davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09

No 16167
The State of Kansas.
VS..
Charles w. Arnold.
Appeal from Sumner County.
AFFIRMED. -se
Syllabus BY the Court Smith, J.
The law recognizes every form of in
sanity or delusion, which renders an ac-
cused mentally incapable OF knowing the
nature and quality of an act he IS doing
and that what he is doing is wrong, as
relieving him of criminal responsibility for
the act but no defusion or mental weak
ness which falls short of rendering the
mind incapable of such discernment obvi-
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09
No. 1873
The City of Clay Center


A L. Williamson and Eric H. Swenson.
Error from Clay County.
REVERSED.
Syllabu BY the Court. Porter. j:
1. In an action on an Injunction pond
only those damages which are the direct
and proximate result of the injunction are
2 Where. a temporary Injunction re-
strains city from issuing or disposing
of certain bonds for the purpose OF erect
ing and aupPng e se ELECTRIC e have bee
caused by the increased cost of machinery
and building material during the time the
Injunction remains in force are too re-
mote and cannot be recovered.
2 In such an action where it is alleged
the market value of the specific bonds
deprecated, the difference between the
market value of the bonds at the time TN, Lne
value at the time the Injunction is dis
solved is a proper element of damages
the depreciation is the direct and proKi-
mate result of the injunction.
f. Section 242 of the Code of civil Pro-
cedure which provides that no Injunction
shall operate until the party obtaining the
same shall give an undertaking has no
application to suits brought by or on be-
half of the state in the exercise OF its
s. Injunction being an equitable remedy,
p t that it it shall not issue until the
party applying for the same shall give an
undertaking to indemnify the defendant
from loss or damage occasioned thereby.
by or on behalf of the state.
g. Where a temporary injunction Is
granted by the district court in an action
brought by the state on the relation Of
the attorney general. which is afterwards
dissolved, and on the application of the
state the supreme court grants an order
continuing the injunction in force, pend
ing proceedings in error, on the condition
that the plaintiff shall furnish bond to
secure to the party injured all damages
sustained If it be finally decided that the
Injunction ought not to have been granted,
held that a bond executed under such
circumstances is valid and binding OBJ
legation, and an action can be maintained
thereon.
All the Justices concurring.
A true copy. --.
Attest: ID. A VALENTINE,
TSeaI1 Clerk Supreme Court.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09
No. 1884
The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Rail-
way Company

No. 1854.
The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Rail-
way Company
SiIas F. Hastings.
Error from Wilson County.
AFFIRMED.
Syllabus. BY the Court. Benson,
1. Statements of the cause of the in
jury in a notice given by an employe of
railroad company, as provided in chapter
341 of the Laws of 1905, may, when offered
in evidence by the company, be considered
by the jury as affecting the credibil1ty or
the plaintiff, as a witness: and this also
applies to his statement taken by the
company soon after the injury which
should be considered in connection with
his physical and mental condition at the
time as affecting his understanding; but
neither the notice so given nor the state
If1ent so made can be held as matter of
law to bar his claim.
2. Considering the nature of the plain
tins injuries whereby both of his legs
were broken, and the evidence relating
thereto, the award of $4,000 damages APP
proved by the trial court, cannot be set
aside by this court as excessive.
All the justices concurring.
Attest: D A. VALENTINE,
ISeaL1 Clerk Supreme Court
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09
No. 49,
Claude S. Peck, ct al.
VS..
Oscar o. Ayres.


REVERSED.
Syllabus. BY the Court. Smith. J.
]. In an action to quiet the title to
lands. a prior judgment qaieting the title
thereto constitutes no estoppei and is not
evidence against party whose claim of
title antedates the commencement of fhe
had no notice OF the tendency of the ac-
ton, was not a party thereto and was not
represented by guardian or otherwise
therein.
