Graham guardian., 1904-04-01
OWL DOCKET.

S8s Commercial (thie Building company VS.
Spenazuma Gold Mining Milling company OF
Arizona action for debt
Attys H, NJ. Hubbard and Edwards q Mcfarland
for plaintiffs
s52. S. Hirsch & Co, VS. C M Short and W. It.
Johnson, action for debt
Attys J. NJ McCollum for plaintif; W. Il. Dial
for defendant
s65 SCHUYLER s. Moore VS. Spenazuma Gold
Mining & Milling company of Arizona, action for
debt.
Attys II. NJ Hubbard ana towards M'-
ol4 Thomas Hamblin VS. ]. N. Porter and
Eugene Caruthers, appeal from justices court.
Atys: w. X. Dial for plaintiff Lee ~ Stratton
and Edwards & Mcfarland for defendant
9s1 Estevan Villalobos VS. Albert 7. Woolver
ton ct ais action 10 quiet title.
Atys: j. f. Conroy and Edwards Mcfarland
for plaintiff; c. o. Anderson, r. R Monk and Cal
vert for defendants.
9s5 Sarah E. Arnold VS. Napoleon B Arnold
action for divorce
Atys. L. Kearney for plaintiff
GAL William A Gillespie Territory of Ari-
zona, action TO quiet title
Attys: Hereford & Hazard for plaintifj Q. H.
Rawlins and Edwards Mcfarland for defendants
900 Olof Anderson Albert G. Neville, action
Aiys: Moorman & straton for plaintiff,
9G6 Rufus Nephew VS. +. F Everhardy resti-
tuition proceedings
Aitys i Kcamey for plaintiff; b. baine for
defendant
10. Tie Viher Manufacturing company VS.
G,r A. Oin,y ,tdZ c lriua, oc,ion for debt
AiIys: HtIeicjG Hazzaid for plaiu,ifj Edwards
& NcFurlnrd iur defendants.
He William Il Bingham, trustee, ct al, VS.
tiitt,n Hydrauo ccmp"nY, mortgage foreclosure
Atgs J Ega" for palntitf
!fj. Auwr llaiGve. ct NIX. VS. Ii. H. Rea, ct al.
sction @ 81 aside mining deed
3uys; f b. lame Tor plaintiff; Il. Kearncy and
Twtmcy & Twomey for defendants
ee2 q Ii Davidson VS. Christina Davidson,
rc'on Ter divofcc
Franz b. iaiua piuiuiitf.
l00b T u Slutace vs. Andres Gnerrer' mort
gage foreclosure
Atiys: Wicy T. Jones tor plaintiff.
1901 Smitlvc Irrigation Willing Manufac-
turing e. a,par y aud Ccrira Canal company
Or, aop lri-u0,l Canal company, ct al, action to
establish wat,r gilht
Attys: Edwards & McFa,Snd for plaintiff; Herr
ing & Mitchell for Sun Flower canal; 4, S, Bunch
for Union canal W. NJ. Lowell and J. M. McCollum
for Graham canal and Oregon canal; Joseph Fl.
Kibbcy for San Jose irrigatipg company and
Michelena canal; Moorman 4 Stratton for Chacou
ditch.
1905 Waldo Beam VS. ], 7. Hildreth, action for
damages.
Attys: Edwards & Mcfarland for plaintiff Moor
man Stlatton for defendant
1912 w K Dial VS. s. Il. Allen, action for
damages.
Attys; W. K Dial for plaintiff; Edwards Nc
Farland for defendant.
l0l4 The Markeen Copper company A. i.
Kunce, eiectment and damages.
Attys; Hereford Hazard for plaintiff; Clark,
Fall, Hawkins Franklin, f. B Laine, John R.
Hampton and Thos. Davis for defendant
1915, New England Copper company ct al, VS.
A. L. Kunce, injunction,
Auys: Hereford & Hazard for plaintiff; Clark,
FALL Hawkins & Franklin; f. B, Laine, John r.
Hampton and Tbos Davis for defendant
1921. The Markeen Copper company VS. A. l..
Kunce, action to quiet title.
Attys Hereford & Hazard for plaintiff F. B.
Laine and John R. Hampton for defendant.
1922. The Markeen Copper company VS. L. a.
Durham, action TO quiet title.
Attys Hereford Il Hazard for plaintiff; F. B.
Laine and John R. Hampton for defendant
1923. The Markeen Copper company VS. L. A.
Dunham, action to quiet title,
Attys: Hereford Hazard for plaintiff; F. B.
Lane and John Hampton for defendant
1924. The Markeen Copper company VS. j. L.
Await, action to quiet title.
Attys: Hereford Hazard for plaintiff +. b.
Lane and John r, Hampton for defendant
1925. G. d. Brer VS. D. C. Prina, action for
damages.
Attys: VIM NJ Lowell T. S. Bunch and ]. NJ
McCoum for plaintiff Edwards & Mcfarland for
1926. G. D. Brier John Hopes, jr,, action
for damages
Attys: VIM NJ Lowell, t. s. Bunch and j. NJ
McCollum for plaintiff Edwards & Mcfarland for
1927. County of Graham VS. Eugene Caruthers
Ira Harper and Henry H Supervisors of Graham
county, Arizona, and Chas F. Solomon, action to
money,
Attys: G. T. Rawns and H. 4. Hazard for
PLAINTIFF Edwards Mcfarland for defendant,
1881. W. F. HagaD David O'Neil, action
for debt.
Attys: L. Kearney for plaintiff
1888. Charles f. Solomon The Federal Min
ing company, action in replevin,
Attys: Norman Stratton and W. K. Dial for
plaintiff Edwards & Mcfarland and j. NJ. Nc
Coum for defendant
1884. The Detroit Copper Mining company of
Arizona VS. Maxine Ava, ct al, injunction.
Attys Herring Sorin for plaintiff.
1885. W. F, Main Co., corporation, VS. W, +.
ctio ford deht