The Tucson citizen., 1902-04-15

Attorney Nave on the subject but he
refused to speak with them saying that
he had no authority to do so. The
jurors tira'iy decided to make the most
of Il ana the Eailiff took them to the
San Augustine Hotel, where they were
SER Cd with dinner. Manager Karnes
| gave them three rooms that connected
and placed cots and extra beds in the
| rooms to provide for the Jurors SO
that they spent the night cnmE.Itably.
The Hoey jur" arose bright and
early this morning and the members
all stated that they had slept well
notw outstanding the crowded quarters.
Some of those who have business in
terests and families In Tucson still
felt that they were being imposed up
on and that the court had no right
to lock them up before the case went
TO the jury. They seemed to think that
the court ought to trust them that far
ana did not consider that it was a
matter Of la" Others of the jury took
the whoie ane!r III good light and
thought themselves lucky to be locked
up in hotel instead of the Jury room
at the court house as has been done
in one or two cases that were tried
here in Pima County about two
years ago.
When the court opened again this
morning the case was resumed There
We're the usual number OF spectators
In the court room. Rev A. NJ. Gibbons
has been an interesting spectator of lue
trial and Superintendent Sroufe of the
railroad, was in the court room near
ly all morning The jury was called and
as all were present. the trial WIS taken
up The counsel for the defense con-
tinned the cross examination of George
Webb. Webb was stubborn witness
under cross examination and refused
to state anything that he did not know
of his own knowledge. Judge Barnes
tried to make him contradict his testi- |
mony at the preliminary hearing be- 1
fore the United States Commissioner
at NOgales. Judge Barnes reviewed al /
most all of Webb's testimony at No
ga les, asking him If he had made Ger
tam answers to the questions asked
him at that time. The counsel for the
objected to nearly every /
question and in most cases the objcc-
tons were sustained. The purpose Of
IDENTIFY 10 get the testimony at the
hearing on the record and
oefor" the jury, since the judgA would
not admit IL in this court This Ques-
ioninR took q great doal OF tome
Webb stated on being questioned
.hal ne had known John Sapuna under
lie name Of Smith. BY questioning
Webb. Judge Barnes was able 10 I'M
.rodllce the testimony in the deposition
If Sapuna TO the court although the
Judge sustained the objection Of the
aouuscl for the government and the
witness was not allowed to answer the
questions MIR. Ncmore stated in
'oUrt that the goNt rnment would OBJ
iect 10 this and other depositiOns and
he counsel for the defense took this
way Of introducing it to the jury. The
government has no way IN whi~h they
,ould rule it out Judge Barnes stated
hat ii was his purpose to show tElt
Webb was trying to make Hoey the
icapegoat and that it was to his in
crest to see him prosecuted. The gov
,rnment counsel stated that they II
ended to show that Webb exposed
Ioey for his own protection. Inc
1uestions taken from the deposition - ,
5apuna and directed TO Webb, were
evidently to make the jury believe
that Webb had engaged with Sapuna
In iliagaly importing Cinnamon.
About this time Attorney Mclemcrp
objecteu to the deposltions being in