New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1905-10-21

any position those companies for Pe d3ToH ss
conception of the duties OF s9ch poSi hi9 trust
that he could satisfactorily discharge ms ge
of himself or his friends? In the presence OF tne
life insurance investigation IS II not ee has
been in this smrched If not aItogeth b fose
And has it not given way TOO corporation ocer
director is simply man who mas the dll foT
his benefit. of opportunities for personal gam
which come to him as At trustee conception o.
government. Our candidate. Mr.. WINS, mas wei
Ta9 TINS se Whg should any man
willing to place in control of the citys interests
life insurance companies if he could. with whip
of small cords? Mr. Croker stated the thfG[y for
his own pocket all of the time" The history oa
often that emily the wilfully blind refuse to ses
it. The Mayor said last night that ms aGl
In Mr.. McCleIlsn's personal integrity 1 have the
most complete confidence
LIFE INSURANCE HONESTY.
But my quarrel with him is that he lends hims'Sf
cipie is inconsistent With either honest. efficient
that word, and in the same sense it may have been
system such as Mr. Plunkitt has described 5. in his his
recent booagan am indebted ss5 10 9nd r cannot be
efficient and cannot be economical in any just sense
of these WGrd Th I not OF steal dollar
from the city f0oE 6SI 'h The Books are ali hight
and everything is all right An thar t i In fter
their era friends within the law and gave them what
opportunities they could to make graft ,,eo .-s,r
This it would seem, is precisely the Ire lnsuF-
doctrine as revealed in some quarters ad
# is bighiy significant. as Mr. WINS has point
ed out that Mr.. Plunkitt's book is Endorsed in a
NAN HAN. / understand perfectly that the law
Of gravity operates in the same an way nve q @it and
know with equal certainty. that the prl9clpies On
respondng results. whether applied to life in
companies or TO the city government, dc
Of action to control in private affairs when they
themselves adopt such a pitifully low stanoara IN
MR. MAYER'S SPEECH
Attorney General julius NJ. Mayer. introduced
first by Mr.. Low. made a speech partly devoted
to an account of the political history of MI
WINS.
Mr.. Mayer said in part
Now Tammany. IN this campaigning It is
campaign against Tammany just as much now as
se ever mtcaiclIaton Doubtless, before in
the presiding officer made a YSf 10 from t the
TammanE Standpoint He probably referred to the
gentleman who " as last plsh 8e Mavor Of New
YoTk after the present Mayor might have finished
one Now ys'7 why by did Tanmany nominate Mr. 1, a
voice. Mcclellan on yes b tRaT Srn Inc him 5e
cause they thought that the Tammany ticket z was vas
,ipO
Took so bright for us. Well. why did they n9mlnate
McCiowan? Who is MCGOWAN? Does ahyoouS A4io"
MCGOWAN?
Ar oIeT Voice-N1urphy does Great laughter)
The Responsibility for the election in this cam
raign is upon the straightout Republicans, VINO
must If they would have the sincere support OF
others who differ from them in national affairs
- entirely true to this ticket that We are run
hing NE in the city Of Greater New-York (Appause)
De tr1Ie 10 the municipal question here IN
voved Of who shall be Mayor Of the city OF New W.
York and it beho9ves no Republican 10 nave cams ms
p9ign: neither be fooled that one man may be
PLIIni1p little faster than was expected and
Therefore that our should be changed; nor
tbat some other is not running quite as Wen
eiLf'L o1,ia he exnected We have had one OF thosa
eSneriences and that experience lost to the CITY
- TaW1-Yorly as its Mayor the Honorable IIneoI,
9ore Roosevelt (Voce: Three cheers for Teddy
Long continued cheering . .,., ,,. ,,o aro
ne NOT let US do that kind of thing again; we arc
older: we arc experienced; we nave NOR, more
odTsa I ct us remember that even in the oitter
Contest of 1902 100000 voted for the RepuphG4n
ccr,IiJate for the Governor of this great state we
have right this time to ask not alone those z94,go
for that perfect campaign, out uoSe
citizens that have referred TO.