davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-10-22

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington for King county.
L. H Craver, Plaintiff, VS.. Des Moines
City Imp. Co, and all persons unknown,
if any, having or claiming an interest
in and to the hereinafter described real
property Defendants. No. 69617-Notice
and Summons.
State of Washington: To the above
defendants and each of them:
You and each of you, as owners, claim
ants or holders of an interest or estate
in and to the hereinafter described real
property are hereby Notified that the
above named plaintiff is the holder of
one certain delinquent tax certificate is
sued by the Treasurer of King County,
State of Washington, dated the 9Th day
of August, 1909, and numbered B6lOlO,
for the delinquent taxes of the year
upon real property situated in said King
County, described as follows, to-Wlt:
Fractional Lot 4, Block 80, Town of Des
Moines.
That the taxes for the following prior
and subsequent years have been paid
by the plaintiff upon said above de-
scribed real property. to-w1t: For the
year 1906, the sum of - cents; Tor me
year 1907, the sum of IS cents; for the
year 1908, the sum of Sill, which sew
eral sums bear interest at the rate OF
Is per cent. per annum from said GATE
of payment, and are all the unpaid and
unredeemed taxes upon and against SAID
real property.
further notified and summoned to be
and appear within sixty days after the
date of first publication of this notice,
exclusive of the day of said first pub e4br
lication, to-wit: within so days after
October l, 1909, in the, above entitled
court and action; and defend this action
and answer the complaint of said plain
tiff and serve a copy of your answer on
the undersigned attorney for plaintiff
at this office below stated, or pay the
amount due, together with interest and
costs. In case you fail so to do, Judg-
ment will be rendered herein, foreclosing
the lien of said taxes and costs against
each parcel of said real property for
the sums and amounts due upon and
charged against EACH for said taxes, in
terest and costs, ordering a sale of each
parcel of said property for the satisfac,,
ton of the sums charged and found
against it respectively as provided by
law, and as prayed in plaintiffs COM
plant now on file in this cause and
court.
L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff.
A. c. MACDONALD,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
Office Address: 524 Bailey Building,
Seattle, Wash.
Oct. 1st-Nov. 18th, 1909
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-10-22

ing filed in this court her petition set
ting forth that said estate is now in
condition to be closed and is ready for
distribution of the residue thereof
among the persons entitled by law
thereto and it appearing to the court
that said petition sets forth facts suf-
fcient to authorize distribution of the
IDA M. WEBSTER
AS Administrative of said Estate
HOMER E. TURNER.
Attorney for Estate. No. 745 New
York Block, Seattle, Wash.
October October 20, 1909.
residue of said estate:
1t is therefore ordered by the court
that all persons interested in the estate
of the said Fredarica Peter, deceased,
be and appear before the said Superior
Court of King County, State of WASH
bate Department of said court in the
City of Seattle, on the 4th day of No
vember, 1909, at the hour of $3.50 o'clock
a; m. OF SAID day, then then b and there TO
order of distribution should not be ma9l
of the residue of said estate among t3f
heirs and persons in said petition mes
toned according to law. -
1t is further ordered that a copy of
this order be published once week for
four successive weeks before the said
attic Republican, a newspaper printed
and published in said King County and
of general circulation therein.
Done in open court this zIth DAY Oh
September. 1909
ROBERT H LINDSAY,
Court Commissioner.
State Of Washington County of King SIS.
1, D. K. Sickels, County Clerk Of King
County and ex-officio Clerk of the Su-
perior Court of the State of Washington,
for the County of King, do hereby certi,
fly that the foregoing is a full, true and
correct copy of an original order to
show cause, made by said Court on the
9th day of September, 1903, in the
matter OF the estate of Fredarica Peter.
deceased.
Witness my hand and the seal of said
Court this 9th day of September, 1903.
D. K. SICKELS, Clerk
By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk.
October October 20, 1903.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-10-22

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington for King County.
In the Matter of the Estate of Anna
L. Eckhart Deceased. No. 10614. No
tice to Creditors.
BY order of said court made herein on
the 18th day of September, 1909, notice
is hereby given to the creditors of, and
to all persons having claims against said
deceased or against said estate, to pre-
sent them with the necessary vouchers
to the undersigned administrator of said
estate, at S12 Lowman Building, Seattle,
Washington, the place of business of said
estate, in Seattle. in said county and
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-10-22

