Daily Kennebec journal. [microfilm reel] (Augusta, Me.) 1870-1975, 1909-04-10
SUPERIOR court.
Verdict for Plaintiff in
Randolph FLOSS" Case.
Grand Jury Will Make lis
Final Report This Afternoon.
Some Of the New Civil Entries on
Docket This Term.

DOCket sniS Ieffls
Tfe jury in the superior court Fri
day III the boss case from Randolph
in which Michael Williams was the
plaintiff and Morris Chaser was the
defendant, returned u verdict in favor
of The plaintiff and assessed the dam
ages at STA, after a deliberation of two
and a half hours.
George W. Heselton of Gardiner and
Herbert L. Foster OF Winthrop APP
peared for the plaintiff and Frank L.
button and Benedict F. Maher of Au
Susta for the defendant.
fThe action was one of deceit in the
sale Of u horse by the defendant to the
plaintiff and the al damnum was
placed at $500. The case was on trial
for two days and furnished lots Of
amusement for a crowded court room.
The PLAINTIFF claimed that he pur-
chased d 4-year-old animal Of the de
fenda1t and that the horse was a
KICKER" The plaintiff also claimed
that he was confined to the bed for
eight weeks on account of kick ad-
minsteled by the animal, and several
Ing Iropensities.
The defence contended that the de-
PENDANT told the plaintiff that he fhe
defendall) had had the horse 10 days
and that the animal had kicked twice
ana the plaintiff said that he did not
care if the horse did kick.
County Attorney IIildreth stated to
lac
the grand jury would report early Sat
urday forenoon. 1t was the intention to,
report last evening but late in the af-
ternocn two additional matters came
up which We're presented to the con-
sideration of the jury.
The following are some of the new
civil entries on the docket:
Hiram A. Comstock of Vienna
versus Eugene ID. Ladd of Camden. an
action, with the ad damnum placed at
500, to recover payment on a promis-
sary note. Williamson & Burleigh "t
Augusta for the plaintiff
Edmond Doyon versus, Edward
Rodique. both of Augusta. an action
with the ad damnum placed at $500, to
recover on account annexed. Melvin f.
Edmond Doyon versus Odelon La
pointe. both of Augusta, an action,
with the ad damnum placed at $3.50.
to recover on account annexed. Melvin
f. Sawtelle of Augusta for the plain
tiff.
The H. G. Barker Company of Au-
gusta versus Mrs. +. +. Hurley Ok
Rockland, an action, With the ad
on,
account annexed. Melvin f. s;awtelle
of Augusta for the plaintiff.
William Young versus w. W.
Tibbetts. both of Augusta, an action,
with the ad damnum placed at S10o,
to recover an account annexed. Melvin
f. s;awtele of Augusta for the plain
tiff.
Mason & Hanson of New York
versus Claude w. Townsend and
Edwin H. Ingraham, both of Augusta.
an action with the ad damnum placed
at $500. to recover on account an
ncxed. w. II. Fisher of Augusta for
the plaintiff.
Andrew w. Benner verusu Augustus
Biaisdell. both OF Monmouth, an ac-
ton, with the ad damnum placed at
5000. to recover on account annexed.
f. w. Whitehouse of Augusta for the
plaintiff.
Charles \. Smith of Hallowell
versus +. w. Jordan of Palermo, an
action, with the ad damnum placed at
$40 to recover on account annexed.
Beane & Beane of Halowell for the
plaintiff.
Cushman Walker versus James a.
Ferguson, both of Hallowel, an action,
with the ad damnum placed at $50, to
recover on account annexed. Beane
Reane Of Hallowcll for the plaintiff
Albert A. Shea versus, Jeremiah
HAYES. both of HaloWcll, an action
with the adj damnum placed at SO
to recover on account annexed. Beane
g, Reane of Halowell for the plaintiff.
The Gray-Hildreth Company of
Gardiner versus Lcander Rand OF
Richmond. an action. with the al
damnum placed at 800. to recover on
account annexed Guy y. Hildrcth OF
Gardiner for the plaintiff.
Guy A. Hildreth versus O. r. Holt
both of Gardiner, an action. with the
ad damnum placed at 500, to recover
on account annexed for legal services.
Guy a. FIildreth of Gardiner for the
plaintiff. i
The Gray-Hildrcth Company OF
Gardiner versus Clair " Head OF
West Gardiner. an action. with the ao
damnum placed at $3.50. to recover on
account annexed Guy a. Hlldretn d
Gardiner for the plaintif1,
DR.. r. d. Smons of Gardiner versus
Frank Hersey of Portland, an acton
with the ad damnum placed at $l'o' 10
recover on account annexed for pro-
fessional services. Guy ~ Hlidreth OF
Gardiner for the plaintiff.
F. l.. Amesbury and II. \. Wakefield,
both of Gardiner, versus a. Is. Doug
lass of Richmond, an action with the
al damnum placed at 500, to recover
on account annexed. Charles a
Knight of Gardiner for the plalntlf.
A. r. Hayes and F. T. Bradstreet
versus Lucy E. Purnell all of Gardl-
ner. an action, with the ad damnum
nlaced at 500. to recover on account
annexed. Charles A. Knight OF GardI-
ner for the libelant.
n Potter of Gardiner versus
Horatio C. Allard of Litchfield, an ac-
ton. with the ad damnum placed at