Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1905-05-16
After Much Discussion Document
is Referred to That Official
For q Report
HOLIDAY OFFERS IASINUATIOAS.
Wotefmslu MIDDLE 10 be Strengthened
0ut-.JudCe Brswn Placed N
The Payroll

'hh Light ana RnllWay company NJ
extension ana consolidation OF It's pres
ont franchises was submitted TO IN,
city council last night by Councilman
Tornstrom, who said that the ordlnanc,
had not been taken out Of the hands Of
tho committees ana was not propor,
boforo tho council until report had
been made on A. but no wanted II read
No that all the members would have M
opportunity Of hearing II, II was nc.
cordInply read ana then there was con,
siderable discussion M TO what should
he done with II,
Black moved that II be referred "a the
city attorney for mn opinion an 10 IN
legality Fcrnstrom objected 10 such
procedure and asked that the ordnance
b. laid oyer Tor one week, Holiday
GOULD not see any reason why II should
not be referred to the city attorney,
llo said n should olthor go 10 the ntlor.
pcy or DO thrown IN tho waste haskell,
llo was of The opinion that the support
ore NJ the franchise were afraid TO allow
Il 10 60 10 tho attorney,
INSlNuATION RESENTED.
Wells said IN reply that there was
nothing 10 conceal, that the city at.
iornoy VIM have access 10 the franchise,
Ito has already made suggestions IN ~.
glrd 90 II, he said some ~ which have
been accepted by the committees ana
others rejected, Ito urged that no delay
he had In the matter 10y referring but
that II be laid over until next Monday
night and then finally disposed or
Martin raised the point that the
franchise was not accompanied by n
deposit Of $500 M required by law, and
hence II was not properly before the
council That point was covered, how
ever by a section IN tho franchise
which provides that the collection OF
,ho 5000 shall be waived by the city
hence That point was not pressed, After
further discussion NJ 10 whether or not
,ho ordinance was before tho council
llaHcnslcln, who was IN tho chair nt
tho request Of President Hewlett who
participated In the arguments, ruled
That tho ordinance was before tho
council
ORDINANCE REFERRED
NNAf NNN 'H'll lNhNll WI nlNtK "
motion TO refer 10 the city attorney
Black Dean, llartcnstoin HOLIDAY,
Martin, Neuhnuscn and Wood voted
IN the Affirmative and Barnes, Fern
strom prococ, Tuddonham, Wells and
Hewlett voted IN the negative Tho
attorney was requested TO report on II
next Monday night,
TENT or THE FRANCHISE.
The fun text of the franchise M
agreed upon by n majority OF the COM
mlllces on municipal laws and special
water supply follows
An ordinance ptlfylng ana confirms
lng the transfer of franchise 10 Utah
Llght ana Railway company n cor-
pomtlon, extending the life Of said
franchises and amending the same, IN.
Guiding the franchise Of the Utah Pow
or company
Ne I, ordained by the city Council Of
salt Lake city, Utah,
section !, That all tho franchises Of
ut0h Light and Railway company, u
corporation organized and existing un.
ger the laws Of Utah, said franchises
J. a franchise Of Aug, 30, 1859, to the
Nht Lake city Gas companyi also u
franchise granted TO Salt Lake Power,
lLlRht ana Heating company, Jan, II,
i"li also Q franchise TO the Salt Lake
q :, Ogden Gas and Electric Light CON-
phny und0r d0to OF May 30, 1893,
~ IT, a franchise granted by Salt Lake
Vly TO Robert NJ, Jones, July 90, 1893.
II A franchise granted BY Salt
Lake city To n u, Walker Dec, No. 1893,
w a franchise granted by salt Lake
Clly 10 Pioneer Electric Power com.
pony May a. 1907
~ a franchise granted by Salt Lake
CIV TO- salt Lake city Railroad com.
pnnY Jan, 70, 1882
,Nh a franchise granted by Salt Lake
'll} Ia. salt Lake CITY Railroad cons
pgnN Feb, H. 1890,
VII A franchise granted by HALT
LAKE city 10 Salt Lake city Railroad
company May 90 1890
VII A franchise granted By Snlt
Lake city to Salt Lake city Railroad
company May b, 1901
alN, A franchise granted by Salt Lake
IVY 10 sal, Lake city l,nllwOd cons
plny Sept \, 1891
~, a franchise granted by Salt Lake
cry TO Salt Lake Clty Railroad COM
pnnY Nov, ~ 1901
~ y lINnVnlhp NinnlNU ny SAT-
ih,aoke CITY to l., H. Hamilton Jan, 20,
, III, A franchise granted by Salt
LAKE city TO Salt Lake city Railroad
company, May b, 1903,
, Nlll, A franchise granted by Salt
LAKE city TO Salt Lake city Railroad
company, April ~, 1893,
, NV a franchise granted by S0lt
lake city 10 Salt Lake city Railroad
company, May 90 1892
, Nv a franchise granted By Salt
hnke Clly TO Salt Lake CITY Railroad
Company oct n 1900,
, NVL a franchise granted by Salt
Lake CITY to Salt Lako CITY R9Ilrond
'om!qny, March 81, 1901,
, Nlll a franchise granted by Salt
nna'ke city TO Salt Lake city Rapid
nQslt company, Feb. II, 1890,
, NNlll, A franchise granted by Salt
l'ke city TO Salt Lake Rapid Transit
'"ubeny, April 20, 1890.
, Nm, \ franchise granted by Salt
LAko city 10 Salt Lake Rand frnnaii
company, May 0, 1900,
M a franchise granted by Snlt
lNNo CITY TO Salt Lake RAPID Trnnelt
company April ~, 1894, which latter
H9nohlho also confirms tranpfor Ia
nga Sell Lake Rapid Transit company
M franchise granted 10 ponperton
illoe ana Fort Douglas Rapid TranpIt
,onpohy' and q franchise TO G, TO-