Arizona republican., 1903-10-07
DISTRICT COURT
Eckel Indicted, Balenzuela Case ig-
 nored-Disposition Of Other Cases

The grand jury yesterday returned an indictment against W. l.. Eckel charging him with child stealing. Eckel it will be remembered cloped to California some months ago with the daughter of his brother. was arrested and brought back and is now in GUS tody. The charge against Miguel Ba- lenzuela was ignored. Balenzuela was arrested at Gila Bend for an alleged burglary. Three new eases were also filed. One was an appeal by the plain tiff in a. case known in Justice Robert sons court as J. T. Bailey versus J. M. Langston. in which the defendant was given a judgment of $2f.31. The story of it is that MT. Langston employed MT. Bailey to care for Q piece of prop eTty. In the course of events Bailey sued for sl1S.70 wages and $25 for the use of q horse. The defendant put in 2 claim for provisions. damages, etc. amounting to $251.5O. Some of the items were thrown out and the plain tiff's bill deducted from the rest. leav- ing the judgment of $24.31 in Lang stons favor, whereupon Bailey ap- pealed.
 R. D. Wooddell filed suit against Laur2bel Gardiner. eXecutriX of the es- tate of J. J. Gardiner. for $230 alleged to have been borrowed by Mir. Gar diner and S4.75 on account both oi which bills had been presented to the eXeCutriX and payment refused.
 Restraining orders were granted in inc cases Of C. Rodney Mcdonald and George H. Newsholme, who each filed a suit against the Salt River Valley company on grounds similar to those in the Van Fossen case in which tenn porary restraining order was granted with the provision that winter water should ba bought by plaintiffs at $4 per inch for the present season.
 The case of l. K. Bolton vs. Granville Garrett was dismissed for want of prosecution.
 In the caso of F. " Wilbur ct al versus the Utah c. F! X E. Co.,, tho temporary injunction was made per manent.
 The cases of F. Metcalf vs Lulu Simpson and The Farmers and Mer- chants bank vs. c. A. Howe were both continued for the term on the motion of plaintiffs.
 A large numb Der of oi1 water cases against the north side canals were dis missed for want of prosecution. the objects sought having been covered by cases more recently instituted.
 The following cases were continued for the term:
 Nj West vs Charles L. Springer.
 Emma C. Converse vs. A. J. Ed wards.
 Charles Goldman ct al. vs. F. F. CIune.
 The following cases were dismissed
 Orchard Grove Investment co. vs. ]. H. McClintock. arising out of the change of location of the postofice.
 J. C. Reed vs. A. Young, on motion of plaintiff.
 Clara A. Evans vs. Sarah G. Evans. for want of prosecution.
 The following cases were passed for second call:
 A. F.. Ruff vs. Daisy E. Ruff
 w. W. Edwards vs. Harry Troops.
 Pauline w. Solomonson vs. Louis Melczer.
 c. X Dohson vs. A. T. Houston ct al.
 Axel W. Hallenborg vs. Greene Con soiidated Mining Co. r. K. Hickey vs. May F. Farrington.
 Laura A Ware vs. A. G. Utley. Charles F. Lovett vs. Niarilla J. Lovctt
 T.. the case of Charles Bauer vs. Au- gusta W. Bauer. George Purdy Bul- i lord was entered as attorney Cor plain tiff.
 The case of Rebecca Salari vs. w. c. Robbins was continued on plaintiffs motion.
 CASES SET FOR TRIAL. Libbie Goodwin vs. ?. L. Sherman ! et al. November F. P L. sherman ct al vs. J. Wilson ct 2l. November 19.
 James Bonthron ct al vs. P. l.. <. E. Co.,. November 20.
 George w. Sanders vs. Phoenix Railway company. November r.
 George W. Kretzinger vs. Waiter Iund ct al November 16. Lizzie BIooller vs. Phoenix Water 1 company November 16. , Eastern Sugar company vs. s. O. | Terry. November IT.
 Lamb Fruit company vs. John Hcdgren ct al. November IS. l George $. Ford vs. s. r, P. X r. Hallway company. November IS. |, ". H. Stillwel vs. old Dominion i Copper company. November 16. l D. A. Tyrrer vs. F. M. Bank ct al. November 13.
 Augustus B. Kellogg vs. J. Henry l Wood, November II. ! William Dufield vs. L. A. Card, November II. In re est Josephine Elvey, deceased. 1 November r.
 Leon Bouvicr vs. Jack Gibson ct al. November 3. i The CIawson company vs. l.. D. i Mcclure. November F.
 George W. Nichols vs. w. $. Apple | by ct al. November 1.
 George W. Kretziuger vs. Robert F | Wagons. November }. 1 In re est Thomas k. Elvey, deceased. ! NOvem ber ..
 Iron Hill Mining company vs- Samuel NJ Taylor. November a. Frank A. Blount vs. l.. l.. Plank ct al. November r.