The leader., 1900-10-31

NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS..
No. 1853. Jud Nice. Peevey VS.. Key
stone Lumber Co.-Damage.
No. S62. J. B. Hardy VS.. Cumberland
t. d T. Co.-Damage.
No. 1853. Thomas Ballard VS.. f. H.
Hartman-Damage.
No. 1854. Isaac Bailey VS.. F. H. Hart
man-Damage.
No. 867. J. L. Moyse & Bro vs.. J. A.
& e. l.. Williams-Appeal.
No. 800. c. l.. Siebels VS.. John Hen
ry Pinkney- Ejectment.
No. S96. Celia Bell Davis VS.. More
ton & Helm Lumber Co.-Damage.
No. 500. Lizzie Thompson VS.. l. C.
r. R. Co.-Damage.
No. 902. F. H. Hartman vs. r. r. APP
plewhite, sheriff and tax collector
Replevin.
No. 905. Andrew Mikas VS.. Cumber-
land 7. & T. Co.-Damage.
No. 90S. F. H. Hartman VS.. Mrs. Lu-
la McDaniel-Appeal.
No. oil. F. S. Swain VS.. l. G. n. r.
Co. ct al-Damage.
No. 912. z. r. Clay VS.. Keystone
Lumber Co-Damage.
No. 913 r. II. Scherck, guardian, VS..
Cumberland T. & T. Co.-Damage.
No. 914. James Smith VS.. Moreton d
Helm Lumber Co.-Damage.
No. 916. Mrs. M. H. Hanley ct al VS..
Mary Harper-Appeal.
No. 918. State use, ETC., Annie Pax
ton VS.. Ambrose Tillman- Bastardy.
No. 9l9. Union Casualty Co. VS.. B.
E. Brister Il Co.-Debt,
No. 900 Mrs. M. l.. Smith VS.. l. c.
r. R. Co.-Damage.
No. 924. Womack & Decel vs. l. c.
r. r. Co.-Damage.
No. 928. Luther Anding VS.. l. G. R.
R. Co.-Appeal..
No. 1853. J. H. Menge & Son VS.. f. Fl.
Hartman-Debt.
No. 966. E. E. Shaw VS.. Daniel &
Zwirn-Appeal.
No. 967. Union Casualty Co. VS.. East
Union Mills-Appeal.
No. 500. DR.. ]. W. Bennett VS.. j. j..
Sasser-Debt.
No. $40. Mcintosh Wright Millinery
Co. VS.. II. & e. Hubener-Debt.
No. 973. Geo. A. Love vs.. Mrs. Jen-
ME ID. Chrisman-Appeal
No. 979. Fl. P. lotteries VS.. Mrs. M.
j. Copman Appeal.
No. 9S1. Daniel & Zwirn VS.. j. H.
Willoughby-Debt.
No. 9S2. Slayden Kirk sey Wooden
Mills VS.. F. H. Hartman-Debt.
No. 9S4. Cynthia Gutlin VS.. Clara
Thompson Appeal.
No. 9S5. f. H. Hartman VS.. Lincoln
County-Appeal.
No. 9S6. Hartman Lumber Co. vs.
Lincoln County-Appeal.
No. 9S7 Commercial Bank VS.. F. III.
Hartman Appeal.
No. 900. Ida Jones VS.. |. G. r. r. Co.
Appeal.
No. 991. Mrs. Lizzie Wilson vs.
Western Union Tel. Co.-Appeal.
CIVIL CAsEs--APPEARANCE DOCKET.
No. 964. HI. Cass edy, Jr., VS.. Cumber
land T. & T. Co.-Damage.
No. 965. NJ L. Bradham VS.. Farmers
Mutual Fire ms. Association Debt.
No. 96S. T. w. Smith VS.. Southern
| Mutual Fire Ins. Association Debt.
I No. 974. Eliza o. Calcote VS.. F. H.
Hartman-Damage.
No. 975. Mrs. Tillie Ann Womack VS..
Natchez, Columbia & M. r. r., and
Norwood d Butterfield Co.-Damage.
No. 976. Same as above.
No. 977. j. A. j. Summers VS.. N. G.
& M. R. R. and Norwood Butterfield
Co-Damage.
No. 983. Brookhaven Ice Mfg. Co.
VS.. Canton Ice Co.-Damage.
No. 9SS. Mrs. M. L. Dixon VS.. Cum
berland 7. a. T. Co.-Damage.
No. $50. Harry Fielder VS.. Norwood
& Butterfield Co.-Damage.
CRIMINAL DOCKET.
No. 537. State VS.. Lucius Sanders
Retailing.
No. 1873. State VS.. Ed Chamberlain
Gaming.
/ No. 1872. State VS.. John Ruthland-
A. and B. with intent.
No. 1856. State VS.. Robert Carter-Ap-
peal.
No. 1877. State VS.. Thomas Boutwell,
IA. and B. with intent, etc.
No. 7s9. State VS.. Thomas Norton
Concealed weapons.
No. 1888. State VS.. John Quinn-Ex-
hibiting pistol.
No. 1856. State VS.. Richmond Boyd
Grand larceny.
/ No. 1856. State VS.. John Quinn-Con-
cealed weapons.
No. 936. State vs.. Neal Thompson
Murder.
No. 93s. State VS.. Louis Dunn A.
and B.
i No. 947. State VS.. Henry Williams
/ c. w.
i No. s52. State VS.. Albert Lotion
Railing.
/ No. 953. State VS.. Tom Lambright--
Rafting.
j No. 954 State VS.. Jesse Willis and
i Laura Webb-Adultery.
/ No. 955. State VS.. VIII Lewis Raj
fiing.
4 No. $50. State vs.. John Sasser Re-