The Guthrie daily leader. [volume] (Guthrie, Okla.) 1893-1996, 1908-09-10
DOCKET OF GORP0R-
ALTON commission

Following Is the docket Of corpora
ton commission for September 10:
Complaint No. EOS. D. H. Nash ct al,
Valiant. VS.. ST, Louis and San Fran
cisco Railroad Co. Asking for depot.
Complaint No. 20S. T J. Hinkey ct
all Chandler. VS.. ST. Louis & San
Francisco Railroad GO, Asking for
street crossing.
Complaint 10. 2l5ssis IS. Haywood.
Boynton. VS. ST. Bouis & San Fran
cisco Railroad co. Asking for spur or
switch
Complaint No. 2lS. W. K. Harper
et al, FOyil, VS.. St. Louis & San Fran
cisco Railroad Co. Asking for train
No. 407 TO. sop.
Complaint No. 2Si. T. J. Barnes ct
al, ldabei. vs. 81. IsQnis n San Fran
cisco Railroad CO S4s6ing for ample
shipping facilities.
Cita.SSn No 2 by the Corporation
Commission VS. ST. Louis 3 San Fran
cisco Railroad Co. Violation Of order
No. 10.
"Wednesday, septembsr is, 1908,
Complaint No 1913, w. J. Easkins
ct al, Jefferson, vs.@ Chicago, Rock
Island & Pacific Railway Go. Ask
ing for drainage.
Complaint No. 205, r 3. Ferwell ct
al, Agwan, VS.. Chicago, Rock 5slanc
& Pacific Railway Co Asking for de-
pot facilities.
Complaint No 207, e. r. Barnum ct
al. Driftwood. VS.. Chicago Rock Is
land & Pacific Railway Co asking
for telegraph station.
Complaint No. 2l6, T. i. Wade &
al. NARROW. VS.. Chicago, Rock Island
& Pacific Railway Co. Asking for
street crossing
Complaint No. 226 c. w Thursion
ct al, Dixon. VS.. Chicago, Rock Is
land G. Racifie Railway Co. Asking
for depot
Complaint No. 22S. N. G. Kemmer-
1y ct all, Wewoka. vs. Chicago, Rock
Island & Pacific Railway Co. Asking
for telephone in depot
Complaint No. 1884, First State Bank
et al. Talala. VS. ST Louis, Iron Noun.
tain 4 Southern Railway Co. Asking
that telegraph service be restored.
Complaint No i96- 6. r Shine Ell al,
Ballard, vs. Kansas City Southern Ra j.
way Co Asking for depot and agent,
Thursday, September II, 1908.
Complaint No 2l3, J. B Davis,
Gage. VS.. Atchison, Topeka & Santa
Fe Railway Co. Asking for spur or
switch.
Complaint 40. PA. ~. P Hardwick
Guthrie. VS. Atchison. Topeka & Santa
Fe Railway Co. Asking for better
drainage.
Complaint No. 2l7, Geo. A. White st
al. Fargo. vs.. AtchisOn. Topeka S3
"a Fe Railway Co. Asking for de POI
building and night agent.
Compliant No. 222, w. "a. Taylor et
al Shawnee VS.. Atchison, Topeka y
Santa re Railway Co Asking for
street crossing.
Complaint No. 212, Cherokee Alin y
Elevator Co. Cherokee, vs.. Atchison,
Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., and
Kansas City. Mckee s Orient Rail
way Co Asking physical connection.
Complaint No. 20, W. n. Clarkson
ct al. Blair, vs. Kansas CITY, Mexico
& Orient Railway 60. asking for tele-
phone In depot
Complaint No. 1ls. A. B Cox ct al,
Hobart, vs.. Kansas City, Mexico 4
Orient Railway Co Asking for sta
ton facilities at Cambridge.
Complaint No los. NJ. w Whelan
OF al, Overbrook vs.. Gulf. Colorado
& Santa Re RAILWAY co. ASKING for
depot and other facilttiea fHilf
Complaini No 227, j. c. Prescott ct
nf Frederick, vs.. W4ts4fn 2lsioip Uelei
graph Co Asking Tor CIV elstown Of
fiCe
Feieay. seRasmbsr IS. 1Sss.
Complaint No 2l9 Milton Hrown,
EafAula. IS. Missouri. 1susss & Texas
railway Go. Asking spg sireef cross
Rae
Complalnt 40. 2l9. Marfy Green u
.Aia Fhlltps. vs sIiksoeri, EeqsPs s
Teaes aAileGy Co ksslns for fepo2
and agent
complsint 70. e20. y 81, Frey e.
el. Ember VS., Western Union Tele-
graph Co asking Tor u sttiion
Complaint No 1875. 3 g. Waddine
ton ei an. Purcell IS ferroll and lex