Little Falls weekly transcript. (Little Falls, Morrison Co., Minn.) 1894-19??, 1899-09-22

e
bottle. ~ ~ i }..5 -, ii s.1s$s .,s 81
The pa.J.H. MCLEAN MEDICINE co. q
,.r.'{ IT. LOUIS. NO. !, + b ,ss s.s# Sss
For sale by = = s$sy }r- Z 2 n ID
:. ..s l.. D.BroW'1nI.l,
case was first tried ut the March
term and resulted in a verdict Of $500
for the plaintiff. - .ssg. S$ 81
| Case No. p, which was to have
followed the Smart case, was cons
tinued over the term, This, is q
similar action brought by William
j. Parker to recover damages for
injuries received while working ID
the Pine Tree saw mill. Owing tO
the similarity of the two cases the
court thought it would not be adj
visable to try the case this term, al
all the jurors not sitting on the
Smart trial were listeners to the
evidence In the case, and. their judgs
ment In the other, case might be
affected to some extent thereby. The
case was therefore continued.
r After disposing Of this case No. II
was called. This was an action
brought by. Donat' Trettel against
James Hamlin to recouer an amO cunt
claimed to be due said plaintiff as
commission for selling land for de-
fendant A, p. Blanchard was at
torney for the plaintiff and Hon. IN;
Richardson for the defendant. The
case was given to the jury at noon
Wednesday,. f.5sS 1890
OF the other cases on. the calender
No. l, Brooks eco. VS.. E. Z. @SiebeTf;
No. 2, C. +. Beale & Co.. W. Idttae
Falls Improvement Il CO;
William Peaver vs.. James RAMSEY
and Gillian Ramsey: No. 4, Curtis Il
Lawrence VS.. s. Dover; No. 5, Moses
LAfond VS.. & Northern Pacific Rail
way g Company; No. 6, Sophie
Tramal vs.. oseyh Nowotny; No. 81
John Anderson vs. Geo. Anderson;
No. 16, Geo. Foldinski VS.. Thos,
Perowitz; No. "a, John Sitzmans VS..
JOS. Meyerhofer; Mo. ~. First Natl.
Bank vs. Andrew Lasetzki; and No.
Al, Henry Schiff vs.. NJ. Zerwas, have,
been continued. a
Cases No. 8, John Kerich and Geo.
F. Moeglein vs., Julius Newman; No.
Is, Robert d. Russell as Receiver Of
the Security Savings and Loan as
ISOLATION VS.. Alexander Rowe, and
No. 26; Mary r. Butler VS.. Joseph
Belleieille, Amelie Bellefeille and J.
Mecusker, have been settled and dis.
missed. ',.--'~ = :. T. i
All but one OF the criminal cases
that were up for trial at this term OF
court have been continued until the
March term. The one which has not
been continued ia the case of the
state against Math Krause, charged
with an assault with a dangerous
weapon. This will in all probability
be continued also. Wednesday after
noon Sam Day, Will Smith and John
Dix, charged with cutting timber.
and Martin Fleishacker,ss charged
with assault with a dangerous
weapon, were brought into court to-
plead to the charges against them:
The court had previously appointed
Attorney E. s. Smith to defend them.
All entered a plea OF not guilty, and
their cases were continued, each Civ
ing bail for his appearance at the
March term OF court. 81. Il
In the civil calendar rapid progress
is being made, about five cases hav-
ing been disposed OF during Wednes-
day and today. ii T. >5#1:.}&H5> Il
The jury in the case OF Donat
Trettel vs.. James Hamilton, after
being out several hours, returned a
verdict Wednesday, afternoon inI
favor Of the defendant. This. action
was brought to recover $72, claimed |
to be due as commission for selling
land by the plaintiff for the defend
ant. 1t is understood thatthe plain
tiff will move for a new trial on the
ground that certain witnesses whose
evidence was material to the plain
lifts case were not present to testify,
Notwithstanding chat they bad been
duly subpoenaed. s5s. ~
Case No. 80, Joseph Bellefeuille and
Emilinas Bellefeuille vs.. /. e. Staples
was the next case tried. tt was an
action brought toscancel a Judgment
for 1886 secured by Mr.. Staples against
the plaintiffs. The jury returned a
verdict for the plaintiffs, III
IN case, No. AZ a verdict was also
reached. ! This Is an action brought
by hejplaintiff Frederick EverdingI
49, u e