The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1903-11-21
HIGHER COURTS RECORD.


20Osl State ex rel. Maxwell vs. Dudley. Sui
Ivan c. c. Affirmed Hadley Ill. A county
coroner appointed to act as sheriff by reason
of the sheriff having become ineligible for fail.
March 3 isoi ACTS 1901. Page si5; such soES.
sheriff: not as sheriff, but as coroner until a
where person other than the prosecuting at
torney Is relator: In cases where such person
1882 Board of Commissioners Moore.
Madison G. c. Affirmed. Monks, G. Ill
son st to be insane and dangerous to the com ON
munity If suffered to remain at large, and
sue 80 s and OF
performed the duties and rendered the services
of the act of 1898. known as the county reform
law he could maintain an action against the
liability of the county is for reasonable COM
pensation for the services rendered by the per-
son appointed and is not t., created by contract.
such insane person to the custody of some per-
son is necessary to accomplish the purposes of
Sections 69S7-6S95. Burns. 1901. being Acts 1855,
Page lSs But tb such Soar apPSntmsIs Is only tenn
at any time appoint some other person to per-
form such services A. Section 2I25. Burns.
court having probate jurisdiction, while Sec
lions 69s7-699S, Burns. 1901, applies to proceed
ings commences before justice OF the peace,
2OiS6 Potter vs. State of Indiana Marion
2OlS u S. Elk Co. VS. State Howard C. C.
withdraw transcript.
2OOS7. Seymour Water Co. VS., City of sey-
% 1908. jennings g Z orai argument Dec H.
Minutes
90196 William Potter VS.. State of Indiana
Marion Criminal Court. Appellant granted eight
2olsi Melvin l. Bowlin VS. James Cochran ct
al. Upton c. c. Appsllees additional author
New Suit
2O22O. State ex rel. Benjamin F. Theibaud VS..
Connarsville Natural Gas Company. Fayette c..
c. Record. Assignment of errors. Joinder.
APPELLATE COURT.
1853 Indiana. Manufacturing Company VS..
Buskirk. Miami Miami G. C Reversed Robinson.
gagged in the services of his employer in a fac
tory in order t sct a tS under the
ceived. it must be made to appear that he was
acting under some special order direction of
conform when injured. 1t is not enough to show
that he was performing his general duties. 2.
an injury received through the negligence OF a
$50 $50 Field VS.. Campbell Washington c. c.
Petition for rehearing overruled. Roby. IA
mortgage executed by married woman to in
demnify her husbands sureties is only voidable
1882 City Of Franklin VS. Davenport john
damages caused BY the negligence of the de-
PENDANT q general allegation Of negligence In
the complaint Is SuIIclent 10 Withstand a de-
murrer for want of facts. and under such allie
cation the facts constituting negligence may
be given in evidence. In such complaint it is
not necessary to use the term, 'proximate
cause to show that the negligent acts pleaded
were the cause of the injury.
$685. Parker VS.. State of Indiana Sullivan
c. G: Reversed: Comstock, p. J-where a
practieing physician sells whisky mixed with a
drug for medical use and for a particular pur-
pose, without a prescription, he is not liable
for the unlawful sale of liquor. although at the
time OF the sale the whisky may have been sepa-
rated from the drug and used a beverage.
4S6f indianapolis Street railway Company VS..
Tenner Marion s. c. Petition for rehearing
overruled.
506S Beasey High. White c. c. Ger
tiorari granted and issued
5O47. Hanrahan va. Knickerbocker. Lake
s. c: Motion for reversal postponed until final
hearing. Appellse's motion for leave to file
briefs overruled
4sS4 voris VS.. Plate Glass Company. Howard
S. c. Transferred to Supreme Court.
Minutes
4slL William II. Kendall vs. John A Harde-
beck Howard C, c. Appellee's brief Isl
1864 Ezra c. Voris VS.. John Buskirk. Mont
gomery G: G. Appellant granted ninety days ex-
tension Of time.