The Bemidji pioneer., 1902-04-24

I UETEDy " ~,
Carel, state chemist, as an expert in the case
1 OF the State OF Minnesota vs. Geo. LaDue and
| John Berry.
Board re-conyened as per adjournment. All
On motion, the following claims were al
! lowed.
J = Reynolds Justice fees. state VS.
/ Sam AUSTIN .....s..aS 5 So
| j L Reynolds justice fees, state VS.
Charles McCO 4. 3. 49, sc
>. Z, Reynolds Justice fees state vs. I.
L JDnu Diver. Al
~ L Reynolds justice fees. state VS. "A
ID brown. .sstf Gl
. Reynolds justice fees, state vsA |.
4 Lnurs BraUDlcK
Fl Haldeman taking Testimony. state
VS. VIM Oliver 4. II s.
| Angus Chisholm board for prisoner
state VS. James Holmes 81. 49,. .l....-.s.3 s OF
f Shook witness fees, state VS. James
Holmes j IL
Lloyd Carlton witness fees, state VS.
Eugene B0sSard ..s,. !. i. .5ssfI IL
| II GunSnlus witness fees state VS.
! James Holmes. go. ...... ..... s5I IL
1 George Jewett witness sfees, state vs.
Eugene Bossard NJ J. 49,. II Il
H Holdeman taking testimony, state
VS. NeWby =. ..s. ...-.-$ IL %
Harry Bisgood witness fees, state VS.
| James Holmes. ~. ..s. - IL
| ri A Dickerson justice fees statesys
John Johnson, et al ). 4. !. 4. :. n. q. lii 60
Joe Wise witness fees, state VS. Chasf
John Carlton witness fees. state IS g y
Eugene Bossard, y. 4. ...s / IL
HI stechnan witness fees, state VS.
James Holmes. Z. s3s1 12
| J II Gates witness fees, state VS. James
is y Gregg witness fees. state vs.
James Holmes a II
/ Ey Hennes ou. constable fees state ys
] = Johnson witness fees, state vs.
| Bert Angel. -. ........... .....s... II II
Anna Johnson witness fees. state vs.
Bert Angel /. D. ......... i IL
AM Mallory witness fees, state vs.
Major. ..,......... IL 10
II Haldeman state VS. b III Major, ct al
| taking testimony ...s..... IL Is
Frank Steele witness fees state W.
James Holmes 40. !. a. !. Il IL
Charles Harris witness fees, state VS.
Ma10r IL ~
| I johnson constable fees, state VS.
George Searles I. 81. +. s. /. 50
u Felt justice fees, state VS. George :,
i SEarleS .5s b 81
Louis Dudrey constable fees, state VS.
j Casey and John Doe +. ". 81. s3 90
| Henderson meals for prisoners. state
i vs. Casey, 81 o. 4. I, 90
| j McMurry guarding prisoners, state
vs. Casey, ct al RI. . %
William Hensel witness fees. state VS. .
James Holmes u
swan Torkelson constable fees, state
VS. Ole Wesberg .. III. y. s-,...,.. II 45
Frank Julin witness fees, state VS. b
ii Maj ,..i...... ......i..{s...F.s,. III
r ] Wilson witness fees state VS.
James Holmes ~. ~
James Turcott witness fees, state w
{ Reynolds justice fees state vs. Is
J ! Keynolds 4 Justice fees. !. state Us $
oscar Houske Witness fees, state vs.
cb hsge a Vredy witness fees state IS =
Hattie zacharias II
Al M Bedding witness fees, state VS.
James Holmes 49,, p. ~ q IL
Adolph Hacharias witness fees. state
VS. UnReman. ~. ,......5.. 1855. w
August Zacharias witness fees, state
VS. jacob -Ungemar 49,, .........f..3E 16
] n Martin justice fees, state VS. jacob IS
= M Martin Justice fees, state vs. Mar
| tin Nelson ct. al Z, Observation-Disclosures. 400
J NJ Martin justice fees, state vs. Mrs
# Hoover Is W
| j NJ Martin Justice fees, siate vs. Pal .
MuTDhy Il. i. . Az
j N Martin justice fees, state Us WE
] NJ Martin Justice fees, state VS. Il Y
Chatten Y. 4. n, Az. 4 as
j NJ Martin justice fees, state vs. VIII
liam Oliver ct al... 40
Major ct al. .s............. 8 95
] NJ Martin justice fees, state VS. Sam
Sargent ~. ......... ~. .s............ 70
M IT TIE nacSarias - - 4 IA
| r M Martin 9'instice fees tstate es trhos
NeWhy VI gFz y. 49,. A AZ
Me Marlin i,itee fees state vs. Lille 2
Snhat ~ III f'>'- $500 - a "a
| r ~ Hazen constnhle fees state VS.
a,hert < ih,n ~ 49, 405
j " Hazen constable fees, state vs. 6
| CSaries C,nstnfson iustice fees. state
n CsJ mnton o th bin 81 the village Of Deer
inf
R anton ~ spsoner ehaftn
was ms a ,nnton the Following claims were Al.
i ( NJ Rae,,sv ,aktns srna,nox nat,ents
: * ,,ssf ho,,se II i = t',s"..s q 0k1
n, ~ ~ r y Sn,nars f.vrenses in n,,aran