The Cecil Whig. [volume] (Elkton, Md.) 1841-current, 1908-02-08
GEORGE "a. BLHFE,
Solicitor for fhe PIainfiff.
Order Of Publication
William T.. Bradicld, Plaintiff.
VS..
Idcania \. Bradfeld, Defendant.
In the Circuit Court for Cecil County
in Equity, No. $3.50.

The object OF this suit is to procure
decree OF divorce yinculo matri.
monii oil the plaintiff from the defend
ant, and for the awarding OF the guar
dianship and custody OF the children
OF the plaintiff and defendant, to the
plaintiff and for general relief
The bill states:--
/. That on or about the Goth day Of
March, in the year 1890, the plaintiff
was married to the defendant whose
name was Ideania 4. Boyd, at the
town OF North East, in Cecil County,
in the State OF Maryland, by Rev. T..
X. Miller Of that place
;. That since said marriage the plain
tiff, who was locomotive fireman
and is now an engineer, on the l'hila-
dclphia. Baltimore and Washington
Railroad and the defendant, have re-
sided in the States OF Maryland. Della
ware and Pennsylvania. according to
the schedule of the runs oi the plain
tin on said railroad, and that the plain
wears next preceding this application
for divorce, at the town OF Psrryville.
in Cecil County aforesaid and that the
defendant and the two children here n
mentioned reside in the City OF WI
mington. in the State OF Delaware, or
elsewhere. beyond the jurisdiction OF
said Court,
3. That ever since said marriage the
plaintiff has behaved himsel.. rs a
chaste. faithful and aifectinratc hus.
band towards his said wife.
4. That two children have been born
OF said marriage. one OF whom is six
teen and the other fourtc III years 81
age and both OF whom as we'll as the
defendant, have been provided with a
home aud support hy the plaintiff, to
the time oi this application.
5. That for several years prior to the
month OF March, in the year 1907, the
plaintiff was led to suspect from the
conduct, language and associations #
the defendant and from rur,D-s which
reached him, that she was untrue 10
him and had become an unchaste
woman, but the plaintiff was averse to
believing her guilty OF marital TN
iaithiulness and hoped that his suspic-
ions, az we'll as said rumors. were
without foundation That in the month
OF March, in the year 1907, the plain
tiff, to his deep modification all re-
greet, discovered that his suspicious
were we'll founded and that the de-
PENDANT had. since her said marriage
and within a few years prior to said
month OF March. 1907, committed
adultery (and so the plaintiff allcgcs)
in the City OF Wilmington aforesaid,
where the plaintiff and his family re-
sided
6. That the plaintiff has not resided
or cohabitcd with the defendant since
said discovery and has not hitherto
made application for divorce, hoping
that the defendant might be reclaimed
but OF this there is now no hope
II is thercupon this sixteenth day OF
January, in the year 1908, ordered that
the plaintiff. by causing a copy OF this
order 10 be inserted in some news
paper published in Cecil County afore-
said, oncc in each OF four successive
weeks before the 10Th day of Fcbru-
airy, 1908, give notice to the said absent
defendant of the object and substance
OF this bill, warning her 10 appear in
this Court in person or bv solicitor. on
or before the 3d day Of March next. to
show cause. II any she has. why de-
cree ought not to nass as prayed.
MANLY DRENNEN, Clerk.
True Copy--Test:
MANLY DRENNEN. Clerk.
jar isit