The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1901-03-15
CT R | T
COURT.
NunerousProbate
Cases Set for
To-day.
FkAHOOKANO HEIRS
FILE AN ANSWER
u
Stockholders Of Unfortunate Ka.
malo Plantation Get the Big
Judgment Of $l75,00O.


lowing is list of the cases SO far certi-
| fed:
Fugihara Oriemon VS.. Territory of Ha-
wall: error to Fourth Circuit Court. Bit
ting & Maydwell for plaintiff in error;
Attorney General for defendant in error.
I In re Boundaries of Kukuau first: APP
peal from Commissioner, Island of Ha-
wall. Attorney General and Smith &
Parsons for appellants; Kinney, Ballou
& McClanahan and Bigelow for appellee.
]. S. Fowler & Co. VS.. r. Cation ct al. !:
appeal from Circuit Judge. First Cir
cult. Hatch &. Snliman and Robertson
& Wilder for neutrality-suspicious.; Kim
ney, Ballou & Mechanism and Holmes
& Stanley for defendants.
N S. Sachs Dry Goods Co VS.. ]. Q.
Spencer ct al: appeal from District
Court of Honolulu. Andrews for plain
! tiff-appellant; Peterson & Mattewman for
defendants
Hawaii Land Co. vs.. Nettie L. Scott:
appeal from District Court of North ho-
ma. Achi 4 johnson tor plalntlI; An
drews for neutrality-suspicious..
keauhou ct al. VS.. N. EwaIiko: appeal
from Circuit Judge, First Circuit Ma
COON e. Thompson for pla. ntiffS-appei-
In re estate of Alma: appeal from Cir
cult Judge, First Circuit. Thayer Tor
petitioners; Thompson for respondent
appellant
Territory Of Hawaii VS.. M. Abreu:
appeal from District Court OF Hoho.uid.
Long for neutrality-suspicious.; Attorney
] General for appellee.
Wong Kwai VS.. Liliuokalani: appeal
from Circuit Judge, FIRST Circuit. An
drews for plaintiff: Robertson & Wilder
for defendant-appellant.
/ C. NJ. LIE Blond VS.. Solomon Konia: ex.
ceptions from Fourth Circuit Court
| Cathcart & Ridgway for plaintiff; Wise
& Nickeus for neutrality-suspicious..
! Isaac Erickson VS.. Volcano s. & t.
| Co.: exceptions from Fourth Circuit.
| Smith & Parsons for plaintiff; Wise &
Nickeus for defendant-appellant.
Volcano S. & t. Co. vs. Hayashi ct al:
error to Fourth Circuit Court. Wise &
Nickeus for plaintiff in error; Smith &
Parsons for defendant in error.
! Robert Gillespie VS.. Robert McBryde:
exceptions from Fourth Circuit Court.
Smith & Parsons for plaintiff; Wise &
Nickeus for defendant-appellant
| Territory Of Hawaii VS.. Poloaiea, ap-
peal from District Court of Honolulu
Achi & Johnson for defendant-appellant !;
Attorney General for appellee.
Henry J. Lyman VS.. Hilo Tribune Pub.
Co: exceptions from Fourth Circuit
! appellant; Wise & Nickeus for defend
ant.
Honolulu Rapid Transit Co.: submits
sion without action. Kinney, Ballou &
McClanahan for plaintiff; Holmes &
Stanley for defendant.
B. L. Marx. administrator, VS.. p. A.
Parmelee: submission without action.
Hatch & Silliman for plaintiff; Kinney,
Ballou & McClanahan for defendant. b q
b. L. Marx, administrator. VS.. Bishop
& Co: submission without action. Hatch
& Silliman for plaintiff; Holmes & Stan
ley for defendant.
Mary A. Cofield VS.. Territory of Ha-
wall: exceptions from First Circuit
Court. Kinney, Ballau & McClanahan
for neutrality-suspicious.; Attorney Cen
eral for appellee.
Hearing was had in the First Circuit
Court yesterday morning in the case OF
Fl. r. Hitchcock VS.. F. Hustace ct al,
for the Introduction of evidence as to
the market value of the Kamalo stock
at the time of its conversion, about
April 1899, and also upon what fee should
be paid to plain iffs attorneys.
The Court stated that he would sign
a decree giving judgment against de-
PENDANTS for the sum of $4,000 and also
for the recovery of 5000 shares of the
stock, and m the event of the failure to
recover said 5000 shares. the value OF
the same at $50 per share, amounting to
$4,000. Compliments counsel was al
lowed fee of $4,000.
The total amount of the Judgment
against the promoters is $4,000.
PROBATE.
Fourteen probate cases are on the cal
endar of the First Circuit Court for to-
day. They are as follows: Estate P.
Kamanawa Kuahu, proof of will; Jas.
G.. Hayselden, annual account: Yatta
Kubey, annual account: Nancy S. Ellis,
final account and discharge: Ona Juko,
final account and discharge, j. r. VII
liams, annual accounts: f. F. Made ra,
probate of will: a. A Doiron. probate
of will: NJ Comes Garrido, notion In
re Legalization of the Adoption of Alika,
an infant by A. KaI ratti and wife. es-
tate Emma Kaleoleoalani. annual ac-
count; estate guardianship Richardson
minors.
Joseph K Clark yesterday made sug-
gestion to the Court that he had pur-
chased all the right. title and interest
of Mrs. K. Lazarus in and under the
last will of Joseph Lazarus. and prayed
that he be entered as beneficiary on
the records. The suggestion was based
upon deed of conveyance, dated July g.
1900, on record. Motion was also filed
by Joseph Clark, moving the Court tina,
an order be made directing George Luz
cas-, clerk of the Court to distribute
to Joseph o. Carter, guardian of the mi
nor children of the deceased. to Mrs.
Adelaide SCnIeI ana 10 the moNant tNell
share of the monies which have been
paid into the court by John s Walker
executor, amounting to s4357s. It ap.
pearing that the shares of the other two
beneficiaries. A. Lazarus and Henry
Smith, guardian of Naomi Lazarus. hat
already been deducted upon a counter
claim of J. S. Walker
The answer of George r. Carter, guar
dian OF the Carter minors. to the petit
ton of NJ. Fl. S. Davis. was filed vest~r'
day, in the First Circuit Court. The an
swer admits all the allegations OF thu
petition for the increase of allowance o
the minors, except two; these two allie
J. cations are to the effect that the presen
e allowance is insufficient and inadequat
o for the proper care and education of sal
minors, owing to their advancing year
and increasing needs, and that It IS nee
:. essary for the proper care. maintenance
and education OF said minors that tn
r monthly allowance of each of them b
}. increased to $500. This the answer OF tn
-l,.~