Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1907-03-11
ATTY. LoNGFELLoW ON STAND
1t Was He Who Met the Lady in
The Case Upon Her Return
From Europe.
Dclmas Fighting Prosecuting Altorncy
M Every Point--on Both Sides Bat
tie is stubborn aud Determined.

Dist. Atty. Jerome began the real
Nvr,.lz of the orosecution--the offering.
,.i,. .,.,,..,I - t-., .,,.r,.,,o.
Va ,eSt''pVt'E ~
butlt up by IhaWS attorney NV
n, ,.os, t,.,m t,y,, hnn,,s ,rte,. ma tu,y-
.,.-3.t,,, ,,,.ist,.t
pane hau peeh e"'iPle'V'
simply of the testimony or eye VIII
nesses 10 the tragedy.
THE 6rs; ,,,i-npss called by MI Je-
ine hts' "i'"ss7 A'''l ~ -,
rume today was tfeqellch W. hVl's WI
low, one of the Thaw family attorneys,
who Was called by the defense some
d., a T., ;d.ns,f, rar,.in letters
,,,taIo,, l1a,-rv x THEW wrote 10 him
in ia0S Today Ar Jerome wanted
sip, IN identity a letter handed him by
Evelyn Nesbit Thaw upon hen arrival
from Europe late IN leo$; md.
MT. LonStehow lteI Mts' 'SN ,, q
the ship WI IN u dcckeq S'es: ~ IlS
Thaw upon the Witness seal'u. sai.l sIie
could not hN the gate or lIlV hA''ie
Mr.. Lonsteliow said ne had seed .'i., as a.,
Thaw attorney lor solH1 s""'S paw
10 June 70, lsoo- 49, s,y,,,a.,r,,
IJiu SVu telIteS" W r,nnr,as sgsinsf
~ ea.e y gNt s,t',,,, -, .,sl,,d Tet,oni,
IastIES y tttf'N atne S,t 1,,s+;ce
MI LSitphS %pJSNOu ~ SstS,,ess
Iltzgeralo rutau ne
Ny hrin naiH'e0 'f9 oe'
Nli Loi4s l ~ .,,r., snr,,ad nu This
!, Dts,oSa,,+ -;
a sr,;n Mr Del,nas objected. Jerome
said the contention Is that Thaw's
lea, 81 rshot Stanford White had
800 to ba,, and 10 other Young wo-
,Nas
M bsa haAn said that the alleged
acts of pe1,wersion By stanford White
aSfias To Yhe fIisy OF mis- mental rnhat-
apce. I want to show that he knew ail
about such thinga-that they We're set
To,.tb ln the ronl1,laint in this suit by
rrthei -r,,nn,as tho paypers OF which
were served on him"
THE Ethel Al''N- -, 49,.
Mrs Evelyn ThaW mao Vesei i,. ,- .i.a
she had been shown a COP! VI NY
Thomas affidavit by Anraha!tl lhu1. NJ
who said the case haa neelt u'u ~ on,-
cause OF the Chatacier VI
plainant 4,o a,.tr,c,
.. ~, .' are,lmert- quoted at some
Az ~. 49,, 1sTnn,e's statement at the
, ,satt;,.Iins =, the trial when Evelyn
pss'lili,lis "a r,mD the stand. that her
NAV We" ,'-.s r,ernissible only as
'estliilohs .'7 Its ~, mind and that
shoMlls t - eiino,ed ia contradict
ne "o"'n H"e
It, ,.,S Rim, ;. said pelnlas "we
we tolu H'i ts.,,so,, 10 birn attack.
would nav ~ ~ ,S,fe's story
ing the tTuth Oh Ais 10. s,,snned 1a.
NOW 90 1ou
rome ,.,i5 ~. .ccent
Yes, because you Mo ~ ~. he, a.
our onef 10 waive odi NJ neirnes
story began Ie $1,000 th,t MI Del.
mas arsuine'll Wv - a.rer+ nr Irxrelvn
at issue, II was the ellect , o. ~ s ,,ss
Neshit's story on Thsws n1ir'u TIC WAS
attempting 10 CONTRADICT -. r,.a,
II am not tr5-lns =" sho" me r Ina
Thomas acc .l-r,.', ,o,yJ he a col1nter
al fact. Anyway lhls poor sitt 'S ''"N
dead, ,.4.ntsa "a the reference
MI Dslihas opJ r,.; ,a ,,nor-', CHI o,d
to the Thomas eltl as poos ;n .1 an"
the statement tnal sle is e." 81. 49,
Mrs. Thaw hGrse.A tess s',se ,.i,I,drn
is dead, SAID Jerotlle' N'o
the ad>ecuVe poV,, ,,,re,,r,~,. r1,,,
IiiA" la that ,,,or. tbnu ,,vo
wears before Evelyn Thaw told Thaw
the story which Is said to have UNI
balanced his mind, the Knew All the eVll
practlses OF men In New york
Mrs Thaw herself says she was TOLD
the story Of Thaw tying a young wo-
man 10 a bed posi- and peaIlhs hoi,
That Is the story OF Ethel Thomas.
declared the district attorney.
Mr.. Delmas arose to protest. must
object To the learned district attorney
testlfying in this case and Deseech
him not to continue 20 give the Jury
as fact this understanding 81 the points
at ISSUE said Mrt Delmas-
Justice Fitzgerald Instructed the jury
to be guided only by the sworn testl-
mony OF witnesses,
The question was repeated as 10
whether tho papers III the E.neF
Thomas case were served upon ,rhaw
objection sustained ru'eo th'
court,
did there come INTO your possession
at any time letters written ny ms us-
PENDANT to Ethel rhomasg' asked Mr.,
Jerome,
Mr. Dellnas objected on the ground
that any such letters must have been
written prior to 1908 and therefore had
nothing to do Ni'h thN sanity or Tho
utItuAHnls