The Salt Lake tribune. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1890-current, 1908-10-22
Continued from Page One.

Continued from Page One.
held. considered or treated property or
CO.. second. IL provides that nothing agreed
-sSus upon or done by two or more parties @ IN
connection with a labor dispute shall con,
,7. offense. or be prosecuted as such unless; unless
,is ne DONE ani"s e. asrsS% sSsle epR pndSduS Sa
srous Nj The bin here described IS not only the
" ,4-remedy that Mr.. Gompers has already
cue U Snnd only ;'rcmedy" which he and those
hsys lassociated with him In his present mnve-
the ,rrept in the matter OF his grievance against
tbe \ the courts on the Injunction issue
lc aS Matter of Record.
rroMMa The counsel for the American Fedora
~ ~ Afion OF Labor. and Mr.. Gomperss It's
ina president are on record to this effect
ar % n AT a hearing before the house COM
ne Ro omttee on Judiciary the counseI OF the
The e-AmeEican Federation OF labor on rgptu, I'ua
np l.~ary o. 1905 (as appears from the printed
~ aea ''Tht bin was considered BY at least
4 cN two sessions OF the executive council OF
W W RS that organization, and unanimously ap-
art q, aproved. 1t was considered by two OF It's
national couventlons-thc two latest
tho and by these unanimously indorsed. And
ANS I, In the face OF the many propositions
81 ,wxto omend IL. In the face Of many proposed
~ o,. .asSstubsttutcs IN the face OF pressure from
ySnol1seyciy direction, from high sources and
al ,eources not SO exalted. the organization
adinp 1nss stood by and is today standing ty
aIy ,this bill without amendment"
ula,.y Mr. GtInrers himself, introducing this
tSs,,e'bill before the same committee. Feb:u-
90 ..,sary 2S 1908 (as appears from the printed
cT '1u VI learlngs). went on record as follows:
Iastta Events ave demonstrated clearly 10
0le rry mind that there Is only one bill be-
fore the committee that can at all be ef-
9 I,, fectlve TO deal with this abuse. with this
on 3, ,Invasion OF human rights: and that Is the
nm. tPcarrc bill"
ora aws9 Further on in the same page OF the
'us Hearings, MI Gompers states;
rupI Federations Position.
m 81 will say this. that think Will try
W tato make my position clear that the
real american Federation OF Labor has SO de-
lcsu rcleared Itself that II must insist upon the
eo,rprnciples involved in the Pearre bill and
he h that l explained as best could the po-
H. -; Nsition Of labor-that we would rather be
Lm.s compelled to bear the wrongs which we
y lIea have for longer period than 10 give
!, . ~ our assent to the establishment OF a
fan that time would give the justice and re-
nate lief to which labor-the working people
"Is This bill, then, and mona other. repre-
:, :, sents exactly the relief that Mr., Com
10 y g pers demands in the way of anti-injunc-
MT ton legislation, and II the statement In
rch his letter is correct, this bill represents
e, o what Mr.. Bryan and his party are
srI pledged to In the matter OF antl-iniunc-
|, - ton legislation.
. & The Injunction plank in the Bryanitc
.Isii M platform may sound vague and hazy, but
,inn there is nothing vague or hazy about |
nplb this bill
oft II is more than bill: II is programme
ly = II Mr.. Gompers is correct, this bill be-
hs, comes; as IL were, an appendix To Mr'
al ,s Bryan platform or or a footnote explain
dcs junction plank in that platform.
to = Does Mr.. Bryan accept IT as such?
aft 4 Mr.. Bryan should state publicly wheth-
" AVER he In fact accepts the principle OF |
NM this bill, which is the official programme |
I Y,Sr1of Mr.. Gompers and those who stand I
. " with him.
ere Mr., Gonpers announces publicly that !
ng ellhr Bryan's party has made this pro- |
lsSe gramme Its own. Is Mr.. GomperS |
portr rect In this statement?
ssgs Question Is Settled.
ed. Either Mr.. Gompers is mistaken as to
N s.-7the matter OF another injunction legisa-
h bs tion or those who drafted his party plat
ne mpromse so clear that the general public
understand it precisely as Mr..
ouS SGompers understands It,
bat Mr. Bryan failed In his letter OF ac-
10 sccptance, TO discuss this labor plank OF
il ms partyS platform So far as am
thai There should be such discussion as a
matter OF colnmon fairness not only to
lahor; but TO all citizens alike. on a
UpeopIe are entitled 10 know where Mr.
W|Biyan stands.
M Mr. Taft has repeatedly explained ex-
ynctiy where he stands in this matter OF
=, Regulating !njunctIons
Are we rot entitled to know with equal
tfclearness exactly where Mr. Bryan
IW Mr.. Gompers's public statements as to
lI%hat his party promised make II i'm
| operative that MIR. Bryan should declare
| ihms.ii
THIS bill 70 the principle OF which, he
IihsdS' MI i5"yGn is p!"'iE cd declares tnat
Tthe rlsr, Ia carry a business in a
Xawful way shall be not REGARDED as a
lllproperty right entitled 20 the pro.ec-
tlon cf -ourt OF equity through the
process Of an injunction that the
E;gh. 20 such protection. which aCm ried-
NJ now cN;stS under .he law. shall he
llt1keu away
I'M Statement of Attorney.
L. The counsel for the American Fedora
mon OF Labor. In his examination before
eae houSe, Fe5ruary ). M wlli' Il Mr
lAfrN.F illustration of wnat he and Mr.
lNbompers ocieved 10 be Il consc1uauCe
'sos that provision OF that bIl which SAYS
right H-0Ne'S
n His words are:
suppose that workingmen by some on
| ntrhuon OF proceedings in the community
Vlet us say by violence or persua sion ar
picketinS away from the premises) re-
nuce those works TO state OF utter help
tessness, and there was not wheel
lin Eat and Get Thin
but modern methods of reducing fat beve
fnade this revision possible.
hh1,siyI II you are overfat and also averse to
DKabe and sti!l want to reduce your excess
pess,hnl several icy pounds, do this: Go to your
RRussist Sor write the Marmola Company
,khem) 70 cents. For this modest amoInt
Ri money me druggist Will put you In the
Vaiee. trim. slim figure, He will hand YOU
Y large case Of Marmola Prescripijon Tai
s,s 1co',Pounded In accordance with the