The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1899-12-12
Weeks, a. TO what my inteations are" Then
Mr.. Osborne read Exbibit III as follows:

Weeks, a. to what my intsotions are Then
Mr. Osborne read Exhibit II as follows:
Please md enclosed 800. for which send DR..
Parfers marriage guide. and greatly oblige, yours
truly. II. G. BlRSEr.
Boz, at. 257 West Forty .seco d street.
When he had done this, MI. Kinsley took the
paper an wrote the .oblge" after The manner
wrote the ' word ob iG from four more lot.
ters-all the admitted handwriting OF Moli-
Now, said Osborne to Mr.. Klnsey. Il ask
you what is your opinion. Did The lame hand
write The 'obiees,, in the Barnet letter that
The same hand did" said Mr.. Kinsley. in
'"How strong ia that opinIon'" -,
a, ~ as strong as an opinion can be- SAID
Now said Mr.. Osborne. state to the, jury
your reasons Tor that opinion" and MT. hlns-
ley went into adetailed drsrr rtlon Of the let
tiers, To the lay eye, there were many liner
writing. OF the other letters, Some % them un-
donhtadly were due to tho fact that the Barnet
other We written in or Una S" style i Mr.
hins,ey DEVOTED himself partiru arly to the
was due to pen characteristics. He noted a
ss camille In or the slant q the - in The
When he had flashed Sir Osborne said:
ONLY ONE OF 1.5O0OOO.ODO HUMAN BErSos
,, And now. Mr. KInsley. do you believe I.
this whole world could weite that word obliso
=. Mr.. Weeks objected and the Court sustained
the objection. Then Mr.. Osborne asked:
VEL whats whH, Is your ,9riTGion Mr K'nsiIey..
cannot believe s hn, r con S Sr
more than one person in tho whole world to
write the word. The last three .ttcrs, in
convinced IN my own mind beyond the shadow
f,f
Objection was overrul:d. and Mr Weeks asked
II the Recorder wouldn't please withdraw his
i ,SSilns for minute 70 enable him to say some
Mr.; Kinsley said that he had been examining
he1hd ANU ma fo H. nftSsE years.
human being s write the word 'obIIge in that
.Incver did" said Mr.. Kinslcy.
And IL IL your opinion that those exhibits
are all in the defendant hqndwrlting :"
p Ycs thqt is my opnion," said Mr.. Kinsley.
pose OF enabIing the proscrut on 10 prove d.n-
nneation by, connection - words. as Mr..
Sbt IT. IT, osTorna re READ TPl tina Go
words e no e,Shbi, F. and gr"qty oEigc. yours
reading Sahib, mig siSn pansc send md IStd
and greatly obliee. yours truly. II Barnet"
Mr.. Os6orno looked around to see the cfTrrt II
and got Mr.. kinsley to write the word "ubllee'
lr from ,s exhibit % the rapsr aud comT,te It
ent from the others Mr kinslcy replied.
there Is no charar' eris'ic difference"
MI. Osborne said: In your opinion l. Il
possible that two human beng. could write
the and obllge' in the sam" way" Mr..
Weeks was actually smiling as he o Iactod 20
the question:, Th" Recorder uy"rru a the OBJ
Il possible"
The ..oblise" OF Exhibi, II being put on tho
board. Mr.. kinsley went on TO cHu!nin the ;Ur-
nation OF the letters In the word 'ohlirc" in
that letter ond al the 9th.t-, and he pointed
the Letters n a.. Formation, o the
letter IL" One had NOR" rolling motion than
the other; one had nervous twitch. So.
but these diIercnccS IN the formation
o! the letters. Mr.. Kinslcy said wore
nothing. The lettnrs were practically tie
same II was the similarity o' the
last three letters. or. rather. the Inst
two letters, that wore charariSris'ir Us
did not explain very clearly why the a glrrpnrea
In some o. the letters were not characteristics
and In others were. The word find" was
taken ~ icN' and was written from 'hf"c let
tiers, The rs were different The ma and the
ID were not connected. The failure 10 com
meet tho N" and N" "a Ia" formation 81 aha
n and tho connection ho'wrrg the II" ND
the r. VI Kinsi"y swore were rharnctoristfrs
The difference Ia tho u.s. wa- not In nv
opinion" said Mr. kinslcy. "th" EXHIBITS ara
written by the same hand nn| ara rrtc'lctlly
duplicates" Mr.. kinslev's examination was
then susrended aad the court adjourned until
this morning.