The times dispatch. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1903-1914, 1904-08-25
LEAVE; CITY
TO GET REST
Mrs. Maybrick, Finding 1t I'm.
\ possible to Keep Quiet in New
York, Goes to Ellcnville.
TO KEEP up VI LITIGATION q \ l'!|t,'' |.
Her Counsel Issue Statement In,
sisting UponaHcr Claims ms l 4 q
yised Not to Visit St. Louis.
,n.c,., % The Times pispatch.)

Especial TO The Times Dispatch.) al
NEW YORK, Aug. 24.--Mrs. Maybrickl
went to Ellenville. N. W. this afternoon
accompanied by Or: Emmett Densmo'rfe
ana was driven imme diately to Cragsmoor5
Inn. where the Densmores live. 1t was
not Mrs Maybrick's intention to leave
New York at once. but so many persons tls
sent ,ip their ca rds to her at the Holland
House to day, that she realized 1t would be
Impossible to remain quiet here and ac-
nuiesced In Dr. Densmore's advice that
she at once seked the seclusion OF his
country home. tx.
An old negro, blind and tottering, vas
lied into the Holland House. By his tet1-s
year. old daughter to-day and asked i
he could see Mrs. Maybrick, for honi.
Iihe said. he had worked for years as a
servant about her home In Norfolk. Va
Word was sent down that she could m OF
be seen. When the negro. who said ne
was Church Archbell and that he lived
at No. 1O4 West Twenty fourth Street.
lea rned this. he began to cry, his daugh.3
tier comforting him. A crowd gathered
around Archbell In the lobby.
To Resume Litigation.
Mr.. Hayden said that when the Virginia
law courts resumed lin the fall, the liti-$
ga ton for the recovery OF Mrs. May,
bricks property would be vigorously
LenS ,It,. n: .yye intend to show up the
conspiracy by which Mrs Maybrick and nc
her mother have & been induced to part
wit their interest In a great estate. we
will show that Mrs. NJ ay brick Was III y. q
3duced to Sign deeds. while she was IN n
court awaiting tile decision q her 81, h i! 3
bands death and gain In prison so. a Wn i,
she was & Il a state Of mental and physical
collapse D following her cond emna at ton
Statement of Counsel
| Al essrs. HI yden and 1arrell, counsel
for Mrs. Maybrick. have prepared "a state stat 4
ment IN which they ga 81: .s $t
Armstrong; attorneys and himself. having
no \ possible defense to the facts PROV ~
fall +. sna ~
ii 4 tement OF the bill and get permission
81 the court upon the argument Of that re ser.
walton thelr ansWer ana se1 10
file their pleas In abatement. and ~
ground OF the plea and demurrer being that
swoma !, i and 4 had no right to bring the suit
,inder8th laws I'M force In the state OF
ginia at the time Of her maria q hephe g.
TONG were I'LL to the pleas and there the
matter rested until q last fall, AWAITING birss
IMaybrick' s re- ease testify in the ca se.A
certified t,rs n, tes
l3tiInony Itself drawn. from thu court. are
lIocked In a safe In the office OF Hayden g
In that suit copy II an option was filed
lin the handwrit ting Of Mr. Arrnstrons. exc
euted almost two years an =. me oeeas
Roques. the Baron yon# Roques and others
had been got by Armstrong. 7 his option was
c sknGd es = Won Roques. Armstrong repre-
sented himself at all timex as the a torneys
OF the Baroness Won Roques IN selling thu
and Others ~ They paid Il him SIS 900 in cash.
81, 900 In this country and a stn1a ~ amour
In England. for the lands embrace d ins that
st John Boyle. OF Louisville. Ky..& attorneyS
for the Kentucky Union Land Comps tes-5
titled he
BY them from Armstrong, and that Armst rong
represented to him and to his people at all
baroness Won RoqueH. with reversion In Mrs
Maybrick and q her children to an interest
he
s thss hsrrssaP
title. Boyle refused to take title from Groome
and required rmstrong a to 4 file q friendly
bill in the United Il States Circuit CourtSat8
louisville Ito appoint trustees lin $$ Kentucky
to pass the title. and made the Baroness Won
Roques, Mrs. Maybrick and her husband y and
Mrs ayhrick.s two infant children parties
king the sale by The trustees, and Mr.. ARM
strong secured deeds directly to the sforty-
Roaues. Mrs. Maybrick and the trustees to
the Kentucky Union Land Company; a. non-i
inal consideration being mentioned In the
alton 10 Mrs. Maybrick or Ethe Baroness Won
Roques. The Kentucky Union ]; Land Company,
BY the
strons. after receiving the deeds $4,000 for
e sns nSa'S sSdense
letters received from Armstrong while Mrs.
t1s
money for Mrs. Maybrick's defense. and ex-
pressed his absolute conf dence In these let.
q The original OF all the above testimony may
be seen I'M the Office Of Hayden 8 Yarrell. at
Washington, by any member OF the press. tss
Paid $1,000, Not SIS 700.
& YarrelI also subject TO Inspection, ARM
strong represented to- the Baroness Won Roques
that various other sales he had been neEotia,
been sent from, then, TO him. 4 executed & to-
Groome, who was represented q as the pur-
chase, tor .9
for her title to the above named lands, and
under her contract with him. h he would set
been employed In 1878 and 1879 as attorney for
the baroness Won Roques and Mrs ayhrlck.f
IA copy OF this contract lis in the hands OF her
}attorneys@ and a copy was filed In the suit.
Out OF this sS5,ooo, 50, 900 was paid to Mr..
Potter for Baroness Won Roaues and Mrs.
" It has developed that within the last year
that. An 1885, almost a year prior the time
that Armstrong b was heseechinE 81. John
that Mrs Mayhrck might have money proper
IS to conduct her defense, he had sold to q
worth, Of b or property nnde one OF the deeds 10
his dummy Groome, no. mention Of which
sale was ever made to Mrs, NJ aybrick orlthe
purchase money ever paid 10 her While they
90 no. Wish 70 try their case pvt q court
H. Mrs Mayhrlsk ha s1a no Interest In this land
be necessary 2 The fact 10. Mrs. Maybrick, I'M
dor the will 3nf her grandfather Darius Hol-&
If a