The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1901-11-22

z. o. Address: Rooms to a. RoxWeu
Building, Seattle, King County, Wash
ingtOn.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
Machias Lumber Company, corpora
ton, composed of j. J. Miller and
Charles Niemeyer, Jr., Plaintiffs, vs..
Andrew Streicher. Defendant. No.
33,S1S. Summons by Publication
The State Of Washington, to the said
andrew Streicher, defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication Of this summons, to-wit
within sixty days after the Sth day of
November, 1901, and defend the above
entitled action in the above entitled
court, and answer the complaint of the
plaintiffs and serve d copy of your
answer upon the undersigned attorneys
for plaintiffs, at their office elbow
stated; and in case of your failure so to
do, judgment will DE rendered against
you according to the demand of the com
paint, which has been filed with the
clerk Of said court. The object of the
said action is to recover the sum of one
hundred eighteen dollars and fifty-seven
cents ($llS5O for lumber sold and deliv-
cred to the defendant at the defendants
request, and for writ of attachment to
issue against the property of the defend
ant. BRADY q GAY,
Plaintiffs Attorneys.
POstoffice Address: Rooms 10 to IA Rox-
well Bldg, Seattle, King County Wash
ingtOn.
State of Washington fo- the County of
King TeckIa C. Hughes, plaintiff, VS..
Ihomas Hughes, defendant. No. 32S98.
Summons by publication.
The State of Washington to Thomas
Hughes:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
hrst publication of this summons, to-Wit:
within sixty days after the 9Th day of
september, A. d. 1901, and defend the
above entitled action nj the above entitled
court, and answer the complaint of the
plaintiff, and serve copy of your answer
upon the undersigned attorney for plain
tiff at his office below stated; and in case
OF your failure so to do, judgment will
De rendered against you according to the
demand OF the complaint, which has been
MED with the clerk of said court. The OBJ
Ject of this action, set forth in the COM
plant, is as follows: That the above ac-
ton is instituted by the plaintiff to secure
a divorce from the defendant on the
ground of desertiOn and non-suppOrt
w. H. BUTTNER, Attorney for Plaintiff.
+. =. address, 513 Third avenue, Seattle,
Washington.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State Of Washington, for King County.
Joseph Coniglio, plaintiff. VS.. Josephine
Con1gho, defendant. No. - Sum-
mons.
State Of Washington to said Josephine
COnigliO:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty (6O days after the date Of
the flrst publication of this summons, to-
VII: sixty 600 days after the 18th day of
october, 1901, and defend the above en-
eitled action in the above entitled court;
and answer the complaint of the plain
ILL, ana serve a copy of your answer
upon the undersigned attorneys for plain
tDt at their office below stated; and in
case OF your failure so to do Judgment
VIII be rendered against you according to
The demand of the complaint, which has
been filed with the clerk Of said court
Gstid ie
brought is to secure d divorce upon the
grounds Of abandonment
ROOT, PALMER & BROWN,
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Postoffice Address: 533 Pioneer Build
ing, Seattle, Washington.
FIRST publication, October %.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
STATE of Washington, in and for the
county of King. John Dwight Tired
way, plaintiff, VS. GuilIilomine Eva
| Tredway, defendant. Department No
2 No. $685. Summons for Service by
PubncatlOn
Inc State of Washington to the said
Gullllomlne Eva TredWay defendant:
| You are hereby summoned to appear
Wlthln sixty (60) days after the
hrst publication of this summons. to-
VIII: within sixty 600 days after the 18th
udy Oh OCTOBER, 1901, and defend the
ABOVE entitled action, in the above en-
titled court; and answer the complaint Of
lne plaintiff, and serve a copy of your
| e.iiof'CI upOu the Undersigned, attorneys
| LOT plaintiff, at their office below stated
ANA Ill case of your failure so to do
judgment will be rendered against YOU
according to the demand of the complaint
winch has been filed with the clerk of
said court.
Inc object Of the above entitled action
Is to obtain a decree of divorce, dissoIv-
ing the bonds of matrimony, now existing
| between plaintiff and defendant on the
ground of abandonment
LATED, Seattle, Washington, October
HUMPHREYS & BOSTWICK.
Attorneys for=PlaIntiff Office and p. o.
ADDRESS: 01-6O2 The Mutual Life
Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King
County, Washington.
,o Date Of first publication, October Is,
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for the County Of
hlng. Mary Mcdonald, plaintiff. VS.
Dan1el Mcdonald, defendant. No.
Summons by Publication
| The State OF Washington To the said
| Daniel Mcdonald, defendant:
GU are hereby summoned to appear
| WITHIN sixty days after the date of the
Llrst publication of this summons, to-wit:
Wllhln sixty days after the 18th day of
! OCTOBER, 1891, and defend the above en-
utled action in the above entitled court
ana answer the complaint of the plaintiff,
ana serve a copy of your answer upon
the Undersigned attorney for plaintiff at
ms office below stated and in case of
your failure SO to do judgment will be
lenuered against you according to the
uenahd OF the complaint, which has been
| med with the clerk of said court.
Inc OBJECT OF the ABOVE entitled action
| IS TO obtain decree of divorce by pialn-
from LII from defendant on the ground that
ue1enuant neglected and refused to make
suitable provisions for his family.
J. p. BALL
Attorney for Plaintiff.
| L. U. Address: Suite Is ROCKWELL Block
County,
Date OF first publication, October IS.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
state OF Washington for the County of
Ming In probate. In the matter of the
estate Of Elizabeth S. Gilbert, deceased.
NO. 1882. Order to Show Cause
The above entitled matter coming on to
We heard Upon this 24th day of October
ISOl, upon the petition of Sarah A. Ken
uan, admlnlstratrix herein, for the sale
| Of the following described CIallam county
warrants. to-Wlt:
Date No A.
February s. 1896 ..... ....4g5 ~ ~
| october IS, 1896 ............ 2S2 > "a
| I,r ~ 10 1850 ........ ......299 800
"uIle ~, 1871 800. ............464 2O6O
January 2, 1898 800. ....934 500 ~
At private sale, and it duly anneari ="
me court, that it is necessary to sell soma
Vi the personal estate of said deceased in
oruer 10 pay the expenses of the last i'll
| - octAN NlCCSdS6u, ana The funeral aX-
pehSes OF SAID deceased, and to nav tne
eApehSeS OF administration, and it further
duiy appearing to the court that there l.
not SuI1lelent funds in the hands of said
| duhhnlstratrlX to pay said expenses. and
mat Sald adlnlnlSLrat has received An
oI1er from one X. +. BarStoW of $500
| WuIch IS $5950 more than the appraised
vdlue thereof; and it further duly an
bearing TO the court that it will be for
! tne pest interest TO SAID estate to sell
oaIu warrants at private sale and that
more more can be realized than by a public
NOW therefore: 1t is by the court. be-
ing duly advised i'll the premises. order
ed, that all persons interested in said
estate pe and appear before this court on
rlday, the Sth day of November, at the
nour OF $3.50 O'Clock in the morning of
| Sdlu gay, In department. No A of said
court; and then and there to show c5ITs-,
IL any they have why said petition shOuId
not be granted and said warrants sold at
private sale, and that copy of this order
as puoIlShed IN some newspaper publish
ca IN King county once a week 1or tw,,
weeks weeks and that three copies hereof be
posted as required by law. "
Lone In open court this 9th