The Washington herald., 1909-11-16


way Of Hilo. Hawaii. John s. Dawson. Of Topeka.
AanS' Evan B. Lewis Of Philadelphia. Pa. VIII
nam X Rummler. OF Chicago. H.; T. Carroll
9ol4eiler' OF Reading Pa: Wilbur L. Cummings.
o. o. seattle. Wash. William T. Beck. Of Spokane.
H1.n-' ana Royal Victor. Of New York City were
admitted 20 practice
No. Original. The United States Of America.
complainant. is. Joseph T. Ship Ct al Mr.. So
ncltor General Bowers announced % the court that
tile ueiendants- Joseph J.. Ship. jeremiah Gibson.
luther Williams. Nick Nolan. Henry Padgett. and
NHI.tn Aayse, were present in court In response
70 the rule issiscd against them. and asked that
sentence 30 pronounced. These defendants were
then called 10 the bar by the clerk The Chief
follows:
You. joseph r. Ship jeremiah Gibson. Luther
Williams, Nick Nohln. Henry Padgett and William
M'yse. are before this court on attachment for
contempt
'On return TO a rEe 70 show cause you have pre-
sented such evidence as you were advised and been
fully heard orally and on printed briefs. ard after
thorough consideration you have been found guilty
You have also been permitted seyeraIly 10 present
peuuons Tor rehearing and move that leave b.
granted % fe them, which. after consideration
have been denied
The grounds upon which The concuson was
reached set forth in the opinion tiled herein on
Monday. Hay e. l9o. and need not Dc repeated
nor need wo dwell upon the destructive consequences
OF permitting the transaction complained Of % pass
into a precedent for unpublished contempt.
~ ~ NNLAalAILtA II lAt CnNfL and tf0 judgment
OF tho court s that "a punishment for the con
tempt. you. Joseph T. Shipp. Luthcr Williams and
Nick Nolan. and each of yuu BE- impris0ned for
the period Of ninety days. and that you jeremiah
Gibson. Henry Padgett. and william Nayse and
each Of you. b imprisoned for the period of sixty
days. in the Jail Of tbs District u Columbia The
marshal Of this court is charged with tho ezecu-
ton Of this Judgment
No. sos II Paso and NcrtIcastern Rsilrav Con-
pony. plaintiff in eTrur. Euedina Gutierrez, adj
minisratFix SC; in error 20 The supreme Court Of
the state Of Texas: judgment affirmed. with costs.
Opinion by Mr. Justice Day
No. %. Clara F.. sylvester 90 a.. plaintiff !n error
vs The State cf Washington. I'M error 10 tho Su-
rrsme Court Of the State q Washington: Judgment
IfiTmed, with costs Opinion BY Mr. Justice
Holmes.
No 32s Elizabeth NJ McGnua ot a.. appellants.
VI. Z. w. Boss. State Land Commissioner Of
The State Of Washington. 20 al; appeal from the
United States Circuit Court q Appeals for the
Ninth circuit Decree reversed AZ tho cost az the
appellants. and cause rpmandri % the Circuit Court
Of tho United States for tho Western district of
Washington with directions % vacata the decree
ca the merits and TO sustain the demurrer Tor
want ot jurisdiction, AMI on that ground % dis
miss tho SHIT Opinion ty Mr. Justice NlcKeuua
Mr.. Justice Holmes concIrg I'm the result.
No. = Albert Marbles. appellant. Edmund
?. Creccy, chief of police o. the city Of St Louis
o. al appeal from he Circuit Court Of the
United States for tho Eastern district q Mis-.
solri; order affirmed. with c0sts Opinion by Mr.
Justice Harlan.
Tho CHEF justice announced the following orders
q the court:
No. g. Samuel Barrier. jr plaintiff in error. vs.
Butte Consoiidated Mining Company; in error 90
the supreme Court Of the State Of Montana; per
cIriam; writ Of error dismissed for want ~ ilris-
uictiou- Butte City Water Company IS. Baker Il5
[. s.. 10. Hdirc vs.. Rice % L. S.. 2el: say
ward vs. Denny. is q. S. $50: Moran Us Horszy
lio T. s. 35: Bcals Us. Cone. 1S5 T.. S. l54: Iowa
rs. Rude. ls7 L. s.. S.; Stewart VS.. Hows-r %
I. s.. 5s5 Gatcwood VS.. North Carolina a05 T.. S.
81; Bschtel rs. Wilson. % L. s.. Sc; Iowa Cen
tal Railway Company Va Iowa. 16O T. s.. $40.
No. ~ Jerome II. Bemicy e. Co.. plaintiff in
error, joseph ". Stern and Edward b. Marks
in error % the Circuit Court of the United States
Tor the Southern district of New York. Per clrian
WIT Of eTCr dismissed for want Of final Judgment
MclAsh vs.. BOf. Al u. s.. Col: Pfaeizer Va Bach
Fur Company. Of Illinois. November s. 1902
No $50. North Carolina Mining COMPANY appeI-
lant, vs. c. r. Westfedt % al. appeal from The
[ nited States Court q Appeals f0r the Fourth
circuit Per curam. Anroll dismissed for want
q jurisdiction. Wetfcdt va. Mining Company. I55
Fed. Re7.. 708; application for ccrtiorau denied
April -. 1903 2li Z. s. 56; application for appeal
denied May B, 1909. by the Circuit Court Of Ap-
peaLs: appeal granted June -. 1902 By one Of the
circuit judges who had not sat as a member OF the
Court Of Appeals the hearing of the case or
Of the application for appeal. motion to set aside
the order denied August q. l9o9 Macfadden vs..
