CanÌƒon City record. [volume] (CanÌƒon City, Colo.) 1883-192?, 1907-06-20


known as Barry, to the servants in the
Bradley household. was the first Wit
ness In the Haywood trial today. He
said that Orchard came to his store
and spent considerable money there
and asked a great many questions
about the Bradley household and want
ed to be introduced to the servants.
Guibbinni said he got him a room in
the neighborhood and saw him NOV
ing his luggage into the room the
night before Bradley was dynamited.
He also saw the poisoned milk. The
defense resumed the tactics of yester-
day by attempting to strike ou the tes-
timony Of the witness as not connect
ing Haywood with the offense charged.
The motion was overruled. Darrow on
cross examination devoted himself to
getting the conditions under which
this witness was brought to Boise to
testify. The witness said that detect
ives had come to him and told him that
he would have to come to Boise and
that there was no use in trying to
dodge IT. He said he received 5000 to
cover his expenses on the trip.
The prosecution called as the next
witness Hull McClaughry. assistant
postmaster at San Francisco, who was
interrogated as to a registered letter
Orchard said he received from Petit
bone In San Francisco. At that time
Orchard was going under the name of
Dewpey and Pettibone used the name
OF J. Wolf in transmitting the letter,
which contained 500. Mr.. McClaughry
had the registry records OF San Fran
cisco, those which showed the receipt
OF the letter in question on August 13.
1904. The envelope was postmarked
Denver. August 10th. The record
showed the delivery OF the letter from
Woln to Dewpey and was admitted in
evidence by Judge Wood over the pro-
test of the attorneys for the defense,
onthe ground that there was nothing
to connect the defendant. Haywood.
with the matter.
Boise. Idaho June 1.-THE men who
are batting to save the life OF William
d. Haywood and the good name of the
Western Federation OF Miners, made
their greatest assault upon Harry
Orchard yesterday when carrying the
review by cross examination Of his life
u crime down to his confession they
bitterly assailed his guiling motives.
Six days they spent In stripping him
before the jury OF every shred OF NOR
ality of character and then suddenly
turning upon him in final iierce attack
they fought with every means known
to the legal craft to convince tn" jury
that Orchard was committing a crime
in falsely swearing away the lives OF
innocent men in the hope OF saving bis
own. They carried their attack to the
very language with which the withess
answered their questions and every
where they alleged by forceful impli-
cation that II was put into his mouth
by men controlling him.
Orchard failed when they recited to
him the tale OF King David and Uriah
that Detective Mcfarland related to
him when he came seeking = confess
sion. He fought to save himself. but
tears filled his eyes and he rocked
unevenly like a fainting woman He
defended his motives by saying that he
had finally found true conversion and
In penitence had resolved TO make all
possible reparation by freely confess
ing all Mcfarland had hold him that
he was doing a great service for the
state and that states were kind to men
who served them. There was no other
promise.
You knew that II you confessed to
the Steunenberg murder the state
would put you out Of the way!" ham
nersd Attorney RieharSson. "a (. 4