The news & observer. [volume] (Raleigh, N.C.) 1894-current, 1899-10-13
WAKE SUPERIOR COURT.
Calendar for the October Term for tn,
Trial of Civil Causes.

'aitHddT lof the Otlobff Term Tor the
Trial of Civil Causes.
The calendar set for the October term
of Wake Superior court, which meets
here on October %. Judge Moore pre-
siding, is as follows: Cases will take
precedence from day to day till dispos-
ed of. Suitors and witnesses need not
attend until the day ON which their
cases are set:
FIRST WEEK.
Monday, October %. State ex rel.
Wilkes, etc. vs. Fl. +. Jones, Sheriff at
ais; DR.. II. III. Marshburn VS.. CASTOR
+. Powell VIM. j. Edwards VS.. Sea
board and Roanoke Railroad Company
ct ais; w. Il. Brewer VS.. The Universe.
ty of North Carolina; Robert Johns vs..
Il. w. Upchurch; X. A. Freeman vs.. J.
n. Holding. The Raleigh Paper Co;
George III. Glass VS.. Mary w. Glass; G.
C. Covington and Company vs. j G..
Ball: Bart NJ. Gatling vs.. The City of
Raleigh; Louisa IL Milmns VS.. J A.
Mimms; G. B. Afford vs.. Carpenter
Bros.
Tuesday October 24.-Samuel Rogers
VS.. j. j. Penny and C. r. THOMPSON
III. G. Olive Company VS.. M IL. Wood
Mrs. Sarah b. MIpper VS.. Lovelace b.
Capehart; EnglishAmerican Loan and
Trust Co. VS.. j. w. Hinsdale ct al; G.
g. Cowan VS.. Cape Fear and Northern
Railroad Company; Alex. Weaver IS.
Kate Weaver.
Wednesday, October 25.-Eugene G.
Glenn, VS.. Ham r. Jones, Sheriff, etc; A.
j. Blake VS.. j. C. Maroon. Admir-. of
Marenda Blake; j. ID. Underhill Exec
of ,Milly Scarboro VS.. Ida +. Coppedge.
AdIm'x d. b. N. of Daniel Scarboro; s. s.
T'oley VS.. North Carolina Railroad Com
pany
Thursday, October &c. o. Ball VS..
G. III. Cox, L. s. Rally ct al; Mary e.
Manley and Walter Harris, Guardian,
VS.. j. C. Marcom, Admir-. of VIM Man
ley ct ais; K. NJ. Quigley and Company
VS.. Carpenter Bros; S. w. Smith VS..
Louisa Sanderford: The Raleigh Savings
Bank VS.. The n. G. Car Company ct al;
Caraleigh Phosphate and Fertilizer
Works VS.. c.. Il. Davis.
Friday, October PIX. b. Johnson VS..
y. @. Building and Supply Co.; Dewar
and Wilder VS.. NJ. NJ. Perry; Lenora
Jones, Adm'x. of Thos. Jones, VS.. N. G..
r. II. Co.; Alfred Jones VS.. Raleigh
Electric Company.
Saturday, October 2S.-Old Dominion
Guano CO., etc VS.. L. and NJ Woodlef;
State ex rel. b. p. Williamson, Treas,
etc. vs.. II. Il. Jones ct al.
SECOND WEEK..
Monday, October 30.-Fischer Lead
Co. VS.. j. NJ. Aver; Allen and Cram
ct al VS.. n. NJ Norris; Hicks and En-
lington VS.. Laura Il. Smith ct al; w. j.
Ellington VS.. Laura b. Smith ct al;
Davenport, Morris and Company vs. G.
I'll. Anderson and Company; Julia IL.
Buffaloe VS.. A. j. Buffaloe; w. A. and
W. w. Whitfield VS.. A. p. Fuquay; Geo.
O. Depoister VS.. O. A. Gibson and Car
penter Bros. l.. E. Love vs.. James ID.
Love; Carpenter Bros. VS.. 0. A. Gibson
and Fidelity Bank; State ex rel A. p.
Fuquay VS.. Ham Il. Jones ct ais; Emma
OVERLY vs. Charles w. OVERLY; Rosa
Turner VS.. !. w. Turner.
Tuesday. October 31.-J. G. Marcom,
Admir-. of Henry Pool VS.. David Pool,
ct ais; j c. Marcom, Admir-. of OVERLY
VS. Raleigh and Augusta Air Lime Rail
road Company; Il. S. Pool VS.. Chas. w.
and Eliza Bevors; Il. s. Pool VS. Chas.
w. and Eliza Bevers s. and ID. Berwan-
ger VS.. III. G. Dewey: j. A. Lee VS.. Par
Wis Hunter; C. +. Sewers VS.. Raleigh
Water Company; B. Il. Montague VS..
w. S. Wood; Henry Biggs VS.. S. s.
Bateheor; T. ID. Il. Arlington VS.. W. III.
Arlington; c. II. Sewers VS.. Raleigh
Water Company.
Wednesday, November 1.Wm. III
Page VS.. Hettie Page; A. h. Marsh
burn vs.. D. d. and Fl. G. Lashlie; james