The Worcester spy. [volume] (Worcester, Mass.) 1898-1904, 1901-12-10


chased a right in a machine for box
making. the invention of the plaintiff,
and agreed to give half the profits from
the sale of same to plaintiff. Latter
says there has been no accounting, and
that he is afraid respondent will sell
the invention. Arthur P. Rugg OPP
posed the motion for the respondent.
Court overruled the motion for injunc-
tion,and Mr.. Rugg agreed to file an an
swer for respondent before Friday
night.
In City National Bank VS.. Charles
Baker, judgment on report Of master
was entered and judgment allowed.
Hopkins Smith and Hopkins APP
peared for Isaac J. BOOTH, interviewer.
William H. Kelley of Warren made
a motion for the default of defendant
in w. H. Kelley VS.. Walter A. Putnam.
Motion was allowed. Motion for APP
pointment of assessor was denied, I'M
til defendant can be notified. This mo-
ton will be heard today.
The court took the papers in motion
for default in Frank p. GCulding VS..
John Mckay. Motion was made by
Arthur P Rugg.
In Dudley c. Perkins VS.. Elizabeth
R. Hill, in which plaintiff sues to re-
cover $500, balance of account as guar
dian, defendant was ordered to specify
up in her defense. Counsel was In
structed to answer on or before Dec.
%.
Defendant was defaulted in William
T. Forbes, judge of probate, VS.. Wilton
G.. FarnswOrth, and judgment was en-
tered for penal sum named in bond.
Simon G. Friedman, counsel for the
plaintiff in Samuel Aisenberg VS.. the
Mechanics National Bank, moved that
Ia Na 1cfa he Gt
The motion was disallowed.
In Frank Stevens VS.. Nellie A. Stuart
judgment was entered for plaintiff for
sum named in the auditors report.
Elisha n. Bigelow VS.. Daniel Carey
ct al, was continued until the
February term.
Eugene J. Sullivan VS., James F.
Stratton, applicant, was settled by
agreement. Williams & Williams for
plaintiff; L. E. Fales for defendant.
T. ]. Hynes VS.. oliver Dupre, appli
cant, was marked settled and judg
ment satisfied. ]. NJ. Cochran for
plaintiff; Charles Haggerty for de-
PENDANT.
John r. Thayer VS. Helen NJ. Knight
will come up for hearing on motion.
Orlando Mason ct ali. VS.. Baxter D.
Whitney will come up on hearing on
exceptions to the masters report.
Mary o. Thompson VS.. Anne McPart-
land will come up on hearing on au-
ditOr's report.
William J. Buckley VS.. John H
Coughlin has been transferred to the
jury list. The same disposition has
been made in Malachi Kittredge VS..
Martin Murphy.
John f. Freeland ct all. VS.. James
F. Freeland came up on a motion for
hearing on report of receiver.
Wednesday will be given to- the con-
sideratiOn of divorce libelS
The divorce libels of Dana L. Fuller
VS.. Josephine Fuller and Josephine E.
NJ. Fuller VS.. Dana L. Fuller were
marked settled Hopkins, Smith &
Hopkins appeared for Mrs. Fuller and
Herbert Parker for Dana L. Fuller.
In the divorce libel Of Almond s.
Tyrell VS. Emma C. Tyreu, J. R. Kane,
for Hbelant, moved for permission to
amend by adding the charge of adult
cry. The motion was Overruled, and
the court advised that the motion be
made more specific.
A motion to amend libel by notice Of
publication was allowed in Millett VS..
Millett. L. E. Barnes for libelant.
These divorce libels were continued
until January: Julia Doyle VS.. Mark
H. Doyle, Rosanna L. McCone VS..
Henry w. McCone, Rosa A. Reno VS..
Joseph Reno, Winnie C. Whipple VS..
Frederick w. Whipple, Jr., Hedwig A.
Lindgren VS.. Axel A. Lindgren, Her
man E. Bond VS.. Ella H. Bond, Eva
J. Cowdrey VS.. Lemuel A. Cowdrey,
Emma M. Wallwork VS.. James ]. Wall
work, Alice NJ. Ingraham VS.. Louis H.
IngTaham
These ubels were continued gen.
! orally: Rose F. Van Karnecke VS..
Thomas T. Van Karnecke, Frank Stone,
petitioner for nulltty, vs.. Jennie B.
Stone.
Cases in order in jury-waived session
of the Superior Court today are as fol-
lows: Edgar l. Barrows vs. George A.
Barrows, John r, Thayer VS.. Helen NJ.
! knight, Washburn & Moen Manufac-
| turing Company (pettoner) VS.. city Of
Worcester, Orlando Mason ct ali VS..
Baxter L. Whitney, Mary O. Thomp-
son vs.. Anne Mcfarland. Eugene S.
Farnum VS.. Thomas Bailey, Margaret
Donnelly VS.. Katherine Glynn, Daniel
F. DOnnelly vs. katherine Glynn, Will
liam A. Forrest VS.. Eli Belisle, William
J. Cahill VS.. John Callahan, John F.
Frecland ct ali. VS.. James Freeland
Harris Greenfield ct al. (eQuity) VS.
Abraham Israel. William T. Forbes
judge of probate VS.. Thomas T. Larkin
ct ais
The Superior Court with jury cor
vened at 10 o'clock yesterday forenoon.
Judge Francis A Gaskin presided.
PRAYER was offered NV Rev Caorge q
Lawson Of pleasant street Rsn+ist
Church CLERK Theodore 9 Tobpeo,,
called the iUrv. Every man rasnondaS
excent RoziI 8 Pov of his city No.
is iU Alfred RurriII of NTiiford vas evI
cusad Inv The court Tho docket 60
tains $50 cases.
It was called by the clerk. There was
Zere on accoun+ of tba Largo ,I,,,,be,,
If cases +o he hoard
Tho first case fried was NSaryo,e+