The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1900-06-08
THE COURT RECORD.
SUPERIOR COURT.

SUPERIOR COURT.
Room John l.. McMaster. Judge.
Nancy Reed, Administrative, VS.. Citizens
Street-railroad Company; damages. On
trial by struck jury.
Room 3-vinson Carter, Judge.
Amos c. Heltzel vs.: the City of Indian
joined from proceeding with Contract.
Judgment against defendants for costs.
Daniel Foley The New Telephone
Company; contract Judgment against de-
PENDANT on special finding and construc-
ton of law for S40s. % and costs.
CIRCUIT COURT.
Henry Clay Allen Judge.
Ida NJ Loeper ct al. vs. Henry A. Kolker
ct al; partition. Commissioner files report
of sale. Approved. Deed rendered and ap-
proved. Commissioner allowed IS as ex-
penses. Commissioner discharged and trust
closed.
In re petition of George Harness ct al /;
for drainage. Writ of attachment ordered
for Paul Julian for contempt for failure to
comply with order of court to make report
herein.
William Baughman ct al VS. Samuel
Baughman ct al: partition. Commissioners
files final report of distribution. Approved.
Commissioner discharged and trust closed.
On motion of Augustine Boice, Parker J.
Boice was admitted to the bar.
Joseph Ross VS. The Globe Model and
Pattern Works ct al; on contract. From
L. ~
dence heard Arguments heard. Taken un-
der advisement.
NEW SUITS FILED.
Edwin ]. Keiren VS.. William II. Robin
son and James II. Law: to foreclose me-
chanic's lien. Superior Court. Room 2.
Alfred w. Mahan VS. Ora M. Mahan d.
vorce. Superior Court, Room /.
Tillman v. Mendenhall VS.. Stacey E.
Mendenhall; divorce. Circuit Court
Edward Schmidt VS.. Simon Schmalholz:
on No 4
Maud M. Scanlon VS.. John Scanlon; d.
vorce. Superior Court Room g.
Clara Knodel VS.. John Knodel: divorce.
Superior Court, Room 2.
SUPREME COURT.
Minutes
1912. Bollman VS.. Gemmill Jaw C. C.
Affirmed. Baker. G. IA Judgment with
out relief" cannot be rightfully rendered
unless the law provides for such a judg-
ment in the particular case. and when the
law does so provide the Judgment must be
entered without relief" or a sale there
under without appraisement will be illegal.
1926. Roach VS.. Clark. Elkhart c. C..
Motion to dismiss postponed to final hear
ing
1881. Shelby County Council VS. State ex
rel. City of Shelbyville. Shelby c. C. Ad-
vanced.
APPELLATE COURT.
Minutes
3141. Cooper VS.. Merchants. etc. Bank.
Clay e. Z. Reversed. COmStOck, il. In
an action upon promissory note 1t Is suf-
ficient to copy the note and the indorse-
ment in the body of the pleading. 2.
Whether or not a promissory note was pur-
chased when delinquent interest was past
due and unpaid is proper evidence upon the
question of good faith In the transaction on
the part of the purchaser. 8. An answer
that a witness had no notice of defense
to a promissory note at the time Ii was
transferred is as statement OF fact T. An
answer by a cashier of bank that the
officers of the bank had no notice OF de-
Tense to a note should have been stricken
out as hearsay evidence. s. When there is
a conflict in the evidence on material points
the court should not direct the jury In the
return of its verdict.
3201. Dodds VS.. Winslow. Grant G. c.
Transferred to Supreme Court.
zoos. Small VS.. Hammes. Huntington c.
c. Transferred to Supreme Court.
1872. Bowman VS.. Citizens etc, Bank
Delaware c. c. Petition for rehearing over
ruled.
1888. Lauer VS.. Schmidt. vanderburg s.
c. Petition for rehearing overruled.
1927. Tarple VS.. Capp. Shelby c. c. Pc
tition for rehearing overruled