davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1906-05-10
ONLY GODDARD
TO Be NAMED
10 Countsnominaon Is Expected Al Saturday Afternoons
Convention, Though Those Who Favor the Selection Of a
Straight Democrat May Express Their Views and Let II Go
At That and Then United Party Will Enter Upon the
Campaign Of The People Against the Republican Machine

The Democratic state central commit
tee is very busy preparing for the con-
vention to be held Saturday.
II has already been decided that
Chairman Fitzsimmons and Secretary
Gaslkin shall be the temporary officers
OF the conventions; but not until this
evening is II expected that who shall
be the permanent officers OF the con-
vention will have been decided.
The man 10 nominate Col. Goddard
as a candidate for United States sena-
tor has not yet been selected, either
There is no doubt but that the NOM
ination VIII practically be unanimous
as II is said that there will be no
counter-nomination, although those
who believe that straight democrat
should be the nominee, may voice that
opinion and let IL go at that
On the whole, the proposed nomina-
The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1906-05-10

tion OF Col. Goddard is meeting with
expressions or general approval from
who have brought about his cand dacy
say they believe his nomination will
produce the largest Democratic vote In
the history OF the party, as a large
number OF Republicans will desert that
party and swell the already large lnde-
pendent vote.
The people are rapidly awakening TO
the fact that an opportunity TO secure
elf-goyernment is at hand: and il is
believed that the corrupt and tyran-
nical Republican machine may be over
thrown, horse and rider
Whatever action the convention shall
take, IL is the general belief that Il
Will be heartily endorsed by the Dem
ocrats and Independents throughout the
state, and that united party front
will be presented in the campaign OF
the people against corrupt Republican
misgovernment.
The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1906-05-10
BOMB EXPLOSIONS LAID
TO ANARcHISTIC PLOTS

Paris. May 1o-The police authorities
explosions with a widespread Nihilistic
organization. This has led To a number of
unconfrmed reports that the bombs we're
intended 10 be used on the occasion Cf
the opening OF the Russian pai iliament C.
day TO blow up distinguished Russian per
sonages The police believe they are on
the train OF an extensive revolutionary
organization.
The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1906-05-10

The very safest investment for
q business house or a business
man Is advertising. ~ a store or
an individual has something to sell
the public let them know about IL
through Tho News.
Bisbee daily review., 1906-02-25

B. S. Pelzer and Edward Switzer at the foot of the paper hereto annexed Is their true and genuine signatures, made and acknowledged in my pres snce, and that the said B. s. Pelzer and Edward Switzer are personally known 10 me.
 Tn witness whereof I have here unto set my hand and affixed my seal of office ar Cananea, Sonora, Mexico this 18th day of January, 1906, and of the Independence of the U. S, 1130
 (SeaD w. J. GALBRAITH,
 Consular Agent of the U. s. A. Territory of Arizona, County of Go
 chise.
 I, Frank Hare, County Recorder iI and for the County and Territory aforesaid, do hereby certify that the within instrument was filed for record at g o'clock A. M., on this day of Jan uary 30th, 1906, and duly recorded ir Book No. 3 of Interpretations Record! of Cochise County, Arizona. at page! 561-565.
 Witness my hand and official sea the day and year above written. FRANK HARE, County Recorder.
Bisbee daily review., 1906-02-25
M BETTING.

Notice is hereby given that mass meetings Of the Democratic electors of the city of Bisbee will be held on the 26th day of February, 1906, at 6 o'clock p. m-. for the purpose of nomi- hating ticket to be voted for at the primary elections as delegates to the Democratic City Convention to be held in said city of Bisbee on March 10, 1906. Double the number of dele gates from each ward shall be nomi- mated at said meetings; the delegates having been apportioned as follows: First Ward ..... =. =. -. =. IS Second Ward ..... ,.. .... . ( Third Ward ..... =. -. ..... IS
 The following places gre hereby des- ignated for the holding of said mass meetings in each ward:
 First Ward-fnternaticuA Undertak- ing Parlors.
 Second ward-Office of Judge Owen E. Murphy.
 Third Ward-PaIacs Undertaking Pariors.
 WALTER c. HUBBARD,
 Chairman Democratic Central Con.
Bisbee daily review., 1906-02-25

