The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1907-04-11

Their nameless editor had merely q
few scratches on his face and the boy
who fought him had none, and lhaI
was the very reason why the District
Judge imposed a fine on the boys ne
is no more a thug than their name
less editor.
It is rather surprising TO me that the
Bow Wongs make such q lame excuse
by saying that they do not know what
We meant BY the words secret edict
(rnat chiu) These are the very same
words used by their principal leader
Kang, who claimed that he did ac-
tually receive the secret edict or mat
chiu, direct from the present ruling
Emperor, instructing him TO request
the people in foreign countries TO rem
der him protection; it is indeed ride
uIous for humble Bow Wong of this
Territory to boldly contradict the
words often used by their leader.
The Bow Wong Society is really
revolutionary organization and is in
correctly termed as the Chinese En-
pire Reform Associat ton. 1t has never
been organized under a charter from
this government; they, however, tried
their best TO secure one; but by a
protest from the former Chinese Con-
sui and after Que investigation, the
government of the Republic Of Hawaii,
rejected their application. Is this a
false report from the Anti-Bow
Wongs?
Poor Tang Tsai Chang was not
naval officer, killed during the China
japanese war as the Bow Wongs claim.
but he was actually killed during the
revolution in Hankow, as he was fool
ism enough TO be the fgurehead Of
Kang and LANG double faced lead
ers).
In reference to the assault upon the
Boycott union treasurer. do not con-
tend that he was attacked by his
staunch Bow Wong friends, but by the
subscribers TO the funa, on the ground
that he, through the bad advice Of his
Bow Wong friends, declined to the re-
funding of certain money.
I again say that il is indeed cow
ardly attack on the former consul and
his secretary for serious charges were
merely hearsay statements of an ex
parte. It is a great regret that the for
mer manager of the Bow Wong paper,
knowing that libel suit had been in
stituted against him, that he did not
bring a criminal charge against the
secretary: and after having served
three days in the Oahu Hotel oahu
Jai), he was promoted as head Of a
certain money lending association con-
sisting of from ten 10 fifteen members.
AS to the truth and yeracity Of this
gentleman I leave TO the opinion Of
the public and more especially TO our
Chinese people. I have one more word
to say in reference to this: can the
Bow Wongs or the son Of this para
mount gentleman tell US the name OF
the gentleman who forged several
prOmissory notes and rendered the
same TO the merchants who were at
that time members of the above nam
ed money lending association? The
Bow Wongs claim that il is not nee
essary to answer the question as TO
the existence of the Bow Wong Society
and the name OF the nameless editor
1 beg to say that there is no more
Bow Wong society in existence in this
Territory, sipce the 18th day Of Fec
ruary last, and the willy members of
this disbanded organization have since
formed a newly manufactured name
Tel kwok Hin Ching Wui" (The I'm
perial Constitutionausts Association.
They claim that the present Emperor
is now safe and needs no more protec-
ton from his loyal subjects" Yes, the