Northern Wisconsin advertiser. [volume] (Wabeno, Wis.) 1898-1925, 1904-10-06

Frouucer OF revenue. the Democratic par
ty in Congress refused TO amend il SO
that 1t could produce enough revenue.
The saying. Millions for defense, but
J not one cent for tribute" in this case
might have been expressed, millions of
cost to the country in increasing deficit
and loss of credit rather than one cent
OF protection to any industry in which
Democratic leaders themselves did not
happen to have some personal financial
interest, like coal and sugar"
WHEN NERO PLAYED A FID-
DIE WHILE ROME BURNED HE
SHOWED NO MORE UTTER IN
DIFFERENCE TO THE INTERESTS
OF HIS COUNTRY THAN THE
LEADERS OF THE DEMOCRATIC
PARTY IN CONGRESS DID IN
THAT DISTRESSFUL YEAR 1894
WHEN THEY PLAYED PETTY
POLITICS. AND ALSO THE MAR
kET FOR SUGAR STOCK, AND
WITH BLIND INDIFFERENCE TO
A FINANCIAL SITUATION THAT
WAS ALREADY DANGEROUS,
| PUSHED TO IT'S PASSAGE A
BILL THAT IN TURN WAS TO
PUSH THE NATION TO THE VERY
VERGE OF BANKRUPTCY.
| The stone Instead of the Loaf.
The one single proffer of relief from
the Wilson bill deficit during the entire
session of the E'ifty-third Congress, Dem
| ocratic in both branches, was bill d.
| recting the treasury to coin and use the
| Soa,OOQO03 "seigniorage" theoretically
| acquired by the government in buying
! silver at the market price and paying it
out in ever-yalued silver dollars.
| This bill was case of offering to the
financially distressed nation a stone
when loaf was asked for, for with the
gold reserve crumbling to pieces owing
TO the increasing desire of persons APP
pretending slump to the silver basis
to exchange paper and silver money for
gold, and owing to the Entertainments of
the government itself upon the gold re
| serve because of the increasing deficit,
1t was obviously case of trying to sup
| ply the straw to break the camefs back
to furnish this additional load of silver
for the gold reserve to carry at parity
| with gold
But what did the Democratic Con
gress care if the seigniorage bill was to
further damage the credit of the coun-
| try? Never for a moment did the Dem
ocrats care to go back on free trade.
| even to prevent a deficit in the treas
ury, and never for moment did they
care to go back on free silver, even t,
prevent the fatal consequences to the
national credit that the increasing deficit
| involved.
The scigniorage BILL however was for
| tunately vetoed by President Cleveland,
who on the silver question at least was
1 .s,rltt hill 4
| whom credit is due for refusing to con-
cede anything to the free silver senti-
ment during the same period when AL
ton b. Parker and Henry G. Davis We're
both actively aiding and abetting free
silver with their money and with their
| votes.
Vindictive Treatment of the Pros
perity Goose.
The Democratic party during thost
four years acted as if it deliberately
sought to kill the goose that lays tn,
Golden egg of prosperity. 1t was cas-,
of give the goose a hit in the head with
| il big stick then in order to ward of
any returning signs of animation, a more
severe hit, this time in the heart and
then, lest there should be few sparks
of vitality left a violent kick with the
foot, and then another and then another
And there is nothing in the Democratic
platform this year. or in the personal
| records of the Democratic candidates
| Messrs. Parker and Davis, to suggest
that the Democratic party would not
again attempt the killing of the prosper
ity goose if it got the chance.
The Democrats want reduction in the
tariff, but unless they should pursue
Aggardly, drastic policy of cutting down
| present expenditures in furtherance OF
the honor and prosperity of the nation.
| they would need every bit of the present
| revenues from the tariff to make both
ends meet. However, even by pursu
ing a policy of ultra niggardliness in ex
penditures for the public good, extrav.
/ agance in other ways, coupled with theii
tariff revision policy, would probably
more than neutralize such saving and
lnecessitate large bond issues. Why should
the intelligent voters of the United
States give the Democratic party the
slightest chance to allow history to re-
peat itself in another doleful chapter of
incompetence, scandal, business disaster
and ha ID times for all classes of people :
| Parker and Davis belong to the same
school as Cleveland as regards free trade,
except that Davis has been protection
list when protection to himself through a
high tariff on coal was involved. But
rs regards free silver, neither of them
showed the moral strength that Cleve
land showed in trying to prevent tine
prosperity of the country from being ut
terly crushed-for while Cleveland
fought free silver, and fought it hard
Parker and Davis both voted for it.
| Parker and the Trusts.
| Trust magnates having furnished the