The Birmingham age-herald. [volume] (Birmingham, Ala.) 1902-1950, 1907-03-20
RECORD OF THE COURTS.

Business in the courts Is somewhat up
set on account of the changes and alter
ations being made in the court rooms
with a view to providing accommodation
for the new judges. By April l, 1t Is
expected that matters will have been
Strengthened out and from then on work
will proceed regularly and rapidly.
Circuit Court.
In the circuit court yesterday the fol-
lowing cases were dismissed for want
of prosecution:
reander Williams VS.. c. NJ. Burkhal-
ter: City Loan and Brokerage company
vs. Washington Poole.
Osca- Shook vs. Louisville and Nash
Vile Railroad company, consent judy
ment fol- s100.
Cumberland Mills VS.. J. w. Clayton,
Judgment by default for s442.67.
A. Kantietsky VS.. Tennessee Coal Iron
and Railroad company; Judgment for the
defendant.
Circuit Court Docket.
The following docket is set in the cir
cult court today:
Birmingham Buggy company vs. Besse-
mer Livery company, detinue; Columpus
Chamblee, pro ami, VS.. Woodward iron
company, damages; Louis Chamblee VS..
Woodward Iron company damages;
Henry f. Brittle VS.. Birmingham Rail-
way, Light and Power company, dam
ages; ]. d. Evans VS.. Western Union
Telegraph company, damages
City Court.
In the first division of the city court
yesterday a judgment nil decit for sl4l9 ~
was rendered in the case of the National
Meter company VS.. North Birmingham
First Division Docket.
| The following docket is set in the first
! division of the city court today;
| Lewis Perolio vs. St. Louis and San
| Francisco Railroad company, damages
| Amanda Fisher vs. B. A. Thompson, ct
AL. etectment; stephen Hampton, admin
istrator VS.. Birmingham Railway, Light
and Power company, damages; Mrs. Mat
tie I. Conner VS.. Western Union Telegraph
company, damages.
In the second division of the city court
Yesterday a consent judgment for IVY
was rendered In the case of Max Winkler
Brokerage company VS.. st. Louis and san
Francisco Railroad company.
A consent Judgment for $2S was rem
dered in another suit between the same
parties
The case of American Jobbng asso-
citation vs. H. w. Sweet was on trial
when court adjourned.
Second Division Docket.
The following docket is set in the sec
ond division OF the city court today: B..
F. Pool VS.. DR.. E.. A. Morris, appeal; A
Latady, receiver, VS.. w. L. Terry, as
sumpsit; Nenan Ellard VS.. Mrs. j. A..
Wideman, ejectment; Kennedy state and
Cooperage company VS.. Southern Rail-
way company damages: Kennedy State
and Cooperage company VS.. Alapama
Great Southern Railroad company, dam
ages; the Clauss Shear company VS.. Ala
bama Barber Supply company, assumpsit;
Benton Brothers VS.. G. f. RolIs, GER
tiorari; Ed Haley VS.. Standard Life and
| Accident company, appeal; Thomas Car
Inns Sons company VS.. Birmingham iron
and Supply company, assumpsit; BirminS-
ham Packing company VS.. southern Kali
way company, damages; DR.. Z. NJ. Rob
inson ct al VS.. Jack w. Cole, assumpsit;
| Gilbert Carter VS.. f. c. Ratcliffe. ct al,
assumpsit: j. NJ. Ross VS.. Healing
Springs Baptist church, assumpsit.
Chancery Court.
In the chancery court yesterday in the
case of j. r. Wenn VS.. W. w. Garrett,
a decree was rendered overruling de-
murrers to bill of complaint and allowing
defendant twenty days to file an answer.
A final decree was rendered III favor
of the plaintiff in the case OF A. {. irwin
VS.. c. B. Irwin.
| In the case of d. f. Allen VS.. Della
W. Enslen, defendants motion to sup
press deposition was overruled
In the case of Wesley Short VS.. Nam
ME II. Edwards ct al, motion to strike
defendants pleas was overruled.
Town of Woodlawn vs.. NJ. r. cox,
demurrers to bill as amended, overruled;
defendant allowed twenty days TO an
| swer.
New Suits Filed.
| w. H. Ferguson VS.. Walter Hoffman
| ct al, petition to sell property for
| distribution among heirs.
| Lathrop Lumber company VS.. Ellen
Troy ct al, bill to redeem land of re-