.
Arthur p. Powell vs. MACS
J. Grant. action for damages.
Al Joe Frost vs.. salina NJ. Bartells
al, action for damages.
z. Occur d'Alene Lumber cOmpaE
Ltd. ys. L. E. Convey. action ella