The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1903-01-29

edge of the suit the garnishee is not bound
to go further than TO look TO the Jurisdic-
ton act fairly and make full disclosure.
. If judgment in action in garnish-
ment is erroneous and against the de-
PENDANT, he cannot allow IL 10 stand ana
at the same time impeach IL collaterally.
g. Where il is shown that Judgment
is valid upon its face the burden is upon the
person attacking il to show that 1t Is equi-
table to be relieved from it.
1883 Taylor VS.. Patton. montgomery I.
c. Reversed. Bowling il. Section i2sS.
Burns, upon the subject of street improve
ment, contemplates two distinct kinds. one
consisting of the grading ana paving Oh tn 3
and paving of the whole width OF the
street. and city organized under the gem
eral laws for the incorporation OF cities
cannot, by its common council, authorize
any other improvements and charge the
abutting property with the expense of max
ing 1t. 2. Said section provides that the
street may be graded and paved and can.
paved.
1896. Muncie. ETC.. Gas Co. VS.. City OF
Muncie. Randolph c. c. Petition for leave
to amend brief granted.
1879. Nappanee Canning Co. VS.. Reid,
ETC., Co. Elkhart c. c. Motion to retax
costs denied.
Minutes
2OO52 John F. Scott vs. The City OF
Goshen ct al. Elkhart c. c. Appellees
1896. Albert r. Turner ct al vs. State ex
rel Board of Commissioners of Hamilton
County. Marion c. Co. Appellants brief
1871. State ex rel. William r. Moore VS.
The Board of Commissioners OF Clinton
County ct al. Montgomery G. c. Appellees
petition for additional time granted to
1882. Franklin Van Buskirk ct al. VS.
Lydia Slower. Madison G. c. Appellants
petition for additional time granted to Feb
APPELLATE COURT.
1919. Roberts VS.. Indianapolis Street.
Railway Company. Marion G.. c. Affirmed
Comstock Ut is negligence for person &c
ride a bicycle so near street car track In
the direction the cars travel thereon that he
may be struck by the car in its passing
without properly using his sight and hear
ing to avoid danger.
I243 Tevis VS.. Hammersmith. Clark c
c. Reversed. Roby c. i'll. The law per
mits no speculation by a corporate Office
at the expense of and to the detriment o.
his corporation. 2. Nonuser of its fran
chises by a corporation does not of itse
amount to forfeiture. 3. A demand upoI
the directors Of a corporation individual.
and separately Is not a demand upon tn
|. corporation. 4. demand Is unnecessar!
| where it is shown that would avail nothin,
| and at the same time be hazardous to tn
interests of the parties.
| 1885, Riley VS.. Haworth Clinton c.
| Petition for rehearing overruled.
| 1880 Gadburg VS.. Ohio. etc.. Company
Blackboard c. c. Same.
1896 Coulter VS.. Bradley. Clinton c.
| Advanced.
4631 Eikenberry VS.. Burns. Wells c.
| Publication ordered and issued.
1912. White VS.. c.. r. g. NJ r. R. &C
| Wayne C. c. Appellants granted sixt
| days additional time to file brief.
1896. Phillips VS.. Heidi. Vanderburg c
c. Leave granted to file brief in thirt
| days.
1856. Indiana, ETC., Co. vs. Bender. Mian
| 8. c. Appellants time extended until Apr
| rs, 1903.
| New Suit
AHA. Elizabeth Groves vs.. Zachariah
| Hobbs. Clinton c. c. Record. Assign
ment Of errors. Notice to Hamilton county
| Minutes
1856. Indiana and Ohio Live Stock Ir
surance Co. VS.. Conrad Bender ct a
| Marion c. c. Petition for additional tim
| granted to April Is, 1903.
| 45S5. c., 1. & l.. Ry. Co. VS.. Jerome
Leachman. Montgomery u. e. Appellee
4OI7. c., c., c. ST. L. Ry Co. v,
Jerome B. Coffman. Marion c. c. Appe
lees additional authorities.
4635. Jefferson School Township. Boon
county VS.. Henry Adams, ST. Boone c.
| Appellants dismissal.
4545. The American Mutual Life Insur
ance Co. VS.. Mary Bertram. Elkhart c. {
Appellees brief 90 on errors and eros
|