Every evening, Wilmington daily commercial., 1906-05-28
MANY CASES SETTLED
IrclpdiDg The Suits Of lhs Wilmington
City Against The New Castle
Railway Co.
ALSO THE H. F. DUNCAN CASE
Which Was an Action Against
the City of Wilmington.
ONE DAMAGE SUIT WAS DISMISSED

No cases appearing for trial, the
gurerior Court adjourned this morn
,nr until Thursday morning and the
iurv was discharged untll that time.
Matter II. Hayes, counsel for the
plaintif, informed the court that it
would not be bothered with the case
of the Wilmington City Railway Co.
vs. the Wilmington & New Castle
Electric Railway Co, as settlement
would be made.
Reuben Satterthwaite, representing
the plaintiff reported settlement OF
the case OF Herman +. Duncan VS.. the
Mayor and Counsel of Wilmington.
This involved an accident in Brandy
wine Park.
william S. Hilles, representing the
National Dredging Co, filed excep-
tons to the ruling Of the court In the
case of the National Dredging Co. vs.
Farmers Bank, which was a suit TO
recover money from the bank alleged
10 have been paid out of the dredging
company's funds upon altered checks
Marvel g. Marvel, representing the
Pan American Co., in the action
brought against It by Count Henri de
Tulvecourt, were refused an extension
of 60 days for making return to a writ
of mandamus to compel the company
10 produce its books for the inspec-
ton of Count de Julvecourt. The
court gave sufficient time for making
the return correctly.
Walter II. Hayes, counsel for the
defence. informed the court that the
cases Of Mary and Poneicki and Alex
ander Liczerski against the Whining
IA v,
tried. as a settlement had been agreed
upon.
In the case of Francis L. Farrell
against the p, b. & W. Railroad Co &,
i. r. Cochran, counsel for the plain
tiff, asked the court 20 enter iudg-
ment for the defendant, for costs.
The request was granted.
w. f. Kurtz, counsel for the defend
ant reported that the cases of William
T. Connor, Peter p. Ford and Thomas
7. Magarty against Henry h. Smith,
were settled.
The case Of James r. White VS.. the
Wilmington City Railway Co. was set
for trial on June 18th.
The case Of John +. Taylor, late
sheriff Of New Castle county, vs.
Thomas J. Burris and Charles II.
DullN ADMIN l5LidlOls Was ltltlA6Q "
counsel for settlement.
Because Of the failure of the plain
tiff To appear the case of Maria dc
Slmone vs.. p, B. & ". r. r. Co., was
dismissed.
Leonard E. Wales, who represented
the plaintiff, stated that she lived In
Italy and that be had asked for several
continuanoes, but had promised II.
h. Ward, counsel for the defence, that
he would not ask for a further con
tinuance. He asked that his name b'
stricken from the case as counsel
His request was granted.
Upon the application Of Mr.. Ward
the plaintiffs name was called severa
times and there being no response the
case was dismissed.
The case of W. +. Main Co. vs.
George b. Pearson was continued be
cause of the illness Of +. II. Hofeckeri
counsel for the plaintiff. Martin b
Burrls represents Mr.. Pearson.
The case Of Raymond Meredith vs.
The Peoples Railway Co., was con
tinued
The case Of William @. Hamilton vs.
the p, b. & W. r. h. Co., was re
ported settled. w. S. Hilles repre-
sented the plaintiff.
j. Frank Ball, counsel for the plain
TIL in the case Of Alfred Cleaver d
b. a. vs.. State of Delaware p. b. r.
reported the case settled. Attorney
General Richards is counsel for tn
State.