Morning appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1877-1906, 1906-04-10

| officers ca ged the duty OF ad-
ministerlrg en- 12S u. S. 313.
! In re Wo0ley i ny. 80 / was held
lat to incotp rate into a p> ton for
rehearing re settlement that Your
| .-onors hav rendered an unjust de-
! cree" and Otho in Eulting matter, is
! TO commit IN oDen court an act con-
stituting contempt on the part of the
| attorney: and hat where the Ian
| guare spoken or written is OF itself
necessarily offensive, the disavowal OF
an intention to commit contemnt
! may tend to excuse but cannot justify
the act From a paragraph in that
! opinion we quote:
| can attor~av may unfit himself for
! the n actice # his profession by the
manner in which he conducts himself
| in his intercourse with the courts. He
may be honest and capable. and yet
/ he NAV so pduct himself as to cCntin-
ually interrupt the business of the
courts in which he practices; or he
| may by a systematic and continuous
course of conduct. render it impossi-
| BILE for the courts to preserve their
self-respect and the respect of the
public and at the same time permit
him to act as an officer and attorney.
An attorney who thus studiously and
Systematically attempts to bring the
tribunals of justice into public con-
tempt is an unfit person to hold the
position and exercise the privileges Of
| an officer of those tribunals. An open
notorious and pubic insult to the
| highest judicial tribunal of the State
e., for which an attorney contumac'o"sly
refuses in any way to atone, may JUS
tify the refusal of that tribunal TO
recognize him in the future as one of
it's officers"
In re Cooper. 80 VT s62, the re-
spondent was fined for ironically stat
ing to a justice Of the peace. 4 think
this magistrate wiser than the SUI
prene court RedheId, C. J., said:
The counsel mist submit in a JUS
tice court as we'll as in this court,
and with the same formal RESPECT
howe, err difficult. it may he either
here or there"
| I'VE do not see that the relator has
any alternative left him but the sub
mission to what lie no doubt regards
as a misrepresentation of the law both
on the part of the justice and of this
court And in that respect he is in a
!
have failed to convince others of the
soundness of their own views, or to
became convinced themselves o ftheir
falacy"
In Mahoney V. State, T. " E. Isl
: an attornev was fined $50 for saying
81 want to see whether the court is
! right or r,ot Walt t. En)W whether
am going to be heard in this case in
10 srSo or
and making other insoIent statements
, In Redman " State IS Ind. the judge
, informed counsel that question was
, improper and the attorney replied
''If We cannot examine our witnesses
he can stand aside" This Language
, was deemed offensive ana the court
prohibited that particular attorney
r frcm examining the next witness.
+ In Brown " Brown Nv Ind. 72I. the
lawyer wac taxed with the cost of tbs
action for fling and reading petition
= for divorce which was unnecessarily
. gross and indicate.
I'll In Mccormick " Sheridan: 80 p ~
7S Cal ga petitior for .rehearins
: stated that how or why the honorable
+ commission SHOULD have so eftectuallJ
: and substantially ignored and disre
> We do, not know It. seems, tact .rei
{ fther the transcript nor our briefs
? could have fallen under the commits
a sioHers observation, A more disin
I geuious and misleading statment d
d the evidence cold not we'll be. NADIA
q II ia substantially untrue aud unwpy
+ santed- The decision seems to US t
4 be q traveFsitv IT the. evidence Hen
& | that counsel dr8fting tho petition ~,
4 guilty of contempt committaai jns tAt
q face of the court. Notwithstanding
+ disavoNa} of disreepectfui tntenAtoe
!. A Ape Of ,t4ee was iWRpsed with an .
mt1tttasof. serffDSsinajaiEs s;s II {;
70 s-.1ha. Chief Justice speakins1for u
r eonrt In State '. hnsriif. L. AK IN
I said:
al If it vas the sepeeste1abit of th
4 cHnanuitv to dsneYnoaS degrade. an
II distes1ea tia ,dscisieps and Judgment
r. n The. sosl<tzsI % man d seif-respec
K AID jhsts pride of(repn'seh,n w:,"d r.
It main utcepthe E1eudh. and syn oni
e would :. become ape sminiNters.cof -
3 law 3Atjwsfe insenaiale tfs dssSsnAec
t and coptehnrt Nut he9piiy fef xh
e sood order Of society. dhee. an espe'
t isliy ths people jof this country. AZ
to gasesan~ diapoefd tHAresoe"t an
Id abide the deeisAas ct the tribunal nal
IS asdained BY government ss @he -"
moa arbiters nf their rights. Br
c. where isolated .indNidsals, in viot'
IS ton of the better Instincts OF huma
a nature. and .aisregardfnl of Law an
t. order, wontaply attempt to obstrut
IT -ehe course OF piihlir Justice by disr'
'e garaing and sse4cttiAg, disrespect fe
ii the decisions O..Fi.s tfts,,na ;. cvey
ne good citizen will point them out
in proper subjects for legal animadve
sion.
A. A court must naturally look frst
ca anr snaistfepe4 apd conservative "a
us |<SaNernads By. A high sense OF Drote
=: sioilal ethics and deeD3y sensible .-s 1
d they always are. OF its necessity
~ Aidsin the maintenance Of public re
er Ipect for. it's opinions ,ss,