The Penn's Grove record., 1906-09-28
A PRACTICE.
Burning Of Paint Makes Insurance
Void,

VOID.
1t seems that considerable danger
to property exists in the practice of
burning off old paint before re-paint-
ing. The question has long been a
subject of debate in the technical
journals, and now house-hoIders and
the newspapers have begun to discuss
it. Those of us who, with trembling.
have watched the painters blow a
dery blast from their lamps against
our houses, and have looked SADLY at
the size of our painting bill because
OF the time wasted on this prelimin-
airy work, are interested in the in
vestigation by the Greenfield (Mass.)
Gazette and Courier, which gives
considerable space to the reasons for
he practice, questions it's necessity
n suggests ways to prevent the risk
OF burning down ones house in order
to get the old paint off. 1t says:
There is a good deal of discussion
among house-holders as to the desir-
ability in painting houses, of burning
on the old paint, a practice that has
grown very common of late in
Greenfield and elsewhere. Insurance
men are strongly opposed to this
method. 1t makes void insurance
policies for fires caused in this man
ner. Several houses in Greenfield
have gotten afire as the result of this
method, and in some places houses
have burned as a result.
1T is undoubtedly true that when
a house has been painted over and
over again there comes to be an ac-
emulation of paint in punches. If
new paint is put on top of these ac-
cumulations it is almost sure to blis-
ter. To burn it off is the quickest
and cheapest and perhaps the surest
method of getting rid of this old
paint"
The Gazette and Courier quotes
certain old patrons to the effect that
accumulations of paint are unneces-
sary. These old-timers lay the blame
partly on the painter who fails to
brush his paint in well, partly on the
custom of painting in damp weather
or not allowing sufficient time for
drying between coats, and partly to
the use of adulterated paints instead
of old-fashioned linseed oil and pure
white lead. The paper says:
Many of the older house-holders
say that if care is taken at all these
points, 1t is absolutely Unnecessary
to have paint burned off. They ad-
wise that people who have houses
painted should buy their own materi-
ais, and to have them put on by the
day, so as to be sure to get good lead
and oil. OF course the burning off
of paint greatly increases the cost
of the job"
The trouble house-holders every
where have with paint is pretty well
summed up by our contemporary, and
the causes are about the same every
where. By far the most frequent
cause of the necessity for the danger
u practice of burning old paint is
the use of poor material. The oil
should be pure linseed and the white
lead should be real white lead. The
latter is more often tempered with
than the oil. Earthly substances, and
pulverized rock and quartz, are fire.
quently used as cheapeners, to the
great detriment of the paint.
Painters rarely ~adulterate white
lead themselves and they very seldom
use ready prepared paints-the most
frequent causes of paint trouble. But
they do often buy adulterated white
lead because the property owner in
sists ON a low price and the painter
has to economic somewhere. The
suggestion is therefore a good one
th&t the property owner investigate
the subject a little, find out the name
of some reliable brand of white lead,
and see that the key is marked with
that brand.
The linseed oil is more difficult to
be sure of, as it is usually sold in
bulk when the quantity is small; but
reliable makers of linseed oil can be
learned on inquiry and, if your dealer
is reliable, you will get what you
want.
Pure white lead and linseed oil are
so necessary to good paint that the
little trouble necessary to get them
well repays the house owner in dol
lars and cents saved.