Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1900-09-19

b. I D. ID. 3D. #i La
] threatened Interruption from monte
which are moss giving 4. much ,.ro ,,J'' 70
looking t1 tus initiation of pslta 49,
uduous
10 is said That M. answer of oyr cos,
eminent .lHuu. BOD any CAS-. b.. 80
ready before tomorrow That fb. az
clsi0n arrived zoo today has not rharral
the military situation b. known NOM
the fact tAaf poo additional orders hoo
gone Co General ChaHae
,,,,,,...,...,.
'iI''lol Els n MUCH INTERPRETED
vy,gtt,....
vIr9 ne. -..' '1'' lt-Ailnister Wa
l'',,...,,' ''a 's sI,auy interested ia
,...,.i'i,s, -.'. 10 lha powers asking
49, "'.N lh "a demand that
Sii,. LOT ne trouble In
,., '.''', '.''...I a' an indispensable
tt5t '''''''i'' ". guy peace negotiations.
a,'N $50 roe legation be had be-
i1' nun d copy or the published text
81 que i'".,.
h. ''' ".' 1- "'iieNe ih4t this step
t2 ''n1"' etla ne, and II IL
I"', II ~ So uNI'i innate IN It's influence
- I'm .'g ,I..'"' question that l am
7't""' i' N'i.a Germany VIII recon-
S HE,, lug eoNIuvn IMPOSED upon
"4"n MYN'I amount 20 determining
S',' VI lil, SUBJECTS pi negotiation, be
Ky ",h "llA'.'As ha4 commenced. The
Dii"ese thl oss die invested with com-
p'..e ''Nel 10 make terms with the
P'"vie, 50 thai When the negotiations
aIt opened tnis question and all others
WIZ Dt proper subjects for cunsideIa-
,I'H anu -rueia' settlement by those
Ha'ihb complete authority TO deal With
lnein' but CO. take one subject in
ADVANCE, settle 10, and make It's eXecu-
uoh dh lhdIap -hsi0.e preliminary 10
negotiations ls extremely hard
SUI more ihau ms such cOndi-
Won, Ut imposed, ia simply impossible,
ana Delns impossible the effect would
ne 20 piins the peace negotiations 90
complete slahdsuiI. suppose the
SITUATION was reversed, ana this un-
Lni 'unate trouble BAD occurred 10 some
one OF the countries now dealing with
emma ia me midst OF extreme sus-
plclon 10 might have been directed
a5tlhst persons nigh IN authority even
against ihe members Of the royal fami-
~ ln mat country Would that coun-
Try, Mhen the question Of settlement
come up TOT moment consider the
surrender 0l those persons vaguely sus-
.eclea. OF would u not ask that All
questions Doc considered by the court
when WtH la pass upon the entire sub
Jetti Nh. .'lId ten To whom ttis COM
liuoh Ny tpply. Ihere nave been
lntlhl4 SlyA. 1s'Sisl those hlso M Ihl-
hese aIHlIs sNl u Woula be very Laid,
yes lmposslole' lo say ln advance ue-
loIe lHe hSsoualois haa considered the
question 'hoI lHese ptIhous shouil oe
proof? il Is an indispensa6is reaulsite
aceGIding 10 your recognized judicial
n'e sl'ous' tn"t pe5sols aCt USED nave tne
-nl W uv la'l, anu ela' lnell eN,-
us"-g sHu4 ue 'ancu mo 1lCouh. va
proving an accusation but according
20 lhls pIoposluoh hele would De
surrender OF tne party hlst, before the
H'boudl9ls htu an opportunity 70 CON
AQeI an questions oI proof Whleh
might ue presented
nGtf lhese circumstances am
most hopeiul that Geimanys note Is
less positive than the published reports
indicate recent indications nave
ueoh that the dllncuIil's over beginning
peace negotiations had been
overcome ana that very soon
lne negotiations would begin
would be ppfortpr5t. Fl, iTnoss ,', y com
diuon which being impossible would
bring the negotiations 20 halt. The
eHtcl OF such q step IN all proceedings
would De or disadvantage 90 al parties
concerned 20 me powers as well as 90
emma. IN short its ELECTS would ba SO
far reaching that ] am extremely anN-
ious that Germany may see her way
clear 20 reconsider the proposal
rNcr.AND srNDs ,,o pppry