The Guthrie daily leader. [volume] (Guthrie, Okla.) 1893-1996, 1905-01-27

whc-a he ccdrel &c paced.
Baiunger supported Lydick. saying
1t was local with tho people OF those
townships and the rest Of the territory
shop,d not interfere
Mr. Maxwell seconded tAe Lyiick
amendment, saying Or Allen, che fed
eral inspector. had soid him The Ths
could he better protected n NOT on the
river.
NJ. Lylick SAID me quarantine line
in Cleveund county had always been
farce and that ne could inspect in
fofiy-eisht aours time more cattle
than had ever oso7 Inspected At euVe
celg and Lexington.
Dl- walker msis.ed lUspecicfs n1d
told him the line shcpl6 be a'olg she
rive. ana ne insisted OF the original
/. bill
Nr Taylor supI orte3 Lydick ba
rause Il was purely q iocoi matter.
rydicks amendment duaiy cafrie.
Thy almost q unanimous vote.
fstfiN eaflei' ltftetits
Mr. Ferris stated that as now locat-
e0 the line cuts ComantHe county in
lwain about siA miles south Of Law
ton. thus iniu,ing Lawton as oatt'c
market. and stated ne IS opposed to-
the lmc remaining in this condition.
Mr. lydirk supported him in the mat
Ser stating It 20 be another local ques-
ticn with ths people OF Comanche
county.
Mr. Ballinger then moved that the
bill be made special orcers for next
Thursday afternoon a; two o'clock
/ and en- second by bryan the motion
carried; a satisfactory hill will be ar-
ranged in the meantime.
FulIers Probate Judge Gill.
The quarantine bill going over the
probate Judge bill by Fuller Okla
homa county. VAS again taken
Mr. Logan believed The bill ga. the
judges too many fees anc moved to
cut out certain lines which provides
Tor the fees. Mr. Fuller believed such
action unnecessary as the provisions
were paced in the biz to aid the
smaller counties in maintaining the
ofice propeIy. Mr. Ross and Mr..
! Bryan favored Logan in the matter
aad the amendment carried.
Mr.. Ferris moved to strike out the
Hines giving The judge additional clerk
hire and made a strong speech in sup
port of his motion. saying the bill gave
the Judge himself $500 additional sal
airy and his elerl, $500 additional
These figures Mr.. Ferris disapIroved.
Both Mr.. 3rvan AID Mr.. Fuller talk
ed against the Ferris amendment,
stating that in the larger counties al.
diticnal clerk hire would be necessary
under the pending bill which gives the
probate judges so many additional
Guics
Mr. Levy of Logan. supported Full
er, stating that in this county the adj
6itional clerk hire would De necessary
under this bill.
Mr. Bryan explained that the lines.
referred to by Ferris, 10 not make the
hiring Of additional clerks compulsory,
simply optional when necessary.
Mr. Maxwell said two years ago a
bill was passed increasing the salaries
Of probate judges; therefore he favor.
ed the Ferris amendment. saying
whenever an opportunity to employ
more clerks is given, all officials as
ne take advantage OF it,
Mr. Fuller stated the additional clerk
hire is needed in Oldanoma county;
lunier tie present law the clerk re-
colves but s40c per annum. and it is
Z necessary for the judge to pay the
clerk an additional S4eO He said he
was not afraid to leave the matter with
the commissioners OF MS county. for 1t
always lies with Them under hiF meas
TIE 10 decide whether the additional
clerks shall he employed.
On vote. however. the Terris
amendment carried. 10 to s.
Bal'inner Finds Fault.
+, Mr. Ba alinger and Mr.. Noftsinger
lound fault With Tie onl because It
failed to state where 4he SIS per day
Sor probate court stencg:aphegs IS 10
como from. They stated the employ
ment OF stenographers would mean
81 800 per year # the bill passed and
must be stood by the counties. They
favored the bill but cesirtd to have