The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1905-04-25
MISS BEAMY WAS CLEVER.
d. PERCY Moan SAYSSHE KNEW
THE WHOLOF SHAKESPEARE.

would Not Have STATED to Take Her In
HIS HunAboul He Had Had q ChAnoe
Declares hNeVer Excluded any
body From Home Except One.
The separation SUI tho D. Percy Nor
gans was oonoNaeoesterday 90 far as
the testimony goes.ustioe KeoRh will
decide II after the Aera subpnit briefs
three weeks hence. G. Cnvler Morgan A.
Co. and rudolph n M, brother-in-hw
OF the defendant, IN 'nts ginning of yes
tsrday's proceedings, q testimony re-
garding the allegation etsbonesty. Mr..
CuyleT said:
sMr. Morgan had acooG With INV Arm
for four years. One was tt,tata Account
lno wn as No. / and the 9TH, aocountof
his m ther and his brother \, WA known
as account No. 2. There watIver a deAoit
In account No. and II conNsd when IL
left us, about $500, 900. beside ! verv heat
investment securities. There bar vssanv
SPECULATION with account Nc, Tbere
was with the other, but that ott aooo,rnt
had appreciated 'l'o'OOO "nen Tvs trans
ferred.'
Mr.. Kissel said that he succetd NJ
Morgan az trustee Of the d. P. organ
estate and made a thorough eXAnation
of the mana cement OF It under Mr.. Mean.
He said there had never been loss tie
estate. but that Mr.. Morgan turnedver
a much larger amount than Lad been
trusted to him. Not only had he gone "
the accounts himself, but he had bad
expert accountant do likewise.
Mr.. Wellman then put John E Parsons /
the stand and placed In evidence this le tie
HOTEL SEVILLE. Dec. 10. 1902
MI DEAR PERCY: Our conversation m
morning Tenews my anxiety IL makes
feel that II you would ny TO recover Tor q
past losses by new dealings, that this wou
continue as long az anything was lett, y,
discriminate between verbal and wrht'
promises / think you should write me tn
YOU will never a. gain be interested in dealin
In stocks, and par icularly that you will ha
nothing 70 do with Sugar stock, IL II
that your dealings with tho money and secul
eState was with their knowledge and +
their account, II would seem TO me that 20
duty TO your family forbids you to assun
nae quite surprised at your stateme
that Edith had been in large part repal
on what you had told me / had told NJ
Lord that thought Il reasonable that ~
%ilIinF. And n you have an Interest
SIOo 900 IN the Portland block. and ! thiJ
YOU said 81, 900 In another building, It seen
family NV Consider seriously before giving In
up, II Il be that you are not liable TO yol
'"'e' OF "'0'us'' s.E.P.
This question was then put to Mr.. Parson
sIf YOU thought Mr.. Morgan was di
honest would you have asked him 70 NAL
over property TO your daughter3'
Il thought he had specialized In tru
funds, was the Response.
Would you ask him to make over b
property II you thought he had lost o the
peoples f(lnds7'
thought he should protect his wife.
Mr.. Morgan, recalled. substantiated h
previous testimony oonoe ming the az
ouracy Of his accounts and the care b
exercised In difie rentiRting the affaiI
Of the two estates in his charge. Mr. Tai
then became inquisitive about his relation
With Miss Bellamy and he replied:
L never went 10 a saloon with Miss Be
lamy and never have / taken her out in
runa bout. She was commuter, as / wa
and met her on the trains. She was
very attractive and a wonde nully oleve
pe rson. She knew the whole Of Shake
speare and almost all OF Browning.
wouldn't have hesitated TO take her out
q r1inabout II l had had q chance"
In regard TO Mrs. Southland, Mr.. Morga
said that be had me her sister, Mrs. Butle
meeting the two women on the street,
walked along with them for a block o
two. Asked conoe ming the woman wit
him In the Manhattan Hotel at the tim
Mrs. Morgan dropped in for lunch, be In
sisted that he did mo- know her name.
Two other questions Mr.. Morgan n
fused 10 answer. Mr.. Taft asked hiI
who made him resign az trustee OF hi
fathers estate.
THAT person there said the " tines
pointing at Mr.. Parsons.
What influence did he bring to bes
upon your
I think we had better not 60 into that
said the witness, recovering his composur
Mr.. Taft did not pursue the questioning.
Again he was asked
you cannot deny that you exclude
your wife's friends from your homer
i never excluded anybody said NJ
Morgan emphatically, except one perso
and ! did that because thought II for u
good Of my family. think we had bett,
drop this subject
There was no more questioning alon
this line and the examination conclude
with further details Of financial transat
tons, none OF which affected the testimoI
previously adduced.