The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1901-06-20

pauper having a settlement in Indiana to
be Imprisoned in "a jail in this state.
1882. Swain VS.. WinGle. Huntington c.
C. Petition for rehearing overruled.
1857. Makeiver VS.. Nartindale. Jasper
c. c. Petition for rehearing %oyerruled.
Dismissed under Rule p.
1863. Fisher VS.. State. Marion C. c..
Same.
Minutes
1900. William S. Ralya. administrator,
etc. VS.. +. c. Atkins * Co. Marion s. c
Appellants reply brief.
APPELLATE COURT.
1855. Nappanee (etc.) Company VS.. Reid
(etc.) Company. Elkhart c. c. Affirmed.
Robinson, il. The directors of an in
solvent corporation cannot convey all of its
property to secure the payment OF antece-
dent debts evidenced by notes executed
by the directors individually and personally,
and also to secure a debt due to one of
their number, TO the exclusion OF its other
creditors. 2. The directors of an insolvent
corporation cannot prefer themselves 10 the
exclusion of it's other crediators nor pre-
fer a debt upon which a majority or all OF
the directors are indorsers.
1886. Scofeld VS.. Myers. Marion S. G.
Affirmed. Roby. il. A traveller in a pub
lie highway has a right to assume that
approaching teams are in the hands OF
competent drivers, and that horses will not
be improperly driven along the street. He
is not negligent in failing to look for
danger if under the circumstances he has
no reason TO dDDTenenu IL. 4 "A Traveller III
a vehicle along a highway is not bound TO
look behind him for approaching danger
when he has no reason to apprehend It,
3697. Peoples (etc.) Association VS.. Mark
ley. Wells G. c. Affirmed. Black. c. j.
/. The Legislature may prescribe the terms
and conditions under which a corporation
organized under the laws of another State
may do business in this State. 2. To en-
title a foreign building association to en-
force its contracts with borrowers ii must
appear that the proper authority for the
a. - Tho sine urna IL
with the clerk of the county in which the
business was done, as per Sections 1853 ct
sea-, Burns. 1894.
1921. Grand RAPIDS (etc.) Railroad Com
pany VS.. Petit. Allen G.. c. Reversed.
Henley. J.-Section 52O6, Horner, 1897. the
employers liability act, makes a railroad
company liable for an injury suffered by
an employe only when the latter was act
ing under the special order or direction
of one to whose orders and directions at the
time of the injury he was bound to conform
and was conforming. And a railroad brake
man, in performing the ordinary duties OF
his position, cannot be held TO be, within
the meaning of the statute, acting under
the special order or direction of the con-
ductOr.
342s. c., L. & L. Railway Company VS..
Ferguson. Lawrence c. C Petition for
rehearing overruled.
1916. Mankin VS.. Pennsylvania Company.
Porter G. c. Petition for additional time
granted. Certiorari granted and issued.
3949. Spiker VS.. Cole. Miami c. c. Dis
1868. c. & E. Railroad Company VS.. New
man. Pulaski c. C. Petition for rehearing
overruled.
1882. c.. c.. c. & St. L. Railway Com
pany VS.. Kinsley. Tippecanoe s.. c. Petit
ton for rehearing overruled.
Minutes
1910. Isaac Russell VS.. Margaret Bruce
ct al. Marion c. c. Appellants brief on
motion of McNhirter to dismiss "a
1906. City of Indianapolis VS.. Margaret
E. Crane. Marion S. c.. Appellee's petition
for additional time granted. Appellee's
s6OS. The Greenwood B. and L. Associa-
ton VS.. Bertha Todd Stanton. Johnson c.
c. Appellants reply brief (S.)
4OO5. Frank l.. Monteith VS.. Kokomo
Wood Enameling Company. Howard s. c.
Appellants petition to advance and notice.
SUPERIOR COURT.
Room John L. McMaster. Judge.
Joseph c.. Bogard VS.. Jacob n. Farr; dis
solution and receiver. On trial by court.
Room Flames NJ. feathers, Judge.
Walter f. Mayo ct al. VS.. Indiana Lead
Glass Company: receiver. On trial by
Room 3-vinson Carter. Judge.
James NJ. Robinson VS.. c. M. Carpenter:
note. Finding and judgment against de-
PENDANT for sl73.S5 and costs.
Emeline A. Weber VS.. William S. Bitt-
rich; note. Finding and Judgment against
defendant for $426.30 and costs.
The following cases were dismissed on
calls: Mast Co. VS.. Rowland & j. ct al;
Pearson VS.. c. c., C.. & st; L. Ry. Co;
Alemo Cement Co. We. Walding CT al; Kan
die VS.. Handle; Holton VS.. McNaul; futile
ct al. VS.. Shower; Hoy VS.. Town OF Irving
Marshall VS.. Trow ct al; Eden VS.. Green ct
al; Smith VS.. Morse & Son; Woman ct al.
VS.. c., c., c. & st. L.. Ry. Co.; Cap. n.
Barnes VS.. waters ct al; Derbyshire Stone
Co. VS.. Derbyshire; Hays VS.. Willetts;
| Howard VS.. Citizens st. Ry. Co.; Blooming
- -- u % We plta0razG Gro 90
Rose VS.. Furnas; Dawson VS.. Mahoney;
| Bradford VS.. Sanders; State of Indiana VS..
| Hay; Wilson. exr-, VS.. Old Wayne ms Co;
| Johnson VS.. Meanley; Mann VS.. Palmer et
| al: Cluns VS.. Martin: James VS.. Greenleaf
ct al; Peters VS.. Peters ct al; Hunter VS..
| Butterheld ct al; Western p. and G.. Co.
VS.. Newman ct al; Jordan VS.. Greenloaf
eft al; Royse VS.. McAdams ct al; Jones
VS.. Ind. Life Ins. Co.; Gavin VS.. l., d. *
s. Ry Co.; Mcclure VS.: Graham ct al;
| Dunbar VS.. Dunbar; Iglick VS.. Iglick ct al;
| Dunn VS.. Beck ct al; Babcock VS.. N. Y.
Imp. Co; Howard VS.. n. Y. Imp. Co; Hall
VS.. Hall; Roth VS.. Daggett ct al; Murphy
McClain: Miller VS.. Indianapolis ST. Ry.
Co: Raschig VS.. Barr ct al; Haas US.
| Aufderheide ct al; Coins VS.. Coins; Stuck
| enberg VS.. Wire-bound Box Co. ct al; Bull
lock VS.. Kresteter; Dunkle VS.. Green ct al:
Presley VS.. Kaminskey; O'Hara VS.. Roth
ct al; Hart Va. Lantz; Pritchard VS. Tuck
Ciune; Shoemaker VS.. Gottman ct al: Ru-
bush VS.. White River Sand Co; Thomas
VS.. Thomas ct al; Herrod VS.. Black ct al.
Kitchell VS.. Kitchell Ell al: Hepler VS.. Ray;
Beidelman vs.. Harris ct al: Emminck VS..
Lahman; Thompson VS.. Sommers ct al;
Britton VS.. Britton; Trader VS.. Trader;
Lilly. tr.. VS.. Carpenter et al: Conarroe
vs.. McCarty; Navin VS.. Navin; Krauss VS..
Holland: Herrod VS.. Gauss et al; Ander-
son VS.. Gil; Williamson VS.. Kennick: State
ex rel. VS.. Scharfer ct al. Matt vs.. Baus;
Collier VS.. Yeager; Sauer VS.. Harper.
CIRCUIT COURT.
Henry Clay Allen. Judge.
Charles O. Brinkman VS.. Claudia L.