The Worcester spy. [volume] (Worcester, Mass.) 1898-1904, 1899-12-12
DECEMBER COURTS
OPEN FOR BUSINESS
The Superior Civil and Jury
Waived Terms Begin
Sessions

The superior civil court and the jury
waived session opened yesterday morn
ing at 10 o'clock. Owing to the absence
of Judge Lilley, Judge Stevens called
the docket in the civil court room. A
continuance was taken until Wednes-
day.
Prayer was offered by Rev. Austin
A. Carver. The business of the first
day was small.
The case heard was that of d. E.
Rounds & Co. VS.. August Calling. The
plaintiffs allege that the defendant
owes them the sum of $2O9.19, according
| to an account, which was offered in
evidence. The plaintiffs are wholesale
dealers in coffee and tea in Providence,
r, I. Blackmer & Vaughan appeared
for them. Marvin NJ. Taylor appeared
for the defendant. The case was heard
during the afternoon. Accounts were
infinitely gone into, and a long cross
examination held, The case took up
all the day.
OF the cases on the docket of the
jury-waived term of the court, these
have been continued: Ware National
bank VS.. z. A. Hubley ct ais. and tr.;
Lillian c. Bosworth vs. Thomas c. Plat
ct al; Toussaint Langerin VS.. Vitaline
Larose; Robert Hunter VS.. Theodore L.
Pomeroy and tr. Thomas L. Brown VS..
| Charles Case; Charles o. Bent vs.
Samuel Reed; Evehne Abel vs. Cyrus
i. Moore ct al; Lakeside Mfg. Co. vs..
city of Worcester; Emma ]. Brewer
VS.. Margaret Rebboli John NJ Woods
ct al. VS.. Baker Ricketson Co.; Har-
rison P. Murdoch ct al VS.. Clinton
Cooperative bank; William J.. Wizard
vs.. Nathan warren ct al; William I;
Forbes VS.. David L, Bradt; Howard
Bros. Mfg Co VS.. Automatic Machin-
| cry Co.; Albert H. Howard VS.. Auto
matte Machinery Co.; Lewis K. Speare
ct ali VS. Albert H. Chaffee; Thomas H.
Gray VIZ. Albert H. Chaffee; o. F. Raw
son ct ali VS.. Millbury Water Co.. the
Denholm & Mckay Co VS.. Millbury
i Water Co.; Charles F. Stevens vs. Ed
ward F. Barney; Baker Ricketson Co.
VS.. Charles Baker Co. ct al; the Star
Co. VS.. Edward, J. Kelley ct all; the
Granger Foundry & Machine Co vs.
Charles l.. Rawson; Philip Spaher VS..
George Bieberbach ct ais; Curtis P.
Gately vs.. WILDER w. Hobbs; Arthur
M. Taft VS.. Sarah j. Richards.
4 The case of Frank c. Winn VS.. Sam
u uel L. Merchant is in order for Wed
i nesday.
Edwin A. Sumner VS.. George b. Dins-
more ct AL, defaulted; Albert H
1 Waite, tr., VS.. Worcester Brewing Co.,
will be referred to a master: Charles
II " A1ett1lOP vs.. Clly VI NOICGSIcTt set
tied; Theodore r. Richardson VS.. VIM.
4 J. Coulter, demurrer; Milton T. Morse
: VS.. VIM. T. Carroll, settled; Gertrude
M. Janzer VS.. John Cowan, demurrer;
. Esther j. Parker VS.. Clarence E. Tup-
!, per, motion; Frank J. Briden VS.. Ed
ward e. Frost, will be referred to w
! B. Harding, auditor.
4 The case of Thomas J. Leonard VS..
Stephen A. Gilmore ct al. has been
placed on the jury list.
On the docket of the superior civil
court. these cases have been continued:
Maria E. Winn VS.. Anna M Seaver;
Permelia Barker VS.. A. B. Tenpey;
James Talcott VS.. James Early: Chas.
H. O'Malley VS.. Twenty-Five Associ-
ates; Simon Rawitzer ct al. VS.. Mary
A. McWilliams; Daniels, Cornell Com
pSny VS.. Jonathan E. Porter; Henry
w. King VS.. James F. Boyle; William
| Krafve VS.. Louis w. Rawson; Boston
and Albany Railroad Company VS.. city
of Worcester, passed; Emma ]. New
| ton vs. city of Worcester; John Nc
Lean VS.. Leominster and Clinton Street
| Railway Company passed; Edward
| Bates VS.. Worcester protective depart
ment; Henry w. King VS.. city Of Wor-
cester; Margaret O'Brien VS.. inhabit-
ants of city of Worcester; Leonard
| Harrington VS.. Lucy A. Rawson; Geo. |
|
John C. Yeaton VS.. Frank J. McGarrell |
ct al; Quinsigamond Lake Steamboat |
| Company VS.. Phenix Insurance Com
pany; Quinsigamond Lake Steamboat
| Company VS.. Phoenix Insurance Com
pany of Hartford; Lewis T. Kitchener |
VS.. Chester T. Linley; John j. Dolan |
| VS.. Thomas McGourty; jeremiah w !
Andrews VS.. American Guernsey Cattle |
| Club; Joseph N. Grenier VS.. Nicholas |
R. Power; George H. Johnson ct al VS. |
A. f. Richardson; M. ]. Whittall ct al |
| VS.. Wilkinson Crossley; Catherine Nc |
| Dermott VS.. town of Brookfield: Wa
| terloo Wagon Company Qimited) VS. |
New England Railroad Company ct |
al; Hannah Callahan VS.. Western I'm
| ion Telegraph Company; Michael Nc |
| Evoy VS.. Worcester and Suburban |
| Street Railway Company; James C. |
| Stewart VS.. city of Worcester; Samuel |
| Torgen VS.. Edward c. S. Tanner; Eliza |
Barnes VS.. commonwealth of Massa-
| chusetts ct AL: John Healy VS.. Lewis |
G, White; Charles A. Chase, exor., VS.. |
| Charles r. Robbins, passed; Alexan- |
der Elliot VS.. Peleg e. Francis; Emily |
| l.. Beaudry VS.. Worcester Consolidated |
| Street Railway Company; Charles L. |
Barnes ct al. VS.. James M. Coughlin; |
| Charles w. Crowley VS. Chapel Mills |
Manufacturing Company; Eliza Capen |
VS. Henry G. Skinner ct ais; Mary H. |
| Allen VS.. Worcester and Suburban |
Street Railway Company; Grace S. AL |
| len VS.. Worcester and Suburban Street |
Railway Company; Joseph OLeary VS.. |
city of Worcester; Charles A. Allen VS.. /
Worcester and Suburban Street Rail-
way Company; Hester N. Wetherell VS.. |
Fred A. Jones; Edgar M. Bond VS.. John
| O'Gara; Augustus Landquist VS.. Mary |
| E. Norcross' Michael McDermott VS.
Fitchburg Railroad Company; Am |
brose Richford VS.. John j. Germain; |
James F. Walsh VS.. Worcester and SUI |
burban Street Railway Company; Jo- |
hanna Walsh VS.. Worcester and Subur- |
ban Street Railway Company; John j. |
| White ct ais. VS.. Worcester and Subur- |
| ban Street Railway Company; Joseph |
Lie Claire VS.. town of Grafton; /
Edwin T. Chaplin VS.. Charles Wienstein |
ct AL; CORTLAND r. Eames VS.. George
Stott; Frank L. Mccartney VS.. city of |
| Worcester: Milton w. Smith VS. John