The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-02-05
RECORD OF THE COURTS


 The forenoon was lost in the courts late in attendance In the afternoon juries were organized in the circuit and first division of the city court. The jury in the criminal court was not completed.
 Circuit Court.
 In the circuit court yesterday the case of W. R. Anderson vs. Zack HolluIns is on trial. The plaintiff is seeking dam ages for the foreclosure of a mortgage.
 Circuit Court Docket.
 The following docket is set for trial in the circuit court today. c. G. Warren Ys. Western Union Telegraph company, dam ages; Oliver F. Swartz vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages: J. C. Adams vs. Southern Rail way company, dameges; E. O. Carroll ct al vs Tennessee Coal. Iron and Rail- road company. damages; Cora Leyert vs Postal Telegraph Cable company, dam ages.
 City Court.
 In the first division of the city court yesterday the juries were organized In the afternoon. While waiting for the jurors to arrive Judge Nesmith went through the docket.
 The Alabama State Land company vs. Dave Stagg ct al, judgment nil dicit
 T. A. Cohen vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, settled and dismissed.
 The case of Will Horan vs. Gray x Dudley was on trial when court ad- journed.
 First Division Docket. The following docket Is set for trisl in the first division of the city court to- day:
 A J. Brasield vs. Sloss-Sheffield Steel and Iron company, damages; Lyon Bros vs. Harris Goldstein, assumpsit John Williams, administrator vs Louisville and Nashville Railroad company, dam ages; w. E. Christopher vs. Seaboard Air Line Railway company, damages; Mrs. J. H. Williams vs Western Union Tele- graph company, damages; Mary l.. Ware vs. the Order of United Commercial Tray elers, assumpsit; H. A. Elkourie vs. Bir- mingham Railway, Light and Power com 1 papy, damages; N. H. Sledge vs. Age | Hehald Publishing company, damages. In the second division of the city court yesterday a judgment for $1126 was en- tered for the plaintiff in the case of the National Machine and Nreclxing company vs. H. l. Goldstein.
 l Cornish x Co., vs. John J. Moore, dis missed for want of prosecution. Carolina Portland Cement company vs Southern Construction company; dis missed for want of prosecution. Richard Blackburn vs. Mrs. Luke How ard was on trial when court adjourned. Plaintiff claims balance due on contract for building house which the defen- dant refuses, alleging the plastering has not been properly done.
 Second Division Docket.
 The following docket is set for trial in the second division of the city court to day:
 Mayer Brothers vs. S. J. Phillipson, as- sumpsit; J. w. Ferguson vs. Fannie Tow ser, certiorari; Frank Townsley vs J. T. | Burton, ct al, damages; Fannie Towns ley vs. J. T. Burton, ct als. damages; state of Alabama, eX rel, W. M. Willard vs. John House mandamus F. NJ Boy XIII NS D. d. d lOI, tl dlS., dllsbcnIfleHl, Joe Thomas vs. Lige Harris, garnish- ment: w. D. Paris, coroner, vs. Jefferson county, appeal Max J. WinlSler Broker age company vs St. Louis and San Fran cisco Railroad company, appeal; Bunley V. Brock Vs Bell Brothers. attachments Sidney Hart vs. Walter House. ct al., ejectment; Andrew Stewart vs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad company, dam ages.
 Chancery Court. In the chancery court the register held a reference yesterday in the matter of the Birmingham Trust and Savings com pany, as trustee, vs. F. l.. Clark ct al. to ascertain the proper division of funds in the hands of the trustee. The case of the Central Trust company ys. S. H. Hill was submitted for final decree.
 n the case of Jennie Frederick vs. John