Morning appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1877-1906, 1899-03-03


'' 7''"''"s i'I'' - '0s'I,'7 f"'',
''t'''' Lax
''> -''
~
" i
~, I.aI.;- - -. -.
.;,-, ,L., ~, .....: - 1 .
49,
..-Lt
,H;,.. L-5.,l ., 49,. ,ay
Er,t.o ,.s.,... ......t.. T., ;..r.o .,.r
s..- ..i =.
,..j.. ,.. ,-.... ..-.., -
-.,.. ..it..a .-... ...,. t.,..
.., ...... ..... ...-..
-i... ,.... ...-. .I.....f .... .-r.... I....-I
...,.. .r.... ...... ~,...,,.|
.... .,... -.,..-!
.. 50. ....,- .. t,. ...-
$3.50. ...... ,-.
..... 90 -.....t BE. ......I ....
f,. ..... .... ..... 4..
f.. ... .... .. ...... ..M..... 81 t.
-..... ........ ...l..-...
iu..-. ..,..I.-. .t..uIs.. .~ u.tv u..
..1.....I.,uu. .-.....nrr.. Ga...r
of ..-. t.u..ir-.....r ..r I. .Iirv f.-
der thrd ..r,.. I1,r. extensive and direct
than il .::e-C parties had net hr.t. .n~-
missed from the art,nu. These "a ..cs
I defendant were moi ouIy committing and
/ threatening tn continue tn commit tine
act coupIajupd of under the umdispuled
| showing bvtha record in the case. but
had been hrouoht into c,nrt and had sub
mitted themselves TO its iurisdiction.
They were p~roD4rlv made parties and
vera necessary n.rties under the respon-
dents comulaint and under he aver
nents of the answers and the evidence
co~ur1usivaly shows that . fnlI and COM
nIoto determination, of the controversy
bet ween the rasnonden+ and the an
neIlants could not he made without
their presence. Htseems to us under this
showiup that they were Indispensable
parties and that the action of the court
was fatal error and preiudicial to the
rights of the apnellants, This couclu.
sion seems esnecia1lv strong when it is
sboo, Inv tho ro.o,.1 +ha+ tho co,rt oou1C
h.ve four5 ,bat tba diversion Of tn,
w.ter NV tho defendants to whom tn,
.ct;on o. dismissed uas mada at tn.
tima co,,nI.;pad of AGAINST the r;pht,
NOT only of the r~esnondent but ais,
AGAINST the RIGHTS of the appellants an,
+bat tho dams apa tho obstr,ctions an,
tberabv tho divarsions of tho watar h,
these defendant alone were AGAINST an,
riobt ar claim of tba~r osnondant
Asahova stated tho court treated I'll
ootion in ito fndinos conoInsioD aud dc
cis;on as one brougbt simnlv To ahata an,
= enioin a nuisance hut on the hearing q
Questions of fact ,nada nv the rIaadino
tho action WAC trsated Inv court An
counsel AS one in which ther rights OF tn
narties to the use of specitic ouant
tics Of tho u.tar of tbar iyer for hepif
c;,l ur,oseSxere 10 no dstarminaG Thar
aisn,a t,o+a shaun INV IN
orid.,. vh;.h h.vo diract bn,r; -
uno, daci.ior IF tho questions To /
~ ,,l- -, o
arro vbi.h v,o ,loon, # ro.a.sa,y
sot ,rt in Ibis MART of tho on,rioD
If * shown that = large number ,
dams and .ions othar than tho,
. ct tive .r,.l,.u, .n1 ,bair a,-doGon,
amt. Ionnia & ,rl ,arruan I Dnrnh
i . l. C.utri1a. rara naiut.ipaI NV II
,,hor n,rt;os .L,,
:. tho ro.,,,1.r,,. l.nd IN tho ,i,.or )
-, means which h vators Of tba r;,
, ,,a,a ba1I ha,L, AMI di,or,ad 5nri,r II
tim. If h an.o.d inya,inn of tho ,
~ snnulort,s ,irb,s and thara is an ah>
lu1e absence of any showing on the m
of the defendants 9th. than these ann,
AZ ants and their c~o-defendants Jennie
~ and Carmen Il. Dunphy that such dan
!, and distractions and thereby such {
vnrsions of tho water wera maintain
or made under any claim of right there
On bv ~annronriation or otherwise.
The lands of the r~esnondent are 81,
# ated on the Humboldt River al,c
NJ twelve miles above or e~asterlv from w
The lands of the appells
es Gravson are bipher IN on the river at
Id near Reowawe. The lands of the ann
lilo liant Anderson are on the river betwe
ga the lands of Grs,son and the resp,