The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1901-02-20
THE COURT RECORD.


c. c. Reversed. Baker, il If property
rights are involved In the decision of an eccesi-
astical 1udicatory the secular courts may gem
orally be called upon to determine the contro-
versy. 2. Where only ecclesiastical questions
such as those of doctrine and discipline in
issue. the decision of the spiritual court is final
and viii be accepted conclusive by the secular
courts. 3. person, on becoming member of
church. agrees that the church shall be the
exclusive judge Of his right TO continue. 4. For
the purpose OF trying member charges of
laws of God, the church is the tribunal created
by the organic law; and member has con-
abide the judgment OF the highest tribunal or
ganized under the constitution of the church. ).
Whether not ecclesiastical court has been
organized in conformity with the constitution OF
the church is not an ecclesiastical question. 6.
effect the standing in the community of the per-
son expelled and accomplish an injury for which
there Is no adequate remedy at law, injunctive
relief is the proper remedy.
1889. Latshaw VS.. State ex rel Madison
in the act Of March s. 1895 acts 1895. P I'D ex-
empting wives from costs in prosecutions under
in said act is intended as nothing more than an
indemnity for the benefit of both the mother
and the child, in the event there is child;
benefit Of the deserted wife. g. Nor from the
fact that the statute does not limit the maxi
mum recovery does IL open the way for cruel
and unusual punishment. 1. An Indictment or
affidavit in a criminal prosecution is sufficient
the statute by which il is defined 3 In the
prosecution OF an action under said act Ii is
error TO submit the assessment OF damages 10
the jury.
Minutes
1860 Charles Meyers VS. State OF Indiana
Wabash c. c. Brief for State tS)
1868. Emmett Braxton VS.. State OF Indiana.
Floyd c. e. Brief for state tSD
APPELLATE COURT.
1850 Cook VS.. State OF Indiana. White c. C.
Reversed. Black. il. Where no particular
clause or provision OF the Constitution is pointed
out or referred 10 as contravened o. antagonized
by statutory provision the constitutionality OF
the statute cannot be regarded as presented.
2. The language OF criminal statue cannot be
extended beyond its reasonable meaning and
whenever the court entertains reasonable doubt
10 the meaning, the doubt must be resolved
in favor OF the accused 3 In the absence OF
the statute enacted should be read as written,
and all parts and terms therein should be con-
sIdered together with reference 20 their connec-
lions and to the subject to which the statute re-
uncertain as to their meaning that the court
cannot discern with reasonable certainty what
is intended, IL will pronounce the enactment
void. s. In Section 2047, Burns r. 8. 1894. the
terms narrow tired wagon and broad tired
wagon are uncertain. and render the statute
$500 Midland Steel Company VS.. Daugherty.
Delaware G. c. Affirmed. Robinson. il.
Where there IL verdict for plaintiff the gen.
era verdict finds the material facts averred 10
tendments must be INDUCED in its favor 2. The
specific facts found IN TO interroga tories
must stand without any presumptions In their
favor. and TO control the Judgment they must be
slstent with each other. g. In determining
whether there is conflict between the general
verdict and the special that the lat
ter will control all the specific facts found must