Arizona daily citizen., 1901-02-18
More CObre
Grande Litigation.

| fls s 50
In the Cobre Grande litigation tme
steps were taken in the distriet corr
In Phoenix Saturday. Some time agc
A. W. HaIlenberg Of New York fiIed !
petion for interventi0n in tie case 81
the Gobre Grande Copper company ssr.
sas ". g. Greene, George Mitchell and
the Phoenix National hank. The Re.
publican says that the case was argued
and II was ordered that the petition be
denied. Exceptions were taken and no.
tice Of appeal TO the supreme couri
was given,
The other step was the filing 81 IN In.
junction suit BY w. g. tareene against
.. II. Costello of Buffalo, Axal w. Hal
ienhefg q Kew York eity and tha Phoe.
nix National bank.
The complaint recites that on Deccm-
Der 18th. 1909, The plaintiif agreed TO
buy of =. 3, Gage, who aSreed to seli to
him, lI5,0ie shares Of stock of The
cobre Grande company st n. 80 share :
that Mr.. Gage held the stock Id trust of
various owners; that Re paid 10 Mr.
Gage fifty cents psr SHARE 81 the stock
% drst pavment. IN accordance with
the oontrsess 8 900 shsrss ot this stock
belonged to Mr.. Halienborx md raa
hsid Ia escrow In The rhoenix Nationai
bank. Also that Mr. Costello at tn
tims claimed 70 own y. .5I7 p-I0 of ssoek.
then n Nj. Gass,s tr1sk md dist NJ.
Costello pasticipatsd Ii ~ seeotiaalons
% iar q they applied u him. And that
be received any esnts pr share for his
stock. s NJ
Tho piainsia says ~ 10 nov rsasiy d
maks tbe secoad payment Of II per shase
en The stock ID sccpsdance with the cou-
tract and has deposited with The bank
Nj pm SHARE far al stosk exceps tisat
owned By Messss. Costello and HAlten-
hssx. He aiso alieges that the contract
ms ensercf Into for Ire parposs u step-
ping litigation md tsss nserxiAg u III
saits and interests In this confract. md
thai pr agreement ali snils hesMssn
CostNIIo snd lhe Gscene Consolidated
copper 1ompany h Mes York wers VI
b. di@msssea; that II yiolasion If sh's
eontrsct i sais iastiIl pendins ID Bnilas0.
=. 4. and anpther II Esw York Oily.
NH ptaintia believes be shcald ~ ~
fsQnis~d n make Tho sesand payn,ene
tiii rrpoG Il xlssn 81 the dismissal u
tisese ssiss. ii which tlnss IL II reedy 10
csrry ouf nv past u ~ eentsscs
Ths euanp iaIat NayA iurths< Mn aitet
plsInlia msds IN Ars paxgseas ~ ~
fiziIsntssx sfark N isseaaant Haalep~
49, MI ! ssit Il Ysssrai counsy VI
sst as5,ie the consracs. c1sinIax fraad
aaa askine iaAys ii intesvsae ii sais Ii
Sfsxscops csanty wfersin the ('obsst tsEan-
ascompAsy h pixinsfif and " @. Grsens
mi others defendsnss and which u the
isuis referred 10 In tho besinn,ng oI this
article.
Tho piaintiH. Greens. In thls cass al
isses tAas HaIienbosg has repadiated
tho coatFxct ard believes that be.
Grseas, should moi ss called upon To-
make ths sscond isaysnsns 90 The Hal.
isabosx atcck I'LL ths suit In YavapAi
county Il disaainsd. He farther ssss
thaf shoaid ths stock 10 escpw be re-
tafned q vim sork irrsparabae injury 70
him Ior which be would have no ~
course Ia iaw. wherefore be asks that
she bank BE- enloined from declasing 4
iorfeftnre and that Messrs. costeiIo and
fiaiIenboss b rsstnined Iron aaking
ior tlse second psyment upon tAs stock.
The ininacsion was issned.