The Birmingham age-herald. [volume] (Birmingham, Ala.) 1902-1950, 1906-01-21

vent % the jury yesterday forenoon. No
Eerdict had been reached up to a late
hour last night. and the jury was locked
y and VIII make its report Monday morn
lng to the court
The following cases are on the docket
g the city court for Monday:
First Division-Phoenix Auction COM
rany vs.. the Citizens National bank ct
al; James W. spidie vs.. the Tennessee
Coal, Iron and Railroad company. NJ. NJ.
Boggan VS.. the Mutual Reserve Fund Life
association: James Smith vs.. the Birming-
ham Railway, Light and Power company;
". E. Jordan vs.. Tom Rensford & Bro;
Bailey Trlmble W. the Tennessee Coal,
Iron and Railroad company; John Cook
Us. the Avondale Cotton mills; e. r.
Green VS.. the Tennessee Coal, Iron and
Railroad company; Caruthers-Jones Shoe
company vs. Atlanta and Birmingham
Air Line Railroad company; j. w. Car
roll vs.. the Birmingham Railway, Light
and Power company.
Second Division-Willam c. Shackelford
vs. the Sloss-Sheffeld Steel and Iron COM
pany; Consolidated Electric company ct
al VS.. William H. Lane ct al; j. w Nc
CLAIM vs.. A. C. Nelson; S. F. Bowers &
Co. vs. l.. Walton; Abe Rich VS. the
Louisville and Nashville Railroad COM
pany; Ensley Land company vs.. the Shep-
ard Lumber company; North Birmingham
Building association VS.. 8. w. Smith ct
al; w. O. Hulett VS.. George p Thorn
] ton; Tom o. Smith, assignee and receiver,
vs. F. Brophy; Ward & Meredith VS.. M.
Casey G. Co. Erie Lumber company VS..
Wood Dickerson company Bank of Ems
ley ct al VS. Moore & Co, defendants,
and mayor and city council OF Ensley,
garnishees; I. H. Friel ct al. VS.. town of
North Birmingham; George f. Daniels VS..
| j. w. Dixon & Co.; Norman Webb ct al.
VS.. sioss- Sheffield Steel and Iron COM
! pany
The following new suits we're filed In
| the city court yesterday:
James Geter vs.. the Louisville and
Nashville Railroad company. The petit
tloner alleges that he was in the employ
| of the defendant company October 10,
! 1906, and was at work cleaning out the
I ash pan of locomotive when ne was
severely and painfully burned by an es-
cape Of steam or hot water. He prays
for damages to the extent of 1888
r. II. Stokes VS.. the Western Union
Telegraph company, damages to the ex-
tent of s1e99, for non-deliYery OF tele-
! gram.
Mrs. c. C. McCaskin VS.. the Western
Union Telegraph company, damages to
tile extent OF $780, for non-deliyery OK
telegram.
Margaret Louise Thompson by her next
I friend W. r. Thompson, VS. Albert Fans
! nacht and W. f. Schlichter, partners.
damages to the extent OF S1909, for Injuries
caused by servant allowing guam
tity of hot liquid to fall upon minor plain
| tiff.
w r.. Thompson VS.. albert Fansnacht
| and w. It. Schlichter damages to the ex-
| tent of $500 for mental suffering and loss
! of society and service of wife and child
because of burning With hot liquid
| George Sanders VS.. the Tennessee Coal
, Iron and Railroad company, damages
| to the extent Of 1899 for being injured by
the falling In of part of the roof or
| top of mine No. 4 near Wylam.
The following business was transacted
I'm the chancery court yesterday:
Mamie f. McWhorter VS.. r. l.. Me-
Whorter, submitted on motions to dis
miss.
d. w. Graybill VS.. d. M. Drennen ct al,
submitted ON a motion to dismiss.
Bessemer Trust and Banking company
VS.. Annie G.. Hard ct al, submitted on a
demurrer.
Robert e. Boyle VS.. A. n. Hamaker.
submitted for a decree.
Birmingham Realty company VS.. the
mayor and aldermen OF birmingham, sub
mitted for decree on motion to dis
miss.
Licenses to marry were issued TO the
following persons yesterday in the pro-
| bate court:
Jesse Hundley and Miss Frances Thorn;
| Il. f. Fuller and Miss TOME Knight.