davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Montgomery tribune. (Montgomery City, Mo.) 1892-1910, 1904-11-04

II further charge tina, In remaining
silent n this time he placed IN odiurn
upon his fellow Democrats In that they
we're ehsrued with failing to supper,
him In his Doodle crusade. and tina,
they had nominated a ticket which was
inirieal 10 the hes, interests o. that
crusade. Mr.. Folk knew that this
statement was false, so that his sill.
.nee. 10 my mind. vas a species OF pol.
itleal dishonesty fer which he cannot
be excused.
"wc 'hourht That somewhere In his
speech. AZ 81. Joseph. Mr. FOik might
concoio that there might be an honest
difference Of opinion among Democrats
~ - the prnrrleiv ~ selecting him A.
tho standari.hpnror ~ tho - mGcr1'ic
marty. on the contrary. the Folk cam.
nlinu ~ misroprcscniation and VIM.
ncation cuntinuos-no man ran De
honest and oppose Mr Folk
"Mr. Folks camnairn manager.
would divide the Democratic PARTY To-.
IN two classcH According 20 them. ail
honest men arc Tor Mr. Folk md an
the roguos AGAINST him 80 wonder
then that Mr. Folk demands that
noodle shall bo the campaign Issue
We would place tho hoodltrs 0u one
side. and all those who Oppose hoodlo
on hls side n Mr.. Folk could have
Ms way about this matter there would
BE- no opposition 20 hlm 20 speak ~ in
Tho state 81 Missouri Certainly n
this we're the issue Ne would have %
solid d~ologa'ion from St Louis.
~ Mr.. Folk ls the only homes, man
In Missouri. we ought 10 tlee; him
Governor. Bot 10 hef No n familiar
with THE local political situatlon would
have the ,emerity TO deny tina, a grea,
many Of hls supporters have never
been conspicuous In reform move.
ments: In fact. many have been dis.
credited BY their party In pas, years.
but Mr.. Mcleod probably has cor.
vlne.d them that u Is the only proper
position TO take at the present time.
look around yuu says Mr. Nc
f.cod. in your own county and soc
tho ciTss Of fellows opposing Nj fult.
and draw your own conclusions We
arc reversing the proposition In s..
Louis. and looking around uF. and Soc.
Ing tho Mind Of fellows who are sup
porting him.
~ anything ! have said regarding
The Montgomery tribune. (Montgomery City, Mo.) 1892-1910, 1904-11-04
address
hy
Hon HARRY n HALVES
Delivered NJ
HANNtUii. no
MAILING UP THE BALLOTS.

1901 There Il no question nhou, Mr..
Folks Democracy or hts straight party
record NJ to and including the cam.
palFn ~ 1900. I believed him 10 be n
consistent Democrat. and had no a.
son ~ change my mind until after his
election
since the cainpalru ~ 1900. how.
over his course towards his party has
been such that ! can no longer sup.
mort him IN his political aspirations
I do MOI, think that no Is a good Demo
crst Hls actions since that iino show
that he II not n good Democrat. he.
cause no refused 20 come 10 tho as.
~sls'ance of his party when Il called
upon him. because he Is too closely
affiliated AZ tho present time with Re.
puhllcans. because no has gathered
around him today IN political support
n conglomcration of political assets
which Is absolutely %repuFnant N
party men.
I'VE must Judge mon hy their nas,
acts aud nrevl0n. performances. While
IL II true that Mr. Folk was appointed
immigration commissioner Of the State
Of Missouri by Governor stephens. he
was not in that position cons nlcuously
before the public eye and what he iii
or failol 70 10 In tho capacity ~ I'm.
migration commissioner dii not ma.
~tcrially Interest tho public: hut A.
circuit attorney. In disclosing tho cor.
ruptlon which existed In the City Of
81 Louis. no became the cpntor upon
which all ewes were rlvetcd The cal.
cinm light Of public opinion MAS
thrown upon him Eastern magazine
writer's came 20 81 Louis. dincd with
Mr.. Folk. visited him ~ HIS homo. and
returning, wrote descriptions OF the
corruption Of the City Of 81. Louis,
the weakness ~ It's administration. and
painted Mr. Folk ne tho one ln%corrupti-
bic and honest official who. standing
alone. was dctying no, only the forces
Of corruption himself but was doing
n without the sympathy Of tho com.
munliy or the support " our people.
MIR. Folk knows them 10 be false.
and yet he has not taken the time
form his Official duties. ana from his
daily engapemer ts with the press. 20
correct this impression. hurtful as he
knew II 10 be. net only 10 his city. but
10 all Of his brother Democratic on.
eIsis. and Injurious to the party which
took him frem comparative ebseuritv.
and placed him In the office which he
now occupies.
SIS II because Mr.. Folk has acted In
this way towards his brother Demo.
cratic official and the Democratic party
generally. that he Is now receiving bile
reward In the support NJ Repuhlican
papers and %politicians7 or, Is II hc'
canse. In 1909. with the State and city
campaign In progress. he refused 10
support his perty nomlnees In public
speech or public statement
let us go back a little. In the fall
OF 1900 a number Of Democrats who
were anxious 20 nominate men ~ IN.
usual integrity and standing In tho
community. 50 that q ~clear-cut Issue
OF good government might he made In
the city. mot togethor and discussed
tho merits of different men. agreeing
to support the best men that they
could Ind for nomination. was one
Of those present.
The Montgomery tribune. (Montgomery City, Mo.) 1892-1910, 1904-11-04
WENT BACK ON HIS PROMISE.

