The Wheeling daily intelligencer. [volume] (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1865-1903, 1899-08-23

Patrick Mckinley rebate on $780, double
assessment 1896,
Flth Ward ReaI'Estate.
Petition Of John ArbenZ REDUCTION s.g i,S % G.
Ms. 4. q. Young, rejected.
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company re-
jected.
Personal
George Frederick, reduced TO IS;
James A. Henry's petition regarding me
removal OF stone wall at the south end OF
Main street bridge referred to council
Sixth Ward Real Estate.
West VirRinia Savings and Building AS
ISOLATION. reduction 70 500 granted on lot
"a, division d. Caldwell; no rebate.
John Boyce. reduced $500 on improve
ments TO lot 81, Eolf's addition. -
Edward scheileabeEgeT, reduced TO wv;
George Rourle. reduced 800 on improve
.'' TeTranco Mckee, reduced to 800; no re-
jacob steuerhagle, reduced $50 on Inn
proVements. lots 1915, caldwelrs,
r. Friesmuth, rejected,
Spears Axle Works, rejected.
w. r. Rumble, rejected.
Clara II. Bodtey, rejected.
Mary 3. Werner, rejected.
Johanna EberYein, rejected,
Casper EmmeFt. rejected.
H. w. Naseman, rejected.
r. Raymond. rejected.
Mrs, Elizabeth Carr, rejected.
Personal.
Fred Koehler. granted rebate for 1885
and 1876: time he was out OF city.
Wheeling Steel and Iron Co., rebate OF
double assessment on S13,l6O for 1888.
Seventh Ward Real Estate.
Petition OF George Johnson, reduced $500
on Improvements.
George Johnson. reduced $50 on lot;
George Zilles, jr., reduced 8, 400 on lot.
sessment lot II, square S, Gllchirsts addi-
lion; rebate granted for 1881 and lSss on
6. Forbes. reduced 500 on improvements.
'f HOOK OF ordered iS corrected for lot 50.
II. d. welsgerber, reduced 800 on ground
lots Il and 10, Biochs addition; no Fep9te'
George Bowman, reduced 800 on I'M
provements.
Catherine Barr. reduced $500 on I'M
provements, west half lot 3. D. zane's adj
dition. -,
provements. lots rs Marshali's addition.
NJ NJ. BeAil, reduced 500 on Improve
ments. lot q. b. Zane's. addition.
NJ L. Etzler, reduced 500 on improve
Mrs RS Thomas Prince. granted rebate on
800 on lot 8, D. Zane's addition, for 1885,
and reduction OF 800 for 1899. 49,.
81 L. EtZter, rejected. on South Huron
L. ~. NJ. Hervey. rejected.
]. W. Glasscock. rejected.
Elminn Little, rejected.
W. G. Jones. rejected.
Jessie H. Logan. rejected.
Theo. Schreiber's estate rejected
Francis Laupp. rejected.
Aphella Rodgers, rejected.
Personal.
]. n. Frasher, rejected.
Eighth Ward Real Estate.
ps,IiIon Of Henry ]. Kratz, reduced 500
on S1IJth half lot I, square IS, Ritchle.
Fred ". Colmnr, George and Moses
Bell, reduced to El,eOO on lots and TO-
square s. cam =.
ducdon on improvements sOu1h HHtt ~
u Ka Ge1 Il Ford. reduction of 800 on lots
Is, u, ". square le. .,o.
William Ratcline. reuucuon OF WV on
improvements. lot Is, square ID -.
William Radcliffe reduction OF $SVO on
improvements. lot ;, square q.
v MarSchner. reduction OF $5O0, On I'M.
provements, 46 feet OF lot J. sf ss66 -
Henry Blum, reduction OF &sOO on im-
proyements, south half lot 2, square y,
Henry Blum, reduction OF WV IN loI'
south half lot 2, square l6 49,.
II. c. Nolte, reduction OF %O on itn-
provements, lot s, square 10. -.
A. c. Fisher reduction or $SW on I'M
proVements, lot s., La Grange, -,
W. II. Schanion, reduction OF SSIO on I'M
proYements. lot ., old plat; .a
Wood Bros. Planning Mil Co, granted
rebate on 5000 for lsST-is9s: assessment for
1899, fi,GSo.
Personal.
Albert Foster. granted rebate Of a.09;
double assessment 1888.
James FltZslmmons, rejected.
Mrs. Louis yocke. retectedi
Mrs. Casper Horner. rejected.
". j. Lantry, rejected. -,,.
Wheeling Bridge & Terminal Railway
Company, rejected.
John link, rejected.
Caroline Null, rejected.
Mary F. HaZlett. rejected.
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company re-
jected. ,..,.,
Herman Andrews, rejected.
James a. FitZsimmons, rejected,
Margaret HelInbright, relectea.
Mrs Louisa Woke, rejected:
A. q, Fisher, rejected; out lots
a. c. Fisher, rejected: I9i %; IA HT I1Ilis
H. BinkmRn estate, MuheHnlha hiIlA3
man, eXecutrix, rejected
The report was adopted as presented.
James A. Henry's application, mnde
to the board, to tear out parts of the
southern portion OF the stone wall OF
the Main street stone bridge, was
brought up. but was ruled out of order
Later the matter was taken up and,
after a reference to the city solicitor
had been made and SCI aside, there was
a motion to lay on the table. which was
defeated, and then the matter was
again referred to the city solicitor.