The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1902-11-14

The docket shows the following entries.
State use of County Commissioners VS..
Robert a. Mitchell ct al. Trial. Magma
der for plaintiff, Dallam and Rouse and
NanI}ibber for defendants.
Leonard ". Knight vs.. James Little,
administrator. Trial. VanBibber for
plaintiff Robinson for defendant
Alex. !. Hart VS.. Mary T. Backcv
Trial! Young and Penning for plaintiff,
Maynadier for defendant.
g. NJ. Lamb and Brother VS.. same.
Trial. Same counsel.
| Frank 5. Maslin VS.. Mary T. FaLelv.
Trial. Brown and Young for plaintiff,
Hopkins and Penning for defendant
Kate A. Goodwin vs.. Baltimore and
Ohio Railroad Company. Trial vii.
liams for plaintiff, VanBihbcr for defend
| ant.
State use of Chesncy VS. Philadelphia.
Wilmington and Baltimore Railroad
Company. Trial. Carver for plaintiff,
| Robinson for defendant.
| E. + .kirwan and Company vs.. Edward
NJ. Kchoe Trial. Fred. X. Williams for
plaintiff, Robert and J. J. Archer for de-
| fendant.
{. II. p Massey VS.. Bernard J. Irwin.
| Trial. Harlan and Webster for plaintiff,
Young aud I'ahcy for defendant.
Isaac ErbinsOn Company vs.. Joseph G..
! Favour. Trial Sitter for plaintiff,
/ Harlan Tor defendant.
Hartford Nutiuiial Bank VS.. Edward NJ.
! kahoc, ct al. Trial. Harlan and Web.
ster for plaintiff, J. J. and Robert Archer
and NanBibber for defendants.
Alex. +. Hayes VS.. Philadelphia, Vii
mington and Baltimore Railroad Com,
pany. Trial. J. J. Archer for plaintiff,
| Robinson for defendant.
| Andrew kinhart VS.. Republican Print,
ing Company. Trial. Carver for plain
tiff, Williams FOR defendant.
| William +. HAYS ct al. VS.. Triumph
Lodge. Trial. Williams for plaintiff,
! Harlan and Webster and NanBibber for
defendant.
Same VS.. George II. Yayish. Trial
Robinson for defcndcnt.
I Daniel p. Callahan Us. David 7. Gala
han. Trial. Henry W. Archer for plain,
! tiff.
Joseph +. Knight VS.. the Maryland
Telephone and Telegraph Company
Trial Robinson for plaintiff Preston
and Williams for defendant.
John F. Wells VS.. AIcrricll and Pcnning
ton Trial. J. J. Archer for plaintiff
Young for defendant.
William {. Bavington KS. County Com
missoners OF Hartford county. Trial
Williams for plaintiff, Maynadicr for de
fcndant.
State use of kahoe VS.. L. +. kirwan
ct al Trial. Robert and J. ]. Archer anc
VanBibber for plaintiff, Williams for dc
fendant.
Zephaniah Heaps VS.. Parker F. Scar
borough ct al. Trial. J. J. Archer ant
Young for plaintiff, fIarlani for defendant
!. Martin McNabb VS. same. Trial
Same counsel.
Rockford Manufacturing Company vs.
George ". Gordon ct al. Trial. Harlan
and Webster for plaintiff, Hopkins for
defendant.
Kate {. ilartEcll etc. vs.. the admins
traitors of Rudolph Lay. Trial. Youns
for plaintiff, Preston for defendant.
John L. Guthrie VS.. Martha Lee Smith
Trial. Williams for plaintiff, l.. Howard
Isaac for defendant
George W. Mahan vs.. Northern Contra
Railroad Company. Trial. Ensor ant
Williams for plaintiff, Carter and Roihn
son for detandanr.
Patrick McMahon Us. same. Trial
Same counsel.
William Vansant VS. William NJ. Rogers
Trial. A. Constable, Jr., and Young 10
plaintiff, ]. J. Archer and War!urtnn 10
defendant.
Harry y. Hughes VS.. MARYLAND Tele
phone Company. Agreed. Close 70
plaintiff, Preston for defendant.
. d. W. Chapman VS. Marstcller an.
Vansant. Trial. Williams for plaintiff
Edward J. Mccain vs. Sarah T. Title
Trial. :. y. and +. X. Williams for plain
| tiff, Preston for defendant.
Eliza kcllog vs.. County Commissioner
of Hartford county. Harlan for plaintiff
. Maynadicr for defendant.
Caroline II. Webster KS. George Weber
. Trial. Harlan and Webster for plaintiff
IIavrc dc Grace Electric Light Con
parry VS.. Mayor and City Council {
Havrc dc Grace. Trial. Poe, Hoppe
and Williams for plaintiff, Chamberlain
for defendant.
Mary E. GLADDEN. vs.. Maryland an
Pennsylvania Railroad Company. Tria
Robert and ]. ]. Archer forpiaintitf, Van
l Ribbcr for defendant.