The Idaho Springs siftings-news., 1906-02-10
CAuCUST1RANNY.
DENOUNCED IN RESOLUTION ~
SENATOR PATTERSON.
SENATOR LODGE IN ACCORD
Caucus Rule Declared to Be in Viola
ton Of the Constitution-Duty OF
Each Senator to Vote According to
His Own Convictions.

Washington. The Senate was
treated to a distinct sensation Mon
day by Mr.. Patterson of Colorado, who
followed up his retirement of last Sat
urday from the Democratic caucus by
introducing in the Senate a resolution
in effect declaring the action OF the
caucus to have been contrary to the
constitution of the United States.
Apparently the senator's action was
unexpected on the part of the majority
OF the senators, and they listened at
tentively as the reading of the rather
long preamble progressed. evidently
not a little concerned at TO what
should come next
MIR. Patterson made no effort to Sc
cure the privilege of discussing the les
olution. but gave notice that he would
address the Senate upon it the next
day, or at the first available day af-
terward.
1t is expected that the Democrats
generally will resist the adoption of
the resolution and that the Republican
senators. under the lead of Senator
Lodge. will sustain MIR. Patterson's
contentious.
Mr.. Patterson's political fortunes, the
resolution raises new quesuo as to
the rights of senators generally, so
that there is much scope for animated
discussion and wide margin for differ
| ence of opinion. In all probability sew
eral days will elapse before the ques-
ton is settled
Senator Pattersons resolution was
as follows:
Whereas, The constitution of the
United States provides that the Sen
ate of the United States shall be COM
posed of two senators from each state
chosen by the legislatures thereof, and
that each senator shall have one yote;
and,
Whereas, Each senator before as
suming the duties of his Office is re-
quired solemnly TO swear or affirm
that he will support and defend the
constitution of the United States and
that he will faithfully discharge tie
duties OF the Office upoa which he is
about to enter; and
Whereas. Because il was currently
reported that one o. more Democratic
senators might vote upon a certain
matter pending before the Senate con-
trary to the views of a majority of the
body of Democratic senators, the Dem
ocratic senators were called to caucus
upon SUCH matters: and,
Whereas, II was found at such eau
Gus that said reports were correct and
that certain Democratic senators
might vote or would vote contrary to
the views of said majority; and.
Whereas, Thereupon the following
resolutions were presented and
adopted by more than two-thirds of the
senators present at said caucus: (Here
was inserted the resolutions adopted
b., the Democratic caucus.)
Whereas. The apparent purpose OF
said resolution and actions was i'm
properly to induce or coerce Demo-
cratic senators who might believe that
the best interests of the country re-
quired the ratification OF said treaty
and because thereof held it to be their
duty to vote for its ratification and
into disregarding that part OF their
oaths in which they declared that they
would faithfully discharge the duties
Of the office Of senator; therefore.
be 1t
Resolved, First, that such action by
the said or any other caucus is in
plain violation of the spirit and intent
Of the constitution Of the United
States.
Second, that for two-thirds or any
other number of the senators of any
party to meet and declare that 1t
shall be the duty OF any senator to
vote upon any question other than as
his own convictions impel him, is
plain violation of the manifest intent
and spirit of the constitution all have
sworn to uphold and defend.
Third, that the one vote the con
stitution declares each senator shall
have is his own vote and not the vote
of any other or of any number OF other
senators. and for senator to cast that
one vote against his convictions OF
right and duty in the premises is to
disfranchise his state in the Senate and
to deprive it of the representation in
that body the constitution provides it
shall have.
Fourth. that when any number of
senators. by combination or otherwise.
undertake through any species of coer-
ciop to induce other senators to vote
except as their judgments and con
sciences tell them. it is an invasion of
;he rights of a state to equal represen-
tation with c er states in the Senate
and is subversive of their rights to
equal representation and the votes of
its senators in the Senate that the con
stitution has provided for.
Fifth, that the senator who permits
any body of other senators to declare
and define for him what his duty is in
the matter of his vote in the Senate
and who casts his vote in response to
such interference, votes not as SEN
ator from his own state. but as a sen
ator from the other states, and he aug
ments the power of the other states be-
yond that permitted by the constitution
and weakens and degrades the power
of his own state in the Senate in vio-
latiton of the spirit OF the constitu-
ton.
Sixth, that for any senator to vote
except as his judgment and sense of