The Caldwell tribune. [volume] (Caldwell, Idaho Territory [Idaho]) 1883-1928, 1907-11-23
JUDGE BRYAN
begins COURT

state VS.. w. Fuller, grand larceny;
state vs.. George F. Smith, grand lar
ceny; state vs. j. w. Beasley, grand
larceny; state VS.. ]. D. Noonan, for
gerry; state VS. John Doe, alias Cum
ningham.
Cases of Law.
Moss Mercantile company VS.. Hen
ry Helmick, foreclosure; Richards &
Haga for plaintiff and s. w. Ken
ward for defendant.
H. M. Kimball VS.. M. A. Kurtz and
Mrs. Belle Kurtz, foreclosure; Hays
& Johnson for plaintiff.
Thomas Hawkins VS.. S. l.. Sparks,
damages; l. w. Kenward, for plain
tiff, and T. d. Catalan for defendant.
P. A. Devers VS.. R. A. Cowden,
debt; Hawley & Pickett for plain
tiff and F. J. Smith for defendent.
o. S. L. Railroad VS.. C. ]. F. Peter
son, injunction; D. Worth Clark for
plaintiff and Griffiths & Griffiths for
defendant.
Manuel A. Whitney vs.. Myra G.
Schwartz, foreclosure; A. A. Frazier
for plaintiff.
Walter Mead VS.. ]. L. Henshaw,
damages; Cox & Adams for plaintiff,
l. w. Kenwood for defendant.
Davis Hannah vs. w. w. Vensel,
foreclosure; Rec & Thompson for
plaintiff and Hawley & Pickett for
defendant.
Commercial Bank vs.. F. R. Berry,
debt; Rice & Thompson for plaintiff,
Griffiths & Grifiths for defendant.
Charles Larson vs. Lincal Mining
company, damages; Nugent, Whitsell
& Miller for plaintiff
Seraphine De Cloedt VS.. Walter
Griffith. quieting title; w. B. David
son for plaintiff and Griffiths & Grit
fiths for defendant.
George l.. Myers VS.. John j. Jarvis,
damages; Rice & Thompson for
plaintiff and Griffiths & Griffiths for
defendant.
]. A. Youngkin VS.. Canyon Canal
company, debt; Borah & Upton for
plaintiff andS. H. Hays for defendant.
Hattie M. Gilmore VS.. w. Frank
Moot, debt; I. w. Kenward for plain
tiff and Cox & Aadms for defendant
A. Fl. Hamilton VS.. City of Nampa,
debt; Frank Martin for plaintiff and
G. w. Lamson for defendant.
Lavinaca Rockwell vs. City of
Nampa, damages; S. D. Fairchild for
plaintiff and G. w. Lamson for de-
PENDANT.
Minna Epstine VS.. August Aukamp,
to quiet title; Rice & Thompson for
plaintiff.
D. D. Campbell vs.. City of Cald-
we'll, Injunction; W. A. Stone for
plaintiff and H. E. Wallace for de-
fendent.
Albert Gamble VS.. T. j. Bailey
debit Borah & Cavanah for plaintiff
and F. H. Lyons for defendant.
Ashton Bank VS.. John Williams
foreclosure; Jackson & Walters fol
plaintiff.
Mamie Franklin vs. Commodore F
Franklin, divorce; F. H. Lyons fol
plaintiff.
Daniel Taylor vs. Albert G.. Winks
debt; Finley Monroe for plaintiff anC
Jackson & Walters for defendent.
Amar letters VS.. A. r. letters, di
vorce; Van Duyn & Plowhead TO
plaintiff and G. w. Lamson for de
fendent
B. ]. Mailman vs.. Dista Carter
debt; Karl Paine for plaintiff an
Van Duyn & Plowhead for defendent
Mary e. Simpson VS.. II. II. Dew
ey; Hawley & Pickett for plaintiff
damages.
A. X. Stoddard vs.. ]. W. Fox, dam
ages: G. w. Lamson for plaintiff an
r. v. Scatterday for defendant
Payette Valley Mercantile com
pany vs.. @. w. Mulch, debt; Rice
Thompson for defendant.
II. 8. Hopper Va, R. A. McCooB
damages; c. d. Fillinghast for plain
tiff and Finley Monroe for defendant
F. G. Cottingham VS.. School dis
a.
trict No. 81. debt: 4. j. Frawley 10
plaintiff and Rice & Thompson for de
fendent.
Dollie Caldwell vs., Lincoln Mimi
company. damages; T. D. Catalan 10
plaintiff.
G. w. Cole vs. j. M. Fox, debt; I
w. Lamson for plaintiff and F.
Smith for defendant.
David Taylor vs.. John G. Whippl
debt; F. Monroe for plaintin an