Daily Kennebec journal. [microfilm reel] (Augusta, Me.) 1870-1975, 1908-10-02


the court has ordered that the decree
of divorce formerly made as to the
custody of the boy be changed ana
that the mother have the sole custody
of the boy and that he may be allowed
the privilege of visiting his father and
the father the boy at proper times anc
occasions W. H. Fisher, Esq. of Au-
gusta appears as counsel for the
petitioner.
The following are some of the new
civil entries on the docket:
j. Waiter Folsom and Ernest
Masterman versus Nathaniel Adams,
all of Readfield, an action, with the
ad damnum, placed at 500. to recover
on account annexed. Anson NJ
Goddard, ESQ, of Augusta for the
plaintiff and Beane & Beane of Read
field for the def Nndant
Margaret j. Butler versus Helen
Yeaton both Of Boston, an action
with the ad damnum placed at 500.
to recover on account annexed. An
son NJ. Goddard, Esq, of Augusta ter
the plaintiff.
Edwin P. Ladd and Benjamin w.
Chamberlain. both of Gardiner, versus
w llilSloIl H. SSllldli vi W Cfoe Nis'' N'''iN''
an action, with the adj damnum placed
at 5000, to recover on account annexed.
Charles A. Knight, Esq, of Gardiner
for the plaintiff.
Max Goldberg of Gardiner Nerst-"
Irving Judllins of Willimantic, an
action, with the ad damnum placed at
500, to recover on account annexed.
Charles A. Knight. Esq, of Gardiner
for the plaintiff and L. r. Waidrpn,
Esq, of Dexter for the defendant.
George r. Wingate of Gardinti
versus George w. Hcselton of Gardi-
ner. executor of the will of the late
Wilson NJ Hattin of West Gardiner,
an action. With the al damnum placed
at SPA, to rrcuN"" on account annexed
Charles A. Knight ESQ. of Gardiner
for the u aintifT and George W. Hescl-
ton, Esq, Of Gardiner for the defend
ant.
Edgar e. Norton versus IIlbcrton r.
Lancaster, both of Gardiner, an ac-
ton, with the ad damnum placed at
500, to recover possession of port
able bath tub Charles \. Knight
Esq. of Gardiner for the plaintiff and
George w Hcseiton, Esq, of Gardi-
ner for the defendant.
Charles A. Knight of Gardiner, as
signee of Waiter T. Moore Of Ran
dolph. versus Arthur Plummcr of Ran
dolph, an action, with the ad damnum
placed at 5000. to recover on account
annexed. Charles A. Knight, ESD Of
Gardiner for the plaintiff.
Merriam Henderson OF Gardiner YER
suS William G. Dawes of Auburn, an
action, with the ad damnum placed
at 500. to recover on account annexed
Charles A. knight, Esq, of Gardiner
for the plaintiff and Tascus Atwood
Esq, of Auburn for the defendant
Joseph Myers of Randolph versus H.
]. Hescock and f. w. Atwood, both ni
Phillips an action. with the ad dam
mum placed at 500, to recover on ac-
count annexed. Charles a. Knight,
Esq, of Gardiner for the plaintiff.
Emma Louise Cochrane, cXecutriN
of the will Of the late DR.. G. a. Coch-
rane. versus Phoebe Libby, both of
Winthrop, an action with the ad dam
mum placed at $50, to recover on ac-
count annexed Frank l.. Dutton,
ESQ. of Augusta for the plaintiff
Ticonic National Bank versus f. r.
Kimball, both -Waterville. an action,
with the ad damnum placed at $500, to
recover payment on a promissory note.
Cook & Small Of Waterville for the
plaintiff.
W. r. Gage versus Napoleon Provost
and Gideon Provost, all of Augusta.
an action. with the add amnum placed
at $10O to recover on account annexed.
T.. ]. c. Little Esq, of Augusta for
the plaintiff
w. D. Hutchins of Augusta versus
Norman Smith of Bowdoinham, an
action, with the ad damnum placed at
$50. to recover on account annexed.
Williamson & Burlcigh of Augusta for
the plaintiff.
Edith Andrews Phinney Of Augusta,
an action, with the ad damnum placed
at $500. to recover on account annex
cd. Williamson & Burleigh of Au-
gusta for the plaintiff.