Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1901-10-05

made before the letter was copied and
sent J VIII add that the punctuation Is
copy '~7'
He also, at the request II Admiral
Schley.s counsel introduced another
copy IN which, he said, you win seq
mere was no correction. 1t appeared
originally as Santiago
The court examined the original pa.
pefs OF the press copies with care and II
was agreed that the papers should
again be printed IN the record.
capt Lemly then requested that all
the papers in Admiral Schleys posses.
SION, bearing upon the case, be supplied
ana Mr. ltaynor replied for the admiral
that he (schley) had no moe papers.
HoDGsON MAKES CORRECTION.
Lieut., Com Hodgson was then called
70 correct his testimony of yesterday,
lie was asked by Capt. Lemly about
his correspondence with Admiral Schley
concerning what the Judge advocate de-
nominated a newspaper "COloquy." The
witness took exception to the use "
the word 'colloquy' and Capt Lemy
replied that this was the witness own
Characterization.
The letters were then read by the
Judge advocate, Commander Hodgson
identifying the various documents as
they were separately presented Nj,
Raynor desired the letters should be
accepted as evidence aud that they
could be printed without being read.
Capt Lemly replied however that he
considered that the letters have al.
important bearing upon IN preeept and
that therefore he preferred u read
them.
While the reading OF the letters be.
tween Schley and HodRson and news
paper articles bearing upon the cores
pondence was In pr0gr s. Mr.. Rayuor
objected 20 the reading az one OF the
newspaper statements as Irrelevant,
I'VE WANT FACTs-FACTs.o
Admiral Deway-Those things coula
an have been printed You are taking
valuable time here. We want facts
facts. We d. not want newspaper arti-
cles. We have ulcl these out Cannot
these matters ar printed
Capt Lemly-TheU they would be in
evidence. DO you mean you don't want
them at all?
Admin Dewey-We want them.
Could they not be pinted like other pa
pers?
Mr.. Raynor-We want eyerythinh
that passed between Lieut.. Il0dgs ch
and Commodore Schlay that appcrtains
70 this controversy, but we would not
Ike this record 10 contain editorials
against Commodore schley. do not
think there ought 10 be printed In the
record an editorial against Admiral
Schley or any other admiral or In favor
of him which WAS never seen by sd.
miral schlay at all. That article was
not sent In any letter TO Admiral
Schlcy re sgys not.
Capt Lemly-It is really a part Of the
correspondence and referred TO- We
do not contend for one moment that
any allegations that may be made In
that editorial against Admiral Schley
are proof OF what these allegations are,
but this Is a part Of the correspondence
and necessary In determining as 10
what was the propriety OF Commodore
Schleys conduct IN the premises
Mr. Raynor. would you take
statement from me now that Admiral
schley says he never saw II and never
received ~"
Judge Advocate: "You have made
that statement"
Mr. RNnoi 81 do not think this
record ough. TO be strained with these
calumnes against Admiral Schley"
The court then retired for consulta-
ton and after few minutes returned,
making the following announcement
through Admiral Dewey
"The court decides that any clippings
from newspapers which form a part OF
the correspondence between Admiral
Schley and Lieut. Commander Hodgson
should be properly read"
Mr. Raynor' May Il pease the court,
there Is no evidence to show that this
particular editorial forms a part or
the correspondence or that Y was ever
received BY Admiral Schley"
Admiral Dewey: Under that ruling
II ought not TO be read"
After the further reading OF letters
and before the entire correspondence
hed been exhibited the court at ]
o'clock adjourned until Monday.