The Montgomery advertiser., 1907-11-27


 spo,e her. face iiehssd up syghtiy snd about her lips played . smile that seemed strangely out O. place on so ghastly face. 4 prsnat3c Incident. One of the most dramaeic incidents during the last several days of the trial was the reappearance of Max Brown. . son of the iate Senator. who was called by the Government in re- buttal. He was quiet and dignifed, and his efforts to keep his eyes from Mrs. Bradley was apparent. Mrs. Bradley looked at him intently from the time he went to the stand.
 Max Brown said he first saw Mrs. Bradley in 1886 in St. Louis. He did not see her then very much. but saw more of her in 1897 and 1898 at their honae in Salt Lake City. Tn 1898 and 1899 he saw her frequently. "who did she appear to go to your house to seer asked the District At torney. HI My mother. This intimacy" he | said. iran in periods. Sometimes she would be there tbree or four days in succession, and again she would not come in three or four weeks. After 1900 she frequently brought her child. Arthur, to the house. 'sShe continued to come to the Brown uOfIkC lSVAsA .LHG WitHSSS Salu. How would your father act with your mother in the presence of Mrs. Bradley?"
 Very afrectionate.
 The disclosure of his fathers reia- tons with Mrs. Bradley came in 1901 and after that she came to the house three or four times. She todk dinner fall, of 1901 his mother left the city to attend the bedside of dying sister and during her absence Mrs. Bradley was at their home.
 When he was returning home one night Brown said he saw a light in the kitchen and in the cellar and when he wont to investigate who was there In the kitchen. They had several fruit jars which they were bringing from the cellar.
 Mrs. Bradley. who had her eyes fixed on the young man, laughed heartily when reference was made to bringing the fruit jars from the cellar to the kitchen
 father and Mrs. Bradley at the ranch. They were sitting on a bed together when he saw them.
 David H. Wenger. Judge of the Po- lice Court of Salt Lake City, testified to having known Mrs Bradley for ten years. having met her in political cam pafgns In reply to questions by the District Attorney, Judge wenger said that in March 1905. Mrs. Bradley came to his office and said she wanted him to do her a favor.
 Wanted Mrs. Brown Divorced.
 T said anything can do. consist ently. I will do for you She said I want you to see Mrs. Brown and have her get a divorce so I can mar LA c~- NF~~ Dx~1 1yAx. am not in the business of breaking up families and I certainly will not !"
 From all the various interviews you have had with her. did you at the time form any opinion as to her sanity ar insanityT
 T did not"
 Looking back now. have you any opinion7"
 Counsel for the defendant objected to this question and the court remarked that if the jury should fail to draw a conclusion as to her sanity from the testimony already given they had very different minds from. his own.
 .'If man gays he never considered the sanity of person. if was on remark l the court.
 The witness, in reply to question, siad Mrs. Bradley acted rationally.
 Judge William ii. King was recalled to the stand. He Is the attorney at Salt Lake City who offered money settlement to Mrs Bradley to induce her to leave Mir. Brown
 q told her." said the witness. that was authorized by Mir. and Mrs. Brown to makesa proposition to pur- chase for her a home for not more than $5, 900 and to arrange to give her Sl00 a month until her youngest child should be 21 years of age. told her
 IA Atx thing MT. and Mrs. Brown owned to secure the payment of, the $l0o per month. She said she would not accept the proposition; that Mir. Brown had to leave the old lady. or the madam on the hill,' and marry her. l told her Mir. Brown could not marry her because he was a married man and A divorce. She said she would not accept the proposition and that MT. Brown would have to leave Mrs. Brown and come to live with her. 1. The witness said the defendant talk ed rationally on that occasion and was coherent.
 Cross-examination developed the fact fer of a home and money for Mrs. Bradley, Mrs. Bradley declared that she did not want money for herself, but only wanted Brown to marry her and give the children name.
 James Bowen. who previously tes- ttfled in the case. said that In 1906 he talked with Mrs. Bradley and she was perfectly rational. Bowen at that time was an attendant at the state insane asylum, but he was not called as an expert.
 Stoned Br0wass House.
 He related the story of Mrs. Brad ley's alleged throwing of stones at the windows of Senator Browns house, and that when he tried to stop her she said that she would let him get one"
 Mrs. Bradley in her testimony denied throwing the stones.
 The witness cn cross-examination said that when Mrs. Bradley spoke of hitting him with a stone, she laugh ed. She also lsughed when she told him that she had a pistol with which to shoot Senator Brown.
 R. c. Livingston, stenographer of the late Senator Brown at Salt Lake for several years. testified to having seen Mrs. Bradley in Mir. Browns law office on many occasions. In the fall of 1906 he said she wanted him to. get her satchel from Senator Browns house. and cautioned him not to open 1t, He became suspicious of the contents of the satchel. and finally Mrs. Bradley admitted that she had a gun" in it. He went to the house to get it. say ing he would turn the gun over to Mir. Brown. but when he got there he