Arizona republican., 1901-09-18

Office of the Territorial Board of Equal ization. Phoenix, Arizona, Aug. b. 1901.
 Present: All members and the Secre- tary.
 The minutes of the meeting of August 14th were read and approved. The Board proceeded to equalize the valuations as returned by all the Coun- | ties in the Territory.
 It was moved and carried to accept ! as returned the valuations placed on range and stock cattle in all the Coun- ties except Mohave, which was raised 1.52 per cent. making an average valut- tion of S10 per head instead of s9S5 q , returned.
 | It was moved and carried to accept as returned the valuations placed on milch cows in all of the Counties of tte | Territory returning same. excepting in | the Counties of Apache, Gila, Santa Cruz. Yavapai and Yuma. which were raisel as follows:
 Apache County. 7.35 per cent, making an average valuation per head ot s2' | instead of s1S.63 as returned.
 Gila County. 3S.69 per cent, making an average valuation per head uf Sz' instead of s14.96 as returned.
 Santa Cruz County. 5.7 per cert. mak' ing an average valuation per lead oi
 SEQ instead of S1S.92 as returned.
 Yavapai County. 7.1s per cent. makin>
 an average valuation per head of @2
 instead of s1S.66 returned.
 Yuma County. 14.S per cent. rnsairs
 an average valuation per head of S2
 instea. of S17.i2 as returned.
 It Was move and carr.sd to acc ap. q
 returned the valuations placed on bee ! ht,IIS rfd Sh f,ua the Conn ties in the Territory returning slnic It was moved and carried to ac-ep
 as returned the valuations pilc"d ul goats by all the Counties in the Te,ri
 tory returning same. excepting in tn Counties of Marieopa and Yarapa which were raised as follows: Maricopa County. 33 1-3 per cent
 making an average valuation par hea'
 Of $2 instead of S1.50 as returned.
 Yavapai County. Az per cert makini , an average valuation per head of
 instead of s1.91 as returned. At F o'clock. noon. adjournment wa ; taken until o'clock. D. m- Upon reeonvening at ? o'clock. tn Board proceeded to equailze the vaiu ? of live stock.
 It was moved and carried to accep l as returned the valuations placed Q range horses in all the Counties cNcer Santa Cruz. which was raised CHS be cent. making an average valuation c $10 per head instead of $5.96 as returned It was moved and carrred to accer
 as returned the valuations placed O g work horses in all Counties returnin r same. excepting Gila. Maricop:;, Sant D Cruz and Yuma Counties, wn, ii ,yer
 raised as follows:
 Gila County, p per cent, making a
 average valuation per head of $25 m ] stead of s20 as eturned. l. Maricopa County, S91 per cent, mak T ing an average valuation per head . | S35 instead of $25.16 as returned. g Santa Cruz County. s3.9 per cen Q making an average valuation per hea ,. of $25 instead of s17.37 as returned Yuma County. 27 per cent. making a !. average valuation per head of S25 in
 stead of $19.7O returned.
 It was moved and carried to accei
 as returned the valuations p'ared Q
 saddle horses in all Counties returnrn
 same, excepting in the Counties of e : chise. Pima. Santa Cruz and Yum; ,, which were raised as follows:
 Cochise County. 1.37 per cent, makin |. an average valuation per head of $. : Instead of s19.13 as returned.
 Pima County, 2.3 per cent. makn t an average valuation per head of g.
 instead of s19.55 as returned. I Santa Cruz County 9.5 per cent. mal $ ing an average valuation per head ( = s20 instead of slS.26 as returned. q Yuma County, 369 per cent. rn;tki,i = an average valuation per heal of z: instead of $l4.6l ss returned. s IL was moved and carried 70 acccer n as returned the valuations placed o