Gloucester County Democrat. (Woodbury, N.J.) 1878-1932, 1904-05-26
MAY TERM Of GLOl-
CESTER CO. COURTS.
Jnstice Garrison, Being Elsewhere
Circuit and Judge Endicott
and Law Judge Jes-
sup Presiding.

Snpreme and Circuit Court lists, while
containing the usual number Of causes, the
number ready for immediate trial was
below the average, only two cases being in
that state of preparedness. Those were -
Millville improvement Company vs.. Benz.
F. Porch. Counsel, A. H. Swackhamer.
Watkins & Avis. Also the case Of the
Borough of Clayton VS.. Harmon R. Sparks.
J.J. SummerilI. Watkins & Avis.
The other cases listed in the Circuit are:
Job Scott VS.. Frank B. AnnadowR.
Margaret B. Ramsey vs. Franklin D.
Springer, Sheriff.
Christiana Clark vs. Hattie. Craft. Dis
continuance ordered.
Kate Warwick vs. Mary R. Wescott.
c. A. Bozorth vs. McClosky & Thomp-
son. Two cases.
Willis NJ. Hand VS.. John P. Whitney.
Wilmer T. Craig vs.. Joseph Taylor.
Argument on demurrer at Chambers.
Howard W. Muller vs.. W. D. Gill and
Il. c. England.
Joseph T. Wood vs.. Susanna Elliott.
This case was reported settled.
Binder VS.. A. F. CleaFer.
Helen ]. Thompson vs.. Atlantic City
R.R. Co.
Fuller Buggy Co. vs.. VIM. c. Fox.
VIM. H. Pounds vs.. W. J. & seashore
R. R. Co.
Under the peremptory call all went of
for the term except those noted.
THE SUPREME COURT ISSUES.
hc-entire Supreme Court list went of
for the term. The causes listed are:
August Rennebaum Us. Atlantic City
R.R.
Thos. Martindale vs.. Ida Kirkbride, 2
cases; both referred to the Circuit for trial
Seth Roberts VS.. Geo. c. Laws.
E. G. Miller VS.. John Rambo, referred
to the Circuit.
sallie R. Smith VS.. Atlantic City R. R.
Geo. G. Green vs.. Pennsylvania Fire In
surance Co., also the same plaintiff vs. The
American Fire Insurance Co.
Stille c. and Milton L. Chew vs.. james
Mott.
samns. weaner vs. G. G. Green
Chas. E. Grange vs. swedesboro Glass
Works. Ohio Valley Clay Co., against the
same defendants - cases.
John Bates vs. Camden, Gloucester and
Woodbury. R. R. Co.
VIM. B. Helms vs.. Swedesboro Glass
Works. Also A. Fredericks with the same
defendants
Mary A. Lupton vs.. Camden, Gloucester
and Woodbury. Railway Co.
Robt ]. Wilson vs.. Dietrich & Bowser;
also Chas. Wilson and James Horner VS..
the same defendants.
Judge Edincott stated to the attorneys
present that evidently there were no cases
ready for trial on the opening day. He
had set apart this week to this county and
if counsel will get together to have cases
tried this week he win stay 1t was then
that trial OF the two Circuit cases noted
aboye were arranged.
A case of considerable interest not in the
printed list of causes in the Circuit Court
was added for argument on motion Of Mr..
SummerilI. The plaintiff is Albert Sparks,
Receiver of The Fidelity Mutual Fire In
surance Company against Job Scott.
The question involved is whether Fire
Insurance Company doing business on the
mutual plan, incorporated under the laws
Of another State, can maintain an action
against a citizen of this State for an assess
ment on a policy of insurance on property
in this State where the policy was actually
issued at the Office of the Company without
complying with the laws of this State.
Pierce & Stockwell, Of Camden, appeared
for the Receiver, and Joseph J. summerill
for Mr.. Scott. The argument was held
before the noon recess on Tuesday, and
Judge Endicott took the case under adj
yisement
THE GRAND JURY.
Immediately after the formal opening Of
the various courts, the following named
good and true men we're called and quail
fed as Grand Jurors.
Mantua Thos. c. Dix, foreman.
South Harrison DR.. S. F. Stanger.
Franklin-M Matthias F. Crane.
Logan-John S. Truitt.
Glassboro- Lewis S. Stanger.
Woodbury. Joseph n Coombs.
Wenonah- John Colbert.
Harrison James N. Wolf.
West DepsfOrd Chas r Barker.