Arizona republican., 1908-12-03

uments had been left anonymously al
 his residence during the month oi
 September, 1907. De Sagan offered
 to prove, with the cooperation of his
 wife, that the count had arranged
 through two women, called Madame
 'G'' and Madame R." to have these
 documents shown to Mime. Gould al
 her country residence. De Sagan
 while not directly accusing the count
 of forgery. offered to prove by ex- perts that these documents were forg- ed by the same hand"
 When Miss Gould was married to de Castellane she had q yearly in- come of $700,000. During her mar ried life, with what the counsel char acteriZed as it's countless folies," the sum of $1O,0OO,00 had been spent
 When she got her divorce from the count there existed debts amounting to $3,400,00 in addition to the sum of $95,000 that had been given to the Marquis and Marquise de Castellane
 This is the man." cried NJ. Gle menceau, who wants his children ed ucated like a de Castellane; a man without profession, who married for money and then devoted himself to betraying his wife with his wife's female friends"
 NJ. Clemenceau gave the exact terms of the settlement his client offered to make at the time of her divorce. These the count refused on the ground that they were insufficient, and. in so doing, said counsel, he proved himself eligible for the insane asylum. These terms were $200, 900 cash and an income of S30.000 a year. the income to be increased when of the hands of the trustee, and take over all debts pending.
 NJ. Clemenceau railed at the count for representing de Sagan with hay ing two mistresses. The count" he said. had more than two when he married Miss Gould"
 Reverting to the divorce proceedings M. Clemenceau charged that the words of the decree obtained by the countess, that "her husband had en- tertained relations with women of easy morals did not constitute the worst charge against the count. As proof that the suit was brought be- cause of the counts solictude for his and that the Marquise de Castellane did not desire their GUS tody, NJ. Clemenceau called attention to the fact that the Marquise had not come forward as a party to the ac- ton.
 NJ. Clemenceau took up one by one the accusations against the princess by the count regarding her travels in Italy with de Sagan before their mar riage. IL should be remembered, the lawyer declared, that the princess was not a young girl travelling with her fiance, but a divorced woman in the of the man she was going to marry. Furthermore, she is an NJ. Clemenceau sad. and conduct that would appear to be out 1f the ordinary in France is perfectly proper on the other side of the ocean,"
 Dismissing the charges brought against the prince and Mime Gould while they were in New York, NJ came to the more serious ,harge of misconduct at Versailles He admitted that de Sagan had stepped out of Mme. Gould's window n the Hotel des Reserverar at II o'clock in the morning but he pointed ut that this was not the window of Ter bedroom, but of her salon, and IS the salon was situated on the ground floor of the hotel it was quite natural for the prince to emerge into he garden by the way of a tall win low that in French houses often erves as a door. He called attention O the fact that counsel for the count lad insinuated that de Sagan con lucted himself improperly at Yer allies Such intimation was infam- usly false, and it was likewise untrue hat de Sagan had occupied a room n the Chateau Marais on the same loor as that of Mme. Gould's ser ants. It is true de Sagan rented a l fila at Bellevue under an assumed ame. but this was something he ad a perfect right to do.
 When NJ Clemenceau finished it 7as announced that the case would Q over to December 9, when M i umier will speak for de Sagan and ! I. Rousse for George Gould. the | rustee of his sisters estate, a party ! o the suit.