The Washington herald., 1907-11-22

ator Brown accompanied her. 1t was
upon this occasion that Mrs. Bradley
was suffering from an operation, Dr.
Whitney had previously testified.
Senator Brown came with her in the
afternoon. She came alone IN the morn
ing"
Now, doctor. tell the jury what SenA-
tor Brown said upon that occasion" This
question was also objected to by the pros
ecution. and tha attorneys went 10 the
bench for a consultation with Justice
Stafford. The conference lasted for sew
eral minutes and at its end, DR.. Whitney
was finally excused as a witness 1t is
assumed that the defense tried TO show
that Brown admitted in the presence of
] Dr. Whitney that he had performed the
operation.
salt Lake Lawyer Testifies.
The next witness was Samuel A. King,
a lawyer. OF Salt Lake City. He testified
that he had been acquainted with Senator
Brown since 1898. He also knew Mrs.
Brown. and became acquainted with Mrs.
Bradley during 1855, and knew her very
well about June, 1900.
What was Mrs. Bradley's reputation
for peace and good order up TO December
is, 1902 asked Judge Powers
1T was good.
Did you ever have occasion TO so TO
Mrs. Bradley for Senator Brown?"
Yes; 1 cannot recall the exact date, but
it was sometime between the month OF
September. 1902, and March, 1904; but I do
not recall the exact date
1T was while the cases were pending
in the courts against them. was it not?'
Yes, il was
The witness at this point turned 10 JUS
tice Stafford. and stated that he occupied
confidential relations with Brown ar one
/ time. was his counsel in the proceedings
growing out Of the arrests, and he did not
desire TO be placed in position where II
might be considered that he was disclosing
confidential communications
| Justice Stafford stated that the ques-
tiOns related to matters that passed be-
| tween him and Mrs. Bradley, and that
he did not believe the witness would be
disclosing information that was conhden-
tial between a lawyer and client. The
witness then proceeded to relate the de-
tails concerning his visit TO Mrs. Bradley.
L visited Mrs. Bradley he said. and
endeavored to persuade her that what
| ever relations may have existed between
her and Senator Brown should cease,
and II he was under any obligations TO
her that he would be perfectly willing 20
provide for her and her children, and in
reply 10 my suggestions she stated that
-she did not desire Mr.. Browns money
or his property. She stated that all she
wished was for him 20 fulhll his promise
10 her and his obligations 20 her. That
was the substance of this interview
What. if anything, was said about the
children
she said TO me on this occasion that
I q -. s.Fe
children and even though he might not
owe an obligation to her he nevertheless
owed an obligation TO them 20 give them
a name. There was nothing else, she
said, could take the place Of that"
Mr. King said that Mrs Bradley was
insane on the subject of Senator Brown
and her children.
Col. Kaishn Recalled.
Col Maurice NJ Kaighn, whose testi-
mony when he Was placed on the stand
early this week. resulted in Mrs. Brad
ley being placed on the stand earlier
than the defense had first intended, took
the stand following Mr.. King. and his
[ testimony commanded the attention OF
every one Like Mr.. King, he cor
t roborated in every way Mrs. Bradley 5
statements He stated that he had
known Senator Brown since 1877. and was
also acquainted with the Senator's wife,
Mrs. Isabelle Cameron Brown, and knew
. both of them well. He also knew Mrs.
Bradley, he said, becoming very well ac-
p quainted with her in 1892.
Asked concerning Mrs. Bradley's ap-
pearance now and in 1855. he said that
. il was very much different. Then, and
/ for several years following. she was full
OF life and vitality, and, while not robust,
was strong and healthy, and much flesh
Ter than at present He said she was
phenOmenally bright, intellectual, and ar
tstic He said that he first became
aware Of the fact that improper reIa-
d tions existed between Brown and Mrs.
Bradley in September. 1902
About that time / appeared in the pre-
limiuary hearing for Senator Brown
after his arrest" he said, and I had a
conversation with her al the behest of
l Senator Brown. I referred to the rela-
: ton between herself and Senator Brown,
the scandal it was causing and the dis
tress to many people. I was leading up
I 70 the money proposition that 1 was
2 about 10 make 10 her when she said
, You are about to make me some finan-
cial proposition 1 said, That was my
j purpose in sending for you. She became
pale and agit2ted, and she said, You
have known me for many years, and ]
thought you knew me better than to
- come TO me with a money proposition tC
settle this terrible condition of affairs.
Heard PitifuI story.
y Il thought she ought to go away then
o and she told me that I did not know
Z very much about the situation. I told
her that I had talked with Senator
= Brown, and that he had told me ther,
had been a child born TO her. l told hel
that 1 did not care TO listen further and
y she became excited and so agitated tha
r l told her to go ahead.
= You are his attorney she said. 'anC
I you must know all about it. You ar,
q interfering with matter that you do
Il not understand or know, and you ar,
d rushing in TO interfere Ike others.
!. do not want you TO think that I am al
impure woman or a bad woman. Ou
:, relations are based upon my affection
y, for him. Mrs. Brown and were friends
He came to me in his own house witt
u protestations of love, and persisted il
n attentions TO me. coming 10 see M
n without my invitation. l told him tha
4, no relations could ever be established
10 between us. He kept after me; he toll
<. me he was unhappy. he said that n
/ and Mrs. Brown were husband and wifi
only in name. that they had discusse
S. the advisability- OF securing a divorce
= and that he was then engaged in a plal
e OF dividing his property. After he KEEP