The Scranton tribune. [volume] (Scranton, Pa.) 1891-1910, 1901-09-18


VI "'s"'''e'' 'oo'' prepared Yesterday
by Deputy Prothonotary John CUM
ninps tbera amman oply civ divorco
cases 1hlS is starting decrease III
the number of these cases as compared
,..,,,. IT.. a.. -,
w" ,.'o"c "Ppea', ,'s o'' '"' al u'''en'
hS'o ior the various telihS LOT 'he
past eighteen months. The average
has been about thirty.
The list altogether contains eighty
four cases. thirtv.tbrcc of which are
rortioraris In witch tho iudouont -,
,n a,aar,,,o,, a,, t,,,,,' ~ r. -
q" "iu'' '''"'' y, Ju"'',c VI ''' p'"'e
's questioned rive OF the cases are
uehurrerS hled Dy the scranton kall-
to quash trespaSs suits because of the
irregularity of the plaintiff's declara-
tions.
Argunort ueol orors Nordav o,t
-, III can ,,,, 80 -, 49, hl ,,.i
~, 10 VI '"''' w '' '''''
IL slNe' peI"N'
Patrick Golden against Margaret
Lyons, rule to omen Judgment.
John Church company against NJ. w.
Guernsey ct al: exceptions to plain
tiffs' bill of costs.
Angus Cameron against Angus G.
Gray ct al; exceptions to finding of
I.
Joseph D. Stone against the Penn
sylvania Tobacco company: rule to set
aside service of bill in equity.
II. Il. Reynolds against William =.
Roland ct al; exceptions to finding OF
court:
| In re: IunaCv of Peter Garvey; ex-
| ceptions to account of committee.
| :. Dawson against L. Dawson; rule
| for decree in divorce
| Myron Easson against G. w. Wede-
man ct al: exceptions to service of in
| terrogatories
Singer manufacturing company
against George G. Baird ct al; eXcep-
| tions.
| Mary Rogers against the City of
Scranton; exceptions to report of refe-
| rec.
| Jessie Eimble against Frank p.
Kimble; rule for decree in divorce.
j. O. Alderman, trustee. against Jo-
seph Josephs: rule to open Judgment.
| In re: Costs and expenses of sewer
in Dunmore borough; exceptions to re-
port of viewers, and rule to quash ex-
ceptions.
| Flora r. Green against Porter L.
| Green; rule for decree in divorce
Kate Mcclure against John Roche;
ccrtiorari
Max Rosenblcnth against NJ. Gam
boil; rule to open Judgment
John Hurn against Melvina Hurn:
rule for alimony.
Catherine Dean against Margaret
O'Rcilly, Administrative; rule to open
judgment.
In re: Lunacy of Jennie Howell; rule
on respondent to pay costs.
NJ. j. Gallagher against Anglo Amer.
lean Saving and Loan association; rule
to dissolve attachment.
| p. J. Walsh against Anglo -Ameri-
can Saving and Loan association: rule
to dissolve attachment.
| j. j. McAndrew against Anglo Amer.
lean Saving and Loan association; rule
to dissolve attachment.
In re: Adoption of Anna Staples;
rule for decree.
George :. Dunn against George May,
| rule to open Judgment.
Mary L. Cuyle against A. o. Cuyle
rule for decree in divorce.
:. Louisa Macdonald AGAINST E,var
]. Macdonald; rule for decree in di,
yorCe.
Connecticut Building and Loan as
sociation against II. l.. Hartranft e.
al: rule to pay costs.
City of Scranton against Scranton
: Savings bank; case stated.
city of Scranton against Lewis
Jones estate: rule to quash writ o
scire facias (No. 172 May term, 190D.
| city of Scranton against Levi
,
scire facias tNo. ia May term. 1900.
Lawrence Muftiey against Mary Jan
. Mufftey: rule for alimony
city of Scranton against James W
4 Oakford: rule to quash scire facias.
Commonweal tn against Matte Shol
kon; certiorari.
, Electa Miller against +. 5. Ioude
, ct al; rule Tor judgment,
Annette Reynolds against Scranto
ana NortheaStern railroad company
rule 10 oppose bond.
n Walter T.. Davis against +. a. keat
y or ct al; rule to open judgment.
Henry W. ferper against Scrahto
liallWdE company demurrer
r.. D. Ferber against scranton Raj
way company demurrer
2 Morgan DAVIS AGAINST Scrahto
RailWaS company demurrer
FRANK \. Mcduigah against II.
{ floNdIui iule 10 SET dslue mere ldcld
2 FRANK n. Mc'uigan against H.
1 howard RUE 10 quash atta,hnlent'
: H. NJ 'aHeItS against - H. Schad
exceptions ana rune ior JUDGMENT.
tomhoh"ealln against Mlchael Lut
% Wig rule 10 StIihe ol reCosnl"ahce'
- commonwealth against r.: J.. or
t. Johnsohi RUE 10 Strlhe OF feCosnli
ance'
'onlnlonW"dllha against Ml'Hael Lul
wig; rule to strike off recognizance.
juliet 'aWley against scranton Raj
way company; demurrer
In re: ADOPTION OF ENelEn % BoNl
rule for decree.
% Louisa Keller against william
- jenkins; rule to stay heri facias,
% In re; Rule on Henry May, jrr
bring ejectment.
In re; Rule on l.. y. Roberts to brir
ejectment.
Edward Whitman against Lor
Whitman; rule for decree in divorce.
l. In re: Adoption of Edith May Han
ilton: rule for decree.