Daily inter mountain. [volume] (Butte, Mont.) 1881-1901, 1900-02-03
United States Court COnveneS
in Butte Tuesday.
SOME IMPORTANT SUITS
There Are Thirty Causes at Law and
In Equity on the distinctions
to be Heard.

The February term Of the United States
court in Butte will convene newt Tues
court in Butte will convene next Tues
day, Judge knowles presiding. The
following is the calendar:
No. 40.-Hum Fay ct al VS.. Frank Bald
win ct al. Action in equity; cause SUBJ
mitted for decision of the court IN ex-
ceptions to findings. Sanders and n
ders, attorneys for plaintiff.
No. 46.-Montana Ore Purchasing Co.
VS.. E. Rollins Morse. Action in equity;
cause submitted for decision of the court
on motion for decree. John j. McI1at-
ton, attorney TO plaintiff: John F. For-
bis, attorney for defendant.
No. 43.-Butte and boston Consolidated
Mining Company VS.. Montana Ore Pur-
chasing Company. Action at law cause
subml,ted for decision Of the court on
motion for new trial. John F. Forb,s.
attorney for plaintiff; Mediation, Corbett
& clayberg, attorneys for defendants.
No. BE. Rollins Morse VS.. Montana
Ore Purchasing Company ct al. Action
in equity; issue joined April 21st, 1897.
Forbis and Evans. attorneys for plain
tiff; Mediation and Vale, attorneys for
defendants.
No. 41.-Franklin Farrell ct al VS.. Bos.
Company. Action in equity; issue join
ed May 10th, 1898. H. A. Seymour n
G. A. Clark attorneys for plaintiffs;
]. F.. Forbis, attorney for defendant.
No. 42.-FranGlin Farrell ct al. VS.. Mon
tana Ore Purchasing Company. Action
in equity; issue Joined May 10th, 1898.
Henry A. Seymour, attorney for plain
tifrs; John J. Mediation, Clayberg 4
Corbett, attorneys for defendants.
No. 7.-Boston and Montana CONSOLE
dated Copper and Silver Mining Com.
pany VS.. Chile uold Mining Company e.
al. Action at law; issue Joined May
18th, 1898. Trial ordered stayed until
trial of cause No. SO. Forbis and Evans,
attorneys for plaintiffs; G. w. Stapleton,
attorney for defendants.
No. 67.-lsador D. Freund VS.. Great
Northern Railway Company. Action at
law; issue joined May 18th, 1896. Clay
tiff; A. J. Shores. attorney for defend
ants.
No. &c. c. Parsons VS.. Monitor Gold
Mining Company. Action at law; is
sue June 21st, 1898. Geo. A. Clark at
torney for plaintiff; H. G.. McIntire, at
torney for defendants.
No. O.-Butte and Boston Consolidated
Mining Company VS.. Montana Ore Pur-
chasing Company ct al. Action in equity;
issue Joined July 5th. 1893. Forbis and
Evans, attorneys for Plaintiff; ]. ]. Nc
Hatton, attorneys for defendants.
No. and Boston Consolidated
Mining Company VS.. Montana Ore Pur-
chasing Company ct al. Action at law;
dered stayed until trial of cause No. 36.
Forbis and Evans, attorneys for plain
tiffs; J. ]. Mediation, attorney for de-
PENDANTS.
No. &c. c. Parsons VS.. Monitor
Gold Mining Company. Action at law;
Geo; A. Clark, attorney for plaintiff: H.
G. McIntire, attorney for defendant.
u No. 16.-BostOn and Montana Console
dated Copper and Silver Mining Com
pany VS.. Montana Ore Purchasing Conn
pany. Action at law; issue joined July
18th, 1898. Marshall, Dewitt, Forbis
and Evans, attorneys for plaintiffs; j.
J. Mediation, attorney for defendants.
No. 3O.-Erwin Davis vs.. Andrew }.
sue Joined September 5th, 1898. Logan
and Drensee, attorneys for plaintiff:
Cotter. HARDWOOD and Scallon, attorneys
for defendants.
Company VS.. Colusa Parrot Mining and
and Smelling Company. Action in
equity; issue Joined September 5th, 1898.
Dixon and Scallon, attorneys for plain
TN; and Corbett, attorneys for
defendant.
No: S3:-W. j. Ladd vs.. Montana Ore
Purchasing Company ct al. Action at
law: issue Joined November 18th, 1898.
Forbis and Evans. attorneys for plain
tiff; John J. McHatton, attorney for de-
PENDANTS.
No. 7S.-James Larkin an Insane Per-
son by R. j. Watson Guardian VS.. Butte
and Boston Mining Company EFT al. Ac-
i4th. 1895. III. John . J. Mc }fsaeo Na attorney
for plaintiff; Forbis md Evans, attor-
neys for ~fendant
No. S4.-W. J.. Ladd VS.. Montana Ore
purchasing Company ct al. Action in
equity; issue Joined December 23rd, 1896.
tOrb1s and Evans, attorneys for plain
tins; John j. Mediation. attorney for de-
PENDANTS.
No. 44-Butte inc Boston Consolidated
Mining Company VS.. Montana Ore Pur-
chasing Company. Action in equity; is
sue 5oled December 31st, 1898. John F.
Forbls, attorney for plaintiffs; McHat-
ton, Clayberg and Corbett, attorneys for
NO. SS.-Anaconda Copper Mining Com,
pan VS.. Colusa Parrot Mining and
Smelling Company. Action at law: is
sue joined February 3rd. 1899. Dixon
and Scallon. attorneys for plaintiffs:
Elayberg and Corbett, attorneys for de-
PENDANTS.
No. se.-Michael conley ct al. VI.
ton at law; issue Joined February 18th.
1899. Wines and Wines. attorneys for
plaintiff: Forbis n Mattison. attorneys
for defendants.
No. 9~S.-fIennesy ct al. VS.. savin Lisa.
Action in equity; issue joined May list.
1899. Pincof6s. Hopkins and McIntire.
attorneys for plaintiffs: Wines and
Wines, attorneys for defendant.
No: -.--Hennessy ct al. vs.. William b.
Gallick, ct al: Action in equity; issue
kins and McIntire. attorneys for plain
tiffs: Wines and Wines. attorneys for
defendants. -.
No. 1oO.--Carlos D. siegert ct al. VS..
Wliham 3. Gallicak ct al. Action in
equity; issue Joined May LIST, 1899. Hop
kins and McIntire, attorneys for plain.
TINS: Wines and Wines. attorneys for