The Washington herald. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1906-1939, 1907-03-05
DAILY COURT RECORD.
supreme Court of the United States,

bell, q Oklahoma City. Okla; Robert W
Childs, Of Chicago H. g. A. Maeaw. Of Topeka
Kans. Horace Phelps q Denver, Colo. Ebert
Hand. q Racine. Wis, ami Willoughby ;. cHesiey
Of Washington. d. g.. were admitted 90 practice
No d. Catherine Schlemmer plaintiff in error
The Buffalo. Rochester and Piftsburg Railway
Company: in error 10 the supreme C0urt # tht
Stare Of Pennsylvania; Judgment reversed viii
eosis and cause Femanded for further proceeding.
not inconsistent with the opinion Il this court
Opinicn by Mr. Justice Holmes Dissenting; Mr.
Justice Brewer. Mir. Justice Peekham, Mr. justice
Mckenna, and slrs. Justice Day
No l9i. The United States. ex rel Willis .
West. plaintiff in error. vs. Ethan 4 Hltcncocs
Secretary q the Interior; IN urtr 10 the Court o.
Appeals Of the District Of Columbia; Judgment az
fmed with costs Opinion 10y Air. Justice Holmes
No l59 Wilmington Star Mining company PLAIN
tia in error, vs. Minnie Fulton in crlur 20 The
Circuit Court Of the United states for the Northern
district of Illinois Judgment reversed with ccsi'
and cause romsnded for further proceedings con
sisteEt with the opinion q this court Opinioh %
Mr. Justice White.
No SO citizens Saving. and Trust Company
appellant vs. Illinois Central Railroad COMPANY
ct a. appeal from the Circuit Court q the United
States for the Eastern district Of Illinois; decIe'
reversed. with costs. and cause remandtd that IN,
plaintiff may proceed as il may be advised with tn'
preparation Of tbe under the act Of ls45 opih
ion by NJ. Justice Harlan.
No. III NicEolas Y. Halter et AL ldainliHS 10
error vs. the State Of Nebraska, IN error TO me
supreme Court of the state q Nebraska JHdgInen'
affirmed With costs Opinion by Sir. justice haf
Ian Dissenting. ar Justice Peckham.
No. Sc. James q. Tiuseg appellant, vs. Morgan
Treat United States marshal et al.
No. so William Oct. hcssler. appellant, y
Morgan Treat United States marshal. CT al:
No. 81. samuel T. Morgan. appellant vs. Morgan
Treat United States marshal et al;
No. 572 Austin b. Carpenter. appellant. IS. Nor
gan Treat United states marshal. ct all
No. g73. Fortcsque White. appellant vs. Morgan
Treat United States MARSHAL e. al
40. 81 Frank r. Wilcox. appellant. vs.. Morgan
Treat, United states marshal, II al;
No. N5. George Bra6en. appellant. IS. Morgan
Treat, United states marshal. et al
No So. Frank S. Royster. appellant. vs. Morgan
Treat. United States marshal et al
No. ST. J. Rice smith. appellant. vs. Morgan
Treat United states marshal. ct al.
No. 5-2 Charles p. Burroughs appellant rs. Nor
gan Treat United States marshal. e a., and
No SO Charles II Mcdowell. appellant vs.. Nor
gan Treat United States marshal. ct al appeals
from the Circuit C0ur q thr United states Tor INC
Eastern district u Virginia nn2i orders reversed
with costs ard causes Temsnded with directions %
discharge appellants from custody under the orders
and warrants o. removal without prejudice % re-
newal % the applications o. remove. Opinion p,
Mr. Chief Justice Fuller. Dissenting, Mr.. Justice
Harlan (Alr Justice Moody took no part ~ The
decision Of these cases.
dcrs OF the court
No. - Original * psrte: In the matter OF
John Armstrong Chanler. petitioner molten for ieaFe
to file petition Tor a writ q prohibition denied.
No 100 Louisa SAFER - g.. plaintiffs in error.
IS The City q New Yors assigned for rearglment
On Monday. March IS, after he Gases already as
signed Tor that day.
Nos Ssl and 70 Adams Express Company. plain
til IN eTrUr. vs. The Commonwealth u Kentucky
and
No. SIS. American Expires Company e New YORK,
plaintiff in error. s.. The Commonwealth Of hen
lucky motion 20 advance granted and cases assigned
20 he heard one case on AUTi Is, after cases a.
ready assigned for that day.
No. 80 George Deslions q al petitioners. "a
Ia Compauie General Trsusarlautque. owner. &c,
consideration q the petiticn for wit u or
tiorsr postponed % the bearing o. the casr.
No. 6ls William J.. b. Taylor, petitioner. rs
The United States. petition FOR writ q certiourl
10 the United States Circuit togr q Appeals Tor
the second circuit granted
No. SIS Robert s. Bright trustee. petitioner. vs.,
The Fifth Consrcg atiouai Church az Washington.
u. G. petition for a wit Of certicraIi TO te Court
Of Appeals Ct the District II Columbia denied.
