The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1908-01-26

agreement referred to in the affidavit
e of Mrs. Burns.
2. The cash on hand at the instftu-
f ton of this suit was about $1,000 and
not 100000. and that cash and the pro-
j ceeds of the stocks as above had been
applied toward the payment of the
: following sums. as made necessary by
the compromise agreement: Four sums
5 of $4,000 each to Nancy McStocker,
Marie HUMPHREYS. Carrie Riggs and
: Emmeline Magoon; an attorneys fee
of $4,000 to j. j. Dunno, attorney for
Julia H. Along; an attorneys fee of
$1,000 to w. L. Rawlins, attorney for
certain respondents; a total of attor-
neys' fees of $4,000 to r. w. Breckons
and A. G. NJ. Robertson, attorneys for
Carrie Riggs and Nancy Mcstocker. |
and, for the rest, advances to Mrs. |
Julia Fl. Along for maintenance of |
herself and certain of her children
| other than deponent.
Deponent goes on to DENY having re-
celved any stocks or benefits from his
mother other than already stated T.
Regular statements were furnished by
him to his mother He denies having
asked his brother Henry to stand nv
MIN and proposing to Henry that they
would grab the whole, estate" At no
time had he exercised undue power
over his mother. Ever since the con-
clusion of the compromise he has used
every effort to have its terms enforced.
He contends that the compromise is i
good and effective and has long since /
as matter of conscience and of law. :,
terminated this suit :
Supplementing his former statement, i
he says $4,000 is stilI due by the estate c
out of loan of $4,000 obtained for the 5
of the compromise, and that =
balance. principal and interest. is Sc n
cured as was the original loan by [
pledge of the $500 shares of Eva Plan r
-ation Co. 800 shares of Hawaiian s
sugar Co, 500 shares of Oahu Sugar
20. and 155 shares of Pioneer Mill Co, le
ldined III an exhibit.
Finally. he says he is of the age of \
thirty years. is engaged in the stock IL
business and, since his grad II
lation from Harvard College over three &C
ears ago, has been in business for cl
himself and others. m
MOTION TO STRIKE. W
Castle & Wilmington for Mrs, Along =,
lie motion to strike out certain parts -
+ tAe affidavit of Mrs. Burns. in the -
alters suit against the former and
that motion be not granted then the -.
'Sron6e"t moves TO strik out the =
'hole affidavit. The ground is that the "
oftions in question are impertinent 50
nd scandalous.
DIVORCES. N
Judge Lindsay granted a divorce 10 ri
suchf Yanagi against Yynfchi Yanagi ua
Or desertion. and to Asano Takenaka SCI
Dr. failure TO support her. A s. Hum wi
hreys appeared for both plaintiffs 1
Arma Makia Tommy was granted to
ivorce against Makaf Tommy for ex-
'eme cruelty and failure to provide. tn
. NJ. Watson represented the COM Wa
lainant "a
THE CHAPLIN CASES
Mrs. c. w. Chaplin by her attorney. :
. NJ watson, moves for a. continu sa
nee Of w. c. Weedon's damage suit thi
sainst her until May %. The first les
round Is that having resulted in sill
lStrlai at last term, the case is i'm ms
,operly placed at the head of the call SCI
ldar. Her second ground is that. if pei
eedon's exceptions to nonsuit in the
: case against 9. w. Chanin he s,7g 81,