The Brandon news. (Brandon, Miss.) 1892-1961, 1908-01-23
T He PULPIT.
A BRILLIANT SUNDAY SERMON BY
THE REV. @. G. MILLS.
Subject: Spirit of the Lords Day.

Brooklyn, N. Y.-The Rev. Grover
G. Mills, pastor Of Pilgrim Chapel,
preached Sunday morning on "The
Spirit of the Lords Day." taking as
his texts Romans 1875: Zone man
esteemeth one day above another: an
other esteemeth every day alike. Let
every man be fully persuaded in his
own mind" and Mark 2:27: "The
Sabbath was made for man and not
man for the Sabbath" Among other
things Mr.. Mills said:
The glory of the Christian religion
Is Its universally. 1t fits all sorts
and conditions of men, and when I'M
uerStood as Jesus meant it to be I'M
derstood, they receive it gladly, for
His appeal was always past tradition
to truth. The court of final appeal is
the spirit in man backed up by the
experience of the race. Christianity
is not the acceptance of a set of opin-
ions, nor the observance of ritual, sa-
cred places and days, nor the reiter-
ating OF numerous moral maxims, but
1t is getting the Hottest point of view
with regard to things in general and
ones relations to ones fellow men in
particular. All Jesus teaching looked
toward the unifying of the moral law.
All progress is from unity, up
through complexity back to unity on
a higher plane. In the beginning the
moral law was very simple Thou
shalt not eat the fruit Of the tree
that is, Evil is deadly, do not med
die with it." Here we have the re-
ligion of fear. Later mems notions
OF evil became hazy and we had the
books Of the law and the ten COM
mandments. This might be called the
religion Of restraint. 1t meant a Sc
ries of thou shalt nots." Every
thing was to be done by rule. The
evil was to be separate from the
good, one nation separate from an
other to. preserve it's holiness, one
meat set apart from the others, one
day sanctified. Then came Jesus with
desire to put spirit into religion
which should give it perennial fresh
ness. Man was no longer to consult
an authority to find whether he
should or should not do a certain
thing. He was to accept the guidance
of the inner light. He was not to
separate the evil from the good, but
to overcome evil with good" He
was to make the radiance Of the one
day suffuse all the days; he was not
to think of God afar off watching His
universe go; but as nearer than
breathing, closer than hands or feet"
he was not so much to be concerned
with getting men to heaven as get
ting heaven into the world This is
what may be called the religion of
the spirit. Now let us view the ques-
fiOn nf CI1ndou oh ~ l.
of this.
First, the old Sabbath of the Jews,
and as revived in great part by the
Puritans of three centuries ago, does
not measure up to the demands OF a
spiritual religion. Everything was
nicely regulated by rule. But the
man who takes his ethics predigested
is in danger of moral atrophy. The
body needs exercise or it will become
diseased; the intellect must be used
or it will become flabby; the con-
science must be trained or it will van
1sh into nothingness. The commu-
nifty is in duty bound to give this fac
ulty OF conscience as free play as con-
ditions will permit.
On the other hand, the strong peo-
pie, those who tend to question au-
thority and who demand a reason for
their obedience become more and
more blindly reactionary. Thus it is
dangerous to multiply restrictions be-
yond what is essential; because men,
feeling themselves cramped, break
the artificial barrier, but at the same
time there comes to them a feeling
OF outlines, their consciences are
hardened and they stand ready to
break every law, as opportunity Of
fers. The old Sabbath, therefore,
was legalistic, it took no account Of
mans attitude toward righteousness;
it only demanded that he fulfil the
letter of the law. We see the result
OF it in the Pharisees, who were strict
observers Of the Sabbath, but did not
hesitate to practice hypocrisy, to
grind the poor in the dust with un-
just taxation, and in general to leave
fellow feeling entirely out of their re-
lgion.
2. But the question is immediate
ly put, If the old Sabbath be abol-
ished, has not Sunday taken its place?
Not at all. Observance of Sunday
was commenced after the death Of
Jesus. 1t was not to take the place
of the Jewish holy day, but for time
the two ran side by side, Christians
keeping the Sabbath, with all its re-
strictions, on our Saturday, and cele-
brating the next day (our Sunday
with great rejoicing in honor of the
Lords resurrection. At the outset,
then, 1t was day of cheerfulness.
It was festival, with joy and glad
ness, and SO strong was the feeling
that this was as it ought to be that
we read in the "Epistle to Turibius,"
one Of our Oldest Documents 1.-THE
Manicheans have been convicted in
the examination which we have made
OF passing the Sunday, which is con-
secrated to the resurrection of our
Lord, in modification and fasting"
Truly, here is a case of the tables
turned.
All reasonable Christians will hold
that this is what Sunday ought to
mean-a day of cheerfulness and rec
reation. There should be nothing
blue" about it. It should be, in
truth, 'sthe golden clasp that binds
the volume Of the week - Rut when