The Guthrie daily leader. [volume] (Guthrie, Okla.) 1893-1996, 1909-11-09
sMrv-sIx opINloNs RgNoEREn



cDntlnued froud oase one
The district COURT OF MuskOgee
county Is affirmed fin the election
contest easeS0f v. ] Randall vs.
". J Crnmp fsf the oftiee Of eoun-
y attornef Of Muskogee county, in
. favor Of crump. Toe trial eoslrt re-
fused to count ballots cast in GER
tain precincts. where hagrant viola
lions of the law were alleged.
The case OF A. A. Han vs.. ]. d.
Carter. appeal from the district
court Of Comanche county. Is re-
versed
In the case of Ross Bros. VS..
Young. et al. appeal from Craig
county. the court issued an order re-
qniring the plaintiff in error 10 file
within forty DAYS testimony which
had been omitted from the record IN
the case and ordered costs of the
suit to be taxed against the plaintiff
in error up TO date.
The Judgment entered in the dis
trict court of Noble county in the
case of Mary Alcorn et al vs.. c. f
Dennis. foreclosure action. Is af-
firmed
Newspaper Suits Dismissed.
The case of the state. ex rel Chas.
West, VS. the Kansas City Journal
and other newspapers in which suit
was sought to restrain the derend-
ants from selling and circulating pa
pers containing whisky advertise
ments is dismissed. following the
rule laid down in the case of the
State VS. State Capital company. In
which the court held that such ac-
tions are OF a criminal nature and
that criminal actions should be filed
The decision affirms District Judge
A. III Huston.
In the case of Westville vs. still
well. over the county seat OF Adair
county. the court holds that neither
OF the towns received a majority of
the votes cast in the election and
rat under the constitutions ,he COVER.
nor should call another election Jus
tees Dunn and Hayes did not sit in
the consideration of the case and
Justice Turner concurred in the con-
clusion only Of the opinion
The case OF J A. lie Flore. ct AL
Is. r.. l.. Haines. proceeding in
the district court of Craig county 10
set aside Judgment rendered at a
prior term, is reversed and remand
ed with Instructions
Opinions by Dunn.
In the case of Ft Smith and
Western Ry o.. VS.. Chandler Cot
ton Oil company which Is a suit to
collect excess freight charged the
Judgment entered in the Lincoln
county district court in favor of the
oil company is affirmed.
The Judgment of district court II
Oklahoma county is affirmed In case
OF wow Pierce vs.. State National
Bank OF Memphis, Tenn.
The appeal in the case of Mary A.
Wesley ct AL VS. Wesley Diamond
Is dismissed
The divorce case of Ed Baker vs..
Mary j. Baker is reversed and re-
manded to the district court OF Usage
comtyy4
The district court Of Muskogce
county Is reversed in the case Of
Douglas Pei4yman VS. "Kookey"
Brown
The appeal in the case az TT.
Smith and Western Ry. Co. vs.. state
National Bank of Shawnee, Il dis
missed yiN4
Because appeal was not taken In
time the case OF Cunningham Com
mission Co. VS.. the Rorer Mill and
Elevator company, appeal from Pot
tawatomie county. is dismissed
10 rf
Mrs. ] r. Stanley is reversed and
ramanded toaahe district court of
lfsiHDhensoco coHnty
The judgment entered in the dis.
trict court OF Seminole county in
case OF II NJ Tate VS.. Phelbia
Gaines Is reversed and remanded
Motions for retax of costs In case
Of I'd coombs and Sarah Coombs VS..
J. r. Miller and A. Walker vs. Bow
man We're dismissed.
Opinions by Chief Justice Kane.
Chief Justice Kane reverses and
remands the case OF the C. r.. I.
Z and Pr Ry. Co. VS.. the State of
Oklahoma. appeal from Garfield coun-
~, with instructions to dismiss the
case, holding that the court had no
jurisdiction in ;Ae case.
The Judgment of the district court
Of Oklahoma county in the case of
Walker vs.. Bowman ct AL is affirmed.
rhe sui wes an action brought by
the plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs be
low, for damages against an abstract
'rm for s2S5 for making out an In
correct abstract of title TO property
rhe action Of the district court OF
Marshall codnty In holding that un-
der Section 4402 OF the Arkansas
laws, in force in Indian Territory
prior TO statehood. an attachment
could be issued In mechanics lien
upon buildings on unalienated lands.
IN the case of Lulu Keel VS.. ID. w.
lngerson, Is affirmed
The case of Voegel and Sons VS..
7 l. Brauderick Is reversed and
remanded to district court of Coal
county for faulty instructions Of the
trial Judge.
The case of e. Schlegel VS.. ]. b.
LINK Is reversed and remanded TO
The district court of Bryan county.
Il Is a forcible entry and detainer
suit.
Tae cause Of the Bolen-Darnen
Coal Co. VS.. Robert Kirk. appeal
from the district court of Pittsburg
county. Is dismissed with instruc-
lions MOI 10 proceed further until the
case Is remanded by the United
States circuit court OF appeals.