The silver messenger. (Challis, Idaho) 1890-1912, 1905-08-08

provements on lot 6 block b,
| $500.
That the property assessed t.
Ambrose Caro- and descIibed o.
lot IL block 8 be $50; that tn,
valuation of improvements b.
fixed at $75.
That the property assessed Il
j. F. Hendricks described as 10
l block IA be $50; that the valua
ton on improvements be on salt
lot be $3.50.
That the property assessed t.
John Strunk described as lot 1;
and IA of block 8 be $50 each
that the improvements theron bC
fixed at $3.50.
That the property assessed t.
Geo. l.. Morgan described as lor
q block 8 be $50; lots / and 9 in
block 5 be SO each; and lots LIZ,
IL and IL block z, Riverside Ad
dition, be s. each; that the i'm.
provements on lot l in block 5 be
S275, and the improvements on
lot 2 block 5 be $3.50.
That the property assessed to
Jack Heidi described as lot 8 in
block Is and lot 3 in block 90 be
10 dollars each; that the valua-
ton on improvements on lot 8 in
block Is be $50 dollars.
That the property assessed to
j. d. Woods described as lots 23
and "a block be so dollars each;
lots and 8 block 8 be 10 dollars
each; lot IL block 10 be 10 dol
lars; that lot II block ~ be 10
dollars; that lots z and 8 block 9
of Riverside Addition be 5 dol
lars each; that the improvements
on lot z block 3 be $50 dollars.
At this time appeared M. A.
Brown, attorney for r. o. Rus
sell. in his application to have
the assessed valuation on lot 8
block 6 reduced, and the valua-
ton of said lot was fixed at so
dollars.
In the matter of the assessment
of M. A. Brown for 1905.
At this time appears said M.
A. Bown in his application for a
reduction in valuation of proper
ty described as lot 6 block Is of
Mackay. 1t was ordered that
said valuation be so dollars.
At this time appeared Frank
II. Olsen for reduction of his
assessed property valuation at
Mackay. 1t was ordered that lot
l block IL be so dollars; that lot
II block l be 10 dollars.
AT this time appears j. H. Oh
sen by his attorney Frank Olsen,
ard asks for reduction of the
assessed valuation of his Mackay
property. 1t was ordered that !
of lot 8 block l be 5 dollars and
improvements on said lot be rs
dollars.
In the matter Of the assess.
ment of the Mackay Develop
ment Co.
AT this time appeared N. H.
Clark, agent, and asks for re-
duction of assessment charged to
said corporation. 1t was order
ed as follows: System of water
works 1000 dollars; lots in River
side Addition, 5 dollars each; lots
in resident part of town 10 dol
lars each; lots on Main street SO
dollars each.
At this time appeared N. H.
Clark for himself relative to his
assessment in Mackay. 1t was
ordered that lots z, 9, 10, II, IL
Of block IA and lots IL and IL of
block % of Mackay be assessed
for 100 as prayed for.
AT this time appeared Frank
Uhren for Frank Sweeney, and
asked for reduction of assess
ment in Mackay. 1t was order
ed that the valuation of said lots
20 and 6-be 10 dollars each; the
improvements on said lots be
liked at 400 dollars.
At this time appears Frank
Jehren for John Shaner relative
10 assessment of Mackay proper
". 1t was ordered that lots 8,9,
10. IL, IL, block 9 be 10 dollars
Zach; that lot z block IL be so!
dollars.
At this time appeared Frank
Jehren for H. E. Gilbert relative
% assessed property at Mackay. |
e was ordered that lot 5 block |
3 and lot 2 block 5 be so dollars
Zach; that the improvements on
said lot 5 block 10 be fixed ut
100 dollars.
At this time appeared Frank |
Jehren for Burnett Bros. relative
% assessment in Mackay. 1t was
ordered that lot 6 block z be 1OI
dollars; J of lot IL block be 25 |
dollars; of lot 8 block 2 be %