The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1901-04-07

When the house convened M o.ao o,c,ocr
thls morning Mr ,oIo no,.o1 .,,,. .s..s
MI yn - ,ha ..,..',., ','''Vn '"ut senale
"'A 40 ~ the 'double'header,' be made
special order for 3 o'clock this afternoon.
Pending This motion NJ rty,i,, IT., ~
sonato o,,,or,,,,o,.. w.. '',,t,y e"i'e" up
sN t'N"N"'"E' ~ tue bailas "nurler
biil, and moved tAaF the house do not con
cur and that n free confaranco oo,,,,,,,,,.
lac .nnot,,tai ,1 ,Vi''',''' we
VIZ 'PPplh'cu' inc senate amendments re,
'hstate the commission feature Mr.. Good
man moved that the house do conrur Mr
Ijvelv,s D,,,i,,, ,,....e,,., 49,
me goyepno, rp ptvr"oitu' a. d..
o,, " EoNerhor returned to uhe house with
o@o ~ i ppi ~ ~ ~ ~ permitting uraln-
KIN oY,n 'iiu -, n", ulII tnahneis ana the
Nr N nai.tarS srr 1e Nv, ,l nse.
u, - ,,, ' 1851 ", seuiIr amendments
honsn ~ 80 ''i'u i'ii 'i'! moved that the
co'n, v" m", '"lV4r "hu mat a frec con
H. ''' p' appointed Inc mo
''C On p p,o,,',m y; ~. >.,,
81 - a. 'V s " ~, Nolah uhe mouse adopt-
." co. t ,ur eun III report on the Cal
o. go na' W nlli;
cfo 't -, ''IIu'iV 60. on inc mouon OF Mt.
- Il" % Wv uVuoie nphief blll a.
nper'"a orueL anu ~ lalied' 90 ayes, ~
"" nj, 'Np-tn ius ptlhe required
ne nliltee on puphc printing report
,ro,, co. ~, 0u rt, rroN tuins ior con,
~, iuI lue piinllns OF me laws ana
u.net puu.iE doruIllehts IN return Tor the
vs. ~ ttttuih s.ercot!peu Plates belonging
5 ny r mtabe. rcrolnihehuihg that u be
nv governor snaii approve the contract.
INV tne woIh Sulll ne zone under The d.
IE1v,l"li VI i"e pruning board IL was
auupteI. -
M, Lahc oncreu the Following resolution
IN me mouse;
section ]. whereas. TIE committee APP
pe'hteu ny the mouse ana senate by virtue
OF hpuse concurrent resolution No 2 90
ulake an ihNnsuEauon INTO Tue method.
manner ana dlStrlbutlon OF relief funds at
! GaiNcstoh, uSrd ihe following language IN
lhelr report, 90 ne found on page Vl6 OF
| uunsc Joufhal ~ Marcn ID 1901, towlt:
., we also ionh1 lnat ArH was u general
| disposition. frequently nhwarranted, 70
complain of the distribution made by the
| distributing committees Ia many cases
| the duties OF 9hcsc committees were 30
| large ana so extensive and arduous thar
/ the only wonder Is thnt there were mol
! more acts OF theirs "a be complained OF.
| IN reference 10 the d!ssrihutlon of funds
! at Galveston. the work done there by the
| relief committee was of such largo proper
/ lions aud embraced 50 much work that
/ your committee found that II would be i'm
1 possible for them 10 make ANYTHING like an
| Ineligible Investigation intO the general
workings Of said committed during their
! thrcc days stay at Galveston. While tue
| committee Is inclined 10 believe that some
! wrongs nave beeh none ny certain members
Of the distributing committee yet we do
| not feel authorized Ia alleging chat there
! were actual frauds pcrpetrated there. but
| We do mosi heartily suggest shat there
! should be full and complete invcSiiga
lion lutn tho relief work done at tina. point
We believe thar such an investigator
would consume considerable time. hut that
such investigation should be made;" sud
whereas. The central relief committee OF