The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1899-10-17

that that isn't north and south lode
and I don't want any threshng of ole
straw. Well, the objection is over
ruled" said the court.
| MT. COtter stated that, in order tt
save time he would make the offer al
| the moment to put Messrs Sizer, Tower
| Kelly and other witnesses on the stant
F., 70 prove that the country between the
1aults is not north and south lode
and the counsel for the defendant said
| that they We're willing that the record
should show that the offer mas made.
Mr.. Robinson, what do you call a
horse?' asked Mr.. Cotter.
body of country rock between vein
walls answered the witness.
What do you say as to this country
between the faults being a horse?"
i should say it is not"
MI Cotter asked the witness to state
Wnen certain openings were closed. and
Mr.. Patterson objected. Mr.. Cotter
stated that the defendants witnesses
had testified that they could not get
into certain openings. and that the tes-
tlmony was to show the dates when the
openings became closed. The objection
was oVerruled and excepted to. The
witness then gave the evidence asked
for
Mr.. Cotter asked the witness to state
where the apex of the Johnstown vein
is, and Mr.. Patterson objected to the
question. on the grounds connected with
the other objections. The question arose
as to whether new matter was de-
veloped on the subject in the witness
previous testimony. and the court called
for the reading of the testimony.
The testimony was procured and read,
and the court overruled the objec-
ton.
The apex maps of both parties were
hun ND n
dence as to the vein and apex, which
are called the Johnstown discovery vein
and apex by the PLAINTIFFS witnesses,
and the Pennsylvania No. s vein and
apex by the defendants witnesses.
There is a vein exposed in a drift near
the surface. and the defendants wit
nesses said it was the apex of the vein
in question.
what do you say rs to that being
the apex of the Johnstown vein?" asked
Mr.. Cotter.
IT say positively that it is not the
apex said Mr.. Robinson.
Mr.. Robinson gave testimony con-
corning the vein as it appears in a
raise, contradicting the defendants
witnesses.
The witness said that all the slopes
in the ground on the Johnstown vein
Immediately west of the west fault are
omitted from the defendants model
and that the omission changes the as
pect of the ground entirely, as repre-
scented by the model.
Under an objection by Mr.. Patterson
overruled by the court Mr.. Robinson
testified that there is a body of por-
phyry between the faults on the $50
level not shown by the defendants
$50 level map, and that it was a con-
tinuation of porhyry bod,- east of and
outside the faults.
Are the veins all cut off at the
faults, as asserted by the defendants
Witnesses" asked Mr.. Cotter.
Mr.. Patterson objected to the ques-
ton. the objection was sustained. and
the witness was not permitted to an
swer the question. Then Mr.. Cotter
offered to prove, by all the rebuttal
witnesses, that the east and west veins
are not cut off. and the offer was in
cluded in the record.
Did you see the correlation map of
Mr. Braden. witness for the defense?'
asked Mr.. Cotter
Yes said the witness. ..
Can the east and west veins be cor
related as Mr.. Braden said they could
be correlated?" g: .y;',
Mr.. Patterson objected, upon the
usual grounds, and the court overruled
the objection, saying that itoconsidered