The Birmingham age-herald., 1908-06-15
RECORD OF THE COURTS

Business in the courts is expected to start off with a rush this morning. The reunion put a quietus on business around the court house last we)k, all of the courts adjourning after Monday until Friday. The holiday had too great an effect though and practically noth- ing was done Friday and Saturday. Dockets were somewhat disarran ged on account of the adjournment anu quite a number of important eases were postponed
 chancery Court.
 Dock cts for today are as follows:
 Eunice Land vs. James r. Land. Min nie McWhorter ys. E.. l.. McWhorter, Ida Potts vs John B. Potts, J. C. Walls vs. Mrs. F. Brophy, guardian ct al. N. M. Davis, administrator, vs. James Spake ct al. Louis B. Watkins vs. Kathleen Johnston ct al., casimic ]. Bignon vs Mary F. Bignon Madeline Foote ys G. H. Foote, Annie Majors ys. John Majors, James Conyers ys. Lenora Conyers, James Hughes vs. Leonard Hughes, Carrie Jenkins vs. Mat Jenk- ins, Kate Payne vs Leonard Payne.
 City Court.
 First division non-jury. Judge Ferguson.
 Maria Huffstuttler vs. The Endow- ment Department of United Qcder Odd Fellows, assumpsit; Hamilton H. IIuff- stuttler vs. R. A. Smith, assumpsit; Jefferson County vs. J. l.. Yancey ateal Estate company, ct als., condemna tion, appeal from probate court; Turner Spruiell vs. Alabama Cut Stone con. pany, damages; Black & Dinsmore ct als vs. w. Murray Jones, attachment; John Minor vs Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company assumpsit; Il. C. Fox vs. Thomas Purvis, assumpsit; Rosa L.. M. Parks vs. Birmingham Rail- way, Light and Power company, appeal by defendant; South and North Ala bama Railroad company vs. Henry B. Gray ct als., damages; P. P. Grove ct als. vs T. F. Wood, assumpsit; Sid Smith vs. w. w. White appeal by de- fendant: Evans Bros. Construction com- pany vs. w. S. Braziel, defendant, and Harry Rensford, garnishee, garnish- ment on summons Lillie Davis ys. Bril- liant Coal company, trover; M Stache ei- berg & Co.,, vs. Morris K Erdrech as- sumpsit.
 Second division, jury, Judge Senn:
 Sallie Johnson vs. Western Union Tele- graph company, damages; Charles Kyle vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; w. H. McCaf- frey vs. w. K. Clark, damages E. Tuck CT vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; Annie James vs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad company, damages; Will James vs Louis vle and Nashville Railroad company, damages; Robt. Batey vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company, dam ages; Annie May Thomas pro ami vs. Sir mngham Railway. Light and Power com pany damages.
 Third division, jury, Judge Nesmith:
 w. N. Conner vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; w. D. ripper vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages, John F. Pallock vs. Western Union Telc- graph company, damages; Cordeia Moore vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; J. w. Jordan vs. Great Southern Home Industrial asso- citation, damages; D. w. Morris ct al. ys. Louisville and Nashville Railroad com pany, damages; Joseph Washington vs Hayden Plumbing company ct al, dan- ages; Missie Harris vs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad company, damages J. R. McSwain vs. St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad company. damages.
 Hor hest advertlsir1g cura trY rshe