New-York tribune., 1906-10-25

oe reversed Only one case was settled although
.hefe We're sixty main issues with the counter
.,' e'ie total was over one hundred. The court
'ooh up case after case, and In almost every in
stance issued pro forna" order nassinr the dis
Pa'e UP 10 the Appellate Division. During the day
Arou' hity new cases were put on the calendar.
- r, lhe Independence League the Repub-
mean county Committee and the Board OF F1ec
ucns Were all represented nv co,,.a1 7. ,,as
SHOWN thaf many OF the cases vvere similar and
Aeueo as one. Mr.. Limberg counsel for
a., =. League, called the courts atten-
1oh 10 Whaf he said was the fraudulent handling
"a 'ne petitions OF Independence League
oaholoates. leaving them without suN7oiant Names
-, 80 the afhdavits and the positive proofs
- -, AtnOerg' that parts OF these petitions
ar t.' ana we will later call this matter to
Attorney" joy anu 'he Dis'rlc'
D@liei Z. Cohalan urged that the question was
oIo -. AAs properly came before the court He
T 'eo tne action of some of the Independence
Eeseue candidates who had tried to take an7davits
Board OF Elections N'S ol the
II. 80 ein0F BLACK appeared for Judge RosaIsky
tbora - was question in his mind whether
was any decision of the Board of Elections in
'4e", 1here were objections to Judge RosaIslr,,
ne salo; Rosalsky objected to McAvov 60 49,
Ty ulcIary Nomlnators objected to every one -rba
Doaro OF Elections had simply failed to sustain
VI tiie opJections The court passed the issue
10 the Appellate Division
The one case that was dacidaa ~ 49,.
oI Congressman Henry N. Goldfogle in the 9th Com
sIeSs district The court upheld Csoldfogls's Inda
pendence League certificate
The protest OF Francis f Sbobe- r,-,
lnee in the 18th District against heinp svoI,,dad
from tle use Of the Independence Ieagus smblsr,
was heard Mr.. Limberg said the petitions were
ample but that the day after fling the league
had found that although originally 100 in number
ueS Ado peen nangled and torn, whole sheets hay-
Ing been removed
MT Cohalan argued that there was no authority
- 10" LOT the incorporated members OF the Inde-
Pehoence League to usurp right that belonged to
the people of the districts-that of saving who
should run candidates under the emblem Jus
uce Greenbaum asked If the Independence League
corporation had copyright on the emblem. Mr.
LAtnherg said that it did have copyright but
10 the state ticket petition. and urged that that
Fight to the nae a1a as party and the exclusive
Senator Thomas C. Grady was recognized bv the
court ~ ~
M II hope, he said that Mr., I4nberg will remem-
paced on the Independence League petition said
executive board ala 9o a0f 94 d the OF the
mere Is 70 charge against you said the court
After recess the court listened to arguments on
tLnulvldua1 cases: The first OF these that OF
Charles E shober. The Tammany nominee also
sought TO get IN under the scales and his counsel
t sholer petition were forgeries: Mr. Lirnberg said
that ad the signatures were real BENJAMIN Berger
fet psTf ~ me deG5son OF the board asserting
cases the court also made the pro forrna order
senoing them TO the Appellate Division
Durlng the argument of one of the cases, H 3.
1ays te4t5 insisted on the iiegality Of Max Ihsen
signed the Independence League ticket petition
ana directing who should and who should not be
considered as candidate OF that league. I'VE
VII hold that Mr.. Thmsen is not the agent said
Riordan Tarnmany candidate in the sth Con-
EreSs District, appeared in his own behalf and
sSld that parts of his petition had been stolen
Phihp l. Mcguire stated. when his case was called
mat discrimination OF his petition had shown
that he did not have the requisite number Of
names This acknowledgment ended the case
Senator Grady again got the OF the court In
the afternon and repeated charges against Thomas
ROCK. counsel for Mr.. Rock denied the charge OF
forgery or fraud a pro forma order was issued
IN this also. $1,000
justice Greenbauno announced that the court
would take & recess to enable the lawyers to pre-
pare their briefs and orders. It was also stated
that the Appellate Division would hear appeals at
Il o'clock to-day.