The Baltimore County union. [volume] (Towsontown, Md.) 1865-1909, 1905-09-23

In his charge to the grand jury Judge Fowler
said:
1T has been alleged In respectable newspapers
and by the representatives of associations and
good-order leagues, composed Of reputable resi-
dents of this county, that gambling was openly
conducted at Timonium during the recent ex-
hibition. It is your privilege and your duty to
investigate carefully these serious charges, and,
should you find them satisfactorily sustained,
you should not hesitate to present the parties
implicated. ..,o, :, .,.o o.,,os - ~. a,,.o.a
violations of the gambling and liquor laws in
those districts lying adjacent to the city of Bal
timore, but more particularly to the fact that
one or more of the associations of citizens just
mentioned have openly made the most damaging
and serious charges against our county police
officers and the county government generally.
should the charges be Sustained by prima facie
proof, presentments should follow"
The following cases were disposed of Ed,
Seig VS.. Frank Page, S1164S: State. use of Dor
sey Haberkorn. infant, vs. William 9. Dorsey
Lumber Company ana w ,daI =: dorsey lHog
use of Virginia Parrish ct al. VS.. John Klohr and
William e. Shirley, suggestion and affidavit for
removal filed; Benjamin f. Bayne vs.. United
Railways and Electric Company, suggestion for
removal fled Chase Store Company VS.. William
II. Evans. removed to Court of Common Pleas;
Ella Taylor VS.. Western Maryland Railway Com
pany, suggestion for removal filed; Robert e.
Boarman and John Grason vs.. Charles T.. Cork
ran. suggestion for removal filed John Mueller
vs.. Consolidated Gas Company, County Com
missioners of Baltimore county and the High
ways Commission of Baltimore county 1.-TWO
casesJ suggestions for removal filed.
The Gottschalk Company vs.. Charles j.. Gray;
plaintiffs appeal from Justice Pfeffer, Judgment
HeSm mt for pant for and anu
Charles e. Weakley vs. Andrew Meisnerl
plaintiffs appeal from Justice Herbert, judg--
ment below for defendant for costs; reversed
and judgment for plaintiff for $40 and costs.
William T. Tracey vs.. John w. Wisner, admin
istrator: defendants appeal from Justice Her,
bert, Judgment below for plaintiff for 5000
debt and $l.s5 costs; tried before the Court and
held sub curia.
Theresa Hanneman VS.. William J. Carl plain
tiff's appeal from Justice Pfeffer, Judgment be-
low for plaintiff for 1878 debt and $l.B5 costs;
reversed and Judgment for plaintiff for $7.44,
each SIDE to pay his own costs, and Judgment
a. Edelstine vs. William Katzoff defendants
appeal from Justice Pfeffer, Judgment below
for plaintiff for $40 debt and SLIGO costs; appeal
dismissed.
Same VS.. same: appeal from same justice.
judgment below for plaintiff for $42 and $l.65
George G. Thomas VS.. Constantine Lynch; de-
fendant's appeal from Justice Whiteley. judR-
ment below for plaintiff for $685. debt and $3.50
Same vs.. same; defendants appeal from same
justice, judgment below for plaintiff for $79.95
debt and $3.50 costs; appeal dismissed.
William T. Gambler use of, etc., vs. Mary POb-
let's and Charles Pobletts; defendants appeal
from Justice Orrick, judgment below for plain
Alexander s. Petit and Kate NJ. Petit VS..
William A. Robertson: plaintiffs appeal from
Justice Pfeffer, judgment below for defendant
for costs.
WEDNEsDAy.-sept 2O.-Magistrates' appeals
continued:
William T. Tracey vs.. John w. Wisner, admin
istrator before reported. judgment below re-
versed and judgment for plaintiff for $3.50. with
interest, each party to pay his own costs,
Everett Bernhardt. an infant. by his next
friend. vs.. Thomas ]. Hurdle. defendants appeal
from Justice Pfeffer, judgment below for plain
tiff for S25: motion to dismiss appeal overruled
reversed without prejudice.
Alexander s. Petit and Kate M. Petit VS..
William A. Robertson. before reported, judy
ment in favor of plaintiff for the restitution Of
the possession of the premises, defendant to
pay costs.
The court discharged the petit jury until Mon
day. October I'd.