The Minneapolis journal. [volume] (Minneapolis, Minn.) 1888-1939, 1904-02-08

rs. IHE. N
the jury what it u.s. said Mr.. Jelly.
CHE told me. that he had. some
friends going thru st. Paul to 81 the
coast, and he wanted to met them: !
told, him that 1t would be very nice
! el econ s YOU fix the day Of the month Of !
that Saturday."
..It was early in March and the only
other time he went to St. Paul on a |
Saturday during that month.
when, IL at all, and where did J.; you
hear that he was a married man G" |
"It was early In May. He was SICK
and away from the office for two or
three days. I went to his room adj
dress to see about his health. l Went
to the door and a lady came ,ushering
we have little domestic tragedy to
relate. Everything is all right but !
want to Introduce you to my wife
"'Why Sam, didn't Mr.. Tanner
know we We're married 2 exclaimed
Mrs Hargrave.
".No;' he answered. 7 wanted to
keep it quiet so that the general man
| ager would not think Twas crazy to
get married on my small salary
But we were married on March
| T. said Mrs.. Hargrave."
The witness then proceeded to tell
of another visit to the Hargrave rooms
and being introduced to Mr.. F'itzpat-
. rick as Hazards father-in-law. Mr.
| Tanner also corroborated the COM.
planning witness testimony of the visit
| to Nevada, Iowa, and said that upon
his return Mr.. Hazard had told his
| superior Of his "mother-in-law' call
ing her a good, Christian woman
He also, according to the witness,
spoke lovingly Of his "father-in-law'
his "sister-in-law" and "brother-in-
law"
Later Developments.
'When did you first hear Of the de-
PENDANTS marriage to DR.. Burfield 2
November IL"
*'Who told you?"
."Dr. Burfeld."
"Where were you?''
cat the entrance Of DR.. Burfeld's
apartments"
"Did you see the defendant at that
time?"
eyes, SIR; they both came out Of the
door,
, chow was the defendant clad?"
"He was naked but for an over
coat"
;. "How was DR.. sBurfield clad?"
: "Objected to as inmaterial and IN
, competent" interrupted Mr.. Stiles,
and the objection was sustained.
Letters written to Mr.. Turner In
:, which the defendant referred to his
l "brother-in-law' and "father-in-laW
: and Mother Fitzpatrick were iden-
!. titled and introduced as evidence.
!, ''How often was Mrs. Fitzpatrick IN
!, your office?"
1.-TWO or three times week.
. :. ibid the defendant treat her as his
" wife,"
o Always"
did he introduce her to anyone il
your presence as his wife ?"
Eyes, good many times"
: Mr.. Jelley then announced that HI
was ready to- rest his case, but. 70
: one witness which he did not want t.
: put on until 2 o'clock and an adjourn
IS ment to that hour was ordered. Y 4
3 Many Women Hear Trial.
! Members of the fair sex were agail
in the majority when the trial wa
IS opened this morning. The doors wer
Z closed to all members OF the NAL
e persuasion not connected in some wa
with the case at bar but ladies' wer
:. admitted without question, and as
II result, typical matinee audience wa
in attendance. The principals wer
all in their accustomed places and tn
IL defendant himself, smiling and debon
nair as usual He conversed wit
Linda Burfield Hazard and his atto1
Is ney before the opening of court an
8 stated that he had confidence In tn
E outcome of. his trial.
l. w. A .Frisbie was called to the stan
Immediately after the noon recess
Z The witness sWore to q conversatio
ID with Harvard in which the latter mer
>, toned Viva kirkpatrick as his wifi
,, Saw the Ceremony
:" Fred Krause, the yonug man VIII
was in Court Commissioner Galliclk
t. office at the time Hazard and viz
e. kirkpatrick were married, was the
ne called The witness positively ider
j. titled the defendant and the prosecu
st ing witness as the parties married
d, Mr.. Gallick.
ID do you remember the date :?
of asked Mr.. Jelley.
al It do not"
- about when was it?"
- "In,the spring Of 1903"
90 GAS near as possible please rela
wv what was said after the parties wei
ne all in the office"
II GAS near as T can remember M
o." Gallick said: DO you take this ma
We to be your lawfully welded husband
~, He said yes and Mr.. Gallick the
all asked a similar question Of Mr.. Ha
IL zard and he said yes
The witness further corroborate
ort Mrs. Hazards story of the ceremon
me me Accessibility of the Case.
Ike Should Hazard be convicted the
ne. is some chance that a prosecute
- might be started against DR.. Lin
Burfield Hazard. If she married t.
|. defendant knowing at the time tn
he was the legal husband of anoth
woman and is proved guilty she
ne liable to punishment of five years
80 the penitentiary.