Ne, 595 Alfred kessler Ct a., petitioners vs.. The
Ensiey Land Ccmrauy e al petition for wit
of cgrt0ran to the United States CirCIit Court Of
Appeals for TIE Fifth circuit denied.
No. 52s John stephens Cr al, petitioners IS.
A T. Brlst IT aL. petition for d r1it II crtioTa-i
the Fourth circuii denied.
No. 800 81. Louis and san Fra1cisco Railroad
Company, letiiiouCr. VS. John r. Mc,wean. Ieti
ton for a writ n ccrticrari O. the United States
Circuit Court n Appeals Tor th1 Fifth circuit
deuied.
No. 6zI william f. Wilder. petitioner. IS. A.
wen J Blackfr5 petition for a writ q c5rti0rar
20 the Court q Appeals q the District Of Columbia
denied.
Nos 30 and 2ll. Isaac Va Fowler. receiver. Sc
Cirlit Court az the United states for the District
Of Colorado DISMISSED for The want q jurisdiction
on the authority q Louisville Trust Company vs.
Knott, l95 a. s. E5. and eases therein cited
Bashe HUNT. I93 L. S S. IS.
No. ISL John R0mig Ct al. appellants. Myrtls
Gille;t appeal from the supreme Court q the Ter
ritory Of Oklahoma. Dismissed for want q uris
dicsion. Schlo-sfr e. Hnuhfl ls6 T. S 70. and
cases cited iu California Consolidated Mining Com
fauy IS. Marey 90 e. :. SO.
No. fs. Chod, Thomas. plaintiff in error. vs.
The State e Kansas: IN error 70 the supreme
Court Of the State Of Kansas Dismissed for the
want a. jurisdiction. Eicuhcc5cr District Court
a Plymouth county i5f Z. s -, Musier IS
Kansas. Is [. =. 62 Crowley IS ChustguSel,
IS, L. s. S.; Giozya vs.. ncnaE. is {. :. 662
Otis vs- Parker is- 4. 5. Co. Coz. Bs. Castillo vs.
AfCC0nnicD l6S L. :. ga Smiley kansas, III
L. $ So Case below z; pac Rep. 100
No. IS Illinois Central Railroad Company Ct al
appellants. IS. Interstate Commerce Commission
motion 70 advance submitted by Alr. Solicitor Gen
ersl Hoyt for the appellee.
No. 65l. southern Railway Company ct a.. sp
pcllauts. -. Il. II. Tiff CO a.; Iu.lon 60 advance
submitted by M. Solicitor General Hoyt N behalf
Of counsel for the apueuees.
No. e. Luigi Gandoh CT sl.. petitioners. vs.
Alfredo e. Sieger surviving partner &c petition
fer writ Of cgrtioreri 20 the United States Circuit
Court of Appeals from the second circuit. sgu
mitted Dy Mr.. John Brnoks LeaVitt and Mr.. Ed
mund Wctmofe for The petitioners, and by Mr.
+. y. whitney for the respondent.
No. ga Frederick ". Ward. petitioner. vs. John
p. Hart Trustee. ct al; petition feg writ %.
certj0Tari TO the United States Circait Cour; OF
Appeals for the Fourth Cucut; submitted ly Mr
Z. Hilton jackson 10 behalf of NJ. \. 3. Archer
for the pctitIuneg.
No. STA Clarence 7. HINT. appellant, vs. tie New
York Cotton Exchange. advanced under the thirty
second rule on motion OF Mr. Martin IL Foss. 10
behalf Of counsel. and submitted hy Mr.. Thomas
B. Tuley and Mr. william II. Carroll Tor the APP
aellant ana hy lir. Henry :. Robbins. Nir. Henry
W Taft ard Mr. Henry Craft fol the appellee
No. l. Edward J. pearcy plaintiff in error. v.
Nevada y StTanahan: submitted hy Mr. James e..
Lenney for the plaintiff in Cuor. and by NIr. At
to.uey General BonsTartc, Mr.. Solicitor General
Hoy, and Mr. Otis J. Carlton for the defendant in
error.
No, - William Moore Ct al. appellants. vs.
X. J. Mctiurc ct al; argument concluded by Mr..
u L. MIXERS for the appellants aud case sub
mitted by AR. J. VI. Moore fer the sppellecs.
No. 4sI. Addison Johnson. agent and warden
appellant. rs. Charles G.. Browne, argument com
menced by Mr. W. Wicihsm Smith for the sp
pclsnt aud continued by Nj. Terence j. McAIanus
for The appellee.
Adjourned until to-day at Y O'Clock.
The day call for 20 dav viii be fellows Nos.
ISL. 50 land s. and 81 223 rs 25, 20. p. 29
go land 23i 23a, aud 229l. and 22l
DISTRICT COURTS.
Court of Appeals.