The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1907-10-02
SUPREME COURT
CASES ARE SET
Long List of Disputes Upon
Which Higher Court Win
Begin Monday.

Ihe following are the cases now O
the Supreme Court calendar for til
next session which convenes next Nor
day and the beginning of the 1st
term:
Tsuruda V. T. F. Farm Exception
from Circuit Court, First Circuit. {
f. ChillingWorth for plaintiff -appelle,
w. w. Thayer for defendant-appel
liant.
Transit & Land Co.. Exceptions fror
Circuit Court, First Circuit. E. c. Pc
tiers for plaintiff-appellee, Castle /
! Wilmington and j. W. Cathcart for de
| fendant-appellant.
Wo Sing & Co. v. Yuen Kau. Erro
! to Circuit Court, First Circuit w. w
Thayer for plaintiffs-appellees E. NJ
Watson for defendant appellant.
| Wakeki Heleluhe and Kahakuako
Kealohapau v. Honolulu RapiS
Transit & Land Co. Exceptions from
Circuit Court, First Circuit J. j
Dunno for plaintiff appellants, CASH
& wilmington for defendant appellee.
David L. Peterson V. Charles r
Frazier. Exceptions from Circuit, Firs
Circuit. G. f. Peterson for plaintiff
appellee, E. C. Peters for defendant
appellant.
Walter C. Peacock ". John G. Roth
well. Exceptions from Circuit Court
First Circuit. C. w. Ashford for plain
tiff -appellee, A. G. NJ. Robertson for
defendant-appellant.
In re assessment of Income Taxes
Makee Sugar Co. Appeal from Tx
Appeal Court. Kauai. Attorney GEN
eral and NJ. F. Prosser for Tax Asses
sor-appellee, w. A. Kinney for tag
payer-appellant.
F. r. Harris v. Byron o. Clark. EsI-
ceptions from Circuit Court, First Cir
cult. III. G. Middleditch for plaintiff
fendant-appellant
Territory v. All Sing ct al. Error to
Circuit Court, First Circuit. Attorney
General and NJ. f. Prosser for plain
R. W. Breekons for de-
fendants-appellant
In re assessment of Income Taxes,
Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Co. APP
peal from Tax Appeal Court, Kauai.
Attorney General, NJ. F. .Prosser and
D. H. Case for Tax Assessor appellant,
Castle & Wilmington for taxpayer-ap-
pellee.
Alice K. Kaae v. Kaula Richardson
ct al. Exceptions from Circuit Court,
Second Circuit. James L. Coke for
plaintiff-appellee, D. H. Case for de-
fendants-appellants.
In re application of F. r! Lucweiko
for a writ of mandamus against James
w. Pratt, Commissioner of Public
Lands of the Territory. Appeal from
Circuit Court. First Circuit. t. M.
Harrison for petitioner-appellee, J. w.
Cathcart for respondent-appe
James L. Holt, Tax Assessor v. Ed
gar Wood. Reserved question from
Circuit Judge. First Circuit. Attorney
General for plaintiff, Smith & Lewis
and L. J. Warren for defendant.
John D. Moore ". Clinton G. Ballen-
tyne ct al Appeal from Circuit Judge,
First Circuit. C. w. Ashford for plain
tiff appellant, Attorney General and E..
c. Peters for defendants-appellees.
Frederick j. Lowrey ct al, trustees
v. Territory. Original. Castle & With
ngton and Smith & Lewis for plain
lifts, Attorney General for defendant.
William w. Bierce, Limited ". Clin-
j.
rom Circuit Court, First Circuit A.
). NJ. Robertson for plaintiff-appeilee,
Castle & Wilmington and j. w. Cath
,art for defendant-appellant.
hose through, by and under whom he
occupies the premises.
ADOPTION ALLOWED.
The petition of D. w. Keliikaikiole
or the adoption of four minor children
vas granted yesterday by Judge De
Bolt The petitioners relationship to
he children is that he is the former
husband of their mothers mother. Now
lie is their father. All concerned live
t Koolauloa.
A JAPANESE DIVORCE.
Nui Kameda filed bill of Complaint
n divorce proceedings yesterday |
gainst Tsunesuke Kameda. The cou-
lie were married in Japan in 1897 and
he court is asked to unite the Japa-
ese knot because of the desertion of |
he complainant by the defendant. A.
!. Humphreys appears for the petit
Toner.
THE HOLT ESTATE.
Helen A. Cushingham, guardian of
be minor defendants in the case of
lay K Brown VS.. Henry Holmes ct
l., dealing with the James r. Holt
state, filed an answer to the plain
ifs complaint yesterday through her
ttorneys, Smith & Lewis, denying all
of the allegations made
18th the exception of the admission of
1e partition rights of her wards.
An answer of F. e. Steere, in the
tme action, admits the claim of the
laintiff as sub-lessee in the lands In
olved.
VESSELS VS.. VESSELS.
George Vessels and Kekahuna Wes-
is We're married in Haula in 1890.
even years of welded bliss followed,
hen Kekahuna "disregarded the SO.
unity of her marriage vow utterly
Id wilful1y and without cause desert
and abandoned" George and con-
nues to desert and abandon him
,ainst his will and without his con-
MT. Wherefore he has filed divorce