Pullman herald. [volume] (Pullman, W.T. [Wash.]) 1888-1989, 1907-04-20
New vi. E. Church.

liquor to minor: and
Whereas: said Geo. Carisch was
fined $500 by the police Judge who
was given jurisdiction in such cases
by the recent city ordinance providing
penalty for selling liquor to a
minor; and
Whereas: the plea of guilty :"
under this ordinance is an acknowl-
edgment that the liquor was know
ingly and wilfully sold to minor i.
and
Whereas Ordinance No. II of the
city OF Pullman, which is now and has
been continuously in full force and
effect since the date of its passage and
publication, provides that the contract
entered into between the city and the
llcensee becomes null and void when
such licensee fails to fulfill the con-
dltiors under which the license is
granted, one of said conditions being
that liquor shall not be sold to minors
therefore be it
Resolved, that we, the common
council in regular session this 18th
day of April, 1907, do hereby revoke
the license of said Geo. Carisch to sell
intoxicating liquors in the city of Pull
man."
The motion for the adoption of the
resolution was seconded by Councilman
Duthie.
Councilman Lanning then moved
that the resolution be laid on the
table, stating in reply to Mr.. Fulmer's
question as to the reason for the mo-
tlon, that "the resolution was not
brought in good faith, but simply to
harass the council, and that anyway
the Jap enjoyed by the saloon sold
the liquor, and not Mr.. Carisch him
self"
Mr.. Fulmer stated that he believed
all saloons should be treated alike.
and that council that would revoke
Mr.. Frazier's license where no viola
tlon was proven, and without hear
ing, should revoke the Carisch license
gh1rg TO N1oranuu III rner RAW. -
The motion to table was carried,
Councilmen Lanning. Baker, Mcguire,
Staley and Scott voting for it, and
Conucilmen Fulmer and Duthie
against it.
Councilman Fulmer said that he
expected the resolution to meet just
such fate. but he wanted the record
to show the consistency of the council.
A motion was made that "the dog
license ordinance be enforced" " five
councilmen had voted in the affirm
ative when Fulmer's name was called
and he expressed the idea that it was
an absurdity for the council to vote
to enforce law when the presence of
the law on the statute books should be
sufficient reason for its enforcement,
and that it was the duty of the mar
shall to enforce the law without spe-
cific instructions from the council.
After some discussion the mayor took
the same view of the matter, and
ruled the motion out of order.
Bills as follows were allowed and
ordered paid:
Burgan- Emerson Co. supplies, So. 45
o. A. Amos, labor, $3.50.
j. B. Hicks, labor, so.
C. o. Peterson, labor, $42.5O.
Stewart -Clure Hdw. Co., hardware,
SIS. 10.
F. l.. Cochran. labor, $22.O5.
]. F. Cochran, labor, $24.45.
l. H. Waller, team work. S24.OO.
Tom Grow, work on streets, $7.OO.
Harry Young, work on streets, $3.50
Edward Shafer, work on streets,
$500.
R. Lanning, work on streets, $22. 80.
R. F. Douglass, work on streets,
$5.75.
N. White, work on streets, $500.
WIN. Cave. work on streets. $3. 15.
Geo. Walter. stamps, $500.
w. J. Roberts. and three ASSISTANTS,
surveying, $7.25.
]. S. Clark, stamps, $500.