The Caldwell tribune. [volume] (Caldwell, Idaho Territory [Idaho]) 1883-1928, 1909-06-05
DISTRICT JUDGE
HAS BUSY WEEK

Court opened Tuesday morning
with Judge Bryan presiding. After
the calendar was read and cases set,
a number of applicants for naturaliza-
ton were disposed Of.
In the case of State VS.. William Full
Ter and Walter Freeman, called and
the time for trial would be set on
June 4th, at which time 1t would be
definitely decided when the trial
would take place. All the criminal
cases were disposed of or will be on
that date. The remainder of the cal
endar was disposed of as follows: The
sheriff was granted an extra deputy
during the present terms of court. The
case of Mrs. B. Wallace VS.. A. A.
Branthoover, demurrer was confessed
and defendant given 80 days to file
amended demurrer. ]. E. Rowland VS..
American Ditch Co., placed on calen-
dar. Elisha Kanhaba VS.. ]. j. Jarvis,
placed on calendar. Sam Haas VS.. A.
r. Teeters, placed on calendar.
Holmes VS. Erwin, demurrer argued
and defendant given ten days to an
swer. Anna M. Lutz VS.. W. E. Lutz,
placed on calendar and default of de-
PENDANT entered and decree granted.
B. F. Bartch VS.. Oscar FIGHT, default
of defendant entered. Frank Crow
Their VS.. The Board of County Commits
sioners, placed on calendar. J. H.
Valentine VS.. City of Caldwell, plain
tiff given leave to amend complaint.
U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. VS.. ].
H. Forbes, dismissed at plaintiffs
costs. Charles Robertson VS.. F. B.
Hardy, dismissed at plaintiffs costs.
A. H. Wilkie VS.. A. E. Wright, demur-
rer withdrawn and defendant given
10 days to answer. City of Nampa VS..
Pioneer Irrigation District, defendant
given until June 10 to answer. Agnes
Machos VS.. A. M. Henry, argument on
motion to strike taken under advise
ment. A Gambil VS.. T. ]. Bailey, taken
from calendar Parma State bank VS..
NJ. A. Bates, dismissed at plaintiffs
cost. A. B. Moss & Bro. VS.. A. H. Ra-
mey, set for June 4th Payette Nation
| tional bank VS.. A. H. Ramey, set for
| June 4th. Payette Nat. bank VS.. The
Radio Co., demurrer overruled. G. w
| Gilmore VS.. James Norton, gone tc
judgment by stipulation. Anna E
Majors vs. William Majors, demurrer
withdrawn and defendant given II
days to answer L. Wickland VS.. ]. W
Cook, demurrer withdrawn and II
days to answer. Kearnohan & Ste
vens VS.. Bow & Bow, continued. Pay
cite Fruit Packing Co. VS.. Miller Bros
dismissed. d. D. hurry VS.. Elizabeth
Frost, defendants given until June
to answer. F. NJ Satoris VS.. o. s
L. Railway, dismissed. Dwight Dut
ton VS.. Lester Seawell, continued 70
term. Canyon County VS.. ]. j. Jarvis
plaintiff given leave to submit amend
. ed complaint. l. S. Froman VS.. AID
} F. Madden, defendant given leave t
: file offer. R. w. White VS.. AndreN
| Fronknecht, decree granted. ]. F
> Hall VS.. B. c. Bertleson, on motion 70
l a change of venue, set for June 4tf
r Antoine Hinkey VS.. H. A. Partridge
dismissed. c. E. Saxton VS.. F.
Breshears, sheriff, at issue. T. ]. Ham
ilton VS.. F. L. Tschudy, set for Jun
TO- Charles Hansen VS.. P. V. r. Co
demurrer overruled, defendant give
10 days to plead. Central Lumber c.
rs. T. o. Murray, decree granted a
prayed for. Fannie Licklider VS.. v
l. W. Hicks, placed on calendar. c.
. Mason VS.. ]. G. Sloan, given leave t
show why case should be continue,
h D. S. Richards VS.. Frank Wolf, deere
# granted as prayed for. o. w. Hall v
= J. w. Mathews, dismissed. Magdalt
: ma Neubaumer VS.. Edward Neubaume
r stricken from calendar. Eureka Ditto
> Go. VS.. William Vail, dismissed. ].
h Baker VS.. o. S. L. R. R. will be hear
n June on motion to dismiss. Gel
trude Fugihara vs.. Frank Fugihar'
dismissed. Hazel Harting VS.. Charlie
o Harting, transferred to trial calenda
% Gus Tregaskia VS.. l. n R. R. Co., dill
II missed. w. L. Maple VS.. Cyrus WI
e liams, set for hearing argument @
y demurrer, June 4. S. E. Wilson v
William Hoobler, demurrer withdraw
7. and defendant given until June 8 |
IS answer.
Court adjourned until June 2.
Wednesday.
II The time for the trials of all Grim
8 nal cases was to be decided on FIR
u day. The case of e. s. Spach VS.. ].
% Woodward argued and taken undo
! advisement. ]. B. Moore VS.. Lyd