The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1906-06-01
CANFIELD GOING TO TESTIFY.
Continued from First Page.

Continued from First Page.
the value Of the services. and to SHOW NAV
they were such a. any Ordinary lawyer
could have rendered for a small sum Inc
repetition of this got on Delahuntvs nerves
and he exclaiu ed orce:
81 consider that the services | rendered
Garfield when I had been deserted by both
NV clients. Garfield gone to Europe Tor ms
health and Bucklin fleeing IN lear TO Cahsda'
were of inestimable value. 1 know OF no
other Layyer in New York that would nave
done them at the time, and Of few who could.
| NV personal friendship for Garfield, lasting
over many wears, was the great ~instiRatlng
motive of my work. But | expected to be
paid for it,"
6eIJ a1narentIy from The District Attorney,
hut he re iected them all. till the last, which
he accented when Delahunty had been
fired" According to Delahunty, the gam
bier was enraged and insisted on a hght
to q finish.
LETTERS CT DEL.AHUSTY NOW.
To of set this and show that Delahunty
vas really the instigator of the strenuous
legal resistance. with a view 60 running up
Zig bills against Garfield, Mr., Marshall Pnt
several letters from Delahunty to Canilelu
in evidence. One OF these, dated March
81, 1908. refers to Supreme Court Jus''oo
Scott as a Jerome supporter. IL reaos' D
DEAR DICK. maven NilNNeh '
heretofore because events have been so
numerous and 80 near each other that l."
keen vou posted should have 10 write every
dav Dawes case is now waiting Judge
NcCall's decision on the change oil venue
Everything possible hns been done every
body contented, and the best arran Eei'ehts
nosssible made in anticipation OF a iaNoraole
decision. Meanwhile, of course jerome ca"
do nothing.
I am irving TO arrange for YOU to come
back in May, but am as yet unable to advise
you about it, Probably next Week , sm ma
lew isohn decision does not bar people from
testifyinR against you. but merely excuses
them from doing SO IL they O want ho TO t tnst Acc ied
vantage Of IL. Some OF thein nave ''"'
against you and may do so again, =
eH ence il is important to &c; for YOU, TOE. a
e GapTs ss OF PsacGif IN IN o SHH faS Sf'E't viii ii h;oIp greatly
before a Judge who. IKE Scott Is o xpsnII
hhs a UUerseouting' This is the reason of my
ina hn bilinty to say when YOU should return; t.
much uefo, Weaker than that against Dave, and
the case for a change OF venue iorc Gon c ~
much stronger than Dave j.: nov mnossiihle Tor
MSCa al cat 9e 3 pnif trial PHiSl here. e"SeTrybSSdY knows
that but we have. nowithstandIoG' TO get an
unbiased mi aSofI i lInns w Ss,Dr SUCH E" a one Is SITTING,
or about to sit. you can come Cba Eyer Ipe.nnnne'
give hail and move Tor n Change OF VENUE
Sou will then be free to attend 10 your sum
mer business. Yours. very sincerely,
"et u''" joins DEIAHrNrY.
WAS USUALLY IN DEBT TO CANF1ELp. =.
Mr.. Marshall got Delahnnty to admit !
that he had been in the habit OF oorhoTan9
ALWAYS owed the gambler more money
than any services no had rendered were
worth, before the raid: ,..a,ood
To show this Mr.. Marshall introduced
a couple of letters fro m Garfield. bateo
October 81 and 20, 1901. The first negins'
DEAn DICE: 1t seems kind of unETaciou,
IN send YOU a hill after our conversation th'
other evening in regardto the interest on th'
notes. = You will remember lhe las
hin I sent YOU was In January, 1900.
O~n.January l.. 1900. l made out one OF thes'
bills. as you will see, but did not send IT, In
amount of these bills and the disbursement
are as follows:
Hough Cases ..':.. oo6 .
BUl OF January :, 1000. -, :,..,......,'' Soo q
Xiii for 1900 and 1901 and disbursements -, So2s
IL would oblige me very much, II you "ou'