Bisbee daily review., 1906-09-05
ARIZONA PEOPLE INSENSAT|0NAl
 DIVORCE CASE
Husband Alleges That While Wife Was in Phoenix She
 Had Gay Time.

Fairly reeking with sensations, Den yer has divorce case pending that promises to draw into the vortex two Arizcnans, one of them residing at Phoenix and the other at Mar:copa Junction.
 Mrs. Alice M. Dunlap. wife of James B. Dunlap of the Dunlap Wal paper company, who recently sued her husband in Denver for divorce, be- cause she says her husband com plained that she could not cook like plaint in the Denver county court, alleging infidelity and making Gather inc Cody, Dora Clark and Kitty Kin ney correspondents.
 Dunlau has fidled his answer and cioss-complaint, in which he denies the charges made by his wife, but says she is the guilty one. and makes George T. Johnson of Phoenix, Ariz., Martin J. Mognett of Maricopa Juno tion., Ariz., and others correspond ents. t
 "He cursed me and said could not make pies like his mother used 10 make, and said put too much S: It in the oatmeal, and said 1t was a d shame that he did not have q woman that was any good" says Mrs. Dunlap, in long string of allegations.
 When asked by persons if he was rot the son-in-lay of my father, M-. Mcintosh, he would reply: Yes. hut don't consider it any honor to be a member of the family"
 Mrs. Dunlap also alleges that while she was at Phoenix. Ariz., for her health her husband associated with Dora Clark and permitted her to wear Mrs. Dunlap's clothes.
 Dunlap denies that by reascu of his treatment his wife was compelled to go to Arizona for her healtr. pur aI- ieges that after she went to Arizona she immediately began leading a prim- rose life.
 'Lulled into security from letters from my wife which led me to believe that she was regaining her health ard behaving herself in Arizona. I later learned that she was spending her nights with one George T. Johnson. at Phoenix, and attending dances and other places not proper fo. lady to attend" ayers the husband.
 ''Forgetful of her own shame and the humiliation which it would bring upon the defendant. plaintiff caused her picture to be taken with Johnson while resting in his arms in sug- gfm.s.aerny in mi ar'i.u sh. dihr rb gestive position and retained said pie ture in her possession in order 10 show her contempt for defendant, even showing said picture to defendant and saying:
 " This is the man 1 love. I
 After her return to Denver she kept up regular correspondence with Johnson and Mognett. receiving the letters atDenver through her mother" declares Dunlap.
 Tn June, 1906, she received a letter from Johnson. and when I demanded the same she tore it to pieces and then placed the pieces in her mouth TO prvent me from reading it." alleges Dunlap But I seized her by phyc- ical force. took the fragments of the letter from her mouth and have it to offer in evidence to the court
 The defendant has the hotel register from Maricopa Junction, Ariz., which he claims, shows that Mrs. Dunlap and Martin J. .Mognett occupiel ad- joining rooms at the Edwards hotel. while sine was returning to Denver. He also has the photograph which. he alleges. was taken with Johnson, which will be offered as exhibits in the case. s
 MT. and Mrs. Dunlap were married at Denver June p, 1898.