Waterbury Democrat., 1901-02-22
SHORT CALENDER MATTERS.
Trial List Gone Over and Several
 Cases Assigned.

Cases Assigned.
 Short calendar was held in the su- periOr court room this forenoon. Judge Thayer presided. The trial list was gone over and all the cases therein
 were claimed for hearing at this ses-
 sion of the court. There are only six jury cases, two privileged court cases | and twenty-six ordinary cases. The privileged ones are the city of Water
 bury vs the Connecticut Lighting and Railway company, and George H.
 Gloves vs Randolph-C Cloves company. In the first the plaintiff seeks damages on the grounds that the oefendant ran it's trolley tracks, wires, etc, across a sidewalk on West Main street and also asks that permanent injunction be issued restraining the defendant from runnin% its cars across said sidewalk. The other case is a motion to dissolve temporary injunction, issued by Judge Coweu, and later modified by Judge Ralph Wheeler of the superior court. This injunction restrained the plaintiff from entering suit against the defendant within this state or the state of New Jersey. The following motions
 were granted: Alice Hosely vs Hud- son Hosley, motion to transfer from the New Haven docket to the local docket: Dime Savings bank vs Paul F. McAleney, motion to file substituted complaint; Farmers Loan and Trust company, appeal from probate motion to transfer from New Haven to local docket; Lena A. Gardner vs Edward B. Gardner motion to amend by add ing additional count; this is a divorce case: Dime Savings bank yS William H. Wright. motion for disclosure, judg- ont ln " Ia rI Tuesday in July; George Fl. Boughton. trustee, vS Susan B. Pryor, and the same vs Henry l. Bougnron, motions to eypunCe were argued at great length. The cases are to recover for money lent and for rent and the ale
 gations relating to the first were or dered eXpun@ed: Edward McGratil vs William McGrath, complaint was amended; Waterbury Lumber and Coal company vs Patrick Cougan. motion for judgment in compliance with the order of the supreme court was al- lowed. This means that the defend- ant shall pay S1U.GO instead of $500, as ordered by the superior court. and from which decision he appealed. The case was d mechanics lien. The next matter was a series of motions made by Attorney M. J. Byrne, receiver, to settle up the affairs of the Globe Pub fishing company. The first, for instruc- tionS concerning unpaid stock, Attor- ney Clohessey representing his father, Assessor John Clohessey. MT Ryrne stated that twenty shares said to be owned, but unpaid for. by MT Clo- heSSey, were inventoried in the estate of the company but all he could find paid for were two shares. The twen- ey would cost $500. The records of . I,A ,>1,n fr, of.4i whatsoever with MT Clohessey. At torney Clohessey stated that his father did pay $50 for two shares, but was not aware that he had bought $500 worth. The court thought this very strange. There was evidently something wrong and an investigation ought to be made. The papers in the case did not show what they pretended. MT Byrne claimed he did not charge anything, yet the papers showed he charged $500. He explained that he did not charge for collecting for the company. The court did not think it beneficial to the estate to enter suit for $4. He took the papers, remarking he would examine them and advised the receiver to hasten a settlement. The present situation shows that the property was approved at S29OO. On hand there is
 $S99. .73: machinery and type brought l $500 and q number of bills remain un- | collected. ..-r '.-, Cases for trial by Jury next week were assigned as follows: Tuesday, | town of Waterbury vs the Waterbury | Traction company; Peter Burns's ap
 peal from probate; Josephine \. Mah
 CT, eXecutriN. appeal from commission
 CTS appointed by the court of probate 1 in Naugatuck, and Margaret Walsh against the same. It is believed by
 counsel in the first named case that
 it will occupy the whole week. This | is sequel to the case of Anthony Ash | borne vS the town of Waterbury, and
 is an effort of the town to collect the
 damages it paid to Ashborne, about
 $5,JO0. '--,-
 Of the number of divorce cases on i the docket five are claimed for trial. They are Robert H. Welton vS Emma
 c. Welton, Josephine St IIiliare vs Eu- | gene St Hiliare, COrdelia Trudeau vS
 Cleophas Trudeau, Harriet G. Clad
 ding vs Timothy Gladding.