Ottumwa tri-weekly courier. [volume] (Ottumwa, Iowa) 1903-1916, 1906-06-26
TWO SUITS ON NOTES
AQUlLLA JANNEY FILES PETi.
TloNs AGAINST G. CAMPBELL
AND MARY II. JANNEY
The Sum Of $11,42s, Claimed on Prom
issory Notes, is Prayed For BY Pc
acknowledges and jacques Have
cases-Two Damage Suits.

Claiming S11, 428 on promissory notes
given by G. Campbell Janney and Mary
III. Janney, Aquilla Janney has filed
Two suits in the district court of Wa
pello county in an effort to recover
on the paper in his possession. In the
frst petition for judgment against G.
Campbell Janney and Mary H. Janney,
the plaintiff states that on June %,
1905 the defendant made, executed and
delivered to the plaintiff two promis-
sorry notes for $2,400 each, one due in
twelve months from date and one due
in two years after date. He further
states that no part of the principal or
interest on said notes has been paid
and that said notes are due and who'll
ly unpaid and the property of the plain
tiff. The petitioner further states that
there is now due on notes $7,968 for
which sum, with six per cent interest
together with COSTS including reason
able attorneys fees, the plaintiff de-
mands Judgment.
In another and separate petition en-
titled Aquilla Janney VS.. G.. Campbell
Janney, the plaintiff AYERS that on Aug
ust %, 1904, the defendant made, exc
cuted and delivered to plaintiff his
promissory note in the sum of $3.50
and that there Is now due the sum of
$1,49S50, for which sum with per
cent interest, the plaintiff demands
judgment In count two of the same
petition, the plaintiff states that on
or about March 10, 1906, the defend
ant, g. Campbell Janney, made and de-
livered to the City National bank Of
Martinsburg, West Virginia, his prom
issory note for $500, endorsed by the
plaintiff az an accommodation endorser
and which note has been paid by the
plaintiff and is now the property of the
plaintiff. Judgment in the sum Of
$107.60 is prayed for on count two.
Count three sets forth that on or about
December %, 1908, the defendant deliv-
cred his Eromissory note for the sum
of $1,000 to the plaintiff, for which
judgment in the sum Of the amount
now due, $1,s54, is asked. The suit
against G.. Campbell Janney prays for
total Judgment Of $3,460. Jaques and
Jaques are the attorneys for the plain
tiff.
Sues City Of Ottumwa.
Claiming damage to the extent OF
$500, caused by improper grading
| WulCI dlIOWSu q 4udAliCy VI AAe1SS
water to destroy his property, G. w
Mofitt has filed suit for damages
against the city Of Ottumwa. The pc
titioner states that in 1890 North Wal
nut avenue IVES graded, and through
alleged negligence of the city, the
street was left in such a condition that
it allowed the water to flood the prop
erty of the plaintiff. For damages tc
his house and lawn and tree and we'll
he claims $500. Siberell & Burnstedt
are attorneys for the plaintiff.
! Asks for Damages.
The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy
Railroad company and the Chicago
Burlington & Quincy Railway com
pany VS.. James LOCKER, is the title Of
a suit for damages for 5000 and the
removal of defendant from property
owned by the plaintiff companies. II
1 the petition the defendant is alleged t.
have been wrongfully holding sale
property, and the petitioner prays fol
$500 damages and that the defendant
be elected and removed from the
premises. w. D. Eaton and McNett 8
McNett are attorneys for the plaintiff
:. companies.