The St. Lucie County tribune. (Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County, Fla.) 1905-1920, 1907-12-27
,DN1ROvE:RSY
'ISCONTENUf:O
.,,,oodent Ne,biIt Answers
Mr. Andrews' letter
. FIGHT 10 TIKI FINISH
- p,,ron> TO stand hN ,hc Nd.
,,,ioo ar u feast pro'0Si
in ,he R,ght Nlanner


| .. .rorwNE.
1II,, ndgr Andrews / h'u"ie th'
.. ',, Nh. pro-. .n the people p
.'.' yborr ,Ar, ca best express
D aora and .,uuU IN matters u'
! ~ irn5rtaprc. rr.,HinN prti'r
%a,dr and opruarsS t. MS plal 81
20" ""Nclnp ,ndiylldaO. N',h Il prVNon
'"wnlish nj, uru rods, pINNuE
! N, r,ciut'ra, and ,'.,ic. of r.rl
4 .n} Them g. ,rrg' his pn pose.
l..,.or, h.,c mo- apology % pli"r
,r more appearing ~ your
| .roi ia orIer t. compete the story
| ,rg told in Mr. t.lr,Ws last le.'
| lil0,rr Is anything ne can ADD 20
An credit N tny matter after ! am
j. | wiI, be- glad 10 rear. H. |
,rr,ir.y SAID or done Nothi'E ~
matter which vii not bear tire ut'
| , olbUriS. NJ Andr1Ws accuses
| .fMylns trrat.l h." iiNcuurt&ous-
.d ina Way Hn mad never been
.ad before, hll N ms part'diiE
ttglp does not give The cause. Let
ewt.tit WAS and the puDlic can
r., ybaI tNry would have done IA
ne circumstances, Bccaus" | dit
a At once acccdc ~ his demand Tor q
,eson t. the former noon period, he
M gay angr} a. on M cndeavor To
um the matter vita him and IN?
ul.,,i0n hat his tHlldrcn could bring
ilnh. he stated that hc Nould not
hr Ms children fJl Is minutes IN
rYctN with TIE other NO0n h"0r child
m stating that ,hrv wDulu hear i'm.
np,g language and he exposed t"
a5o,er Urgcticc during that time,
dA he would not tolerate and fin
N Il his remarks hy asserting that he
n ,rea immoral practices among the
.lrn from the court room Vindov 5,
With my own eyes" and that he
g,oo grounds, the SPACE under me
c0O and in the buahc. on the river
alk were all bad and afforded OppOr.
i1es IN this way winch he would not
ave his children rXpuarA t.. This
tde Of assertion and VIVA, | anew -
/, unRaranted abuse Of our teachers
sd Children, vas, | viii admit too
rth for M AMI | have no apology to
nike 10 NJ. Andrews for What | lnrn
ed 70 him. 1t was strenuous, I viii
11it, and may have been liscOurtrouS.
vii not take calmly frol any one an
warranted attack ON the characters
! olr school children amt ~ rhis ! am
ye have the SUPPORT and approval
\ the patrons. After assuring him
hat an Investigation of the Charge he
n made would be at once commenced
MpuShed to a finish. | left him, and
tent 70 my Office. Where ne followed
Ne within fifteen minutes and took
a's MS assertion that he had seen
tee Practices with mis- own eyes !"
@Iliying bis statement by stating
ial he had seen the oppurtunities for
l,a practice. which the teacher in
&rge could no, prevent.
Nov patrons ,,na s.gnels OF the pc
Ion what do You ,hink Of the gentle
tan whose fertile imagination has pjct-
I'd POUR children as addicted to these
Iac,Ices and who FOR that reason wiz
li allow his children 10 associate
tn them for even l5 minutes Tor
PROT contamination? DO yol blame
! for being Jiscuurtpous to him?
Nave te.t all along that NJ. An
Rvs man cement of this protest ha,
'en planned to put a distinct sliylt
on the s.hou, faculty. and myself and
remarks in his recent published let.
rseearly prove il, Nv request ina {
hrSt 90 to the Teachers with h,s
nplant was Il reasonable one and
Is IN the proper SEQUENCE or autl or.
u this matter or any sci 5nl trouble.
ill'ng there his reference would hry =
W. to the Supervisor of III. school
Il. Gladwn FAILING thor the
prrlntendcnt comes in ma an arliter
all disputes Any ,,her conrsa than
IS was irregular and Ii.cnurtaons tn
concerned and no one knows this
yer than Mr. Andrews