davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
World's cresset. [volume] (JAH-ville [Colony], Fowler, Mo.) 1891-19??, 1906-03-29
Answer to Cues
ton No. 70.

Th,s! question like many othsn
that hav. stood in the CRESsET
for many weeks unanswered, Of
course come II them have been
strusk At, but missed and . long
ways of.
For no man can answer those
questions under the ono man
theory Bib,csly. "Sing o Barren
thou that didst MT Bear. God
in this Language commands some
character. or characters to sing.
Because the desolate hAs more
children than the married wife,
The Deselate, aid the married
wife are two different characters.
YOn ask who is the married. wife?
Going hack to (6sn. 2A2l-S53
Here is the first man and wife,
as presented by the word. And
yet it rs not the frat couple spoken
of in the word. The first couple
is spoken in (Gen. l-26-27) IN
this language.
q And God said. Let us make man In
our image. after oui likeness: and 10,
them have pominion over the fish Of
the sea. and over the fowl Of the air
and over the cn,tle. and over all the
earth. and over every creeping thing
that creepeth upon the earth.
Sc t'od created man limits own im,pe
in the image Of God created he him
male anddemoIe created he them. Gen
l-?8-27.'
Tho desceDdent &C this coupl,
is the character spoken Of Us thu
) desolate, having more children
} than the married wife, This PEG
pie was desolate of Salvation anC
and yet God had said to them, ''bt
} fruitful. multiply aud replenisl
the earth This is the peopl,
that bare many children YET
desola,e of Salvation unit, Chris
died and rose again. The married
couple lad this Salvation. Thu
Paul so plainly teach in thi
language
say then, Have thpy stumbled tina
they should fall? God forbid: but rattle
through their fa.l salvation rs come uni,
the Gcn,'lrs. for 10 provoke them !,
Jealousy. from. lid
In this scripture. is SO p'ainl,
, fought the truth as we have rra
+ sented them I. our readers. Il
conclusion We must saw to on
many readers that the DAYS aLt
. nights We spend ut our desk, i
. not to gain Notariety or honor o
, mon. But for the privilege o
, driving from the minds of thos,
who are seeking after ris hteious
ness. These dark clouds of super
lstition; places there by tho teach
, ings OF the one man theory.
World's cresset. [volume] (JAH-ville [Colony], Fowler, Mo.) 1891-19??, 1906-03-29
Ql Es llON No I

l'iO Garrett please tel us VIVA, God
meant, when he said ,hs, h. would snw
'>sA sSsxAEA1oE~sun4..xA-.apse.h~1psn
Judah with the seed Of man and the
seed VI beasts WIN nrinegar.
World's cresset. [volume] (JAH-ville [Colony], Fowler, Mo.) 1891-19??, 1906-03-29
HOUSE Moving

u yan want your hnuse moved
from one place to another; quick
aud good: Call on,
II. A. CARR,
Phlegeton, Mo-.
Who has had years IT exv~r,en,e and
who can not be surpassed for compile
meas.
FM reference. Mr.. Frank Nsukirh
aud The I'll. Of CRxss.r. Also In will
do your Stone work. auiI,iiny found
TONS. II, A. CARR,
-. PLl,ge,dn No.
World's cresset. [volume] (JAH-ville [Colony], Fowler, Mo.) 1891-19??, 1906-03-29
Question No, 4.

What II the valley II Baca and wha,
10 Bscs. Ed.
World's cresset. [volume] (JAH-ville [Colony], Fowler, Mo.) 1891-19??, 1906-03-29
CREATION
AND u
FORMATION


