davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
Aberdeen herald. [volume] (Aberdeen, Chehalis County, W.T.) 1886-1917, 1901-03-28
DolNGS At THE COURT HOUSE.
Business Trans acted by the superior
Court and List of Instruments
Filed With officials.
SupcriOr Court.

superior Court.
Tho f,l,oving is the record OF business trans
acted in the superior court Tor the week Gnu
iug March %. l"l.
CT Burdick VS. J ITolenbeck ct al.
Order of foreclosure OF tax lien signed.
II Hilton vs. Geo Cathacart ct al.
Same.
FEJooes VS. Jas Bartholet Sr, trustee.
Same.
In re estate OF A p Beck, deceased.
Appraisers appointed, and notice to
redilors directed.
In re estate of Harvey Dunlap ct al,
,inors. Appraisers appointed, and order
sale signed.
In re guardianship Of Dean Smith, an
a,ered incompetent person. Continued
to March %.
I'm re estate Of John G Bowes, deceased.
Appraisers appointed.
In re estate of d w Organ, deceased.
Notion f. make more definite sustained.
Jas Beck VS. NJ q Denton. Six cases
dismissed.
I'm 20 estate of Alice d Reed, deceased.
Order to show cause why real estate
should no. be sold signed.
WEC O'Nei VS. The n \ Fisheries.
Demurrer to complaint overrued.
In re estate Ct Nellie + Moulton, de-
ceas d. Judgment Of distribution and
disc a &c signed.
Jonn Erickson VS. Paul Smts. Motion
Of defendant to strike from complaint
sustained.
C;r.vs Harbor Boom Co VS. Lytle Log 4
Mercantile Co. Motion to set aside de-
nied. and plaintiff allowed to amend
complaint.
AN Eklund Jr VS. L Whitney ct al.
Order to take deposition signed.
In re estate of I. Annes, deceased.
Time set for hearing application to sell.
wv Mason vs. John Douglass ct al.
Set for trial April l.
Fl G Ellis VS. A W Carl. Set for trial
April |.
VIM f Entrop VS. Fred II Green. Set
.or trial April t.
is Book VS. Al West. To he heard
by visiting Judge April l.
FL Williams VS. Ninemire 4 Morgan.
set for trial April 8.
Capital Brewing Co VS. W } Crosbe.
TO be heard by visiting judge April 3.
Smith ct Tx VS. b f Huff, sheriff.
Demurrer OF defendant overruled.
Murphy & Newberry VS. Chas S Clark
ct al. Order requiring the q IL Com'l
10 to pay money into court signed.
] E Mullinex VS. II NJ Brumett. Motion
20 strike from answer denied
NEW CASES.
VIM F Entrop VS. Fred II Green. Debt
John Erickson VS. Paul SHIFTS Dam
ages.
smith VS. B F HUFF, sheriff. Injunc,
sion.
Jas Beck VS. L |. Remer ct al. Fore
closure of delinquency certificate.
Same VS. NJ G Denton ct al. Same.
State OF Washington VS. II + Bush.
EXhibNil : Il deadly weapon.
W !. Baker IS Baker, DEBT.
Aberdeen herald. [volume] (Aberdeen, Chehalis County, W.T.) 1886-1917, 1901-03-28
Real Estate Transfers.


