The daily sentinel., 1900-03-30
REASON WITH YOURSELVES.

How many do the people, who have revamped the
old question: they fool the If this
city?
How many times is the old water question to be brought
life again suit the purposes of certain crowd OF men
who want public Office?
there city who want the nasty water
fight again pushed politics. turmoil STRIFE and
endless hard feelings9
not side which has pulled the water question
again into politics. time and again assured the people that the
Dead that in the province of the courts
that the people would more fight over
that old issue againP
again the question brought before the people to
their disgust be made do duty again. to contribute to the
ambition of politician who is known a "has been"
The crowd referred to does not want the water question
settled has wanted settled long they can drag
it into politics.
The issue OF this campaign is good government The
= stable government
The water question was settled until certain
out of the council
The city now owns its own water plant What is
there bring the question again into municipal politics
The voters know have water plant 1t be-
longs city all time that question settled They
also know that the people who pushing water tight into
repeatedly said that the courts is the place
differences with the old water company Under
of argument they ask the people to again
take up fight which has this city to become by
word to the rest of the state?
There only Mr. Voter and that is that the
sgruntlsd crowd desire to be placed in power In
the city They nothing about the water question: only
it may be made to to catch votes
urge upon ysu put and two tsgether and solve
this very plain question fer yourselves 1t s not deep quss
by any of II is simple daylight
from darkness.
With harrangue and argument which they forcefully
utter they would make you believe the city mperd if
the Taxpayers ticket succeeds
Look at the men compose tho adsrmanic ticket and
with yours. whether cannot trust them
think any buldoze David T. CLARK
P. Noand into doing thing which they know to be
against the interests of the city You know that
don't You believe they good men, reliable men, men
with whom you would entrust your every dollar bus
proposition and expect to be fooled msed
Why will you believe who utter things against such
stable
With other candidates the Taxpayers ticket
thing be said e. A. Olsen is of the light
reliable young of the city You would have much
influence him against the best welfare of the city,
you would individually attempt with spade to turn the
of the Grand river in another direction.
w. T. Dowrey the candidate in the first ward is
cessfu business Tho other side does not want Mr.
Dowrey very little bit He cannot be used. No who
the oh side would presume to lead Mr.
Dowrey successfully attend
would fully realize the antcipatons
of the public in council keen of business, honest
a unassailable
Knowing these things Mr. Voter don't lot the other side
bamboozle you against your own better Judgment.
It is high you abash these who want to rule
ruin in this city
You rebuked actions tho polls last April when
you elected Mayor Ella.
Last year this paper made its principal fight for good
the question of sewerage We have the
tenn will and that premise has been redeemed
progress has been made under the administration OF
present city council than before the cys history
Don't stand in the of progress whom at