Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1902-11-26
They Want Coal Controversy to Go
Before Commission.
NO SIGN OF SETTLEMENT
Independent Operators Meet and File
protest--Owe Il 10 Themselves TO
Have Full Investigation.


anthracite coal strike commission came
TO a sudden termination late this after
noon through the receipt OF q dispatch
to Wayne MacVeagh, representing the
Pennsylvania Coal company, and the
Hillside Coal & Iron company, notify
ing him that at a meeting OF the an
thracite coal road men in New York
today II had been decided not to grant
an interview to Mr. Mitchell and his
associates, which had been suggested
for Friday next. The announcement,
coming as It did after an all-day con-
ference in this city between Mr.. Mac
Veagh and Mr.. Mitchell and his asso-
ciates, attended part Of the time by
Carroll D. Wright, In an endeavor to
adjust some details Of the proposed
agreement, between the operators and
the miners, completely surprised every
4 on here.
From a reliable source 1t Is learned
that the proposition thaN the operators
meet Mr.. Mitchell on Friday next was
made at the instance Of Mr.. MacVeagh,
who was no less surprised than Mr..
Mitchell himself at the turn affairs
took today From statements made by
Mr. Darrow early In the day, the i'm
preston had spread that complete
agreement would be effected at today
conference, but when the meeting broke
up Mr.. Darrow read to the newspaper
4 men in the corridor outside his room
In Wizards hotel statement which
4 made II clear that no conference was
& likely. The statement was as follows:
THE conference today was simply a
x continuation OF the conferences held
= at Scranton and with precisely the
game object--that of trying to reach
basis Of hopeful discussion for an
" amicable settlement, Mr., MacVeagh
a has not been in Scranton since Thurs.
n day and some matters have since de-
a veoped as to which further confer.
X enCe might be useful before either the
& operators or the representative of the
miners approach the serious task of
formulating different agreement for
N their signatures"
M Mr.. Mitchell, when shown the dis
patch from New York telling of the
action Of the operators. simply smiled
and said that he had not asked for the
conference, but that when IL was sug-
gested to him II It would be agreeable
70 meet the operators he said 1t would.
Mr. barrow and Mr.. Lloyd, however,
& were outspoken regarding the action
81 of the operators. Mr. barrow said II
4 was now up to the operators" and
\ that he would return at once to Scran-
& ,oa, hasorD ~, ' Ss ~ WIN "p-
4 IN Win H. a sD,,''''ssioh feaoy W ~
n Mr. Ilo,d ho,a,sr T., ,,, 49,, a..
~ AssociateS prass disna =" s nau 'ae
y, ,he fa"t ba, ErtSn,,ia 80, $1,000 W
4 hssn s,,ggastod ~ "a, I0.,se ai nau
81 .oma ,oe,,ors -, h,os auSa IN,
soms diso sraor,art w." ."ta S Ia
n lovd ",ha saw ~ 49,, ,1,. IN.
iwser ,,,,aa ,ha nc,, Jn WV my zoo.
~ tha aanara' nra,'in,S ,u . ASSN
tlvo a,sen, Pso. s ,' VI s"e .enta-
IN, whioh ~ ~ upo" s,,e SUNS VI
x voni T., 'o o -. au1oui lieu loI
ga, ,a n 49, ~ s.,e ene pa,ues ti'lie
IN 1he;r sor,,,n, III 81 so'''p o', az
AZ ara o,i"eas a. ~ anu eaii ~ an o'i
Hnssion ora oon,inno ~ 49, w"
' Wo"n ai, ni,, .Ut,nue .ne nearing,
left here tonight for Scranton "1 '''
III INDEPENDENT OPERATORS IN
SESSION.
New yorl, Nav or ,,
dependent onthracI,o onap ~, ~,
kere In session hara ,oao,, ~ D.
1fn, Roer ne H. tarsa,' CIV =
&eading uas Il, no,conay 1vh'i a..
n 7 T,or Vie y" do,iieielice MitI tnem
1n,b,ooitn VIZ 20 an o'nclai vi tn'
&eaLInm o., upeis.vIs association
~ inden ios uae ueiesauon, saiu tha'
IA bettar ,a,,,'s go, go ~. helr " asN
oeller terms from the coal roads
n coal road u,u van. 70 Know why
IN, u piesiuents haa NOT siVei
arh,tra ae " present their sue &c
T~Tha tde .oi',i,'ission;
3dad oha uepenuen's, mr. rlemine
WITH ,he o o snouiuer 70 shoui,
biz treatrnort -, 'oau opela'ois ahu
iHomprehensih,o V W. u" un's ,ii'e II
', haenne we desire to ap.
bu, o. tne COMMISSION ana VII
I'M as,os oNs /, necessary
ting ~ !, ~ olnlpsol' repre-
NJ On, n sto, uepenaent eiators
Asrs Raer rhe auuressed t'
Ind Fowler "va 10 iIuesuaie, vi
IN v,goro,,si, anu waiter, IN whicf
p1oposed plan 10 spp, ,U.es, against th'
non before tho oo,t e .ne questions
cohmisslon for ~ s. ao'le coal strlK'
1-We believe Tho, ionowihg reasons
atthis time and ,non 49, d sel,ienieh
gc1ted would fornvan 'ne OASIS sug
power and perpeu,ato :, Vs,aonsh th'
petrated BY the UnIted M,s Susy,ce per
-That such settiena m,"e WORKER
iEtthe eyes Of the n,hl;c moulu pe
thai we have here,ofors - % eonl ,,
az the offenses cbarrad o sen guilty. o
A~Tbat NE " S
20 have such a perfec, IA oe''eye INA
d4tnse TO the allegations na eo,i,piu'
cQplainants before The '',aue uy tn
III b any money award m. oori',llissioi
Wild render would he far ,a .o', ,ha ~
ut)bunt we understood ~ ,sSs man IN
p1&ed TO concede esneo, ,n. Is pro
a. their laborers W MINER
&-That aside from o,,
n rations This comn,ia s money con
a6Se believe. Of mon ,ha, cVmpose'
lyfair. unhiasad ons "as are absolute
pofience and good ara o. unusual ex