The Montgomery advertiser., 1905-09-24

regulations would soon dwarf the rec. Sn of s of the who is asked to subscribe. money to a
 Die Die s wili IF probably irst desire to sstis- fy themselves upon this score bafore entering extensively into the plan.
 i would lie ' to ec recover money Subscribed for cotton speculation, not contemplat- ing the actual delivery of the. proper
 as Hsnes HRses fsanfsa ss fsatSfs sw Sa may ns we be dismissed,
 Let the people who are. oonsidering fhe the south neeSse eeSe1s0R sns sue cs'ts campaign ss pfoftabie prices for cotton does not
 late IH money o with shdorys Which T to force the size of the. crop and trade conditiens suliy intimates, prices wifi advance in time without the expenditure he pro
 and if t Is 9se F tss tyRsS wysS css sSs cotton when the facts become known
 sir suiiy States that what accom- and viii do again. etc. By eleven. srd1, wsil rssm,smSsrsd: gs by sWhish nSlaess ss suiiys operations. The country was
 lasiom Issnnsr went @ . 1n in Ia an unprscsasntsd qusnces have not been forgotten. These
 nigh prices not only had the, effect of
 which hey no ntS SSt the m created a great desire to plant cotton. Sales The conseaUences onSe ssre of this cline in prices to nearly six cents with for future growth unless steps to ob- tnis result were taken. And for a
 share of this the trade also owe sul- The decline in prices as a result. of disfss.s fhfew the planters of the scrth
 calamity among. the Engiish by the
 TSe cry for hsip wss 'ns souSssa S wsT nr
 ssem sfT FSn Ssn fses ses sts5 5r tion of the prevlous season had come. and there was nothing ahead save nnis- cry, gloom and misfortune: From one coaditions con a were known nov n and md upon upon Sns us,
 rsssounSss' vHtI Hhd 1t was hssrd 3ss sronnd the cotton planters of the South at thiss critical time? Where were the pool
 yssrs of the men Who no@ s tSe 1 value of their product smashed and it's | immediate future doomed? It remain | ed for the South to restore herself. Leadership was forthcoming to tnfiu-
 ence a sufficient acreage reduction to
 reduce production within the bounds property, rather than a drug upon the | market, assures planters a reasonable return for their labors in euIttvating 1 it. We all know where the money came from which made the acreage re- duction movement a success, assured
 rsasopasis prices nand and SIsgssllssd daash. asn piness and encouragement now prevails among the cotton planters, who. have prospects for satisfactory marketing or their crop this season.
 In the light of the past we nok ask Mir. Sully in all candor, do you say and two years ago. believe I can and VII past. the conditions as they exist.
 knowledge at my command ana In the light of the past now ask from which you have just been de- livered through the wise and heroic efforts of your fellow citizens, do you cotton planters and merchants, want the dose you got year ago?
 working harmoniously, with the pFos- pect of marketing their crops at satis- factory prices. They have a right to expect the fullest prices warranted ny tions that influence the market. These prices will be insisted upon. buS when our farmers combine to work squeeze they become engaged n puel- ness wrong in principle, with its disas- trous consequences surely ahead