The Nome nugget., 1901-11-23

Ict u . -a"iU4'
 !t i, a: sn .l ell :. .to, ....n
 language used III Itoscntha V lN,,:
 1. That n the onjn. q o tHat C. | nu Q Oe cuStO.D ,' III ner- Ha, n'VC = sary to .ia,iit the length o~4Aac c.ai n, to eighty rods, or l3- feet. 2. lhat w.thout such rule ol c.is- tom it might be of any length orwidti. . providing un,y that the claim did not exceed twenty acres in aita. In the case at bar the court finds iha, the rule and custom pleaded do not have that effect. and sorentha v. Ives is. hy .ason oI .ha' '.if.run g, an authority a Lain>l the defenlunl. Tow Claims May Be.Located. CnLil corrected by a >uperllr tr.b nal or cCnviced llat us slh error, this court will .ma-nlain: Ihal d miner may locate twenty acre or .e>S, il he desires, rf p arer m3nin- 4roru III ar! .'rin he chooses. excluding unown on'I- me ., laul; hat un ;,s.iIti - rt't. i, la ,it.n O. cy>tO n ;.n .mi4 n. ...rtu form uI niS ai,. Il --".l.,,, length: tha, xay ,uch uc rsalat .,.n or custom i>.voii cor G nlic ..with bJth the spirit an titer o' she a.e, ...ln- ing law.
 kjelsb.rg's $ -Lo:ition -VAI,d.
 1t follow m! .u(gn.cnI, that ,he location o Thprolf k.el>bcrs 'sSa- net void in any part, for, ,-as staked and i l.cated, it did not contain more than twenty acre.. The eviuence does net cOnvin.e the court that he an iGrcnier, ,his partner, ever aaandOned ohat part. -st leasI. in the 'fGood Luck local ion. 5 for they wcrc SD ar rec -r,Ie a |. owners that til, ec.@ an. 4tc. '-. s the con>irersti n,. :t c-. The .ia>, quer, Il ae ..s:h> Or not lh, l,ta.I-u ,:t.> 'talh n. t.ac,i ion uTan gro T ac, ualiy an not riOuSly lhGn in D. t-s.s:L aa G-- verse, ala aimant is vail, trv.lu. .s .ui. answered by the ,an.ua,e of the 5 preme Court of Utah. as fellows:
 1t is conceded b. ahe f@siou' 'en.-. and lL Is doubtless true. .i'ai,a ttwe, two lCcattrs, am a, 2at'ecting ihc,' right- only, me ~ann tcale giuan e.. wh nh he neI r. g. l'{al r,~,t..,ior, t.n1tr ctalm ai r.tt 70. = -Hu >'' ~uru .:r,an IL. b ,a,9aa An., unocoui,.ea 'tIll,.'H, .4,a "a. al .pr = ian .,' riAh. |. sec~lei ti. .hr nu area II 1i- i.dtt. Il ( H. o4 il!i!i-i.;.,t
 a'.t thtt, q tnt icir timt .'htu ,hs " r.1n Ii" wa' locaie! .h> Gim, the rr. spoadent!, ;hy iccator ui ,hG -,sbOn' We're Tn ;.ttua p2,,t,.I,il, stua.i, theu 4hc ue oh;1t {, isnd cc py -le d shan on the .rUtiiId.
 NJ, .oi. .e:. 4s2.
 | on appa |, the Il. tr.ue lu.:t i the Unlled S&a t., thlo "a t Ma .i,- tinctiy. a iir,ned tecause l, Wa, H.l sh on the iact.." El CT, V. BOatnGan, iii U. 5. 356. Unler the principle thus a.. proved by the Supreme Court of the excess over the maxium allowed by law ought not to be sustained .wlthOut it iS taken from thatpArt of the'claim not a tlaily occupied by the diggin.s ol property of the senior locator.
 Fraction Location Void.
 The location of the "CaiitOrnia fra .tion' was,and is void hec Ill ethere was no excess or fluct. on upon which to lo- ca.e; it was void for the fnrtker reason that at the time of it's attempted lOca. ton lhe strip or fra ,,ion was in the aatlal occupation of Thorolf Kjelsberg l his partner and was aactually b ng wOrxel and mined. Findings q I'd decision will be in favor of the p aintiffs.
 N.Ien .r 'G "1'.
 Enough Diacases Now.
 4 San Francisco doctor Is to be hon. >.>I hu fho ErcnCh A~adA,rv ot N.A