The true northerner. [volume] (Paw Paw, Mich.) 1855-1920, 1905-11-10
Circuit Court.

LIE IoiOWlNg ndtheu pe'sous, tuuiCteu
by the grand jury, have been arrested
and arranged:
Hartney Shaw of Lawton, Bookkeeping
plea not guilty; gave bail.
Samuel Joyce of Lawton; Bookkeeping;
plea not guilty; gave bail.
John Sykes of Paw Paw; bootlegging;
three indictments; plea not guilty; com
mitted in default of bal on last two in
dictments.
Walter Wilson of Paw Paw; bootleg
ging; plea not guilty; gave bail.
Arthur +. Mcdowell of South Haven,
druggist; violation of local option law,
plea not guilty; bail given.
Henry ID. Harvey of Bangor, druggist
violation local option law, second offence;
plea not guilty; gave bail.
Oscar Karmsen of Bangor, druggist;
violation local option law, second otfense;
plea not guilty; gave bail.
Ralph A. Lamberson Of Paw Paw;
keeping gaming room; plea not guilty;
gave bail
William. ,-as=-@v of Paw Paw; keep
ing gaming room; plea not guilty; gave
bail.
George Longduff of Paw Paw; criminal
assault; plea not guilty; committed IN
default of bail
Claude Miller of Lawrence druggist;
violation local option law; plea not guilty;
gave bail.
Matthew Van Alstyne of South Haven,
druggist; violation of local option law;
plea not guilty; gave bail.
John f. Thompson of Covert, druggist;
violation local option law; plea not guilty;
gave bail.
Robert Boyd of South Haven; boot
Logging; plea not guilty; committed IN
default of bail.
George Bates Of South Haven; boot
logging; plea not guilty; committed IN
default of bail.
George Lamson of Waverly; bootleg
ging; two indictments plea not guilty;
gave bail.
w. Cook of Antwerp; criminal assault
plea not guilty; committed in default of
bail.
Frank ii. Plat vs.. j. c. Filliman; con-
tinued on terms.
People VS.. Ed. George of Lawton;
burglary; plea guilty; sentenced two
and one half years to ID at Iona; court
recommends four years as proper maxi
mum.
People VS.. Harry Prehn of Lawton;
burglary; plea guilty; sentenced three
to 10 years at Ionia; court recommends
five years as proper maximum.
Susie Wiley and Chas. Wiley vs.. Kibbie
Telephone Co.; order for security for
cost; SO in each case.
Pliny Hubbard VS.. VIM. Keefer; Ger
tiorari; judgment affirmed
Emma M. Darling vs.. Jennie ID. Nc.
Gurrin ct al vs. partition; decree and
order of sale.
Henry Watkins VS.. Simon Funk ct al;
decree reforming deeds.
ID. w L OSL tl al vs.. IODtII NClulOSu,
decree confirming complainants' title.
Jay Blaisdell VS.. Alice j. Blaisdell;
divorce; degree granted.
Thomas Robbins vs. Mary G. Day;
decree ordering conveyance of title to
complainant.
". w. Crandal ct al. VS. Herbert G.
Me cheney. This is the much written
about and talked of Paw Paw river drain
case. The court made a decree sustain
ing the demurrer and Diminishing the bill
of complaint without cost to either party,
but this action was for the purpose of
enabling the parties to obtain a speedy
review of the case in the supreme court
Judge Carr stated that ne did not think
his decision was correct and felt conf
dent it would be reversed by the supreme
court, his real opinion being that the
river being a meandered, navigable
stream, its course cannot be changed by
operation of the state drain laws.