The Marion daily mirror. (Marion, Ohio) 1892-1912, 1909-05-12
SENATOR DoLLvERs GREAT ARGUMENT ON rae ALDRIcH Bill

able question: 1t is
presenting about for sever
strengthening position downward reyisns and
giving ndsputable you don't have the
Dick or Burton for the
Congressional by Senator Do
yer one of the iaie abest and best balanced
delivered Congress question liberal edu alton
on that subject 1t will be impossible adequate synopsis of
This great argument short speech would
probably I'LL ordinary TYNE That
Is going some But the speech The takes to read IT,
What Senator Dolver does that the sched
% OF "ooens IS too nigh the Dnsey law and has
in the AdicPayne schedule has been raised that
Mr. Adeh his utenants and Lodge denied that
this schedule had Doiver proved that had
been sprung by hnehad hidden confusing deceptive and complex am
endmn to the Dngey law the increased
aHs We're at the bees of monopoly apacy
and were nmica protection trained experts had
advised against them compensatory duties and added
qes on which they were nut in the
bill at the behest Henry James R. McCou of the Ark
wright club made millionaire monopis and not
by Adrih or any one else elected TO Tho National
Senate that they capitalists and
magns Of monopoly of the millions
OF American consumers and that finally
corpoaed into their bill interested ont
sders which they did understand draw out from
The protective emIneny logical in its adpa
zion to the development protection Of labor and
business when maintained within when it be-
zones Seu ior the eXortons of aace and the
monopoly defeats the end for which Senator Dol
liver must be remembered lifelong Republican one OF the
. leader
Dingley law was ena ed the industrial v m ~
been consolidated and Congress confronted with ST.
lent factories idle capital and therefore what might
have been adopted twelve entirely now 1t
Is our duty to reduce these tariff enterprises then have
corporations and ov ovatal and highly vat5 mon
opoes and changed conditions ex
trayagant extorionae airy.
Ut just matter of criticism admittedly
made by interested and Mr. Dngey confessed
eo' ~ " '"e present law had been written by the cotton
manufacturers and he said be downwads
tor mat very reason An objection schedule
u on o alleged ac One was that the amendments in the
en Adch bill raised the other was that
those amendments with the treasury
and originally suggested by manufacturers
sible enbe of the Senate
The woolens schedule originally established by the woogowe
mad manufacturers that foundation had been
built the wondousy objection to II Is that in
the main 1t has producers and
part in its bandfVork Arb oh
to is that the woo rolls .op poIso
subbing and growing waste and wooen and
mixed weaes there great nequy
cess of tariffs and made goods and
hence robbery of duties excep
these under schedule Dngey law These dus are
sandable honest
Worsted cloths cents per pound carry
sS per cent duty Same of the per pound carry
duty OF 9 per cent Blankets of price cents per
pound ay duty Blankets the average
value Of % 12 cents pound per cent
Blankets of the per pound carry an aver
age tarin of n cent.
Fannes valued under 40 average duty of l4s
In the whether of clothing cloth or ANYTHING
containing trace OF wool must be weighed
boots with weighed ND as wooenst4 cents nor nor
ana % per cent adVaoremnstead OF 80
" e compensatory duty added iIuminat
Ing analysis Of woos nkage manufacture discrimination favor
OF second class worsed wools
London prizes blankets by Hon Samuel
Dale eminent specialist analysis and eluc
dalton confirmed all other evidence.
Wozed woods have advantage woo as the
tarn for washed other is 2 cents
THAT tariffs woolen goods running per are ~
afvs nobody seriously
On cotton weave denied by ieutenans
nn he tariff rate had been raised but Dngy law
~as amended that new provisions dyeing
% counting threads classifying Jaccuards u
mysteries drapies threads In goods
that have enormously increase is shown
ty a bs follows.
Dingley ratas with Senate nh, ratos ON cotton ~ No.