New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1907-04-07
NEW BILL In EDDY SUIT
disks That Trustees Be added to
Defendants.

Concord, n H. April ga supplemental bill in
equity was filed IN the Merrimack County Court TO-
dav bv the original plaintiffs or next friends IN
The suft for an accounting of Mrs. Mary Baker e..
Tcddvs property The bill is the answer Of the
plaintiffs TO the motion made by the defendants last
Tu,ndav that the three trustees. Archibald NC
Iellan Of Boston: Henry NJ. Baker, OF Bow ana
Josiah f. Fernald Of this city, be substituted for
the next friends" and be empowered to prosecute
the suits against the defendants in the case, who
are all prominent members Of the Christian Science
Church -
IN the list Of defendants on the ground that the
trustees are working for the same ends as the
original defendants. that is, that they are uhuuly
influencing Mrs. Eddy and managing her property
TO their ends
The supplemental bill also asks that the deed OF
trust be vacated on the ground that Mrs. EDDY
was not comuetent to execute it and was a device
contriyed by the defendants tc defeat the purpose
Of the original suit
The bill, barring legal phraseology' Is as toIlo"s'
The petition Of Mary Baker Glover Eddy, who
Baker Glover, George W. Baker, FRED w. bdhSi
and end E6 SqsaS Fsrl6% irving 4 Tonso Ira q
Knapp William B. Johnson Stegheh, a t5sTnIagn
Herring Lewis Wis md stF os5b HeP Peyrnad
Al me ptaint1ffs say that on the first day OF
March 1907 there was exhibited in this court their
original e OF ee eRaept Baer MeLean and Fer
nald which bill stated the groHnqS ot dv served
1pon said attendants and is pending at this
The plaintiffs further say that after the fling
of said bill TO wit. the sixth day of March, the
Sefendapts induced Mary b. G. Eddy. she being
IN the condition Of mind and body dSd aege4 IN
ring all her estate, real and personal 70 liEnIy ~
Baker, o Bow, n H Archibald Mcclellan e!oncor 4i
\ ii and that thereupon, in pursuance OF sal"
deed Baker Mcclellan ana Fernald proceeded !"
take possession of all the real ana peIso4Ai
conveyed by said deed. ~,
Ieilan and Fernald the agents and attorneys
subject to the control Of said original defendantS
and part OF the combination 10 surround ana
connection with other defendants. to take charge
Of her property and her business and 10 manage
and that they have completely succeeded in ef.
fectng the purpose OF their combination, and that
there is abundant reason to believe that they ana
their associates have wroD6fully misappToprlated
or unlawfUlly diverted large sums OF money and
larger amounts OF property OF Mary D. @. EDDY, as
set forth in said original bill in equity;
Ma->h the said Mary r. G. Eddy was not com
petent execute. by OF her condition. set
same is device OF all the defendants, contrived
and carried out for the purpose OF enabling the de-
purposes OF the aforesaid combination and TO pre-
vent the appointment Of receiver In said original
suit and TO defeat the regular course Of said suit
Wherefore the plaintiffs pray;
!. That this supplemental bill may be made a
defendants Baker, Mcclellan and Fernald be re-
and
.. That the defendants Baker Mcclellan and
receiver or receivers when appointed by the court
under the prayer for relief In the original bill. all
t4IS property OF TIE sdld mary - u f-uGy; taken
visions OF the deed signed March s. 1907, and for
sucn further relief as 20 the court may seem requ-
GEORGE w GLOVER