For TIA week ending March %, conn lied
som the records for the exclusive use OF the
berCcen HERALD:
Tho% Foreman to Mary A Hourquin,
o,k L. Eureka add Elma-$5O.
r. J stoncr to A Keulper, lot Is, blk s,
" 4 BIS add Elma- 81.
Mamie a Wooding to Emily S Dalton,
Ut Il liz ., W K BIS add Abelleen-
300
L b Bignold to Frank II Lamb Timber
80, he j sec 32-lS-s-$2)00.
Leon Greenebaum to JOHN sheldon, els
'ot ), blk 10, Aberdeen-$25.
l. Harlow to T Nallayama, part of lot
;, blk SO, iIoqniam-S5O0.
\ preyer to Wilson Bros & Co, lots Is
and H. Iabney's Water Front add Aber-
leen-S3oa.
Z Kaufman to same. lots II and IS,
same all-$3)0.
The Aberdeen Land Co to same, lots
N sane ald-$350.
J VI llackett to a j Anderson, blk b.
" 4 BIS add Abeldcen-$375.
& i Anderson to l. + Paine, lots and
5, blk b, W 4 BPS add Aberdeen-$35O.
Sheriff to Z lwarl Campbell, sheriff $
Deed, lots l and >, blk 3, Z, C & lis add
Elma 1868.
Same to Edward Brown, sheriii's deed,
lot 3; sel4 OF nw4 and ella OF swl4 sec
s 1S-6-S32OS,53.
b and Allen to II Brewer, sw d
Of nwl4 and nw14 Of swl4 sec 5-17-6-
$1,000.
Adm'rs OF estate Of Alex Young to ]
Carlson, lots l to inc, blk 8, North
Aberdeen-$500.
wv Hosting to II G Ellis 4 Co, swl4
sec 3-16-9-$50.
Heirs OF Eliza J Wilson, decd, to V
Best lots II IS and 10, Arland's add
Montesano-$l25.
W w Anstie to John Lindstrom, lot 5,
blk !, Frances add Aberdeen-$l50.
Anthony Nash to + II Greene. same
property-$l250.
Adam Baecker to Anthony Nash. lots
Aberdeen herald. [volume] (Aberdeen, Chehalis County, W.T.) 1886-1917, 1901-03-28

The HERALD Office telephone number
has been changed from 23l to SOL.
Aberdeen herald. [volume] (Aberdeen, Chehalis County, W.T.) 1886-1917, 1901-03-28

Connects with stage at Westport to and from
South Bend.
Aberdeen herald. [volume] (Aberdeen, Chehalis County, W.T.) 1886-1917, 1901-03-28
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
L Of Washington for Chehalis County.

l.. s. Norm Plaintiff, VS.. Nellie Funnson, and
all person unknown. If any. having or claim
ing to have an interest in and to the real
property hereinafter described. Defendants
Summons in Foreclosure OF Tax Lien
The State OF Washington to Nellie Funnlson
and all persons unknown, If any, having OF
claiming to have an interest in and 10 the
real property hereinafter described:
You and each of you are hereby notified that
quency No. 627. issued on the sth day OF Janu-
airy, A. b. 1909, by the County OF Chehalis.
state Of Washington. for the amount OF one
and nlnety-two onehundredth. dollars, the
same being the amount then due and delin-
qient for taxes for the year 1896 together with
penalty. interest and costs thereon, upon real
the owner. or reputed owner situate in said
county and particularly bounded and described
as follow, tO-wit
The west half WIZ of lot four "a block seven
90 Wishkah, Nash.
and upon which have paid taxes assessed
against said property as follows:
Years Tax. Date Paid Tax RECEIPT No. Amt;
1898. ....Jan 5, 1900. s.
1899 ............M May TO- 1900 ...3i6s...... 3 "a
9;.:;;....Msr 4 1901 lo72 Sc
Certificate OF Delnqu s14 y
All of said amounts bearing interest at the
rate OF fifteen per cent per annum, and you are
further notified that viii apply to the superior
said county. for a Judgment forecosing my
lien against the property hereinbefore
mentioned, and YOU are hereby summoned to
appear within sixty days after the service OF
this summons upon YOU. excl sive OF the day
OF service, and defend this action or pay the
amount due. together with COSTS and III case
OF your failure to do so Judgment will be
rendered foreclosine the lien for said Certti-
cate Of Delinquency taxes. penalty interest and
costs against the lands and premises herein be-
fore mentioned.
Any pleading or process may be served upon
the undersigned al the al ress hereafter
mentioned.
l.. :. NORM, Plaintiff.
J. 4. HUTCHINSON. Prosecuting Attorney.
BY l.. III. BREWER. Deputy
p. o. Address: Montesano, Washington.
Date OF first publication March p. lqol.
Aberdeen herald. [volume] (Aberdeen, Chehalis County, W.T.) 1886-1917, 1901-03-28
TIME CARD,
Steamer r. c. Reed.
LEAVE

In Effect September II, 1900.
Aberdeen herald. [volume] (Aberdeen, Chehalis County, W.T.) 1886-1917, 1901-03-28

The HERALD and W. j. Bryan's paper
for one year for 1926. strictly in advance.
The daily morning journal and courier., 1901-12-21
BANQUET IN NORTH HAVEN.

