Watertown republican. [volume] (Watertown, Wis.) 1860-1906, 1900-07-24
GOLD AND SILVER.
THEIR LEGAL AND COMMERCIAL
RATIOS STUDIED.
Gold Goes Where Tt Finds Its Value
as:i That Value Is What the Laws
of Great Nations Give tive Must
Give 1t the Same Value.


ratio of silver to gold should be SO
changed as to approximate the COM
mercial ratio, the objection to the free
and unlimited coinage OF silver would
disappear This Is not true. 1t is a
Well-known historical fact that very
small variation of the commercial
ratio from the coinage ratio is sufficient
country and disturb all business calcu-
lationS and relations.
When the first United States coinage
act was passed, by careful calculation
and inquiry it was assumed that the
true commercial ratio was 10 to l, and
that was made the legal ratio. The
minis were opened to the coinage Of
both metals on that basis. In a short
time it became apparent that either an
error had been made or the market
ratio had changed. The two metals
would hot circulate together. Our gold
coins were slightly more valuable as
bullion than as money and were melted
down or exported.
This situation was maintained until
the act of 1884 changed the ratio to 16
to l, and tina. act, which was designed
to correct it, actually reversed it. 1t
brought back gold. but drove out silver
The true commercial ratio was some
where between Is to 1 and IS to 1. Eff
teen to l drove out gold, and 16 to 1
drove out silver. After the act of 1884
went into effect silver dollars would
not circulate in the United States I'M
less they were light weight. From 1885
down TO the opening of the year 1862,
when paper became the currency of the
United States, although the minis were
opened to the unrestricted coinage of
silver the total number of silver dol
lars coined was 50, roc, 533.
In 1920, when the change in ratio
was under consideration. Albert Gala
tin. who had been Secretary Of the
Treasury under jefferson, was asked
gold to circulate, and in letter dated
Dee. 81 wrote:
The present rate was the result of in
formation, clearly incorrect, respecting
the then relative value Of gold and silver
III Europe, which was represented as be-
ing at the rate of less than 10 TO l, when
it was in fact 15.5 to 1916 to l. 1t would
be better at all events to discontinue al
together the coming of gold than to con
tinue the present system.
The Hon. S. ID. Ingham, who was at
that time Secretary of the Treasury
under President Andrew Jackson, was
asked his opinion, and advised the COM
mittee that any attempt to make the
metals circulate together under free
coinage would be fruitlesS. He wrote:
The fluctuations in the value of gold
and silver cannot be controlled; and even
the attempt TO conform the mint to the
market values must produce a change in
the latter. But if, after adjusting the
ratio at the mint by raising the value of
the gold coins, it should happen that sill
yer should rise in the market above the
mint value, the silver coins-exchange
with foreign countries being unfavorab BILE
would be withdrawn from circulation,
and the only remedy within the power Of
the Government would be to reduce their
weight, us it is now proposed in respect
TO the gold coins.
The committee of the House Of Rep
resentatives having the matter under
investigation reported on Feb. %, 1881:
That there are inherent and incurable
defects in the system which regulates the
standard Of value in both gold and silver;
its instability as 4 measure of contracts
and nlutability as the practical currency
of a particular nation are serious imper-
fections, whilst the impossibility Of main
tanning both metals in concurrent. sim
ultaneous, or promiscuous circulation APP
pears to be clearly ascertained; that the
standard being fixed in one metal is the
nearest approach to invariibleness, and
precludes the necessity Of further legisla-
tive interference.
The change in rates continued, how
ever, to be agitated, and was advocated
with great energy by Thomas FL. Ben
ton. His argument is summed up as
follows in Bentons Thirty Years
View, vol. l, page 443:
Mr.. Benton said this was not the time
to discuss the relative value of gold and
silver, nor to urge the particular proper
ton which ought to be established be-
tween them. That would be proper work
I'll At cOIullltec al lTCSpul 1t might De
sufficient, and not irrelevant 30 say that
This question was one of commerce, that
it was purely and simply a mercantile
problem, as much SO as is acquisition of
any ordinary merchandise from foreign
countries could lie. Gold goes where it
finds is value. and that value is what the
laws of great nations give it. In Mex
leo and South America, the countries
which produce gold, and from which the
United States must derive their chief sup
ply. tbe value of gold is is to 1 in the
West Indies. generally, it is the same.
j is not to be supposed that gold will
come from those countries TO the United
States if the importer is to lose one dollar
III every sixteen that he brings, or that
our own gold will remain with us when
the exporter can give one dollar in every
fifteen that he carries out. Such results
would he contrary to the rules of trade,
and therefore we must place the same
value upon gold that other nations do if
we wish to gain any part of their trade
or TO retain any part of our own.
Benton'S statements that gold would
not come TO this country if the importer
must lose one dollar in every sixteen,
Sta .a-n0I.tGr aO111H mako ono