Santa Fe new Mexican. [volume] (Santa Fe, N.M.) 1898-1951, 1901-12-10
TAOS COUNTY.DISTRlCT COURT.
Judpe McFie Recommended for Raappoint-
ment.--He Did a Big Weeks Work.


The dockets were well cleared OF
criminal and civil cases at the session
of district court at Taos county last
week. Judge McFie on the bench. quite
a number of cases We're dismissed OF
dropped from the docket.
Tn the case of James Boone VS..
Charles Hankins, D. r. Lockhart ct al,
Judgment was given against Lockhart
for $116.55.
In the case of William A.. Anderson
VS. The Copper Hill Mining company,
Judgment was given for the plaintitf
for all the land embraced in the min
ing claims of the defendant company.
In the case of A. Gusdorf VS.. Henry
Pritchard, judgment against the de-
fendant for s311.40 was given, and the
attachment sustained.
In the case of Lonisco Sisneros VS..
B. ]. Young, jury verdict for the
plaintiff was given for $3.50, it being
A. suit to recover on United States
mail contract
In the case of William Hughes VS..
r. w. Salmon, Judgment for damages
and interest amounting to s90S.31 was
given.
In the matter of the assignment OF
r. w. Tandy. an order was entered 10
sell all the personal property and
houses of Tandy for not less than
1,25O.
Tn the case of A. Liebert VS.. The
Santa Fe Mercantile company, Judg-
ment for the plaintiff for $12O was CIV
en-.
In the case Of the Territory VS.. An
astacio Rodriguez, charged with as
sault to KILL Rodriguez at first pleaded
not guilty, but then withdrew his plea
and pleaded guilty He was sentenced
to the penitentiary for one year and
one day.
The case of the Territory VS.. Manuel
Griego Vigil, charged with assault TO
kill, was continued.
In the case of Juan Santistevan VS..
Guillermo Trujillo, collector, the IN
junction restraining the collector from
collecting taxes on raise of assess
l
commissioners on the property of Juan
Santistevan without consulting the
assessor, was made permanent and
Judgment against Santistevan for $751;
Sc taxes rendered.
| In the case of Henry c. Carter VS.
Francisco Martinez Martinez ex'
sheriff, a suit for damages for false i'm
prisonment a change Of venue to Santa
Fe county was taken.
In the case of DR.. T. P. Martin VS.
Mrs. A. L. Shoemaker, judgment for
the plaintiff for 500 and costs was
rendered
| In the case of Eleuterio Coca VS.. Ra-
fael Garcia for the recovery Of some
| alfalfa and labor, a Judgment for the
plaintiff of $40 and costs was rendered
| In the case of Higenio Romero, ex-
sheriff, VS.. The Board Of County Com
missioners, Judgment for the plaintiff
for $685. 40 was given.
| In the case Of Daniels and Fisher VS..
Bachelor Brothers, judgment for the
plaintiff for $62O.9o was given.
In the case of the Territory Of New
Mexico VS.. Charles Howard, charged
with entering a dwelling with intent to
| rape, a change of ve.ne to Santa Fe
county was taken.
In the case of Edward Hatton vs.
The Banker Mining and Milling COM
| pany, a judgment for $362.20 in favor of
| the plaintiff was given.
In the case of George Berry, Jr., In
| dicted for murder, the bail was fixed
at 5000.
The grand jury was in session six
days and reported that % subpoenas
had been issued, 81 witnesses heard, Il
indictments found, in cases no indict-
ment found. The grand jury congratu-
lated the county upon the fact that
there are no professional criminals ir
the county and that not a single case
of robbery had been reported since the
last grand jury session and commended
the court for it's efforts to discourage
the carrying of deadly weapons. The
grand jury also adopted resolution
expressing the earnest desire of the
county that Judge McFie succeed him.
self on the bench by reappointment.
BROUGHT FROM BALTIMORE.
New York Counts, shell oysters, lob
sters. shrimps, mountain trout, now al
the Bon-Ton restaurant. where yoy
I oo,, rot thov,