2. A husband and wife reside and make
their home upon a tract of land in which
the wife owns a life estate ana ne enjoys
the rents and profits thereof. Held, that
by emitting to pay the taxes 'on the land
and allowing it to be sold and conveyed
for the taxes and thereafter purchasing
a deed thereto from the tax title holder
he acquires no interest in the land The
transaction results only in a redemption
of the land from the tax sale
/ 8. AS against the divisees of an estate
in remainder, the possession of the estate
by the life tenant or by persons to whom
start any statute of limitation or pre-
scription to running during the life time
of the devisee of the life estate.
virtue of a quit claim deed only from his
immediate grantor, whether he be pur-
chaser or not, is not a purchaser In good
verse interests shown by the records in his
chain of title and he is bound to take
notice of all superior titles to the land
shown by the records or which might have
been discovered by proper inquiry. (John-
son VS.. williams, 81 Kan. 179; Goddard vs.
Donaha, AZ Kan. 754)
<, As against the holders of adverse In
terests who are strangers to his deed, it
cannot avail a person who has accepted a
to assert that at the time of his purchase
he supposed he was getting deed of
general warranty to the land.
All the Justices concurring.
Attest test oopS' D. A. VALENTINE,
TSeal1 Clerk Supreme Court.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09

No. 1854.
The Garrett Biblical Institute
VS.
Henry c. Minard and Robert Fowler.
Error from Bourbon County.
AFFIRMED.
Syllabus. BY the Court. Benson, j.
The evidence is reviewed and held to be
sufficient to support the finding that the
defendant, The Garrett Biblical Institute,
had actual notice of the tendency of the
action in time to appear, in court and
make its defense.
All the Justices concurring.
A true copy.
Attest: D. A. VALENTINE,
ISeaI1 Clerk Supreme Court.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09
FOR NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS..

USED AND REDUCED PIANOS
AND ORGANS AT GUILDS.
Never have we had SO muc f STOCK cEfo nor
today, but if you want first choice you
must come early.
$315 Buys 1910 STORY & CLARK; Pay
81 so weekly. -
$50 Buys a $3.50 FOSTER & CO.; Pay 81
So Buys $500 ARMSTRONG;. Pay 81
$50 Buys a 500 WEBER; Pay s1.75
s165 Buys $3.50 EsrEY. Pay $50
sis5 Buys a 1925 CROWN; Pay s1.@
PARLOR ORGANS
$65 Buys $S5 SCHULZ; Pay 81 weekly.
$50 Buys a 500 BECKWITH; Pay IS
SIS Buys a s75 SCHULZ; Pay rs cents
$s5 Buys a $40 KIMBALL; Pay Is cents
SIS Buys a $50 mellow; Pay 70 certs
SIS Buys a $40 LAKESIDE; Pay so cents
sis Buys a $ss CROWN; Pay so cents
Every square piano sold last week
Write for full information if you can not
call Mention the instrument that you
"l9I E B: GUILD MUSIC co.
722 Kansas Ave. Topeka, Kan.
FOR sALE-2 pool tables, complete. Geo.
D. Butts, 921 E. 9Th st.
FOR SALE-Young, gentle COW, giving 20
quarts. $50 ITS Logan st,
FOR sALE-1S inch Beckwith round oak
SIS West st.
FOR SALE-General illustrating course in
I. c. S. Will sell cheap. Address X,
care OF Journal.
FOR SALE-Cheap, two chair barber shop
and bath. 40S Kansas ave.
FOR sALE-Onice furniture, 1inoleum
1415&15, 4 shelve revolving. book case,
office filing case. Mrs. David Overmyer
FOR sALE-Good young team. weight
2S00; good young mare. 400; stylish young
driving horse. rs Topeka ave.
FOR SALE chair barber shop, cheap;
good business, in good town. Address
o. w, care Journal.
FOR sALE-one horse wagon, tongue and
shafts. 1907 jackson st
FOR SALE wood turning lathe, new
WALL PAPER slightly damaged by fire
at end of rolls. now selling at half price
Buy now and use later in the spring. c.
