The Montgomery advertiser., 1908-07-10
THE MoNTGOMERY ADVERTISER.

the Republican candidate for Presf- dent. The money was used. the can didate was elected and he continues to deliver lectures on decency and for to congress on publicity of campaign contributions but at times when these were certain to be unavailins. The mitted it's business. and has adjourn
 aThe question of publicity bill was would never have seen the light of day except through the uuaided efforts of one solitary member of the committee Sed it out oniy sSa to wisnsSs ss deep e
 tombment by the body of the convan- tion. Thus died one of my policies. to dictated. language declared ir, it's plat form their unfaltering adherence.
 Injunctfons and Cantempfn.
 @ es me s,,o go on; There ,n has sssn ana regulating, not abolishing, the process of injunction and the power to punish for alleged indirect or constructive com
 s'Ever since 1886 the Democratic par ty has protested against nasty and ill- considered use of ialunctions and has n all cases of constructive contempts.
 The Republican party has been avoiding this question. So the Presi- his letter to the labor unions advocat- ed measure that the Democratic par- ty, acting in behalf of. the correct ad- demandinS l for or twelve % ss yssrs. nif 0sss sss President was in earnest when he sent his message to Congress he was to that extent Democratic.
 We are authorized to conclude that in framing, revising, or dictatfng the Chicago platform he suffered from policy he had SO vigorousiy urged in his official capacity, for he said tn 8 message to Congress:
 T also urge that action be taken along the line of recommendation ! have already made concerning injunct- ions in labor disputes. No temporary Sert Se noee De ana tSs sx tition for a permanent injunction upon which such temporary restraining orr der has been issued should sh be ,ss,:i hesrd q reasonable time--say not to exceed week or thereabouts--from the date when the order was issued. It Is worth considering whether 1t would not give greater popular confidence in the im- partiality of sentences for contempt if 1t was required that the issue should one issuing. the injunctions, except where the contempt is committed In the presence Of the court or other
 'ssureIy ne and his party euiogists at Chicago forgot that he had but a | few months before advised Congress t ihvs Would not S give spestsr popular eon | ddence in the impartiafity of sentences for contempt if 1t was required that the issue should be decided by another
 There has not been session of Congress in twelve years at which the ed law prescribing, defining and re- guiating the issuance Of fnjunctions and providing for fair. trials in con- done @ to give the wage earner fair treat ment and less than nothing is offered to him in the Chicago deliverance. The meaningless generaiitiss of its injunc,t- net | gence Of those who demand reasonable and substantial legislation to prevent the admitted abuse of this Judicial pro-
 Again the President said to Con-
 'Twenty-two years ago. by Act of ognized by law. and the right of labor. | ing people to combine for lawful pur | poses was formally recognized. this tugsl rgnt protection esui of the tndiSiduaI rEts | of the workmen in the prosecution of their trade or trades; and in Act of June 1, 1898, strikes were recognized | as legal in the, same provision that forbade participation, fin or instigation | of force or violence against persons or property. or the. attempt to prevent sSaeas or rom PEe SSsinsss property. IS and 50 must the farmer and s sh wgs ss TSsasr ghs spa ss fsfss5asD soDna | explicitly recognized.
 5And in still another message he
 Tt must be remembered that . l preliminary injunction in a labor case, If granted without adequate proof may