The Arizona sentinel., 1899-09-30
DISTRICT COURT.
The Doings of the September Term in
 Vuma County.

anu Oll hOiidbe N'~i SoO r the September term of the district court. Criminal cases are very scarce but quite a number of civil cases are on the docket.
 The grand jury completed their labors on Wednesday and made their final report to the court. The report is very short but to the point The same will be published in full next week. True bills were found against Jose Quesada, charged with grand larceny; George Wilson, charged with robbery; and Trinidad Reyes, who took shot at Ed Mayes at Castle Dome last spring.
 The charges against Peter Burke, John Stofela and Henry Walcott were ignored.
 The jury recommended that a fire proof safe be purchased for the use of the county treasurer and that the books of the county treasurer and probate judge be kept at the court house. It was also recom~ mended that the wall between the court and jail be torn down, the closets and the vaults filled up.
 The grand jury was composed of the following named gentlemen; NJ. J. Nugent, foreman; Frank Avila, secretary; J. E. Crouch, Amos Adams, Francis NJ. Riley, A, W. Townsend, D. c. Rose, F. L. Ewing; T. B. Bell, NJ. L. Pool, J. D. Mea- dows, A. Modesti, W. W. Low, T. A. Jordan, Mel Greenleat, Frank Webster, Edw. Nelson, Cash M. Smith, Donald Mcintyre.
 The cases disposed of or to be disposed of are as follows:
 Rinehart vs, L. c. Moreland; evidence to be transcribed and sub- mitted by brief.
 NJ. H. Kerby vs Guadalupe Mining Co.,; judgment for the plain tiff.
 Lindley ys. Mohawk Canal Co.,; continued.
 H. J. Walcott vs. J, E. Beatty judgment for plaintiff.
 Pierce Evans vs, A. VoIpin. judgment for plaintiff. Motion for new trial denied and defendant appeals.
 J. R. Ochoa vs, Dolores Ochoa decree for plaintiff.
 L. B. Clark vs. George W. Nor ton; continued.
 Eaton vs. Gandolfo; continued. l.. N. Moller vs. Yuma County Judgment for plaintiff for S3S.
 John NJ. Speese, executor, vs William ". Low; judgment fol plaintiff.
 E.B. Webb y8, Frederico Webb continued for service.
 Gaddis & Perry vs. J. D. Shack row; continued.
 Gandolfo vs. ". A. Phillips motion for new trial.
 Yuma Building and Loan Asso- citation vs, George A, Duke ant wife; motion for new trial.
 Gandolfo ct al. vs. T. D. Macleod ct al.; motion for new trial to bt heard.
 i ". A. Phillips vs. T. D. Mac Leod; motion for new trial.
 Territory of Arizona vs. Jos' Quesada; grand larceny. The jury wrestled all night last night witf the knotty problem but failed t( agree on a verdict and this morning owing to the sudden illness of ont of the jurymen; the jury was dis charged and the case continued, thC defendant being admitted to bail il the sum of $500,
 Territory of Arizona vs. JosC l Quesada; continued for the tern and admitted to bail in the sum o $500.
 Territory of Arizona vs. George Wilson; continued, with bond fixeC at $1,0OO.
 Territory of Arizona vs. Trinidad Reyes; bench warrant issued.
 Territory of Arizona vs. E, F Snider; charge ignored. Stoffela vs. Fain, being tried.
 The trial jury was discharged this morning, the criminal business ot the term having been completed. The following gentlemen were sum moned to serve as trial jurors:
 John DevIne, C. II. Rise, M 1 Winsor, ST., I. l.. Molina, E. A. Fleitz, James KInsler, T. Beach, s. B. Kinds, L. Esselburn, Joe Rath- 1 burn, James F.Vickers, II A. Com,