The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1899-11-07
IT DIDN'T TAKE LONG
For Emma Miller to Tire of Her
Marriage.
A DAY WAS SUFFICIENT
That Is the Allegation Her Husband
Makes IN His Complaint - Walter
Westbrook Alleges Cruelty
and Desertion.


complaint in a suit for divorce which
was filed yesterday in the district
court are we'll founded Emma Miller
tired of the marriage relation very
quickly, for according to the complaint
the couple lived together less than a
day.
: The plaintiff in the suit is Ionic MIL
Ter, who alleges that he was married
to the defendant, Emma Miller, Tn
June 10, 1895. at Saltwater. Mimi, ard
that on the same day she abandoned
and deserted him against his will and
consent and has ever since contirued
to live separate and apart from min.
The plaintiff asks for decree and that
he be released from all obligations.
Walter r. Westbrook began suit in
the district court yesterday for divorce
from his wife. Eona L.. West5roof. al
leging cruelty and desertion. The
plaintiff alleges that he and The de-
PENDANT were married at Wnstfiel1,
Pa, on June %, 1856; that on Sept. u,
1898. in the city of Elmira, N. Y. the
defendant, wilfully and without PROV
ocation. treated the plaintiff in cruel
and inhuman manner and thereuDon
deserted and abandoned him, contnu-
ing since that time to live s.oarale
and apart from him without provoca-
ton and against his win and consent.
The plaintiff asks that both parties to
the suit be released from all marital
obligations.
In the suit for foreclosure OF Zen
in which the NJ. J. Connell Lumber
company Is the plaintiff and Charles
r. Burkett. Ollie j. Burkett, the Big
Blackfoot Milling company, A. Saner
and /. Kruger are the defendants,
the Big Blackfoot Milling company
filed separate answer in the distIict
court yesterday.
admits that it claims some interest
in the premises mentioned in the &C IL
plant in the case by virtue Of Il len
thereon. but denies that it Is a pre-
tended lien or that the interest or lien
of this defendant is subject or subor
dinate to the lien Of the plaintiff. All
other allegations of the complaint are
denied as a whole.
For further answer this defendant
sets up that Charles r. Burkett and
Ollie J. Burkett became indebted to it
In the sum of s14197 on Aug. n, 1898,
for lumber and building material which
were used in the construction Of the
buildings referred to in the complaint;
that on Oct %, 1898, this defendant
filed notice and claim Of lien against
the defendants. Charles r. and Ollie
Burkett. and the property described
in the complaint and that on April %,
1899, this defendant commenced suit in
the district court for foreclosure of the
lien, which action is still pending and
undetermined. -.....
The Big Blackfoot company there
fore asks that this suit and its own
suit in foreclosure be consolidated and
the respective rights of the several
parties be determined and adjudicated
or that any decree which may be rem
dered may be subject to decree rem
dered in the action begun by this de-
PENDANT and that this defendant be
awarded its costs.
Two suits to revive judgment We're
filed in the district court yesterday by
James A. Murray. In one, John G.
Hammer and his wife, Julia p. Ham
mer. are named as defendants. The
complaint alleges that on Sept. 26, 1890.
the plaintiff obtained judgment against
the defendants for 81, 1880; that no part
of the judgment has been paid and he
therefore asks for the amount of the
of 10 per cent per annum, the whole
amounting to sS,277.77
In the second suit, the plaintiff. Muir
ray, asks for judgment against Bryant
H. Peters, again whom he alleges
that he obtained a judgment for
$946 on Feb. 10. 1891, no part of which
has been paid and which, with interest,
now amounts to $1,7S3.12