Richmond dispatch. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1884-1903, 1899-09-05
THE DREYFUS CASE,
CONTINUED FROM FIRST PAcEJ

tend 70 notify the other side OF MS h'i'i.'
Tie must testify under oath, TOT VIZ"
that the parties against whom ms '''-
dence Is brought should have all the guar
antees the law assures. Usxcitement
NJ Andre. n clerk OF NJ. Bertulus, Judge
OF the Court Of Cessation, testified 10
hearing Ileutcnant-Colonel Henry say 20
NJ Rertulus: "Don't insist. beg OF you
Above ALI we must save the honor or
the army"
witness also heard Iieutonant-Colonei
ueprv cav. leave me Esterhazy and let
pu Patty dc Clam blow out his brains
That's all ask"
BELIEVES DREYFUS INNOCENT
DR.. We'll came forward 10 deny that
ne had ever made statements attributed
10 him with regard 10 the guilt Of The
prisoner. lie had always believed Drey-
fus innocent. and he vigorously protested
against such allegations. Dreyfus' me
witness said. was a model husband. and
not a gambler.
NJ PainIcve. a professor in the College
Of France. followed on the witness-stana'
NJ Palnlevo extensively criticised NJ
Pcrtn1on's cryptographic system cl'lhs
I'm support Of his conclusions the OPINION
of n Henry P0incare. 20 MS mlhi thc
most illustriOus mathematician OF mode'h
times who In a letter the witness Ieau'
examined seriatm the deductions on iei-
tlllon and demonstrated their iaiiacy'
also pointing ont miscalculatons maoe
by NJ. Valerie.
General Gonse interviewed az this juno
ture. He was surprised. he said. at the
importance attached 10 the evidence or
NM Hadamard and Painleve. VI. Pain
leve asserted that both VI. Hadamard ana
himself had always been satisfied that
Drcyfus was innocent
As the alteration between General
Gouso and NJ Palnlove was rapidly Dc
coming heated. NJ. Labor interviewed. a
sharp passage-at-arms followed between
NJ. Labor and Colonel JoUaust' leading
20 considerable excitement
NJ. Labor asked General Gonse why ne
had incorrectly reported certain ihIo'-
nation he had collected.
Colonel Jouaust refused to put 'he
question. and invited NJ. Labor 10 STUDY
moderation. ". Labori rotorted: The
defence IS using its rights with the ut
most moderation"
Colonel Jouaust: No you are not. peg
Nou not 20 drown my voice when i am
speaking. Your very tone is wanting la
moderation Moreover, ] consider TIC
question unimportant
There were prolonged murmurs or as
sent and dissent at this declaration by
Colonel Jouaust
LABORI CORNERS GONSE.
NJ. Labor said De was surprised That
General Gonse had included incorrect in
formation I'm the secret dossier, and asked
General Gonse who made mp the secret
CCssier.
General Gonse: I composed one Of the
secret dosslcrs boy means Of annexed
documents communicated 10 the Ministry
but the minds Of an the War Ministers
were made mp before they had amy cog
nlzance of the documents.
VI. Labor: Does General Gonse assume
responsibility for those secret dossiers
10 July. 1895?
General Gonse: Yes. ] had charge Of II.
NJ Labor: How happens It, then, that
n telegram from the French Ambassador
at Rome sent by the Foreign Office to
the War Office. referring to payments TO
Estcrhazy by an Italian agent, was not
added to the secret dossier?
General GOnse: There We're plenty Of
others Al were not Included but only
the most important.
NJ Labori: Was the information Of the
French Ambassador at Rome OF less i'm
portance than the garbled conversation
OF NJ Painlove?
Colonel Jouaust: / will not put the
question.
NJ. Labor: why was information
against Dreyfus always included I'm the
dossicr and never any discriminating Es-
tcrhazy?
Colonel Jouaust: also refuse TO put
that question.
NJ Labor: All right. I think the ques-
ton itself fully answers the purpose.
CUIGNET on THE STAND.
Commandant Cuignet. who made up
the secret dossier, replying 70 Colonel
Jouaust. explained that he omitted every
thing obtained from foreigners. as inte-
rested and misleading 20 France.
LABORI DEMANDS ALL PROOFS.
NJ. Iabon commented in a surprised
way upon the fact that alleged fresh
proofs against Dreyfus We're sul spoken
Of. and demanded that all proofs be pro-
duced once for all.
Replying 10 NJ. Labor. Commandant
Cuignet declared that there were dOcu-
ments relating TO Dreyfus I'm dossier
connected with espionage in the 1ntelli-
gence Department.
NJ Labor said he must insist that all
those documents must be procured at the
secret session Of the cOurt-martial at
which NJ Cernuschi is TO be examined.
NJ Matt. who was on the staff of the
Temps. testified that the spy Guenee IN
formed him that the War once had IN
disputable proof of the guilt of Dreyfus.
and mentioned "A snapshot photograph
representing Dreyfus conversing with
military attache az Brussels
NJ Temps "a special commissioners OF
the railway police. deposed that he pho
tographed the bordereau by order Of Col
onel SandhcTr. lie had not manipulated
the plate with view TO concealing marks
upon the document
EFFORTS TO lMPLICATE PICQUART
When the fac-simile Of the bordereau
was published Henry and Lauth tried 10
induce the witness 10 implicate heuten-
ant-Colonel Plcquart I'm the Dreyfus reve-
lations NJ. Temps detailed successive
steps IN his Investigations, showing how
Leutenant-C Colonel Henry and Command
ant Lauth had brought pressure 20 bear
10 make him implicate Leutenant-Colo-
mel Picquart and their angry threats
when the witness report did not suit
them. They accused the witness OF being
Influenced by some one.
Replying tc NJ. Demange, NJ. Tomps said
that he had only once mixed up Esterhazy
I'm connection with the report. Esterhazy
had been seen at foreign agents resi-
dence which had two exits and had
other suspicious relations Witness had
found confederation of this.
ALLEGED PLANS OF FORTRESSES.
Detective Hennion testified regarding
the assertion TO the effect that Paulmier.
the valet OF Colonel Schwartzkoppen the
..gl.s