The times dispatch. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1903-1914, 1905-01-27
SUPREME. !. 0 | | !.
SEALS M'CUl|EE. 5
DOOM. F0R# EVER ]. (. '|.
\ ,c.ontlnuod from Seventh Pase,] ~

the mode Of proceed1lIl,c,, u, -
WHO stands by wi thout
rope cyidesin,ee ex n,'not objccting, will
Nj. M 1,cnrl 10 mako tho objection after
5Verdlet And 80 with i N rue ,onr,tted
words, i ~ ionss Nth Mif the Court
sS.pp Il sllrrt when IS their dutyat,o
SfspeaAs they arc mot pcrini tted 70 speak ~
th ,,n, apty ,dsns IA rdi Is
S Il hanithoso cited, Tho court. n
the piesence of tho prisoner ai,u q an, ny
collnsel at the instance OF 9urS, ,,cra
,nda r snSl Which n S II prescribed does
,,ntHa ,3,,tni. that tho limits imposed Ry the
court exceeded. or that the 11,,
was preiudlced by what od " rrht TO-
tsit mute prepared 70 abide blythe he'll, les' i,bs
II IL they we're favorable. OF TO ilnKe o "
1ectiofl, were az aaxetse IA cr rac
Ice to exclude newspa pers from ING l. ,n
,rney are called upotl8to exercise lle NH ~,
cred duty which cal, devolve supon 9 ,5 en-.
s zen. and in It's discharge they must lnute
q ssiteh personal .sncrhce as is 4, g
l did rfornancc but under the ar 81
cunst a1,ces 81 this sIa q rcsnect
er1oris disso ,esd 4b1 ~ stltinns for writ
ser, pne NJ case So Without being salts
fed that the accused had every advantge
aecr,.e to nm Iron II ullt NJ r9 ma
81 q "a thc fnnts presented in evidence
eyyjtholit9being convinced that no adv ocn cS,
make the worse anpsift
5abou tSany other result than that wlI,ch
Fl as6been. reached. The evil encc precludes
s every rna sonablc hynotl1cs q, innocel1c;
M anfl8points ithsl,nerrng certain 10 me
Euiitvst1ian. 'rhc record dscloscs M homi-s
eide remarkable only for Its atro,citS Il,
I'D the fact !, 81,
,;,,i, /, al henn on triis; ed S,y his feuW-cfti-
isswftii5 d responsible office and that.
5R8 theipictim was his wife +, 8, B
"a have gone through i he record atld
5lise,ssed what seemed q q Us t. be tt Y
more inlportant features. here are SIX
ptlons to we have
Some Of hem we deemed ,ni \, PC
established. or covered by Wlat9we .h "a "
said with ref erence to kindred exceptions
38 and there@is but8one other vic W W cl We
q n ra1 He'd #upor ITO present. Sg5sl
.S5353s Subtle Suggestion.
4, hrqash psat9,nus ae mofs
here is a subj lcSsugg estiol1 TINS court
has introduced % prac tice Will tends ,to
Undermine the RICH and .nbrldge tue 1s
OF nose VINO sta1iel accusee =
The theory propounded seems TO hesth!aaI,,
aSBrit of error to the jte grlen iot q ira I
s$victed8 of crime; while the trut il llata
revlcp- by All appella 10 tribunal who - 81 c.f
POM all, ppeal or writ of Gro no par
SS fShdue process OF IN W. II l5{
ssss3' The q nalienable rights O person as,
81 used of crime are3tlus stated In the BIZ
Of lights That, in all capital or or MI
nal ions, man hat a right to
enand Til cause and nature 4, Of his as
SSclsation,2s toSbe Econfron ted with he ac-3
cusers and witnesses, to call for evidence
his favor and to a speedy trial. Tx an ll
whose unanimous consent he cannot he
VI found guilty: nor can he be Scon,pelled 10
~ give evidence against himself; that @no
gSs ma 81 nc deprived of#his llberty except by
e3laWsof theland or the udgnent5of his
S peers. !" y. II iS1 ~ & {sss
NJ controls tho action off, this court. With
gS 10 ference to Z npea IS and Writs. OF error
section says:t"InE III case wherein tho
4 court shall deem the .jld glnent, decree, or
l@ III order. complaine of plainly;,rightE and
reject 81 on tina ground. and the orderGof
Srejertion so sta ties, mo other petl ton there
in shall af forwards be en- tertained.''+ MI
49, We have no such practice as all absolute
fright of appeal Iii; civil or criminal cases
2ss But the law requires a petition, accompa-