Evening bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1895-1912, 1905-10-30
IMPORTANT FACTS
Shown IN LETTER


ney employing the entire forenoon ses
sion with further cross.examination OF
Magoon.
Before going on with the cross eT
animation. | wish to state that | have
refreshed my memory regarding my
attitude in regard to the Injunction
against Carter from notes | took dur.
ing the argument" said Magoon at the
start. They will confirm what have
already said in the matter, that
never intended the injunction to act
against Carter as guardian"
Kinney asked Magoon to show that
the notes showed that he gave notice
that there was nothing in the injunc.
ton which would limit Carriers right
to control Annie T. X. Parkers half OF
the ranch.
Magoon said he could not show that
The notes only showed the statements
made in his argument. He had sale
in his argument that Carter as guar
dian had a right to go on the minor
proP>ty.
Kinney asked Magoon If he haC
brought the Low.McCrosson correspon
dence. Magoon said he had not. II,
had asked Low for the letters. bu
Low did not have them and had alst
sent away the copies he had mad,
from them. Low had one letter h.
had written to Hind. Rolph & Co, bu
did not wish to produce the lette
before he was called as a witness. Ma
COON had this letter in his pocket bu
would not produce 1t.
Kinney said he claimed the right
have the letter produced as he h'
served notice that the letter was want
ed. -slSNNvvNU
Lightfoot said Kinney had 10 siGA1
to insist on the production Of this ~
ter. Kinney insisted and the Cou.
ordered its production and after COZ.
siderable argument 1t was read by Nj
COON.
Oct 30, 1904.
To Messrs. Hind. Rolph & Co.,
San Francisco.
Yours OF the Goth inst. duly reache,
me and contents carefully examined.
was exceedingly surprised at Nj
! John HinA and yourselves being duml
founded over my explanation of th'
Parker" case. as | certainly shove,
that considered his and your interest
as well as the interests of this agenc,
| before | ventured to proceed in tn,
case, knowing full well beforehand
that | was going to occupy some o.
your time as well as a good deal o
my own time outside of office hours II
order to accomplish its ends. In sup
port of the statements previously sub
mittcd in my letter of the 18th inst. re
garding this matter and denied by MIR
John Hind. enclose herewith for you
perusal certified copies of letters pass
ing between Mr.. John Hind and Mr.
J. I. McCrosson, contents of which
hope will relieve the dumbfoundeC
feelings of Mr.. John Hind and your
selves. When you are through will
same please return TO my address.
also enclose herewith copy of my pr
vate letter to you under date of Jul!
In, 1904. in which explained my exac
position in relation to this case and III
effect on my attention to your bust
ness; also copy of your reply to SAM
dated July 2Sth, 1904, in which yo'
made no material objection. The men
ton | made of my intention to pa,
this agency a portion of all and an,
Remuneration | may receive from tn
courts in representing the minor II
lthes, proceedings was not giveI. as
reason for my having entered into thi
Litigation for your behalf, but was d
rected to you in answer to your state
ments in paragraph two of yours OF y
2S'O4, wherein you stated that Il CIV
too much time to my own personal ma
tiers not connected with your bushes
at all, - - for which you suppos
you pay me salary for my entir
time" wish to add further in regar
to the Parker" case, that while ! pei
sonally undertook to protect the intel
ests of the minor In this case as he
next friend, at the urgent solicitatio
of those interested in the Hamaku
Ditch Co., want you to thorough
understand that am not misrepreseI
ting myself in any dishonest way !
the presentation OF TINS suit. 1t Is m
feeling at heart to see that this mino
child, who Is a blood relative OF min'
is not robbed of single cent by an!
one; neither Is 1t the wish OF the Ill
malua Ditch Co., who are merely asl
ing for a right OF way, which the pre-
ent guardian of the minor absolutel
refuses to entertain. 1t was matte
which might well have been taken II
by mlself voluntarily and without. an
solicitation of those interested in tn
Ditch Co., had my time been my owl
!, but, as this agency was negotiating 10
5 the business of the Ditch Co., and NJ
John Hind being personally intereste
in same, and the suit being no sourc
of expense 10 this agency, | deemed
narfactly nrODer for me to he DerSOl