Oxford Democrat. [volume] (Paris, Me.) 1833-1933, 1906-03-20

fence arguing tnet tho 8CclQeut WE pure
" an accident, for which no ono was re-
sponsible, unless It may have been the
plaintiff himself, for his manner Of using
the machine.
Wright & Wheeler for plaintiff; Bisbee
& Parker for defendant.
This was short case, the evidence be-
ing concluded about o'clock In the
afternoon of Friday. The jury remain
cd out until some after 10 o'clock, when
they were excused by order Of court, and
the next morning they reported that
they were unable to agree.
A. there was nothing moro ready for
trial at that. time, after the juries had re-
ported Saturday morning, they were ex-
cused until Tuesday morning, and the
court suspended until Monday, many Of
those in attendance going home on the
forenoon trains to spend Sunday.
The grand jury, which has been busy
all the week, has not yet finished Its
work. 1t Is expected that 1t will report
Tuesday morning, and that work on
the criminal docket will begin az soon
thereafter as practicable. The remain
ing civil business of the term will follow
the criminal business.
Instead Of sandwiching in the divorce
cases with the others. Judge Spear will
appoint q day toward the last of the
term, when they will be heard.
1t is probable that the case of Wesley
Chick of Porter, who is charged with the
murder of David Varney, will be taken
up soon after the gand jury reports, If an
indictment is found. The witnesses who
testified before the grand jury have
been retained here, and it is understood
that quite a number more have been
summoned to be here this week. F. A.
Fox, Esq, of Kezar Falls, appeared for
Chick at the hearing, and 1t is expected
that Hon. James S. Wright of South
Paris will be appointed by the court to
defend him.
Twenty-seven civil cases now remain
on the trial list, as follows:
1893. Marshal 8. Whitney vs.. Perley A. Whitney.
swasey. McGillicuddy 4 MOrey.
252. Susan H. Whitney vs.. Marshal 8. Viii ney.
Watson. Manser. Swa ey.
lOs. Burt Manufacturing Co. VS.. John Briggs.
Wright 4 Wheeler. Swasey.
no. Anthoine A. Leferrier vs.. Kennedy Island
Gray. Wright & Wheeler
lls. Trustees Fryeburg Academy vs.. Geo. II.
Warren Foster & Foster.
Wright Il Wheeler.
lbs. Jennie NJ. Smith vs.. Grand Trunk Railway
Hazen. Hight Hight.
$780, smb Haskell VS., George + H hssiisss
l4o. Kendall W. Ellington vs.: Lizzie Getcher.
Swasey. Wright & Wheeler.
1is. JJ. Fuller ct al We. Jesse E. Fuller.
Swasey.
Bridgham. Wright & Wheeler.
l43. Inhabitants Of Canton vs.. o. A. McFadden.
symonds, Snow, Cook & Hutchinson.
10. Albert Thompson vs.. Stephen b. Cum
Kimball & Son. Holt 4 Barnes.
Stearns. Smith.
l7s. woodsum Scribner VS.. Roy II. Lord.
Fl. II. Hastings. Holt & Barnes.
ls2. John 2. Waterman vs.. Chas. W. Gray ct
Hazen. Wright & Wheeler.
swasey. Wright & Wheeler.
203. Inhabitants Of Roxbury vs. Inhabitants OF
Turner.
Swasey. Wing.
eli. Harris l.. Elliott, appellant, vs.. Alonzo
Stevenson. Gleason & Blanchard.
2l9. John Broncharenko vs.. Max Greenburg,
appellant.
Stevenson. McCartny.
go. Robain Arsenault. appellant, vs.. VIM. Fitz.
patrick ct trustee.
Gleason & Blanchard. Stevenson.
Foster.
a2l. Rumford National Bank vs. Ahmad Joseph
ct al, appellants.
Gleason Blanchard. Swasey.
235. Nahum w. Bennett va. R. Weymouth ct ais
ct trustee.
Heriick d Park. H. H. Hastings.
247. WI. Watson. appellant, vs.. stanwood c.
Wilmington.
Watson. Manser. Dyer.
253. Alfred Pearl vs.. Chas. c. Davis, appellant.
Hazen. Holt Il Barnes.
25s Alfred Pearl, appellant, vs.. Charles c. Davis.
HaZen. Holt Barnes.
oa. Herbert L. Ames. appellant, vs. VIM. Mann.
Foster. stevenson.
255 Deerng Harvester Co. We. Ernest L. Holt.
Richards. Harlow.
Wright & Wheeler.