The Birmingham age-herald., 1906-10-16
RECORD OF THE COURTS.

The usual activity which attends the first day of the week in the court house was evident yesterday morning. Juries were empaneled in the circuit city and criminal court. Judge Coleman returned from his trip to Greensboro. looking con aderahly improved by his visit
 Circuit Court.
 In the circuit court the first five cases set on yesterdays docket were in the name Of Jerry Fountain as administrator against the Alabama Steel and Wire company. owing to the death of the ad- nl,nistrator T. B. Stallings was granted letters of administration, de bonis non, in the estate of Walter McCay and Pat rick McCay.
 When the court convened at ? o'clock tho attorneys stated that the pleadngs would take up the rest of the day, if not longer, and immediately the court eX- cdsed all parties and jurors until 9:3o this morning.
 Circuit Court Docket.
 The following docket is set for trial in the circuit court today;
 Board of trustees of University of Ala tama vs. M. M Nichols, ejectment; G. B. McDemore vs. Rugby Land company, damages; Birdie M. Crenshaw vs. First National Bank of Birmingham, assump- sit; J. D. $. Davis vs Mrs s. E. Fraley, ct al assumpslt Maria Chaugnot vs. Louis Negron, ejectment.
 City Court.
 In the first division of the city court one jury only was empaneled. No cases were tried yesterday and the following cases were disposed of:
 Charles Greganus vs. Belt Line Rail road company, dismissed for want of prosecution; Samuel Fl. Hutchinson vs. S1oss- Sheffield Steel and Iron company, Judgment for plaintiff for $6o0; W. T. Bentley vs. J. A. Herrick, judgment for plaintiff for $7231.
 First Division Docket. In the first division of the city court the following docket Is set for today:
 Adler & Co. vs. H. w. Perry ct al., as- l sumpst; H. Altman vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, dam l Gges; L. Kronenberg vs. Mayor and Coun- l rll of Graysville. ejectment; Alabama l State Land company vs. Tom Vines ct als., ejectment; Alabama State Land company vs. Tom Glover ct al, eject tlent; Dan Hardy vs. Alabama Great Southern Railroad company. damages; H.. | l. Goldsten Vs. l.. Jaffe, appeal LaVona J. Price vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages.
 In the second division of the city court yesterday the case of Amanda McDaniel vs John C. Forney was dismissed for want of prosecution
 Charles A. Hassler vs. Charles R. Wal 1 ter, judgment of lower court quashed.
 Alabama National Bank vs. N. w. Hen ry ct al., dismissed
 Second Division Docket.
 The following docket is set for trial in | the second division of the city court to- l day:
 Willis Eastis vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company damages; | Adler &s Co., Vs. H. F. Debardeleben, as- sumpsit; Singer Manufacturing company Vs S. II. King ct als., assumpsit; J. T. l Alley ct al vs. Green Winstead eject ment; l.. A. Keith vs. J. H. Ward ct al., appeal; George Pagan vs. Mrs. J. w.. | Iledd. claim of exemptions, Jonas Schwab company vs. J. s. Gerganus; Maysie h.. Young vs. Carlos Veitch ct al, assumpsit; I. l.. Tinney vs. V. C. Smith x Co.,, detlnue; Bullock McAdory and Martin vs. | Consolidated Electric company, certiorari; 1 Mayberry Hardware company vs. w. H. | Jones ct al, assumpsit
 New Suits Filed.
 The following new suits were filed in 1 the city court yesterday l Mrs Minnie Lilies ys. Western Union Telegraph company. Plaintiff sues for sl99J damages for the alleged negligence of the defendant in failing to deliver tele- l gIhm within reasonable time.
 Mrs. M E. Baldwin sues Western Union Telegraph company for s2000 for alleged | failure to deliver a telegram within a 1 reasonable time.
 | Emma Scott sues the Birmingham Rail | way. Light and Power company for 5000 | for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through falling from car sud | denly started.
 ! Henry G. Nordmeh vs. Birmingham | Hallway, Light and Power company. Plaintiff claims s5O00 for personal injuries alleged to have been received from fall | ing down an embankment after being