Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1906-11-10
RRYAN COMMENTS
ON The ELECTION
pscrets Hearst's Defeat But Does
Not See Any Comfort for
The President.
IS PLEASED OVER MISSOURI.
ranks General Results Indicate a
Trend in Favor of the Demo.
cratic Party.

,,,coln. Mob, Nov. 9.--Comment-
49,, an Tuesdays election. William j.
swan gets onsiderable satisfaction In
,,sslns the outcome from Demo-
..,so standpoint He regrets the de-
,,st OF W. II. Hearst in New York,
~, cannot see wherein President
,.osovelt can ind any comfort IN the
"a. If the Empire state. Mr.. Bryan
,.,s the presidents personal attack on
a, Hearst was IN very bad taste, and
- nsists that the attack did not fav-
"..hlv impress the public.
particularly gratifying to the DEM
..gatic heart says Mr.. Bryan, is the
urn of Missouri TO the fold In n
,,s,sment issued tonight. Mr.. Bryan
says. .ooe
,,.,s IN favor Of the Democratic party
+, nroyes that the Democratic party is
rroving stronger as Republican poll
Eos are developed In New York the
,arty has won signal victory In
srte Of the tremendous efforts put
,.,,b In behalf Of the administration.
The Republicans had all the money
thsy wanted: they had the support of
an The great corporations, and at the
close they had whatever influence the
administration could lend.
nThe fact that the Democrats elect
"a every state officer excepting the
governor shows that In the Empire
| tate the Republican party has been
,epudiated. The defeat Of Mr.. Hearst,
NE Democratic and Independence
league candidate for governor, while
4 great disappointment to his friends
ana 70 the party, is explained by facts
which rob Mr. Hughes victory of both
plory and political significance. Mr..
NcCarsn. whom Mr.. Hearst denounc-
ca as boss, threw his influence TO
Hughes and cut down Mr.. Hearst's
tote IN Brooklyn. Mayor Mcclellan,
III, legality Of whose election Mr..
Hsarst had denied, used his influence
tor Mr. Hughes and cut down the
Htarst vote In New York Mr.. Jerome,
he prosecuting attorney OF New York
Who had also been attacked by Mr.
4 Hcarst supported the Republican
ticket and his influence was felt In
Greater New York. Mr. Croker, dur.
ing the last days OF the campaign,
made an attack upon Mr.. Hearst
which doubtless weakened the Demo-
cratic candidate among the Tammany-
ties Mr.. Murphy. the head of Tam
many while supporting the ticket.
QUA not put much enthusiasm into
We campaign. owing to the personal
Wnuoversies which he had had with
hr Hearst. II Is evident, therefore.
that Mr.. Hughes owes his victory not
y Republican votes, but to Democrats
foies brought 10 him BY the very men
fhom he and she Republican leaders
lave been denouncing for years
President Roosevelt cannot end
lety much cause for rejoicing I'm the
New York returns To have his own
safe 20 Democratic cannot be gratify-
Ns 10 him, and 10 find that his per-
pnal attack upon Mr.. Hearst had little
lMnce on the result compared with
ts influence exerted by McCarren.
pser and Murphy will not gladden.
| y thanksgiving day. The presidents
hsonal attack on Mr.. Hearst was in
~ taste, TO say the least. and that
" attack did not favorably impress
ne public, ought to be a warning for
De future.
Mr.. Hearst is, Of course, dlsap-
Nnted, and yet, when all the facts
Ie known. he has much to congratu-
a't himself upon. He made a tremen-
aous light against great odds and while
r. himself failed of election, his heroic
struggle brought victory to the rest of
NE ticket As the rest OF the ticket
s1ooq for the same principles for
winch he contended, it is evident thai
ae mas been INDICATED on the position
%ken' and this must be more crafty.
lHs 70 him than any personal victory