Vermont phÅ“nix. [volume] (Brattleboro, Vt.) 1834-1955, 1903-07-24
S,TATE OF VERMONT, windham County.
IDA VI. SHAW,

IDA VI. SHAW. In Chancery
september Term.
GEORGE :. PERRY. ct ais A. d. 1853.
Whereas. the petition OF Ida NJ. Shaw of
Hinsdale in the County of Cheshire and State
of New Hampshire. filed in this Court on the
auth day of July. ls9. returuable AT the Wind
ham County Court of Chancery next To be
held at Newfane within and for said County
of Windham. on the FIRST wednesday after the
first TUESDAY OF September, A. ID; ls'a show
tlcOoro in said Windham County. on the 18th
day of October 1891, duly executed TO Warren
;. Fessenden of said Brattleboro, a mortgage
deed of certain land in Guilford and Halifax.
in said Windham County, bounded as follows
Commencing at the northwest corner thereof,
Walter Phelps and Edward l.. Reed to the
highway leading past Mrs. Edward HOwe's
to land owned by Ninal Keith; thence westerly
on said keiths land to the highway leading
from Hinesburg to Marlboro; thence on said
highway to the place of beginning. containing
one hundred and twenty-five acres be the
same more or less. Eighteen and one-half
acres of the above d scribed land is situated in
Halifax and is school land, called. Con-
dtioned for the payment of a certain promi-
sorry note OF the said George ;. Perry with
even date OF said mortgage for the sum of If
teen hundred dollars, and payable 10 said War
rem FesSenden or order with interest annually,
/ which Is now justly due and owing and has
not been paid according TO the effect of the
! And further showeth that the said Warren
| Fessenden on the 10th day of October. 1885, in
| consideration of the sum of fifteen hundred
dollars, sold, transferred and assigned said
mortgage and note TO one j. VI. Shaw OF Hins-
! dale in said Cheshire County. the husband of
said petitioner; That on the Both day of Octo-
/ Ter. 1899. the said ]. VI. Shaw departed this
/ life That the said J. NJ. Shaw left last will
! and testament which was duly prohated and
allowed by the Probate Court for the County
! of Cheshire and that by the terms of said will
the said mort gage and note above described
were by the Probate Court for the county of
! Cheshire decreed TO said petitioner as the
residuary legatee under said will and that she
| is now the lawful owner of the same.
And further showeth that Emma f. Prenney
| of Cambridge in the County of Middesex,
Massachusetts, is the present owner OF said
described premises covered by said mortgage.
| and that J. c. Prenney, husband of the said
! Emma E. Prenney. William n. Langley of Med
ford in said Middlesex County. William II .
| Lake and Minnie Lake, husband and wife, o
| Everett in said Middlesex County and George
! X. q oodenough of Newfane in said Windham
County, claims some sort of an interest in said
premises the exact nature of which said petit
toner is unable 10 ascertain, but she AYERS that
the right. title and interest of the said J. c..
Prenney, William y. Langley, William II. Lake,
| Minnie Lake and George X. Goodenough in
| said premises are all subordinate TO the right,
title and interest of said petitioner therein
| under said mortgage.
And further showeth that the said George s.
Perry, Emma E. Prenney, j. C, Prenney, Will
| liam n. Langley, William III. Lake and Minnie
| Lake, all reside without the state of Vermont
| where the ordinary process of subpoena cannot
be served on them. and praying that an order
| of said notice and summons upon the said
| George ;. Perry, Emma L. Prenney, j. {.
| Prenney William n. Langley. William III. Lake
and Minnie Lake, by publication, be made in
the premises.
wherefore the petitioner prays that the
! equity of redemption of the said George 5.
| Perry. Emma f. Prenney, j. c. Prenney. Will
liam II. Lake. William y. Langley, Winnie
Lake and George X. Goodenough in the prem
ises may be foreclosed agreeably to the pro
visions of law.
Therefore il being made TO appear that the
said George ). Perry, Emma Z. Prenney, j. c.
Prenney William n. Langley. William II. Lake
and Minnie Lake reside without the State of
Vermont so that the ordinary process OF
subpoena cannot be served upon them, il ls
ordered that the petitioner give said George
:. Perry, Emma f. Prenney, j. c. Prenney,
William n. Langley, William H. Lake and
Minnie Lake, notice of the tendency of said
petition and the term of Court TO which il is
made returnable by publishing the substance
of her said petition as hereinbefore set forth,
together with this notice, in The Vermont
Phoenix, "A newspaper printed at BrattleborC
in said Windhan County. three weeks sue
cessively, the last publication 10 be at least
twenty days prior TO the first day of the Sep.
TENDER term, A. ID. 1903, of this Court, and
that the said George 5. Perry, Emma Z
Prenney, j. C. Prenney, William n Langley
William III. Lake and Minnie Lake be and here
by are required TO appear in said Court on the
first day of said term thereof, and make answer
TO said petition; otherwise the same will bt
taken as confessed which publication will b'
deemed sufficient notice for them TO appear
and make answer If they see nit.
Given under my hand at Brattleboro in saic
County this 10th day of July, A. ID. 1903.
HAsKINs & ScHwENK, Solicitors DS