The times dispatch. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1903-1914, 1904-04-24

AS between Parker and Hearst, favor
Parker. t at5 .3
(. GlLLlAM,b ROBERT. Member State
Central Committee. Petersburg:
think sentiment is in favor of Par
ker. 3S8
GORDON, r. L., Member State Central
Committee, Louisa: s g
cannot give categorical answer to
your question. | am neither for Parker
nor Hearst. If Judge Parker should
be. as | believe him to be Identified will
lmonopolyI should prefer Hearstt
& want some candidate who will stand
sqllarely upon the last Democratic plat
form, leaving out free silver. l cannot
give YOU the sentiment of this community
with any degree OF accuracy, but have
heard more expression of opinion in favor
| GLASGOW, JOSEPH A. Chairman
| Committee, Staunton, Augusta county,
While there has been a movement favor.
able to Vim. II. Hearst in Staunton, the
predomnntng sentiment OF Staunton and
Augusta county is most favorable to
Judge Alton Il. Parker.
I'M GAFFlGAN, WIN. e., Chairman Com
mlttoe, Tanpico, York county:
think our people prefer Judge Parker.
GREGORY, j. D., Member State Exc
cutivc Committee. Roanoke:
So far as have heard 1t expressed.
sentiment is in favor Of Judge Parker or
some other conservative man.
LOUIS, A. M, Chairman Committee,
Joncsville, Lee county:
So far as / have heard It expressed,
sentiment seems to be for Parker, as be.
tween Parker and Hearst.
HOLLAND, j. PETER, Chairman Com
mittee. Franklin Southampton county:
Sentiment in Southampton so far as
have been able to ascertain Is favorable
TO Parker. Hearst has little or no follow
ing here.
HARRIS, J. M, Chairman Committee,
Blackstone, Nottoway county:
Very few, If any. Of our people are COM
mittcd on this question. National poll
tics not yet discussed much, l know OF
no Hearst supporters here. Our people
will favor n conservative and available
man. and think they consider Judge
Parker such n man.
HARDWOOD, JOHN S., Member State
Central Committee, Richmond:
Sentiment Is for Parker, first, last ana
all tho time,
!. d 7ShFCHy WV
Warm Springs. Bath county:
Sentiment Is divided. Parker Is prob
ably favoritc, but have not heard express
sion from many.
HARPER, JOHN, Lynchburg
Sentiment Is overwhelmingly IN favor
of Judge Parker as between Hearst ana
Parker
HOOKER. Member State Central Com
mittce, Stuart, Va:
Pulaski Is solid for Parker,
HAY, JAMES, Member State ESecu-
tive Committee:
AS between Parker and Hearst ] pre-
fer Parker.
IRVINE, r. T., Member State EXecu-
tive Committee Big Stone Gap:
There is some Hearst sentiment In the
extreme southwest, but think the OVER
whclmng preponderance is IN favor 81
Judge Parker.
JONES, WIN. A., Member State Execu-
tive Committee.
AS presently advised ! regard Judge
Parker as the most available Democratic
candidate for the presidency Having
been IN WASHINGTON and away from my
Virginia home for the past SIN months,
/ cannot say what sentiment is In thal
section,
JONES, GEO, W., Member state Gem
trul Committee, Berkley'
Sentiment strong for Parker.
JORDAN, j. r., Chairman Committee,
Smlthheld, Isle OF Wight county:
Sentiment is for Parker.
KELLEY, S. L., Member State ENecu-
tive Committee, Richmond;
Sentiment Is decidedly for Parker
KEEzELL, GEO. g., Chairman Com
mtttec, Keezelltown. Rockingham county:
am for neither Parker nor Hearst J
prefer Democrat whose public record
entities him to such an honor, and VINO
is neither the protege Of the Cleveland
Iin party workers Of 1896 and 1900. nor
Of the extremists who train with W, j,
Bryan. a man acceptable 10 the more
than 6,O00,0D0 Democrats WHO voted the
ticket In 1896 and 1900 rnther than
man acceptable TO the Standard oil trust.
as Your Sundays issue says Parker
would be- / have not canvassed the sem
tment Of my community to any great
extent, but am sure they are not work.
ing for % man TO protect the oil trust.
LYNCH, JOHN j.. Member state Gen.
trail Committee, Richmond
AN far as ] am able 10 learn, the sent!'