The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1907-11-29
NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS.
BEATEN IN FOOTBALL ZANE M
A SCORE OF II no 4.
Pennsylvania Men Rally ln Fine style for
Their Flnal COntest n Make Telling
Use of the Forward Passive Touch
downs 10 Dine GOal From the Field.

ball at practically all stages and IN a ma.
yorty Oh points brought another Pennsyi-
vania victory and Cornell downfall ON
Franklin + cid to-day. The long string
of triumphs for the Quaker at the expense
y; ute ltllHcan was increased by a game
which this time ended with a T. TO Z SCORE,
Notwithstanding all their reputed strength,
speed and skill the Comedians we're out
played from the ousss.: over two-thirds
vi the batting was Ina their territory on
lhe soggv gridiron on which the contest
was decided. Tho strength. speed and
skill were not with the Cornellians-iC was
the Pennsylyauians who we're the better
equipped ia these essentials. They also
knew more football. AMI the Comedians
fell Tar below expectations. They were a
big DISAPPOINTMENT.
Cornell played better football in the second
than ~ the first half. but at no time. with
one exception. WAS she near to scoring by
the touchdown method. COrnell's field goal
came Just before the end OF the game. but
the visitors never threatened to make a
serious dent in Pennsylvania lead. The
latter made "a touchdown 10 zach half and
they were assailing Cornell's goal constantly
in the first half and frequently in the second.
DhN " IAANR bNhAhNNR ~ AANn
in the first half the Quakers would have had
at least one more touchdown. The 5000
spectators sero doubly surprised-st Cor
uelI's inability 10 do much Of anything on
the offence and at Pennsylvania snappy,
spirited and. compared to Cornell. polished
play. The Quaker team ived up TO tradi-
tion by finding itself at its best for its biggest
game by rallyiDg for the finale.
IT., F.rvs,wl v,aa. .va a vnauga..yra that
had an immenss influence ON the re suit.
Pennsylvania worked il for great gains
and worried the Comedians increasingly
with a play in which the latter hitherto
have been very proficient. But only once
or twice did Cornell DO anything with
the forward psss to-day. while for Penn
~sylvania IL was largely responsible for the
victory.
W PASS A FACTOR.
Not in n game 80 far this ssason has
one team used the forward pass so much
or so well. With three men making the
play and with the man doing the throwing
standing far pack of his scrimmage line.
the ball was hurled for exceptionally long
distances. Keinath. the Pennsylvania quar-
ter and a basketball expert. tiung the
plgsxin as If IL were a baseball. Once he
made an actual throw Of forty-eight yards
for a net gain of thirty-five yards. 1t was
seldom that the Quakers failed TO recover
their forward pass .. and they were by no
means slow at blocking of Comedians
when the latter were trying to catch their
own forward pass 8.
Neither side had a good rushing attack.
nota.ng that compared in concerted action
or sustained power with Yale's, or for that
matter Princeton's. The Pe~nBsylvanians.
however. did not care anything about
COrnel's big red line. When they could
not get through it or past il they simply
threw the ball over IL and then were at the
-other end to get the ball again
In the back field and in a majority OF
positions in the line Pennsylvania played a
better game than Cornell. The backs ran
fa2tSr and we're off more quickly; the line
and the backs worked IN better harmony;
the forwards moved more in unison-in short
there was better team play on the Quaker
side. The Cornell men were more I'M
certain in their taokling. in the open any
way The ground was soft and they had
trouble in keeping their footing. The
Pennsylvania standard bearers we're 1.-THE.
alert. and on their toes-cOOl, epTingy and
confident.
LAY JUsr AN
There was rough play. but not purposely
80. Such hard bumps that befell particle
pants were those that came in the course
OF earnest endeavor and relentless purpose,
not with deliberate intent to do injury.
Right end was a hoodoo position for Cornell.
FIRST Van Orman was incapacitated and
taken out, then Tydeman was disabled.
making a tackle Of H~ollenback. Tydeman
tried to geJ up but could not stand; ne was
game as a pebble. however. and again tried
70 get up and limp to the scrimmage line. He
made no grandstand pay about II, not look
ing TO the side lines FOR sympathy or help,
but was bent solely on getting back into the
fr y. There he lay helpless until his com
panions assisted him OF the field.
H~ollenback. Draper, Ziegler, FolwelI,
Pauxtis and Keinath all played splendidly
Sor Pennsylvania. Hollenback was good
with his steady puntinR and long sweeping
runs; Draper ran with the ball well and never
was idle. both he and Ziegler smashing
through time and again and smearing Corr
Yyell formations, In he second half Draper
Ieade a siyty-five yard run for a OUCH
down after tearing through and n~ippingthe
bL.i on u tumble. Pauxtis covered Kicks
adJri-:biy and received the forward pass in
brilliant style: Folweu's defensive work
was superb, and Keinath caught kicks we'll
and was the handspring in the long forward
pass.
Ire emu Work OF DOtn sides IN Rettlng
down under punts was excellent and little
transpired in the way Of running kicks
back. What there was was lone mostly
by. Pennsylvania. Van Orman and the
other Cornell ends were capable Ia line
defence and covered kicks cleverly, but
their tackling lacked the surenees of the
Pennsylvania ~outfiankers.
McCalie played good football. vent
into his openings clean and hard. though
he never travelled very far. The Penn
~rylvania secondary defence was too watch
full for that. O'Rourke was a good. man
in tho line for Cornell. He was in all the
plays and covered a great deal OF ground,
yet with n suggt stiOn of aimlC ssness at
times such az occasionally manifested
itself in the Cornell play. He was always
aggressive. however. and generally effective.
PENNSYLVANIA RE~soURCEFUL.
As u finished product. as a game accom-
CeniCd by y driving offence, bafhingly di-
verse tactics backed up by slashing rushing.
the contest wa not up to the calibrs of the
Yale Princeton hattie. Vet Pennsylvania
was resou -ceful and handled the situation
with watch she had TO rope in mastery
fashion. Not only wrs II evident that the
Quakers entertained no thought Of defeat,
but tieir play nonphIase1 their rivals, who