The Hawaiian star. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu]) 1893-1912, 1903-11-12
LORD LANSOOWNE
ANO THE BOER WAR
TELLS WHAT THE OFFICE WAS
CALLED ON TO DO AND WHAT
IT DID.

Office prior to and during the Buer
war said with reference to the resigna-
tion of General Sir w. Butler ! eX-
pressed the opinion that it would
! be desirable to accept this re-
! signation. | did not doubt Sir w. But
| ler's sincerity, nor dispute his right to
| hold his own opinions with regard to
questions of South African policy, but
at such a crisis it was absolutely nee
essary the Sir Alfred aiilner and Gem
eral Butler should be on terms of mu-
| tual confidence, and that their relations
should be known to be of cordial
! character 1t was notorious that they
disagreed. and in ny opinion the ILL
assorted union should be terminated as
soon as possible.
| Answering questions as to the pre-
parations for war, Lord Lansdowne put
/ in a memorandum of May 21st, 1900,
with regard to the serious deficiency in
| our reserves of armament and military
stores He appointed Sir Henry Brack-
enbury at the beginning of 1899 to in
| quire into the matter, but before Sir
Henry had completed ais investigation
the war broke out, and brought to
| light the melancholy extent of our de-
( ficiencies." In December, 1899. sir
Henry made his report, and laid before
of things which he correctly described
as full of peril to the Empire The
condition of things was so grave that 1
/ at once referred it to the Defence Com
mittee of the Cabinet, by which ii was
considered at meetings held during the
month of January. The Chancellor of
the EXchequer urged, and l thought
most reasonably, that we ought not to
accept proposals involving an expendi-
ture of many millions, upon the repre-
sentation of a single official of the War
Office The matter was then referred
to two Departmental Committees, who
recommended an expenditure of 1OA
millions out of liz millions recon-
mended by Sir Henry Brackenbury.
I Sir Henry Hicks Besch strongly OPP
posed great deal of this expenditure;
and Lord Lansdowne added that if the
/ views of the Chancellor of the Exche-
quer were adopted they would seri-
ously hamper the War Office in giving
effect to the policy of the Cabinet"
Asked if the deficiency of stores had
been of long standing before the war.
Lord Lansdowne replied that that was
so. Lord Wolseley said in a memoran-
dunn, that we were better found at
the beginning of the late war than we
had ever been found before" but that
did not prove we had enough.
Asked by the Chairman Oord Elgin)
as to whether Lord Wolseley agreed
in the proposal that came from Sir
Henry Brackenbury's inquiry Lord
Lansdowne said LORD Wolseley was
certainly aware of it, and concurred in
it.
1t is clear from Lord Lansdowne's
evidence that the representations of
T.Nsgl Vols i. ca
We're laid by him before the Cabinet,
but overridden by the latter, in the
hope that war might still be averted
and the expense of taking the neces-
sary steps to make the Army ready
for the field saved, In justification of
avoiding all preparations which might
alarm the Beers and precipitate war
Lord Lansdowne brings out the strong
representations Sir w. Butler made
against any steps whatever. The evil
dence of the latter officer is chiefly re-
markable for it's extreme bias towards
the Boer point of view. From the doe
uments quoted 1T would not appear
that Sir w. Butler ever suggested that
a larger force would De necessary tn,
10000 men; most of his warnings"
were really vague denunciations of the
character of the war as likely to be a
The general observation l would
make, is we were obliged to consider
that advice with some reference to the
( circumstances as they presented them
selves at the moment we received it.
! We certainly did not regard peace as
unattainable; on the contrary, there
We're moments we believed that we
We're very near a settlement which
would have avoided all the misfortunes
inseparable from a great war, and we
realized very deeply indeed that owing
| to the inflammable state of public on
inion in South Africa, we ought to
strain every effort to avoid any action
which was likely to precipitate HOSTILE
ties.
Sir George White, in the course of his
evidence, said: Il would like to sub
NIT to His Majesty's Commissioners
that my resolve to hold Ladysmith and
IT'S successful accomplishment resulted
IN the complete overthrow of the Boer
plan of campaign. That plan was to
/ overwhelm the British in Natal before
their reinforcements could arrive. and
by rapid coup conquer that province
to the sea. The overthrow of that plan
had been accomplished even before the
reinforcements landed. During the
! time the Beers could have carried out
their plan they were held at Lady
smith. The holding of Ladysmith.
therefore, saved Natal. NY task was
thus fulfilled. If could keep the Beers
round Ladysmith, and thus preserve
the integrity of Natal as a province, its
capital city of Maritzburg and its sea-
port at Durham, during the interval
when the Beers power OF early mobili-
cation and concentration on Natal en-
abled them to attack with greatly SUI
perior numbers, l had every confidence
that after the interval the greater re-
sources of the British Empire would
be put forth to help my force. l can
not justly be held responsible for the
losses incurred in the relief.
on the question OF Treasury control
of the War Office demands, Mr.. Brok-
rick was asked if the Treasury was not
unduly hampering, and he replied: IT
think the relations of the War Office
and the Admiralty with the Treasury
have been immensely improved in my
recollection. The refusals by the Treas
ury are infinitely less now than they