Warren sheaf. [volume] (Warren, Marshall County, Minn.) 1880-current, 1901-11-14
District Court.

L ~ o1NSS ~ lt'id LIE
Watts, of Crookston. Sheriff VIM,
Forsberg and his deputies, Clerk Of
Court T. lorck and Court Stenog-
rapher e. NJ. Loiin were OH hand TO
attend to their respective duties.
Nearly all members OF the Marshall
county bar were present, also sew
eral of the Crookston ATTORNEYS
The grand jury was set to work
promptly, and the WORK Of the calen-
dar taken up. Thus far the follow
ing are the most important cases
disposed of: ~s .-z.- 49,.
Kate Elliott vs.. Lewis Omer FL
lott. 81. steenerson for plaintiff.
Divorce case Tried at Crookston,
Nov. 8, 1901. Judgment for plain-
tiff. -.A ..
William Hendricks vs.. Abbea
Smith, Robert F. King, Collyers
Wentworth, Eli Dalquist and others.
S. & 0. Kipp for plaintiff and A.
Grindeland for defendants. Cuntin-
ued by stipulation.
Ray F. MILESTONE VS.. John J. Sub-
ton. Dismissed.
Fairbanks, Morse & Co. VS.. John
Russell and Edward j. Russell, CO.
partners as Russell Bros. J. F.
Hilscher for plaintiff. Greeley B.
Carr for defendant. Settled.
Benjamin Brownlee VS.. Isabella
Brownlee P. A. McClernon for
plaintiff. VIM. j. Brown for ds-
fendant. Divorce case. To be tried
by the court November %, at
Greenbush, Roseau county.
|. R. F. MILESTONE vs.. George EgIey
and II. Egley. Greeley E. Carr for
plaintiff. VIM. j.. Brown for do-
fendant. Action on premissorY
note for $115 and interest, amount
$165, given to Deering Harvester
Co. and assigned to Dr.. MILESTONE.
Judgment in favor OF plaintiff fJf ,
$275O.
E. Torgerson & Co. VS.. Russell
Bros Dismissed without costs to
either party by agreement
Greeley E. Carr VS.. Hans L. Mel
gaard. Greeley L. Carr and F. D.
Larrabee for plaintiff Theo. B.
Torkelson for defendant. Dismissed
at. the close of plaintiffs testimony;
did not esta blish a case.
Fleming Manufacturing Co. Ia
corporation) VS.. town of Fork.
Greeley E. Carr for plaintiff. h.
Steenerson and Chas. Loring for de-
fendant. Dismissed on motion of
plaintiff.
Edla C. StallbeFg VS.. VIM. Fors-
berg. Moyed on calendar by Wm~
j. Brown, attorney for. defendant.
Appeal from Justice court. Judgment
of lower court reversed.
The case of State VS.. James Nh
Cam was tried before jury yestes-
day. Defendant charged with point
ing a gun at another man. Jury r.
turned a verdict of guilty, but req
commended mercy, as defendant did
the act in attempting to drive de
trespassers from his land.
The grand jury thus far has
brought in two indictments. One
against John Rutka, who was charg-
ed with grand larceny in the second
degree for having stolen a wagon
from John Enden, in Bigwoods last
summer. He plead guilty and viii
be sentenced later. ...-
The other Indictment is agaiusb
Albert olson, or Halgrim Gunderson,
which he claims to be his right name.
He was charged with grand larceny
in the first degree for robbing Aug
Wahlmark of a sum of money in \
hotel at Argyle. Was permitted I'd
plead guilty to grand larceny in the
second degree, and will be sentenced
later.
A case from Roseau county, Rob
ert Wood vs. George R. Roberts. is be-
ing tried today, with A. Grindeland,
attorney for plaintiff and B. B. Brett
| for deft. The parties to the suit and
| other witnesses, from Warroad, are
lin attendance. 1t is a suit to recov-
er on contract.
-Four new improved street lamps,
/ u l.. e