The Montgomery advertiser., 1907-02-19

 ped Mr. Jerome.
 ~rhat would depend on the classinsr' said Dr. Evans.
 T would call It deveiopmentai in' sanity?"
 was it paranoiaf'
 aNo.n
 Were the deiusious which you op. served during your first three yisits te Thaw systematized or not syssemasilS' edT'
 They were in measure systemat'
 were they systematixed or not sys' tematized?' repeated Mir. Jerome sharp
 They were not altogether system atized."
 In what respect were the deiusions not systematized."
 Dr. Evans began long answer In which he referred to the conversations he had with Thaw. MT. Jerome op- jected and stopped him. MT. Deimas af once insisted that he be allowed to go on. MT. Jerome refused to allow him to continue, and by consent the entire answer was stricken out and pr. Evans was asked the question again.
 He shifted from one delusive idea to another"
  was not connected with what might he termed the parent deiusion about stanford White and his relations witn women 7''
 .aThere was his delusion that repu- table lawyers and physicians were in conspiracy to railroad him on to an asylum the parent deiusion," said Mir. Jerome.
 q would consider It as largely in- dependent. could see no reason why he should connect me with any conspiracy against him.. "pfd he?"
 No; but he was suspicious or me and everyone"
 was not that a systematized deiu- sion"
 Tt might be taken that way" What kind of insanity is indicated | by svstematical delusions?" "Paranoic insanity.r "Do the will and codicil show sys- | tenatized delusionsT' Yes" 'wbat deiusionr'
 "A delusion which showed he be- | lieved he was the subject of perseru. l tion, that he was being hunted down. : | Doctor, without re-reading these | papers, can you state whether or not there is parent dclusion regarding | whiter' T don't say that there but ther, is delusion both in the will and thu 1 codicil.''
 ''That is not an answer" | MT. Jerome asked the question ovel and over again. Mir. peimas objected to Mir. Je, 1 rome's course. 'T do not think he has a right to continue this simply because l ka district attorney wants him to-" he | said.
 "FIe has answered as wanted"
 why do you keep repeating 1t tnenf' | asked Mir. Delmas.
 "Because do not want him to fall 1T a hole without seeing the hole" There | was a general laughter | Mir. Jerome then asked again if tho | will or codicil showed parent delusion
 T can't say that it is, parent delu. sion"
 DO you know what parent deiusior isT'
 "Yes."
 Then do you find it in this will oi codicliT
 q can't subscribe to 1t as a parent de- fusion, there Is an apparent delusion---a well defined delusion."
 Can't you tell whether it is a parent 1 delusion?" T can't say whether it is or not" Jerome Drives Home. Why did not you say so beforeT' asked you the question half dozen | times. And the witness replied half dozen l times" interrupted Mir. Delmas
 When was the will executed?'' asked Mir. Jerome.
 "In 1905.''
 How did you find that outY | tsT fn hAe xraa and the others
 Do you know when the codicil wal oxecuted?' assume at about the same time"
 "The will bears it's own date" sug- l gested MT. Delmas.
 T know it does. but this witness says he assumes the date. That shows how carelessly he read it."
 Mir Jerome asked the witness to point out in the will single systematized de- fusion.
 nr. Evans started to read.
 Don't do that" commanded MT. Je- rome.
 You told me to-" said Dr. Evans.
 T did not"
 Justice Fitzgerald ordered the orig inal question read and then ruled that the witness had the right to read from the will in replying to the question.
 Dr. Evans then read what he called Paragraph 8. 1t provided in part:
 Item For Prosecution.
 "In case I die other than a natural death. or If any suspicion attacnes 10 my taking off, or if I should be made away with. I direct that my executors shall immediately set aside S5O,000 for an Investigation of the circumstances and for the prosecution of the guilty persons"
 "'can you point to any other unsys- tematized delusfonT'
 "The provision in the will which I read Is such a delusion."
 What elsc"'
 'I see in these documents evidences of insane delusions. They show deln- sions that are evidences of an unsouna mind" said DF. Evans.
 MT. Delmas, when Mir, Jerome dn- ished with his preliminary cross-exam- nation, offered the codicil in evidence
 Mir. Jerome objected to the introduo- tion of the document.
 There Is in this will a reference to a third document, signed and sealed at the same time as the will and codicil, and all three must go fin at the same time," protested Mir. Jerome
 we have proved" replied Mfr Delmas, that this paper was in exiss- ence long before June 25. and this ex- pert has testified that 1t contained evil dences of insanity. We are not offsr ing 1t as a part of anything else, but as separate document. offer 1t with out reference to other papers,"
 This paper is introduced to show insanity in the defendant" insisted MT. Jerome. "and we are entitled to all the documents signed al the same ffuna f ui1aafioD fha Ytpht nf c0t1n apl