The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1902-11-29

.1ew before N" ni'eun D'''''
Sn,e' o'o Or "'''' ''''"'
M, rigLt. are under the protect ion Of
nv counsel have 40 criticism to make
:" my suit'iHs ,ais,. all ,l,, NJ, NJ,
irieha, m me ~, 90 ~, H., az -.
tempt would TO inade TO-DAY ny ms c"ul-
eel NJ Delaney, TO "rta,u ah ord'r from
..e SUI ~, ronr,iss,nr.r Stureis'. order
BUSTING me h'"' on ~. @ 'n,
disclosed
- ro,,r,,. Am rxIrs, COUNSEL SAYS
$1,000, ,,,de Ly Noyor
Low, Mr. Delaney said
n. statement of IN, Mayor wa a r@"d
,'c pn, IL .,lnurdii.ate has done
II, ~ IN lt.niI,l , : q. ur"viou~ .ttt"'u'ut~
%, ,hc nh ~ I'D '--,h. l-lo. ~" fl,t wa
n. t,is. To- ~, H.. -, rrn. oed,nr cNculpu'orv
by intims,ing that good viii com" out Of ~.
'ny dss'' a." 90 Lesi,je,ur' TO make ,hnngc> in
me Charter - that -" iir" commissioner
.bau Le MT, rn,r.ll.I los -1Irc, tiuu or
ymcorr,nondatinr iron. tho , r.f
In other word. ~om" roiiticu appoi'c"
.h,n 20 into he Orioc. appoint a 'hil al
~. own kidn"y instead OF tnn H''' ,p pn"H th,n
run the department To -ut himself Ih"
trehshter become n,"r", "Iu"h1asI Y"
,he Comml--l"n"i -" 81 N,m ',nnto,
W. h'''' wv
Wr Low Disclose ia. r"al reason e th"
,t.ark on Chief croker that COMMISSIONER
S,urg- cannot l~-,yu and GRO. not" whom !''
Ike. without cou-uitins n" thl"i OF ne de-
nsrtms,t and the ~ icc- must h" allied by
n s'qrti-,- srYoin'%n'- T. = rt% &C.,, igr
'h1, this trll proves mat - change NJ the
fo1r,or !. necessary -ufAIt the tuuui~- lou"r
viii no, hi,c to iormu',t, prepare and try
Nv tie charge
rhi, - nor 80 CouuI--. "n'r Stnsi-,
tYder the ,hsrt,r. could have permitted
he Deputy con. r.i-.i"u'r7o rE the CHARGE
We Ia.-@d that p"Ini 80 No h"rinntnr "i NE
ri. aGd he - 'I n" ",, ono TO r, %' r !%2T m.
rudirg- Witnuuf aIy1''t;irg that >turgI-
ms triod 10 hrirs "ardld ludsrn'n +" tL"
On raad&s rEa, a,id"rsc any one would CONC
GER. NJ -.hooI,"y would ayr. with such
. statement b" trial wa traNtsty Of
tustIc" ~ "iIri ~" toWUi->iou'r MADE MN
sell rldi,ulcu- r..rr.irs rru-"if TO let IL
'nprop:r t".umnEy or to keen o,t urol'r
tes'lmohr. 20 long - II "oH'" !" huHlm to
The uevsparermen arg an intelligent body,
aud not on" OF those Tho VT" present ,Nlll
"a II, strry. bail on ticn.,ourdif'g nre-
,chss 70 cover IT," dishonesty OF III" "ntr"
e. ,, ,,,.,,,..,, .r,,,,
"'-s""> WI
Accompanies commissioner urgle'-
;; 49, C,,,-i.; ,p,.o,,s 4, >
SiNns 'i'. I'm, H - NJ '''''7 '
The first cidrg" alleges q talliir" 10 stie-
guard TIE Psrk hv'nue Hotel HE statutes;
'hA Department rules aud regulations clearly
define the measures Nat shall /" taken Ia
sgfeglaId such bUIldIigS which measures
include staudripeS, hos". Sc. n buildings
over 100 feet or oi min" stori">. rh" PARK
also rec ire -cmi-srnual INSPECTIONS 1h,-,'
measures were not taken nor were ~. il %
sneetiorls mad
In tie two aud "a half veGrs during which the
defendant exercised the powers Of Cticf OF
Department hefor, the FIRE. no onort vas
made bv him to enforce The Necessary ire
cautions il was hi, duty 10 ,utorc,. them
Nhy was il not done ON oct :. 1899 10
issued IN order suspend NC all irspr,,iort e,
cent whare M. sno,ild Srr''ifloaiIv ordrr No
never thereafter ordered an ir.pr, ion OF
tits building WHY rot' Tie d.l.noc tr.,
alleges that il was fr"I roof liz. statute
ihahcs no su'iI rNi,i'io,ur huI N"e u I.t' %
tepGsnt RI XIX II" ,cstiticd under o,,I be-
fore the ,oroner's rurv IN March that he did
not consider it froproof aud gave ts ii,
in lis corstruction He therefore knows i, :
cous,rtlctiou and MS present contradiction
cannot ha nc,.nted
torLD HAVE SAVED PARK AVtNtE LIVES.
The dsfencf iar,h"r sll"ssd rn. oEdrr, o!
70 SHIFT tn. re- possibility wa not sustained
The ex Commit. ,ionrr was not called a. a VII
ness bv the defendant. and 10 eIcu-" wa
nondrrauc. of evidence -howed that tho ~ oct
ms at which such order wa alleged TO have
one wear sitcr Tho order OF th., dcicudl,t ,,a-
issued Further that nothing uIuroachiuc
such an order Wa given at aid meeting but
that the talk referred 10 "A change OF form M
Violation no,irc- r,uur-tpl nv tho , orrora.
ZION Counsel TO .nnhin hin tho better to- mos.
,ute his case. Furth,r tho defendant -t,t,d
that he personally CONFUSED the order of ispG
himself li-t- of other inspect ions wor.
rlac.d in evidence hut they Included no nr-
class hotpl-
n i unnrcr--ar,' 20 -pek the mot i've for ,ha-.
syomntion- The fatal result IN tho case nj
II, Pm Avenue Hotel l. Known and II cuuno'
bc ,ioultpd from the evidence that II Will
known reguIr.ruclt. had been com,lird Wit
no snch caLfuitv would have occurred IN,
existence Of y ~tlud-uipa and lines Of hose n
the hotel wouli have -avri many live and
ierhnps All of those that v"rr lost No sufficient
or valid rst~on j. given IN thi. cg-o Tor ~,
violation OF Ian rtln and re- -ulttiou The
finding j. guilty
- ,.....,..-. ..,,.
'"' '',' '''' 49, ''''''''
10" S"cohd 9, ."IH' ill"t' neon I"th'N al
Gr,h IreN lIt'' uUur't.,Io i.S ar, gwen.
-, W" WIZ VI, ~ Ir.N-"St ~lr''l hho
fIrsI a'tu". ''i' ,H'Iu" "l Ih" Phic %
,'nt,rS hfouin lu' "htN9nnNi o. certain
honihig- on lNTiH -N','ih ,sltr' htN''
mt aN'hu" 'nd ~" iH-l ilN'r, ana tl"n
conseuutit d,N'rl'iIor ara tIrad OF tr'
ron from. p" i''pNiN thl'i ana the Rot
talon 'hwi ig'''l -" ir" ~ 'oN" build
lngS say th"N '"lh nave hrld me ground
Inc ,d.iehdaht. th'r superior otic'r d"
oid"d LAT th't ,NlI i"t ald rG'r'd tA"n