The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1901-02-15
ARMAMENT INJUNCTION
!. IND BY Judge HoIIister Against the
N JsIfries- Suhliu light es..j
A,pMs GAVE NOTICE. Of APPEAL
@ .,.o rock Exceptions to the
and the Facts in the Find
- Ing of the Court. tfH4
v. 4 ,nhIa t'ebfaaty l4s-rhsts

.,oi
y.,,saa OHIO February itS-Tbers
contest between Jeffries and
aa, a. any one else in saengeriest
n this city tomorrow night and no
.,,e has been fixed for the event.
-. PIN wlll there be any mobilization of
N'. ootslde Of the hall or auywh re
M night or any time In this city
tT.ssn Jeffries and Rubin from nj ct
mere. The permanent inJuGctioA is
~ Indge HOLSTER today aga rs tie
Ns.ssd Championship battle tom Ir
isst ar al any other time has caused
Matte postponement II the arrange
80 a the State and county auLoo y
- ts we'll as Of the promoters OF the
Iest. Jeffries and Rubin still mali
RI aeir quarters, but they are net d.
Z, much training and bo,h esp3ct to
~ for their respective engagements
,r saturday night ard tc Keep their
~. on the Rad next week. a-
when The joint conference adjoirne
.,,lrM IL was announced tina. potai Z
~ been done except to pos p ne in
,Soi,ely the contest 1t was ann ul2ei
M,sitbere would be another m e ing to-
ss,rv at which IL would be dcci led
,s,ther the defendants would carry the
~, 10 the circuit and supreme courts
| IA the contest be postpon d u such
IA as would allow time for counse
,,rry the case to tSe hiAaer courts. w lie
ID such definite Information was re eived
nom the promoters tonight, as eNpec d
y. II Is believed to be due to some con.
itoyersy over the $4,000 forfeit and no. 10
,uy ouestion regarding the injunction.
The pr,moters announced that ey
would abide by the decree of the court
ibsrlutely
Cincinnati, February 14.---Judge Hollis
lg sldsy issued a permanent lnjuucti d
igans; the Jeffries- Rubin contest,
saeiuled for Saengerfest hall in this city
tcmoirow night. The decree Of tac court
pcl manen.ly restrained the managers of
The c6ntestlnts and the Saengertest Ath-
etc association and AL connected with
be proposed event from proceeding at
;sengeafest hall on any date.
Attorneys for the defendants gave no.
Ice Ct appeal and took exceptions to the
sv and facts in the finding OF the court.
lthe case is carried TO the court of last
resort /; is expected that counsel on both
ldes will agree upon a mere entry into
he ci.cu.t court AMI gro. d thence 10
be supreme court next Tuesday. Since
he issue has been raised on an ale eel
Ast.noitn between pr.ze f..ht.nz AID
boxing contests, interested paties on
10th sides seem now to want a dc 81 n
The court OF last resolt in Ohio for a
pesedent IN the future. even If the event
Is indefnt,ely postponed, r. decla ell on.
as seems most prcoaIaie.
Inere was very large crowd at the
soult house IN waiting ali forenoon for
ne hcal decree. The dl. ectors and mem
ueis ot the Sacnge fest Athletic associa-
non' with their counsel; MANAGERS Brady.
hfeds Cook and others were anfong no
NY interested spectators. but i, Is
soup'lul whether they were more in
elssted than thc large assembIage OF
splgymen and other citizens who we
mposng the contest. Nearly all the
"emoe.s OF the Hamilton county bar
w present. judge Hollistcr begal read
" Is dec sion "a 11:25 a. IN. and CON
a.aed at $40 p, m
rue syaie won on all the points at
Y "a law as well as in fact, Out Il was
-l ulIl' the judge reached tine last pa,t
III opinion tina, 1t was possible to tell
W. 90 way he hal decided
reviewing the test .mony the cour
pisised ,ttAt of Manage. B adv. in w5lca
.s'ihed that the contestants wouil 90
neir best to win and that any oth-- k'n1
meeting between Jeffries and Runhn
"Vu De fake on the public. lie e.
ssoN reviewed the testimony # Man
~ Maiden, who held that there had
s, sn no prize fights sine the days CT
bs .sal end that the proposed cents ST
nsse was 20 be on points. TIE crurr
seu the evidence CT Madden, hold: &
~ De insin2ere, While he announced
no ne testimony Of Brady com.aan ced
81 espect OF the court. He then r.
~. lhe contracts between Brady and
eaengerfest Athletic association and
~een Brady and Madden and others.
~ volttact between 3 a1y md Mad en-
r.JV'ue' that thclr men were 10 ngnt
~ Sne rules Of the Marquis y 9ucens-
s,,,. Inc cou~' esd the rul 5 ID
- IA mat contest under them for tire
s,N-aVioasnip Of the world was ce ain y
fn. "shN under the Ohio law and II
go Vie reviewed the three H Us q
referred to by BraIJ, Maccen
~ aers In their evidence.
~, ize nights, unlimited il. the tImn
y number of rounds.
~, :. Scntesis limited n the time o,
n,,,,. ana intermission, hu. not IN the
lumber OF rounds.
contests limited in time and number
Inas and decisions .enisred ther Elm
amy, court held that fatal knockout
ana result under any OF these cllsses
n.,. my any contest for a prize was II
p p,,as nght' in which resort to brutality
eiisssl TAKE place at eny time. The coui
~ Sases at great length In deciding
'nUowing points;
~. mat the following proposed con
,.prh "as to be a rrize night In fact and
TX, Is prohibited upaer the Ohio stat
ua mat the contentious OF the de-
htn's that they proposed to give. a
eontest had not been maintained.
s,;; mat the proposed fight would con-
=, public nuisance such as courts
a'9n,tv are bound to restrain.
~ mat IS a court of equity he had
~. power TO enioln the fght, althonrn
$ legal remedy after It's ocesi