Arizona republican., 1902-02-22
DIVORCE DAY
Broken Into by Judge BuTnett5 Case
 Against the County.

On aoCount Of the a-!ldsy today the
 wa kIy law dcy was h2iI yesterday. 1 II v-a devoted mainly to th- correction
 CT ,ne mistakes O; r1i,listsrs If the Eos- p-i and justices Of the peace and others
 whom the law cuthaifzcs Co unit poo
 Vla in marriage. All other business t-aSaotod at the session yesterday was
 u-''ai and u1iUnortant il comparison. The ii.st Of the divorce co-c- was that of Mrs. Hattie Ea.ser against Emil itauSlf- The parties had been mar. 2 within three days of d~t-rl months and.
 '-e'1ffiH@ t2 the evidence. tle defend ant in all that time never let the sun "r1cSnd upon a sober dav. He returned
 home at all hlG.z oc the iight between
 midnight and ilorailg and iavaria1 1Iy- disturbed the peace e his wife and Stsp-chidro1. Fie sometimes whipped
 h-S Wlte with a rope. Nhel he fiaally went away. nearly year ago. to his former home in Switzerland he took "h-t Tcney she had saved. amounting t' about $500. Upon this showing a divorce was accorded. AGrs. HaUser's ott-r7ey asked if she desired to bs ia of the name of Haussr. The replied with emphasis tha- she did and the rare of her former husband was re- stored t0 her.
 The next ca~, wac that of A. T.. fgawley against F Ina Brlwl-y. This wa" a'-S Hrie, wBtriwoHial alliance.
 fhe trouble. the ulaintiG said. began when his wife afuSed t1 cook his meals for him. notwithstanding he was abori- CGsly employed in brick yard. At last she went away and. Ee uud stood. fell into im.rat-l r.9ctio~-. lie was given decree
 I.ra css" Of Nfrs. crIc- M. Gr'cuer against Calvin r. Gris1ar was th- most Interesting. ft was brought o,lt cu tN. ,iD-Cu" that about six y-ars ago. while the rar,its were living in Pres C" tt the TlaiutiT. who was i2 i'll health, ali -ha suggestion Of her hus5aad. weut to San Diego to spend sCrl- tine with h"r mother. A few months l-ter tha ce aldant went to S,eakt1u. Cal. She said that rct loaE after that she re- ceiv1l . letter and a telegram f--m him Informing har that he was dead. This st@tament was corrected. the witness -'eaai1e that she had received the l-tter and telegram. which purrnrtcd to lC-Ts ftl!u aDttEH. ron IT. 4.e- %r8r1 Vas received Grst and then the l-t,-r. which wac intended either to corr. acr.te c'la story or Crieuer's death . C" -'=n t7 convey the information ,ha- h' demise vas not g case ar suspended arii-ot5o-. but that Ee v-a= stiU dead. . The witness edns-eaa found tla 1.-- fald.ut alivs at Williams and che at atlel1"arI saw hirl at Prescott. when. he ef DE- -1 oee heir litria girl She 'cft-Tward met him in plrnrtV. ta- last r---tin= being about two wasf= ago. During their separation 1E7=. Gl-=ner had never received any support from he~ hus1aud- X deere, was granted.
 Tn the ease Of tha Utah Canal En- l0---r-- -- and EEte1sioa company vs. ". A- pa2gs et al. L-t;rl EillUT= Was sg Silut-5 for William lI. Ellup-. one of tho def udaEts~ and S. A. Bolton Was added to th- IiaJ Of tho defendants.
 A wC-icn to dismiss 'E- appeal was denied in the case c- Lena Hartsield vs. ~. r. Jones.
 N do70vrr-r was argued ig the case of Justice J. 1f- Burn it against Mari c9ul county. rt was taken under ad- wis --1t. This is a very interesting case which s.aW out or % mi-ua.1---- standing between tH- Ulaiatra and the tiia el-tIiat attorneys gflc- r-e-riil.- the fees of the u'aiatir. During the July quarter a vc.rint va issue f.-e.l ;ra l3Ice of Justice Burnett not only n.- al the direction pf the district att.r- nes but against his wish. The fees iu tnGt case and i1 aU9char iu the sam, 4l-i l-i -.Iiin Ii't "a .s eI'- All the Ices for the quarter amounted to au,-t sa.o. Tn- beard ol sura.FiscTs ol t1e advice of the district attorney. rejected the fees 1 tE- two cases mentioned. ard tn. justice. refusing t1 accept any part os bis claim, Drought suit t. recover all. < breach having hz-a established be- "#e1 tGe oiiC.s nf the tlstiea and tre li~'-ict attorney. an warrants issr-I turing tho ensuing quarter and 10 tl.
 ras lt time hava been issued without '1-srltatio1 with tha district att1r1s.. >-a action was taken r- th- board out aa fustisa claim for the p zr quarta~ { b. vin~ been decided to await the re- ' Ji .f the bending action.
 Justice Hur7-t- attacks the IaN uu- gal" which tl:e district attorney is act- .a H~,u twa grounds. Tn i1st I-gls- atII. parsed " law requiring that il III in"ts located in county aeats the ." ,ises may not issue warrants with .r- the advice sf the district attorn-.--| T-ir laV- i= oDDert.I tp in thr nret 'iae- as. ue= it is special l-Eisiatioa. nasH-'ii "s it is apal.cs ble only to c-r- ain precincts and mot to all and is h.. --oEe iu gc1tTayr-tisu of the or