World's cresset. [volume] (JAH-ville [Colony], Fowler, Mo.) 1891-19??, 1905-09-28
Pre-Adamites Viewed
BY
REV. L, s. GARRETT,
Continued from last week.

The time has come we believe
that instead Of the Ed, hanging
his head IN shame; Bro, Roberts
ought 10 be very proud, and
happy to know that God has
given US the light Of his holy
word, so that we are able tol
show him his err, inordcr that
he may be able to turn from
darkness To light; and then walk
in the light. We notice that the
Bro. after quoting (Neh. l3-.3-
25) he says now Bro. Garrett
what ii there were no living man
able to tell why this languaged
was used, would that be proof
that there was man previous
Adam?'**~ Suppose | ask you
why God suffered things 70 ap
pear in the Bible that is consid-
cred indescent by people OF this
age. II there were two men! Ii
you are unable to tell why he did
would that prove there were not
two menu Yes we say, ify you can
not tell why it was, that it was
such a curse for the Jews to
mingle and marry in Neh's time
with the Ashdods and the Anon
ties and Mdabites, it goes to
prove there was two men with a
middle wall between them. That
I by the Jews marrying wives OF
them il was such a curse that 1t
brought death on them. Your an \
swer then on this question does
not help you one iota in proving
up your one man theory. No one
has disputed the varsity in the
Image OF the Moabites or the
Amenities, nor neither have | ask
you to give the Image OF the
Ashdodites, but the question we
ask you to give is this; Ii there
were not TWO people please tell
us why il was such curse, SO
much so that it brought death
on the Jews every time they
mingled with the Ashdods q
|any OF their connection You
may have satisfied Bro. Simons
on his question we know not; bu,
| in your answer to him directed
to me you have not touched or
the subject that is up between
us. When you answer the above
question which we have asked
you then you vii reach the
subject in question between Us
And when you give the cause
] of the great CURSE which restet
upon the Jews by mingling witt
. the Ashdods. Then you will hi
q upon the subject between youant
I lI,and yet is true you have sait
1 nothing about the Ashdods Il
\ your arguement, yet you ma,
have thought you did by givin'
the origin Of the Moabites an
Amenities as the inhabitants b
that little City Ashdod yet thi
} in no wise would give any pal
Of the Image Of the Ashdod
for in the question of 9, A
d Simons there we're three charat
X tiers named, "Ashdods, "Moat
ties and the Amenities" Tt
Ashdods the leading factor. S
the readers will plainly see til;
your arguments on that poin
did not help you in the least COZ
III corning your one man the0r.
10 And now brother. we shall lot
latter the portion Of scriptul
y and its connections which "
! have referred lis to in (Gen, /!
!" 3l-3S. And when We al
through we are confident tn
you Bro. will hang your head
shame, to think you know
l little OF the word Of God as
try so hard to make falsehood
truth. The scriptures you ref
us to, are true they give d
origin OF the Moabires, and h
Amenities. And we must say TIL
w when tn. connections record
"a with the circumstance refer
to, are given. il will place SOL
what Of different face
y the arguments than til
which Bro. Roberts inter
~ ed should be, For we re
10 in the Is ch. that Abrahi
5Et 1.r~lk II. - X ,>ln:x. X q MA .x,,.,, II