The Ellensburg dawn. [volume] (Ellensburg, Wash.) 1898-1914, 1908-09-04
THE TOSS OF A COIN,
Mathematics of the Turning of
Heads or Tails.
CHANCE AND THEORY CLASH.
II Heads Turn Ten Times In Sequence,
Theory Says the Odds Arc Against
Another Head, Yet Chance Says tho
Odds on the Next Toss Are Even.

Theory Says the Odds Arc Against
Another Head, Yet Chance Says tho
Odds on the Next Toss Are Even.
famous mathematician, Professor
Karl Pearson, once spent the greater
part of his vacation deliberately toss
ing shilling and making careful notes
OF how 1t fell. He spun the shilling
10000 times. and n pupil of his, work
Ing separately, spun a penny 5000
times and also tested the drawing of
1000 tickets from bng
1t may seem strange that n learned
professor should put himself to such
an amount of trouble to demonstrate
what every schoolboy who had ever
tossed Il coin already knew. Yet, as a
matter of fact, few really do grasp
the laws which govern such an appar-
emily straightforward matter as the
tossing of n coin. In the words of the
arithmetician, the theory of runs
that Is, heads turning up repeatedly
or tails turning up rcpeatedly-is pre-
cisely ms follows:
| hV 'ii"h'' vi u il'uI IL OIt-fEiIl, OI
two heads following, is One-half multi
| piled by c-half-that Is, One-uuartcr;
| or three heads In succession one half
multiplied by onc-half multiplied by
one-half-that Is. one-cighth. Now,
what do YOU suppose Is the chance OF
run of eleven heads? 1t Is safe to
say that not many persons, however
nccIIStOn oil n nGSin,r rninc
sOncd this out The fact Is that one
run of eleven heads is on the aver
age only To hc expected in 2,O4S sets
of coin tossing
Although the man in the street may
+ not have reckoned this. he is always
quite positive that If. say. a coin has
fallen ten times head upward he is
safe to start backing tails. He puts
his money on tails turning mp be
cause he says. II stands to sense that
the run Of heads cant continue. But
does it? At the eleventh toss the head
of the coin Is just MS big as 1t ever
was. What mysterious influence can
a past event, the tossing of ten heads,
have on future one which has no
link with namely. the tossing
Of the coin the eleventh time? Surely
each toss Is an event by itself, as Sir
Hiram Maxim said of n game at rOu.
lette at Monte Carlo:
ut is pure. unauthorized question
of chance, and II Is not Influenced In
the least by anything which has ever
taken place before or that ever will
take place in the future"
A nasty piece OF plain speaking this
for the cranks who had published
schemes for 'breaking the bank" and
whose plans depended entirely on the
theory that If one game ended In a
win for red" the chances against II
ending red" second time were less,
third time less still, and SO on.
This Of course would be sound
enough argument provided that you
regard some dozens of games OF rou-
lettc or losses of a coin all MS one con-
tinuous event. I: is quite safe. for in
stance, to offer beforehand big odds
against Il coin turning up heads ten
times running But in practice the
public house loafer does not do this.
What he does IS to bet on each sepa-
rate toss by itself. thus defeating his
own aims The odds against n coin
turning up heads eleven times are as
has been shown, something like 1000
to |. But suppose YOU only start bet
ting at the tenth toss What are the
odds against the eleventh toss again
being head?
Tho odds. so far from being 1000 to
| |, are actually | to I! To use an
| IriShiSm, the odds are even-that Is
to say. II You split up the eleven tosses
into eleven separate events to be bet
on separately your bets should be
''even money" all the time, however
often heads turn up running. But If
you view the eleven tosscs as one COM
bined event and you offer prelimi-
nary bet against the whole eleven re-
suits being heads you will have to
give gigantic odds.
All this goes to prove the absolute
uncertainty OF gambling. The great
est mathcmaticians Of the day cannot
be certain how Il coin will fall, so that
the man Of merely average abilities
who stakes anything important on the
toss OF coin Is allowing that part Of
his fortune to pass entirely outside his
control.-Pearson' Weekly.
The Assault.