Bisbee daily review., 1904-02-10
1. zeckendorf
 oF TUCSON Wants Accounting
FULL RECITAL OF AFFAIRS BE-
 TWEEN zEckENooRF AND STEINFELp. =.
Former Claims SteinfeId Has Divested Partnership Monies-Wants Settle ment of Affairs and Appointment of Reeeiver-Compsaint Covers Four teen Pages.


 Saturaay attel noon at a late hour a >o4nplalnl MAS neio in lne cIeIKs Or ace IA ~AIen Louis AecAe..ooI4 ap-
 .,oals as p.aInGu anC AiOert Stein -eiI as ue.elNaiit- lne pIa-nun la
 ,As aDUye enii,ied acuOn aI.es.s: mat on oiank Gay or L,ecember 1sso, plaiuIin ana uelenDanl e..IS4 S>.
 .Dto MrIl,en arueles O. eo-pa4tn
 sAlp uuAer tne nm nanIe u L. Dock
 e4luorI & ,o., Tor uie u ansaN Li.n O. d
 OuslnesS or DuyIGg ana seliing real
 ..rvperty, lIues aHc nIiu.uS pl opert,
 >atI4e, slocK oI oInec cOrl-UGaSINDs
 anu or ope.aln mines ana [olng o.n-
 tucson, Pima county, Arizona; that
 .-IalnuH paIa mo Sad Dus4neSs the
 suIn of oI.45l.vl ana deIenuant paid
 n slo5, ,Vv5.oo; unuer tue sa4o cO-p.ar.-
 --ersnIp It was agreed mat Ine plOnLs
 L sad business shOulo be dlvided, 50
 ger cent 70 pialntIn and 40 per cent
 70 deIenoant, but that the caplLal O.
 sad Dusiness at all times to be owned
 0y plainutf and de4enoant in propor-
 Lon 10 the amounts each had paid in;
 terms of copartnershIp proglGeI tor dissolution of same at any tune by either party giving to the other six
 months' notice in writing; that six months prior to commencement ot thls action plaintiff served upon defendant notice in writing of dissolution or said and by virtue of the provisions Of said articles and oi sald notice is now dissolved.
 That the mercantile business has been conducted in the name o1 L. & Co.,; that the real estate acouired by the firm has been taken in the name Albert Steinfeld; that certain mines, corporation stocks ana other properties belonging and ac- ouired by said firm have been taAeh in the name of A. Steinfeld; that saiu has been, during the co-part- rership, the resident managing part ner of the firm and was paid a special salary of $500 ger month by the firm and as said managing partner had full and complete control and manage ment of the firm, books and accounts and of employees thereof.
 Plaintiff and defendant cannot agree. as set forth later, as to best method of winding up affairs of the liquidating said busi- ness, realizing assets and collecting debts que and of paying debts owned by the firm; defendant desires busi- ness continued, all income of sales of property of business be put back into the business, that the same may not that plaintiff demands business be wound up, liquidated and particularly of the lack cf plaintiff now has in defend ant, as set forth later; that due set clement be made in assets being con verted into money, debts collected and profits, if any, divided, 55 per cent to the plaintiff and 45 per cent to the that unless the court ap- point a receiver to take charge of said business a large proportion of said firms properties will be wasted and lost, plaintiff suffering thereby great loss and damage for which he will have no remedy or relief by law, loss and damage on the contrary being ir- reparable.
 That during the years of co-partner- ship, dating from December, 1893, de fendant has for his convenience taken the real property purchased and be- longing to the firm in his own name besides large mining blocks of mining stock and cattle and other corporations, all of which belonged to the firm; that plaintiff has been informed and be- lieves and on such information and belief, alleges the fact to be that books and accounts do not show all the transactions in which said man. ager and partner has been engaged.
 The plaintiff recites that deals of defendant in mines, cattle and stocks have not been fully turned to account or said copartnerships, all involving large sums of money not being ac- counted to said firm. The plaintiff alleges that the copartnership has been defrauded by transactions made by the defendant managing partner in his own name; that defendant has never rendered to plaintiff a true and just account of his trusteeship of the co-partnership and moneys invested by plaintiff in his own name and in the names of others. -.
 The plaintiff, in his complaint, states wherein the moneys have been from bn hr,cfxorc.