The news & observer. [volume] (Raleigh, N.C.) 1894-current, 1900-03-14
Decision of the Lower Court
Affirmed.
BY THE SUPREME COURT
The Dispensary Law Fully Sustained by the
Court.
THE BurFALoE DIVORCE CASE ENDS
Supreme Court Affirms the Decision of the
Lower Court Giving Mrs. Buffaloe Di-
vorce--Last Of the Political Cases
Decided.


Opinions were handed down as follows
In the Supreme court yesterday:
White vs. Murray, from Madison; af-
frmed.
State vs.. Gender, from Union; affirm
ed.
Baker VS. Hobgood, from Granville; new
trial.
Carr VS.. Bank, from Durham; error.
Jordan VS.. Furnace Co.; new trial.
Garsed VS.. Greensboro; no error in both
appeals.
Owens vs.. Railroad, from Granville; af-
1rmed.
Slaughter VS., OBerry, from Wayne, af-
firmed.
Ellis VS.. Massenburg, from Franklin !:
new trial.
Stancill VS.. James, from Pitt; affirm
ed
Beacon VS.. Boing, from Vance; re-
versed.
Finch VS.. Gregg, from Nash; affirmed.
Ray VS.. Insurance Company, from
Vance; affirmed.
Wick VS.. Wick, from Nash; new trial.
Howard VS.. Early, from BERTHE; aew
trial.
Dowtin VS.. Beardsley, from Warren;
reversed.
Commissioners of Green VS.. Best; ap-
peal withdrawn.
In the following cases there were no
written opinions, and they were DISPOSED
of by per curtain order as follows:
Buffaloe VS.. Buffaloe, from Wake; af
f1rmed
Tate VS.. Foushee, from Al ,mance; If
firmed
Chappell VS.. Morris, from Durham at
frmed.
State VS.. Barbee, from Durham; al
tirmed, upon the authority of State IS.
Chadbourn, 80 n. c.. 479 and State KS.
Yearly, SO n. c. SCI.
Graham VS.. Walker, from Fender, me-
tion to reinstate appeal refused
CASES ARGUED YESTERDAY.
Cases were argued in the Supreme court
on yesterday as follows:
Johnson VS.. Rogers, from Third district;
submitted on brief by T. T. Hicks !ur
plaintiff, T. M. Pittman for defendant.
Sixth district appeals:
State VS.. Irwin; argued by J. y. Rouse
by brief and Shepherd for the Attorney
General for the State, T. C. Wooten for
defendant.
State VS.. Kinsaul; certiorari ordered.
for the Attorney General for the STATE,
T. c. Wooten for defendant.
Commissioners of Greene vs.. Best; ap.
peal withdrawn at cost cf plaintiff.
Graham VS.. Walker: argued or motion
to reinstate appeal by ]. d Kerr for
plaintiff, F. r. Cooper and Stevens &
Beasley for defendant.
McLamb VS.. McPhail; by F. R. Cooper,
Shepherd & Shepherd and Stevens &
Beasley for plaintiff, j. L. Stewart, Al
len G Dortch and J. d. Kerr for defend
ant.
Heyer VS.. Rivenbark; continued under
former order to make parties.
Brown vs. Morisey; by Stevens &
Beasley for plaintiff, Allen & Dortch for
defendant.
Darden VS.. Blount: by f. A. Woodland
and Aycock & Daniels for plaintiff, Snep-
herd & Shepherd, Conner & Son and Swift
Galloway, by brief, for defendant.
Wooten vs.. Railroad; continued by con-
sent
Craft VS.. Home Association; certiorari
ordered and case continued.
Chemical Co. VS.. Kirven; certiorari or
dered and case put to the end of the
docket for argument.
SEVENTH DISTRICT DOCKET.
Appeals from the Seventh district will
be called next Tuesday, March goth, as
follows:
State VS.. Mclaughlin.
Little VS.. Ratliff.
Carter VS.. Railroad.
Worth vs.. Lancashire.
McCaskill VS.. Lancashire.
Muse VS.. Caddell.
Smith VS. TeW