E. Lawson 2OS w. eth st.
FOR SALE-High grade piano, excellent
condition; will sell at a bargain. E. w
CraVer, 14OS w. 10th
Is PIANO BOXES. $500 to $500 each.
W. F. ROEHR MUSIC CO.. $50 Kan ave.
FOR SALE-Prairie hay by the ton or
batled by load or car load. II. W. Nc
Afee. w. 9Th. Bell phone 50.
FOR SALE@50o business cards for 81 g.
500 envelopes. 81. 3: 500 letter heads. $1E0
Sec them; first class printing az proper
tionate rates. Trapp. ia Kansas ave.
LOST AND FOUND.
AOST-Lead pencil. gold headed. at Rock
Island Feb. ?. Reward if returned to
Rock Island ticket office.
OWNERAYour fox terrier is at IT'S Clay
st. Call.
- ~ SD ~ IE Watch. can ana ldenti-
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09
JEWELLERS.

~~~~-@~~-~~>~~~--~~~%-~
JAMES B. HAYDEN, Jeweler and Opti-
clan. Complete stock of watches. diaa-s
monds. silverware,. etc. Eyes examined
and spectacles properly fitted
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09
LEGAL


ates the criminal charactersand penalty Of
the act,
All the Justices concurring.
A true copy.
Attest: D..A. VALENTINE.
CSeaLl Clerk Supreme Court
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09

No. 1885.
F. G. Jones and W. B. Washington
The Redemption & Investment Company.
Error from Sedgwick County.
REVERSED.
Syllabus. BY the Court. Burch. j.
A plaintiff brought an action in Sedg-
wick county to quiet his title to land in
that county against certain defendants
who claimed interests in that land only.
In the same suit the plaintiff sought to
quiet his title to land in Scott County
AGAINST certain defendants who claimed
no interest in the Sedgwick County land.
Held, the court had no jurisdiction over
the Scott County branch of the contro-
Yersy.
Ali the justices concurring.
true copy.
Attest: D. A. VALENTINE
TSeall Clerk Supreme Court.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09

No: 1886 $50
Myron Hayes.
Pc VS. 81
Joseph E. Funk ct al
Error from FiiITIey County.
1t.. REVERSED.
Syllabus. BY the Court. Porter. J..
., In this case, heidi that There was no
evidence showing that the wife
was the agent of her husband, and it was
therefore error to admit in evidence
against him her declarations and adn1is-
sions made III his absences
All the Justices concurring. e.a.1
A true copy. ~ -a sz.--
Attest: D. A VALENTINE,
LSeaLl Clerk Supreme Court.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09

70 WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
You viii take notice that my petition
for permit to sell Intoxicating liquors,
according to law, at my drug store at NO.
600 West First St, in the Fourth ward Of
the city of Topeka, Shawnee county, Kan
sas. is now on file in the office of the pro-
bate Judge of said county, and that said
petition will be heard before the probate
Judge of said county at his office in the
court house in the; city of Topeka on
Wednesday. the 10th day of March, 1909,
JoHN w. TAssET.IA Applicant.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09

FOR EXCHANGE.
FOR EXCHANGES room modern cot
! tage, 2 lots, no incumbrance, close In,
west side, for larger house farther out.
Address E. o. s., care State Journal
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09
No. 1882.
William F. Beedy,

No. 1882.
William f. BeedY,
William F. Reedy.
Error from Rawlins County.
REVERSED.
Syllabus. BY the Court. Mason, J..
l. A tax deed is not rendered void by
the fact that the certificate was assigned
by the county for slightly less than the
amount necessary to redeem, when the
discrepancy is occasioned by an error in
computation.
