The Cecil Whig. [volume] (Elkton, Md.) 1841-current, 1908-02-01
GEORGE n. BLHEE,
Solicitor for the PTaintiff.
Order Of Publication
William l.. Bradfeld. Plaintiff.
VS..
ldrania \. BradGcld Defendant.
In the Circuit Court for Cecil Count,
IN Equity, No. $3.50.

The object ri this suit is To procure
. decree al divorce a vinculo matri-
mnnii Of the plaintiff from the defend
ant, and for the awarding OF the guar
dianship and custody OF the children
Of the plaintiff and defendant, to the
plaintiff and for general relief
The bill statcs:--
/. That on or about the Goth day ci
March, in the year 1890, the plaintiff
was married 10 the defendant whose
name was ldcania \. Boyd, ut the
town oi North East, in Cecil County,
in the State OF Maryland by Rev. T.
h. Miller of that place.
, That since said marriage the plain
tit. who was a locomotive fireman
and is now an engineer. on the l'hila
dclphia, Baltimore and Washington
Railroad, and the defendant, have re-
sided in the States Of Maryland. Della
ware and Pennsylvania, according 10
the schedule OF the runs OF the plain
tiff on said railroad, and that the plain
tiff has resided for more than two
wears next preceding this application
for divorce, ut the town OF Psrryvlle,
in Cecil County aforesaid and that the
defendant and the two children here,
mentioned reside in the City Of VII
mington, IN the State OF Delaware, or
elsewhere. beyond the jurisdiction Of
said Court.
!. That ever since said marriage the
plaintiff has behaved himsel. as a
chastc. faithful and affectioratc hus-
band towards his said wife.
1. That two children have been born
OF said marriage. one OF whom is six
teen and the other fourteen years Of
age and both oi whom as well as the
defendant, have been provided with a
home and support by the plaintiff, TO
the time OF this application.
s. That for several years prior to the
month Of March. in the year 1907. the
plaintiff was led TO suspect from the
conduct. language and associations nf
the defendant and from run,o-s which
reached him, that she was untrue to
him and had become an unchaste
woman. but the plaintiff was avcrse to
believing her guilty OF marital TN
faitlIiulncss and hoped that HIS suspic-
ions. as we'll as said rumors. were
without foundation That in the month
Of March, in the year 1907, the plain
tiff, to his deep modification an re-
grct. discovered that his suspicious
were we'll founded and that the de.
icndant had, sine" her said marriage
and within few years prior to said
month oil March, 1907. committed
adultery land so the plaintiff alleges
in the City OF Wilmington aforesaid
where the plaintiff and his family re-
sided
O. That the plaintiff has not resided
or cohabited with the defendant since
said discovery and has not hitherto
made application for divorce, hoping
that the defendant might be reclaimed
but OF this there is now no hope
II is thcreupon this sixteenth day OF
January. in the year 1908, ordered that
the plaintiff. by causing a copy OF this
order to be inserted in some news.
paper published in Cecil County aforc-
said. once in each OF four successive
weeks before the roth day OF Febru-
airy. 1908. give notice TO the said absent
defendant OF the object and substance
OF this bill. warning her to appear in
this Court in person or by solicitor. on
or before the sd day OF March next. to
show cause, il any she has, why de-
cree ought not 10 pass as prayed
MANLY DRENNEN, Clerk.
True Copy-Tcst:
MANLY DRENNEN. Clerk.
Jan 1874