World's cresset. [volume] (JAH-ville [Colony], Fowler, Mo.) 1891-19??, 1905-06-22
The pre- Admites
AS View ed
BY y, II, ROBERTS
Saginaw ARK.
Continued from last week,

Then zen, /: ~ Is presented
az proof that your statement Was /
true: Then in Nc. 80 we find
this. Then we say, that il Form
alton IL different work TO that Of
Creation. then he second chapter
has reference to a differend work,
as well as TO IL different time. and
also a Different man, Now Bro y
] am weighing this subjrc, Us you
Advised your readers to d., aud |
must say 10 all candor that if the
above proven as to the man, than
the same is proven as to the cprth /.
and we cOnId then. truly say that
ii Formation Is different work to
TINT Of creation, then Gen lsl. ch,
and 9th TO 18th verse has refer
eucc to n different work; as we'll +
~ to different time, and also Il
diffateut earth; to the one created !
yer l. 2, But no my friend, there /
is no such proof as to either the |
( earth. or the man, and ! trust you
have seen, long before ,bis reaches
the press; the ialacy of using such
as being Gods word when You
know that have already proven
\ IVY plain statements Of Gods word
/ that the first Adams was made
q living soul and was formed of
the dust; while the second man
Adam was "the lord from hoav.
en-; a quickening spirit
| Now the spirit of my statement
was simply this, that il the earth
was the same earth after it was
formed, that it was when created,
(Which you have truly Agreed
then your claim is wrong as to it
proving the two men, one created
and the other ono formed but as
in the case OF the earth, rather
proves TO be the same man after
formed that he was before he was
: formed; that is if he could possible
be. IN the image and likeness OF
, God; and yet be without formy
Now Bro. you censure me for
! many things that am not guilty
Of. and it appears to me that you;
having seen ;hat the bible is all
against you, are DESTROYS OF poison
ing the miDd of the dear readers
, against the truth, us evidenced hy
the plain declarations OF Cod, AT
!, set forth in my arguments past
- You speak OF my views, as my
pet theory which the Pope o.
Rome set up" Etc. You speak o.
), me. as being "traditionized under
o wrong theory Now Bro
g don't throw chunk into the all
q thinking you viii get mo &c
follow You; for shall evel
j continue, ''yours for fair dealing,
Il 10 christian spirit, 'and now Bro
, in that same spirit, will advi>,
you that If you are unable to com
Il bat against the sword, better L
~ surrender; for as it was with Pau
10 so it is with you; 1t is hard fo
d you to strive against the stineinl
10 conviction that you are wronginl
If your Saviour; by your two maj
4 theory. Acts 9;3-.9.
Brother don't you know tba
= most every CHI. in the new Tesla
ie ment. is against your two mar
r theory II you do not know il,
III will almost prove it by the tim,
of you succede in steamieg the de
!. LUCE of Noah's day with your rae,
=" Of people that existed previous Il
to the man that became alive sou
10 Gen 2: I, which You called tn,
!, last Adam in CRrssET Mar. 30jh
: but which God says wrs the frs
o man Adam LIST Cor. IS Is
Id Bro II you will PIT on YOU
- glasses aud examine more closet,
/: my statements OF Previous articles
think yon will find that hav,
y not accused you of saying tina
vs. the Generotiors OF Adam weee:
n created before then iltber; hut
N what | did say was that You, ia
ID telling how many Adams there
ie was, in CREssEr April 6,b said
% there were generations of them
- Adam's) and in The last CgEssEr
for March you said the man of The
End. CD. was the last Adam