The Virginia enterprise., 1909-10-22
STATE OF 2lINNnsoCA. CouNrv M
st. Louis. In District Court. Elev.
enth Judicial Distr1ct.
SUMMONS.


st. Louis. In District Ceurt. Elev-
snth Judicial District.
Fred B. RossOm. William N. Spalding, Electa |
W. spaldiug. Jessie o. Spalding, Thomas |
DoWse. Emil Hartman. Bette Hartman.
Richard D. Mailett, Martha A. Mallett,
stephen Thomas. f. P. Alexander. Duluth |
banking Company. a corporation. Leo A. !
Ball. Melvin G. Newell. and all other per-
sons unknown claiming any right. title, es-
tate, interest or lien In or on the real es-
tate described In the complaint.
Defendants.
STATE OF MINNESOTA, to the above man,
ed defendants:
You are hereby summoned and re.
Quired to answer the complaint Of the
platntin in the above entitled action,
which II filed In the office Of the clerk |
Of the District Court, Of the County OF
st. Louis and State Of Minnesota, and
to serve . copy Of your ans wer to the
said complaint oa the subscriber q: his
onlce In the Burrows Building, in the |
City OF Duluth. st. Louis County. Min |
nesota. witain twenty days after the
service Of this summons upon you. ex-
elusive OF the day OF sucn service: and
II you fail to answer the said COM
plant within the time Aforesaid, the
plaintiff in this action will apply to
the court for the relief demanded in
the complaint.
Dated April 18th, 1909.
JOHN B. ARNOLD,
Plaintiffs Attorney.
ZIG Burrows Bldg, Duluth. Mimi.
NOTICE OF LIS PENDENs.
STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY OF
st. Louis. In District Court. Elev-
enth Judicial District.
Edward Finch,
Plaintiff.
Fred h. Rossom, William NJ. Spalding, Electa
W. spalding, Jessie o. Spalding. Thomas
Dowse, Emil Hartman. Rettie Hartman.
Richard D. Mallett, Martha A. Ma!lr,t
Stephen Thomas. E. P. Alexander, Duiulh
Banking Company. a corporation. Leo A.
Ball, Melvin 6. Newell. and all other per-
sons unknown claiming any right. title. es-
tate. interest or lien In or on the real es-
tate described in the complaint.
Defendants.
You will please take notice:
That an action Caas been commenced
in the District Court Of st. Louis
County. Minnesota. by the above named
plaintiff against tho above named de-
PENDANTS, the object of which Is as follows:
First. For partition Of the property
described in accordance with
the interest and proportion of the lands
owned by the plaintiff and defendants.
Second: For sale thereof, II it shall be
found to the best interest of the owners that
q sale be made
Third: That the adverse claims of each
and every of the defendants be tried and
the rights OF each and every Of the adverse
claimants and the rights on each and every
OF the parties respectively be determined.
Fourth: That each and every of the de-
PENDANTS be forever enjoined and barred
from making any claim against the interest
OF these plaintiffs in said property OF any
part thereof.
Fifth: For such other and further relief
as to the Court may seem just aud equitable
upou tue 1ICC ana aIIe8aClOn or the COM
plant.
The complaint In said action is now on file
In the Office of the Clerk Of the District Court
for St. Louis County. Minnesota. The
property In said complaint and herein refer
red to is situate in the County Of St. Louis
and State of Minnesota, and described as FOL-
lows tOwit:-The South one-half OF the North.
west one quarter and the North one half of
the Southwest One-Quarter Of Section Twenty
five; the East one helf of the Southeast one
quarter and the Southwest one. e.quarter OF
the Southeast one.quarter of Section Twenty
six; the West one-half of the Northeast one
quarter. and the Northwest one-quarter of
Section Thirty-fve, all in Township Sixty
North, Range Twelve West, Fourth Princi-
pie Meridian.
Dated May 3rd. 1909.
JOHN B. ARNOLD,
Plaintiffs Attorney
3l6-3l' Burrows Bldg,
Duluth. MINI.