The St. Louis Republic., 1902-12-12

With whom al they make arrange
mrnIS Tor III" Use ii the hall
Robertson came 10 nv once AMI en-
gas"i the hail. a. SchnettIer Was ou1 OF the
'.n:l they pay ren, for the use of the
Not that I know Of
Was s'hnetrIer Present al the meet
He used to serve the Delegates with re-
h.%s had offered Ia waiye al! arguments
before the jGry. and Judge Douglas had
rad IN. instructions. that each side should
ARGJMENTS OF ATTORNEYS
LIMITED To FIFTEEN MINUTES.
Judge Clark made the defens.'s argu-
m"nt T." paid considerable attention 10
IN" wi irnc- which showed tha; Schn-ttleI'
had AZ certain times voted against the
combine and referred Ia The testimony as
to the defendants character. JUICE Clark
TrirrIv. to III. testimony Of John k. and
+. Z. MUry.I and Robertson a. that Of
placed in such position tndt they could
not testify otherwise
He DECLARED That il ha We're a juror h.
would not Axe - decide that L man is
guilty uI evidence given hy dccrmpiiCs- i;i
Al alleged crime
Circuit Attorney Folk in reply - this
argument. declared il !nI- s=ibIe 10 prove
The crime Of bri2-r. without Information
from SOM OF those interested il. il. He
-" uT'n and that the testimony "f some OF
those on fE- lHSde il necessary for the
stat" /" rrov" it, cas-
Referring in thc question uf character
Mr. Folk declared that mani meI have
g"r" on FOR :-arE committing unlawful
acts with"u: II. knowledge o: rsIeiE Trends
ana in this case ne declared tEat S.!-:.-r-
tl.T friends W"rc. not aware that ~. was
a member of = combine. :he purpose az
which We 'e pace q Pic, on the vo'.- II
IN. In.+r- would east At This point Schnef-
Tier seen u wipe MS eyes with i:is
haudk"r'n..'. and 10 sank d.wn no his
,hdi:. 'ht words seeming 20 hav. great ef-
fec; on him
circuit .ittoFrey Folk ciozrI ny calling
upon IL" jn~y to r-turn verdict ". }:
w@I.a - War:,ns 10 ethers iiat 81. louis
EIGHTH GpNVIGTIDN IN NINE: TRIALS
The conviction al ScEn-tj!er is the eighth
of these rlarg..i ..i'h bo ding VINO thus
far have enc 10 trial Bat one has ls"n
acquitted of the nine tried. Henry NicOial:s
having been found not El.lty hy 4 Jury uE-
DIR Instructions fr.TS Judge RYAN.
Emil !. Msys.HnErG T.a< III" first IA he
tried. II" WIS IN. inter ii rh- City t0un-
Gil AMI Eas foTnl guilty 0f bribery in The
Suhurhrr t,aaI on March q. The jury 1xed
Julius Lehman came r"x'. and was CON
Weed Of perjury N May -. 1872. II 1-s
charged tnat n" testified falsely when the
Grand ..iry investigated n" Suburoan ,ieai.
lie was sentenced 10 TWO years tmprisotl-
,ucn-.
Harry y. Faulkner tired on The same
charge as that Of Lehman, WIS fo:.na
guilty on July - Two years. also. was
agreed jpon A. th. penalty
Roi-Tt NJ. Snyder. barker and capitalist
of Kansas Crry and New York was next
foU0G guilty on Ooroler Of bribery in the
Central Traction ,;ea!. and the jury fixed
his punishment at t.ve years imprisonment
Next came tn" -ri~! Of Edmund Berscf.
charged with perjury In the Suburban deal.
His punishment vs. nN2d N five rra-S'
Imprisonment. The verdict was returned DC
tcbcr g.
Edward Butler. charged with attempted
was found guilty at Columbia on
November II. He was sentenced TO serve
thrC. years
Henry NicoIaus was acquitted Of h-ih-
cry. il accordance with instruct i0rs from
Juig" Ryan. ly p jury IN December 3.
Charles I my was corv cte,i o? De
ccmbsr NJ perjury in the Suburban :can-
day inquiry and punishment Of two years
rSseG