Waterbury evening Democrat., 1908-12-10

| against defeated candidate, tnef6- fore he may have been guilty of all the corrupt practices In creation but SO long as he was not elected he Is exempt from the consequences.
 The papers in this case were sign ed by Judge Bennett, and it Is said that tho judge to act with him is Judge Sllas A. Robinson and that his object in adiourning court yes terday was to confer with him in New Haven about selecting date to hold the investigation into the charges. Following is the full text Of the warrant:
 '1. That on November 8, 1908, an election was held in the state of Con- necticut 10 elect governor Of raid state, ana other state and federal of- iicers.
 "2. That on said day your poti- tioner vas a resident of the city of New Haven and q voter and electcr at such election.
 B. That George l.. Lilley of the city of Waterbury in said state was a candidate for the office of governor of the state of Connecticut at said election upon the republican ticket.
 4. That said George l.. Lilley re- ceived a majority of votes of the cleo tors of said state for the office of gov ernor and was apparently elected to said office.
 "5. That previous to said election the said George l.. Lilley appointed Isaac M. Ullman of New Haven in the state of Connecticut as his politi- cal agent and caused his name as such agent to be registered with the secretary of state at Hartford
 "6. That previous to and on the day of said election the said George l.. Lilley, through his political agent Isaac M. Ullman. made expenditures not authorized by and contrary to section ,, chapter 240, of the public acts of 1907.
 v. That said Ullman employed and paid more than seventy men to work at the polls in the city of New Haven at said election to distribute ballots and otherwise influence voters at said election, contrary to subdivision E. section ,, of the act referred to above, and that said Ull- man as political agent as aforesaid, did not pay them at the rate which ! is proper, reasonable and fairly com i mensurate with the services ren- i dered, but paid them at a high and 1 unreasonable rate.
 IS. That the said Lilley previous ! to and on said election day through sundry agents who were not his poit- ical agents, to wit Martin Parkinson and others, gave money to sundry ! saloon keepers in the city of Water l bury for the purpose of treating electors on the day of election and i previous thereto, and that said money left with said saloon keepers was eX- 1 pended for said purpose. and through other agents to your petitioner un- known left money with sundry other saloon keepers throughout the state for the same purpose and which was 1 likewise expended for said purpose
 ''9. That the said Lilley through sundry agents, viz: Clifford Els and others. left with sundry social clubs i'll said Waterbury, viz: South End Athletic club and others to your pe- l tioner unknown, money for the pur- pose of treating electors on or be- l fore said election day, for the pur- | pose of influencing their votes which ! money was expended for said pur- ! pose.
 '10. The said Lillcy, on the 1Glh day of November. 1908. filed with l hn .,c ported to be an itemized. sworn state mcnt setting forth in detail all the moneys contributed, expended or promised by him to aid and promote | his nomination and election, and for any other political purpose. pursuant | to section S of chapter 240 of the i public acts of 1907.
 II. That the said Lilley employed and paid money to sundry agents and persons throughout the state whose names do not appear in his sworn return of expenses.
 "12. That he employed certain 1 persons whose names are at present | to your petitioner unknown to go about the state and use their influ- ence at republican caucuses for the purpose of procuring the election of | delegates favorable to said Lilley to ! the republican state convention, which expenditures were made con- l trary to section of said act and not i for any of the purposes mentioned in said act and that the names of said agents do not appear in the sworn statement of expenses made by said Lilley or in the return of any of 1 his political agents
 1 "l3. That said Ullman, as political agent of said Lilley, filed on the l7th 1 day of November, 1908, what pur- ! ported to be an itemized sworn state ment with the secretary of the state Of the amount of money and property received from and promised by said Lilley and the amount of every eX. 1 penditure made or liability incurred and the names of the persons 10 whom such expenditures or promises were made, and the purposes for which said money or property was 1 expended or promised, pursuant to section of said act.
 IA. That said Ullman made cX- i penditures and employed agents, which expenditures and the names of which agents were not returned m said sworn statements made as politi- cal agent of said Lilley, pursuant to said act.
 "15. That the return of said Isaac NJ. Ullman as political agent of the said Lilley does not fully disclose the expenditures made by him as such political agent.
 "1k Neither the sworn statement