Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1906-06-11
.mLDREN LFGITNII2ED.

porting educating aud caring FOR
them. but n the father was thus 20
1--we with. support. educate, and caro-
for the children II seemed harsh and
| unreasonable 90 exclude from This
relationship the mothers Of the child
rtn.
such arc some NJ the reasons assign
81 for tho lack ~ q public sentiment
20 uphold succcss'ui prosecution Tor
loiyeamous cobabi'ation after 1890. II
Is unnecessary 70 rccite others. for II
j. enough TO saw that whatever the
real reason or explanation may be, The
fact was that after 1890 Il became
practically Impossible 20 enfcr1" the
law against these ofen7os. except ia
f5grant cases
PROHIBITION OF POLYGAMT.
such was the situation when the
territory applied for admission {, the
Union and Congress passed the en-
hbluF 3c' Of July DO. 1884 by which
the people Of Utah, lu order o. cntltle
them tu admission into the Union on
terms prescribed by Congrcse. were
required to incorporate in their con-
tutution q proyi-o that 'poNgamy or
plural marriages are forever prohibit
,.iif D.. ,h'.-,eI h,. ,,,i,. ,,l,.,.s ,,otf.
,,,',,i,..,s m .'s.i.,,,,!,,. 49, tba,
TO- - d. -.,,,,0,, ,,,5t,.tsodiro
- g., -. ,',5 f-.,b ttot tbSrs
,-,r, n,, a,-,, -1 .o 80 ri,r,l
..,,ri1,... ,.5, ,,., ,,,o,cr,,,,,rs for
r..,..,',ons c,,,hi,.,inn hsd bec,rs
,a dlTiculi ,bs, ,bere Vas n practical
,,,s1.'r,I',, 't,t,,, "a ,,.t ,ir,, ,,.ss
tbo ogI,. c1 g soin,ton - ne ner-
ri,xirr ,-ot,lsr,
This s..,i,otl, has o,t orh over
since cort.,,.l5 iut ,yi,b The c1ogtap,
dtuintitjou ,f d.. rr,nt.r ~ ,.nl,ra-
,1"us fsnili,s .r3 I'm. ra,i5 srnroech
M thc f,n,e Who. ali viii bssi ra.eed
owa,. tbore bs. -c,ra 1sr1rsl
strsngthopirr Of .b. e.ru,,crt THE
,cstiro,v An This r.sre., ts .rt f1rth
st length IN The anus,.. .,ater,ert nm,
we MAKO rho foliowlrr 8uoiatious I'M
order that n may appear ig tbis 1Im-
mar, maj There is mis- common dis.
postiou. among nou-"Moim9ns' as
,.ci' as a,t,,,,,,,,, %
,,.r,r ,rl..rru,... .,rsr,,,g>.,.
Judge william Nclarlhy OF inc sue
'remD couri OF Utah, q nom mormon
ana au incorporating opponent ~
roNghm. wE" nas hftd Wahy ,mpoft-
ant Offices "l uust among DINERS lhat
~ assis tant lhHtd Sihles attorney Tor
IAN ana VINO as sucn' was charged
WIN me GUY oi Pt'secullhg 'heso
oiehfes' resumed - i"ii'Ns'
II prosecuted them (oheuscs "
p0Egamous cohabitationl before the
United States commissioners up un-
ul I,'', Mn,i' 'ne IIlll,u '.'.es ~
FOR services FOR mat Kind Of work. ana
then Quit and confined nv invos,iga-
'iops before the grand iurv I'm those
cases"
IN exclamation Of his action no les
uhcd--vc quote from the annexed
statement.
''rhat lc found 'he rress vas against
the prosecutions. that tho publlf pros.
ecutor whose attention he invited 10
the matter refused 10 proceed From
this and other facts which csmo 10
his knowledge. Judge Mccarthy reach.
cd thn conclusion that the publIc Sem.
men in their poIygamous relations
who had married before the NANTES
TO-
ID ,,pt-,,t5t QUO .rt....,,,,..>.,.
~ 10 A-' ''N
L. Il. Crliehlow. non Mormon
attorney az law oi Salt LAKE. CITY one
on me principal managers OF THIS proc
ceedins against MI smoot VINO gave
me case his personal attention ate
tending most az the mcetings o. CONF
nittee, testified before the committee,
again quoting from annexed state
ment
That after the manifesto NJ 1890
mere was no inclination ON The part
~ me prosecuting oHlcer 20 push
'hcs" matters az 10 present cohlblts-
,.,uid irrn,o5isic,, an. o"t'' H.. '' 1
VAS well known that Apoe.lr Jotr
Henry smith was living iu unlawful
,7hrbuatiou. that non. Mormous' gen
'mlly made no objection 90 u. that