The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1899-09-05

he never had any doubht OF Dreyfus' In
nsscenne- The two men then went at It
hammer and fongs. Pa.nleve facing Ggnse
with his arms folded and thrusslng bis
questions ANA reter,s until Gonse became
red In the face. Then Roget joined in the
discussion.
Court Greatly Anglers LahOri.
Labor began q crossexaminat.on OF
Gonse regarding certain documents in the
secret dossier to which Gonse had refer
ence, out which had not been submitted to
the court. Labor not receiving satisfac-
tory answers and finding that Jouause de-
ciined to allow him to press the matter
home In the way he wished, became ex-
srenely Indignant and protested with con-
siderable warmth against Jouausts veto
OF his questions. This caused a little
scene between Jouaust and Labor. Final
Iy the latter asked why a certain dispatch
from the French ambassador at Rome,
relative TO the payment Of money to Es-
terhszy by an Italian agent had not been
included In the secret dossier presented to
the court 6ionse replied that he had not
considered the dispatch OF sui1icient impcr-
lance 10 be included In the dossier Jou-
aust here again refused to allow some of
Iaboris questions. Labori was Tuning
with Indignation. but was obliged to SUBJ
matt.
Compiled the Secret Dossier.
Labori asked Gonse who compiled the
secret dossier.
Il did," shouted Commandant Cuignet,
from the body Of the hall
Eugnet then came TO the bar and declar-
ed he had omitted all documents frcm
abroad. because foreigners were inter-
esfed IN deceivsng us." Cuignet added that
! another dispatch existed, relating 10 a
conversation between foreign sovereign
and French military attache, In the
course OF which the sovereign sad:
What is now occurring in France Is q
proof OF the power Of the Jews"
This dispatch. said cuignes. although
against Dreyfus. was also omitted from
the secret dossier.
Demange and Labor Immediately arose
and expressed surprise that fresh evidence
against Dreyfus should be introduced
In this way. Labori also expressed curl
os!sy respecting these documents. which
were being he'd back concerning sspon-
eral stan. and he insisted that all docu-
msats should be submitted to the court
behind closed doors.
Duplictty OF the Caenerala.
A eommissary OF the secret police named
Temps was called by the defense He
proved Indirectly a strong witness for
nreyfus. His evidence brought out a g,ar-
ing instance OF duplicity on the part OF
STAFF officers In sapprcxsing documents.
Temps was called TO the general stan offSce
TO investigate espionage. and naturally had
consultations and close relations with Of
rcers OF the bureau. He began his tes-
simony by paying a high tribute to Pic
quarts correct attitude and uprigntness In
the Dreyfas inquiry. while other officers
sought 10 undermine him by insinuatsoas
Lieut.. Col. Henry, the witness asserted.
tried 10 induce him 10 attribute to Pic
quart the communication OF the hordereau
70 the Matin. In which journal, 1t viii be
remembered. the bardereau was first pub
nshed
Then ComuissaTy Temps came 10 the
mast important portion OF his testimony
Which led 10 restricting Of his revsa-
tons
HE witness was asked IL he had ever
investigated the Paulmira affair. Nhics,
was a. fellows. Fau,mire was the valet
Of Col. schwartzkcppen, ths German Mill
tary atsache at Paris. and 1, Was alleged
that he saw on Schwarfxkoppen's aesk
documents signed by Dreyfas The gen
eTal stan had declared that an EFFORT
would be made 10 get at the truth Of this
statement bat Paainire disappeared and
therefore. although the general staY could
not prove the story. i eauld no, tie dis
proved.
fro-Dreyfus Report Suppressed.
To tho question regarding thls case.
Camrlissary Temps replied that he had
faeorl. suggested that NJ Hem
nsor. s9behisf of the political poucs.
VINO - now IN Rennes experimenting the
precautions far the safety OF witnesses.
msy have been iutrnstsd WITH the inquiry
into the case.
Col 3oaaasI called 10 Hennlon. who was
present IL the courtroom. Come here aud
testify"