Albuquerque morning journal. [volume] (Albuquerque, N.M.) 1903-1926, 1909-04-06

Wild 10 votes 10 spare. HotWlthsldHd
ing the desertion Of 20 republicans
-Four Of the sixteen votes came from
the Louisiana delegation who Likewise
broke away from their party.
Mr.. Clarke Of Florida. made an nd
dress denouncing Mr. Bryan and Bry-
anism, populists and populism and de-
claring ne would support the Payne
bin if it contained What his consti-
tuents wanted-a duty on sea island
cotton ana protection for citrus fruits,
pincapples, etc. His remarks led him
into an exciting |eolloquy with MT.
Randeil, CTexasD and other democrats
but he declared that having been in
structed by the legislature Of his
state and his constituents as to the
stand ne should take on the articles
mentioned he would D t violate his
obligation His whole attitude was
one Of defiance to the democrats Of
the house. Before the rule was re-
ported there were numerous speeches
on the bill.
Evidently referring 10 Mr. Clark
of Florida, Mr.. Pou (South Carolina
said that any nan who supported the
bill belonged on the republican side.
He likened Mr. Clark TO the Arab
chief who had surrendered his com
panions for a part of the booty
liemaricing that he placed his pat
fiotism above sclfishness. Mr.. Cush-
man (Washington) defended the spec
ial order. He warned the members
against putting lumber on the free
list.
Republican hand cla ps greeted Mr.
Fitzgerald tNoW York) the new demo
cratic member OF the committee on
rules. he said minority Leader Clark
had refused him time to speak. where
upon no sought and received time
from the same source as the minority
leader ana was that Mr.. Dalzcll
Whatever differences / may have
with my party as this in the house,
he said. II shall sottlt at an appro-
PIRATE time, | think TO my own salts
faction "
Mr.. Fitzgerald denounced the Payne
hin charging that it was not what it
was %purported to be-. The bill. he
said, did not cquallze duties. There
was no stampede of the idle rich, he
said, from the balmy resorts of the
south where they spent their win
tors
confident that the tariff was to
be revived by It's friends" he said.
this capitol has seen a complete alb
enc of the great magnatcs repre-
4cnting the combined corporate wealth
n the United State"
Calling attention to what he said
were the jokers IN the bin, MI. Ran
lell Crexas) said the moasurc was fun
u fraud and deception.
Mr. CLARK tMissourJ argued that
worry member had the right to vote
IN the bin from "A to H." II mcm-
)er.s. insisted ION tining t~hcln.~}sands.
he ,snid, they oouii>vfo 20 1ut ~He4 rTT6iiId /
not.
When You go back to Your con
'titucnts. he exclaimed. don't be SO
'owordly aus to undertake to Law tn.
whole thing on Mr. Cannon
Hc called attention TO the "outrag-
raises, in hosiery and gloves. =
Answering all the arguments against
he rule. Mr. Pa(sa declared HAT the q
.essps-~. ~. usr~~~ ttTTt ,~Svsa~'
.anAoa* %s~~- tHs'' r~-"~'fT rrTrr ~ ~ 1922. '.sY-r"s
rs He asserted that every fact and
very souic oTinformathon had been
ought IN urdur that,.a hlLL- might be
=,;.-ntt-e.-~14- ,--,7f -ccr >ssYf~."e .,-sSrxo
ice 20 the consumer ana the laborcr. |
responsibility ON the democratic side. +!
he said. Was different. II tho demo /
rats had shown some diligence. eour- |
.ge and patriotism, he said, they |
would have presented to the country /
heir idea of a tariff bill He defend !
q the glove ana hosiery schedules !
nd declared that under the bin they |
would be sold as cheapl" as they were |
oday with American Workmon ana |
cttor workmanship. He pleaded with 1
lis COLLEAGUES to look beyond their
~istricts sand for Gods sake hasten |
he passage of the bill
Air pazcll moved the previous sues
ion hut before tho vote was announc-
1t Mr. clark CAfissouri- moved to re-
ommit the rulc ana became involved |
q "a controversy With Mr.. pal2ell and
he speaker over whether the motion
I'm order Mr.. clark amid dem
cratic applause quoted from q for
ler decision of speaker Cannon hold
" a similar motion to rccommit was
] order. I'm am elaborate decision.
peakcr Cannon held that the case
question was IN an ordinary rule.
This is not an ordinary rule" he
1id, and MI Clark's motion was over
Iled
on the motion for the previous ques-
on the democrats forced the ron
tn. .
Tho vote resulted: Yeas 1926: nays =
so, u tho previous question ac- =
,rdngly was ordered. I
Another ron was forced ny the dem l.
rats ON the adoption of thriulc The q
der was adopted. yeas tg4 nays Il
Twenty republicans voted against :
c rule and four democrats for It,. ass d.
ilows Republicans Austin, Crcn- .
esecl Car,N. cooper. I%onroot. Morse D.,
ld nelson. wisconsin Dawson,
'ol. Haughtrn. Pickett. Woods. Hub
.rd and kendall. Uowa) HinshaN
"a Norris. ~Nebraskap -I4ndher4
iinnl Murdock. tKansas) Parsons. n,
york; pondoNcr. Washington a..
81 Young. tNIchD .t
Hroussard. Estopiuai ID,
and Wickliffc. O.aD.
the previous question. CeppIAr
and Wilson. NIinuD john IN
the republicans just named against
' motion. speaker Cannon then orr
red that Tho bin hc taken up and