Edgefield advertiser. [volume] (Edgefield, S.C.) 1836-current, 1904-09-28


Fines Snpe ttion and practically ts
1.tnopope home marke&
eSbeonI dHi,I Ind reform Of exist
il<1nS sib1ss Sfnce the last Demo
nistEatio the cost Of living
egonslyyi increased. Th1se having
fhSea afie6mes have suffered keenly;
THOSE living on wages, if There has
been any increase, know that such in.
crease has not kept pace with the ad'
Evaneesinstee teeseest& lstaings including
1 rent ana the d hacessaries OF life. Many
to-day, are@out OF works unable to sc;
I IcGre any wages,a at Fall. q Te alleviate
lthese- in SO rfargas ,is1in oul
1p;o5IWser. shedid Sbe our earnest en-.
| tdsasnfz zs;s5ssGsS i1ss4As3 ss5gfG sS
Judge Parker defines, the egaifferenc'
between the two parties 'onlahes tariff
question. The Republican party ha'
E|favorea. the protection idea, while thu
.pafty has always claimed
that taxation sSf all kinds should b.
purely with a view of raising neces
saFy revenue.
TRUST REMEDIES:
tnrI@poin outsinsAS S=earlie liersrespenst
the remedg, Which in my judgment, car
Sfectnallggbg applied against tSmonop'
o!ies, and the assurance was then glVer
that if existing: laws Including botf
lSfatute and common law, proved mad
fequate, contrary: to my expectations,
favor euch further legislation, within
Unconstitutional Limitations, as, will best
| promote and safeguard the Interests
= whsiSsf Ss t tSsfs IS an any y Common iax !!
lgwhich, can be- applied and enforced by
| the Federal courts Cannot be dieter.
mined by.t 4Presiden ~ or bssa candt-
tdete for the Presidency = 'tH-''1'
EssThe, determination Of this question
I was. Jeff BY the speople elm framing tfe
te the ciary alla i1e, %
I lE5tosf6es Executive. The Supreme sourtei
the United States has recently consid.
Eereds stfiis saussti6h and; ;ssn tRescase o.
Rthes,W Western. .Un Unipus Te elegraph Co.ys
tThs EalEpnbiish Co G:sTo, s6e found
IN sFnC C-Unendmured ;. and ce1gnty-nTsS!
volume of the United States Supreme:
Court. reports, at page 80. it decided
fhat&coninon law principles could be,
arI United States courts in,
cases Involving Interstate Commerce
lsa5aesab EFjted EStatessstatnte
speciaeallys covering the case. SuchslEs!
sMS B. sREelPRO CITY @ !
; In my address TO the @Notifctt1on
Committee,Es Esatd that tariff, rssy; N "isl
demanded blythe best interestssof both
manufacturer and consumer" With
oualtruth~ it -canlb be said. that the bene-i
fits iofzreciprocal trade treaties would.
ensure to BOTH That the consumer
wouid:sebes helpedssis: unguestiona oie.i
That, the manufacturer would receive
great. benefit by extending his markets
abroad hardly needs demonstration.
HIS; productive capacity has outgrown;
the homes market. The very Term;
Home 4Market,s has changed .sins its!
signiic Once, from the smahufac e.;
turefsS Spoint sofss " lew, meant pan.
sion: today the: marvel lo"s sgrowth of
our manufacturing industries has far;
exceeded thee ,eeMsumntiYes capacity OF!
our domestic mark etssSand the term
Home Market implies cohtraction,'
rather than, expansion, If I'VE would run
our mills to their full capacity, thus
giving steady employment TO onr WorhI VOTE !
naenand securing zto;Tnem anass9s
s.assts
increased !! &c @ pIoauSslS sosn. s,ta ~ ous
raanufa etGTerss are depend deats'on SsraN
nnaterfalssin whole aofs rttimpo ported,
IF lis vital 6sthas eXtensi ous 18th cir
abroad ifiat tGthey yssecIFe their
mateftaisson-t tne. laoss IaSo1a g,ssei