Pine Bluff daily graphic., 1907-01-13
By the light of the moon [ will oo tO her

..nraadina thn road 'n front of hls house with tan barl; and straw and abaut p@1Sons being hN'G 'o rock he. I am ignorant of. Nor ao remember any such stuff as Dr. Patterson driving into FranNli'i- Z IT.. with Il couch or cradle TOT me in his wagon. | only know tadt my father and mother did @VFfV- thing they could think of to Ac!p me when 1 was ill
 was never given to long anh lonely wanderings, especially al night" as stated by McClu'e' $ lag azine. was always accomlEnle' bv some responsible indNiN'2l when l took an evening walk bU' I seldom took one. l have always consistently declared that Was not medium for spirits. never was especially Interested III tha Shakers, never "dabbled ill mes merism," never was .'at amateur clairvoyant," nor did ''t}e suPer.'l- tious country folk frequently SeeN my advice. never went into trance to describe sceues far away, as McCmre's Magazine saEs.
 My oldest sister det1ly loved lAe, i but wounded her pride when ] adopted Christian Science, ana t2 Il Baker that was sorry offence 1 was obliged to be parted from AlE son. because after my fethefss sec ond marriage my little boy Wis net welcome in my fathers house. McCure's Magazine calls Dr. Daniel Patterson, my second hus- hand. "an itinerant dentist. It says that after my marriage We l lived for short time at ton, then moved to Franklin. Dur 1 inc the following nine years the Pattersons led rowing eHisence. The doctor practiced ill sveral towns from Hilton to NoH,h uoton and then to Rumney.' Whn was married to him, pr. Daniq Pat terson was located in Ffaklin. \. H. He had the degree D.D. S., was a popular man, and conMered a rarely skilful dentist. lie hn9ht a place in Rummney, whie he fancied, for summer nom At that time he owned a hoqe ill
 Franklin, N. H.
 Although, as McClure's MgaZine claims, the court record nd state that my divorce from Dr. Pferson was granted on the ground odes2r- ton, the cause nevertAclei was
 adultery. Individuals are .fe tn-
 day who were present in cot when
 the decision was gi:en by u judge
 and who know the followii facts: l After the evidence had be- sub-
 mitted that a husband N about
 to have Dr. Patterson afrted .or
 elonjne with his wife, the ,urt ir-
 structed the clerk to recoGthe dl-
 yorce in my favor. WhaDrevent-
 ed Dr. Patterson's acres was a
 letter from me to this elf same
 husband imploring him nto do it.
 When this husband recored his
 wife, he kept her c l:risof Tn her
 home, ana l was a'.c taa Peans o1
 reconcil;,, the couple. Christian
 Scientist Eao tolG 'ne t+ ".
 tears Of sra'i.:! le .he " oi 'h's
 husband rel3 cd these f. 10 at'
 just as l have stated tn lived l with Dr. Patterson pea4bly, and he was kind to me up the time } of the divorce.
 The following affidaToy R. D. :, Rounsevel of Littletd N. H., l proprietor of the Whi| Mountain e House, Fabyans, N. H.. orlginl! e of which is in my position, is of S interest in this connetn:
 e About the year 1S74r. Patter- r son, a dentist, boardefith me Tn }. Littleton, New Hampsf. During a his stay, at different fs l had IS conversation with hi1R bout his e wife, from whom he separated. ,r He spoke of her beif pure ard
 Christian woman, anke cause Of ,a the separation being billy on lis II. part, that if he hadpe as he ;;- ought he might hav@d as pleas th ant and happy homY one cnu'c d wish for. ; ,t At that time 1 hak knowledge ;s of who his wife wd Later on l q, learned that Mary er c. Eddy, be the discoyerer aufounder of n. Christian Science, the above ,,y mentioned woman