The Penn's Grove record., 1908-01-24
sign the small for the sake of the
great, the present for the sake of the

was ulSIduI3 dppOdTSu luSlSulLCduL.
He had no patience to wait, no faith
to believe in the real value of any
thing that was not material, no self
restraint to keep him from instant
surrender to the demand for present
qualification.
This is the power of all appeal to
passion-that it is presents with us
now, to be had at once. 1t Is claim-
ant, iTnperious; insistent, demanding
to be satisfied with what Is actually
present. 1t has no S for a far-off
good. It wants immediate profit.
This is temptation, alluring to the
eye, whispering in the ear, p%lucking
by the elbow, offering satisfaction
now. Here and now-not hereafter;
this thing, that red pottage. there.
not an ethereal, uns%ubstantial thing
like a birthright. What is the good
of it if we die? and we are like to die
senses demand. In the infatuation of
parison; the birthright is a poor thing
compared with the red pottage.
1t is the distortion of vision which
passion produces, the exaggeration of
the present which temptation creates,
liz oIlO1l 1OOh n Tx 81 SdJs
m discrediting the value OF the
thing lost. The vivid, lurid descrip-
ton in the Proverbs OF the young
man, void Of understanding, shared
in the street by the strange woman,
| gives both these elements of the eff
feet of passionate weak surrender
to impulse and the distortion of Wis
ion which blinds to the real value Of
what is given up for the qualification:
"He goeth straightway as an OK goeth
to the slaughter, till a dart strikes
through his liver; as a bird hasteth
to the snare, and knoweth not that
it is for his life."
But it is not merely lack of self
control which Esau displays by the
question of our text. 1t is also lack
of appreciation of spiritual values.
In a vague way he knew that the
birthright meant a religious blessing,
and in the grip of his temptation that
looked to him as purely a sentiment,
not to- be seriously considered as on
a par with a material advantage.
The profane man, the secular man,
may not be just a creature of i'm
pulse;. he may have his impulses in
good control, but he has no place
for what is unseen. He asks, natur-
ally, What shall it profit? Men who
judge by the eye, by material re-
turns only, who are frankly secular,
think themselves great judges of
profit; and they, too, would not make
much of a birthright If it meant only
something sentimental, as they would
call it. The real and not the ideal,
the actual and not the visionary, the
thing seen and not the thing Unseen
they would not hesitate more than
Esau over the choice between the
pottage and the birthright. They
judge by substance, and do not I'M
derstand about the faith which is the
substance Of things hoped for, the
evidence of things not seen.
How easy it is for all of us to drift
into the class of the profane, the sec
ular, persons as Esau, to have our
spiritual sensibility blunted, to lose
our appreciation of things unseen, to
be so taken up with the mean of liv-
ing that we forget life itself and the
things that alone give it security
and dignity! How easy, when soul
wars with sense, to ~depreciate every
thing that is beyond sense and let the
whole moral tone be relaxed! There
is much cause for the apostle to warn
us to Look diligently lest there be
among US any profane person as
Esau who for one morsel of meat
sold his birthright."
We, too, can despise our birthright
by living far below our privileges
and far below u spiritual opportun-
tiles. We have our birthright as
sons of God, born to an inheritance
as joint heirs with Christ. We be-
long, by essential nature, not to the
| animal kingdom, but to the kingdom
Of heaven; and when we forget it and
live only with reference to the things
of sense and time, we are disinherit-
ing ourselves, as Esau did. The sec
ular temptation strikes a weak spot
in all of us, suggesting that the spir-
itual life, Gods love and holiness,
the kingdom of heaven and His right
e%ousness, the life of faith and prayer
and communion, are dim and shad-
owy things, as in a land that is very
far off. what profit shall this birth
right do to me?"
What shall it profit? seems a sane
and sensible question to be consid-
cred in a business-like fashion. 1t
is the right question to ask; but it
has a wider scope and another appli-
cation. What profit the mess of pot
tage, if I lose my birthright? What
profit the momentary qualification
of even imperious passion, if we are
resigning u rue life and losing the
clear vision and the pure heart?
What profit to make only provision
for the flesh, if of the flesh we reap
but corruption? What profit the
easy self-indulgence, if we are barter
ing peace and love and holiness and
Joy? What shall it profit a nan If
he gain the whole world land not
merely a contemplate mess of pot
tage) and lose his own soul?" What
profit if, in the insistence of appetite,
men go like an OK to the slaughter,
knowing not that it is for their life?
THUS Esau despised his birthright. F."
A RuiIder of Character.