The Wichita daily eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1890-1906, 1900-10-13
Some More About oIeomargarine.

Every enterprise should stand its worth, every
product upon Combines costly to the
consumer the helpless. The
Eagle something offer the other day touching a
creamery combine organized of leg
sating oleomargarne of the poor man,
existence the interest of the owner
cow benefit of the manufacturers
the substitute butter The farmer is as
interested price his he is in the
price her milk The tends to enhance
price milk oleomargarine the price of the
herself of all other fat cattle well as of hogs
the interest of the cattle owner
degree that if butter does not tend to
depress price butter pounds of which is
single of product What we
live stock producer and of
the poor who oIeomargarine, having in
in either any plant
oeomargarine establishment However since writing the
article into the possession Of
letters which only confirm opin
ion fact that back of the GrOut bill is
combine nearly one thousand companies,
of which their union officials have published, to-
gether with the amounts contributed being all the
from SO o $3.50 dollars col
expended by the creamery combine,
make the Grout bill a satisfied
already secretary of this
sending letters creamery
ing what done, and begging for 1t
great big thing. letter Chicago, October
1900 signed by Knight secretary
a southwest Kansas firm and which is pos
session. says eighteen past
eed upwards 10000 that the keeps two
other men travelling tme $3454o4 has been
collected expended up they
$1,000 additional Immediately money to
in securing the passage of the Grout BILL which is in
tended to tax oleomargarine out of existence
PROFESSIONALLY creamery and oleomargarine
capitasc enterprises pure simple
hitting argument both are in the
interest cow-owner one demanding the milk and the
animal interest the consumers
overlooked patrons one being the
hotel boarding house and to some extent the town
home factory and day laborers
either butter or the cream
product, nothing pro-
Queer, whether cattle or hogs or both
Looking the the Eagle can't see
any for stamping oleomargarne in
than the business any argument
why stamped of the other
The the oleomargarine forced to
creamery product simply because he is not able to-
ana so the Wp1ng out Of oleomargarne simply deprves
him altogether. without particularly benefng the cream
but the detrment who has fat cat
tie and hogs to SELL That aboring interested
may be gathered large number of la
Dor Organizations petitions congress protesting
against the passage the Grout bill
good qualities products we do not
believe there any creamery com
CINE claim that the oeomargarine pro-
duct So do the creamery fellows, anyone may
by reading the official Prof Wiley United
States department of agriculture This pubca
ton tells how pound of butter pound of milk
converted into pounds average but
would oIeomargarine such but
wiey's report large of and
business against the interests of
both the farmer and the of
pretense the creamery they are making
this fight the interest Of the fraudulent
They expending dollars alluded to in
the interest Of the National Dairy Union"
SO far the farmer is concerned far as the
concerned without any reference either to
the combine the oeomargarine combine
creamery product plainly stamped creamery
butter and the packing product stamped
garne." leaving each competition produce best
article their respective possible Many people are
ore afraid Of the creamery product packing
house product All prefer gt-edged homemade eoun-
butter, and which is the pures healthy
everything else being equal those who make
selling business they want the highest price
possible of The creamery milk and the highest
price possible packing house for the COW that is
beef-fat