United states. rs Y. \. -e8; Greeley Va. Lowe. ]
l5 L. s.. S. In ~ VIM. g3 L.. S. as. in re
Moore. 90 L. S. $50
No. 6F. Guaranty Trust COMPANY Of New York
aILeIlAlL. MlLrNFflLlu street hallway lfmDTWv
81 all appeal from the Circuit Court of the United
States for the S0u,herl district Cf New York Fer
curiam: Appeal dismissed for want g jurisdiction
Carey vs. Houston and Texas Central Railway Com
pauy. 80 T. s.. 10; in re Lennon. ID. 995: Cor
nell IS. Srcer. l63 L. S.. -; Empire State-IdahO
Mining and Developing Company vs.. Hanley. 85
L. S.. &5: Goodrich vs.. Ferris. 2li L. g.. Il; Far
rel vE O'Bnen. l99 e. s.. So: Louisville Trust
Company rs. Knott. l9l [. s.. %; United States
vs. LeTkin 9s Z. s., S9i Atlantic Trust Company
1s Chapman, receiver, ID. 35l: Bicu vs. Robinson
receiver. ID. i3: Dcmar Jockey Club vs. Missouri
20 U. s.. 32i and see in re Metropolitan Railway
ReceivCrship. 56 Z. s.. 90: Guaranty Trust Com
Uany vs.. Metropolitan Street Railway COMPANY l66
Fed, SO; l63 Fed. 9S7; l-0 Fed, s5j: d. 65 ID
66. IL Fed. l0f; ID. l0lj: ID. 1912: Morton I
Trust Company vs. Metropolitan Street Railway |
Company. 10 Fed 90. Guaranty Trust Company |
ys Second Avenue Railway Company. III Fed. l02O; |
Pcunsylvauia Steel Company Metropolitan Street
Railway COMPANY. 10 Fed, g.
No. 635. Guaranty Trust Company n New York /
petitioner. vs. Metropolitan Street Railway Com /
No SEC Morton Trust Corrrrny. petitioner. Va |
Guaranty Trust Company n New York. ct al and /
No. ca. Metropolitan Securities Company. peti- |
toner William w. Iadd. receiver. &C; petit !
tious fer writs Of certiorar 10 the United States
Circuit Court Of Appeals for the Second circuit /
denied.
No. So The California Deyclounrnt Comr,rv
petitioner. vs.. The New Liverpool salt Company: I
petition for a WIT Of ccrti0ran to tho United |
States Circuit Court q Appeals for the Ninth cir
cult denied
No. 45l. Sarah J. Eddy petitioner. VS.. The City
and County Of san Francisco. petition FOR a writ /
Of ceTtiOran 10 tho United States Circuit Court Of
Appeals for the Ninth circuit denied
No. GO. Dering Coal Company. petitioner vs. /
II. Ernest Hutton. administrator. &c. petition for /
a writ Of ccrtorad 90 the United States Cirr-lit
Court Of Appeals for The Seventh circuit dsnicI /
No. as Capt. John '. Martin ct al, plaintiffs /
IN error. A. J. West. notion 20 dismiss or af /
firm postponed % the hearing Of the case on us /
merits.
No. Il. Illinois CertTnl Railroad Company Of the |
State of Illinois. plaintiff in error. vs. Robert W. 1
sheesog administrator Of the estate Of John T. 1
Sheegog. deceased; motion % add % the record /
herein The proceedings the Circuit Court Of the 4
United States for the Western district Of Ken 1
tucsy denied.
No. 20 sHas Pickett. plaintiff in error. VI. /
The United States; motion 10 advance submitted /
ig Mr.. Solicitor General Bowers. for tho defend
ant 80 error.
No. iia John wynnc plaintiff IN error. ~ The
United States; motion 20 advance submitted by /
Mr.. Solicitor General Bowers. for tho defendant
10 error.
No. 10. Original Ex rarts: IN the matter Of tho /
United States petitioner hearing return 70 rule /
set Tor Monday. January 10. 1910 in connection With
Nos 55l and Sc on motion Of Mr.. Solicitor Cen
orul Bowers for tho Petitioner.
Motion for leaTo TO fle answer ol Oberlin NJ |
Cartsr. answer Of John p. Daish. and suggestion
that the petition herein has been ruemat1rely filed
submitted b. Mr. John J.. Daish in that behalf
No CO. Commercial Mica Company petitioner
rs Mica lnsllator COMPANY; petition for a writ Of
csrtior1 % the United States Circuit Court OF /
Appeals for the Seventh circuit submitted by Mr..
joseph r. Edson and Mr.. William r. Rummler for
tho petitioner. and BY Mr.. William II. Kenyon for
the respondent
No 60 Charles ". Morse. petitioner " Tho |
United States; petition for a writ df ceTtiorari 10
the United states CirCut Court OF Appeals for the
Second circuit submitted by Mr.. Martin w little !
ton Tor the petitioner, with leave 70 Mr. Soirito-
General Bowers. for tho respondent, to hle brief
within ten days.
No. OIL Liverpool and London and Globe Invur.
Gnco ConpanT petitioner. VI. George H. NfcFaddo- |
et al petition for a wit Of certioran 10 tbo |
United States Circuit Court Of Appeals for tho