Bismarck daily tribune. [volume] (Bismarck, Dakota [N.D.]) 1881-1916, 1907-10-15

Dean VS.. Dimmick, from Mckenzie
county. Engerud, Holt & Fraime, fol
! plaintiff and appellant; T. s. Becker
and Geo. A. Bangs, contra.
w. Monday; Oct. Fl.
Erickson VS.. Elliott, from McHeney
county. Christianson &. Weber fol
plaintiff and appellant: D. j. O. Cornell
and C. D. Donnelly, contra.
Erickson VS.. Elliott, from McHenry
county. Christainson & Weber for
plaintiff and appellant; D. J. O'Connell
and G. D. Donnelly, contra. g.
Grove vs., G. N. Loan Co., from Nc.
Henry county. Butler Lamb for
plaintiffs and appellants; Christainson
& Weber, contra. ".<.... ~
Rieck VS.. Daigle,, from Pierce coun-
ty. Christainson & Weber for plaintiff
and appellant; L. r. Nostdal, contra.
Is. Tuesday, Oct. 22nd. .,. ..
Engholm VS.. Ekrem, from Ward
county. Purcell & Divet and L. w.
Gammons, for plaintiffs and appel
lants; Bosard & Ryerson, Palda &
Burke, James johnson and D. c..
Greenleaf, contra. .= ... o.. .,..
Pendroy VS.. G. N. Ry. Co., from Nc
Henry county. Murphy & Duggan,
for defendant and appellant; D. J..
O'Connell, G. D. Donnelly and L. ].
Palda, Jr, contra.
St.. P. NJ. & M. Ry. Co. vs.. r. B.
Blakemore, defendant, and County of
Cass, intervenor. Original application
for writ of certiorari. Engerud, Holt
& Fame, for the petitioners; Murphy
& Duggan, contra.
Wednesday, Oct. 2srd.
State VS.. Murphy, from Cass county.
w. s. Lauder and Barnett & Richard
son, for defendant and appellant; the
Attorney General, contra.
State of North Dakota{ ex rel. Don
Mcdonald VS.. H. L. Holmes, as audit
or of the state Of North Dakota Or
iginal application for writ of manda-
mus. J. B. Wineman, for plaintiff:
the Attorney General, contra. NJ. 49,.
's@@ Thursday, Oct. 24sh. -
State Of North Dakota, eR rel. TT.
McCue. Attorney General. VS.. N. p.
Ry. Co. Original application for writ
of injunction. The Attorney General
for :. the plaintiff. c.. w. Bum and
Ball, Watson, Young & Hardy, contra.
State of North Dakota. OK rel T. F.
McCue, Attorney General, VS.. St. P. &
Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. Original
application for writ of Injunction. The
Attorney General, for the plaintiff;
Alfred III. Bright and Ball, Watson,
Young & Hardy, contra. g..
State of North Dakota, ex rel. T. F.
McCue, Attorney General, VS.. G. N.
Ry. Co. Original application for writ
of injunction. The Attorney General
for the plaintiff; w. R.. Begg and
Murphy & Duggan, contra.
Fulton VS.. Cretian, from Bottineau
county. Noble, Blood & Adamson, and
Ball, Watson, Young & Hardy, for de-
PENDANT and appellant; LIE Seur &
Bradford, contra. e,,..:.
Bertleson VS.. Ehr, from Ward coun-
ty. LIE sueur & Bradford, for de.
PENDANT and appellant; Joseph Demo-
yer, contra. 49, - ~ Is '~ss,- s. s
Lands Machine Co. VS.. Konantz
Saddlery Co., from Ward county. lie
sueurs& Bradford, for defendant and
appellant; Geo. H. Gjertsen, contra.
Friday, Oct. 25th.
Pratt VS.. Beiseker, from Pierce
county. Bessesen & Berry and Burke
G Middaugh, for defendants and APP
peilants; Hanchett & Wartner, contra.
Beiseker vs.. Anderson, from Wells
county. Bessesen & Berry, for plain
! tiff and appellant; Hanchett & Wart-
ner, contra. s.l
4 Kephart VS.. Continental Casulty CO.,
from Well county Geo. X. Shaw, Jr.,
for defendants and appellants: J.
Youngblood, contra. s W. s..z
4 Saturday, Oct. Goth. h. Il.
4 American Soda Fountain Co. VS..
Hogue, from Kidder county. Newton
& Dullam and C. H. Stanley, for plain
tiff and appellant; r. R. Mockler and
~. w. Walker, contra. Il
4 Mpls. st. P. & sault ste. Marie nv.
I, Go. VS.. Hans oppegard, as sheriff Of
Barnes county, from Barnes county
q Les Combs for plaintiff and appellant;
| Alfred Zuger, contra.
| Ross va. Prante. from Ransom coun
4 ty. T. A. Curtis and o. 8. Sem, fol
i plaintiffs and appellants: Rourke
/ Kyello & Adams. contra.
/ skeffington VS.. Prante. from Ransom
4 county. T. Al. Curtis, for plaintifF and
! appellant; Rourke, Kevello q Adams
4 contra. .
1 Knudson VS.. Robinson, from Mclean
county. Geo. r. Gibson and A nv