New-York tribune., 1902-01-10
ANGERED BY Won BUELOW
LONDON JOURNAL WARMLY DENOUNCEs
THE GERMAN CHANCELLOR.

London, Jan s.-The stinging rebuke administered
~ Mr Chamberlain, the British Colonial Secretary
nv Chancellor Bulow IN the Reichstag at Ber-
~, Yesterday, a result of the formers refer
.nces IN his speech at Edinburgh, October %
last 10 the conduct Of the German Army in the
,rar with France, 1S70-'1 has caused intense and
,ridespread irritation here, and has markedly in
creased the bitterness of the Anglo-German dis
cord The 81. James's Gazette which calls Count
Won Bulow staggering Pharisee," says:
His offensive speech has brought the growing
nus sphere and the Kaiser's telegram Of six years
f3ons than the studied affront a British states
man who is trusted by the country, and. through
tolerance is no longer compatible with dignity
Of republican ministry. dependent for its life on
fcke popular opinion there would have been little
excuse for his gross perverson Of facts and breach
Of International comfy
The St. Janes's Gazette concludes with ex-
messing the belief that the "PharisaicaI imperti-
nence Of the German press is profoundly distaste-
fu to the Kaiser. who is manfulIy striving TO
the torrent which is bearing his empire toward the
Niagara OF disaster and warns Germany that
both eastward and westward OF her there is a
menace which holds her armed TO the teeth in
sleepless vigilance, and when the expected catas-
rrophe in Southeastern Europe leaves her alone
between the upper and neither milstones she may
bitterly regret the loss of the goodwill OF this
nv which she is now fnging away with both
hands"
Won BulOWS words cannot Tail 10 be nailed
throughout Europe snub TO Great Britain
saws The Pail Mall Gazette in editorial headed
The Retort Discourteous," in which regret is
n-sssed that the Chancellor. 'in his anxiety
be suspected Of being friend Of England. has
chosen TO stimulate rather than soothe the anti
British spirit"
-srhe Globe accuses Won Bulow Of deliberately
.sndering the lowest and most i'll informed ele-
ments Of public opinion in Germany adding:
1t is lnconceivable that the Chancellor spoke
.h,-s without the aDproVal of Kaiser"
The Globe then lectures Emperor William for
mot checking the stream OF foul lies and obscene
caricatures IN the German press. and referring TO
the forthcoming visit OF the Prince OF Wales TO
Germany, says:
Kaisers part 10 allow his Chancellor TO indulge in
language Intentionally offensive TO the whole Brit
sh Empire.
.srbe Westminster Gazette" alone deprecates re-
garding Count Won Bulow's speech a cause for
further disturbing the relations between Great
Britain ard Germany.
Such comments as those quoted above are bound
further 10 infame the public, already angered in
consequence Of the snub administered by Emperor
William re Few Gays ago IN tne nf t d1eTnment
in which a note appeared saying that the state
German Emperor had pressed the Prince OF Wales
attend his birthday celebration was untrue; apd
explaining that King Edward had suggested the
visit and that Emperor William had sent an IN
vitation.
Berlin. jan s-The Cologne Gazette" which
says Chancellor Won BulOWS speech N 1Ac4CIAS-
tag yesterday distinguished for its clearness,
and which suggests IL modelled after Mr..
Chamberain's own inCisive manner of speaking,
thinks the incident ought TO be regarded as
closed in the interest Of the good relations between
the two countries.
In the course OF the debate on the estimates in
the Reichstag to-day, several members welcomed
the occasion express their personal concurrence
in Chancellor Won BUloWs views OF Mr.. Chamber
Ians utterances- In behalf of the Liberal-Peoples
party. Herr Richter indOrsed the Chancellor's
served
the fact that in national questions al Germans
Of one mind
We know our army" added Herr Richter land
know what Mr.. Chamberlain IS like But
enough Of him. We have more important things
TO attend to-"