The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-12-04

company vs. R. F. Morrow a judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for sl45. P.
 Circuit Court Dockets
 The following docket is set for trial in Judge Lanes division of the circuit court today:
 Joe w. Vesey vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; G. F. Standfied vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; Ma mic Smith vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; Mark Phillips vs. St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad company, damages; Will Mar tin vs. St. Louis and San Francisco Rail- road company, damages
 The following docket is set for trial in the circuit court before Judge Miller today:
 Weller & Co., vs. Alabama Great South ern Railroad company, damages; R. E. Reno vs. J. D. Whaley, ct al, damages; l. E. Hood Lumber conipany vs. F. B. Clements, assumpsit; Doster- -Northington Drug company vs. J. P. Meroney, assump- sit; D. A. Simpson vs. Mayor and Alder men of Birmingham, damages City Court Dockets. The following docket is set for trial in the first division of the city court today:
 Hamilton Brown Shoe company ct al. vs. E. w. Wood. assumpsit; J. Hawkins vs' l. T. Roberts, appeal by defendant; j. A. Turner vs. William Adams, dam ages; J. T. Scroggans vs. Bertim Jacobs, appeal by plaintiff; Birmingham Paint anL Glass company vs. Gillette & Chand- Ter assumpst; Birmingham Paint and Roofing company vs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad company, appeal by plaintiff; l.. c. Rainer vs. Duncan Liv- cry company, damages; A. Cont vs. Bir- mingham Water Works company, dam ages.
 The following docket is set for trial in the second division of the city court today:
 J. H. Gordon vs. Tennessee Coal Iron and Railroad company damages; R. E. Bridges vs. James P. Sears, damages; J. T. Myric vs. Sayre Mining and Manu- featuring company, damages; J. S. Cog gans vs Sayre Mining and Manufactur- ing company, damages; Ned Kittrell vs Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; Emma Gezzand vs Mayor and Aldermen of Birmingham, damages.
 The following docket is set for trial in the third division of the city court today:
 ]. c. Allsap vs Birmingham Railway
 
 Eddie Kendrick vs. Birmingham Railway Light and Power company. damages; Duke Bennett vs. Western Union Tele- graph company, damages; Joseph June man vs. Short Creek Mining company damages; Johnnie Jones vs Sloss-Shef- field Steel and Iron company. damages William c. Thomas vs. J. C.sMarx Liauor company, damages.
 The following docket Is set in the e,.uity division of the city court today:
 Sallie Fambro Kirby vs. w. w. Adams ct al; Empire Flow company vs. Rien- holdt Huettch; Lula Trice vs. Chesley Trice; l.. E. Jester vs. J. c. Jester; A. c. Creemes vs. Sarah Creemes; Mary Thomas vs. Archie Thomas.
 Chancery Court. In the chancery court yesterday a de- cree was rendered sustaining demurrer in the case of Dock Dowdell vs Wood ward Iron company. In the case of Eddie Leeder vs B. Burnstein ct al decree was rendered overruling motion to dismiss.
 The following docket is set in the chan cery court today:
 M. T. Porter ct al. vs. Atlanta and Birmingham Air Line railway; Julia 44yles vs. William Lyles; E.. s. Kew vs. Jesse Rev; Lathrop Lumber company vs. Sheppard Lumber company ct al {: !, William M. Walker, trustee, vs. Lucy K. Smith ct al.; c. A. Green vs Mary l.. Green; Wyatt Hefln vs. Country club ct all; Mary Ann Whalen vs George Roberts.
 New Suits Filed. Ten suits for damages. aggregating So6000, were filed in the city court yes- terday against the Birmingham Rail way. Light and Power company. The following is a list of the plaintiffs and the amounts claimed in each case: , Pulaski Norfieet, 5000: Maggie Nor fleet. $1000: Hattie McConco. s5O0O; B. Manning, $2000 Elsie Johnson. 5000; Will Jones. 5000: Mamie Collins, 5000; Mamie Gooding s2000 Lizzie Franklin s2000; Mary Sanders, 5000.
 Willie Mae Love filed suit against Macks Real Estate company for 5000 damages for the alleged conversion of certain household furniture.
 William w. Fant claims 5000 damages from the Alabama Great Southern Rail road company for the death of plain ,tiff's son, alleged to have been fatally injured while in the emf loyment of the defendant.
 l Mary Sanders claims 5000 damages from the Louisville and Nashville rail- road for alleged personal injuries.
 The dockets for the spring term in the city court will not be ready for dis t,;t,,t;on bofora upxt Monday owing to