Norwich bulletin., 1909-09-06
CRIMINAL CASES
Assigned for Hearing Before Judss
 6ennett-Short Calendar List.

The following is the list of crimi- nal cases, new and continued, that are to be heard at the term of court which day) morning with Judge William l.. Bennett on the bench; also the short calendar and trial list:
 Continued Cases.
 State vs. Matthew Kroll, robbery and assault state vs. John Lynch, cruelty to animals; state vs Alexan- der Dupre, receiving stolen goods; state vs. Adelaide Dupre, burglary; state vs. Eugene Osier, receiving stolen goods; state vs. Paul St. George, re- ceiving stolen goods; state vs. Adelaide Vamasse, statutory burglary (out on probation); state vs. Thomas German tion); state ys. Rober Miller, theft of horse; state Jeaza Pe%iiz, theft Of horse.
 New Cases.
 State vs. Charles Loomis, intoxica- tion; state vs. Dominica Rodgers, as- sault with intent to murder; state vs. Timothy Healey, intoxication and camping on private property; state vs. Dan Haggerty, intoxication and breach of the peace; state vs. Marga- ret Maloney, intoxication and vagran- . state vs. John Smith, intxoclation and vagrancy; state vs. John Coyne, in toxication and breach of the peace; state vs. Everett Harrington, statutory burglary; state vs. Cido Jendi, breach of the peace: state vs. Edward Austin, cruelty to animals; state vs. George McMadd, burning building with intent to defraud insurance company; state vs. Huntington Sandal, breach of the frn a. sault with intent to murder; state vs. Robert Saunders, breach of the peace; state vs. Joseph Duyea. breach of the peace; state vs. Joseph Benoit, as sault with intent to rob: state vs. The odore Langlois. assault: state vs. George Fuller, adultery; state vs. Ol- i've Laparie, sale to blacklisted per- son.
 Short Calendar.
 c. Joseph Peck vs. Ernest P. Ches- bro; motion for bond for prosecution. The Mechanical Appliance Co. vs. Ash CT Mangle Co.,; motion for permission to file bill of particulars. William Mc- Coy and Mary Mccoy vs. John Kelley; nonsuit for failure to file bill of par ticulars. Bartholomew Cote vs. Eu- gene Cote and Napoleon Roussea; de- fault for failure to answer. Mary l.. Graves vs. Israel B. Mason; hearing LII luOllOn TUT IlOIC SPtCAIC Sldlt- ment. Noe Caron vs. Latham & Crane ; hearing of motion for more specific statement c. l.. F. Richardson ct all. appeal from probate: that --1earance be entered for appellee and for leave | to answer if further pleading is re- quired Ida M. Beaudin vs. Medrick Beaudin; additional Torder of notice. William Scheel vs. Connecticut Co.,; motion for bond. Frank Bennett vs. N NJ Q p Hn af ffTNra for bond. Harriet S. Bennett N. Y. N. H. & H. R. R. Co.,; motion for bond Maude c. Lucas vs. John J. Lucas; motion for further order of notice. The Mercantile Finance Go. vs. Evans & Meekins; default for fail- ure to answer. Edward G. Wright, admr.. vs. George E. Tripp ct al: CD l interlocutory judgment of interplead- CT! CD hearing on plaintiffs motion that the several defendants be required | to answer and set forth their claims. Uncontested Divorces.
 Nancy M. Caffrey vs. Patrick Calf frey; Harry G. Holmes vs. Emily R. | Holmes.
 Trial List.
 To Jury: James NJ. Grant, appeal | from probate in will of William Ross; claimed as privileged appeal from -ro- bate of will; l.. k. Richardson ct al, appeal from probate: claimed as priv l ileged, class l., sub. B. Ferdinand Gi- irard vs. the Grosvenordale Co. Cal win Wilcox vs. Dwight ThraIl; Frank | Bennett vs. N. T., N. IT. & H. R. R. Co. Harriet s. Bennett vs. N. Y. N. H. & H. R. R. Co. William Scheel vs. the Connecticut Co., George F.. Tripps appeal from probate; claimed as priv - ileged because an appeal from probate of will.
 To Court.
 Mary l.. Graves vs. Israel B. Mason: Fred NJ. Cole vs. Uzam Bennor and Josephine Bennor; Newson D. Skinner vs. Alexander Burrows; Maria Prince vs. Herman G. Carver ct al: Esther | A. Phillips Ys. Thomas A. Baker et al; M. Eugene Lincoln vs. the Con- | necticut Co.,; E. A. & l.. G. Williams vs. w. E. Labelle.
 Double Header with HopedaIe Today The Drapers of Hopedale will come to the Providence street grounds to- | day (Monday) for a pair of contests with the Putnam team.
 The first game is to be put on this morning at l030 and the second at | the regular afternoon time. As these are the first games Put nam has played outside the league this l season and as the Drapers are rated