The Hawaiian gazette., 1904-08-02
MRS, KNIGHT TAKES HAND
IN PARKER RANCH CASE
Charges Conspiracy by Sam Parker, J. S. and
e. Low, F. Wundenbers and Masoon & Light.
foot to Defraud Annie 7. X. Parker.

neither she nor her said daughter had
acquired any property rights through
her said first husband
SAM PARKER OPPOSED GUARD
IANSHIP.
Seventh: That petitioners father
was first appointed guardian of Annie
urker; that after his death petitioner
was SO appointed, and later, upon her
request, A. w. Carter was appointed
guardian: that said Samuel Parker
contested the appointment of petition
e,'' father, as such guardian, but with
out success due TO the opposition of
your petitioner 10 the desires and plans
Of SAID Samuel Parker in the premises.
SAM PARKER'S LACK OF INTER
EST IN ANNIE PARKER.
Tenth: That from the death of petit
tiri ers first husband TO date, Samuel
Fark,r has taken no steps himself to
foster or care for the interests of your
petitioners said daughter but that all
steps that have been taken in her be-
hall have been initiated or brought
about by petitioner and those acting
ia the interests of her said daughter
anG exclusive ct said Samuel Parker.
SAM PAREER'S EXTRAVAGANCE
AND INCAPACITY.
Eleventh: That petitioner fr n her
knowledge of said Samuel Parker has
always favored the management and
control of her daughters property
rights by those unconr cted with and
independent of said Samuel Parker, for
petitioner had personal knowledge of
the extravaganza of said Samuel Par
ker and of his inability to manage his
own property affairs in a discreet and
prudent manner Furthermore petit
toner had heard from time to time of
suggestions coming from said Samuel
Parker casting doubt upon the title
of petitioners daughter to the estate
now enjoyed and possessed by her. and
that the foregoing reasons have been
sufficient in petitioners mind to re-
quire her to adopt a policy in the in
terests of her daughter adverse to al
lowing the said Samuel Parker any
control in the Management or direction
of the affairs of her said daughter. al
though petitioner has at the same time
sought to carry out such policy in
way so as to give as little offense as
possible to the said Samuel Parker or
his relatives and friends:
FAITH IN CARTER.
Twelfth: That petitioner asked and
approved the appointment of A. w.
Carter as guardian of her daughters
estate because she believed that the
said A. w. Carter could not and would
not be controlled guided or influenced
by the said Samuel Parker in the dis
charge of his duties, and was otherwise
fit and proper person in all respects
to receive said appointment and to dis
charge said trust, which belief your
petitioner AYERS has been fully justi-
fled by the results of the work and the
conduct of A. w. Carter as such guar
dian:
SAM PARKER'S SUDDEN MOVE.
Thirteenth: That reasonably salts
factory relations, everything consider
ed, have been maintained between pc
titioner and said Samuel Parker until
recently when said Samuel Parker,
without warning and without any prior
complaint to petitioner against said
guardian, notified said guardian that
he had appointed the said Eben p. Low
manager of the Parker Ranch, includ-
ing the shares of petitioners daughter
therein, and that he, the said Samuel
Parker. claimed the right to the eXclu-
sive possession and management there
of as surviving partner of a partner
ship alleged to have existed between
him the said Samuel Parker, and John
p. Parker the second aforesaid. petit
IL
at Waimea aforesaid and simultaneous
ly with the arrival of said Eben p. Low
upon the Ranch with authority to take
immediate possession thereof, as the
manager, under said Samuel Parker,
and within twenty-four hours thereaf-
ter petitioner also received notice that
the said j. S. Low, brother of said
Eben p. Low, had instituted a suit
before this Court for the removal of
A. w. Carter as guardian of the estate
OF her said daughter:
NO PREVIOUS CHARGES AGAINST
CARTER.
Fourteenth: And this petitioner fur
Their says that at no time prior to the
institution of said last named suit. or
for that matter since, had she received
any information whatsoever from the
said j. S. Low or from any member of
the Parker family that said A. w. Car
ter had in any way mLsconducted him
self as guardian or otherwise shown
himself to be unfit to hold and eXer-
else that trust, nor had said applica-
ton been prefaced by any suggestion
to petitioner by said j. $. Low or any
other relation or friend of said Samuel
Parker that petitioner was acting
against the interests of her daughter
In reposing confidence In said guardian!
No INTIMACY WITH THE LOWS.
Fifteenth And further continuing
your petitioner says that no such inti-
mate or friendly relations existed be-
tween j, :, Low ana petitioners frst
husband ~ represented by said ! ;
Low Ia his petition Tor the remnvnl
~ said guardian. ana alleges the ruth
IN be- that petitioners hrsl husband
lhoroushlY ilsirgsled said J > Low
ana alsn his brother the said y a.
low aHh Frequently sai1 40 petitioner
lhai he bad he psr fqF filhrr VI lhsm