that We womb teke up TO nue OF
thought presented 70 10, In the
word; on the Two men theory,
Yet FRO. Perkins soy there 10 mol
such q thing in the Bible.
Yet We learn, that while Christ
was here on earth in speaking 10
the Mosaical Jews He said; :;
Do not think that will accuse you to
the Father: there 10 one that accnseth
you even Moses. 10 whom 70 trust.
For had 70 believed Moses 70 would
have believed me; for no wrote Of me.
But II ye believed no, his writings how
shall you believe my words: II John
5-45-N-E,
Christ would have them under
stanG that he would not be
their accuser. Moses would
dc that-That is, they were I'M
der the law, and that lie was
going 20 leave them under the
law. For Paul said.
For II they which are Of tho law be heirs
faith Is made void. and the promise made
VI none effect. Rom. Ala
Then you see why Christ said
Moses would be their accuser
and why He said that He would
not accuse Them. 1t ives for
J this reason that Paul said.
DO W. then make void the law through
iaithy God forbid. yea. We establish the
law. Rom. 3--1a.
F.; You can plainly SEE by this
language the Mosaical law was
not made void, or done away in
Christ; but kept in full force.
Hence. those of the law could
not be heirs, And for this rea
son, Paul said:
WHAT advantage then hath tho Jew
or what profit IL there Of circumcisiony
Much every way. chiefly because that
unto them were committed the oracle,
F, of God. Rom 3-I-2
by their circumcision they had
much the advan tage. And for
this reason Paul said again.
Seeing /, is one God. which shall just
~ the circumcision by faith. and uncir
cun,cision through faith. from. g. 30.
What II difference Paul makes
in the two people, he says th'
one shall be justified by faith Coy
Christi and the other one
through faith (throngh Christ.
>,,m" ~, way say; well he has
not sr1w" us, Tho those two peo
pie are yat? TherefWe We read
Il he ih' God of tho Jews onlyt ia h,
M, also of the Gen,ilrsr Yes, Of the Gen
tiles also; Rom. $50.
Yes, God Is a God Of the Gen
tiles. as well as'tle il of the Jews
But The above scripture shows
plainly the two men the same a.
this scripture
Now | SAY tina, Jesus Chris, WAS u mir
lister Ut the cii cu,hcisiun for the truth ~
God. 10 confirm the promise made un,,
the fathers.
And tina, the Gen,ilcs might II wif,
God for his mercy; Ms II is wri'ici.. FuI
tins cause vii. confess /" thee anon,
the Gentiirs and sing unto thy name.
Aud again h- saith, Il joicr, ,e Gen
tile, with spy oplc'
And sgnn. Prais" the lord. al y,
G"n,ilrs and laui him all 70 people.
R,m. Is IS . -10-ll
The man who would disput,
the difference there was betwee,
the jew and the Gentle; Ate
reading the scriptures, We have
quoted above, tl,cy would show
World's cresset. [volume] (JAH-ville [Colony], Fowler, Mo.) 1891-19??, 1906-03-29
Question No. 4,

Ed. CWxssEr Please tell ~ wha, the
seed Of man an,l the seed ~ .hensls are
that God II going to sew the house u.
lsrsel aud the house ~ Judah with?
--.Ianes Parkus.
World's cresset. [volume] (JAH-ville [Colony], Fowler, Mo.) 1891-19??, 1906-03-29
QUESTION No. 2.

Ed. a. there is so many that
think they know the scriptures
and ! thought by your permis-
sion | would ask the following
question.
QUESTION FOR MINISTER'S
TO ANSW Frs.
World's cresset. [volume] (JAH-ville [Colony], Fowler, Mo.) 1891-19??, 1906-03-29

