The Baltimore County union. [volume] (Towsontown, Md.) 1865-1909, 1903-12-12

Hon. DGUad F0a0ter, Chaef Judge; Hon. ~. ChdS
B'rse, associate sei, y.dgs John e., Gras0n'
p. Cole, Esq, Clerk, James
Rittenhouse, Esq, Sheriff.
TowsoN, December THE December term of
the Circuit Court commenced today. The juries
for the term are constituted as follows:
GRAND JURY. PETIT JURY
Charles r. v. Myers, Stephen J. Welsh,
Foreman, William Holman,
Edward H. Kendall, John A. Bhlers,
John X. Murphy, Charles A. Hook,
Frederick z. Abel, George W. Uhler,
Michael ]. Haney, George +. Naylor,
William H. Clagett ]. Best Ole,
William Bryan, NicholasJ. Cotter,
Patrick j. Roche, Robert D. Davis,
Joseph Ritter, Thomas Elliott
Charles M. Culison, Benz. +. Jordan, Jr.,
Thomas e. Bolinger, William s. Ceilings, 4
William F. Rutledge, William II. Kone, d
Daniel Kearns, Charles Francis
Edward G.. Wheeler, EdwardJ. Stork,
Leander Foreman, Dixon Brown, Il
]. Badger Brown, Harry w. Baldwin,
Henry DeBaugh, Marion Sherman,
Cuttings Wilson, August Weis, ?
William H. Hotter, Michael Adams,
Lawrence Nolan, George Schlaffer,
John G. Erdman, August w. Miller
Thomas B. Todd, George Quick of p,
William ID. Meek. MOrdecai Schaeffer, >
Martin ]. Meyers.
In his charge to the Grand Jury Judge Burke
said: You must recognize the fact that it is a.
serious matter to charge anyone with crime
and place that charge on the criminal dOckets.,
This is more especially true when such charge
comes from body of men such as you are You
must remember, too, that you are an -parte'
body, and that you only hear the case of the
State. Therefore, it is your duty to dismiss such
cases as are brought before you which are not
the oath you have taken requires secrecy, and
this is a necessary element of your duties. The
test of the value of your services seems to be
not so much the number of cases which you
place on the Docket but the sound judgment
and good sense you display in dealing with the
cases before you. OF cases coming before grand
juries large portion originate in private resent
ment spite and jealousy, and another class of
and are a needless expense to the county"
The several dockets were called and the follow
ing disposals made:
Groom and George Groom, trading as Harry
Groom Il Bro, $235.6S; The Standard Brewery
Co. VS.. Frederick East SIP; H. Valentine Walt
Adams & Co.. vs.. B. T. Spencer, $114S9 The
Warder Bushnell & Glessner Co. VS.. Horace
SSRgu snd q Ann NJ Srgl9 SSst sSo JOEL 9s
Griffith & Turner Co. vs. David F. Stocksdale
$24989; GOttleib Bauernschmidt-S traus Brew
s2s4Os. 70 N''''''' -io'1' anu ''a 'lea'''
Settled-Margaret A. Lydecker VS.. John A.
Williams, William Seymour vs.. William James,
]. M. Christopher VS.. Adrian Iseln. same vs.
same, David Hookvs Sarah Keller and Joseph
F. Keller and Daniel Rider VS.. Geo. W. Ewing.
Default with Leave Shrewsbury Savings In
stitution VS.. Noah Lloyd, Samuel Lloyd and H.
F. Alban, Martha w. Brown VS.. Chesapeake and
Potomac Telephone Co. of Baltimore city,
Meister and Heinrich G. Tieck.
Dismissed-D. NJ. Osborne Co. vs.. William H.
Enrich, garnishee, etc.
Removed-Peter Gerst VS.. the County Com
missioners of Baltimore county, Jacob Gerst VS..
same, William G. Dorsey vs. United Railways
and Electric Co., Elizabeth Carter VS.. same and
the Edmondson Avenue. Gainesville and Elicott
City Electric Railway of Baltimore county
Non Pros.-David w. Fellows VS.. Eldridge E.
King and John A. Murray vs.. William j. Green,
John Green, Herbert Gorsuch, Andrew ]. Ger
man. Harry g. Hutchins and the County Com
missioners of Baltimore county.
Condemnation Nisi-Hoopes & Radford vs..
Charles Hoffheiser
TUESDAY, Dec. 8.-Magistrates' appeals: Jacob
List vs. Randolph r. Ware and wife, defendants
appeal from Justice Luers; judgment below for
plaintiff for $5470; motion to strike out judg-
ment as against Mrs. Ware sustained and judg
ment affirmed as against Randolph r. Ware.
Mrs. Gertrude A. Ochs VS.. Martin L. Ochs,
George Ochs and wife and William Ochs, defend
ants appeal from Justice Perrie; judgment be-
low for plaintiff for restitution of the possession
of premises 908 West Boundary avenue and 81. Al
costs; appeal dismissed.
James M. Boyd vs.. Sallie Day and Albert Day,
her husband, defendants appeal from Justice
Clements; Judgment below for plaintiff for
$2092; judgment of non pros. and Judgment be-
low reversed without prejudice.
John Riggs Brown VS.. County Commissioners
of Baltimore county, defendants appeal from
Justice Bone; judgment below for plaintiff for
500 debt and $4.70 costs; on trial before jury.
WEDNESDAY, Dec. 9.-John Riggs Brown vs..
the County Commissioners of Baltimore county;
before reported verdict for the defendant.
Victor M. Presson vs.. Edward Petzold plain
tins appeal from Justice Whiteley; Judgment
below for defendant for costs; Judgment af-
firmed.
THURSDAY, Dec. 1O.-Magistrates appeals:
Jacob. Peters vs.. Henry LIE Brun; defendants
appeal from Justice Ray; judgment below for
s7 siS.in i0f S'0'''' Vero''' i0r pian'ln '0r
Same VS.. same, defendants appeal from same
Justice judgment below for plaintiff for SOL;
verdict for plaintiff for 1922