Albuquerque morning journal., 1906-09-25
BOTH GRAND jUR|ES
At WORK IN THE
COURT HOUSE
TERRITORIAL JURY WAS
EMPANELED YESTERDAY
Matters Concerning Himself to
Come Before Jury Cause
ExCuSing of F. A. HubbelI
From Jury Duty,

Business became very, very good in !
the county court house yesterday af-
ternoon, when in addition to the Unit |
ed States grand jury which Is still in
session. the territorial grand jury was
empanelled by Judge Abbott in
structed as to its duties and Dut to
work
A considerable number oe excuses
were made to the court by Albuquer-
que business men and several of these
were SO urgent that the court granted
them. Among other things in the
forming of the grand jury. District At
torney Clancy asked that Frank A.
Hubhell, who had been drawn as one
of the jurors. be excused from jury
duty. Mr.. Clancy explained that mat
ters concerning Hubbel would be
presented to the jury and that, there
fore. he would not be a proper man
for jury service. The court promptly
excused Hubbell from service.
The jury was then empanelled with
G. O. Cushman as foreman and Edu-
ardo Chaves as interpreter. The
membership of the jury is as follows:
Santiago Baca Joe Gutierrez, Cor
nelio GabaldOn. Ricardo Sanchez, JUS
10 Montoya, c. o. Young. Elesio SAM
chez. Jesus Garcia. r. F. Welsh, Juan
Baca y Salazar, Frank Hopping, Louis
Tafoya. Manuel Candelaria, Ramon
Nuanes, Jacob Korber. c. o. Cushman,
Tomas r. Duran, Miguel Garcia, A. 5.
Dickerson, Alfredo Apodaca, Henry
Bramlett.
The territorial petit jury was also
empanelled as follows: James stew
art, Pedro Martinez, Pedro Garcia y
Apodaca Vidal Santillanes, Jacob
Loeb, Elias Garcia Sebronio Archebita,
Pablo Griego, Jose de la Cruez, Albert
Luna, Felix Montoya, Louis Otero, Ri
cardio Garcia, Louis Sanchez. Jose
Cripion. r. Chavez, Anastacio Gomez,
Florencio Lucero. Francisco Garcia,
Francisco Griego, II. II. Chess Mo-
desto Serna and Pablo Anjures
The first case taken up before the
grand jury on the territorial side yes
terday was that against w. ]. Hous-
ion, former Santa Fe employe. who
is charged with forging a railroad
pass. 1t is understood that the case
against Ira b. Ritter, charged with
burglary, will be taken up today.
There are several other important
matters TO come before this grand
jury which may be in session until
next week.
United States Court.
The United States grand jury con-
tinued its work yesterday and will be
in session until tomorrow night and
perhaps for another day.
Yesterday Judge Abbott discharged
the United States petit jury no fur
ther business being ready for presen-
tatl0n before this term of court In
the case of the United States against
TranquiinO Gonzales, charged with
robbing postoftice at Cabezon OF
March 80. 1905. the government dis
missed the case with leave to re- in
state.
The court then took up the civ
cases on the docket. The cases of the
Lawyer Publishing company VS.. Johr
II. Stnge and Trotter VS. Stingle
were taken up and judgment rendered
in both cases by default.
The case of Robert DrOss VS.. Levy
Brothers. a suit on contract judgmen
for $50 and costs of suit was rem
dered
The case OF the Puritan Manufac
turin company VS. Toti e Gradi wa
taken up yesterday afternoon, an,
was on trial when court adjourned.
In the case of the Territory VS.
Neill b. Field, suit arising from tn
fact that the defendant returned hi
assessment to J. M. Sandoval instea
of George F. Albright during the tim
of the contest between the two me
for the assessors office, Judgment wa
rendered for the defendant.
The court announced that the fol
lowing cases noticed for trial at tn
September, 1906. term of court, woul
be considered as set for trial on tn
twenty-sxth day of September, unles
the parties interested would call tn
cases in open court for different sci
ting prior to that date, as follows:
Cases noticed for tria! Septembe
Cifcally set:
No. 6730-Cleland vs. Alexander.
No. 6766--Trujillo VS.. Y. Alderet
No. 6777-KnOuss VS.. Purse.
No. 6S36-F. c. de Baca VS.. Wi
broom.
No. 6S63-Masetti VS.. Schwartzma
No. 6S65-Corcoran VS.. TractiC
company.
No 68S6--Davis Co. Wilson.
No 6S95-McConnell VS.. Ross.
No 6959-Fullerton VS.. Mayberry
No. 6759-Eberhart VS.. Wrissheel.
No. 69S0--Trotter VS. Stingle.
No. 6173--Di Palma VS.. Weinman
No. 7014-Gallegos VS.. Mandel.
No. 7063-State National Bank '
Ackerman ct al
No. Westbrook VS.. Electr
Light company
No. 7O95--Duran VS.. Perez.
No. 677S--Otero VS.. City.
No. 7101-Otero VS.. CITY.
No. 7115-Sisler VS. Telegraph cor
pany.
No. 7166-Toti VS.. Brewery Co.
No. 7167-Otero VS.. City.
No 7177-COllomba vs.. Armijo
Otero.
No. 2-sehoenberger VS.. Benj
min g. Co.
No 7197-Hust VS., Dunnigan.
No. 7204-Futrelle vs. Knapp.
No. 4907-Scanlon vs.. Cresce
Coal company.
She Found Relief.
II you are troubled with liver col
plaint and have not received he
read this. Mrs. Mary Il. Hammer
Moody Texas. Il was in pc
health-with liver trouble-for oy
Mnnr nnnInre did mo no nnnl q