The Daily Ardmoreite. [volume] (Ardmore, Okla.) 1893-current, 1900-02-11
Still lhOTHtQ ptnTOh EATD
nONTE CRISTO PRAYS The COURT
FOR RELIEF.
Aaks That his Tenants 10 the North PART
Of Ardmore be Not narrassed or Far
ther Interfered with by Receivers
or their Attorneys.

John McNeish, Receiver, VS.. :,
L. P. Adkins, ct al.
Comes now Isreal Ernest Ad-
kins and after leave of the court
had and obtained files this his in
tervention in said cause:
Your petitioner states that ne
is, and has at all times, up to the
29th day of June, 1899, been a
minor and has for the last II
years past been the owner OF that
particular tract of land known in
this controversy as part of the
Adkins claim situated in the town
of Adrmore, Chickasaw nation,
Indian Territory, and described
as definitely as he can describe
it according to the survey now
existing as follows:
Commencing at the crossing
on the railway on ..........
street close to where it runs be
tween the two vineyards known
as the old Louis Will place, in the
town of Ardmore, Indian Terri
tory, and .... street and running
thence west with said street
to Frensley street; thence south
with Frensley street aud Broad
way; thence along Broadway and
along the south line of what has
heretofore been known as the
Adkins property and Woodford
road; thence north to the street
that parallels the north side of
the Frensley residence; thence
east along said street directly
north of said Frensle.; residence;
r thence north along ......
street to point where said street
lntersected what used &C be the
old road leading to thu north of
Ardmore; thence along tho line
of said old road and Dorthefn
limits of Ardmore, surrounding
r and including what is known as
n the Pulliam place and the w. K.
Campbell place; thence down the
line Of the railroad to the place
s of beginning.
: That said land was duly regis
t tered as his individual property
j. and claimed under the laws of the
l. Chickasaw nation long prior tc
It the rendition of the judgment il
d this action, or the mourning o.
the obligations sued on herein
and has, under the Indian laws
n at all times been, and is now
Il his property.
q That he is and at all times has
'e been a member of the Chiclzasav
le tribe of Indians by blood anc
IL was recognized on the rolls as
l. member of said tribe and en-
IS titled to own, hold and posses
lands under the laws and custom:
. of the Chickasaw tribe of In
rs dians.
l. That Notwithstanding his OWE
id ership of said lands and his righ
N to the rents and revenues arising
out of same, and notwlthstand
- ing his title was duly recorded
in accordance with the laws o
~ the ChlckaSaw tribe of Indians
of which he is a citizen, the plain
,e tiffs in this action, after institut
N ing this suit have collected larg'
T. sums of money as rents upol
m said lands, the list of the sumi
10 collected by them, the person'
q. from whom and the amount!
m thereof, being attached hereto
o. made a part hereof and marked
at exhibit "a"
q. That all of said monies belong
to this intervenor and was col
lected and realized from th
ly rents and disposals of his lands
I'll That all quit claim deeds here
III in made by the receiver are ali
ne solutely void for the reason tina
IT, they seek to divest the Indian d
Ut tie to the land and vest same Il
NJ citizens of the United States, a.
II of which is expressly prohibite
VI by the laws of the United State
~ in force in the Indian Territory
JIG that same when sold by an orde
'e' of court could be sold to a men
~ Der of the tribe of Indians.
That with a full constructiv
ne knowledge of all of the said fact
ur the plaintiff herein has. yea
VI after year, collected and appr,
priated rents and revenues be
longing to this lntervenor to hi
Of own use and benefit. Thf