The Cairo bulletin., 1906-05-15

4 ttili itNN ~ "'hiu ~ ihipo2nipic -
state all that was said in the confer
sence # two hours bu; I think a false
color is given to the conference by the
following statement;
= Informed The gentlemen Of my
bel 'ef that you desired after the scope
o fthe court review Were to be express
ed in the law at all that It would be
limited to the two subjects herein be-
fore named Gnterlocul0ry injunctiUns
and constitutionallty of the aci) that
IN such a case hc socaIled the Long
amendment was acceptable to Won;
that YOU would be glad 10 see a rigid
Limitation on the issuance of the IN
'terlooHtory injunction il The limitation
were possible ana | sta ed further that
would not assume TO agree 20 any
form Of language whatever, for you
but would submit any proposed amend.
ment 70 you for your consideration. I
also stated my doubt, whether in any
event, il would be possible TO enact
proposition ent rely forbiddlng inter
lOcutiry Injunction, ! found my entire
accord with Senator Baiiev as TO the
rules Of the constitutional law app'i,
cable o the situation with the excep-
tion of these relating to the power Of
congress to forbid all interlocutory ln-
iTr-cfi5ns tfron,4vhi<h dit not oGeF-
any final opinion, only aylng that the
Bailey argument needed an answer
An attempt was then made TO adopt
The phraseoIogy which would effect the
intention Of the two senators. made
some notes upon this branch Of the
subject and at the close Of he inter
view said 10 Bailey that | wculd put !
my understanding of their views upOa !
The question of phraseology in writing I
end it TO him and, if it met with his /.
APPROVAL submit Il to you"
The draft was submitted TO Bailey I
1ext day Continuing Moody says:
The conference among Democratic |
members Of the senate hen occurred /
he press reports of which indicated |
here was not entire agreement among
hem. Tilman, however, called TO as
sure me cf the prospects of an agree
nent among a large number of Demo
cratic senators was good. ! heard
70 hing further from aBiley until a
'ater date | Informed You Of whGi
occurred at the Interview, but not the
.wo senators and me and you told me
YOU had been Informed from various
Democratic sources that an agreement
among Democrat upon any amend.
nent would be impossible The two
senators called uponme again on tho
!3rd and gath of ADril There was
me furthcr talk about the form Of
ha amendment. The egggestion was
made thar u m cht be pos ible after
voting on the provision forbidding all
utcrlocutory injuncliors. to agree up.
IN am amendment which should in.
dude the Long amendment and what
as heen known as The Overma1
meuImcnt then said that in my
DiniOn any amendment drawn by anv
me representing the executive branch
II government, even though il were
inspired from heaven, would not be &C. s
optcd without change by the senate. I
That tha attitude was natural and {
'roper a2d that II the exact language 5
4 the amendment which could he ,
donted should be agreed upon. e s
ueht to be drawn by the senators Z
hemselve-. s." "ggested Allison as T
he proper person for further confer
nee ard the matte as fa~ as I was
oncerned. ended there I remember q
caring nothing Of it uatil was just
bout taking a train fer North Caro-
ma May 4lh. when 7 was informed by y
il'mau and Chandler that YOU he'd I
ppr yed another amendment known i
8 tie Allison amendment There was q
0thnr I'm the O-yersafiou- botwe n 81
h @ senator's and me- which n any way 9
Quad you to any particular, amend o
lcnt or in The Sigh est degree i'm II
airei your liberty at any time 30 8
10 anvamendment which you C
rquisrce 10 any amendment which y0u {
lterest