Saturday news. (Watertown, S.D.) 19??-19??, 1908-11-13
Circuit Court
in Session


lis over the sale of machinery,
which is said to be defective. and
4 the bank has brot suit on a breach
of warranty.
Michael Mailer ct al VS. J. b.
Mclaughlin. Mailer is seeking
to hold Mclaughlin for certain
liabilities Of his father. 5000 is in.
volved.
j. E. Dore VS. c. M. Parrot and
j. M. Parrot. This is controv-
ersy over an old, small one.
| One Of the interesting cases Of
! the session will be the case Of the
Nichols Shepherd Go. VS. S. III.
Addison, S. B. Sheldon, ]. Hors-
tad and M. L. Smith. Messrs. Adj
]dison and Sheldon went security
on an appeal to the supreme court.
thinking that5the bond only went
lgood for the costs Of the action.
Later it developed that the bond
held them for the judgment. They
are seeking to get free from the
Judgment which is over So, 900.
F. f. Bates VS. M. Adams. A
dispute over an account rendered
! for painting house. Amount
involved is small.
N. A. Wing VS. Frank Finley.
Dispute over commissions on land
sales. Amount involved a little
over $500.
] The city has two cases against it
as q result Of giving permission to
/ the st. Louis railroad to dig a deep
cut thru on two streets. Giese
4 and Fl Olson are suing for iam-
1 ages on this account.
Blocker & Hurlburt VS. j. j. Bal
.|lou. Plaintiffs sue for small
threshing bill.
Ole L. Christianson VS. H. A.
LOOMS. Dispute over three notes,
involving $500.
I'll. st. Clair VS. j. II. Peterson.
4 This case involves about 5000, being
along standing account between the
persons. 1t includes a board bill,
and many other minor affairs.
The Security National bank VS.
MARY Neitert. Suit on q note.
. John Koehler vs. Mary Radtke.
i A dispute over $3.50, commission on
4 the sale Of land.
Jacob Summerfeld VS. |. Solomon
Go. Mr.. Summerfeldis seeking
payment for services alleged to
have been rendered the company as
a travelling salesman. The case in
wolves about 500.
School district No 2 VS. Henry
Wolf ct al. This is a dispute over
4 1.-THE ownership Of 4 few books. The
lschool board claimes them. while
1.-THE literary society is alleging
4 that it bought and paid for them.
4 G. i. Wage VS. d. ii. Miller,
I'M. r. Baskerville and Job Tren-
holm. Suit to recover for five
stacks Of barley which were burned
4 during this last fall. The defen-
dants claim that they went into the
field with a threshing rig upon the
urgent demand of the plaintiff, and
a that the burning Of the grain was
almost assured, because Of the high
wind.
Miss 3. Z. Crosby vs. Oscar
.Isyaux. This case has been tried be-
4 fore, but new trial was granted
\ at chambers session It is dis
|pute over commission on the sale Of
property.
John Steinocher VS. Arthur Red
lime al. This is a case Of q neigh
lborhood quarrel Suit IS brot for
Isl 900.
limo Flint vs. 81. 4. Sheldon, ex-
Iecutor Of the Flint estate. This
lis 9 case Of claims against the es-
4 tate.
S. Jennie Sorg ct al VS. G. Tut
hill As dispute over an old &C
a count.
G. Al. Doner VS. Frank e. Korth.
IA case to settle q contract price for
i a house, It is expected that this
4 case will be settled before trial.
F. 3. Harrington vs. Dakota Gem
4 trial Telephone company. "A dis
4 pute over telephone rates. Small
amount involved and is appealed
i from justice court
G. Kile VS.. NJ. T DeWooay.
j Al suit to settle commissions on IN