Arizona republican., 1907-06-19
THE NEGRO
 MUST HANG
Supreme Court AffirmS
 Judgment Against Him
In the Case of Randolph Vs. Lindsay the Judgment Was Reversed.

William Baldwin the murderer of Mrs. Harvey Morris and her little daughter near Roosevelt will have tu hang. That was decided in the su- preme court yesterday afternoon when Chief Justice Kent rendered a decision affirming the judgment of the district court of Graham county where the case had been tried on a change of venue from Graham county.
 The chief justice said that there had been no appearance in the case and that no brief had been filed but the court had gone over the record and had found no material error. Baldwin had been sentenced to be hanged on May 6. All that remains now to be done is for the lower court to fix an- other day for the hanging.
 In the case of Epes Randolph ap- pellant against Lycurgus Lindsay ap- pellee from Pima county the lower court was reversed and the case was remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the findings of the supreme court. No formal opinion was handed down. the court having lacked the time for its preparation. But each side was furnished an indication of the grounds on which the case had been decided. The opinion will be filed later.
 This is part of the litigation which has originated in various parts of the country. It has been heard of in the courts of California and Texas and a suit was lately filed in the court at Duluth. Minn.
 In this case the defendant and ap- pellee had pleaded to the jurisdiction of the district court of Pima county and the plea had been sustained. One of the grounds set forth by the appellee was that service obtained upon the attorneys for the appellee was not proper service. Another was that in making answer to the suit the appellee had not been brought within the juris- diction of the court. IL was quite inn portant to the appellant that early and favorable action should be secured by the supreme court and Hon. F.. g. Ives relying upon a construction of the statutes of this territory relative to appearances obtained an order at the last previous of the court permitting him to be heard at this meeting. The case had then just been adversely de- cided against this client.
 For rapidity of progress through the courts of this territory this is a record breaker.
 The court held that that service up- on the attorneys for Lindsay was a proper service. It further held that in making answer to the suit begun in Pima county the appellant had been brought within the jurisdiction of that court. Associate Justice Nave in an opinion of some length dissented from the latter view.
 In the case of Maria Otero appellant against J. J. Otero and others appel lees from this county. an action orig mating in the probate court. a new trial was ordered. An order for a re- hearing was vacated in the case of Ismael T. de Amado appellant against B. Friedman appellee from Pima coun ty. In the case of Lawrence appellant against Cole appellee from Gila county motion to affirm on short transcript was granted. A motion for a rehear- ing was denied in the case of the Prescott National Bank appellant against A. J. Head appellee. At the previous meeting of the court the judg- ment of the lower court had been re- Yersed.
 In the case of John W. Lee appellant against the Salt River Valley Water Users Association the judgment of the court of Giia county was affirmed by