The Aberdeen Democrat. (Aberdeen, South Dakota) 1???-1909, 1904-04-29
HARTMAN VS.. NORTHWEST.
His Attempt to Obtain Control OF North
ern PScife Railroad. His Success
Would Have Caused Disaster.

Would Have Caused Disaster.
The United States Circuit Court at
st. Paul decided adversely to the petit
ton of e. III. Hartman of New York
for a modification of the decree OF the
United States court in the case of
the government against the Northern
Securities Company. The petition of
Mr.. Hartman said one thing while
the, object was another. Stripped of
all legal phrases and verbiage the
object to be attained was the control
of the Northern Pacific railroad. Mr..
Hartman who represents the Rookie.
Teller and the Gould interests con-
troll the Union Pacific and the South
ern Pacific railroads. Acquiring the
Northern Pacific they would control
three of the transatlantic railroads
leaving the Great Northern railroad
alone to fight single handed for the
interests of the Northwest. New
York men are not eXerting them
selves very strenuously to advance
the commercial interests in the
Northwest. A few facts in the casa
succintly stated may be of interest.
In connection with the decision,
which was unanimous in favor of the
Securities company
The court found that the govern
ment was satisfied with the relief it
obtained and expressed itself as fully
satisfied at present time.
The court found that the duty ofdis-
posing of the assets of the Securities
company could be safely left to the
stockholders of the Securities company.
The decree did not command that
the Securities company should return
stock of the railway companies, or re-
call its stock issued therefor to the ex-
clusion of other methods, which, in
view of all circumstances, might APP
pear to be more equitable.
The fact that the directors of the Sc
curities Co., have proposed to its stock
holders a plan of distributing the
stock of the two railway companies
in a manner somewhat different from
that which was tentatively suggested
by the decree but not commanded can
not be regarded as failure to obey the
decree.
The court did not accept Guthrie's
argument that stock Of the railway
companies owned by the Securities
company was in the custody of the
court.
nc pcUlGlOueTS CldlLQ UudU UuGy
should be allowed to intervene to pre-
vent the continuance of the controi
created by the Northern Securities
Co., the court did not agree to. The
government of the United States is the
further proceedings are necessary to
protect the public the government
should take the proceedings.
The rnvarn mapt is coficfad with fho
decree and stands squarely upon it.
Petitioners right to intervene must
depend upon their personal rights.
The immense through business
which now goes over the Northern
Pacific would be diverted to the I'm
ion Pacific and the Northern Pacific
become little more than a carrie,' OF
local freight. AS the total amount
ly the local freight rates the loss OF
Northern Pacific to keep it's local
rates at the highest possible figure.
When a railroad is making money on
through freight it can afford to re-
duce local rates and thereby greatly
facilitate the development Of the
! country.
1 - Al oiSul1CAU C&A NC SuUStdn'
tiated, northwestern manufacturers
wholesalers, and retailers have 8
great deal at stake in the effort Of
the Observation-Disclosures combina
ton to obtain control of this great
system.
All favorable tariffs from the Twir
Cities to the northwest affecting the
business of merchants, jobbers and
l ~, n N y 3 -, ,,o r-~ ~ Il ryp I@o- k.~--1
opposed and fought against by the
Union Pacific and Southern Pacific
::tcccsts4fc :--;,ss. :nS
posing favorable distributing tariffs
to the northwest. Their policy is tc
work everything to the southwest
of no benefit to the northwestern
states, or distributing points in the
northwest.
shippers have been greatly interested
in the Investigation showing a. com.
pariRon of the rates in vogue on the
Northern transcontinental lines an6
the roads controlled by the Hartman
interests.
Tho comparison in nearly every
case shows that the Union and South
ern Pacific rates are so adjusted a:
to give the Eastern jobber and man
ufacturer a great advantage over tn.
middle west producer in disposing 0:
his goods on the Pacific coast. While
the Great Northern and Northern
Pacific rates are arranged to favor
the northwestern jobber and shipper
SO that he can have an equal chanc.
with his eastern competitor.