Sequachee Valley news. (Sequachee [Sequatchie], Tenn.) 1896-1952, 1904-07-07

should reveal to them all that all the
angels should say and do at his rcsurrec-
tion but only all the things Christ MIN
self had said unto him should ho bring
unto their remem OranCe (St. John Il:
26) and the spirit was TO guide them in
to all truth by speaking to them only
all Christ said (JOhnl6: Is, l4 26) and as
Christ bad never told them any thing
about how many angels should attend
his resurrection we know IL is both fol-
ly, intdelity and wickedness-prc
ing sins-to presume that tho Holy
Ghost was TO see TO II that the writer's
OF the New Testament had a batch of
"cut and dried, made up lies about
how many angels should attend Christ's
resurrection However, none of the
writer's say whether these angels we're
sitting or standing at the time of the
conversation to the women, but John
does so clearly fix the time as to when
Jesus let them know who lie was, as TO
show any fair minded person that he
does not contradict either one OF the
other writer's about what the angels
told them, for according to the others
the angels told the women Of Christ's
resurrection at their first visit to the
tomb, while John has Christ not telling
many that be was risen, as you, Mr.. G.,
so wrongly, falsely and untruthfnlly
say, but on her second trip (See John
20; l-lSl John simply has Jesus asking
Woman, why weepest thou" and say
ing to her, MARY" and Touch me
not, for am not yet assembled to my
Father; but go to my brethren. and say
unto them, ascend unto my Father,
and your Father"
This is quite different from the way
you so wrongly say 1t, for you try to
make 1t appear that Jesus told the wo-
men only what the angels did about his
resurrection, and thereby try to make
1t appear that the Bible writer's have
lied, where in fact you, Mr.. g., are the
only one who lied about it, because Je-
sus told them only of his ascension,
and not OF his resurrection, and the an
gels told them only OF his resurrection
and not OF his ascension.
6. You, Mr.. q say that you are in
cllned to the belief that Matthew lied
without proving that he did, while |
have plainly shown that you are the
one who has lied on John and Jesus as
above detailed, and that you lied about
tue new version knocking He'll out of
the Bible, and about the revision COM
mittee and now | will show you you lie
about Luke protesting to give an ac-
count of Chrlst's Whereabouts from his
christening to his death" as you false
ly say, for Luke only professed to treat
Of all that Jesus began bosh to do and
to teach, Acts /: II and did not profess
to tell anything at all about what God,
Mary and Joseph did to Him about his
whereabouts, in taking him to Egypt.
In this you falsely accuse Luke, glar-
lngly so, for any one can see that Luke
only professed in this testimony, to
treat OF Christ's doings and teachings as
a teacher, which began with Jesus only
when be was about thirty years old,
| duke 3; 23) and that Luke did not pro-
Tess to tell what was done to Jesus by
! others when he was little child.
Now, sir, these are fair samples of
| your eVulvocatiOns, Eprevarications and
lntdel quibblings, the most glaring of
which have plainly exposed, and so
| will pass by your other nonsensical,
! foolish questions, for how can anyone
tell who were the dead saints resurrect-
ed after, Christ arose, when their names
are not named in Bible. No fair mind
ed person would ask me to tell such
things, whom be we'll knows they are
not revealed in the Bible. Only "re-
vealed things belong unto US, while
secret things belong unto the Lord our
God" and their names are one of those
secret things.
honestly advise you, Mr. g., to read
better, and write more truthfully before
you accuse Bible writer's even by impli-
cation, of lying, for thou art the man"
thyself instead of them.
ST. JOHN.