Richmond dispatch. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1884-1903, 1903-01-18
TEE RICHMOND DIsPAT cH-sUNDAYl JANUARY- 1gks

both Judge Loving and Mr. Strobe wen
a.tIthes witness $left5no doubt on that score
| The committee listened with creates
interest to- a letter which Judge. Camp
former commented on the fact that sJudgS
Loving one of8his bitterests enemies
and asked Judge Wood to preside attn
| hearing 81.
:. Chairman southall and Major Conraf
wanted the letters which passed @betweer
! Judge8SNVood and Judge Campbell: an
vice versa. put in &. evidence Chairman
/ So1thalI was par tcu1arly5 insistent on tbs
! point. Mr.. Strobe put in an oar to the
| same effect.
! Did YOU feel that you were under oh
fSligatons to- Judge Campbell for you
relations in reference to the judgeship?.
The faces Of the committeeman plainls
indicated their establishment when the
witness said he I" did not
! izazy on Many Points.
The witness was very 11azy On many
points
It was an utter impossibility for hin
to explain why he selected jury1nen fro-
tneScroEd.z and he could not explain VIII
I he rejected the Connronwealth's Attorls
negss petition for q change Of ve3us
Judge Loving. at one point Of the inves
I tigation. read the law governing the draw
ing5o of juries, and the witness exhibited
ignorance Of these laws. much to th
a1nazsIne nj Of the numerous attorneys al
tending the. proceedings. Witness coulf
not rem ember'' whether he ever toll
some Of the ju-yrnen that they did right
IN. {. a.cqIn IIu Judge Campbell.
~ this point Judge Adams was re
caied5 and asked when it was that h
( va, I. asked by Judge Campbell to serv
In the case He could not exactly re 3
member the date. but it was more thar
six. days after the ASA ult.
Mr. c.. Paine. Judge Campbell's
bosom friend t7as next called to thu
stand The witness was q fire examp:
SCFTOWi20gcI his Cj0ga rH1S Wit
Judge Campbell
III, He !, began his testimony by. saying
t the Hers freqsn5y gagresep5sd Day
brought against him The witness con
tradicted TIE testimony Of Attorney
v n, me a,t gixen on the stand Yesterday
neWal Of his application TO sell liquor
the. witness said the evidence had beer
deduced showing that Mr.. Day frequent
hsaea !h sai aFG the niPnesz r Da
frequently threw down the gauntlet tc
the ministers and told them if they
M 20 ID ID, bring their prescriptions he would
Mr.. Paine said that Duffy Malt Wits.
key bottles were as thick around Am
Ties could Be Esl i0 everS Wv np5 eo'
you gentlemen. said the witness
r ypsG b ! ), know what Duffy's aIal.
Major Conrad looked pityinglys at. the.
witness.
'.You do not mean. to intimate that
these committeeman would be familiar
whisksy!'
The witness nodded snilingly. Some
Of the members of the COMMITTEES are
in the wild Businesses Of the mountains:
others know the brands that are popu-
lar IN the low and Tidewater country
Eas fHa 3fa their 70 Gndsr4E gapesz there
anything about Duffy'S Malt.
are you aware that Judge Campbell
at ct ax ad ms cona aaX in
iiuenee TIE T ,e, 81 Judge or jury IN the case
; I.ana not, sir. : said the witness, "and
silould has dropped his case like a hot
Major Conrad then asked the following
ruled upon it:
ra5lti am inst E' to ask you if are
and controversies that are said to exist
in Anlhersr?"
The committee. took q recess for ten
upon their return Chairman southall an
nounced that the committee had decided
this could be gone into only just so
far as Judge Campbell could be connect
ed with it.
Campbell Drc.r, Ware Act.
On cross-exanllnation Mr. Paine was
questioned closely Judge Loving as to
the Ware act; Witness said that he. did
not agree with Judge Grimsley that the
5whiskey--in accordance with his ruling.
The wording of the act was not suf1i-.
Gently strong to be operative
he did not believe that DR.. Ware drew
the act
Who did draw it?.' asked Mr.. Strobe.
The witness objected to answering this
,GDpSfian Inf Conrad said that no
did not want TO keep any Of the facts
from the connlittee, and he announced
.that-Judge Campbell had drawn the act
This announcement created a small
sensa ton.
Of cross-exan ination the Witness ad,
mitted that he had frequently sarunK
whisky in Days drugstore.
I really don't know. never saw the
drink of whlskey.''
did You drink any beer there
Yes.
son had sent over to Lvnehburg and
bought a crate of beer. Then they
drank it. There had been as many as
four crates in the place.
did Day sell beer?
.He sold something they called hop
More merriment,
ing at the committee, "all know what
hop ale is
Several members Of the committee
shook their heads vigorously. The wit
ness, making Very much surprise, said
that hop ale could be found at every
crossroads store.
Asked about the disorder in the court.
witness said he did not think there was
very much OF it,. a
81 have seen more in this hail. said
the witness, than ever saw in the
progress Of that trial. and I certainly
would not say that this committee is
not competent to sit i'll this investiga-
ton
The evidence for the next half hour
Was sensational in the extreme.
Post Dated Resolutions.
Judge Loving proved by the witness
tina t the resolution ADOPTED at the mass
meeting held in the courtroom imrne-
diately after the verdict of the jury,
was drawn up two days before the con-
~ son OF the trial.
These resolutions highly lauded Judge
and tho place where the YER
lict should have appeared in the reso-
luton was left blank
I Mr. Paine said that some one IN the
courtroom handed the resolutions to him.
anaahesoHered them.
Suppose the verdict had been against
aim, you'd these resolutions have been
offered 3" asked Judge Loving.
The Witness did not know.
Z Mr. StrodeAthen informed the witness !
hat he would have to ask him several |