The daily chieftain. [volume] (Vinita, Ind. Ter. [Okla.]) 1898-1902, 1899-04-25
BOY cHolRs.
Dinculties In Training That Suggest .
school For Choir Masters.


/ George j. Brewer, who was a
member Of boy choir in England
when he was 2 years old ard who
for many years has been a trainer
of boy choirs in England, Germany
and America, says that there is a
prejudice against such choirs in this
country for which there is good
ground. In The Church Economist t
he says
1.-THE choirs are termed harsh in
vocal effort, insufficient in culture,
incapable of the spirit of true wor-
ship and churchliness, while the
boys voices are termed immature.
This feeling is almost entirely due
to the woeful lack of educated boy
choir masters-men who understand
boy nature and the boys voice.
Many capable choir masters who
have come to much success with the
adult voice ruin the boys voice by
training it by adult methods.
The cultivation of the boy voice
is special art, and a most delicate
one. Case after case has come to
my notice of choir masters, with lit
tie or no knowledge assuming d.
rection of a boy choir. The newly
engaged choir master may be an ad-
mirable organist-once in awhile a
capable boy choir master-but how
rarely is he bothi This state of af-
fairs is not entirely due to oversight
or ignorance. Thirty years ago
there was but one boy choir in New
York city, and 60 years ago the fea-
ture was rarity in England. The
innovation would seem to have been
a curse as we'll as a blessing. In
America the average country town
cannot afford to hire boy choristers,
or, as is more often the case, boys
with good voices are not to be had.
In the suburban town the boy choir
is received with fair favor, as a rule,
and in the city there is abundant
opportunity for well organized and
well trained choirs. There is a
wealth of material from which to
choose and wide open purse with
which to procure that material So
it is small wonder that the opulent
Episcopal churches in New York
city, with their daily rehearsal, have
notable choirs.
SIN England no choir master is
considered capable who has not long
been under the shadow of church
as a'chorister. In America the rec
ords of the choir masters are scant
indeed. What is needed is choir
masters school-rather a boy choir
masters school.
Now as to the grade of music
sung by the average American boy
choir; it is too often the up to date,
modern church music, anthems in
particular. Some of these are un-
speakably crude and unchurchly
and insult the sanctuary in which
they are sung. How many parish
toner's are even specifically ac-
quainted with the glorious compost
tions of the old masters of church
music-Purcell, Crotch and a dozen
othersi / have brought TO perfect
test in my own choir the efficacy of
the work of these old composers.
Their compositions are not beyond
the scope of the boy choir. 1t is all
a matter of constant and unremit-
ting training. Again, the chanting
of the psalms, in itself a difficult
feat, by whatever method of point
ing, is often disregarded, producing
the most wretohed results, whereas
all that is needed is careful training
at every rehearsal. My boys chant
any psalm at sight, merely because
of endless going over at the rehear-
sails, held not every day, but three
times a week.
1.-The boy choir is essentially suit
ed to therendering of church music,
and, in my judgment, is to be pre-
ferred to an adult quartet or chorus.
Boy choirs in this country are grow
ing in number, and, alas, their
merit is not growing in proportion!
The almost appalling question,
What theni cannot be answered.
1.-THE boy choir master must be the
most tactful kind of disciplinarian.
There is everything in securing a
rsfined class of boys. The choir
must have a distinct moral tone, and