The daily morning journal and courier. [volume] (New Haven, Conn.) 1894-1907, 1900-09-05

FANNIE WILLIAMS
Wedding, to foreelosa note of $1,000
/ dated July 5, 1889.
George d. Watrous trustee, VS.. Ches-
ter w. Clark to foreclose mortgage OF
$1,000, dated October 10, 1890, on prop
erty in County street.
Harriet L. Tompkms VS.. Coils M. ia
cobs ct al, to foreclose mortgage of
s., 900, dated April /, 1887, on property
in Grafton street.
Anna M, Thompson, ct al, eXecutrix,
VS. Louis Ticotsky, ct al, to foreclose
mortgage of $4,000, dated December 16,
1896, on property in Lafayette street.
A. d. Sugarman vs. Maria Ross, to
foreclose a mortgage Of $1,000, dated
February "a, 1899, on properties in Oak
street and Hill street.
TWENTY NINE DIVORCES.
Twenty-nine suits for divorce are en-
tered for the September term Of the SUI
parior court. There are twenty-five wo-
men and seven men as plaintiffs. The
cases are:
Elizabeth A, Smith VS.. Frederick B.
Smith; allegat ton, adultery and intol-
cradle cruelty; married October 4, 1879;
three children.
Emma E. Ives VS.. George G, Ives
allegation, intolerable cruelty, married
June 10, 1883,
James b. Lee vs. Martha Bradley
Lee; allegation, desertion; married
April 5, 1856.
Carrie A. Beeman VS.. Wesley f. Bee
man; allegation. intolerable cruelty;
married April IA, 1897.
Isabel II. Corning VS. Cornelius M,
Corning; allegation, habitual intemper-
ance and intolerable cruelty; married
January II, 1876.
Sarah E. Garloch vs.. Charles p. Gar
loch; allegation, total neglect of all the
duties of the marriage covenant; mar
ried April IS, 1883.
Kate Hayes VS.. John Hayes; alleea-
ton, intolerable cruelty; married Feb
ruary ", 1878,
+ Burton ~ Blatchley vs.. Nellie Batch
ley; allegation, adultery; married Sep
TENDER 6, 1893.
Alice NJ, Bryant vs.. Frederick A. Bry
ant; allegation total neglect of mar
riage covenant; married October IS,
1898
Mabel ]. Cooper vs. Clarence w Coo
per; allegation, deserton; married Au-
gust q, 1899.
Emile Betrix VS.. Mary l.. Betrix, al
legation, intolerable cruelty; married
March a. 1900.
Mary Maher VS.. John Maher allega-
ton, intolerable cruelty and habitual in
married August Is, 1888.
Daisy II. Weaver VS.. Wilbur Fl.
Weaver; allegation. desertlon; married
July IS, 1894.
Annie Walkley VS. Cahey Walkley;
intolerable cruelty; married
October %, 1890. 90
Sarah Ann Buckley VS.. Patrick ],
Buckley; allegation. habitual intemper-
ance and intolerable cruelty; married
August IA, 1861
Della b. Mullen vs.. John Mullen; al
legation, habitual intemperance and in
cruelty; married october "a,
1884 fU0
Louisa Merrill futile VS.. Milo Day
ton futile; allegation, habitual intem-'
perance; married June l. 1864.
Emily Leete VS.. John w, Leete; ale
cation, desertion; married February l,
1896
John j. Mautte VS.. Nellie Mautte; al
legation, adultery; married April 80,
1892
Hattie M. Talcott VS. Addison II. Tai
,ott; allegation, habitual intemperance;
married October 1e, 1895.
Nellie l.. Roy. VS.. Hamilton r. Roy;
desertion; married April 26,
1896
NJ Franklin Phelan VS. Ida j. Phelan,
adultery; married April rs,
1887.
Pauline j. Lowenstein VS.. Henry
allegation, intolerable cru
elty; married July g. 1876.
Emma Monahan vs.. Thomas II. Mon
lhan; allegation desertion; married
December 80. 1891.
Lester l. Beers VS.. Ida A. Beers; al
egation, desertion; married March 2,
500.
Oscar C. Brown VS.. Alice A. Brown;
desertion married August 5,
S75.
Lillian $. Clifford VS.. Eugene A. Gift
ord; allegation, desertion; married Au-
rust H. 1856.
Watkins Goodwin vs.. Carrie Good |
win; allegation intolerable cruelty and
labituaI intemperance; married May 8,
9S4.
Frank c. Hall VS.. Emma NJ. Hall; |
desertion; married June rs,
1896
Elizabeth l.. Maley VS. Andrew A,
IaleY: alienation. hahltunl intemper- |