The Washington herald. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1906-1939, 1908-03-17
DAILY COURT RECORD
tMonday Marc 1905,
lMonday, March 10. 1oos.l


Supreme Court Of the United States.
Present. The Chief Justice Mr.. Justice Harlan
Mr. Justice Brewer. Mr. Justice White. Mr. Justice
PeckhAm. Mr.. Justice McKenna. ar Justice Holmes.
Mr.. Justice DAY. and Mr.. Justice Moody.
Allan NJ. Johnson Of New YORK City, Frederick
H. Whitfield Of Portland Greg Edward IN
gsrud. Of Fargo. \. Oak; William b. Rose. Of LIN
eoln Nebr.. and Frank L Mccoy. Of Omaha. Nebr-.
No. is7. Amour Packing Company petitioner. Va
The United States:
No. 4ss. Swift & Co. petitioner. vs. The United
States;
No sss. Morris Co. petitioner. Us. The United
States;
No 40. Cudahy Packing Company, Petitioner. IS.
The United States: and
No So The Chicago, Burlington and QuincS
RailwaT Company. petitioner. The United States.
On writs Of certiJran 20 the United States Cir
chit Court Of Appeals for the Eighth circuit
Judgments affirmed and causes Temanded 70 the
District Court Of the United States for the West
Day Dissenting. Mr.. Justice Brewer. Mr.. Chief
Justice Fuller. and Mr.. Justice Peckhsm. tMr.
Justice Moody took no part IN the decision OF
these casesl
No. lOs Dona Maria Francisco OTReilly de Camera
Countess Of Buena Vista. plaintiff IN errors " John
r. Brooke. major general United States Army. In
error 20 the District CosIr1 OF the United States
for the Southern district Of New York Juds-
ment affirmed with costs Opinion by Mr. Justice
Holmes
No. IA Jesse Koyt smith. appellant, Is. WIN
lam J. Rainey e. al Appeal from the Supreme Court
Of the Territory Of Arizona Decree reversed. With
COSTS and rem4nded with direction 10 reverse
the decree Of the District Court and remand the
cause 10 that court with direction to override the
demurrer Opinion by Mr. Justice Holmes
The Chief Justice announced that the court viii
take a recess from MONDAY. March g 10 Monday.
April next The Chief Justice also announced the
following ort5ers Of the court:
No. 4 original Commonwealth Of Virginia. COM
piainant, state ~ West Virginia; set down for
oral argument the pending application for the ap
poinImeut of master. on Monday. April $, after
the cases already assigned for that day
No. all Miguel TuDna 81 al plaintiff ETor.
la ComDania GenrAle de Tohaoos de Fiiiptnas.
lotion 70 dismiss postponed 20 ths hearing On the
~ rits.
ex rel Abraham Kope plaintiff in error IS Theo-
dore Bingham, pclioe commissioner. &c. Motion 20
advance granted and assigned FOR argument
on the hrst Tuesday Of the next term October u.
after the cases already set down for that day
No C6. Scruggs. NsnderyOort and Barney DRY
Goods Company. petitioner The United States
petition for writ q ccrtiora6 the Unii4d States
Circuit Court q Appeals for the Elgh-h district
denied
No 81 The Roderiek Loan-sanufaotaring Com
Pauy. plaintiff in error. Rembsrt Kueiling. In
error q tue SUPREME Cont q the State o. New
York Per CuTiam: WIT Of error dismissed for
the want ~ jurisdiction kansas City Fort Scott
and Memphis Railroad Company Daugherty. Is
states. 40. Mcdonnell jordan. rs United States
-; Pennsylvania Company vs.. Bender, rs United
States. 25; IN Pennsylvania Company. Isl United
states. Isl; Wilson "a North Carolina l6s United
States. So So
40. les Richard Il. Field e ux plaintiffs n
cTTUF rs. The Barber Asphalt Paving Company
C al In error % the kansas City Couu Of Ap-
reals Of the State q Missouri. Per oIriaus WIT
q dismissed Tor the want q Jurisdiction, Mis-
sosif Kansas ad Texas Railway Company vs.. Elliott
49, United States $50: SayWard - Denny. 80
United States 80: Cochran Oh and Development
Company VI. Amandet ls9 United States. ls2;
Life Inslrance Company ~ McCireU. lss United
States. 81. CITY and County u san Francisoo vs..
Itseu. Is Uuited States. G.
OTder-Ths reporter haTing represented thar owing
70 tie number Of decisions a. the present tine Il
O'Clock. Is. therefore. now here ordered that he
publish an additional volume IN this year pursuant
70 section 81 q the Revised Statutes.
No 80 Edgar =, He-senrich. trustee, petitioner.
y. Carrie ". Haley Petition for wit Of Ger
tiorau 70 the United States Cir6uit Court Of Ap-
peals Tor the sixth circuit. submitted ~ Mr. BeT-
nard h. Selling the petitioner. and by Mr.. Ale1an-
der J. Groesbeck for the respondent
No. 665 Hatcher q Moore Lumber Company
q al petitioners. rs William Il knight et al
Petition for VII q certioTan % the United States
CirCIit Court Of Appeals for the Flfih Circuit sub
mitted b. Mr. A. T. Pun FOR the petitioners with
leave 70 hie an additional bef for petitioners with
N ten days
No. "a The Western Union Telegraph Com
fany. plaintiff IN CrT0r. The State q Kansas
rel c. c. Coleman attorney general: and
no 81 Tie Pullman CCmpany. plaintiff II
error. The State 81 Kansas rel C. 4. Cole
man. attorney general Motion 70 advance sub
miited by Mr. s s Ashhaugh in behalf Of ooSIn-
SCI Tor the DEFENDANTS IN error In support q no
ton and hy Mr.. W. H RossngtOn for the plain
tiff in both CASES. ard hy Mr.. John 2. Dillon Mr..
Rush Tagsert NJ George II. Fearons. and Mr.. H.
u. EstahTook IN No ia
No. 20. osbern II. Wilson. plaintiff II error. vs.
Erie Railroad Company e al. Motion 10 dismiss
submitted b. Mr. Frederick s. Tyler IN behalf o.
Mr. William T. Gushing for the defendants II error
No. GIG. Frederick Lang. plaintiff IN error. vs.
The state Of New Jersey. Motion 70 advance sub
mItted By Mr.. George Beuiine for the defendant
ia error.
NJ. --. Original TX narte; Il the matter q
The Perth Anhoy Dry Deck Company. petitioner
Motion for leave 20 hle petition for wit Of pro
hibition submitted by Mr. James d. Deven. T..
Tor the petitioner
No. rs EEpire State Cattle Company e al