The Dolores star., 1905-02-03

yard piles lumber there In an unsta-
BILE manner is held. in Busse VS.. Rog-
ers (Wis.). Ga l. r. A. 1888. to be liable
for injuries caused by its fall upon .
child who. while travelling along the
street, follows its inclination to play
and attempts to climb upon the pile,
and thereby causes the lumber to fAll.
Land dedicated as public highway
Is held. In McAlpine VS.. Chicago Great
Western Railroad company (Kas.), Ga
l.. r.. A. S5. not to revert 70 the dedi-
Gators because of misuse or nonusc.
unless It's use for the dedicated pur-
pose has become impossible or 10
highly improbable MS to be practically
impossible.
The driver OF a milk wagon. Who.
knowing the existence OF a manhole
to sewer which projects above the
surface OF the street, attempts to turn
his horse and wagon around In It's
vicinity without paying any attention
to his course. is held, In Wheat VS..
st. Louis MOI. "a L. r. A. 1872. to be
! guilty OF contributory negligence, 30
ehoe- hh SooS TIC Wokou stIIheS tu6
obstruction and Is overturned to his
/ injury. he cannot hold the city liable
| therefor.
The implied powers which a corpo-
ration has in order to carry into effect
| those expressly granted and to accom-.
| plish the purposes II its creation. are
held. in Central Ohio N. G. L. +. com.
pany vs.. Capital City Dairy compony
! (OMo). 81 l.. II. A. sos, not to be lim-
tied to such as are Indispensable for
these purposes. but to comprise all
! that are necessary in the sense OF ap-
. propriate. convenient and suitable, In
| Guiding the reasonable choice OF m cana
to be employed.
An indorsee Of negotiable note
taken as collateral security for pre-
existing debt. there being no extension
OF time of payment or other new ss,n.
sideration, is held, in Birket vs.. I'D
! ward (Kas.). 81 L. r. A. 56S, to be- Q
holder for value and in due conrse Of
business; and, in the absence OF sny
circumstances charging him with no
tice. to be protected against CLAIM, OF
! payment made to the original payes.
A chattel mortgage duly recorded In
one state is held, in Snider vs. Yates
| (Tenn.). 64 l.. r. A. 353, not to be en-.
titled, under the doctrine of comfy. to
be given priority by courts OF another
etatc, to which the chattels are Ie-
moved, over local attaching creditors
who had no actual notice Of it. The
other authority on conflict of laws a.
to chattei mortgages are reviewed in
a note to this case.
An act providing an eight-hour day
for all wori,ingmen in mines, smeltcrs
and mills for the reduction Of ores IL
sustained In re Boyce New, 65 L. r.
A. Al. All the other authorities on lin.
itation of hours of labor by statute or
ordinance are considered in a nots to
these cases.
The right Of the legislature to pro
vide for the destruction OF intoxi-
eating liquors kept for illegal sale,
without granting their owner a Jury
trial. is sustained in Kirkland VS.. state
(Ark.) 65 L. R. A.. rs.
A stutute prohibiting solvent mer.
chants. under penalty. from disposing
OF their stocks in bulk without giving
notice to their creditors is held, in
Block VS.. Schwartz Utah) 65 l.. A. r.
Sos, 20 be an unconstitutional depriva.
tion of liberty and property.
| The increase of stock is held, in
| Cooke VS.. Marshall (Pa.) GA l.. r. A.
413. not to be within the implied pow.
| ers OF corporation.