The Washington herald., 1908-04-25


| No 03i5 United States ex rel Stadiu ct al. vs-
Secretary cf Interior order substituting parties
claimant with ten days to respond 10 answer At
torueys. Webster Baliinger-D. " Baker.
No 1859 Gichner rs. Hill motion for BgW trial
/ oveTrulsd and Judgment verdict. appeal noted
Attorneys L. J. NIather and C. T Hendler-w. A.
Johnston
No. $3.50. Trozzo vs. Chistando: motion for iudg-
ment granted. Attorneys. Loying-FosteF.
No. is95s. Dsish. trustee Zeh; motion 70
refer cause 70 auditor granted. Attorneys Z. H.
Thomss-C. J. 7. Graf and Edwin Forrest.
United States ex rel Lowe vs. Secretary o. In
terrier: order sustaining petitioners demurrer 70
! answer q respondent order directing msndamus 70
issue; appeal noted Attorneys. C. II. Merillat-
/ Stuart Mcnamara.
No. 4s9s king vs. Douglass motion to set day
for trial granted and set May s. 1908. Attorneys,
/ Gordon a GordOn~-G. 7. Collins
/ No. 513Sl. Sisseil " Young; motion for tudg-
ment granted. Attorney. W a. Johnston
4 No. s5oi5 Hudson vs. Pickfogd: order extending
| time 20 settle bill q exception. Attorneys. A. A
/ Lipscomb- Maddox & Galley.
/ No. 4so7S. Walker vs. Warner; mandate q Court
/ Of Appeals granting new trial Attorneys Tucker &
/ kenyon-Gittiugs & ChambeTiin
Assignments Ter Monday, April 2;
/ No. so. Morgan Baltimore and Ohio Railroad
Company. Attorneys. F. .. Blackistone-Hamlton,
/ Colbert. Yerkss & Hamilton.
/ No. s05 Zrkle vs. Chesapeake and Potomac Tels.
/ phone Company Attorneys. Arthur Peter-J. J.
/ Darlington.
No. 4sl United States to use OF Garter and
/ Clarke vs. United States Fidelity and Guaranty
Company Attorneys. Hamilton, Colbert, Yerkes &
/ Hamilton-M- H. Beach
! No, S12 HerFen & Bro. B Kelly ct al. Att0T-
neys E. S. Maloney AID Douglas. Baker & Sheriff.
/ e. A. Jones and Leo Simmons
[ No. 9l, Nash vs. District q Columbia. At
torneys. c. w Cissett-E H. Thomas
| No. ssa. Montrose Lumber Company IS Heston.
Attorneys. Ralston & siddous and T. W. wheaaey
e. S. Duvau, +.
No. 4ss, Hennessy vs Chase. Attorneys, Ne
Gowsn. Serven s Mohun and Nathaniel Wilson and
/ Clarence Z, Wilson-W. J. Lambert
No i67. Hall Capital Traction Company. At
tomeys. Leon TobriRev-R. r. Perry & Son
No 40 Wilisms vs. Richmond, Fredericksburg
and Potomac Railroad Company ct al Attorneys,
A. S, Worthingt0R-HeFber q Mioou Hamilton
Colbert, ferkes & Hamilton and NcKepney s
FlsnneFy
No Bl. Barnes vs.. Slater et al Attorneys
Turner Antcheil-G. F. Williams
CiFenif Court No. z
JUSTICE ANDERSON.
No 1855. Grimm vs. Gibbs defendant granted
leaVs 10 fle additional plea No. 4 and ordered con.
sideTed as fled and ioinder to stand. Attorneys. E.
l.. Gies-H. H. Classic.
No, 1872 Du Rant Lumber Company vs.. Southern
Railway Company; commission ordered 70 issue At
torneys, v Z. Wallace-HamilIoR, Colbert, IsFkss
& Hamilton.
No. l903l- Flynn vs. Staples; continuance stricken
a.
No. 49Sl9 Burroughs vs.. Cave; ordered advanced
for hearing and set for May 3. Attorneys, Il. l. B.
Athsson-J. S Easby-Smith.
No. 5ol69. international Trust Comrany vs.. Crook
time to hear motion for new trial. Attorneys. W.
c. Ciephane-W. J. Lambert and r. Fl. Yeatman.
No. z958. Same vs.. same; same Attorneys, same.
No. 53l0. Newbufgh vs.. Sims, executor; demurrer
e plea oTeTuled. Attorneys ]. H. Adrisans-F. E.
Mitchell.
No. S22s. Kyle vs. Realty Banking and Trust
Company; judgment under seTenty-third rule AttOr-
ney. B. T. Leighton.
No. 0065. Union Savings Bank Es. Hickey e. Al. !:
judgment by defauit Att0rneys Raiston & Sid
dons and ". Z. Richardson.
Assimment for Monday April q.
No. SIS DenisOn vs. City and Suburban Railway
Company ct al, Attorneys H. S. Matthews and
p A. Bowen-R. r. Perry & Son
No. $50, Kaufman vs. Dobbns ATTORNEYS, NJ d,
Rosenberg and u. W. Baksr-Le0 Simmons.
No. Sos HeJman ct al vs. same Attorneys same
No. sa. Rosenthal vs.. Same. Attorneys, same;
motions postponed until Aprl g.
Nc S66 Ff0ulke Co. rs Wilcox. Attorneys,
Tucker Kenyon.
No AIS. johnson Bros vs. Chesapeake and Ohio
Canal Company. Attorneys, WoFthington, Heald &
Frailey-Hamilt0n, Colbert. Yerkes s Hamilton
No i52 Jackson vs.. Burgior. Attorneys. Wolf
& Rosenberg-J. ]. Darlington
No. So Crowley. administrator, rs. Randall ct
al. Attorneys. I. ]. Mather-C L. Frailey
No. 81. Ten Eyek vs.. Andrews. Attorneys J. J.
Darlington-MeKeHn & Flannery
No. 5S. Maher U. RackeE ct al Attorneys. d.
". 0'DonoShue-I. J. Waters