The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1902-10-08
HIGHER COURTS RECORD.
SUPREME COURT.

eS&
1850. Parks VS.. State of Indiana Law
renee G. c.. Affirmed. Gillett, il. An
affidavit and information Is sufficient TO
withstand a motion to uuash IL IL charges
the ofense in the language of the statute,
or In terms substantially equivalent thereto.
2. When there Is a good count and a bad
SEunt of ln guilty. ah ,nf Is returne ana on ws WHICH, jud is-
ment Is rendered, II will be presumed on
appeal that the judgment was rendered on
the good count. g. Sections ISlS-.SzS e.
medicine do not conflict with federal Con-
stitution, and a person practicing mag
netic healing is subject to such statute.
4. If a person holds himself out to the COM
munity as a person skilled in the science of
healing and on that grounds seeks the OPP
portunity to exercise the skill he claims to
possess, his business becomes impressed
with a public character, and he Is subject
to reasonable regulation in it's prosecution.
5. The Legislature is the proper tribunal to
determine the degree or learning a person
shall possess who gains a livelihood by
seeking to relieve the bodily ailments of
others.
ex rel. Upton c. c.. Affirmed. Monks. j.
/. A railroad company may be compelled,
by mandamus proceedings, to lower its
tracks so as to conform with the grade of
street crossings in a city. 2. Motions to
modify, strike out or add to the special
ndings are not recognized by our code
found are not sustained by the evidence.
or are contrary to law. or where facts
should have been found but were not, the
proper remedy is by a motion for a new
trial. 4. The correctness of conclusions or
law cannot be questioned by a motion to
modify the Judgment.
1851. Place VS.. Baugher. st. Joseph c. c.
Affirmed. Jordan, il. Where a person
copies entries, made by himself. into an
other book and ~testifes they are correct he
may afterward refer to the book or read
therefrom in giving testimony. 2. A 1udg-
ment will not be reversed on account Of an
error which is harmless.
1888. Davis VS.. Chase. White c.. c. Man.
date modified per curtain.
1909. Hogan VS.. City of indianapolis.
Marion 5. G. Cause advanced.
1881. Kreuter VS.. English. etc, Co. Starke
G. G. Petition to advance overruled-
1914. Ruby VS.. Haugh. Randolph C.. C.
Motion to strike out names of part Of ap-
pellants postponed until final hearing.
1879. Drew VS.. Town of Geneva. Jay c.
e.. Leave granted appellee to file brief.
1892. Street VS.. varney. ETC.. Co.. Wayne
C.. c.. Leave granted to index transcript.
1886. johnson VS.. johnson. Huntington
&C. Transferred to Appellate Court.
1883. Malott, rec, VS.. Hawkins. Marion
s. c: Transferred to Appellate Court.
Hammond isnaSi d. 4 Lake Z; G 9. e e. r Fra Gsi VS.; city TT a OF
pellate Court.
1886. Callerson VS.. Bradley. Bartholo-
NEW G. c; Transferred to Appellate Court.
1883. Bistine VS.. Clements. Montgomery
C.. G.. Transferred to Appellate Court.
1876. Chappell VS.. Jasper. etc, Co. Jas
per c. C.: Transferred to Appellate Court.
StuO otOllC W. I. oldkkc. NICtHC -. -.
Transferred to Appellate Court.
1916. Brown VS.. White. Marion s. C.
Transferred to Appellate Court.
1877. Thistlethwaite VS.. Pierce. Hamil-
ton G. c.. Transferred to Appellate Court.
1888. Rich VS.. E. & T. II. r. r. Co. Sui
Ivan c. G. Transferred to Appellate Court.
1882. G: & s. E. Ry. Co. vs. Kenney.
Clay c. c. Agreement for cancellation of
1929. Wabash r.. R. Co. VS.. c. r. & NJ.
r. r. Miami c. c. Leave granted appel
liant to file brief.
1883. Clinton Whistler VS.. David Whistler.
Grant c. c. Record. assignment OF errors,
Joinders CD by Whistler ct al. Lumaru, exr.
Minutes
1857. William Drew VS.. The Town of
Genoa. Jay c: c.. Appellee granted leave
to file brief. Apellee's brief Isl
1892. Frank l.. STREET VS.. The varney
Electrical Company. Wayne G. c. Appel
lee granted leave to file affidavit and amend
brief.
APPELLATE COURT.
zoos. Everitt VS.. Everitt. Clark c. c..
Affirmed. Comstock, jim a habeas corpus
proceeding wherein one parent seeks to
recover from the other possession Of their
child the decision therein can be conclusive
only in respect to the facts and circum-
stances then existing and not az TO such as
may arise afterward in a divorce proceed
ing between the parties.
4175. Indianapolis st. Ry. Co. VS.. Kelly.
Hancock c. c.. Dismissed.
1856. Terhune VS.. Shinn. Henry c. C.
Dismissed.
1921. Mickey VS.. Zonker. steuben c. C.
| Certiorari granted and issued.
4467. Williams vs.. Manley. Jay G. e. Pub
| lication granted and issued.
4257. Stuckwisch VS.. Holmes. Marion G..
G. Reversed. Wiley. G. jim an action
by a creditor to set aside a conveyance OF
! his debtor as fraudulent IL should be al