The sun., 1900-12-04
INCOME FOR CASTELLANES.
tTTHE RtrE ~ se5OOOO 4 yrsR TR y
frI> pRtPtRI 10 IMHI
ss, The, Have q Good Defence "a the London
Art Dealers tisim for p35 900 The
1emporsr, Injunction o. Nodin.d so ne
Ia Give the Count and toant-ss bread.

For the present Anna Gould Coun'nSs tas-
tellane, i to be allowed 10 draw monthly
income a. the rnte Df t?5ODp year. Win" her
trustees prepare tn resist the attempt Ia divert
part ~ her revenues Ia the payment Of alleged
debts The temporary iniu. Ction restraining
her trustees from paying her any 81 her income
until the claim ~ Asher Nsrthcimcr. n London
art dealer. against the Count and Countess
for s377.VoH = settled vas ~ far modified by
Justice Fitzgerald yesterday on ,oHson' Of the
parties
When the Temporary writ was returned yes
trrday before Justice I.eVsntritt. Johnf Dillon,
Charles \ Gardner and l. { James appeared
for the trustees under Jay Gould's viii namely.
George J . Howard. Edwin and Helen VI
Gould They moved an Adjournment ~ that
evidence may be- taken on commission IN be-
half OF the Count and Countess in opposition
to the motion to make n" Injunction perina-
nrut tol james expressly told the court
that the three lawyers did not appear Tor me
count and Countess h. statement was made
:, that the court would not have Juri -diCton
over the Count ana Countess un'I they get
th"Ir evidence. but tuudrri Brothers had
representative" on hand to look out for them
A. AFFIDAVIT OF LAWYER Gardiner was pre-
seuted which stated that III" defendants as
t"iianc have not been -"rv"d .n IA" proceeding
and are az HarI-. that II was necessary 70 get
their evidence and that oi other persons ABROAD
IN regard 10 the source. Hatur" and Grcun-
stances Of the alleged Indebtedness and the
d.fen eS thereto and also in regard 10 what
income j. necessary for th" r"a-Onsble ana
prOIar support of the Countess and Their chl-
dr"u according Ia their station IN lie. Without
such evidence. hs said, IA" trustees OF Jay
Gould could not properly meet the motion.
An affidavit Of Georse J could -ays;
"peloGrn' ,ay- ths' be- has fully and farly
stated the ca in 'hIS acton 10 his counsel,
charles 4 Gard her. and that the de'endan, tru--
tees herein have a good and substantial defence
pun the merits thereof. n he j. advised bv de-
ferdlnt- said counsel after such statement
made as af r.-aid. AID v'rlly believe.
Samuel ju'"rfnysr. IN behalf T. the IIdlltn,
said he was willing 20 grant the ad ournmehi "
counsel f,I ~" trustee r somebody else "oulu
appear far the count and Counties. ms was
moi agre.d Ia The court finally granted an
sd .Urn'uarf 90 Dor = and gave MIR ri"T-
u,vrr two weeks additional 'ine ~ pressn' any
nNdayi'> In r';ly ~ what may te iuen sub
rriff+d bN w. l~'.-.-
Col jane thercIpon asked that the iniunc-
tiou be nodded n mentioned above. lie
laid that Will. the complaint s"t up that the
1ounte--'. income i~ ss'.o" wear and mat
s25n.vlu l. enough for her 70 1--we on the ten.
I1rarv junction forbade. any payment az
all 60 her
Justice Ievortritt said that such a motion
shouli be made before Justice Fitzgerald VINO
i--u"d the temporary Injunction. toun-'!
got their heads together and agreed e. have
the temporary Injunction 50 MODIFIED that
The Countess can have the monthly allowance
az the rate Of ESQ 80 q year l.-uding IN" de-
ClsiOn of the motion 20 make th" Ir'unCtion
rarrranant ard on their consent Justice fltz-
gerald made the modification.