Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1907-07-21
LIE DIRECT GIVEN
IN HAYWOOD TRIAL
Continued from First Page.)

Continued from First Page.)
truth. as counsel well knows. and there is
no such record in this case"
IF you say that what have stated Is an
untruth.' replied Hawley in anger. you
utter a. deliberate falsehood.''
barrow renewed his objection. and then
Judge Wood took a nand. He said he
would instruct the jury to disregard all
statements made by counsel not borne out
by the evidence. barrow urged that coun-
sci be prevented from making any state
ment in regard to Steve Adams.
Il object to his saying he brought this
man here to u.s." he continued.
Your honor" said Hawley, 'if you have
ruled l ask that Mr.. barrow ne instructed
to sit down.
Il object" said barrow.
1T Is the CALLED jade that winces," taunt-
ed Hawley
Then VINCE" shouted the opposing at
torney
'Oh. no. gentlemen, have not winced.'
said Hawley, turning at last to the jury.
Backs UP Orchard.
adams is here, and he was brought into
this court and shown to YOU His appear
ance in this room gives the lie to the state
ment made by counsel that the facts are
not as 1 have related them.
There Is just one other man who gould
deny or charge the statement as to Gov.
Peabody. That man is George Pettbone.
If he did not counsel the proposed murder
II he did not furnish the sawed-o6 guns,
why didn't they bring him here to say so?
There is no evidence to contradict Harry
Orchard. Does counsel expect to wipe out
the facts by mere argument? They cannot
do SOP
Carrying forward his address in chrono-
logical order, Mr. Hawley next took up the
Independence depot explosion. He ridicued
the idea that the Mine Owners Association
was responsible for the outrage, and as
serted that the evidence adduced in support
or that theory was either from witnesses
shown to be perjurers or utterly absurd
upon the face of it. The facts were as
stated by Orchard. Steve Adams, whom
Orchard implicated, was not called to con-
tradict him. AS to the dogs being called
off by q detective of the Mine Owners AS
ISOLATION. Mr.. Hawley admitted this to be
true. The dogs supposed to be following
Orchard had gone eight miles from the
scene, whereas the evidence showed Orchard
had mounted a horse mile from the depot
and had ridden some thirty miles or more
before nightfall.
Brings in Pettibone
Bringing his argument down to the at
tempt on the life of F. w. Bradley in San
Francisco, Mr.. Hawley reviewed first the
testimony as to money sent to Orchard In
San Francisco by George A. Pettibone. AS
to the motive against Bradley, 1t was to
show to the world that the federation did
not forget its enemies even after lapse of
years Bradley had been the manager of
the Bunker Hill and Sullivan mine which
was blown up in 1899
Mr.. Hawley recalled to the jury the
testimony regarding the registered letter
sent by j. Wolff in Denver to Orchard in
San Francisco and containing 500. Wolff
a clerk in Pettibone's store, testified that
he sent the letter.
why" asked Mr.. Hawley, did they not
mt pptf ha
his connection with these matters? I will
leave that for them to explain"
Following this letter there was sent to
Orchard by telegraph 800. This was from
Pat Bowen. Then $50 was sent from j.
Wolff. The signatures on both applications
were in the handwriting of George A. Pet
tibone. the attorney declared, and the
money was sent by him to aid Orchard in
was obtained from Haywood and his col
leagues.
This information as to Orchard deposit
ing money with Pettibone and Pettibone
lous, and it belittles an argument to
refer to It. The only evidence they
have is something from Lottie Day.
1t Is not worthy OF consideration. Why,
gentlemen. If Pettbone was acting
legitimately as banker for Orchard. why
didn't he send the money to him in his own
name? Why should there have been an
attempt to mystify or conceal? George
name was not connected with the money
transactions in any way
How Dynamite Acts.
Mr.. Hawley declared that Orchards
statements as to the Bradley explosion
were co-roborated and borne out in every
detail by witnesses introduced by the de-
Tense. AS to the gas theory, Mr.. Hawley
said that Immediately after the explosion
mr. Of ar ha
was natural that the gas company should
be sued. 1t was not to be expected that
the witnesses who testified to the belief
that gas had been the cause. would admit
that they had been absolutely mistaken
and wrong. Gas could not have broken
in the tiled floor of the Bradley vestibule.
as was the case in the explosion Nothing
Mr.. Hawley said the testimony of the gas
expert introduced by the state did away
with the impossible theory that the gas
was ignited by Bradleys cigar.
He also ridiculed the idea that enough
gas could have accumulated to have caused
such a terrific explosion without the odor
being detected throughout the house.
If the hall was filled with gas, as has
been told. Mr.. Bradley himself would have
been asphyxiated before he could have
reached the front door, The fact that moth
ing was burned also upsets entirely the
notion that gas caused the explosion
AS the luncheon recess was ordered until
o'clock this afternoon. Mr.. Hawley an
nounced that he would conclude during the
afternoon.
The Afternoon Session.
Referring to the testimony of DR.. 1. L.
MCGEE of Wallace. Idaho. that he saw
Orchard there during the summer Of 1904,
Mr.. Hawley said Orchard could not have
been there and that DR.. McGee was either
grievously mistaken as to dates or stated
a deliberate talsehoOd.
MCGEE was recently arrested for perjury.
AS to the killing of Lyle Gregory, Mr..
Hawley said the evidence showed that
Gregory was a companion Of Detectives
Scott and Sterling AGAINST whom tn, WaSt.