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington. for King County
In the Matter of the Estate of Mary
Mountjoy, Deceased. No. 10627. Notice
to Creditors.
Notice is hereby given to the creditors
of and all persons having claims against
the said deceased, Mary Mountjoy, or her
estate, to present the same, with the
necessary vouchers to the undersigned
administrator at the office of Edward
Won Tobel, 604 Mutual Life Building,
Seattle, Washington, the same being the
place for the transaction of business of
said estate, within one year from date
of the first publication of this, notice
to-wit: within one year from the 24th
day of September, 1909.
Dated this oath day of September, 1909
WILLIAM l.. MOUNTJOY,
Administrator of the Estate of Mary
Mountjoy, Deceased.
Sept 24-Oct %, 1909
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-10-22
SUMMONS AND SERVICE OF PUBLIC
CATION.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, in and for the
A. ]. Speckert. Plaintiff, VS.. August
Lul1ui, Defendant.-No. 69187.
The State of Washington to the said
August Lukui. defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty (60) days after the date of
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-10-22

state, within one year from and after
the date of first publication of this notice
or same will be barred
Date of first publication September "a
1909.
GEO. J. DAM,
AS Administrator of said Estate.
Z. A. RIDDLE.
Attorney for Estate
Suite 655, Colman Building, Seattle,
sept Sept 24Aoct. %, 1909.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-10-22
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DIS
TRIBUTION SHOULD NOT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington. for the County
of King-In Probate.
In the Matter of the Estate of Freda-
RIGA Peter Deceased.-No 10563.
Marie Peter, Administrative of the es-
tate of Fredarica Peter, deceased, hav-
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-10-22

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington for King County.
Florence e. Metcalf, Plaintiff, VS..
Charles F. Metcalf, Defendant. No. ---
Summons for Publication.
The State of Washington to the SAID
Charles F. Metcalf, Defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty (60) days from. and after
the date of the first publication of this
summons, to-wit; within sixty GOD days
after the 18th day of October, 1909, and
defend the above entitled action in the
above entitled court and answer the
complaint of the plaintiff and serve a
COPY of your answer upon the UNDER
signed attorneys for plaintiff at their
office and post office address below deslg-
mated, and in case of your failure SO to
do Judgment will be rendered against
you according to the demand of the
plaintiffs complaint, which has been filed
in the office of the clerk of said court.
The object of said action is to obtain
a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds
of matrimony now existing between
plaintiff and defendant, on the ground OF
non-support, failure to provide and cruel
treatment. - ~
NORRIS SOUTHARD & SIMPLIFY,
Attorneys for Plaintiff.
Office and Post Office Address: So
Haller Building, Seattle King County,
Date of first publication, October Is,
1909. Last, November 26, 1909.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-10-22

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King County
B. Edward Rees, Plaintiff, Us. Elva
Rees, Defendant. No 69461. Summons
for Publication.
The State of Washington to the said
Elva Rees. Defendant
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication of this s4mm tpn at to-
day of Sept, 1903, and defend the above
entitled action in the oo ab9ye entitled Mt LED
plaintiff, and serve a copy of your ans
wer upon the Undersigned : attorney tor for or
case of your failure so to do, judgment
will be rendered against you o, according ag
has been filed with the clerk of said
court. The object of the above entitled
mony between the plaintiff and defend
ant on the ground of abandonment.
FRED c. BROWN,
Plaintiffs Attorney.
P. o. Address: 21O New York Build
ing, Seattle King County, Washington.
Sept 24-NOV. 5, 1903
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-10-22

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, in and for the
County of King. Johannah Docken-
dorff, Plaintiff VS.. C. E. Dockendorff,
Defendant No. 69766-Summons for
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-10-22

