Santa Fe new Mexican. [volume] (Santa Fe, N.M.) 1898-1951, 1899-09-13
THE COURT is BUSY
There Are 280 Gases on the Civil
Docket and % on the
Criminal.
ALL CASES CALLED ONCE
The Civil Docket Will Be Gone Over Again
As Many Of the Attorneys Were
Not Ready With Their
Gases.

Ct VI ~
printed. Quite a number of these were
disposed of to-day. Many were dis
missed, and in a few the court handed
down decisions. The civil docket will be
gone over again, as many of the attor-
neys We're not prepared with their
cases yesterday. The cases set for trial
are comparatively few. A number have
been dragging along for years, through
no fault Of the court, but owing to de-
lays by parties to the suits or their at
torneys.
In the territorial court the reading Of
the civil docket was finished to-day. In
the remaining cases entries were made
as follows: ~
William G. Friday VS.. Ernestine Zins-
ser, administrative; continued.
Julian A. Martinez ct al. VS.. Rio Hon
do Gold Placer Mining Company; jury
waived, trial by court, Judgment for
plaintiff for / cent and costs.
In the matter of the application of the
City of Santa Fe to condemn certain
lands; settled and discontinued at city's
costs.
Abraham Staab VS.. Frank c. Deutsch-
err; continued.
John s. Cain vs.. Neill B. Field; set for
September 81.
Maria Fernando Martinez VS.. James
Lucas; continued.
First National Bank Of Santa Fee VS..
E. B. Ames ct al; continued.
In the matter of the application of the
City of Santa Fe; set for September 20.
Browne, Manzanares & Co. VS.. Hiram
Hines ct al; continued because no serv-
ice.
H. B. Cartwright VS.. Louise M. Wynn
koop ct al; continued.
Newton s.. Finney VS.. New Mexico
Mining Company; settled and dis
missed.
Territory VS.. William Game ct al;
judgment nil dicit for plaintiff.
Territory of New Mexico VS.. Juan B.
Martinez; continued.
William H. Weed VS.. Santa Fe Cop
per Company; continued.
Mariana F. Sena VS.. J. P. McNulty;
set for trial September rs.
Abraham Staab VS.. Francisco Chaves
y Montoya; continued.
Abraham Staab VS.. David Martinez,
Jr.; set for trial September %.
A. F. L~audenslager vs.. D. l.. Miller;
dismissed at plaintiff costs.
Tro,ooJo O. ~ xa n Wy 1o~or
der; dismissed for want of prosecution
and at plaintiffs costs.
N. B. Laughlin VS.. H. S. Church; con
tinued.
s. H. Elkins VS.. D. T. Taylor; stricken
off the docket.
Earnest A. Mecke VS.. George B.
Knight; set for trial September %.
Petro Delgado vs.. A. p. Coape; set for
trial Saturday, September %.
Jose Quintana VS.. E. H. Bergman;
set for trial September 25.
8. H. Elkins, receiver, VS.. Rignaldo
Sanchez; dismissed at plaintiffs costs.
Solomon Luna VS.. Cerrillos Coal Rail-
road Company; set for September %.
Thomas B. Catron VS.. H. H. Carpen-
ter; set for September %.
Ida Cochran VS.. John w. Cooper; set
for September %.
First National Bank of Santa Fe VS..
Edward F. Hobart; dismissed.
S. s. Beatty VS.. w. ]. Slaughter; set
for September 20.
s. s. Beatty vs.. M. J. Maggie; set for
September %.
Seligman Bros. VS.. William E. Martin
ct AL; judgment for plaintiff for $40 and
costs.
Pablo Arandra ct al. VS.. the Argo
Mining Company; set for September Is.
Silas w. Smith VS.. James M. Allen ct
al; dismissed at plaintiffs costs.
Josefa Ortiz de David vs.. Antonio J.
Ortiz; September 81.
Leo Herself VS.. o. Marsh; Judgment
for plaintiff for $S4 and costs.
Paul Wunschmann VS.. Charles Has
pelmath; set for September q.
Jake Gold VS.. Julian Padilla; set for
September %.
H. L. Ortiz VS.. John Block; abated.
Adam Laudenslager vs.. John Block;
abated.
H. L. Ortiz VS.. Virginia G. de Macs
tas; set for September 26.
A. M. Bergere vs.. Saturnino Lueras;
set for September %.
David M. White VS.. Walter B. Duffy;
dismissed.
w. G. Ritch vs.. Joe Wolf and Anton
Fink; set for September %.
Cerrillos Supply Company VS.. s. L.
North and ]. B. McAfee; referred to
Colonel G. W. Knaebel, referee.
Thomas B. Catron VS.. the New Mexi-
co Mining Company; set for September
%.
Abraham Staab VS.. ]. H. Blain; set
for September 20.
(Isador Ferran vs.. Eugenio iYrissarri
ct al; Judgment for plaintiff for want
of answer.
Jose M. C. Chavez ct al. vs. Eugenio
Yrissarri ct al; judgment for plaintiff.
Board of Home Missions va. City Of
Santa Fe; dismissed.
City of Santa Fe va. Luciano Campag- |
noli; set for September 80.
L