The Birmingham age-herald., 1908-01-13
RECORD OF THE COURTS,

morning in their grind on the spring term of 1908. With the exception of the first division of the criminal court all of the Jefferson county courts be- gan the spring term last Monday and all did much work during the week. With the criminal court in full blast this morning the scene will be a busy one at the court house.
 Judge Samuel L. Weaver will pre- side in the first division of the crim- inal court today, but Judge Dan A. Greene being unable to attend court on account of illness there is no regu- lar judge to. take charge in the second division. special judge will be ap- pointed by the governor, however. and the work of the court will be dis pensed with in the usual order.
 In Judge Lanes division of the cir cult court the following cases are set for trial today:
 Will Davis vs. E. L. Higdon, damages; R. M. Moss vs. Southern Railway com pany, damages; Emmett Adams vs. Southern Railway company, damages; A. G. Brown vs. Leeds Portland Cement company, damages; Francis M. Law renee vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Rail- road company. damages; Charley Scott vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company, damages; Joe Ball vs Sloss- Sheffield Steel and Iron company, dam ages; Harris Transfer and Warehouse company vs. Alabama Great Southern RQilrnad la ma Hunnicutt, pro ami, vs. Seaboard Air Line, damages; Lewis Roberts vs. Bir- mingham Southern Railroad company, damages.
 The following docket is set for trial in Judge Coleman's division of the circuit court today:
 Shugart & Bell vs. Ned Jones ct al, W. E. Leadford, ejectment, special; D. W. Parker vs. Smiley & Sons, damages; S. D. Johnson vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; Hamp Murphy vs. Atlanta and Birming- ham Air Line Railway company, dam ages; W. H. Blankenship. administra- tor, vs. St. Louis and San Francisco iseiiiOdo SoiiPdh9, bdiiio6tSy A1hiihSb Mosley ys. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company. damages; c. N. Williams vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; Ula Reed vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; C.. M. Parker vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, dama ges.
 Fo1I +r;o in the first division of the city court today, Judge Ferguson presiding:
 Desmond & Ryan ct als. vs Worlds Best Soap company ct als.. assumpsit; A. Shugarman vs. Rubie Manley, de- tinue; Alabama National bank vs. Will liam Vaughan ct all, assumpsit; Ala bama National bank ys. J. W. David son, assumpsit; Alabama Steel and Wire company vs. Budwig & Meyer Fire Brick company, assumpsit; J. W. Wood ct al. vs. D. J. Ponceler, certiorari by defendant; Palace Livery company vs. Peoples Home Telephone company, tro- yer; Mrs. Katie N. Milton vs. Dick Wray alias Richard Wray, ejectment; Superior Coal and Coke company vs. BuQWlR & M6ytT Ire COHlpdHy , assumpsit; w. D. Tiffin vs. Pete Mey- CTS, appeal by defendant; Will McFar- lin & Go. vs. Norman Webb ct al dam ages; Norman Webb ct als. vs. Will Me Farlin & Co.,, ta als., assumpsit; Will McFarlin & Co. ct al. vs. Norman Webb ct als, damages; Norman Webb ct als. vs. Will McFarlin & Co.,, damages; Nor man Webb ct als. vs. Sloss- -She effield Steel and Iron company, damages.
 Judge Nesmith presiding. the following cases are set for trial in the second di- vision of the city court today:
 Rosetta Williams vs. Birmingham Rail- way, Light and Power company, dam- ages; Anna l.. Maddere. pro ami, vs Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; Lilsie Rawls vs. Bir- mingham Railway, Light and Power com pany, damages; Mary Gambill vs. Bir- mingham Railway, Light and Power com pany, damages; w. J. Webb ct al. vs Jefferson County Sanitary Sewer commits sion, damages; John D. Lott vs Alabama Great Southern Railroad company, dam- ages; Mrs M. H. Pierce vs. Birmingham
 
 Whited vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company. damages; Mrs Jane Whatey vs. Addington & Hewitt ct al. damages; Morgan Jordan vs Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, dam. ages.
 In the third division of the city court Judge Sharpe presiding, the following docket is set for trial today:
 Douglas Ward vs Birmingham Railway Light and Power company, damages; c H.. Hutchinson vs. Birmingham Railway Light and Power company, damages John Catechis, administrator, vs Louis vile and Nashville Railroad company damages George Hull vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, dam ages; Nora c. Gillespy, administratrix vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Pow, CT company, damages; Nicholas Malatatis vs. Birmingham Southern Railroad com pany, damages; George E. Brown vs N s. Turner damages; Cap Stramler vs. A A. Gambll. damages; Fred Goldstein vs A. A. Gambill damages; Frank McCleskir vs Louisville and Nashville Railroad company, damages; Albert Veitch pro am vs Birmingham Railway. Light and Pow CT company, damages.