Rock Island Argus. (Rock Island, Ill.) 1893-1920, 1904-12-31
Those Returnable at January
Term Of the CircuiG
Court.
WILL BE CONVENED MONDAY
An Adjournment to
Tuesday.


be convened, either by Judge w. H.
Gest or Judge f. c. Graves. probably
| by the former. Immediately there will
be an adjournment to O'Clock Tues
| day morning. At the latter hour the
grand jurors and first panel of the
petit jury have been instructed to re-
port for duty. having been told that
they will not be required to be on
tand Monday, as no business will be
| transacted on that date, the mere for
mality of converting the term to be
observed. The suits that are return
able at the January term are as fol-
lows, the list not including those that
have been carried on the docket from
term to term:
On Law Side.
Peoples Credit company VS.. w. II.
Weaver. ct al. appeal by defendant.
NJ. A. Carlburg VS.. Christopher Sar-
vey; appeal by defendant.
c. W.. Swanson VS.. Daniel Fisher:
appeal by defendant.
James Clegg VS.. c.. r. l. & p. railway
company; appeal by defendant.
German Fire Insurance company VS.
D. J. Webb, ct al; attachment.
Lemberg & Detlefsen VS.. Anton
Schieberl; assumpsit.
Jack McCaffrey VS.. Kahlke Bros;
replevin.
George Lippert VS.. Moline Engrav
ing company; appeal by defendant.
Charles F.. Hemenway VS.. Canada
North Dakota Land company; attach
ment.
Village of Moline VS.. Isaac Liven-
slime; appeal by defendant.
Harry Wait VS.. c. w. Schricker:
assumpsit.
Edward A. Martin VS.. Iowa Wood &
Sand company; assumpsit.
People. ex rel William Killing VS..
c.. r. /. & p railway company; man
damus.
William Killing VS.. c.. r. l. &. p,
company: assumpsit.
Moline Trust & Savings bank. adj
ministrator VS.. David A. Schiller, ct
al: debt.
Moline Trust & Savings bank. adj
ministrator, VS.. David A. Schuler;
debt.
George Pisson VS.. Republic Iron &
Steel company: case.
William J. McClusky: assumpsit.
Mabelle l.. Crawford. administra-
trix. VS.. c.. NJ. & ST p. railway COM
pany; case.
Village of Hampton VS.. c.. NJ. & ST.
T. railway company; debt.
j. X. Sweeney company VS.. Ed
Ward: appeal by defendant.
Henry l.. Bullen VS.. John A. Lind
berg: assumpsit.
Millie Coulter VS.. Travellers Pro-
tective Association of America; as
sumpsit.
J. r. Carey VS.. John Brown: case.
German Fire Insurance company VS..
Don J. Webb: assumpsit.
Julia Thompson VS.. Tri-City Railway
company; case.
Daniel G.. White VS. c.. r. l. & +.
railway company: ejectment.
Lenore Skinner by DIR. f. Bradford.
next friend VS.. Myra \. Smith; case.
Frieda Cordes. executor estate of
II. F. Cordes. deceased VS.. David J.
Brown; sci ia revive judgment.
Fritz Mengel vs.. S. Rich; assumpsit. |
Mueller Lumber company VS.. JOS
eph L. Assay: assumpsit.
Johanna Okerberg VS.. Tri-City Rail- !,
way company; case.
Nina Ament VS.. c.. r. I. & p. rail !,
way COMPANY: case.
Charles Uilemeyer. administrator vs.. ,
Atkinson & Olof; sci ia revive judg- !
ment.
Hannah Z. Wright VS. c., r. /. & p.
railway company; case.
Sarah j. Johnston VS.. Wickliffe
Kunckle ct al; assumpsit.
Muscatine Lumber 4 Box company
VS.. w. c. Allen. ct al; appeal by de-
PENDANT.
On ChnBc~ry side.
Maria NJ. ScuIiy VS.. Daniel Scully;
divorce.
Julia Bulinge VS.. Harry Bulinge; di-
vorcc
Nellie V. Bourdeau VS.. Samuel Bour-
deau: divorce and injunction.
Harry Girt VS.. Jessie Girt; divorce.
James ID. Wilcox VS.. Jessie Will /
cox: divorce and injunction.
Anna b. Rice VS. Carl Rice; divorce
and injunction.
George w. McCaskrin VS.. H. b. Hub
bard: injunction.
Margaret F. Boles VS. George A.
Boles; divorce and injunction.
Priscilla Condor VS.. William Con-
don; divorce.
Anna Hunt. guardian. etc. VS.. Will
liam Hunt. ct al; petition to- sell real
estate.
Clara Farrell VS.. Raymond Farrell;
separate maintenance.
Charlotte =. Smith VS.. Oscar Smith
divorce.
Charles Rugelbrugge vs.. Eda Rugel
brugge. known sometimes as Eda Log
lest: divorce.
Frances Wittick, ct al vs.. Thomas
Wittick: partition.
Jennie Judisch VS.. Amos Judisch:
divorce
Ezra Wilcher VS.. Theophilus Cauff