The Montgomery advertiser., 1906-11-24

ployes for the violation of saId pre-. tended ordinance and the stoppinf oi ! the operation of its cars is unjust, ference with your orators business, resulting in great inconvenience 70 the traveiing public and disaster. loss property pra aay~ Fights s sS and franchssss; and the authorities of the eaid city ok Montgomery have announced that they propose to continue such uniawfr. vd,,r orators cars In derogation of your ora. tors rights under It's contracts with the city of Montgomery by which franchises for the operation Of It's line: in contravention of the provis. ions of the fourteenth amendment t1 as well ac of the provisions of the Constitution of the State of Alabama; whsrs1oFs your orator I.xSna makes scEe scie dant to this, your orators bill of com platnt. and prays that process issue 70 1t requiring 1t to plead. answer or de. within the time required by law, and the rules Of this Honorable Court. and in accordance with the note below.
 Ss orst9T % fgstas Canss to Ss sansd o1t function restraining the said City Council Of Montgomaery; ;nn,ny.s its omGs5n; frsm eiiforcinE, or from attempting to en- force tho provisions of the said RFser tended ordinance, adopted by the Cisy cSIIns cSIss Is 0a ans2ss M2etsqs@eslSi so sSis h Es or ore causing to be arrested Sr detained os %prsSnes aSS sSoye. SnS of os ns our for the alleged violation of said pre- tended ordinance, and that after s . ilnal hearing your ya.s, aonpr .,'d VII wtIl Ss dss clare aud decree the said ordlnanSa v be nnreasonabls. Illegal and veid.
 Judge sayre,e Order. JusiEs Sayre directed the following or- der to ReEiater RWrkas
 sTJpnn consideration of the sworn bili of complaint in this cause. ana tne com function, 1t Is ordered, adJudged and ds- creed by khe court that. when the com plainant or some one for It enters lnto or pIu surettes to be approved by the Reg ister, and payable and conditioned as required by law tn ordinary eases or injunction, the Register will issue an S'ef prayer Of the biii in this cause. 10 stand until the further order of this court: said injunotion must not De SSas'Ins9 tSnr prosAc1tion @ % of m any charges ai-, ready begun and pending against the complainant or its agents for the vto- lation of the ordinance passed over the Mayors veto of the 18th day of octo-
 Upon the Traction Company making It's bond. which was immediately done, Register Parks issued the writ of in- junction. In accordance with the order Of the court. The writ concludes:
 tBut nothing herein shall prevent the, prosecution of any one already arrested for the alleged violation of said ordi- nanca4fe ElH
 This is regarded fin law as only temporary injunction, although no def mite time is set for 1t to expire The legal representative of the city will, in all probability, file a demurrer or some legal paper denying the suficiancy of the equity of the bill. and asking that the temporary injunction may be dissolved.
 Argument will then be had by the respective counsel upon this proceed ing, this likely going to the merits of the case, and the injunction being made perpetual or dissolved, according to the decision of the court as to the legal points involved in the case.