The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1906-05-30

helnf tH tuf. fi HHfftu NJ ief poo lH'"
iepai ~ isff ll Iaf HI tHs .Has ftIi ittt sIirH
M Hl.fHfrH iiUUt ftrrHra Wtr0f rHi ~
rsHHV ffsH il ffH Htr hHaii vtH
had at w u tst5riai q pa wIfr tnHi
~ ttnfeils HmUHfiftflH ~ .f thNa
Iislshuntv rfeffsi liiHtbHaNi iH Confetti
hlmneif ttrrtli rrri ths wurey tui
%s,aaetnshi cent ~ ftrars
f%eiahtntv sfaHi % yaaf ip atrt'Hft Fitb
CsHnrkt In tifuHf fri go fhrn inHiftrfrt
~ ges the Inf |rFaI iIIrui Hr iHuffNle ~
Hrdontr aui t1Hitwi u"'iet t 1Dtret
CaRnFtI aNi Hirtuu tHnnrht w. en- tItIf
b 80 nafvrv n WIr"tn me le0ti1f fni
ttrtiss. Ann \ kreriH. UF fhnfr sHa HIn.
aHef tile di14pfN M Iuih ~ fhrae $3.50
Ne HinHtHn Ftnirl RI Ufr retainer 4ni InrIfue
Sas sfef tufti.a
6sTstbr 40 ~ HRrp,fe ~ rpHtt ,gr1
Wban fieishuntv ct iars in fhe NV, hs
fereived thia lsttef fflw 'tuf"lI
stu,uu, trrn sep' Iof
Wv pftt toss yrlft r~arri.rl 40 Hita
The fcaarn Cufilss a. huidHps lHr..H 81
feauesi under consideration yHs hf rNsH he
had already henn spoken iu iu mr h"hW
rep s~~is asp pIur va plao Iuf"r,I"N"l
b. friends murh urtfnf 'htu VIZ stHu"h.
aeld ran eyer boo lh" same U,''Ia" rifh
Hinman Therefore nll viii ir plain sailing
IN that direction for Nr s'iu"h0old and
there IL mo- reason iu the world Nh' ha path
should no, b" perfectly smooth
Tho outslls ad NJ Vhich I spnRs vas for
yourself onl, such ad viii NOT mas" itself
known To- any one Noyerihcl"-a 70 wil boz
extended. and ( am sure r ~ hs ofr1cious iu
aiding your and Mr. star.hHnld oFprfs
Much has been don" In that re- poet. and much
more viii be- done That does NOT mean hat
Mr.. StanchnnlI shall In any way relax hI-
own efforts, and ~ no one want. any glory.
but only success. no one viii roHp any but
you and Mr. StauchGeld
Don't YOU thirA ~ would he vlso 10 scnd
TO all the wttuc-se. whom YOU believe VA
he subpBnaed and notify them personally
Of their position In the matter. aud that under
the law A. u now stands they need not reply
10 any questions of u damaging ChdraCterp
Also do you not thluk that Luce and Nasser-
mann should he informed that their previous
testimony must be- revised II necessary. and
In Wassermann's cas-" ought he not to be- told
that he must rrvok" IT,
DO you not also think II would be wise
or at least good form 10 tell everybody that
Mr.. Garfield will defray the expenses Of all
witnesses subjected to any inconvenience
in either mine or MIR. Bucklin'- cases?
l leave the matter in your hands with avery
confidence and am sure MIR. StanchGeld and
yourself will achieve a victory. Had | hope a
very early one. | am. yours a. ever.
Il. 4. c.
Explaining this letter, Delahunty testi-
fed that 1t was his idea and Canfeld's to
get the trials over as soon as possible, be-
cause OF the Lewisohn appeal. which was
then before the Court Of Appeals. Curtiss
accepted Canfield's retainer, but Human
was more reluctant, and Garfield sent sew
eral kilograms on this subject One Of these
sent on September IL read as follows;
HAD A FlsHHooK IN JEROME oFFIcn.
Understand you were TO ascertain day be-
fore yesterday after our talk over telephone
and advise me. Am sure IL would be bad
blunder not to engag e him. and / I'm COM
mitted to that step. Therefore it must be
done at once or serious harm to my interests
will ensue. X, 4. c..
Other equally urgent kilograms came on
the saline day and then this letter:
My DEAR JOHN: / think | shall be in q
position some day TO let you know whom
Jerome will subpoena. so we may put a spoke
in his wheel.
am most anxious about Human and
think it unwise not to secure him now. after
Dunn is committed as he has been. 1t might
make him shift If he thought his advice was
ignored.
The strong point for US is to force Jerome
TO a showdown, | should think.
What a blnckguard lot the Jersey City
crowd are! What had Hostetter TO do with
Buck? He owed us nothing. and ! do not
even know the man. We had no paper OF his,
and his wife said so. A damned blackguard
lot. and hope you punish them severely.
As ever, DICK.
The Dunn referred to in this and u pre-
vious letter, is said to be Col. George W.
Dunn Of Broome county, on ce chairman Of
the Republican county committee, but
Delahunty was not questioned on this
point. He did cay that Garfield was using
nHnrt 70 IiGpnp uuhnt tho mn lrn of
the evidence In Jerome's Possession was,
and how best to fight it. Human accepted
Capfield's retainer, on which Garfield wrote
to Delahunty that he was very glad, as other
wise there might have been many comph-
cations.
H~osTETTRR'S NAME NOT
There was quite a spat in the reading of
this letter over Hostetter's name. +. L.
Mooney, counsel for Delahunty, was toe
hoarse to read aloud, and his associate, Mr..
Hanford, read. MIR. Hanford first read what
had Blank to do with BuckY' but read in the
name Hostetter afterward, apparently.
at the suggestion Of Some ore.
Mr.. Mooney declared Indignantly that
Garfield had suggested the reading of the
name in violation of the agreement that
names should be left out where possible.
Hostetter is said TO have lost a good deal
of money gambling, and Garfield was
apparently under the impression that he
hNAN N"S sNRhA -
Jersey City early in 1903.
If Mr.. Garfield wants Names said Mr..
Mooney, "he can have all he wants of them;
but il he does not, he must respect all or
none"
PERHAPS INSPECTOR M~'LAUGHLIN WILL HEL
Justice Newburger smoothed down Mr..
Mooney with the remark that he had not
heard Garfield mention the name and the
trial proceeded with the reading of AN
fields next letter to Delahunty, in which
he showed plainly hat he had secret ways
OF getting information concerning what
was going on in Mr.. Jerome's Office. Thel
letter, written at Saratoga Springs in 1908,
reads:
Ny DEAR JoHS-Subpnnas have been is
sued to be served on Monday for Jacobs.
O'Neill. Evans. Luce and Lewisohn. Others
will probably be issued. how many l do not
know. but | will try and inform you. Luce
arrived from st. Louis this morning and leaves
for New York at 1 this afternoon. . l
have learned on indubitable evidence. which
unfortunately for us cam OF be used. that
Jerome knows that Jacobs was never In the
house and that his entire testimony concern
ing me and my affairs Is perjury. l an on the
track OF what may possibly turn out to be
proof of the same. but as it Is such a doubtful
matter l prefer to say nothing about IL until