davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-12-17
pRnRATE NOTICE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for the County
of King.
State of Washington, County of King.
In the Matter of the Estate of James
Mills, Deceased. No 871S Notice of
Settlement of Final Account.
Notice is hereby given that E. E. Nor
ris, Administrator of the estate of James
Mills, deceased, has rendered to, and
filed in said Court his final account as
such administrator, and that Friday, the
21st day of January. 1910, at $50 o'clock
a, M, at the Court Room of the Probate
Department of our said Superior Court,
in the City, of Seattle, in said King
County, has been duly appointed by said
Court for the settlement of said account,
at which time and, place any person
interested in said estate may appear and
file his exceptions in writing to said
account, and contest the same:
Witness, the Hon. Robert H. Lindsay,
Court Commissioner of said Superior
Court, and the Seal of said Court hereto
affixed this 18th day of December 1909.
d. K. SICKELS, Clerk
By PERCY F. THOMAS,
Seal. Deputy Clerk.
December 17-January IA, 1910
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-12-17
IN PROBATE.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington for King County
In the Matter of the Estate of Emil
Anderson Deceased No. 1886. Notice
to Creditors.
By order of said court made herein on
the 18th day of December 1909, notice
is hereby given to the creditors of, and
to all persons having claims against said
deceased or against said estate, to pre-
to the undersigned administrator of said
estate, at 627 Bailey Bldg, the place of
business of said estate, in Seattle, in
from and after the date of first publ
cation of this notice or same will be
barred
1909.
THOS J. ANDERSON
AS Administrator of said Estate
CHARLES R. CROUCH
Attorney for Estate,
627 Bailey Bldg. Seattle, Wash.
December 17-January IA, 1910.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-12-17
SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION.

JUSTICES COURT-BEFORE JOHN e.
Carroll, Justice of the Peace in and
for Seattle Precinct, King County,
State of Washington. ,,u.o ~,
duco, Defendant.-No. 1881.
State of Washington, County of King, SIS.
The State of Washington to Mike
Delduco:
You and each of you are hereby noti-
fed that Sam Jacobs has filed a suit
against you in said court, which will
come on to he heard at my office in
Room 210 New York Building, Seattle.
King County, Washington, on the, 3rd
day of January, A. D. 1910, at the hour
of $3.50 o'clock a. M, and unless you
appear and then and there answer, the
same will be taken as confessed and the
demand of the plaintiffs granted. The
object and demand of said action is the
sum of $205O for goods sold and deliv-
cred by the plaintiff to the said Mike
Delduco. The said action was filed in
26th day of November, A. D. 1909.
JOHN e. CARROLL,
Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle
Precinct King County, Wash.
December S-December 81. 1909.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-12-17

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF TIE
State of Washington, for King County.
L. w. Barnes, Plaintiff, VS. Katharine
Barnes, Defendant No. -. Summons
for Publication.
The State of Washington to the said
Katharine Barnes, Defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
withn sixty days aft tp, the date Of the The
wit within sixty days after the 18th
day of December, 1909, and defend the
titled court, and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff and serve a copy Of your
answer upon the undersigned attorney
for the plaintiff at his office below
stated. and in case of your failure SO
you according. to the demand of the
complaint, which has been filed with
the clerk of said court
The object of this action is to obtain
a divorce by the plaintiff from you on
the grounds of desertion and cruel and
inhuban treatment.
JOHN T. MULLIGAN.
Attorney for Plaintiff.
Address 1863 New York Block Sc
attic, Washington
December II january 2S, 1910
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-12-17
NOTICE TO CREDITORS.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King County.
In Probate.
In the matter of the estate of Boyd
H. woodward, Deceased.-No. 49,.
Notice is hereby given to the creditors
the said Boyd H. woodward, deceased,
or his estate, to present the same, with
the necessary vouchers to the under
signed administrators of said estate at
the office of Edward Won Tobel, GOA Mu-
tual Life Building, in the City of Seattle.
King County, Washington, the place Of
transaction of business of said estate
first publication of this notice, to-wit:
within one year from the Srd day of
December 1909.
Administrative of the Estate of Boyd H.
Woodward, Deceased.
December 3-December 81, 1909.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-12-17
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington for Lewis


