The Mankato free press. [volume] (Mankato, Blue Earth County, Minn.) 1879-1924, 1906-11-16
COURT WILL BE HELD.
JUDGE CRAY'S TRIBUNAL IS TO
OPEN WEDNESDAY.
Number Of Civil Ceses to Be Heard
BY the Jury; One Criminal
Action.

Clerk OF Court IhOrne has prepared
the calendar for the term of the district
court which opens Wednesday next at
ten o'clock. There are one criminal and
ffty-six civil cases, nearly all of the
civil cases being new ones. The Grim
inal case and nine civil cases come over
from the June term, as follows:
Criminal Case.
State of Minnesota VS.. Otto Peterson,
foi alleged grand larceny in the second
degree, in the theft of tubs of butter
from the Amboy creamery.
Civil Cases.
Lewis d. Roll VS.. Frank A. Roll and
others.
Samuel NJ. Bear VS.. Leslie T. Me
Cleary.
J. NJ. Harris VS.. Robert Burgess and
others.
Charles w. Marks, receiver of the
Amboy Elevator Co., VS.. the Bank of
Amboy and Robert Peterson and others.
T. M. Keogan VS.. Chicago, Milwau
kee & st. Paul railway company.
Thomas McArdle VS.. Michael Nc
Ardle.
Howard w. Kingston VS.. Free Press
Printing Co.
Joseph Boeisad vs.. Chicago Great
Western railway cOmnany
Joseph Christ VS.. d. i. Rose.
The following new civil cases appear
on the calendar:
Macbeth & Gardner VS.. H. r. Kurth.
Ella Mention VS.. Peter w. Merton.
William H. Sands vs. Marcella Clark.
In the matter of the reassessment for
grading Poplar street.
State of Minnesota VS.. Louis Stecker..
z. Reimer VS.. Deutsche Land and
Helm Gesellschaft.
Sidney M. Knox vs.. Pearl r. Knox.
Julius Reinsberg and Hattie Reinsberg
VS.. Alois Pietsch
Bishman Bros. VS.. Elizabeth Roemer.
Sivert Peterson VS.. Peter Peterson.
1.-TWO cases.) ,ub
F. Torkumback VS.. Minnesota Mutual
Fire Insurance company.
c. M. Chapiro vs.. NJ. i. Alderman.
Frederick w. Stanke VS.. Sarah Bit
ner. fy.
In the matter of the guardianship of
Mae, Florence, Harley and Elsie Her.
ring, the above named, respts., VS.. H..
L. Schmitt, guardian, applt.
Anna Hofer VS.. Mary Graeber.
Wendell Hodapp VS.. Oliver A. Thro.
In the matter of the petition of the
Laird Norton yards for the vacation of
an alley in block 81, city of Mankato.
Lydia Engelbrecht VS.. Carl H. Engel-
brecht
Michael Russell vs. J. A. Stockdill
and Josephine Stockdill.
Mary E. Russell VS.. j. A. Stockdill
and Josephine Stockdill.
Nathan w. Sargent vs. Cora Sargent
Smith & Wymat VS.. o. NJ. Hagwall,
jury case.
Patrick Ellis vs. Nora Ellis and w.
R. Hammett.
Livingston Bean VS.. Caroline D. Bean,
court case
In the matter of the appeal from or
ders of the probate court, estate of
Aida Laurisch, deceased, Mary Laur-
iscb, applt., VS., M. M. Sauerhering,
respt.
Same vs. D. Sauerhering and others,
respts.
Charles Kuphal' VS.. John T. Shanks.
Margaret Culvege VS.. city of Mankato
and Alexander Bashaw.
Maukato Sidewalk Co. and w. G.
Hoerr VS.. F. Glasgow.
NeIs Henning VS.. Jesse F. Polzin, W..
f. Polzin and Mankato Savings and
Building assn. Law case.
August Neible VS.. Emelia Neible.
Nellie Van Alstyne VS.. Chicago Great
Western railway company and George
Atchison
Charles Ramey VS.. Chicago, Milwau-
kee & st. Paul, railway company.
Grace A. Ager as guardian of the per-
son and estate of Martha ZELDA Ager
and Raymond w. Ager, minors, VS.. the
Modern WOodmen of America.
Frank Wenner VS.. Louis and Lorenz
j Mayer.
George w. Clark VS.. Louise Clark.
Otto Dollar VS.. Chicago, st. Paul,
Minneapolis & Omaha railway company,
jury case.
Mary E. Kneeland VS.. Frederick A..
Kneeland.
Clarence Prescott VS.. II. R. Kurth.
In the matter of the application of
John Neary and wife for leave to adopt
Lillian Theresa Sullivan.
In the matter of the application of
the city treasurer of the city of Man
kato for judgment, lot 10, block 40.
Same, lot 3, block "a.
Village of Madison Lake, respt., vs..
Charles Reinsburg, applt.
State of Minnesota vs.. A. NJ Morri-
son. Tax case.
Same VIC EiJart Er;oESop Tox o,So