Weekly Arizona journal-miner. [volume] (Prescott, Ariz.) 1903-1908, 1907-06-05
MANY CIVIL CASES SET FOR
NEXT MONTH.
(From Thursdays Daily


the setting Of cases 10 be heard dur
ing the month of June, and after an
order was issued for special venire
Of 30 trial jurors, rcturnable June 7,
an adjournment wa. taken until that
date.
by consent Of counsel the hearing Of
the cmbezzlemcnt case against ex'
Treasurer j. =. Storm. was changed
from June 10, a. previously set, 10
June Z, and the trial Of the following
civil eases. by jury, will be- commenced
June 10. to follow in the order named;
George Rohpcter vs.. George flam'
mer; Henry Brinkmeyer ". Andy
Lancer, which IL a suit for the collec-
ton Of an account, with "A cross com
plant; The Lincoln Gold Mining com
pany Va. John Kinney, a sui, lnvolv-
ing the collection Of the purchase price
OF the boiler. Kinney, who il alleged
TO have purchased the boiler, alleges
in his answer that the boiler was no
good and was sold to him under false
representations. He also sets up a
counter claim for damages; Claude
Nelson W.. D. j. Ryan, instituted by
plaintiff to collect damages for malic.
ious prosecution and false imprison.
mcnt. The ease grew out Of the ar.
rest Of Nelson ON complaint sworn to
by Ryan. on which a criminal action
was based in connection with "a dispute
over an alleged board account; Jack.
son Henderson W.. John NJ. Goodwin,
y. G. Cherry and Louis Mickey for the
collection Of damages for alleged malic.
ious trespass in connection with the
seizure Of five head Of cattle belonging
TO plaintiff while grazing in the latter
enclosure. The cattle were seized on
the grounds that there were no mothers
to them on the range, and afterwards
returned into the possession Of the
plaintiff without prosecution; J. Water.
loo Dinsdalc VS. !. W. Mines and the
journal Miner Publishing company, n
suit instituted by Dinsdale for the col
lection Of $75,00O on three counts of
$25, 900 each for alleged malicious libel;
Lovin 4 Withers w. Arizona Smelling
company.
A civil suit entitled Yavapai county
vs.. J. +. Storm, ct nj, WIS set for hear.
ing June II, by the court, without jury,
as well ns the following suits:
y. G. Friedman w. II. A. Subtle, June
10; Crown King Mines company vs..
Charles H. Brown, ct AL, June 90;
John Berric W.. Hudson Gold Mining
company, June 90; !. /. Gardner vs..
+. l.. Burns, June u; Frederick X.
Stees vs.. Sarah Stees, June 81; George
Marguerite vs.. W. J. Gilbert, d. j.
Curry, James Kellar and J. X. Lowry,
sheriff, June rs; G. G. Miller VS.. Voge
Wholesale Liquor company, ct al, June
"a; r. l.. kastner vs.. X. l.. Adams and
l James Adams, June "a; Climax Gold
company VS.. Petition for Dissolution
June "a; r. B. Carter vs.. Lee staynor,
ct AL, June 90; Roy N. Davidson vs..
Emil Lesson, doing business as the
Prescott Baking company, June %; J.
I H. Creekmur vs.. George II. Lynch,
> June 90; william Smock vs.. Arizona
{ Central Copper company, June 20;
= William Smoek Va. J. W. Norton, June
90; Charles W. Pesrsall VS.. Charles c.
. Miller, ct al, June e7 william J.
i Lemme w. the Bisbee Belle Copper
q company, June 90; +. J. woleslagle Va.
the Humboldt Commercial company
a June 20; Oliver Lopez w. William Il.
. Allen, June 20; Arizona smelling com.
y. pany w. A. Anderson, June 20; John J.
jackson Vs. =. G. Friedman, ct al, June
. 90; George Rohpeter vs.. the Crown
: King Mines company, June IS.
The eases Of l.. W. Greer w. the Dc
tave Gold Mining company, and T. G
Z Job W. the Arizona Blue Bell Copper
company, were dismissed from the cal
endar and judgment by default wa,
entered in the case Of Charles Thorle,
4 vs.. Charles W. Clark, the hearing o.
which was set for June %.
I The following cases were continue,
q for the term:
D Territory eS.rel T.. r. Senchal vs.. Co
Operative Securities company; =. How
D.. ard Skinner Va. the Lone Pine Mimi,
b company; Oscar Jennings vs.. the Eagl
4
0 CoPper'Gold Mining company; s. II
r Trengrove vs.. the White Gold MininI
T.. company; q. T. .Meany VS.. the Cas-
0 Mines company.