The Washington herald. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1906-1939, 1909-03-26
Equity Court No. 2.



No ates- Gardner vs. Chesapeake Bssch Rail
way Company: jun disagreed Attorneys w q.
Gardner and Z. n Hopewcll-McKenney & Elan
nery.
No. Sass Buckley ". Washington Gaslisht Com
pauy; on trial Attorneys. Gittings & CHAMBER
laia-R r. PeTTy 4 Son and Mckinney 4 Elan
nerT.
No a551 McNlulln vs.. Fowler. adninistra.or.
Gies-W O. Baldersou-
No. 5liS5. Webster Manufacturing Company -
American Loading and Unloading Machine Com
pany: order allowing plaintiff 10 WithdTaw note.
No -. JsnALss vs., CIy ard suburban Rail
way Company: verdict Tor plaintiff for $50 and
judgement forthwith. costs Attorneys, r.. ".
MckSynolds-G. p. Hoover and c. A. Douglas
Asanments for to-day-Motions. &c.
No / flnch ~ Souder- Attorneys. simmons a
White-Baldcrstou.
No. 2 Morris vs.. Met-opolitan Surety Company
Auorngs Hamilton. Colbert. Yerkes & Hamilton
DoCEias sheErell. ard DariingloE-
No. 7. Frsternsl Mystic Circle vs. United States
Fidelity and Guaranty Company. Attorneys. Lin
ton-Brandenbgrg 4 Brandeuburg
No. l. Du Pout de Memoirs Powder Company "a
shiplsy. Attorneys. Wheatlcy-Johnsou.
No. s. Saunders - Steven & Son Company. Al
t0rneys. NeHmyer & Totriner-I;irrey & Noodard
No. s. United States 70 use 4 Powers Regula-
tor Company. Va S1nb0n e. a. Attorneys. Bran
deutsaTg s. BFaudeuburg-Mckenuey a Flauney ard
Fay.
No. 2 Stewart - Anacostia and Potomac Rail
tague-Douglass & Hoover.
so. s d Bois "a Wiesersbam Atorneys. LEVIN.
Coidrca * fleming McRenuey & FianDeTy and
Hirz.
Company vs. secretary q Agriculture Attorneys.
Rea-Unitsd States attorney.
Circuit Court No. 2.
CHIEF JUSTICE CLABAUGB
/ Nc. E9s5, Glaseoe vs.. Capital Traction Company,
continued Tor term
No. 5a91l District of Columbia vs. Ge0rEUt0Wu
Z Gaslight Company. and No $3.50. District q Co
lumba vs. Washington Gasght Company. On trial
ATTORNEYS. r. r. Perry & son. h. H. Go.dsborough
I and C. T. DunloD-F n. stephens
Assignments for r0-dsy-Aiotious-
/ No. J. United States tx rel. Farley vs Secretary
No. United States FIDELITY and DEPOSIT
Company. Attorneys, ID. ". Baker-Doasl4s, Baksi
\ & Sheriff
Nc. 3 Robinson * son Va Laurel Clay Product.
I Company ATTORNEYS. Tucker & Kenyon and r. :
( hu.cezopeI-G- T. Dunlop.
No. Brown rs. seifndge. Attorneys. Lambert
I & Yeatman-Gordon : Ds'is
Z No. s Rossln vs.. District of Columbia e. al At
/ TONERS G. c. Gertman--Whre q Mcnamara.
No. 6. White vs.. Roper Attorneys. Gonnon a
/ Gies-Lambert-
No. 2. Magruder vs.. Flers- Attorneys. M0ultor
shea
/ No. s. Beldiag v. HeibeEser Attorneys, h. "
I WheaGey-Biney Woodard-
No. O. Halam vs.. Carothers. Attorneys. VOL
I & Roscnb,rg- Digs & Matthews.
No. l1 United States vs. Worcester e al Al
/ t0rneys j.. ~. Rakcr-Tucker & KENYON.
/ No. H. smith vs. Capital Traction Company
I Att11reys. r. W Iyes-PeTy & Son and Dunlop.
/ No. b. West vs. United States. Attorneys. B. L
I GasHns-D W Baker and Z. II Thomas
/ Nc. q Rosenthal vs.. He.denheimer. Attorneys
! Andres & Smith, TcbEiner-
No. T. Applestein vs.. Independent Steamboat
/ Company. Attorneys. Topper & GnsacE and Git
{ tings & ChambeFlaln-A- l. NeUmyer
No. IS. United States tx rel F-ackelton Sec
retary Of Interior. Attorney. samuel Herrick-
/ No. Is Baker IS. Warner Attorneys. H. Z
/ Davis and F. J. Hogan-J. J. Darin-.on.