The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-10-30
RECORD OF THE COURTS

 l yesterday morning in all the courts. Jury cases were on trial in all the civil courts and the first division of the criminal court.
 Circuit Court. In Judge Colemans division of the circuit court a judgment by consent for s4OO was rendered for the plaintiff in the case of E. A. Bennett vs. Brming- ham Railway, Light and Power company The case of J. (. Vanderford vs. Zack Cross Is on trial and will probably con ! clude early today.
 The following docket is set in Judge Coleman's division of the circuit court ! today:
 J. A. Davidson vs. Birmingham Rail | way. Light and Power company, dam | agesi James Noble, ct al, vs. the Tab ernaole Baptist church, ejectment; T. NJ. l Gilmore vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company damages; Tanner Bros vs Mrs M. T. Royster assumpsti Moore & Handley Hardware Co vs. E M. Wheeler garnshment In Judge Lane's division of the circuit court yesterday the case of Oliver E. Schwartz vs Birmingham Railway and | Locomotive company was concluded and resulted in verdict for the defendant The plaintiff claimed damages for loss of services of his son, George Schwartz,
  1 one of his eyes by splinter of steel from a drill which he was working in defendants machine shops. The case of W. A. Davis vs. Western Union Telegraph company was concluded and went to the jury at 5:3O o'clock. The following docket is set in Judge Lanes division of the circuit court to- day:
 Isaac Stinson vs. Republic Iron and Steel company, damages; Minerva l.. Jol- ly administratrix, Vs Louisville and Nashville Railroad company. damages; Frank Higgins vs. Western Union Tele- graph company, damages; D. Lusco vs. Birmingham Terminal company. dam ages; John c. Dorn vs. J. C. Mayfield company, assumpsit.
 City Court.
 Tn the first division of the city court yesterday the case of L. B. Matheney vs. T. A Jones was tried and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for $4S.5o The case of the Halle Randolph Man ufacturing company vs. c. Gunter, ct als is on trial and will be resumed this morning.
 The following docket Is set in the first division of the city court today:
 J. W. Donnelly vs. F.. w. Howze, ct al. appeal of defendant; R. H. Jones ys. Jefferson Amusement company, damages; Mrs. M. C. Baldwin vs. Western Union
  Kemps vs. II. c. Meade, assumpsit; Jo- seph Tohio vs. Robert L. Leatherwood, damages Art Wall Paper company, ct all vs. R. D. Burnett company, ct al, assumpsit; American Jobbing association, ct als., vs. D. B. Bird, assumpsit.
 In the second division of the city court yesterday judgment for $6 was rendered for the plaintiff in the case of Samuel r, Spencer vs. Alabama Great Southern raii- read company.
 The case of Elizabeth Keihle vs. Bir mnhain Railway, Light and Power com- pany was on trial all day and had not concluded when court adjourned.
 The following docket is set for trial in the second division of the city court to- day:
 Mrs. A. M. Stewart vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, dam- ages; Clarence Carr vs. Central Con3truc- ton company damages; Rena Summer vile vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company. damages; James w. Greer vs. Cahaba Southern Mining com pany damages: Will Willmore vs. Bir- mingham Railway, Light and Power con- pany, damages; Mack T. Stagg vs. Bir- minghaIn Railway, Light and Power con- pany damages.
 In the third division of the city court yesterday the case of Nathan Goodman vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company was settled after going to trial, for $500 judgment for the plaintiff.
 The case of Charley Collier vs. Ten nessee Coal. Iron and Railroad company is on trial.
 The following docket is set in the third division of the city court today:
 T. H. Robinson vs. Birmingham Rail- way, Light and Power company, dam- ages; Henry Jackson vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, dam- ages; John Yates vs. Western Union Teie- graph company, damages; Norah Phillips, admnistratrx, vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company, damages; Martha Clark vs. Rates Transfer and Warehouse company, damages; J. M. Lathem vs. Oliver Chalifoux, damages.
 Suits Filed.
 In the city court yesterday Marie Pierce filed suit against J. T. Burton and others for s900 damages for alleged breach of the condition of a bond.
 James R. Adams claims $10,000 damages from the Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company for personal injuries al legged to have been received while alighl- ing from q car.
 Walter IIarrell, pro ami, vs. Birmng- ham Railway, Light and Power com pany. Plaintiff claims 5000 for alleged personal injuries.
 In the circuit court Frank Sharp illed suit against the Sloss- Sheffield Steel and Iron company for $l0000 for personel in juries alleged to have been inflicted by locomotive running over plaintiffs foot. Jake Foilack, pro am1.. vs Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company. Plaintiff claims $500 for injuries to per son and to a wagon alleged to have been struck by a street car at an in- tersection of streets.
 Criminal Court.
 Considerable interest has been attached to a case heard in the second division of the criminal court yesterday before Judge Dan A. Greene. George l.. Thomas, n.a ilv dressnd white man. charged with