Woodruff County news. [volume] (McCrory, Ark.) 1901-1910, 1906-03-15

husband and of her reputation for
chastity.
That she permitted Robert l..
Rogers to visit her in the latter
part of December, 1892, at her
home, in the absence of plaintiff,
and there shamefully embraced
and kissed her, and that at said
place and time they did mate off
together into another part of the
house out of sight, and what other
shameful, disgraceful acts and
scenes were enacted by them the
plaintiff is unable to say.
That in absence of plaintiff from
his home she did permit said Rog-
ers to pay her frequent visits and
that said meetings and visits were
sought by them. That their con
duct toward each other was very
lmmodest and wanton and of such
nature as to cause her friends
and neighbOrst to speak damagingly
OF her reputation for chastity and
to bring dishonor on the plaintiff S
name.
That at the time Of the separa-
ton of plaintiff and defendant, in
December, 1898, she declared that
she did not love plaintiff but that
she did love said Rogers, and in
timated that said Rogers wife was
not the kind of woman he need
ed, bnt that she could fill the bill,
and at the same time and place
when asked about what she saw
about Rogers to get stuck on him,
she cast her eyes up and down the
party who had asked her and asked
in reply, "What is there about any
man to get stuck on ~
That said Robert L. Rogers. in
December, 1893. when he thought
plaintiff had learned of the viola
ton Of plaintiffs marital rights,
and Of the dishonor he had broue ut
on plaintiff, left his home and
family between the setting and ris-
ing Of the sun, and the defendant
knew of the flight Of said Rogers
and of the scandal0us talk about
herself in connection with said
Rogers, and yet she afterwards bv
Encouragement, rs before alleged
met him in the city of Dallas,
Texas, in January and February in
1898, and was alone with him in a
room for four or five hours, and
that such conduct was not that of
a modest woman anxious to pre-
serve her honor and good name.
That the defendant, by reason of
her misconduct as above alleged,
ruined her reputation for chastity
in the county Of Lubbock and com
mnnity where she separated from
plaintiff and had lived for two
years.
That her reputation for virtue
and chastity III said community is
now bad, and that she is not fit
person to raise and educate the lit
tie girl children of plaintiff and
defendant.
That it would be of great and IL
reparable damage, harm and injury
to said children to leave them I'M
der the training and influence of
the defendant during their min
GRITTY.
That plaintiff has ever since his
marriage to defendant been faith
full, kind and affectionate husband
to her and kind and loving father
to their children, and that the
plaintiff has at all times provided
well for the maintenance and hap
piness of his family.
That plaintiff is we'll qualified
and prepared to raise and educate
his said children and that he has
great love and affection for them
and solely their interest at heart.
Wherefore, the premises consider
ed, plaintiff prays that defendant
be required to answer this petition,
that he be granted divorce from
said defendant in a judgment of
| coDaratiOn from tho bonds of mat