Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1899-09-07

President Harrison which caused the
President ~ The UuIted Sialee Z" rHI
the famous amnesty pry.lnnst.t.lnl =,
was generally supposed thht tl5.ti..i'.s
woodruff and the First fIe-ile.ys
prepared the famous appeal ioi lu.'i.
and amnesty. but tho ciaim get forth ny
tho Tribune editor upsetg ne sang.
Now Thai Inc tribune editor claims
Tor himself tha title Of church scilne 20
President woodruff M that ariloul.i
Instance. 10 will De- not hurpiHiNt W
learn later nn that the Tribune eu'p.
MAO prepared the later prophecies oi
rho tribune editor seems 10 have
teGn very nuNi0ua 10 serve The Chufch
leaders nt about the date ~ inc ahi'
uostv what has changed hls tlH',
tuda for the welfare Uf the lhuIch. N
,r,tsf nd H. FORGOTTEN that the Tribune
editor WINS 70 candidate Tor luiicl
gf1tea asuntor and that d. was dulnh
liI the good be- could Tor the Mormon
people ln tho hope that Doc W'lll Wln
The nruainfahip. but, uH ia now SHOWN
the feuat0rship went l1 gih'tr Hnl
Mormon people honest HH Doc then
said be- dld. now claims that ih'y hfe
moi honest and houpa un the Mormon
people Hu Che odluW possible.
That the Tnbunc editor Do eurehg1d
b well known. ln fact the editor in hls
own NNNHNN NNN|Ni' NNN|'' .NNH'' ''|N.A '''.
i1at the HcuhtorHhip Feeling sore over
bio defeat. be- purposes making lhe
Mormon leaders sunrr. Tor hu holds
tb.fu rrapHusibiD for his run-luuenr-
arrr In the United states Senate.
DO was believed Boy many Hint WHOM
fHe Tribune took W. The defense ~ we
Mormon people few years ago, u dll
=, ff1m u pure aud holy motive. but
i4trr actions show the Tdhune'a entire
course ia what Dr. commonly called
Hny aud "soft SOAP With one "nlrri
in View. and that 10 wherdlo the Mot-
mon people into clcctlng judge 81 g..
Goodwin to office. The cajnunH lnll.N
ard tho disappointed man turns o.
aulthomize those whom Dc Formerly
h IL is true that Editor Goodwin
wrote the amnesty petition Tor WIZ
f1rd woodruff. mudeHty aud common
dpcrucy would a. least demand tnat
since gocdwin never claimed al'n
honor while President Woodruff lived
b. should not have claimed lt afigr
President Woodruff had passed away
Again. about the time the nmucaN
nuufnl was sent 60 Washington, ihH
Tribune continuously claimed mat
President Woodruff was but tool POO
tho hands n dec. q. Cannon, and now
makes u appear that President WOOD
run was like plastic clay IN ne hhndH
IN the Tribune editor. When are We
H. believe the Tribune When u aald
Geo. " Cannon was supreme. % now
when the Tribune says that NJ tho
time referred TO. the Tribune g,hlnr
VIVA tho power behind President Wood
run7 our conviction IL the Tribune d
wrong In both Instances. The run
nrobnbIv h. that President Woodruff,
dealrlnr 10 have n united endorsement
in favor ~ amnesty caused the matter
h. be- fully discussed and after having
outlined the plan ~ the petition, per-
mltted Goodwin ~ write out the per-
f.rtrd arhemo and that Goodwin o. now
nasuminr 10 b. the originator NJ the nn-
neal hut really had nH little to do Win
ths anme az Hteuurraphrr Wnull
have who writes out the notes nitor re-
ceiving the dlctatlon.
Tho nerve or the Tribune, however
prerentn itself 10 view when % says
| ,bs resson ID nov makes ciaim o. hnv-
/ Ing written the appeal o. because "
/ wants 10 show the Mormon people that
h. the Tribune. must De- accepted by the
/ Normnn people ua authority In place
/ N tho prHefet News For pure ana
unndulterutcd gall this surely ~ un-
equnled. Let ~ suppose That ior 9 ,1,,g
| the Tribune tells the truth that Editor
| Goodwin wrote the appeal; that Prcsi.
/ don't Woodruff never saw or thought
/ of ID. or about the suhioct. until Il came
hot from Editor Go1dwln's pen that
/ woodruff wcpt over II without croasinH
| a "a" or dotting an g." What u thi
/ 'rrlbunoa enntonton7 Why n says we
| tho Tribune. wrote the appeal 90 th'
| prsaldont af the United States and W.
knew what We Intended u should mehi
| and our construction ~ u IL rlght ana
/ further. that the neHerot News had
/ nothing To do with the appeal and
| therefore. cannot tell what the amnoui,
/ appeal means. Il that fairf
| The Tribune editor claims that ~ dlt
/ NOT explain the document 10 Wiltord
/ Woodrufi. but that he cent u 10 tn
| CHURCH President, who signed ~ Wh'
/ now has u right 10 any what the appeh
l monna7 Tho man whu claims To have
] written ID for another. or the man wh'
] sIrned IL na hia own2 Who has righ
tn eay that Wuford Woodruff mean
| mat the amnesty appeal should meat
| aouething else other than q fall con
atructlon Of the English language woul'
make II any7
surely N Edltor Goodwin had IN
honor la exclusively prepare the peu
! lion aud failed 10 cay ln plain EnHliHl
what he wanted 20 any. can he nov
l claim that he and the Tribune nluu
have right 90 define tho meaning a
tho document and claim Tor u come
thing u doen not cay ln plain English
The standard would say that the beH
crct New has as much right 60 Sn
what the amnesty petition means u
mo 'rrihuna editor, who claims ho wrni
the petition for President Wiltor