Rosebud County news. [volume] (Forsyth, Mont.) 1901-1906, 1902-01-02
the BEET SUGAR INDUSTRY.

THE BEET SUGAR INDUSTRY.
A most important article. giving
Messrs. Oxnard's and Cuttings views
on the Beet Sugar industry In this
country, appeared on the editorial page
OF the New York Evening Post Of De-
cember 18th, 1901, and as every house.
hold In the land Is interested in sugar
the article will be Of universal interest.
| The Evening Post bids the heartiest
welcome to every American industry
that can stand ON its own bottom and
make its way without leaning on the
poor rates. Among these self-support-
ing industries, we are glad to know, is
the production of beet sugar. At all
events. it was such two years ago. We
publish elsewhere letter written in
1899. and signed by Mr.. Oxnard and
Mr.. Cutting, the chiefs of this indus
try on the eastern side of the Rocky
Mountains, showing that this was the
| happy condition of the trade at that
time. If. parties masquerading as beet
sugar producers are besieging the Pres
ldent and Congress at this moment,
ana pretending that they will be ruined
cuban sugar Is admitted for six
months at half the present rates of
! auty, their false pretences ought to be
exposed.
"The letter of Messrs. Oxnard and
cutting was probably written for the
purpose OF inducing the farmers Of the
mississippi valley to go more largely
into the cultivation of beets for the
sugar factories. This was q laudable
motive for telling the truth and show
ing the large profits which awaited
both the beet-grower and the manufac-
turer If the industry were persevering-
~ and intelligently prosecuted. To this
end 1t was pointed out that farmers
could clear $65 per acre by cultivating
beets, and might even make 500. But
In order to assure the cultivator that
he would not be exposed to reverses
ny possible changes in the tariff, they
proceeded to show that the industry
stood In no need of protection.
"The beet sugar industry. these gen.
tlemen say, Stands on as firm basis
as any business in the country" They
point out the fact-a very important
one-that their product comes out as q
finished article, refined and granulat-
ed. 1t is not, like cane-sugar grown
in the West India Islands, a black and
offensive paste, which must be carried
in wagons to the seaboard and thence
by ships to the United States, where.
after another handling, it is put
through costly refinery, and then
shipped by rail to the consumer, who
may possibly be in Nebraska alongside
"a beet sugar factory which turns out
the refined and granulated article at
one fell sWoOp. Indeed, the advan-
tages of the producer Of beet sugar for
supplying the domestic consumption
are very great. We have no doubt that
Messrs. Oxnard and Cutting are within
bounds when they say that sugar can
be produced here cheaper than it can
be in Europe The reasons for this
are that
"The sugar industry is, after all,
merely an agricultural one. We can
undersell Europe in all other crops
and sugar is no exception
ut follows as naturally as the max
ing Of flour from wheat. If we can
produce wheat cheaper than Europe.
then naturally we can produce -four
cheaper, as we do.
But the writer's of the letter do not
depend upon a-priori reasoning to prove
that they can make sugar at a profit
without tariff protection. They point to
the fact that under the Mckinley tariff
of 1890, when sugar was free of duty,
the price of the article was cents per
pound. Yet net profit of SO per ton
was made by the beet-sugar factories
under those conditions, not counting
any bounty on the home production of
sugar. They boast that they made this
profit while working under absolute
free trade and they have right to be
proud of this result of their skill and
industry. Many beet-sugar factories
had been started in bygone years, back
in the sixties and seventies of the nine
teenth century, and had failed because
the projectors did not understand the
business. Since then great progress has
been made, both here and abroad, in
the cultivation and manipulation of the
beet. What was impossible thirty years
ago is now entirely feasible. The in
dustry is already ON solid and endur-
ing basis. There are factories in the
United States, these gentlemen tell us
in their letter, capable of using $50 900
tons of beets per annum at a profit of
SO per ton, and this would make a