Amador ledger., 1907-05-17
Notice.

In the Superior Court of the county
of Amador, state of California.
Charles M. Belshaw, Marietta Wal
lace, Geo. e. Wallace and Walter
Morgan. plaintiffs, vs.. Bunker Hill
Consolidated Mining Company, a
corporation, defendant.
Pursuant to an order of the superior
court above named, duly given and
made in the above entitled matter,
Notice is hereby given that there is
pending in and before the above
named court, the above entitled
action, and the name of the parties
thereto are as set forth hereinabove.
and that said action is brought
against the above named defendant,
Bunker Hill Consolidated Mining
Company, corporation, to obtain
order and Judgment of said court can
ceiling the destroyed certificates of
stock heretofore issued by said cor
poration to the persons and stock
holders OF said corporation, IN the
number of shares each respectively
as follows, to wit: Charles NJ. Bel
shaw, five hundred shares: Charles
M. Belshaw, five hundred shares,
Marietta b. Wallace. five hundred
shares; Geo. 4. Wallace, five hun
dred shares, and Water Morgan, six
hundred shares, the certificate num-
Der of said certificates so issued each
respectively being unknown to
plaintiffs or defendant, except the
certificate number of said shares of
Charles M. Belshaw, which are, re
spectively, certificates numbered All
and 4l2; and directing said corpora
tion to issue to said plaintiffs, said
stockholders, new and duplicate
certificate of stock of said corpora
ton. IN lieu of the certificates
uf stock so destroyed. representing
the amount of shares of the capital
stock OF said corporation to each
respectively, as above set forth;
And all persons claiming said shares,
or any of them, or any interest or
lien therein OF thereupon, are notified
to be and appear before the above
named court at the court room there
of, in the Court House of said ANA
dor county, in the city of jackson,
California, on the 10th day of June,
1907, at the hour of ten O'Clock a. ID.
of said day, then and there to show
cause why new certificates should
not be directed to be issued to the
plaintiffs each respectively in lien of
the certificates burned aud destroyed,
belonging to each respectively, as is
set forth in said complaint, and to
set forth their rights in or claim to
such shares. or any of them, and if
no one appears within the time, and
before the time designated in such
notice, and before said 10th day of
June, nor within the time allowed by
law for the service of summons, the
court will proceed to hear such evil
dence as may be offered in support
of the allegations of the complaint,
and will thereupon make and file its
decision herein, and if the evidence
offered in support of the allegations
in the complaint be sufficient. said
court will enter its judgment, cancelI
ing said destroyed certificates of stock
so held by plaintiffs herein, and
directing said corporation defendant,
upon payment to it of all costs in
Cured by it III the premises, and
without costs against said corpora
tion, to issue to each of said plaintiffs
a new and duplicate certificate in
place of the certificate owned by
plaintiffs each respectively on the
18th day of April, 1906, and then de-
stroyed.
Witness my hand and the seal of
said Superior Court, this 2lst day of
April, A. ID. 1907.
(Seal.) j. X. HUBERTY, clerk.
John F. Davis, Attorney for Plain
titfs.