Williams news., 1907-09-28

Wnlcn was Gtturneu- Tor want Ol any evidence tn convict.
 Manuel Flores was indicted fo the murder of Juana Apodaca. Mexican woman with whom he hac been living in this city. A few seconds after shooting the woman he shot himself. hut although hadl, wounded. be did not die. Flores. when he was arranged. plead guilty. and the testimony. most V of his own confessions, was taken on Tuesday, and he was sentenced or Friday to the penifentiary for life Sheriff Francis took him to Yuma last Monday.
 The court also disposed of tn, following civil cases.
 William Park vs. Perrin and Perrin. was dis missed for want ot prosecution.
 The Grand Canyon Railway Co.,. vs. R. H. Cameron was by agree ment continued for the term.
 Two cases of Miles J. Cameron ct all vs. Martin Bugeeln tt al. were ended by the court sustaining | demurrer in each case on ar order of the supreme court.
 William Crowell vs. G. W. Mar tin and C. E Boyce was continued for the term for want of service of summons on Martin. and the death of Crowell.
 Thos. F. Noonan vs. Coconino Copper Co.,, was continued. as no pne appeared for either party.
 Ed 1. Gale vs. E. H. Cameron. m action on a promis-ary note, was by agreement passed.
 Lillie 5. Gill vs. Independent Order of Foreslers. upon insurance policy upon the life of man claimed 10 have been killed by g bear, was also continued for the term.
 All of the above are old cases that have been dragging along in the past.
 In he Grand Canyon Railway Go. vs Tax Collector of Coconiuo County. in which the railway com patty claimed exemption under the law. of certain properti,s, includ ing "El Tovar" hotel, the court rendered its decision on Monday. holding the property lia bic for taxes, and not exempt. District Attorney Ashurst and E. M. Doe appeared for the county. The case will probably be appealed to tn, supreme court.
 In Bahhitt Bros vs w A. Daggs and F. P. Dtggs, for removal oi judgment, the ease was passed b, the court.
 In the case of Dick Shults vs Saginaw dE Manistee Lumber Co. an ac'i"n brought by Shults [, recover $31 ,23O for injuries which he claimed to have sustained on he 26th day ofMay. 1906, the sui was com menced hy Cooke < Cooke. attorneys. residing in San Antonio. Texas. who were represented in court hv Rees Ling. of Prescott. who appeared for Shults, and X N. Sleeves appeared for the com pany. The defense filed a motion to dismiss the action for want of merit, and tk:e court allowed the motion. which ends the case.
 In the Town of Flagstaff vs Town Council, the court sustained the council.
 Divorces were granted in the following eases:
 Inez Armandarez vs. Jose Ar mandarez.
 Chas Won Achen vs. Sarah E Vod Achen.
 H C. Sanders vs E. G. Sanders T. II. Wagner vs. Adda V. Wag- ner.
 Patricia Rentiria vs. Desiderio Ren:iria
 Nellie Wilson vs. William Will son. the court opened a decree in order to settle property rights J. A. Johnson vs. the A. |. G $. F. Railway Co was an appeal case from Justice Lanein's court. and owing to a defect in the transcript as sent up. the appeal was dis missed.
 A mandamus proct eding was instituted hy ". O. Perkins to compel the board of supervisors of this county to levy the tax pro vid~d for by law for school pur- poses. Upon a hearing Judge Sloan ordered them to make the levy. By this an increase of twenty five cents on each hundred dollars of taxa ble property will have to be levied The board, by its taking SO much of the forest reserve fund allowed the county. for roads I