Pullman herald. [volume] (Pullman, W.T. [Wash.]) 1888-1989, 1907-04-20
New vi. E. Church

! liquor to a minor: and
Whereas: said Geo. Carisch was
fined $3.50 by the police Judge who
was given jurisdiction in such cases
by the recent city ordinance providing
penalty for selling liquor to a
minor and
Whereas: the plea of guilty ;"
under this ordinance is an acknowl-
edgment "that the liquor was know
ingly and wilfully sold to a minor !:
and
Whereas: Ordinance No. II of the
city of Pullman, which is now and has
been continuously in full force and
effect since the date of its passage and
publication, provides that the contract
entered into between the city and the
Iicensee becomes null and void when
such licensee fails to fulfill the con-
ditiors under which the license is
granted, one of said conditions being
that liquor shall not be sold to minors !;
therefore be it
Resolved, that we, the common
council in regular session this 18th
day of April, 1907, do hereby revoke
the license of said Geo. Carisch to sell
Intoxicating liquors in the city of Pull
man.
The motion for the adoption of the
resolution was seconded by Councilman
Duthie.
Councilman Lanning then moved
that the resolution be laid on the
table, stating in reply to Mr.. Fulmer's
question as to the reason for the mo-
tion, that "the resolution was not
brought in good faith, but simply to
harass the council, and that anyway
the Jap enjoyed by the saloon sold
the liquor, and not Mr.. Carisch him
self"
Mr.. Fulmer stated that he believed
all saloons should be treated alike,
and that council that would revoke
Mr.. Frazier's license where no viola
ton was proven, and without a hear
ing, should revoke the Carisch license
where the proprietor had pleaded
guilty to vIo1at1o1 or the raw. s'''saSss
The motion to table was carried,
Councilmen Lanning. Baker, Mcguire,
Staley and Scott voting for it, and
Conucilmen Fulmer and Duthie
against it.
Coupo;Irooo E,,1roor cold +bo+ bo
expected the resolution to meet just
such fate. but he wanted the record
to show the consistency of the council.
A motion was made that 1.-THE dog
license ordinance he enforced" five
councilmen had voted in the affirm
ative when Fulmer's name was called
and he expressed the idea that it was
an absurdity for the council to vote
to enforce law when the presence of
the law on the statute books should be
sufficient reason for its enforcement,
and that it was the duty of the mar
shall to enforce the law without spe-
citic instructions from the council.
After some discussion the mayor took
the same view of the matter, and
ruled the motion out of order.
Bills as follows were allowed and
ordered paid:
Burgan- Emerson Co. supplies, SO. As
0. A. Amos. labor, $3.50.
j. B. Hicks, labor, so.
c. o. Peterson, labor, $3.50.
Stewart lure Hdw. Co., hardware,
SIS. 10.
F. L. Cochran. labor, $22.05.
j. F. Cochran, labor, $24.45.
I. H. Waller, team work. $24.00.
Tom Crow, work on streets, ST.
Harry Young. work on streets, ST.
Edward Shafer, work on streets,
$500.
R. Lanning, work on streets, 500. SO.
R. F. Douglass, work on streets,
$5.75.
N. White, work on streets, So. 90.
WIN. Cave, work on streets, SO. Is.
Geo. Walter. stamps, $500.
w. ]. Roberts. and three ASSISTANTS,
surveying, $7.25.
]. S. Clark, stamps, $500.
9 Clark talapbOpo oaJ +io1-oE