The Colfax gazette. [volume] (Colfax, Wash.) 1893-1932, 1906-08-31

block 4, Pullman, from $1475 to $3.50
was considered and the assessment fixed
at $500 The board refused to grant
reduction on lots ], 2, 3, and >,
block 80, Pullman. and lots and 2.
block 40, Pullman, by the same appli-
cant.
The application Of ID. M. Sanders for
reduction of assessment on improve
ments on lot |, block 3S, Pullman, from
$1,000 to $1,000 was considered and the
assessment fixed at $1,000.
The application Of w. II. Harvey for
Hannah Schlatter on lot 8, block A.,
Pullman, from 5000 to $500 was con
sldered and the assessment fixed at $500.
The application of Ii. \. Benton by
w. Ii. Harvey, his attorney, for the re-
ductiOn OF assessment of east half of lots
| 10 and | i, east half of lot 13 and all Of
lot II, all in block As, Pullman, from
| $3.50 to $500 was considered and tie
assessment fixed at $515.
The application of Walter Davis for
reduction OF assessment on improve
ments on lots |, ,. 3 and 4 block I
| Campus Park addition to Pullman, from
| $2lOO to $1,000 was considered and his
| assessment fixed at $500 He also
asked for reduction of $500 in personal
| property as an exemption, which was
| granted.
| The application of NJ. Il. Strong for
| the reduction Of his assessment on lot &.
| block ,, Campus Park addition to Pull
man, from $l79O to 1920, was consid-
cred and his assessment fixed at $3.50.
The assessment Of Matte l.. Anderson
was reduced on lots |, ,, 3 and 4, block
| ., Campus Park addition to Pullman.
| from $274O to $2240
The application Of Elizabeth Mackav
for the reduction OF assessment on lot
IL, block 8, Campus Park addition tn
Pullman, from $2l60 TO $l360, was con
sidered and the assessment fixed at
$500.
The application of r. c. Sargent for
the reduction OF his assessment on lots
3, 4, >, =, block Z, and improvements on
One-half OF lots 10 and 20, block 10,
from 500 to $4OO, was considered and
the assessment fixed at $500.
The application OF Inez Ferbrache for
the reduction Of assessment on improve
ments on lots in Pullman, from $500 to
$780, was granted.
The application of Mary +. Beach for
the reduction OF assessment on tract in
lot 16, Sec, 1-16 45, from $4040 to
S3050, Was considered and value fixed
at $3790.
The application Of f. III. Ietterman
for the reduction of his assessment in the
sw ar OF See. 5-l445, from $2930 to
Sl490 was considered and the assess
ment fixed at $2450.
The assessment Of Valentine Meyer on
lots | and ,, and the hf of the ne Or
and the hi Of the ae ar Of Sec Alag,
from $344O to $29lS, was considered
and the value fixed at $4,000.
The application Of j. j. Schlee for the
reduction Of Assessment on the hf sw
Or See u, hf ne ar II. eh se ar FL, SO
or sc Or 2l, nv or %, swq %, hf ne or
27, NV or 27. hf sW or q. Inf Sc or
27, hf ne or %, sc or ne or b. and the
q hf NV or of 34, sw or of the NV or OF
"a, all in Township II, Range 45, from
So, 500 to $l3, $50, and the assessment
was fixed at $l4, no.
The application of August Rach for
a reduction Of assessment on account Of
an error in acreage was considered and
his assessment on the &c or Of Sec 20
13 46 was reduced from $500 to $3350.
The application of Ii. $. Hollingeworth
for the reduction OF his assessment on
account OF error in the amount OF acres
assessed was considered and his assess
ment was reduced on the ne or of 33-17-
43 from $15G5 to $11S5, and on the HI
or OF 33 17-43 from $2535 to $2295.
The application of A. w. Wood for the
reduction OF assessment on the NV or
ne or of Sec ! 3 46, and on the hf OF
the sc or and the Sc or of the sw or OF
31-14-46, from $2765 to $194O, was
considered and the value fixed at $232O.
The application of Christian Jenson
for the reduction in his assessment on
part OF the Sc or OF Sec. & l7,4G, from
$31O5 to $3.50, was granted on account
Of error in acreage.
The application of X. u. Elder for re-
ductiOn in assessment on tracts OF land
in Sections ) and 4, Township II, Range
45, from $3125 to $2562, was considered
and his assessment fixed at $2915.
The application of w. H. Hawley for
the reduction OF his assessment on the
sw or of the ne or of Sec 5, and the sh
OF the NV or Of - 4G, from $3.50 to
$1,000, was considered and his assess-
ment fixed at $1,000.
The application OF Charles Moser for
the reduction Of his assessment on the ell
sc or 81, and sw Or sw or 81, eh sw or
81, and the NV Or sw or 81, the NV or
Sc or 30, Township IA, Range 46, and
the ne or ne or OF G-13-46, from $5485
to $4,000, was considered and the assesa
ment fixed at $4,000.
The application Of Jacob Schweiter for
the reduction in his assessment on the
ne or %, NV or 20, sw or %, Sc or %,
from $45S0 70 $261O, was considered
and his assessment reduced to $2GIO.
The application of K. II. Lacey for the
reduction OF assessment on improve
ments in lot /, block 10, Colfax, from
$4,000 to $4,000, was considered and his
assessment fixed at $4,000.
The application OF William Codd for
the reduction Of his assessment on tract
in Colfax from 5000 to $500 was
granted.
The application OF l.. w. Follis for the
reduction of his assessment on stall
lion from $4,000 to $1,000 was granted.
The application OF John L. Metzker
for an exemption Of $500, which the as
SCISSOR had failed TO give, was granted.
The application Of w. Z. Thomson
for the cancellation OF his assessment on
grain Of s2400 was granted, and he was
allowed a reduction on his assessment of
$2250 to 1925.
The application of j. w. l.. Robinson
for the reduction Of his assessment on
stock of merchandise from 1896 to
$2100 was considered and his assessment
fixed at $3100.
The application of the reeidents of