The Washington herald., 1907-05-14
Equity Court No. I.

CHIEF JUSTICE CLABAUGH
larnar ys. Gideon trustees, sceHjnt confirmed and
distribution ordered Complainants solicitor, John
3. IaufT.
Gates g.. Gates divorce q win mat granted and
rIst0iv Cf children vested in complainant Com
rlaiusHts solicitor " b. Reilly. defendants sulici
far J. g. Foster
Afford vs. Omei argued and submitted Com
UiaiHaufs solicitors T. /. Jefaris and ". Stras-
tusei defraiauts solicitors J. b. Archer and Hal
lam d HaIlsm-
GCttnkieHy vs. Johnson, John J. Br0suan and
James r. Archer appointed trustees. bond. 500
Complainant solicitor, J. J. BrosuaH. defendant 3
-1-.rCr j, b. Archer
Palmer IS. Palmer; leave % amend original bin
granted C1Up'siuaHts solicitors. Evans Benson d
PD.tney; defendants solicitors, John Rid7ut and J.
h. iauC
ChHds vs.. ChHds Attorney W c. English ap-
pointed 70 defend Cunplsnauts solicitor. Joseph
A Brrksrt-
Baldwin vs. Baldwin. divorce a vim mat granted
with leave % rcsrme maiden name. COMPLAINANT s
solicitors. Campbell Csrriugtou and S. ID. Trlitt,
dCterisuts solicitor J. 2. Laskgv.
Smith vs. Smith. cause ra-referred 90 examiner
Complainant solicitor, T. X McNeil defenGant's g
solicitor Fountain Pes'6n
Assignments for to-day.
No. E9. Atkinson q Ballard Company vs.. stod-
dert. Attorney. George T.. Gertmau.
No. 3l Wilson Us. Wilson. Attorneys Leigh
Rohirs7n-John ". Daddge
No. g1 Bundv vs. Bundy. Attorneys. A W
Sc1tt-FOunrau Peyt0n
No. E5-Lane IS lane. Attorneys William C.
Bsldcrsrn--J. T. Campbell
No. 81. RILEY rs. Riley. Attorneys. steaman-
J. Wilmer Lstim5r
No 80 Patton vs. Patton Attcrneys William
+ Matting'y-Raym1nd Dickcy John BiiCut
No E3. Cunningham vs.. Cunningham. Attorneys.
S. D. Truitt-Clsvton =. Emig
No Z5 THhhy vs.. Tribby Attoneys. Greed NJ
s..fa- u
Motion iG. Matthews vs.. Matthews Attorneys.
Z. y. Hopewell-Edvard O. kimbalI.
Equity Court No, 2.
JUSTICE GOULD.
NCtfer vs. GRAY. rIle 70 show cause. rsturuable
NAV Il. Compliments solicitor. J. H. Haydeu
Pickf0rd Ts. Collins; restraining ORDER Complain
ants solicitors Cole & Donaldson.
Walker vs.. Baldwin; Tro c0ufCsso. against certain
defendants ordered Ccmulainant's solicitor. B. F.
Leighton: defendants solicitors. 7. B. Linton and
Newton & Giett.
CabHl vs.. Cahill; receiver discharged. Complain
ants solicitor. J. +. Potbury defendants solicitor.
J. J. Darlington.
meut. Complainant solicitor Campbell Cauingtoui
defendants solicitors Mcneil & Mcneil
Nag1ire Us. Burke; decree UvgrUliug demurrer
Ccmplauant's solicitor c. A. kciggin
Reinberg RCinberg, rule 20 show csuse; retlirn7-
bic NAV Y. Complainant solicitor. Leo T. Harlow
defendants solicitor Campbell Darlington.
Hurdle Is. Hurdle. auditors report confirmed
CCmplaiusuts solicitor. Wilton ]. Lambert
Pierce vs.. Frizzcll; argued and submitted Com
rlaigsnts solicitors, T. /. Jcf1ords and ". T.
LcstJr. defendants solicitor. ". j. FriUeH.
Edwards Sc Maupn; leave 90 amend granted
Cmplainants solicitors. Robinson & Robinson; de-
fendauts solicitors, Douglas & Douglas.
Assignments foT to-day;
No. rs Langley VS.. dAudigne. Attorneys, 4, A.
Hoehling- Hamilton & Colbert, Biruey, Tucker
Gordon a Gordon
No. 90. Rhodes IS Smith. Attorneys. Toomey-
Sullivan.
No 29i. Harris vs. Lewis. Attorneys, Collins-Bar-
nard Il Johnson John Rid0ut.
No. 800. Norris vs.. Ashford. Attorneys, Hallam
& Hallam-Davidce & Blair