The Minneapolis journal. [volume] (Minneapolis, Minn.) 1888-1939, 1903-01-09
authorized, and his failure tosdo 30 amounts to
4 fraud In law &its
Order reversed and new trial granted.

I fraud IN law. ~ ''.--l,'S3.
Order reversed and new trial srs ssss1n
Waseea County.
John veum, as Administrators of the Estate OF
Peter o. Hong, Deceased, Respondent, W.
Martin Sheeran, APPELLANT, Is ssfs
ned and a i i held the ffs findings Of the
trial court are sustained By the evidence, and
respect to the admission or exclusion Of evidence
OH the trial. -,
Order affirmed. Brown, ].
Hennepin County.
vs. HI O. Akeley, appellant. 8
Where surety In e contract Of Indemnity
principal a building contractor, to pay debts
notified Of an action against the obligee to
conducts the litigation to its fnal discrimination,
the judgment therein Is final and conclusive
s &c liability g 81 tie s as sst's sHS s.tsn
Brown J.
Morrison County.
George V. Clark, respondent, VS.: B. F. Ander.
son, appellant.
right to perfect lien for labor or. material
furnished in the construction of a building under
with the tS ts does not Until
which the owner may demand OF the contractor
a vsrifi d statement OF the amounts due from
him to laborers or material-men under him; and
lien statement filed prior to- that time is in
efectual and invalid.
or others to whom, anything, is due from the
contractor for work upon or material used In
the OF It hf he building doe; not
none such. verified statement accordingly will
be sufficient conn lance with the statute
.r5.:.~ sherburnes County.
Albert Q. whitney, appellant, vs., Henry G. Bal
Albert G. whitney, appellant, VS.. Vernon c.
| Bailey respondent.
Laws 1881, chapter is5-the Forfeiture tax sale
of 1ss1--the sale actually took place in the
such sale In which the place designated was '.at
the court house, was sufficient compliance, as
TO- the place Of sale With the requirements , Of
1t was recited that the sale was lat the court
house" sufficiently conforms in respect to place
second--The sale in question formally and
properly opened IN small room on the groun6
the auditor announced that, to accommodate the
| present that this room was filled and crowded
we'll a. tns n iesa aass,s to It unable
these reasons were absolutely prevented from
the Auditor announced that. to accommodate tn
bidders, and for the purposes of the sale, hi
office would be moved temporarily to the court
room upstairs. Those present sthereupon re
paired to the courtroom and all subsequent
sales were made therein. 49,. -,
!
itors office for the time being and for the pur
poses Of the sale. and that the law as to the
Of SALE tho
| quent list for the current year published
| In part in newspaper and. in part--the con
/ Guiding porton-in supplement to said paper
that the forfeited list which followed the cur
| rent list. and was wholly In the supplement
vas legally published Judgment affirm, affirmed IL
Stearns County. ,,,. -
Elizabeth Enneking; Respondent. vs. Bernard
Woebkenberg ct al, Defendants; Bernard
| Woebkenberg. Appellant.
i In an action for the conversion Of promtssor!
note it is held that the evidence sustaink Thu
verdict of the jury to. the effect that the not'
was delivered to the plaintiff by the maker ant
that she Is the owner thereof -, -.. 4.
I Order affirmed. Start, c., J.
i Morrison: County. ..- ~
Jacob Greengard, Respondent, vs.. Nellie Burton
X Appellant. -. -;,,s, -, - -
For reasons stated in the opinion, a new tria
is ordered in this case. Per Curtain.