Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1900-02-15
Mol So The Judg'

Afternoon Dlspa'0n'''
I...,,,ou. Feb. i5.-The Senate
l. ,,.. on elections today resumed
-. ~. ,o,o the election OF Senator
], yortana after a respite Of 50
y r,ssn the committee was called
developed that at least TWO
=, ,..,lses Of the Montana supreme
-, present. having been sum
,v,b4 committee to throw light
=. welcome disbarment trial
A., witness was Edward %.
n5ge Of the county court OF
..,.,o. county. New York who ties.
/, .,,,.rplng a conversation he haa
- York city last october with
u,,stt a witness for the prose-
ms case. He said Mr. Hewitt
.,,sss Of the Welcome disbarment
"A m response to an inquiry had
M, Welcome did not stand a
- . chance" and would be dis
"a He said that II did not make
sseynce whether Welcome was
q the oaeuse charged, as Daily
rl,s, court and the case was being
.,,,i with a view to getting testi-
tbe Clark case that was TO
s.ore the United States Senate
| ,ny people were, Hewitt was rep
49, % have said. determined to
| sncirk and would not stop at any
essgcompllsh the result
hrness also had expressed the
sn,asi Daily had put up the $4,000
v.hYr Whlteside In his exposure.
DISCRIMINATION Mr. Coyne said
n had known Mr.. Welcome So
NJ Before his examination was
xA.l8 Judge Coyne was excused
rrrly In order to permit the JUS
b 4 he Montana supreme court TO
s-t q order not TO detain them.
FAMILY DOCTOR DID 1T.
krs Hunts testimony created a
y I'd Impression. He detailed four
.sssi conversations he had had with
family physician. Dr. William
hay Of Helena. In two Of which he
gd the doctor had attempted 10
ioTe him a proposition TO bride
| \ d he Welcome disbarment case,
rA vas al that time before the
n d. which witness was a member.
= IN o. these conversations had oc-
n. % the jih OF last August. in Mr..
afy' office al the invitation Of the
b..
Wen went 10 MS Office" said the
,a 'Dr Tracey invited me 10 a
= nom. He said i have a funny
:. q q PROPOSITION which has come
81 you"
D sector then went on 10 tell, &C.
.ts 10 Judge Hunts statement, thar
Y. ioeior) was taking an interest
F. y Welcome case, which he said he
.|s'ood was not like ordinary cases
PEN He had been told. he said,
I. y vas largely a matter In the dis
--a o. The members of the court,
-t'lhg that he understood the dis
90 proceedings TO be a political
eA Algely, and adding that while he
: % y, khow Nr Welcome, he under
~ may he was a decent fellow.
' ~ Hunt said that he had replied
4, |. hl' 70 the effect that while there
I. certain amount Of legal discre-
I, fsimltled the case would have TO
!. ", rs eoure Just as any other case.
unset let that Il was a painful
y. Y BECAUSE he knew Mr.. Welcomes
~, ,s.-ulu and altogether he would
I. Az. S,old i II he could. DR.. Tracey
!. !. Na 10 him, according to the wit.
i. ,' ',nt suppose then there is,any
'Ay my proposition before you"
OFFERED toooOo
M, al. ~, however waiting for any
I, y s'sDiy' The witness said the doc
r. -. Proceeded as follows:
y M Y party here who has got
\. ... aul Who wants to put Il up N
j',,'.s ~ can BE- thrown out OF court "
.-.l, $50 hunt said that he was not
! s,. whether Dr. Tracey had used
s,iiSss.A'ssf or plural pronoun In
M y. y, y. he pafty-'not sure wheth-
ID T.. nun SAID that he had replied
Ilta i,sgsY mat not all the money
IA ,c. 1,sl states and Anaconda
N sss -g 9dr win every dollar that
N N.Y.. Nv arg are both worth and
!. ny - Is 10 The banks. would in.
} ,r,s., " sacrifice my conscience TO
M 7, " granting additional time
h CAS- 'll. other case. The Well
h et.s must go forward inst az
l,, sAti case would" '"'' az
\, 49,. ,si Hunt said he had gone 70 HE
stsy IA 'i'al in the afternoon DIR
.ri, "a, nal came 10 his house ana
g,5.s s,g,neI Interview. saving that
hi br,,. that one OF the supreme
q M ~ haa been secured In IA
NV 'Is Proposition. which bad nr ="
N "a made 70 this Justioe
{ blIeyo y, had replied that he ana
~ bo,h' III y, 70 be true as ne con.
:. roB,o .si,oe' M Piggott, men be-
-. 'sls Dr. Tracey hos 81,
.'.slsi n y ,' DION from his pocket and
y rl,ls. ,sad from il a memoran-
isr,ood ,. suai he tthe doctorl hed
b h.elss,,.nai Mr DAILY had assured
~ Hus,, M ., o. The justice. To his
DIV Ss1 sara he had replied tha,
n NJ addN sser assured him Of any
~ N, s, -s-su hat Nj. DAILY had on
Y r'asop ,l, election and that tbe
u ss,. D lor suDposlng that he ana ma
n. I, NV on good term. -
s.'ss v. .s lac, iset that some Of their r
WY Intimate, After this