The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1903-04-30
DIVORCE
PETITIONS
DISPOSED OF
Large Number Decided by
Judge Dubois by Whom They
Were Heard.

The divorce trials are proceeding rap
idly and good number OF cases IN "hioi,
there is no opposition have been hearu
by Judge Dubois In the appellate diVisioh
OF the supreme court s-,,.,,,,.
The cases heard included the folloWlnB
Margaret H. GeelIn vs. John Geehh.
continued drunkenness and neglect 20
provide; granted. Il. II. Farrell for the
petitioner. -. a.,
Bertha TuIy against John Tully'
neglect 10 urovlde decision for the petl-
toner. Peter G. Cannon Tor the peu-
EttabelIe d. Davis VS.. Durward c. Da-
Wis continued drunkenness and neglect
10 provide: decision for the petltloheT. H.
A. Blake petitioners counsel ss
Augusta K. Shaw vs.. byron u; ShaY,
continued drunkenness and neglect 10
provide: granted. Page * Page Tor the
Alma $. Gibbs VS. Henry II. Gibbs.
neglect to provide; granted. Page ~ Page
for the petitioner
Watson Eager va. Lottie Eager, deser-
ticn; granted. Page d. Page for the Pc
Walter A. Griffith against Olive NJ
Griffith. Decision for petitioner Dc. Z.
Pierce for the petitioner
Ada T.. Dahlberg against Anton Dahl
berg, neglect TO provide. granted. W.
b. Greenough for the petitioner .
Marie l.. Mattox against FRANK w.
MattOx. neglect TO provide; decision Tor
the petitioner. T. +. Farrell Tor the
petitioner.
]. Mccormick neglect TO provide and con-
t!nued drunkenness: decision for the petit
toner. Page and Page for petitioner.
winifred NJ Burke vs.. Edward #.
Burke. neglect 10 provide; decision for pc
titioner Page and Page for the petition
er.
Elizabeth Toole VS. Francis J. Toole.
neglect to provide and continued drunk
enness decision for the petitioner
Mary A. Gardiner against Bradford w.
Gardner. neglect 10 provide: decision for
the petitioner. Page and Page for the pc
tiuoner.
Elizabeth +. Curtis against Lincoln
Curtis neglect 10 provide: decision for
petitioner. c. A. Wilson for petitioner.
To-day a similar batch OF cases were
heard by Judge Dubois. The list being as
follows:
Elmerz Merluge VS. Nodslim Merluge'
neglect to provide. continued drunken
ness and desertion; decision for petitioh-
err Huddy & Easton for the petitioner.
Ferdinanda Martinelli vs.. Guiseppina
Martinelli adultery: decision for the petit
tioner. Thomas Il. Les for the petitioner
Bessie Woodward VS. Froucke l.. Wood
ward resertion and neglect 10 provide; ne-
cislon for the petitioner. l.. n. Hisman Tor
petitioner.
Eva y. Lynch We. Jeremiah P. Lynch.
desertion and neglect 70 provide; decis-
ion for the petitioner ]. A. Williams for
the petitioner.
Grace V. Clemence vs.. Herbert #.
C1emence. continued drunkenness and ne
glect 10 provide: decision for petitioner.
James A. Williams for the petitioner.
Daisy p. Claflin VS.. Benjamin NJ. Claf-
hn neglect 10 provide: decislo nfor the
petitioner Il IT, Lincoln for petitioner
Arthur Stevenson VS.. Catherine Steven
son, continued drunkenness; decision for
the petioner. II. J. Carroll for petition
er
Carrie L. Peck vs.. Herbert A. Peck
neglect TO provide; decision for the pc
utioner. IL. NJ. Bass, Jr.. for the peti-
toner.
Lucy A. Warrington va. Frank r.
Warrington, continued drunkenness and
neglect To provide decision for the petit
toner. Page and Page for the petitioner
Lulu J. Relchhardt VS. Arthur +. o.
Reichhardt, desertion and neglect 10 pro-
vide; decision for the petitioner. Page
and Page for the petitioner.
Annie EfJoyoe VS.. James t. Joyce. con-
unued drunkenness and neglect TO pro-
vide; heard. Page and Page for the petit
-taner,
Frank a. Smith vs. Mary A. Smith.
adultry; decision for the petitioner. Page
and Page for the petioner
Mary l.. S. Johnson vs. James T.. John
son, neglect TO provide; decision for the
plaintiff