Wausau pilot. [volume] (Wausau, Wis.) 1896-1940, 1902-02-18

ant was arrested May %, 1901. On the
24th day of May the defendant Was
bound over to the circuit court for Mar
athon county. bail being fixed at the
sum of $500. In default of giving bail
he was committed to jail May "A the
defendant requested TO be arraigned be-
fore the circuit court and that he be al
lowed TO plead guilty. Such proceed
ing We're had that on the 3lst day OF
May the defendant was arraigned and
plead guilty and was sentenced TO one
year and six months in states prison.
The state of Wisconsin vs.. John Mil
ler.-This defendant was charged with
larceny from a dwelling house: arrested
May IS. Examination was adjourned
until May 3lst when the case was dis
missed on motion of the district attor-
Eey. for the reason that no evidence
could be obtained To convict.
The State of Wisconsin VS.. Herbert
Topham. was IA prosecution for
adultery. The defendant was arrested
June IL and preliminary examinati ton
had ON the Goth day of June. The de-
PENDANT was bound over TO the circuit
court for trial, furnishing a bond of
$500 for his appearance. At the Sep
TENDER 1901 term the defendant pro-
cured an adjournment until the Febru-
airy 1902 term. This action is still
pending.
| The state OF Wisconsin vs.sWm. Wal
ing.-Complaint was made against the
| defendant for an attempt to commit
rape. Complaint made and warrant is
sued on the 18th day of June and papers
handed the sheriff. The defendant not
| being found the matter Is still pending.
The State of Wisconsin VS.. Aug.
| Walkowski.- This was criminal prose-
| cution for pointing a gun at the COM
planning witness. There was jury
trial had, the defendant was found
guiltyAand fined $40 and cost or stand
committed to the county Jail for Is days.
/ An appeal was taken 10 the circuit
court which action is now pending.
| The defendant gave bond in the sum of
$500 for his appearance.
The State of Wisconsin VS.. b. E.
| Farnes.- Charged with being an in
mate of house of i'll fame. Defendant
plead guilty and fined $50 and costs
which was paid TO Justice Jones and
| defendant discharged.
The State of Wisconsin VS.. Bert
Bible aud Phil Passault.-Action for
assault and battery. The defendant
Biboe plead guilty and was fined $40
and costs which were paid to Justice
| Jones. The defendant Passault plead
not guilty and was tried by a jury and
discharged.
The State of Wisconsin VS.. VIM.
Booth.-This was prosecution for rape.
Such proceedings were had that on
July 20, 1901, an examination was held
and the defendenant discharged by the
justice, holding that there was not suf-
hcient evidence to show that an offense
had been committed.
The state of Wisconsin VS.. Chas.
Stenson.-This was criminal prosecu-
ton for embeZZlement. The defendant
was school district treasurer of the
town of FranZen and was charged with
having embezzled the sum of S556.
preliminary examination was waived
and the defendant bound over to the
circuit court for trial, furnishing bail
of $500 for his appearance. The case is
still pending and will be disposed of at
the February term.
The State of Wisconsin VS.. Joal II.
Goodale-This was a prosecution for
selling liquor without a license. AT
the trial of this action the case was
dismissed by the prosecuting officer
for the reason that the witnesses on
as to the facts. 1t was very evident
from the testimony that they wanted 10
shield the defendant.
The State of Wisconsin vs.. Emil
Braun and Georgia Parsons. This was
prosecution for the taking and deten-
tion OF a minor under the statute. Com
plant was made by Lydia Loomis, the
grandmother of young girl about IL
u.,nrS of ThaSa dafap6apts Uppa
arrested in the state of Minnesota.
Such proceedings were had before the
municipal court that the defendants
we're bouGd over TO the circuit court
for trial. The defendant Braun gave
bail for his appearance and the other
defendant was committed to Jail. An
information was filed against the de-
PENDANTS Sept. 20, 1901, and on the 18th
day of September the defendants re-
quested the court to allow them TO en-
ter plea of guilty. The defendant
Braun was thereupon fined $50 and sem
fenced to one year and six months in
states prison; the defendant Georgia
Parsons was fined $40 and sentenced TO
one year in states prison at Waupun.
The State of Wisconsin vs.. Fred Roe
der.-This was IA criminal prosecution
for selling aduterated milk. The de-
PENDANT was brought into court and
pleaded not guilty. An adjournment
was taken and after consultation with
his attorney and the prosecuting Off
Ger be decided TO plead guilty and was
fined so and costs which were paid To
Justice Jones.
The State of Wisconsin vs. Fred Win
klemsn.-This defendant was arrested
upon the charge Of having npon his per-
son hurglarious tools. An examination
was h;sG and defendant was bound over
to the circuit court for trial. He was
committed TO Jail. being unable to give
bond for his appearance in circuit court
Being unable To find sufficient evidence
to warrant proceeding u trial with this
action, the same was dismissed.
The state of Wiscol sin VS.. Maggie
Hebert. Complaint in this case was
made by the Asst. Dairy and Food Com
missioner of the state OF Wisconsin, Mr.
Sweeting, for the selling of impure
milk. The defendant was arrested and
brought into court and plead not guilty,
but on consultation with her attorney
and prosecuting officer the defendant
plead guilty and paid a fine of S25 and
costs, which was paid to Hon. Henry
Miller.
The State of Wisconsin VS.. Laigh
Smith.-This defendant was arrested
upon the complaint of Henry Oswald.
being charged with burglary, having
broken into Osswald's store in the night
time. The defendant was found guilty
and sentenced to the Industrial School
at Waukesha.
State of Wisconsin VS.. John Ida
This defendant was arrested upon the
complaint of Jos. Wilkowski, charging
him with larceny. On the 4th day of
October, 1901. an examination was had
and the defendant bound over to the
circuit court for trial. His bail was
fixed at at $500, which was furnished.
The State of Wisconsin VS.. Albert
Young. -This defendant was arrested
upon the charge OF hastardy. After he
was brought before the court an ad-
journmeut Vas taken and In the mean
time settlement was effected by the
partipS. the defendant having 10 the