The Salt Lake tribune. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1890-current, 1909-11-09
IN POLICE COURT

Crowded 10 its utmost capacity with
oil manner OF specimens Of the loisam
and jetsam OF humanity, Judge Bowman's
court presented a picturesque appearance
Monday afternoon. The feature OF tho
attendance was the larEc number who
had been hailed into court charged with
drunkenness, There were nineteen OF
these persons and one. by Eis peculiar
testimony, in answer 10 The questions Of
Judge. Bowman. drew term OF thirty
days - In @ the city jatl. When asked whet
he had money In the bank. He then re-
fused To produce evidence of the state
ment and was led away. TO jail
Mrs, lane Doe Adams. who is accused
Of disturbing the peace viii tell her Side.
OF the case TO the court. Wednesday,
May Stearn admitted that she had no
means OF support and was given loater
out of the city, which. the court told her
meant that she must leave In the short
matters, sentence WIN be passed upon
her this, Tuesday. afternoon at o'clock
II May persists IN remaining In Zion and
is caught after o'clock this. Tuesday,
afternoon she WI! serve six months in
tho city Jail.
Violet Allen pleaded not guilty to the
charge Of yesrancy and VIII have her
$50 bail
Thomas Moser. enlarged with battery
will tell his side OF the case to the court
Saturday. AS soon as the case was set
for hearing at least one-third OF the
spectators IN the room left, Mosei land
Cd in court through Il neighborhood row.
With sna,chcs Of wordy war ndulged
In occasionally between the opposing
counsel the Jensen Creamery company
was Dnally found guilty of selling adultcr-
atcd milk and was fined s100. The Grst
person called TO the stand was !. Nathan
Miller. who told the court thar lie had
nothing TO do with the handling OF the
milk except the delivering of II. He was
engaged in making the deliveries 10 the
Wholesale trade whom he was accosLed
by Deputy Inspector Tom Terrt who
stopped the wagon, took ont can and
then collected sample of the contents
The next witness called was Torill
who tolC the court just how he proceeded
TO take the sample and what he had not
done with IL after II had left his hands
The attorney Tor the defense at This point
went into the knowledge OF the witness
regarding the samplIug % milk and asked
a number of questions which were the
beginning of the wordy war that ensucd
from then until the conclusion of the
ease.
1t developed that Terril had been in
the dairy business both as the prophet tor
Of a milk dairy and as n retailer OF milk
dairy products. IL was also quite evident
that he knew how 10 take IL sample %!
milk out OF can lie did not know,
u
Kay sampler" is. but told the court that
he knew that he could get an average
sample by aSitating the milk in tho can.
Ii then became apparent 10 the persons
In the court that the attorney for the
dairy company would attempt to show
that an average sample could not be sec
cured by tho means employed
City Chemist Herman Harms was then
called to the stand and testified To tho
analysis containing butter solids much
below the standard, or to use the words
OF Chemist Harms. 80 far below the
standard that The Sample shows upon
analysis that one gallon Of water had
been added 10 every gallon OF milk i'm
that particular can" Immediately upon
this statement there began a technical
discussion OF methods Of analyzing and
sampling milk. This discussion was car
rlcd ON between The attorney for tho
creamery company and the city chemist.
who soon demonstrated To the satisCac-
tion OF the judge that he knew what hc
was talking about
w. T. Jensen then took the stand and
told the court and the spectators how n
creamery IL conducted and tho differ
cncc between the scientific samplng OF
milk as conducted at his place of busl-
ness and tl1" samplinG rs conducted by
the inspectors in the employ of the city. !
Assistant City Attorney Rogers objected