The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-05-21
RECORD OF THE COURTS.

Juries were quickly organized tin the cir cult and city courts yesterday morning. Owing to the illness of Judge Ferguson the docket in the first division of the city court was taken up by Judge Sharp. No cases were tried in the first division of the criminal court yesterday. The juries were not completed.
 Circuit Court.
 In Judge Coleman's division of the cir cult court yesterday the case of Collins X Go. vs. Corn Exchange bank was on trial and has not concluded.
 John A. Wright vs. D. w. Houghton, dismissed.
 James Allen, pro ami vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, con- sent judgment for $100.
 The following docket is set in Judge Colemans division of the circuit court today:
 Robert Jones vs. Western Union Tele- graph company, damages; Henrietta Will Hams pro ami vs. Birmingham Railway. Light and Power company, damages; A. G. Schaeffer vs Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; Tanner Bros. vs. Mrs. NJ. T. Royster, as- sumpsit; Moore X Handley Hardware company vs E. M. Wheeler, garnish- ment.
 In Judge Lane's division of the city court the case of Messer-Moor Real Iis- tate and Insurance company vs. w. C. Agee resulted in verdict for $25.
 In the case of Texie Jones, pro ami vs. Pioneer Mining and Manufacturing company a consent judgment for s1250 was rendered for the plaintiff.
 The following docket is set in Judge Lanes division of the circuit court to- day:
 l.. E. Mckinney vs. Western Union Tel egraph company, damages; James AL len pro ami vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages Charles M. Pfiefer x Co vs. O. w. Froc- man x Co, assumpst; S. Godstein X Co., vs. Southern Railway company, dam ages.
 City Court.
 Judge Ferguson was absent from the first division of the city court yesterday owing to illness. Judge Sharpe presided In his stead,
 The case of Ed I<endriclx pro ami VIZ. Birmingham Southern Railroad company was tried and went to the jury late in the afternoon.
 First Division Docket.
 The following docket is set in the first 5ivsion of the city court today:
 Frank D. Pruitt vs. Crockett Paving company, damages: Paul Giacopazz ad- ministrator, vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company. damages; A. w. McCurry vs. l.. L. Stevenson, as- sumpsit; Birmingham Dry Goods com-
 .i4. Emma McNeal vs Birmingham Railway. Light and Power company, damages; Julius Craig vs. Decatur Car Wheel Man ufacturng company. damages; John Crowley vs Birmingham. Railway, Light and Power company, damages; Mrs. Anna D. Church vs. Pullman company, dam ages.
 In the second division of the city court yesterday the docket was passed. Second Division Docket-Non Jury. The following docket is set in the second division of the city court today:
 Andrew Stewart vs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad company, damages; Birmingham Sand and Brick company vs. s. w. John, administrator, assumpslt; Propst Bromler compeny vs Ensley Southern Railroad company ct al. as- sumpsit; Albert Fuller vs Jchn P. Alb bott, damages; M. Catz vs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad company dam ages; J. w. Farrior & Co. vs. c. w. Phalin ct al., assumpsit; w. F.. Ferry vs. J. T. Burton, appeal R. II. Agee ct al. vs B. Q. Watkins; Elizabeth Hopper vs. F. B. Clark. assumpsit; c. F. Moritz & Go. vs. J. Leader Ss Son, garnishment: Jefferson County Savings bank vs. msur- ance Company of North America. assump- sit; Jefferson County Savings bank vs. Connecticut Fire Insurance company, as- sumpsit; Emma J. 1<ates vs. A. Seaman, attachment; Postum Cerial company vs. Consolidated Grocery company, garnish- ment; Southern States Portland Cement company vs. Birmingham Sand and Brick company, assumpsit.
 In the third divisicn of the city court yesterday the case of J. w. Isreal vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company was on trial and has not con cluded.
 Third Division Docket-Jury.
 The following docket is set in the third division of the city court today:
 Brown-Tucker vs. Birmingham Railway,