Bridgeton pioneer. (Bridgeton, N.J.) 1884-1919, 1909-04-29
CIVIL SUITS ARE
NOW IN PROGRESS.

case of The Millville National Bank
against Zebedee W. Headley and
others. minors was quickly disposed
| OF. The case was to recover on pro
missory notes given by George Nv.
Headley, father of the minors, who
had died before the notes were paid,
and left property in Millville. There
was no defence.
Judge Endicott instructed the jury
to return a verdict for 1852. As, which
was done. Walter H. Bacon represent
ed the bank.
This case was tried with the Triano-
vsky jury, and interjected.
| The Trianovsky case was conducted
by Judge John W. Wescott. of Cam.
den, for the plaintiff, and Herbert c.
Bartlett for the defendant. 1t was
suit to recover money paid to George
Leach for land which Leach sold to
Trianovsky by alleged misrepresenta-
tion. The land was alleged to be sold
for 1914 acres, mostly heavily timbered
where is timber and good land, while
in fact it had no timber on of conse-
quence and contained but 154 acres;
Trianovsky alleged that Leach showed
him timber on lands other than the
| land sold to the plaintiff.
| The defence was that Trianovsky
was all wrong in his allegations, and
that the plaintiff had thrown up his
b argain because he failed to sell it as
soon as he had desired.
! The next case called after the con-
clusion of the Trianovsky case was
the case of Joseph Zambone and
Jennie Zambone against Julius Shen-
berg and Jacob Rubinoff, and a jury
was put in the box.
Herbert G. Bartlett appeared for the
plaintiff and Henry S. Alvord for the
defendants.
Before this case was begun jury
was also drawn by the Sheriff for the
trial of the case of Bernard Rosenield
against Charles I. Williams, which is
| expected to be the first case Wednesday
morning at 9. Is o'clock.
The Zambone suit is in ejectment.
They, Mr.. and Mrs. Zambone purchas
ed property in Vineland over yeal
ago from Mr.. Tower The defendants
were in possession of the property ano
when the Zambones made attempt tt
take possession of the property the
tenants claimed to have a five yeal
lease on the property which still hac
three years to run. The suit is now
brought to eject them, the claim being
that the defendants were monthly
tenants only. Evidence to the plain
tiff's side was given by Mrs. Fam
bone. Mr.. Wilbur Tower who sold the
property, testified that the defendants
Shenbery and Rubinoff had no Lease
lease had never been completed be
tween him and them. He admitted
that he had delivered them two lease!
which he had signed but which they
had not signed.
The lease, however, was subsequent
ly signed by them.
The jury in the Trianovsky cast
came in last night just before eighr
O'Clock. A verdict of ''no cause Of
action was found.
Wednesday Morning.
Court opened this morning at 9. 15
Judge Endicott presiding.
The first case called was Bernard
Rosenfeld against Charles I. Williams.
In tort for libel.
A jury chosen yesterday was in the
box.
The lawyers were Frank S. Mckee,
Jr., for Rosenfeld and Albert r. Nc
Allister and Leroy w. Loder for Mr..
Williams.
The plaintiff. Mr.. Rosenheld, is 6
resident of Rosenhayn, naturalize6
citizen. He is a native of Palestine,
he said while on the witness stand,
and native of the CITY of Joppa.
He charged Mr.. Williams with
treating him with great indignities al
trial before Williams as Justice.
"He treated me like a dog - said the
witness in his endeavor to show malice
on the part of Mr. Williams towards
the witness. He charged Williams
with publishing letter to Rosentield
of a libelous character. Rosentield re-
ceived the letter bv mail.
DR.. Greenwood, of Rosenhayn, iden.
titled the letter to Rosentield as the
writing of Charles 1. Williams. The
doctor stated that he interpreted the
letter to Rosenfield.
Postmaster Barnhardt, of Rosen.
hayn, identified a letter which had
been written by Charles I. Williams
concerning Rosenfeld.
| The letter was introduced in evil