The San Juan County index. (Aztec, N.M.) 1890-19??, 1902-02-07

on the Beet Sugar industry Ia this
country. appeared on the editorial page
Of the New York Evening Post of De-
cember 18th. 1901. and as every house
hold IN the land is interested m sugar
the article win be of universal interest
"rhe Evening Post bids the heartiost
welcome to every American industry
that can stand on its own bottom and
make it's way without leaning on the
poor rates. Among these s~elf-support-
ing industries, we are glad to know 70
the production Of beet sugar. AT ali
events, it was such two years ago.. We
publish elsewhere q letter written in
1899, and signed BY Mr.. Oxnard and
Mr.. Cutting the chiefs Of this indus
try on the eastern side Of the Rocky
Mountains, showing that this was the
happy condition of the trade at that
time. If parties masquerading as beet
sugar producers are besieging the Pres
ident and Congress at this moment.
and pretending that they viii be ruined
II Cuban sugar Is admitted for six
months at half the present rates OF
duty, their false ~pretences ought to be
exposed.
"The letter Of Messrs. Oxnard and
Cutting was probably written for the
purpose Of inducing the farmers Of the
Mississippi valley to go more largely
into the cultivation Of beets for the
sugar factories. This was a laudable
motive for telling the truth and show
ing the large profits which awaited
both the b%eet-grower and the manufac-
turer If the industry were p%ersevering-
" and intelllgently prosecuted To this
end 1t was pointed out that farmers
could clear sos per acre by %cultivating
beets, and might even make 500. But
In order TO assure the c%ultivator that
he would not be exposed to reverses
by possible changes in the tariff, they
proceeded to show that the industry
stood in no need Of protection.
'The beet sugar Industry, these gem
tlemen say, Stands on as firm a basis
as any business In the country" They
point out the fact-a very important
one-that their product comes out as a
finished article, refined and granulat-
ed. It Is not, like c%ane-sugar grown
in the West India Islands, a black and
offensive paste, which must be carried
in wagons to the seaboard and thence
by ships to the United States, where,
after another handling, 1t is put
through a costly refinery, and then
shipped by rail to the consumer, who
may possibly be In Nebraska alongside
q beet sugar factory which turns out
the refined and granulated article at
n fell swoop. Indeed, the advan-
tages Of the producer OF beet sugar for
supplying the domestic consumption
are very great. We have no doubt that
Messrs. Oxnard and Cutting are within
bounds when they say that sugar can
be produced here cheaper than it can
be in Europe The reasons for this
are that
The sugar industry is, after all,
merely an agricultural one. We can
undersell Europe in all other crops,
and sugar is no exception
1T follows as naturally as the maxi
ing Of flour from wheat. If we can
produce wheat cheaper than Europe,
then naturally we can produce -four
cheaper, as we do.
But the writer's Of the letter do not
depend upon a-priori reasoning to prove
tAat they can make sugar sc & profit
Without tarin protection. They polntto
the fact that under the Mckinley tariff
OF 1890, when sugar was free Of duty,
the price Of the article was 4 cents per
pound. Yet a net profit Of 50 per ton
was made by the beet-sugar factories
under those conditions, not counting
any bounty on the home production OF
sugar. They boast that they made this
profit while working under absolute
free trade, and they have a right to be
proud Of this result Of their skill and
industry. Many beet-sugar factories
had been started in bygone years, back
In the sixties and seventies of the nine
tenth century, and had failed because
the projectors did not understand the
business. Since then great progress has
been made, both here and abroad, in
the cultivation and manipulation OF the
beet. What was impossible thirty years
ago is now entirely feasible. The in
dustry is already on a solid and endur-
ing basis. There are factories in the
United States, these gentlemen tell US
in their letter, capable Of using 100000
tons Of beets per annum at a profit Of
So per ton. and this would make a
profit Of 5 1,O5O,OOO as the income to
be earned under absolute free trade.
1T must be plain to readers Of this
letter, signed by the captains OF the
beet-sugar industry, that the people in
Washington who are declaiming
against the temporary measure which
the President OF the United States
urges for the relief Of the Cuban peo-
pie. are either grossly ignorant OF the
subject, or are practising gross decep-
ton. The tenable ground for them is
to say: Other people are having pro
lection that they do not need, ana
therefore we ought to have more than
we need. This would be consistent
with the letter Of Messrs. Oxnard and
Cutting, but nothing else Is So"
CLEVELAND EiSTEDDFOD.