Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1904-10-26
r,,. Exception to the A'''''
'', ,Ioo ! Col Wall that lie is
A ObslractiOnist
$ CONTRARY 10 THE FACTS
Go. 4. ia, Dooc Everything Possible
S'' r, further Class Of Work
Referred To.

.. n. matter Of the cast south rem In,
10 W. Grade reduction spencer
~ .,a ",r'. takes emphatic exception mo, S 70
c'a"',. ,,,,op Of col, wall that ne
b, . ls,I, c1sv. c ..a evidently d''Ir,
cp' %s, ,he street shall not be poV .o,
a. a. contrary to the facts IN
'S ',,i' I.,,,r prepared by MI cIawson
. I. p .,o,y 70 COL Wall the former says
20 . ,,D' y COLONEL Is evidently laOorIns
oo error regarding my position
'.a. !. ,s r' r,yIns Of South Temple street
I,bs Eagle Gate. for he states
ca, u ~. NJ evidently DESTROYS that the
'..a., ,Nan not be paved at all when
'', absolutely contrary to the iac's ',,,l !
'''''D ..,,,o, of the board Of public
vas q 5 'ny Mr. Uooly's chairmanship'
WORKS ul'u ,n,N1tiye was taken for me
s ls,ng n South Temple street L". Yer. !
p'y ,ssds5 him as chairman, ana ussu
su..,'SS( oaorable method 70 turther 'h9
Ntil sDsvInp that thoroughfare, ana
wa .! W aver stood 40 the way OF any
] le's ,nT,rroyements OF any kind what
p ,,, an Nj the contrary J have USED my
s, ., ssorls 10 further mat class OF
r w ' y, oll times, and promise to 90
gO KAN N oor city is equal to all others
q rs class AL. .o,,,c,uar work OF
Az al wall Is so critical ] WIN
. sa,," MAJ prepared the first compre,
s ,.'lrn nlan or design In plaster ana
g%,Sm,tted Il 10 the city council ior
, XVII, ,nnroyql but before anal action
v % AIKEN the administration chahgeu
va Col Wall as chairman OF me
SosH Of public works. came forward
YAK man which has proved more
.,Sl,,l man anything suggested by
.s" olher citizen or taxpayer In ms
,s5l 10 carry out his pet scheme ne
Gent "A FAR as to voluntarily oher
WA Al $4,000 To hold the city harm
nv. ' IN ma event OF dissatisfied and IN
MA brorerty owners appealing to the
son1s for redress they could not obtain
,rom the city council. ] did remark 10
.oms members OF the board OF directors
N ma Utah Savings and Trust COM
ssry mai [ admired COL Wallis cour-
az, bul condemned severely HIS
@jsmtnt and that ] believed the bond,
Smurh complications that might arise,
Would he yalueless 10 the city The
wgsept condition justInes my belief,
ior after the work Is started on the
ban practically rs outlined by Col.
NAM il Il found to be entirely imprac-
uabh and the city engineer officially
states the reason why and II seems a
yey opp0rtunie time for Col, Wall 10
withdraw bis bond Of $4,000 which he
proposes 10 DO q his plan Is not carried
out deHtIeally with his Intent.
q represent very valuable property
N South Temple street. and have as
mech right 10 my opinions regarding
D, treatment Of that street for paving
nd Otherwise as Col Wall, and while
"a the legitimate and proper lire OF
criticisms, my opinion differs from his,
| have as much right to express II as
he do think that Il Is bad judgment
a. this time Of the year TO pillow up
South Temple street with no hope that
4 can be paved before April OF next
year and leave II IN an impossible con-
dlton, 80 that Il will be a source Of
annoyance and inconvenience 10 every
citizen who has occasion v use It dur
Ing The coming winter, do think that
Il an outrage TO the property owners
on he north side Of South Temple 10
have the street cut down In front Of
ihtIr respective properties 80 that II
VIII be necessary 10 place new APP
lIoaches thereto, and ] think II is a
greater outrage to fll M the south side
Of me street to a depth Of three and
ohe'haf Feet thus hurying the sidewalk
shd property beneath the road level.
These are things that | object to and
nave not been slow IN expressing my
election. Col, Wall to the contrary not
VihaaniIng.
/ II the work Is carried on as de-
sgned' The city IN my opinion, will
nave many lawsuits 10 answer and n
PrelItIon Of the North Main street
siade will result ia Unnecessary cost
% The taxpayers"