Morning appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1877-1906, 1906-04-03
= part of the


q. no disavnwa'
no % - r9nnCt Justify
H. ~ ~r8ph in that
on'~
'ir,~orf eo-
manner in oh he conducts himself
IN hi int 20 ii 10 courts. He
ray be rc7n7t and capable, and yet
n -'-t t. % to "Cntin-
TALL rte --,' the s'ness Of the
courts in ~ he n a"tices: or he
re = r~7atio I'D continuous
course % " Grct. render it impossi-
bic fer - ~" IS to preserve their
self re- - the respect of the
public ar 2 the same time permit
him to act IS an officer and attorney.
An attO~ro - 'h"s 7''1diously and
systnn-a47-. ++o~~r,'~ 70 bring the
Tribunals ice VITO 0ublic con
tempt is an ~nfit person to hold the
| nOsitior 90 o-0ro'ee Va privileges Of
an officer e trcSe tribunals An open
notoriou@ on pubic Insult to the
highest iud@o3-' tribunal IF the State
| for which = ~+t0r0o.- o~nturna q ',ciV
refuses IN 49, vav t. otone. may JUS
tifv the ve""~al Of that tribunal to
recOgrfze y in the future as one of
it's officers
In re- "o~r>or 90 VI. go. the re-
snonden+ f"ei for ir~nica'lv stat
ing to W 80 Of tho peace. 81 think
this mao To wilson than the SUI
prnr,e co,,r' . Re9tip'd G. J.. said
The cCu~~o' r>nst submit IN jus
tica court sc well rs in this court,
and with tNo some formal resnect
however difficult. it may he either
hero cr tho"n."
We 90 ', - coo that tho ralatOr has
any alternative left him but the sub
mission 10 wNat g n" doubt regards
as q misc pu~phaHsiCn IF the law. both
on the part of the Justice and Of this
court And in that respect he is in =
condition vn similar To r1anv who
have failed to convince others OF the
/ sCundness Cf their own views, or to
| became convinced themselves fthelr
d. falacy."
IN Nahonev V. STATE. 7" n e. ISL.
u a. attorre-- vas finod $50 for saying
i 4 want to see whether the court is
! right or rot vaui 7, know whether
] an g~ing 70 he heard in tais case in
! the interests OF my cheat or ~
! and making either insOlent statements
= In Redman V. State % Ind. the iudg:
! Informed counsel that a question va:
= | improper and the attorney replied:
- IF we cannot eve mine cur "}tnesso
:, he can stand aside This langrag t
was deemed cffens ive and the cour
" nrChibited that particular attOrne,
-. from examining the next witness.
In Brown U Brown " Ind. 72.. III
lawvo~ was taved with the cost Of n
. | action for fling and reading netitiol
: COR divorce which was unnecessarii,
=; gross and indicate.
- In Mccormick Y. Sheridan 20 .. -
IS. Cal. "A netiran for rphearin.
y, stated that how or whv the honorabI
=. cor mission should have SO efectuall
o. and substantially ignored an' 6isr5
. gardna tha vncontradicted tae+iwonv
:, we do not know. It seems tnat ne
r Their the transcript nor cur brief
- could have fallen under the commits
=, ! ei0ners observation. 4 more disir
:. pnnious and misleading staten, nnt c
d the evidence could not well be made
N II is substantially untrue and unW21
+. ranted. The decision seems TO us
d r
. that counsel drafting the netition wa
# guilty of contempt comDitte0 IN IN
N face of the court. Notwithstanding
F. dieav0wal of disrespectful intention
9 4 fine Of 5000 was imposed with an a
formative of serving in jail
NO Tho Chief Justice speaking for RI
=. court in State Y. Morrill, 16 Ark. 81
> said:
=, IF = va the general habit Of til
y community % donOunce degrade an
II disregard the decisions Sa"d i'ld@'nen
g, o. tho courts. pc man of se'f-reSDe
tx and just pride of re1u:4 u WH"ld I
~ main anon the bench. and such on
,e vcul1 hnc0r,n tAa minister's ~ "
. lew as were insensihIe 70 defamatfc
= and ccntor'n+ Put hannilv for =
10 good order of society, men. an espe
IT. iallv the people of TINS country
to GOV, oral'-- diernsed to roSD""f @f
10 abide the decisions Of the tribuna
a 9 ,raainad bv government as II" CO..
mon arhiters Of their rights, K
IT, where isolated individuals. IN viol
IS ton of the better instincts OF hVmf
= nature. and uiSregardful of law ~
If | order. wCntanlv attempt to obstru
ut ne course Of public justice hv disr
TO 32rdlng anu tAtltlHS N-oi i'N>' !
nj the decisions o. its trinnna 5. eve
he good citizen will point them out
IN p~one~ subjects for legal anlmadVf
sion.
"a A court must naturally look first
Sc an ENLIGHTENED end conservative bi
su- governed by a high sense or prot
-. siopai ethics and deeHly sensible.
81 thew always are. OF its necessity
IF aid IN the maintenance OF public r
or pect for its opinions
ID In Son7 ers V. TOrrey. 5 Paige Oh.
ect % Am. D. All. it was hold that the
Of ,orneyw no nut his hand to scandalC
iC~ and imDertinent matter stood again
its the comp a 'nant end one not pa
led to the suit is liaole to the censure
1ut the court end chargeable with
cot cost of the proceedings to have it
Oc- plunged from the record.
I'M In State V Grailhe. ! La. Am. l