Evening journal., 1899-03-27
COURT OF CHANCERY.
Considerable Business Trans.
acted at To-day's Session.
NUMEROUS CASES ARE PENDING

CHANCELLOR NICHOLSON FIRE.
sgDElD, WITH JUDGE sFlRUAlNCB
AS HIS AlSsOCiATE IN IfHE CIR
PITANs' COURT-iCAsEs DISFClsED
OF.
This mo.nLng the Maroh term OF the
Count OF ChAncary anu Orphans Court
Ifor New Castle o0uhsy convened at iIhe
Cougs House, Chancellor Nicholson
presiding, with Judge lsprianoe as his
associate in THE Orphans Court
The LIST OH CAUSES pending rs us fol-
l-ws:
Wllllam B. R-b.nson VS.. Jamss b.
NewliI, ct all Howard "a Vernon VS..
Young Mems Loan Association; The
Mayer and Council OF Wilmington VS..
J. IL. Addicks, et al; Sarah B. Conrow
vs.. sarah l3, Conrow at all; john A.
Cranston vs.. William w. GIoopas. ut AL /;
WI-L.am H. Lee VS.. Patnicl1 Fahey;
Caiharine Simmons. ext, ETC.. vs.. SAM
uel p Simmont. ct al; Ger.nude II.
WILSON ee al, vs Alfred ID. Warnen. 1t
all; Gertrude II. wilson, ct az, W. CHM
3 uel NJ. KNOX, ct al; sallle M. Bradford
ct a., VS.. George H Hoi.is, ct al. /;
Ejza Harris vs.. uhe Mayor and Coun-
cl CT Wilmington; Charles w ElL
wards vs. Jelhu L.. Allen, eli a.; Martha
A. Boyd vs.. James Morrow; Maggie M
Jamlson vs.. JAMES II, S. Gam; Margaret
r. BringhuiUt VS. Alfred d. Wanner, ei
- az; Mama Newell VS.. THE HauJmann
. and Fehrenbadh Brewing Company; AZ.
fred H. Ainscow VS. George w. Ainacow
! et al; john G. Hartmann, et AL, vs.
Security Trust and Safe DJposib Com
d pany; Benjamin +. Carver We. john c
b +. Carver; John C. Yoatman VS.. Edw1
s H. Gayley, at al; Henry b. Hanfcrd VS.
c walter S. Wood, ot al; Nehemiah Bur
o ris vs. Aiexamder Maxwell. Dai,
Sharpe VS.. Delaware Glass, Sand an,
I Clay C-mpany; Joseph H. Cooling VI
q Mayor and Council OF Wilmington
n John w. Pennington and Mary ~ PEN
y nington VS.. john E. Lewis; WiIian
u II. Hoim, one OF the executors ~ Nor
is ria Wilson vs.. Marry Wilson
5 trustee, q. al.; Samuel Kersha'
Y vs. Martin Lane George Tatnal
trustee, vs. Safe IDeposi5 and Trus
,e Company, Of Baltimore ct a.; Radhs
It r. Tatnall VS.. NIah.on M. Child; Sara
II j.. Crumlish vs.. Security Trust and Saf
Deposit O-mpany trustee; Edwin z
4 Williamson and Nicho.as sple1es "
le the Gordon Heights Railway Company
le Joseph Wilkins Cooch, executor OF Ma
y than II. Clark VS. Fannie Clark, ct al.
n John b. R,tchle VS.. Clement II. C,ne
10 dOn James Q. Bonner, vs. Allen Smati
r ct a.; Jackson and Sharp Company v.
New York Equipment Company ct al
Hannah NJ. Chadwick, e. aA, VS.. Elme
be E. Kirk, et al Robert @. White, at
n, torney-general, ct al, VS.. the Mayo
,o and Council OF Wilmington, ct al.
y Elza j. Nswl1irk VS. Arthur Co1burn
Fillmore G. Chandler VS.. Margaret A
Tun.
These are the partition causes: Dayi
S. w Caldwell, ct al VS.. JCeeFh chand-et
I'd ct a.; Cathartne Hastings, at all, VI
~ Harry Emmons. trustea ct al; esiat
n Jcssph T. Tagisart, dseeassd; zenn
er Thomas. Jr, VS.. john Thompaln, ct ua
n Rcbtul Campbeii VS.. Tabntha n Ben
a nsson. ct al; estate Patrick B. Finns
gan, deceased.
William S. Hlles and Willard sau.a
as bury Jr., were appointed to examir
s. Henhy G. swaynn foa admissln
s. pnact.ce i'm elhe Court of Ohancary.
~ on application Of Francis NJ. Walke
he the sale Of the property Of the laf
Joseph w. DemEchson, was conhrme
1T consisted cg four houses i'm Wi
mington and two Farms in MIL C9ee
hundrsd.
ay The following cases on the List we
- disposed ~: Howard E. Vem0l V
he the Young Mems Loan Association, 1e
tied; William II. Ias vs. Patrl,
lst Falhey, continred for argument; Cath
Use r1ne Simmons VS.. Samuel p. Simmon
's' ct a., Minnie J. s. simmons was a
70 mitted as adm.nisuatrix of aha cor
,ly plainant; Gertrude III. Wils-n, ct a
VS.. Alfred ID. Warner, ct AL, and sa1
ew uel NJ. Knox. ct a., ru.e made TO clio
testimony IN cixty days; Sallie
oe Bradford, ct al, VS.. George HlHOll
Nv et al, and Eliza Han.s vs.. the city
l.. Wilmington. continued 10 asoelta
who is 10 pay the costs; Maggie
ed Jamison VS.. James II. S. Gam, am iss
will he framed to the Superior Gov
las and certain questions OF fact WILL
nd before a jury; Mazda Newell vs.. t
nat Hartmann and Frdhrenlbach Brevi
Company. continued TO take tss