The Hawaiian star. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu]) 1893-1912, 1903-09-25
NO CAUSE FOR WORRY.

There disposition Judge decision regarding 'n
famous crimes seriously that seriously its effects
Many people think there will be general jail delivery all those
jail being ought go there really finding
no way OF breaking But there won't be any general Jail delivery
least there needn't be any.
Nothing is where the principles of AngloSaxon juris
which
there might be general Jail deliveries But is Of the principles
of the AngSaxon system jurisprudence that decide only the
before them So that matter how broad the principle they lay
down. only the before the And matter how
the principle might release from jail releases none by its
force but only those who bring suitable proceeding to the
application of the principle to themselves
Some years the Criminal Court of Cook County, Illinois, in
habas corpus proceeding held that could be his
trial for msdemeano police expect upon written
previous this time had been put their trial oral
accusation usually made by the policeman who made the arrest the
sergeant who prisoner police station Under
this decision estimated that fully treourths of the twelve hun
bred or more prisoners in the House of Correction could have secured
their liberty. AS Of fact hall dozen of them actually did
There Many Of them heard of the
knowing guilt they recognized business punish
neither did that
principle of law hocus pull with
alderman the that could them before the end Of
their Many others the end OF their bother
The bulk of them had neither friends bring the
necessary process their freedom. So it
Readers OF mainland newspapers must frequently have read OF dec
sons here and there which predicted would @ and
tenaes But no reader OF the mainland or any other newspapers
read OF decision that did as and penentare
Neither will Judge Gears decision
What Of deal more Importance the decision than
Gear Of its working general jail delivery is its effect on the actual adj
ministraton of justice But this does that there
ought be difficulty though there be nconve
Men will drunk just they did before Judge Gear
will have them they have done the past Judge Gear
is then there why they should be brought be-
fore Judge Lindsay just usual and fined two three five
and costs as the be- just before But Judge Gear
right there why complaint should not be made and
the and the individual brought before Judge Lindsay
for commta the action the grand jury and the evidence
it, why Judge Lindsay should him await the
action of the grand AS there either of
be taken there why they should
both be TAKEN and carried simultaneously There be absolute
difference proceeding from the present except that records
Kept One the record OF arrest complaint hearing judgment
fine imprisonment and the latter mmus committing the de-
PENDANT to JAIL the other record OF the complaint examna
ton for commitment and holding bail On the mtmus the prison
will be Jail he has and confidence in Judge
jail delivery opinion he can file petition for habeas and be
released by the Circuit Court whereupon the High Sheriff will hold
him bail to await the action of the grand and the machinery
all this has been in motion the hasn't
lawyers that becomes mmatera to him whether Judge Gear
right wrong he will serving his jail If
served before the grand jury his the grand jury
knowing the fact readily refuse to bring in bill against
him. and the matter ended If the finished
grand jury gets to his they find BILL they think
should be found which be noe pressed when
ed they refuse the evidence Indictment