Ottumwa tri-weekly courier. [volume] (Ottumwa, Iowa) 1903-1916, 1905-10-19

| Amanda Darner VS.. Thomas G. Darn
er, suit for divorce on the grounds of
cruel and inhuman treatment and non
support, and that she be restored to
her maiden name of Amanda Vinson.
s. 3. Adler, attorney for the plaintiff.
Katie G. Cox VS.. James B. Cox, petit
ton for divorce on the grounds of
cruel and inhuman treatment and re-
fusal to support. Plaintiff also asks
for temporary alimony of $25 and $500
permanent alimony to be made lien
on homestead in Riverview addition. S.
o.. Adler, attorney for the plaintiff.
Hannah Leonard vs. John w. Leon
ard, petition for divorce on the ground
OF cruel and inhuman treatment and
Aambitual drunkenness. Plaintiff asks
for the custody of their six minor chill
dren, temporary alimony in the sum
of $3.50 and permanent alimony of
| $1,000 B. w. Scott, attorney for the
plaintiff.
Agnes Stewart VS.. George Stewart,
petition for divorce on the grounds of
non-support, habitual drunkenness and
cruel and inhuman treatment. She
prays for her maiden name Of Agnes
Bradshaw. B. w. Scott, attorney for
the plaintiff
Ida Hohl VS.. Edward Hohl, suit for
divorce on the grounds of desertion.
Kirby & Duke, attorneys for the plain
tiff.
Alice Brennan vs.. G. e. Brennan,
petition for divorce on the grounds of
cruel and inhuman treatment and non
support. Plaintiff asks for the custody
of their minor child and that she be
restored to her maiden name of Alice
Gillian. Jaques & Jaques, attorneys for
the plaintiff.
Lilly Simms VS.. Jesse Simms. petit
ton for divorce on the grounds of cruel
and inhuman treatment. Plaintiff also
asks for alimony in the sum of $500
and a further allowance of $50 as at
torney's fees. S. M. Hanshaw and E.
K. Dougherty, attorneys for the plain
tiff.
Kittie Bostick VS.. D. L. Bostick, suit
for separate maintenance on the
grounds of non-suppport Case dis
missed at motion of plaintiffs attor-
ney, E. K. Daugherty.
| Annette Straw vs.. William Straw,
petition for divorce on the grounds of
cruel and inhuman treatment. A. G.
Steck, plaintiffs attorney.
Rachel Ream VS.. Mallie Ream, suit
for injunction, restraining defendant
from interfering in any manner with
the plaintiffs rights in contract be-
tween both parties. Lowenberg & Coen,
attorneys for the plaintiff.
john S. Reno VS.. Mary E. Lemley,
and M. B. Lemley, foreclosure
Plaintiff prays for foreclosure
of mortgage given in the
sum of S225 that Judgment in that
amount might be secured. Clyde G.
Sparks, attorney for the plaintiff
Fannie Pearl King, ct al, vs. A.. W.
Mahon ct al, suit in equity. Plaintiff
asks that certain deed to property
| in Wapello county be set aside and
that defendant, A. W. Mahon, have no
right, title or interest in said
property. Smith & Lewis, attorneys
for the plaintiffs.
Willard Carver vs.. Melvin Davidson
petition TO quiet title in certain real
estate in Wapello county. Willard
Carver attorney for plaintiff.
E. S. Berry VS.. Levi Orman, ct al
petition to quiet title in certain real
estate in Wapello county Sumner
Siberell, attorney for the plaintiff.
| IL,
al, petition to quiet title in certain
real estate in Wapello county. D. H.
Emery, attorney for the plaintiff
E. Laas VS.. Nellie G. Smith et al,
foreclosure. Plaintiff asks for judg-
ment in the sum OF $591.80 on note
OF $3.50 and that the mortgage given to
secure the same be foreclosed. Jaques
& Jaoues, attorneys for the plaintiff.
N. S. Foling VS.. Isaac Waldoo and
Jennie Waldoo, foreclosure. Plaintiff
asks for the foreclosure of mortgage to
secure Judgment in the sum of $4,000
and attorneys fees, growing out of a
promissory note for $500. Smith &
Lewis, attorneys for the plaintiff.
Leman Carson VS.. John E. Craig and
F. G. Craig, foreclosure. Plaintiff
asks for foreclosure of mortgage that
judgment in the sum Of $771 be Sc
cured. Dannans & Brownson and w.
B. and H. R. Collins, attorneys. for the
! plaintiff
/ N. S. Polling VS.. G. A. Mcclure, ct. al.
foreclosure Plaintiff prays for fore.
closure of mortgage in the sum of $500
that judgment in the sum of 1851 so,
which includes interest, attorneys fees
and sundry items incorporated in the
note. Smith & Lewis, attorneys for
the plaintiff.
Peter Bennett VS.. George Goings ct
al, foreclosure. Plaintiff demands
judgment against defendants in the
sum of $1,000 on two notes and reason
able attorneys fee, and that a special
execution be issued for sale of mort
gagged property to satisfy judgment
Walter H. McElroy, attorney for the
plaintiff.
i e. B. Hockreiter VS.. Charles ]. Kobel
} petition in equity. Plaintiff asks thai
defendant be enjoined from maintain
ing tile drains which allow water te
empty into plaintiffs land, and thai
damages in the sum Of $500 be decreet