The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1899-09-13
HAYES STILL TEST|FY|NG
The DESCENDANTS Expert on the
Stand All Day Yesterday.
HE ISN'T THROUGH YET
He Confirms in Detail the General State
ments He Made in His Evidence
Monday--Takes the Vein Out
side the Hanging Wall.

Yesterday was another important day
in the Pennsylvania mining case, in
which the defendants part of the evil
dence is now being put in, Lee Hayes,
the first expert witness for the defend
ant, was on the stand most of the day,
and will continue his evidence this
morning.
The evidence of the witness yesterday
confirmed in detail the general state
ments in his evidence the previous day.
Also yesterday he took the vein, which
the plaintiffs witnesses said showed
the hanging wall at the apex, outside
of the hanging wall.
Upon the resumption of the case at
10 o'clock the witness for the defense,
Carl Davis, resumed the stand.
Mr.. Davis testified that over one
half of the workings shown upon the
defendants general map were drawn
from his survey notes. As to the rest
of the workings, as represented upon
the map, he knew nothing, and he could
not verify the map as to them.
AS to a north stope on the 450 level,
the witness said that he did not survey
the locality of it and did not furnish
the notes for the part of the map show
ing it.
you did not give anybody any notes
for that, did you?" asked Mr. Corbett,
who was cross-eXamining the wit
ness.
mo. sir: I do not recognize it as my
work" answered Mr.. Davis.
A plat map used in this cross-exami-
( nation was put in evidence by Mr.. Cor
bett.
The redirect examination of Mr.. Da-
Wis was then taken up by Mr.. Seal
lon.
rs there anything on the general
map representing a stope or anything
above the sill floors of the levels?"
asked Mr.. Scallon.
mo; l can't say there is, unless it is
a raise. The horizontal projections of
raises are shown. if the raises have in
elinations,' said the witness.
In the recross-eXamination of the wit
ness he said that he meant that he had
not surveyed the sill floors of the Slopes
referred to.
A. X. Abbott said that he was a civil
4 and mining engineer and had been an
employee of the Boston & Montana COM
pany since 1896. He testified that he
surveyed the workings of the Pennsyl-
vania and Mountain View mines and
that he believed the surveys are cor
rect. The witness said that he did not
do the plating.
In his eross-examination by J. w.
Cotter of counsel for the plaintiff, he
said that he had not connected the
workings of the Pennsylvania and
tfRarus by surveys of both, but that the
relative workings were connected by
means of coordinate survey points on
the Rarus mine furnished him by Mr..
Batterman. He started his survey from
an established survey station on the
surface, and the general map was con-
structed from his survey and the sur
yeys of others.
In his recross-eXaminat ton he said
that he had assumed the correctness of
Mr. Battermans notes in making his
computations. He proved them correct
by his surveys afterwards.
q Mr.. Hollingshed. another surveyor
was the next witness. He testified that
he made the surveys of the levels and
workings shown at the extreme eastern
end of the general map.
The counsel for the plaintiff had no
questions to ask this witness.
Mr.. Davis again took the stand and
testified to a survey, connected with the
Lloyd shaft, which he made. He said
this survey was connected with the
same system of coordinate points used
by Surveyor Abbott.
The plaintiff had no questions tc
ask.
Daniel Robertson was the next wit
ness who came. He testified that he
made the general map and most of the
other from notes furnished him, and
that the maps were correct.
In his cross examination by Mr.. Cor
5 bett, the witness said that he did not
know anything about the correctness
of the representations of geological con-
ditions on the maps. He made the
marks representing the geological for
nations under instructions.
In his recross- examination he said