The Mount Holly news. [volume] (Mount Holly, Burlington Co., N.J.) 1891-1942, 1906-04-24

If the sheriff had been careless but no
wilful he would not be liable.
| This matter should be carefully inves
tigated. In one instance particularly tn
grand inquest can give the cour
valuable assistance and that will
be by discovering how many persons
were present at the execution
The court has the reports of the iuriel
which were filed in the clerks Office &C
cording to law, but after reciting those
legally entitled to be present the reports
say land many others" So the court II
actually without information on this
point and the jury has it within its power
to supply this information, for If there
were as many present as has been report
ed somebody must have admitted them.
Judge Hendrickson told the jury he was
sorry to have taken so much of its time on
this subject, but he felt it his duty to
give the matter full investigation. To
have such alleged acts occur In any
place was bad, but to have them happen
within shadow of the temple of justice
was an additional gravity and he desired
thorough investigation.
Following is list of causes for the pres
ent term of court
NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT.
Susan T. Loid VS.. ]. 8. Rogers & Co. In Tort.
John W. Wescott. E. A. Armstrong. Notice
March 26, 1905.
Thomas Quinn VS.. Board of Chosen Freehol-
nj Rnrli nrfn nfv In T<.r u d
1905. -
Tort. 7. j.. Middleton, Joseph L. Thomas.
Notice April 4, 1905. Referred to Circuit Court
Harold B. Wells vs. Inhabitants of the city
Walker, e. B. Leaning Notice March Is, 1905.
Christopher Kasparatis VS.. AQuilla Jones
and A. ElweI Gaskill. In Tort. John Ii.
1905. -
Artillias A. Anderson vs. PENNSYLVANIA Rail.
samuel W. sRinn, GasKin o1 GasEi "SSs ot,cs
March 26 1905.
George ". A. French, Administrator, VS.
John 81. Boswell. On contract. Walter A,
iBaaadrrows, Apgar & Boswell. Notice April 10,
BURLINGTON CIRCUIT COURT.
Eliza M. Evans vs. William j. Evans ct ais
rael Roberts. Notice March %, 1905.
, Hall Carpenter VS. John s. Maxim On
Sontracti aaron ~, y. Burr, George M. Hillman.
Theodore B. Gaskiil and George Campbell
vs. Siiayton Hancock; In Replevin: Samuel
26 1906.
Wilt shinn VS.. Michael Heavers. On Con-
.Tact. :; A. Atkinson, George M. Hillman.
Nottce March q, 1905.
Ella H. Flagg, Jr., VS.. Rebecca w. Deacon.
IN contract. Reginald Branch, Samuel w.
Sh1nn Samuel A. Atkinson. Notice April g. |
1906 -
:, Manufacturers Publishing Co. VS.. John v.
ReQ1pal0 Branch NnftaQ
y. q. Graves Co., Incorporated, VS.. Gamblos |
Co., Builders, etc, Alfred Ernest Woodman, |
eph Kaighn. William ID. Lippincott. Notice |
\ pril ID, 1905.
y. 2; Graves Co., Incorporated, VS.. Gamblos
/. Co, Builders, etc, Alfred Ernest Woodman,
aortgagee. On Contract. Joseph Kaighn. |
William d. L1ppincott. Notice April 10, 1905 |
BURLINGTON COMMON PLEAS
APPEAL CASES.
Frank R. Kelvey, Appellee, VS.. Peter Her
llg s,, appellant e. P. Budd, B. II. White.
John Egan, Appellee, VS. Pennsylvania R.
& Co., Appellant A. E. Burr. Justice Petit
ia r, R. Co, Appellant. A. +. Burr.
,ppelIant; !. G. Hendrickson, Ernest Watts
Isaac w. Rogers, Appellee, VS. Peter Hernig.
appellant. E. P. Budd, 8. W. shinn. Justice
BENJAMIN R. Powell vs. Peter Herring. Ap-
ellant E. p Budd, s. w. shinn. Justice
Oyce.
Benjamin White, Appellee, vs. Peter Her.
lg, Appellant. E. P. Budd, 8. w. Shinn.
William H Reeves, Appellee VS. Peter Her.
ustice Joyce.
J. Colby Montgomery, Appellee, vs. Penn
yxanla T. +. Co., Appellant. 8. W. shinn.
George Kasparatis, Appellee, vs. Burlington
ounty r. r. Co., Appellant. e. p Budd
ohm II. Backes Justice Magee Demand for
lry filed 4th month 18th '06 |,
Bordentown Reservoir and Water Co., APP
ellant, VS. William G. Steele, Appellee ]. a.
hutchinson s. F. Garrison. Justice Burns Il
I. b Luzier d Son, Appellee, VS.. John w.
ustice Carr.
William g. Lawton VS.. John Shinn vroom,
nc k1nson d Scannel j. G. Hendrickson. In
Ort, Replevln.
Ohio Copper Co.. Appellee, vs.. George T.
I1ddietoD, Appellant A. E. Burr, W. A