St. Johnsbury Caledonian. [volume] (St. Johnsbury, Vt.) 1867-1919, 1906-01-03
County Court.


: The December term OF county cour
finished Friday after session consider
ably shorter than the average. Tb
cases on the docket were cleaned up anC
nearly all the state cases disposed Of Sc
that states Attorney Thompson has LEFT
no hing to bother our new states at
tornev.
These state cases were nolle pressed
State Y. Frank Jones, assault and bat.
terry; State v. W. K. Aldricb, gambling;
STATE V. Efgar Demars, gambling; ate
V. A. {. Heath, intoxication; State v.
John Marchiso, disturbing the public
peace; State V. Margaret Pearce, adul-
terry; State v. Royal Ferry and John Den
nison, disturbing the public peace; State
v. Frank Provencia, burglary; Safe v.
Samuel LaPlant, larceny; State v. Amos
Hall, quor; State " Joseph Guyer, lar
ceny; State v. Mrs. J. Negretti, liquor
and State v. William Gumond, conspir.
icy.
10 the case Of State v. Hiram Dennis,
lquor, the respondent plea 1ed not guilty
alter the regular jury was discharged so
new jury had to be called in order to
have his trial. These were called: Charles
Flint, E p, Brown, W. H. H. ROBBIE, w. |
W. Sptague. Eugene Smith, James R,tchlr,
[. F. o Tinker. Charts G. Bradley, Hugh |
Has''ngS Dir. 6 orle F. Chen Fred E.
.tt -
Va < W. 10 tn ju At,i esd " night
"'" - an ~ menf> session the jury
brought n a is gre nIent. The state
IS y G. "ttd b ) ate's Attorney
Thomu' nj b ms By K. W. 5 monds
hnd !. R"tl Scare.
Thee state Cases were continued:
ames SIyce and Emma Slyce, adultery;
state " Harold Woods, rape; State v.
Earnest Kittredge. forgery; State v.
~ous Mooney, burglary; State v. Rich.
ard Hustler, liquor; Fred Smith. burg.
airy; State v. George Spencer, rape;
State Y James Cardella, liq uor; State v. l
Hugh Wallace, perjury; State v. Andrew
ashford, perjury; State v. Frank Emery, Il
ruancy and State v, J. Negretti liquor. q
In the case OF State v. Edward Gillagan O
Or intoxIcation, the respondent has d
een on probation, but recently was s.
ent to Rutland for ntoxicaton. Older II
vas given by the court to have HIM Il
erve 30 days sentence at the expira- ii
ION OF his present sentence Tor breaking
BE rules OF probation. =,
This has been sad term for those !,
eslrlnk to have the marriage knot III. D
ed, tor ont OF Al divorce cases entered :,
the docket only about ten were u,
-anted. Those granted not report ~;
are Wilson Placy v. Eliza Placy, =
iutery; Susie H. BaIlv Parker P. Ball,
toIerable severity; l ez G. Clark v.
lar nee W. Clark, wiul desertion; Iobn
L>naugh Y. Cora Nj. Lynaugh,
1utery; lnez ]. Thomas v. Charles F.
homas, intolerable severity and Owen In
Gray v. Mabel R. Gray, willul "
,sertion. DIR
These divorce cases were continued: be
abel Leonard v. William !. Leonard, dc
Ia =. Brown v. Edward l.. Blown, riN
arret Nd. Barnet v. Harvey c. Barnet, stl
nnie M. Green v. James W. Green, Ella ice
Webb v. William H. Webb, Arthur c. to
'arce v. Margaret |. Pearce, Charlotte in
Joyce v. William H. Joyce, Lizzie be-
'ernathv Y. James Alternately, George ha
WILEY v. Mabel Wiley, Elsie Aunis v. int
osfs A, Annis, John X Wood v. Anna SUI
Wood, Cora Nj. Garter v John tl'
'rter, Mabel E. Taylor v. Charles E. WI
Tayl Tor, Fred L. Page v. Rosa M. ing
INDY Page, Jennie l.. Morse v. Charles hel
Morse, Anna G. Heath v. Wifred F. by
'ath, Mary L. Goodnough v. Frank E. tar
'odnough, Evangeine 6. Davis v. tai
aries K. Davis, Enoch A. Bailey v. asJ
airy ]. Bailey and Pauline Ward v. exl
ron Ward.
n one case where a divorce was r
1ght the parties had been married 48 raj
irs, though they had not lived together do,
the past wears. The court declined n~1
grant the divorce. This beats the Th u
ord in Caledonia county in the length ;n %
the m ,rrI,d lite. Mts'