The Montgomery advertiser., 1905-11-07
THE EQUITY DOCKET
DEGREES MADE IN A NUMBER OF
CASES.


CITY Court of Montgomery. yesterday
morning took up the equity docket Of
the October term Of court and disposed
OF q number Of cases. Most of these
cases were petitions for divorce by
negroes. while several old cases were
dropped from the docket
Cases which were disposed Of were
Ixnatius Pollak VS.. r. M. Billing ct al,
two cases, to be dropped.
F.M. Billing VS.. Ignatius Pollak. two
cases, to be dropped.
James Chapel vs.. ]. T. Roberts. dis
missed for want Of prosecution.
Hanover National Bank vs.. r. M. Bill
ling; 1t having been shown to the court
that the defendant nas been adju iicat-
ed a bal krupt. the cause was dismissed.
Julia Carter VS.. Wash Carter. testi-
mony published and cause submitted
for decree on pleading and proof.
Montgomery Traction Company vs..
Montgomery Baseball. Association. dis
missed Without prejudice.
Mary Mcdonald vs.. Milton Mcdonald.
dismissed for want OF prosecution.
March w,lliams VS.. Mite Williams.
dismissed for went Of prosecution.
Eek psrte Della Taylor. dismissed for
want of prosecution.
Lewis Pierce VS.. Rosa Lee Pierre. dis
missed fer want OF prosecution.
missed for want of service.
Tom McAllister W.. Mary McAllister.
decree pro confesso on personal SER
vice.
Elizabe tn Merriweather VS.. Dave
Merriweather. dismissed for want Of
pros scItfon.
Emma Tolliver VS.. Charles Tolliver,
dismissed by plaintiff.
John Mcqueen VS.. Anna Mcqueen.
dismissed for want OF prosecution.
Sarah Thomas VS.. Hercules Thomas.
dismissed by plaintiff.
Henry A. Stokes vs.. Lucy M. Stokes,
dec ee pro confesso on personal service.
Eugenia Sellers VS.. ROBBIE Sellers, tes-
timony published.
Sam Wfngard vs.. Annie Wingard, dis
missed by plaintiff.
Willie Ambys VS.. Precious Ambys,
dismissed by plaintiff.
Willie Jefferson VS.. Lula Jefferson,
dismissed for want OF prosecution.
Lou Mastfn VS.. Isaac Mastin. alias
sumons ordered.
Lucy B. Geddes VS.. r. Kirk ct al,
testimeI y published and Gauss submit
ted for decree on pleading and proof.
Lula Conrad VS. q. M. Conrad. dis
missed for want Of prosecution.
Garrett A. Buchanan We. M. d. Blu
chanan. Dismissed for want of prosecu-
ton.
LULA -. ChtupboTl Vs. d. M. SIMPSON,
dismissed for want of prosecution
F1oreLce e. PEBBLES VS.. Sarah q. Mo-
BILE ct al. defendant. Alex Troy. with
draws demurrer h sretofore filed by him.
Robert L. Peddy VS.. Hattie Peddy,
alias summons ordered.
John Mcdaniel vs.. Emma Mcdaniel.
dismissed or want OF prosecution.
Mary Brooks VS.. James Brooks, tes-
timony published and cause submitted
for decree or pleading ana proof Il
Ed Thomas VS.. Bette Thomas, decree
pro confesso on personal service.
A. M. Sanders VS.. Flora e. Sanders,
dismissed for want of prosecution.
Jeanette Jackson vs.. Andrew c. Jack
son, registers report Of reference read
and ordered to lie over.
Lizzie Parker vs. Sam Parker. decree
pro coneesso on personal service,
Robert Walker VS. Emma Walker, de-
cree pro confesso on personal service
Ernest Hooten VS.. Matte Hooten, de-
cree pro confesso ON personal service.
Roscoe Mccall VS.. Mary Mccall. de-
cree appointing Julius Sternfeld guar
dian ad litom for the defendant, a
minor under Is years old. Complain
ant has leave to amend bill as shown
by amendment on fllc.
William Crawford VS.. J. w. Aber-
crombic, submitted for decree on mo-
tion to dismiss for want Of equity and
on demurrer to bill.
c. A. Newman VS.. Lucy Newman. or
der OF publication to bring in defend
ant, whose residence Is unknown.
Dan Hill VS.. Mary Hill, testimony
publish ed and cause submitted for de-
cree on pleading and proof.
Mary Jane Smith VS.. Joe Smith, order
OF publication as to defendant, whose
residence is unknown.
The equity court will continue in
session today