Twice-a-week plain dealer. (Cresco, Howard County, Iowa) 1895-1913, 1908-08-14
BRYAN
ACCEPT
In Hearty Accord
With Platform.
SHALL THE PEOPLE RULE
That Is the 0ysrshadowIng
! Question.
j. T.
REPUBLICANS RESPONSIBLE.
REPUBLICANS RESPONSIBLE.
All Present Abuses a Result Of
Their Acts, and They Are In
potent to Correct Them.

/! Mr.. Clayton and Gentlemen Of the
Notification COMMITTEES: can not ac-
cept the nomination which you ofhcial-
ly tender, without first acknowledging
my deep Indebtedness to the Democrat
&c party for the extraordinary honor
which 1t has conferred upon me. Hav-
ing twice before been candidate for
the presidency, in campaigns which
ended In defeat, a third nomination, the
result of the free and voluntary act Of
the voters of the party, can only be ex-
planned by substantial and undis-
puted growth in the principles and pol
icies for which l, with a multitude of
others, have commended. AS these prin-
ciples and policies have given me what
ever political strength l possess, the
action Of the convention not only re-
news my faith in them, but strengthens
my attachment to them.
A Platform Is Binding.
&
shall, In the near future, prepare a
more formal reply to your notification,
and, In that letter Of acceptance, will
deal with the platform in detail. 1t is
sufficient, at this time, to assure you
that am in hearty accord with both
the letter and the spirit of the plat
form. endorse 1t in whole and in
r1o nd oil, oil wi fte
declarations as binding upon me. And.
may add, platform is binding as to
what 1t omits as well as to what 1t
contains. According to the democratic
idea, the people think for themselves
and select officials to carry out their
wishes. The voters are the sovereigns;
the officials are the servants, employed
for fixed time and at stated salary
to do what the sovereigns want DONE
and to do 1t In the way the sovereigns
want 1t done. Platforms are entirely
In harmony with this democratic idea
A platform announces the party's pc
sition on the questions which are at is
sue; and an official is not at liberty to
use the authority vested in him TO
urge personal views which have not
been submitted to the voters for their
approval. If one Is nominated upon
platform which Is not satisfactory to
him, he must, If candid, either decline
the nomination, or, III accepting it, pro.
pose an amended platform in lieu of
the one adopted by the convention No
such situation. however. confronts your
candidate for the platform upon which
was nominated not only contains
nothing from which l dissent, but 1t
specifically outlines oil the remedial
legislation which we can hope to Sc,
cure during the next four years.
Republican Challenge Accepted.
The distinguished statesman who re-
ceiyed the Republican nomination for
president said, in his notification
speech: The strength of the Republican
cause In the campaign at hand is the
fact that we represent the policies es-
sential to the reform of known abuses,
to the continuance of liberty and true
prosperity, and that we are determined,
as our platform nnequivocally declares.
to maintain them and carry them on
In the name Of the Democratic party,
accept the challenge, and charge that
the Republican party is responsible for
all the abuses which now exist In the
federal government and that 1t is i'm
potent to accomplish the reforms which
are imperatiyely needed. Further,
can not concur in the statement that
the Republican platform unequivocally
declares for the reforms that are nee
essary; on the contrary. affirm that 1t
openly and VIGOROUSLY disappoints the
hopes and expectations of reformers,
whether those reformers be Republic,
ans or Democrats. So far did the Re
publican convention fall short of its
duty that the Republican candidate felt
1t necessary to add to his platform in
several important particulars, thus re-
buking the leaders of the party, upon
whose cooperation he must rely for
the enactment of remedial legislation
AS ] shall. In separate speeches. dis
cuss the leading questions at issue, /
shall at this time conline myself to the
paramount question, and to the far
reaching purpose of our party. as that
purpose is set forth in the platform.
Shall the People Ruler
Our platform declares that the over.
Swallowing issue which manifests itself
In all the questions now under discus
sion. is "Shall the people ruler" No
matter which way we turn: no matter
to what subject we address ourselves.
the same question confronts US: Shall
the people control their own govern
ment. and use that government for the
protection OF their rights and for the
promotion of their welfare? or shall
the representatives of = datory wealth
prey upon defenseless public, while
the Offenders secure Immunity from
subservient officials whom they raise
to power by unscrupuloas methods I?
This is the issue raised By the known