The state herald., 1904-11-04
Another GIaring Instance Of
Democratic Juggling with
Government Statistics.
LABOR BULLETIN IGNORED
Ia Order to Make Political Capital AMI
Also to Misreprescnt Conditions
and Deceive Voters-Cam.
paign Textbook Trickery.

An examination Of the files Of the
Democratic newspapers for the past few
weeks and of the recently issued Demo
cratic Campaign Text Book discloses a
disposition on the part of the managers
of the Democratic campaign to discredit
the report on wages and cost of living
made by the Bureau of Labor In its July
Bulletin no 53). In view of the repu-
tation Of Commissioner Wright for abso-
lute fairness In the collection and pres
entation of statistics 1t Is of some in
terest at this time to review his report
In the light of the indignant criticisms
which 1t has brought forth. and 1t may
be said at the outset that careful ex-
animation Of the report reveals the some
what remarkable fact that practically
every criticism made has been answered
in the Bulletin itself. Indeed, 1t would
almost appear that the compilers OF the
Text Book either did not make use OF
the Bulletin or had no desire to be con-
vinced of the truth of the figures pub
lished therein, and that their insinua-
tions and clumsy mlsstatements Of fact
were made for the purpose Of mislead-
ing the public mind. Let us proceed
to the most specific Of the somewhat
vague charges that are made.
1t is first charged that the report pub
llshed in the Bulletin was Quoting the
Text Book prepared ostensibly as an
Official document, but in reality, 1t seems,
for the special use Of the Republican
Campaign Committee" The "well-nigh
conclusive" evidence submitted In sup
port Of this charge consists of a state.
ment by Secretary Shaw in June last
that such q report would be published.
AZ a matter Of fact, 1t had been known
to the public for several years that the
Bureau of Labor was engaged In collect
ing data for such a report and the por-
tion Of the report relating to cost OF liv-
ing was actually published in Bulletin
40 as early as November. l903-nearly
eight months previous to Secretary
Shnw's statement.
Not What Democrats Wanted.
1t Is clearly stated in the Bulletin
itself that the investigation was begun
in the winter of i900-190l. and without
doubt the records OF the bureau and
the testimony Of hundreds of manufac-
turers whose pay rolls were examined
would have proved the truth of the state.
ment, had the truth been desired in Dem
ocratic quarters. But no-for political
reasons, the facts disclosed were not
pleasing, and 1t seemed necessary TO
adopt some method. apparently any
method that would detract from an ex-
hibit OF q remarkable condition of indus
trial depression was desired. Conclusive
evidence In at hand that the gathering
of these statistics was begun In the win
ter Of 1000l00l. and that they were
not cooked up" for the occasion a.
charged. but II 10 not TO be expected
that this absurd charge will be with.
drawn, although as a matter Of fact the
figures a. to wages and cost Of living
referred to have been corroborated by in
dependent Investigations which have been
concluded by the State bureaus Of ssv.
eral important States.
II is charged also that by giving equal
weight TO unimportsnt articles of con-
sumption and articles Of prime neces.
sity an unduly email increase In cost Of
living Is secured. II is gravely asserted
that nutmegs, pepper. alum, etc.. are
given equal weight with such important
articles as lard, beef. eggs. -four. etc.
This charge might. indeed. be convinc-
ing IL 1t contained even n slight element
of truth. Unfortunately for the criticism,
however. the Bulletin itself states that
all articles OF food are weighed exactly
according to the amount consumed In the
average workingman's family. In this
Bulletin the exact quantities are given
and the method clearly explained. so
that the charge can only be construed as
u deliberate attempt TO mislead the vot-
ers of the country aud not as an error
on the part OF the compiler Of the text
book. As a matter OF fact the most
careful search Of Bulletin 53 shows that
the unimportant articles referred TO, such
as putty, nutincgs. nlum. pepper. etc.
are not even mentioned therein. These
articles are found, however, among the
2OO articles entering into nn index OF
wholesale prices which has been publish.
ed annually by the bureau for the past
three years. but this index has no con.
nection whatever with the report on cost
OF living. One pauses TO wonder at the
fact that the Democratic managers are
50 lacking In resource nv 10 adopt the
clumsy trick OF injecting figures from
another report Into n discussion OF the
report on cost OF living. ani pretend that
they were part OF the latter report. Il
must be assumed that In this section
there was the studied intention to mis-.
represent and convey an impression To
the public utterly contrary TO the truth
aud entirely nnwnrranted by the facts.
The entire portion OF the Text Book un.
der the caption "Absur,lity OF Republi.
can Averages" (psEes I2t aud 1851. and
much that follows on pages 100 and i2I.
Is Of the character just mentioned.
A Ludiersas conpiain.
The further complaint that the figures
for cost Of living are based on retail
prices instead OF wholesale can only 10
understood by assuming that the use Of
the latter would have given the Demo.
cratic campaign managers q little less
discomfort. Bulletin So clearly explains
the reasons for the use OF retail prices
n. q basis for cost Of living In prefer
ence to the wholesale. II IL true that
Wholesale prices have been used At times
to indicate the trend Of cost Of living,
hut they are considered by economists
~ unreliable for the purpose of indicat.
Ing the extent Of the increase or IL.
crease. Until the present day investiss.
tion by the Bureau Of Labor no records
of retail prices covering any consider.
able period had ever been collected, NV.