The Washington herald., 1907-03-12
DAILY COURT RECORD.
supremc Court of the United states

Supreme Court of the United States.
Present: The Chief Justice Mr. Justice Harlan
Mr. Justice Brewer Mr. Justice White. AlT. Justice
Peckham NJ. Justice McKcnna. Afr Justice
Holmes. Mr. Justice Day aud Mr.. Jnsties Moody.
+. Walter BfaHdenhurg Of Washington. ID g;
George Bryan Of Richmond Va; Sanford Robinson
Of New York City: A. Z. Siallings of DAVIS. ".
Va; Forrest w Brown, Of CharlestoNn, " Va;
John Ii. Ballinger, of Seattle, Wash; James g.
Wilson q Portland Oreg William D. Allison, Of
Seattle Wash. and George =. Wallace, Of III Paso,
Tex, admitted 10 practice.
No. lH. Berton o. Wetmore, administrator. &c-'
plaintiff IN error vs.. James L. karTiek; in error 10
the Court Of Appeals Of the District # Columbia;
Judgment affirmed, with costs Opinion BY Mr. jus
tice Day CAir. Justice Brewer took no part IN the
cOnsideration and decision Of this cassl
No. i90 Thomas T. Martin, plaintiff 10 eTror IS,
The District q Columbia. and
No 49, Clarence A. Brandeubgrg. plaintiff in error.
The District uf Columbia in ei1Ur 20 the Court
Of Appeals of the District q Columbia, judgments
reversed, with costs and causes rcmRnded with dl-
rectons % reverse the judgments of the supreme
Court Of the District u Columbia and remand the
causes to that court with directions 70 quash the
assessments Opinion by Mr. Justice Holmes tMr.
Justice Harlan Mr Justice White. and Sir. JUSTICE
McKcnna concur in the judgmentsl
No. l52 Northern Pacific Railway Company ct
al. Plaintiffs in error Jacob Slagat; Ia error 20
the supreme Court q the state a Washington
Judgment affirmed. with costs. Opinion hy Alr.
Justice McKenna. (AlF. Justice Brewer took no
part IN the decision 0f this case.l
No. i53, Northere Pacific Railway Company e.
al. plaintiffs in tror IS Margaret A. Slaghti IN
error 90 the supreme Court Of the State of Wash
ngton; Judgment affirmed. with costs Opinion by
Mr. Justice McKeHna. lAlr Justice Brewer took
no part in the decision Of this casel
No. IS5 The United States appellant vs. The
Bethlehem Steel Company appeal from the Court
q Claims Judgment reversed and cause TeHianded
with directions 20 dismiss the petition, OIniGu
b. Mr. Justice Peckham-
No. H9 Jay Delamater plaintiff IN eT0r. vs.
The State Of South Dakota; IN enron 20 the su-
irene Court 4 the State Of South Dakota ludg-
ment affirmed. with costs. Opinion b. Alr. Justice
White Dissenting: Mr.. Chief Justice Fuller.
No i0j YukO PcTOyiCl plaintiff IN error, IS
The United States; In error 20 the District Court
Of the United States for the Third division Of
Alaska; judgment affirmed. Opinion by Mr. Justice
Brewer
The Chief Justice announced the followiug orders
Of the court.
80 @i o. v lawson. plaintiff in eT0r vs.
The state Of Washington; in erUr 10 the Supreme
Court q the State u Washington; dismissed for
the want If jurisdiction. Deaf vs. West Virginia.
I2s 4. s., ia; California Powder Works vs.. Davis.
ISL T. s. 39: SayWar1 vs. Denny. 155 L. 5, $50
Ausbro IS. United Stsles. 80 e. S. $50.
No Il TTOcup.a Cara Be Yillereal et al, plain
tiTs IN eTTor vs.. The State q Texas; IN error
to the Court q Ciy Appeals f0r the Third supreme
judicial district Of the State Of Texas. dismissed
l2 L. s.. 51I; Bacon vs. Texas. l65 I. >, Zls;
California Powder Works Davis. Isl L. =, 559:
DeTiue vs.. Los Angeles. E2 L. >. 3l5. 557-
No 20 The Arkansas Southern Railroad Com
paHy ct al. plaintiffs IN error IS. The German Ma
ti0ual Bank; motion to dismiss postponed 10 the
hearing ~ the cause it, merits
No 55s. Continental Paper Bag Company. pe-
titoner vs.. Eastern Paper Bag Company; peti-
tion for a writ ~ certl0rsu 90 the United states
Circuit Court oi Appeals for Tie Fist circuit
granted
No 5s8 Illinois Central Railroad Company Ct
al. appellants. ~. Interstate Commerce Commits
sion. motion 20 advance granted and cause as
signed for argument on 111Eday April .
No SOL Southern Railway Company ei al sp
pellants. Is. Il II. Tit 5t al motion 90 advance
granted and cause assigned for argument on Mon
day. ArFil p after the case already set down for
| that dsy.
