Delaware gazette and state journal. (Wilmington, Del.) 1883-1902, 1900-09-13

y
George W. Spicer; Eighth, Harvey
4 Baldwin, Daniel j. Hyde, Henry
Kelley, John Nipin, Patrick Touhey
Twelfth district, J.Amos Collins,
james A. Mulligan and Richard T.
Cam, Jr. Thirteenth, Clarence r.
Clayton; Fiftesnth, Robert N. Higgins,
John Leckerman, Mordeoai Lurty-3i.
ASTI-FouD DgLEGArts.
The following delegates are either
favorable to candidates opposed TO Mir.
Ford or unpledged; Wilmington First
district, Thomas Reardon. who defeated
Eroy Davis by So to n: rural New
Castle-Sixth Representative district,
Joseph Z. Hanby; Seventh, Will
liam j. King; Ninth, Charles B.
Evans, Joseph H. Hosainger, Eugene
Lewis, Thomas Hawthorn and James
T. Marshail Tenth, Alexander B.
Cooper, George b. Pustill, David
dell. Janyier: Eleventh, N. 7. Davis,
William @ Bigger, David g. Rose,
William T.Skinner and Edward Cooch !;
Twelfth, James z. Cannon and William
Reynolds; Thirteenth, Michael Keegan,
Sir, Irving s. yallandigham, William A.
Comegys and John W. Carrow Four
teenth, William L. Graves, Colen Fer
guson, g. M. d. Hart. John Townsend
and James *. Roberts; Fifteenth,
John w. Roberts and Joseph Van Pelt,
81.
DIR. Black and Mr.. Cooch carried
their own districts and secured dele
gates in other Districts and it is diff
cult to say just what the opposition to
the candidacy of Mr.. Ford will do
Some of those VINO are cassed as Ford
delegates in the list may be favorable
to another candidate, while some of
those who are considered anti Ford
people may be favorable to him, SO
that 1t is impossible to give an accufats
list of those who are either for or
against his nomination. 1t is said tho
delegation is favorable to the nonlina.
tion OF Deputy Attorney General Peter
L. Cooper Of this city for attorney gen
eral The other candidates are former
City Solicitor Harman and former
Deputy Attorney General Thos. Davis.
COUNTY CONVENTION DELEGATES.
The contest in this city for county
convention delegates resulted as follows;
First Representative district-.First
pt.hoky alstIIct, Jonn L. 1uYar, so,
John L. Mcdowell. l2I; Robert E.
SCHUYLER, 81; John ?. Welsh. 148;
Second primary district. 80, 100, 10,
Schuyler. 72; Welsh. 30; Third pri-
mary district, John e. Kane "a; Emil
Hertel, 96; Fourth primary district,
John L. Kane, 1873; Emil Hertel, 1888;
Fifth primary district, John E. Kane,
50; Emil Hertel SO: Sixth primary
district, John E. Kane, 101: Emil
Hertel, 9S; totals, Kane, 452 IIertel, A53.
Second Representative district-Fif
teenth primary district. Holland, 135;
Spath, 49; Sixtesnth primary district,
Bowen, OIL; fireman. 93: Seventeenth
primary district, Cooney, IA; Gagan,
So; Joyce, 81; Eighteenth primary dis.
trict, Cooney, 6s; Gagan, 1873; Joyce,
Joyce, 1874.
Third Representative district Nine
teenth primary district Boettger, 56;,
Koocb, 139; MeIntyre, 141; Twentieth
primary district, Ginder, 1870; Jacobs,
80; Twenty first primary district,
Sewer, 1855, Vanaant, 60.
Fourth Representative district-Sev-
eenth primary district, William 7.
Green, 2TS; James Ii. Ilarkins, 27S;
Eighth primary district, Bierman, ;3l4;
Mcbride, %; McKelvey, 95; O'Connor,
21Si Ten Weeges, S6: Ninth primary
district, Ill, 10, 1873, 10, 149; totals,
Herman, 425 Mcbride, rs; McISelvey,
224; O'Connor, 357; Ten Weeges, 235.
Fifth Representative district First
district, Carroll, l95; Long, IA j. }.
Haney, 1872; Second district, Carroll,
278; Long, $50; Haney, 31s: totals, Car
rnll, 473; Long, 224; Hansy, 500;
Third, Early, 40; Reardon, 81: Fourth,
Early. 2O2; Reardon, l02; totals, Early,
247; Reardon, l69
Fifth, Ryan, 207; Stannard, Sc.
4 During the entire day the friends of |
various gubernatul ial candidates kent
watch on the polling places and got,
the voters out, but, Notwithstanding |
the unusual activity, there appeared to |
be no Ill feeling and the contest passed |
off without any serious alterations at |
any Of the polling places.
In TACT. there was the same interest |
all around wherever there were con
tests, hence the large vote polled. The
friends of candidates left no stone un-
turned. In the Second Senatorial dis
trict Of the city Francis j. McNulty
had little difficulty in defeating Dennis
$. Shields, while former Senator John
Pyle was distanced. j. Prince Ford,
candidate for Representative in the
First, won easily, as did also George B.
Ward in the Second, Thomas NJ. Mona
CHAN in the Fourth and John E. Healey
in the Fifth. Messrs. Monaghan and
Healey are both members OF City Coun-
Oil.
The auti-Ford delegates nut up
strong fight in Christiana hundred.
SEicer defeated Lyman there by only
four Votes. This fight was in charge OF
Martin e. Smith.
G' CHAIRMAN NBARY PLEASED.
WELL" remarked Chairman Neary
of the, county committee. at midnight
Saturday night, when the result was
pretty we'll known, II am :ert much
pleased with the result. We will have
one of the strongest tickets ever pre-
sented to the voters Of New Castle
county, and one that will be very dill.
,ult to, beat. There is not man on it
who is at all questionable. | take
pride, in looking over the candidates
Tor Legislature, to note that there is
lot y pur ohasable man In the list.
5hink the Democrats have the very best
'easons for feeling encouraged about
The result of the election. -
|