Bismarck daily tribune. [volume] (Bismarck, Dakota [N.D.]) 1881-1916, 1906-09-15
SUPREME court
CALENDAR
-. =. ''r."~. - '..,-
LIST oF@cAUsEs TO BE TRIED AT
THE GRAND FORKS AND BIS
q MARcK TERMS
OF THE SUPREME COURT AND
THE ATTORNEYS INTER-
EsTED.

- y ~ q
+ The calendar for the supreme court
terms to be held at Grand Forks
September IS and the Bismarck term
October is. is as follows:
GRAND FORKS SESSION. :
John Murphy and James Murphy, as
Murphy Bros, eopartners, appellants,
VS.. J. &c. Foster, respondent: Steele
county; attorneys, w. J. Courtney, G..
S.. Shippy. ,4nE,,,@ ..e~. 49,.
| Ole l.. B1 emseths. and Anna Brem-
seth, appellants, VS.. o. B. Olson,
sheriff of Trail county, respondent;
Traill; E. P. Totten, P. G. Swenson.
A. B.. Farquhar Company, limited,
appellant and respondent, VS.. w. H.
Highham, appellant and respondent;
Grand Forks; Skulason & Skulason,
w. J. Mayer.c>@'s@@ .~,<.~ ~ . ....-.,. .,55r
G. B. Nystrom, appellant, VS.. John
Lee, Respondent; Nelson; Skulason &
Skulason; M. "A. Shirley, Scott Rex.
1. The Hong hton Implement Co., ap.
fpellant, VS.. Frank Vavrousky, respond.
emit; Walsh; Bosard & Bosard, Myers
& Myers.
Thomas J. Smith, appellant, VS.. Ed.
win T. >Spafford, and Arthur F. Turner
as sheriff of Grand Forks county
respondents; Grand Forks; IF. B. Feet.
ham, Bosard & Bosard.
VIM. III. Brown, appellant, VS.. Lewis
Comonow ct all, respondent; Ramsey;
Burke ~ afiddauE h, s4MgC Glory, 81 Bar.
nett, John W. Maher. ~ "
Torber Nelson ct al, appellant, VS.
Julia Thompson, appellant; Grand
Forks; r. M. Carothers, Guy C. f.
Corliss; Skulason & Skulason, F. B
Feetham.
First National Bank of Pomeroy, ap.
pellant, VS.. J. X. Butterey, respondent;
Grand Forks; Skulason & Skulason;
J. H. Bosard.
II James Smith, respondent, VS.. Hall
Kunert, appellant; Foster; Parks &
Olsberg; J. A. Dwyer, C. e. Wolfe.
Martin Martinson, appellant, VS.
George Marzolf and Millie Marzolf
respondents; Mclean; Hanchett &
Wartner, Cooler & Goer.s
The Moline Pillow Co., a corporation
appellant, VS.. Sylvester D. Bostwick
respondent; Walsh; spalding & Siam
baugh, Myers & Myers. -
n State Finance Co. ct al, respond
ents,: VS.. Claus H. Halstenson and
Mary S. Hodgson, appellants; Nelson;
Marion Conklin, Wicks, Paige &
Lamb, Fred A. Kelley, Erich & Kelly;
Skulason & Skulason.
"a. p. Sheets, respondent, VS.. w. B
\, Prosser, ppellant:: Nelson; Scott Rex,
Erich & Kelly. E.. 4s s.%:s IS. s%- s. e
I. p. B. Scott, appellant, VS.. The North.
western Port Huron Co, respondent;
i TrailI; John Carmody, n. G. swenson;
II w. 2, Dodge,
i q. B. Cook. respondent, vs. s:.;M
4 Lockerby eliant;; Barnes; John e.
Greer, Turner & Wright es$ IL
p Delafeld, respondent, VS.. e. R.
Bradley, appellant: Ward: +. Baldwin,
Turner & Wright. IN s5@s ssss..
]. IL. Owens Co., a corporation, ap-
pellant, VS.. Thomas Doughty, respond
emit; Foster; Turner 8 Wright, T. r..
McCue. sSs ~. III
Charles w. Johnson. respondent, VS..
3. K. spoonheim and Paul X. Spoon
helm, appellants; Grand Forks; skula-
son & Skulason. George A. Bangs.
John YaHelly and B. r. Brockhoff,
Iappell ants, VS.. Board OF Park Commits
sioners Of the Park District Of the city
Of Grand Forks. ct al. respondents;
Grand Forks; Geo. A. Bangs, Scott
Rex.
The North Dakota Horse and Cattle
Co, corporation, respondent, VS..
Silver serumgaard, appellant; Pierce;
al q. Cbger: Guy g. M. iCorliss; Guy
III. Wshitemore, Scott Rex.
George w. Ferris and Jemima
Ferris, respondents. VS.. Anton Jensen,
appellant; Foster; Parks & olsberg;
4 W. O. Lowdon. s. e. Ellsworth,
State of North Dakota, respondent,
VS. s. s. Richardson and Il. n. Carroll,
1appeliants; Ward: George Al MCGEE,
John 81 Greene.
l3sz