The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1904-03-02

Jack weday and Messrs. winslov
and Stone being sent from Honolulu
to put her off the premises.
The PLAINTIFF claims that the Super
| intendent of Public instruction claim
ed in behalf of the Board of Education
the right and title to hold and occupy
the premises. She claims that for the
part High Sheriff Brown took in the
J premises he is liable and responsible
for all acts done by his deputy in Ko-
ma district. Defendant LCrrin A. An
drews was Sheriff of Hawaii and was
| in control of the police force of the
island of Hawaii, and George Kamau-
oha was the Deputy Sheriff. Ella H
| Paris, she claims, represented the
| Board of Education.
Mrs. Baker alleges that on or about
September 1, 19OS the defendants mali
and her husband arrested and taken
in custody from their home in Kona.
On September she alleges that Ka-
mauoha appeared before the district
judge and sworc to a complaint against
her and procured a warrant for her
arrest. On September Deputy Sheriff
Kamauoha took the plaintiff into GUS
tody and conveyed her over a stretch
gether with her husband, to the village
of Hookena. The arrest was effected
about 6 a. m. and she was detained in
custody until D. m. She claims she
and was not given an opportunity to
go to trial. The case was continued
until October 5, on which date the
complaint against her was nolle pross-
certain persons to enter upon the prem
ises and the house while she was at
Hookena and endeavored to force the
children from the place. Mrs. Baker
scene and drove Ella Paris from the
house. For this action she claims dam
ages in the sum of $4,000.
In the second count Of her complaint
the plaintiff alleges that on Septem-
Der 10 the defendants caused Messrs
Weday, Stone, Winslow and Overend
to eject herself and family from the
house. She says:
THE defendants caused certain
rough, violent and lawless persons, to
wit, one Jack Weday, a pugilist and
prizefghter, and one Stone and one
Winslow, to proceed from Honolulu to
Overend to proceed from Hilo to Alae
and on September II they were joined
by defendant Kamauoha. That all
these persons proceeded after dark on
the night of said last day to the prem
jses occupied as aforesaid by this plain |
tiff, and then and there forcibly ana |
without process of law, certain of these |
persons being armed with variety |
the house and living and sleeping
rooms, and then and there greatly
alarmed and terrified the plaintiff and |
her husband and family, and then and
here ordered her to forthwith remove
md vacate from said house and land.
Her husband declining to do SO, they
threatened in loud and menacing
roice, and with the display of letha1
that they would forcibly re-
move the plaintiff and her husband,
amily and belongings from said house
nd premises. After much pleading by
he plaintiff and her husband. said We
ay, Stone, winsIow. Kamauoha and
)verend consented to defer the ex-
ulsion until daylight, but Weday,
tone, winslow, Overend remained in
ne house and in the sleeping room of
ne family during the remainder of the
light.
THAT in the morning of Sunday, Sep
,mber 10, said weday. Stone, Winslow,
and Overend, forcibly and
18th great violence and insult to the
laintiff, did physically assault and
AIRY, convey and conduct and expel
lie plaintiff and her husband and fami-
from the dwelling. and did also re
ove the household goods and deposit
j the same on the public highway"