Albuquerque weekly citizen. (Albuquerque, N.M.) 1891-19??, 1901-10-05
SUPREME COURT.
Important Opinions Handed Down
Tuesday Afternoon.
RESOLUTIONS or COINCIDENCE,

Atfor the tprritorihs supreme court
Tuesday afternoon had handed down
number Of opinions. Solicitor Cen.
cral y. L. Bartlett moved the adoption
I 81 the following resolutions. after
which the court adjourned Tor the aft.
oruoon out OF respect go the memory
Of the late y -. Newcomb. ESQ of
. Las Crucos
/ Whereas. Death has again entered
our bar since the last meeting ~ this
. court and has taken from uB one Of
| our oldest and most respected Nom.
/ beers in the person OF Hon. 8 D. New.
| comb of las Cruces. who was admit
ted to practice here Ia January, 1879,
| and has been present at almost oyory
session since that time. be- Il
! Resolved. That iu the death OF
/ Judge NuWrumh this court has lost
I AN able and faithful counsellor and
! advisor The bar Hn earnest eloquent
/ and respected member. the territory
| 1n honest and progressive citizen. and
/ Die family a tender. loving ami proyi
don't head
That the deepest sympathy ~ the
/ hench and bar are extended Co his
I widow Zen her sad bereavement
That these resolutions ho spread
upon tho record of this court aud q
copy thereof under lts seal br trans
mittrd 90 Mrs NowComb. and that
ont of respect to the memory OF our
deceased brother this court do now
adjourn
~ case no. 500 tirrhort u. strong.
'pI' liahi Na. Maltl, j. Eakln 90 a.
! appellee. an appeal from b"rnaiiiio
county the Judgment ut the lower
court Nts directed % fct aside the
/ luiEmrni DIMINISHING the case. Tho
opinion ia hy AHsnciat" Justice Merle.
/ u holds That the rule ~ civil law re-
Idl"s tho community on properly
married pDuuns ia NOS rcponlod In
New M'Nico except 10y the act uf the
WHO.
in ease No. hIl. an appeal from san
Miguel county. o.. tor, or New Mex
/ Geo. vs. Nipnor Herrera. the lower
court was directed tu utnucC HrrCra.
who had been convicted OF murder
and had been rcutHErod t1 ten years
| ln The pcnitout'ou tn. record N
ibn lower court failed o. shun that
h'frro had been asked D. tho court
before Poe was sentenced whether hr
h1d anything to Say. The opinion was
hN Associate Justice j. w Cumpack.
co..
ln 'aar no. $50 james j. liar.rm7".
appellant VS.. the tuWliors OF Sow
Mexico. appellee. Involving the pTE
mont of taxes, on appeal from Chavez
county. the Judgment ui the llw. O.
court was affirmed the opinion VIII 70
was ht Associate Justice Crumpaclyr
holds thtt tine statute ui limitation
docs not apply ,o taNoH
Zoo Gas" 30. N>I r y Robinson 80.
ihr faiaiino Insurance company. tho
1iFm"ut of the district court was at
nIm'l. Robinson had secured yor
! diDt in The district court Tor s. 500
.nHHf'nc" due him rh" opinion was
h} Chief Justice Mile.
/ ln case 80 $50 the Early Times
DistilerN company IS Charles Zlegrr
ct al. an appeal from the district court
'l H'inaliuo county, involving the
payment of debt the Judgment az
ihr district court was affirmed. The
opinion was ly Associate Justice Nc.
MILAN,
in case No. sos the territory NJ New
Nl'Nl'o W.. Manucla OlEuin de- CULLEN.
hh appeal from san Miguel county.
me Judgment Of tho lower court was
ahtm"d. The woman had boon con.
Nici'l az numbering her husband whil'
hr was outside the house sleeping in
WAGON. The opinion was hy Asso.
riat' Justice Mclie.
W. cas-. No NAn. Jesse $. Gale and
waiter tafr appellants. vs Raymuulo
0HlAs, appellee am appeal from Der.
nnIl'l' county TIE Judgment uf the
lower court was affirmed The cnse
involved tho ropleyin of 200 10 800
sh'rp 'ain'd az $3.50. the lower court
having dismissed the Ease FOR want
ul 'uH'l. cent evidence The opinion
vac NY .'nolhic Justice Merle.
Ease No' N-". Thomas p. Catron ct
~ AFl'"Hlt. NH. >. y. lhughiin, %
"A1 ''"linN'n unll the next term
"ll'
IN case no $50. territory ~ Now
N'Ai'' Vs. haunola Olguin de- Cullen.
an appeal rom san Miguel county an