The Washington herald., 1907-10-18
Circuit Court No. 1.

JUSTICE WRIGHT
Corbett vs. Fennug; Iug respited until Monday.
Plaintiffs attorney, R p Erans; DEFENDANTS at
toneys. J. 5 Easby smith and B. ". Parker.
Motions for to-day
No. Yandergrift vs. Lansburgh 6 Bro At
torueys. Gies-Wolf & Rosenberg
No. ? TyssoEsh ~ T. II. Smith Company. At
t1ruoys. NilS0n-B8lston & Siddons
No. 8 Columbia Marble Quarry Company vs.
Dunn Attorneys, Biruey & Woodard-Burkart
No 4. Wulige. Gibbs & Daniel vs. Bowen At
tUrueys. johnson 4 Balderst0n-Rslst0n X Siddons.
No. 8. Willige, Gibbs & Daniel vs.. Kirby At
tomeys. Lester * Balderson-Soh0n & Colbert
No. 6. Riley Us. Bohn. Attorneys. Thomas &
JefoFds-D Darlington.
40. z Hight rs. Moore. Attorneys, Mathews &
Bowen -Bisnsy < Woodarl.
No e Madre vs. Norwich Union Fire Insurance
Company. Attorneys. Richards-Baker Sheehy &
Hogan.
Assignments for Monday. October q. 1867:
No. 81 Schneider rs. American Bridge Company.
Attorneys. Evans. Benson & PoultDey-R. 5. Huide-
koper
No 81 smith IS Tribby. Attorneys. W. G.
Gardiner and T. \. HopeWelI-Howard BOYD and
.. /. VI. Brown.
No III Burrows vs.. LLsner. Attorneys. " L
Amhro>e-Leon TohTiner.
No AZ. Benson rs Metropolitan Life Insurance
/ Company Attorneys, Hayden Johnson-BeTy &
Minor
No IG Foster vs. Congregation Talmud Torah.
-At-ttLttf~r - ~ NftNF-tstHn ANtIMtTs
No 81 kieny vs. Altelnus. Attorneys, Archer &
Smith-Witon J. Lambert
No. Is. Hazard Us. Riley Attorneys. Y. d Wal
lace-T. L. JeFords
No Y. Jones vs.. Steaman Attorneys. Barnard
q Johus0n-Arthur Peter.
No. g. Bowen vs.. Alexandra and Potomac Rail
road Company. Attorneys. Hayden johnson and
Darlington x CaringtUu-J. J Darlington.
No l07. Fugtt rs, Drake & Strattou Company.
Attorneys, Lemud FuEitt-W, C. sullivan.
Circuit Court No. 2.
JUSTICE ANDERSON.
Owen rs. Washington RaiiYsy and Electric Com
rany; verdict for defendant Plaintiffs attorneys,
Mcneil 4 Mcneil; defendants attorneys. J. J.
Darlington and ". C. SULLIVAN
Beal Is Chgett: vtiiict for plaintiff for S4 50.
Plaintiffs attorney, G. 7. Hendler; Defendants at
torney, Smith Thompson, IT,
Dale Shafer; Fry respted until Monday.
Plaintiffs attorney. l. : Bailey, defendants attoF-
neys. c. J. T. Graf and Edwin Forrest
Motions for to-day:
No l. Smith IS Fuller Company Attorneys,
Padgett 4 FoHest-E ;. Duvan. u.
No p Miller shoemaker Realty Company vs. Stur-
geon. Attorneys. l. T. Everett-Hayden johnson
No 3 Redmond vs.. Parsons. Attorneys. r, G.
Doualdson-TuckeT & Kenyon.
No 4. Bates vs.. Drake. Attorneys, Lambert &
Mclean and X. H Yeatman-E IL Thomas
No 5 Latmer vs.. Grew. Att0rneys. J. W. Lati-
mer-P. Z. Hilliard.
Ne. B. ThhrntOn vs.. Harlow. Attorneys, J. s,
Easily y-Smith-Bean & HOehling
No Z Cleveland vs.. Harris Attorneys. Downing
& BeTy-AicNaInara 6 Hodges.
No. 6. Rowland vs., Anaco=tia and Potomac Rail.
road Company. Attorneys, H. ", Wheatley-J. J.
Darlington.
No. g. L0hT vs. Title and Guaranty Connpsnv.
Attorneys ". c. Balderston-Gittings & Chamber.
lm
No. 10 United States OK rel EckloF vs.. West,
Attorneys Lambert & MCLean-E. II Thomas
No. L. ZiTkel Michael. Attorneys, Daish &
Thomas -Biney & GieS.
No. z. Pillsbuy Zeh. Attorneys, Daisb &
Thomas-C. J. f. Graf
Nc. l3. Henderson vs. PiHtsch Gas Company. At.
torneys. A. 5 rthingtou-McKenney & Flaunery
Assignments for Monday. October q. 1907:
No. l8 Godsby Washington Railway ard
Electric Company. Attorneys. Darlington 4 John
son-J J. Darlington,
No. 81. Davis vs.. Anacostia and Potomac Railroad
Company. Attorneys. ". G. Gardiner and +. n
Hopewell-J. J. Darlington.
No g. Taylor vs. Warield- Attorneys L. J.
Mather and 4. Z. Horner-D. W Baker
No. s., Poates vs.. National Correspondents In
stitute. Attorneys, w. c. PTentiSs-E l. Gies.
No. ia. Waring vs., Clemence. Attorneys, NJ n
Richards0n-H0ward Boyd
No. l45 Costello Is. Palmer. Attorneys, Z. J.
MatheT-Nathaniel Wilson