The Republican., 1900-11-22
Edward II. Sincell, Solicitor, Oakland, Md.
Order Of Publication.
Calvin Anderson VS.. Arthur 7. Amick in
FAINT, and George w. W. Amick
No. 1014 Equity in the Circuit Court for Gar
rett County. MARYLAND


The object of this suit is to procure a de
cree for the sale of certain real estate. stu
ate in Garrett county, Maryland, and for a
division of the proceeds thereof according
to their respective interests. between the
parties to this suit.
The bill states that on the third uav of
February. 1859, the State of Maryland granted
unto certain John Phillips tract of land
called Mount CeniS.' containing 265 5-l6
acres, lying now in Garrett county, and
certified copy of the patent for said land is
exhibited with the rill: that being seized and
possessed of said land, said Phillips departed
this life about the year 1869, inteState leay-
ing surviving him. as his only heirs at law, a
certain Elizabeth Phillips. his widow, who
was entitled to a dover interest in said land,
but has since departed this life, and the fol-
lowing named children: j. Lee Phillips, q
son, who dfSd intestate. unmarried and
without issue; Ella Phillips, daughter, who
also d.ed, intestate, unmarried and without
issue; Florence Phillips, daughter, who in
termarrled with the defendant George w.
W. Amick, but who has since departed this
life intestate, leaving surviving her son,
the said defendant, Arthur p. Amick, and
the said George W. w. Amick, her husband
and Minnie Phillips, daughter who inter
married with certain 1haddeus c. Hme-
baugh.
The bill further states that upon the death
of the said Elizabeth Phillips, j. Lee Phillips
Ella Phillips, the title to the above named
tract of land became vested to the extent of
an undivided one-halt interest in the said
Arthur p. Amick, subject to life estate in
the said George w. w. Amick, and the other
undivided one-haf interest in the said Min
ME Phillips Hinebaugh, who with her hus-
band conveyed the same to the plaintiff by
deed dated the fifteenth day of August, 1876.
and exhibited with the bill, so that the plain
tiff and the said Arthur p. Amick, whose es-
tate is qualified by the aforesaid life estate.
are seized as tenants i'll common in fee OF
said land.
The bill further states that it will be for
the interest and advantage of all the parties
to sell said land, the same not being SuScepti-
BILE of partition without material loss and in
jury, and to divide the proceeds between the
parties according to their respective inter
ests. but the said Arthur P. Amick is an in
FAINT under the age of twenty-one years. and
the plaintiff is advised that sale cannot be
had without the assistance of this Court.
The bill then prays that the defendants
may answer the premises: for a decree for
the sale of said land and distribution of the
proceeds in proportion to the respective in
tereStS Of the parties. and for general relief,
and an order of publication against the said
defendants, who are non-residents of this
State, giving notice of the object and sub
stance of said bill, and warning them to ap-
pear in this Court on or before a certain day
to answer the premises and show cause, il
any they have, why a decree ought not to
pass as prayed.
1t is thereupon ordered this sixth day OF
November, 1900 by tile Circuit Court for Gar
rett county, sitting in Equity. that the plain
tin by causing copy of this order to be in
serted in some newspaper published in Gar
rett county once in each of four successive
weeks before the 4th day of December. 1900.
give notice to the said absent defendants of
the object and substance of this bill, warn
ing them to appear in this Court in person
or by solicitor on OF before the 10th day of
December next, to show cause, if any they
have, why decree ought not to he passed
as prayed.
E.Z. TOWER. Clerk.
Z. Il. TOWER Clerk.