The Idaho recorder. [volume] (Salmon City, Idaho) 1886-1927, 1908-10-29
DEMOCRATS SHOULD
SUPPORT THE TICKET !
IL dd to Understand How Any Democrat Can Afford to not Vote the
Sdte Ticket When not 50 Doing Is half Vote for Brady.

word In either Of the county repuhli
can platforms concerning local op-
tiony
Is IL not fact that some Of the
republican leaders In salmon have
appealed 10 some OF the democratic
voters who Were well kLown To be op-
posed To local option, TO vote for the
republican ticket because there would
not be any local option laN passed b,
The republican legislature this win.
ter. Is IL not fact tnat they have
gone stiIl farther iu their statement
by saving that the party MAS not sin
ceie in passing such a law, but the
party was forced 20 favor such law
hy the democrats who introduced
such a plank tile Dubois wing and
they were forced 10 do so I'm order 60
catch yotesY Democrats are you So
uusophisticated, even though YOU
may he in favor of an effective Local
option law, As 20 believe the rcpuhli-
can parts will enact any legislation
" this kiudf II they are sincere iu
this promise why DO not their plat
form orators aud their party organs
occasionally mention this plank in
their platform
ln view or the fact that the repub-
lican party violated four out OF their
i've party pledges two years ago have
you nith enough In the party pledges
90 believe that they will give the
state such law 40 their session this
coming election, assuming they viii
via the leeis.l,urcy II YOU DO you
surely have more faith Ia their prom
iseS Judging their future 10y their
past, than has The Recorder
There are other reasons why ever
democrat, who heard Mr. Blady's
speech last week should vote the
state democratic ticket IN place Of
giving the republican party hall "a
vote 10y Only voting for the Bryan
electors In that speech Mr. Brady
iellcitated bis party ON the fact ana
saye that as reason Why the direct
state taxes had been increased Sjg1 .
HHl. 5d more than The we're under
Governor Hunt We DO not propose
10 criticise this statement because n
is iu part due 70 the accumulation OF
state wealth. Where there is occa-
sion iuf er'l'clSm Is because not
"IIhsla""iu2 CNI' great increase ~
'd'ua''o". "o'ei"oI uoooInR ao-
mlhi'lIaIloh mas increased the rate
o' ~ Genus ON lue buhoied dolIdfs'
'"e ''Ip"e'I '' was uudei "oNeruui
NUM- u" - c'i'' on the huilufe"
usI'iIs' or ~ cents I"t last year. aI'
increase 'i "' 'eu's on Jhe huuutto
H''l'fN.
u N'' hI'1l 'dl stopped nj thl'
statement concerning state taxes u
Wou.u Oe Only "o'tn q passing nolice.
lie iur'Hei informed DIS hearers th1'
D5 c'''isih~ Ior grazing Oh sld''
80. ,''''''' , '.' '''.~ '"-' W 'u
'''.' '.'. f'',''- ' - ~ '''-
- '' ''.' w
~ Wv ''.' w I''0 '''''
80 ''' '',' ''' '''" '' ''''''
''' N''''s ,'' us so '' '''' =" =
- US = ''1 10Y, ''''S '"' ''''''' wa, " ~
,..-..-'. va We o., '' '"
10 take NJ. hI"ul own state
mehl' "nsn ne Sala 'uefe was a.
m''i surplus money III lhe tfeasuH
uHuei Governor iiuhi ~ thefe u al
lHe Pie'sne ''"ie' We must 'aAe u '"'
kTanleH 'hAi ID mas cost the laAp'y
eTs o' tne state Tar III excess OF
m'''Ioh u'''af> more L" Iu" 'Ne aHair'
vi state Ro'e'"m'h' uu1et 'he pres
en-. oo"u' .'"''' .n'n i' a'l uDD'l I"'
,'', ',.''..' i''e 'i'i' ~ '''' : ''',''
-. a. -. ''''' 80. -.
,..
3'... WV 80 20 ~
q" '---.-ii' - '''s H!ree' taA'''''
ne h'''' ''e' l.'' u" pay q hats '''
P'''''''' 'iA' s'e4o'' u i COT p'i'
u''. 20 VIII %, '' lhe hfs' OF I'D.
year 40 ''.-al'A-'. iNe Ns'ni''