The Detroit times. [volume] (Detroit, Mich.) 1903-1920, 1908-04-24
The hazslton Case Is One Where
The Times Favors Divorce as
The Organ Of the Oppressed
and Of Peace.


do you take this woman tor better or Tor worse
the present obligation doesn't fail u.s. but
startling divorces granted in our local courts alone IN
s calls for its amendment and suggests .nas
&srsad: "Do YOU TAKE HIM OR HER FOR BETTER OK
|DIvoRCE7" with the -interrogatve form justified
lust now the Harelton divorce the meiight in
Detroit
It a. college romance Ann Arbor having
Ic6 the prelmnaries
Things appear to have gone along swinngy until the day
3chafng dish.
From that time on testimony which the public is devour
ngt would 60 show the dove OF peace couldnt
roosng place in the Hazeon home with search
It would seem slight the substitution OF
lsppe,sne for alcohol in view of
s and not beverage. could easily have been passed by
appealed FIRST to Mr. Hazetons sense OF huor
compel his observation that she had ruined the ehafng
And while this was very thing really started the
breach things will that finally brought this couple into
divorce their differences with their woyearod child
- spectator
The bone of contention home at last
be the subject religion Hazeon regard for being
Tar more pronounced than that Of her husband
Haxeon charges, in the suit he has brought that
incompatabity of view he compelled to
tendency Mrs Hazelton for exhaustive
ong prayers breakfast table and sit with bowed head
v one eve ON the cakes getting cold had finished
The "men" found Hazeon. rule considerably
rufHed and the beefsteak shrivelled
e on Mrs husband that game was
perntted to progress with anything like peace for him nor
pleasant evening for whomsoever his guest might be-
Card games husband insofar the inter
ectons Of Mrs assumed the proportions
angh sng with Mrs Hazeon continuing to voice ner
nroests in bed at various intervals during the night
r1apeon was compelled to do the his
lite and Mrs doineered her hus
nd generally they living together according 20 the
Auzbsnd's story.
be11a1 in
4s nit places the somewhat different light
toes these people should have
d On the other hand really supports the view that ney
like many Others too hasy; that they did not KNOW
eh the fact adds to the argument that divorce too
Ieosy acquired dangerous the promise OF what its ultimate
}edfocx will upon society.
n6ra Hazeton's analysis the frannes
with sharp and her effort to correct
disposition which herself to be possessed
6 spproaches pathetic She still processes love for her hus
band which plainly hold for her. They probably
could never live happily together again.
Dispositions of this husband and wife
nu,ever roof without display OF
willingness concede point And in this
cssevws great mistake will make she
ans wife domineer the husband that
ho family going be relegated for good to the
Kitchen. where the woman belongs in any household
The wife properly advise and her counsel will
~ souet by husband, the spirit of will
long commands particularly where he qualified for
fhat 81 himself.
on the other hand 1t is not the province
fes religious is he in duty bound to
<orm the ideas Of the wife along this line
~ the husband finds enjoyment in of cards and
Of discerning
villa pasme of cards also with the orbearance
ht may be forced exercise In listening long
table the suppcaon just be heard
en< up from kitchen other of the house
The Times for couple
t1uge K fsvors divorce.
we move thar the Hazetons be separated for the
oppose warps for the United States navy
1[rcxuameut
W. oppose warshps disarmament
Icunniy IA general