Watertown leader. [volume] (Watertown, Jefferson County, Wis.) 1909-1911, 1909-03-12
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS.

MADISON, Wis, March 9.-TSpe-
cial. The supreme court handed down
the following decisions:
15G-C V. Mcmillan, appellant, VS. city
Of Fond du Lac, respondent; reversed.
165-Guiseppe Meo, respondent VS.. Chica
20 q North Western Railway company, ap-
pellant; affirmed.
172-Peter Yezick, appellant, VS. Chicago
Brass company, respondent; affirmed
1S2-Lilian NJ. Day by guardian, respond
ent, VS.. Milwaukee Electric Railway &
Light company; reversed new trial.
ent, VS.. Erdmann Schulz, appellant AZ
frmed.
221-C. Beck company. appellant. VS.. CITY
of Milwaukee, respondent, and 222-George
Damman, appellant, VS.. city of Milwaukee,
respondent-Or dissolvng the Injunction
is affirmed.
223-John Kissinger, respondent. VS.. Her
man Neger, impld., etc, appellant; af-
frmed.
224-John Kissnger, respondent. vs. James
225-The Sanitas company, appellant, VS.
Frank Niezorawski. respondent; affirmed
226-Hackley National bank of MuSkegon
appellant, VS.. Peter Barry impld., etc, re-
spondent; reversed
22S-I. J. Rosenberg, appellant, VS.. r. A
Kinney, respondent; reversed
229-Martha Knich, by guardian, appel
liant, VS.. Milwaukee Bay company, respond
emf; affirmed.
28o-Gustav Goetsch, appellant, VS. Inter
national Harvester company, respondent;
affirmed.
231-Albert Ellinger, appellant. VS. Equit-
able Life Assurance Society of the United
States, respondent; affirmed.
233-A. L. Piotrowski, appellant vs.
Stanley Czerwinski, ct al, respondents; af
firmed.
235-In re estate of Sarah Lesser. de
ceased, Max Pereles ct al, exrs., respond
entS, VS.. Isidor Lesser, exr., etc; affirmed
236-Western Lime and Cement company
appellant, VS.. Copper River Land company
respondent; reversed.
237-John b. neckendorn, appellant, vs.
Charles L. Romadka, respondent: reversed
241-Winnebago Paper Mills. plaintiff. VS.
Kimberley Clark company, defendant (croSs
appeals; affirmed on plaintiffs appeal
242-Andrew NJ. Jacobson, appellant VS.
Thomas 5. Whitley, ct al, respondents;
reversed; new trial.
243~Joseph Rankel, appellant. VS. Buck
staff Edwards company, respondent; re-
versed, new trial.
244-Catherine Ryan, administrators etc
respondent, VS.. Oshkosh GaSlight company
appellant; affirmed
VS.. w. ]. Patterson. city clerk; reversed,
thereby affirming the decision of the board
january calendar-State case 141-St. An
thony Mining & Milling company, respon-
dent, VS.. John Shaffra ct al, appellants; at
firmed.
Charles w. Milbrath plaintiff in error, VS.
State of Wisconsin, defendant in error;
affirmed.
plaintiffs in error, VS. State of Wisconsin
defendant in error; rehearing denied
14-William Neale, plaintiff in error, VS.
State of Wisconsin, defendant in error: re
yersed. new trial.
January cale-dar-State No. Jonathan
S Ellis, plaintiff in error. State of Wis
consin, defendant in error; reversed. new
trial
January calendar No 1-Pauly Jail Build
ing and Manufacturing company. appellants.
vs.. W. Z. Collins, ct al, respondents; af-
firmed.
No, Emma S. Sarles. admrx,. etc, re
spondent, VS.. c., NJ. & st. z. Ry appel
liant; affirmed.
No. &C NJ. Ford. respondent VS. c. II.
Freeman. appellant: affirmed.