The daily morning journal and courier. [volume] (New Haven, Conn.) 1894-1907, 1903-02-07
In and ABOUT THE COURTS
YESTERDAY WAS SHORT CALEE-
DAR IN SUPERIOR Court.

Dividend 10 Osborn Machine Company's
credItors-Hsnvy Bond for Students
List of Divorces Matters.
Short calendar in the superior court
was held yesterday morning before
Judge Edwin B. eager in the supreme
court room. The case of Louis L. briggs
ct al VS.. Driggs-Seabury Gun and
Ammunition company was declared
ready, and a motion for allowance for
counsel sees to the plaintiffs made. At
torneys William and Hartman asked
$500 for drawing up papers for the re-
ceivers. Objection was made to the bill
by Attorney Bennett, receiver, and At
torney Gum, who appeared for the
former officers of the concern. An order
was issued TO put in an itemized state
ment of the expenditures included in
the request for $500.
In the case of Evans VS.. the Metropol-
itan Rubber Co., a motion for accept
ance of report on claim of Charles A.
Place, filed January %, 1903, was made.
Charles A. Place was president of the
company and claims that the concern
owes him $27 900 for three years salary.
After he had put in his claim the mat
ter went to the United States circuit
court in New York, where it was found
that the claim of Mr.. Place interfered
with the proceedings. He then asked
leave to withdraw, but was not allowed
to do so. The matter was continued
over one eek.
Attorney Wright appearing in the
case of Brown VS.. the Osborn Machin-
cry Co., stated that the receiver held
$7,4S4.16 in cash assets, with which to
satisfy ordinary claims Of $1S,575. The
court ordered a payment of so per cent.
on these claims.
In the case of Troeder VS.. Orthwein
ct AL, the ticket Spectator who was
assaulted by some students two nights
before one of the large football games.
on motion for special bail in the case
of each defendant, the court gave two
weeks for each to furnish a bond of ST.
500.
DIVORCE CASES.
Mrs. Gertrude G. Day is not having
clear sailing in her attempt to get di-
vorce from Charles Fl. Day, to whom
she was married less than a year ago.
Yesterday morning, after hearing DR..
Walker and Mrs. Day testify, Judge
eager, in the superior court, said he
would like more evidence before grant
ing decree. The case then went over
for a week.
Judge eager then heard four other
divorce cases and granted them all.
Mrs. Sidonia A. Cameron. formerly
Miss Speh, was divorced from George
NJ. Cameron, proprietor of the Sea View
hotel at SaVin Rock. They were mar
ried in 1896. The decree was granted on
the grounds of intolerable cruelty. Mrs.
Cameron said her husband often beat
here and hit her in the face. On ac-
count Of his conduct Mrs. Cameron
said she left her husband early in 1902
DEGREES were granted in these cases:
Julia G. Eckstein VS.. NJ Maurice Eek
stein. Married June 2, 1891. Grounds,
desertion.
Edward Hopkins VS.. Emma L. Hop
kins. Married October Is, 1893 Grounds,
desertion.
Alice Baldwin vs.. Frank L. Baldwin.
Married in 1876. Grounds, intemper-
ance.
Former Major Clark of the Foot
Guard, testified in the Hopkins case.
He said Mrs. Hopkins told him she
would not live with her husband.
HUBBARD CASE NEARING TRIAL.
Some new facts came out in the SUI
perior court yesterday morning in con-
nection with the sensational suit of Miss
Maud !. Hubbard against Charles r.
Bishop, of the Bishop Box company.
who employed the plaintiff as his stem
ographer. She claims $4,000 for as
sault,
From what came about yesterday
morning the case will be tried in two
weeks, if no settlement is reached. Fur
Their, a jury and not a court judge will
decide how much Miss Hubbard should
be paid
Motion was made before Judge Rob-
inson in the superior court yesterday
morning to have the case assigned for
trial the coming week. This was not
granted, but next Friday the case will
come up for assignment for the follow
ing week.