The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1900-10-21
GARVEY'S WIDOWS FIGHT.
SHE WOULD FORFiH SSO.0O0 ron
LIBERTY TO MARRl AGiIN.

About $50 900 Coming 10 Her Under thu
Tweed RlnE Frcscoer'' VIII. hut she Pc
fer, 500 900 ~ wrr an U"r Freedom
One Phase oil a T~hree-Cofnrred Litigation.
The suit Of Helena Blanche Garyey. widow
Of Androw Jenries Garye', the Tweed ing
fresroer, 70 recover dover IN hi, c.tni" instead
OF the pro,ision made tor her IN the viii, has
been set for tidal Tomorrow ~ order OF Justice
Bischon NJ the supreme Court. In bringing
the suit Mrs. Gnrvey %iorfeits about $4,000 Tor
the privilege Of marrying again. Under the
will she was to get ~:l3,7joa ycarin lieu Of dover
while she remained Il widow. I aIcnlated from
the time OF the death o;Garycy whom sho was
about IS Years old. the income according Ia the
Northampton lie tables would be worth about
~,lSO,OOO. The appraised yuiue OF the reolty.
Of which the estate almost entirely consists,
Is about half a million dollars. Counsel value
the dow or at about 100000.
Under tho terms Of a proposed compromise
Of the dllerel Il litigat.ons over the estate,
which was pending with various hitci.e- for
about n year, she was TO get two parcels Of
realty appraised at Sliu,WD FOR her dover.
The trial Of the dove a"uon. vii Gum Iate
one Of the three corners In Which tie utigatiu.
over tho estate Is shaped, ard may open up tire
channel Of compromise among tIs other h-
terested parties, which has Idtt'ri. run nf1oag
snags. Aside from the pruti.ion for O." widow
most OF the rest OF the estate was 10 I 10 IN
stitltiCUs Of this city, inClutlug hos, lldIs, the
Masonic order and the New YORK Press tlUD.
About a d zen alleged hours ~ Jlryey have
another action peudlHs, which Il now before
the Court Of Appeal. IN which they seek Ia SGT
aside the will so far as Il leaves more than hati
of his estate to charitable it-t.tutIOHs, under
tho law Of 1850 which provides that a test0tOr
having a widow cannot bepueoih more than
half Of his estate to ChIgltdoi" b. solutions.
The other corner Of the ugu' Is Upheld by the
ben 1Ciarics u der tlC VII.
Some OF the defendants In the fre-ent dover
action have set ~ re d.. O Ce thar NJ. t1TNoF
l. not entiteI t. dover because ui au Huto.
nlytill agreement b. WNiyI she re- lnpui,iei
all C aims on the e-tlte for a consideration Of
$500. She Cuutc. : I Al carve, aurI-atel
tie Agreement W e. I.lny tIe provision Tor an
income Of $3.50 for her Ia his vii and trat nj
though she rejects tie vii provision such aDru-
CATION opens up her right % dover.
An Important feature nl 10" dover a'flon
are the answer n the dozen ulCECi a"T~ Wtu
a.. for Affirmative rolIef AKA ~ their lO-de-
Icndants, the De0elul8r.e' uui". 'e VAL,
10 tho effect that tHe will Il in'a.t 2 To- hall &C
the estate. Ia" ak the court ~ uJ-, u."u
the anne Que.ttOn IN tIe dover acton WHICH
are now being litigated il the action tIer have
bonding in tho Court 81 Appeals. Th"r here
'oin IN the clL.. Of f'e ul.lu f. ~a'in R sho T.,
entitled TO dover. and a,E the court while
awarding dover o. -et a de t.n.r portion u
the estate on finding tIat the wll j. cpr.rtr,
to the law u .s6J. TIE heueh"itrir. will ollie
pose the effort Of the alleged Hcir-t To- nave their
claims "a cd upon IN the g. wcT at. m IN 'N"
ground tlat they seek 70 rA c an s7le foreign
To tho ga.p.