The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1908-12-03

and found that they all assumed some
thing TO begin with. The nebular by
pOthesis. for instance. assumes that
matter and force existed. matter in
particles infinitely fine and each par
ticle separated from every other par
ticle by space infinitely great. Begin
ming with this assumption. force work
ing on matter, according to this by
pOthesis, creates a universe Well.
have a right to assume and | prefer
to assume a Designer back of the de-
sign, a Creator back of creation. and,
no matter how long you draw out the
process of creation, so long as Gcd
stands back of it you cannot shake
my faith in Jehovah. In Genesis 1t is
written that in the beginning God
created the heavens and the earth, and
I can stand on that proposition until |
find some theory of creation that goes
further back than 1.-The beginning"
l do not carry the doctrine of evo-
luton as far as some do. l have not
yet been able TO convince myself that
man is a lineal descendant of the low
err animals. | do not mean to find fault
with you If you want to accept it, All
| mean to say is that while you may
trace your ancestry back to the mon
key if you find pleasure or pride in do
ing so. you shall not connect me with
your family tree without more evil
dence than has vet been produced. 1t
is true that man in some physical
qualities resembles the beast. but man
has mind as we'll as a body and a
soul as well as a mind The mind is
greater than the body. and the soul is
greater than the mind, and l object to
having mans pedigree traced on one
third of him only, and that the lowest
third.
One does not escape from mystery,
however, by accepting this theory. for
It does not explain the origin of life
When the follower of Darwin has
traced the germ of life back to the
lowest form in which it appears. and
to follow him one must exercise more
faith than religion calls for, he finds
that scientists differ. Some believe
that the first germ of life came from
another planet, and others hold that it
was the result of spontaneous genera
ton.
If l were compelled to accept one of
these theories, l would prefer the first,
for if we can chase the germ of life
off this planet and get it out into space
we can guess the rest of the way and
no one can contradict us. but if we ac-
cept the doctrine of spontaneous gen
GRAFTON we cannot explain why sponta-
neOus generation ceased to act after
the first germ was created.
Go back as far as we may. we can
not escape from the creative act, and
it is just as easy for me to believe that
God created man as he is as to believe
that millions of years ago he created
a germ of life and endowed it with
power to develop into all that We see
today. But | object to the Darwinian
theory until more conclusive proof is
produced. because | fear we shall lose
the consciousness of Gods presence in
our daily life if we must assume that
through all the aces no spiritual force
has touched the life of man or shaped
the destiny Of nations. But there is
another objection The Darwiuian the
DRY represents man as reaching his
present perfection by the operation Of
the law Of hate-the merciless law by
which the strong crowd out and kin
off the weak. If this is the law of our
1py.a1 thar, If l.. IL ,rft..