The Democratic advocate. [volume] (Westminster, Md.) 1865-1972, 1904-04-02
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.
Calvin T. Fringer. Assignee of Assignee of
Mortgage, Plaintiff, VS.. Susannah More
lock, ct al, Mortgagors, Defendants.
In Re. Bill of Complaint of Aggie NJ. More
lock

CALVIN L. trlnger. Assignee OF assignee OF
Mortgage, Plaintiff, VS.. Susannah More
lock, ct al, Mortgagors, Defendants.
In Re. Bill of Complaint of Aggie NJ. More
lock-
The object of this suit is to procure q decree
of said Court for the distribution of certain
signee of mortgage, among the creditors of
Susannah Moreock, deceased.
The Bill of Complaint states:
LIST. That Susannah MOrelock was in her
lifetime indebted unto your oratrIX in the
sum of One Thousand Dollars on promiSsory
note, dated January 3rd, 1903, payable one
day after date, which sum Is now overdue and
unpaid; said promiSSOry note is filed in said
cause and marked Exhibit c"
2nd. That the said Susannah Morelock de-
parted this life intestate in Carroll county,
State of Maryland on the 18th day of May,
1908, leaving surviving her her husband,
Samuel Morelock, and the following children,
her only hers.at law, namely Nicely A.
Frock, who is married to John II. Frock
Mary c. Stoner. who Is married to Charles b.
Stoner; Virginia r, Martin, who is married to
David Martin; Jacob o. Morel0ck, who Is
married to Elizabeth Moreiock; all defendants
10 the above entitled cause.
Bird. That the said Susannah Murelock
left. at the time of her death. personal prop
erty of the value OF about $33l.O0, which Is
largely insufficient TO pay her debts.
4th That the said Susannah MoreIock was,
at the time of her death. seized and possessed
of a farm containing l67 acres of land, more
or less. situated in the county and state atore
said, which farm Is fully described in the deed
of mortgage filed in this cause and marked
Exhibit B.
5th That said Susannah Morelnck. to
gelher with her said husband. Samuel More
lock, did, on the 9th day of April, 1891, exc
cute and pass unto a certain Thomas Coakley
their joint and several promissory note for
$1,000, payable u months after date, bearing
interest from date; to secure said promlsSory
note did execute to the said Thomas Coakley
a deed of mortgage bearing even date with
said prcmiSsorv note, which deed Of mortgage
is duly recorded among the Real Estate Mort
gage Records Of said county. in Liber B. +.
c.. No. 30, folio 439, &c; that said mortgage
and note were subsequently, to.wli, on the 9th
day of April, A. D., 1894, assigned TO Sarah
K. Fringer. wife of Calvin I. Frnger, aud
that subsequently. on the 10Th day of June,
1908, said Sarah r. Fringer assigned said
promissory note and deed OF mortgage to the
said Calvin I. Eringer for collection.
9th. That the said Calvin I. FrIuger did.
on the Ilih day of July, 1903, sell said real
estate which the said Susauuah M0rclocs
died seized aud possessed, and which j. de-
scrbed in said deed of mortgage, 10 David Il.
Lester at and for the sum Of $4,000. a. by
reference to the report Of sale filed ia the
above entitled cause viii fully show.
Eth That letters Of administration on the
personal estate of the said Iutes,sie wsrs
granted unto the said Jacob o. Moreiock by
the Orphans Court Of Carroll county, atore-
said, as by reference to exempliicaiIoa OF bis
letters herewith hled, marked Exhibit y.
viii fully show.
s,h. That the said Jacob o. Morclock did
sell the personal property 81 the said uics'aie.
eth That your Orairix IS ADVISED and be
lieves that, after the payment q the amount
due on said mortgage note and mortgage aud
proper expenses. there ~ll be q surplus ot
about Sl2Oo.Oo. whJch Surplus shoa.d be ap-
Piled 10 the psyInen; Of the said amour, due
your ogairlX and other creditors Of sad mites
tate according 10 their legal prlor3tis--
10th. That al the parties 10 this cause are
adults, above the age OF g~cafy oue wears. and
tina, they all reside In Carroll coun,y. Mary
land. except the said Mary C.. SioHcr and
Charles B. SionsF, her husband. sho reside
Adams county. IN the State 81 PenuSyl
wanna.
To the end. therefore.
ulingSiraior. mas -. forth Ig hls answer an
account oE the personal estate 81 the sar3 iH
,estHte. hos much thereof has been dispose .
OF by han in payment Of said interstate dyh's
or ogherwa,e. and What debts remain supAil-
OBJ That said Calvin 7 Fuager. assignee
ot Euce Of mortgage, may set forth lH h's
answer accouai Of the proceeds 81 the sad
sale Of the sad moriEsEvd properly,
&C. That an accn1nl may b. taken aadcv
the direction OF The Coarg Of the salI deUss, a.
aforesaid. Due 90 yogF ora,rix aud other cred
iturs Of said luieSfs,c. remaining uupa.d Ht the
personal estate Of said inicstair, and also %
the proceeds Of the sAId rial estate.
{Dl That the balance 81 proceeds of saIi
personal property, II any, and lhe balance ~
The proceeds Of aid mOrtgaEVd vval estate.
after the payment Of ths proper expenses ADD
charges, may BE- applied 70 the pAyuea, 81 the
said claim Of your crsiriK agd The claims oi
al other creditors Of the said Interstate accord
ing 20 their legal priority.
I'D That youf ogAtux aHy have sach
other aud further relief a. she Ia Equity nsy
be entitled; that William b Thomas ~as
made party plaintiff In the above enilticd
cause 90 December 2slh. 1898
l. u ihereupoa ordered. ihl- i5th tay %
March. A. d.. 1904. By the Circuit Cccrs !pT
Carroll coanIy, sitting IN E4s'ty. that The
plaintiff. by causing a copy # th's order 90 -
inserted ia some newspaper Paa.azhea 70 Car
roll county, aforesaid, once ln eaca Of 'oar
successive weeks before the 18th day oi April.
1904, give notice 20 the sid Mary c. S,0uvr
and Charles p. S,oaer. her husband, and
warn them 10 appear IN the SAID Coart, in
person or by solicitor, on OF before the s,h
dAy Of NAY. A D.. 1894. to sa0s cause Il
any they have, Shy a decree ought not 10 BE-
passed as prayed
DAVID p. SNELSER, Clerk,
True CoPy.-Tesi.
marie 81 DAVID p SxElSFE, Clerk.