The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1902-04-21
THE APRIL
SESSION
TheSupremeCourt
Will Meet
Today.
IMPORTANT CASES
ARE COMING UP
The Kamalo Sugar Company Case
Nay Be Advanced on
Calendar.

The April session of the Supreme
Court, will be opened at 10 o'clock this
morning. The docket for the term con-
tains thirty-one cases. Nearly all OF
them are, however, new appeals, hav-
ing been filed since the close OF the last
session.
/ There are many cases of interest to
be heard at this time. There are sever
a, matters submitted upon agreed state
ments of fact; and one appeal upon a
controversy between Secretary Cooper
and Auditor Austin.
The Kamalo Sugar Co. case will prob
ably be among the first to be heard at
this term. there being motion to ad-
vance still pending. The writ in the
case of Walter G. Smith is made re-
turnable today, and the matter will
probably be presented immedia tely,
habeas corpus proceedings having the
right of way. Smith & Lewis and An
drews, Peters & Andrade appear for
the petitioner, and the Attorney Gener-
al for the High Sheriff, who is respond
ent. George Davis, who appeared in
the Circuit Court as amicus curia, does
not appear as attorney on the printed
calendar, but it has been the practice
IL the past to allow special attorneys
to appear with the Attorney General.
and Davis, if he makes the request,
will no doubt be given such an oppor-
| tunity.
The following is the court calendar,
as made up for the session.:
| II. Hackfeld & Co. Ltd. VS.. Hilo r. r.
Co. Ltd. Error TO Circuit Court Fourth
| circuit. Kinney. Ballou & McClanahan
and W Use for plaintiff in error. Hatch &
| Siliiman and Smith & Parsons for defend
ant in error.
Exceptions from Circuit Court, First cir
cult Brown and Hankey for plaintiff
Andrews. Peters & Andrade for defend
ant-appellant.
In re guardianship of Kalua Kapukini
Re-hearing appeal from Judge, First cir
cult. Magoon & Dillon for the guardian |
appellant Fitch & Thompson for the
ward.
Territory of Hawaii VS. ]. H. SchnacR
and two others. Exceptions from Cir
cult Court, First circuit. Davidson for |
prosecution. Kinney, Ballou & McClana- |
han for defendants.
Henry L. Cooper VS.. II. G. Austin. |
Plaintiffs appeal from Auditors ruling. |
Plaintiff in person. Attorney General for |
defendant
Honolulu Investment Co. VS. H. Row |
land ct al. Exceptions from Circuit |
Court, First circuit. Davis for plaintiff. |
Kinney, Ballou & McClanahan and An
drews, Peters & Andrade for prosecution. |
Wise for defendant.
Territory of Hawaii VS.. All Moon. Ex-
ceptions from Circuit Court Fourth cir
cult. Attorney General for prosecution.
Wise for defendant.
7. r. Mossman VS.. S. B. Dole ct al. Sub
mission Castle & Weaver for plaintiff.
Kinney, Ballou & Mechanism, Holmes &
Stanley and Attorney General for de-
PENDANTS.
In the matter of the estate of E. N.
Bidwell. Appeal from Judge. First cir
cult. Smith & Lewis for guardian-appel-
liant. Hatch & Silliman for petitioner
Jesse Makainai VS.. Goo Wan Hoy. APP |
peal from District Court of Honolulu.
Achi & Johnson for neutrality-suspicious.. |
Holmes & Stanley for defendant.
Sister Albertina VS.. Kapiolani Estate,
Ltd Exceptions from Circuit Court.
First circuit. Peterson & Matthewman
for plaintiff-appellant. Kinney, Ballou &
MeClanahan for defendant.
S Ahmi. VS.. w. H. Cornwell. Jr Ex-
captions from Circuit Court, Second cir |
cult. Coke for plaintiff-appellant. Hons
for defendant
H. x. hitchcock ct al VS.. +. HuStace |
ct al. Appeal from Judge, First circuit
Davis. Magoon e Dillon, Hatch & Sill
man and T. McCants Stewart for plain
TIM Robertson & Wilder Kinney, Bal
lou * McClanahan and Hankey for de-
fendants-ippellant
T. NJ. Harrison VS. J. A Magoon eft al |
Exceptions from Circuit Court, First cir
cult Robertson & Wilder for plaintiff
kinney Sallou & Mechanism for defend
ants-appelant
L
Appeal froAl District Court OF Honolulu
Peterson x NIatthewman for plaintiff De
Bolt for acknowledgement
IN the matter of Walter G.. Smith Ha-
peas CORPUS. Smith & Lewis and An
dews, Peters Z Andrade for petitioner
Attorney Genera for High sheriff re-
spondent.
A. A Montana vs. w r. Castle. An
peal from Judge, FIRST circuit Andrews.
Refers & Andrade fer plaintiff. Weaver
for defendant-appellam
NJ Phillips & Co VS. Lee Cbono a+ .,
Appeal from District Court of Honolui,
Peterson & Matthewmah for plaintirY
Robertson Il Wilder and Russell & Wat |
son for defendants ppeIlaht.
Z. Ming Him VS.. Young Tong ct al. An
pear from District Court of Honolulu. Pc
terson & Matthewman for plaintiff. Rob
ertson & Wilder and Russell &. Watson |
for ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
sister Albertina Kapolani Estate |
-tu- exceptions from Circuit Court
First circuit. Peterson & Matthewman
Tor plaintiff appellant Kinney Ballou &
for defendant
FRANK G Bertelmann VS.. Susan Bertel-
mann ct al Original. Submission Davi.
Tor plaintiff. Andrews Peters & Andrade
md t. McCants Stewart for defendants
VIM a Hail VS.. G. Wynam. Appeal
rom judge. First circuit. Kinney. Bal ,
GU & McCianahan for plaintiff Hartweu.
atkinson & Judd for defendant-appellant
n. NJ. Levy VS.. W. X Azbiu Excep la
ions from Circuit Court FIRST circuit lo-