The Appeal. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn. ;) 1889-19??, 1904-10-01

johnson Again shows His IEno-
800 - rance. #>sr-'
Sec. 27-eo-2s Pedon H., never report reported 1e
port, is new cuttings" which means
alnined and sold. 1897 on an estimate of
$1,000 feet. which was paid for;
Sec. s4e24 Sold in 1922 Pc Pedo M does oe
but reports land burned over and all
t Wag sof asae for in 1865 Only 10 acres
Of ss state lag? in s sod ie ene prior to
No examinatio made since 1892. In
1893 1873, 40 feet was reported and paid
Sec. s6-4s-24. Can find no report from
peden date at c Of Oct. H. 1855. for an es,
innate of 100000 feet. among field notes
page 112, an estimate for 100000 feet, on
this section is recorded. But as no field
report is found from which this record
IN error in description in record book
East half of this section was sold on an
estimate Of 10000 feet at cash sale In
lG Sec se-55-24. Sold in 1893. Dedon does
not report April, 1900. there were old
cuttings" but reports it burnt over As
this is also reported good farming lano
was much timber on it. However. IS. zoe
feet have been reported and paid oi for. -,
Sec 125s24 9edon reports t6at an an
cutting was made on this section, but
that the timber on adjoining land was
cut. This was sold in 1891. There was
doubt cqtt ngdd done r Sa hard
n nSGned M SEu s1 but could find no pr9of
as cutting probably dated back to 1881
johnson Repeats His BAunder'
sss 1$ $6 ars Sold 1, 1881 e1tata
600, which was paid for 1896: Dedon
does not report prior cutting, He says So; vs.,
"cut and burnt ell around o,,+ "n aS,d
Sec. 16-52-o5. This was sold in 1882 1883.
Dedon reports cutting MADE, put uots
not say when surveyor 6ss been bald
Whether there was any amount OF LII
Der left in 1889 or not we have no pI ro07
as no examination was maze n1 9n sold I1 FOR
$3.50, which has been paid. l can Ilil me, nv l.c
report where Dedon reports s hs;;1:,I
of $50. 900 feet, or any shortage :e sn7
600 feet has been reported and paid Tor
Sec 35-54-25. Sold in 1880. estimated al
10000 no cutting. reported un M do f fn1t
and sold for 1925, which has been p SncC
Proba b!v some timber was cut in 1873!
and not reported. but it was outla"eo ~
1895. o,oz ,,n,er "a nd
ing, which he thought came from thls
land. aggregating 304 1910 feet i Eno f Sut
veyor general reported only l2o.ooo leet
that the any more than the surveyor general general
reported was cut. The estimate u an otm
which it was sold In 1881 Was ''''0'
feet.
&c., 16-5s-25. The estimate was i no.
$4,000. This amount was cut by ltasca
Lumber company, who paldd a tres IooS
exacted by Mr.. Dunn Of $1,OOO IN ioo o. ;,
Of which the trespass on this section was
Sec. 1e-se-25. Dedon in his report No NOV
s, 1897, does not say that the secIlom !r %at
section has been cut and burned ned repe 31ch
p pine. The e,'' highest estimate was 10000
feet, and 114,230 feet was repor so3 and
Sec. 6-137-25. --latest permit issued IN IN
this 1892. No examination mas 81 9 9S0 y.
made since In 1892 an estimate OF ~,
600 feet was made and 1890 teet re re.
ported cut, which has been pald ; 1o.
Whether or not the section contaln lee
t ported am unable to state as no -, eX =
1899. I'm, o.+;,,+1
cutting Which could not be traced: since
1895, $s4o:51 has been paid for timber cu1
on Sen se'is 1s Se Sold in 1892 under az
estimate of 10000. This section proD
ably never contained much t1nloer+ ia, a.
cruisers in 1900 did not report anything
cut. -,
Sec. 22-141-25 Some cutting was NJ NJ
1o1;hi made on this section q number u
years ago and not renorted. - dt was: nt;",
ever too old to TRACE little r timbe See Tb
permit referred to by public exam1.e ff =;
cancelled was one out of forty or NJ
/ sections on which permits were canse ter
BY State Auditor Dun" IN 9ep'e''''''
$4,000 Gained for the State.
Sec. 1e-59-o5. Sold in 1892 at S2o5 PEI PEI
cut was made under this permit. Re
in d 1920 I'm under and St late So
per pu thousand OF The estimat ted value %, O.
this section in 1892 was $1,717.5o Tn nc
amount realized from the sale m ma a., t %!
w sic s yas gS'o Sold in 1889 s25
600 feet, of which 221 900 feet have peer
cut ana Pa1d t for Was mo tim
! Der left in 1891, when it was estimated q
| 50,OGO feet, as it was cut the year prior
Sec. 36-46-26. This section was cut fou1
| different times prior to 1893, ana prop
| ably there was no timber when per
n1itted in 1893, as no estimate was given
| The estimate was $4,000 and the cut re
| ported was 2S9,SSO feet, which has beer
paid. :: 1909
13O. 600 feet. Amount cut was 3S7, III
feet. which has been paid for. -,
Sec. S-5O-26. Sold in 1884,, on an estl
| mate of OO,OCO. No cut under this sale
| Sold again in 1900 for $27O, which has
| been paid.
timber was cut from this section prior u
|. 1901. No trace could be found as to wht
cut the timber or when it was cut. az
four different parties held permit on TINS Il:
| section at different times. all prior tt
| 1898 and as far back 1888. IN
Sec. 16-56-26. In April, 1888, draft *
5s8 for 50, 1863. 43 was drawn on S. D. Will
son for timber cut in this seGti ion a an1
| turned over to attorney general for col
| lection. The surveyor general reported
| 65S, 400 feet cut in 1891. The amount hat
| not been drawn for until Auditor Dunr
made a discovery in 1895. 1t was ther
| four years old and too late to make any
| thing out of it; as Wilson was bankrup
at the time and no trace of the logs coule
1o