The San Francisco call., 1907-06-19
Haywood When Teufale Letter Read

Of the same fsh line FOR the steunenberg bomb
as on the Bradley or Goddard bomb
Il didn't use the fish line the Bradley
bomb but 1 did use. part of thes-same line
HawIev tnrned from these details to the peni-
tentiary after the arrest. The state brought
up the Adams incident in the penitentiary and
asked Orchard IL it were not true that Adams
advised with some one before calling on the
witness Immediately after his arrest
Orchard said that Adams stated TO him that
he had seen an attorney named Moore.
The question of the right or the state TO go
into any statement made by Adams to Orchard
was ars,,ed by both sides and an objection By
the defense was overruled Orchard said:
saw an ma he sa ne ne
talked to me about making confession.
The admissibility of the conversations was re-
sisted by Richardson, who claimed that TINS was
an effort to introduce Adams CONFESSION under
the guise of conversation
Senator Borah said that the state was not
seeking to introduce this as testimony OF con
spirator He said that the prosecution desired
TO get voluntary statement that Adams had
made to Orchard If it should turn out that this
was a confession the state entitled to know
what Adams had said when not under any COM
pulsion of any kind contenaeo boran- Adams.
as coconspirator with Haywood has made
confession and then repudiated 1t. The state
wished simply TO show by the witness that there
was confession.
what Adams had said about confession, but
would not go into the confession itself
ADAMS TALKS OF COMPOSING
adams told me- Orchard said, that would
not be alone in making confession. and that
he thought he would make confession himself"
After this conversation did you and Adams
continue TO occupy the same cell ana did ne oc-
cupy It with you after tne conversation with
McI'arland?" asked Hawley.
Yes, sir; he did.
did you and Adams have conversation with
Senator Borah and myself In the penitentiary
shortly after your talk with Adams!''
was this matter of Adams confession gone
into between the four OF us
Yes sir; Adams-end myself talked with you
and Senator Borah about the confession.
The defense continued TO fight hard the intro
duction of this line of testimony The court was
inclined TO give much latitude 10 the examina-
tion but finally sustained an objection to intro
duction of the conversation between Orchard,
Adams, Haywood and Senator Borah.
Orchard was turned over for the redirect cross
examination by Richardson.
Orchards sale of his share in the Hercules
mine was gone into at length in an effort to
show that the property was not sold in 1897 but
was simply mortsaged to Cordonia. Orchard in
sisted that he had sold the mine out In 1897
Didn't you tell Dave Coates that you had an
interest in the mine when you were driven out
of the Occur d'Alenes;" asked Richardson
no. sir; did not.
Orchard also denied that he had made the
same statement TO a stage driver.
WIFE rs DECEIVED
when I was in Wallace in 1906" he said, 'I
met Cordona and in Joking way I said he
might give me 81. coo or $4,000, as he had done
well in the mine. "
Orchard was closely questioned to his
connection with Haywood about the conversa-
tion that he had with HAYWOOD in making the
arrangements about the letters TO his wife.
II met Haywood in Pettibone's house store
In July or August of 1905. sad Orchard HE
said my wife had been writing to him. I Told
him to write to her and tell her had gore 10
Alaska"
This was prior to August 80.
''Have you seen Haywood since that time?
asked Richardson
you directed your wife to deliver those let
ters to the Pinkertons more than year ago,
NO sir. I didn't. I didn't know of the let
tiers until some time ago.
Richardson went closely into the conference
between Hawley Borah. Mcfarland and Orchard
within the last few days Orchard said that
the letters were not shown TO him then or
described.
you said you told Haywood to write in July
was not written until November 17T' shouted
Il think can. don't think that Haywood
intended to write at that time ! think that that
until mg we e nin ass e orehsrd w @
why did you tell Haywood, Meyer and Pet
tibone that you had given the letter to your
wife to Paddy Maloney and had dated the let
ter from San Francisco"
'.The reason was said Orchard very de-
see me in Jail than not know where was.
HIS DAUGHTER IN CANADA
Changing to- another subject, Richardson
asked II it was not and had not been tae
custom OF tHe WSStNku lcucioiioh u -
send lawyer to the assistance of members IN
trouble
II know they have done So"
You know, don't you. that where troubles
arise as the result OF strike members OF the
western federation of miners are always de-
Tended by counsel furnished by the western
federation of miners: 2:
- i've seen il done; yes sir
.You know, don't you, that whenever troubles
arise from strike, the newspapers lay IL 20
the western federation of mineEE 49,,
1--WE object'' shouted Senator Boran' tne
ne eyspapers are the best evidence.
isThe worst'' drawled Clarence barrow.
There was a pause, Richardson suddenly
What Is the name of your daughter now
living In Canada?''
Orchards face fell and his voice lowered
.tolive'' he said almost in a whisper
That's ALL said Richardson, and the wit
ness was remanded to the penitentiary
western federation of miners, was the next
witness He told as TO the manner of organizs-
ton of the federation. He told how officers
were elected and how the secretary at nrst
was not a member Of the executive board, out
lately became such.
Senator Borah examined Boyce and laid the
fo,Inda ton for the introduction of articles In
the Miners Magazine Boyce said that the
publication was the official organ of the western
federation of miners. The hrst number OF the
magazine was identified. Boyce's official con-
pection with the western federation or miners
ceased in 1902. A number OF magazines were
offered as evidence for the purpose OF intro
ducing certain articles. Counsel for the defense
was given until tomorrow morning to inspect
the articles and court adjourned at S:15 p. III.
until tomorrow morning.