Cameron County press. [volume] (Emporium, Cameron County, Pa.) 1866-1922, 1909-01-14
BIG STICK SlNASHES;
ROOSEVELT DEFENDS
THE SECRET SERVICE
In Message to House President De-
clares His Statements i'm Previous
Words to Congress Were Gross
ly Misunderstood.

headS or RepreSentat1V TaWney OF
Minnesota, Smith of Iowa, Sherley of
Kentucky. and Fitzgerald of New York
when the executive sent a special message
to the house of representatives, berating
those solons for being champions of the
successful move to place limitations upon
the scope of the secret service.
The president also declared that the
Interpretation of the house of the secret
service clause in his last message was
misunderstood. and had there been any
| evidence which would point to the neces-
sity of an investigation of members. such
evidence would long ago have been turned
over to the proper authorities.
The message was in answer to the res
olution transmitted from the house in
which the representatives asked for evil
dence upon which Mr.. Roosevelt based
his statements that the "chief argument
in favor of the provision was that the
congressman did not themselves wish to
be investigated by secret service men,"
Message of the President
and Reasons Therefor.
The message in part:
ITO the House of Representatives: 1
have received the resolution of the house
of representatives of December II, 190S
running as follows:
"'Whereas, there was contained in the
sundry civil appropriation bill which
passed congress at its last session and be-
came a law a provision in reference to
the employment of the secret service in
the treasury department. and
Whereas, in the last annual message
of the president of the United States to
the two houses of congress 1t was stated
In reference to that provision: 1T is not
too much to say that this amendment has
been of benefit only, and could be of ben
eft only. to the criminal classes" and 1t
was further stated 1.-The chief argument
IT,, fn,rx Nl,A -fs,fN AInA
congressman did not themselves wish to
be investigated by secret service men,"
and it was further stated: But If this is
not considered desirable a special excep-
ton could be made in the law prohib-
iting the use of the secret service force
in investigating members OF congress. IT
would be far better to do this than to
do what actually was done, and strive to
prevent or at least to hamper effective
action against criminals by the executive
branch of the government" and
Whereas. the plain meaning CT his
words is that the majority of the con-
gressmen were in fear of being investi-
gated by secret service men and that con-
gress as a whole was actuated by that
motive in enacting the provision in ques-
ton. Now, therefore,
"'Be It Resolved, That the president be
requested to transmit to the house any
evidence upon which he based his state
inentS lnat tn6 cnleI argument IN 1aVOr
of the provision was that the congress-
men did not themselves wish to be in
vestigated by secret service men,, and
also to transmit to the house any evil
dence connecting any member of the
house of representatives of the Sixtieth
congress with corrupt action in his official
capacity, and to inform the house wheth-
er he has instituted proceedings for the
punishment of any such individual by the
courts or has reported any such alleged
delinquencies to the house of represent
atlves.'
Cannot Understand Trend of
the House Resolution.
II am wholly at loss to understand
the concluding portion of the resolution.
/ have made no charges of corruption
against congress nor against any member
of the present house. If I had proof of
such corruption affecting any member of
the house in any matter as to which the
federal government has Jurisdiction ac-
ton would at once be brought, as was
done in the cases of Senators Mitchell
and Burton, and Representatives William
son, Hermann and briggs, at different
times since I have been president. This
would simply be doing my duty in the
execution and enforcement of the laws
without respect to persons. But I do not
regard 1t as within the province or the
duties of the president to report to the
mouse aleSeu ueHnQuencleS OF MEMBERS,
or the supposed corrupt action of
member in his official capacity Tho
membership of the house is by the con-
stitution placed within the power of the
house alone. In the prosecution of GRIM
inals and the enforcement of the laws
the president must resort to the courts
of the United States.
"In the third and fourth clauses of the
preamble 1t is stated that the meaning of
my words is that the majority of the
congressman are In fear of being inves-
tigated by secret service men and that
congress as whole was actuated by
that motive in enactng the provision in
question: and that this is an impeach-
ment of the honor and integrity of the
congress. These statements are not I
think in accordance with the facts
Declares He Said Nothing
to Warrant the Statement.
"a careful reading of this message will
show that I said nothing to warrant the
statement that the majority of the con-
gressmen were in fear of being investi-
gated by the secret service men, or that
congress as whole was actuated by that
motive I did not make any such state
ment in this message. Moreover I have
never made any such statement about
congress as whole, nor, with few in
evitabe exceptions. about the members
of congress, in any message or article or
not only deprecated but vigorously re-
sented the practice of indiscriminate at
tack upon congress, and indiscrimrate
condemnation of all congressman, wise
and unwise, fit and unfit, good and bad
alike. No one realizes more than 1 the
Importance of cooperation between the
executive and congress, and no one holds
the authority and dignity of the congress
of the United States in higher respect
than I do. I have not the slightest SYM
pathy with the practice of judging men,
for good or for ill., not on their several
merits, but in a mass, as members of
one particular body or one caste To put
together all men holding or who have
held particular office, whether it be
the office of president or judge, or sena-
tor, or member of the house of represent
atives, and to class them all. without re-
gard to their individual differences, as
good or bad, seems to me utterly inde-
fensible; and 1t is equally indefensible
whether the good are fonfounded with the
bad in a heated and unwarranted cham
pionship of all. or in a heated and un-