The times. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1890-1903, 1900-11-15
MISS MoRcAS.s NuPr1ALs.

hiSS
Arrangements Tor the wedd ng OF Mss
Louisa Pterpont Morgan. aausnsar OF
Nlr. J. Pierpcut Morgan. To Mr. Herbert
Livingston Satteriee have all been COM
pleted. and the affair VII be one OF the
mos; brilliant of the year. The ceremony
VII take place tomorrow afternoon AZ
half past O'Clock. al q. Georges Church,
Stuyvesant Square Fully httsen nun-
dred invitations nave been sent out Tbs
recsnt;on IS to follow at the home Of the
brides parents, No. 20 Madison Avenue.
and great preparations haTo been made
for the entertainment Of the guests.
Mr.. Morgan has had an >eNtens' on oult
to his house. in whicE, the wedding hafier
will be served by Sherry This extension
is about seventy-five by ti1ty feet. ana is
two stores in height. The Interior Is COW
cred witt, white bunting that viii make
an excellent background for elegant
floral lecorati tons. The. buffet w.ll also
! &c served from the dtning-room OF the
nanston-
Mss Morgan has chosen for her brides
maids her sister. Mss Anne Tracy Nor
gan; hsr cousins. Mss Carol ne .aoFs.il
and Miss Ursula Morgan: Ms Marion
satterlae, sister OF the nridesroora-e.ece:
Miss May Sturses and MISS Frances Street
! Ho,nin another cousin Thsr costumes
viii is superb. They will consist o.
white b-oche crere de cnsne.. combined
With red panue velvet. 7rofusei5 TT mined
i with lace. The corsases VII Ok s
finished WITH Marie Antoins.,e .tehuS IN ~
!, white ci1iffon. big red valvst mats WI
! bs worn. and all will carry bouquets of
The brides gown Is said to De one Of tna
| most gorgeous ever brought from faE
! 1t is OF heavy white sa-srl with run coutI
J train. almost entirely covered WIZ r
ala noInt .ecA. rer rsr' e ~ IA c. tulis-
: P0IC1
Sly cents damages either for the dcatn o.
. citizen or for Injuries OF any character.
wi,sre generally looked upon as entirely
:naf,eouata and rather ridiculous. have re-
nas,sdly been rendered by juries in tas
. trial Of accident cases. The Judges 0, tas
/ Supreme Court have. however recaatiS
| established precedent TO the eject tna'
f, verdicts OF this character are shock %
.ha senses ard should rot be allowed TO
st4rd not only bscause OF the iusufactsncT
OF. such a verdict, but also for the reason
that there Is TO justice ~ II. If It De es-
F. tabGished that there Is any liability at all
Wher, a Jury announced IN THE supreme
f-d,,rt bssors Judge o'Gornan yesss rday
that they favored verdict for six cents
! da~sras in favor OF James F. Mc2uaoss
in MS SUIT to recover $1,000 against thu
| Third Avenue Railroad Company Tor per-
soaaI daragss. the judge Looked at them
II. establishment
He said u Gn Ect aiSsN ii-s aSE-sS " Jos-
ice. and promptly set Il aside Hs could
rot understand how sueh va-d.cs cor1d
be rendered. declaring that I. tins railroad
company was liable at al. damages Should
have nsea given 20 Mr. rAicGuais- Tl.ra-
ing 70 the jury he then said:
"Gsnt,em4n Of the jury vii! have TO
| order his verdict set aside yau have
found by your verdict that che plaintiff
was Injured by the negligence OF the &C.
;andant company, and having SO found
your rdic, OF six cents IS entirely made
quate 1.-THE plaintiff was entitled TO a
verd ct a I ali, he vas entitled 20 suhstan-
ttaI verdict