The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1907-06-26

1859.
Moses II. orinnrIl Dewitt c. Nttlejohn
Robert Emmett Philip Dorsheimer
Charles Cook Preston King
william NJ. Evsrts John L. sehoolcrsft
Preston King Henry r, Selden
1884,
Henry J. Raymond Lyman Tremain
Daniel S. Dickinson Preston King
1858.
Daniel Z. Sickies Charles Andrews
Lyman Tremain D, d. S. Brown
1871.
Gerritt Smith William F. Butler
william orton Horace B. ClAhln
James n. Matthews Stephen Mofitt
1875.
Alonzo B. Cornell Theodore NJ. Pomeroy
Andrew D. White james n. Matthews
Roscoe conkling Chester A. Arthur
Alonzo B. Cornell James D. Warren
1884,
Andrew D. White John l. Gilbert
Theodore Roosevelt Edwin Packard
1885.
Frank Hiscock chauncey NJ. Depew
Warner Miller Thomas c. Plat
isa2.
Frank Hiscock chAuncey NJ. Depew
Thomas c. Plat Warner Miller
1895,
Thomas c. Plat ChSuncey NJ. Depev
Warner Miller Edward Lauterbach
1900.
Thomas c. Plat Theodore Roosevelt
Chauncey NJ. Depew Benjamin B. odell, Jr.
1904.
Thomas c. Platt Benjamin B. odell, Jr.
Chauncey NJ. Depew Frank s. Black
In 1880 Governor CORNELL was de-
..--l - llLo-, -, liz oNGntol ltfiaa
and JACOB w. HoYsRADT occupied his
seat in the convention as alternate.
This question has been frequently heard
of late: Are Mr.. PLATT. Mr.. DEPEw, Mr..
ODELL and Mr.. BLACK TO be reelected as
delegates at large for the State to the ma
tional convention next year? This other
question has also been asked: Are Mr..
PLATT, Mr.. DEPEw, Mr.. 0DELL and Mr..
BLACK to be supplanted by four other
Republicans whose names have not been
hitherto mentioned? Still another in
quiry has been heard, as follows: Would
the divergent forces and cliques in the
party organization be able TO reflect
Mr.. PLATT, Mr.. DEPEw, Mr.. ODELL and
Mr.. BLACK as the four delegates at large
for the State? Mr.. PLAT and Mr.. ODELL
are supposed TO be opposed to President
ROOSEVELT. Mr.. DEPEw has spoken up
for the President. Mr. BLACK is very
silent about the President. Mr.. BLACK
has been in the background since he
nominated Mr.. ROOSEVELT for President
In the national convention of 1904.
At the recent meeting OF the Republican
State committee Mr.. ODELL was instru-
in amending a resolution offered
by Mr.. WOODRUFF whereby all Of Gov
HpoKEsS policies as recommended
in his inaugural message 10 the Legis-
lature we're Endorsed by the committee.
Mr.. WooDRUFF's original resolution pro-
posed to indorse only the Governors
public service commissions bill. Careful
observers then derived the impression
ODELL wanted to hoist himself
back into political responsibility by
means OF HUGHEs's spotless reputation
and strength with the people. A few
minutes later, when Mr.. ODELL offered a
resolution calling upon the State CON-
to indorse Governor HUGHES for
President next year, he was defeated
by the vote of 81 TO 4. Mr.. ODELL X
this resolution by saying Il only
it in order to put that Federal
office holding crowd on record
Is the attitude Of the party organiza-
ton Of the State in the Presidential con-
vention to be determined by patronage,
nithar Eadaral or Stata2 Political math-
ematicians are now at work in IN effort
to ascertain which species Of patronage,
Federal or State, is likely to prevails |