The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1901-02-01
SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING
County, State of Washington. George
T. Sampson, plaintiff, VS.. Henry E. Kel-
ssey, Helen W. Kelsey, James Nc
Naught, Jane Doe Mcknight, his wife;
J; W. Edwards, Elizabeth Edwards and
T. {. Neufelder, defendants. No. -.
Summons for Publication.
The State of Washington to the said
Henry E. Kelsey, Helen w. kelsey,
James Mcknight and Jane Doe Nc
Naught, his wife (whose true given name
is to the plaintiff unknown):
You and each of you are hereby sum
moned to appear within sixty 600 days
AFTER the date of the first publication of
this summons, to-wit: within sixty (6O)
and defend the above entitled action in
the above entitled court, and answer the
complaint of the plaintiff and serve a
copy OF your said answer upon the under
signed attorneys for the plaintiff at their
o..ce below stated, and in case of your
failure so to do Judgment will be rendered
against you according to the demand of
the complaint, which will be filed with the
clerk of the said court.
Said action is brought and it's objects
are:
d To recover judgment against the de-
PENDANT Henry E. kelsey in the sum of
five thousand dollars ($5 OOOOO with
twelve Q2) per cent. interest thereon from
January l. 1895, computed semi-annuaIIy
together with an attorneys fee of ten per
cent OF the total amount found due, and
plaintiffs costs and disbursements herein.
the said Judgment to bear twelve Q2) per
cent interest, upon that certain mort
gage bond executed by the said Henry E.
Kelsey to the Lombard Investment Com
pany on December Is, 1889, dated Deem
Der %, 1882 and due January l. 1895. with
SIX 20 per cent. interest until maturity.
payable July and January l of each YEAR
evidenced by coupon notes originally at
tached to the said bond, and twelve 02)
per cent. interest after default, said bond
ana the mortgage securing it having been
sold and assigned to the plaintiff
~ To fOrecIose the lien of that certain
mortgage given by the said Kelsey, then
unmarried, to secure the payment Of the
SAID bond according to it's terms, which
mortgage was recorded on December %
1889, in Volume As of Mortgages, at page
IA, of the records of King County. Wash
lngton, and covers the following describ-
ed real property situated in King County,
Washington:
The northeast quarter On. E. ~ of sec
ton tWenty-seven (2O, the west half of
the northwest quarter CIV. u of N. W. "a
OF section tWenty-Six (26) and the south
west quarter of the southeast quarter Is
w. "A of S. E. "a of section TWENTY-FIVE
(22), all in township twenty-six (26) north
range fYe % east, w. M. containing in
all two hundred eighty (2o0) acres
90 To have the mortgaged premises
sold and conveyed under foreclosure by
the sheriff of King County, according to
law, and the net proceeds thereof apnIted
upon the said judgment.
"a 10 bar and fOreclose the defendants
above named and each Of them, and ali
persons claiming under them or any of
thenl' OF ana from all interest in and right
to the said premises, excepting the right
OF redemption provided by law
(5) 10 obtain any other and further re-
neL IN the premises that may be just and
equitable.
SHANK & SMITH,
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PostOffice Address: 524-5-6 Bailey Build |
ing, Seattle, Washington
First Dubica tiOn Ilecenn her Ii 1onn