Shoshone journal. [volume] (Shoshone, Idaho) 1884-1931, 1907-08-02

The Haywood Jury brought in verdict Of not oov In tb
public mind however, little guilt OF the accused
The jury empanned try the legal merits
which often means entirely different basis
case This particular jury the defendant sp
hc murder Of Governor Seunenberg There the
minds Of the jury that the trail Of blood led directly from the
berg murder the headquarters the conspiracy Denver and that
at Denver there criminal lawyer Richardson by
who only also great in
his ability to advise and instruct them beforehand up
the responsibility reasonable minds of
jury the guilt any There could be not ea
sonabe doubt that the Seunenbeg murder planned
and that Harry Orchard truth there was reasonable
doubt raised to Just what particular individuals plot
The state has this trial leads directly
from the steunenerg gate the Bradley house mine the
Independence depot the bomb gate the murder
~ gregory and dozens OF lesser murders and crimes
quarters the conspiracy at Denver Just as reatedby Orchard
entering that ghouh place the trail under the manipulation the
cunning criminals hidden there has make it diff
cult to the charge against any particular individual The ea
onabe doubt element is made enough to trim
any Jury sa has tried OF these state of Idaho
has done its duty Orchard the mumuderor hired assassin
may be the only be punished while great criminals 90 free
But the American public seeing through the pdery
ees 70 the heart the conspiracy while acknowledges that
the Jury may have done its duty under its limitations still yer
de' on facts that is not the same that handed into
It's not for the Journal that Haywood guilty Down in
ms own heart he knows So do Meyer and Pebone Orchard
fair enough 70 say that vast number Of on
probably large majority Of those followed testimony beIve
that the guilty charged Gilman speaking also for
Juror Burns and Powell says that believed HAYWOOD
nocent that they voted finally aqutta against their own conv
ons ause they were satisfied that the instructions
verdict These fourth jury believed the accused to
q guilty And they voted that Time while knowing
that the state could bring ccnmstanal evdnceand tho
aony Of apee Orchard As there goLeween no tell
As letters no one who actually knew might have
been made between Orchard aid bis alleged employers for this other
innFaefs was he testimony
ganst several men ehoa confessed this no matter
~hS one e there few reasonable would have stood
W " hAs m accused On the evidence presented that
= spf~ent " convict for capital crime failed to prove
su bona any reasonable legal doubt incidental fact
= - = b personal endorsement Of Haywood official sanction Of his
fes The verdict under circumstances hard
y - ong an one Of guilty. about the only thing has settled
= 80 M @ ~ oi convicted Of numbering Frank stcunenberg
VIA shs aers opoy acknowledging their belief that Haywood a
~ SIN &c ffesunabls proportion Of per cent m
= ~ MA never have convicted any circumsan- m
IA 's a a9ass made heir before the trial was al
@ -" nay b what kind impression the accused c
~ ae re oarna while believing evidence that Ha ey
49, n A3t ~ Ian haze been obliged 10 inror
80 ~ geD BE- declared attitude 81 most 81 the -
~ ~ q ~ e q Idaho If that BE- vindcon or -ote ~ -
8 ay Pc sef such u looks much like jury had acted n,
~ N' 'ss l@ffoHs Plea 70 lei 100
9ns1ef ore Fn2 And believes that tic l
~ ~ = ass about that proportion but that ha
: ''''T 'F'''''"s 'ssoss o'ehafds- R