The Wichita daily eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1890-1906, 1900-09-01


Thomas. Eleven of these are for viola
ton OF the United States statutes regu-
iating the sale Of liquor. and others are
for counterfeiting. etc The cases are
assigned for trial as follows:
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER Il
G. H Maberly VS.. Kearney county board.
Rossington, Smith & Histed for plaintiff;
NJ @. KaIso. Peters & Nicholson and Nil
ton Brown for defendant
II. C. Spear vs.. Kearney County board.
Fuller & Whitcomb for plaintiff; G. II.
Smith, Peters & Nicholson and Milton
Brown for defendant.
Robinson Female Seminary VS.. L p.
Campbell, et al. Peters & Nicholson for
plaintiff; sankey & Campbell for defend
ants.
Lyman H Atkins VS. Mary ". Car
stairs. ]. V. Daugherty for plaintiff;
David Smyth and T. B. Wall for defend
ants.
E. 3. crizsey vs.. ". H THOMPSON
stebbins & Evans for plaintiff; J. c. FL
lis and VIM. Barrett for defendant.
Society for Savings VS.. Pratt Couny
Board. Herrick & Rogers for plaintiff;
s. S. Ashbaugh and B. D. Crawford for
defendant
Frederick ". Ramsden vs. Cheshire
Provident Institution John A Eaton.
TrirnbIe & Braley and Pollock & Laf
ferty for plaintiff: T 3. Wall. c. q.
Brooks and Frank Hagerman for de-
PENDANT
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER Il
Aetna Life Insurance Company vs.. Cen
ter Township, Ness county. Kansas.
Rosslngton. Smith & Histed for plaintiff;
I. n. Sddger for defendant.
James Wilson vs.. c. P I. & P. Rail-
way company. Adams & Adams for
plaintiff; ". F. Evans and Stanley, Yer
million & Evans for derendant-
Portsmouth Savings Bank VS.. iCty Of
Gueda Springs. Scammon, Meade &
Stubenrauch for plaintiff; Houston &
used for carrying passengers for hire
Brooks and c. A Mitchell for defendant.
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER B.
". E. Caldwell ct al. Us. A T. & 5. F.
Railway company, Ell al Thornton ".
Sargent and Augustus W. Wilson for
plaintiffs; A a Hurd for A T. & S. F.
Railway company and Lathrop, Morrow.
Fox & Moore for Richardson company.
Aetna Life Insurance company vs.. City
Of Engiewood. Bentley & Hatfield for
plaintiff; ]. n Gresham for defendant
s. ". Ashford VS.. Standard OIL COM
pany Blake & Ayres for plaintiff; Stan
ley. verniIion & Evans for defendant
L. vandriss vs KeaFney County Board.
Carver & Larimer for plaintiff; NJ G.
KeIso. Peters & Nicholson, H. F. Mason
and Milton Brown for defendant
". y. Coler 6, Co VS.. Scott Township.
Scott county. Kansas. Bentley & Hat
field for plaintiff; Travis Morse and 5. s.
Ashbaugh for defendant
Charter Oak National Bank VS.. City Of
Ellsworth. Herrick & Rogers FOR plain
tiff; Ira z. Lloyd and c. J. Evans for
defendant
Society for Savings VS.. Seward County
Board Herrick & Rogers for plaintiff;
s s. Ashbaugh and 7. A Scates for de-
PENDANT
P. Frank Clarkin vs.. Solomon Rick
seeker Prigg s Williams for plaintiff;
Martin & Roberts for defendant.
FRIDAY. SEPTEMBER "A.
Emma V. Garst VS.. St Louis & San
Francisco Railway company. Amidon &
Comfy for PLAINTIFF: J. W. Gleed and f.
". Bentley for defendant
United States Bank vs.. City Of Ness
City. Rossington, Smith & Histed for
plaintiff; H. F. Mason for defendants.
c. E. Walker VS.. Western Union Tele-
graph ompany. W. s. Cade and A J.
Titus for plaintiff; Stanley, vermiIion &
Evans for defendant.
Mrs E. L. Leavitt VS.. Western Union
Telegraph ompany. D. 3. Creweon for
g -or
defendant.
Dodge iCty Water and light company
vs. City OF Dodge city. Wollmon, SOLO
mon s. Cooper for plaintiff; Gleed, Ware
& GIeed for defendant; f J. Oyler for
J. ". Gilbert
". y. Coler & CO. VS.. Wichita County
Board Bentley & Hatfield for plaintiff;
J. S. Caldwell for defendant.
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER Is.
Milford Savings Bank VS.. iCty OF wei
lington. Stanley. Vermilion & Evans for
plaintiff: Levi Ferguson, James Law
rene and Ed T. Hackney for defendant
The State of Kansas Us. Dodge City
Water and Light company, ct al Gleed,
Ware & Gleed for plaintiff; WoIIman,
Solomon & Topper for defendants.
10 Johnson vs.. J. P. Baden Pollock &
Lanersy for plaintiff; Madden & Buck
man for defendant.
]. W. Lynch We F. L. Gordon ]. c.
Pollock and = T. Laferty for PLAINTIFF;
\. l. Noble for defendant
The Randall company VS.. City Of Ar
kansas City. Hutchings & Keplinger for
plaintiff; l. C Brown, Pollock & Laf-
ferty and Jackson & Love for defendant
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER IL
Savings and Trust Company VS.. City Of
Dodge iCty. J. T. Herrick for plaintiff
Albert " Chambers vs. Center Town
ship, Ness county. Kansas Hutchings
& KePIinger for plaintiff
Daniel T LougfslIow rs. Coolidge
Township. Hamilton county. Kansas.
Herrfck 6 Rogers for plaintiff; George
Getty for defendant
Charles Davenport vs. City Of Meade
Center Bentley & Hatfield for plaintiff.
National Bank Of Commerce rs. F. P.
O-bisou. It al A l. Noble for plaintiff.
H c. Ha7gfs for Defendants
George P Howard IS. Ki3wa County
Bard Hutchings & Kepsinger for plain
tiff.
Aetna Life Insurance company IS
Hayuasvius Township, Pratt county.
Kansas. Bentley & Hatfield s0- plaintiff
First National Bank % C5b'eskIli y.
=. "a. s. 9. Davis John D NllIiken for
plaintiff. Y. y. whitelaw and J. c.
Foley FOR defendant
G F Furman vs. iCty C. Stafford
Hutchlrgs & KeplEnEsr FOR plaintiff; John
y. Rose and z. L Martin f9T2efendaat
United states Bank vs. School Dtstrict
N e. Pratt County. Kan Bentley &
Hztdela. for plaln.IT: :. @ Thompson To-
defendant
Woousccket INSTITUTION f7r Savings IS