The Salt Lake tribune. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1890-current, 1907-05-19

CIdu ldWS SPSSill any WI 'oih
time To do assessment work after loca-
tion, and how long IS it3
ROBERT BONNEMORT.
/. Belongs to n. 2. No,
POCATELLO, May 15.-Will you
kindly state in your question column
next Sunday whether or NOT cousins can
marry IN Idaho2
1t is permitted by law.
Editor Tribunc.-Will you please an
swer the following questions: !, Did
Thomas Paine take an active part IN
what way1 2, Why is his name not
mentioned more prominently in our
historiesl ls it on account of his criti-
cisms Of the Bible? 8. What is thought
of those criticisms among Bible stu
dents of todays 4 Has any one at
tempted to answer themG An answer
to these questions will greatly obliGe.
A SUBSCRIBER.
/. Yes. az a writer for liberty and
Justice. 9, For the reason. partly, that
he wrote against the Bible; but more,
been obscured in favor of those who
did things; Otis. Witherspoon, Wilson
and others have suffered the same un-
lust neglect. :, Bible students OF to-
day give due credit to the former stu
dents, but for the most part are work
ing on different lines. 4. There have
been many purported answers to Payne,
as there have been to Ingersoll and
others.
CLIFTON. Utah. May ii. When
mining district is regularly organized
under the laws Of the State of Utah,
can a locator of mining claims record
the same with the County Recorder
without first recording the original 10.
cation notice upon the district recordsf
g IL so, would il not be the duty of the
County Recorder TO send transcript of
such record to the district recorder TO
the end that tho county and district
records should correspond In case the
claim or claims should be litigated' B.
In this case. who should pay the district
recorder for his services in placing such
claims upon his record? j. II. under
the law, one pcrosn is permitted 10 re"
cord his location notice with the County
Recorder only, why would 1t not be
equally lawful for another person to
record his location notice with the dis
trict recorder only' 5. Under the pres
ent law, in the reorganization of old
districts, after their records had been
taken away, what was the object OF
the State in paying onc-half of the eX-
pense for making true and correct
transcripts and the county paying the
other half, if il was not for the purpose
of having the county and district rec,
ords identical' The above questions
are not asked from idle curiosity. but
for the reason that certain parties in
Clifton mining district have been re
cording their location notices with the
County Recorder of Tooele county. who
in answer to a letter from the district
recorder, states that che has received
and recorded - such claim notices. This
leaves the prospector without any way
of knowing from the district records
whether this or that claim has been
properly recorded or not at all. as well
AS making the district records absolute
" worthless The above is submitted
at the request of property owners of
Clifton district, G. a. III.
], The proper way is TO file two no.
tices of location with district recorder
and pay the fee of 75 cents due County
Recorder. .. The law provides that the
location notice should be fled first with
the district recorder, but the abstract of
title Is made from county records, aud
if the record is complete, 1t is doubtful
if mining location would be held IN
valid. Technically speaking, there is
not strict compliance with the law,
and if an innocent third party were in
iured bv the failure to comply, the To-
cation might be held invalid, 1t is bet
ter to file the two notices with the dis
trict recorder. B. Probably the person
who files the notice. 4. In order TO
show title one must get his notice on
the county records. 5. The object was
to have them the same.
SALT LAKE CITY, May 14,-WilI
l. IL. s 80
last fall. OH the mortgage taxa Also
please give the present address of An
drew Carnegie. in next Sunday Trib-
unc. AN OLD SUBSCRIBER.
G) The result was the adoption OF
the amendment favorable TO the tax.
(2). Carnegie's address is No, 2
East o1st street, New York City.
SALT LAKE CITY, May II, 1907
Will You kindly inform me through
your columns next Sunday, what Off
cial L shall have to appear before to
declare my intention to become a nat
uralized citizen, and where is he To-
cated1 BY so doing you will oblige.
Yours very truly, FRED sHILLETo.
Before the Judge of the Federal
court, by preference, in the Federal
building, corner Main and Market
streets, between Third and Fourth
South.
SALT LAKE CITY, Utah, May 10
Please insert in your Sundays ques-
ton and answer column harmless
remedy in which TO remove superhuous
halr upon the arms.
Hoping to read it in your Sunday S
paper and thanking you in advance.
A READER
We don't know Of any.
LEHI, Utah, April p. l9O7.-Can
| the United States Government issue a
| patent for a mining claim which is To-
/ Gated on a school section, or is it nee
essary to purchase from the State7
! ~ What arc the principal changes
made by the new mining Law in the
old one and when does it go into eff
fect7 MINER.
a. Technically speaking, If at the
time of the final approval of the sur
| vey, the land within the school section
is known to be mineral IN character
the land does not pass to the State,
but remains a part of the public min.
eral domain. Thousands of patents have
| becn issued in school sections and If