The Glenwood post., 1906-03-10
COAST DEFENSES
URGED BY PRESIDENT IN sPE-
ClAL MESSAGE.
MUST PROTECT HARBORS
New Island Possessions Must Be For
titled if We Expect to Hold Them
Draws Lesson From Japanese War.

Washington. - President Roosevelt
| sent a message to Congress Monday
accompanying plans for coast defense
prepared by joint board of army and
navy officers in which he emphasized
| the necessity for further defenses and
reviews the history of the defensive
works in this country.
The President calls attention to the
| recommendations that the entrance to
Chesapeake bay be added to the list of
places in the United States to be de-
Tended. He says the insular posses
sions cannot be longer neglected if the
United States desires to hold them.
Defenses are recommended for Ma
Mia bay, Pearl harbor, Guantanamo,
Guam, San Juan and Honolulu, be
cause of their strategic locations. De
fenses are recommended for entrances
to the Panama canal The message
says:
Our coast defenses, as they existed
in 1860, were not surpassed in eff
cheney by those of any country, but
within few years the introduction of
rified cannon and armor in the navies
of the world against which the smooth
bore guns were practically useless.
no attempt was made to remedy the
deficiencies of these seacoast fortitica-
tions. There was no establishment in
the country equipped for the manufac-
ture of high-power rified guns. There
was no definite adopted policy of coast
defense, and Congress was reluctant to
undertake the work, the cost of which
could not be stated even approx
iplatply and tho lntailS nf u-hipb ba
not advanced-so far as could be as
certained- the experimental
stages.
'DefenSeS are recommended for the
entrances to the Panama canal as con-
templated by the act of June 2S. 1902
(SpOoner acD, and under the terms of
this act the cost of such Notifications
would probably be paid from appropri-
ations for the construction and defense
of the canal.
"The necessity for a complete and
adequate system of coast defense is
greater to-day than twenty years ago,
for the increased wealth of the coun-
try offers more tempting induce
ments to attack and a hostile fleet can
reach our coast in a much shorter per-
ior of time. The fact that we now
have navy does not in any wise di-
minish the Importance of coast de-
fenses; on the contrary, that fact en-
phasizes their value and necessity for
their construction.
1t is an accepted naval maxim that
navy can be used to strategic advant-
age only when acting on the offensive,
and it can be free to cooperate only
after our coast defense is reasonably
secure and so recognized by the coun-
try. 1t was due to the securely de-
Tended condition of the Japanese ports,
that the Japanese fleet was free to,
seek out and watch its proper objec-
tive-the Russian fleet-without fear
of interruption or recall to guard its
home ports against raids by the Nladi-
vostok squadron. This, one of the
most valuable lessons of the late war
in the East, is worthy of serious con-
sideration by our country, with its eX-
tensive coast line, its many important
harbors and its many wealthy manu-
featuring coast cities.
THE security and protection of our
interests require the completion of the
defenses of our coast and the accom-
panying plan merits and should receive
the generous support of the Congress"