Manchester Democrat. [volume] (Manchester, Iowa) 1875-1930, 1909-03-03
Deep : 81 4. shailow plowinr.

H. :
Deep or shallow Flowing.
In regard to the question of deep or
shallow blowing. according to w. r..
Gilbert, Of Canadian experiment sta
tion, 1t is essential to discriminate
clearly between deep blowing and deep
stirring. There Is a vital difference
between the two; SO much SO that,
whereas perhaps not one farmer In q
hundred could from his practical ex-
perlence urge the adoption of the form
er. there must be very few who could
not consclentiously speak fayorably of
the beneficial influences Of the latter,
Much, Of course, depends upon the
nature of the land, and particularly Of
the subsoil, but the stirring OF the lat
ter to a depth Of even two inches or
three inches below the ordinary fur
row can. scarcely fail to have useful
effect in promoting. the prosperity of
the succeeding crops, for the reason
that the plant roots to extend over a
large area require less exertion In
search Of nutrlment and moisture.
Obviously 1t must be 8 very friable
subsoil that would not derive benefit
from deep stirring at occasional in
teryals.
The objection to deep blowing, on the
other hand, is that instead Of loosen
ling the subsoil and leaving 1t where
1t was it brings 1t to the surface and
Involves the burying Of the more fer
tile top soil to a depth at which the
nutriment It contains is available to the
plants only after they may be said to
have emerged from the delicate and
precarious stages Of development
The new soil that Is brought to the
top would, In the course Of time, no
doubt, become as mellow in texture and
as rich In elements of plant food as
that which II has displaced, but GER
tain period must elapse before this can
be accomplished.
In the meantime, the farmer brings
this hungry soil to the surface and
incurs the risk Of reaping inferior crops
until by heavy expenditure in tillage
and liberal manurlng he has enriched
and refined the new surface soil.
Deep blowing, therefore, is in aver
age cases ito, be avoided for the two
fold reason that it involves diminished
yields and increased expenditure to
the farmer for at least one rotation.
Scientifically as well as practically
the bringing up of the subsoil to the
surface is disadyantageous. AS is now
generally known the fertility and yield
ing properties Of a soil are largely
regulated by the action of useful bac-
terra therein.
But for the presence and activity
Of the various micro-organisms in the
land crop production would be unproflt-
able, II not impossible, and consequent
| ly bacterial life may be said to con.
lstitute the very essence of fertility.
Having regard to this fact, 1t is neces-
lsary to consider the conditions that
lare most conducive to bacterial activity.
Numerous searching investigations
have shown that the fertilizing bacteria
are much more plentiful in the surface
of the regularly cultivated soil than in
the lower strata. Therefore, the i'm
portance of retaining the soil that
teens with bacterial life on the sur
face Is evident and indispntable.
| II this soil, In which the beneficial
micro organisms are constantly fulfill
ling their Indispensable functions, is
4 h,,rfa5 t,oIoxry co1I t,,s ,,,y,t NJ, h. -. :,