AFTER this statement Of Mr. Folk.
tho Star was consrlcuousiy qulot for
'omc time and Ne all waited anxious.
y for Mr.. Folk 10 issue his s,aicmon,
NJ ~ mako a srccrh Hc returned
from Jefferson City and refused ~ 90
either Then again the Star com.
mcncoi iiH editorials Of call joseph
W Folk" or why does not Folk
speak, or m Fob Supports the Dem.
ocrn,lc ticket We viii then know II IL
worthy OF support" and other iiic oil.
torlals The campaign closed. tho
election was held. and Mr. Folk had
not spoken for tho Democratic ticket
But In spite ~ Mr.. Folk and tho Re.
publican press the ticket was elected
by m incronsci majority.
practically tho same thing occurred
In the srrlnr Of this year. when the
Democrats elected a Council ticio,
Nr. Folk was written 20 AMI asked 10
speak. and he was solicited hv per.
snnal request to mako speeches for
III" party. and no arnln refused. AMI
agaln his refusal became a campaign.
issue In the city.
9Th. only reason that has ever been
obtained for Mr.. Folks failure 10 sun.
mort the Democratic State and CITY
ticket was that his support Of tho
'ickot would lose him personally tho
support ~ the Republican papers In 81.
Louis.
This taclt trade by which he failed
10 support his party In consideration
ot the Republican papers supporting
him, was. In my opinion. an act Of
barter In which he sold his PARTY loyni.
~ In return for Republican newspaper
adulaiion
II Is now being claimed by some Of
Mr.. Folks friends that his rofusnl TO
support his party nominees was no
worse a political crime than IN. sun.
mort Of Rolla Wells for mayor who
had t1lc" failed To support the Nation.
Al Democratic Ticket Il seems 10 mo
That The two cases are not parallel IN
the first place, Mr.. Wells had no, been
a beneficiary 81 the party. Hr. Folk
was. In the second place. Mr.. wells's
refusal 10 support the Democratic
rarty was net a campaign issue. Mr..
Folks was. In the third place. whom
The Montgomery tribune. (Montgomery City, Mo.) 1892-1910, 1904-11-04

Mr.. Wells did or did net support did
not make a great deaf Of difference.
~ he did net hold oNeiai position. WAS
not prominent In the public eye. and
WAS under no deb, Of gratitude 10 the
Democratic par'y. In the fourth place.
Will. Mr.. Wells did not vote for his
party Nominees. he did not do so he.
cause Of . difference. In principle. In
the case Of Mr.. Felix there was no
difference In principle. u WIS simply
a question with him as 10 the effect
u would have upon him In securing
united Republican newspaper support.
Mr.. Folks attitude was wroro. no, be.
. principle was involved. but be.
M Mr.. Folks ewn personal ,eif.
interest was involved. No man can
draw an analogy between the two pasi.
lions. and In any ease Mr.. Wells IL not
seeking the nomination fer eeverner.
and Mr.. Folk is.
"Mr. Folk could NOT claim 'ha' no
IA not sunnort tho Democratic tlckot
because ~ the character Of their can.
ili1tcs. A. the Democratic candidates
were conspicuously better men IN
every sense Of tho word than their
" NNANNN w NVNNINfI'N iN1s EXAMINE
that they were not. for tho sake Of
argument, why did mr.. Folk In previ.
Gus Campaigns, when the Democratic
party had sunk 10 \ lew ebb In It's
organization, and It's party nominees
were not In any way equal 10 those In
this election support them eheerfuliy7
Ard. In fact, Why did he always up 10
the time o. his WI election suppor,
any. all kinds and every description Of
, candidate that mich, be placed on
his ticket. ard then after his election
10 otfee draw fine distiretiorsf
II do NOT know IN tho whole City 81
-. Louis or the State Of Missouri one
single Democrat who has assisted his
party In the past In any material way
who IA not condemn IN tho most hli.
Ter lanruTge this betrayal Of his party
II Wa . fruitful topic ~ conversation
On Tho streets Of 81 ionls. ami ihcrs
were n great mrny Democrats who h,.
Ncyei NJ that time that II meant that
Mr. Folk would seek the nomination
for Governor a. Tho hands ~ the Re.
publican rar'v. or ihl' be would b..
como an lnle?ondon, candidate They
The Montgomery tribune. (Montgomery City, Mo.) 1892-1910, 1904-11-04

