The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1899-02-10

TS raa- vas "eore ~ r-sess d. gave
- az % rad te woman Ever = TIA.
eass 80 might ret hsvs been s'Ao-e 90.
10 Thfr9 sarfy ha5 .=serter@. art.,r
A.lS examined the witness . sore
as-gln aaSng thLs line TIE ars.ercs vax
interested. bot Mr. Rc-ss.. a. eyr-r-ss, re-
Van AExtsne vzs re.
cart know waa. the court .hs-..
A@oGs j. be sas1 III. I otsAs-- "a .hI.
LIE o. cross-exanai1atlon- / con, ear.
:. SoA& !, Particularly. but GS-'s gee that
H.asseS@l ard = Is taxing Up slrre"
Attorney DoTe. with a x.sa. sror =,
roiitsress. SAID he would s@ays .he cn..-
court "-A Aa7
Judge Moor. regarded he ceiling attain
aSely. ! can't ses," sad Re. that there
- Any particular ground Ter ne OBJECTION
us' coat care 10 hear Ire witness oosn-
100 about Any legal prnPos.sbor. or at,oe.t
any question as &c xaesher . MAJ was
core up o. net" Attorney rsore sz~~zs.t-
e24Ey remarked taat Il was 3 rra.es~ -
eItFsuss Indifference - HIM. ara that s.
The court 6idn't like inc GENERALIZATION
re wo1ia cult. Attorney Ronald xp.aia-
ed sis objection further. and Mr. Ogre re-
Piled.
i said the objection vas ywp--,,yss ;,
remarked The court. Go ahead xtth ths
cfe@<-sxzmsnattoz."
on, 20, yogr homer" rs~aanIss Mr
Iofs, j really dont care - continue the
denomination.
Vel the other SIDE can have the wit
fesS," said Judge Moore Attorney wiz
scr conducted me redirect sxau.insrtor.
but aeve.ogsd hlcls Of Interest
n V Ben, Efe insurance agent and
me next witness. testified that he spN-.
ais vacation last summer al East sound
Attorney N.nxtock was g glesr at the
same hotel. Witness heard wanstock say
- ksfr-ss ahs-zr
Zee from kaondiker. wInstocs said
nothing about wine supper IN connection
WITH TIE matter. Wlnsscck dis net make
'as visit to Seattle. sending MS wife ln-
stead She remarked II presence Of the
witness tAaf her trip vas successful.
Beas testimony was evidently a clsap-
Isoiat.nent 70 Attorneys wiEsor ard Ron
aid They had proved nothing by the
witness, and Attorney Dore refused 70
cfasS-rxEU.ne.
J e Doney. formerly clerk Of the rau-
FseipaI court, vas 10 have testified as To
fines alleged tc have been paid 81 Mrs.
Van Als1ias. but, no; having refreshed his
memory from the court records, was ex-
cused
Wtestoek's Former st-nograp Ter.
Aereau Ashley, the steaosrapher. was
The next and last witness. His testimony
On direct exArnina ton vas tn the main A
Repetition ef the allegations Of The seEsa-
sional affidavit he filed IN the order 20
show cause proceedings several weeks ago
lie said that Winstock had boastea TO him
how ne was 20 get $3.50 from Mrs. Van
A.stine sor assisting in bringing about her
marriage with the klcnaker. Witness
had often esea Mrs. Van AlStine in VIA
stocks office before her marriage. lie
met her there first In tAe fail % ,sss.
WInstock transacted her ordinary bust
ness for her. wiasioek, the witness said.
had fully Outlined 20 him the scheme
whereby the Kicndike bridegroom was 20
be neecea. Mrs. Van Alsiiue was rot
70 ask her new husband for anything. not
even . present, untn she has fully gained
his confidence. then she was % scoop his
whole pile WIns,ock offer spoke about
hls fee from the case. saying that Mrs.
Van AStine was a little SLOW. bat would
surely pay.
Ths witness testimony was Ia line with
his AFFIDAVIT: already published
The cToss-exausiuAt!on OF Ashley was
very amusing. The witness tod al about
the wedding in Attorney wina;ock's office
%. January :, iSs.
'-yhat WAS said there that evening in
presence of the defendant" asked Attor-
ney Dare.
Well replied me witness. Y guess I
can't repea. the marriage ceremony, bnt
Tat Is about ail there was
Attorney Dore urged tha witness to ten
more alout the wedding. The witness
said II was not different from & DOZEN
other justice court weidnFs 10 which BE-
had beer a witness. Van Alstine aad the
bride nodded their heads wSSa the fust.~s
repeated the marriage service. They may
have "Erun;cd nttlet Witness didn't
hear either 81 theHa say anything ateIilsi-
he IN response 10 the justice qaeft}ors
There was 10 unHsaa. feature. not even
any wiae.
Witness said ne had } conversation With
Wlnxtock In the cutter room - the office
iux. asfsr the ceremony. WIastock gave
witness q g. god piece f7r his services IN
procuring a license. and seemed .n high
spirits, Wi1stock remarked thai ha would
make &.ea ~ t1e atght's w3fk ard fola
tie witness a joke Aaw Re ha1 solem7ly
sworn % the bridegroom he WAS getting
: nice woman" far 4 wife.
Archie Noye.' visits.
Witness admitted several things which
seemed 10 satisfy Attorney Dere extreme
II well. one WAS that Archie Moves had
visited Attorney wingtock o. business q
his oan. not cuanectea wilh Mrs Van A.
silue Another wAs that TIE witness as
mitted that he was unable 80 swear Una;
Mrs Van Alst!ue hal hesg Il Wiusto,k+s
office for tive months pT!a< 10 the dzv of
her wedding. Or that day she was tn
Two ST taroe times, witness thought. This
was IN direct contradiction o. the state
faSGL mace ~ Attorney &}ekls%sAi% ca tAF
witness stand. and against the contention
q rae defense that the marriage scheme
vas cercoCf ed is Attorney WIastcck's e.
fce after Mv. Van Aistine's arrival from
Alaska OF January : 1891.
Attorney p8rs attacked IRE Honesty OF
tAe witness by asking HIN What he has
received fer making hls ata4ay3t against
wlnstack Witness denied having t-eer
rasa = cent. excsci SO ~ witness fees.
lis aenira that rs had ever Ead suore teas
o1z conversation VIVA Eaa A3ssjne fl r.
Sard te gong - Alaska lie had never
asked aid teom Van Alstsae oc any ether
man Witness 1l3 acf deny taat ae VS.
RET "a frfe9a of WINS oeks- eut denied
ssas 10 as3 made 80 sfatas.s n 4 spirit
- revenge Tie made the as@aats; a. 81
attempt 20 couussTkaiaDce shn erect os an
afa4av.t Ns had rraa% IN the same case
or Attorney " gs'cck. which Vltaees Ha.t
ct& uot contain the wa@ie trg.h Wt0ess
-&a ~ea.g r~et EyfwSturA raj asked gsfs~.sazz