The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-12-16
RECORD OF THE COURTS


 Jury cases will be on trial this week in the circuit court, the second and third divisions of the city court and the ii, st division of the criminal court. Non-jury cases will be tried in the first division of the city court and second dvsion of the criminal court. The equity docket will be taken up in the fourth division of the city court
 Juries will be organized at 10 o'clock this morning at which hour all jurors are requested to be present in their re- spective courts.
 The case of E. F. Pool Investment com-
 pany vs. Sloss-Sheffeld Steel and Iron company will be resumed in the second division of the city court.
 Circuit Court Dockets
 The following docket is set for trial
 today in Judge Colemans division of the circuit court:
 Allen Chipley Williams vs. Southern l Steel company, damages; Mary Hicks, ad- mlnistratrix, vs. Palos Coal and Coke | company, damages; Thomas K. Knight vs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad | company, damages; The Cable company vs Rosa Moor ct al, assumpsit: Will Thomas vs Birmingham Ore and Mining company, damages; M. l.. Easter vs. E. l.. Simon & Bro., damages; Mary E. White vs. Jack Clay, damages; Mary E. White vs. J. l.. Mattingly, damages; Johnson County Savings Bank vs Consolidated Mercantile company, assumpsit; H. l.. Badham vs. N. L. S. Lunsford, assump- sit.
 The following docket is set for trial in Judge Lanes division of the circuit court | today:
 Julia Dowdell vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; James Glass vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; George Ausbrook vs. Sloss-Sheffield Steel and Iron company, damages; Mrs. Annie T. Marks, administrative, vs. Birming-
 ham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; Mrs. Minnie Lee vs. Birming- ham Railway Light and Power company, 1 damages; The w. F. Robertson Steel and ! Iron company vs. the Birmingham Coop craze company, assumpsit; LaCross Coal company vs. Central of Georgia Railway company, damages; Henry J. Smith vs. Southern Railway company, damages; William Powers vs. Republic Iron and Steel company, damages; Bruce Smith pro
 ami vs Southern Railway company, dam ages.
 City Court Docket. The following docket of non-jury cases
 is set for trial in the first division of the
 city court today:
 Mary Hartigan vs. Hewes & Booth ct as., assumpsit: Watson M Connor vs.
 Benjamin L. Atkins, damages; W. R. All exander vs St. Louis and San Francisco
 Railroad company, appeal by defendant; Charley McClendon vs. St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad company, appeal by defendant; John Kelley vs. Silva Kel- ley, appeal by plaintiff; Gordon M. Sim ,monds vs Grand Union Tea company, damages; Ernest Fi Myers vs. William R. McVay, Jr., damages; Geogge Full ghum vs. Peter Perolio, damages Char
 ley Love vs. St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad company, appeal by defendant; Jonce L. Gardner vs. Equitable Loan and Trust company, assumpsit; Will Peel vs.
 Eader Howard, appeal by plaintiff; Will
 liam Hunt vs. T. P. West ct als., cer-
 tiorari by defendant; William c. Davis
 vs Birmingham Terminal company. dam
 ages; Samuel Sapp vs. John Higgins.
 ejectment; Max J. Winkler Brokerage
 company vs. J. W. Sapp appeal by gar
 nishee; M. James vs. J. w. Shoot appeal
 by plaintiff; Bonnie & Co. vs. c. o. An
 derson, assumpsit.
 The following docket is set for trial in
 the second division of the city court to-
 day;
 Bessie Mitchell. pro ami. vs. Louisville
 and Nashville Railroad company. dam ages; Frying Fries vs M. Robertson,
 damages; Mrs. s. E. Shugart vs Pullman . company. damages; Mary Williams. pro ami, vs. Birmingham Railway. Light and
 Power company, damages; Hannah Tal- ford vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and
 Power company, damages; James A. damages; Walter J. Powell vs. Birning- ham Railway, Light and Power com pany, damages; M. K Collins vs. Louis- vile and Nashville Railroad company, damages: Fred G. sheppart vs. c. w. Austin, damages; Ernest Earle, pro ami. vs Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad company, damages: w. M Nelson. ad-
 ministrator efc., vs. Alabama Steel and
 Wire company. damages. {.
 The following docket Is set in the third