Middlebury register. (Middlebury, Vt.) 1886-1937, 1908-10-02
TAFT AS A SPEAKER.
His Talks to the People Winning
Many Votes.
DOESN'T POSE AS AN ORATOR.

AUS TIaI1ly-hepupllCan Oanol-
dates Clearness and Sincerity Carry
Conviction.
From being decidedly apprehensive
Is to the outcome of Judge Taft's
ipeaking tours Republican leaders are
now convinced that one of the wisest
moves of the campaign was the deci-
sion to let the Republican candidate
visit as many sections of the country
us possible between now and election
day and talk to as many voters as the
time will permit. When speaking tours
for Taft were first discussed the oppo-
nents of the plan based their opposi-
ton on the fact that as an orator Taft
cannot be compared to Bryan. They
argued that Taft, who makes no pre-
tense to oratory, would be placed at
disadvantage appearing on the stump
against the gifted Nebraskan But
Judge Taft himself solved the problem
and cleared the whole situation with
one sentence in his recent speech at
Sandusky, o.
Il cannot dwell in the cerulean blue,
but have to deal with facts" he de-
cared. 1t is this dealing with facts in
a clear, dispassionate manner that has
made William Howard Taft what he
is, that will cause him to gain strength
every time he appears in public Taft's
best friends cannot claim for him that
he Is an orator. But he can tell the
truth and does tell it. He will not have
70 MI af
what should be done. He will not have
to plead with silvery eloquence for the
alleged downtrodden nor call on 1.-The
masses" to rise up and save the coun-
try from the ruin which Bryan has
been predicting and finding various
panaceas for during the past twelve
years.
cold, clear cut facts, to tell the truth
about himself, to give to his auditors
clear and unmistakable idea Of what
Taft the man is and what he stands
for. And this he can do, and do well.
By nature he is frank and open. 1t
would be difficult for him to dissemble
If he wished to do so.
Gus impressions on his audiences. Bry-
an never fails to tickle his audiences.
In most instances he arouses enthusi-
asm, but it is an enthusiasm which
rarely lasts. Those who listen and
applaud go away and forget. With
the Taft audiences it is different. By
the cleaIness of his exposition and the
hoo ,,fn CT, - 1T h.
carries conviction. His auditors are
soon impressed by two things-Taft's
ability and Taft's sincerity.
THAT man means what he says" is
a comment frequently heard after Taft
has spoken. Another Taft character
lstic that is winning many friends for
the Republican candidate among those
who knew nothing of him before they
saw and heard him is his great cour-
age. He says what he thinks, and
says it in such way that it remains
fixed in the minds Of those who hear
him. At Athens, O., he was address
ing 400 union coal miners. He told
them about having issued injunctions.
II issued them" he said, because
the rights Of the plaintiffs demanded
1t. When / am on the bench / enforce
the law. And 1 have no apology to
make"
For a minute there was absolute ST.
lence, dramatic in its intensity. Then
the 400 miners broke not merely into
applause, but into enthusiastic cheers.
After the meeting they were heard ex-
pressing their views.
"That man is on the level" said one.
HE doesn't hand out any CON talk.
He knows where he stands and is not
afraid to come straight out with
thing He amt the orator Bryan is,
but he says things that Bryan wouldn't
dare say"
Unlike many of Bryan's utterances,
Tafts utterances will bear inspection.
He will make no declaration that is
open to doubt. 81 have to deal with
facts" he said. In some of his
speeches Bryan, intoxicated with the
sound of his own words. frequently
makes statements not entirely trust
worthy Taft has been too long on the
bench, too long in high government po-
sitions, where his utterances carried
weight, to permit Of his making care
less statements. Furthermore, Taft
possesses to a marked degree the abf-
ity to discuss the most intricate sub
Jects in the simplest language. He
proved this most conclusively at San
dusky when he made perfectly plain to
his audience the development of anti
trust legislation and the powers and
limitations Of the federal government.
Everybody knew exactly what he was
talking about and understood it clear
ly, yet there were few in the audience
who realized that he was discussing