Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1902-06-04
|0Id Shuu Is
| Being 7hreshed
.ns ATTORNEYS Go Over The Same GSound 0Nanp
qmes--Faa SgnaAy 70 Cloud Romnep's Testimony,
wsi,b Stands Practically Unchanged What Prisones
r,,5 Witness About Money in hee Cellar

ur stewart kept UP u lusi''''O
~ ~ a,estlons put in such man
apu make It almost impossible for
q , " 10 reply intelligently TO
''y y, stevarts segregation OF the
Su' ' S Of the modus operandl
's . s. On, the receipt at the lumber
gs office and his framing OF
g s'n. covering each minor detail OF
',,.,etlon, was very clever ana
p,c.n the witness would make K, , re-,
ri ,,,t would seemingly contradict
,s Y he h had made, this result was
coon TO come from the manner
aug aiming and had absolutely no
IMAM Inc spectators. The effort to
~ ,,s witness straightforward
nra which was, OF course, I'M
y" ,,.1 No ali TO be a part Of the bust
.,sef me defense) was plainly appar.
N listeners. When 1t was patent
y ,AS witness hestated TO reply be-
s' ~ dld not want to corroDorate
sa@ aI,statements. and desired to ex-
, .is Imsef he was unceremoniously
s' ~ Win 1--WE don't want any ex-
as,ton we simply want an answer 70
y. positions" Mr. Stewards cross
ssr'atlon Of Mr. Romney went INTO
sis ,ys,ter Of making out the receipt,
"a u, vS'l was said during that time, to
4 ,rs., gpeth, the ground being gone
ana over again In almost exhaust
ips rsilton. but the story OF the VII
,es, remained mistaken.
Il Csmlng 10 the point where Mr.. Rom
tey ma Hay and the defendant walked
I'm south Temple street to the Valley
Hon corner Mr.. Stewart asked
"A 'sTbsre Is a saloon at that corner, isn't
HheNF
n Yes sr."
81 good many people 90 struggling
around there. don't they"
ri oPsrhaps didn't notice them"
n aWhs YOU were coming up the street
L M you mention the money transaction
Ia dll'
n 10 not that remember; not after
DfMng the office"
IA You left Mr. Hay and Mr.. Morten-
Eten standing on that cornerY'
"a No, sir, they were near the middle Of
||iNe street, waiting for an approaching
Ma"
4 Mr.. Romney again related all the
Happenings Of Tuesday morning and the
sate Of his feelings upon receiving the
tAephOne message from the defendant
tssag Il he had seen Mr., Hay. Not
gisalding the fact that the witness
BAL ven IN the witness box all day
)cg he Nit an even and unrufiied tenn
fef and patiently answered the ques-
,iors With fairness and truthfulness,
tliAflsA he was required to go over the
frcEM % many times. He was still
~ III stand when court adjourned till
thi nHng.
W George f. Romney was again in
'h Elness box this morning after the
opHhg Of the third district criminal
fcT Hon c. W, Morse, Judge.
w Romney may take the stand"
~ come TO be familiar expression
nm he court and on account of the
t'lol'ness Of the lengthy cross-exam-
lAuoh Of the witness the attendance
"ult lnis morning was meager. in
us ordinary course OF events Il Is quite
,.sV mat Mr c. B. Stewart would
~ leIleyed ms brother in putting
ue questions In cross examination. but
,ls lae' mat the witness and Mr.. c. f..
sssaH Of counsel for the defense were
n9usls.ln-law constituted in the
nilN q spectators a reason for the
VeOlaaIy course being departed from.
hAeIfing to the time Immediately
sas"Nng The moment when Mr.. James
.-Ip lad communicated TO the witness
shpelon that Mortensen may have
lsel Implicated in the disappearance
NV, W 'ecedent, Mr.. Barnard Stewart
~ you nave a suspicion that Nor
ul'a was implicated in the disap-
Ensshee OF Mr. Hay?"
M komney attempted 10 explain
n.y. y could scarcely say that he had
Suspicion Of the defendant but that
... soil OF bewldered thought had
'. his mind, which constantly
ny struggle In his mind in many
,s ~ssul ways, and that he was con-
|sss,.ss having new thoughts and
M "a, iaeas, The result OF all this
|ri,, ,.s' ue, al that time, had no fixed
III, gS,0n Of suspicion and didn't know
~ stewart would brook no explana-
= ~ however and demanded an answer
} !, s. n.y. " no. Mr. Romney was 10th TO
o,Ss ael 10 That way to this and many
IA, q, s 0Hh questions, for neither yes"
y, , ~ would have conveyed the ex-
n \ huuNn The witness was dlsinollned
ma, ',e Ar' Stewart state proposition
,Trs, sSs partially correct and partially
insvs- go - ana then TO be required to
rjssr. yes or mo- to the question.
9orsaaA IN an effort TO explain Mr.
n, D ~ continued to talk In spite OF
- au s,vsWarts objection.
vel wait 2 minute; wait. we don,t
,op sany tnlng but a direct answer
sn', sll' homney, wait a minute. we
n s senl any explanationl" exclaimed
.icbssS,' n s! words interrupted Mr..
.y wv they don't want the facts"
>, IVY ", honor' and Mr. Barnard stew-
Ne Ss as upon his feet in an instant:
h ~ ,s,ie mere 10 save an exception to
gtlos MARKS OF counsel for the prose-
N ~ Morse said the remark must 90
.on s' ule record and Mr.. C. r. Stewart
,cordI, ,s tne court TO instruct the Jury
os SasA'sielnen OF the jury" said his
~ as ! have instructed Won he
AZ: ~ are to take no notice OF re-
fs ~ counsel between themselves
m aay proceed Mr.. stewart
~ audience. which had nv this
ter,s,sS little larger, was much
ste's y, IN the INT between The
Dds,, ',olney and counsel for the de-
am az indicating that every tech
L dsf.rn " he taken advantage Of by
,ora 9 w ,ssrt read lengthiiy from The
eiGcsn,n we preliminary examination,
Zen 1v nom the testimony there
p Of bi, %r. ihomney as TO the prac.
sy IN ,h.sslt and the late James n.
! co ,r wen business transactions for
llg hsir,"n After having read prob
ave., hundred questions ana Tho
Now W. efs.o, Mr. Stewart asked
yitet j. TO- 'n's testimony is
,e t,. Ssnoor objected to this whole
s' and taxing the memory