The Honolulu republican. [volume] (Honolulu, T.H.) 1900-1902, 1901-10-24

rreus ~ k,rc~lag BAtssrsA-
AK e.sp.rsz.tsah GasI 1EarsSon ha6
eaa4sssa = s--ssal 1susa &c ssaurIlg 4l1IAn-
.-trFeu ~ naas sasa Hss snazEg -sk1 lo&1eS-
~ - -sssss4A lss -yseEseraI nnox Is saokt
1se-L e0K 80 y Hosr Gays 1Bu1sscn >
ssFxzn % -fisa~ l1as ass1 ElSeu tx 1&rcaIE
,.osss- a4sl * HAS ssugnE ~ uesauae.
= .sass - ess.t0sazl sEsSse--
"a the Lslafu sa4ys sc opens cut as2in
nAs
~. 4. kInney, the notorious cou1einpt
.aN yer Va la~ xaa4lspnrsss campaign WIS
lTuf@rsy HA-s8 ~ JaIslsS Sear lor ceIng
laEe Wien a szz< IN Ensch 1e Vas interest,"
ca MIS- e4llesl- 1ae images Oh TIE Irst CIr-
eugE aagr Aad Osaas4Ozs 10 nESe JURORS Tor
.s.sE-g Eete LnAEsso1 reln4lnesl quiet
54ass tSe4r nn-u Attorney nIEney. one
"a Use llaaortaI InlEIy -sefeus ana mar
loR aKisss IA wFatn alugmg TIE lnuendO
" sohtAeai JNnge AZ tHe Jaage Of the
\ Irsz Circuit.
Eaaa a lesson not been given the con
tempt lawyers ~ Attorney s5eneraI hn0x
4 j. safe to say hIaney wonIa naTe APP
geaieI 10 the supreme Court Inurston
resumed the pracrlye OF law and hIs organ
ueguu brOInIug al tine mouth with de-
.lauas that SIear. lie removed Experl-
e8ee. however, has caused the leadIng
Assasslns OF character 70 De more cIrcum-
-iftEl 10 bifCAaAAQAor IAA Int
saons used IL 1nurston organ tliIs morn
4hg-s ioFai. Don't fail 10 90 politlcs
with the court shows that the cam
palzn 10 discredit independent courts OF
,usIIce IN THIS Territory Is still gong on,
sgta MALICIOUS inuenGo as its corner stone
aad pohuSal spite as It's motive power
he inference that politics influence
the operations OF Judge Gear court IS
as nsancious as IhursJon's continuous at
lfeFr
reaerenee 10 Judge Humphreys Grim
mai record.
This calls to MUD that the official or
gan OF the Dole-Ihurston ring has moth
Mg TO say IN reply 10 the challenge that
Humphreys record be given 10 the
public. their discretion Is perhaps TO be
commended, as they know the charge
70 be utterly false. They ought at least
0e willing 10 report to the public ways
and means used 10 secure material by
which Humphreys character might be
DETAINED.
Is it true or not true that Thurston
Kinney ct al. employed member of the
law hrm of Chickering X Thomas to go
TO Arizona TO secure Humphreys Grim
NAL record
Is il true or not true that this law
yer-detective could secure only an attl-
davit from the man Cooper, who tried
humphreys had robbed two widows,
whose names he could not and did not
give, and that Humphreys went to San
francisco and eluded the Sheriff of Pinai
county, Arizona, by going TO Honolulu
Mas not this so-called criminal charge
entirely disproyed by the same sheriff
when he, on the occasion of Judge
| Humphreys visit to Florence, still being
Sheriff of Pinal county. AriZ.. eontribut-
Ell to and was present at banquet given
| by leading citizens of the town IN
I Humphreys honor. Ii what Cooper said
was true WHY should the Sheriff have
failed to arrest Humphreys on the occas-
| ion of his recent visit to the scenes OF
what Thurston's organ says is his Grim
inal recordE
Is it true or not true, that the Thurs
ton-Kinney ring supplied this lawyer-de-
| tective with two letters in which the
writers said Humphreys was man OF
violent temper, and that when the Cover
nor of Arizona was asked 10 certify 10
the good character of the writers, be re
| fused to do it?
Is it true or not true that in search.
| ing for Humphreys Mississippi record
the Thurston-kinney ring found only
| that Humphreys was a member OF one OF
the oldest. wealthiest and most infiuen-
tial families of the State: that no man,
/ woman or child could be found TO say
aught hut good of him?
! Is il true or not true that Kinney re-
/ ceived an anonymous letter giving Hum
phreys' alleged record" in Vicksburg
| that Kinney Immediately betrayed his
own character bv forwarding this anony-
nous letter to Chickering x Thomas. re-
ouesting them to follow it up; that they
| did write their Vicksburg correspondents,
| Dahnev & McCabe. and the reply came
/ back that Humphreys had never lived III
| Vickshurg. but was member of dis
| tinguished family at Columbus. Miss.
some 400 miles distant.
| Is il true or not true that Thurston-
| Kinney ct al. cannot find single derall
of Judge Humphreys career, since the
day of his birth. to support the charge
made in ThurStOn's organ that Hu npl-
| indiscretion that compares with the use
of an anonymous letter?
The Bulletin challenges Thurston and
! his organ to produce any detail that
might serve TO suhstantiate its charge
that Judge Humphreys has criminal
record
The Bulletin challenges Thurston an
| his organ 10 produce any evidence IN
support by fact the slanderous ind a,do
expressed this morning that politics or
personality have the slightest fore or
effect in the action of Judge Gear or any
other Judge of the First Circuit Court.
I No such evidence can he produced
! ThurSton knows 1T. His constant ham
mering at the Judges of the First Cir
cult Court is merely part and parcel of
the ThurSton scheme TO degrade the