Bisbee daily review., 1904-12-31
ROCKEFELLER
 TO INTEND TO
 SHAKE ROGERS
RUMORS OF BREACH BETWEEN LAWSON'S ENEMY AND
 ROCKEFELLER.
Lawyer Says That Rogers Has Busi- ness of His Own-lawson. TOO. Differentiated Beie>Neex Company ard The Men interested in 1t.

New York, Dee. 3O.-Coior was lent yesterday by the statement made by the Standard oil company. to reports circulated in Wall street of an i'm mineut breach between John D. Rocke- felier anG Henry H. Rogers on account of the noJoriety achieved by the latter in connection wi,h Thomas w. Law sons disclosures.
 According 10 the story. so intensely annoyed is MT. Rockefeller over tue connection of the Standard Offs name with MT. Rogers speculative ventures that he has net or1iy emphaucaily vetoed legal action. which Mir. Rogers desired 10 take. but is contemplating making a statement. pointing out the difference between what MT. Rogers may do and what is dCns by the Standard Oil company A announced in the World yesterday. MT Rockeiel- Ter is now the only person standing in the way of legal action by Nr. Reg CTS against Thomas w Lawson.
 N r Elliott, attorney for the com pany yesterday emphasized the dis tinction between personal ventures oi MT Rogers or others connected with the Standard Oil company and tue company itself. NJ Ellot, holds the title Attorney of the Standard Oil company and has been with Mir. Rockefeller for many years s. C. T. Dodd is solicitor for the company
 As attorney for the Standard OiI company" said ne yesterday T know nothing whatever about Mr Lawsoa's g disclosures. It is not matter in which this company is concerned. MT qwscu. in the first or second article he wrote. made it very clear 1hac he drew a distinction between the Stand ard Oil company and those who Were interested either as stockholders CT cfficers of the company. lie announc- cd he would always refer to the 'St2nC- ard Oil as entirely distinct from Jte Standard Oil company.
 MT. Lawson has told nothing about he Standard Oil company. because ne knows nothing This company is On gagged in the oil business and nothing else"
 Tt has been made plain. has il not. that Air. Rockefeller is not interested in any way in Amalgamated Copper?
 MI. Rockefeller issued a statement 10 that effect himself. In that state meut he said that the Standard Oil company. he or his son. had no, Q single share of stock in the company.
 "Is it true that there is any diff2.- ence between MT. Rogers and Nil. Rockefeller ever the recent squab5ie over Amalgamated?'
 ,CtbisU lO11r such matters am attending to legal business for the company. and I know nothing about the personal side"
 MT Elliott added that he did EC' know what companies MT. Rockefeilel had been interested in outside thy Standard Oil.
 .'Is it not true that the close connec lion cf MT. Rogers with the Standard Oil company has created the connec tion iu the popular mind that the com pany itself has been inyolyed?"
 That may be so. though Mir Law son made a clear distinction. IL can not be denied that MT. Rogers is an Of ficer Of the Standard Oil company but he has a very large business oHc side
 Samuel Utermyer, counsel for Mir Rogers. denied yesterday that he knew anything of the subpoena issued ii Boston yesterday citing a Bostol newspaper Sealer to appear in cour today for selling Everybody's Maga zine.
 T have no connection with it." h. said Roger Foster. one of the meI attacked by Lawson in his last article refused to say whether or not he wa back of the summons. He talked abou every phase of the case freely. bu said: T haven't a word to say abou the subpoena
 Yesterday. for jhe first time in twt weeks. Mir. Lawson failed to bOmbart Wall stret with messages. Not 2 line from him. James R. Keene coult not bee xeen at the Waldorf-Astoria sending back word that he had nothing to say.
 Another listless market was ex perienced. and it was agreed that Law had so frightened the public that busi ness will de dull for a long time.
 
 Charles W Stone. Arizona's reliable Optician, will be at the Emporium for a few days He is well known n B.S