The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, 1901-11-15

L. y. address,; Rooms to A. ROCKWELL
Building, Seattle, King County, Wash
ington-
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King County.
Machlas Lumber Company, corpora
Charles Niemeyer, Jr., Plaintiffs, vs..
Andrew Streicher, Defendant No.
33,913. Summons by Publication.
Inc State of Washington, to the said
Andrew Streicher defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication of this summons, to-wit:
W NI sixty days after the, Sth day of
entitled action in the above entitled
court, and answer the complaint of the
plaintiffs and serve a copy of your
answer upon the undersigned attorneys
for plaintiffs, at their office elbow
stated; and in case of your failure so to
do, Judgment will be rendered against
you according to the demand of the com
paint, which has been filed with the
clerk Of said court. The object of the
said action is to recover the sum of one
hundred eighteen dollars and tifty-seven
cents ($llS3O for lumber sold and deliV-
cred to the defendant at the defendants
request, and for a writ of attachment to
issue against the property of the defend
ant. BRADY & GAY,
Plaintiffs Attorneys.
Postoffice Address: Rooms 10 to IA Rox-
We'll Bldg, Seattle, King County, Wash
lngton.
IN THE SUPERIOR &C CRT OF THE
state of Washington fot the County of
King. Teckla G. Hughes, plaintiff, VS..
Thomas Hughes, defendant. No. 32S98.
summons by publication.
The State of Washington to Thomas
Hughes
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication Of this summons, to-wit:
within sixty days after the 9Th day of
september, A. ID. 1901, and defend the
above entitled action nj the above entitled
court, and answer the complaint of the
plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer
upon the undersigned attorney for plain
TIL at his office below stated; and in case
of your failure so to do, Judgment will
De rendered against you according to the
demand of the complaint, which has been
hled with the clerk of said court. The OBJ
Ject of this action, set forth in the COM
plant, is as follows: That the above ac-
ton is instituted by the plaintiff to secure
divorce from the defendant on the
ground of desertiOn and non-support
w. I'll. BUI'TNEk, Attorney for Plaintiff
T. .. address, 513 Third avenue Seattle
Washington.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King County.
Joseph COnigno, plaintiff. VS.. Josephine
Comgho, defendant. No. Sum-
mons.
State of Washington to said Josephine
Conigno:
You are hereby summoned to appear
WlthIn sixty 600 days after the date of
the IrSt publication of this summons In
VII: sixty 600 days after the 18th day of
october, 1901, ana defend the above en-
1Jled action in the ABOVE entitled cOurC:
and answer the complaint Of the pain
LII, and serve a copy of your answer
! upon the undersigned attorneys for plain
! LIT at their UfTIce UeioW stated: and IN
case OF your failure to do judgment
VIII be rendered against you according to
the demand OF the complaint which mas
oeen 1lled with the clerk Of said court.
iS
Drought is to secure a divorce upon the
grounds of abandonment
ROOT, PALMER & BROWN,
Attorneys for PlalntIif
PostOffice Address: 533 Pioneer BuIld-
ing, Seattle, Washington.
FIRST publication, October %.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
state Of Washington, in and for the
county Of King. John Dwight Tired
way, plalntlL, VS.. GuilIlom1ne Eva
Tredway, defendant Department No
:. No 1860, Summons Tor Service by
PubucatlOn.
Inc State of Washington to the said
GulllOmlne Eva YredWay, defendant:
You are hereOy summoned to appear
within sixty 600 days after the
nrst publication OF this summons to-
VII: within sixty (6O days after the 25th
LAY OF october, 1901, and defend the
ABOVE emitted action, in the above en-
| Tilted court; and answer the COMPLAINT of
1he plalnlnf, and serve a copy of your
| Tor plalntIff, at their office below stated
AND Ill case OF your failure so to do
! judgment will be rendered against YOU
according to the demand of the COMPLAINT
| when mas been filed with the clerk of
said court.
me object Of the above entitled action
IS TO obtain a decree of divorce, dissoIv-
ing the bonds OF matrimony. now existing
| between plaintiff and defendant on the
| ground OF abandonment
Dated, Seattle, Washington, October
! z3rd. 1YU1
HUMPHREYS & BOSTWICK.
