The Worcester spy. [volume] (Worcester, Mass.) 1898-1904, 1901-10-15
Long Docket Called by Assistant
Clerk Macomber and Cases
Assigned For Trial or Record
Made of Their Disposition
CASSIDY VS.. C0RBIN
ARGUED ON MOTION
The Case Was Brought on a Bill
in Equity and Has a Bearing on
Corbin VS.. Cassidy = Judge
LaWton Reserved Decision to
Consider Points of Law Raised

The docket was called by Assistant
Clerk William w. Maeomber before the
October term of the jury waived SEES
sion OF the Superior Court, yesterday
morning, Judge Frederick M. Lawton
of Lowell presiding. The following
cases were postponed to the November
term:
The Wright & ColtonWire Cloth Com
pany VS.. the New England Telephone
& Telegraph Company, John R. ThayeI
VS.. Helen M. Knight, Ware National
Bank VS.. q. A. Hubley ct ais ct IT,,
Michael McGill!cuddy VS.. Howard,
Crosby & Co. ct ais, trustees, William
J. CahilI VS.. John Callahan, Herbert e.
Cummings, trustee, VS.. Lydia t. New
ton, William H. Blodget Company VS.
]. E. Lamb, Charles E. Pratt ct all
equity VS.. the Grafton Electric Com
pany, John McAvoy VS.. A. ]. Callum,
appellant, Lizzie t. Hosmer VS.. Ell
bridge G. Whitney, Charles H. Farmer
vs. Reliable Underwear Company (after
other assigned cases), two cases, Emily
L. Beaudry VS.. the Slater Wooden Com
pany, Josephine Bjorkman VS.. Annie
c. Erizken, appellant, Mary Tobin, ad-
ministratrix, VS.. Spencer Savings Bank,
Charles e. Wallis ct al, administrators,
vs. John P McGif.
The following cases were assigned
to the December term: Northwestern
Iron Company VS.. Worcester Brewing
Company ct ais, Congress Construction
Company VS.. Worcester Brewing Com
pany.
The following cases were settled:
Louise Chamberlain, Administrative, VS..
Peoples Savings Bank, John r. Han
non ct al. vs.. Frank Gates, Frank q.
Burt VS.. E. S. Snow, Munson D. Par
dee VS.. Lucius ]. Bassett, F. E. Burt
VS.. e. T. Snow.
The following cases were assigned
for trial. Alice I. Carr equity VS..
Esther z. Ashworth, John D. Barrett
VS.. Emily L. Beaudry, William Tebo
VS.. Michael ]. Foley, jeremiah S. Sulli-
van equity VS.. John T. Tank, Alice
Schwartz VS.. 2. A. Hubley, appellant,
C. A Cross & Co., Incorporated, VS..
Bower & Bartlett Company, Margaret
L. Pratt VS.. ]. R. Kane, administrator.
These cases were continued: Jesse A.
Taft VS.. Albert F. Henry ct al, George
E. Mitchell VS.. Nicholas R. Power,
Charles A Blake VS.. oliver w. Nc
Intyre.
The case of Milton M. Favor petit
toner for heirs, VS.. Michael j. Ryan,
was assigned for hearing before W. y.
Sibley as auditor. Thomas Wheeler,
appellant, VS.. Patrick B. Kelly, was
assigned for hearing to c. F. Baker as
auditor. T. j. Hynes VS.. oliver Dupre,
appellant was set down for argument.
In the case of John H. Downey VS..
Fred ]. Cook-E. S. Hill and W. A.
Gile for plaintiff, ThaYer & Rugg for
Observation-Disclosures for $50 without
costs was entered for the plaintiff, by
agreement of counsel
In Abraham Potosofsky VS.. Warren
Alexander, appellant, judgment for 81
was entered by agreement for plaintiff.
Sullivan & O'Connell and j. F. Timon
w. E. Sibley
William H. Cassidy (equity) VS..
George S. Corbin, was argued on motion
to amend The cause had a bearing
on George S. Corbin VS.. William H. Cas-
sidy. The arguments occupied most of
the afternoon. Judge Lawton reserved
his decision, saying that he needed time
to consider the points of law raised
by w. A. Gile for Cassidy and John
S. Gould for Corbin. The case was to
have come up for trial today, but
will not The action arises from the
purchase of a certain wood lot, the
title of which was given to Cassidy,
while Corbin hired choppers, removed
and sold the wood. Plaintiff claimed
that there was no remedy in law and
asked for a bill in equity. Defendant
alleged that the matter had been ap-
pealed to the Supreme Court and could
not be brought back to the jurisdiction
of this court for the purpose of the
plaintiff.
Clemence NJ. Peters VS.. Oscar ].
Peters, libel for divorce, was heard
before Judge Frederick NJ. Lawton in
the jury-waived session of the SUI
perior Court, yesterday afternoon. Mrs.
Peters was represented by W. A Gile.
She told of her marriage May 26, 1897,
shortly after which her husband be-
gan to drink heavily. She alleged he
failed to support her. Her testimony
was corroborated by her mother and
by Mary A. Potter of Woonsocket. Mr..
Giles witness to show service on the
defendant was not present, and the
hearing was suspended until the wit
ness can appear.