Norwich bulletin., 1909-05-28
NEW CASES BROUGHT
 IN SUPERIOR COURT,
Many pivorces and Several Damage Suits Returned for the Month of June-Pctition and Appeals.

There are many cases returned fror the first Tuesday in June before the supreme court to Clerk c. F. Parsons. among which there are many divorce suits with adultery as the chief ground on which the petitions are based. There are several damage suits, with one ap- peal from probate and petition for change of name. The cases are as follows:
 Edith Brown of Montville sues Grover c. Brown of parts unknown for Edith Phillips and they were married March 25. 1907. She seeks the divorce on the grounds of adultery, naming Jennie Johnson of Mvntville as the CO., respondent, also that he is habitually incorporate and intelorably cruel.
 Julia $. Bunnell. formerly Julia F.. Simon, of New London, seeks divorce from Herbert E. Bunnell of New Lon don on the grounds of adultery with Marian Sylvia and other persons un- known They were married Nov. 1s. 1904. She asks for the custody of two minor children, aged and 1 1-2 years.
 Myra Nichols Doherty of Waterford asks for divorce from Robert Doherty of New London on the grounds of adultery. alleged to have been com mitted with Ella Dyer at New. London anu OlICA DldCCS GlIlCC Qiy l. lJVcs
 James R. Sheldon of StoningtC sues for divorce from Matilda C.. Stanton Sheldon on the grounds of assertion. alleged to have continued from Dec. IA, 1904. They were married March IS. 1902.
 A divorce Is wanted by Edgar J. Standish of Colchester from Edith ". White Standish of parts unknown on the grounds of assertion, alleged to f k11 sy were married Nov. 9, 1e01
 Marianne Rego Vineiros of Stonirg- ton asks for a divorce from Rita Amelia Silva Vineiros of parts un- known on the grounds of desartion. They were married Jan. g, 1895. She deserted, it is claimed, on June 8, 1903.
 James Davidson of New London ap- peals from the decision of the probate court in not accepting his account as 4xecutor under the will of his mother. Ellen F. Davidson.
 Sarah Kingsley and Phoebe Kingsley of Lebanon sue the WIndhanl Maau- featuring company for $e00 damages and ask for an injunction from further use of fiashboards on the dam of the company in Lebanon, where on May 1. 1903. and for more than six years pre- vious the plaintiffs own meadow land north of Ten Mile river. The company secured the right to establish a fash board two feet high so as to overflow the meadow. but for ssve ral years have raised the dashboard seven inches higher than two feet, and for that ex- tra the damages are claimed
 Harry M. Lee sues the Mohican company in New London for an tnjunc- ton restraining the contractors of the company from rendering his rooms un- inhabitable and $2,000 damages.
 E'rederick w Marion Nf Montvf1ie administrator of the estate of A. E. Burdick. Slies the Connecticut com pany for the death of thelatter. on April IA, 1909, in Montville. It is claimed he was put off the car AI HempsteaHs and negligently left so another car struck him. Damages of $5,000 are asked.
 Sarah J. McJennett of Los Angeles sues Daniel J. Lucy of New London, agent of the Equitable Home Assur- ance company. for $1,050 to recover a judgment given in the superior court fin May. 1908, for $500 damages and costs. qa@t Ms
 A suit is brought by c!arissa B. Rathbun of Phenix, R. I against Hen " B. Sisson of Lyme, trustee of the estate of A. c. c. Rathbun, husband of the plaintiff, and asks for a decree re- quiring the defendant to sell such DOT ton of the principal of the estate as required for her support. she claiming she needs $15 week and has received but $150 year. She also claims s1,00O damages.
 Martin M. Richman of New London brings suit against P. H. O'Brien of New London for s2,50O, claiming that the defendant struck him on Jan. 15, 1909, with an earthen pitcher, perma- nently injuring the drum of his ear
 Jeremiah Twomey of New London sues Michael McEnany of New London for a foreclosure of a. mortgage of $s01 on land in New London given Dec. 6, 1907.
 The Willimantic and Stafford Street Railway company, which was duly or ganized here and where it Is located At meeting on April 30, 1909, the company voted that the name of the company be changed from Willimantic and Stafford Street Railway company to the Rockville Willimantic Lighting company, and that application he made to the superior court for a decree au- thorizing the same.