The daily morning journal and courier., 1899-05-24

ing his paper he met Colonel Doherty
 there, Colonel Doherty having come into Heubleins, where witness, MT
 Betts, MT. Baldwin and MT. Moran were
 seated at table. Witness said that
 Colonel Doherty was engaged during the
 greater part of the time that he was in
 the party in discussing the social rela-
 tions of certain people in Waterbury, in
 which he appeared to be very much in-
 terested
 MT. Case-"Did you receive from any person connected with the Connecticut
 Indemnity company, or from any one
 else, any money to influence MT. Betts?"
 Not cent"
 MT. O'Neil then cross examined MT.
 Alloway and asked him where his bank
 book was. Witness said that his depos- it's were with a private firm that did not give bank books. He said that he had check books and stubs of checks, which he presumed were at his home in New York. The A. Houseman & Go, bank
 was the only banking house on which he drew checks. He had other accounts which represented the purchase and sale of securities. Witness refused to state the names of all brokers with whom he did business in New York.
 MT. O'Nei-"You refuse to answer, I presume because you fear to incrmi- nate yourself?"
 | You assume too much" Well, then, I insist that you answer | the question"
 Witness said that he did not care to disclose his business relations with | brokers, but had no objection to answer ing as to his bank business. Witness said that he would make a list of broll- CTS with whom he had dealt and list of his deposits and withdrawals with those brokers and give them to the com mittee. Witness said that he made de- posits at no regular times, but when ever he had occasion to. He would turn over to his counsel the checks and stubs representing his withdrawals of money last year, and his counsel might turn the checks and stubs over to the committee if he desired. Witness said that MT. Dennis did not give him S5O,00O or any part of $5oOOO. He was in the Manhattan hotel one evening last March, when Clark went through and saw witness, Mr. Dennis and Governor Bulkeley sitting at a table. Witness said that he had met MT. Dennis at the Manhattan hotel to talk over matters in connection with his New Haven busi- ness, and Governor Rulkeley happened to come in. Witness said that MT Dem his left him to go to New Haven that night
 MT. O'Neil-"Wherei is MT. Dennis?"
 T don't know, sir
 When did you see him last?"
 About a week ago."
 "Where?"
 No 30 Broad street New York;
 When did you and he sever your bus mess relations?"
 T should say that he left the Palla- dium to go to New York three or four months ago."
 What did he do then?'
 He went to work in the financial de- | partment of the New York Times"
 When he got through you had noth- ing to do with his dismissal?"
 No, sir
 What did he do then?"
 He went into business with a trust l company on Broadway"
 Do you know that certain large | sum of money went into his account | with that trust company"
 T do not"
 Witness knew of no telegram sent to Colonel Doherty by Charles l.. Baldwin and had no business relation with MT. 
 MT. O'Neil-"Colonel Doherty said that you knew more about the affairs of the Connecticut Indemnity company than he did"
 MT. Alloway-"I am quite ready to believe that, though I know nothing. He was secretary of the company"
 Witness said that on the occasion of his meeting MT. Betts, MT. Baldwin and Colonel Doherty in New Haven he stat ed to the insurance commissioner what Colonel Doherty had told him, to the ef- feet that the commissioner was unjustly against the Indemnity com pany and that he told Colonel Doherty then that he believed that the commis- sioner would give the Indemnity com oany a fair hearing. Nothing was said about compensation or furnishing Mr. Baldwin a place at the meeting in New Haven.
 At the time he saw Colonel Doherty in New York and the latter offered to give { l place to MT. Baldwin, witness stated hat no salary for MT. Baldwin was named.
 MT O'Sullivan asked MT. Aloway when he first heard of the alleged $5O,- 100 transaction
 Witness stated that it was about a year ago. MT. Keneay--"Mr. Alloway, where ( vas MT. Dennis last employed?" By a Trust company at No. 52 ; N. Y. I think he resigned hat place. on account of the illness of lis wife, a few weeks ago" ''Is he in Lewes, Del?" No sir; that statement has been ] made by these malevolent people be- { ause my father and mother reside ( here" { When you saw him did you say any, hing about his coming here?" ''No sir; he seemed very much per- urbed that these charges should have ( cen made against him." Witness said that the firm of A. iouseman x Co. had been specifically esignated by MT. Clark in the latters :. tatements to certain papers and for hat reason witness had brought the tatement from that firm. Witness tated that he was willing to give to the . a statement of the names of 7. ,,,;t |