Burlington weekly free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1866-1928, 1906-03-22

the submission of certain police rules the
plaintiff announced that there WAS no re-
buttal and the case was closed.
NEW ENTRY DOCKET.
The new entry docket made its appear
ancc Friday. 1t includes the following
cases:
Civil cases-Kate NJ. Vaughn. guardian,
Us. Henry Ballard, apt. eiectment; j. II.
I.avell, a DIN. vs.. Michael Teddy, apt.
respass: George r. Wiley vs. Harty G..
lianley, trespass: Albert G. Collins vs.
Joseph w. Farley, petition TO set aside
Judgment; Irving F. Hobart vs.. Alexander
g. Alard. auullmcnt of marriage; Fred
erick NJ. Sheldon vs.. Adelbert j. Payne,
and Richford Foundry company, IT,, apt,
assumpsit: Hunting ton Piano company ".
Luke w. Hall, apt. trovcr: Francis Doom
and wife VS.. +. +. Johnson, apt, tres
pass Mary Fletcher hospital ". e. v.
Richardson. assumpsit; Frank Brand and
W. y. I'inev vs.. J.. j. Wtherel. aSsump-
sit: Ira Chase vs.. Fred nushcY. roplovin;
Eva Brooks vs.. Henry Mossoy. hastardy:
Matilda Lemieux vs.. David Bouffard. baS-
tarN.
Divorce cases Phebc Murphy vs.
Charles Murphy ,pctition for support.
Clarissa Grannis vs.. Harry \. Grlnn's,
NJ. Lena Duraud vs. Peter Durand, Caro-
line Keniston vs.. George w. Remission.
Rosa My"rson vs.. Isaac Inversion, Emily
/. Davis ". Alfred Davis, Alfred ~.
Davis vs.. Emily |. Davis. George g.
Rolio vs.. Elizabeth Bolio, Minnie Demase
VS.. Edward Demagc, Daniel lombard
VS.. Lena lombard. j. w Morrow vs.. Al
media NJ. Morrow, Josephine Dol"rme W.
William Dclorme. Myrtle Cady vs.. Amos
f. Cady, Charles A. Murphy vs. Phcbo
= Murphy. p. A. H. Baker vs.. Eleanor
K. Baker, Lena Bomhard ". Daniel Bonn
| ba I'd Eleanor Baker vs.. +. \ l.. Hak"r.
| pelrize Mongeon VS.. \. -. Nongcon.
| The new chancery entries are as fol
! lows: Eugene A. Smith vs. Anna NJ.
| Knott et ais. bill and injunction; RurhnG-
ton Trust company VS. William and Mar
tin Butler, foreclosure; l.. +. Wilbur vs.
Frank u. Howe ct ais. foreclosure. Hat
tie s. lIolabird vs.. Alfred :. Ii"lm"s, Of
ais. foreclosure: Maxim Godott" and doc
Goddette VS.. John Martin and Lucy Mar
tin. foreclosure; Northern Provision com
pany vs. Wells Howard ct ais. foreclos-
ure: Eli r. IIolbrook vs. Noah f. and
! Lucia T.. Phelps, foreclosure Homer j..
| Powell VS.. Frank Il. Hunt ct ais fore
| closure: Clayton j. and clinton ;. Wright
Tvs Scymourc A. and Clarence u, cas-
| we'll.
| The session Of county court was "htrc-
lly occupied Monday with IN" arGu-
Iments in the case Of MARY NJ. strong
| Vi the Burlington Traction 60. The open
| ing argument for the plaintiff was mad'
Iby Il. G. Mower and he WAS followed ny
! 4 Rullard for the defense,
The divorce petition brought by Rosa
| Mycrson VS.. Isaac MYcrson was hoard
| Monday afternoon and a bill was grant
ed on the ground Of refusal to support
The case of Mary NJ. strong VS. the
| Burlington Traction Co, was submit
| ted to the jury TUESDAY afternoon. The
concluding argument for the deten-
| dant company was made by L. Il
| Brown and G. s. Palmer closed for the
| plaintiff. The charge by Judge Miles
| was delivered and the jurors took the
| case
At $50 p. m. the jury had agreed
| on "A verdict and it was announced. Judge
| Miles and Assistant Judge Allen being
| IN attendance. The jury awarded the
| plaintif damages of 5000, together with
| her costs. 1t was announced by counsel
| for the defendant company that the case
would probably so to the supreme court
| ON exceptions.
The case of Adolph Hattie vs.. Louis