West Virginia argus. [volume] (Kingwood, W. Va.) 1877-1946, 1903-09-24

ordered that the defendants recover from
the plaintiff their costs
l.. A. McPeck VS.. wiibert Llston. cause
dismissed and Il Is ordered that the
plaintiff pay the defendant his costs
Florence Taylor VS.. Geo. A. Taylor.
Order OF attachment issued against Geo
A. Taylor returnable forthwith.
Henry Mckinney vs.. Anne Mckinney
Notice docseted and continued until next
term.
James H. Hurshman VS.. WIN. II. stafford
Defendant demurred which was oyer-ruled,
therefore the defendant files his plea In
writing In his answer TO the bill OF the
plaintiffs TO which plea and answer the
plaintiff replies generally.
George a. Walls VS. Charles Y. Bishop.
Decree for sale.
Sherman G. Devail VS. Matte v. Devall.
Divorce granted and the defendant award.
cd the care Of the son. Harry Devaii. aged
about three years.
A. L. Delaney s. Bro. vs. Joseph A. Miller
ct al. Dismissed satisfied.
The Cecil Shoe Co. ct al VS. z. w. Spack.
man et al. Cause dismissed.
Rebecca Calcamp VS. Lulu NJ. Caicamp
Decree for sale. NJ j. Fortney appointed
special commissioners TO make deed and
join with the plaintiff in making deed. Sale
made and confirmed.
Mary Huber. guardian. VS. James Huber
| infant. The sale confirmed.
Cyrus Shaftcr VS. Emily Shafer ct al.
The Court orders that the defendants exc.
cute proper deed to the plaintiff.
w. W. Shoch VS. Rightmeyer & Smoot
The defendant James X. Smoot demurred
aud the demurrer was argued by counsel
defendant James r. Smoot files answer
which Is not deemed sufficient. and the de.
PENDANT Is given twenty days to file full
answer.
]. w. Flynn & Co VS. w. G. Brown. The
defendant w. G. Brown tenders his answer.
which, by leave OF the Court. Is fled. TO
which answer the plaintiff replies generally.
And therefore the Briery Mountain Coal Co.
by its counsel. p. j. Crogan. tenders pc.
tition and asks to be made a party defen-
dant In this cause. which said petition was
filed.
d. F, Fawcett VS.. Blue Ridge oil and De.
velopment Co. Defendant files bill and
plaintiff replies generally and the defend
ants. Florence l.. ". Marsden, Floss l..
Marsden and Mabel Marsden, by their
counsel. tender their joint answer to the
bill OF the plaintiff. Leave Is granted the
plaintiff to Gle special replication.
Thomas ] Watson's admir- vs. Thomas !
Watson's heirs ct al. Supplemental report
filed by c e Pierce and r w Monroe. spe
cial commissioners heretofore appointed to
make sale Of real estate OF the decedent.
Thomas ] Watson. by which report 1t APP
pears that after the sale heretofore made
by the said commissioners. II was brought
to their attention that the said decedeni
was the owner of a sixteen-acre tract OF
land. which they are ordered to sell upon
the same terms and conditions as pre-.
scribed and directed In the former decree.
Sale made and confirmed.
Leroy Shaw. guardian. VS. Orvsi ] Ster-
estate.
John c Plum VS. ] L Mckenzie. The
plaintiff granted leave to file bill. which
was done and the cause was remanded to
rules.
Briery Mountain Coal Co. VS. NJ N Tay-
lor's heirs ct al. Deed ordered made to
the plaintiff and ] Crogan appointed a
special commissioner to execute the deed
S B Elkins VS. Marshall King. Cause re-
handed 10 rules with leave to plaintiff to
amend his bills and sue out process there
on.
S. b. Elkins VS.. Marshal King. Same
order as above.
S B. Elkins VS. Virginia b. Bird same
order as above.
S. B. Elkins VS. Walter Collins ct al
Same order as above.
S. b. Elkins VS. David B. Johnson. Same
order as above.
S. b. Elkins VS. Samuel Forman ct al
Same order as above.
S. B. EIkins VS. c. G Graham ct al. Same
order as above.
Nellie Kelly VS. Clyde Kelly, Defendant
ordered to pay the plaintiff forty dollars to
prosecute this suit. This suit is for
divorce and alimony.