The Birmingham age-herald. [volume] (Birmingham, Ala.) 1902-1950, 1906-12-19
Local Weather Data.
RECORD OF THE COURTS

kECORD OF The COURTS
The courts have caught the Christmas
spirit for business and are making rec
ords in the disposition of cases. Especi-
ally is this true of the city court, al
though the first division of the criminal
court yesterday wiped quite a number of
cases off the docket
Circuit Court.
In the circuit court yesterday the case
of Louis Cohn VS.. j. A. Traum was
concluded and went to the jury.
The case of the Birmingham Water
Works company VS.. Leo Alderman is on
trial
Circuit Court Docket.
The following docket is set for trial in
the circuit court today:
Ernest Mcdonald VS.. Mike Kruilly APP
peal; Adam Grace VS.. Birmingham Rail-
way, Light and Power company, dam
ages; Wesley Short VS.. Minnie L. Ed
wards ct al, damages; Robert Williams
VS.. Empire Plow company, damages; R.
W. Gayle VS.. j. b. Wadsworth, appeal.
City Court
In the first division of the city court
yesterday the following judgments were
rendered by consent:
Charles Brown, VS.. Birmingham Rail-
way, Light and Power company, $3.50; I.
j. Wilder VS.. Birmingham Railway, Light
and Power company, $125 7. j. Wilder,
pro ami, against same defendant, $1,000;
Mary Walker VS.. Birmingham Railway,
Light and Power company, $3.50; Narcissi
chatham VS.. Birmingham Railway, Light
and Power company, $50. In the case of
j. j. Greer VS.. Adams Drug company the
jury returned verdict for the plaintiff
for $3.50. The case of Charles N Pritch-
ard VS.. Coils johnson resulted in non
suit
First Division Docket.
In the first division of the city court
the following docket is set for trial today:
Clarence Carr VS.. Gentral Construction
company damages; Frank B. snedecor VS..
j. R. Smith, ct al, certorari Rona
Somerville VS.. Birmingham Railway, Light
and Power company, damages James w.
Greer VS.. Cahaba Southern Mining COM
pany, damages; the e. T. Burrows COM
pany VS.. Mrs. M. w. Rogers, assumpsit;
Willie Wilmore vs. Birmingham Railway,
Light and Power company, damages.
Second Division.
In the second division OF the city court
yesterday eight ejectment suits, instituted
by the Woodward Iron company, vera
sldismssed, having been settled out of
court. The case of Ida Satterfield VS..
Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance company
was dismissed for want of prosecution.
In the case of r. A. Burris VS.. Missouri,
Kansas and Texas Railroad company
judgment was rendered for the defendant.
The case of j. H. Foster VS.. George Bur-
ford was dismissed for want of prosecu-
ton.
Second Division Docket.
The following docket is set for trial in
the second division of the city court to-
day:
Galloway Coal company VS.. E. S. Bell
Lumber company, assumpsit; B. H. Dodd
VS.. St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad
company; Emil Nathan & Co. VS.. George
Denny attachment; jeremiah " Wier VS..
II. J. Falls, assumpsit w. l.. Israel, ad-
mnistrator, VS.. Pratt Consolidated Coal
company; damages; Mary S. Ware VS..
vs. Harry RUSSELL attachment; j. ].
Garrett VS.. |. A. A. Crawford appeal;
w. o. Tyler VS.. A. G.. Jones, certiorari;
J. B. Hill VS.. Southern Railway company,
certiorari; Braun & Glazbrook VS.. First
National bank of Birmingham. assumpsit;
Ensley Brown Real Estate company VS..
j. j. Payner, appeal; Jim O'Connor VS..
Lucius Wilson, appeal; state of Alabama,
ex REL, w. e. Hansberger VS.. H. B. Aber-
nathy, mandamus.
Criminal Court.
In the first division of the criminal court
yesterday the following defendants plead
ed guilty: Sam Scott, burglary and
grand larceny; John Smith, larceny from
store; Jim Kelly, grand larceny; Walter
Jones. grand larceny; James l.. Larry
more, accepted one years sentence; Fred
Harrington. convicted by the jury of
grand larceny. In the case of John Henry
Adams, charged with burglary and grand
larceny. the jury was out when court ad-
journed.