The Nome nugget., 1902-05-28
SUr1rICNS FOR PUBLICATION.

In tho United States Distric1 Court fer the
 District of Alaska, Second Division
 Action brought in the District Court for the District of AlasI,u, Second Division. and the complaint ard the amended comrlaiMt there in filed in the office of the clcrl. thereof at Nome, District of Alaska.
 Constantine podhor,l;i and A l. Brandcr. plaintiffs, VS. Charles F. Schneider. I"hn F. Drake r.. r. Harlow, and John Doe HAd Richard Roe CNhoS" true names are unknownl. dcicnd- ants.
 Thc President of the United states Of America to thar.c, Y 'thut der. John F. Drake. r.. F. Harlow, u.4 JoAu Doe and Richard Roe (whose
 You and each of you arc hereby rutltic 10 an. pear and answer the amcnd'd complaint filed pY tt' plaintiffs in the above entitled 'ctuu iu the DiSlric' Court for th" District uf A.aslla Second Division. at Nulnr. N4~ila. within thirty t5U) day from tn" date ui NcjN ice on Auu of this summons, or judgment tor want thereof brought by the plaintiffs ag1in>. tn" dvfcudJlt- to settle and drtcrmin" the adverse cl1im~ cf the plaintiffs and defendants tu the following , described mining claims. lands and lrc1Ii-c~:
 The snow Flake .luiH mirin@ claim; Helen lode quartz claim: quartz claim known aS the cXtcnsion of the Hudson quartz !od" claim: placer claims No 10 abOy discovery Oil Arctic creek. q tributary of kpu%arul river upper discovery on Belt creek tributary of kuSu trleln rtEef; No 10 on ArlHona c'cck' q uihli- tury of kouehruk river; No. Y on North Fork. a tributary of l<Ougaroll river; No. li below ou Kou2arOli river No. lp below on Yellowstone river: No. below on Willow creek: No. , above
 
 discovery on Quart tz creek; No. 1 on ludCpCnd- cncc creek: No , ou right fork Of e IartI creek: lower half of No. on ,1uartz crock; No. 1 on Dahl creek; No above discovery on right fork Of Harris rrc,.: No. , Ol Magnet gulch: No. :: on Taylor creek: No. uu Soicnon creek; No. l5 on Coarse Gold creek; No. ii -On kougaroli river below middle discovery: b"nch claim No. 10. opposite No. 10 crC"!, claim on the southeast side of Dahl creek; No. 5 on Quartz CT, elk; so. on Quartz creek: No. 6 on CuHrt2 creek: No. below Nelson discovery on kouParol river; No. above discovery on Farmer creek; diScOF- cry on l5uidy creek: No II on Alder creek Nn. above upper discovery on Coffee creek u tlb. utary of C IartZ creek: No. 2 on Stone gJch. d ui1utGry of Harris creek; undivided Uuc-haIf ul bench ClGinH No. 2 above upper discovery on c Hrtz creek, right limit opposite NO. 2 creek cIllm; undivided one half Oi bench claim 0ppo- sit" No. 1 on tn" south Sd3 oi Iurry cfcc..; UI- divided one half of bench Giui,n Nu. 1 below tlc upper diHcoV"rS oil the cast side tt (tIartl t.rri: undivided Onu-hG.f Of bench claim No. 1 above the upper discovery on Carry creek. All the above named in the l[ougIrOt recording district, Second division. District of Alaska. Also thoN" ccrtnin mining claims lands and premises situated in the PO"g Clarence rcCOrG- ing district, District of Alaska, described nS fol- lows: Placer claims No. , above discovery uu Mckinley creek situated at the head of Grant Icy hafb Dor; No. below on Last Chance creek; No above on Quartz gulch. and No. above discovery or Fox creek Also those certain mining claims, lands and premises situated in the Three Rock mining district District of Alaska, as follows. Placer claims No. on Macadamized creek; No. above discovery on
 
 Willow creek; No. on Quartz creek; also an undivided onc-half of lot No. 10 in block in Port Clarence City. District of Alaska; also an undivided one-half of No extension of the Hudson quartz ledge, on the cast Side of Quurtz creek
 And the relief demanded in the amended com plaint k that pending the determination of this action the defendants and all parties to this action be cnjoncd from mining upon tracing gold or gold dust from the mining claims and premises above described, and that upon the inul tcaring said !niuncton be made perpetual against dcfcndantS Schneider. DraltC, John Doe and Richard Roe; also thGt the snid defendants and each of them be required to set forth the nature of their claims to said Goove described mining claims and promises, and that all claims adverse to the plaintiffs be luieted and determined by decree of this court; that the defendants Schneider, Drake. John Doe and Richard Roe be aCj ldgcd to have no estate interest whatsoever in the said above described mining claims and premises or any part thereof and that tEe title of the plaintl..S thereto is valid and paramount; that the defendants Schneider. Drake. John Doe C.}l Richard Roe and each Of them be forever blrred from assert ing any claim to said land and premises any part thereof adverse to the t.2imS of the plain tiiiS that plaintiffs recover costs and diSburSe mentS and general relief The defendants John Doe and kichurd Roe are alleged in said amend cd complaint to De fictitious names of tI fcnd ants, whose true names are unknown to the plaintiffs and plaintiffs in said amended com plaint pray that when aScertlined their true names bc inserted and all proceedings amended nccounrl;. It IS also alleged in tho said amended complaint thIt plainti1 Podhorsld is thc owner If an undivided onc-hulI interest in said mini claims and premises: thd. p.lintf Brandcr is .Le owner of un undivided Cne-foIrth interest therein, and that the defendant l.. E.