Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1907-06-11
Mr.. Arthur Heine also remained in Switzer-

Mr.. Arthur Heine also remained in Switzer-
land in charge of the factory.
Before l went to Europe, and after l
came back, l was in the receipt daily of
cables letters from Arthur Heine,
cOuched in endearing terms which l pur-
pose using upon the trial of my suit.
''In January last l received cable from
the New York office, directing my imme-
date return, and l reached here January
"a. l was met at the pier by the general
manager of the New York branch, who
told me that l had been sent for because of
reports which had reached the elder Heine
concerning the infatuation Of his son for
me.
Il was so worried about the whole mat
ter that / became Ill with nervous prostra-
ton and was i'll in bed for sixteen weeks.
During this time the Heine Company failed
to pay me any salary, but the manager
came to me several times and said could
have any money that l needed, and that /
would be well-taken care of.
Says He Vowed to Be True.
ION March Is Arthur Heine returned from
Europe and Immediately called upon me.
He kissed me and expressed his sympathy
with me in my illness. He said he would see
that l was we'll protected, but that he and
his father had had an alteration about me
In which Mr.. Arnold Heine had told him
that he would have to choose between me or
remaining an officer of the corporation. He
promised to be steadfast and true, and he
kissed me goodbye, saying that he might
have to go on to Chicago that afternoon,
but that he would me soon as he re-
turned. have not seen him from that day
to this.
Il have not been paid any of the salary
due me, although the general manager of
the corporation called me once and vol
unteered to give me $500 If would surren-
der all the letters and cablegrams that had
been sent me by Arthur. When 1 refused he
offered 81 600 hDt I again
The suit for s194O and interest is against
Arnold b. Heine and Ben Heine as mem
bers of the Swiss corporal ton.
The answer Is in the form of a general
denial that there was any contract, and a
counter claim is set up that between May
l, 1906, and February l, 1907, advances had
been made to Miss Van Scotch amounting
to 81 $50 90.
To this Miss Van Scotch replies that she
does not know the nature of this claim, I'M
less 1t represents presents made to her by
Arthur Heine during the period she alleges
| they were engaged to be married..
In the breach of promise case, to the
complaint in which Miss Van Scotch swore
April IS last, she declares that Arthur
Heine made her a proffer of marriage in
| this city September 2, 1905, which she ac-
| cepted, and that he renewed this promise
| to marry her August IL and October 10,
| 1906 In this city; at the Hotel Bear, Arbon.
Gall, Switzerland, but that Heine declines
to carry out his promise to marry her.
In this suit Arthur Heine has not been
| served. Process servers traced him to the
| Hotel Chalfonte in Atlantic City, from
| which he departed to Jersey City on a
| Saturday and sailed for Europe. 1t is al
| legged he took a German steamer without
| entering the state of New York. LAWYER
| Beggs will therefore apply to the supreme
court for an order directing service by pub
LEGATION.
The three suits alleging SANDER are based
! upon allegations that the persons accused
| in discussing Miss Van Scoten's relations
| with the young millionaire, made remarks
| of a derogatory nature.
| Oscar Edison, through Cohn & Levy, has
| entered notice of appearance, as has
| William Dreyfoos.
| Rudolph Reinhart, alleged to have circu-
] lated a statement of a similar character.
! has made a general denial through Rush
| more, BiSbee, Rogers & Stern.