Arizona republican., 1909-03-21

affirmed. This is the action brought by the Union Bank and Trust company against the appellant to recover the amount of the dedication of former Cashier Mcdowell, now a resident of Yuma.
 In the case of T. F. Parish and oth- CTS, appellants, against the Cienguita Copper company, the judgment was in favor of the appellants in that the opinion holds that the proceedings by which the property of the Arizona corporation was conveyed to the Ne vada corporation were null and void.
 In the matter of Lizzie B Murphy and others, appellants, against Joseph w. Brown and other. appellees, from Pima county. the judgment of the low CT court was affirmed. This was a proceeding for the collection of rent or the holding to responsibility the successors to q merchant who before the expiration of the term of his lease had disposed of his stock to others It is said that this transaction is re- sponsible for the law enacted by the late legislature regarding the sale of merchandise in bulk. and requiring that all such sales must be preceded by ten days advertisement.
 The case of Louis Zocsendorf against Albert Steinfeld and others from Pima county, was reversed This involved something more than $3OO0 900. growing out of the sale of the old Boot mine There were several other suits in which other parties were opposed to Steinfeld. all relating in some way to this mining deal The opinions in all cases. whatever might have been the result in the lower court, were favor able to Steinfeld.
 The cases of the territory against T. c. Morris. brought from Yavapai county. were dismissed They had to do with the alleged bribery of the board of supervisors at the time of the election of a district attorney. In one case a demurrer had been sus- tained to the indictment The case was brought up on the right of the territory to ask for review of the proceedings on matters of law.
 In the case of Albert Ryan. appel lant against the territory. respondent from Iavapai county, the judgment of the lower court was reversed. Ryan was a labor leader who had been or dered away from a mine near Jerome and when Superintendent Frank Burns approached him to compel him to leave, the superintendent carrying an iron bar in his hands, Ryan drew revolver. He was arrested for assault The appeal was based on the ground that the defendant was not allowed to .I, was convicted and sentenced to three years in the territorial prison. This is the case in which the defendant in weighed against the court. charging that it was under capitalistic in fluences.
 In the case of QuOng Yu. appellant, against the territory. respondent from this county the judgment of the lower court was affirmed. The appellant was a Chinese merchant involved in the burglary of the New York store His guilt was largely established by the testimony of the chief burglar. Arviso ! The sufficiency of the testimony of an accomplice was questioned in the . appeal.
 Other cases were decided as follows: !
 V c' -"uSSidNe'. dppeHdHt dsdinSl 1 the territory, respondent from Santa Cruz county, convicted of assault with intent to commit rape. affirmed.
 George High. appellant. against the territory, Graham county respondent. convicted of assault to rape. affirmed
 J. H. Ryan. appellant. against the erritory. respondent. Pima county, murder; affirmed.
 Pinkie Dean. appellant, against the