New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1907-02-14

which put to you YESTERDAY, at what time n,n in
SO which YOU have referred to in your testimony
Mr. jerome am s)rrv 70 object again, but that
Is the way. this jurisdiction. that the Court
be put and stall have to object 70 IT, me court
would not allow me to put question I'm that FORM.
facts upon which the witness must make his an
swer and cannot be made by reIerphs 10 tslT se
theticaI question counsel has got TO eTnoody H. &c
| put -'T'''''' " WI S'''' - wv
A long discussion followed, in which court
ana the two counsel took part. Mr., Delmas
t-ied to reframe his questions to meet Mr. Je-
roIne's objections. but did not succeed At last
The latter said that as nc understood 1t DR..
Evans had used the various expressions 81
'.mantal explosion "sEip at sea without rud-
der" mental illumination" etc, all with rel
I erence to the events of the night OF June -
1906. IF that Is so, then am entirely satished
! to have it so stand" said NJ. Delmas
After Dr. Evans had testified as to the relation
of epilepsy to insanity he was excused and Dr.
John r Deemar was recalled and examined
Or. Deemar. when you were upon the stand nd
The other day YOU Were asSed WYNN WIN r. LiTd,
state who this first cousin was? A-John Washing
0IWi you state at what time you observed this
first cousin Of the defendant? Al observed him
QEAre you able to state the mental condition Of
Q'LWiIl YOU state what the mental condition
Of this is?
DR. Deemar was not allowed to reply, and
long conference Of counsel and court took place
/ after which Nr. jerome saId:
+ please honor the o s2tG4 %hif rt h3 is
arisen nero mas orouEht 10 Nv" I'M LII and codici
as to which there IS difference Of opinion nct"tT,
b% % anI means Clear ,ha the attitude
i[i or ,alrn3iesibilifv Of his document, al
though ii is my present impression that It IS 6u
position that have taken in regard 10 1t Is cor, cor
rect. n is most desirable tnst sho,ild ID" ,
hered with certain matters thar ale mPeriiln 2e
Td, amd tie POSITION Of Defendants counsel ia
rect. If they insist 10 is their dulE no uo"''
TO do so, it will have to go on record
MOVE TO SAVE TIME,
The paper itself IS already marked for identified,
ton ~ The courtesy Of counsel it was submitted
% but only this afternoon lust 2sfoPf [ne Il
q have it typ"written II Is that very [olnm ~
| tho contents Of it may consent to vithdraw my
objection or may have 70 opoSe ,sG 5 any S I az
animation OF it both by your honor and by counsel
a a2 ' ao Tf%p the dscusso we q adsb
not, considerable time would he wasted IN Te''''S
( The second point is this that tho family physL-
VINO was on ne slahq. l., 'rgH , oovr p.bether tho
2E Win t5e go5 e sre nG shoGd " he opposed or
sdge Of What their testimony may he OF course
nraI objections under the strict rules or law, "I'h
might cause delay But / have reason 20 oetGet'
! that these two gentlemen are gentlemen or 'laf
acter and counsel have consented that talk WIN
! them i'm my office. and II should see that me
facts they relate are such as We may o"T 1 Ia
! 10 60 I'm might consent on the other nahI
| not knowing what their testimony woNfd ne or
course must. in the discharge of my duty oppose
/ the admission Of something which I'm the END 'lkl
tr~0 ont 10 he rerfeCtiv proper. and Vn'u miEIt
! only take time without serving any useiul pN'-
/ pose =; 80,
So that I'm view Of that situation. counsel for tn
defence and for the people ~ the opinion that
! time win be saved by an adjournment
! Counsel FOR the defence agreed and adjourn
ment was ordered until this morning
! Following adjournment NJ. Jerome. the two
| phvsiciaus and counsel for the defence had =
| conference and an auICatle agreement was
/ reached II was agreed 10 hav" the PHYSICIANS
/ give their testimony Tho first thing today. The
/ yyU ~ Thaw il is understood, will then he
! introduced # being said that NJ. Jerome had
/ waived objections. Following, Mrs. Evelyn ThaT
! will probably continue her testimony