The Washington times., 1905-06-08
LEGAL NOTICES.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE s,Is-
TRICT OF CoLUMBIA-EMMA E.41I!fE.
petitioner, vs. JOHN II. LANE, Respondent
In In Equity, No. . 06e, Docket No 5s.-To the
holding Equity Court: The above-nan ed
petitioner respectfully represents to the Court
as follows: lst That on the 31st day of jan
uary, 1905. this honorable Court ordered and
ad5udged that the respondent in this cause
Ave (s25} dollars raonthly W as sum l,mov M ns
dente zen lite. the first payment. 10 be made on
renent fne eh OF Fe6rgarJy fe1aJ ls2S I'd That
to pay counsel fees in the sum OF twenty I've
(s2o) dollars, which said sums have been pa. d
the alimony OF sc for the months of Mare
and April but respondent has declined and
refused to pay the amount OF SIS which came
due ON May T. and SIS due on June 4 1865
a total OF fifty $4,000 dollars. under the rul-
ing OF this honorable Court, which he fails
ana refuses to pay, and declares he VIII not
pay, as petitioner is advised 18th. The Pc
titioner Is In very great need of said money
same. as ordered by this honorable Court
has put her to great trouble and embarrass-
OF support, and Is Z, destitute circumstances
as set out in the BIZ and affidavits fled in
this cause. 5th. Petitioner further says thai
abundantly able to pay the sum decreed to
be paid by the court. and she AYERS that the
and obey the order of the Court in order thus
that the petitione- may be put TO as much
trouble and subjected TO as much ernbarrass-
ment as possible. 9Th She further repre-
sentS that the respondent obtained an order
of this Court. upon tho motion OF his coun-
sci, limiting the tlse ir which the petitioner
must take her testimony; that one session OF
testimony was lad by the examiner to wit
April Z, 1905, and that the examiner refused
to take further testimony until paid for tho
hrst session; that the said respondent has
thus has prevented the petitioner from com
pltt1ng the testimony on her Side although
the respondent receives from the Z s Gov
ernment g. salary Of one hundred (S100. 0o)
dollars per month, as set out IL the petition
and Is fully able to pay. tn That for and
On account of the refusal Of the respondent
to comply with the order of the Court in
this cause. his counsel. Henry E. Davis
drawn from the cause as well his former
counsel, L. b. Hay, Esq, and the respondent
therefore. is no longer represented in this
the bar of this Court Sth Petitioner further
represents: By the refusal of said re-
past due. and been called for by petitioners ,
solicitor on May BIRD and May 18th. 1905, and
OF Ine order end decree OF this Court, as
your petitioner believes and AYERS 9Th Pc
Toner therefore prays that an order may be
issued and served upon the respondent re-
quiring him to appear and show cause .gEly
ne ne should not De held IN contempt Of The
Court and that ne shall be required to gay
the aiimony ncsy overdue together witis the
ices OF the examiner for past and ar
range for fu;ure services OF the examiner in
this cause at once. and for such other and
aurtner 1.a reher n the premises as is just and
eequita9lei IL EMMA SsIli4.. T. Lane. RoBT- e
OF OF, Columbia. IS: I EMMA E LANE. do SOL
EMMY swear that have heard read the fore
contents thereof. and that the facts therein
stated upon my personal knowledge are true
and that the facts stated upon information
and belief I Believe TO be true EMMA p
LANE Swort and subscribed to before me
aEIDEMAN. Notary Public 3. G. les u, y
TRICT OF COLUMBIA-THOMAS S. EVANS
Complainant. VS.. DAVID PETER EFT Al
DEFENDANTS Equity, No. q, ,2a9.-The object
of this suit Is to perfect the title of COM
plainant to part OF lot nine square number
one aundred-sSd forty-one in the city of
Washington. Di2tl.ct Of Columbia, beginning
1or the same at the southwest corner Of said
lot, and running thence north % feet s
inches to the center of the dividing wall
between two fiane houses on said lot: thence
east no feet inches: thence south % feet
inches. to the south line of said lot; thence
west us feet inches to place Of begin
ming. On motion of the complainant il is
this 23d day of May ordered that the de-
Iendants, David Peter, Thomas Peter Rob-
ert Peter. 1r-. trustees; John Brown, John
INNS clark, - Brown, -- Ives George
Gibbs. Walter Claiming. Samuel Elarn WI
liam Cook. James McHenry Robert. Oliver.
Boyd. and Ramsey McHenry, If they be liv-
ing; and the unknown heirs devisees and
alienees OF such OF them dead. cause
their appearance 70 be entered herein en-
or before the fort eth day exclusive of sun
days and legal holidays. occurring after the
day OK the first publication of this order, II
they be living and that the unknown heirs
devisees, and alieIaees OF such of them who
are dead. cause their appearance to be en-
tered herein on or before the first rule tay
occurring three months after the publication
or this order otherwise this cause VIII be
proceeded with as IN of default: Pro-
Vlded. a copy OF this order by published once
a week for three successive weeks prior 10
said first return day, and twice a month for
three successive months prior TO the said latter
return day tthe last publication TO include
one OF the former publications. in the Wash
ington Law Reporter and The Washington
Times tSeaD WENDELL p STAFFORD
Justice True copy-Test:~ J. r. YOUNG
Clerk By J. W. LATIMER, Assistant CLERK
LESTER & PRICE. Attorneys
my2s. je1, g. % jye, u, ,au2,I7