2. Where such discrepancy is traceable
to the amount charged. as interest the
presumption is that 1t resulted from an
error in computation
3. The amount of such discrepancy will
not be regarded as substantial if the in
terest charged is less ethan would result
from a computation in which the frac-
tions of cent are carried out in full
throughout, and greater than would re-
suit from similar computation in which
such fractions are rejected at every stage
All the Justices concurring.
A true copy.
Attest: D. A. VALENTINE,
LSea1.l Clerk Supreme Court.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09

No. 15.S14.
Richardson Gas & Oil Company
VS..
City of Altoona.
Error from Wilson County.
AFFIRMED.
Syllabus. By the Court. Porter, j.
Where a franchise is granted by a city
to a gas company authorizing it to furnish
to the city and its Inhabitants natural gas
for light, heat and power, in consideration
of which the company agrees to pay to the
city annually the sum of $500, a further
provision that such payments are to con-
tinue only so long as the gas company
enjoys its franchise without competition
is not contrary to public policy as tending
to destroy competition and create a mo-
no2Oly.
All the Justices cohcurring.
A true copy.
Attest: D. A. VALENTINE
ISeal1 Clerk Supreme Court.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09

No. $3.50
The State of Kansas
VS..
John T. Reed.
Appeal from Finney County.
70. AFFIRMED.
Syllabus BY the Court. Burch. j.
{ Sundry assignments of error considered
and held that no prejudice to the appel
Iant's substantial rights appears.
All the Justices cOncurrtng.
Attest: D. A. VALENTINE,
TSsaIl Clerk Supreme Court.
No. 16,046.
The State of Kansas
c. H. Wheaton.
Appeal from Allen County.
REVERSED.
SYLLABUS BY the Court Graves. ].
/ The crime defined in section A of the
crimes act being section 2029 Gen. Stat.
1901 is committed in the county where
the acts therein prohibited are perpetrated.
and the jurisdiction to prosecute persons
charged with such crime, is confined to
such county. ,.f-
p Where a person is charged with hav-
ing committed the offense above referred
to- in a particular county, and is con-
yicted thereof in the district court of such
county but no evidence is produced to
establish where the crime was committed,
the conviction can not stand.
All the Justices c0ncurr1ng.
Attest: D A VALENTINE
ISeaII Clerk Supreme Court
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09
NOTICE.

TO WHOM IT MAY. CONCERN:
You will take notice that my petition
for a permit 'to-sell Intoxicating liquors.
according to law, at my drug store at No.
4S1 Holiday street, in the Second ward
Of the city of Topeka Shawnee county.
Kansas, is now on file in the offlce OF
the probate judge Of said county. snd that
said petition Will be heard before the pro-
bate judge of said county at his office IN
the court house in the city of Topeka on
"Wednesday, the 24th day Of February,
Applicant.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09
LEGAL.
LEGAL
Published in The Topeka State Journal
February 9, 1901
SUPREME COURT SYt[ABL.
No, 16, 1874.
The State of Kansas, ex rel.

The State of Kansas, ex rel.
VS..
Original Proceedings in Quo Warranto.
Writ Denied.
Section II. aTtieie Of the Constitution
of this state, as amended in 1906, is pros
pective, and does not apply to. laws en-
not, therefore, required to- determine
whether laws passed before the adoption
of such amendment are in violation of the
constitutional provision or not.
All the justices concurring. -z
Attest: D. A. VALENTINE.
CSeall Clerk Supreme Court.
No. 5,6A
A. r. Jessup, Sheriff of F'inney County.
Kansas,
The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Rail-
way Company.
Error from F'inney County.
REVERSED.
Syllabus. BY the Court. Graves, ].
Where, in an action, pending in the dis
trict court, an order of attachment was
belonging to the defendant, and after the
return of the writ, the court entered judg-
ment for the plainfim and th maze an order
seized, was subject to attachment,---such
order of the court is binding upon all par
ties interested in the property taken, and
can not be set aside or questioned except
in a direct proceeding for that purpose.
All the Justices concurring.
A true copy.
