The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-06-17
RECORD OF THE COURTS.

Juries will be organized in the circuit, first division of the city and first division of the criminal courts today.
 In Judge Lanes division of the circuit court the case of Laura Enslen, admin istratrx vs. Birmingham Railway Light and Power company is set special for to- day. This case has been tried several times before and has been to the supreme court.
 The regular docket In the third and fourth divisions of the city court were fin- ished last Friday. Judge Senn and Judge Nesmith will devote the rest of the term to the disposal of several minor matters The regular docket in the first and sec ond divisions will conclude on Thursday
 The non-capital felony docket will be on trial in the first division of the crim- inal court before Judge Weaver and Judge Dan A. Greene will preside in the second division during the week,
 Circuit Court Dockets.
 The following docket is set in Judge Lane's division of the circuit court to- day:
 Mrs. Laura C. Enslen, administratrix vs
  company, damages; l.. w. Kelly & Co., ys. Moran & McCabe, assumpsit! Mary Ross vs. A. II. French, ejectment; Steiner Brothers Vs. r. c. Bowman, assumpslt, Janeway & Carpenter vs. Fred Wehase ct al., assumpsit; Julian Anthony Vs. BIT mingham Railway, Light and Power com pany, damages William M. Bagley ct al. ys. Alex Frew, ST. ct al, ejectment; Rob- ert Taylor vs. Kate Shorter, assumpsit; Stedman Hosey, administrator vs. Bes- senoer Machine and Foundry company, damages; Cox Brothers vs. Charles N. Caraway, assumpsit.
 The following docket Is set In Judge Coleman's division of the circuit court to- day:
 s. l. Morgan vs. Birmingham Water Works company damages; Mrs M. H. Johnson vs. Ed K. Smith, assumpsit; Fox Hayes Construction company vs. Ineo. Pouell & Co.,, damages; Shugart & Bell vs. Ned Jones ct all, ejectment; John Il. Warner vs. Louisville and Nashville Haii- road company damages; J. T. Hardin Vs. T. L. Lavender ct al, damages; Mrs. Annie Lou Bealle vs W. H. Walker. as- sumpsit; Henrietta Jordan vs. Southern Railway company, damages; s. c. Doug las vs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad company, damages; the Warrant Ware house company vs. H. I. Goldstein, as- sumpsit.
 First City Docket-Jury.
 Joseph Trommel. Jr. vs. Central of Geor- gia Railway company, damages; Henry c. Pool vs. Mayor and Aldermen of Birmins- ham, damages; Wash Barnes vs. Blr- mingham Southern Railroad company. damages; Stowers Furniture company vs. E. c. Hewes. assumpsit; Mamie Smith, pro ami vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company. damages; c. J. Frederick vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; Harriet Holland vs. Julius Marx ct al.. damages; D. M. Griswold vs. Frank Jackson, ap- peal; Lucy Palmer vs. Central Coal com pany damages; J. J. Judge vs. Mayor and
 Second Division Docket.
 The following docket is set in the sec ond division of the city court today:
 w. II. Hallock vs. H. J. Howard, at- tachment; Sloss- Sheffield Steel and Iron company vs. F. w. Fucker ct al. as- sumpsit; W. M. Little vs. Morris Devel- opment and Improvement company ct al., daniages Beman Automatic oil Can com pany vs Prosch Brothers. appeal; Flu banks & Co. vs. Nick Crones. appeal; G. NJ Iovejoy ct al. vs. M. c. Ragsdale, as- sumpslt; Wimbery & Thomas Hardware company vs Jennie Rountree assumpsit; George S. Brown vs. w. F. Johnson ct al.. attachment; II. w. Savage vs. Louisville and. Nashville Railroad company. appeal; J. A. Heron vs. Collins Grocery com pany appeal United Electric company I.iouor company vs. P. P. Summerall ct al, assumpslt; W. B. Fitzgerald vs. w. E. Perryman & co. /assumpsit; A. W.