The Birmingham age-herald., 1905-01-10
City Court of Birmingham.

No. 14334 Riley and Silk vs. Kansas City, Memphis and Birmingham railroad; damages.
 No. 14377. A. W. Rittenberry. adminis- trator, vs. Louisville and Nashville rail- road; damages.
 No. 14,SS5. Rosa L. Foley vs. New York Life Insurance company; assumpsit. No. 14O6 Evart V. Franklin, pro ami, vs. Birmingham Railway, Light and Power company; damages.
 No. 15,693. Greenberry Vines vs. Ala bama Consolidate Coal and Iron com pany; damages. SECOND DIvISION-Non-jur docket. Judge Charles A. Senn, presiding. The following judgments were entered yesterday:
 Nick Dezia vs. Ben Speigner; for de- fendant.
 Dr. w. A. McDaniel vs Southern Ex- press company; dismissed. the defendant to pay the costs.
 Heldt-Nelson Coal & Lumber Go. vs. B O. Watkins; dismissed for want of prosecution.
 J. w. Clayton & Co. vs. G. S. Hurley; plaintiff takes non-suit.
 The following cases were disposed of yesterday:
 Bessemer Savings bank vs. Edgar L. Mitchell judgment for plaintiff on note for $S1O
 Bessemer Savings Bank vs. Joseph L. Sullivan, Judgment for plaintiff on note for s169. 40.
 Bessemer Savings bank vs J. M. Horn. Judgment for plaintiff on note for $lS4 80. Bessemer Savings bank vs. J. R. San ders and J. C. Burgin, judgment for plaintiff on note for $65.
 Bessemer Savings bank vs. G. M. Love- joy, judgment for plaintiff on note for Ss32 .3S
 Bessemer Savings bank vs B. D. Par sons and I. F. Parsons, judgment for plaintiff on note for $184.SO
 Bessemer Savings bank ~. J. B. Bur gin, Judgment for plaintiff on note for $122
 Bessemer Savings bank vs. W. F. No- Ian. judgment for plaintiff on note for $123.
 In each of these cases suit was brought by c. H. Stevenson the receiver of the banking institution.
 TODAY'S CALENDAR: No. 15013-C. E. Edwards. transferee. etc, vs. Kansas City Memphis and Bir- mingham railroad; appeal by defendk ant.
 No. 1628O-Mary J. Tomerlin vs Thomas Buchanan; appeal by plaintiff.
 No T Do luna Na Inhn R. Haslam; garnishment.
 No 162S2Henry Davis vs Southern railway; common law certiorari
 No. 16295-John W. Gum vs. A. E. Riddle; assumpsit
 No. 16296-G. w. Gabbert vs. A. J. Krebs company; damages.
 No 16305-Robertson Grocery company vs. Brown Bros; troyer
 No. 163o9-Tennessee Coal, Iron and
 
 to the people of Birmingham first class postmaster"
 Drennen Favors Carter.
 Mayor Drennen. who has just returned from Washington, Is ardently in favor of MT. Carter.
 Persons in Washington who arc In position to know" said the Mayor" ad- vised me that there will be vacancy in the postmastership here. I take It that the appointment will naturally go to a | republican. That being the case, l favor the best man for the place that can be found in the republican ranks.
 "I b slieve that man to be J. Rivers 1 Carter. I have known him and admired 1 him fifteen years His character and abil- ity are unquestioned, and what Is equally I important, his personality is highly sat isfactory to the people here of all parties and all classes.
 "An Attractive Personage.'
 MT. Carter Is, as everyone knows an estimable gentleman. He has been tested. The people know him. They like him. So- cailly. he is one of the most attractive personages of the town. With MT. Car l fer as postmaster, the Roosevelt admin ,stration would have in Birmingham an of cial in whom all citizens here would take pride. I sincerely hope Mr. Carter will get the appointment" |