Evening journal., 1901-02-05
MANY CANEN
TO BE TRIED
Superior Court Went Over
Trial List To-day Grand
Jury IndictS

In Superior Court this morning the
trial list was gone over and the follow
ing cases marked for trial: Thomas
vs.. Pennsylvania Railroad Company;
Gear vs.. T., w. & b. Railroad Com
pany, special jury, Neumann vs. D.a-
mond State lrOn Company special
jury; Ewing vs.. Mayor and Council.
special jury; Harper y Co. vs.. TAD
man & Hickman special jury; Warren
vs.. Mccullough Iron Company. special
jury; Pfromm VS.. p, w. & b. Railroad
Company, special jury; Grimes VS.. p,
W. a. b. Railroad Company, spsclaI
jury; Dennis Dougherty VS.. Mayor and
! iCouncll: WColery vs.. Lynch a. Hughes;
Dunn VS.. Commercial Fire Insurance
Company; Rathbone VS.. Clerk; Ca
hills administrator VS.. Jessup and
Moore Paper Company. special jury;
May VS.. Roe; Big Bed Slate Quarry
Company VS.. Mitchell; Forwood VS..
Brown; Greenwood VS.. Wilmington
City Railway Company; COnroy VS..
Mayer and Council; MacFarlane VS..
Barr; Tulley VS. F.. w. q b. Railroad
Company, special jury; Lank VS.. Mayor
and Council, special jury; Peters VS..
/ Commercial Fire Insurance Company;
Lacey VS.. B. & P. Railroad Company;
Mayne VS.. Mayor and Council; Chand-
Ter VS.. Mayor and Council; Smith VS..
Forbes; Paires VS.. Bayne; Atherly vs..
Gam; Pritchard VS.. Henderson, Miller
VS.. Republican Printing and Publishing
Company; Fraim VS.. Fahey, special
jury; Strawbridge < Clothier VS..
Pyle; Love VS.. Barnesyille Manufacture
ing Company; Satterthwaite VS.. Chris
tiana River Improvement Company;
Leigh VS.. Pusey and Jones Company;
Miller vs.. Dickey; Callahan VS.. same
! Dunn vs.. same: Holland VS.. Dickey;
Hirons VS.. Wilmington City Railway
company. special jury: Mitchell VS.
/ Yerger; Fell IS. Valentine; Wells-ller-
i ring & Co VS.. GuessfOrd; Connolly vs.
Jones; same VS.. Cardwell; Roberts VS.
Dunlap; Giordano VS.. Brandywine
Granite Company. special jury.
The cases of Baxter VS.. White, West
VS.. ROthwell were continued for settle
ment Judgment non pros was entered
in the suit of Campbell VS. p, w. & b.
Railroad Company.
In the case of Bessie NJ. Hickman
vs.. Harvey p. Hickman, leave was
granted to withdraw an exhibit in q
lpreyiOus case.
A rule for security for costs was
granted in the case Of Ringwalt VS.
Allen. In the foreign attachment case
lOf J. Norris NobinsOn VS.. Maria j. Rob
insOn. leave to amend the return was
granted. A rule for writ Of possession
was granted, returnable later, in the
case of Martin e. Watson. executor OF
J. A. II. Watson VS.. ID. T. Bradford.
In the case of the Hydrogen
Company VS.. the Board of Directors OF
the Street and Sewer Department, in
terested attorneys obtained the alter
native writ desired. which the court
made returnable February %.
GENERAL SESSIONS COURT.
1t was IL o'clock when General Ses.
sions Court began its work. The grand
jury retired after a brief charge by
Justice Lore. and at 1926 o'clock re
turned the following indictments: JOIN
II. Murray Lavinia Stoeckle, james
Walton and Sadie Chambers, larceny
Bills against Edward Mulvey and Pat
rick Brady were ignored Louisi
Stoeckle. cOlored, against whom ther,
are two indictments. entered pleas o
guilty; Sadie Chambers, guilty; james
Walton. guilty. The other prisoners
will be arraigned this afternoon.
Henry c. Conrad presented a peti
tion from the Street and Sewer De
partment for a commission to vacat,
the bed of Eleventh street where i
crosses the tracks of the Baltimorl
r and Philadelphia Railroad Co., VIII
liam S. Hilles and John Biggs repre-
sent property owners opposed to tn,
a vacating of the street. The attorney
r wise endeavor to agree on commission
r ers who will pass upon the matter o
closing the street.