Bisbee daily review. [volume] (Bisbee, Ariz.) 1901-1971, 1908-03-19

other crowd was on top and he be-
lieved in giving back the same medi-
cine which had been administered to
he and his friends two years ago.
Here MeReynolds again took the
fioor and expressed regret at tne dis
position to refer to things past and
gone ami doubted il such a DISPOSE
ton could lead to tle welfare of the
Republican party in Cochise county
in the future.
Mr.. Thomas again came forward in
support of his motion and declared
that the committee was better Re
publican representation of the Repub-
lican party of Cochise county than
could be obtained as the result of
primary election at which probably
one-third OF the voters would be
Democrats.
Mr.. McNair spoke in favor of the
Thomas motion and took the remark
able ground that the committee had
never had any legal notice Of the ac-
ton of the territorial committee, not
witbstanding the fact that the men,
Der OF the territorial committee from
Cochise couny, who was present at
the committee meeting In Tucson,
had read the call of the committee
and was here standing sponsor for its
correctness
Chairman Kirk made a second
plea for regularity in following the
plan named by the territorial COM
mittee, stating that he had always
favored primaries, as that mode al
ways reached the people to the ex-
tent of giving them an opportunity to
express their wish in political matters
On vote being taken Kirk and
McReynolds voted against the Thomas
motion and everybody else voted for
it.
Selecting the Delegates.
After the vote on the motion which
provided for the election of the dele
gates by the county committee the
only thing left was the naming of
the thirty delegates and simple plan
was easily agreed upon, or rather ii
was carried out without being agreed
upon.
c. n Overlook made a motion pro-
viding for committee of five for the
purpose of submitting q plan for the
election of the thirty delegates On
this committee C. A. Overlook, G. S. !
Thomas, E. A. Folsom, j. F. Crowley
and John Gardner were appointed by
the chair. After that a recess was
taken to allow the committee time to
report a plan.
When the committee brought in its |
report it proved to be a list OF the
thirty delegates to which the county /
was entitled Mr., Crowley submitted
the report of the committee and took
occasion to say that it was subject
to any change in the personnel OF the
delegation which the whole committee
might desire.
Fie delegates named in the report
Of the committee were as follows:
Bisbee-W. P. McNair, DR.. c. J..
Caven, Sam Verran. c. n. Thomas, ].
e. Morrison. R. A. Kirk. Lewis Hunt,
n. M. Woods, H. w. Aiken.
Douglas-CI A. Overlook. F. T.
Dorr, James Speed, Albert Stacy, e
j. Huxtab1e.
LoweIl-Hoyal A. Smith, E. p.
Moore. H. R. Wiles.
Tombstone-M. H. Hoar, II z
Berner, A. H. Gardner.
Presentation Fairlee, Peter Jen-
sen.
Curtis-L. r. White.
FIT. Huachuca-W. S. Mcknight
Gleeson-John Gleeson.
Naco-E. A Folsom.
Paradise-Renwick White.
Pearce-A. Y Smith.
Poois-John Pool.
Wilcox-J. F. Crowley.
Upon motion the executive commit
zee was authorized to make the ap-
,ortionment for the delegates for the
county convention next fall after
which the convention adjourned.