The Birmingham age-herald., 1905-08-03
RECORDS OF COURTS


 The following suits for damages were filed in the city court yesterday:
 Richard C. Womack vs the Blrming- ham Railway, Light and Power company, The plaintiff calims $15.00O for personal injuries alleged to have been received on June ', 1905. It is averred that as a prox- innate consequence of the negligence of the agents of the defendant. the plaintiffs hand was badly cut and lacerated and that amputation was necessary. c. W. Bailey, administrator of the es- tate of Bernie Norman, vs. the Republic Iron and Steel company The plaintiff asks $2O,000 damages for the death of the intestate alleged to have occurred in tho defendants mine by falling rock. It Is averred that the defendants should have provided safe place for their employees to work, and that as a result of their negligence in not doing so. the said Ben nie Norman was killed.
 Julia Powell vs. the Western Union Tel egraph company. Damages to the amount of $l500 are asked for the alleged non-de- 1 livery of a telegram within reasonable l time It Is said that the telegram was intended to convey intelligence of the death of Kirby Powell, who. 1t Is claim | ed was killed in the explosion in the l Virginia mines on February 20 I Maggie Hines vs. Ella Mason. Plaintiff claims 5000 damages for alleged defama- | tion of character.
 | G. w Patrick, Mrs. F. E. Franklin | Emma Stoneham and Mrs. M A. Baker | have filed suits in the city court against the Southern Railway company. asking $l999 damages in each case. It is alleged that certain property belonging to the palintins was damaged by excavations made by the defendants or their agents
 Smith Rowe vs. w. II. Crellin and the Birmingham Boiler works. The plaintiff sues to recover damages to the amount of 5000 alleged to be due for personal injuries received by his son, Will Rowe. on September 10, 1904. It is alleged that the accident in which young Rowe was injured was caused by the negligence of the defendants or their agents. C. C. Cash vs the Birmingham Trust and Savings company. The plaintiff sues for s5OOo damages for the alleged non acceptance of a bill of exchange.
 The National Chemical company and J. II. Cash and c. c. Cash vs the Bir- mngham Trust and Savings company. The suit is brought on the same grounds as the above mentioned and for the al legged publication of false statements by the defendants.
 In the circuit court yesterday the fol- lowing suits were filed:
 Maggie Hines vs Ella Mason The plaintiff demands s5Ooo for an alleged as- sault and battery with weapon In the hands of the defendant.
 A.w. Dallas. ct al.. vs Susie A. Ross; suit for ejectment.
 A. w. Dallas ct al, vs. Jennie M. Greene suit for ejectment
 N L. Wilson vs. c. T. Oakley; suit for ejectment.
 The docket for the fall term of the circuit court will be ready for dlstribu- tion to the attorneys by August 15. It will be given to the printer within the next few days. The docket for the two divisions of the city court will probably be ready next week.
 In the chancery court. the Mitchell Lumber company instituted proceedings against J. M. Huguley seeking to compel the respondents to carry out contract alleged to have been entered into by them.
 A bill for the partition of certain lands was filed in the same court by Mary R. Tucker against Joseph l.. Tucker 
 The following marriage licenses were issued from the office of the clerk of the probate court yesterday:
 L. P. Strange of Bradford, to Miss Nancy J. Smith
 George Smith of Pratt City. to Miss Vivian Cooke
 William F. Stephens of Birmingham, to Miss Bertha Hendricks.
 J. H. Davis of Birmingham, to Miss Jennie N. Keenan.
 John B. Sides of Carbon Hill, to Miss Ada Bailey.