The times dispatch. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1903-1914, 1903-04-10

join In decryiny q man who was DOWN
He did not think the people desired any
further punishment than that Of censure
and fe appealed In behalf Of the family
BoG the accused Judge for the adoption OF
his substitute.
Loud cheering greeted Mr.. Folkes' re-
marks, and his substitute was rejected.
ayes, II; noes. So. tilig
Those voting in the affirmative wore:
Messrs. Coleman. Cummn. EDWARDS.
&Tolkes, Goodwin, Walter Jordan. Kelley,
Leake, Mays, Moore. Owens, stearnes.
5ward-17. 53i45 ss$
&, ANOTHER DEFEAT. +. 5
Mr.. Leake offered further resolution
6mittee to report to the House whether
or not Judge Campbell should be impeach7
ed upon the evidence already and hereaf-
ter to he taken.sS This was rejected and
Mr.. Green explained his position and
gave his reasons for his vote againstS the
report OF the committee He thought the
findings Of the committee were incon-
sistent and In conflict with each n. other
He desired to know when Virginia
Judge should, be a detective and when
he should not be.
Mr.. Duke spoke briefly and declared
that there had been no conflict IN the
findings Of the minority. and Mr.. Davis
arose to reply to inquiries made Of him
by various members.
A STRONG STATEMENT,
He desired to close the debate for the
report, and would prefer that the speak
ing on the other side should proceed
first. No one seemed to care 10 SPEAK,
and MIR. Davis proceeded to defend the
report In an able manner. 5Sjs3 a
He declared upon the start that he
IN 70 o. M
4 great many inquiries. MIR. Davis de-
Tended the action OF the committee and
declared that the body had proceeded IN
an entirely constitutional manner and IN
strict accord with precedents.
!; He refuted the point made BY Mr..
sL.en|e that notice was required before
instead of after the evidence was taken,
and he invoked the Constitution IN his
support.
MIR, Davis contended that Judge Camp
! bell had had all the notice any one couio
desire, and that he had been given full
and fair trial.
ADOPTED IN A WTIIRL
The argument OF the member from Pc
tersburg was purely a legal one, and ne
declared III the outset that ne had no
personal interest in the case, ana Wou VIZ.
deal solely with the evidence, and nc
stuck strictly to his declaratlon. n. (, clteu
ns 'sprcccdents nearly every similar case
tried in virginia, and he went Into details
fns "a each. comparing them all with the
one in point.
M, Cumming called the pending cues
F+ion. and IL required upon the adoption OF
4the resolutions of the committee, ana the
roll call upon them resulted as follows: 4
Il Aves-Messrs, Allen, Angel. Arm
strong. G, Conway Baker. w. W. Baker
RANKS, Biscoe, Charles T. Bland, George
g. Blsnd, Boaz, Bowman Branch, Cuh-
fna6ay. Cabel, Cardwell, Gator, Chrlst't!h
5C,hurchman. Davis. Dudley, DUKE Eariy,
GE,dnlondson, ELAN. Featherston' puiton'
Gardner, Garrett, Gent, George, 1raVels,
Hnrnlan, lIcermans. HOFFMAN. {liuH, Jeh-
nings, Lacy, Lasster, Lawson. Lee, Lion,
r ,owrv I,yell, Mort, Murrell, Newhousc,
!Nottinghnm, organ, OVERLY, Powers.
spurdy. Reynolds, Rice, Robson. sebrell,
sine. blackburn Smith. snead, Stafford,
5Turpln Walker. West and whitehead
E--63 5iS4sI 5st
f Noes-Alessrs. Coleman. cumming. nd-
wards. Folkes, Green Hunley. Walter
Jordan. Kelley, Leake, Lewis, Mays,
owens, Stearnes. Taylor, Toney Wallace,
Ware and Woodard-1s. 5
6 "A ONLY ON1D PAIR
X Only ono pair was announced It having
been that Of Mr.. j. w, Smith, Of Lee,
with Mr.. Carter. OF Scott. II the latter
had been present he would hove voted
mo- and Mr.. Smith would have voted
H'tAye" II ls,1-
Messrs, Read Of Mecklenburg, and
Barham. OF surry. 4 stated that being
new members, they,A had refrained from
voting on the question. as they did not
feel that they were sufficiently informed
to vote intelligently. t
When these statements had been made
tho House, at . p. NJ. adjourned until
40 o'clock to-day. F ttSatM5