The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-12-17
RECORD OF THE COURTS

Owing to the absence of Judge Nesmith, who is still confined to his home on ac- count of illness. the first division docket in the city court was assigned to Judge -Senn; Judge Ferguson took up the sec ond division jury docket and Judge Sharp presided in the third division. Special Judge Hami is still engaged in the trial of the B. r. Pool Investment company ys Sloss-Sheffield Steel and Iron com pany and will probably finish about noon tomorrow
 The dockets in the city court were cleared by F o'clock.
 consent judgment for $2OO for the plaintiff was rendered in the case of Hannah Teford vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company.
 A consent judgment for $100 for the plaintiff was rendered In the case of Charley Telford against the same defen- dant.
 In the third division of the city court a consent judgment for $50 was rendered in the case of Frederick Greer vs. the Southern Railway company. Several cases were, dismissed.
 In Judge colemans division of the city court the case of Mary White vs. Jack Clay was on trial. The case will go to the jury this morning.
 In Judge Lanes division of the circuit court judgment for $250 for the plain tiff was rendered in the case of Julia Dowdell vs Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company
 In, ha nf Iat mi. mingham Railway, Light and Power company consent Judgment for the plaintiff for $500 was rendered.
 The case of George Ausbrook vs. Sloss- Sheffield Steel and Iron company result ed in verdict for the defendant.
 The case Of Henry J. Smith Vs. South ern Railway company will be taken up this morning.
 Circuit Court Docket.
 The following docket Is set in Judge coeman's division of the circuit court today:
 Isaac Spencer vs. St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad company, damages; Phil Brandon vs Alabama Great Southern Railroad company, damages; Morris -Karples vs. ST. Louis and San Francisco Railread company, damages; W. D. Henderson vs. Alabama and Blr- mingham Air Line Railway company, as- sumpsit: o. H. White vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company. damages.
 The following docket Is set in Judge Lanes division of the circuit court today:
 Jeff Manning vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron da Dato Manning, pro ami, vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company damages; James Nickerson, pro ami. vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company, dam ages; ". k. Strawn vs. Birmingham Rail- way, Light and Power company, dam ages; Robert F. Thomas vs Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, dam ages
 City Court Dockets.
 The following docket is set for trial in the first division of the city court today:
 Arthur Clark vs. Joe Mariscano. appeal by defendant; Ida F. Verdler ys. Bir- mingham Railway, Light and Power Fcompany, appeal by defendant; Rafealia Barranco vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; M. c. Reynolds Lumber company vs. George Pagan, assumpsit; c. B. Spencer vs. A. J, Morelock. appeal by plaintiff; George Bon durant vs. Matte Watkins ct al, admin istratrix. assumpsit; Fl. s. Clayton vs. E. s. Ball Lumber and Coal company. assumpsit; Calvin H. Green vs. Western Union Telegraph company, damages; warren Fox ys St. Louis and San Fran