Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1906-06-20

in the community and " higher grade
than the men who compose the coun-
cll They should be business men OF
ability with the interests Of the tax
payers az heart, and they are set as
check on the council.
Hobday-Has the board the right 10
readvertiso again and again and then
report 10 the councIl3
plninny my .iea OF o. There
was case iu this state where the
council instructed the water works
committee 90 DO some work that
should have been done under the
board. An Injunction was sought and
Judge HiIes decided 10 iu the district
court. IL went tp the supreme court
and the higher court held that The
councils action WAS an interference
with the board OF public works. There
was another case and peculiarly
enough This was entitled Moran vs..
Thompson The contract 1e made by
the board and submitted 90 the coun-
cil was changed, and thc supreme court
held that the council bad nu right 90
interfere with The bushes, OF the board
~ The public works.
WHO PAYS THE BILL?
Do you contend that the board has
the right To- go ahead and incur exc
pcnsc without authority from the
council They have the right Go zee
iect hide. bur they have mo- right 90
Ieadycruse They cam open bids Un
july e ANA so ON Indefinitely until thel
bankrupt salt Lake CITY and The State
Of ttah. your opinion ls thlt they
may 60 ON indefinitely Who Is going
To- pay The common gioiier. as you
say, VIII have To pay. ] MINK YOU iIs
ln error am hshllhs l"f N'''h9
South street why was ihat turned
down Unless me y'u'cA oIN'i. " I'-
adNtrlisement VIII never N'I+ i' pay
me bi'ls. u ! nave 'o say lu-,he Ir','-
ttnllaI} an my ili'. IfIesp,...'. OF ''.'
opinion OF the hss'St."' guy ..l''I,l.
rs tneIe any fe1s"l,' N'. Nu.N'-s' ''l
We second 9luln .,I'e' CONTRACT
should not nave u'tN i' ,....,..
h'ohl'sg s"'''l nav ''"
Mulyey-D,I you '"'e B" ''''' ''
Se,oHn Sou''' o., ~, u.,,.... ...s
hyuh''.s ..' ,''' i''''', '' 80.
Ho''l 'v' ", guy ..,'. ~.
t,.. '''.'' '''' '''''
D'1s "''' '' "'e"
BIDS WILL NOT BE LOWER.
,..,.,. .,....,.-,.u.. MI.
had ben persistent rlmors that the
ne" n'a' |gl,4 De ulle, we .,,, nS' %
".u o4'' '.l 'o' Kay '.,.''" wy
li'S,.. V'',s '. W. ,N' a. -..,, -,
,"S'''' 'ou '"''N '''' '''' '''
oe '' 10" 's'''" .s., 49,. r.
ftI! az" you S"is'.'u 'l''' '''
ogsI9 .'.f' ~" Iy"'l .,....t..
NuoA"'s -'>"' "S w ''' '''N' 81 '''e
H,n| H.. H.
D'1 gay as '"' ''"' "''''' '''
Ieytclnk 'H' 'iIs
hooh can answer 'Ha,'
DAVIS "il ask 'As same Puesuon
oi me 'la.. man. Mi' Le'li'Il Do ,.,,...,.
LtoniId-l Niil answer YOU u assn
the CLERK ,o read section l' Jul lie
o. .c.H''lons.
Mole''N-'Rtading nom spe'lilea
tilus-li there are IeasonauIe sIouhlS
for slpgas.ls That any BIDDER is inter-
o,ted ih moro than one proposal tAe
~" ~, ~. , r'., q. IN 1b,cI s5id hldde,
is interested
Leonlra-- mat Us my reason.
Mu'Ney--HaNe you any PROOF OF
collUslon'
SERIOUS CHARGE MADE.
Leoudrl-Nu IL i- nara 10 set proof.
The stories have been in the air ana
In the press and Il looked Ike coiiu-
sion 10 me.
MuIvey-Thlt is o serious charge.
F,rustr5m-l understand that c'f-
tain parties have said that one con-
tractor could not have the contract n
any price. Did that have any influence
upon your rejecting the b.ds'
Leonard-No. sir
NulVry-Nhat contractor was thate
FclnsuOm-l heard d. said tndt Mo-
ran could not get the Work al any hg-
ure; that be has been given enough
ana VIII not sel any more
Leonard mat cuts no nsue Win Us,
EDustrom-lt doesn 3 make any die
ference 10 me. but ! don think the
board has the right TO spend dollar
VI ''' -. : me- ''.'1, -''''' -
- ''0'' ~
Leonard-Ne got the city attorneys
opinion. We ala not mean 10 be dis
courteous TO the council Hereafter
YOU VIII get an abstract OF all bids
Mulvey-Didnt you criticise ms
BODY at your meeting friday night
You say you were not discourteOus but
he council was criticised az your meet
Ing.
Leonardo did not cTiticise.
Mulvey- VIII you report the next
time
Leonard-les. We didn't mean to