Bisbee daily review., 1906-04-24
TE BeEE DAILY REvEW ssBeE ARIZONA
APRIL TERM OF COURT
ONLY ELEVEN GRAND JURORS REPORT AND SPECIAL vENiRE
 IS ORDERED.
Especial to Review)

to order at e:S0 o'clock this morn- l ing, Judge Fletcher M Doan, presid- | ing. with c. W. Wilcox. clerk. The return of the sheriff of the grand jurors summoned showed the follow ing to be present: John Gleason. | Henry Clifford. L. S. Gamble. B. B. | Hohstadt. James Farley, Fred He'd berg, Vim. Cowan. Dave Cohn. J. M. Crosby. T. D. Davis and NJ. F. Caste | nada. The balance of the regular drawn | venire the sheriff was unable to find with the exception of four. Messrs. | Henry, Fisher, Gwynn and Cummings, who were excused for good and suffi- cient reasons. A special venire was ordered drawn to be returned on Tuesday at o'clock the sheriff being instructed to get the jurors from Bisbee. Douglas. Benson and other places as the judge did not deem it a good plan to fill the majori- | ty of the grand jury up from citizens of one town of the county as would have been the case If the entire ten were taken from Tombstone.
 A temporary call of he calendar was had and a few cases set. The regular call of the calendar will be had on Wednesday morning at which time the court requests that all attorneys having cases for trial and wishing them to be set be on hand. The trial jury will not be called until May 14. it being expected that it will take all of this week and next to investigate the cases coming before the grand jury. In the case of J. P. Camou vs Anisa. ct al. involving the title to the San Ra- faeI Del valle land grant. lying along the San Pedro between Lewis Springs and Hereford, judgment was given to the plaintiff. The case of Martin Costello vs the Copper Bell Mining company will come up for trial on Thursday. In the cases of Wm. welgehausen and wife against the International American and Douglas Dispatch for | damages, a jury was demanded by the i plaintiff The cases will not be set down for trial. however. before the 1 demurrers to the complaint have been | heard.
 In the case of Franklin vs Trickey, ! which was tried here at the last term of the district court on a change of venire from Santa Cruz county, a stay of proceedings was granted upon the | order made in the case on Saturday | in which W. G. Gilmore was appoint i ed trustee to take an inventory of the
 stock at Harshaw, and D. L. Cunning
 ham was appointed referee. The mat ter Is now under settlement and may
 be fixed up without the expense of l the trustss's administration
 The case of c. C. Berry vs the Ari-
 zona Mining & Development company, involving mining stock in the corpora ton, was dismissed on motion of the plaintiff as the case had recently been settled out of court
 In the case of Neal & Hysum vs Taylor a dimissal was ordered on mo- tion of the attorney for the plaintiff.
 The damage case of c. D. Walker vs E. W. Emmons ct al was also dis
 missed upon a similar motion.
 The appeal case of Donovan ys
 EweiI. of Douglas. was set for trial
 June IS.
 Case of Naco Lumber company vs
 Jas. Heron set for Apri; 2s.
 The divorce case of Wales vs Wales
 is set for May 5.
 Tn the case of vande Walker vs
 Baldwin. regarding title to Bisbee [ next on demurrer.
 Case of Bostwick vs Whitney for debt was set for May 5.
 In a number of cases juries were demanded by the parties to the suit.
 but the cases were not set and will not be until after the criminal busi-
 ness has been disposed of so that a : definite time might be set.
 The calendar will take considerable time to dispose of and Judge Doan expects to keep on with the trial of
 cases until the first of August if ne-
 cessarg- to dispose of the business and clean the business up for once, which [ has not been done for number of ' years in the county. There are forty
 four divorce cases now on the caien-
 dar and one or two more that have lnot been placed there as yet. , In the case of Sinaonia Waters vs i A. J. Shropshire for damages the je- r murrer to the plaintiffs complaint :. was sustained and the plaintiff grant l ed leave fo amend
 In the case of L. Bonebrake vs R. s : Hunt ct al. for damages arising out oi . an alleged arrest made by Deputy s Young Davis at Douglas. the demur- b Ter to the plaintiffs complaint wa' F sustained. the court holding that un- | der the complaint the sheriff was not
 Irresponsible for the acts of his deputy