The Birmingham age-herald. [volume] (Birmingham, Ala.) 1902-1950, 1905-01-24
City Court of Birmingham.


guson presiding:
The case of John Cooke, administrator
of the estate of Justin Cooke, deceased.
Is on trial. The Plaintiff sues for $4,000
as damages for the oeath of his son. 1t
Is alleged In the bill of complaint that
the intestate met his death on the cor
ner of Avenue @ and Twentieth street
by being run over by an electric car
some time ago The plaintiff has eight
attorneys and the defendant one.
The case of Partnenia Miller VS.. the
Alabama Great Southern raNoad result
ed in a judgment for plaintiff for $3.50
by agreement.
The case of Leroy Hystein VS.. the Bir-
mingham Railway, Light and Power COM
pan resulted In judgment for the plant
If for 5000 by agreement
The case of Emily Barnett VS.. the Bir-
mingham Railway, Light and Power COM
pany resulted in Judgement for the
plaintiff for $50 by agreement.
The case of Hall Llndabarger VS.. Israel
and Laura T. Townsend was dismissed
for want Of prosecution.
Juries were organized in the city court
j. NJ. Franklin of precinct No. "a.
farmer; e. A. Lynch of precinct No. 80,
carpenter; j. b. Harrison of precinct No.
"a, conductor; D. II. lay of precinct No.
as contractor; w. G. Orme of precinct
No 20, machinist; d. c. Johnston of pre-
cinct No IL. machinist; r. e. McGrady
of precinct No. a6 engineer; w. f. Ep-
person of precinct No. As, brickmason
w. S. Going, Sir, of precinct No. 81,
gardener; C. B. Ratllff of precinct No.
81 contractor; W. J. Lindsay of precinct
No II, farmer; w. s. Bridges of precinct
No As, bookkeeper; d. u. Williams of
precinct No. 81, rolling mil man; w. III.
Iovins of precinct No. "a. watchman; Gus
Lee of precinct No. 81, purchasing agent
Jack Biddle of precinct No. "a. machinist;
W. A. Lavender of precinct No. 10, clerk;
n w. Daily of precinct No. 10, clerk;
John Dillon of precinct No. 8, real estate
agent; ]. w. Dial of precinct No. FL rail-
road man; A. W. 4llens of precinct No.
q, collector; w B., Williams of precinct
No 20. foreman; Henry Hall of precinct
No 46, railroad man.
Today's Docket.
No. 14701-Louis Darby VS.. Birmingham
Railway, Light and Power company;
damages. Attorneys, Vaughan 81 David
son. Hugh Morrow.
No, 1470S-J. w. Roberts VS.. western
Union Telegraph company damages. At
torneys Frank S. White & Sons; Camp
bell & Morrow.
No. 144s9-B. o. watkins VS.. Sarah M.
Burgany; assumpsit. Attorneys, j. ii.
Miller; Ward & Houghton.
| No 1860. ]. Barton VS.. National
Chemical company and others; appeal by
defendant. Attorneys, b. M. Allen; Ru-
dulph & Huddleston.
No. 1469O-John G. Baton VS.. Birming-
ham Railway. Light and Power COM
pany; damages Attorneys, Bowman,
Harsh & Beddow; Hugh Morrow.
No 1434O-G. Miller VS.. Sloss Iron and
Steel company. Attorneys, J. w. Bush;
Tflman, Grub, Bradley & Morrow.
| Today's docket in second division:
No 1S9t4-Thomas M. Harvill VS.. Louis
VILE and Nashville railroad company and
others; damages. Attorneys, benson &
JITlman; w. l. Grub.
NO 1s920-August Roussel VS.. Tennessee
Coal Iron and Railroad company; dam
ages. Attorneys, Arthur L. Brown;
| Walker Percy.
No 13444-J. F. Burgess VS.. Kansas City.
Memphis and Birmingham Railroad COM
pany; damages. Attorneys. Lane and
White; Campbell and Walker.
No. 13565-J. II. Yagar VS.. w. II. Bar
nard; damages; ]. B. Arid; ]. S. Ken
needy.
No. 14045-B. B. Conner VS.. e. N.
Downey; ejectment Attorneys. Altman
& Altman; Frank S. White & Sons.
! No. 141S0-J. C. Murray VS.. Birmingham
Railway. Light and Power company;
damages. Attorneys Frank s. White e.
Sons. Hugh Morrow