The Birmingham age-herald., 1906-01-09

Office and Works-Fortieth $ Patrick Shields, NJ c. Dabbs, B. NJ Bra zeal. J. B. Smith.
 The organization of the second jury was not completed. and the sheriff was in- structed to summon a sufficient number Of additional talesmen to fill up the body.
 Two cases of assault with intent to mur- der against Levi Long were disposed or mol proseauies being entered by the pros eeuting attorneys.
 No other cases were taken up in the criminal court, number going over un- til today and others being continued until later dates in the term.
 The cases on the docket for today are as follows:
 Amos Johnson, larceny from a dweli- ing; Amos Johnson, grand larceny; West Johnson, larceny from a storei Bragg Hanley, larceny from person; Will Lytle. larceny from person; Jim Lawson, man. slaughter: Charles Grim, larceny from store; Arthur Folks and Louis Johnson. burglary and grand larceny; Will James, forgery. second degree; John William Lytle, forgery in the second degree, two indictments.
 Charles Foster. indicted for assault with intent to murder. was placed on trial in the criminal court yesterday The jury retired about 4 o'clock, and not having reached an agreement at 10 o'clock, was locked up for the night. In the city court the following is the jury for the present week. .I0hH Wall J. E. Hunt, w. z. Smithson. B. D. Palmer. S. V. Copeland r. E. Crow, W. l G. Smith. E. z. Acton. Iva J. w. Vines, c. ! c. Snider, l.. c. Browning, E. L. Swann, William Bryan, Thomas Kinnon, D. A. 1 Brock, H. L. Schmidt, J. D. McMichaus, W. B. Higgnbotham, R. M. White, A. w. l Goodson, J. w. Dial, w. E. Pond.
 The following cases were disposed of in 1 the second division:
 Dora Bonner vs. the Southern Mutual Aid association, judgment for plaintiff by default, for $62.5o
 Mrs w. S. Griffin vs. w. M. Craven, judgment for plaintiff by default, for $l5O.
 J. P Edwards vs. W. W. Mitchell ap peal dismissed.
 The docket for today is as follows: 1 Hamilton: Dave Homes, administrator, vs. Woodward Brown company; Frank Collins vs. Culpepper Exum; Edward c. 1 Brown vs Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company; William Shield vs. w. H. Batchelor & Co.,, Ltd, ct al; l w. R. Oates ys. Mrs. l.. L. Motion ct al; James Bloomburg, pro ami. vs. Bir- mngham Railway, Light and Power com- pany; R. R. Board vs. Nashville Roofing Paving company.
 Second division-Jonas Schwab ct al vs. Bettie McMath ct al; J. J. Crawford vs. l James E. Dedman; The Means and Fulton Iron Works vs. Birmingham Machine and 1 Foundry company; John F, Lewis vs. 1 Mrs. Jennies Coeiola ct al; Ex parte Su- l san Lunsford vs. Kansas City, Memphis and Birmingham Railroad company; Ala bama National bank vs. N. w. Henry; D. w Dean vs. Jebeles & Colias; George l A. Evans vs. Mrs Lula Harton ct al; Housman Brothers vs. Garland Wilson ct al; M T. H. Gibb vs Robert D. AleXan- der ct al; Singer Manufacturing com pany vs. S. H. King ct al.
 Two new suits were filed in the city court yesterday. both against the Bir- mingham Railway. Light and Power com pany. The plaintiffs Rosalenie Savarese l and Rosario Guercia in their petitions allege that they were passengers on car of the defendant company and were badly shaken up, causing injuries that necesstated expensive care and attention. They ask that the company be made la- J ble.
 Only one license to marry was issued at the probate court yesterday. The prin- cipals were John Lorke and Miss Mary Papson both of Brookside petition for division of property was filed in the chancery court yesterday by Inez Jones vs. Julia Edmondson ct al. In the case of Ida J. Nicholson vs. Ike l Nicholson the chancellor handed down decree confirming the report of the
 referee as to alimony and solicitors fee
 1 Juries for the present week were organ 1 ized in the circuit court as follows:
 Jury No. Robert H. Thomas, Pete ! Paris. T. N. Graham. w. P. Parsons, Henry E. Warner F. B. Sims, Josiah $. Russell, Olin w. Colgan. Ike Hicks, Dave Williams. J. T. Trammell, J. A. Belcher.
 Jury No. 2-T. B. Crane. E. A. Wilkey. John Salter, Allen Raiford, Eugene Todd. H. c. Cole, E. w. Flagler w. R. Tarrant. J. D. Carlisle, W. P. Morgan, w. H. Low 1 ins, A N. Aiken.
 i The following business was disposed of i in that court:
 1 Virgil Bullard vs. the Birmingham Rail- l way, Light and Power company; dis missed by the plaintiff. Sudie B. Holmes vs. the Birmingham Railway. Light and Power Company; judgment by consent for plaintiff for $2O.
 Andrew Moore vs. the St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad company, ct all; dis missed.
 The matter of J. F. Hollingsworth & l Co.,. vs. the City. of Ensley. was passed until Wednesday.
 Tnak nr1t far Kn0wlcdoo