Attest: D. A VALENTINE,
CSeaL1 Clerk Supreme Court
No. IL, $685.
The State of Kansas
VS..
Ernest Prather. r.
Appeal from Johnson County.
REVERSED.
Syllabus. BY the Court. Porter, j.
The playing of baseball on Sunday Is
not prohibited by section 225S of the Gem
eral Statutes of 1901 which provides that
Every person who shall be convicted
of horse-racing. cock-fghting, or playing
at cards or game of any kind, on the first
day of the week, commonly called Sunday.
shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor,
and fined not exceeding fifty dollars
All the Justices concurring.
A true copy.
Attest: D. A. VALENTINE,
CSeaLl Clerk Supreme Court.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09

ss - No. 10, 42b.
f. T.. Galley
c. c. Mills, Ben A Wood and H. A.
Lauman-
Error from Hamilton County.
AFFIRMED.
Syllabus BY the Court. Benson. J
l. Where a party to an agreement for
the sale of personal property, before the
time for performance arrives, expressly
refuses to perform it. the promisee may
treat such remuneration Is a breach. and
at once bring an action therefor
3 The finding of the jury that party
did so refuse to perform his agreement,
il sustained by competent evidence and
approved by the district court, cannot be
set aside in this court merely because
there was evidence to the contrary.
g. A Judgment cannot be reversed for
an ifnrnaterial variance between the plead
ing and the proof which has not misled
the complaining party to his prejudice.
All the Justices concurring.
A true copy. -.
Attest: D.. A. VALENTINE
TSeaIl Clerk Supreme Court.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09

No. 1903.
The State of Kansas
VS..
Charles Bovill. f-
Appeal from Cowley County. 81
AFFIRMED.
Syllabus BY the Court. Benson. j.
i. In a prosecution for perjury the judg-
ment of acqdittal in the cause in which
the perjury was committed is not adrnis-
sable to prove the DEFENDANTS innocence.
(The State V. Williams 50 Kan. S37 syl. u.
2. A party cannot after securing an ac-
quittal by perjury. successfully plead such
acquittaI in bar of a prosecution for the
perjury so committed.
All the Justices concurring
"a true copy.
Attest: D. A. VALENTINE,
ESeaL1 Clerk Supreme Court. g.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09
WANTED-AGENTs.

WANTED-Iive agents to sell the stock
OF The Collins Wireless Telephone COM
pany. IN every town in Kansas. Write
for particulars Address w. F. Bellman
Investment Co. Topeka. Kansas
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09

TRAERFER AVN GTOR aOR
MERCHANTS TRANSFER & SToRAGE
Co, packs. ships and stores household
goods. Tel. 11& Clarence Skinner. G11
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09

No. Is Si3.
Frank Hennis
Acid Bowers, F. E. Davenport. Nora
Bowers and The Doniphan. County State
Bank, a Corporation.
Error from Doniphan County.
REVERSED.
Syllabus. BY the Court. Smith, ].
l. As against demurrer to the evidence
of plaintiff and the claim that it proves
no cause of action set forth in the petition.
the petition should be literally construed
and if the evidence fairly tends to support
any cause of action, however inartistfca1-
" stated therein, the demurrer should be
overruled.
2. In action to which there are sew
eral defendants. If the petition literally
construed, states cause of action against
all of the defendants and the evidence
fairly tends to establish such cause of ac-
ton against one or more of the defend
ants. a demurrer by all of the defendants.
jointly to the plaintiffs evidence should
not be sustained.
AL the Justices concurring.
A true copy. --..s =. ....-s ...
Attest: D. A. VALENTINE,
tSeaLl Clerk Supreme Court
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09
No. 1924.
The, Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Rail-
way Company.

|, !. VS..
Francis w. Peck.
Error from Ford County.
AFFIRMED.
