The sun., 1899-12-16


atthls point was credit to nobody who tool
II offer this paper in evidence" said Mr
WeSsksi ,lor the purpose OF questioning the
but. your Honor" Interrupted Mr.. Osborne
AZ this po,nt "; Weess,s voice. which y
for Ia manifest unlairness 10 statements he
made In presence OF the Jury" a,
Osborne and that gentleman saw 1t. aud realiz
ing that, temporarily at least he was beaten.he
sali: In regard to ,his particular nappsr.
hut want 20 call the Courts attention to Mr..
WsSskss represen,atfon sent in".n, ..1, ~ w.. go.
reprimand the d strict Attorney Tor his m an
ner and his speeches. which aie certainly Inn
BE fair. Mr.. Weeks. be fair. be iairi" shouted
~ object ip these remark. % Q, the Ri.,re: A. A..
sSST!!esy." Ss!!Hy. said Mr. Weeks and ask that they
Tho excitement was growing worry tense.
Ds to se Rae %seSs ao Sad
,ona!y HSteprssen,ed The character ra, % Of The ths
tSe tSeI play when VIII Mr, Weeks thundersd. Have we
NO rgh,s here that the District Attorney Is
over the desS and directed Mr Osborne m o"s 10 st
down, but Mr., Osborne didn't sit down, and
he made anoiher speech for the benefit Of the
Jury. Mr., Weeks AL the time asserting. We
sns Isat OF ri
reprlmnnd him and prevent him from continue
ally interfering these addresses prejHdicial TO
ns AIKEN al our Sen ne record that his
TIE Recorder Wa a.. it,l. red n the face and p,
Don take word that is being said"
sssst to Hoso sor, n,pSSssaE the
call your Honor's attention to the decision OF
the y Court RI, 81 Appesis; .,u. s,,,.un,
said the Reeorder. leaning oyer hts desk M again.
% ana H r%s az to aH sV. the m
precision that this writing was signature
waacn waw ANYBODY can ns see e. that !, s not" -, MI.
Mr.. Weeks. this time. with en- phssis out Of the
more. or. less excited. except .stenoerapher
Beard. who. on the or,ier Of the Recorder. was
r Snss UoEsa wS s
AZ the two LAWYERS.
S;5S., yGST Honor lone sssss ssss f. Sst tho Dis
Put your question. Mr.. Weeks" said the Re-
clraer. and don I lescend 10 such trvalitics.",
our de on 20 of our clients rights as triviality"
on the record"
RECORDERS TEMPER RurFLrD.
Recorder Coz was evidently very angry. al
though he tried TO suppress his feelings. Mr.
Osborne was still on his feet shouting and the
y,
YOU do not continue your crosse xamlnation OF
this witness Will discharge him" m.
again oblee, to your honors romarks and
Mr. Weeks. "and demand that they ne placed
upon the record. and In this connection l de-
your Honors attention to tho decls lsion OF the
Court Of Appeals in the cnse OF Bolen against
You are wasting your time. Mr.. Weeks"
declared the Recorder,
N ha n N
The Recorder leaned over the desk anI de-
Jared again. You are wasting your time. Mr.
I'VE again object to your Honor's remarks
md demand tina, that ee placed upon the
Five times lid IN. Recorier repeat the de-
iaratiqn You are wasting your time" and iiye
nd the remarks Of the District Attorney tend.
ng to influence the Jury against his client be
None OF the remarks did get on the record. |
or Stenographer Beard obeyed the Recor lers |
asa Gs1e'Gn sna Kesos1 3 s seDs R. a0y S u
he examination was resumed. Mr. %esEs
4 nd the Recorder admitted them. as well as the |
ne purporting TO be the s!Rnsture Of ]. Morton |
samed the making Of r. remarks MAJ % for the % ears i Of
~ elnry. This time he made them directly to |
neh way that the lu;y could not help but !
ear. M Weeks appealed TO him II do not |
INK tndt you Gu influence TINS Jury said he, !
but you know, ~ r Osborne. that what you are |
ding is nanirst improper" I
Alter the two pap RS ha been admitted In !
" idence. Mr.. Week. asked Mr., Kinsley II he .
I'd made any exam inatlon OF the papers that /
I'd forced on him the conclusion that the two ,
ere 10 the same handwriting.
These were h. two papers." said Mr. Kins-
W that told you yesterday did not have
: ifllclent writing on them 10 enable me 70
run any opinion. ard ! put them aside aud
ln9t exam ne them at all"
Nil you lay whetner or not you asked for +
n - Ytf I'M alf taR k.Na
! ,sse TWO tspersf' asked Mr Weeks. dt - '"a' oh
II did ask lor more OF the writing said Mr..
Y. Did you ever get any more7 A. did not.
How many times did you ask2 A. Two or
.; Aud no more was ever submitted TO you.
q nd SO lar as You can RENE ber In all OF your
lSestigation you meyer ran across further
ingle word Cornish" aud thr, other contained
aid that he had never tiled to iientiy The
Ir.tlng with T. at Of any other writing suU-
,hiue1 ,n TO MN, bqt he rememnered distinctly
40 . samn,eN. he had not rece we'd them lie
~ not snow who haa wr ttrn the Two sam
no nam. ~ Mr.oi riggs" and he reu.i.5
nat he uai. an that he had examined u good
deal OF the hanswr.tlns OF Mr. riggs. /
wEEEs PRESSES KISsLEY.
Then OF the writing sui mited to you on !
: he iirat 81 Inst Jhnunry," .ad Mr.. Weeks. tie p
ng To any one whs thNi IL the defendant whose
ilac" OF pusnoas Was IN he stmp.s, and oil the
I've sample all Io.d submitted these two you
nd not even examiner"
Mr. hIrSley replied that that was true He
Sont on 10 state IN rpDiy to farther uu-stionI
mat he Ind In his pos .essiOn the address ON
he poison package IIom Dec. 10 Dee T. .nd
That In Ih- nIeantim. he received many other
specimens Of htudwritng ron the polIcs
'onie oi winch w"r'' n evidence" One that be
Was the lrtIcr oi resignation
written ly Nol u"uN 10 John ID AIsus secre-
aiy oi the RnirkcrDOcker Ath etc Club
Mr.. WcrNr took new iRck here. Mr. KInslsy
lah iestie I over and over aghin that Ar lnil-
ire to Connect c"rtnin letters N the hAndwtit-
nR OF MolinruN was one Of the rharactrri,tcs
Lat mad" him believe that Mo ineux wrote
he Barnet and tOrnt-h letters, aud the ap-
rhTtnce al he same hrra = In the address on
~ ro,s0n racNage was on OF he character.
stI"s that mnda HIM to iIyr that Ao!ineuk
yro tina, address He had LAID great stress
NJ thir chhIH"t"r stc, On Jan Air kinslry
Shh Interviewed ~ a reporter 81 the Journal
M ~ that In ervi"w. which WAS printed on
IN =, VI, klnaI"y was quoted Us saying that
ha brenks lrtwcen III" letters IN tho nd
Tres. on the 20 son package were n pnrt
y the s"hem" nl the writer to discuies
he handy ritlng, nn ! not scharac'eristico o. the
writer Mr., Weeks rad u copy oi this inter-
1aw. M. kiusey hai forgot on ali about IT,
pIar'hty. Mr Weeks hcgan by askinV
shcther MI Kin: ev had not given an inter.
,t"w IN journal r"portpr ON Jan. Z, and Mr.
hinsey SAID that b" had; he wouldn't be sure