The daily morning journal and courier., 1904-05-04

IL IS an acllCn 10 recover lHlTteell months rent, which is a cliam disputed by che defendant, because of the pei'- dency Of the settlement of the affairs Of the estate of the late c. E. Thomp- son e St. John street.
 Newton. Church & Hewitt are coun- sel for the plaintiff and Ely & Barclay
 About forty new cases were returned yesterday by the civil superior court, or about the usual spring number In the bunch are an even dozen exparte di- vorce cases. The cases follow;
 State of Connecticut vs. James T. Law of New York, and Thomas G. Ben- nett of New Haven, suit for $2,500 dam ages.
 The defendant Law was Co-executor & Co.,, trustee, with John Nicoll under the will of John E. Law of this city. It is alleged that on November 5, 1902, James T. Law, as trustee, received $1,- 196 from the proceeds of the sale of six shares of the stock of the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific railroad company.
 On February 10, 1904, Law was re- moved from the office of executor by the probate court
 It is said that Law has never account ed for the $1,196 and has refused to pay over the same upon the demand of John Nicoll, who is now acting as sole trus- tee. MT. Bennett is made co-defendant as he went on Laws bond.
 Henry c. Johnson vs. Amelia Belz, alias Amelia Belz Johnson; suit for the annulment of marriage on the ground that plaintiff had been drawn into the ceremony through fraud.
 H. l.. Handy & Co., vs. Greenspun Brothers; suit to recover $500 on alleged debt.
 Alexander Macdonald vs. Fair Haven and Westville railroad; suit for SS,000 for injuries received when struck by a car in Carlisle street on January g, 1904
 John H. Mcdonald vs. Fair Haven and Westville road; suit for $500 for damage to sleigh in collision in Forbes avenue, January Il, 1904.
 Town of Meriden ct al, vs John Ives ct all. foreclosure on taxes
 Milford Savings Bank vs John L. Sweet ct ux.; foreclosure for $750,
 Milford Savings Bank vs. John w. Mccormick ct al; foreclosure on note for $2,65185.
 William R. Pitt vs. Albert A. Bald- win; foreclosure for $5, 800 on property in Milford.
 Herbert L. Pratt vs. Fair Haven and Westville railroad: suit for $5,000 for personal injuries received November 14 1903; plaintiff was thrown from a car near Yale field
 Theresa Smiths appeal from probate relates to the contest of the will of the late Patrick Faughnan; plaintiff is the daughter of the testatrix who was be- queathed only $f00.
 Annie E. Stewards appeal from pro- bate relates to the refusal of the pro- bate court to remove Mrs Cable as ex- ecutrix of the estate of her husband, the late Judge Julius c. Cable. The latter was administrator of the estate of the late Milton J. Stewart, husband of the apellant in this case.
 The Savings Bank of Ansonia vs. ex- Senator Sturgis WhitIock; suit of fore dence of Senator Whitlock in Shelton is held as security for the note. The resi- dence is said to have cost $60,O00
 The Wire Novelty Manufacturing Go. vs. R. A. Finney ct al. suit for $500 on an alleged debt
 Senator Smith vs Wallingford Gas Light Co.,. suit for $1,OOO. It is claimed that leaking gas from defendants pipes made its way into plaintiffs house and forced him to vacate the premises.
 Mary Ives Thompson vs. Consolidated road; suit for $5,000 for death of Eugene M. Thompson, who was killed by the cars in this city on July z, 1903.
 F. J. Cronan vs. T. w. Corbett; suit for SS,OOO, involving dispute over the brick block in Ashmun street built by Maier Arick. Defendant was appointed receiver of the property and also had a lien on the same for $3,540; plaintiff claims to hold a note against Arick ct al. which was assigned to them; plain- tiff besides asking for damages also asks for receiver.
 Gould F. Hubbell vs. Nettie M. Hub- bell married June IS, 1900; intenper- ance alleged.
 Florence C. Morgan vs. Robert Nor gan, End: married November 27. 1889. cruelty.