The Birmingham age-herald. [volume] (Birmingham, Ala.) 1902-1950, 1906-01-23


The dockets in the city court for to-
day are as follows:
First division-W F. Jordan vs. Tom
Rensford s. Bro. william Alexander, pro
ami, vs. William Barnard; Stella Bennett
VS. the Birmingham Railway, Light and
Power company; Nelson Davidson VS.. the
Birmingham Railway, Light and Power
company; Moore & Handley Hardware
Co, vs. the Atlanta and Birmingham Air
Line Railroad company: II. w. Lantrip
VS., Bessemer Trust and Banking COM
pany; J. NJ. Pledger VS.. w. N. Griffin,
ct al; John T. Johnson vs.. the Wood
ward Iron company.
Second divisional. b. yandergrift &
Sons vs. the Alabama Great Southern
Railroad company; White & Howe vs..
Garnet Smelling and Development COM
pany; r. Z. Cowden vs.. Jess Smith, ct
AL: Underwriters Real Estate and Rent
al company VS.. Lewis Walton ]. c. Orr
VS.. w S. Littleheld, eft. al: c. e. Gram
dali VS.. ]. T. Ash, ct al; Miner & Ket-
tig Co. VS.. Ashby Brick company; Char
lie c. Wilson vs. the Birmingham Pow
der company; Charlie C. Wilson VS.. E.
l. DUPONT; Moody & Hay vs. rranK S.
White; Mary Martin VS.. the Southern
Railway company; e. p. Forbes Piano
company vs. j. N. Mcpherson, ct. al;
| Gray &c Dudley Hardware Co. VS.. j. r.
| Taylor
The case of John Glover VS.. the Bir-
mingham Railway. Light and over COM
panY is on trial in the circuit court, and
| mill h In cd
| mistrial was entered In the records
in the case of r. M Thomas VS.. M. N.
Due, ct al, the jury being unable to
reach a verdict.
The following is the jury selected to
serve in the circuit court during the
present week:
R. II. Adams j. c. Brasher, Levy Nc
Breyer, E. I. Chamblee, C. ]. Ludwig,
". 7. Terry, Walter Brantham, w. II.
Hit, M. Barnett, J. C. Marks, e. M.
Cornwell, l.. f. Clayton, j. M. Goouwin,
Robert Mckenzie. Biley Jones, r. b.
Rogers, w. r. Hide, John r. Perkins,
| T. l.. knight, N. b. Stacks, Peyton
Moore, w. s. Russell. J. P Salter, George
Cough.
The following cases are on the docket
in the circuit court for today:
Steiner Brothers VS.. p. g. Bowman;
e. w. Jones VS.. Birmingham Railway,
Light and Power Company; William c.
Atkinson, administrator VS.. the Kansas
City, Memphis and Birmingham Railroad
company; Danziz g. Eisenberg vs. c. Ack-
erman Timothy M. Hennessy VS.. the Bir-
n.
| pany
The st. Louis and San Francisco Rail
road company was made defendant in two
suits yesterday, aggregating $4,000. for
damages claimed because of collision
| at the Thirteenth street crossing, be-
| tween one of the trains of the defendant
| company. and q street car.
Martha Haggard, plaintiff in suit for
| $4,000 damages alleges that she was a
passenger in the street car at the time
| OF the collision. and was badly hurt and
mangled because of the negligence and
| carelessness OF the servants of defendant
| company. Her husband, George Hag-
gard, sues for 5000 damages, alleging
| shock and great mental suffering because
| The accident is alleged to have occurred
| December 90 1906
| Papers were filed in the probate court
| yesterday giving notice that the name of
the City Loan Office of Bessemer had
been changed to the Hines Supply COM
pany," and that the capital stock had
been Increased from 5000 to $1,000
| The following marriage licenses were
| issued at the probate court:
| Peter j. Conry and Miss Minnie C. Eel
| ter; Walter Mitchell and Miss Matte
| Sellers; Win II. Sproull and Miss Pattie
| Bennett; John Prdmore and Miss Annie
Bradley; George Roberts and Miss Alice
| Guthrie; Ed Lacey and Miss Dovie Har-
din A. Holloway and Mrs. s. M. Pearce.
OPEN SHOP IN EFFECT.
| Nn.&.1rk1ro na~Iarn Thau Laua OQ0n