The Seattle star. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1899-1947, 1906-06-27

eeftntninE whether the Juror had
discussed the kllline with anyone
sheldon replied that be had 10 dis
eiisaed u. hui only for ihe purpose
ef ascef,aininF Ahat il meant By
the term Holy Roller
And did sou find uut shat IL
vas asked Judge Miller for the
state
Yes"
Ftum whom
ease
Watch oas
ffum Yourself
"pld ! speak 10 you about ne
No. ! only heard you IN your
examination of jurors In this court
room
MheEeupon the assembled al.
aieucv lnaulEed Ia such 4 laugh
that Judge Frazier declared that II
4 wcFs repeated he would order tue
room cleared of al spectators Thls
threat Sas repeated Just prior 20
the nnan recess. when Number %
The spectators rose to leave she
Eaom before court had boen ad
ioufned
oreeoalsas assrss.
Throughout the examination u
Jurors both Sides have b~en espe.
ciailf acfupAianh in asking those
examined shat states They haze
lived in. the purpose being "a avoid
admitting "a the jury auy persons
= hn have recently lived III that
paFtiaH ~ OfeNun who're the IN
fiueneea Of CrvffIeid and hia fol
lowers NcFe felt
Al the time ~ the noon adjourn,
menf there aeFr 40 Indications that
TIE iHT1 would be completed TO-DAY.
and thsFr Is a probability that a.
may be well along towards the ~ad
Of the day tumofroN before the &C.
luai lakinE u evidence In the trial
i begun
Tactics Of Attorneys
A usu aud leading question sas
sprung b Attorney VIII VI Morris
in The examination ~ jurors in tho
Mitchell murder ease yesterday AZ
tefuoou which throws additional
lsght on the nature 81 the defense
= hlrh sil be puf up for the aiassf
q she Holy Keller header
TIP 70 Yesterday the Questions
touehiuK on the practices 81 TIE
dead leader which wrre asked ~
the different iurymen. had refer
snee 20 the treatment By Cfeffieid
Of the married sister ~ Mitchell.
hom the defense viil undertake 10
show Waa Induced hY Crrffleid 50
abandon her husband and children
and live with him in bcsflsi and
lieeuiiou. intimacy
IRE Younger Sister.
The new question sprung yeHten
day touched upon the relations hs+
tween Crcffiaid and the unmarried
sister Of Mitchell vho Was also one
q CFeffield.a victims The aua@
ton vas long and Involved sud IN
u the uuesilouer Was Appafcufis
undertaking 20 outline what the
defense would undertake To proYa
Of that q eumataace Attorney
Morris asked
n testimony should BE- intro
duced 10 the course % this trial
proving. or tending % prove. that
the deceased Cfeffield had SO de-
ceigcd with hiH teachings the IL
Yesrold unmarried sister Of this
defendant. that she fell eompietnfv
under the sway % hts power. II Isl
should he proven that her relatives
had caused her 10 be- sent to q re.
form school for the purpose of set
tlHE her out from under his influ
encc. II Il should be shown that
Cneffield. with the aid Of this girls
sister succeeded in getting the Kirl
away from her place ~ detention
aud had Induced her 20 rua away
with him. that he. the said Cref
field. had betrayed. sedncef and
ruined this Rirl n It should be
shown by the evidence introduced
here that Immediately before the
Killing 81 Cfefneid by this defend
ant the said Crcffieid had prevailed
upon this Rir he had ruined. 20
abandon her home and go away to
his camp in the mountains. and that
the knowledge Of this Last iudianiig
upon his sister had come to this de
PENDANT immediately before the act
Of klllinA CFeffleld. II this evidencs
q permitted BY this court 70 be Ia
troduccd for your consideration.