The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1899-02-26
ton ct AL, Frank Boucher VS.. j. B. Pow

ton ct al, Frank Boucher VS.. J. B. Pow
ers ct al
Feb. 2S-Lee W. Foster VS.. Jefferson
McCauley, Eclipse Stove company VS..
| Patrick H. Regain, J. Roller VS.. j. Fred
Loeber, Edward Rowe vs.. William Rod
da ct al, William r. Benham VS.. Stand
ard Publishing company, W. H. Stokes
VS.. Charles Fisher ct al.
| March 1T. ]. Bordeaux VS.. john Nc
| Cormick Dennis Driscoll VS.. Michael
| Mccormick ct al, James A. Murray VS..
Elizabeth Walker. Kate Clarity VS.. In
ter Mountain Pubi/hing company, Good
Luck Shoe and Clothing company VS..
Fred Holbrook Louis Kaufman VS.. Nell
son McGarvin ct al.
| March 2--First National bank OF
Butte vs. John E. Bray ct al, Charles
H. Nickel VS.. Joseph Graf, James L.
| O'Donnell VS.. Johanna De PAUL. ct al.
William NJ. hewitt VS.. T. ]. Lynde ct
| al, Frank A. Pratt ct al. VS.. Sam Alt
| man.
May 3-May Niedenhofen. admins
March 3--May Niedenhofen, admins
tratrix, vs. J. P. Young, Montana Union
Railway company VS.. G. H. Hanklns,
| Montana Union Railway company VS..
John Andy, May Niedenhofen, admins
tratrix, VS.. D. c. Porter, E. V. Smalley
| vs. George H. Savage, Felix Bellinger,
administrator, VS.. Boston & Montana
| company.
A motion for new trial of the case
of John F. Forbis against the Grand
Opera House company was presented to
Judge Clancy and was taken under ad-
vsement. The case had been tried by
referee, who found for Mr.. Forbis for
$500 due him for services in tax case
of Silas f. King against the county
treasurer in which it was sought to OBJ
tain a deed to the opera house.
Gamma FAINT yesterday commenced
suit for divorce against William L.
FAINT on the grounds of desertion and
support. They were married in
Butte on May IA, 1890. and have one
child, a girl. four years of age. 1t is
alleged that in January, 1898, the de-
PENDANT deserted the plaintiff and has
contributed nothing to her support
since. He has property valued at 81
$50 and earns s1oO a month. For two
years he has been habitually drunk.
Mrs. FAINT says her husband at pres
ent has possession of the child and re-
fuses her permission to see it. She
wants a divorce, the custody of the
child and asks permission to resume
her maiden name. which was Gamma
| Chauvn. The defendant was formerly
d
| ture company, but is now hack driver.
Judge Smith yesterday set cases for
trial in department l. as follows:
March 2. Mrs. John F. French VS..
James McFayden: March g. Felix Nc
Alevy vs. p. H. Regain March s, Villa
| Bessol VS.. r. f. Hogarth. Mary Nc
Donald VS.. Jessie c. Knox J. H. Ma
loney ct al. VS.. Harley N. Merwin;
March 7. Amos Booth VS.. J. McGovern,
Mary Mcdonald VS.. Jessie c. Knox. Hen
nv MuntZer VS.. Andrew Jonas ct al;
March 5, Mary Ann Hurley VS.. Patrick
O'Neill. Elizabeth Coleman VS.. Oliver
| N. Perry ct al: March g. Montana Bill
Posting and A. D. Sign Service VS.. w.
E. Kendrck ct al. c. f. Dutton vs.
George A Cobban ct al: March 10. Eliz-
abeth Davis VS.. Catherine Evans, Susan
| Mitchell VS.. Harry Blumkin, Moses Be
| mott VS.. School district No. l. S. B. coun-
ty; March -, H. L. Haunt ct al. VS..
| Elias Simmngton ct al, Ruth F. Leg
gat ct al. VS.. Butte City Water compa-
n.y. March IA. John Mccormick VS.. J.
B. Johnson ct al: March IS, A. A. De-
kay ct al VS. Nicholas Hughes: March
16, C. ]. Smith & Co. VS.. ]. c. Mott,
Ben Baker VS.. Butte City Water com
pany. The cases of the Volunteer Min
ing company VS.. Butte, Anaconda &
! Pacific Railway company were dismiss
ed as settled.
J. f. Oppenhoimer yesterday filed an
answer in court to the damage suits
of James A. Myers John Zelmer and
NJ. II. Shadingcr, which grew out OF
the collapse of the York block. Open
heimer denied that it was through any
neglect on his part that the building
fell and the men injured. He says the
accident occurred through carelessness
of the plaintiffs and their fellow serv-
ants, and claims that D. x. Whitney
was not engaged by him as superin-
tendent, hut that he worked as fore
man under Fl. M. Patterson, the archi-
teCt.
In the damage suit of L. Rey against
the Inter Mountain Publishing COM
| pany a motion to re-taX costs was ma de
by the plaintiffs attorney and granted
by the court The defendants had pre-
scented an excessive claim for witness
fees and also put in an item for $40 as
Jurors fees. which are paid by the
| state.
o,,t IN I,,yy