Wheeling register. [volume] (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1878-1935, 1899-09-05
|RE CIRCUIT court,
Bptemher Term Opened Yesterday
Morning.

Mul uluSs
DOCKET CALLED IN BOTH
N RTs. AND CASES SET OR
HERWISE DISPOSED OF--THE
INION OF JUDGE PAUL IN
e PAIGE, CAREY & co. CASE.
b parts of the Circuit Court,
S Hervey and PAUL presiding,
#bled yesterday morning, and a
amount of preliminary business
g Transacted during the day, includ-
calling of the dockets.
ling the morning Judge PAUL rem
a decision in the case of City VS..
Carey & Co., growing out of the
|uction of the Main street stone
which has been pending for
The opinion is on the report OF
issioner George r. e. Gilchrist. to
the city excepted because a
claimed of $S93.50 was not allow
d also because Of interest charges
,S41.59. These exceptions were
" led, as was also the exception of
Steenrood. AS to the exceptions
BY the Goshorn estate as to dam
property at the south end of the
the court held that no damage
ed and that the property is as val
as ever. AS to the orders given
W defendant in favor of various par
this city, the court holds that the
was at that time insolvent. and
Huch orders were in the nature OF
ences, and are void. Several
exceptions to the report were con-
and as a rule are oyerruled. al
Nh a small claim of Gilmore
e and the Wheeling Intelligencer
stained, as is the commissioners
Of S2,556.75 for dispositions and
gport. The report is necessarily
luminous document, and the COM
|ner was complimented by the
as to its preparation.
" THE DOCKET CALLED.
cases pending on the docket
disposed of on call as follows:
e. Hutchinson VS.. w. H. Chap
dismissed; Bank of Wheeling VS..
II ct al, set for trial September
Christina Zilles VS.. Barbara Zilles,
Bsed; Minnie w. Zilles VS.. Bar
Zilles, dismissed; Christopher
Niles Administrative VS.. Wheel
Electrical company, transferred to
wo; Ross ]. Winning VS.. Howard
IDson, dismissed; B. II. Prichard's
vs.. T. T. Hutchisson ct al, dis
II; B. F. Prichard's admr. VS.. T.
IutchissoG, dismissed; City of
ling VS.. ]. A. Holiday & Son, set
\ ptember IS; S. M. Rice & Co. VS..
Hutchinson, passed to September
M. Rice & Co., VS.. T. T. Hutch
4 let al, same proceeding; William
llaffln VS.. The c. e. Adams Co.,
'Esed at the cost of the plaintiff;
Ia Auber VS.. o. H. Auber, set
+ ptember 9; John A. Mathews VS..
j. Healy, dismissed; M. L. Davis
m Grove Coal Co., transferred to
|-wo, demurrer set for September
Fhee*ng Bridge C Terminal Co.
bard of Public Works ct al, dis
/ at the cost of plaintiff; Clarence
IN VS.. Clinton Rhodes & Co., set
|nber 10; w. J. Colts US. City Of
ling, hearing Saturday; Anna Nc
ew's guardian VS.. Klondike Loan
motion to dismiss, set Saturday;
Ike & Co. VS.. P. Bachman's Sons,
i plea on Friday; G. P. Browns
Itrix VS.. T. G. Thompson ct al,
fued; Eva Hanko VS.. Wheeling
lay Co., set trial September rs;
Iorris VS.. Joseph Kolinsky ct a.,
mber 20, trial; R. B. Wyatt, ct al,
. Hefenbine, set for trial Septem-
;; Harry Johnson VS.. Os0orn,Gray,
rTer, set Saturday; Catherine Nc
ley VS.. Mary E. Prayer ct al, set
Fial September 20; R. II. Aber-
pie VS.. e. P. Wheat, set for trial
mber 20; James Underwood VS.. P.
st. L. railway company, trial Sep
er 81; ]. w. Norman, VS.. ]. S. Coff-
ct al, dismissed, motion for new
John P. Hunter VS.. ]. w. Hunter,
transferred to part two:
Xxi Manufacturing Co. VS.. receivers,
O., set trial September 16; Ada
Tart vs.. Frank McFadden, Septem-
l on trial; Samuel K. Hissom VS..
S R. Hissom, demurrer to each
! September 16; Walter J. Hall vs..
r. r. Co., passed till Saturday;
beth Lindeman, ETC., VS.. Joseph
nauer, demurrer to each count,
mber IS; United States Glass Co.
w. Hunter Co., transferred TO part
L. D. Craft VS.. w. B. 0abert,
rrer; Ella Murtagh VS.. Wheeling
way Co., demurrer to each count,
al Glass Works VS.. J. E. Clator
, demurrer to each count, Septem-
!; J. w. Campbell's administrator