The Black Hills union and western stock review. [volume] (Rapid City, S.D.) 1904-19??, 1904-09-23
the exception OF Russia. show produc-
ton by countries as follows:
THE PHILIPPINES
Republican Policy Is in Line with
Territorial Presidents.


-Four years ago the Democratic par
~ denounced the acquisition OF the Phil
ippine Islands by the United States as
dangerous form of national expansion
and their retention as an application of
miltarism. The only logical conclusion
Of this position was our immediate re-
tirement from the Islands. leaving them
10 shift for themselves. In his letter ac-
ccpting the nomination for Vice Presi-
dent in 1900 Mr.. Roosevelt commented
on this position as follows:
The simple truth is that there is moth
ing even remotely resembling imperial
ism or militarism involved in the present
development of that policy of expansion,
which has been part of the history of
America from the day when she became
nation. The words mean absolutely
nothing as applied to our present policy
in the Philippines, for this policy is only
lmpcrlalistic i'll the sense that JefferSonS
policy in Louisiana was imperialistic;
only military in the sense that Jackson
policy towards the Scminoles or Casters
towards the Sioux embodied militarsm;
and there is no more danger of its pro-
dncing evil results at home now than
there was of it's interfering with free
dom under jefferson or jackson, or in
the days of the Indian wars on the
plains.
THE only certain way of rendering
it necessary for our Republic to enter
on a career of 'militarism' would be to
abandon the Philippines to their own
tribes, and at the same time either to
guarantee stable government among
these tribes or to guarantee them against
outside interference. a far larger army
would be required to carry out any such
policy than will be required to secure
order under the American flag; while
the presence of this flag on the Islands
is really the only possible security against
outside aggression. " Properly
speaking, the question is now not whcth-
er we shall eXpand--for we have already
eNpanded-but whether we shall con-
tract"
That was the issue four years ago
Now the Democratic platform says:
I'VE believe with Jefferson and John
Adams, that no government has 4 right
to make one set of laws for those at
home and another and Il different set of
laws, absolute in their character, for
those in the colonies ;" We insist
that we ought to do for the Filipinos
what we have already done for the
Cubans."
There has never been a time since
the formation Of the government that
Congress has not made one set of laws
for the States and another set for the
territories. The laws enacted by Con-
gress for the government of the Philip
pines are no more absolute than those
| which have been enacted during the last
hundred years for our various territories.
The demand that the United States
shall do for the Filipinos what it has
done for the CubaEs is unreasonable We
| never claimed to own Cuba, but we pos
sess the Philippines by an undisputed
title. A Republican administration did
entire justice to Cuba as demanded by
the circumstances Of the case, and the
Republican party can be depended upon
to do entire justice to the Philippines