The Teton peak. [volume] (St. Anthony, Idaho) 1899-1904, 1904-11-03

sus that the w~orkingman does not buy
his food at wholesale. 1t is, therefore,
clearly wrong to compare the working
mans wages with Wholesale prices. The
Democratic Text Book ~learnedly dis
courses on the stability of wholesale
prices, while as a matter of fact, it is
recognised by all authorities on prices
that wholesale prices are exceedingly
sensitive and that retail prices are more
stable, never reaching relatively as high
Or as low levels as the former. But,
leaving aside the question of stability, it
Il the retail price which the ordinary
consumer is compelled to pay. and which.
therefore, discloses the more accurately
che cost of living. Further. it is stated
In this Bulletin of the Bureau of Labor
that these retail prices were secured
directly from the books of sales of over
300 retail merchants-that these prices
represent actual sales to consumers eX-
tending over each month of the fourteen
year period covered-that they represent
every important center of industry in the
country-and that the stores contribut-
ing the data are such rs are largely
patronized by the working classes. 1t is
understood that these prices will be pub
Lshed in the greatest detail for each city
covered in the Eighteenth Annual Re-
port of the Bureau, now in press-an
evidence that the officials of the bureau
have no doubt as to the integrity of their
data.
As the final court, the Democratic
managers suggest that the whole mat
ter of cost of living be left to the house
wives of the country. They do not per
n no rarol1 fhn Stntap,Apt r,nAc in tho
criticised Bulletin that over $4,000 fam
lilies contributed to the report-that the
bureau has practically done already what
Is suggested-left the matter to the
wives of over %, representative work
ingmen.
Full OF Misstatements.
The criticism of the wage data ap-
pears to be quite as futile as that of the
figures for cost of living. 1t is full
of Measurements of fact. as may be seen
by reference to the Bulletin itself. The
method of averaging imputed to the
bureau was not used. Even the most
cursory examination of the Bulletin
could not fail to disclose the falsity of
the premises upon which the entire criti-
cism as to method is based. 1t has been
charged in some quarters that the in
crease Of 1873 per cent. in wages shown
BY the bureau is greater thar is actually
the case. because the wages which form
the basis of the report represent highly
u~nionized c~enters. where wages have
been increased most rapidly. This charge
IL readily refuted by comparing the Bull
letin wages with the average of the mini
mum union wage shown for the same
occupations, as compiled by the Secre-
tary of the Building Contractors Coun-
Gil Of Chicago. ILL.,, and published by the
Building Employers Association of New
York City. Bearing in mind that the
union wages quoted are minimum wages
and that the actual union wages would
average considerably higher, the com
parisons in u few occupations are as fol-
lows: Minimum union wages of masons
n 70 critics average "a cents per hour,
while the average of the bureau is not
quite 45 cents: minimum union wages
Of bricklayers in 20 cities average 57A
cents per hour, while the average of
the bureau is 54A cents; minimum
union wages of structural iron workers
In 25 cities average 46A cents per hour,
while the average of the bureau is less
chan an cents; minimum union wages
Of plumbe in % cities average 474
cents Per hour, while the average of the
bureau is 43A cents. These examples
might be multiplied, but those given are
sufacient to show that the averages of
che bureau are considerably lower than
che average Of minimum union wages,
and are, therefore, fairly representative
of both union and non-union labor in the
occupations covered. The charge that
An unjustifiable increase in wages is
secured by the bureau by the collection
Of Its figures from strongly unionized
centsrs is readily refuted by the above
facts.
The principal charges have been men
uoned-the minor ones are equally I'M
warranted and unsupported by the facts.
The report of the bureau represents the
sum of a patient and painstaking ~investi-
CATION of nearly three years, and its per
manent value canno be l~essened or OBJ
secured by partisan attacks. Its value
as a scientific study of economic condi-
tlonS and as a contribution to the some
wi meagre statistics of wages and cost
OF living has already been recognized
Doth at home and abroad. The accuracy
and excellence of the reports of this
bureau of the government haye never
been seriously questioned during its eigh-
teen years of existence. Under the able
and conservative management of Com
missioner Wright, it has always merit
% Its reputation of being a non-parti-
san office for the collection and presen-
cation of facts, and so far as can be
seen from a careful examination of its
satest report, the charges made for par
usan effect will not warrant the with
erawal of the confidence of the public.
Olney and Cleveland's Monumental
Brass.
The Democratic donkey is trying to
dance into power over the graves of
United States soldiers who died for the