Burlington weekly free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1866-1928, 1902-04-24

noon. In the case of Eva A. Phelps vs.. Ed
ward c. Phelps, the petitioner was given
leave to amend her petition by adding
adultery as a ground for divorce and the
case was continued. David G. Moriarty VS..
Abigail d. Moriarty, bill granted for de-
sertion; Ira Pierce VS.. Mary Pierce. pc
titon dismissed; Minnie NJ. Jones VS..
James F. Jones, bill granted for neglect
and refusal to support; Sylvia L. Hood
VS.. Charles II. Hood, bill granted for
neglect and refusal to support Lillian NJ.
Tewksbury vs. Lee G. Tewksbury, no de-
cision rendered; Florence M. Jones VS..
Fred Jones, bill granted for neglect and
refusal to support.
At ] 80 the entire jury calendar and court
calendar were called with Judge Start pre-
siding. The following cases were entered
settled and discontinued: Jessie L. Wood
vs.. II. =. Agnostines, apt; Frank Ploof VS..
Edward Lee; Lowe & Phillips, apt. vs..
Peck Bros. Odule Gilbert VS.. Alex Latour-
neau; Charles M. Gray VS. l.. Il. Ormsbee,
apt; A. ]. Durkee VS.. Hugo Funke; A. l..
Bailey VS.. Alex Dundas. apt; Jessie l..
Wood VS.. II. p Agnostinos. apt: George
A. French ct al. VS.. Town of Cabot; East
man Bros. VS.. Mart j. Berry AMI trustee
and appellant claimant John Chynoweth
VS.. c. A. Bond and trustee; Lambkn a.
Foster VS.. w. II. Gale; Whitcomb Bros.
VS.. Patrick Kane and trustee; Capital
Savings Bank & Trust Co. vs.. George w.
Scott
In John Osborne. apt VS.. James Alexan-
der, judgment for plaintiff. Barclay Bros.
VS.. +. f. Conoli & Co., apt. judgment for
plaintiff to recover his costs Lane Manu-
featuring Co. VS.. American Pneumatic
Tool Co and Vermont Marble Co., trustee,
judgment was rendered for plaintiff to re-
cover 800 and Judgment against trustee
for amount of disclosure. George +. Par
sons VS.. Hiram b. Ayers, judgment for de-
PENDANT without costs.
A large number of cases were continued
and only few comparatively now remain
for trial on either calendar
| AS soon as the docket was called Judge
Haselton went on with the trial of the case
of Daniel Gilman vs. Henry Carrow. The
evidence was concluded at $40 and the ar
guments will he heard in the morning.
Montpelier. April Elm county court to-
day the arguments in the case of Daniel
Gilman vs. Henry Carlow were taken up
at Q o'clock, +. L. Laird speaking for the
plaintiff and J. p Lamson for the defend
ant After the charge by Judge fIaselton
the jury took the case at about II O'Clock.
The case of Terance Mckane VS.. Mari
& Gordon was Immediately put on for trial
and jury empaneled. In the afternoon
the plaintiff at once took the stand. In
this case the plaintiff sues for $4,000 DAM
/ ages for injuries received while drilling out
n blast which exploded while at work on
the quarry owned and operated by the de-
PENDANT. The plaintiff alleges 1t was
through the negligence or fault of the de-
PENDANTS that the accident occurred. The
defendants claim has not yet been brought
out.
At 2:S0 the jury in the GilmonCarrow
case came in for further instructions but
at o'clock had not agreed on "A verdict.
FINES FOR DRUNKENNESS
In city court this morning the three men
who were arrested Saturday night were
arraigned, all on the charge of intoxica-
ton. Thomas Gibbons, who was COM
planned of by his wife for beating her,
pleaded not guilty but was found guilty by
the court and fine Of so and costs of
sl5.s5 imposed. The respondent put in no
evidence and appealed the case Edward
McGill going bail in the sum Of $50
Elmer Mason also pleaded not guilty but
was fined s. and costs of sl5.S5. He entered
an appeal and w. n. Thierault, his counsel
went bail In the sum of $50.
Michael eastman pleaded guilty and
was fined s. and costs of SIZES with the
alternative ten days in jail. He went to
jail. Burton +. Bailey prosecuted in each
case, his brother, Grand Juror F. A.
Bailey being absent.