The Nome daily nugget., 1908-02-01
DISTRICT COURT
 DAILY MINUTES

that of the defendant by O. n. Cochran. AfAter the jury had been empaneled and sworn on request = T. Jcfreys was permitted to withdraw as counsel in the case and the rasr was conducted by q. n Cochran oa behalf of tho de- fendants
 On motion plaHttin was allowed ta take voluntary nm-suit as to the third eass" "f action as to the assigned elaiu af W. S EyHearsaa far taa and interest thereon
 W. J Rowc. the plaintiffs. and <. q Gale were each sworn and testified or behalf of the plaintin Plainum offered in evidence assignment ef claim uf Sed- don Transportation Co. t6 w. J. Rove dated Aug 25 1906 for sS7. which was admitted without objection and marked Plaintiffs Exhibit A and p1aiutin rezts Defendants Case:
 Defendants read u evidence the de- positions of Louisa SeHaer and wm Seliucr and defendants and both sides rcst and the testimony closed and the cass Was argued to In, iniy hv W. \ Gilmore for plaintiff and bs o. D Goeh- ran for defendants. and thereafter the jury were instructed hy the court orally exccvtiens to which We're taken by counsel for defendants iR the presenee of Che Jury and before they retired and at Il 4o m the july retired h con sider of their verdict in charge of the hailids Lawrence and Hnfrich. who were first duly sworn and court ad- jaurncd until i.45 D m. subject tu re- convene to receive the verdict af the jurY in the above case.
 Rowe vs. Sclincr et al Al r. o'clock non the jury came into open court. all being present. and returned the follow ing verdict
 In the District Court for the District
 "f Alaska. Second Division.
 W J. Rowe plaintiff. es Vim Selincf Louisa Selincr and e A. Young. de- fendants. No l5S3-Verdict
 ew. the jury in the above entitled action. duly lmranelled and sworn. do find verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against the dcfndauts Louisa Sci- liner and (. A. Young tar tho sum nf s2.8ss.50.
 Dated al Nome Alaska this aIsr day of January. 1908
 M. N. Griffith. foreman
 The court directed that the verdict be filed and placed af record and the jury was discharged from further con sidefation of this ease and excused uH- til 1ss45 D. m. to which time court aa- journed.
 t:45 p. m.
 Esre et al vs. stenUeld ct al On motion of John Rustgard defendants wcr granted until tomorrow [" file ox- captions to charge.
 cowden et all Ns. Halla ct al This case came regularly on for trial before the court and jury. A ] Daly and Thos, k shepard aveParing for plain tiffs. and EIwood Bruner and J. Allison Bruncr appearing for the defendants Case reported by Mrs. C. J Nunne steHographcr The motion of defendants to strike from xply to amended an- swer was submitted by NIT Elwooa Bruner without argument and oycrrm- ed by the court
 The jury as empaneled and sworn
 Plaintiffs case was stated tu the Iure by Thos. R. Shepard and that of tho defendants by Elwood Bruncr
 Fred R. Cowden was worn and testi- fled on behalf of plaintiffs. Witncss identified lease from otto HaIla et al 10 Fred R Cowdcn and others which was marked Plaintiffs Identification \. and also assignment of above iease which was marked Plaintiffs Idrntif- cation F.
 Plaintiffs thereafter offered lease from Halla ct al to Cowden ct al. If Golden Bull claim dated Feb. 96 l9o6 which was admitted over objection nf defendants and marked Plaintiffs Ex- hibit A. and then plaintiffs offered iH evidence the assignment of lease above referred to by F. R. cawden to Golden Bull Mining Co. which was objected to by defendants. the decision of the court being reserved until tomorrow morning. The assignment was marked for idcnti- flcation Plaintiffs Identification E.
 Al 4:50 D. m. tine jury was admonish- ed and court adjourned until Saturday February 1. 1908. at 10 a. m
 ASSESSMENT NOTICE.