The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-10-08

1 company; Judgment by consent for $25. W. H. Terry vs. John M. Atkins judgment for $163 23.
 Diamond Power Speciality company
 vs. Town of North Birmingham; judg-
 ment for $111.93.
 The case of the Worlds Bible com pany vs. G. Caravella in on trial
 The following docket of non-jury cases is set for trial in Judge Cole mans division of the circuit court to- day:
 Rosa Starr vs. R. c. Reed, assump- sit J. II. Franklin vs. D. J. Davis, ap- peal by defendant; D. E. Smithson vs. J. M. Farrell, appeal by defendant; Riley & Silk vs. Atlanta and Birming- ham Railroad company, attachment; Ace Goodwin vs. Birmingham Railway Light and Power company, appeal by defendant; Fred Miller Brewing com pany vs. Jack Gurley, ejectment; Coal dale Brick company vs. Frank E. Elem ing. trover; J. c. Turner vs. J. T. liar well, assumpsit; Marion Brick com pany vs Industrial Finance and Trust company assumpsit; A. H. Chumley vs. II. M. Cash ct al., appeal by de- fendant; D. E. Forbes Piano company vs c. B. Powell ct all, appeal by de- fendant; Elisha Grimes vs. R. l.. Leath erwood, appeal by defendant; E.. D. Coleman vs. the Twentieth Gen. tury Mutual Aid association, appeal by defendant Starret Loan and Invest ment company vs. Ali Rider ct al, ap- IQap V L. Leatherwood ct al, appeal by de- fendant; J. H. Eubank & -Co vs. A. F. deFuniak, assumpst; T. F.-Johnson Vs Alabama State Fair and Exhibit as-
 sociation, appeal by defendant; T. F.
 Johnson vs. Alabama State Fair and Exhibit association, appeal by defend- ant. White -Blakeslee Manufacturing company vs. w. T. Kennedy, appeal by defendant; A. B. Vandegrift & Son vs. NJ. H. Fitzpatrick, appeal by defend- ant.
 In Judge Lanes division of the circuit court the case of Loveman, Joseph & Loeb vs the Peoples Home Telephone company. is oT trial and will probably | occupy the greater part of today. The plaintiffs allege the fire which occurred on their premises some time ago was due to a wire of the defendants break ing and falling across trolley wire.
 The following docket of jury cases is set for trial in Judge Lanes division of the circuit court today: G. B. McLemore vs. Rugby Land com Hpany, damages; Suburban Realty and In- yestment company vs. Sloss- Sheffield Steel company, damages; Fannie Kennedy vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; J. R. Evans vs. Andrew w. Burgin, damages; J. R.. Evans vs Tennessee Coal, Iron and Rail road company, damages. City Court.
 In the first division of the city court yesterday before Judge c. w. Ferguson and a jury, the case of John J. Gilmore vs. Louis Hart was on trial, and went to the jury at o'clock.
 The following judgments were rendered in the same court:
 Prowen Hardware company vs. Bir- mlngham Ore and Mining company, judg- ment by default for $l3S.61. S. J. Johnston vs. B. c. Garmon, judg ment by default for S74. The Wood Dickerson Lumber company vs. W. G. Harris. judgment by default for $SO4 96
 Drs Barrett and Bancroft vs. J. F.. ! Bowdon, judgment by default for s22s45. Sidney Hart vsf w. II. Barringer, judg- ment by default for land sued for and $50
 Friedman Shelby Shoe company vs. John M. Sims. judgment by default for S92 80.
 Jefferson Brick company Vs Birmng- ham Ore and Mining company judgment by default for s714.s7.
 Maben Hobson vs. Southern Express company. consent judgment for siOo. D. N. Nelson vs. Louisville and Nash vile Railroad company; judgment by con- sent for $500.
 D. M. Nelson, administrator, vs. Louis vile and Nashville Railroad company; judgment by consent for $500. | Henry S. Ogburn vs. Tennessee Ceal, Iron and Railroad company; Judgment for $50.
 Maeen Hudson vs. Southern Express company; judgment by consent for sioo.
 Marze Lawrence vs. Birmingham Rail way. Light and Power company; consent judgment for s25.
 Walter Lawrence against same defend ant; consent judgment for $425
 Margaret Lawrence against same de- fendant; consent judgment for $25. Estelle Greene against same defendant; consent judgment for $25. B. P. Ivey vs. louisville and Nashville Railroad company; consent judgment for SIP.
 The following docket is set in the first division of the city court today: T. q Adams ys l., F, Chew appeal by