The true northerner. [volume] (Paw Paw, Mich.) 1855-1920, 1901-09-13
CIRCUIT COURT.
THE SEPTEMBER TERM NOW IN SESSION,
GRINDING OUT BIG CALENDAR.

divorce. Decree granted.
Myrnie Clark VS.. Frank Clark; divorce.
Decree granted.
William Carter VS.. Lille Carter di-
yorce Decree granted.
Martha Strong VS.. Sam b. Strong;
divorce. Decree granted.
Fred G. Tanner VS.. Mile A. Tanner;
divorce. Decree granted.
Henrietta Stocum VS.. William III.
Stocum: divorce. Decree granted.
Nellie M. Selby VS.. Henry l.. Selby;
divorce. Decree granted.
Myrtle Smith VS.. Willis Smith; divorce.
Decree granted.
The people VS. Viola Brakeman; larceny.
Cause dismissed
The people VS.. Charles r. Abel; viola
ton of local option law. Continued by
consent.
The people VS.. Edward Il. Napier:
violation of local option law, 1st case.
Respondent withdrew his plea of not
guilty and pleaded guilty. Fined 500
and $50 costs; paid.
The people VS.. Edward f.. Napier;
violation of local option law, I'd case.
Dismissed.
The people VS.. John H. Charles: viola
ton of local option law. Dismissed.
The people VS.. Harry Eby; assault
and battery. Plea in abatement filed;
plea sustained on the ground of defective
proceedings by the examining magistrate.
The people VS.. Jesse f.. Goodrode; viola
ton of local option law, lst and ID cases.
Motion to quash information on the
ground that the alleged ofTense was not
properly set forth; motion granted.
The people VS.. Jesse E. Goodrode; viola
ton of local option law, Sd, 4th and 9th
cases. Respondent arraigned and pleaded
not guilty in each case.
The people VS.. Jesse h. Goodrode and
Irving Harley; violation of local option
law, Respondents arraigned and pleaded
not guilty.
The people VS.. Jesse +. Goodrode and
Oscar p. Goodrode; violation of local
option law, Respondents arraigned and
pleaded not guilty.
The people VS.. John Adler; SANDER.
Respondent arraigned and pleaded not
guilty.
The people vs. Glenn Halves; larceny.
Respondent arraigned and pleaded not
guilty.
William f.. Goodrode VS.. Maurice
Keasey; appeal from justice court. Con-
tinued by consent
Rhett Gould VS.. Albert T.. Gregory;
case. Motion to stay proceedings denied;
motion for additional security for costs
denied; cause continued by consent.
Frank Potts vs.. Georgietta Graham;
assumpsit. Continued by consent.
Frank Z. Roosevelt vs.. Seth S. Fassett;
case. Continued 10y consent
Jackson Sleigh Co. vs.. Andrew Gaynor;
replevin. Continued by consent
Ed. Bailey VS.. James L. Abrams; case
Continued by consent.
Charles a. Brown VS.. Samuel r. Bower
man ct al; ejectment. Continued by
consent.
Pabst Brewing Co. VS. T.. r. Napier;
assumpsit Continued by consent.
Ira Branch vs.. Sylvanus Castleman;
assumpsit. This cause was originally
tried before Justice Kelly of Lawrence,
who rendered a judgment of no cause of
action. The case was appealed to the
circuit court, where, on account of de-
fective affidavit and for other reasons
the appeal vas dismissed. The plaintiff
having died, George w. Fisher was duly
appointed as administrator. Messrs.
Hammond ~ Hammond, representing
the plaintiff, and the administrator sub
sequently entered into a stipulation re-
Installing the case, the administrator con-
senting that a judgment should be enter
ed against the estate in the sum of $500.
The only estate was certain realty which
the decedent had conveyed to a son,
but suit in chancery is pending seek
ing a cancellation of such conveyance.
Prosecuting Attorney Anderson, rep
resenting the interest of this son, appeared
in court and sought to have the judg
ment set aside After hearing Mr..
Anderson in support of his motion to
vacate the judgment and Mr.. A. L. Ham
mond in opposition thereto, the Judge on
his own motion ordered the judgment
set aside on the ground that the manner
in which it was obtained was fraud on
the court.
The people VS.. Lewis Burhans; burg
larry. l.. A. Tabor appointed to defend;
order that defendants witnesses be sub
poenaed at expense of the people.
The people VS.. John Greene; statutory
rape. Respondent tried and verdict of
guilty returned.
The people VS. Frank Conrad, statutory
rape. This case was on trial all day
yesterday and will get to the jury some
time to-day.
CONSUMPTION THREATENED.-C. Unger,
l.. A 10. II