Burlington weekly free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1866-1928, 1899-11-23
Ordered on Eleven Places of
Business in the City of
Burlington.
one DRUG STORE IN LIST.
Others Are A. II. Norton, the Caliihans,
Eddy Bros, j. Mitchell, ". Il. Craven,
r.. n. Sbattuck, =. j. Donlin, the
Donneilys, l.. Hamlip, Hotel
Burlington, and ID. Graincy.


ostcd spectators called together by the
most recent procedure in the suppression
of the liquor traffic in this county under
the provision made for injunCtions on tho
petition of the States attorney. The court
was a special session of Chanccry with
Chancellor j. W. Rowell presiding. With
many of the cases the chancellor was very
familiar having mad actions under the
same law. although a different provision,
brought before him during the last Scs-
sion Of the county court, over which he
presided. The morning session lasted I'M
til loon and that of the afternoon was not
adjourned until Gals in the evening. AL
most the last business of the session was Il
hearing in the case of the State vs. George
NJ. Delaney ana the ordering of tenn
porary injunction against Hotel Burlug-
ton, of which he is the PROPRIETOR.
! The majority of the cases brought Tues
| day remain undecided, although the
course of Tuesdays proceedings indi-
Gates a strong probability that tenn
| porarY injunCtions will be ordered in the
majority. Among the undecided cases arc
those in which most Of the drug stores are
named. In these cases it was agreed to
consider the actions in group and it
was in these that the strongest fight was
made. Arguments were offered by Judge
T. Il. Wales Seneca Hasclton and j. f..
CuShmau.
As a result of the hearing twelve tenn
1faf a IIsil Nr a.
cont ora Of tboe, is IN tbis civ, and andre
tbr,,, is no A. ,o,' Of I,sn,,b ,,o,-
vbirh II ,,.i.l ~, ,o,,o,,,t.,,,d r..,, rivon ,
verdict Of nrnuittn1 on Tho Cboreo If beinr
= romn,o, soilcr a. ~, Tact t,,,, az corr,
on adjournment Chancellor Rowcl an
nOrnccd that in event of a special session
bc,. sqth br ,vould boa,, rho,rt = Dozen
moro c,.oy NOT ,.,,l,. rr bo.,.i,,,, ,.,.tor
da, cr tI,., ,,r,nr,,,,o, ~, Na,o,,j,o,. %
mo c.s,e ,,birh ,,.,,, ,,.,,,,L iu a., ,rro,,,,
hinr. IorgoIv ON tho dnrisior of tho su-
,,,.t,,, Ca-,rt 81 ,,.,,i,, =, r1,,,,..t,,,,., ~,
COS which .,,o .i,,,il.,,
~, t,o..ri,,, ,,.'''. 49,. ,,.,,., ,,,,.i, ,o.o-
Ti t,'i,' 9.,,'..,,,,o, W. 3D., ,
~. s.,., 49,, - I.,'i, ..I ii, 49,. i,,,
snIr w. s,t A,,,no,. - ~ !! pro,,n tid
"Nir Atom. Mo- ,c,, ,,t,. y,
,t,. - ~,
bntbo Jii lava co,,,,d ,i,' C.,,no,ii,,n
o,,,'oiI ,t ,''' ~ ~ i,i ''oi
I '''e 'I.'' u.s. ,, ~ MS uVTNct "S
C, w.. "i',i0 N''''' ~
,,.,.,'Ii iii. t, .'e' 'i'i
S SoV'' iiNo ~ ~ W. NJ IS ~ Cno
ruu ,t 49, - i%it ~ ne Iu3n-
tIas,,,5 ,'" ,,,,,, an .onu 'n'i' '"'se
b.,.o .'i,d r,. ,.,r,, "a,u
H "Ilr"iIu iUl stNcr'' irH'o''ue'i's
a,''' ~ '','S ne '''n' '!'e,r T"s'H ,'n ne
Si.t't,n 80 g,t avn" "'"i' S'S
MA .'''S We IN. ,.
~ u'I"E III orurr L" 'o'lSuIl as 10 'hc
sI""p+'E % .he cases, announcer th"t ne
u'"'iStooH Vdt certain CONCESSIONS Woud
he inade as TO some OF the respondents
ptinS "'uEelStS ana DONG business at tho
pu''S 'a"ru III Ino several petitions as
w. III 10 'h'lr p'lhg hc"lSed phdrma-
OictY'
'h"hc'IIor RoWcl requested that these
CONCESSIONS. Whatever they might be.
SHo"lu We pIa'od on paper ANA the remain
utr OF me morning session wa .pcnt by
lHc inherent attorneys IN getting the
cases grouped and IN reducing TO writing
inc CONCESSIONS which they w"r0 willing
to make. me paper when completed was
state versus r. l.. TAFT ct ais.
STATE versus f. }. lieaupre ct ais.
Hllte vs. u. g. fellroS" ct ais.
state VS.. George A. Churchill ct ais.
state =. T. II. Colins ct ais.
state vs. Wills Anterior 1t als
state vs. H. ;. pclorm" et ais
state vs. Michael Dorm ct ais.
Stat" vs.. Ir ile Duhamel at ais.
! STATE rs William EoIso,, - o,,
60 60 w. ';uSr"r hoSSrI' et aus.
Stt ~. ~. ppHSoi"' eI ans
w. r-cp,' '"ps"ou
w. " ii%H ct as
~ ''1, :. i'uN''"hu ~ dlA
.".o w. II. Me- ucf ct ais.
."to ~ .'Iti" Ntl|aushin ct ais.
Ct"tc w. H. ialkcr et ais.
ct"t' W vary r. ToWcrs et ais.