The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1900-06-21
GARRETT COUNTY COURT

CRIMINAL APPEARANCES.
No. 40. State vs.. Walter Fazen-
baker and George Burkholder; lar
ceny; jury trial; guilty; Thayer-Ren-
ninger.
CIVIL APPEALS.
No. 2. Bernard E. Williams VS.. P.
S. Fazenbaker; settled.
No. 8. Frank P. Straion VS.. Frank
lin Cation; continued; Thayer---.
No 4. Joseph G. Shaw VS.. J. S.
Broadwater; motion for new trial; ar
gued and held sub curia.
No. 5. Robert Bowser VS.. Joseph
Patton; continued; Hamill---.
No. 7. E. Butler Carpenter, VS..
Cora V. Savage; settled.
No. 8, Baer Grocery Company VS..
same; settled.
No. II. Jemima Mowery VS.. McCor-
mick Harvesting Machine Co.; con-
tinued; Sincell-Hamill.
TRIALS.
No. /. Mary c. Merryman VS.. The
Cumberland Paper Co.; continued;
Hamill-Wilson & Sincell.
8. g. S. Hamill, attorney, VS.. Free
man L. Friend; continues; Hamill,
Williams & Semmes - Sincell &
Thayer.
4. The E. J. Fredlock Mfg & Build
ing Co. VS.. j. w. Williams; continued;
Morrison-Hamill.
10. J. N. Ringer & Son VS.. James
A. Delawder; settled; Sincell-Hamill.
10. Elizabeth F. Cecil VS.. Solomon
Hoge; continued; Daily, Speelman &
Williams-Hamill & Semmes.
II. Alice Brison ct. al. VS.. r. A.
Orcutt & Co.; continued; Thayer &
Sincell-Mitchell.
IS. Benz. F. Miller VS.. Vim. Ryland
Co.; continued Renninger-Hamill.
10. Peter P. Lohr, assignee, VS..
Josiah Bittinger & Joseph Bucket;
stet; Sincell-Hamill.
20. A. NJ. Cunningham VS.. S. 7.
Davis, continued.
25. Benz. F. Crane, lessee, VS.. Eliz.
F. Cecil; continued; Hamill & Sem
mes-Daily & Williams.
81. Eliz. F. Cecil VS.. Ebert j. Rex
road; continued; Williams & Daily
Hamill.
%. Alden c. Duckworth VS.. George
L. Michaels; dismissed; Doub & Nor
rison-Hamill & Semmes.
30. James S. Broadwater VS.. Gilead
Broadwater; continued: Hamill-Rey-
holds.
81. Brison Welch VS.. Benz. F.
Crane; continued; Speelman &
Semmes-Renninger.
80. State use Thayer VS.. Shartzer
ct al; continued.
80 to As, inclusive, Mary o. Naylor
ct al VS.. the Peoples Building Loan
and Savings Association of Syracuse,
N. Y; settled on terms filed. &,
Y. R. D. johnson Milling Co. VS..
Cora V. Savage; continued.
SOs I1colcI n. IdlllZ vs.. OeO. 1ulu-
bertson, trespass; warrant remanded
to surveyor for correction and case
continued.
"a, Weimer and wife VS.. Broad
water and Warwick; continued.
4S. Broadwater and Warwick VS..
Weimer and wife; continued
III. Harmon W. Hessen VS.. Mayor
and Council of Oakland; continued;
Sincell-Hamill.
40. Jacob Gnagey VS.. John Beachy;
continued; eddicord-Hamill.
60. Benz. F. Bittinger ct al. VS..
David T. Enlow; continued; Peddi-
cord-Thayer.
81. Ramp & Renninger, trustees,
VS.. Clark & McCulloh; continued:
Renninger-Hamill, Gordon.
GA. State use Holt VS.. W. G. Myers
ct al; stet; eddicord-Gonder.
rs. John Y. Gossler VS.. George 7.
Brew; stet.; eddicord-Hamill
70. Powell & Hyde VS.. George T.
Brew; stet.; Peddicord-Hamill.
so. Jacob Rupert VS.. James B.
Albert ct al; record from Washington
county; stet.; Lane q Keafhofer-M.
L. Keedy.
There remain for trial on the docket
thirty-six cases-the only one of any
special interest being that of Emma
E. McClosky VS.. Gustavus A. Shirer,
for breach of promise to marry.
Judge Stake came up from Hagers-
town on Tuesday afternoon and
appeared on the bench Wednesday
morning and will probably remain
here until court adjourns.
The case of the State VS.. Washing
ton Taylor, of Friendsville, who was
charged with having criminally as
saulted Mrs. E. M. Coddington, was
disposed of yesterday, after having
been before the court all day Tues
day, the jury bringing in verdict of