The Cecil Whig., 1908-01-18
GEORGE n. BLHFF.
Solicitor FOR the Plaintiff.
Order Capitalization
William z. Bradfield, Plaintiff.
VS..
Ideania a. Bradiield, Defendant,
In the Circuit Court for Cecil County
in Equity, No. a7sb

The object oi this suit is 70 procure
a decree Oi divorce vInculo m2tri-
moni of the plaintiff from the defend
ant. and for the awarding of the guar
dianshp and custody of the children
OF the plaintiff and defendant, to the
plaintiff and for general relief
The bill states:--
/. That on or about the 26th lay q \
March. in The year 1900. the plaintiff
was married 10 the defendant whose
name was ldeana \ Boyd, At The
town oi North East, in Cecil County,
in the State 81 Maryland, By Rev l..
x. Miller Of that place,
2. That since said marriage, your
| orator who was locomotive fireman
and is now an engineer, on the Phila'
dclphia. Baltimore and Wash gioa
Railroad. and the defendant, have re-
sided in the States oi Maryland. Della
ware and Pennsylvania, according TO
the schedule OF the runs ~ the plaln-
tT on said railroad. and that the plain
| tiff has resided for more than twoj
/ years next preceding this applica;ioT
for divorce. AZ the town Of P.rryvlld
| in Cecil County aforesaid and that ~
defendant and the two children herd
mentioned reside in the City OF W~
minpton. m the State % Delaware, ~
elsewhere. beyond the Jurisdiction "
said Court
4 That ever since said marriage the
plaintiff has behaved himsel. as a
chaStc. faithful and aGccii0nste hus-
band towards his said vile.
1. That two children have hcon born
Of said marriage one oi whom Is six
Isecn and the other fourteen years -
age and both ~ whom rs well as the
defendant, have been provided with a
! home and support by the plaintiff to
the time Of this application.
: That Tor several years pr er 10 the
month oi March IN the year 1907, the
plaintifT was led to suspect from The
conduct. language and associations Il
the defendant. aud from run'o-s which
reached him. that she was untrue TO
him and had become an unchaste
woman. but the plaintiff was averic to
believing her guilty 81 marital TN
faithinlness ard hoped that h'' snspic-
ions. as well as said rumors, were
/ without foundation. That in the month
II ~ March. IN the year 1907, the plain
Il tiff. 70 his deep modification al re-
: eret. discovered that his suspicious
we're well founded and that the dc
. fcndant had, since her said marriage
and within a few years prior to said
, month oi March. 1907. committed
adultery (and sd the plaintiff 1'cge.s
!. IN the Cny ~ Wilmington aforesaid
where the plaintiff and his family re
j sided
n &. That the plaintiff has not reside'
Sor cohabitcd with the defendant sine
Glsaid discovery and has not hithert'
-. .made application for divorce. hopini
UMthat the defendant might be rcclaime
but oi this there is now no hope.
,,lr II is thereupon this sixteenth day {
aMaIanuarv. in the year 1908. ordered thu
,he plaintiT. by causing a copy Of thl
order 10 be inserted in some news
Hoancr published in Cecil County afor'
said. once in each ~ four successis
weeks before the 10Th day Of Fehr'
vr,rv. 1908. give uoiice to the said ahscl
icfcnd.nt ri the object and stihstaii;
n this bill warming her TO appear
his Court IN person or nv solicitor. {
Cur before the al day oi March next,
how cause. IL anv she has, why d
rec OUGHT not ia pass rs prayed.
r MANI Y. DRENNEN. Clcr
True Corv--Test:
ons MANLY DRENNEN Cler