The Bennington evening banner. (Bennington, Vt.) 19??-1961, 1907-04-19
DURABILITY OF
BRIGHT'S DISEASE
( By the Editor Of the Town and Coun
try JournaiJ

Personally, ] have pot believed that
chronic Brights Disease Is durable,
aud this for tao distinct reasons.
First-Mcdical works class u a. Ia
durable aud fatal.
Second-Those have known Who
had 10 have died.
Result look with dlsirust upon ali
claims Of alleged specifics.
Durirg my recent visit 10 San Fran
cisco heard the president OF the PACT
DC states Type Foundry claim that
chronic Brighrs Disease was nov a.
durable a. la grippe. | said ] would
like 10 believe Il.
lie took me 10 hand. The statements
ol huIdreds we're exhibited To me
many we're 40 marvellous that they had
bsen sworn ~ aud sealed by notarics.
then manifested a desire TO zee
some 81 The parties themselves. The
recoveries have been so numerous Ia
San Francisco that We do not have 10
20 four blocks 10 any one direction.
ln i've minutes We we're 10 the pres
ence Of one oi the best known mer.
chants ~ the city. Has been Ia bust
ness on the same spo. 81 years. lie
said he had had both Bright Disease
and Diabetes ADD bad been given up,
but had completely recovered. Gave
IL a. his belief that eight.tenlhs OF all
cases we're durable under the new spec.
Tic. We next called on ooe Of the big
insurance men on California street
lie aid his son was swollen with drop
~ from Brigbt's Disease and hisdeath
vas daily expected when he vas put on
the treatment lie IL now an athlete.
We called on the editor Of one Of San
Francisco's greA, dAilies who had a
physician test IL out In his Own. the
ply sician's l case, the latter being u
hopeless diabetic. 10 six months he
was we'll. The bead OF another large
insurance company on Montgomery
street vas next seen-he was In bed In
November last In q critical condition
due 10 chronic Brights Disease. He
vas we'll and In his Office and also
told Of friend OF his who was In con.
vulsions when put on the treatment
and vas nov out on the street We
wehi 10 the Office Of an ex.supreme
Judge and also another editor, both Of
whom had recovered.
| declined 10 20 further Although
there we're hundreds more To see, u was
useless. II Human testimony from the
very best people Is worth anything, the
books are wrong, and chronic Brights
Disease and Diabetes, even In extreme
cases, are positively durable. Ethics
ought not 10 be permitted Ia obscure
this discovery and In the interest OF
those readers Of this paper whose
homes NAV have one Of these blighis
upon IL. ! now declare the facts and
will see that any Of them desiring IL
may 10 sent foil literature. Tho name
Of the discovery should be- stated. II
Ia known as Fulion's Compound.
Many broad physicians are using The
new diuretic. but In view Of the terrific
annual death list In the United States
from Bright's Disease, NEARLY G0,OO0l
the fact that medical ethics prevent
them from proclaiming the discovery
to the world, because the formula IL the
personal property OF individuals, 10
this instance practically amounts 10 .
public calamity.-Towu and Country
journal, san Jose, Cal, July number
1905.
n anyone having knowledge OF n
case Of Brlghls Disease or Diabetes
will send Us the name and address, ve
will see that they are sent full Literature
concerning this remarkable discovery
Represented 10 Bennington by w
l.. Gokay and b. a. Qulnlan, drug
gists.