Weekly Arizona journal-miner. [volume] (Prescott, Ariz.) 1903-1908, 1906-05-30
Directors Dooley Seek to Have H. A.
Suite Arrested For Embezzlement--
Serious Charges Made and Answered.
Attorney Talbot Pours in Hot Shot
On the Controversy.

torney Talbot securing it that after.
noon, and at this date, Saturday after.
noon. May 20, he has absolutely failed
and refused to allow the sheriff = office
to serve the warrant, although urged
TO dbo NO, also in face Of the fact that
our company Is ready and willing and
has offered TO him to employ an ut.
torney TO help prosecute, and take the
entire burden in the matter.
at is rank steal Of nearly $4,000
Of the company's money, and IL only
one Of the fragrant abuses Of q trust.
ed position by this man Suttlc. We
have no comments TO make upon the
district attorneys office. save simply
to state the facts, but it seems strange
and outrageous TO MS TO have man
who has stolen our money walking
your streets and laughing at us through
the inactivity Of your district.attor
ney's office. Can not we get justice
1.-The individual mcmb::s Of this
company are interested in several other
mining properties in this county, and
they are willing TO-, and in the past
have placed large sums Of money in
the mining industries Of this county,
and all Of them expect to do more in
that line in the near future; but such
things as this almost discourage us
from taking any part in the affairs Of
this county Where is our protection
II we cannot get justice in such "A
ease as this what are we to expect in
other circumstancesf
eve are determined to sift this
matter TO the bottom, and IL there IL a
way. and II Justice can be obtained,
we intend 20 see that every guilty
party connected with this deal Is sen,
TO the penitcntiary."
suttic's Warm Reply.
la reply 10 the charges made by II
l.. Doolcy, the following statement wa'
made last night by II. A. Suttlc:
Apparently there has been nc
much publicity made Of the Cypress
deal that I would think the people OF
Prescott would be tired OF II, but IL
Justice to myself I will say, that the
misrepresentation made by the
Dooleys has no doubt given the public
the wrong impression, and as there
are always two sides to n question,
wish 10 state the following facts:
"In the first place, my connection
with the sale and purchase Of the Cy
press mine was that Of a mining brok
or, and not as agent for the Dooleys o
the Cypress company.
81 emphatically deny that the Doc
ieys or anyone else ever paid me
single dollar for expenses or service
in this transaction. ] came to Ari
zona. and sseured nm option in my owl
name Of the property in question
and afterwards laid tn" proposition
down 70 these people TO accept or re
ject. and they accepted II. but neve
chirped about me being their agent
nor did they ever offer to pay my e,
penses or for services rendered. u
fact, they knew and expected that
would get a commission from the selic
of the property. They are bus'neS
men enough to know that mimi
man would not 20 from Illinois to Ar
zona and put in two or three week
looking for a property, and do II JUS
for fun.
"My services and expenses In 60"
ing to Arizona on this business "ef
never paid by any individual OF tn
CYPRESS company nor the Cypress co"
: many i,ssn. bss cost me personally se'
, o,aI hundred dollars. The only none
I ever received from the Cypress con
many was the sum Of $50 per mont
for about five months M payment
| services rendered as secretary nm
, manager Of the Cypress eompan!
. which they insisted upon me t"kin
. until I could prepare their Pro-pee''
and attend to the work OF this ofh'
until Mr.. Dooley could take II owe
3 This money was in no wise eons'deIe
r than as reimbursement II
!, my ezpsusrs and services 'ehde,f
. these people prior to the ''san'1a''0
Of their company, and it never W.
intended so. l would never have ,a'
en- compensation from them as the
.g.n, for the reason that ] wa" nc
/. ins for myself in the capacity 81
|, mining broker, and expected my con
m,s,ios from the seller Of the pro