Albuquerque morning journal. [volume] (Albuquerque, N.M.) 1903-1926, 1909-03-05


| harm man gnod on me Other nam
| wc must be- careful not to e~ncourag,
,ho n,aro nratanso ~ raoa fenlint
n-an,,facturo +, ma interest af MAJ
,i1naI noIiticai ,nhftion
uar. -. n
o''ouais ; -"
~ '''uu' Vl MS u Us
uip"n VI :" . ~ -.
my mar aeel,el 4"pa'ny ~
muse VINO nav |" ~ Vi suiie'
rom H. anu : qu's,tpll nv misuon
- " poilVA Nhlci. p .Nrls = ihol'as
II M'ah',nn., notnlns p uon' =
prevent q p',.e' ievt'ns petneen ~
h'Bi''a 49, ~ - - SUI
WIN eoisttitu" " sio"' ~ ~ "no
llor' ~ 1922 W IN,
70 rtaiiZe .la' ~ - - -
- 10 " "r".iIt'" nv 'ut p,'stIi1
ana lnteliectuat profess oI inc ne'
gro II Eerclse pr poiitIcai iibn-
chlse py M OF MS Sace W. arc
Intelligent ana well-to-do VIII be ac-
quiesced IN, ana the right to vote VII
be withheld only from the ignorant
and irresponsible Of poth races
There IS one other matter to which
I shall refer. 1t was made the subject
40 .r a,rino ~ alan.
: g." IN. ~
''on' ana 'alH iV' a. lo'S' d p"S9''s
reference now. NV distinguished pre-
decessor has given much attention
TO the canse Of LABOR with whose
struggle tor better Things ne has
shown the sinecrest sympathy. AZ
his instance, congress mas passed
tac Dill fixing the llabllitN ~ inter
state carriers to their employees for
injury sustained in the course Of en-
ploymcnt. aholishlng the rule or tel
low-scrVant and tho common law
rule as to contrihutorN negligence,
an substituting therefor b ~so-called
RUE OF comparatlVe heshseneo' i,
mas also passou Z MN MIhs w
compensation on oVeihincl' I'm
ploNes TOR injuries SuSta'h'u IN III,
employ q inc government r"u
tie h~'Ehsence ol 'lS supeilol; A. ,los
also passed y m"ue. INN iapoi Jaw
lor the lM)lstrlct o. 1uluhlpld, ~ pit
Vlous an "ipi'i "'i't
Jaw i"I in'Vls'"tc 'piii"'r, "ii
roaus allu tn"ti 'i"PiosN CIV
Tor the appncatloh VI snl',N NV ="
10 save inc uN.s an" "n'oS oi V'h11
ploNfs o. ih,e,s,a'o r"ilIu1us +"
lpc'll pnsaeu. Nuuitiuh"l i,EiS'al.uH -
thls KIM was pisseu ny 'hp ou'S'h's
congress
| wish to say that IN so far as
can, | hope to promote the enact
OF further legislation Of this
character. ! am strongly convinced
the government should make IL
self as responsible To employees MUIR
ed in It's employ as an interstate ran
way corporation is made responsible
by federal law to It's employees; and
| shall be glad whenever any add1-
tional reasonable safety device can
be invented to reduce the loss of life
and limb among railway employees
to urge congress to require its ad-
option by interstate railways.
Another labor question has arisen
which has awakened the most excit-
I'd discussion. That is in respect To-
he power Of federal courts to
ssue iniunctions in Industrial dis
,utcs. As To that. my convictions are
liked Take away from the courts. if II
be taken away. the power TO
ssue iniunctions in labor disputes. (
ma ii would create a privileged class
the lahorers and save the law
ess among their number from a
needed remedy available to all
nen for tho protection of their bust
.ess against laviess invasion The
roposition that business is not a
ropprtv or pecuniarN right which
an be- protected hv equitable in
is utterly without FONDA
ion Il, preeedent or reason. The
ropositiou is usually linked with one
, mako the secondary boycott law
al. such a proposition is at va
with the American instinct
nd will find no support IN my iudg-
when submitted to the Ameri-
an people. The secondary boycott
an instrument Of tyranny and
lght TO hc made illegitimate.
Tho fssufpr ~ a re-