Evening journal., 1902-11-06
CASES FOR TRIAL
AND ARGUMENT
List of Causes to be Tried at
the November Term of
Court
CONTAINS MANY DIVORCE CASES
indications That Term viii Sc a Long
One As There Are ll2 Cases, In
cluding a Large Number of Damage

suits
The trial lists for the November term
Of the Superior Court has been issued,
and are now at the prothonotary's Of
flee ready for distribution. The list
contains 112 cases for trial. The causes
follow:
Maggie IT, Jamisoi VS.. James II. S.
Gam and Paul Gillis, Sheriff; Frank a.
Mitchell VS.. Joseph e. Martin Il. T.
Warner VS.. Sarah S. England; Thomas
]. Burris VS.. Della Sharp; john Ma,
Farlane VS.. Garrett & Barr; William E.
Anderson VS.. Delaware Construction
Company; John w and Mary E.
Pennington VS.. john T. lewis; Martha
IL. Canuon for the use of William Sut-
lton VS.. r., w. & p. r. r. Co; John =.
Donahoe VS.. the Star Publishing Com
Ipany; william Craig VS.. Mart'a T.
Burris ;St. Stanishlaus Beneficial Society
vs.. St. Hedwigs Church; St Jossphs
Polish Catholic Beneficial Society
VS.. Sd. Hedwig's Church. Adams tx
press Company VS.. John Albert Sender
Ling; Prudential Insurance Company
Tvs Charles e. Maser; w. d N. II. Il.
Dairymen's Protective Association vs..
George w. Cooley; John II. Dagger vs.
William Ii. Chrchman; john II. Dagger
Tvs. Philip Q. Churchman; William li.
IEIassey's administrator VS.. the Diamond
statc Steesl Company; JAMES c. Ru-
tan vs.. Patrick E'ahey; Courtland
Wagon Company VS.. JOnn p. Springer .
administrator; Nina Reisman VS.. Harry
M. Saltman; Horace Vaughan VS.. Alex
lander Maxwell; Edward Burns vs. Com
nercial ire Insurar .e Company; John
iB. sIcAllister VS.. Peoples Railway Com
many; Gideon Sibley vs.. B. 6 .. r. r.
leo; State of Delaware. use of William
,lH. Hurley. vs. Augustus Hushebeck;
ICharles e. Pyle VS.. Susannah Pyle; w.
a. n. R. r. CO. vs.. Arthur r. kee, ct al,
Road Commissioners of New Castle
Hundred: Helen NanachowslKis ad-
ministrator VS.. Wilmington City Rail
lway Company: Eva Szymansh vs.
/, liz. Blumenthal & Co.; John 7. DuflosS'
ct al. VS.. Harry f. Hobson; John Gam
VS.. Absalom COrdery; Felix Gildea VS..
p. & R. r. r. Co; Margaret Conner, by
, her next friend, Michael j. Conner vs.
tPeoples Railway Company; Jennie h
> Blackburn VS.. f.. Blumenthal a Co.
Narbara MCGOWAN, ct al, VS.. B. & T.
& In. r. Co.: Mary MaXtield VS.. Peoples
, Railway Company; Maria Perillo vs.
delaware Granite and Mining Com
. many: Charles Reynolds adminlstraAoi
vs August II. Viewig; Robert Guy
q executor VS.. James Richardson; Freder-
D lick c. Snyder VS.. Peoples Railway COM
+ many. Raffaele Di GuglielmO VS.. M. Me
- gary & Son; Henry X. Armstrong VS.
I George B. w. RhOades; Meter Brothels
VS.. Harry J. Stoeckle, mgr, garnlshee
of Sarah Nester; Minnie Harris vs.
George w. Wilkie; Thomas }. Goslll
VS.. Wilmington Aerie, No. "A, Fraterna
Order of Eagles; William White VS.
Peter McCloskey; use of Thomas u
= vnam. Florence NJ. Servison VS.. Con
inecticute Fire Insurance Company gar
nishee of John H. O'Donald; use oi
Thomas ID. lyman, Florence M. Servi'
SON VS.. Mutual Insurance Company ol
{ chester. garnishee of John ODonald
j Mabel II. Collision VS.. Clarence q. hlrki
y Alexander Faber VS.. Standard Lime anc
e stone Company; Harry Roberts vs. H.
5 G II Co: Leslie Davis VS.. Peoples
IRailwav Company; Maria Perillo VS.
J, Iobn Norris Robinson; BENJAMIN. ia
D vid's administrator VS.. Leonaro
/ V Aspril. Sr; Elmer T.. OoA
e adrosnistrator VS.. Wilmington CltS
railway Company; Marie A. Hoxi'
,,s T-bonas Davidson, administrator
Y 81 al samuel r. Rice VS.. p, w. q b
. railroad Company. ct al; Sarah a
I, CORN VS.. Robert A. COnaway's s aainlu
= ietrats. Jerome S. Shepard ct al, VS.
Z HERCULES Powder Company, garnlsne'
y 81 rosenb w. Millard: Robert !. Conl
Y NC samuel A. Mcdaniel; Diamond
a State Bo.tling Company VS.. People
Railway Company; Emmett Morrow VS.
same. Charles Sines, an infant, We
Peoples Railway Company; Andrew
.,undon VS.. same: Mollie l.. Smith Vs
Il Tobn I, McIaughlin, constable; Anni
n Foian. widcw, VS.. the Mayer and Couh
is cil of Wilmington; Nathan Barsky vs.
lip ~. & b. Railroad Company; Mar.
u Neal VS.. Catherine McGrenna al
illustrators: John Howard Morris vs.
Wilmington City Railway Company
I IoeoDh Petit VS. William T. Colmary
Fvan Lewis VS.. White Bros; Huld
Johnson VS.. Sirger Manuiacturln
rs Company: William C. Lattomus vs.
William e. Hawkins; Artemas Smlu
We Wilmington Savings Fund Society
Martin e. Smith VS.. Frank G. Stidham
lg II Rlumenthal g. Co. vs. p, w. a L
s Railroad Company: Edward /. Film
ar VS.. same; Joseph II. Blatz's admins
n tratcr VS.. same; Charles Colburn V'
1t PEOPLES Railway Company; Richar
1t Emmons vs.. William II. Morris
ID Charles L. Walker VS.. Delaware Gran
k. ite ard Mining Company; William i
10 Klair vs. T.. W. G B. Rairosd Com
70 any: United States use Of Lnhan
h 10. VS.. John JacOby; Joseph L. Car
Al nte-. Sr.. vs. Jchn p. Allmoni
le ! seph Roberts VS.. p, w. & z. Raj
IS road Company; Charles L. Thomas v.
sr Riggs & Bd-rell, Bsatrice Leitch VI
ID Sue G. Elliott; Albert Frankisa "
N same; Francis Harvey Day VS.. Gilpi