Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1899-10-27

were replied Judge Booth, amid luud
laughter
ounter-weu. I want it to 20 In the
Reed smout. 81 Provo. wau noyt ok
nmlncd. iiis testimony wac DO line
with Judge Booths,
EDITOR GLOVE TEsriFfEs.
james Glove. editor Provo Enquirer
testified that Mr Graham WIS rrputed
90 BE- n married man with n wife and
family in Provo. Under Cforr-oNaminu-
tlon tho witness stated that D. could
not swear 90 having seen SIR. AMI MrH.
Graham ON the street for The past
F ". n.ahau. testified that b. re-
sided on Eleventh south between
Fourth and FIFTH East streets. Know
MrHs Gr1hnm. She lived next door Co
bun for about two yeurH She left th0
place inai spring go had rontCd The
place. which adi0ius hia. and had paid
tho rent Co Mr Gmhnm. Mrs. Graham
had four Ur five chldrHn, tho YuunrHHt
~ which Wnr about nvr. Had seen
tmhlm Uu Waterloo ear but never
saw MIN Fct on near Mis-. gfah1n'H
house. Mn Graham was the rcuutod
wife 10 John g. Graham. About eighteen
months ago Mr Graham introduced her
b. witness 1a bis wife. n was on Che
Waterloo car
In answer 20 Mr. King witness sald
TINT Mrs. Graham was known as n
polyFqmuus wife the same aa other wD.
mon De knew o. polygamous wife OF
Mr. D. NJ bishop said ahs know SIR
Graham nllghtlY Know Mrs. Graham
quite we'll She was known nH the wife
on John e. Graham. Mrf Graham had
i've childrrn whom nho lived near wit
moss. and they were called Graham.
Under REORGANIZATION Mrs Bishop
90 hHI HIa an
nt Mrs GmhumH house. nor had over
beard Mr Graham hold the ludy in
Question out uH BILE vito.
Mrs. Fred q. Graham. daughter or tho
last two witnesses. Hnid Hhc hld UNDER
stood the Mrs. Graham living near her
folks to be the wife NJ John e.. Graham.
Had seen Mr.. Graham two ur three
times u month on Waterloo car,
Mr. bishop was recalled ana In an
Hwfr On Sir. Guutor said he saw Mr.
Graham once nt Mrs Gruhnma back
door tio thought Il was iu 1885. but q
might have been this year
Here Mr. Guntrr called for Sarah
Potter Graham and Mrs Ellsworth 81
pnysou. There heiug no response Mr.
Guntcf said. eve tried 90 got these Wit
nraHoH but failed. one iF the wife ~
Mr Graham. and the other the mid
Wife"
Don't testify 20 That. brother" said
NMNNNN MNNNH wv MNNN WHNNN
Mt uuntcr Hnid he ala not intond TO
No testify
BELIEVES THE FACTS.
Amasa Potter. father Of Sarah Potter.
or Graham. said be- know Sarah Potter,
but didn't know anything about the
Graham part of g." She had children,
but be- ala NOT know whose they wcru.
His daughter loft pnyH0u r. week ago,
but De- didn't know whore she had gone
90. Hadn't the least idea where she
was. Was ut hi1 daughters house
nh0ut two weeks ago. Saw q baby
there. could not say whose baby u
was. Had no Idea, u don't IKE %
rive theories. I like 10 rlvo facts" said
the witness
Chnncy Evans. a resident Of East Wa
tcrluo. knew re- woman who went hy the
name 0f MIR Graham She formerly re-
sided ln Waterloo Saw John q. era
ham come out NJ the yard whore Mra,
iiruhnm lives once. Frequently saw him
German Ellsworth. or paynon. said
hO knew Sarah Potter Never heard
anyone call her Graham. Was IN her
house two wcekn ago hxlrr % stove pipe.
Didn't sec % baby. Tho folks were IN
one room ana be- m another Here the
prosecution rested and court adjourned
until 2 o'clock
AAhEN iNlfFN AbN VEHEMENT
This afternoon Judge King made an
extended argument ON motion 10 dis
miss. u being cuntcndrd hy counsel
that the evidence was unHufilClUnt To-
hrid 'hr defendant Mr. Guntcr op-
posed the motion. and hia honor took
the matter under ndviHemcnt and un-
nounevd he would render decision On
Monday.
WHAT COMPLAINT ALLEGES.
The complaint. signed by Charles
Mostyn owen. charges air Graham
with unlawful cohabltntion. committed
ln this county, between January lat.
1898 ana May 18Th, 1892. with MARY A.
Graham ana Snrnh Potter.