The Montgomery advertiser., 1909-01-14

. --
 that which the ls~. forbids shsin to do Moreovsr.. injunction issued :. at the insfancs iof a mahufacturer. to pretent the execution Of An alleged fnvalfd{law aGaiust third spefnons. who but for the, feat Of fheE.law--which prevents thsms from rs-ssiling --wotid becpms purchaser thousf, :, they, had not contrected to do so--on the gropnd that t wis necessary to. pro. tect the eood will of the business. would carry the doctrine of the power of Aeoiiyt of equity to Interfere for the projection of such . righf to start- linG lengths, especially, wheh as here. the law complained Of is. not directed speciality a8ain1t compiainanes wares, but operates upon every one who seiis. the 1forbidden goods In the State. There, isa no such prfvity9 in right be. tween the manufacturer and such third person. aAs authorizes the hianu. factufer to complain. and the; injury legal cause of 2. action to the .srsianu. facturer. even thodgh the law be- in.
 z, { vandisy sf Prskssstss..
 |. Tf. however the court is mistaken tn the foregoins analysis iof compIsin- ants bill and tho general allegation thcreln--that,at at all times herein mon toned. in carving on It's business as aforesaid, compiainsntT has 4observed eofnpiied wtth such statutes of the State of Afabsma, and of the United states as were, appiicAbis'--should be taken to mean that complainant has compiled with E the constitution, and laws of this state by filing the. proper papers with the Secretary, of state and taking out the proper licenses for it's agents, then 1t becomes .necessary to consider the yalidity of the prohibi- tion law. If complainant and It's agents gre authorized to seIi its pro- duct Sin this State, and have complied with the State laws In that respect and the prohibition statute be unconstiu- tionai. then. the threats of the defend- ans. to execute 1t with the result stated in the bill. would present the case of Individuals under coiorfofS void law inhfctfnE. sifreparable injury upon q property right, and the person thus in- 5ursd would ordinarily,be entitled to a remedy In the court of equity. instead of being put to an action at law to vindtcate the right.
 The ofiice In general of q prelimi- nary Injunction is to maintain status quo exisftng at the time of the fllinx of the bill. where the ultimate right is Involved In doubt. with the probabii- ihes in Its. favor. and there is danger of irreperabie injury ifss the preiimi- nary linjunction.s be withheld and its omce sometirnes, is by means of it's op- sration in the future upon 4he exercise offe srightsto restore. the status quo to what 1t was before where, 1t has been illegally changed to the prejudice. of the complainant who has endeavoreds to main tain 1t. and has been illegally prevent ed from doing so without faultsor. ac- qntescencs on his part, prior to the fil- Ing of hisibilL 4s .e., 9te .a..
 'Ini issuing a preliminary injunction. thes4 court except in :. very, rare in. stancess mus always consider the ball. aace ofsresuitant Injury to the parties
 and ip many cases, to the: public, and where the right D asserted is one in the exefcIseso of which the public has a vital intsEeBf asIin sthe. execution of laws,' of. thisF Kind, .theg court may re- fuse 9spreiirnlnarysi injunction, when if
 hei matter concerned only the parties to the suit, tt would grant it The sit- nation atkfhs time the preliminary,vrlt is asked must freQ0entiy control the denial Tor granting of 1t. even though the right sought ito be protected be clear, and though ton final decree the court might be compelled to adjudRe the right In favor of the complainant. Mlhsiow ". B. 6 O.. R. R. Co.,, 1ss U S. ee1.- yg,asf ,z -z5 ,&
 2 "Attaeits for. grave cause have been ably made upon the validity of the prohibition statete, but whatever may be the convictions tof the court aa to the validity or inva1idity- of the stat ute. ana assto the Judgment which tn . court should pronounce thereon, 1t ! Is clear fu the conviction, for the. reasons g now. to- be Sgiyens that 1t ought not no W to render any judgmentsor express an opinion thereon. .-g- -. : " onestisne for, Ls9iaIafare. : . Y The good or III of prohibition law 10 question addressed solely to the Le6isihtufe It. Is gtiie sole judge of such Questions and It's deterfninafion Is nlndsng upon a1l courts. SThe enforce