The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1905-09-14
TERM Of
THE CIRCUIT COURT.
Was Opened Monday Morning BY Chief
Judge A. Hunter Boyd.
WHO CHARGED GRAND JURY
DR. James w. Laughlin, OF Mountain
Lake Park, is the Foreman Of That
BOdy-CiviI Cases.DispOSed OF.

ApOeg ~AFAa Sf-s3~DshCAo pOcCA OAH
On Monday the September Term Of
the Circuit Court for Garrett county
was opened by Chief Judge A. Hun
ter Boyd, of Cumberland, who arriv-
ed here from his home in that city
Monday morning. Tuesday morning
Judges Henderson and Keedy, who
arrived in Oakland from their respec-
tive homes the evening previous, APP
peared on the bench with the Chief
Justice.
DR.. James w. LaughIin, OF Noun
tain Lake Park, was appointed fore,
man Of the grand jury by Judge
Boyd, who drew the following men
to serve as his associates of that body:
Gustavus Stanton, William H. Byrd,
William II. Jacobs, Henry Witzgall,
M. NJ. Schrock, Frederick NJ. Bittin-
ger, Elmer K. Cross, d. w. Gilpin,
Thomas E. Bishoff, William g. Gar
ringer, Abraham c. Wotring, Cortez
H. Jennings, Franklin P. Arnold,
Ulysses S. Frazee, William Canty,
Isaac X. Paugh, George Giessman,
John Failinger, julius LittmaD,
James E. Lish, A. E. Boseley, A R.
Snedegar.
In his charge to the grand jury
Judge BOYD called special attention
to the violation of the liquor laws,
especially in those districts of the
county where the sale of liquor is
prohibited and urged upon the grand
jury to make diligent inquiry into
reports concerning the violation of
these laws. He suggested that the
grand jury in its report recommend
to the members of the Legislature
! from this county the passage OF o
more stringent liquor law modelled
upon the law now in force in Ale
gany county. He also suggested
that the jury recommend to the
| Maryland delegates in Congress the
repeal or amendment of the United
States law governing the granting of
! special licenses to parties to retail
liquor. He referred to the necessity
of tthe grand jury looking into all
violations of the game and fish laws,
the law against carrying concealed
weapons, abortions, the mining laws
! onH tho 1ntipc Of onnc+o hloe
Up to the hour of going to press
the following cases have been dispos-
ed of by the Court:
CIVIL APPEALS.
/. Peter Nathan VS.. J. S. Broad
water; continued; Hamill
2. Ira Culp VS.. Asa Humbertson;
judgment for appellee for $4S5O;
Heindel-Thayer.
80. Walter d. Collier VS.. A. T..
Glover; continued.
4. Marshall Reckard VS.. George G.
Schnapp; trial; motion to quash
granted; Renninger-Thayer, Hamill
5. w. p. Lee VS.. Mcmillan Lumber
Co.. tried before Court; Judgment
reversed and judgment of condemna-
ton issued; Renninger, Thayer, Sim
cell-Hamill, Semmes.
g. Same VS.. same; tried before
Court; judgment for Lee for $35; same
counsel.
7. w. G. Jones VS.. The Standard
Manufacturing Co.; settled; Hamill-
Hamill.
s. w. E. Broderick VS.. H. G. Sin
cell & Co.; continued; Hamill, Helm
del-Renninger.
8. Same VS.. same; continued; same
counsel.
10. j. L. Sims ct al, VS.. H. A.
Wagner; appeal dismissed, Rennin-
ger.
II. j. S. Shuttlesworth VS.. Thomas
Browning; dismissed Renninger-
Hamill.
70. L. B. G. List VS.. Eston Taylor;
continued; Observation-Disclosures.
CIVIL TRIALS.
1. Joseph Il. Osborne VS.. Elijah
Liyengood; continued; Cook, Sincell
Mitchell, Semmes.
2. L. T. Yoder ct al. VS.. Elmira
Hinebaugh; continued; Mitchell
! Sincell
3. E. g. Perrine ct al. VS.. Sarah
Ashby; settled; Howard, Mitchell,
eddicord-Sincell.
4. Sarah Kerfoot VS.. Monroe Coal
Mining Co.; continued; Peddicord-
Sincell.
5. Isaac Thompson VS.. j. 7. OLA
yre; continued; Sincell-Renninger
| nRntt