The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1899-10-29
BEFORE JUDGE LINDSAY
A Day Given to Results of Un.
happy Marriages.
DROVE HER FROM HOME
Sarah Boland Charged Her Husband
With Cruelty-A Decree Granted
He Accused Her OF Habitual
Drunkenness.

Included in an unusual lot of bust
ness that came before Judge Lindsay
yesterday was a number of divorce
cases, which came up in various forms.
The uncommon thing of a defendant
securing a decree of divorce on a de-
fault was the experience in the case
Of Thomas Boland against Sarah b.
land. The former sued on the ground
of habitual drunkenness and Mrs. 3D.
land asked for divorce and alimony
on a cross complaint and answer,
charging her husband with extreme
cruelty. She got an order for ali
mony some days ago and then Boland
dismissed his complaint and left the
state, and was not on hand when his
wife applied for a decree of divorce
yesterday, and got it. Her testimony
was that she married the plaintiff on
May Is, 1898, and three days later he
began abusing her and beating her
and kept it up until few months ago,
When he drove her from home. Mrs.
Boland denied that she was in the
habit of getting drunk She was rep
resented by Attorney Sinclair.
In the divorce case Of Victoria Dlu-
bola against Louis Dlubola a motion
for alimony and counsel fees was ar
gued before Judge Lindsay yesterday,
and was by him taken under advise
ment until Monday. The action had
been brought in Department I. Of the
court, but the order to show cause
why the defendant should not be re-
quired to pay alimony had been made
by Judge Clancy, upon the motion of
Attorney Broderson, representing the
plaintiff. When the matter came up
for hearing before Judge Lindsay yes
terday the defendants attorney, John
w. Cotter, moved the court to dis
miss the order to show cause because
it had been issued by Judge Clancy
without authority, as the Judge of the
department Of court in which the suit
was brought was himself in the city
and should have issued the order if
one was issued Mr.. Cotter also ar
gued that there had not sufficient
showing been made to warrant the is
suance of the order. Judge Lindsay
said that so far as the question of au-
thority of the other judge to issue
the order was concerned the objection
was not we'll taken, and as to the
question of alimony. he said he would
make an order on Monday.
Alice Olson yesterday petitioned the
court again for another restraining or
der to prevent her husband, Samuel
Olson, from getting away with all his
property and cash and thereby de-
feat her suit for alimony. In an affi-
davit she represented to the court that
on Oct 26, the day on which she
brought her action FOR divorce, an Or
der was issued enjsialing the defendant
from interfering with or disposing of
about $1,000 which he had on deposit
at Clarks bank and $500 which he had
in the First National bank. Before the
order was served on him, however,
he had withdrawn the money in
Clarl1's bank and had given the First
National bank certificate to one E.
Peterson for safe keeping and then
left the state, going to Minnesota.
Mrs Olson asked the court to issue
an order on the First National bank
and Peterson to hold on to the $500
and the certificate of deposit
A default was entered in the case
of Alice Duevell against James w.
Duevell and the plaintiffs proofs We're
set for hearing next Tuesday. A de-
fault was also entered in the case of
Marie Schroeder against Hugo S.
Schrepfer, and the testimony of the
plaintiff will be taken next Saturday.
The hearing of testimony in the
divorce cases of Joseph A. Connell
a paipSt lane NJ Coppp1l and