The Billings gazette. [volume] (Billings, Mont.) 1896-1919, 1900-07-27
hBMi VThh IN Khhv OAsN


W H"helsW W VVilNNH VWW nv AlNlt
supreme Ooml
Tho ,BMIllW from lla supreme oODyl
N llA onHn of Finch o. nj, W. TbOmnl
Ann MNIF Kent hnn lNsI been i|lpd IN
lhA dlHlIlnt 0DnlI OF lhlA bounty Rlnntr
Inv u hpW Htn 10 ubn @defeNlnnIs,
ThOA nDd MalS Kent ANA wypMIOp
ihn Judgment ObIniDed by tllD plAlDUtfa
against ihp deveDdnDts IN snid OnsN,
which WINS Hind IN Yellowstone ouuNty
hafOIe JndHo b0nd, September WON,
lbN7, NpOn which OoonslOD thR judpe
1lvepte1 lh1 jury 10 vetnpD u verdict fOv
tho DlnlAUNh
Wlp Anll wins brought by I'm whDlor
nnla finn " Finch, Vim hlyGI, YOnna
" 0O, NJ NJ pnDl, 10 sNl naiho 4 HAIe Of
n.3OO sheep, Mndh. BY. ThOa Kent 10
Mary kant hlA Wlfp, jan, pupd, laDD,
Oh tba grounds lhRt anld aale WINS
fraudulent nDd weld I'M ~ plAiNtlna, who
olnlMed 20 ba \ creditor OF ThOa Kent
~ TIM tlMn, nplslna upon u a@NAvAulpe
by Kent OF u dObt owed by White NJ
HAvaADa, formerly merchants Nj
Columbus, 10 mid Pinch et nh fOv
goods purchased which lh0y did moi
pny, 10 IhN amount OF $1,000 npOD
whlNh guaranty lhDy, on Fpb lTth,
lbD4, obtained lOdamoDt AgaiDat IhOa,
kent NM brought Wills nOltOD 10 subject
Hhif Hll0eb 10 iha payment 0f mid tudl'
mnnt Al lla conclusion ~ Ihp inAljr
mDny mo Plaintiffs moved tbnl Iudpr
mpnl ba enInp0h IN tbOlv favor fOv tho
vNnaoD thal tha proof sh0wed Tint there
mn D6yel been M nptNnl ~ continued
nbnnHD " pOaaeaal0n VI lhn sheen ADld
fpom Kent 10 hla wife, but thnl 6o was
alill ~ pOsanNHlOn ~ before Tho anle,
IhDnhvlDH Ila AAln DODblpunIlyply rpAnnu
DlpDh m ~ plAintilfs' which molten
wns gvNDled by 1bo oOuit below,
Vha supreme 0Onvt Ia Nv decision
hall lhDL iho 0Onvt erred IN plnnlinp
hAld motion Anted thnt only aQlunl
yvnld bnd Dean wv Dp ID tho NOmplaint
nDn pp0Of ~ constructive fInnh would
nOt correspond with thn allegations,
lln burden w proof being Cd lbe plain
llna w show raolH iDynlIdntlNa Mo aAle,
Thnt lbny cannot pland DolNnl fpAnd
lnd lnn0ynr On proof NJ 0OnalI nGtlv8
lvnnd, NnOh IN WOnld AIisa from TIM
thnh IhplN VIM no continued
on pOHAaHHlOn after thu anI0, md
sNoh u nndjDp by lhe oOnIt wOOld MOI
tnpp0vt u Judgment for Mn plniDtifs
pDNl IN u nvAntIOI'A aDlf 10 aNf AHlhe u
NnlA NJ sheep w fraudulent, bnoNnan
fh0vA WINS 30 continued 0hADHe NJ
|lOAHeHslOD, where only Il nnvl Ol bio
'hoap mmninnd IN Tho pOasoaaiOD W
|hp %pnlobnsv ~ lhn Tins tho creditors
'oopvpd THAR llnD, fnith0p by nttnob'
nam ~ 0lhaIWlHo) Judgment lbAt
'hh purchaser should deliver 10 IhN
tv ths banNnt " TIN creditors,
III pm sheep "pnr0lNaed N NoOODDl fOv
JhNW WlpaedS, WRa A@WI0DeOnAJ simon
IhA %pIvAbnsap WIN liablA Nndm Tin
IlNlNl0, only im Mo ldenliOAI ohNllels
IpmAiDlDu IN hbp pOsapaalOn M Tho
lmA lho OIndji0v'a Hon nttnNhNd md III
ihIA 1AN0 TIN jDdgmoDt nantnst Kent
~ I'M gunvNOty hAylDR bean %prOOnvpd
,ypp nm yenv nflnI Tim mia Of tlle ahapp
" knnt M hla VITA, no linn nilN0hnd
mn Nflap Nv, Kant hnd dippOHDd ~
lAnply Dll NJ sAid Hh0ap Nv exchanged
nom inv OtlNvs nnd ahp gOnId DOf I'm
lold lInblp NJ dNliyN Ovol tbOae which
Inv hHf iiHJ1N1i If iii "pEptHiEHh, iiGf
fW lhe WOoOnda tbevpOf,
WIaln mn OthW AyvOvH pointed out by
l0 Anpvamn 00nIt, lhe OODvl hDIdlDg
" WIN nvvOf IN AKNIDdn the ve0MIa
Y thn Dbl M NalD M mid property Aflnv
~ tho lOW ~ the original md
Kant nnd nm wite should hnyO
'pon permitted VI idAtlfy lhnt lin |
lnnHfnp, VIM NOt mNdn Win tha intens !
~ ~deilnDdlDg plaintiffs, which tbp ,
oDvi hal0w gAfDr0d b0stdNp defendant
IOnld hnyN baND permitted 10 testify ,
bNt w lh6 llma NJ Tin aAla hA did nOt !
W. nlnlnllYH ANYTHING, |
MnsayI DampbalI nUd Stark and v,
J HHfhh0IN Dpponvad Wv th0 ptniDtlfs .
ln0b w NJ, nnI Oh A, LNnG M thta |
IVY INV Lhe dRfaDdnnls WbOh and Mnvy ,
VhlR makes thR AoQOnd Hnit Nv |.
hM Appn0Hdad IROautIy IN win .
INV HM kaDls w I'm supreme :
)UJt, /.