The daily morning journal and courier., 1904-11-30
GARNEGIE'S NAME ON
 MRS. GHADWICK'S NOTE
MR. HEWToN'S LAWYER WILL NOT CONTRADICT THE FACT.

tiOn of the Note for s5OO,OOO was Not
 at All Unexpected--Important De-
 velopments in the Case Expected
 Within Few Days-CleveIand Bank
 Compelled to Take Advantage of
 Sixty Days Notice.
 Boston. Nov 29.-Herbert D. Newton of Brookline, the plantiff in the suit against Mrs. Cassie L. Chadwick, refus- ed tonight to discuss the case in any phase, but referred inquirers to his counsel, Percy W. Carver.
 At his home in Newton tonight Mir. Carver told an Associated Press rep resentative that important develop ments in the case of Mrs. Chadwick were expected within few days Re- ferring particularly to the note for s5OO,OOO, said to have been signed with the name of Andrew Carnegie, MT. Car yer said:
 In MT. Newton's bill of complaint which has been filed in the suit against Mrs. Chadwick, MT. Newton alleges that as an inducement for him to loan Mrs Chadwick $1S0,S00 Mrs. Chadwick showed him note for $50000O, which was signed by a man who, Mr. Newton believed, to be fully responsible as one who could stand behind such loan as was requested. I prefer not to state what name was signed to this note, but you can say that we do not contradict the statement that the note bore the signature of Andrew Carnegie
 MT. Carver, who spent the day in this city said that he was in telephonic communication to-day with Lawyer Ryall of New York, who has been handling MT. Newton's case in that city on the subject of the suit He said that the conversation did not develop anything of moment.
 MT. Carver stated, in conclusion, that MT. Carnegie's repudiation of the note for $500,000, was not at all expected.
 Further details of the case were furn- ished the Associated Press representa- tive tonight by one legally identified with the present litigation. By this person it was said that MT. Newton's loan of S109,SOO to Mrs. Chadwick was made purely as business proposition.
 
 MT. Newton's judgment, it will be alleged, was influenced by the certifi- cate of Fri Reynolds, secretary and treasurer of the Wade Park Banking company of Cleveland, that he held se- cunities belonging to Mrs. Chadwick to the value of $50000O0.
 A note for $500, bearing as it's sigma ture the name of Andrew Carnegie was offered as evidence that Mrs. Chad wick's credit was unirnpeachable Mrs. Chadwick, in explanation of the pos session of this note, said that on one of his trip to Scotland, MT. Carnegie carried with him a block of her Gale donian railway stock, which she desir- ed him to dispose of to the best ad- vantage on the other side of the At lantic. In lieu of the receipt for the stock, MT. Carnegie, Mrs. Chadwick ex- plained, gave her his note for $500, OOO." The exact date on which MT. Newton advanced Mrs Chadwick $190,8O0, it was stated, is not known to any one ex- cept the parties directly concerned and their counsel. Payment was not forth coming at the proper time, it is alleged, and Mir. Newton finally instructed his attorneys to take whatever steps they deemed necessary to secure payment.
 On November 12 conference was held in New York between counsel for MT. Newton, counsel for Mrs Chadwick and Mrs. Chadwick herself. On the same date two suits were entered in the New York courts in MT. NeWton's behalf for the purpose of subjecting Mrs. Chadwick to an examination under oath on a supplementary process for the purpose of learning exactly what were the securities she alleges are held in trust by MT. Reynolds.
 The conference between Mrs. Chad wick and the attorneys was an extend- ed one, lasting from half past II o'clock in the forenoon until nearly midnight. It resulted in Mrs. Chadwick signing an assignment of the securities held for her by Mr. Reynolds. Mrs. Chadwick h had informed Mrs. NeWton's counsel, 1t is alleged, that securities in Mr. Key holds custody to the value of $5000, 900 were controlled by another party, whose name she withheld, under a power of attorney, as security for a loan of $300,0O0, which she had nego- tiated, and that as a result she was unable to touch the securities.
 On the following Monday counsel for MT. Newton went to Cleveland, call- ed on MT. Reynolds and asked to see the Chadwick securities. Mr. Reynolds, 1t will be alleged, refused to exhibit the securities which he had received as 1t was understood in sealed packages, and which he had not subsequently, had an opportunity to examine. MT. Reynolds, however, it is claimed, issued a certificate stating of what he had been informed by Mrs. Chadwick, the securities consisted. According to this certificate the securities consisted principally of an immense block of shares in the Caledonian railway, one of the most prosperous railroads in Scotland, some United States Steel corporation gold bonds, and some shares in an American Railroad com pany Mir. Reynolds said at the time that If the attorney would obtain Mrs. Chadwick's consent to inspect the se- curities he would offer no objections. Mrs. Chadwick refused. counsel allege, her consent and up to the present time it Is claimed, the securities have not been seen by either MT. Newton or any of his counsel.
 N- -w } a4t @. Yl lpH~ 8,. -