Missouri Valley times. [volume] (Missouri Valley, Iowa) 1874-1931, 1906-04-05
Council Proceedings.
ntinuel from Wednesdays dali


There being no decision, it was moved
and seconded that the Council proceed
to take the third ballot. Carried.
a call of the roll showed the follow
ing result, toMt: llosbrook voted for
Walker, Watkins for Walker; Gilmore,
Tanisica and Evans for Riley, and
Leet for Fry
There being no decision, it was
move and seconded that the Council
proceed To take the fourth ballot. Car
ricd
y call OF thcroll resulted as follows,
towit Ilosbrook and Watkins voted
for Walker G ilnorc for RILEY; rarni-
siea for Alexander, Evans and l.ect for
Fry
There being no decision it was moved
and seconded chat the Council proceed
TO lake the fifth ballot. Carried
a call of roll RESULTED, us follows, to-
wit Hosbrook and Watkins voted for
Walker: Gilmore for Riley; Tamsica
and Evans for Alexander and Leet for
! Fry
There being no decision it was moved
and seconded that the Council proceed
TO take the sixth ballot. Carried.
a call Of roll resulted as follows, to-
wit Iosbrook and Watkins votcl for
Walker, Gilmore for Riley; Tamisca
and Evans for Alexander, and Lcct for
Walker
There being no decision ii was moved
and seconded that the Council proceed
to take the seventh ballot Carried.
\ call of ioll resulted as follows, to-
wit Watkins and losbrook voted for
alker; Gilmore for Riley; Tamisiea
for Alexander, Evans for Fry, and Leet
| for Walker.
| There being no decision ii was moved
and seconded that tine Council proceed
TO take the eighth ballot. Carried.
y roll call resulted rs follows towit
lIosbrooll and Watkins voted for Walk
er, Gilmore and Tamisiea for Riley
| Evans for fry and Lcet for Walker
There being no decision it was moved
and seconded that the Council proceed
To take the nincth ballot Carried.
y roll call resulted as follows, towit
llosbrool and Watkins voted for Walk.
er. lcet for Fry; Gilmore for Riley
Evans and Tamsica for FRY.
There being no decision ii was moved
and seconded that the Council proceed
to take the tenth ballot. Carried.
| y roll call resulted as follows: towt
tlosbrook and Watkins Voted for Walk
er; Lcct for Fry, Gilmore for Riley
Evans and Iamisiea for Fry.
/ There being no decision il was moved
and seconded that the Council proceed
to take the eleventh ballot Carried.
| A call of the roll resulted as follows
towit: Hosbrook and Watkins vote.
for Walker; Leet for Fry; Gilmore TO
Riley; Evans and Tamisica for Alex
amber
| There being no decision it was move,
and seconded that the Council procce,
to take the twelfth ballot. Carried.
y call of the roll resulted as follows
towit Hosbrook and Watkins vote,
for Walker; Icct and Evans for FRY
Gilmore and 'ramisiea for Alexander
There being no decision it was move,
and seconded that the Council proceed
to take the thirteenth ballot Carried
\ call of the roll resulted as follows
towit: Hosbrock and Watkins votet
for Walker Gilmore FIR Riley; Leet
Evans and 'ramisiea for Fry.
i There being no decision ii was move,
and second that the Council proceed Il
take the fourteenth ballot. Carried.
A call of the roll resulted as follows
loNit 4~SCl NotCl ioI ITV, Natk1n
and Hosbrook for Walker; Gilmore 70
Alexander; Evans and Tamisiea TO
Fry.
There being no decision Ii was move,
and seconded that the Council procee,
to take the fifteenth ballot. Carried
The roll call resulted as follows, to
wit: Watkins voted for Fry; Leet an,
Hosbrook for Walker; Evans and Tam
isiea for Fry; Gilmore for Riley.
There being no decision it was move,
and seconded that the Council proceed