The Montgomery advertiser., 1906-04-20

fiil6 hdllFOdu 1OiHRnhS and put in a passenger fare of three (3c) cents per mile on all its brancn lines within the state of Alabama, to be effective January ist. lsoS. , al, The above was concurred Tn py ati three Commissioners and was passeu
 Koon & Go, vs. Louisville and Nash vile Railroad Company.-Depot- aecoin- modations at Vinemont, Ala. On mo tion of Associate Commissioner Sanders the Commission made an order reauiI ing the erection of room suitable TOT the storage of freight (same being what petitioners asked should be. done1 at said station, plans to be submitted 10 the Commission at it's next meeting. Above motion was passed, all three Commissioners voting aye, vs Standard Chemical oil Company vs; Central of Georgia and Louisville and Nashville Railroads-Track connec- tions at Andalusia, Ala, and transfer charges. Above submitted on written briefs.
 J. M. Lacey. ct als. vs. Southern Rail way Co,--Depot accommodations at Ky land, Ala. Commission ordered that 8 freight room be erected, all three Com missioners voting aye. :.
 J. &. Lindsey X Co. vs. Southern Rail- way Co.--Rate on cotton from Leighton to Huntsville, Ala. Continued.
 A. g. Gam, ct als., vs. Frisco system Beaverton, Ala. Petition denied. Com mission had no jurisdiction,
 w. L. Haskew vs. Southern Railway -N Stittoh. Aoi o6Nf~s WY ~r~~~N-' Seaboard Air Line Railway Company. Petition for approval of conductors cash fare Petition approved, permit ting a charge to be assessed by con- ductor of one cent in excess of approved passenger fare, where passenger fails to purchase a ticket. at regular agency. The Commission then direct cd the Clerk to cite the several rail- roads doing business within the State of Alabama to appear on the first Mon day in December, 1905. before the Com mission, for the purpose of examining and revising the rates on cotton in bales from local stations fin Alabama to cot ton mills within said State, all of which was accordingly done
 Power Company.-Submission ot Freight and Passenger Tariffs for the Approval of the Railroad Commission af
 Associate Commissioner Sanders stat ed that In pursuance to the suggest ion made by the President of the Com mission at Its last session that this fixing rates to be charged by the Bir- mingham Railway. Light and Power Company, he had made some investt- Charter of this company authorized 1t to "engage In the carriage Of persons aud property as a common carrier, ana to charge rates of freights and tolls Tor Tor the same oVer the mes 0i ''S ran Associate Commissioner Sanders also stated that he was informed that this company was doing q freight business hhsipess ~ and in order that tho whole subject might be investigated, he moved that the Birmingham Rail- ed to appear at the next session of the Commission to show cause why It should not submit to this Commission for It's approyel the freight end passen- was carried. all three Commissioners n.s y..inS aSe; ,Sea.
 The Commission met in regular ses- Tunstall and W. T. Sanders. Follow ing proceedings were had and done:
 Railroad Commission vs, Alabama from saioH focal points in AIabaraa to eit- ton mills within said State. Continued until January 8, 1906.
 H. C. Fuller. ct als.. ys. southern Junction, Ala. Continued until Jan. s. ''SD' A. L. Davis. ct als., ys. southern Rail, way company.-Pettsicn fcr ,, white snd sI. Clerk directed to make an order to re- ouire the Southern Railway to furnish separate waiting rooms for white and cOlSred pasSe9sSeas sSamieal es rriDfs Company pany and L. and N. R. R. t,ompany.- Track connections at Andaiusia, Ala, Complainant con could file bricf on Jan commission having before 1t an ap plication from the Nashville, Chatta- nooga and St Louis Railwsy to reduce inc rate on coal from GadscSn to Boaz, Ala. and Guntersville. Ala. from l.l0 and S1.20 and $l.30 per ton of 2,OOO pounds to an uniform rate or Sl.9o per of nnnndq alflf0Vad such
 M A. Springfield. ct al,:, vs. Frisco System of Railways.--PeyStion 10 re. uuIre the west bound fast train No Zob fo make regular stops at Guin, Ala. on motion of Associate Commissioner sand CTS, who stated that the statute or Ala bama excepted this character of tram; which carried interstate passengers ana interstate mail, from that provision or inc law which required passenger trains to stop at such stations, tHe e- pe- noting no. and Associate Commissioners Tunstall and Sanders voting aye
 Jan. s, 1OO.
 The Commission met in regular ses- sion: B. B. Conner; President ana aociate Mi Commissioners. The following proceed ings were had and done:
 Railroad Commission of AlsoamA vs' Alabama Railroads-Rates on e6s,on spswn to cotton mills within said state; Lne sbove cause was formally heard; wit, nesses examined and their testimony reduced to writing. The cause con tinued unti the testimony couid pc gone over by the Commission anu Lur- ther considered. ,. eortharr
 IT. C. Fulton. ct als.' Vs, coS,,',nndan Railway Company-Depot aceH,ii'ipSn pn.- tions at Gurnee Junction H'S' N0" tinued until February 6, lSoo'
 Standard Chemical oi5 ,,an ,Sompangg Iouisviile and Nashville Railroad Co., !TracL Connections at Andalusia and transfer charges. Petition denied, with snfaTence to track connection. Matter of reasonableness Of transL1r enArses Uaserved for further consideration.
 Central of Georgia, Ky cos~-Appli- oatton for approval of Alabama Local Tarteg No 5-Applicable between sta tions In Alabama. Tariff examined and a,nnroved subject to revision at any SPtp Sntmre time President Conner dissent ing and declining to approve.
 Arthur & Bros, vs. southern KY. co.
 1anot accommodation at Mulberry rank Ala. Continued until February ,b' I'Vg McCants vs. Louisville & Nash
 R-Depot accommodations at SNII,.a,vheek. NI.'T Ala. At request of com Ntt~art inc above cause was dismissed WInV smith, ct als. vs, Louisville X N-sshviiIe, R. R. C.-Depot accommoda- ttons st Marberry, Ala. Continued un- Ill FT"r InnHs uS Hmey vs Frisco System.- ssnsrste accommodations for white snd coIored passengers waiting for trsirs st Fldridge. Ala. Upon the writ