The Birmingham age-herald. [volume] (Birmingham, Ala.) 1902-1950, 1906-03-16
RECORD OF COURTS

An unusually small amount OF business
was transacted in the court house yes
terday. none Of the courts being par
ticularly busy.
There was no session Of the city court
in either division; the iuries having been
discharged from service.
Further improvement was reported in
the condition of Judge Dan A. Greene,
of the criminal court
The case of A. o. May, charged with
taking possession of property under
lien than was void and Illegal, was called
for trial, but the matter was quickly de-
, cded in favor of the defendant. when
| the lien In question was offered as EVIL
| denoe it being shown concusively on the
face of the document that. there was no
violation of the law in the matter.
The following business was transacted
in the circuit court yesterday:
L. B. Bruce VS.. the Birmingham Rail-
way. Light and Power company; jury
and verdict for the plaintiff for 500.
e. A. Morris VS.. the Miller Real Estate
and Brokerage company; non-suit taken
by the plaintiff
Mrs Nellie Reed VS.. the Southern Rail-
way company on trial
Papers declaratory of his intention to
become a naturalized citizen of the United
States were taken out by ]. Cander at
the circuit court Yesterday
Clerk and Register Gillespy of the city
court, yesterday took out a reference
in the case of W. II. Gibson VS.. Fletcher
Ware, receiver for the purpose of determ-
ming If the court should order the pay
ment of a claim for services rendered
by A. Cooper to the Ayondale Laundry
before 1t went into the hands of a re-
ceiver.
The following new suits were filed in
the city court yesterday:
Clara Brown vs. the Birmingham Rail-
way, Light and Power company The
plaintiff sues for damages in the sum of
$1,000. alleging that she was thrown out of
buggy and seriously and painfully in
jured because of a collision at the inter-
section of Third avenue and Twenty
second street February 5, 1906.
Alice williams VS.. the Birmingham
Railway, Light and Power company. The
plaintiff alleges that she was injured in
the same accident mentioned in the suit
described above. and prays for damages
in the sum OF $1,000.
In the chancery court yesterday Cham
cellor Benners issued an order requiring
further testimony to be taken in the
cause OF l.. p. Bradley, assignee, VS.. ]. {
e. Mnter
Licenses to marry were issued in the
probate court yesterday to the following
persons:
Arch Nabors and Miss Ella Johnson
James Caps and Miss Ada Powell. S. NJ.
Brown and Mrs. Hette Howard.
The following cases are on the docket
of the chaneery court for trial today:
Andrew J. Mothershed vs.. Mary e.
Mothershed; Central Trust company vs..
S. II. Hill, ct al; Litteton II. Bennett
VS. Pinkey Bennett, ct al; d. NJ. Dren-
men. ct al, VS.. William II. Lane; Mike
McCarty vs. Sarah Jones, ct al; William
Richardson VS.. Marie Richardson, alias
Marie Francis
The following cases are on the docket OF
the circuit court for trial today:
John Lekas VS.. Star Candy company.
ct al; Charles W. STREET. VS.. Peoples
Home Telephone company; Eel Dorado
Jewelry company vs. 7. w Walker. ct
al: Doe tx Dem Tennessee Coal. Iron
and Railroad company VS.. Warrior River
Coal and Land company. ct al; Stedman
Hosey administrators VS.. Bessemer Ma
chine and Foundry company.