The Dickinson press., 1908-04-04
Miller Methods Cues
n toned

Miller Methods Cues
toned.
Attorney-Ge General McCue has addressed
a letter to- the Fargo-Fbfum. in which.he
explains his reasons for deciding to dis
pense with the services Of one Andrew
Miller. The letter is AZ follows:
Bismarck, N. D., Mar. 1910 the For
um:i MI. Andrew Miller, in his announce
ment and. through private correspon.;
dence. has given. il out that his removal.
from Office Of assistant attorney general
was brought about on account of his &C
tivity in the enforcement of the prohibi-
ton Law. This statement. is absolutely
false, for the reason that l turned over to
MI. Miller on August 10. 1907, the matter
Of the enforcement Of the prohibition
law. He accepted this work after taking
the mater under ADJUSTMENT, consulting
with Gov. Burke and other people of Bis
marck. Ny only instruction to Mr.. Mil
Ter was that he enforce the law in good
faith and as he foundFt on the statute
books. Had l not desired to enforce the
law, there certainly was no obligation on
my part~to appoint Mr.: Miller toathis par
ticular branch Of our work.
All Of the. correspondence in my office
and allie MY public ~uterances show that
l started to enforce the law fRforn the very
start and that l impressed the subject
forcibly upon all local officers, taking up
the matter at the time the temperance
commissioner law was held unconstitu-
tional with all the states attorneys. This
letter is a public document and a copy
of the same can be found in my Office at
any time.
CAUSE OF M1LLER's REMOVAL
l had the utmost faith in the integrity
of MI. Miller and no word Of criticism
was ever employed until the 9th day of
December. 1907, when ! took him to task
for signing a stipulation, a copy of which
l quote below. The stipulation, as will
be seen from its title, was: entered into in
an injunction case in Stark county.
-Four other similar stipulations were en-
tered into, the originals of which are with
the clerk of the district court Of Stark
county, and the other is in my possession.
This stipulation, to my mind, comprom-
ised the Office and gave ample cause for
.ae soou .a.s.. :. -. 49, ~ W q n.
1870 S !. was ~ nv Dy w.. ..:.,.F
9. 80 ~ na,as va as'asn.1 ".s'.;
~. Asy A..o.'suss a.'u .oy Daas
nss,us.'o.s s.'u " susu we. wy
~ ~; l. M III. ~. = my = S''o'..es sens !,
800. 80 1s' ~ 80 "o.
~ -. : ~ = .
k su.a. \. = ICY. a. =. ~
tAsi $3.50 W =.
4NSl : ss.s...s.G ~ 49, ~:
: msH ~. ,1.s !, ~ta!sn.sass 'na. ."e peDns :,
may y. Hpun =. uus ta.n ~msn 'esu'tee
sa = 81 WIS. .sIs z st4s.Asss nun '4e =.
ss'ss' IL , sssIst sshss nv Hssa1.aae ~ sen" 1he
s 6 SN.s 1 &: !. WI. .llSS s;;ssss'' - - ''.p1''
-. e.A. I t.'s ~
-s CONGRATULATIONS A.
Estate of North Dakota, County Of
Stark-1n District Court, Sixth Judicial
District, q
Estate, Of North Dakota, ex rel. z. F.
McCue, Attorney General for NORTH Da-
kota, plaintiff, VS.. Charles Nolan and, E.
]. Berry. defendants Stipulation.
~ hereby snPtss'ee aposa sreea py
anu between =. :. McCue ana Anurew
nl'i!el' ateolney genera atlu.asss'ait NJ
nc s.s. = - ,>ol'n D .s.sl a'tolneys lo'
Pla,n.ln, ana : =. e'mpson ana raw
TOTO, q burnett attorneys 1ol
.nat ,he court sna'i sustain tne "o:lon %
above entitled action and that the attor-
neys for the defendant agree in good
faith that said defendant shall not main
tain any nuisance on the premises in the
cororl,;n+ doecr;had dt,r;cr <hn ,oodor-