Devils Lake inter-ocean and Devils Lake free press. (Devils Lake, Ramsey County, N.D.) 1905-1909, 1908-06-19

E. J. Glass,
Asst. Observer Weather Bureau, in
charge Of station at Devils Lake N. D."
Train records furnished by Supt.
show that trains ran regu-
larly every day from the 25th to the
28th on the main line, from Lakota to
Devils Lake and also on the branch
from Lakota to Derrick.
Lakota Branch Record.
Monday, March 25th.
Passenger
:, Left Sarles 7:15 a. m. Il
Reached Lakota 1925 a. m.
Left Lakota sos p. m.
Reached Sarles 9:15 D. m.
Tuesday, March 26th.
Passenger
Left Sarles 7:15 a. IN.
$ Reached ,Lakota 1850 a. m.
Left Lakota $40 p. m, =.
d; Reached Sarles 9:3O p. m.
r., Wednesday, March 81.
Passenger --~
Left Sarles 7:15 a. m. r.. s.
Reached Lakota 11:00 a. m. ,..-
Left Lakota 5:10 p. IN. ,''-,
Reached sarles 1915 pm. 49,.
These are the official records and
can easily be verified 4 by any one.
Why has Judge Cowan misrepresented
these facts?AI leave 1T for every fair
minded; citizen of this district to an
swer.: ~ = a$ 5$ :, s@.2- -" -, = ~. >s<ss
Judge Cowan further attempted to
show that his record before the su.
preme court: was better than was
shown Il in these circulars In his
speech at Leeds he admitted that the
number of cases given In the circu
lar, forty-seyen, was correct. but claim
ed that he was affirmed in 20 of these
When forced to: admit that Of these
| At cases he was not affirmed in 20, he
lattempted to, show that six cases ap
pealed from his court had not beer
included in the list publishe i Il 4
The following are the 4 cases 4 he
claimed: * 81 . .f: .s 4sg: ,s3: 5sss s y
E i { State v. BeaVerstad, ~ ND. 527
Is,Hs52. State v.McLain; 13 N. p. 369.
State v. Ely, 113 NJ I'll, IN S. i !:
X These cases are habeas corpus case'
! and are actions instituted directly ii
1 the, supreme court. These are not ap
peals and Judge Cowan's friends ad
init that they are not. s :5s: s;s+ .ss ts
*sss; AS the basis upon which this circu
! lar was compiled, was appealss from
decisions, these cases cannot be IN
!; cluded for IL they we're, Judge CoWal
! would be getting credit fora class q
leases not credited to the other Judges
/ Barry VI TtuaK. 1sEE N. p. 13 81 sSs5.
/ This III q. certiorari case and like
wise original IN the supreme Court
#It is not an appeal for the same rea
son as the foregoing. .5s 81 #3s:: 81
52l S. zimme erman " MeC Curdy 1o6 ~
w. 1875. d. 5s:sg:t ID q
This is an appeal from a decision .
Judge Paldo'sG and Judge CoWan' sll1 !
Il name does not appear int. d:
s.:S:3 NeWyi1le II. Or. N. Ry= CO. 2 2 q a
N b. ~ d. i! IL 81 ;2s D .
This case is not an indep pendent cas- a, ls
4 4 but depend pom the case Johnso
4 GO. for which Judg
Il igoWan was given due credit I'M tf
ilcire,ilar No opinion was written cor
Il cerning this case and the record says
!! !.ssNo briefs were dled In this ease an
Hit was agreed by counsel II Il 5ope
Il court that the disp ition Of this cas-
q should Sbe governed bs the decisionsSi
the case sc johnson ~. RI Co.s5
@ compu uting the pereentage se
lother Judges they we're not giVenE cres
4 III for this class of cases, seqnentl
q Judg dge sowan d does not deserve cred
for them and he knows hs doesn'
4 ITIis tempt to bring these cases int
G This record shows 10 what desparaa
j str tits. .ha Ill put I'd cover nps s1nIs rseer
I I i'll the supreme court.
Let Irl cite ano instance
/. which fudge GoWan has atternp
Iraislead the votsra off this district 3
. Has repeatedly stated that out iof So !
ssorneya III ttas were sai
laaalla. q g
/ deli ffalseilsooa and sIutig stssosFa
wing II
have rl Toned these instances