The times dispatch. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1903-1914, 1908-06-07
RETAIN PRIMARY
AND IMPROVE I
CONTINUED from First Page

hNU IIvIl llU1L
Continued from First Page.D
pietc trial as It is. I am opposed 10
State paying expenses.
snn,l. r. Montague, Portsmouth
Majority Of votes cast to elect. state
pay cost OF same.
d. NJ. AEcy. Norfolk.-A detailed
party. plan should De made to apply
to all primaries in the State. or the
Urinary iegaliZed.
J. Gordon Dohnnnon, surry-No
4. II. Moody, Petersburg.-Favor
primary for local elections. Discon-
,i:iue It's use in nominating candidates
for Congress and Governor.
>, D. a. Rowe: AchiIles;-To legalize
didates by primary elections.
W.T.. BtantOn, Farmviile.---For local.
such az county and city. 1t is o. X.
ssnaterial. Enbernatorial etc. state
,. n. Early, Hlllsville.-No sugges.
ton.
w: n. Tiffany, Tho Plains-The only
trouble that / see is the cost to tile
=, Dcn :. :un,er, Accomac- Primary
by the State
Frank Fletcher, jenkins Bridge
Winston Parrish. Portsmouth. =
Amend it SO as to admit any person
az candidate, regardless of his
means !. e.. eliminate the large assess
ments.
G. Hns..l.-.I believe in the masses,
and not the classes. The primary plan
is the best. without doubt,
r. G. Foikss, Richmond.-That the
DR.. d. q. Clement, Ordlnary.-Legal-
ization.
Walter II. Rylnnd, Urbanna.-Lega
ization.
Richard Armstrong, Hampton.-F'av-
or no changes at present. Give 1t
further trial before making any.
John w. Harvey, Lynchburg.-I am
opposed TO candidates paying the cx-
penses OF tie primaries.
w. John Williams, Portsmouth.-No
4. BcIrnc Blair, Richmond.---Favor
any change increasing the power or or
machine or boss rule.
r. w. SHIELD, Hampton.-No suggcs-
ton.
II. r. Beck. Rlehmond.-Adopt a
dldatc a majority candidate. II neces-
sary. have q second primary Tor thla
purpose.
J. II. q. beverley, Chance.-I would
parties, or all parties polling, over
the State pay expenses for holding
the primary election. II modification
i not prefer, prsIssnt system
w. W.. Morton, Richmond.-No sug-
gcstion.
Judge \, r. Smith, Rldgeway.-A
stricter ruIe should BIO adopted. so TINT
in primary elections. think that a
voter In The Democratic primary
should declare that he had voted the
3 Democratic ticket at The last election
j. ". churchmnn. Stnunton.-That
the party sball bear the cost Of the
= f. .'N /. saunders, smyt, county.-No
i. H. sva.., Galax.-As the candidates
have to.oay the expense OF these pr,
naries, 7 would suggest, one judge ana
Democrats participate In these pr,
mnries, can't see why there should
be so much expense. nj,
John y. McNcel. LcSinE,t,on.ee...I y n
expense senla Se sGnns By me FINK
tho Democratic voter should he. listed
and none others allowed to participate
". IT. Durwell, Chincoteague,-No
", Allan l.crkins, Charlottesville.-
Let the cities and counties bear VIZ e
expense, instead of the candltiat ties, the
Amount to be subject OF assessment
When making up the tax levy and u
hc charged only against Registered
". ". Dunford, Tichmond,- No sug.
gesttOn.
j. G. Parker, F'ranklln.--WN,o7uld have ~
the State provide the machinery lol
the election, and would require a ma
jority vote for nomination. VIII Two.
day primnry@if necessary, only the tWt
receiving The highest number or votes
on the first day to be voted ~ for5on t III.
Wntkins 4. NIoorn,nn, Lynchhurg.-.-
an, willing TO mike this our Law.
making Organization. ss@
WIN. IL Nlorrlsett, Manchesrcr,--Ne
suggestion. 4,
NJ. q. Long, Norfolk county, Am Y,
favor OF legalized. PRIMARY, cost 81
Same to ne borne by the state.
w, Nv. lsnIkcr, Hnllshnro Isl Ell
changes, adapted to local conditions
INoluntecr service as to service of reg
istrars anu Judges of election but on
noaed to state paying primary en-
", w, Presaraye, Lenah,--No SIG,
gestion.
.Jaa. e. Phlllipn, Jr.. rsichlnond .---I
paid for by The state. Under tile pres
cnt system. a. quail fled man Who ma,
not have tie means cannot entar VI.
publican or others with n certain nun,
/ her. Of qualified VOters--hold ~ a, Sprt.