The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1899-08-19

AT a point south and west OF the
Junction shaft on the north connecting
vein and the Rarus lode, would You
consider the JohnstoWn discovery vein
separate and distinct vein?
AT some distaucc east from that
point the YOUNGSTOWN without doubt
joins the Rarus."
'At a point south and west of the
Junction shaft would you consider the
Johnstown discovery vein separate
and distinct vein?'
For some distance from the surface
the Johnstown might be followed as
distinct vein?"
Mr.. Patterson repeated his question
for the third time: AT point south
of the Junction shaft would you con-
slider the Johnstown a separate and dis
tinct vein?'
1T might be so considered"
What is your opnion?'
Il consider it separate vein at that
point"
The witness was taken through d
course of examination on the geological
formation of the country and the Rarus
lode, during which he spoke about vein
rock on the surface Of the lode at the
east end of the Rarus lode.
Mr. Macfarlane. will you agree to go
to the ground tomorrow with one of
our witnesses and point out to him
VEIN IOCh on Ine SUI ldte VI ILLS LoilS
at the east end?"
After some hesitation the witness
said he would. and Mr.. Patterson asked
him if he would be at the office of the
Montana Ore Purchasing company at
10 o'clock this morning.
Yes, SIR
"All right: Mr.. Wiley will be there
and accompany you
II presume l may consider myself
ha ,1FNrr - +i,, Il of n NJ
pany Tomorrow" said Mr.. Macfarlane.
"Oh you don't want double pay for
tomorrow, do you"
Judge Clancy suggested that the par
ties make their side agreements on
the outside.
THE agreement is already made, your
honor" said Mr.. Patterson. and then
the examination of the witness was re-
sumed.
The witness was asked If at the trial
/ of the case in the United States court
! he did not locate the hanging wall of
the Rarus lode 260 feet further north
than where he now put it.
Yes, that was true at the time" re-
Piled Mr.. Macfarlane but there have
been developments since then which
show that the fiat vein also apexes in
the Rarus ground"
And you have widened the vein 260
feet at the 60 level?'
mo man can go into mine like
this, with limited development work,
without being guided by the develop
ment work done. In the Michael Dewitt
case / gave my opinion as to the hang
ing wall as shown by the development
work then done"
THE development work since the trial
of the former case has caused you not
only to widen the zone at the 60O-foot
level 200 or 300 feet, but has also caused
you to narrow the apex rs or so feet
has it not?"
II think not"
The witness was asked to measure
the apex at a point north of the east
side line of the Pennsylvania lode
claim, and he announced the result as
1856 or 100 feet. He was then asked il
he did not make certain statements al
the trial of the Michael Dewitt case re-
! lating to the width of the vein Mr.
{ Mediation objected to the question, and
the court said it was not proper tC
cross-eXamine the witness on the Mich
! ael Dewitt case. Judge McHattor
stated to the court that he was not OBJ
jecting to that, but to Mr.. Patterson's
argument with the witness.
The court then said the witness
should be treated fairly, and that his
previous testimony should be submitted