The Nome nugget., 1902-04-30

, 10 opposi.e No 10 creek claim un the southeast side ot Dahl creek; No, on Quartz creek; No. D on Quartz creek: No 6 on Quartz trcek: NO. below Nelson's discovery on kougarok riVer; No ; nbovc discovery on Turner creek: discoV- l cry on Baldy creek: No. | on Alder creek; No. above upper discovery on Conce creek. trib utary of Quartz creek; No. on Stone gulch u tributary of Hurris creek; undivided onc-half of bench claims No. above upper discovery on Quartz creek, right limit, opposite No. creek claim: undivided one half Of bench claim oppo- site No on the south side uf Garry creek; uii- divided one half of bench claim No. below the upper discovery On the cast Siue Of Quartz creek: undivided One-hnlf of bench claim No. above the upper discovery on Garry creek. All the above named in the kougarok recording district, Second division, District of Alaska. Also those certain mining claims, lands and premises situated in the Port Clarence recOru- ing district. District oI Alaska, described as Io lows: Placer claims No. above discovery on Mckinley creek, situate at the head or Grant ley harsor: No. 5 below on Last Chance creek; l No. aabove on SluarA guicn' and No above discovery on Fox creek. Also those certain | mining claims, lands and premises situated Tn the Three Rock mining district, District of Alaska as tolow Ser e,amS iscoDcrr no o on | Yellowstone creek: No. above discovery on Willow creek; No. on Quartz creek: also an undivided one half of lot No. 10 in block l in Port iarence City, District of Alaska; ulso an undivided one-half of No. l extension of the Hudson quartz ledge, on the east Aide Of Quartz creek.
 And the relief demanded in the amended com plulnL is that pending the determination of this action the ueIen0antS aud all parties to this action be cnjoineo from mining upon UT ex tracting gold gold aust from the mining claims anu premises above dcscriDed and that upon lhe final hearing .id inJulctlon be made perpetual against ueIelALiunto Scnntlucr, Drake. John Due anu Richard Roe also that the saiu defendants Gnd each Of them be required to set for.h the nature of their claims to Suld above dcs :ribed mining claims and premises, and that all claims adverse to tho piaintiiIs De qui ted and determined by decree Uf this court; that the defendants Schneider. Drake John Doe uId .l h. intc. est whatsoever in the said above described mining claims and premises or any part thereof and that tn. titie of the plaintiffs thercto is valid anu paramOunt; thot the dcfcndants .hne ider, Drake, John Doc and Richard Roc and each of them b. forever barred from assert ing any claim to said land and premises or any Dart thereof adverse to the claims of the plain titfS; that plaintiffs recover costs and dsDurse- mcnLs and general relief. The defendanls John Doe and Richard Roe arc alleged in said amend cC complaint to be fictitious nameS of defend untS whose true names are unknown to the plaintiffs, and plaintiffs in said amended con- plaint pray that when as;ertained their true names be inserted ard all proceedings amended accordingly. 1t is also alleged ln the said amended complaint that plantin PodhOrski is the owner of an undivided one-half interest in said mining claims anu premises that plaintiff Branucr is the owner Of an undivided One-fourLh interest therein, und that the defenuant F.. E. Harlow is the owner or an undivided one quarter thereof and that said E. E. Harlow is made de- fendant because his consent to become pluintin cannot be obtained.
 And you, Che OcIcnuantS uIOreSalO, 0rc nercDy nOtineu that if you Iaii 10 answer the amended complaint the plaintiffs will apply to the court for the refer demanded therein.
 This summons has by an order of the above cntitied court dated and filed the 2yth day of April. lyO2, in the oflice of the clerk of said court ut Nome, AlusSa, been ordered to be served Dv publication ill the NoME NuGG EFT, q neWspaper published ut Nome, Alaska. and said publication by said order was directed to be nude once week for six weeks. The date of the first publication of this summons will be ASff1 SJtl, ltu2 and Inc date of the fast pubiica tiOn June iLh, lIO2. uL which time said puDiica. tiOn will bc cOmpicte, and you, the Said defend. ants. ure hereby nothied that you arc required to answer the said amended complaint within thirty (3U) days after the said llth day of June, lt02, being the date Of the completion of such period Vt publication, and that r you fail to up. pear und answer said amended complaint within thirty (9Q) days from the date last aforesaid the plaintiff will apply to the court for the relief de- map(,Dd In the amended complaint and judg- ment for want of such answer will be taken against you
 Witnes, the Honorable James Wickersham Judge of .Le said United States District Uurt and the seal of said court, affixed this A%th day of April, lvV.
 ...-..- H. G. STEEL,
 Clerk of tho United States Dis. .-' tri.t COurt, District of Al.ASku, fScall Second Division.
 By JOHN T. REED,
 Deputy Clcrk
 Ira D. Orton. attorney for plaintiffs, Nome AlaSSa. 4-3u-7tW