The age-herald., 1902-04-26
E. CARLISLE JONES,
Attorney at Law. 216 ChaIifoux Building.

Mccormack and Ramsay, and was owned and controlled by them for the purpose of providing machinery so that they could appropriate for their benefit the lands of the Ensley Land Company.
 Complainants charge that the state ments of said Shook to the stockholders of the Ensley Land Company were false and fraudulent; that defendant, McCor- mack. acquired the interest of Mary T. Warner in the judgment, was at that time an officer in the Ensley Land Com pany and could not acquire an adverse interest as against said company.
 Compliments charge that the whole proceedings at said stockholders meeting of the Ensley Land Company and of all the many transfers and deeds conveying the title to the lands subsequent to the sheriff's sale, were for the private purpose of said defendants. Baxter Bowron, Ram sey, Mccormack and Shook, of getting said lands for their own personal benefit.
 The organization of the Ensley Com pany Is said to be fraudulent and the con- veyance from this company to defendants, Barker and Bowron. on December 28, 1897, should have been made to the Ensley Land Company. and that the recital therein that said Barker and Bowron pur- chased said lands is false Compliments charge that this conveyance was upon
 
 defendants, Mccormack, Shook, Baxter, Bowron and Ramsey could arrange to get away from the Ensley Land Com pany it's statutory right of redemption and legal rights in the premises, said lands or a large part of them, and such part the choicest and most valuable, should be reconveyed to said Ens1ey Com pany, which fraudulent understanding was actually consummated Barker was lar ip bv tha other dafan- dants of the real purpose of the transac- tion
 That on February 24, 1898, Barker and Bowron, so-called trustees, conveyed 220 acres of the choicest and most valuable land to the Ensley Company. and on the same day conveyed to Mccormack and Ramsey 10 acres in the heart of the town for $4O0 an acre, and that on July 2s, ls9S' an additional 10 acres was conveyed them.
 The consolidation in the deed to the Ensley Company is s1400o. but the lands are alleged to have been worth $200000 and could have been sold for s100,000 easi- ly.
 That the ten acres first sold Ramsey and Mccormack were sold for s4000, but were worth $10o, 900 and the second ten acres was sold for 5000 but was worth $150o0 to $30, 900.
 comnlainants state that the alleged fraudulent dClS COHlpidhhSQ oL "Sit known to them until within the last three months.
 coMPL CLAIMANTS
 ASK FOR RELIEF.
 They pray that all of the conveyances including the sheriff's deed be declared void and set aside.
 That if the sheriff's deed be held not void. but voidable, that the title obtained at said sale be held to rest in trust for said Ensley Land Company in the said Ensley Company. Mccormack and Ram sey and that they be required to release and convey the same to the Ensley Land Company.
 That the conveyance from the defend ants Barker and Bowron as trustees to the Ensley Company and to Mccormack and Ramsey be held fraudulent and void and that the Ensley Land Company be decreed to be the owner of all lands de- scribed in said conveyances.
 An injunction is asked prohibiting the