The French Broad hustler. [volume] (Hendersonville, N.C.) 1896-1912, 1906-03-29
IMMUNITY FOR PACKERS
Judge Humphrey Frees Beet Men
Who Gave Garfield Facts.
CORPORATIONS TO BE TRIED

Court Decides Information Obtained
Was Not Voluntarily Given. But Was
in Response to Governments Demand
Trust Itself vulnerable. :. Sc,
Chicago, ff.-By a decision Of Judge
). Otis Humphrey in the United States
Circuit Court here all the meat pack
erS who were indicted by a Federal
Grand Jury. on charges of conspiracy
in restraint interstate trade are
granted humanity from criminal prose-
cution.
Under the decision the individuals
are to go free, but the indictments
against the corporations of which
some OF the indicted men are members
and others are employees are to stand.
The individuals who go free under
fhe decision are:
T. Ogden Armour. Edward Morris.
Charles W. Armour. Ira n. Morris,
Louis #. Swift. Edward r. Swift,
Charles n. Swift, Edward Cudahy,
Arthur Meeker. tt. Gonnors. P. a.
Valentine. A. n. Veeder. Arthur F.
Evans, /. A. Carton. Robert G. Nc
Afanus and D. E. artweu,
The corporationstha must stand
trial are:
ArnloHr Packing Company. Armour
K Co. Cudahy Packing Company, Fair
hank Canning Company and Swift Il
Co.
Judge Humphrey spoke for nearly an
hour before indicating what the ulti-
innate decision would be.
Reviewing the salient features of the
case. the court went into n consider
alton Of some of the points involved.
In conclusion he summed up his de-
cision as follows: Under the law in
this case the immunity pleas filed by
the defendants will be sustained as to
the individuals and denied to the cor
porations. and the jury will find in ia
vor of the Government so far as h
corporations are concerned and against
the Government SO far as the indiyid-
ualS are concerned"
During the rendition of the decision
the court was crowded by defendants
and spectators. Edward Morris and
Edward Swift were in court, and both
smiled when the decision was an
nOunced. J.. Ogden Armour was not
present. but some men prominent in
-Alp HUlpIUN VI AI1IOuI N w.
were under Indictment were there, and
their joy was manifest. When the
Judge announced that the indictments
would not lie against them, the de-
feHdanfs crowded together and shook
hands.
} District Attorney Morrison raised the
question of the date for the trial OF
the corporations. He asked that the
case be set for trial and that it COM
mence within two weeks.
This met with q storm of protests
from the attorneys of the hackers. who
Insisted that they would be unable TO
preparp the case before fall. After
some discussion Judge Humphrey di-,
rected that the lawyers agree among
themselves on 4 date and notify him
~Of their decision.
It IS expected that the total number
-of witnesses in this trial will be at
F1east 1900. Attorneys for the packers
declared when asking for a postpone
meTf of their trial that their witnesses
would number 1900.
The Government began its activities
directed toward a prosecution Of the
packers and packing corporations in the
summer of 1904. Shortly after the
Commissioner of Corporations had be-
gun work on his investigation at the
instance of Congress.
In November of that year, the Fed
eral officers at Chicago and fifteen
other cities acting simultaneously
served subpoenas upon some 275 wit
nesses. some railroad men. some pack
ing house clerks. some cattle men.
some traffic managers and some Off
~ciais of defunct packing companies and
Drpn9Pa6 for tho nrnSnI&11tinO of n on co
before the Grand Jury rs-rr~
FIGHTING A CRAFTY REBEL.