Bisbee daily review., 1907-08-29
ANGRY WORDS
 SPOKEN IN COURT
(cOntinued from First Page.)
bringing out the whole truth

bringing out the whole truth" T did not have the papers you ac- cuse me of Paving withheld,s replied Delmas, until the morning after you challenged me fo produce them. Who eyer says to the contrary Is guilty of uttering a deliberate falseho0d."
 When we recall snerwin to the stand, Heney answered. we will show l when they were delivered to you" And if you show they came into my hands before the time 1 stated" :" Delmas replied. q will give you per- mission to apply to me all the scurru- ius biliingssate you have just been unloading"
 Now, said Judge Lawlor, T have heard enough. I propose now te -rlas without listening to any furtI un- necessary discussion.,'
 The ruling sustained the Delmas ob- jection. Handing scott voucher for $1200, dated July 6. l906, and mark ed flor Secial expenses incurred San Francisco" charge to reserve for contingent liabilities" signed by E. ]. Zimmer as auditor, and approved by H. L. Scott. president, and receipted by T. s. Halsey. Heney asked:
 Now do you know what ti-e s1z0O was for?"
 T did not know at tue time it was presented to me for approval" an- swered Scott, but told Thinner that that sort of thing would have to stop, and vouchers must be sigued by the persons who got the money, and that they must be persons publicly employ ed by the company. I said I d!dn | want to be harsh, but these allowan- ces would have to be cut down or stopped entirely within three or four months"
 Scott identified tbe approval sig nature on four other later vouchers for s600 each, all paid to Ruef through Halsey. He explained they were thus cut down by his order, and were the last payments made to Ruef At the time you approved these vouchers. did you know of any ser vice that had oeen performed by Ruef for the company" Heney a2ked.
 Scott answered.: sNo, sir"
 He testified that Glass salary at the time he (Scott) took charge as pres ldent was s15,O00 q year Delmas handed Scott a teled-a.n which Fur
  eral office from Minneapolis to Hal sey, when the latter was sup posed to be in the state of Was-.-ng ton. Scott said he never had seen such a telegram, whereupon Heney took it from his hand and examined it. This caused another hot exchange of personalities, after which the tele- gram was introduced in evidence.
 At the afternoon session Heney placed upon the stand former mem bers of the Oakland city council, and by their testimony proved Glass as general manager, with supervision oy- CT the efforts made by Halsey to de feat the application of the Home Tel ephone Company for rival fran chise iE the traps bay city. Tie point of thte testimony, which lhe Eproeecusion sets ecea; store by Is the likelihood it creates of the exercise of similar supervision by Glass with reference to San Francisco supervi- sors and eouncilmen. Benjamin [. | Fendelton and Eugeac ThGrston tes- tified to being guests by invitation of 1 Halsey to luncheon at the Bohe milan club on September 22, 1905. State Senator Lukens ani both Glass and Halsey were present. Lukens at the time was in the employ of the Pacific States Telerhone Company as a law yer "The bulk of the conversation, ' said Thurston. which dealt almost en- tirely with opposition to the move ment in Oakland, was carried on by Senator Lukens and Attorney Espey.