The Washington herald., 1907-11-19
Continued from Page One.

ticIes. She would wiring her hands con
staatly while / was talking TO her. She
put her hands to her head and said: ]
feel as If 1 were far away from every
thing"
What did you say to herr"
4 told her that / had been sent by
my PAPER to get a statement from her,
and that I would print anything she said.
j told her # she did not want TO tail
she should not do so. She said she ha1
20 she asked me not 10 do so, and SAID
that she could rot be left alone with feI
thoughts that she would go mad
Did she talk connectedly?"
NO; she did not. 1 had 10 constantly
ask her questions in order 70 get state
ment. She would partly answer a ques-
ton and then switch of 70 something
else When I asked her what happened
over at the hotel she said:
Oh don't ask me that; so many men
came running into the room and got ne
and took ne out in the street and
brought me a long way
I asked her II she had any children
and her name. She told me she was Mrs
Bradley. and said that she had two chill
dren. and that they were Senator Brown
children. I asked her If she came to
Washington for the purpose OF killing SEN
ator Brown, and she said, No, no, no.
In reply To my question as 10 whether
she had any friends, she said: No; Wha;
right have / to have any friends? How
can ] expect any one t. be a friend OF
mine2 l am an outcast I have no one
TO help ne. / have no right 10 ask any
one to help me-
Thought Her Insane.
on cross examination. Mr.. Baker asked
the witness if he had published at the
time a story Of what Mrs. Bradley had
told him When the witness responded
that he had. he was asked if ne had not
published a connected story, although he
stated she talked disconnectedly.
Yes" said Mr. Hay, 1T was my nusi-
ness to put her story connectedly."
Did it occur TO you at that time that
you were publishing the story Of an m
sane person."
Il had suspicion at the time that she
was insane
Mr.. Hay was excused. and Charles A.
CotteriIl, another newspaper man, sue
ceeded him on the stand He sall that
he had seen Mrs. Bradley on tho nizh.
Of December s. once about 6:15. and again
about $3.50. At both times he SAID She
appeared frail, haggard. and careworu.
and that she seemed in a ''frightIur
state Of mind.
Did you notice the expression in her
eyesg'
IT did" replied the witness "Her eyes
seemed 70 have a vacant stare in them -
Mr. Cotterill said that the answers
given by Mrs. Bradley were lucid and
frank. but were given slowly and be-
tween long paUses. She leaned heavily
on chair, he said, and appeared TO be
very much fatigued
On cross-examination. Mr. Cotterll
said that he did not think she was n
sane Mr.. Cotterill was allowed to re-
fresh his memory from notes which he
took at the time. and from his notes he
testified that the substance OF the story
he got as the result OF his interview
was:
she says. that Brown had been the
cause Of the divorce between herself and
husband. and now that Browns wife
was dead he could do the right thing
by her, which he had positively refused -
Tells of Operations.
DIR. E. W. Whitney OF salt Lake. Mrs.
Bradley's physician in Salt Lake, was
called 10 the stand. He said that ne
was graduated in 1878, studied in Europe
for two years and a half, and returned
90 this country. where he Immediately
began to practice his profession He
went TO Salt Lake in 1891, became ac-
quainted with Mrs. Bradley the following
year, and told of treating her on vari-
Gus occasions up to February. 1900.
About that time. doctor" asked Judge
Powers. Il understand you were present
ut the birth of Mrs. BradIey's child?"
Il was"
'Can you tell US what that child was
named?"
Yes: it was named Arthur Brown
Eradley"
When did you next treat Mrs. Brad
ley?"
Il think the next time was in Novem-
bcr. 19jl'
At Attorney HoOver's rao,,oct n