Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1909-06-11

The substitute was defeated by q
vote of 3asto AZ, with the same q VISION i
that had been shown In the previous, ,..ls
vote. Offering othe. am elldi.iSsi ", Y :.
Doll liver said IL, strt, eNacI 9 pies ~
| paragrapfs reported by the coitinliS. sS
| on finance in 4 SIS, IA few months prior
Ito the enactment o he MCKINLEY law
and then approved by both senator
a lricIi and ti,s late Senator alliso 2,
He hoped That heir antiquity and the
ai,t.lo!;ity that had obeen behind them
Nronit rscommeiid them 70 senator's!
3el But tlios. were voted down.
Eejectiils Is su gges ton bas' NJ r. GlaI,p !
thai all 81 his amendments bearing
on the Wool schedule and Tor the same
general purpos. OF those previously
offered be presented and voted on ,DS
one recall. Mr.. DolliYei proceed ed
to offer tn EN- one by one. demanding
a rolleali on each. The vo ties deyeto OPP
ed no change9of party5lines from 3thats
shown by the first vote ken 58IterS
the senate met today.
Becoming engaged with Mr.s carter IN
Ia debate on the protective tariff sss-
tenn as the subject Mr.. Bacon de-
Bclared he would place the wool indus
try Jill Montana on the same basis as \
the cotton industry of Georgi.t and
would not tax the people OF Georgia
To allow the sheepherders in Montana
ito liNe3in hotels. as had been suggest
led blythe. senator from Montana,
AMENDMENTS BY DoLINER.
KY "A series OF amendments by Mr.. Dol
& liver OF women's and children's dress
Sgocds.ready made clothing, suspenders.
first levying the duty on
wool contents of the goods and the ~
aprovidlng a direct reduction of duties
Mere all avoted down.
Mr. Dollfveis also next offered an
amendment limiting to 100 per. cent the
duty oil any article. MI. A1drleh op-sA
posed both the leNYing OF duties ac-i
scordf1g 10 the wool IN the fabric and
also the Limitation of duty to 100 per &
cent. Is
"a A long discussion, in which Senator's 4
fAldrich; Clanp. Beveridge, SDilliNer and
Smoot took part. mad rs its subject the
!praclicability8of ascertainng the guam
$tity and quality OF wool in cloth for /
the purpose OF levyings a duty, and all
SO the practicahility as a protective
measure of 50 determining what the
duty should be. On the one hand,
members of the finance committee con-
tended that the proposition was i'm
practicable from all points of View,
while the other senator took the OPP
$posingsIiew. h
Il A merry discussion of causes for the
low prices of wool was INDUCED in by
Senators McIaurin and Hepburn.
IIlt7f w llSDIl ttlTllt Dill WIS IolttitlSu Ny
the Wyoming and Idaho senators, while
the senator from Mississippi presented 4
figures to relieve the Wilson bill of
that charge.
A BY a vote of 80 to 43, Mr.. Dolllver's
amendment for the limiting duties to-
100 per cent was voted down.
Another amendment by Mr.. Dolliver,S
limiting to 60 per cent the duty on wool
Gwasteand other hy-products Of wooden
goods IVA s. lost. rs n to 40 56i
AS the wool schedule was still before
4 the senate, Senator Eailey obtained 4
unanimous consent to bring up the in-S
come tax amendment tomorrow, instead
of today. which mad been previously
agreed upon. 81
Another amendment by Mr.. DolliyerS
based the duty on wool on the percer-
tage OF its shrinkage. He did not be-
5lieye this amendment would actually
lower the duty, but thought it would
n have the opposite effect. The amend
sment WAS rejected, 81 to 81.
VI