The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-12-02
RECORD OF THE COURTS


 Business will be resumed this morn- ing in all the courts. Jury trials will be held in both divisions of the circuit court, three divisions of the city court and the first division of the criminal court.
 Juries will be organized at 10 o'clock this morning and jurors are requested to be present in court at that hour.
 Circuit Court Dockets.
 The following docket is set in Judge j lne's division of the circuit court to- day:
 Charlie Gibson vs. Wallace Investment company, damages; Bert Bynum vs. B. F. Leo, damages; Daisy Smith vs. Br- mingham Railway, Light and Power company. damages; Lena Snider vs. J.. T. Burton ct al, damages; Will Cook vs. Southern Bithulithic company damages; William Hall vs. Roegner Bros, appeal by plaintiff; c. M. Vaughan vs. c. H. Greenly, damages; c. M. Vaughan vs. c. T. Cooke, damages; Nora D. Mills vs. Birmingham Railway Light and Power company, damages; Mrs. M. K. Irwin vs. Birmingham Railway Light and Power company, damages.
 In the absence of Judge Coleman the following docket is set for trial before Judge Miller in the circuit court
 M w Phillips vs. w. II. Bachelder ct al, assumpsit; J. c. Morris vs Ala bama Casket and Coffin company, dam ages; Weller & Co. vs. Alabama and Birmingham Air Line Railway company q ali 3y and Nashville Railroad company, dam ages; b. o. Howle vs. l.. H. Goldstein, trustee, ct al. damages; Clauss Shear company vs. Barber Supply company, assumpsit; Agrmi Fruit and Produce company vs. Martin Cracker company, damages; J. l. Odom vs. Little Warrior Coal and Coke company. assumpsit; the Enos company vs. Alabama Supply com pany, assumpsit.
 City Court Dockets.
 The following docket is set in the first division of the city court to- day:
 c. A. Wickersham vs. Alabama Steel and Wire company, damages; J. M Meeks vs. Wilbur E. Hansburger ct al, damages R. Knauff & Co. vs. Jennie D. Torrey. assumpslt; Mildred Rauv vs Birmingham Bottle Supply company, apepal by defendant Mary Sadler vs H. Lowenthal ejectment; B. T. Green vs. w. H. Griffin ct all, damages; J. P. Miller vs. B. Zavelo ct al., assump- 2 sit: Vaughan & Sons ct als. vs. Evans Brothers Construction company, trover c. l.. Guice vs. Birmingham Boiler Works ct als, assumpsit; the Philip Carey Manufacturing company vs. Joseph Bryon ct als., assumpsit; Mrs. Hattie Hannon vs Mrs. P. M. Vade- boncener, ejectment
 The following docket is set in the second division of the city court to- day:
 Willie Eastis vs. Birmingham Ral'- way. Light and Power company, dam ages: w. c. Agee & Co. vs. Louisville and Nashville Railraod company, dam ages; Arthnr Morgan vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company damages: Robert F. Lacky vs. Birming- ham Railway, Light and Power com many damages Jack Lambie vs. Bir- mingham Trading company. damages; S. WigginS Ne. birlilhSh ha"i Works company, damages; w. R. car michael. administrator vs. tennessee Coal Iron and Railroad company, dam ares: Sarah Noojin vs. Birmingham Railway. Light and Power company damages; George w. Warnick, admin istrator. vs Alabama Steel and Wire comnanv. damages; Alice Wyatt as ad-
 Ia Steel Wire company, damages.
 The following docket is set in the third division of the city court today
 A q. Wilson vs. Alabama Great South ern Railroad company. damages; George Moore vs Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; Murphy Eadv vs. Western Union Telegraph com- many. damages; Nose Clay vs tennessee Coal Iron and Railroad company, dani- ages. F. A. Stein vs Andrew W. Burgin' damages; John G. Jost vs Birmingham Railway Light and Power company, dam- ages. Jeff Sims vs. Birmingham Raii- way Light and Power company, dam ages. c. M Vaughan vs. Birmingham Railway. Light and Power company, damages: Perry F. Stone. pro ami, vs. soutb and North Alabama Railroad com many damages Charles s. -1oseley, ad- n,nistrator, vs. Birmingham Railway, 1jeht and Power company, damages; G. Moria administrator, vs. Alabama Steel and Wire company, damages.
 The following docket is set in the equity division of the city court today:
 I.eo Collins ct al vs. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company, ct al; R. E Collins ct al vs. Alabama and Birming- ham Air Line; Nathan Johnson vs. Ellen Johnson: Elvina Ruth vs. C. B. Ruth; Toe Hechinger vs. Dora Hechinger; John [, Turner vs Tennessee Coal, Iron and RailroaZ company.
 chancery Court Dockets.
 The following docket is set in the chan cery court today
 Hannah King ct al. vs. Charles King; George Lewis vs Rosy Lewis; Daisy Cli5- by vs. A. A. Clisby: E. w. Fucker vs Tennessee Coal. Iron and Railroad com pany; Joe Avery vs. Martha Avery; Ala bama National bank vs. Victor Gage; Alabama National bank vs. w. C. Abbott; William Baker, ,vs NJ. c. Jackson ct all ". A. Lovett vs. James B. Bibby.