The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1899-12-12

bpt tho witness said. Yes, did. and they
Surely your Honor :" exclaimed Mr.. Osborne,
have right TO continue the examlnatIon o.
by.your Honor's cross exami nation. Il.
NY Examination" said the Recorder with
81 beg your Honors pard9n meant to sicy
Then he demanded Of the witness:
hs a matter OF fact at that time you were
There were more objections which were sus-
Yes, but It wasn't about anything about this
case ] can tell you that. Mr. Osborne"
50 Yon have cousin who is az officer a1t o. the
og Mr Weeks o9scsd and the o ,dS Sp gas
ooIne hat he thought h ha gone lar en"ugh
and that Miss Melando ,shomld GO. AS she
stepped from the stand, Mr.. Weeks arose and
WEEKS OBJECTS TO THE REcoRDER's WHOLE Ex-
AMISATioS.
II your Honor please, owing 20 the con-
Inslon hat there was at times during your
many 81 tSs o ns.lIo; and answers in YOUR
nhonors examination And was thsreIore y, IN,
did not desirp to interrupt but was unable
TO make the objections that perhaps would
have ma 'e had everything been clear end dis.
tlnct. trust that your Honor will permit me
,n Ioh; certainly" said the Recorder. object to
Yes" said Mr. Weeks. object to each and
.".Gsriainly.a sid the Recorder. Certainly"
On the grounds that they were imma-
Yes, yes. said the Recorder, yes"
Ws Sfr %rrs sad s MF m the Recorder IF
they were mmaterial they were improper. I
will admit the, objection AMI overrule It to
And except" said Mr.. Weeks.
SAMPLES OF MoLISEvx's HAND PUT IN BIT con-
One OF the iurymen said he hadn't heard
everything distincty and the Recorder said
6e read by the stenoerapher. and this was
finish. After recess Dr.. Hitchcock was put on
testified to tho fact that the cork in the bottle
when It came into his posse-son and when he
turned 1t over to the police. DR.. Ernest J.
Ledere: the Photographic who has taken all
out Of order-and he Identified a lot Of photo
graphs which went into evidence. and then MIR.
eS"mna,o was hoE s.i ffrdnv sssr.
noon: got back on the stand Mr.. Osborne was
sS Sm 10 ss0J n MIN G sa w Hs EhG W ard
sad that 10 save time the defence would admit
tina! certain q the exhibits were 10 the hand
all OF the CORRESPONDENCE. that the District At
torney had with the exception Of the letters
with the exception OF the poison package I'VE
will admit" said Mr. Weeks, that these letters
are he genuine handwriting Of the defendant,
the handwriting Of the defendant we shall be
very glad TO give him more"
go don't want any more" said Mr. Osborne.
case"
kISsLrY LAYS BARNET AND CORNISH LETTERS
To MoLISEUN.
haI ~. 4
BEGINNING VI the trial. Mr.. Osborne wanted
Mr.. kinsley 70 20 to the black board and make
TO the handwriting Of the disputed letters The
defence objected. on tho ground that Mr.. Kins-
black Looked very different from black on
S White; ic had himself provided white paper
ley use these. and the RScSTder t s66nrht chat
should be done. SO the black board was used
G Tply as a back. Mr. Osborne ASKED Mr..
II, APPEARED in Exhibit 2. which i was
admitted Molinenx wrote. Mr Kin-lry wrote
Se o GSsG az hs the sad HHs tar as
stroke OF the letter. Then Mr. Osborne asked:
8. pii yGq ever ace or know man TO write
alleged Barnet let,ers?"
M DR.; Weeks objected and tho objection was
"pii you, eyeE, in your life sec a sc' similar
70 that asked NJ ostoSne. end the Recorder
hod?" Mr. Kinsley said he had. and thar hs
hai taken the word from the Peoples exhibit
Have you,evor seen similar 'ee,. excer, in
the nepers in this case" thundsrod Mr. Os-
sorhe, And Mr.. hIns!ey said quickly Il never
COMPARING THE "opLrGEs"
Mr.. Osborne then passed up a letter known
~ tho trial "a Exhibit II. and said that he
as well IA for a standard TOR handwriting II
was anot her document asking for A remedy ~
the Kind asked for in all the letters Mr.
Me"ks objected 10 i's q I'm ssipn on the ground
that therc was 10 sufficient proof o' its identity
70 .Nd"nc" tdat u had ever been sent TO any.
poiy or received by anybody.
.DNerruled said IN" Court.
please to let I'M eXrlain why I want this in the |
evidence. Please let me explain H." |
object" said Mr. Weeks - 10 the DISTRICT |
Attorneys making any argument after the OBJ |
lection has been ovorrul-d
-, hut. your Honor please. let mo explain this. |
Please. do, your Honor"
Mr. Weeks repeated his objection Then 10 |
eyerybody's surprise the Recorder said: The !
Court Will withdraw his ruling In order that |
q" District Attorney may state his rrasonsi"
Mr. Osborne said: thank your Honor and |
to explain how Exhibit H. in his |
mind, helped to straightcn his case because
Ike Exhi IL ]. u would help To- prove dcsrrip. ,
ton. Exhibit i was the letter alleged TO con- |
ain physical description Of the mur,lerar
Exhibit ~ Mr., OsbIrne said. would help In the
words were com bIn"d. All this time Mr., Weeks
was Directing. At last he said:
Do you intend to allow the District Attorney
q make these statements regularly after tina
court has rulcdf' and tho Recorder said with