The Washburn times. [volume] (Washburn, Wis.) 1896-1976, 1908-09-24
IOURNEYIHG IN
LAND Of DREAMS
Impracticable Democratic PROPOSE
ton for Trust Control.
Convincing Exposition of Fallacy OF
Bryan's Panacea for Solving
Problems Of Modern
Business.
(F'rom Gov. Hughes Youngstown

(From Gov Hughes Youngstown
speech.)
When we consider remedies that are
proposed for the trusts, we lind our
selves 1ourneying in land of dreams.
Again the magician of 1896 waves his
wand. At stroke difficulties dfsap-
pear and the complex problems or mod
ern business are forgotten in the fas-
cination of the simple panacea. And,
as the free coinage of silver in the
ratio of Is to / was to destroy the
curse of gold, so the new found specific
Of equal perfection is to remove the
curse of industrial oppression. The de-
fusion of 1908 is comparable only to
that Of twelve years ago
The first suggestion is that the law
should prevent a duplication of di-
rectors among competing corporations.
However advisable it may be to have
independent directOrates of competing
CORPORATIONS. it would seem still more
important to have independent stock
holders, for a majority of the stock
holders of a corporation choose the oil
rectOrs. If a law were passed pre-
venting the duplication of directors it
would easily be evaded in the selection
of men who would represent the same
interests. The most ordinary eXper-
fence shows that it is not necessary to
serve on a board of directors in order
to control it's proceedings. Whatever
the advantage of such law as is pro
posed, it hardly rises to the dignity of
a remedy" or vindicates its title to
place in an imposing scheme of reform
outlined in national platform.
But the more important proposal is
"that any manufacturing or trading
corporation enga ged in interstate COM
merce shall be required to take out
federal license before it shall be per-
mitted to control as much as 25 per
cent of the product in which it deals"
A license is permission, and the object
of the remedy is not to regulate large
businesses, but to destroy trusts Hence
the supposed efficiency of the plan is to
be found in the prohibition of the coll
troll by any such corporation ''of more
than so per cent of the total amount Of
any product consumed in the United
States" This is another delusion Of
ratio.
1t might be interesting to inquire
what is the meaning of 'any product
consumed in the United States Does
1t refer to a class of commodities?
And, If So how shall the classes be de-
fined? Or does it refer to each sepa-
rate article Of commerce? And, if so,
what account does this proposal take
of the skill and initiative of manufac-
turers who have built. up more or
less exclusive trade in particular ar
t1cles, often protected by trademarks,
although in most active competition
with other articles designed for the
same general purpose and seeking the
same market! In desire to correct
the evils of business are we to place
an embargo upon honest endeavor
whose activities present none of the
abuses requiring remedies? And if
found to be adequate and just if we
lay down our prohibition in terms of
volume or ratio of business and not in
terms of right and wrong? If we
adopt Mr.. Bryan's proposal, to what De
Rod Of production is the prohibition
to apply? Is the excess for day OF
for a month to be considered? Or is
the average production for year to be
taken? And what system shall be de
vised by which suitable Information
may be furnished in the nature of dan
ger signals along the routes of trade
so that the manufacturer may know
when he is about to exceed the pre-
scribed ratio? He may justly be re-
quired to govern his own conduct. but
how shall he be apprised of the con-
duct of others upon which is to depend
his guilt or innocence?
The patent laws confer true
monopoly in the exclusive right to man
ufacture and sell. Are these laws TO
be repealed because a private mon
opOly is indefensible and intolerable?"
Bryan's Crude REASONING
An example OF Mr.. Bryan's reason
ing is found in his statement that
''when a corporation controls so per
cent of the total product it supplies
forty millions of people with that prod
uct." There are, of course, specialties
which have limited market and are
used by a relatively small number of
the people of the United States More
than so per cent and indeed even as
much as 100 per cent of the trade i'm
such articles may be in the control
of particular corporation. This may,
in fact, be relatively small corpora
ton. 1t may never have aspired to the
unSavory renown of trust" But by
prosecuting it's particular line with
fidelity and meeting satisfactorily
limited want; or by reason of some
secret processes or advantage of expert
ence, 1t may control the trade in a Civ
en- article of commerce. Or, suppose a
concern controls the whole trade in
some useful byproduct which it has
found 1t advantageous to make, is the
trade to be prohibited?
The Democratic platform makes no