The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1901-11-08

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State Of Washington, for King County
Machias Lumber Company, a corpora
Ion, composed Of J. J.. Miller and
Andrew Streicher, Defendant. No.
33,813 Summons by Publication
The State Of Washington, to the said
Andrew Streicher, defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication Of this summons to-wit:
within sixty days after the Sth day Of
November, 1901, and defend the above
entitled action in the above entitled
court, and answer the complaint Of the
plaintiffs and serve a copy of your
answer upon the undersigned attorneys
for plaintiffs, at their Office elbow
stated; and in case of your failure so to
do, Judgment will be rendered against
you according to the demand Of the com
plant, which has been filed with the
clerk Of said court. The object of the
said action is to recover the sum Of one
hundred eighteen dollars and fifty-seven
cents ($1l85D for lumber sold and deIiv-
cred to the defendant at the defendants
request, and for writ of attachment to
issue against the property Of the defend
ant BRADY & GAY,
Plaintiffs Attorneys.
POStOftce Address: Rooms 10 to IA RoX-
well Bldg, Seattle, King County, Wash
ington.
IN THE SUPERIOR q CRT OF THE
State Of Washington foc the County Of
King Teckla Q. Hughes, plaintiff, VS..
Thomas Hughes, defendant. No. 32S9S.
Summons by publication.
The State Of Washington to Thomas
Hughes:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date Of the
nrst publication of this summons, to-wit:
within sixty days after the 9Th day Of
September, A. ID. 1901 and defend the
above entitled action nj the above entitled
court, and answer the complaint of the
plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer
upon the undersigned attorney for plain
tiff at his office below stated; and in case
Of your failure so to do, judgment will
pc rendered against you according to the
demand Of the complaint, which has been
nled with the clerk of said court. The OBJ
ject of this action, set forth in the com
plant, is as follows: That the above ac-
uon IS instituted by the plaintiff to secure
a divorce from the defendant on the
ground Of desertion and non-support
w. I'll. BUTTNER, Attorney for Plaintiff.
+. Y. address, 5l3 Third avenue, Seattle
Washington.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State Of Washington, for King County
Joseph ConigHo, plaintiff vs. Josephine
ConigHo, defendant. No. Sum-
State Of Washington to said Josephine
COmiglio:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty (6W days after the date Of
me tlrSt publication of this summons to
WIT: sixty 600 days after the 25th day Of
october, 1901, and defend the above en-
utled action in the above entitled court:
ana answer the complaint OF the plain
III, and serve a copy of your answer
upon the undersigned attorneys for plain
,ut at their office below stated; and in
Ease OF your failure so to do, judgment
Will be rendered against you according to
tne demand Of the complaint, which has
oeen filed with the clerk of said court
Inc object for which said action is
| oLougnt Is 70 secure divorce upon the
grounds of abandonment
ROOT, PALMER & BROWN.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
| PoStoffIce Address: 533 Pioneer Build
ing, Seattle Washington.
First publication. October Is.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
S,a OF washington, in and for the
county Of King. John Dwight Tired
way, plaintiff, VS.. Guillilomine Eva
TredWay, defendant. Department No
Z; No, 1865. Summons for Service by
Inc State Of Washington to the said
| GulIllomlne Eva Tredway defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
Wlthln sixty 500 days after the
nLat Puoncatlon Of this summons, to-
! VII: within sixty 600 days after the 25th
Jay OF October, 1901, and defend the
above entitled action in the above en-
tltled court; and answer the complaint Of
ne plalhtltf, and serve a copy Of your
answer upon the undersigned attorneys
TOT PLAINTIFF, at their office below stated
ana III case Of your failure so to do
Judgment will be rendered against you,
according to the demand of the complaint
| winch mas been filed with the clerk of
said court
The object Of the above entitled action
Is 70 obtain a decree of divorce, dssolv--
ing the bonds of matrimony, now existing
between plaintiff and defendant IN the
ground Of abandonment
Dated, Seattle, Washington, October
z3rd4 1901.
HTrNTpIJpTEc Q 1,ce,,,rr
Attorneys for Plaintiff Office and p b.
Address: 601-6O2 The Mutual Life.
Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King
county, Washington.
Date Of first publication, October %
81
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
state OF Washington, for the County Of
hlng. Mary Mcdonald plaintiff vs.
Daniel Mcdonald, defendant No -
summons by Publication.
Ihe State OF Washington fl tho said
PANEL Mcdonald, defendant;
lou are hereby summoned to aDpear
WIlhln sixty days after the date Of the
Llrst publication Of this summons, to-Wit:
"IlLnn sixty days after the 18th dav If
ocloper, l9Ol,, and defend the above en-
rlIled action in the above emitted court
ana answer the complaint Of the plaintiff
ana serve copy of your answer upon
ne ne aruerslshed attorney for plaintiff at
| rs office below stated: and in case Of
| your failure 50 to do judgment will he
LeAuefed against you according ia the
| demahd OF the complaint, which has been
| LlIed with the clerk Of said court
Inc OBJECT OF the ABOVE entitled action
s 70 OBTAIN a decree Of divorce by plain
III from defendant on the ground that
uelehdant neglected and refused to make
| suitable provisions for his family.
J. z. BALL,
| Attorney for Plaintiff
| +. Q. Address: Suite il Roxwell Block
otdttle, county Of King, Washington.
nj IrGt nIIb1
| N THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
/ ptate OF Washington for the County of
AlhS. In probate In the matter Of the
estate OF Elizabeth S. Gilbert deceased
no 5S3z. Order to Show Cause
Inc above entitled matter coming on to
D ,,91 heard card upon this 24th day Of October,
L9ol, upon the petition of Sarah A. Ken
dall, Administrative herein, for the sale
| II the following described CIaIlam comfy
warrants. to-Wit:
.,d Dale ,o No. Amount.
, III uafy ., 1896 ......495 $500
october -, 1896 .......2S3 ) "a
November L., 1896 ..... 2gg M
JanEa ~, % 59'' 7o 80. ..-.....464 1000
e'ii'to'Iy q, 1898 ...... ...........y34 500 on
Total ...... ego u
At private sale, and it duly apnearine !"
re court, that 1t is necessary to sell some
u the personal estate Of said deceased IN
order to pay tine expenses of the Iaet III
ness OF said deceased and the funeral ~
penses o1 SAID deceased, and to paw the
expenses OF administration and If fnrthar
uuly appearing to the court that there is
iol SuIIlclent funds in the hands Of said
0uLnlhlstratr1X to pay said expenses. and
Itat SAID administrative has received an
o1Ief from one r. z. Barstow Of s5Go
"nIcn IS $o936 more than the apnrafsad
na5ue thereof; and it further duly an
Pa ING 70 the court that it will be far
ne pest interest to said estate II saII
9ald warrants at private sale and thar
more can be realized than BY a public
sale therefor puolic
now therefore: 1t is by the court. he
~ uuIy ADVISED in the premises. order
"a, that all persons interested in Said
estate pc and appear before this court an
Ilday, the Sth DAY of November. Al +he
nour OF $3.50 o'clock in the morning IF
2eIu udy, IN department No. Of said
curt; and then and there to show cans,
= any they have why said petition should
~ oe granted and said warrants sold at
rIIEdle sale, ana that copy OF this order
~ y p ~ lL5 IN some newspaper publish
~ N KING county once a week 1or twn
weeks, and that three copies hereof ho
posted as required by law.
Done III open court this 24th dav of
october. 1901 10y u