The Salt Lake tribune. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1890-current, 1907-04-12

out statement that would be official
1t was as follows:
II am told that it is Impossible TO tell
what any jury will do so | am attending
10 my ordinary affairs. but preparing for
the best. as 1t is simpler TO unpack my
things II necessary that ii would be 10
return here for them If the verdict is
favorable.
Il had a very good cold bath. The
bathroom always Is filed with fresh air
In the early morning, with the same tenn
perature as outdoors Next i mad weak
coffee and rolls, as usual. These details
must have interest plus. as they are often
mistold.-Harry Is, Thaw.
Jury Wants More Light.
The Jury asked Justice Fitzgerald TO be
allowed to examine the following exhibits:
Plan OF Madison Square Roof Garden
The letters from Thaw TO Attorney
Longfellow.
The Thaw will and codicil
The Comstock letter
Delmas's Hypothetical question.
Jerone's hypothetical question.
The fury also asked TO have the testi-
mony OF Meyer Cohen, one OF the eye
witnesses: for the people; read 70 then-
Justice Fitzgerald ordered 1t read.
Never Cohen is the witness whom Mr-
Delmas quoted having testified that
Thaw threw his arms OUT In the figure OF
a cross after killing White.
The Jury also asked that the testimony
OF Harry :. Blaise another eyewitness
OF the tragedy. he read to them. and this
was ordered done.
All the members OF the Thaw fan2i'y
were la court Thaw came In carrying
an armful of papers he had oeen ihocs-
triously reading.
The jury.s action was taken 10 'ndicats sl
there was stu a possibility OF NerulCl
being reached. though not soon
The testimony of Paul Brudy. the nre-
man who took the revolver from Tnaw
immediately after the killing, was next
rend to the Jury as was also the testi-
mony of Gordon Paxton, the engineer
OF the roof garden. ~
The action OF the jury IN asking Tor
the testimony of the eye witnesses OF the
tragedy led TO many con1ectures. OnA
NJ these was 10 the effect that the jury
wanted TO fix In It's mind either the ques-
ton OF dellberation and premeditatlon on
Thaw's part. or else the nationality or 1T
nationality of his acts. ,.
Brudy is the fireman VINO dlsarheo
Thaw. 49,,
The plan OF the roof garden was held
IN for the inspection OF the jurors as tbs
testimony was read TO them; .,
The action of the jury IN asking tGf
the particular exhibits and the tS teSu-
mony Indicated LED 10 much specnleIslVoh sV
as 10 what the trend OF their long dis
cussion had been.
Different Theories.
one Of the widely-discussed 1heories
was tha, the jurors either wanted Ia re-
fresh their memories as 10 testimony
reudlne to show either dcliberation or
premeditation upon the part OF nav. ,
or else they wanted TO have the story
of Thaws actions tho night OF the trag
edv rehearsed once more in order that
they might Judge as TO his nationality.
The suggestion Of the latter purpose
seemed 10 be given weight by the iact
tbat they desired to examine the letters.
the will and the codlcil brought Lorward
by the defense In support OF lis claim OF
II was generally conceded that serious
differences OF opinion had developed
among the jurors as 10 the evidence ana
that a verdict Of any sort was sun re-
mote. .,. ,.,. o,.o,,,
Indication OF confidence. He. OF an The
members OF his counsel and his family.
js stII honeful of favorable outcome
The best that his counsel expect is dis,
agreement OF the jury. They have feared
,bsre might be a compromise among them
on some lesser degree of guilt than muir
der In the first degree
The action Of the jury today IN calnng