New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1900-01-11
MoLINEUX NOT THE MAN.
Continued from First Page.

his redirect examination. He began by endeav-
orlng to show that she had contradcted herself
or the question as to whether Mr.. Arnold was
in the store on December 81. 1898. She was GER
tain ne was she said. She knew 1t from himself
and from the other saleswomen. and she saw
him there herself
SAW THE MAN DISTINCTLY.
The point on which Mr.. Osborne attacked the
witness most vigorously was the question
whether the man who bought the holder stood
directly under the electric light, or away from it,
so that the light fell upon him. Miss Miller said
he stood three or four feet away. Mr.. Osborne
read a signed statement to a newspaper, saying.
among other things, that the man stood directly
under the electric light. The witness insisted
that there was no contradiction that she had
always said the man stood three or four feet
away from the electric lamp. that she could see
him well, and remembered the scene perfectly.
o-When you gave Detective Carey description
Of fhe man did YOU give him true one? Ayes.
o-Didn't you tell then that the man was a man
Al said he looked like a gentlemen.
QYou said he had Van DYKE bearot A A. res;
he was a man. of delicate appearance refinement
and culture? Al don't know. =, - =.
C-WeII you made q sworn statement in my OF
Hoe didn't you? Ayes. - =. -,,
Q-And you said that he was man OF Few
words. He didn't anything more than he had
man Of eentienanly apPeaTanss; slight build sandy
Did you ever see a who would answer
that description? A.-Yes. many Of ft them Vas
Q.-Dont you think there are hundred OF tneh!
Q.-And you couldn't say who it was? A 40,
o.-You are positive about anything concern
o.-Didn't your sister ask you night before last
Now. Emma, was it a man or woman! A
oZWeil would YOU go SO far as to v swear posi-
Q.-Now, can you be sure it was man? A-hes.
THE SALE OF THE HOLDER.
Now. Miss Miller. want you to tell the jury
just how far you can go in Identifying the man
in and said he wanted something TO put brom9
bottle in t0 SEM fbo t9 h be wsed that
asked Miss Kane whether 5 a6 W wSnte dH
/ showed it to the He hesitated moment
and then said he'd take it. .ro
wiling to swear RSOst ma1 as tS any marx
Of To Stated that this took place
O'clock Al stated to you that it might have
p o'LNoW' the only reason you have for fixing the
time is that d the Ig know wsTe NAT hat Miss Kane thinks
it earlier than You make nostye Whether
she saw the sale or another one. -, .bts ~oo,
Don't remember, that that, when Hs THIS man
Ole was pale and had gray eyesE Ares
Witness then admitted that Mr.. Arnold had
spoken TO her of the case before, and that ne
said "They are accusing Molneux It's shame
I know Mr. MolineuX
ARNOLD SPOKE ABOUT MOLlNEOA.
$50 Mr. Arnold. of your store. spoke to you
sbout Mr.. Molineux and told you he knew him
and that 1t was shame to accuse him; all this
before Moneux was shown to your
Miss Miller said Yes" Mr. Osborne there
upon proceeded to question the witness as to
her knowledge of the case in the earlier part OF
the year and sought to have her admit that she
knew if she identified Molineux 1t would mean
that an accusation would be lodged against MIN:
Miss Miller however, was non-comnlltIal' anu
insisted that she had been Influenced by no mo
tives whatever when she said that MoiheuA
was not the person who bought the bottle hold-
er She repeated also, that the purchaser hao
a light Van Dyke beard.
RECORDER EXAMINES MISS MILLER.
Mr.. Weeks again examined the witness but
brought out nothing new beyond laying further
stress on the fact that it was to some one else
Than Molineux to whom she sold the holder.
Recorder Golf also examined her briefly, in the
course Of which she said she doubted If she
would be able to identify the purchaser If he
were brought before her. despite her evidence
regarding the defendant. at is easier" she ex-
plained ''for me to be able to say that the de-
fendant not the man than 10 be able 10 say
who the was"
After Leonard c. Levy, of the firm Of Morris
Hermann &. Co, had testified that he had not
Instructed the much sought for Zeller to cease
coming to this city after the beginning of the
trial John c. Emory and Charles ii. vessels,
that the writing of the address on the poison
package was written by the same hand which
penned the conceded writings.
The trial was adjourned until 1880 O'Clock
this morning.