Ottumwa tri-weekly courier. [volume] (Ottumwa, Iowa) 1903-1916, 1904-03-15

certain real estate in township II north
OF range IL. e. X. Daugherty.
q. A. Wall VS.. u. s. Grant. Petition
TO quiet title to certain land In town
sip u range IA. Seneca Cornell.
Phillip Watkins VS.. Mary johnson Ell
al. Plaintiff asks that title to certain
lands in Wapello county be quieted in
him. Williams and Williams.
w. w. Buchanan VS.. J. B. Bowman
petition at law. Suit for $500 judg
ment against defendant alleged to be
due as com mission on real estate
sales. Work & Work.
Florence A. Davis VS.. Modern Wood
men OF America. Suit to recover
$4,000 alleged to be due on life insur.
ance policy held by the late D. NJ
Sage, father of the plaintiff. Fullen &
Ayres.
E. H. Emery & Co. VS.. Wabash Rail
road Co. A suit for judgment for $50
against the defendant company for al
legged negligence and delay in trans
porting one car of bananas from St.
Louis to Ottumwa. D. H. Emery.
Stodghill and Darden VS.. Chicago
Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. Suit
for $500 damages for alleged negli
gence and delay of the defendant com
pany in transporting six carloads Of
cattle from the state of Kansas to OF.
tumwa. A. w. Enoch.
Henry Darts Sons VS. w. A. High.
smith. Suit for judgment for sum Of
$26S.50 alleged to be due for merchan.
disc purchased by defendant from
plaintiff. L. A. Kelley.
The Enterprise Paint Manufacturing
Co. VS.. G. B. Castle ct al. Suit for
judgm ent for $137.13 for goods and
merchandise purchased by the defend.
ant from the plaintiff. Heindel & Web.
Der.
]. w. Edgerly & Co. VS.. c. B. Castle
ct al Suit for judgment for $349.29
for goods and merchandise purchased
by the defendant from the plaintiff.
Heindel & Weber.
F. A. Blachly VS.. Michael Carr, Mary
A. Carr and Marie Parker. Petitioner
states that by persuasion and assist
ance, financial and otherwise, defend
ants induced Rosa Blachley, wife OF
the plaintiff, to leave her home and
return to Illinois. That in order to in
duce her to return home he was com.
PEELED to sell his tools at great sac
rifice to get the money to pay his fare
to Illinois and by reason of his absence
he lost his position and has been sub,
ject to great mental anguish. He asks
damages in the sum of $4,000. Lowen.
berg & Coen.
G. w. Fails VS.. Tom Gaffney. Suit for
judgment for $166.93 upon a certain
promisory note. j. F. Hall.
Louisa Heckart VS.. Levi Woods.
Suit for $4,000 damages for personal
injuries and sickness alleged to have
resulted from an assault with stick
of wood. Fullen & Ayres.
Margaret Glenn VS.. Mrs. Ella Bur-
ton. Suit for $1,000 damages for al
legged SANDER and libel B. w. Scott.
Globe Tea Company VS.. Duree &
Duree. Suit for judgment, $S34.96, al
legged to be due for goods and mer-
chandise purchased by defendant from
plaintiff. McElroy & McElroy.
international Wall Paper Co. VS.. G.
B. Castle 6, Co.. Suit for judgment for
$172.57 for goods and merchandise said
to have been purchased by defendant
from plaintiff. Work, g. Work.
w. G. Krieger VS.. w. c. Nicherson.
Suit for judgment for $237.94 upon GER
tain promisory notes given by defend
ant to plaintiff. J. A. Lowenberg.
Eddyville VS.. H. G. True. Suit to
compel the defendant to pay Judgment
for $1,000 secured against plaintiff
corporation by F. e. Vance for person
al injuries. jacques & Jacques.
Fred Isaacson vs. Hawkeye Insur-
ance Co. A suit to compel payment
of 5000 alleged to be due on fire in
surance policy. Sumner Siberell.
William knight vs.. Mary r. Lot
spiecn. Suit for Judgment for $1,000
upon contract between plaintiff and
defendant for the purpose Of prospect
ing for coal on lands owned by the
defendant. Lowenberg & Enoch.
G. G. King ct al VS. J. G. Fair. Suit
for Judgment for $425 alleged to be due
as rent upon certain church property
from the use of which petitioners were
prevented by the defendant. Seneca
Cornell.
A. Hartley VS.. G. M. & st. P. rail
way. Suit for judgment for $1,532,S5
alleged to be due for personal injuries
and wages. F. G. Orelup.
Edward Lancey VS.. Frank Venator
Plaintiff sues for $4,000 damages for
injuries sustained by an alleged as.
sault made upon the plaintiff by the
defendant at Chillicothe. Lowenbere
& Cosn.
Modern Skirt Co. VS.. l.. Stein ct al
Suit for judgment for s249 for goods
and merchandise said to have been pur-
chased by the defendant from the
plaintiff Work & Work.
E. D. Lawrence VS.. T. e. Thompson.
Suit for Judgment for $3.50 alleged to
be due plaintiff by failure on part OF
defendant to fulfill his part of a verbal
contract providing for the purchase
of cattle ard feeding same for market.
w. W. Epps.
Penn Oil & Supply Co. VS.. G. B. Cas-
tie. Suit for judgment for $125.20 said
to be due for goods and merchandise
sold by the plaintiff to the defendant.
Seneca Cornell.
J. A. Lowenberg vs.. Jesse B. Bow
man. Suit for Judgment for 5000 for
legal services said to have been rem.
dered defendant by plaintiff. J. A.
Don A. Pool VS.. H. q. Eastman and
Eastman Lumber Co. Suit for judg.
oon+ fo,. e. 900 oIIcood RI he d,,a DIair,.