Emmons County record. [volume] (Williamsport, D.T. [i.e. N.D.]) 1884-current, 1908-12-17

Tho taking Of testimony In the futile
divorce case came to an end In Bis
marck last Friday. The case will b
argued BY the lawyers tomorrow, aud
the decision Of the court will he rem
dered later.
Persons Who heard the testimony
cay that there 10 no question as
to the result, q there Vas no evidence
Whatever to sustain the cruel and VIC
ious charges made BY Mrs. futile 1t
the solicitation Of G. A. HerOlz, Of
Linton, and aftsrward published In
Nj. Pstterson's paper, then printed
by the Advocate Ia hand bill form and
circulated 10 many Of the precincts Of
the Twenty sixth Senatorial District.
When the cross-exsmination Of Mrs.
futile was being conducted by MI.
Lawrence, Of the law firm Ut Bali,
Watson, Young & Lawrence, Of Far
60, she was asked whether she bore
any malice against her husband, or
whether she felt sorrow over the fact
that they we're opposing one another.
She said that she had no malice and
was filled with sorrow. Thsreupon
NJ. Lawrence produced the noted let.
tor which Mr.. Herols used At the pri-
mary election for the purpose Of draw.
Ing votes from Mr.. futile to himself,
"And you wrote this to Z newspaper
editor for publication 10 . newspa
per?" was the query. II did not. ,
vas the response. Then. came the
question. ITO whom did you writ<
tt?" Quickly came the reply, "Te
. Mr.. Herolz, Of Linton, North Da-
kota. who wrote to mo asking for It. J"
Following Is part Of 40 article Of
more than q column 10 length regard
ing the case taken from the Bismarck
Tribune Of last Saturday. The drst
paragraph appears Is big dIsplaJ
heading In the Tribune:
Il . Big Fight for Long Gresn-Stm-
mered Down, That IL About VIVA,
II Wanted BY Mrs. Tuttle-Shl
Contends That the Colonel IL Worth
. Million Dollars, All Told - III
Made Her . Seemingly Good Offer
Which Was Turned Down Sh,
Wants Z Divorce and More Thar
the ol4O, 600 He Offered Her.
The oral testimony In the case o
William p. futile, Of Dawson, vs.
Alice [llouisel futile, Of Chicago, va
finished ct On evening session Of thu
district court Friday.
Although the case Vas heard behlnt
closed doo1, enough has leaked out II
one way or another to put quietu
on the reports that have been circulat
Cd that there would be racy testimon!
that would scsndalize the communit
and create . sensation II 1t we're mad
public. Such u not the case.
The husband made no charge
against the wifs's character, but tes
titled that she made his home life 10
besrable bv constantly naggina hin
end accusing him Of I'll the crimes II
the catalogue, Ill Of which he at
tributes to groundless Jealousy. Their
we're qusrrels over their son. w. J
futile. who evidently had been spoile'
by both the parents. This cause fR
ured more 10 the trouble than woul'
| appear from the evidence, and Is IN
doubleday ct the bottom Of goo
deal Of the trouble between the sge'
couple.
Ia answer TO questions, Mr.. Tuttl
quoted Language Of Mrs. Tuttle's Of
J various occasions that Is not curren
In polite society 10 Chicsgo-or any
where else-which he charged 70 he
uncomfortable temper. The plaintiff
testimony showed that hs was yer
liberal 10 his expenditures for his wife
even during the period that their re
latIons were st1sined. but while the
we're living under the same IOoi