The Washington herald., 1907-10-22
Supreme Court of the United States.

Present: The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Harlan
Mr. Justice Brewer ar. Justice White, Mr. Justice
Pcckham Mr.. Justice McKenna. Mr.. Justice
Holmes, AR Justice Day, and Mr. Justiee Moody.
William p Brown. Of Bellingham. Wash. Charles
Sumner L0bingier, Of Omaha Nebr.; Franklin T.
Rapp Of Washington, d. c.; James a. Walsh. Of
Helena, Mont William L. Wood, Of Kansas City
Kans. Ralph NJ. Greenlow, Of Boston Mass; b.
b. Blakeney Of Shawnee. Ind. T.; T. NJ. Hepburn
Of Spokane Wash. James H. Wcstcott, Of New
York City; Edwin c. Dutton, Of Washington ID.
G.. John Lewis johnson. Of Washington. d. c.:
Burton L. Tuttle. Of Cigcnn2.i, Ohio: Harold Tay-
lor cf indianapolis. Ind Lee Card, OF ChadTon.
Nebr; Ellsworth L. Burton, Of Parsons, Rans, !;
sam B. Kirby, Of Louisville, Ky: j. Wilmer Lati-
mer, Of Washington. d. c.; George Harbaugh Stein,
Of Philadelphia Pa. aud Province NJ. Pogne. Of
Cincinnati, Ohio, were admitted 20 practice.
No. Is. Adelaide v Tilt ct al, executors, &c.
plaintiffs in error, vs.. Otto Kelsey comptroller &c
in error 10 the Surrogates Court Of New York
County State Of New York; Judgment reversed With
costs and cause remanded for further proceedings
in conformity with the opinion Of this court Opn-
ion hy Mr.. Justice Moody. Dissenting Mr.. Justice
Harlan.
Nos Us. Hs. liz. lis. T9. 10. and lZl. Samuel
b. Raymond, county treasurer, &c, et al, ap-
peauts vs. Chicago Union Traction Company et
states for the Northern district of Illinois; decision
affirmed with costs Opinion by alr Justice Peck
ham. Dissenting Mr.. Justice Holmes and Alr.
Justice Moody
No. 3 Leonidss NJ. Lawson ct al. petitioners. vs..
United St6tes Mining Company; on wit Of ceTtiorari
10 the United States Circuit Court Of Appeals for
tie Eighth circuit degree affirmed with costs. aud
cause rtmanded 10 the Circuit Court Of the United
States for the district o. Utah. Opinion by Mr..
Justice Brewer.
Of the court:
No L. Galban & Co. appellants. vs. The United
StateE; appeal from the Court Of Claims; pcr
curian Judgment affirmed. lNealy vs. Heukel. $50
Z. s.. log. Pearcy vs.. Stranahan, G5 L. J.. 81.
aud cases cited. and sce opinion below 80 Court
ot Claims, 1851.
No s. Original Of October term. 1905. The State
Of Kansas, complainant vs.. the State Of Colorado
e al; motion for leave TO present petition for rr-
hearing denied.
Ne 20 81. - and 255 Of October term, 1896;
Charles f. Yates et al. plaintiffs IN error, vs..
the Jones National Bank. Utica Bank Thomas
Bailey. and Bank q Staplchurst; motion for leave
10 present petition for rehearing denied
No 262 Of october term. 1905. The Chapman and
Dewey Land Company plaintiffs in error. vs.. Charles
H. BiglOw e al. motion foT leave 20 present pcti-
tion for reheariug denied.
No 5s9 OF the October term. 1905 The United
states. appellant. Conrad HeinSzen & Co;
motion for leave 10 present a petition for reheaT-
ing denied
No "A Of October term 1890 James Buck, trustee
&c. plaintiff in error. ps. William +. Beach, treas
UTer &c motion for leave 10 present petition
for reheaTng denied
No. -. Original. Ex parte; In the matter Of
Thomas B. Clement petitioner motion for leave o.
file petition for wit uf mandamus denied.
No. g. Thomas Polk e al. Mutual Reserve
Fund Lite Association et al motion for wTiJ q
certioran 10 bring mp the whole record and cause
denied.
No. s. The Southern Pine Lumber Company ct
al, plaintiffs m error, and appellants vs. ". Il.
Ward ct al Ne. l0I. The Missouri VALLEY Land
Company ct al. plaintiffs in error VS., Asuus
Wicser, No l52 The Missouri VALLEY Land Com
Iany et s, plaintiffs IN error, rs. Carston WriCh
and No n. III Paso and Southern Railroad Com
ulIV. plaintiffs in error. II D. Wizard; motions
10 dismiss OF approve postponed 10 the hearing on
the merits.
No. gS Jgrib sanIerson, Sc. appellant, vs. the
United States; No. % Duluth and Superior Bridge
Company. appellant Steamer Troy &c; No.
81. Timothy y. Paddel plaintiff in error vs.. The
City ~ New York, No. 80 The Chesapeake and 1
Ohio Railway Company. plaintiffs IN error, ".
