The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1901-01-16
VOW WIN THE 81 PRFMF 'O' RI
,Io,s Of Argument. on ,s'rs in'"i'ing the
constitution aud the Has

N~,-ur>uru>. Jan 80 NrNhfm ~''h,
q, counsel for ,ru-,g.un \ krutI"r. TO-DAY ''i'
trurt ~ ur. .r"ut an ~" N%tIl'"n" '". 3
r.nu ne appeal % ul, clients from tur IL
usut uI the Circuit tuir' Tor the southern
District oi Sew lurA That ln" pislutif~ .u-i
pay duties on Irupnrtat.on- 'nl" "" N"'N "'
whl-ary. brandy and arm from in- ha~alan
Islands. under the provision "i 'h" f'N"''
ttyn Of annexation. Which continued 80 ly.u"
uuUI torgg-,, shall Otherwise ."s''H'r '''
t.rIi regulations, u-tW"~u litwau aud tu'
United state, and all other 'ouu'rl",
fur a., Government Interested "a wt'n-
t,.a.us tne validity ~ the provision of Co."
us1aAan resolution 90 ANNEXATION. Which
tti been attacked In this case. solicitor
General Richards appeared There ,u.ii
not 30 a case. he sad which more ''rH.'
Illustrated that ab-uIdI'y Of I'll" broad '''.
lcutlon : opposing cpunse. IN the pending
case, the contention that Immediately upon
acquisition hy whatever means 'lnil"E'i
Of any territory % became AN Integral paw
Of IA. United state, -IhIe't T." he HuDl't-
tlun> Of the Constitution respecting IT." law
- me date Of the annexation resolution
July E. l,yN, there we're np laws "i N" I hli'd
states In force there. nor anb agents "i "l
rrrr, Of me rIsd States there &, chr'u'"
IN. laws had they been tier" Ana l"' lN"
,nrfeu,iin /, that Immediately upon lN"
approval 81 th" resolution 81 Nn,'Ntll'u
HrpnHi,o were ,iprd ont Il existence Ih"
iY.I.lI result ~ his, ~" said, was thl' NoN "a
would ~ thrown open I" ne ',.I" e., ,hi
states opened to the goods ~ me vn.Ii Fl..-
ont the pnvm"ut OF a cent u' dl'N lttI
tb,t been the case. ha ASKED, Nan % 'u--1u.'
that Congress Mould have passed the I'-HI-
non and accepted the Islands, N'h"r"hai h"'n
no tine available Ia which I oheI'-" ma mo
President could Irepafs ior we r't'h'iui!
uf the lave Of tho I uited states 20 them, and
the oIgauiGation OF "a government for i'"
i,.,ud-.
t.n,u when ice sIi t'lt lu - ''"dtw"'t ~
Hawaii. ~" philippines uni ll't, la'n '"
ttn,rrunruf had blow q hot aud blow cuii.
treating them ~ io'",Su i~"irt'i' "hth ",tr
WA, money g. b." made "u' u them. amt do
mestlc territory when money as Lk"Iy =" n'
uaId ont ON their account Ana u %-nnln't
inns h. r.ierrod To- "a decision hv the Treasury
beisrtmcut regarding drawback 81 dn'e0'
which he said au.lsd =" ,uair ut'M"ri l'l.'
sage III the porto iican tarr law ,"ur-e.
wa mistaken IN that. i"f w." G"'I-lon iil'd
since then, sad IN" N"H,t''' 'rt"in. i'
dutIrs hai been c~"l,-ct"d ,u iu" b ili"i state
uu lmportptlou- iron. l'it' lt," Nld'N ' ,,""-
ur, Department SAID tln' 'hhI iO' 900" Porto
R,rnuut ot ~" t.' of i'r".N IN '"1lt l". ~. "
meaning Of the DRAWBACK u.' h' lu { d'
-',u . d~t.'ln.tinr vt, made hriHr.u Port.
Rico aud tie lIHUpiur'~ Nn-W"'Iig g."-.
lion. Iy m-mn"r~ o.. iu" toufi. Nj Il.NuJ-
rontrnard tlit ,"ugI"-s tad n'n'." i'y"r
lry"' M" 'vUf II' .i ~ l'''N' w '' . i''L
Justices and Associate" ~Jn-'l,"- OF i.. court
- max, nil r|o,.liIl rIi,~ AM regulations 'n1
,,nvorrlnc and dispensing OF Go" territory ul
I trIt"d states
A. G o'c.o.k tho argument on '0" -"y"u
cases involving III. ,nu-t'.tn't. tf t."
tnui relations nf ~" I Mtrd Stt'"- NTH
NnVaII I,iWrou We date ~ ~" aH'''n' ..
resolution. AUX g. l>a>. and ~" 'o-l.r "N",t
of 80. a,t ,-tun.-'IUg q E1h'.|H" y.' fuf
Hawai-. 1--we o.. 1900. Hui VITA ln'tn Iu.u
md lie philippine stands s.u.o 81" ia'h.,-
H.. Of the Treaty ~ Pans. Vl.. .t-,I ll,Ius
u.,ui rd 'hr tuna, and attention u' 1N" 'nUrt
trr .FSi q week.