Burlington weekly free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1866-1928, 1907-09-05
COUNTY COURT OPENED.
Disposition of Cases When Dock.
ct Was Called Yesterday. =
Hearings In Suits against the United
stntcs Fidelity and Guaranty Conn
pnny--RosnIyn Duchnine vs..
r. l.. Ahcarn To-day.

county court convened at the court
house yesterday morning. Judge
George NJ Powers of Worthwhile pre-
siding Prayer was offered by tho
Rev Dr. c. w Brown. sheriff Allen
| made tho opening proc1amations.
The docket was called and the fol-
lowing entries were made in the cases
set for trial by jury:
+. 1Iowcs Co. VS.. George NJ. Delaney,
apt, debt on Judgment. Continued.
]. H. Lamplough VS.. Palmer Hunt,
apt. debit on judgment. Doubtful.
X, NJ. Conant VS. town of Richmond,
petition. Doubtful.
Tho Old Fec Hive VS.. Bauman &
Sporting. apt. assumpsit. Trial.
Lucy Ann Martin vs.. Antoine and
Maxine Godettc. assumpsit. With
court.
Albert W. Relka and wife VS.. Martin
+. Allen. action on case. Trial
Mary NJ. strong VS.. Darlington
Traction company, action on case.
Trial.
Mary LOCO, admx VS. American
Wooden company. action on the case.
Trial
Rosalvn DuChainc VS. Thomas r.
Ahcarn, action on the case. Trial.
John G. Alger VS.. Fred AlEer, alien
alton of affections. No trial.
H. r. Walker, ct al VS.. II. A. BAILEY,
apt, assumpsit. Trial.
United states of America VS.. United
States Fidelity and Guaranty company,
assumpsit. Trial, motion to dismiss.
Joseph Cross VS.. Richardson & Bur-
CESS. assumpsit Trial.
NJ. T.. Kelley VS.. l. \. Chase and ],
II. Allen, assumpsit. Trial.
Frank Brand and w. y. Finney vs..
l. ]. Witherel, assunpsit and breach
of trust. Trial.
Michael and Bridget Callahan vs, city
of Burlington, action on case. Trial.
L. $. Of America for use and benefit
of Elias Lyman Coal company VS.. I. $.
Fidelity and Guaranty company, as
sumpsit. Trial stand on demurrer.
NJ f. Kelley VS.. l. \. Chase and
James IT, Allen. assumpsit. Trial.
Louis c. Kertzmer, apt. VS.. Marian
V. Messmer. debt Trial
Cornelius NJ Brownell VS.. Charles +.
Burnham, action on case. Trial.
Sylvester A. Ploof VS.. Henry W.
Putnam. action on case. With court,
Stands on demurrer
'.
William Guyette and Edward Guyette,
trespass. Settled.
A. A. Crcssmore vs. s. b. Howard,
apt, assumpsit. Passed
william Cayca VS.. Lewis Colodny,
assumpsit Trial.
Burlington Paper Stock company vs.
H. Diamond, nssumpsit. Trial.
George G. Mears, npt. VS.. George Z.
Stratton. book account. With court.
In re Abigail Munson's estate, Jehial
c. Munson. apt, appeal from commits
sioners Trial.
Fred r. Bixby va. Napoleon Couture
and Alexander Couture, apis, assunlpsit.
Trial
l.. D. Coats VS.. George l.. Story, apt,
special assumpsit. Trial
Esther Buck VS.. Matthew and Bird
get league. apis. assumpslt. Passed.
Town of Bolton VS.. Town of Hunt
ington, assumpsit. Settled
Nellie Cross VS. Thomas stone, has-
tardy. Trial.
]. 4. Phillips VS. Napoleon Frenette,
Islander, Trial.
Casper Berry & Co, VS.. W. b. Reeves,
apt. and f. II. Parker trustee apt, as
sumpsit. Passed.
Arbucklc Company apt. vs.. T. D.
scutakcs, general assumpst. Trial
Swift Company VS.. c. II. Howard,
apt, trovcr. Trial
Laura Kirby VS.. Jeh'el Munson and
Clarence y. Caswell, assumpsit Trial.
strong Hardware Co. VS.. Owosso
Carriage g. Sleigh Co., and trustees,
assumpslt. Trial doubtful.
Victor Plant VS.. Michael Cavage, re-
p,cvin. Trial.
Michael Cavage VS.. Victor Plant and
Selma Plant, action on case Trial.
Harry r. Thomas vs. Central Yer
ment Railway Co, action on the case,
Trial.
James A. Hanley VS.. Earl z. Nor
gan, action on case. TRIAL.
Town of Richmond VS.. Charles W
Howe, trespass. Trial.
Oliver LcMay by next friend VS..
Aughtney Parizo, trespass, Stands on
demurrer.
Joseph w. Farley VS.. Albert c. Col
Inns. assumpsit. Trial.
Oliver LeMay, Jr., by next friend VS..
Thomas Parizo. assumpsit. Stands on
demurrer.
Archie G. Dixie VS.. Rutland Railroad
company, action on case. Trial
At the afternoon session the grand and
petit jurors were sworn and the grand
jury retired to take up It's work T. c.
Lyon is foreman Of the grand jury
There were two hearings in the cases
of the United States for use and benefit
OF J. G. Strait & Son. The L. s Fidelity
and Guaranty company, and the United
States for use and benefit Of the Elias
Lyman Coal company, VS., the L. S. FL
deity & Guaranty company Both Of
these actions are brought to recover the
value of unpaid claims against the T.. H.
Deniston company, contractors who built
additions at Fort Ethan Allen and who
subsequently failed. The L. S, Fidelity
g. Guaranty company furnished the bond
for the Deniston company.
In the first mentioned case, the motion
to dismiss the amended declaration was
denied The second case stood on demur-
rcr. The court overruled the demurrer
and allowed the plaintiff to amend; the de-
PENDANT Is to plead over and is to have
two weeks in which to plead. The first
mentioned case stands IN the same way
The first jury case will be taken up this
morning. being that of Rosalyn Duchainc
vs.. Thomas F. Ahearn, In this case the
plaintiff seeks to recover for alleged neg
ligence on the part OF the defendant in
selling some percussion caps to her son.
OYSTERS IN JELLY ARE A DELI
CIOUs NOVELTY.