The Mathews journal. (Mathews C.H. [Court House]) 1903-1937, 1908-02-13

-NOm LUX OlCy.-Witllam j. Bryan
brought all his invective into play
10 tell what he thinks of the New
York. Stock Exchange and to de-
nounce lawyers who stand behind
corporations who violate the law and
tell them how to do it with safety"
Addressing the Civic Forum, in
Carnegie Hall. he praised President
Roosevelt, and described the Clear
ing House certificates issued through
out the country to relieve the money
strIngency as ~no-cent dollars"
He branded the Stock Exchange as
worse than Monte Carlo. He declared
It's members use loaded dice and prac-
tice every form OF gambling and
swindling known. He asserted that
the Exchange turned out more en-
bezzlers than Fagin's school turned
out thieves, and wound up his denun-
citation by the utterance:
IL is mystery to me why the
eighty million people of this country
90 not rise in heir indignation and
arrive these gamblers into honesty or
out OF the country"
Cheers that reverberated for two
minutes through the auditorium
greeted this sentiment. and they were
followed by thunderous outbursts
when Mr.. Bryan attacked the monop--
Gusts who reap rewards by cornering
the necessities of life"
1t is time" he said, that the
masks OF responsibility be torn from
these monopolies, and they be re-
veaied in all their ugliness and ghast-
Illness"
The subject assigned to Mr.. Bryan
was Thou Shalt Not Steal" and he
talked on the topic for two hours.
Mr.. Bryan's Address.
Mr.. Bryan said in part:
To steal or to commit larceny
may be defined as the wrongful TAX
ing or another's property. Law
writer's have divided larceny into two
classes-petit larceny and grand lar
ceny-tho former term being used
when the property stolen is of little
value, and the latter when the value
is greater There is a tendency in
modern times to divide grand larceny
into two classes, so that now we are
inclined TO think of larceny as petit
larceny, grand larceny and glorious
larceny. BY glorious larceny / do not
REFER to the policy which nations
nave INDUCED in of taking the prop
erty of other nations by force-an act
that is sometimes described as not
only innocent, but even patriotic; /
discernible at the present day. to re-
gard stealing upon n large scale rs
less reprehensible than stealing uuon
small scale. If a man picks your
pocket, or enters your house in the
dark, or accosts you upon the high
way and takes from you a few dol
lars, you regard him as a vulgar
tnlef. No one can have RESPECT for
such person. aud the punishments
or the law are in such cases swift
and sure, If the offender is caught.
Even in the case of grand larceny.
II the amount taken is not very great
the thief finds it difficult to escape
for he has no influential friends and
ne cannot hire skillful lawyers to
present technicalities in his defense.
If, however, he steals a large sum
1t becomes quite a different matter
and the sum may be so large that we
overlook the mans rascality in our
amazement at the genius which he
mas displayed. AS a rule, the man
VINO steals million dollars has q
better chance of escape than the man
VINO steals a thousand. So true is
this that 1t has been suggested that
we amend the Commandment to read
Thou shalt not steal on a small
scale We should attempt to cuIti-
waite a public opinion which will re-
move the distinction between grand
larceny and glorious larceny and in
sure the enforcement of tn criminal
law against all offenders alike, re-
CARELESS OF the amount stolen and
regardless OF the social. business or
political position of the thief"
Mr.. RTyan's peroration was devoted
to the Stock Exchange.