Bisbee daily review., 1909-04-09
MOTIONS FUR
 REFERRING IN
 HIGHER COURT
They Will Be Heard at d, a:i- lourned Session of he 'u- rieme Cou | on Th.rticth of This Month.

Motions for rehearing have been filed in the office of the clerk of the supreme court within the fifteen days allowed and the rehearings VII be granted at an adjourned meeting of the court on April 30 in the following cases:
 No. 262, Territory of Arizona, ap- pellant, vs. Thomas c. Norris. re spondent, Yavapai county, motion by appellant. Two cases.
 2 No. 1909. James II. Work. plaintiG In errcr, vs. The United Globe Mines, a corporation. defendant in error, Gila ccuntyA
 No. 1647, Daniel Hankins et al, ap- pei ants. vs. Frank ?. Helms ct al, nppellC Ces, CCch SC county.
 No 1Os2. The Ar.z9na Copper Com rany, Limited. a corpOrati-n. appel laut, vs William Allen Gillespie, ap- pel'ee, Graham county.
 No. 1O57, J. w. Booth ct al., appel iants. ys. Frank Powers ct all, appel lees, Graham county.
 No. 105S, T F. Parish ct al, ap- peIlants. ys. The C'eneguita Copper Company. a corporation organized un- der the laws of the terr' tCry of Ar. zcna, ct al. appe lees, MaricOpa coun- ty.
 No. I061. Tie United Globe Mines, a corporation. appellant. ys. Gila county. and ". W. Br-OknCr, treas u-er and ex-Cficio tax collector Of Gna county. a~peTees, Cila county.
 No. 1862. Old Dominion Copper Mining Comuauy. a cgrpcrat on, ap' pellant, ys. Cia County. and W. w. Pr1oFn~r, treasurer and eX-oG'clo tax ccTector Of Gila county appellees, Gla cou7ty.
 No. 1863. Ariz-na Commercial Con Ter Company. a corporation, apnel- laut, vs. Cila County, and D R. VII 'iams~n. treasurer and eN-Cn GO tax ccTector Of Gila county, apFellees. Giia county.
 NJ. 1869. C-arles Clascn. appellant vs. Nick Matko ct al, appelle S, Pima county.
 No. 1O72. R D. McDona'd plaintiff in errcr. vs. II. \. Cox, defendant in error, Maricops countv. No. 1913. Ira Y. Salladay. an infant | deceased. for the use and benefit oI ] hte estate Of said q ceased infant | apreIIant. vs. old Dominion Ccppel Mining and Smelling Company. a l ccrpcrafi7n. arpeilee. Gila county. No. lO47, The Title Guaranty ana i Surety Company. a corporation. ap ; re'Iant. vs W. F. Nichols. a-pe lee | Maricopa county.
 1 No. lO75. Lizz D. Murphy ct al | appellants, vs. Joseph w. Brown 2
 all. appeHees. Pima county.
 No. IO77. Charles PickthaL. admir
 istrator Of tbe estate of John fd"i I Francis, deceased, anreuant aud pI
 reVee. vs. Albert Steinttld, appelle
 and appellant Pina county. No. 1O7S. The Worlds Fair Min'n Company. appellant. vs. Frank Pow 1 CTS ct a., appellees. Pima county. No 10S7. l.. J. Overlook. aDpeilan vs. Seth F. Hazard. appellee. G ch'se oou"ty.
 No 1OsS Alert Ste'n'eld ct al, a , relIants. vs. Charles Brass, appslle \ | Ma-icora coun'y.
 No. lO79. Len B"uv'er ct al., a
 pelants. vs. Mary Nielsen, admin' , frafor of the estate Of C@ri $ Ne
 sen in her own personal right, aDp' | lee Pima couutv- No. 1893. A. Sandoval ct al aDn' Ia-ts- vs. The TTuited States Fideli pn5 Guaranty CCmDanv. ccrpor , ti~n arreIiee. santa Cruz county. No HOO. Suiti. aDre laDt, vs. kil cf Ar'zona. apre-lee. Yuma . 7unty' No. f101. Abr Ste nfe'd. apr' . Ia7t. vs. l.. Zeckendorf, appellee Pm 1 county.