The Wilmington daily Republican. (Wilmington, Del.) 1890-1902, 1901-02-05
I'm SUPERIOR
COURT.

| Chief Justice Lore and associated
Judges were on the bench when the
the Superior Court met this morl-
ing. They informed the grand
Jury that there would be no heavy
cases and the jury retired to their
| room.
Herbert Ward, counsel for the
| plaintiff in the case Of the OXy.Hv.
| drogen and John Edward Addicks
W.. the Street and Sewer directors,
asked that the mandamus be set
aside and an alternative writ, re.
turnable Saturday, Feb. %, be is
sued.
Mr.. Whiteman counsel for the
plaintiff IN the case Of Edward FL.
Grant vs.. Anna Grant made re-
turn OF the commission Of divorce
and publication was ordered.
The bar went ovei the trial list
and the following were marked:
Thomas VS.. p. II. II. Co.; Gear vs.
p. w. & B. II. X, Co, special jury;
human VS.. Diamond State Iron Co.
special jury; Ewing VS.. Mayor and
Council. special jury; Warren VS.,
Mccullough Iron Co. special jury;
L. Fromm vs.. p, w. g. B. X. II. Co,
special jury; Grimes VS. P. w. g. b.
Co. special jury; Dougherty VS..
Mayor and Council; Woolery vs..
Lynch and Hughes; Dunn vs.. Com
mercial Fire Insurance Co.; Cahlli
vs.. Jessup g. Moore Paper Co., Doe
e. May VS.. Roe; Big Bed Slate
Quarry Co. VS.. Mitchell; Forwood
vs.. Brown; Greenwood VS.. W. c, II.
Conroy vs. Mayor and Council: Mac
Farlanc VS.. GARRETT. Barr: Lank
VS.. Mavor aud Council special jury;
Peters VS., Commercial Fire Insur.
ance Co.: Lacy VS.. B. g. p, r, r..
Co.: Biddle VS.. McMullin: Mayne vs.
Mayor and City Council; Chandler
VS.. Mayor add Council and B. a. p.
r. II. CO.. Smith VS.. Forbes; Parres
d. b. a. vs, Bayne p. b. r.; Bring
hurst trustee, vs. Baldwin; Doe
VS.. Roe; Miller vs., Republican Pa
p. Co.; Fralm VS., Fahey. special
jury; Strawbridge g. Clothier vs..
Pyle; Lore Vs. GAINESVILLE Mig. Co.
Taylor VS.. Chrlstiana River Imp,
Co.; Lehigh vs.. Pussy a. Jones Co.;
State of Delaware VS., John L.
Dickey; Hyrons VS.. w. c. r. Co.,
special jury; Mitchell vs.. White;
Fell VS.. Valentine: Connolly VS..
Jones; Connolly VS., T. Cardwell g.
Son: Roberts VS. Wardner; and
Giordano VS.. Brandywine Granite
Co.. special jury.
In the case OF Bessie Hickman vs.
Harvey Hickman, leave was grant
ed to withdraw exhibit made in
previous case.
A rule OF writ Of possession made
returnable later was granted in
the case OF Martin e. Watson. exec.
utor for J. II. H. Watson VS.. d. T.
Bradford.
In the foreign attachment case OF
j. Norris Robinson VS.. Marie ].
Robinson. leave was granted to
amend
A rule for security for costs was
granted IN the case o. Ringwalt VS..
{. J. Allen.
At IL o'clock the grand jury re.
turned from the chamber aud
brought six indictments with them.
They we're John II. Murray, John
Fl. Wooten, James Walton, Sadie
Chambers aud two against Lavine
Stockle. all indicted tor larceny.
Edward Mulvey and Patrick Brady
indicted for larceny, were ignored
and will be discharged.
The indictments we're against
Lavina Stoeckle we're the larceny
Of a skirt valued at $50, a wo-
mans garment valued at IS. and
hat valued at -. She pleaded
guilty and as it was her first Of.
tense asked for the mercy OF the
court,
The Indictment against Sadie
Chambers was the larcenyo Of pair
of corsets valued at 50 cents, She
pleaded guilty and asked for the
mercy Of the court.
The indictment against James
Walton was the larceny OF pair
Of shoes valued at 50 cents. He
pleaded guilty.
Court then recessed until ?. 30 this
afternoon.