The Hawaiian gazette., 1908-12-01


Der %, 1905. ........... .s25o.1s
A. M. Brown, September. /, 1906. $1,000
Jas. l.. Holt, Tax Assessor,
March %, 1907. 262.66
II. t. Mills, October 8, 1908. - $500
w. A. Purdyg March 10, 1907. 174.25
Tucker & Kenyon, June 90, 1908 1877
M. McInerny, June 90, 1908. 80. 6i.39
w. G. Parke, December s, 1903. 5S3.10
w, c. Parke, April le, 1904. ~. 23s.75
II, May 4 Co., January Q, 1904. 1926
c, f. HerrEk Carriage Co., Ltd.
1904 Observation-Disclosures. 10000
That said Judgments in favor or H
II, Mills, Tucker & Kenyon, C. F. Her
rick Carriage Co., Ltd. and II. May &
Co. are still unpaid and unsatisfied
That as to all of the other of said
judgments they have been paid solely
through garnisheeing a portion of the
salary of the said John w. Cathcart, as
County Attorney.
That said judgments are based ON
long standing accounts, number of
them consisting of judgments based on
prior Judgments, for example the said
Judgments in favor of said w. G. Parke
were satisfied on March 9, 1908; the
on one for $5S2.l0 having remained un-
satisfied from December 8, 1908, and
the one for $23S.75 having remained
unsatisfied from April 12, 1904.
In addition to the foregoing, MS de-
ponent is informed and verify believes,
there is suit now pending in one OF
the courts of this Territory against the
said plaintiff whereby is sought to be
recovered the sum of one hundred and
twenty-five dollars ($125.O0) loaned by
Carl Smith of Hilo, which it is alleged
said plaintiff borrowed from said Smith
many years ago while he was acting as
Deputy Attorney General.
| That deponent has made inquiries
among the business people of Honolulu
with whom the plaintiff is well ac-
quainted and on information received
from such source states that said plain
tiff is a man of no financial standing in
the business community of Honolulu.
That deponent has inquired from per
sons whose business it is to run and
operate financial agency in Homo
lulu and from such source has ascer-
tanned that the plaintiff in this action
is rated as man of no financial stand
ing and person to whom credit could
not safely be given.
That attached hereto and made a
part hereof are examined and compared
copies of the judgments in his aft
davit hereinbefore referred to and
executions returned unsatisfed by the
High Sheriff of the Territory of Ha-
wall.
That the sworn complaint of II. G.
Middleditch, Trustee in bankruptcy OF
Chas. F. Herrick Carriage Company,
Limited VS.. John w. Cathcart, ct al,
| IL, H.
First Judicial Circuit of this Territory.
alleges that said John W. Cathcart has
purchased certain property in Honolulu
and partially paid for the same with
his own money, and that said property
has been placed in the name of the
wife of said plaintiff to the end that
the same might not be attached by the
creditors. of said plaintiff. A copy of
| the sworn complaint in said case here
inbefore referred to being hereto at
/ tached and made a part hereof.
That plaintiff, for. the two years last
past has been the County Attorney for
| the County of Oahu at salary equal
to that which he will receive as Attor-
ney for the City and County of Homo
lulu for the coming two years.
(S.) LORRIN A. THURSTON.
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this eth day of November, A. D. 1908.
(Seal) (S.) VIC. WELDON,
| Notary Public, First Judicial Circuit,
Territory of Hawai-. 49,.
Bicknels Affidayit.
| The following is the affidavit of Au.
ditor Bicknell except as to the title
of the case and of the affidavit.
James Bicknell being first duly
sworn, deposes and says that he is now
and for more than one year last past
has been the duly elected, qualified,
commissioned and acting Auditor of the
County of Oahu, Territory of Hawaii,
and, as such Auditor aforesaid, has
been and is named as Garnshee-in
his official capacity as said Auditor
in the herein and following entitled
actions, the said actions being brought
in the District Court of Honolulu,
County of Oahu, said Territory.
| ]. w. A. Purdy, Plaintiff, VS.. John
| w. Cathcart, Defendants; James BiclS-
nell, Auditor of the County of Oahu,
Garnishee. Judgment for Plaintiff for
$174.25.
2. NJ McIprrny, Plaintiff, VS.. John
W. Cathcart Defendants; James Bick-
| nell, as Auditor County of Oahu, Gar
nishee. Judgment for Plaintiff for
| $64.39.
8. Tucker & Kenyon, Plaintiff, VS.. J.
w. Cathcart, Defendant; James Bick-
nell, as Auditor of the County of Oahu,
| Garnishee. Judgment for Plaintiff for
$76.77.
4. Harry Il. Mills. Plaintiff, VS.. John
w. Cathcart, Defendant; lanes Bick
nell, as Auditor of the County If Oahu,
Garnishee. Judgment for Plaintiff for
| $255.o0.
and that AfIiant, as said Auditor, has
| been duly served with Notice and Ger
tifcate of each of said Judgments, as
| hereinbefore set out, of the said Dis
trict Court of Honolulu, as awarded
and recorded, in said Court, as against
said John w. Cathcart named in said
actions, and each Of them, as Defend
ant therein, and that the amounts set
forth heroinabove and opposite the
said entitled actions and each of them,