Eagle River review. [volume] (Eagle River, Wis.) 1890-1927, 1908-04-03
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS.

MADISON, Wis, March 31.-[Spe-
cial. THE following decisions were
handed down today by the supreme
court:
VS. Chicago. milwaukee, 4 St Paul Rail.
way, company, appellant; reversed, new
No. 1S-Henry Meinecke. appellant, VS.
Nose Smith, respondent; reversed.
No t9-Chicago Milwaukee x st. Paul
Railway company, appellant, VS.. Lemon
weir River Drainage District, respondent
No 20-Segelke 4 Kohlhaus Manufactur-
ing company, respondent, VS.. James Vim
cent. appellant; affirmed.
William IL. Shafer. appellant; affirmed
No. 23-Wiliam Miller, admr., etc. APP
pellant, VS.. Chicago, st. Paul, Minneapolis
Il Omaha Railway company, respondent;
No. 25-Rl Conner company. appellant,
VS.. Aetna Indemnity company, respondent;
No 27-H. r. LANG respondent, VS..
Minnie Eichstaedt Williams, appellant; ar
No 2S-Eliza J. French, appellant, VS..
Fidelity and Casualty company of New
York, respondent; reversed. new trial.
No pa. Il. kuhlman company, respon-
No. 30-Eieanor b. Williams, respondent,
VS.. Foss- Armstrong Hardware company, APP
pellant, affirmed.
Thomas Tobin ct al, respondents, affirmed
No. 34-Alva Slocum ct al, respondents,
VS.. Northwestern National Life Insurance
company, appellant; reversed.
No. 36-A. +. Lusk, appellant VS.. Slough
ton State bank, respondent; affirmed
No 37-Albert Wood. appellant. VS.. the
town Of Washington. respondent; affirmed.
No. 3S-Morris Hahn, appellant, VS. ChiCa-
go, Milwaukee X st. Paul Railway company
respondent: affirmed.
No. 39-L. +. wells ct al, respondents, VS..
Charles Il. AndreaS, appellant affirmed
No. 40-Loverine-Brow company, appel
liant. VS.. Abbie Cowles Travis, respondent;
reversed.
No. 4I-State of Wisconsin ex rel. Alex.
ander O'Neill, respondent VS.. Charles
Trask, appellant; affirmed.
No. Ed. l.. Bestor, respondent, VS.. In
ter-CounN fair. appellant; affirmed
No. 43-Martin OKeefe. appellant. VS.,
William Stephenson, respondent; affirmed.
No. 21T-State of Wisconsin, eX rel WI
Krumenauer. town clerk. etc, ct al, appel
lants; reversed with directions to dismiss
the action.
No. 2iS-Statr of Wisconsin ex rel. VIII
liam Rowe. petitioner, respondent, VS.. Il.
Florin, town clerk, etc. ct al. appellants;
reversed with directions to dismiss the ac-
No. 21o-State of Wisconsin cx rel VIII
liam Rowe, petitioner, respondent. vs.. W.
w. Johnson, clerk, etc, ct al appellants
reversed with directions to dismiss the ac-
ton.
No. 22o-State of Wisconsin ex rel. Will
liam Rowe, petitioner. respondent, VS.. Her
man Berlin, clerk, etc, ct al, appellants
reversed with directions to dismiss the ac-
ton.
No. 221-State of Wisconsin OK rel. Will
liam Rowe. petitioner, respondent, VS., Il. G..
IIine clerk. etc, ct al, appellants; reversed
with directions to dismiss the action.
No 222-State of Wisconsin rel. VIII
liam Rowe. petitioner, respondent, VS.. A,
c. Mimic, town clerk etc, ct AL, appel
lants; reversed with directions te dismiss
the action.
Other proceedings were:
No 4T-McDonald VS.. knapp ct al, argued
by c. d Jackson for appellant and by VIM
Powers aud =. J. Rooney for respondents.
No 5o-Donuclly VS. Sampson. argued by
A. w shelton for appellant and by w. t.
Ouinlan for respondent.
No 81 Brown ct al VS.. Dunn, argued by
w. Il. Quinlan for appellant and by A. w
shelton for respondent
No. 52-1eipner VS. Teipner, argued by r.,
j and A. T. Goodrich for plaintiff and by
H. T. MorSon for defendant.