The Birmingham age-herald. [volume] (Birmingham, Ala.) 1902-1950, 1908-01-07

r. Edmundson, Sam A. Benton, J. l..
Jesse, E. S. Moore, Lee Merrill, Sam
kohn, John fuller. John Lewis. job n
e. Fuqua w. r. Speakman, II. O.
Robinson, Frank Nelson Jr, Fred
Brucker j. S. Arnold, d. N. Smith,
Hewitt Thompson J. T. Rumley, Alonzo
Smith, J. Gudel. s. J. Johnson, J. N.
Gilbert, Charles j. Denton, George e.
Mohns, Frank r. Foster, c. Fl. Colvin,
II. culverhouse, J. F. Fair, w. C. Carey.
M. ]. Feibleman, w. j. McGraill f. S.
Bobo. F. E. Brooks, S. E. Mcconnell.
Ben Smoker, ]. T. Harrell, John Dig
gins, John Brooks and ]. A. Roberts.
In Judge Nesmith's division the case
of Lula Boyd vs. Birmingham Railway,
Light and Power company was passed
until this morning.
Before the adjournment of the court
a consent judgment of 500 was rem
dered in the case OF Pearl Regain VS..
Birmingham Railway, Light and Power
company.
In the case of the Title Guarantee
and Trust company VS.. Woodward Iron
company a consent Judgment was rem
dered for $1,000. 1t was for the death
of ]. w. McCune.
Chancellor A II. Benners dismissed
the case of Felicia Tedeski VS.. Louis
Burger, Ruby Davis el AL yesterday
morning.
Only one new case was filed in the
city court yesterday. The Terre Haute
Brewing company filed suit against w.
T. Terry ct AL, claiming $1,000 for al
legged breach of condition of bond.
Cases Set For Today.
Tn Judge Lanes division of the circuit
court the following docket is set for trial
today:
A. d. Brown VS.. Louisville and Nash
vile Railroad company. damages; Sam
uel H. Bush VS.. st. Louis and San Fran
cisco Railroad company. damages; j. +.
Smith VS.. Birmingham Railway, Light
and Power company, damages, special;
Carrie Smith vs. Birmingham Railway,
Light and Power company damages.
Railway. Light and Power company.
damages, special.
In Judge Coleman's division of the cir
cult court the following docket is set for
trial today:
Helen Stone VS.. Lee Stone, assumpsit;
Mary Holly VS.. Garden & Marcus. dam
ages; Thad e. Murphy VS.. E. III. Hol
der, assumpst; ]. A. Hudson VS.. Amer
lean Cast Iron Pipe company damages;
John jackson VS.. s. s. s. & /. Co., dam
ages.
The following cases are set. for trial
in the first division of the city court
today, Judge Ferguson presiding:
Ensley company vs. Ensey Pratt High
land company, assumpsit Empire Print
ing and Box company VS.. Worlds Best
Soap company. appeal by defendant; B.
C. Pickett vs. A. G. Ross, assumpsit;
Gray Dudley Hardware company vs.
Carolina Portland Cement company, as
sumpsit j. w. Hawkins VS.. Mitchell
Lumber company, assumpsit; Peoples
Savings Bank and Trust company VS..
John c. Haskell ct al, assumpsit: w. j..
Oliver VS.. w. s. Neal, attachment: First
National Bank of Gadsden VS.. William
Vaughn assumpst; Charles Transfer
company VS.. Mrs. S. C. Malone. dam
ages.
In the second division of the city court.
Judge Nesmith presiding. the following
cases are set for trial today:
William w. Price W Birmingham Rail-
way, Light and Power company. dam
ages w. w. Wilson VS.. Kilby Frog and
Switch company. damages; Cecil Eugene
Roger, pro ami, VS.. Birmingham Rail-
way, Light and Power company, dam
ages: Sam Win John Vs. Birmingham
Rec" mpany ct al, damages; Emma