Arizona republican., 1904-07-01

of the cattle been ir possession He was ordered to make an accounting and judgment of more than SiO,OO0 was rendered against him. The prir- cipal point decided by the United States supreme court was that Ward was not holding the ranch as an agent and that he should not have been com pelled to make an accounting to the defendants and on that ground the judgment of the lower court was re- versed, the case being practically and forever decided in favor of the plain tiff. The opinion of the supren.e court was silent as to the original conten- tion. Judgment was entered in the dis trict court, the mao1te having been re- ceived, for the plaintiff. A day or two later there was another Judgment for Ward for the amount he had originally sued for with interest from 1891. It is from this Judgment appeal is taken.
 In the case of the Arizona Democrat { Publishing company against Sam Webb, jr., and others judgment was given the defendants an1 a stay of execution for sixty days was O. dered
 This is one of the actions growing out of the Arizona Democrat troubles. Webb had been given judgment against the paper and the judgment had been assigned to his attorneys. Before the payment of the judgment the sureties for the publishing company w. T. Smith and Eugene Brady O'Neill
 were garnisheed in an action brought against Webb by w. C. Dawes. The Dawes claim was eventually settled by
 the sureties and the sheriff made re- turn of the rest of the original judg- ment and showing of the satisfaction
 of the Dawes judgII.e The decision
 of yesterday holds that return should have been made Of the whole amount.
 In the case of T. N. Clanton and
 others gainst James R. Thorpe, the
 plaintiffs were given judgment and a
 stay of execution until October 1 was allowed. This suit had been brought to
 prevent the defendant from closing up
 certain streets and alleys of the town
 site of Sidney in the Buckeye country. That townsite had been generously en-
 dowed with thoroughfares and failed
 to build up to them. A considerable
 part of tine townsite vas bought up by the defendant and reverted into an
 agricultural district. It was the the
 ory of the plaintiffs that the streets
 and alleys once having been dedicated
 could not be sold cut of existence.
 In the case of E. w. Lewis, supreme court reporter, against w. F. Nichols, acting governor, and others, a per ! emptory writ was ordered to issue. The plaintiff had performed the duties for
 which he was employed and had pro cured the printing of certain volumes of the Arizona reports. Payment WAS
 refused him on the ground that no ! funds had been set aside by the legis- ! lature for that purpose. MT. Lewis de i manded that he be paid out of sIch
 other funds as might be available and
 asked for writ to that effect.
 | Other cases disposed of were: G. J. [ Ridenour against W. A. Colwell, judg-
 ment for the defendant; G. w. Nichols against ". s, Appleby and others, i Judgment for the plaintiff on the de- ! fendant's cross complaint and fadg- l ment for the defendant on the com | plaint of the plaintiff neither party to
 receive costs; D. A. Tyrrell against 1 the Farmers and Merchants bank of 1 Tempe and others, dismissing the com | plaint and quieting tile of Goodwin
 Bros. to twenty acres of the property ! involved and the title of w. J. Kings | bury to twenty-four acres.
 In the case of Elizabeth C.. Brown i against the Valley bank, a molten for a new trial was denied and notice of appeal was given. In the suit of Clara 1 s. Sanders against the Phoenix Street | Railway company, it was ordered that | the word executrix should be changed l to administratriX wherever it appears. l A divorce was granted Frank Tucker , from Mary Tucker.