Ottumwa semi-weekly courier. [volume] (Ottumwa, Iowa) 1899-1903, 1902-10-23


o l.. Campbell Plaintiff claims de-
PENDANT is indebted to them in the sum
of $685. account for merchandise.
George F. Heindel, attorney for plain
tiff
NJ Bassinger VS.. c.. B. & @. Railway
Co.. suit for damages. Plaintiff asks
for judgment in sum of $69.4S4 and
costs OF suit, for the alleged failure of
defendants to deliver carload of
sheep in Chicago at the time agreed
upon. w. r. Nelson, attorney for
plaintiff.
Geo. w. Harlan VS.. Ottumwa Trac-
ton & Light Co., suit for damages.
Plaintiff asks judgment for $500 and
costs OF suit for injuries received on
July 4, 1902. G. w. Whitmore. attor.
ney for plaintiff.
U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. VS.. G.
G. DuBose, petition at law. Plaintiff
asks Judgment against defendant in
the sum of 81, 659.15, with interest and
costs of suit. which amount they allege
is due them through the embezzlement
of said amount by defendant Gilmore
& Moon, attorneys for plaintiff.
M. j. Whelan VS.. D. A. Jay and j. Ed
Trott, suit on note for sum of $500,
given by the defendants October II,
1901. Plaintiff demands that defend
ants pay st. Patrick's Catholic church
the donation agreed upon. Gilmore
& Moon, attorneys for plaintiff.
Langsdorf-Byers Jewelry Co. VS.. ].
A. Healy. petition at law. Plaintiffs
state that they employed defendant
as travelling salesman and that he was
overpaid in the sum of S139.40. PLAIN
tiffs ask Judgment to recover said son.
Heindel & Weber.
chancery.
In the chancery docket sixteen d.
vorces are included. The number of
divorce cases for the october term
are not so numerous as in the August
term.
Charles w. Caster VS. Laura A. Cas-
ter, petition for divorce. Plaintiff
states that he and the defendant were
married in Ottumwa, February 2, 1901.
Plaintiff charges defendant with a1ul-
terry with one Lewis Knapp and 9TH
erS.
David c. Ward VS. Margaret Ward,
petition for divorce. Plaintiff states
that he and the defendant were mar
ried April "a. 1901. Plaintiff states
that he is rs years of age and charges
the defendant with cruel and inhuman
treatment. Plaintiff further states
that he owns certain property in Kirk
vile and asks that property rights to
portion of said land be relinquished.
Jaques & Jaques are attorneys for the
plaintiff.
Maggie Appleby VS.. VIM Appleby,
petition for divorce. Plaintiff states
that she and the defendant were mar
ried at Mystic, December 25, 1890.
One son has been born to them, Clar-
ence Appleby, aged IL years. Plain
tiff charges defendant with habitual
drunkenness and asks for custody of
minor child.
Flora B. Reddick vs. Morrison Red
dick, petition for divorce. Plaintiff
states that she and the defendant
were married January Is, 1896, that
there has been born to them one girl
child, aged years, named Hildred.
Plaintiff charges defendant with cruel
and inhuman treatment and asks Gus
tody of minor child Jacques G Ja--
ques are attorneys for plaintiff.
Myrtle Rink VS. Charles Rink. petit
liOJ lOl ulNUlCc.U I ldiuIlll STATES lUdJ
she and the defendant were married
at Davenport March IA. 1899. She
charges the defendant with desertion.
B. w. Scott, attorney for plaintiff.
|. James f. Smith VS. Emma Smith,
petition for divorce. Plaintiff states
that she and the defendant were mar
ried in Ottumwa August 10, 1890. De
PENDANT is charged with desertion.
w. w. Epps is attorney for plaintiff
Maggie e. Smith VS. A. B. Smith,
petition for divorce. One child has
been born to them, Harry A. Smith,
aged three years. Defendant is charg-
ed with cruel and inhuman treatment,
also charged with non-support and
adultery. Plaintiff asks custody of
minor child. w. w. Epps, attorney
for plaintiff.
Mary e. Summers VS.. Emmett Sum
mers, petition for divorce. Plaintiff
states that she and the defendant were
married February H. 1891, in Macon
county, Mo. Defendant is charged
with desertion and non-support and
cruel and inhuman treatment. Plain,
tiff asks for custody of minor child,
| Opal Drew Summers, 9 years of age
| Vi Sldid HIllIlL vs. JdulGS JIllllIU,
| petition for divorce Plaintiff states
| that she and the defendant were mar
| ried at Rockwell City, January 16
| 1900. Defendant is charged with cruel
and inhuman treatment Plaintiff asks
custody of minor son, Victor, aged one
year. HI. l.. Manion is attorney fol-
| the plaintiff.
Belle Neff VS. Loren Neff, petition
for divorce. Plaintiff states that she
! and the defendant were married at OF
tumwa January "a, 1893. She charges
defendant with cruel and inhumat
| treatment, asks for permanent ali
mony in the sum Of $3.50 and asks tt
be allowed $25 for attorneys fees. E
! X. Daugnerty is attorney for the plain
i tiff.
/ Sarah Sargent VS. Elijah Sargent
petition for divorce. Plaintiff statei
that she and the defendant were mar
!. ried November 9, 1893 at Keb. De.
4 PENDANT is charged with cruel and in,
human treatment B. w. Scott is at
+. torney for the plaintiff,
A. B. Williams We. Albert Watts, pc
i tition in equity. Proceedings to col
lect note of $500 with intstest at