The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-11-04
RECORD OF THE COURTS

Jury cases will be on trial In the circuit. city and first division of the criminal court this week. Juries will be organized at 10 o'clock this morn ing. A two-weeks' term of capital felony cases begins today.
 In the first division of the city court this morning the trial of the case of J. w. Donnelly vs. E. w. Howze will be resumed.
 In the third division of the city court the case of Mrs. Nora Philips, admin istratrix, vs. the Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company will be re- sumed.
 Circuit Court Dockets.
 The following docket Is set in Judge Colemans division of the circuit court today:
 Tom Davis ct all, administrators, vs. c. M. Burkhalter & Co., damages; J. Williams vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company. dama ges; Maryland Nelms vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron and ] Railroad company damages Nora R. Curry vs. W. H. Hyronemous, attach . ment; J. L Garner vs Western Union Telegraph company, damages; !. D.. Evans vs Western Union Telegraph company. damages; George Dryer vs. Sloss- Sh effield Steel and Iron company, damages; Ralph Caravella vs. C. c. Tetherow ct al damages John Trib- ble vs. M, ". Jones, appeal by de- fendant; c. B. Mitch ell assignee, vs. Mrs. Eppertus P. Huguley, assumpsit.
 The following docket is set In Judge Lanes division of the circuit court to- day:
 Mamie Caldwell vs. J. W. Rarden ct all. damages; Mrs Nellie M. Houston vs. Mfs. K. O. Ware ct al, dama ges i; Steadman Hosey, administrator, vs. Bessemer Machine and Foundry com pany, dama ges Odo Pasquale vs. Ala = bama Great Southern Railroad com pany damage Mary J. Hooks vs Mrs. Mary Echols. appeal by defendant; John Wilson vs. Payne & Joubert Machine and Foundry company damages; l.. T. Lavender vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company. dana ges; Rufus Hatchett vs. Birmingham Rail way, Light and Power company dam ages; Jane London vs. St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad company, dam ages; Mary Brewer vs Birmngha m Railway, Light and Power company. dama ges.
 City Court Dockets.
 The following docket Is set in tn e first division of the city court today Drennen & Co. vs. ]. W. Edwards, certiorari by defendant Commercial National Bank of Council Bluff, la, vs Alabama Steel and Wire company, as- sumpsit; ". II. Dickson vs. Buell. Min ing company. garnisnment sum mons B. F. Eborn vs. J. E. Dorse garnishment on summons; The Com mercial Printing company vs. Inde- pendent Order of Beavers, assumpsit {; Merrihard Sch oal & Co. vs. j. Ropert & Bros, ct al, assumpsit, E. Rittenberry vs. Jack Cross, certiorari by defend ant Birmingham Cotton and Stock Ex- change vs. c. F. Brown. assumpsit: : Wimberly & Thomas Hardware Co. vs. W. F. Bowen, assumpsit' Sims x White ct als. vs. Mitchell Lumber com pany. assumpslt; Sheppart & Son ct all vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company appeal by defend ant; w. E. Spear vs. P. Thornton Mayre ct als, attach ment.
 The following docket is set in the sec ond division of the city court today;
 Connata Scipio vs. Pioneer Mining and Manufacturing company ct al. damages F. T. Norris vs. Birmingham Belt Rail road company, damages; w. II. Holloway vs Birmingham Railway. Light and Power company. damages; A. R. Aldrich vs. R. Knauff x Co, ct al, damages; Avondale steam laundry vs. Phillip Ca rey Manufacturing company. ct al, dam. ages: Charlotte Turner, admnistratrix, vs Alabama Steel and Wire company. damages; Rertie Taylor, administratrix. vs Warrior Manufacturing company, damages Martha Gilbert vs. Birmingham railway. Light and Power company, dam ages; W. N Norwood ys. Edwards J. Thornton damages, J. r. Mcclure. pro ami. vs Woodward Iron company dam ages; P. r. Alexander vs. seaboard Air Line Railway company damages. The following docket Is set in the third division of the city court today: John Miles vs. Birmingham Railway,