The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1906-06-05

thamfs eall str kiosnnv.
NE dhint haSe ~ Tho pfypoattlgs
~ fBahe the nutHF csnls difatfiF Nnu The
sp w., hsI e"shlns ~ a. wth Them ~
~ ssteuf ~ iatf ne atosry gFefad w ~
flHfuHHfF@ aalI NJ NfarNHV
W. NoeNeV then lai tahneid thfBdah .
HueH ~ letaminHflnn ~ ~ ~ H0n NiFfen
slFi HnglefsgawHns N the Hysflef ~ fha ~
%flrt9anf With iNlahuHfy eIhygfhiHe tha isil
letgian N lIs uulea .tanfeid admitted thHf
NJ hagt ~einaferef feighHHiy ~ ei#lfu ~.
flayt aHd Fllrfi mif w M IHynHrHf ~ " ~
fiah ahH ne arUHrtiinN N ~ ~ FFfe w
2 1nse avru W talfhHn'v y" 'snN"h' '"Na
tna fhs, se,iieweai ~ satisfactory w
yritg asHgsl W. WopHpy
sfa HHaNefpt taNneiH
fhRH haW ill VHn HHfne ~ rififn IN t1nf
1efeHrr ~ ssnfn herr NJ ihis aeiign VS.
lhia c,llee'lun eae. Fufih. oriy wv tnl
,ts' ~ = ,gr''"f ~ 'ar' tr'shdr'v "F"d
u foiuwed the tdvics ~ NV lawyers IN
ihgl. m9tlef said teuhsid
Vel yui hayent Hyep MIN ofedl' fnf
the ta.Hfn. mite, hHve yGfff
tshheld tried ~ etplain that though NJ.
HhFWef and tystnteffialW Nv tho atBt dtf not
arhnosletise that fiplshuN'y had paid NJ
the 81 pui mite vH1 he was pfrrHfedt N sfHni
ty shat he had aaii IN cptft hHntrlY thnt
telshunty had art and Nas rntltled ~
On, ~. TOR thu collection ~ the liNfWn
fsr VOW owc ~lplahunly anything fpf any
eervlces, N yIrf oninion'' sak~d W.
Moonet
4 don1 consider that I W. him anything
~ ~, replied Garfield
Speaking ~ tho drunken hid. story,
Canheld aid that be cUnsiderrd That VIC
worst story evrr told about him Ne said
that he vas not aware that Jeromc had been
the author " ,he plras' drunken hid
THfSKa DftAHrNtY AfvtsFb MAJ SAMMY
IN tho conclusion Of Mr. Mouney's cfoee-
examination Cahfrld maintained that In his
opinion Dclp hunty had advised him badly.
add that he could have saved n great deal
~ expense and trouble.
You didn't extaCt. said Mt Mooney,
that ths Downing bill would pass"
NO. air, and I think II u most ubiquitous
meaeiire. ~ any measure must be That ~
pointed nj one man"
But for II you would have stayed Tree,
wouldn't you"
Il think 80" answered Garfield.
And up TO the time Of the passing OF that
bill Mr., Delahunty had managed TO keep
you out 81 jail; In fact he had had your in
dictment dismissed. hadn't be''
Garfield ~acknowldged the truth of thla,
biting his nails meanwhile and rerHpirinR
freely.
lie denied that Delahunty had been n
charge Of any OF his property, and tried to
explain away his letters to Delahunty,
in which he spoke of vengeance, days OF
reckoning "relentless pursuit and @splen,
did SUCCESSES" expressions which he used
in his correspondence with Delahunty.
to the lawyer.
How about yonr prestigef' asked Mr'
Mooney. Garfield laughed out loud.
Because | have Used that word once or
twice in my letters" answered Garfield,
there seems to he a general idea that !
,n.A-N a-.aathin1 a~tFnn ordinary mr. Otlt OF
the way. As a matter Of fact, ] was very
slipshod, in some of my, correspondence,
not expecting that it would ever be produced
here in court
Garfield used the same excuse az his re-
ply to a large number of questions, put by
Mr.. Mooney, in which his written state
ments did not seem to gibe with his spoken
words.
HAS PAID s~TANcHFIELD l. HE EVER WILL.
Winding up his oross-examination Mr..
Mooney asked if IL was true that Garfield
had paid all his lawyers, save Delahunty.
Il believe it is said Garfield smiling,
Then what about Mr.. Philip Britt, who
is suing you for sl5, 600, in addition to a 5000
cash PAYMENT
Garfield acknowledged that such a suit
was still pending,
And have you paid Mr.. John B. tanch
field all that he demands?'
81 have paid him all that | ever SHALL
answered Garfield, grinning:
THAT'S all, " said Mr.. Delahunty.
Forbes j. Hennessey, formerly ar as
sociate OF Delahunty, took the stand after
ward to deny that he had ever advised Buck
lin to become a fugitive from justice. as
Bucklin testified.
EXPERT DISAGREE.
In the early morning session James w.
Osborne. who was in the District Attorneys
office during a considerable part OF the time
that the Garfield and Bucklin cases were
pending, testified as al expert that in his
opinion D~elahunty's services had been
worse than useless and that therefore
Garfield did not owe his lawyer a cent.
He thought Delahunty's advice bad from
the start.
In this respect Mr.. Osborne disagreed
with his father-in-law, Augustus Van
Wyck, who testified on Friday hat he
thought Delahunty's services were worth
from $40, 600 to $35 900.
REFORM PRODUCE MEN WIN.