Albuquerque morning journal. [volume] (Albuquerque, N.M.) 1903-1926, 1907-07-14

speak up. NJ Dewey take ina
t~osihplek out u your mouth ana q
up
All right" said Dewey. siraighten
ing himself IN the chair. but I woali
Ike 10 AVE . drink % water"
II vas given - him b. one Of "a.
Haywood counsel
IN T. L Niece. against ah0m
warrant FOR perjury va isgued this az
f4fnsnn p Q wealthy resident ~ Wal
iaee Al one time he conducted
hospital there ln mir festlmJny ~.
fhe defense he sWore thar Orchard wa
lN wallace iu August HHd JUS 8f 1895
H wac ~ tlls time that the stat.
claims and Orchard himself saya. hf
aaa tn Denver planning the HradleI
murder One ~ the witnesses fodat
WoTe that Orchard vas ar his hotel Ia
Denver IN July or August, 1905 Ac-
Zee Ma@ ALEC one of the Witnesses via
HHore that Orchard fnaa 80 Mullen IN
b day ~ the explosion A. The Bunker
1911 ana Sullivan concentration
Ten Witnesses IN rebuitai were exc
amind today Most ~ them were
called 10 slspfoFs statements a. 20 or
rharaH movements iu north Idaho
49, 10 the disposal ~ hfa Interests .a
be- Hfrclaes mine. Ono ~ The moef
Interesting ~ the Hitnesnes WAS Aa-
aust PauIagn. Nh0 VAS at one time 70
poor miner 10 the toeur d'Alenes an 2
= partner ~ Orchard IN the Hercui =
mine He reuined Die interest in the
Hercules Tor nye years. untii the mine
hreHmr one ~ the best pr0UeTfies iu
ihe country and f. now wealthy.
Orchard awOre that Do planned q.
kidmap Pauisoua children and nufprt
. ransom 81 10000. Thfn coup dld
not come on PauiaOn was JAILED
a.E.- H.. b.. 49,. DO
disposed ~ his Interest ln the mine.
some lime before he len the stare
Fauta0u viii be- recalled later
Counsel Tor The state expect 10 nn-
ish the Febuifai rs THesdaF evening"
~ Wednesday al the latest
~ was expected that a powder es-
pert would BE- put on the stand This
morning b9 the defcu.e % testify re-
rardlug the Bradley explosion 81
san FranciHcO and consequently tn
prosecution was not prepared with
Witnesses in rebuttal when the defense
announced that ~ rested BE- case.
Witnesses soon began 10 stragR.a
lu, however. nnd John q Rice wac
recalled He testified that 10 Novem
ber 1905. Orchard dfd not wear d I
muustache This ronfraflcted the W.T.
ness for The defense who suoFe that
he heard Orchard make threa
against E~teuucuherg. describing Orch. 4
ara AZ o. man with a large m0usfachs i
In contradiction ~ the old soldier
John - Elliott who said that ne
heard orchard make threats agalusft
Steunenbcrg The state Introduced stg
vral railway officials. Whu ur0ducee
records shoginF thnf fhe trains 90
y hich Elliott said be and Orchard
travelled. did % make The ronmectlons
which Elliott described aa q part 81
Inc journey.
u Mozsr rr,urt.f.f ~ tt. E.4F-f
Block rOominr house in Denver. tes'i
ned that Orchard. under the name
~ Dempsey" stopped with him for
Two weeks late ln July OF August.
1905
Br. McGre. a witness for tire De-
Tense. testified several weeks ago that
saw Orchard in Occur dAiene a.
That time, on examination Mo-
2fr said he Kept NJ record Of ru.ffsi
and did not remember the nance ~
ms other transient guests in the STUNT
81 1905
Dan Gainey. ~ Waita WaIa. Who'll,
lost beih feet DOB the Independence %
explosion, testified that Dominica
'ifrn. who had sworn chat Do wasi
playing poker with Orchard pu ApItt
~ 1889 tthe daN ~ the Bunker Hf
auH AHiilVnn ckulasiouI had told him
in a conversation that be had not seen
prr hard since February. 1899. GAlnrg
on crohs-examinntion that he had
rafrespondcd With orchard since bis
ltreat.
Interest IN the rebuttal evidence
was materially qulrkeuod by tn 9
.ailinR Of August Pauison uf WBilncs q
Idaho. one ~ the owners Df the Nor
uirs mine. ln which Orchard once g
held nne-riKtecuih interest.
Pauiapu said That De- could not re- q
member Che nNHci date when or
nard sold his Interest. but aftsr &
.AHNH In HH. H.m.Hm 30 HNs. g. I'D.
further 10 dp with the prop
.If1 q
The state claims that Orchard sofia j
be Interest a FfHr ur sp before fuH q
fpublf. in that part uf che state be- D
The deed hy which Orchard p
Dan Gardiner Waa admitted 30 owe
o over the protest Of the defense q
t bore the date of March q 1855. q
pu The opening 81 the afternoon f~s. q
Judge Wood announced That no
you'd admit evidence offered by thr (
tate Doc rebuttal ~ show Il conviction !
if john NJ. bArtll Tor mhualauFhtnr
oNril b. the editor of the Miner
iHgHxinr aud vas 81 witness fef tHe
81 HaUicy read inc papemsn the :
b NriI case" lie WAS charged vita
lr klllIug of Daniel FslFcy aud upon
convicted of mnusaughtef in coo
rruud drgree was sentenced 60 one
cor aud six months Boz the Ueuiirn-
Iufl 2
no contradict the statement of mig g
Nii basis fu The defense that he T
iuukef 1854 and sullivan mine eEnIo- :
thH state called 81 - Hale. mas q
90 mechanic at the Idaho Mn and A.,
mHlliuE company Hale aIll hr Wa d.
b. Gem the Gas uf the explosion lud 4.
Hut hN eaW uuiF two other men iu 4
.HLn HN.H I... H#U... H... ..M#M ...