EmUl r. McCabe. Administrative. &c; and No. l2l.
The Chesapeake ana Ohio Railway Company. plain
ths in error Vs. j. " Mcdonald administrator. 1
&c motions 60 advance denied.
No. 283 William Affair. plaintiff in error. Is the
United States motion 20 advance granted and caUse
assigned Tor Wumg, m Monday October p
No ga. Consolidated Rendering COMPANY plain I
L-Ar AZ lUe 1lAlf Hi Ntlts 4tfhe
&. TUFTS attorney general. motion % advance. 4
granted and causs assigned for argument on Mon 1
day, December . next.
Ne. 2s9 frederick Loerne and another vs. Martin 4
Lawl1r 90 al motion FOR writ Of csrtioIar %
bring up the whole record and cause granted the /
record pressutCG with the motion 10 stand. the /.
return 90 the writ, and cause assigned for argu-
mcut on Monday, December 2 next aftu No ~. /
Nos. mo and Ill The Whitc-Smith Music Pub 7
fishing Company. appellant vs.. Apollo Company /.
HH.
Music Company, and Victor Herbert to file briefs
herein as amie7ls curlae granted. but motions tor .
leave 20 make oral agreement denied
No. 80 Paul J. Nogel petitioner vs. William 4
Worth BUr7en; petition for vrit of crtiarari 90 4
The Court Il Appeals Of the District II Columbia \
denied
No. 3l6. The City Of Defence. petitioner. VS.. !
William J. McGouigale receiver. &c petition for 4
writ Of certorsri 90 the United States Circuit Court
1f Appeals for the Sixth circuit denied.
No 5A William Gordon Crawford. petitioner vs.. !
The United States; petition for a writ of crtorar /
10 the Court Of Appeals q the District Of Columbia
granted.
No. sZ7 Fidelity and Casualty Company of New
YORK, Petitioner vs.. Bank q Timm0nsviile petition
0r writ Of certiCuri o. the United states Circuit
court of Appeals Tor the Fourth circuit denied
No. 58 Edward f. B0dgett, petitioner, vs. The
Portland Chemical and Phosphate Company q al
edition for writ Of cerorar TO the United State.
Circuit Ccurt Of Appeals for the Fifth circuit
No. 22g. Jerome p Porter q az. petitioners. Is.
Ionopah North Star Tmasl and Development Com
lauyi petition for writ II cIriOrad % the United
states Circuit Court Of Appeals for the Ninth cir
nit denied.
No $50 Central Railroad Companv Of New Jersey
'Wner- &c. petitioner, Eliza +. Wren e al
1ettion for a wit Of ceT1i0uri TO the United
states Circuit Court Of appeals for the second
'ircuit denied.
No 81 The Federal Contracting Company. prti-
II.
ettion foT writ Of certioran to the United states
lTcat Court of Appeals for the Second circuit
eni,d.
No. SIS r. H Wright petitioner, vs.. German
night Company a al petition fer a writ Of Ger
i0rart 10 the United States Circuit Cont If An
cals for the Fourth crclit denied
No. $50 J. l. Case Threshing Machine Companv
etitioncr, vs. The Indiana Manufacturing COMPANY ]
etitiou fer writ II certi0Tar 70 the United
,tates Circuit Court Of Appeals for the Seventh
irout granted
No. S56. Penrose McCIain. United states collector
lcr petitioner. vs. William Disstnn e al executors.
&C.; petition Tor WTlt Of certiorari to the Tuifei
tates CEcut Court Of Appeals for the Third circuit
e1iCd
no. $40 n. A. Mum ct al. petitioners. vs.. Clin-
on Reed;
No. 81 y. a. Mum ct al. petitioners Is. The
bgy Mining Company;
No. A2 y \. Mum et al, petitioners. vs.. The
5eN Mining Company and
No. 5s3 y. A. Mum et al petitioners vs Tho
eX Mining Company; petition for wrts OF certiorari
D the United States Circuit Court Of Appeals for
be Eighth circuit denied
No. 81 Security Mutual Life Insurance Comnapv
etltloneT. vs. Frederick L. MichGelsen; petition for
writ o. cerIorari 10 the United States Crruif
oUrt Of Appeals for the Third circuit denied
No. ~ George q. Ware. petitioner vs. The
nied states; petition for a writ Of eertiorari to
be United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the
ighth circuit denied.
No 453 The HsIfiuora and Oiti, U,,r-,.1 o. !
any, petitioner, vs., james y. McCuue: petition for
VIII Of eeftlorari 20 the United States Circrlit
omt Of Appeals for the Third circuit denied
No 80. Weems Steamboat Company of Raltimore | :
ity. petitioner. Peoples Steamboat Comranv
al petition for writ of certiorari 10 he Tinted
tates Circuit Court Of Appeals for the Fourth .
rcuit granted.
No ass. Milo II. Osborn petitioner. vs. The ,