The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1904-06-17
RAISES The BAN.
Judge Hazen DissOlVes the In
junction Against Strikers.
No Reason Shown to Keep the
Order in Force.
GET ANOTHER CHANCE
Company VIII Ask for Perma'
nent Injunction.
Whole Question Will Then Be
Taken Up.

this morning dissolved the temporary
injunction in force against the striking
members of the International Associa-
tion of Machinists in Topeka, who were
barred from the Santa Fe shops May 2.
by the officers of the company, when it
was learned that a strike was ordered.
Judge Hazen granted an order for a
| temporary injunction on May 9, upon
the showing made by General Manager
H. U. Nudge in an affidavit filed with
the court and upon the petition by the
Santa Fe attorneys, o. J. Wood and A
A. Hurd.
The temporary injunction was allow
ed against Thomas L. Wilson, fourth
vice president, and J. D. Buckalew,
third vice president of the Information
al Association and 90 machinists and
/ apprentices in the Santa F'e shops at
Topeka.
The petitions in the case and the re-
straining orders were in printed form
for the purpose of serving a copy on
each of the 95 persons named in the
petition and against whom the order
ran
The petition set forth that the officers
and members of the association hau
| threatened to injure Santa Fe property
and to prevent other persons from tax
| ing their places and other of the usual
threats of strikers
A
| ing order was asked for and was is
sued by Judge HaZen. Th@ temporary
restraining order provided that the
said defendants and each and every
one of them be meantime restrained
by the injunction of this court from
interfering with the said plaintiff and
its said business, of the said pla1nt1fI.
or from entering upon the premises OF
the said plaintiff without permission
from it, or from harassing and an
noying the servants and agents in the
employ of the said plaintiff while en-
gagged in their duties, or from harass-
ing and annoying the said plaintiff in
the conduct of its business or in the
discharge of it's duties as q. railroad
company and common carrier or
from atteTla pting-- by threats or vio-
! lence to induce those now in the serv-
ice of the said plaintiff to leave its
employ, or from preventing, by vio-
Ience, threats and intimidation, or
from interfering in any manner with
the making up of trains or with the
operation of the same, or from inter
fering in any manner with the manu-
fact1re or repairing of locomotives.
engines, cars, or other rolling stock of
said plaintiff, or from preventing the
said plaintiff from carrying and trans
porting the United States mails as it
is required by law to do; or from
using threats or violence toward the
servants or agents of said plaintiff
while in the discharge of their duties,
or from IN any manner entering upon
motives, cars or property, or coming
into the shops of said plaintiff, unless
specially authorized or permitted to
do so by some duly authorized officer
of the plaintiff, or unless such enter
ing on the premises of said plaintiff is
rendered necessary in going to the
ticket offices, depOtS or other Offices of
said plaintiff for the purpose of trans
acting some lawful business with said
plaintiff as a common carrier; from
tampering with or attempting to tam
per with the machines, tools, cars,
engines, locomotives, appliances or
property of said PLAINTIFF, or in its
custody or under its control, so as to
inJure or destroy the same, or affect
the usefulness thereof, or to render
the same UNFIT, or to cripple the same
for the uses of said plaintiff in the
transaction of carrying on its busi-
ness or in the discharge of its duties
to the public or to the government of
the United States, or attempt to ac-
complish any such purpose by them
selves or any of them. That Upon
your peril you refrain, until the fur
ther order of this court, from doing
any or all of the above specified acts
or things, either openly or secretly:
and that the said plaintiff notify the
said defendants and each of them of
the hearing of the temporary injunc-
The above order was the one set aside
today by Judge Hazen. No testimony was
introduced IN court, only the attorneys,
Harvey & Osborn, for the strikers. ana
A A Hurd and o. J. Wood for the com
pany, being present Two affidavits were
submitted to the court to show what had
taken place since the order was issued
Judge Hazen did not think there was rea-
son for continuing the temporary injunc-
tlOn- The hearing of the application for
permanent injunction will come up at
some future Gate when the merits of the
case will be gone into and testimony win
be introduced by both sides on the ques-
ton Of a permanent injunction.
The strikers against whom the tempor-
aary Injunction was dissolved today are as
Thomas L. Wilson, J. d. BuckaIevv VIII
Der L. Stark, VIM. G. Imbler, Auldon r.
Morgan, August Gross, VIM. r. Tasker.
Wn. J. Deavitt, Vim. Nelson, Joel Beeh-
Ter, VIM Cremer, Henry O'Brien, Milton
Dwelly, Gustave Dreyer. Alfred 6. Nc
Kensie, Charles A DeRigna, Frank
Roach. Henry Heise, Otto r Becker.
w m It. h kremser, John NJ Shannon,
FRED Newman Frank J. Eccleston, John
w Sager, Frank Schramm. David H
Hollowell. Herman F. Clinton. Ira F.
Henry. Joseph L Chatham Rudolph Os-
David w. Flemming, Randolph Boyd,
Fred C. Boltz, TlOs. A Danna, Robert c.
Brown. Grant Gill. Erick F. Walgren,
Benz. f. Parrish, VIM H. AdamsOn, Jas.
c. Dwyer. Arthur Ruckert. John w Pus-
back, Levi H. Toliver. VIM a Stans-
field. VIM. Gordon. Thos- NJ Coughlin.
Robertson, Edward Smith, Frank Gray,
julius 5. Speath, Julius j. HaSley, Sam
uel A. Neil Bertram Manley, George H.
J. Arthur Sheldon. Walter A Wood.
Robert S. Bunnell, J. George Aye, Elmer
A. King Vim. A. Crook, VIM. H. Wiss-
Mcclure, Adam Jacobs. Wm- T. Wooters.
Thos. L. Stricklan. David Greeley, Ca
mile Van Lacy. VIM F. StoIl. John P.
Leonard, Ray A. Dean. George Ffnnie.