The Democrat-sentinel. [volume] (Logan, Ohio) 1906-1935, 1909-09-30

yards cross section cloth, IL %
The Stakalta Pen company,
two dozen pencils ..... | 40
Williams and Taylor. ia
square feet blue print 80. 2.2S
The Democrat Sentinel, 800
letter heads ........., 1,T5
A. II. Eiuls, printing damage
cards ......... ......... 100
MISCELLANEOUS
COLLECTOR OF DELINQUENT
PERSONAL TAXES.
j. c. Petit, 90 per cent. on
coilections ....'. .'......S 200. 90
ATTORNEY FEES IN CIVIL
CASES.
II. M. Whitcraft, commission.
ers VS.. l.. C. Wright ....$ 80. 90
o. w. H. Wright, commission.
ers VS.. IT, c. Wright. ..... 30. 90
Whtcraft and Wright, COM
missioners l.. C. Wright
circuit ......... .....,... so. 90
c. V. Wright, relation A. r.
McBroom, Campbell ...... 1900
S. II. Bright, filing Azbell
case supreme court .... : 80
Azbell case, supreme court 9S. 90
ATTORNEY FEES DEFENDING
PRISONERS.
John c. Petit, state VS..
Frank Johnson .........S %. 90
John c. Petit, state VS.. Pol
ley StultZ ............... 20. %
John c. Petit, state VS. Ern-
est Matheny ............. 30. 90
o. w. Fl. Wright, state VS..
Emmltt Matheny ....... 20. 90
o. w. III. Wright, state VS..
Policy Stultz ............. 20. 90
O. w. Fl. Wright, state VS..
Steven Bowen ........... %. 90
III. NJ. Whitcraft, state VS..
Frank Johnson ........... %. 90
{. V. Wright, state VS.. Cleve-
land Brokaw ........... $500
c. V. Wright, state VS.. Boyd 80. 90
c. V. Wright, state VS.. A.
Buck .......... .......... 2O.OO
c. V. Wright, state VS.. Shriner 175 90
Il. d. Ricketts,, state VS..
Frank McManaway ..... %. 90
T.. ID. Ricketts,, state VS..
Shflner ........ ......... 1000
A. r. McBroom, state VS.. John
CaNanee ........ .,...... TO 90
A. r. McRroom. state VS.. A.
Mullentree ....... ...,,.. 40 90
Seth Welty, state VS.. Orland
follnS ........ ....,..... 80 .Oo
ATTORNEY FEES ASSISTING
PROSECUTING ATTORNEY.
A. r. McBroom, assisting
state VS. p. Stultz ...... 500
A, r. McBroom, assisting
state VS.. Emmitt Mahaffey. 15. 90
A. r. McBroom, assisting
state vs. Cicalo ....... 200 90
A, r. McBroom, assisting
state VS.. S. Bowen. .... 10 90
S. II. Bright, assisting state
VS.. Cicalo, ............. %. 90
5. III. Bright assisting state
VS.. Cicalo, second trial. -. 200 90
O. w. II. Wright, assisting
state VS.. Boyd ..,....... 200 90
O. w. Fl. Wright. assisting
state VS.. Shriner ......... 225 90
John c. Petit, assisting state
VS.. Cleveland Brokaw .. 50 60
John C. Petit, assisting state
VS.. A Buck .......,...... 30. go
Seth Welty, assisting state
vs.. f. Johnson .......... 30. 90 |
Seth Welty, assisting state VS..
Emmitt MaHaffey ........ 40. .OOl
INSURANCE.
w w. McCrav & Son, prem.
ium on policies .........,$ 45.00I
l.appen & Leach, premium on
policies .....,., ......... 30. .OOl
EXPERT TESTIMONY.
VIM, G, Pengelly, state VS..
Boyd ......... ...,.,,,..$ rs. SO
IL Cfnfn
Boyd ,...,,.,. ..,...... % sol
Mr.. Cherubino, interpreter in
Cicalo case ..........,,... 80 90
REFUNDER OF TAXES.
W. n. Lay ......,...,...,.,S 1907
ID. Nj. Shurtz ............ 80
COURT COST IN CIVIL CASES.
d, NJ. Soiday, clerk of court,
Sundaycreek company VS..
treasurer and auditor ...$ S.44l
George b. Williamson, Sun
daycreek company VS.. treas
urer and auditor ......., 1.G2|
ID. Nj. Soliday, clerk of court,
Lucious Wright VS., com
missioners ....,. ........ 2,65
George b. Williamson, Lucius
Wright vs. commissioners. 2,aS
George Eisz, witness, Lucius
Wright VS.. commissioners. 2.20
Henry Trimmer, Lucius
Wright VS.. commissioners. . 100
c. Jourgenmeirer, Lucius
Wright VS.. commissioners. 90
James Bebout, Lucius Wright
VS. commissioners ....... 200
]. l.. Martin, Lucius Wright
VS.. commissioners ....... 200
A. n. Riff, Lucius Wright VS..
commissioners .......... 200 |
Charles Wright, Lucius
Wright VS.. commissioners. |. 90 |
d. M. Soliday, county clerk,