The Ocala banner., 1905-12-08
Court Docket for December Term.
which coovoneS Today

which coavenes Today.
Circuit court of this. the fifth judi
cial circuit, opens tomorrow with
Judge w. S. Bullock on the bench
and Acting States Attorney Ed W.
Davis to take care of the states cas-
eS.
The following is the civil docket:
H. L. Anderson, as trustee, VS.. F. c.
& P R. R-ejectment. Attorneys for
plaintiff, H. L. Anderson and r. L.
Anderson; for defendants, L. n. Green
and Geo. P. Raney.
The W. B. Johnson Co. VS.. Howell
& Bell-assumpsit. Attorneys for
plaintiff, Owen and Smith; for de-
fense, Alfred and Davis.
Chas. A. Miller VS.. J. F. Sigmon-
action at law Plaintiffs attorney, H
L. Anderson; for defense, w K Ze-
wadski.
Chas. A. Miller VS.. Alex Wynne-
action at law. Plaintiffs attorney, H.
L. Anderson, for defense, W. K Ze-
wadski.
W. B. Thomas VS.. Dean & Bell
action at law. Plaintiffs attorney, r.
II. "A
wadski.
A. Gordon Young VS.. E. B. Wealth
ers-ejectment. Plaintiffs attorneys,
T. E. Biggs and w. K Zewadski; for
defense, H L. Anderson
Stone Hill Wine Co. vs. o. Grothe-
assumpsit. Plaintiffs attorney. T. E.
Biggs; for defense, Edwin Spencer.
Jake Brown VS.. Jennie Miller
ejectment. Plaintiffs attorney, T. E.
Biggs; for defense. H. l.. Anderson.
]. A. Cave VS.. A. c. L. r. R--tres-
pass. Plaintiffs attorney, L. T. Izlar;
for defense, r. A. Burford.
H L. Anderson VS.. Hood and Hub
bard-assumpsit. Plaintiffs attorney.
r. L. Anderson; for defense, Alfred
and Davis.
S. W. Petteway VS.. F. H. Haynes
ejectment. Plaintiffs attorneys. Hook
er and Duval; for defense H. L. An
derson-
Ethel Crosby, an infant, by her next
friend, j. w. Crosby, VS. A c. L. R.
R-action at law. Plaintiffs attor-
ney, r. L. Anderson: for defense, r.
A. Burford.
VIM. A Green VS.. A. c. L. r. R
action at law. Plaintiffs attorney, H.
l.. Anderson; for defense, R. A Bur-
ford.
j. L. Edwards VS.. z. X. Nelson
assumpsit Plaintiffs attorney, H. L.
Anderson; for defense, Alfred and Da-
Wis.
Ocala Foundry and Machine Works
VS.. Montgomery Cooperage and Hard
wood Co.-unlawful retainer Plain
tiff's attorneys. Alfred and Davis; for
defense, Hooker and Duval.
Nathan Mayo VS.. c. L. Grace-re-
plevin Plaintiffs attorneys, Alfred &
Davis.
N. c. Morton and husband. by B. j.
Morton. VS.. s. A. L. Ry,-actiOn at
lave Plaintiffs attosney. H L. An
derson; for defense, l.. n. Green
S. A Standley & Co, vs. j. r. Mar
tin & Co-replevin. Plaintiffs attor-
ney, Joseph Bell
Simmons Hardware Co. VS.. CIyatt
and Rush-assumpsit. Plaintiffs at
torney, r. McConathy: for defense,
Carter and Layton.
Will Starks VS.. S. A. l.. Ry-tres-
pass Plaintiffs attorney, l. T. Izlar;
for defense L. \. Green. Geo. p. Ra-
ney.
vs. Peacock and Eargraves-action at
law Plaintiffs attorneys, H. L. and
r. L. Anderson: for defense, r. B.
Bullock and Hooker and Duval.
J. H. Livingston & Son. VS.. z. A.
Butt-assumpsit. Plaintiffs attor-
ney. H. l. Anderson; for defense, r.
A. Burford and r. McConathy-
Kibler Bros. VS.. A. NJ. ROSS-action
at law. Plaintiffs attorneys. H L.
Anderson and w. X. Zewadski; for
defense, Joseph Bell.
w. A. Willard ct al vs. John b. Mar
tin-ejectment PLAINTIFFS attorney,
L. n. Green; for defense, H L. Ander-
son.
Criminal Docket
| State of Florida VS.. ]. Shaw Thomp-
! sOn-murder. E. W. Davis and
| Thomas Palmer for state; r. L. An
| derson, t P. Lloyd and ]. NJ. Young
| for defense.
State of Florida VS.. Marshall Guth-
| rle-aSSault WIN lHtelt W IHuI IucI
| E. w. Davis for state; Hooker and
| Duval for defense.
| State of Florida VS.. Andrew Jack
i son-aSsault with intent to murder
| E w Davis for state; r. 3. Bullock
for defense
| Fearful Fate.
| I it is a fearful fate to have to en-.
| dure the terrible torture of piles. 81