Iron County register. [volume] (Ironton, Iron County, Mo.) 1867-1965, 1908-11-12
PEOPLE MUST KNOW
LIGHT ON PANAMA CANAL DEAL
is DEMANDED.
Records in Possession Of the Govern,
ment Alone Can Clear Up Scam
dal Which Soon Will Become
National Disgrace.

The Chicago Journal says that 1t is
we'll known that somebody bought
the stock of the defunct French Pana-
ma Canal Company for $12 1000, 900 or
less and sold it to the United States
government for $4,000, O0O." And the
Chicago paper declares further that it
is mot now known to anybody out
side the gang of spectators that
reaped a rich harvest by playing on
the patriotism of the American peo-
pie, how much of that SIS, 1000, 900
went into the pockets of President
Roosevelt's intimate friends, who pro-
NOTED the DEAL" 1t has been said on
what seems to be good authority that
the governments check for SAC, 900
was paid to ]. Pierpont Morgan. But
no one knows how the sum was d.
vided. Charles P. Taft has denied
that he got any of the money. But he
is the only person who has made a
denial. We have seen no word from
Douglas Robinson, q brother-in-law of
the president. Yet he has, at least
through rumor, been connected with
the transaction.
We do not think, however, that any
denial, no matter how vehemently it
may be made, ought to be accepted as
conclusive. For all the records are
in the possession and under the con-
troll of the government. The appeal is
to them. Mr.. Cromwell, no doubt,
knows who got the money. Possibly
Mr.. Morgan is not wholly ignorant OF
the details of the negotiation. AS
long as the facts are thus suppressed,
the people cannot be blamed for sus,
pecting the worst. They remember
the close relation of our government
to the inspired revolution in Panama,
which resulted in u getting control
of the canal strip. They remember
the sudden turning from the Nicara'
qua to the Panama route, and this in
spite of the fact that the experts had
recommended the Nicaragua route.
These two events beyond question
greatly increased the value of the
stock of the Panama company. And
now, when we hear that an American
| syndicate was the chief beneficiary OF
the change of plans, and of the made.
to-order revolution, the people natur.
ally feel that they are entitled to an
explanation.
When all the documents in a case
are in the possession of men charged
with or suspected of improper action,
or in the possession of their friends
the duty of such men is of purse per
fectly clear. They must make the
documents public. A failure or a re
fusal to do so is equivalent to some
thing very like a confession. AS we
have said, mere denials will not serve
when the men who make them refuse
to produce the evidence which would
support them, that evidence being in
their possession. When men refuse
to deny the case is of course still
stronger against them. All the papers
and accounts of the French company
passed to this government when il
purchased the property. The facts
can be had from the government and
the government alone. We think the
people are entitled to them, and be
fore the election, too. Men who have
in their possession evidence which
would prove or disprove a certain al
legation, and who refuse to produce it
cannot complain If their refusal is
construed as proof of their unwilling
ness to have the truth known. Thai
Is both sound morals and sound law
We know that the American govern
ment paid $40, 900, 900 for the ~propert.
of the French company. To whom was
that money paid? That is the ques
ton that must be answered. We
think further that the American peo
pie, without distinction of party
ought to demand the facts in thei1
completeness. They do not mean t.
accuse, or even, to suspect any on
unjustly-do not indeed want tt
thing evil of any one. But what arr
they to do in a case like this? The!
know that there is in existence al
abundance of evidence to disprove al
charges, and that evidence has so ia,
been withheld from them. Why is |
withheld ?-Indianapolis News.