The Washington herald., 1906-11-08
DISTRICT COURTS.
Court of Appeals.


Present: The Chief Justice, 3lr. Justice McC0mas
and Mr.. Justice Robb
Richard Z. S. Tooiney was admitted to practice.
10 les. United States ex rel Roche vs. Hitch
cock: argument commenced BY J. Z. Laskey for
appellant continued by f. +. Best and D. W.
Baker for appellee and concluded b. J. L. Brad
ford for appellant.
No. 1855. Rultz vs.. Jaeger, continued by Etipula-
ton.
No. 1872. In re John H. AdFiaans. member Of
the bar OF the Supreme Court. District Of Colum-
bja: argument commenced by J. S. Easby smith for
appellant
No. 1871. MoGowan vs. Elroy ct al decree dis
missing bill of review modified 50 as TO read With
out prsjudics % the appellants and as 50 modified
affirmed with costs Opinion By Chief Justice
Shepard
No 1853 Hau vs.. Roome: Judgment affirmed
with costs Opinion by AIr. Justice 8fcComas.
No. 1873 Columbia National sand Dredging Com
psny ct al vs. Morton e al: decree reversed with
costs and cause remanded. with direction 70 dis
miss the bill Opinion By Chief Justice Shepard.
No 1850 5Iutchins vs. Mum: Judgment affirmed
with costs opinion By Mr. Justice Robb.
No. lee0 Toledo Computing Scale Company vs..
Garison; judgment reversed with costs and cause
renanded for another trial IN accordance with the
opinion Of this court. Opinion BY Chief Justice
Shepard.
No 1851 Bronson vs.. Brady; Judgment affirmed
with costs. Opinion b. Nlf. Justice Robb
fmed with costs. Opinion By Chief Justice
Shepard.
No. 1861 Brown. executor vs. Grand Fountaia.
United Order Of True Refouners. et al decree re-
veFsed with costs and cause rgmanded for decree
in conformity with the opinion Of this court Opin-
ion by SIR Justice Robb.
No l7g. Keroes ys Richards; Judgment az
hImed with costs Opinion by Chief Justice Shepard.
No l702 United States vs. Evans et al appeal
dismissed. Opinion hy Chief Justice Shepard.
No TB. United States vs.. Evans et al. ildg-
meut reversed aud cause remanded foT further pre-
ceed5ngs IN conlormity with The opinion q thls
court. Opinion b. Chief Justice Shepard
No 1871. Fifth Congregational Church vs.. Bright.
trustee. decree reversed with costs and cause re
mauded with directions 20 enter a decree ~ con
fomity with The opinion of This court. Opinion ts
3lr. Justice Rohb
No 1874. Fifth ConsresatlonaI Church vs.. Bright
trustee ct al. appeal dismissed with costs. Opn-
ion by Mr.. Justice R0bb.
Assignments FOX THURSDAY. November 6. 1896:
On hearing;
No. 2 In re John H Adriaans. Appellants at
torney. J. 5. Eashy-smith appellee's attorneys, W
F. Mattiugy and H. p Blarr.
! Special calendar:
40 s Miller vs.. PAYNE. Appellants attorneys
{ J. II. Wilson, J. II. Wilson, T., and John Ridout
/ appeIlee's attomeys Thompson a. Hendler.
No. 6. Daily vs. Mccarthy. Appellants attorney
P r. Hillisrd, appclecs attorney, L. A. Bailey.
Ne. Z. Crawford vs. United States Appellants
attorney. A 5. WoTthingtOn. appellce's attorney
I ID. ". Baker
/ No. s. Lipphsrd vs. Humphrey. Appellants az
f tornsys. Chaplin Bro~n and c. II. Bagmani ap
pauee's efr0meys y. I. Leighton ard g. C. James
No. O. Robinson IS. Palmer. Appellants attGr
uU. c. Il. Meulat: aTpellee's attorney. d. "
Baker.
/ No. e. United States use q DAILY rs. Msefsrsu3
/ Appellants attorney, l. A. BaileT; appcL!eas at
! torHegs = H. Thomas and 7. Il. stephens
! No. l3 United States * EEL Reinach vs. Cor
/ telyou. Appellants attorneys. L. A Bailey aEl
/ Ivan Hcdsnan; s9pelee's attorney, Il. X. Glss
I sic.
No Is Nash vs District q Columbia Appel
/ Isut's attorney. George =. Hoover; appe,lees a.
I torney. Z. II Thomas
Ne % United States eX rel Smithson vs.. Ash
/ ford. Appellants attorney. b. T. Leighton; sp
peIees attorney Z. II. Thomas.