The Montgomery advertiser., 1907-07-03
PIZETTI WILL HAVE TO SERVE Convicted For Inhuman
 Crime. NEAL RIGBY TURNED DOWN Mrs. Griffin Loses Out in Boultier
 Will Litigation. Sseers Recs.ve.i.s |. Novemser Jus tssss ,Be1seve TAsy win Have De- siaea All Cases Before HisA
 Judicial Beay.
NEAL IGBY TURNED DOWN

Dan Pinetti. an Italian of Mobile, will have to serve out his sentence of ptnety-nine years for an inhuman crime, of which his daughter was the vtctim. under g ruling of the Supreme Court made yesterday.
 The court had already decided tho case of Pixetti. It came from the City Court of Mobile. The Italian had been convicted of revolting crime and his daughter was the chief witness against him. The sentence of the court for Pixett was ninety-nine years in the penitentiary. The Supreme Court af- firme6 the decision of the lower court. The Italians lawyers made another try. however, and sought to get the case opened with rehearing, but the Supreme Court yesterday denied that application.
 The court declined to grant re- hearing In the case of R. May Grimm against the Working Womans Home. The lower court. which was the City Court of Montgomery. had decided the case in favor of the Woman's Home, and 1t had been affirmed by the Su- preme Court. The local controversy grew out of the will of L. E. Boultier, an aged photographer. The will left his small estate to the Woman's Home. 4 second will was produced which named Mrs. Griffin as beneficiary, but fhte will was successfully attacked.
 The court refused also to grant a rehearing to Neal Rigsby. the Fillmore County murderer. Rigsby yas con- victed of the murder of William Mo- Cain, a Deputy Sheriff, and given q life sentence. His case had been pre- vtousIy brought to the Supreme Court and affirmed.
 Tn all the court yesterday overruled fifty-eight applications for rehearing. Seven applications of this nature were granted. By agreement eight applica- lions were continued.
 The action of the court on the ap- plicatfohs before it was as follows:
 Applications for rehearing in the following eases were by the Supreme Court overruied:
 B. Broughton. as receiver, vs. ). D. Ehivers (and cross apeaD appeals from Monroe Circuit Court; heretofore af- flrmed.
 Paris Benjamin vs. Archer W. Slaughter. ct al, appeal from Baldwin Circuit Court: heretofore affirmed.
 Jacob Tannenbaum vs. Gus Rehm. appeal from Mobile Circuit Court; here tofore afirmedsw 9 @ 4&H
 Dan Pizxefti VI. the State of Ala bama appeal from Mobile City Court; heretofore affirmed.
 Edinburgh h-American Land Mortgage Co, Ltd. ct al, vs. William Grant; heretofore reversed and rendered in part and in part affirmed.
 Bessemer Coal. Iron and Land Com- many vs. Samuel Doak, appeal from Bibb Circuit Court; heretofore revers- ed and renianded.
 Bessemer Coal, Iron and Land Com pany vs Jennie Doak. appeal from Bihb Circuit Court; heretofore reversed and remanded.
 David Fleming vs. Josie !. Walker. ct al (and cross-appeaD, appeals from Montgomery City Court. heretofore on original appeal reevrsed and rendered and on cross-appeal affirmed.
 Alabama Terminal and Improvement Company, ct al. vs. Hall & Farley, Trustees, etc, ct al. (and cross-ap- peai), appeals from Montgomery Chan cery Court, heretofore on original ap- peal affirmed and on croas-appeal re- versed and remanded.
 R. May Grimm vs. working wo- ynnr'a Home Association, appeal from Montgomery Probate Court; heretofore affirmed.
 Ciffxens' Bank of Dyersburg Va, J. C. Haas 6 O.. appeal from Mont gomery Circuit Court; heretofore af- nrnaed DowdeIl and Simpson, JJ.,
 L and. N. Railroad Company vs. W. l.. Perkins. Admr.. appeal from But Ter Circuit Court; heretofore reversed and remanded.
 n6siazie M. Palliser ct al. vs. Home ereiephone Company ct al. appeal from Mobile Chancery Court; heretofore af-