The Minneapolis journal. [volume] (Minneapolis, Minn.) 1888-1939, 1904-09-19

Sasn SAFE Tor $500, paid Dec. Il, 1903. There
sers q by the public
s maae t OF 4o4oooo feet In section IL in the
! Section SO, Township 81, Range IL Lafayette
that this was burned over few years ago and
nearly all timber destroyed. He does not re-
land, except some ties and spruce wood, which
was was sofa to John H. Ladin in 1901 The estl-
fssh pbs bren Wss
erroneous ens as Mr. o'Brien some time after pnr
that there Was no pne there and
quested a, refundment Of his money, which was
not e complied with. The new cutting referred
means timber never was cut into.
Sectloh ~. Township So, Range 13-This was
IN dvanee moasv Sos fe IS nss
was cut during season, 10000. No accurate
scale has yet been received and the matter
cash sales for. $500 made at the same time
referred ref ta to by the public examiner for tim
Section IT, Township 43. Range 16-This Sec
a lion t., was burned at the time of the Hinckey
Section 10, Township Al, Range 17-This was
sold IN 1880 on an estimate of 100000 feet and
ers and paid for The saies Of $50 and
reported not cut probably because no timber
a few scattering trees left.
S ssstHn Sc - gange sec
ting By SS after
$li5o:ss Was paid into the state treasury Tie
sold for $40 in December, 1900. 1t was there
fore not remarkable that the cruiser IN 1900 re-
Section SO, Township At, Range 1.-THE permit
on this section was in force at the time it was
be worth $3.50 per thousand When examined in
November, 1895, and only sold for $1.75 per
thousand, did not render the permit invalid Or
prevent pre- e1 1t from being cut or sufficient cause
that i was sold for less than it was worth r
In 1890 and expired 1892, three years before Mr..
Dunn became state auditor, and he proceeded
tS sell IT. the timber t new estimate Of so99
state realized Suisse 60 more for the timber
ton, $1s.5sseo 0'AA amount PAID Oh 'N'S Sec
Section So, Township 49, Range 1s-This sec;
| on an estimate of 2,125 900 feet. No cut was
made mad under this permit. It was re-examined in
ported cut and paid for under the last sale;
| under last sale. $6,756.40.
I Section 1G, Township 40, Range 19-This sec.
non s9GsI and ID
reported cut t. BY surveyor general for which the
@ has fae been PAID n 80
because no timber was left, having all been cut
Section So, Township 40, Range 2o-This was
sold in 1888 on estimate Of 1:2oo 900 and
feet epored cut for which
sals e. SID again in 1872 i On ' al estin@te q
October, 1897, Cruiser Dedon reports this section
cut clean some years ago and was burned II
It was cut and pq burned many Years before
! Mr.. Dunn became state auditor. SO that 1t wa'
pq g. Range
1851 on an estimate Of 1900 feet at 81 pc
thousand No cutting reported nor 900 was an,
sold again on an estimate Of 1906 feet a
$3.50 per thonsand and 21s, 25o feet reporteY;
mesn h hs be et on sScnns ana
been cut around this section.
Section A. Township g Rongs 22 =
t6o thou No cutting reported under this sale
Sold again in 1898 on an estimate nate Of 10000
and pd dr any a en feet
years before the examination. reported had bee
outlawed two years and was therefore uncol
Section 20; Township co. Range 22nstat
only has title te the northwest quarter ter,
ade his III e estmae Of $4,000 fee
It covered in addition to the above tract sey We
since nee lost title under contest The tract wa
ESTIMATED BY Dedon in 1900 at 1926, 900 fee
Whch s0s feet has sF repered
seven forty-acre tracts included in Mcclellan
estimate are not included in this permit.
sset on ae estimate Of NJ
n afs d es oo aad
ffS this s ae
seeaon se Range peg
1871 estimate of 100000 feet at ST. so pc
Re.sstinated in 1902 at 200; 900 teet ana sol
1908 at s. per thousand No cut ti has 4arg "
It fe may yG be 20 observed that the timber sold
u $3.50 more per thousand in 1903 than, it did /
to BY the np pu6e EXAMINER has BEEN
explained, means that the timber never was CT
cu ssHon re ss ~as in Her
this secon Trnea boTer an
, section ever contained 100000, fet estimated
1890 as this se.tion was chiefly valuable
Section 1e, Township 50, Range 2s-There
273. no feet was reported. But at the tin
million feet cut, it had been cut by three diffe
Lent parties, of which the last cutting reporte
n ans ops ss at the ms
impossible, to T rescale or It TRACE I'D: o,
1854. when Dedon was employed 5y the pine Lar
Investigation committee. he reported that 500 OF
Tsla c fsss s1s4vsnr I9s a
| | all hardwood. No pine left. He did not succee
he to f Of
(see Dedon's report, land examiners report N
: - section ssfS o. s, Township 49, Range 24-sold
1898. Dedon does not report ''old cuttings {
this section but reports land bnpn ed over al
Ecollected, for in 1896. Only forty acres of sta
, Section So, township 49, Range @--can fir
no report from Dedon, as claimed by publ
81 u9 aae da fes Of Oct Il 1884, for
eStimste fer $4,000 feet on this section is r
I corded. But field report is found fro
which this record should be copy, it is evide1
that 1t Is an error In description in record boo
= East half Of this section was sold on an est
s Ssts Of 10000 feet at cash sale in 1895 +
Section SO, Township IS, Range 24-sold
1893 Dedon does not report April 1900 the
Z AS this is also reported good farming land NJ
. . open the chances are there never was mut
J. timber on t. However $500 feet have BET
Section i, township So, Range 20, 24-Dedon T
that the timber on adjoining ' land ies was Gu
n This was sold in 1891. There was no .dou
/ some cutting done on this section not reporte
a man named Maturen but could And no proc
e Section 1S, Tewnship 81. Range. 25-This W
q does not say when: Surveyor general repor
q 5o713o feet cut, which has been paid. Wheth
o there was any amount Of timber left in IS
e mated and sold for $3.50, which has been pal
shortage of or any shortare o
It inal estimate was 625,OOO feet. of which col, o
e feet has been reported and paid for:
e mate was not $4,000 as the public exanin
: says. but $4,000. This amount was cut
bT Mr. Dunn IN II Of
n the trespass on this section was q mart.