The Stark County Democrat. [volume] (Canton, Ohio) 1833-1912, 1902-05-02
THE MAY TERM
Of Court Begins Next
Monday.
FIRST ASSIGNMENT
Includes Many Divorce Cases.
Grand Jury viii lnvesti-
gate I'm portant
Matters.

The first assignment Of the May
term of court has been made by the
clerk of courts under direction of the
judges. AS is the custom, the first
fifty cases on the calendar have been
set for trial. but it is not expected
that many of them will be ready for
hearing. The assignment includes
quite number Of divorce cases and
some other court cases. AS the juries
will not report until the second or
third week, it is probable that great
many OF the divorce cases will be
heard
The grand jury will report next Mon
day morning at the opening of court
and will at once take up the matter
of investigating the crimes committed
in the county since the last grand jury
met. The most serious crime that
will come before it will be that COM
mitted by Mrs. Sarah Robinson, who
is in Jail charged with murder in the
first degree.
Following is the assignment:
ROOM NO. JUDGE HARTER.
Monday, May 5-Hearing motion
docket. The Troy Carriage Co.'S
Rec'r VS.. BerGold ct al; Ferguson VS..
Pool ct al; George ID. Harter bank ct
al. VS.. Canton Pottery company:
Friedman VS.. Meredith ct al; South.
ern Ohio Loan and Trust company vs..
Manguis ct al.
Tuesday, May 6-Mahaffey VS.. Bjorls-
man ct al; Hoffman vs.. Hoffman ct
al; Kolb vs. Kolb.; Dodd vs. Wrought
Iron Bridge company; Reynolds vs..
Myers.
Wednesday, May 7.-Maser vs.. the
L. E. A. e w. r. X. Co.; Hammerly VS..
Essig Window company ct al; Vickers
VS.. Davis ct al; in matter of the estate
of Samuel Hoffman, deceased; Rohn
VS.. Rohn.
Thursday. May s.-Wernet VS..
Thiery; Woodling VS.. Woodling: Hook
VS.. Hook ct al; Miller VS.. Correll:
Henry VS.. Henry.
Friday, May 9.-I.awbaugh vs. law
baugh ct al; Russell Co., VS.. Reed,
auditor; Harter ct al VS.. Harkins ct
al; Hoffman VS.. Hoffman; Lothamer
VS.. I.othamer ct al.
ROOM NO JUDGE AMBLER.
Monday, May 5-Hearing motion
docket and impaneling grand jury.
Graham VS.. Vet. MemI Assn ct al;
Madden VS.. Webb ct al; Williams VS..
Balizet ct al; Hanback, VS.. Auseon
ct al.
Tuesday. May 6.-Barry VS.. Scott
Martin VS.. Martin: Eyster VS. Eyster;
McDougal VS.. McDougal: Robson VS..
the Penpa Co.
Wednesday. May Fries Adm'r'x
VS.. Paul; Braucher ct al vs. Strausser,
supervisor; Wagner, trustee. VS.. How
erland ct al; Ohio Elk Rel Bowman
VS.. the Sandyville & Waynesburg r.
II. C.. Tindall VS.. Tindall.
Thursday, May 8.-Tiesche vs.. Ties
che: Coates VS.. the Stark County Tele-
phone company; Russells guardian
VS.. Glass ct al; Siebert vs.. Siebert:
Willis VS.. nevore.
Friday, May 9.-Sprankle VS.. Styer
ct al; Renzenbrink vs. Renzenbrink;
Zettler VS.. Hammerly: Rice vs.. Rice:
Melbourne VS.. Melbourne. /
DIVORCE PETITION.
Oscar Haines, of Canton, has filed
q petition in common pleas court
through his attorney. w. J. Piero.
asking divorce from Leona Haines on
the ground OF infidelity. They were
married in Carrollton October IT. 1900.
and have no children. The husband
alleges that he has been good, but that
his wife has kept company with othcr |
men at Hanover, Minerva and Alliance. !
The couple have been separated for a
year or more past. The wife resides |
at Minerva.
ASSIGNMENT.
Mrs. Margaret Koser, of Canton,
herself with a lot of encum-
bered real estate on her hands, filed a |
deed of assignment in probate court
afternoon at 2:30. and Attor-
ney Homer V. Briggle was named as
assignee.
The full amount of the assets and
liabilities has not been determined,
but the encumbrance amounts to about
$4,000.
ASSIGNMENTS ARE FEW.
The records of the probate judges
office show that there have been fewer
the last six months than
ever before in the history of the coun-
ty. But three assignments have been