The Guthrie daily leader. [volume] (Guthrie, Okla.) 1893-1996, 1900-02-24


to take immediate acton and report as
early as practicable.
WASHINGTON. F7EB. % T0hay-o
session OF the senate was unusuaNy m
teresting from the very beginning. ~
spite of vigorous and influential oppo-
sition. MIR Penrose, OF Pennsyivanla,
succeeded in getting the Quay duets-
tion before the senate and d,uing tlie
afternoon three notable fpeehces were
delivered.
After a sharp parliamentary squaip-
bic. Mr. Penrose moved that the res
o'ution Involving the seatlng ~ Mr..
Quay be taken up for considerations
on an aye and no vote. the action pre-
vailed, "a 20 2S The majority WIS 80
decisive as TO cause some surpiisc. It
Ia known thad some Senators who VIII
vote. n the opportunity be offered 10
seat Mr. Quay. today voted agninit
the conf6deration OF the case. while on
the contrary, others who VOTED IN. con-
atdera,ion. probably wll vote againgk
seating him The vote cAannsd there
fo1e. be regarded as q test of Mr.s
Quay's absolute strength IN tire Ernafc
Following she taking up of s,ie resoln-
ton, Mr. Daniel. democrat, 81 Virgin
Ia. delivered a speeCh On which ne
vigorously supported Mr. Quay's right
to a seat.
Mr. Vest. Of Missouri and Mr. For
aker. OF Ohio. delivered nvtaasle speech
es anent the Hawaiian roySanmerm
bin. Both were constitutional argu-
ments
Mr.. Cul'om desired Il 10 be under
stood that whatever might be d ne with
the case. he would not convent TO the
displacement OF the Hawa am govern
men bin as the unfinished bugGuess
Mr.. Penrose replied ifrat white mo
had no intention Of Interfering with tiie
unfinished business. ne desired no iu-
form Mr. Cullosn that hp propofai 20
pre1s the question OF privilege ~ he
should be forced 20 DO 80.
After some sparrng, MT GTsce, taxi
ing beading part in ghe cppoeti ppn
To the Quay case dispfaning other Inn
portant matters. the char t7lsd hfat
only by unanimous consent or a major
IL, could the Quay case be taken up.
Mr. Penrose resented thE ruling. I'M
sistlng that the question was privileg-
ed business.
IN the course of the d8russton Mr
Foraker announced that me- cxpet
30 vote FOR the seating of Mr. QrrN,
Mr. A9drich then tried aia hand n
gottlng Mr.. Penrose 20 ueree fhat r'c
case be taken I'D merely ~ p'l,w oh
senator from Vlrgmia M Daniel
sneak, but Mr. Penrose enip'@tca =
refused t0 submit 70 any opnfitA-rr onH
on yoa and my vote carried fhe ctv
tLe Quay fen uticn benR tala n UP BY
% Nfe 81 "a to 2s
Nh. Daniel thea eddr-srsd the aena
10 uprort cf Mr.. Quays rrht OF n eeat
ht tAe conclusion of MN Dln'ers
pecch tho Hlwalian poV@Imrrtt bg
'sr taken gp and Mr. A1orFn retusa-
ga his eooorh.
Wr Mvrva1 not hvarf opnciud
yiodcd the fcor of 1925 81 NJ. q W
hdrch who pres aicd fhc ncnQrt
the cmrcrence rn the snrnl hH
whan the ra1inr of fhs renore irr
n concu1ed and an @dcr Ter y
pr MiuT nude GA arranNemNw a
the cenfcrorce cowr7fffe On.
Taurr3y .vou'd mako ssrfer
oou uns the u~ e bw s
nfcrtr ard ft n ra dtv Hn
rcrw wou'd be taca rp fr opr 3
eratrn
The fawnlian h7 wce a,a5n tn'sau
up end Mr. Vett os W'togr rdoa
at the senate TTo had been fmea y
opnc ci De saAd 20 the nrneTexicsi f
fawnl, hul that wua opw "a dc.d
sne I h71 vote FOR fhe bUl" 8aid De.
W ir hnpe qud bsyord rCnf'iu 3N1i
aittuu and daes not raise ary firuc
1icf ere r1fs3 in he re.at1n 90 e 81
~ ev nd me lh ppinrn"
Te ha1rh tnc ihfns so rhc ro-
nn were Hee ~ thH wm'pr mlso i-.
1 me1fure
Thrc Wa ra ergNtp 1 f
nna ttr aee asA nate
tNat iianl. ry n law 90
UHd
nf NEtUf