The Birmingham age-herald., 1908-03-03
RECORD OF THE COURTS


 All divisions of the county courts set terday. The volume of business disposed of, however, was not large.
 In Judge Lanes division of the clrlait court judgment for $500 was rendered by consent In the case of James Forshee vs. Southern Railway company. The case Of G. F. Stanfield vs Birmingham Rail way, Light and Power company.
 Judge Coleman has the non-jury docket this week. He is engaged in hearing the case of McLester-VanHoose Grocery company vs. Pratt City Grocery company ct al.
 Tn the first division of the city court. Judge Ferguson presiding, the case of Norman Webb ct al. vs. Sloss-Sheffield Steel and Iron company is on trial.
 In the second division of the city court, Judge Nesmith presiding the case of Mrs. Rebecca Warshawsky ys. City Paper Company is being heard. Cases were dis posed of by Judge Nesmith yesterday as follows: William G, Lunsford ys. Br- mngham Railway. Light and Power company, judgment for $25; H. C. Gullege vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company. consent judgment for $500; Mrs. Annie Meeks vs. Louisville and Nashville railroad, judgment by consent for $50.
 In the third division of the city court, Judge Sharpe presiding, the case of Low rie vs. Bessemer Water Works company is on trial. Judge Sharpe organized the juries for the city court yesterday morn ing.
 The case of Joe Holley a negro charged with murder, was begun in the first division of the criminal court yesterday afternoon, Judge A. C. Howze presiding.
 Circuit Court Docket.
 Judge Coleman has the following non jury docket for disposition in the circuit court today:
 Fred Herrick vs. Michael Clifford. Dam ages Brand Brothers and company vs. Mrs. Mollie Didlake ct al. Assumpsit. Mamie Lee pro ami, vs. R. w. Baird. Assumpst NJ. E. Williams vs. B. w. May. Appeal by defendant. Joe Reynolds and company vs. pr. William Wilson. Appeal by defendant Burger Dry Goods company vs. Blaumer Brothers. Attach ment Coaldale Brick company vs. Frank F. Flemming Assumpsit Hoy Jolly Furniture company vs. c. B. Powell ct al Appeal by defendant. Hoy Jolly Furni- ture company vs. c. B. Powell. Appear by defendant. M. Wise vs. Mrs. M. E. Wilmot Appeal by defendant. J. F. Dedman vs. Crane Carriage company. Detinue. B. V. Brock vs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad company. Damages. Standard Fuel and Supply company vs. Gilreath Coal and Iron company AS sumpsit Doster Northington Drug com pany vs. Louisville and Nashville Rail road company Damages. William T. Kemper Elevator company Vs. Western Grain company. Assumpsit. Wood-Dick- erson Lumber company vs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad company. Damages. George Gates vs. St. Louis and Santa Fe Railroad company. Appeal by defendant. Pleas Dixon vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company. Damages. Rebecca Nelson vs. Southern Express company, Appeal by defendant. Alabama Brokerage company ys. Seaboard Air Line Railway company. Damages.
 In Judge Lanes division of the circuit court the following cases are set for trial today:
 Nick Caterinopolos vs. Traders National bank, assumpsit tspeciaD; T. H. Robin son. Jr., vs. Birmingham Southern Rail- road company, damages tspeciaD; Robert J. Krlmmnger vs. Charles T. Torbet. damages (speciaD; Rachel NJ. Chambers vs. Republic Iron and Steel company. damages tspeciaD; Homer Lindsay vs. Sloss Sheffield Steel and Iron company, damages (speciaD
 City Court Docket.
 Judge Ferguson presiding, the following cases are set for trial today in the first division of the city court:
 w. S. Patton, administrator etc. ct al vs. Southern Steel company ct al. damages; w., s. Patton, administrator, etc. ct, all vs. Southern Steel company ct al., damages; w. s. Patton. admins trator. etc., ct al. vs. Southern Steel company ct al, damages; w. S. Patton. administrator, etc, ct al vs. Southern Steel company ct al., damages; w. s. Pa.- ton, administrator. etc., ct al. vs. South ern .Steeli company ct al., damages; w