The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1906-05-16
Da. CaApsGT FOUND GUILTY.
fgStHyfB ~ HfRFsf 'vD " y.
PTVBFD FROH HftftfRt
~ W. trpaH mefsHy hrfhuu . Hsy N
saafsesa teuft fHe . ~ : w Heii'
i've fNtt ~ nrHef 'HufHH HHr'
ttg.t fsH T%tsfffff " rfrHftHr tHws

N|NHHH WV N''
f.svsasse ST.. u W. HF
Sasf stes faft No. Hfe w tleartUH ,
rsspss, ,,t.y .I 10 tHtHH tuIraH -
tb,s iii, .p ,H8fass ~ .'. Uai hui
aully lfi nr. ai .H 'I rHN y
Pm Iha rIuiff4
H. .,i,t U.rrf fITf mrWtefs
n 4 puNsri. e. ~ Hl .t''r % q Wiff'st
agt tatU VU|. Inrff. ..finr n ttr0f ~
Tsrsusep fpl ..a MN f%tstunef Fftno''
q bUgbsm IaIitNt no t"ilnf ihft "
Cssgsay $50 ..t I.u, Il' lrr'fir"s ~ thr
tHsrrh
fha p I,tIa' s .ur .ru'sVrr ~ ~" ernft
THAT no ~..st.ir fett Do" niar"ndrd rom
esafealna fIH fuHiilfa ~ y miria''t ~
sbls rbufsG ip'u sr,h iuuH 10 h" shaN
ssf,aly tbr errlrsttatioHi authority ~ thA
dlaensa ihai hHa ls,Itrf sud i"nchira c%orfnftn
~ Inc ftatfiuS ~ frr ip~tlrs' t'rei and
Tho V.,gspr trrsi Il thIa rhufrh beth rrs
oeivel fho ea'no
s~ttsvrvrr. o ,,it, tho ~0'if' 80 strfess
Tho esfnrrt hops and dasiro that tho -
spoedee' may sa, he say clear during the
fblrty dnyt which, under Tho can"ns ~ ths
church, muat Intervene h"fnr" @rnteno~
can be pronounced, "a fully sa'isfy tho
srrls mat lctl authority ~ such conformity
on his part
1, wna announced on authority this after.
noon that ~. CraT sry will APPEAL 70 III"
court Of eviow Tho appeal will act aaa
stsy Of -rniance. The decision was made
public hy Chancellor Brown In tho ohce
n ia mes Brock Perkins, Dr. Crapsey'a
attorney. IN thta city. The accused clergy.
man was present when u was given out
hut had nothing TO cay in regard othe do
cision.
raitowi,s IA tho decIsion ~ the court
'
THE Courts flnhlnEs
D,uu. ~, vos,.rn
EcclesiastioaI 'our'' p.ot ~ 81
New York. In the matter ~ '"' nov
Ia. und.rs,snsd menber4 Of the Ecclo-
'ue ~ 49,. n. ,o,aor tina
e1as'lcaI court "i INN 80
following report and decision WIN resp y
10 the presehtnleht nlaue reuIuit' 20 puwo,,'
by the standing committee against the icy.
ngernon s. Crapsey' a prespyter Oh 'nS
DIOCESE; .h
The court duly convened at me parEn
house OF ~. James's Church IN Batavia,
N. Y, on Tuesday, April II, 1909 attended
by Stafford f.. North. counsellor at law,
who had been duly designated by Ine psnpP
TO act as assessor TO the court. Upon inc
application OF counsel tor the aCouseu al
adjournment was had until April IS, 1908.
Upon the last mentioned date. al parties
consenting thereto, the court c3nVeheu
In the court house In batavla' wnere "a.
subsequent proceedlngs were nau 10
standing committed was represented oy
John Lord OBrvan, John II. Stiness ana
Franklin ID. Locke, councillors at law Inc
accused appeared in person and by j. brech
Perkins and Edward NJ. Shepard, MS at.or-
new. The trial continued from Gay 10 Gay
until Saturday. April %, 1905, when the case
was submitted for final decision. The mem
bers OF the court again convened al the
parish house in Batavia MAY ., isoo, wnen,
after due deloerauon, tne loiow Suooenr.
whose names appear signed hereto:
Frst-St. Andrews Church IN the CITY
Of Rochester. is an organized parish churcn
OF the Diocese Of Western New YORK and
ut all the times hereinafter mentioned was;
a presbyter Of the Protestant Episcopal
Church in the Unlted STATES Oh hmeIlGa
and the rector OF the said 81. Ahore"
Church. ...
S~econd-That during the year 1915 saio
Rev. Algernon S. Crapsey. referred 70
in this decision as the respondent, caused
TO be published in book form, under the
title Religion and Politics. a series o.
sermons heretofore delivered by nun IN
his official capacity as the rector OF SAID st
Andrews Church, and said book was pup;
tished and caused to be sold and circuiated
by the said respondent.
Third-That contained IN SAID oooK ana
prepared as a part thereof by the said re-
spondent are the matters and statements
Get forth in said presentment and therein
appearing as quotations from said book,
numbered in fifteen separate, paragraphs
or extracts, all OF which SAID paragraphs
and extracts are correct and literal quota;
lions from the said books 30 prepared and
written by the respondent.
Fourth-That on or about December 81,
1905, the respondent delivered a sermon IN
the course Of which ne used ana employed IN
substance the language Imputed TO MN In
specification 2 of charge OF the present.
ment.
We make and find the following conclu,
lions with respect to the said matters and
things written and publshed oy sad re-
spondent, and we here set forth ior con-
venient reference that portion OF the pre-
sentiment referred, 70. and herein denomi,
mated doctrines denied, " being q part OF
specification 1, charge ], 1t BENG intended
by said language, words and terms 70 ex-
press the presbyters disoeliet IN and TO
impugn and to deny the following doc-
trines, to wit:
y. The doctrine that our LORD Jesus
Christ Is God, the Saviour OF me Worid' as
contained and enunciated IN the Apostles
: Creed and the Nicene Creed, and as set
forth, indicated and declared IN the BOOK
3 of Common Prayer OF the ProteStant EplS-