The McCook tribune. (McCook, Neb.) 1886-1936, 1900-11-23
District Court Proceedings.

htOIiudS U.IlOllduu vs.. UOnD II I1elIll,
injunction by agreement.
Frederick Passenger VS.. Frank p.
Allen ct uX., equity.
ID. w. G.. Beck VS.. Solomon Premier ct
al, confirmation; by agreement.
John r. Helm VS.. Leonidas j. Hol-
land, appeal by agreement.
John F. Helm VS.. William II. Moore,
appeal by agreement.
Henry II. Beatty VS.. William Colling
ct al, confirmation.
George l.. Mesker ct al. VS.. Masonic
Temple association, mechanics lien.
Ferdinand Vering VS.. A. J. Pelhord
ct al, equity.
Nebraska Loan and Trust Co. VS..
Charles Ebert ct al, confirmation.
Beatrice Creamery Co. VS.. Joseph S.
McBrayer, appeal.
Lizzie Barnan VS.. Henry Barnan,
divorce.
Margaret Bachelor VS.. Lizzie Batch
ellor, equity.
j. E. Seeley VS.. William H. Eifert ct
al, equity.
CONTRIBUTIONS.
State Bank of Indianola VS.. jeremiah
| III. Warfield ct al, present sheriff to ex-
ecute deed.
Jennie Bush VS.. George A. Hobson
ct al.
Joseph T. Murtagh VS.. Mary S. Eaton
ct al.
Phebe E. Boyd ct al. VS.. Loyal M.
Hayes ct al, judgment for 1903. 40.
Rachel Knox VS.. William Pate ct al,
judgment for S116.18.
Walter E. Corwin VS.. Robert. T. Allan
ct al.
Walter E. Corwin VS.. James N. Becker
ct al.
James Pardee VS.. Katie E. Phillips
ct al.
In the matter of the estate of Leo M.
Simpson, license to sell.
In the matter of the estate of John
Kolb, insane, all parties allowed until
November 18th, 1900, to file objections.
Nebraska Loan and Trust Co. VS..
John W. Hall ct al, defendant allowed
until November Ii, 1900, to file objec-
tons.
Mary Lang VS.. State Bank of Indian
ola, defendant allowed to answer in
%stanter; plaintiff given 30 days to reply.
Mary f. Thompson VS.. Irvee S. Had
lee ct al, defendant allowed until No
vember Ii. 1900, to file objections.
James w. Hupp VS.. George S. Yarnal
ct al, defendant allowed until November
Ii, 1900, to file objections.
Winnie d. Stoddard VS.. James c..
Kane, settled and dismissed.
DIVORCES.
George Grimes VS.. Mary Grimes,
granted.
Martha A. Blair VS. John Blair, grant
ed with custody of children.
Margaret Heinlein VS.. John Heinlein.
settled and dismissed.
Sarah A. Vision VS.. Jacob Vision,
divorce with custody of children.
Jane M. Bower VS.. Henry Bower,
granted; G. B. & Q. ordered to pay $50
into the court within six days; allowed
$500 alimony and custody of child.
Thomas E. Scofield VS.. Alice M. SEQ
field, granted.
Amanda Liston VS.. Charles H. Liston.
granted: custody of children and ali
mony.
Mary B. Harden VS.. Burt G. Harden,
granted.
EQUITY CASES.
Loretta Groves ct al. VS.. Alfred S.
Ford, motion for new trial overruled.
William H.. Akin VS.. Henry Marshall
ct al, dismissed as to Henry and Maria
Marshall; due plaintiff from Charles H.
Oman ct ux., S792.47: due Bogart g.
Hayden, S135.35.
Arthur Walsh VS.. Squire Cox ct al.
due plaintiff, S937.55.
Shelley, Rogers & Co.. VS.. William F.
Everist ct al, plaintiff confesses motion
and is allowed to give security for costs,
and defendants allowed 80 DAYS there
after to plead.
Josephine Sutton VS.. Eva B. Goodner
ct al, plaintiff allowed 20 days in which
to file an amended answer: defendant
allowed 80 days thereafter to plead.
Henry A. Wyman VS.. Globe Invest
ment Co., defendant allowed 60 DAYS to
pay the plaintiff, otherwise the title is
quoted in plaintiff.
James E. Seeley VS.. Cynthia A. Har-
ney ct al, due plaintiff from Mary Duff
fey, S598.19.
Solomon Wells VS.. James A. Porter ct
al, defendant allowed 30 days to answer.
I. J. Cress VS.. William E. Marquis ct
al, due plaintiff from defendant, S275.-
%; from W. V. Marshall, S752.O9.
Kate W. Doty VS.. Peter McClain ct al,
due S106.34.
S. o. Simonds VS.. J. A. Boyd, demur-
Ter to petition overruIed.
STEELE Wedeles Co. VS.. David Diamond
ct al, demurrer to petition.
Nebraska Loan & Trust Co. VS.. Ster-
ling P. Hart ct al, due J. w. Hupp,
5000: due plaintiff from defendant and
wife, S2,S42.49.
Bank of Burchard VS.. Henry Green ct
al, demurrer to answer.
III. j. Gilliland VS.. James A. Porter ct
al, due plaintiff, 500. 90.
G. L. Vaughn VS.. Ellen LeHew ct al,
plaintiff allowed 30 days to reply.
Frank Halfrmon ct al. VS.. Howard NJ.
Gardner ct al, decree as prayed for.
Ella M. Little VS.. James E. Lawthers
ct al, decree for S396.59.
Charles F. Elliott VS.. Charles S..
White ct al, decree for S215.50.
Sarah J. Cooley VS.. Horace Bull ct al,
jury rendered verdict for plaintiff.
McCook Irrigation and Water Power
Co. VS.. Herman M. Meyer ct al, defend