The Charles Mix new era. (Wagner, Charles Mix County, S.D.) 1???-1911, 1908-04-03

~ - - ~ revoAd - torsign cooperation hn prsyide 60
apon when ~ 2soes: suA : .ann. nay 3 ns.sd SERVES
~, ,ess =: 80 | ra sssss sal !. .. ,sss. T. Z. .p sa.sssss s s..ss n, - s,sis ssss
- record. until revoked Or supenedsd b. sone ct of the Company
saa. i : for = purpa~ Of enabling resident. q this state 70 sae
foreign coFPonasos n this Jurisdiction No benefit results to the cor
sirsuua.ne- 4 : ~ ~h< policy Of the law thst whom ones appointed
- mns rI.,s the appointee for The benedt u the public until the
- Aii.sulsr co.pany that sitter October ], 1906. he would trans.ct
|.e noe busans. = any nature for i The matter Of The revocation u
svsrioeaed b. IT, Company for which the Senator could in no wise be
vsaId 10, make N even remotely connected with Ire legal Is su.iDen =
q - Fcsd Re -. - more is representative on that account than are
|aosiees r required = b. posted. Governor Crawford knows this and
= !. xul.y q eais.nery when he attempts to make capital out Of II.
-. : general attorney for the entire state. the Milwaukee has mot
bsfost The snshp1. l.w went into effect. the Milwaukee had, at almost
very county saf ~ the counties where It's line ran, q legal Representa-
s.s.ys sho ~. sssn = annual pas. and was paid in addition for all
l.pss--a...,'ss i Ussa, NJ. Z Z ErisI.sn".n aeaorsd 1 Insurgents sa sa:
- 'srniIhon, Col Joley; At Yankton-hold your breath!-Gamble
chosen by ". Crawford in 1901 . the one to work with him for five
yean = "Asninefens 4 ne can succeed in working his way through the
+ I : : srmr : - . r.lyosd attorney how long doe. it take to e.
s m.. g e. peniisat taief But With Kttrsdee it is different Ae.
hsve returned Tn governor ~. that Kittrrdee made no speech On
= rsaroI. Mnsenensiy he Is : tool Of the railways The senator
nate speerha& TIE SENATOR did not make oue-but h. VOTE, S u for ~. u~
e : pretty god fellow Who votes right. The governor has not
Always voted right = we have proven 10 you
WHOM WOULD YoU TRUsf
We ak You To decide whether it il safer to trust ! m vho has rev.r
brukfn : pledge than one who has many times. The governor claims
u credit for everything the last legislature did that VA rood Whvf
1upp0nnK = good man were governor and the M iority in either
houne ueEe bad where would he bef The good things that cor from !
Legislative body come from the body itself and mot from a detachment
thsf hunts up old bills and gets them introduced % a to make q record
upon what he has killed
The starving man may steal and reform: the man who slays his fell
~ man - the heato st passion may become 4 good citizen: the drunk
and msy oe redeemed but the man you trust with an important mission
md VINO 6efrays you to your enemy is past redemption this side the
pe.riy gates lie should never be tempted by being again entrusted
4 = better for him, better for you. that he be denied q n opportunity
e adn q ns m'qnfy. Again, the example is had Let Your sons and
Daughters learn that i Is 70 those whose past life is consistent with good
nofah and good citizenship that the rewards Of confidence and trust
.e due: that when one once harters AWAY his claim to trustworthiness
= mnM forever bear the ercss Il entails; that it is unsafe to rehabii-
win me implements Of power. any. who. in times which tried men 5
oaf1 proved themselves lacking in patriotism. virtue and wisdom. These
E.ans t.t .e drawn from the brief history Of our young common
ussHh should fmpei ~ to act wisely and not be moved by momentary
p. .:nm e immediate interests either Of our own or Of others To the
csaazen q what moment Is It that Crawford desires to dispIace another
mrossn = lmpnlae Of rage because be ws not consulted ) to who
saouid = postmaster. g marshal or what not What moment Is il to the
ma@s enAt Crawford y resentful, Jealous, avarciousf What the GOOD
@It1en wants 20 know y what sort Of = man this ID who is CRYING s.stop
wnen ne hAs upon his record many times many telltale scars
hememoer maf Schmitz the mayor of San Francisco. was q reformer
ne peopae were not 70 blame for trusting him once. Would they be
naned = my trusted him againf Schmitx had no record to start with
~ simply relied upon hh word-his promises. Crawford had no re-
eGa q Harroad- TIE people then took him II his word. Schmitx
leoAd - pcopk- What did Crawford dot Dom be misled. caioled
- hoodwinksd Answer from his record