The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1899-09-28
The VILLAGE WINS.
The Court Spiked the Plaintiffs Guns
Before the Mlrick Damage Suit
d. Was Fairly Begun.
Moore, of Milaca, Gets Another YER
dict - Other News of the
September Term.

| ri OSS~A
The grand jury was organized and
wentSto work and the court took up the
work on the calendar. When the
calendar was called many of the cases
were Immediately disposed of as will
be seen by the following list of actions
continued, dismissed, etc.:
| CONTINUED.
axproceedings against the St. Paul
& Duluth Ry. Co.
Tax proceedings against the St. Paul,
NJ. & NJ. Ry. Co.
James G. Young VS.. Great Northern
Ry. co,
A. ], Lane VS.. H. G. Head,
John B. Heron VS.. Eastern Ry. Co.
Matilda Anderson ct al. vs. Eastern
Ry. CO:
Herman Kasperson VS.. Eastern Ry.
Co. y
Oloff Hultberg VS.. Eastern Ry. Co.
Ella A. Pillsbury VS.. John Goss g.
Son.
EllasA. Pillsbury VS.. Reed & Sher-
wood.
T. 81. Galley VS.. M. M. Ring and A.
F. Pratt.
A. Rines VS.. St. Paul M. & M. Ry.
Co.
Phoebe soule VS.. Eastern Ry. Co.
DISMISSED.
Prol a. 81
leo.
Margaret Guyette VS.. Eastern Ry.
lCO.
August Swanson VS.. Great Northern
Ry. Co. and Eastern Ry. Co.
Edward l.. Anderson VS.. Great
l Northern Ry. Co. and Eastern Ry. Co..
| STRICKEN FROM CALENDAR.
William F. Waldhoff vs.. Eastern Ry.
Frank P. Clark vs. M. c. Sausser,
guardian of Henry P. Clark.
3 Niels. Anderson VS.. A. J. Barrett
ct al. *
Sarah e: Barrett VS.. Village of
Milaca.
| Minnie G. Croft VS.. Charles Croft.
TO BE TRIED.
Andrew Lindquist VS.. Louis Ander-
son.
| O. A. laden VS.. O'Neal Bros.
A. L. Weinberg VS.. Robt. II. Sleeves.
| A. L. Weinberg VS.. Jennie B. Sleeves.
A. Rines VS.. Mary Fletcher Hospital.
Louis Rust VS.. Town of Princeton.
! Henry Schenk, VS.. Town of Prince
ton.
/ G. M. Cosgrove VS.. J. H. Norcross.
| The cases of Joseph Nokes and Ma
RE Rottier against the German Insur-
ance company of Freeport, ILL.,, we're
stipulated to. be heard by the court on
briefs, so the intricacies Of law in in
surance matters will not trouble the
jurors this term.
| Three applications for divorce were
heard by the court and the coveted lib
erty was granted the plaintiffs. Those
securing freedom from the CALLING bonds
of matrimony were Emma Bliss, Mary
A. Brooks and Samuel Bobo.
The personal property tax case of
the State against I. G. Patter-
son appeared upon the calendar but
when the case was called it was found
to have been settled, the tax having
been paid in full.
The case of J. M. Bolland vs.. O'Neal
Bros. ct al, when it came up for trial
was transferred to Stearns county.
In the case of John E. Moore VS.. A.
T. Townsend, Ida Townsend, Grant
Mcclure and the Village of Milaca,
an action for personal damages, the
jury brought in a verdict for the
plaintiff in the sum of 81, $50 against A.
T. Townsend and the village, but the
action was dismissed as to Mrs. Town
send and Mr.. Mcclure. A stay of 30
days was granted.
John Englund's case against John
Erickson was dismissed on motion of
the defendant on the pleadings, and
the famous case of Joseph H. Carter
VS.. Charles Malone and a certain yell
low dog named Bob, was argued and
submitted.
The personal damage suit Of W. H.
.Mirick against the Princeton Hard
ware Go. and the village of Princeton
came on for trial yesterday afternoon
and after the plaintiffs attorney rested
the court dismissed the case on motion
of the defendants on the grounds that
no negligence was shown /,
The grand jury has completed it's
labers and adjourned. Two indict-
ments were found, one against Charles
Freer for cruelty to animals and one
lagainst someone who is not yet in Gus