The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-10-11

company vs. W. K. Brown ct al. con demnation; Mrs. c. E. Bigsby vs. Willie E. Scruggs, damages; J. Jaffe Vs. Ala bama Great Southern Railroad com pany, appeal by defendant: A. M. Rob inson vs. St. Louis and san Francisco Railroad company, appeal by defend- ant; w. W. Ellis vs Jim Williams, ap- peal by garnishee; W. T. Bolton vs Joseph T. Merrill, assumpsit; Robert Garry X Co. Vs. Louisville and Nash Vile Railroad company, appeal by de- fendant Henry Cook Vs. St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad company ap- peal by defendant: Martin Clark vs. Annie Wynn. appeal by defendants Cleveland Crane and Car company vs. American Cast Iron Pipe company, damages w. F. Wilson vs. St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad company appeal by defendant; Bessemer Coal, Iron and Railroad company vs, South ern Hallway company, damages Bes-
 semer Coal. Iron and Railroad com pany vs. Louisville and Nashville Rail- road company. damages; F. Wiley vs.
 Birmingham Iron company ct al.. ap- peal by defendant; H. E. Gray vs. R.
 w. Massey, appeal by defendant; Alex
 Bailey vs. R. W. Massey. appeal by
 defendant; J. s. Bertram Vs. Brming- ham Railway, Light and Power com
 pany, appeal by defendants The $. Obermeyer company vs. Birmingham
 Steel and Iron company, assumpsit;
 Sun Publishing company vs. M. r. Prigot, appeal by defendant. In Judge Lanes division of the circuit court the case of the Suburban Realty
 and Investment company vs. Sloss-Shef field Steel and Iron company was on trial all day, and concluded at 6:3O, at which
 time it went to the jury. Judge Lanes
 court will convene at o'clock this morn
 ing, the following docket being set for
 today
 Annie Smith vs. Woodward Iron com- pany, damages; Nose Thompson vs. Woodward Iron company, damages: Henry Davis vs. Woodward Iron com
 pany. damages; Margaret Davis vs Woodward Iron company, damages; AL
 fred Jones vs. Woodward Iron company
 damages.
 City Court. In the first and second divisions of the city court yesterday the dockets were cleared early in the day. The follow ing eases were dismissed by the plain tiffs:
 Gus Marshall, adminstratrix. vs. Louis vile and Nashville Railroad company: Goldsten vs. Garry X Kartus; M M Nichols vs. Tutwer Coal and Coke com pany: Sheffield Steel and Iron com pany and Republic Iron and Steel com- pany; Elias Davis vs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad company; J. w. Tug gle vs. Republic Iron and Steel company; Theodore Henderson vs. St. Louis and san Francisco Railroad company; Maggie Henderson Vs St. Louis and San Fran cisco Railroad company; Joe Burke vs. Southern Baseball associations; Drennen & Co. vs. Clear Creek Land company; C. H. Allison vs. Brewer & Jones; B. F. Norvall vs. Tate Vines Hattie Brtton vs. Southern Railway company: Arthur
 Bell. pro ami. vs. Southern Railway conl-
 pany.
 In the third d:vision of the city count the case of IeIls Whaley vs. Sloss-Shef- field Steel an6 Iron company is on trial
 In the equity division of the city court the following docket is set for today: O. A. Burnside William H. May, N. E. Foster and J E. Foster. Lucinda Arthur vs. Pratt Mines Build ing and Loan association ct al.
 Joseph Love vs. Ezella Love. Bella I.isenba vs. Margaret M Parks ct al
 T. B. Walters ys. G. H. Walters. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad com pany vs. J. T. Alley ct al. chancery Court. In the chancery court yesterday a de- cree was rendered in the case of the Ala bama National bank vs. Coal City Coal and Coke company, allowing complainant to amend answer to cross bill.
 The case of the South and North of