The evening world., 1907-05-09
HAYWOOD TRIAL ON
AND TROOPS GUARD
AS JURY is DRAWN
Prisoner Wears Confident Air in
Crowded Courtroom at Boise
Authorities Ready for Any
Outbreak by Rioters

. NhereF
/ no. air"
/ Have you heard this case discussed
By any ons who pretended TO know the
faets1"
. r"No SIR
sieunsubcrE7-
Yes. cir -
How long had you known him.
About four years ,-.t.r.
I Ever have any business relations
with him -.
soldiers Home FOR a vniie. e-itg,sos
political reasons my term OF oilee
Then you were disrharsedT'
Then take 1t YOU and Gov. s'ea-
nrrhorr had n dlffererccr
y differed with him politically al
'nlS f:wihg tnI'' said he had read Of the case
pretty thoroughly IN All the new
Z papers He Is .5s.r,. ns.rT,ssd nan rwins Ia
said he had talked with bis grown son
I regarding the case and the proesodlng-,,
"wAat do you mean by thAiF' asked
Mr., Hawley. auisskit. r-ono,.s ,uro-
that we talked about the length 81
time u would take to FRY the case"
Has No Opinion
have you formed or sxpressed m
oplnlon as % the quit or innnoeenee o.
the accuscd
Have you any opinion now
well" sad the ihlcsmsn. Il dont
think / have. although u SOUNDS Ike,
A wooden man -to say 40"
Ewing said that he had served rs
Juror but once In n capital case and that
was the present term % court
Have YOU any prejudice against cir
cumtsRniial evidence
No not exactly. but I would be very
cafsiYl In approving decision on snea
vas not In the, State at she time pf r1e'
killing but was shown 10 have advised,
encorrrrei and aided In the killing
would that Influence your verdict. nro-
Yided the court instructed you that zach
person was equally responsive with
the man who actually did the killinxy''
would take the Instruction OF the
The examination ot Ewing was b.r.
dropped temporarily and ar. Hawiey
passed on TO the second man II then
became apparent that he would Eo
through the panel OF twelve men be.
,icn of the proposed Jurors
Socialist Papers Sent Him.
The second man. James L. Ayres.
said he was a farmer, married. and had
lived In this county since 1881. He cana
20 this state from Tennessee Ayres
had a passing Acquaintance with steu-
''Do you read any OF N. soclalis,
Ar. Hawley.
20 7 H. Dc / 0S5 5. Ss; but, hey s ha been sent
AyIes said some OF the papers came
20 him by mall. while others were
thrown into his yard
how long has that condition
I'VE object 10 that" Interrupted NJ
parrow FOR the defense The only
question here is the bias of tbs proposcd
any one connected Win this case had
anything 20 do with ihose papers They
nave nothing 20 do with ihe case
in this matter said Judge Wood, "Snd
foT that reason the objection Ia over
Ayres said the papers had been com
ins Tor several months Ne read one
or them for a time but stopped.
WHY asked NJ HAwloy
- got tired OF 10"
Ayr.s then said he had formed and
lengtd by the prosecution Tie de.
Tense resisted the challenge and SIR
RirhRrdseH 81 Has -oud Counsel took
lie drew from Ayre- the statement
that he could render fair verdict
bui IL would take considerable evil
dencs 70 change his present opinion
Challenges Juror
Tho prosecution insisted un1S tho
ehalleage and - wa sustained. Aa
ANres stepped out 0' thn box the dc-
Jpdn @ 3rcokcunlec w.s cal,i.
nre krnriise eats hr vas srno-r and
lAl flsrlfsei tle case pretty thorouE h
siso ihs rsb6i q, fr'nrinnst n t1s lsr fr,.i e
onerf tn Idaho from Colorado ana Ia
toured and eNnTes1ed 4 d.c.dei opInigl.
. NHHH H.I
II ne evidence were different from
what hs had read be thought ae could
change ais opinion. lie NuA not ready.
without hearing The evidence. to decide
tlc fate " The prisoner
hr,e eNnrdgc was challenged ny tae|
prosecution.
rlc defense joluei ln the challenge.
ana me tAAsfman was promptly eH-
cIs~d
a IN glad " agree on somshiax
said air HaNlcy, lAlEhlngiy.
.- Cnpt J D.. Yates. President of tho
Boise Bank ~ CONNER 81 was th- MAJ
iairfmau examined cap. Ntf.s wac
b lni nHi mon1sr lHhir in hih arswr-H.
cver. would n1t inHlence his n. an
iiH rlt fe Nha ru hiaH or frDIrE
nElIH-i ihr FIisa1fI f1u7liY
! ~ iiaviry n's- Z can't Y1te' with
] out q cnrAenHe g1' wen. 0H with hr
rHari.asfi-u o, H'nv. vs. ntter.
JuV Under Guard.
Bakcr made ta. JrI man t.-t5.s,t
for cause Tho othe. ta1. hov.ys- IN.
uot boom luHy uHftuunri hy 'ho d.
fcufe
George Nal'sr. butcher. in cb-i-
SO Nfrn questioned. rld 81. Er.r.
GOV strunenhrfE only Dog sight srl4-
for Bsnh conducted fa-- esaritrs.4 IN
~ W1iEcr
IoH h. "a certain eNtrut--our that "a .i.l
require pretty strulF evidence o. 10
~ tiker allen SAID nc was opplsrd ID,
rnpltal punishment Ntrr. "a w.I
fiai evidence entered intn tie matter
uc vas therefore challenged 81 n.
nroso,uuon Tho defense resisted ana
rrsrryrt thr rgHt f9 question tnr r-...
pos. a Juror later tenaf0r Horah a.tI-
d-,,. the states challenge frnrluar Ii.
Gmrgc "a MclnDr. 81 farmer re~Ir
tus ir the county far toa ycars MA
.rIns questioned whnn fle llnc CON r..
crss until 2 O'Clock wHs ordered
S1tEIthHtanding tHr fact thst fHr
twelve men in ~ iur -f1a had,n1f r.r
swurn. Judge Woof onir-ad that iH.y
| b. kent together