The Washington herald., 1907-04-09
Circuit Court No. /.

JUSTICE WRIGHT.
Baseher vs. District Of Columbia; judgment On
verdict Plaintiffs attorneys. ]. F. scaggs and
Thompson a Laskey; defendants attorney, Z. H.
Thomas
DutteFz vs. McDTmott receiver; verdict for de-
PENDANT Plaintiffs attorneys. 7, A. Bowen, +, G.
HANDY. and T. 3. Belrend defendants attorneys
George +, Hoover aud g. a. Douglas.
Columbia National Bank Kuehlng; Judgment
by default Plaintiffs attorney. B. T. Leighton.
Thomas Parker: stipulation filed and trial b.
Court laegmeIt Tor plaintiff for sie0o appeal noted
BONO 1oo- Plaintiffs attorney, George p Hoover
defendants attorneys, Ralston q Siddons, b. W.
Parker. and John Ridout
Hurst vs.. Miller; motion for new trial granted
and set for trial April 10 Plaintiffs attorney
Edwin Forrest. defendants attorneys, Brandenburg
& Brandenhmg
Hight vs.. Moore; motion for new trial oyerruled
aud Judgment on verdict. Plaintiffs attorneys H.
s Matthews and +. A. Bowen, IT,, defendant S
attorneys, Birncy x Woodard.
Slater Taylor verdict fer defendant PLAINTIFF
attorney. l. a. Bailey; defendants attorneys. A 5.
& J. r. Taylor
Assignments for to-day:
No. SOL Whestley Va Georges. Attorneys. H.
Wuship Wheatey-Wilson & Barssdae.
No. 553. Elliott rs. New York Continental Jewell
Filtration Company Attorneys Tucker Kenyon.
Blackstone a Huidekoper=E II. Thomas
NJ So Walters vs.. Washington Railway and
Electric Company. Attorneys. Leckie, Fulton &
No Sc FlaLerty vs.. Flaherty. Attorneys. L. a.
Bailey-w. G. johnson.
No 563. swartzen Rheem & Hensey Company vs..
Lamb, Attorneys, Nelson Wson-John Ridout
No ISL Miller vs.. Washington and Gettyshurz
Railway. Attorneys. Chaplin Brown and George W
Drew Il. Lamer.
No l55. Barber & Ross vs.. Kinmel Attorneys.
Worthinston, Head Ffaiiey-John Ridout
No s7'1. Ls1tvoigt - Paul Attorneys. Charles
Poc-C L, Frailoy.
No 5g7 Buchanan ys. Washington Railway ana
Electric Company. Attomeys r II. MeNsiII--J. J.
Darlington
No. 5sa. Hornbioser vs.. George Washington Uni
yersiiy. Attorneys r. W. Hackett-W. C. Clephaue
and W. 4. Mattingy
Circuit Court No. 2.
JUSTICE ANDERSON.
Moore vs.. Loughnn: Judgment set aside Plain
tif's sttone3s. Douglass & Douglass, defendants
attorney Le5 Simmons.
Thomas IS. Washington Railway and Electric
Company; oH trial Plaintiff attorney. wilton J.
Lambert. defendants attorney, j. j. Darlington.
assignments "! To-Day
No I7ois. Clara w. Washington and southern
Railway Company. Attorneys, l. }. Aather-Mc-
kenney * fiaunery.
No. go Cover IS. southern Railway Company
Attorneys, Padgett FaHest-Hamilton. Colbert &
Hamilton
No. 81 Catholic University Of America rs. war-
gaman. Attorneys Hamilton Colbert & Hamilton
w. F. Msttingiy J. b. LameE, aud Arthur Peter.
No SIS Barnes Vs. Slater Attorneys Turner 4
Mtchel-George r. Williams
No. f66. Talbot McJem0tt. AttoFueys B.
+. Loight0n-J j. Darlington.
No. 3lA Dee vs. Life Insurance Company Il Viz
gina Attorneys, r. J.. Downing Robinson &
Robinson.
No. i7s. Nokes vs. Chase. Attorneys. L. J.
Mathew J. Lambert
No. p oliver vs.. Philadelphia, Baltimore aud
Washington Railroad. Attorneys. A. g. Worthing-
ton-McKeuncy & Flaunery
No iis Knickerbocker ". Willis. Attorneys. J.
J. Darlington Carlisle & johnson.
No. s5S Meriilst IS. Brennan Construction Com
Iany. Attorneys Merillat & Amhr1se-J j. Oar
lngton and Hamilton. Colbert & Hamilton
No. 5l2 Gamody Construction Company vs.
Stannzrd Attorneys. Z. Il. Thcmas-Hsmiltan
Colbert * Hamilton.