The times dispatch. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1903-1914, 1905-01-04

his son to fEngl anu " De ~ uStASSoNus
81 some note rec years arts rW'a a
and commander-ln Of the gVirgl u
ferson as Governor Of the State y .S e e
of Washing ton. !8 sl3 J.
s.ig,.s M essage from General Washingt
French flag, resented By the Comm IN =
posted among the arch Ives.
srhe town Of Moultan in Ind la,
British, but with great 4 oss. IN Il, 3
kaufman s testimony; that the wltne /: $,
should lxve been permitted. ~ q s!va, ~ y
Pws sso H. ME sp'ptt ruling
Expressed Opinion.
Exception No. Is to the !, court \, :
astiGn Il e eSpress Els opinon tochiag
the IDENTITY Of she yae pleee
stio oiNi inptpermi.tns Witness R
ae @tnsss
R Reti,Nv, Bout $40 clock
the night Is the homisid 9r,W ,t
sge sR9gs hs anal sse She
di dc not not he rho Objection
legltima to Inference concerning pet5tEttlo2in
cr's guilt or innocence 8co uld n
d1 Hxssp tfSm d the permit;
ting Witness Martin to testify asst o IN
vnm Ss ai
aa afti ha so eonse l1a jury
pectad d Is aha uhtlesss Il u inferStirom
Martins thas ppsat RS minus
esSsa III I,ey 1 Vas natars
further eontsnded nnt Us ! aeslcy
Of this witness NJ az third nnr
Lon pncr then ana there on-
Y and ard thrtee relate
TX e q n1ny Of Witness
~, al OIiyersation be-
tive III father and yon. /, & 3 Il {
alif !ns lie pros proseoutng attorney
psk William Hurley her, 7
not pet ttoner, IN alleged aconyersa ,,l
with SAG anys ~ = opers wifc
Ind 1,,ron Ills plea sur Or chi oymen ~ \
life and answer OF =
lSxceptlon fifteen reates ~ ,ni,eh the
of tfc court ~ Ollt ~ ~ fhe
!ssAh7s nnnioS:
Commonweaith *. ~ a.. rcsnlts 81 blow
ln8regard the M Is = tnranther similar
struck VII z EMMA of Sobjection beng
witness 81 III IN q sand loa g
had never seeI. h M opportunity o.
ana nag %n nsN =, nki,lg an examination {
or, s t ~ ssvif Il sand BAG or
any, person :. =, ~, s.Iuon- e V
Mxennt inns i6. IL, Is, Fl ". =,
q y ss aS AZ and IS all rea r.
~ r., g ,,,,.,, 81 nsntlEby the C0mmonwtalth
inc al,'.vNiiiiam McCue petitioners
81 WINES ~, ced by tho Common %ealt
SOM intrtoad1,.Shn I'm fto prosec wing
Is recsea ~, ,su ,vit claimed to- be
taken by surPfss py G Gor tie Common
mtted that they had never
CAPTAIN Mcajah Gods
condueting the examlna,it9n
oftt he RimsS'e that no had never
Y v ths sas enrey
different ~ t ~ ~ "a in this
had entirely a,e ssed byte
because cause ne l W..s objeetion Tor
the defense here ih ,nnceded Is
cuting attorney II ereuPon oaa csrtnn
he witness AZ ne y i, n on witness
stat " Nc y
noted the defense youE "a
~ Iyil,am sMcCle,s
!o me -. hose q re:
ldayylng 'ahfoIiettqh s''e
been alG%sd f9 'n bypasking hm
w Slysl or not he had made
statement1S eseWee5e
- Etoasa NJ, We n,rovinn ~ other witnesses
t tha made contradictlng state
= g, * ion t't ~ co,irt?
4, nHd h tbe tCommonweat IN
t ERIE LIEU ~ u a Noe them?
th}s ls,G my under
any circilmstances ask the s3 nj tness
:, MNI1 Vas ruty ana, III so,
LII ia n,nn, an wealth when the Wit
rossu e a,1IeS nvin = az pressed such opii-
i i n, Nm AZ hifn nv brewing thnt4thc
ioni, s9 I, snn pssxnpressed Tia opi-
m WY .st ~ no,,aei WIS guilty?
loii ltas s''i ~ -, : ne
Il Argued at Leng til. 4s;e
These various grouped except lofis, tt ken
IN Tia mat tor Of I he a testimony of WI n.
liam M oCue, arc arg ued t great leinEt y,