Norwich bulletin., 1909-11-06
TO SIT IN PUTNAM.
Judge Robinson Will Try Cases There
 for Next Two Weeks.

< Superior court will not be in ses- sion in this city again for two weeks at least. On Friday Judge Robinson decided to go to Putnam next week, when he will hear several cases that are to be tried before jury. He an nounced that he had an engagement for next week Friday so there could be no short calendar session, so he assigned number of court cases for trial at Putnam. week after next, here Friday. He will return to this city later to hear cases and he said that he would stay here until December if there is enough business to warrant his doing so.
 Short Calendar Business.
 When Putnam assignments had been made, short calendar business was taken up.
 In the case of Central Vermont Rail- way company's appeal from the decis- ion of the railroad commissioners rel ative to the elimination of the grade crossing at Camp Station, Town Coun- sel A. J. Bowen announced that he had consented to allow the matter go over until the next short calendar session, as the attorney for the rail- way people could not be present to argue the demurrer
 With reference to case of Charles B. Wheatley vs. the Industrial and Manufacturing company of Danielson, which is now in the hands of a re- ceiver, court ordered an answer filed by defendants attorney within a week so that the pleading can be closed and the case be placed on the trial list.
 No Divorce Decree.
 In. the divorce case of Ida M. Beau din ys. Mederick Beaudin, court order ed a further notice published, as the whereabouts of the defendant are un- known.
 Attorney George w. Melony told the court that having talked the matter over with a number of the local attor- neys he was of the opinion that there would be number of cases ready aft CT the court is finished at Putnam.
 State Attorney Searls told the court that the capias issued Wednesday for Thomas Osier of Killingly, who was summoned as a witness in the case of Lester Henry, but did not obey the summons. was not the right pro- cedure as the case had been disposed of, and in order to bring him before the court it would be necessary to is sue bench warrant. He presented on that he had already drawn up and same was ordered issued and the sher- If of the county or some indifferent person was ordered to serve same at once.
 Decree and Alimony Granted.
 The divorce case of Candance Young vs. Charles A. Young of Pleasant street, this city, was next called. Att torney s. B. Harvey represented Mrs. Young and her husband made no ap- pearance. Much of the evidence was of a character unfit to print. After hearing the case, Judge Robinson granted a decree upon the two grounds alleged and ordered Charles A. Young to pay alimony of $700 and further or dered that the same be paid within thirty days. The divorce was obtained on the grounds of adultery and cruel ty.
 Mrs. Young said that she left her husband more than a year and a half ago because of his infatuation and attentions to Mrs. Norton Herrick and for the reason that he had also abused her by kicking her. One occasion he had broken in the door of the house with an ax and then pulled the bed upon which she was lying, to pieces
 She told of his having threatened to kill her. He abused her by vile Ian guage and in other ways. They were married in 1888 and had always had more or less trouble until she at last had to leave him because he began to visit Mrs. Herrick. She testified to the fact that her husband and Mrs Herrick are living together at the Young house in Pleasant street, and that she had often seen them riding and walking together and at the nov ing picture shows.
 Deserted Husband.
 Norton Herrick testified that he was the husband of Nellie Herrick and that she was now living with Young at the Young place on Pleasant street, and that before she went there Young had visited their home on Center street often. When he remonstrated with her for going around with Young she had replied that she did not care what was said about it, as MT. Young was good friend of hers. He said that he had been to the front of the Young place to see his children, who were living there with their mother. He had seen things in his own home that looked suspicious before his wife had gone to live with Young.
 A number of other witnesses testi- fled to having seen Mrs. Herrick and Young together. Attorney c. D. Ca pen testified that he considered the Young property on Pleasant street worth $4,000 and that there was 6 mortgage of $1,000 upon it.
 Judge Robinson then gave his decis- ion. Court was adjourned until next Tuesday at Putnam