Amador ledger., 1908-05-15
COURT
PROCEEDINGS
HON. n. c. RUST. JUDGE

Estate of h. b. O'Neil. to
show cause why.
Estate of John Brazkovich. Order
appointing II. b. Potter admins
traitor.
Estate Of Nick Sky. Order appoint-
ing H. E. Potter administrator.
Estate of Andrea Biggio. Order
appointing appraisers.
Bank of Amador Go. VS.. Mary j.
Hartman. demurrer withdrawn aud
defendant given 30 days to answer.
Fred Rabb vs. lone Il Il. Il. X. Go.
Demurrer submitted without argu-
ment.
Chas. Kretcher vs. W. W. Fitzgerald
Demurrer Withdrawn and defendant
granted 30 days TO answer.
Steve Lobravcz VS.. Geo. Turcouo-
vich. - Demurrer submitted ON 20, 5
and days for filing briefs by the
respective parties.
| Amador Co. Lumber Co. VS. A.
Ratio and Rev. W. II. Moreland-.
Judgment III favor of plaintiff but
they shall take nothing againct Rev.
W. IL. Moreland. This suit was com
menced in July 1905, for tho payment
of SGG3. II due the plaintiff for lam Der
used IN the construction Of tho Bpis-
copul church in Jackson, Amador
county.
f. j. Binkman VS.. Charles j. John
son ct al-Demurrer of c. b. j ohnsOn
fled.
e. G.. Wooste VS.. Martha Wooster
lnterlocutory decree of divorce filed.
Della NJ. Fullen VS.. John II. FulIen
-lnterlocutory decree OF divorce
filed.
Amador County Lumber Co. IS. A.
Ratio, Biggio Ounce and john Cuneo.
Judgment as prayed for against de
fendant Ratio, but nothing against
the other two. A. Ratio became in
de5ted to the lumber company in
July, 1904, in the sum of s202. 80 for
lum Der used in the erection Of a
building on the land of Ounce,
about eight miles east of jackson.
They also asked for costs and 500
attorneys fees.
Amador County Lumber Co. VS.. A.
Ratio and q. b. Parma. Judgment as
prayed for against defendant Ratio,
but nothing against Parma A. Ratio
became indebted to the lumber com
pany in September, 1905, in the sum of
1857. 90, for lumber used in the erec-
block II, Jackson, belonging to q. Ii.
Parma, but failed to pay the amount.
They also asked for costs and 500
attorneys fees.
People VS.. q. Lepori. date for
trial to he set for May %.
Kate Pitt VS.. Peter Derania. -Argu-
ment continued until May 23.
John Nickolaus ct al VS.. j. G.
Stuart ct al. Demurrer submitted.
New eases
Joseph Oneto VS.. Carleton Bartlett
administrators of the estate of Samuel
W. Bright-This suit is tor the re-
covery of balance due the plaintiff
on loan of $1,000 made to the de-
PENDANT in Nov, 1903 lie prays for
jugdmen in the sum of S2l60, being
principal and interest to Oct, 1907.
Petition of Libby A. Sargent he
petitions the superior court to be-
come sale trader on the grounds
that her husband, Jacob IL. Sargent
is unable to properly support her and
their children. Sne intends to carry
on q general farming business, and
buying and selling live stock at their
place near Middle Bar. The amount
Of capital to be- invested is about $500.
h. j. Mott VS.. Plymouth and Alpine
Mining Company. This is suit to
quit title to portion of the S e d
Of S W u of 2-7-lO.
W. 7. Turner VS.. James e. Shealor
ct al. This is a suit to recover $3.50
alleged to be due on promisorv note
given June ,, 1902, interest at Ia
per cent per mouth, scared by a
mortgage on l2) acres in 6-7-l3.