The Detroit times. [volume] (Detroit, Mich.) 1903-1920, 1909-06-15
GOULD CLAIMS HIS WIFE
DRANK TO EXCESS
ocon,inued from Page oueJ

Continued from Page one.J
!
grounds for demanding a legal separa-
I ton. The court finally ruled that
i "habitual drunkenness" would be justi-
! fcation but added Isolated cases.
however. would not be sufficient"
+ When Shoarn continued arguing the
court said. Il believe that not only
in the eyes Of the law, but also from
! the standpoint OF morals husband
should demonstrate with his wife
when she becomes audited 10 the uso
of liquor, but II she persists I'm drink.
/ ing. / don't think the law would com
pei him 10 continue the marital rela'
/ ton. | rule that the defendant NAV
produce. if ne can, evidence 10 show
that his wife was an habitual drunk
ard /"
Malloy was then asked to give
dates in 1906 when he saw Mrs.
Gould intoxicated lie said on july
IA, 1906. she was flushed and much
excited at Castle Gould Her tuomo-
lille had broken down and he coui,at
say ii it was because OF that or he
cause she had been drinking that she
twas flushed"
I "Were you close enough to her TO
smell her breathe"
"AltereatIons Must Stop"
Il didn't get any nearer 10 her than
! could help" was the reply This ip-
censed Justice Bowling. who snapped
out These alterations with ser
wants must be stopped"
The court then ruled that Gould 8
attorneys must show that Mrs. Gould
was intoxicated and that nothing else
would be permitted To be brought into
the record.
Continuing Malloy declared that
About the middle OF July he saw
Mrs. Gould under the influence OF IL
quor OF some sort
The following day he swore, she
I had champagne for luncheon r1nd rep
rimanded him. She was very excited
and rushed up stairs, and won't say
thai she lunged but she certainly did
not walk as she usually did"
He next saw Mrs Gould few days
later when she called him IAN inso-
lent puppy and liar.
Howard Gould will not have
TO answer TO the charges made
by his wife that he was crue!.
that he was n libertinc or that
he was an impropr person to live VITA.
Justice bowling late yesterday. after.
noon made the above Tuling ON mo.
ton OF Attorney Nicoll, fore Coutd,-te
dismiss the entire complaint Justice
Bowling held that the charge that
Gould was an improper person To live
with had not been proved AT all aRd
that the other charges had not been
proved To the satisfaction of the
Cour
The only charge OF which Gould
will be required to make defense
10 his Wifc's charges is that OF descr-
ton. The court held that If Gould can
prove that his wifcs mode OF lie
made necessary terms upon which he
offered to return 10 her, Mrs. Gould
would lose her case.
Mrs Gould. who has been on The
witness stand as her own chief wit
ness in her suit for separation from
her millionaire husband Howard
Gould. finished her testimony after
recess Yesterday when she swore that
she could not locate the roadhous =
she dined with Farnum She was
finally excused and Shearn introduced
a copy OF the Malloy contract which
! Has already hceu published Showing
he was TO have Complete control
OF all servants"
John A. Cameron. formerly employ
ed at Castle Gould testified Malloy
ordered him not 10 permit Mrs Could
10 use horses or carriages
Former Police Inspector BILLY Nc
LauchHn sworc Nicoll had him look
up Zig" Hawley 20 learn If he had
married Mrs. Gould prior TO her we'd.
ding TO Gould. "Hawley wouldn't
talk" he said. The former policeman
finally declared Lieut.. Peabody and
himself heard that Mrs. Gould was
married in 1882 in Baltimore 10 man
named Dawson"
so we went there to look at the
records and found nothing, he sail
tn crOss CONTAMINATION, Mclaughlin adj
mittcd he started his original invesi.
CATIONS 1T the request OF Miss Helen
Gould.