The Salt Lake tribune. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1890-current, 1908-11-15

- QtlluOiiN iNN'
i r. 'dh church law books. books
y sne Mosiah IL. Ether an,
E@ of February g.. 1881,
AI.,rlbs AI'snb !, Liverpool edi'
SasSTwUa Twakes God a change.
stlea Alma lima 1873. Reyela-
VI II,s,Sl. James l:I1.
di iiSoisely claims to have
,i ! law or order. while
q1,o 1T,,astrine and Covenants
p .p"ur.oramic pu. principle was
y aIIUS tbo beginning. Reye- \ e
y Us ISL, paragraphs 2-3.
vi, iTJa,lachi o:l4-15.
y / justides concahinage nnait;ma1e
sbieh thing is po1sIltlvelS
i''th = tho Book Of NS1n",, Mormon
therein it says; 'Ooncu
IA 'Is1 bsvs none. .,..o,. y e.
~. y That tbat he would have
Xii + II positive terms six
Times and Seasons, vol
~ 1 Is called the l'New
T. > Covenant while the
ino and Covenants, reve-
s.oSor oS 0s, 1882, paragraph
I'll Of Mormon the "New
7. ird as the revelation was
4 ron i by the issuing of the
ls.' L., not proven everlasting.
Il eoutradicts the Book
h : iustifying David and
TIcs;sifes that which turns
n rsn away from God: ia.
Deuteronomy l7:17. First
I, .hs Scriptures do not
,sd those who sought to
7 thtm wero rebukcd and
y, did not correctly inter
iSvures used in justifying
|rSs.6. This rebuke should
mag to lstter-day polyga-
II doing the very same
s 10 the years 1880 and
aid that nothing would
"a tsst was contrary to the
tls and Covenants, and
a time embraced the mono
4 Revelation of September,
-aph 1; February 8, 1881,
L. before this revelation
4 hs Book of Mormon and
|rl Covenants contained the
|rr, doctrine of the trinity.
Ek Nay, 1929, paragraph IS.
|Eil 1916.
Es verse !, wherein il says
:llsd of the Lord concern
Vi, contradicts the state
ssh the martyr (Times and
|sa.e 8, page 1851, wherein
" be- never inquired of the
sfrial revelations concern
B Already revealed, and the
yoken several times upon
previously.
1lR il says that God COM
|iabin 10 take Hagar for
" the Scriptures show that
seid him. through Sarah,
b out Biblical history is
1 asy rule or command by
|iu vas regarded as a wife,
y presented by Sarah as a
lld not as a wife. The
q ihe only Que who consid-
"a wife, while tho Lord calls
/ hoadwoman. - .lGenesis
ttet Sarah Genesis :l0).
tlls her % Sarah s maid
~. and Abraham in speak
ll ca Is her 'tthy maid
|AS). From Genesis llth TO
%, Sarah is called the wife
e iEenty'two times, while
|'hPters call Hagar a wife
nd that only by the his
|1s's The revelation within
E'5as polygamy, in that it
@ the works Of Abraham
vac OF which was the put,
y Hagar, the bondwoman.
!luls should hearken unto
sMis likewise and putting
; Sordwomen.
Z sax it frequently contra.
Is e close observation of
= o., Z aud 80, and / and
'.eS =. The last verse says that
Ny reveal more concerning
80 lee next word received
soptlng II was a nullilca.
e'aifesto.
n.:s Brigham Young was
~Itg nor ordained 10 occu-
zea position be claims TO
sash the revelation was
I, gso because the one an.
3, ordained to succeed the
sIa ;aid revelation.
, e the Observance Of this
y IIsas !. , upon the chastity Of
n . therefore not justified.
,'s y, it vas an established
~ al revelations should
n 10y Oy certain quorums and
'Sr 10 the church in
n, ,,sI. OsIlore being accepted as
\ ,,sa saie WAS violated and il
,,s%lted rightly. Minen.
u. w ya,o, 10, page 29e. Times
'V'ume 0, page Cos; also
,ss',ttss ~ The original marriage
|ii,r,ssaa py Joseph the mar
syra w, by ey the church. in
B l.v | g repealed by the early
/ IA ttSSareh claiming legal
isjsuo therefore, binds ever
\ rip,;rt',ple ;,tpe succession to the
IS Inconsistent to be.