The farmer and mechanic. [volume] (Raleigh, N.C.) 18??-19??, 1907-05-14
Rates on Other ?
Not Affect.
CHARACTER OF &.
southcrn'e Atscm.t ts
Legislation ~ I.a@-f
Of Revenue SOLELY a..
Not Attack Ias.
gltutiouaIity al
situtionality ,1

Per -irg the rc
brought ~ tho
entoin the pu;tlnS "a
new rates cstab!.zrr.
and passenger sa;.
been constdsrahl"
what coursc would s
other railways 80 which
new schedules OF ra-rs
1; he's been sugRrvset
few days or at tho t.r-r
Ing, the Seahoard A.r
lantic Coast Lac a-t
roads affected. wou..
parties TO tho slll. - q
southern.
Speaking in this g-.sa..
cay n prominent a-tf.r#
had much experience
Cation said thAC ul
peculiar character ~
our could not BE-
be recalled that uAc ra-.a
the only D~ripus aeseu +
the Southern again
new rates IS that ;Nrr .r.
such n heavy roductl.u AL,
TO reduce their naru4n..
point of a Reasonable ...
fact cat be es~tabNsh.l. ..
come as 70 the Sou-heg.
constitutional, in 'AaE
deprivfng 81 OF fits .~..a.-
out dns process OF Iae
the equal protncrou ~ t.
In violation of the T-aufrr...
mont to the Constitute
ed States and tho rest 1s
must be shown positIvTr
road and by spGcitc s.,
the effect or tho acts .-.. "a
particular properly. Eee.
should be able 70 show s-
OF facts. fts showing raH.
another roud which. 90 mat .H.
OF an injunction, would . .
its own SUIT and a1dueo .-
enre TO show the uart.aa..r
the Legislation on It's hu.4s
This would not be taa @ ,
the acts attached from r.
OF their being void ah -.. .
son OF any rat1l defect t- ~
anything that wac ur..c
upon their face, Lrler. r s
co have been expected as -l
informed circles that Tho @
suit would be based uu f#,.a q.
ground, I'm which case tse H.4s
could have been I'm q pm r..
advantage OF any HuccH*
Il light have obtained .u Ha .-
AS II rs. any road ritat t- 4.
II out with the State must .. b. -
It's own separate uctluu-
II this view ~ correct. ttH
granted by Judge PritchaT. a.
only to Southern LGal~ay.
nhs0nca Of other similar Hut
operate 10 prevent The rr E
u < into effect on thu Gra- a. r.
ali other roads. although '# l
termination VIII be prae.
elusive Of all tho other Hre l
rnlngs OF the SuutlloF.
II the cOurt- d.agtI .-
the laws operate 60 cur dow 's "
on the Southern o. "a gr..
that OF reasonable prrtt M
there would be no way of a
other roads 70 their pro-
the meantime iIuTrf'.
question is purely upon 'a
Of whether the S%outheru i
obey the Inv and ~coutiuze E.. I'd. =
at a profit
Another point OF inte~a'
connection was tho suEEev-"r
rhe Comm.as!on IS relt -f| #t
20 DTomulgate tho e ra.
,ect OF the injunction prob.
from doing 50 Ia in relll- #
ton IN favor Of all other ra.
II Il hardly true ra#f '
her the inteld-ncut or to
but IL ft were tf
he Defendants named 4r tH'
ems auit would I'm all ur~aH'
ain a modification of ftt
at the time set rrr '.rH
pear and show causc viz
Ion should not De c~Dufr-"
Fearing. The date for tais
)eing June 2sth there 4-
inc for tie publicetiaa
10 all other roads fNgC '.
,rn-cyen II the IuI-rCrLaa
As to the contention 90.
bfIi Of coupiEf
mere fixing by the
maximum rate Of charga
alton OF the coHstitujiOr aT
lpon the right" or = ra|--
Is rates in the event thot
chow that FUcH
necessary IN order to ra
Enable profit, lawyer haf
paragraph ~as prrara--
reason Of an e4urEa E .r . "
White in the recent c"
connection case. JU@tIc" .
e remembered, In ughaI..'s
Il tho Corporation Corr
ng the making or tho
at a nominal Iosf. tack
that the op-ui0T .t.
renee 70 q question q f".'
c how his cxyrs-#.H-
,ecn construed into uuf..
contention might req
AZ q laWF"-
vas u sort OF a mat.
II Is well known Shat
lated grounds for Iu5Gr"
alleged irreguiarity g. t
acts, but the TACT '-
m made no such gg.-
'erce that the lcEia.-'..
II fail on the pure GI"''
nd the effect Of its pro-
y4l.ttEatf In. fH...