The Washington herald., 1909-11-16
Supreme Court OF the United states.

-------s u AAlius nANlur - tlrtlt aftih-
way OF Hio. Hawaii: John s. Dawson. Of Topeka.
kans': Evan b. Lewis. Of Philadelphia. Pa: VIII
nam X Rummler Of Chicago. H.: T. Carroll
SeAaener. OF Reading Pa; Wilbur l.. Cummings.
O. seattle. Wash. William T. Beck. Of Spokane.
WASH. and Royal Victor Of New York City. were
admitted TO practice
No. z. Original. The United States Of America.
complainant Us. Joseph Z. Ship et al. Mr. So
Acitor General Bowers announced 20 tho court that
tIe deiendants. Joseph +. Ship. jeremiah Gibson.
Luther Williams. Nick Nolan. Henry Padgett. and
william Mayse. were present in court in Response
10 INC rule issHcd against them, and asked that
sentence 30 pronounced. These defendants were
then called 10 the bar by the clerk The Chief
Justice announced the judgment Of the court as
follows.
You joseph f. Ship jeremiah Gibson. luther
Williams. Nick Noln. Henry Padgett. and William
Mayse. are before this court on an attachment for
contempt
ION return to a rise to show cause you have pre-
Eented such evidence as you were advised and been
fully heard orally and on printed briefs. and after
thorough consideration you have been found guilty
lou have also been romitted sGeraly % present
petitions Tor rehearing and move that leave be
granted TO file thcm which, after consideration.
have been denied
The grounds upon which The conclusion was
reached arc set forth in the opinion fled herein on
Monday, NAY "a 1910. and need not be repeated
nor need We dwell upon the destructive consequences
OF permitting the Transaction complained o. % pass
into precedent for UNPUBLISHED contempt.
II is considered by the court and the Judgment
OF tho cogrt "a that punishment for the con
tempt You. Joseph T. Ship. Luther Williams and
Nick Nolan, and each Of yUu b. imprisoned for
the period Of ninety days. and that SOU jeremiah
Gibson. Henry PadEett. End Wiliaut Bayse and
each u you b imprisoned for the period If sixty
days in The Jail Of the District Of Columbia The
marshal Of This court Is charged with the execu-
ton Of this judgment"
No. sos. TT Psso and Nortleastern Railway Con-
1any. plaintiff in oIrur. vs.. Encdina Gutierrez ad-
ministratrX. Sc. I'm error % the supreme Court OF
tho state of Texas Indictment will
Opinion by Mr.. Justice Day
No. o. Clara Z. Sylvester 60 al. plaintiff IN error.
vs.. Tho State Of Washington; In cUor TO tho su-
preno Court Cf tho state q Washington: Judgment
AHMED with costs Opinion By 1ir. Justice
Holmes.
No. 32s. ElizaHeta " McGnvra e. a.. arDeIlauts
"a. Z. W. Ross as State Land Commissioner Of
the state Of Washington et al; arreal from the
United States Circuit Court q Appeals for The
Ninth circuit Decree rUJe-nd ~ tho cost Of the
appellants, and cause remandad 20 the Circuit Court
cf the United States for the Western district Of
Washington with directons % yacatc the decree
on the merits and 20 sustain The demurrer for
want q jurisdiction. AMI on that ground 70 dis
miss the Suit Opinion by Mr. Justice McKerna-
Mr.. Justice Holmes c1ncur3 in the result
No. 3 Albert Marbles. appellant, VS. Edmund
?. Creccy. CHEZ OF police Of the city Of SO. Louis
ot al. appeal fran thc Circuit Court Of the
United States for the Eastern district ~ Mis-
soun; order affirmed, with cCstA Opinion by Mr.
Justice Harlan.
Tho chief justice announced The following orders
q the court;
No, g. Samuel Barrier, r., plaintiff 10 error. vs.
Butte Consolidated Mining Company; fin error 90
the supreme Court q the State Of Montana. per
curtain; wit Cf cuur dismissed for want az iIris
uiction- Bate City Water Company ys. Baker JIG
L. s.. 10; HARE vs. Rice ~ L. s., Gl; Say
ward IS. Denny. rs q. S.. $50: Moran SIS. H0rsky
lb L. s., 95: BCals VS.. Conc. ls3 4. s.. 49,: Iowa
vs. Rude. Isl L. s.. s.; Stewart rs. Hovscr %
L 5. a5. Gatowood So. North Carolina. eG L. S.
Isl; Bschtel vs.. Wilson. ~ q. s.. Sc; Iowa Cen
tT9l Railway Company w. Iowa. l6o Z. S.. $50.
No. 553 Jerome II. ECmick & Co.. plaintiff In
error. vs.. joseph ". Stern and Edward b. Marks;
in error % the Circuit Court q the United States
Tor the Southern district az New York. Per clram:
Writ Of euor dismissed for want az final Judgment
McIAsh vs.. Rot. ln Z. s.. COL Pfaeizer Va Bach
Eur COMPANY OF Illinois. November s. 1850
No. $50 North Carolina Mining COMPANY appel
lant vs.. G.. r. Westfeldt 20 al appeal from the
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth
circuit. Per clriam Appeal dismissed for want
Of jurisdiction. Wesfcldt Vs. Mining Company. ld5
Fed. Rep. 7l6; application for ccrtiorari deui.d
April 70 1909 2lf T. s. DIS: application for appeal
denied May y. 1900. by the Circuit Court Of Ap-
psals: appeal granted June T. 1909. by one o. me
circuit judges who had not sat as member Of the
Court Of Appeals the hearing Of the case OF
Of tho application for appeal motion % set aside
the order denied August q. 1910, Naciaiien vs..
