The Laurens advertiser. (Laurens, S.C.) 1885-1973, 1904-02-24

house and the senate? The true mis-
sion of am investigating committee, as
It's name implies, is to investigate and
bring to light every side and bearing
of Il question, and not to prosecute.
This Is the first time in the annals
of South Carolina where an ~investi-
eating committee only heard and re-
ported one side OF an important mat
ter, or which held secret meetings be-
hind closed doors, from which mem
bers of the press were excluded.
EVEN IHE NlLEST CRIMINAL is
GIVEN a HEARING.
In his message to your body our
chief executive asked you to devise
some law to put an end to the lynching
in our State. Now, what Gov. Hey
ward demanded for the vilest class of
criminals has been denied some of our
nized and honored by their people
the right Of making a defense, and a
fair, impartial hearing. Before this
report Is ended we propose to prove to
the satisfaction of every fair-minded
person in South Carolina that our COM
mission was tried behind closed doors,
only one witness at the time being adj
mitted, and hat is n most unheard
of proceeding, the reporters of our
State papers excluded. (See affidavit
c.. Wood, Jr., Exhibit ID. Not only
this. but apparently to keep the mem
bers of our commission in ignorance of
nat was going on in that meeting
some OF the witness were bound not
to divulge the questions that had been
asked them. (See affidavit OF D. II.
Means, Exhibit E.). To show further
what a one-sided affair this was, the
son of one OF this committee was made
clerk, and the only outsider admitted
the minority member and the prosecu-
tor. (See ~afiidavits of j. &. Garfunkel,
Exhibit F.
Is the life, liberty, property or good
name OF any citizen OF South Carolina
safe when he can be tried by any such
secret. one-sided tribunal of socalled
Justice?
The palladium of liberty in every
country is Il free press, but we find In
the proud old State Of South Carolina
a throttled press when an investiga-
ton was in progress in which every
taxpayer Of the state is personally in
tereStcd.
HUNTING FOR HUNT.
We are convinced, gentlemen, from
such evidence as we are able to secure,
that the sole witness against us was
falsely represented to the people OF
south Carolina, as an expert archi-
tcct' In charge of the work of the
United States government, when his
name does not pDear in the list of
government employees and he is to-
tally unknown to the experts of the
United States government who are
charged with the construction OF it's
buildings; that his name does not ap-
pear In the blu book" which contains
the names of all government employees
wherever located; while the directory
of congress which contains the names
of the attaches of the national capitol,
does not show any such officer us "su-
p|erintendent of constructing"
All We now have to ask OF YOU is that
this protest be spread pom your jour
nails and be given the fullest publicity,
as you have promised, and we further
beg the press of South Carolina. and
of every other State hat has given
publicity to that report, 10 reproduce
our defense.
AN APPEAL TO THE PEOPLE.
Let us say that we have nothing
more to ask of your body. We now
appeal to the highest tribunal known
to n sovereign State-an honorable,
just and fair-minded people.
A PERFECT BUILDING HAS NOT
BEEN ERECTED SINCE THE
DAYS OF SOLOMON.
We assert that VIC have given to
the completion of the capitol the same
"atchful care that we would have done
mad this building been our personal
property. The members of this COM
mission are not architects. and the
legislature was aware of this fact
when they appointed us to this duty.
We do assert, however, that we gave
careful thought and study to the de-
tails and science of the work, and left
no effort unturned to fully %acquaint
ourselves with the minutiae of the
problem presented. We do not y
that anyone ever constructed a build
ing, however humble it might be, but
after completion he discovered that he
might have made desirable changes
ana improvements. 1t is easy to criti-
else the builder after his work is done.
A building erected by human hands Is
never perfect, and this, of course, is true
OF the work on the State house, but we
do assert that II general result was to
the satisfaction of the commission. and
we further believe that it would sat
isty the taxpayers OF the State who
are paying for this work were the
familiar with all the facts surround-
ing the task assigned us and appreci-
ated the difficulties which we encoun-
tered and n problems presented in
the construction OF this building. Since
the completion of our State house
thousands havc visited Columbia and
inspected this work, and expressions as
to the beauty and m~agnifcence of this
side.
The State louise commission alleges
that III there are some defects in the
South Carolina capitol. that the respon-
sibility rests not upon the commission,
but is due to the fact that $1T5, 900 was
-. w NlIS
building i'm conformity with the origi-
nal work on this structure. The State
House commission e~nleavored to COM
pleto the building so that 1t would
present an imposing appearance. IT
did not attempt to do the work accord
Ing to the methods of so years ago,
but took advantage of improvements
III methods of construction. and for
this 1t has no apology to offer.
This duty, gentlemen, was not SO
llcitcd. and there is not n member of
this commission but sacrificed his per-
n interests and affairs i'm the dis
charge of the duty imposed upon him.
IL was not ours to fix the sum neces-
sary to do tho work That was the
province of the Legislature. We did
we were directed to do, complet-
cd the work your predecessors contem-
plated within the appropriation they
made. We did not deem 1t your wish
or desire that we should apply to you
for additional appropriation when We