The Caldwell tribune. [volume] (Caldwell, Idaho Territory [Idaho]) 1883-1928, 1909-12-18


two years" instead of "three years"
motion, the vote resulted:
Ayes-Devers, Paynter-2.
Nays-Clark Farrar, Gartin, Clip
som. So the amendment was lost.
The roll being called on the original
motion, the vote resulted:
Ayes-Clark, Farrar, Gartin, Clip
son-4.
Nays-Devers. Paynter-2. So the
motion prevailed.
A motion was read by Farrar that
the laying OF sidewalk ordered by
Resolutions Z, 8 and 8. be advertised
and the time fer opening bids be set
for Monday evening, December 27,
1903. The roll being called on the
motion, the vote resulted:
Ayes-Clark, Devers, Farrar, Gar
tin, Paynter-5.
Nays-Gipson. So the motion pre-
vailed.
Sidewalk Resolution No. % by Far
rar, providing for the construction
of a sidewalk according to Plan 1, of
Ordinance No. 148 of the City of
Caldwell, Idaho, along Arthur street in
front of Lots l to II, inclusive, in
Block II, original townsite, City of
Caldwell, Idaho, and providing for
the payment of the cost of such con-
structlon by an assessment levied
against the property fronting or
AUDITING on said sidewalk" was read.
The roll being called on the resoIu
ton, the vote resulted
Ayes-Clark, Devers, Farrar, Gar
tn Glpson, Paynter-6.
Nays and absent-0.- So the reso-
luton passed.
Resolution No. 26, by Paynter,
providing for the construction of a
sidewalk according to Plan 3 of Or
dinance No. 148 of the City of Cald
well, Idaho, along Aven street in
front OF Lots l, and 3, Block 3,
Galloway addition, City of Caldwell,
Idaho, and providing for the pay
ment of such construction by an as
sessment levied against the property
fronting OF abutting on said side
walk" was read. The roll being
called on the resolution, the vote re-
suited:
Ayes-Clark, Devers, Farrar, Gar
tin, GIBSON, Paynter-6.
Nays and ABSENT. Sc the
resolution passed.
A Mr.. Percer having purchased
Blocks 2, 3 and A, in Frost's addition
to the City of Caldwell, wanted to
vacate the same as lots and throw it
into acreage. Voted, on motion of
ClarF, that it is the sense of the
council that the city grant the relief
asked for.
Plat of Parks Vineyard add. to the
City of Caldwell was presented and
on motion of Gipson same was re-
ferred to Street Committee to see
that streets are graded, bitches dug
on proper lines and all in proper
shape for acceptance by the City and
to report at the next meeting.
ii. ID. Blatchley, filing statement
of weed cutting foreman excepting
Block 1, Washington Heights add
from weed cutting assessment except
Lots A, 5, 6, 20 and Fl, motion was
made by Gipson that on presenta-
ton of Tax Certificate showing pay
ment of assessment, the City Clerk
shall draw warrant rebating said
Blatchley $7.55. The roll being
called on the motion the vote result
ed:
Ayes-Clark, Devers, Farrar, Gar
tin, Gipson, Paynter-6. So the mo-
ton prevailed.
G. L. Crookham filing statement of
weed cutting foreman that a lots out
of IL lots in Block AZ original town
should be excepted from weed cut
ting assessment. A motion was made
by Clark that on presentation of Tax
Certificate showing payment of as
sessment the City Clerk shall draw
warrant rebating said Crookham
$3.50. The roll being called on the
motion, the vote resulted:
Ayes-Clark, Devers, Farrar, Gar
tin, Gipson, Paynter-6. So the mo-
ton prevailed.
A motion was made by Clark that
the claim of w. r. Wilkerson in the
sum of $3.50 for bonding the City
Treasurer, laid over last melting, be
taken up and allowed, $50 on General
Fund and $3.50 on Paving Fund,
Tho rod being called on the motion,
the vote resulted:
Ayes-Clark, Devers, Farrar, Gar
tin, Gipson. Paynter-6. SO the mo-
ton prevailed.
Bill No. 80, by Gipson, entitled,
can Ordinance prohibiting the sale
or giving away of any intoxicating
liquors within the City of Caldwell
Idaho, providing a penalty for the
violation of this Ordinance, and re-
pealing all Ordinances or parts of
Ordinances in conflict with this Or
dinance was read for the first time.
A motion was made by Gipson
that the rules be suspended and the
readings on three separate days be
dispensed with and that Bill No. 80
be read the second time by title and
the third time in full and placed on
its final passage. The roll being
called on the motion, the vote re-
suited:
Ayes-Clark, Devers, Farrar, Gar
tin, Gipson, Paynter-6. Nays and
absent-0. So the motion prevailed.
Bill No. 80 read second time by tt
tic
Bill No. 80 read third time in full
and placed on its final passage. On
the question, Shall Bill No. 80 pass?
the roll being called the vote result
ed: