The Montgomery advertiser., 1906-04-20
WHAT HAS THE COMMISSION DONEp' FACTS
 MIR. COMER HAS NOT GIVEN, ARE HERE GIVEN

Epes. Ala Accommodations granted and complainant satisfied. Henderson & Cooper vs. Alabama | Great southern Railway.-Depot ac- ness done at Caldwell Ala, did not justify the erection of depot building l Carolina Portland Cement Co. vs. | Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. Rates 1 on liime from Hardyville and Siluria to ued until first Monday in November on | appear.
 w. W Lowery, ct aIs, vs. L. & N. | Atmore. Ala.-Improvcments asked for granted and cause dismissed.
 Richard Randolph ys. Alabama Car l cars. Petition denied under former ruling made December, 1902. 1 c. W. Pratt vs. Alabama Railroads Rates on cotton to cotton mills in l Alabama.--Fetition denied under opin- ion of July 5th. 1903 in case of Conner, White, ct als, vs. Louisville & Nash I B. F. Elmore and G. w. Taylor vs. Ala. Great Sou. and Sou. Ry.--Connec- | tion of passenger trains at York, Ala. l.rsyer of petition granted and connec-
  J. l.. Suttle vs. Alabama Car Service ssociation-Demurrage charges at Mo- | bile, Ala. Petition denied. No juris- | diction. s M. Morris vs. Alabama Car Service ociation.--Demu-ragr at Sheffield, Ala. Petition denied. No jurisdic- | tion.
 October 9th, 1903.
 l--Petition to prevent removal of sta | ton building at Ozark. Ala, from its present site. This cause dismissed with | leave to reinState at any time. | Oxford and Stroud vs Southern Rail- way Co.--Hay rates from Safford. Ala. Rate prayed for in petition granted and
 Shippers & Buyers. Nut. Aid Assn. | ys. Alabama Car Service Association | Claim for s4 demurrage damages. Pe- l tttion denied.
 November 2nd. 1908.
 Carolina and Portland Cement Co.,. vs. | Louisville & Nashville R. R.-Petition daway and Siluria to Birmingham, Ala. This cause was dismissed at request of | complainant.
 l F. F. Grotz and Co.,. vs. Alabama Car Mobile. Ala. The Commission dismiss ! ed this cause for reasons stated in let ter. to complainant June 10th. 1903. Air Eine aa Rs-cotton G rate es from onapSe iocal stations on Seaboard Air Line By. to Montgomery, Ala. Cotton rate from Pittsview, Ala, to Montgomery. 90 cents per bale, which was in the opin- ion of the Commission, a reasonable rate for distance hauled. This cause was dismissed. Opinion rendered)
 cotton fG0l in bales xs from Ala. to Mobile. Ala. Petition denied. A: s; o'Neal ct als vs. seaboard Air tiss hins RyTPetiton for reduction reduction o. on points on s. A. l.. Ry., to Montgomery, Ala. Rates declared unreasonable and reasonable rates fixed, to go into effect
 Keytone Lime Works vs L. & N. R. R. Co.-Petition for reduction in the rate rate on on steam coal from mines on Bloc vile, Ala. (opinion of commission.) ) It appearing to Commission that 60 cents per tor on coal Is given. to all lime works in Birmingham district and that said iate is reasonable. This lcause is dismissed.
 w. R. Collier. ct als vs. Frisco Sys- Ala. After a personal inspection of premises order made requiring erection
 c. s. Boles, Secretary, etc, vs Sea- board Air Line Railway-Raising rate on cotton seed in carload lots from To- cal points on s. A. L. Ky. to Montgom- which was satisfactory to complain Dec. 7th, 1903.
 H. A. skeggs. Mayor, vs. Southern | Decatur. Ala. Continued until first Monday in January. 1904.
 Prowell Hardware Co; vs; Alabama Charges at Birmingham, Ala.
 Griel Bros. Co. vs. Alabama Car Ser vice observation-disclosures at Mont gomery, Ala.
 Shippers and Buyers Mutual Aid As sociation vs Alabama Car Service As sociation.-(The above causes in which complaints are made against demurrage | q n1 In ri diction of the Commission having been entered and sustained).
 A. W. Rowland ct als vs. Alabama Great Southern Railway.-Depot facili- ties at Vances. Ala. Necessary facili- ties given and cause dismissed;
 Emil Alhricks vs. L. and N R. R seed meal from local points to Cullman, Ala. This cause was dismissed on mo- tion of complainant.
 local freight tariff on Chattaheochee and Gulf Division of Central of Georgia Railway.
 vile and Nashville Railroad.-Petition for reduction in passenger fare on Southern Alabama division of l.. and N R. R, Petition denied. topinion rem
 A. S. O'Neal ct als. vs. Seaboard Air Line Railway-Petition for reduction on Glasses 1, B, c. D, and F. Montgom- cry to Pittsview, Ala. Order made re- quiring reduction asked for.
 Jan. 4th, 1904.
 H. A. skeggs. Mayor, vs. Southern Railway.-Decatur depot. Continued at request of petitioners.
 Oxford X Stroud vs. Southern Rail way.-Depot for Catherine, Ala. Con- tinued.
 March 7th, 1904.
 Railroad Commission vs. l.. & N R. R., Southern Ky. and Mobile, Jack son & Kansas City Ry.-Erection of Union Depot for Mobile, Ala Con tinued for special session in Mobile Ala, to locate site upon which said depot should be erected. Meeting in Mobile held Thursday, the 17th day of | March, 1904.
 D. A. Walker, ct als. vs. Southern Ry,-Depot for Walker Springs, Ala