Morning appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1877-1906, 1899-09-27
(Cont.,uad From Second Page

III ia 80 - JllC IIShI hllI Si'i INV
of the three Ballots voted for Russell was
evidently and clearly rejected by the
Board b"ya;iee the crosses were made to
the left Of ne names of the candidates.
Two ballet were also found among the
returns La liked "SpOiled'' by the Inspec-
tors. E.t;r other ballots were found
among ia. oturnS marked "Iiejccted',
one of These ! st was offered by the Re
lator aHi ~ .cted to because the strip
COntaiu44- IIu number remained on the
right h::.l Il e thereof; as this ballot was
evidently cast without the strip being de-
tached uater the former rulings Of this
court, IA" ELECTION is not well taken and
the bail; should be counted for the Re
IatOr. IL the same Precinct objections 20
Relato.'- Exhibits Nos. ,, ) and I, which
were o. ,hn rejected ballots cast for Re
spouJont, aud for the same reasons,
should BE- c0uTAed for the Respondent.
Undc! ;"yse rulings the Relator gains
one yoto .rid the Respondent three votes
inLAl~ nr..inct. In Hamilton Precinct
OF tn" e".lr County, objections to Re
spon3o - Exhibits Nos. l and 3 are Sus-
taiucrI. |.:e Respondent loses one vote
ian tAio H.. met as shown by the count
made iT tHc Court. In Cherry Greek
PreciU"' De-. lie same County objections
to Bei#la.'~ Exhibits No and 3arasus-
tailcI 50 :rctious to ReIator's Exhibit
No :. w' -. is Il ballot voted for the Re
s%punicu. and rejected by the P"ard Of In
spootor~ j. overruled and thi~ ballot
counttt / .. lie Respondent. @ : jections
to Itoi=, Exhibit No. 5. which is a bal
lot Vo,a ar the Respondent and rejected
Iy ule j.. pottors, are OverruIod and this
ballot s.: id be counted for the Respon-
dent. ,H j~ections to Realtors No. Q.
another ballot rejected by the Board of
Inspect, and voted for the Respondent,
are ovcJIt.ed and this ballot counted for
the Respondent. By these rulings the
~Rcspout.3t gains three votes in this
Preciuet, n White River Precinct of
the same County objections to Realtors
Exhibit ~. are sustained.
In EN-, County, Lamoille Precinct,
obicciious to Realtors Exhibits Nos. l.,
Gand II :; @ sustained. In Ruby Valley
Precinct e the same Comfy, objections
to Respondents Exhibit No. , are sus-
tanned. III North Fork Precinct of the
same County, the count made by the
court Shows a loss of one vote for the
Respondent. In TuscarOra Precints, OBJ
jectiu 5 to Realtors Exhibit No. l., a bal
lot ca f. the Respondent and rejected
by tn Board of Inspectors and over
lOokri /" the COuI. in the former exam
lnatlon ut The ballots, are O|crruled, and
the ballo : counted for the Respondent.
In the same Precinct objections to Re
spondengs Exhibits Nos. p, % and %,
which al. ballots cast for the RelatOr and
rejected iy the Board of Inspectors, OBJ
~jectionS 20 two of which ballots were
overlooked by the court in its former eX-
animation, are O~verruled, and these bal
lots are u3e counted for the Relator. BY
these T;!..ngs the Respondent gains one
vote aHl he Relator three votes over the
Official cr mt in this Precinct. In North
Ruby Precinct of the same County o b
jccti0u~ o Realtors Exhibits Nos. , and
are Su Iined. In the same Precinct Oh
jectiou4 to Respondents Exhibit No. :
are sustained. In EIko Precinct Respnn-
dents objections to Exhibit No. l.. a bal
lot cast for the RelatOr and rejected by
the B0arti of Inspectors, are Ov%erruIed
and the ballot counted for the RelatOr
By this r;lling the RelatOr gains one vote
over the official count in his Precinct
In Hal x Station Precinct of sale
County ELECTIONS to Realtors Exhibits
Nos. l, /, %, IL, u, 13, IA and 10 are sus
tanned. IN the same Precinct the cOun
by the Court shows a gain OF one vote il
favor Of the Respondent over the officia
returns. This difference may be &C
counted for from the fact that Relator'
No. 6, Sadler ballot, was not counted b,
the Board of Inspectors, and is cOunte
BY the Court. In either event the Re
spondent gains one vote in the count. L
Wells Precinct of said County objection
to Respondents Nos. l and 10 are sus
tanned, IN Toano Precinct of said cOun
ty, objections to Respondents Exhibit
Nos. l, =, 3 and 5 are sustained. In 1C
coma Precinct of said County, objection
to Realtors Exhibits No. l to 4 inclusiv
are sustained. In the same Precint oil
lection, 20 Respondents Exhibits Nos.
to 6 in"ilsive are sustained.
In II ;nboldt County, LOvelock Pr
cinct, objections to Respondents E.
IDibN -''o ~ uild AZ " L
Kennedy Precinct of the same Count
objections to Realtors Exhibit No. l al
sustained. Objections to Realtors e.
hibit y =, which is a ballot cast for Il
Respondent and rejected by the Board
inspectors, are overruled and this ball
counted for the Respondent. By tn
ruling the Respondent gains one vo
over til; official count in this Precin
In Wiunemucca Precinct of said Coun
objections to Realtors Exhibits Nos.
and II are sustained. In the same Pr
cinct objections to Respondents E
hibits Nos. 9, II and Is are sustained.
Mill City Precinct of said County objt
tons to Relator's Exhibit No. l are ST
tanned. In Unionville Precinct of So
Count objections to Realtors Emil
No. | are sustained. In McDermitt P
cinct Of the same County objections
Realtors Exhibit No. l, a ballot cast
the Respondent and rejected by