The Washington herald., 1907-03-16

Easterling - Horning: bill q exceptions sub
mitted and signed Plaintiffs attorneys, Wilson q
BsTksdsle. defendants attorneys Tucker 4 Kenyon
Van NCrsdale vs. Washington Times I0mpan5
bond for costs on appeal fixed az $50. Plaintlf s
attorney. C. l. Frailey; defendants attorney WI
ton J. Lambert.
Miller vs. Washington and Gettysburg Railway
Company; motion for new trial granted and case
set foF March 3. Plaintiff attorney George W
Drew. defendants attorney J. b. lauer.
Hszard IS. Riley; motion for Jadgment granted
Plaintiffs attorney. Victor H. Wallace; defend
ants attorneys. Douglas Douglas
Ashton a Wyie vs Parker et al. motion Tor
judgment against T. S Wescott granted Plaintiff S
attcrneys Wells Hoover & Wells.
Morris vs.. Clark. motion for new tlal MED
Plaintiffs attorneys. Wolf Rosenberg; defend
ants attorney. II. + Davis
Assignments Tor Monday. March y, 1907:
No. ~ Cave vs.. McDemott Attorneys, II. Z.
Davis and e. {. Tucker-J. j. Darlington
No 4e National Soda Fountain Company vs.
AHleck. Attorneys. 5. 7. Thumas-W. Il, Aoker
and 7. Percy Myers.
No. ts7 Laurel Clay Products Company Vs Cook-
Attorneys " d. DaTidse-C. ". Darr.
No. $50 Newton IS. Columbia Railway Company.
Attorneys A. Z. Webb. J Darlington
No f71 Poster vs.. sand Filtration Corporation
Attorney 3. T. Doyle-Douglas Douglas and
/. J. Msther
Ne, 473 TAYLOR vs TAYLOR. Attorneys, J. ".
JeuuiHgs-Padgstt Forrest
No. 975 Hight vs.. Moore. Attorneys, A. G. Brad
Iey-A A. Birney.
No ga Jackson vs. Waters Attorneys. A G.
Bsntley- MILAN & Saith
No. lsl Reed vs Steele Attorneys. c. Caring
ton and Irving wnliamson-w. c. & A o. Gle
Circuit Court No. 2.
JUSTICE ANDERSON.
Moore Is Hight; motion for new trial granted
Plaintiffs attorneys John Rid0lt and Leo sin
mons; defendants attorneys, II. 5. Matthews and
+. A. Bowen. r.
Parker vs.. American HyEienic Brick and Tile
FireurOofng Company; motion 70 dismiss Iarnish-
meut orsrruled Plaintiffs attorney. Philip Walker
defendants attorney. John Rid0ut,
Palmer vs.. Palmer; demurrer % pleas sustained,
with Ten DAYS 70 plead. Plaintiffs attorney. ;. c,
Peelie; defendants attorneys Blrney NcodaTd-
Scott Ts. Herrel; time 10 present bali Of ex-
ceutims and fle transcript extended 20 April D.
Plaintiffs attorneys, J. T. Roller and ". Stras-
burger. Defendants attorneys. Irving Williamson
and " Mosby Williams
Dove vs. Karrick: motion for leave 10 hle addi-
tional pleas granted and leave 10 withdraw motion
FOR judgment granted. Plaintiffs attorneys Browne.
Britton & Hoehling; Defendants attorneys, MILAN
a Smith.
Polling vs.. CAPITAL Traction Company; ordered re-
stored % calendar. Plaintiffs attorney, H II.
Classic; defendants attorneys, Il. Ross Perry a
Son
Brown IS STANDARD on Company. leave 20 file
amended declaration within ten days Plaintiff s
attoruey, ". q. Gardine-: Defendants attorney. a.
l. Sinclair.
S0msrTille vs.. Flllius; judemcut By defsult for
s3f5s2 Plaintiffs attorney, J. Dawson Williams
Washington vs.. Reavis, motion for leave 70 amend
overraled. Plaintiffs attorney. L. J. MatheT, de
fendant-s attorneys BraEdenburg & Braudenburg
and X. Ross PeTy & son
Fsrran vs. District q Columbia; leave 70 amend
declaration forthwith granted. Plaintiffs attorneys.
J. ]. Darlington snd ". II. Sholesi defendants at
torney. Z. Il. Thomas.
Arnold vs Booth motion for new usl FLED.
Plaintiff attorneys. Wolf Rosenberg; defendant s
attorney. T. A. Jones.
Assignments for Monday. March Is. 1907
No. fji Cook Us. C0wsill ct al Attorneys. Col
dren & Fenning-L- e. Williamson and Hamilton.
Colbert 4 Hamilton
No. 5l2 FaTsu IS District Of Columbia. Attor-
neys. J. J. Darlington and ". H. Sholes-E. II.
Thomas.
No SO Fletcher IS. Anacostia and Potomac
Rai!road Company. Attorneys. B. T. Doyle-J. J..
Darlington.
No. s. Thomas rs. Washington Railway and
Electric Company. Attorneys. W. ]. LAMBERT. J.
Darlington.
No. ~ Catholic University of America vs.. Wag-
gamau. Attorneys. Hamilton Colbert X Hamilton
". F. MaJtingly. J. =. Larner and Arthur Peter.
No I7ok Clara Us Washington and southern
Railway Company ATTORNEYS. L. J. MatheT-Hsm-
ilton Colbert q Hamilton.
No 40 Cover vs.. Southern Railway Company
Attorneys, Psdsett & Forrest-Hamilton. Colbert *
Hamilton.
M. n6 Barnes vs.. Slater. Attorneys, Turner *
Mitcher-GeoTse +. Williams.
No l56. Talbot vs. ACDermott Attorneys. b r.
LeiCht0n-J. J. Darlington.