The Salt Lake tribune. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1890-current, 1906-06-16
|I REPLY MADE
|IFE PRESIDENT
l. wadsworth of House
.i,tee Is Not Humbled
4 BY Criticism
NELT CALLS MEAT
I'M WRONG EVERY WAY
L,r Makes Answer That
|.,uds Specific Proof
/ Of Charge.

n ol Inc npuS- - -
,nolght made public the cor
h-fgeen President Roose-
,-ssIf regarding the meat IN
"A creoared hy the committee.
In his letter says that al
Tango In the House amend
- ~ worse, and In his Judg-
F.r,rd as 10 minimize tne
.r,Ins out In the evils In the
'.,,sss In his reply Mr..
dccIancs the President is
vrooe" In his estimate OF the
IN calls attention TO the
: tse bill and concludes with
- cf regret that the Presl-
Il teel Justified In impusnlns
---ry OF a committee OF the
h jos-~sentatlyes. You have no
rsrr" says Mr. Wadsworth In
|.--ondence between the Presl
. M Wadsworth Is as follows;
residents Letter.
. rss~ Washington, June II. 1905.
y, WadSvorih-I have gone over
carefully, and not only obtained
IL A, NeCabs, as / told you /
4 40 obtained a report from Mr.
I'd ara sorry 10 say the more
-,rlsute your proposed substitute
N ~ n Almost every change is
1srr,: 40 that IL hardly seems
. n % 70 enumernte them. Per
E.,lssnt as you have now drafted
. - AZ bad as IL was when you
. ! 10 in tho fret Instance but
~ ka6. There seems 10 be one
- Il Is poSyiblo that the amend
4 scrss than the original amend
|s-szs likely, there In no pro-
rattnx plants accessible at all
. L. -s,<ctora.
. Nat am sory 10 have TO say
. E1s re a. an amendment which.
l. ~ Internationally, Is framed 50
- ns chance OF roofing out the
psrslas business. Doubtless II
I'D lrksl who object TO a thorough
- npeh better than tho Sennte
~ ! ssve no doubt that not
Izsrs, bot their allies In business,
I'd growers who arc influenced
~ prefer IL. But i am con-
b. In The long run. be n heavy
| \ tost siock-raiser and the hon
j , atc2t these provisions rather
y bssier ones contained In the
t-sat. for. as compared with tho
[L.i5L this proposed amendment.
" re 10 that OF the majority
Il rnnIltee, would hamper In the
y hsrcpsr fashion the Secretary
- b doing tho work which you
~ hln 10 DO. and will prevent
4 q ths work az can be donc at
vel and thoroughly done. II
le q through In tho form that
4 y0ur committee proposes. II
! should eign IL MS working q
Improvement over the present
d ! hhonld accompany II by q
t7lFluy stqting how Grovo the
H1 ! eannoi even promise to
~ tie provisions about the
'o 20 about other matters. are
ny opinion. II thoy had been
.'sH>1 10 prevent tho remedying
@nfihned Of they could not
= That the surest wny to keep
~ rom US, and. indeed. our in
eslss In 2 thoroughly unsat-
and to prevent Ito resur-
which " formerly had. Is TO
,he shape proposed in tho
F.h ' you
THEoDoRE ROOSEVELT
Wadswcrth. Chairman COM
Te. House Of Representa-
s'dsv0rth's Reply.
: Anieulturs. House OF Repro-
seslHgton. d. C., Juno IA isoS
=, vvEdent-l receiver your let
- Iea are wrong. very, very
nlmeie OF the committee 5
Il :, .l.ut piece OF legislation
your own views In this
VT prepared by q COMMITTEES
- l.y msmoer OF the COMMITTEES
~ ! - AID sincere &c yourself
-, ,sH the passage OF IA rigid
= 1rguaee- 1"o meaning
- - unreliable the Information
~, e your opinion Of the
- attention TO III. To,InuIn',
<Gf,r IS, ,.'isf. There 10 no provi-
- plants accessible at all
1, ~ Q pase 4 OF the bill (cOpy
~ - ~ ~, VIII hnd tho following
q rlz...i.e e purpose OF such e1am.
4 s1 ,,a sLd inspectora sheil
NE css 10 every part OF naId
tz-.r, me English Language be
kf.s.s' line ls, and you will
usn ne eocaetary OF Agrt-
n,ih oamlnauon and lnspeo-
.kSsI tssp eEine and goats. and
u t.,st1,ut, elau&htered and pro-
"A sc.anenu hSreineofora do
~ "a tpcee Of Interstate or for
a made during the niab,- :
snms Tho daytime, whon ~.
= l-,-- eattle. sheep. Fwtna ang
u rntion os said fe.os nrc,,,1t,a ~ a,a
s The night-time p'0auets
u, saE ono Of tha ,uo Ill,
" sIers se Dill you admit that YOU
= ,us,s us,1.s I, suits the packers.
h.ks.. n.VusnsoinS Inspection. :"
cannot Object.
i 6say N night. when I .ubm,,
Eee.lr,.s t the packcrs Insiste1
ns,,d % having u rigid in
2roItt. heir lifo depends upon
fkat ~ VIII bear me out In
-Ef Va, u'ey placed no ohs,aci"
N1u,s' ~, en- the contrary eayS
"a ksori'ssestions, based npor
1rnl sr,,gs Of their buaInass
-eo.r,' 'nleirm OF the amsndmc1,
ali =, ssiev' clauso Ths 49,, - =
.osr ibis clause Is TN, o. ?.
-nat II 10 aIrcnS, -. "a
! have beer tauS Wv
II nSs n judiciary ~ ~, .Ansnt al
ullsns ara Se 10 respect IN.
ne 1 css,o 70 respect tho right,
ea n-a believe that m,
c!isa ne slon which guAran,
~ ua hntf'nllege OF an nppea
~ are H. Aneu ho believes hi,
s'isd To- sned can be JustlJ
to Meet Charges.
pa eons. deals with geperali
y yua or na'ion OF the com
~ Iusf snasr1tn It actually faii,
LkStlS tsT0tpsS,e; l can asufe So,
- F1uis. ;, N your letter: AN,
lad N. ,'1gn It, because IN,
eeHhera,sl In my opinion. /
S}sef q Ibt dssigned 10 pre-
sats ben n svlls Complained o
rH ~" fresldent 81, a.,
ftt ths s.nsd. snHnrsd. by lnusndo a
,f~ Iss % The Hotisc OF %, T@in pm
w un,s u no warrant for i1sp i,p
~ hso.sy,,;y WADswoRTH.
President of III