The Manning times. [volume] (Manning, Clarendon County, S.C.) 1884-current, 1904-02-24

II would be necessary for the State to
IurrESi, 4 column to replace the one
broken. The column was q portion or
lh'a material To Ge furnished by the
State under the contract and there
Was no douot in the minds Of 4 ma
jority Of the commission, after 4 care
full examination Of the contract, plans
and specifications, that the commission
could have been compelled by the con-
tractor to furnish Z new column.
TO quarry and carve q neH column
would have cost the State at least
g., 900; it would have delayed the work
Of completion OF the State house about
six months.
The contractor reported that the
column could be patched by putting in
a section of new stone at = cost OF
about $500, and 4 delay in the work OF
30 days.
according to the plans there were to
be two columns placed within what is
now the open floor space On the front
portico. These columns supported none
OF the weight Of the walls of the struc-
ture, and were located by the architect
within this area because under tho
approved plans the State had on hand
two columns that could be used for
purely ornamental purposes. The con-
tractor proposed to the commission
that he would deduct the cost OF rails
ing these two inner columns into posi-
ton and the cost of the unfinished
carving Of caps for same if they could
be left out, and the work proceed.
Upon the report of the architect that
the strength Of the structure Of the
completed building would be in no
wise impaired. this solution Of the
problem was deemed the best and most
expedient, inasmuch as the funds in
the hands Of the commission were
limited, the work would not be de-
layed and no damage would be done
the structure. At a subsequent meet
ing Of the legislature the broken col
umns were appropriated and given by
the State to Greenwood and Spartan
burg.
The question of utility having been
settled to the satisfaction of q ma
jority Of the commission it then be-
came one purely Of taste and ornament.
and upon this issue We considered that
the best interests Of the State were
Subserred by carrying to completion
the front portico as it now stands.
It may be added that in the final vote
as to leaving out these two centre COL
unns that Messrs. Can't and Johnson
voted with Mr.. Marshall in the mega
tive, the other members present con-
stituting a majority, voting in the
affirmative.
In addition to the $500 above men
toned as part Of the consideration
for relieving the contractor Of the work
Of placing the columns the comm;s-
sion reserved for the benefit Of the
State the remnants Of the broken COL
umns.
THE CEILING IN THE MAIN
LOBBY.
One Of the most serious charges
brought by the investigating commit
tee related to the removal Of the cell
ing in the main lobby and this is q
typical illustration of their methods
and of the value Of their conclusions.
Captain" Hunt in his testimony
(p. ~ swore that the State had lost
in his opinion $4,000 by the removal
Of this ceiling, which was represented
as steel" ceiling and that 'had cost
in the reighborhood Of $4,000" {p. ~
Now, what are the facts?, The Off
cial records OF the old State house
commission show the awarding Of the
contract for this ceiling as follows:
Columbia, S. c., May End, 1889. The
commission met this day. Present:
Hon. J. Q. Marshall, secretary Of
,.
general The bids were presented, be-
ing six in number, for putting in iron
(galvanized) ceiling, beams, skylights.
ETC., in the main corridor on the second
floor, together with the ceiling over
the senate lobby. :" Mr.. John
Alexander's bid upon plan No. 1, for
$I,898 was accepted"
This record was accessible to the In
yestigating committee and could have
clearly shown them that this ceiling
did not cost "in the neighborhood Of
S10,000," but that the ceiling of the
senate lobby, which had not been re-
moved, and the cornice Of the main
lobby, which was still there, consti-
tuted three-fourths Of the work for
which less than $4,000 had been paid,
and that the ceiling that mad been
removed cost, is years ago, less than
$1,000. It is very plain piece Of work
with little ornamentation and Ger
tainly not beautiful. Architect Wilson
in mis- report stated that it could now
be put back for about s1,S00.
This ceiling, as the records show, was
not only bought as galvanized iron, but
an actual inspection Of it will show
that the ceiling taken out was nothing
but galvanized iron. The committee
for.ld that "the contractors bodily took
and carried away and converted to
their own use this valuable and beauti-
full part Of the old building" (p. y
when one Of the FIVE witnesses whom
they themselves put upon the stand
certified and could have told them that
1t was galvanized iron, and when re-
moved worthless even as junk" tSee
affidavit Of j. B. Garfunkel, Exhibit
F.. DR.. Babcock, superintendent Of
the Hospital for the Insane, certifes
that the ceiling is now in his posses
sion as an officer of the State. (See
certificate Of J. ". Babcock, Exhibit
y.
The commission put back exactly the
same material they took out, simply
requiring the contractor to replace
worthless and damaged material with
new material of the same kind.
Tie Tanton misrepresentation which
j.. was necessary for this so-calied
| architect" to make to show. that the
removal Of dozen squares of gal
vanized iron which was in bad shape,
bent and rusted. and replacing it with
other galvanized iron of a pattern
which better suited the round opening
of the dome entailed a loss of $4,000
upon the State. certainly entitled him
to the compensation Of SIS day, which
| he was paid and which. he was evi-
IDENTIFY industriously endeavoring to
earn.
If the ceiling removed could be
properly designated as "steel ceiling"