The Birmingham age-herald., 1908-01-15
NOTICE

court yesterday as follows The Wood- Dickerson Lumber company vs. Mrs Min na Roegener, sS92 .94, amount alleged to be due by account M. Stackelburg & Company vs. Morris K. Erdreich, $1S7. 5o alleged to be due by account. In the first division of the criminal court, S. L. Weaver presiding, the case of Fritz Braun, charged with stealing from the store of Loveman, Joseph & Loeb while night watchman there. was again passed. On account of the fact | that one of the attorneys in the case was engaged in the federal court Judge Weaver continued the case to be reset Esau Jones, charged with assault with in- tent to murder, was tried and convicted as charged in the indictment against him. The jury fixed the fine in the case at $500
 In the second division of the criminal court Judge A. C. Howze fined J. W. Wolfe and J. w. Condon $lOO. The men aree alleged vagrants. number of other mis- demeanor cases were tried The docket for the day contained nothing but ap- peal cases.
 The following non-capital felony docket
 
 criminal court today:
 Joe McDanel, forgery; John Delaney, forgery; Will Allen, assault with intent to murder; Robert Williams, forgery; Walter Bell, burglary and grand larceny; Lela Moore Moore, mayhem, and Will Johnson, grand larceny.
 The following cases are set for trial in Judge Lane's division of the circuit court today: Ruby Leona Parker vs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad company, damages; James Sharp vs. Western Union Tele- graph company, damages; Claud Rockett pro ami >vs Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company; Margaret A. Reed vs. Southern Railway company, damages Margaret A. Reed vs. Birmingham Termi- nal company damages
 In Judge Colemans division of the cir cult court the following cases are set for trial today
 E.. Well & Co. vs. J. R. Baird, assump- sit; Greenberry Vines vs. Birmingham Iron company, damages; J. B. Kelley vs. St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad company, damages; Mollie Dozier vs. St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad com pany, damages; William F. White vs. Birmingham Scale works, damages. In the first division of the city court, Judge Ferguson presiding, the following cases are set-for hearing today Robertson Sons & Strange vs. Louis Fuller, assumpsit; Mrs. L. E. Cornish ct all vs. Long Distance Telephone and lei egraph company, assumpsit; John w. Smith vs. T. w. Hagood ct al., damages; Roscoe Mcconnell ct als. vs. Gum Drug company assumpst; Gilbert Carter vs- A. c. Ratliff ct al, assumpsit; Hugh Boyle vs. August Fayette ct al., detinue; Ellen Duckett vs. District Lodge Grand Lodge No. 23 etc, assumpsit. Judge Nesmith, presiding, the. following cases are set for trial in the Second di- vision of the city court today: Leesinzo Anduyno, pro ami, vs. Thomas O. Thompson, damages; Frank Douglas vs. Alabama Great Southern Railroad company damages; J. H. Gable vs. Vest ern Union Telegraph company, damages; | Gertrude Pruitt vs Birmingham Railway. l Light and Power company, damages; Dave Clayton vs. Ed Hall, damages. | The following cases are set for trial in the third division of the city court to- ] day, Judge Sharpe presiding: l Jim Jones vs. Birmingham Railway, | Light and Power company, damages; | Jessie R. Johnson vs. Louis Saks, dam 1 ages; Joseph Morrison vs. Birmingham l Railway, Light and Power company, l damages; Charley Williams vs Louisville ! and Nashville Railroad company, dam ages; Charley Williams vs. Central of | Georgia Railway company. damages Mrs. Jennie Jungles vs. Birmingham Railway, 1 Light and Power company, damages.