The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1899-12-14
nI.hed To Mr Kin.l.r on NJ. order In hIs offloa

| Mnbio tne Sotoners Inquest Was "a p,ogre@
murder OF Mrs. Adams. but before he had been
The samples T Sy rF't:pI from
direction as to Just the style which Was TO be
%nS re- the pen ths yas 70 n USED and the
ssres " vas S1S 10 If ealing etsnten to
various similariies and Mr.. Weeks. who had
been client most Of the morning, Jumped up
will not the Court do something to protect
| THIS defendant from the continual testifying Of
rom NJ N%SS sSfs ,hoSt.a osSoSp rSse''
the Recorder. and then b, directed him to ask
the So. to TshS notes Ss Mr. MAT oiSo5ps ito
defendant left out all hreaksH',
90 S99hiecti. shouted Mr.; Week Weeks. and the Re-
! except TO your llonor's ruling, said Mr.
Osborne Osborne. md then turning e MI Knsley, h9
There &C. almost SS Ca 's T n c ssETa
room, and Mr.. Weeks made a speech OF some
lCng,h denounclna the District Attorneys
with the examination and, then suddenly.
face sSoHns every Ne aydenGs fsff rs.s Son
he began to ,denoupce what Mr. Weeks had
say ssf II aad.p a S ssd Gu. tho
,SSo no, y0ur Honor, haven't done a thing
He continuod until tn, Recorder stopped
him. Then he claimed down anu turning to Mr..
kinsley he said. regardless OF the Recorders
The factis. Mr.. Kinsley, you found the breaks
II every one OF the specimens Of handwriting
that were submitted to YOU and in not one OF
Ten, At Your dictationf' Mr. KinslSy' said said |;
O. Do you know whether. the defendant
knew that YOU had oil the letters Of his at
WS.thsr he he knew new had all lie Knew ESe I had
some OF them.
NO BREAKS IN TIE COPIES. nut HEsIriNcIEs.
=, MIR knsey went on to say that In one or two
examined there had been breaks. there was
In this dictated matter written by holineux
evidence Of he,itsnsy Of the pc, S az the spot
CURED. He admitted that It was very slght
indeed and not enough Tor him to be alto:
datect It. This testimony set the jurors to sx-
aiming the Photographic closely, The nppar-
.ervs6is In on'y two spoi. In the res, Of tho
iTSS: O. i q. a In ,Ge hsTos;s, latter X:
wa, sory.e!y spscd Harpstsr, In the hsrpse
Tor Ir: Kin.ley 4 was spelled 'Ts,eEcd" In the
srsa favor and spprssla,sd" and IN a. be SS copy
written BY M2lineux the word ''con.iderel','
IF shs *. cGp s: w %s,
spelled from None OK the mistake. In SPELL
Ing that appeared IN the Original letter APP
asked whether mistakes appeared in the type.
written copy he had given TO Mo.ineuS to write
his SAMPLES from. and he said he didn't know.
MoLISKux's WIFE BROUGHT IN
The Harpster letters contain only thirty-fye
words. yet IL took more than three hours to
describe. COMPARE and analyze them. Sir.
IN the iermation Of letters and curves IA he did
sinuarities. hut he attached no weight to the
difference, while attaching great weight to
@r kIn.isy had JUS, completed hi. analyst,
whom Mr.. Osborne broke in with one o. his re-
ness furnished the sensation of the day IN this
osss Ss s 5;' ,ss es Sas Mr. S4o MS
that Moitaeu1's motive for the crime charged
they were married. This witness whose testi-
y u was GS 1. s' ,oa MHsT %an s' Sn
smooth face. a nicturssIue manner ot spS.kipg
Mr. 6.sorns Ia reply to questions ,ha, he wa, was
an employee OF the nrm Of Holt Co. In this
%. Did you know II. c. Barnett A. I did.
Mr.. Weeks objected here on the ground that
Barnets identity had not been proven. but the
Recorder said he would override objections of
He cl, std that Barnet had been mpioysd By
erposfsr Athletic cub 4. did:
g. Did you ever see him writer A Yes.
Wills h. w a. q did no correspond with
O. Did you see the letters written BY him to
,Mr, Osborne handed to Mr.. Holt 9 two.pass
replied. II think. Mr. Osborne. that that Is Tho
e' wh.ss : dtG yoa GET ses the s. Il wa,
taken out Of the fle OF Holt Co
&.la I'M yecnIB s SR.9a '"f, inT
OBJECTION TO REAL BARNET LETTER OVER
RULED.
this letter that Holt had testified was in the
IL eSSdua sar ssnes Bfsc
cause nobody had alleged that this rsTtle1a5
hsTnss had Ts ns1 Sne MT
Barnets in the city and that the II G. Barnet
body cor aected with tbs case, II the District
Attorney wants TO make th"s" letters relevant.
sent By Ibis Barnet Or rather that they we're
not sent BY any other Barnet"
Ts 5ss. had Ssp'ss .en uP nsy:
sestion with the cas-. seemed to strike every
Mr. Osborne replied that II Mr.. Weeks wanted
him to. he would PVT every Barnet IN the cry
AK 'aI few questions himself. and he asked Mr.
Holt what kind Of a looking man his Barnet
was;
mustache." said the witness. Then the
Recorder said that as it was his understanding
that the District Attorney wanted 70 have tho
hand writing Of this one Barnet put 10 evidence
~ the standard OF the hsspd%riting Of that
would admit the evidence ONLY 30 far as It re:
he had finished then and he, did not ask that
any comparls be made. Mr., Weeks asked
Holt where no lived. He replied 2Si Lexing-
ton avenue.
O. Were you living there in the month OF
Now, 1873. A. was
O. Did somo one from another city live there
In the month OF Nov. 1882 A. Yes. sir.
q. A lady2 A.. Yes, sir,
Mr. Holt had grown a little red In the face aud
he didn't answer this lat question for mo;
don't want you 10 be eXnct about how long"
Then ne said: About two days Ithnk,"'
=, Do YOU know Mr. Molineur' the defend-
q, Whore did you meet himH A. At the
club.
O. Through whom2 A. Through Barnet.
y. So far NJ you know were the relations be-
tween Mr. BatnNt and Molineux friendly A.
They seemed to be.
n 'novn Ia the Tina Of the death NJ Rarnat7