The Wichita daily eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1890-1906, 1902-06-03
SUPREME COURT
BAR DOCKET is
DULY ASSIGNED
Mo Other Business Transacted
by the Judges.
NEW MEMBERS PRESENT
List of Cases Set for Trial Ex-
ceptionalIy Large.

Guthrie. 0. T.. June 2.-The jane term
al the old judges except Burfcrd pres
ent. as well as Paucoast. Be4ucha1np
ard Gllett. the newly appointed. No
other business except the following dis
position Of the docket was transacted.
The number OF eases is exceptionally
large:
No. n75. Herd ct al VS.. United States.
Pawnee county; continued
No. 11S4. Canada VS.. Territory of Ok
lahoma. Canadian county; continued.
Nc. KS. Runnels ". Territory OF
Oklahoma. Canadian county: continued.
No. 94S. Hunt, guardian. VS.. GerIand
ct al, Logan county; dismissed
No. I094. CriSs vs. Cosby, Canadian
county; submitted
No. I13S. Dempsey vs. Watson, Grant
county; talSen on demurrer.
No. 114S Swartzberger vs. Dickerson.
Pottawatomie county; continued.
No. 1145. Moorehead VS.. Davis. Blaine
county: dismissed.
No 1854 City OF Guthrie vs. lille.
Logan county; taken on motion 20 dis
miss.
No. Ils7. Comstock VS.. EagIeton, Paw
nee county; taken on briefs.
Chicl1asaw Grocery company vs. Gran
ite Mercantile company. Hiowa county;
dismissed by plaintiff.
No 1s5. Smith VS.. Young CT al, Noble
county; taken on motion TO dismiss.
No 1f72. Blair VS.. Trulock et al Ca
h. dihn county; dismissed.
No III. Wakefield VS.. Dyer, Cana
dian county; taken on briefs.
No 11SL School district No. 81 VS..
Peninsula Trust company, Garfield coun-
ty; continued.
No. 1lS2- Michael VS. Murphy. ct al.
Oklahoma county, taken on briefs.
No. dlSS- Peoples bank vs.. Frick
company. Garfield county; taken on
briefs.
No. 1S5. Williams VS.. Farmers Gin
company. Cleveland county; taken on
briefs.
No nS9 Racey vs.. Racey ct al,
Grant county; dismissed
No. 119s.-Hodges ys, Concord. Oklaho-
ma county: taken on briefs.
No. 119). Christie VS.. City of King
fisher. Kingfisher county; continued.
No. I2L2 Greeamyer VS.. Coate, Kay
county; taken on briefs.
No. I21S-Aultman VS.. Speaks, Logan
county: taken on motion 70 dismiss.
No. I2i5. Fitzgerald vs.. Foster. Logan
county taken on plaintiffs brief.
No. 1916. Godfrey VS.. Hutchinson Gro
cery company. Grant county; taken on
motion TO quash and dismiss.
No. 1917. Dipest vs. Hopkins, Wood
ward county: taken on briefs.
No. 121S. Myers ct al Us. Citizens bank.
Of Chickasha. Caddo county; dismissed.
No. 1918. Rudd VS.. Dunlap. Pottawat-
omie county: taken on briefs
No. 1220 Edmission rs. F1atto Commits
sion company. Woods county; taken on
motion 20 dismiss and suggestions Ia
opposition.
No. l221- 3fcC1ung VS.. Penny. Kay coun-
y. submitted: plaintiff given thirty days
in which 10 file brief, and defendant
given ten days in which to answer.
No. 1Z23. Hardcastle vs.. Bailey, Caddo
comfy; taken on demurrer and motion.
No. 1924. Penny VS.. Richardson. Noble
county; taken on briefs.
No 1225 Divers VS.. Edwards. Caddo
county; taken on motion 20 dismiss.
No. 1928 Efesier VS.. Momsen, Cleve~
land county; continued
No. 123G. Dickson. sheriff, Us. Waldo,
PottawatoInfe county; continued.
No. 1Z5l. 1ngraham vs.. Schafer. Cana
dian county; passed
No i22A Southwestern Cottonseed OIL
Co.. vs.. Tank or Stroud, Lincoln county /:
taken on triefs.
No ~ Territory Of Oklahoma. ex.
rel. Crosby. county attorney, Us. Crum,
probate Jrdee Csddo county. defendant
allowed Until Tune Z 70 fje return.
No l2SS. Territory Of Oklahoma, ex rel
Stevens. county attorney. vs. Brown.
probate Judge. Comanche county: taken
OF motion to dis;aiss and for jury trial.