IN placing the rocorii Joseph W.
Folk. Democratic candite for COVER
nor. before the peopltef Missouri.
Republican leaders sna iliors have
Invariably quoted from rnocratic au.
thorlilos In support Of ? contention
that Folk Is not the slnre rcformsr
he prctonis 20 be and at be IL the
pcrsuuincailon ~ hypoty and de-
ceit AZ a FINAL cnn,ririon TO this
department Of political hfnry We sub
nit IN estimate ~ Foley tho lead.
Ing young Democrat Of . Louis. Mr..
Harry u Hawes Thiiestimatc IL
contained In q public sprh delivered
by Mr. Hawcs AZ Hlnnai. Mo, on
November rs. 1907. ut time when
VIZ Hawoa was q caniite for the
Democratic nomination n governor.
u was charged by Mr. hIk. at that
timo, that Mr. HAYES W the candl.
date ~ the Democratic ate machine
aud his methods IN serung delegates
A. the Democratic prlmas,s were biz.
terry denounced by Mr. hik's friends
Subsequently. however v Folk made
an alliance with Mr llAss AND MIR
HAWES rs TONY TtiFpHRsoNAI
REPRESENTATIVE or MR.. FOLK
IN THE Man ,GEMEv OF THE
DEMOCRAT CANpAiCf IN THE
CITY OF ST LOUIS ND STATE
OF MISSOURI.
Mr Folk and Mr. Haze are speak.
Ing from the same pl1'irm and Mr..
Hawos r. aivocatinr me election OF
Mr., Folk.
Tho following is taken from the ST
Louis Republic. tDcm):
Republic Special
Liberty. Mo. oci tS-Harry n
~ ST. Louis aiirsssed n large
audience In the CLAY County Court.
house this afternoon Wp a intro.
duccd hy Mayor r = Wo-neii
"Nr. HAYES. NJ tho h,s nuing ~ his
speech. and In addrna 'ar fellow. Dem.
referred 10 Joseph W. Folk as
The Montgomery tribune. (Montgomery City, Mo.) 1892-1910, 1904-11-04
POLITICAL DISHONESTY.

Mr.. Folk. his nomination, his election
or his refusal TO support the osmo
cratic ticket. Is incorrect, ! Want Mr..
Folk 10 personally eotree. the state.
ment. ask that he do SO without
evasion. and IN at his reply be not made
by Tony steuver. John 0. o'fie-r,, n.
w. Mcleod. or nob Kern.
u recognize the fact that what |
have said l. not In keeping with the
idea which Eastern magazine writer's
and ccusorcd newspapers have given
NJ Mr. Folk II IL possible that | have
made mistakes. n so. Mr. Foil will
know. and ho * the man TO reply. a
rcniy made by tho Republicans. who
edit the 81 Louis Star or the Globe.
Democrat will not suffice. It should
come from Mr.. Folk In a s%traisht-for.
ward. manly way. aud I will PROMPTLY
correct any statements whnso accur
acy De successfully CHALLENGES.
4 have not been discussing Mr.
Folk a. circuit attorney. have been
discussing Nr Fuik o. q man who ls
seeking tho Democratic nomination Tor
Governor Mr. F1iN. therefore owes
10 in his PARTY o. q candidate for unlcr
"a rcrly 20 tho charge that he refused
io support 90 whom appealed 10 through
lts representative men n he has any
excuse 20 on'r. W. OUGHT 20 have Il
n he has none. hc orght TO adm, ~
But what excuses be- hns. and what
explanations he has. should BE- maze
by himself. and not BY n Of his
ienu'ios.
u charge that Mr. Folk made his
Democratic speech IN Tho campaign ~
1900. when be- was a candidate for Of.
Zee. and that. although repeatedly In.
yltpi and requested 20 "a do he Re-
fused to make a speech whom his plf'y
required n. and that tho first noliticni
.rcoch he made since those Of Nnvom
her. 1900 was a speech made M 81
1n."nh. ur October eiih when he WIS
arain = candidate. n period Of three
years having elapsed. In which tine
he refused ilmc and again to assist IN
% ~ mo battles of hls party.
charge him now with having made his
last speech IN tis own interest In ia00.
and thai his next sn0cch. three years
later WIS AGAIN made Ia his own In.
ior's' 7 charro that he has been
selfish. and hat he has nj all times
considered himself and not his party
The Montgomery tribune. (Montgomery City, Mo.) 1892-1910, 1904-11-04

