Perth Amboy evening news., 1905-03-09

letters of protest had been flied WITH
the City Clerk
Perth Amboy, N. J Mar 4. 1905.
To the Mayor and Honorable Board Of
Aldermen:
Gentlemen II would most respect
fully protest against the Washington
street brick pavement OH account OF
the eXn'b'tant snm charged up against
my property, which is located at the
corner of Washington and State
streets. This being q corner lot. 1
CLAIM l do not derive the benefit re-
lative to said assessment and hope
ynnr honorable body will take the
matter mp for consideration.
am yours
Very respectfully,
Michael Draper.
To the Board Of Aldermen of the Cjty
of Perth Amboy:
Gentlemen II, Thomas Kelly. of
Perth Amboy, dn hereby demonstrate
against and object to the assessment
aRsinet my property for th3 Washing
ton street brick pavement. am tie
owner of land on the southwest corner
of High and Washington streets. own.
ing thiTty-six feet on High street and
one hundred feet on Washington
street. The final report shows an as.
sessment on said lot of two hun red
and eighty three dollars and forty. 1--WE
cents L respectfully protest against
said assessment, as it Is toe high and
more than said property should bear
in proportion of benefits received from
said Improvement.
This remembrance Is made and filed
| with tl Jerk Of said city in compli-
ance with thu provisions of the city
| charter and the notice given by said
city clerk under date of February II.
1906
Dated February II, 1905.
Thomas Kelly.
To the Honorable Board of Aldermen
of tie City of Perth Amboy, N. j.
Your petitioner, Jacnb COLDER ger
by his attorney, Leo GoldberGer, res
pee fully shows unto your honorable
body that no is the owner OF property
facing on Washington street in tho
city OF Perth Amboy, that said prop.
erty is known on the assessment maps
lot No. 20 in block 81, and lot &c in
| block 80
Your petitioner farther shows that
said lot 25 Is twenty. five feet In
width, and that lot &c is seventy five
feet in width, q total of one hundred
feet.
Your petitioner further shows that
by reason of the paving of Washing
ton street, lot No. 90 has been assessed
for said improvements $2l8, Which
with lot 25 assessed 500 amounts TO
1897 for the one hundred feet.
Your petitioners further show that
for the same amount of frontage on
same street, lot No. l in block 20l,
is assessed kfor 1906. 20, about s22 less
than your petitioner. That lot No. 20
IN Mock 81 also lot 20 in block 30 are
each assessed at 1888 40, about $40 less
than your petitioner; that Hot No. 1C
In block 224, aud Tor No 10 in block
98 are each assessed 1868. 40, about So
less than your petitioner.
Your petitioner further shows tina,
no allowance was made for seventy
five about feet ourbstone, said street
having been ourbed a few years ago al
your petitioners e%xoense, and said
curhstQpeo was not replaced by the
G. contractor.
In view of the foregoing your petit
tioher firays for not only q reduction
10 the assessment but also al allow
anqs for the curbing.
5llf 'sss Leo Goldberger,
Attorney for Petitioner.
Dated Per;h Amboy, N. J. March 1
1905,
.4 Mar. 6, 1905.
To Board Of Aldermen:
Dear Sirs:-I find in examining the
man and Anal assessment Tor the
Washington siraet pavement, that lot
No Is, block 80, has been assessed foI
thirty-srxI feet, whereas the said lot
has n frontage of only tbirty-four feet.
Hoping that the same is corrected,
remain a....
Mrs. Rosana Killmurry.
Perth Ambov, N. j., Mar. 6, 1915.
To the BoorA of Aldermen, city OF
Per h Ambny, n. j.:
Gentlemen most respectfully
rrotett against the brick pavement as.
lsessment on Washington street on &c.
lcount OF it being exorbitant.
The anove property is located on tho
Iporthtr lv side OF said Washington
stree, between STATE and Mechanic
streets.
Kindly give this your attention.
Est. Richard O'Toole,
ptr Mary O'Toole.
Perth Amboy, N. j. Mar. 6, 1906.
Hon. Board of Aid, rmen:
Gentlemen:-I would most respect
fully protest against tho Trick pave
nent assessment OF Washington street.
Being the owner of prop rty at the
CT rner of State and Washington streets
and assessed for same in full for Wash.
ington street., when part 10 on Stat,
street of which | drive no benefit
from said assessment l would also call
your attention to the number of feet
of which l am assessed namely. RON
ming 225 feet and i Am assessed for $50
feet, Witch is an error. Kindly give
this your consideration.
l am yours
Very respectfully
Julia Timmins.
These communications we're referred
to the committee of the whole. The
chairman then asked if anyone present
had any objection to offer against this
:, nc ., !. M N,,n N,arar 11:aa..1