Herald and news. [volume] (West Randolph, Vt.) 1878-1943, 1905-05-11
WINDSOR COUNTY COURT.
Outline Of the Docket for Coming
June Term.


1 Outline OF the Docket for Comm
June Term.
The docket for the June term of Wind
sor county court is out. The term begin
Tuesday, June 9th, Seneca Haselton pre-
siding Judge. Charles n. Maxham AM
Milo 5. Buck assistant judges, Jay Rea,
Pember clerk, Charles Batchelder state
, attorney, Henry III. Peck sheriff, Eugen
A. Thomas bailiff. John III. Mimms report
, er, and +. c. SOuthgate probation officer.
The following are deputy sheriffs in thi
county:-E. Z. Cushman, Bethel; Fred c
shedd, Cayendish; William p. Dodge
Chester; Henry A. Bell, Chester: DAME
NJ. Hufnail, FeIehville; Levi b. Moore
ludlow; Frank A. Hayden, Ludlow; Free
! w. Fitzgerald, Norwich; Paul c. Tink-
ham, Rochester; Marvin II. Hazen, Soutt
Royalton; Wilson s. Lowell, Springfield
F. ID. Gin, Springfield; Wallace S. Fair.
banks, Springfield; James W. McDermott
Tyson c. J. Winship, Weston; Romano
A. Spafford, White River Junction; Rich
ard 4. Hoar, White River Junction; An
gus MacAuley, Wilder; James II. Kiniry,
Windsor, and Eugene Thomas, Wood
stock.
The following cases OF interest to the
north end Of Windsor county appear on
the docket
Thomas Maddred vs.. William Quinlan,
gen. asspt.
Mary Bowen vs.. Allen Bowen, divorce.
National w. r. Bank vs.. Merrick Sylves-
| ter, case.
j. G. Sargent, exr. Ellen Segur, VS..
William r. Blossom, note.
James MannIx vs.. Mary E. Rogers, gen.
asspt.
Fred j. Robinson VS.. Q. NJ. Ford, gen.
asspt.
S. B. and s. V. Co. VS.. o. N. and A. n.
Stoughton, book acct. g.asrs
F. V. Hassam VS. John r. Topper, book
acct.
Fred NJ. Manley vs.. Charles L. Rogers,
troVer
In re est. zebedee Churchill, appeal from
probate.
Clinton Luce vs.. F. v. Hassam, case.
Frank Z. Churchill vs.. Ella j. Churchill,
divorce.
Clarence Davis vs.. Seth Jones, gen.
asspt.
c. c. Ellis VS.. Daniel Durkee, asspt.
In re est. OF f. +. Holt, appeal from pro
bate court.
Bert Gay vs. Fred Bacon, replevin.
Storrs a Washburn vs.. Homer Douglass,
gen. asspt. and note.
Nathan Hale VS.. Moses Daniels, gen.
asspt. and note.
Ella j. Churchill vs.. Frank c. Churchill,
divorce.
Tarbell q Whitman vs.. Horace Clifford,
ct ais, asspt
Eta Bydm vs.. George Richardson, gen.
asspt
". E. johnson vs.. c. c. Paine, ct ais,
asspt.
Flora B. Cady vs.. Chester E. Cady, d.
vorce.
Frank II. Burrows vs.. Ethel Burrows,
divorce.
Eliza NJ. Rattee VS.. julie Rattee, divorce.
Bertha 5. Allen vs.. Willie w. Allen, di-
yorce.
Seventeen appeals by the Bethel Granite
Railway Co. in the matter Of the appraisal
for land damages. These cases have since
been all settled.
William Eastman vs.. Frank Stoughton,
trespass.
John B. Goodrich VS.. B. F. Kicker,
fraud.
Edna Louise Quirin vs.. Edward Noah
Quirin, divorce.
In re Milton Chamberlin, spendthrift,
appeal from probate.
Persis III. Belknap VS.. q. l.. and Lucy
Shortt, asspt
Nanlora Aikens Harrington VS.. Andrew
E. Harrington, petition for support, etc.
Ella Mary Dunbar VS.. Willis Eugene
Dunbar, divorce.
Q. NJ. Ford VS.. A. W. Bowen, gen.
lsspt.
Daisy H. Noonan VS.. John E. Noonan,
divorce.
STATE CASES.
Ethel Burrows, gross lewdness.
Walter Aitkens, burglary.
Leon Atwood, burglary.
Daniel w. Wilbur, liquor.
CHANcERY DOCKET.
j. +. Stafford VS.. Bethel Electric Light
md Power Co.
r. w. Rood VS.. Walden White.
Dubois and NanTassel Bros. vs.. A. A. I
Brooks, ct ais.
Paul c. Tinkham vs.. John Green and
los. Bean.
$. c. Durham vs.. Bethel Electric Light {
nd Power Co.
White River Electric Co. VS.. Bethel |
Electric Light and Power Co.
Emma r. Hale vs.. Moses A. Daniels.
In the state case against ID. w. Wilbur
bove mentioned, an entry was made {
Dec. 30, 1904, sentencing respondent to pay !
fine OF 300 and costs, with alternative
entence in the house of correction, and I
rdered that execution be stayed and re-
pondent placed in the hands OF the pro- J
alton officer until further order OF the {
curt, the condition of probation being Y
hat respondent shall not in any way /
reak any OF the criminal laws OF the state I
nd that he shall comply with such other {
onditions as the probation officer may Y
anne for his convenience. a