The Washington herald., 1906-10-10
FIGURES ON NEW YORK.
Some Calculations IndIcatiag the
. Hes,s Job thead of Hearst.

lrol- -te Er7okEn Eagle
TIE present political s.t,a;.an has been
lisered e. the campaign Of lsse. when
Grover CiovelaLd was elected Governor
by "a esaior.ty Of aH 5He votes east Of
some I58.ta T. IS. however,. cgi,e d.sslm-
iiar In IS>s :. l,.rge number 90 Eepubli-
cans. d3,iszea With conditions NItain
jheir par,y y fraiHed from se.ne o. tle
polls ou election aay \ few. co3npa.a-
tivciy. voted for cleveland. The Demo
Gratis voted faH streI 9Th f3g ,lc.f o~u
esH.did..t,
Ia i"G ihere Is .n'lar Haremea ou
thr far " Democrats toward ifGsb,s.
Eu- j, Is diss.mil.r in thas sHt. D,n.o-
rl,t~ propose tlsd thrir votes s.aii be
cast directly Tor 1iushe. T'4e -l.saJ.an
a.sf.Esliag iu iiai thef- is aoo.!er
m"Fe1...Lt-1Ee 0f Republicans e. ~ as.
As nigatior -! ta- Figures vii
Suggest ti.at t4c problem oi Sir. Hearst
Is a"t -a -t-y o:c. F. f1-t. 81 .ur-
mlGai. I.ast year ie raL .1i Mayor
;R-.ne E.rg 81: NeW York Ii., total
>"t- wa- r raHud euw5r- --5r-.
The combined ."l- a-ain-t bia. waS
.la.'eH Iia &as Then l4oepU si- rr ~
L majority Yet he .as e.lr a1.u.
500 short "f gi'aiity That was h,-
etH-r tlc ornos5.on WAS divided be
tween tvO candidate This t.tr De-. W W:ll
meet blt unr cprorenJ ANA 10 br Sic-
c'--~tui urrt iIvr u majority. iic muS
Therefore ua.he Ls- s7.u oH lis vote
oi l!rN
Comp ..s 5s.G e tha ueares of
i+" tir apt 10 nr .niS!g-dlng. Aic-
tlril.u received largo uiu4J... ~ Ee-
publican votes p ,la. 'umbrr .au.d be
determined tbt Democratic vote Hearst
received Tor Mayor rot-iG b- qt;itc ar-G-
-7lt'Iy arrived 80 j has been asserted
thar mo- fewer tHau @afD0 Republicans
voted for NcCIeii.m. = thar 5e true.
an McCleil1n received only ieS. sos Dem
rrIatir votes AZ Die vas entitled E. re-
ceit- as compared with previous Years.
-r..- D. Wo1li appear ;hst nearly one
H'-l oi t!.t DeWoctatir vote WORT ~
Hearst i'm la@. TIE question therefor ls.
VII Doe. uic.r present conditions. Demo
cratic estad-a1ta though ha S.. lr--lt,.
ans more iu IT@Z THder Ills showing
t he wer" 90 r"ceirc tm"c-quarters Of
IRE normal Democratic vote u IH,e 10
does aot appear that De could secure -
majority exceeding -5.gH in New York
Cuy.
Comparisons as to the State aut-ld, of
the city. based on th" figures uI the pre-
ri"us election f'r Governor are less diff
cult THfy Irr not complicated Dr. "a
third party 81 the field. Th. majority
OF Higgins over IIesrick was lsa usf ban
1906 The aggregate vote was s-S1I1. OF
which 5lL9i2 Was Republican ana s>sI.5
Democratic. At the first glance il would
appear that Sir. Hearst 81 ;hs part Of
jhe stale Co De sug, essfuI luuSf over
come majority 81 Ig9p3 That De viii
be- assisted 10y diScontended Republicans is
certain. But so what extent He VIII
Ee retarded by dissatisfied Democrats.
Estimates have been made which
assume ,hat the DenicratIc movement
,o Hughes VIII ameunt 10 ~ pc. cent Of
the Democratic vote. tnat that of Pc
pu5llcaus to Hearst viii be - Pc. r,ur.
Ia thar case tLe plurality would NOS De
le~sened bat rather increased from
ifp@5 20 l.e.0e since there would be n
Het EJin or 10 per ceat to the RpabIi-
cans II 81 We're reversed Air Hearst
would then have ID plurality up state of
some 22.e01