The Montgomery advertiser., 1903-10-04

the introduction of . local bill in the House the full notice and proof was set out at length in the journal of the House, but the ehs,Se notice was not put in full upon the mess ~1 sent to the Senate and therefore did not appear in full upon the
 Senate Journal. The message to the Sem ate. however. did contain a certificate
 that notice and proof appeared on the
 House journal. The same procedure was
 followed In Senate messages. gsi Mir. Thompson said, that 1t was now
 claimed. that the Constitution required
 that notice and proof of all local bills
 should appear in full in the journal of 1 both Houses.
 Speaker Tunstall explained the sending
 of the messages from one House to an-
 other The clerk of the House, he said.
 had omitted the placing of Senate notices
 and proofs upon the House journal
 through a misunderstanding of an inter- view with him. If any harm was done he
 was willing to assume his share of the
 responsibility. Lawyers had differed as to whether all local notices should be set out in full upon the journals of both Houses. If any error had been made 1t
 could be rectified.
 The resolution was then adopted: A second resolution offered by MT. Thompson, authorized the Clerk and one hScaStdhC o WOEh NHhEty-hNc udyS III spreading the Senate notices on the jour-
 nal. This resolution was also passed. A resolution exonerating the clerk from l all blame in the premises was offered and
 was unanimously passed. The bill regulating the sale of stocks of goods in bulk occasioned another debate.
 It was supported by Messrs. Blackburn
 and Goodwin and opposed by Messrs. | Walker and Goldsmith.
 Pharmacy Bill Called up. Mir. Hoffman of. Mobile demanded the consideration of the general pharmacy
 bill as the unfinished business which had | beeh partly considered at the afternoon session.
 MT. Benners said that at that late hour
 of the session 1t would be impossible for | the House to have the bill read intelli- gently and passed upon. This condition.
 he said. was not the fault of the House.
 MT. Hoffman intimated that perhaps the
 gentleman from Jefferson was familiar
 with some of the provisions of the bill.
 He had been told that some of the drug gists of Birmingham were doing the very
 things that were forbidden in the bill. Mir. Starr of Dallas supported the bill
 and explained its provisions. 1t added.
 he said two members to the State Board | of Pharmacy and provided for State
 laboratory at Montgomery without ex- pense to the. State. The bill on motion of Mir. Haley of Jeff
 ferson, was laid upon the table, ayes 4. nays, 2s,
 The majority and minority reports of the Conference. Committee on the Lusk judicial bill were at this juncture submit ted by Mr. Lusk. The majority report
 recommended that the Senate recede both from it's amendment creating Nthe eigh- teenth judicial circuit and the amendment placing Lawrence County in the sixteenth judicial circuit.
 Mir. Thompson of Bibb raised the point of order that this could not be considered as a report.
 Mir. Walker of Madison differed from the gentleman from Bibb on the point of order.
 The Speaker ruled, however. that a unanimous report from the Conference Committee was necessary. In his opinion he said, the report was a nullity. The fajority report was adopted, ayes 3, nays, g.