The Guthrie daily leader. [volume] (Guthrie, Okla.) 1893-1996, 1908-10-13
DOCKET
Of TIL:
CORPORA
TON COM
MISSION

In sending Out doclte;s Of the Cor
poraiion commission. Chairman Love
says:
Ny Dear Sir: lnclosed YOU will find
a copy OF the docket of the Corpora.
Ton commission. for the term begin.
ming October 20, 1908.
On investigation you VIII note tha.
Proposed Order No 80. and Proposed
] Order No - are set for hearing Oc.
toGer 20. 1908, and that Proposed Or.
/ defs Nos 30 and 30 are set for Mon.
day October 26. 1908
This is TO notify YOU that The com.
+ mission will on Tuesday October 20.
! 1908, continue the hearing of Pro
posed Orders Nos SO ard 50 until
Monday October 20. 1905 for the rea.
son that this will require representa-.
tives of all OF the railroad companies
TO be present only on one day
The commission thought best TO no.
iily you IN advance in order that yol
might govcvn Yourself accordingly.
Yours very truly.
}. e. LOVE,
Chairman
Tuesday, October 90 J08.
Proposed Order No. 33-Tarlff on
hides.
Proposed Order No. Addition 10
Order 30 80.
Complairi so. 225 w. r. Utter.
back, Duraut VS. ST. Louis 4 san
Francisco Railroad Co. Additional
passenger train facilities
Complaint 30 2l2-I T. Hinkle, ct
AL Manitou. VS. ST. Louis q san
Francisco Railroad Co. Enlarge stock
pens
Complaint No. 2ii-J. C.. Lang. Sec.
retary Dacoma, vs.. ST. Louis X San
Francisco Rallroad Co. Asking for
sidctrack
Complaint 40. 2i5 d. G.. Brewer.
ri al. Luther VS.. ST. Louis n San
Francisco Ualroad CO Asking for
better drainage
Complaint 40. 2iG-D. c. Brewer,
Iuther, vs. ST. Louis 4 san Francisco
Railroad 90 Asking for crossing
"Wednesday October q, 1903,
Complaint No. in3 w !. llaslins
1T ri, Icrrcrsou vs. Chicago. Rock Is
land a Pacific Railway Co Asking
ior rcucr drainage
Complaint 30 230 w. l.. Crisp ct
al, Nnnekah. VS. Chicago Rock ls-
land 4 Pacific Railway Co. Asking
for night agent and trains stop an
night
Complaint No. 23S--P /, Bishop,
Mayer Genry. VS. Chicago. Rock Is
land & Pacific Railway Co. Asking
for three street crossings.
Complaint No 253-union Industrial
Railway Co.. Aline, VS. Chicago, ROCK
Island & Pacific Railway Co Pays'-
cal connection and transfer and
switching facilities
Complaint 30. 247-F r. cav ford
II al.. Greenfield vs. Chicago, Rock
island q Pacific Railway Co. Asking
'or an agent who Is au o3e r3tur
Complaint No. 2i9-Anau1rN2 Nuli-
ng CO.. Anadarko. VS. Cni'-eA Rock
Island & Pacific Railway Go. Asfins
Ger q s. sdeul lck
Con,plaint 40. $50 W } Candnl ct
a.. Lone Wolf VS. Chicago, Rock Is
land & Pacific Railway Co. Askins
for station ana facilities between Ho'
lart and Lone Wolf.
Thursday, October 22, 1908,
Complaint No 214-W, p. Harl-
wick Guthrie US, Atchison, Topeka q
Santa Fe Railway Co. Asking for bet
Ter draiuage
Complain; 30. 2l7-G. a. White ct
al. Fargo. vs.. Atchison. Topeka 4
santa Fc Railway Co Asking for .
lepot and night agent
Complaint No. 2S9 Seyerns & Bow
man. Guthrie. Us Aiehison, Topeka 4
Santa Fe Railway Co. Asking Tor
s'derack 10 handle sand
Complaint 40. 2i3--W. G. High ct
al. Maysyllc. VS.. Gulf, Colorado X
Santa Fc Railway Go. Asking that
barrow pits be filed
Complaint No 22O r. w Frey 60
a.. Amber. vs.. Western Union Tc,c-
yraph so Asking for station.
Complaint 40 2ei-l g. Prescott
ct al Frederick vs Western Union
Telegraph Go Asking for uptown OF.
flee
Complaint No. ii9 n d. Cox, ct al
Hobart vs.. Kansas CITY Mexico *