The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1904-08-02

nation and belief that said Samuel
Parker is the chief promoter of the
Hamakua Ditch Company and has
large interests in the same, and that
said ]. s. Low and said Samuel Parker
have acted in unison and in concert
in promoting the acquisition of said
right of way and the sale of said Pa
auhau land. it being directly for the
interests of said Samuel Parker that
said plans should be carried out:
]. S. LOW ASSISTING SAM PAR
KER.
Eighteenth: That petitioner further
says that said J. S Low has assisted
and is now assisting said Samuel Par
ker in the efforts of said Samue. Par
ker to secure possession of the ,tire
Parker Ranch as aforesaid, including
the interests of petitioners daughter
therein. and though assuming to act
as next friend of said minor is ac-
quiescing and asserting TO the con-
tention OF Samuel Parker that he is
the sole surviving partner of a part
nership claimed by him to have existed
between him and the said John P. Par
ker the second as hereinabove alleged
and set forth:
COLLISION AND FRAUD RE
TWEEN Low AND PARKER.
Nineteenth: That petitioner under
stands that the effect of conceding such
claim on the part of said Samuel Par
ker would be to deprive said minor
through her guardian or otherwise of
the possession or immediate control of
her interests in said Parker Ranch,
al nd hot cni
on have to be subordinate to the pos
session and management of said Sa-
muel Parker, who would exercise ex-
elusive management of the alleged pur-
pose of winding up the affairs of the
partnership alleged by the said Samuel
Parker to have existed between him
and the said John p. Parker the sec
ond as aforesaid. And your petitioner
says, that such claim on the part of
said Samuel Parker is against the in
terests of her daughter and would. if
carried out, work great and irrepara BILE
injury to the same, and charges that
said ]. S. Low in already conceding
said claim on the part of Samuel Par
ker is acting collusively and fraudu-
lently with said Samuel Parker against
the interests of said minor and in di-
49, HAOAeNNAOAi VI the OOl1Sdl1OIlS 1I1pOS-
ed upon him, the said ]. S. Low as
next friend of said minor and that if
the control of her daughters interests
snail come into the hands of said J. S
Low, or under his control. and the OBJ
portunity offers itself SO to do, that the
said j. S. Low is likely to act upon the
concession already made by him and
to surrender all claim on the part of
said minor to the management of her
interests in the Parker Ranch to said
Samuel Parker; and petitioner charges
that the aim and purpose of said J S.
Low in pursuing the course above out
lined is to promote his own private
interests and those of said Samuel Par
ker against the interests and the tights
of said minor. And petitioner is adj
vfsed by those learned in law that upon
the 1ndisputable facts relating thereto
there is no merit wha tsoeveI. in the
contention of said Samuel Parker that, |
as surviving partner, he is entitled TO
the exclusive management and posses
sion of said Parker Ranch: and that |
there is nothing to justify said .J s |
Low in conceding, as he does, in his |
suit for the removal of A w Carter |
as guardian of said minor any such
contention on the part of said Samuel |
Parker;