The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1901-08-02
TERM
OF COURT

| ~ VII
| Continued from Page %
plaintiff. Thurston, Robertson & wilder
| for defendant
/ Sing Chap Company v. New Zealand
Insurance Company, assumpsit: Maeoon
and Thompson for plaintiff. Thurston
! Robertson & Wilder for defendant.
w. j. England v. M. c. Amana, as
sumpsit; w. o. Smith and Mead for
| plaintiff.
| +. j. Cabral V. n. ]. LUZ, damages:
appeal from District Court of Honolulu:
Vivas for plaintiff, Magoon & Thomn
son for ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
/ George B. Curtis " S. Ehrlich. assump-
| sit; appeal from District Court of Homo
lulu; Vivas for plaintiff, C. Brown for
acknowledgement
| Sylvano de Nobrega v. M G. Silva, as
| sumpsit; appeal from District Court OF
Honolulu; De Bolt for plaintiff-appellant.
Correa for defendant
Honolulu investment Co.. Ltd. v. Helen
Roland ct al, quieting title; Davis for
plaintiff, Smith, Mead, Neumann. yfyas
and Kinney, Ballou & McClanahan for
defendants
Kwong Now v. Kiliona, ejectment:
Brooks for plaintiff
i Sing Chan Co. v. Insurance Company
of North America, assumpsit; Hatch &
Snliman for plaintiff. Thurston, Robert
son & Wilder for defendant.
Sing Chan Co. v. Alliance Assurance
Company, assumpsit; Hatch & Silliman
for plaintiff, Thurston, Robertson & Will
l der for defendant.
Sing chan Co. v. The Svea Insurance
Co., assumpsit; Hatch & Silliman for
plaintiff. Thurston, Robertson & Wilder
for defendant.
| Sun Lung v. Insurance Company of
North America, assumpsit; Magoon and
Thompson for plaintiff, Thurston, Rob-
lertson & Wilder for defendant
Lee Tung and Dorothea L. Emerson "
Insurance Company of North America
lassumpsit; Magoon and Thompson for
plaintiffs, Thurston, Robertson & Wilder
for defendant.
Kwong Lee Yuen & Co. " Alliance AS
surance Co., assumpsit; Hatch & SILL
man for plaintiff, Thurston, Robertson &
Wilder for defendant.
Kwong Lee Yuen & Co. " Caledonia
Insurance Company, assumpsit; Hatch &
Silliman for plaintiff Thurston, Robert
Ison & Wilder for defendant.
Kwong Lee Yuen e Co. ". Alliance AS
surance Co., assumpsit; Hatch & Sill
man for plaintiff, Thurston, Robertson &
Wilder for defendant.
Kwong Lee Yuen & Co. v. Manchester
Fire Insurance Co., assumpsit; Hatch &
4 Silliman for plaintiff, Thurston, Robert
son & Wilder for defendant.
II Wa Lee v. Manuel Correa, damages:
Magoon & Thompson for plaintiff An
drews, Peters & Andrade for defendant.
/. r. Burns v. Mutual Telephone Com
Ipany, damages; appeal from District
Court of Honolulu; Magoon and Thomp-
I son for plaintiff, Hankey for defendant
appellant.
81 John Cook v. Colt Hebron assumpsit;
i Davis for plaintiff De Bolt for defend
ant.
j Robert Lishman v. Hawaiian Gazette
Co., libel; Holmes & Stanley for plain
, tiff, Andrews, Peters & Andrade for de-
PENDANT.
James Aud ct al. v. Oahu Lumber and
/ Building Co. ct al. ejectment; c.. Brown,
s Atkinson & Judd for plaintiffs, Magoon
& Thompson and Thayer for defend
ants.
Wong Shuey v. S. E. Woolley, trespass;
Whiting & Robinson for plaintiff, Rob
. ertson & Wilder for defendant.
Keoni A Puuki ". Lot K. G. Lane, as
4 sumpst Robertson & Wilder. for plain
/ tiff Stewart for defendant.
John d. Paris v. J. A. Magoon, admin
I istrator, assumpsit; Kinney, Ballou &
McClanahan for plaintiff, Magoon q
Thompson for defendant.
Moritz A. Rose v. Chang Kim ct al, as
sumps:t; Magoon & Thompson for plain
tiff, Andrews, Peters Andrade for de-
PENDANTS.
Hawaiian Trust and Investment Co.
Ltd. v. Annie Barton ct al, ejectment
| Kinney. Ballou & McClanahan for plain
tiff. Davis, Hatch & Sillman, Holmes
| Stanley for defendants.
Hawaiian Tramways Co.,-Ltd., v. T. 3
Southwick ct al, debt; Holmes & stan
Hey for plaintiff, Kinney, Ballou & NC
4 | Clanahan for defendants.
Wilder,s Steamship Co. v. w. H. Fam
i assumpsft; Kinney. Ballou & Mechanism
for plaintiff, Neumann for defendant.
Lee Wee Yin " Kwong NOW SINS
4 Company, assumpsit; appeal from Dls
= trict Court of Honolulu; BROOKS 10
plaintiff. Neumann for defendant-appei
i liant.
Ian Kong, v. Kwong Now Sing Com
Ipany, assumpsit; appeal from Dislr ie.
d Court of Honolulu; Brooks for plaiIeiii
Neumaun for ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.
Tong Kau ". Kwong Now sing com
= panv assumpsit; appeal from Dlstilc
i Court of Honolulu: Brooks for piaintiH
4 Neumann for notwithstanding.
Il Manuel da Quadros v. w. F. Frear
ial., suit for abatement of nuisance rus os
tsel for plaintiff. Robertson q "ioei ~
defendants.
ieiectment: Dickey for plaintiff, Andrews
Peters & Andrade for defendant.
zee Wo " Lam Zip, assumpsH' ap
q neal from District Court of Honolulu
paterson e. Matthewmann for pla1ntih
Davidson for defendant-appellant.
David Kaolelopono v. K L. kalei, ia ia IA n,
ages; Magoon and Thompson ior p sa
tiff Andrews, Peters & Andrade for oe
% PENDANT. poo 70
. TbopoaS MorriSSey ". Joseph fNoSo, -
plevin; appeal from District Coul court - =
Honolulu; De Bolt 1or piiin p.
Chiuingworth for defendant.
G. Lai young v. Sophie Kohuole Wli e
ct al. ejectment; Dickey for eeaI plalnslh
Magoon and Thompson for defenda aisc,
Il g. All Pau v. Wong Kwai ct al, e1ee'
, ment. Dickey for plaintiff Magoon an
THOMPSON for defendants.
Honolulu Stock Yards Co., L for y II
G ,ee Ael M, e. Johnson for defendant
e n. Comes Honreco V. Antonio J. Lop ,,
t-asr.,ss. De Bolt for plaintiff, Andre"
E