Middlebury register. (Middlebury, Vt.) 1886-1937, 1901-12-13
We LEAVE 1T TO THE READER TO SAY
WHO JUGGLES,"
Who Bobs up with one lie after another

Client steam to run so much as Babcock
Tester until very late in the forenoon.
The work in the Model Dairy was done
before he got around in the morning.
Now read what Mr.. Van Alstyne,
of the Model Dairy, over
his own signature, saws in reference to
power In September when the DeLaval
was running:
1--WE found the power INSULT
Client, and were obliged to put
cutoff in the pipe leading up
stairs to prevent the herdsmen
drawing on our steam at times
when we needed it for the dairy
work, and as the weather became
colder the latter part of Septem-
Der, this trouble increased to
such an extent that one day, with
both burners lighted, we found
our steam entirely out. so that
,ce intended making change be-
fore your machine ,cas put in, and
we were delayed week in order
to get the consent of the proper
authorities. We then used soft
coal, which did not give salts
faction, because 1t filled up the
flues of the boilers, and we
changed to coke, which has been
eminently satisfactory"
Remember this was when the DeLaval
Separator was running and before the
steam enough to run the DeLayal.
This voluntary" CD statement says
further "that the L S. had an expert to
run it." He was in no sense an expert,
had never worked in creamery or dairy
or attended Dairy School or Expert
ment Station. The DeLaval did have
experts to run theirs. Both operators
were graduates and rank partisans of the
DeLaval, and were angry because we OBJ
jected to having unfair and preiudiced
operators run the U. S.
The DeLaval Co. advertise that our
Gold Medal was awarded on combined
exhibit of separators, Babcock Testers,
Davis Swing Churns, and other appara-
tus." The official record reads "Gold
Medal on U. 5. Separator, Babcock Test
er, Davis Swing Churn." 1t does not
read on combined exhibit" and does not
use the word exhibit" in any way. The
reader will notice the DeLaval Co. add
the words combined exhibit" and "and
other apparatus of course, to mslead
in their endeavor to break down the
force of their defeat.
two BabcOck testers, and a model of the
DAVIS Swing Churn, but no full-sized
churn. Our booth was II feet long by
] 20 feet deep.
We applied for larger space, but were
informed that the building was limited
in size and we must be content with what
was assigned US. We had the smallest
space of any exhibitor of separators. The
DeLaval Co.'S booth was 30 feet long by
10 feet deep and contained sixteen sepa-
rators therefore, if our Gold Medal was
on the exhibit, it is equally true the
DeLaval's was on their exhibit, and as
our exhibit was less than half as large as
theirs, will the intelligent reader believe
/ the DeLaval statements that with less
than half the space and about half the
amount of goods, our award was on dis
| play.
The work in the Model Dairy was not
finished until long after the Gold Medals
were awarded by the judges. If the
awards had been given on the result of
the work in the Model Dairy, the United
States would have had the only cold
MedQl, and the DeLaval an award of
second merit only, Silver Medal, as it
came out second on the work there.
The DeLaval Co. advertise "that more
]
than saved in separating" The records
show that
Average test of the buttermilk
from the United States was 100
Average test of the buttermilk
from the Delaval was .12l
The DeLaval was badly beaten again
in this line. The L. 5. proved to be SUI
perior in every way.
The reader must not forget that the
DeLaval Co. have been advertising for
over year that the DeI.aval Separator
was awarded Grand Prize at Paris, but
now admit in their advertisements that
this award was to the "Societe Anonyme
Separator" which company exhibited at
Paris butter extractor called radiator,
and did not exhibit cream separator.
NE refer to the official records.