Bisbee daily review., 1907-07-17
COURT Is KEPT
 BUSY
Important Cases Appealed Pro- tract Length of Session and Keep Judges Studying Many Law Points.

PHOENIX, July 16.-Another move was made yesterday in the case of Eduardo Ramirez former customs bro ker of Nogales, Sonora, whom the Mex ican government is trying to get hold of on a charge of forgery. In the case of the title of Arturo M Elias appel lant, against Eduardo Ramirez, re- spondent. Judge A c. Baker yester- day filed in the office of the clerk of the supreme court a bond on appeal. The amount of the bond is $500. The sureties are NJ. G. Samaniego and Fill berto Aguirre' of Tucson. The appel lant is the Mexican consul at Tucson. So. in this case Judge Baker repre- sents the Merican government.
 Ramirez who had fled from Mexico had taken refuge on this side of the line and arrested on a warrant based on a warrant issued in Mexico charg- ing the former broker with having de frauded the Mexican government cHt of about sf1 ,000 by means of forged bills of lading of cargoes of imported wheat. The government claimed to know that it had actually been de- | frauded of not less than S70.000, though the amount might have been | much more even than that.It had. how ever. partly protected itself by con | fiscating everything that Ramirez could not carry out of Mexico with him including a new opera house which he had recently completed at Nogaies, | Sonora, at a cost of Ss0,000.
 Ramirez was taken before Judge | Campbell at Tucson who ordered his eXtradition on the showing that had been made. An appeal was taken to the supreme court on this order and 1t was set aside on the ground that though the offense charged was ex. traditable, though there was sufficient evidence that Ramirez had been con. nected with the offense there was not legal evidence before the court that any offense had been committed. 1 United States Attorney Alexander appealed on the part of the govern. ment from this finding of the court and pending the determination of the matter the bond of Ramirez was fixed at 5000 which he subsequently for. nished.
 Papers in the appeal of the defend, | ant in the case uf Martin Costello against the Copper Belle Mining Com | pany, COchise county were filed. A copy of the papers in appeal by { Morse, R. Morse, J. Nj. Burris. J. ". Foss and J. c. Prick against the Ari- zOna Corporation Charter Guarantee company, The Calumet Consolidated l Copper Company. The International Gold Mountain Mining and Explora. 1 tion ompany, 4. J. Daggs, R. E. Daggs 1 and others were filed.
 This was dispute over some aban. doned mining claims in the Pioneer mining district in Pinal county. The plaintiffs had located or relocated two i claims callin them Iron Mountain No l and Iron Mountain No. ?. They were subsequently relocated by the Arizona Corporation Charter Guarantee Com pany and disposed of to others Of th5 defendants
 The plaintiffs asked that tne defend ants be declared to have nc right ol title to the property. In :he answer to the complaint the defendant! averred that the plaintiffs had com piled with none of the laws in regarC
 to relocation, but had acted as if tnCl
 were the original discovecefs; tha
 they did not even comply wi-h ti.,
 laws relating to the location of mines
 that they treated an abandoned shas
 as if they had made it and that in on,
 year all the work done by the plin
 tiES was to move an old dump abou
 ten feet. Judgment was given By
 Judge Kent at Florence for the defend
 ants by dismissing the complaint with out prejudice.