Burlington weekly free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1866-1928, 1903-05-14
TEST INT0XlCA7l0N CASE
Argument before Supreme Court
A Testimonial to Chief Judge Ty-
ier-Important Opinions Hand.
cd Down.

"a. INC STU ,,, .Ious.' ne -, 49,, -
W., , -, e',u."e ~, eno rLins I,,dao
IN VIZ VIZ -, - 49, Da9.
,,,, - &c rh,ue. Church ard
~, ~, ne"ia, ~. ,,,.. , nc do h1,
Sho,s =, n I,a.a
Snerlt u. Il, Evans. ,..,,. .,
ny D"' w Wv go 49,. - e,a,, o,,+
! ,S.l. ~ ~. re-. f., prou,r
y, p,,,Iar, r. " Kan
n ~ H., lf p'r,irgtor irui-
Icus an ~ - -ioW' ,,1,N.. Iii l.,
cor.Ins ~ G, A,hons I1arrv pIodgott.
a, , It.., IuiI Ma, rn,ath,n
~ ~ N''',p Sin,1 r e. iohrshnrv
=, U.s. ",,u =" 80, u. II t|iis. -,
,..,,,.,' ,,. Ii.o,,I ~ Annie |
'i ni - - '" ~ A.
,.,i 80 80 v,s,',. ~ W NiIae If rarton |
-, ~ ,,, I,-a',a.,aat T u Ia,,
w., ~ C"iIt tTr,,l. I5I,,n,ln,, Of North |
~, ". - =, $50. sc i,o,ho, - |
seIu w. - po,b,'u,' pmIi,rd ~
I'".',u, VI ~ - Eirot;id ~ Irniric,d |
- go, ~, r,hoi,a r,",, II start or |
~. , a. 60" % - e., - &c u,a,nrht,r,.
= i'' n, ,,,r,1 .r,ford n B,rt an5
=, =, l % S,'.a ". ~, c,tnL |
~ ". ~ t M" 4, W,u.o, or 20
n - :, ~ no,iire- oe ch.,son n 8
uo.f'' -. 'e -
I, .ri ad . ,o,,or roooi,ad tbie
~, f,,, ,,,,iof I,,do, pcuou ~ pm
,i',r ,a,i,n 10. u.hiIo no lie not ahIo
.o''.' "a ~ tnrr, 81 ro,r, no is battor
" III e., KIM, a,a s,rar,,b rat
M ea.m! , -. n,to,,tio,, 60 husinass ard
.';i - Sc w., ,,,osor, 40 cont lindest
~. =, al ,,,r ,,,e,nbore ~ tho bench
'eSaius " on VIZ - "
d',' .''' ,,,; 49,. VI
-, - S.;.,,oL,'.,. 80, rroeant ox.
lHcko'S ~ N'iuuleourS VIZ i $780, ~ 10
I.o..I.s ~ w. w. t,, "a r'.Inr ,bat
| supreme Voui W. ' us -, a,,,ito nv
nirod they would he admitted at an adj
iourned torn OF the present court 10 DE
heIi S"nie UNI nv ~, p"i W 'u,s
Inc dock't WAS 'aiIcu anu Nv. 'N''.oui
or cases SCI iot healli,s l"ll""cu Wy
closely inc 'rial caIeniai' nun
term not To exceed Two "eeNS III iths'n
The Chittonden county case Oh Htatt' en-
rel James H. bnrkc W. Doh'S - nav
ley, the Burhnston n'aYora'E CaSe, wa
set Mt the heel OF me uoche' anu "i'I .i"t
be heard inns week; ms was uol'o a' o,,o
| request OF ". a. bui''iu ~tn W. -.
scented to by r. e. Brown me only Chit
tendon county case set for hearing was
l. n. Chase vs.. II. 5. Soule. assumpslt'
The habeas corpus case OF STATE VS..
Andrew Rogers from Montpelier Guy court
involving the right of city court Judges
to send a man to the House of Correction
as an alternative sentence for second
| offence of intoXication and the mardamus
proceedings against the Barre & Mont
| pelier Electric railroad relating TO the
increase of fare from five TO ten cents he-
| tween the two cities VIII not be argued
until Washington county cases are reach
ed some time next week.
| The Chittcnden county cases continued
are: In re- Rufus T.. Brown; Shepard *
Morse Lumber company VS. Ell |, nor
brook ct ais; i. c, Dodge VS.. Molla y.
Dodge divorce; in re John j. Enrght
petition for reinstatement
or,>,o,-c ,r,xDrD DOyyN
Opinions were handed down this morn
ing in several cases. In the Washington
county case of State VS.. j. P Donovan
forgery. in which the respondent was
convicted of altering a lromiSSory ho'e
for 500 given by Alonzc A Parson of
Morctown, and in which exceptions were
taken to the exclusion of certain evil
dence, the judgment of the lower court
was reversed, the verdict set aside and
a new trial granted. Opinion by Judge
TYLER.
The Rutland county cases Of Edward
Dana as executor of Mary y. Cheney w.
r.. c. Fred N, Charles NJ, and Carrie ~.
Stafford and Edward Dana as executor
of Mary \. Cheney vs. Carrie y. star
ford were disposed Of together. The
pro forma decree Diminishing the bill was
reversed and cause remanded with decree
that mandate he issued in accordance
with the prayer of the bill. These cases
involved the disposition of part of Mary
A Chonev's estate and have been in court
since 1897 Opinion by Judge Munson.
w G; PAYNE appellee. vs. William
shoots apuellant from Franklin county,
was a trespas case involving the right
of lossecs of leased lands to post such
land against trespassers. The judgment
OF the lower couTt wa "i.'' ''vu ".lH
those who have leased enclosed lands I'm
nesting the same. opinion by Judge
Watson
In the trcspass case of Charles K. Davis
: vs. Bowers Granite company from Gale
donna county. judgment of the lower
court was affirmed. Opinion by Judge
Watson
! Isaac s Wilson VS.. the Union Mutual
, Fire Insurance company assumpsit, from
Orleans county. In the lower court the
| plaintiff obtained a verdict of $3.50, fol
l The loss of his building by fire. One al
tho Questions involved in this suit was as
= IN what constitutes a steam farm engine
e The cause of the fire in this case was
sharks from an engine used for cuttins
d eusilaGo and the supreme court holHs una
= ,io,, Of the insurance contract. Judgmen
?, or thn lower court reversed and caus,
f | ,smanded Opinion bv Judge Tyler.
= state rs Don 4 Bisbec. adultery, from
Addison county. This case went to tn
d sunramc court on execution hy the re
# snnndent on the ground that the indict
a ,,ont Cor tho crime of which he was con