The watchman and southron. [volume] (Sumter, S.C.) 1881-1930, 1908-06-24

Inpo From s1o Party Which Has
(sossa TAN end sherman ~ STAN
3nra-Bearcrs.
: y 1Ancoln. Neb.. Jhne 2i.--Following
- his expression Of yesterday In crit
ep1sm Of the Republican national plat
0ssm IN general. VIM. y. Bryan gave
rHnlght statement in which he as
.ooGs In particular the anti-injupction
onsak Of the Chicago declaration.
~nnrscssrisins Il N - transparent
1sauds" The statement follows:
Tho snti-injunction plank Of the
0eDublican platform ~ finally adopt
- = . transparent fraud. 1t is pos
st1o>s that the members of the COM
u1ksse we're buncoed by some trust
DuUysrs--that is the only charitable
Z Ucaw that can be taken Of IT, Those
~ advocated the plank claimed to
- ooing II - . concession to the
voes sarnsrs. and yet II one will read
- plank no will zee that Il IL In fact
- announcement that the Republi-
~na party IL unaiterably opposed to
- laborins mans position. The
Dosak reads a follows:
= The Republican party will up
nelA ~ al timss the authority and In
,oourlty Of the courts. state and Feder-
- ana ever Insist that ti,eir power to
en1pscs their Pre- eases and protect
~. liberty and property shall be pre-
osFvsd inviolate. We believe. how
Gjsr. that the rules OF procedure in
Dsasral Courts with respect to the L.
= nnnnss Of Z, writ Of injunction should
- more accurately defined by the
9n.futs: that no injunction or tempo
Suy or reseraining orders should be
1u,osd without notices except where
1vlsparabls injury would result from
~ dsley. IN which case speedy
1sssing thereafter should be grant
-;
ne win bs seen that the planks be-
- with IN unnscsssary suiogy Of
- courts. Nobody b opposed TO up
1so11ng q ali times the suthority and
one6oS1(y Of the co,,rts. Nobody II OBJ
1Dp11ng 70 the enforcement Of the pro-
oorsss ef ths courts OF 10 their sxer-
o. Of their powers 70 protect life,
1870 ana property. The plank a.
Genss nat somsbody u attacking the
Gsus<s ana that the courts are in dam
- ef lssans support or Of having
G1ooy powers weakened. There h no
4Gnnnek upon the courts and there n no
<DnsQht anyvhsrs Of interfering with
-onV legitimate function Of the courts.
~ Republican convention puts mp
- nan of straw and then proceeds to
o.nelish IL rhis part Of the plank
vD1D written % give assurance
- shs psopss. who are opposed to the
1nDsring mans plea. And let us pro-
esse 70 that part Of the plank. which
~ intended - sop to the laboring
man. u says; We believe. however.
- ths rules Of procedure in the Fed
- Court with respect to the
1nDnancs Of . writ Of injunction should
- uaors accurately denned by the
,lootnts.' (Just what that dennition
>i~Asn ~ b not stately
That no injunction or temporary
ssseraining order should be issued.
W1ehont notice, except where irreparae
- injury would result from delay. in
~hich case . speedy hearing there
neR1r should be granted Note the
Ueed except where irreparable injury
WoeId result from delay and compare
1A1s exception with the federal statute
- the subject and you will and that
DnAsr the Law - II now exists the
Uourt n not empowered to grant .
1n0porary restraining order except
wAsrs there appears to be danger OF
& 1ss0parsbie injury from delay. Il
Wsu bs seen that the man who wrote
- Injunction plank copied the stat
80 almost word for word and made
- exception as broad ~ was the
on1uts. II the convention had been
fSBnnk In the statement Of its position
= would have quoted the present stat
- and said thet II was in favor of en-
1sscinG the lac just a. II IL. II would
1--we said that ~ the present court or
3oAes may grant q temporary re-
Dexsining order ~ there appears to be
io.nser Of irreparabis injury from
: os1ay.' Therefore, be Il resolved, we
-srs opposed 70 changing II.
The men who are responsible for