Virginian-pilot. (Norfolk, Va.) 1898-1911, 1900-02-09

interstate commerce, and was, there
fore, beyond the mower Of the city. :
The Judgment of the Hastings Court
must be reversed. the verdict Of the
jury set aside and q new trial awarded
the plaintiff in error
SUMMARY.
A summary of the proceedings of the
court Is as follows:
Painter and als. vs.. ST. Clair and ais.
circuit Court Of Pulaski county. Re-
Versed. Judge james Keith, D.
Adkins Sc Co. VS.. city of Richmond.
Hastings Court of the city of Rich
mond. Reversed. Judge John w. RE
ly.
G. & Oh Railway Co. VS.. Jennings.
Circuit Court of Fluvanna county. AZ
flrmed. Judge r. II. Caldwell.
Duncan VS.. city of Lynchburg. Writ
OF error to Judgment of the Corpor-
alton Court of the city OF Lynchburg.
Affirmed. Judge A. Buchanan.
richmond Traction Co. vs. Murphy
Hastings Court of the city of Rich
mond. Amended and affirmed. Judge
George NJ. Harrison.
Galloway VS.. .Saunders. Circuit Court
of Franklin county. Appeal and super
sedas. No bond
Richmond Railway and Electric COM
pany VS.. Richmond city. Hastings
Court of the city of Richmond. Writ OF
error Bond $780,
White, trustee VS.. Johnson. Law and
Equity Court OF the city of Norfolk
Appeal awarded. Bond 5000.
Richmond city VS.. Epps. Hastings
Court Of the city of Richmond. Writ
of error and supersedeas. Bond $500.
Catherine Cash VS.. Humphreys, re-
ceiver, etc. Circuit Court of Bedford
county. Appeal. Bond, $3.50.
Lee, Taylor e Snead VS.. Willis. Cir
cult Court OF Franklin county. APP
peal. Bond, $3.50.
John Freeman VS.. Commonwealth.
Circuit Court of the city of Richmond.
Writ of error denied.
Lawrence VS.. Commonwealth. Coun-
ty Court of Nansemond county. Writ
of error refused.
Silverthorn Co. VS.. Williams Corpo-
ration Court Of Lynchburg. Writ of
error refused.
Lipscomb VS.. Coor's ex'or, &C. Cir
cult Court Of King William county. APP
peal refused.
Moore VS.. Pollock's ex'or. Circuit
Court OF Fauquier county. Writ of err
ror refused.
Toney VS.. Southern Railway Co. Cir
cult Court OF Danville Writ of error
refused.
Stuart's eS'or vs.. Peyton. Petition to
rehear. Petition refused.
Hirth VS.. Hirth. Argued by Hill Car
ter for plaintiff In error and Judge
Christian and r. B. Davis for defend
ant In error and submitted
Vashon's exors VS.. Yashon, &c. Sub
mitted.
Carpenter & Co. VS.. Virginia Caro-
lima Chemical Co. Argued by G. M.
Diliard and continued until tomorrow.
Smith & others VS.. Miller, trustee
ana Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. Of
New York vs.. Rutherford, Nos. 4S and
AZ on argument docket. are the next
cases to be called.
U. S. CIRCUIT COURT.
The United States Circuit Court of
Appeals was In session to-day. with
Judges Golf, Morris and Brawley on
the bench. The proceedings were MS
follows:
No. ss1. William B. strang, Jr.. ap-
pellant VS.. Richmond, Petersburg and
Carolina Railroad Company ct ais. an
pellees. appeal from the Circuit Court
ior the Eastern District Of Virginia, at
Kichmond; argued by d. Lawrence
Groner for appellant, and by w. r.
Mckenney for appellee. Pending the
90 e uiiie''' court ADJOURNED Until to-
morrow morning ut 10 o'clock.
NO. 346 Bradley Salt Company.
plaintiff In error, KS. Norfolk Import
Ing and Exporting Company, defendant
in error to Circuit Court for the East
ern district of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Will be the next case for argument
CHARTER RECORDED.
The charter of the Norfolk Ship.
building and Dry Dock Company was
recorded in the Office OF the Secretary
OF the Commonwealth this morning.
The incorporators are Messrs. ]. p.
andre Mottu. Henry Seymour, j. a. C.
Groner, r. *. Cralle and b. A. Co
ionna. The capital stock Is 10 be not
less than $4,000, nor more thar $780,
oOO WV