The Washington herald., 1908-04-24

JCSTICE WRIGHT
No. 5eio6. Metropolitan Printing Company vs..
/ Luckett, Judgment by default At,orBsys. Branden-
/ burg & BrandetbHg
No. 1880. GiddeR vs.. Miller: On trisL Attorneyz
\ BeGTy 4 Minor and H. b RoEland-Leon TobTiner.
Assignments for to-day-Motious
/ No. ], Enamel Metal Company rs. Rau Attor,
ueys. Tucker kenyon-Brsndenburg & Brsnden-
/ burg
No. 2 Gicbner rs. Hill Attorneys, L ]. Msther
/ and c. T. Hendler-W. A. Johnston.
/ No, B. Tiozzo Ts. Christrando. Attorneys. Loving
/ Foster.
| No 5 Hudson rs Pickford- Attorneys. A. A.
( LiIsc0mb-Aladdox 4 Galley.
/ No 4. Daish. trustee. vs. Zeh. Attorneys, E. H.
| Thomas-C. J. F. Croft and Edwin Forrest
| No 5. DipphaTd Lipphard Attorneys, Ian
/ Heidman-C. H. Bauman.
No 6. shafer Us Nieolaide. Attorneys. H. "
/ Sohon--Blair.
No Z United States tx rel. Lowe rs Secretary
I Of Interior Attorneys c. H. Merillat-Stusrt Nc
NamaTa.
No 6 Jones vs. Ready. Attorneys. Arthur Peter
No 3 King rA Douglas Attorneys Gordon &
GoudOn-COins
No. 10 Parsons vs. Gordon. Attozns,s S. H
Giesey-W. E. Lester.
No L. United states ez rel. Thogpe rs. Secretary
OF the Interior Attorneys. Hamilton, Colbert
Yerkes & Hamilton.
No y Sullivan rs Buscher Attorneys, E. A.
Jones aud @, G. Shinn-A. A. Lipsoomb.
No B. Metzeer vs. Metzger. Attorneys. q. B.
9Ioult0n and W. ". Millan-C. A. Douglas and
V. z. Wallace.
No H. Bryan. administrator, vS Washington
Railway and Electric Company. Attorneys. R. II.
Mcneil and L. H. David-C. A. Douglas and g. P,
Hoover.
No Is. Jones vs.. Dorsett Company. Attorneys
j. C. say-Banard & johnson.
No. l6 Merchants National Bank IS Mount Yer
non and Portland Stables Attorneys. Syme &
Fowle-Douglas Baker & Sheriff.
Assignments for Monday. April 2;
No. 57, Morgan vs.. Baltimore snd Ohio Railroad
Company Attorneys F. y. Blaekis.onA-Hsmiltou,
Colbert. Yerkes Hamilton.
No. 5o5. zirkie vs.. Chesapeake and Potomac Tele-
phone Company. Attorneys Arthur PeteF-J. J.
Darlington.
No ssI United States to use Of Carter and
Clarke vs.. United States Fidelity and Guaranty
! Company Attorneys. Hamilton, Colbert Yerkes &
Hsmilton-M II. Beach.
No. S72 Herrell & Bro. vs. Kelly ct al. Attor-
nays. T. S Maloney and Douglas Baker Sheriff.
e. A. Jones and Leo Simmons
No. @l. Nash vs. District Of Columbia. At
toneys. c. ". ClSEett-E II Thomas.
No. 800. Montrose Lumber Company vs.. Heatoa.
Attorneys Ralston & siddons and T. W. Wheatley
e S. DuTsl, Ir
No. $50. Hennessy vs.. Chase. Attorneys. Nc
Gowan, Servsn & Mohun and Nathaniel Wilson and
Clarence K. Wilson-W. J. Lambert,
No. iS5. Han Us. Capital Traction Company. At
torneys Leon Tohrner-R. r Perry & Son
and Potomac Railroad Company ct al. AttorneyA
A. s. Worthington-H 3 Afico1. Hamilton,
Colbert. Yerkes Hamilton. and McKenHey &
FlanneTy.
No. gl Barnes Us. Slater ct al Attorneys.
Turner & Mtchell-G. F. Williams.
Circuit Court no. ,.
JUSTICE ANDERSON.
No. 476s6. Potomac Dredng Company rs. Colum-
bin Sand Dredging Company; On trial Attorneys.
Hamilton, Colbert Yerkes & Hanilton-McCam-
mon & Hayden and s. d. Bradley.
No. 1885, Reeves vs.. Browne: Judgment BY de-
iauit against garnashee Attorney. & p Emig.
No 1851. Everett vs. Harvey; verdict for cent
and Judgment forthwith. Attorneys, J. S. Easily
Smith-R. Z. Mattingly.
No. 5O2lo. Valentine vs. Davis; Judgment against
defendant. Attorneys. Mcneil & Mcneil.
No. 1854. Lukens vs. Washington. Alexandra and
Mount Vernon Railway Company; bill Of exceptions
signed and ordered Of record Attorneys T. s.
Bailey and R. T. strickland-A. A. Hoehling. il.
Assignments fer today-motions;
No. l. Mears vs. Jones. Attorneys, c. L. Frailey
Arthur Peter.
No z international Trust Company vA Crook.
Attorneys, W. C. Clephsne-W. J. Lambert aud
Il. H. Yeatman.
No. 5. yanderift vs.. Lansburgh. Attornsyh Z
l. Gies-WolE g. Rosenberg.
Ne. J. Newburgn ys. Sims, executor Attorneys,
j. II. Adriaans-F &. Mitchell
No. 5. Johnston Browning & Barnes. AttoT-
neys. Z A. jones ard 6. G. Shinn-A. A. Boeh-
ling, IT, and r. G. Donaldson.
No s. Grimm rs Gibbs. Attorneys. Z. L Giss-
Il. r. Classic.
No. Z. Ferguson Contracting company Fs. Coal
ana Coke RaiiNay Company. Attorneys. Carlisle,
Easby Smith. auo Bmton-Darlington and Foulkner.
No. s Kyle Ts. Realty Banking and Trust CON-
pany. Attorney, B. F. Leighton.
No. Q. Donaldson vs. National Auto Firs Alarm
Company. Attorneys. Cole Donaldson.
Nc. 10. Harnan ct al. vs. n. Z. T0nopah Mining
Company. Attorneys, r. G. D0nsldson-H II.
Classic and Z. r. Perry & Son.
No Il Burroughs Cave. Attorneys II. Z B.
Atkissonr-J. S. Easily Smith.
No. l2 Pitt GIN. Attorneys, G. s Hiliyer-
W E. Richardson.
30. Is. nu Rant LsImber Company vs.. Southern
galway Company Attorneys, Y. 2 Wallace
Hamilton. ColbSrt, Terkee & HsmItcnx