The Cecil Whig., 1908-01-18
GEORGE n. BLHFE.
Solicitor for the Plaintiff.
Order Capitalization
William z. Brad6eld, Plaintiff.
VS..
ldcania A. Bradheld. Defendant.
n the Circuit Court for Cecil County
in Equity, No. 27so.

The object of this suit is to procure
n decree Of divorce a yinculo matri-
monii Of the plaintiff from the defend
ant, and Tor the awarding Of the guar
dianship and custody OF the children
OF the plaintiff and defendant, to the
plaintiff and for general relief.
The bill states:--
I. That on or about the goth day of
March, in the year ISoe, the plaintiff
was married 20 the defendant whose
name was ldeana A. Boyd, ut The
town oi North East. in Cecil County,
in the State 81 Maryland. by Rev T.
X. Miller - that place.
2 That since said marriage. your
orator who was q locomotive fireman
and is now m engineer. 0n the Phila-
delphia Baltimore and Washington
Railroad. and the defendant, have re-
sided in the States Of Marylanl. Della
ware and Pennsylvania, according To
the schedule of the runs ~ the plain-
tiff on said railroad, and that the PLAIN
tiff has resided for more than twoI
wears next preceding this application
for divorce, al the town ~ perryyilly
in Cecil County Aforesaid and that III
defendant and the two children herd
mentioned reside in the City oi W.
mineton. N the State of Delaware. ~
elsewhere. beyond the jurisdiction y
said Court /,
3 That ever since said marriage the
plaintiff has behaved himself as a
chaste, faithful and afeetionetc hus-
band towards h:s said wife
!. That two children have hccn born
Of said marriage. one Of whom IS six
teen and the other icurte n ears ~
age and both of whom rs well as the
defendant have tccn provided with
home and support b, the plaintiff, TO
the time ~ thi> application.
s That for several years prior o the
month of March in the year 1907. the
plaintiff was led TO suspect from the
conduct. language and associations Il
the defendant. aud from ruur,-S which
reached him that she was untrue TO
him and had become m unchaste
woman, but the plaintiff was avcrse to
believing her guilty 81 marital un
faithfulness ard hoped that b.; suspic-
ions. as well as said rumors. were
without foundation That in the month
Of March. in the year 1907, the plain
tiff. to his deep modification an re.
grct. discovered that his suspicious
were we'll founded and that the de-
iendant had, since her said marriage
and within a few years prior to said
month OF March, 1907, committed
adultery (and so the plaintiff rllcgcs)
in the City oi Wilmington aforesaid,
where the plaintiff and his family re-
sided.
6. That the plaintiff has not resided
or cohahitcd with the defendant since
said discovery and has not hitherto
made application for divorce. hoping
that the defendant, might be reclaimed
but OF this there Is now no hope
II is thereupon this sixteenth day OF
JANUARY. in the year 1903, ordered that
the plaintiff. by causing a copy OF this
order to he inserted in some news
paper published in Cecil County afore-
said. once in each ~ four successive
| weeks before the 10Th day OF Febru-
arv. 1908. pivc NOTICE 20 the said absent
defendant ii the ohjcc, and substance
nf this bill warming her TO appear In
| this Court IN neTson or hv solicitor. on
or before the cd day OF March next, TO
show cause. II any she has why de-
cree OUGHT not to PASS rs prayed
MANLY DRENNEN. Clerk
| True Conv--Test:
! MANLY DRENNEN. Clerk.