The Newtown bee. (Newtown, Conn.) 1877-current, 1903-04-17

| ACAu, LID ucpuUy VI clUIlcI COuSUdUlc y
the town of Newtown in said county
Greeting:
By authority of the State of Con
necticut, you are hereby commanded
to attach to the value of $500 tn,
goods or estate of Ormel E. Morgan
Henry P. Morgan, Merwin D. Morgan
William E. Wakelee, William Morrel
and Luther Stillson, all of said New
town, and Lillian Cook OF the city
county and state of New York, and
them summon to appear before the
Court OF Common Pleas to be holden
within and for the County of Fairfield
on the first Tuesday of May, 1908, then
and there to answer unto Charles M.
Thorpe of said Newtown, in a civil
action wherein the plaintiff complains
and says:
l. On the 23d day of March, 1903,
the plaintiff was the owner in fee of a
certain piece or parcel of land with the
buildings thereon situated in said
Newtown at the district of Gregory IS
Orchard, SO called, containing about
20 acres, more or less, and bounded
northeasterly and east by the turnpike
and old highway and land formerly of
Russell Crofut; south and west by land
of Hiram Barlow and north by land
formerly of Herman Parmelee and
heirs of Abraham Beers.
2. On said day the defendants I'M
lawfully entered upon said land and
erected upon said land small build
ing and caused the same to be occupied
by the defendants William Morrell,
William Wakelee and Luther Stillson.
3. When said building was being
erected, the said defendants .were in
formed that said land belonged to the
plaintiff and were told by the plaintiff
that they must not erect said building
on said land.
4. Said land upon which said build
ing stands is the same land described
in the suit OF the plaintiff against the
defendant, Ormel E. Morgan, which
suit was returned to the Court of Com
mon Pleas for Fairiel County on the
first Tuesday of November, 1901.
S. In said suit, the said Court of
Common Pleas rendered judgment for
the plaintiff on the 18th day of Janu-
airy, 1909, which in effect decreed that
said land belonged to the plaintiff.
6. At the time said building was
being erected, the defendants knew
that said decision had been rendered in
favor of the plaintiff, and that by said
Judgment he was found to be entitled
to said land.
I. Said entry upon said land was
made and said building was erected by
the defendants, solely for the purpose
OF embarrassing, annoying and dam
aging the plaintiff.
s. The said defendants who occupy
said building are continually making
great disturbance and noise in said
building during all hours of the day
and night for the purpose of annoying
the plaintiff.
9. Said building is built in sections,
consists of but one room, and can be
easily removed without any damage to
the same.
10. The plaintiff desires and has
attempted to remove said building
from his said land but is unable to
do so by reason of the force employed
and used by the defendants to prevent
him from moving the same, and also
of their threats to do him bodily harm.
II. Said building is nuisance upon
the land of the plaintiff and of great
damage to the plaintiff.
The plaintiff claims:
l. An injunction against the said
defendants, their servants and agents,
restraining them from maintaining
said building on said land, and from
entering upon or committing any fur
Their acts of trespass upon the same.
2. $500 damages.
The plaintiff is known to the SUBJ
scribing authority to be of sufficient
pecuniary. responsibility to prosecute
this suit, etc.
OF this writ with yelr doings there
on, due service make and return.
Dated at Bridgeport, this 4th day of
April, 1903.
Ebert O. Hull,
Justice OF the Peace
State of Connecticut, County of Fair
field, SIS. Bridgeport, April 4. 1903.
Personally appeared, Mary J. Thorpe,
a competent witness, who being sworn
deposes and says that the allegations
above set forth, are true.
| Mary J. Thorpe.
| Before me,
Ebert O. Hull,
Justice of the Peace.