Seventh Annual of the Mayf1ower So- ciety
 The seventh annual banquet of the North Haven Mayfiower society was held in the town hall in North Haven last night and about 120 ladies and gentlemen attended. George J. Merz was toastmatser and the committee in charge consisted of Mr. Merz, Robert o. Eaton and Hon. William E. Dicker- man.
 Prior to the banquet an invocation was given by Rev. William G. Lathrop and after the dinner delightful pro- gramme was given, consisting of an address of welcome by Toastmaster Merz, roll call, reading of the May flower compact, hymn Duke Street" an address by Rev. Charles E. Ewing on "The Puritan Spirit in Modern Problems" a solo by Miss Bertha Ger trude Ives, an address by Dr. Edwin H. Bidwell on "The Puritans as Ma tion Builders" recitation by Miss Cora A, Eaton an address by Sheldon B. Thorpe on Have We Any Further Use for the Puritan?" a solo, "The Rosary" by Miss Ives, a recitation by Miss Eaton, an address by Rev F. B. Doane on .rhe Use of Our Heritage"
 At the business meeting T. Peet Tut tie, town clerk of North Haven. was elected a member of the committee to succeed Robert o. Eaton, whose term expired.
The daily morning journal and courier., 1901-12-21

the unanimous findings of the court We have the honor to be,
 Samuel c. Lemly, Judge Advocate Court of Inquiry.
 F. H. Hanna.
 Assistant to Judge Advocate. To the Secretary Of the Navy.
The daily morning journal and courier., 1901-12-21
WATER CONTRACT HEARING
Continued from First PageD

Continued from First Page)
 might be cited to show that it was inn practica ble He had been told by good authority that the New Haven Water company was the largest holder of real estate in the state. To buy the plant the city would probably have to pay the market value of the stock. If the water company could pay dividend that was no sign that the city could make money from ownership of the wa ter works, but on the other hand there would probably be a tax to make up 6 deficit He said that where there was municipal ownership of water works each home was taxed for water whether it was occupied or not. He favored a franchise tax and said that the water company would in no way object to paying such tax
 Alderman Harvey c. Shepard was next heard He said that New Ha ven must have water and that there was no way to get it except from the water company. The length of the term of the contract was in his opinion the only question open to discussion. He favored a two year contract. He saul LndL the Water SupplS ouSAC Io oG secured from beneath the surface. Sur face water was unhealthful. He said that in Camden, N. J., 150 deaths oc- cured in a given period when there was a surface supply, while during the same period after an underground sup ply was received there were only five deaths The ground was a natural fil- ter. He would say to the water com pany that if at the end of two years the company had not established an underground supply or a filter system the city would establish for itself an underground supply. He said that few years ago he had had an expert examine the country about New Haven
The daily morning journal and courier., 1901-12-21
Trxne11ers 6mfas.
New York, New Haven
 and Hartford R. R.
December 1. 1901.

