The Detroit times., 1909-01-29
Glazier Should Go to
ErisOn Rut Should
Not Suffer Alone
Lansing Jury Did Its Duty Well
Better Than Another Jury
Of Few Weeks Ago Did.


charge of Judge Weist
closing politics had nothing
case, either.
When Judge Weis had delivered his charge there posi-
lively hope evidence convincing that ne
I. HAD Incorporated the funds.
found guilty supreme shall hold
appeal the trial judge Michigan about to see
another mang go 20 prison.
There prison another entrusted with other peoples
money who took for his personal INTENDING TO put
back
They always INTEND to put back BUT THEY DO NOT
PUT 1T BACK.
disgrace but the DID, old
told and retod and again.
family wife, a and a daughter, and the case is
calls sympathy but Frank Gazer well
enough with world know where he to bring
the minute he his hand the first cent that did not belong
10 him.
There always and daugh
public has consider but whom the
guilty himself considers in time.
The Times is conderate of Mr. Glaciers family sympa
nhizes members, but THIS PAPER NEVERTHELESS
HOPES TO SEE GLAZIER LAND IN PRISON.
punishment though he
deserves punishment warning other occupying
responsible positions gift others who
with the handling of other peoples money
purpose punish the guilty. 1t is MORE
break the law did the
man who goes the penientiary.
This being the real purpose the law of what and of
society convicton
little respect for law in this the
Of rich because few of them prison and too few
them compelled complete their when do get
them there.
For the purity of government Michigan; protection of
of the of others lying banks
others placed in positions of trust by
general public LET GLAzIER BE SENT TO
PRISON FOR GOOD STIFF TERM AND LET HIM BE
KEPT THERE.
While Gaze less guilty, The Times has urged that he
blame for the loss suffered by the state and the
other depostors in the Chelsea bank
The testimony Of the banking commissioner at the trial
substantiated the contention of this paper.
that it inevitable.
he did fosee this he qualified for the posi-
ton he holds
He Gazer involved and he have known
at using of the in his personal enterprises
He told Gazer he would have reduce his indebtedness to
the bank
told him again, and THEN Glazier
didn't
What he should CLOSE the bank and
what little was in it.
Gov. Warner knew the condition of the Chelsea bank
he knew his banking examiner
Had his duty when he should have done it.
this banking commissioner continued his job
This governor remains in his high position.
H Glazer Justly found guilty and should be punished
But should he suffer alone?
justice when goes prison for his K
wrongdong and others guilty continue in places of honor
The judge charged that the only fact be considered
Gae had appropriated the of the to his
guilty of this oense within the knowledge OF
banking commissioner long before the bank collapsed
Should official guilty this OF deection OF
duty continued in his Office?
Or should who counnances his job such state
official be permitted to remain in his exalted position?
The jury which convicted Glazer did its duty we'll
jury which returned its verdict in the of Gov Warner
election dayhe jury the OF the State OF Michigan
failed meraby bring verdict accordance with the evidence
and the facts.
the OIL