The Washington herald., 1907-12-24
DAILY COURT RECORD
(sIonday. Deeember p, 1e07.l

(MOnday, DecS
Present: The Chisf Justice Mr. Justice Brewer.
Mr., Justice White. Mr.. Justice Peckham Alr.
Justice McKonna, Mr. Justice Holmes. Mr. Justice
Day, and MT. Justice MOODY.
James r. Sloane, CT New York City. ad-
mltted 20 practice.
Nc. Il. The Old Dominion Steamship Company.
owner. &c, petitoner vs.. Primus Gilmore ad-
icinistratcr et al on writ Of certiOrau 10 the
United States Circiit COurt of Appeals fer the
second circuit; decree affirmed alth costs -and
cause remanded 70 the District Court Of the United
States for the Southern district Of New YoIk
opinion by Mr. Justice Holmes.
Nos S and 81. The Water. Light and Gas Com
pany Of Hutchinson. Kans.. appellant. The City
q Hutchinson et al; appeals from the Circuit
Court Of the United States for the district q
Kansas; DEGREES affirmed with costs; opinion By
Mr. Justice McKenna-
The Chief Justice announced the following orders
q the court
No. -. original Ex parte: In the matter Of
The State Of Nebraska. petitioner: motion Tor
leave 20 file petition for a writ cf mandamus
granted and rules TO show cause awarded return
able Monday. January g. 1893.
No. ~. original IA parte: in the matter o.
W W Bierce, Ltd, petitioner; motion for leave
o. hlc petition for a wit Il maudamus granted
and rule 10 show cause awarded retumable Mon
day. January p. 1893
No. SCI l. L. McCandless. plaintiff in error.
vs. George z. Carter. governor. &c. ct al Writ
Il error dismissed 10 George L. Carter governor
&c. and motion 20 dismiss as 20 Pratt commis-
sioner. &e, postponed 10 the hearing the merits.
No. 45I. The Railroad Commission of Louisiana
appellant. vs. Cumberland Telephone and Telegraph
Company; motion for wit % certorar granted with
OUT prejudice; additional rec0Id presented. with the
application TO stand as return 20 the writ.
No. 50l. Old Nick Williams Company petitioner,
vs. The United States: petition for writ q GER
tloIan 20 the United States Circuit Court Of Ap-
peas for the Fourth circuit granted.
No 89- C0rscana Petroleum Company: peti-
TONER rs " II staley; Petition fer a writ Of
octiorar 10 the United States Circuit Court Of Ap-
peals for the Fifth circuit denied
No 5A Richard Cohen ct al petitioners vs..
The United States; petition for writ Of cer;iorari
TO the United states Circuit Court Of Appeals for
the Second circuit denied.
No. 500 Benjamin ID. Greene et a.. petitioners.
vs. Tie Ocited States; petitions for a wit OF
ceruorau 20 the United States Circuit Court Of
Appeals for the Fifth circuit denied
No. SIS The Mills Transportation COMPANY. neti-
TONER. IS The Great Lakes Towing Company; peti-
iion for a Writ uf certiOuH 20 the United States
Circuit Court Of Appeals for the sixth circuit de-
No. 81. James G. Whitaker. administrator. &c
petitioners Us. A. B. Baxter & Co.. ard
No 5a Ad0lph Joseph petitioner vs. A. B.
Baxter CO.. petition for Writs % certorari 20 the
United States Circuit Court q Appeals Tor the Sec
ond circuit denied.
No. So Utah Consolidated Mining COMPANY. pc
utloner. rs. James Godfrey e. al petition for a
writ of cc-orur 10 the United States Circuit Court
q ApIcals FOR the Eighth circuit denied.
