The Stark County Democrat. [volume] (Canton, Ohio) 1833-1912, 1899-11-07
WEEKLY BULLETIN.
Complete Record of the Business Done
in Common Pleas Court
Last Week.

A complete record of the business
transacted in the Stark county court of
| common pleas for last week will be
found below:
ROOM JUDGE MCCARTHY.
Monday, Oct. 91-Sexauer VS. Sexauer
ct al. Order of appraisement and sale
withdrawn by consent.
Fife Bros. Co. VS. Guyton. Trial to
court. Judgment for plaintiff and order
to sell attached property.
Novelty Iron company VS. Ohliger ct
al. Settled.
Douds VS. the J. B. Miller Co. Motion
sustained.
Dick VS. Martin. Motion overruled and
defendant excepts.
Dick VS. Martin. Motion overruled and
defendant eXcepts.
Murphy VS. Myers ct al. Leave to an
swer instanter.
Beeson VS. Beeson. Motion left off mo-
| ton docket
Bomberger VS. John A. Logan Council
| No. 6, o. U. A. NJ Motion to make more
definite and certain sustained. Leave
to amend petition by Nov. 10, 1899. Mo-
ton sustained as to costs; plaintiff to Sc
cure costs by Nov. 10,1S99.
Arnold VS. Hartranft ct al. Leave to
| answer by Nov. II, 1899 ,
Martin VS. Hartranft ct al. Leave to
| file motion instanter.
Duffy's assignee VS. city of Alliance.
Leave to answer by Nov. Is, 1899.
Mendlein VS. Grosss admr. Leave to
| file amended reply instanter.
Ridenour VS. Ridenour ct al. Leave to
Celia w. Ridenour and S. A. Conrad,
| guardian, to file answers instanter.
Partition ordered.
Kaylor ct al VS. Fox Lac Coal Co..
Leave to amend answer by interlining.
| Tuesday, October 31.-Richards VS.
| Stuart. Judgment for defendant.
Second Natl bank of Akron VS. Sha-
fer ct al. Settled
| Owens VS. Mishler Pottery Co. Sale
confirmed deed ordered and order Of
distribution.
| Central Savings Bank Co. VS. Vanbus-
kirk ct al. Sale confirmed, deed ordered
and order of distribution.
| Wednesday, Nov. 1-Shorbs admins
| traitor vs. Rider ct al. The Farmers
Bank has leave to file answer instanter.
Mendlein VS. Grosss admr. Trial to ju-
ry. Verdict for plaintiff for $4S6.
Thursday, Nov 2-Kurtz vs. Krider ct
al. Trial to court. Judgment for plain
tiff
Reemsnyder VS. Aetna Life ms. Co.
Dismissed by plaintiff and at his costs.
Friday, Nov 3-Kennedy & Co. VS..
Suttle.N Settled at costs of defendant
Tams VS. Thompson ct al. Judgment
against defendants for costs.
Ebel VS. Stoc etk ux. Leave to Henry
Stock to answer instanter
Frantz VS. Gulling, admr., etc. Trial
to court. Decree. Plaintiff gives no.
tice of appeal. Appeal bond 800.
Ernshaw VS. Clay ct al Leave to an
swer by Nov. II, 1893
ROOM 2-JJTDGE TAYLOR.
Wednesday, Nov. 1-Eichold e. Miller
VS. Lehman ct al. Trial to jury. Yer.
dict for plaintiff
Thursday. Nov. 2-Jones's assignee VI
Jones ct al. Trial to court. Decree
Brooks & Co. VS. Holwick. Leave t
answer extended to Nov. 6, 1899.
Farmers Bank VS. Barrick ct al. Leav,
! TO plaintiff to file reply to answer of Pol
, ly Barrick instanter.
Weaver VS. Walker Cook Co. Leave Il
file amended petition by Nov. 6, 1899.
Friday, Nov. 3--Zartman VS. Marchand
t Passed for service.
d Liable VS. Schario ct al. Trial TO jury
: verdict for defendants.
! Elbel VS. Stock ct ux. Leave to amenc
. petition instanter by interlineation.
Robson VS. Howell Mining Co. Leav
' to amend answer by Nov. 1S, 1899.
Feller VS. Johnson. Dismissed b!
, plaintiff without prejudice to new ac
tion and at his costs. Judgment for de
Q fendant for costs.