The Cairo bulletin., 1906-05-24
APPLICATION or THE LAW.

Right Of School Directors to Pro
hibt Footbalt--Tha pIainiiG was sus-
pended from school for viola ing an
order of the directors prohibiting tae
pupil from playing in -uch a game
and brought an action Of mandamls
70 compel them to relnstatc him tn
board demurIe5 20 MS petition. auf
Judgment was rendered far defend
ants which wa SUI aimed b. the su-
eme court TIC eonr holds. thU
Under a statute auth riziBe sob
directors 10 make Futes AMI regu'a+'
lions for tbo government OF pupils
The board az directors ~ q hieh Chico
IA authority 10 prohhl pgpi Of ~
rhool fiona playing football in Al
same parportlpg he playei rrder
he auspices Of fhe school by a tear
Supporting TO epre eat The school. al
houeb the game b not p'avaa e
ehool hour or on or naa~ tie school
grounds.
tin7eT Us pirac orr los n w Rep
$50 (owal
:, Wrnesr- immunity o. Corporstiar
from Testhying CT Ground CT selfin
eriminsticn-An i7tere ing case on
the richt IF repres ntatiye. office
or employees of corpo alton to refuse
to testify on the ground Of self.
was very recently handaJ
down by the United States supreme
court. The proceeding originated in q |
subpoena duccs tecum, issued Ap,il |
IS. 1905, commandlG ne Hale to aD |
pear before the grand jury az tim |
and place named. 10 "test ~ ana give /
evidence In n certa n action now pend !
Ing in the circuit court Of tn |
United State for ne Southern dis !
irict of New York b..ween tho United |
State Of America and the Am 7rica9
Tobacco company and MacAndrews q
Fcrhc- Co on the rat Of the United |
states and tia on bring with vor
and produce ar the time anl place
aforesaid Gotta n documents which are
'ot forth" Petitioner appeared before
he grand inv In obedience 10 the
uhpoona Afr stating hi residence
T8tne and the fact that he was gccre-
larry OF fhe MacAndrews Is Forhes
o. he declined TO answer an the
pu7stion in regard 10 their hu mess
rs Officers the location Of it's off CO
and ifs agreements with other com
nanie he was thcreupou advi cd by /
DE a-sIstan district attorney tdat this
vea a proc ling mdp~ the sherman |
act 20 protect trade AMI ,ommercg |
7~ainrt unlawful re- taiut ana mon1p I
'lic The witness q n persisted In hi /
refu Al 20 apswer an due tions ne /
llso d sCliued 90 troauca The paper 4
and docunen called fer in the /
mhpopna. because thcy might tend 10 /
Incgiminato him Whe-eYpon th /
land Jury reported tat matte 10 the /
@0u-t. and male repre- cniaiion that |
Hale was i7 co1tenp-. and that Sc
n-tper proceeding should De taken /
Thsreupnn Al tho parties appeared Do /
frre the circuit judge. who directed /
fho So trces 90 an ver TIE que 'tons !
ana produce the papers Wit 1sr st'n /
refused The cIcuit Judge thereun~u /
held him to he in con emit ami com
mittei hiw'fo n custody nf ihs
herig hptu be- houlI am We tleI
We tiors and n-oiu-e thc paper Al
WI. ~ hshsa- rn1e wa tnrregpon
Ered ont. and be1- 2 hal before
another judge of the same c.rri. woo
discharged tho wri. and remandeI tfei
witnc Thr Jnhoi STAT supreme
court al uci tha' "Th. privilege
aelir-' s-iriucriuinstien sn1rscI tyt
the l'n1si state Con Imli1n. Hfhl
swendme1 i purely re- on,l o. the
witness and Dc ca-7rt claim t1e priv
iieEo ~ another per N. NJ r. tar CO.
pcrsii-u 1f vai-l Dr. is en- lFi.e- or
=mp'1Ye
Hsle rs H-nte' r. -rrre-r
CERT Cen.oa Giles s1sr~b o.. 1905