Perrysburg journal. (Perrysburg, Wood Co., O. [Ohio]) 186?-1965, 1909-09-24
New Cases.

ner against Inc ttaruly ADle OH
Company in which Justice John H.
Schroeder gave the plaintiff verdict
of $14.00 and the defendant a yerdict
of four cents. The defendants claim
an Offset of S14.04.
Geo. E. Mercer has brought suit
against the City of Bowling Green
for the sum of $S65.5O with interest
from the 29th day of June, 1903. He
claims that this amount of money is
due him for material, labor and ma
chinery furnished to Deckard & Son.
as principal contractors, in the con-
struction of Lehman avenue. He al
leges that on the third day of June,
1909, he filed, as required by law, an
itemized and sworn statement of his
account against the said Deckard &
Son, with the board of public service
of the city of Bowling Green and
further filed with the county recorder
copy of an itemized sworn state
ment and that on the fourth day of
June, the board of public service,
through its clerk, Alex Williamson,
served copy of same upon Deckard
& Son. He states that Deckard &
Son did not dispute claim within five
days after the notes were served and
that after the 10th day of June, an
estimate on the improvement of the
street was made and payment fell
due upon the contract, but that the
City of Bowling Green did not pay
plaintiffs claim when the estimate
was subsequently made or within ten
days thereafter.
L. E., B. G. & N. Ry. Co., has filed
a petition in Common Pleas Court,
wherein it seeks to have the court
ascertain and define the mode and
manner in which its tracks shall cross
those of the c., H. & D. Ry Co. in
the village of Tontogany and for the
assessment of damages.
Suit for divorce has been brought
by James S. Frazier against Adelaide
Frazier on the ground that she wilful-
ly left him and has refused to return
dispite the alleged fact that he has
always provided her with food, shell
ter and clothing. They were married
June I'd, 1908, in Monroe Mich
James Frazier VS.. Adelaide Frazier,
Divorce. gross neglect. Parties were
married in 1908 at Monroe. He charg-
es her with deserting him, moving all
her property to Toledo, and leaving
their home, and since she refuses to
return he wants divorce.
In the matter of the application of
the L. E., B. G. & N. Ry. to ascertain
and define the mode and manner in
which it's tracks shall cross tracks
of the c., H. & d. Ry. in the village
of Tontogany and for assessment OF
damages.
Azor Thurston VS.. Geo. Mercer
Appeal. This case is brought uI
from the court of Squire Robinson OF
Grand Rapids township, where the
plaintiff obtained judgment of $67.2C
with costs for the use of steam
roller.
John Fenton VS.. Frank Campbell
ct al. Replevin. Plaintiff seeks to
recover possession of a 7-passenger
automobile, of which he says he is
the rightful owner and of which he
Is illegally being deprived. He also
asks for damages in the sum of $10O
Huebner-Toledo Breweries Co. We
Edward Bellamy. Cognovit note OF
$214S96.
Kady Bottonfield VS.. Paul Bottom
field. Divorce. Willful absence
Parties were married in Dec. 1901
but lived together for only six
months, when, she says, the defend
ant left for parts unknown. AS she
does not know his whereabouts she
wants a divorce and her maiden
name, Kady Beard.
The l.. E., B. G. & N. Ry. have
brought suit against Rebecca Mer
ct al, to condemn property in Ton
togany, where the road wishes to en-
ter.
Suit for divorce has been brought
by Geo. Hamilton against Florence
Hamilton on the ground of infidelity
and gross neglect of duty. They
were married Oct. 5th, 1895. and have
two boys and two girls ranging from
thirteen to six years old They have
house and lot at Rising Sun.