The Mena weekly star., 1907-04-11
HE SUPPLEMENTAL BILL
Relatives of Mrs. Eddy Take Ac- tion Regarding Recent Trans
 fer of Property.
THREE TRUSTEES MADE DEFENDANTS
The Compliments Charge That Alter the First BH Was Filed Defend ants Induced Mrs. Eddy to Sign Away All Her Rights in Her Estate.

Concord, N H., April LA supple mental bill in equity called forth by the recent announcement that the property of Mrs. Mary Baker G. Eddy had been transferred to three trus- tees was filed in the Merrimack county court Saturday by the original compliments or next friends, in the suit for an accounting of Mrs Eddy $ property. The supplemental bill, di- vested of legal phraseology, is as fol lows
 The petition of Mary Baker Glover Eddy, who sues, by her next friends, George w. Glover, Mary Baker Glover George w. Baker. Fred w Baker and Ebenezer ]. Foster Eddy against Calvin A. Frye Alfred Fan low. Irving c. Tomlinson, Ira Q Knapp, William E. Johnson. stephen A. Chase. Joseph Armstrong. Edward A. kimball. Hermann s. Herring, Lewis c. Strang, Henry NJ, Baker. Archibald Mcclellan and Josiah l. Fernald.
 First-The complainants say u.at on the first day of March, 1907, they filed their original bill of complaint against all the above named defend ants, except Baker, Mcclellan and Fernald, and therein stated the grounds of their action and prayed for appropriate relief and copies thereof were duly served upon the de- fendants.
 Second--The complainants say that after the filing of said bin the de- fendants induced Mrs. Eddy to trans fer all her estate to Henry M. Baker Archibald Mcclellan and Josiah E. Fernald. and that thereupon Baker, Mcclellan and Fernald proceeded to take possesson of all the estate.
 Third -The complanants charge that Baker. Mcclellan and Fernald are the agents and attorneys of the defendants in complainants' original bill and are subject to the control of said original defendants and are a part of the combination to surround the person of Mrs. Eddy, and, in con nection with the other defendants. to take charge of her property and herself and to manage the same sole ly according to their own pleasure and that they have completely sue ceeded in effecting the purpose of their combination and that there is abundant reason to believe that they and their associates have wrongfully mlsappropriated or unlawfuliy divert ed large sums of money and larger amounts of the property of Mrs Eddy.
 Fourth-The complainants say that Mrs Eddy was not competent to exc cute said deed of transfer by reason of her condition, as set forth in the original bill in equity; and that the same K device of all the defendants contrived and carried out for the purpose of enabling the defendants more surely to accomplish the wrong ful purposes Of the aforesaid combin- ation and to prevent the appoint ment of q receiver and to defeat the regular course of the original suit.
 Therefore the plaintiffs pray That their supplemental bill he made part of the original bill and that the de fcndants, Baker, Mcclellan and Fern aid. be required to appear aud make answer thereto. and also required to transfer to the receiver when ap- pointed by the court under the prayer for relief in the original bill, all the property of Mrs Eddy taken posses ion of or received by them under ta' provisions of the deed signed March z and for such further relief as the sourt may deem requisite and just