The Birmingham age-herald. [volume] (Birmingham, Ala.) 1902-1950, 1906-12-18
Local Weather Data.
RECORD OF THE COURTS

Excess of rainfall since January l :. 7.SS
RECORD OF THE COURTS
Jures were quickly organized in all
the courts yesterday morning and bust
ness began with a rush, especially in the
city court, where large number of
cases were speedily disposed of.
Circuit Court.
In the circuit court the attorneys were
engaged during the day in settling the
pleadings in the case of Louis Cohn VS..
j. A Traub. This is a suit for breaeA
of contract the plaintiff alleging he had
six months contract with the defendant
as salesman and advertising agent while
the defendant states the plaintiff neg
nected his employment and went to see
baseball games The case is likely to
occupy the greater part of today
Circuit Court Docket.
The following docket is set for trial in
the circuit court today: w. l.. Butler VS..
Mayor and Aldermen of Birmingham,
damages; Charley Bisenlehner vs. Mayor
and Aldermen of Birmingham damages;
Tony Packard vs. Mayor and Aldermen
of Birmingham, damages; John Remling-
er VS.. A. j. Massey, ct al, damages;
w. H. Perrin VS.. Birmingham Railway,
Light & Power company, damages
City Court.
In the first division of the city court
yesterday a consent judgment for $500
was rendered in the case of Thomas C.
Robertson VS.. Birmingham Southern
Railroad company.
=. In the case of f. r. Penn Tobacco
company VS. Veitch-Young Produce COM
pany, a verdict was rendered for the
plaintiff for the sum of S441.26.
In the case of J. S. Pruitt vs. Brming-
ham Railway, Light & Power company,
the jury returned a verdict for the de-
PENDANT.
First Division Docket.
In the first division of the city court
following docket is set for trial today
Pabst Brewing company VS.. Erdrich
Brothers & Marx, assumpsit; Mrs. Mary
Walker VS.. Birmingham Railway, Light
& Power company, damages; John j.
Greer VS.. Adams Drug company dam
ages; Julian Huddleston VS.. Louisville &
Nashville Railroad company, damages
j. Il. Depositor VS.. Tennessee Coal, Iron
and Railroad company, damages; Rosa
T.. Evans VS.. Birmingham Railway, Light
& Power company, damages: Sam New
some VS.. Birmingham Railway, Light &
Railway company, damages; Narcissi
Chairman VS.. Birmingham Railway, Light
& Power company, damages.
Second Division.
In the second division of the city court
yesterday the following judgments were
rendered.
J.. Nj. Burkett VS.. Louisville & Nash
willie Railroad company, judgment for
s1275.
Chasmar- King Supply company VS. S. F.
King Judgment by default for S5,1S5.
Mayer Brothers VS.. S. j. PhilllpSon
Judgment by default for $3.50
Sam Field VS.. Alabama Great South
ern Railroad company, consent judgment
for 5000.
Sherrod Boazman VS.. William Mill &
company 800.
Flies & Son VS.. Birmingham Railway
Light & Power company, judgment by
agreement for $175.
The following cases were dismissed for
want of prosecution: F. A. Wheat vs.
ST Louis & San Francisco railroad; Max
j. Winlxler Brokerage company VS.. j. S.
Dubose: Goodlander Milling company VS..
Williams e Phillips; Coosa River Elec-
trio company VS. r. II. Cobb and Freed
man Keller & company VS.. George Ben
ME,
In the case of Nick Brooks VS.. Birming
ham Railway, Light & Power company
Ga chancery case, petition dismissed.
John H. Wallace trustee VS.. d. NJ.
Bremen ct ais. tchancery case), decree
for respondents.
Second Division Docket.
The following docket is set for trial in
the second division of the city court
today;
Ida Satterfied VS.. Fidelity Mutual Life
Insurance company, assimpsit; Jefferson
county Savings bank VS.. w. X. Smith,
asstlmpsit: j. II. Foster VS.. George Bur-
ford. ct al, ejectment; T. II. Cochran vs.
S. p. Spurgeon & Co., damages; An
drex j. McCarley VS.. II. X. White
Woodward Iron company VS.. Sam Stew
art, Arthur Weaver, w. L. Mclaughlin,
VIII Hurston. Ed Fritz, d. u. Burgin,
linn Baxley and Cephus Vines, eject
ment; Union Discount company VS.. st.
Louis & San Francisco Railroad COM
pany, appeal; Edwards and Turner VS..
Lacon Brick company assumpst.
chancery Court.
In the chancery court yesterday the
case of Booker City Land company VS..
Mary Williams was dismissed on motion
of complainant
Danne Stewart pro anne, vs. John
Stewart. petition for the sale of real es-
tate for distribution among minors
Cora Ewes VS.. Gilmore Bennett, decree
directing the payment of certain money
to complainant in relinquishment of
dover
Criminal Court.
In the first division of the criminal
court yesterday the following defendants
pleaded guilty, John Jones. Pete Meadows,
Jim Johnson, Bob Pickett, Jerry VIII
lams
Criminal Court Docket.
The following docket is set for trial
in the first division of the criminal court
today: State of Alabama VS.. Jim Willis,
John Henry Adams. Sam Scott. John
Smith Jim Kelly, Henry Walker Fred
Harrington, James l.. Langmore, Wal
tar A. Jones and ]. o. Williams.