The Sauk Centre herald. (Sauk Centre, Stearns County, Minn.) 1886-current, 1904-09-15

fact that American warships appeared
promptly at the port of Beirut when an
effort had been made to assassinate an
American official, and in the port of Tan
gier when an American citizen had been
abducted? and that in each case the wrong
complained of was righted and expiated?
and that within the last few days the visit
of an American squadron to Smyrna was
followed by the long-delayed concession
of their just rights to those Americans con-
cerned in educational work in Turkey
Do they object to the trade treaty with
China, so full Of advantage for the Amer
lean people in the future? Do they object
to the fact that the ships carrying the
than ever before in craftsmanship and in
seamanship, as individual units and as
component parts of squadronS and fleets
If they object to any or all of these things,
we join issue with them.
Executive Encroachments."
"When our opponents speak Of EN-
croachments' by the executive upon the
authority of congress or the judiciary, APP
parently the act they ordinarily have in
view is Pension Order No rs, issued under
the authority OF existing law. This order
directed that hereafter any veteran of the
civil war who had reached the age of 81
should be presumptively entitled to the
pension of six dollars month, given I'M
der the dependent pension law to those
whose capacity to earn their livelihood by
manual labor has been decreased so per
cent, and that by the time the age of ~
was reached the presumption should be
that the physical disability was complete;
the age being treated as an evidential fact
in each case. This order was made in the
performance of a duty imposed upon the
president by an act of congress, which re-
quires the executive to make regulations
to govern the SubordinateS Of the pension
office in determining who are entitled to
pensions. President Cleveland had already
exercised this power by regulation which
declared that rs should be set as the age
at which total disability should be con-
clusively presumed. Similarly President
Mckinley established 65 as the age at which
half disability should be conclusively pre-
sumed. The regulation now in question,
in the exercise of the same power, supple
mented these regulations made under
Presidents Cleveland and Mckinley.
IF our opponents come into power they
can revoke this order and announce that
they will treat the veterans of 81 to 20 as
presumably in full bodily vigor and not en-
tatively state that they intend to do this ?
If so, we accept the issue. If not, then we
have the right to ask why they raise an
ture to meet
Criticisms of the administrators set
Element of the coal strike and the suit
against the Northern Securities company
are cited, and the president says:
such mutually destructive criticisms
furnish an adequate measure Of the chance
for coherent action or constructive legisla-
ton II our opponents Snould De given pow
err
Democratic Policies.
OF the policies for which the democratic
party processes to stand the president says:
$50 much for what our opponents openly
or coVertly advance in the way of an at
tack on the acts of the administration.
When we come to consider the policies for
which they profess to stand we are met
with the difficulty always arising when
statements of policy are so made that they
can be interpreted in different ways. On
some of the vital questions that have con-
fronted the American people in the last
decade our opponents take the position
that silence is the best possible way to
their lukewarm attitude Of partial &C
quiescence in what others have accom-
plished entities them to be made the Gus
todians of the financial honor and COM
mercial interests which they have but re-
Gently sought to ruin"
He reviews the history of the republican
party's efforts to establish stable national
currency, and says:
Until our opponents as a party explicit
ly adopt the views which we hold and upon
which we have acted and are acting, in the
way to keep the question from becoming
unsettled is to keep the republican party
in power
He points to the record of the admins
and labor, and carefully outlines each step
that has been taken for the enforcement
of the antitrust laws, and explains the
need Of such laws on the national statute
books in opposition to the democratic claim
that the common law, as developed, af-
fords a complete legal remedy against mo-
nopolies,' and Of this he says:
But there is no common law of the
United States. Its rules can be enforced
only by the state courts and officers. No
federal court or officer could take any
action whateve under them. It was this
fact, coupled with the inability of the states
to control trusts and monopolies, which
led to the passage Of the federal statutes
known as the Sherman antitrust act and
through the exercise of the powers con-
ferred by these acts, and by the statutes
of the last congress supplementing them,
that the national government acquires any
jurisdiction over the subject. To say that
action against trusts and monopolies
should be limited to the application of
common law Is equivalent to saying that
the national government should take no
action whatever to regulate them"
The Tariff Issues.
He charges the democrats with insin-
certify and evasiveness in their statements
regarding a tariff policy, and says:
Undoubtedly it would be possible at the
present time to prevent any Of the trusts
from remaining prosperous by the simple
expedient of making such sweeping
change in the tariff as to paralyze the in
dustries of the country. The trusts would
cease to prosper; but their smaller COM
pelilOTS WOulu ne ruined, ana the wage
workers would starve, while it would not
ket."
Continuing on the subject of the tariff, he
says:
From time to time, schedules must I'M
doubtedly be rearranged and readjusted
to meet the shifting needs Of the country
but this can with safety be done only by
the protective system. To uproot and de-
stroy that system would be to insure the
prostration. OF business, the closing of fac
tories, the impoverishment of the farmer.
the ruin or the capitalist, and the Starva-
ton of the wage worker
~ is a matter of regret that the pro-
tee tecnXe tarin policy, which, during. the
very fiber of this country, is not now ac-
cepted as definitely established. Surely
we have right to say that it has passed
beyond the domain of theory. and a right
to expect that not only it's original advo-
Gates, but those who at one time distrusted
it on theoretic grounds, should now ac-
quiesce in the results that have been proved
These 40 odd years have been the most
prosperous years this nation has ever
seen; more prosperous years than any
other nation has ever seen. Beyond ques-
ton this prosperity could not have come
If the American people had not possessed
the necessary thrift, energy and business
intelligence to turn their vast material re-
sources to account. But it is no less true
that 1t is our economic policy as regards
the tariff and finance which has enabled
us as a nation to make such good use of
the Individual capacities of our citizens,
and the natural resources Of our country
Every class of our people is benefited by
the protective tariff During the last few
years the merchant has seen the export
trade Of this country grow faster than ever
in our previous history. The manufacturer
could not keep his factory running if 4
were not for the protective tariff The
wage-worker would do we'll to remember
that If protection is robbery and is to be
to pay the penalty; for either he w will II be Be
turned adrift entirely, or his wages will be
cut down to the starvation point. AS con-
clusively shown by the bulletins of the
bureau of labor, the purchasing power of
the average wage received by the wage
worker has grown faster than the cost of
living, and this in spite Of the continual
ulated savings Of the workingmen of the