The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1903-09-24
THE CIRCUIT COURT.
OF THE SECOND
WEEK OF ITS SESSION.
The Civil Docket Completed Last Friday
Criminal Docket Now Being Consid-
ered-Grand jury Report-That Body
Discharged Saturday.

The following cases have been dis
posed of since our last report:
TRIAL DOCKET.
No. IA. John Felty, Jr., VS.. M. B. &
d. w. Smith; judgment as per sched-
ule annexed; Heindell and Peddicord
-Hamill and Semmes.
No. Is. John Felty, Jr., VS.. NJ. B. &
d. W. Smith; tried before the court;
judgment in favor of the plaintiff for
$329.7j; PeddIcOrd and Heindell-
Semmes and Hamill.
No. II. Bear Creek Lumber Co. VS..
Samuel Hutson continued Gordon
-Hamill.
No. IS. A. b. Laraway VS.. H. q G.
Holiday; continued at the cost of the
defendant; eddicord-Hamlll.
No. 10. H. w. Hessen VS.. William
Casteel; stet; Sincell and Heindell-
Hamill.
No. 20. State use d. A. Stephens VS..
Leyi Echard and others tried before
the court; judgment in favor of the
plaintiff for 1000 to be released on
the payment of $50; Heindel, Sincell
-Semmes.
81, Adams, Rowley & Co. VS. George
Bittinger; continued; Sincell-Ham-
i'll.
%, Same VS. Lydia BarkhoIder; con-
tinued; Sincell-Hamill.
SO, l.. T. Yoder VS. Elmira Hine-
baugh; continued; Hamill-Mitchell.
"a, Ephriam Folk VS. Noah New
man; non pros; non payment of costs;
eddicord-Hamill
%, Samuel D. Glotfelty VS. same;
non pros; non payment of costs; abat-
ed; Peddicord-Ramill.
26, William H. Ebaugh VS. same;
non pros; for non payment of costs;
eddicord-Hamill
81, Odds Wagon Co. VS. E. G. w. Ry-
land; judgment of condemnation as
per schedule annexed; Hamill-Ped-
dicord.
%, Same VS. same; appearance of
plaintiff stricken out and pleas with
drawn; Hamill-Peddicord
30, Rachel Broadwater VS. S. E.
Broadwater; settled upon payment of
$1,000 by defendant to plaintiff, each
party to pay own costs; Peddicord-
Hamill.
30, George S. Warwick VS. P. S. Fa-
cenbaker, tried before the court; ver-
dict for the defendant; Hamill, Sem
mes-Sincell.
81, Felty & Pritchard VS. Gauer u
Harvey; continued by agreement;
| eddicord-Sincell
80, Same VS. Nathaniel B. Harvey;
continued by agreement; Peddicord-
Sincell.
SO, Jasper Augustine VS. Cornelius
W. Friend; non pros under rule Sc
curity for costs; Thayer, Peddicord-
Hamill.
"a, County Commissioners VS. l..
Nydegger, continued by agreement;
Sincell-Hamill.
80, E. G. Perrin VS. Sarah Ashby;
continued; Mitchell-Hamill.
Sc, Sarah Kerfoot VS. West, Dodson
& Co.; stet; eddicord-Sincell,
81, Same VS. Monroe Mining Co.;
warrant of resurvey issued and con-
tinued; eddicord-Sincell.
SO, Jennings Bros. VS. Meadow
Mountain Co., continued, Hamill-
Gordon.
80, James r. Bishop VS. Truman
| Casteel; tried before the court and
judgment for the plaintiff for $672.O2;
Hamill.
40, E. 6. Perrine VS. John B. Brown
ing; scontinued; Sincell-Offutt, Rem
ninger.
40, B. H. Sincell VS. John Shartzer;
tried before the court and judgment
for the plaintiff for $217.96 Sincell
40, National Bank of Pa. VS. G. and
H. Holiday: judgment under the
rule; Hamill.
"A, Mary E. Chisholm VS. Charles
Deale; tried before the court and
judgment for the defendant; Thayer,
Sincell-Peddicord
45, Anthony Burke VS. Mamie E.
Burke; non pros;-Sincell.
46, John Henry Beckman VS. j. G.
Beckman; continued; Hamill-Ped-
| dicord.
AZ, Truman Root VS. The Bear Creek
Lumber Co.; Renninger-Hamill
As, J. Power Allen VS. Wilson E.
Brown; continued at cost of defend
ant; Peddicord-Renninger.
40, William H. Smouse VS.. b. g. o.
Railroad Co.; continued; Peddicord-
Hamill.
so, Mary E. Casteel VS. j. Alvin
Friend settled; Hamill-Thayer.
81, Stephen G. Mattingly VS. P. T.
Cartwright; continued on motion of
defendant; eddicord-Hamill.