The Birmingham age-herald., 1908-11-17
DAYS RECORD IN
 COUNTY COURTS

The greater part of yesterday morning in the county courts was required for the organization of the juries for the various divisions. However. all of the courts were busy during the afternoon and the grind for the new week has begun.
 Judge Senn is still hearing the case of the Alabama White Marble company vs Mrs. Della W. Enslen. which was begun last Tuesday morning. Owing to the vast amount of evidence which was to be heard the case consumed all of last week in the first division of the city court and will not be concluded until today about noon It involves a breach of contract in the matter Of furnishing stone for the con struction of home on Highland avenue The attorneys are arguing the case and u will probably go to the jury short iy after noon today.
 Yesterday morning Judge c. c. Nesmith took up Judge senn.s docket in the first division of the city court. The case of J. M Clemens X Go. vs. NJ. c. Frank lin is on trial.
 in the second division of the city court the oniy case taken up was that of Joseph B. Hill vs. Central of Georgia Railroad company, which Is on trial.
 In the third division of the city court Judge Ferguson presiding, the case of Ida Gains vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company is on trial
 Judge Coleman, in the circuit court, is engaged in the hearing of the case of the Burger Dry Goods company vs. T. M. Williams.
 In Judge Lanes division of the cir cult court the case on trial is that of Mrs. Mary W Lyde vs Birmingham Railway. Light and Power company.
 The following cases are set for trial today fin the various divisions of the county courts
 City Court.
 First division, jury; Judge Senn presid- ing: w. H. Gillespie vs G. W. Bridges, assumpsit; T. M. Wood vs. E. M. Temple, ct al, assumpsit; Birmingham Coco-Coia Bottling company vs. American Bonding company, assumpsit; Minnie L. Looney vs. Mutual Life Industrial association as- sumpsit Serena Leach vs. T. W. Ha- good, ct als, damages; Phillips-Carey Manufacturing company vs. Frederick Moesser, ct al; Jonas Schwab company vs. A. J. Johnson company. ejectment; Annie Moore vs. Southern Indemnity as- sociation, appeal by defendant.
 Second division, jury; Judge Sharpe presiding: Annie Hudson vs. Kansas City, Memphis and Birmingham Railroad com pany, damages; Steve McLamore vs. Tut wiler Coal, Coke and Iron company T1... Southern Railroad company. damages; Ursula Lee, pro ami vs. Arthur P. Col lot, damages; Lonnie A. Dent vs. J. w. Donnelly, damages; Lizzie Calhoun, pro ami, vs. Republic Iron and Steel com pany, damages; Henry Davis vs. Bir- mingham Box and Basket company, dam ages; Mrs. M. E. Hammett vs. Biiou theatre, ct als, damages
 Third division, jury; Judge Ferguson presiding: G. w. Tonlin vs. B. c. Oak ley, damages; James Craney vs. Birming- ham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; George Clifton vs. Sloss-Shef- field Steel and Iron company, damages Preston M. Cannon vs A. A. Gambill, damages; Mrs. D. o. T1lutts vs. Western Union Telegraph company, damages; William Cox vs Sayre Mining and Manu- featuring company, damages; Louis Fievet vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Rail- road company, damages.
 Circuit Court.
 A. A. Coleman presiding: Clara Hud- son, pro ami, vs. s. P. Stott, ct al, damages; J. w. Taylor vs. Southern Steel company, damages; John Mclean, pro ami, vs. Higgins & Stagg, assumpsit; Pate & Dollar vs. Southern Railway company, damages; Joe Walton vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company.
 A. o. Lane presiding: E. F. Benne- field, ct al, administrators, vs. Southern Railway company, damages; Joe Richard son vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Rail road company, damages; N. H. Fancher vs. St. Louis and San Francisco Rail road company, damages; John Sims vs Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad com pany, damages; Lee Caldwell vs. Bir- mngham Railway, Light and Power com pany, damages.