Burlington weekly free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1866-1928, 1904-11-03

opposed the bill in the interests OF the
taxpayer.
MI. Campbell OF Rockingham asked IL
the committees vote was unanimously
III favor of the bill.
MIR. Aitkon OF Woodstock replied that il
was.
Mr.. Sncrburne OF PoInfrel had watched
the workings Of the agricultural college
anl believed it was accomplishing great
| things for the farmer boys.
MI billiard Of Cabot favored the ap-
preparation as an Indirect benefit to an
industries.
MIR Eddy Of Stowe favored the bill and
! rehearsed results already achieved by
| the cologs. Regarded the acconmotions
| Tor students entirely inadequate.
Mr. Davis of Glover favored the bin
! az directly in tho farmers interest.
! Mr. ORren of South Burlington know
| Of several graduates from the college who
| were cninently successful, and he favored
| the passge Of tho hill
! NJ, Lewis Of Troy favored this bill as
! he did all measures looking TO the benefit
| Ok thn farmer.
! MI Morse OF Randolph said that hailing
| from, Orange coun,y-tre nome Of the
! agr lc,ltural cole &c idca-ic could but
! speak fnr tho bill He was assured That
all proper steps would be taken 10 guar
uutcc a sits Tor the building thai wcut
| not onihdrrass tho state, OF 16 represent
| tativnS from Orange county. u favored
! this bill Farmers should take tn" course
! that lnsiIrcs and answers the modern need
| OF education.
| Mr. Grou, Of Derby said til" Morr!l
lappronriation was meant 10 includ" IN"
| mechanical arts ard that th' anpropr.d-
| ton named in this bill would be, in :aci,
| for an Industrial school Iio urged against
! 4 narrow consideration If tn" subject
! and in favor of n predetermined indo-
! ncndcnce and spoke earnestly IN favor
Of tho passage Of the bill as bringing
to pass something for which the people
| Of the whole state will be- thankful in
wears to come. AS they arc thankful tor
| the existence of certain other punic IN
! sttutionS.
! Mr.. Smith of Rutland city said that as
! a student Of social questions h MAS CON
! WINGED that the drift of farmers sons to
the town was due 10 the lack nf educd
tional facilities for them He favored the
bill.
! Mr. Bulard Of burlington reiterated
! his statement that education at the agri-
/
Will stnnd on land controlled oy th"
trustees Of the corporation. maiority of
whom are elected by the State
Mr. . Sullivan OF St Adams city hoped
that he would not be understood as
! mpugninE any members veracity lie
said the mistake was the catalogues,
as 10 tuition.
| ON motion of Mr. OBrien Of South
| EurinGton debate was closed
Mr. O'Sullvan Of St. Adams city de-
Handcl tn" yeas and nays. which resul ed
rs follows:
/ Icae-Aean, Aineworth. Aitken, Archi-
! bald, Arthur, Atkins. Bacon. BAILEY of
! Barre town. Ballard, BARRETT. Bcckford
/ Beers, bentley, ElAnchard, Bliss Brow
! stcr Brooks, Bullard, Butterheld. Camp
bell. Garfield, Chase. Cheney, Clark Of
East Montpelier, Clark Of Grafton, Glars
! of Sutton. Conway. Cook Of Greensboro
! Cook OF Orange Corser, Covcll. Crane
, Daley of Hartford. Dana, Darling al Chel-
sea, Daring Of IIardwick. Dart. Davis
| Of Bethel, Davis of Chester Davis OF
! 1Juxbury, Davis OF Glover. Dow. Downcr
| Drolctte, Dwinell. Dyer. Eddy Farman
| Farrar, Fay. Fish, Fisher, Fits Of Brat
| tlchoro. Fits of Wardsboro tlotcht r.
! Ford 81 Gudhall, Ford Of Isle La Mote.
! Forticr. Fuller. C;alusha. Gates Gilpin
| Granted. Granger, Greeley, Grout Han
! Hanson, HapGood, Hatch Hazeltiuc. Hen
| ~. Willard Kinds, Hoffman, Hunt,
! Hutchinson of EnoshurGh, JakwaY JoslYn.
! Kendall Kenyon, Itetcham. I.addo Berk-
! shire, l.add Of .Alburgh, LawtOn, Lee,
| Lewis, LovejoN. EaNsur, Manuel. Marbi,.
Martin of lIincsburgh Martin Of Mont
gurnerv, MaN6eId Nelendy, Miller, Miles,
| Miner, Morse OF peacram. MORSE Of Ran
| dolph Mclean, Mol, NewComh Newton,
! Niciuls. Norton. Nutting, q Bricn OF
| So'u.. EurlinGton, OSgood Park. parady,
| Parsons, rent, Perrin Phelps, PIKE Pierce