The Stark County Democrat. [volume] (Canton, Ohio) 1833-1912, 1899-10-24
WEEKLY BULLETIN.
Complete Record of the Business Done
i'm Common Pleas Court
Last Week.

A complete record of the business
transacted in the Stark county court of
Z mmon pleas for last week will be
found below:
ROOM NO. JUDGE T. T. MCCARTHY.
Monday, Oct. 16.-Houvig VS. Navarro
Glass Marble and Speciality company ct
al. Celestia Lilly made defendant with
leave to file answer instanter.
Dime Savings Bank Co. VS. Renner ct
al. Simon Hartzell made party with
leave to file cross-petition instanter.
Meyers trus. VS. Phillips ct al. Trial
to court. Verdict for plaintiff.
Owens VS. McCue. Leave to answer by
October 2Sth, 1899.
McCue VS. Owens. Leave extended to
both parties for one week from October
| 16, 1899.
Kaufman, admr., VS. Northern Cen
trail Life Insurance Co. Leave to file
second amended answer and cross petit
ton instanter.
| Buttermore VS. Heppert ct al. Judge
ment on default for $146.02.
Duebel VS. Gelwick. Leave to answer
by October 30, 1899.
Herring VS. Powers ct al. Dismissed by
plaintiff and at his costs.
Wise, trus., etc., VS. Spiro ct al. Dis
missed at costs of defendant Spiro.
Holloway Paving Brick Co.'s receiver
VS. Spiro. Dismissed at costs of defend
ant Spiro.
Lynch VS. st. Clair. Trial to court.
Decree.
Duffy's assignee VS. City of Alliance.
Motion to petition sustained; plaintiff
has leave to amend petition by interim
leation.
Rose VS. Burckle. Motion left off mo-
ton docket.
City Of Massillon VS. Crawford ct al
Demurrer to answer oyerruled, plaintiff
lexcepts and has leave to file reply by
lOctober 2S, 1899.
Girard VS. Murphy. Demurrer to petit
ion sustained, leave to amend petition
by interlineation.
Oyster VS. Oyster ct al. Motion for al
imony pendente lite sustained; alimony
allowed plaintiff in the sum of SIS.
Barlet VS. Barlet ct al. Motion sus-
tanned; leave to file answer to cross-pe.
ltition of Annie S. Monnett.
Ohio VS. Vaughn ct al. Defendant with.
drew his former plea of not guilty anG
pleads guilty and is sentenced to the
Ohio Reformatory.
Tuesday, Oct. T.-Goheen Mfg. Co. v.
, Penna Co. ct al. Settled.
; Culbertson VS. City of Massillon ct al
Leave to reply instanter.
Dannemiller & Sons VS. Miller ct al
Trial to court; judgment for $315.27.
Meyer VS. Miller ct al. Trial to court
Judgment for plaintiff for $62.07.
Wingerter VS. Griffith. Leave to an
swer by Nov. 1st, 1899.
Schlafiey VS. Wampler ct al. Settled
Lehman VS. Cross. Demurrer overrul
ed; defendant excepts.
Bushman's exrx. VS. Pointiuss admrs
Motion to petition overruled; defendan
excepts and has leave to plead on or be
fore October 20, 1899.
Wednesday, October 1S.-Melhuish vi
Melhuish's assignee. Trial to court; de
cree for PLAINTIFF defendant gives motto,
of appeal; bond fixed at 5000.
Wolf VS. Holl ct al. Trial to court
petition dismissed at cost of plaintiff
Aromand VS. Aromand. Trial to court
divorce granted.
Liable VS. Schario ct al. Demurrer t,
supplemental answer overruled ant
plaintiff not desiring to further plead
: trial to court; judgment for defendant
Snyder VS. Snyder. Trial to court; di
vorce granted.
Diebold VS. Mcneil ct al Motion t,
J strike out sustained; plaintiff except
and leave to file amended petition b.
, November 4, 1899.
Diebold VS. Nc Neil ct al. Motor
verruled; defendant excepts.
Tuesday, Oct. 19-Martin VS. Hartranft
, Dismissed without prejudice at costs O
lplaintiff.
Friday, Oct. 20.-Bartlet VS. Bartlett e
, al. Leave to reply by October q, 1899.