Willmar tribune. [volume] (Willmar, Minn.) 1895-1931, 1905-10-11

pay ment Tor computing scales refused
by the defendants. The platnt' ifs are
q scale manufacturing firm OF Detroit,
Mich. Judgment was rendered in ia
vor Of the plaintiffs. Attorneys, T
o. Gilbert for plaintiffs and John NJ:
Downs and Samuel Porter for defend
ants. The other action Was one
brought to recover four months wag-
g.. Plaintiff claimed that alter work
ing three months and ten days he Wa
anlawful]y discharged. The courts
findings were that he was not dis
charged and judgment for three
months, wages was ordered. The de-
sendart is q farmer residing in Harri-
son. = Samuel Porter appeared for the
plaintiff and T. o. Gilbert for the de-
PENDANT.
All of Wednesday was occupied with
the case of W. A. Erickson vs.. Town
# Roseland. This was suit In which
he plaintiff sought to recover an
amount claimed to be due for services
In building q culvert. The amount
.ued for was 80 so and Judgment was
ordered in the sum Of three dollars.
Many witnesses were present, includ-
Ing all Of the town Supervisors. Atty.
J. J. ShoreRge of Olivia appeared for
he plaintiff and Charles johnson for
the defendant. -. s==s.z = T.. !.
Thursday morning the case OF O. 81.
Westberg W. s. E. Stapsberry came
70 trial. This action WAS brought to
recover two months rental claimed to
be due for building formerly occupied
~ the Willmar Provision Co Plain.
III claimed that there WAS an oral
lease for the building for two months
after the above company had ceased
% occupy It. The case was taken un-
der advisement. Geo. r.. Bitterness
vas the plaintiff . attorney and Sam.
uel Porter the defend ants. K. zsa..:..
A case that Was called but in which
the parties had settled before coming
TO court was that of Q. Fl. Westberf
W. w. r. TAFT. :..<. -.
On Friday afternoon the case Il
VIM G.. Carney vs.. John Thiesen &C.
cupied the attention of the court. This
was called on Tuesday morning bu,
was adjourned to Friday st 2 o'clock
Both of the litfgants are Raymond
parties. The action was brought ia
recover amount claimed to be due TO-
work In digging . we'll on defendant
farm In Lone Tree township The
amount sued for was $25 and coun
ter claim was put In for damage q
The defendant secured judgment
against the plaintiff In the sum of S8;
and costs. The plaintiffs attorney
VS. Samuel Pointer and N. E. Ericsor
and Geo. 81. Bitterness appeared TO,
| tho defendant. AZ -, H..
The following cases were continued
TO Z special term to be held Oct. IL: I
ChickeriDg- Chase Bros. Co. We - F.
w. Segerstrom. The action is brough
to recover payment on . .promfssOr,
note. Chas. johnson is retained al
p aintiff's attorney. No attorney ap
peared for the defend ant. :. -
Peter Nelson vs.. Even Railson
Action brought to recover amount
due the plaintiff for professional ser
vices as veterinary surgeon Atty T.
and Chas. johnson Tor the defend ant
Downs; City Of Willmar, Garnishee
This 10 an action brought to recove,
payment on merchandise sold to de-
PENDANT Downs TO the amount Of 936 IS
A question o. to the legality OF "a 20
Segment to the Kandiyohi Co Banl
Of the defendants wages due from tht
city was Z point: at issue. Geo. 81
Otterness 10 the attorney for the p' ala.
till and Samuel Porter for the city.
Carl g. Farmer vs.. Marcus Olson
Duluth Elevator Co. and Cara i'll E g
VISITOR Co. Garniehees. Action TO re
cover sum Of el65 So for merch andise
The following cases are continued
to the next general term, to be heli
Nov. L: .=. + 4 I. ]. &. .. .s5z .
KabO Corset Co W. Ssmuelson &
Thompson. Suit brought 70 recove,
mount due for merchandise. H T. O
Gilbert attorney for plaintiff anC
Chas. Johnson for defend ant. B. 81
Christian M Johnson vs. 81. F. Ras
muesOD and Nels Rasmussen. Plain
lti1 sues to recover amount claimed X
be due for labor % carpenter On de
PENDANTS farm northweet nf Wjllmar
Tho amount sued for is 9l21. 60 and ID
terest. 5S,*#@ RI \. s=s. ....