the usual personal canvass, he spoke
In various parts Of the city. he cir.
euIated his cards. went owe into the
Democratic s~trorphoids In the Butler
districts. solicited their support. re-
eeived u. and was elected with the
rest Of the Democratic ticket.
Since his speeches In the election
Of 1900. he has not spoken one word
In behalf OF the Democratic party or
his Democratic associates. His last
Democratic speech was made Ia 1900.
His noxt political speech was made on
October -. ~ this year. u period Of
three years Intervening. during which
time. although repeatedly called upon
by party leaders. and although his
failure To speak or 10 make a state.
mcnt was a local campaign issue. he
did not at any time or upnn any oc.
casion or anywhere that ! have heard
". or have any knowiedrc Of. speak
n word or make statement In
behalf Of the party that had put him
into omcai position.
'fn 1909 the Democrats placed IN
tho field q splendid city ticket This
ticket received the endorsement Of the
81. Louis Republic md the 81. Louis
Postnlspatch Compared man Tor
man with the Republican ticket II vas
Infinitely superior In ne makeup. both
In personnel. ability and freedom from
Objectionable criticism.
"Mr Folk was called upou carly IN
the campairn 10 speak FOR the party
He gave some cvaslvc answer.
"As the campaign went on. some
OF the candidates on the ticket. and
some NJ the party leaders. became
irlrhieroi They thought that We
might probably lose the city ticket
and that the state ticket would suffer
heavy losses In ST. Louis. II Mt. Folk
did not make his position clear. Gov.
The Montgomery tribune. (Montgomery City, Mo.) 1892-1910, 1904-11-04
HALVES MADE FOLK CIRCUIT ATTORNEY.

Folk he expressed a natural hesltaney
about entering into what then seemed
to be . hopeless contest.
HE wanted TO know three things.
first what would II cost 10 secure the
nomination, second what, in my opin-
Ion, were the prospects OF his elect
Ion. and third. what In my opinion
would be the effect upon him per
sonally II he we're defeated.
"He was nemlnstsd BY the Demo.
cratic party for the positlen Of circuit
attorney, and q once began N aetSvs
eampsloN In M svvW bshslt. ~ Msts
The Montgomery tribune. (Montgomery City, Mo.) 1892-1910, 1904-11-04

"when the discussion turned upon
the ONCE Of circuit attorney, ! propos-
ed the name Of Joseph W. Folk. He
was unknown to the o.hss gentlemen
present. vouehed for HE Democracy.
spoke OF his ability and personality,
and was then authorized = wait upon
Mr.. Folk and ask him II ID would con-
sent to the uss Of HE No. fer the
position Of circuit atterne7I The ~
publlesns had elected . me- - III this
pesition for the prscs6&n0 twelve
yss'ss - that wAen I Ell - ~
The Montgomery tribune. (Montgomery City, Mo.) 1892-1910, 1904-11-04
HAYES CHALLENGE TO FOLK.

