New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1904-08-19
WATSON MAKES BIG HIT
Continued from nrst page.


rule passed s,r snd Ths steps, Is
for even the Democratic bosses require more tnba
ersSfs the in4 Wa Street. e whip heads Of his
ocrato iegions were made TO furi their flags and
T6e mass of the DEMOCRATS party feel ontraged
the way in which their leaders nnVf h so x anu
10 h Mit sdffs oa me a9 Who followed Bryan NTH
SesT on es hs now rS &c a"h eysrea ike cattle
who knitted ra h 9sf5 Gs 0 Of the
who voted for Bryan are men Of a0 rng
their battle W.
PEOPLES PARTY UNCHANGED.
Where are the who followed ;he so1tns s9
OF the Democratic standard neare5 d tsey honestly
believe in the principles they profesSed? oenSts
ia ned sfs sn Sd with Ae the %ho
our and II. mySs ,s aa snS helping to
Sebrazks vots to to- REMIND Sands sas
s %6ess il d tha hs' aa hf Il Rs
pn ca nd then b she ss ou sd 10 sf million
Sry s Ksssas in c ies p Sh
osH and "a Ia there Sos ses
4SI fdT To Of s a tRas elan
You set e out Of M 70 Goes Pa1k der
fer you Il you believe Repqbcah 5ooTibnes
vote for paIk soe w Ur nHs What
right do the DEMOCRATIC leaders under1als s any
economic QuestIons7
GOING BACK ON THEIR OWN WORDS
How do We kaow that they have studied and
mastered any OF those questions? Never IN ,n !,
did DIDO on the money question from to the year
Sf ey ma ths aga th anq RspuScan
the money question were put INTO br ~ Ca neIs
the would Stretch from one end to n tine
Ierstand the money question? II not. how do we
noT that they no nd aay f G1eeT
leaders tqs ssy ave aPo uHatcTsb opposed
mem raI s the eG esat he Is
ably in favor of Al OF th1 ny lfe f5
prophecies OF eight years have been repudiated
tax ake y place If the Republicans carried out their
policy the money question nave eeen put , asiGs.
can people as pnslterabiy opposed have, shifted
over to the position of being irrevocaby in favor
tPg Ssa INTO to
forget the history Of the last eight years? Do
in he altitude Of confessing colossal blunder
as they made upon the money question that they
ars ask Did they know what they We're talking
about dgTng those esht Or hey s
were ignorant upon the money question; II so;
thew are wiser today than they were yesterday?
But perhaps they new that hs Ss peop
hw .v w e sy SGt fh as hy ns
ter6ay?
AMAZING EFFRONTERY.
Of effrontery for the Democratic party to go be
eight years they have been wrong and the Re-
pIbllcans have been right and at the same t time
sa be put %o the Be Of mfse Th2 H
Thing would happen. and 80 far as am concerned
Do not believe that i will happen; ,n., ., tho
gold STANDARD be reht as both Of the SlG PsFf
give the credit and the support TO the men who
were brave enough TO pioneer It's way. fight It's
But we are told that the Democratic party has
ta.en praVt s npotenon is robbefy II that
desarsio4 means @hgSnTE sosi dl.bonsTt
But they would never dare 10 say that the Amssi,
what II ordinarily would mean Even those who
claim that the words mean "a tariT Tor revenue
3 CANDIDATE Who declares that while he would be
I glad revision OF the tarin. he knows that
@t any doubt Upon that great subject. he stands
single sun is fred The campaign has nGt even
Tsev Commences his retreat Therefore the great
! tariff question may be considered as waived
'o. , a. US 'n s5 Shat else the national pemocr
party present.. MS an issue In their platform they
the trusts But their candidate. in his speech OF
RRssG or all i PFaSca I |
trust question is precisely the same as tina, OF
the national Republicans And as further proof
any loss Of sleep to the Havouey the Rookie;
feliers. you have only TO remember that in 1S,
wt,biG whose barriers ali trusts are formed, IN
sH Gs %he we ' eo na sSf the m
Ing the platform OF 1892 IN the light Of the ad-
mltted iufanies OF Clevelapd's second SdmnistTa-
ton, with It's well remembered surrender To he
ItIaIr God de1er us from another redemptioa
OF Democratic pledges on the subject cc the tariff
and trusts.
no DIFFERENCE ON IMPERIALISM.
But told that on the question Of imperial
ism there is "a difference, vital and tar reaching
between the Republicans and the Democrats Wha
g II? We have that Judge Parker is IN
favor OF granting local disagreement 10 the
Philippine Islands when they become prepared for
& When will they become prepared for II? Judge
Parker does VIII II be four years. forts
years four hundred years? No mortal tel
what the Judge means. But he certainly does no
express the Intention 20 do ANYTHING whatever
about It during his term. II he should be elected
nor does he specify wherein the Republicans have
gone wrong in the management. OF that question
Let us presume that Judge Parker, against Who's
character would not venture 10 say n word. fo
believe him to be an eminently worthy man
let presume I say. that Judge Parker, as thu
champion and representative of the great Demo
cratic party. has the courage OF his convictions
II do presume this. his failure to state wherein
he would make any change IN the policy which
. no Pei PhiltpDnPS.