United States I3 u. s.. 2s3; Greeley va. Lowe.
l5 T. s., 81; IN ~ VIM. % L. s.. As. in re
Moore. 20 T.. s.. go
No co. Guaranty Trust Company of New York
appellant. VS.. Metropolitan Street Railway Company
ct al appeal from the Circuit Court og the United
States for the S0uhera district Of Nov YORK. Per
curtain: Appeal dismissed for want Of jurisdiction.
Carer vs.. Houston and Texas Central Railway Com
Uauv. 80 L. s.. 10; I'm re Lennon. ID D3: Cor
nell vs.. Green. le3 L. s.. .; Empire stateIdaho
Mining and Developing Company vs.. Haney, 85
L. S., &5; Goodrich Ferris. 2li L. s.. Il: Far
rel vs.. O'B1en. l93 Z. s.. 50: Louisville Trust
Company ". Knott l9l L. s. %. United States
vs. Chapman, receiver. ID. So. Bicn vs.. Robinson
receiver. ID. 49, Dclmar Jockey Club VS.. Missouri
20 u. s.. 81; and see in re Metropolitan Railway
RcceivCrship. rs Z. s.. %; Guaranty Trust Com
pany Metropolitan Street Railway Company I66
Fed. SO. l6S Fed. 97 10 Fed 255: H.. 615: ID
66; II Fed. 1919; ID. l0lj: ID. 1919; Morton
Trust COMPANY VS.. Metropolitan Street Railway
COMPANY 10 Fed. S56: Guaranty Trust Company
VI Second Avenue Railway Company III Fed l020:
Pennsylvania steel Company Metropolitan Street
Railway COMPANY. 10 Fed. 6r.
No. sl5. Guaranty Trust Company II New York.
petitioner. vs. Metropolitan Street Railway Com
pluy. et AZ;
No &C. Morton Tr1st COMPANY petitioner. ".
Guaranty Trust Company o. New York. ct a.: and
No 65L METROPOLITAN Securities Company. petit
TONER vs. William W. LAdd. receiver &c, TUti- |
tons for wits Of certioari 10 the United States
Circuit Court Of Appeals for the Second circuit
denied.
No. Sc The California Development COMPANY |
petitioner. vs.. The New Liverpool salt Company
petition for a writ Of ccrtio-an 90 the United
States Circuit Court q Appeals for the Ninth cir
cult denied.
No. 43l. Sarah ]. Eddy. petitioner. vs The City
and County Of San Francisco; petition for a writ
of certOrari 10 The United States Circuit Court Of
Appeals for the Ninth crrIit denied.
No. 655. Dering Coal Company. petitioner. vs. |
II. Ernest Hutton. administrator &c Petition for
a writ Of coTiOIar 20 the United States Circuit
Court Of Appeals for The Seventh circuit denied
No. as Capt John =. Martin ct al. plaintiffs |
IN error. VI. A. ]. West notion 10 dismiss OF az |
firm postponed 10 the hearing Of the case on its !
merits.
No. Il. Illinois Cert-al Railroad Company Of the !
State of Illinois. plaintiff I'm error vs. Robert w
Sheegog administrator q the estate Of John T. !
Shecgog deceased: motion 20 add 20 the record
herein tho proceedings IN the Circuit Court Of the
United States for the Western district Of Ken |
tuciy denied
No. 40 sras Pickett. plaintiff in error VI. |
The United States; motion % advance submitted |
by Mr.. solicitor General Bowers. for the defend |
ant 81 error.
United States; motion 20 advance submitted BY |
Mr. Solicitor General Bowers. for tho defendant |
IN error.
No, TO- Original tx parts: In the matter Of the |
United States petitioner; hearing on return 70 rule
set for Monday. January TO- 1910, in connection With
Nos sol and Sc motion OF Mr.. Solicitor Cen
erul Bowers for tho pctiuouc-.
Motion for leave 20 file answer q Obcrlin NJ 1
Garter. answer OF John b. Dash. and suggestion
that the petition herein has been Iuenatllrey Med
submitted By Mr.. John T. Daish in that behalf
No. G2 Commercial Mica Company. petitioner /
vs.. Mica InSlator Company: petition for a wit OF /
csrtioun % the United States Circuit Court oF /
Appeals Tor the Seventh circuit submitted hy Mr.
Joseph r Edison and Mr.. William T. Rmmler for /
tho petitioner. and b. Mr. William H. Kenyon for /
the respondent
No 60 Charles ". Morse. petitioner. vs. Tho |
United States; petition for a writ II crtiorsd 70
the United states Circuit Court q Appeals for the
Second circuit submitted by Mr. Martin W. little
ton Tor the pcuuoner with leave 90 Mr.. Solicitor
General Bowers. for tho respondent. % fle brief
within ten days.
No. 81. Liverpool and London and Globe 1nsur.
-.
q al: petition for a wit Of ccrti0rari 10 tho
United States Circuit Court q Appeals for the