New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1902-01-15
I'm DISIRIC COURT

- -AOA-Nl -AsssXJSAJAOAs
GRAND JURY FINDS INDICTMENT AGAINST
SEVERAL Law BREAKERS.
mo INDICTMENT AGAINST HARTMANN.
FRANCES dRoEBNER is CHARGED WITH
MANsLAudhTERIN and DEGREE.
The grand jury put IN nearly a solid
week Of work and found indictments
Iaginst the following parties: Frances
Groebner for manslaughter in the second
degree. The story of Miss Groebner's
crime is still fresh in the minds of the
people. Evidence was brought that
seemed to prove that she killed her
|illegitimate child and threw it in the
river. The crime was committed last
summer. Ferdinand Trebesch was in
+ E Il ~ 2t s K II -: .E fEs1t
dicted for assault in the second degree.
Ed. Jahnke and Carl Groebner, the
boys accused by Coleman the detective
OF putting ties on the M. g. st. L. rail
roai we're allowed to go the evidence not
being strong enough to hold them.
The following cases will be tried dur
ing vacation. # n
Cornish & Company, plaintiffs, vs..
The searles Go. Operative Creamery Co.,
ct al, defendants.
John w. Schmitt, as trustee in bank
ruptcy Of Peter II. Bahl, plaintiff, vs..
Peter 81. Dahl, Amelia Dahl and Mrs.
Peter H. Dahl, defenda ats.
G. H. Hornburg, plaintiff, VS.. Fred
Hager ct al, defendants. <S
Albert Q. Amundson, paintiff, VS.. Hans
L. Bjorneberg, defendants.
Chas. Gamble, plaintiff, VS.. Michael
Bagen ct al, defendants.
John W. Schmitt, as trustee in bank,
ruptcy of Fred Hager, plaintiff, VS.. Fred
Hager and Mary Hager and Gerhard
Neemann and Mary Neeman, defendants.
Robert Kumm ct al, plaintiffs, vs.. G..
D. Griffith and WV. Smith, defendants
The following case were continued.
Thresa Toomey, plaintiff, vs.. Michael
]. Toomey, defendant.
NJ. ]. Toomey, plaintiff, VS.. CARL Hop
fensperger and Mrs. Carl Hopfensperger,
defendants. -
Geo. N. Hanson, plaintiff, VS.. William
Gieseke, defendant.
Augusta Serr, plaintiff, VS.. @. D.
Griffith and w. W. Smith, defendants.
The following were dismissed.
J. o. Andrews, plaintiff, vs.. Otto
Baarsch and Thomas Cannon, ccpartners,
defendants. Dismissed without cost to
either party.
The G. A. Nichols Co., plaintiff, vs..
Peter Roy, defendant. Dismissed By
plaintiff. g.~.
A. L. Ackerly, plaintiff, VS.. John
Hazen, defendant. Hoidale &. Somsen
for plaintiff, Albert Pfaender for defend
ant. Judgment for plaintiff.
Emma Neemann, plaintiff, VS.. sFcrdi-
nand Crore ct al, defendants. Holdale
&. Somsen for plaintiff, Albert Pfaender
for defendant. Demurrer for argument.
Andreas Betz, plaintiff vs.. G. & N. W.
Railway, defendants. Albert Pfaender
for plaintiff, Brown, Abbott s. Somsen
for defendant. Judgment for plaintiff.
Wilhelmine Book, plaintiff, vs.. Geo.
and Gustav Boeck, defendant. Albert
Pfaender for plaintiff, 9. A. Hagberg
and Jos. A.. Eckstein for defendant.
Judgment for defendant.
G.. I. Wood, plaintiff, vs.. August 1.
Il t e
Matter, defendant. Albert Pfaender fol
plaintiff, Hoidale s. Somsen for defend.
ant. Judgement for plaintiff.
William Pfaender, plaintiff, vs.. G. 8
N. W. R'ys CO., defendant. Albert Pfaen.
der for plaintiff, Boown, Abbot 8 Som.
sen for defendant. Decision pending.
Geo. N Hanson, plaintiff, rs. William
i Gieseke, defendant, Z. g. Davis fol
4 plaintiff, somervllle s Olsen for defend
ont. Continued.
William Pfaender, plaintiff, vs.. w. &
i Sc. !. R'y Go. also known as 9. q NV
u R'y, corporation, defendant, Albert
j Pfaender for plaintiff, Brown, Abbott 8
lsomsen for defendant. Motion pending
Anna Faas, Plaintiff, vs.. Fritz Bormar
defendant, Hoidale 8 somsen for plain
! .tiff Jos. AZ. Eckstein for defendant
a Iuf1p mant for nialntife. $500. s: