New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1899-09-20
THE TRANsvAAL REPLY.

Kfuger's Answer to the Latest OispAtch
From Chamberlain.
PRETORIA, Sept. 19, The reply Of the
government Of the South African Re-
public to the latest dispatch from the
British secretary Of state for the col
onies, Mr.. Joseph Cham berlain, after
acknowledging the receipt5of the Brit
ish note, proceeds in part as follows:
The government deeply regrets the
withdrawal, as the government under
stands it, of the invitation contained in
the British dispatch Of Aug. %, and the
substitution, in place thereof, Of an en-
tirely new proposal.
vs. 1eThe proposals, now fallen through,
contained in the Transvaal dispatches
of Aug. q, were elected from this gov
5ernment by suggestions made by the
British diplomatic agent in Pretoria to
the Transvaal state secretary, sugges.
tions which this government
Acted Upon in Good Faith
and after specially ascertaining whether
they would be likely to prove accepta-
BILE to the British government. This
government had, by no means, an in
tention to raise again needlessly the
question of It's political status, but actey
with the sole object of endeavoring b,
the aid Of the local British agent to
put an end to the strained condition Of
affairs.
This was done in the shape of a
proposal which this government deems,
both as regards its spirit and form, to
be SO worded as, relying upon intima-
tions to this government, would satisfy
her lmajesty's government. This gov
eminent saw a difficulty as to the ac-
ceptance Of those proposals by the peo-
pie and legislature Of the Transvaal
and also contemp plated possible dangers
connected herewith, but risked max
ing them on account of a
sincere Desire to secure Peace
and because assured by Mr.. Chamber
lain that such proposals would not be
deemed a refusal Of his proposals but
would be settled on their merits.
'sAs regards to joint commission, the
Transyaal adheres to the acceptance Of
the invitation thereunto given by her
majesty's government and cannot mn
derstand why such commission, which
before was deemed necessary to explain
the complicated details of the seven
years franchise, should now be deemed
unnecessary and which it should now
be thought necessary TO declare made
quate. 81
nrther there must be a misappre-
hension if it be assumed that this gov.
eminent was prepared to lay proposals
for a 1--WE years franchise and . quarter
representation Of the new population
before the volksraad for uncondi tional
acceptance. AS to the language, this
government never made any offer such
as is referred to, considering, as it did,
such q measure both
Unnecessary and Undesirable.
|, The proposed conference as opposed to
the joint commission Of inquiry. this
government is likewise not unWill Imp Ia
enter upon, but the difficulty is that al
acceptance thereof is made dependent
upon the acceptance, on the side of the
Transvaal, of precedent conditions
which this government docs not feel sc
liberty tosubmit to the vol ana,
moreover, the subjects to be treated at
the conference remain underlined.
This government ardantly desires
and gladly accepts arbitrat ton, IS iii III
firm intention is to adhere rs the terms
Ito the London convent ton of 1884
The dispatch concluded NV brushing
that the British government On recon-