Omaha daily bee., 1902-10-11

Lincoln and one Of his former priests. Rev.
J. l. Harrington OF Orleans. II IL one Of
the series OF sensational troubles that have
agitated the diocese Of Lincoln for years.
bitter controversies between the bishop and
certain Of his c~lergymen. on the 18th Of
April, 1895. Father Harrington came to Ne
braska and was received into the diocese
BY Bishop Bonacum. There is contention
as to Just what status was conferred upon
him, whether he was received as a guest
or on probation or permanently, but in the
formal document drawn up the bishop re-
served the right to remove Father Harring-
ten at any time within i've years II not sat-
isned Will him. Later he gave him letters
and sent him to raise money for the cree
tion Of a church at Orleans. Father Har-
rlngton went east and raised a considera-
Bile sum Of money. 1t has been claimed,
among his own relatives and friends. II
was sometime in 1899 that a controversy
arose between him and the bishop. A church
had been erected at Orleans and the bishop
had reached a conclusion that Father Har-
rington had in his possession a large sum
Of money. He sought to secure possession
Of 1t, as he says, to place It in bank for
the benefit Of the Orleans mission. Father
Earringtcn's friends contend that the bishop
wanted to use II in the erection Of a bish-
ops house In Lincoln. The trouble re-
suited in an attempt on the part Of the
bishop to dismiss Father Harrington. The
latter refused to go and the bishop brought
suit in injunction to prevent him from en-
tering the church or using its sacred yes
sells, and Appearances, having
meantime appointed another priest. Judge
e. L. Adams dismissed the bishops appli-
ooffon hat tho o4nror,n norfrf ravaruae hfa
findings, holding that It is not the province
Of the courts to interfere in matter OF
church government and discipline.
In the Supreme Court.
Below will be found a list Of cases that
will be called for hearing October q, 1902:
Reiss against Argubright, Lancaster
Lansing against Commercial Union AS
against Milwaukee Mechanics Insurance
Company, lancaster; Lancaster Count
Union Pacihc Railway Company against
Howard County, Howard; Union Pacific
Railway Company against Roeser, Hall
Dakota County against Borowsky, Dakota;
Dakota County against Eastcott, Dakota
Van Duzer against Mellinger, Kearncy;
Pierce against Reed, Dakota; Read against
Valley land and Cattle Company, Lincoln
Martens against Pittock, Stanton; Stahnka
Der Company against Bixby. Nuckois;
Moss against Fairbury, Jefferson; BROWNE
against B%rubaker, Douglas; Ittner Brick
against Dutch. Saline; schreck against
Hanlon. Clay: Hackney against Hargreaves
Bros, Lancaster; Curtis against South
Walker, Cass; Clarke against Omaha,
Douglas; Wardens and Vestrymen st
Barnabas' Parish against Omaha, Douglas.
against Suing, CEDAR Taylor against
pany against Buckley. Adams; Iowa Loar
and Trust Company against Nehler. Sher.
man; Michigan Trust Company against RED
Cloud, Webster; richards against Radke
Anderson against Sarver, Lancaster; Adam:
against Grand Lodge Ancient Order OF
United Workmen. Douglas; Shull against
Douglas; Kitchen against Omaha. Douglas
Dale against Omaha, Douglas; Breaker
Bly,. Sherman; Temple against Carlson
Phelps; Burke against Tewksbury, Doug
las; Etter against South Omaha, Douglas
Fidelity Mutual Fire Insurance Compan,
against Lowe. JeffersOn; Lau against Lind
say. Lancaster; Hendricks Tkainst Ere
Company. Saunders; Union Life Insurance.
Company against Parker, Douglas; Barbe
egainst KTSg; Dousl2Rsi 0,naha sgaiinss
Boyer, Madison; Jackson against McNatt
Otoe: Easton against Lindegod. Dakota
Douglas; Ritter against Myers. Douglas
State Bank of Ceresco against Belk, Ian
caster; Guthrie against Treat, Nuckolls
Mertens against Bee Publishing Company
Douglas; Anderson against Kannow. Cedar
German Mutual Fire Insurance Compan
against Palmer. Frontiers; Agrew agains
Omaha National Bank. Qougias; Seyfe
against Otoe County, Otoel First Natione
Bank of Pawnee against Wishard,. Pawnee
STATE state, af pousia5 EOr PS;el PsWes oain Fsed ra aEnins
Mutual, Insurance Company against John
son, Pse eboo, n Me ( 8 against ain cd STATE
aVainSt KOuntZa Bros. Adams.