Belding banner. (Belding, Mich.) 1889-1918, 1909-10-21
INTRODUCTION BY PEARY.

Some of my reasons for saying that
DR.. Cook did not go TO the North Pole
will be understood by those who read
the following statements of the two
Eskimo boys who went with him, and
who told me and others OF my party
where he did go Several Eskimos
who started with DR.. Cook from An
oratok In February, 1908, were at
Etah when | arrived there in August,
1908 They told me that DR.. Cook
had with him, after they left, two Els
kimo boys or young men, two sledges
and some twenty dogs The boys
we're I-took-a-shoo and Ah-pe-lah. l
had known them from childhood. One
was about eighteen and the other
nineteen years OF age.
On my return from Cape Sheridan
and at the very first settlement !
touched (Nerke, near Cape Chalon) in
August, 1909 and nine days before
reaching Etah, the Eskimos told me.
In general way, where DR.. Cook had
been; that he had wintered in Jones
men at Etah that he had been a long
way north, but that the boys who were
with him, I-took-a shoe and Ah-pe-lah,
said that this was not so. The Eski-
mos laughed at Dr. Cooks story. On
reaching Etah, talked with the Eski-
mos there and with the two boys and
asked them TO describe DR.. Cooks
journey to members of my party and
myself. This they did in the manner
stated below.
(Signed) r. +. PEARY.
SIGNED STATEMENT OF PEARY,
BARTLETT, MCMILLAN, BROUP
AND HENSON, IN REGARD TO
TESTIMONY OF COOKS TWO
ESKIMO BOYS.
The two Eskimo boys, I-took-a-shoo
and Ah-pe-lah, who accompanied DR..
Cook while he was away from Anora-
tok in 1908 and 1909, were questioned
separately and independently, and
were corroborated by Panikpah, the
father of one Of them Q-took-a-shoo)
who was personally familiar with the
first third and the last third OF their
journey, and who said that the route
for the remaining third, as shown by
them, was as described to him by his
son after his return with DR.. Cook.
Notes OF their statements were TAX
en- by several of us, and no one of us
has any doubt that they told the truth.
Their testimony was mistaken by
cross-examination, was corroborated
by other men in the tribe, and was
elected neither by threats nor prom
1ses, the two boys and their father
talking OF their journey and their ex-
periences in the same way that they
would talk OF any hunting trip
To go more into details: One OF the
boys was called in, and, with a chart
on the table before him, was asked
TO show where he had gone with DR..
Cook, This he did, pointing out with
his finger on the map, but not max
ing any marks upon it.
AS he went out, the other boy came
IN and was asked to show where he
had gone with DR.. Cook. This he did.
also without making any marks, and
indicated the same route and the same
details as did the first boy
When he was through, Panikpah,
the father Of I-took-a-shoo, a very in
telligent man, who was in the party
OF Eskimos that came back from Dr.
Cook from the northern end OF Nan
sens Strait, who is familiar as hunt
er with the Jones Sound region, and
who has been in Commander Peary's
various expeditions for some fifteen
years, came in and indicated the same
localities and details as the two boys.
Then the first boy was brought In
again. and with q pencil he traced on