The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1902-10-07

, on salary continued generally sy agree.
Sidney W. Dsppenorock Va. CITY :, no,.
s sg,, sui. ON salary; continued generaily by
s. z. Stone vs.. CITY az Eous,on 100,
on saiaryf continued generally BY agree.
Frank $ SMITH vs.. CITY az pon.,on ...,.
on salary continued generally By agree re.s
George Q. Clark VS.. cly q, uor.,or
suit suIt On salary continued generally py
Charles Jones VS.. Julia Potter q, \,
uept' continued generally By nereement
~ H. /. Rudeslli vs. Planters ana No.
'. National Bank. debt; continued
eeheIaily by agreement
j. y. McDongall rs. Mllbv 4 nov 49,.
by agreement seheiais
charles Necker vs., Galveston, Hous,on
olu ,Nossherh hallway Company, damages
cununuea generally By agreement
= ~ Stowel vs. John Priest IL A. tres.
huss 20 ny title and damages; continued
g ! Baker vs.. } 0. Davis e, al. to can.
mcut - HeIce'
9. y Baker vs. j. o. Davis CT nj. 70 en-.
W. ~, power OF attorney continued generally
| oerfN trespass TO try title and damages:
continued generally by agreement
hohert u, G. Wilson KS Gustavc Oden.
,o,ranlz sequestraton; continued generally
hy agreement
sweeney \ frederlrks VS. Philip smith d
NJ debt md foreclosure; Chester Bryan an.
pointed 70 represent as attorney Interest
| OF Defendant cited by publication.
Mary X. Buster ct al VS. frank reinnie.
ION ct al tresnass to try title and damages.
continued generally by agreement
hmma johnson VS.. Snn Antonio Hide
company. damages dismissed by plaintiff
orvllle Ewing VS.. Amanda Dunlay. debt
! and foreclosure; continued generally by
e ars,,in reset for first jury day OF De
Paul Weber and wife VS. \. j. hings
81 ~, 70 cancel deed; dismissed by plaintiff
Mrs. vi. j. Jones VS., j, q. and E.ien r.
{ Ross executors, and I. w. Moore DANA rcs,
setled and dismissed az defendants cost
charles Bartels VS.. Julia BnTteis inJunc
Ton ana damages continued generally 10y
/ agreement
Theodore Werner VS.. II. 2. Georei Of al
4 DEBT and foreclosure; continued generally
/ by agreement.
X. NJ. Lee vs. San Antonio and Arkansas
| Pass Railway Company, damages: leave ID
| tion.
Joe Rodgers vs. Texas ana New orleans
orally by agreement.
| j. Z. W. Meyer VS.. Galveston, Houston
! and Northern Railway Company, damages,
| leave 10 plalntln TO file first amended orig
! inal petition.
4 Brewer ct al vs.. Texas and New or.
| leans Railway Company damages; con,
/ tlnued generally by agreement
| Mrs. Augusta AleXius IS. Richard Aiexius,
divorce and injunctlon; continued by agree.
ment.
| Phoebe Foster VS.. Joe Foster, to set aside
| judgments leave TO plaintiff to die nrst
amended petition and bill Of review.
! Mrs. Nal :. Maynard VS. NJ. S. Maynard,
| divorce; Henry Ward appointed attorney
/ to represent defendant cited by publication.
/ Fred a, Larson VS.. Missouri. Kansas aud
/ Texas Railway Company, damages; con,
4 tinued for service,
/ ]. Manager VS.. T. H. GrIggs, debt and
| foreclosure; continued generally by ngree-
ment
Sophia Mailard VS.. August MAiliard. Of.
vorce; Otto Peitzner appointed attorney ia
4 represent defendant cited by publication.
| Fred Hoyes VS. Houston Electric Com
| pany, damages; leave to plalnun to ME
! first amended original petition.