Weekly journal-miner. [volume] (Prescott, Ariz.) 1908-1929, 1909-06-16
DISTRICT COURT
OPENSIN PRESCOTT
Judge Edward NJ Doe Presides Over His
First Session of That Body in This
District--Many Gases of Importance
Are to Come up for Settlement.


Lone Pine Mining company, versa,
George W. X. Fallon. receiver of the
Pan American Mining company. cou.
tinucd for the term.
Territory of Arizona, T.. y. Clark,
attorney general, versus I. II. Brown
ct al, directors of the Long Beach
and Arizona Mining company, con
tinued for the term.
The Heart of Arizona Copper com
pany versus Loyal A. Osborne ct al,
Sc, for hearing July IL.
The jeffrey Manufacturing company
versus Crown King Mines company,
set for hearing July IL.
l.. II. Confar versus the Arizona Tx.
ploration company ., al, jury ease,
set fer June %.
sixty days additional time granted
attorneys in the case Of Albert NJ.
Jones versus j. ". sullivan, to file
an additional statement of facts on
appeal.
Charles r.. finney versus the Ari-
iona smelling company, stricken from
the calendar.
George a. King versus Carl Rees.
dismissed on motion of attorney for
defendant.
Cecil q. Fcnnell aud the Bank of
Arizona versus the Consolidated Ari.
zona Smelling company, continued for
the term on motion Of plaintiff.
T.. ID. Seaton versus +. X. O'Brien,
Hite Gold Mining company versus +.
X. O'Brien, set for hearing July Is.
David Auch versus the Alto Gold
Mining company, continued for the
term.
Cling Hong versus Lillian Powers.
dismissed with the stipulation that the
plaintiff return trunk and clothing
secured under attachment from the
defendant.
sixty days additional time granted
attorney in the ease Of the Brooklyn
Arizona Mining company versus
Jharles c. Miller ct I, to file add.
ionsl statements acts on appeal.
Demurrer in the &c of Bayless
md Coffin versus ; :, Z. L. p. Rail.
way company, set Tor hearing Friday
afternoon at 2 o'clock.
William 4. Ginder versus George
". McGheo, dismissed.
Lopez and wingHeld versus Blake
baker and A. T.. King versus Blake
baker and u. II. Smith set for hear.
ny July 10.
The admission of proof in the ease
4 j. II. Cordes versus l.. l.. DUEL,
efault, was set for Friday afternoon
I 9 o'clock.
Japanese Club versus the Bank OF
Irizona, set for hearing July II.
George sayers versus George Mar
arctic, set for hearing July II.
William II. Gardner versus the
White Gold Mining company. set for
caring July 10.
NJ. j. Thompson versus J. X. Lowry.
heriff, and j. G. Snow, dismissed.
W. +. buckingham versus the stand.
I'd Smelling and Refining company.
1t for hearing July IA.
A. J. Edwards versus the White
old Mining company, J. W. Walker
ersus the White Gold Mining com
any and Peter Brunck versus w. NJ.
wens. set for hearing July 10.
j. Spencer, Clarence Manning, W.
Farrell and George Mccullough, nc.
ised Of burglary near Constellation,
formed the court that they did not
esire counsel, as did also James Har
son of Jerome.
Arguments in support and against
motion to quash the services Of
,mplaint on Attorney Linnie in the
Use Of Cyrus +. Beck versus the Nc
inley Mining company were heard,
nd the motion taken under advise.
L
ent. with instructions to Attorney
eRoy Anderson to submit his author.
les.
The suit is for the collection Of
images for injuries received by Beck
lille working in a shaft being sunk
, the Mckinley Mining and Develop
emit company.
Arguments for and against a new
ial in the case Of George Whitaker
'rsus ID. W. Thomas we're heard and /
% motion taken under sdvisement.
he suit is over the title to the waters
Big Bug creek.
Default WAS entered in the case of !
w. Bennett OF al. II