In the matter or the
 Estate of ) Notice Edward Grenfell, deceased.)
 Pursuant to an order of the Pro bate Court of Cochise County, Terri tory of Arizona, dated February 18th, 1906, notice is hereby given of the hearing of the petition of l.. c. Shat tuck, administrator of the estate of Edward Grenfell, deceased, praying for an order authorizing him as such administrator to enter into a contract with the Saginaw Development Com pany, granting to said company an extension of the time for final pay ment of the purchase price of the in- terest of said estate in and to the fol lowing described mines and mining claims. situated in the Warren Mining District, Cochiss County, Territory sf Arizona, HOW held by said Saginaw Development Company under a con- tract for the optional sale of said in terest to Watts S. Humprhey, which said option has been assigned by said Humphrey to the said Saginaw Devel- opment Company, the location mo- tices of which are recorded in the of flee of the County Recorder of said Cochise County. in the Books of Rec ords of Mines. as follows, to-wit:
 Worlds Fair. recorded in Book IF at page 600.
 Logan. recorded in Book 1s at page SIS.
 Shattuck, recorded in Book 12 at page 81s.
 Leland Stanford, recorded In Book 12 at page 615.
 Senator. recorded in Book IS at page 2.
 Paymsster, recorded in Book 1s at page g.
 Congress-. recorded in Book Ia at page 3.
 Cherokee. recorded in Book 1s at page 3.
 Calumet, recorded in Book 1s at page 10.
 GrenfeIl, recorded in Book 1s at page 211-
 Heating, recorded fin Book ls at page 235.
 Shattuck No. 2. recorded ia Book 27 at page 478.
 The time of payment and the terms more fully set forth in the form of and conditions of said contract being contract attached to said petition. to which reference is hereby made for the particulars thereof. and Wednes- day, the 18th day of February, 1906. at 10 o'clock e. N., at the court room of said court. has been set as the time and place for the hearing of said pc dtion. and ali persons interested in said astste are hereby notified to appear at that time and place. thcr
Bisbee daily review., 1906-02-25
TAXING BANK STOCK.

To determine whether the capital stock of the National Bank of Arizona is assessable by the city is the object of two suits filed in the district court yesterday. With the filing, Judge Campbell signed a temporary restrain ing order, enjoining City Tax Collec- tor Flynn from levying on the taxes and the city from enforcing them, M. P. Freeman, E. w. Graves, Matte E. Davis, H. B. Penney and Samuel Hughes are the plaintiffs in one suit and Lota H. Jacobs and 6 number of other stockholders are bringing the second suit
 City Collector Flynn assessed the shares at $40 share, and the taxes accordingly. Tn suit brought before City Recorder Treat, the magistrate gave judgment for the city. This suit is an appeal and injunction against the enforcement of the judgment Star =. .- .---
Bisbee daily review., 1906-02-25
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE.
FRANK HARE,
 County Recorder,

