The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-10-25
fendant was rendered in the case of W. Q Stewart we JAA w Moore

 o. Stewart vs J@ w Moore.
 Collins & Company vs. w. J. Francis, verdict for plaintiff for s522
 Beck & Gregg Hardware company vs. II. Goldbery, verdict for the plaintiff for $16259
 A. s. Cowan ct al, trustee, vs. United States Fidelity and Guaranty company, dismissed on pleadngs. Madison Lynch vs. Charlie Transfer company and same plaintiff vs. c. c. Flemming ct al., dismissed for want of prosecution.
 The following docket is set in Judge Lanes division today:
 Alabama Paint and Glass company vs. B. c. Lewis, garnishment.
 Mrs. D. Cavanaugh vs. Louisville and Nashville railroad company, appeal by defendant
 F. M. Davis vs. Western Union Tele- graph company. damages.
 Kettle Moore vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages. N. E. McFadden vs. Birmingham Rail- way. Light and Power company, dam ages.
 City Court.
 In the first division of the city court yesterday the case of Moody tS Hay vs. Frank S. White was on trial all day. The following docket is set in the first division today:
 Benton Bros, vs. c. F. Roll ct al, ap- peal by defendant
 Thomas Carlne Sons company vs Bir- mingham Iron and Supply company ct al, assumpsit
 Lee Harden x Company ct al. vs. First National Bank of Birmingham, assumpsit Birmingham Packing company vs. Southern Railway company, damages. Dr. E. M. Robinson vs. Jack w. Cole, assumpsit.
 Bluthenthal & Blackard ct al. vs. Ems ley Stock company ct al, assumpsit Gilbert Carter vs. E. c. Ratliff, assump- sit.
 J. M. Rose vs. Healing Springs Baptist church, assumpsit.
 The George T. wheelock company vs. Hollings & Frickhoeffer, defendants, and Alabama Brewing company ct al, gar nlshees, garnishment on summons. White Blakeslee Manufacturing com vs w. L. Council, assumpsit.
 Drennen & Co., vs NJ. l.. Ritter, de- fendant, and Palos Coal company, gar nishee, attachment.
 John w. Wilkes vs. H. L. Hunter, eject ment.
 J. W. Ferguson vs. A. J. Presley, ap- peal by defendant.
 R. L. O'Neal, Jr., vs Robert L. OKel- ley, deIndant, and Drennen & Co.,, gar nishee, appeal by defendant.
 American Bolt company vs. David Blake. assumpsit
 Annie Kerney vs. James O'Connor, as- sumpsit.
 In the second division of the city court yesterday in the case cs K. D. Saunders vs Western Union Telegraph company the jury returned a verdict for the plain tiff for s450
 Maud Meeks vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company. consent judg- ment for $500.
 George c. Bucknell vs. came defendant. consent Judgment for SS50
 In the third division of the city court yesterday the jury returned a verdict for the defendant in the case of Nose + Roseman vs. Samuel I. Davis company. The plaintiff brought suit against the de- fendant for S2C00 damages for personal in jures to lis eyes and face. caused by an explosive cJgar alleged to have been manufactured by the defendant and sold by local trader
 In the case of J. E. Bridgemore vs. Birmingham Railway. Light and Power company consent judgment for $60 was rendered.
 The cases of Tom Smith and William Watson asamst the Birmingham Railway Light and Power company were dis missed.
 Oils Davis pro ami vs. Southern Rail- road company, dismissed.
 In the equity division of the city court yesterday the case of John Vary vs. W. A. Thompson ct al. was dismissed.
 The case of Mollie Didale adminis- tratrix, vs. B. F. Roden Grocery com pany was argued and submitted.
 The following docket is set in the equity division of the city court to- day:
 J. D. Burson vs. B. c. Liter, Lula E. Harton vs NJ. K Gilkey ct als., Lula B. Harton vs Louise C. Wiehle. Mayor and Council of Ensley vs. Louise Terry Mayor and City Council of Ensley vs c. C. Tetherow.
 Chancery Court.
 The following docket is set in the chancery court today:
 J. w. Davidson ct al. administrators, vs Sloss- -Sh heffeld Steel and Iron com panY: D. w. Graybill ct al. ys. D. NJ. Drennen ct al. George E. Harrison Vs. Hinton F. Carr; eX parte R. J. Gard ner; Wesley Short Vs. Mamie l.. Ed wards ct all; G. w. Brown vs. J. M Huey ct als. Levi Parker vs. Sloss Iron and Steel company; H. w. Glass vs. Sloss Iron and Steel company; Mayor and Aldermen of Birmingham vs. Bir- mingham Water Works company: ]. A. Mcdaniel vs. Sloss Iron and Steel com pany ct al.
 Suits Filled.
 w. w. Hare filed suit in the circuit court against the Tennessee Coal. Iron