Evening journal. [volume] (Wilmington, Del.) 1888-1932, 1899-06-05
.FAHeY DEFEATS BUSH.
A Clean Sweep for the
Democratic Party.
OOgRAD WINS FROM HARMAN


AND NINE OF THE TWE14vEl
CITY COUNCITNEN- UNION RE
PUBIICANs POLL A SURPRISING
VOTE.
The city election on Saturday after
noon nesulted as follows:
The following Is the ticket elected'
For Mayor~-Dr. John g. Fahey. d.
For President OF Councll-wlrliam s.
Alexander. u.
For City william L. Ha-
mann, ID.
For city sohcItor-Henry c. Conrad
Rep.
For Assessor and Collector for North
ern Distrlct-rhomas $. Lewis. r. r.
For Assessor and Collector for South
crn District--Bugene NJ. sayers, ID.
For NIomber OF Council, First ward
George A. willis. d.
Second ward-,Mlchael l.. Cannon, ID.
Third ward-Thomas NJ. Monaghan. ID.
Fourth ward-James Kane. ID.
lgfth ward-William H. Plerson. II. II.
Sixth war-Georgc NJ Fisher, Il. r.
Seventh ward-Hamilton Stewart, II. r..
Eighth ward-Jonathan Groves, ID.
Ninth ward--Prince A. Mousley. d.
Tenth ward-John r. lIealy. ID.
Eleventh ward-Henry r. Smith, ID.
For Council the p9uralltieE and ma
jorlties were as follows
WIiis. 95; 5;Cannon. 14l;Mcnaghan, M;
Kane. 157; Piorson, %; FISHER IA; Stew
art $50: Groves, s; MOusley l05iliaaly,
sac: Smih. 157: Obenly. 90
After announcement OF the result the
Democrats headed by a brass band,
went cut to DR.. Fahey's, at Fourth
and Adams stredts, and sorenaded him.
THE mayor-eieCt made an address, IN
which he thanked his supporters for
htIr work, and promised ito purfoHm
THE duties OF his nIow office faithfully.
John S. Rossel was also present, and
made an Address.
THE ELECTIONS Lesson.
'Rdgu-ar Republicans played Dcsln,g
L same IN Wilmington This city u
tcas,5d Republican tendencies threw
aside an traditions and gave TO THE
i Democrats ontlre control OF tits internal
laffairs. A mayor president OF ClB
lCoIncii city treasurer, one assessor
land mine OF tine twelve members o.
lCNy Council are THE fruits of thlls stigma
v,ctcry. All THAT the RegaIlar Repub
> lllclns have w1lhwhioh to console them
leeives are three city cOunolamen ant
ain assessor. while dhey and the unloI
lRepublicams divide h0nors ON uhe c.t,
lsc1oltcr This is the result Of a dlv
lslcn OF a tCtal vote of 10,O25. IN
I Democratic districts the pluralltle
we've larger. In Republican districts th0
division OF The Republican votes gavl
the Democrats pluralitIes aud majorl
ties, small in many instances, hut an
suificiant for purposes of election o
lDemOcrauic officials
AS a test Of strength between th0
two Republican PARTIES the electiOI
demonstrated that the diegula
Republicans are dominant i'm the city
and I'm every ward but tine Eleventh
the vobe being as follows:
For mayNr-DemOcratic 1865 Reg
u,ar Republican, 3,47S; Union RepubA
cam. l,759; Prohibition, SO; Single Tax
35l
Fer pnesldent Of City Council
DamOoratic, 4547; Regular RepublI
cam 3,427; Union Republican. 1868
pcClhlbiticm. 73; Single Tax. 329.
For City Tfeasmrer-D -DemOcratic,
725; Regular Republican, 3,4l6; Unio
t. Republican, 1882; Prohibition. 81
: Single Tax, 800.
Fen assessor and colieotor of 10
Southern DISTRICT Democratic. 2.037
3 Regular Republican. 1,O14 Unfcn r.,
81 Ti..afi,t1Ittfr...
y tax, 9S
Y For assessor amid collector of Oh
Z lN Lahern Embellishments 1888.
T Regular Republican, 1880; Union RI
lpublian. 1,066; Prohibition, AZ; Sling
p Tax, 2O3.
~ In The several wands tho relatll'
y standing Of the panties is as foliOws;
" Fiust-Demlocratic, 263; Regular r.
~ pubr.can. 102; Union Republican, s.
" Prohibition, 4; Single Tax, 6.
Seconh,-DemocratIc, 432 Reguli
Ol Republican, 2O6; Union Republican. g
5 Prohibition. 2; Single Tax, %.
ThiId-DemOcratic. 40; Regular r.
4 publlcan, III; Union Republican, q
ss Prohibition, 3; Single Tax, II.
Fourthl-Democratic 405; ReguL
on Republican, 1853; Union Republican, q
~ Prohibition. / Single Tax. 19.
n DamiOcratic. $50; Regular r
- puhl.can, $40; Union Republican, l6
81 Prohibition. p; Single Tax. %.
Sixth Democratic, 275; ReguLar II
IN publican, 2S3 Union Republican, IA
es Prohibition, 2; Single Tax, 23
h1 Sayonth-Democralti 500; Reg'ul
y, Republican. S37; Union Republica
lIi 269; Prohibition, g; Single Tax, 50.
" Democratic, 431; Ragul
hS Republican, 423; Union Republioa
llS9 Prohibition, 10; Single Tax, AZ.
Nin.lh-Democratic, 1886; Regular n
I'd Dlpublican. 23l; Un1On Republican, 20
L. Prohibition, 6.
v Democratic, IA; Regular q
~ publican, 172; Union Republican,
" Prohibition. Z; Single Tax, 45.
- E.eventh-DemOcrati 22S; Ragul
r,d Republican. IS; Union Republican,
a lPrc.habitiOn, 1: Single Tax, z.
A Twelfbh-D Democratic. 236; Regu
Republican. 207; Union Republic;
126: Prolhihiuionl 3; Single Tax, 9.
An analysis cf the above fign
demonstrates several things conc
ng sively:
First and foremost, they SHOW ti
ay There are twice as many Regular /