Cañon City record., 1900-09-27
SELF GOVERNMENT
WHO ARE ENTITLED TO IT. AND
WHO ARE NOT.
An Atle Analysis of Mr.. Bryan's Theoreti-
cal Doctrines, and Practical Proposals
by the Editor of the American Monthly
Review of Reviews.
Ap,ot-.,s Pushed to Extremes.

allow any group of men, whether In
county, in town, or in school district,
to set themselves up as an independent
government. The states rights men at
least understood the fact that sover-
eighty had to reside somewhere, If
there was to be any government at all;
and they went no farther back in their
analysis than the states which were
the constituent members of the Fed
eral Union 1t does not seem to us nee
essary to attempt to set the American
people into contending camps over the
mere metaphysics of the inherent
rights of man. When one takes indi-
yiduals and cross-examines them, one
finds that there is not shade of diff
ference between Republicans and Dem
ocrats on the theoretical question of
the desirability of intelligent self-gov-
ernment everywhere. 1t just happens,
however that at the present moment
Mr.. Bryan's friends throughout the
South are engaged in the practical task
of depriving of selfgovernment nearly
half of the entire Southern population,
on the ground that participation in gov
ernment is not, in fact, an inherent
human right, but that the object of
government is the high and true well
fare of the community. and that only
those people should participate in the
tasks of government who are suffi-
ciently intelligent and responsible 1t
does not seem to us that the real ques-
ton at stake in the Philippines is met,
or even approached, by eloquent expo
sitions based upon glittering general
fties about the inalienable rights of
man.
As to Getting Philippine Harbor.
The real and practical question is,
What is best to do, for everybody con-
cerned, in serious and critical situa-
ton? Mr.. Bryan devotes many col
umns to abstract and lofty argument,
with impressive quotations from Amer
lean statesmen of an earlier day and
from the holy Scriptures. He gives
only few lines to telling Us what he
would really have done in the Philip
pine matter IL he had been in author
ity. In the first place, he says: "A
harbor and coaling station in the Phil
fppines would answer every trade and
military necessity; and such conces-
sion could have been secured, at any
time, without difficulty" This could
hardly mean anything except the har-
Dor of Manila, the one Important CEN
ter of Philippine trade. If we could,
without difficulty" have secured this
from the Filipinos, 1t surely would not
have been because the Filipinos were
at heart willing to give away their
best possession. If they were to be
allowed a real freedom of action as an
independent government, who is there
that supposes for moment that they
would have given us the harbor of
Manila? Mr.. Bryan in this speech, as
we'll as In others, constantly likens the
attitude of the American people to-
ward the Filipinos to that of a high
wayman committing robbery with vio-
lence, But his descent from the ideal
to the practical is not altogether felicit-
GUS. His suggestion is, to quote his
exact words, that "a war of conquest
is as unwise as it is unrighteous." The
unwisdom lies in the fact that we do
not need the whole thing, and that we
might have got the valuable harbor,
which is all we need for commercial
and naval purposes, without entering
upon a war Of conquest. In other
words, the wise highwayman would
make a gentlemanly compromise with
his grateful victim by accepting his
gold watch as present. and would al
low the traveller to pass on with his
horse, his pocketbook and his loose
change. If Mr.. Bryan's suggestion
means anything at ALL it would seem to
mean this and nothing else.
Mr.. Bryan's Solution.
Toward the end OF his speech Mr..
Bryan comes to what he calls ian easy,
honest, honorable solution of the Phil
ippine question" 1t involves three
points:
First, TO establish stable form of
government in the Philippine islands.
Second, to give independence to the
Filipinos.
Third, to protect the Filipinos from
outside interference while they work
out their destiny"
The first of these propositions goes
fatty counter to the elaborate theoret-
ical argument which occupies nearly all
the space of Mr.. Bryan's speech. If,
indeed the Filipinos possess, as he af-
firms, the absolute right to govern
themselves, then we can have no busi-
ness to stablish stable government,
or any other kind OF government,
among them. Aguinaldo and his fol-
lowers have asserted all along that
they are eminently capable of estab-
fishing their own government, and that
our business is simply to clear out.
1ne administration at Washington,
and Judge Taft's commission now in
the Philippines. made up Of Demo-
crats and Republicans alike, are at this