The Birmingham age-herald., 1908-02-17
RECORD OF THE COURTS

With a double-header capital docket in the first division of the criminal court, a heavy misdemeanor docket in the sec ond division of the criminal court and six divisions of the civil courts grinding, the present week promises to be busy one at the court house. With the excep- tion of the equity division of the city court. all divisions will be engaged in the disposition of regular set dockets In one section of the first division of the criminal court this week Judge Howze wilg preside and City Court Judge c. c. Nesmith will sit in the other. Judge Senn will in all probability take up Judge Nesmith's docket. No other irregularities are expected, as Judge Coleman will take up the regular docket in his division of the circuit court, and Judge Sharp will take his place in the third division of the city court. Judge Weaver will pre- side in the second division of the crim- inal court.
 Circuit Court Docket.
 In Judge Lane's division of the circuit court the following cases are set for trial today:
 Grover Jones pro ami vs. Birmingham Railway. Light and Power company. damages; Evelina Platt vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; Oliver P. Whitley vs. c. F. Manly damages; Charles M. Erwin vs. Western Union Telegraph company, dam- ages; J. M. Terry vs. Birmingham Rail- way, Light and Power company, dam- ages; Mary E. Dorman vs. Sloss-Sheffield Steel and Iron company, damages; Col .y.s & Company vs. w. J. Francis. as- sumpsit; Colonel Young vs. J. W. Wood, damages; John Herman vs. J. w. Grant, assumpst; John Pitts vs. J. M. Sims ct al, damages.
 In Judge Coleman's division of the cir cult court the following docket of cases is set for disposition:
 L. R. Gist, administrator, vs Kansas City, Memphis and Birmingham Railroad company, damages; E. F. Stollenwerck. administrator, vs. Southern Railway com- pany, damages; Oneal & Carson vs Ten nessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company, ct al. damages; J. E. Wallenhoupt, ad- ministrator, vs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad company, damages; Seals Piano company vs. J. M. Mullins, detinue; John N. Bechler vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company, damages; Louis Myers vs. L. Davis, damages J. l.. Gardner vs. The Sims Lumber company ct al., damages; The I. o. of U. B. or F. and S. of M. T. vs. Tom Stobert, dam ages; G. W. Ransom vs. Kansas City. Memphis and Birmingham Railroad com pany.
 Chancery Court Docket.
 In the ehancery court the following cases are set for hearing today:
 H. E. Klein vs Birmingham Belt Rail- road company; Roscoe Mcconnell vs. Bir- mingham Belt Railroad company; Charles H. Jernigan vs. Birmingham Belt Railroad company; William H. Merritt vs. Harry Coffin, trustee, ct al; P. Woolen vs. Alice Woolen; Steiner Bros. vs F. H. Kinney; James E. Sibley vs. Warrior Coal and Coke company; John Lacey vs. Lizzie Lacey; J. R. Vim vs. w. w. Garrett; John H. Wallace. trustee, vs. Charles D. Pantaza.
 City Court Docket.
 Judge ferguson presiding, the following cases are set for trial today in the first division of the city court:
 F. Lee vs. Southern Steel company, ap- peal by defendant; Edward Thompson company vs. F. W. Mccarthy. assump- sit; Eugene Foster vs. Bank of Ensley. appeal by defendant; G. w. Reeves vs. Nick Brooks, appeal by defendant; B. M. Covington vs. Birmingham Railway. Light and Power company. appeal by de- fendant; John W. Bennett vs. Helen s. Hudson, assumpsit Sam Miranda. etc., vs. Roussano Meranza Grocery company, apepal by defendant; Wood-Dickerson & Co., vs. Southern Railway company, as- sumpsit; Wod-Dickerson & Go. vs. Gen. tral of Georgia Railway company, as- sumpsit; Wod-Dickerson & Co. vs. Sea- board Air Line Railroad company. as- sumpzit; wood -Dickerson & co. VI. Louis