The copper era., 1904-04-28
Court Notes.

Territory vs. Cosper Smith, upon motion of District Attorney Rawlius, defendant was released upon his own recOg n izance.
 Territory vs. Thomas NaylOr ct al. The demurrer hearing was presented to the court and having fully considered, therefore the court doth order that said demurrer be sustained and the case dismissed.
 Minnie Flores vs. Jose NJ. Flores. action foc divorce. Divorce granted plaintiff.
 Cara A. Dauntless vs. H. C. Daunt- less. It is ordered that judgement be entered herein in accordance with the decree and findings.
 Territory vs. Joaquin l.. Orrantia and Ramon Cuaron, indicted for burg lary; both plead guilty.
 Territory vs. Fortunate Samaripa, indicted for forgery. Samaripa was brought into court, and sentenced $ years to the territorial prison at Yuma.
 DiOnecio Maris, who plead guilty to the crime Of grand larceny, was sen- fenced to the term Of two years in the territorial prison at Yuma.
 H. D. Keppler. l. P Campbell, AL berto Mungia and T. r. Davis ys. Paul Becker. The defendants demurrer to plaintiffs complaint was argued by counsel and submitted to the court for consideration and decision.
 Maggie GoldiEg vs. A. F. Golding, action for divorce; judgement rendered in favor of plaintiff.
 Andrew Richard Lynch. having been examined by committee appointed by the court, was admitted to be an atior- ney of this court.
 Rough A. Bovles vs. w. II. Carpen- ter, alter examination of witnesses and argument by counsel on both sides judgment was rendered for plaiutiff against defendant in accordance with the findings aud decree.
 Rough A. BOyles vs. w. H. Carpen- tar motion was made for new trial i; motion was denied and notice was then given Of appeal to the supreme court.
 Territory vs. Braulio Enriquez, Jose Acosta. Julian A costa and B. Galindo, indicted for burglary; upon motion of the district attorney, case was dis missed as regards Julian Acosta and B.. Galdino. and defendants were released from custody
 Territory vs. J. w. Brown, upon mo- of district attorney case was dismissed
 Territory vs. Jose Moreno, case tried and submitted to jury, who after de- lberating for two or three hours re- turned verdict of guilty of burglarv in the first degree. Moreno was sen teuced to twelve years in prison.
 In the case ol Preston Sims, charged with having entered the house ot Mrs. l.. C. Rupkey and committed burglary to the amount of Sl20. He was found guilty and sentenced for the term of four years, less three months service in the county jail.
 Clara Butterwick vs. Alfred Butter wick, action for divorce: upon the hear ing of testimony in the case, judge ment was rendered for the defendant. Ernest F. Larson vs. Helen C. Lar son. action for divorce; Judgemnt rem dered for plaintiff.
 Territory vs. Sabino Flores, indicted for grand larceny, was found guilty and sentenced to four years in the territorial prison.
 Territory vs. NJ. H. Mason. indicted for felony; plead not guilty. Eail bond fixed at $500 and the case con- ] tintd for the term.
 Braulo Enriquez sentenced for four years less four months service in the county jail
 The case against Isaac Coombs, who had been indicted for commit ting rape upon the person of Ida Jen- kins near Pima. was found guilty Of the crime.
 Territory vs. Francisco Mapula and ! Diouecio Jurado, indicted for murder, verdict or guilty.
 Territory vs. Sabino Guerro, in- dicted for grand larceny. Jury re- ] turned a verdict of guilty, motion for new trial was made and denied. Sen fenced for three years. Territory vs. Sabine Guerro, in- dicted for an assault with a deadly weapon: defendant withdraws plea of not guilty and enters plea Of guilty of simple assault, sentenced to serve three months in the county jail at ! Solomonyille.
 Territory vs. Parsemon Echandia, appeal from precinct No. l, not guilty.
 Territory vs. George McDaniel, in- dicted for grand larceny; motion stating variance between the evidence and the indictment the judge in- structed the jury to find a verdict oi not guilly.
 Territory vs. Francisco Mapula and Dioenicio Juardo. Motion made by attorney in a rest Of judgment be rendered against them; motion de-