The Birmingham age-herald. [volume] (Birmingham, Ala.) 1902-1950, 1907-01-24
RECORD OF THE COURTS

In the circuit court yesterday, after all
the evidence was in, the attorneys in
the case of C. C. Mardis VS.. Birmingham
Railway Light and Power company, held
a consultation, which resulted in a con-
sent judgment for the plaintiff for $4,000.
The plaintiff alleges having received per-
sonal injuries by falling off car at
Woodlawn.
Clara White VS.. Birmingham Railway
Light and Power company was on trial
and had not concluded when court ad-
journed.
Circuit Court Docket.
The following docket is set for trial
in the circuit court today: j. w. Parkes
VS.. Southern Bell Telephone and Tele-
graph company, damages; Matte Finch
vs. Birmingham Railway Light and Pow
er company damages; Bob Henderson VS..
ST. Louis and San Francisco Railroad
company, appeal; Carl Roegner VS.. City
of Avondale ct al, damages; Carl Roeg
ner VS.. w. R. starbuck ct al. damages.
In the first division of the city court
yesterday the case of Susie p. Melton VS..
Birmingham Railway. Light and Power
company was on trial and has not con-
ciuded. Plaintiff claims damages for al
legged personal injuries.
City Court.
The following docket is set for trial in
the first division of the city court to-
day:
A. w. Mock VS.. Western Union Tele-
graph company, damages; William Tay-
lor vs. n. A. Walker, damages; John C.
ca
Railroad company, damages; Phillips
Cary Manufacturing company VS.. Frede-
rick Moesser & Co, ct ais, assumpsit.
H.. In the second division of the city court
he returned hon lowing cases We're dis
tosether win prosecutions: Common
is1and hafo,e re company VS.. j. G..
Announcem ~ e. Lum VS.. Norman
Smith VS.. George w.
cLeod VS.. b. e. Lom-
baiGU. CTIP vs.. Southern Mutual
Aid association.
The chancery docket will be called in
this division today.
hancery Court.
The following suits were filed in the
chanc . court yesterday:
4. IT, Mattocks VS.. c. C. Hoy ct al.
Complainant seeks to foreclose a mort
gage.
H. l.. Badham VS.. Corinne Eborn ct al.
The complainant alleges that in June, 1903,
he sold by his agent Ramseur, several
lots in Rosedale, Jefferson county, for
$3.50 per lot, and that in preparing the
deed to said lots, the lots numbered 7, 8
and were included by mistake; that
N. S. D. Lunsford and Corinne Eborn
were the purchasers of the lots and they
In turn sold them to Kinds Peevey, II.
II. Goldstein and w. II. Ferguson; that
when complainant discovered his mistake
he notified the respondents and offered
to pay the money which had been paid
for said lots I, and Q, but respondents
refused to sell. Complainant alleges that
the lots specified were not intended to
be sold and are worth 5000 each and were
Included in the deed by mistake
Criminal Court
In the criminal court yesterday Joseph
Holmes charged with assault with in
tent to murder. was found guilty of as
sault with a weapon and fined $500.
Randall Jordan, charged with grand lar
ceny, was on trial. 1t is alleged that the
defendant took whisky from a certain
saloon in town and sold 1t to others.
During the trial there was so much talk
of whisky that nearly every one present
felt like shaking his thirst at the fountain
of Joy
Criminal Court Docket.
The following docket is set for trial
In the first division of the criminal court
today:
william f. Corning. keeping gaming ia
BILE: ], j. Emerson. embezzlement: James
O'Hear, receiving stolen property Oscar
Linn, assault with intent to murder; Mary
Hall, forgery; Remus Wilson, assault and
battery; Tom Dawkins. changing name;
Aileen Bryant, assault with intent to MUIR
der.