No. s52 T. N. Angle. petitioner. rs The United
States petition for a writ Of certlorar 10 the
/ United States Circuit Court u Appeals for the
/ Fourth circuit denied
No. GA Frederick ". Ward petitioner. vs. John
r. Hart trustee. ct al; petition for wut Of Ger
/ ti0raIl 20 the United States Circuit Court Of Ap
/ peais fc- tbe Fourth circuit denied
/ No. fG LuiG Gaudald q a.. petitioners. vs.
Alfredo Z. Sisgert. surviving partner, &c.; PEN
/ ton Cor writ of ccTti0TaTi % tile United S.ate
Circuit Court Of Appeals for the Second circuit de
/ MED
/ No so The Mobile, Jackson and Kansas City
/ Railroad Company % a.. plaintiffs in error. vS
/ The STATE of Nssis=irpj e. al: motion % vac4tS
/ suTersegieas submitted by Ar. r. Y. Fletcher ir
/ support - E-7tiou and by Air. William Hepburn
I Russell and Mr.. Edward Nayss Iu opposition
/ thereto, with leave 10 counsel for defendants M
/ error % fle repy brief within fsc DAYS.
/ No. 6J7. The Mcrchagts National Bank. n Bal
/ tiu0re. appellant ys. The United States, motion
/ to advance submitted by NJ James Il. Hayden fl
I appellant
/ No gs. Maggie Myers. appellant. vs. Andres P
Nym0re late sheriff. &c. % ai molten % advsHc'
( submitted ly Mr. W. b. q. BroEu ;n behalf q
/ counsel for che appallees-
] No sl0 Rutucky pistiill-irs and Warehous
/ Company. pgriti0Her " J. J. Blantoa. assignee
Sc. gt al; petition for a art q csrticrsri 90 N,
/ United States Circuit Court Cf Appeals for thr
Sixth circuit submitted hy Mr.. q. r. Patterson ~
/ behalf # Alr William Marshall BGiltt Ar- Lev
/ MAYER and AI7 Alfred $. Austrian far the peti
/ ti0ner. ard ty NJ Heha Bruce for thc respondents
/ No 90. Thomas !. shea, petitioner vs.. City O.
i Mobile, petition for a writ of cCrticrau f0 th
I United States Circuit Court of Appeals for th
tifth circuit submitted bg tir. Harm T. smith auC
1 AIr. Grcgory I. Smith for Che petitioners
] No CO. Ls1is ". Douucs, petitioner. rs. TIT
/ TCtcr-Heury Development Company petition FOR
writ q csri1rari J0 the United States Circuit C0ur
1 r Appeals for the Third circuit submitted hy Nr
Z Pdlip Naur0 and Mr.. Reeve Lewis for the ue
ttioneT and by Nj HCuy +. Evcrding for th
respondent
No. 25i North Shore Boom aud Driving Com
1 pary plaintiff ga error. vs.. Nicomer Boom Company
/ Washington. dismissed with costs. on motion a
/ Nr. 5. H. Piles for lhe plaintiffs in error.
/ No 81 Convent al 81 Rose. petitioner Us. tn
I Uuited states Savings and Loan Company, Tru
tiou f0r a writ Of carti1rari tp the United State
Circuit Court Of Appeals for tie Ninth circt. sUt
. mitted by Mr.. Charles ~. Needham for the pcti
| tioncr and by AlE C0rsiu $ Shank for the re
/ spondeut.
No 2is. samuel H. Leathe. plaintiff IN error
| vs.. Edward I. Thomas; death Of plaintiff in emo
I suggested. and case passed Temporarily on motion @
/ Nj. Charles +. Wilson. IN behalf Il counsel 70
plaintiff in error.
No 80. Charles f. Yates ct al plaintiffs ii
| erro., Jones National Rank,
/ No. 81. Charles +. Yates ct al plaintiffs j
euor. vs. Utica Bank;
No. ~ Charles f. Yates et AL plaintiffs II
error. ys. Thomas BAILEY; and
No. % Charles T. Yates @ al plaintiffs j
[ error. Bank Of Staplehurst. argument conclude
by Mr.. j. W. Deweose for the plaintiffs IN error
No. :. Original Commonwealth of Virginia. CON
ulaiuant. rs. State Of West Virginia. Three hour
allowed 70 each side in the argument on Gemurs
on motion Of Hr. William A. Anderson for ia
complainant; argument commenced hy Mr. Charlie
F. Hosg in support of demurrer and continued b
AR Holmes Conrad in opposition thereto.
Adjourned until tomorrow at u O'Clock.
The dsy call sor Tuesday. March T. viii be as f0
lows: No :. Original, Ss5 234, 2p 2i2, oi3, 2H "a
55s. aud ~.
DISTRICT COURTS.
COurt oF AuneGIs