Rock Island Argus. (Rock Island, Ill.) 1893-1920, 1906-11-29
ABOUT THE COURT HOUSE.
COUNTY COURT.

Rock Island county court, Juoge II.
E. Parmenter presiding.
The following orders have been made
by Judge Gest in the circuit court:
LAW.
Blake & Murphy VS.. Murphy. AS
sumpsit. Cause of action settled. Dis
missed at plaintiffs cost. Judgment
against plaintiff for costs and eXecu-
ton.
Kay VS.. Stisser. Assumpsit. Dis
missed for want of prosecution. Judg-
ment against plaintiff for costs and en-
ecution.
Anderson VS.. Gilmore. Case. Cause
reached for trial. plaintiff and his coun-
sci called and defaulted. Suit dismiss
ed for want of prosecution.
Zeffran VS. Christisen. Case. Dis
missed by pIaintiff. Judgment against
plaintiff for costs and execution.
Craig VS.. Pettifer, ct al. Debt. Cause
reached for trial in it's regular order
Plaintiff and his counsel called to pros
ecute and defaulted and suit dismissed
Judgment against plaintiff for costs
and execution.
Weaver VS.. Swenssen. Appeal by de-
PENDANT Cause reached for trial in its
regular order. Plaintiff called to pros
ecute and defaulted for want of ap-
pearance and suit dismissed for want
of prosecution.
Weaver, by next friend, VS.. Swens-
sen. Appeal by defendant. Cause
reached for trial in it's regular order.
Plaintiff and his next friend called TO
pearance and suit dismissed for want
of prosecution. Judgment against plain
tiff for costs.
Lame VS.. Swenssen. Appeal by de-
PENDANT. Cause reached for trial in it's
regular order. Plaintiff called to pros
ecute and defaulted. Suit dismissed
for want of prosecution. Judgment
against plaintiff for costs and execu-
ton.
Cleary VS.. Deere & Co., ct al Case.
Cause reached for trial in its regular
order. Suit dismissed for want of pros
ecutiOn. Judgment against plaintiff for
costs and execution. Plaintiff prays
an appeal to the appellate court, Sec
ond district; allowed on plaintiff filing
bond in the sum of $3.50 with sureties
to be approved by the clerk Bond to
be filed in 80 days. Bill of exceptions
in 80 days.
Olson VS.. Loosely Case. Plaintiff
and her counsel called to prosecute;
cause being reached for trial in its
regular order. and defaulted for want
of appearance. Suit dismissed for
want of prosecution. Judgment against
plaintiff for costs and execution.
SOderberg VS.. Arndt. Appeal by de-
PENDANT. Cause reached for trial in it's
regular order. Plaintiff called to pros
ecute and defaulted for non-appear-
ance. Suit dismissed for want of pros
ecution. Judgment against plaintiff for
costs and execution.
Same VS.. same. Appeal by defend
ant. Same order as in above.
Silverman VS.. Boggess. Appeal by
defendant. Jury sworn; trial proceeds
Jury instructed to find the issues for
plaintiff and assess his damages at
$1I13. Jury returns its verdict finding
issues for plaintiff and assessing his
damages at $17.13. Judgment on YER
dict for that amount and costs and ex-
ecution.
Danlin VS.. Swenssen. Appeal by de-
PENDANT. Cause reached for trial in it's
regular order. Plaintiff called to prose-
cute and defaulted for want of appear
ance. Suit dismissed for want of pros
ecution. Judgment against plaintiff for
costs and execution
Larkin VS.. city of Rock Island Case
Jury sworn; trial proceeds. Jury in
structed TO retire with an officer to
consider of a verdict Jury returns it's
verdict into court finding defendant
guilty and assessing plaintiffs dam
ages at $4,000.
Swenssen VS.. Flick & Johnson Con-
struction company. Trespass. Contin-
ued with alias summons.
Fries VS.. same. Case. Same order
as in above.
Harms VS.. c.. B. & @. Railway COM
pany. Case. Motion by plaintiff for
continuance. Motion allowed and cause