The Jasper weekly courier. [volume] (Jasper, Ind.) 1858-1922, 1901-06-14
Dubois Circuit Court

Dubois Circuit Court
Mill run out grist Saturday early
and adjourned about 10 O'Clock till
Monday morning, when it resumed
early, and has been running steady
since, the lawyers supplying enough
business for two ordinary weeks.
The following shows the disposition
OF causes up to noon yesterday:
State VS.. Maggie Hamilton sure
ty Of the peace; dismissed on mo-
ton of Safe.
State VS. VIM p. Hamilton; a 4
b. with intent to murder; intent
nollied plea Of guilty as to A.& B.;
fined So, and he went to Jail.
State vs.. VIM. I. Young; furn-
ishing cigarette wrappers nolliedon
plea of former adjudication.
State vs.. VIM. Luegers; selling
l.. on Sunday nollied.
State VS.. John Ambs selling L..
to minor; nollied.
State VS.. Peter Schnell and Lon
Clark nollied in one liquor case;
fined So each in five cases, and not
guilty in one, and continued in 9TH
ers.
State VS.. Frank Roos; S. l.. W..
L.; not guilty in two cases, fined
- in one.
State vs.. Alb. Markley ). l.. W..
L.; fined s..
State VS.. John Waddle A. x B.,
not guilty
State vs.. Charles sutton: A. &
B.. fined s25 on plea Of guilty.
State vs.. Cleve Patterned, petit
larceny; plea of guilty and under
a~dvisement.
State VS. James Heacock; \. &
B. with intent to rape, and robbery I;
plea not guilty.
CIVIL ACTIONS.
James j. Cunningham, admir- Of
@ Hobbs estate, had the former or
der for sale of real estate, continued
in force.
Emma G.. Anderson vs.. +. ;.
Chatard, ct al. Madison township
drainage case; w. I. Young, COM
missioner, makes final report, which
is approved, ard he is discharged
The Cannelton Water Works VS.
The City of C~annelton defendant
filed yesterday seven additional
paragraphs Of answer, to each OF
which plaintiffs demur, and argu-
ment thereon was being heard yes
terday afternoon.
s. Ind. Loan Assn of Rockport
VS.. VIM. +. West, e; al. continued
by agreement.
John p. Craig, ct al, ". w. w.
Cooper and wife; continued on mo.
ton Of plaintiff.
Delilah Underhill vs.. Ed. Under
hill; divorce granted plaintiff Gus
tody Of children to their grand
father; plaintiff to pay grandfathei
for their support $50 by July lst
and $50 each six months thereaftet
for 10 years, or until further orde
Of court; plaintiff has judgment 70
$50 alimony, $25 atty fee in 81
days.
Mccormick Harvester Co. W
James Clements; dismissed by plff
Farmers & Merchants Bank vs
VIM. I. Huls, ct al. judgment 70
plaintiff for 1927.
Agatha Mendel vs.. Geo. Bless
niger; appeal; verdict for plaintiff
for 81. 95, and costs divided.
VIM. G.. Skaggs VS.. Franz
Wuetcher; jury Trial lasting tw'
days; verdict for defendants.
Caroline Droste vs.. estate Of Mel
chior Droste; claim Of sos allowed
against estate.
Peter Doersam vs.. Henry Fritsch
for damages jury trial began Tues
day, and jury had not agreed Thurs
day noon. !.
Zeno Hobbs vs.. Ida Hobbs; di
vorce granted plaintiff; custody 0
child to defendant till further OF
der; plaintiff to pay defendant 70
support Of child $500, the first s2I
on Aug. let, 1901, and $25 each 81.
months thereafter; and that he pa
her 5000 alimony; $50 in 81.
months, and $50 every six month
thereafter till paid.
Lydia Sutton vs.. Charles Sutton
divorce granted plaintiff, and $15'
alimony, and her maiden name re
stored.