The Kootenai herald. [volume] (Kootenai, Idaho) 1891-1904, 1900-10-12
SHIP SUBSIDY BILL.
MEASURE HAS BADLY DlSCON-
CERTED THE DEMOCRATS.
In Attem pting to Make Party Capital
Out of the Shipping Bill they Show
Themselves to Be About Evenly Di-
vided For and Against 1t.

vided For and Against 1t.
The Democratic leaders In Congress
have been making elaborate prepare
tons to make the shipping bill a cam
paign issue. They have attempted to
terrorize the Republicans into the aban-
donment of the bill at the present ses-
sion at least 1t is not known how much
the foreign shipping lobby is willing to
contribute to the Democratic campaign
fund if the bills consideration is defer
red until the short session. Postpone
ment, say the foreign shipping lobby,
means the bills defeat.
A $2OO,0OO,OOO year business is the
stake. If Democratic threats of filibus-
tering are effective enough to induce
Republicans to postpone the considers
ton of the shipping bill, the foreign
shipping lobby, their free trade allies
and Democratic dupes will each have
carried their point.
democratic success up to this time
is the more amazing, as their own dis
organization on this question is dis
closed. 1t would be imagined that they
would be united In opposition to the
bill, if intending to make a campaign
issue of it. Just the reverse Is the case.
They are about evenly divided for and
against it. This is shown by the two
minority reports that have been filed
by the Democratic members of the
House Merchant Marine and Fisheries
Committee. The first report filed was
Ter, of New York; John II. Small, of
North Carolina, and Joseph e. Rams
dell, of Louisiana tt ,ir report advo-
Gates government aid and opposes free
ships. Their suggested amendments to
the bill are not of a character to seri
ously minimize Its effectiveness.
The other four Democratic members
of the House Merchant Marine and
Fisheries Committee who signed the
other report are Messrs. John F. Fitz-
gerald, of Massachusetts; Marion De-
Vries, of California; Thomas Speight,
of Mississippi, and VIM. D. DAILY, Of
New Jersey. Their support opposes
subsidies and in effect advocates free
ships. Their report, said to have been
written by an attorney of the foreign
steamship lines, is largely an attack
upon the only American steamship line
engaged in the transatlantic trade.
The odium attaching to the Demo-
Gratis who are fighting the battle Of the
foreign shipping lobby In Congress, and
who advocate the purchase of ships
ton in the United States, presents them
In very sorry figure. They will be
infinitely more busy In defending their
own attitude on this question than they
can be In assailing that of the Repub-
licans and a large contingent of their
own party associates. The Democratic
leaders had made desperate efforts to
prevent public disclosure of their diff
ferences, but the courage of nearly one
half Of the minority made further con-
cealment of their condition impossible.
The Democratic members of the COM
mittee who advocate government aid
by Independently filing their report in
advance of the submission of the other
minority report, forced the signers of
the latter to lamely limp last into the
public eye. Their hopeless division
shows how utterly impossible it will be
for them to make a successful cam
paign issue Of the shipping question.
If Democrats attack a government
aided shipping, Democrats who have
the best of the argument may be quoted
In answer Republican ammunition with
which to refute Democratic attacks of
this character need not be used-it Is
furnished by the more honest and cour-
ageous Of the Democrats themselves.
This is a situation which seems al
most providential for the united Re
publicans. They seem to be assured of |
the votes Of a large contingent-possi-|
bly, one half-of the Democrats in the |
House In favor of the ship subsidy bill, |
If 1t Is brought up for passage now.
Such an opportunity has not been pre- |
sented in a generation, and may never |
again occur so favorable.
The same situation exists in the |
Senate. The Democrats there are un-
able to prepare, much less present, a |
report in opposition to the |
ship subsidy bill. 1t is well and pub
licly known that a number Of Demo
Gratis will speak and vote for the bill. |
What the Democratic leaders desire to |
avoid, at all hazards, is the effect it |
will have upon their party followers |
that will surely result from the discus
sion in the Senate of the ship subsidy |
bill at this session, to disclose a sub |
stantial contingent of their own party |
associates in advocacy and voting for |
that bill.
If Republicans can be coerced, intim-
idated or cajoled into postponing the
Of the ship subsidy bill |
at the present session, the Democrats
may be able to conceal their own weak
ness in divided opposition to the ship |
subsidy bill in the Senate. A little in
cident has clearly demonstrated this,
and shown the desperation of the Dem
Dcratic leaders.
The Chairman Of the Democratic Ma
tional Committee, In his rage at the
fling of the Chanler-Small Ransdell re-
port, sent for these gentlemen and be-
-