Sistersville daily oil review. [volume] (Sistersville, W. Va.) 1902-1905, 1905-02-10
Miscellaneous Business
Transacted Thursday

lion is a fair cash value Of the
property. A motion was made in
the appeal case of Reymann Brew
ing company VS.. The Clendenning
company by the defendant to
quash the summons and return
endorsed thereon. The Court was
of the opinion that said motion
J to quash was made too late, hav-
ing been waived by the appear
ance Of the defendant to the sum-
mons before the Justice on the
merits of the case. The non-res-
idence of the plaintiff in the case
of J. A. Ginkle VS.. q. T. Whitehill
was suggested, and security for
costs required within sixty days
from the rise of the court. An or
der was handed down in the
cause of Joseph Speidel Grocery
company vs.. M. E. Stark ct al.
that G. o. Cutler do after having
advertised the time, terms and
place in some newspaper publish
ed in Tyler county, sell at public
auction to the highest bidder for
cash, the buildings set out and de-
scribed in the papers, which con-
sist of a store room and dwelling
house on a lot in Garry Owen.
! On motion of plaintiff by counsel,
an order was entered dismlsslng
the cause of Margaret A. Hays VS..
John Hayes. The object of this
suit was to secure dissolution OF
the bonds of matrimony and was
instituted at the August rules,
1904. 1t will be remembered that
the defendant in this suit commit
ted suicide some time in the
month of last September at the
home of the plaintiff in Lincoln
district. A decree was entered
dissolving the bonds Of matri-
mony in the cause of George Den
bow VS.. Sarah Jane Denbow.
George says he married Sarah
Jane in the State of Ohio, some
time in the year of 1856, and they
lived together until the year 1890,
at which time she wilfully desert
ed him without any just cause.
That on more than one occasion
she had told him that there were
hundreds of others she loved bet
ter, that her extravaganza IN
housekeeping had ruined him IL
nancially, and for several years
he has been depending upon the
charity of his nephew, Nathan
Salisbury.
The appeal case Of j. F. Wolf
VS.. S. H. Nicely from Justice Kirt-
land Of Sistersville, was tried be-
fore the court in lieu of jury,
and a verdict was rendered in ia
vor of the plaintiff for the sum of
$122.O5 with interest and costs
against the defendant, and d. ii.
Cox, his bondsman. This suit was
instituted to recover damages for
the loss of a casing line which had
been left at a rig, that the plain
tiff soh to the defendant. The
appeal case of T. B. Hawkins vs..
McKelvy Oil & Gas company was
submitted to the court in lieu OF
a jury, and a verdict was render
ed in favor of the plaintiff and
against the defendant for the
sum of $500, with interest and
costs. This suit was brought to
recover money due by virtue OF a
certain oil and gas lease wherein
there was an agreement to pay
the sum of 5000 for each gas well
when used off thepremises. 1t ap-
pears that the well on the plain
tiff's premises produced both oil
and gas, that the usual royalty OF
TX of the oil had been delivered
and the company utilized the gas
and refused payment. A decree
was entered in the chancery cause
of Maggie f. Hagan VS.. Melvin
Clyde Hagan dissolving the bonds
of matrimony existing between
the Darties TO this suit, and al