The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1904-10-12

/ bezzlement. and asked that the judge
instruct the witness not to say any
thing that would ineriminate him.
Exhibits c. D E and F were shown
| the witness, who identified Boyd's sig
nature on each document.
/ The Davis receipt and check were
shown the witness.
Did you have anything TO do with
that bill ~
IT was sent down to Davies & Co, TO
| collect that bill from Davies. I pre-
| scented that bill. which was receipted
at that time by Mr.. Boyd. Davies &
| Co, presented me with a check. I
| brought the check to the Office, put my
signature TO it, took it down to the
bank and cashed it. then returned
with the money to the Office and turn
ed ii over to Mr.. Boyd
did any one instruct you to cash
| that check2'
"who had charge Of the combination
to the safe in September, 1890, TO
March, 1902
There are two combinations-one to
the outside safe and one to the inside
door I had the combination to the
| outside, and Mr.. Boyd had the COM
bination to the inside door. I paid
over all moneys to Boyd"
Cross-examination by Mr.. Chilling
worth.
You are charged. Mr.. Mahaulu, with
a series of stealings from the govern
ment, are you not inquired Mr..
| Chfllingworth.
| Attorney General Andrews was on
his feet in an instant with an objec-i
! ton, and asked the court to protect
| the witness from such questions. The
objection was sustained. Mr.. Chill
! lingworth said he desired merely to
test the credibility of the witness.
you got check from Davies &
| Co.. pursued the attorney.
yes, SIR
what did you do with it?''
IT took it to the office"
What else after that?"
| 81 took it and stamped it with the
| Office stamp and then attached my sig
nature to it. 1 then went down town
and got the money
WAS Boyd in the Office when you
stamped the check?"
He was He had told me. that all
drafts and checks payable to bearer /
| could attach my signature and get
! them cashed.'
Did you tender your services as a
witness in this case against Mr..
Boyd?''
mo, sir, was subpoenaed."
'swhen?''
"Today"
Then ensued considerable parIey
over Mahaulu having gone to Davies
| to identify his signature on the check
and receipt, it being finally shown,
however, that Mahaulu had not been
asked to do so, except by his own at
| torney, and voluntarily offering to do
SO for the attorney general on Monday.
1.-The whole matter was to see wheth-
er 1 had the money or Mr.. Boyd said
| Mahaulu finally" But I know that
| Mr.. Boyd had that money" This was
| said with emphasis.
| Territorial Auditor Fisher was called
| to the stand, but at this point the
court adjourned until $50 this morn
ing.
COURT NOTES.
The Little Joker Tobacco" case was
on hearing nearly all day in Judge
Gears court yesterday.
Henry Smith, administrator of the
estate of Kekie Amara, has filed an in
ventory of the estate showing realty in
1
land portion being under an annual
rental of 5000 and household furniture
| Defendant in the case of The Portu-
guese Mutual Benefit Society VS.. Mary
Ann Kahanamakai has filed a general
denial to plaintiffs declaration
! Charles Phillips, administrator of the
estate of Henry Congdon, deceased, has
filed notice that he viii present his
| rAT1rl1 n q nf fat re- do
order of court, on October Il, at $50
a. m.
| Defendant German Savings Bank of
| San Francisco has filed a demurrer to
| the complaint of plaintiff in the fore
| closure mortgage case of Sister Alder
| tina VS.. Prince David, Prince Kuhio,
ct al. making a general denial.
| Defendant in the ejectment case of
Samuel Sayidge, trustee VS.. Mary Ber-
tlemann has filed demurrer and al
leges that the plaintiffs declaration is
| ambiguous, in that it does not state
what title, or what character of title
in the land is claimed by the plaintiff.
| The defendant asks that the case be
dismissed. Frank Bertlemann makes
a similar answer.
NJ. T. Simonton, as principal, with
| J. F. Morgan. as surety has filed a
bond in the sum of $4,000 as Commits
sioner in the foreclosure of mortgage
proceedings of H. Hackfeld & Co, Ltd,
| VS.. w. c. Achi, Kapiolani Estate, w.
r. Castle and J. NJ. Monsarrat.
| A deficiency judgment has been or
dered by Judge Robinson against de-
PENDANTS in the case of the First Amer
lean Savings Bank vs.. Mary j. and A.
A Montana, for S1S99
Defendant in the case of Mary Buckle
VS.. S. Ahmi has filed a general denial
to plaintiffs declaration. The defense
intimates it will rely upon the statute
of limitation to prove its case.