Burlington weekly free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1866-1928, 1909-09-16
COUNTY COURT IN SESSION
September Term Began Yesterday
Morning, Judge Miles Presiding.
Entries Made in Cases on the Jury
Calcndar-Juries Called and In
structcd-Ncw Cases Filed
with Clerk.

Inc september term of the Chittcnden
county court opened yesterday morning
at ten O'Clock. Judge w. w. Miles of
Barton presiding. Sheriff James r.
Allen made formal proclamation of the
opening of the court and PRAYER was Of
Tered by Dr. c. V. GrIsmcr of the Meth
odist Episcopal Church.
THE JURY CALENDAR.
The docket was then called and entr,os
were made In the cases on the fury cal
cndar. as follows:
The United states of America VS.. the
United States Fidelity Guaranty com
pany. assumpst trial Indefinitely post
poned.
Moneal Dodge, apt. VS.. Anna T. Rail
lard. book account set for court.
Isaac +. Sharon. admr. VS.. Champlain
Transportation company, case; trial in
definitely postponed.
Buel Thomas and wife VS.. r. o. Strong
and wife, case; set for court
Charles a. Shortsleeves CONSTRUCTION
Co., VS.. Rose Lavigne, book account: set
for court.
Kate NJ Vaughan, guardian. VS.. Joseph
Agel. apt. ejectment motion to dismiss
John S, Wilkins. admir-, VS.. w. W.
Brock and L. x. Roselle. case; open.
T.. Henry Powell VS.. Bailey Granite
Co. assumpst no trial.
Leonard A. Johnson VS. ]. P. Madigan
case: continued
William p. Lund, exr., and Edward \.
Mead VS.. Central Vermont r. r. Co,
case: no trial
Howard A. Lewis VS. Paul Robinson
apt, trespass; trial.
Thomas ONeil VS.. Joseph Rosenberg
apt, assumpsit; open.
Arthur Lapont vs.. Fay X. Calkins as
sumrsit; motion for judgment.
Joseph Lamier VS.. j. II. Allen. replevin:
set for court
T.. \. Sunderland VS. Albert 8. Webb
assumpsit; motion to set for tria, at heel
of the docket
Annie +. Auclair VS.. Fred Bushey apt
assumpslt; trial. apt. filed motion 20 dis
miss.
f. F. Parent vs. Peter Bordo, assump-
sit, trial
Schaputs estate vs.. a. C. Hathaway,
case; trial, open.
Edward r. Hlldrcth, ct al. VS. Naomi
f. Hildreth. breach OF contract; trial.
W. p. johnson G. Co. VS.. Central Yer
| mont Railway company. case: trial.
Buel Thomas and wife VS.. r. o. Strong.
ejectment; set for court.
Charles f. Brown VS.. Spear Martin Fur
Co. and Burlington Trust Co.. trs, case;
discontinued settled.
Alice Holmes Sweet VS.. the r. & NJ. r.
r. Co.. case: motion for non-suit.
| w. l.. White VS.. Peter Gadhue. copy Of
| appeal; settled. discontinued
| Arthur d. Douglass VS.. Rogena A.
Reed. ass,lmpsit: continued
Leon Andrews by next friend, VS.. Clark
Rood assumnsit; continued.
| Frank b. Gillett VS.. w. c. Blanch, as
sumpsit; default entered.
John IIooney VS.. Anna McGettrick, apt.
| and tn. assumpsit: continued.
Hayes e. Bouchard VS.. Spear Brothers,
assumpsit; set for trial. motion to set at
| heel of docket
| Andrew Brothers VS.. John Donelly,
apt. assumpsit; set for court.
! Abenaque Machine Works vs. a. T.
Stevens, assumpsit; motion for judg-
ment
Charles Levin VS., Isaac NJ Hayes, as
sumpsit; trial
| Joseph Myers, ct al. VS.. Andrew II.
| Barrows, ct al trespass; trial.
| Robecca Agel VS.. Isaac Perleman, ct
al. assumpsit; motion for judgment by
default entered.
Samuel Rosenberg. by next friend, VS.
Louis Gotta. trespass motion for judg-
mcnt by default entered.
Scion and Hattie Robinson VS.. Waite,
Y, Ring. case; passed.
John J. Byrnes VS.. Arthur I.evanway
ejectment: continued,
Charles II. Stevens VS.. +. A. Jewett
assumpsit; doubtful
w L. Ring VS., Scion and Hattie Rob
inson, account: passed.
L. r. Brown VS. c. II. Howard, trover
trial.
F. E. Clarkson VS.. tho Central Yer
mont Railway company special assump
sit; trial.
Norman Bushey, by next friend. VS.
Allen Owen, trespass; trial.
Theo. F. Hopkins, trust. vs. Jane
H. Allen, trover; passed.
Hiram C. Bevens. VS.. c. c. Gillet'
trover; passed.
Daniel Manson VS. Michael Mckenzie
breach Of contract; trial.
Mary O'Sulllnn VS. ]. D. Yandow, case
trial doubtful,
Walter l.. Ring VS.. Scion Robinson
rcplevin, doubtful.
Peter Poland vs. Waiter l.. Ring
replevin; doubtful
Charles +. Spaulding VS. A. ]. Hath
away, assumpsit; continued.
spaulding & Kimball Co, vs.. JOSEPH
and Frank Niquette. and George + ant
Frank Graves. ass,impsit; default b,
principal defendant.
JURIES CALLED.
At TIE afternoon session Of the cour,
which began shortly after two o'clock, til