The Washington herald., 1908-05-06
DISTRICT COURTS.
Court OF Appeals.

Present: All
Admissions; Carl A. Richmond and James Mac
Dermott Sheridan.
Easter 7s Ralston. trustee; Adams Monroe Manu-
featuring Company ct al Us. Macfsrland ct al .
Davis ys United States, and United States Us. Wal
ters passed.
No. 1855. New York Continental Jewell Filtration
Company vs.. kar, motion TO strike out bill Of ex-
eeptions and dismiss appeal, submitted by Mr. II.
p Gstley Of counsel for appellee IN support Of mo-
ti0n. and by Mr. J. II. Hayden in opposition there
to- motion postponed until hearing On its
merits argument commenced by AE j. ID. Hayden
for appellant continued by Dir. II. L. Galley for
appellee. concluded by Nr. ]. h, HAYDEN for appel
Iant on motion appellant Is allowed TO hie reply
brief herein. if 50 advised. Attorneys, J. H. Hay
den-Maddox K Gatley.
No 1919 Isrten IS. Loehier ct al: judgment re-
yersed. Opinion by SIR. Chief Justice Shepard. At
toneys L. A. Bailey-Leon Tobriner.
No. H9l., Russell Washington Post Company;
judgment reversed. Opinion.>ay MT. Justice hobo
Attorneys. Wilson & Barksdale-Chapiu Brown, {.
A. Douglas, and J. Z. Earnest.
No 1873. Smith vs.. Roz; judgment affirmed opan-
ion by Mr. Justice Van Orsdesl. Attorneys, John
Rid0ut-J. J. Darlington and c. L. Frsiley.
No. 1881. Central National Bank vs. National
Metropolitan Bank. judgment affirmed. Opinion By
Mr. Chief Justice Shepard. Attorneys Brandenburg
and j. B. LarneF.
No. 1913 Blatcher vs. Philadelphia, Baltimore and
Washington Rai.. = Company; Judgment reversed,
Opinion hy Mr. Justice RoBb; Air. Justice Van oTs-
deI dissenting Attorneys. J. 3. Mangan and j. b.
Horigan-F. D. MeKenney, ]. s. FianneTy, William
Hitz and g. b. Craighii
Ne. 1896 STANDARD Oil Company vs. Brown; judg-
ment affirmed. Opinion by NF. Justice Van Orsdeil
Attlmeys, j. J. Darlington and A. l. Sinclair
c. n Fulton J. ". Cox, and ". G. Gardiner
No. 1855. Macfarland ct al vs.. United States ex
Fel. Russell; Judgment affirmed. Opinion hy Mr.
Chief Justice Shepard. Attorneys. (. II. Thomas
and T. T. Stephens-Lambert & Mclean and Z. d.
Yeatman.
fnsd. Opinion by Mr. Justice Robb. Attorneys,
Wilson & BaFksdale-R. A. Ford, Barnard & John
son. and W ID. Mclean.
No. 1857. United States ex rel. Male rs Hoover
ct al Judgment affirmed. Opinion By MT. Justice
Van 0rsdell. Attorneys, Cuttings Chambsrlin-
Stuart AlcNamara.
No ISL CARRIED IS United States ex rel. Cart
ford judgment reversed. Opinion by Mr. Chief JUS
tce Shepard. Attorneys. T. F. Best and g. W.
Wociruf-W. L. Ford aud ". E. Coleman.
Patent appeals:
No. l72 Kinsmsn vs. Knitner; affirmed. Opinion
b. SIR. Justice Robb Attorneys, c. s. Champion
aud J. F, Heaerman-s. T. Fisher and Ernest VII
kinsoa.
No. SIS. Gutter vs. Leonard; affirmed Opinion by
Mr. Justice Robb Attorneys. J. r. Edison and
W c. Jones-C. Y. Edwards.
No. 468 Goldman IS Hobart affirmed. Opinion
by 3ir Justice Van orsIlell- Attorneys, Marcellus
Bailey and P ". Page-ATthm Y. Brlsen.
No. f9 American Stove Company Ts Detroit
Store Works et al affirmed. Opinion by Air. jus
tics Rob5
80. ls8 Barstow Stove Company vs. Same; az
frned. Opinion b. SIR. Justice Robb. Attorneys,
II. M. Low, II. L. Clarke, and J. ". Mundsll-
E. ". Vail, Thomas E. Robertson, and s. R.
Bets.
No. 1850 MHler-shoemaker Real Estate Company
vs.. Sturgeon; affirmed. Opinion by Mr.. Justice Van
ClrsFaIl A+frrravz 7 FFergft and p "
Ewing Hayden johnson
No. 1890 HYDE. &c, IS. SoutheTn Railway Com
psny; argument commenced by Mr. H. Il Classic
for appellant, continued by Mr. J. W Yerkes for sp-
peIlee concluded by Mr. II. Il Classic for appel
iant. AttnTneys. Il. Il. Glassis-Hamilt0n. COl6eTt.
Ycrkes Hamilton
No 1855 Garfield vs. United States ex rel Turner
ct al Judgment reversed. Opinion by Mr.. Justice
Van OTsdell. Attorneys. E. 7. Sanford and ". r.
HarT-Kappler q MerillaL
No 1858 District Of Columbia vs.. DeWslt; iudg-
meBt reversed. Opinion hy Mr.. Justice Robb. At
torneyS L 4 Thomas-J- T. McNalley and Edwin
Forest
Assignments for today;
No. 1881. District Of Columbia et al rs. Black
man; on hearing. Attorneys, T. II. Thomas, d. z.
Blair and T. P. MeyeS-W. Z. Lester.
Special calendar;
No. II. Benson 3 Palmer. Attorney. A. A.
BiFney
No. Is speir ct al vs. United States, TO use Of
Tradesmen's Trust Company. Attorney. Philip
Walker
No Iss2 johnson ct al rs. Bryant et al. AttoF-
neys, ". J. Lambert Edwin Mclean, and R. II.
Yeatman-M. y. Richardson and ]. a. Cobb.
Ne, 1854. Bendheim ct al vs.. Piekford. AttoT-
neys. Edward Forrsst-Maddo1 & Galley.
No. 1855. Shea vs. Maefarlsnd ct al Attorneys
Maddox Gatley-E. r. Thomas.
No. 1855 Briscoe vs. Macfarland ct al. Attor-
nsys, Maddox * Gatley-E H. Thomas.
40. I57 Metropolitan Life Insurance. Company
rs. HaEkin. Attorneys Berry & Minor and g. B.
Rowland-W. g. Gardiner
No, 1883. Ferry st al vs.. Henderson. Attorneys.
G. F. Williams and A. A. Birney-ChaTles Poe.
No. 1875. Macfariand ct al. vs.. ElYeTsoD AftoT-
ney, J. F. Smith.