Burlington weekly free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1866-1928, 1899-11-23

conceded that the property was in the
name OF Mrs. Norton. This close tho
case of tho State, the completion of which
had consumed less than - minutes II.
S. Peck, who represented the defendants,
Introduced no testimony and made no
plea. Chancellor Rowell then ordered an
injunction placed upon the Norton prem
iscs, tho work having been completed in
less than half hour.
The n"xt case taken up was that Of
Daniel Grainey of Winoosd and Maurice
Flynn. the owner of the property. f. l..
Graves represented the defendants and
stated that since the acquiring Of the
property by Flynn in Juna no liquor had
been sold on tho premises. No question
was made to the fact that the states at
torncy could produce evidence regarding
Grainey's case. ID. j. Foster appeared in
.Graineys behalf. The STATE offered search
warrants dated June >, 1899. and several
the same day ana ON July ., 1898, and
served on that day. Sheriff Reoves was
then called and stated that ne was &C
quaintod with the premises in question,
and that Grainey kept cigars, tobacco and
a bar. He found two barrels of beer there
I'm juno, 1899. A lead pipe led from tho
beer under a show case to the bar. Graincy
is now in the House Of Correction on Il
sentence given at the last term OF court
In the case against Maurice Flynn, the
defendant took the stand and testified that
Grainey was notified to leave on July 10th
after the witness had purchased the build
ing. Grainey left on the 9th He lived
in the building and did not care to have
Graney as n tenant An injunction was
ordered against both parties.
The next case was that against Michael
and Bridget Callhan and Augustus Ercn-
Ter. V. A. Bullard for the defense, ,aid
his client Michael Callihan was now in the
House of Correction. The record of a re-
tail liquor dealers license to Augustus
Premier & Co., was produced by tho state.
There was no defense and temporary
Injunction was ordered Ivy the chancellor
The State vs.. Charles Eddy Il Bros, was
called and il was conceded that the State
had sufficient evidence to secure an in
junction and one was ordered.
The case of the State vs.. Joseph Mitchell
followed and in this and the following
others temporary injunctious were order
ed -
". T.. Craven.
joseph cote.
T.. ~. Shattuck.
l. j. Doniip.
John and Ann Donnelly. In this case
service had not been made upon tho pro-
prietor. Daley
The cases against w. r. Chambers ct
ais, and George NJ. Delaney were placed
among the hotel keepers in the list of ca
SEES left for joint consideration.
The case of the State vs.. Michael Muir
ply and NJ. Mckenzie is not completed
Tho cnae Of tbe state ~ Louie ttar,tir
was also held omen. hut shortly before adj
iournment tho case v.s apain c,I1ed and
an injunction was ordered.
In thc case or tho St.t. We w o,c,L.
Ivan time was granted ON tho st3tcmcnt
that Mr.. o'Sullivan secured a licrrs. when
he believed n necessary. for nh,rr,,,,.ii'
and returned it on being enlightened. TN
der these conditions If U,,e d1eir,d =, -
some questions regarding hi. nndinrs OF
portsnoutb n II "
THE ARGUMENTS
An 90 ,b. ,,,..,... t,,,,.i... ,-.. ,,-,
of -. - 49, 49, 49," -
,b,,. u..i,., 49,, 49,, ,,1 49,, =, =, 30
,d,iros.,1 ~, wy ~ -, " 80
ba IA I'.o,, r,,,t,,, ~ 49, - I''' 80
had ~ l,no,,.i'5 ny Nh i"'i.9, W '''
,,,ore ho;,,r, ,,s, -. ',,', n..rilS'
l., o,,, 80 - itt li''. " " '"'
,,.a., i,,,,t 1,,,, Il Wv n''" - va Us ~
,a,to,, - ,t , ~ NJ, 7 wa - "
oIiont = o,, ~ ir,i.,,,.,. '''',''' :
" c,.,,a, ~ - 49, ",
,nasnd t,.a g.. - t'o''' anu
co,,n r. a,,.,,,,r w. MT, ,, ''',
nyigod ~, ~, ,i,,''.tt .',,' an '''l
10 ,b,. [ -, 10 t
if thev nrn to bn,., ~ boa,ir,, =, nav ~
because the states attoineF mas issued a