Bisbee daily review., 1907-04-25
CALENDAR CALL IN DISTRICT
 COURT
Many Cases Are Set for Hear ing and Term Promises to Be Busy One Both for Law yerS and Court.
lSnecial to ReyieM.l

topSCld1 tU RcNitA.J
 TOMBSTONE, April 24.-A call of the calendar was made in the district court this morning. most of the mem bers of the bar being present and a number of cases were set. The fol lowing is a list of the cases set and disposed of up to the noon adjourn ment
 Payne & Schleiper vs. Lucy Seabury, debt; set for May Is.
 NJ. c. Lewis ys. John F. Edgar, dismissed for want of prosecution.
 F. S. Douglas vs. B. NJ. Eggs, dis missed for want of prosecution.
 Fred H. Berry vs. Belle Berry, di- vorce, dismissed on motion of plain tiff.
 N. E. Warnekros vs. J. N. Keasley, injunction; set for June 26.
 Musgrave ys. Johnson, appeal frc.n justice court; dismissed for want Of prosecution.
 Sarah Daley vs. Calumet and Ari- zona Mining Company, damages; dis missed for want of prosecution.
 Taylor vs. Brooks, appeal from just ice court: dismissed for want of prose cution.
 Walker vs. Murphy. appeal from the justice court: remanded to the justice court.
 Branderson vs. Branderson, dismiss ed at plaintiffs cost.
 Jurado vs. Evans, injunction; set for May r..
 Sax vs. w. B. Kelly ct al. damages; jury demanded by plaintiff.
 Blum vs. Barrett, quiet title; jury demanded by plaintiff.
 Schwalbe ys. Wolfe Manufacturing Co, quiet title; dismissed for want of prosecution.
 Anita Leyvas vs. Ramon Leyvas, di- vorce; set for May 2.
 E. J. Mitchell vs. R. S. Hunt ct al, damages; jury demanded by plaintiff. E.. J. Hands ct al vs John Sullivan ct al., to quiet title, and six other cases of a similar nature involving the ques- tion of title to claims in the Cali fornia mining district, were set for trial on May Is. .Es; Onitineros vs. Ontineros, dismissed on plaintiffs motion. Schwamm vs. Dispatch Publishing plaintiff.
 Elmer c. Hall vs. Mary A. Hall, di' vorce; submitted on proof for judg' ment.
 Gaines vs. Norton & Stewart, back taxes: set for June 27. Moline Jewelry Co vs. L. Constance, appeal from justice court; jury de manded by plaintiff. J. A. Miller ct al. vs. H. s. Hunt, in junction; dismissed on motion of plaintiff
 A. J. Johnson vs. Sam Dyson, appeal from justice court; jury demanded by defendant.
 F.. J. Flanigan vs. Chas. F. Wren ct al, deht: set for May 15. Alice Perry vs. Aaron Perry, di- vorce: dismissed by consent of both parties ...-...-....-.--.-.t William Decheraw vs. H. P Clifford quiet title; set for June 27.
 John F. Flanigan vs. Denn-Arizona Mining Co. damages; jury demanded by plaintiff. Bruce Wyatt, administrator, vs. Bis, bee Improvement Co, damages; jury demanded by plaintiff. Muheim vs. W. H. Wilson ct al., recovery of real estate; dismissed on motion of plaintiff. Mcdonald vs. Cochise County, debt; dismissed on motion of plaintiff, Appeal case Of the probate court in the estate of F. J. Delahanty set for May IS.
 Klein-Norton Co. vs. A. A. Caste. nada, debt; jury demanded by plain tiff.
 Christy vs. Rock, set for May 15. BrazieI ct al ys. Bisbee-Naco Wa. ter Co.,. damages; jury demanded by plaintiff. Payla vs. North Bisbee Dev. Co, in junction: continued for the term by stimulation. The trial jury will not be called until May 27, the court being called to Phoenix the second week in May to attend a session of the supreme court In the case of Cardwell vs. Swatling the demurrer was overruled and nIe case set for trial on June 26.