The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-06-03
RECORD OF THE COURTS.
Circuit Court.

Circuit Court.
 Jures will be organized In the clrcut court this morning at 10 o'clock to serve in both divisions for the week. The following docket Is set in Judge Coleman's division of the circuit court today:
 Martha Clark vs Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company. damages; W. S. Hamer vs George C. Harris. damages; J. H. Compton. administrator, vs. Fra ternal Cencer. assumpsit; George Thacls- CT vs. w. H. Dabbs. damages; Nora K. Curry vs. W. II. Hyronemous. attach ment; Cornelius Wright vs Charles Drennen assumpsit General Brazler vs. Avondale Mills, damages; J. L. Garner vs. Western Union Telegraph company, dam ages; J. D. Evans vs. Western Union Telegraph company, damages; Tennessee Valley Fertilizer company vs. G. A. Grif- filth ,assumpst.
 Circuit Court Docket-Jury.
 The following docket Is set in Judge Lanes division of the circuit court to- day:
 Annie B. Handbury, administrative, vs. Alabama Great Southern Railroad com pany, damages; Mary Young vs Birming- ham Water Works company, damages; N. G. Brake vs. Stowers Furniture com- pany, damages; John Herman vs. J. w. Grant assumpst; Joe Robinson, pro ami, vs United Brothers of Frnedshp and Sisters of Mysterious Ten, assumpsit; II. J. Henderson vs. Alabama Great South ern Railroad company, dameges; Louis vile and Nashville Railroad company vs. Alabama Great Southern Railroad com pany, damages; First National Bank of Birmingham vs. P. c. Smith ct al., as- sumpsit; II. F. Chlders vs. Mrs. Esther Black, appeal Loveman, Joseph and Loeb vs Peoples Home Telephone company, damages.
 City Court.
 Jury trials will be held in the first and third divisions of the city court this week; non-jury trials in the second divis- ion, and equity cases in the fourth divis- l ion
 Jurors are requested to attend in the l first division this morning punctually at 10 o'clock at which hour jurles will be organized to serve during the week.
 City Court Docket-Jury.
 The following docket is set in the first division of the city court today: l Carruthers-Jones Shoe company vs. At l lanta and Birmingham Air Line ct al., J. W. Carroll vs. Birmingham Railway Light and Power company, damages; Stella Bennett vs. Birmingham Railway Light and Power company damages Moore X Handley Hardware company vs. Atlanta and Birmingham Air Line Railway com pany ct al, assumpsit; J. M. Pledger vs. l W N Griffin ct al, damages; Pleasant 1 Dickerson vs. J. E. Weaver ct al., dam ages; Bessemer Water Works company vs. Virginia Investment company, con demnation proceedings; w. c. Lockett vs. 1 Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages NJ M Higgins vs. Rankn-Tuck Paint company, damages; C. ] Bennazzi vs Birmingham Tailoring com pany. appeal.
 Second Division Docket-Non-Jury.
 The following docket Is set in the sec ond division of the city court todays
 The Max Winkler Brokerage Co. vs. J. w. Sapp, ct al, appeal; M. James vs. j. W Shoot, appeal. Bennie & Co.,. vs. C. O. Anderson, assumpslt; W. F.. Hans berger vs Board of Education, man damus; Crescent Milling Co. vs. J. C. Westbrook, administrator, assumpsit; 1 Jasper Furniture Go. vs. Dearborn Desk
 
 pam vs. w. P, Plnckard assumpst w. 1 c. Sper vs. F. Thornton Mayre. ct al., attachment; Woodawn vs. NJ. r. Messer, appeal Eva Brown vs. Ed Barron. cer- tio-ari; c. W. Davis vs. Birmingham Railway. Light and Power company, ap- peal Bruce Oglestreet vs St. Louis and 1 San Francisco Railroad company, ap- l pe~l Arthur Clark vs. Joe Marsicani, appeal; Annie Browd ys. Birmingham 1 Railway. Light and Power company. ap- i peal.
 Third Division Docket-Jury.
 The following docket is set in the third l division of the city court today: l Robert G. Sharritt vs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad company. damages; l Sallle Bussey vs Dirmngham Railway, l Light and Power company. damages; 1 John R Jones vs Warrior Manufactur- l ing company damages; J. A. Stallings vs. Birmingham Railway. Light and Power company. damages; Victoria Hill vs. Birmingham Railway. Light and Power company, damages Elizabeth Kehle, administrative. vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company. damages; Joseph Rowney vs. Tennessee | Coal, Iron and Railroad company dam ages: J. w. Tuggle vs Sloss-Sheffield Steel and Iron company damages; Mary