Carson City daily appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1907-1930, 1909-12-06

Judge Langan held session o
the district court this morning
the principal matter before him bein!
the Nye Il Ormsby County bank CASE
Owing to the time that will be requil
before him as regards this case the
followin gorders were made regard.
ng other cases on the calendar:
In the application for new tria
In the case of Anderson VS.. Behrmar
the ease was set for tomorrow The
same order was made regarding the
case Of Springmeyer VS.. Dangberg in
which additional findings are asked
In the matter of the setting aside of
the verdict in the case of Peterson
VS.. Peterson and the motion for a
new trial of the case the court set
Wednesday morning at 10 o'clock as
the time for hearing the arguments
In the same.
against Receiver Hall OF the Nye &
Ormsby County bank the attorney
for the receiver. James Boyd. explain
ed to the court that sufficient time
was not given to prepare the report
In full and present it to the court
and that he had misunderstood the
order made as to the time the report
was to be presented in court. After
hearing the statement of Mr.. Boyd
the court ordered the clerk to make
an order purging tae receiver of con-
tempt In the matter.
The final report of the receiver of
the Nye & Ormsby bank was then
taken up and Attorney Chartz. repre-
senting depositors in the bank and
Frank Golden. addressed the court.
stating that he had not prepared his
objections to the report in writing,
but taat he would file a general OBJ
lection to the entire report and speci-
fic objections to the part of the re-
rort allowing fees to the attorneys
for the receiver and travelling en-
n"nses for these attorneys. At this
irnCturr Attorney Boyd for the re-
Coiver stated to the court that ten
davS had o'ansed since the final re-
port was filed with the clerk Of the
court and that he considered that
sufficient time had been given the
attorneys for making his objections
and filing the same in writing with
the clerk of the court. Mr.. ChartZ
answered that he had not sufficient
time. but would have the objections
in writing at 1880. This time was al
lowed by the court.
The court asked Mr. Chartz whom
he represented in this case. To this
&c. Charyz replied that ae ibpre- Z
sentcd dcpositors In the Nye &
Ormsby County bank. among whom
was his wife and others who had de-
posits In that institution. Beside
these he stated to the court that he
represented Frank Golden who was
the largest individual stakeholder in
the bank and those interests were
such that he became the party most
In the outcome of the legal II
attendant to the inter- If
csts Of the bank. Mr.. Chartz further L
said that II the Nye G. Ormsby County n
bank should pay dollar for dollar Mr.. Ie
Golden would be affected by this re- Ia
suit more than any other individual J
who had an interest in the institu- Ii
ion. c
Mr.. Boyd objected to these state n
ments under the claim that the mat. a
ter was not before the court at this
line. The court took a different view a
)f the matter. stating to Mr. Boyd q
hat the court was looking for in .
and the statement Of Mr.. It
-hartz was what he wanted. Il
Tae court then ordered that Mr.. 1t
1hartz be given until 1880 to prepare b
lis written objections. Il
Mr.. Salisbury. Of the firm OF Sails Il
,ury & Green. then read to the court il
preferred claim against the N. & O. r,
ank for $14,90964 owed to the first ltt
National Bank on money collected on in