The Washington herald., 1907-04-09

mi.ted by Dir. @. " CottTen in behalf Of Mr.sW.
P. Belden for the petitioner. and Mr. j. L.
Washburn for the respondent
Ne Gal. Trey Wagon Works Company, petitioner.
vs. Howard L. Hancock trustee. petition for WHIT
OF certiorari 10 the United States Circuit Court OF
Appeals for the Seventh circuit submitted by Mr..
Duane z, Fox in behalf Of Dir. Charles MaTtindaie,
and Mr. A. ". Buckley for the petitioner and by
Mfr. James ~. Noel for the respondent.
No. 483 Frederick Seymour Harrington. plaintiff IN
error vs. The State OF Missouri; motions 20 dis
miss or sairm submitted by Mr.. John L. Lott in
behalf Of Mr. H. S. Hadley in support Of motions.
and by Alr. William G. Johnson in opposition
thereto
No SOL Demar Jockey Club, plaintiff IN error.
State q Missouri in the relation Of the attor
hey general: motions % dismiss or affirm submitted
hy Mr.. John l. Lott il behalf Of M. II. s. Had
ley in support of motions and By Mr.. Henry W.
Ba4d IN opposition thereto
No. ST. Damscle Howard administrators. &C.
plaintiff in eTrcr vs.. The IlIirois Central Railroad
no, 5sl \. C. Brooks. administrators. &c, plain-
tif ia error. vs. Southern Pacific Company; ordered
% be heard as one CAST and Qae-hah hour addi-
tional time allowed each side on motion q Mr.
Alexander r. Humphrey for the defendant in error
in W 59l.
No. Original TX rarte. In the matter Of
Fernando Vazquez MoEles ct al. petitioners motion
for leave TO file petition for an appeal submitted
By Mr.. II. E Smith for petitioners.
No. 65i. County Of Preside. Tex, petitioner rs
The NoelYoyng Bond and Stock Company; pc
tition tor writ - certi0far 10 the United States
Ci1cuit Court Of Appeals Tor the Fith circuit sub
niitted By Afr George A. King ia behalf Of Mr.. T.
J. Bean FOX the petitioner and hy Alr slillard Pat
terson for the respondent
Ne, lS5 City Il Chicago. appellant "a Chicago
City HaliWaF Company appeal from the Gircuit
Court Of the United States for the Northern dis
tFict If Illinois: decree reversed with costs Oh
confession II error and consent # counsel and
cause Temanded for further proceedings according TO
law. on motion Of Nh. John Z. Wilson for the ap-
pellee.
No. 82l Luis Bravo ct al. &C. appellants. rs.
EEniis Gomez e. al appeal from the District Court
q the United States for the district Of Porto Rico
dismissed Per stipulation motion Of Mr. Frederic
d. Mckinney for the apfellees
No. 65s School District No. H. Dakota County
NebE.. petitioner. Edward H. Chapman Il al
administrator sc. petition for writ Il eertiorari
20 the United States Circuit Court Of Appeals Tor
the Eighth circuit submitted by Mr. Frederick ID.
McKenney in behalf Of Mr. Ebert H. Hubbard for
the petitioner.
No 63 The Deutsche Levante Line. claimant.
&c. petitioner ys. J. Samuel Stephenson, et al;
No 6ll The Dutsche Leyante Line, claimant,
&c., petitioner. Constantine S. Galanopuo
No SIS The Dcutsche Leysute Line. claimant
&c. petitioner. vs. The HILLS Bros. Co.:
No SIS The DeBtsche Lefante Line claimant
&c, petitioner vs.. The National Board Of Marine
Underwriters: aud
No CO The Deutsche Leraute Line. claimant
&c, petitioner. vs. William r. Harris; petition for
Of Appeals for the Second circuit submitted by Mr.
Frederic ID, NcKenney in behalf Of AlF. Harrington
Putnam FOR the petitioner and by Mr. Lawrence
kueoiand for the respondents
No. 81. Hammond Packing Company, plaintiff in
erFor The State Of Arkansas; motion 20 advance
submitted by Air. Robert A. Howard ia behalf u
counsel tor defendant IN error.
No. g. William s. Dexter Fl al, trustees. &C
plaintiff in cu0r. IS. Salem b. Charles Ct al as
Board * Street Commissioner &c. IN error 10 the
A1fFHeTuu furifnaf ff rF ohm
sets; continuance st aside and writ Of error dis
missed. with costs, peT stipulation.
No. 81. BainhTidse vs.. Bmdick appellant vs.
William Dillon et a. sipoal from the United States
Circuit Court 4 Appeals fer the First circuit dis
missed ler stipulation
No. 6s The Texas and Pacific Railway Company
Plaintiff in cuur, vs.. Ben Small; IN crror % the
United States Circuit Court Of Appeals for the Fifth
circuit. dismissed. With oosts. on motion of counsel
Tor the plaintiff in cuoL
No. Is, original Tx parte: In the matter of James
Polh1. petitioner. Argued by afr Roger Foster
Ter the petitioner and by Mr. Rush Taggsrt for
the respondent
No s35. Robert NJ Green plaintiff in error. -
Chicago burlington and Quincy Ralway Company
Submitted by Mr. John q. johnson and Mr.. Frank
r Pritchard for the plaintiff IN error and by SIR
Francis Rawle for the defendant ia cTog
No. 81 Samuel 3. Raymond. County Treasurer
&c, ~ al, appellants, Chicago Union Traction
COMPANY:
No IS Samuel B. Raymond. County Treasurer
&e., et al. appellants. Chicago Edison Company.
No. 826. Samuel B. RAYMOND County Treasurer
&c. e a.. appellants. Chicago City Railway
Company.
No AZ samuel r. Raymond County Treasurer
&c. e. al, appellants Va. TIE South Chicago City
Railway Cempany;
No. as samuel b. Rayu oud County Treasurer,
&c. 70 a.. appellants 9he Peoples Gas Light
and Coke Company;
Ne 40 Samuel ,. Raymond. County Treasurer.
&c. "a al. appellants. Chicago Telephone CoJa-
paHyi and
Ne. $50 Samuel B Raymond County Treasurer.
&c. Ct al appellants. vs. Chicago Consolidated
Traction Company Argument commenced BY Mr.
Davis IS. Tone for the appellants
Adjourned until to-day az = O'Clock
The day call fer Tuesday April g. will BE- as
follows. Nos 81 20 sc inclusive. $50 5s7 and 59D
Sc 81. IS 25i. 3D. 263 land 3sH, 90