No n Louis Stewart plaintiff IN error IS The
state oi L0uis, "a: IN error % the Supreme Court
oi the State n Louisiana; per c1riam. wit Il
eTTof dismissed for the want of jIrsdction jacob
vs. Alabama IS l.. $. l3. IA. 356: Railway Com
pauy vs.. Mcclure lS l. 5 lgs. Cox vs. Teas
52 T. ;. ii6: West vs.. Louisiana. lsi T. s. IS
Chafln vs. Eye l79 L. 5. u Louisiana rs. DEF
iela. q La An, 55i. ana clscs L1uisiun1 vs.
Heunessy Il L.. Ar. SO
No So Val Marciniak plaintiff in error. vs.
- aHn -
C0ur- Z the State q Minnesota: per c1lriara
Judgment affirmed with cu1ts. Natal Is DOuisiana
L9 l. 5. 6z. Wilson ". North Carolina. lss T.
; o-6 Hambin - Western Land Company, -Ig7
L. s.. i3l.
No So The City q Omaha et al. appellants
vs. The Omaha Water Company: appeal from the
United States Circuit Court q Appeals FOR the
Eighth circuit; Ier cInam; appeal dismissed fer
Wiilt q jurisdiction. Scllosscr IS Hemphil. I93
- =, 4i5; Boom Company IS. United States. 2f2
L. :. 6i3; California Consolidated Mining Com
Tany rs Manley. I8 U. =. 572 Ce-tiorari dcrief
ilica,p an+ Nortn0estcru Railway Company ys
oshoTne lt5-s. $, -; Melissa vs. Ref ln L. s.
t5i- For>y The IS. Hammond. l66 T. s. SO
No 81 William Gordon Crawford. petitioner
vs. The United States; motion 20 advance sub
mittsd By Mr. solicitor General Hoyt for the
respondent
Nc. i2s. Thomas Battle. plaintiff in error. rs
The United States: motions go advance and for
leave 20 proceed in f0ma paupsris submitted by
NT- solicitor General Hoyt IN behalf Of counsel
iCr plaintiff IN cuCr-
No SIS IRE United states. plaintiff IN error.
IS James bitty: motion % advance submitted by
Nr- Solicitor General Hoyt for the plaintiF IN
error.
Nc iss- James r. Je'ton. revenue agent. &c.
90 a.. appellants vs.. University cf the south
r,-sslsned fC- argument on Monday Jaruarv 2
l2s, a. motion g; Mr.. Edward 7. Sanford. in BE-
half q counsel
Nc IS. Bradley W Palmer e al. pctitiourrs
- The state q Texas e. a. petition f5r a Writ
G ccrti0rau % the United states CIr7lit Court
N7-lelu storey, for the petitioners. with leave 10
ML T. ". Gregory 20 file brief for respondents
within I'VE days, STAY q proceedings IN court be
low granted wutl further order of this cou--
No -. Adoluhus Cuulson. plaintiff in error
rs The GovUrmen- q the Canal Zone. leave
granted 10 plaintiff In error % proceed IN forma
parIers On motion Cf NJ. Moordeid Storey. for
the plaintiff N error.
No. = Eusene f.. Robinson. appellant. vs.. An
drew =. Duyau. executor. Sc. e aI nz,Ja+c
granted on uistion Of Mr.. a. B. DuvaH for the
arpeileCs
No 5i2 Lawrence Z. Sexton as receiver. a.,
petitioner vs. Armstrong Cork COMPANY. petftion
for wit u certigra1 20 tire United states Circuit
Court Of Appeals from the Second cirait submitted
by Mr.. William n. Coleman IN behalf Of Mr. WIN
lam ID. Guthrie Mr. f. G. Henderson and NJ
Herbert Noble and Mr. James r. sloane for the
respondent
No. p. Northern Pacific Railway Company. plain
tif IN crror The State Of Minnesota. ex rel The
CITY Of Duiutl argument concluded by M Bert
Fezler for the defendant in error.
Adjourned until Monday, January g. 1905. at Y
O'Clock.
The day cali for Monday. January s. 1905. VIII h,
follows: Nos. 49, 356. s26. 5 original. : and
and 81 s. g. g. g. and l0l iand lQ2