Daily Kennebec journal. [microfilm reel] (Augusta, Me.) 1870-1975, 1903-11-05

a dog owned by the defendant nl1ngins
directly in front of an automobile in
which the plaintiff and his wife were
riding, thereby upsetting and overturn-
ing the automobile and causing the
plaintiff and his wife to be thrown from
the same to the ground with great vio-
lence. A similar action by Mary f.
Lombard, wife of the plaintiff, against
the same defendant, is also entered.
Charles F. Johnson. Esq, of Water
vile for the plaintiffs.
Charles S. j.. Ruggles of Gardner.
Mass. VS.. Marcus r. Williams of Fred
erick, Md. This is an action with the
ad damnum placed at $4,000 to recover
on account. Arson NJ. Goddard. Esq,
of Augusta for the plaintiff and Thom-
as j. Lynch, Esq, of Augusta for the
defendant.
John F. Moors and Charles H. Cabot,
both of Boston, VS.. Sperry II. Locke of
Waterville. This is an action with the
ad damnum placed at $500 to recover
the balance on account annexed. Corn
ish & Bassett of Augusta for the plain
tiff and Charles F. Johnson, Esq, of
Waterville' for the defendant
Ezra Bates of Sidney, VS.. Charles E.
Smith of Boston. This is an action
with the ad damnum placed at $1,000
to recover payment on note Will
hanson & Burleigh of Augusta for the
plaintiff and Thomas J. Lynch, Esq, of
Augusta for the defendant.
The Maine Central Railroad Compa-
ny VS.. the Cushnoc Paper Company of
Augusta. This is an action with the
ad damnum placed at $500 to recover
payment for balance due on account
annexed. Orville D. Baker ESQ, Of
Augusta for the plaintiff and NJ S. Hol-
way, Esq, Of Augusta for the defend
ant.
Stewart w. Pine of Watervile VS.. c.
w. Hussey of Waterville and John r.
Pollard of Winslow. This is an &C
ton with the ad damnum placed at
5000. The writ alleges that the defend
ants at Waterville August II. 1908
with force and arms assaulted the
plaintiff and him then and there took
and imprisoned. and restrained him Of
his liberty, and held him in servitude
from six o'clock, p NJ, August II, 1903,
until nine o'clock. P. NJ, August Il.
loVo. dEoIilSL tIlC law VI tiic icliI anu
against the will of the plaintiff.
Charles F. Johnson. Esq, of Water
vile for the plaintiff.
A. d. Dodge of Waterville, executor
of the estate of the late William Lamb
of Clinton, vs. Owen Learned of Cln-
ton. This is an action with the ad dam
mum placed at $1,000 to recover payment
on account annexed. Charles F. john
son, Esq, of Waterville, for the plain
tiff.
Richard Sullivan of Boston, Mass,
Henry Ferguson of Hartford, Conn,
and Robert II. Gardiner and Josiah S.
MaXcy. both of Gardiner VS.. the p. c..
Holmes Company of Gardiner This is
an action with the ad damnum placed
at $4,000. to recover possession of GER
tain land. Charles A. Knight Esq, of
Gardiner, for the plaintiffs and George
w. Heselton, Esq, of Gardiner, for the
defendant corporation.
The Gardiner Savings Institution, VS..
the P. c. Holmes Company of Gardiner.
This is an action with the ad damnum
placed at $4,000 to recover possession
of certain land. Charles A. Knight,
ESQ. of Gardiner for the plaintiff and
TeOlSe VI TitSSltoi, EST, VI ddfulilef,
for the defendant.
w. 3. Arnold & Company vs.. Mrs.
Emma Jones, both OF Waterville. This
is an actiCn with the ad damnun placed
at $500 to recover Oh account annexed.
Brown & Brown of Waterville, for the
plaintiff and Harvey d. Eaton, Esq, of
Waterville for the defendant.
Harriet G. Clay of Boston. Mass, VS..
Marcus II. Williams of Frederick, Md.
This is an action with the ad damnum
placed at $4,000 to recover payment on
account annexed. George w. HeseIton,
Esq. of Gardiner, for the plaintiff.
George w. Fitsgerald VS.. Emma v
Jones. both of Waterville. This, is an
action with the ad damnum placed at
$4,000 to recover on account annexed.
Brown & Brown of Watervile, for the
plaintiff and Harvey D. Eaton, Esq, Of
Watervilla for the defendant.