The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1900-05-26

about the LIST Of November OF tho same
year. Plaintiff lived with her narentS
in the United States from said Novem-
Der until about April, A. D. 1898. DIR
ing this period the defendant remain
ed on said yacht, and in the meantime
sailed 1t to Hongkong, where plaintiff
joined MIN early in May, 1898. and
they lived thereafter upon said Yacht
until about the end of the month when
defendant announced his intention of
proceeding thereon to Manila. On or
about the first day of June, 1898. plaIn-
till objected to staying longer on said
yacht, and stated to defendant thar the
same was an unfit place for her m live
that TO remain thereon was extremely
dangerous and Injurious to her health
and tnat IL was unreasonable for him
10 expect her to longer continue In
such place and mode of living; all Of
Wnlcn SAID statements were true: bur
defendant insisted that plaintiff shoulr
remain with him on said Yacht. and
plaintiff yielded to his commands ana
wishes In this respect and proceeded
with him thereon to Manila, reaching
that port in June, 1898, and thence they
sailed to Borneo, reaching Sandakan
on that island, in August, 1898. and re-
NAMED there about six weeks. and then
sailed TO Labuan, remaining there about
one month, and thence sailed to Sinca-
pore. arriving at the latter place in tic
month of November following. Dur
ing all this time, with rare exceptions.
plaintiff lived on said yacht by dav
and by night, even when in port. From
November, 1898, until April, 1899. the
Plaintiff and the defendant remained
at Singapore, living on the yacht a
part of the time, when not visiting
residents of said place
Not Mentioned in the Complaint,
The only journey not mentioned in the
complaints is the Countess trip across
the continent from the palatial Haggin
mansion on Fifth avenue to the desert
ed }. b. Haggin home on Taylor street
In this city. Without any fuss or fur
ry the Countess Festetics came about
TWO weeks ago, TAXI up her abode at
the Haggln home and now and then
honOrlng her grandaunt, Mrs. LLOYD
Tevis, with her presence at the latter
lady's dinner table. The Countess lost
no valuable time during her brief
stay. She sought the advice of E. S.
Pillsbury, whose name as attorney
for plaintiff" is affixed to the com.
plant, and then went for rest and re-
creation to the beautiful place in Napa
Valley, the home of her aunt. Mrs.
George Hooper
The lady who has appealed to the
law to rid her of husband and title was
formerly Miss Ella Haggin, daughter
OF Mr.. and Mrs. Louis Hagin. and
grandniece of Mrs. Lloyd Tevis. 1t
was during a two years sojourn in
Paris, during which period Miss Hag-
gin was undergoing the elaborate edu-
cational process of being finished off, .
that she met Count Festetics. The
Count at that time was cutting quite
dash in the social world of the gay
capital. He had not yet thought of
navigation, but was contented with
driving a four-in-hand in the bois.
The piquante American girl attracted
the attention of the Austrian lieuten-
ant, and when she left for her home in
New York FeStetics found business to
call him to the American metropolis.
The wedding which followed was a
quiet but elegant one, as BELTS the nup-
tials OF the daughter of many times
millionaire and a nobleman of the Aus
TRAN empire. 1t is to this wedding that
the society gossips are now referring
and building the possibilities of what
the titled gentleman's answer to the