The St. Louis Republic. [volume] (St. Louis, Mo.) 1888-1919, 1903-05-20
nlinoi. Appellate Court.

| REPUBLIC SPECIAL.
Springfield H.. May 1s-Proceedngs were had
! In the Appellate Court. Third District, to-day a:
follows:
Maplewood Coal Company vs. Phillips: petition
by appeilan; for appeal and certificate of i'm
Giliet, VS.. Giett: petition by Charlotte L
Barnes for appeal to Supreme Court allowed.
bond in the sum Of $50 to be filed in twenty
days
american Insurance Company vs. walston: mo-
additional recori. abstracts and briefs allowed
time extended to second day Of this term.
Long ct al. VS.. the People: motion by plain
allowed.
Patterson rs. Patterson: motion by defendant
70 DISMISS writ OF error; cross motion by plain
stanter: cross motion allowed.
Lossdon VS.. Logsdon; plaintiffs submit security
f's sGlT nefssL ys motion by pun
for leave file abstract and briefs instantsr al
TO e ten .0f dsss
granted: motion by defendant dismiss writ of
error and for rule plaintiff to give security FOR
Perry e. al. vs., Bozarth e, al: motion by
peal in accordance with mandate OF supreme
Court; motion allowed and appeal dismissed:
to make T. H Montague l p party , defendant and
to continue said cause for service; suggestions
to dismiss wit OF error ana in the alternative for
n to OF Give e ssly Sc @ for costs for s
/ by plaintiff an opposition TO dsienoant's motion
+ Raftery vs.. Easley: motion by plaintiff for e1-
tension OF ;ime TO tile abstracts and briefs al
and briefs sf a0r aowed TO s
submits security for cGsts; security approved.
Short by Sy appellant
Big Four vs Cline: motion by appellant for
leave to submit cau,e on abstracts and briefs not
lowed.
supreme Tent. Knights OF Maccabees. VS.. Mar
shall motion for centinuance allowed
rule plaintiff to give security for costs; motion
by plaintiff for leave t9 submit cause on abstracts
aa ps5y 6ra9. n5 ns for leave to amend abstracts
Murray V. Brickner; motion by appellee to
sehu,e @ Menke sn0s ct a motion by appel
liant for fifteen days s esxten,ion of time to file
for r. centnuance q allowed. oA -"0'''n '' appe''A
; abstracts ana briefs not in Conformity with
lee d4 a q Ha ms ssn 9sas IS s' to sDG
ss,tiey Manufacturing Company vs.. wend.;
motion By az appellant @ for extension to fss day Of
iosed term to le record abstracts and 0ef' al
], c; R, R, Company VS.. seitz; motion By aP.
lie abstracts and briefs. allowed. -''
and Sy asps awsy OF f'
notion BY APPELLANT for Extension Of tme to June
1 to iie abstracts and briefs allowed.
Drainage Commissioners Drainage Commits
sioners motion by appellant for extension Of time
to file abstracts and briefs allowed: time extended
to June g 1903.
Griswold vs.. Griswold: motion by appellant for
lowed; time extended to June 2 1903.
Coal Company; suSses,ion by appellant diminu-
record. abstracts and briefs: suggestions by ap-
pellee in opposition to appeants motion for ex-
tension Of time to fle abstracts and briefs.
Chicago and Alton Railway Company vs. Ho-
gan: motion by appellee for leave to redocket
caIse. etc.
Montgomery Coal Company vs. Barringer: mo.
tion by appellant for fifteen days extension Of
time to file briefs allowed.
Court adjourned to Wednesday. June 3.