The Birmingham age-herald. [volume] (Birmingham, Ala.) 1902-1950, 1908-01-08

tate of William Marx deceased, VS..
Louisville and Nashville Railroad COM
pany-$10,0O0 damages for death of PLAIN
tiff's intestate 1t is averred that the
plaintiffs intestate was run over in the
yards at Boyles.
Leonard P. Lewis vs.. Southern railway
s9O, 600 damages for alleged Injuries. The
plaintiff AYERS that he was injured in the
wreck at Tallapoosa, Ga, on December
%. 1907.
J. A. Mcpherson VS.. Louisville and
Nashville Railroad company-$1s99 dam
ages for alleged personal injuries.
Circuit Court Docket.
The following cases are set for trial
in Judge Lanes division of the circuit
court today:
viii Baker vs. Southern Railway COM
pany, damages; Evans Baranco pro ami
VS.. Southern Express company, damages;
J. E. salser VS.. Sloss-Sheffield Steel and
Iron company, damages; Archibald M.
Boyle VS.. Southern Bell Telephone and
Telegraph company, damages; Giles Will
hanson VS.. Frpnessee Coal, Iron and
Railroad company, damages.
In Judge Coleman's division of the cir
cult court the following cases are set for
trial today
Ferdinand Furrer VS.. James ]. Odom ct
al. damages; Bruce Overstreet vs. De-
catur Car Wheel Manufacturing COM
pany, damages; George w. Mcdaniel VS..
Woodward Iron company, damages; Ire
land Grafton company VS.. Walter Car
ter, assumpsit; John NJ. Carr VS.. J. N.
Hamrick, assumpsit.
City Court Docket.
The following cases are set for trial
in the first division of the city court
today, Judge Ferguson presiding:
Moore & Handley Hardware company
vs. Atlanta and Birmingham Air Line
railway. assumpst W. s. Moughon, ct
al VS.. Thomas Glenn, ejectment; Charles
p Baranco VS.. Jim Costellos, damages
Peter johnson VS.. David L. Johnston.
appeal by defendant; A. Kanjutsky, VS..
Pratt City Saloon company. assumpsit
Mayor and Aldermen of Birmingham vs.
Ed DIETRICH, eft al, petition for sci ia;
The Phillip Carey Manufacturing COM
pany VS.. L. C. Brnkmeyer, ct al, as
sumpsit; Adolph Dahm Petersen VS.. Biz
mingham Conservatory of Music, ct al,
damages.
In the second division of the city court,
Judge Nesmith, presiding, the following
docket is set for disposal:
Brown Tucker VS.. Birmingham Rail-
way Light and Power company, dam
ages; Charles Kile VS.. Birmingham Rail
way, Light and Power company, dam
ages; w. H. Mccartney VS.. w. w. Clark,
damages; Augusta Jenkins vs. Cable
company of Alabama damages; John
Garland VS.. Birmingham Railway, Light
and Power company, damages; Dennie b.
Anderson VS.. Birmnghm Railway, Light
and Power company, damages.
Judge Sharp, presiding, the following
cases are set for trial in the third d.
vision:
Carlos e. Gardner VS.. Birmingham
Railway, Light and Power company,
damages; William f. McCown VS.. Bir-
mingham Railway. Light and Power
company. damages; Adam Allen VS..
Southern Railway company, damages;
Abraham Raynier VS.. Benjamin Zavelo,
damages; George Clifton VS.. Sloss-Shef-
field Steel and Iron company, damages;
Fred Goldstein VS.. A. A. Gambill, dam
ages
In the equity division, Judge Sem, pre-
siding, the following docket is set for
trial.
f. q. Dean VS.. A. C. Roberts, ct AL;
First National bank VS.. Railroad Com
press company, ct al; w. c. Agee G. CO.,
VS. Louisville and Nashville Railroad
| company ct al; Avondale Mills VS.. Ala
bama Great Southern Railroad company;
Olivia A. Burnside vs. w. H. May, ct
al: Lucinda Arthur VS.. Pratt Mines
Building and Loan association, ct al.