The Ely miner. [volume] (Ely, Minn.) 1895-1986, 1903-11-06
Council Proceedings.
Continued from First Page.)

lows: lot 3, 1921; lot 4, 1892; lot 5,
1892.
For sidewalk along the south side
of block west of block 5, in the origin
al plat of Ely cost .$27.26. The lots
abutting thereon are lots /. and 8.
Lot should be assessed S1l.75; lot 2.
$11.75; lot 3, 1915.
For sidewalk along the west side of
First avenue, between Chapman and
Harvey streets and between Harvey
and Conan streets, and along the
north and south sides of Harvey
street, between First avenue and
First avenue west cost S496.34. The
lots abutting thereon are lots to Z
inclusive in block 81, In the original
plat of Ely, 6 to 10 inclusive in block
6, Semers addition to Ely, 1 to 6 in
elusive in block %. in the original
| plat of Ely. to inclusive in block I,
Semer's addition to Ely, to inclu
sive block 20. in the original plat of
Ely and l to inclusive in block 20,
in the original plat of Ely. The
amount to be assessed TO each lot is as
follows: For the sidewalk along the
east side of block 81, original plat of
Ely. Lot l. $2O.12: lot 2, S7.47; lot 3,
S7.4S; lot 4, S7.47; lot 5, S7.48; lot 6
$7.48.
For the sidewalk between First
avenue and First avenue west. on the
south side of block 81, in the original
plat of Ely, and south side of block 6,
in Semer's addition to Ely, lot /,
block 81. S12.1l; lot 2, block 81, S12.11:
lot 8, block q, Sl2.12; lot 4, block 81,
$l2.11; lot 5, block 81. $I2.ll; lot 6,
block q, $l212: lot Z, block q. S4.04;
in block 6, lot 10, s2O1S; lot 9. sl2. IL;
lot 8, $I21l; lot I, Sl2.11; lot 6. $12.12.
For the sidewalk along the north
side of block %, in the original plat of
Ely. Lot /. S12.11; lot 2, Sl2.1l; lot 3,
S12.12; lot 4, SILL; lot 5. $l2.11; lot
6, S12 II.
For the sidewalk along the north
side of block I, Semer's addition to
Ely. Lot 1, $I2.1I; lot 2, $l211. lot
3, S12.l2: lot 4, Sl211; lot 5, S12.l1;
lot 6, $l212
For the sidewalk along the east
side of block %, original plat of Ely,
lot l. $20.12; lot 2, $7.47; lot 3, $7.48;
lot A, $7.47; lot S, s7.4S; lot 6, s7.4S.
For the sidewalk along the east side
of block 20, original plat of Ely, it is
shown that four different people have
bought the first four lots in this block
and by deeds between themselves
they have re-arranged them and each
owns quarter of the property adjacent
to the frontage of the sidewalk along
this avenue. It is therefore recon-
mended that the cost of this sidewalk
be assessed to the first four lots in
said block and each of the said parties
to pay an eqnal share OF the same,
being SLABS each.
For the sidewalk along the east side
Of block 20, original plat of Ely cost
$685.. IL. 1t is shown that Andrew
Watilo who owns IS feet of the rear
end of lot in said block did build at
his own expense So feet of sidewalk,
and that therefore he should not be
liable for any of the expense of con-
structing the remainder of said side
walk. OF the sum of 1912. the re-
naming 60 front feet of said lot /,
should pay sl1.59; lot 2, $3.50; lot 8,
4.31; lot 4, $3.50; lot 5, s43l; lot
6. s4.31.
Alderman Grabowsky moved that
the reports of the,city clerk showing
sidewalks constructed and the lots
liable to a special tax to defray the
expense of such construction, together
with the amount to be assessed ag-
ainst each lot, be accepted and filed.
The motion was supported by Alder
man Portllan and carried by vote of
Council. Yeas, four. Nays. none.
The following resolution was pre-
sented by Alderman Grabowsky:
Whereas, the City Council of the
City of Ely. did heretofore order that
sidewalk be constructed along the
line of the streets and avenues upon
which the lots hereinafter described
do Adult, at the expense OF the ow-
ners thereof, and the proper notice
having been issued by the clerk and
duly published, ordering said side
walks to be constructed within the
time limited herein after the publica-
tion thereof, and the property ow-
ners owning property abutting upon
said streets and avenues hereinafter
described, having failed to construct
said sidewalks, within the time limit
ed by said notice, and the city having
constructed the same.
Now therefore, be it resolved, that
the Council do declare the expense Of
said construction upon each lot or
part of lot, to be as hereinafter
| stated. and that the same be assessed