The herald and news. [volume] (Newberry S.C.) 1903-1937, 1907-12-06

cc2Js and permitting them to impose
taxes in addition to those imposed by
the imperial government. Small inner
itances are exempt, but the tax is so
sharply progressive that when the in
heritance is still not very large. pro-
vided it is not an agricultural or for
est land, 1t Is taxed at the rate OF 70
per cent If 1t goes to distant relatives.
There is no reason why in the United
States the national government should
not impose Inheritance taxes IN add1-
ton to those imposed by the states,
and when we last had an inheritance
tax about one-half Of the states levied
such taxes concurrently with the ma
tional government, making combined
maximum rate in some cases as high
as 25 per cent.
To Tax NonresiGents Higher.
The tax should if possible be made
to bear more heavily upon those resid-
ing without the country than within 1t.
A heavy progressive tax upon very
large fortune is in no way such tax
upon thrift or industry as like tax
would be on a small fortune. No ad-
vantage comes either to the country
as a whole or to the individuals inher-
iting the money by permitting the
transmission in their entirety Of the
enormous fortunes which would be af-
fected by such tax, and as an Incl
dent to it's function Of revenue raising
such a tax would help to preserve
measurable equality Of opportunity for
the people Of the generations growing
to manhood.
We have not the slightest sympathy
with that socialisdc idea which would
try to put laziness, thriftlessness and
ineficiency on a par with industry.
thrift and efficiency, which would
strive to break up not merely private
property, but, what is far more 1mpor-
tant the home,: the chief prop upon
which our whole civilization stands.
Such a theory If ever adopted would
mean the ruin Of the entire country,
but proposals for legislation such as
this herein advocated are directly op-
posed to this class Of socialisdc the
cries.
Enforcement Of tho Law.
A few years ago there was loud COM
blaint that the law could not be In
voked against wealthy offenders. There
Is no such complaint now. The course
Of the department Of justice during the
last few years has been such as to
make it evident that no man stands
above the law, that no corporation Is
so wealthy that it cannot be hef to ac-
count. Everything that can be done
under the existing law and with the
existing state Of public opinion, which
so profoundly influences both the courts
and juries, has been done, but the laws
themselves need strengthening: They
should be made more definite, so that
no honest man can be led unwittingfy
to break them and so that the real
wrongdoer can be readily punished
Moreover, there must be the public
opinion back Of the laws or the laws
| themselves will be Of no avail. The
two great evils in the execution Of our
criminal laws today are sentimental1ty
and technicality. For the latter the
remedy must come from the hands of
the legislatures, the courts and the law
yers. The other must depend for its
cure upon the gradual growth Of
sound public opinion which shall insist
that regard for the law and the de-
mands Of reason shall control all other
influences and emotions in the jury
box. Both Of these evils must be re-
moved or public discomfort with the
criminal law will continue.
lnjunctions.
Instances of abuse in the granting
Of injunctions in labor disputes con-
tinue to occur, and the resentment IN
the minds Of those who feel that their
rights are being invaded and their lib
erty Of action and of speech .unWar-
rantably restrained continues likewise
to grow. Much of the attack on the
use Of the process Of Injunction is
wholly without warrant, but am con-
strained to express the belief that for
some Of it there is warrant. This ques-
ton is becoming one Of prime impor-
lance, and unless the courts will deal
with it in effective manner it IS GER
tain ultimately to demand some form
Of legislative action 1t would be most
unfortunate for our social welfare If
we should permit many honest and
law abiding citizens to feel that they
had just cause for regarding our courts
with hostility. I earnestly commend
to- the attention Of the congress this
matter, so that some way may be de-
vised which will limit the abuse Of In
functions and protect those rights
which from time to time it unwarrant-
ably invades. Moreover, discomfort Is
often expressed with the use Of the