Tombstone epitaph., 1906-07-15
Doings in the
 District Court
IHUR DAY, JULY l2

naNlD peen caltc To Btshee 70 ln- -pect the Gul h or American mining | claim luc tied [ ear the Junction prop | erty that is in dispute between Helms and Hankins, which case was tried | the first part of this week. In ordel | to determine the amount of work done | on the claim, the court deemed it advisable to examine the property in question. Both parties will be re presented when tEe inspection is made today.
 The motion for change of venue in the fee cases of the coustables will he argued in the morning. A change is asked to P.ma county on the g.ounn hat the court is biased and prejudic I'd and that they cannot receive fair and impartial trial of the cases
 The argument on the demurrer in ,he case of the Canada de Cobre Mg Co vs Hughes ct al occupied the at tCHlOu O' lhe SOuIt uutIi o SioSh idNN evening. The case is set for trial on August '.
 A decision is expected to be handed down on Friday in the case of Bassiord vs Elliott which was tried in court on Tuesday.
 The writ of habeas corpus in the Dubois case will come up ia the morning g. 10 o'clock. Attorney 2itchey oi Tucson vii! appear for tn city and Judge Rouse for the prisoner The city officials tried to get the at toIney for Du Bois to consent to the marshal and prisoner to he coLstruc- lively present bnt there was an ohjec- ton and it will be necessary for the marshal to ans~e the writ by bring ing the prisoner. The outcome of the Case is being watched with interest throug bout the territory.
 The case of E A Gotterba vs George Henninger ct al to quiet title, was dismissed by consent "f both parties. stipulation being fled between them that dispo>ed of the matter that was to come before the court.
 l The account of Marshal Daniels for the past quarter, and for the ti.ca! year ending June 30. was audited i' the United States court and approved An order was also entered in the same court approving the accounts of a n num. Der Of bailitfs in the U. 5. court.
 In the argument on the demurrer in the case of Matko vs Daley, to the amended cross complaint, the cOrrt l sustained the demurrer and the dt- iendant was allowed ten days in which to amend the pleadings. This case mas been before the court for several terms. In the first trial judgment was given to the plaintiff. A motion for d new trial was gr ,nted and resulted Tn | jnd yment being given in favor of the defendant, when the case was retried The case was appealed and the supreme court reversed the decision of the lower court aad ordered another new trial.
 B. F. Massey of Coughs, who Was adjudged bankrupt last last June, one year ago, was, by order of the court discharged and the case was closed.
 NEW CASES FILED
 H. M. Gee has brought an action in the district court against Norman 5 Barr and others 70 recaver title to the O'd Guard mine, in Tombstone min ing district The case comes from a ruling Of the probate court in holding that the same was community prop erty and listed az the estate of Mrs. Mary Gee, as she and Mir. Gee held notes made out in their names by the old ',uard company, who had agreed to purchase the same and had made some payments or the property. Nor man Barr, and his sitter. Katherine Barr are heirs to the estate.
 sheriff Hunt i. again made defend ant in an action brought by the Key stone Driller company against him and J. A. Lewsndowski of Douglas for recovery of property. The sheriff Is brought into the case on account of his having executed a writ of attach ment issued ut of the district court in the case of Lewandowski vs H W. Corsi. The sheriff, however, provided against any exigency that might arise and stands behind an indemhiiying bond that relieves him of any liability in the sl ,494 claimed.