The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1902-12-09

e7 s.,

udrraut No. qua. -
so bills or approyals ny
ire board were found Gov
erInr this warrant. CHM
70. advised under date
~ November g. 1902, THE
Enclosed duplicate III
1Sg7 III covers the only trans
action with the Houston
board OF education from
MAY, 1900, 70 date. -,
J. W Hubert, Aggust. Is, lyol,
warrant Ne 422. $685. octeoet 80 M
? 1901 warrant No. Jo4, SOD lio "
No bills or approvals by
tho hoard were found Gov
ering these warrants; neltn-
or were these amounts due
J. W. Hubert. The indoFsc-
ments are apparently torg-
Hudson school Furniture com
pany, November 8, 1901, war
rant No. $40, s3776j; Decem-
her o. 1901, warrant No. 80
500. IS: December p lgl'
warrant No 576. S22O6j Do
cember o. 1901. warrant No.
Nh. S22065; December 9. 1901, =.
warrant No. 5Ts, SIPS 50. 49, lloo Il
No bills or approvals oy
the board were found COW
erlng these warrants, Inc
Hudson School Furniture
company advised under
date OF october ~. 1897:
1--WE have not sold the
school board Of Houston any
furniture except what is IN
cluded in s 9qT 90 in 3 sSe
exhibit r. schedule No. ?.
%. L. Jenkinson supply com
pahy. January 20, 1902, war ..o .,
rant No 625..............-... oo' %
No bills or approvals by
the board were FOUND COW
erlng this warrant Messrs.
Charlton, Dow and Barnett
disclrin all knowledge Of
the parties. nor could they
R. "A. Locke & Co., August 81.
1901, warrant No. 1873. ....:... PSI &
No bills or approvals by
the hoard were found Gov
erine this warrant MessTs.
Cbnrlton, Dow and Barnett
dsclsim all knowledge OF
the parties, nor could they
r. s. Lane February 10, 1907,
warrant No. 64S .............. 23f D
No bills or approval5 by
the beard we're found COW
erinz this warrant The In
dorsemeut is apparently
John ( Norm, January %. 1901,
warrant No $50 .......;-.. $50 .
No bills or approvals by
the board we're found COY
ering this warrant. j Il
NORM could not be seen,
but the Endorsement Is ap-
c. Il. Me- Movers & 60. September
q, 1900. warrant No. %,
ssh 80: June I, 1901, warrant
No SIS, $3.50; June I. 1901.
warrant No 304. SOS; Septem-
Der p, 1901, warrant No 4T4,
S5o3 ~ September %. 1901,
warrant No AS, Sl17; October
10. 1901, warrant No. 500,
gJEn 6ps Ncvar,ber Il 1o0I
warrant No. SOL, Sl73 10; No
vember q, 1901, warrant No.
554. S34l.65; January 20. 1902,
warrant No. 62T, 1928 60; jan
NARY -. 1902, warrant No COS,
warrant 70. ga, s8eo56. -. 2,s7a 6
No bills or approvals by
the board were found coy
eripC these warrants, and On
examination q the books n
c. II Myers & Co. failed TO
disclose any record OF sales
FOR these amounts. The IN
dorsements on these var
rants appear to be forger-
j. H Ma1ey. February 10, 1907,
warrant NJ. 666 ............. l39 s
No bills or nppr1valF hy
The board were found coy.
ering this warrant. J. H.
MaXey could not be seen,
hut the Endorsement Is ap-
pArently forgery.
1 RudersIorf & Simpson, July H.
| 1901, warrant No. 405 ......... 1888 Z
No bills or approvals by
the board were found GOV
eriug this warrant. MI
Rudersdorf advised verbal.
II that the Endorsement was
forgery
II Richardson & Co, September
q 1900, warrant No. ITO
s4s3.1o: April i, 1901, var,
rant No 332. $3.50 IS; June I,
1901, warrant No $50, s$l6,75,. $50 8
No bills or approvals by
the board were found COW
ering these warrants II.
! Richardson could not be 10
Gated, aud his partner.
| George Gaertner could NOT
| pass on either the indorse-
ments or the amounts. but
they are apparently forger-
John stadaer, January rs, 1902.
/ warrant No. go. S29s, rs; March
| II, 1902 warrant No. 6e4
/ $3.50. 60; March IL 1902, war
rant Nc COS, sl39. 90 March
| H. 1902, warrant No. 500,
SlSs: 60 Xiii. 80. III 5
the board were found GOV.
ering these warrants John
stadtler advised verbally
that the Endorsements we're
| forgeries
| L. j. Selby, November a. 1901
warrant No. 547 .......' ,eo (
No bills or approvals bv ''
the board were found COW
! ering this warrant l..
se!hy was not seen, but Mis-
Houston representative pro-
nounced the Endorsement
forgerr
7. S. yerette, May IS, 1901. vsr.
! rant No $50 ........... ~ =
No bills or approvals Nv 90
the board were found coy
erlns this warrant; peithar
was the amount due 7
Nerette. The Endorsement is
plalnlv a forgery.
r; y. Williams Septembar 80
1901. warrant No AZ? $40 *
! November rs. 1901 wnyrsD.
No, 553. S73. 90. -. =.
No bils or approvals nv loo o
the board were found cor.
erlng these warrants. z "
Williams advised verhsliv
Tar the Endorsements are
foreerles are
Warrants outstanding which a-s .,n.-
emily fraudulent: are appar
In favor OF aud Ininrsaa
nIS1neT, Smith & Co, Julv "a Auluunl
| l1N-, warrant No SD NJ