The Montgomery advertiser., 1901-08-15

hlnR, WeathAfiY- Kirkland. Willet.
 Kyle. Williams. of El- Leigh. more. During the call of the roll:
 MT. Greer (Calhoun)-I ask unani- nous consent to explain my vote. There was objection. MT. Jones (Montgomery)-I vote no simply to keep faith With the gentle men on the other side. It is not my sentiments. I beg the Chairs pardon Mr. ONeal (When his name was reach)-I desire to say that I vote aye because it appears that some of the other side (the remainder of the statement was drowned by loud expres- sions of dissent.)
 And by a vote of 77 ayes and 3S noes the amendment was laid upon the ta- ble.
 MT Hood-I move the adoption of Section 2. and upon that call for the previous question.
 Mir. Long (Walker)-I hope that the gentleman will withdraw that.
 There were expressions of dissent.
 Mir. Fitts-You mean as reported by the Committee?
 MT. Hood-As amended by unani- nous consent
 MT. Long (Walker)-I ask the gentle
 
 Mir. Sollie-I would be glad to hear it read.
 MT. Oates-I would like to hear the section read as amended.
 The Secretary read as follows: '"The chancellors. judges of probate courts. solicitors and judges of inferior courts from which an appeal may be taken directed to the Supreme Court, may be removed from office for any of the causes certified in .he preceding sec tion by the Supreme Court. under such regulations as may be prescribed by law.
 MT. O'Neal-The sheriffs name is not in there.
 The President-Was that not stricken out by amendment? The Chair is in formed. The Secretary read the mi nOritV report.
 The Secretary read Section as fol lows: The chancelIors, judges of cir cult courts. judges of probate courts, sheriffs. solicitors and judges of infe- rior courts from which an appeal may be taken directly to the Supreme Court may be removed from office for any of the causes specified in the preceding section by the Supreme Court, under such regulations as may be prescribed by law"
 He iuNohDii "iAt LO upon the adoption of the section and uocn that the previous question is de- manded and the question is. shall the main question be now put?
 The main question was ordered.
 Upon a vote being taken the section was adopted =.:-..
 MT. Hood-I move that the Article be engrossed and ordered to a third reading. and upon that I call for the previous question.
 The main question was ordered.
 The President-The question is on the motion to order this article en- crossed and to a third reading.
 Mr. Wilson (Clarke)-I rise to a point of inquiry. Is the ordinance ac- companying that article which we re- considered this morning a part of the Article?
 The Presidential Is not part of the article. 1t is a separate ordinance.
 MT. Long-I rise to a point of par liamentary inquiry. Can l now offer an article on impeachment exactly like the old Constitution as substitute?
 The President-The question Is on or dering this article to a third reading and engrossment.
 MT. Jones (Montgomery)-Jrnde that article as it stands now, is the sheriff
 
 MT Fitts-Yes. sir. we have just rassed it.
 Mir. Fefiin-I think somebody called for the previous question but the Con- yention has not vet sustained 1t.
 The PyAsidont--Tt was just submitted 10 the Convention and sustained by q very large vote.
 The question is on ordering this ar .l-le to engrossment and a third read Ing.
 MT. Hood-I move the adoption nf inc ordinance Yeconsidered this morn lnr. ordinance 404
 The Presiden:-Cnless the Conven- ton makes the consideration of this Article on Impeachment a special or der, 1t would he displaced and the next order of business would come up.
 MT. ONeaI-T rise to a point of or Ter. This ordinance reported by the ~ommittee on Impeachments was re- norted as separate ordinance. lt then became a new section to the Ar :icIe on Impeachments they adopted,