The Montgomery advertiser., 1909-09-03
COURT WILL RESUME
FALL WORK WILL START sEPTEM-
 BIER 20.
Lisf of Cases To Be Heard During First week-Non-yury Cases Take Precedence At
 Term. es

|
 Work in the Montgomery County Curcuit Court will be resumed Septem- her 20. The first week of the session | will be devoted to non-jury cases. aud those on the calendar are:
 | Sept. 20-Richard TiIlis vs Nathan Greil: M. c. Stokes vs. Alabama Gen. trai Railway; Greil Brothers Company vs J. E. Johnson. N. J. and M L. Greii vs. J. E. Johnson: Greil Brothers Company vs. J. E. Johnson; U. Quni- tus Cohen vs. Mrs. M. D. Blob: A. !. Kaufman vs. Charles Drum; Clara Crenshaw vs. Adolph Abraham; J. E Trimbie vs. George P. Waller: J. c. Johnson vs. w. B. Patterson; James M. Parker vs. M. T. Slough: Mem phis Asphalt and Paving Company vs. Montgomery Traction Company: Hor- tanse c. Bunkly vs. Chas. B. McLaren ct al: Hudson and Thompson vs. Adol- phus Nelson: National Lumber Com pany vs. Wadsworth Retail Lumber Company.
 Sept 21-I. Pollock and Company vs
 4. F. Whiting, sarnishee; Gen H. Lester vs. Southern Mutual Life As- sociation: H. K. Watts vs. Montgom- cry Light and Water Power Company; W. D. Gaines vs. c. D. Kenny. gar pishee: |. Lasseter vs. o. w. NIX ct al; M. M. Dawson vs. T. J. Toole; F. A. Amesley vs. !. H. Parker. Earni- shse: R. D. Crawford vs. ola Mae and
 B. M. Vaughn; Alabama Chemical Company vs. Greil Brothers Company. garnishee: State of Alabama vs. Kent and Mark: Hill Austin and Company va. q. L. Harden and Company; Lum Machinery Company vs. L. Lasseter: k. T. Thompson ys. Union Central Relief Association A. Hubbard vs. Montgomery Fruit and Produce Com pany. two cases
 Sept. 22.-George Stowers. adminis-
 trator, vs. F. M. Eubanks; Southern
 James B. Allen vs. T. W. shackel-
 ford; King Thomas vs. A. J. Keynton: A. J. Keynton vs. King Thomas; Ellis Grant Furniture Company vs. T. $. Smith, Ellis-Grant Furniture Company vs. Niagara Falls Fire Insurance Com-
 pany: William Kenney vs. l.. Lasse- ter and Company; Cotton Journal Pub
 fishing Company vs. T. L. McCul- l0ugh; Matterson Alkali Works vs.
 Confer Lumber Company: Jos Burks
 vs. Busy Bee Cafe; Fruite Dispatch Company vs. S. M. Cassimus: State of Alabama ys. Steiner anc Lobmau;
 Epartan Mills vs. Fillmore ouilian and
 Company, ct al.; Frank Stoilenwerck
 vs. Mary s. and Aiva Fitzpatrick.
 Sept. 23-Annie Mae Coal Mining Company vs. 5. K. Williamson: Katie J. Rives, administratrix. vs. J. D. Mo- keitnen, A. M. WaoSWoTth bss oeAAoAS . and Orum Company.
 The jury cases have been set down as follows:
 Sept 27--George Ransdeli vs. Mont gomery Traction Company; J. M. Sui liyan vs. J. $. Pinckard. Albert Will son and Massey Wilson: steiner. Crnm and Well vs. l. B. yBoyett; J.. M. Sul- livan vs. l.. Lasseter; E. E. Forbes Piano Company vs. J. l.. Bennett; J T. May Company vs. Tom Price; Dave Johnson vs. Ellen Welch.
 l Sept 2S-B. I. Dahlberg vs. J. c. Shepherd; B. L.. Dahlberg vs. stan dard Lumber and Manufacturing Com pany; Elmira Thomas vs. Mary Hogan; l John Armstrong vs. Montgomery Trac- ton Company; c. H. Roquemore vs. Josie J. Walker, executrix; T. and M. Bowling vs. Montgomery Auction ana ] Salvage Company. ct al; B. Jones Loan Company vs. Jessie Allen: Merchants Bank of Durham vs. Alex Rice and F R. Whiting.
 Sept. 2s-Merchants' Bank of Dur nam ys. Citizens Light, Heat and Power Company; A. T. Newell vs. Ii. F. Dullin Company ct all; Dahlberg Company vs. Atlaptic Coast Line Rail- road Company; Holt Brick Company vs Western Railway of Alabama; l. Winchester a.xs. Western Railway or Alabama; Katie Johnson vs. l.. W. Hunter Hattie Eel vs. J. P. Ste- phens ct al.
 Sept. so---State of Alabama vs. Rich mond Lucas: State of Alabama vs. Os' car Safrold; State Of Alabaina vs. AL bert Brewington: State of Alabama vs- Jim Thomas; State of Alabama vs. Jim Walker.