The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-06-19

, everyone who has no visible means of support or who is not engaged in some | legitimate business.
 Judge Dan A. Greene overruled demur-
 rers to the indictment and upon the testl-
 mony of the witness acquitted the defen-
 dant Assistant Solicitor John P. Abbott was a character witness for the defen- dant
 Circuit Court Docket. | The following docket is set in Judge | Lanes division of the circuit court today: The Lacrosse Mercantile company vs. | William Lindsay ct al., appeal; w. j..
 Andrews vs. J. F. Graham, assumpsit;
 Sam Locasio vs. Travellers Protective as-
 sociation, assumpst; Ernest Mcdonald
 vs Mike Kruilly, appeal Wesley Short
 vs. Minnie l.. Edwards ct al, damages.
 The following docket is set in Judge
 Colemans division of the circuit court
 today:
 Mrs. s. E. Cox, adminstratrix, vs Bir-
 mingham Railway, Light and Power com
 pany, damages; Louis Perolo vs. Ten
 nessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company
 damages; Milner & Kettig company vs
 JOIn M. bIdultJ tl dl., dSSulilpSlL, OluutJ
 Hart vs. Amelia Stodemeyer, ejectment;
 c. M. Freeman vs. H. W. Phillips ct all,
 damages
 First City Docket. The following docket Is set in the first division of the city court today: l J. R. Ellison vs. B. B. Hood, damages: 1 Prowell Hardware company vs. Inez B.. , Jones, assumpsit; J. ". Hawkins vs. A. J. Riley, damages; Savers Mercantile Agency company vs. Joe and Lee Slaugh- ter, appeal; c. J. Walker vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company; c.
 L. Browning vs. Fies & Sons, damages.
 Second Division Docket.
 The following docket is set in the sec
 ond division of the city court today:
 Kingston Land company vs Southern Railway company certiorari; w. H. Holz- endorf vs. St. Louis Jewelry company
 certiorari; T. c. Hartwell & Sons vs. Red
 Star Coal company, appeal A. Cunning
 ham vs. M. Clifford ct al., certiorari; George McCann ct al., pro ami, vs. Su-
 preme Lodge, Knights of Honor, assump- sit; Barbour Plumbing and Electric com pany vs. A. s. Owen, appeal; Tom Day vs. Hotel Hlllman ct al., appeal Charlie
 Scott vs. St. Louis and San Francisco
 Railroad company, appeal; Warren Harri- son vs. St Louis and San Francisco Rail- road company, appeal; T. P. West ct al. vs. w. H. Robertson, appeal; Drennen x Co. vs. P. II. Hambright, garnishment; Thomas w. O'Byrne vs. J. s. Lewis, cer- tiorari; R. c. Thompson vs. J. w. Harris, garnishment; John R. Gaudin vs. w. w. Downs, appeal.
 chancery Docket. The following docket is set in the chan cery court today:
 Peter Williams ct al. vs. E. H. Mon 1 crief ct al; Hattie Trimble vs Bailey Trimble; William H. Kendrick ct al. vs. 1 Alabama Consolidated Coal and Iron com , pany; George Thomas vs. J. w. Lindsey | Hume F. Jones vs. E. H. ONeal; Bayless | Bradford vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron and i Railroad company; Ike Floyd vs. Tennes- see Coal, Iron and Railroad company i Harry Rensford, Jr., vs. Mrs Ellen Rev l ct al b. H. Drennen vs. Irene Nixon l ct al.; Daniel Stewart, pro ami, vs. John { Stewart ct al.
 Criminal Docket. 1 The following docket is set in the first i division of the criminal court today: Eva Graves, grand larceny; Sam John son, burglary and grand larceny; Alex | Lee grand larceny: George Miles, lar 1 ceny; Willie Marshall and Eddie Miller, | grand larceny; Charlie James, assault with intent to murder.