Warren sheaf. [volume] (Warren, Marshall County, Minn.) 1880-current, 1908-11-19
BREACH OF PROMISE.
Manner In Which the Law Treats It
In Different Countries.

In Different Countries.
England is the best place, from the
plaintiffs point Of view. for breach
of promise action. All other coun-
tries seem to regard with grave sus-
picion any attempt to recover none
tary compensation for the loss Of a
prospective husband. and unless the
Plaintiff has very strong case indeed
it is never worth her while to carry
her grief into the law courts.
In France breach Of promise cases
Nre rare. for the simple reason that
the law requires the plaintiff to prove
that she has suffered @pecuniary loss.
Now. this is not an easy thing to do
on the part of the lady, especially In
country where a girl without dot
that is, a marriage portion-has a poor
chance Of finding a husband. Holland
and Austria have adopted the French
SYSTEM and the result has been about
the same Breach Of promise actions
are rare, the injured damsels or their
relatives usually taking the law into
their own hands.
IdStASdl NCA "d1iy, Lu1SAL NC Ca
pected. has perhaps the best method
for solving this problem. When a
young couple become engaged they
have to go through public betrothal
ceremony that ought to knock all the
shyness out of them. In the local
town hall the pair declare their affec
ton, willingness to marry. etc., ending
by signing a collection of documents
that apparently leave no loophole for
escape But if either party to the con-
tract wishes to withdraw another jour-
ney is undertaken to the town hall
and another collection of documents
signed, witnessed and sealed. Then
the authorities determine the question
Of pensation-should it be claimed.
In this connection it may be said that
the man can and often does claim
! solatium for his wounded feelings.
The usual award is one-ffth of the
marriage dowry. 1t is easy to under
| stand when all this is remembered
how loath the young people Of Ger
many are to break their betrothal
| oaths. 'r ~ HI
AS the law Of Italy affords little or.
no protection whatever to Tilted dam
sells or SWANS, it is not surprising that
the stiletto should be the favOrite mode
Of deciding breach Of promise cases.
The Italian law demands that the per-
son suing for the breach shall produce
a written promise to marry from the
defendant; otherwise the action cannot
proceed. This difficulty is almost in
| surm ountable. and the Italian judges
are seldom troubled to adjudicate be-
tween one, time lovers. 4
To bring an action for breach Of
promise Of marriage against reigning
monarch is an achievement, but it has
been done, and by an English lady.
Miss Jenny Mighell sued the sultan Of
Johore, and as there was a doubt
whether the dusky one was actually a
reigning monarch the case was allowed
to come into court, but the judge quick
! " disposed Of the action by ruling it
inadmissible for the reason referred to,
and Miss Mighell was nonsuited.
It Is remarkable that one of the two
actions which have brought verdicts
i for Flo, 600 each to the plaintiffs should
have had for its defendant the editor
Of matrimonial paper. The second
case was between a well known actress
I and the eldest son OF an earl London
Tit-Bits