The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1908-06-11

Park Association; stet; Peddicord-
Hamill
20, Eli and James q. Stanton VS. Gil
cad Broadwater; set for trial July 10th,
1903.
q, Nethkin Coal & Coke Co. VS. J. R.
Pope; put at end of trial docket: Peddi-
cord Hamill.
p, Edward A. Browning VS. Q. A.
Lacy; continued; Peddicord- Pearre &
Dickey.
%, Daniel Mosser VS. Joseph w. Hoge;
continued; Renninger-Hamill
"a, Edward. Frantz VS. William Bow
man; Judgment on rule and consolidated
with No. 26; Renninger & Ofutt-
Hamill.
%, Rowlesburg Grocery Co. VS. Marion
c. Hoye; judgment for $3.50. 80; ReE-
ringer & Offutt Hamill.
rs, Edward J. Frantz VS. William Bow
man; Judgment for plaintiff for $579.28
Renninger & Offutt-Hamill
q, Emma Sharless VS. Osborn Tasker;
action for SANDER; tried before the
court and judgment for the defendant;
Hamill & Semmes Peddicord.
Is, Nelson N. Cupp VS. John H. Con-
neway; continued; Peddicord Hamill.
%. Samuel Lakel VS. Williamsport
Hardware Co.; defendant asked for a
commission to take testimony in Penn
sylvania and West Virginia, and case
continued; Peddicord-Thayer
80. Donald Simpson VS. Arch. Casteel,
ct al; inquisition by jury for 1920.
81. Henry Bernard, ct al, VS. H. Ber-
nard, etc, garnishee; stet; Thayer-
Sincell
%. Mountain Lake Water ard Light
Co.. VS. Mountain Lake Park Associa-
ton; continued; Peddicord-H amill
80. George C. Sturgiss VS. F. 7. Mar
tin; amended declaration and bill Of par
ticulars filed and case continued; Peddi-
cord-Renninger & Offutt.
"a. George c. Sturgiss VS. L. A. Rudi-
Gill; judgment on the rule; Peddicord-
Renningcr & Offutt.
35. Mary E. Pysell VS.. Geo. P. Fitz-
water; tiled before the court; judgment
for the plaintiff; Thayer- Semmes and
Hamiu.
IS. William Emerson VS. Richard Gar
litz; tried before the court and judy
ment for the defendant; Williams
Hamill and Semmes.
81. Mary NJ. Beckman VS. Lincoln Cal
lis; tried before the court and all of
PLAINTIFFS prayers rejected and case to
be argued later; Semmes and Hamill-
Peddicord.
IS. w. C. Huntington VS. K. S. Wolf :;
dismissed; Peddicord Hamil.
80. W. c. Huntington VS. r s. Wolf;
judgment for plaintiff by confession for
$3.50; Pedeicord Hamill.
40. Gilmor S. Hamill VS. Mary Pitts;
judgment on rule; S F. Hamill.
Al. J. c. Orrick & Son Co., VS. Park
Grocery Company; continued; Hamill -
Peddicord.
~. G. S. Hamill, Trustee VS.. G. H.
Prltchard; continued; S. F. Hamill-
Semmes.
43. George H. Chadeayne VS. l.. T..
Yoder; continued on motion of plaintiff;
Renninger & Offutt Peddicord.
Sap,ual Doono A
Dixon; judgment under the rule for
1927 50; Renninger & Offutt Hamill
40. Hanline Brothers VS. Joseph P.
Helbig; judgment under the rule for
S258.90; Hamill
40. The |, Tragu Co., VS.. c. A. Hes
en-; judgment under the rule for $29l 10;
S. F. Hamill Peddicord.
At. Elijah Sines VS. Hanson B. Lewis;
settled; defendant to pay costs; Rem
ringer & Offutt.
As. Philip T. Cartwright VS.. Hanson
B. Lewis; Judgment under the rule for
S639. So; Pedhcord.
40. Philip T. Cartwright VS. H. B.
Lewis and wife; judgment under the
rule for 1882 81; Peddicord.
80 Edward R. Pence VS. Charles D.
Gillaspie; tried before the court and
judgment for defendant for 81, $50 Ia;
Peddicord- Sincell.
81. Gibson & Smith VS. Kendall Lum-
Der Co.. settled on terms; Richmond -
Hamill and Peddicord.
-. Jonathan b. Friend ct al. VS. Thos.
Flanagan ct al; settled; Renninger &
Offutt.
50. N. H. Matthews & Co. VS. Charles
d. Glllaspie; stet; Hamill.
"a. Same VS. same; Hamill.
50. Henry C. Stemple VS. C. D. Gill
laspie; Judgment of condemnation as per
schedule; Thayer Sincell
80. Same VS. same; judgment on rule
for 81, 0SS. 50; Thayer-Sincell
81. Same VS. same; continued; Thayer
-Sincell.
IS. same US same; same counsel
80. Marshall Frankhouser ct al. VS. w
j. Kitzmiller; continued; Renninger G.
Offutt; Thayer and Peddicord.
90. Same vs. same; same counsel.
CRIMINAL TRIALS.