The Scranton tribune. [volume] (Scranton, Pa.) 1891-1910, 1902-06-17
Arguments IN
MANY CASES
HEARD YESTERDAY BY THE
THREE LOCAL JUDGES.
This Is the Last Week of Court Be-
fore the Summer vacation-Man-
ner in Which the Cases on the
Argument List for This Week
Were Disposed OLA. r. Hamlet
Can't Pay Alimony Because He Is
on Strike-Marriage Licenses and
Other Court Notes.

This Is the last week of court before
the summer vacation and Is devoted to
the consideration of the argument list,
the three Judges being OH the, bench.
The following cases on the common
pleas list were argued yesterday: John
s. jenkins against the Rushbrook Coal
company. exceptions to report OF ref
cree; c. NJ. Little against w. G.. Doud.
exceptions to rule for judgment: Mary
Ann Ryan against. Delaware, Lacka-
wanna and Western Mutual Aid asso-
citation. rule to strike off non-6uit: Ed
ward Thompson company against II.
II. Holgate. demurrer: r. L. Billings
against Clark's Summit Manufacturing
company, exceptions to affidavit of de-
fcnse and rule for judgment. Other
cases considered were: .s..
Continued-Joseph j. Jernyn against
John O. Stanton rule to open judgment.
city of Scranton against d. p. Thomas
estate: rule to strike off judgment: j. o.
Ackerman against G.. w. Hornbaker. cx-
Ceptions to report of referee NJ d. Brown
e. Company against Mary A. Sweeney.
cyecutrix: rule for new trial. Kennedy G.
Naloney against James Sweeney: rule to
sell certain property. Elizabeth Werm
against Richard Wermn: rule for decree
in divorce City Of Scranton against
against Joseph Osowski: rule for decree in
divorce. German Building association,
No. .. against p. McAndrew and others:
rule to open Judgment. Commonwealth Of
Pennsylvania against Cassie Sampson,
ccr,iorari NJ. c. Anslcy against E. p.
Carly and others; rule to strike off lien.
Celia u. Tiffany against L. A. Tiffany:
rule for decree in divorce. j. w. Guern-
sey against Lackawanna Silk company:
rule to open judgment Andrew Sedlok
against George Remenyeski: rule to open
Judgment. Phoebe j. Kennon against
benjamin Kennon: rule for decree in di-
vorce. Kalamazoo Wagon company
against A. r. Gould & Son: rule for Sc
curty for costs. Pennsylvania Central
Frewing company against Peter Lipo-
vIcz.
Rules Absolute-J. w. Guernsey against
city of Scranton: exceptions to report of
referee: Rochester Chemical company
against W. H. Coon company. limited:
rule to file amended statement. Lewis
Knitting company against B. Harris &
company: rule for security for costs.
OFF I.ist-Patrick Golden against Mar
garet Lyons; rule to open judgment p.
j. Whalen against jewelers. and Traders
Life Insurance company: rule to set aside
service of summons. F. l.. Peck and
others against county commissioners Of
I.ack;,wanna county: appeal from assess
ment JOHN c. Miller. executor. against
John T.. Beamish and others; rule to re-
duce collection fee. Lizzie Gallagher
against the Republic Savings and Loan
association: rule to dissolve attachment.
Peter j. Gallagher against Alexander
Gross; rule to open judgment. Friedman
e. IIerkovitz against NJ. D. Breschel rule
for security for costs. A. Cameron against
G. Graye and others. equity: exceptions
to bali: Mountain Lake Land and Coal
cornpany against James NJ. Murray;
equity. Mary Firestein against E. Freed
man. certiorari.
Rules Dischargcd-M. II. Winchel.
bearer, against W. II. Stevens: rule to
open Judgment Oswald Jones against p.
+. Schuster; rule to dissolve attachment.
Josephine McNulty against c. A. Beemer;
rule for set off.
S,ibmitted-Arabella d. Fnsline against
EGos Ensline; rule for decree in divorce.
Eert A. Foote against NJ. Belle Foote;
rule for decree in divorce.
Exceptions to the report of the referee
were withdrawn in the case of Mary
Dickson against the City of Scranton,
and the report of the referee was con-
firmed. Judgments for the defendants
were allowed in the cases of the City Of
Carbondale against John Clune and
Mary Barrett. The exceptions ito the
report of the referee In the case OF
George Spitz against Steve Dufallo
were dismissed by agreement, the re-
port confirmed and judgment accord
dnglX.
When the rule for aimony in the
divorce case of A. II. Hamlet against
Dorothy A. Hamf1et was called. Attor-
ney John r. Jones, who appeared for
Mr.. Hamlet, said that his client has
been working in the mine as a company
hand and is not now employed, and
therefore unable to earn anything. He
said even when working his pay is not
sufficient to enable him to pay much as
alimony or counsel fees. The last
month he worked he earned only $25.
Mr.. Jones asked that the matter be
held in allegiance until the strike is over.
Yesterdays Marriage Licenses.
Martin j. Walsh ..................D Dunmore
I >lfh Mnrc I, =