The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-11-07
RECORD OF THE COURTS

RECORD OF THE COUKIS
 The usual routine of business went on in the courts yesterday. Yesterday morning at 7.So o'clock the jury in the | case of C. T. Layendar ys. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company re- 1 turned a verdict for the plaintiff for $l2Oo. 1 In the case of Fred Anderson, pro ami, vs. Birmingham Railway Light and Power company the jury returned yer | dict for the plaintiff for $250. The plain tiff was little negro boy who had his foot cut off while attempting to board car.
 Cases are on trial before Judge Lane, Judge Nesmth and Judge sharpe
 Circuit Court. In Judge Coleman's division of the cir cult court yesterday in the case of Joe Landgraf. pro ami, vs. Pratt Consoli- dated Coal and Coke company the plain tiff obtained a consent judgment for S4OO.
 The case of Ralph Caravella vs. C. c. | Tetherow, C. F. Camp and J. M. Perkins was concluded and went to the jury as | court adjourned.
 The following docket is set in Judge | Coleman's division of the circuit court l today:
 E. H. Andrews vs. John D. Dryer, as- sumpsit: Birdie May Crenshaw vs. First | National bank of Birmingham, assump sit J. D. S. Davis vs. Mrs. s. D. Fraley, sssumpsit; Lee J. Marx vs. Brown Bros. & Co.,, assumpst.
 In Judge Lanes division of the circuit court the case of J. H. Triple vs. Henry Jackson, ct. al., was on trial when court adjourned.
 The following docket is set in Judge Lanes division of the circuit court today:
 Jefferson County Savings bank vs. Ten nessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company, assumpsit; Citizens Life Insurance com- pany vs. w. D. Paris. assumpsit; w. D. Paris vs. Jefferson county, appeal by de- fendant.
 City Court. In the first division of the city court yesterday Judge Ferguson cleared off his docket early.
 In the case of the Pettyjohn company vs. R. E. Cooper, plaintiff obtained judgment for $226.7O.
 The cases of the Lathrop Lumber com pany vs. Henry F. Pool and Billie Jar rett vs J. W. Lindsay were dismissed.
 The following docket is set for trial in the first division of the city court today:
 Moore & Handley Hardware company vs. James W. Hawkins, appeal by defen- dant; Nashville Railway and Light com pany' vs. w. E. Kelley, assumpsit; liar gedin McKittrick Dry Goods company vs. Star Cahaba Coal company, assumpsit; State Mutual Life Insurance company vs. J. T. Palmer, garnishment on summons; Hood ellding x Co.,, ct al, vs. Moore & Evans, ct al, assumpsit; Robert Manuck, | ct. al, vs United States Fidelity and Guaranty company of Baltimore. dam ages.
 In the second division of the city court yesterday the case of w T. Norris vs. Birmingham Belt Railroad company was concluded and resulted in verdict for the plaintiff for $i00
 The case of J. P. Mcclure. pro ami, vs. Woodward Iron company is on trial.
 The following docket is set in the sec ond division of the city court today: Will Edwards vs. Western Union Tele- graph company. damages; T. M. Dens- more vs Peoples Home Telephone com pany, damages Mrs. Sallie Edwards vs. Western Union Telegraph company; Anthony Dietline vs. Louis Gelders, dam ages
 In the third division Of the city court a consent judgment for s200 was rendered In the case of Annis Sims vs. Birmingham Railway Light and Power company The case of Maggie Robinson vs. West ern Union Telegraph company was passed for settlement.
 The case of Dan Chamblee vs Sloss
 
 trial.
 The following docket is set in the third l division of the city court today: Mrs. Lizzie Gaylor vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, dam ages; Charles NJ Giles vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, dam ages; Robert c. Griffith ys. Western Union Telegraph company, damages; E. B. Mitchell, administrator, vs. Pratt Con eoI;datad Caa1 nomDany damnVee In the equity division of the city court the following docket is set today: I America O. Burnside ct al. vs. Charles N. McGrady Henry McLemore vs. Ida l McLemore; Moody Grammar vs. Leila ! Brannon Tomme Lou Wilson vs Grth Wilson, Mrs. Nellie Mills vs, Alfred Southall Mills: J. w Warren vs. May | Warren
 Chancery Court. 1 In the chancery court yesterday the following cases were dismissed; R. R. Posey vs. Vadie Posey; Nora Lee vs. i John Lee; Charles w. Ellis vs. Ida Ellis. l In the case of Woodlawn, a municipal l corporation, Ys. J. A. Durham, a mo- ton of complaint to take further testi- mony was allowed and case continued to 1 Saturday, November IS; the complainant to pay all costs accruing since october F. In the case of Arthur w. Massey vs.
 
 pleas for insufficency. Mrs. J. T. Walker filed a bill against J. W. Stephen seeking to cancel con tract of sale and certain promissory notes given for the purchase of certain prop erty. .
 The following docket is set in the chan cert court today:
 Eugene McElvain vs. Nettie McElvan; C. F. Gober vs. Lou Ella Gober; Will liam A. Blythe vs. Winton B. HarrfS ct al; Walter Hoffman vs. M. R. McNeil; J. R. Moore vs. Robinson s. Noar; Veitch Young Produce company vs. Mrs. A. NJ, Lovelady; Rufus H. Hagood vs. Thomas \ s. Smith; James Foster vs. Lula Foster; Matilda Allen vs. l.. K. Moss ct al.
 Criminal Court.
 The case of Fred Burke, charged with murder, was on trial in the first division of the criminal court yesterday. The state rested after concluding its evi- dence about o'clock. The trial win be resumed this morning and will prob ably go to the jury this afternoon.
 Should the Burke case be concluded before the time for the adjournment of court, the case of Arthur Allen, charged 1 with murder. will be taken up.