The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1903-11-26
HIGHER COURTS RECORD.
SUPREME COURT.

Minutes
sc2I7. Robert II. Bartholomee vs. Town 1t
Lowell. Lake G. c. Agreement 10 submit
20oS7. Seymour Water Company ct al. vs.. City
of sey nour. Jennings c. c. Petition post
New Suit
eo2ss. Lovina Burck Eugene David. Ia
grange C. c. Record. Assignment OF errors.
In term. Bond
APPELLATE COURT
1883. westervelt VS.. National Manufacturing
Company. Ekhart c. c. Affirmed. Henley. q.
denta1 e%rloyes and Others Engage ~ias tSs
from divulging or using trade secrets or inven-
In the e S y
Where a party suppresses evidence the presump-
be against the interest Of the party suppressing
it. 8. This court cannot weigh the evidence in
T. An available error cannot be predicated upon
an offer to prove that 1t is not responsive 10
1855. Court of Honor VS.. Bankert. Shelby c.
c.. Motion to dismiss sustained. Wiley, T.. IA
must be followed by notice TO the appellee. OF Il
VIII be dismissed under Rule s.
Henley. c. J:-where a woman inherits land from
her deceased husband and marries again and
estate owned by her second husband at her
4422 Chaplin vs.. Du Shane. Elkhart C c. At
made the rssora 'Ss S "a
order or court II must be signed by the judge.
C. reversed Henley. C. THE holder Of a
sherif's certificate OF sale cannot during the
The se' land SOLD. and thereby obtain lien upon
the premises for the amount Of the taxes 30
ASA Cough VS.. State ex rel Hamilton C. c.
Affirmed. Robinson. Ill. Where there are sep
sIa no Is preseea on appeal
| the courts ruling on such motions by Joint
s 81 by al n ws9s
taken Jointly they are not available In .
separate assignment OF errors by one OF the ap-
| pellants.
Building s.S Saving n Tn,en y. psysr
| facts alleged In answer to have been mis-
represented 50 a: TO amount TO fraud should be
440 Terba VS.. Manufacturing Company.
Miami C: C. Affirmed Black IA complaint
covered after its rendition mus: show tina. the
and all the parties to the Judgment should b
made parties to the new action:
ford C. c. Affirmed. Robinson. III. Merely
naming n party In the caption OF an assign
him Hmm an ~ appellant 2 In term time appeal i
| Is not necessary TO name co-par.ies appellant or
by the OF and
| they were parties. g. witness may testify az
fact whether he ever executed deed to per-
deed was made is not attempting to prove the
tsss. Blair Is. Whitaker. yanderburg $. c:
Afirmsd Wiley; p IL Notice 70 an asent
within the scope OF the agency. 2. Whatever
puts party on inquiry amounts 70 notice :.
Z under 'a Of IS Rss
| as to the existence and nature OF IL.
ar s;s E eo@stoc s Bunting fa kn0 shs..
gerry Is sand q; rors rsr Sc 10, s,re, arma-
tute SANDER II the words used CALCULATED 't to
cause the nearer TO suspect that the party ac-
44s7. Caste VS. shew VermiIIion G. c. AZ
frmed. Robinson. J.-where. upon a complaint
coz heard Se Of s
| trial court will not be interfered with In case
ass. BSnn rs oy p any svi Msnen A.s
| Wiley. p. III. The appearance of the person 70
snee in court judgment without service Of
/ process appearance IN a foreign State against
citizen of this state cannot be enforced In this
zsss George VS.. Hurst. sullivan c. c. Re-
| client to his lawyer are privileged and cannot
| be inquired into. 2. A letter which Is no more
s.sO, Gro1b VS.: smith. Lawrence c. C A.
| nrrned comstock. il One may assume the
guarantee and indorsement. 2. Where an IN
sr sn sy se for the
isss: Green VS. McGrew Huntington c. C.
/ to dismiss appeal in open court
Minutes
| 442o. Frances N. Howe Edward White e
al. Allen s; c.. Appelees petition to transfer
ass. City OF Hammond VS.. Harriet winslox.
Porter S. c. Appellee's petition for oral argu-
ass. Edwin Moore ct al VS.. Frank f. Nelson
| administrator. Lake c. c. Appellants petition
| for extension OF time. Sixty days granted.
ass. Robert NJ. Phillips. trustee. e. al va
| Charles O. Hutchinson et al Porter C. c. No.
| tice OF appeal to clerk and attorney OF record
| served
1918 Terre Haute & Logansport Railway Com
| pany William Erdel. Clinton c. c. Appel
/ lees brief 0)
1925. Consumers Gas Company vs.. T'haddeus
/ M Moore. Madison s. G. Appeees brief al
| lss5 City of New Albany vs. Joseph Stier
Floyd c. c. Appellants brief Cs)
1 New Suit
| 5o7s. Southern Railway Company vs. jacob
w. Davis. administrator. Crawford c. c. REQ
ord. Assignment OF errors In term. Bond.