The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1901-08-01
TT PRINCETON Union: THURSDAY, AUG usT. i, 1901

L9Ol.
by Commissioner Deans the board voted
unanimously to grant the following applica-
| lions Tor refundment of the amounts Stated he
low; PAID under protest to protect the interests
~ Gne owners ana to prevent the sale of the
following described property provided for by
Chapter $50. General Laws Of 1901, for taxes Of
300 ama prior years said taxes having been
previously satisfied by sale of the property
aeiq qnoer me provisions OF Chapter 800 Cen
eral Laws OF 1897, according to the decision of
Me- Mns supreme court in the case Of Roger s.
aualI9r OF ST. Louis county, appellant, and no
E I or the amounts paid at said sale
aoa1 pf zen page or applied for: S. Briggs
1901 in receipt No. 1899, for taxes of 1898. 1891
ana 1879 SIS on eA of nw4 of section 27, town S.
Of Mdagge Briggs as
church Of Princeton, ST.. 60 paid June 18th. 1901
1so5 receipt No. 1905 for taxes Of 1888 1894 and
OF Princeton; Geo. E. Rice. as agent for r. M
steadman: 90, paid June 18th 1901, inre
e egd 1 SG 4g o for taxes Of 1888 1894 and
| addltlon to Princeton Above amounts tn he
tiar ny GGmmssloners warrants at the expira-
In the matter of the petition presented nv
John a. Noble, asking for refundment of the
sum Of SO, paid by him into the county treas
Wy Wy May s9th 1901 for taxes of 1893 1891 and
1873 on the e% of ne14 of section 81 town 49
range 26, and the petition of Charles Malone
asking for the refundment of the sum of S27 81
Paia I by MIN into the county treasury April
sW4 OF section 33, town IS, range e. less l2H
acres to Foley's and 14A acres in Malone:s
aoaltl nc to Bridgman together with the further
sum sun OF sll67 paid into the county treasury by
sald Charles Malone May 18th, 1901, for taxes of
| 1888 on Is acres in the northwest corner of the
nW4.of seq and lots and in section 2, town
*, range 70: both" OF the above petitions al
leglng that all of said taxes had been previ-
Gonsiy sat asd by sale under the provisions of
Chfapter 29o General Laws of 1897, and that no
Refinement nt1d OF the amounts paid at said sale
! had ever been made or applied for. The board
having inquired into the. truth of the facts as
aileged IN said petitions, and being satisfied
tHat a.! Inc 1acts affecting the cases were fully
| ana falrly stated, the said petitions were SO
certified to the State auditor for approval
On the petition Of Frank Wanberg, asking to
| be set off from school district No. to school
was made: WI Ae Ing
Whereas, a petition signed by Frank Wan
school district No. in this county With the
approval of the county superintendent en-
aorsea tn ne! representing that he is the
owner OF the following described lands situate
OF the southeast quarter of section twenty-one
V toTns hb}ct thi5rtysix 49, twenty
No.. 10, and asking that he, with his said
lands. may be set off from said district No. 5 to
said adjoining district No. 10 for the following
reasons: That the distance from his residence
| to the school house in school district No, is
| too far for small children to travel, being one
ana three:fourths miles, while the school house
| IN schoo! district No 10 is only one-half mile
distant from his residence, was presented to
| the board of county commissioners of Mile
Iln county: Minnesota, at a session OF said
| for the action of said board thereon
Now therefore, it is ordered that said petit
ton VIII be heard by this board at the session
thefeot commencing on the 21st day of August
| A. D: 1901, at the Office of the COUNTY auditor
! in said county.
And it is further ordered, that notice of time
and place Of such hearing be given by posting
a copy of this order in one public place in each
| of the school districts to be affected by said
petition and by handing to and leaving with
sonally copy of this order, at least ten DAYS
before the time appointed for such hearing
Chairman Board of County ICON "Reminiscences
OF Mile Laos County, MINI.
2. E. WHITNEY. County Auditor and ex
on TSea1 I1erA Oh 6oaro:
signed by Gust kjellberg and Others order for
made as follows:
County of Mile Laos. S.
Whereas, on the 18th day of April. 1901, a pc
tltlon signed by twenty-four freeholders of said
county was presented to us praying for the lay
ing out OF a highway running into more than
one town OF said county, and not within the
limits is OF any incorporated city. and described
Beginning at the northwest IN W. corner of
sectlon thirty l3O, township thirty EIGHT 49,
range tWenty-slx (26), and running thence north
on the town line between town thirty-eight C3s).
range twenty-six C26), and town thirty-eight
(3S). range twenty-seven (2D, for distance of
roads as ooW Wits the Boc a mih aea
road: with the Borgholm South Milaca road:
and with the county road running north from
Bogus Brook and Milo townships. and termin-
BOrphOm South Mi1ac1
near the northwest corner of section thirty-one
9D, town thirty-eight (38). range twenty-six
said county having determined that in the
Judgment of majority of its members said pc
titlon is reasonable on it's face;
It is hereby ordered, that hearing be had
on said petition at Princeton, in said county,
on Wednesday, the 2lst day Of August. 1901, at
&c, clock ; F: NJ at WHICH time and place said
OF. and against, the granting of said petition.
1t is further ordered, that George H. Deans
this board, be and they hereby are appointed
committee to examine said proposed route of
SAID road: and make report thereof at said
meeting of said board hereinbefore specified
and that notices hereof be given and nosted as
provided by law
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
of Mile Laos County Minnesota.
BY l.. S. LIBBY, Chairman.
p. E. WHITNEY, County Auditor
In the matter of the petition for vacation of
portion OF a certain highway, the following or
der for hearing and appointment of committee
was made:
STATE OF MINNESOTA
County of Mile Laos. (ss'
Whereas, on the 18th day of April, 1901, Pc
tition signed by twenty-four freeholders of
said county was presented to us praying for the
vacation of highway running into more than
one town OF said county, and not within the
units OF any incorporated city. and described
as follows;