The Birmingham age-herald. [volume] (Birmingham, Ala.) 1902-1950, 1908-02-05

was trying the case of William Bowl
negro charged with murder. an
Judge Weaver was hearing the case
Of Will HUMPHREY, negro also charged
with murder.
The following capital felony cases
are set for trial in the first division of
the criminal court today: John Dag
nan, murder; Nors Tate, murder; Jim
King, murder, and Frank Howard rob-
berry.
In Judge Lanes division of the cir
cult court the following cases are set
for trial today:
Duro Blanko VS.. Mayor and CITY
Council of Ensley, damages; William
lYey, administrator, VS.. Louisville and
Nashville Railroad company, damages
Eatman VS.. Pratt Consolidated Coal
company dana ges; W. w. Hare VS..
Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad com
pany, damages; Claude c. Morton vs.
Birmingham Railway, Light and Power
company, damages.
The following cases are set for hear
ing before Judge Coleman in the cir
cult court today:
Hester Harrell VS.. Southern Railway
company, damages; Mary Wise vs. Ten
nessee Coal, Iron and Railroad com
pany, appeal by plaintiff; NJ. L. Wilson
VS.. Henry Tegen appeal by defendant:
John C. Webb & Sons VS.. Dubose Bros.
Iron company, appeal by defendant: w.
l.. Jones vs. Alabama Great Southern
Railroad company, damages.
In the chancery court the following
!, cases are set for hearing today:
b. F. Roden Grocery company VS.. The
MacAfee company ct al, Mary j. Nc
Cormack vs. Mayor and Aldermen of
Birmingh am Birming halh Realty COM
pany VS.. Mayor and Aldermen of Bir-
mngham, Margaret Allen VS.. E. A.
Wilson ct al. b. r. Selman VS.. Railroad
Compress company, C. Atwell Johnson
VS.. Sloss Sheffield Steel and Iron COM
pany, V. C.>Smith VS.. Lillian Keby ct
al, Jonas Sch wab company VS.. John
Byars ct al, William T. Quinn VS.. Ten
nessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company
ct al, d. NJ. Bremen ct al. VS.. William
ii. Lane ct al.
In the first division of the city court,
Judge Ferguson presiding, the following
cases are set for trial today
|. W. Fields VS.. Louisville and Nash
vilyle Railroad compang, damages; r. E.
Smith VS.. H. Price, ct al, appeal by
defendant; Philip Burnsten, ct ais, vs..
3. Zavelo, assumpsit: j. NJ. Clemens &
Co.. vs. n. C. Franklin, appeal by plain
tiff Frank E. Brammer VS.. J. b. Ander
son, ct al, damages; Reasoner Bros.
VS.. Birmingham Floral Co. assumpsit;
Ralph M. Ward & Co., VS.. Birmingham
Floral Co., assumpst Birmingham Wa
ter Works Co., VS.. w. R. McGaVock &s
Co., damages; George Nichols vs. Peter
Gatales, assumpsit.
Judge Sem presiding, the following
cases are set for trial in the second di-
vision of the city court today:
Nose Drake VS.. st. Louis and San Fran
cisco Railroad company, damages; Sam
uel H. Smith VS.. Birmingham Railway,
Light and Power company, damages; j.
II. Mccullough, administrator, etc, VS..
Atlanta and Birmingham Air Line Rail-
way company, damages; Robert Johnson
VS.. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad
company damages; Dave Bullock VS.. Pho
pany, ct ais, damages; James w. Ed
wards VS.. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Rail-
road company, damages; w. M. Ashworth
VS.. Birmingham Railway, Light and
Power company, damages.
The following cases are set for trial
today in the third division of the city
court, Judge Sharpe presiding:
Vosie Williams, pro ami, VS.. Birmng-
ham Railway, Light and Power COM
pany, damages Alabama Sulphur, Ore
and Copper company VS.. II. C. Weller,
damages; Luther ]. d. Cohron VS.. West
ern Union Telegraph company, dam
ages; J. J. Albert VS.. Birmingham Rail
way, Light and Power company, dam
ages; Lawrence Volmer, pro ami. vs.
Birmingham Railway, Light and Power
company, damages; Hannah Lalferd VS..
Hates Transfer company, damages.