Washington sentinel., 1901-02-09
Actual RRsct of the Measure Now
Pending In Congress-

| Actual RRect of the Measure Now
Pending In Congress.
The report Of the minority OF the
committee on merchant marine and
fisheries thus exposes the actual ef-
feets Of the ship subsidy bill which
Senator Hanna and his friends IN the
Internatio Navigation company are
making such strenuous efforts to get
through the present congress:
A careful examination Of the terms
OF the bill and Of the conditions Of
shipbuilding and shipOwnlng, as stated
by the commissioner Of navigation,
has convinced us that the real effect
Of this bill viii not be to encourage
the building Of ships which would
not otherwise be built or to in
crease trade, but to further increase
the profits OF the already prosper
Gus lines which without subsidy have
been built or contracted for the very
ships to subsidize which this bill is
framed.
Mr., Griscom i'm House Hearings,
pages "a and %, explained as to ships
which would be specially favored:
II should say offhand that the IA
knot ship Of the largest possible size,
that would carry about 10000 tons,
would be the ship that under that
Subsidy bill would get the best COM
pensatlon-that IS, II knots IS about
the speed that we think is economical
speed to do the business, especially on
the Pacific and also on the Atlantic.
We have ships building Of between
1900 and 1900 Oons) and Of moder-
ate speed. 4 great many are building
in Great Britain now which will carry
10000 tons Of cargo and not measure
10000 registered TONNAGE.
"Of such ships there are compare.
lively few In the world today. 1t is
only recently that they have been
built at all In 1898 the greatest year
for shipbuilding Of which we have
read in the worlds history, but six
IN all We're turned out-four in Great
Britain and two in Germany. But on
Sept 30, 1899, there were then building
Of such vessels 16 in Great Britain and
several in Germany, largely for subsidy
promised by this bill"
AS most OF these ships were being
constructed under contracts made In
1897 and 1898 and for the lines repre-
sented on the committee which drew
the original subsidy bill and sent it to
congress in 1898, it only remains to be
stated that, as Senator Frye has eX-
planned SENATE hearings, p. p, it was
In 1897 that the coterie behind this bill
was formed. Having originally plan
ned 10 let IN only foreign ships con-
tracted for abroad Jan. 1, 1899 they
Immediately proceeded to place their
contracts.
The date was not changed to Jan. 1,
1900, until II was too late for those out
side OF this Coterie to secure contracts
on that date.
We see no reason why only a favored
few should be permitted to bring in
foreign ships and get subsidy upon
them and believe that the date should
be set ahead, so that all viii have an
equal opportunity 60 take advantage Of
our country's generosity.
The "cargO" amendment, while II will
probably not hurt anybody, will GER
talnly never touch the owners OF pas
senger steamers. Under 1t steamships
like the st. Paul would not need to car
ry more than 800 or 1000 tons OF car
go to get the full subsidy, while they
never leave our ports with much less
than a full cargo-3, 800 to $500 tons.
Should II ever happen that they would
wish to leave our ports with less than
1900 tons the owners have but to sell
more space by the year, and the sub
sidy stream will continue to 1ow full
as before.
Such large amount OF subsidy prac-
tically put at the disposal Of the few
who benefit by this bill cannot but tend
to unite even more closely than now
the great shipbuilding, shlpowning and
railroad interests concerned ia this
measure.
BY the time these few interests bring
in their foreign owned ships and get
their ships now being built into the
subsidy race the S9OOO,OOO limit viii
undoubtedly be reached; hence It viii
be to their interest to combine to stop
competition and 10 prevent their sub.
sldy rates aud profits from declining
We believe that such a combination
would be completed soon after the pas
sage OF this bill.