The evening world., 1907-04-09

mind. ns hi. gaze fell upon the
hid~ous aud hated form OF
stanford white. my client he
held, in an instantaneous
panorama. the whole terrible
drama.
The Picture Thsw Saw.
-He saw htn eptfeinK the ehiIa
to his RiIdcd dens. lie saw him
piytRE her with poisoned wine.
Hf-aaYT her senses rcellna and her
sight leaving her. as the drug
mounted 10 her brain. He saw him
leaning over the deapoiied child
with his eSes shininE with lust
aud his coarpe b@dS disteade
with hate. He saw her. he had
seen her In slekness he saw her
a. -~he had told him her pitiable
Story, he saw her as he led her 20
the altar. saw stanford white
snytnE, 4 shall get her back'-he
saw all this Ahd his senses reeIed
aud, vitheor thought or renec-
don, he struck, the tiRr~~s
rtrikr- the invader who would
dcspoii her of h-r rouhE--~fruck
Hnhood. strutE far the hss,Sr OF
humanity. struck for his vTffe and
his honor, struck for wrongs d"n-
and undone, struck for other
dren-and n he struck thinking he
was s-n Instrument Of God anG
Providence, who shall cay he was
I'm errorf Who shan say that he
OF God 40 the rhiIdren OF Israel of
old-the promise that he who de-
spoIIs the china of the widow
--i-ah- perish hN she s-ordf'
The room had risen nRuratlyely on
uptocs II was the strongest stroke
lleimns had Yet delivered The Jurors
bent forward. breathlng fast ike .rnen
Nno had run race. Harry ThAW had
y Ia a
his lips twltchinE his nnger tips plug
k,hk Us ears as II 20 shut out the sound
% l,elnaS's great. booming voice Bur
Evelyn Ncsbii Thaw sat er-sct with her
spa1o rigid. her eyes blazing her cheeks
flushed and her lips apart-A picture
inrarnAte OF apprcha ton and satisfac-
ton There vaHrA world * contrast In
me ATTITUDES OF these two chief actors
IN tho big tragedy Of this big trial
Thaw Was Irrational.
,, G.ntlemen." went on DelmAs. three
alsinlrrested witnesses, including Mar
ln Green. responsible and trained
: writer and observer of human aTaIrs
2 l'ate told You THAT Sir. Tnaw was IRA.
y, ''i9i ,S. on ma, nat isietul night Tbs guards
ms Irrational actions. and they have
on YOU also that Harry ThAw heard
9,ss no one else could hear Or
abnrI ana lpr. Evans. two learned
al"nists of wide experience have told
YOU that Mr.. Thaw Vas clearly ira
mona shortly after the tragedy. Can
'V u'unl lhen. that he was IRA tionai
ai lns moment when ne fired the SHOT
'HHt hiicd IN" man ne most feared"
VOW, lhsn. We come 10 the t-stI-
m'ny ot Dr Allan As'lane Ham.itol.
"a VIII recall that thr Dlatr-t.Ari .r.
n-f Promised under his oath T. put br
Hamilton on The stand u We did not
hut Do did NOT keep his promise And
moreover. when W. ourselves put Or
Hamilton on the stand the Dis,rict-At-
lorney objected % his test mony WHY
I y NOT the inf~renca plain that II DR.
Hamilton had been permitted 20 testify
ne would have sworn thst Harry X
/ Ih1N was insane when Or. Hamilton
Y s1W him two dFys after the tragedy
I Moreover you VIII recall that when
I hr N1hQn and Or Flint who nov slt
| here took the stand she Districi-Attof-
/ nry al NOT ak them Il Harry Thaw
was sane at me time of the shooting
-. ne qId rot no, AK them them tnd h2ld ne.
I ~ did they would tell him Harry ThaN
was insaas % June g. 1905 hold
also"--
Garkln- Made Objection.
Here came tho hrsi objection 70 Del
mass line N argument Jerome was
/ upstairs preparing his speech, and 90 ~
whs Garvan VINO rose up With q pro
Sustained" said Justice Fitzgerald.
.'rhe jury must not consider any mat
] ter not i1 evidence
Drimas tried 10 argue the point. but
/ Justice fIagerald waved MIN down.
B ArrrtdueN nclWas took a somewhat
. different anglo lie pnntea out that
LIE lAlLll2 pll1Elrt1I17 ~ tt--tti-4 4sFsfsls
. professcd every confidence nad testified
I 10 Harry Thnw'H abnormal condition aa
I "a child and 10 HE dslusions IN manhood.
I ne reviewed the evidence of the nine
/ sNprrtt who trsuhtd Tor the defense
Is pTomlnencs ana eKpruence the sia
alI'ulHff who testified for the state.
Ihls prrp0ndrrAnce ~ evidence ln Ia
,7r II p side he ho.i would have com
IHt zone Hp futtnor.
Benefits by q Doubt
-For "a reasonable d1ubt.' he *
pounded. "a reasonable doubt BE- me
Iur1ucrtF lf the defendant. and you cans
Inoi take n away from him. II belpnEa
= H.n SOD you must give u 20 iiin.
n ii thrre f one chance in "a hundred
tlat flis man iapored under a deiuflpu.
EI-sI Irf huHt trrdth chanre cunati tutes
a reasonable doupt u " nos for ui
he kllisd Mhils Ana the absence of
complete proof of that sanity gives -
" a ruas4na 1.e dput.'
have not EiFcn % name to the specier
| ai Insanity which Hairy IhAN hdu
| But ] viii tel 1ou. j. is spcclca oi
I insanity whkr makes man believe
1 hlH homo iH Harrni that tn0 honor oi
hH Hift lt scored ilni fhc honor o'
lif dalFhtrr is Fcred
"a "a the Hpocies Of insanity Nniel
had Dern Recognized hels n New .Y9rs
- | affen lutr frnfh lfiacnrk Nno kllol
, 10 nife'n Eeiucor 10 haH been recog
Hsrs aaryan broEi n ~itn anolhsi
) ositelioa ~ sad pslnAA wps undsl
takfg 70 e1p0aild the Law and wAs no