The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1899-03-13
LEGAL NOTICES.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING
County, state Of washiugton-sA- 3. ker-
~ Plaintiff. vs.. Seattle Cedar Lumber
Company Defendant. No 2..0s4 Notice
OF fling al petition. and OF preliminary
order thereon. and 81 time and place
fixed by said order for hearing thereof,
for order directing defendants receiver
10 sell all ts remaining assets. etc.
Notice is hereby given hey the UNDER
signed 10 r. l. Curtis, the receiver IN the
ahove-entltltd cause NJ the property OF the
Seattle Cedar Lumber Company. ths de-
PENDANT in said cauSe. and TO Jacob fufth,
the receiver of the late firm az Nosher Il
Mcdonald heretofore appointed az such
BY the abose~laned superior court OF
King county washington, and TO al the
creditors Of said defendant Seattle Cedar
Lumber Company whose claims have been
proved and allowed under said receiver
ship la said csase. and to all other parties
or persons interested in the affairs Of SAID
defendant that the undersigned. tie Union
National Rank II Troy New York, and
the state Savings Bank Of Detroit. Michf-
gan creditors Of SAID defendant, have This
day flied in the office Of the clerk of the
al named @s3syf, tn the aEsyse-ersttsed
CAUSE. their petition therein. addressed To
said court and 70 the Hon. Nm. Hickman
Moore one 81 TIE Judges thereof. 10 ana
by which pefitan they have prEyef said
court and sakf Judge thereof. among other
things THAI an ersssr rTaY be made BY szti
court fixsng ise time and rlaee Tor she
hearing NJ s<aisx petition and directing that
faoiiee thereof. requiring all parties inter-
1sted 81 the Affairs Of said defendant 10
show cause as Hasd time and pace why
the sale therein pra y.1 for xassul3 not he
ordered sy said court and made ~ its sasd
receiver ;Esrasa b given IL ~atd receiver
therein 70 all creditors 8f slsd defendant
whose claims a4asa1 sad defendant have
b,s7s proved anS allowed under said re-
rss.pwrSnlp ard 70 ssss larc FIRM Of A.~s~r
A. Mcdonald. 81 Seattle. Washington, or
sts receiver appointed s1ch hr said
court as EEufasaxa ny publishing. mailing
IA ~
rarssxEfsnarF order pseessFttse. and tnas
sspaa tiss hearing ~ sste petition. IN pssr-
sssAuea Of such preliminary order. AND ca
due proof ssf t8s GIVING SE Aesstcs - there
in prescribed an sTtIeF Ray ise made nv
sad court directing kne receiver ri the
.srukasrtE IT said Defendant IL said cause
20 sell all The slssa - q SAL astss'tAitt m
SAID ree&fT#Fa hsFsss ssr ataf@r his control,
~ every Kind sad n@sWr~ at YsEtsisc aan-
saAn 90 the hig$sass Bidder. tn ssss-h rAn-
REF aTs as such tsEEEss AZ sac court may
81 saeA order gTssaT3S@. ard that asscb
sale FusY - trade Accordingly. ard that
en- ssstS s3sN4s * ttsasz a3s Report thereof
suea Ssse ard sal gassCy; nay - 3a.y
confirmed ~ an ss9ieY 81 sad eoaaFt and
ffsss taeressnaGr sfsssr further appropriate
orders 81 tha crzssf TIE ffs~-sssrl< ssf ssser
SAFE ssAY frs1 be zBssBz@& rs So 4 rer&ss.r
10 Inc TATaaeoe sHs5 ItssssAExe az ali To-
ssefyssawsesA incurred by sad receiver SD
hs. tsESgiec= s4~gr - szgfsse and sss1 otherwise
psiG and te sAs 9ssns@nE u Szl proper *
p9Dses ~ s@s@ rsc@s*Ax%fgp. 4aG tfss Te-
nsSsss5%~ fSeFHsag Hs4S 20 Fa@arf& aSefsfnsfs-
sa 50 81 S2@ geassst@Is 81 saa& 3tss #se 1T
wHess- claims aszaNs 8sa9 proved ard ar
ss~~ss n ssa&4 e@sSs@ aforesaid. ard gssAS
sea.9 petitioners EGag ks@@e @saf5 other 20
saTtMer order oF 19Ass. oF fSyth, - tna
Dgesss5@es. as - TIE eSzrt SHAT SEEN pg0s-
er tsAs aEzss fhe ABErx If sat& fssts-
tsen preliminary gssssrz sAsrrep ssas Sa.s
sz@y s~sea aEsSy made % sxS1 s0asg sod sss-
ssEs5 ~ reesszsi - s@@a 9asEse sn2ofsg essssx
tls3nys estsrsag sazt s.sa pettsasn s.e beard
uU<sa st# snsefss fsv snsss eaaTt IL ire courts
Fposgs ~ sfse ssy1ssy department. thars@E d:
tAe Cassrt sssssEse 10 Ssss C5*S " Seattle
HGnE 9psAazT ~ @SsssSfsss 3s~faT4 Hen
"a N. f4tasEzau AseTe. he 5s3x< II Tire
s@s1y< fEssassgg fs1 @ss4 sssgraFss wsnt ans
p 10 ssEaesg s231 Fsy@a asss&Sg sFsAar %
SATURDAY. Maf~a u. ls*s. ss the c4eu.ax