The Wilmington daily Republican. (Wilmington, Del.) 1890-1902, 1901-07-22
BARNEY
KNOCKED 0Uq.
Court in BanC Gives De-
cision Against McVey
And Also Against Is
Sayers.

! nav IAsoo 1A6~anos
| Sayers.
Court in banc handed down two
Important decisions this morning,
one in favor of the Wilmington and
Northern Railroad and the other the
State.
i McVey and Witsil are no longer
detectives and will not be able to
collect salary since the law abolish
ing their office was enacted. The de-
cision follows. "a.
State of Delaware upon the rela-
ton of Bernard J. McVey vs.. Mar
tin B. Burris, State Treasurer of the
State OF Delaware.
This is an application for writ of
peremptory mandamus to compel
Martin B. Burris, State Treasurer OF
the State Of Delaware. the respondent
to pay to Bernard J. McVey, the re-
lator, the sum Of one HUNDRED dollars
being as he alleges the amount due
him on salary as state detective for
the month ending April l, 1901.
The facts were agreed upon in a
oaso e'a.eu anu '"o Iat'',on ". L."
la''.u 'ne.e'n' W. Jo.M. app,1o"' ~
Court to be heard by the Court in
Banc.
n' onv os'I ,n oc" 49, ~pI" '"".
wy io".ol N"u oosn ios u.a.'i "p
U.".. a,o aua We" ".n, ~" w
us ol,i0e % s, . uo'1 1on, on une
' ."o'..n 10y ~. y. M .a". ' s ~ "p
Po.n.'" ., ~ q .eIn' " W. ye"as'
u WV ., InG '.o''s'on s,o y. w.apte a+ VI,
WI - Ma"1 VI h.'a"a'o' 'naC AID
'oI,l vi olnoE nau NV 0A1'' e"p'..u.
ny ~. ~ .'le ue ,an, Asse l a.
proven MaiI!l -, i9oi, aalo Nnap VI
was iePea'eu anu nauo nu'. anu
solu Thereby .Le on'oe VI ''a'e oe'
'eG,i'e was aoo'l'i'cu. o, ....,,..
by "co " ulo ue'i va, hoaeino'y
'pp p.ato dotootimo ,v,. w nstn h,,shaJ
b,t tho ro,otor wos not va onnnintod
, ~ wy ~ Iast nomad oot 0''
" N.Y. .n,. t .",' claws ,nat .ho ro,,o,,
,nn nv not o W Mach 10 ,onI ts vaid W.
' 'ns 49, a,;n,a ~ eaot;a 90 ~ KY 80 80"
s,itn,;un ~ 1so7 rhinh reads 0 WI
mt sha,i o,tond tno torn y,
INV ~, r,,,,io s nsiaor nnr di n h Ir
"nI !, r. p1D ,a,,,,nonts ,,tar ris o,an
IT," ~ onnnintman+ :"
WI Ia " i, s aPp th,s n,n,nrtto, ~, tvo
r'>,,n,, p"'0 ''' WI ''"''o" "" WV
'1u''u un,t ,,o ,h.>,;,,r,o,t 20 ,,s
,,moo tan,' o 'mo " ,,is sn,ann 20" +h ,o
un.Hl .oo w ,,s torn, ,"d ,Sorohu vi,
i,, s1,Iu " n m's sa law "''' '" "
. '', Th,t '' tho . aIho,;sh,oo+ If tho
omoo 80 10" st,to d"taa,ino y" ~. ~
Maro,, 70 ' I"oI w,ro 0 o,,v a ~ indiroot
1a "I - i ,';n,;';si,,n u H. ~ saInrn w
NV no'o t w. '. nrd n"'t 'n ANY, nda ~
no o ~ 1l,,. "u v ,"i, thn oeioo
wv W. v vi I Iaai mi.h ~ lattnr ro;o+
a. w "N' '."' WIN o"s '"''0' p0'N'
Aisu.
mere is no evidence IN tllis case
INA. 'llere WIS any lack OF uoIla l'ues
on the part on inc LEGISLATURE IN
passing these acts. Inc presnmp-
tlon OF law Is III FAVOR OF soou laiIn.
LEVch II there was lack OF bona
ldes on the parI OF the members OF
the LEGISLATURE; wha1 f1sht "ou'd
TINS Court nave 10 pass upon tnat
su0leel II what the Legs azure dld
was Wlllilh It's power
" ~, ,,e. ma. :! 49, ~ eoou ."'.n' Hnu
ior .l'e pesI '!'oeieH's, vi 'hc puo'io,
~ cn''reIy peu"eei tne nlel'oc's , anu
.ne'n col,s'IVu s, eo ,ons ~ .nuy
connne themselves .n, w,'i u; 'ne lllhl.s
VI .ilelt au.lio''.y. ~ ID ao .u.Io1'oli
.. 'h's NouiI 70 Pass upo'l wv nio'
yves Vi 'ne icy 's,a'ulc III 'lle o's-
charge ol ,heil uucy.
IL is we" setIleu tnat ollces gre
ated ov the Legislature arc ent IRE.
~ "l'h,n Les's'atlVe Gon'ro'' mat
the elft OF such ac once IS NOT
contract unless mere DC some Toa'
st'tat'ohal LIMITATION ouch olices
may De mod'hed' aoriased or aool'
isheu as Inc Legislature may see
| n n.