The Washington herald., 1906-11-20

/ Wolf & Rosenbers-J0seDh Solomon and ". H.
White.
No. 59i. Rogers vs.. Parker. Attorneys. H. W.
WbsaLsy-Phiip Walker.
No l53 Lord rs. Emery. Attorneys Randolph
Barton and l. c. Dutt1a-J. Z. Ray and ". NJ.
Levin.
! No. O. Jones vs.. Washington Railway and Elec-
trio Company. Attorneys. r. +. Downing and L.
A. Beuy-J J. Darlington.
/ No. "a Beverly vs.. Washington Railway and Flee
/ trc COMPANY same attorneys.
! No p. Watts VS. Washington Railway and Elec-
trc C0mpau~. same ATTORNEYS.
No III Chasmar Winchel Press Us. Wedderburn.
Attorneys. IT. Winship Wheatley-C. A KeiCwin.
No. e. Harlan q H0llingsvorth Company vs. Dis.
tuct Of Columbia. Attorneys McCammon q HAYDEN
Z. H. Thomas and H. 7. Blair.
No. 81. NyrEoop ys New York Continental Jewel
Filtration Company e. al Attorneys, Douglas a
DoUgaS-McGammou Hayden.
Nc 81. Cole vs. District of Columbia. Attorneys.
Z Gittinss & ChamberIin-E. II. Thomas, Douglas &
Douglas. and J. J. Darlington
No. s.. Richardson vs.. Cannon Attorneys
Thompson & Lasksy-Edmund Burke.
No 3D. By1ne vs. Lisner. Attorneys, L. H. David
Leon T0brner.
No IL. National Mechanics Bank rs AIund-
helm Attorueys, Berry * Minor and J. F. Collins
Wolf & Rosenberg
Circuit Court No, 2.
JUSTICE ANDERSON.
Biebar vs. Biebar. order 10 refund deposit Of SO
70 plaintiffs artoruev
Baltimore Building and Loan Association vs.. Jen-
nings; demurrer 70 second substituted repicatious
overruled- Plaintiffs attorneys. George Il. Lamar
and MILAN & Smith. Defendants attorney. John
Ridout
DicEhaut IS. Washington and Potomac Steamboat
Company; demurrer 20 declaration oyerruled Plain
TINS attorney, ". 4. White. Defendants attor
Eeys. Balston E Siddons.
Dudley vs. Owen, demurrer 20 first third 10
sixth pleas Of defendant 70 second count Of declara
ton sustained. Plaintiffs attorneys. Putnam 4
Poe. De.endantis attorney w Il. Robson.
Pelz vs. DAUdigne; motion for judgment over
ruled and defendant ordered to file additional aAi-
davt within thirty days. Plaintiffs attorneys Tucker
d Kenyon. Defendants attorneys, Hamilton, Col
bert & Hamilton.
Lea Us Patterson; demurrer to amended pleas
sustained Plaintiffs attorney. II. Winship Wheat
les. Defendants attUneT j. !. Hemphill.
Waterman IS. Bsumgarten; demurrer to declara-
tion sustained. Plaintiffs attorney. J. W Glcnnan
Defendants attorneys, J. l. Peyser and Wolf x
R0seubcg.
Marswood Us Nenefee; on trial Plaintiffs at
tCrneys Chaplin Brown and J. Paul Earnest. De
fendants attorney George l.. Hoover
Richards vs.. Zurhorst continuance stricken out
Plaintiffs attorney. ". &. Preutiss. Defendants
attorneys, Hamilton, Colbert & Hamilton.
Assignments for to-day:
No. 70 Roche Is Myers. Attorneys, Archer &
smith-Iiamiltou. Colbert & Hamilton.
No. ia Conrad vs. SWitger. Attorneys. ]. c.
Adkins-H T. Gatlev
No l70- Doolan vs. Briehtwood Railway Com
pany. Attorneys, p. J. Ryan,. J. Darlington,
No. a Walsh rs. White. Attorneys. H. L. Davis
-Sheehy d Sheehy and N. J. Colbert.
No. 10. Ambrose vs.. Potomac Electric Power Com
pany. Attorneys, G. II. Merillat-J. J. Darlington
No. s.. Scott vs.. HerreH. Attorneys. Mackan &
Naedel-lrTins Williamson and W. Moshy Williams
No -. Morimura Bros. vs. Hagger ct al; and
No. - Karagensian vs. same Attorneys. Tucker
& kCnyOn-W0f & Rosenberg
Nos 100 and iR. BissoD vs. Masters. ATTORNEYS
L L Gies-W q. Gardiner
TO j. French vs. Capital Traction Company. At
toners, ". J. LambeTt-R. Ross Perry & Sons and
g. Thomas Dunlap.
40. l. Totten Ts. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad