The Birmingham age-herald., 1905-11-07

ct all; dismissed.
 Benjamin T. Rochester vs. Belle Scar lett; dismissed.
 Paul Cole vs. D. M. Horseley; decree confirming registers report.
 The following is the chancery court docket today;
 Hinds Peevey vs. Alabam club. ct al.
 Milner-Kettig company vs. Railroad Compress company.
 Moore & Handley Hardware company vs. Railroad Compress company.
 Charles Hall vs. Railroad Compress company
 MeIvina Snyder vs. Jesse Snyder.
 Virginia Williams vs. David s. Will Hams.
 The following petitions were filed in the city court yesterday:
 J. NJ. Thompson vs. Alabama Steel and Wire company for s20,0Oo damages for alleged personal injuries received in the Ensley plant of the defendant company on May ', 1905
 William wilmore vs. Birmingham Rail- way, Light and Power company. for 5000 damages for injuries sustained on June 15, of this year.
 Mrs Rebecca Dowdall vs. Birmingham Railway Light and Power company, for $5oOO damages, for injuries sustained on October 25, 1905.
 Mack Stagg vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company for sl0000 damages, for alleged assault imposed by a conductor who was in the employ of the company
 B. B. Hudson vs. Atlanta and Birmlng- ham Air Line for $500 damages for alleged failure of the company to deliver certain goods.
 Sparks Bros, vs. George c. Phillips for $l1S0 alleged to be due on a note.
 The following cases were disposed of in the second division of the city court, Judge senn presiding, yesterday morn ing:
 Sol H. Frelberg vs Brents & Strange, dismissed by plaintiff.
 Birdie Lee McLendon vs. J. w. Elliott ct al, non-suit entered by plaintiff
 B. A. Lewis vs. J. T. Robertson, set tied and dismissed.
 Luther Simmons vs. L. V. Clark ct aI, dismissed for want of Jurisdiction.
 Republic Iron and Steel company ys. S. E. Hilton. appeal dismissed.
 Alabama Land company vs. B. o. Watkins dismissed at cost of defendant.
 w. L. Sellers vs. Woodward Iron com pany, and G. M. Lawley vs. Woodward Iron company, dismissed for want of prosecution.
 Hackney and Furham vs. Harry Rus sell, dismissed for want of prosecution
 J. Nichols and company vs. Birmingham Ore company, dismissed for want of prose- cuton.
 William A. Byles ct al., ys. T. c. Thomp- son, default with leave to prove dam ages.
 Louisville and Nashville Railroad com pany vs. United States Cast Iron Pipe and Foundry company, assumpsit on trial. The case of the Louisville and Nashville Railroad company vs. the United States Cast Iron. Pipe and Foundry company is on trial In the second division of the city court.
 The following jurors have been em- paneled in the first division of the city court for this week:
 Jury No. 1-J. D. Greshman, Andrew II. Dunlap, William o. Donell, Jim Mason. J. II. Howard. John W. Smart, J. w. Self. N. E. Thompson, J. A. Love, R. l.. Has Ter, II, w. Coker, D. D. Atkinson.
 Jury No. 2--Tom Baker, E. l.. Payne. c. M. Sellers, 8. J. Page. J. T. Chlslon, w. II. Reynolds. Tom Stone. T. D. Brad ford, A. J. Herring, l.. l.. Yates, R. D. Wade, W. M. Newton.
 The case of Mrs. Josephine Nowlin vs. the Southern Railway company Is on trial in the circuit court.
 The following jurors have been em- paneled in the circuit court for this week;
 Jury No. 1-William Sellers. Walter A. Reynolds. J. J. Kimbrough, J. T. Will son, Ernest Redd, John Core. D. w. Nash, J. M. Foster, P. l.. Jones, Will Bell, E. T. Kendrick, A. l.. Wilson.
 Jury No. 2.-E. T. Shaw, R. l.. Payne.