| ~oSChioci l, 1SV1. NEW YORK DIVISION. 1 FOR NEW YORK-*4:05, "4:60, x8:10, x7:OO. "S:Qo. xS:1O. S:3O, "s:S5, x1O30 a. m., Nl2:10. l2:15, 1:30 (parlor car limit edD, "1:35, 2.00, *2:30, 3:0O t4:00. 4.17. 4:SO, *5:10. 5:35, *6:10. 6:3o. ~7.10. *s:10. S:15, Bridgeport accommodation. .s .10. s:l5 p. m sundays-'4:o5. "4:50. xS:OO, S:55 a. m., "2:S0, x4:S0, "5:1O x6:l5, .7:10. *s:10. "S:30, "9:10 p. m. FOR WASHINGTON via Harlem River-+1:O5, "11:35 D. m. (daily1.l
 FOR BOSTON via Hartford and VII. limantic-+1O:03 a. m., B :357 D. m.
 For BOSTON via New London and Providence-"2;10, *2:2O, +11:35 (parlor car limited) a. m., "12:05, "2:47. .4:06. @4:55, #6:55 p. m. Sundays-*2:lo. s2:2o a. m., *12:05, "2:47, *4:55, *6:55 D. m.
 FOR BOSTON via Springf1eld-+1:1o 10. .1l.05 a. m., "1:45, *5:52 p. m. Sundays 'l:1O a. m., *5:52 p. m.
 HARTFORD DIVISION. FOR MERIDEN, HARTFORD, SPRINGFIELD, etc.--+1:10, $40, 7:52 9:35 a. m. Uo Hartford), x10:03 (to Hartford), *11:05 a, m., 12:0s. *1:4b, 3:lO. "3:55 to Hartford, BOO, *5:52, 6:15, 700 (to Hartford. 500, 10:OO, 11:15 (to Meriden) D, m. Sundays-1:1o a. m.. 12:OS, *5:52, TOO, S:28 p. m. SHORE LINE, DIVISION.
 For New London, etc-+2:10. s2:2o. 7:4S. 1o;OS (to Guilford) 11:05, +11:36 (parlor car limited) a. m, *12:O5, 2.15, '2:47,'4:05, '4:55. 5:15, 6:15. (to Saybrook Junction), *6;55, 112O (Guilford acc) D. m. Sundays-*2:10. +2:2O a. m., 12:05, "2:47. *4:55. a6:55 D. m.
 AIR INSTRUMENTATION DIvI-
 SION.
 For Middletown, willimantic, etc. 7:36 a. m., 12:55. "2:33, 500 D. m. Sum- days-7:15 p. m. Connecting at Middle town with the Valley branch and at Willimantlc with Eastern district and c. " R. R.; at Turnerville with Col chester branch.
 For Shelburne Falls. Turner's Falls. Williamsburg, Holyoke, New Hartford ana intermediate stations-7:50 a. m. ana 400 p. m. For Westfield and in- termediate stations, 5:57 D. m.
 For Pennington. New Hartford and points this side-75O a. m, 12;O4, 400. 5:57 D. n
 BERKSHIRE DIVISION
 For Derby Junction, Derby, Ansonia. etc-6:15, zoo, 500, 9:35 a. m. 12:05 noon, 1:1O, 2:Ss, s:57. 4:4o, 5:3O, S:5b. Too, l0:OO, l1:30 D. m. Sundays-S:25 a, n., S:30, $40, s:30 p. m.
 For Waterbury-7:OO 500, 9:35 a. m., l2:06. 2:S9. 5:S0. 7:5O, 11:80 p. m. sun- days-S:25 a. m., $40 p. m
 For Winsted-7:O0, 9:35 a. n., 2::39, 5:3O, 7:5c p. m. Sundays-8:25 a. m., $40 D. m.
 For Shelton, Botsford, Newto1vn, Danbury, Pittsfield. State Line-e:1O a. m. via Bridgeport. 9:S5 a. m., S.57 D. m. For Albany. Buffalo, Detroit Cincin- natl, St. Louis. Chicago and thn West via State Line-6:10 a. m via Bridge port 9:35, a. na., 3:57 p. m.
 For Litchfleld and points on T.itch- field branch-9:35 m. and 3:57 D. m. (via Derby Junction).
 Express Trains. xLocal Express.
 c. T. HAMPSTEAD,
 General Passenger Agent.
The daily morning journal and courier., 1901-12-21
Praf w. l.. Phelps fn Detroit.

Detroit, Dec. 20-More than 300 mem- bers of the New England society of Detroit attended the seventh annual banquet of the society given tonight in the Russell house dining room to commemorate the two hundred and eighty-first anniversary of the landing of the Pilgrims. Professor William Lyon Phelps of Yale university James Whitcomb Riley, the poet and ex-Sen- ator John Patton of Michigan were the society's guests and the speakers of the evening.
The daily morning journal and courier., 1901-12-21

