The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1907-10-10

On Monday evening at $3.50 O'Clock
the October term Of district court con-
vened in this village with Judge
Myron D. Taylor of St. Cloud presid-
ing.
Court was formally opened by
Sheriff Shockley and the judge pro-
ceeded to appoint deputies for the
term and dispose of such other pre-
liminaries as were necessary. This
concluded, an adjournment was taken
until the following morning at 9
O'Clock.
No grand jury was subpoenaed at
this term of court, the county attorney
deciding that the summoning of such
body was unnecessary.
The suits tried at this term with the
manner of their disposition are here
under given:
State of Minnesota in personal prop
erty tax proceedings VS.. Don Saus-
ser. j. A. Ross for state. Settled.
Anje Damhof vs.. VIM. B. Mitchell.
Foster & Burns for plaintiff, Stewart
s. Brewer for defendant. This was a
suit to determine title to real estate.
Judgment ordered to be entered in &C
cordance with stipulation.
John A. Hubers vs.. VIM. B. Mitch
ell ct al. Foster & Burns for
plaintiff, Stewart & Brewer for de-
PENDANTS. Suit to determine title to
real estate. Judgment ordered to be
entered in accordance with stipulation.
Arthur W. Sleeves VS.. James CHS
holm. Chas. A. Dickey for plaintiff,
Stewart & Brewer for defendant.
This was an action brought by Arthur
W. Sleeves to enforce the payment OF
balance of S103.S4 claimed to be due
him as wages while working in the
woods for defendant in the winter OF
1906. Defendant set forth that he con-
tracted with plaintiff for a full win
ter's work and that said plaintiff
failed to live up to said contract,
abandoning his work before the ex-
piration Of the contract and before
the labor for which he contracted was
completed. The case was tried by a
jury and verdict returned for the
full amount claimed by plaintiff with
interest. A stay of Judgment for
twenty days was granted.
W. J. Eynon VS.. Thos. F. Norton.
Thos. H. Salmon for plaintiff, F. N.
Hendrix for defendant. Action for
libel in which plaintiff seeks to re-
cover damages in the sum of $40, 900.
In consequence of the absence Of a
material witness the trial of the case
was continued to the April term Of
court. This makes the third time this
suit has been continued.
Howard G. Park ct al. VS.. Samuel
Winsor ct al. Reynolds & Roeser for
plaintiffs, Geo. G. Stiles and Chas. A.
Dickey for defendants. Suit to col.
lect on a second note for 81, 900 giver
by Samuel Winsor and others in pay.
ment for the purchase of a stallion.
Case continued by consent. The case
on the first note came up for hearing
at the April, 1906, term of the district
court, this first note being held by the
Union National Bank of Columbus,
- Ohio. At that time the court gave an
Instructed verdict for plaintiff. De.
PENDANTS made motion for a new
trial, which was denied and an appeal
was taken to the supreme court. The
supreme court reversed the order OF
the; district court by granting such
new trial. Plaintiff, the Union Ma.
tional Bank, failed to note case for
trial at this term of court.
Chas. h. Rines vs.. Willard Howard.
Chas. A. Dickey for plaintiff, E. L.
Mcmillan for defendant. Replevin
suit. Mary Rines, executrix of the
late Chas. Fl. Rines, was substituted
as plaintiff and the case continued by