~ have charged Mr.. Folk with self.
ish conduct. ! charge him with a lack
OF proper party spirit. In that he has
not given defiance to the foes Of the
party which placed him In power. I
have stated that he has received loval
n Unanimous support from Demo
cratic ofhelals, and all classes Of chi.
aens ! the City Of q. leuIs, sxespt.
ing The criminals he ne ben prece-
The Montgomery tribune. (Montgomery City, Mo.) 1892-1910, 1904-11-04
Estimdte of Folks Character by Folks Campaign Manager

Harry B. Halves. wsHAs Been Named by Folk and by the Demo-
cratic State Consttse to Manage the Folk Forces in St. Louis,
Reviews the DeScsatic Candidates Political History-A Vivid
Character sk,Af q scheming. Hypoen,ical. practical" Poll
tieian by the Mnwho Is Expected to Elect Him-An Address
Delivered for DeDeratic Ears Becomes Important Because Folk
Has Placed Its Aa,or in the Foremost Position in the Campaign
The Montgomery tribune. (Montgomery City, Mo.) 1892-1910, 1904-11-04

cutting, and ! charge him with not hav.
Ing properly denied the statement that
ne was not receiving this support. !
charge him with being disloyai 70 hIs
party when HE dIsioyaity was an Issue,
and now call upon him 10 deny Or
d'ssppreve any Of ths ~sestsuents
which heve mads shout HIN, AM ~
him . make thls denial personally, ~
net tsfeuoh sesso sxhoiI6
The Montgomery tribune. (Montgomery City, Mo.) 1892-1910, 1904-11-04

could not conceive how he could treat
his party in the manner he did. and
at the same time consistently ask for
higher hOnors or future favors at Its
hands. Mr. Folk cannot plead the
pressure of Official duties % an Excuse.
The Montgomery tribune. (Montgomery City, Mo.) 1892-1910, 1904-11-04

lie has had time TO make speeches In
New York. TO make good government
speeches. and TO hold each day, morn.
lng and evening. conferences with the
representatives Of the daily nows.
papers.
The Montgomery tribune. (Montgomery City, Mo.) 1892-1910, 1904-11-04

ernor a. ". Dookery. Governor vii
liam J. Stone. Colonel Moses G. Wet
more. MAJOR Harvey Salmon. and q
score Of other Democratic leaders out
In the state bcsought him TO speak
for the Democratic ticket. or. II he
were too busy to speak. TO dictate n
statement tina, he would support H.
This Mr.. Folk refused TO do. !
went TO him. so did Mr.. Thomas G.
Hcnninrs. chairman 81 our campaign
committee. and almost every Demo
crat OF prominence In St. Louis. lie
gave Us eyasiye replies. sometimes
saying that he would speak and some.
times that he would not. but he never
I'D speak or make a statement. Final.
~. ~ tho situation appeared to be.
come more complicated. and Rcnuhli.
can speakers and the Republican press
began ~ devote their whole time to
the question ~ whether Sir. Folk
would speak or not. a meeting a ar.
ranged for IN the Office Of Mayor
Wells. Tho meeting was attended by
Mayor Wells. judge Vale Rcyburn.
Mr.. Folk and myself We went over
the whole matter with Mr.. Folk. com.
raring the different candidates on the
state ticket with tho Republican can.
ildatcs. the dinorcnt candidates un the
city ticket with the Republican city
candidates.
we finally thought tina, we had
persuaded Mr.. Folk CT the necessity
Of his saying something. ana I now
positively that he promised Judge
Reyburn. Mayor Wells and myself
IN NJ. upor his return from Jefferson
City. he leaving tina, NIGHT for the Cap.
ltaI. he would either make speeches on
the stump with Mayor Wells for the
or would Issue a signed state.
ment asking the voters 10 support the
city ard State tickets.
The Montgomery tribune. (Montgomery City, Mo.) 1892-1910, 1904-11-04
THE ~FoLK.HAwEs DEAL.

