The Democratic advocate. [volume] (Westminster, Md.) 1865-1972, 1900-09-08
w....lse1o... D. q. - {. 90

EasaIzSIOs. D. c. September 4. 800
Ihe trez5dsatlzI ezsaseign has nov reached that
stage d active operation where IL i in order 70 sub
Iaii soEse hgures sbozing with prophetic q FORE
battle
probable FeSui froEB The Republican standpoint IN
rues1f issue Of ihe Washington Post gives Il sure
in he doubtful esIansn- To Mckinley ne give.
ColBactSszsf Ioxz. Maine. Massachusetts,. 3i1oeso
4. Nes Hzsapshires SeE Jersey. North D1koia.
Ohio. OREGON Psnllsy iTz1is, Rhode Island, Yer
Eno1f aud ws0oing, with Is electoral yOtes- To
Bryan be ecneeass Aizteiz.a. ArkAI.s.s fiorld=.
Georgs LO1islziza Mississippi. Missouri Sebr1skA.
SeyssI4 North fz-oliI.s SO,iIt Carolina Tennessee
Texas and Virginia SirA i4J elee1orlAl vOse= The
e,-.ess i..s de @ $50 and serz eoodiiiosas
TeDder doubtful. Ibo1gh he thinks. naturally
enough Ine Chances are better LOT lehlDssy 70 %
Bryan
1, i customary with the American sporting public
10 discount The chances Of scce<z Of hcrse once
beaten. when he co1sss up for second race but
notwithstanding this we'll recognized principle
yOQr readers zOol1 t,e surprised 70 know how many
-zgzesO1S politicians packing Bryan f- the "
ne- in The E-e-siing eoatssz They reckon ihst the
far-re2eing conseq nenee q The policy Of imperial
is13. l1tO = h3ca The Republican parry has mealg
piuEge1. and from which Il cannot nOs refr=ci.
gil feceszrily slzEIE tie conservative sentiment
I-od 81 their party cord To.e for BIZ an, by
zbssnilOn frUa Fotilg 10 t2ciflE permit hes e4ec
ilSa. hleh hey .,eieTe Sili IN ne preseDt ersf
g<1ey p-eEEe the constitutional integrity OF the
ksp1oiie- without eOdzngerng any of lis essential
poljeisz
To This ckEzse largely the spacious politicians
ferred 70 ztlr5b1Ie the SEerzi apathy which nrz1
manifested ilszlf The tame Yroce%dingS Of the
PnilzdelPsiz convention. and Of zhieh Rep1bli-
Cans All around 81 still complaining
IL significant E=ef. which has leaked ont. that
ESitic1Iss nigh il The Republican councils are coa
csdIug that -eir presidential ticket VIII receive
800 . KS TO,e- IN SeE IO-k STATE than IN lses
while theiT O--fy IL Hsi1ols and Indiana viii be
re6uea1 20 podaf uDeoz1fO<tzblly near The danger
line
1t IS Z ki.ss Of general concession among the
in 1870 than n Iss5, and The Only o01te1fIOn i
hetaer there Viii be sufficient shnnkEge In bis
vote 10 Compass his defeat This X may Be here
stated. Cur political histcry ss5oEs has seoezlly
oEn successor. but the following sredoc causes OF
lhe Mckinley administration are giFing.rhe ReDub-
l3eaa 1De4zs8esz VIZ Anri-intseEl4lisI-
Hsr reEeaue izE, sIr1 especially stamp tax
Antitrust agitation LzDOE f-O1osez he anti
ezut==a agitation Detection Of Gold D-1OerztE-
Dissatisfaction among the Negroes The sOaEcss
Of troDie AFSzr 10 De especially grzTe In the piE
otAl states Of Illinois End Indiana
On the other hand Democratic leaders conf
dent Inst Bryan sill bold with practical solidity
receive large 4eeeSiOns from the general tread Of
puasiie opinion away tfSGl the Mckinley admins
irzfioa-
an sure ziiI beirzy 10 eou6isnees nor furnish
any mrsziga material Tor the Republicans. when
sut5Oin few figures disclosing II the sane time
lie democratic prospect Of SUCCESS. and where the
real fed Of battle lies This last il may be preisi
does not cover Il states, As indicated in the Re
publican estimate above quoted from the Post. b1i
is confined 10 . much narrower field, although
wave might land the whole Of the u in the Demo
cratic coiGlnn-
Firzr, then. Democratic leaders give Bryan tie
I7s -sec.orzi votes received IN Isss, As follows
- "a r. ~nn1-- 4