The herald and news. [volume] (Newberry S.C.) 1903-1937, 1908-10-06
GARRISON CONVICTED
SENTENCE TWO YEARS
LAURENS MAN WHO SLEW HIS
DAUGHTERS SWEETHEART.
Daughter of Defendant, Who Was
Sweetheart of Deceased, Gives
Details of the Tragedy.
(By Jno. 4. Aull.)

Special to The Herald and News.
Laurens, Oct. 3..-Charged with
murder in the killing of j. Louis Will
hanson, J. Henry Garrison was con-
victcd in the court of sessions here on
Friday Of manslaughter, the jury
which convicted him recommending
him to the mercy of the court. Judge
Memminger overruled the motion for
q new trial, and sentenced Garrison
to serve two years in the State peni-
Tertiary or on the public works Of
Laurens county.
The trial Of Garrison, resulting
from one of the saddest tragedies ever
enacted in Laurens county, ere lted
great interest throughout South
Carolina. Young Williamson, the de-
ceased, was a guest at the Garrison
home at Gray Court, as a visitor to
Miss Mary Garrison, daughter of j.
Henry Garrison. Young Williamson
and Miss Garrison were engaged 10
be married. Williamson was Il prom
inent young farmer of Bethesda, near
Rock Hill, in York county. He he.
came acquainted with Mis-; Garrison
while she was teaching school near
his home, and their acquaintance rip
ened Into love and the engagement -
be married. On the nigh! Of the tra-
gcdy which ended young Williamson
life ANA liaccd Garrison under inaict-
ment for murder, Williamson and
Miss Garrison were in the family
parlor. According to her testimony
he was trying to take liberties with
her over her protest. Garrison, who
stated that his suspicious had been
aroused by what he hal heard from
t!,c parlor, went into Tie yard TO
the window of the parlor, tallin: his
shot gun with him. IIc said that he
looked through the window and his
conslusion was that Williamson was
trying to take improper advantage of
his daughter, as he expressed it. He
said that Williamson back was to-
move. whcreupon Williamson faced
him and he shot him, the load taking
effect in Williamson $ bowels, and re-
suling in death three hours later.
feet That he did not know of William
sons engagement of his daughter.
Mrs. Garrison stated that she knew
the young people were engaged to be
h,,i hot e., ,l,n 1,,n
her husband did not know Of it. Miss
Garrison's testimony was to the same
effect along this line.
Garrison attorneys have given no.
tice Of intention to appeal to the su
premc court, and pending the appeal
the defendant was granted bond in
the sum Of $1,000. the same amount
under which he was held before the
trial.
Solicitor Cooper was assisted in the
prosecution by Mr.. p. II. Nelson, of
Columbia. The defendant was rep
resented by Mcssrs. Ferguson &
FeathcrStone and Richcy & Richcv, of
the local bar. There was harn
fight by the attorneys on each side,
and the arguments to the jury were
able Mcssrs. Nelson and Cooper ad-
dressed the jury for the State, and
McssrS. Fcathcrstonc and Richcy for
the defendant. Mr.. Nelson opened
Fer The State. and was followed hv
McSSrS. Richcy and Fcathcrstonc. for
defendant. the arguments of each Of
lh"Sr %rnllrmcn brin" unusually
strong. Solicitor Cooper closed for
t." State in powerful argument.
The ease was cHllrI on Thursday
/ mNrni"%. and the followin" jury was
S:"'""i2h: J.. y. Bailrr, H. Il. Pryor. T.
T.. }l!l1Nl. j. W. Abrams. Sam l.. SAX
on, N. p. B"hnnbaueh, G. G. Young.
.'Mn. \. Abrrcrombir. C. II. Finley.
r. II. Young. \. |. Mahaffcv. r.. J.
Layton. Mr.. Il. J. Layton was ap-
pointed foreman Of the jury.
DR.. c. f.. Rodgers was the first wit
ness called for the State. He tcsti-
fled that about II 'clock Mr.. Gar
rison camc to his home and asked him
if he had any surgical Instruments.