The daily morning journal and courier., 1901-07-18
CHARGED WITH CONSPIRACY
FARRELL STRIKERS IN ANSONIA
 SERTED WITH INJUNCTION.
Issued by Judge Gagcr of the Superior C0urt-PrOhibits Interference With New Men E mpIoyed by tho Company Damage Suit i'm S25,0OO Brought Against Members of Labor Unions.

Against Members of Labor Unions.
 The strike situation in Ansonia has reached a crisis. F. w. Holden, coun- sel for the Farrel Foundry and Ma chine company, having obtained a tenn porary injunction restraining the strik- CTS from making effort to~prevent men returning to work in the Taller shops.
 Prominent members of the labor un- ions have also been served with papers in an attachment for s25,00O and order ed to appear in the superior court next September for trial Some of them, re- gently employed by the Farrels and now on strike, are charged with con- spiracy.
 Judge Gagers injunction prohibits the strikers from interfering in any way with those employed by the Farrel company, the penalty for violation of the order being fixed at $5,000
 The order of Judge Gager restraints the strikers from 'in any manner in terfering with any person who may de- sire to enter the employ of the Farrel company, by way of threats, persua- sions, personal violence, intimidation,
 
 to prevent such persons from entering or continuing In the employ of the plaintiff or calculated to induce such persons to leave the employ of the plaintiff.
 From boycotting the plaintiff and the plaintiffs Workmen either by threats, intimidation, persuasion or otherwise.
 From interfering, intimidating, boy cotting, molesting or threatening in any manner any person or persons for the purpose of indusing such person or per- sons not to deal with or do business with the plaintiffs workmen.
 For picketing or patroling about in the, ,neighborhood of the premises of the plaintiff or in other places with the fn- tent to interfere with the employees of the plaintiff or with the prosecution of their business. or to interfere or ob- struct in any manner the business or trade of the plaintiff.
 From picketing or patroling the fac tory or other property of the plaintiff, or causing said premises to be picketed or patrolled, or for loitering about the factory of the plaintiff, or from mak- ing loud or boisterous noises in the vii cinity thereof, or from causing any of said acts to be done by others; or from persuading or assisting any or counsel ing or advising any such acts.
 From interfering with the free access of the employees of the plaintiff to the plaintiffs premises and their places of work and the free return of said em- ployes to their places of business or their home.
 From all concerted action, or other wise doing any act or causing any act to be done, or causing noises which would interfere in any manner with the employees of the plaintiff or it's business or cause injury or damage to it's busi- ness or property.
 From giving any instructions or or ders to committees, associations or otherwise for the performance of any of the aforesaid acts or threats herein before enjoined. From in any manner whatever inn peding, disturbing or interfering with the regular operation and conduct of the business of the plaintiff or of em- ployes now in the employ of the plain tiff, or that may hereafter be employed | by 1t, until the first Tuesday of Septem- Der, 1901 and until said superior court | shall make further order in the prem | ses. Signed:
 Edwin B. Gager
 A Judge of the Superior Court The injunction is a new procedure so | Tar as it applies to this state, but is lot new in this country. Such a case 'ame to the attention of the United states supreme court in the case against Eugene V. Debs, the socialist | eader. The supreme court decided that l such an injunction would stand.