New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1899-03-18
D1 ACKMATL TRIED, HE SAYS
ARcHROLD ACCUSES RICE AT
STANDARD OIL HEARING.
r,,,,Rxs MADE BY TIE wrTNEss-A1L
,,-r.s CHARGES coNrRADrcTEp-TAK-
ING OF TESTIMONY 10 Re con

r>,9 81. TESTIMONY 10 RE con
r1>rED TO-DAY.
. ~, dsDo.i.ions OF witnesses IN the
IT. .,.,..r,rt ~ court brought against the
scuoH -. nj, ,-,-,,n,,v and John d. Rockefeller rs
s'Al..s.,+ for alleged failure TO comply with the
" ,vr ordering the dissolution OF the STANDARD
on -. ,e the state o. Ohio was resumed at me
OA - r7o,se yesterday morning. Allan j. hrlnS-
hoH s, US appointed as master 10y the Su-
me- court O, the State Of ohio. presided Inc
pr ,v.ealth OF Ohio was represented by A''or-
O'' - Monet M FaEE and : w. Bennett.
ne KLINE and NJ r Elliott We're attorneys
We s..0fars OE Company Aside from these
lo = other person present directly Interested IN
'h - was George j Rice. who has entered
'' s,..s against the Standard on COMPANY
" se,irs. various railroads for alleged i"esaI
- So with the standard on Company.
CO., o., bias nj nrey1ous proceedings between the
-, OIL company and the courts OF ohio
-. criticised the business methods or the
s,,-s OF Company bur at Yesterday nearing
s.1,u-- business methods We're sharply attacAe" by
-. n A~.hno,f - the Standard on company
a. .--rnolf who was the only witness examined
- enc morning session. attempted 10 prove that
. 49, .~,.f +o bIackmaN the standard OF Com
~ o,- o. &Noo Mr.. Archhod was frequently
f,.,.as i- -ae delivery Of his testimony by oI-
80 lawyers and several lively Tits occurred
-. A--hh5iG began his testimony by explaining
,hs. DO WAS secretary or me S'ahoaIu '4 rus l'
-, rs- 90 was ~ existence and one OF the lqui-
80 trustees when under the order Of the courts
r d.sso we'd
NJ lf.-r.-. was assisted IN his cross-examina-
49, ~ W. Bennett OF Ohio and ". L Flags.
=, ,A's -'-y 70 was thought that John d. hocke-
s.rs- vo..f appear and testify N his own Oeha-l'
,-f ,e 5t ust The entire day was consumed IL
taxing tne tas'imony OF MI. AFchoola.
T.. testimony was regarded as important because
10 vas ln direct opposition 90 the testimony given
-.,,s. tho Standard of Company by George D.
r.
NJ A--hhad was asked by Nj. Elliott II he had
~ had any conversation with Mr.. Rice. Mr.
...t..t -.-nas Wfth much spirit nat ne had.
Ar-1'.- w., ss -. 81, o., 80, Standard
lie SAID --a Rice had tried 70 sell 20 'le S''il'''iU
m COMPANY his plant at Marietta
u" - .s .e.. r,4,. had oouad On him
NJ ArH.2 s"'o INA. '''', - - - U .''.''
A. No 9 Broadway ~ ls9 and onered MS plant 20
ne STANDARD He then related how Nj Rice had
tot him ta.' ne coDi' cause '"V 0'1',.''.I
Cornra-- % lose ~ least >-'''." a year KY means
y. t,..g.-f,-s against tne company some OF which
were taei peAl'As an" o'"''9 N'''-N Il" '--@ go
oorternQ alton.
A''o''..S ~ sac 49,. e.. ~. ~. .,,. ,,-,c, ~
te STANDARD l- ~.-'p"''' " -.
d -, ....... 49,. Interstate Commerce Com
seo O. 49,. =. ,-,,,l5 o,,ororize
~. STANDARD oil interests
NJ A--r+.-s Went on TO say that Nj. Rice
wanted 81 ' IN cash ""' 49, - -,
ysars Ii also offered. according 20 Ny. ArchooId'
q 80 .--. .,s- saaor m 81 ooo He also said
no. worth H Pc ma" '-'' u. go -
u, . ~ r,...-. ..5 h. repuaiated NJ Rices propo-
TO-, a.. asked MIN where tho Standard OF COM
paay o.-'- -. A.. A~o.hora ns-a became
~ go .-o. NJ P,co. n-opositiop was not
,rr~a and