The Butler weekly times. (Butler, Mo.) 1881-1918, 1903-10-08

rIed that city In go by plurality Of
269, and Judge Valiant in 1902 by 9
plurality OF S93.
De Soto Is claimed to have sustain
ed O democratic loss OF 129 The
otncial figures show a democratic
gain Of 206, the republicans having
carried the city in go BY 1913 and
lost It In 1902 byS
Brookneld, sccordingto the Globe
Democrat, had q democratic loss OF
249; there was q net democratic gain
in that city OF 90. In 80 it gent
republican by 65 and in 1902 by As.
Trenton, In the Globe. Democrats
figures, shows a democratic loss Of
asa. The official figures show that
the republican majority for '96 was
292, or net democratic gain Of pa
instead OF q democratic loss OF Asa.
Louisiana, according to the Globe
Democrat, sustained o democratic
loss OF Z; there was q democratic
gain in Louisiana Of 103, Bryan
having lost il by Al votes In '96 and
Valiant having carried 1t in 1902 BY
50.
Mexico, which Is claimed by the
Globe Democrat to have sustained a
democratic loss OF 7s9, gave Mr..
Bryan a plurality Of 764 and Judge
Valiant plurality Of 514. The
democrats cast 1892 votes in that
city in '96 and the republicans 62S;
in 1902 the republicans had 273 and
the democrots 1877; the democratic
loss, therefore, was 40 per cent and
the Republican loss more than So
per cent. ~
Marshall, in the Globe-Democrat's
figures, shows a democratic loss OF
S65. In 1896 Bryan had a plurality
OF 1853; in 1902 Judge Valliant's plu-
rality In that city was 603, or a net
democratic loss Of 100, or practical
lily 700 less than claimed by the
Globe Democrat.
Clinton shows, according to the
Globe Democrat, democratic loss
OF 1856. There was a net democratic
gain in Clinton OF 900, Bryan having
carried 1t in 1896 by % and Valiant
in 1902 by 251.
| Fulton, il the Globe. Democrats
figures were correct, would show a
democratic loss OF 256. The official
figures, however, show that the dem
ocratic plurality Of '96 was 1913,
while in 1902 Judge Valiant carried
that city by $40, or a democratic
lgain OF ISL.
Cape Girardeau, according to the
Globe Democrat, had democratic
loss of 401. As a matter of fact,
Mckinley carried that city in 1896
by 442. while Judge Valiant only
lost it by 40, or a net democratic
gain of 800. This decreased repub-
lican plurality, however, was par
TALLY due tolocalrepublican disturb.
ances.
i Warrensburg, as shown by the
Globe Democrat, sustained a demo.
cratic loss OF 507. The official figures
show that there wasa net democratic
gain in that city OF 112, the republi
cans having carried Warrensburg in
1896 by 81, and lost it in 1902 by
80.
Maryville, in the Globe-Democrat's
J figures, shows a democratic loss 0
, LIS. That city went for Bryan il
1896 by &c, and Valiant lost it il
the off year OF 1902 by 70, or a ne
democratic loss OF SO, instead o
Ills.
Boonville is shown by the Globe
I Democrat to have sustained a demo
cratic loss Of Ala. As a matter G
7 fact, the republicans cast 40 NOR
e votes in Boonville in 1896 than the,
7 did in 1902, while the democrats cas-
: - more votes for Bryan, or a ne
democratic gain OF so.
Poplar Bluff, in the Globe Demo
Gratis figures, shows democrati
7 loss of 2O2. The republican gain i
Poplar Bluff was Al, or LOS less tina
claimed by the Globe Democrat.
= Lexington, accordingto the Glob'
= Democrat, sustained q Democrat
70 loss OF 482. The official figure
show, on the contrary, q net dems
y cratic gain Of $50, Mckinley havin
carried Lexington in 1896 by u
E. while Valiant carried it in 1902
70 104.