Daily Arizona silver belt., 1907-05-07

 anxious only to see that exact justice is done these men; that they are given their full legal rights and not con. demned unless proved guilty of this specific act, they are entitled to the cordial cooperation of all just and fair minded citizens.
 'So far as by any action, or by murderous and reasonable language such as that quoted above from Debs (and others) they tend to bring pres sure to bear upon the state authorities and the courts, to obstruct the course of justice, and to render it difficult to convict the men if guilty, they are equally without stint to be condemned, and anything that the federal authori ties can do, in either event, to further the cause of justice is to be done.
 In response to your question, it is, trust, needless for me to say that if at any time you or anyone else can submit to me any evidence showing that there has been miscarriage of justice for or against Messrs. Mover or Hay wood, which you believe it is my power to remedy, l will at once bring such evidence to the attention of the attor- ney general to have him give it the fullest consideration and to take there on any such action, if any, as it may be in the power of the federal author ities to take.
 ''Sineerely yours,
 THEODORE ROOSEVELT. !"
 In the discussion that followed mo ton to accept the report a delegate charged that the president had evaded the issue. This called forth a response from Delegate Coakley. The latter said that the committee considered the in- terview satisfactory and "that it was not up to the president to prove that there had been miscarriage of justice, but to those defending Mover and Hay wood.
 After several delegates had been heard it was decided to forward copy of the letter to counsel for the indicted Idaho labor leaders and let them submit to President Roosevelt any evidence they might have that there had been a miscarriage of justice in the extradition of Mover and Haywood and Pettibone from Colorado.
 In the course of his remarks, Mir. Coakley said:
 ''If we ask man to give us square deal, let us give him a square deal, too. This letter is not an evasion. It is right to the point and shows that the president more than twelve months ago intended to sec that Mover and Hay wood got square deal, no matter what he thought about them personally.
 "Some of the delegates to this body thought it was the duty of the com. mittee to attack the president. Con- sequently, they still believe we did not do our full duty. There are men here who are not sincere in their sympathy for Mover and Haywood. They are simply trying to use this case to adver- tise their propaganda. It is high time that organized labor began to find out where it belongs. It has been pulled along by the. nose by socialists long enough.
 "The president is entitled to our re- spect. He has done his duty, He wants to give us and Mover and Haywood square deal and we ought at least to do as much for him. If proof can be fur nished that Mover and Haywood are victims of miscarriage of justice, then we must insist that the president carry put the promise made in that letter, and [ am certain he will.n
 Only one other delegate attacked the president and he was answered by Sam iel Debs of the Newspaper Delivery inion, and a member of the Actors Protective association, and several del gates who are known as opponents of Mr. Roosevelt's political policies. . Rudolph Modest, delegate from a 'oeialist union of cigarmakers, declared he president s attitude was so clear hat the question whther there had been l miscarriage of justice. in the extradi- ion of Mover and Haywood was no onger one for discussion by the labor bodies. It was for the lawyers of the accused men to prove to the president hat there had been an illegal extradi- ion, and if they could do that it would hen be incumbent upon the president o fulfill his promise and see that they eceived justice.