The Hawaiian star., 1905-05-16

Continued from page one)

NCOullnueu lIOIn page OneJ
had done had been what Hustace ex-
pected him to do. Hustace replied in
the negative, saying that he had ex-
pected Magoon to bring suits for which
he was paid the $3.50 and Magoon again
returned to the matter of his being
satisfied" by the $3.50.
Hustace declared that Magoon evil
IDENTIFY was satisfied, for he had let
matters rest for a long time.
Did you understand that for the
payment of $3.50 I would be satisfied to
forego the collection of large judg
ment?"
mo, I didn't understand that you
were running the matter-Mr. Dee aD-
peared to be in charge Of everything
and he was continually after me to
have me transfer my property"
IT was receiving instructions from
Mr.. Dee?"
Yes, it appeared So"
Magoon produced the transcript Of
testimony in the case of Dee VS.. Smith
and called up testimony of Hustace
which appeared to conflict with his
statements of yesterday with regard to
the time dl WHICH, hdEbOll tlNNloNN llllll
that he was liable for the whole Ka-
malo judgment. Hustace said he
didn't recollect making the statement
quoted, and finally said he didn't be
lieve he made it.
Hustace positively denied that he
had testified as appears in the Dee
Smith case regarding the date on which
Magoon had advised him to transfer
,his property He declared himself
quite certain that he had not testified
to statements appearing.
"Why did you not follow your wifes
advice, as you stated yesterday and
see Mr.. Robertson before transferring
your property or before paying me the
R15O?"
"I thought it would keep you quiet
for a while"
What do you mean by that?
II didn't give it much thought at all
1 thought you would not do anything
for while"
Magoon pressed for an explanation OF
what this meant and Hustace finally
said 81 thought you and Dee were act
ing in good faith trying to help me out
Mr.. Magoon."
Il proposed that you buy the jSdg
ment and try to collect it from thu
other two defendants and you tried t.
raise the money and do it, did yo'
not?"
yes"
How then was 1 assisting you t.
avoid liability under the Judgment
81 understood you were not to pusl
me for the rest of the judgment"
"When did you first conclude tina
Mr.. Dee and I were trying to do yo'
dirt?'"
when l was in San Francisco"
WAS that the first time?"
"No, had been warned against you
Your reputation has been bad for put
ting up jobs on people,"
you knew that the Kamalo Suga
Company through me was levyng M
on your property why did you no
make some complaint that it was
breach of faith?"
Il didn't think it would do am
good"
why didn't you ask for the SIS
back?"
81 thought it wouldn't do any good.
you were willing to be robbed G
S15O?"
J ~
didn't seem TO want to return It,
never saw a sight Of it until the 81
preme Court got after you"
you accepted it then"'
"Yls, it came in very handy Nj
MagcOn
why had 30, you gone after me lt
t?s ~iSsth! aIiil 81
well, to tell the truth / didn't car
to have anything more to do vii
you"
Il don't blame you, after your e>
perience in the Kamalo case, for If eve
there was debtor gone after hard
was you. If ever man was scored !
court it was you"
you've been in the same boat M
Magoon."
Yes, but l got out of it. If eve
fraud was clear it was i'm your case
replied Magoon
1T was all technichaiity.'
l "The court didn't say so.'
The matter Of Hustace's being tr'
from further payments under the ki
malo judgment was gone into furthe
Hustace insisting that he was given
understand by Dee and Magoon lh'
under the new scheme proposed by ID