La Junta tribune., 1908-10-17
GUARANTEE OF DEPOSITS
Bypass SeAsas Does Net Meet D.
mands.
Inhsrsnt Weakness Of the Dome
cratic Plan Pointed out-
Youngstown

Spcech.)
The plan proposed BY the Demo
catic platform to provide for q guar
antes Of bank deposits II open to seri'
Gus objection. Mr.. Taft promptly
pointed out its weakness, and Ar.
Bryan. despite his skill. has been un-
able effectively to answer his criticisms.
The plan proposes to make the honest
and prudent banks meet losses for
which they are In no way responsible.
Mr.. Bryan replies that all banking re-
strictions operate to curtAil the free
dom Of the prudent because Of the
dangers arising from the abuses OF
others. But II is one thing to put q
business under needed restrictions op-
Grating impar,ialiy and quite another
to compel banks TO make good specific
losses not attributable In any way to
their neglect or default.
III this plan is good one for the
banks. why should 1t not be applied to
insurance companies? They are
chartered by the state and nre subject
to Its close supervision. Life insur-
nnce, for example, Is one Of the es-
sential safeguards of the home, and the
interests Of the policyholders cannot be
too surely protected. But what would
be thought Of a proposition to compel
the well managed and conservative life
Insurance company to make good the
losses which would be sustained by those
insured In other companies that be.
come insolyent; This would largely
deprive the former OF the Just benefit
OF its own conservatism and well earn
ed reputation and make easy the efforts
OF the unscrupulous.
The business OF banking and insur-
supervision; but those institutions
which operate fairly and prudently
within the law should not suffer either
from lnxity Of governmental supervis-
ion with regard to others or from i'm
prudences and frauds with which they
have no concern.
"Mr. Bryan tries in vain to meet the
criticisms that the plan proposed
would encourage reckless and dishon-
est men. who would seek deposits on
the faith Of such an assurance. II
must not be forgotten that they do not
conduct their enterprises with the ex-
pectation OF failure, nor do they con-
template loss to the depositors: but
deposits are the sinews Of banking en-
terprise. and to the extent that such a
guarantee would facilitate them In OBJ
tanning deposits the opportunity for the
play OF illegitimate purposes and the
temptation to indulge such purposes
would obviously be increased. Mr..
Bryan asks would 1t not be worth
something to the stakeholder in pes ,e
Of mind to know that the maximum Of
his loss would be the value of his stock
and the 100 per cent liability. and that
NO deposition could lose anythingT 1t
may be supposed that there would be
an added peace Of mind" on the part
Of managing officials. And this diminu-
ton Of anxiety and of the sense of
moral responsibility with regard to de.
posits could not fail to have its effect
upon the prudent conduct OF the busi-
ness and place q serverer strain upon
governmental supervision. The condi-
tions under such a plan would newt
ably tend to increase banking losses,
however they might be made up. 1t
may be added that the guarantee fund
II II were established ON a scale sumo
iently large to insure the required pro-
lection. would furnish difficulties both
with regard to its Investment and its
availability in emergencies.
This proposed plan does not meet
the demand for an elastic currency
system through which the monetary
wants Of the country may be supplied.
To supply such 4 system is an urgent
necessity. and its provision would obvi-
ate many of the dangers which have
hitherto existed; but to make banks
pay for losses they have not caused il
to depart from proper principles and
to encourage improper practices"