Arizona republican., 1905-10-29
THE ACQUISITION
 REACHES ITS END
The Final Report of the Gland Jury
 Lacking in SensatiOnalism.

The grand jury submitted it's final | report yesterday morning and was dis charged. Those who were looking for | some things sensational were disap- l pointed. The only indictment returned | was one against Pablo Dlaz who had l been previously indicted for grand ! larceny. The report was brief. It re- | capitulated the work of the week showing that thirty-seven cases had been investigated. twenty-nine indict- ments had been returned and eight | cases had been dismissed. The report added that nothing in connection with the county offices requiring investiga- ton had been brought to the attention of the grand jury, and therefore the usual inspection of the offices had been dispensed with.
 Pablo Diaz pleaded not guilty to the previous indictment which had been returned against him and his trial was set for November 9. Juan Vajeca pleaded guilty to theft of a bicycle and he will be sentenced tomorrow. In the cases of the indictments against the Daggs brothers. four in all pleas of not guilty were entered and the cases were set for trial on November g. ItI is not at all likely that all of them will be disposed of on that day.
 On the civil side of the court a de- cree of divorce was granted Edith A. Collins against E. B. Collins. The case of the Gas, Water and Investment company against Elijah Coffin was re- set for November 1. Tle trial of the case of J. B. Daugherty against M. D. | Novinger was reset for December G. 1 demurrer in this action will be ar | gued next Saturday. In the various in | junction suits of W. A. Giles. Frank l 
 Land company against the Appropria- ' tors Canal company demurrers were ! overruled. the defendant not insisting. | These cases had been disposed of. at ! least temporarily. last Saturday in the ! condemnation proceedings by the Ap- | propriators against the plaintiffs in ! the injunction suits, the Appropriators having been put in possession of the ! disputed property, in the meantime | giving bond pending the final disposi- | tion of the case
 The damage suit of James K Lloyd | against the s. F. P. 6 P. was dismiss ed on the motion of the defendant the i plaintiff having failed to file a cost bond. The trial order was vacated . in the case of Albert Steinfeld against Aurora L. Seass Hansen and others In the case of James H. Pershing
  company, Norton and Christian moved to set aside the default and to file answers on behalf of the defendant. A demurrer was also oVerruled in the case of E. A. Spaulding against Lulu G. Porter. The suit of c. II. Christian against the Buckeye Land and Canal company was dismissed without cost to either party.
 In the somewhat interesting case of Carrie A. Lount and others against Thomas Hayes, a motion to file a. sup plemental complaint was granted. This action was begun last April to restrain the defendant from selling a farm the title of which IS in him. Mrs. Lount and her sister had furnished the money to secure the title to the land several years ago. It was permitted to in Hayes name it be- ing understood that as long as he lived he should en- joy it as a home. When it was found that he was making arrangements to sell It to w. H. Nall the suit was be- gun.
 In the supplemental complaint it is alleged that the sale was made not be- fore the filing of the lis pendens, but since then Nall and his wife nave given Hayes mortgage for $11,0OO on the property, this being supposed to the purchase price. It is aI- legged that the plaintiffs fear that Nall and his wife will transfer the property and Hayes the mortgage to innocent and it is asked that they be restrained from doing so. A tempo rary order was issued on the filing of a bond in the sum of S5,OO0. The or der will expire tomorrow.
 
 We now nave just what you have been looking for, for a long time. Boiled cider for mince meat Melczer