Palestine daily herald. [volume] (Palestine, Tex.) 1902-1949, 1909-11-13

ceased ancestor, but plaintiff aver
that said ]. NJ. Mora attempted tt
convey same to James Bradshaw by {
certain instrument in writing, dated
Nov. 6, 1916, and duly recorded in the
deed records of Anderson county Oh
the 9Th day of Nov. 1916, in Vol. H
page 80, same being a Spanish docu
ment and translated in Vol. 67, page
10, of said deed records.
Sixth. That defendants, heirs of
| Jesse Duren, claim some interest in
the part of said land on said ]. NJ.
Mora 2 league survey by virtue of a
certain instrument in writing, dated
February 9, 1857, and recorded in said
deed records, Feb. IA, 1857, in Vol.
H, page u, wherein one James 7.
Eppinger attempted to convey to their
deceased ancestor, Jesse Duren, all
of his interest in said land and also
conveyance purporting to have been
made by Jose Moria Mora, Robert,
Benina and Susan Mora to the said
Jesse Duren, executed Feb. 9, 1857,
and recorded Feb IA, 1857, in Vol. H,
page 9 of said deed records.
Seventh. That defendants, heirs of
James Bradshaw, heirs OF. VIM. Brad
shaw, heirs of Moses Bradshaw, heirs
of Thomas Bradshaw, and heirs of
Nancy Trobough, claim some interest
in that part of said land on said Mora
grant by virtue of the hereinbefore
mentioned document from James Ma
ria Mora to James Bradshaw, and by
virtue of a certain judgment rendered
by. the district court of Nacogdoches
county, Nov. %, 1S4S, in Cause No
117S, styled VIM. Bradshaw vs. Naonie
Ware, and recorded in Anderson coun-
ty deed records, Vol. 81, page 1919, also
by virtue of a judgment of the district
court of Anderson county, Texas, rem
dered at the fall term 1858, in Cause
No. $50 2S, styled R. F. Mitchell vs.
VIM. Bradshaw ct al, and wherein the
land hereinbefore described was ad-
judged to VIM Bradshaw
Eighth. That defendants, heirs of
D. J. Lane, claim some interest in
said land on said Mora Grant by vir-
ture of a certain document, dated
Feb. %, 1859, and recorded April &c, |
1859, in Vol ], page 335 of said deed
records, whereby R. F. Mitchell at
tempted to convey to their deceased
ancestor, D. ]. Lane, % of his inter-
est in said land
Ninth. That defendants, heirs of
D. NJ Butler, claim some interest in
part of said land on both of said sur
veys by virtue of a certain judgment |
of the district court of Anderson coun-
ty, Texas, rendered at its October
term, 1868, in consolidated Causes
Nos. 1903 and 1913, styled D. M. But
Ter VS.. Augustus zoe, as shown by
rffrres OF As,s:aid-5>a,t;, v61. I, page s
z, wherein D. M. Butler recovered Iy
ON said zoe his interest in said al
nd. Of
That defendants, heirs of A. K. w. Sc
mes, claim some interest in part or
| of said tract hereinbefore de- d,
ribbed by virtue of a certain deed, d.
,ecuted Sept. 6, 1856, and recorded pl
ct IS, 1856, in Vol G, page 344 of pi
id deed records, wherein Jesse Ter So
and wife conveyed to their de- al
ased ancestors all of said tract on d.
e Vim. T. Miller survey and part of d.
id tract on the Mora survey. Ii
Eleventh. That defendants, the IL
.irs of j. A Utz, deceased, and heirs R
J. F and Rosena Utz, deceased, IL
aim some interest in said land by u
rtue of conveyance from j. F. pI
rounds and wife, dated Sept. %, Il
81, and recorded Nov. "a, 1892, in S;
ol. 4S, page SS4 of said deed records, v
Id by virtue of a certain vendors fe
an note executed by Nathaniel Gar d
IT, Jan. 9, 1884, and payable to ]. F. "
t. or ]. A. Utz, Jan. 1, 1885, given in CT
lrt payment for said land and de- Ii
ribbed in deed from J. F. Utz and CT
ife to Nathaniel Garner, dated Jan J.
1884, and recorded in Vol So, page st
a, of said deed records, but that said il
tie has long since been paid in l.!
H. 81
Twelfth. That said defendants, a
eirs of Nathaniel Garner and wife, q
Garner, claim some interest Il
said land by virtue of a certain 81
tie for $4,000, given by ]. w. Moore tf
said Garner in part payment for c,
id land, and described in the deed il
ON said Garner to said Moore, May #
1884, and recorded in Vol. 35, page ST
IS, of said deed records, but that II
id-note has long since been paid off Ia
I'd satisfied in full. a,
Thirteenth. That all the other de- q
ndants herein are asserting some
,rt of claim to said land, the charac- ii
r of which is to plaintiff unknown fc
Fourteenth. That if any of the said
,fendantS hereinbefOre mentioned s;