Syllabus BY the Court Smith, J.
l. Under the evidence in this case It
was not error for the court and jury to
set aside as invalid written contract of
g In an action for personal injuries
where the petition AYERS that the injuries
occurred through the negligence of de-
PENDANTS employees and through no fault
of the plaintiff. general denial does not
proving that he was not guilty of con-
trfbutory negligence. Contributory negi-
gence Is an affirmative defense and, to be
relied upon, must be pleaded and proven.
All the Justices concurring.
Attest: 'i D. A.sVALENT1NE,
.FSeaLJ 7--.re Clerk Supreme Court.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09
No. 1854.
w. H. Dewey

w. ID. Dewey
VS..
r. L. Bobbittset al
Error from Sedgwick County
REVERSED.
Syllabus BY the Court. Smith, J.
/. In an action for the recovery of
specific personal property, the defendant.
answering by general denial only, may
prove any defense whatever to said ac-
ton. (White vs.. Gemeny. a Kan. TAI /;
Street VS.. Morgan, GA Kan. So
2. Where the plaintiffs right of recov-
cry depends upon the nonpayment of a
promissory note when due, which note is
secured by a chattel mortgage on the
property in question, and the plaintiff is
an endorsee of the note and assignee of
the mortgage, the defendant may prove
an entire or partial failure of the con-
sideration of the note ID If the note was
transferred after maturity or (2) if the
plaintiff had notice of the defense before
the transfer of the note.
g. If, under the rule stated in the last
above section. the defendant prove an en-
tire failure of the consideration of the
note, he is entitled to Judgment; If he
prove a partial failure only the plaintiff
is entitled to Judgment and the measure
of his interest In the property is the diff
ference between the full amount of the
note and the sum for which the failure of
consideration is proven, provided such diff
erty in question
All the Justices concurring.
A true copy.
Attest: D. A. VALENTINE,
tSeal1 Clerk Supreme Court
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09
BUSINESS CHANCES.

WANTED-Good active partner with s. 900
to invest in well established business
Address Haste. care Journal.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09

COvTR ACTORS AND BUTIDERa.
M c. PLANK, gen. contractor. has an
office at 81 Kan. ave. Estimates cheer
fully given. IND. phone 15oO- Bell 1870
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09
rREw uYspr~saRV.

QUINCY STREET FREE DIsPENsAHx,
81 Quincy 81. Conducted by regulsr
icai service free. Medicine free In some
cases. Onice hours to p m. Cells
answered NIGHT or dav. Ind phone 1887.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1909-02-09
No. 15,776.
In Re Proceedings for the Disbarment of
Anthony P. Wilson and A. P. Tone Will
No. 15716.


In Re Proceedings for the Disbarment of
Anthony P. Wilson and A P. Tone Will
Error from Shawnee County.
AFFIRMED.
syllabus. By the Court. Smith, j..
I. The notice required to be served
Upon an accused by Section 400. General
Statutes of 1901, need not be a process
within the meaning of Sections 1 and II,
Constitution of Kansas.
2 Where two attorney at law are
which,. if proven, justify the disbarment
of each, it is not error to refuse a sepa-
rate trial but they may be tried together
and one may be convicted and one ac-
quilted, or both be convicted or acquitted
according to the evidence.
g. In a disbarment proceeding where
numerous specific charges are preferred
and the court finds the accused guilty
upon several of the charges and enters a
not be reversed if any one of the findings
is sustained by the evidence. Only one
penalty. disbarment, can be incurred
whether accusations be many or but one.
4. While the courts are not the curators
of the morals of the bar and should not
take cognizance of solitary imm moral act
of a member thereof, not amounting to q
crime and unconnected with his duties in
court. still, as attorneys are officers oil
the court, the courts have the inherent
power to disbar such as, by a persistent
course of immortality or dishonesty. bring
distrust and Feproach upon the admins
Attest, -, n, D. A., VALENTINE.
I IseaII Clerk Supreme Court. {
No 1924.
-.