New Ulm review., 1905-04-26

warranted it. The challenge was with
drawn. The state withdrew its chal-
lenge for actual bias and Mr.. Stewart
was sworn as the eighth juror.
John s. Hotaling of this city was
called. The defense challenged for ac-
tual bias. and the state admitted it.
/ A. D. Scululin of South Bend was
challenged by the defense for actual
bias. He read of the case in the Free
Press and st. Paul Daily News. He had
an opinion from what he had read and
heard. and thought that it would influ-
enee him if he was on the jury. The
state admitted the challenge.
David E. Crane of South Bend had
read of the case in the Free Press and
i st. Paul Pioneer Press. The defense
challenged for actual bias. Mr.. Crane
said that he had formed an opinion
based on what he had read and heard. If
called to sit on the case he would try to
LAY aside the opinion. He felt sure
that he could lay it aside. the triers
found the challenge not true, after some
discussion The defense challenged
i |peremptorily.
Sherman E. Blake of this city was
challenged by the defense for actual
bias. He had formed no opinion as to
the guilt or innocence of the accused.
q The triers found the challenge not true.
4 TIE state challenged for implied bias,
and the defense admitted it.
E. A. Gibbons was excused by consent
of both sides.
Erie A. Engwalson of this city was
challenged by the defense on the ground
of implied bias. He said that his broth
er married sister of Mrs. S. B. Wilson.
The court found the challenge not true.
Mr.. Engwalson said that he takes the
Free Press and Minneapolis Tribune.
The defense challenged for actual bias
The juror said that he formed an opin-
ion at the time of the New Ulm trial
and still has it, and it would require a
good deal of evidence to remove. The
! challenge was admitted.
Seyert Olson of this city was called
The defense challenged for actual bias.
The juror said that he formed an opin-
ion during the trial, mas it still, and it
would take some evidence to remove
the opinion. He did not think that his
opinion would influence him if on the
jury. The triers found the challenge
: true.
this city, said that he takes the Free
Press and st. Paul Dispatch. The de-
: Tense challenged for actual bias Mr..
!. Kusche said that at the time of the
:. New Ulm trial he had formed an opin-
ion and still has it, and it would take
: some evidence to remove it. The state
admitted the challenge
: Ole Flo, a Rapidan farmer, said tnat
! he had read of the case in the Free
Press and Minneapolis Journal. The de-
!. Tense challenged for actual bias. Mr..
s Flo said that he had an opinion that it
!. would require some evidence to remove.
+ If enough evidence was introduced on
{ the other side he would change his
! mind He thought he could try the case
. fairly and impartially. The triers
I found the challenge true.
! Daniel Haenel of South Bend said
T. that he takes the Free Press, Forum
j. Stock and Home, and German paper
!. from Nebraska. The defense challenged
( for actual bias, and the state admitted
\ it.
+ David S. Evans of this city was chal
+ lenged by the defense for actual bias
+ He takes the Free Press, Minneapolis
/. Tribune and Lake Crystal Union. Ht
i has had an opinion from the first, anc
:. it has been strengthened as time went
! on. He did not think that he could
: try the case impartially. The challeng'
/ was admitted.
+ Had Strong Opinion.
+ John A. Nilsson of this city was chal
/ lenged for actual bias He takes tn
+ Review and several other papers. H
+ formed an opinion and still has it an,
+ he didn't think tnat anything could ge
+ it out of his mind. Replying to MI
j Wilson, the Juror said that the sworl
{ testimony in court would not outweig
( what he had read and heard of the case
I ''Do you mean that your business re
E qlires you at homer" asked Mr. Wilso
! with smile.
- "No, do not mean that" replied Nj
ITO Nilsson. 81 mean that | nave made u
u my mind and cannot change it now
w The challenge was admitted.
us J. D. Taylor of South Bend say
Mt. that he takes the Free Press, Farmer
a. Tribune and Orange Judd Farmer. Th
defense challenged for actual bias Th
VI. juror said that he has an opinion in tn
he case and it would take pretty stron
,ot evidence to remove it. He did nc
u, think that ne could sit in the case an
: try it, The challenge was admitted.
ate l. A. Cary was called The defens
had no challenge, and the state cha
lenged for implied bias The juror sal
that he was heartily opposed to capit'
s punishment, and he did not think tha
he could vote for conviction. If he too
an oath to decide according to his JUDI
es- ment, he would do so, knowing that /
es- had nothing to do with the punishmen
ols His feelings would not influence hi
der in this case. The court found the cha
TO lenge not true. The state challenged fl
ool actual bias. The juror said that he tax,
the the Free Press and Minneapolis Jou
rye nal. He had no opinion as to the gui
nee or innocence of the accused, from VIII;
EN- ne had read or heard.
llie 'sDo you believe what you read in Il
are papers?" asked Mr.. Wilson.
"If we didn't believe some of it, Y
,er wouldn't know anything" replied M
erk Cary.
IRE Mr.. Cary said that the impressit
to made ON his mind was very slight, al
| 4