The Salt Lake tribune. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1890-current, 1907-06-22
,formaIly Rests i'm First of Steunen-
,tg Murder Trials and Motion to
Dismiss is ForCibIy
Argued
RIFLES THAT THE ISSUE
MUST GO BEFORE THE JURY
/ is Bitterly and Fiercely Denounced by
Attorneys for Man Whose Life
is at Stake


.r,losed its case against Viii
|V,ruood. charged with the
\ Fank Stcuncnberg. the de
y 40 unsuccessful attempt TO
II he court an order direct
|rT 10 acquit the prisoner.
-sds ruling, which requires
9 10 meet with evidence the
|is State has presented. was
Bis 0 clock and it was then
ttnt HAYWOOD s counsel
g, their opening statement
a thcir first testimony on
|,u.
d trial opened this morning
-lsted that the record should
\ lie date Of the draft sent
~ to Jack Slmpkins late i'll,
Dssmber 81 and after that
E'ion proceeded to show by
-6zg expert that George Pet
Ia the names of "'J Wolff
~ made TWO rpmltianccs
10 Harry Orchard al San
Through the Pacific Postal
snpsny in the fall of 1904.
rslt called Jim Scahorn, a
q trader. who sworc that he
y and buggy TO Orchard in
= 1905, and identified Hay
u Of the men who rode with
4fter that the defense ad-
b 10 June, 1909, HAYWOOD
Steve Adams at Ogden and
ltessaTy showing had been
record tbe prosecution for
kat From Courtroom.
na for an instruction 10 the
|f.ll was by agreement pre-.
he afternoon session, and
Fzs sent back to the Jury
= hearing of the argument.
L. F Richardson made the
sEument in support of The
knp, carefully.prepared and
tsh, He took for his guide
htute which forbids con-
Z The nncorroborated testi-
= aeeomplice and quoting
nllss In support of his con.
here must be convincing
entirely independent Of
y Of the accomplice, made
OIL all The testimony Of.
astlared that none Of the
Elld stand without the sup
H.srd 8 story, and that the
rRallr forbade IT'S accept
lsese circumstances. He also
ihs testimony Of Orchard
slowing that in any way
ni'Sood with tine crime and
.'rte forbade conviction un-
circumstances
chins corroboration.
snh, who alone spoke for
napsa with Ike force and
le' haywood 8 connection
E1pendentlv shown and
~. testimony mad been cor
independent circumstances
Ne also submitted a
@slt 10 show that the
alaollshed the existence of
,',splracy in which Hav.
PARTICIPANT, and in which
psy,.sneloped the alleged con
inssNoone and Simpkjns.
rlfow, who closed, plea ded
- nor a shred Of evidence
Speele q OF standing without
thread Of Orchard s
5'sln H. II aud that the plain
~. - iosno statute made the
.'ur' clear. He ridicuIed
~, general conspiracy and
y the most liberal al
s.e s@ade for the entire show
s1te @ that il would not
r,S against the prisoner
u. Vm'sslon 10 the Jury,
Of Draft Fixed.
sss ne, was resumed az go
,its ou, ., I9re than 100 people
outside the bar. OF these
d bis Witnesses. Haywood <
1. tr,stn ,s Immediate right and
n si i ~ : sister. were the
'Ie5 s,s, IVY family present
|er,I,nnS. delivered q lcnpthv
tfo,s demurrer in one OF
~ INC regular term of
|, 'stsS 'ssG Ito to proceed. Senator
5,srbi. 'hot the State had re.
rll banL, L,oiorma'ion from the
e7s of ., VI Denver filing In
!. IA 60 uns drafts whish have
y besr' '.ioeMce and on which
4at ~ punched out by the
r. WIN ls draft was for 500
.sb.r !, ina, II bears the
oosoo. N was drawn
Ahist n slmpkIns hy Hay-
Ho4. pp'onuced y In court from,
shlIa r orchard. received
Thai" IN isil ct Caldwell
klis -, had been semi ~
~ S''d that he had asl,ed
3 Emitted prima facIa ths,
a eyISsnr Ger p and tlle date
p cis'ss cisIy The former clark e.
" Nrii. ~ ~ Denver, iastiiieG
sss ( Ds,nGrs., me ,alegraphic none o1. ,
sy mlssIa. - orchard whar
. o' IN San Fran.
% usliosa'as'orney Of Boise
He ea va as an expert il
-
s'''srs on 1iS" the letter eS Go%SSy. paoly.