The Birmingham age-herald., 1908-03-09
RECORD OF THE COURTS

 engaged this week in the trial of jury cases. A docket of criminal cases is also set for disposition by-Judge Coleman in the circuit court today. There Is no reg l u1arly set docket in the equity division l of the city court this week. Non-capital felonies will be heard in the first division Of the criminal court, Judge S.. L. Weav- CT presiding, while in the second division Judge Howze will hear misdemeanor cases.
 Circuit Court Docket.
 In Judge Lanes division of the circuit court the following civil cases, jury, are set for trial today:
 Clara Thurmond vs. J. T. Harwell, ap- l peal by defendant; Snug Isbell vs. Ten nessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company damages; NJ D. Alexander vs. Birmng- ham Water Works company; M. J. Sharp vs. Dr. George H. Stubbs ct al, dam l ages; Burt Bynum vs B. F. Lee, dam ages; Lena Snyder vs. J. T. Burton ct al., damages; Robert Jackson vs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad company, dam ages; Monarch Plumbing and Steam Heating company vs. Louis Arnsteln, 1p- | peal by plaintiff; w. T. Fitzgerald vs. i Western Union Telegraph company, dam- | ages; ". B. Morgan, administrator, vs. Republic Iron and Steel company, dam ages.
 The following evil cases are set for | trial today in Judge Coleman's division of the circuit court:
 l Collins & Co. vs. E. F. Logwood ct al, appeal by defendant; John Roach vs. Ala l bama Great Southern Railroad company, | damages; R. H. Hutchinson vs. w. K. | Cornish, damages; Hawkins Lumber com- pany vs Thomas Purvis ct al., assump- sit; Samuel Linn vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company, ejectment; Louis- vile and Nashville Railroad company vs. J. l. Massey, ejeetment: Frank J. Me- Namara ct al. vs. Jack Q. Cohen ct al, assumpsit; Frank W. Mosby vs Louisville and Nashville Railroad company, dam- ages; W K. Terry, administrator, vs. l Louisville and Nashville Railroad conn pany. damages; E. Housefeld, assignee, vs Age-Herald Publishing company as- sumpsit; John J. Bonner, administrator, vs. Sloss Iron and Steel company, dam ages: Thomas D. Roddy ct al. vs. Lew's- burg Coal and Coke company, damages; William Dwyer vs. Western Union Telc- graph company, damages; T. E. Partalh vs Louisville and Nashville Railroad com pany, damages; w J. Lowe vs. LoulsVliie and Nashville Railroad company, dam- ages; John W. Carnes vs. Franklin Brown Ore company, damages; Joseph G. Mar tin vs. Southern Railway company, dam ages: Preston B. Keith Shoe company vs. Rex Shoe company, assumpsit; Mrs. Lucy c. Moffet vs Louisville and Nashyiile Railroad company damages; Wood-Dics erson eompany vs Olin x Mendel, as- sumpsit; the Ohio Valley Shoe company vs. Rex Shoe company, assumpsit' r. N. Wadleigh vs. Rex Shoe company, as sumpsit J. F. McCary vs. E. J. Arnold x Co.,. assumpsit; John Crawford vs. Br-
 TatI damages; Joe Ann Rogers vs. Birm!ng- ham Railway, Light and Power company. damages; Elijah j. Lane vs Kan sas City, Memphis and Birming- ham Railroad company, damages; JaSe Rosenbaum vs. Sam Lefkovtz ct ai, dam ages; Rosenbaum Brothers Vs. sam Lefkovitz ct al., damages; c. H. Hud- son vs Charley Adams ct al.. damages' Marcus L. Marx vs. Kansas Clty, Mem" phis and Birmingham Railroad company damages; The A. Schmidt, Jr., & Brothers Wine O.. vs. The c. H. Schoolar Vine gar Co.,, assumpsit; R. S. Bailey vs. Birmingham Southern Railroad com many. damages: Mrs. Margaret Allen vs E. A. Wilson, damages; E. F. Del Bondio vs. M. c. Screws, assumpsit; Walter Zuransky vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company, damages; G. R. Horsley vs. D. M Horsley. ap- peal by defendant; l.. w. Johns vs. Walter Hoffman ct al assumpsit; J. l.. Addington ys. Southern Railway com pany, damages; Walter Robertson vs. Gordon Britton. assumpsit; Mrs. J. E. Lyme vs. Emil Klank, alias Tom Grif- fin assumpsit
 The following criminal cases are set for hearing by Judge Coleman in the circuit court today
 The State vs. Will Burlong, bastardy: The State vs. Henry Lightsey, appea! by defendant; The State vs James Hud- son, bastardy; The State vs. Ed Allen, bastardy; The State vs. Garfield Foster. bastardy; The State vs. John T. Reed. -; The Town of Avondale vs. Henry Mitchell, appeal by defendant; Mayor and Aldermen of Woodlawn ys. E. H. Knight, appeal by defendant; Town of Sandusky vs. W. P. McCarty, appeal by defendant Town of Pratt City vs. Elm ma Sullivan, affrays The State vs. Julius Johnson and Mary Wilbournc, Oscar w. Mahlke, appeal by defend ant The City of Woodlawn vs. W. F. Carter, appeal by defendant.
 chancery Court Docket.
 In the chancery court the following cases reset for hearing today:
 Carrie Tupper ct al. vs W. A. Cooper ct all, G. B. Edwards vs. Mary Scfuggs, Pharo Brothers vs. Birmingham Rail- way Light and Power company ct al., Alice Thomas vs. John Thomas Susie herrill vs. John H. Sherrill R. B. Montgomery vs. c. R. Mower ct all, Jane Lawshee vs. Robert Law ee, Josetta Strong vs. Charlie Strong Wade Wilson vs. Laura Wilson, James A. Allen vs. Henry Seigel, A. H. Hunt ct als. vs. A. O. Fruitticher, Josephine Evans ct al. vs Spencer Phillips.
 City Court Docket.
 Judge Ferguson presiding, the fol- lowing cases are set for hearing in the first division of the city court today: H. C. Malone vs. c. A. Howze, dam ages; c. B. Ebersole vs. Standard Grocery company ct als., damages l.. E. Hayes ct als. vs. Motlow Distillery company, assumpsit Julie E. Taylor vs. Singer Manufacturing company, damage o. c. Brake vs. John Roberts, ejectment; Harvey Moss vs. William Johnson, assumpsit; P. w. Shields vs. Cooney B. Ratliff ct als., assumpsit; W. H. Bernard vs. J. w Alexander, damages Mrs. M B. Terrell vs. Nat T. Overall, assumpsit; William A. Hunt vs. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance company, damages; William A. Hunt vs R. c. Milliken ct al., damages; w. T. Newberry vs. A. T. Newell, as- sumpsit.
 In the second division of the city court. Judge Nesmith presiding. the following cases are set for trial today:
 r1n moi uG