Evening times-Republican. [volume] (Marshalltown, Iowa) 1890-1923, 1904-10-14
DISTRICTS VOTES COMPARED.

DISTRICTS VOTES COMTAhGD.
A careful study Of the above table
reals the following facts relative to the
stay-at-homa vote in the different dis
tricts:
First district-The republicans in
1903 cast 1883 votes for governor III
excess Of the number cast by them for
congressman in 1902, and S26 more
than they cast for governor in 1901,
while they, cast 1920 less votes in 1908
than they did for congressman in 1900.
The democrats in 1903 cast 564 more
votes for governor than they did III
1902 for congressman, and LOIS more
than they did in 1901 for governor, ana
4,70S less than they cast for congress
man in 1900.
Second district-Republican in 1908
cast 1857 more votes than they did
for congressman in 1902, LAPS more
than they did for governor in 1901, and
3.26S less than for congressman In
1900. For congressman in 1902 they
cast 1857 less votes than they did
for governor last fall, and ISL more
than they did for governor in 1901, but
their vote was 1883 less than they
gave for congressman in 1900. In 1902
when Mr.. Wade, the democratic cam
didate for congress, was elected, the
republican candidate for secretary OF
state, Mr.. Martin, carried the district
by 1893 plurality, receiving 1928 votes
to 1886 votes for his competitor. AT
the same election the republican can
didate for congress received 1857
votes. or 592 votes less than were given
Mr.. Martin, and the democratic candi-
date received 1885 votes, or 959 votes
more than were given at the same time
to the head Of the democratic state
ticket.
THE democrats of this district cast in
1902, 1851 more votes than they gave
their candidate for governor last year.
and 3,215 more than they cast for gov
ernor in 1901, while they only fell 1,9l2
votes behind the number they polled
for their candidate for congress in
1900.
Third district-The republicans in
1903 cast 1893 votes more than they
did for congressman in 1902, 1885 more
than they did for governor In 1901,
and 6688 less than they did for con-
gresham In 1900.
The democrats in 1903 cast sS5 less
votes than they did for governor In
1902, and 1888 more than for governor
In 1901 and 1880 less than for congress
in 1900.
Fourth district-The republicans in
1903 cast 1929 more votes than for
congressman in 1902, 1,640 more than
for governor In 1901, and 1886 less
than for congressman in 1900.
The democrats in 1903 cast $50 less
votes than for congressman in 1902, l.
448 more than for governor in 1901,
and 1856 less than for congressman
in 1900.
Fifth district-The republicans in
1908 cast 667 more votes than for con-
gresham in 1902. 1,o01 more than for
governor in 1901, and 6,941 less than
for congressman in 1900.
The democrats in 1903 cast S39 more
votes than for congressman In 1902,
2,579 more than for governor in 1901,
and 1854 less than for congressman in
1900.
Sixth district-The republicans in
1908 cast ISIS more votes than for
congressman in 1902, 233 more than for
governor in 1901, and 1910 less than
for congressman in 1900.
The democrats in 1908 cast 2,105 less
votes than for congressman In 1902.
S73 more than for governor in 1901,
and 1902 less than for congressman in
1900
Seventh district--The republicans in
1903 cast 1.Sl7 more votes than for
congressman in 1902, 80 less than for
governor in 1901, and 1854 less than
for congressman in 1900.
The democrats In 1903 cast 2o5 less
votes than for congressman in 1902,
1,116 more than for governor in 1901,
and 6,7O6 less than for congressman in
1900.
Eighth district-The republicans in
1909 cast III more votes than for con-
gresham in 1902, 1872 more than for