The Olneyville times. (Olneyville [Providence, R.I.]) 1887-1917, 1909-03-12
FUNNY POINTS IN LAW
Odd Problems With Which Courts
Have Had to WreStIe.
A QUEER QUESTION OF TIME.
Curious Provision In an Eccentric
Mans Will Upon Which Hangs the
Settlement Of an Estate-Are Duck
Eggs Eggs, and Is Skimmilk Milk7

Eggs Eggs, and Is Skimmlk Milk7
One Of the strangest problems ever
submitted to the decision Of the law
was that growing out Of the disposi-
tion Of the property of an Englishman,
the father Of twin sons. 1t appears
that this eccentric owned extensive
tracts Of land In Australia, the great
part Of which he stipulated In his viii
should go to the first Of the two sons
to attain the age Of twenty-one years.
The younger Of the sons had emil
grated to Australia, while his brother
remained I'm England, 1t so happening
that they were in opposite quarters OF
the globe when they came OF age. The
fine point involved In the case was
this: Australian time is some hours In
advance Of Greenwich, and therefore
the claim was made that the young
man in Australia reached his majority
before his brother at home had done
likewise. Which Of the two brothers
was legally entitled to the property2
The question is yet unsettled and bids
fair to afford employment for the ex-
ercise OF lawyers wits for many years
to come.
Another hard nut for the lawyers to
crack was presented by case tried In
Indiana some years ago. The question
was in substance, Are eggs eggs, or are
only hens eggs eggs? Ludicrous as
this may seem, the point involved
some nice shades OF meaning In these
words, sufficient indeed to carry the
case through several courts.
A man had ordered Of his grocer one
dozen eggs. He sent ducks eggs. These
were returned as not being what the
customer had asked for, but the grocer
refused to take them back. The GUS
toner, I'm turn, declined to receive the
eggs, and they were sent back and
forth so frequently for several days,
during which they became bad, that
finally the grocer deemed himself justi-
fled in entering suit against the Gus
toner for the value OF the goods.
The magistrate before whom the
case was first tried ordered the GUS
toner to pay, declaring, ridiculous as
It may seem, that ducks eggs were as
much eggs as any others. The man
appealed from this, and the next court
reversed the decision on the ground
that such an order as the one in ques-
tion tacitly implied hens eggs, 1t be-
ing pointed out that If any other CON
tention was allowed any kind Of eggs
might be sent, such as pigeons cana
ries' or even snakes eggs. That set
tied II.
In case I'm southern court this In
teresting question once came up: Are
the grandchildren OF man also his
children? In the legal sense this ques-
tlon is not so funny as 1t seems, mas
much as 1t has been seriously con
tended not only I'm the United States,
but in Great Britain as well, what they
are.
Is skinned milk milk? This point
grew out of n case tried I'm Arkansas
not very long ago. A man had asked
at n dairy for n glass Of milk to dunk
and was given skinned milk. for
which at the customers complaint,
the dairyman was fined. In n higher
court. however, this decision was re-
versed, 1t being contended that skim
med milk was really much more milk
than milk that was not skinned, for
the reason that the latter contained
something that was not milk at all
viz, cream.
Some Of the oldest points at law are
those growing out of the tender pas
sion. A judge in a western court was
once called on to determine the hour
at which evening courtship should
cease. The circumstances were these:
A merchant had become much con-
cerned at the late hour at which his
daughters lover fingered with her at
the parental abode and so sought the
aid Of the law to expedite the young
mans time of departure.
In delivering his decree the learned
Judge declared that IL o'clock p. IN.
was the latest hour at which any
young man, fance or not. should be
tolerated In the young woman's home
and that after such hour the parents
would be entirely justified In forcibly
ejecting him.
A queer case once turned up In a
New England town. A young man had
embraced his sweetheart so vigorously
that he seriously injured her ribs. II
he suffered any mental anguish as the
result of this contretemps, so likewise
did he suffer In pocket, for as the re-
suit Of an action brought against him
by the young woman the youth was
fined in the sum of $500 damages for
the injury done the girls ribs.
New England also affords this anus
ing case: A young Lothario OF Maine
during the course Of his courtship was
each evening Hospitality entertained at
supper by his sweetheart. Some time
afterward. his ardor cooling, the young
man sought other fields to conquer,
Then what should the young woman
do but sue the young man who had
been so bountifully entertained for OBJ