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, OF THE
State of Washington, for the County
of King Marie r. O'Brien, Plaintiff,
VS.. James O'Brien, Defendant. No
Summons by Publication.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-10-22

z. B. RAWSON,
Attorney for Plaintiff
Postoffice address, GIT Pacific Block.
Seattle. County of King, Washington
october 8. November 10, 1909.
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-10-22

County of King. Jonannah Docken-
dorff Plaintiff VS.. c. E. DockendorH
Defendant. No. 69766-Summons for
Publication.
The State of Washington, to c. b.
Dockendorff, the above named defend
ant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after. the date of the
first publication of this summons, to-
wit, within sixty days after the Sth
day of October, 1908, and defend the
above entitled action in the above en-
titled court, and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff and serve a copy OF
your answer upon the undersigned at
torney for plaintiff, at his office below
stated and in case of your failure SO
to do judgment will be rendered against
you according to the demands of the
complaint, which has been filed with
the clerk of said court.
The object of this action is to obtain
a decree of divorce on behalf of the
plaintiff dissolving the bonds of matr1-
mony between plaintiff and defendant
on the ground of cruel and 1nhuman
treatment and for alimony, suit money
and attorneys fees, and the possess
sion of personal property belonging to
the plaintiff.
Attorney for Plaintiff.
Post Office and Office Address, Suite
655 Colman Building, Seattle, WASH
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-10-22

VS.. James y Brlen, Delenudnl' NO'
Summons by Publication
The State of Washington, to the said
James, O. Brien. Defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication of this summons, to-
wit, within sixty days after the Sth
day of October, A. D. 1909 and defend
the above entitled action in the above
entitled Court. and answer the COM
plant of the plaintiff, and serve a copy
of your answer upon the undersigned
attorney for plaintiff at his office below
stated: and in case of your failure SO to
do, judgment will be rendered against
you according to the demand of the
complaint, which has been filed with
the Clerk of said Court. The object
of the said action and the relief sought
to be obtained therein is fully set forth
in said complaint. and is briefly stated
as follows; An action for divorce on
the grounds of non-support and aban-
donment of the plaintiff for more than
one year. --.-
The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1909-10-22

Attorney for Plaintiff.
Post Office and Office Address: Suite
655 Colman Building, Seattle, Wash
ington. October s. November ~. 1919
The Hattiesburg news. (Hattiesburg, Miss.) 1908-1917, 1909-07-15
OPPOSITION INDICATED
THROUGHOUT COUNTRY
Corporation Managers Do Not object
as They Prefer Federal Supervision
to That Of the ssate-Hoi dino Com.
panies to Be Exempted.

WASHINGTON, July 15.-The cor
poration tax may be dropped by the
tariff bill conference committee. From
source, apparen tly authentic. comes
the information that not one member
of the committee is heartily support.
ing the tax. If President Taft would
consent the administration amend.
ment would go out instanter. The
committee within the last twenty-four
tours has received many letters and
kilograms advising that the tax be
abandoned. Some of the conferees
abandoned. Some of the conferees are
even at the risk of offending the
President. The latest information
from the conference is that if the
tax is not abandoned the amendment
win be greatly modified AS was an
nouneed exclusively in these dispatch
Nes several days ago. the tax
will be reduced to one per cent. The
committee is firm in it's determination
to exempt holding companies from
the tax, and some of the other amend
ments tackled on after the bill reached
the senate proper will be stricken
out The situation is shaping up in
a way which points to the possibility
of the tax attracting more attention
from now on than tn tariff rates
The country has apparently settled
down to the belief that the. rates as
finally agreed upon will be about |
what the ultra protectionists want. |
Evidently this same public believes
there is an opportunity to kill the
corporation tax. This conclusion is |
based on the character of the commu-
nications which are coming to men, !
bers of the conference committee and
to senator's and representatives who !
are not members of that committee
from all parts of the country.
If one may judge public sentiment
by these representations, the country
prefers the income tax to the corpor-
alton tax. Grave doubt as to whether
the requisite number of states will
ratify the insome tax amendment is
being expressed. If the amendment
should fail of ratification. the cor
poration tax would become a fixture
The more the thoughtful representa-.
tives of the dominant party study the
question the less they are disposed
70 support the corporation tax. They
are expressing in private the fear
hat it will impose a burden that will
,rove embarrassing to the party in
The Hattiesburg news. (Hattiesburg, Miss.) 1908-1917, 1909-07-15
MAY HAVE To
RECALL beloved =
THEODORE"
CALIFORNIA BISHOP SAYS If
TAFT MAKES A FAILURE,
ROOSEVELT MUST
RETURN.

