Little Falls herald. [volume] (Little Falls, Morrison County, Minn.) 1889-1950, 1899-02-10

5
know this?
This question seemed Is rouse ilI hin, him
from his lethargy. He started up almost
fercely and said i: .'1s'as
5s''.W hat business is it Of yours "a "a
! ferreting III the matter?',. 81 .51.sSSt
Ny dear fel low, we are not dome, , II
out Of mere curiosity Each piece 81 in
formation we get hold Of we hope to be
one step toward your Innocence being
proved. = a: !. 4 ==.%s . .E #
George paced the cell with feverish
unrest. =. ~ as5.. IT'D s.x$S 5@%
Don't You think I would rather die
than have any evidence raked up which
may lead to nothing, and only serve to
show up the unhappiness Of her life?''
"Then you knew Of these men?''*s
II did," r.: .,.1.' ~ =: I,* s.,
did You ever ask her about them?'
Eyes" "~r:% 80 IT,. H.
"What did she say?'' Il ID.
"She told who one of them was. but
would say nothing more about them.
She asked me not to refer to the matter
again, and said if I cared for her
should respect her wishes in the matter,
and I did,"
groaned inwardly. Georges infatu-
alton for the woman was too sublime.
''Then can you tell us nothing about
them?"
"Nothing, except that if / believe
anything in the world I believe that
her connection with them was every
thing could have wished, and if YOU
are my friend you will respect her
wishes as I have DONE. -
Nonsense, George can do nothing
Of the sort, and it is absurd your asking
me. Besides, if Lady Florence Mostyn
was what you believe her to be, no
harm could come to her good name by
these Investigations, and unless we get
some further evidence on this particular
incident she runs the risk of being con
sidered friendly with two very indiffer-
ent characters.
said this with brutal frankness.
could not stop to think Of George feel
ings; it was his life / was trying to
save.
think his first impulse was to strike
me. He made step toward me with
clinched fist, then he hesitated and
said, with unnatural quietness:
"You seem to forget you are speak
ing Of dead woman and one whom l
wished to make my wife. :"
"No, do not, George, and it is that
very reason which forces me to do what
can to unravel this mystery. Only by
doing SO can we know her as she really
was.
George sat down YEARLY.
For Gods sake, Duncan, let US fin
ish this talk! What do you want me To
tell, you?'
"You just now said you learned who
one of these men was. Who was he?''
'He was her brother.''
'Her brother!''
Eyes. A man who had gone under
and whom she was trying to keep
straight That is all l know
This was certainly news and very
plausible piece of deception on the wo-
mans part. Here she was consosting
with couple Of thieves Her lover
asks, "Who are these men?'' zone of
them is my brother" she replies-"a
man who has gone astray and from the
paths of virtue and whom l am trying
to reform. And the robbery, reflect
ed, grimly, was the first fruit of this
reformation; but, of course, kept my
thoughts to myself
"Well, George, this is surprising in.
formation, said, land it may be of
the greatest uso to us. This brother of
hers must be found. Which of the men
was he"'
Il don't know. I have told you ALL
more than had any right to-.
II don't think so, old fellow: If any
information you can give helps to save
you, you may be sure she would not
have wished you to withhold it,
George made no reply. His excite
ment had died away, and he was now
gazing stolid]y at. the floor seemingly
unconscious Of my presence.
/ left him with horrible forabodings
in my heart. Even if he saved his life,
his mind threatened to become un-
hinged.
My next step was to find out if there
was any truth in the existence of a
brother of Lady Florence Mostyn. The
"Peerage' would give me this informa-
ton. 1opened the bulky "Englishman's
Blble,' as it is most appropriately
termed, and found the ducal list Of
Lundys. The present owner of the title
was given as Francis Guibcrt Mostvn,
sixth duke, Marquis of Lamford, Wis
count Dartrey, Baron Coulton, K. G.,
f. R. S., etc. He married Lucy, widow
of the late Robert King of Warra-
Warra, N. S. W., ard had issue son,
the present Marquis of Lalnford, aud
daughter, Florence. 1r.> :
That was all No other child was
mentioned. The Marquis of Lamford
was a. we'll known mana devout
churchman, a pillar Of the .state-and
he was the only sou. But stop! The
duke had married>a widow. She might
have a child by her former husband I
wired off at once on this point. to Wray..
and had his reply BY the next post. a. :
YES, : he wrote. i. \" There was a Child
"a boy Robert. He was about 5 years
old when his mother married the duke,