Ottumwa tri-weekly courier. [volume] (Ottumwa, Iowa) 1903-1916, 1904-10-27
FoRTY-TWo CASES APPEAR ON
DISTRICT COURT DOCKET.
SIX NEW DIVORCE SUITS.
Small Number of Cases is a Record
Breaker for WapeIlo County =
Judge EicheIberser to Preside Dur.
Ing October Term-The Cases.


for trial at the October term Of the
Wapello county district term of court
which opened Monday morning at the
court house with Judge F. w, Eichel-
berger as the presiding Judge. There
VIII pc no lack OF business, however,
curing the term for the docket is
nlleo with old cases enough to occupy
the attention of the court for two or
three terms.
OF the new cases but six are d.
yorces, another fact that is a record
breaker. Of the total of forty-two,
twenty-five are listed as law cases.
nineteen as chancery and one is state
case.
The new cases are as follows:
chaneery.
ottumwa Turnverein VS.. J. f. Ter
sey, Ut al. Suit for injunction restrain.
ing the defendant from removing Ger.
tain material from the building owned
by the plaintiff company. known as the
turner Hall and leased by the defend.
ant. Jaques & Jaques are the attor.
neys for the plaintiff.
Mamie 3. Mckee VS.. C. C. Mckee.
petition for divorce on the grounds of
desertion and on statutory charges,
Lowenberg & Coen, attorneys for the
plaintiff.
Levi jackson ct al. VS.. Elizabeth
Derby, ct al. Suit for partition of GER
tain described real estate. Smith &
Lewis are attorneys for the plain.
tiff.
j. 3. Hall VS.. William MoseIy. Suit
for injunction against defendant who
is alleged to be conducting an immoral
show. w. H. G. Jaques, attorney for
the plaintiff.
Eben Peck vs. G. w. Tullis. Suit for
Judgment requiring specific perform.
ance of contract regarding certain de-
scribed real estate. J. w. Lewis, at.
tOrney for the plaintiff.
Susie A. Potten VS.. D. Potten. Peti.
hon for divorce on the grounds of cruel
and tnhuman treatment, desertion, me-
Elect and habitual intoxication. w. w.
Epps. attorney for the plaintiff.
Estella Lewis VS.. Martin Lewis. Pc.
htion for divorce on the grounds of
cruelty, the constant use of vile and
obscene names applied to the petit
toner. Petitioner asks for $1,5GO ali.
mony. Jaques & Jaques, attorneys for
the plaintiff.
Maggie Wentworth vs.. B. f. Went
worth. Petition for divorce on the
grounds of habitual Drunkenness.
George B. Baker, attorney for the
plaintiff.
James A. Sweeney, ct al vs.. An
thony Sweeney, ct al. Petition for par
tition Of the estate of the late Pat.
rick Sweeney. Smith & Lewis, at
torneys for plaintiff.
Frank M. Tinsley VS.. L. D. Ray, ct
al Petition to quiet title to certain
described real estate. S. Siberal, at.
torney for the plaintiff.
Robert Strother vs.. Beulah Strother.
Petition for divorce on the ground of
desertion. Work & Work, attorneys
for the plaintiff.
N. M. Martin VS.. w. ]. Martin. Pc
tition for divorce on statutory grounds.
Mary Grooms named, as the cores
pondent. B. W. Scott, attorney for the
plaintiff.
Pleas McKim VS.. Inez McKim. Pc.
tition for divorce on the grounds of de-
sertion. w. w. Epps, attorney for
the plaintiff.
Carrie Spears VS.. John Spears. Pc
tition for divorce on the grounds of
cruel and inhuman treatment and de.
sertion. B. w. Scott, attorney for the
plaintiff.
j. F. Bauer VS.. Ed. Schuckrow. Suit
for Injunction, restraining the defend
ant from selling or disposing of GER
tain described notes. Gilmore and
Moon, attorneys for the plaintiff.
Eff1e Erickson VS.. Oscar Erickson.
Petition for divorce on the grounds
OF cruel and inhuman treatment and
vile and abusive language. B. w.
Scott, attorney for the plaintiff.
Bertha Cline VS.. Welday Lutz. Suit
for modification of divorce decree. Pc
titioner states that she and defendant
were divorced and that the custody of
q minor child was given to the father
Petitioner now asks that the decree be
so modified that she may have posses
sion of the child on the
ground that she is married again
and is able to take care Of the child
in proper manner while at the pres
emit time the child is cruelty and negli-
gently taken care of by the second
wife Of the defendant. Clyde Sparks
is the attorney for the plaintiff.
George W. Davidson VS.. Flora and
~. n. IlDSOu. Sult lOI lOTGClOSuTo Oh /
mortgages as security for $72.14 due on
promissory notes. Lowenberg & Coen,
attorneys for the plaintiff.
J. A. Gardner ct al VS. National Coal |
Mining Co. Petition to quiet title to
certain described real estate. Work
& Work, attorneys for the plaintiff.
M. Crist vs.. Carey Crist. Petition
for divorce on the grounds of desertion.
]. W. Poston, attorney for the plain
tiff.
Eva G. Cornell vs. Charles Cornell.
Petition for divorce on the grounds Of
cruel and inhuman treatment. Petit
toner also asks for the care and GUS
tody of their two minor children.
Jaques & Jaques, attorney for the
plaintiff
One Lone State Case.
State of Iowa VS.. Jake Kensler. Suit
to COMPEL maintenance of child born
to Mary Elizabeth Roland. and Of
which Kensler is alleged to be the
father. A. c. Steck, attorney for the
plaintiff.
yxr xxy o,D.; Al