The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1902-07-15

S-er~tarv. real q ns~.saEe frots his father
In shich tho S-rFvtaFy a.ksi him - say
hnS greatly di-apt-Hni-l b. ss- that t~-
rau-. " ht- t~rct,i-ut be- cuald nnt II. pf---ut
a. Thee us.'ing to ssl'uu1- W. halfpur 'o
tho l.ai-fship Tho tulunial Secretary
a-ks,I bi- -un 30 rxpr--- shat great pr,i.
ami pl~a-urs ~ Nuuld give ham to render all
90. l-sl.t u,r iu ht- povrr
LIBERALS oNEEr rHE NEW rEEsiEA
Nh.n Mr. Balfuur -nt-r-i the lIol-- OF
Common. thus afternoon h. VA r-r-i,ed
With un,ound-d cor,lialitv A. son a. 10
wa- seated SIR Henry Campbell Rann-t-
man. IA" lAh"ral leader. arp-e and asked
PERMISSION on his own hehalf and Of thos.
acting with him To- urcr his warm.s, con.
gri,ulat ,nn- To IN. new Premier SIR
Henry ~aid he wished Nr. Ralfour sucr--s
anal prosperity. not only IN IA" formation
but in IA" conduct NJ hl- admini-t ration.
In reply, Mr. Balfour assured the Hou--
that u Sas not easv tn express IA adequate
terms his SENS" of appreciation II il kind
ne~~. SIR H-nry's worl~. he added. moved
him more than he could -ay
Rising later. Mr. Balfour referred To IN.
distinguished statesman Whose services
Wv W INV 49, NF' ~AA'N " wa W
the glory of British states nanShip that thew
never regarded party leaders otherwise
than a. representatives ~ the country
There had teen no man In this generation
WHOSE name had carried more weight
outside Great Britain. or who had rnderrd
greater services to the state. than Lord
Salisbury
Sir Henry Campbell. Bannerman. replying
g.. VEa- a - s.aI ~, aA..lN .wttf.
Mr. Balfour that the feeling he 1.-THE Premier
had oppressed was not confined tn his side
Of the Hou~' II was a -uhiec, q deep
regret tn all tina the Marquis Of Salsl ury
would no longer take part Ia the affair Il
the empire
To NJ C~HANCEILnR'
tn" g-n"ral opinion in the Hou~e ~
Commons Wa that the Right Hon william
Robert Hanbury. President uf tho Board 20
Agriculture. would sucyei sir Michael
Hicks Reach a. chancellor 81 the EN-
ch.uucr. although there j. n strong fec
ing among the I nlouists that the rcv"r-
sion should b- offered to Mr. Joseph
Chamberlain
loSDoS. July IS Mr. B~alfour', entry
into the Premiership l. watched hv the
country with n dcgr'-. 10 placid eQuantmity
that can only H. measured when u Is con-
sidcred what keen emotion would have
hen aroused had Mr. Chamberlain hsrn
chosen for the pos, The la,tor's position
even nov c1u~s~ hy far he most discussion
The belief Is Swinging up among many
~ the GoNrrnmeut supporters that No viii
l.Come Chancellor ot the t~Nchcqu-r II
l. pointed out tina, tie Colonial once -
now uas, the South African crisis. and the
conference - Colonial Prim" Ministers
could h" concluded t-fpr" sir Michael
Hick-. R'ach vacat-- his Office
The D1Iy Ndi >avs that tho public voic~
will inevitably uamr Mr.. chamberlain for
the ofGc-. lie has immen-" admiuistra'ive
capacity. N" spirit - initistiv" and an
otrn mind, witch Dos NOT adh"r" 80 a
policy merely Nrcau~" ~ u old and time
houor"d. hut which requires proof that
such A poncv j. suited 'o tho n"-,d- 81 ~.
present iaV
The Cour circular sav~ 'ha' Prms
Minister Balfnur had an audi-nc II the
King at Buckingham Palsc" at noon YES
tardsy and r",~iy"i no -aal Of ofic" a.
Lori Pnvy seal lie holds that office
wlHh a." Premiership and the leadership
81 the HOUSE 81 commons
why sALIsBrRY At MS TINE
Lord Salisbury friends asrrt- his
choice " a date for his r"~ignation to his
desire 10 rnahl" ms surC"~~nr 10 %compl"t"
| tho arrangements for III" new admIni~'ra-
| zion ipfnrr IA" Adjournment Of Parliament
on Aug 1. This would have been i'm
possible u h" had awaited VI" coronation.
ubt-h will n,,ut nf about that time