The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1905-06-30
DOES MAN NEED MEAT,
Use or Usefulness of Beef Diet a Do.
batabIe Question.

batable Question.
New York Herald: The food ques-
ton is one that has appealed to man
kind from the time good mother Eve
tried her dangerous experiment With
the forbidden apple. Hers was the
first assertion of appetite which craved
for the variety of diet which her num-
erous and equally venturesome de-
scendants have strenuously maintained
is the real spice of life. Every. since
the primitive man ate what he could
get until the present, when his civilized
brother gets all he cen eat and looks
for new lands to conquer. the culti-
waited instinct Of selection has been an
evolutionary and progressive one, con-
%tributing to the general gayety Of ma
TONS" We have perhaps gone to the
extreme OF Indulgence. like spoiled
children, but the habit is a little too
firmly seated in the saddle to be bucked
uncermoniously in midair by some new
and fanciful theory of jerking the curb
rein.
The scientists tell US we consume too
much food, and they are right, SO far
Us they so; but we listen and smile and
eat on, in spite OF their chemical for
mulae, their test tube methods and
AAASiA oAAoASoSo u lSldlINc
food values. So, perhaps, 1t will al
ways be, as long as man, the willful
arbiter of his wv destinies, insists up
on living to eat rather Than eating to
live.
III real trouble, however with all
projected reforms in feeding has been
their lack OF practical application to
actual needs. There is apparently no
middle ground for the discussion Of
general principles Of compromise be-
tween the actual gourmand and the
n and abstemious crank Theor-
les are arbitrary on one side and facts
are equally stubborn on the other.
When the army squad has been fed
for weeks on the accurately estimated
food equivalent of certain approved
viands, the victims craved an ordinary
Indulgence in plain ~old-fashioned corn
beef n cabbage. The limit had been
reached. n simple nature made her
W cry in her own way. 1t was APP
petite against chemical experiment and
healthy hunger against mathematical
estimates Of abstract. nutrient forces.
These manifestations Of natural
guards against the purely scientific
methods such as have been applied to
the poison boarders' and the army
squad. " We may interpret natural
laws, but science with all it's learn
ing and skill, cannot alter them.
In the face of such a conviction we
are now assured by high standing au-
thority that meat is virtually useless
for any of the nutrient purposes SO long
claimed for it. How much more our
bill of fare is to be trimmed to suit the
newer notions OF the day is somewhat
difficult to imagine.
Aside from the pure theory of the
matter, we may in he end be forced
70 believe that man was never made
| for q mixed diet; that his stomach and
complicated intestinal apparatus are
merely an accidental survival of USE
less organs, Of which the insignificant
and troublesome appendix is the type.
Experience, however, against which
there is never much of an argument,
must prove its value against the mere
logic of arbitrary rules. The hungry
man with q juicy steak before him will
continue his hurtful habit of loading
his stomach with unnecessary fodde in
spite Of all theories to the contrary.
His instructive need for Just such nour-
ishment as he takes will answer all
! other questions. He will not care how
much more he can lift, nov mucl,
faster he can rum, or how much more
fatigue he can endure, but will simply
satisfy his want for the time.
And, in spite of crank notions to the
contrary, is not this the prope and
rational way Of solving the law OF de-
mand and supply upon which our very
being is based? The craving for GER
ain varieties Of food is as constant as
its qualification is imperative. Each
tissue makes its own demands in its
own way n signals appetite to select
and nutrition to apportion the multiple
supplies for bone, muscle and blood.
Nutritior, energy and heat are mere
abstract terms in themselves, and their
proper Interpretation can never be
safely intlusted to laboratory tests or
chemical formulate. Therefore, let us
not be in too great n hurry to ADOPT
new views that are neither sound, ra-
tional nor practical. In spite of the
manifesto we are led to believe that
the average man will still take to his
beef whenever he needs it and can get
it-and pray, why NOS?