The Washburn times. [volume] (Washburn, Wis.) 1896-1976, 1904-01-28

argued too without grain reason would be
better for the town to buy the lighting plant and
fore incorporate city Supposng that Washburn
should do this and then incorporates cwhat
result? Simply this The outside territory
mbursed for their share charge Should city decide
buy these plants then the city itself will have else settle
with.
There be settlement all money between
city, created outside This
settlement this year will in
future year. The matter of settlement process
AS illustration of this be said that the
the of Iron River which had Port Wing
ago. has not yet been finished This settlement
better illustrated than in the explanation made of by Wash
which kened exactly the dissolution partner
ship meneach his share the division
will be between the town and the city.
There comparison of the form of government city
will be vastly superior the old cumbersome
now have of doing things.
having petitions charge have secured
majority all the signatures outside of the plated portion
Their task has been big and if is contemplated taking
oughton the dynamite plant must be done this year
If incorporation should
coming election and attempted future date city
will include only the settled por the village The
will all tell this and tell why it Onethrd the
taxable property and majority Of all the this outlying
territory has been secured another petition
probematca statement but based experiences
and information obtained by the committee The proposed city
limits gives splendid territory the
tory be secured this and with the certainty that it will
be another lands additional why Wash
burn should incorporate
coming year puts the question
up taxpayers large the floating
now and do not to be for
perty holders and residents whether they
poraon The TIMES has presented few the forego
which believe to be sufficient why Washburn should
porate Every voter who will have voice the determination
question should hourough acquan himself with all the
in order that he may vote inteLigently.
The settlers coming around their govern
ment and they entitled have it, Let them build their
let them support their Schools spend
their money for all public improvements If going
encourage immigration treat these right
and don't then they discourage others
settling lands Give them self government
encourage agricultural Development
THE TINES stands aooted for incorporation be-
is the only logical business thing for Washburn
will work upon the prejudice of people suggest
Jail sorts of why and SOL for incorporation
against incorporation Such insnuaons
nothing and not to be classed arguments
proposition which the of Washburn s
interests there nggers the wood piles nothing
be gained unless city governments better than hearted
kind of management like town organization gives considered
better The question that should command thought
and the verdict of ones deoeraon in
corporation not advisable they should cast their accord
with that opinion On the other hand what
needed then let vote to have it, Do not be against the
proposition because else is champong
but stand for incorporation because it the best thing
burn This of ours the largest of the United
States about time awaken egotsm and re
cognize the fact that able govern ourselves as
than would be Ashland Superior Chicago Let us
down the basis of city the the
intend should Then and not until then will Washburn have
government for and in behalf of all the people,
-