Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1907-04-29
ADDRESS ISSUED
ON SMOKE SUITS
communication 10 Those Inter.
ested in $meIter Fumes
Cases Pending.
SLOW SIGNING AGREEMENT.
hessrs. Mackcy and Miller Warn Inv
teres'ed PARTIES That II is Cheap
er 10 Arbitrate.

a letter. signed by Chairman John
G. AIackay and Vice Chairman Grin
I Miller, Of the committee to repre-
sent the land owners, has been adv
dressed to the farmers Of Salt Lake
county who we're and are interested
In The Godfrey injunction suit against
| inc American Smelling and Refining
| company Arbitration was agreed L
BY both parties. but It seems that much
&elaS Is being Occasioned from the
Iact that MANY Of the persons with
| grievances against the smelter CONF
LILY are backward IN signing up the
afo1trauon agreement The cnlrnlu~
hlca non OF Me%srs NIackey and AflIler
which Is explanatory, follows an
tull: '-'
Io che Farmers OF Salt Lake Valley
Ny nile the suit against the s7nelters
opera ing In the valley known as the
IVVlEey injunction suit was brought
primarily for the benefit of the sign,
ers OF th* agreement, ii was never51e.
TESS expected and intended that s.ch
DeutIl's aS might accrue therefronl
guld lEure 10 The ADVANTAGE of All
VINO OWN homes, or farms in the vail
les' ana ior ihtS reason the commit,
,se wlllcH has had the litigation i'm
G ;.. G, taxes The liberty of address
llS those who are not as We'll 4 IS t1ose
VINO are Sgners Of the farmers agree
lsenI IN relation To the present status
% these smoke cases. and parIict1
taEIS as TO the settlement made with
tue american Smelling and Reflnfnp,
ompany. which has been the subject
o. some criticism.
Nhen the American Smelling and
Rennlng company arst suggested Ia
me committee fhat the question of a
settlement of their difficulties he taxi
cI eP (ReY were Informed IN the lngSt
pQsiilVe amer that no question OF
setIlefnent would be discussed. or con.
*.deted' npIess they could show To the
thllfe satisfaction of the cDn,rnjrr4as
ann such experts as sfev might am.
pioSi that their smelter could ana
Would be operated without damage 10
Inc surrounding property.
@ALleE the most careful and exhaust.
I'VE investigation by The committee OF
Itlf improvements proposed by the
CON loanps as We'll as the agreement
Upon their part to adopt such adJi-
uor0l means Of controlling their gasses
ana DUST as We're suggested by the
CoInmlltebs expert, Dr. ". c. Ebaugh
II seemed 10 be concluslveIy demon
stfaleG that thay could, alter the COM
pletton of these improvements, SO 0per-
ale the plant as to do no damage to
crops or 1--we stock AS it was at 10
Time the purpose Of the committee 20
try to prevent the operation OF the
shelters ii they could operate with
cut uUlnE damage, and as the Aneri-
Fan company demonstrated that they
could SO operate, a settlement was
made which was entirely satisfactory
10 the committee and acceptable to the
company, and the improvements which
they agreed 10 make are now Under
way
Following the usual course of LTD
CATION, before payment to complain
ants In the Godfrey case, for damages
which have been sustained, 1t would
be necessary to submit evidence of
such damage to a master to be appoint
ed By the court, and the length of time
required 10 take such evidence would
defer Indefinitely the time when you
would receive payment for the DAM
ages you have suffered. In order that
this delay might, in some measure, be
avoided, and a speedy settlement of
your claim be secured, It was required
Of the American company, and was
agreed to 10y them, that the proportion
OF such damages as they might he
called upon to pay should be at once
submitted to arbitration, This board
OF arbitration has been appointed, and |
the company has for some time been
ready To proceed with the work OF adj
tustmcnt OF your claims, but progress
Is being delayed by Your failure 10
comply with the necessary |
fornla littos In signing the arbitration
agreement We would urge you 10
take prompt action In this matter and |
Ihus aid the committee In securing foT |
You at an early date, such par, of |
your claim as the American company |
Is to pay
1t has been frequently asked IL claims
lther than those of the sgners of the
'arners' agreement could be submitted |
Ol- arbitration. This question has been
AIKEN up wish the company and they
lave expressed a Willingness 10 allow
III claims whether OF signers to the
greemen1 or not, to be submitted for
ard II you are not "A sign
.r OF the agreement You could submit
'our claim IN the same manner as If
'Ou We're,
CHEAPER TO ARBITRATE
IN the meantime, certain lawyers are
from the farmers the eollec-
ion OF their claims, representing that
" placing your claims In their hands
Ou can secure greater amount, and
btain settpm ent in less time This Is
dt the case and amy money which you
gree 10 pay them is so much lost. as
ou can submit your claim for arbItTsl-