The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1901-11-01


State Of Washington fOt the County of
King. Teckla c. Hughes, plaintiff, vs..
Thomas Hughes, defendant. No. 3289S.
summons by publication.
The State of Washington to Thomas
Hughes:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
hrst publication of this summons, to-Wit
within sixty days after the 9Th day of
September, A. d. 1901, and defend the
above entitled action nj the above entitled
court, and answer the complaint of the
plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer
upon the undersigned attorney for plain
tiff at his office below stated; and in case
OF your failure so to do, judgment will
be rendered against you according to the
demand OF the complaint, which has been
nIed with the clerk of said court. The OBJ
JecI OF this action, set forth in the COM
plant, IS as follows: That the above ac-
tlon is instituted by the plaintiff to secure
a divorce from the defendant on the
ground OF desertion and nOn-support.
w. H. BUTTNER, Attorney for PLAINTIFF
Z. y. address, 513 Third avenue, Seattle.
Washington.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King County
Joseph COniglio, plaintiff vs. Josephine
Comglio, defendant. No. -. Sum
mons
State of Washington to said Josenhina
COniglio:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty (6W days after the date of
the first publication of this summons, to-
VII: sixty (6G) days after the 25th dav of
october, 1901, and defend the above en-
utled action in the above entitled court:
and answer the complaint of the plain
iii, and serve copy of your answer
upon the undersigned attorneys for plain
tpt at their office below stated; and in
case of your failure so to do, Judgment
Will be rendered against you according To
the demand of the complaint, which has
been filed with the clerk of said court
The object for which said action is
brought is to secure a divorce upon the
grounds of abandonment
ROOT, PALMER & BROWN,
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Postoffice Address: 533 Pioneer Build
ing, Seattle, Washington
First publication, October 25.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
state OF Washington, in and for the
county OF King. John Dwight Tired
way, plaintiff, VS.. Guillilomine Eva
TredWay, defendant. Department No
2. No. 33665. Summons for Service NV
The State of Washington to the said
Gullllomine Eva Tredway, defendant:
You are hereby summoned to annear
"illilli sixty COD days after the
hrst publication of this summons. to-
wit: within sixty (6O days after the 25th
Jay OF October, 1901, and defend the
above entitled action in the above en-
the pIalnlltf, and serve a copy of your
answer upon the undersigned, attorneys
Tor plaintiff, at their office below stated.
And Ill case of your failure so to do
judgment will be rendered against you
according to the demand of the complaint
winch has been filed with the clerk of
said court.
4 ne OBJECT of the above entitled action
IS 70 obtain decree of divorce dissolv-
ing the bonds OF matrimony, now existing
between plaintiff and defendant on the
ground of abandonment
Dated, Seattle, Washington, October
BIRD. 1901
HUMPHREYS & BOSTWICK.
Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and P o.
Address: 601-6O2 The Mutual Life
Mutual Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King
Date Date of first publication, October Is.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
state OF Washington, for the County of
hlng. Mary Mcdonald, plaintiff. VS.
Daniel Mcdonald, defendant. No.
summons by Publication
The State of Washington to the said
Daniel Mcdonald, defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
L ILft publication Of this summons, to-wit:
within sixty days after the 18th dav of
October, 1901, and defend the above en-
dtled action in the above entitled court
and answer the complaint of the plaintiff
ana serve copy of your answer upon
me Undersigned attorney for plaintiff at
ais office below stated: and in case of
your failure so to do, Judgment will be
rendered against you according to the
IG GlI OF the complaint. which has been
lied with the clerk of said court
The object of the ABOVE entitled action
IS 10 OBTAIN decree of divorce by plain
III from defendant on the ground that
defendant neglected and refused to make
suitable provisions for his family.
]. P. BALL,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
L. .. Address: Suite Is ROCKWELL Block.
oGattIe, county of King, Washington.
Date of first publication, October q
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
state OF Washington for the County of
Alng. In probate. In the matter of the
estate of Elizabeth S. Gilbert, deceased.
NO 5S3z. Order to Show Cause
Inc above entitled matter coming on to
De heard upon this 24th day of October
l9Vl, upon the petition of Sarah A. Ken
Jail, Administrative herein, for the sale
Il the following described CIaIIam county
warrants. to-Wlt:
1, Date- . No. Amount.
- udry D, 1880 ......495 25 90
october 10, 1896 .......283 en-
November 16 1896 ....... 299 300
,amt7a ~, 5SS1 ;:...'.. .......464 1000
Ky 1888 '..... ..........934 500. 90
Total .....;.... .:.:...... ......... $3.50. 80
A private sale and it duly appearing to
me court, that it is necessary to sell some
oI the personal estate of said deceased in
oluer 10 pay the expenses of the last i'll
ness OF said deceased, and the funeral ex
PeIIoeS OF SAID deceased, and to paw the
expenses OF administration and it further
uuly appearing to the court that there is
Iol SuIIlclent funds in the hands of said
administrators to pay said expenses ana
mat SAID Administrative has received an
oILer from one r. P BarstoW of s50O
"llch is $685. more than the aDDraised
volue thereof; and it further duIv an
bearing 10 the court that it will be for
me pest interest to said estate to sell
odIu warrants at private sale and that
more can be realized than by a public
sale therefor. Pu"A1E
NOW, therefore: 1t is by the court he
ing duly advised in the premises. order
ca, mat all persons interested in said
estate be and appear before this court IN
rludy' the Sth day of November, at the
nour OF 9;5O O'Clock in the morning Of
7dld udy, IN department No. of said
curI; ana then and there to show causr
Il any they have why said petition shouId
-IoC De granted and said warrants sold az
prINate sale, and that a copy of this order
dS published in some newspaper publish
ca IN hlng county once a week for two
weeks, and that three copies hereof he
posted as required by law.
lone IN open court this 24th dav of
october, 1901 ICY u
ROVD MAN