The Birmingham age-herald., 1906-06-20
RECORD OF COURTS
Criminal Court.

STlIlindl Co0ih' The following convictions were made in the first division of the criminal court yesterday; Just Kavase grand larceny George Caldwell, grand larceny; Lock Woods assault and battery with weapon Will Miller, grand larceny Jack Brown burglary.
 A. Walters, Il white man, was also convicted of stealing watch from Car rie Woods.
 Cases in the second division that re- suited in convictions were as follows; Tar ry Adams petty larceny; VIII Meadows assault and battery with weapon; Dick Walker, trespassing; Sam Lovelace. as sault and battery with weapon.
 City Court of Birmingham. In the first division of the city court the continuation of the case of J. G. Roebuck pro ami. vs. the Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company. oc- cupied most of yesterdays session. It was given to the jury in the late after noon.
 The following cases were dismissed for want of prosecution in the second divs- ion:
 Fannie Dugger vs Mrs Annie Clifford
 Rena Ellard vs Mrs. j. A. Welman. l.. o. Chisling Vs. J. P. Lawrence.
 M. N. Freed vs. II. B. Hopper
 Jim Blackburn vs. Chew Trangalli. John Stevenson vs. Nose Clay The case of the Enterprise Distilling company vs Y IL Bowers was dismissed for want of prosecution.
 In the case of Helen Stone vs. Lee Stone, a judgment for $120 was rendered.
 In the case of George H. Stevenson. as receiver vs. J. II. Williamson ct al. the motion of the respondents to dismiss the original bill for want of equity was over ruled.
 In the case of Ira Van Salter vs the Tutwiler Coal Coke and Iron company decision was rendered against the de- fendant. In the same case also, the re- port of the clerk and register in regard to building a school house and the fee to be paid the attorney was confirmed.
 Today's docket in the first division is | as follows:
 | George Moore vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company; damages. A. o. Lane; Hugh Morrow.
 Ernest Earle, pro ami. vs. Tennessee Coal Iron and Railroad company; dam ages. Frank S White X Sons; Walker | Percy.
 | Rufus White, pro ami. Vs. Tennessee | Coal Iron and Railroad company; dam 1 ages. Bowman Harsh & Beddow; Percy | & Benners.
 A. D. Allen vs. Alexander T. London assumpslt. Bowman, Harsh X Beddow | London X London | James M Jones vs. Sayre Mining and Manufacturing company; damages. Bow man, Harsh & Beddow; Tillman, Grubb, l Bradley & Morrow. l Henrietta Williams vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company; dam- ages George L. Smith ct al: Hugh Mor- row.
 1 Chancery Court.
 In the cases of Barbara Gayle. H. A. l Harrington, Charles J. Martin, Jr., s. N. | Puc1ett and Mary J. Mccormick vs. the mayor and aldermen of Birmingham de- | crees were rendered overruling the mo- tions to dismiss, and allowing thirty days for the plaintiffs to amend. | In the case of E. N. George vs Leola | J. Mothershed, decree was rendered dis missing the bill without prejudice. W. A. Reed vs Priscilla Coleman ct al. was the style of suit which resulted in decree dismssing the bill of complaint as amended without prejudice | Louis A. Roy, one of the thirty seven heirs of James A. Roy, deceased, has asked in filed petition that Chan | cellor Benners remove the administration | of the deceased's estate from the probate court, and that he will assume all author | ity over the said estate. The suit Is against Mrs. Cecela N. Roy and others, and the bill petitions furthermore. that the lands. which are estimated to be worth about S100.0OO. be sold for the pur- pose of setting aside proper homes stead and dover rights for the widow and the distribution of the rest among the differ | ent heirs.