The sea coast echo. [volume] (Bay Saint Louis, Miss.) 1892-current, 1902-07-12
THE FRIAR PROBLEM.

| Al.
promptly aiter .he ARRIVAL oi
Judge lait 10 home' tnat tne
proplem invoivea IN tne purcnase
.ne ianus OF tne lria,s ~ tne
rnil,pplnes woulu oe soIvou, S anu
much praise was lavlsnco On uos- :
efnor ia!t ior ms ap'e lanollns
~ a ue,icate ihisslon' ~ y nov
Known Cua., lal iIon' ail.slnE a.
prompt setCieIiiehl, oul agon. ~
home mas nau ms nanus lu.', . anu
nus hoc yet peer, noie W sec.'le ac-
9uiescence on .lie i,aI1 VI :no a.
.lcan y auenoll.lcs IN the s'o"s VI
IouT u, uoverhii'eh1;
., ne mere s Purcnase my. Or. oi .he ANUS am.
= 'le il,ais m llaa ~. Nv. uoon n'". ~
III " tsly @ ullncul. ~. aujuS."'enT, .1'. 40
tno y, a.'ean Wa y poliooty nhs .hs
~ ~ soia AZ p..oos as.ae"Dao ~ s,: ~ p,. en
le ~ - na.aa - :. aaa,,,.;,,m .v H. ~
ls;ra,nant - % nf tba fr;ars - then,saIvas .
/ 4 stnn, ,hj;na hIocL voc reanhel r.
additinn ~ owing much nronertv
! n the ;sland the fr;ars also con.
ltrolled . nnubar ~ colIaoss nod
lotber educational establ;s5ments
lT'he nrof;tahie sale of tba;, lands
would Owe tbe fr,srs The maans
Iof increas,ng the ;mnortance of
their nermenent ;nstitnt;ons in
! Manila and other cities While
tbe fr;arswbn controIlod tbo oonn~
trv nar;sbas wera w;ll;no enn,,ah
10 co those in tho colleges and
se,Sinar;as were not willipp IN de-
mart and there exists no law bv
which thev can he oomnelled n
retire
This ia tho reol d;A;crItv which
governor Taft has to soIvs The
Vatican while undoubtedly will
linp to meet the views of the un;-
lea States Government ms far as
noss;ble hesitatea 10 order tho
Snon;sh i fr;ors 70 leove tbe Pb;i;ns
n!nes The ordars IN which tbe
fr;ors hoiona orc not neroiv Sron
IN ordors Snt orc onsmoyoi!tan
w;tb hyancbes ;n aII Eurnnaan -
cnnnt,.;as and cnnsennontiu avort
great ;nfnence at Rome To or.
3er Tho w;tbJrawai Of tho fr;ora
against tbo;r will would he nlac;no
t6e Vat;can in q nas;t;on of an
taoonism r. the reI;o5ons orders I'd
Thara .soms 40 70 hn : hona thot
1 soma n;dJia cro,nJ will be reoch'
ed nnnn which il will bs noss;bIe
~ srr;ya ~ on oaraomont TIE
| withdrawal Of The friars is desirad
Inv th;s oovernmant NOT on rel;o;-
ous ~ bst nm noI;t;coj oronnds
It "a not tba Whole hrosberhood
80 frars ard mnnLs that th;s
4 government i anx;ous ~ hor
Prom tba Pb;i;nn;nas hnt ,ha nar
slf;cular Snan;sh fr;ars IN whom the
Tii;n;nos ara so h;ttayiy or,naed
| Tha sama ohiect;on yo, a ,,nt
.lboId AGAINST 4marican nr;asts or
! monks. or even against friars of
other nationalit;as than Snan;sb
| II ought then 70 he nossibIa for
1.-The ,elio;ous orJars to which tba
fr;ars in the Ph;linn;nes owe che
dience tn renlace the;r Snan;sb
lbrethren bv mambers of thar ra.
speotive orders of other national
| ities ureferablv English-sneak;no
priests. Such . conrse would not.
danr;va tho ral;o;ons or,,ors of tbo
control of the Schools thev have
founded
I n Il of tba oraatast ;mnortonce
that AN amicable arranoamant of
This difficulty should he arrival
AZ. 80 az 10 obv;ate relio;ou. mis-
understandinos in this country
1 Accordino IN American law Il Il
not nossi6le to ban;sh The fr;o re ~
from the Islands aa lnnn os tha1
arc low-oh;d;na nor ;s;7 con,nc
tent For th;s Govsrnmont 70 - ~