The evening times. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1895-1902, 1901-10-07

/ Tho witness said that De he'd not used
/ tho-. words hut that he had referred to
. she matter he had at no tim. placed any
/ Importance upon the expression d
I the T-Nu-.' Those words hr said were
/ used los Schley in q sort OF irritattd way
( and not gS it meaning t0 condemn her for
/ being iu shat position
/ Mr EJyuer mentioned the interview 7u
| thg New York sun" with Hodgsou. and
I tine witness said that there was great
/ deal i1 tnat interview which De- did not
say The witness said that the ealIaquy
B never occurred. aud that me- had SD stated
4 iu his letter Co. Admiral SchI,y. He had
NOT. however. denied the substance of the
alleged coUoguv, but the yerb.aGe used
was mot correct
The DcHUnciatioH Of Dana.
/ Afr Eayu,r then asked why. if the sub
4 stance or the coIIoquy was correct and
only tHD language wrong. the witness had
called f.. editor OF the sun" am cum
/ uriu..u..E Hl.eEguart." and had applied
( other ,uitHots to hm
Commando Hodpsou said d, had done
$50 Iaoaus. oG JEe relrmuy which the
'~ru' II5 h.Hu,J upon Admiral SchIsy.
accusing him ol oowar5ice. and engaging
/ in "nI'nHuE 90 such time with Junior
. officer Tho witness went ou at some
length ln an effort To- explain his position
; ln The matter. how Dee hHG said at oue
! iias That Tho 'yUH.us H-g never occurred
and admitted 40 another that Jha SUBJ
stance OF it .- printed was correct IIa
meant tu ",uN rN. verbal accuracy and
. on. construction placed Uuru it, .ut To-
admit the substantial ...ar.-...E. of fr.
~r.t-tuaur H, .rFurr-f.tf If.f ID ..-..- ...rr..
/ l-r.r splitting OF words
Air EHNger read Commander H.GgSor.~
st~.-m.ut. made some, tfolr .gl i'm which
.#. ."#.
S.nIar said. ~. sr. near rrnr-n H.
/ rh,m uhr SFau.ar9et already" his inn
t. yuu~r rr,. sr...r-r,-l IN rT,.. f,,.,.7..
boats. AIr Ra-.-r also u0irtrG Drr e.,--
eI.I other minor differences Iafyr...r tll,.
statement of the witness before I'artsin
. here. SATURDAY. ET. -s.1 L.. F5F -.t T-
. l,i>. however O." lwneach his y=1 .:,v.
. ia ..,,s...,. ..5 - ',.. yea
yr a.....-.
+ , '.." .'''.'."- i.y stale
+ r...r.. ,......5.. '.-.r ,
..''.' .....'"..H upon tA" same
1 A. "----l. .-.'
60, do ''.- ''-.-
/ sr. p..
/ Do. .--...... pcs i'.
--...- f'... .....
I ...r-.5t n. .-.....-. '-'- .'.... TOD
SD, ,r..,. ..r.r... .- -.i '-''
! tn. ffrr. .rT t..r ,...-,,r,-,,.f... nm
had rut n.,. i.-.--a..,r..1 rro. rr. ...-.-
+,.- .r his ......-..f-..+i.'.. t.-. -.-..-f--
,...- '.-.'" .' l' 'A. .liGr H' Was on i-e
Nr H.rr. ar..-...T tr,..t s. ..... .,..t...,...+
Z was admitted the other should be aI-r.
me court T.iTsc. ana upon returning
+ - g's.'. L' G. ia support
m.r- of Ir..rf,.-r-t f4.......- .-...',.s .-
acm.yyDo s.f This time.
4 At lH.s H"-l, s recess Was tail-a Hafu
'i--.~ '.' ....-~ captain i-.U.E Uau-H-
. .- '' -..t. .---.i-l.-..I Commander He'll
neg lN order Co. question him Gugl his
'-l...L H. 'nt" captain Chadwick $50
+ t-. 81. ..... '. -.tt- -'..E-a l- evidence
3 N.'' N.-f'-
The Afternoon session.
,r..- .r
I -'-'- MANN" l"ph Hp
I the .r.-eaf-n -nll.tiul OF the witness. In an
! swer To- his questions. Commauder Hodg-
son said he Dad written tho categorical
/ GENIAL ol tn. eaIoHuy at the request of
NaHiral 9ehl.,-.
/ Q.-D.a F.A deny Che substantial aceu-
/ Ia't of do" facts set tHrthr
! an ja. contrary. 3 admitted them.
The witness said taa turn ot Jh- Brook
/ lSH was 81 perfectly proper move. he
/ a.N .'t iHi-k sf" H.auEgted the fire of
--' '>,l-- itaa she turned the way from
I which she I'D she would have ra1 r..r,-
/ enough to clear th. Tsxrs
] Cd Ff..r ,....r. .....-r.-
! IA ~ -. ---.. Z. "....r Ei.. nave .iH.g
/ -..- "I''diN HtIIn<
! F.,...-.-f "'..' --at' t'''N Drought six
! tho -rE-f-n -r-f,. -'.'7 nearer