In the Probate Court of Cochise County, Territory of Arizona.
 In the matter of the Estate of Clyde T. Scott. deceased:
 Upon reading and filing of the peti- ton of Emil Marks, administrator of the Estate of Clyde T. Scott, deceas- ed, praying that the administrator be authorized, empowered and direct ed to mortgage the real estate belonging to said estate, which is described as follows, to-wit: Three lots situated on Main street in Lowell between the property of the Bisbee Lumber Company and the Bonanza Circle Hotel, together with the uncompIeted two-story brick building thereon situated; said prop erty being in Cochise County. Terri 1 tory of Arizona.
 It is ordered that all persons inter ested in said estate appear before the above entitled court On Monday, the 18th day of March, 1906, at the hours of 10 o'clock a. m., at the court room of said court, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said real estate and the whole thereof, should not be mortgag ed for the purpose of securing the sum of five thousand (s5,000) dol lars, for the purpose of completing the above described building, as is nore fully set forth in said petition, reference to which is herein made for further particulars
 Dated this I6th day Of February. 1906.
 FRANK ". GooDBoDY. Probate Judge
Bisbee daily review., 1906-02-25
NOTICE OF SPECIAL ELECTION
 ON ISSUANCE OF BONDS.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: That in accordance with the Organic Law of the Territory of Arizona, and the Revised Statutes of Arizona pertain ing to elections and pursuant to a res olution of the Common Council of the City of Bisbee passed and adopted at meeting of the said Council held on the l4th day of February, 1906, by which resolution it was decided to call special election, at which cleo tion should be submitted to the uuali- fled electors and owners of real and personal property subject to taxation In said city, the question whether or not said city should issue bonds for the construction of sewerage system in the said City of Bisbee, a special election will be held in the said City of Bisbee on the 20th day of March, 1906, between the hours of 8 o'clock l in the morning and o'clock in the evening of said day, at which election will be submitted to the qualified electors and owners of real or person i al property subject to taxation in the 1 said City of Bisbee. the question whether or not the said City of Bisbee shall issue bonds in the sum of Eighty Thousand Dollars for the construction of sewerage system in the said city. said bonds not bear a rate of inter- est exceeding six per centum Der annum payable semi-annually, and said bonds to run twenty-five years and be payable as follows, to-wit:
 During the first five years of the time which they are to run only the interest shall be due thereon, and at the end of each year thereafter, besides the interest, there shall be due and payable on said bonds the sum of Four Thousand Dollars until rhe said bonds shall have been paid. Notice is further given that said elec- ltion will be held in the following places In the Frst Ward, at the Fire House; in the Second Ward, in the building in the rear of Fire House formerly occupied by J. E. Thompson i; in the Third Ward, in the Johnson lBlock.
 Said special election will be con- ducted in all respects as a regular election in said city, excepting only, that the form of the ballot to be fur nished electors shall be as follows: Shall the bonds for the construction of sererage system be issued? Yes. Shall the bonds for the construction of a sewerage system be issued? No.
 Dated and done at the office of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of Bisbee this 18th, day of Feb ruary, 1906.
 c. W. HICKS.
 .s City Clerk.
Bisbee daily review., 1906-02-25
18th day of February 1906.
 F. J. HART, (Seal) JOSEPH COLLIE, (Seal0
A. R. GLENN.


 Territory of Arizona, County of Co chise, ss.
 Before me. J. w. Ross. a notary public in for Cochise County, Terri tory of Arizona, on this day personal ly appeared F. J. Hart, Joseph Col lie and A. R. Glenn, known to me to be the persons whose names are sub scribed to the foregoing instrument and each acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this 18th day of February 1906 My commission expires March 18th 1908.
 (SEAL.) J. W ROSS.
 Notary Public Territory of Arizona, County of Co chise. ss.
 I, Frank Hare, County Recorder in and for the County and Territory aforesaid, do hereby certify that the within instrument was filed for record at g o'clock a. m. on this 16th day oi February, 1906, and duly recorded iI Book No 8 of Interpretations records of Cochise County, Arizona, at page! 574-576.
 Witness my hand and official sea the day and year first above written FRANK HARE,
 County Recorde Recorders Office, Tombstone, Co chise County, Arizona. Filed and recorded at request of J w. Ross, February 16th, 1906 at a. m. Book No. Interpretations, Page S74-576.
 FRANK HARE, County Recorder
Bisbee daily review., 1906-02-25
NOTICE OF POLLING PLACES,
Special Election on Water Franchise
 March 5, 1906.

The following are hereby designated as polling places. and as election off cers for the special election on Water Franchise. to be held March 5, 1906: First Ward-Fire House. Election Officers: Inspector, J. J. Harrington; judges, Lee Ross and Sam Bowers; clerks, O. P. Hunt and James Bell.
 Second Ward-Offce of Justice of the Peace Murphy in rear of Fire House.
 Election Officers: Inspector, Thos. C. Hogan; judges, William Hughes and Henry Ash; clerks, E. A Wittig and R. A. Nickle
 Third Ward-Paiace Undertaking Parlor. Election Officers: Inspector, J. J. Muirhead; judges, T. R. Grady and l.. G. Jackson: clerks, W. G. Hubbard and c. M. HeLkel.
 c. W. HICKS.
 City Clerk
Bisbee daily review., 1906-02-25

and there to show cause. if any they have, why an order should not be granted to said administrator author izing him to grant such extension of time.
 Dated February 18th, 1896.
 J. E. JAMES,
 Clerk of Probate Court. First Publication February IT, 1906.
Bisbee daily review., 1906-02-25

en from the list O. the Boston Stock Exchange this week. A situation was created which could not properly be adjusted in any other way. It is be- leved that the mistake will be cor rected at an early date. h the meantime the stock can be bought or sold as readily as heretofore through any established and reliable broker.
 GEO. l.. WALKER.
Bisbee daily review., 1906-02-25
ARTICLES eF INCORPORATION.

