Bisbee daily review., 1902-06-15
q LIBEL SUIT
 AT TOMBSTONE.
PROBATE JUDGE sosTwick SUES
 JAMES GREELEY.

a9cS.-Sourt Wos'h9 hatheF S'o"
 N.-Another Murder Trial Begun. Tombstone, June, 14th.-After the dismissal of the case against Sebastian Duran, the attention of the court was occupied in the case of Garrett vs. Gar rstt for divorce, in which decree was granted to the plaintiff. There being DO criminal case that could be hrought before the court the trial jur- CTS were excused until this morning at 2 o'clock.
 During the past week number of new cases have been filed in the clerks office Among the new cases are the following:
 c. w. Howe vs. Catherine S. Howe, divorce.
 C. P. Bostwick vs. Jos. Reilly libel. NJ R. Harln vs. Modern Copper Co; mandamus.
 W. S. Gray vs. Martha J. Gray; di- vorce.
 Doyle vs. Cochise County; for fees. David Care vs. Grace Care; divorce. H. Gerwein vs. Arizona Clay Manu- featuring Company; attachment.
 Joseph Tasker vs. San Reno Copper Co; debt; attachment
 William Shilliam vs. Cochise coun- ": debt.
 E. Calves vs. F. Calves, divorce A. Provost vs. Oliver Olsen; account. Upon court convening this morning number of motions were made.
 Case of Gerwein vs. Arizona Clay Manufacturing Co.,; case set for June 10th
 Wittig vs Wittig, divorce case which was continued, was called and set for Monday.
 Attorney Cornell, who is defending Chris Hansen, offered an affidavit from Dr. Edmundson, stating that defendant vas sick and would not be able to ap- pear for trial at this term of court. No action was taken by the court on the affidavit.
 Case of the territory vs. Cruz Fi- gueroa and Juan Moreno, charged with the murder of George Ashton, at Carr 5 month of December last was called. A jury wGs procured and the case pro eeeded with and owing to the number of witnesses will not be concluded un- iii Monday. Attorneys English and Goodbody were entered as associate counsel with the district attorney for the prosecution, and Attorney Lowell with G. w. Swain, for the defense.
 Tn the case of c. R. Bostwick vs James Reilly Attorney Goodbody made . motion that plaintiff be required to file bond for costs. This case, which fs brought on alleged libel, was in stituted on account of an article pub Rshed in the Tucson Citizen over the signature of the defendant In the complaint the plaintiff alleges tha, the article as published attacks hi: honesty. integrity and reputation. anc exposes him to hatred, contempt an( hdicule, to injure his efficiency in hi'
 
 m carrying out his legitimate business enterprises, to his great injury ant damage, for which he sues for SIS 5,00, as judgment and costs of suit The ar ticIe upon which the suit is brought | as follows:
 Tombstone. Ariz., April |. To the Editor of the Citizen:
 In late issue of your paper appear m article to the effect that Probat Judge Bostwick, of this county. an associates, have incorporated tn Bunker Hill Mining Company. Ths they owned .hve claims adjoining tn Tombstone Consolidated Mining Con pany, now under the management ( E. B. Gage, these claims being locate en the line of the new railroad, abo' two miles north of Tombstone. an siat the property produced $500 900 gold and silver. in former prosperOl days of Tombstone. It Is said tn; NIT Gage tried hard to secure the pro erty, etc, etc.
 Now, MT. Editor. it appears to n that your reporter got fill" I ha' ned in Tombstone for more ths twenty-one years, and I think that know all of the mines and mimi claims in. at or about Tombstone. al particularly those north, northea and northwest of Tombstone. for abo ten miles or more, and I can asse that there is not a mining claim in 1