The Worthington advance. [volume] (Worthington, Minn.) 1874-1908, 1905-01-20
PROCEEDINGS #pS
Of the Board Of Comfy Com
miSSlonors #E
Auditors Onoe, Worthington
MIMI Ian. J 1NtlS \ - Z m

| Auditors On1oe, Worthington
Mlnu., Jau. 3, 1876. 2 y. %
The board OF county commissioner
members present: Haggaru, I'iemen.
Mu p ~, Bryan and Chairman Gu
| Sw%nbSrg. IA (
In the matter Of the pete tion OF (
W Patterson, ct al, for u public ditto
| IN the toWne OF LOrain aud Hersey an
viswers' report thereon, the followin
persons appeared: Is.
r. Mrs H e Lamb, representing Mr.
AurtAia q RAkestraw, objects to. tn
estimates Of benefits On net Of nw& o
section :, town l00, range 80, SIS, q
being too high, and the Same objection
on 1t Of nw2 OF section s, town l01
range 80; same objection on sw3 Of SC
ton S, town 100, range -. D.
q W Pattersou sppsaeed and o6sres
no objection. a.
n Paine offered no objection.
A Firth objects to estimate OF bone
fits on ne3 ,fne} Of sec o,town l02, rang
80 and 81, ne} Of section 8, same town
ON the ground that there are not th,
number OF acres benefited as estimat
cd in the viewers report and the estt
mated benefits are too high. q
August Wilson objects on th.
ground that nj OF set and 81 OF ned anC
ne} OF ne3, oil Ia section s. town lO2
range 80, are not benefited, and nWt
ne3 OF scotch s, town 1o2, range &c., Il
slightly benefited, but not a. much
as estimated and does not care fol
ditch on any OF the land.
g W Patterson appeared, represent.
ing 8 II Stewart, and offered no OBJ.
lection. .e.
Carl loren appeared, representing
Annie loren, owner OF the nw& Of sW&
of section 4, town 1O2, range 80; the
ne Of sw} and set Of sw4 OF section 4,
town 1O2, range 80. claiming that there
will be no benefits to nj OF sw} and
that the estimated benefits on set Of
sw@ OF section S, town l02, range, ,39,
are too high. X
Albin 3. loren, owner OF sw} OF set
and set OF set OF sec. 4, town 1O2, range
80, claimed that his land would not be
benefited.
John II. Wiechman, owner of Re4 of
the mel Of section 9, township lO2,
range 80, did not appear.
Henry Voss, owner Of the ne4 of the
5w4, and se& OF the nw4 and sw4 OF the
aw4 OF section 10, town lO2, range 80,
appeared and Stated that the estima-
ted benefits are too high.
W. L. and John G. Dryer, owners of
The nj Of the sw4 section ~, town lO2,
'ange 49,, appeared and stated that
here are ne benefits aud estimate on
damages is too small.
VIM Dwyer, owner Of nj set sec. 10,
own 1O2, range 80, claims that the es-
innate Of damages is too small. r.
G. st. p. M. & o. Railway Company
lid not appear.
". l.. Dryer appeared for the town
If Lorain and raised no obj-ctioni.to
he ditch exceptas to the $8OU item aud
claimed estimates OF benefits too high.
J. A Town appeared, representing
\. $. Firth, Aug. Wilson, Henry and
;has. Voss, Albin Toreu, W. LsAnd
John c.. Dwyer, and William Dwyer
mi objects to the ditch on the grouutl,
1rst, that the benefits are altogether
90 high and that the damages allo ned
Dwye are too low. n !
Oomne'r. Tienens made motion
to establish ditch No. 3,on the
ground that thu benefits would not be |
IS greet as the total cost Of the ditch |
IS shown by the evidence OF the land
,wneRs.. Seconded by Commissioned
durphy. The following vote was
AIKEN; Murphy yes, Tiemens yes.
3ryan yes, Haggard yes, SwanbeFg|
'es.