Herald and news. [volume] (West Randolph, Vt.) 1878-1943, 1907-08-08
Windsor County Court.
June Term. 1907

n1ns after session OF o3 consecutive
working days, The last week was deyot-
ed 10 the trial OF cases with issue 81 n
the eonis and the following were heard
ana disposed Of a. Indicated -
ATWOOD Sargent, admr., vs.. Fred. ".
tleree. This was Chester case aud was
70 recover sl2o rental Of farm in And
over which had been leased by one Mar.
Die for year from March /, 1904. Mar.
BILE died In June, 1904, and defendant an.
dertook TO carry out the arrangement
with Marble. Defendant claimed 10 have
understood the trade y ith Marble 10 have
been that he should care for the premises
and pay the taxes and this the defendant
ala, Moreover, defendant claimed an
agreement with plaintiff whereby the es-
tate Of Miss Helen Peabody, who owned
the harm In question, should accept the
s8l,3b In settlement, that sum being all
that defendant had left OF the Marble es-
tate, Judgment was given for the de-
PENDANT. sherwin and Buck for de
PENDANTS stiekney, Sargent a skeels for
plaintiff.
James Farrell v, the town Of Barnard.
Plaintiff sought TO recover si06. rs for
services In nursing one Nelson Howard,
poor, INDECENT person, who was sick at
the house OF Mrs. soule, where plaintiff
also lived. The claim also included items
FOR wood and oil, and meals for night
watchers. The oyerseer OF the town
claimed that the only arrangement made
IN behalf Of the town was that il should
pay for night watchers, and this had been
done, The ooul, found in favor OF the
plaintiff and gave judgment for the
amount OF his claim. Vim. Batchelder
for plaintiff; F. c. southgate and j. G.
Sargent for defendant.
Edwin ii. Slayton vs.. John ]. Kneen.
The parties live at Woodstock and the ae-
tion was to recover back ZIG paid to the
defendant for a certain Durham COW
bought OF him by the plaintiff. The
price agreed upon was sS2, half in cash
and half in fertilizer. Soon after the
COW was taken home by plaintiff, she
died Post norton showed an advanced
condition OF tuberculosis. Plaintiff said
no warranty was made by defendant, nor
did the plaintiff show any knowledge on
defendants part OF the cows condition.
SO judgment was given for defendant.
Hoye for plaintiff; southgate for defend
ant.
Albert Sykes vs.. David Carver, was
petition 10 be allowed an appeal from
judgment of justice at Weston. The
appeal was allowed with costs to the petit
TONER. II. L. skeels for Carver; 5. G.
Everts for petitioner.
Bank OF White River Junction VS.. c. NJ.
Brownell. Action to recover on three
notes Of 5000 each, given by defendant,
who lives al Burlington. There was no
defense and judgment was given the
plaintiff, for whom J. G. Harvey APP
peared.
James r. Morrison vs.. j. w. and Mar
tina L. Newton, an action to recover $500
as commission for the sale OF a farm in
Norwich, where plaintiff lives. Defend
ants are mother and son and live in Bos-
ton. They owned the farm and J. w.
Newton agreed to pay the sum named II
plaintiff negotiated the sale, which he did
to one Andrews, who paid $500 to bind
the trade. But ]. W. Newton claimed
that whatever trade was made must be
subject to the approval OF his mother and
so informed the plaintiff. When J. w.
Newton got home and talked to his
mother about the sale, she repudisted it.
So he sent back the $500 check and noti-
fed the parties the trade was OFF. Judg-
ment for defendant. Z. X. Buck for
plaintiff; Pingree, Pingree q Pingree fer
defendant.
The following divorce cases were heard
and bills granted for the causes indicat-
ed
Elmer G. Gould VS.. Eleanor Nj. Gould,
desertion. The parties lived at Hartland.
G. F. Davis for petitioner.
Eva f. Sargent vs. Clayton l. Sargent.
Petitioner lives at Rochester. Bill grant
ed for desertion. Custody of minor child
given to petitioner. G.. A. Davis, coun-
sci.
Annie p. VS.. Fred S. Lockwood. Bill
granted for intolerable severity. 5. E.
Emery for petitioner, who lives at Proc
torsville.
Minnie L. Lawrence VS.. Daniel I. Law
renee. desertion. II. H. Blanchard for
petitioner. who lives at Chester.
Elmer II. Parkhurst VS.. Elizabeth |.
desertion. E. r. Buck for pc
titioner. -
Mabel Clark VS.. wilfred Clark. Bill
granted for intolerable severity. {. T.
Tarbell for petitioner.
Effie L. Potter VS.. Erwin Potter, deser-
tion. Petitioner lives at Chester. 5. b.
Emery, counsel
Annie NJ. Edmunds VS.. Geo. W. Ed
This was a Bethel case. Blu
granted for intolerable severity. y. A.
Davis for petitioner.
Alvia V. Chamberlin VS.. Mary =.
Chamberlin, wilful desertion. u. r. La
Wis for petitioner.
Charles Atwood VS.. Josephine Atwood.
Bill granted for desertion. L. Z. Sher-
win for petitioner. r
Mark d. Carlisle VS.. Angie Ii. Carlisle,
intolerable severity. s. E. Emery for Pc
titioner. o,s =.
Warren r. Taylor, motion was MADE
TO set aside the verdict for plaintli on
the ground that the jury was preludiced,
or did not understand the case. Motion
overruled, and exceptions by defendant
The Best Of All and
~. orer aftv wears Mrs. Winslow's sootnlns
INV has been used by mothers for their chlareh
SSiIpP ,aetbinr Are you disturbed az night anu