Lewiston evening teller. [volume] (Lewiston, Idaho) 1903-1911, 1904-03-23

involving the labor lien law. L. Vine
yard Is attorney for respondent and
Fogg & Nugent and w. H. Cassiday
are attorneys for appellant
J. P. Vollmer, respondent, VS.. the
estate of J. w. Reid, deceased ct al,
appellants. This is an action on a
promissory note secured by a mort
gage on law books. G. w. Tannahill
is attorney for respondent and D.
Needham is attorney for appellants
Adele T. Ford. respondent, vs.. Wash
/ ington National Building & Loan In
vestment association. appellant, is a
suit from Latah county on a promis-
sorry note and involves the homestead
exemption law. Cullen & Dudley are
attorneys for respondent and Forney
& Moore and Peters & Powell are at
torneys for appellant.
John E. Kendall. respondent. VS..
Lincoln Hardware & Implement COM
pany, appellant is a suit from Idaho
county in an action on a promissory
note for goods and wares furnished.
c. S. Stone, E. E. Squires and j. F.
-.
c. S. Stone. E. f. Squires and ]. F.
Mclean, sheriff, are correspondents.
Donald & DeHaven are attorneys for
respondents and /. n Smith is attor-
ney for appellant.
Emily Fl. Roby, appellant, VS.. Ebert
c. Roby, respondent, is an action from
this county preying alimony and dis
tribution Of property. 6. w. Tannahill
is attorney for appellant and c. L. Nc
Donald is attorney for respondent.
Kate Deeds, respondent, VS.. Lottie
Stephens. appellant, is an action for
specific performance of contract in
volving lease on the Grand hotel in
this city. Mcfarland & Mcfarland are
attorneys for respondent and l. N.
Smith is attorney for appellant.
The State of Idaho, respondent, vs.
David Harness. appellant is an appeal
from an order out of the district court
in this county denying a motion for
new trial. The appellant was convict
ed in the district court on the charge
OF rape. Attorney General Bagley is
attorney for the respondent and G. w
Tannahill is attorney for appellant.
A. T. Spottswood and Fred Veatch
appellants, VS.. John B. Morris as ad-
ministrator of the estate of b. F. Nor
ris ct al. respondents. This case is an
action from Nez Perce county for the
recovery of commission on real es-
tate involving the Denver Townsite
sale. /. N. Smith is attorney for APP
pellants and j. E. Babb is attorney
for j. p. Vollmer and r. Schleicher
and D. Needham is attorney for J. B.
Morris and Harritt F. Morris
Geo. Steltz, appellant, VS.. VIM. II.
Young. respondent is an action for
possession of IA piano and originated
i'm Latah county. S. S. Denning is at
torney for appellant and D. Needham
is attorney for respondent.
State of Idaho. respondent. vs.
James B. Cray. appellant. is an appeal
from idaho county in the district court
where appellant was refused a new
trial. f. n. Griffith. Clay McNamee
and Attorney General Bagley are at
| torneys for respondent and Miles s.
Johnson and A. s. Hardy are attor-
neys for appellant.
Charles p. Coey. plaintiff and ap-
pellant, vs. Geo. F. Cleghorn. defend
ant and respondent. Is a case from
Kootenai county and is an action for
the recovery Of sum of money. Del
Cary Smith and Edwin McBee are
attorneys for appellant and C. L. Heit-
man il attorney for respondent.