Yorkville enquirer. [volume] (Yorkville, S.C.) 1855-2006, 1902-04-23
CIRCUIT COURT.


CIRCUIT COURT.
After discharging the petit jurors
last Thursday, the circuit court took
up the consideration of common pleas
business and during Friday and Satur-
day disposed of the business on Cal
endar No. 2 as follows:
r. ]. Castles, plaintiff, against r. j.
Castles and ]. w. Castles doing busi-
ness as Castles Bros, J. M. Castles
and w. M. Moore defendants. Judg-
ment in favor of the plaintiff in the
sum of $244.42.
T. B. McClain, plaintiff, against R.
B. Lowry, defendants. Judgment In
favor of the plaintiff in the sum Of
$376.37.
Supplee Hardware company plain
if, VS.. w. H. Hicklin, defendant.
Judgment for plaintiff in the sum OF
s125.54.
Liipfert, Scales & Co., plaintiff vs..
w. H. Hicklin. Judgment for plaintiff
in the sum Of $10s.55.
S. S. McNinch & Co., plaintiff VS.. w.
H. Hicklin, defendant. Judgment for
plaintiff in the sum of s527.2s.
The w. C. McMurpny Co., plaintiff
VS.. w. H. Hicklin defendant. Judg-
ment for plaintiff in the sum Of $166.2O.
Exchange Bank Of Chester plaint-
iff VS.. Fannie c. Bratton defendant.
Judgment for plaintiff in the sum OF
$11O.92.
In the case of Louis Roth VS.. c. H.
Smith, an order was ISSUED vacating an
attachment, sued out by Mr.. Roth
against property Of Mr.. Smith. i.
Second week jurors answered to
their names on Monday as follows:
w. M. White, T. L.. Carroll, ]. F..
Miller, r. L. Campbell, A. A. Burris, j.
r. Gardner, ]. w. Jones, E. D. Dar-
win, w. J. shilinglaw, ]. r. Neil, j.
R Scoggins, ]. w. Bankhead, ]. H.
Sutton, L. F. Sossaman, s. L. Pursley,
T. w. Moore, w. S. Hogue. T. E..
Brandon, H. H. Sherer, w. L. Boyd,
J. R. Conoly, w. ]. Hayes, ]. w. Lii
ley, Thad Thomas, J. E. Burns, R. M.
bratton, c. T. Douglas, c. R. Means,
W. H. Dickson, S. H. Hood, w. D.
Leslie, w. B. Workman, X. E. Burns,
j. j. Clinton, S. b. Sturgis. G. W..
Knox.
The first jury case taken up was
that Of Geo. w. Brooks vs.. w. L. Hill.
The trial consumed the morning ses-
sion. The jury found for the plaintiff
in the sum of $10S.76.
T. E. Myers & Co., vs. Martin ".
Wallace. Suit for s274.46 alleged to be
due by the defendant for pumps
bought from the plaintiff. The plaint-
iff admitted that he had bought the
pumps and that the claim was correct;
but set up that the purchase had been
made with the understanding that the
defendant was to have complete con-
troll Of certain counties and that plaint-
iff afterward sold to other dealers in
these counties, and demanded him to
the amount Of $3.50. Verdict for the
plaintiff in the full amount susa- -fau-
Universal1.s's,..-hfGg Co., VS.. J. c.
Ua..:60rn. In this case the plaintiff set
up that 1t had sold to one ]. M. Glib
son certain books on the guarantee Of
the defendant that he would stand be-
hind the plaintiff to the amount Of $500.
The alleged written guarantee was set
forth in the complaint. 1t was claim
ed that Gibson had purchased books
to the amount of $94.15, and that al
though he had paid nothing at all, the
company had by mistake sent him
receipt bill for $3.50, and demanded,
the return of this bill when the mis-
take was discovered. Gibson, how
ever, had withheld the receipt. The
defendant admitted that he had made
certain recommendations as to the
Of Gibson; but claim
ed that If he had signed the written
guarantee as alleged, 1t was without
Of the contents, and was
under misapprehension. He insisted
that he owed the plaintiff nothing
whatever. The jury found for the
plaintiff in the full amount sued for.
Holiday & Cave VS.. T. T. Morrison.
This was a suit for $153, laundry b4fs
claimed of the defendant by the plain
tiff. Defendant had been agent for
the plaintiff, and had transferred the
agency to another agent. He claimed
that the bill was made after his agen-
cy had been discontinued. At o'clock
yesterday afternoon, the case had not
been concluded.
The next case on the calendar was
that Of S. w. Mitchell vs. the Wood
men Of the World and it was expected
that it would be reached during the af-
ternoon.
LOCAL LACONlCS.
We VIII Send The Enquirer
From now until January 1, 1903. for
s1.36 n advance.