The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-12-03

stein was on trial when plaintiff took a non-suit.
 The case of Weller & Co. vs Alabama a Birmingham Air Line Railway com pany Is on trial and will be resumed t-ls morning.
 The following docket is set in the cir cut court before Judge Miller today:
 Mrs. J. Roloff vs. Charles w. Me5hee. damages; C. T. Walt vs Michael Clifford ct al, damages; Barnett & Sheppard Lumber company vs. NJ. s. Carson, as- sumpsit; w. w. Driggers vs St Louis ana San Francisco Railroad company. damages; H. E. Scheinert vs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad company, dam ages.
 City Court.
 In the first division of the city court yesterday a default Judgment for 5000 was rendered in the case of s. P. Storrs vs. W. G. Robinson.
 The following cases were dismissed: :: R. Knauff & Co. vs. Jennie E. Torrey. Mildred Rauv vs. Birmingham Bottle Supply company, Mary Sadler vs. II. Ioventhal, c. l.. Guice vs. Birmingham Boiler works.
 The case of C. A. Wickersham vs. Alabama Steel and Wire company is on trial. The plaintiff claims damages for the alleged wilful and malicious cut
 
 by him.
 The following docket is set in the first division of the city court today:
 Buckeye Buggy company vs. Ala . bama Livery company, assumpsit; A. J. Krebs Co. Vs. J. Marx ct al, as sumptis; Mary F. Tarwater vs John $. Goings ct als., assumpsit; Birming- ham Sand, Lime, Brick and Stone Man ufacturing company vs. Thomas & (.1 icl,, B. Martin, administrator, vs. J. c. Ber- ry assumpsit; Mrs. G. w. Brantley vs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad com pany appeal by defendant; George Fla gan vs Pilgrim Rest Baptist church ct als., ejectment; M. Cornelius & Son ct al. vs. F.. s. Bell & Co. ct al., as sumpst; Benjamin Lewis vs. Edgar L.. Parker. assumpsit B. F. Roden Grocery company vs. B. Caravelo, assumpsit; i; United Electric company vs. R. An derson, appeal by defendant
 In the second division of the city court yesterday the case of W. R. Car michael, administrator. vs. Tennessee Coal and Iron company was settled and dismissed.
 Arthur Morgan vs. Birmingham Rail- way, Light and Power company, settled and dismissed.
 The following docket is set in the second ulN1SlOn I-lne GUY court touh5 .
 James Roelen vs. Sheffield company damages: Ira Dement, vs Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company damages; Jasper Tn omas, admin1stra- tor, vs. Birmin gham Railway. Light and Power company damages William C. Howell vs. North Birmingham dam ages; Limon w. owen Ys. North Bir- mingham, damages; Charles E. Cole Ns North Birmingham, damages; Gaines Dixie ys. Tennessee Coal, Iron ana Railroad company, damages; Loveman J. Price vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages.
 Owing to the absence of Judge Sharpe no business was done in the third division of the city court yes terday
 The following docket is set for to- day in the same division:
 P. M. Wood vs. Sloss-S Sheffield Steel and Iron company, damages; Miles Brown vs. Central of Georgia Railroad company, damages, John c. Park vs. Cement Solvay company damages; Jeff ferson D. Salter vs. c. D. Smith X Co. ct. al, damages; Chapman Blount vs, w l.. Delheim X Co. ct als, dama ges; ; M. M. Huff vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; Alice Boyd vs. Birmingham Railway Light and Power company, damages
 All cases set in the equ1ty uiVlsion ol the city court yesterday were passed and the following docket is set for today; Carlo Carletto vs. Julia Carletto; Steve Griffin vs. Sallie Griffin; Abner Glass ct al. vs. Frank G. Daniels; B. T. Bailey vs. Dashe Bailey; Pearl Lockett vs. How ard Lockett Bertha Jones vs. Jefferson Jones.
 Chancery Court.
 Tn the chancery court yesterday the cases of the Alabama National bank vs. Victor Gage and William Baker vs. M. C.. Jackson ct al. were dismissed
 Dock Dowdell vs. Woodward Iron com pany submitted on demurrer.
 Argument of counsel were made in the case of Martha Neal vs. Minnie Neal ct al
 The following docket is set in the chan cery court today:
 Martha Rubley vs. Emil Rubley; Dock Doweli vs. Woodward Iron company; Austin Pope vs. Susie Pope; Nose Mack lin vs. Beuah Maclklin; Henry Austin vs. Florence Austin; Long-Lewis Hardware company vs Mrs. Mamie Wallace; John R. Copeland vs. Norman Morris ct al; Annie Lou Carlisle vs. Frank Carlisle; J. w. Cottingham vs. G. R. Hamlet.
 -----
 Nri.S,i,,,I COurt