Evening journal., 1902-11-24
SUPERIOR COURT
CASES FOR TRIAL
Present Indications That
There Will Be a Long
Session This Term
WHEN CAUSES WILL BE HEARD

Eight Special Jury Trials on the
Calendar for the November Term o
Court
Superior Court opened this morning,
and from present indications it will
be long term, as there are a large
number Of cases for trial. The daily
calendar Of cases for trial today was
as follows:
Monday, November 24-Maggle NJ.
Jamison vs.. James II. S. Gam and Paul
Gillis sheriff; John MacFarane VS.. Car
lrett & Barr; John w. Pennington and
Harry Z. Pennington VS.. John L. Lewis;
lSt- Stanislaus beneficial Society and
st. Joseph's Polish Catholic Beneficial
Society VS.. st. Hedwig's Church.
Those for the balance OF the term
follow:
Tuesday, November 25-Pruiential
Insurance Company VS.. Charles 10.
Maser; William II. Massey VS.. Dia-
mond State Steel Company; Courtland
lWagon Company VS.. John p. Springer's
administrators; John B. McAllistsr VS..
Peoples Railway Company; John
lGam vs. Absalom COrdery, and Bar
bara MCGOWAN, ct al, VS.. B. & p. r. r.
Co.
, Wednesday, November 26-Mary
, lMaxfleld VS.. Peoples Railway Com
pany; Charles Reynolds VS.. August II.
Viewig; Frederick c. Snyder VS.. Peo-
pies Railway Company; Henry X.
Armstrong VS.. George B. W. Rhoads;
Meter Brothers VS.. Harry StOeclxle,
and Minnie Harris VS.. George w. Will
kie.
Friday. November 2S.-Thomas ].
Gosslin VS.. Wilmington Aerie Of
Eagles; William White VS.. Peter Nc
Closkey; Mabel II. Collision VS.. Clar-
ence G.. Kirk; Alexander Faber VS..
Standard Lime and Stone Company;
Maria A. HOxie VS.. Thomas Davidson's
administrator, ct al; Samuel r. Price
r vs., p, W. & b. R. R. Co
Monday. December Sarah A. Cof-
fin VS.. Robert A. Conaway; Jerome
j. Sheppard, ct al. VS.. Hercules Pow
der Company, garnishee Of Joseph w.
Millard: Robert /. Coffin VS.. Samuel
A. Mcdaniel; Diamond State Bottling
Company VS.. Peoples Railway COM
p pany. and Eminent MoTTow VS. same.
/ Tuesday, December 2-Andrew Mum
' ldon VS.. Peoples hallway Company;
Nollie L, Smith VS.. John +. McLaugh-
lin: John Howard Morris VS.. Whining
lion, CITY Railway Company; Evan
Lewis VS.. White Brothers; Hulda John
-, son VS.. Singer Manufacturing Com
many: Wallace c. IattOmus VS.. William
e. Hawkins.
Wednesday, December 3-Artemas
d smith. ct al. VS.. Wilmington Savings
Fund Society; Charles II. Colburn VS.
people's Railway Company; Richard
Fmmons VS.. William II. Morris ct ali
Charles J.. Wolller VS.. Delaware Gran
ite ana Mining Company; Beatric.
Leitch VS.. Sue G. Elliott; Albert Frank
ish VS.. same; Francis Harvey Day VS.
Gilpin S. Woodward
Thursday, December Andrew J.
Travis vs.. John Leney; James w. Ag
new VS.. John Edward Addicks; JOSEPH
r. Cough VS.. Howard c. Gray; Charles
/; Pratesi vs.. The Mayor and Council Of
Wilmington; Frank Wood vs.. Thomai
7 ]. Goslin.
Friday. December 5--Irwin Stetser'l
next friend VS.. William City Railwa.
! Company; Margaret Quinn, by her mex
friend etc. VS.. Peoples Railway Com
i, pany; William A. Boyd. Sr., VS.. vii
! mington City Electric Company; Ma
tional Wall Paper Company VS.. An
drew B. Jones.
Monday, December S-Charles ii
Colbourn VS.. Mayor and Council
! James II. Reynolds VS.. Curtis G. Bro.
] Henry T! Schuchler VS.. Robert Coburl
Dickson; George w. MoCaulley ve
, Peoples Railway Company.
Tuesday, December civilian
CraiG VS.. Martin b. Burris; John II
Dagger vs. William II. Churchman
n John H. Dagger VS.. Philip Q. Church
: man; Gideon Sibley VS.. b. & o. Rail
= road Company; State CT Delaware us
i Of William H. Hurley VS.. Augustul
I. | Hushebeck; Helen Narachowsh VS.
: Wilmington City Railway Company
benjamin David's administrators VS.
e Leonard V. Aspril Sr.; Elmer r. CO,
l. VS.. Wilmington City Railway Co.: An
d ME FOlan, widow etc, VS.. the Mayo
i and Council of Wilmington.
It The following are special jury cases
n Martha ]. Cannon, for the use of vii
Il liam Sutton. VS.. p, W. & B. Railroal
!. Company; John p. Donahoc VS.. tn
l. Star Publishing Company; Eva Syz
o manski VS.. +. Blumenthal & Co.
d Harry Roberts VS.. Harlan & Hollings
worth Company; Nathan Barsky VS.. p
w. K B. Railroad Company; f. Blu
menthal & Co., VS.. p, w. & b. Rail
road Company; Edward J. Finn VS.
same; Joseph II. Blatz's administrator
VS.. same; William II. Klair VS.. p, w
( & II. Railroad Company; Joseph Rob
e eTts VS.. p, w. & b. Railroad Com
e pany.
s NOTICE.