The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1902-02-06
MOVES WAS DISCUSSED
McCumber Declared He Knew Charges
Against Hin We're False.
SENATOR TLLMAN IN A NEW ROLE
He Defended the Federal Judiciary
Oa Not Want His Remarks Under
stood as Personal.

Washington, February 5.-Ihroughout the
days session tho senate had under consld.
Grafton the urgrnt deficiency onpronrlntion
'"' 's'"1 ''''' ''"'' "Pp''t" "''0''
o'il' ana Just before adjourumeut passed lt
substantially in the shape in which IL was
rcported to tbc sepntc ny tho ,,6tntufttrr
The coso NJ Jpdco Arth,t II Moves of
'"'e VI 'u"he Ht'Nu' H. Nu' ~ "'
| the district court of Alaska and Alex Nc
Keuzie and otbers was discussed Mr.. Nc
C,,mhcr IN M aotIroroa an o,,l,r.,,,
w. =" NV''V''N ~" '''"''"''
! speech In defense OF Judge Noyes ANA Nc
! KeuzIe Incidentally Nc criticised tho cir.
! co,t ,.,,,rt az ,,,oa,i. 30 Co, ,,.,r.fs,, a..
! 1u't SVu'' OF uPpeo'S Oh oan rthh'lS'o 'oE
| permitting Itself 20 b, influenced by rvcju-
! dico and bias. He beeame involved In %
coloouy with Mr. riun,,r ,,h, s,t1 t.
'H'' "''H 'i'' I"'ulah' W"u s9lH ne
/ "Ppe@''N 'h thc mover attitude of defend
er ct the United States judiciary Inn
South ,,r,It,,, .,,,...... ...
INN s'N"'"i Pul INTO Tue Con
court OF nppcgls of san Fro,.t.c, a., r,,
euscs or c6htcmpt against NV. 1nJ Iic
htnzle "' '
MIR Stov,art sn.p., +,,..,. t-,
Judge Nnvcs Ina r. s.ousF hgalhsl
Al fhc copclnsinn ',H I ,,e,t, im N!h1N''
sldCrot,or U-a ,u',om va 5"u,iue business con
Hpionry ar, "nS tvstu,u',' or 'hc urgent or
t"tP'"l,t'"ti"h ulE
made nm IAN" a', IN c2aCse OK the measure,
Lin ~" "pl'u' 10 tue senate 10 permit me
,'sc,, ~ come 70 = N'lE iie hoped the
~. ''''' 'NA' NA'u tue progress OK
'N measure,
Mr. McCumhor O.. ID said most villain
GUS charges had been made against men
VnalEes which no personally knew 10 he
absolutely false lie declared that certain
mining syudicatcs had desired 10 obtain
control OF the whole Nome Anskg conn.
try He believed II would bn nrptnsture
for the senate to render a verdict rgr or
against Judge Arthur N Noves nnd Al.
an,er Mckenzie before Tho ronrts bnd on.
pOrtunlty to pnss uppn thn merits ~ tbe
case lie ventured the oniinon tbot the
grnntor fron, ss,,sh ' r, "P',,inVn lIInn,Htt lHV
wnuIh rnt -, VaI tTai"uua VI Iuuhl
McEen9io ma 'u"uu0 suS 'un'ke usahSi
mNior Win "a. 49, ~ hHI ucSn ~
no perSon eo,,iI my nrgo v uGC,areu tugt
G,stn,,,e" ,Uu.u PVl nhger upon u single
J I"Stnn's Where A,cxander MChcr2ic or
oufsN 49, tNel lHu WtonGeh any mAh
was M Sviii",, nnH nc asSytleu mat there
auder NcI<Grgie'a ner+ '"'P""'' u" A'sN'
Mr. NoT ,nS,v PapI .,.,,.., 49,.
~ hV@ lhpet then entered upon an eXt
iEen n9et statement OF the case against Nc
mnintot,hS ''k InIo hl1ule delaHS, lc
eiS6utt o. Sppeals az san Francisco went out
,' orSd,i ,nc NSS'ytltmeuts OF tact made 10 it
az N6irh + nS tNSu Nv 70 luln over property
The ,nc,nSo, M" =, 'p t, rccviNel'.
~ Nt1'n t'rSult mlE1t ue honorable mei,
bv tboi. "ut NC MAS onHeea 70 indge them
Jnasn ~ my Nourt hRu convicted
AL s. a 80 80. NullS " was -VNN hHeS away
Iuu nau arrhlGheu MN IN most remarkable |
nA""Ae """"ut any opportunity or near |
Mr. Nrc,,r,,h,r ,o,,..a an. AZ,
Mtr umuef declared that the mining !
G9SItute'lts mao mRIc every EFFORT to hrihe !
in nne 800, tst,'.,iO tneihk uuNlsu 70 Nun |
bi,S ~, ,nut'''k ~ luipnsS'p.C 70 hrlpe I
asserted n man n, U,'i" ~, ~ VluIrF |
dayit tbof I fc 80 nose ,peIlureu an, ,
portcd 70 tbS af,nr,, nc ssa,e3' nag h2,en re-
States srh ~, utl,s LvhV ~ o' we hlted
the denprtment ~ Justice M t'rost bs !