The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-11-19
RECORD OF THE COURTS

 Business was of the usual routine na- ture in the courts yesterday. Juries were quickly organized and several eases were dismissed for want of prosecution. In the case of D. O. Davis vs. The Grassell Chemical company a verdict was returned for the plaintiff for $25Oo. Judge Coleman was reported to be considerably improved but not yet 'suf- ficiently recovered to be able to pre- side in court.
 Circuit Court
 lie case of George Moss vs. St. Louis court yesterday the case of Charles Brewer vs Birmingham Railway. Light and Power company was tried and re- suited in verdict for the defendant. The case of George Moss vsh St. Louis and San Francisco railroad company is on trial. The olaintiff claims damages for alleged failure to deliver certain per sonal property.
 The following docket is set in Judge Lanes division of the circuit court to- day.
 J. J. Ferry, administrator, vs. Birming- ham Railway Light and Power company, damages; A. J. Thomas vs. Alabama Great Southern railroad company, dam ages Morris Loveman, administrator, vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; Smith, Kline & Co.,, ys Mims B. Stone, appeal by defend- ant; J. G. Sears vs. w. B. Garfield, ap- peal by defendant
 In thc division of the. eircYit court presided over by Judge Miller the fol lownig cases were dismissed for want O. prosecution:
 " II. and J. IT. Woodwar, executors vs. Robert Stevens; Allen Mims vs. Will jam B. Moore; M. C. Riser company vs II l. Screws; John Burrell vs. Sloss Sheffield Steel and Iron company; H. Gasaue vs NJ. w. Parsons ct al; T. S. tKnowles vs. Sloss- Sheffield Steel and Iror company.
 The case of Emanuel Lomand Vs the Southern Railway company was con- cIuded and went to the jury at 5:3O.
 The following docket is set in the cir cult court before Judge Miller today; Citizens Savings bank, administrator vs J. l.. Perry, damages; A. Rory X Sons vs. Harris Goldberg, assumpist The Battleshp Manufacturing company vs. Harris Goldberg, assumpsit; Mat tie yickers vs St. Louis, and San Fran cisco railroad company, damages; Eliza Moore vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Rali road company, damages.
 City Court.
 In the first division of the city cour' yesterday the following cases were dis missed for want of prosecution:
 B. P. Ivey vs. Louisville and Nash vile railroad company ct als.; w. Il Wajles vs. Southern Mutual Aid associa tion: ". II. Wales vs. Southern Rail way company; Ivy W. Gregory Ys. Ser F. Riper: J. T. Carlin vs. Robert Baker In the case of c. II. Nabb vs. Frances NJ Rutherford, judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for sS2.2o.
 The following docket is set in the mrs division of the city court today:
 w H. Priegel vs. Highland Marke company, appeal by defendant; w. uansburger vs. H. B. Abernatny, man damus. Jaffe Jewelry company vs. Ro5er |, Crook, Jr., detinue; John NJ. Duoose vs. Republic Iron and Steel company, ap neal by defendant; T. H. Spencer vs. Al lison & Co. ct al., attachment; Nrs. E uouser ct al. vs. Thomas McIlheron Min ing company ct al; Mrs. F. Houser ct al vs Pratt Coal company, damages; Mrs E Hauser ct al. vs. Pratt Consolidated Coal company, damages J. w. Ferguson vs. Fannie Towser, Certiorari by detend