The Oskaloosa herald., 1907-11-28
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
Disposition Of Various Matters by
Judge and Jury.

AN-8N S@AN~ -
After completing big days bust
ness, Judge Willcockson adjourned
the district court Friday evening until
Tuesday. Nov. 20, when the court will
take up the addition assignment which
was made yesterday. Next week will
close the work for this term of court
and an unusually large number OF
cases were necessarily continued UNI
tn next term, owing to the length OF
the trial OF the Hamilton cNeill
damage suit. The motion for new
trial in this latter case will be given
hearing some time before the close
OF the term. The assignment includes
all cases not already disposed of and
IS as follows:
Tuesday, Nov. 26 at a. m.
No. 12-Kisor VS.. Jones-Note.
No. 193-Adams VS.. Adams, Divorce.
Wednesday, Nov. 81, at 9 a. m.
No. 9S-Sapp vs.. Sapp. divorce.
No 71-Gove VS.. Crandall, note.
No. 104-Davls VS.. Pickerell ct al
injunction.
No. 175-Hahn VS.. Hahn, divorce.
No. 242-Knox vs. Knox. divorce.
No. 22S- Phelps Mtg. Co. VS.. City
OF Oskaloosa.
Friday, Nov. 20, at 8 a. m.
Phelps Mtg. Co. VS.. Lowther.
No. 10G-Brewer VS., Brewer ct al,
partition.
No. S-Estate of Jane Evans, decd.
for order.
No. 21-Estate of Joseph R. Marsh,
decd. for order.
No. 15-Estate of Isaac Whitney,
decd. final report.
Gases Continued.
The following cases were continued:
Andrew Fehd VS.. City OF oskaloosa,
T. B. Gossage ct al VS.. c. b. & Q.
Ry. Co.
Margaret Smith VS.. G. B. & Q. Ry.
Co.
Margaret Donnelly VS., C. B. & q.
Ry. Co.
Francis Perry VS.. c. B. & @. Ry. Co.
Sarah n Pardun VS., c. B. & q.
Ry. Co.
E. f. Crookham VS.. Joe H. Crook
ham.
Beamer Bros. vs.. Ed England.
Joe Douglas vs. Josephine Wilson.
In the matter of the Incorporation
OF the Town OF Burdess.
Laura Macy ct al VS.. Cynthia A.
Howerton ct al.
B. w. Wymore VS.. w. r. Evans.
p. McCrea VS.. Rose E. Jordan
ct al
Jasper Vail VS.. Eliza E. Vail ct al.
E. S, wlndahl VS.. Elmer E. Daily,
ct al.
C. J. Eller VS.. Henry Principal ct al |
C. A. Ruby VS.. P. j. Ellsworth.
A. G. McMains VS.. John MeMains.
Bartlett & King VS.. Illinois Surety
Co.
J. T. Stanley vs.. C. 7. Kisor.
Neva Carr VS.. Geo. w. Way.
Sylvester Sarvis ct al VS.. Robert
Sarvis.
Barnes G. Core VS.. Heisel & Burrier.
McCosh & Turner VS.. ]. o. Nc
Donough ct al
H. c. Homer VS.. VIM. Hayes ct al.
Harry Shaffer VS.. Ida May Rogers
ct al.
C. W. Jordan, gdn. VS.. W. H. Kirk
ct al
c. W Jordan, gdn. VS.. W. H. Kirk
ct al.
Elmer E. Gorsuch VS.. D. W. Shell
ley ct al
Western Grocer Co. VS.. Taylor Sup
ply Co.
J. M. Parsons VS.. C. H. Crabtree
ct al
s. w. Jones, admr. VS.. ]. 7. TimbreL
]. w brown VS.. David S. David.
f. L. Barnes VS.. John Love.
Daniel Caves VS.. John Jackson.
oskaloosa Saddlery' Co. VS.. Otto |
Xogeler ct al.
John P. Hiatt VS.. Neal Van LisseL
Adam Hiyely VS.. Western Union
Telegraph Co.
Alma Johnson vs. Archie E. Siders.
Lyon Bros. VS.. Leo. Hirsch ct al.
j. NJ. Fehd VS.. City of oskaloosa.
Mary E. Smith VS.. A. L. Smith ct al.
John B. De Wesse ct al, Mccoy &
Mccoy VS.. City of oskaloosa.
A. Chandler ct al VS.. Abe Roe ct al
Other Cases Disposed Of.
w. ID. Scruggs VS.. Robt. E. Sarvis
ct al in same VS.. SIddie Moore. gar
nishment and receiyership; dismissed
at plaintiffs costs.
w. w. Eby VS.. Catherine b. Brewer,
admrx., garn. in same vs.. F. B. Brew
er, punishment; dismissed at plain
tits cost
Freddie e. Rice ct al VS.. v. McBridel
ct al, partition; omit from docket-inl
supreme court.
raekman ct al, equity; motion of con-
hackman ct al, equity; motion Of con-
templated deposit TO be given par
ties Interested by pasting one notice