The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1899-05-11
Order Of Publication.
Anna Georg by her husband and next friend
j. Edward Georg, and Anna e. Neil plain
titfs, VS.. Louis f: Neil, Rosa Reichelt,
Daniel Reichelt Joseph Reichelt
Harry A. Neil and Gilmor S.
Hamill, defendants.


Hamill, defendants.
In the Circuit Court for Garrett County. No.
072 Equity.
The object of this suit is to procure de-
cree for the sale of certain property in Gar
rett county, in this State, on which the plain
tifs have lien for the unpaid purchase
money.
The bill states that on the Nth dav of Nav
1893, the plaintih, Annie E. Neil, was seized
and possessed of two pieces of real estate
situated i'll Garrett county aforesaid, known
by the names of ''Ex Post Facto" and "Eu-
genia, and that being so seized the said
Anna E. Neil, on the said 18th day of May. 1895,
conveyed the same to the defendant Louis
+. Neil at and for the sum Of sixteen hun
dred dollars.
That by the terms of said deed the grantor,
Anna f; Nell, reserved the payment of one
hundred and and fifty dollars to Anna Georg,
May lst 1891 and the further sum Of one
hundred and fifty dollars to the said Anna
Georg May lst, 1898 and also the sum OF one
hundred dollars each to the heirs of Cath
crime Reichelt. to be paid to them when they
shall seVerally arrive at the age of twenty
one years, also three hundred dollars to be
paid to Harry \. Neil when he becomes of
age, and four hundred dollars to be paid to
the said Anna E. Neil according to the tenor
OF ms prOnlSSory note of even date with said
deed, and did also reserve one room in the
dwelling house upon said land during her
lifetime.
The bill then alleges that all of said reser-
Na+ipns-are- charges on said real resttrre ind
that the amounts reserved to the plaintiffs
are long since over due and are unpaid.
The bin further alleges that the said Louis
+. Neil has failed and neglected to maintain
the grantor. Anna Il. Neil, according to the
terms of said deed.
The bill then states that the said Louis F.
Nell, ON the 18th day of October. 1888, eXecu-
ted q mortgage to the defendant, Gilmor S.
Hamill, on the above deScl ibed real estate
for three hundred dollars, which mortgage
was fOrecloSed by said mortgage ON or
about the 10th day of February, 1852 said
mortgage becoming the purchaser OF said
land under the foreclosure proceedings and
tllT said nrnnpptV nd hnI ,trllt
IN by said mOrtgagee subject to all liens,
StipulationS and conditions contained in said
deed.
The bill then states that Harry A. Neil,
hOSa Relchelt, Daniel ReichelG and Joseph
Reichelt are infants, under the age of TWEEN
ty-one years; that the said Louis L. Neil has
abandoned said farm and has removed to
the State of Pennsylvania and is now a nom
resident of the State OF Maryland; that the
said property is depreciating in value and it
is impossible for the said Anna E. Neil to
obtain her maintenance from said farm in
/ its present condition.
The bin then prays for decree for a sale
or said land, for a writ of subpoena against
the said Harry A. Neil, Rosa Rechelt, Daniel
Relchelt, Joseph Reichelt and Gilmor s.
Hamill and for an order of publication
against the said Louis f. Neil.
1t is thereupon this 10th day of April. 1899
ordered by the Circuit Court Of Garrett coun-
ty, i'll Equity, that the plaintiffs, by causing a
copy of this order to be inserted in some
newspaper published in SAID Garrett county
once in each of four successive weeks before
the nth day OF May, 1899, give notice to the
said absent defendant Of the object and sub
stance of this bill warning him to appear in
this court i'll person or by solicitor on or be-
fore the 18th day of June next, to show cause,
if any he has, why a decree ought not to be
passed as prayed.
E. h. TOWER. Clerk.
True copy, test; E.Z TOWER, Clerk. 1T