Amador ledger., 1907-05-31
Notice.

In the Superior Court of the county
of Amador, STATE Of California.
Charles Nj. Belshaw, Marietta Wal
lace, Geo. h. Wallace and Walter
Morgan. plaintiffs, VS.. Bunker Hill
Consolidated Mining Company,
corporation, defendant.
Pursuant to an order of the superior
court above named, duly given and
made in the above entitled matter,
Notice is hereby given that there is
pending in aud before the above
named court, the above entitled
action, and the name of the parties
thereto are as set forth hereiHahove,
and that said action is brought
against the above named. defendant,
Bunker Hill Consolidated Mining
Company, corporation, to obtain
order and Judgment of said court can
ceiling the destroyed certificates of
stock heretofore Issued by said cor
poIation to the persons and stock
holders OF said corporation, In the
number of shares each respectively
as follows, to wit; Charles NJ. Bel
shaw, five hundred shares: Charles
NJ. Belshaw, five hundred shares,
Marietta b. Wallace, five hundred
shares; Geo. E. Wallace, five hun
dred shares, and Water Morgan, six
hundred shares, the certificate num-
Der of said certificates so issued each
respectively being unknown to
plaintiffs or defendant, except the
certificate mum bers of said shares of
Charles NJ. Belshaw, which are, re.
speetively, certificates numbered All
aud 4l2; and directing said corpora
tion to issue to said plaintiffs, said
stockholders, new and duplicate
certificate of stock of said corpora
tion. IN lieu of the certificates
uf stock so destroyed. representing
the amount of shares of the capital
stock OF said corporation to each
respectively, as above set forth:
And all persons claiming said shares,
or any of them, or any interest or
lien therein OF thereqpon, are notified
to be and appear before the above
named court at the court room there
of, in the Court House of said Anna
dor county, in the city OF jackson,
California, on the 10th day of June,
| 1907, at the hour of ten O'Clock a. LII. &.
of said day, then and there to show
cause why new certificates should
not be directed to be issued to the
plaintiffs each respectively in lien OF
the certificates burned aud destroyed,
belonging to each respectively, as is
set forth in said complaint, and to
set forth their rights in or claim to
such shares, or any of them, and if
no one appears within the time, and
before the time designated in such
notice, and before said 10th day of
June, nor within the time allowed by
law for the service of SUNNI ons, the
court will proceed to hear such evil
dence as may be offered in support
of the allegations of the mplaint,
and VIII thereupon make and file its
decision herein, and if the evidence
offered in support of the allegations
in the complaint be sufficient, said
court will enter its judgment, canceII-
ing said destroyed certificates of stock
so held by plaintiffs herein, and
directing said corporation defendant.
upon payment to it of all costs in
Cured by it IN the premises, and
without costs against said corpora
tlon, to issue to each of said plaintiffs
new and dupl1eate certificate in
place of the certificate owned by
plaintiffs each respectively On the
18th day Of April, 1905, and then de-
stroyed.
Witness my hand and the seal of
said Superior Court, this 21st day of
April, A. d. 1907.
(Seal.O j. K. HUBERTY, clerk.
John f. Davis, Attorney for Plain-
tiffs.