New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1900-06-13
June Term
Litigation.
THE DISTRICT COURT WILL GET BUSY
Ii NEXT WEEK.
The Civil Calendar Made up of Twenty
Cases of More or Less Import.
a1lce and Interest.
Light Criminal Calendar In Sight but Grand
Jury mayDevelop Something Sensational.

! District court conyenes in this CITY
next Tuesday for the regular June term.
There are 20 civil cases on the calendar,
as follows:
Elvina Benham vs.. May Ingraham ct
al; Lind & somsen for plaintiff, L. G.
Davis tor defendant. l.
1gnatz Ambrosch vs.. Herman Geske,
appeal from justice court, Jos. A. Eek
stein for appellant, Einar Hoidale for
respondent.
julia V. Hansing vs.. Arnold Hickel,
W. A. Funk for plaintiff, Geo. T. Olsen
and Somerville s. Olsen fol defendant.
Hans Wallin vs.. Emil Blankenburg
and Charles w. Harmon,, Stewar: &
Glover for plaintiff, George T. Olsen and
Somerville s. Olsen for defendant.
Wolfgang Schmid VS.. G. W. Everett
& Co., Geo. T. Olsen and Somerville g.
Olsen for plaintiff, D. A. Stewart for de-
fendant.
| In the matter of the Estate of Werner
| Boesch, deceased, Minnie Mathews vs..
Francis Boesch, respondent, Somerville
Il Olsen for appellant, G. R. Davis for
respondent. Appeal from probate court.
Jos. A. Eckstein, respondent VS.. Au-
gusta, Dingler, appellant, Jos. s. Eek
stein and Z. II. Davis for respondent,
Somerville & Olsen for appellant. Ap-
peal from justice court
Toscb & ,Remus vs.. Fritz Winkelman,
SomervilIe & Olsen for plaintiff, A.
Fredericson for defendant. N.
The LampeIt Lumber Co. VS.. s. A.
Wheeler ct al, Somerville & Olsen for
plaintiff, L. G. DAVIS and Jos. A. Eek
stein for defendants.
Il. G. Warnke respondent vs.. A. Ben
ham appellant, A. Frederickson for re-
spondent, L. G. Davis for appellant.
Appeal from justice court.
Gunder M. johnson appellant VS.. Pc
ter Thompson respondent, Geo. T. Olssn
for appellant, A. Frederickson for re
spondent. Appeal from justice court.
Crone Bros. respondents vs.. Daniel
Djngler and Mrs. Daniel Dingler appel
lants, Einar Hoidale for respondents,
Jos. A. Eckstein and Somerville e. Olsen
for appellants. Appeal from justice
court.
Jos. J. Gag VS.. J. T. Lilly. Andrews
& Beise fol- plaintiff, Ed. II. Huebner
for defendant.
Thomas Brophy respondent VS.. A. W.
Cobb appellant, George T. Olsen for re-
spondent, A. Frederickson for appellant.
Appeal from justice court
+. Nagel & Co. vs.. Julius Frank, Jos.
A. Eckstein for plaintiffs, Somerville g.
Olsen for defendant.
| VIM. E. Dittbenner appellant vs.. Town
of Eden respondent, Soperville & Olsen
for appellant, L. G.. Davis for respond
ent Appeal from justice court.
Louisa Beltz appellant VS.. Town of
Eden respondent, Somerville & Olsen
for appellant, L.G. Davis for respondent.
Appeal from justice court.
| J. S. Kilbride respondent vs. A. Hen
Dingsen appellant, Einar Hoidae for ,e-
spondent, Somerville s. Olsen for appel
liant. Appeal from justice court.
Peter Geschwind appellant VS.. The
Board of County Commissioners of
Brown County respondents, L. G. Davis
Tor appellant, George r. Olsen for re-
spondents. Appeal from order Of county
commissioners disallowing claim. 81. -
Hallwood Cash Register Co. VS.. B. Fl.
Larrabee, Einar Hoidale for plaintiff,
Somerville & Olsen for defendant.
The criminal calendar has but one
case, that of the State VS.. VIM Buggert,
which has been in court several terms.
81 g. szs -.
st. Peter Herald The farmers Of
Bernadotte have started a movement for
cooperative store to be opened at
Bernadotte and to be,run in conjunction
with the. post-office. Mr.. Gustafson.
who has operated a store there, has re.
signed as postmaster and intends to go
out of business, and the farmers of that
vicinity intend to succeed him with
co-operatiye store. The capital stock.
Of the store is to be $4, 900 and one, half
of the territory was canvased in. two
days and forty shares at $50 each were
disposed o.. This raises $4,000 which
is one-half of the amount. The balance
will be raised with very little effort
ssass Gs s5als