The St. Louis Republic., 1905-03-06

cor,cstins ca andidates received se5 votes in
the ward.
Michael J. Walsh had a clear field for
the House of Delegates I'm the Second
.. Ward ard pclled 81 votes The other Of
hces without CONTEXT received practically
the same vote
The Third Ward gave tn Daniel F. Hef-
fernan. the lone candidate fo- the lower
branch OF thc Municipal Assembly. 5Sl
Votes. an averas. for the remainder Of
the candidates without contest. John
Golden ?olied 50 votes as the only canJi-
cidate Tor the House OF Delegates in the
Fourth. This was also the total credited
10 Mayor Wells ard the other lone can
dhatec.
isaac Conrin E.d no opposition in the
Fnth Ward. but lee was credited With onIy
thirty votes This was through \ mis-
take in making the returns. the votes
irofi the First District not being niv.u N,
the recapit.lation sheet for The. ca,dia,,.
Tor the House of Delegates. This WAS
one or The iightcst wards. Mayor Wells
receiving on.y seventy-rine votes the av-
erag" for the remainder of the tickct.
william L. Ii'nmr:manu had a ma lori.
~ Of y. over John p O'I:ri.n i'm ,I,e
Sixth Ward. Zimmermarn's majority was
equally divided i-;wcen the First and
Second Districts. McAiahon also ran ahead
"f Hogan IN this ward. receiving a. votes
TO his opponents 80. Mayor weIls's y,,.
WIS .6D.
The next eight wards were w.rho,,. con-
test IL III. Hous. Of DELEGATES In ,h.
seventh. Peter Schucll received ~ Votes.
William Kaiser in the Eighth al. George
onto IL the Ninth lsaa Henry y. iIo, in
III" Tenth 90. Peter J. ON.nI in the
hiev' nth 80. William EouI In the Twelfth
'i'. Fred Nei'lmer IN the Thirteenth LOST.
aii John H. Williams in the Fourteenth
-.
GAZZoLo'S BIG MAJORITY.
Andrew Gazzols Jr received HI. ,n,-
toritie> over James j. McFadt.., i'm b,tb
districts - the Fifteenth Ward. h,yiu.
% votes To McEiad!en's loo. Phillips. Ha-
german and Hogan also ran ahead OF their
opponents in both districts
The next six nonrun,e.st-d warts -e.,,I,
81 as follows: Sixteenth. Timothy Mo-
honey. .i,: Seventeenth. Josrph y sb.,
"i': Eighteenth. John y. Fletcher. .,l:
Nineteenth. George II. Norp. 3.s: I.w.n-
ticth. John j. O'Br;-n. S.i: Tw.u,y-a,s;.
Daniel i. M--har. ss;
FontaIa curc-,..,I his .t.f-,- ..rv ,p
the DAY in the Tweuty -srcoad Ward. u.
ran behind Frank Huss.y III both Dis
t:Ic's. al;hoU.h h- pole. lis heaviest
set" In the S.coui. In this d!St:ic, D.
received II 20 iiuss..'s III. but IN ,h.
First Received only .. to Huss,y.s .,a
rms gave 'h" nomination 20 HuSs-y by
10; votes. Henry =. Ost-rras. the third
coni' 's'dn'. received 10 votes L.. The S.c-
ond District Barnet and M.Mshou IT,
,"!'-d majoriii-s. but this WAS cI>iiy OF
srt in fl- frs' HasermJn ran ahead or !
Dichmann in both districts.
The Tw-aJy-rh!rd d-v.!opeI tie big
fisH; OF tie day. Ean'I-y h-.l-iax Mo
cirt!:y hy "E!y eight votes. /; iS said |
fEat Mccarthy Will ask I recount before |
the Board ot Election Commissioners |
He received Il majority o: lR vuisS IN the :
Second District. the vote being -. To .I.. !
In was IN TIE First District where B-nti,y !
got his winning margin. but the Mccarthy
seopls wrT. claiming the war.I almost up |
% the time the last ballot was counted.
rhe returns from this district We're: Bent
~ Ga. Mccarthy ~
In TN. Second District. where The real
:u'ler strength dev-loP"d. Dickmann ran
3 votes ahead or Hag-rnan AMI Mc-
NaEOn had the sam. advantage oyer Eo-
IAN. Phillips, however. ran rS ahead or
:urnei- Mayor Wells received ~ yo;.s |
n this district.
The Twenty third Wa-G poiIe,i The hsav-
'st vote. vehicles % all descriptions run
ing steadily from the time the polls !
pened until The close. The returns from
he First District dill 10: reach the Board
Z Election COMMISSIONER Office unit! 20
clock yesterday morning.
William ]. Dillon was without cppssi-
ion for the Hous. Of Delegates I'm tn.
'wsnty-:ouril Ward In the fifs, District
e. Received n!n-ty-iive votes. Th,. returns
rom the Second District were not in the
:oard 81 Election Commissioners Office
ntil after ] o'clock.
James r. Coancll defeated John Dillon
,r the Fuus. Of Delegates in the Twenty
18th Wa.d by tMen;y-seven votes. the I
n;als helm. 80, and ~. Phillips. Ha-er-
Ran and Hogan got larger majoTiries.
layer Weiss vote Was ~:
In the Twcnty-SiNth Ward James j. ,
lash received a.: votes :vr the Huus.. q!
'-leyat.s and Edward J. Smythe got SS
4 th- Tweniy-scventh.
Ralph W. COsIs wU1 ~ the twenty /
ghth. having total Of ai3. to Theodore
Thomas s Stops nni GeorG. ". Hem
rick. the defeated candidates for Cour-
il. ran about e.,sO votes behind III. vic I
,riDuS six Stoops received but forty
.ven votes in the Third warL and Hen
rick was credited with ONLY rwenty-scv-
,. The Fourth warl was also a drag FOR
loops. he receiving Gf:y-Evs VOTES.
H-udri"k also ran behind TIN. other can .
dates here. but he got I.". The Sixth vas
mother adverse ward for StoOpS ans Hem
-ick. Other wards where Stoops and
snIrick ran behind Were: Ninth. Tenth. |
Thirteenth. Sixteenth. Seven
"nth. Eighteenth. Nin"t-.nth. Twenty
81. Twenty-siNth and Tw-niy-sev"rth. ,
Tn" primary vote WAS surprisingly large. ,
'HsiieIing that there were no contests
! for the he:,I ~ the ticket. In all wards
ayor We!la received III. full vote. AMI
lie was also true of tnr other offices ,
here they. ar. no contests ,