Arizona republican., 1901-03-15
skINNING OF MR. IVES
Continued From First Page.)

pr. Ford replied briefly to MT Per" kins, but entered neither into the mer- its of the rendtng bill nor the facts Of the investigation. Mir. Riordan said that he believed that nothing in MT Ives speech regarding either the bill CT the shortcomings of the auditor had anything to do with the case There had been no showing whatever of ir- regularity and the speaker asserted that if he had been auditor he would have done as the auditor had done. Concerning the bill itself which was the question before the house, MT Riordan said he saw nothing improper in it and would theresRre vote for It.
 MIR. F1NLEY'S DISCLOSURE.
 The announcement by MT. Riordan of his intention left little doubt that the bill would pass. It was rumored that MT. Finley and Dr. Claypool had wearied of Mir Ives leadership and would probably support the veto. How ever, the interest lay mainly in the proceedings that had already taken place. and aside from the president no one had breaphless interest in the result. MT Finley. however. threw the most startling incident into the sit uation. When his name was reached in the roll call he rose and said in the tone -f a man who was laboring un- der load of disgust at bad bargain, that 'he desired to explain his vote. The bill itself he believed to be worthless and useless. 'I believe" said he. there Is more of buncoTe than good judgment in 1t, but as a member of a party caucus pledged to support this and other measures, l am going to re- deem my promise and vote for it." Half an hour before Mr. Ives had de- nled that the bill was a party measure.
 The voting then proceeded upon the question, Shall codncil bill No. ll2 pass the council the objection of the governor notwlthstandlng?'
 The result was as fellows: Ayes Andrews. Blair. Burr, Claypooi. Fin ley. Ford, Riordan, shannon, the pres ident--9. Nays Campbell, Perkins, Warner-3.
 The business of the afternoon was ended and the contest was passed over to the house where it wi'I 10 doubt he resumed this morning.
 THE ORDER OF THE HOUSE.
 MT. Barkley presented a memorial to congress in relation to the bill pro- viding for new building for the uni- versity. urging it's early ratification.
 Mir. Kimball introduced house bill lS2. to repeal act % of the Twentieth Ia, ic1 1a In fp, tnrritnpit itt quarantine which, he explained. had been found to be inadequate and ex- pensive. Later in the day MT. Kim. ball introduced house bill 1Si, author. izing the establishment of quarantines by boards of supervisors Mir. Ivy sug- gested an amendment providing fer territorial action in the case O. a threatened general invasion. Mr St. Charles, who is constitutionally up- posed to territorial interference. uc- lieyed that either bubonic plague pr yellow fever was preferable to the paternahsm proposed by Mir. Ivy. The bill was sent tp the committee on coun ties and county boundaries.
 MT St. Charles introduced house bill ls3. to regulate public printing by pro. viding the manner of payment for r.. This is designed to be supplementary to the printing bill which lately passed both houses and which, though drawn by the publishers themselves. curiously contains no arrangement for reinuner- ation.
 House bill 95. In relation to tho gov ernment of towns and cities, more par ticularly Tempe, was defeated by a combination of representatives from other towns. which wanted some othe. style of charter.
 House bill No. 95. better known as the Campbell bHl, was taken up and on the point of passage was recom- mitted with the purpose of amending 1t so az to meet the needs of Tempe.
 STARRING FOR WIND.
 At this point council bill 1O7 was reached in regular order. The friends of Mir. Ives had been unable to gather strength to pass the bill over the gov ernor's veto and MT. Barker. who wae responsible for the unprecedented hoIl ing back of action on veto, again moved for a postponement to 2:S0. The friends of the governor offered no oh jection They were not only confident that Mir Ives could never again collect his scattered forces. but they were also apathetic, Whatever might happen, the result would be the same. The anxiety was quite one-sided. If anybody but Mir. Ives felt any interest 1t was na more active than the interest in 8 cock-fight without stakes, mere sen. timent of curiosity.
 The report cf the conference cUn,- m!ttee on house bin No 90, for the protection of game and game birds. was adopted.
 House bill 16s. fixing semi-annual license of si0o for games of chance and amending paragraph 543 of the penal code, making cheating at all games T felony punishable by a fine of not moro than $1,000 or a sentence of two years In the penitentiary, was passed. Two objections had been raised to the bill. One was that 1t would reduce the rev. enue from games. and the other that 1t would throw a protection around games the same as around a legitimate busi- ness. MT. Bernard, the author of the bill, denied that 1t would have the for mer effect. It would. how ever, have the effect of dlscouraglng operators of sure thing games.
 House bill 15a. providing that no