Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1905-06-01
ACTING MAYOR CASTS VOTE.
Mayors Request 10 Defer ActIon In
The Matter Totally lguorsd--TeN
OF Ordinance


dnOnco which has been agreed upon by
a majority Of tho committee having
the same under consideration ana has
been reported TO the council A caucuS
Of the eight members was held just he.
fore the council meeting, at which q
plan ~ action waH 1groed upon Those
who participated IN the Same are A. j.
Davis Martin, Dean Wood, Holiday
Nouhausen, Black ana liartonstgln
They decided 10 have the substitute
road ana published 30 that II could be
considered nj the meeting Monday
night The program wnH carried ont nv
planned ana the substitute ordnance W
now IN the hands NJ city AllN DcE
Monday night Az he drew UP the orr
dlnnnco there IN no doubt Az to his re.
port being favorable ana II only ne.
mains 10 be seen whothor or not the
eight mombcrs win put n through NJ
tho meeting next Monday night
RIGHT on DAVIS TO VOTE,
After some minor matters had been
passed upon by the council BLACK
moved that the rules be suspended and
tho franchise be taken Np, The motion
was carried by vote Of : 20 3, Tuddcn.
ham, preoco ana Hewlett voting against
n and Fornsirom lc VI Davis, Barnes
ana Wells being absent Before an.
nounolng the vote President Hewlett
raised the question ~ 10 the right of
A. \, Davis TO vote he now being mayor
pro tom Mr. Davis submitted an opln-
lon from the city attorney on thAi point
which held that he had The right to
vote,
Tuddcnhnm declared that thoro wns
no doubt M TO Mr. Davis legal right
10 vote, but he did not think ho had
Il moral right 20 vote on questions
which havo 10 40 10 him for anal ap.
prevail lie said that n he were acting
mnyor he would not 10 such thlng.
After the matter had been settled ana
Mr. DAVIS vote was counted ana tho
council was about 10 consider the iran.
cllso. ruddcnhnm raised an objection 10
the consideration of tho franchise, llo
enld that Mayor Morris had requested
tho council not 10 take action on tho
franchise during his absence and he
thought tho request should be granted
BLACK GIFTS BUSY,
MACK proceeded TO Introduce the sub.
eliluto ordinance and In introducing
dallying long enough over the matter
ana II should bo disposed OF lie said
that the substitute embodied many
features OF the ordinance submitted by
the committee, aud that Il also safe
guards the Interests OF the city Hare
tonsloln said that no favored having
tho ordinance read and referred 10 a
committee, ana that each member OF
the council be given an opportunity 10
i,ad ana consider H. llo stated that
no wanted 10 10 The right thing In the
matter and glyo everyone chance 10
make any objections or amendments
they desired, Wood stated that he
was OF the same opinion M lialtenstolg
and favored having II read ana re-
furrod, Black said mat II was not the
intention Of the majority TO take snap
Judgment ON the members of tho coun-
ell who were not present and pass tho
substitute ordinance, All he wanted
was 10 have u read and published no
the public could know It's contents ana
ihcn take II M for nnal consideration
Monday night,
TEXT or SUBSTITUTE,
The substitute was then road and,
upon motion OF proecc was referred
10 the city attorney with Instructions
Ia report Of tho noSt meeting Of the
council, The ordinance follows IN fun.
An ordinance ratlfylng and confirm
lng tho transfer OF franchises 10 Utah
Light and Railway company a corpora
ton, extending the life OF said fran.
chisos ana amending tho same,
lio II ordained by tho CITY Council OF
SAT- Lake city, Utah
Section |, That all the franchises of
Ctah Light ana Railway company a
corporation organiscd and eSaling I'm.
der tho lava Of Utah, said frunohlucs
being,
IA franchise 10 tho Sail Lake s.
ogden Gas ana Electric Light company.
under date OF May 90 1893,
IA franchise granted by Salt Lake
cry TO Robert NJ, Jones' July 20, 1893,
lll--A franchise granted by salt
Lake CITY 90 \, H. Wnlkor Dec, 10, 1893,
IVA franchise granted by Salt
Lake CITY TO Pioneer Electric Power
company May ~, 1897
VA franchise granted by Salt Lako
city 10 Salt Lake Clly Railroad com.
puny Jan. 20, 1880
VIA franchise granted by Salt
Lake CITY 20 salt Lake Clty Railroad
company Feb, H. 1890
NIl-A franchise granted by Salt
Lake CITY tO SDlt Lake Clty Railroad
company May 90 1890
YIN "A franchise granted by Salt
Lake Clty 10 salt Lake Clty Railroad
company May 8, 1894
INA franchise granted hy Palt
Lake city 90 Salt Lake city Railroad
company, sept \, 1894,
y a franchise granted by Salt Lake
Guy TO SAT- Lake city Railroad com.
pRny Nov, a. 1891,
MA franchise granted by Salt
Lnko city "a H. G, Hamilton, Jan, 90,
1891
Nll--A franchise grantod by snlt
Lake Clty 90 Salt Lake city Railroad
company May 3, 1903,
Kill "A franchise gmnlod by Snlt
Lake cry to salt Lake cry Railroad
company Aprll 49, 1893,
NlY-.A franchise granted by Salt
Lake city to Salt Lake CITY Railroad
company May 90, lsOp,
WA franchise granted by Salt
Lake city 10 Salt Lake CITY Railroad
company oct s, 1900,
XVI "A franchise granted by salt
Lake CITY To Salt Lake CITY Railroad
company March "a, 1901,
XVlla-A franchise granted by salt
lalto CITY TO salt Lake Rapid Transit
COMPANY Feb, II, 1890,
NVlllaA franchise granted by Salt
Lake CITY 70 salt Lako Rapid Transit
company April 2?, 1890
NINA franchise granted by salt
Lake CITY TO salt Lake Rapid Transit
company May g. 1890,
MA franchise franted by Rat
Lake city to salt Lake Rapid Transit
company April ~, 1894, which latter
franchise Nlto confirms u transfer 10
raid Salt Lake Rapid Transit company
Of franchise granted TO Popporton