The Worcester spy. [volume] (Worcester, Mass.) 1898-1904, 1901-12-10

I
| Town of Oxford; jeremiah l.. Stone ct
al, VS.. Town Of Oxford; Patrick A.
| Fitzgerald VS.. Draper Co.; Abraham
| Rosenourg VS.. trustees donations to
Protestant Episcopal Church; William
J w. Common VS.. the Draper Co.; Allen
| Higgins VS.. Walworth Mfg. Co.; Mar
garet Ready ct ali. VS.. James Mccoy
ern; w. H. Blodget Co vs.. ]. E. Lamb
ct ais; Henry L. Greene vs.. Eastern
Advertising Co.; Thomas j. Leonard
VS.. Charles H. Thurston ct al; Mary
Jane Burns VS.. Worcester & webster
! Street Railway Co. ct all John G.
| Peters VS.. w. S. Reed; Clarence
Proulx VS., Henry c. Wheeler; Mirick
| II. Cowden VS.. Francis NJ. Phelan;
! William E. Horne VS.. Richard Whip
pie; John ]. Sheehan ct al. VS.. Clar
ence Dupont, Jr.; William T. Forbes,
judge Of probate, VS.. John Courtney
ct al; John Hendrick VS.. Riverdale
! Wooden Co.; Mary Ann Kennedy VS..
| City Of Worcester; Oliver lie Clair VS..
Arthur w. Norcross; Charles S. Put
nam vs.. Charles K. Pevey; Annie
Rynn VS.. Garrett ]. Murphy; Isaac S.
Borley VS.. George J. Burns; Isaac S.
Borley vs.. John E. Kelloggi J. Victor
i Campeau VS.. Pierre L. Couillard; Liz
zie B. Dewey VS.. John A. Hartigan,
administrator; John F. Kelley VS..
Adolph J. Soucy; William Knowles VS..
Frederick w White; Peter Panjolo VS..
Bay State Ice Co; M. Emma Progin
VS.. Edward D. Thayer, Jr., ct al;
Beaver Mills VS.. Wendell P. Clark ct
al; Daniel T. Quinn VS.. Joseph j.
Cronin; George F. Sexton VS.. Hamblin
& Russell Mfg. Co.; Mabel S. Calkins
vs.. Ulysses A. Towne; John A. Blanch
ard VS.. T. J. Maroney ct ais; Levi
Gaboury VS.. Eleazer d. Joyneau.
| The following cases were continued
to Dec. 80: Samuel B. Parsons ct ali.
VS.. city of Worcester, Worcester Five
! Cent Savings Bank VS.. Progressive CO.
| operative Association ct ais, Jacob I.
| Cooling VS.. Jacob ROsenthal, William H.
| Buchanan VS.. Martin Trulson, Lars G.
| Gustafson, administrator, VS.. Town
| send & Downey Ship Building e. Re
pair Company, Ernest c. Ross VS.. Fred
! H. Cartwright ct al, Louis Lavallee
VS.. Worcester & Clinton Street Railway
! Company.
The following cases We're continued
| to Dec %: Rose f. Mclaughlin VS..
! Julius f. Warren, administrator Rose
| Burke VS.. LeOmtnster g. Clinton Street
! Railway Company. Joseph 7. Fox VS..
Leominster & Clinton Street Railway
| Company, Charles z. George VS.. WOr
| cester & Webster Street Railway Com
pany, same VS.. same, Alfred Moffitt VS..
| Worcester & Webster Street Railway
Company, Alfred s. PinkertOn, admin
| istrator, vs. Worcester & Webster
Street Railway Company, K. Ella
! Woods VS.. ]. r. TOrrey ct al, Antoine
Yuritcher VS.. Agnes Miller tombstone
| Lumber Company VS.. Green & Hickey
Leather Company, Catherine Holley
VS.. Patrick Rafferty,, Frederick w.
Carter vs.. Leominster Electric Light
& Power Company, c. E. Woodman ct
ali. VS. John H. Martel
to Ton otrTr Of
waived court: Michael ]. Ryan VS..
Fannie Rosenberg ct al. Mshael J.
I Ryan VS.. Abraham Rosenberg ct al,
Michael Walsh VS.. New York, New
/ Haven & Hartford Railroad Company,
These cases were CONTINUED to Jan.
