The Worcester spy. [volume] (Worcester, Mass.) 1898-1904, 1899-01-07

I
Physiclans are using the Pyramid Pile
! Cure in preference to surgical operations
and with uniform success. The remedy Il
| prepared by the Pyramid Drug Co. Of
Marshall Mich, and for sale by drug
gists everywhere at 30 cents and 81 per
package.
Send for free book on cause and cure of
piles.
------z- --------E
because they may have depreeinted tina
value Of their property under onth for
taxation purposes. he seized upon this
opportunity to abuse their friendship. I
do not claim that the gentleman did
not have the legal right, but while I
yield and defer to the great senator in
points Of law, I will never yield to him
outside Of that, because l represent my
clients. He alluded in his remarks To
his Inheritance and referred With pride
to his descent. Judging by the bitter
ness of that TRADE, / should say lie
descended from Sir Arthur Frances o.
the author of the Junius lettevA Dor
no more bitterness has been poured
forth upon occasion than that bound
up in his remarks. / 40 not noInplain
at being called q multiple OF God or
having 1t said that I must be divideG
by fifty-six to get at the quantity ID
the Deity, but do protest against hia
holding up my clients as perjurerrs
Perhaps there may he some excuse for
had been dictated to a typewriter, IL
had been put into cold type, prepared
brought here and opened up like ems
balmed beef such as they fed our army.
canned and with a smell that had piHs
pies on 1t. stained and tainted. What
good did It do the city Of Worcester
to know OF what was coming, TO HAYS
1t reported that Goulding would be
put down may go down. hut my
clients shall not be attacked In thia
manner without at least q manly re-
sentiment upon my part.
Gentlemen, you have heard All the
evidence and the arguments. We have
endeavored to place before you the
market value of what has been taken
| from US, nothing more, nothing less.
| We have used no arts, save only the
| art OF diligence. and have endAavored
to use only such words as are consis-
tent with reason II the counsel for the
| petitioners has at times been seeming
| ly overbearing and too inslst9nt on
| what we consider our rights, ascribe ID
to the nature of blood which arises
from freezing to 212 degrees Fahren-
| heit.
Gentlemen, give to these petitioners
a fair recompense for their loss Tak0
the value of the power diverted into
your own impartial Weighing. Set o
sum and add to that sum interest at
| the rate Of six per cent from June 40,
1895, and you will then have arrived
at a just solution of this problem.
Gentlemen, permit me to thank you for
your courtesy and forbearanos during
this long day.
| At the close OF Mr. GouldinE's aiEu-
ment, counsel for both sides filed re-
quests for rulings. The substance of
those filed by Mr.. Goulding was as fol-
lows:
That the agreement of the Leicester
Water Power Company constituted no
ineumbrance upon property owned by
them.
That the ten rod strip specified in
the taking, included the mills and ev-
erything else claimed by the petition
ers.
That Peter brook unites with Kettle
brook above the line or taking.
That there is no limit placed upon
the Leicester Water Power Company.
That no allowance can legally be
made by the city for the return OF sew
age water.
That the petitioners on Sargents
trench are entitled to recover.
The requests for rulings filed by Col.
Hopkins set forth that no petitions for
damages on the grounds Of increased
pollution can legally be allowed.
|
the point Of diversion is not more than
3616 square miles.
That Peter brook was not taken by
the city, and no diminution or decrease
Of market value in the petitioners es-
Inmates Is allowable below the mouth
Of the sewer.
That no mill buildings Of the village
of the Mann brothers has been talten-
That the canal from the Work pond
to the racks at the Mann brothers
mill il not part OF the pond.
That the petitioners for damages at
Arnelds reservoir represent three
fourths Of the ownersfhps OF the res
ervoirs.
That the Leicester Water Power
Company is not entitled to recover
That the petitioners sc the Millbury
Cotton Company are entitled to reoov-
err not more than one-half the damages
That no capitalization az a basis Of
damages can be at q less rate than siE
per cent
That no petitioners except THOSE ie-
gally holding title to or right In the
reservoir taken by the oity can have
damages computed upon existence OF
reservoir.
That the commission has right
to question the length of time In which
the water returns through the sewer.
! That the method or the plalntlHs OF
figuring damages from the water COP
tanned in the reservoir at the time pf
taking, In addition to the water OF TIE
water shed is mot proper or legal.
gal.
That there is no value in the Arnold,
Paxton. Mann or Marshall reservoirs
above the value of the land and struc-
lures.
: hat the value Of the shed purposes
for water supply ia to be diminished
by the amount OF the water taken and
actual water rights owned by the Lei
caster water supply district.
That no evidence Of amount of money
claimed or awarded OF paid the Lake
side Company or Mrs. Kent, should be
considered by the commissioners, and
that they have no right to rely on the
suggestion Of counsel that expert APP
praisers had in mind facts relative to
the Lakeside property which affected
thei- Judgment.
! Mr.. Goulding made few closing re-
marks relative to the Kent dam, and
! the chairman sl1Rgestpd that a ulap NJ