The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1903-10-06


space in your valuable paper for de-
layed answer to a communication is
sued in your local of June 3rd, 1903,
signed by one observer" &c Makaai
au), who makes an extreme effort in
scheming to bring my name into dis
repute before an uninterested public,
merely for personal reasons, and i'll
feelings, which 1 took no heed of at
that time in obedience to the mother
of the young Princess Kapiolani. l at
tempt not then to use my pen, being
strictly forbidden to; but why do these
people in their supreme impudence
scheme to betray me and my family of
our birth rights? Rest assured that
what they claim is not their right.
What I claim is ours. Their Royal
Highnesses which this Observer evil
IDENTIFY claims to be a crown Prince.
Mahaoi! 1t would be ridiculous were
it not done with malicious intent and
it's only a further proof of their evil
dent ignorance of ancient Hawaiian
traditions, handed down from Maweke
Observation-Disclosures, and his second
wife, Komokilaikawaihono
sister to Kauhiiliula -a-Piilani, and to
their grandson Naohulenui. May l ask
if this observer" is one of their
grandsons or daughters? IF not why
not?'' 1t is well known fact that in
former days it was death to approach
Naohulenui and his son, Kaihumua,
who were residing in Kona, Hawaii, and
his family. These are the ancestries of
Mrs Mary Wahikaahuula-o-K alanio-
Abigail Kuaihelani Campbell-Parker,
and others, whose lineage is brought
into question by this Observer" and
promptly criticized June IS by an Eek
pert genealogist, self-made chief of
little consequences, who in their first
attempt in genealogical discussions
leaves me as sole judge Of the premises.
The point in question being a dispute
over simple matter, respectfully an
infant which is commonly used in
all occasions for a new born child, rich
or poor.
Furthermore what earthly use are
those royal titles to the public and the
missionaries who have the true history
of the Hawaiian Islands, now part of
L. S. domain, given and suppressed by
Minister Stevens in a letter to Secre-
tary of the State Foster during Presi-
dent Harrison's administration. For
this reason it would be impossible to en-
ter into any controversy with such his
torical experts as a John Smith, VINO
makes an error in airing his views for
want of confidence nevertheless, as far
as l am concerned. My forefathers
and mothers were Kings and Queens.
My mother is a true lineal descendant
of Kalaniopuu by his son kauikeaou1
Kiwalao. He married his half sister
Kalanikauikikilo Xalaniwaiakuaw alka-
nakaole; she was the daughter OF ka-
mehameha the Great through savage
marriage (Hoao). He married his own
sister Kalolanui. their daughter who in
those days was one of the very highest
tabu chiefs on whom the sun was not
permitted to shine and who unless with
extraordinary precautions only moved
about when the sun was so low as not
She was the mother of my great great
grandmother, Observation-Disclosures.
Hikawainui; their names are also men
toned in the Kooulikookeakalani
chants. The meles are we'll known by
many old retainers of which l have a
copy given me by my mother. My
great great grandmother. Kilioulani-
nuiamamaohikawai married Kappa
kahilinuiaehu a chief warrior. He
was the great grandson of kauhiaka-
ma. grandson of Neutrality-suspicious.
kea, and son of Observation-Disclosures
hienaenanuiaeh She was born at Pa
kaalaneo. Maui, after the death of
KuaIii. King Of Oahu. Kiwalao. the
father of Observation-Disclosures by his
aids and counselors demanded the head
of his on-in-Iaw. He claimed that he
was not her equal. The daughter hear
ing of this took refuge with their ret
inues and other high chiefs from Wal
hee and fed over TO Lanilili, kaanapali