Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1906-09-12

rugft ~ IA n a few "haysecus'
q tlln l ,,,ry time" But Ike YOU
owned fen, N these ambitious SAT-
ol,soi' ~ a;rsafer University ana
sif. E,..dyrYT and refuse 90 stay
I0Rt WI hsir unreasonable ana
ipfsc " 3.,snds are satisfied, irres-
ui'islll., ~ .,51encts 10 the rest Of the
ts
Prof PArLs ANSWER
.,,,A4,t, the compliment implied
nv hina Thoresen's praise but
~, ,,-p.ls me to admit that It IS
80. Firstly, because ! can not
!, n, similarity which Mr.. Thore'
IA. between Prot Evans ornate
ma MY own blunt method OF
$3.50, secondly. because ! never
A., Of the professors replies TO
TAnre,sn until they appeared IN
n, thirdly, because ] have never
.r n any such plots" on the part
A, peopl, Of Salt Lake az those 20
!. Ne snudes. and, iourihly, De-
. | cannot claim much OF the honor
a, valiant work" that "downed
b. every time" they tried 80 steal
arlculturh college.
n, f,ct Is that while ] was for three
,ysye legislative periods-that Is,
~ the legislatures that preceded
followed and also during the con-
,rional convention itself--a member
! M cache county committee that ap-
ARA m behalf OF the agricultural
51efs before these legislative bodies,
me arguments offered were not
{,ib mine but those Of the committee
4 whole
ms own arguments, presented 10 the
knnlttee at the legislative session
|,i preceded the constitutional con-
|rllon vas verbatim as follows:
The FIRST ARGUMENT.
\ ne University and The Agricultural
,,lsee should o combined: lsl-Io pre-
I,nt unnecessary duplication OF studies
Ns-Ta rrvent unnecessary duplication
n ,,s,iirr and classes. 7ro-To prevent
krvse,gsry dqplIfsuon OF libraries. 4th--
H. rfsttri unnecessary duplication OF
tissNeps. tools &c. ith-To prevent un-
rcss,yy tsrAsauon Of laboratories. 9Th
) prevent UNNECESSARY duplication Of the
ofk Of superintendent, clerical Work,
usitfy WORK, etc. hh-To make one
II institution ia the place Of two les
h cnts sth-To save say $500 peryear
he territory 81 N. regular Work OF
Igkef education The University will re-
Ire Sosl arngslly % conduct II on It's
~rt basis. ;h college will require As
gfh more Conhned 80 90 will be am
.or both saving 1900 and Interest,".
,-Io place q university education
ND ~ rseh q OF Young men, with
Paving home FOR a. ilth-The leading
g'si5H q Europe snd America Ray d.
o- f'f primary and secondary schools,
tsnesnusuon for university work.
d OPINIONS q great educators. CHaNc
'rtd EQUATIONS from letters written
- 70 lW by American college prosl-
\ 20 olhers IN favor OF consolidation
\ be higher schools.
Il he University and the Agficul.
D. college combined should be located
Logan, for these reasons: lst--The
ftifltss and excellence Of board. End
theapntss o. rent 20 students. ard-
anal tAptnse n living due 10 the
fiaiauye simplicity OF lie and man
y .ia ne absence Of metropolitan
| llauons and even necessities 20 ex-
z money ilt-Tho high moral and so.
ione " the community. sth-The
-.lhiui loeau0n. There are no months
VS. which students are unable 10 work
~. ~ there are IN other cities Of Utah.
z especially IN SAT- Lake City. 6th-The
-iaatoe q pure canyon water. ,th-The
ssiful looail0n IL the college. Sfh-The
capacity. Of the buildings already
W. sllhclent % accommodate the
..it oi both institutions sth-The
'..so.tnsnl ~ Logan as the location o.
10y institution would mean a loss TO
F.ti2fy q the immense expenditures
~ made here. ieth-Economy. the
ltlutnl fOr union, would be ut
2 ~dihctd and heavy expense IN.
~ N addltion 20 those now necessary
M -il.air both Institutions separately"
"a ~ 81 the duplicate studies
~ ~ both the University and the
'''lf"l college was here given.
PLEA WAS ECONOMY.
ie foregoing written al the re.
~ ~. u me committee, was my con-
~. a. esrly a. our territorial DAYS
' .lllly, being the chief argument
... s"oh tsee III, 10 aboye). Nor.
q 70 details has my belief as
~ eesHabllily Of union changed
~ Vice that time
!. q oohmiitet finally decided not 10
|. ,t argument for consolidation,
,,.,, oehhne ilself 10 proving that
|. ny ~ .. more economical 10 main
!. v 4, college a. Logan than 10 COM
\. a., WIN The University al salt
toR UNION ANYWHERE.
~ ss'enent that greater efficiency
49, .sssli from union was not oues.
rr,, W ,he committee. but numerous
M -, ~. we're used 10 show that The
. ,,,o.uio save money BY retaining
NJ - a. Logan, that the college
n ~ me state little or moth.
. A.. ~ NE future, and that Logan is
J, !, pace for q school. These
D ~ aIsnmonts that prevailed
4 ~ - legislators In favor Of let
49, oonege remain at Logan; and
- IN 's' these arguments Appeared
n, 'sl founded. for the Attendance
= \, wllege increased during The
.s' ~ ~ F,ars from $50 10 tss est
,,s ,, ~ laois; while the legislative
B 49,, .''ons 70 the school for those
y 81 amounted 10 only si70n0
n winch was 20 cover a denci,
isA IN, N Ieeedlag biennial period.
4 nAiy turned out 10 be sis.
y ~ oourse Of events since ina,
rs,.sr SHOWN that the sunnosad
:, 80 - " logan a. college town
r,. oo,.s.I'ettiinaied. After IA v1ars
tuns,n. under the most Favorable
'tilnsr, =, The college shows an
a., ,s liseS.e) OF only sss In.
irt,, summer school studen,s-
n NJ. o. only is2 students an "a
"a NJ, Vouhiins the summer course
~ H., ~ ihen given. In the two |
n srrn, .viluNed The presentation
: ssinss ~ given above. me col.
sssr y go students--an Inrrtsse (
war ~ ~. sent o. 10 per cent |