The Breckenridge news., 1906-02-28
CIRCUIT COURT
PROCEEDINGS.


and on his m tion this cause was trans.
terred the Equity Docket, and reterr-
cd to the Master Commissioner for
settlement of tina administrator ac.
count.
A. A. Richardson VS. Daniel Hook
vc: On motion of the plaintiff his
case was continued and alias process
awarded.
Pete Sheeran Bro & Co., VS. VIM.
Downs; On motion of plaintiff dis.
missed without prejudice.
b. F. Beard q 20. VS. Arthur Good
man. Appeal taken by the defendant
of the court of Appeals.
Chas. Bianford adem vc va Kate
Adams vc. The demurrer to the petit
tion was overruled; the defendants,
Abram and Milton Dowell ere given
until March 25 to file amended answers
and the plaintiff has until April to
file reply to answer as amended.
Tpos. Blythe vs. Henry NJ. Jolly.
The parties having settled the contro-
versy herein the same was dismi ssed.
Irvington Milling TO. vs. R. s.
Bandy settled By the parties and dis
missed.
Town of Irvington VS. r. NJ. Jolly VS.
On motion of the plaintiff this action
was dismissed without prejudice.
Frank Fraize VS. VIM. Gilbert VIC
Submitted for judgement on briefs.
James r. Lambeth vs. Maggie E.
Lsndreth. Judgement for divorce.
John c. Chaney VS. Irwin West W
On motion of plaintiff continued
Bank of Hsrdinsburg vs. j. =. De-
Jernette Judgement fo- sale of mort
gage property.
b. r. Jones VS. Peter Snider. Judge
ment for sale of mortgsged property.
Mary j. Miller vs Breckenridge
Bank. Continued by consent of parties
r. L. Newsom VS. Rosa A. White
house The demurrer TO the petition
was overruiad, and the defendant
given 80 days within which to file ans
wer.
II. B. Suqus VS. j. l.. Ball: On
motion of the plaintiff, dismissed. with
out prejudice.
r. B. Tuttle vs. R. NJ. Jolly vc
On motion of the plaintiff, dismissed
without prejudice.
heo Sahll VS. John q. MsttingIy Con
tinued at defendants cost.
John w. Vest VIC vs Michael Tienry
Continued by consent the pleadings
TO be completed within 80 days.
G. s. Board 8 AdmI VS. Albert Bul
lock: Continued on motion of the
plaintiff and at her cost.
Henry Mattingly vc VS. Hilda Hem
ing vc: On motion of plaintiff the re-
turn on process is so uashed, and Den
ME Sheeran and Leo Jarboe are made
parties defendant, and continued.
Wm. H. WinebIinner Gdn VIC vs.
Jesse l.. Wineprinner vc: Report OF
distribution filed herein confirmed. and
cause stricken off docket.
G.. W. Jarboe vs Dr.. J.sB Frymire
Admr vc: Judgment against defen
dsnt as administrator for $s7.00.
Hilary McGary's heirs VS. J. Frank
NcGaIy: On morton of the plaintiff
is action was referred to the Master
Comm issioner, Lee Walls, Tor the pur
pose of restoring the last records.
The Miller cases were submitted on
a demurrer to the amended petitions
and on the dem 1rrers to the amended
petitions.
Eli II. Dean vs Employer s Liability
Insurance Corporation Ltd: Plaintiff
filed reply to answer of defendant, and
on motion of defendant this action Is
continued at the cost of defendant.
N. T. Mercer vs. Huston Alexander
Judgement for plaintiff for $4.4S and
the defendant RECEIVERS his costs expend
ed.
Dock Norton VS. II. 81. Norton vc.
Agreement of parties TO arbitrate filed
and continued.
F. p. Payne Admr. VIC VS. Harvey
Harris On motion of the plaintiff
his action is referred to the Master
Commissions Lee Walls, restore the
lost records herein.
Frank Fraize vs. Walter King: Or
motion OF the plaintiff, Frank p. Pay.
ne as appointed Special Commission
~ OF the court rent the land in contrc
Nv, for the year 1900.