Weekly Arizona journal-miner., 1907-04-03
LITTLE BROTHER RECEIVER SUIT
 DISMISSED.
(From Fridays Daiiy.)

When the ease of Carl Theis vs. Dr. J. Waterloo Dinsdalc, ct al, was called in the district court, at 10 clock, yes. terday morning, Attorney General F.. 5. Clark, representing the plaintiff and tho Little Brother Mining company, moved tha, the suit be dismissed, which was granted. On his motion the suit of the Little Brother Mining company against F. D. Barr, ct al, was also dis missed
 In justification of his motion. At torney General Clark, addressing the court, stated. in part, that since the suit was instituted the stockholders of the Little Brother company had held the regular annual meeting of the com. rcctors, and tha, it was the desire of tho new directorate 10 have the shit dismissed. He also added that r. D. Barr had made n settlement in full with the new management, thus ending all legal differences between his clients and Barr.
 He also explained to the court that the regular annual meeting of the stockholders was held on March 1G, the date upon which it should be held in accordance with the provision of the articles of incorporation of the com pany, and that the meeting adjourned until March IS, the day set for the annual meeting in the bylaws, and that at this latter date all action taken at the first meeting was ratified, thus relieving the actions of the stockbold- CTS from any criticism. Mir. Clark ad. dcd that there was about iJO,000 shares of the outstanding issue of nearly 65O,. 900 shares of the company represented at the meetings
 Judge Hall of Texas, also a stockhold. CT in the company, and representing other stockholders associated with him, objected to tho dismissal of the suits. He urged the court 10 withhold his de. cision until meeting of the treasury stockholders was held this (Thursday) evening, at O clock, at No. l22 Fleury street. He said that a call had been issued to all the treasury stockholders of the company to meet and elect board of directors.
 Attorney Hall was asked by the court if it was the intention to allow none but treasury stockholders to vote at the called meeting, and on being answered in the affirmative, the cour; suggested that the other stockholders in the company could not he prohib. ited from voting at any meeting of the stockholders.
 Hall continued, however, to argue against dismissal of the suits, until finally informed by Judge Sloan that the court was not acting as guardian extraordinary for all mining companies in the county that were in trouble with stockholders. At this juneture in the proceedings, Attorney James Loy, counsel for J. Waterloo Dinsdale, inter. posed, ana asked if the dismissal of the suits would be without prejudice to his clients, and was answered by the court in the affirmative, that such was the case as a matter of law.
 woodburn Gets Judgment.
 Judgment by default for the sum of s6ij was entered in favor of the plain tin in the ease of William woodburn vs. the Cumberland Mining company
 Mrs. Earle Gets Divorce.
 A divorce was granted to Mrs. Louise Earle from John W. /. Earle. The ease of B. D. Harrington vs. Scott Williams, and II. J. Crane vs. Minnie Crane, were set for hearing today. The divorce ease of Farrow vs Farrow was set for trial Saturday.