The Republican., 1900-11-15
Edward H. Slncell, Solicitor, Oakland, Md
Order Of Publication.

Calvin Anderson VS.. Arthur p Amick, in
FAINT, and George W. W. Amick.
No. 1O74 Equity in the Circuit Court for Gar
rett County, Maryland.
The object of this suit is to procure de
cree for the sale of certain real estate. stu
ate in Garrett county, Maryland, and for
division of the proceeds thereof according
to their respective interests, between the
parties to this suit.
The bill states that on the third day of
February, 1859, the State of Maryland granted
unto certain John Phillips tract of land
called mount Cenis,'' containing 265 5-l6
acres, lying now in Garrett county, and
certified copy of the patent for said land is
exhibited with the bill; that being seized and
possessed of said land, said Phillips departed
this life about the year 1869, inteState, leav
ing surviving him, as his only heirs at law, a
certain Elizabeth Phillips, his widow, who
was entitled to a dover interest in said land,
but has since departed this life, and the fol-
lowing named children: J. Lee Phillips,
son, who died, intestate, unmarried and
without issue; Ella Phillips, a daughter, who
also d.ed, inteState, unmarried and without
issue Florence Phillips, a daughter, who in
termarried with the defendant, George w.
W. Amick, but who has since departed this
| life inteState, leaving surviving her son,
the said defendant, Arthur p. Anick, and
the said George W. W. Amick, her husband,
and Minnie Phillips a daughter, who inter
| married with certain ThaddeuS c. Hine-
baugh.
The bill further states that upon the death
of the said Elizabeth Phillips, }. Lee Phillips,
Ella Phillips, the title to the above named
tract of land became vested to the extent of
an undivided one-haf interest in the said
| Arthur ?. Amick, subject to a life estate in
the said George W. W. Amick, and the other
| undivided one-half interest in the said Min
| ME Phillips Hinebaugh, who with her huS-
band conveyed the same to the plaintiff by
| deed dated the fifteenth day of August, 1870,
| and exhibited with the bill, so that the plain
| tiff and the said Arthur 2. Amick, whose eS-
| tate is qualified by the aforesaid life estate,
are seized as tenants in common in fee OF
| said land.
The bin further states that it will be for
the interest and advantage of all the parties
| to sell said land, the same not being SuScepti-
! bic of partition without material loss and in
| jury, and to divide the proceeds between the
| parties according to their respective inter
ests. but the said Arthur P. Amick is an in
| fant under the age of twenty-one years, and
| the plaintiff is advised that sale cannot be
had without the assistance of this Court.
| The bill then prayS that the defendants
| may answer the premises; for decree for
| the sale of said land and distribution of the
proceeds in proportion to the respective in
| tereSts of the parties, and for general relief,
| and an order of publication against the said
defendants, who are non-residents of this
| State, giving notice of the object and sub
stance of said bill, and warning them to ap-
pear in this Court on or before certain day
| to answer the premises and show cause, if
| any they have, why a decree ought not to
! pass as prayed
1t is thereupon ordered this sixth day of
| November, 1900, by the Circuit Court for Gar
rett county, sitting in Equity, that the plain
! tiff by causing a copy of this order to be in
| serted in some newspaper published in Gar
| rett county once in each of four successive
weeks before the 4th day of December, 1900
| give notice to the said absent defendants of
| the object and substance OF this bill, warn
| ing them to appear in this Court in person
| or by solicitor on or before the 10th day of
| December next, to show cause, if any they
have, why decree ought not to be passed
| as prayed.
E. Il. TOWER, Clerk.
| True Copy-teSt:
f. Il. TOWER Clerk.