Herald and news. [volume] (West Randolph, Vt.) 1878-1943, 1907-01-31
Windsor County Court.

The December term will no doubt adj
iourn without date tomorrow, as the
business is about concluded, Inc feeeh,
law making change IN the system mas
given the court more business 10 90 III
the close OF the term, IN the way =,
irving eases that might otherwise nave
sone 10 a referee or auditor; several such
cases have been heard by the court iasl
week aud this.
The follow ing cases were tried by the
court aud disposed OF as Indicated
Estate OF serena IA. Church vs.. estate
az Whileombe Ii. Church. This was an
appeal from commissioners and Is an
action to recover about silo0 represented
| by certain notes signed BY Mhlleomoe II.
| Church in his lifetime, IN favor OF Daniel
Knight, father OF Serena H. Chareh,
wife OF MhiIeombe. These notes were
given by Daniel knight 10 his daughter,
4 serena; she By her will gave the Income
on said notes 90 her husband, after her
deeease. The husband failed TO make
/ any endorsement OF interest on the notes,
and he lived more than six years after
the death Ot his wife, so that when he
/ died the not 5 we're left outstanding with
no endorsement OF interest. so II Is
claimed by the defendant estate that the
notes are outlawed, aud that IS the ques-
/ tion in the case. pingree a Plngree Tor
plaintiff; William Batehelder for defend
ant,
These divorce causes were heard and
disposed OF as Indicated
/ Joseph L. Moves vs.. Mary A. Noyes.
+ The petitioner lives at Cayend sh ana
was married over 40 years ago. His wife
/ said she guessed as the children were
grown up and away she would nct live
on farm any longer, so she departed.
/ Bill granted for desertion. ;. +. Emery
/ for petitioner.
! Nellie A. Armstrong VS.. Frank Il. ARM
/ strong. The parties 1--we at Norwich and
were married In 1876. Bill was granted
| for intolerable severity; custody OF minor
4 child given 10 the wife. Enright 4 Buck
/ for petitioner; J. q. Harvey tor defendant.
] Harley j. Currier vs.. Bertha Carrier.
| The petitioner lives at White River june
ton and was married TO defendant in
July, 1889. Four years later she left her
! husband, and a bill was granted on the
ground Of desertion. William Batchelder
for defendant.
Lena l.. Flanders vs.. John X. Flanders.
| Petitioner lives at Bridgewater, ana was
married to defendant IN October, 1900.
Bill was granted for intolerable severity.
William Batehelder for petitioner.
Eva NJ. Weeden VS.. Willard Weeden.
The parties live at Windsor, ana the
cause alleged was intolerable severity, one
feature of which was the alleged atten-
tons OF defendant to other women and
attempted attention to sisters OF the petit
toner. The case was hotly contested, and
every allegation on either side was denied
by the otter. The case is with the court.
Enright 4 Buck for the petitioner; Davis
Il Davis for defendant.
Herbert T.. kidder VS.. Mary Kidder.
The petitioner lives at Cavendish, and was
married in November, 1888. Defendant
was frequently admonished by her hus-
band as to her improprieties with other
men. Finally her conduct became so
fragrant that petitioner gave her the
choice of going away, or he would go.
She went. Bill granted for adultery, j.
q. Sargent for petitioner.
Fremont H. Wilson VS.. Carry b. Wilson.
Petitioner lives at Reading; cause alleged
desertion. Davis 4 Davis for petitioner.
Frank 5. Coburn VS.. LottIe l.. Coburn.
The petitioner lives at Weston; his wife Is
at Brattleboro, where also is one Davis,
with whom she is infatuated, and has been
with for several years. Bill granted for
desertion. A. L. Cudworth for petitioner.
Winfred A. Edison VS.. Minute l.. Edison.
Petitioner lives at Sharon. In October,
1899, he met defendant, who had a little
child. He made no enquiries, but married
| nv aiAtA a lhuhNu soon
after she left him, saying she was going to
, her husband. Petitioner and his counsel
have been unable TO trace her or her "hus-
band" Case is with the court. {. p.
Tarbell for petitioner.
Daisy Il. Gee VS.. Allen II. Gee. Petit
TONER lives at Ludlow, and was married
| in October, 1896. Defendant has failed to
= support her. Bill granted on that ground
j. q. Sargent for petitioner.
Edna V. Sumner VS.. VIM. H. II. Sumner,
l he case was from Ludlow, and bill was
granted for neglect and refusal to support,
which has existed nearly forty years. j.
T.. Sargent for petitioner.
Estha w. Wetmore vs.. Ellen f. Wet
more. Petitioner resides at Hartford, and
was married in Roxbury in June, 1901.
lie is IN every way good man and a good
citizen, his only weak spot being his fool
lsh affection for worthless woman, the
defendant, whom the evidence showed to
) be bad lot. Bill granted for desertion
James G. Harvey for petitioner
Estella NJ Shepard VS.. Arthur Shepard.
The parties were married at Boston in
June, 1890 Petitioner was very sick and
had to undergo operations. Her condi-
ton was brought about by her husbands
condition, and that was the result OF his
own criminalities. Bill granted for adul-
terry. Herbert II. Blanchard for peti-
E toner.