River Falls journal. [volume] (River Falls, Pierce County, Wis.) 1872-2019, 1904-10-06
ALL NOW PRAISE HIM
PANANAIANS COMMEND WISDOM
OF PRESIDENT ROOSEVELT.
Democratic Charge that the Chief Ex-
ecutive Was Hasty, Refuted by Re-
cent Developments in the Isthmia ian

ecutive Was Hasty, Refuted by Re-
cent Developments in the Isthm ian
Republic-His Election Desired.
THERE is NO BETTER ARGU-
| MENT IN REPUTATION OF THE
| DEMOCRATIC ALLEGATION THAT
PRESIDENT ROOSEVELT is HAS
TY AND INCONSIDERATE IN HIS
| ACTIONS THAN THE ACTUAL De
VELOPMENT OF EVENTS IN THE
| REPUBLIC OF PANAMA. A few
weeks ago, and even recently, many of
| the leading Democratic newspapers in
| the United States have asserted that
! Panama was demonstrating against the
administration of the canal zone as or
dered by the President, and that an i'm
| perialistic policy was being pursued by
him in his treatment of the Panamaians.
| The Democratic critics took advantage Of
a state of local unrest in Panama and
| protest on its part against the inter
| probation of the treaty at the hands of
the canal commission as an evidence that
| the President was treating the Panama
| ians with autocratic sway.
What are the facts? 1t seems that
June last to Gen Davis. as Governor of
! the zone, to organize the strip controlled
| by the United States, the President en-
deavored in every way to act in strict
accordance with the wording Of the
treaty, and for the best interests Of
| Panama as well as the zone. 1t happen
ed, however, that a CERTAIN GROUP
| OF POLITICIANS IN PANAMA
WHO HELD NO OFFICES, AND
WHO ARE THE OUTS LIKE THE
DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN THE
UNITED STATES, WERE LOOKING
FOR ANY OPPORTUNITYTOM MAKE
TROUBLE. Without consulting care
fully the treaty, they Immediately made
severe attack on the United States gov
eminent and the President, proclaiming
in manifestos and in their newspapers
that the Presidents orders to Governor
Davis were against the spirit and letter
of the treaty, and that he was disregard
ing fagrantly the rights and interests of
Panama, thus crushing out it's indepen-
dence! They agitated their position So Wig
orously that they not only aroused con-
siderable element of the Panama popula-
ton, BUT PROVIDED THE BACK
GROUND FOR SENSATIONAL
VIEW SIOIC1EC LIZ
SENT TO THE UNITED STATES.
No Cause for the FURRY.
AT the moment when the situation was
somewhat critical in Panama, the new
American minister, John Barrett, arriv-
ed on the scene with special instructions
from the President to demonstrate to
the Panama government and people that
the President was determined that NO
STEPS SHOULD BE TAKEN, IN
VOLVING THE RELATIONS OF
PANAMA PROPER AND THE
CANAL ZONE, WHICH WE'RE NOT
CONSISTENT WITH THE TREATY
AND WITH THE TRUE INTER
ESTS OF BOTH PANAMA AND
THE UNITED STATES. After the
minister had Gained the excitement to
great extent by his assurances of fair
dealing and after he had given the Pan
amaians abundant opportunity to file
with him all the complaints they had in
mind, he showed them, in a respectful
but diplomatic way, that THE VERY
POINTS ON WHICH THEY so Sc
VERELY CRITICISED PRESIDENT
ROOSEVELT HAD ALREADY,
BACK IN JANUARY OF THIS
YEAR, BEEN EXPLICITLY Elk
planned BY THEIR OWN ENVOY
ENIPOTENTIARY, MIR. BUNAU-.
VARILLA, IN HIS STATEMENT TO
| SECRETARY HAY OF HIS INTER
PROBATION OF THE TREATY. In
other words, the minister proved TO the
Panama government and people that
their own representative, Mr.. Bunau-
Varilla, many months before, had, on
their behalf, given the United States abb
solute control of the two ports at the
respective entrances of the canal, THUS
COMPLETELY DISARMING THE
CONVENTIONS OF THE. CRITICS
OF THE PRESIDENT that in es-
tablshing these ports by his orders to
Governor Davis, he had disregarded the
sovereignty and rights of the Panama
government. In addition to this, the
minister also explained to them that in
view of the great responsibility which
the United States owed to the rest of
the world in constructing such a gigantic
waterway, there could be no possible di-
vision of authority, and that the United
States had already, by liberal gift of
ten million dollars, paid for those very
sovereign rights which they now ques-
toned. If they had not agreed to this
arrangement, they might never have got
the canal, and they would probably have
lost their independence.
President Was Right.
What now is the result? In COMPARE
son with the situation a few weeks ago
when the editorials in the local news
papers, the discussions in the public
plazas, and the kilograms to the Demo
cratic papers in the United States, all
criticised the President and said that
he was acting arbitrarily, WE NOW
SEE THE LEADING MEN, NOT
ONLY OF THE GOVERNMENT
PARTY BUT OF THE OPPOSITION.
ACKNOWLEDGING THAT THE
PRESIDENT is RIGHT; we hear peo-
pie in the plazas and public meetings
commencing the United States: we note