The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1902-11-19
HIGHER COURTS RECORD.
SUPREME COURT

Ael<Nhl SOoi
1897. Johns VS.. State of Indiana. Frank
lin c. c. Reversed. Gillett, jim a prosecu-
ton. under Section 217S, Burns 1901, for
fraud is essential TO the offense, and the
facts constituting fraud and duress must
be specially pleaded.
Motion to set aside dismissed and to REIN
state overruled.
1882. Elk rel. Ross VS.. Anderson. Randolph
c. c. Transferred to Appellate Court.
Minutes
1922. Bette F. Nichols. ADMINISTRATIVE,
VS.. the b. & o. s. w. Ry. Co. Lawrence
c. C. Appellee's brief (S.)
1892. p, c., c. & st. l.. R.. r.. Co VS.. the
Town of Wolcott. White c. c. Appellants
petition for oral argument. Appellants
1892. Joseph A. Wait ct al. VS.. Harriet
Westfall. Marion c. C. Appellee's petition
for additional time.
NJ. G. Walls ct al. Putnam c. c. APP
p~ellants' petition to advance. etc.
APPELLATE COURT.
1898. w. u. Telegraph Company VS.. Kreie-
ger. Laporte s. c. Petition TO appeal TO Su-
preme Court denied.
4013. Halter VS.. Gibson. Allen c.. c.. At
firmed. Robinson, J.-Where evidence is not
material and is harmless. under the issues.
a new trial will not be granted on account
thereof.
1852. International, etc, Association VS..
Board of Commissioners: Marion c. c. Az
firmed. Wiley, c. il. The County Board
of Review has authority to equalize valua-
tons made by assessors. 2. Where a secre-
tary has full authority TO act for a corpo-
ration as an executive officer. and volun-
tarily appears before a board of review
upon its request, and submits TO an exami-
nation as TO the values of the stock of the
corporation. he valves for the corporation
any defect In the notice TO appear and gives
such board Jurisdiction Of the cor poration
3. A lawful proceeding by the board OF re-
view cannot be collaterally attacked.
4253. McAnally VS.. Glidden Knox G. &.
Reversed. Roby, il The estates OF ten
ants for terms of years are liable for i'm
provements made by them upon the de-
vfsed premises: and a lien therefor extends
TO the entire interest under the lease. but
does not affect a reversion Of the lessor
unless he. by some act of his own. has OBJ
ligated his estate. 2. When a receiver of a
coal mine has leased the mine for a term
OF years and the lessees by lsbors have
improved and greatly increased the value
OF the property, which is surrendered 10
the lessor by the lessees before their term
OF lease expires without paying the labor
ers Tor their services in improving the mine,
II Is proper for the receiver To reimburse
such laborers out of the funds I'm his hands
4iI2. c., L. * l.. Railway Company VS.
Talcutt. Clark c. c. Appellants granted If
teen days In which 10 file brief.
1870. Il. * o. Railroad Company VS.. Lau-
ter. Laporte c. c. Dismissed.
AIS. Imperial. etc, Association VS.. Thorn.
as. Clinton c. c. Reversed on confession OF
errors. Per curtain.
1910. Stembel VS.. Bell. Tippecanoe S. c
Petition TO advance overruled.
457s. Federal Oil Company VS.. Bradford
Grant s. c. Dismissed.
1915. Evans VS.. Oden. Allen c. G. Appel.
lees motion to dismiss postponed until ina
hearing.
1872. Citizens. etc. Mining Company VS.
Whipple. Adams c. c. Appellee granted ex-
tension OF time TO file brief.
1915. City OF Hammond VS.. Livingston
Lake c. c. Petition for leave to index rec
/ ord overruled.
| ASA. Kenny Company VS.. Dewart. Kos,
ciusko c. G.. Dismissed.
1862. Huston VS.. Fatka. White c. c. Ora.
| argument Dec. Is. 1902
: S624. Home, etc. Power Company vs.. Col