The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1899-09-28
Another list of samples taken from

Another list of samples taken from
crosscut extending across the north
connecting vein, on the $50 level, was
| read; also list of assays of samples
| from the long crosscut on the Penn
! sylvania No. s vein. The witness said
| that the assays averaged in value.
| Three photographs taken by the wit
! ness and another gentleman were
| shown to the witness by Mr.. Scallon
He testified that the first one was a
/. picture of the Johnstown discovery
| point, showing the location stake. The
| second was a picture of the surface
| of the ground at shaft No. 5, at the
| southeast corner of the Johnstown
| claim. The third was a picture of a
| boulder raised on timbeTs at the same
| place, and some figures of men. The
| witness stated that the last two photo
graphs represented everything in the
| nature of an outcrop that he could
| find at the place they were taken. Mr..
! Hughes objected to the admission of
| these two pictures in evidence on the
ground that they did not show the
natural condition of the ground. He
| said he did not think the artificial con-
| dition of the ground produced by the
| men who moved the rocks around was
| proper evidence.
well, the objection is overruled,"
said the court. May be you object to
the men," the court added.
mo; we don't recognize the men,"
said Mr. Hughes. But may be they
are additional experts being introduced
in that way" he concluded, with a
smile.
Some more assays of samples taken
from points in the Pennsylvania Nos.
2 and veins were put in evidence.
The witness said that he did not find
any difference in the granite between
~. !.
of No. 8.
Before this was reached he testified
with reference to the photographs in
troduced. that he did not regard the
formation on the surface as rock in
place.
Il do not consider that the boulder
was rock in place. l was there before
1t was touched and it was loose" said
the witness.
The witness testified that he had ex-
amined the surface trenches, in the
western part of the ground, that the
plaintiff alleged showed the apex of
the plaintiffs Johnstown vein, but
had seen no evidence of a vein there.
He was asked to give. his opinion as
to the eastward course of the Penn
sylvania No. s vein from the point it
is last seen at the west along the Johns
town south side line He said that the
course is not developed, but that the
indications on the 400 level are that
it turns to the south near the angle of
the decided ground. There is a vein
developed at that point south of the
Johnstown south side line, which may
be part of 1t. The witness opinion
tended to throw the vein into the de-
PENDANTS ground as it went east.
Mr.. Word said that he had seen so
or So places on the various levels where
the east and west veins are cut off by
the faults.
"At how many of those places do you
find the vein cut off with no vein on
the other side of the fault?" asked Mr.
Scallon.
Il find S. places where the veins are
cut off and s places where there is ore
on the other side answered the wit
ness after he had consulted his note
book
What is the condition of the ore on
the other side?"
ut has a different dip end course
and a different form"
state whether you found any place
where the veins go through the fault ?"
Il did not ~
Please describe the ore between the
faults"
THE veins and ore bodies between
the faults are twisted, distorted, bro