The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1902-06-09
THE FINAL
SESSION
TheSupremeCou
Will Convene
Today.
SPENDTHRIFT CASE
IS COMING UP
Decision Given on Appeal From
Auditor, and Court Defines
Meaning OF Law.

iii
morning at 10 o'clock. The eaIenda,
for this session is not as long as usual
neither are there as many important
appeals to be considered.
Among the appeals to be presented
at this session will be that of Harrison
vs.. Magoon. Familiarity known as the
"Hagey Gold Cure" case. and the
guardianship matter OF Annie T X.
Parker. In which the question OF trust
fund investment Is involved. This Is
the case In which Judge Humphreys
held that trust funds could not be in
vested In the bonds OF McBryde. Oahu
Railway and other corporations.
A motion for a rehearing in the case
OF Kaiua Kapukini. a spendthrift. will
also be presented. Below Is given a
list OF appeals on the calendar for the
present session OF the Supreme Court:
s. l.hmi vs.. w. II. Cornwen Jr, ex-
i ceptions from Circuit Court Second
Circuit. Kinney. Ballou & McClanahan
and Hons for plaintiff: Coke for de-
i neutrality-suspicious..
| T. NJ. Harrison VS.. j. A. Maeoon ct
al. exceptions from Circuit Court. First
1 Circuit Robertson & Wilder for plain
| tin: Kinney. Ballou and McClanahan
Il Tor ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Levers * Cooke VS. J. w. Redhouse.
| appeal from District Court OF Homo
4 lulu Peterson a. Matthewman for
plaintiff; De Bolt for Acknowledgement
liant.
A, A Montana vs.. w. r. Castle, ap-
peal from Judge. First Circuit. An
drews. Peters and Andrade for plain
tin: Weaver for acknowledgements
NJ Phillips A Co. vs.. Lee Chong ct
al. appeal from District Court OF Ho-
nolulu. Peterson & Matthewman for
plaintiff: Robertson & Wilder and
Russell X Watson for defendants-ap-
| peliant.
NJ. Phillips & Co. ct al VS.. Lee Chong
ct al. appeal from District Court Of
Honolulu. Peterson & Matthewman.
for plaintiff: Robertson & Wilder and
Russell 4 Watson for defendants-ap-
pellants.
c. Ming Him VS.. Young Tong ct al.
appeal from District Court of Homo
lulu. Peterson < Matthewman for
plaintiff: Robertson e. Wilder and Rus
sell & Watson for Acknowledgment
lent.
Frank c. BerteImann VS.. Susan Ber-
lehman ct al. original. Submission.
Davis and Brooks for plaintiff: An
drews. Peters a. Andrade for defend
ants.
VIM. A. Hall VS.. c. Wynam. appeal
from Judge. First Circuit. Kinney.
BaIlou & AcClanahan for planting:
Hartwell. Atkinson & Judd for defend
ant-appellant-
II. NJ. Levy VS. ". X AzbilI. excep-
lions from Circuit Court. First Cir
cult Davis for plaintiff: Magoon and
Dillon for defendant-appellant.
j. A Magoon. trustee. VS.. c. Lal
Young. appeal from Judge. First Cir
cult Aagoon and Dillon for plaintiff
appellant: Dickey for defendant.
II re Guardianship of Annie T X
Parker. appeal from Judge. First Cir
cult. Robertson & Wilder for guardi-
an, appellant; Dunno. guardian ad Ii
tenn
Territory of Hawaii VS.. Antoine Mar
tin. appeal from District Court OF Ho- |
nolulu. Attorney General for the Ter- |
ritory; De Bolt for defendant.
Territory of Hawaii vs.. Sing Kee. |
alias All Sam. appeal from District |
Tor the Territory; Correa for defend |
ant.
Isaac II. Kahilina VS.. Susan KahiIi- |
m. error to Circuit Court. First Cir |
cult. Poepoe for plaintiff in error: |
Kinney. Ballou * McClanahan for de- /
PENDANT IN error.
hcBryde Estate Ltd. vs. Gay & Rob-
inson. exceptions from Circuit Court. |
Fifth Circuit. Kinney. Ballou < Nc
Clanahan for plaintiff-appeliant: Rob-
ertson & Wilder for defendants.
kapioiani Estate Ltd. VS.. Mary H
Atcherly. appeal from Judge. First Cir
cult Kinney. Ballou & McClanahan
for plaintir-apPerlant; Dickey for de-
PENDANT.
Adelaide SchIief et nj. vs.. Jos. Clark
81 al. appeal from Judge. First Cir
cult. Andrews. Peters & Andrade for
plaintiffs: Russell * Watson for de-
fendants-appeilant.
Albert X Nawahi vs.. Hakaiau Plan
lation Co. Ltd. exceptions from Cir
cult Court. First Circuit. Magoon and
Dillon for plaintiff-appeilant: Hatch &
Slliiruan for defendant.
Robert Hind vs.. Eben +. Low. appeal
rom Judge. First Circuit. Aagoon e.
Dillon FOR plaintiff: Kinney. Ballou &
for defendant-appellant
III. Hackfeld & Co. Ltd. vs.. Hilo r. |
z Co. Ltd. error 20 Circuit Court
Fourth Circuit. Kinney. Ballou & Nc
,lanahan for plaintiffs in error: Hatch
Siiliman for defendant In error. A..
In the matter or the guardianship OF |
ames Hoare. appeal from Judge. First
'ircuit- Andrews. Peters 81 Andrade. a
Or guardians administrator. appel o.
INT: Kinney. Ballou * hcCianahan, =
or the beneficiary. -.
{ al. exceptions from Circuit Court
frst Circuit. Russell a Watson for
Robertson & Wilder
~ defendants.
Hawaiian Trust & Investment Co. vs..
nnie h Barton 81 al. exceptions from
ircutt Court. First Circuit. Kinney.
allou & Mechanism for PLAINTIFF
ppellant: Hatch & Siliiman. Robert
IN a Wilder. Holmes & Stanley and -
avis for defendants
J. q. Carter vs.. Sybil A Carter 81 al
ppeai from Judge. First Circuit Rob
'tson & Wilder for plaintiff: Kinney.
aliou & Mechanism. Holmes e. STAN
y and Fitch for defendants-appellant.
MARY X Tiboets VI. :. Pail. guard m
:. exceptions from Circuit Court. te
n1WA n