The Nome daily nugget., 1908-09-10
DISTRICT COURT
 DAILY MINUTES
"Wednesday sept 2

transfer uf retail liquor uCcus, No aeiu fropla Brown and L. Guud-rsgu to W Wettergren. Nome Hearing on petition continued until Monda yu,x, at 10 a. ID.
 Beau ss Campian Mining x Trad ing Co. C. $ Hannum on behalf al the plaintin, prrsrutr da motion fur order confirming sair. which motion was granted and order confirming sal, signed by the court and filed
 Beau Mercantile Company vs Cam plon Mining x Trading co. C. < Han. mum. counsel for IIaintin. presented g motion. for order confirming sale, which was granted and order confirming sale signed and filed
 This being the day srt for hearing applications for citizenship and thcrr being ao applicants present. the court srt Ire first Monday in October 1908 for hearing petitions.
 Patterson ys. Universal Mining co. ct al This case came regularly uu for triai before the court and jury. Thomas l.. Shepard appearing as c"uu- sei Ter plaintiff. no appearance being made for the defendants. counsel T. " Reed having herptnfor. withdrawn fraH tbe ease The jury A smp4nrIed and sworn to try the ease was as frl- lows John Bennett C T. Baylcs. John Blake Wm Brrtzc John Jacob son. N E. Kirk. Edwin Stevens. Bert Simms. Henry Sudbury. R ] Samtrs. Chas Watson and Henry Xavier ban iel r. Patterson Wus sworn and trsti- fled iH his own behalf. and tht tcsti- mauy closed. ard on motion uf counsel the court directed the iury to return verdict in favor uf plaintiff where upon the jury returned the following verdict. In the District Court fur The District of Alaska. Seeaua Diyi-- ion Daniel F. Patterson plaintiff vs. The Universal Mining C" and George F. Wiley. defendants Verdict We. the jury cmraucited to try the above entitled cause. do find our verdict in favor of the rlaintin and against the defendants. the Universal Mining Com pany and George F. Wiley. and do as sass the plaintiffs damages against said defendants at the sum af $3cGo. W L. Kirk foreman. The court di- rcrfed that the verdict be filed and cu- tered of record and the jury Wrre ex- cnsed from fuatger consideration of this case. and all jurors Were excused unGl Monday next at 10 a. n.
 Cawdeu vs. Enestrom et al. This ease came regularly on for trial before the court. T. NJ Reed appearing for the Plaintfr presented the default uf defendants and offered the following proof Charlcs Mil"t Samuel Archer. and Fred R CnWaeu Were each sworn and testified pn hdhaIf of plaintin, and thereafter counsel offered in cvi- denee the following bills, which were admitted in evidence and marked as | follows: Fill of Archer. Ewing X Co. for S2333O. Jan 1. 1908, marked plain | uns exhibit \. bill of Darling X Dear | for S2S B. Aug. l. 1908. and assignment of account to Archer Ewing X Co. attached thereto. marked plaintiffs eN ribit F.. bin of Sehcid X Co, $4S.5O, paid by F R cawden Oct l. 1907 marked plaintiffs exhibit C. Counsel then presented to the court judgment in favor of plaintin for $44s.O5 and costs. which judgment was signed by the court and filed.
 Howard vs, cold Beach Development co. et al. This ease came regularly on for trial before the court, G. Il Pack wood appearing fu1 plaintiff and W. \ Gilmore for defendant Gold Beach De vclopment co. C. T. Howard. the Iplamuff. was sworn and testified in his own behalf. after which plamtin of- fered in evidence claim of plaintiff which was admitted and marked plain tiff's exhibit A. and the testimony clos cd. w H. Packwood was sworn and testified as to value Of services as att torney. and hereafter counsel present. ed decree in favor of plaintiff in the sum of S555.59 and costs, which was signed by the court and papers filed.
 olson vs. Cape Mountain Pin Min ing co. This ease came nfor trial be- fore the court. Geo. n. Sehofield ap- bearing for the plaintiff nc appearance heinz made for the defendant Coun-
 sel presented the default of the de- fendant after which A. W. olson was
 sworn and testified in his own behalf The witness identified a chattel mort
 gage and note accompanying said mortgage in the sum of $3.23l.50, sign ed by defendant to the plaintiff as mortgagee. which said mortgage and note were admitted in evidence and
 marked respectively plaintiffs exhib It's X and E. Counsel also offered in evidence the appointment of l.. l.. Saw yer as agent and acceptance of agent for the Cape Countain Tin Mining Co.
 which was admitted in evidence and the testimony closed, and counsel pre-
 scented findings of fact and conclusions
 of law and a decree of foreclosure which were signed bV thp court auf