Bisbee daily review., 1907-06-01

written by Mrs. Myers. Buster came | back and swore to it, and took one 1 copy with him." continued Williams. |
 The witness denied ever having had | the conversation. sworn to by John l in which the testimony of the case was discussed, and said he only had a conversation with him re garding his fee. The defendant de nied most emphatically that either Campbell or Buster ever made state ment that Buster was not present or that he was not an eyewitness to the killing. He stated that the affidavit as prepared was substantially what Buster narrated to him. The wit ness denied that ever told John Camp bell that Coleman had a man who would swear to anything. He denied further that he had ever secured Bus ter to swear to anything in the Camp bell case. and said that Buster was willing witness. and told everything to him, as he dictated it to the girl.
 The witness stated that he did not get Coleman to get Buster to swear in the Campbell case; never got any body. The only conversation he had with Coleman in regard to the case was when Coleman came into his of flee to talk over Coleman's own case, which was pending in Tombstone. in which conversation Coleman stated that some of his witnesses were in Cananea, and that they might have to fix up an affidavit so as to get con tinuance. That Coleman then asked him how he was getting along with the Campbell case, and stated that he had a friend who saw the killing, who was going away, and that Williams might get his affidavit to secure a ! continuance in the Campbell case if he wanted it
 The witness was then turned over to the prosecution for cross-eXamina- Ltion.
 Williams was taken in hand by At I torney General Clark. He was first questioned regarding his fec in the | case. as to whether that wasn't m inducement to get out and rustic wit i nesses. He admitted that the fee oi s1.000 was not frequent ones. In re sponse to a question put by Attorney General Clark, asking him if he haC suggested anything to "TeX." Camp bell in the way of securing testimony he replied that he had not suggested anything. He also denied the state ment made by Tex Campbell that ht
 was afraid to send the Buster affidavit over in regard to the change of venue He admitted that he called up Ross Neale and told them that Buster want ed them to defend him, and told th'
 attorneys that Buster had s20.00. Vii Hams stated, that Buster sent for hin
 after his arrest and asked him to de fend him. and he told Buster he woulC not do it for SI,000, and that h. (Wiiliamsl afterwards got Ross tt
 defend Buster. Williams denied tha
 he ever offered to pay Ross any fe' for defending Buster
 The remainder of the examination
 was devoted to testing Williams rec
 olleetion of facts testified to in tht
 Campbell case, and the witness wal
 excused.
 Mrs. Milo Porter (nee Miss Delt;
 Myers), stenographer for s. K. Vii Hams at the time of the alleged subor
 nation of perjury, was the next wit ness.
 After a few preliminary questions she was asked 10 relate what occurred at the time of the making of the Bus ter affidavit She stated that Buster and Campbell came in together. Tke! went into the private office, and Mr 1 Williams asked Buster the question: and he answered them, and she tool the answers down practically just thu same as Buster gave them, except tht i wording: that Buster, in relating hi | testimony, stated he was present a the killing, only a short distance away
 The witness was subjected to |; General Clark, but nothing was devel l oped
 In regard to the case, J. c. Vertreei i was the next witness. He testified to having had a conversation five dty!
 after the Mclaughlin homicide at th' 0. K. Livery stable in Bisbee. 1T
 which conversation Buster stated tha he would have to go to Tombstone al
 witness in the Campbell case, al
 he was the main witness. He wa
 cross-examined mainly as to the char 1 acter of the witness. which show that the witness had been under ar
 rest on several occasions for differ ent offenses.
 The prosecution then stated to thu court that they ndQ some eNluSHce U
 introduce in rebuttal to show thu
 guilty knowledge or criminal inten of the defendant. This testimony |
 the same that had already been rulet
 out by the objection of the defense
 on the ground that it was not materia
 in the case, and was separate of fense. It was the testimony that V al
 offered by the prosecution by the wit
 ness John Campbell, relating to thu
 conversation the witness had helt
 with Williams regarding what on
 Frank Jones would testify to. Tn
 court stated that he would make . i ruling on the offer of this testiElon. at 9:30 a. m. Saturday, to which tim
 the court adjourned.
 The indications now are that al
 the testimony will be in by noon tc morrow, the arguments made durin
 the afternoon, and the case given [ the jury before dark.