The Guthrie daily leader. [volume] (Guthrie, Okla.) 1893-1996, 1904-01-11

IaDie 10 pNneI purposes as we'll as lOI
an attachment to stirrup straps
William e. Pelton of Oklahoma City.
who assigns one-half to Joseph Bar
nard Of the same place, received a pat.
ent for a corn harvester. In this pat
ent Mr.. Pelton had 16 claims allowed
by the office, which is considerably
more than the average.
James ]. Smith of Enid, received a
patent for an indicator to be attached
to the doors Of bath rooms and the
like. When the room is occupied this
fact is shown by the indicator.
Harmon T. swearingen of Guthrie,
received a patent for guards for
bridge piers. He combines with the
bridge piers series of rotable buff
fers.
James E. Wallace Of Blackwell, has
patented tongue attachment for
binders.
The secretary Of the interior has
rendered decisions in the following
cases involving Oklahoma lands:
In re John NJ. Sweeney, Kingfsher.
Decision OF the commissioner of the
general land office denying the right
Ito contest an allotment to Curley Hair,
Cheyenne Indian, affirmed
J. H. Berry VS.. G. Thompson Law
ton Action of local office and com
missioner rejecting affidavit of con
test affirmed
John II. Sybee VS. John II. Jones,
Lawlon. Commissioners decision dis
missing contest affirmed
Goodwin VS. Martin, Mangum Com
missioner's decision affirmed
/ Ed. J. Haines VS.. Henry H. Dollar,
Mangum. Commissioner affirmed and
entry held for cancellation.
Maude NJ Jones VS.. H. A. Lamar
Ell Reno. Commissioners decision re-
iecting protest Of Jones affirmed.
Decisions were also rendered in the
cases Of Geo w. Best VS. w. L. Fra
zier and in re d c. Wood.
The commissioner of the general
land office has rendered decisions in
the following cases appealed from the
local offices in Oklahoma.
From Lawtca.
McGrew VS.. Mullinix. Local office
reversed. entry to remain intact
Shelton VS.. Fox Local office affirm
ed. entry to remain intact.
Wood VS.. Lange and oxtell. Re
manded for further proceedings.
owen vs.. Stearas. Local office re-
versed, entry held for cancellation.
Noble VS.. Mertle Local Office af-
hrmed contest dismissed.
Cartwright VS.. Jackson. Entry can.
celled.
Flint VS.. Bailey Entry cancelled.
Marsh VS.. Horton. Entry cancelled.
From Ell Reno.
Otey VS.. Smith. Entry cancelled and
case closed
Sutton VS.. Buchanon. Remanded
for further proceedings.
Denton VS. McHenry. Remanded
? for further proceedings.
J Kettle vs.. Ewing. Action of local
office sustained.
: Dunn VS. O'Connor. Contest dis
. missed and case closed.
= Hodges VS.. Davis. Entry cancelled
Peek VS.. Boesley. Entry cancelled
r From Maneum.
r Brown VS. Kimmel Entry CANCEL
ed and case closed
: TTotter vs. Rove. Entry cancelled
, and case closed
spalding VS. Sutton. Case closed.
. Miller vs.. Hoodenpyle RemandeC
5 for further proceedings.
r Wood VS.. Fletner Entry held fol
cancellation.
Tins VS.. Smith. Judgment for de
2 fendant.
McCarty VS.. Bates. Remanded foI
further proceedings.
J. From KInafisher.
II Lambert VS. Thompson. Contes
4 dismissed, case closed.
\ Rowland VS.. Raikes. Contest dis
9 missed.
Gates VS.. Jones. Entry sustained
q Mullyaney vs.. sissel Contest dis
4 missed.
Moore VS. Moore Contest dismiss
' ed, case closed
Martin VS.. Schwartz Entry held 70
n cancellation.
From AlVa.
Lierle VS.. Pimlott Entry to remail
q intact. case closed
From Oklahoma City.
Wood VS. Miller. Entry held 70
n cancellation.