The times. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1890-1903, 1899-08-20

J In position 10 prove beyond doubt the
| authenticity az the report In question Tho
| auth of this report s I know, OF a very
! inferior position compared with his
! friends. Perhaps he cannot do otherwise
IMAM deny out Dee must know that this
document is not the only one Of his which
! We nave ln our ,hands 1 cannot onume.
rate .hem hut we have particularly let
Ter from his government written on Official
paper asking him to obtain official nfOr-
nation regarding vessel " the French
navy ana another letter in which he is ask
81 I'D request the French government ofii-
cliuy Tor three cavalry sabrCs 0f "a certain
pattern. These fahre5 were asked for
ana lnied through the intcmcI.t tiory of
tne bird Bureau.
-a.iy. w. have memorandum OK
lNe TOAST proposed by him at Che farewell
o.nncr to his c0mrldc and friend Ar.n'
a. (SchWarzkoppem. The aufbor or ,h.
T. Ioll now alleged To- 1o false referred
toast '-'
I'D order 20 recall 90 him the terms OF
nis toast and 10 show that our docu.
uieilts are authentic. I VIII recall only thu
4-sl pniase Attcr exchanging regrets
al lAe departure of a. ana telling him
me would have the best roc0llcctlons OF
nim' no added. and ] quote textually:
FOR a long time 90 come In an ths
armies or the world in America and
Asia. we VIII long De talked about. and
it VIII Doe said a. was quite unique"
Major Cugners statement was anna.
tently designed t0 prove the aouteness or
me Intelligence department. and 90 ellclt
vigorous denial
Major CIrrierc. the governments com.
missary said be thought lt doslrable 20
remark. as the representative of The gov.
ernmont that he must not Doe understood
TO endorse ail Major Cugnet had sald
with reference to foreign military
officer who no the present moment held a
diplomatic appointment I'm France"
lSensltI1m
Replying 90 NJ Demangc Major Cuig.
net insisted II Henry committed forgery
it was in the interest o. the country.
To this statement counsel retorted:
you did not say that 90 the Court of
Cessation"
Al the request OF M Demange tho Ma
iors deposition before tho Court of Cassa.
tion relating % Honrys motives and
Patty de- CLAIMS share in tho preparation
of tho forgery. was read 10 showed that
cUlgnot emphatcally declared before the
Court OF Cassation that De was con-
WINGED an investigation would easily
show that Patty Dc Clam was The prln.
c'psl author of the Henry forgery.
Witness claimed Dc thought he vas
doing his duty "in saying am thar Is IN
my mind"
"Do You adhere" asked counsel. 10
an you said before The full Court of Cas-.
slU0n?"
HOME THRUST
This question greatly confused the wit.
ness who attempted % explain by say.
ing Dc twas only arguing at fhat time"
aud that Il was not for him 20 Judge Patty
DO Clam.
When Dreyfus was asked n he wished
t0 reply % this witness he declared ha
had never asked Major Cuisnet for docu-
ments except by The desire of his chief.
Mai0r Bertin
"Al the details which Major Culgnee
has given on this subject said the
prisoner. "sprlng ont ~ bic own imagi-
nation and are due 90 the same state oc
mind which prompts unrc1soning bitter
ness even against am innocent man
Tho namo OF Major Du Patty de- Clam
CONTINUED on Second Page)