The Caucasian. (Clinton, N.C.) 188?-1913, 1901-03-28
PUncfMT PARAGRAPHS FROM
PEAeskfsT sptEctts

This prosecution = p.l.'Ir
quote frUm the eloquent s,-rrr..--..
nom Buncomhc, Mr.. Grs. ~.
uas the author of IN. r'-.ru..---
the Home, from the >I-,h at~.
h. made In support Of hi t.. ......
IL .sy itai IL l. political arl a..
ian AID that your rial our',r..s.
pot named i'm your articles fla,
Isschm,ht l. that ih.-. ode
should IL imIeaci.ed, not i.rah,
they have done, but for What H.,
may her,ait,r do."-F. IL. El-l--
We have had enough rcvu. Ga.
in North Carolina. The l-.r Pa.
have hecn promised I-pce, AMI LEY
expect us Ia fulfill cur rran -
Would In God that some -iruus r,t
ould ii,e up In Moth Chflr,
li0 mp his banner and in.crii- ,an
thee " ord, "thera has bsyn ,i..,t
revolution" Senators when Ia
man ctmc- shAlI lake my stand
under his brnner IL no other n.aa IL
Nor'h Carolina fellows ul..-fr
Secretary of State 4. VI. Cook.
The prosecution says that thu
Judges had notice that the AIpro-
priation for the payment OF Whit.
had been Withdrawn; that on the
l4th day OF June 1900, the D.gs.s
iure ratified . resolution Of inquiry
as 10 whether the Treasurer had
paid any monty TO Theophol.
" bite and II any money had b,.I
paid, up, n what authority IL wAs
paid. fyou meant 20 say that 10
money should be paid to Theopho
lis " bite why did y on not say that
none she MD be paid? Thirty years
sgo when l Was In the Legislature
demand WAS made upon the
Treasurer AID wss resisted. and
no uncertain words, as l will read
to you, that the Treasurer should
pay no money 10 that man on that
claim. Why Was not the LgislA
ture of 1899 as frank In Its purpose
as the Legislature Was thirty years
ago?
j find another thing, Senators
and when j cont. IN plate &c l Say
we have gone far enough IL H. time
% stop-thst on the very day on
which this n solution WAS ratified
aLother bill was ratified paying
$3,1l5 10 e. G. Allen and others, the
shell fishery commissioners whom
the Legislature OF 1899 attempted
to put into Wines place-$37l5 %
the money which " hite had col
Iected and paid into the Treasury
was paid TO these m.n who never
performed one hours service for the
State % North Carolina White did
the work, and you say that you re-
fused 10 pay him. il MAS known
to you that he was doing the work
IL Was known TO you that the.
Others were not doing the work. IL
wss sn old maxim OF Nance's that
the horse that pulls the pillow f. IN
til I'd TO the fodder. You Civ. the
fodder 10 the horse that did rot
ull tbe pillow. You ~ 81, this, d. -
p e's money on men who did , sar
vice, and YOU are now trying 10
impeach Ju' yes who render, a a
ljn6gment in fAvor OF the man who
served the State. IL IL time We
should stop Ex-Governor jaws
Senators, when these same juig-
es applied the doctrine OF Hoko ~.
Henderson for the first time in r.
cent years in the casn OF Wood vs.
Bellamy. and the result was 10 put
. Populists out and install Demo.
Gratis I'm Office, we all prais d them
as learned, pure, nonparfisan judg
es. Again when they app led the
doctrine OF In pari materia I'm the
corporation commission TAX case
, along with the doctrine of Hoke We
Henders n. and saved to the treas
ury OF the State the tax = on forty
odd million dollars OF property
that bad been e>caping taxation.
We again threw mp our hands and
said, Learned, just and incorrupti-
BILE judges who will render their
d. cision In defiaD, Q OF all the pow
rful influence that always sur
round Legislatures ard sometime
gets near the courts Now when
they apply these Identical doctrlnes
In case that happens as a result
70 Keep Democl at out OF office and
keep q Populist in. shall we i'm
peach them for IT.? d. We daree
Tx Secretary of State G. NJ. Cooke.
i Would you impeach these judges
Tor this act 4; they were Demo
lie 1udRes?-Ex- Governor Thomas
]. Jarvis.
Senators, yo1 would not think %
me IL 7 were on the
o'nch and hal done inst what
ihese Judges had donel-F. +. o.
o'rn, Ex Attorney General.
The pros acution il neither lay.
[ iul nor exped emit, Senators. But IL
IL Were expedient, / call TO mind
the words OF Ar SHADES who on one
occasion said "Fhis measure NAV
De expedient, oh Athrnians, but IL
can never command my vote be-
cause 1t Is not just."-L. Lindsay
) Patterson.
+ Mr.. President and Senators. Won
nearo the venerable Chief Justice
Wnen ne was upoa the stand asked
, me question whether any partisan
L or Political motives ever swayed
2 MIN In rendering bis opinions in
THESE fice holding csses, and YOU
2 neafo nm answer no. You heard
the question asked him III be knew
2 IN what proportion OF cases Demo.
crsts had b,sn retained In office
and Republicans and PopuIists re
talned and Democrats kent ont
and you heard his ans yer. He said.
mad no knowl. dge upon this
question until requested by nv
counsel TO iook IL up since these