The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-11-20
RECORD OF THE COURTS

IG6 6O011 OE 111 wv Ae ! v All the courts were engaged in reg ular work yesterday, no case of any public interest being on trial.
 Circuit Court.
 In the circuit court before Judge John H. Miller a judgment for $1250 was rem dered for the plaintiff in the case of George Manning, pro ami vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company.
 In the case of George Moss vs. St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad com pany, tried on Monday before Judge Lane in the circuit court, verdict for s25O was awarded the plaintiff.
 In the case of Emanuel Lomand vs. Southern Railway company, the jury found a verdict for the defendant.
 In Judge Lanes division of the cir cult court yesterday the case of J. J. Ferry administrator of Hattie Frery, vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company is on trial.
 The following docket is set for trial today before Judge Lane:
 Clara Thurmond vs. J. T. Harwell, appeal by defendant; Snug 1sbell vs Ten nessee Coal Iron and Railroad company, damages Couch and Dalby vs. J. M. and Laura B. Lowry, ct al, assumpsit; Rob- ert Easterling vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; Mary Jackson vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company. damages.
 Judge Miller is up with his docket in the circuit court.
 int f6n E. Carr was tried without jury and judgment reserved.
 The following docket is set before Judge Miller in the circuit court today;
 The Raleigh Distilling company ys. F. Kraft, ct al., assumpsit; Edwin Scheile , compahv vs. F. Kraft, ct al, assumpsit; Jim McKitcheon vs. St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad company, damages; Thomas Colston vs. Louisville and Nash vile Railroad company, damages; Will Woods vs Hill Bros. damages.
 City Court.
 In the first division of the city court vesterday the following cases were dis missed: w. H. Priegel vs. Highland Mar ket company; John M. Dubose vs. Re- public Iron and Steel company D. IL. Hickman vs. o. ". Freeman, ct als.; Oliver E. Swarts vs. A. c. Semmonds.
 The case of w. E. Hansberger vs. H. B Abernathy was abated on suggested death of plaintiff.
 The following docket is set in the hrst division of the city court today:
 Goldsten Bros. ct al. vs. B. A. Alper, garnishment on summons; Stewart Loan and Investment company vs. F. w. Youngblood ct al., appeal by defendant' William W. Montgomery pro ami vs. A. l.. Hockett, ejectment; H. White vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, ejectment; H. K. White Vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, ejectmeut; Jefferson county ct al. vs. Will Turner, certiorari by de- fendant: A. B. Dabb vs. V. G. finish ct ai., rarnishment on summons: Gray & Dudley Hardware company vs. Mrs. S. A, Odacre, ,ss,lnpsit: Continental Manufacturing company ct al vs. Southern Railway company certiorari by defendant; Mrs. Laura. C. Ensley vs. Mrs. l.. Matthews, assunlpsit Birmingham Electrical com many vs. H. IT. Goldstein, assumpsit; Dave Kicks vs. Charley Hicks ct all, ap- neal by defendant; John Munson vs. Ned Jambst. appeal by defendant: J. T. Will Hams ys Morgan Milton, appeal by de- fendant. In the second division of the city court the concluding arguments of counsel are heinz made in the case of w. J. Phillips vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Pow CT company.
 The following docket is set in the sec- ond division of the city court today:
 will Hunt vs. Western Union Telegraph company, damages; Annie Jackson vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; W. P. Mewbourne vs. xUbite-Flakeslee Manufacturing company, damages; Samuel T. Keith. administrator. vs. Alabama Great Southern Railroad company, damages; James Griffin vs. Bir- mineham Railway, Light and Power com- pany, damages; B. W. Rail vs. North Bir- ,ningham. damages; Russell Chastan pro an,i vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages.
 In the third division of the city court xasterdsv the case of Frank Blanchard nro ami vs. Birmingham Railway. Light