The Hawaiian star. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu]) 1893-1912, 1901-08-05
c: AR 5 LONG CATNDAR
CASES CALLED THIS MORNING
AND SET.
Criminal Matters Go Over-Divorce
Cases set for the Noon Hours OF the
Coming Two Weeks.

Judge Gear called his calendar of
296 cases this morning and passed or
set the various trials. The criminal
cases and nearly all the others were
answered ready and the criminal trials
were passed Civil matters will have
the attention of the court for the pres
ent, unless some of the prisoners to be
tried shall ask for trials at once
The case of Mahoahoa VS.. Tai Bun.
ejectment, was set for tomorrow.
Dickey is for plaintiff and Creighton
and I<aneakua for defendant. Divorce
cases were set for the noon hours of
almost every day for the next two
weeks beginning with the case of Evan
geline Strauss VS.. Leon NJ. Strauss at
II tomorrow.
The following cases were passed ow-
ing to disqualification of Judge Gear,
either on account of his having been
interested as counsel or in some other
way: S. Ahmi VS.. Annie Waller, ct al.
j. p. Mendonca VS. George Markham,
Rosamond Naylor VS.. Orpheum COM
pany, Mace Bonville VS.. Orpheum COM
pany, Honolulu Investment Co. VS..
Wilson and Whitehouse company, j. l..
HOwland vs. Byron o. Clark, Eugene
Avery VS.. The Hawaiian Gazette COM
pany Eugene Avery VS.. w. G. King,
Henry Zerbe VS.. The Honolulu Tobac-
co company. David Dayton. guardian
VS.. Helen X. Rowland ct al. Honolulu
Investment Co., VS.. X. Rowland ct al.
John Cook VS.. f. Colt Hebron. John
Loeffler VS.. Palama Cooperative Gro
Gerry company, II. w. Hebron VS..
Charles L. Helm, e. Fl. f. Wolter VS.
F, H. Redward, G.. f. Gouveia VS., T. r.
Walker, ct al, trustees, Rita G. VS.
Irving X. Tewsbury, divorce.
The following cases were continued
to a special term of the court after
the present term: c. f. Jeune VS.
Campbell and Pettus, l.. l.. McCan-
dless VS.. Samuel Andrews. A. r. Tit
low VS.. Albert Whyte, ct al, r. Isaacs
SS Bro. VS.. Pacific Import company. TC
the November term: Republic of Ha-
wall VS.. Oahu Railway and Land COM
pany, S. Kauai VS.. John X. Sumner et
al, H. ]. Harrison VS.. A. NJ. Brown
Naomi Kaaihue VS.. Kalanihuia, T. V
King VS.. Charles S. Desky, Minnie
/ Merrill VS.. Loren w. Merrill, Lena A
Kumalae VS.. John Kumalae. L. b. Nit
ting VS.. Henry r. Worthington was
continued for two weeks.
Discontinuances We're entered or Civ
en- notice of in the divorce suit of Ke
apuni Kakaha VS.. Kahapiilani and IL
F. j. Cabral VS.. N. j. Luiz, Gehrine
| and Butzke VS.. Campbell and Minton
pany. The case of G. f. Robert, trus
tee VS.. S. Kauai ct al, was stricker
| off the calendar
Brooks was entered as succeeding
Paul Neumann in the case of Toni Sa
yami VS.. Bujui Komatso and Hatch
| and Silliman for Neumann in the cast
of c. Brown VS. the Equitable Life In
surance company. Brooks was enter
ed for plaintiffs in Gehring and Butzk'
VS.. Horita.
The case of II. r. Mossman VS.. Emily
! p. Judd ct al, was fixed upon as tes
case for eight others of a similar ma
ture. 1t Is an action to quiet title
| The other cases. entered as ready witt
the understanding that this case shoult
furnish test are T. r. Mossman VS.
S. NJ. Damon, ct al, Lucy X. Peabody
ct al, VS.. II. r. Macfarlane. ct al, c
X. C. Rookie VS.. Mary M. Seabury e
al, Lucy X. Peabody VS.. S. M. Damon
ct al, Lucy X. Peabody VS.. Emily +
Judd ct al, Lucy X. Peabody VS..
b. Dole, ct al. trustees, T. r. Moss
man VS.. Henry r. Macfarlane, ct al