The Washington herald. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1906-1939, 1909-11-06

ordered. Attoueys H. ". wheatey-Darr. P,yscr
No 55o6 stewart vs. Trinity A. NJ. Z. Church
motion 10 s-riko out plaintiffs replication % de-
PENDANTS first plea granted Attorneys. ID. B. Moul-
ton-Bimey < WoOcard.
No. 5lsss. INLAND V. sTeetman; motion fo- iudg-
meut oycru7led Attorneys. A. S. Taylor and ID.
O'C. Cauaghan-Leckis. FGlton s Cox.
No. 4STE. Redmond rs Bryan e. al hearing %
motion fur new trial continued. Attorneys. A. L.
S.nclair-H. F. Davis.
No NiI3 Thomas Us. De Winter et al. motion
% advance cause f1r trial o7cruled. Attorneys. j.
W. Beler-P. II Marshall.
No 5l.N United States, - Use American Eaam-
eed Buck and Tile Company, vs.. Hens Safety
Boiler Company. leave granted defendant 20 1ls
amended sfiayit a. defense. Attorneys. Rals,ou.
Sidd0nS & Richardson-BIlndcnilrg & BrIndenburg.
No 5s6 Someryils vs. Easley; motion % dis
miss ogerruled. Attorneys c. Hackett-John Ridout-
No sIzS. Tyss0vsn vs. r. il. smith Company,
motion FOR new trial 0verTuied and Judgment On
verdict Attorneys. Nathaniel & g. r. Wilson
Raiston q slddons and A. 5. Worthingtou.
No. OS5. Wind0iph " National CIV Bank;
molten for new thai ove1uied and Judgment on
verdict; appeal noted sgperedeas; bond. $4,000 At
/ formers. =. A. Bowen. j.. and w G. Gardiner
| Balston & Sid4ors.
No $3.50 Lyon VS.. smith; motion TO dismiss
/ cause 0ycrrulod Attorneys. John Bil9ut-J. Il.
Z Adriaans
/ No. uIoi. Herndoa Milling Company Vs. Lewis;
motion % retax costs oye-raled. Attorneys, Z. A
I Iord-E, II. Jackson.
! No lsg1 Onirato ". BaItimors and Ohio Ran
ruad Company: motion for lew trisl fled Attor-
neys. T. X. NlErEhAl. Dan. Feyser & Taylor. and
/ 4. F. Observation-Disclosures. Colbert, IeEkes Ham
itou.
/ No. s8sl Mark vS District Of Columbia: rule
retgrnabe November z Attorneys. Peuae6aksr
| Carus & Jones.
Assignments Tor November S:
No. I2. Metzger vs. Metzgor Attorneys Mcul-
/ ton and AIillan-WaIace. WorthinEtou. and DCCg.aA
] -
| ser & Tayi0r-H0ward & Mcnamara.
No. 81. Lohr 20 al. VS. Title Guaarty ard Surety
Company. Attorneys. BalderstCn-Glttings & Cham
/ berlin.
No is'. Levy vs.. Palmer. Attorneys. johnson
No. is5. s,aabus ~ Southern Railway COMPANY
! Attorneys. Pack. Hinton & Pac.z-Hamilton-
! No. 259iz. Mccoy vs. Vegetarian Meat Company
! ATTORNEYS Brosnsn & Hegarty-DiggS
/ No. III Block IS Keller AttorreyE Wolf
/ Rosenberc-Dau. Peyser & Taylor.
No. IS soudsr vs.. johnson AttJncyS MacEsy-
30 ia Hooo Us. CAPITAL Tr1cHoa Company.
| AttorueyS, Lecke. Fultou & Cox. and AioncTe-
/ Perry & Son and Dunlop
No. $50 United States 10 use Pittsburg Plate
! Glass Company. vs. Metropolitan Surety Company.
Attorneys. Johns1n-D0ugias. Baker d sheriff.
Circuit Court No. ?.
CHEF JUSTICE CLABAUGE.
| No. 51n Rudd rs. International Correspondence
University, security Tor costs 0ruCTeQ &c AJulr-
nevs LoCiCie Fulton a. COW. C Clephane-
( No. $500 Payons vs. Gordon; motion for new
triRl Oycrrulcd and Judgment on verdict; appeal
bond 500. Attorneys. 5. q. Giesy-W. Z. Lester.
No. 5o58. Whitman IS Washington Post Com
many; demurrer withdrawn, SC, Attorneys, T. c..
Bradley and A. S. WoFthipgton--C. Brown and W.
J. Lambert
! No. $3.50 DieudOnno vs.. WalGrOn: motion % set
of Judgment for Costs OTery-led- Attonsys John
RidOut-H. johnson.
No ssIl6 Ohio National Bank ". McEueni oral
examination q ganisheo granted. AttOrnsyA John
Ridout-H. T. Taggart.
/ No 5000 Dieudonne vs., McE1eni oral o1amina-
ton Of sarnishee oTeTrllod. Attorneys John Ridout
H. Boyd.
No 5leS8 Craig administrator vs. Parish Ct VI.
motion for bill Of particulars granted. Attorneys.
/ +. W. Hackett-H. Conrad and L. Robinson.
/ Assignments for November s:
| No A. Bennett vs.. CAPITAL Traction Company.
Attorneys. Mather & sweeDey-Pery & Son and
Dunlop
No % Lincoln vs. Southern Construction Com
pauy Attorneys. BrCvl-DuTall & DaYidge.
/ No ll6 McAnister Ltsner Attorneys Ham
ilton Colbert Yerkes & Hamiltcn-Tobriner.
( No AS. McDougau vs.. Capital Traction Com
pany. Attorneys. BOwen-Perry & Son and Dunlop.
No 10. Wiley vs.. City and Suburban Railway
Company. Attorneys Wolf & RoscnberE-Darling-
ton.
No lS2. United States vs. Collins Attorneys.
BaGer-Thomas.