Ottumwa semi-weekly courier. [volume] (Ottumwa, Iowa) 1899-1903, 1902-12-30

COOperS aQQlClOn TO OttumWa De Gull
eted in her, and that she recover as
alimony $50 to cover the expense of
this suit. w. w. Epps, attorney for
plaintiff.
James Napier VS. Minnie Napier, pc
tition for divorce. Plaintiff states
that he and the defendant were mar
ried at Abba, and that four years ago
the defendant deserted him. He prays
for decree of divorce. w. w. Ran
kin, attorney for plaintiff.
John Pitcher VS. Matte Pitcher, petit
ton for divorce. Plaintiff states that
he and the defendant were married in
Wapello county January 81, 1900, and
states that the defendant has been |
guilty of gross and inhuman treatment |
of him and asks for a decree of di- |
vorce. w. w. Rankin, attorney for
plaintiff.
Maggie Bales VS. H. l.. Bales, petit |
ton for divorce. Plaintiff states that
she and the defendant were married
January "a, 1888, and charges the de-
PENDANT with cruel and inhuman treat !
ment. She prays for a decree of di-
vorce and for the custody of five min
Or children. Work & Work, attorneys
for plaintiff.
Anna B. Ray VS. Frank A. Ray, petit
ton for divorce. Plaintiff states that
she and the defendant were married
July 8, 1891, at Ottumwa and that in
April 1901, the defendant deserted her
She prays for a decree of divorce w.
w. Epps, attorney for plaintiff.
Law Gases.
H. A. Baker VS.. c. B. & @. Ry., suit
for damages. Plaintiff prays for judg.
ment against the defendant in the sum
of $3.50 on account of injuries alleged
to have been received while a passen
ger on west bound freight train at
Chillicothe June 16, 1902. C. w.
Whitmore, attorney for plaintiff.
James Cottrell VS.. Wapello county
petition for damages. Plaintiff asks
for Judgment against the defendant in
the sum of $1,000 On account of iniu.
ries and loss of property alleged to
have been sustained by the plaintiff
August IL, 1902, by reason of falling
through en- alleged defective bridge in
township ", section 10, range Is, Wap
clio county, over which plaintiff was
driving with loaded wagon at the
time of the accident. Plaintiff alleges
that the condition of the bridge was
unsafe owing to the negligence of the
county officials. w. w. Cory, attor-
ney for plaintiff
4 Catharine Graham VS.. Cheadle &
Ford, suit for damages. Plaintiff asks
4 judgment against the defendant for
i S615.S5 with interest and cost on ac-
count of alleged misuse and damage to
4 her building at 312 East Main street
during the four years said building
was leased and used by the defendants
as saloon. Steck & Smith, attorneys
for plaintiff
i Farmers national bank of Hamburg
VS.. Tisdale Brcs.. suit for damages.
Plaintiff prays for Judgment against
!, the defendant in the sum OF S10S.75 and
costs, alleging that it's property was
, attached wrongfully by the defendants
, C. B. Butterield, attorney for the plain
tiff.
L. NJ Carpenter VS.. NJ T. English
and John T. Rupe, attachment Plain
, tiff states that on February 20, 1902
the defendants conveyed to him g
pron,issory note for s26405 with in
d tarest, that this note is unpaid Will
! the. excertion Of $50 md asks iudg
, ment against defendants in the sum O
( S255.S5. He also asks thai writ O.
attachment be issued against the pror
/ erty of the defendants. Mitchell
, Hunter. attorneys for the plaintiff.
H. S. Meiskay VS.. the Ostdie!s Ciga7
!, Co.. attachment. Plaintiff states tina
j on September II, 1901, the defen;~n
! conveyed to him a promissory note
for $500, upon which there is still du,
y balance Of $17.71. He also state
i that on September IL, 1901, he receiv
ed another similar note for 500, whicl
;. remains unpaid. He asks for iude
q ment for .s125.25 against the defend
4 ant and for writ of Gttachmen
n against the property CT said defendant
J. Gilmore & Moon, attorneys for plain
# TIM
Q Wyman-Rand Carpet Co. VS.. VIM
v Klee, attachment. Plairt'ff asks tina
i a writ of attachment be issued agains
3 the property of the defendant to sal
isly claims for $3.50 G. w Viii
more attorney for plaintiff.
!, S. R. Cheadie VS.. Simon Finder. a
II tachment Plaintiff asks for writ c
= attachment against the property of tn
Il defendant to satisfy claims for S132.5i
y Jacques & Jaques, attorneys for plail
. tiff.
Maud B. Powers VS.. the Fideht
Loan and Building Association, suit o
l contract. Plaintiff asks judgment. &c
/ S4,140, interest and costs, claiming
Ie have loaned to the defendant thi
II amount. Steck & Smith, attorneys fc
. the plaintiff.
d National Cash Register Co. VS.. T
5, A. Gangs ct al, replevin petition
'I Plaintiff states that on May u, 100
ST it made a conditional sale to Owens
e O'Neill of cash register, taking note
e. for the payment. Plaintiff turtle
states that the cash register was COZ
IL veyed by Owen & O'Neill to H. !
e. Gangs to satisfy claim held by hi
4. against the partnership. Plaintiff ash
Dr. that writ of replevin be issued fc
or the property or if it can not be foun
n for the value of the same. Heindel
in Weber, attorneys for plaintiff.
IT. C. e. Millard ct al vs. Carey A. w
id ken, suit on note. Plaintiffs state th;
VS. on May 81, 1900 they signed no
with Carey A. Wilken as sureties, IL
IT, note being for $3.50; that the defen
at ant did not pay the note and TIL
ed plaintiffs We're obliged to pay note f,
II honor at an expense of $26630. The
40 damapd iudpment for tho aOouut of II