: THE FoLKIHAwEs DEAL.
INTO a Political deal with Harry o. HaSss Whereby Hawes assumed
. control OF Folts campaign for governor Of Missouri.
and Felk we're boon eemparlons and political friends for
many years b' hey parted company when Folk became a candidate
Tor the Democratic nomination for Governor ,galrst Hawes Hases,
In his Hannibsi speech tprin,ed on ths pager tells how he himself
/. selected Folk for circuit attorney Of s., louls and youehed. nsrsoraliy,
. for Folks availability 70 the other Democratic bosses When Fsk
. as Halves st'tes, proved an Migrate. Halves turned en- him and de.
nouneed MIN In unmrasured terms tse the Hannibal specify
. delegates 10 the Democratic auherratoral convention. FOX declared
that fraud had been USED TO elect the Hlues delegates ard h. eireu.
,a'sa tnous.nds OF copies Of the p,stors Appeal eonienrina the
Ha"es practices at the polls. It was taken for granted by the deeen,
citizens Of ST. Louis and the State that Folk was unateribiy opposed
to Hawes and would hHht him to the bitter end. To ,e ss'orlsh~sr emit
: OF evetybedy Of any eenseeueree in the country FOLK SUPPORTED
RAVES DELEGATION IN THE CONVENTION AND HAWEs MEN
WERE SEATED.
That this is true can he proven fror, the f.s o. the St. Louis
organs. IT WAS AT THE JEFFERSON CITY CONVENTION THAT
FOLK AND AA"ss eusieo TIE RATCHET. EMBRACED AND
NATION OF SAM Q COOK AND a. o. ALLEN. FOLKS OBJECT
WAS TO SECURE THE SERVICES OF HAYES IN CARRYING ST.
LOUIS BY TIE METHODS WHICH RAVES HAD so SUCCESS.
FULLY USED IN PREVIOUS ELECTIONS.
The first fruits Of the deal appeared In the eommltteerooms Of
the convention. Folk had l76 Instructed delegates cut az a total OF
no Cook and the old machine had some e43 delegates. Folk vas
strong enough to depcse Secretary Byrne and elect a Folk secretary
In his place. These facts, rs to the respective strength Of the Folk
and machine forces are taken from the ST. Louis Republic and the
mittee In the convention. Folk had 70 out Of 10 members OF the ere.
dertiais committee. When the contest YER the ST. Louis deIeoaticn ,
came up. THE FOLK COMMITTEE. WITHOUT HEARING A SCRAP .
OF EVIDENCE AND AFTER BEING THREATENED eY MORT .
JouRpAN WITH A MINORITY REPORT IN FAVOR OF HOME
RULE FOR ST. LOUIS. SEATED THE HALVES DELEGATION AND
THEREBY NOMINATED SAM q. COOK FOR SECRETARY OF =.
STATE.
convention and the nomination Of Cook, to the employment Of Harry
Folk, who had thrown ali dsceney 10 the winds. ""
These ars facts; facts complied from Democratic sources. Their
to-day the eampa'e" manager OF Joseph W. Fok. /.
The Montgomery tribune. (Montgomery City, Mo.) 1892-1910, 1904-11-04

your standard.bearer and my stand.
~ard.bearcr.' thereby arouslng n great
demonstration Of enthusiasm"
Under these circumstances Demo
Gratis cannot object TO having the pep.
pie Of Missouri know just what Mr..
Halves true opinion u ~ tho man
Folk for whom he asks the Democrats
OF tho state 10 cast their ballots. As
to how Mr. HAYES rcconciics his ron.
science In appealing for votes for
tho mar whom he declared a party
traitor and a hypocrite less than a
year aro. Il certainly no nee ~
ours. OUR Duty Is TO LET THE
PEOPLE Know THE UNBIASED
HAYES OPINION OF THE MAN
FOLK WHOM HE rs NOW srp.
PORTING.
WHAT WILL HAYES RECEIVE
FOR HIS srRvIcEsf II ELECTED.
WILL FOLK MAKE HIM POLICE
COMMISSIONER ~ ct I0rfss OR
WILL HALVES RE APPOINTED TX.
else COMMISSIONER?
Tho speech delivered ~ hannibal
by Mr. Hawes was published later IN
pamphlet form. hv Mr.. Halves. and
some 10000 copies were dis'ribu,ed
over the state. The pamphlet con.
talns 20 PAGES. r. bound In yellow
paper and bears on the title
page the following:
ADDRESS
hy
Hon HARRY n HAYES
Delivered NJ
HANNlnii- $40.
Wednesday November ~. 1909"
An wen one.half " the pamphlet
from the twentieth 20 the forilc'h
parcs-is taken up with n rcvlew ~
the political NE and character of
Joseph W Folk nv his present cam
palrn manager. Harry n Hawcs.
With The exception NJ a few in0cuous
paragraphs this part 81 the Halves
pamphlet reads as follows:
The Montgomery tribune. (Montgomery City, Mo.) 1892-1910, 1904-06-10
That Tired Feeling.

II you are languid, depressed
and incapable for work. II indicates
that your liver Is out OF order.
Hcrbinc will assist nature to throw
oil headaches, rheumatism and
ailments akin to nervousness and
restore the energies and vitality of
sound and perfect health. j. j.
Hubbard. Temple, Texas, writes,
March -, 1902: 81 have used
Herbine for the past two years.
II has done me more good than all
the doctors. When feel bad and
have that tired feeling, ! take a
dose of Herbinc. 1t is the best
medicine ever made for chills and
fever 5Octs n bottle. Sold by
City Drug Store.