Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1907-05-06
SHEETS CASE TO
Open THE Term
Will be One of the First to be
Argued in Supreme
Court.
MAY TERM STARTS MONDAY,
Twenty three Cases Are on the Cal
endar--Regnlar Settings End
On May ~.

Tho May term OF the supreme court
win open on next Monday morning at
! 10 o'clock. and the calendar has been
| printed and copies are now being dis
! tributed among the attorneys. There
| are 20 cases on the calendar, and the
| regular settings end on May ~. on
the opening day OF the term the argu-
mehts in the case of the state against
! chief Of Police George A. Sheets viii
be heard, 1t being the third case on
the calendar. Sheets was charged with
| criminal conspiracy in connection with
the robbery OIL me McWhirter brothers
IN this city last September, but the in
formation against him was quashed by
Judge Armstrong OF the district court
on the ground that 1t charged the conf
mission OF a felony and not consplta-
cy, which is the misdemeanor of con-
spiTacy tor which he was given a pre-
limnary hearing and bound over to the
district court. The state appealed
from the decision of Judge Armstrong
IN guashing the information and it is
upon THAI point that this case will be
heard before the supreme court.
The calendar in full follows;
May Estate OF Utah respondent,
VS.. win Moore. appellant; the state OF
Utah, respondent. VS.. George Peterson,
appellant; the state Of Utah, appellant,
VS. George sheets, respondent
May 14--Iars Christensen. appellant,
vs.. Oscar Beebe. sheriff of Emery coun-
~ respondent; William Geddes ct al.
appellants, VS.. North Ogden Irrigation
company, ct al. respondents; IL. a.
Nelson, appellant. W. keith-O' Brien
company. 81 al, respondents.
May l5-Margaret r. Cutler respond
nt rhnT1lg lTDVHngk Annall1nf
X, G.. jolly, administrators. respondent.
vs.. Thomas Haycock, appellant; Lars
q. Peterson, respondent. VS.. Bullion
Ercl & Champion Mining company, APP
pelIant.
,.,,, l6--Walter Bryant, respondent.
ys. Mark Kunkel ct al, appellant; j.
r. Roberts, appellant. VS.. Mark p.
Braffet. respondent; Mrs. 5. u, riddle
ct al. respondents, US. b, b. Quinn, APP
Dellaut.
NAY II,
c. D. Rogers and Mrs j. Rogers.
appellants. VS.. Rio Grande Western
Railway company, respondent; In~re
application of Don c. Fuilmer and
others real property owners of the
town of Mapleton. to restrict the cor
porate limits of said town; NJ. n.
Everett. respondent, VS. r. II. Jones,
appellant,
H. l.. Hunt, respondent. VS.. Charles
II. Moore. appellant; a. r Chrlsten-
sen. respondent, VS.. the Colorado In
vestment Loan company, appellant;
Asenath Chadwick, appellant, VS.. ].
II. Arnold, ct al. respondents.
MAY q.
In re estate of William G. owen. de-
ceased, c. W. johnson. respondent, VS..
5. p. Armstrong, administrator of the
estate, appellant; George Joens, re-
spondent. VS.. Bonanza Mining and
Milling companw ct al, appallents [.
y. L.. Furniture and Carpet INSTALL
ment House appellant, VS.. Louis Be-
rets, ct al, respondents
MAY %.
Joseph S. Richards, appellant, vs..
Joseph Il. Smith, trustee in trust of
the Church of Jesus Christ Of Latter
day Saints, respondent; Mabel Rich
ards, by her guardian ad Item. re-
spondent, vs.. ogden Steam Laundry
company, appellant.