Willmar tribune. [volume] (Willmar, Minn.) 1895-1931, 1906-01-24
@.. WIILMAR, WEDNESDAY JANUARY 24 1906

Arctanoer az minneapolis during the
past four years and who has assisted
j. M. Downs at this term of court
We believe this was his first appear
ance before the bar of his native coun-
ty. The jury rendered verdict for the
defendant. Judge Qvale was dis
pleased with the verdict, and on mo-
tion at once granted new trial. The
case will go'over to the next term, and
in the meantime Mr.. Thompson says
he will have sold and paid for the
shoes.
Felix Rothschild & Co. VS.. Samue1son &.
Thong thompson son and y ~ Ida Thompson. Jno. NJ.
plaintiffs; Charles Johnson for defendant.
Judgment entered for $5l9 81.
Biltrite NJ Manufacturing Company vs.. Sam
uelson &: Thompson. Jno. NJ. Downs and
Z Z; W: w. Stanford, attorneys for plaintiffs;
fendants.
Dismissed by plaintiff.
Richmond Hosiery Mills vs.. Samue1son 8.
Thompson and Ida Thompson. Ino. Nj.
Downs and r. w. Stanford ATTORNEYS for
plaintiffs; Charles Johnson and T. o. Gilbert
for defendants.
DISMISSED Dy plaintiff.
Cohen Bros. Company vs. samuelson &
Thompson Thong on and u Ida Thompson. Jno. NJ.
plaintiffs; Charles Johnson for defendants.
Judgment entered for $685.. IS.
Bruss & Fruehling vs.. Joseph Pulkrabek.
w. L. Everts for plaintiff and T. o. Gilbert
and M arch Bros. for defendant.
An appeal from Justice Abraham
sons court at Raymond. Continued.
W. F. stimson vs.. Frank Downs. r. o.
Gilbert for plaintiff; J: NJ. Downs and r. w.
Stanford for defendant.
Appeal from municipal court. TO be
tried by the Court.
Even Railson VS.: J. K. Fosse. G. H. Otter
ness moved to place ON calendar; Samuel
Porter for defendant.
An appeal from Justice Cramer's
court. Judgment for defendant on de-
fault of plaintiff to appear.
CRIMINAL CALENDAR.
State of Minnesota vs.. A. o. BRYANT Coun-
ty Attorney for plaintiff; Daily & Barnard for
defendant.
Dismissed.
County Attorney for plaintiff; Samuel Porter
for defendant.
Continued.
State Of Minnesota vs.. Carl A. Gustafson
County Attorney for plaintiff; Samuel Porter
for defend ant.
Continued.
City of Willmar VS.. B. F. Miller City At
torney for plaintiff Daily 8. Barnard for de-
fendant.
Continued.
City of Willmar ys: 4: Q. Bryant: City
defendant.
Continued.
ty Attorney for plaintiff; DAILY & Barnard
Continued.
ts Stats Of MINI Minnesota vs.: George Parkins.
son for defendant.
Continued. ~~.-:-t- ~,~-- :97-~-,s :97-~-,
State of Minnesota vs.. Frank C1eary.
County Attorney for plaintiff; M. w. Spicer
for defendant.
State of Minnesota vs.. Earl Robbins.
County Attorney tor plaintiff.
Pleaded guilty. Sentenced to thirty
days in jail. Stay of one year gran
ted.
State Of Minnesota VS.: Andrew Bomsta:
for defendant.
Motion by State to dismiss. Motion
argued and denied. Trial next week.
State of Minnesota vs.. Elmer Johnson.
County Attorney for plaintiff; Samuel Porter
for defendant.
To be tried next week.
State VS.. James Roach. (indictment.)
Trial set for Monday afternoon.
Grand larceny in the second degree.
Raymond saloon robbery case.
State VS.. E1ling Johnson. Gndictment.)
A case of assault upon the person
of L. F. Anderson, resulting in frac-
ture of an arm. Case set for Tuesday
noon.