The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1901-09-04

tons will have been received by Mr..
Dunno.
In the afternoon Judge Gear was oc-
cupied with the hearing of a Chinese
land case, which will be taken UP again
this morning.
JUDGE LITTLE'S COURT.
Judge Little held a brief session of
court yesterday morning, and also an
nounced his Intention of clearing the
calendar of cases in which Judge Gear
is disqualified. These cases are as fol-
lows:
S. Ahuni VS.. Annie Waller ct al. ].
p. Mendonca VS.. Geo. Markham Rosa
mond Naylor VS.. Orpheum Co, Mace
Bonville VS.. Orpheum Co, Honolulu
Investment Co. VS. NJ Koii Unauna,
Oki & Oki Co. VS.. Wilson & White
house ct al, J. L. Rowland VS.. Byron
Gazette Co, Eugene Avery VS.. w. c.
King, Henry Zerbe VS.. Honolulu To-
bacco Co, E. O. Hall & Son VS.. Pala-
wal Valley and Upland Development
Association, David Dayton, guardian,
vs.. Helen K. Roland ct al, Honolulu
Investment Co. VS.. Helen K Roland ct
ais, John Cook VS.. E. Colt Hebron,
Hawaiian Trust Co. VS.. Benton, John
Loeffler VS.. Palama Cooperative Gro
Gerry Co, T. w Hebron VS.. Charles 7.
Helm, Ropert VS. Kauai Z. H. F. VOL
ter rs. F. HI. Redward, G. F. Gouveia
rs. 7. r. Walker ct ais, trustees, Rita
{. Tewksbury VS.. Irving Q. Tewksbury
WILL KEEP THINGS HUMMING.
Judge Little announced a program
yesterday morning which will keep
things humming during the twelve
DAYS he will hold court here. He told
ha OF M he inf da6 tn hn1
three sessions, one from 9 to II a m,
then from 1870 to 6 pm, and a night
session from to midnight and later if
necessary. Some of the attorneys did
not relish the idea, and didn't think the
court could stand the strain, but he
stated that there would be no trouble
on his part if the attorneys and jury
did their share of theNwork.
The case Of Ahmi VS.. Annie Waller
ct al, is set for this morning before
Judge Little. Judge Gear will hear
criminal cases.
MACON SUED AGAIN
j. Alfred Magoon is made defendant
in another suit to terminate a spend
thrift trust wherein he is guardian, and
allegations made are very similar to
those made in the Love case The pc
titioner is Rebecca Panee Hanaku. Ma
COON is cited to appear September 18th
and show cause why the trust should
not be terminated. The following are
the allegations made in the petition:
Your petitioner Rebecca Panee, form
erIy Rebecca Panee Huneku, respect
fully shows to your honor:
That on the 18th day of April 1883, j.
A Magoon, Esq, who had previously
to that date acted not as trustee, but
merely agent for your petitioner in
collecting rents and interest, and dis
bursting the same represented to your
petitioner that it would be greatly to her
interest to have himself made by the
court guardian of her estate and person,
and your petitioner. being then troubled
in her domestic relations, and not liy-
ing with her then husband, Huneku, and
having confidence in said Magoon con-
scented to have him appointed her guard
ian.
Your petitioner AYERS that she did not
understand from the petition of Magoon
made to this court in this proceeding on
the 18th day of April 1898, that she was
accused of drunkenness or Of anything
except q disposition to make extrava-
CANT expenditures, and that when your
petitioner signed and verified her con-
sent to the granting of said petition of
said Magoon, she did not then or ever
was charged therein with being drunk
ard And your petitioner ayers that she
was not then and has never been a
| drunkard, either within the meaning oil
Section 1868 of the Civil Laws of Hawaii
| Territory or at all.
Your petitioner AYERS that at the hear
ing of said application of April 18th, 1898
before Judge Whiting, no testimony
whatever was given except that of j. Al
| ~, th., l.
and files herein, to which reference is
hereby made. And your petitioner fur
Their AYERS that in answering at sale
| hearing the inquiry OF the Judge as Il
| whether the evidence then given by Ma
COON was correct, she replied in the af
firmative with the understanding and be
lief that the term 'spendthrift as uSet
by Mr.. Magoon. imputed TO her only
disposition on her part to live beyont
her income but that she did not agree
then or ever that she was spendthrif
in the legal sense, that is TO say, tina
she. was ''by excessive drinking, gaming
idleness. or debauchery of any kind" s.
spending wasting, or lessening her es
tate as TO expose herself or her famil.
to want or suffering.
Your petitioner further ayers that con
tinuing to have full confidence in SAT-
Magoon, she accepted his statement tina
the meagre allowance of S12 per wee
given her by him was all that could b
afforded and she has therefore accepte
such sum and greatly to her discomfor
has endeavored to live within the same
Your petitioner further AYERS that o
! the -----, 1896 at a time Vhe
petitioner. was an inmate of the choler
hospital tnd in danger of death, she, a
the earnest solicitation and invitation Q
said Magoon, signed and acknowledge
a will drawn by said Magoon, in whic
Magoon made himself heir or devisee @
her property.
Your petitioner further AYERS that sh
has no present knowledge of the statu
of her property, or her accounts wit
said Magoon, for the reason that sal
Magoon has filed no account with tn
Clerk of this Court since
. 1898; but your petitioner, on informatio
and belief. AYERS that said estate is O
the value of thirty thousand dollars, an
that the income from the same is o
could with prudent management be mad
to yield much as $500 per annum-
Your petitioner shows that said ]. A
Magoon made repeated efforts to sell t
your petitioner Gas a home for your Pc
1 he Of n