The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-05-02
RECORD OF THE COURTS

In the circuit court yesterday the case of W. H. MacAfee, assignee, vs. Atlanta and Birmingham Seaboard Air Line rail- way was settled, judgment for s25,0OO was rendered for the plaintiff and each side to pay its own costs
 In the first division of the city court the case of Motion McWhorter was con- cluded and went to the jury.
 In the second division of the city court verdict for the defendant was rendered in the case of Walter G. Cooper vs. Mary E. Cooper, ejectment The case of J. l.. Burns vs, E. M. Tut wiler in the third division of the city court resulted in verdict for $500.
 Arguments were commenced in the criminal court In the case of H. s. Robin 1 son, charged with the murder Of VII 1 liam J. Thompson.
 Circuit Court. In the circuit court yesterday, before Judge Lane, Judgment for $225 was rem dered in the case of Ivey Hall vs. Bir- mingham Railway Light and Power com pany.
 In the case of D. C.. Johnson vs. J. E. McCann a verdict was rendered for the defendant.
 Robert Williabs vs. Empire Flow com pany, dismissed for want of prosecution.
 NJ. II. Futile vs. Sterling A. Wood, dis missed for want of prosecution. Mary J. Rabbitte vs. Alabama Great Southern Railroad company, demurrer sustained to plaintiffs replication and plaintiff refuses to plead further.
 Circuit Court Docket.
 The following docket is set for trial today in the circuit court before Judge l Coleman
 1 H. S. Meade & Co.,, agents. vs. Bir- mingham Paint and Rofing company, ap- peal J. E. Wallenhaupt, administrator, l vs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad ! company. damages; c. B. Jennings vs. l G. F. Mcdonald, assumpsit; s. D. Den 1 nam Vs. St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad company, damages; J. and C., Lippman vs. c. F. Bell & Co.,, assump- sit
 The following docket is set in Judge Lanes division of the circuit court: l w. P. Roscoe vs. Birmingham Southern 1 Railroad company appeal; Maggie Bates vs. J. S. Gray ct al, damages; Minnie Matthews vs. J. s. Gray ct al, damages Joe Plato vs. Nick Batto. appeal Will Johnson vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company, damages.
 City Court.
 In the first division of the city court l yesterday Judge Sharpe presiding, the i case of Motion McWhorter vs. Birming- l ham Railway Light and Power company was concluded and went to the jury
 Both sides announced ready in the case of Eugene Little vs. Birmingham Rail- way, Light and Power company.
 The following docket is set in the nrst division of the city court today;
 R. L. Leatherwood ys. Orville Clark, appeal; James Mason vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company damages; Arthur w Hudgins Vs' BIT mingham Railway, Light and Power com pany, damages,
 Second City Docket.
 In the second division of the city court 1 yesterday, Judge Ferguson presiding, a verdict for the defendant was rendered in the case of Walter G. Cooper vs Mary 1 E, Cooper.
 The case of Alice Williams vs. Birming- ham Railway. Light and Power company is on trial. Plaintiff claims damages for personal injuries and injuries to horse ] and wagon.
 Second Division Docket. I The following docket is set in the sec ond division of the city court today; 1 w. ] Kline vs. Birmingham Railway i Light and Power company, damages | Carrie Mcqueen Vs. BlrM,Hsham 11ail- way. Light and Power company, dam | ages; J. D. Payne vs. Sloss-Sheffield Steel ! and Iron company, damages; Pinkie ! Baker vs. D. Brown, damages.
 Third Division--City Court. [ In the third division of the city court yesterday. Judge NesTnith presiding, a 1 verdict for $500 was rendered in the case : of J. l.. Burns vs. |. M. Tutwiler; suit | on a contract for building a house. | The cases of R. A. Blount ct al. and i A. c. Bennlngs against the Eureka Land company were dismissed for want of | prosecution.
 ]. H. Moseley vs. Alabama Penny Saw fngs and Loan company, dismissed for want of prosecution. Mrs J. J. McMahon vs. Alabama Fur niture company. on trial.
 Third Division Docket.
 The following docket is set for trial ir the third division of the city court to- | day:
 C. NJ. Shelley vs. W. R. Sutley. assump sit: A. Shugarman vs. Ruby Manley, de | tinue: the Alabama National Bank vs William Vaughan ct al, assumpsit; Ala | bama National Bank vs.,J. W. Davidson