The Washington herald. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1906-1939, 1908-02-05
DISTRICT COURTS.
Court of Appeals.

i - -
All present
| Patent appeals:
No. CO., In re application Of s. E. Hertst I'M
/ porting C0muny; decision u Commissioner Of Pat
ents affirmed Opinion by Mr.. Justice RObb. AT.
Z Umgs J.. s. Bacon and H. Mans-farfax
| BaysTd and W s. Ruckmsn
! No, 42s In Te application Of Peter r. Warren
/ same, Opinion by Mr. Justice Robb Attorneys.
/ " 4. Mcleod, Henry Caller. ". A. Copeland
aEd g. T. Dlke-faiTtax BayaFd and W. s. Rucs-
man.
| No 49, in re- application of Thomas A. Edison
/ same. Opinion hy NIr Chief Justice Shepard At
t0mgs i. l.. DyeT-FaIfax Bsyard and r. a.
Tenant.
| 10 49, In re Crescent Typewriter Company
I same. Opinion is Mr. Justice Van Orsdel- Attor-
/ Heys. II. A. Dodge. A. Tenant
no. 81 Braunstein vs. Holmes; same. Opinion
4 i7 Mr. Justice Van Orsdel Attorney. c. II.
/ H0Hs0u.
No as In re application Of Paul Emil Droop;
same. Opinion by Mr. Justice Robb. Attorneys.
4 J. l.. Norris Eff A. Tenant
/ no. So. The Peter Schoenhofen Brewing Com
Dany vs. The Maitine Company; same. Opinion by
Mr. Justice Van 0fsdeL Attorneys. 7. A. Banning
4 II. r. Edison
No. A. J. McEmenny's Son rs. Kew Iberia
Extract Il T01asc3 Company; decision Of COMMITS
souer Of Patents reversed Opinion hy Mr.. Justice
l.obh A,tome55, Melville Church and ]. B..
NO ~. The Natural Food Company vs.. VIII
lalas; same. Opinion hy Mr. Justice RObb Attof-
nel5. H. 4 S-mO1T-i allsce fGre-le
No 1885, Edwin W. ", Griffin ct a. vs.. United
/ states eX rel Thomas i. Le Cuyer; opinion u
lower court affirmed. Opinion ty Mr.. Justice Robb
Attorneys i. H. Thomas and II. =. Blair-L. A.
BAILEY and H. T. Davis.
Patent appeal No $50. Andrew Mclean Company
vs. Adams Manufacturing Company motion % dis
r5nse with printing part Of transcript submitted by
BIZ C. j. Hedues ln support az motion ard bg
Ars X r. johnson m opposition thereto Attgr-
Tass. 4. Vs. Barber and G. J. Hedrick-B. r. John
No. 1853. DistI..t o. Columbia vs.. Fauan: death
q Ls--. T. Esusu suggested and J. Walter Far
raa- aamiui-frrGr made tie party appellee Oh
motion q Dir. ". H. sh0ies. a counsel for Ep-
peIae. Attorneys. j. H. Thomas and H. T.
Blil-J. J. Darlington and ". H. Sholes.
No. ie- Bal Ct as. IS. Washington Railway
and Electric Company; mandate stayed until fur
thzr order GA motion Of Alr. Melville Church, q
counsel i1l appellant.
no. 1873. Garfield 's. United States er rel Tan
uer 40 o.; passed until March. Ati1mers, 2. T.
Sanford and ~ r. Hau
80 Isa GARFIELD IS. United states Il rel
FsuEau; same. AttorDers same.
No. 1853. Iaciarland ct al vs.. United States
OK gcL Ruszell. tie retirement e John BiEfls for
tae appellants herein suEgrJsd and Jay J. Morrow,
his successor. in Office made party appellant IN
his stead. on motion a llr T. II. STEPHENS q
counsel Tor aHprLiluts. Attorneys Z. II. Thomas
and L. H. STEPHENS
ID. l,2 Dams vs.. United States; passed. At
tameFs- A. s. WcIthi--tol-D. ~ Baker.
80. l--5- Van OrsIeU U.s. Washington Tines
Company, passed Tor settlement. Attorneys G.. /.
Era.e-Lam6erJ & Mclean.
30. IH D5bbius vs.. Thomas argued by Mr Leo
simmons for appellant, submitted jy 3ir r. O..
D5aadzal 60. appellee, Att5meE', Leo simmons
J.. g.. Bola.fs5a.
Nos I-5sI-63 King vs. Curtin. submitted. Attos-
-.r. j. a. Jolus0u-E. 4. Jones.
N1s i5e-llla Clnsaul 90 al vs.. CumTius. &c. /;