The Washburn times. [volume] (Washburn, Wis.) 1896-1976, 1908-09-24

! Careful Banking Best.
Under present conditions there are
conversations in favor of careful and
| conservative banking There are peo-
nile who are not influenced in their Sc
| lection cf a bank by the highest rate of
Interest offered on deposits, and who
have their suspicious aroused by the
tender of exceptional inducements.
They know that such offers put a
strain 11pon the business, and they de-
liberately prefer to place their money
with q banker who will not subject
| himself to such strain. These deposit
ors esteem safety above all other con-
siderations, and they are numerous
| enough to exercise q very wholesome
| restraint upon reckless tendencies in
the business. banker now prizes the
reputation of doing safe business,
and cannot afford to have a reputation
for imprudence and speculative in
clinations. And yet, although held in
check by these powerful considerations
the pressure of competition carries the
business near the danger line even
now. There is too much competition
for deposits, and the ambitions of the
more venturesome members of the fra
ternity, and the pace they set, puts the
| whole system under strain.
But what are likely to be the con-
ditions in the business when the public
is no longer concerned about the man
agement of a bank, and all the re
wards for conservatism and restraints
upon recklessness are removed? The
| considerations which in the past have
tended to safeguard the business and
advance it's standards would be gone
The public would care nothing for the
personality of the banker. Instead of
looking to the institution which receiy-
ed the deposits, the depositor would re-
ly on an outside fund A banker
might bet all the deposits on horse
| races without the fact becoming
matter of any concern to his custom
erS.
And how would the conservative
|
ditions? The legitimate reward for
maintaining that character would be
lost to him. He would get no deposits
unless he bid as high for them as his
rivals. for the government would stand
behind the latter, and assure the pub
lie that they were just as safe as he
and tax him to make them so. In
short the reckless and incompetent PEG
pie, who are now either excluded from
the banking business, or held in check
by the distrust which a discriminating
public feels towards them, would make
the pace to which everybody else in
the banking business would be obliged
to conform or get out of the business
Would DemoraIfze Business
The hardest competitor in any line
Of business is the incompetent or dis
honest man who does anything to get
business. Such people get into the
banking business even now, but their
number and influence for mischief
would be greatly increased if they
were backed up by unlimited credit. In
ether lines there may be some question
as to the quality or service offered by
| rivals, but all bankers deal in the same
kind Of money, and if deposits were
made joint liability there is no rea-
son why they should not go to the
bankers who offer the greatest induce
ments to attract them. The careful
banker would have no offset or protec-
ton against demoralizing competition,
and he would be placed in the strange
position Of being liable for his COM
pstitor's obligations.
All efforts to make it appear that the
interests Of bankers are on one side of
this question and the interests of de-
positors on the other are untrue to the
facts. Nothing that in the long run is
harmful to the banking business, that
puts it under strain and tends to low
er it's standards, can be beneficial to
depositors or the public. 1t cannot be
advantageous to the community to have
its savings and working capital pass
into the hands of the venturesome
class of bankers who will bid most for
them. The actual waste and loss
through unwise investments would in
evitably increase. 1t would fall at first
on the conservat tive bankers and penal
ize them. Instead of an elimination of
the unfit, which is the true process Of
evolution, the tendency would be to an
elimination of the best. Eventually the
burden of increasing waste would have
to be borne by all deDositors and the
whole community.
| Oklahoma Trial InconcIusive.
The fact that the first bank failure
In Oklahoma after the law went into
effect, was followed by immediate re-
endorsement of the depositors, proves
nothing as to the practicability of the
system in the long run The fact that
the State banks of Oklahoma have
gained deposits since the system went
into operation, while national banks
within the State have lost, if true,
proves nothing as to the merits Of the
! system The law itself requires that
all public deposits must be kept in
banks that belong to the system, and
this provision alone would cause con-
siderable transfer of deposits and in
fuence some banks to join the system
| The real test of the policy will come
| in its Influence I1nOn the BANKING huSi