The Grenada sentinel. [volume] (Grenada, Miss.) 1868-1955, 1908-04-18
SPIRITISM
CIalrvoyance.

AuCu1O ohu VI NbSoiI 60
the banks, suddenly disappeared, and,
with him, about $4,000.
Being in the city at the time,
persuaded a young lady to allow me
to hypnotic her in order that she
might become ~clairvOyant, and, there
by, find the whereabouts of the man
he being known to both of us.
She consented, but informed me
that she did not believe in either hyp-
notisrn or ~clairvoyance, and that no
body could hypnotic her, as many at
tempts had been made and all had
failed.
/ encouraged her to express her
self freely; in fact, helping her TO
unload her objections. When this
was lone she became passive Ca nee
-Ssary condition) and in less than
two minutes Ono longer time is eve
required with a good subject) she was
SO thoroughly hypnotized that she
passed readily into a ~clairvoyant con-
dition.
She went (c~lairvoyantly) to his
home. She saw him quietly leave his
home in the night q say saw him,
as that is a c~lairvoyant expresSiOn).
She saw him board a train, saw him
leave the train at Detroit, Mich.
At this point l interrupted her. l
said: Il think he has crossed the riv-
er into Canada" She informed me
to the contrary. l mention this for
the purpose of impressing upon you
the fact previously expressed, viz, a
clairvoyant is not influenced by a sug-
gestiOn as is n who is merely hyp-
Noticed and does not pass beyond that
stage.
To esume. She said: Il see him
go up Jefferson avenue (she had
never been there). l see him urn
down Woodward avenue, then out
Griswold street, then to the left on
Clinton street, and he is now in a
story-and-a-half house (giving the
number.
Again I interrupted her by asking
her how she knew it was Detroit and
how she knew the names of the
streets. To this she replied (mark
her words: Il move among the
throng, but they know it not. l can
not talk with them, but l can see. /
saw the name of the station and, on
the lamp posts, l read the m Of
the streets; in fact, just the same as
If l were there in body. But l have
not told you all. Listen. He has
shaved off his whiskers and has as
sumed another name"
| asked for the assumed name and
she gave it without hesitancy. The
next day I called on the wife, gave her
a diagram of her husbands move
ments, the number of the house and
his assumed name. She sent a friend
to communicate with him. He found
him without difficulty. He inquired
for him first by his right name, but
was informed that no such person
was there; then by his assumed name.
He was ushered into his presence. He
was, as described, whiskerless.
Truly this was remarkable, and the
more so as a first experience. Was it
telepathy or c~lairvoyance? In this
case, as in the previous one, l am
frank to admit that all the knowledge
obtained may have been GEOGRAPHICALLY
received; but was it?
P~remonitions and Impressions.
All premonitions are impressions,
but all impressions are lot Fremont
lions. An impression may be the fore
casting of a ~pleasurable event; a pre-
is the fOreshadOwing of ap-
preaching danger or evil. 1t does not
follow, however, hat the event fore
is inevitable. The shadow
is merely to warn you of imminent
peril which, if you are wise, you will
divert by needing the warning.
Do not mistake imagination for pre-
monition. All premonitions are intui-
tive, and all intuitions are correct.
Whenever you are in doubt, it is not
intuition; intuition never doubts.
When anyone asks you, What makes
you think SOP and you can answer
with positive assurance, 81 do not
think it, l know it," that is a true i'm
preston on which you may rely.
Is it possible to ~foretell the future?
Only in a limited degree. 1 think that
God, in His all-wise providence, has
dropped the curtain between us and
the future in the general, everyday
affairs of life; but upon certain occas.
ions, as in approaching danger, He
lifts the curtain to give us
fair warning that we may avert hat
which would otherwise prove disas-
How does He acquaint us with this
By a special dispensation of
providence? l think not. God is no
.respecter of persons. That which we
call "soul" is but a spark of the All
Soul. 1t possesses all The 1ctentialL
ties of God Himself, but in a much
lesser degree-in the proportion of
he spark to the whole.
The subjective mind Is the mind OF
he soul; the highest faculty is intui-