The Mitchell capital. (Mitchell, Dakota [S.D.]) 1879-1918, 1908-04-03
oRAwro1D AaA11,sr IT m l,o,.

oRAw1o1D AGAINST IT IN 1sss.
rh, asoads well. It is catchy. But let u. see what he thought
ao sSs1 ! sri @se'? Z, !: m 4sss SsSa 5s By sS{se Aliens * rs s OF nfN Colts;
f f6Sy1 RY P, For o TaE as REG14E RY OF p MTa4 1GT DAMA 6 = : FOR g
WAY GoMPANIEs r NOT SETTLED FOR WITHIN SIXTY
was pAf pas rspM M G }so7t @ %F 2 9a5' Asrs q As 1g gs have IS said ft this same T@ Ri1
aSgSEi T T52EE T. , TaE = Sq 2 Sa$ad ~ E VS. Us 75 i %5S-
f FszRSis59Sz T thf gsos og ming LAY, law. w, WaY . R9Es 5o mE SEQ se91B Bo The
WHAT WHAT HE DID IN 1889? THEY WERE ENDORSING HIS CON
it all to Senator Kittredgef Is he honest but forgetful, or is he a
K1rTREDGE FOR IT IN 1890
sEHAToE S K1TTR r sHHe On TH HfS SAME Ell B1EI lint intrd sneGH IN G fSe
1t was Senate Bill 40. introduced by Mr.: Erickson of Union, a loyal
fet d'ss@1 and = pe et ne an sdn nur "a pS Sy fs assassin aa in0 of isss' MR. TO- K NY
TREDGE VOTED FOR 1T (Senate Journal p 52S). Compare the
sRd%ro 81 f5e Also so' VOTES 6f1 \ r t5s # #e a ( 1880. It VIII u Y be IF Pe If w t1ss
So RAD A RRq pn9S5d9N, IN 1889 TT. THA -, IE W W MT21 Mo o. : IT'S IS
GOOD ESoUeH TO VOTE FOR NJ 1892 Wv Was 5 it because a he was as
yN5 u D HE BARE 5Af d Do AT " B1sMaRc 1S'V WHAT q H Us F S3a1SFfaeD rs
DO AT AT PIE pnGRf flth,1 If , So. what would would he he not not dare to do at Washing
Its enemy of 1889 might be able to explain why and how. Has the
fom, %o been tSa ,a sngaeions in in s sailing g attention fen iogm to o this s valuable les %a
The slayer of House Bill "a ought to have let his dead sleep undisturb-
t. IT, IN 1890
~ A5pER n K1!TfSa n n 5 ISIS : THAT SANE h1w : exM - Up
IN 1890 blouse Bill 52). TT WAS PASSED AND BECAME A
LAW (Chap. 14. Laws of 1900. SENATOR KITTREDGE VOTED
FOR 1T. CRAWFORD VOTED AGAINST TT. (Senate journal D.
sl4). READ THIS LAW AND DECIDE WHO IS THE PEOPLES
FRIEND. WHICH ONE OF THESE MEN, WHEN BOTH WE'RE
ABLE TO VOTE ON VITAL MEASURES, VOTED RIGHT? IG-
MORE GENERAL CiARGEs-LOOK TO THE RECORD. THE
CONSCIOUSNESS OF GOOD INTENTIONS DISDAINS AMBIGUI-
TY; STAND OUT FEARIEssLY AND FACE YOUR FOE. GIVE
HIM A FAIR TRIAL. "By their fruits We shall know Them In 1898
and 1897 the legislatures made this law, supported by Senator Kittredge.
1T AT BISMARCK AND TRIED HIS BEST TO DO so AT PIERRE.
We produce the first section of the law that the voters may know
what Kttredge stood for and what Crawford fought. Here it is:
"Sec. L. DEFINING WHICH TRUSTS ARE UNLAWFUL9 That any
combination, agreement or trust made, entered into or formed between per
sons, opatnerships or corporations, in this state, or by or between any per
partnership or corporation without this State, with inten and which shall in
any manner tend to prevent a free, fair AM full competition IN the production,
aanufacture o. sale IF NJ artice or commodity Of domestic growth, use y.
manufacture or that tends to advance the price 10 The user or consumer of any
the reasonable cost OF production orm manufacture thereof, or that tends tx ad-
vanc the price to teu ser, purchaser or consumer of farm machinery, nipple
any other State, Territory or country beyond the reasonable cost of production
and sale or manufacture ant sale of the same, or which tends tic md does induce
and accomplish a sale of wheat, corn, OATS barley, fax, cattle, sheep, hogs or
other farm or agricultural products for lest than such farm or agricultural
or agricultural products would sell for in open market if such combination
agreement or trust did not exist, orr tends to or shall increase, enhance OF main
tan, rates OF interest OF loans of money, for the forbearance of tn payment
of any SUI If money, or debt, or to prevent a fair competition for low rate
obligation, is hereby declared to be against public policy and unlawful and
void, and any personor persons who shall be a party to N such unlawful com
bination, agreement OF trust, OF who shall in any way assist, aid or abet any
suh combination, agreement or trust, either as principal, agent, attorney, m
ployee or otherwise shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and upon conviction
thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars or
Imprisonment in the States Prison lot exceeding three years, or both such fine
nd Imprisonment at (the) discretion of the court'
WHY DID CRAWFORD OPPOSE IT