Courier Democrat. (Langdon, N.D.) 1891-1920, 1900-02-15
in DISTRICT COURT.
A Big Grind of Civil Cases Being
Tried In Judge Sauter's
Court This Week.
FEW CRIMINAL CASES.
Only Four Cases Have Been Dis
posed of Up to the Hour of
Going to Press.


by Judge Sauter on Monday afternoon
at two o'clock aud a steady grind at the
calender has been in progress up to the
hour of going to press, with the result Of
verdict having been reached in four
cases of minor Importance. The court is
making every effort to hasten the clean
ing up of all tue jury cases on the civil
calendar before hearing the court cases
and what few criminal cases may be
brought to trial. Little of puplic in
terest has as yet come up for hearing.
The calendar for the term IL as given
below.
Joseph Merry VS.. William Baker. for trial.
NJ. Long VS.. Isaac Penner, for trial.
George Diebel VS.. Ole o, Loken. Tried, YER
dict for plaintiff in the sum of $25.
William Eckley VS.. c. w. Clarke, for trial.
NJ. E. Foley, David Gullacher, et al. for trial.
w. H. Shepard VS.. B. Erickson, for trial.
State of N. OAK, VS.. j. j. Reilly. for trial.
Mooney McHugh vs.. w. j. Ross, for trial.
Geo. Ganssle VS.. E. I. Donovan, for trial.
J. j. Reilly VS.. C. F. Gill, for trial
L. R. Kelly vs.. John McLarty, continued.
Trotter & Co., VS. VIM. Herriott and and G.
G. Billings, motion for judgment.
Red River Valley Hail Insurance Co., vs..
Joseph Kartes, continued.
Red River Valley Hail Insurance Co., VS..
Joseph Sadie, continued.
Red River Valley Hail Insurance Co., VS..
John kartcs, continued.
Anton Olausen vs. Martin Lund, et al, mo-
ton to vacate.
VIM. G. Miller VS.. Martin Lund, ct. al, mo-
ton to vacatc.
John Rushford vs.. John Halliday, settled
Frances Z. Clogan VS.. Florence Currie, con-
tinucd over the term.
H. +. Close vs.. Julius Thon, settled.
A. T. Elliott VS.. Julius Thon. Tried, verdict
for plaintiff in the sum of S10
Farmers Trust Company VS.. Joseph McComb,
dismissed.
State of N. Oak, vs. N. r. McGruer, for trial.
State of n. Oak. vs. +. 1. Donovan, for trial.
State of n. Oak, VS.. ALERT & Co., for trial.
John G. Wittc VS.. j. j. Reilly ct. al, for trial.
E. c. Walsh VS.. A. R. Stewart, for trial.
Alvah p. Webster VS.. John McGauvran, Sher-
lift, for trial
Warnken & Co. VS.. Langdon Mercantile Co.,
motion for continuance.
John A. McIvor VS.. Thos. j. Burns, continued.
E. I. Donovan VS.. A. II. knhmstedt, for trial.
Chris Helgeson VS.. Lund Bros, continued.
W. A. Laidlaw VS.. James .Atchison, for trial.
Van Duscn Harrington Co. VS.. Milton Mill
Co., for trial.
Aaron Croft VS.. R. B. Gage, continued.
Achsa NJ. Cramond VS.. NJ. NJ. Chapman,
verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $145 with
interest.
Ole G. Menes VS. George Agcr, for trial.
John Gendreau vs.. Joseph p. Turner, settled.
John R. Mears VS.. Monitor Manufacturing
Co., for trial
Henry Dickinson vs.. E. I. Donovan, for trial
Allan Wilson VS.. John Kartes, Tried, verdict
for plaintiff in the sum of SIS.
William Hutton VS.. George L. Corey, for trial
James T. Tufts VS.. E. I. Donovan, for trial.
Austin Tomlinson & Webster Mfg. Co., VS.
D. H. Mcmillan, court case.
d. II. Mcmillan VS.. JAS. Conat ct al. for trial
Bank of Dresden VS.. David Rode ct al. settled
P. McHuSh VS.. Neil Larson, for trial.
George Nelson VS.. NJ. l.. Sullivan ct. al. for
trial.
F. Fl. Prossor VS.. B. R. Click, judgment
pending.
S. Torvalson vs.. Levy Rushford. continued.
A. Ct. Lentz vs. 6. S. Frcsen. for trial.
Fargo Storage and Transfer Co., VS.. Frank
Wrightson, for trial.
Fl. L. Helgeson VS.. Herman Hoppang Ell. al
continued.
S. Thorwoldson, administrator VS.. Lars
Hogan ct. al. continued.
H. B. Doughty VS.. Della P. jameson, for trial
Hugh Dougherty VS.. John Elliot, ST., ct. al
stipulation of facts to be submitted to court
State Of N. Oak, VS.. D. P. Jameson ct. al
court case.
State of n. Oak, VS.. Fred Wegley, for trial.
Kittel Braaten VS. Supervisors of Hope town
ship, Cavalier county, N. Oak, stipulation OF
facts to be submitted to the court.
James Semple vs.. James Kyle, settled.
w. Worthington VS.. James Black, stipula-
ton of facts to be submitted to the court.
James Brule VS.. Modiste Saborin, stricken
from the calendar.
The meeting of representatives of the
four counties interested in the opening
of the Fort Totten reservation passed
the following resolutions:
Whereas, North Dakota is universally
recognized as the bread basket of the