The Worthington advance., 1905-12-29

| last year the repeal or the assign.
ment clause. This provision has
been made the convenient vehicle for
evading the spirit of the law and for
large holdings. The law limits the
I.amount which one person or associa.
ton of persons may hold, by assign
ment or otherwise, prior to patent to
320 acres Of such arid or desert
lands. The most common form of at
tempted evasion Of this requirement
Is for two or three individuals to
| form themselves into a corporation,
each individual member Of the corpo-
ration securing, by entry or assign
ment, $50 acres of such lands and
the corporation as such 800 acres.
These same individuals then form an
other corporation under an entirely
different name and procure an as
signment Of another 800 acres, and
this process is continued indefinitely.
The General Land Office has within
the past year endeavored to put q
corporation or association Of per-
sons is not qualified to receive des-
ert-land entry by assignment where
it's individual members ,either singly
or In the aggregate are holding $40
acres Of such arid or desert lands.
This ruling, If enforced, will tend to
lessen the evils resulting from large
holdings prior to patent, but it IS not
deemed possible to secure adequate
control Of this question unless the
law prohibits assignments Of desert
land entries. By repeating that pro-
vision Of the law and requiring the
claimant to show that he has made
the entry for his own use and benefit
and not for the benefit Of any other
person or corporation and that he
has made no agreement by which the
title shall inure to any other person
or corporation the evils Incident to
large holdings Of such lands under
the sanction Of law will be materially
lessened.
It is a striking fact that these large
holdings Of desert land are not re.
use. Three hundred and twenty acres
of irrigable land is entirely too much |
for economical handling by one per-
son. On the other hand, inspection
shows that in the same locality and
under the same climatic conditions the |
homestead entries, where not COM
muted, are reclaimed and utilized.
The desert-land act ~ it stands up
on the statute books appears to have
many features which commend IT,
as before stated, the practices gov
erning it have largely nullified it's
good features, and the resulting
evils cannot be fully overcome with
out Legislation.
The area of the desert entry
should be cut down from 320 acres to
not exceeding 100 acres, and discre-
ton should be given to the Secretary
Of the Interior to cut it down still
further where it is apparent that IN
tensive cultivation is practicable: A
farm Of 82O acres, If irrigated, Is en-
tirely too large for single family,
and its possession simply prevents
other settlers from coming into the
Furthermore, it makes land
easy and induces specula-
ton. -.
Actual living at home on the land
Tor not less than tive years should
be required before patent. You3
Commission can not understand why
any settler should be given both
homestead and desert entry, either
If which without the other should suf-
ice, under the law, to furnish him
home. The desert-land law should
be a means Of settlement, and nctral
bona fide residence should be rigidly
required.
Tnc actual production Of valuable
crop should IL required on not less
than one-fourth the area of the en-
try. At present, as a rule, the great
er part of the desert entries are
never actually watered. Hundreds
Of desert entries were examined by
members. of the Commission in the
last year. and the great majority OF
them were found to be uninhabited,
unirrigated, unculivated, and with
no improvements other than q fence.
This applies both to desert entries up
on which a final proof is now being
offered and to other entries to which
title has been given.
1t is a fact that q very small pro-
portion Of the land disposed Of under
the terms Of the law has actually
been reclaimed and irrigated, and
scrutiny Of many hundreds Of desert
|