The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-12-30
CIRCUIT COURT
 STILL GRINDING
ALL OTHER COURTS IDLE UNTIL JAN. 6, WHEN SPRING TERM BE- GlNS-cIRcUiT COURTS DOCK ET-CoLEMAN PRESlDES.

With the exception of the two divis- ions of the circuit court all of the Jeff ferson county courts will remain idle this week. On today and tomorrow non jury civil cases will be on trial in both Judge Lanes and Judge Cole mans divisions of the circuit court, these two days concluding the fall term of 1907. These courts will then be idle until January 6, when the spring term for 1908 begins.
 On next Monday the spring term be- gins In all of the county courts All four divisions of the city court will be- gin grinding, jury cases being heard In the first three divisions. In the criminal courts capital felony cases will be heard In the first division, and in the second division the heavy grind on crowded docket will begin.
 Circuit Court Docket.
 The following cases are set for trial in Judge Lanes division of the circuit court:
 George W. Pitts vs. C. B. Powell ct al, assumpsit; Swift & Co. vs. ]. D. Harris ct all, assumpsit; Morris x Co. vs. Whitmore & Co., assumpsit; w. F. Harrell vs. Merchants Cotton company. assumpsIt Birmingham Grain com pany vs. John I. Glover, attachment; Allen Go. vs. Hubbard & Beckwith, attachment; The Cable company vs. Mrs c. Richardson garnish ment. Bril- liant Coal company vs. H. D. Breeding ct al, assumpsit; ozark Orchard com pany vs. Southeastern Brokerage com pany assumpsit; F. D. Fuller vs. Louisville and Nash vile Railroad com- pany appeal by defendant; W. F. Gideon vs. George Lyle appeal by plain tiff k. Blackburn vs. R. D. Burnett, assumpsit; John Jackson ys. W. T. Newberry ct al., appeal by defendant; w. D. Adams vs. Southern Railway company, appeal by defendant; J. c. Thompson vs. Southern Railway com pany, appeal by defendant; Short Creek Mining company vs. J. B. Thompson, appeal by plaintiff; Thomas F. E. Bart lett vs. David Blake, attachment; Joe Bunkley vs. Metropolitan Mutual Bene- fit association appeal by defendant; Dr. Y. E. Holloway vs. S. P. Smith, ar- peal by defendant; A. Shugerman ys. E. D. Coleman, appeal by defendant.
 Judge CoIeman's Docket.
 Judge Coleman will preside in his di- vision of the circuit court today as usual. The following cases are set for trial:
 A. J. Gullahorn vs. Southern Railway company, damages: M. Tannebaum ys Sol Garden, appeal by defendant J. B. Kelley vs. St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad company, appeal by defendant; James Crawford vs. Birmingham Rail- way, Light and Power company. appeal by defendant Davis & Richter vs P Pap- pas, appeal by defendant; Lewis Harvett vs. B. A. Alper, appeal by defendant; D. M. Prince vs. Brewer & Jones, assump- sit; Harry Vaughan vs R. D. Cronk, ap- peal by defendant; Nelson Morris conn., pany vs. Joe Angelic. appeal by defend- ant; Mrs. M. E. Bailey vs. St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad company, appeal by defendant; Henry Witherspoon ys. Birmingham Fertilizer company, appeal by defendant; Barnett-sheppard Lumber company vs. w. R. Prince ct al., assump- sit; S. Garden vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; Robert Cooper vs. w. c. Fitts, appeal by plaintiff; William McGraw vs. Henry Vandeford, appeal by defendant; A. B. Levy vs. Seaboard Air Line Railway company, appeal by defendant; the The- atre Film Service company vs. New York Amusement company. appeal by plaintiff: A w Beck vs. St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad company, appeal by defendant; John D. Wingo company ys Moody Manufacturing company, ap- peal by defendant; J. M Milan vs Louis- vile and Nashville Railroad company, appeal by defendant