Rock Island Argus. (Rock Island, Ill.) 1893-1920, 1905-05-30
ABOUT THE COURT HOUSE.
Rock Island county circuit court,
Judge Emery c. Graves presiding.
CIRCUIT COURT.

mat all proofs may be admitted under
the pleas and replication filed without
joining ssue that could be admitted
under such pleas and replications of
we'll and specially pleaded
103, James Rutledge vs.. George r.
Swift & Co. Case. Jury return into
court and by their verdict find the
defendant guilty and assess the plain
tiff's damages against the defendant at
s.. 1888
121, Asa L. Knowlton, administrator
of Sebastian Hammes vs.. Chicago.
Burlington & Quincy Railroad com
pany, and Chicago, Burlington & Quin-
cy Railway company. Case. Motion
by defendant railway company to
strike cause from trial list.
The people ex rel Lottie A. Bleakley
vs.. James G. Barclay and Stella Bar
clay. Habeas corpus. On motion OF
defendants time to file return extended
to morning of May 81.
Matthias Schnell VS.. city of Rock
Island. Assumpsit Motion by defend
ant for a rule on plaintiff TO file a more
specific account. Motion confirmed.
Plaintiff ruled to file a more specific
account by Wednesday noon next mo-
ton by defendant TO vacate the rule
this day entered for more specific ac
count and for leave to withdraw mo-
ton for same. Motion allowed, rule
vacated and motion Withdrawn.
Chancery.
%. Frank Muhlberger VS. Tessic
Muhlberger. Divorce. Cause dismiss
ed by complainant at his costs.
&C. Nellie Scales VS.. Charles l.
Scales. Divorce Case dismissed by
complainant at her costs.
so, Louise Bramer VS.. James Bra
mer Divorce. Cause dismissed by.
complainant at her costs.
50. Charles p. Skinner ct al VS..
Charles F. Hemenway ct al Bill. Pc
tition of trustee for direction as to pay
of attorneys fees filed March - heard.
Ordered that trustee pay attorneys.
fee as set forth in the petition.
So. Anna Hincher VS.. Hugo Hincher.
Divorce Cause stricken.
81. Donna c. Ruby vs.. f. b. Ruby.
Redocket. Cause striker.
1872. Josephine Kerr VS.. William II.
Kerr. Divorce. Case dismissed byl
complainant at her costs.
2O4. Van V Reeves administrator
of estate of F. NJ. Tindall VS.. George r
Gilmore ct al. Foreclosure Motion
by complainant for default as to
George T. Gilmore for want of answer
under rule of May 10. Defendant
George T. Gilmore called and default
ed for want of answer under rule
4 80 nl - l.
and replication of complainant TO such
answer filed Cause referred to mas
ter-in-chancery. TO take proofs and re-
port conclusions of law and fact
240. Elizabeth Spence VS.. Grant w
Spence. Divorce and injunction Per
sonal service. Defendant called and
defaulted.
Emma f. Hauschildt VS.. John Haul
schildt Divorce and Injunction Cause |
heard, finding for complainant for di- |
vorce as prayed, and decree for di- !
vOrce and that complainant resume her |
maiden name of Emma E. Zimmerman |
Frances Wittick Ell al VS. Thomas
Wittick. Partition. Masters report of
evidence and findings as to solicitors
fees and distributiye shares filed and
approved.
Criminal.
People of the state of Illinois VS.. |
Joseph Cooper. disturbing the peace |
Cause certified TO county court of this =
county for trial.
People of the state of Illinois VS. |
c. S. Mahaffey. Larceny. Cause certi- /
fed to county court of this county |
for trial
People of the state of Illinois VS. |
William SwitZer. Cause certified to- /
county court of this county for trial 1
People of the state of Illinois vs.. II
Edward Riley. Burglary and larceny. /
Defendant in court and served with /
copy of Indictment and list of jurors /
and Witnesses. and is arraigned and
pleads not guilty.
People of the state of Illinois VS. 4
William II. Nelson. Defendant in 4
court, served with copy of Indictment i
and list Of Witnesses and is arraigned Il
and pleads guilty 10 petty larceny. i
Plea explained and defendant admon-
ished and plea persisted in by defend
ant. Judgment and sentence that de
PENDANT be confined in the county Il
work house for a period of co days. II
and that while there he shall work I'M
der the direction of the keeper of the 4
work house and that he pay a fine of
81 and costs Of this proceeding and
work out fine and costs at rate of $50
a day under the keeper Of the work
house of this county
People OF the state OF Illinois W.
William II. Nelson. Larceny Same as
n No. Sc last above. except time of
confinement etc, to begin at expiTa-
ion of sentence in No So
People OF the state of Illinois VS.
saac Berry. Burglary Defendant in