The times dispatch. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1903-1914, 1905-02-08
i BaileyCharge Trade. ! : q
\ Mormon q i Z Question \ 'Is' |
Aired. ,55a
iSLIC CE Of 3 I OREGON
ANNEXED TO UTAH. 4! |
Oklahoma and Indian Territory
Will Form New Common Il.
wealth and New Mexico An y: 81
Others Sale of Whiskey
Prohibited in Former.
Exciting De ebate.
INV BIy,,58sAd,ss,clated pr,c,sls,,,)


e s,5f III {By AssSclnted Prcss) Il.
8eig WA AslIINGTON, !, D. CT, February 7.---$
III continuous sitting ofs almost y ryls
hours tho Senate Mt q clock {. night
4 passcd the Joint statehood bill. AZ passed,
tho bill provides for tho admission q the
sta tcs 81 Oklahoma to be composed OF
III oklaholnaSand Indian crritory and New
Mexico, according to It's present bolr IN y Y
y daries, with Arizona eliminated
Exciting Incidents.
The long session ,yas cha rsct erzed IL g'y
v exciting incidents and B many NJ surprises "
u Bcglnnlng promptly upon the $coltsenli,g8
f5 IL III d II O'Clock. the Senate pro- eeded 70
consider the various amendments a which
had been .slggcsted by the Committee on
Territories. and which had beer, passed q
4 over. One Of tho first OF these taken
Dr, was tho amendment prohibiting the
- sale \ OF Intoxicating liquors. IN ;wha is
s now indian Territory FOR the next ten
III years This was displaced BY O. substi-
siptutsS offered by Mr. Galllnger, which e1-
tended the3 e3anlendmentS o tho; cnti Ire +St to
FOR d period OF twenty ono yea r, a. ~ this
IN was adopted by g vote of 8to l:s
5s Tile first surprise Of the day came
when the committee accepted nj F'oril-
M ker' amendment PROV ding for g q ser'a.S
sfntc vote by each Il OF tn r errl tories Of
iSs rIzoI,nS ana Ne Mex leo on the Consti-
3 ions tO II ID adopt ed III by y tho proposed
state 81 q d Arizona 4 That provision had
sca rcely been MA de d. part ot q ne o. piii
5wiicn Mr.. Bard rcsente ed lliss amendment
which had been gina i tfered by ~ ~ s..
Si.,1,S
admission OF New M exico y as q state il1,
" wittout Arizona. II The arncndr Mt proved
No uoI around whitehall tho
lS proceed lngs of, finpor 81
~ a u first adopt I'd close pos
.s ID 10 1,liis vote was ken while Ath9
senate wns ittinE In Gom!rnltt 9 81 lls as
Whole. and was reversed In the senate.
proper by a tie Evot 3ofs 81 70 SO ISL
Arizona Ee # Out .43a s5sy
=, & aen,,e n tly tho Senate adopting an
amendment offered by Mr.. s1sa con- deciued !,
NJ q vote OF as to t36 to rely el
a,,a VI New Mexico and "a rizoila ~ ON thc
&hillI FS1'his result lad hard be ell an
nol,nced when Mr.. Ba rd, IN slig igntaS Y Wy
changed form. renewed II his .proposl1lol'
Tor tho admission Of New NJ eSico, as as q q
state. and this time tho amendment pre-.
e aI,ad 'hva the vote or a to 81. One Of
~ ~ 4 affirmntiye vet es was, however cast $,
q i,v Mr. Beycridge In charge OF the y, Diti,
for tho purpose OF moving the 4recpnsMldcr M 81
alton Of the vote. lie was prompt IN en- =
n terine this nlotionsns soon as me 8Tesuis
M va announced. I; but the motion WAS rs ~, IA
@ mon TIC table by a vote Of 80 fto. 3s. The
cffcct 1wns to eliminate Arizona from the.
