Watertown leader. [volume] (Watertown, Jefferson County, Wis.) 1909-1911, 1909-05-14
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS.
High State Tribunal Hands Down
Monthly Grist.

MADISON, Wis, May Ills Special. I
The supreme court today handed down
decisions in the following cases:
January calendar.
No. PIP. E. Mueller, doing business as
the Mueller company, appellant, VS. Leora
B: Burton ct al, respondents. Reversed.
No. 30. Flanders, respondent, VS.. Wash
burn Land company ct al, Appellants. At
frmed.
No. sos. W. Lamoreaux, respondent, VS..
Bayfield, county, appellant. Affirmed
No. SIS. w. LamoreauX, respondent, VS..
bayfield, county, appellant. Affirmed
No. S2-German National Bank of Beaver
Dam respondent; vs.. Bayfield, county, APP
No. Sd. a. Hemenway, respondent, VS..
American Bank Trust company, impld,
etc, appellant Affirmed
No. S4-El1 OFT, appellant, VS.. G. o. BOr-
ing, exr., etc, respondent. Affirmed; judg-
No. S5-Richard A. Herring, appellant VS..
E. l. Du POnt de Nemours Powder com
pany, respondent. Reversed, new trial.
No. S6-Robert NJ. Gray by guardian, etc,
respondent, vs.. Northern Pacific Hallway
No. S8-E. n. Gould ct al, respondents,
VS.. Merrill Railway & Lighting company
appellant. Affirmed.
No. S9-Lester Tilton ct al, respondents,
VS.. James l. Gates ct al, appellants. Judg-
ment modified and damages reduced to
$500.
spondent, VS.. Great Northern Railway com
pany, appellant. Judgment modified and
damages reduced to $1,000.
No. 91-Charles A. HOag, respondent, VS..
Andrew Naustad, appellant. Affirmed.
No. 92-In re will of Elder f. Jacobs,
John II. Jacobs, prepayment and respondent,
VS.. Louisa Maria Jacobs, contestant and
appellant Affirmed.
No. 93-Anton Schmitt appellant VS..
Gustav a. Seefeld ct al, respondents. At
firmed
No, 96-Robert H. Patrick, appellant, vs..
Elizabeth Patrick, respondent. Affirmed.
No. 97-EliZabeth Thomas respondent,
VS.. Thomas Williams, appellant. Affirmed.
No. 9S-In re will of Charles Heber. de-
ceased, Carl Heber, claimant and appel
liant, VS.. estate of Charles Heber, deceased,
respondent Affirmed
No. 99-James Mills eft al, appellants,
VS., E. F. Thayer, eZr., etc, respondents
No. 1Oo-John LIGHTER respondent, VS..
Elizabeth S. Theirs, ct al, appellants Re
verSed.
No 1o2-Charles D. Blanke ct al, re-
ct al, appellants. Reversed.
No. 104-Frank Klabunde, appellant, VS..
Elizabeth Kasper, respondent. Affirmed.
No. 1o5-In re special administration of
estate of John Tobin. deceased, Joseph To-
bin, appellant, VS. Marie A. Tobin, admrx.,
etc, respondent. Reversed.
No. 106-In the matter of the estate of
Michael Cleary, deceased. John Cleary, ap-
pellant. Affirmed.
No. 109-Joseph Jirachek. respondent, VS..
Milwaukee Electric Railway 6 Light COM
pany, appellant Affirmed
No. 111-Robert Suffering respondent,
vs., Heyl Patterson, corporation, APP
No. S-(State)-James Howard, plaintiff
in error, VS.. state of Wisconsin, defendant
in error Reversed
No. II (State)-Alternativ writ quashed
with costs against the relator.
AUGUST CALENDAR.
No. 192-Richard Avenarius, respondent,
VS.. Jacob Kornely, appellant. Affirmed.
No. 70 !State)-Joseph De Blazlo ct al,
plaintiffs in error VS.. state of Wisconsin,
defendant in error. Reversed, new trial.
No. STE. II. Palm, respondent, vs. w. J.
Probert ct al, appellants. Affirmed.
No. 23S-F. NJ. Hasbrouch. appellant, VS..
Armour Co. ct al, respondents. At
frmed