The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-10-23
RECORD OF THE COURTS

hGOOhO OI HE OOO1e V Business in all divisions of the city court was disposed of by noon yesterday In the circuit court two juries were out when court adjourned.
 The quo warranto proceedings in the case of John L. Parker vs. the Mayor and Aldermen of Birmingham, which were set in Judge Coleman's division of the circuit court, were passed until 2 o'clock today.
 In Judge Lanes division of the circuit court yesterday afternoon motion to set aside the judgment previously rem dered in the police commission case was argued by Attorneys Felix Blackburn and John B. Weakey Judge Lane took the case under advisement.
 Circuit Court.
 In Judge Coleman's division of the cir cult court yesterday the case of c. C. Bates vs. Lee Carmichael was concluded and went to the jury.
 H. s. Meade and company vs Birming- ham Paint and Roofing company, appeal by defendant: J. and G. Lippman vs C. F. Bell and company, assumpsit; M J. Lewis vs. Dimmick Pipe company. dam ages; Mrs. A. S. Lawson vs Heaton and Goodwin. ct al., damages; Seals Piano and Organ company vs. J. M. Mullins, de- tinue.
 In Judge Lanes division of the circuit court yesterday the case of Mrs N. G. Brake vs. stowers Furniture company, was concluded and went to the jury.
 The following docket is set in Judge Lane's division today
 E. w. Jones vs. Birmingham Railway Light and Power company, damages; A. S. Cowan ct al. vs. United States Fi- dety and Guaranty company, assumpsit; Jesse Beam vs. NJ. O. Briant, ejectment; Collins and company vs. W. J, Frances, assumpsit Alvent Prinkelton vs. A. F. and A. M (col) damages. City Court. In the first division of the city court cept the case of Norman Webb, ct al. vs Will McFarlin & Co.,. ct al, which was passed to Thursday The following docket is set in the first division of the city court today
 Norman Webb, ct al vs. William M. McFarlin X O., damages; White X Howze vs. Garnett Smelting and Develop ing company. assumpsit; William McF'ar lin & Co. ct al., vs. Norman Webb, ct als, damages; Mayor and Aldermen of Birmingham vs. Anderson Hunter ct als., T. B. Lyon vs. Sam H. Harton, ct al, attachment; Moody & Hay vs. Frank s. White, damages; Mary Martin vs. South ern Railway company. appeal of defend- ant J. T. Palmer vs. J. B. Bloodworth, garnishment on judgment; R. M Carey vs. Louis K. Moss, assumpsit; Peoples Savings Bank and Trust company vs. Mack Rogers, ct als., assumpsit c. A. Ban vs. Mrs. Laura s. Palmer, ct als. assumpsit: George Smith vs. George Hays. attachment; E. R. Collins vs. M. K. Col iins, garnishment; James Smith vs. Mayor and City Council of Ensley, damages; Merchants Insurance and Loan company, vs. Walter Brown, certiorari; D. H. Rid de vs McLester and Van Hoose company assumpsit.
 In the second division of the city court yesterday the following cases were dismissed:
 James Dix vs. Republic Iron and Steel company; Frank sharp vs. Bir- mingham Railway. Light and Power company; Jack Walstrom vs. Pratt Consolidated Coal company; Matte Britton vs. Southern Railway company; Arthur l.. Bell, pro ami, vs. Southern Railway company.
 The case of K. B. Saunders vs. West ta ern Union Telegraph company was passed to todas
 The following docket is set in the second division of the city court to- day:
 Uclid Cox vs Birmingham Railway. Light and Power company. damages; J. l.. Brasfield vs. Sloss- Sheffield Steel and Iron company, damages; William Phillips vs. Means Fulton Iron com pany. damages; William Phillips vs. Birmingham Engineering and Construc- tion company ct al; Mrs M. E. How land vs. Louisville and Nashville Rail- road company. damages: l.. H. Warner