Bisbee daily review., 1906-11-22
JUDICIAL GRIND IS HEAVY AT
 TOMBSTONE
Vicente Mendez Charged With Robbery Committed at Lo- well, Found Not Guilty Other Cases.

Vicente Mea leg. charged with the rob bery of the lowell Commercial store, at Lo~eil during the rionth Of May last He vas jointly indicted with Fel.rinio 6ssrtlneE. wto was acquitted yesterday. The jury in this case also Brought n s verdict or not guilty. making the fourth aceuitd since the trial of the criminal cases began. and so far not 9 conviction has been had.
 The next case caiied was that of the territory vs (. R fAmon. charged w'.th burglary alleged to nave been committed tp Douglas Owing to the absence ef material witness for the prosecution the district attorney moved for 8 cantinuance of the case until the nekt term of the district court ia April This motion wa. re- sisted by the sttnraey Cor the defend ant unless the defendant was released on his own secognizaace. which was finally sgreed upon The defendant gave his gr raise to be on hand when t,le case was called on the 2=& Of 9sr Stsnfori. ,efDsed to be respon- s'bIe fos iiis appearance at that time.
 h tae case of Lcpzici ys. Lopozich, aa order wsS made entering William
 KliEe ss 2. party to the suit. and or G-rins hitsl t1 be served with q copy os the su:tiiaons ana complaint
 The next case called was that of the territory ys, C. E. Buster. charged wi.h perjU=y Considerable trouble trouble was had in securing P jury. as rupber of the veuire had formed opinions fu regard to the case Those os Cse sen;ra who were excused on this .und were Chas. wiles. Jas Dough- erty Harry Jennings Jas D Blair. J. E. Henny r. K. Springer. Arthur LutIey $. F. Johnson. ! M Johnson. L. C. WHaur Geo. Jackson The fol- loHins jucors were fnally accepted toI try the sase: Jehn F Norton. l. A. Moore. ]. Q. Wallace. Jas McHugh. F E. WiIes. Frank Briggs. Emil Marks. ". r. Walsh. T NJ English. Parry Gibson and John Jones
 The prosecution opened it's case by presenting the testimony given by Easter at the time Of the trial of the Campbell case on the .sth of May, aud shen followed it up by the testi- mory Of several witnesses. who testi- fed that Buster was at work at the Junction shaft or the morning of the zStir af Apri;. when tle had sworn to have been sn eyewitness at the shoot ing at the depot between Campbell and Mclaughlin. The prosecution then rested it's case and the defense did not introduce any testimony what eyer The case was given to the jury about 9 o'clock The following is a copy of the charging part of the in 6ictuent for whicls Buster is being tried:
 Territory of Arizona against c. F. Buster. in the district court Of the second juaiciai district Of the Territory CT Arizona is and for the county of c F. Buster k accused by the grand jury of the county of Cocs,ise by this indictment. of the crime of perjury committed as follows. The said C. r Buster. on the z5th Gay of May. A. D. i9eS. before the second judicial dis trict. in and for the county of cochise. sn issue within the jurisdiction of said court. duiy joined. and trial thereof bending before the Hon. F M. Doan. one Of the justices of the supreme Court O. the Territory os Arizona. and .udge or fi,e said above entitled dis t~ict court. between the territory and one j. c. csmpbeii. as defendant. the said J. C. Campbell being therein charged with the crime of murder. eaEse oa to be tried in due form of isu bef.trs the said district courtzand :, ia@fut jury. duly impaneiled and gaorn. upon which sei.i trial the said =. E. Euster then and tfiere appeared ass ,sitis.ss for and on behalf of the said J. c, Campbell. defendant, and Aas then and taere sworn and took ,ipon himself an oath that he would n said action tel. declare. depose and certify truly beforr said court. and hat the testimony he would give in ,sid action would be the truth. the &iiole truth and nothing bu the truth.
 which said cath was duly and law suly administered by Geo. E. Wilcox, ctefk pit tne coLft. then ana iHtFc' yhorized and empowered by iaw to Administer th- said oath to the said
 ... 3. Eus;er in that behalf. and that.
 and upon the. trsa. Of the same. 1t then and there became ard was a material matter and question whether the said C. E. Buster was actually present and eyewitness Of a certain shooting and killing which occurred iu the city of Bisbee. within one hun dred and hfty feet west of the depot building. between the hours of g a. n. and f2 m on the s5th day of April. i9as. That thereupon the said C. F.
 E,1ss:cr. being so sworn ss afer esai6.
 iit unlawfuiiy, wiifuily and contrary 5a his srid oath. did declare, testify. 5epose and swear as true lamong other things) that he. the said C. E. Buster. on the said 18th day of April, A. D. 1906. at or about the hour of 10 o'clock of the morning of said day was actually present at and was an