The Denison review. [volume] (Denison, Iowa) 1867-current, 1902-06-13

upon by Toastmaster Rhodenbaugh
were DR.. j. W. Bissell, DR.. E. NJ.
Holmes, Miss Vida Smith, Prof j. d.
Martin, Pres. w c. Van Ness, MIR. e.
Gulick and Mr. G. Hardy, whose re-
turn from his victorious career in the
South Dakota University is hailed with
delight by all the old D. N. G. students.
congratulate the new graduates and
we wish again to commend the work of
the college and the indefatigable energy
with which it has kept up its standing
in spite of adyersities. Our people are
perhaps inclined to underestimate the
benefits of the college to Denison but if
it We're gone we would miss large part
of that which makes. Denison model
home for rich and poor alike. All Hail
Denison College, may it grow and pros
per and may its graduates ever be as
promising, as intelligent and as we'll
equipped for lifes battle as the class of
1902
The REVIEW declines to give aid to
the Bulletin in its effort to promote
factional strife among the republicans
of this county. We do not wonder at
the course Of the Bulletin, it is con-
sidered good politics to encourage
every evidence of discord in the ranks
of the opposition. Had the REVIEW
been on the opposite side of the matter
in the late convention the Bulletin
would have been just as anxious in its
support of the opposition to the Re-
VIEW as it now is in behalf of Judge
Elwood. The republicans OF this coun-
ty are too shrewd not to see through
this very self-evident and forced effort
of the Bulletin. not to espouse the
cause OF any particular nan, but if
possible to stir up and perpetuate strife
in republican ranks.
Naturally again the Bulletin wishes
to single out the editor of the REVIEW
as the point OF attack. In fact there
might be mentioned among the repub
licans of Denison who took an active
part in the support of the Crawford
county policy, such men as Sears Nc.
Henry. W. T. Wright, T. j. Garrison.
E. Gulick, A. Wright, p. E. @. Lally,
| w. j. SERVER, DR.. J. I. Gibson, U. G
johnson, B. Y. Nicholson, w. M.
McLennan, John Klinker, Geo. Naeye.
| W. j. McAhren, M. e. Jones and very
many others. These were buta few OF
the workers in Denison. Surelydtcan-
not be charged that auch men as these
were either hoodwinked or sand
bagged by the REVIEW. Throughout
the county the same condition existed.
| Among the representative republi-
cans outside of Denison were such
names as F. j. Gary of West Side
VIM Sleeves and Fred Smith of Stock
holm, Jas. Maynard and r. j. Dieter
OF jackson, W. 7. Tuckstep and other:
of Milford, E. K. Smell of Goodrich
4 j. c. Saul, w. B Evans and others o
Paradise. j. H. Brocklesby of Hays
S. e. Whelcher and E. Hathaway O
Iowa, T. P. Black Geo Rae and S. ]
Woodruff of Union, and all of the larg,
delegation form Union township. II
fact should we attempt to give tn
names of those who favored this polio,
we should be forced to name more thai
three-fourths of the Representative
republicans of Crawford. Simply tn
naming of such men is a sufiicien
answer to all charges of bossism, O
J clubbing or of underhanded methods
These are men who are accustomed t
think for themselves and he would b
a very bold, incautious and self con
ceited mar who would attempt to appea
to them by anything else than tn
light of reason.
The issue was fairly presented an
fairly met and by three-fourths vot
of all the precincts represented it wa
+decided as it was Had it been other
wise decided the names of such men a
Sears McHenry, w. T. Wright, p, Z
G. Lally and others would not hav
been upon the list as delegates. Th
majority simply exercised the righ
that all majorities exercise, be they re
publican or democratic, to send a
representatives those who would carr
out the wishes of the majority. TIL
REVIEW has no aDolopies to offer fo