The Hawaiian gazette. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1865-1918, 1899-08-01

Ia liou- McClanahsn FOR piaintiffs Rob
ertson Wilder for defendants
\ " Morsman vs. G. MontinE. a..
sumpslt Castlc-weayer for plalntiu
Humphreys Cor defendant.
Hanakaulani Holt W. Hamakua Mil
Co. eiectment Dickey for plaintifi
c. Brown for defendant
G. X laukea VI. v. Cartwright vt al
quieting title. Dickey for pla,ntiff
Kinney -Ballou- McC lanahan Tor defend
ants.
kalau VS. Eva Plantation co. ct al:
trespass kinney Ballou~ Nc e lanahan
for plaintln: G. Brown for defendants.
s. Ahml VS.. Annie Waller ct al
quieting title kaneakua- Achi John
son -I<aulukou for plaintiff; kinney
Ballou-McClanahan Robertson Will
der Magoon-Silliman Brown for de-
PENDANTS.
X. Lazarus VS.. ]. o. Carter: replevin.
Appeal from District Court of Honolu-
In. Davis for plaintiff; kinney-Bal-
lou-McClanahan for defendant-appel
liant.
Priscilla r. Hassinger ct al VS.. Helen
II. King ct al; ejectment Robertson
Wilder Thurston- Carter for plaintiffs:
Kinney Ballou-McC lanahan for defend
iants.
| A. n. A. Odds VS.. J. A. Magoon: tres
pass. Humphreys Hankey-G Cesar -l2en-
shall for plaintiff; Magoon-Sillinsan for
defendant.
Soloman Kauai VS.. J. X. Sumner ct
al; malicious prosecution. Magoon-
lSilliman for plaintiff; Thurston-Carte
Andrews-H umphreys Hankey Gear :
Stewart for defendants.
Luika Kilinahe VS.. II. r. Macfarlane
ct al: executors ejectment. Dickey for
plaintiff: Kinney-Ballou-Aic Cianahan
for defendants.
Mary X Tibbetts VS.. S. M. Damon ct
al. trustees: ejectment. Magoon-Silli-
man for plaintiff Kinney-Ballon-aIc-
Clanahan for defendants.
Mele Uli ct al VS.. Haw. Com. q s.
ICo.; ejectment. Correa for plaintiffs:
Hartwell- Castle-Weaver for defendant.
Benito Guerrero VS.. Anna dos A. Per
Try: ejectment. Kinney-Balion-Ai Ian
ahan for plaintiff; Robertson-Wiider
for defendant.
Kan Wing Chew VS.. A. NJ. Brown and
&c. r. Chillingworth: trespass Clark
kaneakua for plaintiff; Dole for de
PENDANTS.
| Nulstdu noptfl, uubtS', w. Sootb-
mon Kauai ct al; ejectment. McCaDts
IStewart for plaintiff; Magoon-Silliman
for defendants.
: Junius Kaae VS.. o. r.. q; L. Co; re-
plevin. NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. for plain
tiff; Hatch for defendant
Jessie kaae VS.. o. r.. & L. Co; re-
/. plevin. Humphreys-Hankey for plain
ltiff: Hatch for defendant.
Kahai (w) ct al VS.. J.. AhlO-et al;
quieting title. Poepoe for plaintiffs
r c. Brown for defendants.
T. II. Mossman VS.. S. Nj. Damon .et,al
; trustees; quieting title. 'Castle-Meay-
: er-Achi-JohnsOn for plaintiff.
Eleanor X. Prendergast vs.. Peter
Martin; ejectment Magoon-Silliman
Z for plaintiff; Kinney-Ballou-Mccla na-
: han for defendant.
/ FOREIGN JURY--cIVJL
. Tuck Chew vs. Makee Sugar Co; as.
sumpsit. Roberts0n-Wilder
: for plaintiff; OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES
han for defendant.
J. o. Carter VS.. Samuel Morris; as
sumpsit. Kinney-Ballou-AicC lanalaI
for plaintiff: Hatch for defendant
= c. Bachelor VS.. G. b. Wilson, mar
y shall; trespass. Creighton for plain
tiff; Humphreys-Gear for defendant.
NJ. G. Silva VS.. c. s. Desky; damages
y Creighton for plaintiff; Kinney-BaliOu
McGlanahan for defendant
/; j. A. Magoon VS.. l.. Marks; assump
j sit. Appeal from District Court Of do
nolulu. Magoon-Silliman for pfaintfr
; Davis for ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.
: A. M. Brown VS.. Chung c. h. Chcng
u covenant. Davis for plaintiff.
T. w. Hebron VS.. Charles J. Helm
l. assumpsit. Robertson Wilder fol
n plaintiff; Neumann-Dayis Cor defend
ant
f; Charles j. Helm VS.. r. D. McStock
y er ct al: trespass. Neumann-Davis 10
u plaintiff; Dole-Robertson-Wilcer f0
defendants.
: j. j. Byrne VS.. y. J. Noeller; assamp
: sit. Kinney-Ball ou-McClazehaD 10
Il PLAINTIFF Magoon-Silliman for Gefend
!. ant.
Lum Sung ct al VS.. Marion ~. Lun
e ing; action on contract Maeoon-Silli
D. man for plaintiffs; Humphreys7Hanlse.
= for defendant.
Kahului X n. Co. VS.. HaT. Com. 4
l. S. Co.; trespass. Kinney-B aliou-Me
n Clanahan for plaintiff: HaTtWell<as
o e-Weaver for defendant.
A. r. Titlow VS.. Albert Why.s ct ~
!; assumpsit. Cartheart-Parke for plain
Il tin; Hankey for defendant
D. Eva Power vs.. w. ii. Bradley 81 Al
assumpsit. Dickey for plaintiff Hula
|; phreys-Hankey for defendants.
II Lee Kyau (w) VS.. 10 Kui %; alan
4. der. McCants Stewart for plaintiff
Davidson for defendant.
III J. f. Haglund VS.. n. y. Jacobsen; AZ
; sumpsit. Davis for plaintiff c. Prov
: for defendant.
II. n, Hitchcock VS.. The Haw. Tram
a ways Co., Ltd; damages. Davis 70
J. plaintiff; Neumann-De Bolt fOr defend
I, ant.
Schweitzer & Co. VS.. Charles J. VI
}. shell; assumpsit. NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS.
Al for plaintiff; Magoon-Silliman for DC
{, PENDANT.
Charles u. Bartlett W. Haw. Ca
Mfg Co Smith for plaintin KINNEY