Evening journal. [volume] (Wilmington, Del.) 1888-1932, 1906-12-13
SPECIAL JURY
CASES GO OVER
Superior Court ReViSeS Trial
List and Fixes Time
For Trials

In Superior Court this morning Chief
Justice Lore and Associates Boyce and
Pennewill again went over the trial
list and fixed the time for hearing spec
cial jury cases. the court announcing
that at the conclusion OF the petit jury
cases next week that that jury would
be discharged until January next
when special jury cases would be
taken up.
This morning was the time set for
the trial Of Professor Hermann,
charged with the practice Of medicine
without the necessary license as re-
Quired by State law. The case was
continued, however, until Tuesday
morning next at 10 o'clock.
Special Jury Gases.
Special jury cases were changed as
follows: Janury 2, Mary c. Ewton vs..
the Mayor and Council of Wilmington.
Jacob Robinson VS. Delaware Granite
and Mining Company; George W. Todd
VS.. Every Evening Printing Company
two actions; John d. Farrell VS.. Har-
Ian and Hollingsworth Corporation.
two cases
January s-Peter, Barnes VS. Brylgon
Steel Castings Company; Sydney l..
lHeidelbaugh VS.. Peoples Railway Com
pany; lydia B. Ford VS.. p, b. and w.
Railroad Company; Maggie J. Connell
VS.. P b. and w. Railroad Company:
William A. McShea VS.. p, y. and W.
I Railroad Company; John Malloy VS..
p, B. and W. Railroad Company; Mary
f. Toy VS.. Wilmington city Railway
Company; William Toy VS. Wilmington
| City Railway Company
January Anthony Zablonsh VS..
Wilmington city Railway Company:
Ellis T.. Banks VS.. Wilmington city
Railway Company; George r. Lilly VS..
I Wilmington City Railway Company:
Anna NJ. Reiss VS.. Wilmington City
Railway Company; w. r. Bowers. ad-
ministratrix. vs. p, b. and w. Railroad
Company.
Reese Won Suit.
Arguments in the appeal case of
David r. Reese d. b. a.. VS.. James r.
Hofecker, involving the alleged fail
ure to pay for wheat contracted for
were concluded this morning and the
case was given to the jury at 11.50
o'clock. At 1915 o'clock a verdict IN
favor Of Mr.. Reese was given. The
amount involved was S54.65, with in
terest form March last.
Seeks to Recover Insurance.
The case Of Mrs. Mary C. Reed VS.
the Continental Insurance Company o.
New York was taken up. John Biggi
land Armon -. Chaytor represented tn,
plintn and Thomas Davis the de.
fendant. In outlining the case Mr.
lBiggs stated that on Thanksgiving
evening, November %. 1908, when hi.
client lived on a farm in st. George.
hundred, her house caught fire from 6
defective fiue and burned to the ground
with all its contents. Mrs. Reed holt
a policy for $1,000 with the New Yorl
company, and upon making a careful
estimate of her losses found that they
footed up S155S, which was somethinl
over S240 less than the original cost o
the furniture. An adjustor Of tn,
company called upon Mrs. Reed short.
ly after the fire an dtalSed over IN,
situation. saying that he would com,
back in week or two and settle. Shl
never had seen the agent again unit
she saw him I'm court and never receiv,
b ed a cent of insurance money Mrs
Reeds present claim against the com.
pany Is for that amount plus interes
: from February g. 1904
! At the session yesterday afternoon
jury in the case Of Frank weldin agains
the Peoples Railway Company. in who
the plaintiff sued to recover for damage
to and loss of services Of his cart. re
turned a verdict in favor Of the company
Robert IT. Richards represented the con-
pany and Samuel II Baynard. Jr. repre-
sented Weldin.