The Ocala evening star. [volume] (Ocala, Fla.) 1895-1943, 1907-11-22
Common Law Gases

defendant.
Common Law Cases
l. YOnge & Cline Co. VS.. Atlantic
Coast Line railroad company: action
/ at law. Hooker & Duval attorney IS
/ for plaintiff: r A Burford for defen-
dant
2. William Young VS.. Susie Brad
dock: ejectment R McConathy Tor
plaintiff: H. NJ. Hampton for def4a-
dant
3. George MacKay VS.. Hall & Thag-
ard: action at law. c. L. Sistrunk
for plaintiff; Hooker & Duvai for de-
PENDANT.
4 Stringfellow & Doty Co vs.. Gibson
& Gibson; action at law. a. H. kim
for plaintiff; c. L. Sistrunk for de-
PENDANT
5. ]. + Orr Shoe Co. VS. Carter &
Anderson: assumpsit. L. T. Izlar for
plaintiff; H. Davis for defendant.
6. d. J. Greenfield vs.. Carter & An
dersOn: assumpsit. l.. T. IZlar tor
plaintiff; H. Davis for defendant.
4. Pollock & Bernheimer VS.. Chas.
W. Driver, ct al; assumpsit; Forces
ter & Burton for plaintiffs; H. L. An
dersOn for defendants.
s. Armstrong, Gator & Co. VS.. Chas.
w. Driver, ct al: assumpsit. Forester
& Burton for plaintiffs; II. L. Andec-
son for defendants.
9. Old Dominion Pants Mfg Co. W.
Chas. w. Driver CT al; assumpsit.
Forester & Burton for plaintiffs; IL.
L Anderson for defendants.
10. John f Hurst & Co. vs.. Chas.
w. Driver, ct al; assumpsit Forces
ter & Burton for plaintiffs, II. L. An
dersOn for defendants.
IL. Meinhard, Schaul & Co. VS.. Chas.
w. Driver ct al: assumpsit. Forces
ter & Burton for plaintiffs H. L. An
derson for defendants.
IL. Strauss Bros. VS.. Chas w. Driver.
ct al; assumpsit. Forester & Bur-
ton for plaintiffs; H. l.. Anderson for
defendants.
13. l. & S. Bing VS.. Chas w. Driver
ct al; assumpsit Forester & Bur-
ton for plaintiffs; H. L. Anderson for
defendants.
IA, Arnold Hat Co. vs.. Chas. w.
Driver, ct al; assumpsit. Forester &
Burton for plaintiff; H. L. Anderson
for defendants.
Is. Geo. D. Witt Shoe Co. US. Chas
w. Driver ct al: assumpsit. Forces
ter & Burton for plaintiff; H. L. An
dersOn for defendant.
Is. J. NJ. T Carter VS.. Martel Lum-
Der Co; assumpsit. L. T. Izlar for
plaintiff; H. L. Anderson and H. NJ
Hampton for defendants.
Il. Harry Hamilton VS.. A. E. MaXey;
assumpsit. L. T. Izlar for plaintiff; r.
McCOnathy for defendant
IS. Ethel Crosby. an infant, by her
next friend, j. w. Crosby, VS.. Atlantic
Coast Line railroad company; action
at law r. L. Anderson for plaintiff;
r. A. Burford for defendant.
10. DunnellOn Phosphate Co. VS.. At
lantic Coast Line railroad company;
assumpsit. o. T. Green and Bisbee &
Bedell for plaintiff; r. a. Burford cor
defendant.
20. Edward c. Mcleod vs.. Florida
Lime Co; assumpsit. H. L. Ander-
son for plaintiff; Hooker & Duval fer
defendant.
p. Lang, Swartz & Co. VS.. c. B. NAL
lard and c. y. Kirkland; assumpsit.
R. L. Anderson for plaintiff; r. B. Bull
lock for defendant.
% H G. Eagleton VS.. c. NJ. Living;
stan: assumpsit. G. L. Sistrunk for
plaintiff: H L. Anderson for defen
dant.
%. Viola Smoak VS. Atlantic Coast
Line Railroad Company. Assumpsit.
r. l.. Anderson for plaintiff. r. a Bur
ford for defendant.
"a. w. w. Clyatt VS.. W. s. West. as
sumpsit. Hooker & Duval for plain
tiff. r. A Burford for defendant.
%. Henry a. Schoeflin, (use Of ]. ".
PEARSON VS.. f. T. Helvenston. Eject
ment. H. L, Anderson for plaintiff. Z.
L. Sistrunk for defendant.
90. Hopes Bros. & Darlington ".
Crane & Mcmahon; assumpsit. H. l..
Anderson for plaintiff; f. ]. LEngie,
-ASleit ~ tbIleillildIl anu y. l.. h-IStl hl44N
for defendants
p. John W. Pearson vs. Hall &
Bigham; trover. II. NJ. Hampton for
Plaintiff; Hooker & Duval for defen-
dants
IS Jennie Whitfield vs.. H. G. Jones:
eiectment H. L. Anderson for plain
tiff: f. ". Davis for defendant.
% Valena Meginny vs.. H. G. Jones:
ejectment. II. L. Anderson for plain
tiff: E W Davis FOR defendant.
So MeGehee Lumber Company -.
Seaboard Air Line railway company.
nc.inr q low II. I Anderson and L