The Montgomery advertiser., 1907-11-30
 CONCLUDED Arguments Will Begin This Morning. MORE EXPERTS ON THE STAND They Declared Mrs. Bradley Was
 Never Insane. End of Noted Murder Case is Now In sight and Case Win Re
 Given to Jury
 Monday.


 it's all over at last"
 These words were uttered today by Mrs. Anna I. Bradley charged with the murder of former Senator Arthur M. Brown of Utah as she with a smile was led from the court room to the prison van which was to take her back to jail. The presentation of evidence had just been concluded and court adjourned un- til morning when arguments will begin. Justice Stafford announced that an agreement had been reached among counsel for four hours of argument on each side. These will be completed Monday afternoon and Justice Stafford said he would then deliver the charge and give the case to the jury.
 The testimony of the two government insanity experts, pr. Edward H. Brush. of Baltimore. and pr. Ely Smith Jciieffe was the feature of today's proceedings. both these alienists declaring that there was nothing in the record of the case to indicate that Mrs. Bradley was in- sane. Counsel for the defense attempt ed to impeach the testimony of these exports by showing that they had been called for the government and that as a matter of course, they were testify ing in the iaterest of the government.
 
 and declared that they would have tes- tined to the insanity of Mrs Bradley as readily as they testified to her sanity. had they found her to be insane. They were questioned at length and both cited the acts of the defendant. testi- fled to by witnesses as showing her to be sane.
 < Rev. David Utter pastor of the Unl- tarian church cf Denver, Col, who m h rafaprad as the priest" was placed an the stand. He was Mrs. Bradley's pastor in Salt Lake City and testified to con- yersation he had with her In 1905. she saying in effect, according to his testi- n1onY. that Senator Brown would marry her when gun was riaced before hipt, but the p9stor aadsd hssdid not under stand that she proposed shooting him. He rather thought some one else would undertake to force him to marry her.
 Mrs. Bradley was recalled and stated that she had no recollection of such a Conversation. The pastor occupied a seat at her side during most of the day and appeared to sympathize with her in her predicament.
 Looked Curiously About.
 When Mrs. Bradley came into court she looked about cautiously. appearing to take special interest in noting the idTBc OA WOucU pEcrcnt. merly she has entered the room with downcast eyes and made her way to the chair reserved for her without no- ticing anyone. Before the trial was begun, little Arthur Brown, Mrs. Brad ley's son. was brought to the court house to see his mother.
 Upon opening of court. District Att torney Baker submitted the prayers of the prosecution to the court saying that fbaV did n mt If murder in the first degree or second degree. and preferred to withdraw the matter to be covered by the Judge in his instruction to the jury. The pray CTS of the defense will be submitted later. The Governments prayers are as follows:
 "First-The jury are instructed that sane person has no right to kill an- other, no matter how he may have been wronged by another. no matter how much reason the person doing the kill ing may have for hating and despising. no matter how wild may be the an- ger and passion under which that per son may be laboring. The law does not recognize the theory that any per son may have an irresistible impulse to do such an act as that unless the compulse is the product of diseased mind. The jury are further instruct ed that none of the evidence offered tending to show the treatment of this defendant by Arthur Brown can be tended by them to justify. excuse or palliate her act.
 "Second-The jury are instructed as a matter of law, that insanity, as an excuse for a criminal act Is a disease of that organ of the human body wherein violation the brain. and that a morbid state of the affections or pas sions. or an unsettling of the moral system, the mental faculties remaining meanwhile in a normal condition. is not such a form of insanity that the law recognizes as a valid excuse for a criminal act.
 "Third-The jury are instructed as a matter of law that if they find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that up to the time of commit ting the crime charged in the indict- ment, the defendant was sane. and shall further find beyond reasonable doubt. that immediately thereafter the defendant was sane, then if Is strong presumption that the defendant was sane at the time of the commission of the crime charged In the indictment.
 "Fourth-The jury are instructed that all evidence of the mistreatment of the defendant by Arthur Brown, whether by word or get. whether testified to by the defendant or other witnesses.
 
 sanity or insanity of the defendant at tbe time of the shooting. and is not to bc considered by the jury in. any other way.
 The Desired Verdict.
 "Fifth-The jury are instructed that if they believe from the evidence be- vond a reasonable doubt that the de- fendant threatened and menaced the deceased with a loaded pistol for the purpose of compelling him to marry her, or for any other purpose, and while so threatening and menacing the deceased, said pistol was unintention- aIly discharged, and the deceased re- ceived therefrom the wound of which he died. then the jury should find the defendant guilty of manslaughter.
 pr, D. K Shute the jail physician. who began his testimony Wednesday, resumed the stand and on cross exami- nation. reiterated his statement that in his opinion Mrs. Bradley was not in- sane. The defense sought to contradict the witness by a previous statement made to them that Mrs. Bradley was not mentally responsible but upon ob-