The Washington herald., 1907-03-23
Circuit Court No. 1.
lUSTICE WRIGHT.


Cleveland vs.. Harries e al motion for leave 10
I nle an amended declaration granted. Plaintiffs at
/ tomeys, George A Berry and Rossa F. Downing
/ defendants attorneys. Stuart Mcnamara and ". r
Hodges
Morris IS. Clark; motion for new trial overrnied
and Judgment on verdict f0T plaintiff for $3.50:
appeal noted, bond for costs 500 Plaintiffs attor
nsys. Vol Rosenberg defendants attorney H.
/ E. Davis
1 Chapman-W WhiteLyons Company vs. Eldridge: mo-
tou % set aside Judgment by default and stay pro
+ ceedings ogeruled. Plaintiffs attorney h. Win
slip Nheatey; defendants attorney r. 5. key
smith
Wagner vs.. Wnkins; motion for security foF c.sts
granted Plaintiffs attomcy Joseph o. sullivan
defendants attorneys. W. H. sholes and Bates
Warren.
Hurst vs. Miller: leave granted defendant to ale
AFFIDAVIT within three days IN support Of motion for
a neW trial and motion continued % March p
Fiaintlns attorney, T. Forrest, defendants attoF-
ne3s, BEandeHbuTg & Brandenburg
sii.eFs rs Cooper; motion for new trial cen
tinued to March =, Plaintiffs aitornegs. IL y
Davis and T. Forrest; defendants attorney. John
Rid0ut
Hight w. Moore; motion for new trial fled
Plaintiffs attorneys. A. Y. Bradley; defendants
attorney. A. a. Birney.
Thompson Starrett Company vs. Laurel CLAY
ifodncls Company leave grated 20 George A.
RULER Company, ganshee, 10 le amended auswers
Plaintiffs attorney. W D. Dlyidge
Assignments for Monday March 3 1867:
No. s2. Walker Waner. Attorneys. Tucker
a Kenyon -Giitings & Chamberlfn
No: 40 Goennsf IS. Newman. Attorneys. sholes
a Waren-E. A. Newman
No - Rennor vs. DoFF Attorney, J. A. MaedeI
No. S95. Buscher Us. District Of Columbia A.
torneys. J. F. Scaggs. Thompson & Laskey-E. h.
Thomas
No. 5G- Miller vs. Potomac Laundry compapv
ATTORNEYS, W. C. PIeatiss and George + Williams
l. J. MatheF aud e. 7. HUndisr
Na go. Bern. ys. District of Columbia. Attor-
neys A ; Warrington, \. s, Minor and J. p
Collins-E. II. Thomas
No. aI3 Taylor vs.. Taylor. Attorney. J. ". Jen-
n'nss-Padgett q Forrest.
No 500 Player vs.. Slater Attorneys. T. L
GiJs-Laon T0briner
No IS Brown Is Andrews PAPER Connauv
Attorneys, Tucker & kenyon-Walf and Rose1beyu
70. S'L Aliier vs. Washington and Gettysburg
RAILWAY Attorneys, Chaplin Brown aud Ctsorqe NJ
breS-J. B. LaTner and ]. J. Darlington
No Al Foster sand Filtration CORPORATION
qi America. Attorneys B. 7. Doyle-Douslas &
Douglas and L. ]. Mather
Circuit Court No. 2.
JUSTICE ANDERSON
Nolan vs.. District of Columbia; motion sor new
Flai overniled and Judgment on verdict fer defend
ant az plaintiffs cast. Plaintiffs attorneys Gordon
q 'iafdoni defendants attorneys T. H. Thomas
aud H. r. Blair.
Lyon vs. Bursey; motion for new trial ovsrraled;
judgment op verdict for plaintiff fer rosss-son: su-
pcai bond for costs Sle0 Plaintiffs attorney Jobn
kldouti defendants attorney, William Henry White
HAYES vs.. Dewitt; melton TO qussh wit Of Ger.
tlorarl overuled Plaintiffs attorney L. ]. Mather:
defendant attorney Hayden johnson.
Watson rs Nesline: demurrer sustained with Iesrs
70 amend IN i've DAYS. Plaintiffs attorneys. HILL
mons.
Arnoid VS. Booth; motion for new trial overr7iled
mdgment on verdict for plaintiff for 81 $50. Plain
Tin attorneys, Wolf & Rosenberg and ". Z L.
ter defendants attorney Eugene A. Jones
United states, eH- rel Lowry Allen Judgment
as pr mandate disehargiug rule and dsmissng Ieti-
money deposited for costs
Frsser IS. Southern Pacific Company; motion TO
auash service granted. Plaintiffs attorney. p II
Aeitch. defendants attorneys. L. E Payson and c.
". Bates
Williams vs. Woodward & Lothrop: Judgment on
verdict for plaintiff for Si5)0 Plaintiffs attoneys.
Woh \ Rosenberg; defendants attorneys, WOrthing-
ton Heaid & FTailey
schwartz IS. COsgrove motion for new trial sub
mitted. Plaintiffs attorneys, L. H. David and R. [
Is. BehFend DEFENDANTS attorney John Ridout
Assignments tor Monday. March q 1867:
No, 80 fauau IS District Of Columbia Attar- /
neys. J. J. Darlington and ". Ii. sholes-E II. |
No. SO. Fletcher IS. Auacostia and Potomac Raj
road Company. Attorneys. b. 7. Doyie-J. J. Dar- /
lngton
No. 81 Thomss vs. Washington Ralleay and Ele., /
tnc Company. AttoTueys ". J. Lamhey-J. J. /
Darlington.
Nc. 252 Catholic University of America rs. was 1
gaman Attorneys, Hamilton. Colbert q Hamilton /
W + Nattiugiy, J. b. LarneF. and Arthur Peter.
No. H0aa. GiaIia vs. Washington and southern 1
Railway Company. Attorneys L. ]. Ma s.her-Mc
kenney & F1annery.
No. l00 Cover vs. Southern Railway Companv.
Attemeys. Padgstt q FoFrest-Hamilton. Colbert 4
Hamilton.
No 8s, Barnes vs. Slater Attoneys. Turner 4
Alitcher George I, Williams
Ne 3o6 Talbot ys. McDermott ATTORNEYS. B. +.
Leighton-J }. Darlington.