New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1903-10-20
DEVERY MEN OUSTED.
The Election Board Takes 4ctiOn
against Three" Bill to Fight.

Il was apparent from hearings before the Board
Of Elections yesterday. which resulted in turning
down three Of Devery's candidates. that Devery
had frightened Tammany leaders in a few districts
by arranging TO run candidates for Assemblymen
and aldermen under the emblem Of the pump" In
those districts. Particular dismay seemed TO have
been created by the petitions nominating Devery
candidates in Charlie" MUrphys 'gashouse" dis
trict the XVIIIth. and in "Florrie' Sullvan's dis
trict the With said at the hearing that in
the With District the 5ullivans at first treated the
nomination OF Devery candidates as good JOKE
but changed their minds suddenly
Elias DuIburger is our candidate for Assembly
nan in the with and Julius Levy is our candi-
ss+e for alderman down there" explained one OF
TOeverv's ueutenants: and. say the SullivanS
laughed 10 split their sides over Dulourger al first
They took him for joke, they did Then ne
started in make house-to-house hustle Tor
votes and saw he was gettin' votes so fast, so
many were promising support him. that the
SuIlivans stopped laughin' and jumped In 70 stop
his nomination. They've come here with a lot OF
a-idazfts iutendin' queer his certificate On!
they're more afraid OF DuIourger than fusion
now"
Tsidor Cohen representing Tsmmany Hall. ap-
peared before the Elections Board in opposition
70 the nominations OF Dulburger and Levy he
declared that many OF the names on the petitions
for DuIburger and Levy were forgeries. and he had
an affidavit from a saIoonkeeper, who he said.
wrote fifty signatures one OF the petitions Coun-
sci FOR DuIburger end Levy said that the petition
50 literally signed by the saloonkeeper had been
thrown away and not among the petitions pre-
scented 70 the Board Of Elections
Ine ooar1z Lae I'd s.iS election as to Mr. Dull
R,,~re-'s nomination. but dismissed the protest
AGAINST M Levy. President NOorhis stated that
from the affidavits large number were false ana
probably not than one hundred were genuine.
The hrst case was an oplecl91 hi Ia F E n
AIderrnanic District. also in queens IN theSe us
fbe nomination. The only case which was success
fu that Of George n Mckey, VINO WaS nd
5ste win EIr McVey for Assemblynan, but as
he DID not hsye sE william Dickinson was run
BBing AGAINST Mr. McVey for alderman With him i'm
Wss Frank NJ Davis. who was candidate Tor
Aseer1biyrnsn but he did not have the right 10
use the emblem Of the Citizens Tnion5i ana was not
-l folsPI CASSIDY and David Van Nostrand OF
NJ o5res 81 the Citizens Union party in Queens
The protest included the b8isfr7ct Attorney
r. --o,,15 Of the objection was that there W.
not sufticient n9In 1I'eI,i Gl
I ne op}ecLo .1+ County Assembly and Aldermanic
nominations o. the Sterfd TO by P Harry Herman,
Charles Il. Knox Represented N o-iy one thou
va, 80 attached TO the nominations IN fIcL
mo9 ~ I99I[ ~ the city required that two thousand
names must be attached TO the peuICt OF the civ
.e~ze5 mat as Richmond was par OF t-e tf;s
b alters law applied TO Richmond Celht fo- ne
political .aa-- party ne '0's''' A.
tiT nominations for Alderman and f9r tng
a. re NNIIIth Assembly ana Atuel Ai.s- -o
7ssriS-s Of the Independent PE2Pie - were
$1,000 nv Leopold Worms Inc hOIl.lI .;,~sI,,
L-,co-9se Quinn and John J. quinn. ~ Tba
Ions we're based on the ground tna1
u t.-es on the petitions were loI I p, NJ
S.saiEo rhe writing expert was CaLIs. - On
1s ~ and he stated that ne tnouenr sd at
" oTL4ls,. =. ~ names the peCtlons were !" -
Per - re-Sons There were boo nstIheS Oh
3 ts. - The board sustained the ooJec'ioiS III '
&C., William Dsvery, the cadiaaIe Iol -aS ~
n 1~5ererdent Peoples party. was seen si. lase
on ne - ssl.ed what Re thought o. the DECISIONS
T2os ri OF Elections. ne salo. .-. % -,o-
y az -Sere we will Try 10 get a proper oe-
row ahu - nor take stock in the decision rem
,lI 49, .he board. as Il Is oniy coIhPostl % -
oeIso - the courts will. know. give a pIOteI
% nu,: decision and II viii be in our IaVor
aic -,-tb dfd not expect any otner
e. ~ ,ne board II is all TanmanE nan It S 49,
-Tkn are frightened out OF their ne 1871 S
MhE IT, PROTESTING OF the petitions surey stio
= Tbsy see that the people o. IL .I.lat co thew
wer -, Nv this means they can hqLL nls "a re-.
MIN - .he forgeries when eaINa-iIV $50 mi
As % ne petitions why II Is an Ia.se stoned
are - - &c cents that every haIe 20. - ~
Del 49, II was All q p.t - -,
1L..-- Hall and they thInk ma ++hsyi and out
TarnflAl-s When IL is all over thes - rtth -
~ - mat I have got @onae'hns u w.