The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-11-27
MANY EXPERTS
 ON THE STAND
CONTINUED FROM PAGE l.,

CONTINUED FROM PAGE I.l -~-~-~~----~-----~------ narrated by him in responding to ques tions. He said he had been for 9 years a specialist on nervous diseases and is now professor of nervous and mental diseases of the Baltdpore Medical col lege. The witness stated that he had heard the hypothetical question real yes terday an1 assuming that the statements made in | are correct he had come tc the conclusion that the person nanaeil in it was insane on the night of Deeem- Der S.
 T do not" he said, think that the party was capable of distinguishing be- tweea right and wrong at the time. dc not think she was capable of controlling herself 10 avoid the wrong"
 During the time Dr. Hill was on the stand Mrs. Bradley gave close attention to his testimony. She appeared to have much better control over her feelings than was the case yesterday.
 Asked by Attorney Baker, the hypotheti- cal question, if person of intelligence has a private grievance against another, travels to where that person Is, and be- fort starting would make the statement that she was going to kill that person, and after the killing would make a state ment that she had done what she intend
 
 insane?
 Dr. Hill said she would be perfectly sane, provided there was nothing unusual in the individual. He then described again Mrs. Bradleys state of mind for some time previous to and on the day of the shooting
 pr. Evans on Stand.
 pr. Britton D. Evans of New York. di- rector of the New Jersey hospital for the insane, was then placed on the stand by the defense. pr. Evans testified in the Thaw case to the effect that Thaw was insane when he shot Stanford White in New York. He gave the names of many medical institutions and societies with which he has been connected.
 When Judge Powers stated the hypo- thetical question to pr. Evans he re- piled, referring to the time Mrs. Bradley ion she was insane; she was not able to distinguish between right and wrong adn was not able to avoid the wrong and choose the right as sane person does"
 As the testimony was given Mrs. Brad ley moved her hands nervously and low cred her head. Her face took on a strange expression and she closed her eyes nervously and breathed heavily. As ldfHl OL luSttuty was COlil- mented on at length by the witness she was under percepitble mental strain.
 After Dr. Evans left the stand Judge Powers read the letters which Mrs. Brad ley tore up and which were pasted to- gether by the postoffice department. They were filled with protestations of love and devotion to Senator Brown and certain passages caused the defendant to weep. It was manifest that she was struggling with herself to keep from crying aloud Between tears and suppressed sobs she nervously clutched her hands, her whole frame shook and only the high arms oi the chair kept her from toppling oyer.
 As on former occasion, she gathered herself together but was the picture of abject despair.
 Recess at 12:3O was taken until 1.15 o'clock.
 Afternoon Session.
 Before court was opened this afternoon Mrs. Bradley had a widespread conver- sation with her counsel. She had re- turned from luncheon looking much re- freshed and seemed greatly interested in what her attorneys had to say. For the first time during the day her face lost it's dull, care-worn look.
 Dr. Evans was not cross-examined. Mrs. Bradley was recalled to the stand and questioned concerning her former testimony.
 She had ceased to live with her hus. band about December 1, 1900, when Brad ley left her Up to that time she had beer a dutiful wife and she gave him no cause for assertion.
 Max Brown Called. One of the most dramatic incidents of the last several days of the trial was the reappearance of Max Brown, son of the late Senator, who was called by the gov ernment in rebuttal. He was identified and his effort to keep his eyes from Mrs Bradley was apparent. Mrs Bradley looked at him intently from the time he went to the stand.
 Max Brown said he first saw Mrs Bradley in 1896 in St. Louis. He did not see her then very much, but saw more of her in 1897 and 1898 at their home ir Salt Lake City. In 1898 and 1899 he saw her frequently.
 Who did she appear to go to your house to see?" asked the district attor- ney.
 My mother"
 This intimacy, he said, ran in periods Sometimes she would come three or fouI days in succession and again she would not come in three or four weeks. After 1900 she frequently brought her child Az thur to the house.
 Judge Wenger Testifies. J. c. Wenger judge of the police court of Salt Lake City, testified to hay ing known Mrs. Bradley for ten years having met her in political meetings. Ir reply to questions by the district attor- ney, he said that in March. 1905, Mrs Bradley came to his office and said sht wanted him to do her a favor.
 'I said anything I can do, consistently I will do for you. She said, ' want you to see Mrs. Brown and have her get Q divorce, so I can marry the, senator said Mrs. Bradley, I am not in the home-breaking business, and l certainly will not!'
 Judge King Recalled. Judge William H. King was called to the stand. He is the attorney at Salt Lake City, who offered a money settle ment to Mrs. Bradley to induce her tc leave Br. Brown
 'I told her." he said, that l was au- thorzed by Mir. and Mrs. Brown to make a proposition to purchase her a home for not more than 5000 and to arrange to give her $100 a month until her youngest child should be 21 years old. I told hei mortgage would be given on everything MT. and Mrs. Brown owned to secure the payment of the $l00 per month. Sht said she would not accept the proposition that MT. Brown had to leave the old lady, or the madame. on the hill, ana marry her. I told her Mr. Brown could not marry her because he was a married man and therds was no ground on whicl to get divorce. She said she would moi accept the proposition and that MT Brown would have to leave Mrs. Browr