The daily morning journal and courier. [volume] (New Haven, Conn.) 1894-1907, 1901-04-03

of Fulton street. The allowance made
by them was $76.
julia Mckinney VS.. the city Of An
sonia, is to recover $4,000 damages foi
| driving into pile OF coal on the night
of January 4, 1901. The injuries consist
| ed of a crushed face.
Mary Vincent VS.. the Mutual Reserve
Fund Lie association is an action ia
recover $1,000 insurance for which bi-
monthly payments OF S5.IS nave been
paid upon the life Of the plaintiff's
mother, Ann Murphy, since February
| 10, 1891. The defense to the action does
not appear
| Maria l.. Brown vs. Arthur l.. Brown
| concerns an Ansonia family difficulty.
| In 1898 the plaintiff, through her agent,
Jacob Fisse, divided certain real estate
among her children IN the understand
ms that the defendant was not to set
his until he had paid the plaintiff $500
which he is alleged to have owed her.
l7islle on the following day, without
consulting the plaintiff, OF receiving the
aforesaid 5000, recorded the deed, The
defendant has refused to play, and now
the plaintiff sues both her son and her
agent. The court Is asked to establish
the rights Of the plaintiff.
Anna Bohn administrators Of the es-
tate of Henry Bohn, VS.. Seymour G.
Linsey, all Of Branford.
The allegation is that previous to his
death Bohn loaned defendant $1,000 for
which the Administrative now sues,
claiming $4,000. Harrison and zacher
bring the action.
Ellwood r. Clark, Of 81 Union avenue,
West Haven, VS.. Clarence r. Thompson,
executor of the estate of David B.
Wheeler, Yale university. VS.. James
Donohue, ct al, foreclosure of mort
gage on Green street; Slater Engine Co.
VS.. Griest Manufacturing Co.; Mrs
Martha Schottlander VS.. Miss Libbie
Ortseifer, alienation suit: NJ j. Bee
CAMS appeal from probate.
FORECLOSURES RETURNED.
The following land and foreclosure
eases We're returned to the superior
court yesterday: M
Eliza Thomas and Henry Thomas,
both of Orange, VS.. Fannie A, Smith,
Marcus P. Smith, Mary A. Dickerman.
r. Charles Dickerman and George e.
Thomas. This is a suit asking for Sale
of real estate located at 43 Prince street,
in which the defendants each own one
fourth. ,4ss
r. l.. Baldwin VS.. Thomas w Russell,
both Of Meriden, foreclosure of a note
issued July 20, 1888, for Ransom, Bald
win, who Is now deceased. The amount
was $1,000 and the property is on Will
low street, Meriden
r. l.. Baldwin VS.. Thomas w. Russell,
foreclosure of note of $500, secured by
property in Wallingford.
Eneas Warner vs.. Daniel Jackson ct
al, foreclosure of note of 81 700, secured
by property on Orange street.
The Cooperative Building bank VS.
Peter Kennedy foreclosure Of note of
Sc, 900. secured by property on Daggett
street tsGss
The Connecticut Savings bank vs. M.
Fl. Dorman to foreclose on note Of ST.
SOC, secured by property on Exchange
street. I'll.
James Holohan VS.. William III. Kane,
Of note Of $1,000 upon prop
erty in Ansonia.
Sophie Bonnet, of Brooklyn. N. r., VS.. |
Edward GorenfIos w. J.NAtwater, Fran
ces c. Porter and Darius A, Porter,
suit Of note dated December I
20, 1900, for $2,4ss, secured by mortgage
upon land at AN Elm street. Frances
c. Porter is in possession of the prem
ises The defendant, Atwater, claims to
have assignment Of the rents, Fitzger- /
aid & Walsh bring the action.
Louis A. Mansfield, of this city, vs.. |
Mary Seymour Pratt, of New York,
Burton Mansfield, the Warner Miller
the John f. Bassett compa-
n.y. Thompson & Belden and Thomas ].
Rice The first. count shows that on
April 6, 1900, june 81 Barber and Mar
tin Conlan were in possession of land +
IN Harriet street in which the former |.
held legal title and the latter sole qui-
-y.