Omaha daily bee. (Omaha [Neb.]) 187?-1922, 1906-11-15
COUNTESS WINS CASE
ASA gsald Csus.aus i, Given Diy'cs
'fau Tlt'd Hu,tsad
pIsuC HEARING 10 UNNECESSARY
.r..' F.sai fHHsisat Jtass ih che touatt
Con Letters
UlsAsD foR An ALLOWANCE REJECTED
lJ FtrJIH Uyorss Case To'lsiu All
R.gau Utds' osbtu.t
Dtust gAY 5tt gHtUstN OSCt A 1tAs
uHfbsf taHHst raks fhsm uoi 90
Traprs wttHast tii- rsFwissi"",
tst 'aHft wiii iHtsF'sus
~ Hs - ,fbg,tsg,
...r r.sdi suasisat Jtuss Ih che souati
Con Letters
.5 Ftuyia Diysrss Case fo'lsiu All
R.gaa Utds' Csttft.t
osJsr w 5tt CmJO'tS osct kYtm

$4,000. .. .. #n. HuHp ~ .s.
t.s ". .#. H.Hsr u.. na.'.
Hf ..E. ..F.. T..r HI. ..r 'H ...
sI NJ, ,..t. ~ w. r. ms .u.
|. H ~ .aHs.sr wH
.I.H.f A. ~, nu. r..r
..r. '.H.'
H. .....I.#. y.
..Ia 2 =, .. .
....| ....U.H =. u..
g .. H.e Hvsrfs ~ t..
#aHHH .f aIf.sa.Fs rrd. H. - ...
TH.. 1F wv ...t .. '
..FHr
I. .uI .ss-uuI-I jude,
Fa f.H.i.H Fa#. I.. I..a0n. nui.N H
aTsti.a .Ir...E ..I '.. countess I0
HfHs ... r.UfI.H t1I divorce mo court
... .uHHf.aa fIs .uatuGt u' U.f chill
sr. fHa .#Hf Ifirr allowed unir The
.H.tI UsHfa tu Pod. H.w HH1 ar4r- .0 'o
".ffai af tHsif .d5.sUY1 which ote nYt
..Hfsafff THs count .a el.ru .Hr rIgh. i1
t.a .HHfsH .f stated p"ri0ds q. tH'
.a af tFail af4ruH.uth.r aH1 krnu tufw
.ftH HHHuaiit dIliUa Ir. holiday
|H. HHu"fs d.uand fuf sH .BIim7nfsry
..HsaHTs .f taru #rruBiI. was proc
..sf fri tf fHs court ia ra without frIudt.
IH law 8a1 woe rejected
uatt raIHf fsF CsnH'.
nfF point fs.Idrd lr tua count s
.. aaa tts Imposition o. me Inhibition
.. HHa .##rfHza fY tHts thp .HHdi.u uui
.. rraHHr uitHruf their fathers consent
..a .HHFf appointed tHa PRECEDENT of
... rHFHHaH of NufHrira fH IiIui11f' Ns
.TtIfH Hf H.r U. aH1GH and wife
|Hs IHIrr1suf uHs Eivsu With costs
#st.frf ffs count Ibr decree. f1" roHd
ne rf uHf,H hardly consumed i've min
U..H. vsa delivered ut tHa ludEs Boo yoic'
.. .4a re- .I ue practically i1audihic 60
ME- .4alI rF1vH Milling tbr court room
varl sHrsr .UHrHfJ 'Hs rbHir- in vair
fa.rta 90 H-aI fHr decision and when Chez
see aWHrs ftHf divorce Wa granted
afsr sssfrsf actually 20 resent fhs loss Of .
rHhft rBt Hf vHI#I r~oplH ir h'Eh 80
t..FH vHIH IHa compelled t0 testify
n~rrsY uuts "Details.
"Fa .HHf 20 tHr deCrfr does not g lh'
.. .iatis af ne aount'ss' hI ~ par
....... .I44srrg.t rs Madam Dc Ctstel
boa. HH.ritfrt iattars and loguueut' se'
...f. u....H usra ffrr~ trs count himself
.a.4Hf. sHiHF auT-isntIr that since thai
..r..I.sa HHH4rf. I- isas iss and iF6. b.
.sr relations ana .rrrrsruudsure with vari
Ire r##f.H .. rTas virtue. which was mos
r.-a.t. fB uIf. thus rendering himscl
e.H. aI n.fa fuatifrirE a divorce. am
- ID h.d tau-d fr .s'1brsh a reconciiis
''-- - petition - M1da~~ de Ca't"llan
r rfaHfFf
me- .aH-fs demand Cor au "aIineutar
n.Hanr.r .r NrH1r H"uuarrr. was d~ui~
- tHr rrr1rI f1ss tha guilty party iu
H.Hs.a fra-a HH ffa 8d.1ufaEes arco~'ie
rsr t.r r. r.srfisx- contract or th~ eour'
.r Hhrf.aI tf- aud consequently the r0ui
.eseI f1 trrr rTf only tha counts 0ris
.sr .it.- f#r EHu'o 7~r auuuu1. but N
fH. e. utH.r |Hs .urHffaT 1Tsrrd ard whic
$50 seems fHr .Ha-. claimed 90 hay
s..HHHHtI U.tItrr
~ .v.-s cleo t1rE a urscsuti-n again
H#r urrras1ntbls attituds % The count Q,
as-d snssf-a rts wife 70 tak. her -hiIdrs
. af tfancs ~ proviai1s that IN "a.
DO refusat Elf.-isf aushortss ti1u cou
rTaatsd
.rr as-r-s -~sisrs ths -9unt--- f4 sar
ranfrsr ~V rrI-aiavs ard Sundays
HT Fra4sf-arfhsr tfe MarrItsr o. Ga
f-.t tE@I- surrender t1 tbsir faith
sea 81 Nsw Years and Fsvt-r 1r
raer+a N tN- swimmer
aaa..s- s.sstd well Fieas-d.
FHGfrIH G..laI Ha fHe former Cuunt-
"asrsulra uEI hereafter bs k1ouu. h
.s#r -eHsHd uHr .rs rran1lE
.fH FaHH.a. .arrsHsa.I .la greatest sau
rlsr H.Hr srs rHealrad the neV~ ar h
ar "ra Nrarus MautzoF Mi
af asuHE eIa e.1 --~fafn he's ur
- rHrH Haa. vas ur8 H-f e. che -hr
fafasIa 1rHf EHs HH H-rs.Hr Intention
r
Hrar ..e #.... Iaa.-d tho conn
r fH H-rf.H r1r-s ID. .Ia H.
..H aHa arHar| HRar vr4Ha-