Bisbee daily review., 1902-06-10
DISTRICT COURT
 SIXTH DAY


 was in session during the evening.
 The case of J. S. Barrett vs. Dunlap, to quiet title. was argued before the court Mir. Barrett. acting as his owa attorney. but his skill was not sufi. cient to compete with the lawyers on the other side. and judgment was ren- dered against him. He. however. filed . notice of appeal.
 P. B. Soto vs. Pan-American Consol. dated Mining Co, debt. A stipulation was filed by the plaintiffs attorneys and a judgment and decree rendered in favor of same in accordance with the stipulation.
 Ruth w. Spencer vs. Ernest B. SpeE- cer. divorce. Witnesses examined and judgment and decree given plaintiff.
 Fren Clark vs. H. w. Etz; injunc- tion. Continued until June 9th.
 Sarah NJ. Iwel vs. Andrew J. Iwel, divorce. Witnesses examined in be- half of plaintiff. No defense. Decree ordered for plaintiff
 s. H. Bryant vs. Turquoise Mining Company ct al Gibson & Lowell, a.- torneys for plaintiff, asked leave to file second amended complaint Nurc pro Tune. as of June 9th.
 The case of Marks vs Costello, to quiet title. Set for December 8. 1902. This case was braught to settle title of mining claims in the Warren Min ing mining distrist, and is of the same general bearing as the case brought by Shattuck vs. Costello, which is now before the supreme court, and in which a rehearing was recently granted by that body.
 The case of A. H. Emanuel, admins trator. vs Bisbee West Mining Com pany. damages. Set for Thursday. June 12th. g a. m.
 Mulkey vs. Walker, to quiet title; set for Friday, June 18th.
 J. S Williams ct al vs Martin O'Hare. to quiet title. Witnesses ex- amined for both sides and arguments presented; case taken under advise ment till Monday. This case was brought by John Williams, c. A. Over lock, l. W. Wallace and others against Martin O'Hare on a question of title to an alleged mining claim, which was claimed by O'Hare, in Tombstone can yon, near the Warren Laundry. The plaintiffs had built their residences on . part of the ground within the bound ary of the said claim, known as the Quartzite strip, prior to its being claimed by O'Hare as amining claim Upon locating the claim O'Hare tried to compel the plaintiff to pay him for the ground upon which they were liv- ing subsequent to this; O'Hare applied for a patent to the claim in the United States Land office at Tucson. To this application a contest was filed by Over lock and others and commissioner of the general land office refused to grant the application of O'Hare. The ruling of the court in this case will be watched with interest by Bisbee prop erty holders, as it will no doubt set a precedence and settle some of the disputes now raging between O'Hare and other parties.
 Case of Angus vs.. Radoyid, debt, which was set for yesterday afternoon, was set for Monday g a n. The de fendant not being present in court with his papers.
 The trial jury is to be on hand in the morning at 9 o'clock. The follow. ing names appear on the venire:
 John Pidwell, c. H. Wiles, Frank Merrill. Al Thompson. Henry Raf ferty, Albert Bacon, F.. F. Mason, D. S Drew, w. w. Bostwick, John Critch- ley, Ed Tarbell, George Vanderman, w. H. Willingham, James .Herrick, N. Medigovich. T. P. Nichols, George Shearer, John Kelso, George Overack- CT, Robert Todd. Ed F. Williams, John Summers, J N. Christiansen, D. c. McLane. W. W. McKim, J. A. Wick strom, Bud Snow, George Spindle, J. N. Hunsaker, Levi Scranton, c. II. Price, Ed Farringly. A Busby, A. D. Staniger, J. J. McClelland. J. J. Muir head.
 Bisbee has only five men on the list, most of them being residents of Tomb stone. It is expected that on account of the large number of murder cases to be tried, and many jurors are op- posed to capital punishment. that a special venire of fifty more jurors will be made during the middle Of the week.
 The first criminal case to be taken