The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1900-12-20

OF notes for definite amounts. 1t may be shown
that it is simply one of indemnity. or fol- future
promissory note by the indorsee. taken without
Endorsement, an answer of no consideration Is
1925. Chicago & Erie Railroad Company VS..
Thomas. Huntington c. G. Reversed Bowling.
the killing of a person where is shown that, the
decedent left a widow and son, which are both
and Infant were entitled to the services Of the
deceased, and that such services were valuable
t. both, and such ~presumptions are sufficient TO
sustain a complaint against a demurrer WHEN
a person attempts to cross railroad tracks where
extraordinary perils exists he must exercise ex-
eSaG account Of Saf the killing Of a person at a rail-
road crossing plaintiff must show that his de-
sede1t was Tree from SohiriDet0ry yr la1it fb shq ne epa.
1884. Frazee VS.. Dale. Rush c. c. dismissed
Minutes
1854. John H. Frazee ct al. VS.. Charles F..
Dale ct al Rush {. Appellants dismissal.
1898. Sarah A. Miller VS.. David A; Coulter ct
1856. Curtis ]. Judd ct al. VS.. Jennie A. Gray.
Pulaski c. c. Appellee's petition. etc. 90
APPELLATE COURT.
Company. Clark c. c. Affirmed. Black. Ill.
When a pleading is struck out or rejected IT. will
Isss e saved by b bar. of EXCEPTIONS tfoDsu or order ID Of court.
2. Interrogatories propounded to a party. filed
less properly made such by bill OF exceptions or
ssis. /. .. & W. Railroad Company vs.. Gaus,
han, Henry c. G; Reyersed; Henley; c; LIN ,nn
the complaint to show a legal duty or obligation
of the defendant towards the plaintiff existing at
PENDANT failed to perform, and that plaintiffs in
jury was occasioned by such failure.
Minutes
343e. William Adams VS.. Jasper Bullock. Knox
G. c. Return TO certiorari.
da sSsSI c william sn1 fsim Hines Com ct al, Vi aa The So1 rs q
Appellants' reply brief Cd
SH2. Andrew NJ. Orr VS.. William III. feathers.
Ss s5is. Indiana Stone sP9ei'f Railroad d Company VS.. Will
liam Strain. Owen c. c. Appellee's brief 6l
N sass: YORK rRe vs. ri Joseph Mo n. T 6crSaans wayne NG1PeNcs Z. G.
Petition for extension of time granted.
SUPERIOR COURT.
Room John L. McMaster. Judge.
Indiana Insurance Company VS.. Carrie r.
Campfeld: foreclosure. Finding and Judgment
for rlaintin against defendant for s~2.755.s7 and
Charles II. McCarty VS.. Louis A. Kinsey: dam
ages. Jury out
Room Flames NJ. feathers. Judge.
Carrie Easley VS.. Hiram p. WATSON: damages.
Frank l.. Evans VS.. James Haslinger ct al.
Dismissed at plaintiffs cost.
Catherine Campbell VS.. c., c., C.. & st. L.
Railway ct al; damages. Finding and judg-
ment against defendant for $1,000 and costs.
Room 3-vinson Carter. Judge.
William S. Demott VS.. indianapolis Street-rail-
way Company; damages. On trial by jury.
COURT.
Henry Clay Allen, Judge.
John II. Murphy VS.. National Meter Company;
on contract. Trial resumed. Additional evidence
heard.
John L.. McMaster, Special Judge.
Charles II: McCarty VS.. Louis A. ,Kinsey; Sian
der. Submitted to jury. Evidence heard In part.
CRIMINAL COURT.
Fremont Afford, Judge.
William Mallady; murder. Jury out.
NEW SUITS FILED
Thomas Gibbs VS.. Minnie Gibbs; divorce. su-
perior Court. Room J.
State of Indiana ex rel. John C. Ruckels-
haus VS.. Fraternal Cooperative Association: for
the appointment Of a receiver. Superior Court,
Room 3.
Carrie Kicks VS.. The Indianapolis Street-rail-
way Company; damages. Demand, 10, 900. SUI
perior Court, Room 2.
Margaret Dehorney VS.. John T. Dehorney; d.
yorce. Circuit Court.