The Olneyville times. (Olneyville [Providence, R.I.]) 1887-1917, 1907-11-08

ronsge Will Be Large.
In theory public utilities operated by
German cities must pay their own
way. This theory Is not, however,
| fully borne out in practice. because the
allowance for depreciation Is frequent
ly inadequate, and the plants are not
required to make good the taxes for
merly paid by the companies they su-
perseded. But the effort 20 put these
services on a paying basis has resulted
I'm limiting the various undertakings TO
districts where they are sure to pay.
On the other hand, when these utilities
are operated by companies the same
restrictive results are noticed, because
almost without exception the fran
chises are so weighted down with pro-
visions for payments 10 the city and
are at the same time Of such short
duration that the companies would not
be warranted in extending the service
beyond the districts In which they are
sure 10 pay at once.
Professor Hugo X. Meyer I'm recent
articles In the Electrical Railway Re
view and the Journal Of Political Econ
omy describes the results Of this re
strictiye policy on street railways and
electric lighting, and the following
facts are taken from his articles:
The cities that went into the street
railway business adopted n uniform
fare OF % cents, but with two excep-
tlons abandoned this after short trials.
The experience Of two typical German
cities will prove Of interest as showing
what high rates are charged when
cities attempt TO operate utilities on a
paying basis.
When the city Of Cologne took over
the street railways the fares charged
were % cents for distances up TO l.5
miles and 3.75 cents for the maximum
distance 60 miles. After operating
them awhile the city authorities raised
the fare materially while extending
slightly the minimum stage. The pres
ent charges are % cents for 10 miles,
3.75 cents for $40 miles, cents for
563 miles and COS cents for distances
over 5G3 miles
The city OF Dusseldorf, which ac-
quired It's street railways in 1900, at
tempted 20 operate them at the uni
form fare of % cents, which had been
charged by the street railway com
pany, but soon found that II was losing
money and limited the % cent fare to
2.4i miles. charging $40 cents for dis
l.t 4
After increasing the track nHsage the
city again raised the fare considerably,
reducing the minimum stage. The
prices now charged are % cents Tor
lb6 miles. 3.75 cents for $40 miles, 3
cents for miles, 6.25 cents for 4.75
miles. rs cents for 6.3S miles, $40
cents for T.10 miles and 10 cents for
794 miles.
II should be borne I'm mind that these
prices are really very much higher
than corresponding rates would be In
this country. because wages In Ger
many are much lower than I'm the Unit
ed States. The eXorbltance OF these
charges is shown by the fact that In
Minneapolis, city of the same size
as Dusseldorf, n passenger can ride
thirteen miles for 3 cents, while In
Buffalo. which has population about
equal to that Of Cologne, the passen-
ger gets fourteen miles for a nickel
The desire OF the cities to make all
possible profits out Of franchises and
To limit them 10 short terms has re-
suited in greatly delaying the develop
ment OF public electric lighting al
though the people were anxious To
have the new lights installed. This Is
shown by the fact that In lS9l-oh
there were I'm operation I'm factories,
stores. etc. more than 4.IT6 private
electric light plants, although two
years later there were only little
more than 800 central electric lighting
stations I'm the whole Of Germany. As
the private or isolated plant, ms II Is
called I'm this country, Is far less eco
nomical than the central station, this
restrictive action Of the German cities
has thrown great burden Of cost on
its progressive citizens. The situation
is the more remarkable because at the
lllllt Ol tue VI 'ltN AAANAAN
for lighting and traction purposes Ger
many was far better equipped TO per
feet and develop these systems than
was the United States, yet II has been
completely outstripped 10y our own
country, chiefly II not solely because
here private enterprise has been given
a comparatively free hand.
In closing one OF his articles Pro-
| fessor Meyer says:
THE unwillugncss Of the cities 20
suffer financial losses on behalf OF the
congcsted city populations after those
cities had denied those congested pop
ulations relief at the hands of profit
seeking companies Is I'm instructive
contrast TO the eloqucnce with which
the advocates of purchase by the cities
had denounced the dividend seeking
companies"
Purchased Current More Economical.
An electric light plant was installed