The evening star and Newark advertiser. [volume] (Newark, N.J.) 1907-1908, 1907-11-18
NEWARK 7 A X
ON CENTRAL
STANDS
Court Of Errors and Appeals
Passes on Cases Of In
terest Here.
Especial to the Evening star.l

loptCidl " tuc I<NchiHB oldt III
TRENTON, Nov. 1S.--In the case of
the Central Railroad to have certain
taxes assessed against 1t in the city
of Newark. set aside on the ground
that it had been assessed at a greater
value than other property held by in
dividuals, the Court of Errors and APP
peals today refused TO set aside the
assessment on the ground that it had
not been shown that the property had
been assessed in excess of its true value.
The question as to whether it had been
assessed at a greater value than other
property in the municipality, the court
holds, is not well taken.
Decisions in the following cases were
announced:
Erie Railroad against city of Pater-
son. affirmance.
Charles S. King against Artemecia
Morris, reversal.
Spencer Aldrich against A. Louise
Peckham, affirmance.
William A. Squire against Princeton
Lighting Company, reversal.
Frank Woolsey against Virginia M.
Woolsey, affirmance.
Company against Princeton Lighting
Company, reversal.
Charles w. Loche against George
Hoyt, affirmance.
State against Joseph Labriola, af-
firmance.
State against Benjamin Clark, af-
firmance.
State against Joseph Moore. affirm
ance.
State against Harry Upwin. affirm
ance.
Central Railroad of New Jersey
against Board Of Equalization of
Taxes, afiirmance.
Mayor and Aldermen of Jersey City
against Board Of Equalization, affirm
ance.
Colon Fulton against Grieb Rubber
Company, afiirmance.
Antono Costa against township of
Crawford, af1irmance.
Maurice Legley against Clement
Studebaker, jr., affirmance.
Charles Rodgers against West Jer-
sey and Seashore Railroad, affirmance.
Rachel Van Houten against Catherine
A Peck, affirnance
Morris Canal and Banking Company
against Diamond Drill Mills Paper
Company. affirmance.
Joseph S. Low against Robert c. Tay-
lor reversal.
Herman & Grace against John f.
Sayward, affirmanee.
Klementina Batura against Thomas
Mcbride, reversal.
Alexander G. Anderson against
Abram A. Cortelyou, reversal.
Herman e Grace against Board of
Freeholders, Essex County, affirmance.
Albert Nirk against Jersey City, Ho-
boken and Paterson Street Railway
Company, affirmance.
Herbert Fox against Kinnear Pressed
Radiator Company. afiirmanee
West Shore Railroad Company
against William Winner. .affirmance.
Trenton Society and Charity against
Gershom M. Howell, afirmance.
State against Frederick Lang, affirm
ance.
In the caste of the State against
Frederick Lang, the conviction of muir
der In the first degree Is sustained.
Lang was convicted of numbering his
sweetheart in New Brunswick and his
case was taken up on the fact that one
of the members of the Grand Jury who
found the indictment against him was
over the age prescribed by law for
Grand Jury duty. The court disposed
of this by saying that the question
should have been brought up at the
time the Grand Jury was sworn.
In the case OF the State against Harry
Unwin the conviction of Unwin for vlo-
lation of the automobile speed law Is sus-
toined This suit was brought tor the
purpose Of testing the constitutionality Of
the Frelinghuysen law. The court sus
tains the law.
Meet me It NIHIoNs. 1ss Market st--Adv