The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1899-09-15

fendants apex map. Developments had
been made, he said, showing that there
is no crossing. He was asked to indi-
cate the developments which had
caused his change of view as to the
crossing of the veins He pointed out
the workings on the surface map. lie
said the workings were made several
months ago and that the examination
which caused the change in the coloring
of the model was made after the model
was painted. The model had been
painted for seven months. The changes
in the coloring were made recently. One
change had been made several months
ago. The other changes had been made
within the past week or so. They were
made. the witness thought, before he
received the opinion that there is
north and south lode. He was not GER
tain when the country between the
faults had been painted white on the
model.
The witness said that there is a whole
section of the country stopped out above
the $50 level which is not represented
upon the model; on the other levels, he
said, there are stopped areas also not
represented. This is within the faults.
There are also Slopes on the north con-
Meeting vein and the Windlass vein,
outside the faults, not represented.
'Then you have omitted almost all
the west end slopes on what we have
called the Johnstown vein?" said Mr..
Hughes.
Yes, sir; almost entirely" said the
witness.
He testified that raise near the sur
face of the ground at the east end is
omitted from the model; also the No.
10 Wine.
Now, Mr. Hayes, If you had put the
Slopes that exist east and west of the
faults on the model, would you not have
;rI ~f oInr Of nct
west veins that converge at their ends
on both sides of the north and south
lode you testify to-" asked Mr.. Hughes.
Yes" said the witness.
He did not think that the converging
of the east and west veins caused the
crushing Of the ground between the
faults. He thought the crushing was
produced undoubtedly by the faulting
of the ground between the faults. He
did not know whether the faults or the
east and west assures exerted the
greater force upon the ground.
Asked if the faults cross on the $50
level he said that they do not
He said that he is not interested in
the suit on trial farther than in the
way of his employment by the defend
ant. But he said he had recently made
a location at the northeast corner of
the Pennsylvania claim. in ground I'M
der injunction. He went into drift 200
rect under ground ana MADE the lOca-
ton. He ran drift 10 feet long in the
tunnel.
do you mean to say that you went
into ground, closed under the injunction
OF the court, gaining entrance as an
employee of one litigant and did work
there?" asked Mr.. Hughes
Mr.. Scallon objected to the question
on the ground that 1t was irrelevant
and immaterial. He said the questions
to Mr.. Hayes had no purpose except to
lay basis for contempt proceedings
against the witness. Mr.. Hughes dis
claimed any such intention and the
court overruled the objection, saying
1t was eminently proper to find out
what kind of claim the witness had.
The witness said that he knew of the
injunction, but did not know that 1t
applied to private individuals outside
the interested parties.
The claim taken up by him runs east
and west for 100 feet and covers a vein
outside the YOUNGSTOWN south side line.
He took up another claim also at the
east end of the Rarus claim.
The witness admitted that he thought
his claims would become valuable
should 1t be decided that the veins apex
ing inside the Johnston claim cross its