The Worcester spy. [volume] (Worcester, Mass.) 1898-1904, 1899-07-07
Half a Hundred En-
tered in Superior
Court.
DEVELOPMENT IN CARNEY CASE.
Catholic Priest Sued for AL
legged Defamation Of
Character.

Among the 80 cases entered in the
superior court, yesterday We're a large
number of considerable Importance.
The action of Pierre L. Couiliard, a
physician of Douglas, VS.. Rev. FIR. j.
Victor Campeau of Sutton is an action
Of tort to recover $4,000 for alleged de-
famatfon of character. The suit is the
z outcome of an alleged public condemna-
fion of the plaintiff at one of the serv-
ices in St. Annes church. The alleged
SANDER. it is claimed by the plaintiff,
was in the presence of a large congre-
cation, to the injury of practice as a
physician. ]. Fred Humes appears for
the plaintiff.
Another development in the Carney
case in Clinton appears in a suit
brought by James A. Duffy, admins
trator Of the estate of William Carney,
against James H. McGrath of Clinton
In an action of tort to recover $4,000.
The allegation is that the defendant or
his agents sold some noxious and pois-
onous compound to Carney instead of
whisky; that the said Carney drank
the substance and was rendered sick
and suffered many days of great agony.
Herbert Parker for the plaintiff.
Annie NJ Gardner, in two suits
against the New York Electric COM
pany seeks to recover $4,000 for the
death of her husband, John H. Gardner,
who was Killed in this city, it is alleged,
In the employ of the defendant, while
in the performance of his duties, by the
negligence of the defendant or his
agent. Hopkins, Smith & Hopkins for
plaintiff.
Agnes Gendron, administrative of. her
husband, Clement Gendron of Webster,
sues to recover $4,000 from H. N.
Skater. The allegation is that Clement
Gendron met his death while in the EN-
ploy of defendant from injuries receive
ed from freight car. Thayer &-Cobb
and John F. Jandron for the plaintiff.
Philip Spalter of Philadelphia VS..
George Bieberbach ct ais. of Worcester.
An action of contract to- recover for
goods sold the defendant and delivered
to the Worcester Brewing Co. The ad
damnum is $4,000. Henry F. Harris
for the plaintiff.
Nelson G. Jarvis VS.. Goes Wrench
Company, is an action of tort to recover
$1,000 for alleged personal injuries re-
ceived while operating machinery in the
ernploy of the defendants. Sheehan &
Cutting for the plaintiff.
George K. Adams VS.. inhabitants of
Northboro, an action of tort to recover
: $4,000 for allegkd personal injuries to a
son of the plaintiff The allegation is
that his horse took fright at a coil of
wire in the street, and ran, throwing
the boy from a wagon. w. M. Brig
ham for the plaintiff
Oscar F. Chase brings two suits for
$4,000 each, Ole against Jennie S. Chase
of Webster and the other against Fred
eric 7. Chase, to recover on the settle
nient of the estate of Frederick T.
Chase. Rice, King & Rice for plain
tiff
The case of Daniel H. Eames VS.. John
x. James ct al, administrator, with ad
damnum $4,000, has to do with the set
tlemeEt of the estate of Benjamin
James, and involves certain promissory
notes. Rice King & Rice for the plain
tiff
II. C. Cosgroye VS.. Metropolitan Life
Insurance Company, is an action Of
contract for $1,000 which it is alleged is
due on policy held. by plaintiff. E.,
]. Mcmahon appears for the plaintiff.
The town of Hudson is sued by Lewis
E. Fosgate to recover for a parcel of
land seized for the town water works
system. G.. F. Choate, Jr., for the
Plaintiff. ~.
James Dorr. proprietor of Holden
woolen mills, seeks to recover $4,000 in
an action of contract. The allegation
is that the amount is due by the Glen
Wcolen Mills Company on a note. Shee-
han & Cutting for the plaintiff.
Eldoz Robitor VS.. Arthur Fl. BrunelI.
an action of tort to recover $4,000 for in
juries received by being hit by gro
Gerry wagon belonging to the defendant.
D. F. OCennen and T. &C. -Carrigan for
the plaintiff. t
The Baker -Ricketson Company by
its COUNSEL w, B., Harding, brings an
snff 81. al Il
$4,000. against Charles A. Vaughan.