The Washington herald., 1907-05-11

bell Caulngton-Iohn Z. Laskey.
No 25s. Gottenksiuy vs.. johnson. Attorneys, John
J. Brosnan-J. B. Archer.
No zl. Smith smith. Attorneys. Mcneil
& hIcNeil-Fountain Peyton
No % Lount Va LounL Attorneys. / O. II.
AlwaTd-E. c, Dutt0u, J. i. Johnson
No rs Gates vs. Gates Attorneys. William b
Rellly-John c. Foster.
Equity Court NJ. 2.
JUSTICE GOULD.
Cummisksy vs. Wsssr; pro confesso set aside.
Complainsnia solicitor, N. J. Colbert; defendants
solicitor Leo Simmons.
McAlahOn Tz C0gachicE. submitted without arg1-
ment. C5mplsiuants solicitor. ". II. Linkins.
In re lunacy Of L. Maurice Cox; reference TO
auditor
In re luaaey Of Elizabeth Wagner: rule 70 show
cause Teiurnabls Nay a
Dudley vs. Atkinson pro eonfesso ordered Com
Dlainants solicitor. c. a. kcigWtn.
II re Michael X. Campbsu Substitution q tFus-
tees ordered. ComDlainAnts solidtof. " s. Pratt
P,mphrey vs. Prout: pro oonfesso ordered and
TefeFanes 10 Albert Harper. examiner. Complain
ants SOLICITOR Barnard * Johnson.
In re lunacy Of Emily MuriocS; verdict q jug
confirmed.
Cruttenden ", cru,tendsn; surviving trustee au-
thorize6 % proceed with sale Of certain lot.
Cahin rs. Cshfl Electric typewriter Company
order q April l9 modified. ComplainantE solicitors
Tucker Kenyon defeudant's solicitoz II l.
Davis
Cahin vs. Latferry ct al; order q April Is mod
ihed Complsinaut's solioitars Tucker 4 Kenyon
defendants solicitor. II. =. Davis.
Niece ts Welch case stficEen from calendar
end defendants tine % take testimony limited 20
fifteen days C0mplaiIants solicitors. II. T. Davis
and c. a. KeiFHini DEFENDANTS s5citors, G. r.
Wilson aud. ". u Davidge-
Cooke vs. Schmidt. order for appssraace OF alb
sent defendant- Complainant's solicitor, Leon To
BRINE.
Gaige Is. FAR; bin dismissed without prejudice.
Complsinant's solicitor, i. s. Key Smith; defend
ants solicitor p. F. leighton.
EirJy ys Mc5oWan; decree modified as ger man
date and motion for leave 10 file supplemental
cross bin. Compartments solicitors. Bendheim 4
Burke: defendants sliicit1F. c. T. HsndlsF.
Knighton Vs. Beuaugi leave 10 withdraw appesr-
ancs granted and dgfendant ordered % answer IN
five days Complainant solicitor. +. S. Bailey
defendaut's solicitor z. G. Dutton.
Dulany Waggsman: receivers authorized 20
sell certain lots. Compliments solicitors, Maddox
& Galley.
In re samuel A. Ice; guardian aa litem ap-
pointed
Henson vs. Henson: sale dec7eed with james A.
Cobb and Per! " Frisby appointed trustees
bond 5000. Complainants solicitors. J. A. Cebh
and H. n. Richards0n. deferdant's solicitor. ?. W.
FTisty.
Norns 81. Ashford: ordered on Nag calendar
Camplainants solicitors. Hslam & Hslam: de-
fendaut's solicitors J. A. Butler. " d. Henry,
and Blair Them.
MouoTd rs- Brlshi substitution o uustes or
derCd- C0mplainants solicitor. a. B. Browne.
Assignments faF Monday, Mas 5, 1907:
No 20 Price e. al. vs. FriLzen et al. Attorneys
Jehords Lester-F Frizzeu.
No "a Robinson Robinson. Attorneys. Mc
Neil-Aukau.
No rs Langley vs. dAudigna ct al Attorneys
Hoehling-Hamilton & Colbert, Biruey, Tucker. Cor
don & Gordon.
No 30 Mcbride vs.. Mcbride ct Al. Attorneys
C. Carringt0n-McNcill.
No. - Magaire ct al. vs.. Burke ct al. After
neg. Keigwin-