The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1901-01-10

not undertake to provide the means OF proven
ton or redress for any class Of injuries, except
sure, or pressure created By artificial means.
Minutes
1884. In the matter of the petition of George
L. Denny for admission to practice OF law.
Marion C. c.. additional brief for State g.
1923. Alpheus Moon vs.: Pittsburg Plate Glass
ton for oral argument.
1924. David Breedlove VS.. Mayme Breediove.
1871. Neil Merrill VS.. State of Indiana. How
ard c. c. Brief for State.
APPELLATE COURT.
1891. Nicer VS.. Board of Commissioners Shelby
c. C. Affirmed. Black, J.-Wher a county
treasurer was elected TO that Office in Shelby
county at the general election in November, 1892.
and entered upon the duties of his office on
the 18th Gay OF September, 1888, and continued
in Office until the 18th day Of September. 1897
the fee and salary act of 1891 as amended In
1862. Midland Steel Company VS.. Citizens Ma
/. A reply should aid and strengthen and fortify
the complaint in all its essential allegations.
but IL cannot amend the complaint. and should
cause of action set out therein with regard to
either the facts or the parties. :. In an action
bank in p q fnreisSS state S9t to which Complaint
a plea in bar is filed. the plaintiff, by way Of
reply. cannot plead the statute OF the state In
which said note was made payable and thus
create a new cause OF action: 3. A reply which
i i such 81 m a radical zeal departure s a from n eqe e eompiai be
cured by a special finding of facts and correct
conclusions of law thereon.
1929. Indiana & Eastern Railway Company
VS.. Mason. Howard C.. C. Reversed. Henley.
G. J.Where a part of a tract OF iand Is APP
ages to the land owner is the difference IN the
value of the land at the time Of the appropria-
ton and the value of the residence after the
strip is taken under the appropriation proceed
ings; and damages which may result from
horses which are being worked on the land be-
coming frightened at trains on the road are
too remote to recover. In such case the Jury,
a oplv oCSacc such 40 na q Oac nc v the natural
or reasonable incident of the Improvement. ami
remote. conjectural or speculative damages can
1861. kuhner VS.. Kuhner. Howard e. Z.
Transferred TO Supreme Court.
Minutes
The Bales Land. Stone and Oil Company VS..
brief B spau'dins' Bla'kf0rd C. c Appeiiees
s4s7. Joseph Ducknail VS.. John Williams. Della
$50, na August b A,dag 1S Is. 3IISs ott; ps MaTiSn for Or
oral argument.
SUPERIOR COURT.
Room John l.. McMaster, Judge.
indianapolis Manufacturers and Carpenters
Union VS.. Albert Worm ct al; on account. On
Room flames M. feathers. Judge.
Elias Wolf VS.. Citizens street-railway Com
pany; damages. On trial by jury.
Room 3-vinson Carter. Judge.
Price Shobe VS.. Charles NJ. Clark ct al. me-
chanic's lien. Dismissed by plaintiff. Judgment
against plaintiff for costs.
G.. Adoiph Wurgler VS.. Jacob A. Enrich ct al.
appeal. Judgment on verdict for plaintiff for
Tanford p. Hamilton VS.. Caleb r. Johnson;
judgment. Finding and judgment against de-
PENDANT for S423. Sc and costs.
Mary A. Blanchard VS.. Jacob Ehrisman ct al.
Thomas w. whitiock vs.. Edward Dorsey ct
al; repIevin. Appeal from Justice Stout. On
trial by court.
CIRCUIT OUR
Henry Clay Allen. Judge.
yocopb NJ Hicks va Emily 6 Erepch'c Tefafp.
claim. Submitted to court. Allowed for s24. 50
at cost of estate.
ct al. petition. Commissioners final. report Of
disbursement approved. Commissioners dis
charged and trust closed;
Estate; claim. Submitted to court. Allowed for
$50 at cost of estate.
claim. Submitted to court. Allowed for s2 at
cost of estate.
Louise f. Pedlow VS.. James c. Pedlow's
Estate; claim. Submitted to court Evidence
heard in part.
NJ COURT.
Fremont Afford. Judge.
Wolf sussman; violating Nicholson law. APP
Edward j. Richards; harboring dog. Appeal
liam P. Herod. bondsman.
Bert Thomas. profanity. Appeal from Justice
Sheppard. Evidence heard in part. Cause con-
tinued. Grand jury report.
NEW SUITS FILED.
John S. Booth VS.. William A. Ford; cancella-
ton of bin Of sale, Circuit e eoSrt pocnow
SaIIie C. Schmitt VS.. Nicholas Schmitt; divorce
Annie NJ. Jeck vs.. the City of indianapolis
complaint on assessment for street opening. SUI
Eliza j. Ellis vs.. Harold o. Smith ct al. me-
chanics lien. Superior Court, Room 3
New York Investment Company VS.; Mary /
Bolton ct al; FORECLOSURES. Superior Court
Room l.