Arizona republican., 1907-01-16
THE SUPREME COURT
 LAYS OUT ITS WORK
Two cs Inc Most Important Cases Will
 Probably TO Over For the Tern. Dates of Hearing in Other Actions.

| The supreme court yesterday calle; ! the calendar and set cases for the mex | ten days. There were admitted to tis ! bar. W. K Dial. A. g. Lynch. l.. I. 1 Henry and Lee N. Stratton who ha, been favorably reported by the exam. 1 ming committed The bond of r. A | Tritle Jr. as clerk of the court was ap- 1 proved.
 When the case of F. F.. Daggs ap- | pellant against the Territory. respond | ent from this county. was reached, a motion was made on behalf of the at 1 torney general to be allowed sixty days : in which to examine the brief of the appellant and file one. The motion was allowed and the appellant was given thirty days in which to file re- ply brief. The court accordingly or dered the case continued for term. The important case Of A. Steinfeld and others appellants against Louis Zeckendorf. appellee from Pima coun- ty. will probably not be tried this term. When it was reached it was made known to the court that E. A Meserve of Los Angeles. who is asso ciatcd with Frank T. Hereford for the appellee. could not be present. lie is now in Washington a member of q California commission sent to congress to sec what could be done in securing national assistance in restoring th Colorado river Co it's former channel. Frank Heney. one of the attorneys of the appellants. it was stated. was in Tucson ready to take up the case.
 The court made no order regarding this case but let it go over for the time.
 The following cases were set for to day: Liberty Mining and Smelting company appellant against Robert W. Gcddes appellee from Pima county.
 Coconino county appellant against the board of supervisors of that county to recover an attorneys fee allowed by the board against the advice of the district attorney of the county
 Martin Buggeln. appellant. against Mics J. Cameron appellee. This is one of the actions in the controversy over the Bright Angel trail which has been before the court for several years.
 Other cases were set as follows. January r. Territory Of Arizona ap pellant against James Logan Alexan der respondent. Graham county; Mon tezuma Canal company appellant against Smithville Canal company. ap- Tellee. Graham county.
 January IS. Alien R. English aEi wife appellees against Territory, e& rel J. W. Began. tax collector of Pima county; Jol:n McGowan. appellant against J. \. Gaines. tax collector or Cochise county.
 January 70, William Thomas appel ant against Territory. respondent. Mo have county Equitable Life Assurance society appellant against David Bab bitt. appellee. CoconinO county.
 January 22. American Copper com uany. bankrupt: appellant agains- Benjamin Blanchard and the Howell Mining Company, appellees. Yavapdi county.
 January 9. Prescott National Bank appellant. against \. J. Head. appellee. Tavapai county; Nellie Buffeher ap- peliant. against Territory respondent GiIa county; old Dominion Copper company appellant against Nellie Hay- erly. Harry Jones. James Wall anL J. F. Wall, Gila county.
 January q. l. II. Daniel and others appellants against James Gallagher and others. appellees. Gila county.
 anuary 25. J. N. Porter appellant. against J. W. Brown, appellee. Gila county.
 January 2G. National Metal company appellant against Greene Consolidated Mining company appellee santa Cruz county; Boquilias Land and Cattle company appellant against St. David Cooperative and Development Asso ciation. appellee. Cochise county.
 Tn the matter of the estate of Fran cisco Morales. NJ. Pima del Pino aP- pellant against Librado de Romero, appellee. motion to dismiss appeal was denied. A similar order was made in the case of the Union Iron Works gainst the Vekol Mining company. In the case Of Margaret Ellen Jones ap- pellant against Charles W. Morris. ap- police a motion to affirm on the short uanscrips was granted.
 Henry MaillaTd's famous New Jrk