The Robesonian. [volume] (Lumberton, N.C.) 1870-current, 1908-04-06

acEion should not be- dismissed
from the docket. Same in case
of J. c. McCaskin vs.. S, rhen
and GEE. McNair.
B. f. Mclean ct al rs. NJ #.
Millsaps ct al. non-suit ordered
and plaintiff taxed with cost.
NJ. A. Buie VS.. Wm. owe, re-
ferred to F.. J. Britt t. :ak4 ard
state account.
A. H Mcleod vs.. Vi. F. Phil
Ups ct ais MyL.aI and .t@Lesh
SIthdraw as counsel and notice
to employ new counsel and plain
tiff to die com plant or action will
be dismissed.
The following cases were con
inned:
w. H. Thomas vs.. Naxtnr
Bldg & Loan As>o.; Malichi
Locklear vs.. Biddie Lncklear; J
J. Shaw VS.. NJ A. Buie; NJ. A.
Pate aud wife vs.. Richar,l Car
t ar and wife; W. O. Edmund VS..
Town of Lum berton; W. g. Pow
ell VS.. Raleigh & Charleston Ry :;
| j. A. Fisher vs.. Matte Coving-
ton; D. N. Britt VS.. McDiGrmid
Williams Lumber Co NJ. A. Baie
VS.. A =. L. Rg.; J. E. Jacobs
vs.. A. &. l. Ry; 7. L. HuSsy VS..
} Sarah Ann Hussey; McIver &
Co VS.. A. G. l.. Ry; Willis
Locklear ct ais. vs.. J. j. ! tanks
Ell ais; Eald we'll & Carlyle VS.. O.
G. McGoogan; Southern Ion &
Equipment Ca. vs. L. Z Coffin, :
= ham; United jewelers. Mfg
= Go. VS.. Fl. B. Ward; Adams
Grain & Provision Co VS.. A. c..
L. Rv.; LATHE Powell VS.. Car. G.
Ry.
Judgments were issued in the
. following cases:
San J. Smith VS.. r. T. Draug-
!. ham; McAllister Hdw. Co, VS..
|, Emm Redmond; R. F. DeVane
o VS. Geo. H. Hall; Caldwell & Car.
9 lyle VS.. Evander Nc Millao; w. S
Cobb ct al. VS.. Atlantic Coas'
E, Line Ry. VIM. B. Locklear ct a
e VS. Eldridge Barton eJ al; A. D
Mckenzie VS.. A. G L. Ry.; E. n
J. Monroe ct al VS. J. w. Afford g
20 al; G. P. Stephens and wife VS. J
It D. Mclean & Co. ; the McKinnel
70 Co. VS. A. G. L Ry.; O. c. Fall
n Us. J. B. Smith; S. Sanderson e
III al vs. G.. F. Sanderson ct al; w. ]
Butler VS. Addie L Butler; R, R
n Barnes VS. Med. Walters an,
p Floretta Walters; R. r. Barne
e vs. Evander Annette; Cald
Carlyle VS. Mollie Fl. Sampso
}. ct ais; Thomas Blue and wife V
to Simon Buie ct al; S. R. Town
Sc send VS. R Nd. Nimocks; R. Z
De Bi rnes VS. E. Moo Surles; No
lie @. Floyd eft al. VS. Alva Parke
s. ct al; W. @. Hamer and wife v
J, F. Mcfarland ct al; Lumber
/. ton Imp. Co. VS. Board of Con
missioners of Robson county
ID w. Graham VS. J. G. Thomas
of W. J. Matthews VS. Mutual RI
8 serve Fund Life Asso.; ]. A
n, Branch vs. T, r. Tolar; E
G. Paul VS. w. R. McGill; Caldwe
it & Carlyle VS. T. J. Johnson ct a
Maxton Mercantile Co. VS. Wad
r, Lecklear; The Armtield Co. '
n G. M. Townsend, trading a
Raynham Mercantile Co.; Jne
$. Leach vs. Jesse Scott ct al; coul
al ty or Robson VS. COttinghal
Mt Lumber Co; Henry B. Bethun
l. VS. Sarah Bethune; McKinnol
Currie Co, and Brown Sha
C. Lum Der Co. VS. William and c,
to lin Stubbs; M. A. Buie VS. Wn
Love; Cornelia Pitman and ott
C. ers VS. A. G. L. Ry. Co.; H. 7
,e- Parham VS. G. G. Ry.; PERI
rt Campbell VS. E P. Slocumb & G,
is and others; J. T. McRae VS.
". Walker ct al; Simpson Con
,s. putting Scales Co. VS. J. R. Nc
,rt Cormick N. ]. Thompson '
80 Troy Siugletary ct ais; W. Mct
IF. Monroe ct ais. VS. w. r. Musse
y. white and others;O. G Dees 7
Wesley Billiard ; E. E. Page '
6 W. A Smith.
In case of Frank Cough VS. E.
-, cher Sinclair, an action for Il
,f recovery of certainrealestate v
\ 4. Humphrey clerk Of tn
court was appointed receiver.
ial The Indiana Republica
State convention on the 2
j. adopted platform, endorse
er Vice Presidents Charles Wal
IN rem Fairbanks and instructe
the thirty State delegates to tt