The San Francisco call., 1905-08-05

the Sd Of July that l met DR.. Brasch on
the street and he told me that he had a
license.
" 'How's that?' / asked him, for l knew
that as he was not a graduate from a
recognized institution nor had he passed
the required time under a teacher, so
that he was not eligible to take the ex-
aminations. What! Is it possible that
you have a license, when you told me
yourself that you were not eligible?'
DUG UP TO THE BOARD.
Sure he said to me- That's easy |
merely dug up to the State board at the
same time making. a motion with his
hand as of some one taking money, and
l got 1T all right He told me that Gov
ernor Pardee and two others wrote to
the board and that he fixed it all right
by digging up. He told me that he went
to DR.. Dunn and that DR.. Dunn gave him
the temporary license.
"A few days later 1 stepped into his Of
fee on the way to pay my annual fee for
the renewal Of the license, and 1 asked
him to let me see the license that was
granted him by DR.. Dunn. L have it at
my house. he told me.
Are you going to renew it 1 asked
No, what's the use. l am not afraid
of the board. -
When DR.. Brasch was summoned and
sworn before the commission at the
beginning of the afternoon session the
sensation that he was expected to give
out did not materiaIize. just before he
received the summons to appear before
the commission he stated to few
newspaper men that he had given 800
to DIR. Coke for DIR. Dunn, but on the
stand he denied this in toto.
Brasch Swore that he had only given
DR.. Dunn the lawful S. and that he had
paid no one else money to be given to
that or any other member of the board
He had also paid the lawful examination
fee of $25. He denied that he had told
DR.. Hullinger that he had dug up" to
the board or that there was any irregu-
larity in the granting of his temporary
license. He admitted that 1t was DR..
Dunn To whom he had talked, but main
tained that he had paid nothing that was
not strictly honest on the part of both
men.
1t was at this point that Attorney
Braun rose and told the commission that
he had evidence to prove that Dr. Brasch
had paid 500 to DR.. Coke for DR.. Dunn
and that DR.. Dunn had received the
money.
DUNN DENIES IRREGULARITY.
DIR. Dunn emphatically- denies that he
was guilty of any irregularity in his ac-
ary license, but that he did it according
to law. when DIR. Brasch came to me-"
said DR.. Dunn, "apd asked me to grant
him temporary license, l asked him to
show me his affidayits. He did so, but
even then / did not want to take the
responsibility, and l took them to the
Attorney General of the State and to
our own attorney. The Attorney General
told me that ii was my duty to grant
the temporary license until the examina-
tions were given, and | gave it. 1t was
to expire at that time. L only received
the IS that the law allows and that was
absolutely ALL
There was little other testimony of inf-
portance before the board yesterday Dr.
l. s. Minor swore that he saw DR.. Dunn
talking to his. young office assistant Dr.
Papandre, in the hall of the college build
ing 1t was just before the anatomy ex-
animation. DIR. Dunn had a paper in his
hand and was talking earnestly to Papan-
Dire, so the witness stated. He backed
up the statements made by DR.. O'ConnelI
on Thursday, when the latter testified
that Papandre came into the room and
gave them three, and a part of the fourth
questions in anatomy before DR.. May
hew, who was conducting the examina-
tion wrote the questions on the board
He was the only other witness who had
heard Papandre give the questions
DR.. A. d. de Martin stated to the COM
mission that he had received a list Of
questions from DR.. Howard before the
examination in anatomy and that they
were so general in their nature that they
covered a few of the questions given in