Ottumwa tri-weekly courier. [volume] (Ottumwa, Iowa) 1903-1916, 1905-10-19


him. Seneca Cornell, attorney for the
plaintiff.
N. S: Polling VS.. Dora C..
Polling and F. A. Kendall, fore
closure. Plaintiff prays for fore
closure of mortgage to satisfy judg-
ment Of $411.70, on promissory note
for $50 and that special execution
be issued for sale of mortgaged prop
Eerty. Smith & Lewis, attorneys for
the plaintiff.
4 John T. McCune vs. Guy Oyerturf,
et al, petition for injunction, enjoining
i defendants from interfering with plain
tiff in the taking care of his orchard
and crops and the use Of stock and
implements, for failure to live up to
contract entered into by defendants
and plaintiff. A. C. Steck, attorney for
the plaintiff
Nancy A. zellner VS.. James N. Da-
Wis, Ct al, petition for partition of GER
tain described real estate in Wapello
county. Work & Work. attorneys for
the plaintiff.
Harriet Il. Adams VS.. Charles Carson
|
described real estate in Wapello coun-
ty, and in event of same not permit
ting of partition, that court order 1t
sold Plaintiff further asks that she
be paid $431.S5 out of the proceeds Of
sale 10 satisfy taxes previously paid
on property. Sumner Siberell, attorney
for the plaintiff.
Law Cases.
| William R. Lanning vs.. George B.
Morrison, suit on account Plaintiff
asks for Judgment against defendant
in the sum of $10S.54, together with
the costs of this action, for changes
made in plans for the erection Of a
house Lowenberg & Coen, attor-
neys for plaintiff.
Tisdale Bros. VS.. Frank Hathaway ct
al, suit on note Plaintiffs demand
Judgment in the sum of $3o0.29 and at
torney's fee, on two promissory notes
of $780, Tisdale and Heindel, attorz
neys for plaintiffs.
Sarah Walker vs. T. j. Riley, suit
on note. Plaintiff asks for judgment
in the cum of s244.26 and costs of this
action, to satisfy two promissory notes
given by defendant F.. G. Orelup, at
torney for the plaintiff.
Martin Furniture and Carpet Co., VS..
Blanche Campbell ct al, suit on note.
Plaintiff company asks for judgment
in the sum Of $262.31 and attorneys
fees to satisfy promissory note given
in the sum of $262.31. Lowenberg &
Coen, attorneys for plaintiff company.
E. D. Fair VS. Caroline Leeling, suit
o mote. Plaintiff prays for Judgment
in the sum Of $5O796 and costs of this
action to satisfy promissory note in
the sum of $3.50. Seneca Cornell, at
torney for the plaintiff.
Duke & McMullen Land Co. VS..
c.. G. Packard. suit on contract. Plain
tiff company demands judgment in the
sum of 1898 with interest and costs
for defendants alleged breach of con-
tract concerning the sale of certain
real estate in Wapello county. Work
& Work, attorneys for the plaintiff
company
Sella Hurless vs. Charles M. Mer-
ten, suit on contract. Plaintiff de-
mands judgment in the sum of $185
annually for the care of Charles Mer-
ten, father of defendant, plaintiff alleg-
ing that defendant had entered into a
verbal contract with her to this effect.
Lowenberg & Coen, attorneys for the
plaintiff.
E. S. Parker VS.. w. H. Hubbard and
Alex Wells. appeal Of suit on attach
ment case from justice court of W. J.
Berry Gilmore & Moon, attorneys
for the plaintiff.
A. A. Hamilton VS.. Ottumwa Iron
Works ct al suit for damages for
$217.73 Plaintiff claims that indebt-
| 80 o1%
with the Union Coal Co. for some cars,
which were paid for and never deliv-
cred. The plaintiff prays for Judgment
in the sum of $232.73. w. H. Heating
is the plaintiffs attorney.
Isaac Forbes VS.. c., R. |. & P. R'y.
Co., suit for damages in the sum OF
I S1,995 on account Of damages sus-
tanned by him by being thrown from
a passenger train of the defendant
company through negligence and care
lessness Of conductor and other
agents.. Jaques & Jaques are attor'
neys for the plaintiff.
4 Walter H. McElroy VS.. Antonio De
matteis, suit for damages in the sum
of $25.55 and costs. alleged to have
horse and buggy of plaintiff by prop
erty of defendant. Walter H. NIGEL
. roy, attorney for the plaintiff.
Mrs. Kate Brady VS.. City of Ottum
wa, suit for damages in the sum o.
/. $500 said to have been due for the
damage sustained to plaintiffs prop
erty through the defendant cutting
below the grade on North Marion
street. Tisdale & Heindel, attorneys
: for the plaintiff.
} Minnie Taylor VS.. John A. Strader
suit for damage in the sum of S., OOt
! for suffering mental anguish and hu