The Birmingham age-herald. [volume] (Birmingham, Ala.) 1902-1950, 1907-03-19
RECORD OF THE COURTS


The business in the courts this week is
somewhat disorganized by the presence Of
carpenters and masons pulling down walls
and putting UP partitions to make ac
commodations for the new Judges. The
nrst division OF the city court is prac-
tically out of business while the cases
set for trial in The second division are
being heard on the third floor. Jurtes
were organized in the circuit and CITY
courts. but no cases were tried. several
judgments were rendered and cases dis
missed. The motion for new trial in
the Wray case came up at o'clock YES
terday afternoon and was passed until
10 o'clock this morning. In the chancerv
court decree was renederd dissolving
the injunction in the case of Wyatt Hef-
lin VS.. the Country club.
Circuit Court.
In the circuit court yesterday, Judge
Lane presiding. the following judgments
were rendered:
w. Fl. Gwin vs. Louisville and Nash
Vile Railroad company; consent Judgment
for s110.
Circuit Court Docket.
The following cases were dismissed for
want of prosecution:
Bessemer Foundry and Machine COM
pany VS.. Hoffman Mcneil; W. J. Nc
Neill, pro ami, VS.. w. A. Scott; Jennie
McElmell VS.. V. c. Teeter; Nick Hawkins
VS.. St Louis and San Francisco Railroad
company A B. Headen vs. Western
Union Telegraph company.
In the case of w. 8. Scott VS.. j. D.
Carlisle the defendant took non-suit
The following docket is set in the cir
cult court today
General Frazier vs. Avondale Mills,
damages; j. l.. Garner VS.. Western Union
Telegraph company, damages; Oscar
Shook VS.. Louisville and Nashville Rail-
road company damages; Cumberland
Mills VS.. j. w. Clatyon, assumpsit John
Doe, ex dem, VS.. Henry Reims, ejectment.
City Court.
In the first division of the city court
yesterday the following cases were dis
missed for want of prosecution:
Lottie Ann Jonee VS.. Mrs. BETTE jolly
ct al; Frank Williams VS.. Alabama Brew
ing company.
First Division Docket.
The following docket is set in the first
division of the city court today:
T. ID. Moore VS.. mayor of the town of
Avondale, certiorari; the National Meter
company VS.. North Birmingham, assump-
sit; j. X. P. Laird VS.. Tennessee Coal,
Iron and Railroad company, damages;
James c. Xix VS.. Southern Railway COM
pany, damages; Hettie Coleman VS.. Bir-
mingham Railway, Light and Power COM
pany, damages; Lula Anderson VS.. Bir-
mingham Southern Railroad company,
damages.
In the second division of the city court
the following cases were dismissed:
I. NJ. Thompson VS.. Palos Coal and
Coke company; B. F. Patrick VS.. E. w.
Ewing; Barnett Lumber and Manufacture
ing company VS.. George w. Hicks; A H.
Woodward VS.. Republic Iron and Steel
company.
Second Division Docket.
o. L. Craig VS.. the Mey Trading COM
pany damages; Wertheimer-Swartz Shoe
company VS.. Eagle & Green, garnishment:
American Jobbing association VS.. H. W.
Sweat, assumpsit; d. r. Loftin VS.. G.
Rotholz, appeal: w. r. Alexander vs. st.
Louis and San Francisco Railroad COM
pany, appeal ]. N. McCraney VS.. st.
Louis and San Francisco Railroad COM
pany, appeal; w. A. Peterson VS.. R. l..
Leatherwood, appeal; Red Diamond
Clothing company VS.. Birmingham Ore
and Mining company, appeal; Charley Nc
Clendon VS.. st. Louis and San Francisco
Railroad company. appeal; John Kelley
VS.. Silvia Kelley, appeal Aaron Durr VS..
w. P. Gideon, appeal; Benton Bros. vs.
c. F. Roll certiorari; Max j. Winkler
Brokerage company, certiorari; Charley
Libe VS.. St. Louis and San Francisco
Railroad company, appeal: B. E. Norwell
VS.. l.. c. Blackwell, certiorari; John
Marchman VS.. Hugh Tulley, certiorari
chancery Court.
In the chancery court yesterday, Chan
cellor Benners rendered a decree dissoly-
ing the injunction against the Country
club which had been granted at the in
stance of Wyatt B. Helm. The dissolu-
ton of the injunction permits the re-
spondents to make and execute the new
lease with the Birmingham Realty COM