The Birmingham age-herald., 1908-05-21
RECORD OF THE COURTS

M E. Hammett for $10.000 damages, this amount being asked for alleged personal injuries received by the plain tiff's minor son. Rufus, while In the employ of the defendant. A suit was also filed by Rufus Hammet by his next friend, Mrs. M. E. Hammett, for an equal amount.
 In the circuit court a suit was filed by John R. G. Gaudin for 5000 dam ages against the Pullman Palace Car company plaintiff alleging that he had been damaged to this extent by being carried by his station. A similar suit was filed by Mrs. Gaudin.
 Minnie S. Carroll filed suit against the Birmingham Railway. Light and Power company for $10,000 damages this amount being asked for alleged personal injuries.
 Clio Timmordino filed suit against the Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company for s10,OO0 damages on account of personal injuries.
 In. Judge CoIeman's division of the circuit court a consent Judgment for $50 was arrived at in the suit of Ella
 
 Light and Power company.
 The plaintiff took non-suit In the case of V. A. Howard vs. Ellen N. Coal company.
 Plaintiff also took non-suit In the case of William Shaw vs. John M Me- Cartin.
 Tn the suit of Monroe Jackson vs. fiold n the plaintiff took non-suit.
 The jury returned a verdict of s375G in the suit of J. T. Wright vs. the St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad com pahy.
 The case of Clara Hudson pro aml. vs. W. P. Stott, Miss Willie Raub and others is on trial in this division. This suit is for alleged permanent injuries recseived by the small daughter of the plaintiff at the hands of the defend- ant, who is a school teacher. It is charged that the defendant whipped the child severely with a switch and also slapped her face, injuring the ear.
 In the chancery court a decree was handed down sustaining demurrer in the case of T. E. Byron vs. M. E. Bell sher.
 The suit of M. M. Stewart was dis missed.
 The case of Albert Allen vs. Aline Allen was dismissed.
 A decree everything demurrer was handed down In the case of w. w. Hollingsworth ct al. vs. Alex Gillespy ct al.
 A bill was filed to be allowed to re- deem certain real estate and acquire title in hte case of Maggie Taylor ct al. vs. w. N. Davis.
 Tn tho sacou1 divisiop of tho oitN, court the suit of Richard Cloud vs Buckeye Cotton oil company continues on trial
 In the third division of the city court the jury returned verdict for $50 In the suit of Mary E. McDuffie vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company. E |. The suit of Nicholas Milkites vs. Bir- mingham Railway, Light and Power company Is on trial
 Chancery Court.
 The civil dockets for today read as fol- lows:
 North Highland Land company vs. James Rasey; Joseph M. Stubbs vs. Dyer H. Vann ct al.; A. J. Vines vs. Margaret Vines ct al; Mabel Moral ct al. vs. Bir- mingham Railway, Light and Power com pany; Mayor and Aldermen of Birming- hahn vs. Mrs. c. E. Mccoy ct al. May Bloodworth vs. George Bloodworth; E. W. Rucker vs. W. c. Shackelford ct al.: Felecia Tedescki vs. Lottie Hill ct all; Felecia Tedescki vs Laura Hill ct al; !; Felecia Tedescki vs. George Mhatley ct al; Felecia Tedescki vs. l. Barnett, alias Blanche Bernard.
 City Court. | First division, Judge Ferguson. Jury | c. N. Penrod vs. E. F. Riley ,assump- Lett IT D son & Co.,, ct al, damages; Boize Cotton | Oil Go. vs. Perfection Mattress Co.,, as- | sumpsit; Isaac J. Armstrong vs. J. H. Terrell, damages; Wood -Dickerson Luni- Der company vs. Mrs. Emma Acker, as- sumpsit; L. A. Holmes vs. Central of l Georgia Railway company, damages; Bir- mlngham Real Estate and Exchange vs. 1 Mrs. Sallie Street, assumpsit; James E.. 1 Clinton vs. Charles Thompson ct al, dam l ages. Mrs. Addie Jones vs Central of Georgia Railway company, damages; Mo- ris Mining company vs. Avery B. Ingra n, | assumpsit
 Second division, Judge Senn. Jury. 1 w. W. Poss vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company damages; Mrs. Mamie Trammell vs William Majors, damages; Tom Dimmins vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Powo- company, dam | ages; Onie Kuster vs. Republic Iron and | Steel company, damages. Third division, Judge Nesmith. Jury. | G. B. Archer vs Birmingham Railway, | Light and Power company, damages; ". L. Humphreys ys Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages J. | A. McPherson vs. Louisville and Nash i vile Railroad company, damages; J. P. Cooper vs. Birmingham Railway. Light and Power company, damages.
 Circuit Court. | Judge A. O. Lanes division Jury
 Mary Boiling vs. Birmingham Railway, l Light and Power company, damages; Monarch Plumbing and Steam Heating company vs. Louis Arnstein, appeal by plaintiff; Sarah E. Wright vs. Birming- ham Railway, Light and Power company, l damages; George Brown vs St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad company, damages; Dominica Pizzamiglio vs. Ten nessee Coal. Iron and Railroad company, l damages.
 REPUBLICANS HOLD l TNyYIIlTNmTn AM nIuuIIr