The Washington herald., 1909-10-23
DAILY COURT RECORD
Friday, Octobe ~,
FRIDAY, October %, 1909.

( 70 plaintiff to plead granted Attorneys. Ralston &
| Siddons-A- J.. Sinclair.
No. 8sSz johnson Co. Savings Bank vs.. But
Ter ct al certified TO Circuit Court No. . At,or-
( ncys, T. L. Jefords-W II. White.
No. 5oE Johnson Co Savings Bank vs. Hill:
! same Attorneys. same.
/ same
Ne. B2e2 Oliver vs.. Philadelphia. Baltimore. and
/ Washington Railroad Company; motion 70 restore
/ 70 calendar granted. AttoTneys A. S. W0rthugton
/ NJ kenuey Flannery.
/ No. 5Is23. Esher Henley Stone Company; mo-
\ ton to quash attachment granted: appeal noted.
/ Attorneys. i. FoTeSt-Gittngs & Chamberlin and
/ X. ". Hills
! No. 5sS5. birmingham vs. Capital Traction Com
pany; mCuon 20 advance case Tor trial granted At
! ,orne9s W. J. Lambert and r. X. Yeatman-R. X.
/ Perry * Son and g. T. Dunlop.
! No. 5000. Brandenburg vs. Scott: motion 20 dis
/ miss cause OFcrrulcd. Attorneys Brandenburg 4
| Brandenburg-Iyau Heidcman.
No. N5SS Cotton IS. Palmer. motion FOR new
trial OSe-ruled and judgment On verdict Attorneys
] Albert Sillcr-A. L. NeWmeyer
! NO. 5o@ Mcknight Capital Traction Com
/ pany; motion fer new trial orerruled and judgment
/ On verdict; appeal noted. Attorneys. r. T. Down
/ ing and G. A. Beny-R. K. Perry Son and G.
No. 5000 Jones vs.. Capital Traction Company,
leave granted plaintiff % amend declaration Attor-
Geys MILAN Smith, K. Perry & Son and 6.
/ T. Dunlop.
] -
No. DISCO. Hilton vs. Humphrey. motion 20 dis
miss for want q replication oVerrlled: motion for
judgment oIerrlled; leave granted plaintiff 20 file
replication. Attorneys, +. W. Naturalization
EidOut.
Assignments for to-day.
! No. r. Anderson administrator. vs. smith Piai--
I tins attorneys. Mather & Hopewel: defendants
attorneys. Maddox Galley.
Nc. IS. Jones vs. Capital Traction Corar7uv 81
/ torneys, MILAN < Smith-Peuy d Son and Duul0D
No. g. Jones vs. Capital Traction Company. a.
| toneys. same
No Il. Hamilton vs.. Brghtwood Railway Con-
Dany. Attorneys. Downing & Bcuy-DarIngtoa
No g. Lohr e. al. vs. Title Guaranty and surety
Company. Attorney Balderston- Gittuss & Cham
berlin.
No 93. GoTnan rs. F1Our Attorneys, France &
Heidemar-Darliugton & Wrgh'snan
No o. Falc0Eer 20 al. vs. Mcdonald Attornev-
PcrTy-Hamilt5n, Colbert. Yerkes & Hamilton.
No llA Nauman City and suburban Railway
Company. Attorneys, Wolf Rosenberg-Darlinz-
ton
No g. TySsovsh ct a. vs. r. Il. smith Co. A.
/ torneys. Nath. and G. r. Wls0n-Ralston & sid
d0us and W0FthngtCn-
No H. Squifes vs.. Lindns executor. Attorneys
Barnard JoAnson-Lindns & Linkins
Circuit Court No. ,.
CHEF JUSTICE CLABAUGH.
No. SIG. United States. 20 use Of Warren Ehret
/ Company IS George A. Fuller Company: clerk
ordered 10 refund deposit as security Tor costs At
torneys Tucker q kcEyon-E. s. Duy-u IT.
No. 15so W. b. Moses d sons VS.. Davis. mo-
ton for judgment continued. &c. Attorneys. X. G.
Donaldsou-F. T. Prau
No. 5l153 Donaldson vs. McNamaa e. al: de-
murrer oyeUuled. Attorneys Cole Donaldson
and A. A. Birney-sacohy q sheehy and Hufty &
Hufty.
No. $3.50 Willard vs. Employees Mutual Benefit
Association; motion 10 dismiss oTerrllcd SC At
toTneys .. /. Gaskins-fred. BeaH and William
Henry.
No. 5lsi5 Reside vs.. CoclreI: demurrer 10
declaration oycrTuled. &c. Attoueys Barnard 4
JoAuson-F. Beall and William Henry.
Assignments for to-day.
No. 1914 Dcre vs. Capital Traction Company
ATTORNEYS. BalderstOu-PerTy d Sons and Dunlop
No. 46. Griffith Il u1 vs. Metropolitan Life In
slrance Company. Attorneys. Wilson. IT.. and Pratt
Berry & Minor and Rowland.
No. 5l6T5 Mackenzie vs.. Grouse. Att0rueys
Mather-Davis
No. B. Brown vs. Philadelphia Baltimore and
Washington Railway Company. Attorneys Baker
sher1u 4 MilCr-1Ickenney & Flanncry.
No. e. Wadruu vs.. Dieudonne. Attorueys joan
so1-Ridout.