State of Washington for Lewis
W. W. Hunt, Plaintiff, VS.. Frank Page,
Defendant. No. -. Summons by
Publication.
The State of Washington, to the said
Frank Page, Defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication of this summons, to-
wit: within sixty days after the 18th
day of November, 1909, and defend the
above entitled action in the above, en-
titled Court, and answer the complaint
Of the plaintiff and serve copy Of your
for plaintiff. at his office below stated;
and in case of your failure SO to do
according to the demand of the com
plant, which has been filed with the
clerk of said Court.
The object of this action is to quiet
title in the plaintiff and to remove the
cloud from the property described in the
complaint herein.
WILLIAM C. KEITH
Attorney for Plaintiff
Office and Post Office Address: As Starr
Boyd Bldg, Seattle, Wash.
November 19-December 81. 1909.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-12-17
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DIS
TRLBUTIoN SHOULD NOT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. OF THE
State of Washington, for the County
of King--In Probate.
In the matter of the estate of R. H.
w Schweitzer, Deceased.-No. S1S4.
j. G. schnellhardt, administrator of
ceased having filed in this court his pc
tition setting forth that said estate is
now in a condition to be closed and is
ready for distribution of the residue
thereof among the persons entitled by
law thereto, and it appearing to the
court that said petition sets forth facts
sufficient to authorize a, distribution of
the residue of said estate:
1t is therefore ordered by the court
that all persons interested in the estate
of the said R. H. w. Schweitzer, de-
ceased, be and appear before the said
Superior Court Of King County, State
of Washington, at the court room of
the Probate Department of said court in
the City of Seattle, on the 18th day of
January, 1910, at the hour of $3.50
o'clock a. m. of said day. then and there
to show cause, if any they have, why an
order of distribution. should not be made
of the residue of said estate among the
heirs and persons in said petition men
toned, according to law
1t is further ordered that a copy of
this order be published once a week for
18th day of January, 1909. in The Sc
attic Republican, a newspaper printed
and published in said King County and
of general circulation therein.
Done in open court this 26th day of
November, 1909.
ROBERT H. LINDSAY,
Court Commissioner.
State of Washington, County of King, IS.
I, D. K Sickels, County Clerk of
King County and ex-officio Clerk of the
Superior Court of the State of Wash
ington,. for the County of King, do here
by certify that the foregoing is full,
true and correct copy of an original or
der to show cause, made by said Court
on the 26th day of November 1909, in
the matter of the estate of r.. IL,
w Schweitzer, deceased.
Witness my hand and seal of said
Court this 26th day of November, 1909.
(Seal.) D. K. SICKLES, Clerk.
By PERCY f. THOMAS,
Deputy Clerk.
December 3-December 81, 1909.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-12-17

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE He
Emma Shoemaker, Plaintiff, VS.: Clay
ton d. Shoemaker, Defendant. No H.
DIG. Summons by Publication.
The StaIe of Washington to the said
Clayton D. Shoemaker, Defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty 600 days after the date of
the first publication of this summons,
to-wit: within sixty $50 days after the
18th day of December. 1909, and defend
the above entitled action in the above
entitled court, and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your
answer upon the undersigned attorney
for plaintiff, at his office below stated;
and in case of your failure so to do,
judgment will be rendered against you
according to the demand of the com
plant, which has been filed with the
clerk of said court.
The object of the above entitled action
is to obtain a decree of divorce between
the plaintiff and defendant upon the
grounds of failure, neglect and refusal
of said defendant to make suitable pro-
visions for his family and abandonment
for more than one year, together with
the costs of this action.
j. HENRY DEFINING,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
Office and Post Office Address: 1876
Starr Boyd Bldg, Seattle Wash.
Date of first publication. December
18th, 1909
Date of last publication January 28th,
1910.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-12-17
NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF
REAT. ESTATE.

State of Washington, County of King.
SIS.
sheriffs Office
BY virtue of an order of sale, issued
out of the Honorable Superior Court of
King County on the 10th day of De-
cember, 1909, by the Clerk thereof in
the case of The Oriental Trading Com
pany Plaintiff, VS.. Cascade Investment
Company, Defendant No 70318, and to
me, as sheriff, directed and delivered:
Notice Is hereby given that [ will pro-
coed to sell at public auction to the
highest bidder for cash, within the hours
prescribed by law for sheriH's sales,
to-wit, at 10 o'clock a. m. on the 22nd
day of January, A D., 1910, before the
Court House door of said King County,
in the State of Washington, all the
right, title and interest of the said de-
PENDANT Cascade Investment Company,
in and to the following described prop
erty, situated in King County, State of
Washington. to-wt:
Lots three 90 and four "a, block
forty-three (43) of the plat of the town
(now city, of Seattle, as laid out by
David S. Maynard in King County,
Washington, levied on as the property of
said defendant Cascade Investment Com
pany, to satisfy a judgment of fore
closure of a mortgage amounting to
Fifty-nine Thousand Nine Hundred Thir-
teen and 27100 ($59,913. Dollars,
and costs of suit. in favor of plaintiff.
Dated this 18th day of December,
1909
ROBERT T. HODGE, Sheriff.
By BERT c. THOMPSON,
Dooo,,boa Tan,,oru 1o10
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-12-17
STOCKHOLDERS MEETING.
NOTICE OF MEETING TO INCREASE
CAPITAL STOCK OF THE
VITTUCCT IMPORTING COMPANY,

