The times dispatch. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1903-1914, 1905-12-28
ALL
DRUGGISTS.

DRUGGISTS.
say. whether or not this testimony is
cumulative" IN rs nature. and that any
laSman or lawyer shall say whether or
Ing Of lhc case.
In the action OF the faculty refusing
to reopen the case, It said It did not
grant the truth OF many OF the allega-
the 10Th" On seeing this, wrote at
once to the president. stating that Twas
not conscious OF any nisstatetneflt in
that letter, but IL there was,ahefGre going
further. earnestly and respectfully asked
that such alleged 1nisstatenelts3 be poi- Z
ed out. This, LIKE. EVERY OTHER
.F IsistetL M Aon RErusB JED - inA
On the first page of the anonymous
pamphlet, not signed or apparently en-
dorsed by any one, 1t Is said there are
faculty was reluctant to enter upon
their detailed examination at this time,
and earncst in the hope that the neces..
] have no doubt the faculty Is ..reluc-
tant' to discuss the statements OF that
letter., but surely this reluctance Is not
engendercd by considerations Of tender
again call on the laculty to point out
these alleged ''inaccuratc' statements, 10
come out III the open" and let the public
huc" HLul ID ny lHHSp cONeIIl anu
mysterious references, On the Sunday
evening was IN Biacksburg, and short
~ after the brother OF the assistant
marshal had reported to me the fact of
atOr Daniel, which he said his office had
been notified Of IRON Lynchburg nearly
nine hours before. he informed me OF It
and only then when too late 70 send
another message that night, the chief
marshal or detective OF this Institution
called at the hotel and asked an inter
He said he had come to advise me- as Il
friend CD. not, to be 30 vigorous IN my
attempts to rescue my son. as I then
seemed 70 be. because, he said. there WAS
l ought to know and which If / did know
would change my views and the course
was then pursuing. told him l want
ed ALL THE LIGHT could get on the
case.
then asked him. ''If HE knew any
thing" He replied. He did not" l then
asked him. II he knew any one who
Of d NV % Fffss s knes Asked ta9 b names
give me those Names" Hc replied, ..Hc
could NOT DO THIS. WITHOUT THE
CONSENT OF DIR. AfcBRYDE.n. / then
asked him. What he meant BY this?''
piled, He could give me the name OF
only ONE of these witnesses without DR..
McBryd's consent" 1 asked him to give
me that ONE. Hc declined to do so that
l.
MORNING Although I remained in
Blacksburg all OF the next day and part
Of the day following, that man never
came near me again. He told me in the
been caught with MY SONS GUN, vio-
latinE the law. shooting hats, that (Sun-
dayo evening, and that consequently my
son was IN another rNhlcuIty j soon
a GUN at Biacksburg. and that there
was not the slightest Foundation for this
statement. Who sent this man to me?
He said no one did. Then why did he
he tell us, why his assistant also an
official Of that institutions, thwarted me
IN my efforts to send that telegram to
Senator Daniel? and by whose direction,
I would like very much to find out.
IN his letter Of October Cd, the presi-
dent stated he world there give me IL
more full and formal statement of "ALL
the either three students alleged to have
been engaged in this hazing: and yet. in
tths letter the president does not refer 10
the two Witnesses" the names Of which
his marshal, or detective said he Ghe
marshall knew OF, but could not give IRE
their names even W1THOIJT THE CON
SENT OF THE PRESIDENT.
* ! am content to leave 1t to Virsinans
to say, whether this is the fair and open
course OF conduct pursued by those who
In this same anonymous" paper a
further attempt is made 10 prejudice my
sons case, and injure his character, by
rccitals OF how he remained In his room
at the college. after lie had been directed
to Leave it. The truth about this is, and
the writer Of that pmphlet. either could,
or should have known It. my son only
InXfa b b Rs goc HE P PAR Se TIE F
THE PROCEEDINGS. FOR iA-REOPEN-
ING OF THESE CASES; AND HI; did
THIS BY MY DIRECTIONS AND WI'iE
THE ADVICE OF SENATOR DANIEL
self never dreamed that the faculty.
would refuse to reopen these cases, after
we had laid the evidence before IT, as we
did, and we thought then II WoULD
THIS. have already explained the
cause OF the unexpected DELAY. But 1t is
not pretended my con misbehaved OF
did Amy damage by remaining IN his
Gas in the case of every other bill sent
TO me from this school, I have asked 20
deductions for anything), ! am ready TO
pay any charges for his stay'ng i'll that
only did IN OBEDIENCE TO MY d.
RTCT1NNs. AND AGAINST HIS OWN
PROTEST.
Refusal Of the Faculty and Rector
to Let the Record Be Seen or
Furnished On Appeal
AS soon as the faculty refused the
pealed TO the Board Of Visitors on hshalf
of my son, as we'll ns on behalf OF
Messrs Fuhpnk and Sallca, at the re-
Quest OF their respective parents / then
again requested OF the rector, MS I had
Of re fasYty t. be fr T1 sr q my
q t@shs e ALso R1sF6shD no aRAST,
TAKING THE-TO MY MIND--RE-
MARKETABLE POSI'lION THAI MY RE
QUEST FOR THE RECORD WAS a
PART or MY API,EA1 IN TUE CASN
AND COULD ONLY BE GRASTED BY
THE DIRECTION OF THE BOARD OF
IL was thus put lin the. position of ,ap:
which was IN the possession OF tho
and and / was refused permlssion 20 sec
tho record on which that Judgment was
BAR OH THE ArPisL LATE iTIsiBuNAL.
no ARGUE MY CASE. HOW DOES
THIS SOUND TO EITHER LAWYER
OR -IAYMAN? AND TIE sO-CALI4llD
OF TTiE FACULTY 40
MY I,EiTTER, ALTHOUGH II HAD
-Y,ry IoT r d.