Chariton courier. (Keytesville, Chariton County, Mo.) 1878-current, 1899-12-01

notice ordered to be served, ana
cause continued.
S. w. Mcconnell VS.. Abner Ais
man ct al, partition; continued to
await sheriff S final report.
Elias Turner VS.. Chas. J. Turner,
debt; death of defendant suggested,
and cause revived in the name of L.
H. Herring, administrator, who en-
tiers his voluntary appearance, and
cause continued.
Anna A. Herthell VS.. Mahala Ev-
ans, ejectment; continued.
W. H. Thornburgh vs.. school dis
trict 3-56-2I. Charlton county, Mo,
debt; jury waived, trial by the court, and
judgment rendered for defendant;
cause appealed to the supreme court.
T. E. Mackay. administrator, VS..
D, C. Basey ct al, suit on note;
continued.
John n. Hencke VS.. VIM. A. Smell,
ejectment; trial by jury, and verdict
for plaintiff for possession of premises
sued for, damages assessed at ST., and
value of monthly rents and profits
fixed at one cent.
A. E. Severance VS.. M. J. Sever
ance, administrative appeal from
probate court, debt; trial by jury, and
verdict for plaintiff in the sum of
$3.50.
E. D. Moore VS.. Tracy & Hop
per, suit on note on assessment loan
company; trial by jury, and at the
close of evidence for the plaintiff, de-
fendant offers a demurrer thereto.
which is sustained by the court;
whereupon plaintiff takes nonsuit,
with leave to move to set the same
aside.
Elizabeth Null VS.. Sarah E. Ross,
damages; same. This Is the sensa-
tional case in which Mrs. Null brought
suit against Mrs Ross for S., 900 act
ual and S. 900 exemplary damages
for alleged alienation of the plaintiff 5
husbands affections. Mrs. Null
took a nonsuit for the reason that the
court excluded, in her judgment. COM
petent testimony on the part Of the
plaintiff, hence she has appealed to the
supreme court.
Lois Kennedy VS.. Sam'l Fleetwood,
appeal-unlawfu detainer; continued
on the application of and at the cost
of defendant. L. Beneche.
First National bank of Brunswick
VS.. John c. Burrus ct al, suit to set
aside deed; plaintiff takes nonsuit.
American Harrow Co. VS.. George
T. Hecke, appeaI-suit on note;
plaintiff takes nonsuit with leave to
withdraw note sued on by leaving
copy.
John E. Dismukes VS.. Jesse Will
liams, ejectment; judgment for plaint-
if for want of answer by defendant for
possession of premises sued for, dam
ages assessed at 81 and value Of
monthly rents and profits fixed at 81;
execution and restitution to issue.
Kate n. Welch VS.. E B. Welch, Jr.,
appeal-debt; motion to affirm judg-
ment of justice for want of prosecu-
ton sustained; judgment for defend
ant against plaintiff and her securi-
ties on appeal bond,
A. Dickson VS.. F. NJ. Lewis ct al.
injunction; by agreement of parties,
temporary injunction is dissolved;
cause dismissed, and costs adjudged
against the plaintiff attorneys fee of
$40 allowed in favor of C. c. Bigger, !
defendants attorney, to be taxed as
costs in lieu OF all other costs AMI
damages, which are hereby waived
Chaprlan Bros. VS.. F. E. Herring,
continued on the ap-
plication of and at the cost of de-
fendant because of sickness in his
family.
7. A. Merchant VS.. n, O. Tate, un-
lawful detainer; the proceedings in
this cause having been enjoined by an
injunction proceeding in the case of
Tate VS.. Merchant, this cause is con-
tInued