The Birmingham age-herald., 1907-11-15
RECORD OF THE COURTS

H
 Business in the courts yesterday was mainly devoted to the trial of cases car- ried over from the day before.
 The case of Mrs. s. ID. Cox, administra- trix, vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for s15,OOO This is the case which was on trial in the circuit court last night until after Il o'clock.
 The case of Morgan l.. Brown vs. Bir- mingham Railway, Light and Power com pany is on trial in the circuit court be- fore Judge Miller, and will be resumed this morning at 8 o'clock sharp In the circuit court before Judge Ray the case of Antonio Ardugno vs. T. c. Thompson was on trial all day yester- day and will be resumed this morning. Progress with this case Is very slow on account of the plaintiffs witnesses being Italians, all of whom require the services of an anterpreter. The suit is for dam ages for the loss of services of a boy aged about years, who. 1t is alleged, was knocked down by an automobile and per- sonally injured.
 The following docket is set in the cir cult court before Judge Miller today: Will McNen vs. Birmingham Railway Light and Power company, damages; An- nie Clark vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; s. C. Douglass vs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad company damages; The War rant Warehouse company vs. H. I. Gold stein, assumpslt.
 f,I before Judge Ray in the circuit court to- day:
 J. W. Ferguson vs. Birmingham Water Works company, damages; Brewer S Jones vs. Mountain Terrace Land com- pany, assumpsit; Holly Mullen vs South ern Steel company, damages; Albert Bailey Vs Louisville and Nashville Rail- road company, damages; M. M. Gilbert ct al. vs Louisville and Nashville Rail- road company, damages
 City Court.
 Tn the first division of the city court yesterday the cases of Laura Martin vs. Charles A. Brown. appeal by the plaintiff; and Polly striping vs. Peoples Mutual Aid association, appeal by defendant, were dismissed
 In the case of E. D. Schran vs. W. T. Terry ct al. suit on note verdict for the defendant.
 A judgment for s62.5 was rendered in the case of Ida Dubose vs c. II. Thomp- son.
 The case of Chamberlin, Johnson & Du- bose company vs Arthur k. Moody was on trial and went to the jury.
 Tn the second division of the city court the case of w.. J. RandIe, administrator, vs. Birmingham Railway. Light and Pow CT company was concluded and went to the jury at o'clock
 In the third division of the city court the case of London Canada vs. Birming- ham Railway, Light and Power company was concluded and resulted in a verdict for the defendant.
 The case of John Gyton vs. Southern Express company was concluded and went to the jury at o'clock.
 Unreached cases on the weeks docket will be- called in the city court today.
 Chancery Court.
 In the chancery court yesterday de- crees were rendered in the following cases:
 Lizzie Wise vs. Walter Wise, dis missed for want of prosecution; W. V. Hoke vs. Ella Jarrett ct als.. decree of reference; Rudolph Richards ct als. vs. Steiner Brothers. order allowing complainant to amend bill; F.. w. Fucker vs. w. C. Shackleford ct als.. order allowing complainant to refile answer to bill D. T. Allen ys. E. F. Enslen ct als.. decree everything motion