Evening star., 1902-01-13
LEGAL NOTICES.

,ss TIE Gogar ,,sg, or sE THE Dls
Benetical Endowment Assoeiation ct al. appeiiees;
No. 1882. Henry Anne Stuart, appellant. vs. the
al. appelIees; No. llss--The death of one Of the
appeliees, James S. Edwards. having been dnly
solicitors for Henry Anne Stuart. and Mt. Thomas
NJ. Fields. solicitor for William T. Gilbert, re-
publication it is this seventh day Of January, 1904
ordered that unless Della r. Edwards sole execu-
testament Of said James s. Edwards deceased,
and William 8. Buehly, sole heir-at-law and next
esry oseome parties hereto Within Sixty n days fron
the date Of this order the said Henry Anne Stuart
iants. or either Of them, shall be- entitled to Open
the record. and on hearing have the decree ap-
pesled from M reversed 4 e & se erroneous provided
lished in the District Of Columbia for two
sive weeks at least thirty days before the expira
tion of the said sixty days. By the court: R. H.
alvey. Chief Justice. true copy-Test: ROB-
the District Of Columbia ja13&202t
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT
Of Columbia holding special term for Orphans
Peter Dill. deceased. No. s225 Administration
docket Alt appearing ts The M court that the no.
relating to the validity Of the paper writing da
the 18th day Of February. 1896, purporting to be
ceased has been returned as to Edward pfI, Eliza.
beth Raum. Eva K. Kraft, Margaret Thalheimer.
Nancy EiixdDetu EsssiH, refer fIelIer, ann
Din. Edward ]. Dnl. Maurice DIN and Leo. A.
Dill, mot to be found 1t IS this 18th day Of
December 1901 ordered that the issues heretofore
framed In the case be, and they are hereby, set
down for trial on the 18th day Of January 1892
and that this order and copy Of said issues here
tofore framed shall be published once a week for
four weeks In the Washington Law Reporter and
twice week for the same period In The Evening
Star newspaper Of Washington city, D, c. JOB
BARNARD, Justice. Atte4: JOHN r. ROUZER,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT
of Columbia, holding special term for Orphans
Court business In the matter OF the estate of
Peter Dill. deceased. Administration No. 1925 =
Upon motion Of counsel for the eaveators in this
case counsel for the caveatees being present and
the matter having been argued and submitted to
the court. 1t is. this 9th day of December A. D.
1885, ordered that the following issues In this case
be and they hereby approved for trial by jury
1. Was the paper-writfng bearing date February
49, 1885, which was filed in this court February
"a $685. duly executed by the said Peter Dill as
and for his last Will and testament? 2 IL the
said paper writing executed by the said Peter
Dill, was he at the time Of such execution of
sound and disposing mind and capable OF executing
a valid deed or contract? 8. Was the execution
and practfced upon the said Peter Dill by the per-
named In said paper-writing executors OF
benefciaries by any Of them, or by any person
or persons? 4. Was the execution of said paper
writing procured by the undue influence OF any
person or persons? 5. II the said paper writing
was duly executed by the said Peter Dill as bis
last will and testament, did he at the time he
executed the same know the contents thereof? A.
B. HAGNER. Associate Justice. el9-th&m 4w