Rock Island Argus. (Rock Island, Ill.) 1893-1920, 1905-01-13
ARCHITECT SU|NC|
Frederick +. BorgoIte Claims
81, 200 Commission on
High School.
COST EXCEEDS THE ESTIMATE
Board Refuses to Pay Beyond Original
Figures-Day's News of
Court

claimed due as commission from the
board of education on the construction
of the Rock Island high school build
ing. was commenced before a jury in
the circuit court this morning
Payment is resisted by the board of
education on the ground that Mr.. Bor
golte received his 4 per cent commits
sion on his original estimate of the
cost Of the school. and that ne has no
claim on any amount beyond that sum.
The building cost 100000, or $4,000
in excess of what il was estimated il
would.
The $4,000 comes under what in
the parlance of the builder is called
that he should be allowed commission
To the full amount of the boards eX-
penditure in the construction of the
building Mr.. Borgolte is represented
by J. l.. Haas. and Searle & Marshall
appear for the board of education.
ZInrin Given n Verdict.
The jury that heard the suit on a
note of Henry Fluegel against Max
Ziffrin returned verdict for the de-
PENDANT. Mr.. Ziffrin bought a piece of
property from the plaintiff, giving his
notes in the sum of $500. Mr. Ziffrin
represented that after he paid about
$50 10 Mr.. Fluegel the latter accepted
$500 in full settlement Afterward one
Of the notes for 800 showed up and
was presented to Mr. ZifYrin for col
lection.
Orders of COurt-Iaw
II. Fluegel VS.. Ziffrin ct al. Appeal
by defendants. July return their YER
dict into court finding the issues for
the defendant.
40. Borgolte VS.. board of education
Assumpsit. Jury called and empanel-
ing begun. Empanelling of jury COM
pleted. jury sworn. Trial proceeds.
1Ci. Herbert. Administrative VS. d..
r. !. & y. w. railway company. Case
Plaintiffs objections TO petition for re-
moval filed.
172. Smith VS. Jennings. Case. De
PENDANT ruled TO plead by Wednesday
morning next.
1917. Kershaw VS.. c.. b. & Q. railway
Case. Demurrer to- narr sustained.
Leave given plaintiff to file amended
narr '%
20S. Dimock. Gould & Co. VS.. VIII
cox Attachment. Defendant called
and defaulted. Cause heard by the
court: finding for plaintiff in sum of
s49.49 and judgment for plaintiff for
that amount and costs and execution.
227. Crawford VS.. c., NJ. & ST. p rail
way company. Case. Objections to-
petition for removal filed by plaintiff.
Motion md Demurrer Docket.
All cases on the docket. whenever
set. will be taken up in their order:
247. chancery, McBurney VS.. McBur-
ney
SO. law, Steckman VS.. c., r. l. & p
Railway company.
10. chancery. Smith VS.. Warren.
240. chancery. Konkright VS.. Ram
sey.
15S. law. Coryn. administrator, VS..
C.. X. /. & p. Railway company.
237. chancery. Farrell VS.. Farrell.
63. chancery. Gustafson VS.. City of
Moline.
Ga. chancery. Bramberg VS. City of
Moline.
40. chancery. Burrill VS.. Burrill.
223, law. Moline Trust & Savings
bank VS.. Schiller.
22i. law. Moline Trust & Savings
bank VS.. Schiller.
235. law. White VS.. c., r. I. & p.
Railway company.
207. law. Enstrom VS.. Republic Iron
& Steel company.
207. chancery. Miller VS.. Miller.
G71z. law. Sturgis. Cornish & Burn
company VS.. Cornish
1873. law. McCay VS.. DeKeyser.
32. chancery. Moline b. l.. & S. asso- |
citation VS.. Gaylord
!, Trial List for Next Week.
< Nonday-s2. Steckman VS. c.. r..
& p. Railway company. Case. 80,
Blake & Murphy VS.. Sisters OF the Wis |
itatiOn. Assumpsit.
Tuesday-Ss. City of Rock Island VS.. |
Wynes. Appeal by defendant. Z. Nc |
Caffrey VS.. Stone; attachment. Is. |
Morgart VS.. Moody: case. 104. Hos |
ford VS.. West: ejectment.
Wednesday-11O. Lynch VS.. Noel |
roy; case 671z, Sturgis. Cornish & |
Burn company VS.. Cornish; attach |
ment. III. Mas VS. Rentz: assump-
sit. lis. Margrum VS.. Hamm; case.
nun suaS ~ boISoite vs. betn Is i
rael; appeal by defendant. IL, Scnnell |
VS. City of Rock Island: assumpsit. so. |
Mckee vs.. C.. B. * q. Railway COM
pany; case. SO. Meyer VS.. Saunders;
appeal by plaintiff
Friday-93. Townsley VS.. Hessman:
appeal by plaintiff. 103. Elliott Hunt |
Us. c.. r. l. & p. Railway company:
case. los, Gribbon VS.. Silyis; debt
Old River Man Dies