The White Pine news. [volume] (Ely, Nev.) 1906-1910, 1909-04-07

great magnates representing the COM
bined corporation wealth in the UnIl-
ed States.
Calling attention to what he said
were the jokers in the bill, Mr.. Ran
dali OF Texas. said the measure was
full OF fraud and deception.
Mr. Clark OF Missouri, argued that
every member had the right 10 vote
on the bin from A to u. If mem
bers insisted on tieing their hands,
he said. they could do so, but he
would not.
when you go back 10 your con
stitueuts. he exclaimed. don't be
80 cOwardly as 10 undertake to lay
this whole thing on Mr.. Cannon.
He called attention TO the out
fageous raises" in hosiery and gloves.
The house, he said, had right to
say whether steel rails should go on
tie free list. lie charged that the
delay IN bringing in the rule was for
the purpose of making trades. of
bulldozing and wheedling men on TO
the reservation.
Answering all the arguments
against the rules, Mr. Payne declared
that the Republican party would be
held responsible for the bill before
the country. He asserted that every
source Of information had been
sought in order that a bill might be
presented that would do simple jus
tee 70 the consumer and the laborer.
Responsibility on the Democratic
side, he said. was different. Ii the
Democrats had shown some diligence,
courage and patriotism. he said, they
would have presented to the country
their idea of a tariff bill. He defend
I'd the glove and hosiery schedules,
and declared that under the bill they
would be sold as cheaply as they
we're today. with American workmen
and better workmanship. He plead
ed with his colleagues TO look be-
yond their districts and for Gods
sake hasten the passage of the bill.
Mr. Dalzell moved the previous
question. but before the vote was an
nounced. Mr.. Clark of Missouri, NOV
ed to recommit the rule. and became
involved in a controversy with Mr..
Dalzell and the speaker over whether
the motion was in order. Mr.. Clark,
amid Democratic applause. quoted
from q former decision of Speaker
Cannon, holding that a similar mo-
ton 10 recommit was in order. In
an elaborate decision. Speaker Can
non held that the case in question
was on an ordinary rule.
This Is not an ordinary rule" he
said, and Mr.. Clark's motion was
oyerruled.
On the motion for the previous
question. the Democrats forced a roll
call The vote resulted yeas 1876.
nays, lSo. and previous question. ac-
cordingly was ordered.
Another rule was forced by the
Democrats on the adoption of the
rules. The order was yeas 1874. naws
175.
Twenty Republicans voted against
the rule and four Democrats for IL.
Speaker Cannon ordered that the
bill be taken up and considered for
amendments.
Mr. lFordney of Michigan, at once
moved to strike out the counteryail-
ing provision of the lumber schedule.
4 snag was Immediately encountered
by Mr.. Payne moving that the COM
mittee rise. This was for the pur-
pose of laying the bill aside and moy-
ing an adjournment. but the Demo-
Gratis stoutly resisted and availed
themselves of all parliamentary tac-
tics to thwart him.
Mr.. Payne's motion prevailed. 1872
to l46, and he Immediately there
after moved 10 adjourn. The Demo-
Gratis forced another roll call. The
motion, however. was carried and the
house adjourned.