Viii and to- establish a State OF " eW
i5 ninxico and & another Of Oklahoma ana
indian Territory. In this form tho Il ptli lsl
passed. 4. !, y. !, 4.
The vote by which the Bard amendment
vas stina.iy adopted is fis follows gS5
Yeas--Aiger, Bailey. Bare. 4 70 te, l5e rry'
I Reycridge,1 Blac ckburn. Carnlack Clark,
iss I - 8 Montana; clay. Cockrell. 1. Culberson8
Daniel Dubois, Elkins, Fora kerr Foster.
3of 81 .ouisana:S Galllnger, G; bsont Gornlan,
Hansbrough. Hepburn. Latinier. Ms-
Creary, McCumber, Nc Emery, n McLaurl'l,
r. Mallory, Martini, Morgan Ne@lands,
Simmons, Stewart Stone, Tallaferro.
BNays--A len /, IS Allison, Ankeny, Ball
J2urnham gBurroWs.i Ciupp, Clark, of NVy-i
3io,ning: Clarke, OF Arkansas ;s Cullon,5 " r
& Depew ~, Dick. Dietrich, pi lliighan', y:
oliver Driden, FAIRBANKS, F'oster.,1 q 1 q q
Washing on: ( Frye, Fulton, Gamble. Hale
Hopk kins, kcan, Kearns. III ttridge, LODI &c,
Long McCon,s, M llard, Nelson, Pl,tt
4 of Connecticut; Proctor. Quarles, Scott
h Sinoot,s Spooner. Il 8. II
Bailey Charges Trade
The defeat Of tho Bird nnlnln:l ns't " y
Inc senate after It had been adopted IN
VIC Committee In Whole gave riScat 70 some
interesting Incidents Mr.. Bailey y sint1; y !,
mated that there lad been q trade. !.
regarding the ador,tion = mn frMmfG,nrdn|'nt n
'rhe Mormon question ais J 4 reee'ilS'etd q IN
airing during the, day. ,.5 !. /. u !. :
while tho pi 3vi.ipn for the separate
admission or New Mexico va !, under con.
sideratIon, Mr. y lturroWs, chairn3anslgl,on \, 9 q
n the Committee ons I'riyilNces and l p et-
v bIll, ana stated hat 1t WINS due " alhe
practice Of polygtmy In that tarrltAry J,
IA s,chf an extent that t he consld dered it
ili.nwise otake the admission taw az IRON =
1.-The Federal authorize .,
8 Mr., Dubois and MI, Nc conas lpnd Mr, ! I !
Platt ii OF 4, Connecticut, eferred VI TO the
question of polygilmy ana to the o., reVeln, ,l,,
tIong before the committees. The BILL
originated In the House and Will so 70
L conference. I6lt n. !,
The Galllpger amendment WAS dehn ted
4 by several senators, Including MessFs'
Morgan ana Clay, Mr.. stono. atlyoHttted {,
Y tho amendment; Mr.. Mcl4aprl1 oppo,sseed
Ia itas an interference with the state u ~,
and Mr.. Morgan said he would fnyoT.tt
\, II domestic wines could no excepted, w
Teller and Mr., spooner spoke y sslpno ort
~ OF tne SUDStlIulc, ttltsA f'eSs''s tA,'N'.
.Iancon, Honburn Foraker and Mlllnry
against ii. The opposition was hused on
Tie ground that the provision c0ntG1nr
e eplated an Interference with the pollee
#powers J OF 81 State ,Ehe slbstl ute was
"A carried by IA vote of 55 to 90. There Wn $
l m division on party lines on. 5tlf Vote'
Polygamy in New Mexico,
During the discussion OF the Bard
8 amendment, Mr. Burrows ann nounced5 his
opposition toiltlle admission o Y NeM =,
M hnmbshell into the d dlscnssion, He based hls
SnmtagonIsnl on the 'eyelat ions concern,
Ing Mormonlsrl,, which have bee mads ma
(contipued on Third Fage,l