Mexico weekly ledger., 1906-01-11
AudrIan Circuit Court Docket,

cTbS. |
8 Maurice Reach by next friend vs.
| Wabash Railroad 90.
d P Moore, Administrator VS. )
| Il Jesse.
10 t Duncan, administrator VS.
Nut. Reserve Fund Life Assn.
II A L Detienne VS. f Q Waters and
] + CoontZ.
IL Minnie VII! VS. Wabash Rail-
road Co. -
10 P Fl Cullen VS. Insurance Co OF N
America.
THIRD DAY-wEDNEsDAY JAN. H.
IA Silas Mitchell Estate by Shan
non, Admr VS. Chicago & Alton Ry
Co.
Is J d Pratt ct al VS. Chicago 4
Alton Ry Co.
IS G NJ Haskell ct al VS.. In s. Mo
Riv Ry Co ct al.
II John Fox VS. La 4 Mo Riv Ry Co
ct al.
IS R E Hisey ct al VS. La & Mo Riv
Ry Co ct at.
10 Joseph Barth VS. Chicago & Al
ton Ry Co.
20 c r Lupton Furniture Co VS.
Chicago s. Alton Ry Co.
81 Ruth Lakenan-B Barnes VS. Chi
cago s. Alton BY Co.
FOURTH DAY-rHURsDAY, JAN 10.
% Willard Palmer VS. Chicago Il
Alton Ry Co.
% M Mason VS. Chicago s. Alton
Ry Co.
"a ] Fl Canada vs. Chicago g. Alton
Ry Co.
25 Robinson, Hulen s. Co VS. N $
Wilcox.
20 Sames s. Roberts VS. N S Will
cox.
FIFTH DAY-FRIDAY, JANUARY, le
81 u Bick VS. W P Carter ct al.
2S u Bick VS. NJ W Hodges.
29 Katherine Davis VS. st Louis &
Sub Ry Co ct al
30 Garrard Strobe, Curator VS. st
Louis Transit Co.
81 Jasper Willingham ct al VS. VIM
Mason ct al.
80 Jennie L Smith VS. James A
Smith.
| SIXTH DAY-sATURDAY, JANUARY, 20
80 Inhabitants Of Village of Rush
Hill VS. ] T Martin ct al, Applts.
"a Inhabitants OF Village of Rush
Hill VS. L L Lyme, App1t.
IS Inhabitants of Village Of Rush
Hill VS. W L Slater, App1t.
80 Inhabitants of Village OF Rush
Hill vs. Joseph Smith, App'lt.
81 Inhabitants OF Village OF Rush
Hill VS. Cain & Knoth.
3s Ella Fegan VS. J r Fegan.
SEVENTH DAY-MoNDAY JANUARY p.
80 Q G Thomas Mfg Co vsJ ] Nc
Gully.
40 City Of Mexico VS. B II Robinson.
App'lt.
Al B II Robinson VS. City of Mex
leo.
AZ Henry s Echart VS. G B Rollins
ct al.
43 Henry S Echart VS. Unknown
Heir Amos Ladd ct al.
A Henry S Echart VS. Catherine
Rockfork,
As Tina B Cook VS. L D Cook.
EIGHTH DAY-TUEsDAY, JAN. %, 1905
46 S M Locke VS. w N Reynolds ct
al
Al T ] Gatchell ct al VS. W W
W bite
As ] R Maxwell, Trustee VS. John
Boyd
40 o F Clark VS. Hattie Clark
SO Edgar Threlkelk VS. G H Drake
81 G L Ferris VS. ] o EdmonstoD,
Appellant
so Lula See VS. Luther See
NINTH DAY, WEDNESDAY, JAN. "a, 1906.
So G G Turner, Guardian VS. Dan
lei Hartley ct al
81 &C Turner, Guardian VS. Ed
ward Hartley ct al
IS Fred S Norris VS. Drake & Threl-
keld
SO in Rosser VS. Koch & Hide
brand
81 i'll Brininstool VS. E NJ Crooks
IS ] W Pratt, Jr VS. Mary Pratt
SO Ollie M Weber VS. August Weber
TENTH DAY, THURSDAY, JAN. Is, 1906.
so ] M Beagles VS. Geo Robertson
81 P H Cullen VS. Amer Ins Co of
Boston
50 PHI Cullen VS. erman-American
Ins Co
SO P II Cullen VS. Firemen's Ins Col
Of Newark, NJ
GA P Cullen VS. Fem Fire Ins Col
OF Penn
65 JF Llewellyn ct al VS. J ] Nc
Gully
ELEVENTH. DAY-FRIDAY JAN. 90, 1906. |
&c Eliza Rice VS. Inhabitants of
Village Of Farber
81 Killing Bros s. Co vs. S Phil.
lip
6S Richard Hanlon Millinery Co VS.
Hartford Fire ms Co
SO Charles Hardin McPlke VS. James
L McPike ct al
70 J L Brininstool VS. L NJ Smith
IL Jas l Matthews VS. Minnesota
Mutual Life Ins Co
TWELFTH DAY-sATURDAY, JAN, o.
Y Alexander Carter VS. Unknown
Heirs, sc Thos Kilgore, &c
70 Alexander Carter VS. Unknown
Heirs Jas Sims
"A Alexander Carter VS. Unknown
Heirs Chas W Bushey, sc
10 Alexander Carter VS. Unknown
Heirs Edward Hardesty ct al
70 II L Ahlfeldt VS. City OF Mexico.
II N Gross VS. Unknown Heirs
Jos Hepler ct al
THIRTEENTH DAY-MoNDAY, JAN. 20.
rs JP Crockett VS. Wabash Ry Col
and st Louis g. Han Ry
70 Edgar Wllburn VS. Wabash Ry
Co and St Louis & Han Ry
50 Lutte Diggs vs. Wabash Ry Co
81 Roy Clement by next friend VS.
Wabash Ry Co
81 Caleb J Boss VS. Fannie Boss