The silver messenger. (Challis, Idaho) 1890-1912, 1905-08-15

block ~ be $500; that the i'm
provements on lot u block be
800.
TnaC the property assessed to
Ambrose Caro- and described as
lot IL block 9 be $50; that the
valuation of improvements be
! fixed al SIS
That the property assessed to
j. F. Hendricks described as lot
block IA be $50; that The valua-
tion on improvements be on said
lot Oe $3.50.
That the property assessed to
john Strunk described as lot 13
and IA of block 8 be $50 each;
that the improvements theron be
fixed at $3.50.
That the property assessed to
Geo. L. Morgan described as lot
u block 8 be $50; lots / and 2 in
block 5 be $40 each; aud lots 1,2.
II and IL block z, Riverside Ad-
dition, be s. each; that the inn
provements ON lot in block 5 be
1878, and the improvements on
lot 9 block 5 be $3.50.
That the property assessed to
Jack Heidi described as lot 8 in
block Is and lot 9 in block 90 be
10 dollars each; that the valua-
ton on improvements on lot 8 in
block Is be $50 dollars.
That the property assessed to
j. ID. Woods described as lots 90
and "a block be so dollars each;
lots z and 8 block 3 be 10 dollars
each; lot II block 10 be 10 dol
lars; that lot IL block ~ be 10
dollars; that lots z and 8 block 8
of Riverside Addition be 5 dol
lars each; that theimprovements
on lot z block 3 be $50 dollars.
AT this time appeared M. A.
Brown, attorney for r. o. Rus
sell. in his application to have
the assessed valuation on lot g.
block 6 reduced, and the valua-
ton of said lot was fixed at so
dollars.
In the matter of the assessment
of M. A. Brown for 1905.
AT this time appears said M.
A. Bown in his application for a
reduction in valuation of proper
ty described as lot 6 block Is of
1t was ordered that
said valuation be so dollars.
At this time appeared Frank
H. Olsen for a reduction of his
assessed property valuation at
1t was ordered that lot
l block II be so dollars; that lot
IL block / be 10 dollars.
At this time appears J. H. o.
sen by his attorney Frank Olsen,
ard asks for a reduction of the
assessed valuation of his Mackay
property. 1t was ordered that J
of lot 8 block 1 be 5 dollars and |
improvements on said lot be rs
dollars.
In the matter of the assess
ment of the Mackay Develop
meut Co.
At this time appeared N. H. !
Clark, agent, and asks for a re.
duction of assessment charged to
said corporation. 1t was order.
ed as follows: System of water
works 1000 dollars; lots in River.
side Addition, dollars each; lots
in resident part of town 10 dol |
lars each; lots on Main street SO
dollars each.
At this time appeared N. H. |
Clark for himself relative to his
in Mackay. 1t was
ordered that lots z, 9, 10, IL, 10
Of block IA and lots IL and IL of |
block % of Mackay be assessed
for 100 as prayed for.
At this time appeared Frank
Uhren for Frank Sweeney, and
asked for a reduction of assess
ment in Mackay. It;was order
ed that the valuation of said lots
% and 6-be 10 dollars each; the
improvements on said lots be
liked at 400 dollars.
At this time appears Frank
Jehren for John Shaner relative
20 assessment of Mackay proper
~. 1t was ordered that lots SO,
10. IL, IL, block 9 be 10 dollars
each; that lot z block IL be SO
dollars.
AT this time appeared Frank
Jehren for H. E. Gilbert relative
% assessed property at Mackay.
Il was ordered that lot 5 block
ID and lot 2 block 8 be so dollars
Zach; that the improvements on
said lot 5 block Is be fixed at
100 dollars.
At this time appeared Frank
Jehren for Burnett Bros. relative
% assessment in Mackay. 1t was
ordered that lot 6 block Z be 10
dollars; ] of lot IL block be 25