New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1907-02-07

URN OAlh hid y NGs
M Thsw aPs his ss T5 t ma s TSaM Sas
ell, and subsequently pass note 70 Nj renenober
Q.@she called FOR a pencil from whom? A
CT being handed her some time At after rt that
31Mss folasdd3 YES was folded {Bs3 paper
make any Temark? Al didn't hear any remark
Of Mr. ThaW at that time as Affected by this piece
Of paper. or the reception Of It?
The District Attorney objected. He con-
tended that the phrase as affected by this piece
of paper" should not be part Of the question
Mr.. Demas replied:
If your honor, please upon the reception OF
the paper OF course, it is impossible for me to
prove by this witness the contents Of that pa
per I am informed that it is in the possession
of the learned District Attorney. If I am cor
rectly informed I shall call for its production
The court sustained the objection and MT
Delmas continued: Il was not aware that
could prove the contents in this way. II am
correctly informed 1 now call for the production
of that paper if it is in the possession of the
learned District Attorneys office"
Mr.. Jerome and Mr.. Caravan sat perfectly still
without turning around making reply. MI
Hartrdge was heard to say in an undertone 10
Mr.. Demas: Make him answer"
There was still no response. and Mr. Dernas
demanded the note for the third time. Upon
receiving no reply from Mr.. Jerome, Mr.. Delmas
said:
taEe that ' the seocs Of the learned District
Attorney is due not TO dscourtesy, but 70 proper
shan therefore have to prove the contents Of that
he TIesS b NO" "oad any, cb8nee in the appear
gUp or NJ ThaIE 4 -
not remember having LICKED at him ndo at "a all him,
this slip Of paper was handed TO him by Mrs
o|And YOU paid no attention? A-N No. SIT t,,-,,
Odd You go directly from the eos cafe v M IeroI
S o nG 1901 IS w s' wen {S HT iU directly
Odd you together? My memory RTo Is very
61k T%ised ahead vim NJ Th aIEiv.a at the
Madison Square Garden together
That ended the direct examination and Mr..
Jerome cross-examined:
Q-Mr Mccalqb how long have you known t the
him in San Francisco about year prier h I'm
Paris years aEo. and then l had just the
and during tGat time you met a number OF
DID YOU have any commercial relations with
Or business relations Of any kind or nature?
Q.-And you saw him number of times the
week before he killed stanford White. Can you
saw him several fines
Q-And did You know tho defendant prior TO his
marriage to his present wife the former Miss Mes
bit? Al knew him in Paris that Is all. / mean
Owns he married when you knew him in San
Q.-And did you know Mrs. Thaw before she was
married? Al did not.
Q.-You first became acquainted with her the
wife Of the defendant? A.-As Mrs Harry X.
Q-And you dined a number Of times with them
At the Lorraine? Any recollection is that
Q.EIWbo VAS present at that time? A-Do you
QIIf you please. YES. A MI. s,rohm. I re-
Q.-This Mr, stroGm and Miss Mackenzie and
the defendant and his wife. A.-And the defendant
Q.-Anybody else? A--Not that recollect
da and his w6 aa Kiss Mae S5a t Was d Of
me me party! That was the only time dined
Q, Now, his killing OF Stanford white took
pace on Monday night. didn't #? A.-Monday.
as4 4n Had 5h2t pFsyl9us saday where had YOU
had not "a" y di ainea a. Mrs Ihaws house? A
Q-And who was there2 At was not Mr. T3eaIa
Q,mWhatt was the sentleman's manner As that
QN TT 1 is no imBroprsty n dining ut sherrys
Ar harvey OF San Francisco
HIS MOVEMENTS on JUNE %.
81 understand that this night that you ainoa at
you were TO dine at sherry's and a change was
"Sae N5 ~ 6ut wi" Vas eHP HAN t sa5 to yoq,
d did dine at sherrys When Nj Thaw extended
lie didn't ask me to dine lie said Meet us
at Sherry.s at half after T."
Gmhief9re going to Sherrys did you go to the
sherry and then wen, to Martins ALNo, MIR 4t
beaIe ana drove from certain place up Firth
there and 60 down to his club-to club at which
di- aS 10 uIne w nfn we got out he had parting
T Tha5. Win me !" the cafe there Presently Mr.
Q-Neyer mind. Did Thaw and his wife foin YOU
ana 5eale there and YOU went together from there
A.-No; Mrs. Thaw was outside In an electric cab
Q-Then. a result OF tho conversation there
You all went down TO Martins to dinner? A As a
result Of his invitation
.QgThat was the conversation? Al am trying
81 don't want IT. Al would Ike to tell you
II here was some talk in sherry's and after that
tins. Is that correct? A-Yes. sir 60 W
- -TT99SW Martins dining room has one entrance
from tlrth avenue, has Il not? A-Yee
Mr.. jerome had the witness describe Martins
as closely as possible. McCaIeb said he sat fac
Ing 10Th street. at dinner. Beale sat opposite.
Mrs Thaw on his left and Thaw on his right.
Mr.. Jerome cross-examined as to the witnesses
ability to tell insanity or irratonaIity Then he
asked him If he had ever borrowed money or
tried TO borrow any from Thaw. both answers
being denials McCaleb said his last occupation
was secretary Of an association for the fmproye-
ment Of San Francisco His salary. at first. was
$50 month, later cut and he finally re-
signed on account Of IN health He has written
two books. he said.
Mr. Delmas. on the redirect. brought out that
McCaleb had seen Mr.. Jerome a week or ten
days after the tragedy, having met him at the
Union Club. He made statement later to tho
prosecution John Doe subpoena which was
sworn to. Mr.. Jerome on ss-examination
followed this opening. and showed the witness
his sworn testimony, which he identified Mr.