Evening bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1895-1912, 1903-06-30
MACON AND THOMPSON
CONTINUED from Page ~

FOR n uumnbrevs felt n would no i'm.
rroper. In nv answer in the case in
ne uoIt,s court mada M attack
AGAINST Humpbrevs. Humphrevs at.
Il; cked mo in the most vicious wny and
tbe Indigo would not ston him didn't
want 70 hiring anvone into the case.
hut uumphreys would not have IL ana
continued his TRADE AGAINST me"
Thomnson moved this TRADE testi
n,ony he stricken out.
Andrews didn't see what Tbompsor
obiected IN.
Tho court consulted for several min
u,e,
Tho rulipo was TINT tbero vas no
reason for striking II ont
Thomson; "Haye Won stated all
vcur conversation with uumnhrevs IL
regard 70 the compromise natter"
IAN can remember"
"yybat wos tbera that reouircd Won
| IN consuIt uumnhrevs in regard IN the
Suunor oatter9"
Mopoon smoke os an Affidavit NJ nil.
IIipybam in tho land matter which
might have heen tho sanso of DiIIing.
ham having 10 nav more than other.
vis,
"Tbat's tho only thing or n conf,den.
t,al character. the matter Of a court
record in n case In which had been
| I, terestod. In relation IN an affidavit
nj DilIinpham concerning the Sumner
Land. that might force Dillinsham to
n,v n worry largo sum
in tho insane nroceodi,ys vou emma
in when IL was before Judge Robin.
sono"
"yes. looked nj tho records 4, tho
eouitv suit. think Judpo Robinson
nod Jiscborgod tho coso ayo,pst Sum.
nor nm the ground that no was sane
rho case was transferred There
vere aeveraI amdavi,s N Summers
sanity w 8 Ellis sam Damon and
o,bors declared hin, saro q"
Andrews obiected Tbompson sub-
mitted that no had tho rich, IN And
ont who eIse was IN tho aBdavit
"1mm,tcrial" declared Andrews
1,bomnsop Withdraw
"Whv did Won single out Ellie nc be
Inn on tho, ae,dayi,9"
81 nod Tho, roue In mind"
"Did Won mot onpoar m decIare Sum
Nor insano ,nd af,orwards onroor IN,
hin, 10 dooIoro hin, soneo"
81 apnoared in tho case with Davi,
r. nut Summer nnder guardIansbin
Voc. I'm onr,orInc ,ou, IN doronr
bin,
"yere vou and q navis a,,or
nave In mo ,rus,e. anti for summer p
Two. ="
DurIng n few moments nj what wa,
otherwise s,Ience Tbomnson remarl,
al. CO., Co. ,s ,,o aro oonoarnod ~,
h.yo for roro nj o,aLo thar Tho Alto,
,1v canoraI We hoyo amn,o t,uor
lrdrow, ,bo,,ht ,b;s ro,,a ri, ,,ncaI,
al 90.
Nagoop's attention WINS called d
lt,anscript or evidence IN Ronert vs
sumner shaving Testimony n
rhomnsor and wos asked wbv mn MI
iection was made IN bis On annoarlno
:, a., ,,,,,,io,,,, ,a.o., Ia. rod onna.rad a,
n,ocsd,rc cages for tho EII,ses nm,
sumner
On obiection os Apdraws tho ELI
mart NJ the question was withdrawn.
Mapoon answered.. go could not n,
iect 10 vour being sworn. ,Iidn,
tbink Won had been attorney for SIM
nor" Here Mapoop read from IN
transcript
Thomnsor asLed. "A,ter filing soar
dplous affldayits against attorney,
Won were MT ready for triaI?"
Andrews Objected hut Maroo
vanted IN answer
"I was ready for n trial and sugges
ed night sessions. hut the court wa
not willing aIed n motion 10 bay
ven stricken from the record as atto
new because Won fIled scandalous M
swe,"
"Did vou expect the court to decId
without n bearing?"
Question objected to and withdrawn
= "Did mdge De RoIt reouest Won I
Withdraw the motion?"
yes"
"Didn't no say vou'd have To will
i ,.., -. 49, A.. i.,,,oato, ,.io,ou