Bisbee daily review., 1906-12-28
MUST ANSWER CHARGES IF
 ISLANDER
Stock Claims He Was Arrested and Placed In Jail at Globe Because of Slanderous and False Reports About Him.
Special to Review.)


 i TOMBSTONE, Dec. 27.-Harry D. ,l Stock. through his attorneys, Messrs English and Gilmore, has brought an action for damages in the sum of $5.00O against w. w. Guthridge, for
 merly of Douglas, but who Is at pres ent resident of Santa Barbara, but
 who has considerable property in
 Douglas. The damages are asked foI on the grounds of islander.
 The complaint alleges that on the
 18th day of July the defendant. in con
 versation with Ethen Campbell, and
 in the presence of others. spoke the following words: He sold my fufn
 iture to you. He is a thief. he is g criminal, and should be sent to Yuma
 You should have him arrested" there by leading her to believe the plaintiff
 was guilty of felony. and that he
 should be convicted and sent to Yuma
 that Ethen Campbell subsequently, had
 him arrested at Globe and brought
 back to Douglas; that he was held al the iail in Globe for four days before being taken to Douglas; that when he arrived at Douglas the defendant had circulated the report around that he was to arrive on the train with the of
 ficers, so that there were a number of persons at the depot to see him when he arrived, all of which went to humiliate him and to his degrada. ton and damage; that August f, de fendant. in conversation with E. F Fisher, and others, called the plaintiff a felon, and that he was guilty Of numerous offenses.
 The defendant at a number of other times up to the first of December, the petition recites, was guilty of the same conduct. That on account of the remarks being constantly made by the defendant the plaintiff was shun. ned by his fellow lodge members of the Woodmen of the World. of which ne was member, as we'll as a num- Der of acquaintances: that on account of the defendant continually making these remarks and imputating that the plaintiff is felon and guilty of crime. he has been injured in his good name reputation and feelingAto his damage in the sum of $5,000. The property | of the defendant. consisting of three lots in block 65 in Douglas, and lot 10 on block 54, have been attached pend ing settlement of the suit. The de. ifendant has filed security bond in the sum Of S5000.
 The Bonanza Belt Copper company has filed an action against H. J. Cliff ford to quiet title to a number of claims .i in the Golden Rule district in the Dragoon mountains known as the Peabody group. These claims have been the subject Of much litigation during the past few years. and at the present time there are three different cases on the docket in the Distric Court in which the claims are in volved.
 Andrew Hartman has filed an actioI
 for debt against w. NJ. Plaster in ths sum of s1i30. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff and defendant enter
 ed into an agreement whereby the,
 were to erect severa; houses on the
 ground of the plaintiff in Dubache1 canyon. in Bisbee, and the parties to
 each take part of the proceeds frou
 the rent. That defendant has receiv
 ed most of the profits. and has failed
 to pay over the share of the plaintiffs The property in question has been at Iached pending settlement of tht
 suit.
 The Copper Queen company mas iiiei an action for debt against H. B. Nc Daniels iE the sum of $s10, alleged tt
 be due for goods, wares and merchan disc furnished the defendant durin; the past two years. A garnishee at tachment was issued against the de fendant.
 O. Gibson has filed an action in ths District Court against the Leadvill, Mining Company. George Maas ant the Michizona Development compan, for recovery of stock. and an injunc tion to prevent a transfer of the stocl being made The complaint aIlege that he has become the owner Of a number of shares of the Leadville company were transferred to him by Mrs. r. c. Lemon, J. H snyder. Miss Maud Arnold. Loui: Klein, Norton Morgan Commercial Co. and s. N. Kemp: that in May lso4. Maas obtained an option on ths capital stock and treasury stock of tn, LeadviiIe company and was to pur chase II, taking over the stock of tn, Leadville company by giving on, share of the new company he organ ized, known as the Michizona Devel
 opment company, for four of the Lead vile stock; that in view of the repre-
 sentaticns made to him by Maas an his agents the plaintiffs assignor.
 were induced to accept stock in tn, new company in exchange for thei stock in the Leadville; that thereafte Maas. or the Michizona Developmen company, failed to make the pay
 inents on the property as had beer agreed upon. and the property revert ed back to the original owners. The plaintiff further alleges that as soor as the plaintiff assignors discovered that the defendants had failed to take up the option they made a demand o1 Maas and the Michizona company To return of tneir respective shares O. stock in the Leadvillc company, offer ing at the same time to return tn, shares that they had received in tn, Michizona company, but that Maas o the officers of that company have fail ed and refused to return the stock The plaintiff further alleges that tn, stock has never been transferred ol .. the books of tn L.eadville company ~rd asks that he be granted an injunc tion, against the Leadville compan snd it's officers to prevent them iron making any transfer of the stock ol the books of the company or the certif
 cates. A bond of $20OG was filed il the case and temporary writ of iI .~-cficu issued to prevent any sa.f the stock or frausfcr pendfuc the iria