The Cecil Whig. [volume] (Elkton, Md.) 1841-current, 1908-01-25
GEORGE n. BLHFE,
Solicitor for the PIainfiff.
Order Of Publication
William Z. Bradfeld, Plaintiff.
VS..
ldcania \. Bradheld, Defendant.
In the Circuit Court for Cecil County
in Equity, No. 27so

The object OF this suit is 10 procure
a decree OF divorce yinculo matri-
monii of the plaintiff from the defend
ant. and for the awarding Of the guar
dianship and custody OF the children
OF the plaintiff and defendant, 10 the
plaintiff and Tor general relief
The bill states:--
I. That on or about the Goth lay ci
March, in the year 1870. the plaintiff
was married 10 the defendant whose
name was Idcauia \. Boyd. at The
town oi North East. in Cecil County,
in the State 81 Maryland, by Rev. f.
X. Miller at that place.
, bat since said marriage the plain
till. who was q locomotive fireman
and IS now An engineer. on the l'illa-
dclphia. Baltimore and Washington
Railroad. aud the defendant, have re-
sided in the States oi Narylan |. Della
ware and Pennsylvania. according to
the schedule OF the runs 81 the PLAN
tiff on said railroad and that the plain.
tiff has resided for more than two
wears nest preceding this Application
for divorce, at the town OF Herryyllc,
in Cecil County aforesaid and that the
defendant and the two children here Il
mentioned reside in the City OF WI
mington, in the State Of Delaware. or
elsewhere. beyond the jurisdiction Of
said Court
1. That ever since said marriage the
plaintiff has behaved hmscl. as a
chastc, faithful and aifcctioratc bus.
band towards his said wife.
/. That two children have been born
oi said marriage. one OF whom IS six
teen and the other fourteen "c1rs ~
age and both oi whom rs wcll as the
defendant, have been provided with a
home aud support by the plaintiff, "a
the time oi this application.
:. That for several years PRIOR to the
month OF March, in the year 1907, the
plaintiff was led TO suspect from the
conduct. language and assoc. ations II
the defendant. and from runrp~s which
reached him. that she Wa, untrue to
| him and had become an unchaste
| woman, but the plaintiff was avcrse &c
believing her guilty Of marital tn
iaithiuncSs and hoped that his su'pic'
ions. as well n said rumors. wer,
without foundation That IN the mont
Of March. in the year 1907, the plain
tiff. To his deep modification All re-
grct, discovered that his suspicious
were we'll founded and that the dc
icndaut had, since her said marrilg,
and within few years prior 10 slit
month OF March. 1907, committed
adultery (and so the plaintiff alleges,
in the City OF Wilmington aforesaid
where the plaintiff and his family re
sided.
&. That the plaintiff has not reside,
or cohabitcd with the defendant sine,
said discovery and has not hitherto
made application for divorce. hoping
that the defendant might be reclaimed
bnt OF this there is now no hope.
1t is thereupon this sixteenth day o
January, in the year 1908. ordered tina
the plaintiff, by causing a copy OF thi'
order to be inserted in some news
paper published in Cecil County afore
said. once in each OF four successive
weeks before the 10Th day OF Febru
airy. 1903, give notice to the said absen
defendant OF the object and substanc,
Of this bill, warning her to appear II
| this Court in person or by solicitor, OF
or before the cd day OF March next, &c
show cause, il any she has, why n dc
cree ought not TO pass as prayed.
MANLY DRENNEN, Clerk
True Copy-Tcst:
MANLY DRENNEN, Clerk
| Jan ~ Il