The Guthrie daily leader. [volume] (Guthrie, Okla.) 1893-1996, 1908-09-28


Heafst was then an msinccre. SELF
seeking demagognc' trying 10 deceive
What Change has come over him what.
sori or publication has he undergone.
what has he done so 10 elevate him.
self in ihe presidents esiimaton as
70 be considered sincere, self-sacri.
ficiug patriot. as he president must
now regard him. else he would not
quote him as authority
Bni Mr.. Roui IN bis Utica speech.
still expressing the sentiemnts of the
president continues.
Listen to what President Roosevelt
himself has said OF Mr. Hearst and his
Kind in President KOOsevelt's first
message 10 congress, speaking OF the
assassin of Mckinley. spoke Of him
as inflamed by the reckless utterances
of those who on the stump. IN public
press, appeal TO the dark, evil spirits
0f malice greed, envy. and sullen
lutred The wind Is sown by men
no preach such doctrine and they
an not escape their share OF the re
sponsibility for the @hirlwind that is
eaped lhs applies alike to the de-
iiberate demagogue. TO the exploiter
9f sensationalism. 10 the crude, fool.
sh visionary who. tor whatever rea-
son. Apologies for crime or excites
unless discomfort
Il say by the presidents authority,
n peunine These words with the hor
or OF President McKiuley's murder
resh before hiil he had AIR. Hearst
specifically in his mind.
And say. by his authority, that
,hat he thought OF Mr Hearst then.
THINKS Of Mr. Hearst now
The question naturally arises fol
,wing the presidents statement in
shich he takes MIR Hearst's delbera-
ions as his text does he think OF
Mr.. Hearst now as ne did two years
goe Daes he still think him a de
berale demagogue?" Does he still
eeard him as an "exploiter o sensa-
lonalsm?o apparently nos. for he
ccepts his charges without regard to
verify them. for Mr. Hearst is now at
empting to aid in the election of a
republican president
When the president apenned these
lords" did he have in mind the
orror of President McKinley's mur-
Ter fresh before him or only the as.
assination of character? VIII some
one "by his authority make answer?
And the presidents estimation nj
enator Foraker has apparently un-
ergone change is he not the same
enator Foraker who managed the
relindnary campaign In Ohio to The
lepuhlicau national convention iu
q0l. Is he NOT the same Senator For
ker who was accepted as the official
4. l..f lta iHA
White House early Ia the same year
vhen the late Senator Hanna was re-.
arded as PERSONA non grGta because
here were some Republicans who
anted him nominated for the presi-
lency2 Was il not The same Senator
oraker who brought Ohio into line
r Mr. Roosevelt and caused that
tate to be The first 80 declare Tor
lr Rooseyelts nomination? Was
iot that four years after this same
enaior Foraker had accepted s29,50O
rom the Standard OH company for
erylces? II Senator Forakefs gar
lents in zoos bear the stencil o.
tandard Oil sufficient for the presl'
lent to read him oui OF the Republic
n narty what was il that deadened
he presidents nostrils so that he
sOuld not defect the od0r IN laO4
ghen Senator Foraker was chosen
ilokesman?
Is not this Senator Foraker the same
senator Foraker who less tha n ter
lays ago participated in love feast
with Candidate Taft, and Il was de-
Jared by both that there never had
3een any differences or III feeling be
ween ihem2
Is he not the same Senator Foraker
r whom Mr. Taft wrote In the letter
published q few days ago Il do not
are for the presidency II & has 10
ome by compromise with Senator
9oraker?'
And is he not the same Senator
Foraker with whom Mr.. Taft did com
promise when they We're brought to
yether IN political conference and
senator Foraker was asked and con.
seuted 10 speak in behalf of Candi
date Taft2
VIII some ono "hy the authority
u some one else answer these ques.
lions?
--,-----