The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1899-03-15

500; between Terminus and Stockton,
; in Tooele county, $780,
. For repairing roads between Stock
ton and Deep Creek, $500.
For repairing roads between Vernal
and Fort Duchesne, in Uintah county,
5000, and in Gate canyon, Wasatch
county, $780,
For repairing bridges on Uintah riv-
er, in Uintah county $500.
To complete road in Logan canyon
between Cache and Rich counties, in
| Cache county, $500.
To repair road between Cache and
Rich counties, in Garden City canyon,
} | Rich county, $3.50.
For repairing road in Clear Creek
| canyon, in Sewer county. $500.
For repairing roads in Salina canyon,
. Sewer county. $500.
For repairing road from the mouth
of the Quitchampah canyon, in Emery
county, through said canyon to the
mouth of Willow Creek canyon, at the
head of Salina canyon, $500.
For repairing road from the mouth
of Daniels canyon to Lake Fork, in
Wasatch county, $500.
For repairing Duchesne bridge, 500.
i For repairing road from Cuffs ranch
to KamaS, in Wasatch county, over the
mountain to Kamas, $500.
For repairing road and bridge in
Provo canyon, in Wasatch county, $500.
I For repairing bridge between Midway
and Heber City, in Wasatch coun-
ty. 5000.
/ For repairing road between Sanpete
and Emery counties, through Ephraim
| canyon, in Sanpete county, $1,000.
For repairing road between Gunnison
and Round Valley, in Sanpete coun-
ty, $500.
For repairing Straight canyon road
in Emery county, $500.
| For repairing road from Castle Dale
to Price, in Emery county, 5000.
For repairing Castle Dale bridge,
Emery county, $500.
For constructing road between Cleve-
land and Green River, Emery coun-
| ty, $500.
For repairing road in Weber canyon,
in Davis county, $500.
For repairing road in Weber canyon,
| Weber county, 5000.
| For repairing road in Spanish Fork
canyon, Utah county, $500.
7 For repairing road across Goshen
! bottom and up Pine canyon, in Utah
county. 1890.
For constructing and repairing Price
| Vernal road to Carbon county line and
| to head Of Gate canyon, in Wasatch
county, $500.
For repairing roads in Washington
county. between st. George and Rock
ville $500.
Between Leeds and top of BelIview
Blackridge, $500.
| Between st. George and Hollis
ranch, $500.
For the construction and repair of
| bridges over Fremont river east of
! Teasdaie, Wayne county, $500.
For constructing roads across the
| North fork country, in Iron and Kane
! counties, $500.
For repairing road between Dugway
and Deep Creek, in Juab county, $500.
For repairing roads from Nephi to
Silver City, Juab county, $500.
For repairing road from north boun-
Diary line to Cove Fort, and in canyon
east of Cove Fort. in Willard coun-
ty $500.
For repairing road from Fillmore to
Deseret and Hinckley, in Willard
county, 800.
For repairing road from Fillmore to
Oak City and bennington, in Juab
county, 500.
For repairing road from Fillmore to
Clear Lake. in Willard county, $780,
For the construction and repairing of
roads in Grand county, $500.
For building and repairing bridges
over Fremont river, in Wayne coun-
ty, $1,000.
ated shall be expended under the su-
pervision of a person in each county,
appointed by the governor
Sec. 3. The state auditor shall draw
his warrant upon the state treasurer
in favor of the person or persons who
have performed work upon the i'm
provement or construction of such road
and who hold certificates signed by the
supervisor, provided for in section 2,
certifying that the work has been per-
formed by such preson or persons.
HOwEJ T, HITS HARD
Senator Bennion started to call up
house bill No. ia, providing for
changes in treasurer's receipts, but just
then Senator Howell arose with a fiery
protest.
Il am opposed to passing any more
bills at this session." said he. This
is a burlesque upon legislation, and I
for one don't propose to tolerate it any
longer. Let's stop this sort of bust
ness, pass the appropriations bill and
go to our homes. We are rushing
through matters which we know moth
ing about and which affect the whole
state, and it ought to be stopped
well, 1t seems to me- replied Sen
ator Bennion, that as long as we are
staying here we might as well be doing
something"
4 move we 'saunter until 8 /
O'clock" Senator Chambers said, and
tered.
AT the beginning of the afternoon
session house bill No. 152, by Jackson,
providing for having all state printing
done in the state and county printing
within the limits of the county caused
some little debate. Senator Wright OPP
posed it because. as he said it made it !
possible for printing firms to combine |
and raise che prices for printing. Sena- !
tor Howell was also against it, saying !
that ne did not favor any further rush
ing through of legislation without care |
full consideration of it, all members pos
sibie being present. Senator Tanner ia
vored the bill because, he said, often it |
enabled officers to take away work |
from the local printing firms. He |
charged that firms out of the state |
offered bonuses to County officers if |
they would give the printing to these I
foreign firms. Senate Wright had an
other word to say against the measure,
claiming that it was un-Democratic, |
and that it would encourage a combine |
that would bleed the state He said |
that an attempt had been made at the |
time the revised statutes were pub |
hshed by the local firms to have the /
statutes printed at a cost greater by /
$4,000 than that at which they were ul- |
timately printed in Chicago. Senator
Chambers said that this was mis- I
take, that the difference in the bids of |
the local firms and that of the Chicago
firm was but $500. Senator Howell |
said that already in house bill No. 1873 !
the county clerks had been permitted to
designate the newspaper in which no
tees should be printed. and that if this
bill should pass, house bill No. 1873
should have been recalled. He believed /
in the integrity and loyalty of the pub
lie officers, and thought these matters
should be left to them. Senator Tan
ner thought the rights of the people