The Birmingham age-herald. [volume] (Birmingham, Ala.) 1902-1950, 1907-01-22

the following docket is set for today:
John Prator VS.. Vance Contracting COM
pany damages: Alex. Durge VS. Tennes-
see Coal Iron and Railroad company,
damages; V Paris & Co VS.. Cleveland,
Cincinnati, Chicago and st. Louis Rail
way company, damages; l.. A. Mcmahon
vs. Benton Vines, appeal; Charles S. Fox
vs.. H. l. Goldstein, appeal; Richard W.
Massey VS. John F. Gillespie, appeal;
Herman Apler VS.. Birmingham Railwa-~,
Light and Power company. appeal; Roy
Mccullough ct al, administrator, VS.. Sea-
board Air Line Railway. damages.
Second Division.
In the second division of the city court
yesterday a default judgment for sS41
was rendered for the plaintiff in the
case of j. J. Wilet VS.. John c. Forney.
In the case of Heinz and Manscaeur VS..
McGeever Furniture company, Judgment
by default for 1921 was rendered for the
plaintiffs.
II. J.. Jordan vs. Southern Railway
company, dismissed for want of prosecu-
ton
Second Division Docket.
The following docket is set for trial in
the second division of the city court to-
day:
p ]. Dufhn vs.. Savoy Laundry COM
pany, ct al, assumpsit; Ben j. Schuster
VS.. John l.. Purifoy. assumpst; e. r.
Collins VS.. NJ k Collins. garnishment;
J. D. Gresha VS.. r. f. Boatrite, assump-
sit: James Smith VS.. Mayor and City
Council of Ensley. damages; III. c. Gar
vim VS.. Brewer x Jones, assumpsit; w.
j. Gilmore VS.. American Bolt company,
trover NJ X. Collins vs.. Alabama club,
ct al assumpsit; Merchants Insurance
and Ocean company VS.. Walter Brown,
certiorari: the Mccall company VS.. B.
Zavelo, appeal Standard Stove Works
vs.. b. Zavelo, appeal; c, A. Sherson
company VS. First National bank of Biz
mingham, assumpsit; II. P. Berry VS.. VIII
liam Kiker. punishment
New Suits.
The following suits were filed in the
office of the city court yesterday:
Mrs Sallie Edwards VS.. Western Union
Telegraph company. Plaintiff claims 1899
damages for alleged negligence of the
defendant in falling to deliver telegram
within a reasonable time.
Antony Dietlin US. Louis Gelders Plain
tiff claims $1,000 damages for injury done
to his stock of goods by water leaking
from premises of which the defendant Is
owner.
Emma Hall sues Southern Steel COM
pany for $4,000. Plaintiff alleges thdt
her son, minor, was employed at the
rod mill in Ensley, and while working
there for the defendant, his arm was
caught in the machinery and amputateG
viii Edwards vs. Western Union Tele-
sranh company. Plaintiff claims 1899
damages for alleged failure to deliver a
telegram within reasonable time.
Katie A. Eggler VS.. Birmingham Belt
Railroad company. Plaintiff claims $1,000
damages and alleges that she owns a lot
ON the corner of Avenue and Tenth
street on which there is a store and two
private dwellings. and that the defend
ant operates railroad along said ave
nue. and in front of her property, inter-
fering with her business blocking the
avenue with cars and locomotives and
otherwise depreciating the value of her
property.
Criminal Court.
In the first division of the criminal
court yesterday three cases against Han
ny Haynes Were passed on account of
absent witnesses and attorney being sn-
gagged on another court.
The case of r. f. Alexander, charged
with operating gaming table, was
passed to Thursday next.
Aleen Bryant charged with assault
with intent TO murder passed to Thurs
day.
Charles E. Harrison, charged with as
sault and battery, continued on account
of illness of witnesses. The defendant is
charged with whipping pupil in the
Kimberley school,
Alan A. Little, charged with assault
with intent TO murder, was the subject OF
some legal discussion. The defendant had