The sun., 1901-01-13

are -uea' r, ,rdeed. would be strange II
direct industry for them, ~ we'll ~ can tn"
Jew .h.r'l holders t"-dn, II manager can
80 ,W'T'"n. "Hh ail ~ il-'. ~ urlns
ruined uv tir tutriSu"- ~ rivHl- ..r',F there
Tl %" ne dni'l.'' IN . tndl9s ,'mHfttens H,tent
4 OF capitalism no longer east
Tn" next sentence shows that br Savage
+ hH- wI-.ou'"IN"d ~" ,Th"i" meaning ni
industrial deuorrtcy lie says: suppose
lot OF Socialists took Charg" Of great
department store and put some one In TO
malaE" %. they would probably run u into
/ ~" ground IN three months What chance
/ that N. man Who would be- appoint"d by
! body - h"u would b" capable oi running
I'.. Hero are ~everal misconceptions In
/ 'ao first place. %" assumes that socialism Is
! merely a'"n'lhuauce OF the present hu>'n"ss
! NyN'"u Socialists 10 assume "hars" 81
store amt pat man IN 10 manage u,
Ner" The doctor familiar with IL" system
b" attempts 70 Crl'lCi>e. he would know that
under socialism trade H. II exists TODAY
would b" a 'hlng Of ihe past. Their" would
h, uu hI.yiug and selling with a view To profit.
n" store would b" converted into dls-
'rluUuug centre, one or more uf which would
| hs -,ud'rd lu each ward and town. lh-~e
tons products, which would be- distributed
TO "pch m accordance win his income So
method ~ distribution IN place OF N" hap
hazard on" Of private enterprise Socialists
do not pretend mat they could he any more
su,c"~otu otul lu running stores under N" present
system than HT" the capitalists, hui they
could not make much worse work Of ~ -h"uld
'n', iis over ~ per cent of all business
W"u tJa' Ibr SuNHg" oNrrlook~ the tact
that under socialism thrr" would bee no need
y ne Hlud Of ahlliy r"dut~It" 10 success
''-dHv NAT KIND oi ability which enable,
opr - tai" the product Of Others labor.
Th" m'n Who en- best p'riorm this feat reaps
ia" sr" tt"t su'C"-~, THIS GuailtN l. usually
,uucd business foresight, commercial HhihN,
Sv 10 ~uy that Socialists would not max"
= -ur'e~N Of lahor-ekinn'pS Is not srra,!y to
their dI~tdN M ~" Socialism Will eliminate
tine uIP. ul an ~llt u abllliY.
hr u'Ai ,aN> Snpp9," hey TOOK charge
u"gl' be put at IA" head uf them'' | hardly
thIuN ~. inr socialism makes no provision
for m"r" parasites and profit tmOngers. Per
who direct tho industry to-day while car:
u"glo i spending his time iu Europe. !
- his absence. hr Savage's difficulty IN
this connection - due Ia hI> error Of con
founding socialism with state ownership
or accommodation, and the mSConCeption,
ALREADY mentioned, OF Suppo~ing that So
,lall-m proposes a COutirudtce OF the present
dr-pirahIr business system lie talks Of
'HIpplutW"ut= and assumes that they
would he made from above. a. IN th" pre-"ut
ciass-orsanizrd society. Under socialism.
gcG Would w f her immrd%i. 3rSrior "rS
and they are better titted To- choose than any
one cl-c hcCal.e they know the qualiiica-
would he selected 1, evident from the fact
that Il would De directly TO the interest ~
all 20 have efficient directors Tho individual
incone would depend upon the social prod
uct, 80 they would he Interested IN securing
the most efficient managers that their labor
might he directed 20 the best advantage.
| nder socialism ability would forge to the
front.
pr savage saws mon capable of running
such enterprises ar" developed IN tho process
~ cnrryinG on such things. Exactly 80.
Industries viii h" carried on in the new order
and capable men will be DEVELOPED the same
~ TO-DAY Remember The capitalist to-day
il not q director. he has handed that function
"a
merely propose Ia eliminate these useless
owners, N" tarnecies. ~" and convert
p!o.eos into salaricd public servants His
illu~traiIpn of tn" hotel proprietor Is seen
in IA" light of The, foregoing TO be aside the
point Instead OF revealing a weak point
in socialism ~ merely reveals "A weak point
IN his criticism.
| now come 20 his other so-ca'lod weak
point lie wants 10 know who, under su-
'.u.l-n'. would h1v" appointed tho men who
are uupnpultr Parker. Claiming. Emerson.
.l,..llH, N.,ha"l Angelo and Shakespeare To- do
their W"fk. "" can 80" no place for such ~
the, u4d"r socialism Us ,hort,ighi"dness
thoucht that everything is 10 be governed 10y
a central committee. a government sepa-
what each l. +" do II lDr, Savage had had
,hn least conception Of what socialism re- ally
T. h" never would have been guilty Of puiriuy
forth such childish objection. A. u matter
Of fact. socialism Will realize tho utmost
freedom lu 4 social democracy each group
v.lu Determine i's own aTair. a. r.Ini.d ia
u~rf mdh" - own rulr, aud regulations,
.l"c' 49, own director, have M" iull product
of ifS toll and thus ,"Uur" real freedom from
aufucrdlIc oppression Out~Ii" ~" economic
sphere, up one contends thit there would ho
les freedom. II l. generally admitted that
socialism would allow full freedom IN 'ie
larger leisure which all would "nioy Two
or three hour, work would suffice To supply
an with N" needs Of life, thus giving nu"
aud opportunity for mental and moral Dc
Nolull.c't Who would appoint ~" Ul'n
Df genius TO do th"Ir work. The very pu"-'Ipp
show a STAT" of confusion IN the du,fur.S
mind that IL worse oufOuuded
socialism would not appoint he men of
genius 10 do their work, " would NOT be neCc~-
sary all that would be required is 70 give them
opportunity aud full freedom This social.
lAIn would do. IL would secute 70 all SUIT