The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1908-08-27

thereon; and said board having duly
considered said petition and heard
all the parties interested for or against
the construction of said ditch and all
other matters pertaining thereto, find
as follows, to-wit:
First: That the said civil engineer
has completed his work and made and
| filed his report thereon in all respects
| according to law.
Second: That the viewers appointed
herein have duly completed their
labors and have made and fled their
report thereon according to law.
Third: That the estimated benefits
to he derived from the construction of
said work are greater than its total
cost, including damages awarded.
Fourth: That the damages and bene-
fits arising from the construction of
said ditch have been duly awarded
and assessed, and that said work will
be of public utility and promote the
public health and that said reports of
said engineer and viewers are COM
plete and correct.
Fifth: That notice of this hearing
of said petition and of said viewers
report and said engineers report has
been duly given, published and posted
and mailed as by law required, and
that proofs of said service of said
notice have been duly made and filed
in the Office of the county auditor of
said county, and that all other pro-,
ceedings in the matter have been made
and taken in accordance with the pro-
visions of law.
Now, therefore, as conclusions from
the foregoing findings, we, the board
of county commissioners of the county
of Mile Laos, state of Minnesota. at
said session of said board held at the
time above specified, being satisfied
that the proposed ditch will be of
public utility and conducive to public
health and public benefit and con-
venience, do hereby locate and estab-
fish the said ditch according to the
report and the specifications of said
civil engineer made and fled herein:
and do hereby establish and confirm
the report of the viewers made and
filed herein.
It is further ordered, that the dam
ages awarded to the persons and COR
porations named in the viewers report
herein, in excess of benefits, be paid
out of the county treasury of said
county on warrants to be drawn and
attested by the auditor of said county
and signed by the chairman of this
board of county commissioners, and
delivered to the persons entitled
thereto as provided by law.
Given under our hands this 21st day
of August, A. D. 1908.
By the Board,
G. E. ERICKSON,
Chairman Board of County Com
misisoners, of Mile Laos County,
Minnesota.
Attest:
% E. E. WHITNEY, County Aud
itor, and Ex-Ohicio Clerk of Board.
(Ohcial SeaD
In the matter of the hearing on the
petition of Hans P. Hanson and others
for county ditch No. 8, in the county
of Mile Laos and state of Minnesota,
it appearing by satisfactory proof to
the board of county commissioners of
said county that due notice of the
tendency of said petition, and of the
time and place at which the same
would be heard, had been given as re-
quired by law, the said petition was
duly considered by the board, and
arguments of all persons interested
therein for or against the construction
of said proposed ditch duly heard and
considered, and on motion of L. S.
Libby, seconded by John Dalchow and
carried by unanimous vote of the
hoard, an order was made and filed
appointing r. S. Chapman as a COM
petent and experienced engineer to
make an accurate survey of the line
of said ditch from it's source to its
outlet, as provided and specified in
and by Chapter 230 of the General
Laws of 1905 and amendments thereto.
In the matter of the petition of Hans
P. Hanson and others for county ditch
No. 8, on motion of T. E. Potts,
seconded by John Dalchow, and car
ried by a unanimous vote of the
board, an order was made and fled
appointing George Schmidt of the
town of Princeton, Fred J. Holmes of
the village Of Milaca, and D. G.:
Wilkes of the town of South Harbor,
three resident freeholders of said
county, who are not interested in the
construction of said proposed work
and not of kin to any of the parties
known to be interested therein, to be
viewers of said proposed work and of
the route thereof. o.
In the matter of the hearing on the
petition of Henry A. Hubers and
others for public ditch No. 9, in the
county of Mile Laos and state of
Minnesota, it appearing by satisfact-
DRY proof to the board of county COM
missioners of said county that due
notice of the tendency of said petition,
and of the time and place at which the
same would be heard, had been given
as required by law, the said petition
was duly considered by the board and
arguments of all persons interested
therein for or against the construction
of said proposed ditch duly heard and
considered, and on motion made and
carried by a unanimous vote of the
board, the said hearing was continued
until the next session of the board.
In the matter of the hearing on the
petition Robert Hanson, asking to be
set off from school district No. II to
school district No. 81, the following
order was made and adopted by
unanimous vote of the board: