Herald and news. [volume] (West Randolph, Vt.) 1878-1943, 1907-08-01
windsor County Con-,

Souft,
on June Term. 1907
oh Friday, all the m,or.
case being tried were dlsch.no. on Il.
term, ana on Saturday. al IN seu 70, Ii,
OF that case, the rest AZ ~ ~ eonelasios
:, sea ,., nome This week has bs s,Os Ess
20 sr'al OF court issues, ana Il ~ devoted
nhsi adjournment would NJ pa 'VoS' As 1
ufaay OF the present week NJ y Sat
ing cases We're tried last wee, " follow.
Allison w. Taft VS.. Ezra a..
iendant bought young Ws.,oa.'u' IAete
Johnson's auction, ana too,. Urn colt
a. Jew weeks later, plaintiti asked a.. loas
ant what he was going 10 ~ 10 Ia,eieAa-
colt and he said he would tat. saA u
rs ne ala not want her. p,s,..,s W. lagS
ne would take her. Defendant D el at
johnson no money, but bad N, u@ la2
ana mortgage for the coli M nOs
thereupon went TO johnson 49, \" laHs
pers were given in which PLAINTIFF NV =
was substituted for defendant. aaa'
tune OF slio. Plaintiff lei S, 70 u
nave the colt few weeks M N''u'Al
TIN claimed the defendant snoaas :. pAla
mai by hitching her 10 Ioaa Il 'ae al
not draw and making her hail., ooass
pnihtln mad to take the coli Nh y 'as
Johnson's to be re-auetioned. hv H
transaction only s7e.e0 was 49,, gaea
pialntin standing in for the d,S'.
from sllo. Defendant insisted nv ,''''sae
dent of hitching the colt to 4 bs ~ nc.
was before the plaintiff became M, "a
the animal. 1t was also shown WI
present owner OF the animal thai \. y, y
good and sound and all right. IT, ny t va
found for defendant to recover nj. i, ~! !.il
Gilbert +, Davis for plaintiff, go.0'',
skeels for defendant. ''-'' I
State VS.. Wilbur Blossom a,
woodstock. Respondent was ch..-
with selling gallon Of old ols.,
bum weaver, named Frank osso.a
and Ed. Finn, "bumn splppe,
OF them got intoxicated aud droys ~,
team into the brook, from which an ss
rescued. The occurrence was Inn ~
last. Defendant denied selling 90.
claimed the two men had the SINS ~
they came TO his house. The inv ~
out all day and late into the evening s.s
being unable to agree was discbsrpss II
q. Sargent and q. A. Davis for re,ro,s
emit; Edward r. Buck, states st,o,ns,
for state.
State VS.. Joseph Campbell. Rssno,s.
ent pleaded guilty Of stealing $40 i,a,
the trunk OF Miss Lillian Duffy, isloT
employee at the Junction. He wa, -.
fenced to the house OF correction "a, ~
less than two nor more than p, ynx
State VS.. Daniel Kelly. RESPONSE,
got drunk and was lodged in the VIII,
River Junction lookup, which he b,ok.
away from and about stole, took and a..
ried away with him. For this offence !. |
was sentenced to the house Of correction
for not less than one year nor more ths,
is months, to begin when be has con.
cluded the 80 days he was doing when !.
essayed to break away.
State VS.. Richard Welch. Respondent
was informed against for obtaining mon.
ey under false pretences from Frank
Wells of Wilder. He borrowed 800 On
the strength OF having money down
country and went away with the step
daughter OF Wells, ostensibly 10 get nsr.
ried, but the respondent has wife in
Massachusetts, from whom he bad run
away. The case was submitted to lie
probation officer to investigate and rpor
upon to see II respondent is a proper Oh
iect OF probation.
State VS.. George Potter OF Woodstock,
heretofore convicted Of two Offences Of Vi
olation OF the license law, in the Illegal
sale OF intoxicsnts, was fined $500 and
costs, amounting in all TO about 800
The last jury case TO be tried was civ
il cause-Charles Green vs.. John Priest Of
East Wallingford. The suit was tore
cover a balance alleged to be due as farm
hand for the defendant. The defendant
sought to offset losses sustained by The
negligence of plaintiff whereby three
cows and horse died and also by furn-
ishing food for relatives Of the plaintiff
who came to live with him in the house
belonging TO defendant, in which PLAIN
tiff lived with his wife. The case was
heard before justice at Ludlow ana
plaintiff there recovered s20 and costs
Defendant appealed it and the jury gave
the plaintiff verdict for $3.50, M
Priest says the end is not yet, but be VIII
have the supreme court pass upon the
matter. S. E. Emery for plaintiff; Harry
w. Hoye for defendant.