The Washington herald., 1907-10-15
Circuit Court No. L.
JUSTICE WRIGHT

JUSTICE WRIGHT
Purdy. administrator, vs. Baltimore and Ohio
Railroad Company; verdict for plaintiff for one
cent damages. Plaintiffs attorneys, Campbell Car
rngton Hayden johnson; DEFENDANTS attorney.
George 4. Hamilton.
Schneider IS. Walker. e1ecutTix Judgment on
verdict and reference 70 auditor. Plaintiffs at
torneys. Birney & WOodsrd defendants attorney.
]. b. Archer. u.
Puscy Va Wilson: continued for the term Plain
tits attorney. J. A. BurkArt; DEFENDANTS attorney.
n. + Davis.
snbbleaeld vs Giles: continued for the tenn.
Plaintiffs attorney, Howard Boyd defendants at
torne5s. Arthur Peter ?. B. Ray, and 7. L.
Jefords
Barsto~ vs. Capital Traction Company; certified
20 Circuit Court No. 2: plaintiffs attorneys lam
bert Mclean and Frank ]. Hogan; defendants
attorneys. r. R. Perry & Son and c. T. Dunlop
TyssoWsA Smith continued for the term
Plaintiffs attorneys Nathaniel Wilson and c. r.
Wilson defendants attorneys. Ralst0n & Sidd0ns
Waggaman Flanncry; suggestion Of hank
ruptc ot plaintiff aud order substituting Il. Rozez
Dulsny trustee. plaintiff
Assignment FOR to-day
No. 3. simmons " Kelly Attorneys. JOHN
Eid0ut-W. Z. Matthews
No. Il3 Kemp vs. Groce. Attorneys. MeNein *
Mcneil sud ". H. Fowle-E. Il. Thomas and F.
II. stephens.
No. u. Weston IS City and Suburban Railway.
Attorneys. " \. Riehardson-C. A. Douglas and q,
T. Hoover
No. 2s RoseufcId ". Home savings Bank Attor
nsys. J. Psysef-Hsmilt0n. Colbert. Yerkes d
Hamilton.
No. l1. Johnson rs. Washington RAILWAY and
Electric Company. Attorneys. Z. Forrest and C.
Bendhcin-C. a. Douglas and G. p. Hoover.
No l5l- smith vs.. Tribby, AttorneTs ". G,
Gardner and Z. y Hopevell-Hovasd BOYD and o.
T. N. Brown.
No. rs Madden " Fitzpatrick Attorneys. Gas
kins & Beckett-W. A Johnston.
Ne. Is Jolly IS Adams Attorneys. Lambert &
McLean-I. J. Darlington.
No. I57-Wgnderiy vs.. Meyers. Attorneys r. :
Hume and H. V. Tuiioch-T. L. Jeforis
No IN Jennings vs- Philadelphia, Baltimore and
Washington Rallwsy Company. Attorneys. E H
JacksOn-AfcKenney & F1annery.
Circuit Court No. 2.
JUSTICE ANDERSON.
Marsh rs. Washington Railway and Electric Com
pany; commission ordered 70 issue Plaintiffs attor-
ney. W. Z Lesser: defendants attorney, J. ]. Oar
lington.
Vaughan rs. Philadelphia. Baltimore ard Wash
ineton Railroad Company; on trial Plaintiffs at
torneys. Il H. Classic. c. F. Carusi. and c Il
syme: defendants attorneys. AIcKeuney 4 FIannery.
Reese Capital Traction Company: verdict for
plaintiff for Sz5: judgment forthwith without costs
Plaintiffs attorneys. J F. MeNaIy and Edwin For
rest; defendants attorneys. r. Ross Perry & Son
and G. 7. Dunlop.
Assignment fer to-day:
Ne q WESLEY Church vs. Chesapeake and Poto-
mac Telephone Company. Attorneys, Clinkscsles,
Scott & WSTthinst0n. Heald & Frailey
No 6. Owen Washington Railway and Elec-
tic Company. Attorneys, Mcneil & MCNeill-J. j.
Darlington
No l2. Moreland rs Brosnan. Attorneys, w, J.
Iambert-H Z. Davis
No Is GOldshy vs. Washington Railway and
Electric Company. Attorneys. J. Med. CarTington
and HARDEN Johnson-J. J. Darlington
~ re G~srFer
& McNeill-J. b. Archer r.
No q. Dale vs.. shsfer. Attorneys. E. S. Bailey
&C. J. F. Graf
No 81 Davis vs. Anacostia and Potomac Railroad
Conuany Attorneys W. G.. Gardner and E. n
Hopeweli--J. J. Darlington.
Nc 10. Dale vs. shafer. Attorneys. E. S. Bailey
C J. +. Graf.