The Caldwell tribune. [volume] (Caldwell, Idaho Territory [Idaho]) 1883-1928, 1906-02-24

operative Ditch Co., inviting tn
Directors and Attys. of their Com
panies to be present at a meetin,
in Boise Feb. 9TH. for the purpose
OF fully canvassing the matter of al
g appeal from the decision of Judg,
Stewart in the Boise Valley Wate
Case.
1t is resolved that the invitation
be accepted by this Board and it
Atty.
The following bills were read
s approved, and warrants ordered
81 drawn.
: NO. NAME FOR AMT
D7 Cal Roe Labor s 8 8,
3Os H. M. Hedges Supt Salary $50 q
: 300 Dot Dement, Janitor work 800
i 10 Maybel Dement, Clerks Salary SO OF
III H. M. Hedges Expenses %
X ~ Rice & Thompson Attorneys Fees 100 OF
'l3 r. E. Simmons Material 60
sl4 N. s. dis Directors service is 90
i15 G. l.. Calkius , 70 90
'l6 l.. E. Grecnslet >, >, 90
81 Ballantyne. Dee
Mere. Co. Material 8 80
ns Caldwell News Mat & Warrant call so
= il9 Central Lbr. Co. Coal 60
Z 800 Cooper Lbr. Co. Coal oe
4 ~ W. s. Hammond Refond on Tax sale 4s
Total 1851 O9
There being no further business.
the Board adjourns until 2:3o P. M.
Feb. 9TH, 1906 at the City HALL
Boise.
Attest: Approved:
II. M. HEDGES, N. S. DIS,
Secy. Pres.
Boise, Idaho, Feb. 9TH, ago P. M.
On this day and hour the Board
met pursuant to adjournment.
Present, the full Board and
Hedges, Secy.
The other Canal companies repre-
scented are as follows: New York \
Canal Co., by Mr.. w. c. Annett,
Pres, D. R. Hubbard, Vice Pres,
Edw. Smith, Secy., w. H. Comp
ION and David Paynter, Directors,
and Geo. L. Cole Director of Lat. 4
eral Co. Riverside Irrigatir,g Dist.
riot by Atty. ]. c. Rice. Settlers
Canal Co. by Atty. Carl A. Davis.
Mr.. w. c. Annett was elected E
chairman of the Joint meeting and
Il. M. Hedges Secy.
Mr.. J. c. Rice addressed the
meeting and called attention to the
TACT that aside from the economy OF
Joining together in the expense OF
having the record printed, great
advantage would be secured by
making the appeal joint affair, in
the moral backing that would be
given it.
He also stated, that few excep-
tons had been taken to the rulings
of the Court in the trial of the case
and that therefore few legal CUES
tons could be raised upon appeal.
The issue to be raised in the higher
Court woul ! be insufficiency of the
evidence upon which the decision
was based.
Mr.. Edw. Smith. Secy. of the
New York Canal Co., stated that
the meeting was called after dis
cussion with representatives of the
various bench Canal Cos. as to
The advisability of appealing the
case. 1t being the general opinion
that an appeal should be taken and
a meeting held to arrange for the
equitable division of the expense
involved in such appeal. Six OF
the Bench Canal Co.'S. having H
agreed, he said, to join in the e
appeal.
Atty. Carl A. Davis. representing a
the Settlers Canal Co., said that
company would join in the appeal.
and a movement for the division
Of the expenses and suggested that
committee be appointed to work
but the details of the proposition. Is
After some discussions the follow
ng motion by Edw. Smith, second
ID by Mr.. dis was carried: That
the matter of perfecting the appeal
be referred to a committe COM r
posed of the attornys OF the
several Canal Companies appeal II