Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1908-05-29
LEGAL NOTICES.

IN THE srPREME COURT OF THE Els
trict of Columbia. Holding a District Court.
United States Of America. I.ibellant. 100
Sacks of Flour,-nistrict Docket. No. 30. T"
all whom i; may concern Take notice that on
the 18th day Of May. 1905 libel was filed In
said court by III" United States of America;
through Daniel W. Baker. its attorney in an
for the District aforesaid. praying the seizure
for condeunatio ion, in accordance with tho act OF
Congress approved June 80. 1906 "a L. 5. stat.
at Large part I: page 1881. commonly known
tho food and drugs act, of 200 sacks
or less. of flour branded and labeled ''Cereta
High grade Patent Flour. The Sanitary Grocery
COMPANY. Washington y. c. the same heing
consigned and shipped by the Orrvle Milling
'"mpnny At orrville. state Of Ohio. to the Orr
vile Milling Company at Washington u. c..
the Sanitary Grocery Company of Washington.
u. g.. 10 be notified. the said articles of food
ing t"mnany of Orrville. Ohio BY said libel
II is alleged that the said 100 sacks Of -four
ar" Illegally held within the jurisdiction Of said
court. FOR that the same are misbranded in VIC
latton of said act Of Congress OF VINE 80. 1906
and liable +" condemnation and confscahle. as
provided therein in that the said 200 sacks of
fonr. and each and all OF them. labeled and
branded "Ceretn High-grade Patent Flour. The
Sanitary Grocery Company. Washington. u. G..
flour was manufactured and prepared by the
Sanitary Grocery Company of Washington. II. e..
iumhia whereas. in fact. the said -four was not
manufactured and prepared by the Sanitary
Grocery Company Of Washington. ID. C.. at the
said city of Washington. District of Columbia
Int the same manufactured and prepared
by the 0rrville Milling Company Of Orrville
Ohio. AT Orryie. In the state of Ohio. The libel
further alleges that the said 1000 sacks Of
f"nr, mshranded aforesaid. have been trans
ported from the state of Ohio to the District of
columbia. and within the jurisdiction
Of said court. and remain unloaded. unsold and
In the original unbroken packages...in said Dis
triet. and offered for sale in said District
The said libel prays that said court adtu1ge and
decree the said 200 sacks of -four to be mis-
branded. and that the same he condemned and
disposed OF by sale. the proceeds fess legal costs
and charges. to be paid into the Treasury OF
the United States. and that should the costs no.
he satisfied out of the proceeds Of said sale or
otherwise. that the court decree costs against
the owners or holders Of said 200 sacks Of flour
The warrant of arrest for said | 200 sacks Of
-four duly issued hv said court. returnable
on the Sth day OF June 1905. at 10 O'Clock am.
at which time said court will proceed to hear
and determine said cause. Under said warrant
said 200 sacks of -four were seized by the mar
slta of said District. and held by said
marshal awaiting the proper order Of said court
All persons having claiming any right. title
or Interest in the sa Id sacks of -four. in these
proceedings. are hereby warned and notified to
appear herein on the Sth day of June. 1908. at
10 o'clock am This order to he published in
The Evening Star and Washington Post. news
iapers published in the city OF Washington, Dis
trict of Columbia. seven different DAYS in each
paper prior to the salt Sth day of June. 1905
BY the court JOB BARNARD. Justice. Seal
\ true copy Test: J. r. YOUNG. Clerk. by
+. f.. CTNNISGHAN Assistant Clerk.
nlyo1 Is 30 je1 3. II