Herald and news. [volume] (West Randolph, Vt.) 1878-1943, 1906-01-25
Windsor County Court.

The court was not quite able to finish up
the business of the term on account of the
large number OF divorce cases, some OF
which are contested. The following cases
were heard -
| Harold Harpin VS.. James II. Kiniry. An
| action 70 determine the title 10 some 30,
taken by the defendant from the Windsor
Town hall box office. Plaintiff had a
| show there ON shares for a week. The
first night the box receipts we're taken.
Part Of the amount taken belonged TO
plaintiff in any event and s1i.24 was re-
turned 10 defendant. The levy was made
on behalf OF some OF the actors. Plaintiff
claimed that the funds could not be thus
levied upon until the whole contract was
performed and the weeks performance
gwen. With the court, J. G. Enright for
plaintiff; Davis a Davis for defendant.
Jesse +. Jennings VS.. Susan /. Jennings.
Petition for divorce on the grounds alleged
of intolerable severity and adultery. The
case took about three days to thrash over
the matrimonial troubles OF the two. AT
the close Of the examinations and recrimi-
nations, the petitioner admitted he was
willing to have his wife come home and
attend 10 the household IL she would, and
not devote all her time to her father, AN in
valid pensioner. In this case petition was
dismissed. Davis d Davis for petitioner;
\ Pingree q Pingree for defendant.
Edward Macie VS.. Myrtle L. Macie.
The parties were married in April, 1901,
and lived at Hartland. In October, 1902,
the wife packed up and went away, as UNI
oerstood to New York city. The petit
tioner does not know where the wife now
is. VIM. Batehelder for petitioner.
Louella A. Reynolds vs. George W. Rey-
nolds. The petitioner lives at Hartford
and the parties were married in 1868.
George w. was fond OF young girls and
rum. and was inclined to indulge too
much in both. Pingree a. Pingree for PEE
titioner.
Jessie B. Hadley VS.. Francis j. Hadley.
This was Bridgewater ease and the par
ties were married in 1895 The husband
has never properly cared for his wife and
child, and two years ago dropped them en-
tirely, leaving them destitute. Charles
Batchelder for petitioner.
Grace II. Spaulding VS.. Merton j..
Spaulding. This was a Cavencish case,
the parties were married in 1898. Defend
ant was too attentive 70 a girl named
Polly Cannon. Cause alleged was intol-
cradle severity. S. +. Emery for petit
toner.
Anna L. Sawyer VS.. Joseph c. Enright.
This as an action on a bond. The de-
PENDANT was bondsman for one William
Guiles, brother OF plaintiff. She had COM
ing TO her from her fathers estate $3.50,
which William never paid over. He died
without paying il and this was suit to
recover it from the bondsman. IL was
claimed that Anna had had property from
her fathers estate to equal the amount OF
her claim. 1t was also claimed that Anna
had released the bondsman and agreed to
look to the administrator for her share.
Judgment was given to plaintiff for the
amount OF her claim. Davis ~ Davis for
plaintiff; Charles Batchelder for defend
ant.
State VS.. Roy Wright. Respondent
pleaded guilty 10 assault upon James
Parker at Weston on the 18th OF January.
Sentence, is months in house OF correction.
George +. Leland VS.. George A. Rice.
Action to set aside a justice judgment.
Petitioners evidence tended to show that
Rice mad agreed the case before the justice
should be continued. The court so found
and allowed the appeal. Fred G. Davis for
petitioner. Davis X Davis for defendant.
Fanny Rogers VS.. Charles w. Rogers.
This was a Cavendish divorce case; the
cause alleged was desertion. II. ii. Blan-
chard for petitioner.
Arthur Il. Rhoades VS.. Mestina H.
Rhoades. The petitioner lives at Balti-
more and asked for divorce on the
ground of adultery, upon which charge
the wife was out on bail from Windbam
county court on a state prosecution. ). T..
Emery for petitioner.
Medora Lewis VS.. Warren |. Lewis. Di-
vorce case from Plymouth. A cause OF in
tolerable severity was alleged. The par
ties were married in 1892. Stickney, Sar-
gent 4 Slxeels for petitioner.
l.. Louisa Hall VS.. George w. Hail. The
parties live at Chester and were married
in June, 1891. Cause alleged was intoler-
able severity. Davis q Davis for petit
toner.
L. Frank Lawton VS.. Evelyn Lawton.
The partie, live at Woodstock and were
married in 1901. The cause alleged is de-
sertion. J. c. Enright for petitioner.
Enoch Lockwood VS.. Laura A. Lock
wood. A divorce was asked for desertion
in 1874 Petitioner is nearly 10 years old
and lives at Reading. Davis a Davis for
petitioner. 500,
Charles A. Williams VS.. Bernice X. VIII
liams. Petitioner now lives at Woodstock
and was married to defendant in July,
1903. The parties were formerly OF Ran.
dolph. Causes alleged were adultery and
intolerable severity. NJ. NJ. Wilson for
petitioner. Petition dismissed.
Court has taken a recess until Monday,
Feb. 18th, at 2 p. m.