The Cecil Whig. [volume] (Elkton, Md.) 1841-current, 1908-01-18
GEORGE "a. RLHEE,
Solicitor for the Plaintiff.
Order Capitalization
William z Bradheld, Plaintiff.
VS..
Ideania A. Bradiield. Defendant.
In the Circuit Court for Cecil County
IN Equity, No. 27s6

The object 81 this suit is 10 procure
decree oi divorce n vinculo matri-
monii OF the plaintiff from the defend
ant. and for the awarding Of the guar
dianship and custody OF the children
Of the plaintiff and defendant, to the
plaintiff and for general relief.
The bill states:--
7. That on or about the Goth LAY OF
March, in the year 1900. the plaintiff
was married 10 the defendant whose
name was ldeania A Boyd, ut the
town OF North East, in Cecil County.
in the State 81 Maryland, by Rev T.
X. Miller ~ that place
, That since said marriage, your
orator who was a locomotive fireman
and is now an engineer. on the rhila-
dclphia, Baltimore and Wash'Hgtoa
Railroad and the defendant have re-
sided in the States oi Marylanl. Della
ware aud Pennsylvania, according to
the schedule OF the runs II the PLAIN
tif on said railroad. and that the plain
tiff has resided Tor more than two,
wears ncNt preceding this app,catioW
for divorce, a the town II Perryyillcf
in Cecil County Aforesaid and that IN
defendant and the two children herei
mentioned reside in the City of VIZ
mjnctou. N the State az Delaware, 81
elsewhere, beyond ihc jurisdiction ~
said Court
That ever since said marriage the
plaintiff has behaved himscl. as A
chaste faithful and aTcctiorate hus-
band towards his said wife
(. That two children have hrcu born
81 said marriage. one oi whom IS six
teen and the other fourteen "e1rs -
age and both AZ whom rs well as the
defendant. have been provided with
home and support by the plaintiff, to
the time NJ this application.
s That for several wears prov Ia the
month Of March. IN the year 1907. the
plaintiff was led to suspect from the
conduct. language and associations 4
the defendant. and from runw-s which
reached him. that she wa, un;ruc 10
him and had become an unchaste
woman. but the plaintiff was averse to
believing her guilty II marital un
iathiulness ard hoped tlat h.' suspic-
ions. as well as said rumors. were
without foundation That in The month
Of March, in the year 1907, the plain
tiff to his deep modification All re.
crct. discovered that his suspicious
were we'll founded aud that the dc.
PENDANT had. since her said marriage
and within a few years prior TO said
month OF March 1907. committed
adultery land 50 the plaintiff s''cges)
in the City o, Wilmington aforesaid,
where the plaintiff and his family re-
sided.
&. That the plaintiff has not resided
or cohabited viii, the defendant since
said discovery and has not hitherto
made application for divorce. hoping
that the defendant might be reclaimed
but Of this there is now no hope
II Is thereupon this sixteenth day Of
January. in the year 1908. ordered that
the plaintiff, by causing a copy Of this
order 70 be inserted IN some news
paper published in Cecil County afore-
said. ONCE IN each ~ four successive
weeks before the roth day II FebFu-
arv. rne9 give notice TO the said absent
defendant u the object and substance
of this Bin warning her 10 appear in
this Court IN person or bv solicitor. on
or before the sd day OF March next. to
show cause. Il anv che has. why 4 de-
cree OUGHT not 10 mass rs nraved.
NANNY DRENNEN. Clerk.
True Copy-Tcst:
MANLY BREMEN, Clerk.