The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-03-05

Brock vs Louisville and Nashville Rail- road company, damages; John Hart vs Birmingham Paint Mills ct al, appeal; Mey Trading company vs. J. W. Denson, appeal John Nichols vs. Peter Likurgias. appeal, J. T. Vaughan, agent, vs. Bon Ton company, attachment; B. V. Brock vs. Alabama Great Southern Railroad company damages; T. R. MeCarty vs. F. D. Brown. appeal; MesserMoore 1nsur- ance and Real Estate company vs. w. R. McArthur, appeal; C. D. Ebersole vs. J. l.. Addington, appeal; George Mariel vs. R. A. Washington, appeal; Richard Joyce vs. Bell and Fleming, appeal; J. c. Truss vs. Southern Railway company, appeal.
 City Court.
 Juries were organized by Judge Fer guson in the first division of the city court yesterday.
 The case of J. H. ,McDonough vs. Bir- mingham Railway, Light and Power com pany was on trial all day. The plaintiff claims damages for being put off an East Lake car after he had paid his fare. The plaintiff alleges he was d passenger on the front car, but changed to the trailer while on the journey. The con ductor on the trailer asked plaintiff for his fare, which he refused to pay, stat ing he had already paid his fare. The defendant pleads that it is against rules of the company for a passenger to change from one car to another The case went to the jury last night.
 First Division Docket.
 The following docket is set for trial in the first division of the city court to- day:
 Margurlte l.. Thompson pro ami Vs Fasnacht & Slichter, damages; Mrs. c. C. McKaskill vs. Western Union Tele- graph company, damages; William B. Thompson vs. ftasnacht & Slichtsr, dam ages: Louisville Packing company vs. H. H. Huffstutler. assumpsit; David S. Creed vs. Birmingham Southern Railroad com pany, damages.
 In the second division of the city court yesterday judgment for $SH was rem dered for the plaintiff in the case Of J. S. Wilcox vs. E. S. Bell.
 In the case of H. l.. Cox vs. A. J. Thorn ton, a judgment was rendered for the de- fendant.
 M. B. Johnson vs. Imperial Laundry Laundry company; judgment for plaintif for $l5.
 Second Division Docket.
 The following suits were dismissed for want of prosecutions:
 Avondale vs. E. Addington two suits).
 William Rolling vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company.
 The following docket Is set for trial in the second division of the city court to- day:
 Southern Trust company Ns. Southern Railway company, appeal; J. B. Martin vs Alabama Great Southern Railroad company. certiorari: J. D. Tyson ct al.. as signees, vs. Birmingham Paint and Roof ing company. damages; Drennen x Go. NFa Gordon Co., cprtlOrarl. the AMI Publishing company vs. J. R. Bryan. ap- peal; Murray Dibrell Shoe company vs Superior Coal and Coke company, as- sumpsit; Jackson Loan company vs. Frank Townley. certiorari J. D. Drennen vs s. A. Ellis, assumpsit; John W c Neill company vs. A. R, Dearborn Co.,, as- sumpsit; King Supply company vs S. F. King, assumpsit; Chasmar-King Supply company Vs. J. P. King, assump- sit: Jenkins Lumber company vs. Mary E. Hewes ct al., assumpsit; Lewis Good man vs. A. w. Ellerson ct al., certiorari.
 In the equity division of the chancery court yesterday, Judge Nesmth rendered a decree in the case of Martha vs. J. c. Howton ct al., establishing a vendors lien on certain lands, described in the bill, and ordering a sale to satsify the lien.
 Judge H. A. Sharpe did not commence his duties as judge in the city court yes- terday as his commission had not ar- rived He will take his seat thsi morn- ing.
 Criminal Court.
 In the first division of the criminal court yesterday, the absence of J. A. Clay ton caused the case of New York Harry, charged with robbery, to be passed to