The Salt Lake tribune. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1890-current, 1909-12-11
Mill of Separation Grinds Both
Swiftly and Exceedingly
Fine.
MANY WIVES COMPELLED
TO SUPPORT THEMSELVES
''The Other Woman Figures in
One or Two of Days Do
nestle Tragedies.

district court Friday afternoon, in
rapid succession Practically all of the
dccrccs were ordered on the suhstaD-
tiatiou of allegations rs TO failure 10
support,
Cora T. Sanders was the first on
the list jn the afternoon. she was
given n decree from Arthur +. san
dcrs. having proved her charge of neg
lcct ou the part OF her husband 10 sup.
port her and $50 month aimony.
Lorraine * Roblcs was given II di-
yorcc from r.nrico Rohles They were
married in Portland, May g. 1905. Dc
sertiou occurred September 10 of the
same year.
Minnie Berlin failed in her suit. for
the present. because she had moi bcru
a resident of the state year prlor 10
The commencement Of the action. She
instituted proceedings in June of The
present year. when she had come. TO
Salt Lake City only in July of last
year. she and George Berlin were
married in Denver in juno, 1908. Her
husband. she said, WAS craftsman,
and had been employed in Oregon.
After thcr marriage IN Denver, she
said. she had given her husband money
to 90 back to Oregon. He was 10 send
for her. but he never did. She had
previously resided in Salt Lake. and
when her husband did not send for
her she came here again. The court
held that when she married her resi-
dcnce was where her husband resided,
and the. fact that she had given up
her residence IN Utah by going TO
Denver was held TO be bar TO the
action.
A Twice Married Man.
Mary II. Lancaster was legally sepa-
rated from Sidney i. Lancaster. They
were married in Corning, Ark. July
IS. 1898. July Is. 1906, she said, her
husband left her at Bingham Canyon
and has failed so provide for her or
earning 500 TO Sll0 month.
Mrs. Lancaster said she had heard
from her husband directly when he
was in Nevada. After that he went
TO Spokane and 10 Vancouver IDdi-
rcctly she heard that he was running
n grocery store in San Antonio, Tex,
and that he had married another wo-
man. She sent friend down 10 Texas
to find out about II and. sure enough,
the report was true. But Lancaster.
she said. became alarmed and loft for
other parts. She last heard about him
in Humboldt county, California. She
was granted the custody of her TWO
children.
Beatrice Thomas sued Albert Thomas
lhd.' ii's H'ldtSuN"'N Sbl - Ol''
They were married in this city De
cember To- 1902. DeSertion occurred
in January, 1907. Her maiden name Of
Beatrice Crismon was restored. She
also got 500 month alimony and $50
attorney fees.
A Case From Juab.
The ease of Cora b. Grautham
against James Grantham came from
Iuab county. The two were married
in American Fork in 1900 They lived
a year aud n half in Eureka, where
Grantham WAS miner. He was a
drinking man, said Mrs, GTantham. and
did not support her. There are two
children, aged ) and . years. respec-
lively. The wife's maiden name Of
Cora ID. Baker was restored She WAS
granted the custody of the two chill
dren and SO month alimouy.
Perry NJ; Stout proved that Tina
stout had been untrue To him. They
were married April 50. 1901. in Denver.
The husband testified that they had not
lived together since 1905. He said that
child had been born 10 Der in Ogden
III September, 1908. which died thirteen
days later. James Stevens testified that
he had frequently seen Mrs. Stout in
company with George Mclaughlin. aud
evidence. TINT Mrs. Stout had stated
that she was married 10 Mclaughlin
Inc divorce was granted.
With Another Woman
Hilda c, Fisher and Walter p. Fisher
were married in Pennington. Davis
county, September 10, 1905. On July
II. 1908, he deserted her. she said. and
went away with another woman, He
earned from 500 TO $3.50 = month as
a railroad fireman and engineer \
daughter Evcline, aged 3 years. was
,fI,- h.. a
month aIlmouy aud $50 attorney
fees. The defendant had $40 'sewcd
mp In the court s hands, and $2j of
This amount was devoted TO the first
installment of the ajmony
Marian h. Banks and Orville y.
banks were married September 1t.
1881, hut have not lived together for
eighteen years. Mrs, Banks S ground
ct non support was proved. There are
three children, all of whom are now
married. The divorce was granted
Lllhe Mess was gwen a decree Of
divorce from Albert II. Mess. They
were married May so. 1906. Failure
to support began in 1907. The defend
ant, the wife said. is employed as a
salesman 5 In the j. 7. Gardner company.
There arc no children.
Husband Out of Work.
Rosetta Young proved copcmsiveN |
thd' ddWcS llcnTN lOung Is not an in |
duStrious individual and, indeed. James
Henry corroborated her proof in this !
respect. They were married December |
10, 1907. and the husband left the wife |
October =, 1909. 4 baby boy was |
born September l3, aud two weeks he |
fore the child was born. the wife said. !
her husband cursed and struck her. |
-Four days after The baby was born he |
threw her violently against the door
aud injured her side severely. She was
granted her divorce, the custody Of the
chlld. S25 month slimony and $50 al
torncy fees
In connection with this case an order
had been made directing Young to pay
his wife So week temporary alimonv.
THIS be failed 10 do after the first pav.
ment was made, and be was before the
court on an order 10 show cause FRIDAY
afternoon. His wife said she had not
received the alimony, and Young said
he could not obtain work He had
tried hard 10 get Job, he said, but all
avenues of employment were closed
against blm. He did have \ consunino