The Montgomery advertiser., 1904-10-10

banks be suddenly called upon to make good their Inflated liabilities, ana suGt storm will break over the hopupiis a, as has not been known in sn it's nts'oly IS IF. very core. What has been aptiy caliee Hocus Focus money is doing the pis'
 gest business it was ever known to oV |.
 What Is entitled Frenzier. Finance ,s hi holding such a carnival as 1t never neie before. This can not last Ine ,ts,s will surely come, and those wno nys to see 1t will feel as though the WoGsd that MT. Bryan were with me in this this The Second Battle. Togetner "s the have whipped the fight in lSs6, pu. ,as ans Southern Democratic bosses woria hvs sp. drive the allies apart by brutal insults at the very opening of the campaIsn. In 1904, had all the Bryan Democra.s refused to be bound by the indsnond5 i,s snd had MT. Bryan joined force with me, we could have won this contest The tem. per of the people Is ripe for revoi., 1.. anu Is getting. hotter every day; Iney FEY FEY need leaders whom they can trust, The Democratic masses who followed Bryan are sick at heart They listen without conviction when Bryan speaks TOT Tar ker They want want pasn ngnnserss ss n ao f,rhter. I au
 Roosevelt stands in the open, ana dares Parker. defiantly almost mock. ingly; and Parker meekly stays out or the fight In his formal Letter iester np Da tSe S glove thrown at his feet, declaring that he will revoke that pension order, NO. 7S. But in the same breath, he hastens to admit that Roosevelt did preelsehs s done. If elected he. Parker, will at once have Congress do what Roosevelt has already done. Heavens! What meek warrior is this! Roosevelt did the right thing. but not in the right way, and if you will elect me Presi- dent, I will do the same thing in the proper wayi" Did any nominee ever seek the Presidency on that kind or
 When is he going to free those Phil ippines? He does not say. What is he going to do to the trusts? Will ne deal drastically with the Standard oli ambition for the past two years? What will he do to the Sugar Trust which his campaign manager, Gorman. repre- sents in the United States Senate? On the negro question-why has he been silent? Does he condemn Roosevelt for that Booker Washington lunch? Docs he condemn the appointment of negroes to office? Why did he fail to make any reference whatever to that plank in the Republican platform which his running mate. Davis, says created race is- sue?' The solid South is being kicked and cuffed into the support of Parker upon the ground that he differs from Roosevelt on the negro question. Be- fore the South is dragooned into voting for the New Yorker and against tne,r own son, hers in blood and sympathy and deathless devotion-ought not the New Yorker to be compelled to speak out on this question?
 In his formal letter of acceptance, just made public, 1t is curious to note that MT. Parker does not once mention the name of Jefferson, Jackson. or any other great Democrat. He makes no reference to the titular deities of the Democratic party. The man to whom he alludes with the greatest reverence is William Mckinley; and the next is James G. Blaine. He eulogizes the policy of both these statesmen, and finds fault with MT. Roosevelt because he has not followed their illustrious example. Really, MT. Parker's peculiar kind of Democracy amounts to a riddle.
 The most Democratic portion of Judge Parker's letter Is that wherein. he eulogizes the policy of James G. Blaine and William Mckinley upon the subject of reciprocity.
 What Is reciprocity but free trade in those raw materials which the protected manufacturers want? If free trade be