Ottumwa semi-weekly courier. [volume] (Ottumwa, Iowa) 1899-1903, 1902-10-23

per cent from September 10, 1899, CIV
en- to plaintiff by defendant. Keota
w. Williams, attorney for plaintiff
w. w. Dunning VS. Ida D. Dunning,
petition for divorce. Plaintiff states
that. he and the defendant were mar
ried February 10, 1901, Plaintiff
charges defendant with adultery, cruel
and inhuman treatment and desertion.
w. w. Epps is attorney for plaintiff.
Edward Mosher VS. Amanda Mosher,
petition for divorce. Plaintiff states
that he was married to the defendant
in Ottumwa, September 2, 1896 De-
PENDANT is charged with habitual
drunkenness. F. G. Orelup is attor--
ney for plaintiff.
Grace D. Fitzgerald VS. James Fitz--
gerald, petition for divorce. Plaintiff
states that she and the defendant were
married in Ottumwa November 10.
1894. and that one child has been born
to them, Agnes Mary Fitzgerald.
now six years of age.
She charges that the defendant de-
serted her and asks for the custody
of the child. Steck & Smith, at
torneys for plaintiff.
Mrs. M. b. Judson VS. J. E. Judson,
petition for divorce. Plaintiff states
that she and the defendant were mar
ried in this city, March A. 1901. and
that the defendant has been guilty of
cruel and inhuman treatment Sen
eca Cornell is attorney for the plain
tiff.
Myrta Enyart VS. H. D. Enyart, petit
ton for divorce. Plaintiff states that
she and the defendant were married in
Wapello county October II, 1899, and
she charges the defendant with cruel
and inhuman treatment and desertion.
Williams & Williams, attorneys for the
plaintiff.
George w. Blair VS. Mahala T. Ian.
ming ct al, petition to quiet title on the
following real estate: Southeast quar-
ter of the southeast quarter. and the
east half of the northwest quarter of
the southeast quarter of section "a, al
so the northeast quarter of the south
east quarter and the west half of the
southwest quarter of the southeast
quarter and east half of the southwest
quarter and the southwest quarter of
the southwest quarter and the south
Ia acres of the northwest quarter of
the southwest quarter of section 3S,
all in township 70. range 10, except
25.07 acres of said land conveyed by
D. A. LaForce and wife to the c.. B. &,
@. Railway company for right-of-way
purposes. McElroy &, McElroy attor.
neys for plaintiff.
Mary En11i1ou Job,, WY vy;o1al
ct al. petition to quiet title on the fol
lowing real estate situated in Wapello
county: The west half and the south
half CT the east half of lot 40 of Co.
vans subdivision and part of the
northwest quarter of the southwest
quarter Of section 35, township 70,
range IA, except 25 feet off south end
of said lot Sumner Siberell attorney
for plaintiff
M. A. Thomas ct al, VS. J. NJ Crager.
petition to quiet title on the follow
ing real estate situated in Wapello
county: The north half of the north
west quarter and the southwest half
of the northwest quarter, section 26.
township II, north, range 10 west.
Seneca Cornell attorney for plaintiff.
u. I. Knight VS.. J. Jacton and WapeL
10 county, Iowa, petition to establish
boundry line in section IS, township
rs range II west, Wapello county,
Iowa. Plaintiff asks that the center
section line and the north and south
quarter section line in section 13 be
established and the boundaries of the
public highway east and west and
north and south in said section be de-
tarn1innfi g.
for plaintiff.
Ida j. Shepherd vs. Catherine G. Fos-
ter, ct al. petition to quiet title on the
following property: Sixty feet off the
northeast end of the southeast 40 feet
of lot 275, block 100. original plat of the
city of Ottumwa. McElroy & McEl-
roy, attorneys for plaintiff.
John H. Spry, ct al, VS. Lewis CASA,
ct al, petition to quiet title to certain
real estate situated in section 20, town
ship Y, north range 10 west in Wap-
clio county, Iowa. Seneca Cornell, at
torney for plaintiffs.
S. l.. McGavic VS.. Ed Nelson ct al
petition in equity Plaintiff asks for
judgment against the defendants in
the sum Of $G55.36 with interest and
SoStS NCNGlI O. IlSudlS. attorneys
for plaintiff.
A. B. Williams VS.. Albert Watts, peti
ton in equity. Suit on note for $500,
alleged to have been given by defend.
ants to plaintiff September 3, 1899.
Keota nj. Williams, attorney for plain
tiff
w. B. Armstrong VS.. Guy N. Warner
and Juliet Warner. foreclosure on note
for $3.50, said to have been given by
defendant to plaintiff. A. w. Enoch
attorney for plaintiff
S. ID. Baker and Sumner Siberel,, eX-
ecutors, etc, VS.. Mary M. Bradley, ct
al. petition to foreclose five promissory
notes for 500 each, with Interest at 4
per cent.
Peoples Building and Saving asso-
citation VS.. d. d. Smith, ct al, foreclos-
ure on mortgage in the sum of $3.50
d. A. Emery. attorney for plaintiff.
Mrs. Geo. Bennett VS.. Warren Ham
ilton, ct al petition in equity to cancel
real estate and secure attorney pur.
chase money.
Edward Howard VS. Oren Honn, Ell
al, petition in equity. Plaintiff asks
for equitable division of property OF
the late Henry Honn. Gilmore &
Moon, attorneys for plaintiff.