The Sisseton weekly standard. (Sisseton, Roberts County, S.D.) 1892-1929, 1905-10-06
DISTRICT COURT
Nearly A Cases Continued to the
February Term.
TUES DAY OCTOBER /:

I
court IN and for Roberts county, con-
vened at the court house in this city
Tuesday, October 3. with Judge
Mccoy presiding, and f. L. Granger
as reporter From appearances the
term promised 10 be a pretty busy
one but before the first dav was over
the calendar was materially shorten
! ed 10y continuanueS, dearly all OF the !
terminal cases and a good many of
the civil cases were continued until
the February term. The calendar
shows seventy. three civil cases and
thlrty-siN criminal cases and is one
of the largest in the history of the
county. The principals event of i'm
portance on the calendar is the mu:-
der case of Zach Flute for killing
Colby and Peterson
AT the opening of court the states
attorney filed information against
Zach Flute, the Indian murderer
out owing to the absence OF Mr..
Seas, one of the attorneys for The
defense who was called home to at
tend he funeral Of his mother there
was NJ arraignmenJ or pleading III
the case at this time and the case
was set for Thursday.
The case of w. j. Thomas VS. John
Ahlen ct a was settled and stricken
from the calendar. and Roberts
county VS. H. A. Metcalf was also
stricken from the CALENDAR.
The following criminal cases We're
continued till the February term:
State VS. Jud Pelter, grand larceny
State VS. Paul Schmidt, petit lar
ceny
State VS. Sam l.. Cochran, setting
0 prairie fires.
! State VS. Daniel j. Wilson; dlspos-
l ing of mortgaged property.
State vs. Cnas. Block, Sr. and ChaS
Block. Jr., violating fish law.
/. State vs. Charles III. Grant. violat-
{ ing liquor law. two counts.
I State VS. Charles II. Grant and
Joseph Roberts, violating liquor law.
State VS. G. w Penn vi t. assault
d, appeal Justice Court.
State vs. Harry Horton, violating
@ liquor law.
State VS. Bert Horton, James Ry-
an and Harry Horton, violating Ii
. quor law.
State VS. Charles u. Grant and
Peter Hoban. violating liquor law.
State VS. Geo. Schmidt assault,
appeal Justice Court.
State vs. Charles f. Block, ST as
y sault with intent to kill.
State vs. julius Schmidt, bond u
d keep peace.
e State vs. Thos Gail. burglary,
e State vs. Veronica Steppa and
$ Pauline Steppa, larceny.
State vs. Tho>. lronheart, kidnap
IS ping.
y State VS. Chas IL, Grant and Pete
l. IIoban, violating liquor law.
d. State vs. Charles ii Grant. violat
1T ing liquor law.
State VS. Louis Gebert. assault
IT with dangerous weapon.
10 State vs. Peter Stevens and Tbeo
J. dore Nelson, violating fish law
State vs. Ray Urich and Edward
Shaw, grand larceny
State VS. Henry Smith, burglary
State VS. G. w. Arfstrom, mali
ciouS shooting
State VS. Andy Fisher, violalu!
. liquor law.
AZ State VS. Mack Husban.
Civil cases continued were:
III kolilz VS. w. III. Martin
Henry S. Morris as rec eiyer vs.
s, Peter Martin.
M Charles +. Block Jr., 10y Guardian
u, VS. Bonnie Schmidt.
ne Albert Lekvold vs. Peter A. Lar
We soE.
Emma j, Woodman VS. City o
f. SiSSetun.
is Summit Hdw. & imp. Co. vs. FRS
w State Bank of Summit.
re Waletich g. Plutvs Nelson & Pet
~ erson.
Henry Goepel VS. j. A. McKeeve,
ct al.
III Josephine Olson VS. a. II. Dahl az
sheriff
ID. f. sanders VS. Northwestern
Imp. & w. Co.
Anton Gilbertson VS. L. o. Luud.
:, Stephen Barnett VS. Michael Per
-. manlgen.
A. w. Lindquist VS. John Ezekll