Wausau pilot. [volume] (Wausau, Wis.) 1896-1940, 1902-02-18

Judge SlIVeftlOrn was DOlQlnE court Il I
Merrill. he was taken to Merrill before
the court, plead guilty and was sem
fenced to one year in states prison.
The State OF Wisconsin VS.. Ad. Benz
beneck. This defendant was arrested
a 9en the charge of using abusive and
obscene language to one Katie Gas
kowski. The defendant was found
guilty and fined $50 and costs, amou4Sv
ing ia all to SS3.62. which was paid.
The State of Wisconsin W. Pearl
Bryan and Mary Goodwin These de-
PENDANTS were arrested upon complaint
charging them with being inmates of
house of i'll fame 10 the town of Stettin.
They were brought into court, plead
guilty and paid fine of $40 and costs
each, which money was paid 20 Justice
Jones and ny him paid over to the coun-
ty treasurer.
The state of Wisconsin vs.. Bessie
Mcneil This defendant WAS charged
with being an inmate of IA house OF i'll
fame in the town of Stettin. The de-
PENDANT plead guilty and was fined $50
and costs, which amount WAS by her
turned over to Justice Jones and ny him
paid to the county treasurer.
The State of Wisconsin VS.. Joseph
Noiseaux.-Thisd defendant was charged
with theft and upon being brought into
court asked for an adjournment. which
was granted. Upon the return day the
com plaining witness did not appear and
the state was compelled to dismiss the
case.
The State of Wisconsin vs.. Peter Rel
ter.-This young boy was charged with
embeZzlement by Geo. Klein of this
city. He was found guilty and SEN
fenced to 30 days in the county Jail, be-
ing OF too tender age to send to states
prison.
The State of Wisconsin vs.. August
Ebersold. This defendant was charge ed
with the offense of deserving his wife
and refusing to support her. The case
is still pending in the municipal court
OF this county.
The State of Wisconsin VS.. Jacob
Schaumberger- This defendant was ar
rested on the charge OF murder. The
otfense charged was committed on the
west side in the city of Wausau. He
was given a preliminary examination
before The municipal court and was
bound over to the circuit court for trial.
bail being fixed at $1,000 which IS fur
uIOn6Q HIS CdSt Will DC QlSDOSGu u
at the February term of circuit court,
1902
The State of Wisconsin VS.. Arthur
johnson and w. Holbrook These de-
PENDANTS were arrested npon the charge
OF burglary. They had preliminary
examination on the 18th day of Novem-
Der and were bound over 10 the circuit
court for trial, bail being fixed at $500.
Being unable to furnish it they were
committed to Jail
The State of Wisconsin vs.. Jos. Sum-
mers. This young man was arrested
for stealing bicycle belonging to one
Dalnodar. He was convicted and bound
over to the circuit court for trial. He
later requested to be allowed to plead
guilty and was sentenced by the county
jud ge to the Industrial School at Wau-
kesha.
The State of Wisconsin VS.. Chas
Schmeiser.-Thi defendant was arr
rested November 18th upon complaint
for burglary. He waived preliminary
examination and was bound over to the
circuit court for triai, bail being fixed
at the sum of 1866. He requested to he
10 plead guilty and was brought
before the court and sentenced to four
years in states prison at Waupun.
The State of Wisconsin VS.. Ernst
This defendant was arrested
upon complaint of the village board of
the village of Athens for selling liquor
to "a person that had been posted The
case was to be tried on Dec. 30. | went
to Athens and found that it was neees-
sary to dismiss the case for the reason
that the docket of the justice WAS de-
fectlve. There was Il new complaint
made and the man re-arrested, and on
affidavit of prejudice being filed the
case was removed TO Jus. G. G. Barrett
at Edgar and the case will be tried Jan.
ID, 1902 at o'clock.
The State of Wisconsin vs. Thos.
Shadduck. This young man was ar
rested in the village of StratfOrd upon
the complaint of Len Sargent for lar
ceny. He was convicted and sentenced
to the Industrial School at WaukeSha.
Edith Bahr, a young girl, was at the
request of her parents committed to the
Industrial School for Girls at Milwau-
kee.
Diana Bourcier and Mary Koehler
were sent to that school upon complaint
being made by their fathers.
Hatwick Eggebrecht, fifteen years of
age, was on complaint of her mother
committed to the school at Milwaukee.
Chas. Brunz, a young boy of tender
years, was upon complaint committed
to the state school at Sparta. 1t was
found that his parents abused him and
did not take proper care of him.
In addition TO The cases above mem
toned, there is pending in the circuit
court the case of John Feltis VS.. Mara
thou county ct al.-This was an action
commenced originally by 2. H. Dowl
ing to restrain the issuing of certain
orders to the defendants in this case.
These appropriations were made at the
general meeting OF your honorable body
in 1901. You will remember that at
the tine the appropriations were made
| advised you that some of the apprO-
priations were illegal and that the
county board bad 90 authority to make
the same. This case will be disposed
OF at our February 1902 term.
An action was commenced in circuit
court by the Marathon Land Company
against Marathon county to set aside
certain tax deed. The papers were
served on March %, 1901. As the three
year statute of limitation had not run
upon this deed the same could be set
aside. As the plaintiff expressed his
to pay the taxes, the case
was settled on that basis without costs.
| made report upon this matter at
former meeting of your honorable body.
On March %, 1901. the Northern
Land Company commenced an action in
circuit court against Marathon county
and Anton Mehl, its county treasurer,
to set aside certain taxes in the town of
Pike Lake. On the 10Th of May this
Ease was settled between the authorities
Of the town OF Pike Lake and the plain
tiff and the case dismissed without
costs.
On the Goth day Of April, 1901. the
Joseph Dessert Lumber Company COM
nenced an action in the circuit court
against the town of Pike Lake, Mara
thon county and others. to set aside
AK certificates issued upon its lands.
This action is still pending and will be
tried at our February term of the cir
,uit court.
On May Is, 1901, G. d. Jones com
nenced an action in the circuit court