The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1901-02-13
THE COURT
SUPREME COURT.

against, the proper party. !. The law does
suit from spelling a name incorrectly. provided
IL IS idem sonans with the correct spelling ;.
sonans, and designate the same Individual. 4.
A person is guilty of obtaining property under
false pretenses when he exchanges therefor
be lawful money OF the United States.
1875. Lowe vs.. Board OF Commissioners
power of the Legislature in matters Of tax
alton Tor public purposes Is unlimited, ex-
cspt as restricted by the state or Federal Con
and roads of other material, may be constructed
and kept in repair by the State, or under State
or taxing districts created by the Legislature
for that purpose; g.. The act of March 3.
OF 1895 CActs 1895. Page i4s). is not void as be-
ing an unjust exercise OF the taxing power.
wise II or the 9n faefc or o OK see saSt the pemedd rs m unt
come from the legislative department and not
from the judicial department of the State. 5;
and complete jurisdiction Of subject matter.
their action is not subject to collateral at
1851. State of Indiana VS.. Hindman. Greene
c. c. Dismissed.
lication ordered and issued.
l9f47. Morrell VS.. Morrell. Huntington G. c.
Motion to dismiss postponed until final hear
ing.
1868. Indiana Railway Company VS.. John
Fe sar6s 81, Joseph e {: Appelise,s v brief oeI-
Fountain cunts \ s C. G. e4 Ap pp e ssi brief Sfefs g. os Appeilees;
1874. Nancy Stout VS.. James Stout ct al.
Morgan G. G. Brief of appellee Stout ct al. 0).
1913. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad
Company VS.; Thomas J; Richards Warren c.
c. Appellee's additional reply brief Gl.,
1856. Charlotte Durham VS.. Levi Holloway.
Hamilton C. G Appelles's brief o0; Nor
gand c. c. Appellants brief (0.
APPELLATE COURT.
354s. Brudi VS.. Lehman. Allen c. c. Affirmed
in part and reversed in part. Robinson. j.
l. The mere fact that a person allows his
name to be used with a partnership as man
ager' does not make him responsible Tor a
( Loss of time and money expended by reason
OF an injury are proper elements OK damage
ing from the negligent manner In which an
employe does the masters business. 4 A SER
wants act within the general scope OF his EN-
through the servants. negligence while SO act
ing. the master is liable.
Henry sssS; & pfs 6. xfir sastdi H Wiley 70 J.~l. It IS
the duty Of a railway company selling inter,
f fs 4esnIar 'i ticset Offices IN keep an . q ADEQUATE supply
of exchange tickets to meet the demands oil
holders of Interchangeable tickets when pre-
erning them. 2 A holder OF such ticket has
the right TO presume that any member or the
hand at its regular ticket ofices a supply OF
such exchange tickets, and will furnish them
upon proper demand and under prescribed rules.
member of the Central Passenger Association
to furnish a person an exchange ticket when
he presents to the ticket agent his Interchange
eRa9 uc ticket and the fact that the supply
OF exchange tickets has been exhausted Will
not be an excuse for the company to violats
its contract agreeing to furnish such ticket. :
When a condition precedent In a contract wal
TO have been performed by plaintiff. but Its
performance was prevented by the defendant,
condition precedent. s. A breach OF the duty
which a common carrier. as such, owes &c
as nonfeasance: and for an injury caused by
such breach, an action lies In favor OF tbs
PASSENGER in tort; as well as upon the sontrac,
of a railroad company to sell tickets and give
purchasers thereof az needed Information seia,
the contract between the passenger and the rail-.
road company, and a passenger has a right tt
rely upon such Information.
1920. Western Union Tel. Co. VS.. Ferguson
Monroe c. c. Transferred to S. G. Henley, G
il There may be a recovery where the basis
CT aas astiq Sy Is sod %Sn's inja ansoiSa When tsi.
court cannot agree with the existing law or tn
e oeaee the he cause suusn tr Ds e 70 the Supreme Court
along with its reasons for doing Sc, n n
3s74. Newman VS.. Newman. Posey Y. v
Petition for rehearing overruled.
Minutes
1895. John Stellwagon ct al. VS.. William Hoyle
Lake IS. c. Appellants brief Cd.
oe sssN Loan ah' and MHri Investment Company. Msrioi
c. c. Appellants brief.
|. 1855; Milton shirk vs. John n Lip gem 81 Kos
Si42. Mary Warner VS.. The Mier Carriage ant
Buggy Company. Noble c; {. Appellants brie
on petition for rehearing 3d.
SUPERIOR COURT.
Room John L. McMaster. Judge.
cyrene Deputy VS.. City Street-raiiway Com
pany; damages. On trial by jury.
Room flames w. Leathers. Judge.
Fidelity B; and s. Union vs. Edward McComl
Oscar Johnson VS.. Abraham Canary: account
Jury returned verdict against defendant 70
George Mcneil, by J. C. Mcneil, next friend
VS.. p. c., C. & st. L. Ry. Co. On trial b.
Room s-vinson Carter. Judge.
Alfred b. Brown VS.. William Lather ct al.
damages. On trial by jury.
CIRCUIT COURT.
Henry Clay Allen. Judge.
J. d. Bowenstock VS.. August Shaw; account
state ex rel. Maggie Walker vs.. James Brown
bastardy. Submitted to court. Finding 10
tard child and that Defendant is the father o
said child. Judgment against defendant 10
$500. payable 81 per week to the clerk OF tn
until Judgment paid or replevied.
James K. Meldrum vs.. Richard Johnson's Els
ant. Judgment against pIaintin for costs.
In re. Petition OF Peter Roab ct al. Tor chang
Of highway In WASHINGTON township. From
Board Of County Commissioner. Submitted t
jury. Evidence heard.
CRIMINAL COURT.
Fremont Afford, Judge.
William Armstrong; incorrigtble- Finding
guilty. Committed to Reform School for Boys.
George Stewart; incorrigible: Amelia Stewar
files afidavit. Committed to Reform School 70
NEW SUITS FILED.
Sarah A.. Perry VS.. George Perry; divorce
Superior Court, Room l. :,
Alice Thompson VS.. Oliver ID. Thompson; di
vorce. Superior Court, Room :.
Maud NJ. Townsley VS.. oliver II. Townsley
divorce. Superior Court, Room ..
Hanford Conaway VS.. Western Union Tele
graph Company; damages. Demand 81. 600. Su
pericr Court, Room l.
William L. Nicewander VS.. James Dunn ct al.
10 set aside deed. Superior Court, Room !.
louis Boarman VS.. indianapolis Street-railwa
Company; damages. Demand $780, Superio
CeorgeSW jackson VS.. the Monarch Fire Ap
| pliance Company ct al; attachment. Circul
Court.