The Lake County times. [volume] (Hammond, Ind.) 1906-1933, 1909-02-25

she should naturally have enjoyed in
view Of her recently assumed relation
ship to said defendant and the supposed
objects of trip called the honeymoon.
That your oratrix was not taken to a
hotel by the said defendant but was
left. without means, to shift as best she
could for herself, or at best the defend
ant furnishing her a sandwich or 1eav-
ing her to go alone to the depot eat
ing stand or elsewhere to lunch there
on the hard. coarse and unwholesome
fare. such as depot rolls and sand
witches. while the defendant would HE
himself with drink and lunch accom-
himself with dring and lunch accom-
paniment found in such places"
A Honeymoon Famine.
But that was not the worst part of
the terrible honeymoon" as the COM
plant goes on to state that your ora
trix was continually obliged to. snatch
nourishment while on the cars, eat
coarse rye bread, meat and fruit, such
as she could get en- route, often-time
suffering from the demands of appe-
tite unsated and unsatisfied to the
point of near-famine, although the de-
PENDANT, Joseph Moldrafski, was abund-
antly supplied with resources so that
| he could, had he chosen to do so, have
| furnished both your oratrix and him
self what should have belonged and
| been furnished to and for a genuine
honeymoon trip"
| The complaint states that Constance
Moldrafski and Joseph. he rhusband
were married on the Goth day of July
1905 in the city of Chicago. The ora
tri was then a resident of the city OF
Hammond and the defendant resided
in East Chicago. They were separated
on Sept. and lived together for just
| forty days before separation.
Constance Moldrafski maintains that
during all of that time she and the de-
| PENDANT were married she was affec-
tionate, forbearing, dutiful and faithful
to her husband. On the contrary, she
says, he commenced exercising a course
of treatment that was unkind, cruel an6
| inhuman, which conduct steadily grew
worse, notwithstanding the palliative
and conciliating bearing of the ora.
trix.
Compelled to Separate.
She says that she was finally con.
strained to seek separation as a rem.
edy and safeguard. After her return
to East Chicago Mrs. Moldrafski say.
that she was confined to her bed dur
! ing the latter part of August and wa.
neglected utterly by the defendant
who even refused to call a physician
That the oratrix was a good and duti
full wife is alleged in that she cared 70
the offspring of her predecessor witt
the same assiduity and kindness sh'
would have exercised for the said chill
dren If they had been her own.
The complaint goes on to state tina
Joseph Moldrafsl1i has property in Eas
Chicago to the value of $4,000 an,
that his income from the rental of tina
property was from $125 to $3.50
month.
Now a Telephone Operator.
The oratrix states that she is nov
working as a telephone operator an
that the salary she earns in this man
ner is her only income, and that thi
ic so small that she is compelled t
look to her friends for support.
The complaint asks that the defend
ant be restrained by an injunction fror
disposing of his property. No amour
is specified as alimony, but that is lef
to the discretion of the court.
The complaint in this case is one 0
the most remarkable that has eve
been called to the attention of the ba
of this county. No so much for it
peculiar but elegant, phraseology a
for the remarkable story that is toll
of a most unusual honeymoon.