I'd l6r a. s.li go, OF
- oi6iI!uk vt they are The Be.
lovsd II ~ fsther.
Nov troshsr Perkins, nor no
othSr man can TIL. under the one
ma,. theory Why God hsd Paul to
|uss snsh Language, without max.
Ing Hin ont . partial God. or }
God Who would b . Inspector Of
psrsons. Aud this would not
co-insids with their teachings Of
this present day. Yet sooner than
to own to the truth, they arr full
Of nothing. running over and are
sstis6ed with It. And they think
every body else ought to be:
Christ says,
tbs word that ! speak unto you.
they are spirit. and they are life. 81,
John e-03. ID
Life because He had TO give
them life, Not only did the Gen.
tile receive the benefit Of this life
that He granted to them, but the
ginning Jew that was dispersed q.
mons shem. ON account Of the
great SIN: They Received a great
benefit, aud this sin we have said
used them to he numbered with
them.D TN Christ.'s death and
resurrection this middle will was
torn down. aud Judgment brought
to the Gentiles for He was to he
their light, and the glory Of IT,
rael. AZ it reads:
A light 10 tighten the Cien,iles and thu
glory Of thy people lsssel. ct. Luke
2-82.,
The blinded Jew was also bene
fitted. from the fact that the,
were avsd by Him, from the cars
of that great sln. Rut whel
Jesus spaxe to them Of their blind
nessArd Of thy Judgment that HI
brought into the world to tn
Gentiles. some Of the blinde,
Pharisees that stnod by, said III
Ito Him.
And some of the rharisces which wer
with him heard these words, and sal
unto him. Are we blind alsoy
Jesus said unto them. II ye wer
blind. W should have no sin: hut no.
We SAY. We Gee. therefore your sin Il
muinclh. s.. John. 0.-i0-4i.
In this language there is expires
sed IL great fact. In the frs
place it proves that their eye
were blinded, aud that under thu
blindness they were oil right Ill
til they said they saw. Thl
expression brought them unde
condemnation; from the very fact
they said they SOW, wh-n they di
not SEQ. Those were some,of tn
) Jews that had the Inv Of Noses a
; their guide, and their eyes -wer
closed to Christ; their suppositio
WIS 10 doubt, that JESUS had rel
erencs to tho binding Of tn
natural eyes when lie suid.
) For Judgment l am come int
this world, that they who see ~
might see. and that they who Sc
might be made blind: Jesus d.
not r,cai, natural blindness ut al
H. spoke about u spirituu
World's cresset. [volume] (JAH-ville [Colony], Fowler, Mo.) 1891-19??, 1906-03-29

: spit4s thfg ss1la diaona sbsir;
nooksf that beont thsm. Ds-I
esass Christ 81. !.
Tkink sss thas - sens 70 Destroy
~ IN. q ne pgophsle; I = nes cons
y DESTROY. Sss " lal1l.
For verify J ~ sste Jon. I'm
bssysa ard sssts pass. oss jot o. 90
,ii,ls shall II 10 wise paas from ~ Nv.
III al BE- falAIlisd Matt s-i7-le.
Christ did not destroy the INV
but taught 10, that thsre WAS not
one jot or little 70 pass sway nm
I'll al was fulfilled: Hence. tht
Israelites the descepdents Of
the formed msn, when Christ
came here. and passed back into
glory; He left them under the
same law that they had been nm.
der from the time nosas gave It
to them from Mount Sinai. This
was prophesied Of before the adj
vent ct Christ. in this language !:
Thus saith the Lord God Behold l
will lit up mine hand 20 the Gentiles.
and 20, up my standard 10 the people;
and they shall, bring thy sons 10 their
arms, and thy daughters shall be carried
upon their shoulders, lisa. 9-2..
See Isaiah CO.'S. Also 62-2.
In lifting up his hand to the
Gentiles as above stated, God to
them fulfilled this scripture.
BEHOLD my servant. whom ~
hold mine elect, In whom my soul de.
lighte,b. I have put nv spirit npor
him; be shall bring forth Judgement Il
the Gen,ilts.
He shall not cry. nor lit up. MOI
cause his voice TO be heard IN the
street.
A bruised reed shall he not break
and the smoking tiox shall he no
anench: he shall bring forth judgmcn
unto truth.
lie sb oil not fail nor be discOuI aged
till he have set Judgment in the earth
and the isles shall wait for his law
lisa, 49-i-2-3-4
Judgment had to be brough
to the Gtn'iles AZ the first com
; ing of Chr ,t-,Jndgnent ut this
time was set in the earth. tn
isles had to wait for the law o
God. Hence. Mathew says.
That II milhi bc fuli led which wa.
spoken by E'saias the prophet saying:
Behold NV servan, whom | hav
chosen my beloved in whom my sol
Is we'll pleased will PIT my spirit uIo
him, and he shall shcw judgment /
Inv NeUtiISs' -
Aud in his name shall the Gentle
trust ST Matt, Ills "'2i
In this scripture We learn whel
it was, aud how it was, that Go,
brought light to the Gentiles
End low, and when, re set Judg
ment in the Garth, oy .brlngiu,
Judgment to the Gentihs.
The Gentlles sat in darkness
they were If The world, an,
light sprang up 10 them. Thos
that sat in the shadow of deaf
was tie Jews that had went gu
and mingled with the Gentiles,
1t may be- asked, did not tn
lsraelites belong to the world
, Well at this present age of nd
, vanceea human beings, they ar
counted as belonging tn tn
World's cresset. [volume] (JAH-ville [Colony], Fowler, Mo.) 1891-19??, 1906-03-29
NOTICE.,

