Weekly Arizona journal-miner., 1905-07-05
TREASURER WRIGHT'S
BOND IN JEOPARDY


telegram was addressed Sinclair
the board behind closed DOORS and the
ton has been made to keep the matter secret
Immediate reply made in the form OF tempozng asking
slider withdrawal by wire but such withdrawal must be made in
duly legal and formal manner
with reference the Wright bond the proposed withdrawal Of his
surety and only because Wghts endeavor
bond that the information has become public.
The fact that the surety has notified the board OF
pevisors its intention withdraw his bond has
few the inside from the day the telegram delivered
probable action of the board in this but certain
that unless good be shown for the withdrawal of the
bonding company, formal release will consented
of the county 100000,
dawa of the surety and for the that there
has been action taken other than reply to the first telegram the
to date has not been made public.
District Attorney Einwood called pass upon first
dictated reply by legality with
dawal question but be learned days
required part surety company
obligation which been paid
Despite careful inquiry nothing be learned which might
Wghts of board supervisors
who have been questioned this point decline talk and refuse
discuss the matter
One explanation that the from which Wright secured
shall file the appointment OF its statutory agent with every
territory The Aena had not done this and subject
this and believed that the surety be
came alarmed and wanted to get under
Should become necessary for Wright to furnish new bond
advice of the district attorney the board
after having declared the office hse of lack
This bond must pass through the
at the time of the filing of the original instrument
Dame busy the monied class of the city wit
Sing the chances of Wright being able to new ho
surety
through Surety company will be able upon second
similar bond from some other company:
On the contrary Mr. Wright that he already prepared
file new bond within twenour hours in the that the
company succeeds its plan become released from its obligation
representative Journal company
he complete surprise to him. explained that
law Surety company before being allowed withdraw from
bond this file affidavit stating and
/ ten days notice. This has not been done
Upon receiving the telegram few days from the Aetna In
steps upon company
plying with its To verify his he for Mr.
bring with him the Geographic correspondence that had
the company and Hammond acting attorney for Wright
The first telegram sent direct Wright and dated June
1--WE withdrawing from county
file bond Immediately Otherwise will file petition for
lease.-Aena Indemnity CO.
Am prepared file bond
return of $a5 and all incident bond Your
R35Ss ss"'" "sNs"s''-A Hammond attorney Tor E :
pon receiving evidence of bond being filed you will
receive check for proper rebate of premium
On the following day another received from the Aetna
people which
The permits retiring public officials any
time Isl best without Uneaned
premium will be returned"
Attorney Hammond then wired:
My client, after paid bond
relation year you withdrawing
/ without Court all inquiry investigation
The above July and nothing has been
heard from it, Mr. Hammond of the opinion that company
decided to let the drop
If this Withdrawing from its bonds the territory
said Mr. Wright it sure to have number OF law suits its
hands Not only it reflection public official but it
hardship and expense be compelled go
securing bond
IF the company running bluff added
mond why has filed its affidavit recting
desire withdraw We intend Fold the company
possible but can't DO have
made to file a bond within invent, -four hours.
escape