The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1899-08-24
THEY MUST SHOW CAUSE
Paltrovich & Roth Cited to Ap-
pear in Court.
CONTEMPT IS ALLEGED
They Are Charged With Trying to Con-
ceal Partnership Property-A Short
Session of Court in Judge Lind
says Department.


for the peddling business of the firm
of Victor Paltrovich and NJ. Roth, APP
| pealed to the court yesterday for an
order citing Paltrovich, the plaintiff
in the suit, to appear and show cause
why he should not be punished for con-
tempt for trying to conceal and make
away with the partnership property.
Paltrovich brought the suit for dis
solution of partnership and account
ing, and Roth, in a cross bill, secured
the appointment of a receiver. The re-
ceiver represented to the court yester-
day that he had made a demand on
| both parties for the goods and prop
erty belonging to the firm and received
from Roth all he had, consisting of IS
watches and one mandolin He re-
ceived from Paltrovich 14,3OO books,
four sewing machines, one desk, one
SHOW case, one counter, one table, six
crucifixes, two vases, five lamps, one
| lot OF rubber stamps, eight leases, 500
| collecting cards and two more books.
| Receiver Lewis says he is informed
| that Paltrovich has delivered to his
| cousin, one 1. Rubenstein, a tea tray,
| two silverware boxes, four muse
| boxes, one photograph, one pitcher, two
| rugs, 81 watches, IL sets of silverware,
| is ladies' chains So gold rings, IL
clocks, two guitars, one banjo, one vio-
| lin, three clocks, three ice pitchers,
| eight figures and five mandolins, for
the purpose of defrauding the firm of
the property. Paltrovich claims that
he sold the stuff, but refuses to turn
the proceeds over to the receiver, and
| the latter alleges that Paltrovich re-
ceived no money for the property but
that he has entered into conspiracy
with Rubenstein Both Paltrovich and
| Rubenstein have been cited to APP
pear in court and explain the mat
| ter.
Judge Lindsay held short session of
court yesterday morning and passed on
the following matters, which he had
| had under Amusement:
| Thomas Tague VS.. John Caplice COM
pany, motion for new trial over
| ruled.
| Mary Ann Hurley VS.. Patrick O'Neill,
motion for a new trial overruled.
Elizabeth Coleman-vs. Oliver M. Per-
ry ct al, motion for new trial is over
ruled .",'
John Yank vs. James M. Hudson
plaintiffs bill of exceptions to the or
uer of the court setting aside the de-
| fault heretofore entered, signed, settled
and allowed as correct.
| Ben Baker VS.. Butte City Water COM
pany, plaintiffs proposed amendments
| to the defendants proposed bill of eX-
ceptions adopted and the bill of eXcep-
| tons as amended signed, settled and
| allowed as correct.
In the matter of the estate of Will
] lam j. McRae, deceased, decree of final
| discharge of administrator signed and
| ordered entered. --.r. n
| In the estate of James Tuohy, de-
| ceased, bill of exceptions to the order
! of the court directing the executor to
| execute lease of the Burke and
| Balaklava lode mining claims to c. j..
McSherry and D. j. Ryan signed, set
tied and allowed as correct and ordered
filed.
In the matter of the estate of James
| M. Reilly, deceased, statement on mo-
ton for new trial and bill of eXcep-
tions. in the petition of Mary Madigan
| to revoke probate of the will of de-
cedent, signed, settled and allowed as
| correct.
The Boston & Montana Mining com
| pany yesterday filed replies to the
| separate answers of James X. Heslet,
H. Roudebush, William H. Young and
| James E. Dickey in the Badger mining
case. The plaintiff denies that at the
time it purchased it's interest in the
| Badger the claim was divided into an
| east and west half, or in making the
| deeds from the defendants to the plain
tiff Young still owned a fourth of the
| west half and that Dickey still owned
a fourth interest in the east half. 1t is
also denied that Roudebush has any
| further interest in the property.
| In the case of Lenore Brouse against
| Savin Lisa, administrator of the es-
| tate of John b. AsteSana. deceased,
the defendant yesterday filed his an
swer in court, in which he denies that
| Astesana ever executed the note upon
which the plaintiff sues, and alleges
| that the note is not genuine, but that
| it is forged, fictitious and void.
| The insurance case of Mary Cotter
against the Grand lodge A. o. Y. w,
which was settled by the grand lodge
| on Tuesday. was dismissed in court
| yesterday on motion of the PLAINTIFF S
attorney, the plaintiff to pay all the
| costs.
| $25 reward to any one proving that e.
| F. Mayer, 40 West Park, does not put
1 L.. 4