Waterbury Democrat., 1902-07-03
SC0V|lL co S2, 900 SUIT.
Begun To-day in District Court
 Before Judge CoWell.

Three Petitions for Divorce Were Filed
 To-day-Will Be Heard at September
 Term of Court-Papers in the Suit of
 Norviss- Bronson Were served To
 day.
 The long pending suit of the Scovin Manufacturing Go vs the Bons1late Box Go of Hartford for S2,OOO dam ages, began to-day in the district court before Judge Cowell. Burpee and Car mody appeared for the plaintiff and Judge Henry of Hartford for the de- fendant. A bill of particulars showed that $1,600 worth of goods was the issue. The plaintiff claimed that the goods were delivered as ordered, While the defendant maintains that they were not delivered on time and were practl- cally valueless when they did come. William A. Cook said he was the sales, man for the plaintiff at the time and IS now president of the National Bedsteau Go, New York concern. He sold the goods to the defendant and sent in their order A mass of correspondence which passed between the litigants was introduced. showing there was a con- troversy between them over the goods in question. To-day is the last day of the term of the court, but on account of this case it may remain open for two or three days. Before taking up this case Judge Cowell handed down few decisions. In the case of J. F. Smith & Go yS A. l.. Peck x Go, a suit of replevin, judgment was granted the plaintiff for S1 and costs and to re- cover the goods, about $500 worth of lumber
 The decision of the city court was affirmed in the case of Vincenzo Rocco vs Aneillio Rousso, in which the costs of a steerage ticket to Italy was the issue. The city court gave judgment for the plaintiff to recover his money, deducting the agents commission. The amount was $2S.50.
 Attorney M. J. Byrne appeared in q motion for default and Judgment in the suit of Kellogg & Rose vs Attorney E. F. Cole. The court ordered continu- ance until the September term, the de- fendant being on a cruise with the New Haven Yacht club, of which he is the commodore.
 The number of divorces for hearing in the September term of the superior
 
 added to the list. They were filed with in few minutes of each other. The first was Annie F. Smith of this city against Herman G. Smith. The plain tiff is represented by Senator Kennedy. Cruelty is alleged The patries were married September 23, 1898. Mrs Smith petitions for the restoration of her maiden name, Richards. The second was jennie K. Latham against H. Latham. Statutory grounds is the basis of this suit On October 24, 1890. the plaintiff and the defend- ant were marrled. As in the first case, the plaintiff seeks the restoration of her maiden name, Neale. Her counsel is Attorney Bradstreet.
 Mrs Winifred Dundas also asks for her maiden name, Hilton. She was married on September 21, 1889. to John son Dundas, whom she had before Judge Burpee in the city court few weeks ago charged with assault She alleges that for the past ten years her husband has been habitually intemper- ate and intolerably cruel Tn the city court case she testified t11at some time ago. while living in Ansonia,, she was stabbed by her husband Dundas laid all the trouble to his mother-in-law. Attorney Carmody represents Mrs vun- l das
 1 The papers in the suit of Joseph Nor viss against his former foreman. Alon- 70 Bronson, employed by the Water bury Brass Go, have been served. Nor viss claims S2,00O for assault. in which he says he was knocked down. his clothes were torn and one of his back teeth broken. This case has already been related in the Democrat Senator 1 Kennedy represents the plaintiff The case is returnable to the superior court. September term.