The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1905-10-09

W. W. Samson. Il didn't sign the
petition for several reason. In the
first place It looks to me like a Sunday
edition win add so many more sub
scrlbers to the Journal that the boys
win be more than repaid for the loss
and trouble. want the Sunday Jour
nal
NJ L. Cox: my wire signed the PEI
tition without considering it and now
wishes that she had not.2
Ben Diment merchant: Il signed
the petition without understanding the
matter in controversy. Now that I
have heard both sides I want my name
taken off the list of signers."
J. c. Elliott Il signed the petition
without understanding the situation
and I want my name taken of"
H T. Grow: "I did not sign the
! petition as I do not consider that I
should get into other peoples bust
ness
A. H. Hagen, Novelty theater. 81
refused to sign the carriers petition.
I could see no good reason why I
should be asked to sign it.
DR.. J. H soleclzi: q did not sign
the petition and would not"
Clarence Scott. Cremerie restaurant:
/ Il should say not / could see no rea-
son on earth why I should sign a petit
4 ton of that character. Mr.. MacLen-
4 nan probably understands how to run
his own business without advice from
me or from the carriers
T, L. King. city passenger agent
Santa F'e railroad: 81 did not sign
the carriers petition and would not.
/ feel that people should be permitted
to run their own business without
suggestions from those who know
nothing of it.2
A. T. Waggoner, druggist: at can
not understand what the boys hope to
gain by their petition and I did not
sign it,
| r. ". Harrison. county commission
er: 1.-THE Sunday edition of the Jour
nal strikes me as being just about the
right thing and while the petition was
not presented to me I should not have
signed it If it had BEEN"
Luther Frazier. salesman: mo,
did not sign the petition. If my name
! is on the list it was signed by my wife
L suppose"
E. D. Giles. merchant: NO, I would
not sign a petition of that nature and
any way it is not my fight"
0. A. Rosser, druggist: 81 did not
see the petition and 1 should not have
signed it if had"
L. NJ. Chiles. 1874 Van Buren,: .I
want my name withdrawn from seti-
1 ton"
VIII Rigdon. 1915 North Quincy:
Want my name taken from the peti-
ton. The Sunday edition is great"
3. r. Sim. druggist. says: Il think
r-=- 80
care what they do about it. I have
1 troubles of my own. However. that's
/ a, fine Sunday paperP the carrier ought
to be able to sell enough more to
make it pay"
]. I. sweezey: II want my name off
/ petition, have taken the paper Is years
/ and signed without thought, was busy.
I'm with the paper as any sensible per
son viii be-"
Mrs. c. B. futile. 1907 buchanan
wants name taken off petition.
w. E. sterne, county commissioner:
/ 1T strikes me that one cent is about
1 as cheap as paper like the State
/ Journal can be sold for at wholesale.
/ If the whole burden Is thrown on Mr..
MacLennan it viii prove pretty heavy.
I think the Sunday Journal is a fine
thing for all concerned"
R. S. Brigham: st did not get
chance to sign the petition, but would
not have done so if I had. I am a
great believer in letting Mr.. MacLen-
nan and any other man attend to his
/ own business. On that subject am a
crank. The Sunday newspaper is a
great thing for the town"
WE Logan: ct signed the petition,
but now I care nothing more about the
matter. was greatly pleased with
Sundays paper"
Lee Carter: 81 have troubles of my
own without getting into this carrier
rumpus. I guess the Journal can run
its own business. The Sunday paper is
a fine thing"
J. B. Larirer: 1.-The carriers made a
great mistake, think. They should
never have gotten into a legal contro-
versy. I am very much pleased with
/ the Sunday paper
Ned Osborn: IT signed the petition,
as people usually do. because It came
around. The fight itself is none of my
affairs. I was much taken with the
Sunday paper"
Capt. J. G. Waters: at is an outrage
/ that those boys are trying to tell Mr.
Mcclellan how to run his paper. 1
wouldn't stand Cor it If 7 were he.
am greatly pleased with the Sunday
/ edition. The State Journal is getting out
/ a mighty attractive paper"
J. J. Kinney: 81 never signed a pc
tition of that character. I suppose
that the women folks at the house
signed it for they are great on signing
petitions"
F. A Lewis, Union Pacific ticket
/ agent: mo, sir; I did not sign the
petition as I do not consider it a mat
ter subject to petition"
A. Demuth, merchant: 81 was not
asked to sign the petition and I should
not have considered it if I had been"
Harry Fraser, an old and valued car