Bisbee daily review., 1906-07-22
AN ANALYSIS WITH EARNEST ENDEAvOR TO ASCERTAIN WHICH ROOSEVELT IS MEANT BY THE NEW REPUB-
 LIcAN SHIBB0lETH BY RICHARD L. METCALF.

for tag showing the date on which the product was canned and providing also that the expense be borne by the packers. the enc who wrote in such vigorous words to Chairman Wads- worth of the house committee. making it known that he would be satisfied with nothing other than measure giving relief? Or the one who tamely submitted when the bill was passed giving the packers the inspection which they really wanted-all at the expense of the government and faillns to require the date on the can; the one who. in the face of the defeat oI everything fc- which Senator beV- eridee pretended to stand with respect to the meat inspection law. sent MT. Beveridge the pen with which he nao arproyer the measure and with note ccngratulating the Indiana senator up on the great 'victory' he had won?
 By the one who talks about re- strainins the influence of the trusts In ; politics? Or the one who congratu- lated the people upon the election to the United States senate of Philander s. Knox, who was admittedly the choice of the Pennsylvania trusts and railroads?
 By the one who vigorously pro tested against the court review in the meat inspection bill? Or the one who ] consented to the court review in the railway rcre bill?
 By the one who prosecuted the famousN Northern Securities Merger i case. winning formal victory? Or the one who failed to take advantage i of the logical consequences of that vic tory and permitted the same old North ern Pacific monoDolists to continue to do business at the same old stand?
 By the one who insisted upon due recognition being given to the faith | ful soldiers and sailors? Or the one who systematically snubbed and sought to humiliate Dewey, Schley and Miles?
 By the one who professes devotion to American traditions. Or the one who violated American precedent by sending special envoy to the corona ton Of 2 king.
 By the one who insisted, as in the beef trust cases, that the men of flesh and blood, rather than the soulless cor porstions, be held amenable to the law? Or the one who. in the Paul Morton case. laid down the doctrine that the corporation. rather than the individual, should be held?
 By the one who insists upon the vigorous prosecution of all charged l with violating the anti-rebate law? Or the one who throws the protecting arm of his administration around a member of his cabinet when the trail leads indisputably in that direction?
 By the one who says that he means to send to prison those who violate the anti-rebate law, regardless of their DO, sition in life? Or the one whose pros cautions on this line have resulted in only fines to the corporation officers giving rebates, and to the packers ac cepting them. while the only jail cen. tehce imposed was upon the broker and his clerk who acted as the go between in the deal among these coa srirators against the law? .
 By the one who, in public speech and message. arraigns court for holding the corporation rather than the man UT the one whose course was so identi cal with that of the judge of the court he criticises that Messrs. Judsor and Harmon, special attorneys, em pioyed to map out course of pro cedure for the government, resigned in disgust?
 By the one who insists upon purity in the public service? Or the one whc permitted the mean spirited Loomis 10 continue in the diplomatic service after his irregularities had been ex posed, and then permitted him to re tire with honors?
 By the one who says that fideIir, on the part of public officials must be recognized? Or the one who dismisse, In disgrace the faithful Bowen. whose only offense was that he displayed hi. temper upon the discovery of the dis honest practices that had been carrief on Dy Loomis, the administration pet
 by the one who refused to giy. aid and encouragement 10 the Republi can machine in Philadelphia becaus, IL represented bossism. and all that i. degrading in municipal politics? O the one who permits 1t to becom, known that his sympathies are witt the Republican machine in Pennsylya mia in spite of the fact that that ma
 chine, under the guidance of Penrose Is so representative of degraded poll
 ties that the rank and file of Penn sylvania Republicans have reyolte
 and nominated an opposition ticket? By the one who professes hatre
 for bossism and machine politics? O , the one who sent his secretary of wa
 to Ohio to speak in behalf of the Bos Cox ticket in the campaign of 1905 , By the one who stands unrelentins
 ly for great reforms and uncomprC ? misingly against corporate denomins B tion? Or the one who, in the distr 2 bt ton of patronage in Wisconsin s turns his back upon LaFollette the R, ] publican reformer; the one who pc } mits his secretary of the treasury t g enter the Iowa campaign 10 protes - against the renomination of Governc j. Cummins, who is being fought by tn e corporations of the Hawkeye state F the one concerning whose own att l tude, in that clear cut fight betwee the corporations and the people, tn