Morning appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1877-1906, 1899-03-03

''N "7'' W. '''
unnecessary to pass upon tins question:.
! he "foer denying appellants motion
i'r " ne" 'rlal VIII ne reversed ana IN"
AUST I''l''hdeu Tor iuriher proceedings
/" "''"F""hce herewith.
concur: HELkNA'. y
boNNIFIELD. ca.
Dissenting.
The appellants ;nuaai from ., ..,l.r
denying their motion lorurw. f~...afunr.
y new trial i a re-eNuotr"U.aa ur ur is
sue Of fac in the sant" r.,. 3..r rial
an" de'l~'"h ~ "l'fy, r'.".t .G D. cree.
+'''i' N''''N' SET '-I"j
men 'l' '~pl"i'1uI't '. ."" t"j0' is
Hltt' .tt''i '5' &f''t'. .. r.. a.."f"r-
I'I''} oil ii' ">Il'i''' 1.. t". N.r-
.'''- or '' ''f '','.~i"I. or '.. ii .r"t inst
-jt,. n' "'I"fIH .'W """"r".. .l. jrtl
''.'' - .''.' .' +'. '' '''# ISL. .lo
"l|' '.' "..' .". .it ... .t.9
|.".' ". .'.'I''- |'..'' '~ |'." veg
~. $4,000 .''' ''. ..' i.-''"'' NJ.
..''"' >.''~. N''''. "-'> VA.
-\li""i'a-r ih"t:"h TOR """ trial Na7
.''' "PLN '1' "'.''" GF.'"'..t' SAT-
>''''''' '''' '~ "l'e''"''' >l'}''"~ 1875 p.
~ ''''.' ~tti>' @1c' "-I"' "ilAr SnHfI|lhg
''S '''.'' VI Ii'P'Ilh@ '"' >l;l'ln'Ht ana
''N '''i'ii''c''lo proFldeS' 'litl' ""h the
"' VI " hi"ti"i Iei't'lic' may
We iIl"'e 10 the PieadingS, dispositions
'''' '''"iieh'al eFlderc" on lille, teSt1-
"''''S ''Nc" All written out by a short
i"ii' IePoI'er authorized 10y the court to
'"N1 II s"iie' anu the minutes OF the
NVtiII.
0t"'eiiiehI 'l'!S uSed III connection
'ii ~ piV"oi's"' "epoSl'iohS' docu-
"Ni 'Nr'ohce OH NE, testimony
TAKEN ny d reporter, and minutes of the
cS"rt as are read or referred to on the
meaning "l the ihotlon III court below
small roi''i'u'e "lIhout lufther state
~ P'p0iS 70 soe uSeo on appeal
iioii 'i!e "roer granting or refusing the
new ''lal,
III '"iu Statement III connection with
'he Pleadlhgs' deposltlons, etc, as are
feao or referred to on said hearing, con-
st1tute the statement on appeal" (Cald-
well VS.. Greedy, 5 New. 262; White VS..
: mite b NeV.2i.
1t will be observed that it is not the
pleadings, dispositions, etc, simply
on file i'll the case, but such plead
lngs, dispositions. etc, as are read or re-
t ferred to on said hearing of the motion
= In the trial court, in connection with
eald statement that constitute the state
, lnent on appeal.
/ "Ihe statute has plainly and ex-
I pressly declared what an appellant shall
e FURNISH inns court TO entltle him to q
y hearli'g; such matter must be before the
e court.
: va. Imperial Nj. 20. VS.. Barstow D Nev.252)
IL Is necessary 'nat the issue OF tact tor
"hl'h ne" 'rial Is asked he presented
II 10 III" app'iiate court either by the state
Y m"nt by which the application for new
z trial Is made or by reading or referring to
/ the pleadings on the hearing of the mo-
lloh. Ii by the latter mode, 1t must be
shown that the lleadings were so read or
referred to. II thy were neither read
nor re''if"d 10, they dId not become a
part OF me record ON the motion IN the
IS court below.
y an appeal from an order granting
OF refusing u now iri'l the appellate
r'uil IL '""uo'd IN It's investigation t
the frr"f" tt on SUI motion in the
O. court II Ir"."
- caldwell rs Greedy, > New, 1922
1T In" pi"ddHnGS IN this case are not en-
~ p'dl'd III ihe St"telhett' nor are the Is
as sues OF Tact otherwise shown, or tn
P'''ul''GN shown |" nave b02n read or re
y 'cFI'" !" on me hearing OF the motor
It. Latter showing might have bee
10 lii3u" by the certificate OF the Judge t
HS That ebert.
en- Sampson vs.. Ogg, IS New. 2S.)
P "A copy OF til" statement shall he AT
a neXed to Il cOpy of the Judgment Roll, i
IN the appeal be from the judgment; if til
It's appeal I've from an order To a copy {
s"ch order"
lef Gen. Stats. Sec. 33oS.
ice copy OF the Judgment roll is not
he be annexed t." a ropy OF the statemer
unless the appeal he taken IRON tn