Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1903-01-24
+ Consolidate
|7,b1eeCompanles
49,, comDany Ditectoss Meet TODAY and Consider
J o,.s,r Of Consolidating Without Regard e he Norm
' ,,. q,opk- Yesterdays cActOn REPORTED CON-
''' n..b,,o,d and Too .lmposiam Sessions Held

.tdnnt tn0N z ''
'''~ s",es Of this county are de-
'o''', q consolidate and gel ,s ,ns
ns' !. 10 derived from a unine"
nl' y "a entity regardless OF ,ne
' rs. and and dIsappoIotment' Of IL, the
'' Accordingly sSt # has held two I'M !,
A'' .s,,ngs today to continue .
, ~ II, Of the subject The n na"
as's ,'.,sa for several hours ana
y p,,i I i tss office Of Angu NJ can
D', T,s : second meeting is now un-
THAT. too, WIN doubtless De
~ !. well as an important one.
- y session held this morning there
~ ,,s,snt all Of the members OF
,,,5. Of directors Of the Utah q
,.,s canal company the East
r,,iratIon company the South
Canal company and the North
|, irrigation Company. Yesterdays
On he part Of the latter com
,sieeting the scheme TO CONSOLE
no four companies was reported
- tbonks given the Com
nj ,lub and others who have been
,.yOrns to bring about the result
,Als had been done and other in
ta matters considered, the meet
6aIOarned, after which the directors
IN three first named companies met
discussed The question Of unihcation
the belief that they would reap
advantages therefrom, The plan
rot yet been perfected and at 1880
afternoon a recess was taken until
E6tf hour. This meeting is In SEES
At the hour Of going to press,
III THE MERGER MEETING.
stated in last nights News" the
kholdsrs Of the North Jordan lrf-
b company held a well attended
linz yesterday at Taylorsville, at
The matter was thoroughly dis
n and a vote taken resulting in its
Ii BY ISIS nays to 575 ayes. The
IDS upon which the proposition
opposed are fully set forth In the
Ming resolutions adopted by the
lng end Introduced by John c.
BAY Of Granger;
RESOLUTIONS.
hgpas, Articles Of consolidation
been prepared for the approval OF
tlon Of the Utah & Salt Lake Canal
bany, the East Jordan Irrigation
lspy the South Jordan Canal COM
and the North Jordan Irrigation
any Now, therefore. be II
Solved That the stockholders Of the
b Jordan Irrigation company, in
Injecting assembled. do not APP
+ Of consolidating the interest OF
company for the following reasons
faThat a consolidation would be
nental to the interests Of said
lany for the reason that its rights
established by the decree of the
Is would be abrogated. the decree
Pc courts becoming obsolete after
RolIdaton.
y ond-That a consolidation Of the
canal companies named is not es-
a 10 secure government aid In
ns Utah lake a reservoir. and thc
opment Of an additional water
Nv
Dtessor 7, H, Newell on oct. /. 1902
" Lake City, IN answer to o. p
n who asked II united action on
au Of the canal companies would
forth the desired aid from tht
hment said that a better plar
De 70 apply for assistance in tn
Of Waler'users rather than as q
lahy or companies incorporated fol
fon'ro and distribution Of said wa.
Later In the sessions OF the Irri,
n congress Professor Newell said
lne government would not recog,
s corporation or corporations, bui
Gallons for assistance should b,
% The name Of water-users OF
r'akers.
H kGED FAVORABLE ACTION.
"a so,'e stated the meeting was wei
.uea ana the matter was discusse,
Us phases, W. II. Halgh. presi
" the company presided. an,
were Present Of the Commercial
Attorney +, s. Richards. Hon
henry Smith and Frank Y. Tay
'ach OF whom spoke urging favor
aclon and setting forth the bene
y Oe derived. The meeting Taste,
NJ Two hours and closed with tn
N0l Oh The resolutions above given
NITcHER OPPOSES 1T.
sSlng for the North Jordan peo
M g.,. gainst the proposed merger
NHeher said that on Investigate
~ oeeh unable to find that IN
y. department had any rule max
. .s'sy for water companies I
Welr interests before receIvln
.'asll appropriations. He sal
hal according to the state
u me engineers and others
~ a. least four or five years be
~, project could be- sufficient
s 's,ss % reap the benefit. ana h
e .s !. Just as well TO maintain m
ny =. s .s until nearer the time "a
~ - we benefit He expressed m
ms, - y, hNfNfunntnt WOul
wv as literally with the Mort
a ~ sope as a company as the
as a Consolidation.
NAcKAYs OBJECTIONS
I ~ Maciay opposed the mere.
H. ], standpoint OF the proposs
IA " =. consolidation, in thai the
~ ~ one director for each con
~ Oe selected by the sloctboi,
oo os entire combination. He sal
d h, I'm rany ought TO be allowed
frso vnh director He said furth,
n \, 'sshuy In meetings OF +,
y ne, ana ~. Presidents Il had bee
w. sne North Jordan canal ha
"a ~, NY. than the irrlntors We ,,s
M !, ana CHARGED that under an
rr",a cylsolidaiion the mana =,
b No.,. o. hostile to the intere
s., ,'o5.h Jordan company. bao s,e
:, Az m5fe water 10 the acre ,hs
,e,se n.y. oshsr companies. The ma
.-.,.s}. ne thought wonld No
- disirij,Snl,l' n I. North Iordan's wat,
Il among the other z,
-Ar coL HOLMES SAYS.
''''' : p Holmes, on being int