The Owosso times. (Owosso, Mich.) 1897-1926, 1900-10-26
WHAT HEARST BELIEVES.
Plain Talk I'm the New York Journal
When No Election Was
Pending.

Just after the election of 1898 viii.
liam r. Hearst, editor and proprietor
of the New York Journal, the Chicago
American and the San Francisco Ex-
aminer, which are now shouting
against imperialism" favored expan-
sion, which he declared was both right
and reasonable" He denounced the
course of the democratic national lead
ers in opposing it as marrow and
stupid beyond belief" and charged
democratic defeat to democratic lead
ers who, 'having brought on the war,
refused to share the honors or to &C.
quire for the people the lasting bene-
fits of the war;"
These sentiments were uttered in a
signed editorial printed in the New
York Journal of November 10, 1898,
which is here reproduced in full:
The War Is the Issue.
The vote of this election is a vote of
approval for the war and the princi-
pie of expansion and for the greater
conservatism of the republican party.
Local issues, everywhere in favor of
the democrats, have failed to influence
voters to abandon the main issue.
1t is both right and reasonable that
the administration which, despite it's
mistakes, carried this glorious war to a
successful conclusion should receive a
vote of confidence. 1t is both right
and reasonable that the policy of ex-
pansion, ever the policy of the Amer
lean people since Jefferson annexed
the Louisianas, should receive the APP
proval of the American voters, repub-
lican and democratic.
The democratic national leaders have
been narrow and stupid beyond be-
lief, and the Journal and Examiner
have warned them time and again of
the inevitable results of their stupidity.
The democratic press and the demo-
Gratis in congress urged and brought
on the war, but the democratic leaders,
under the control of Bailey, influenced
by petty jealousy, forced the demo-
cratic party into an attitude of oppo-
sition to the very war they had brought
on; forced it further into an attitude
VI OpIOSlblOh ~ bhC uCluoSl otiS POi-
icy of expansion, to the very principles
of Jefferson, the father of American
democracy.
The suicidal attitude of the demo-
cratic, leaders began with opposition to
the annexation of Hawaii. These lead
ers purposed driving democratic con-
gress into caucus to oppose annexation.
The Journal sent it's representative ed
itors to Washington, fought this eau
Gus, broke it up and prevented the
democracy from making a formal and
conspicuous ass of itself on that &C.
casion. But the narrowness of the lead
ers continued and developed tendency
to oppose every republican act, even
though it embodied democratic prin-
ciple.
At the democratic convention at
Syracuse, N. Y, the Journal offered to
and urged upon the gentlemen in con-
troll of the convention plank embody-
ing the Journals national platform and
declaring in favor of the Jeffersonian
principle of expansion. But the demo-
cratic leaders preferred to confine the
fight entirely to local issues, with the
result of democratic gains in districts
Immediately affected by the local is
sues, but of republican victory in the
whole state.
In New York every democratic con-
gresham who declared for the prin-
ciples of the war and the policy of
expansion was elected, and Capt. Will
liam Astor Chanler (democrat), who in
himself represented the principles of
the war, and who declared for the JEFF
fersonian principles of expansion, de-
feated Lemuel Ely Quigg, the repub-
lican leader. in republican district by
over 5000 votes.
The democratic defeat is not due to
the democratic people or to democratic
principles, but to democratic leaders.
They, having brought on the war, re-
fused to share the honors of the war
or to acquire for the people the last
ing benefits of the war. The demo-
eratic leaders do not speak for the
democracy, and republicans have
everywhere elected with the aid of
democratic votes.
w. r. HEARST.
IN. Y. Journal, Nov. 10, 1898.