The daily morning journal and courier., 1901-10-25
IN AND ABOUT THE COURTS
LfSTO OF CASES ron THE SUPREM F
 COURT CHEN OUT YESTERD4Y.
Many Important Matters from New Haven County-George Williams Re- leated from JaiI-nIatters in Common Pleas and City Courts.

Pleas and City Courts.
 The October term of the supreme court of errors for this, the Third ju- dicial district, will come in at Bridge port on Tuesday next, October 29. The docket of New Haven cases is a long one. It is included in the following:
 Old cases The New Haven Trust Company, receiver vs. Daniel F. Fitz- patrick; defendants appeal. This is one of the Connecticut indemnity cases, in which the plaintiff sought to recover on note of eight hundred dol lars, part of the companys assets Judgment for plaintiff was found in the lower court
 Frank Clark vs. the Manufacturers | National Bank; writ of error
 New cases; William Brennan vs. the Berlin Iron Bridge Company. Defend ants appeal Still another appear ance os this famous suit for damages from Naugatuck in this court Bren- nan was hurt by pile of lumber in bridge building there in 1895, At the last trial a previous judgment of three thousand dollars damages was re~af- firmed. The costs were thrown on the defendant.
 Patrick Kelly, administrator, vs. the New Haven Steamboat Company. De- fendant's appeal The superior court rendered judgment of four thousand dollars against the defendant for the killing of John E. Kelly by the snap ping of a hawser on the steamboat Continental
 The New Haven Trust Company, re- ceiver vs John B. Doherty ct al. de- fendant's appeal, The Schmidt Con- necticut indemnity case In which judg- ment was for $l9S69,S3
 The New Haven Trust Company, re- celver. vs. John B. Doherty, ct al, plaintiffs appeal, (No cases.) Indem nifty matters. Appeals from judgment for defendant in the matter of the ten thousand dollar loan to F. A. Dutton; and for another in the mortuary settle ments case. It had been claimed that the money represented in these mortu- ary balances was wholly lost to the company
 Solomon Mead vs, John Fitzpatrick, adm, ct als., plaintiffs appeal An ef- fort to quiet title in some property on Derby avenue. Judge c. w. hWeeler found the plaintiff never had actual possession of the premises In question
 State of Connecticut vs Ann Maria Rathbun, defendants appeal The New Haven poisoning case.
 Ethel Bartholomew vs. Charles I. Parmelee, defendants appeal The Boo" case Damages of seven hun dred dollars were awarded the plain tiff in the superior court.
 Alexander F.. Hamilton vs Jeremiah Smith X Sons, plaintiff's S appeal
 William R. Shelton vs John F. Hea- ly, defendants appeal. The lower court gave Shelton s4315 damages in suit. the allegation being that Healy fraudulently persuaded Shelton to pur- chase stock in the now defunet Char ter Oak Brick company
 The Quinnipiac Brewing Company ct als. vs. Charles Hackbarth, ct al, de- fendants' appeal
 Edward P. Avery, James P Landers, John H. Clark and John r. Shannon vs John P Studley, Mayor appellants appeal. These are well known Big Four" appeals from the superior court for reinstatement as police commits sioners. After their removal by Mayor Studley they took the case to the su- perior court, which sustained the may | or.
 Daniel Dore vs Frederick w. Bab- l cock, defendants appeal. This was q | jury verdict of nine thousand dollars | against the plaintiff, who conducts an | oil delivery business, Some of the oil 1 exploded, burning Dore's store on | Grand avenue.
 Henry Makepeace, ct uX., vs. the City of Waterbury Plaintiffs appeal
 The J. & J. Eager Company vs. Cath crime F. Burke adx., defendants ap- peal.
 Samuel Dolph vs. the New York, New Haven 6 Hartford Raildoad Company, plaintiffs appeal. Plaintiff is of Gui- ford and sued for ten thousand dollars for vehicular accident resulting from one of the defendants trains
 George Fl Cowles vs. Charles Miller. appeal This is another step in the half-million dollars Brass City law suit. Judge Thayer in the superior court ordered the defendant, wealthy aWaterbury desident, to Td0S1er to NIT. OlOWeS SlJ SHaTeS or the | Cloves company stock on re- ,eipt of $72S00. The defendant then appealed This is famous case in The judgment was not as lmple as had been expected. George M. Curtis, receiver, vs Hen y J. Lewis, ct all, reservation. This Is he Meriden matter of the acceptance if the committees report in the case of he receivership case of the Chapman 1 Manufacturing company, a horse goods oncern. The question concerns the egality of fourteen thousand dollar mortgage which it is said to be claimed ( vas not recorded until short time be- ore the failure, although 1t has been n existence for years, as reported. There are twenty New Haven county ases on the docket.
 WILL SELL CANAL BOAT | The financial storms which have bat ( cred the steam canal boat City of Uti- a for the past four months will be ' lulled at o'clock this af- arnoon when the craft will be sold at r