The Farmington times. (Farmington, St. Francois County, Mo.) 1905-1926, 1908-10-02
ROBBERY TO GO ON
REPUBLICANS HAVE NO IDEA OF
REDUCING TARIFF RATES.
That Plank in Platform Was Intended
to Deceive Voters is Proved by
ExuItation of the American
Economist.

All that was needed to prove that
the Republican tariff plank Is delu
| sion and snare as far as the tariff
reformers are concerned, was the com
mendation OF the American Economist
the high tariff organ. This II now has,
The Economist Is fairly jubilant over
the victory won In behalf of extreme
protection. The Republican party
1t says, lin national convention assem-.
bled. has declared anew for the policy
OF proteotion-protecti that shall be
adequate-and has rejected the de.
mands of the tariff agitators for re,
vision Of the tariff downwards. -
Which. of course, means that the party
has declared, either in favor of leav-
ing the tariff rs II is, or OF revising II
upward. We quote from the Econo.
mist, which, be 1t remembered is the
uncompromislng champion OF Dlngley.
ism:
The free traders and advocates OF
tariff revision downward will not find
a word or syllable in this tariff plank
that tends to furnish them the slight
est crumb of comfort. There is no
promise in the platform Of tariff re.
vision downward. After full
consideration Of the whole subject the
Republican party In convention assem-
bled did not declare for revision Of
the tariff downward. nor did II give
the slightest intimation that the belief
is entertained by the great body OF
Republicans throughout the land that
the tariff rates OF the Dingley law are
too high"
Even the maximum and minimum
tariff plan which Is advocated contem-
plates, according to the Economist,
making the present rates-or other
adequately protective rates"-the
minimum, and the imposition of still
higher rates to force fair treatment
from other nations. We do not often
find ourselves in agreement with the
Economist But It seems to us that
what 1t says about the amazing plank
adopted at Chicago is true. Every
one knows that there are hundreds of
thousands Of Republicans all over the
country demanding tariff revision In
the direction of lower rates. When
the convention met It knew just what
this demand was, Just what 1t meant.
1t knew that It could not be silent on
the tariff question, knew that 1t could
not refuse to pretend to promise a real
revision.
And yet this convention put itself on
record as fayoring sufficient protec-
ton to put our manufacturers abso-
lutely on level with those of other
lands. and then to give them "a rea-
sonable profit" besides. This can
mean nothing else than what the
Economist says II means. II is no
promise of revision downward. The
proposition is not to equalize condi.
lions here and abroad, not to make
up to our manufacturers the excess
Of the wages they are supposed to pay
over those abroad, not to help them
out In the matter Of raw material, but
after having done all these things. after
having removed every obstacle. and
taken off every handicap. we are to
tax ourselves to give the manufacture
ers-such rs the steel trust--"a rea-
sonable profit" SO It 10 great VIC
tory for the standpatters. The Econo-
mist is quite right For once Ii Ia
absolutely right. The party has
thrown itself into the arms of the
standpatters. Taking this plank in
with the refusal OF the con.
vention To demand publicity for cam
paign contributions. and also In con-
neetlon with the great activity Of the
agents OF the steel trust at Chicago, II
is hard to see how any tariff reformcr
can get much hope from tho tariff
plank of the Republican platform.
There Is less comfort than ever to be
got from 1t now that the American
besotted high tariff or.
gan. has commended It with such !
ioucsIing enthusiasm.