The true northerner. [volume] (Paw Paw, Mich.) 1855-1920, 1906-07-06
Circuit Court.

Circuit Court.
Since our last report the following
business has been transacted in the cir
cult court:
Jennie Xix vs. George w Cornish, eft
al; action Of trespass; appealed from JUS
tice court. The Jury, under instruction
of the court, returned a verdict for de-
PENDANTS.
Samuel E. Bridges VS. Nathaniel Cam
eron. This was the dog case" alluded
to in the last weeks Northerner. A
motion was made by plaintiffs counsel
that the damages be doubled as pro-
vided by statute. This motion was de.
MED on condition that plaintiffs costs
be paid in the sum of s62 80 otherwise
damages, which we're assessed by the
jury at 500, to be doubled
The people VS.. Earl Smith, alias
Franklin +. Bragg; larceny from dwell
ing house The respondent having
heretofore plead guilty, the court inn
posed sentence of not less than six
months nor more than five years at the
Ionia reformatory. Sheriff Britton
promptly conveyed the prisoner to that
institution.
Chauncey +. OcobocF vs.. William
Hoodemaker. This was an action on the
case for the loss of horse alleged to have
been overdriven by defendant The jury
favor of plaintiff. Counsel for plaintiff,
deeming that sum inadequate, moved
for new trial. This motion was denied
on condition that the defendant pay the
judgment with $40 costs on or before
August l. il not so paid new trial
granted.
Adde G. Baker VS.. Roy Hinckley; mo-
ton to set aside order for security for
costs; motion denied.
Amity Peterson VS.. John Peterson; d.
vorce; decree granted on ground OF de
sertiou
Adelbert Woodhouse vs.. Myrtle Wood
house; divorce: amended decree filed
granting divorce and providing for
division Of property.
Jennie Michels VS.. Howard MIchels:
divorce; decree granted on ground OF
non. support
Nellie NJ. Amos VS.. James Il. Amos:
decree granted on ground of non-sup-
port.
Matter of Almeua Creamery company;
decree granted dissolving corporation
and appointing M. j. Coy as receiver.
Young Ladies Academy VS.. Will II. S
Banks ct al; bill for accounting; decree
granted.
Mary A. Peterson VS.. Lottie q. Baker
ct al; bill to remove cloud from title; de
cree granted removing same and declar-
ing tax title to be void.
Bertha Martin VS.. George w. Fisher
ct al; motion for additional security for
costs; motion denied.
Dora Scott vs. Martha A. Brown; bill
OF complaint dismissed by stipulation.
Bert w. Pattisou vs.. Dora Pattison;
divorce; complainant ordered to pay ali
mony as follows: $50 solicitors fee, S45 as
expense Of procuring witnesses and $500
per week during tendency of suit.
James D.. Merrill vs.. Daniel G. Lessen
ring; motion for new trial. motion de-
MED. This was an action on the case 10
which plaintiff recovered judgment in
the sum of $500 for alienation of his
wife's affection.
Philip II. S. Jerue vs.. Dora b. Jerue;
divorce; complainant ordered 10 pay
temporary alimony as follows: sl5 So
licitor's fee and 81 per month during
pendercy Of suit also all expense OF trial
of cause.
Augusta Bujack vs. Louis Bujack;
divorce; defendant ordered to pay al
imony as follows $50 solicitors fee, S14
per month during tendency Of suit, and
all expenses OF trial of cause.
b. Desenberg & Co. vs.. Earl j. Gould;
motion for dissolution OF attachment;
motion dismissed.
Frederick Avery vs.. Hattie Avery; di-
vorce; complainant ordered to pay al
imony as follows sl5 solicitors fee, Sc
per month during tendency Of suit and
expenses OF trial.
Court adjourned without day.