The Birmingham age-herald., 1906-11-19
RECORD OF THE COURTS

 Jurors summoned to attend court this week are required to be in court at s30 o'clock this morning Much complaint has been made about the dilatory attend ance of jurors and witnesses whose ab- scence or 1ateness causes the loss of much time One morning last week Judge Weaver said that he would issue attach ments for all witnesses who failed to answer when called and that the mere fact of their living out of the city would not excuse them.
 Circuit Court Docket.
 Ia the circuit court the following docket Is set for today:
 A. E. Lewis vs. w. H. Worthington, assumpsit; James Murphy vs. Southern Railway company damages; Lucy Hall vs. Great Southern Home Industrial asso- citation, appeal; J. l.. Addington vs. Ma tional Roofing and Paving company, ap- peal; Stowers Furniture company, ap G. Brake ct al., appeal; Sayres Mercan- tile company vs. w. c. 'Agee &s Co.,, ap- peal; French, Mitchell, Woodbury Co.,, vs John w. o'Neill Co.,, appeal; Annie L. Howle vs Western Union Telegraph company, damages; Charles Whelan vs. Central of Georgia Railroad company, damages; J. W. Herring vs. Alabama Great Southern Railroad company, dam- ages.
 City Court.
 In the first division of the city court this week jury trials will be held; non- jury trials will be heard in the second division of the citv court
 First Division Docket.
 The following docket is set for trial in the first division of the city court to- day:
 M. N. Parks ct al., pro ami, vs. Bella Lisenbar ct al, ejectment; M N. Parkes ct al, pro ami, vs. Lizzie Brammer ct al, ejectment: E. V. Frankling pro ami, ys. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; Steve Williams vs. Western Union Telegraph company, dam ages; Henry Hannah vs DeSoto Mining and Development company, damages; Mary Saddler vs H. Lowenthal, eject ment Mary Hartgan vs. Hewes & Booth, assumpsit; Joseph B. Hill vs. Central of Georgia Railroad company damages; A. B. Roberts vs. St. Louis and San Fran cisco Railroad company, damages; J. P. Weller vs. B. Zavelo ct al., assumpsit; J. V. Jones vs. Tutwiler Coal, Coke and Iron company, damages.
 Second Division Docket.
 In the second division of the city court the following docket is set for today: c. M McGinns vs. A. D. Morrow, ap peal; c. E. Cox vs Rates Transfer com pany, appeal; B. F. Poole vs. Dr. E. A. Morris, appeal; c. M. McMahon vs Twin McReynolds. assumpsit A. Latady, re- ceiver, vs. w. T. Terry, assumpsit; Head S. Hing vs D. P Jackson assumpsit; M. L. Ritter vs Palos Coal and Coke com pany. assumpslt; Rena Elard vs. Mrs. J. A. Wideman, ejectment; J. H. Ward vs. James Slaughter, ejectment; Bell x Miles vs. Sam Pappageorge, attachment; Ken nedy Slave and Cooperage company dam ages Alabama State Land company vs. B. F. Rogers ejectment; L. L. Schwartz vs. Louis Pizitz, assumpst.
 Chancery Court Docket.
 The following docket is set in the chan cery court today
 o. w. Page vs. w. H. Tharpe; Houston  Hobbs vs. James F. Bagley, Mary F. Fletcher vs. James M. Fletcher, George l.. Lipscomb vs. Alabama Western Rail- road company, Ebb Tarrant vs Mollie Tarrant, Mary P H. Andrews vs. James U. Hardman ct al, Charles B. Powell, guardian, vs. R. D. Johnson.
 Federal Court.
 In the federal court this morning the case of the United States vs. Alexander R. Chisolm will be resumed. The in- ouiry into the defendants mental cond- ton Is at present engaging the attention of the court and jury.
 Grand Jury.
 The grand jury is expected to make it's report today; it is said there will be some very surprising features in the report