La Junta tribune., 1904-09-24
WHAT IT MEANS.
The 0igaiacascs Of the Vermont
viceory.

The 0igaiacascs Of the Vermont
Victory.
While It would be the sheerest folly
for Republican managers to accept the
Vermont victory as q certain augury OF
RooSevelt's election next November. or.
to relax In their efforts to insure that
result. II cannot be denied that the b.
600 plurality is q most reassuring and
significant fact. That this In 10 10 not
because q succession of statistical coin
cidences where a shrinkage Of the Re
publican plurality in Vermont In Sep
tember has presaged q national Demo-
cratic victory IN November. but because
the influences affecting the individual
units In one State In this election are
national In their nature and are effective
throughout the republic.
IL the issue in the November election
were confined to the tariff question 1t
would be impossible to infer from Yer
mont's $1,000 Republican plurality
what would be the drift in New York.
Connecticut or Indiana, because the vo-
ters of these three States study the
tariff question through very different
spectacles from those OF the farmers of
Vermont. From the day in 1851 when
her late Senator Justin 8. Morrill, In
troduced the war revenue tariff measure.
which bore his name in the House of
Representatives, Vermont has never wav-
cred in her support Of the Republican
policy of protection. Other States have
wobbled. as the politicians have played
upon the credulity of their industrial
classes, but Vermont has stood As firm
as her own everlasting hills.
But in the present campaign the
Democracy has chosen to thrust Its ira
tiitional clamor for free trade into the
ckground and has arrayed itself
against the American spirit Of aggres-
sive. progressive expansion, Of which
Theodore Roosevelt is the living en-
bodiment.
To-day the Republicans stand for ma
tional action, advancement and life; the
Democrats for national inaction. retro
gression and death. The issue 10 between
DOING and DON'T.
Such an issue appeals to voters In
Vermont precisely as it appeals to those
OF Oregon or Arkansas. The restricted
local view and interest 10 swallowed up
In the broader prospect, and men vote
a. Americans and not a. citizens Of this
or that State.
To this issue Oregon last June re-
sponded Go ahead" and Vermont mere
~ echoes back across the continent go
aheadw
Even Arkansas shows signs Of wakin:
from the lotus-eating dream Of Demo-
cracy that q nation can advance with
out exertion and force by marking time
in front Of the marble efigies Of Jeffer-
son and Jackson. who II they were alive
would be marching in the ranks Of action
and progress.
This, then, is the significance Of the
Vermont election. that on the issue con-
tsined In the word Forward! persona
fed. II our opponents will have II %.
in Theodore Roosevelt. represented In
every line of financial, industrial and
diplomatic achievement. demanding In
creased expenditures for the army, the
navy. the postal service and every de-
partment Of government care Of the
peoples interests-vermont represents
the onward trend Of American thought.
This, and not the mere fact that Yer
mont went Republican by $1,000 votes.
gives an assurance Of q great Republi-
can victory next November.