New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1905-05-03

emptied the barrel entirely out
and carefully sorted over the con-
tents. 1t was a sort of waste paper
basket, with a cover, and made some
, thing like barrel. The blue box was
close to the one where the blue bottle
was. | mad never seen 1t there before,
ana was surprised when 4 found 1t
there. l looked there at suggestion
from MI. hiause that the box might be
near the bottle. Never saw any blue
boxes IN 1t. GebhardSs office except the
two testified about.
On redirect, the witness said that the
box was further back in the pigeon
upper part OF the case, but don't re-
member whether | had to stand on a
stool to get it. Do not know whether
would have seen it if it had been
there before.
Miss Schapakahm made an excellent
witness.
| DR.. Reineke Called.
| Dr. =. r. Relneke was called. His
offices were to the rear OF the Gebhard
offices ana next to them, IN the Otto.
meyer block. Saw DR.. Gebhard last at
ten or fifteen minutes before nine
Eo'clock on the evening of Nov. lst. He
was in his laboratory, polishing plate
with his machine, which made quite
a noise. He wore long blue and white
working coat. AL of the lights in the
operating room and laboratory were
lburning. The light in the operating
room hung from the center of the cell
ing and was pulled over his desk by a
string. 1t was l6-eandle power light.
There was a similar light in the labora-
tory. the ligrt in the reception room
murder, and perhaps before that. The
reception room chairs stWere all in that
room, including two rockers. There was
no rocker in the operating room. The
screen usually stood behind the door
leading from the waiting room to the
operating room. There were two operat-
ing chairs III the room.
The noon recess was taken here. The
evidence this forenoon was the same as
that given by the same witness at the
New ulm trial.
The defense claims that the ribbon
on the typewriter has been changed
since last October.
This afternoon DIR. Reineke testified
to the condition that he found the Of
nee OF Dr. debhard after the murder
ana described '' the Dlooo marks. ms was
similar 10 the testimony gwen by ON
, er witnesses VINO were early on thf
scene. He had arrived at 10 P. m. Hs
: saw no evidences OF disorder, eithel
IN the leonard reception room or LAB
oratory. Ills own offices were not ilght
ed, he having put them out when III
went out about nine o'clock, The doors
were locked, except the one into TIT
: general waiting room. When ne enter
ed his office after the murder ne; fount
> one OF his windows open: There wer'
:. numerous plooa STAINS on the curtains
> ana ABOUT the Wlndo"' Inc screen ap
pearea 10 nave oeeh puiled OUT OF I'M
! frame at the sloe, ana was cut norl
zontaily tor loot at the BOTTOM ih'
y maps were curved outward ana never re
sumed their natural position. Ih
night OF the murder was quite DARK
discovered blood on the "lre' s'ralgh
'' out from the middle OF the WINDOW. In
/ mark was very plain and was thre
L. inches wide. The hook at the bottom
the window, by which 1T IS raised, wa
fuli OF blood and right around 1t wer
II some smears. LIT. 1epharu received
u package, but don't Know "hen ne 60
1t. Sa" 1t IN ms LABORATORY on I'll