Private Detective and Auction
Ger with Thirty years experience.
Terms reasonable. Satisfaction
guaranteed Address.
T. II. Mccall.
Fowler Mo
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1906-05-15
Assurances From Tillman.

members Of the Senate then occurred, the
press reports OF which indicated that there
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1906-05-15
LITTLE PROGRESS MADE
RATE BILL CONSIDERATION YES
TERDAY AFTERNOON.

The Senate remained in session yesterday
afternoon until $40 o'clock without the
adoption of a single amendment This was
accomplished either 10y direct vote or by
the process of laying on the table, and one
followed another in rapid succession.
Among the provisions thus adversely dis
posed of were several intended 10 fix the
liability of railroad companies for injury to
employees. The presentation of provisions
intended to accomplish this purpose had
the effect of bringing out practically au-
thoritatiye statement that the committee
on Interstate commerce will report the in
dependent House bill on that subject which
is now pending before it.
When the Senate adjourned the Sth sec
tion of the bill regulating the personnel of
the interstate commerce commission
under consideration and adjournment was
secured at a somewhat earlier hour than
usual IN the hope that there could be pre-
pared more acceptable provision covering
that subject than has heretofore been pre-
sented
Senator Lodge offered a substitute for the
pending section. providing for new COM
mission of nine members, one from each
of the judicial circuits, but indicated
Willingness to accept a modification, sug-
gested by Senator Bailey, requiring the Gre
alton of nine transportation districts with
one member from each of them.
An amendment which stipulated that
nothing In the rate bill Should deprive any
person from bringing suit In law or equity
In state or federal courts against common
carrier was offered by Senator Morgan.
1t was defeated on roll call % to A.
Senator LaFoiiette presented an amend
ment requiring all rostds carrying passen-
gers to install the blork system of signals
prior to July !. 1911. Opposition to the
amendment was voiced by Senator Nelson, I
after which 1t was defeated 56 TO 10
Mr.. LaFoilette offered amendment al
lowing injured employees of railroads TO
recover damages for injuries when the neg,
ligence OF the common carrier was greater
than that of the Injured employee The
amendment was voted down, % to &C.
Late in the day Senator GaiIinger took
the floor and said:
In view OF the fact that senators ger
less than half the pay that 1t is proposed
to give the interstate commerce cemrnis-
sioners, think we have earned our salaries
today and move I'd go into executive
session The motion was adopted ana
after q hve minute stission behind CLOSED
doors the Senate adjourned
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1906-05-15

