Waterbury Democrat., 1902-01-14
CITY ATTORNEYS REPORT.
List of Cases Now Pending Against
 the City.

or the city attorney, submitted to the aldermen last night:
 Waterbury, Dec 15, 1901. ITO the Hon Edward G. Kilduff,
 Mayor of City of Waterbury s'Sir:-
 Pursuant to the provisions of the charter of this city, requiring the city attorney to make q written report of his doings for the year ending on the Both day of November, I would re- spectfully report that the following is list of cases returned to the various courts of this state since the date of my last report of December 15, 1900, in which the city of Waterbury is either party plaintiff or defendant
 District Court of Waterbury. Charles A. Baldwin vs City of Wa terbury.
 Robert somers ys City of Water bury.
 Wilbur c. Austin vs City of Wa terbury.
 Frank Korner vs City of Water bury
 "cordelia .. o'Neill ys City of Wa terbury.
 Richard Lynch ct tx vs City of Waterbury. L
 Herbert F. Camp vs City of Water bury.
 70. J. Griggs ct al ys City of Water bury.
 70. J. Griggs ct al vs City of Water bury.
 Annie L. Griffin vs City of Water bury.
 "Dominico Manifredi, administrator, vs City of Waterbury, Tn addition to the foregoing cases there is also pending before the board of railroad commissioners of this state the appeal of The Connecticut Rail- way and Lighting Go, appealing from the conditions imposed by the city up- on the application of the said company to lay certain turnOuts on North Main street 1 Il would also report that during the ! past year the following cases pending in various courts have been disposed of either by trial, settlement or dis continuance:
 District Court of Waterbury. T. Perley Smith ys City of Water bury
 Patrick McGovern vs City of Wa terbury.
 '.Thomas Kelly, ys City of Water bury, three cases.
 James W. Cone vs City of Water bury, three cases. l @. L. Dexter < Go vs City of Wa terbury, three cases.
 "Lucien Pratte vs City of Water bury.
 Morris H. Waas vs City of Water bury.
 Walter H. Cook vs City of Water bury.
 "E. F. Cole vs City of Waterbury. William M. Carter vs City of Wa terbury
 Leo Klug ct al vs City of Water bury
 Charles F. Carswell vs City of Wa terbury
 ''John Malley vs City of Waterbury. John Wurtzinger ys City of Water bury.
 ..John Sachenhauser ys City of Wa terbury.
 Wilbur c. Austin ys City of Wa terbury.
 Superior Court
 "John Clohessey ys City of Water bury.
 Thomas Kelly vs City of Water bury ct al.
 .The cases of Matthew Colwell ys City of Waterbury and Henry Make peace ct ux ys City of Waterbury have both been tried in the superior court during the past year and are now pending in the supreme court.
 s.The case of the City of Waterbury vs Connecticut Railway and Lighting Go brought to the superior court praying for all injunction to restrain the Connecticut Railway and Lighting Go from continuing to maintain Its tracks upon the Watertown road, has also been practically disposed of dur ing the past year, and will be formally withdrawn as soon as the work, now i'll progress, of widening West MaIl street, is completed.
 During the first four months ol 1901 the time of your city attorney was almost entirely taken in the pre- paration of matters before the ger s'a assembly. and upon various hearings before committees of that body. Fina nassa ge. and approval of acts affecting the interests of the city was secured as follows:
 "An act concerning bonds for city officials and sinking funds for pnbli> improvements: government of toWr
  l Bronson library fund; acts authorizing the city to issue consolidated fundine bonds; school bonds; sewerage bonds storm water drainage honds; water bonds; water meter bonds.
 Tn addition to time spent as above the city attorney has been in constant consultation with the board of alder men and other members of this city and has rendered many written anS oral opinions upon various subjects.
 -Four thousand one hundred anf eighty-four dollars and forty cents ot old city assessments have also bee collected and paid over 10 the treasur CT of the city during the period GOV cred by this report. Respectfully.
 ..JOHN F. KELLOGG.
 "City Attorney
 The report was accepted and or dered printed in the year book.
 Dr. hrause Indicted.