The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1902-11-02

of the Roman Church, authorized after being
reformed, by the Council Of Trent, Estu-
shin must be similar to that OF the Roman
Church. SO it was intended 20 be by the com
pliers of the prayer book, Arch6ishop, Gran
except in parishes where the fun expression
wne repress~d by persons IN power who wished
to sPe;s In our Gay SsTsy and r..ore
the fun expression. by ornaments. cere-
monies and teaching. as their iorernnnerIi;
The s do"trne brought by restored ceremonies
into prominence IL right there IN the PRAYER
book Hence the doctrine being Ia,,, a author,
Be il rene INBRED. furthermore. that neither
the Church Of ENGLAND nor the EpissopS I
,Sn sAn e smnhSsnes on the con 81
the plain .rubric Of the PRAYER book Of the
Church OF England commands the use OF
necessarily means that they shall symbolic
what they always have synboized in its
6 SS d 4SsIc As sna S Sc other M
niacHnce as TO lighted candles, priestly vest
msn, &c Than ths tr'ff,STs, ehn2HS
he "f Roman m church Would il be crime or
misde peanor' Ept''SpsIian . ~,i.Srs OF
the wording of the Roman mass contains
no,hin Objectionable TO any, intelgent
p,copalian and ,he cs sftice "' mn "'n
quote the Hrst English PRAYER book. was
commended IN its present form ~ the time
OF Eliza beth by the Roman pontin OF that
should the Roman. and the English rituals
9 kseps me- cha 92 @ apart Iced
the House Of Bishops has taken steps toward
recognizine. In inter-,ommqhRio1; ihe man,
Polish Catholic Church in America. In which
the Roman mass j. preserved intact, IN form,
manning and frremon rS " "SGGem LOT IT, re en-
people
hut ned that alarm Or perpsx anybody?
Certainly, the EpisG22pa!ans YIN no. Up in
arms arms about What might MIGHT make them ben,
tha, several Methodist churches have d,p,ed
the High Church" style Of worship almost
&c. sSrv s r"n n,s r With aid oia
crosses. and mir7bllc di~ul high mass in
En s!ish. Including III" hs1"dictns and Asnass
Two better 50 FAY a; have learned cisco.
these appro xImations rs steps toward unity.
and they arS willing to take al hsipiul meas
br,s FOR ,fn rm the
Catholic ceremopinl IN the Episccopal Church
tends toward the unity that viii be accom-.
sSrrsd whssr ike
or not In land OF 5000 oo, where not
quarter Of ,he pe9,gy cS,oHs . TO any
be- plenty 81 elbow room for both Churches.
with lot OF unoccupied space for Protestant
ism to live or de in
Las, OF all, l. would make 70 difference TO
the ri ne %HtStorS Of Tsn,Hres
opinion. in .,r'icles Ct religion. sermons,
books of controversy, and the like The
BOOK Of Common Prayer remained apart
through all the tumnlt, rs repository OF
Catholic doctrine Were Il not SO. the "rltu-
nlis's" would repudIate. that order OF worship
and prepare one Of their own IN harmony
with their beliefs The prayer book is not
an inspired book, in the sense Of the term as
applied by Catholics 70 Holy Scripture, and
the "ri,uallstic' movement to set forth
prayer book suited to their needs as II was
for Crnnmer or ANYBODY else. II NOT. why
nott The "ritualists' are terribly in earnest,
b. cause they believe their cause is inst; and
had they to choose bet wosn standing by their
faith and embracing even prayer books Of
their deciso on They have. however, tho
prayer book with thom, as the Reformed
Churchmen well realize and this support.
has we'll nigh converted the whole constit.
ueney OF the Episcopal Church to s-raral