Attorneys Tor PIaIntlff. Office and p. D.
ADDRESS: 6O1-6Oz The Mutual Life
Mutual Life building, Seattle, KING
county, Washington.
,oI Date OF first publication, October Is.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
| State of Washington for the County Of
hlng. Mary Mcdonald, plaintiff. VS.
DanieI Mcdonald, defendant No
| Summons by FupIicatt ton
| Inc State OF washington to the said
daniel Mcdonald, defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
| Wlthln sixty days after the date of the
IlIst publication of TINS summons, to-Wit:
"lthln Sixty days after the 10Th dav of
| Oclopef, l9Ul, and defend the above en-
UCIed action IN the above emitted court
ana answer the complaint of the pIaintiff
anu serve copy OF your answer upon
the Undersigned attorney for PLAINTIFF at
ms Office below stated; and IN case of
your failure so to DO, Judgment Will he
rendered against you according to the
uelnahd OF me complaint, which has been
| A1ed with the clerk OF said court
/ Inc object of the ABOVE entitled action
= 70 OBTAIN decree OF divorce by pam
III from defendant on the ground that
ue1ehuant neglected and refused 10 make
suitable provisions for mis- family.
! ]. +. BALL,
Attorney for PlaIntlIf
T. o. Address: Suite IS koxWeu Block
/ M 4 XAt.,.
LATE OF first publication, OCTOBER z5.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT or THE
! State of Washington for the County of
hlhS- In probate. In the matter of the
! estate OF Elizabeth S. Gilbert, deceased.
NO 1892. Order to Snow Cause
! Inc above enttled matter coming on to
Oe heard upon this z4rh day OF October
I9uI, upon the peudon Of Sarah A. Ken
| ual, administrative nerein for the safe
! u the following described CIaIIam county
warrants. to-WIt:
Date- No Amount.
! FEBRUARY 5, 1896 . 4y5 < y M
| Novoyoto 20 Ao2o :'''''....'......265 ESQ
] november 10, 1896 ........ ....Zyy 30O
| ,N+'J,--, io't -. '...........464 20.00
~ 1873 $500. .........934 $40. OO
AT private sale, and it duly aDnearino to
| the court, that 1t is necessary In sell S7,roo
uL the personal estate OF SAID deceased in
OIuer To pay the expenses OF Inc IaSt i'll
| 440"0 VI Sd4O deceased, ana the funeral ax
PeIlSeS OIL SAID deceased, ana To nav me
expenses OF administration and If t,Irthar
uuly appearing TO the court tnaL there il
not Su1IlclenU funds IN the HANDS of said
duLIInlSIrdtrlX to pay SaId expenses and
lndC SAID admlnlSLraCrlX mas received ~
o41er from one X. T.. BarStoW Of x5l.l
"lllch IS S59.56 more than the appraised
Ne'lue cor; ana ii Iurtner uuIv an
pedIInS TO the court that it will ne for
the pest interest TO SAID estate to sell
od1o warrants at private sale ana thar
more can be realized IMAM by a Dubnc
sale therefor. O
NOW therefore: 1t is by the court. he
ING uuIy ADVISED III the premises order
eu' lnaC all persons Interested IN sad
estate De ana appear before TINS court on
I1ody, the otn uay OF November ar tha
1iOur Oh S'SU CLOCK IN the moInlno ar
9d1u udy, IN department NO i of sa1d
court; and then ana there to snow cans,
Il any they nave why saIu petluon sholIId
n.y. pe granted ana Sald warrants sold at
PI4Vdle oa1e, ana tAaJ copy OIL TINS order
a pupAISleu IN some newspaper puDIisn-
eu IN hlhS county once a week lor twr
weeks, AMI mat three copies hereof he
posted as required by law
lone IN open court this 24th dav Of
OCTOBER, 1901. u