New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1904-04-07
ASSAILS J. Il. H0ADLEY.
Lazcyer Says He Took GHise OF a
ScGTCngcT.

In the Supreme Court before Justice Davis yes
tarJav there was a heated argument on the app-i-
cation OF Joseph II. Hoadley 10 Nacate an or"tr
20 produce his books IN supplementary proceedings
I'm the case of CYRUS Field JudsoU, against whom a
Judgment of 5000 was obtained recently by the
stock brokerag, firm Of Franklin & Scott EX-
Judge I,Amoreaux OF Hoadieys counsel. argued II
support Of the application that Hoadley had b'''
examined personally at great length IN the pI''.f
inEs against Judson and that the oEde- 10 produce
the books was intended TO disclose the evidence ioE
tho defence in suits against Hoadley. JudSon ana
Joseph Letter on account of their disastrous pool
10 boom international Power stock IN 1892
Edmund J.. Mooney, OF counsel for Franklin q
Scott declared that tho order was intended to com
mel Hoadley t. disclose property belonging To
hudson which Hoadlev held. In the course OF his
argument Mr.. Mooney attacked Hoadley as fol
lows.
oady snore check f.r ,25 &C. d 5aya1, to I [ae
tioanI Bank by cyrus Field Jud~on. was on Jgdsgns
authorization MS TO stock ara HoanitF "a. 49,
stated he entitled to apply c'e7{taing JuGS6 5@
had authorized this POOL and 5u'c'ed.i III al .',.-
was also satisfied to turn himself into The gus @"
scavcnger. and yet says 10 you mere 800 ~ Nc
Ee has made full and complete stat, G- H.,
affairs why. ha even turned over u.s." aHl3i'n' Us
which there Vas due $1,000 The in'.toH mr. ~
day is merely hollow p-,tcnce ana "a si'iE i Iis
has told the most extraordinary stories a..u' rs
r,tic-.s Signature although the initials or Geor-s
~ iT,,,,rr,-' 10 underneath his writing.
"f5a55iSy scsulilv ~ Ju3sor vithog. money to
nav his rent and went down t1 Wall street ana
took eycrzthiue Jlt-1l ha5. al want is i.ut -
le prevented from finding through ill- Witness
Hoadley. The property az Julsors creditors
George 8 Graham. 81 Philadelphia 81 HoadI'y
counsel. made a warm reply 90 AR Mooney saying
IN part.
II this is n case where Ioadey can 9e Ga.leI "a a
sravcr,gcr il Is "A case where tins man duH-oh
served tho ucuitsutIry. and should De- chulI'i
TO make some r.raTatluu FOR the "I"4t N". -
done % The court refused Z" i'tiiliLt .'.'
production Of Hoadleys books IN me i'iiH,' ~
ceeding and then this supplement, AIRY ,iI' 4.t.-
was taken 80 reach them. Nj i"ahI"2 'io'..'' =,
having received those checks alluded 20. lL''l- ~
nothing I'm dispute about g. and tiS gies'igI,, "a" -
the stocks is merely toying with tribes ne A.
rstrrer1ent as the return OF, or payne l.f gu
stock between Judsco and Hoadiey Wa 20, H.
md reasonable one Juisou was told 10y ii.lNlls.
"You can have this stock 10y IHns thg ma.
rricc for 81 az the time the stock wac tdi.rH "'
II i'm Inc future YOU tender me back me sto.SA 90
can have. yo,- money, and reserve 10 Hyse',, "
right TO hand YOU the stock at any uih1 I'M I'M ~
mand my MONEY his %as lEar@s of stock and
lauze swept away those q 'ep 7la''9 WI '' ~ ~
ever thing THAI Ju1son mao.
NJ Mooney said tho assumption that Such AZ
srr,.r,or. as the oral agreement as 10 tho pir-
rfae. and sale Of stocks between Judson ana
1roadIe,- was absurd. That Judson should huy
eforls IN 10a and when II Went mp 10 M leIlI IL
,qr - FI0a6ev at the market price. was rol'
Justice Davis took the papers ana restfN'i ueS'-