The San Francisco call. [volume] (San Francisco [Calif.]) 1895-1913, 1901-11-16
I OLIVE GRUVER
IN COURT AGAIN
Plaintiff in Two Divorce
Suits in Three
Weeks.
DR.. A. <. Happersberger De-
MES That He Treated
Wife Cruelty.

Olive F. Gruver has had her choice of
TWO husbands and neither one of the two
gentlemen have suited Strange to relate
Mrs. Gruver did not suit either one of
her husbands, for they both deserted her.
Stranger still, however, is the story of
Mrs. Gruver's matrimonial experiences.
Edwin NJ Carson was her first choice and
she was married TO him in Oakland in
the early nineties. They lived together
for some years and then Carson disap-
peaceo- He had been gone for some time
ana she heard that he was dead. She
met William +. Gruver and after a short
courtShlp they were married. They lived
happily Tor a year and then one day Car
son. her former husband, whom she sup
posed was not in the land OF the living,
appeared.
Two weeks ago the woman with too
many husbands brought suit for divorce.
ana by decree Of court was freed from
her first husband. Carson disposed Of
this time for good so far as any claim he
might have upon her was concerned, she
set about getting rid of husband No. 2
and yesterday filed a suit for divorce
against Gruver, alleging in her complaint
tnat ne oesel ted her in August, 1887.
Happersberger Denies Charges.
Dr. Albert X HoDpersberger hled an
answer 10 his wifes complaint for divorce
yesterday in which he denies every ale
cation or cruelty made by his spouse. The
OOctOr claims he never beat Mrs. Hap
persberger aud denies her charge that he
ever ordered her out OF the house. He
claims also that he has given every at
tenJiOn that loving husband should law
ISL on a wife, and that he has always
supported her. He says he is not worth
S2J,O0 and that his income from his prac-
tlce is only 1920 instead Of $4,000 as she
claims. He also says that his wife is not
IN need Of alimOny while the suit is pend
ing, as she has been supported by Ben
1anln {. Moore, a son by a former mar
rage, since the suit was filed.
Mark j. Garlick wants his marriage t.
Gertrude E. Garlick annulled. He alleges
in the complaint he filed yesterday that
ms was an illegal marriage because he
contracted the marriage one week after
Mrs Garlick had secured q divorce from
George 2 Miller. He still further alleges
that at the time he made Mrs Miller Mrs.
Garlick he was under the age of q years.
They were married in October 1901.
Denies That She Drinks.
Alice Edith Randall filed an answer TO
the cross-eOmplaint filed by Charles Z. S.
Randall in the divorce proceedings insti-
rutec by Mrs Randall some weeks ago
Mrs Randall. who was accused by her
husband Of INDUCING in intoXicants to
such an extent that it frequently hap
pened that she had 10 be carried home
denies the charges. She claims that she
never drank two dozen quart bottles Of
beer or three pint TASKS of whisky in
one evening, or that she ever got so in
loKlcateo that she had TO be undressed
and put TO bed.
Hugo Abraham Bernstein, in a suit for
annulment OF marriage filed yesterday. al
legeS that since his marriage TO Sarah
Bernstein in June Of last year he learned
that she was Of feeble and unsound mind.
He asks for the custody OF a months old
chil3, the issue of the marriage
divorces were granted yesterday to
Aimee Burlingame from James Bur
ling2me for desertiOn. Louisa George from
Zachary T George for desertion and Ada
ton.
Suits for divorce were filed by Mary
Christina Simpson against, John Simpson
Tor cruelty Richard B. Seike against
Agnes Seike for desertion, Mary Keen
against Charles Keen FOR failure 10 pro-
vide and Luella n. Butler against c. w.
Butler for cruelty