Mexico weekly ledger., 1900-05-24
COURT DOCKET.
June T~srm-isOO.

z Thomas & Hayden VS.. Medley &
Morgan.
SECOND DAY-TuEsDAY, JUNE s.
8 August Boeger VS.. George N
Johnson.
WA Edmonston vs.. Thos Helm
ct al.
10 w A Edmonston VS.. Alex Garter,
Jr., ct al.
IL Sames N Berry vs. Ashury & Carr.
IL State ex rel 0 Cardwell VS.. VIII
liam Stuart.
II II Larimore, assignee E II Gar
ter & 90.
THIRD DAY-wEDNEsDAY, JUNE 5.
IA City of Mexico, respondent, VS..
Julia Cook, appellant.
Is Gather Berrey vs.. Jacob Stumpf.
l6 Laura e Stumpf VS.. M N Nelson
ct al.
II Mrs 8 A Hulen We. R J Muir ct al
IS A SJohnson, respondent, VS.. 8 A
Hulen, appellant.
10 A Larimore VS.. T r Dowell.
FOURTH DAY-THURsDAY, JUNE z.
20 j W Edwards VS.. Chicago g. Alton
90.
21 James Lewis VS.. A ] Lewis.
% Frank A Seymour ct al, receivers,
vs.. W K Potts ct al.
20 w ] Bolts We. ] A Ringo.
"a O @ Voorhies, to use w Morris,
VS.. A J Winscott.
25 Thos Chowning vs., j A Ringo.
20 r L Mcdonald 81 90 VS.. ] @ Har-
ley ct al.
FIFTH DAY-FRIDAY, JUNE 8.
81 A Fountain VS.. Chicago & Alton
Railroad 90.
IS Downing & Dean, executors, VS.,
Fannie 8 Spratt ct al.
% State ex rel 7 ] Asher VS.. II L
Barker ct al.
80 Mamie s spratt VS.. Assenia Law
son ct al.
81 Chas Cole VS.. Florence Cole.
SO A Jacobitz VS.. Fl A Grier ct al.
SIXTH DAY-sATURDAY, JUNE 8.
SO Myrtle Rutherford Va. w e Ruth
erford.
"a ] w Miller We. L p Origler.
35 ] ID Worley vs. L P Origler.
SO ] q Wilkins, assignee, M Blum q
81 Rsbecca E Wise VS.. The lows
State Travelling Mems Associa'
ton.
Ss p Duffy ct 81, resp, We. W !
CAN'T OF al, apps.
SEVENTH DAY-MoNDAY, JUNE IL.
80 Thos Harrison, Sr., We. Lakenan Z
Barnes.
40 A Mudd, No 1, VS.. Mary E stur'
geon ct al.
al State Ok rel Stewart, No /, rs. 8 {
Palmer OF al.
~ State ex rel Stewart, No 2, VS.. s
Palmer ct al.
4s state OK rel Stewart, No 8, VS.. 9 {
Palmer ct al.
A State ex rel Stewart, NO 4, vs.. 3 I
Palmer ct al.
EIGHTH DAY-TUEsDAY, JUNE IL.
40 State ex rel Mayer, No l, vs.. 8 I
Palmer ct al.
4s State ex rel Mayer, No 2, VS.. 8
Palmer ct al.
AZ State ex rel Mayer, No 8, We. 8 I
ePalmer ct oil.
4S State ex rel Mayer, No 4, VS.. 8 I
Palmer ct al.
40 M A Money, respondent, VS.. OFT.
Of Laddonia, appellant.
SO M A McVey vs.. III L. Barker ct a.
NINTH DAY-wEDNEsDAY, JUNE IL.
81 John Mitchell, by next friend, VI
Wabash r r 90.
50 Sharpe Bros VS.. JW Sturgeon 6
al.
So JBick, appellant, vs.. Joseph Kelly
respondent.
54 Viannah Wright VS., w H Wright
So Carrie e Griswold vs.. I'D Girls
void.
