The Fairmont West Virginian. (Fairmont, W. Va.) 1904-1914, 1905-02-14
Iron Master WIN Deny That He Ever
Signed Any Notes For the Wo.
man or That She Is In Any n
Way Related to Him. y

5E man or ~ mar she IS IN ANY
Way Related to Him.
NEW YORK, Fob. l4,-SAndrew
Carnegie will appear us Il witness
against Mrs Cassie L.. Chadwick,
when the woman's trial comes UP in
court att Cleveland. Mr.. Carnegie Will
not only5deny, having signed securities
for a .single dollar for Mrs. Chadwick,
hut he will deny that the}woman Is.
his daughter, or, In fact, any relative
OF his. Furthermore. Mrl8 Carnegie,
will deny ever having heard of Mrs.
Chadwick until$his name. became con.
nected witf$her financial operations
Mr. CarnogleSon Saturday made an
extended statement bearing on the
Chadwick case. He had been served
with a subpoena by nj United States
marshal toiappear III Cleveland before
the United States Court on March G
TO testify against Mr.. Chadwick. In
discussing Mr. Chadwick Mr.. Car.
negie said: /,
Mrs. Chadwick has caused lis 3 IA
Lotto trouble, hasn't she? i was Just
getting ready 70 50 South$for q little
vacation when got the subpoena 10.
day. T.,would$ give a lot rather than
lose mystrip. fbut5n man shouldt!oYeer
disobey court5summons The case
Is very impor, INT autobiography
should consider II SO. My duty as a
citizen is to 50 Ito Cleveland and tes;
I,tify. was early convinced that this
thing was a fraud"
Here Mr. Carnegie asked what; the
opinion Of the general public was con.
corning his alleged relations with
Mrs. Chadwick, and when told that
people generally are convinced that
he has had absolutely nothing to- do
with the woman, but that when Mrs.
ChadwlcEs defense is offered she
may claim Mr.. Carnegie to he her
father, the iron master sud 49, .iiilSiil
5"But size herself has admitted that
she was lying when she. claimed rela.
tionship me. How can she now
take her first attitude again and say
that she is my daughter? Well. what:
ever she may attempt TO do .aboutpro.
|duclng proof, She cannot succeed I
shall say on the stand that this wo.
man Is not my daughter that size Is
not related to me; that / have never
seen her TO my knowledge, and that
! never. heard of her until heri fraud.
ulent notes were made public. But
am thoroughly convinced that the
Woman will never be foolish enough
TO attempt to prove her claims.
Mr.. Carnegie recalled the fact thai
Mrs. Chadwlck's age and that she
was born in Woodstock Canada; and and
remarked :$"Whytha would make me
her father at Is years Of age. Fur.
thllermore, \ have never in my life
been t,fs1 IN Canada, and SO far as have
heard her mother lived in Canada
mostEof the time Now knowing that
these facts can be produced, i am
thoroughly convinced that she ought.
not to- attempt to justify her first
claims ! cannot understand, howey.
err CT. M how this woman, In jail now and
apparently without funds, can com
mand the services of the most bril-.
liantslawyers in Ohio. "A
When told that In Cleveland there
were nyslaw firms whose names
had not yet been mentioned in ( cor con.
lnectlon with the case, Mr.. Carnegie
remarked: II think i now begin Ito
esthrough this. Now wonder5if II,
Is possible that Mrs Chadwick is lew levy.
Ing ON these gentlemen
When Mr.. Carnegie was told that
II would likely be- Necessary Il have
his financial men with him at the
trial trial he said they would be- taken.
M! Mt, Carnegie emphat lcally Il denied
I having ever signed "a singl & paper sls for
Mrs Mrs. y Chadwick and added Il have
seen in the wspapers pho ograuphs [
q 8th l1s SIGNATURES and they seem MEL