The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1900-03-17
THE COURT RECORD.
APPELLATE COURT.

30l6. Toner VS.. State Bank. Fulton G. G.
Reversed. Comstock. il. Where person
is carrying on the business of a warehouse
man, under Section 272O. r. S., 1894, and
executes grain receipt in compliance with
Section 1922. r. s., 1894. transfer of the
grain by delivery of the receipt only is
an equitable assignment of the interest of
the bailor and the assignee, takes what
ever rights the receipt gave the depositor.
2. grain receipt which reads as follows:
Received of -, eighty-four and $3.50
bushels wheat in store, subject to our
charges for insurance" is a contract of
bailment. an agreement to store, to hold
subject to the demand of the bailor. and
subject to the insurance charges provided
for the grain received 3: The title of the
bailor to the property bailed cannot be
questioned by the bailee. 4. The transfer
of such receipt by delivery and not by in
dorsement does not make such receipts ne
gotiable, and such tranSferee takes them
without prejudice to any defense or other
set-of existing at the time of before
notice of the transfer to the bailee.
1887 Hatfield VS.. Chenowith. Huntington
G. G. Petition for herhearing overruled.
$780, Standiford vs. Shidler. Marion S. G..
Motion to dismiss and withdraw record
granted.
$685. Bosnian VS.. Mendenhall. Delaware
c. G. Motion to amend assignment of err
rors granted.
3l6S Western Union Telegraph Com
pany VS.. Carter. Monroe c. c. Motion to
transfer to Superior Court granted.
$3.50. Western Union Telegraph Com
pany VS.. Ferguson. Monroe c. c. Motion
to transfer to Superior Court granted.
SUPERIOR COURT.
Room John l.. McMaster, Judge.
Harry Temperley VS.. Manufacturers
turned verdict for plaintiff for $1.SO9.
Annie Oakley VS. Perry Manufacturing
Company; damages. On trial by jury.
Room flames NJ. feathers. Judge
Statehouse Building Association VS.. Alex
ander Marley ct al; account. Judgment
set aside by order of court
Richard w. Yarbaugh VS.. G. NJ. Williams
ct al; to quiet title. Unknown heirs of Sarah
E. Yarbaugh defaulted. Finding for plain
tiff to quiet title. Judgment against plain
tiff for costs.
Kate Hackney vs. New York Investment
Company ct al: foreclosure. Argument
concluded and taken under advisement
William Z. Miller ct al. VS.. G. Wishmier
ct al; mechanics lien. On trial by court.
Consolidated Paint and Oil Company vs.
Christian Zurich mechanics lien. Dis
missed and costs paid.
Room 3-vinson Carter Judge
Christine E. Resener VS. James Shea
foreclosure. Finding and judgment against
James Shea for $3.50 and costs. Decree of
foreclosure.
Jacob Kahn VS.. Michael C. Staley; dam
ages. Taken under advisement.
julius v. Piazza VS.. Salvador Castro t:
account Taken under adviSement
Wallace Marshall VS.. Isaac p Russell ct
al; note. On trial by court.
CIRCUIT COURT
Hon. Henry Clay Allen, Judge.
Patrick II. Smith VS.. Central Union TeIe-
phone Company ct al; trial resumed Ad-
ditional evidence heard.
CRIMINAL COURT
Fremont Afford Judge
Harry Hall; grand larceny Trial to he
resumed on the I'D day OF March, 1900 at
a. m.
Flavius J. Meyers; grand larceny and
embezzlement. Trial by jury resumed
Frank w. Erdlemeyer and Frank
Erdlemeyer. jr.; doing business without
license. Defendant Frank Erdlemeyer ~
arraigned. Plea of guilty Fine of s. and
costs. Nollied as TO Frank W. Erdlemey.r-
NEW SUITS FILED.
Vesta A. Miggenburg VS. Henry B. Mig
genburg: complaint for divorce. Superior
Court. Room 2.
David T. Cooper and Flora A. Cooper VS.
John Goodnough; on note. Demand, Sis 90.
Circuit Court.
Minnie Frendelman VS.. Fred Frendelman:
on note. Demand. $3.50 Superior Court.
Room /.
Ira III. Jordan VS.. Rose n. Jordan:
divorce. Superior Court, Room g.