The evening times. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1895-1902, 1900-11-12
ISSTES.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT
OF COLUMBIA Holding a Special Term for

ISSIES
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT
OF COLUMBIA Holding a Special Term for
Orphans Court BUziReSs--In re Estate Of
Francis S obold- No ez32- Adm Doc. %.
Upon consideration Of the czveat fled herein
BY James P 0bold TO the PAPER writings dated
the sixth day OF August, 1883, and the sixth day
Of February 1896, and offered for probate a. the
last viii and testament and codicil thereto Of
the said Francis s. obold, and OF the answer OF
Charles n Oh d, Sarah J. 0boId, and Annie c.
DOYLE Tuohy 10 said caveat II Is By the court this
Dist day Of September. 1900, ordered that the
following issues be set for trial by jury IN
this court, to Wit:
J. Was the said paper writing bearing cate
August G. 1855, and supporting TO be the last viii
and testament OF the said Francis 5. oeold exc
cutei BY him in manner required by law to pass
personal estateI
3 was the said paper writing dated August s,
1855 purporting 10 be the last viii and testament
of said Francis s obold. executed by him in
manner required BIZ law TO pass real estate?
8 Was the said Francis s 0boId at the time
sid paper writing dated August s, 1855 was
executed of sound mind, capable OF making I
valid deed contract?
= was the execution by said Francis s Obold
Of said paper writing dated August 6, 1885,
procured by the fraud or deceit OF any person
5. was the execution by said Francis s OboId
OF said paper writing dated August 6, 1855, pro
cured by the exercise OF undue influence said
Francis s 0bold by any person or persons?
6was the said paper writing bearing date
February 6, 1895, and purporting TO be a codici
TO the said paper writing dated August 8, ISIS
executed by the said Francis s 0bold in manner
required By law to pass personal estate?
Z Was the said paper writing bearing date Feb
r,iary g. 1896, and puTpoLting TO be codicii Il
the said paper writing dated August 6. 1855
executed BY the said Francis s 0bold IN manner
REQUIRED By law to pass real estate?
s Was the said Francis s 0bold at the tinS
said paper writing bearing date February 6, 1895
was executed of sound mind, capable OF making
a valid deed OF coRtractf
g. Was the execution by the said Francis s
OboId Of said pzper writing bearing date Feb
Tuary 6, 1896, procured by the fraud or deceit
Of any person or persons?
10 Was the execution by the said Francis S
obold Of said paper writing bearing date Feb
ruary s. 1895, procured by the exercise Of undui
influence over the said Francis S. obold by AM
person or personsf CHAS- c COLE, J.
oc22. moB&thCs-St
| Filled Nov. 8. 1907. R. YOUNG, Clerk
| IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT
OF COLUMBIA. THE Sd DAY OF NOyEM
Der. 19O0-ARTHUR CHAINES vs.. ANNII
| CHAIMES- No. 1890 Eq Docket As
On motion OF the plaintiff, by Wolf & Roseu
| berg. his solicitors, it is ordered that the de
| fendent Annie Chaimes, cause her appearance
! to be entered herein on or before the first ruli
| day occurring forty days after this day; other
/ wise the cause viii be proceeded with as il
case Of default
| The object Of this suit Is to obtain an abso
| lutte divorce from the defendant on the GROUND
/ OF her adultery
This order to be published once a week TO
1 three consecutive weeks in the washington
| Law Reporter and The Washington Times.
| lseaD E.F, BINGHAM. CHIEF Justice, etc
True copy-Test:
| ] R YOUNG, Clerk, etc.
By NJ A CLANCY, Asst Clerk
nos, .19