The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1901-05-29
FF CASE
GEAR
Says
| Will Not
|Try It.
IN
|RT YESTERDAY
b That He Gave Lewis
Erad Of the Courts
Decision.

IA s1se -
\ water C. Smith fell yes
lsr.ing at 10 o'clock The
sor vas we'll filed with |
Enacted to hear something
L. lswvars who are deeply |
H. pending case. Mr..
| aompanled by his attor-
Bsllou, Kinney, Andrews
ludge Hartwell refusing |
] bsfore Judge Humphreys |
s MS rights were again i'm
eehg the lawyers present
guuled a prominent seat.
/ ball Bailiff Lewis rub
.no9here of gloom. Turk |
The proceedings began |
rg Of Mr.. Fitch. address |
ia court, by the way, |
iii il had been sitting up |
70 figure out what had
gsy II pIease YOUR Honor.
-Fisge Of saying a few
!. we're it before a legisla-
should call a question
I'd think II may be prop
zd In court.
!. Advertiser Of yesterday
" nOt been able to be here
~ G.ng the attention of
ss-sa Affidavit made by Ar
Pc, IN which among other
ss ihat said Oscar Lewis
y! to the baiiiff of this
'Eisd by Turk, his former
lz ne a, my Office. Lewis
q ae had some informa-
Z oa the dead quiet. and
: Fitch had told him that
-nsaniag Secretary Cooper
Satsltsli Of Public Works
stnt zse was then pend
!nds. Hunphreys upon the
n;e1E-Eould be discharged
fE SsTt Tuesday on the
hsafay evidence, but that
'aaid burn them up in his
nv q course, what Mr..
aFs said to NJ. Smith or
Sa nay have interpreted
<ss said 70 him. but I do
ztaz-
H. Smith do you mean2
laaTit say Mr.. Smith?
II Pearson Of the Adver-
aEsd Mr. Smith up in my
Z Advertiser.
aai neither to Mr.. Lewis,
court. nor to any other
une or place anywhere
Easa to state what the de-
1oert would be upon any
.''ia be impossible that 1
hing. OF course, I
alnk likely I may have
siogether possible that
n TACT l remember that
- % ne while I was seat
/ don't know how long
Nqsnt, whether it was the
ne next day, and asked
'e would go, and 1 made
nat / did not see now
saa decide any other way;
,a made without thought,
S4' any attempt would be
le'chandise of It; that I
s'E Your Honor could de-
"a way than TO discharge
i. ground Of the testimony
n fact, I had said that
IN fact, I believe l
NAT in the argument
'pon by the Court to act
n the case, and I have
nat the duties of that
son the person who FIJI
'lhg else than to advise
y reference 70 what he
y De the views of the
sovise the Court as to
10 be the law in the
and I have said since
<a'a - in saying now. thai
your Honor could de-
!. any other way than tc
!. 'le on the ground thai
esuiied that the evi.
a. lheir knowledge wa:
szA'ored to discharge the
-. Sa'ae with fairness anC
!. ~ Malice, for ! posses,
s, ,.ae ..'lt now IN the case. no,
e,.,. 0ola l have said that i
b, Of your Honor to bur,
eso,st.-se -seI the two state
a.ns.s'ent If the Cour
+ r,.,r "a the ground that n,
L. rs,aIed, I could not pre
n. Ioart s..' would take it upo, no
ss,,s,y.. aay remarks that wer
e ny. PIRATE to the occasion.
4 d 3o, seem =, Of small conse
rs no no' Ike to be place,
l. stat statement or inadver Hss
= .ss,' ,'alnanIty M or before tn
"a q expressing opinion ~,
ssz !, ] The light Of Stain Stain
q - any knowledge Wha 4n
!. he ,as Court wouis be shs
stoss sog1 "a, Honor knows h.
Ills sr Ia you directly or T r
. ']ect, or said ~