The Washington herald. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1906-1939, 1909-11-02
supreme oOurt OF the UnIted $500.

Supreme Court OF the United States.
PTcsenti The Chief Justice. Mr. Justice Harlan.
Mr.. Justice Brewer, Mr. Justice White Mr.. Jus
toe McKcnnA Mr.. Justice Holmes. and Mr.. justice
Oar.
Edwin T Rice. OF New York CITY; james J.
Toledo. Ohio; Evans Browne, Of Washington ID. c. /;
Francis s. Borden. Of Milwaukee. Wis; Dan NJ.
Smith. Of Chicago. IL; ". J. Pirre. Of Council
Grove. Ksns; and Charles Thomas Payne Of New
York City, were admitted TO practice.
No 6. John T. Reavis, appellant Jose
FRn1A e Al; Appeal from TIE supreme Court Of
the Philippine Islands: decree affirmed with costa
Opinion By Mr.. Justice Holmes
No. a. Saruh S. FAN. plaintiff IN error, vs..
Elizabeth Eastin; in error 20 the Supreme Court
Of the State Of Nebraska; judgment affirmed. with
costs. Opinion by Air. Justice McKenna. Separate
opinion by Mr.. Justice Holmes Dissenting: Mr.
Justice Harlan and Mr.. Justice Brewer.
The Chief Justice announced the following orders
Of the court
No. lS. Rand McNaIly & %. ct - plaintiffs IN
error. Va. The Commonwealth o. Ken =. by II. c.
Turner. county superintendent Of schools Of Barren
County KY; in error 20 the Court o. Appeals Of
the State Of Kentucky Per curtain: Judgment
affirmed, with costs Chsnte Trader, IS2 L.
S. no; Wilson vs. North Carolina, $50 L. s. 5S5
Central Land Company vs.. Laidey l53 L. s.
los. Bacon Texas l63 Z S. 81; Eustis vs..
Bodies. 10 L. S. 81: White vs. Loovy, Isl T. S.
o.: Electric Company Dow. l65 U. S. $50: Pierce
yS. Somerset Railway. III L. S. Cal; Shepard
Barron. - L. ;. $50; Rand. McNaly & Co. rs.
Commonwealth. Jos s. W. rs; same vs. same,
los S. ". sll; Commonwealth ". CHM & Co,
Ill Ky. ne.
No. e7 Northern Pacific Railway Company plain
tif IN error. vs. Fred Vase et uI: motion 20 sd-
vance granted and cause assigned for argument
with No, l95 one case.
No. N Yellow Poplar Lumber Company, peti-
toner. S. +. Chagman: petition Tor a witt
of csrtioran N the United States Circuit Court Of
Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. and parts
- e
files on account Of impairment and improper mat
tef.
No $50 Tho Northern Pacific Railway Company.
plaintiff In erTOr IS The State Of North Dakota
eX rel T. T. McCue. attorney general;
No. "a Great Northern Railway Company plain
III in error. vs.. The State Of North Dakota e1
rel T. +. MoCue. attorney general; and
No sos Minneapolis ST. Paul and SHult Ste.
Marie Railway Company plaintiff In error. vs.. The
State Of North Dakota eX rel. T. T. McCue. al
torney general motion 20 advance granted and
cases assigned for argument on Monday February
q, 1910. as ono case. after the cases already g
signed for that day.
No COZ Chicago. Burlington and Quincy Raj
way Company. petitioner. Is The United States
petition for a writ o. certoran 70 the United
statoS Circuit Court Of Appeals Tor the Eighth
circuit granted. and Cause advanced to BE- heart
with No. q as ono case.
80. 60. John G. Mcclellan ct al. potitonerS
vs.. John f. Garland. United States district judge
&c: petition for a write Of oortiorHh to the United
States Circuit Court OF Appeals for the Eight
circuit granted.
No. SD John A. Kuykendall administrator. &c.
petitioner. vs. The Union Pacific Railroad Company
fetidon for a writ Of certiorar TO tho Unite
States Circuit Court Of Appeals for the Eighth cir
cui. denied.
No si2 Tho United States petitioner rs. Auths
H. Freeman O. al petition FOR wit Of certiorar
10 tho United States Circuit Court Of Appeals TO
the Fourth circuit denied.
No eiA Thomas S. Novel; et al petitioners vs.
J. c. Mcbride. receiver &c. ct all petition for
writ OF csrtioran 70 the United States CIrc1li
Court Of Appeals for the Ninth circuit denied.
No So Jacob Kerrch OF al. petitioners, vs.. TIT
United States; petition for a WIT Of certi1rar q
the United States Circuit Court Of Appeals for tn
Ilrst circuit denied
No I. Original. The United States Of Aurrir.
eomplainant vs.. Joseph +. Ship q al; the mo
lions on behalf Of Defendants Ship. Gibson. WIZ
Jams Nolan. Padgctt, and Mayse for leave 70 III
petitions FOR rhearing herein are sgveraly denied
ard said defendants are ruled 10 appear before Ii
court FOR judgment on Monday. the 18th instant
No g. Original The United States a America
complainant N The People Of the State OF Ne'
York et al leave granted 20 hle stipulation ex
tending time 70 plead 10 tho first Tuesday in Dc
cc1nber next on motion Of Mr.. Solicitor Generu
Bowers for the oomplanant, and order extends
accordingly
No. 10 Original Ex pare: In the matter q
the United States petitioner: time in which {
make return 10 rne extended 10 November IS. o
motion OF Mr.. Solicitor General Bowers for n
petitioner.
No So The United States. appellant. rs. Obs
In NJ Carter 81 al and
No. so Oberiin NJ. Carter et al. appellants VI
The United States; motion 10 Advance submitte
by DIR. Solicitor General Bowers FOR the Unite
States.
No. H. Irrigation Land and improvement Con
psuy. appellant. vs.. Ethan Allen hitchcock Seer,
taTy Of the Interior; mandate granted on motto
81 Mr.. George II. Patrick for the appellant.
No cd The California Development COMPANY