YOSEMITE, Cal, July 15.-In an adj
dress before the Yosemite Valley
Chautaqua, Bishop VIM. M. Bell, of
Los Angeles, said:
IF President Taft fails to make
good on the tariff and disappoints
the people after making them prom
ises, it may be necessary to recall to
the White House our dearly beloved
THEODORE"
The bishop added that the times de-
manded strong, fearless man for
President, and clean and fearless
press He scored the clergy for in
difference to politics. He closed with
this remark:
Wealth is conferred in a few indi-
viduals, and the time is coming for
division of this wealth, even if
revolution is necessary"
The Hattiesburg news. (Hattiesburg, Miss.) 1908-1917, 1909-07-15
SOUTH ATLANTIC LEAGUE.

Knoxville 4; Savannah 8.
Chattanooga l. Columbus 2.
Columbia 10; Augusta 1.
Jacksonville 3: Macon Slight
innings; darkness.
The Hattiesburg news. (Hattiesburg, Miss.) 1908-1917, 1909-07-15
VENEERED WOOD LATEST
FLIGHT OF FADDISTS
1891 900 Worth of Imported Arti-
Gle Used During the Past
Year.

WASHINGTON, July 15.-Veneered
wood is becoming more generally used
in the United States, according to a
preliminary report just made public
by the census bureau on the veneer
stock manufacturing Industry. This
report shows that during the year
1908 there was used in this industry
3S2, 542,000 feet log scale, valued at
1891 900, as compared with 34S,-
$4,000 feet, with a value of $6,436, 900,
during the year 1907.
The decrease in the cost of produc-
ton from domestic woods was shown
and an increase in the cost where
imported woods were used. AT
though practically every species OF
wood was used as material in veneer
gum was greater during the past year
han ever before. There was also
In increase in the demand for yellow
zine. The report shows that the prin-
ipal woods imported for the indus
ry were mahogany and Spanish &C.
ar.
The Hattiesburg news. (Hattiesburg, Miss.) 1908-1917, 1909-07-15

II you read the Daily News vou
get the news up to date.
The Hattiesburg news. (Hattiesburg, Miss.) 1908-1917, 1909-07-15
AMERICAN LEAGUE.

Chicago 8; New York first game
Chicago s; New York 2-Second
game.
Cleveland 4; Philadelphia g
Twelve innings.
Washington-Wet grounds.
The Hattiesburg news. (Hattiesburg, Miss.) 1908-1917, 1909-07-15
PEAS TAKING coTToN's PLACE.

LITTLE ROCK, Ark, July 15.-Ac-
cording to reports received here, the
farmers of southwest Arkansas are
plOughing under their fields of cotton
in an attempt to eradicateA the boil
weevil, which it is declared is max
ing rapid inroads in that section.
In Union and Lafayette counties
the cotton crop will supplanted by
peas 1t is estimated that between
$1,000 and 1900 acres of cotton have
been destroyed in this state, although
he hot weather of the past several
weeks is aiding iD''the fight against
he pest.
The Hattiesburg news. (Hattiesburg, Miss.) 1908-1917, 1909-07-15

