Omaha daily bee., 1903-01-13
Intention to Get Down TO Business n
Week Earlier Than Had Been
Planned.

On reconvening district court yesterday
morning Judge ThoTnell ordered that the
petit jury be notified to report on Monday.
January 10, instead Of on January 26. He
also made the following first assignment
of law causes covering the three weeks
from January 10 to February 6, inclusive:
Monday, January 19-McCormick Har-
weston Machine Company against Harcourt;
Lock against City of Council Bluffs; Wen
against Harden; Kissel against c.. b. c. g.
l. Co.
against Especial criminaD Seldom ct al;
Fulton against Costello; Vosss against
Deitchler.
/ Wednesday. January 21-James Moore
against Sells; Joseph against Machan; FL
deity Trust Company against, Mohn.
! Nelson; Alexander against Brown Bros
ct al; German-American Bank against
Friday, January 2s-Martin rgainst Burke
& Casady; Johnson against Union Pacific
Railway Company; Fisher against Chicago.
Rock Island q Pacific Railway Company;
Saturday. January 24-Real Estate and
Trust Company against, lexander; NC
Keown against Handlen; Christensen
| against Herr; Woolfson against Council
Bluffs Produce Company.
Monday, January 26-Hill against Motor
Company; estate of John Patterson, de-
ceased; Brown against Rankin Bros.
Tuesday, January 27-Guardianship Of t.
L. Coleman, minor; Bennett against Motor
Wednesday, January 2S-ostdlck against
(speciaD Chicago, Milwaukee st. Paul
illinois Central Railroad Company.
Thursday, January ALI against
Wabash Railway Company; Schurz against
Nichols, ct al; Bender against Town OF Min
den: McRoberts against Pottawattamie
Friday. January s0-Geeson against sa-
gum; Meek against Pottawattamie County;
| Maloney against Motor Company.
Saturday January Sl-Wickham against
against McClelland; Hoyt against Motor
Monday, February 2-West against Win
surance Company; Petersen against Anchor
Fire Insurance Company.
Tuesday, February S-Thomas against
Motor Company; McEwen against Motor
Company; Long against Fisher.
Wednesday, February +-Mackison against
Frazier; Fogarty against seeley; Bousneld
Thursday, February 5-Kirby against
Kirby; Weatherbee against city of Council
County; Zimmerman against Pottawatta.
mic County; Holden against Pottawattaml
Friday. February eEDasho against Pot,
tawattamie County; State of Iowa against
Nebraska Telephone Company; Baughr
against Napier
In the divorce suit of Nellie E. Kirby
against william Kirby. the defendant yes
terday filed his answer and a cross bill fol
| divorce. Inc answer sets loFlh lhS ioSe'
regarding the former suit brought by th'
defendant for divorce, which was settled
out Of court after he had decided his wifi
a half interest in the farm valued at $4,000
In his cross petition Kirby charges his wifi
with misconduct. and owing to the absence
from the state OF one OF his principal wit
nesses asks for q continuance until mex
term.
Gretchen Cochran. against whom her hus
band. William T. Cochran, brought suit 70
divorce, filed her answer, denying her hus
bands allegations and asks that she b
granted the divorce on grounds OF erue
and human treatment. She also asks 70
the, custody Of their minor children an
l SO a month permanent alimony. Mr.
Cochran further asks the court that he
husband be restrained from interfering wit
0 her in any manner.
Mrs. Hines Fry asks that her suit IL
divorce from Everett Fry, sexton OF I'll
> Walnut Hill cemetery, be redocketed. A
the March term last year Judge Wheele
dismissed the application and ordered thu
Fry be required to support his wife an
children. This, Mrs. Fry alleges, he hs
o failed to do and asks that the suit be n
instated.