The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1900-11-01
THE COURT RECORD.
SUPREME COURT.


c. c. Reversed. Monks. il When a court
Jurisdiction of the particular case depends upon
a fact or facts which to be tried and deter
erroneous is not void. but is conclusive against
collateral attack z The fact that an o1ense
formation actually committed in county
other than the alleged does not affect the
the and the has co aae
ton 10 require recognizance on the part OF
the defendant for his appearance; and the fact
that the crime was committed in another county
II no defense to an action on the reeognl-sn L
judicial notice of the and signatures OF
their ofh S !: The sureties upon , reeog-
and are liable for his nonappearance.
1880. Weston Paper Company VS.. Pope.
Shelby c. c. Petition for rehearing overruled
Minutes
1888. Glenn Dillingham; ct al VS.. Condie NJ.
Parks ct al. Marshall c. c. Additional copies
1ssi7. Margaret gaars - Moren VS.. David Morell.
Huntington c. c. Appellants brief 60
Buck ct On Greene q q Ap s bref
:. lsaig. The ,Pittsburg. Cincinnati. Chicago g
Malcher ct al. Laporte c. c. Appellants aft
davits. Petition for Injunction refused.
APPELLATE COURT.
S0S1 Hollis VS.. Roberts: Madison c. c. At
answer in bar because lit does not state facts
sents no question 2 Where the record fails to
show that the trial court made any ruling upon
sented The 10 prPecpe FOR ht the reeopd on ap
peal should be appended to the transcript.
randolph niSa Guy Affirmed I c0 BlaeR g 9hi:
court cannot decide questions not presented by
the record. e. To entitie instructions. which
were given and excepted TO. which were
asked and refused. 10 receive consideration they
must be properly in the record 3. To question
the correctness of the court In suppressing IN
terrogatories an exception to the courts ruling
must be saved by bill of exceptions. 4. Rule
80 Of this court requires marginal notes to be
made in the bill of exceptions. 5. Rules of the
and parties and counsel must obey them. 6.
Where the transcript does not show with GER
upon the action of the trial court in overruiing
appellants motion for judgment in his favor
upon the special finding. Notwithstanding the
general verdict, upon the question as to the
sufficiency of the evidence, or upon the action
of the court in giving or in refusing to give
certain instructions.
Minutes
1888. Charles l. Knoupf VS.. the City OF Lo-
transport. Cass c. c. Appellants additional
rS SiSs The pttsbgrg Cincinnati Chicago St
clarke wa Appeiies gsp BRIEF rs John AidFdse
. So26. Andrew u. Fisher VS.. Glenn Peak. Sui
Sn Leo Go fo6potn D minor by next friend
VS.. the Corning Steel Company. Lake C. q
S2OS. Eliza A Flanagan VS. Joseph III. Pet-
mer Cass c. c. Appellants points for oral
$s5s Wabash Railroad Company VS. Sebastian
Miller. Adams C. c. Appellants reply brief.
SUPERIOR COURT.
Room John l.. McMaster, Judge.
Marcus Lewis VS.. Louis Kamnsky ct al me-
chanics lien. Finding and judgment for Maxey
and Burnett their complaint against
Louis Kaminsky for $751; so. Finding for de-
PENDANT kaminsky complaint and other cross
complaints
Room 3-Vinson Carter, Judge.
Nora Couson Home Benefit Association.
jury returned verdict for plaintiff for s50.74.
Henry 5. Doran l.. T.. and w. II. r. Co.
damages. Plaintiff dismissed cause
Margaret j. Culbertson Jessie Annie Roe
ct al to reform deed and quiet title. Finding
for plaintiff. Deed reformed and title quieted.
Judgment against plaintiff for costs
NEW SUITS FILED.
Edward j. Mahoney VS.. Hattie H. Knight;
mortgage foreclosure. Superior Court Room g
q. George krug VS.. Agatha Bucher Islander
and damages. Demand, $1,000. Circuit Court.
Margaret Wave VS.. David A Wave ct al ;
support. Circuit Court.
German Building Association of Indiana VS..
Ellen Leary ct al; mortgage foreclosure. SUI
perior Court, Room 3.