The morning news. [volume] (Savannah, Ga.) 1887-1900, 1899-01-10
JUDGE sPEER ASSIGNS CASES.
Opening Day Proceedings of the
United states Court.


United states Court.
The United States Court convened yes
terday morning The docket was called,
and Judge speer assigned number of
cases and set down others to be called to-
day for assignment for trial at future
date. This morning the judge win deliver
the charge to the grand jury, which viii
have a number Of cases presented for its
consideration.
The cases to be called to-day for as
sienment are as follows:
Joseph F. Williams vs.. Southern Rail-
way Company, Garrard, Medrim New
man for plaintiff; Goodyear & Kay for de-
PENDANT
Julia Bernheimer VS.. d. s. Sinclair Les
ter & Ravenel and w. L. Gignilliat for
plaintiff: Charlton, MackaI & Anderson
for defendant.
Emma f. Strain VS.. Mutual Insurance
Company of New York, Erwin, duBignon
& Chisholm for plaintiff; Mordecai &
Gadsden for defendant
Martin Karchner VS.. Southern Railway
Company, Brantley & Bennett, Garrard,
MelOrlfn q newman iot ptdlhtilS ooON-
year & Kay for defendant
Mary d. Ianier VS. Alison & Britton,
Lanier & Anderson for plaintiff; Garrard
& Meldrim for defendant.
Thomas Watson VS.. Donovan & Per-
kins, Garrard & Meldrim for plaintiff;
Denmark & Adams for defendant.
Intervention of Weed West. Harden e
McIAws, Lawton & Cunningham for de-
PENDANT; West, Harden & McLaws for in
terveners.
United States VS.. steamer Chattahoo-
chez L. S. attorney for libelant; Lawton
& Cunningham for respondent.
United States vs.. steamer Dauntless, U.
s. attorney for Hbeilant; Charlton, Mac
kali & Anderson, j. r. Hartridge for re-
spondent.
w. F.. Wilson VS.. steamer Ripon City,
Garrard Meidrim & Newman for libeilant;
Charlton, Mackall & Anderson for respon-
dent.
Darien and Sapelo Towboat Company VS..
brigantine ATLANTA, Charlton, Mackan e.
Anderson for libellant; no respondent
u. A. Wen ct al. VS.. Steininger Mercan-
tile Company, bankruptcy
Pollock & Bernheimer, ct al vs. Stein
niger Mercantile Company, bankruptcy
Gases We're assigned for trial as follows:
Wednesday, Jan 11-Anniston National
| Bank vs.. Cuyler and Woodburn Railroad
| Company; Intervention of Charles d. Bald
! win ct al, trustees, Barrow & Osborne for
| plaintiffs; Intervention of Whitfield Clark
Barrow & Osborne for intervenors; Peale,
| Peacock & Kerr VS.. James NJ Dixon
hearing on demurrer Charlton, Mackall
| & Anderson for complainant Barrow &
| Osborne for defendant; j. II. Craig VS..
| bark Saehelm, Lester & Ravenel for libel
liant, J. II. Cronk for respondent.
Thursday, Jan. PA. j. Preston VS.
| Board of Commissioners of Glynn county
Garrard, Meldrim & Newman for plain
tiff, Atkinson & Dunwoody for defendant;
| United States VS.. A. f. Holt postoffice
case, United States attorney; United States
| VS.. p. H. Mangle, violation internal reve-
nue. laws; United States VS.. Len Gailliard
violation internal revenue laws.
Friday, Jan. 13-United States VS. Horace
Pierce, violation internal revenue laws;
| United States VS. MeElveen & Grower
violation internal revenue laws; United
| States VS.. j. II. and William Jones, viola
ton internal revenue laws; United States
VS.. B. II. Pope, violation pension laws.
Monday. Jan. 16-London Valiant VS.
Florida Central and Peninsular Railroad
/ Company, Brantley & Bennett, Garrard,
Meldrim & Newman for plaintiff,
| Crovatt q Whitfield, Denmark,
Adams & Freeman for defendant
| A. j. Burney VS.. Florida Central and Pc
ninsular Railroad Company Lester &
| RaVenel, SymmeS a Bennett for plaintiff,
| Crovatt & Whitfield Denmark,
Adams & Freeman for defend
ant; Priscilla McIver VS. Flor
ida Central and Peninsular Railroad Com
pany, Brantley & Bennett and Garrard,
Meldrim and Newman for plaintiff, Gro
| watt & Whitfield for defendant
Tuesday, Jan. H. 1S99.-United States
VS.. lot of jewelry. fancy goods, etc, Unit
ed States attorney for United States, Er-
| a f,r
| Wednesday, Jan. 1S-John II. Polhl VS..
Florida Central and Peninsular Railroad
Company Atkinson & Dunwody, Cortland
Symmes and Lester & Ravenel for plain
tiffs, Denmark, Adams x Freeman, Gro
watt & Whitfield for defendant; A. Il.
Sholes vs.. Southern Directory Company
Twiggs & Oliver for plaintiff, Denmark
Adams & Freeman for defendant
Thursday, Jan. l9-Thomas c. Jefords
VS. Fidelity Mutual Insurance Company
Erwin, duBignon & Chisholm for plain
tiff Barrow & Osborne for defendant
Friday, Jan DE. Borda & Son. ct al,
VS. Charles II. Dixon, ct al. Marion Err
win. Hall & Wimberly for complainant
Saussy & Saussy, Barrow q Osborne, Err
win, duBignon 4 Chisholm for defend
ants.
Monday, Jan. 23-David Robinson vs..
Southern Railway Company, l.. L. Thomas
for plaintiff. Goodyear & Kay for defend
ant j IL. Milliken VS.. Southern Railway
Company, l.. l.. Thomas for plaintiff
Goodyear & Kay for defendant.
|