The Washington herald., 1906-12-13
Equity Court No. 2.
Circuit Court No. 1
ICSTICE WRIGHT.


Wynkoop vs.. New York Jewel Filtration Co: YER
dict for plaintiff for SI000. Plaintiffs attorneys,
Douglass & Douglass and O.. L. Baker; defendant s
attorneys McCamm0n & Hayden
Harlan & HollingswoTth Co. vs District of Co
lunbia Judgment on verdict for plaintiff for s. 800
appeal noted Plaintiffs attorneys, McCammon &
Hayden; defendants attorneys. E H. Thomas and
H. T. Blair.
Foster vs.. Brown: sealed verdict ordered. Plain
tits arturnevs f. E Pratt and l. j. CostiEan; de
PENDANTS attorneys p. B. Dickey and John Ridout.
O'Neill vs. Ferrell: Judgment by default and Of
condemnation Plaintiffs attorneys, Crosthwaite &
Coliaday.
CoRsn Us. Phillips. continued for the term. Plain
tins attorney, L. G. Williamson; defendants at
torney, Malcolm Hufty.
Assignments for to-day;
No g.. Cole vs.. District Of Columbia. Attorneys.
Cuttings 6 Chamberlin-E. II. Thomas. Douglas &
Douglas and J. J. Darlington
No l47. Cumberland rs Brennan Construction
Company. Attorneys, Charles Lnkins and W. c.,
Clophaue-H Hamilton, Colbert & Hamilton.
No g. Won Dahlen vs. Elwood Attorneys. E. II.
Ihomas-Onarles Fox.
No l4s Hutchinson vs. District Of Columbia.
Attorneys, J. ID. Sulvan-E. j. Thomas.
No Ill Balderston vs. Wolf Attorneys. J. l.
Peyser. n J. Colbert. and Il. B. HamiltOn-R. L.
Montague.
No as. Falls vs.. GurIey ct al Attorneys, J. f.
Scaegs-W. J, Lambert and II. Z Davis
No Ct. Burton Us. Eluns. ATTORNEYS. George II
Calvert, jr.-A. 5. Worthington and c. J. Faulkner
Circuit Court No. 2.
JUSTICE ANDERSON.
Hepburn vs. District Of Columbia plaintiff files re-
mitiur Of 81 900 and judgment for plaintiff for 81 500
Plaintiffs attorneys f. f. CoIlsday and H. F.
Lerch: defendants attorney. r. T. Blair
Sayille rs. Cox; Judgment Of fat on sci. IA.
French vs.. Capital Traction Company: on trial
Plaintiffs attorney. Wilton J. Lambert defendant
attorneys, r. Ross Perry & Son.
Assignments for to-day:
No. q Bninard vs.. Albright Attorneys, P. A.
Bowen, IT.. and Gordon & Gor1on-W Worthington
Heald & Fraiey
No. q. Russell vs.. Washington Post Company
Attorneys, Wilson * Barksdale-Chapin Brown.
No. 60. Kane vs.. Dcvine- Attorneys. Bendheim
s. Rothschild and Burke-R. Ross Perry son.
No. l52. Kiston vs.. Carter Attorneys, L. H.
DaTid-Hsmit0n. Colbert * Hamilton.
No. Is. Ewing vs. Chase. Attorneys. X. r. Perry
& S0n-Witon J. Lambe1t
No. So. Scott HeTFel. Attorneys. Mackal &
Maedel-ITying Williamson and ". N. Williams.
No. s. Cross Us. Javins. Attorneys. ". L.
Lester-J F. Scaggs aud Thompson * Laskey.
Ne. y Totten Baltimore and Ohio Railroad
Company Attorneys. Thompson d Lsskty-Ham-
iton, Colbert & Hamilton.
No. S. Ransom Capital Traction Company.
Attorneys. F. W. Hsckett-R. r. Perry Son ani
e. T. Dunlop.
No. A. Totten vs. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad
Company. Attorneys. Thompson & Laskey-Ham-
ilton. Colbert & Hamilton.
No. 100. Nav vs. Metropolitan Railroad Company.
Attorneys, Taggsrt & Budlong-J- J. Darlington.
No. E9 TAYLOR vs.. Washington and Rockville
Railway Company. Attorneys. A. y. Bradley. J.
Darlington.
No I3L Richards IS Zuihorst Attorneys. W. c.
prentiss-Hsmilton Colbert & Hamilton.
No g. Wylie. Harker & Camp Company rs.
Riley. Attorneys, G. N. Brady-Douglas & Douglas.