The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-10-10

Drug company vs. Seaboard Air Line Railway company. appeal by defendant; Joe Penn ys. A. F. Leatherwood, appeal by defendant
 In Judge Lanes division of the circuit court the case of the Suburban Realty and Investment company vs. Sloss-Shef- field Steel and Iron company was on trial all day and will be resumed this morning. This Is a suit for damages caused by overflow.
 The following docket is set in Judge Lanes division today:
 Sarah E. Nance vs. Western Union Tel egraph company; G. W. Ranson vs. Southern Railway company, damages; Lottie Sheats, pro ami, vs. Birmingham Railway Light and Power company, dam ager; Mike zeock vs. Tutwiler Coal. Coke and Iron company, damages; Henry Link vs. Southern Bell Telephone and Tee- graph company. damages.
 City Court.
 In the first division of the city court yesterday Judge Ferguson cleared his docket early in the day.
 A judgment for 1 cent damages was rendered in the case of Jennie Me- Ewell vs. Mims B. Stone. and a similar judgment In the case of Tiny Hatch against the same defendant. The plaintiffs are both young girls who allege they went to Stones soda water parlor and were refused refreshments. The complainants charged defamation of character and claimed $10,000 each
 The following docket Is set in the first division today:
 c. F. Mcdonald vs. C. B. Jennings. appeal by defendant; Craddock Terry company vs. Rex Shoe company, as- sNfnpsit; Lichtman Goodman & Co. ct al. vs. B. Zavelo, damages; Jefferson Brick company vs. Mrs. Mary Didake. appeal; Margret N. Tuner pro ami vs. l. H. Lee Merrill, ejectment; K. w. Gayle vs. P. c. Bowman ct al. as- sumpts; lG w. Young vs. Charles A. Hassler. appeal by defendant; J. T. Hilton vs. Clark & Sons ct al, certio- rari by defendant
 In the second division of the city court yesterday the jury in the case of Mrs. l.. J. Alexander vs. Southern Railway company returned verdict for the plaintiff for s66.
 The case of Robert Franks vs. Bir- mtngham Railway, Light and Power company was on trial all day and re- suited in a verdict for the defendant
 The following docket is set in the second division today
 Bertie Taylor pro ami Vs. Jefferson county damages J. L. Busenlehner vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company damages: Benjamin F Chas- tan vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company. damages; George Freeman vs. Birmin gham Railway Light and Power company, dana ges
 In the third division of the city court yesterday the case of s. ]. Hart vs. Tennessee Coal. Iron and Railroad company was concluded at o'clock and resulted in verdict for the plain tiff for S1sO
 Both sides announced ready in the case of Louis Whaley vs. -Shef- field Steel and Iron company.
 The following docket is set in the third division today
 Addie Nelson vs. Birmingham Rail- Ways~Light and Power company dam ages: William $. Mckenzie Vs Bir- mingham Railway Light and Power company, damages; James R. Aycock. administrator vs. Birmingham Boiler Works ct al. damages; John Luclxie vs. Decatur Car Wheel and Manufac- turing company. damages.
 In the equity division Of the city court yesterday the following cases were dismissed:
 od-Dickerson Supply company vs. l.. Cocciola. George Nj. Ryall vs Paul Gilardoni, Sellers Buchanan vs. Hugh Buchanan.
 The following docket is set in the equity division today
 America O. Burnside vs. John c. Wright. Edward E. Dean vs A. c. Roberts ct all, E. L. Adler xs. w. T. Sexton ct al., First National Bank vs Railway Compress company ct al, W. NJ. Little vs k. D. Johnston ct al w. C. Agee & Co vs Louisville and Nash vile Railroad company ct all, Avondale Mills vs. Ala bama Great Southern Rail- road company, W. H. HIassenger ct al. vs. Mayor and Aldermen of Birming- ham.
 Chancery Court.
 The fall term of the chancery court opens today with regular daily docket extending to December F. The follow ing cases are set for today:
 F. w. Frances ct al. vs Jefferson County Savings bank Sam Will John, administrator do bonis noa. vs William J. I.unsford ct all.; Fannie W. Smith vs. Mayor and Aldermen of Birmingha.n; Alabama National bank vs Coal City Coal and Coke company ct al: D. F. AL len vs. Della w. Enslen ct al II. c. Davidson vs. Daniel Collier ct al; S. Spiro vs. Louis Cocciola; Wilson L. lief len vs. H. P Hef1en. administrator. ct al; Walter Hoffman .vs. L. W Johns
 Criminal Court.
 There was very little business in the first division of the criminal court yes terday. Most of the cases set for trial were passed. The trial of Harry @ \