Notice is hereby given that a meeting
porting Company a corporation organ
Washington. will be held at the office of
said Company at 400 Occidental Avenue
Seattle, Washington. on the 18th day of
February, 1910, at 2 p. m. of said day,
for the purpose of increasing the capital
stock of the Vittucci Importing Company
from Five Thousand Dollars to Fifty
Thousand Dollars
JOSEPH VITTUCCI,
Trustee.
w. C. PARTRIDGE,
Trustee.
December 17-January 4, 1910
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-12-17

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, in and for the
County of King.
Sarah H. Evans, Plaintiff, VS.. Charles
r. Evans, Defendant. No. --. Sum-
mons by Publication.
State of Washington, County of King.
SIS.
The State of Washington to Charles
R. Evans, the above named defendant,
Greeting:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty 600 days from the day of
the first publication of this summons,
to-wit: sixty 600 days from the 18th
day of December, 1909, and defend the
above entitled action in the Superior
Court of the State of Washington for
King County aforesaid, and answer the
complaint of the plaintiff and serve
copy of your answer upon the under
signed attorney for plaintiff at his office
below stated and in case of your failure
so to do, judgment will be rendered
against you according to the prayer of
plaintiffs complaint, which has been
filed with the clerk of said court.
This is an action for divorce on the
ground of abandonment for more than
one year and failure to provide, and for
general relief.
HERBERT E. SHOOK,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
597-539 Burke Building, Seattle, Wash
ington.
December 17-January 2S, 1910.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-12-17
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, in and for the

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, in and for the
County of King.
Leon Stuckenholz, Plaintiff VS. Cath
crime StuckenholZ Defendant No. -.
Summons and Service of Publication.
The State of Washington to the said
Catherine Stuckenholz, Defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty COO days after date of
first publication of this summons, to-
wit: within sixty (60) days after the
18th of December, 1903, and defend
the above entitled action in the above
entitled court and answer the complaint
of plaintiff and serve a copy of your
answer upon the undersigned attorney
for plaintiff at the office below stated,
Judgment will be rendered against you
according to the demand of the com
plant which has been filed with the
clerk of said court.
The object for which this action is
brought is to obtain a decree OF divorce
from the defendant upon the following
grounds:
Because the defendant has been guilty
of many personal indignities so as to
render plaintiffs life burdensome, said
personal indignities consisting of quar-
reling, use of vile and bad names, cruel
ty and infidelity and also because the
defendant abandoned the plaintiff in Chi
cago, Illinois, in the month of August,
1907, and because said abandonment has
been continuous for one year and more.
A. J. SPECKERT,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
500 Burke Bldg, N. w. Cor. End and
Marion Seattle, Wash
December 17-January 2S, 1910.
The Montgomery advertiser., 1909-04-14
SICK DOCGOR
Proper Food Put Him Right. l.

The food experience of a physician in his own case when worn and weak from sickness and when needing hour ishment the worst way Is valuable:
 An attack of grip. so severe 1t came near making an end of me, left my stomach in such condition could not retain any ordinary food. I knew of course that I must have food nourish- ment or l could never recover.
 "I began to take four teaspoonfuls of Grape Nuts and cream three times a day and for weeks this was almost my only food; 1t tasted so delicious that I enjoyed it immensely and my stomach handled it perfectly from the first mouthful. It was so nourishing I was quickly built back to normal health and strength.
 Grape Nuts is of great value as food to sustain life during serious at tacks In which the stomach Is so de- ranged 1t cannot digest and assimilate other foods.
 T am convinced that were Grape Nuts more widely used by physicians, 1t would save many lives that are other wise lost from lack of nourishment" Absolutely the most perfect food in the world. Trial of Grape-Nuts 10 days proves There's A Reason" Look in pkg. for the little book, The Road to Wellville."
 Ever read the above letter9 A new one appears from time tO time. They are genuliae. trues and full of human interest. <
The Montgomery advertiser., 1909-04-14
REcovERS VALUE OF
 PAWNED DIAMOND

But one case occupied the attention of the civil division of the City Court of Montgomery yesterday, that of suit instituted by W. E. Powell by next best friend. L. J. Powell. against J. B. Buckner for the value of a diamond ring.
 Young Powell said on the stand that he was possessed of diamond ring valued at s125, and that wanting some ready money. he had offered the ring to Buckner in pledge for loan of $25 on ninety days time. Buckner took the ring. and in turn rendered the loan. Powell further stated that when he went to find Bckner to redeem his ring, Buckner was not to be found and that later he refused to give the ring back in exchange for $25.
 Buckner, on the other hand, testified that he had been approached by young Powell for @ loan. and that he had agreed to buy the ring for s25, Powell having the privilege of buying the ring back from him at the end of ninety days for S26. Buckner said that the ring had not been left with him as security, but that he had purchased 1t.
 After a short consideration, the jury in the case thought that young Poweips statement of the case to be the truth ful one. and rendered him a judgment against Buckner in the sum of $100.
The Montgomery advertiser., 1909-04-14
REFUSED TO HAUL CORPSE Woman Sued a Rail-
 road. CASE IN TIE. SUPREME COURT Mrs. Susie Brady of Gadsdsn Suffered Variously. Received Verdict of sSeo ia the Gads- den City Court, but the su-
 prsme Court Reverses
 the Decision.

