Burlington weekly free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1866-1928, 1899-11-30

cClur upon leaving.
The chancellor ordered temporary in
functions placed upon tho group of drug
core and motel cases agued together at
tine former hearing. They We're the fol-
lowing with the addition of some few
cases added to the classes at the hoaCng
Tuesday afternoon:
State VI. f. l.. Taft
State VS. f. j. Bcaupre.
state ". j. q. BcllroSc.
state W. George \. ChurcnDI.
state vs.. p. H. Collins.
state vs.. Willis Atherton.
State vs. Trofiie nuhar"l
state vs.. Eugene Gcsselin.
state vs.. a. T.. Gossciin.
state vs.. w. p. Hall.
State vs.. George LoVcland.
state ". y. II. McCuen.
State ". T.. II. Parker.
State ". Mary +. Powers.
State ". f.. Il. Stcarns.
State ". w. II. Xottman
State ". ". j. Henderson.
state ~. w b. Craven.
State ~. j. T.. Naylou.
state ". J. q. Bacon.
State W. Michael Mclaughlin.
State ". Charles Muir of this cry.
state ". William Folsom of Jericho.
State vs.. e. \, Fuller and SjG,e ". *. $.
Delormc of Huntington.
state " Xcph NapSood Of EsscY.
State W. Michael Dorm of Richmond.
State W.. Julius CrCto Of Essex.
state vs.. +. T.. Ailard cf Wro1aki.
State ". e. y. Frost of Milton.
In making the ordor fer temporary in
functions in these cases Chancellor ROW
ell said i'm ua.t:
As to thn.., eases submitted last week,
thfnl; thor. were nineteen, they were
submitted on a statement of facts. The
facts arr that the special stamp tax was
paid. that the persons named were and
are doing business as indicated; and that
Inc attendants are druggists OF hotel
lteone..s So far as the testimony of last
term qoes there can be no doub. as
Ia tho right to show the pavment Of the
revenue tax The statute provides that
the nav,nnnt of this tax shall be prima
racie cvide,,ce Of hcing n common seller
ard maintaining a nuisance | shall treat
ttts etnt,,ta ns consiitutior,al Now it is
claimed that no TEMPORARY Injunction can
he Granted unless the nuisance is actually
,,oI.,tai,,od M the limo of tho proceedings
rrLnro Tho evi1nnca or the licersc only
elbows that where the. tax was paid the
,l',rr was , n,,isa, &C. II is necessary to
drd mic TO py,ant - tomnoratv iriunctlon?
,,,t ,,,,,,., tbnr r.Corrnd 10 thn different
statut.s rri,tino f. nuisance II is said
~, ,ti,,,,1 th,t If tho rronertv owners
DO NO., T., N,,. ,,,,i..,cc ie bsire kent they
81 o,,Id NOT bc beId liable man may bc
~. rr,ipc on a l,v.frl business one Of his
oI.'rt., sclIs Iouor in a Garner and the
-. i,n,.s &c mi. Thc, inc uro-
,i,, fe,.. tLis T., no done If we rat,r.
T. ~ stat,,t.s of 1Son if vould seem that
T., or,o,. 20 ,rr,.nt n tcr,rorarv Injunction
~ tI,o ,,njsanc5 mist oxisi and thai is so
' WY ~ -; r,,,i;,iod h,. tLn lac nr 1S,>
,I,,,'. ,l',.io,, 1ria,.s os ia whether ;hcro
',u ,.iIor,oo 80 shor, thot Tho nu,sances
- a' ga ,I,t.'o mesa orocn,.6inps were in
,,,,,,sa A. rot o,s,oe ,b',t - license is
Si i5 ~, az ~ ti,,,o Of II. issu,
~ NV 'S f,. ,.,a, md a,ar1, dav a
~ y t'HIn ~ 'Vi " i,,.;,,, H. ,orr3 II
mas ho,Ua nc irtont 70 40 husiness,
- ~ "a a. o, "a mo Iost d.,v If its
~ i,e - as 49, ~ r.s, yo, mist dis
49, nv a. 80 ~. ''ti.,,aI .nd ,thrr mis-
Iii'9 "i''i o't ~, - i'it 10, ,,. o,,errovv
al'cTs' III las - n''u .'', ,hn,e tu.i,o
Vi IAN" 80 ,, si, sn,oLastack