Gunnison news-champion., 1905-11-10
eases Au.LwW AveN A.


County of Delta,
In the Distric, Court.
ities q Right g the use "f Water FER Irrigation
urp"~es 10 Water District Number Forty. Of
the state 81 Colorado
Peter Nseel, N. Z. tonner. The Excelsior Fruit
COMPANY. n corporation. he Iaouis Fruit
tom M y. q corporation. TIL. mas 7 Dufield
ard NJ. h kennes,y, Lawln Johns. ID viii
hanson and Randolph illiamson, Josephine
!. france. O. h. borrsnce. &. {. Hawkins. A.
Patterson and A. Nutfing, petitioners
for the right g. change the point ~ diver-ion
ot certain waters from the Clark a Wade
aitch To the Turner ditch, and Theodore
t'eber. pc iiinner to change the point of
diversion Of waters fr, m the Clark Il Wade
ouch to the beaver Dam Ditch. all Ia said
tounty aud District Apl eilauts, vs.. The
MINI esota Canal A Reservoir Co. a corpora
tion, Fred brown, 7. o. Hester aud Aaron
~ ugh Appellees Order allowing appeal.
Peter Ntgei, N. p. Gnpner, the Excelsior
fruii cempa.y, corporation, Thomas Z.
Duiiieli sui N h. Kennedy, kiw in Johns, j.
d. Williamson and Randolph Williamson. doe
phine is france, q. d. france, G. &. Hawkins
NJ; fsttfrs u and A. II. Nuttine, and the
,f prioritIes numbprs one. two. seven AMI eight
her.ttt,Te deCIeed 10 the CLARK n Wade oitch
i,nlare mems, all in said Water District Forty
of THE state OF olo ado and ell pei eiitioners for
a decree permitting them to change tha point
of diversion o the Quantities of said pri, rites
owned hy them TO the Turner Ditch on said
Miunesots Gre, \ In said q unity and Water
District. from ssid Clark a Wade Ditch and
measureu ent. the waters of priorities one
two aud seven. heretofore decrerd to the Clark
Na1s ditch fram N 'uneseta creek, and its
ttr~t Enlargement, all ia said Water district
Forty, ani petitioner - deere permitting
HIM t. change the point of dis ersion of the said
anlur Mt ut said prl' rifles owned by him to the
Beaver Dam Ditch, on the lake Fork Branch
Of -aii Minnesoia re- H. in said water DisIricf
from said Clark Wade ditch. am all having
presented anu hicd their joint >TATEMENT
ON APFhAL. IN writ ng. duly verified nv M
daNit, properly en- IL ed IN he above eutit "a
court ana ~ ihr above entitled cause, statiug
III" cts required by law to be stare : and
pr yins an a. peal to III supreme ourt II the
state II dorado, ffUm the dacree euterad
herein 4n the y Gay OF septen ber A. y, is05,
T. b. Nliowrd to them Hs appellants. aeaiust
The Mit.ues"ta anal a Reserv, ir 4 ompeny
owner Of the Minnesota Canal the Minnesota
g. Brown, owners Of the sweez, A Turner ditch
and aron iot gh owner sf the tt ugh ttitrh
all situate IN aid Water District Foriy a. an
peiiee' and the court On examinati, n hsvire
found such stHtemeit { be an accorIance r,,h
the petitions and st4temenfs Il claim of each
- the appellant, anu with the statements ef
ue CONSOLIDATED et1tlon Of the appellants ard
letlti hers, ana with The plea fines filed herein
by ach ami all ~ appela and ann, llees ami
the court hasls further found that said ar
leiiaii's are ahe' ted IN common "a well a sew
erally' adverse to their sc ntentit u.s. pleadiucs
at.tturhts OF cl"im OF petitions, by sai id decree
So ushl 10 he appea lei fr m.
Ana u fnrther appearing that the said uefi
,'oGefs nave hled heir etItion fer re-arguuent
aud review upon the e,i fence heretofore aken
rn
sp"nieuts have BEN duly sery ed with unt;ca
,hsre'f, an that the same came on To- ba besri
i; ti We suase 81 s1id court at his Chan bers
aud STATE Fl Colorado aud the Ju, ge of ssiI
coutl hay ing heard said petition f,r no -.,.u
n htnt and review snd the argument Il cour' sci
therein unon the 2lrh day Of Uct,,ber A II
lsn, and the same wa denied. -
Now on mo, ion 4 ti,,udy & Twitchel. King
q q, a,.war'; VI, Il WEIGH aud NJ lizard Fairlamb,
a',ntness ipr PEI ltloners and appellants
ii II OhDtRtD, that the said statement
pe' ana The anne - hereby appra we'd and thst
IN appeal be, ana ths same j. her.b, ,IIowad
T. the supreme Court Il said state from tha
decree entered herein On the 2gth day of Sen.
1Ieuner' I''' 4. u; % and from the order f the
Judge 81 said Court denying the ppl ieation f,r
re- aigument and review on the III asy -
octoher, ID. l&h wherein Peter yoeei II p
,rn,s re E&ceisl1r Fruit G. mpany, a cor
y ia'h n the l. iaenih Fruit c. C'mpany a corror.
alton, Thomas h. u, field and If n kennad,
naWin Johns, j. ID. Williamson and Esn"'oi,'h,
Nlillhms' D, Joeephine u, france o X Drr
rance, 6. c. Hawkins, 4 NJ Psfferson ~
Nutilng. and Theodore Roeb.r ov.uers ,f sait
@ t@rlur,i' On e, tw'' seven and eight heretof,r re-
sofa REX, and lis irst aud Second Iniar,,e
rnents, in Water District Fsgty 81 80 $50
hsll ! ~ be appellants, and The Minnesota anal
RESERVOIR Company. /. o. Hester. Fred a
bfown and Aaron Clough shall he spneil.es "
AM - hEktbh RI BTHER okDEhED
Ro,5 ~ ~. ~, ioh OF saia appeal, that an Appeal
u - 'e ehectltefi by one more cf ssid
appeliants, ss principals, and hy two snf,;cisnt
1870 I.i 20 ne approved by this ourt or tho
W.
the payment of all costs which ,ns, T.. - - ~ ~
ssa.,.s saiI ~ AtI eiianfs, or any If them in the
az a I,llur our IN the penGl sum Of Five Hun
Irei i'nliars, shall be Il ed herein vithin ,aa
days from tins date "i'nih ten
Dhtrl 70 Nacat on at Nonfrosa. Colors5o !,
u. iH6 my VI october, A
THERON STEVENS, Judge.
sIAIEoF COLORADO
Comfy 81 Delta So
!, waiter Singleton. Clerk of tho D;s,ric,
4 -, ~ = ~ uetH "unty. IN Stste aforesaid do
-, lily th, above and foregoing to he a
,,f- - y iHft and complete cttpv of csrt.in
. wing appeal. which Was Fl lea .na
, i '.i',d - ni record cn the 18th day If Oct,hor
= a.. Ish. wi.er'-in Peter Nag,I. et al .r.ar
pelIsnts and The Minnesota tsnsi a Resarri
t.mp.ny. are eppell-a.s
~ Illness WHEREOF. have he,.r,.,,
set my hand nd stiireI To se.iat ~ tiss.euhto
az is, a. tiris 'sth aay g oct.,bcr A D. IsE
~ WALTER >iNifIFToV
bec Clerk II tho Dlstrlct Cont