Evening times-Republican. [volume] (Marshalltown, Iowa) 1890-1923, 1909-07-10
whom he had waHtonly deserted and
FORGOTTEN years before. In his authen-

trlCtS III ldTSe pennsylvania CITY.
Three detectives took him into room
in the police station and questioned
him for about seven hours. Not get
ting the information desired, they sud
denly seized the bookkeeper, who was
Of slight physical strength, handcuffed
him and dragged him roughly down
two flights Of stairs, where he was
photographed for the rogues' gallery
("mugged'y. AS roughly was he drag
ged upstairs again. After an hours
further questioning one Of the detec-
tives grabbed the accused by his coat
collar and jerked him upon his feet.
care you going to open up or amt
your snarled the officer.
''Tve told you fifty times I don't
know anything" was the weary reply.
'Take that thenv' snapped the detec-
tRe. iunging forward and striking the
accused violently In the pit Of the
stomach. The little bookkeeper drop
ped to the floor, gasping for breath, his
face distorted in pain. The detective
jerked him to his feet and sat him vio-
1ently in chair. The prisoner faint
ed. About fifteen minutes later, after
the bookkeeper came to. he made q
confession Of guilt which on the trial
was shown conclusively to be false.
In Charles Klein's new play, "The
Third Degree" at the Hudson theater,
New York, the story shows how the
repeated questionings and suggestions
Of the police captain, Clinton, impress
on the mind Of the bewildered. half
drunk prisoner, Howard Jeffries, Jr.,
the idea that, after all, he really did
murder his friend Robert Underwood.
Later Captain Clinton is shown by DIR.
Bernstein to have hypnotic powers.
The playwright has not overdrawn
the possibilities of the situation. Ply
sicians, learned. cold blooded judges In
high courts, admit the ability Of strong
minds to overcome weaker mentality
and produce certain desired results
through persevering persecution, as in
the third degree process.
OF course the law does not approve
Of the methods used in some of the
cases before mentioned. Their use,
however, is usually safe because the
prisoner has no witnesses present
when he is examined. If he complains
of his treatment 1t will be case Of
his word against that Of three or four
or five detectives. as the case may be.
He probably has not had as yet an OPP
portunity to engage lawyer, or If he
has the lawyer will probably not be
oil <n olo Io
sweating" period is over. The police
of many cities frequently follow this
practice, which is clear violation Of
the constitutional provision that 'the
accused shall have the assistance
Of counsel" And the courts hold (see
People ex. rel. versus Risely, volume
13; Abbott's New Cases. page 1866 that
a person in Jail has the right to the
protection Of counsel even before in
dictment. Further, the extreme Of the
third degree is violation Of the con-
stitutional regulation that mo person
shall be compelled in any GRIM
inal case to be witness against him.
SELF"
Confessions obtained through prom
ises Of immunity from persons in au-
thority are not valid in the law, but
frequently admissions Of guilt are OBJ
tanned through promises Of immunity
made by private persons known by the
prisoner to have influence with the
prosecuting authorities. merely a mode
of evading the law. Harry Orchard Sc
cured immunity because of his confess
sion. it is generally believed
Confessions secured through duress
OF force are invalid, provided the ac-
cused can demonstrate to the satisfac-
ton Of the court that improper means
were used. The burden of proof (un-
fortunately for innocent victims of the
third degree) to show that an induce
ment has been held out or improper
influence used to exact confession is
on the prisoner. $50 held in English
and American casey Thus the law
makes it difficult to retract or invali-
date q confession. But facts which ex-
plain or qualify a confession may be
adduced in evidence.
All confessions to be admitted in evi-
dence must be voluntary. The admissi-
bility of confessions is to be deter
mined by the judge, their weight by
the jury. $50 decided in Missouri, Mas
sachusetts, Ohio, New York, Indiana,
Maryland, etc.
Facts, discovered in consequence of
confessions improperly obtained and
SO much Of such confessions as dis
tinctly relate to such facts may be
proved.-Stephen's Digest Of the Law
Of Evidence"
Deliberate confessions of guilt are
among the most effectual proofs Of the
law. Confessions may be inferred
from the conduct Of the prisoner and
from his silent acquiescence in the
statements of others and made in his
presence.-"Greenleaf on Evidence"
a prisoner can he deliberately made
drunk by those in charge of him and
thus easily led to confess to crime
This has been done by experts in third
degree thetics.e- The courts Of practi-
cnlly all the states hold that the con-
fession Of a. drunken man Is admlssi.
BILE in evidence.
The violence used in some Of the
cases noted in this article will proba.
bly, recur time and time again SO long
as human nature is human nature and
SO long as courts hold that, no matter
how improper the means used to Sc
cure confession. the facts thus learn.
ed may be put in evidence.