The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1901-03-06

L. the Circuit Court at the defend
} ant in the case of the Territory
} ks. Her Majesty Liluokalani and John
\ II. Wilson for disobeying the injune-
4 ton issued out of the Circuit Court.
4 He states that on February 2 a re-
istraining order was issued by the First
Judge restraining and enjoining John
! H. Wilson, ct al, from taking sand or
gravel below high water mark from
\ the premises at Waikiki described IN a
deed from Kamehameha " to A. Keo-
hokaloIe, fully set forth in the plain
tiff's petition for injunction. The in
junction was served on February %.
On that day, so the Attorney General
4 alleges, the defendant, John Wilson,
4 took and caused to be taken sand from
the premises below high water mark
and claimed the right and expressed
the intention to take sand in large
quantities from the zone between the
D ebb of the waves at high water and the
A flow of the waves at high water, the
4 upper or mauka edge of said zone be-
ing a part OF the beach clearly defined
< by the deposit of seaweed. An affi-
Z davit Of a. NJ. Brown, High Sheriff, at
Y ltached, says that on Friday, February
Y % he was informed that the defendant
. was taking away sand and found that
Y stakes had been driven along the beach
v for 200 or 800 feet and upon interview
D ing Wilson the latter told him that the
D line of stakes was at high water marx
n and he was taking it above that line
A as they left a zone twenty feet wide
4 imauka of the line of stakes washed by
< such incoming wave, but the zone wa!
Y clearly marked by the line of seaweed
Y The First Circuit Judge has ordered
Y that Wilson appear before him at
Y o'clock this morning to show cause
= why he should not be dealt with fo
. alleged contempt or required to abid
4 such further order of the court as may
4 pertain 10 justice.
4 kauai TERM CASES.
\ Following is the list of cases to b.
. tried at the March term of the Ffftf
- Circuit Court at Kauai:
CRIMINAL CAUSES.
Territory OF Hawai- VS.. Thomas Led
ward. burglary; continued from Septem
Der term.
Territory of Hawaii VS.. Iakona, mali
cious injury; continued from Septembe
term.
Territory of Hawaii VS.. Robert Waia
Ieale embezzlement; appeal from Dis
n trict Court of Lihue.
- Territory OF Hawaii VS.. Sang Chin, un
lawful possession of opium; appeal fror
District Court of Waimea.
Territory of Hawaii VS.. All Chong; dE
r. peal from District Court of Waimea; VI
lawful possession of opium.
Territory Of Hawaii VS.. See Tai. bri
berry; appeal from District Court OF Ha
ON nalei
Territory of Hawai- VS.. Kakimurs
manslaughter, first degree; committs
from Waimea District Court.
Territory OF Hawaii VS.. Ikuta assau
and battery; appeal from Kawaihau DIS
trict Court.
-, Territory Of Hawaii VS.. All You; VI
VII lawful possession of opium; appeal frol
District Court of Hanalei.
. Territory of Hawaii VS.. Maulili Kapu
~ and Helen Opunui; appeal from Distrit
I Court of Lihue.
I Territory of Hawaii VS.. All Won'
1 opium in possession; appeal from Distrl'
] Court of Koloa.
I CIVIL JURY CAUSES.
Kahaleanu vs.. Ako, animal trespass-
] Kuwalu VS. Ako, animal tlespass.
II. X. Kahele VS.. Mrs. Anma ct a.
I ejectment.
Lihue Plantation Co vs. kepalai wv
c. K. C. Rookie vs. Ohumukini ct a
l ejectment.
stella K. Cockett ct al. vs.. Uka Z
7 ct al, ejectment.
Holokaula 10 (w) VS.. h. w. Kline
L ct AL, e1ectIHtut'
Knauea Sugar Co. VS.. JOS Scharsc
4 ejectment
! Tam Kwan Sang E. ]. Morga
trespass.
I Hoi Chong VS.. E. j. Morgan, trespas
Hoi Chong vs.. E. j. Morgan, ejectmer
Juan Comes Jesus VS.. NJ. a. Rego,
I recover water right.
I Chun Fun VS.. j. II. Coney, damages.
I William Brown VS.. Antoine Vincent, 7
1 plevin.
William Brown VS.. Antoine Vincent, I
plevin.
Kipola Cw) VS.. Makee Sugar Co., ejet
ment
Kaapuwai VS.. E. Lindemann. ejec
ment.
I Paikahawai vs. Kaai, damages; cont
ued from September term.
! Joseph Scharsch VS.. Kilauea Sugar c
/ damages.
! JURY WAIVED CAUSES.
Kahaleanu Q) vs.. Kama (w) replev
I continued from September term.
] Kuapahi VS.. Ako, damages.
Bacilio Lucas VS.. John Comes Jes
/ damages,
; DIVORCE.
Malalika VS.. Kalunakaahele Q); Ka
for plaintiff; continued from Septemt
term.
Frank Louis VS.. Maria Gloria Cost'r
Kaeo for plaintiff; continued from S.
1 TENDER term.
Mary r. Nakai VS.. Joseph Nakai: +
Gao for plaintiff: Willard for defenda
Akoi Ok VS.. Kaoo (w); Kaeo for pla
I tiff