New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1905-04-26

challenged for actual bias. Mr.. Bak-
er said that he had some opinion that
would require evidence to change The
triers found the challenge true.
Ransom Barr of lie Huillier said he
takes the Free Press The defense chal-
lenged for actual bias and the triers
found the challenge true.
l.. f. Van Dusen, a travelling man,
formerly of Grand Forks, N. D., said
that he had read and heard about the
case. He had business relations with
Mr. Retzlaff, a member of the New Ulm
citizens committee. He takes the Free
Press and Minneapolis Tribune. He mad
an opinion that it would take evidence
to remove, but thought that he could
lay it aside and try the case fairly and
impartially. The triers found the chal-
lenge for actual bias made by the de-
Tense to be true.
George w. Sugden was challenged by
the defense for actual bias He had
read the Free Press, st. Paul Pioneer
Press and Minneapolis Journal. He had
an opinion that it would take consider
able evidence to overcome. The triers
found the challenge true.
Robert Jache was called and the de-
Tense had no challenge. He said that
he had known the defendants father
for ten or fifteen years. The state
challenged for implied bias. Jacne had
been at the defendants home about six
no conscientious scruples against capital
punishment. The state withdrew the
challenge and challenged for actual bias.
He read of the case in the Free Press.
At different times ne has different
opinions, and has one now that it would
take some evidence to remove. He had
not come to conclusion, and thought
that he could sit on the case fairly. The
triers found the challenge true.
Had Scruples.
Robert j. just was called and the de-
Tense had no challenge. The state chal-
lenged for implied bias. The juror said
that he has conscientious scruples
against capital punishment, and he could
not vote to convict, even if convinc-
ed of the guilt of the defendant. An
swering Mr.. Pfaut the juror replied that
now having been Informed that the
court imposes the sentence, he would
vote for conviction if convinced of
guilt, The court found the challenge
true.
r. FL. Eldred, a brakeman on the chi
cago & Northwestern road, said that
he takes the Free Press and Minneapo-
lis Tribune. The defense challenged for
actual bias, and the state admitted it.
Fred j. Rogers of South Bend said
he takes the Free Press. The defense
challenged for actual bias, and it was
admitted
Amiel G. Antoine of South Bend said
that he takes the Free Press and Min
neapolis journal. The defense cnalleng-
ed for actual bias. The juror said that
he has an opinion that it would require
considerable evidence to remove The
challenge was admitted.
w. T. Warwick handles the Free
Press, Review and Minneapoli Journal.
The defense challenged for actual bias.
The juror said that he had an opinion
that it would take much evidence to
remove. The challenge was admitted.
Fourth Special Venire
Judge Cray directed that special
venire for twenty-five jurors be issued,
returnable at p. m.
Geo. w. Turrittin was accepted by
the defense, and the other challenged for
implied bias. He said that he could
not vote conscientiously for conviction
where capital punishment is the penal
~. He would do it because he was in
structed by the court, but he would not
want to do it on circumstantial evil
dence. The challenge was found true
Judge Cray, just before ordering the
noon recess, told the nine jurors chosen
that if they wanted to attend church
tomorrow he would arrange it SO that
they could. They will have to agree