The times dispatch. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1903-1914, 1907-02-19
NMdzRAzSgzA@
MzMs 9 Z$,IzzzZzz2S,

4 L4E.AcdbID4pN w
I xEzNs 3 1dZS, ;1Zzzzzz2z
Were the decisions which you OBJ.
served during your first three visits tt
4 Thaw systematzed or not systematized?'
They were in u measure systcma.
TIED"
Were they systematized or not sys-
tematized?' repeated Mr.. Jerome
sharply.
"riley Were not altogether systcma-
tized."
in what respect were the dclusionE
not systenatized?"
The Form of Delusion.
l.. DR.. Evans began a long answer in
which he referred to the conversations
ne had with Thnw. Mr.. Jerome OBJ
tccted and stopped him. Mr. Delmas
at once insisted that he BIO allowed to
go on. Mr. Jerome refused to allow
MIN to continue, and by consent. the
entlre answer was stricken out, and
". Evans was asked the question
| again.
lie shifted from one delusive ;dea
| to another" .
Can you state one delusion that wo 9
NOT connected with what might hc
termed the parent delusion about stan
lord white and women?"
/ There was his delusion that renu.
taple lawyers and physicians were in
| asylum" '' Oh 10 an
Yes, but that was connected ,,,,.,,
4 nc 10. parent delusion," said Mr.. Jerome
would consider it as largely IN
uependent ! could see no reason WIZ.
NJ ne should connect me with any con,
Ispiracy against him" eoii-
Did he?"
No. but he was suspicious ., no
and every one" nv
sion?' tiia 'i%ed dcil-
It might be taken that way.o
what kind Of insanity is Indicated
oS systematized tdelusions?'' NsSo
paranoic insanity
DO the will and crd,c,, s,,o,,
tematized delusions?" % .
Yes
What delusion?'
delnsion which showed l,e Ia.
HeVed ne was the subject OF persecn.
non On; mat he was being hunted DOWN.
WAS thero parent delusion in the
VII VIII or codicil regarding Stanford
Looks Over the Will
/ ~. Evans picked up the will
wait, called out Mr.. Jerome! ~
onJest 10 your looking at those docu-
testified to them"
MI. Delmas said DR. Evans haa ,,o
rient 10 look over the papers. and was
Evans. az ~ ~.
Mr. Jerome eau
~, Then we withdraw our papers" said
Doctor. without re-reading these ma.
fers, can You state whether or not +hnre
parent delusion regarding Whtte?r
don say that there is but there
delusion both in the will and the
codici" 'u ''ic
,,. mat Is not an answer Mr.. Jerome
asked the question over and over again
Mf' Delinas objected to Mr. Jerome's
Nouiae' 90 not think he has the
,,sn. 70 continue this simply because
~ "ilhess does not answer as the dis
"!ee attorney wants him to-" he said.
lie has answered as l wanted"
why do you keep repeating 1t them,
asked Mr. Dclnas
Because ] don't want him 10 fall
into hole without seeing tfle hole
There was general laugh.
Parent Delusion.
Mr.. Jerome then asked again If the
VIII or codicil showed "a parent delus!on
i cant say that 1t IS a parent delu-
sion --''
20 you know what parent delusion
is?'
Yes"
"rhen do you find ii in this will or
codic?"
Il cannot subscribe to IT AZ a paren.
dcluslon there IL an apparent degu-
Bion--A well defined deluGion."
Cant you tell whether 1, IL a pa
rent delusIgn2" repeated Mr.. jerome.
y cant say whether IL IL or not"
WHY didn't YOU say 50 i'efore}
asked you the question half dozen
ItImesH
"And The wi,nesn replied half a
dozen times" interrupted Mr. De!inas.
when was the VIII cxecutedr
asked Mr.. jerome,
In 1896"
''iioW cid you aud ,hat out2'
u heard It referred 10 here ~ yoa
Land the pthGrg"
do you know when the codlcil wuL
Gxccutcd2"
II assume at about the same time
'TIie WI bears It's oF@n date rug
geatcd Mr., Dciuag
u hnow II daes, but ,i7ig Witness Eays
he assumes the date That eilgWs nov
| cArelessly he read IL
Mr Jerome asked the witnrFs ~
point our IN tho win single gnsysla,
matzcd deluBiDn.
pr Evans STATED - road
Don't DO That commanded If. ~.
rome,
To9 tod me 70" aaa " Evans
- did not
Is Allowed To Read.
JHstlc" bitBeraid rUied u,at ,llg va
Mlss had rjFhi 10 raad from d.
VIZ m fePly 10 me quatti0u
" Exams lnep read What IN esllee
Paragraph :. II prp2idod IN past
~ case ! ilo other Gtsr 8 natural
Nea'Il or u any suspicion atleiies ~
ny taxing or, or 4 | Should bq Hsda
@M%S WIN direct that my e4ec.D3.
slIail itnlundiaeiy ret a#ids ~ sun,
y Hlo'pN for on liberalization u ~
s ~ and for tha pi0s4eu
uoll OF ,ho guilty pagsopa
A. uua'Holial sums were needed in. ~
oeusolh were dilec.od W ish ,hGm