The sea coast echo. [volume] (Bay Saint Louis, Miss.) 1892-current, 1899-06-03
HANCOCK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT.
Proceedings of r1ay Term, 1869, Judge
Wood Presiding.

T c. Stewart vsL. 6 \. RR.
Co. trespaes. Ordered defend
ant have sixty days in which to
plead and cause continued.
Charles FARRELL Us n. 0 & \. (.
RR.. appeal. This cause having
been settled and costs paid by de-
fendant it is ordered that same be
dismissed.
G. ". Mitchell VS. \. 7. Clark,
appeal. Plaintiff by attorney ap-
plies for a continuance in this
cause and which is granted upon
condition that said plaintiff pay
the costs accrued at this term. 1t
Is considered hy the court that
this cause be continued and that
defendant have and recover of and
from said plaintiff the costs IN
csrred at this term to be taxed.
y. l.. Lee VS. n. @. & \. +. RR.,
appeal. Upon motion of plain
tiff this cause is dismissed at de-
fendant's 8 costs to, be taxed, etc.
The Vermont Chemical Mfg.
Go. VS. George II. Combel, appeal.
Henry Combel, garnishee. Upon
motion of garnlohee herein it IS
ordered by the court that this
cause be dismissed at plaintiff is
costs. and to be taxed for which
execution may arise.
Louis Dumini VS. John Rochon,
damages. Plaintiff herein having
wholly failed and neglected to
comply with the rule for security
for costs at the last term OF the
conr, in this cause. 1t Is there
fore ordered upon motion Of de
fcndaat.that said rule ne He"e alb
soIuje and cause di-mis~ei at the
cos.+ Of said plaintiff to De taxed
for which execution may arise.
c,tatevs Henry Johnson. Shoot
INC with intent. Upon good
cause sh0vn to the court H. is or
derea hat the sentence which was
suspended at last term be again
suspended until next teyn-of this
court.
State vs. Nelson Keller. Comes
the District Attorney anu also
comes the defendant who been
arraigned to the bill of Indictment
herein pleads guilty. 1t is con-
,idered by the court that said de-
fendant be released on his recOg-
nizance until the further order |
Of this court.
The State VS. Fannie Acker,
adultery and fornication. Con-
-inued by State
The State VS. D. j. Stewart, car
wing concealed weapon. C0ntin- |
ned by defendant.
The State vs. Henry Burge, C. c.
y. Jury find defendant guilty as
recommended to the
mercy Of the court. Remanded to
;he custody of the sheriff to await !
he further order of the court.
VIM. H. Matthews & Bro. vs.
Landrieu Bros, assumpsit. Con-
;idered by the court that the plain
5iff do have and recover from the /
defendants the sum Of $460.30 and !
,OstS.
H. I. Cottam & Co., Ltd, vs.
VI Sansovich, attachment. De-
'endant default in appearing con-
,idered by court that said attach
nent was rightfully sued out and
hat same be maintained,
H. T. Cottam & Co.. Ltd, vs.
VI. Sansovich, attachment. In de-
,ault of coming to answer to
summons, considered by the court |
hat said plaintiffs do have and
recover the sum of $4,000 and
appearing to the satisfaction of
he court that there has been
seized and there is now in posses
sion of the sheriff certain goods,
,aid goods aggregating to $4,000.
ordered said goods be sold by
sheriff.
Bertha NJ. O'ReillyvS Mary Ann
Tarand. Ejectment. Continued.
L. Spotorno ct al vs. Del |
ohlne Tancre, ejectment. Plain
Tiff granted to recover certain
lands.
Andrew J. Stewart ct al VS. Jos. |
4. Favre. Continued.
Martha jackson vs. Sarah Spiro;
eiectment. Continued.
The State VS. Freeman Royal,
shooting with intent. Continued.
State VS. Zeno Alsbrook, assault
and battery. Fined $1,000
The State VS. NJ. g. Brookman,
appeal. Cause dismissed, defen-
dant discharged without pay.
taxed with the prosecu-
tiop.
State VS. Edmund Lewis, Jr..
cutting with intent. Remanded
to custody of sheriff to await fur
Their action of court.
The State VS. Fred Davis, shoot
inc with intent. Filed and fur
ther proceedings cease.
State VS. Asa FARRELL, exhibiting
deadly weapon. Defendant dis
charged. Not guilty.
Warren W. Jordan vs. John w.
Stewart Plaintiff dead. Court
ordered case to be continued when
representation of deceased be.
known.
Aycock, Rice & Co. vs. v; D.
Sylvester, trespass on case. Plain
tiffs admitted to recover from de-
defendant s41S.02 and costs.
Virgie Cleveland VS. the city OF
Bav St. Louis, damages. The mo-
tion of defendant herein to re-
ouire the plaintiff to give security
for costs is by the court sustained
and so days allowed said plaintiff
a. r;x-a said cpcuritV.