The L'Anse sentinel. (L'Anse, L.S., Mich.) 18??-current, 1899-09-23
THE MARRIAGE VOWS
The Ease with Which They Are
Broken Is Deplored.
Timely Discourse of DIR. TaImnge on
the Martial ReIations-uni-
form Divorce Laws Are
.... Needed.
Copyright. 1899. by Louis Klopsch.I

Copyright. 1899. by Louis Klopsch.l
Washington. Sept. II.
Dr. Taimage in this discourse dis
cusses "a question of national impor-
lance, which is confessedly ms difficult
as IL is urgent. The text is Matthew
1876: what therefore God hath joined
together let no man put asunder."
That there are hundreds and thou
sands of infelicitous homes in America
no one will doubt. If there were only
one skeleton in the closet, that might be
locked up and abandoned, but in many
u home there is a skeleton in the hall
way md n skeleton in all the apart
ments. "Unhappily married" are two
WORKS descriptive of many a homestead.
1t needs no orthodox minister to prove
TO badIy mated pair that there is n
hell They are there now. Sometimes
grand and gracious woman will be
thus iDcarcerated, and her life will be Il
crucifiXion, as was the case with Mrs.
Sigourney, the great poetess and the
great soul. Sometimes consecrated
man will be united to n fury, as was
John Wesley, or united TO a viXep, as
was John Milton. Sometimes, and gem
orally, both parties are to blame, and
Thomas Carlyle is an intolcrable grum-
bier, and his wife has a pungent retort
always ready, and Froude, the his
torian, pledged to tell the plain truth,
has TO pull aside the curtain from the
lifelong squabble at Craigenputtock
and Chcyne row.
Some say that for the alienation Of
all these domestic disorders of which we
hear easy divorce is good prescription.
God sometimes authorizes divorce as
certainly as he authorizes marriage. l
have just as much regard for one law
fully divorced as 4 have for one lawfully
married. But you know and know that
Wholesale divorce is one of our national
scourges. ] am not surprised at this
when l think OF the influences which
have been abroad initiating against the
marriage relation. For many years the
platforms of the country rang with talk
about "A free love millennium. There
were meetings of this kind held in the
Academy of Music, Brooklyn; Cooper
institute, New York; fremont temple,
Boston, and all over the land. Some OF
the women who were most prominent
in that movement have since been dis
tinguished for great promscuosity of
affection. Popular themes for such oc-
casions were the tyranny of man, the
oppression of the marriage relation,
women's rights and the aiiinities.
Prominent speakers were women with
short curls and short dress and very
lCng tongue, cverlastingly at war with
God because they were created women,
while on the platform sat meek men
with soft accent and cowed dcmeanor,
Apologize for masculinity and holding
the parasols while the termagant ora
tors went on preaching the gospel of
free love. That campaign OF about 20
years sci more devils into the marriage
relation than will be exercised in the
next 80. Men and women went home
from such meetings so permanently
confused as to who were their wives
and husbands that they never got out of
the perpleXity, and the criminal and the
civil courts tried to disentangle the Had
of woes, and this one got alimony, and
that one got limited divorce, and this
mother kept the children on condition
that the father could sometimes come
and look mt them, and these went into
poorhouses, and those went into an in
sane asylum, and those went into dis
solute public life, and all went to de-
struction. The mightiest war ever made
against the marriage institution was
that free love campaign, sometimes I'M
der one name and sometimes under am
other.
Another influence that has warred
upon the marriage relation has been
polygamy in Utah. That is n stereo-
typed caricature of the marriage re-
lation and has poisoned the whole land.
You might as well think that you can
have an arm in a state of modification
and yet the whole body not be sickened
as TO have any territories or states
poiygamized and yet the body of the
nation not feel the putrefaction. Hear
il, good men and women of America,
that so long ago as 1862 a law was passed
by congress forbiddng polygamy in the
territories and in all the places where
they had jurisdiction. Thirty-seven
years have passed along and nine adj
miDistrations, yet not until the passage
Of the Edmunds law in 1882 was any
active policy of polygamic suppression
adopted. Armed with all the power of
government and having an army at their
disposal, the first brick had not till then
been knocked from that fortress of lib
ertinism. Every new president in his
inaugural uckled that monster with tie
straw of condemnation. and every con-
gress stultiiied itself in proposing some
pinh that would not work. Polygamy
stood in Utah and in other of the terri.
tories more intrenched, more brazen,
more puissant, more braggart and more
internal than at any time in its history
James Buchanan, much abused man OF
his day, did more for the extirpation Of
this viIlaiDy than all the subsequent adj
minisfrations dared to do up TO 1852
Mr.. Buchanan sent out an army, and
although il was halted in its work, still
he accomplished more than the subse.
quent administrations, which did moth.
ing but talk, talk, talk. Even at this
late day and with the Edmunds net in
force the evil has not been wholly ex-
tirpated. Polygamy in Utah. though
IL 81 IN tNrantioad In cncrat