Waterbury evening Democrat., 1905-05-19
DIVORCE HEARINGS
Strange Stories Told by Women h
 Court To-Day.

Strange stories were told at the hear.
 ing of the divorces before Judge
 Thayer in the superior court today.
 Mrs Mary Daney. who is seeking sepa- ration from Edward E. Daney on the
 grounds that he was already married
 when he married her. stated that OH
 October 26, 1889, she became the wife of Daney. A few months later he left
 her. A woman who claimed to have
 been married to him in Iowa entered
 upon the peace of their domestic life and broke it up. Mrs Daney was only
 II then. After Daney had left for parts unknown, Mrs Daney inquired about him and ascertained from Cap tain Ryan of the New York police force that he had brother in the captains precinct Mrs Daney could not see the brother but she saw his wife and she informed her that Daney was his moth CTS name and his own was Quick. She also obtained copy of his mar IiaGe to the othars woman Quick or Qauey wns 4t that time .with A cir, GUS. Attorney Durant who appeared for the plaintiff said he did not want to try the case today but merely to let the court know the circumstances and decide if another order of publica- ton was necessary The court thought one was necessary. moreover as Daney was not the mans real name. so the order was granted and 1t is to be pub lished In the New York American and Journal.
 Trigamy was the trend of the story of Mrs Adella E. w. DeNoyelles, who asked for the annullment of her mar riage with George Nelson DeNoyelles alias George N. Fisher. The plaintih was represented by Attorney Gillette. The marriage of these parties took place in West Brighton, staten Island, on May 20, last year. At that time they were working in Beacon Falls. They first met in Naugatuck a short time before their marriage. They stayed in West Brighton only a short time, A day or two, and then came to wate3bury and stayed with her father intending to return 10 Beacon Falls. On the morning of their second day here the defendant left town and for few days nothing was heard of him. Plain tifY as amazed at his abrupt departure and singular conduct She was unable to account for it. However. he re- turned as abruptly as he had gone away and said he had been to Phila- delphIa looking for work. The expla- nation satisfied her. But a day or two after he disappeared again. Plain tjff went to Naugatuck and ascertAined there at the house where he used to board before his marriage that he had gone to Philadelphia again. Wondering at his strange conduct plaintiff came home and received another shock about a week later. This came In the form of a. telegram from Beacon Falls from her husband requesting her to meet him in DaDbury. Suspicion now be gan to take up it's abode in the mind of the plaintiff. She went 10 Danbury as requested by the telegram and there met defendant She did not un- derstand the situation. still she accused him of having deceived her and he admitted in a burst of fearS that he had. He cried like child" said the plaintiff, and. when asked by the court if she knew of any reason why he told her. she said that he had done % for her welfare. But it was evident rhat this WAS the plaintiffs own eonstruc- ton on the matter. Continuing her story, she said that the defendant sd- mifted to her that he had a vIIe whose name was Maria Mcdonnell. and two children by a previous marriage still living. After this expsanafion they parted. plaintiff returning to her work in Beacon Falls and the defendant go- ing to Hartford To the court plain tin admitted thst she did not know if the defendant had been divorced from his other wives. and tn obtain information on inst point the case was .af<-rruo-d . Ucet