Willmar tribune. [volume] (Willmar, Minn.) 1895-1931, 1906-01-24

Monday, when it will develop whether
the grand jury will have provided any
work for it to do or not. This is the
briefest term on record as far as civil
cases go, which may in part perhaps
be accounted for by the cases disposed
of before the municipal court of the
City of Willmar. The petit jurors are
the following:
August NJ Moller, Green Lake.
John T.. Bitterness, Arctander.
J. G.. NJ onson, New London.
Amund Larson, Burbank.
Edward Flann, Lake Lillian.
John Hagen, Irving.
Frank Lundgren COlfax.
August Lindquist, Arctander.
Ole l.. Quie, Norway Lake.
John 3. Bo yd, Willmar
Stromme L. Johnson, East Lake Lillian.
II: E. Anderson, East Lake Lillian.
Albert Barber, Harrison.
Erick Ohsberg Willmar.
John P. Elkjer, NJ amre.
Matt Ferguson. Harrison.
Charles Ohsberg, Irving.
VIM Henderson, Green Lake.
Cornelius Larson New London.
\. Q: klope,. Arctander.
H. Shipstead, Willmar.
Ole +. Erickson, Lake Lillian.
Edward Feig, Harrison.
Nils Larson, New London.
The cases upon the calendar were
disposed of as follows:
CIVIL CALENDAR.
William Windhorst VS.. John Eu1ing and
Maggie Euling. John Preema an attorney for
plaintiff; N. l.. Ericsson tor defendant.
Dismissed.
Henry Buurman vs.. Frank Spaeth and
Charles Spaeth. N l.. Ericsson and Geo. H.
Bitterness, attorneys for plaintiff Charles
Johnson for defendants.
Settled.
Deos L. Sawyer, as Trustee, vs.. Albert
and Frank Tolman, attorneys for plaintiff;
J. w. Arctander for defendant.
Settled.
George S. Grimes VS.. Charles E. Fouts and
Andrew H. Rosenquist. George S. Grimes,
attorney for plaintiff; N. L. Ericsson and
DAILY & Barnard for defendants.
Settled.
Justina w. B1ake1y VS.. Kandiyohi and
Stearns counties: Demand for trial by Jury
as to benefits and damages in Judicial Ditch
proceeding.) Samuel Porter, attorney for
plaintiff.
J.J. Carock VS.. Kandiyohi and Stearns
counties. Demand for trial by jury as to
benefits and damages in Judicial Ditch pro-
ceeding.) Samuel Porter, attorney for plain
tiff
William Kruger VS.. kandiyohi and Stearns
counties. Dem and for trial by jury as to
benefits and damages in Judicial Ditch pro-
tff " ' ' p''''''
Susan Roach and Samuel Z. Roach VS..
kandiyohi and Stearns counties, Demand
for trial by jury as to benefits and damages
in Judicial Ditch proceeding) Samuel Por-
ter, attorney for plaintiffs.
]. A. Roach VS.. Kandiyohi and Stearns
counties. Demand for trial by jury as to
benefits and damages in Judicial Ditch pro-
ceeding) Samuel Porter, attorney for plain
tiff.
H. F. Sheldon VS.. Kandiyohi and Stearns
counties. Dem and for trial by jury as to
benefits and damages in Judicial Ditch pro-
ceeding) Samuel Porter, attorney for plain
tiff.
The above ditch cases were ordered
stricken from the calendar. The is
sues involved were tried by jury at
the last June term.
c. F. Wendlandt VS. K andy Obi and stearns
counties. demand for trial by jury as to
benefits and damages in Judicial Ditch pro.
ceeding) Samuel Porter, attorney for plain
Same as above, except that order
was written one, as there may be an
appeal.
l.. F. Anderson VS.. Elling Johnson, Elmer
Johnson, Ben Johnson, Ole Larson and Will
lam Gabrielson. Frank Murray, attorney
tor plaintiff; Godfrey & Giantvalley fo1
Defendants.
Continued.
wv William Ham, F. Wides !5 i Us. Filing n Johnson, 81
William Gabrielson. Frank Murray, attor
ney for plaintiff; Godfrey & Giantvalley 70,
defendants.
Continued.
Peter Skoglund and M ati1da Skoglund vs.
Edward Skoglund. Samuel Porter, attor
ney for plaintiffs; Geo. H. Bitterness for de
fendant.
TO be tried by the Court.
New London Milling Co. VS.. JohnM orrisor
plaintiff; Charles Johnson and E. G. Rublt
for defendant.
A mechanics lien. To be tried by
the court.
Pope Manufacturing M Co. VS.. Samuel o.
mundson and M: Jorgenson. Geo. H. Otter
ness, attorney for plaintiff; George Mule,
for defendant.
Dismissed as to Jorgenson; judg.
ment against Osmundson.
J. Richardson & Co. vs.. Nils Thompson &,
Go. George Muller, attorney for plaintiffs
Jno. M. Downs for defendant.
The only case tried by the petit Jury.
The contention was over the payment
for bill OF shoes. The defense con.
tended that the shoes were to be paid
for only as sold. The only witnesses
were Judge Muller for the plaintiff
and Thompson in his own behalf. The
defense was conducted by r. w. Stan.
ford, the promising young attorney