The Jersey City news. (Jersey City [N.J.]) 1889-1906, 1901-07-09
7n,on weehawken, Kearny. for the

x,1,oraoc From such examination and
,uouiry it further appears to the satisiac-
tion of this Board that the values OF TIE
nropertv contained in the duplicate OF
Joseph Kennel, the assessor from the
taxing district of North Bergen is rela-
lively less than the value of the other
property in the county, as such properly
is returned to this Board and valued py
the other Assessors, except the values
returned by the assessors from the taxing
districts of West Hoboken, Town OF west
New York, Town of Union, Weehawken,
kearny and Bayonne, for the properly
therein; and
Whereas, From such examination ana
inquiry it further appears to the salts
tactlon of this Board that the values OF
the property contained in the duplicate OF
Edward McDermott the assessor from the
taxing district of West HoboIen, is rela-
lively less than the value of the other
property in the county as such property
is returned to this Board and valued py
the other assessors, except the values re-
turned by the assessors from the taxlns
districts of Town of West New York,
Town of Union, Weehawken, kearny'
Bayonne and North Bergen, for the prop
erty therein; and
Whereas, From such examination II
further appears to the satisfaction OF TINS
Board that the values of the property
contained in the duplicate of James j.
Bowe, the Assessor from the taxing dis
trict of the Town Of West New York, is
relatively less than the value of the other
property in the County, as such property
is returned OF his Board by the other
Assessors, except the values returned by
the Assessors from the taxing districts OF
Town of Union, Weehawken. Kearny,
North Bergen, Bayonne and West Hobo
ken, for the property therein; and
Whereas, From such examination and
inquiry it further appears to the salts
faction of this Board, that the values OF
property contained in the duplicate OF
August Hoppe the Assessor from the
taxing district of the Town of Union, Is
relatively less than the value of the
other property in the county as such
property is returned OF this Board, and
valued by the other Assessors, except the
values returned by the Assessors from
the taxing districts of Weehawken,
Kearny. Bayonne, North Bergen, west
Hoboken and Town of West New YORK,
for the property therein; and
Whereas From such examination and
inquiry it further appears to the salts
faction of this Board that the values OF
the property contained in the duplicate OF
John NJ Hannah, the Assessor from the
taxing district of Weehawken, is relative
ly less than the value of the other prop
erty in the county, as such property Is
returned to this Board, and valued by the
other Assessors, except the values return
ed by the Assessors from the taxing dis
tricts of Kearny, Bayonne, North Bergen,
West Hoboken, Town of West New York
and Town of Union, for the property
therein; and
Whereas. From such examination and
inquiry it further appears to he satisfac-
ton of this Board. that the values of the
property eontainea4in the duplicate of
William Green, the Assessor from the tax
ing district of Kearny, is relatively less
than the value of the other property In
the County, as such property is return
ed to this Board and valued by the other
Assessors, except the values returned by
the Assessors. from the taxing districts OF
Bayonne, North Bergen, West Hoboken,
Town of West New York, Town of Union
and Weehawken, for the property there
in; and
Whereas, For the purpose of fixing and
adjusting the due proportion and quota
of the taxing districts of Bayonne, North
Bergen, West Hoboken, Town of West
New York, Town of Union, Weehawken
and Kearny, of the burdens of taxation
for county purposes and of equalizing all
the assessments from the different taxing
districts throughout the county, it is in
the Judgment of this Board just and pro-
per to add to the duplicate of ratables
returned from the taxing district of Bay
onne. to wit:-The additional sum of
seven hundred thousand one hundred and
one dollars (s7OO,101.)
And to the duplicate of ratables returned
from the taxing district of North Bergen
ten Q0) per cent. of the amount of such
ratables so returned from said taxing dis
trict of North Bergen to wit:-The addi-
tional sum of three hundred and thirty
three thousand, six hundred and ten dol
lars $685. 610)
And to the duplicate of ratables return
ed from the taxing district of West Hobo
ken twenty (2O per cent of the amount
of such ratables so returned from said
taxing district of West Hoboken, to witt
The additional sum of one million, two
hundred and eighty-eight thousand. five
hundred and fifty-four dollars (s1,2SS,554)
And to the duplicate of ratables return
ed from the taxing district of the Town
of West New York sixteen q6) per cent.
of the amount of such ratables so re-
turned from said taxing district of the
Town of West New York, to wit:-The
additional sum of three hundred and
eishty-four thousand two hundred and
eighty-eight dollars ($3S4, ,2Ss.)
And the duplicate of ratables returned
from the taxing district of the Town of
Union, nine (9) per cent. of the amount
of such ratables so returned from said
taxing district of the Town of Union, to
wit.-The additional sum of three hun
dred and ninety thousand, six hundred
dollars s(990, 0,600)
And the duplicate of ratables returned
from the taxing district of Weehawken,
twenty (20) per cent. of the amount of
such ratables so returned from said tax
ing district of Weehawken, to wit:--The
additional sum of seven hundred and
forty-three thousand, nine hundred and
thirty dollars (s745, ,s3O.)
And to the duplicate of ratables re-
turned from the taxing district OF Kear-
ny, ten (1W per cent of the amount of
such ratables so returned from said tax