city was presenting to the company $60O,000 in ten years. He thought that the company ought to give the city water for public uses which would re- duce the gift to $40,O00. Then the pri- vate rates should be reduced enough to take away as much of that $40,000 as possible. There were twelve munipal water plants In the state and they were making profits from $5.OOO per year in Wallingford to $150,000 per year in Hartford
 Water Leigh said that twenty years ago the water works could have been purchased for $900,00O and the people wouldn't accept it. $3O,OOO he said, was used to corrupt the votes of New Haven. Ten years ago the same thing came up and now in twenty years the price of the plant had increased to s6,- 100000. He didn't believe that there wasa city in the United States so rid was a city in the United States so rid were good men in the water company. They had large interests and he didn't blame them for fighting for it.
 Others who spoke for municipal own ership and in favor of contract for not more than three years were Rich ard Healy, Peter J. McGovern, Willard D. Warren and Anthony Carroll. Mir. Carroll objected to the committee con- sidering the company's proposition un- til 1t had been submitted to the con- mon council and referred and quoted from section 12S of the charter to sus- tain his position. He said that the charter was made by MT. Watrous and MT. Hamilton. He also quoted from the charter to show that no expenditure of more than s250 could be made without advertising for bids. He said that If the charter was lived up to no contract could be made with the New Haven Water company. He said people ought to be allowed to put down driven wells. He asked the committee to report against "the city paying for its own property stolen fifty-two years ago."
 The hearing adjourned at 11:15 and the committee will decide later when the next hearing will be held, as an- other at least will probably be given. 1,
The daily morning journal and courier., 1901-12-21

inserted in the new contract instead O.
 the rates In the present contract. H. f spoke of the enormous increase in the
 use of water by the city during the pas | ten years. He thought that at water
 rates the city used ,000 worth of wa 1 ter each year more than was used ter | years ago, and that therefore the com | pany's proposition was very fair one 1 That part of the company's property
 which enabled it to receive an income
 that is, the water supply, was all out side of New Haven and on it the com pany paid taxes in ten towns. By fal
 the larger portion of the company's
 property which has a value is outside
 of New Haven. The net cost of the present water contract was $6,000, the i difference between the taxes of the company and the water rate of $20,000
 The tax was on property which other wise would not pay taxes, i. e., the pipes
 underground. Concerning filtration of the water, MT. Watrous said that if
 plans now being made are carried out. in the near future the water from Lake
 Whitney, the only source where filtra-
 tion is needed. would be filtered.
 MT, Shepard moved that the meeting request the committee to recommend to the court of common council to renew the contract for three years and to ap- point a commission to inquire into the practicability and advisablity of buy ing the Water eompanys plant and es- tablishing driven well supply. Chair man Fertman informed Mir Shepard that the committee would consider the matter discussed and make a report, but would entertain no such motion.
 Attorney C. S. Hamilton said that he owned no water company stock He opposed municipal ownership and said that there was little or no natural wa ter supply in New Haven. The water company had some sins but could not be blamed for that, The company was not responsible for the pollution of the water supply. If the contract was good for two years 1t was good for ten years, He knew of places where there was municipal ownership of the water works and there the supply was not pure and the system did not operate satisfactorily.
 Ex-Alderman M E. Doohan asked MT. Hamilton where those places were and MT, Hamilton replied that they were in Canada.
 Attorney George M Wallace spoke for municipal ownership. He said that last weeks public meeting had saved the city $5,000 per year, for he knew that before that meeting the company had planned to demand $25000 per year from the city, The water company was assessed $774,000 in New Haven and about $l00.000 in other towns The diff ference between that valuation of the plant and the market value of the stock was about $5000,0O0. which represented the value of the franchise. If the com pany paid taxes on this the tax rate | in the city would be reduced 1-2 mill. | The company managed to get along | without paying $65, 900 in taxes which it , should pay and was giving to the city ] s25,0O0 worth of water for $S5,O00 The
The daily morning journal and courier., 1901-12-21
REPLY TO SCHLEY'S PROTEST
(Continued from Fifth Page.)

