Eagle River review. [volume] (Eagle River, Wis.) 1890-1927, 1908-01-31
STATE SUPREME COURT.
List of Decisions Handed Down at Mad
iSOn.

isOn.
MADISON, Wis. Jan. 2S.-[ Special.l
The supreme court today handed down
the following decisions:
No 100 State of Wisconsin, respondent,
VS.. Wisconsin Telephone company, appel
liant. rehearing denied.
No 1853. Andrew HOMELAND, appellant, VS..
National Blower Works, ct al, respondent,
reversed.
No. 1859 Wilbur Lumber company, appel.
liant, VS.. Milwaukee Light, Heat and Trac'
ton company, respondent, reversed, new
trial.
Milwaukee, Light, Heat and Traction COM
pany, respondent, reversed, new trial
No. 173:: Eta GOA, appellant, vs.: Mil
waukee Light, Heat and Traction company,
respondent, reversed, new trial.
No. ia. Andrew r. Templeton, appellant,
VS.. Milwaukee Light, Heat and Traction
No: lis. Whitney Brothers, appellants,
VS.. Milwaukee Light Heat and Traction
company, respondent, affirmed.
No. 176: Ella A Marsh, appellant, vs.
pany, reversed, new trial.
No. III. Jacob Petrie; appellant, vs.. Mil
waukee Light, Heat and Traction company,
respondent reversed, new trial.
No. 17S. In re will of Elizabeth Nc
Naughton Andrew j. Frame, exr., etc, APP
pellant, VS.. ma j. Plum ct al. by guardian,
No. 49, In re appointment of guardian
for Hiram A. Merrill, George w. Merrill,
appellant, VS.. Hiram A. Merrill respondent,
No. $50. Leo Schlesinger, receiver, etc.,
appellant, vs. Albert Ellinger, respondent,
No. 1s5. John E. Molle. respondent, VS..
Kewaskum Mutual Fire Insurance Co, ap,
pellant, reversed; new trial.
Citizens National Bank Of Green Bay, re-
spondent, vs. Jacob Harter ct al, appel
lants, reversed.
No. 1871 j. Hemmingsen. admir-. etc, re.
spondent, VS.. Chicago & Northwestern
Railway Co., appellant, affirmed
No. 1873. William Gussart, respondent, VS..
Greenleaf Stone Co., appellant, affirmed.
No. 1885, Cook Land Construction and
Producing Co, respondent, VS.. Oconto com
p4ny, appellant reversed; new trial
No 100 Edward Ryan, appellant, VS.. es.
tate of Eliza Ryan, deceased, respondent,
No. 1866 State of Wisconsin ex rel. Ed.
ward Vanderwall, respondent VS. mayor
etc, of city of Phillips ct al, appellants,
No. 100. State Of Wisconsin, respondent
vs. o, Il. Peterson ct al, appellants, at
No. 200 Ambrose Haley. respondent VS.,
Dewitt Van Ostrand. appellant, affirmed.
No. 1911. Lawrence Fleming, by guard
ian. appellant, VS.. Northern Tissue Paper
Mills, respondent, reversed.
No. 1874 George w. Langley ct al re-
spondeents, VS.. G. f. Sanborn, appellant, re
yerSed.
NJ; Maxcy, appellant, affirmed
No. 1O1. Charles E. Barker, appellant,
vs. Western Union Telegraph company, re-
spondent affirmed
No; POP. A. R. Mead respondent, VS..
William Simpson, appellant reversed
No. 2O6. Village of Prentice, respondent,
VS.. John w. Emerson, ct al, impld., etc,
appellants, affirmed.
Other proceedings of the court were:
No. 2O9. Hagan VS.. McDermott, exr
Argued by A. w. Shelton for appellant and
submitted for respondent on brief.
No. 2O9. Edgar VS.. WisneWski. Argued
by Mr.. Rosenberg for appellant and NJ. A
Hurley for respondent.
No. 21O. Herbst ct al. VS. Land and Loar
company, argued By c. S. Carter for ap
pelIants and by E. NJ. Smart for respondent
No. 211 In re village of Unity. Argued
by George L. Jacques and K. J. MacBride
for appellant and by Mr.. Rosenberg anC
Neal Brown for respondent.