Know All Men by These Presents:
 That we. B. s. Pelzer and Edward Switzer, citizens of the United States of America, have this day and do hereby voluntarily associate ourselves for the purpose of forming 6 Corpcr- ation under the laws of the Territory of Arizona, and we hereby certify and acknowledge and adopt the following Articles of Incorporation.
 Article 1.
 The name of this Corporation shall be and Is THE PICACHO GOLD MINING COMPANY" and it's princi- pal place of business shall be at the City of Bisbee, the County of Cochise. Territory Of Arizona, and at such other places ss 1t may be convenient or profitable for the transaction of the business as may be from time to time designated by the Board of Directors either within or without the Territory of Arizona
 Article q.
 The general nature of the business and enterprise proposed by this Cor poration to be transacted in the United States of America and the Re public Of Mexico. shall be to acquire. own, enter or ieaso mines and min
Bisbee daily review., 1906-02-25

When q minister begins to run . bank, or banker tries to beat the stock market, they are usually headed for the same danger point
Bisbee daily review., 1906-02-25

The collapse of the insurgent move ment in Congress. merely goes to show that Napoleon was right when he declared that the Lord was on the side of the heaviest Cannon"
Bisbee daily review., 1906-02-25

How appropriate to erect statue to Benjamin Franklin, a real Demo crat, in Paris, How absurd the statue of Frederick the Great, an Imperialist, in Washington!
Bisbee daily review., 1906-02-25

Talk about the call of the wifdi Europe seems to be turing the former life insurance magnates with irresist- ,ble force.
Bisbee daily review., 1906-02-25
PROBATE NOTICE.

In the Probate Court of coehise coun.
 ty, Territory Of Arizona.
Bisbee daily review., 1906-02-25

The existence of said Corporation shall begin immediately after filing these Articles of Incorporation in the cffice of the County Recorder of Co., chise County. Territory of Arizona, and the certified copy thereof in the office of the Territorial Auditor and shall continue for a period of twenty five years thereafter.
The newspaper., 1906-11-02
NEXT TUESDAYS ELECTION.
A Review of the Situation which we Hope the
People will Read and Consider.

forced and he took the course
that his interests demanded
should be taken. He does not
expect to be elected and he will
not be disappointed.
1t IS an indictment of the in
telligence of the state to presume
for moment that the republican
ticket will be elected. The So
ciallSt movement is a side show
and while we believe the majority
OF the socialist party are we'll
meaning men and women, they
ought to know that they cannot
win. A vote for their state ticket
is as emphatic a nose count as
they can get. and it seems to US
as if they might we'll have af-
forded to keep out of the local
field where every vote they get is
an assistant republican vote.
There is a bare possibility that
their support of their candidate
for the Legislature may defeat
Newt Hiestand and place M. d.
Vincent in the Legislature to vote
tor Simon Guggenheim for the
United States senate. That would
be calamity that it would take
SIX years to correct and the risk
appears to us to be too great.
They must settle that with their
own consciences We are aware
that they will say that it is vote
for principle and all that sort OF
stuff, but the fact is that ever
socialist vote in Delta county is
just half vote for the head of
the smeltcr trust.
While we are on the subject of
representative we want to say
that personally we are not un-
friendly to NJ. ID. Vincent. But
we oppose his election for the
following reasons:
The republican platform binds
the members elect to support the
nominee of the republican caucus
tor senator. This ties Vincent, if
elected, to Simon Guggenheim,
1t is known to all men that Simon
has financed the republican cam
paign on an agreement that if the
legislature is republican he shall
have the caucus nomination for
senator. Evans has agreed to it
and will probably keep his word,
Again we oppose Vincent be-
cause there is very apt to be more
contests this winter, similar to
those of two years ago. Gabbert
will doubtless strive to retain his
seat by fair means or foul. He
helped certain republicans to
steal seats last session and will
without question steal one for
himself if possible. There is no
danger of Newt Hiestand helping
the perjured wretch to again Sc
The newspaper., 1906-11-02

