The Leon reporter. (Leon, Iowa) 1887-1930, 1900-08-16
FOUR REPUBLICAN CONTENTIOUS.


ency.
FOUR REPUBLICAN CONTENTIOUS.
Comment ON the Principal Arguments. OF
the Party In Power.
The principal arguments, however,
advanced by those who enter upon
defense Of imperialism are:
First: That we must improve the
present opportunity to become world
power and enter iuto international pol
itics.
Second. That our commercial inter-
ests in the Philippine islands and in
the Orient make it necessary for us to
hold the islands permanently.
Third: That the spread of the Chris
tian religion will be facilitated by a
colonial policy.
Fourth: That there Is no honorable
retreat from the position which the
nation has taken.
The first argument is addressed to
the nations pride and the second to the
nations pocket-book. The third is in
tended for the church member and the
fourth for the partisan.
1t is sufficient answer to the first
argument to say that for more than a
century this nation has been a world
power. For ten decades it has been
the most potent influence in the world.
Not only has it been world power,
but it has done more to affect the poll
tics of the human race than all the 9th
er nations of the world combined. Be-
cause our Declaration of Independence
was promulgated others have been pro-
mulgated; because the patriots of 1776
fought for liberty others have fought
for it; because our constitution was
adopted other constitutions have been
adopted. The growth of the principle
of selfgovernment, planted on Ameri-
can soil, has been the r-shadowing
political fact of the nineteenth cen
tury.
The permanent chairman of the last
Republican national convention pre-
Tits badness, when he said: I'VE make
no hypocritical pretenses of being
| interested in the Philippines solely on
account of others. While we regard the
welfare OF these people as q sacred
trust we regard the Welt SQf the
American people sarst We. S&lufv
to ourselves az well as to otsll -
believe In trade expansion. Z, ls
legitimate means within the
| of government and constitutf
mean to stimulate the expansS
our trade and open new ~
| This Is the commerclS, :, ID nlarkets
| is has,d .vAat sls1sH argument. IL
lA 4zaToh the theory that war
can De rightly waged for pecuniary
advantage, and that it is profitable to
purchase trade by force and violence.
Franklin denied both Of these prOpo-
sitiOns.
l place the philosophy of Franklin
against the sordid doctrine of those
who would put a price upon the life
Of an American soldier and Justify a
war of conquest upon the ground that
it will pay. The Democratic party is
in favor Of the expansion of trade 1t
would extend our trade by every legiti-
mate and peaceful means; but it is not
willing to make merchandise of human
blood.
But war of conquest is as unwise
as it is unrighteous. A harbor and
coaling station in the Philippines
would answer every trade and mill
tary necessity and such concession
could have been secured at any time
without difficulty.
1t is not necessary to own people in
order to trade with them. We carryt
on trade today with every part of the
ed more rapidly than the commerce of
any European empire. When
trade is secured by force, the cost of
securing it and retaining it must be
taken out.of the profits, and the profits
are never large enough to cover the ex-
pense. Such system would never be
defended, but for the fact that the ex-
pense is borne by all the people, while
the profits are enjoyed by the few.
Imperialism would be profitable to
the army contractors; it would be prof
table ito the ship-owners, who would
carry live soldiers to the Philippines
and bring dead soldiers back; it would
be profitable to those who would seize
upon the franchises, and it would be
profitable to the officials whose salaries
would be fixed here and paid over
there; but to the farmer, to the labor
ing man, and to the vast majority of
those engaged in other occupations, it
would bring expenditure without re-
turn and risk without reward.
Farmers and laboring men have. as
rule, small incomes and under sys-
tens which places the tax upon CON
sumption pay more than their fair
share of the expenses of government
Thus the very people who receive LEAST
benefit from imperialism will be in
jured most by the military burdens
which accompany it. *** It is
not strange, therefore, that the labor
organizations have been quick to note
the approach of these dangers and
+ prompt to protect against both mllitar.
ism and Imperialism.
The pecuniary argument, though
more effective with certain classes, is
not likely to be used so often or pre-
sented with SO much emphasis as the
religious argument. II what has been
termed the ''gunpowder gospel" were
urged against the Filipinos only 1t
would be sufficient answer to say
that majority of the Filipinos are
now members of one: branch Of the
Christian church, but the principle in
volyed is one of much wider applica-
tion and challenges serious considera-
ton.
We cannot approve of this doctrine
In one place unless we are willing to
apply it everywhere. II there is poison
in the bloodof the hand twill ultimate
" reach the heart. 1t is equally true
that fOrcible Christianity, il planted
under the American flag in the far
away Orient illsu0nnor or lo+or ha