Omaha daily bee. (Omaha [Neb.]) 187?-1922, 1906-09-22

want Of proper proof of service Of notice;
Acme Harvester Company against Curlee,
sustained, motion to dismiss overruled;
Kafka, Administrative, against Union STOCK
Yards Company, motion of appellee 10 dis
miss oVerruled, appellant allowed fifteen
days TO file briefs: Meyer against Adams,
motion of appellant to vacate order OF al
flrmance continued, appellant allowed ten
Montgomery. suggestions OF diminution and
motion of appellant to supply record sus-
tanned; Barker against Montgomery, mo-
Minneapolis Threshing Machine Company
against Otis, motion OF appellants for an
order submitting cause under rule with
when reached in It's order: Flanagan
against Mathisen, motion of appellants 10
advance continued for want OF PROOF or
service Of notice; Brockman against Ost,
dick, motion Of appellee to dismiss appeal
overruled, appellant given leave to file
briefs within thirty days; Mcdonald against
jurisdiction and motion to quash appeal
sustained, appeal dismissed; Parker against
Parker, suggestion Of dminution and mo-
ton to supply record sustained; Mollering
against Kinneburg motion of appelles to
Quash bill of exceptions overruled; Dodge
County against Saunders County, motion Of
appellees to advance sustained appellees al
lowed thirty days to file briefs, appellants
allowed fifteen days to file reply briefs;
La Rue against Parmeie motion Of appel
liant to advance sustained: Palmer against
Van Auken. motion OF appellant to quash
bill of exceptions overruled; Palmer against
Van Auken, motion to appellee for leave to
file additional transcript sustained; Cush-
ing against Ackert, motion of appellee,
Bankers Surety company, to quash tran
script and dismiss proceedings overruled
without prejudice, questions reserved for
determination on ipal hearing; Colby
| against Foxworthy, motion of appellant to
advance sustained; Colby against Fox
costs overruled Colby against Foxworthy
suggestion of diminution OF record and mo-
s 0n of pRelsss to supply sustained
to quash bill Of exceptions overrued; State
| ex rel. Omaha Gas Company against With
nell, motion Of appellant to advance sus-
tanned: Terry against State, motion OF
| plaintiffs to advance sustained, plaintiffs
allowed ten days to file briefs. defendant
ten days to file reply briefs; Grimm against
Omaha Electric Light and Power Company,
motion OF appellant for leave to file petit
Non IN error continued to nnal hearing;
| ton of appellant to advance sustained /;
Myers Royal Spice Company against Girls
wolo. suggestion 81 ammunition of record
and appellants motion to supply sustained !;
Flanagan against Mathisan motion 10 re-
| vive sustained action revived in names OF
Anna n. Boyd and Margaret Boyd Clark
The following opinions were filed:
Lowe against Prospect Hill Cemetery As
ISOLATION; former Judgment adhered to;
firmed; Epperson c. Gordon Bros. against
WaEeman; affirmed; Albert. c. Marley
against Marley; reversed and remanded
with instructions to enter a decree in ac-
cordance with the prayer OF the petition;
Ames, c. Cleve against Chicago, Burling-
| ton Quincy Railroad Company; reversed
and remanded; Oldham, C. Starr against
Dow; reversed and remanded; Oldham, C.
Grinith against Griffith. affirmed; Epper-
son, c. Mirage Irrigation Company against
Sturgeon; affirmed; Oldham, G. Bice
against State; reversed and remanded
Barnes. j.. State ex rel Spencer Lens Com
pany against Searle; demurrer overruled.
writ allowed; per curtain.
Following are rulings on motions for re-
| hearing:
Getzschmann against Board OF County
commissioners; overruled. Nc creary against
| Creighton; Overruled. Martin again Il
Martin; oYerruled. Otto against Conroy
overruled. Thornhill against HargreaVes;
| overruled, Moore against Niece; over
ruled. Haddix against state; overruled.
Western Union Telegraph Company against
| Douglas County; overruled.