The Washington herald., 1909-04-07
DISTRICT COURTS.
cnnrt Of AnnenI.

court OF Appeals
Present: The Chief Justice, Mr.. Justice Van Or
CELL and Nfr Justice Robh.
Admissions: Wesley Brown. Ernest O. Root
Walter T. Hendricks. Clinton Z. ColTin. Charles L.
Robson. Oscar LAEicSs. and Claude W. Owen
No. 1851. The Fe-slson Contracting Company N
The Coal and Coke Railway Company; reversed
Opinion b. Mr.. Chief Justice Shepard.
No. 1879. MagrudeE vs.. Mcnts0ns-yi reys-ssd
Opinion By Mr. Justice Robb.
ls1i. McT1llat et a. Hooker; affirmed Opi--
ION b. Mr.. Justice Van Orsdel
No. 1866 District q Columbia Va Hauf; affirmed
Opinion by 1Ir. Chief Justice shepard
No. 1872 International Seal Compauy. &C. vs.
Beye-. r.: reversed Opinion By NJ Justice Robb
No 1913 American Security and nslst Cosnpany
Va Payne; AHMED Opinion By NJ. Justice Van
OrsdeL
No lasL United states ez rel Grib6,s ct a. v.
Secretary a Iutelio-; cairned- Opinion b. 8ir
Cnief Justice SAeysrd.
No, ls5Z Barber ct al. W Wuds e. al e1ec1-
tors; affirmed Opinion b Mr.. Justice Robb.
No. lsei United States CT rel TlrneT Ct a. "a
Se-etary q Iutei1r; affirmed. OTiaion b. Nh
Justice Van Orsdell
M. 1873 Moulton e, a. ~ Cornish: reversed
Opinion by Mr.. Chief Justice Shepard
No. 1875. J0rdon IS. O'Bdeu; affirmed. Opinion
BY 3ir justice Robb
No. 1878 Coopcr " United Security Life IN
slrzuos and Trlst Company e. al affirmed oTiu-
iou by Justice Van OrsieL
No. ieS. Baum e. al knahe & Co: affirmed
Opinion b. Mr.. Chief Justice Shepard
Patent appeal No So. IN re appheatioa q Nash
Hardware Company; AHMED Opnioa b. Mr. Jus
tic Robb.
Patent appeal No. Sc. Nelsoo ~ Fsucette; ar
fTmei. Opiui0n b. Dir. Justice Van OTsdesl.
Patent appeal No. 5i3 Biuthsnthal 4 BickArt -
Gigb.e hrs. q o.: ahlrne1 Opinion By NJ
Chief Justice shepard.
No. lss. Nash ct a. vs. Milford ct al; atznsd
Opinion b. NJ Justice Rob-
Patent appeal No So r. ". Johns MauTille
Company American steam Passing Company
affirmed Opinion b NJ. Justice Van orsdeIL
No. $50 Consaul e a. IS. Cta1rlings; appeal 70
Sgrreme Court q United States prayed b. Mr. O.
r. C0nsanl o. counsel foE appellant. allowed and
bod % sct as sIrsgsedeas Fixed AZ so
No l1a Garfield et Al IS. United States eN rel.
Ness. Richard A. Balliuger made party appellan.
herein In motion u Air. 7. " Clements. q
counsel for appellants
No. l9B GARFIELD e 81. United States q
rel Lowe e a.; Richard A. Balinger made PARTY
aQpeilsn. herein on motion q Mr.. c. Il. Merl-
lat a counsel for sppelees
No. s36 United States rel Tuner e A. "a
No. isss. james B. LansH Company ct al -
No. Iga Jaqustts. &C.. IS Capital Traction
Company
No. IslL AdamsSIou-oe Manufacturing Con
pony vs. MaTfarland e. a.. continued.
40 lssZ Philadelphia Company Is Wright
jacob N. Dickinson made party appellee on mo-
ton Of Mr. Morgan H. Beach. attorney for ap-
pellant-
No 1870 Gmpers et al IS Bucks stove &
Rarge Company; specially assigned for hearing on
Monday. Alrl o. 1909. On motion q J. J. Oar
lugton. q counsel Tor appellee
No. 1851 BallinFer IS. United States * rel Ness;
Argument commenced by Mr.. 7. ". Clements
for appellant continued by Mr.. samuel Herrick FOX
appellee. and concluded by AiE Oscar LaWless
for appellant. on motion sppeiler and appellant
allowed 20 fle additional authortles-
No. 1910 international Text Book Company IS.
District q Columbia: argument commenced b. Mr.
A. G.. Bentley for appellant. continued by Mr.
W II. White for appellee and c0ucudad by Mr..
A. g. Bentley for appellant
Original g. In re John ABRAMS; petition for
reinstatement grEnted Opinion b. M Chief
Justice Shepard.
No. 1888 New York Continental Jewell Filtration
mcnced by Mr.. J. H. Hayden for appellant
Hon. affirmed Opinion by Mr.. justice Van
OrsdelL
Assignments fer to-day
No ls5s. The New YORK Continental Jewell ~
tration Company vs. District q Columbia; on hear
inF. Attorneys, J. r. Hsyden-E. H. Thomas.
No. 1872. Pniiadelphia Company "a Secretary Of
War Attorney. Morgan Il Beach
No. 1857. Mayer American Security and Trust
Company 60 al Attorneys, Brandenb1rg 4 Bran
denhurg-W F. Mattingly and J. B. Larner.
No. 1891 Minnix Company vs. Smith 4 Bros.
Attorneys. F. b. Rhodes and Wilson & Barksdale-
4. W. Wheatley.
No. 1884, Ockstadt IS BoUles. Attorneys. Pad
gett & Forrest-L. Tohriner.
No I5 United States "a Mason. Attorneys.
=, ". Baker and J. Q. AdAinN