Arizona republican., 1902-05-02

rertl.- -1-f=fs. tory and convincing. as 1 far as hi uaalriaee tp Lady EIsioa was concerned. Pat on crosse, a,-at.iilla- tion Lord I-Ust1n end his father WeTe ! .orrifeG 10 find t,at smith in his turn . lad q wife living at inc time when he . ! went through tho ceremony @i mar .
 r-ae- with Eate Walsh. and that. ! therefore. tt. latter Was not legally 2 married u.lii she welded he earl Of EI~toa. The case. therefore. Was de- tet!aa tv .hr courts against the earl . and .n- ex-dar.. ..i--uoudaiue remains t3 ibis Ier his legal wife. and wheE he noble fatheg-iu-i1w 5re5Oh7s his last.
 .iI G'a-ecm .-,th as tha duchess of Graft1l
 The countess. while ehe has managed ltl keep carefully clear of anything Una,
 could a~e-I To ths eari IreteEt ior
 securing a divorce from her. HOW and
 again comes b,foi- t-e public in
 manner extremely mortif.iHG to the man whose name she bears. and to bis r.Irtf..- < year or so ago -uunE plumber ,r fae name af halle5 tilh . was arrested by the police in London , while e-.iaJvrliug to sell q pair Of | sapphire earrings and a IIlE's jWeleI watch. ja being ch@ra l with theft. 2 T. a. Jared that ,he jewels il question
 -l .l t-+ L-li-f sss- -- tri-- 'i tI- c.Iat--s fl I.ustou. Tli- latter. on being questioned by the police. denied ? lssv5ng ever sen the plumber. But on
 tha following morning. when the n.an - sta- brought beEor- the police -aagis- - t.aea. tlsa butler e. inc countess ap- 2 i-ar.3. and a aI3re5 that his mistress 2 ,..uId net aiipsIl- to prosecute tho man. ]. -~G would Il.,l,t no Charge against hfr aiding .hat tae man was per P tsc,iy rl=h, in saying that th2 jewels
 had been presented to inn by Lady q I-J5-t.n. F.. added: Her llly5 hip S has been il for a number of wears. i.- I u"t u1iLa li1lt il tho had. and often c gives away jewels to any one who a comes along. no matter whether visit a CTS or wcr.1msE employed about tn
 house.
 l. Tho fact that the countess should n tSJs be i.-re @lonsihla would ha suiii- is ,iant t3 render nar safe from any Gi- ]" rcrca court proceedings. nc matter how d much -lourI her husband might have T. for the later. as the English law doe E not admit of woman mentally irre | -ponsihle being held accountable fol ? A1r actions in the divorce court.
 10 The Guze < Grafton is of royal an l eestIv. the Erst duke having been th .i-+lt t- 1s+tt tf- A----5- AisI ~ '-- -h that Barbara Nilii=rs. who was create l- 1-- thz .-I--rria Monarch duchess c a. CIeHeIs-5I and the present dulze Dy vir -- tue o1 this descent bears the roya ~ arms 1- E-.-ia1lI. jjrzi=el' b. 2 hatG '' sinister. Thr present d,sza is 9 so!3i5
 ly profession and served With eonsi3
 o--A}c distinction j.: the C1iInean va t' s-1- tl ?. received a shot in ths c-iir = vhi- h caused his lire t5 hang il h ls hal"rc, for many Gev-. He joined in
 Iaur.hoId of Qaa-n Victoria as eouei- d Nen-n Edward ; IT was a mere hoy. au
 tae king. who has always reli him 'E high regard. has insisted oa his cor
 i tf.sia- tr form Ta-t cr the r9y' D i.ar.rrli in t. ralc cr h1no.ar D cg- .l.-. H. ,. ra,ner s-d fashioned fe lis iI-.s. ;..j som what d-sHatir wit it his tenants. iueiatiug that not oa tt every tenant. but also tha l2ttars' fan ler fl-. shaul5 attend some place of wo b1 ship regularly on sunday a'id Chris lSs mas ds-. under penalty of notice nE quit H@ Lord huston has no ctldTe
 the dulz-fg-r will eventually pass
 the now ni4et=e--y ar-cld son of I-9l 7-= Aired FitHav. uao is about to CT. ,s.. th- profession -r which his @randfathz
 ,he oIl duka. vpn sa much dis-inetio
 Mention of IrlI Euston's diEor .-~. count experiences reminds me that |
 newspapers recently contained di by patches to the effect that Lady -7ranC . g Hope 61la. Noo-l contracted ma sed riage at NoEaEama. with Major Stro' af- iun-Gi-taly on receiving news that e-r decree oi divorce mad been granted .ov jra event c6 this statement being cc -ra! .=c5. I-5dy- Francis has rendered h. ies. self guilty @. bi2a.uE. Fer the deer ,n- granted ta LorI Francis is one k@of 1.s. iu legal -,r1saelogy as ''n.si." and us is not lrtil six months la,cr. when | lea Ina tier again con before the ecu
 and the decree i= declared absolute an the il.ge, that the divorce is legal a his ec.up.= -e.
 en- Ta.= fo9-u of procedure has be s-i- -saulshad sa order l. sive time to oUs o.s-eiaI known IS the kings proctor, mo- ascertain whether there is any ( ion .tac.e t. th- divorce in the way
 'n e5ua~.au between n" petitioner a ton t-s re-.o...3en,. OF iu the case of