Ottumwa tri-weekly courier. [volume] (Ottumwa, Iowa) 1903-1916, 1904-08-30

flow of certain ground caused by the
action of city officials. C. d. Fullen,
attorney for plaintiff
w. P. Chisman vs. l.. M. Cundiff.
Suit for Judgment for. $132.65 alleged
to be due for goods sold to the defend
ant. Smithe& Lewis are the attorneys
for the plaintiff.
John s. Cave VS.. Western Union
Telegraph company. Suit for damages
in the sum of $3.50 alleged to be due
for negligence in the delivery of
message. Lowenberg & Coen, attor-
neys for the plaintiff
Chisman & Blair VS.. Chicago, Burl-
ington & Quincy Railroad Co. Suit
for damages to the extent of 81 800 al
legged to be due for delay and injury
to number Of horses and mules trans
ported by the defendant company for
the plaintiff from Denver to South
Omaha. Smith & Lewis attorneys for
the plaintiff.
Chisman G Blair VS.. Wabash Rail
way Company. Suit for $1,000 alleged
to be due as damages sustained by a
shipment Of horses from Ottumwa to
ST. Louis, Mo Smith & Lewis, at
torneys for the plaintiff.
Rachel Clark VS.. Ottumwa Traction
and Light Company. Suit for $4,000
damages alleged to be due for personal
injuries sustained by plaintiff. in a
street car accident July 21, 1904
Jaques & Jaques, attorneys for the
plaintiff.
G. N. Clark VS. Ottumwa Traction and
Light Company. Suit for $1,000 al
legged to be due for the death of one
horse and the injury TO another in
street cur accident July 81, 1904
Jacques & Jaques, attorneys for the
plaintiff.
Lavinia M. 3annistar VS.. Michael
Schwartz. Suit to secure judgment
for $13697 alleged to be due as rent
on farm owned by plaintiff and rent
ed to defendant r. J. Bannister, at
torney for the plaintiff.
George w. Blair vs. Chicago. Burl-
ington & Quincy railway company.
Suit for judgment for $125 alleged to
be due for injury to carload of
horses shipped over the lines Of de-
PENDANT company from Denver, Col. 10
Burlington Seneca Cornell, attorney
for the plaintiff.
Florence Alice Davis VS.. Modern
Woodmen of America. Suit for $4,000
alleged to be due on life insurance
policy held by the late D. NJ Sage.
1 Charles d. Fullen, attorney for the
Iplaintiff.
i M. L. Davis VS.. Judson Curtis. Suit
for $4,000 damages alleged to be due
for personal injuries sustained as the
result of an assault upon the plaintiff
by the defendant. Jaques & Jaques,
OF fhn LOT
i H. M. Doolittle vs. j. w. Edgerly
judgment for $2,941.40 alleged to be
due plaintiff as balance on a store
formerly owned by plaintiff but now
In charge Of the defendants. G. w.
Whitmore. attorney for the plaintiff.
Julius Dressler vs.. Joe G. Bunk.
Suit for judgment for 500 alleged to
be due for work and material in paint
ing house owned by the defendant.
C. d. Fullen, attorney for the plain
tiff.
Adeline Sweeney VS.. Ottumwa Trac
ton and Light Co. Suit for judgment
: for $1,000 alleged to be due for person
al injuries received on August 6, 1904
by being thrown to the pavement by
one Of the defendants cars F. G. Ore.
lup, attorney for plaintiff.
A. G, Steck vs. Public Water Co.
Suit for damages for $3.50 alleged to
be due as injury to property by reason
of the pumping station maintained on
North Court street. Jaques & Jaques
attorneys for the plaintiff.
N. Eastman Co. VS.. w. r. tanning,
Suit for judgm ent for $500 40 alleged
to be due on material and supplies sold
to defendant b. K paugherty, at.
torney for the plaintiff company
A. Stanier VS.. Illinois and Iowa Fuel
Co. Appeal from decision in Justice
o. L. Campbell's court rendering judg
ment against the defendant for sum
alleged to be due for personal services
Jaques & Jaques, attorneys for plain.
tiff
S. P. Hartman VS.. Harvey Buckler
Suit for judgment for $3.50 interests
and costs alleged to be due on contract
for nursery stock delivered to the de
PENDANT. George Heindel, attorney
for the plaintiff.
VIM. Pedricl and son vs. United
States Express Co.. an appeal from
the decision of Justice j. A. Ballard
rendering judgment against the de
PENDANT company for the sum oil
$54.S0 alleged to be due as damages
to one hog transported from Ottum
wa TO Des Moines by the defendant
company. Seneca Cornell, attorney
for the plaintiff.
William Goodshell VS.. N. A. Prentiss
and ]. M. Prentiss Suit for judgment
for 1910 alleged to be due on certain
promissory note. George F. Heindel
attorney for the plaintiff.
l.. NJ. Sharp VS.. George Cline. Suit
for judgment for $40 alleged to be due
on oral contract for loan. Seneca Cor
nell, attorney for the plaintiff.
J. C. Steele VS.. G. M. Houdyshell, ell
al. Suit for judgment for $500 alleged
! to be due as damages on breach of con
tract for sale Of real estate Lowen
berg & Coen, attorneys for the plain
tiff.
Willis Reno vs.. L. r. Garrison ct al
. Suit for judgment for $500 alleged to be
due as damages on contract for pur
: chase of a stallion. Sparks, Jaques &
Jaques, attorneys for the plaintiff.
w. G. Kitterman VS.. F. G. Stevens
NJ Gut for nd or,npt 70. conn ,1Jo-oL