The Billings gazette. [volume] (Billings, Mont.) 1896-1919, 1903-01-09
JUDGE LOUD CALLS CRIMINAL
AND CIVIL DOCKET.
TWO MORE PLEAD GUILTY
Eddie WaIIing and Robert Glover
Fined for Third Degree Assault
. Roberts Dismissed.
From Tuesdays Daily Gazette.

From Tuesdays Daily Gazette.
The calendar Of the district court
was called and cases set for trial, this
morning. The criminal part Of the
docket was taken up first and dates
set for the different causes as fol-
lows:
State VS.. James Cook and Laurie
Harris. Driving stock from its ac-
customed range; January 20.
State VS.. Louis Leon. Assault in
the first degree; January II.
State VS.. Walter Cox. Forgery;
January 10.
State VS.. Leonard Luther. Grand
larceny; January 10.
State VS.. Rolla L.. Glunt. Grand
larceny; January ID.
State VS.. Ed. Mcfarland. Forgery;
January 16.
State VS.. Minnie Farrell. Grand
larceny; January Is.
On motion of the county attorney
the case of State VS.. s. B. Roberts,
charged with grand larceny, was dis
missed and the defendant discharged.
Like action was taken in the case
of State VS.. Albert Glover, held joint
1y with Eddie Walling and Robert
Glover on the charge of assault in
the second degree. The other two de-
PENDANTS were permitted to plead
guilty to assault in the third degree
and the court fined each 500 and
costs.
Civil Matters.
On plaintiffs motion the case of
Harry Scott ct al VS.. |. N. Keither ct
ux., was dismissed.
The case of ]. L.. Rhead VS.. the
Big Ditch company was by consent
continued for the term.
Hearing of the case of c.. 7.
Thomas VS.. w. H. Huff and w. D.
Story was set for January q.
By consent the cases of SHERMAN
Bros. VS.. John F. Locke and Davis &
Kermode were continued for the term.
The case of T. w. Adkins VS.. Drill
la Whitney was set for January %.
Ryan Bros Cattle company VS..
Stuart Polk will be heard January %.
The case of William NJ. Rodgers
VS.. Yee Lee was dismissed as, set
tied. -.- FOL-.
The case of the Slater Brick com
pany VS.. A. Motschman will be tried
January "a. n
DEGREES were ordered in the cases
OF Josephine Bond VS.. Frank E. Bond,
and Monzella, Latter VS.. James II.
Latter, both actions for divorce. In
neither case was a defense made and
proof.
A decree was signed in the case OF
Sarah Gerard VS.. Abraham Gerard, an
action for divorce. ~
Clara Rousch was granted'a divorce
from Charles E. Rousch on the ground
of n%On-suppOrt. .~-0-
On motion of the plaintiff the case
of Josephine Schott VS.. Gus Schott,
an action for divorce, was dismissed,
the parties evidently having made up
their past difficulties.
The case of the Donovan-McCor-
mick VS.. G.. w. Kline was
dismissed for want Of prosecution.
On motion the case of Margaret
Quinn VS.. Frank Quinn al stricken
from the docket.
The matter of w. H. Clanton vs.. l.
F. David was dismissed without
prejudice.
The cases of Custer county VS.. j.
j. Walk and Mrs. ]. J. Walk were Or
dered dismissed, on plaintiffs mo-
ton. -
Other cases set for hearing were:
Kinnick VS.. Northern Pacific Rail
way company; damages; January 26.
Smith VS.. Northern Pacific Railway
company; damages; January ~.
Tomlinson VS.. Northern Pacific Rail
way company; damages; January 80.
Ellen Roark VS.. Patrick Roark, di-
vorce; January 81. Yates VS.. Mills;
debt: February 2. French VS.. Con-
a February 8. Ettien VS.. Drum,
February 4. Link & Carter VS.. j. g.
Sherman, February 5. Gray VS.. Ash
baugh, February g..
A $4,000 Fire.