The Washington herald., 1907-10-03
DISTRICT COURTS.
Equity Court No. I.

CHIEF JUSTICE CLABAUGH.
Washington Market Company vs. Smith; pro con
fesso granted Complainant solicitor A A. Biz
ney.
Miller Miller; exception oyerruled and auditor S
report ratified. Compliments solicitor ". A.
Johnston defendants solicitors. K. G. Donaldson
and B. W. Parker
Barbour rs. Orme; guardian ad Item appointed.
Compliments solicitors. Brsndenb,Tg & Branden-
burg; defendants s1licit5gs W. F. Mattingly and
4. Ross PERM & son.
Washington Market Company vs. Brown; pro ON
fesso ordered. Complainsuts solicitor a. 4. Birney.
Ppoleau VS.. Singleton; argued and submitted.
Confi3ainant's solicitors Ralst0n q 5ddons; defend
ants solicitors Douglas and l. B. Sheriff.
Maynard vs.. Maynard. absolute divorce granted,
with custody Of child. Compliments solicitor w.
F. williamson defendants solicitor. w. c. Bal
derston-
Angel vs.. Angel; divorce vim mat granted
Cmpainauts solicitor Isaac Hit. it.; defendant 5
solicitor O. c. Hackett-
Kressin vs. Kressin; divorce a vim. nat. granted.
Compainant's solicitor. Campbell CaTingtOn; de-
fendauts solicitor C. W. Stetson.
Padgett Va 6uter; pro confesso ordered. Com
plsinants solicitor. J. f. McNally.
Shoemaker vs.. Shoemaker auditors report oo1-
frmed CompIainants solicitors. Carlisle < Johnson.
Assignment for to-day:
No "a Smith vs.. Barber. Attorneys. Gitt!ngs &
ChambeTlin- George H. Lonar and A. 5. Worth
ingt0n.
No. q. Mcintyre vs. Mcintyre. Attorneys. Camp
bcll CsHi1gton-J. W. Davidge.
No. 81. Price ys Prce. Attorneys, J. A
Adriaans-Taylor.
No. s. Daley vs. DALEY. Attorneys. Barnard &
J0hnsou-W. r. Holloway.
Nc. g. Setter Is Buckley. Attorneys, MeTiil2t q
AmlrUse-Drcw & TAFT
Equity Court No. 2.
TTSTTCF GOTID
Howe vs.. Gray; reference TO Margaret ". Murray,
examiner Complainants solicitor, " " BRIDE
defendants solicitors, ". Il Holloway and {. J.
Kane.
Roche VS.. Roche; guardian ad ltem appointed.
Complalnant's solicitor. George Francis Williams
Bid vs. Davis. trustee appointed C0mplainant's
solicitor. c. F. BENJAMIN.
Macdonald vs. smith: pro coufesso granted Com
plsinaats solicitor. B. F. Leighton
Miller vs. Unknown heirs Of samuel Middleton
order d sale C0mplainant's solicitors. Bates War
ren and B. I. Leighton.
Whcatley rs North Penn Iron Company et al
rule On defendants retur1able October Il. Complain
ants solicitor. Il. Winship Wheatley.
Henuiug vs. HeHnLngi bill dismissed and divorce
denied appeal. bond 500. Compaiuaut's solicitors
Gordon & Gordon; DEFENDANTS solicitor, Wilton ].
Lambert
Bruce vs., Brrce; absolute divorce granted 20 com
pziuant and defendauts cross bil dismissed. Com
i'ziuaut's selections, Hmaus & Collins
Moore < Hill Hastings rule 10 snow cause
granted retUrnabie October L. Comp-ainants 50
Iicitors Lambert & Mclean
Moore & Hin vs. Carrier e. a. rule % show
cause, retUrua5ls October l. ComDlSiuant's solici
tors, Lambert & McLe4u-
Phillips vs. Parker; trustee. authorized 20 make
loan. C0mplauauts solicitors. Lambert & Mclean
Perry Us. Perry: cause ordered Calsndared- Com
plaiuaDt's solicitor r. r. Homer defendants So
hcitdr. C. I. Digs.
IL re assignment q c. Frank Hgilmau; order
authorizing sale Petitioners solicitors. l. Il David
and X. b BehTcud
Carr Carr; submitted without argument Com
painant's solicitors Leclie Fulton 4 Cox: defend
ants solicitors Douglas & Douglas
Lindsey vs.. Lindsey submitted without aTsu
meut. ComplaiuAuts solicitor, William HeurJ
White, defendants solicitor y. F. PCulr0n.
Duckett Ts Hudson; decree CycTuliug demuTeTS
CCmplainants solicitor. John Ridout; defendant
solicitors l. G. Williamson and G.. F. Emig.
Aguev vs.. Hutclinss argued and submitted. Com
plainsnt's solicitors. Charles H. Cragin and ;. T
Thomas defendants solicitors. BTanden6Urg Z
BrsndeuhurE
Assignment f1T to-day.
No B-Alah1ney vs. lockwood et al Attorneys
Emig-GUnnell.
No u-Lusty Us Lusby st al Attorneys. Ben
jamin-Ambrusg
NJ, %. Forrest rs. Forrest e al Attorneys Get
tnes & ChambeTlain-FCrreSt 60 al
No q kuabe v. Kuabe, Attorneys. RethsehilG
SCaggS