The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-05-15
RECORD OF THE COURTS,

All the courts were actively engaged yesterday. but no case of any partic- ular importance was on trial.
 In Judge Coleman's division of the cir cult court the jury in the case of P. c. Burton vs. Louisville and Nashville Rail road company returned a verdict for $. The plaintiff claimed damages for being carried beyond his station, distance of one mile, and getting a severe wetting while returning.
 The case of J. C. Morris vs. Southern railway is on trial.
 In Judge Lanes division of the circuit court the case of D. c. Wolf vs. R. D.. Smith is on trial
 Circuit Court Docket.
 The following docket Is set in Judge Coleman's division of the circuit court today: W. H. and J. H. Woodward exec utors vs. Robert Stevens, damages; Allen Mims vs. William -j. Moore damages; J. R. Adams vs. J. l.. Lockwood assumpsit; A. T. Mehaffey vs. Drennen & Co.,, dam ages Louis Cocciola vs. Southern Co., Operative Home Purchasing company, as- sumpsit
  Lanes division of the circuit court to- day:
 G. H. Smith vs Mrs. F. J. Wiggins, appeal, White Blakeslee Manufacturing company vs. James E. Deadman; de- tinue: Fora McMahon vs. Charles A Has sen appeal; Union Lumber company vs. C. A. Cefalu. ct al, assumpsit; Lee J. Barx vs. Hanley, Lamar & Co.,, assump- sit.
 City Court. In the first division of the city court yesterday in the case of T. A. Gates vs. Anna G. Ferguson. ct al. verdict was returned for the defendant. The case of John l.. Burns vs. E. M. Tutwiler, ct al, was on trial and con cluded The case was given to the jury as court adjourned. First Dision Docket. The following docket Is set in the first division of the city court today: F. Cali vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; Lizzie 1 Leisic vs. Birmingham Railway. Light i and Power company, damages; James w. | Cordell pro ami vs. Birmingham Rail- way, Light and Power company, dam | ages; R. A. Jones vs. Dave Williamson, damages: Lewis Johnson vs. Birmingham Railway. Light and Power company, damages; D. R. King, administrator, vs. Ferguson & Mcdowell, damages.
 Second City Division. | In the second division of the city court yesterday, after the case of Baker, Still u,all Q, Hart vS Huffman 8, McNaaI ba5 gone to trial, a settlement was reached, in which judgment for $75 was rendered for the plaintiff.
 | Lila Wallace vs. Central of Georgia | judgment for $27 50 Ferdenand Ferrer vs. Emil Lesser; con- sent judgment for $12O0. Frank Collins vs. Culpepper Exum; settled and dismissed.
 Edmund c. Brown vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company; dis missed.
 Giles Kendrck vs. Birmingham Belt Railroad company; on trial.
 Second Division Docket.
 The following docket is set in the second division of the city court today: L. D. Mabry vs. Beggs Pipe and Foun- dry company, damages; J. R. IIolcomb vs. Birmingham Railway Light and Power company, damages; R. Hh Davis vs. Republic Iron and Steel company, damages; Calvin w. Glass vs. Alabama Great Southern Railroad company. dam ages Tom Adams vs. Lacy Buck Coal and Iron company damages; Marshall Lewis vs Republic Iron and Steel company, damages.
 Third Division-city Court. In the third division or the city court yesterday in the case of sSquire Thomas Vail vs. Alabama Great Southern Railroad company a verdict was returned for S1oo The case of Mary A. Cutliff vs. Bir- | mingham Railway, Light and Power con- | pany was settled and dismissed. Freddie Kendrick. pro ami. vs. Jefferson | county. dismissed by plaintiff. R. II. Elliott, administrator, vs. sloss- | Sheffield Steel and Iron company, dis 1 missed by plaintiff J. K. Baylss vs Birmingham Railway