The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1901-02-22
SUMMONS.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington for the County of
King. Homer S. King, plaintiff, VS..
Thomas Ewing and Clara c. Ewing,
his wife, defendants. No. bob. Sum
mons for Publication.
The State of Washington to the said
Thomas Ewing and Clara G. Ewing, his
wife, defendants:
You and each of you are hereby sum-
moned to appear within sixty days after
the date of the first publication of this
from the Sth day of February, 1901, and
defend the above entitled action in the
superior court of the State of Washing
ton for the County of King, which coun-
ty the plaintiff designates as the place
of trial, and answer the complaint of
the plaintiff in said action, and serve a
copy of your answer upon the under
signed attorney for plaintiff, at his Of
flee and postoffice address below stated
and in case of your failure so to do
judgment will be rendered against you
according to the demand of the COM
plant OF plaintiff, which has been filed
with the clerk of said court.
The nature and object of said action
is to recover a judgment against you, the
said defendants, and each of you, in the
sum of $9,4S4.45 together with interest
upon a certain judgment rendered in the
superior court of the State of California
for the City and County of San Francis
co, In that certain cause wherein Homer
5. King is plaintiff and Thomas Ewing
is defendant, and which judgment was
rendered by said court on the 3rd day of
August, 1900, for $9210.20 and interest and
costs of suit, which action in the supe-
court of the state of California is based
upon a promiSSOry note made by said
Thomas Ewing to said Homer S. King on
the 14th day of February 1896 for IS $50 90
which said note was executed in renewal
of former note given by said Thomas
Ewing to said Homer S. King on the 3rd
day of March, 1892, for 100000, and which
said first note was secured by a warranty
deed from Thomas Ewing and Clara G.
Ewing, his wife, to Homer S. King and
which deed, while absolute on its face
was intended to be by the parties there
TO mortgage to secure said note dated
March Bird, 1892, and any and all renewals
thereof and which said deed CONVEYS TO
the plaintiff herein all of the following
described real estate situate, lying and
being in King County, State of WASH
lngton, and particularly described as fol-
lows, tOwit:
All of tract No. SO, of the West Seattle
Five Acre Tracts, West Seattle, in said
County and State.
And which said deed was executed on
the goth day of September, 1892, and
thereafter duly filed for record with tho
County Auditor of said King County
and thereupon on the 21st day Of Septem,
Der, 1892, duly recorded and indexed in
records of said county.
And the further object of said action is
to foreclOse all of the interest of Won !
the said defendants, and each of Won |
III 'oIU III SiAtSeS anu 10 Sell the same /
under such foreclosure and apply the
proceeds thereof to the amount found
due the plaintiff, and for the costs of |
said action.
Dated at Seattle, Washington, this 9th |
day of February, 1901, the day of the FIRST
publication hereof - d
IRA BRONSON.
orr Attorney for Plaintiff.
Office and postoffice address: Rooms
l1.SO Safe Deposit Building, Seattle, King
county, Washington,