The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1899-12-28

subsequently IL was proved that that Bible
cane from another family OF Humphreys alto
Mr.. Ames entered on a long explanation in
tse ri me tGRs nohns short oi enpo
tente could hnvs determined that the writing.
which he said m44t have pee tracing was
M Mr. r Weeks lung down the documents that
he held in his hqnd aud dronped that line OF
iieved and 80 was was Mr.. Osborne Mr.. Weeks
started in on the bysiness arrangsment that
M nId ih wS when he ansGy hmes
| territory he gave Mr.. Ames halI OF his lee 9nd
Hmes Sn GSIGo Td H Hp Win F bun Rmes said
| that he had been in California three years;
he had sold out his 20 Mr k nsvy
|, him on installments. Mr.. Osborne interposed
q lot q objections The Recorder Tni said , he
case where partners were standing together
kpsssy %' n eSgh Of the Zee You are to
receive in this casep' he asked
| q Under an agreement A. Yes. sir:
And he AN Gws. you am money iGE your
| AaEs's WORK IN THE MoLISEuS CASH.
Mr.. Ames went on and told little about the
business arrangement that he had with Mr.
| klnsley. but II, was not altogether clear. and
Of Of handSritins again and got from ths expeTt
| the statement that the only admitted hand
S S.s HHs s Of sa wSsn b SapS int?
question was TO show that tho expert's OPINION
was innyencsd BY the tact on 1aat ,, nc
was tho inference that II he had had
thehandwrltlng Of other persons. HE opinion
Was not very good on dates and while he
testityinG about the dates that he had formed
"xa 4n4i t and other dates about which Mr.
Weeks asked him, his partner. Mr. klnsley
who was in the audience. shook HIS head sew
When Mr. 1mos resumed tho stand in. the
afternoon he corrected his STATEMENTS ts,y about
the conclusion that MonepH hal written the
disputed handwriting until the 10Th or 18th OF
SAVING Sst INT wns the he is su M Weeks asked
him series OF Questions regarding when ne
that he had not begin his examination until
the oath Of February. but II was brought out
sS ia IN It'd fs Ssd sssu sp
mems Of the handwriting before and that hs
had examined casually photGGGraphs ana f,a
admitted nlso that probably he Ind talked
about the case Win Mr Snssy 9S viii, 2n hm Sas
fore the 18th Of February" demanded Mr..
w., Meek m da you not express an opinion In
VI might have talked with mr. rororterr,' said
T. Didn't YOU have an opinion? A. l bad 9
variety OF opinions was In the dark; had
O. How long dld you examine the handxrit-
ing before Won reached n couclusion1 A. Well.
| should say. three or four days.
- At that time did you know that Mr.. hins:
ley. your partner. had made a written report
| \. did not. except by inference.
% Oh sou knew It Gy Inference. did your A.
Mr.. Amcs then told how he had spent ono
the As.or House s With ESp"rts TomGn Of chi.
cago. Frazer o! Philadelphia. Hay OF Washing
ana * M N9 Ia hny. h ,MS
say that he had had rhotorraphs OF MolIneuX's
writing at that time, The, existence OF photo
| la Int inn lAnN
assertion S.-;S Of tie d"tenco that Moiinenx
TO us". Mr.. o.hornr's expression. was the
would not testify that lie had photographs. but
that Mr. u.botne suddenly gave him The inor-
nation himself. He said he would concede
sap % az that M @a S e be 0 T Weeks
Thea h. sall =, {, e. that Sunday you had not
writing ms" was vas idsntiSO with that on the wrap.
y, That was tho, ,iirst conclusion you came
to, was ~ 4: Well. the fact was that up to
that sunday that sreak OF was on fishing
. when did you form your nrs, opinion' A.
q Did you first form II In the District Attor-
r"y's onlre' \. | cant say. but got very
q Did YOU give any opinion the day you
entered tho District Attorneys Officer A.
oSn %H w r f. "a "a 6 }9a s' express
q. You formed your positive opinion on Sun
on the stand n the Coroner's inquest and
, sworr that Molineux was the man. did your
A. Yes. sir.
HIS COMPENSATION CUT
Am:,s COMPENSATION. Mr.. Ames said; Il
shall put in a hii! Tor $50 day"
q From Galitorna to New York; 4. Yes
YOU asEsd Gr. wax. T d." Eersd ~
A% Ef hid thu S S %" DAY and n'
! Mr. Ames was evidently very unhappy over that
D AMI hor" Grpdgc AGAINST the Comptroller.
- How much did you receiver a. don't re-
a u Did You nut in, a bill Tor. 1--WE days at $50
, | dag \ Yes. sir but the Comptroller cut Il
! down TO 80 day,nn tho ground that was
'nTs RmS Ssi next a. s tat he did no, pu
bi for anpIariin,EI before re- the May GRAM am
be sT In iii to- h ne hi. wort
y before. The May GRIND Jury which had bee,
o s"rvir.- h"irr" the Nav Gran Jury and pai,
4 by tho city Of New York you did not authcrIz,
= No" said NJ. ,A!m".' II should say that
had 'urgn't"n it
K city IN payment for your services, how mucl
: went to hin-lcy?, A, one.half.
= 9. ug"-haIt Il ,he amount collected o
. When lid your next service after the Ma
IA service begin? That Is. from when do you ex
4 pee, to he pnid now? A. .exEect TO be pai
~ IRON tho tim" lett home until the time | ge
N back LEFT there on the 25th Of November
~ . And yOuarc to get 500 u day including tn
- time 90 the road both ways? A. / expect to h
= pad for II.
;, this; | think he has gone into 1t far enough
~ this witness Is certainly not going TO be pal
10 for the time II takes him to go home"
{. - Well, YOU Rre going 10 be paid for the tim
10 that YOU spend until you get home. are 20
u not; s. ordinarily put in n bill for tho tim
10 until get back.
!" Mir Anos looked hard NJ Mr.. Osborne nm
10 Mr. Osborne looked hard hnck.
- q, DO you expect to he paid for Saturdays an
~. Sundays A. | don't expect to be paid for Sun
~ day. unless work sundays.
IT q. You have worked Supdays2 A. Yes
u: worked on" SUNDAY.
rr o. Is II not YOUR agreement that kinsley II I
NJ rccnivc hnlt Of whatever fees you get In thi
To case! Yes sir
g. o. And half the fees Of any case in tho Stat
10 ol New York or around herep A. That IA part
=. o. What not trueY A. The State OF Ne
~, York isn't mentioned,