was not an entire agreement among them.
Mr. Tillman, however. called to assure me
that the prospects of an agreement among
a large number of the democratic senator's
was good heard nothing further from
Senator Bailey until a later date. In
formed you of what occurred at the inter-
view between the two senators and me,
and you told me that you had been In
formed from various democratic sources
that agreement among the democrats
upon any amendment would be impossible.
The two senators called upon me again on
the 23d or oath of April. There was some
further talk about the form of the amend
ment. The suggestion was made that II
might be possible, after voting upon the
provision forbdding all interlocutory In
functions, to agree upon an amendment
which should include the Long amendment
and what has been known as the Overman
amendment.
II then said that In my opinion any
amendment drawn by any one representing
the executive branch of the government,
even though ii were inspired from heaven,
would not be accepted. without change, by
the Senate; that that attitude was natural
and proper, and that If the exact language
of an amendment which could be adopted
should be agreed upon. 1t ought to be drawn
by the senators themselves ! suggested
Senator Allison as proper person for fuR-
Their conference, and the matter. SO far as !
was concerned, ended there. / remember
hearing nothing more of 1t until ! was
just about taking the train for North Caro-
lima on May 4, when / was informed by
Mr.. Tillman and Mr.. Chandler that you had
approved another amendment known as the
Allison amendment. There was nothing In
the conversations between the senator's and
me which in any way bound you to any
particular amendment or In the slightest
degree impaired your liberty at any time to
acquiesce in any amendment which you
should deem expedient and in the public
interest,
Very respectfully,
WILLIAM H. MOODY.
Attorney General"
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1906-05-15

Affirming your belief in the wisdom of that
course, you then said that provision lin
ting the court review to the authority of
the commission and the constitutionality
OF Its acts and a provision limiting the
issuance of interlocutory injunctions, as far
as was constitutionally possible, would be
acceptable TO you. provided 1t was decided
not to try to pass the Hepburn bill sub
stantially unchanged, and you asked me
to meet the gentlemen named in confer
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1906-05-15
His First Political Victory.

This race was one of the most spectacular
and dramatic ever made in Tennessee. By
idicule anecdote and song Taylor virtually
drove his able opponent from the stump.
In 1886 the republicans of the state NOM
mated Alfred A. Taylor, "Boo's" brot er, TO
governor The democratic convention, held
later in the year, nominated Bob Taylor.
The war of the roses one of the most
picturesque campaigns in the annals of
American politics, followed. Bob" Taylor
was elected and reelected in 1888. though
he was opposed for denomination by some
of the strongest leaders in the state
The ex-governor retired from public life
In 1891, after the close of his second term.
and shortly afterward he went on the lee
ture platform, where for years he drew
large audiences.
Taylor was nominated for third term In
1896. and In the campaign on the money
Issue won by less than 1900 votes.
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1906-05-15

Long and Oyerman amendments, yet that
your amendment was entirely satisfactory.
Your amendment does not in the slightest
degree weaken or fn5ure the Hepburn Dill
L merely expresses what the, friends OF the
bill have always asserted was implied by
the terms of the bill. l may add, that my
own opinion that your amendment In no
way changed. whether by diminishing or
charging the scope of the court review
as provided In the original Hepburn DILL
is also the opinion of the Attorney General
of Mr. Root and OF Mr.. Taft Their JUG
ment Is that the amendment merely AVOIDS
the criticism that the Hepburn bill would
be constitutionally invalid in not expressly
providing the court review which its sup
porters have always contended was plainly
implied in the original language
THE original Hepburn bill stated that the
venue for certain actions was in certain
courts: the amendment states that THESE
courts shall have jurisdiction to consider
such actions. To my mind 1t seems oih-
cult to assert that this works any change
whatever in the principle of the bill.
"Yours sincerely.
THEODORE ROOSEVELT.
Hon William b. Allison,
United States Senate"
Attorney General Moody's Letter.
The Attorney Generals letter to the
President:
'.Offiee of the Attorney General.
Washington D. c., May IA, 1905.
My Dear Mr. President send, at your
request. an account of the conferences
which had by your direction with Sena-
tors Tillman and Bailey upon the subject
of the court review feature of the pending
rate legislation.
"On April IA you told me that Messrs.
Tiliman and Bailey had communicated with
you through a third person informing you
that they were willing to support an
amendment to the Hepburn bill which,
while expressly comforting jurisdiction upon
the courts to review the action of the COM
mission, should limit the review to the
two questions of the authority of the COM
mission and the constitutionality of its ac-
tion and include provision forbidding the
issuance of interlecutory injunctions. You
told NE that they Were not willing to con-
fer directly with You. but would meet me.
You asked II / thought that Congress
had the power to prohibit the issuance of
interiocutory injunctions by courts inferior
TO the Supreme Court and told you that
having read part only OF the debate upon
that question, the subject being new TO me
had not formed a final opinion. You then
asked me whether IL such a provision were
declared unconstitutional II would affect
other provisions OF the law. told you that
in my opinion it would NOT, as that pro-
vision would be easily separable from the
remainder Of the law Recalling the advice
which had the honor to offer to you, that
you should not at any stage become
finally committed beyond recall TO any form
OF language In any part Of the bill and
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1906-05-15

