The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1899-07-31
COURT CALENDAR
Continued from Page g.
MIXED JURY.


HanakaUlani Holt vs.. Hamakua Mill
Co; ejectment. Dickey for plaintin:
{. Brown for defendant.
G. X. Iaukea vs.. u. Cartwright et al: /
quieting title. Dickey for plaintiff: I,
ou-McClanahan for defend !
ants.
kalau ". Eva Plantation Co. 81 al: |
trespass. Kinney Ballou- McClanahan |
for plaintiff: c. Brown for defendants |
). Ahmi vs.. Annie Waller ct al;
quieting title. Kaneakua-AChi-Joh
son-Kaulukou for plaintiff: Kinney
Observation-Disclosures Robertson VIII
der MagOon-S illiman-C. Brown for de-
PENDANTS.
X. Lazarus vs.. J. o. Carter: repleyin.
Appeal from District Court of Honolu-
lu. Davis for plaintiff: Kinney-Bal
lou-McClanahan for detendant-appel-
liant
Priscilla Z. Hassinger ct al vs.. Helen
b. King ct al; ejectment. Robertson
Wilder for plaintiffs;
Kinney Ballou-McClanahan for defend
ants.
y. y. \. Odds vs.. J. \. Magoon: tres
pass. Humphreys Hankey- Gear-Heu-
shall for plaintiff; Magoon-Silliman for
defendant
Soloman Kauai VS.. J. X. Sumner ct
al: malicious prosecution. Magoon-
Silliman for plaintiff; Thurston-C Carter
Andrews Humphreys Hankey Gear
Stewart for defendants.
Luika Kilinahe VS.. II. Il. Macfarlane
ct al; executors ejectment. Dickey for
plaintiff; Kinney Ballou- Mechanism
for defendants.
Mary X. Tibbetts vs.. s. NJ Damon ct
al, trustees; ejectment. Magoon-Silli-
1 ~ ~
| Clanahan for defendants.
Mele I'll ct al VS.. Haw. Com. & >.
CO.; ejectment Correa for plaintiffs;
Hartwell- Castle Weaver for defendant.
Benito Guerrero VS.. Anna dos \. Per-
ry: ejectment. Kinney-B allou-McClan-
ahan for plaintiff; Robertson-Wilder
for defendant.
| Kan Wing Chew VS.. \. VI. Brown and
c. F.. Chillingworth: trespass. Clark
Kanealua for plaintiff: Dole for de-
PENDANTS.
! Gulstan +. Ropert. trustee. vs.. Solo
mon Kauai ct al; ejectment. McCants
Stewart for plaintiff; Magoon-Silliman
for defendants.
Junius Kaae vs.. o. II. X l.. Co; re-
plevin. HumphreysH ankey for plain
tiff; Hatch for defendant.
Jessie Kaae VS.. o. II. x l. Co; re-
pleNln. ftUNlpuTSNS-tid HhtN TOT pltilu'
tiff; Hatch for defendant.
Kahai (w) ct al VS.. l.. Ahlo ct al;
quieting title. Poepoe for plaintiffs;
lC. Brown for defendants.
T r. Mossman VS.. 5. NJ. Damon ct nj
trustees; quieting title. Castle-Weav
.r-Achi-Johnson for plaintiff.
Eleanor X. Prendergast VS.. Pete
Martin: eiectment. Magoon-SillimaI
for plaintiff: Kinney Ballou-M cClana
han for defendant.
FOREIGN JURY-CIVIL..
Tuck Chew VS.. Makee Sugar Co: as
sumpsit. n-Wilder-NeumanI
for plaintiff; Kinney allou- MCClana
} han for defendant.
| J. o. Carter vs.. Samuel Norris: as
| sumpsit. Kinney Ballou-McClan
for plaintiff; Hatch for defendant.
= c. Bachelor vs.. c. Il. Wilson. mar
shall; trespass. Creighton foT plain
tiff: Humphreys-Gear for defendant.
NJ. G.. Silva VS.. c. 5. Desky; damages
a Creighton for plaintiff: Kinney BallOu
: McClanahan for defendant.
j. \. Magoon VS.. l.. Marks; assump
o sit Appeal from District Court OF Ho
nolulu. Magoon-Silliman for plaintin
Davis for neutrality-suspicious.
\. NJ. Brown VS.. Chung c. III. Chong
Z covenant Davis for plaintiff.
T. w. Hebron VS.. Charles /. Helm
Iassumpsit Robertson Wilder 10
plaintiff; Neumann-Davis for defend
ant.
+ Charles l. Helm VS.. F. p McStocb
: Ier ct al: trespass. Neumann-Davis "a
. lplaintiff; Dole obertson-Wilder "a
= defendants.
r J. J. Byrne vs.. =. !. Noeller; assumI
d sit. Kinney allou- NIcClanahau Il
Iplaintiff: Magoon-Silliman for defen'
l.. ant.
. Lum Sung ct al vs.. Marion NJ. Luz
l ing: action on contract. Magoon-Sill
=. man for plaintiffs: Humphreys-Hanke
for defendant.
Kahului r r.. Co. vs.. Haw. Com.
s. CO.: trespass. Kinney Ballou-M
IClanahan for plaintiff: Hartwell-Ca
tle-Weaver for defendant.
- \. r. Titlow vs.. Albert Whyte 81 a
= lassumpsit. CarthCart-Parke for plat
tiff: Hankey for defendants.
Eva Power vs.. W. II. Bradley 80 a
assumpsit. DiCkey for plaintiff: Hun
phrevs-Hankey for defendants.
Lee Kyau Cwl ". Lo Kui Ckl; sla'
\ der. McCants Stewart for plaintiff
IT Davidson for defendant.
III ]. +. Haglund vs.. y. L. Jacobsen: a
n. sumpsit. Davis for plaintiff: c. Brow
c. for defendant.
II. r. Hitchcock vs.. The Haw. Trar
ways Co. Ltd; damages. Davis T
plaintiff: Neumann-De Bolt for defen
ant.
Schweitzer & Co. vs.. Charles !. I
. shell; assumpsit. Humphreys-Hank
for plaintiff; Magoon-Silliman for d
PENDANT.
,se Charles F.. Bartlett vs.. Haw. c;
nd Mfg. Co. Smith for plaintiff; Kline
by Ballou-M Mechanism for defendant.
in II. J. Harrison vs.. y. NJ. Brown; !
eers plevin. Neumann for plaintiff: Davi
son for defendant.
zee \. c.. Mericourt vs.. Norwalk Fire
IN surance Co; assumpsit. Humphrey
Hankey for plaintiff; kinney-Ballo
. McClanahan for defendant.
. \. G.. Mericourt vs.. Norwalk r
Insurance Co.; assumpsit. Humphrey
Hankey for plaintiff: Kinney-BaliC