The times dispatch. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1903-1914, 1906-06-30

In order to maintain hts II con- pensation
at high mark, he neg elected his own
safety and chose to assume the risk, and
t Insa eonsequenees resulting from that act
fssas
reverted and the cause remanded for g
Brech Of g ontract.
IA In Southern Railway Company vs..
Forgeys and & Richard son, II from tho Cor
Court OF the city $of$ Brlsto the
SThis was & . 1 suit against the Norfolk
& Western Railway Company and the
Southern Raj way Company ,,S4S to recover
for? the alleged breach Of e. contract for
the transpcr ta ton of a! load OF horses
and mules from Mo isto Wtl. !EI e11n, 70
Norfolk, Va. 5 .55$i
The Supreme Court finds that tho lower
court erred In giving Rinstru ctions which
submitted Ito the Jury quest lions 3of8 negli-
gence mot alleged In the de- larati lon. and
also questions OF neg lgence as to Which
court cannot say that these Instructions
\ did not fleet the verdict Of the jury to-
the pref Gle OF / the Southern Railway
Company, a and for u the % errors III them
the q 1nust pc re-
IS The verde and 1ud gment was IN favor
Of the Norfo Tx and Western IN the court
below. and It is said that as neither the
pany make any obi ion \ to the verdict
ana H1udgmentsin that respect. as to the.
Norfolk and Western. It will be atflrmed.
s5 Set Aside c Conveyance. 4
The suit y Trustee 8, &c
aside q d yeyance Qf Q tract Il o &, lana
N e lia ad b essles aajudged Bankrupt
The conSeyance moved from Pierce: that
Laura Pierce was without means 70 pay
H. a la alton Scf insolvency had the
oonveyance made to his Wlf with intent
10 hinder, delay and defra I'd hls credl-E
tors and that ths yn, WSs
Judge yYhittle speak for the s y !,
G eismG dourt 81 i county uphoq-
ng the
contained in the answers that ga az IN IN
ducement TO his son 70 remain. IN a Viz Y
nla Instead q ssttlinf ~ the ,tS3es.
s sSyiea ) 81 ho aass1 ana 'ooatrlbnted
Suy1 Il ii \, purchase; the residue being
paid out of g, own n,fss9 shas
d deSte ahss e. 5'sihis
iect The property. was not contraote .un-ii
Till two Years after the date Of the con- /.
yeXan9sf u4ther ssia that the
hand 4 was Indebted at the date the con,
Syey ,r was made, and has wholly falled
u sesta blth tie scharge that u was mace
II h Il anticipation Of future indebted ness
and In fraud OF the sights f.of oredi tors;;
whose debts were not !, CONTRACTED ] untl4
nca riy 4 wo years after the deed was OK
iecuted and admitted to srecorr "a, "a ~ Ger
ttheso circumstances It is declared \ hat,
even liz the money paid by the Their vas
gaS loans to tho son and the latter supply
the residue OF tbs purchase money. the.
trans tion, at most, would amount only
to a voluntary settlement by the hus-S
band upon the Wife =. Us 53 3 Z III
n 8j5 93ss To Recover Debt. 8|5st
pa n, n from the circuit Court foi Giles
county, Iii Is held that the action brought
I wv j s Gibson n1cilvane and Hugh Mo-
silvane 10 recover debt q $4,000 due
them by the Portertleld Lumber Cons
parly, ana assumed by the grantees N
Successive conyeyanoesS Of the property
Of that company as q part Of the cons
sideration for the conyeyan ice, cannot be
maintained against theg defendant s sued
IN q court court OF law, but that their. remedy.
IL any, Is In a. court OF % uity, The Fjndg-
NEXT to that fleet, Irend cred In the Cir
cult Court Of Giles county 10 therefore
aHfHrrns>a, rs Judge Cardwell handed down