The San Francisco call., 1907-03-25

prizes are the following named con-
testants and their respective scores:
No. Name. Residence. Score.
26-Walter Hamshaw, Berkeley. &c, ,45O
27-Hattie Eden, San Francisco. .27 ,150
2S-Eilen Smith, Walnut Creek. .27,1OO
29-BerkeIey S.P.C.A., Berkeley. 26,SOO
SOW. III. Worden, San Francisco 25,460
31-May Erwin, Fresno 22,2S0
32-Henry Pope, San Francisco. q, $50
33-Anna Skinner, San Francisco 20,e50
34-John Souther, Eimhurst- O,7OO
35-WilIie B. Minck, Bloomfield. $4,000
36-Theresa Coleman, PIT. Rich. 1O,50O
37-R. Winchester, PresidiO, s. F.. 200
Sc. Amador, Boulder Creek. -17,75O
39-J. A. Quinn, San Francisco. 15,7OO
4O-Eme Vaughn, Merced. $500
41-Magda Steinknmp, Rescue. 15,05O
42-Jennie Tibbetts, Hanford. 1880
43-Myra Simmons, berkeley 1880
&c. Stolzenwald, Snn Francisco.12, ,450
45-Howard l.. Sargent, San Jose 1880
4G-L. Sangster, San Francisco. 12,15O
47-HiIda Tilghman, Oakland. II 800
4S-C. McKinnon, San Francisco. $500
49-H. NJ. Andersen, Spreckels- 5000
50-Peari Van Meter, Lafayette. 1850
WORKERS ON THIRD SERIES
Next in line for the third series of
prizes are the following named con-
testants and their respective scores:
No. Name. Residence. Score.
26-EIlen Smith, Walnut Creek. $500
27-Carrie Amador, Boulder Creek $3.50
2S-Magda Steinkamp, Rescue. 3,7O0
20-noy Ibach, San Francisco. $500
30-C. c. A. C.. SausaiitO. 1850
31-Irma Klaumann, Pacific Grove $500
32-Don Campbell, LaMoine. 1900
33-Alex. Burns, San Francisco. 1850
34-Vm. Emerson, San Jose. $500
35-A1bert Dawson, Palo Alto. 1890
36-EtheI Potter, Newman Zoo
37-Eiiz. Bockerman, Alameda. ,450
3s-Geo. III. Angove, SonOma. 1860
39-R Bebergall, San Francisco. 900
40-L. Giunasso, San Francisco. $50
4I-Mary c. Deasy, Nnpa. 500
42-EarI E. Clifford, Alamo. 800
43-MoIIye Sheridan, Stockton zoo
44-Pearl Van Meter. Lafayette. so
ONLY THREE WEEKS LEFT
With but three weeks remaining be-
fore the final grand distribution is
made OF The Calls gold prizes the
would-be winners will have plenty of
work to do. regardless of the state of
the weather. which has for the last
few weeks prevented many of them
from making much headway- With
the exception of a few of the leaders
very slow progress has been made
during the first half of the final
period. Better results must be achieved
IN the IeIlldlIutf VI llc RCllOu, VI q
good many who have been counting on
receiving a share of the gold will get
left.
The lowest score that won prize in
the second period of the contest was
1900 which won for James Anis
Quinn, who was No. 25 at the finish. a
purse of $40. No. 26, Miss Efle Vaughn,
had Just 100 votes less than Master
Quinn, but under the rules of the con-
10
she had secured just one or two more
subscriptions she would have been a
winner instead of Master Quinn.
RULES ON THE SCORES
No contestant in any period should
EXPECT to win with a score of less than
10000 No one in the present period
will be permitted to win with score
less than that of any of the unsuccess-
full candidates in the previous period
The scores of the unsuccessful candi-
dates in the second period will be al
lowed to stand TO their credit in the
third series until twenty FIVE other con-
testants have done better in this
period. It is but fair that those who
failed before should be given another
show to realize something for their
work. and they will accordingly be
given precedence in the awarding of
the prizes for the period over those
who will have smaller scores at the
finish.
Miss Effie Vaughn of Merced. Miss
yJennie Tibbetts of Hanford, Mrs. Ellen
Smith of Walnut Creek, Miss Pearl Van
Meter of Lafayette, Earl e. Clifford of
Alamo and Miss Anna Skinner OF San
Francisco are thus given positions in
the score list for the third period and
will have a chance to win some of the
prize money on their former nonwin-
ming scores until twenty-five other con-
testants have made better scores in
this period.
CHANCE FOR BIG GAINS
Whatever votes these holdover can
didates make in this period will not
be added to their old scores, but will
count in the sweepstakes and will also
constitute a new score for them in the
present period. If Miss Vaughn, for
instance. should receive 5000 votes
today or at any time during the pres
ent period of the contest, they would
not be added to the 1860 carried over
from the former period, but would
make an additional place for her in
the score list. The additional votes
cast for her during the present period
would, however, be added to her total
for the sweepstakes prizes.
The advent of thesf six holdover can