The Pensacola journal., 1907-05-11
N. Goldring, Distributor

that Kendall was simply a superin-
tendant
Witness stated that Long came TO
him and said he was employed to do
the work for the cost of labor and
material plus 10 per cent. All who
were working, except Altman, were
employed on this basis Alfmans bill
came in in a big lump and the com
miSSiOners made him itemize il. Wit
ness did not remember how the board
voted on the matter. He knew Mr..
Stewart was opposed to the $500
proposition, as he understood the $500
would complete the job, carpenter
work and all
c. l. Fulton, who was on the stand
when adjournment was taken for sup
Rer, was then called, but failed to ap-
pear.
r. s. Crockett
Mr. Crockett, who testified previous
ly to having received $3.50 per day
from Mr.. Fulton, said he had received
that sum for some time before work
ing on the court house. In October
witness was receiving $3.50 and in
November received $500 or $3.50
Fulton had paid $3.50 per day because
labor was scarce. For painting wit
ness said he received. as he remem-
bered, $50 per day-this was on the
Pfeiffer job. Witness admitted that
he had a regular agreement with Full
ton to receive $3.50 per day, when wit
ness returned TO Pensacola after the
storm. Fulton, however, did not pay
this sum all the time-witness was
referring only 10 the court house
work. Witness said he did not mean
TO testify that he had drawn $3.50 per
day all the time, as he only drew $500
when he came back. He had received
$3.50 per day from Mr.. Fulton before
working on the court house but could
not specify any particular job or time.
He did not remember when he went
to work for Mr.. Fulton, but was here
during the storm. The agreement for
the $3.50 per day was made one Sat
urday-witness could not name the
date He had been working in No
vember and had received So per day.
1t must have been December when he
made the agreement for $3.50. Wit
ness was now receiving $3.50 for
painting at FIT Picl<ens The class
Of work he was now doing was the
same as when he received $500 for
the court house work. J. Z. Long
paid the fare of witness to and from
the work.
Witness said he had not seen Mr.
Fulton since court adjourned for sup
per.
Frank PaImquist.
Mr.. Palmquist did not remember
just when he went TO work for Mr.
Fulton. but it was several months be-
fore the work commenced on the
court house. Previous to the work on
the court house Witnessed received
S275 per day On the court house
witness worked four or five weeks,
which included the month of Decem-
Der. Witness was preceded as fore
man by Mr.. McCreary, but he could
not say the wages the latter was re-
ceiving.
Witness came from work on John
PfeiffeT's house 10 work upon the
court house. After witness came TO
work on the court house his wages
were raised TO $3.50 per day. Witness
kept the time of all men, and the
largest number working in any one
week was seven
Witness said he did not know W.
J. Hall, and did not remember that
such a man had been at work He
did not remember ". H. Mistro or
John English and had not turned in
time for any of these men.
Witness said he received only So. so
per day and if Fulton had put in the
time at s. per day. that was not the
sum he WAS receiving Witness I'M
derstood Tom Sennot was receiving
$3.50 per day on the court house work