The Jasper weekly courier. [volume] (Jasper, Ind.) 1858-1922, 1901-06-21
TRIcKsTERs IN TROUBLE.
Certain Republicans Are RaisIsg .
Row over MckisIey's Re-
cipFecity Toy.

Representative Dalzcll, who renre.
sents the gigantic Industrial infaats
of Pennsylvania on the ways and
means committee. is badly frightened.
When Mr.. Mckinley assured him
that the Babcock bill and similar
measures would amount to nothing
he replied: They will split the re-
publican party. They amount to that
much at least"
Therefore, Mr.. Dalzell is urging all
congressman who look up.n the
Dingley fetch as too sacred to be
touched to meet him in Washington,
that they may take counsel together.
1t is safe to say that Mr.. McKin-
ley himself is not so confident as he
pretends to be. His outgivings for
the past two years and more to tho
effect that we must seek foreign mar
kets by means of reciprocity treaties
show that he perceivcs the danger TO
the fetch. He sees that something
must be done to pacify such republic
ans as Mr.. Babcock. who are able to
see the connection between monopoly
combines and the tariff, and who
think the people can see it and will
make trouble unless something is
done to remove the great bulwark
Of the confederated monopolies.
The Mckinley plan for saving the
Dingley tariff is to make lot OF
reciprocity dickers and parade them
before the people as the only thing
to build up the export trade. His
theory is that IL the people are
amused with reciprocity treaties and
colonial toys they will think no moro
about the tariff-fattened combines
and the Dingley tariff except as il is
touched in spots by the treaties.
But Mr.. Dalzell and his like are
no better pleased with reciprocity
treaties than they are with Babcock
bills. They regard both as wicked
devices of the enemy of sacred Ding
leyism. Besides. they perceive that
men like Mr.. Babeock are not going
to rest content with the reciprocity
mode of favoritism, because they
know that manufacturers VINO can
export their products and sell them
under the very noses OF their most
formidable rivals do not need protec-
ton at all.
The Mckinley attempt TO substitute
reciprocity treaties of more than
doubtful constitutionality for the re-
moval of duties which serve only to
enable their benefciaries TO exact
far more from Americans than they
are glad to get from foreigners will
not work.
i. will not satisfy .he Dalzell pro-
tectionists. who mean to fight to the
death against reduction of duties in
any degree or manner. 1t will not
satisfy such republicans as Mr.. Bah
cock. who do not believe that those
who need no protection should have
tariff to shield them in robbing
their own countrymen while supply
ing foreigners at competitive prices.
1t will not satisfy the victims of the
tariff-buttressed combines - victims
who cannot be kept in ignorance OF
the fact that they are forced to pay
from SIS TO $50 for an article which
the same American manufactures
sells to foreigners for ten dollars.
The presidents reciprocity toy will
not satisfy anybody. because it will
not fool anybody. Republicans who
want tariff for protection stand
face TO face with republicans who
want tariff for robbery only. The
conflict between them Is irrepressi-
BILE.
No reciprocity dickers or jugglery
of adroit politicians can reconcile
them or avert the impending struggle
for mastery-Chicago Chronicle.