The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1899-09-14

sub curia; Semmes-PeddicOrd
7, E. Livengood VS. G.. w. Logue;
tried before the court and Judgment
for $59.12; Mitchell and Semmes-
Hamill
8, F. p. Strawn VS. Uriah Patton
and wife; tried before the court and
Judgment for $66.07; Thayer-Peddi-
cord.
8, Same VS. Frank Cation and wife;
continued; Thayer
II, j. X. Cowan VS. A. Shartzer; tried
before the court and Judgment af-
tirmed for $3.50; Hamill-Sincell.
12, Elias Miller VS. John Felty, Jr.;
tried before the court and judgment
for $3316 Thayer, Renninger-Sin-
cell.
TRIAL DOCKET.
1, b. w. Lusson VS. j. ID. Brenne-
man; non pros; Hamill.
,, Same VS. Urias Lichty; non pros;
Peddicord-Hamill.
3, NJ. G. Merryman ct al VS. Cum
berland Paper Co; continued; Hamill
-Sincell.
4, John Shartzer, receiver, VS. }. a.
Rinker; continued; Peddicord-Thay-
er. Sincell.
>, G. 5. Hamill, attorney, VS. +. H..
Friend; continued; Hamill, Semmes
-Thayer, Sincell PeddicOrd.
6, Z. J. Fredlock Mfg Co. VS. }. w.
Williams; MorrisOn-Hamill.
:, G w. Gish VS. L. Hachman; CON
tinued; Hamill-Peddicord.
8, Mountain Home Co VS. Loeb Lynn
Heights Hotel CO. trial; Mitchell,
JOhnsOn-Peddicord.
8, l.. b. c. List VS. Loeb Lynn Hotel
Co; trial; Peddicord-Mitchell and
Johnson.
10, County Commissioners VS. H. p.
Tasker; trial; Sincell-Peddicord.
II, State, use kreger e. Co.. VS. b.
johnson ct al; trial; Hamill-Thayer
and Peddicord.
10, O. 7. Mackin VS. j. X. Cowen ct
al; trial; Daily-Hamill.
13, James 7. Mackin VS. j. *. Cow
Ell ct al; trial; Daily-Hamill.
IA, H. b. Friend VS. L. H. Friend;
stet; Peddicord-Hamill.
10, State, use Jane Fike, VS. A. j.
Frazee ct al; continued; Sincell and
Thayer-Hamill.
16, w. J. Raley VS. Noah PyselI;
trial; Hamill-Raley.
II, Maggie Burke VS. Thos. Burke;
continued; Peddicord-Sincell.
18, j. NJ. Ringer & Son VS. J \ De
lawder; continued; Sincell-Hamill.
10, y. Frey VS. G. NJ Rathbun & Co;
trial; peddicord-Hamill.
20, W. H. Michaels VS. J. .. Robe
son; continued; Renninger, Sincell-
Peddicord.
21, j. Speidell Grocery Co VS. \. G.
Browning; continued Hamill
%, E. 7. Cecil VS. Sol Hoge; contin-
ued; Daily, Sincell, Williams-Ham-
i'll, Semmes.
23, w. H. Chapman 4 Co VS. O.
Reynolds ct al; continued; Thayer
Sincell-Hamill, Semmes
"a, j. H. Gordon VS. O. Reynolds ct
al; continued; Thayer, Sincell-Ham,
i'll, Semmes.
%, ID. w. Sloan ct al VS. \. knabE
y Co; dismissed; Sincell, Thayer-
HaInill.
26, H. Beckman VS. John Shartzer
garnishee, assets confessed for $39 q
and paid; Thayer-Peddicord
81, J. r. Osborn VS. f. Livengoo
continued; Sincell, Cook. PeddicorU
-Hamill, Semmes.
%, l.. Warwick VS. }. c. Anderson
trial: Hamill-Peddicord
20, Town of Oakland VS. A. G.. Ma.
son eft al; trial; Hamill-Peddicor
30, Alice Bryson ct al VS. r. Orcutt
4 Co; continued Thayer, Sincell-
Mitchell.
81, NJ. Schlossnagle VS. Geo. kolb et
al; dismissed Gordon, Semmes-
Thayer, Peddicord
30, ID. j. Blackiston VS. w. Angus
tine; disclaimer by defendant; Sincel
-Peddicord.
33, B. F. Miller VS. w. Ryland Co.
trial. Renninger-Hamill
"a, n. J. Crooks, admr, VS. f. c.
Browning ct al; dismissed; Hamill-
Sincell
35, p. p. Lohr VS. Josiah Bittingei
ct al; continued; Hamill-Sincell.
36, Josiah Bittinger VS. Geo. Wiley
Thayer, extraordinarily.
81, J. G. Anderson VS. a. j. Bonitield
stet; PeddicOrd-Hamill.
3S, A. NJ. Cunningham VS. S. Y. Da.
Wis; trial; ddicord-Hamill.
80, John johnson ct al VS. Clark 4
Mccullough; continued; Hamill-
Since1l.
New Form of Postal Money Order.
The Post Office Department has
adopted a new form of domestic
money order, which will be intro
duced gradually, or as supplies of the
old form become exhausted, at the
various post offices throughout the
country, after the 4th of September
The new form is somewhat smaller
than the one now in use. Its dimen,