The Stark County Democrat. [volume] (Canton, Ohio) 1833-1912, 1899-09-12
"A BUSY WEEK
FOR JUDGES.
Court Assignment For Septem,
ber Term Has Been Issued.
TRIAL OF F. p. KIBLER
ON Disbarment Proceedings Instituted
Against Him Will Come Up Monday
Afternoon Before Three
Judges.

The assignments have been made for
4 the first week of common pleas court,
z beginning next Monday. While case
( has been assigned to Judge Taylor's
| court for Monday afternoon, 1t is Tin
derstood that he will be engaged with
\ Judges McCarty and Smith in hearing
n the dsbarment proceedings instituted
j against Frank p. Kibler, which have
II been set for that time.
\ Judge T. T. McCarty will preside in
court room No. 1 and Judge L. H. Tay-
lor in court room No. during the week:
COURT ROOM NO. 1.
Monday forenoon, September 8, 1S99.-
Hearing motion docket and impaneling
grand jury. In the matter of the char
= Ees against Frank p. Kibler. Blum ct
i,Sal VS. Blum ct al. Longabaugh VS. Can
'i3ton Cycle Mfg. Co. Dannemiller & Sons
z VS. Myer ct AL
Tuesday, Sept. 19-Patton VS. Albert ct
al. Wymer VS. Wymer. Thomas VS.
Merley. The revocation of public al
ley Home Savings and Loan Company
VS. Hart ct al.
Wednesday, Sept. 20-Powelson VS.
Lytle. Central Savings Bank Co. VS.
whippey ct al. Owen VS. Mishler Pot
terry Co. Ewart VS. French ct al. Rob
inson VS. Robinson ct al.
Thursday, Sept. 21-Ploesser VS. Ploes-
ser. Kerch ct al VS. Sinnock ct al. Cen
trail Savings bank company VS. White
man ct al. Douds VS. Guest ct al. Ham
iel VS. Paul ct al.
Friday. Sept. 22-Page vs Palmer ct
al. Central Savings Bank Co. VS. Weld
man ct al. Folger VS. Union Holiness
Association. McLain VS. Sanford ct al.
Root VS. Root.
COURT ROOM NO. g.
Monday, September 18, 1S99-Hearing
motion docket. Piero VS. Canton Buggy
& Gear Co. ct al. Williams VS. Waynes-
bur Brick & Clay Co., ct al. Schlaf-
ley VS. Wampler ct al.
Tuesday, Sept. 19-Hemperly VS. Po-
cock ct AL Jeauty VS. Hess ct al. Druc-
kenbrod VS. Holl. Douds VS. Guest.
Hammel VS. Hammel.
Wednesday Sept 20-Canton Surgical
& Dental Chair Co. VS. Gould ct al.
Sprankle VS. Ripple. Central Savings
Bank Co. VS. Blum ct al. Schwalm VS.
Betz Cherry Valley Iron Works VS.
Bonnot Mfg. Co ct al.
Thursday Sept 21-Central Savings
Bank Co. VS. Blum ct al. Bean VS. Alb
bott ct al. Greenwald VS. Greenwald et
al. Putnam VS. Putman's exrs. ct al
Christian VS. Eicher, ct al.
Friday, Sept 22-Home Savings and
Loan company against Lucer
Loan company VS. Lucas. Webb's Exr
We Zwahlen, ct al. Meyer VS. Grant
Shertzer VS. Holm. Stahler VS. Stahler
ct al.
TO SET ASIDE WILL.
Attorneys John H. Sponseller and
Baldwin & Shields filed a petition in
common pleas court Saturday afternoon
in which Susan Harper and others are
plaintiffs and Abraham Bowers and
others are defendants. The action is
brought to have the will of Mary Bowers
set aside and declared null and void as
plaintiffs claim they have an interest
in the estate and allege tlat defendant
Abraham Bowers influenced the deceas'
ed in the making of the will and dis
position of her property. The court is
therefore asked to declare the will null
and void
DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS.
Ella L. Gates, of Massillon, begar
suit in common pleas court, Saturday
afternoon, against John Gates for di'
vorce and alimony. Extreme cruelty
and gross neglect are the causes alleged
in the petition which was filed by AT.
torney w. S. Mutt.
WANTS A DIVORCE.
Rosa Dickerhoff has begun proceed
ings in common pleas court against
William e. Dickerhoff for divorce and
alimony. Abandonment is charged
Attorney j. II. Sponseller filed the petit
ton.