(COnClnu6Q IrOIH flLIH f'dSeD EETteries at Cienfuegos and the state
 nients in paragraphs and elsewhere < lint the judge advocate had substan-
 fiaily made certain admissions, whereas < the fact is that the judge advocate made no admissions respecting matters under inquiry excepting the feature under the first part of clause of the E sprecept that the flying squadron did
 d1pf withdraw at night from the en- E{rance to Santiago to a distance at sea, and that no personal cowardice on the s part of the applicant had been estab-
 1ished.
 paragraph 26 of the paper under con-
 eideration reads::
 sSThe majority of the court have en- tirely failed to determine as to who was lin command of the American naval x force engaged in the battle of Santia- Z Ho, the finding of which fact was abso- alufely necessary in order to determine
 pfoperly the first specification of the
 rrecept as to the conduct of Commo- s<1ore Schley in connection with the
 events of the Santiago capaign, ssssss1f 1t is true that a finding by the court upon this question was absolute X 1y necessary in order to determine iUr1berly the first specification of the eprecpt, then it must be stated that
 counsel for the applicant failed of their duty during the inquiry; several times < In the course of the proceedings they
 Brought this question into court and
 took 1t out again, without giving the acor opportunity to rule upon it. once even withdraw wing it so hastily as to
 Interrupt the president of the court in "a sentence that promised to be an ad-
 verse ruling. If they seriously believ-
 ed. as they now state to be the case,
 that the matter of command on July
 3rd was essential to the applicants in aterest, 1t was their plain duty not only Ito bring the question before the court,
 hut to insist upon hearing there, and
 others interested should have been
 heard To request that the court now Acer's interests be passed upon, to his
 possible prejudice, in his absence, and without hearing-a thing intolerable,
 .vhomsoever may be concerned.
 sIn conclusion we are satisfied that no good purpose would be served by re- uniting the proceedings or any of the afeatures of this inquiry to the court. A mort patient, exhaustive, and painstak Ing hearing was never given; greater .Gousideration was never extended to lany officer before a military court of !31adfry No expense was spared, no 8 8hnvenience, or facility denied, no cour 2 &sy refused The applicant has had ! As day in court, and the judgment is < XEainst him. It is accordingly recom-
 Tended that the proceedings be not re- 4 urned. but that the matter be con : Mded by the departments approval of
The daily morning journal and courier., 1901-12-21

and that the expert had reported that
 the locality was admirably adapted fol | an underground water supply. MT
 Shepard said also that an offer had
 then be made to establish a driven vel
 supply for the city for 1000 and he
 believed that the same men were ready
 to do it day. Of course that would l not exclude the service pipes, but he
 believed that when such a supply was
 established the city could make good
 bargain with the water company for
 the service pipes.
 W. L. Folsom asked MT. Watrous to | state what the value of the Water com
 pany's plant was. MT. Watrous said
 that he did not care to go into that mat
 ter MT. Folsom then spoke in favor
 of a. contract for not longer than two | or three years. He favored the city | buying the plant, because enough in- | come could be secured from it to pay 1 interest on the purchase bonds and to
 place a large sum in the sinking fund | each year.
 J. J. Sullivan favored municipal own
 ership He thought that the city was now in better position to buy the l pldll ludll IL WCulu De tell yedIS lellSe' 1 He suggested contract under which | the city would pay the Water company | $20,000 year for twenty years, the | plant to become the property of the | city at that time.
 George F. Hall was surprised that the l company had offered to renew the pres ent contract for ten years at the same rates. He thought it foolhardy to ex tend the contract for only ten years. He said that the city ought to own it's own water plant, but could not buy it now. He favored the renewal of the present contract under the terms pro- posed by the company.
 Joseph Baerhalter thought that the city would never be in better condition to purchase the plant than at present. He said that he favored municipal own ership and spoke for the working peo- pie of New Haven and represented the Trades council of twenty-three affiliat- ed trades. The working people could not pay any one to represent them as the Water company did, but felt very strongly on this matter
 Charles Gay thought that if a con- tract was entered into it should provide that the company could not charge wa ter rates for houses not occupied.
 At the request of J. Birney Futile and others the present contract which the company proposes to renew, was read.
 EX- X-Councilman R. T. Grant said that the people of the city seemed to be awaking to the fact that it would be to their interest to own the public utilities of the city. He favored municipal own ership and hoped that if contract was made it would be for term of not more than three years. He had no doubt that a great majority of the people of New Haven favored municipal owner- ship.
 Attorney Watrous said that the pres ent rates are in no case higher and in many cases lower than the rates pro- vided in the present contract, and he hoped that the present rates would be