The Montgomery advertiser., 1907-05-23
BIG GRIST OF CASES
CITY COURT TO RESUME HEAR
INGs JUNE ..



reconvene June 8. with dye. A. D.
Sayrt on the bench
The court will devote Its attention
to. hearing non-jury cases Until June
10. when jury csses will be consid-
cred.
Henry N. Hughes. Clerk ofsthe City
Court, made out the following list of
jury and non-jury cases yesterday. with
the dates set for the tri Of each
June 3--Ida Turner VS.. Med. Nor
gan as administrator of Sarah Ger
aid, deceased; J. e. sHunnicutt and
Company vs. Mrs. Sabei. Hattie l..
Stable, George w. Mue.lar and w. D.
Ell Jr., trustee In bankruptcy; Clear
Creek Lumber Company VS.. Robert
Nixon, two ceses; New Extra Coal
Company VS.. Janney and Company; F.
M. Dougless, doing business as Lu-
verne Oil Mills VS.. Atlantic Coast Line;
J. w. McNeili VS.. Farrin Korn Lum-
Der Com. oany; studebaker Brothers
Manufacturing Company VS.. Florida
Lumber Company; Bessie X. Massie
VS.. Mary c. OBrien; Union Bank and
Trust Company vs.. r. e. Creelman;
Union Bank and Trust Company VS..
+. E. creelman. defendant. and J. E.
Henderson, individually and men,
Der of the Tyson Lumber Company;
Alabama National Bank vs. E. r. Nc
David; Charles Cofeld VS.. Z. E. Forbes
Piano Company; Central of Georgia
R--iiroad Company VS.. r. H. Bozeman;
w. A Brown VS.. Lewis evils; Willie
Patterson VS.. Grand Lodge of Knights
of Pythias. a corporation; j. w. Black
VS.. Penn Mutual Life Insurance Com
pany o. Philadelphia: The Bonded
Warehouse Company VS.. s. B. Smith;
r. J. Scott and Sons VS.. Western I'm
ion Telegraph Company; Durham-Guy-
on Company VS.. GreiI Brothers Com
pany: Charles w. st ohbeck VS.. No
BILE Gcode- Taylor Shoe Company; w.
Ia. Moore VS.. John C. o'Connell, de-
PENDANT, Lucy A. oconnell, guardian;
w. II. Moore VS.. John Z, o'conell. de-
PENDANT, Excelsior Brick Company,
j. Afford Annie Alexander VS.. Rod
ley. alias Rhoderick Lewis.
June Hicks Bros. VS.. Sellers and
Drum, l.. Lasseter and Company VS..
+. w. Crowder, Western Loan Com
pany VS.. Charlie Williams, Fourth
National Bank VS.. Florence Rice, late
~ doing business as the Rice Dry
Bank We. Florence Rice. defendant.
George Stuart, trustee and garnishee;
H. b. Clafiin Company VS.. Florence
Rice. the Western Railway VS.. Rach-
ael Smiley, Raphael cohn VS.. Florence
Rice and Gus Rice, j NJ. Carr VS.. r.
j. Edwards. defendant, r. M. McDon-
ough. garnishee; J. H. o'Gwyn VS.. ].
l.. Stephens.
June s--The Exchange National
Bank VS.. j. l.. Stephens, Montgom-
cry Traction Company VS.. M Sabel
and Son, Planters Cotton Oil Company
vs.. ]. 3. Mitchell. Mrs. ". A. r.
thompson VS.. n. Mersivitz. John Doe,
ex-dem; Bessie w. Walker VS.. T. w. |
Oliver and r. w. MADISON, shafuse |
n EIol Ewfn
tionary Company, Hails-Noble Print |
ing and Stationary Company VS.. Con- |
solidated Drag Line. Martin and Wall |
vs.. M. d. Young and M. c. Young, |
w. o. Scogin VS.. T. J. Gray.