AS a rule we say considerably
more regarding politics in the
issues preceding an election than
we have this year. Our failure to
discuss the issues in previous
weeks of this campaign has been
because it seemed almost doubt
ing the intelligence and patriot
ism Of the people to discuss mat
iers upon which the very school
boys are familiar
1t does not occur to us that
there is any special reason for
putting out editorial effort to
diminish republican votes this fall,
particularly on the state ticket.
If the personality of the men and
the influences that placed them
before the people are not suffi-
cicnt to defeat them, then surely
the people should take the re
suit without murmur.
1t is known beyond the ques-
lion OF doubt that the republican
state convention was dominated
and controlled by the corporate
forces of the state. 1t is know n
that the odorous Gabbert was
forced on the ticket by VIM
Evans against the protest OF
every decent republican in the
state There has never been in
The minds OF the republican lead
rrship even a remote hope that
he would be elected. They threw
him over on the start and many
OF their papers have substituted
the name OF one of the democratic
nominees on the ticket at the
head of their columns. II indi-
cations are worth any thing they
mean that Gabbert will not poll
one half of the republican vote
and will not secure any demo,
cratic ones. That will settle the
question OF kingly prerogative for
the next fifty years SO far as
Colorado is concerned.
We may view Buchtel's candi
dacy as joke. He was placed
on the ticket after a self.respect-
ing republican had refused to run
on it. He was not even the
second choice. The state was
ransackcd for a candidate, every
prominent man in the party was
urged to take the despised place,
even King, of Delta, was solicited
TO run with Gabbcrt and turned
the proposal down with scorn.
And we submit that when King
refuses to take a republican dose
II is very nauseous prescription.
Mr.. Buchtel accepted, probably
because he felt that he had to.
Take away the Evans support
from the Denver University and it
would certainly be on short COM
mons. Dr. Buchtel was simply
The newspaper., 1906-11-02

tract. The special contract GER
taInly may be pleaded in defense.
In this case it has been pleaded
in defense and the pleadings ad-
NIT that this contract was entered
into and that so far as the plaint-
ifs in this case are concerned
they performed their duty under
the contract, and if such had
proved to be the case it strikes
me that it would not have made
any difference whether this
suit is based on the common law
liability for negligence or based
on the contract for negligence.
The only matter which at all
disturbs the court is this: In
this contract the pleadrngs agree
that as condition precedent to
their right to recover in any tind
of an action they were required to
give written notice of their claim
for damages prior to the time the
cattle were unloaded or before
they became commingled with
other stock.
This requirement of the con-
tract is pleaded and it is admitted
in the replication that such was
the contract. but it was claimed
that notice was given. The evil
dence discloses the fact that no
notice whatever was given. If
counsel for the plaintiffs had OBJ
jected at the time counsel for the
defendant asked the witness of
the plaintiffs if any written notice
was given at the time the court
would have sustained that OBJ
lection for the reason that that is
a proposition for the defend
ant to prove. 1t should set it up
and prove 1t as a part of its case,
but there was no objection offered
when counsel for the defendant
asked the witness if any written
notice had been given, such as
was required by this contract, and
the witness answered no, that no
written notice had been given
until after the cattle had been un-
loaded and part of them sold and
the others driven away.
The only question is, is that
such a contract as the parties are
at liberty to make and is it bind
ing contract. If so, then it strikes
me that it simplifes this case and
the motion tor non-suit should
be sustained because it is admitted
that the contract was entered into.
1t is proved by TIE plaintiffs wit
nesses that it was not carried out
on the part of the plaintiffs. The
contract itself is not assailed in
any way in the pleadings. Ii is not
claimed that it should be set aside
on the ground of public policy
nor that it is unreasonable. 1t is
not contract that people may
not enter into. The courts should
not attempt to make contracts for
anybody. The courts can only
interpret contracts, and if con.
tract is not entirely void because