So John Page vs. Sarah Page.
TENTH DAY-THURsDAY, JUNE Ia.
81 Ethel Lynch vs.. Hans LRwther.
IS Phoebe Morris va. Elmer johnson
SO j Alexander VS.. / N Regain.
90 Grace Beagles VS.. Frank Beagle
ct al,
81 Maggie e Freeman VS.. the IN
known heirs of John O Burk.
ELEVENTH DAY-FRIDAY, JUNE 10.
So Downing & Dean, executors, VS..
T Nichols.
eS Frank Coatsworth VS.. t. Gibson
GA James Braden VS.. ] w Stephens
65 Theodore Horn, Jr., Va. Waite
Horn ct al.
| GO Thos ] MePike vs.. IN and L
Regain.
81 T Kelso vs. 7 ] Hoxsey.
TWELFTH DAY-sATURDAY, JUNE 10
66 John Davis, respondent, VS.. w
Freeman, appellant.
SO ] @ Prather g. 90 vs.. Thomi
Richards.
20 Bette jenkins VS.. Arch Jenkins.
II Winnie Boyd VS.. James M Boyd.
70 Sallie Kiser We. John Kiser.
70 w II Triplett vs. Bette Sims.
THIRTEENTH DAY-MoNDAY, JUNE 1
IA Samuel B Davis ct al VS.. NJ r d.
Wis OF al.
rs Leo 7 Bell VS.. Missouri Town MI
tual Insurance 90.
rs 2 Hammer Paint 90. vs.. BucE
ner & Whitney.
n. w. II. French ct al vs. Willal
Potts ct al
rs w Million, respondent, va. A
Guerne, appellant
10 Matte G.. Burton VS.. Viola Lyt
ct al
FoURTEENTH DAx-TUEsDAY, JUNE
so Lucy V Hern We. the city
Moberly
81 ia Mcintyre trustee of Georl
McEldewry
50 Alice Maefarlane exeeutrix Of
B Macfarlane
SO O e McVey VS.. w NJ Bressler
81 Fidelity and Deposit 90 of Mar,
land VS.. Colvin & Jackson.
So Geo Willingham VS.. Ed WillinI
ham
Sc Thos M Ward VS., R W Bourn
FIFTEENTH DAY-wEDNEsDAY JUNE
81 e F Haycroft by next friend,
Dolly Griggsby ct al
IS John T. Nunnally VS.. Injunction
William McDannald,
SO John 7 Nunnally VS.. (eieetmen
:. William McDannald.
90 Mary A Reid VS.. the city
Mexico
81 W r Reid VS.. the city of Mexic
90 Ringo and Glandon Va. John
! Baker
) SIXTEENTH DAY-THURsDAY, JUNE
ss Mary B Beagles VS.. James
;, Beagles.
"a e L Gregory, respondent, We. J
Beagles ct al, appellant.
95 Ira Spratt, respondent, VS.. esta
A Spratt, deceased, appellant
& dU u W VCisJn w. 0AfstA ~ Aehay
a 81 Bank Morgan 90 VS.. A 8 Smith
9s Mary E Hollis We. Leander Holi
SEVENTEENTH DAY-FRDAY, JUNE
: 90 John 7 finder VS.. the Gfeenwi
Ins 90
100 O O Gentry ct al VS.. the Gree
N witch Ins %
101 AN Hellman VS.. Writ L Keene
l02 State ex rel F Mercurio vs.. r
Muir ct al
D 103 W J Long VS. T f German, F &
Bank, of Centralia, ct al.
104 NJ ii Kemp We. the city of Mexi
EIGHTEENTH DAY-sATURDAY JUNE
I los Frank Coatsworth VS.. the Mutt
I'll Life Inns Co of Kentucky
I06 Mamie 8 MoPike vs.. Mol
Banks ct al.
: 107 ] b Armstrong vs.. John Harris
!. -@@ MIL IL