Ottumwa semi-weekly courier. [volume] (Ottumwa, Iowa) 1899-1903, 1903-08-11
tiff by defendants. Williams & Will
Iiams, plaintiffs attorneys.

tiff by defendants. Williams & Will
liams, plaintiffs attorneys.
May Armstrong VS. Irwin Armstrong,
petition for divorce Plaintiff states
that she and defendant were married
in September, 1898, at Mankato, Mimi,
and that October 20, 1900, defendant
deserted her. She charges cruel and
inhuman treatment. B. w. Scott, at
torney for the plaintiff.
Mary Bagnall VS. George ,Bagnall,
petition for divorce. Plaintiff states
she and defendant were married Sep
TENDER 5, 1895. She charges defend
ant with cruel and inhuman treat
ment and stated that he compelled her
to sign a deed for the real estate. She
asked for divorce from the defend.
ant and asks for the custody OF
their son, Daniel Bagnall. Jaques C
Jaques, attorney for the plaintiff.
Elmire Crosse VS. l. G. Crosse, petition
for divorce. Plaintiff states that she
and defendant were married in Ottum-
wa February 3, 1903, and since that
time defendant has become an habitual
drunkard and she asks for divorce
and that she may be restored to her
maiden name, Elmira Taylor. w. w.
Rankin, plaintiffs attorney.
Chestina Coral VS. John q Coral, Pc
tition for divorce. Plaintiff states that
she and defendant were married in
Keokul1 county, December 25, 1880.
Plaintiff accuses defendant of cruel
and inhuman treatment. E. K. Dough
erty, plaintiffs attorney.
Dora Blachley VS. Charles Blachley,
petition for divorce. Plaintiff states
that she and defendant were married
January %, 1901, in Ottumwa. She
accuses defendant of cruel and inhu-
man treatment The defendant filed
an answer to the plaintiffs petition, in
which he denied the statements set
forth and asks for dismissal of the
case. B. w. Scott, plaintiffs attorney
and Seneca Cornell, attorney for the
defendant.
Melissa ]. Booz VS. Alonzo p Booz
petition for divorce. Plaintiff states
that she and the defendant were mar.
rier at Ottumwa May 80, 1900. She
charges the defendant with cruel and
inhuman treatment. j. A. Lowenberg
attorney for plaintiff.
jeanette G. Brown VS. Chas. w
Brown, petition for divorce. Plaintiff
states that she and the defendant were
married at Ottumwa April IL, 1901
Non-support is given as the grounds
for the action. She asks for divorce
and alimony in the sum of 50 1000. w
W. Epps, plaintiffs attorney.
Leona Cox VS. Oren Cox, petition foI
divorce Plaintiff in her petition states
that she and the defendant were mar
ried at Ottumwa September 16, 1901
She charges the defendant with crue
and inhuman treatment and non-sup
port Plaintiff asks for divorce and
that she be restored to her maiden
name of Leona Young. McElroy & Nc
Elroy, attorneys for plaintiff.
r. D. Euber VS.. H. d. Euber, petit
ton for divorce. Plaintiff states that
she and the defendant We're married
October s, 1897, at Ottumwa. She gives
cruel and inhuman treatment and hab
itual drunkenness as the grounds fol
the action She asks for divorce
and the custody of a minor son. B
w. Scott, attorney for plaintiff. The
defendant filed a cross bill for di
yorce in which he accuses his wife o.
leading dissolute life. s
June Findley VS. o. L.. Findley, peti
| ton for divorce. Plaintiff states tina
she and the defendant We're married
February %, 1898 She gives statu
| tory charge as the grounds for the ac
ton. Plaintiff asks for a divorce ant
! the custody of their minor child
/ Judge Roberts issued a temporary in
junction against the defendant to re
strain him from disposing of certain
property pending the hearing o.
the case Jacques & Jaques, attorney!
| for plaintiff.
Mary A. Dowty VS. Daniel Dowty, pc
1 tition for divorce In her petition
| plaintiff states that she and the defend
! ant were married at Creston, Decem
ebr Is, 1899 She charges desertiol
and cruel and inhuman treatment A
1 w. Enoch, plaintiffs attorney.
Alice Streeby VS.. Andrew j. Stree
1 by, petition for divorce. Plaintiff ant
defendant were married in ST. Joseph
! Mo-, in December, 1892 Plaintiff ac
cuses defendant of non-support, de
I sertion and she also makes a stat
utory charge. She asks for a divorce
/ and the custody of their minor child
B. w. Scott attorney for plaintiff.
Nettie Wells VS.. Calvin Wells, petit
ton for divorce. Plaintiff states tina
she and defendant were married at OF
/ tumwa November "a, 1902 She ac
cuses the defendant of cruel and in
human treatment and non-support
/ She asks for divorce and that sh,
be restored to her. maiden name, Net
! tie Lopeman. B. w. Scott PLAINTIFF
attorney.
Evelyn Roland VS.. R. H. Roland
petition for divorce. In her petition
the plaintiff states that she and de
PENDANT were married May 10, 1903
in this city She claims that the de
PENDANT treated her inhumanely an,
that he drove her from their home
month after their marriage. She ask
permanent alimony in the sum of ST.
500. S. e. Adler attorney for plain
1 tiff
Gertrude Knowlton VS.. Albert E
Knowlton, petition for divorce. In he
petition the plaintiff states that sh
and defendant were married at OF
/ tumwa in 1902. She gives cruel an,
4 inhuman treatment as grounds for tn
action. She asks for a divorce, tina
she be awarded house and lot, val