Ottumwa semi-weekly courier. [volume] (Ottumwa, Iowa) 1899-1903, 1902-10-23

certain described real estate IN sec
ton %, township Il, range 10, in Wa
pello county She asks that the prop
erty be equitably apportioned and
that she be given such other relief as
deemed Just. Payne & Sewers, of
Bloomfield, attorneys for plaintiff.
George Bennett VS.. Warren Hamil-
ton, ct al. Petition in equity to can
eel real estate contract and secure re-
turn of purchase money. Plaintiff
says in his petition that in January,
1902, he bought, through defendants
agents lot 10, block 10, Hamilton
Chambers & Co. addition to Ottumwa,
believing same to be clear of incum-
brances, but that since that time he
has learned that the property had
been bought at tax sale. He asks
that the deed be annulled and his pur-
chase money be returned. G. w.
Whitmore, attorney for plaintiff.
Samuel Mccullough VS.. Thomas Pol
lock, ct al, petition to quiet title. Plain
tiff asks that title be quoted in him
to the following Wapello county real
estate, west half of northwest quarter
of section %, township rs. range ID
McElroy & McElroy, attorneys for the
plaintiff.
l.. P. Jennings, ct al, VS.. John w.
Jennings, ct al, petition for partition.
Plaintiffs. through their, attorneys,
Steck &. Smith, asks that the shares
of the parties in the case of the estate
Of the late H. G. Jennings be deter
mined and that the Widows share be
set aside the balance of the estate to
be sold and divided among the heirs.
First Methodist Episcopal church of
Otumwa VS.. w. Hill, petition for in
junction. Plaintiff prays for the abate-
ment of an alleged nuisance claiming
same to be feed stable in the rear
of the church building between Fourth
and Second streets. w. A. Work and
Geo. T. Heindel, attorneys for plaintiff.
Eugene H. Macoy VS.. Lewis & Adj
Ter, ct al, petition in equity. Plaintiff
asks for an injunction to restrain the
defendants from disposing of the fol
lowing property of which he claims to
be owner, and asks also that the title
be quieted for him: Lot 81, block 10,
of the original plat of the city of OF
tumwa. W. w. Cory and Jaques &
jacques. attorneys for the plaintiff.
Sarah o. McCune VS.. A. Bongers ct
AL petition in equity. Plaintiff asks
for g temporary injunction restraining
them from disposing of corn on her
land, until rent is paid. Steck &
Smith attorneys for plaintiff.
Frank P. Holman, through his at,
torneys, Gilmore & Moon, asks per
nit to sell liquor for medicinal pur-
poses in accordance with the law.
f. T. Barton VS. Peter Maloney, adj
ministrator of the estate of Patrick
Colgan, deceased, and John Colgan
Petition to foreclose mortgage. Plain
tiff for cause of action states that or
or about November Is, 1901, Patrick
Colgan executed to plaintiff his prom
issory note for s76936. To secure
said note said Patrick Colgan exc
cuted mortgage upon the south hall
of the northwest quarter of section
twenty-eight, township seventy-two
range thirteen in Wapello county;
that said note, principal and interest
is now due and payable. Plaintiff de
mands judgment for amount OF note
principal and interest and cost of suit.
Sumner Siberell. attorney for plaintiff
State of Iowa VS. A. M. McCully, in
which defendant is charged with lar
ceny.
Jennie McSparen VS. George w. Nc.
Sparen, petition for divorce. Plaintiff
states that she was married at Eldor
in March, 1889, and that three children
have been born to this union, Philip
Arthur, aged 13 years; Eugene Clar-
ence, aged II years. and Opal Lillian
aged years. She charges the defend
ant with cruel and inhuman treatment
and asks for divorce and the Gus
tody of the children, and for temporary
and permanent alimony. Fullen &
Ayres, attorneys for plaintiff.
Rosa M. Hyde VS. Walter j. Hyde
petition for divorce Plaintiff states
that she was married to the defend
ant at Competine, March 3, 1901, and
alleges non-support and cruel and in
human treatment as grounds for ac-
ton. She asks for divorce and So,
900 alimony G. B. Baker, attorney fol
plaintiff.
Eliza M. Harrison vsSShadrack Har-
rison, petition for divorce. Plaintiff
states that she and defendant Were
married at Ottumwa. February 1893
and alleges cruel and inhuman treat
ment and desertion. w. w. Eppss at
torney for plaintiff.
Ethel Downey VS. Joseph Downey
petition for divorce. Plaintiff states
that she was married to defendan
September 10, 1897, and charges de-
sertion as grounds for action. B. w
Scott, attorney for plaintiff.
Mary M.Judson VS. Daniel Judson. pc
tition for divorce. Plaintiff states tina
she was married to the defendant il
Ottumwa October 6, 1901, and allege
cruel and inhuman treatment al
grounds for action. d. H. Emery, at
torney for plaintiff.
Naomi Cline vs.. James Cline. peti
ton for divorce. Plaintiff states thai
she was married to defendant OF
September 10, 1894. and that since
that time defendant has been guilty O
cruel and inhuman treatment Shit
asks for divorce and alimony IN the
sum of $500. Jaques & Jaques, attor
neys for plaintiff.
Bell Campbell & VS.. Samuel Camp
bell, petition for divorce. Plaintiff
states that she was married to de
PENDANT in Jefferson county in October
| 1883, and alleges desertion as ground
for action. B. w. Scott, attorney TO
plaintiff.
Ella Devenna VS.. Neal Devenna, pc