The Detroit times., 1908-09-21
Foraker Brings
His Party Ont On
One Campaign Issue
Ne Case Also shows Judge Taft's
Position On That Issue to
Be All Wrong and Mr..
Bryan's Right.

#I svans nans hard-pressed for a talking point
long ago political country
Bryan has long acknowledged that while he believed
have been the solution for conditions which existed at
the proposed that practical the
means of bringing about equal distribution OF the
M wealth Of the country
He pledged himself only by Demo
stc platform contains but also by what it omits which ne-
atey the from consideration question
issue this year.
What then is object opposition going
of the Democratic platform for topic which has bearing
& whatever upon any issue contained in it?
Does their go they either fearful
strength principles the weak
of those of their party?
they attempt keep present issues
u in the background
the latter end sought will they
plsh while representative of their party in the United
party being exposed having been
under the Standard Oil Co., the between Senator
B. Foraker of Ohio, John d. Archbod ghthand OF
the reveal Foraker to have been?
Foraker Of thou
sands of dollars from the Standard Oil Co.
He quickly with his defense, which that the let
passed client and counsel
in the employ of the company its legal Representatives
develops quickly with his de-
for put his foot into cieverly laid trap.
being held back and these
signed by Archbold and written in while Foraker was
In the senate, reading:
ss' ei asss "a:
Another letter written Broadway dated Feb
from Archbold to Foraker, read:
nsa, se"s.ri to write y0s wT re the amend sSs ses
e a: a,s aoa unlawful restraint: and
Hes" him. - -
I = i
ss ss ssl 70" sr
with kind regards. your. very truly. o. ARcisoLo
In the face of this convincing proof that Foraker
man of the Standard legal artillery of the
of and while laws
being introduced with view curbing the power OF all
trusts, Judge Taft quick repudiate Foraker.
$50 soon Toledo reconciliation too).
To repudate for Judge Taft
7 take
But Judge consistently Foraker for accept
ing money the thing in the
party which the presidency and continue
stand the nominee of that party?
One of the issues Republican spebnders
ectng upon while holding the free
which the publicity OF campaign
contributions
This is one of the William Jennings Bryan
& responsible in this campaign
1t is an upon Republican the Democratic
presidency agreed principle their differ
being Mr. Bryan the contributions made public
election Mr. Taft would them made public after
election when the take warning
the of their contributions
preferences of the nominees would work
Il out in the Foraker
Judge preferred in his proposition that the
until after election
prefer in the of contributions
prefer the individual for the principle is
IS acty the
Foraker having into the after
runin president Brownsville shooting stood
lire for doing his share toward
harmony divided Ohio keeping Negro line this
vote being friendly him and against Taft
of Foraker but for this involuntary publicity would
Of United States obligated the
Oil Co, and Taft would
& man to him back.
But Republican make assurances to Foraker
NV IA the face Taft compelled throw
him
And publicity of contributions before election
Bryans position that party obligated to the pocket
books of the trust likewise shown before is too late
and such party kept of power.
Mr. BRYAN isn't dealing in this campaign
II which he and his stand that he
:. fecoguizes and IL afraid to discuss.
Taft the Republican party have evidenced little in
common with the matt ARE issues