The Minneapolis journal. [volume] (Minneapolis, Minn.) 1888-1939, 1904-09-15

1901, for $25, which Is all the money the state
ever received for timber on this section.
Cancelled, but Cut.
Section o. Township III. Range 25, Permit
No. l134.-Issued Oct. 20, 1894, expiring in 1896,
at feet at 8
Reason not given. On Feb Z. 1900, a cruiser
reports that this section all cut years ago..
No report of any cutting, however, appears on
the stumpage record. nor, that any money was
paid wor the cutting referred to by the cruiser.
Section SO, Township 49,. Range 20, Permit
No. 9s7-Issued Sept. 16 1893, to Knox s De
not stated in permit, sale price 81 .25 per thou
sand. There is no surveyor generals report nor
payment on account OF this permit given, nor
any effort to payment under the con-
tract.
Section 6. Township SO. Range &c, Permit
No 4s-Issued Oct. 20, 1856, to George Faux
81 rs per thousand sade price not given.
There is no surveyor generals report nor
payment noted on the stumpag e record on account
20, 1899, 10. 900 feet sapling standing, which was
sold for $35 cash at county sale.
Section 1e, Township S., Range 2e, Permit
given, to S. D. Wilson estimated at 100000
feet and sold at 81 So per thousand.
The old stumpage book has the following nota-
this permit shown on the stumpage record.
Cruiser Dedon, on Aug. 10, 1897, reports that
We're 1000 feet Of pine LETT Which was sold
for cash Oct. 21, 1897, for $50. There is no
evidence that any o effort o was made to obtain pay
thousand under permit No. 439. LII.
Section SO, Township so. Range q, Permit
No. 5o-Issued Oct. %, 1886, to Mccarthy &
ed at Co. 600 feet and sold at So per thousand.
Another permit. No. 49, was issued Dec. Z
1891. to T. R. Foley. expiring in 1893, estimated
at 100000 feet, and sold at 81 per thousand.
q
ment reported for either of these two permits.
In 1900, still another permit issued, No.
sale for $500. Cruiser Dedon reports Sept 81.
1899, THAT there was pine cut on this section
years ago." This cut. however does not appear
anywhere and no payment has been made to the
Section 49, Township 49, Range %, Permit
No. e13-'ssued Sept. 20, 1891. to Hall & Ducey
100000 feet, and sold at 81 per thousand.
There il surveyor generals report nor
payment noted on the stumpnge record on account
of this permit. : -.
Section SO, Township 1870. Range q, Permit
No. 11s2.-Issued Oct. 20. 1894, to c.. J. John"
son, expiring in 1896, estimated at 100000 feet
and sold at $1.60 per thousand. ....~, .-g.
There is record Of any payment nor any
surveyor generals report on account of this
permit. Cruiser Chase reports, Sept %, 1893,
that there were $50. 900 feet cut last winter ana
that there were 10000 feet standing. There is,
no record of any payment for this reported cut.
In the fall Of 1898, what was left was sold at
cash sale for $75.
Section 16, Township AL Range 80, Permit
No.. 729-Issued Dec. 7. 1891. to r. B. Walker,
expiring in 1898, estimated at 1000 feet and
sold for 81 so per thousand. -.
The old stumpage book contains the memoran-
da. Ibid not cut TIMBER There is no further
information on the old or the stumpage
records concerning this permit.
Another permit, No. 1885 was issued Oct. 20
1894. to the Minnesota Logging company, expir-
Ing in 1896. estimated at $50, 600 feet and sold
at 81 per thousand. There is no report from
fha nro1 -,4
been made account Of this permit.
Cruiser Mckenzie reports in December $685.
that there 100000 feet standing. This
amount was sold at cash sale, Jan. 4, 1901. to
the H. G. Akeley Lumber company for $3.50
cash. There is evidence Of any accounting
for the difference Of $4,000 feet, or that any
effort was made to locate It.
No Effort to Collect. ...
Section 10, Township 14e, Range SO, Permit
No. s4s-1ssued Sept. H. 1892, to William
sauntry, expiring in 1894. estimated at $780, 900
| feet and sold at 81. so per thousand. 50.
There Is record of any surveyor generals
report, nor any payment noted on the stumpage
| record Nov. 30, 1895. Cruiser Mcclellan re-
ports 'new cutting, 100000 feet dead and killed,
cut on three sides and estimated to be $500, 600
| feet Left - = = =.
| The 2,5oo,ooo feet were sold under permis
SOB, on Dec 49, 1895, at $3.50 per thousand. to
S., G. ,Bagley. The surveyor general reported q
cut under that permit Of 2, 585, $50 feet April
| 49, 1896, which was paid for. No. record Of
Z
Mcclellan. Note the vide difference in esti-
| mates. - ~.
| Section Is, Township 14o, Range 81, Permit
| No. 1137.-Issued Oct. 20, 1894, to Ray W.
JONES' expiring In 1896. estimated at 100000
feet and sold at S1.75. per thousand. -, 49,.
There Is no surveyor generals report nor any
| payment noted account of this permit. Crus-
er Mckenzie reports. March IS, 1902 ''old cut
tings. cut all around that there were co. 900 feet
| left" This 1000 feet sold Dec. 10, 1902,
for $3.50 cash. The old cuttings referred to by
| M no
made to the state for the same. 49,
| Section so, Township 40. Range 81. Permit
No. 1142-1ssued Oct. 20, 1894 to Ray W. Jones,
| expiring in 1896. estimated at $4,000 feet and
| sold for $1.75 per thousand
| No surveyor generals report nor any payment
noted account of this permit Cruiser Nc
Kenzie reports, March II, 1902, that there were
''new cuttings" cut all around. 5000 feet left.
This 5000 feet was sold for cash in 1902, bring
ing SIS. The new cuttings reported by Nc.
| Kenzie not accounted for. -
This Is All Gone.
The "Schedule No. 90 is here given
in full. It is simply a tabulated
statement Of permits in force when R.
G. Dunn became state auditor, on which
no payment was ever received, and no
record remains to show what became of
the timber on the sections named.
Whether it is still standing after ten
years, or cut long ago, no one seems
to know. The schedule is as follows:
SCHEDULE NO. 3. -,
| Estimated
Descrip- Permit Year Amount Of Price
| tin, Tscned rriuhor nor N