The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1905-11-24

VIM sToDARr,
E K BULL
J. a; SCOTT,
7. WATT,
Committee Manufacture.
I like say with Mr. Williams report
the first OF last grinding the price of
considerably different from asked him
figure the polarization that would best that
of which, know above four cents delivered
in New York and also the which would best
deliver in San Francisco You will undoubtedly know that the
New York contract differs from the San francisco contract The
New York contract IN general way calls tor the higher grade
OF sugar think could properly
make higher grade of whereas could ship lower
grades sugar profit
what effect the had both of these Mr.
with plantation who pretty high up calculations
of that 1t simple proposition simple
eral things His figures practically like
those OF Mr. Williams When it to write his report
Mr. Williams asked if he should publish it, and there
why thought he should publish the whole thing
a e ne n,g 4u1 the qe e OF waste Wa IN oasses very
but what all the planters here well the chemists
I mention the [ plantation which
did do As prominent plantation will mention
any Names know they money by gur
ing Our figures show that for the high prices had
Notwithstanding the New York encouraged sending
high-grade sugars coud-say high o8-that it
paid send sugar which polarized low 90 to New
York Of everybody knows you have got allow
least from oneour onehalf of cent for deerora
ton in sugar Hence, remember, & have the
OF than 90 San Francisco This however under
the prices starting with and according the formulas
worked
sugar San Francisco, in as high as 90 to %.
alud this because Mr. Williams has only partially given
his here The that take of that there
would have been had published the whole thing
and will that if the planters the result of figures
the subject would be glad send it Mr. Mead and have it
printed and distributed
Mr.. E E Hartmann-I will say that had correspond
with Mr. Williams this subject and did exactly
Mr. Williams in his calculations that the moisture
in all sugars whether 90 polarization the This
hardly applies We all know that the higher the poar
less the other conditions being equal
will particularly the dried If the
IS dollar
four about half dollar while five there ad
vantage of favor of 90.
The Charnan-You for the New York do you
Mr.. Hartmann?
Mr. Hartmann-Yes, the New York Of
there difference whether sugar dry For the
binary plantation sugar gain of ST o8 threecent
basis making polarlz1ng % compared with
advantage cents at
the vecent basis advantage of
the lower polarization. Now if the dry that
the brought down
only of % poarizaton and five
SO favor of polarization of Hitherto such cacua
tons made but roughly 1t Mr. Williams who recently
brought this subject the the figures have given here
take everything into consideration.
The Chairman think that Mr. Williams first figured
roughly, when told him wanted the figures, and possibly
the figures he handed the rough know, how
that he afterwards thoroughly 1t
subject and would this connection that
opinion that should all possible ship grade
OF and keep grade of polarization,
(o change it much) according
the
desiring that they compare their
figures 1t is good thing compare results of that
Are there any who like any
other OF the of the Committee Manufacture?
Mr.. Renor-Ar Williams here his
(reads): 1T doubtful reduce the