The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-10-15
wA " interest paid N on Savings &
 20 Time deposits

HHH s4 oASO ejectment; judgment for the plaintitfr for the land sued for.
 The following docket is set in tho first l division today:
 State Bank of New York vs. Phoenix Auction company ct als, assumpsit; A. s. J. Hart vs. Hattie Jenkins, ejectment; J. w. Howard vs. Hester Garner, appeal | by defendant; Monarch Pants company vs. J. Leader & Son ct al. appeal by de- fendant; c. w. Horton vs Ciarkson Ss Clark ct als.. appeal by defendants: Roda McCalla vs. Great Southern Home Indus- trial association, appeal of defendant J. ! D. Hall ys. Richard II. Fries ct al, eject- ment.
 | In the second division of the city court yesterday the case of Mary Tobler, ad- ministratrix. vs. Pioneer Mining and l Manufacturing company, was on trial and will be resumed this morning.
 The following docket Is set in the sec. I ond division today: | Lyon Hawkins vs Alabama Steel and Wire company. damages; Marie Owen Durr vs Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages Mariah Holmes vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company. damages; Hattie Hill vs. Southern Railway company, dam- ages, R. II. Gayle vs. Mayor and alder men of Birmingham, damages; w. w.. Byers vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and 1 Power company, damages; Henry F. Webb vs. Woodlawn. a municipality, h Ido municipality, damages. In the third division of the city court yesterday the case of Jack W. Williams vs the Birmingham Railway, Light and 1 Power company was on triel and con i cluded. The went to the jury % 1 o'clock.
 ] The following docket Is set In the 1 division today:
 l w. M. Wheat vs. Birmingham Rail Light and Power company, damage II. Gordon vs Highland Bakery ei damages; Annie Lee Gains vs. ImI Laundry company, damages. Andre Overnton vs. Birmingham Railway, and Power company, damages; 1 ! Todd vs Woodward Iron company. ages; Henry Moseley vs. Western 1 Telegraph company, damages; H. Rt Smith vs. Birmingham Railway, and Power company, damages; G. Daw-
 
 Power company, damages.
 chancery Court. In the chancery court yesterday the following decrees were rendered: J. G. Brittaner vs. T. R. McCarty, decree everything demurrer. Mabel Moran vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, decree sus- taining demurrer.
 W. W. Montgomery vs. R. E. Montgom- cry. registers report of market value of certain real estate submitted and ordered to lie over for one day. The following cases were dismissed: A. J. Camp vs. Annie Dallas; William M. Ham vs. Julia Moran; Alabama Steel and Wire company vs. Alexander Dun- lap; J. II. Wallace, trustee, vs. A. J. Tanner Mary Thornton vs. Honora Mans- field ct all; Esther Sheldon ys. Mayor and Aldermen of Birmingham.
 The following docket is set for today:
 Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad com pany vs. J. Lowery; the Milner & Kettig company vs Railroad Compress com press company; Moore x Handley Hard- ware company vs. Railroad Compress company; Eli Robertson ys. s. J. Brintle; James c. Whitfield vs. James M. Kennedy ct al. R. J. Lewis ct al. ys. the Mac Afee company ct all; B. F. Roden Groc- cry company Vs. the MacAfee company ct al: James M. Kennedy vs. the Bir- mingham Realty company ct al
 Criminal Court.
 The third week for the trial of non-cap- ital felonies in the first division of the criminal court began yesterday. VIII Williams and Sleepy Ed'' plead guilty of the charges against them as contained in the indictments returned by the grand jury. Williams was charged with grand larceny on three charges and Sleepy Ed'' was indicted on three charges of burglary and grand larceny. The case of Henry Armond, who was indicted on three charges of grand larceny. was passed.
 Following is the docket set for trial be- fore Judge Dan A. Greene today:
 Ed Mavey, burglary and grand larceny; John Smith, grand larceny; Nathan Cook, grand larceny; John Thomas grand lar ceny: Charlie Clements, burglary and grand larceny; Henry Joseph. larceny from a dwelling, three charges; HIrry Wiggins, three charges of larceny from a dwelling.
 New Suits Filed.
 The following suits were filed In the city court yesterday:
 (. ~ Dugger pro ami vs. Birning- ham Railway, Light and Power company Plaintiff claims s20,000 for personal in- turles alleged to have been received in a collision between cars.
 l. T. Dugger sues the same defendant for 5000 damages for alleged loss of ser vices of C. C. Dugger.
 State of Alabama ex. rel. k. H. Hagood vs. II. C. Miller Mandamus to compel the payment of certain claims against hne and forfeiture fund registered in the years 1881 to 1885, inclusive. n