The Garland globe. [volume] (Garland, Utah) 1906-191?, 1907-11-16
QUALITY OF MANURE.
II 10 Greatly Affected by the Manner Ia
Which u 10 Handled.

one important FACTOR is the care
given the manure before 1t is applied
to the land. The common way Of
throwing the manure out In a pile to
be tramped in the mud by the stock
and leached away by the rains is pro
ductive of great loss of plant food.
Besides, the fermentation in such a
pile is destructive of nitrogen and hui
mus. The Cornell station showed that
horse manure thrown in an unshel.
tered pile lost In six summer months
AZ per cent. of Its fertilizing elements.
The New Jersey station showed that
solid and liquid manure mixed lost by
exposure In 100 days 81 per cent Of
its nitrogen and phosphoric acid each
and 81 per cent of its potash. Such
care Is certainly wasteful and manure
kept under such conditions connot
give very large increased yields. At
the same time as the above expert
ment the Cornell station piled some
went on slowly, but the pile was not
sheltered from rain. Under such con.
dition the loss of constituents was 9.2
per cent. Another pile handled so
that It dried without fermentation lost
practically nothing. Prof. Frear Of the
Pennsylvania station showed that It
was more economical by $3.50 per
head in a period of six months to al
low the manure from fattening steers
to accumulate under them for two
months at time than 1t was to clean
the stables daily and deposit In the
ordinary way. This saving does not
consider the labor involved in haul
ing the manure. The practice of al
lowing the manure to accumulate for
a time is practicable one for loose
stock II there be plenty of bedding to
keep them clean and absorb the
liquids. The constant tramping keeps
the manure solid and fermentation
goes on slowly. However, when the
stock is taken Off, the stable should
be cleaned at once and the manure
scattered, for there is soon big loss
Of nitrogen in the form Of ammonia.
The ideal way of handling manure
Is to remove II to the field every day
and spread on the land, says the Farm
ers' Review. In this way there is
little loss by fermentation and what
substance is leached out by rain is
washed into the soil where 1t is taken
up by the roots, or is chemically
combined with other minerals in the
SOIL For this purpose there Is no
better way than the using of a manure
spreader. It will hold usually all the
cleanings for day and in some cases
the cleanings of two or three days
may be thrown into the spreader and
then hauled out. Farmers everywhere
have found the spreader an almost in.
dispensable tool.
However, 1t is not always conven.
lent to haul out and spread every day
The ground Is frequently too soft to go
on with team and wagon. and often
the field on which 1t Is wished to apply
the manure is occupied by crop
Under such conditions II becomes nee
essary to store the manure for some
time. Few farmers will go to the
expense of building a covered manure
pit with cement sides and bottom into
shN 'ifuiu anu ooiih may
be kept solid and damp, but every one
could have a concave area with ce
ment, or stiff clay, bottom, from which
drainage would not take place. Int
this the manure could be thrown In
rather deep pile, kept evenly spread
and packed down by the tramping o
loose animals or otherwise The
tramping would prevent rapid fermen
tation and the rains would keep the
pile sufficiently moist. 1t should b.,
said in this connection that an effor'
should be made to save all the liquid,
by a liberal use of bedding. The
liquids, weight for weight, are twict
as valuable as the solids. Whatever
method is resorted to for storing, the
manure should be kept solid and damp
and should be hauled to the field and
scattered as soon as possible. 1t should
be scattered at once and not be al
lowed to lie In piles for week or
even months. II should be spread
evenly over the ground and here again