The times dispatch. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1903-1914, 1903-03-10
TIT / HOUSE MARKS 5.
Oh: Tits COURSE
n Continued From First Page.) {


4 viii be q cali OF the House. Tie friends
II OF Judge Campbell are naturally hard
at work Tho Judge himself is still here,
but he remains In his rooms st the hotel,
and Is evidently taking no personal part
Mr.. H unloy, Of Mathews. Is one OF Judge
a Canpbell's staunchesh supporters. and will
no doubt make n speech against the re-
"A port. g5 ~ RI IA.
gl-Sl There were r,mors OF conferences OF
Judge Campbells friends at the Capitol
q yesterday. but they were denied BY those
whose names were linked with them.
II 81 n. TAX EN- UP PROMPTLY.
VI The House lost no time in taking the
ma tier up yesterday. Shortly after 1t
N was cal led to X order at noon, Speaker
Ryan laid the resolutions and the COM
lnittce reports before the body.
X Mr.. Hunley. Of Ma hews,5 arising to
question OF personal privilege, said ru-
y NOR to the effect that he would DO Judge
u Campbelrs leader onss the floor-of the
Z IA ouse having been published In the press,
ss$she desired to make known his true status
ss5lI was only one of q large nun Der VINO
think that the facts proved are not SUM
cient to justify the removal OF Judge
il Campbell from Office, however deserving
Il OF censllre he may be- So far as he was
aware; judge Campbell had no particular
II leader 81 There was no reason. NJ Hun
81 ley& said . why he should be SO regarded;
4 for, living In a section remote from AM
%herst, no only had a pleasant ncquaint-
Sance with Judge Campbell in public life.
II and the Judge had no claim on him what
ever. personal or political. .
u s Continuing Mr.. 2Hundley said he intend
St I, act in the case according to his own
n convictions, without regard to Judge
Camrbells wishes. He hoped that no one
would wait for him to lead. but that al
who are opposed to the removal OF
Judge Campbell would unite with him IN
con.ending for what they believe to Dc
fair and right.
II MIR. 5FoLKEs' MOTION.
"a Mi. Tolkes moved that the House pro-
RI cced to consider the Campbell case. eliHl-
all the specifications save those
4 ,,,,ol which the findings Of the commit
tee were unanimous
s65. Here was the first blush In the case.
and Colonel Lee took the other side and
\ advocated the adoption OF the majority
report.
s5stf MIR. Folkes made a strong speech. and
became involved in a colloquy with Mr..
4 Sipe. in which the two members became
NJ q little fiery. Mr.. Folkes thought the
lines should be clearly defined once Tor
ali, and he saw no use of bringing IN OIL
Is tho charges upon which the committee
themselves were not agreed. Mr.. Sc
a brell, OF the committee. said the question
* was a very plain one. and was simply
to determine upon which specifications
Judge Campbell should be tried 84.H
He saw no use for delay but thought
the body should proceed at once to per-
feet the charges. /. j
ss91 Mr.. Davis. having. charge OF the ma.
iority report. made brief speech. in
which he VERY clearly defined the present
status of'the case. Iti .B3
55ss, UPON ITS MERITS.
Before he got through. Mr.. Davis en-
tered slightly upon the merits fthe case.
Il Mr. Cardwell suggested that the cues
ton OF specifications he voted upon sepa-
II rately and Mr.. Davis proceeded with his
4. speech He thought the four charges made
IN the majority report had heen fully
proved, and he therefore commended that
they should DO adopted. Mr.. Davis said
d he had given the utmost consideration
TO the case. and 1t was now up to- the
House.
Messrs. Charles T. Bland and Edwards
spoke for the motion OF Mr.. Folkes, and
MIR. Sipe made strong speech for the
adoption Of the majroity report. @
report.
He said It was sought here to emascu'
@Slate the report Of the committee and &c
ID eliminate the liquor charge. which. ne
IA thought, was most serious one, and tc
strike it ont was to weaken the report
Mr.. Southall offered resolution ms q
substitute for the motion OF Mr. Folkes
providing that each Of the specifications
I'LL be voted upon separately. E4
MOTION WlTIIDRAWN. 6AF
a. Mr.. Folkes withdrew his motion nnf
his resolution. He thought IT was bat
policy for the House to vote upon the re-
port as a whole, and that unless acted
upon as he had suggested the precedcn
was one that would rise up to smite tn
r. House later on.
Mr. Davis replied In strong speed
against Mr.. Southall's motion. ana IN
@mnmber from Amelia and Mr.. Spc 20
into something OF ~ wrangge the forme
taking strong ground in favor OF ludg
Campbells removal. but Insisting that IN
specifications should be voted upon sepa