The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1900-12-13


case is affirmed upon authority of international
etc. Association VS.. Wall, 13 Ind. 54.
1854. Bateman VS.. Bennett. Warrick c. c.
Dismissed
1917. Mark VS.. North. Delaware C. C. Petit
tion for rehearing overrulsd.
Minutes
1885. Woodfori L. Woods VS.. Indiana Mutual
Building and Loan Association. No. 5. Knox ..
1915. The Citisens street-railroad Company
VS.. Raymond j. Hamer. Marion S. c. Appel
az is45i. pe j. Marsh Z Wilson nrs vs.. State of Indiana.
shelby {. c. Showing by attorney general.
pl ls3Ss- adm,E;.,T p, Davis N. Ct al VS. Je snns
lants' reply to appellee's additional brief.
COURT.
1922. Burford vs.. Dukes. Montgomery S. C..
Affirmed. Black, III. Where no objection to
of the court in overruling a demurrer thereto
is waived. 2. That 1.-The finding and Judgment"
Of the court in favor OF the appellee ON the
counter claim is contrary to law, and that the
finding and judgment Of the court in favor Of
the appellee on the counter claim us contrary 10
the evidence are not causes fer a new trial. as
recognized by statute. 3. To make motions to
retax costs and to modify the Judgment parts
OF the record by order of court, instead OF by
Dill OF exceptions, they must be set out in
their order.
1912. Peoples State Bank VS.. Jones. Washing
ton c. c. Reversed. Comstock, il An an
sWer TO a suit upon a promissory note that the
latter was given for a patent right. to be good
under Section 6o55, X. S. 1881, must aver facts
showing that the consideration in whole or in
part for which the note was given was a patent
right, or a right claimed TO be q patent right. 2.
An answer that said notes were executed in
consideration for the sale and transfer to him
by one - and the - company of the ex-
elusive right and privilege of selling for use OF
certain portable pantries In Warren county. In
diana, until the 1st day of January, 1888" shows
that the consideration thus alleged is only the
transfer Of the exclusive right TO sell a manu-
featured article, a tangible thing for q limited
time in a particular territory.
SiSs. Adams VS.. Bullock. Knox c. c.. Ger
tiorari granted and issued.
1927. Trethaway VS.. Peck. Yanderburg S. e.
Motion to dismiss overruled.
Minutes
1866. Edward Toner ct al. VS.. Frank l.. wag-
ner. administrators. Marshall e. c. Appellants
SUPERIOR COURT.
Room 1-John L. McMaster, Judge.
Charles Blondell vs. United States Express
Room FLAMES NJ. feathers. Judge
Andrew Lyon ct al. VS.. Sarah Carringer ct al /;
foreclosure. Dismissed as to Edward Carringer.
Jury returned verdict for plaintiff.
Frank Holland VS.. Lake Erie & Western Rail-
way Company; damages. On trial by jury.
Room s-vinson Carter. Judge.
Daniel w. Warmon VS.. James S. HolloweIl ct
al; foreclosure. Judgment on special finding
S. and Sally Hollowell for si.SSs and costs. Judg-
ment against defendant James S. Hollowell for
City of indianapolis VS.. Frank Brown: appeal.
Motion TO dismiss cause sustained. Judgment
against plaintiff for costs.
Nicholas Hofbauer VS.. Citizens Street-rail-
road Company; damages. On trial by jury.
Henry Clay Allen, Judge.
Louisa Hess, executrix, VS.. indianapolis Brew
ing Company; damages. Defendant enters ap-
pearance and valves issuance and summons of
process. Submitted to court. Finding for plain
tsh. Judgment against defendant for $500 and
costs.
Amos W.. Reagan and Richard S. Camplin APP
pointed jury commissioners for year 1901.
CRIMINAL COURT.
Fremont Afford, Judge.
Jessie Bryant; keeping house of i'll fame. APP
peal from City Court. Finding guilty. Fine SO
and Imprisonment in the county Jail ten days.
Julia Wilson,; prostitution. Appeal from City
Court. Finding guilty. Fine IS.
Orange Young; grand larceny. Plea of guilty
to petit larceny. Sentenced to state prison for
one to three years.
Arthur Stanley; assault and battery. Appeal
from City Court. Finding not guilty.
NEW SUITS FILED.
John G.. Galloway VS.. Parry Manufacturing
Company; damages. Demand, 5000. Superior
Court. Room 2.
Mamie Green VS.. Railway Ofhcials' and EN-
ployes' Accident Association; on policy. SUI
perior Court, Room 1.
Jacob Miller VS.. Republic Chemical Creosoting
Company; mechanics lien. Superior Court,
Daisy p. Viking VS.. Otto viking; divorce.
Circuit Court.