The Manning times. [volume] (Manning, Clarendon County, S.C.) 1884-current, 1909-07-21

! 6eS.S haze Issued orders AID are con-
/ terpla.icg cutting down numbers Q:
shade trees within said to"n. aad more
especially .he trees !rhic': are now
! Standing on keitt 81. in said Gown.
| ". That the said trees which pc
/ ti;:oaer believes it IS now the Intention
/ o; said respondents 20 cut down are 10
good condition and are perfectly health
! Is and vigorous growth and are OF un-
! tod value 20 your petitioner and resi-
dec,S on said keits ST. in tina, they ;urn
! iSh abuaGan; shade on said street: that
said trees have long been looked upon
as al addition 10 the said town OF Man
Mig il It's civic beauty. And the Pc
| titioner alleges shat the destruction OF
! said trees IS unnecessary for the Securl-
", welfare and convenience OF said
to*2 o: Manning or for preserving
! health. peace and order within the
same, but that the destruction OF said
trees IS being done IN L reckless. wan
Ton wi!ful manner in diSregart! OF the
rights OF your petitioner, and others, as
residents and property owners therein.
V That the petitioner IS without an
adequate remedy by law 70 prevent the
said destruction, ard that If the said
trees on said keist ST. are permitted TO
be Gu, down and destroyed. the said s..
will become extremely hot Z. and around
your petitioners home and the beauty
OF said 81. Will be absolutely destroyed.
Wherefore. petitioner pravS:
I. That rule be issued requiring
the respondent 10 show cause. II any
they have, why writ OF Injunction
should not oe issued from this court
restraining and enclosing the Mayor
and Alderman constituting the town
council Of the town OF Manning. their
agents and servants. and a.. persons
acting by. through or under them. from
cutting down or otherwise mut!iat!nS
or iniuring any of the shade trees IN
said ,own.
II. Ina; 40 order restraining the
respondents, their agents aud servants
from committing any OF the above acts.
Ill. For such Other and further re-
lie: Us may be just and proper
PCRDY S O'BEYA%.
Attorneys for Petitioner
State OF South Carolina. County OF
ClareoGon.
Coar, OF Common Pleas.
I. |. SaSnal, Petitioner.
against
2. s. Mouzon. Mayor. and others rs the
town council o. Msuains, Respondents.
ORDER
Upon reading the verified petition in
this action and on motion OF Purdv X
O'Bryau. attorneys for the Petitioner:
It IS ordered: Tha. the respondents
showed cause before me .: my chamber
!: MaoniuC, S. c.. co the SS5rd day OF
July. 1909, 81 II o'clock - n. why per-
manen, injunction should no: DC issued
enio!n!us and restraining respondents
herein from cutting down o: otherwise
injuriog any 0: the shade trees in the
town OF Manning
It is further ordered, that viii be
the further order OF the court, that the
respondents, their agents and servants
and al persons acting under them, or
either o. them, be and hereby are res
trained and enjoined from cutting down
or otherwise iniuring any OF
the shade trees Standing and growing
in the said town OF Ma.uing.
Let copy Of this order and the pc
titior herein. oo which this order is is
sued be served on the respondent with
on, delay.
JOHN S. WILSON,
Judge 0. the third circuit
At Chambers. Manning, S. c., July
lS, 1909.