The Lamar register., 1906-01-17
DUNNE IN DENVER
MAYOR OF CHICAGO TALKS ON
MUNICIPAL OWNERSHIP.
OU3 COUNTRY LAGS BEHIND
Tells What He Saw in europe-Things
Managed Better There-Descants
on the tyranny Of MonopoIies.

on the Tyranny of MonoPolies.
Mayor Edward +. Dunno of
Chicago arrived in Denver Thursday
and met cordial reception such as
has seldom been accorded to visiting
officials At night he addressed a
large audience at the Woman's Club,
the hall being crowded to its utmost
! capacity. His address was, in part, as
follows:
In the year 1900, while on "A visit
to Europe, / sent telegram from In
terlaken to Lucerne, in Switzerland. 1t
cost me somewhere about $ cents in
American money. I was astOunded at
the smallness of the charge. and upon
making inquiry discovered that the tel
egraph system of Switzerland was in
the hands of the government and oper-
ated by it. This started me upon n
train of thought and investigation. II
a publicly owned telegraph system in
Switzerland could be operated at such
prices, why should not the United
States ne able to do likewise?
Upon pursuing my investigations l
discovered that every civilized country
| upon earth except three, Honduras.
Costa Rica-if memory serves me
right-and the United States. owned
and operated their own telegraph sys-
tens. | further discovered that not
only We're the telegraph systems of the
world being operated as public utilities
in public hands, but that in many coun-
tries the railroads, street car systems,
electric light systems. gas systems. wa
ter systems and telephone systems
were being operated by the public, and
/ found that there was a reason why
| such utilities should be in public in
stead of private hands.
When one seeks to do business with
| his butcher, his grocer. his dry goods
/ merchant, his doctor, his lawyer or his
| plumber. he stands at arms length and
| has the right to make free and vol
untary contract. II the character of
the goods that he seeks to purchase is
not satisfactory or the price is unrea-
| sonable he may go elsewhere. He Is
not bound to deal with any one person
or corporation in the purchase of such
necessities of life. But when he comes
to utilize the telegraph. the telephone.
| the street car. the steam railway, or to
purchase gas or electric light he finds
himself deprived of the right of free
| contract. He must take such service
as is offered him and pay the price de-
manded.
If his gas is of deficient quality or
| the price is too high. he must either
pay his bill or have his meter jerked
out. If his telephone service is unsat-
isfactory or the price unreasonable he
must stand and deliver or have his
telephone wires cut. Ii he objects to
the service given him upon n street
car or the price charged he must either
pay or be thrown off. In other words
in dealing with public utility compa-
nies and in purchasing from them
| these lattcrday necessarics of life, he
| is deprived of the right of free con
tract and must take such service as is
| offered and pay the price demanded.
He is face to face with a monopoly
and individual protest or objection as
against such monopoly is absolutely
| unavailable.
These monopolies in privte hands
as most of them are in this country
are conducted for the private gain of
the stockholders. The aim of the man
agcment is 10 make money-to give as
| little eervice for as high price as can
| be exacted from the community. The
| very fact that in this country public
| utilities have been and still are in pri-
vate hands has given rise to serious
es-overcrowded street cars. un-
| clean street cars. irregular schedules
and deficient service.
In the case of gas. telephone and
electric light companies we have ex-
| cessive charges. unsatisfactory service
and insolence on the part of the Off.
GERS and agents of the companies when
| complaint Is made either as to price
or the character OF service.
This state of affairs has brought
about in many cities of the United
States a growing dissatisfaction on
the part OF the public, and this dis
| satisfaction has developed into an agi-
| tation in favor of the ownership and
operation of these utilities by the pub
| lie. That agitation has grown with
tremendous strength within the last
few years. and to-day. throughout the
cities of the United States. we are
face to face with the question as to
whether municipal ownership of public
utilities must be put into force to rem
edy the evils of private management.
Strange to say, this country, which
has been in the vanguard of progress
in all other matters. has been among
the last among the civilized countries
of the world to take up and seriously
discuss this question.
On February Is, 1901. as is shown by
the report of the American consul, 142
cities of Great Britain owned and OPP
Grated their own street car systems.
That number has been largely in
creased since then. and to-day there
are twentyfour more cities now con.
structing municipal street railways.
In Great Britain and Ireland 2S2 cities
now own and operate their own gas
works In the same countries 33i
cities and towns are operating their
own electric light systems. leaving
only 174 in that kingdom which are
privately owned. A great number of
British cities are owning and operating
their own telephone systems and
within the last few months the gov
ernment of Great Britain made large
appropriation for the taking over by
the general government of the tele-
nhnne systnms of the Kingdom.