Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1902-02-17
ROY KAIGHN CASE GOES OVER.
Youthful Slayer Of Willard Haynes Secures an Important Con-
tinuance-Will Not be Tried Until Nonensen
Case Is Out Of the Way.

nation and belief afllant further al
leges that " said Shaughnessy we're
present he would testify that immedi-
ately after said alleged shooting and
while said Willard s. Haynes was sit
ting IN q rocking chair In the
Knutsford hotel said Haynes
stated In substance and ef-
feet that he could not stand It
much longer and was done for and that
tho boy (meaning afllanO was not to
blame and that he (HayneD got just
what he deserved Afliant states that
since the said case was set for trial
he has used every means within MS
power TO procure the attendance OF
said shaughnessy, but without ayall.
That IA subpoena was Issued out Of said
court on the 7th day OF February for
said Shaughnessy ana every effort mas
been used as alllant has been Informed
and believes TO serve said subpoena ON
said Shaughnossy but as stated said
Shaughnessy IL not within the state
OF Utah That said Shaughnessy as af-
fnnt N Informed and believes, has been
travelling In the east at various places
and II was Impossible for aGlnnl To pro-
cure his address or ascertain his where
abouts That aflaut is Informed mat
said Shnughnossy has been detained In
the east ON pccount of the sudden III
ness of his wife aud VIII not return
10 the state of uuh for some time.
tfpon Information and belief alliant ale
leges that said Nhaughneasy expected
TO be back to Utah and 10 his home
within the next SIX weeks and atlianl
therefore alleges that II said cause
Is postponed until the nest term OF SAD
court he can procure the attendance uI
said Shaugnessy a gaia trial. That ne
Ne Is Informed by MS counsel ana
therefore alleges he cannot Salely pro.
iced % trial without the attendance VI
Wid shaughnesty ..,ou
subscribed and sworn to before me
this nth Day Of FeeIuafy lSO3, ,o...
JOHN dAmES, '.Vun' Dlu,H
By q, a. AhMNll'u N" pup"V'
ARgtEs FOR CONTINUANCE
Judge Nlhg theh upVeu iu' W
tlliuanoe OF tle ease uppn t.e h'uu'u3a
yet iofth IN lne auluaNll uiiu sl9,,u
that nc thuuBhl thht lhe uelenuan'
WIS emitted 10 Il continuance upon wv
showing made ne aibueu llut wy
testimony OF Vol SnauBnuea9E N
very material anu without bVlus VIZ
lurther INTO the delehhe nf 'Vu,'huvu
mat " was OF Vithi liulollGn't =" Nv
defendants case tie lhVukhl tlat w
district attorney Wouid hqlnll lnit w
evidence was material hnu we why W.
JectlOn lhe State Noulu iul'V w w
continuance Wouiu propuply ~ wy mNy
CT ulllseilce on lne part oi wy uelVhF
~ not either nallhs the WllheSS pVs-
ont or huVlns ms depoAltlun pul Nv
contelued that tney nau usV9 uNely
means TO reach me WilnesS hnu suuuIV
ms presence or uepoSlllun put u'at u
was Impossible 70 90 So ana tuey WeIo
~" ..,. ..,,.., ao,,,,,r,
District Attorney hlonnor coh'esisu
me motion FOR continuance anu salu'
"The state ~ opposed 70 oonllnuauve
on two gronhdA hrst' tnat the uelense
mas not used que ullgehoe III we llat-
leri that their Huppoenu WIS lssuVu pn
fep, Tor MT SnauelihessE W,ile w
case was set Jan rs Ihat M shaush,
messy colld certainly nave peen loValuu
Tor the purpose OF TAXING nus oelosiuo'l
PROVIDED ne Would not return 10 yum
~ time Tor me lrlal, lhe seCo4u
hfouhl u, uldt we lhat'vls Nn'beu w
me nnldaYlt 10 when MI anausnnessy
would leetlly u ne W'lN prsselll aie ~
competent ahd lminateflah lhat we
statement alleseu 70 nuVe oeen llaue ny
haynes 10 ohlushhessy Noulu pe neaI,
say testimony anu NOT III ING nutuie ul
2 dying dccloiRtohi mat the aihuaNl!
Tor continuance Goes het state lI'ot
NlNlEIulll ~