The Robesonian. [volume] (Lumberton, N.C.) 1870-current, 1908-12-10
ROBSON sUPERIORCOURT.
A Two-Weeks' Term in Session
and Many Cases Have Been
Disposed of-No cases of

Disposed of-No cases of
Especial Importance.
A two-weeks' term of Robson
Superior Court for the trial of
civil cases has been in session
since Monday morning, Judge J.
Crawford Biggs, of Durham,
presiding. No cases of especial
importance have come up, but
many cases have claimed the at
tention of the court and have
been tried or otherwise disposed
of.
The following cases have been
continued, by consent and other
wise: In Re will of David Pur-
nell e counts; Neill Barfield
vs. Leonard Stone ct al; Jackson
Locklear VS. Simeon Billiard; w.
O. Edmund vs. town of Lumber
ton; A. C. Bethune, trustee, vs.
Peele Bros; American Laundry
Machinery Co. vs. Ira B. Town
send ct al; Clyde McCallum vs.
M. A. Buie; Dora Ward and
husband VS. A. w. Mclean ct al,
Exrs.; Claus Shear Co. vs. Nc
Cormick & Rogers; Jeptha D.
Gibson vs. R. S. Dixon ct Tx;
Geo Bennett VS. Laura Bennett
(divorce); J. W. Ingold vs. Nc
LeOd and wife; J. H. Hart vs.
Mary L. Hart (divorce); Mar
shall Horn VS. Alex. Horn; A. H.
Mcleod VS. Alex. Sprunt; Mali
chi LOcklear ct ais VS. Biddie
Locklear ct ais; Jas. Nichols VS.
Noel Townsend.
Divorces have been granted in
the following: Lou Kitty Corley
vs. John COrley; Wade H. Sealey
VS. Annie Jane Sealey; ]. C. Nc
Kenzie VS. Chattie Mckenzie.
The following have been dis
missed: Henry We'll and broth
ers vs. J. Bostick ct al; Union
Central Life ms. Co. ct ais VS.
H. A. Townsend and wife and
others; D. Ivey, Admir-, vs. A. C.
L. Ry.; McKinnon Co. vs. S. A.
L. Ry.; Beaufort County Lum-
Der Co. vs. McDiarmid-W Williams
Lumber Co.; Baugh & Son VS.
w. S. Cobb and wife.
S: E. Britt VS. McDiarmid-
Williams Lumber Co. plaintiff
RECEIVERS of defendant $3.50 as
damages on account of the
burning of timber through negli
gence of defendant; O. NJ. Britt
vs. same company for timber
burned, $3.50; B. F. Mclean VS.
H. c. McNair. ejectment-com-
promise agreed upon during pro-
cess of trial; Luther Bracy VS.
J. H: Mcneil, Admir-; Annie
Jane Bracy, vs. same; Esther K.
Bracy VS. same-order making
Malloy Bracy and others parties
defendant and allowing 60 DAYS
to answer; Marion Iron Works VS.
Brown Shaw Lumber Co.
plaintiff adjudged legal owner of
all the machinery and fixtures
now in possession of J. T. Bry-
ant and described in complaint;
Pembroke Guano Co. VS. R. C.
and S. R. Townsend plaintiff
RECEIVERS 81, $3.50, amount due on
notes; A. M. Breeze and D. A.
Mccormick VS. S. A. L. Ry.,
breech of contract on melons
plaintiffs receive $50; Kate Nor.
ment, general guardian of VIM.
W. and Beulah Blount Norment
, vs. J. {. and Angelina Purcell
plaintiff RECEIVERS $21O.7 70; Worth
Floyd VS. F. L. Blue, receiver Of
Ashpole Lumber Co., referred t.
c. B. Skipper as referee; Rayn
ham Mercantile Co. VS. VIM Cal
der, referred to E. J. Britt a:
referee; R. R. Barnes vs. Thomas
II. Hardin and Hybert Hardin
plaintiff RECEIVERS of Thos. H
Hardin $75 with interest: Nc
, Cormick & Paul VS. W. R. Nc
Neill--plaintiff RECEIVERS $29.1O.
Non-suit was entered as to tn,
r following: R. w. Livermore VI
5. A. L. Ry.; United Lumber Co
2 vs. s. A. L.; Southern Exchang,
! Go. vs. Mccormick, Smith & Co,
s 5. Z. Willis VS. w. M. McQueel
/ and others; Southern Oil Co. v
D. B. Quick; Geo. Mason v
= Everett Bass and wife; Johl
! Leak vs. S. A. L. Ry.; S. 3
r Rozier vs. Owen Ward and wife.
A number af judgments hav,