The Owosso times. (Owosso, Mich.) 1897-1926, 1908-02-28
j. Z. Scofield,
K. II. Wilbur,
A. A. Sutterby.


On motion of Sup. Sutterby, the
report was accepted and adopted by
the following yea and nay vate, called
for by Sup. Smith: Yeas, Sups. Col
by, Griffin, Hicks, Hurrell, Kingsbiry,
Kinsler, Mills, Pennabaker, Perrigo,
Smith, Sutterby, Vincent Vert, White,
Whelan and Wilbur.
The chairman announced that the
hour had arrived at which we have
special order of business, viz: The
matter of the claim of Glare Allen.
On motion of Sup. White, this mat
ter was made a special order of bust
ness for this afternoon at one o'clock.
On motion of Sup. White, the board
took a recess until this afternoon at
one o'clock.
AFTERNOON SESSION.
Board called to order by the chair
Roll called by the clerk. Present:
Full board.
The chairman announced that the
hour had arrived at which we have
a special order of business, viz: The
matter of the claim of Clare Allen.
Sup. Dewey, from the special COM
mittee, submitted the amended claims
of Clare Allen, amounting to five hun
dred and fifty-three dollars and forty
five cents (s553 45); recommended
and moved that Mr.. Allen be allowed
three hundred and eighty-three dol
lars and forty-five cents ($383.45 for
all claims in full against Shiawassee
county, which motion was lost by the
following yea and nay vote, called
for by the chairman: Yeas, Sups.
Colby, Dewey, Griffin, Lowe, Mills,
Peacock, Smith, Webb, Vert and
White, TO- Nays, Bailey, Carmody,
Hicks, Hurrell, Kingsbury, Kinsler,
Pennabaker, Perrigo, Shelp, Vincent
and Wilbur, II.
The motion of Sup. Dewey that Mr.
Allen be allowed two hundred sixteen
dollars and forty-seven cents ($216.47)
for all clamis in full against Shiawas-
see county was carried by the follow
ing yea and nay vote, called for by
the chairman: Yeas, Sups Bailey,
Colby, Dewey, Griffin, Hicks, Hurrell,
Lowe, Mills, Peacock, Pennabaker,
Perrigo, Shelp, Smith, Sutterby, Webb,
Vert and White, IL. Nays, Sups.
Carmody, Kingsbury, Kinsler, Vincent
and Wilbur, s.
Sup. Carmody, from the auditing
committee, submitted the following
report:
To the Honorable, the Board of Su-
pervisors:
Your auditing committee would re-
spectfully report that We have care
fully compared orders from No. 1920
to No. 1859, both inclusive, with the
several amounts allowed by the board,
and find the same orders correctly
drawn as ordered by said board.
E. T. Wilbur,
Z. Carmody,
l.. Webb.
On motion of Sup. Carmody, the
report was accepted and adopted.
Sup. Bailey, from the committee on
records in the clerks office, submitted
the following report:
To the Honorable, the Board of Su-
pervisors:
Your committee on records in the
clerks office would respectfully SUBJ
nit the following as their report:
We have compared school exam
ers' accounts from No. 1 to No. s.,
both inclusive, and find them correct
with the stubs.
Witness subpoenas, none.
We have compared witness and
juror orders from No. 1910 to No.
1861, both inclusive, and find them
correct with the stubs. We find there
has been paid into the clerks hands
for entry, stenographers, jury, fines,
fees, costs, DEGREES, sending cases to
supreme court, marriage fees, hunters
licenses and miscellaneous fees, the
sum of S649.37, which amount has
been paid to the county treasurer,
month by month, as shown by the
clerks receipts.
We have compared the stubs Of the
orders drawn by the clerk as pur-
chasing agent from Oct. LIST to Dec
31st, 1907, with the bills of said
purchases, and find the amounts of
said stubs to compare with the
amounts of said bills, and that he