The Birmingham age-herald., 1906-10-08
RECORD OF THE COURTS.

Jury trials in the circuit court both divisions of the city court and the first division of the criminal court will be the means of assembling a big conoourse of people in the court house today. No less than eighty-four men will be on jury ser- vice this week at the rate of $2 per diem per man. If this number of men serve five days it will amount to ss4O, to winch may be added at least s6o more for excused jurors, making altogether the sum of s90o for jury service for one week.
 In view of the big cost of running the courts, the judges wish to let attorneys and clients understand that they must attend punctually in court and assist to dispatch business as rapidly as possible.
 Circuit Court Docket.
 In the circuit co,irt this morning the Following docket of cases set for today will be called at 10 o'clock.
 Carter Williams, administrator, vs. Ala bama Great Southern Railroad company, damages; Charles c. Lawrence vs. J. w. Mcqueen, assumpsit; James F. Smith vs Sloss- Sheffield Steel and Iron company, damages, W. C. Hamilton vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, dam ages; C. Ii. Wright. pro ami vs T. L. Moses, damages; J. M. Cox company vs. "A. T. Kilan, assumpsit; Brack Honey cutt vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; Kettle P. Brannon, administratrix, vs. Birmingham Railway and Electric company, damages; Vincent Tilley vs Nick Brooks, damages; Birmingham Paint and Roofing company Ns Thomas Pool, appeal.
 City Court Docket
 In hn fret wi Gin of ho ri ty Judge Senn presiding, the following dock ct is set for today:
 J. r. Hill administrator, vs. Southern Railway company. damages; M. H. Collins vs. Western Union Telegraph company, damages; Thomas Hudson. pro ami, vs. Pioneer Mining and Manufacturing com pany, damages; M. c. Reynolds Lumber company vs. Alabama Great Southern Railroad company, appeal by defendant; H. T. Lankford vs. Union Foundry and Machine company, assumpsit; J. w. John, pro ami vs. Birmingham Realty com pany, damages; Eliza White. adminlstra- trix, vs. Southern Railway company, dam ages; J. C. Murry vs. Birmingham Rail- way. Light and Power company, dam ages; Isaac Roebuck vs. Allen States ct al, ejectment; James A. Going vs. Charles G. Brown. assumpsit: Thomas Weathers vs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad company. damages.
 second DiVlSIOns
 In the second division of the city court Judge Ferguson presiding, the following docket is set for today
 Moss Mims vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company. damages; w. s. Patton vs. Fidelity and Deposit com pany of Maryland, damages; J. M. Swain vs. L. Kronenberg. assumpsit; George R. Pocl,hole vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company damages: T. H. Spencer te Co.,, vs. Birmingham Railway Light and Power company Mary Brown, admnistratrix, vs. Pioneer Mining and Manufacturing company, damages; Besse- ncr Land and Improvement company vs. ton vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company, damages; Ella White VIZ. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad com pary. damages; D1thap Bottling Works and Manufa cturings company vs. Bir- mingham Bottle Supply company, dam ages; Jack White Ys Birmingham Rail- way, Light and Power company, damages
 Chancery Court Docket.
 The following docket Is set in the chan cery court today:
 Walter Hoffman rs. l.. w. Johns: Joseph H. Parsons vs. B. F. Downey ct al; Au- gustus J. Camp vs. Annie W. Dallas ct al; Mollie J. Jackson vs. Henry l.. Bad ham; AXondale Mills vs. Avondale Ice company; Perryman 6 Co. vs W. M Montgomery; F. F. Cheatham vs. Ensley Land company.