! 10: Albert w. Lincoln VS.. Martin
| Lynch. Samuel H. Niman VS.. Albert f.
Richardson, Owen LAWN VS.. Peter A.
| Doyle, Matilda B. Larson, admins
tratrix, VS.. American Steel & Wire
| Company, Estella L. Marshall VS.
Frank E. Wellington, John L. Wilson
VS.. Worcester Consolidated Street
| Railway Company, Mary Jane Wilson
vs.. Paine
These cases were continued until
Jan. 90 Ira F. Hoffman VS.. Lafayette
B. Holt, Julius Blauver ct all. VS.. J. Y
! Schooner Adeline White VS.. Mary c.
! Landers, Bridget Cronin VS.. William
H. Gero. Aiming Arnakjears VS.. Wor-
cester Consolidated Street Railway
Company.
These cases were placed upon the
Western list
John Casey VS.. Reuben Adams;
Alexis Boyer VS.. Charles H. Pellet; J.
Edward Clemence ct ali. VS.. Charles II.
Pellet; G. Clarence Winter VS.. Charles
H. Pellet; David Foley VS. The Fitch
burg & Leominster Street Railway
Company George D. Morse VS.. Web
ster & Dudley Street Railway Com
| pany; George r. Hoskins VS.. John F.
Wood; Samuel Kesler VS.. Francis Lari-
verre ct al; John P. Griggs ct al. exec
utors, VS.. George A. Underwood; Ed
ward Bowen VS.. Alexander f. Young.
These cases were placed upon the
Southern list
Elizabeth Rossiter vs.. Charles H.
| Fletcher; Daniel w McEndy ct ALI VS..
| New York, New Haven & Hartford
Railroad Company; James F. Within ct
ali VS.. Town Of Uxbridge; Edward
Within ct ali VS.. Town of Uxbridge;
Resale Casey VS.. Inhabitants of Doug
las; Robert Drinkwater, administrator,
VS.. Milford, Holliston & birmingham
Street Railway Company; Margaret c.
| Hall, Administrative, VS. Milford. HOl-
liston & birmingham Street Railway
! Company: John Caves, executor, VS..
John r. Remick ct ais; George S.
| Brown VS.. New York, New Haven &,
Hartford Railroad Company; Darius D.
Farnum ct al. VS.. New York, New Ha-
ven & Hartford Railroad Company;
Adolphus st. Andrew VS.. St Jean Bap-
/ tiste Society; Thomas z. Glennen VS..
Bryan Brennan, administrator.
The following cases were continued to
! Dec 16:-
Harriet Wilder VS.. Metropolitan
/ Water Board ct al; John J. Mulvey
J ,Ts-A,-r
win Bartlett, administrator, VS.. Trav-
alers' Insurance Company; same VS..
/ The Aetna Life Insurance Company;
Elizabeth I. COpp VS.. Travellers Insur-
ance Company; same VS.. General Ac-
cident Assurance Corporation, limited;
/ William P. Johnson VS.. Commonwealth;
/ Abram W. Vile VS.. Herbert D. Adams;
Dora Rosenthal VS.. James Hunt.
These cases were continued
Margaret z. Sargent vs. Common
wealth; Maggie a. O'Malley VS.. Will
liam Shaughnessy; Henry L. Patrick
vs.. Town Of HoDedale; Charles V.
/ Edgen VS.. Ellen J. LeGeyt; Rose Don
avian VS.. Charles W. Wilder; Patrick
7. Carey VS.. II. L. Smith; Alphonso
Daniels IS. Morgan Construction Com
pany; Martha F. Stuart, administra-
trix, vs.. Spencer r. Merrick, executor;
Frank ]. St. Lawrence VS.. Henry A.
Laviolette ct al.
These cases were passed.
Nellie A. Moore VS.. Boston Gas Light
Company ct ais; Hamblin & Russell
Mfg. Company VS.. Washburn & Moen
Mfg Company; Manoog NJ Shoosha-
Man VS.. Peoples Savings Bank: Will
liam Davoren VS.. Milford. Holliston &
Framingham Street Railway Company.
These cases were put over to March
sitting
Henry W. King, trustee. VS.. City of
Worcester; Harriet H. King VS.. Caro-