When the Gadsden and Attalia Rail- road refused to haul the corpse of her husband from Attalla to Gadsden, Mrs. Susie Brady suffered variously, and as Ia result sued the railroad for $5,o00. She averred that she was damaged when the delay of Ahe remains oeca- stoned postponement of the funeral. and the disappointment of the many attendants, who had gathered at the church; that she suffered, metal an- guish and physical pain when the body finally arrived. greatly decomposed by the delay at Attalla; that she was subjected to various expenses, by the refusal of the road to haul the corpse. She gained $500 in the Gadsden City Court.
 The Supreme Court, however. re- versed the decision of the lower court. in an opinion handed down yesterday by Judge Denson, and the case will go for a new trial in Gadsden.
 The contest of the will of John Stan i'll. of Dallas County which involved 2.050 acres of land. was settled yes- terday, when the Supreme Court sus- tained the decision of the chancellor of the lower court. The property was willed to Louis Johnson and his wife. and Norman s. Stanfiil and other kins- men contested 1t, claiming undue in- fiuence. The Chancellor awarded the property to Johnson, and. upon appeal the Supreme Court sustained the award
 The ease of John Rollings, who shot and killed George Roden in Marshal County, and who was sentenced to five years for manslaughter. was reversed and rennanded for new trial.
 The Court concluded the call o:g the Fifth Division docket of civil cases and adjourned until Thursday, when criminal cases will be taken up. The following opinions were submitted yes- terday.
 DOwDELL. c. J.-
 rallassee Falls Mfg. Co. vs. First National Bank of Alexander City. ap- peal from Tallapoosa Circuit Court; re- versed and Eremanded.
 SIMPSON. T
 Norman s. Stanfill. ct al. vs. Lewis Johnson. appeal from Selma City Court; affirmed.
 DENSoN, IL
 Alabama City, Gadsden and Atta1la Railway Company vs. Susie Brady, ap- peal from Gadsden City Court; reversed and remanded.
 MAYETELD. J.-- ~
 John RollinEs vs. State of Alabama. appeal from Marshall Circuit Court; re- versed and remanded.
The Montgomery advertiser., 1909-04-14
RIVER RATES MUST STAND Decision of Railroad
 Commission. WILL ALLOW NO CUT RATES War ,Would Eventually Kill off
 Competition. The Commi.sion sReaehes the Conclu- .ie. That th. Mobile Navisasio. Co. and the B. q c. Naviss-
 tsea e. Desired War.

Alabama's Railroad Commission has declared itself on the matter of steam boat rates. and the declaration takes the form of an order affirming the present schedule. and admonishing steamboat operators to observe 1t strictly. ~
 ..The Commission" ran the order, disapproves of the rates of the Mobile Navigation Company. and of the Bir- pany; 1t re-affirns the act estabiishtns a tariff of rates. and orders all oper- ators to observe it."
 After the session ofs Monday. at which evidence was taken tending to show the effect of the Commission- made tariff, and also tho effect-of the cut rates as established by the Mobile and B. q c. Companies. the two mem- hers of the Commission present, Pres- conference far into the night. A re- view of the evidence was made. and the decision reached that the schedule as already fixed was sufficiently low, and that any cut was obviously for the purpose of killing competition, and Therefore was not legal.
 The printed decision tells of the events which lead to the hearing. It says that no complaints had ever 
 rates, but that. when the two new companies instituted the cut rate. the Commission desired to ascertain as to how it's rates stood. and as to what was the purpose of the cut.
 The Commission, according to its decision. reached the conclusion that the low rates were instituted so that the revenue of the other companies would be cut, and that the business of the river traffic would revert to the company offering the low rate. The two companies of the low rate deciar- ed that their action was largely an experiment., and that they lost money, s2So to be definite, by two trips at the low rate. But. despite this, the Commission held that a rate fight and not an experiment, prompted the cut.
 The Commission declared that cut ting in rates would finally result In demoralization. and, ultimately. into a combination or pool of interests for seIf-protection, all of which would be to the. detriment of the shippers inter ests.
 With these premises. the Commission drew the conclusion that its rates as already established, were sufficientls low. and that they should hold good And hence the ukase, forbidding fur' ther rate-cutting.