Daily Kennebec journal. [microfilm reel] (Augusta, Me.) 1870-1975, 1904-11-02

The following are some OF the lie"
entries at this term:
y II Jacobs W.. Fred r. Dollof ct
ais. X. W. Leighton. Esq, Tor the
pl,intjff. :. & l.. Titcomb for the de-
PENDANT.
George II. Powell. petitioner for re-
view. IS. Naoma Cleaves. George "
Filed Esq, for the plaintiff.
David F.. Parsons vs.. WatervIlie x
Oakland street Railway 60. George
W. Field Esq. for the plaintiff, ana
charles = Johnson. ESD, for the de-
PENDANT. 49,,
George W. Field VS. Jason Fl. Bick-
fnrd Il ais. George w. Field, Esq, for
rlaintilf and c. W. Hussey. ESD FOR
the defendant.
Jason GAYLORD vs.. Sanford J. Baker
George w. Field, Esq. for the pam
tiff.
Judith F. Copp. administrators, vs..
,ugust, Winthrop & Gardiner Rail-
way +. N. Thompson, Esq, FOR me
,r,intiff and Heath & Andrews for the
DEFENDANT
Frederick r. Eradstreet ct ais vs.
Sarah q. Bassett ct ais. O. ID. BAKER
Esq. for the plaintiff. and Heath
Andrews for the defendant.
Lester A. Partridge VS.. Augusta
Winthrop & Gardiner street Railway.
Thomas Leigh ESQ. for the plalntlH'
ana q u. Baker, Esq. and Heath
Andrews for the defendant.
Everett NJ. Mower Us. Augusta, Win
throp & Gardiner Street Railway.
Thomas Leigh. Esq, for the plalntiH'
and q. D. Baker. Esq. and Heath 4
Andrews for the defendant.
Inhabitants of town of winthrop VS..
Clinton r. Prescott. Cornish & Bassett
for the plaintiff and Cakes. Pulslirr Il
hidden for the defendant.
Henry F. Emery vs.. Fred Howard.
administrator. ct ais. Beane 4 Beahe
for the plaintiff.
Esther :. Sinclair VS.. Gorham {,
shaw. ct ais. Oliver Il. Clason. EST.
and Cornish & Blssctt for the pam
tiff and Charles F. Johnson, Esq. for
the defendant
Gardiner National Bank VS.. A. Full
Ter. II. A. Fuller and George w. Hesel-
ton. assignee and trustee. Oliver Il.
Ctason. Esq. for the plaintiff.
Gardiner National Bank VS.. George
w. H.selton. assignee. Oliver Il. Ga
son. Esq. for the plaintiff.
Alvilla Newell VS.. Jonathan Newell
Oliver T. GLEASON. ESD, for the plain
tiff and George w. Heselton. Esq, for
the defendant.
The following actions for divorce are
on the docket to be heard by Justice
WhitehOuse at this term:
Harriet P. Haywood of Winthrop VS..
Ralph II. Haywood of Winthrop. for
gross and confirmed habits of intoXiCa-
ton. gross. cruel and wanton neglect
and refusal to provide suitable main
tenance and cruel and abusive treat
ment l.. T. Carleton. Esq, of Winthrop
for the libellant
Lena Pooler of Augusta VS.. Joseph
Pooler of Augusta, for gross. wanton
and cruel neglect and refusal to pro-
vide suitable maintenance and cruel
and abusive treatment. F. w. White
house. Esq. for the libellant.
Ervina McKenney of Clinton VS..
Frank l.. Mckenney of Clinton. for
gross. wanton and cruel neglect and
refusal to provide suitable maintenance
adultery ana cruel and abusive treat
ment. {. w. Hussey. Esq, of Water
Vile for the libellant
Isabella McCutcheon of Hallowell vs..
Robert McCutcheon Of Hallowell. for
cruel and abusive treatment. Heath 4
Andrews and Thomas J. LyncI;pEsq..
of Augusta for I've libellant and Frank
G. Harrington. Esq, % Augusta for the
liZellee.
Michael E. Breck Of Augusta VS..
Ella Breck of Augusta. for adultery
and cruel and abusive treatment. F.
w. Whitehouse, Esq, of Augusta for
the lihel!ant.
Burton A. Gray Of WinsloW vs. ALICE