The Kootenai herald. [volume] (Kootenai, Idaho) 1891-1904, 1900-10-12

/
how much of this 1925 is for "ser-
vices as commissioner" and how
much is for Expense" because
there is something very suspicious
about the bills of the fusion COM
missioners. OF late they have each
been drawing exactly 1925 a quar-
ter, when the matter of milage
alone shonld cause a difference in
the figures.
But the above bill is only
sample of many others. We note
the following:
An account dated April "a, 1899, for quar-
terly salary $4,000; mileage, $2.zo; expenses,
SI.s5; total, $ss4.zs, in favor of L. I. Ditto.
more, audited April "a, 1899; signature and
affidavit left blank, and no filing by the clerk.
An account dated April "a 1899, for quarter
ly salary, $4,000; mileage and expenses, $4.5o
total, S254.so, in favor OF A. n. Tucker, was
audited April a. 1900; signature and affidavit
An account dated March a, 1900, for mileage
and per diem, $4,000, in favor of n. g. Sisson,
davt blank; filed April 4, 500.
An account dated March 4, 1899, for mileage
and per diem,. $500, in favor of L. T. Ditto,
affidavit blank; filed April IL, 1909
| An account dated March 4, 1899, for mileage
and per diem, $500, in favor of A. ~ Tucker,
was audited April IL, 1899; signature and afh-
davit blank, and filed April ?, 1900
An account dated May 10, 1899, for expenses
mot itemized), $4,000, in favor Of A. N. Tucker
was allowed April 10, 1899; signature and aft
davit blank, and filed May 10, 1890, but not
signed by the chairman being audited.
mot itemized), So4 90, in favor Of L. +. Ditto
more, was allowed May 8, 300; signature and
affidavit blank, and filed May 8, 800, but not
! signed by the chairman as being audited.
An account dated May 3, 800, for expense:
mot itemizedl $3.50, IN favor OF \. G. SIsson
Tas al hHr May sd 1922 signature and aft
signed by the chairman as being audited.
An account dated October 90 1899. for sal
ized), SIS, in favor OF A. N. Tucker, was aud
tied October 20, 500; signature and affidavit
blank, and no filing by the clerk
An account dated October 90 1900. for salar'
| third quarter, $l25, for expenses (not itemized,
| SIS, in favor OF n. G.. Sisson, was audited Octo
Der 90, 1890; signature and affidavit blank, anC
An account dated October 60 1900, for salar,
third quarter, S12s, and expenses (not itemized)
| $75 in favor of l.. I. Dttemore was audite,
October 20, 1900; signature and affidavit blank
and no filing by the clerk.
An account dated January, %, 1900, "A sal
airy and expenses, S225, in favor n G. Sisson
audited January. a3, 1900; signature and alhua
Wit blank; filed January a. 1000.
An account dated January, %, 1900. ~ sal
airy and expenses, S225, IN favor l.. I. Ditto
more, audited January %, 1900; signature an
affidavit blank; filed January 20, 1900
An account dated January %, 1900 for sal
airy fourth quarter, and expenses Saas, in favo
a. n. Tucker, audited January %, 1900 sigma
ture and affidavit blank; filed January %, 1900
An account dated April ~, 1900, for salar
and expenses first quarter 1900, $27s, in favo
L. I, Dittemore, audited April a. 1000; sigma
ture and affidavit blank, and no filing by tn
An account dated April ~, 1900, for salar
and expenses hrst quarter 1900, S22s, in favo
and aaS bsnf and A 5g IN SoG spasu
An account dated April H., 1900, for salar
end expenses first quarter 1900, $225, in favo
N. e. Sisson, audited April II, 1900; signatur
and affidavit blank; filed April II, 900.
An account dated August 4, 1900, for salar
u days second quarter July term, $S4, in favo
J.. l. Dttemore audited August A. 1000; sic
nature and affidavit blank; filed August d 1000
An account dated July ~, 1900, for service
Son S;ss and expenses Sa2s, in favor
"; Sisson, audited July ~ 1900; signature an
affidavit blank filed July ~, 1900
An account dated July ~, 900, for service
commissioner and expenses, $225, in favor A. n
Tucker, audited July ~, 1900; signature an
afhday E;5, blank ia filed July n, 1900.
oilI in a,, favor G White, for ss34 (nG
the clerk.
A bill in favor. Tucker & Pierce for srOO. SC
allowed January :, 1900, not audited; sgnatur
and affidavit blank. and filed January g. 1000.
The bills of the county commissioners fo
July, 1899, tor which warrants we're drawn i
the sum OF $II3 each, and for January, rSo,
tor which warrants were drawn in favor of 4
y: tucker IN the sum of SI54.7o, and to N.
Sisson and L. T. Dittemore in the sum Z
$3.50 each, cannot be found in the office Z
the clerk OF the board of county commissioner
Here are thousands of dollar
paid out in manner in open viola
ton of the law, ard yet Callahan
Brady q Co. have the gall to stan,
up before the taxpayers of Kootena
: county and declare that not
a charge has yet been made agains
e the Fusion administration reauirin
b. an answer.
q The Fusion leaders have a yer
n small appreciation of the intelli
: gence of the men and women VIII
pay the taxes of Kootenai count
s if they think they can make such
: brazen declaration stick.
e Never in the history of Kootens
1t county has such Incompetence an
If General Mismanagement been ca
l. hibited.