The Roswell daily record. [volume] (Roswell, N.M.) 1903-current, 1907-07-30

Peter G.. JacOby, the defendant in
the above case, has brought suit since
the judgment was rendered against
Jonn Kingston, alleging that King
ston sold him the building with the
understanding that it was not encum-
bered with leases or any other imped-
iments, and asking for $500 damages
for the law suit it brought on him
and for $4,000 damages for delay in
getting possession of his building.
Reid & Hervey are his attorneys.
J. ]. Boyd against ]. S. Tucker, dis
missed on motion and at cost of the
plaintiff.
Elizabeth H Henni1g and others
against Bessie Henning and others,
an order was made modifying GER
tain deed and assessing costs of suit
to plaintiff.
J. A. Coffin gnam against J. D. Rem
der, a suit seeking settlement of par
ties interests in the Roswell Steam
Laundry. Judgment given plaintiff for
a balance of s1S463 and a sum reach
ed by computing s5 per month from
Feb. 1, 1905, to date of judgment, each
party to pay half of the costs.
J. w Gather and NJ. E. Gather VS..
the Dallas Land and Cattle Company,
it is ordered that the transaction of
April 9, 1904, be closed and that the
property in litigation go to plaintiffs,
who must give in return two notes
for $1,000 each, dated Dec. 19, 1906,
and payable III one and two years,
respectively, the property to be prop
erly secured with mortgage. Plaintiff
is to pay all costs.
The Joyce-Pruit Company against
H. G. Shanks, judgment for plaintiff
for s207.OO, interest and costs.
Otto F. Weisenborn against Mary
E. Tan1ehill and James K. Chester,
judgment given against plaintiff, and
plaintiff is to pay costs. This was a
suit to close a trade for 800 acres of
land, which plaintiff claimed he had
arranged to buy through Tallmadge
Brothers. The court held that the Tall
ency of the owners to sell the land,
and that the steps the plaintiff took
with said Tallmadge brothers did not
bind defendants to close the trade.
Fred Bruggeman against H Wildly
Lea. the New Mexico Military Insti-
tute and Willie D. Padgitt, Judgment
against H. Wildly Lea and the Militia
ry Institute by default Continued as
to other defendant
The Joyce-Pruit Company against
z. NJ Weyer and others, ordered that
former judgment of October IA, 1905,
be recalled and new Judgment for
plaintiff for $69216 be entered.
The Pecos Valley & Northeastern
Railway Co. against R. G. Ingersol1,
Jonn Pugh and T o. Holden (three
cases) injunction restraining defend
ant from selling "scalpers" tickets is
made permanent, and judgment ag-
ainst defendant for 81 damages and
costs.
Warren Wagner against Wigs &
Ockerman, dismissed by agreement
at costs of defendant
The Southern Car Mfg. & Supply
Co. against Warren Wagner, judg-
ment for plaintiff for s52939 and the
costs A second suit, same title, judg
ment for plaintiff, for s2,471.03, and
an order appointing K. S. Woodruff
spe cial master to conduct the sale of
well rig of defendant which was or
dered by the court, and to conduct
the settlement of claims, etc. In this
case judgment was given against gar
nishees as follows: Wigs & Ocker
man, S2i9O2; First National Bank of
Roswell, s1S.07; Roswell National
Bank, s4s.31
James P White and others against
the Woodlawn Ditch Co., an order was
made for temporary injunction.
R. F. Barnett against ]. P. Collier,
temporary injunction continued and
defendant required to give $4,000
bond.
The Lawyers Cooperative Publish
ing Co. against H. Irwin Nowlan,
judgment for plaintiff for s158.SO and
an order for the sale of 1S3 law
books to pay Judgment and costs.
Willard w. Edwards against Ina
Witt Edwards, judgment for divorce
and order restoring defendants maid
en- name