Perrysburg journal. (Perrysburg, Wood Co., O. [Ohio]) 186?-1965, 1909-12-24
LEGAL NOTICE.

DdulGl d. DOOLu, anu DOObh,
his wife, (Christian name unknown)
whose place of residence is unknown;
the unknown heirs and devisees of
Daniel B. Booth, deceased, whose
names and place or places of resi-
dence are unknown; Luella Broomall,
Edith Broomall, Charles Broomall.
whose last known place of residence
county, Indiana, will take notice that
Elizabeth Broomall of the county of
Seneca and state of Ohio, as plaintiff,
did on the Sth day of December, A.
d. 1909, file her petition in the court
of common pleas within and for sai6
county of Wood, being cause No.
1882, against them as defendants.
setting forth that she is the owner in
fee simple and that she Is now and
she and her immediate grantors for
more than twenty-one years last past
have been in the open, peaceable, no.
torious, adverse and actual possession
of the following described premises,
to-wit: The southeast quarter of the
northeast quarter of the northwest
quarter, and the west half of the west
half of the northwest quarter of the
northeast quarter of section thirty
four (34), township four az north,
range eleven CID east, containing
twenty (2O) acres, more or less, all
in Portage township, Wood county,
Ohio.
That on the 29th day of January,
1896, Joseph Broomall, now deceased,
but then in full life, together with
Orget Broomall, his wife, sold and
conveyed by quit claim deed to Will
liam Broomall all of their right, title,
interest and estate in and to twenty
(20) acres of land, more or less, in
section thirty-four (34) township four
(4) north, range eleven (1D east, in
Portage township, Wood county,
Ohio, said deed being recorded in
volume IL, page 294 of the Deed
Records of Wood county, Ohio, and
that owing to mistake and the poor
penmanship of the scrivener who
! drew the deed, all that part of the
description in said deed which should
designate the particular part or parts
of said section conveyed is illegible.
That the premises So conveyed by the
said Joseph Broomall and Orget
| Broomall his wife, to the said Will
liam Broomall, was their undivided
interest in and to the premises first
! herein described.
That Notwithstanding the execu-
tion and delivery of the deed afore-
said the defendants, Orget Storm.
formerly Orget Broomall, widow OF
Joseph Broomall, deceased, and Luz
ella Broomall, Edith Broomall, Charles
Broomall and Mildred Broomali,
heirs and only heirs at law of Joseph
| Broomall deceased, claim to have
| some right, title or interest in and
to the premises first herein described
| adverse and hostile to the plaintiff,
but in fact have none.
That the said Daniel B. Booth and
- Booth, his wife, and the un-
known heirs and devisees of Daniel
B. Booth, deceased, claim right, title
| or interest In the premises first here
| in described adverse and hostile 10
the plaintiff, but the said defendants
nor either nor any Of them have any
right, title, interest or claim in or
to said premises or any part thereof
That the claims of the defendants
casts cloud upon the title of the
plaintiff to said premises which she
is entitled to have removed and that
she is entitled to have her title to
and possession of said premises quiet
ed against the said defendants and
each of them and all persons claiming
under them.
The prayer of said petition is that
the PLAINTIFFS title to and possession
of said premises may be quieted
against the defendants and each and
all of them and all persons claiming
title through and under them; that
the defendants and each and all of
them may be forever barred from set
ting up or claiming any right, title,
or interest In or to said premises or
any part thereof; that said mistake
In said deed of conveyance may be
corrected by decree OF said court and
for all other proper relief.
Said defendants are required to
answer said petition on Or before the
18th day of February. A. y. 1910, or
judgment viii he taken against them,
Dated December 8, 1909.
ELIZABETH BRooMALI..
Plaintiff.