The Fairmont West Virginian. (Fairmont, W. Va.) 1904-1914, 1906-04-16

a. r. Furbee appointed administra-
tor OF William T-Amos- deceased
H R Furbee appointed administra-
tor of the estates OF Sarah Price Ella
D. Hunsaker. Harrison Merrill. Jacob
Straight and Aza Beal, deceased.
Marriage Licenses
: Lawrence D. Matheny and Agnes
Bauah-
verololione Francisco and catarino
Chiodo.
D. F. darlington and E D. Miller
In the cause of Ella Rice ct al Is
e. n Arnett ct al answer OF the de-
PENDANTS TO the original ana amended
bills filed.
In the cause of E. G. Price VS.. Sa-
rah E. Mochler. cause reinstated and
James A. Meredith appointed special
commissioner
In the case of Delmar ON Compan:
VS.. Fred w Bartlett motion for neH
trial overru1ed-
In the condemnation proceedings of
the F.. NJ and P. R. R. CO. vs. u
S. Kendall and Harry Shaw ~ri-
of probation awarded plaintiff.
The case Of J. H Cafferty VS.. Buck
harmon Northern Railroad Company
was dismissed at che costs OF the plain
tin.
In the case of the South Penn Oil
Company VS.. Home Gas Company
plea of non assumpsit fled
Mrs. Daro Bell Mitchell appointed
guardian OF Cecilia Loretto and Or
ando Paul Mitchell. infants of Wm-
w. Mitchell. deceased. Bond given IL
the sum of three hundred dollars with
Mark Mitchell as surety
Exchange Bank Of Warrington vs.
NJ. A. Jolliff ct al: May rules. SHOW
alter and White counsel for plaintiffs
Deed dated May &c. 1908: e s.
Sturm ct uN- 20 ". w. Moore, 4.
acres - poles of land on TeTerbauSh;
excepting coal and mining rights
consideration. S1-42o.
Deed dated January -. 1906: a. w
Grove to Mary E. HiSss. lot in Mar
tin Addition. MononSah: considera-
ton. S615-
Deed dated March 1. 1906: Michael
Powell ct al TO W. H Sprass; '.lS
interest in lot in Brooks. Addition,
Fairmont. and l. interest in lot 21st
ward. PittSburS-
Deed dated April - 1906: Sidney
Remnant to Harry Tenant. 200
SQUARE feet of land in BarrackTiue:
consideration. $1,000.
Deed lated January >. 1905: Charles
/. Ice ct al. to J. ]. Gattian. lot No. >.
block 3. Walton avenue: cons.dera-
ton. s225-
Deed dated December 1G. 1905 {.
l. Michael ct al. toJ- J. Gattian- lots
!, and s. Peacock avenue: consider
alton. $500
Deed dated April II. 1906: A Vi.
Berns ct ux. to Anna c. Williams. lot
No. 10. block .. atson Addition No. /;
consideration. 500.
Bin of Sale
Bill of sale dated April IL, 1906: 2
NJ. Moran TO E. c. Moran. printing
press. type. typewriter. camera ard
badge press. consideration, 500
Marriage Licenses
George H Schofield and Ella NJ. Pat
mon.
H. B. Fletcher and Lille McWil-
liamS-
The case of the State vs.. William
Mercer was dismissed at the cost vi
the defendant
In the case of Charles J. McKair
VS. s. & O. R R Co.. trespass on the
case demurrer argued by counsel and
overuled to which the defendant eN-
cepts Thereupon the defendant for
plea says he is not guilty in manner
and form as the plaintiff against II
hath complained. and Of this he puts
himself upon the country and the
plaintiff doth the like Defendant
gwen leave to file special pleas
In the case of George Hickman vs.
T. n Parks. assumpsit. demurrer ov-
eruled- Defendant puts himself upon
the country and the plaintiff doth the
like.
In the case OF State vs. Joe koonard
mIsdemeanor. defndant pleaded gull.
ty and fined SO with costs OF prosecH-
ton.
In the case of the State VS. William
Payne. misdemeanor- defendant plead.
ed guilty and fined SIS with costs OF
prosecution
In the case of the State vs. Harry
Jones, misdemeanor. defendant plead
ed guilty and fined SIS with costs o!
prosecution
In the case OF State vs. Charles
Keene, the defendant was recognized
in the sum of 5000 with a NJ Berns
as surety Defendant fai1d to appear
and the forfeiture OF the recoSniZance
was noted of record and Scire facias
was awarded against Charles keene
and A NJ Berns and caDtaS was
awarded against Charles Eeeue-
In the csc OF the State VS.. Wood
Ashby. the defendant was recognized
in the sum OF S2Oo with Charles R
Davis as surety. Defendant failed to
appear and the forfeiture of recoG.
nizance noted Scire faciaS issued
against defendant and his surety and
4 capiaS awarded against the defend
ant.
In the case of State vs.. Fred Reed.
defendant was recognized with c. r
SnodSaSS as his surety Defendant