The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1908-10-11

neacut, to ascertain te nend Of sentiment in the three states regarding the
indicated piuraHues for president in Ne~ York:
HRS%%~~s ds B%R 1afsS5
T Tsfss indicated plurality in entire state, l5s4r lis" 1926
above n Bronz ......"..""..""IiSGO $500
cSamers indicated plurality in cntre state 1865: n'"" """'
raf Sf 4cs Ss'i BEy uInd ISae5 n Taffs Indicated ay fG Pnfaats an so Rapraf'y for president:
TAFT iHseS Bryan, @a6 4a@% ndt@teS pP p%sit5 5q 1000 S%~"s "r 'essafn'
figures obtained by tn World In Greater Nw York the World mad a postal
neche Sm esdTna aa Wm o%d edr by Of til %T WorSc @H pom Ttw fIom Re aG Tm7
tS sm foSoEtt me- e0nelG US S1s1 afs Ne eGr * 1 so i f6e ana By Gis aS @RGG Of the rG sSSSS
for Democratic caaddae for SFs governor y% s5%sS; fr HHdspendenes party t eandf
F ne not S%s5 am 6@' y y as Is. l gs%f r. 35s%e; HUGHES he total 3s ' 9a. Total 2I 5 e 81 to
be 10000 in round 1s numbers HsaTsts vote sasO 90 n aushss vote $4,000;
estimate ts yofe Of 1908. calculating IN increase of $1,000 votes over tn 1906
e ta sa &eS 8f SaSaSo. '1 pf sss h ha 6s1s. b 1890
Total of Did vote -;
T F1asl Est. s54a S5 S'R P6s Il s s@ l%s f4 1 RsPa5nes sf ' Candidate .:."~".:..:ss z iss
Plus q PT cent + 100000; Ger gain indicated by canvass ."~::." $3.50
F F9P 1s s@F%S s9 6a %s Ps%Rdsie4 G @aoa' SIS N pes Gent of he 100000 in '"'O
5z7 per- cent Of the estimated increase Of $4,000. ...... $SSS
,,d 4s % gP ~ fo estimates esass s SEN tt. by til me fn. w %dd SoT TM . a%s are th% %E of ts
of %et te w Sg @ of for TnfegI the % peS ~efb battle GH% The ee conaih Pne tnte Es f fo dt m 0ayHb bee
tte a e1rs T MAN 6a r awng i'm 5e r aee r weKs ltbs4 man ng g OF n 1e fn gnHgi6a a ad
The r sss s6at o. 3e v %sod hss Just n tS Ssf aay in 1Dc cSa"fe oa aB6ss he Bronx show
% %%H in ' &so fHer m @ arT for Sna an @' aes ns sns 1905 mega s fe sa n' eoan tie
Hughes win lose above h Bronx ssass votes, me Mr. chanier VIII gain o@sr
The estimates show ever more marked changes in the presidential situation
T ms61 geaFS s9 agO ndiylhy We Of the m sane Psrf Hfy 2H G T%e Go1If ave c Mrs Roq }D tt
table printed today show majOrides for Taft aggregatng 14S500 m for Mr.
Bryan IF 14O. So that accordng to the estimates. Mr.. Taft will Ose, if pres
etc conditions continue 81 1895 m Mr. Bryan will gain 1852 The estimates
show tha while MI. Taft will not hold all of the Roosevelt vote of our years
ago. h will command at cas- 10 per cent of it.
The reductions noted in tn estimates are mainly in he factory centers
ad ae due to these causes:
E5SsSn @&%'5 5se!s S%a"a2as sf s%s: m%y til. s.o %s 6a, of employees
Thrd-Oppositon to Governor Hughes, because OF his reforms
It is a significant fact THAT none of the new parties figure in the alcuattons
Of the leaders Of tn old parties In some of the factory w tn SOcIaHst
vote is referred to- ut apparently is not a disturbing actor in IN opinions of
Parss to ssp voters within h old, INES : sIsm IN tn Rspqenasn ma:
note conceded to be as popular a candidate as President Roosevelt r IS good a
vou-getter. Little if my explanation is offered by n Republican leaders to
account for this indicated falling Of in their party voe beyond the fact that
it Is primarily due to industrial causes.