Burlington weekly free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1866-1928, 1905-03-30
COUNTY COURT OPENED
Nineteen Cases Oh Jury Calendar
for Trial.
COsgrlT- N1cSwccncy Case Set for April
1O-Specin1 Grand Jury Mt Work
-Mnny Cnses DiscOn.
(inUcd.

Nit'r having Dccn continued for three
successive weeks. county court was OPEN
cd Tuesday afternoon with Judge Wat
son presiding. The grand jury began
WORK ana the several calendars were call
cd, that work occupying all the time.
There are 10 cases on the jury calendar
Tor trial but some of them may be other
wiso disposed of before the close of the
term. The first case set for trial is that
of Charles W. Howe VS.. Horace Brown,
an action Of trespass. 1t will be taken
up this afternoon ut two o'clock.
Tho case Of Garrett NJ. Cosgriff and
Margaric NJ. Cosgriff vs.. DR.. T.. T.. Me-
sweeney, for which n struck jury has been
drawn. Is set for trial on April 10. When
tins case was first tried It occupied four
weeks but the present trial is expected to
be shorter.
The grand jury which began Tuesday
was Il special ono. drawn for the purpose
of disposng uf the cases against Dennis
and Louis Trcmblcy, who are charged
with the murder of Louis Lamora at Wi
nooski last January. This jury will also
probably take up the case against Thomas
Burke and Thomas Burns who are charg-
cd with holding up c. u. Vincent last Mo-
vember and robbing him. a large number
of witnesses have been called but it is
expected that the grand jury will be able
to report within two or three days.
The following cases on tho jury calendar
were set for trials f. c. Mower vs.. j. d.
Mccarthy and J. u. Brodc; |. +. Law
renee vs.. G.. T.. Prindlc; Victor La Bontc
vs.. J.. G. Grossman; Alfred Bushcy VS..
Abe Worthcim: Citizens Coal Co. vs.. St
Adams Street Railway company; Christy
Peters vs.. G. W. Kelley and j. Il. Brodic
Henry Raymond vs.. Anthony Donnelly;
T.. II. Tarrand vs.. Peter Bordo: Thomas
Reeves W. Charles and Mary Gibbs; G
d. Shcrwin vs.. Lena +. Walker; j. A.
Murphy vs. Harry Boardman and Mrs
W. O. baldwin,; n. A. Durand vs.. George
Goodrich; A. w. Bclka and wife vs. NJ. +
Allen; Mary NJ. Strong vs.. Burlington
Tract ton company; Casper Berry & Co. vs
q. O. Richardson; f. $. gIoyt W. Emily
Us. Eliza H. May
The following cases were discontinued
Duffy I.avec VS.. Charles Buckham; Julius
Seymour vs.. Alfred Bixby; Henry Jennett
vs.. Henry Ward; Howard National bank
vs.. Northern Manufacturing Co; George
Love VS.. Laura Beccher; l.. NJ. Horton VS.
!. - ~ bTlcn, ftOScnla "A. IiOWc VS.. D. I
Pollard: w. H. Ring VS.. T.. II. Deavitt
Emil l[cislich VS.. Central Vermont Rail.
way Co.; John Shonsl,i VS.. Anthony Pei
kis, Theodore Hopkins and James Fine
Theodore Frechctte vs.. Joseph Poquettc
John Blair vs.. Lemuel Elmer; Carol
Bartlett VS.. \. T.. Goodrich: J. L. Barrett
vs. James Fine and l.. NJ. bingham; W
II. Murray vs.. New England Telephone
& Telegraph company; +. II. Farrand vs.
John Yandow: q. S. Blodgctt Co. VS.. T.. l.
and Anna NJ. Knott Reynolds McGinni:
Co. vs.. w II. Mansfield; T. *. Milne vs.
" y. Billiard: l.. D Clark and w. \. Can
dee vs. Central Vermont Railway Co.: a
+. Read VS.. Archie Dague; Essex Pub
fishing Co. VS.. j. w. Morrow: Edmond
Guyotte vs.. I. \. Burncs; Frederic Good
row vs.. Evainc +. S. Goodrow; Mary +,
! Badger vs.. Abraham Badger.
In the case of Thomas O'Neil vs. Franz
! Harrington an entry of non-suit VIII
costs WAS made. y" disposition WAS mad
| OF the case of G. y. KING vs. Dr. i. II
! McMahon. an action for alleged alienation
If affections.
There Will he several criminal cases TO
trial, the most important being tina
AGAINST Benjamin Williams, who is charg
cd with the murder of Policeman Jane
+. McGrath. 1t is not known when tn
criminal docket will he reached.