The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1900-10-06
Brass Bands Tried to Drown Bryan's
Voice in 1896,
'"s q,HE PEOPLE GAVE HIM MOST RE
:" TUL ATTENTION in 1900.
The President Is Called Upon TO Attend opening OF
New Industries but 1t Is Entirely DIFFERENT
When the Trusts Close One

time to go to Oregon. II no ! wane to /
tell him to go to the city OF Wasnins' t
ton. That is nearer 60 10 Wasnlns.uh
and find out what provision the repubi- /
can administration has made for the e
voters OF Porto Rico.
Now you are responsible Why don /
you correct that? If YOU have not the
time to go TO Washington, let me REMIND
you that your administration mas nAue 4
the Sulu treaty and the Sulu treaty pro-
vides that our flag shall hoat over ine
sultan's palace and that We shall pay tue
sultan so much to keep II hoatng there,
That nag floats today over Sulu slaves
and the treaty recognizes slavery as an
existing institution and irstead OF pro-
viding that the slaves shall he free, tne
suM treaty provides In article 10 that
he shall have the right to purchase his
freedom whenever he can make enough
working for nothing day to buy him
! self at the market price There was
never a more shameful piece OF hypo-
crisy than that under which the repuoll-
cans hide when they talk about Southern
amendments. II was a republican con-
gress that took the right to vote away
from those in the District of Columbia
and for thirty years tho negro has been
electing republican presidents and getting
janitorships for return and you never
hear a modern republican say anything
fOT MIN except NulNuN q NNA'f"'H" "HfN
his vote is needed
Anderson Ind. October 5.-The meet
ing which closed here at 10 O'Clock to-
, night was the last of series of remark
ably large political demonstrations made
, in connection with the appearance OF
4 Hon. w. j. Bryan He made speeches
TODAY in succession at NOblesViue' AF-
cadia Tipton. Elwood. Alexandra, VA
rlon Hartford City Muncie Winchester
Richmond Newcastle and Anderson y
majority of these places are important
, manufacturing centers and all the COM
munities traversed are cohsloeteu
publican in politics. They could NOT
:, bowever have given the democratic can
:, didate a more cordial reception than they
:, ovtanded There were immense outpphr-
Z ings at all the towns RStd no interrnp-
!, tSons occurred. Mr.. Bryan. after the las
y speech was concluded. expressed hlmse'
&C greatly pleased with the days ex
u neriences The sneeches averaged hal
Y an hour. Though the Anderson speech VA
lie much longer. In one or two Instances Mr
: Bryan refused to go 10 distant stanh
10 because of the difficulty OF gettln
IL through the crowds I'D tho loss ~ ne
IL st Hartford City Mr.. Bryan found
text for his remarks in some Nh'ld7
l. posters conspcuously displayed on ded
IA wall In the distance Referring TO thes
y posters, Mr.. Bryan said;
10 "I see over on the side ~ that bar
sr a bill or poster and all that can max
, n out OF it here is that Mckinley VIZ
IS right. Now the question I want to as
-. -. is. WHICH TINE WAS HE RIGHT? va
he know, my friends, man who Is on bot
as sides OF a question has a great advantat
te over the man who Is only on one sid
rol The man who gets on both sides must
te right some time. but when was Mr. "
.iai Kinley right When he denounced CIR
NJ yer Cleveiand's financial policy. or W
no right when he did the same thing th
p" Mr. cleveland did? Which time was
ILL "r'
IN right in 1896. wen he said in his lett
10 ~ aceeptance that we did not need inc
S n money or was he right this year in
letter of acceptance. when he boas
tied that we had more money and thereto
~ ,',,. ought to be glad? Was he right wi
ne said in his letter OF 1896 that he wo
WIZ keen in circulation all the silver !
what paper money then included in the circr
- "a, ton or was he right when he signed
cent hin 10 retire the greenbacks and sub
tute National bank note2 Was ne II
and when IN his inaugural address, he pre-
had .r,i,,,, tho ,r,,
low ised TO enforce Tue Ia"
His - 40. he right when he did not emf
the law against the trusts when he
~, ~ promised to?
law. "Was he right when he pointed out
evils of the trust in his inaugural I
w sage, or was he right when he apo
onest an attorney general from New Jersey,
t tho homo a, the trusts, and allowed hin
lie OF n'iHe "
that draw his salary without enforcing the
no iutrusted to his keeping? Was he
option when he said in 1897 that foreioie ann
rss, ticp was criminal aggression and cont
intain to- our code of morality, or was he
: 80, when he sent $4,000 soldiers 1850
snr" away from home to force annexation
! for an unwilling people?
shall ,,, rfyht when he sad last
loy NJ was ny
cember that it was our plain duty to
before por,o R,co or was he
for free traue W
and II wben ne asked the members OF con
ne re- to vote against giving free trade to
ri was ,,o,, reoublicans to TAX.
e con- hieo "H''
Tas de- arguments made by your president
!, iS Ssyo then see which argumentyou Will &C