Reporter and farmer. [volume] (Webster, Day County, Dakota [S.D.]) 188?-1946, 1907-07-11
CITCUIT COURT.
The JuIy Term Convened in
Webster Tuesday Morning,
July 9, 1907.


1907. The court officers present were
Judge H. Mccoy, States Attorney
Frank sears, Clerk OF Courts Albert
Smith. Sheriff Phillip Gross and Stem
ographer F. + Granger.
The first bcsiness of the court was
the call of the calendar. The following
cases were marked for trial:
State of South Dakota vs.. 5 II Eye.
land.
State of South Dakota VS. Emmett
Richard.
State of South Dakota VS.. Frank Kur-
kowski
State of South Dakota VS.. Anton
Block.
State of South Dakota vs. Tobias
Huseby.
EWald & Dunton vs.. VIM g Boyd.
Frank Block vs. Frank Lehman
Francis Smith VS. a A. Funk.
Morris Kelloggvs John s Moushaugen
A. S Bryant vs. J. VI Pew.
Isaac @ Despres VS. julius Flagstad.
Frank Bradford VS. G 0. Bailey
Road Skaar VS. Graves d Deuholm
George Harvig VS.. Ed Graves, Charles
Deuholm aud William Denholm.
Emil Odland VS.. Ell Graves, George
! Denholm and William Denholm.
Sedalia Baldwin VS.. H. $ Demmery
Robert Hague VS. Pratt Brothers.
First National Bank of Webster VS.
Farmers Union Elevator company
Fred Nielsen, by his guardian, VS..
George w Beck
Ida 5. Taylor VS. \ Z. Canfeld
c. G. Lasell VS. L. A. Merger and W.
G. Elliott, as Waubay Mercantile COM
pany,
A. S. Bryant VS. First State Bank of
Pierpont
G.. NJ Wales VS.. William Egeland
Robert L. Stayton VS.. Mutual Cash
Guaranty company of Sioux Falls,
Lena Hemmenway VS.. VIM. Althoff
Ella f. Huggett VS. Phillip A. Gross,
as sheriff of Day county.
Anna Rebelski VS.. Phillip A. Gross,
as sheriff of Day county.
Charles Rathbun VS.. the Chicago,
Milwaukee & St Paul Railway com
pany.
l.. H. Maloney VS.. Charles Whitney.
Q. H. Church VS., A S. Bryant.
George Seeley VS.. Eli Fortune.
j. ID. Wood VS.. Phillip A. Gross, as
sheriff of Day county
j. @. Baker VS.. James Hauley.
Peter Brunsyig VS.. Rathbun & Beachy
L. Beachy VS.. Peter Brunsvig.
Tibbs Hptchins & Company vs. p w.
Bowler.
r. O. Connor VS.. +. j. Roberts
Ole w. Akerson VS. H. f. Hansmeier
City of Webster VS. John Doe.
City of Webster VS. G. p. Hanson.
Marie Farmer VS.. United States
Express company.
Ole Ostby VS.. Conrad Kohlhase.
Beder Roseth VS. Sorem j. Halls.
The following cases were settled and
were by the court ordered strick en-
from the calender.
State or South Dakota VS.. Andrew P.
Wagner. The complaining witness in
this seduction case had been married
since the complaint and wished the case
dismissed.
State of South DAKOTA VS.. Frank
Evert. In this case the complaining
witness and defendant had settled mat
tors by getting married.
George NJ Pond VS. Julius Flagstad.
Gilbert Gilbertsan and Abel Helle.
wang VS.. Bertel Bergelson
7. HI Holm VS.. Torgus Strandness, as
Bank of Bristol.
G. A. Wells VS.. Gust Hemple
Upon motions of the various attor-
neys interested the following criminal
cases were continued over the term, the
State of South Dakota being PLAINTIFF in
them ALL
VS.. Peterson; VS. Charles III. Haring
VS.. Beaman Owen; VS.. John Pemrick
VS.. NJ j. Burns; VS.. John Jensmore
VS.. Joseph O'Boyle; VS. Johnny Sauer
VS.. Chauncey Morrey; VS.. Lars Gunder-
son; VS.. Charles Johnson.
The following civil cases went ovel
until the January term of next year:
A. w. Alderman VS.. j. r. Cotton.
Chauncey Morrey VS.. George Sher,
wood.
G. o. Tho, VS.. j. 1. Case company.
Halvor Folkestad VS.. Ole 0. Moland.
Bertha Dahl VS.. +. f. Sletten.
Laduer Brothers VS.. J. E. Gilman and
John Block.
Ross Z. Parks vs. Andrew Valsvig.
Andrew Erickson VS.. Andrew Bolager
Simon Overgard vs.. Anton @. John.
son.
l.. Gross VS.. Gilbert Gilbertson and
Bernt Gilbertson.
L. Gross VS. b. 0. Gilbertsoa, Gilbert
Gilbertson and Arne Gilbertson.
When the case Of the State of South
Dakota VS.. Frank Snaza was called
States Attorney Sears announced to
the court that his brother who was one
Of his bondsmen had appeared in his
ofiioe that morning and deposited 800,
the amount of the bond, and said that