The Cecil Whig. [volume] (Elkton, Md.) 1841-current, 1908-01-18
GEORGE n. BLHEE.
Solicitor for the Plaintiff.
Order adjudication
William z. Bradfeld, Plaintiff.
VS..
ldcania \. Bradiield, Defendant.
In the Circuit Court for Cecil County
in Equity. No. $50.

The object OF this suit Is 10 procure
A decree oi divorce 4 vinculo natri-
monii OF the plaintiff from the defend
ant aud for the awarding Of the guar
dianship and custody OF the children
Of the plaintiff and defendant, 10 the
plaintiff and for general relief,
The bill states:--
I. That on OF about the Goth lay Of
March, in the year 1890, the plaintiff
was married to the defendant whose
name was ldeania a Boyd, at the
town Of North Fast. in Cecil County.
in the State Of Maryland, by Rev. Z.
X. Miller Of that place.
2. That since ssid marriage, your
orator who was a locomotive fireman
and is now an engineer, on the Pliila-
delphia, Baltimore and Washir8toa
Railroad. and the defendant, have re-
sided in the States OF Maryland. De'a-
ware and Pennsylvania, according to
the schedule OF the runs u the plain
tifr on said railroad. and that the plain
tiff has resided for more than two
wears next preceding THIS app''ca,ioY
Tor divorce. At the town ot Perryyilld
in Cecil County Aforesaid and that IN
defendant and the two children herd
mentioned reside in the City 81 VIZ
minpton. N The State ut Delaware. Oh
elsewhere, beyond the jurisdiction "
said Court.
| 4, That ever since said marriage the
plaintiff has behaved himself as 4
chastc. faithful and aacctionste hus-
band towards his said vile
1. That two children have been born
| Of said marriage. one az whom is six
teen and the other fourteen ears -
age and both ~ whom rs well as the
defendant. have been provided with a
home and srpport by the plaintiff, TO
the time ~ this application.
(. That fer scvcral years pr nr 70 the
month ~ March. IN the year 1907. the
plain,id was led to susprci from the
| conduct. language and associations II
the defendant, and from fuurp-S which
reached him. that she was untrue to
him and had become IN unchaste
woman. but the plaintiff was averse to
believing her guilty 81 marital ur
iaithiulncss ard hoped that h'' suspc-
ions. as well as said rumors. We're
without foundation. That in the month
81 March in the year 1907 the PAIN
tiff. to his deep modification an re'
!. pret. discovered that his suspicious
we're well founded and that the de
PENDANT had. since her said marriage
and within few years prior TO said
month of March 1907, committed
adultery (and so the plaintiff aHcgesl
, in the City oi Wilmington aforesaid
where the plaintiff and his family re-
sided.
I g. That the plaintiff has not resided
5 or cohabited with the defendant since
& said discovery and has not hitherto
=. made application Tor divorce. hopint
I'M that the defendant might be reclame'
but OF this there IS now no hope.
Ain II is theryupon this sixteenth day O
nmm January. IN the year 1908, ordered tha
the plaintiff. by causing copy oi thi
order to be inserted in some news
H0aper published in Cecil County aforc
said. once in each of four suceessiv
weeks before the 10th day 81 Febrt
ynfv. 1d12. give notice 70 the said a6sei
defendant oi the object and suhstnnc
e th's till. warming her To appear
his Court N person or hv solicitor. G
Cur before the cd dag OF March next I
how ranse. ii auv she ms. why d
rec ought not ia mass as prayed.
+ MANLY DRENNEN. Cler
.-ruc Cony-Test;
me MANLY DRENNEN. Cler