tax, one way to kill it would be to
give the House an opportunity to take
separate vdte on that amendment. |
Indee& senators assert that if the
conference committee refuses to i'm
pose the tax on holding companies,
the senate may reject the whole
thing when it comes back from con-
ference.
The people of New England are up
in arms against the tax. The Repub
lican members of the New York dele
cation are considering the wisdom of
organizing a movement to defeat 1t.
Many of the central West Republi
can members fear it will be their undo
ing at the next election, if it is ac-
cepted. The progressive Republicans
of the La Toilette ummins-Bristow
type of the northwest and the Mis-
souri, river country are all opposed
to 1t. 1t will thus be seen that it is
not a question between the so-called
conservative and progressive wings
of the party. The real issue involved
is entralization-the lodging of adj
ditional great powers here at the cap
itol. The country, apparently, is just
beginning to realize the importance
Of the step.
Representative Greene of Massachu.
sets re-enforces opposition to the cor
poration tax with two more documents
today, following the protest of the
Fall River Cotton Manufacturers AS.
sociation. One is from the Fall River
Manufacturers Mutual Insurance
company and the other from the great
machinery concern of Kilbourn, Lin
coin C Co., of which Leontine Lincoln,
president of the stae board II chart
ties, is president
The former reveals a curious situa,
ton, which illustrates strikingly the
tax. For years the Fall River Cotton
mills through a mutual company of
their own, have insured themselves.
With the great care exercised and the
improvements in fire service, fires
have grown very rare, until now the
mills are able to return to their own
treasures 95 per cent. of the amounts
paid in premiums which are levied
on a flat rate. The premiums amount
to about 100000 a year, Of which
$4,000 is returned to the mills. This
large sum, under a technical construc-
ton, represents the net earnings of
the mutual company, although not
dollar of it is profit, the money SIM
ply going from one pocket of the mill
into another.
"a curious phase of the situation"
said Mr.. Greene today, sis the an
tagonism of the operatives to the tax.
They have learned by long experience
that the only flexible item of cost
in manufacturing is labor, and you
can't convince them that if the tax
is imposed it won't in somd way be
taken out of their pay envelopes"
Mr.. Greene, like many of the Mas
sachusetts delegation, will vote
against the corporation tax if separ-
ate vote upon it is permitted in the
House.
The Hattiesburg news. (Hattiesburg, Miss.) 1908-1917, 1909-07-15
Congress MAY KILL
THE CORPORATION TAX

power, and at the same time intro
duce a Capitalization idea which, to
say the least, ought to be very care
| fully considered before it is accepted
and it is an interesting fact, not to
say significant one. that the great
corporations have lodged no objections
against the proposed corporation tax
and the regulation of their business
which the amendment provides. Their
silence is taken here at the capitol
to mean that they are willing, If not
anxious, that the tax should be i'm
posed. If the tax should be reduced
to one per cent. the financial drain
would not be felt by them, and they
would, it is pointed out, /. get what
they have been hoDing for lately, su
perv sion and regulations from Wash
ington instead of state supervision and
regulation. Public men have under.
stood for some time that the great
iHlSlSSlS WOulu prefer W uedl Will
centralized power at Washington rath-
err than with legislatures and state Of
ficials of forty-six states.
One senator in accounting for the
lence of the trusts and other great
combinations of capital on the cor
poration tax said today that these
concerns had within the last few
years lost control of the legislatures
of many states and were longing for
the day when they could escape state
regulation. This question as to the
advisability of centraliz ng So much
power in Washington at the expense
of the states together with the allege1
Inequalities of the corporation tax
is causing even Republicans who
are sitting in the conference to de-
vote serious thought to the subject
and within the last few days some of
the members of con gress have taken
pains to ascertain whether the pro
posed tax meets with public favor any
where. Their Inquiries, they say, lead
them to believe that the tax is UNI
popular in every state in the union.
While as has been noted, the great
corporations are silent, the general
run of business concerns are opposed
to II, believing that under a system |
of publicity centralized here at the |
capitol competitors of great financial |
will be able to learn at all !
times what the smaller and less for
tunate concerns are doing. Oppon-
ents of the tax have raised the point !
too that such Capitalization as is
regardless of whether cor.
porations do an interstate business
Or not, might give the federal govern
ment tremendous political opportuni-
les.
If the opposition to the tax confirm
les to develop, the House might re-
use to adopt conference report APP
proving the senate amendment I'm
luestionably the votes to reject the
are there If the men who
control them could be encouraged to
vote their real sentiments. There
we're not ten senators who were at
leart for the tax, and prossibly not
vice that many members of the
House who really believe that the pro-
'osed step ought to be taken without
he fullest discussion. The sugges-
ion has been made that If the Con-
erence committee, against its bet
er Judgment, but because the admin
stration wants it, does accept the