The Worcester spy. [volume] (Worcester, Mass.) 1898-1904, 1899-10-06
MANY DIVORCE CASES.
The Docket of the Superior Court Con-
tains Fifteen Cases.
CLEVELAND BAKING POWDER CO.,
NEW YORK.

The Docket of the Superior Court Con-
tains Fifteen Cases.
Things promise to be quiet at the
court house for the rest of the week,
The list of 5ury-waived and equity
cases have been made UP for next
week, when there will be a session of
the superior court lasting about week.
Judge Stevens of Boston will preside
and the court will probably meet In the
criminal court room. where the su-
preme court lately sat. Fifteen cases
are set down for hearing the first day
of court, but many OF them will prob
ably be continued. There is a long list
of divorce libels to be heard during the
term, none of them of especial public
interest.
The following cases come up Mon
day:
Harrison P. Murdoch ct al VS.. Clinton
Cooperative Bank.
Ware National Bank VS.. 2. A. Hub
ley ct ais and tr.
Charles C. Copeland ct ali VS.. Reli-
able Underwear Company.
Henry Rice VS.. Reliable Underwear
Company.
Lillian C. Bosworth VS.. Thomas C.
Plat ct al.
Revere Rubber Company VS.. Humber
& co.
Frank C. VIM VS.. Samuel L. Mer-
chant ct ais.
Willis E. Fuller VS.. William G. Sea-
yer.
Hester P. Hood VS.. American In
vestors' Company.
Thomas T. Thompson VS.. Worcester
and Suburban Railway Company.
Edwin e. Brown VS.. James P. Alb
bolt.
Charles Carpenter VS.. Francis
Wright.
Toussaint Langerin VS.. vitaline La
rose.
Jennie McGuinn VS.. Thomas C. Plat
ct. al.
Seattle National Bank VS.. Henry H.
Adams.
The "Blue Jeans company has left
town without doing anything about the
two attachments placed on it by Con-
stable A. F. Richardson. When an at
tachment has been placed on the box
office receipts of theatrical company
it is generally customary to give
bond to dissolve the attachment, but
the manager of the Blue Jeans" COM
pany did not do this. James F. Ryan,
counsel for the two former members
of company alleged to have been
owned by the present owners of the
Blue Jeans" company, says that the
case viii come up the first return day
in the central district court, and it will
be then set down for hearing unless
the matter is fixed up before them. In
case there is no appearance on the part
of the defendants in the suit then the
case will go by default to the plaintiffs.
There will be a naturalization session
of the superior court shortly.
Justice Lathrop has allowed the will
of Amos Nichols of Worcester and Mary
Evans of California. The cases were
appealed from the probate court.
Frank B. Hall, as counsel for the AM
erican Pants company, has brought suit
against Roukous & Co., dry goods mer-
chants on Front street. The case will
come up in the central district court.
There was a hearing yesterday before
Referee in BANKRUPTCY Charles A. AL
drich in number of cases. In the mat
ter Of Louis Gusterowsky, claims fwere
proved and allowed. No one was pres
emit but counsel for the bankrupt and
the meeting was continued for two
weeks. Thayer & Cobb represent Gus
terowslSy in the bankruptcy proceed
ings. The first meeting in the matter
of d. w. Roberts, bankrupt, was held
and claims proved and allowed. The
debtor was sworn and examined, and
Joseph K. Green appointed trustee,
with a bond of $500. There Were adj
iourned meetings in the cases OF John
A. Coutemache, Mary E. Brown and
Prescott ]. Brown of Westboro, Mial J.
of Northboro. William f.
Spring, Eugene A. Telch of North
A. Lesley Marble, P. c.
of Leominster, and Michael
]. Ryan of Gardner. In the cases of
Spring. Marble and Hemenway, the
meetings were dissolved; the other
m SOC xvara adioYtpnad for fo1tr xraaiye