ter county, Tenn. He was graduated at
Pennington. N. j., and In 1878 he was ad-
mftted to the bar. His first successful race
fer Office was in 1878, when, at the early
age of twenty EIGHT, he overcame repub-
loan majority of 5000 in the first congress
sional district. defeating Col. A. H Petit
bone, one of the ablest republicans of that
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1906-05-15
AMBITION IS REALIZED
EX-Gov. TAYLOR ATTAINED HIS
LIES GREAT DESIRE.

Life's ambition realized describes very ac-
curately the effect of Saturdays senatorial
primary iii Tennessee. Ever since Robert
l.. Taylor made his first brilliant race for
public office twenty-eight years ago his
eyes have been fixed upon the Senate of the
United States. The great desire of his life
has been tc finish his career in the Senate.
Ever since Taylor retired from the office
of governor, after serving his second term.
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1906-05-15

M1G1e can tell you how to work up this
WV business, how develop it. WE ARE READY TO
COOPERATE WITH retailers from other cities in
building business of this character their giving them
the benefit of our experience in detail.
VISITORS will be received by the manager and his assistant
of whom responsible for the plans their application and the
and consequently give valuable information
and advice to those interested.
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1906-05-15
Conference with Democrats.


1.-THE conference was arranged by Mr..
Chandler and occurred on April Is. 1t was
full and free. 1t would be impossible to
state all that was said in conference of
two hours. but / think no false color IS
given to the conference by the following
statement:
II informed the gentleman of my belief
that you desired. If the scope of the court
review were to be expressed In the law at
all, that 1t would be limited to the two SUBJ
jects hereinbefore named: that in such case
the so-called Long amendment was accept
able to you; that you would be glad to see
a rigid limitation on the issuance of inter-
locutory injunctions If such limitations
were possible; and / stated further that
] would not assume to agree to any form
of language whatever for you, but would
submit any proposed amendment to you for
your consideration. l also stated my doubt
whether In any event 1t would be possible
to enact provision entirely forbidding In
teriocutory injunctions. ] found myself in
entire accord with Senator Bailey as to the
rules of constitutional law applicable to the
situation, with the exception of those re-
lating to the power OF Congress to forbid
all interiocutory injunctions, upon which 1
did not offer any final opinion, only saying
that MIR. Batley's argument needed answer.
An attempt was then made to adopt phrase
ology which would effect the intention OF
the two senators. | made some notes upon
this branch of the subject and at the close
of the interview said to Senator Bailey that
would put my understanding OF their
views upon the question of phraseology in
writing. send 1t to him, and. II 1t met with
his approval, submit 1t to you. This / did,
and on the next day sent the annexed mem-
orandum to Mr.. Bailey inciosed in a letter
which read as follows:
april TO- 1905.
My Dear Senator:
This rough draft is as I understood your sug
gestion OF yesterday. think 1t quite likely that
this draft might be bettered, but simply send II
. W. H. MOODY.
sIfou. Joseph w. Bailey
United States SENATE.
The draft referred to IS the one printed
In last SATURDAYS Record.
Assurance From TillmAn.
THE conference among the democratic