The daily morning journal and courier., 1901-09-04

AlA notNTAGu LO COuEs h'
 Same Familiar List of Charges-NIany
 Suits in the Superior Court, Some ir
 Heavy Damages.
 There is large grist of divorces fol this term of the superior court, and those returned yesterday were:
 Paul Nehring of Woodbridge vs. An ma Maria, adultery.
 Emma Mullens vs. Thomas F. Mul- lens.
 Ellena McNamara of Ansonia vs. Thomas McNamara.
 Mary B. Loughlin vs. Patrick Lough- lin.
 Sarah B. Gildersleeve vs. Edwin c. Gildersleeve.
 John H. Klund vs. Anna Klund.
 Agnes Almira Hotchkiss vs William D. Hotchkiss of Naugatuck.
 Hannah Hawley vs. Richard T. Flaw ley
 Katherine Franklin vs. John Frank din.
 Susie N. Korn vs William H. Korn, late of. New Haven.
 Congenta F. Fibre vs. Antonio Fibre, adultery.
 Sarah Ethiers vs. Clifford Ethiers of of Meriden.
 Olive I. R. Douglass vs. Howard B. Douglass, adultery.
 Mary Pasquale vs. Rocco Pasquale.
 John Bannon vs. Mary Keefe Ban- mon.
 Mary E. Clark vs Robert s. Clark of Meriden.
 Katherine G. Buckley vs. William J. Buckley, Meriden.
 Martha Haut vs. Anton Haut, for merly of New Haven.
 Frank s. Werle vs. Lulie V. Werle
 Lena B. Ramsdell vs. Fred w. Rams dell.
 Edith M. Arnold vs. Benjamin Day Arnold.
 These suits have been entered in the superior court:
 Charles U. Denison vs. George w. Keeler.
 William P. Davis ct al. vs. silvin A. Ives
 Lavigne & Scott vs John J. Tower et al of New York city.
 Katie Lee vs. Timothy Callahan ct nx.
 Margaret G. Lefebre's application for allowance of an appeal from probate is also on the docket.
 David A. Nichols, admlnistra tor, c. t. a. vs Ellen Scranton ct al, suit for division of an estate.
 The First National bank of Chelsea Ns. E. B. Manning of Meriden.
 First National bank of Wallingford Ns. the Strauss Brothers company.
 Robert V. Callahan vs. John Calla- han of Hamden
 Frank Wood vs Frederick H. Carter ct ux. of Meriden. Mrs George Weissman vs. William Nathanson.
 Michael Mulqueen vs. the Fair Ha- ven and Westville railroad, suit for s1,500. Frederick c. Lum vs. Frances De- Wolff.
 Mary l.. McHugh vs the city of Mer- l iden. George McDermott vs the Winches- l ter Avenue Railroad company. Louisa G. Lane, ct als,, vs. Thomas | ct al.
 Frederick c. Lum, trustee, vs. Juli- cite D. Hazel. Mary O'Reilly vs. Owen Brady, ct al. l Winthrop l.. Allen vs. William P. Nu- | gent, ct ux.
 Herman G. Hegewahl vs. George Col l lett.
 Timothy w. Keheley vs. Timothy G. | Keheley, ct als.
 Bernard Shoninger vs. Mamie Wad- dingham.
 City of New Haven vs. Thomas Clerk son.
 George Pins vs. Benjamin Br1mprey. Walter H. Bradley of Meriden vs. Peter B. Bradley of Hingham, Mass. Fannie A. Robinson vs. Mary A. Greene ct al.
 Talcott H. Russell, trustee, vs. Mary H. Greene, ct al.
 Cooperative Building bank vs. Mer- ritt H. Turrell ct al. Andrew H. Smith vs the Milford | Water company.
 The Savings Bank of Danbury vs. Philander Ferry, now of Rochester, N. State of Connecticut vs. Carl F. Stahl. Frank l. Stiles, trustee, vs. Sylvia A. Ives of North Haven. Sperry & Barnes vs. the Derby Beef 
 N. P, Bush vs. Charles D. Ihne George c. Fisher vs. William A. Rice. Samuel J. Griswold vs. the town of 5riswold. James w. Rowland vs. w. Hawes Clark. ! Edward F. Gilpatrick vs. the city of Ieriden. Edward N. Holladay vs. the Oxford ] Brass company. Lyon & Billiard company vs. Bradley { ] Hubbard company, ct al. 1E EALTHY SCHOOLMA'AM. Found Out How to Feed Herself.