Albuquerque morning journal. [volume] (Albuquerque, N.M.) 1903-1926, 1909-03-16

SIlAil uptlutt 10 pItNNht wv i''N''''
to recommt being made as provided
| In paragraph four OF rule NNVl,'
. After a bill which has been la-
yorably reported shall have been upon
either the house or the union calen-
dar for three days, any member may
| file with the clerk notice that he
desires such bill placed upon special
calendar TO DE known as the calendar
for unanimous consent. On days when
IL shall be IA order to mevc To sus-
pend the rules, the speaker shall, inn
mediately after the approval Of the
journal, direct the clerk to call the
bills upon the calendar for unanimous
consent
"Should objection be made to con-
sIderation OF any bill so called, 1t
shall Immediately be stricken from
the calendar for unanimous consent
and it shall not thereafter be placed
thereon"
3. Amend rule NVI by adding at
the end of paragraph four, the fol-
lowing:
after the previous question is or
dcrcd on the passage of a bill or joint
resolution one motion to rccommit
shall be in order and the speaker
shall give preference in recognition
for such purpose to a member who Is
opposed to the bin or joint resolution.
4 Amend paragraph four of rule
XXVI SO that II shall read as fol-
lows
"On each Wednesday no business
shall be in order except as provided
by paragraph four of rule XXIN, un-
less the house by two-thirds vote
shah otherwise determine. on such a
motion there may be debate not to
exceed five minutes for and against
"tTnder this rule bills may be call.
ed up either from the house or the
union calendar. excepting bills priv
iledged under the rules,
"Thls rule shall not apply during
the last two weeks of the session. II
shall not be in order for the speaker
to entertain n motion for n recess on
any Wednesday except during the last
two weeks Of the session"
The election of house officers pre-
ceded the action ON the rules.
Joseph G. Cannon was reelected
speaker, receiving 2Oi votes as against
eight for Cooper tWisconsin), two for
Norris tNohraska). and one each FOR
Esch. of Wisconsin, aud Hepburn of
Iowa, an ex-membcr An the demo-
cratic members voted for Clark. SO
that the scattering vote represented
the republicans detected from Can
non.
The whips from both sides We're
kept busy holding their followers in
the chamber Looking down from
the galleries was great throng who
had been admitted only by card. The
diplomatic and executive galleries
were filled to OVERLOOKING one Of
the most .ntercst,d apectniors was
Mrs. TAFT
All the republican caucus nominees
were elected. no changes being made
in the personnel.
The fight on the rules began when
Dalzcll tPennsylvania} Offered reso-
luton making the rules OF the last
house those for the present session
The democrats forced Il roll call on
the motion for the previous question,
the vote resulting 1874 to 1888, shutting
off debate Tho roll was then called
The resolution was defeated 1s9 toI
1893. thus accomplishing the success
Of the Insurgents.
on the Dalzcll motion to adopt the
rules the following thirty-onc rcpub-
licans voted in the negative:
Carey, Cooper, Davidson. Kopp,
Lcnroot, Nelson ana
Morse wisconsin, Fowler (Ncw der
sey): Gardner and Lowering tMassa-
chusctts); Grenna tNorth Dakota)
Hayes California; liolllngsWorth
ana Johnson tOhio); Madison and
Murdock (Kansas): Good. Haushen,
Hubbard. Kendall. Pickett and wood
Gowa): Hinshaw. Kinkaid and Nor
rls (Nebraska) Lindbroth, Davis,
stccnerson. Nolsted (Minnesota)
Poindextcr (Washington).
The democrats voting for the rules
were:
Riordan tNew YorlO. Broussard
CLouisiana) Estipinal tLouisianO
O'Connen (Massachusctts).
Representative Townsend (Michi- |
,an) voted present" under an
agreement with Representative RUS
sell CTexas)
Conroy. Fornos and Goldfoglc |
New York; and Moon CTenncssee), |
Who voted with the regular rcpubli-
ans on ordering the previous ques-
ion. voted against the adoption OF
he rules. The vote of Representa- !
I've Johnson (Ohio) increased the in
urgcnts' vote Of 80 on the previous
question 20 81 on the adoption of the |
'ulcs.
During the debate MT Fitzgerald |
md Mr.. CLARK. both democrats. be- |
.amo involved IN a sharp colloquy. |
ur. Fitzgerald had yielded TO the |
minority leader for question. but he |
proceeded TO PROFOUND it TO Mr. Dal- |
.cu. The New York member insisted |
hat II was an abuse of his courtesy |
md that the question should De ask
ii oc him.
81 am going 10 do n. and ! don't |
,aut any slack Jaw about II, either.
ctortcd Mr Clark
Il decline 10 yield" replied Mr.. |
ci.ze, raid. amid republican applause. /
MT CLARKE appealed To- the speaker
nat MI Fitzgerald actually had !
icld.d to him.
"Wcl. take 1t back said Mr. !
with some show Of tenn
yer
''You viii wish you had yielded.
vas Nh. Clark's roioinder
Mr Fitzgerald remarked that he