Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1901-11-07

person by the name OF ]. y. King who
wrote for Gle paper.
~ you know II ne gave any one per-
MISSION TO write In his manner"
y do not
| w. 5. Newberry, manager of the
western Newspaper Union testified
mat ne was acquainted with
,he defendant, knew him in
nprh, put did not know his business,
~ said IN answer to counsel for state
una' ne mad no business dealings with
uc 1etendant In the month OF April,
put mat Living Issues was published by
lis urn. Asked II he knew Kings con-
nectlons with paper, witness said he did
not Asked what person he had deal
,nss VITA witness could not remember,
office.
When did King come n?"
don't remember"
Did you ever have any Dealings with
King?"
lie came In the Office once or twice"
Mr Newberry then described how the
paper was published, and said his firm
fnailed copies of the paper
On cross-examlnation he said he
knew Mr.. King and remembered that In
Maroh King said TO him that he was
no longer associated with the paper
ana that he must not look TO him for
anything connected with It.
Did he not tell you that he had sew
cred all connection with the, paper?'
YES"
rs II not fact that when King was
connected with the paper you got your
money, and that when he left you did
not get your money, that you got stuck
for part OF III"
This was objected to by Mr.. Loot
borrow. and Judge Hles argued that
the question was proper The objection
was overrUled, and witness replied. 1T
IL not all true | remember that part
OF one bill was not paid
Now. did you have another CONVEX
sation with King after thisY'
II remember another conversation,
but not the substance Of IT,"
Witness said that King told him to
change the head Of the paper, and In
answer TO Mr. Rogers said he supposed
the name had been changed.
Nov about this second CONVERSE
tlon:' when King brought that copy to
you, didn't he say he brought II for
Sloan, who was sick?"
Yes"
Nightingale was then recalled and
asked what change was made In the
management Of the paper Objected 10,
and witness was asked II he knew that
a change had been made. He said he
didn't know when the change was
made. He said he didn't know when
made. Asked II there was ever a time
when he was not under the direction OF
King he said only when King was
away.
Soren Y. Christensen was next callea.
"Do you know Of corporation OF the
Living Issues Company was the hrst
question. This was objected TO ana
Mr.. Loofbourow explained ~ the
question was for the purpose OF show
ing that the corporation had nothing to
do with the publication OF the particu-
lar issue OF the paper. The objection
was sustained and Mr.. Christensen was
excused.
Miss Lou Morris was then asked to
take the stand. She said she knew Mr..
King.
Did you ever have conversation
with him concerning his business"
This question was objected to on the
ground that the state had failed so far
To establish the corpus dellcti. OBJ
lection sustained and witness excused.
State Auditor c. s. Tingey was the
next witness and produced number 81
vouchers OF Judge johnson for mileage.
He said they included all the vouchers
OF Judge Johnson.
Answering Mr.. Rogers, Mr.. Tiugey
said they consisted of all the claims
presented by Judge Johnson with the
salary cut out, and that there we're no
claims for salary. He repeated that
they were all the claims for mileage.
The twenty-one papers were then Of
fered in evidence and were not objected
to-
At this point the court took a recess
until this afternoon at $50.