Evening bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1895-1912, 1902-12-17
WIRELESS A M|STR|A[
IT COULD NOT Be
CONCLUDED IN TINE
SUPREME COURTS ASSUMPTION
OF NEWSPAPER CONTROL.
CRAWFORD is IN
TROUBLE.

TROUBLE.
Nigel Jackson's bail for arson was
Fixed at $4,000. Lorrin Andrews, his
counsel. wanted 1t made $4,000.
w. Austin whiting reporting as COM
missioner in the case of Harriet Bailey
ct al. VS.. Elizabeth Cushingham ct al.
says that the premises at King and
Bethel streets can now be sold, the
law suit having been settled. The Wal
kik property has been plotted and
surveyed and divided into fifteen lots
SO that they can be partitoned If de-
Birable.
Willie Crawford, the Chinese inter-
prefer. is In trouble again. He has
been cited to appear Thursday morn
ing before Judge Robinson to show
cause why he should not he punished
for contempt. Crawford was sued By
his wife for divorce and on October 29
she was granted alimony In the sum
of $40 per month and an attorneys fee
OF SIS. Willie had paid neither sum
as yet and yesterday ]. NJ. vivas, at
affidavit setting out these facts and
asking for the contempt citation, which
was granted.
The appraisers of the f. w. McChes-
ney estate filed an inventory and ap-
praisement yesterday showing the only
assets to be 1S9 shares OF McChesney
& Sons Co., Ltd. stock appraised at
s9,450. Thirty snares of Honolulu Soap
Work Co., Ltd. are listed as "of no
value as they are pledged to the First
National Bank OF Hawaii who are
about to bring foreclosure" A one
third interest in McChesney & Sons, a
partnership, is also listed as ''of
no value" while the appraisers also
find GAG shares of Kona Sugar Co., to
be "of no value"
The case OF Marconi's Wireless Tel
sgraph Company VS.. +. J. Cross, which
had been on trial for three days, re-
suited in a mistrial last evening as
soon as the impossibility OF finishing
the case before the expiration of the
term was seen. The November term
came to an end at midnight last night.
and II was necessary that everything
should be concluded before that time.
as one extension of the term had al
ready been granted.
On the question for which the plain
tiff was allowed a reopening, the evi-
dence OF N. C. Lilley and d. w. An
derson cleared up the British corpor-
ation law. They testified that they
had been barristers in Scotland and
were acquainted with the provisions
OF the companies act Upon this show
ing Judge Robinson denied the motion
for nonsuit
The defense began with the testi-
mony of w. X. Harrington, secretary
OF .fNe Inter-Island Telegraph Com
pany. His evidence consisted chiefly
OF the Identification of letters which
mad been sent to the Inter-lsland Com
pany by the plaintiff corporation, and
which showed recognition of the
transfer of Cross rights to the COM
pany. Several of the letters showed
also that the London company had ac-
cepted payments from the Inter-lsland
Company, and dealt with II in the
pi"1e VI 'ne uvi'''uan. y. .. iiuse"'ns'
o VI" 'eu "
tue sa"ie eheot' te'''hs vi p"! !heh's ny
u'l' W 'ne i1oiuon w, po'a.'o", II oe
he unue'S'oou 'h"I tnls was uone IA
pu' s''"iee VI al "sreeinen' us Mni'n
S'ISs wac W VI" oyel n's i'Sneniae
aIiu Ilsn's " '"e eo'pora''oi' ioriheo
'oi lha' pun pose'
Duilhs ie'ess' l"Men "ni,e ii",on-
'ne was on ,he s'anu' one VI 'he Ju'
oIs asNeu "ha' p,oouoii,,y theie Wa"
nii'sn 'ne oase oe'oie 'ne 'ein Guy,
eu, oi' III tne e,eh, ma. lhe jury uie
.'' as,e. on 'e'u''' ''ii,heuia,e'y, II
eo"'u oe Ie'"'n neu ou e"e ,oiiu"inS
uas' rur'ner u'scuSsioii ue'eiopeu
.n"' Mas ai'nos, ilnpossip'e " put III
al Vi the ueienuah' tes,iihohy oe-
"v's "hu ins.rue''onS ~ anu u,he