Waterbury evening Democrat., 1903-06-11
WINNEGAR AND VANDEMARk

and went to his pool room to pay 1t.
 Cross-examined by MT Williams: The debt was 20 cents for pool and was due from the previous night. He could not say with whom he played pool the night previous. His custom was to visit the place two or three times a week He saw Willis Vandemark there, but not frequently. He often saw Farnsworth there and knew Win. negar, but not James Ennis. Did not know those whom he saw sitting at the stove and knew no reason why he should particularly recall the night of February 26. Winnegar called his at fention to it. He met him on the Wa .tertown road Witness said he made a memorandum of the night of February 2e. Then he said he did not He did not know what a memorandum was. Then he said he did. It was to take a note. Finally he said he could not say if he had written anything about Feb ruary 26, and the next moment he said he had not He spoke to MT OSNeil1 about this matter, also to Howard Den his. To the latter to-day in the hat room. Paid his debt to Wolcott in the pool room. Was positive of that
 !. E. Farnsworth's Story.
 Ira E. Farnsworth was then sworns
 He knew Wolcott was in his pool room the night of the assault Went there little after 10 o'clock Vol colt was there Willis Vandemark and two or three others were there Seymour entered later in the evening. Wolcott, before going out, asked wit ness to remain in the room; that he was sick. and was going home and would not be around until the next day. He then left the room. Did not say what the character of his ill ness was. After Wolcott left witness played pool with Willis Vandemark and in about 20 minutes Farnsworth appeared. Then the three played for about half an hour. Vandenark left the room before Seymour, saying he was going home. It was then about il o'clock Vandemark left about three-quarters of an hour after Vol colt. Was not sure. The question was objected to, but it was claimed to contradict Wlolcott. who testified that the crowd left the room in twos and threes. The question was allowed.
 Cross-examined: Up to January Il witness was employed by the trolley company. He was a conductor and quit work when the strike was de- 3clared. Knew the accused intimately and 1Wiolcott about three years. Ere quently visited his pool room until the time of the arrests, April 2. Did not see Willis Vandemark there very often. Probably once a week. There was no previous arrangement that he should take care of the pool room on the night of February 26. Could not say that he ever met any of the accused there since the strike. The only reason hel had to remember who was there was because he played pool with some of the fellows and it was only night he ever played there that he did not have to settle for its He was positive that Wolcott and Willis yandemark were there that night when he entered. He did not know James Ennis, but did know Ball, James J. and Thomas Quinn Did not know Thorpe or Whitty. Gould not say that Mcclure Brearton, Warren or Winne- gar were there when he entered. Be- lieyed they were not because he would have spoken to them had they been there. He thought Seymour left be fore he did.
 Dennis Allen of ATiddlebury was called after Farnsworth. He is father in-law of Winnegar, and his testimony went to show where Winnegar, his wife and the witness sat when Winne- gar said he was pointed out to Morris sette
 Clifford Vandemark's Story.
 Clifford Vandemark was then called. He told of his whereabouts on the evening of the assault Had supper at about 6 o'clock, after which he went up town with his wife.
 He met Dennis and went as far as corner of Citizens bank with them. Then came back to center look after buses Later he met Winnegar and the two went to the home of Dennis at about 9 o'clock.
 th~ rEn