The Birmingham age-herald., 1908-05-28
RECORD OF THE COURTS

AEalnst the Blrmlngham Railway, Light and Power company in the circuit court yesterday by Lillian Gardner. this amount being claimed for damage to q trunk and its contents. The plaintiff all legged that in accordance with instructions of the defendant she had placed at Hill- man station, on the East Lake car line, trunk containing wearing apparel. tho defendant advising that they would pick it up and bring to Birmingham. The trunk was placed there on Saturday aft ernoon, but 1t is alleged the defendant failed to move 1t until Monday. During the time between Saturday and Monday the plaintiff states that it rained, soaking the trunk and contents, running them completely.
 The suit of J. M. Mehand vs. the Bir- mingham Terminal company was on trial in the third division of the city court yesterday.
 In the second division of the city court the suit of the B. F. Poole Investment company vs. the Soss-Sheffield Steel and Iron company continues on trial
 In the chancery court In the case of NJ. M Davis vs. James Spakes and others a decree was handed down confirming the registers report of sales and ordering a reference to ascertain balance due by John M. Sims.
 The case of Moses Mackln vs. Beulah Macklin was dismissed; also the cases of Henry Austin vs. Florence Austin, Julia Lyles vs. William Lyles, J. ". Cotting- ham vs. R. G. Hamlet, Annie Lou Car lyle vs Frank Carlyle and Austin Pope vs. Susie Pope.
 Dockets in the civil courts for today are as follows:
 Circuit Court.
 Judge A. A. Coleman's division, jury.
 R. Y Jones vs. L. L. Stephenson. as- sumpst: Jack Brindey vs. Alabama Great Southern Railroad company. dam ages Tony Williams vs. Sloss-Sheffield Steel and Iron company, damages B. F Pool Investment company vs. Sloss- Sheffield Steel and Iron company, dam- ages; w. w. Lampl<in vs. Electric City Loan and Pledge company. appeal by de- fendaht.
 Judge A. O. Lanes Division, jury:
 Walter Brown vs. Woodward Iron com- pany, damages; Mrs D. A. Cochrane vs. Birmingham Railway Light and Power company damages Samuel H. Rhodes vs Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company damages: T. O. Lathem, pro ami, vs Republic Iron and Steel damages; Sam Brittle vs J. E. Dedham ct al, appeal by defendant.
 City Court.
 First Division. Judge Ferguson, jury:
 Mrs Nora E. Miller vs. Mrs. w. 1T. Green, attachment; Mary E. White vs. J L. Mattingly ct als., trover; Fred Moes- ser vs P G. Smith, assumpsit; J. N. Alexander vs. Charles Perlio, assumpst: Evans Brothers Construction company ys. Chris Colias ct al, assumpsit: Mrs. Selma Agrcola vs Levy Art company. dam ages Plen McCluskey vs. Alabama Great Southern Railroad company. appeal by defendant J. H. Scruggs vs. Genia Wood- ward, defendant, and William Moore ct als. garnshees, attachment; Gray & Dudley Hardware company vs Von L. Thompson. assumpsit; A. l.. Fulenwider ct als vs. Couch & Daly ct als, assump- sit.
 Second Division, Judge Senn, jury:
 Riley Kuster vs. Tennessee Coal. Iron and Railroad company, damages; Onie Kuster vs Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company, damages: Kate John on vs. Birmingham Railway. Light and Power company, damages; Catherine Ed wards vs Birmingham Railway, Light 
 Third division. Judge Nesmith. jury
 R. H. Stoke vs. Western Union Tele. graph company. damages; Frank Morgan vs George Ward ct al.. damages: Frank Turner vs. Birmingham Railway. Light and Power company. damages; Allious G. Pinson vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company damages.
 Chancery Court.
 E. S. Rev vs. Jesse Rev; Lathrop Lumber company vs. Horace Newcome; William M. Walker. trustee, vs. Lucy E. Smith ct al: C. A. Green vs. Mary L. Green; Hattie Woodfn vs. Alonzo Wood- fin; J. H. Duke vs. Ably Duke; W. H. Ferguson vs. Walter Hoffman ct al; James NJ. Maxwell, admin Istrator de bons non. vs. Matte Temple ct al; Jose phne Watkins vs. John Watkins; Will liam H. Hodges ct al vs. William H. Merritt; Viola H. Venekens vs. Victor Nenekens.
 Ads Illustrated witt good cuts af0