The Owosso times. (Owosso, Mich.) 1897-1926, 1909-11-05

| pclOIc uuc oepCcunDeT IcTH VI COui
was finished, comes the Novembe
term of court, which opens mex
Monday morning. The calendar hai
/ ten criminal cases, twelve law cases
and twenty-tbree chancery cases, o
which eleven are divorce cases
Eight of the ten criminal cases are
for violation of the liquor law, mos
of them continued over from the
| September term.
The cases listed on the calendar
are as follows
| Criminal Cases.
| The People VS.. Louis Sutherland
violation of the liquor law.
| The People VS.. Alva e. Vert, de-
sertion of family.
The People VS.. Nicholas Hauck
violation of the liquor law.
The People VS.. Carl Smith, viola
| ton of the liquor law.
The People VS.. Conrad Mehlen-
| bacher, violation of the liquor law.
The People VS.. oliver Lafave,
violation of the liquor law.
The People VS.. Ezra Taylor, burg
larry.
The People VS.. Thomas S. Crane,
violation of the liquor law.
The People VS.. Conrad Meblen-
bacher, violation of the liquor law.
The People VS.. Charles Preece,
violation of the liquor law.
Conrad Mehlenbacher has two
cases against him, which gives him
a chance to try two different at
torneys. A. L. Chandler will de-
fend him in one case, while S. O.
Pulver will defend him in the 9TH
err.
Law Cases.
Martin ID. Comstock VS.. Clark
Taggart, ct al, assumpsit.
In the matter of the estate Of
Hugh McCurdy, deceased in the mat
ter of the appeal from John T. Nc
Curdy, ct al.
Seth @. Pulver VS.. Robert Scott.
Emma Groesbeck, administrative
of the estate of Allen B. Groesbeck,
deceased. vs. The Grand Trunk Rail-
way Company.
use NOWicI Vs. Tic lIIdSc
Of Durand.
c. H. Barrett Company VS.. Hiram
N. Ainsworth.
Frances Ming VS.. the City of
Owosso.
Linn M. Cudworth and William
F. Hall, co-partners, ETC., VS.. tine
Union Telephone Company.
MT IT.
son VS.. Cephise Bannister, appeal.
In the matter of the appeal from
the probate court in the estate of
Sherman knight, deceased, F. B.
Frasier, claimant, appeal.
Titus S. Martin VS.. Christopher
Ellsworth and Amelia Ellsworth, re-
plevin.
First National Bank Of Durand
vs.. Fred H. Strawsine and Anna S.
Lahring.
Chancery Cases.
City of Owosso VS.. Shiawassee
Light e Power Company, bill for
injunction.
John Young, Joel Pardee, Will
liam Jewell, ct al. VS.. Clara Diamond
Dill FOR injunction.
Rebecca Wood VS.. Samuel Hackett
bill to cancel coal lease.
Jacob l.. Summers VS.. Alkaline G.
Fuller, bill for specific performance.
Albert J. Nixon, William s. Nix
on and Lille M. Leland VS.. Margaret
Nixon, bill for an accounting.
Emily Balm Us. Lewea Wardwell
and Cora Wardwell, foreclosure.
Joseph B. Harrington, ct al. VS..
Cornelia e. Stills, ct al, bill to re-
move cloud from title.
Melissa Brown VS.. Joseph Cauff-
man, ct al, bill to remove cloud
from title.
I.ottie NJ. Let's VS.. James J. Zim-
norman ct al, bill for injunction.
Divorce Cases.
Johnnie Relaford VS.. Luella Rela-
ford
Eliza Osmer VS. George Osmer.
Louis Greenman VS.. Nellie S.
Greenman.
Phebe A. Bearce VS.. Henry M.
Bearce.
Edward G. Hackett VS.. Lydia M.
Hackett
Emma F. Hersey VS.. Charles e.
Hersey
Evangeline Huckins vs.. Lawrence
Huckins
Iva NJ Stever vs.. Otto M. Stever.
Frank Brooks VS.. Mae Brooks.
Edward Hath VS.. Jennie Hath.
Mabel Chambers vs. George
Chambers.
Amelia A. Wilmott VS.. Russell G.. |
Wilmott.
Nellie thinner VS.. Edward Zim- |
mer.
Louis Austin VS.. Lillian NJ Aus
tin.
Clearly Understood.
They seldom gave dinner parties. |
and those they gave were small But |
they liked things done decently and In |