Evening journal., 1903-05-08
FOR TRIAL
AND ARGUMENT
May Term CT the Superior
Court Will Be a Long
One
MANY CIVIL CASES ON CALENDAR
Suits Against the Jessup and Moore
Paper Company Growing Out Of
Delaware Pulp Works Explosion
for Trial.

The May term OF the Superior Court
which opens on Monday May %. promises
to be an unusually long one as there IS a
large amount OF civil business ITO be dis
posed Of. The judges assigned to the May
term are Chief Justice Lore and Judges
Grubb and Pennewill. The calendar re-
Gently issued contains 1856 causes for trial
and AZ for argument.
The cases for trid1- are as follows: r.
T. Warner VS.. Sarah S. England: John
MacFarlane VS.. Garrett and Barr; VIII
liam +. Anderson VS.. Delaware Construc-
uon Company; John w. and Mary Il. PEN
ningaon VS.. John e. Lewis; Martha l..
Cannon for the use OF William Sutton VS..
p, w. and B. r. r. Co.; W. and n. r.
r. Dairymen's Protective Association vs..
George w. Cooley; John II. Dagger VS..
William il. Churchman: William II. Mas
sey, adm. VS.. Diamond State Steel Co.
Courtand Wagon co. VS.. John p. SPRING
er's admir-; Horace Vaughn vs. Alexander
Maxwell; w. and N. r. r. Co. VS.. Ar
thur r. kee; Margaret Conner. by her
next friend Michael j. Conner VS.. Peo-
pies Railway Company; Jennie e. Black
burn vs.. II. Blumenthal and CO.; Robert
Guy VS.. James Richardson; Raffaelo Di
Guglielmo vs.. NJ. Megary and Son; Meter
Brothers VS.. Harry j. stoeclde; use OF
Thomas d. Lyman. Florence NJ. serwson
vs.. Connecticut Fire ms. Co.; same VS.
Mutual Fire ms. Co.; Alexander Fabeo VS.
Standard Lime and Stone Co.; Very
Preston VS.. John Norris Robinson; WA.
liam c. Lattomus VS.. William T.. Haw.
kins; Artemus Smith VS.. Wilmington Saw
!ngs Fund Society; Martin e. Smith VS.
Frank C. Sadham; f. Blumenthal and
Co. vs.. p. w. and b. r. r.. Co. Edward
j. Finn VS.. same; Joseph H. Blatz'l
admr. VS.. same; Charles l.. Walker VS.
Delaware Cran5te and Mining Co. WI
liam II Klair VS.. p. w. and B. r.. r
Co.; United States use of Innbam ane
Bro. VS.. John Jacoby, Joseph L. Carpen
ter, Jr., and John p Almond: Beatric,
Leitch vs.. Sue c.. Elicit; Albert Franldsl
VS.. Sue G. Elliott; Thomas Burns VS.
James NJ. Cleaver; John +. AIcWhortei
vs.. William T. Money; Charles Pratesi vs.
Mayor and City Council; Margaret Quinn
by her next friend vs.. Peoples Railwa,
Company; James Quinn VS.. same; Miner
allied Rubber Co. vs.. Phoenix Fire Co.
I sAHie a. 4NvHilleuA VS. EtQplC5 IktlMMdA
Co.; Henry T. Schuchler vs.. Robert Co.
burn Dickson's admr. Charlotte NJ. Boud
win vs.. Wilmington City Railway Co.
/ Eugene Massey vs.. The Every Eveninl
Publishing Co.. John J. Walsh VS.. Afichae
Walsh; Joseph HILBERT vs.. Guardian S
and L. Association; Walter McFeat',
admr. vs.. p, W. and b. r. r. Co.; Eliza
beth Ambrose VS.. New Castle and Della
ware City Railway Co. James c. Tgne
VS.. Diamond State Steel Co.; Philip Rey
bold VS.. Denny Bros; Paul l.. Lengel VS.
Bush and Ragner; James w. England
next friend vs.. Peoples Railway Co.
Ephraim A. Schnaizenberg VS.. Diamoni
State Steel Co. ; Alfred Crossan VS.. Georg
W. Dunlap; Charles Z. Sparks VS.. Ceorg
NJ. Moss; Theodore Becker VS.. Bartgis an
Bros; Diamond State Steel Co. vs.. Mat
thew Valentine; Margaret Mea VS.. Tn
(Conffnuad On Civfh nacan