Daily Kennebec journal. [microfilm reel] (Augusta, Me.) 1870-1975, 1903-04-30

| Other cases on the assigned civil list
lare as follows:
No. 400. Jacob Scanks of Oakland
Sheldon & SaWtelle of Augusta, for the
an action with the ad damnum placed
lat $500 to recover payment on account
Iannexed. Sheldon e. Sawtelle of Au-
Igusta, for the plaintiff and Williamson
& Burleigh of Augusta, for the de-
lfendant.
No. 412 Jacob Scanks of Oakland vs.
is. Ladd. both of Augusta. This is an
faction with the ad damnum placed at
$500 to recover for labor performed
Sheldon e Sawtelle of Augusta, for the
plaintiff and E. M. Thompson, Esq, for
the defendant.
No. 412. Jacob Scanks of Oakland VS..
Hannah Stedman of Sidney. This is an
action with the ad damnum placed at
5000 to recover for labor performed.
Sheldon & Sawtelle of Augusta. for
the plaintiff and Williamson & Bur
leigh of Augusta, for the defendant.
| No. 457. George l.. Macomber VS.
Albert S. Smith and Hettie A. Smith,
both of Monmouth. This is an action
with the ad damnum placed at $500 to
lecoNeI pay lllelll Oh u DfOnllSSOfy note.
HI. E. Foster. Esq, of Winthrop, for the
plaintiff and l.. r. Carleton, Esq, of
| Winthrop for the defendant
| No. 2S1. Will C. Atkins of Gardiner
VS.. A. E. Bail Company of Saco. This
| is an action with the addamnum placed
at $55 to recover on account annexed.
| Will c.. Atkins of Gardiner for the
plaintiff and Thomas Leigh, Esq, of
Augusta, and Haley & Haley of Bidde-
ford. for the defendant.
| No. 314. Sarah Hebert of Waterville
Tvs. George Boucher of Augusta. This
| is an action with the ad damnum
placed at 5000 to recover on a
lpromissory note. Letourneau & Mat
thew of Watervilie, for the plaintiff
and Benedict F. Maher Esq, of Au-
gusta, for the defendant
No. 629. A. NJ. Brown vs.. William II.
| Pierce. appellant from the Augusta
municipal court. This is an action to
recover on account annexed. w. II.
Fisher, Esq, of Augusta for the
plaintiff and Sheldon & Sawtele of Au-
gusta for the defendant.
No. 400. S. N. Maxcy Manufacturing
Company of Gardiner vs. Edward g.
Savage and Leland E. Savage, both of
| Augusta. This is an action with the ad
damnum placed at $50 to recover on ac-
count annexed. George w. Heselton,
Esq, of Gardiner, for the plaintiff and
| Sheldon & SaWtelle of Augusta, for the
defendant
| No. 219. George II. Wiltshire of Au-
gusta VS.. Charles w. Blaisdell of
| Gardiner. This is an action with the
| 1H 11n1n11Do rl1opp1 1T coon tn
payment for a horse which the de-
| PENDANT sold the plaintiff and which
the Plaintiff claims was not sound at
the time of sale. Sheldon e Sawtele
of Augusta. for the plaintiff and
George w. Heselton, Esq, of Gardiner
for the defendant.
No. $40. A. A. Soule of Augusta vs.
Mrs. f. J. Nelson of Readfield. This
is an action with the ad damnum
placed at $50 to recover on account an
nexed. Sheldon & Sawtelle of Augusta,
for the plaintiff and George W. Hesel-
ton, Esq, of Gardiner for the defen-
dant
No. 1852. Sarah w. Cotton of China
VS.. the Wiscasset, Watervile & Farm
ing Railway Company. This is an ac-
ton with the ad damnum placed at 5000
to recover damages for the negligence
of the defendant in not erecting
fence. Fremont ]. c. Little Esq, of
Augusta, for the plaintiff and l.. W.
Folsom. Esq, of Norrdgewock, for the
defendant.
| No. $40. John Milton vs.. the Oak
Grove Cemetery Association, both of
Gardiner This is an action with the
sd damnum placed at $500 to recover
on account annexed Will C. Atkins
Esq, of Gardiner. for the plaintiff and
Charles A. Knight. Esq. of Gardiner
and Cornish & Bassett of Augusta, for
the defendant.
| No. 256 Simon Clough VS.. w. w.
Woodbury.. both of Monmouth. This is
Ian action with the ad damnum placed
at $75 to recover on account annexed.
Thomas Leigh, Esq, of Augusta, for
the plaintiff and George c. Wing, Esq,
of Auburn for the defendant.
No. Ais. Ira B. Choate of Windsor
VS. the Wiscasset, Waterville & Farm
ington Railroad Company. This is an