The Waxahachie daily light. [volume] (Waxahachie, Tex.) 1894-current, 1906-12-18

tggcs meet. and ooftAin evidence
feeding 90 show that the defendant
Waters rirtr~ Oh Co. became a
mem beF ol aud ynsarasi into said
agreement You are instructed that
she evidence is uot sufficient Ia shos
that defendant twrA ma member ~
aai3 organization II at aiI in q man
Hrf inst violates the trust laws ~
ibis sate and YOU sill therefore
Disregard ali testimony apon thtA
hrahch ~ The cape In The same tn
dtctmeut allegations eefe made that
the Maters-plcre" OIL Go. had enter
ed into exclusive contracts With some
~ lts customers just as thousands
~ other concerns hsd done and
were then doing la this state This
allegation wa~ made rs amendment
after thp higher courts had held I'm
another case that such contracts
w"fe In violation az the anti trust
law and had assessed a penalty OF
one Thousand dollars The }tsdg.
ment ia the Waters Pierce On case
was orroueouly drawn SO that the
penalty Of custer wa3 inflicted in
stead of fine The Judgment helnE
final. could not he corrected II was
at this juucure chat MIR Bailey in
terpvucd. aud seeing no other relief,
aud bgln2 assured br Mr Pierce as
we'll as the Judgment OF the court
cited above that HE Waters Pierce
oil Co was au independent concern.
be advised them 10 reoTeauize. come
into Texas and obey her laws. and
that 81 they would do this be felt
sure that they would rot be moleS-
tod For this advice MIR Bailey re
eeiyed nothing aud IL he had done
So We see nothing IN IL for which he
could now be condemned
The author very ugeniousIy
eyadcs q discussion ~ the draft
which rhe attorney general alleges
was drawn on the Waters Pierce Oil
Co, lay Mr. Bailey in favor of Henry
& Stubliug This is characteristic
of tine lawyer, 90 have the witness
state that, and only that, which sus-
tatns his case. and to suppress and
obscure that which tends to destroy
It. The positive denials from all
parties concerned. except Mr. Cru
cite, who filched the documents
from the private papers of his for
mer employer. together with Mr.
Balley's frank statement that if its
authenticity could be proved that he
would resign his seat in the senate,
have put a gag on the mouths of At
toruey General Davidson and the
enemies of Senator Bailey. We VEN
ture the assertion that If Mr.. Cru
cite We're teStifying against client
VI oui "a" 81 -au'hoi ne "ouIa pieah
W" y ilia 'es'iliionS ne'ole an, Jul
III i1inS COUNTY oii tne S'ounu 'iiaO
ne was an HIeSpohSiole 'li'eFihs
Mneip' me Jus liiS,9'9 enat
mn :; n'"n - pelhs 'Ileu' "neie
aol"Is,ilhS il'uie SdcIeu 70 nun man
VS., ,i.9 ''pei ~ ue"'e ~ nm man nio
ms ho"ol az S'ahv' Sucl q
nd q, (Si 10 e''''''eu ~ iuh 'ieol'
anu o on,3 .n... a., c.,.
g., ~ p"''GS - sun lnen' "lse .,'s
$50, % "uae ,,S Ga VI ,,e
,D'.' p',na nv a. 'p'''Iu o., t,ie
a,ins -, 49, ~.
sinca thav 40 accoon,;cas tho law
.s guaranty againet imnositio,
land frand reouires corroborntion
| but does the author furnish us wit,
lit? Mr.. Bailey saws that all endorse
ments OIL those vouchers and Ell
tries on Ore books inconsistent wit
his statement that he never receip
ed any compensation from the Wa
| ters- pierce OH CO. are iorgerles II
! liilS ne is coroooiated ny M. iie' &c
| ne ~ eSiuen' u lhe 'oiipanS .,
~ 'o,ii,Sor ''iV 80 H.. s, 80 e
- 'V''' 49, -, - +t.,,