The Independent. [volume] (Honolulu, H.I.) 1895-1905, 1904-10-26
RECENT EVENTS.

Since writing the above three things
have happened to which l wish to re-
fer, namely the removal of Messrs.
Brown and Chillingworth, an editorial
in the Star of October Goth entitled
Undated Resigna tions," and an inter-
view by the Governor appearing in the
Star of yesterday.
And first as to the removal of the
High Sheriff and his Deputy. This is
an incident that is at present filling
the public mind UP to this time the
facts are not before u.s. and until they
are, no final decision or judgment up
on the question as to whether Brown
and Chillingworth are right or wrong or
are guilty of misconduct justifying their
removal can be reached. There are
certain phases of that question, how
ever, which have reached point where
they can be publicly discussed. The
incident serves to illustrate that the
Democrats have been right in contend
ing from the first that the powers of
| the Governor and the extent of his
authority are vital issues in this cam
paign and must be met and discussed
by any party laying claim to the con-
fidence of the people.
And this incident illustrates again
how thoroughly misguided the Repub-
lican or executive machine has been in
it's attempts to contend that Governor
Carter is not and cannot be an issue
this campaign, and that any attempt to
do SO is factious, senseless and un-
businesslike.
The Democratic party has foreseen
the disorder that would inevitably grow
out of the adoption of mistaken con-
ceptions of executive power and its
| limitations, and has sounded the alarm
| seasonably, and led the community to
understand and appreciate the situa-
ton while the executive machine has
been proclaiming loudly that neither
| the Governor nor his acts are to be
considered an issue this coming cleo
ton. 1t may be said by those who be-
lieve that Brown and Chillingworth are
In the wrong that the incident illus
trates the wisdom of demanding I'M
dated designations from the heads Of
| departments.
Our reply as Democrats is, first, that
whether it would be best to have these
heads of departments hold office at the
Il
| does not permit it. An evasion of the
| law is violation of it, and we stand
! for the enforcement of law which
| in this instance requires that
! these officials shall hold Office for four
| years, and shall be removed from office
| only by the Governor with the consent
| of our local Senate. In the SECOND place
| the Democrats say that if the issue is
| raised whether the law shall be chang
| ed so that the Governor may law
| fully have absolute control of these
| powers which he now unlawfully
| usurps, the Democratic party will
stand first, last and all the time "a
| gainst the enlargement of his powers
over and above what is now allowed
| him by the Organic Act. They believe
| that Congress was right in subdividlns
| the executive power and making the
heads Of departments independent of
the Governor and of each other.
| They decline TO decide the ques-
| ton on the mere eXpediency
of the hour or by considering that 1t
may have proved convenient in one or
two particular cases in the past to have
had the undated resignation sys-
tenn in vogue 1t does not
follow therefore that a permanent
or any diet of undated resignation is
the best thing for this commonwealth.
We as Democrats protest against such
| views Such logic would result in this.
If We had bad Governor and good de-
partments then we would clamor to
have the heads of these departments
made independent of the Governor and
vice versa. The issue must not be de-
cided in that way.
EXAMPLE FROM MONARCHY.
We had an experience in the his
tory of this country that ought to have
taught us better In 1864 Kamehamelnl
V, believing that the people had too
much power and the executive too lit
tie, arbitrarily promulgated new con-
stitution which gave the executive
more power and the people less, and
during his reign and because he was
a man of good sense and knew how
far to go and where to stop, the peo-
pie felt no inconvenience from the con-
stitution thus promulgated Events
seemed to justify the making of con-
stitution to fit the particular sovereign
then on the throne, but what happen