The Republican., 1900-09-13
The September Court.

Court for Garrett county was COM
menced on Monday morning, with
Hon. A. Hunter Boyd, Chief Judge,
on the bench. Daniel E. Offutt, pres
ident of the Garrett County Bank,
was appointed foreman of the grand
jury.
Monday was taken up in calling
over the sever j dockets and entering
judgments in uncontested cases.
Attorneys r. r. Henderson, John
G. Wilson, r. t. Semmes, Ferdinand
Williams, of Cumberland, and Taylor
Morrison, of Piedmont, W. Va, were
| attending Court.
On Tuesday morning the trial of
cases was begun and up to the time
of going to press the following have
been disposed of and the following
entries have been made in other
cases.
APPEAL DOCKET.
No. 1. T. A. Nethkin VS.. John Shart-
zer; continued; Hamill-Peddicord
No. 2. E. Meyer ct al VS.. S. Murphy;
continued; Peddicord-Hamill.
| No. 3. William Morrow VS.. G. T.
Michaels; Judgment in favor of ap-
pellee affirmed; Renninger-Morrison,
Peddicord.
No. 4. Bear Creek Lumber Co. vs.
Henry Platter; judgment reversed
and claim of appellee paid and salts
fled by the Meadow Mountain Com
pany; Hamill-Peddicord.
No. 5. J. Mowery VS.. Mccormick
Harvesting Co.; Judgment affirmed;
Speelman-Hamill.
No. 8. A. M. Frazee VS.. S. p. Specht;
continued; Semmes-Hamill.
No. z. David McMinn VS.. p. p Lohr;
appeal dismissed; Speelman-Thayer.
No. s. H. N. Fredlock VS.. John
Barnes; tried before the court; judg-
ment sustained; Renninger-Hamill.
| No. 9. j. l.. Roadamour vs.. w. Fl.
Thomas; no appearance; judgment re-
versed.
No. 10. +. g. Hyde and wife VS..
Browning Bros; judgment reversed;
Peddicord; no appearance for APPELLEE.
| No. II. James Andrews VS.. Andrew
| Shartzer; defendant non est; contin-
ued; Peddicord; no appearance for
defendant.
No. 12. J. M. Holderbaum VS.. Rufus
Weimer; appeal dismissed by order
of appellants attorney; Sincell-Ped-
dicord.
No. IS. b. H. Sincell vs. Mayor and
| Cnu rail IF 10 Ill nd. friad EnPopa ha
court and judgment reversed; Sin
cell-Hamill.
No. IA. f. P. Strawn VS.. F. Cation
ct al; dismissed; Thayer.
No. Is. r. Bowser vs.. Jos. Patton;
| defendant non est; continued; Hamill
-Peddicord.
No. 16. Herring & Son VS.. G.. v.
| Savedge; tried before the court and
| Judgment affirmed: Hamill-Sincell.
No. II. Baer Sons Grocery Co. VS..
| G. V. Savedge; continued; Hamill-
| Sincell.
No. 1S. J. Mowery VS.. Mccormick
Harvesting Machine Co; Judgment
affirmed; Hamill-Sincell.
No. 10. Bernard Steiding VS.. W. G..
| Wagner; tried before the court and
| Judgment reversed; Peddicord-Ren-
| ninger.
! TRIAL DOCKET.
No. /. John Shartzer receiver VS..
j. A. Rinker; continued; Sincell.
No. 2. G. w. Gish, vs.. l.. Hochman
ct al; continued; Hamill-Peddicord.
| No. 3. W. H. Michaels VS.. J. o.
Robson; continued; Renninger-Ped-
| dicord.
| No. 4. H. II. Chapman VS.. Reynolds
Heirs; continued; Thayer and Sincell,
-Peddicord.
| No. ). J. III. Gordon VS.. Reynolds
Heirs; continued; Thayer and Sincell
-Peddicord.
No. 6. J. Il. Osborn vs.. +. Liven-
good; continued; Sincell. Thayer,
Cook, Peddicord-Hamill, Mitchell,
Semmes.
No. Z. Conrad Nav VS.. ii. Rhoges
and Henry Strawser; tried before the
court and verdict for the plaintiff;
Hamill and Semmes-Peddicord.
No. 8. State VS.. c. & 0. r. r.; con
! tinued; Hamill-Richmond.
No. 9. T. J. Peddicord Trustee VS..
w. A. kimmell; continued; Peddicord.
No. 10. w. w. Rulifson VS.. w. A.
Liller; Stet; Peddicord Morrison.
No. II. State use Baer Sons Grocery
Co. VS.. John Shartzer ct al. judg-
ment for plaintiff; Hanill-Peddi-
cord.
| No. Il. State use Crawford Bros. VS..
John Shartzer ct al; Judgment for
the plaintiff; Hamill-Pedicord.
No. -. State use Montz & Co. VS..
John Shartzer ct al: Judgment for
the plaintiff; Hamill-Peddicord
No. IA. Jos. Holt VS.. NJ. Lowder-
milk ct al; trial; Peddicord- -Hamill.
No. 10. State use Snyder, Harris
and Basset VS.. John Shartzer ct al.
judgment for plaintiff; Hamill-Sin-
| cell.
No. Is. w. N Myers VS.. J. Taylor
ct al. continued; Peddicord-Hamill.
No. II. State use l.. Goldsmith VS..
John Shartzer ct al; judgment for
| plaintiff; Hamill-Sincell.
No. IS. j. M. Lowdermilk VS.. Jos.
Holt; trial; Hamill-Peddicord
No. 10. J. s. Browning VS.. County
Commissioners; trial; Hamill-Sincell.
No. 90. George Geissman VS.. X. A.
.