Warren sheaf. [volume] (Warren, Marshall County, Minn.) 1880-current, 1907-01-10

local assesseaa ,aad bsssl9(as s1dds p1ssaaa
rides 10 fac4g62 1ko t1s,aaenes q
tho Au6ss o4 sssssssrs ~ etihs5wass
all arsaa IN no wsrk e sss4ng s0RA
ead uuib1pru asssss0sst1. SDssoaaay
inpsRtant ssrv4ss ssa 30 rendered by
the yFspsss& gtsts ssnnfSsion u Sec
ING akat the W hws neAs b. thts leg
Hi1tuFe are safoTssA stsss1ay, MI
1sr11ay 1ad sMDspsaa1y sd thG* a.
sess0sRts aRe rec ken 0seRtMiaar
tsa % bstwvsa ssndss. lseal asssss-
ns1t 6tSkises end A1sFsn< parcels Of
prsDsrty IN The saAs district.
Cur condition IL different from that
Of many ether states and laws which
might obtain IN other states might not
be wise in HiaAssota. While We are
largely Agricultural, and like indus
trial conditions obtain moro or less
uniformly througheut 4 large portion
Of cur domain, we have in Northern
Minnesota the exceptional condition
Of vast and rapidly developed min
ing industry, which bring into the
question of taxation conditions which
were entirely foreign quarter of a
century ago. On tho iron ranges in
the northoastsrn portion of our state
We have developed great mining enter
prises which probably do not now bear
their Just proportion Of the taxes of
the state.
Taxation Of Iron Mines.
Prior to 1895 tho owners of iron
mines in Minnesota paid nominal tax
of / cent per ton on ore mined and
shipped in lieu Of all other taxes The
law, that Of 1881, was clearly uncon-
stitutfonal at that time and was re-
psaled in 1897. Under this act, dur
ing the five years ending with 1895,
the tonnage taxes on Minnesota iron
mines netted total of only S79,845.
Beginning with 1896 tho mines have
been assessed az other real property
for direct taxation; the totals for St.
Louis county, as squalized by the
state board of equalization, being, for
the past ten years. approximately as
follows: $3,9o0,00O in 1895; $4,000, 1000
in 1893, $16,oo0.Oo0 in 1900, ss0,0OO,-
900 in 1902, $42,0O0,00O in 1904 and
$70,000.o00 in 1906
How inadequate oven tho assess
ment of 1906 may be il apparent from
tho estimates OF tho companies them
selves who held the mining properties
as assets for capitalization. In 1902,
when tho United States Steel corpora
tion had much smaller iron ore hold
ings than at present, tho officers testi-
fed in a chancery suit, as appears in
a government report. that the corpora
ton had in reserve In deposits OF test
ed ore upwards of 700,O0O,OO0 tons,
upon which the officials placed a value
Of 81 per ton as the worth Of the ore
to tho company as material for con-
version into merchantable products.
Subsequent reports of the corporation
and public statements of it's recent
president, Charles M. Schwab, confirm
this valuation and show, moreover,
that the great bulk Of this iron ore
asset of the United States Steel cor.
poration is located in Minnesota.
Iron Ore Royalty Tax.
Under the new constitutional amend
ment it is within your power, as it is
your duty, to provide some system of
taxation which will give the state at
least an approximately fair share Of
ire inst rovopuo ipoo,,oo froro $bio
great iron ore wealth. One step in the
right direction, it occurs to me, would
be an income tax on the royalties or
mineral rights, which are not now list
ed for taxation
An income tax of per cent on tho
$6.500,00O Of royalties estimated to
have been received by feeholders Of
Minnesota iron lands during the year
1906 would net the state treasury
1926, 900, or a 10 per cent tax would
net $650,000.
This tax on mine royalties, however,
would not reach the large feeholders,
like the United States Steel corpora
ton, who operate their own fee prop
critics. The royalty enjoyed from the
use of such properties operated by the
holding company is as great as from
the leased properties and the tax
should reach if: possible such royalty
values as well as the royalties based
on lease
The problem in such case would be
to devise method of arriving at or
discovering fair and just measure Of
such royalty values. Inasmuch as the
tonnage of ore shipped is the basis for
computing the royalties on leased
properties it is possible that you may
be able to devise practicable and
lawful method of computing royalty
taxes, using tonnage as the basis Of
computation.
Royalty Taxes to Go to State.
A royalty tax were the total thereof
equivalent to cents per ton on the
present tonnage of 25,0OO0OO tons
shipped from Minnesota mines in 1906,
would net s1,250,000, or somewhat ex-
coed the present tax revenue derived
from direct taxation of tangible prop