The Rich Hill tribune. (Rich Hill, Mo.) 1903-1911, 1906-11-29
order of Publication.
O. In.srIoa 10. =, -

Afhs4 AHeela0u wv 49, AE'bst
STATE or MISSOURI,
County of Bates.
In the Circuit Court,
ia vacation November 20, 1906.
v. w. Houghtou, Plaintiff,
VS..
Charles sullivan, Defendant.
Now at this day comes the
plaintiff herein, by his Attorneys,
Templeton & Hales, and files his pc
titior and affidavit, alleging. among
other things that defendant. Charles
Sullivan Is a non resident OF the
State of Missouri:
Whereupon, It Is ordered by the
clerk in vacation, that said defend
ant be notified by publication that
plHintif has commenced "a suit
against him in this court, the object
and general nature Of which is 20
obtain a decree and order OF this
court directing and compelling de-
PENDANT to execute u new aud re-
formed deed which shall properly
describe the premises hereinafter de.
scrlbed, upon the ground that the
defendant in executing his deed to
the plaintiff for a valuable consider
alton paid To defendant, conveying
"a certain tract Of land lying, being
and situate In Bates county. Mis-
souri,, more particularly described HE
follows, to-wit: All OF lots three (8l,
four (4). i've 90 and six t6l, IN block
one hundred and nfty-three u5Sl, In
the Rich llill Town COmpHny's sec
ond addition 70 the town NOW city,
Of Rich Hill Missouri Is an CHROME
Gus description and does not In fact
and Ia truth describe the premises
purchased by the plaintiff and In
tended 20 be conveyed boy the de-
PENDANT; that said description de-
scribed the tract Of land ~ all oi
lots No three 49,, four ~, five (5).
and six 90. IN block 1913, while the
same should have been described IA
All Of lots three go, four "a i've co..
and Xix (6l, Ia block one hundred
htty-three (l53l, Ia the Rich Hill
Town Company's second addition
20 the town tnow city, Of Rich Hill,
Missouri, aud that 10 order 90 make
said deed pass 10 plniutih the prem
ises described aud Intended 20 ia
purchased aud conveyed said de-
scTiptiOn should be amended and the
whole description should read as
follows, tO-wit: All of lots No three
90, four l4), hye 90 AID six t6l. Ia
block one hundred aud nfty-three
1851 ia the Rich Hlll Town COmpH-
ny's second addition 20 the town
(now city, OF Rich tin, NO
That said mistakes were made by
the s%criyner and did not express
the mutual intent Of the parties, but
was delivered and received under a
mutual mistake OF fact as 10 said
description, and that unless the said
Charles sullivan be and appear at
this court, at the next term thereof.
% be begun and holden at the Court
House In the city OF Butler, IN said
county. on the frat Monday in Feb,
ruary, 1907, and on or before the
first day Of said term, answer OF
plead 20 the petition la said cause,
the same will be taken ~ confessed,
aud Judgment will be rendered ac-
cOrdlngly.
And II IL further ordered, that
copy Hcftol nc HunAteutAf
20 law, in the Rich HILL TRIBUNE, d
newspaper published In said county
of Bates for fOur weeks successfully
published at least once "a week, the
last insertion 10 be at least thirty
days before the first day OF said next
February term Otthis court.
CHAs. NJ. BARLEY,
Circuit Clerk.
A true copy from the record.
- Witness my hand, and sea
sEAL Of the Circuit Court OF Bates
49, County, this 18th d,y OF No
III. Yembef, 1906.
guaa Al p~kuuFrN