New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1905-10-10
GOULD WINS SKIRNl>H il.
Continued from first page.

is known to me only By hearsay' as l uio
see them. How that evidence eaine -
rnitted / do not understand ...
Concerning the withdrawal OF the
t,,ot Mr. RAMSEY filed last Saturday ana III
-, - vas sought to have three new lnspeo-
1.,oi,,ted for the election Judge Doyle Is
quoted as saying:
II anpeafed to me early that the one e mop tbsy
- ,'a attorneys was TO delay. and tnat Ln .
so,,oht to so handle the suit tnat Wns 4,a5 wv,
ing was going on tomorrow we tf raorning they
In corrt All Saturday and TINS mo- ,iitia for
reda sneeches and brought up tecn. 80 e,et
tbis nnrpose Then too, they were alAi i,no Ia
the ia names put on my ainaiint.' tiS mn in
ner cent of the stock with us oe those
epourt and with them in possesslon VI tbaJ
1es thew would have had things a. az +he
wanted them and simply ala nb 1I advices that
&c Rod lost in ST Louis saw there was 10 NJ 800
fooling with this suit and SIMPLY ash00
it withdrawn 4t.s
nos much excitement in court TINS
morning. and the legal pyToteenniC ZEE made
tbe hair raising variety ChalseS asent was
III 18th 9th sides that the right to represent ~
Snolline and hot words were the TuIe. ~ con-
IEhan adjournment was made there We - Of
w hIn ~ q scene when Clarence Brown, %
1 1s,,Id forces tried to get the athdaElt NJ,
should have been left in the court JUG 4s1Iing
oiio- "A - and refused to give II up =,
poeketea -; al thew would get it when he sa"
fit to give it to them
FIRST SETBACK FOR RAMSEY.
60 or;s oct 9-In the ST. Louis Circuit
CT today Judge Daniel G. Taylor denied eie
ov,r,ica tion of Joseph Ramsey, IT, the
-a.,aon+ of the Wabash Railroad 1or an III
.. restrain the Missouri Paclnc anu
-, mountain roads, trustees noth No'e
vrohash stock held by or for those roauS ~ Inc
ral wabash election, to De helu ~
tomorrow. ,uuo,,,,ed at once
News of the decision was teiegrapneu = -
.. ro,edo where George j. Gould ana ms sup
- I'D Mr. Ramsey and mis- personal ao-
-. MORO awaiting the decision Inc Iaiiul
-, ,.,,o+ion suit which, If successful "oula
+toa I'm large block of Gould STOCK u
zd as a most important victory loi eiO
ce,,Id interests Judge Taylor in his decision
said in part: r,..,.,aa
,,as-tifs contends that the Wabash Railroad
Company aa nGalef and Competing lines WITHIN the
meaning OF the provisions OF sees9 ~ saction 653
Oh the SSTssnnri statutes and hence Inat thS @
Ing of the securities OF the " aoaSi eaI and fhat
pany by as a the Missouri Pacific owns and contrO
all OF te of the Wabash securities by the Iron
Montain company is Illegal because ina. caiO md
eoae nv his bill filed herein to enjoin the x9rns
Of these securities at the e m 1 around that
fpev are Illegally owned, and will De yoIeS SO @
70 efissouri Pacific and Wabash companies IN
sTtsori through the operation Of these two eol-
pe5n 4Sbat h. as stockhoider in the Wabash COM
nary viii be injured thereby: ! -, bea,
faIi of fhe defendants VINO have appeared OF eeil
served disavow such illegal purpose ana ,Fhs
the good faith of the PLAINTIFFS application. ltS
court finds the record in TINS ease 10 Of
of the Missouri laws enacted for the pr9teJto %
the public that 1t has been ioath 10 feaoii INC 80
cIusions herein expressed - -. 1asf on
The record develops the fact that at the ldse ai
nuai election of the Wabash Railroad company aP NJ
tbe nIantiff Ramsey, holding the proxies OF IAe
then and now owners of these shares OF STOCK
the voting of which he now seeks TO hd t ar er
os whom he now charges will be elected and VIII
so conduct the property of the wabash [oau Ne
only to violate the provisions OF the laws u Ms
| souri, but also to injure him - .,at,+ies &c
I am of the view that this action OF plalntlH Is
| lief which he seeks in the absence OF PROOF snow
ing that something has transpired since Ine uIs
~ that the purposes OF those who will be
td nv the Voting Of this stock at the meeting
to be n ee fSe on elected By the plann
The plaintiff, by voting these very .Eat fhe.
xers the property of the Missouri Pacific RaiIway
| Sompanv and the Iron Mountain Railway Cem-
pa snysa or nerIons as directors of the wabash
many who were then in control OF a eompetng anu
a. tba court 10 enjon one else from dong
! the verv thing which he himself has done: -
10 The court Is TO conclude that the holdieS OF tee
wdb eng by the Missouri Pacific and the 81 Lou
! 1ran Mountain and Southern is HeSal. ~ mus
conclude that it was III e f a It's ac9ustion ana
tbs+ the paintfm in this case. not only kneW anu
aequesced in this unlawful noadn o 90 oui th
s ga1 out of this illegal ownership
There Is evidence In TINS case tAat Sns ols
/ the Wabash stockholders. In the future than that
which has been pursued under the 2antIn dire
/ ~ nlaintin he cannot be now heard 70 complain,
for he is the position OF suitor Tor equltaDie
| relief who comes into court innocent and injured
4