June CIV. A. Grassland VS. Pull
man Company. J. r. oglesby VS. At
lanta and West Point Railroad Com
pany: W. M. Hudson VS.. ]. B. Hol-
combe, Emma Holcombe and George
Hoicombe; A. s. Knowles Dry Goods
company va. Adams Express Company,
defendant, Southern Express company;
garnishee; Southern School Book De-
pository VS.. George w. Halls, Jr.; E. &.
Mattel VS.. ]. NJ. Farriss; L. q. Irby VS..
J. H. Conklin and William Fitssim-
mons; l. z. Irby VS.. J. Fl. Conklin, ct
al. defendants. w. M. Couric, gar
nishee;.H. NJ Austin and Company. VS..
Lyle Aycock and Thomas Cook; H M.
Austin and Company VS.. Aycock and
Cook, defendants. L. A. Sanderson, gar
nishee; w. II. Moore VS.. S. A. Billing:
Albright-Prior Company VS. w. B. Sto-
vail; ]. w. Moore VS.. John B. Beers;
Vesuvius Lumber Company VS.. Whey
Williams and Umphrey Williams;
spoon Motlow VS.. l. II. Lee; L. p. West
VS.. Montgomery Liquor Company, and
Jules stern; The Fleischmann compa-
NY VS.. Montgomery Liquor Company,
and Jules Stern; T. w. Harmon VS. Sam
Wright, defendant, Montgomery Trac-
ton Company. garnishee; Alabama
Chemical Company VS.. Western Union
Telegraph Company.
June Western Loan Company VS.. J.
g. Green; M. A. Westcott, ct al. vs.T.
]. Maddox.
The following are the Jury cases:
June 10--H. D. C. Roy VS. Mont
gomery Land and Improvement Com
pany, Allen Linton VS.. Seth Johnson, |
Jane e. Miller VS.. F. M. Moseley, |
Annie Titles VS.. A. G.. Rhodes and |
Sons Company. Southern Cotton Oil |
Company VS.. J. D. Hendrix, Mary |
pany, Mollie A. w Riley VS.. Securi- |
ty Mutual Life Insurance Company,
Sam Wright VS.. Montgomery Trac- |
tion Company, C. V. Chapman VS.. |
Montgomery Traction Company, VIII |
w. Hill VS.. Western Union Telegraph |
Company.
June lin. C. Stokes VS.. Albert
F. Wilson and ]. w. Dimmick, A. r. |
Dennis VS.. Montgomery Traction Com |
pany. w. A. Harris VS.. N. j. and M |
l.. Griel, Annie Henderson VS.. Henry |
w. Clark, A. T. Newell VS.. Atlantic |
Coast Line, Hayes Purcell VS. Mont |
gomery Traction Company. w. b. |
Jackson VS.. Mobile ana Ohio Railroad |
Company.
June 12-Mrs. CryseI VS.. Western
Railway of Alabama, Knight Yancey /
and. Company VS.. A. N. Catrevas, the |
Troy Buggy Works Company VS.. W. |
H. Bowdoin. ct al, two cases; Lula
Hopper VS.. E. E. Forbes and Z. z. |
Forbes Piano Company, Matilda A. !
Knabe VS.. Montgomery Traction Com
pany, Western National Bank of Lou
isville. KY. VS.. r. H. Vaughan and |
W. II. Vaughan.
June 13-Annie West VS.. seaboard |
Air Line Railway, w. NJ. Johnson VS.. |
Western Railway. Dothan Muie Com /
pany VS.. Central of Georgia. Dothan |
Mule Company VS.. Louisville and |
Nashville Railroad Company, w. F.. |
Vandiver and Company VS.. Black and |
Company and City Council of Mont |
Georgia, Sol Hutchinson VS.. Mont |
gomery Traction Company. Lorenzo |
Davis VS.. Atlantic Coast Line Rail- |
road.
June i'll. D. Compton VS.. J. w.
Chastain, r. D. Park VS.. Montgom-
cry Traction Company, Lon HartweIl |
VS.. Montgomery Traction Company, |
Sarah j. Cobb VS.. Montgomery Trac- |
ton Company, Charles w. Strother VS.. |
Charles Graves VS.. Montgomery Trac- |
(npopapv Tahn Uipdhara