New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1907-02-08

several months after 1901? Al did not see him
for long time. for several months.
oLThat Is what hat, am asking your Al did
oMWers you taken iii at any tine. when Won had
10 go to a hospital? Av;Yes. sir.
al am asking for dateY Am 1903. in the
Q-ls03? Ayes.
WENT TO SCHOOL IN 1902.
o-Whegno os did YOU go to schOOlr Al went to
Q.--l9O2? At was about the end Of October or
the beginning OF november; SOM where along in
odN Ss9 sa Set N b the ia n 1901 when
school how often did you see him. am where?
Al think ! saw him one day in town think
back from Europe. I think he said h. had been
in BuT Te az the time that had not seen him.
send you and your brother school upon his stat
ing that you We're too young TO be the stage was
.5 .9U fid you Come to go to school late you
Q.L2id you state TO Mr.. Thaw at any time how
f99ai AID had come to go to school in New 1er'ey' A
8-Ki Gyi state that Al told him all about It
y Was that t you told him? Al told him that Mr.:
and made some arrangements for me to 20 to
sino9 han sfes Was son tine in January told
and was sent there.
o- While you you were at school there you say you
o-Iiad to have an operation performedP A
om w 1, was that time that you taken mf
Odd you see Mr.. Thaw at that time? Al
Wien Has sick d& E N b. see hm' Al saw him
&C. 9I 5 long had It been before that-how much
time had elapsed between the last time you had
seen him and the time he came to see you when you
we're IN IN nedr Al DO not know exactly; it might
Ss W gi9 you please describe to the jury what Mr.
he doctors o him = th ansfs Woa 6Sf have to Be
see what was the matter and that something had had
happened he . They did not tell me what it They
He did not say word to me. because was too
beside the bed a GUIi nSd Iak ana he knet down
a. me for moment and then went out. He was
Q.Never uttering word? Ale never said
,,Q--Dd he indicate to you in any way that he
ola qz hpt WISH you TO speak? A.-No; think they
very SeI9 lin Ill mat was not allowed to talk was
we're Tut nn ths f5t I SAW before yS9
NJ Thsw? a. h-6es except the doctor
this hospital did you again see Mr. Thaw? A.
not at the hospital The operation was performed
"a o.Thiis was at the school. then where Mr..
9-The operation was performed there at the
THAw SAW HER AT HOSPITAL
o1,-Then did you see him again at the school7
A3N2 saw him the next eS time at the hospital
the hospital? A.-Yes.
9E How, long after ter this time that he had come
the hospital? A-Oh, / guess it was three weeks.
o-What took place at that interview? Al
f hsEs forgotten I remember was able to talk
Did. Mr.. Thaw on that occasion bring you
ers. and told me he mad made arrangements that
was to be sent TO me several times a week. and
Q-From him? Ayes
en- 6 did Ygog recover from rom that illness suf
Q.-Had any arrangements been made at that time
for you TO travel? Ayes. Mr. Thaw mad arranged
doctor reGo i sea voyage so that could
$50 arrangements were then made that you
should go to Europe. Ayes.
QIAnd those arrangements were made with your
went TO Europe? A.-No; he went on another boat
Pairs e SO- mt HI '1ui0ie' e''' We met IN
.o.-when did you return from Europe yourselfY
Q-Did you bring with you any letter written by
MI Thaw 10 any one Al did.
Mr.. Delmas then tried TO introduce the letter
in evidence. A long argument followed. in
which Mr.. Jerome insisted that the introduction
Of the letter against rules laid down by the
Court Of Appeals. Mr.. Delmas was equally in
sistent that II was not. MI Delmas was unable
to give opinions offhand. but said he
tain he could do later. He withdrew the let
ter until he had cited his authorities. Mr. Del
wanted an early adjournment, as Mrs.
Thaw was tired out, and Mr. Jerome, who had
shown his emotion over the testimony, quickly
acquiesced, saying: Il think it would be
more than fair, If your honor please, the wit
ness IS going through this long ordeal, that she
be given little longer time at the recess hour
and that we might adjourn now
Mr.. Deluas succeeded after recess in getting
the letter in evidence. He began TO quote his
authorities. when Mr.. jerome withdrew his OBJ
lection. After much argument as to the read
ing Of the letter Mr.. Delmas was again sue
cessful. and read it to the jury. It a ram
bling letter, written by Thaw to F. w, Long
fellow, his counsel. of this city. and was fol-
lows:
Mrs. y. insisted sailing New York when her
daughter left. l kept Mrs n in London three
months, cost over 81 600 Mrs Nesbit sails to-
morrow for New York. She thinks kidnapped her
I7al years old daughter Before she lands She viii
know that have always done the best could
TelepRone Mrs N but not IN your name ASK her
II she Mr.. Thaw aboard AS soCn she
swers hang up the phone II. X. I.
On a slip Of paper inclosed was written:
If you can't read this don't worry. Please tele--
phone her incog. and wire me at my expense
Mr.. Delmas followed up his advantage by at
ters. He received a temporary setback. however.
as they apparently did not show the date when
written Mrs Thaw. who had been recalled to
the witness chair, identified them as letters in
the handwriting of the defendant. but beyond
court finally ruled that the letters could be
marked for Identification. but could not be placed
in evidence until date had been established.
Argument continued for nearly hour while
messengers from the defence were sent out 10
get Frederick w. Longfellow. counsel for Thaw