Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1899-10-17
SPANISH FORK.
Democrats and "citisens" favor Enforce
meat Of Laws Republican Tichct

Democrats and "titiFsns" favor InfureF-
meat Of Laws Republican Tichet
Special Correspondence
Spanish ForE. oct. ii.-Laft niFht
The city hall was crowded with Demo-
Gratis of both sexes Ca nominate city
officers. The following d. ihs results
For Mayor willard %. Greer.
For Councillors-I. H. Hale. Mnrlnua
Larron. Hubbard Tuttic. CHARLIE Monk
and Oliver Hwcnrou.
For WncordoraJuaaph Hughes.
For Nancy James
For MnrshAl-Morrlf Mnrtill
For Juaticc-navid r. Lewis.
There ore now two tIckcts in the field
for municipal nniccrH-th "CitlzenH'
and Democratic uckutH=aud q On prob.
able another VIII BE- nominated BY the
iiepuhl.Cans
Tho leading question with aii the nar.
Ties IL how best 20 control the saloon.
The Citizens stand pat Tor prohlhi-
ton while the Democrats ARE equaliy
ns anxious and jealous To- muster tho
great evil. believe that prohibition viii
breed private places in considerable
numbers whore intoNiclnts will be die
posed " in aplto Of tho utmost Wig.
llnnce. They point 10 the time. only H
Few years ago. when tho aaioonH were
forced 10 ciuHe followed by liquor nsHts
In sDVerHl paris OF fha city. ri ths dlfu.
Guilty ln making arrests. and occurring
conviction ana 81 the great amount of
public money expended iu the frultieHs
attempt in punlahing thoa- soqueretrei
doiers ~ death They aiso claim that
under prohibition a. much lau1r g. used
and that men and boys lre bought 10
perjury Doc order 10 protect and foster
crime They mdlntalu. nlHu. that mas
much 1a the taxable Unite of the city
lr econ to be- narrowed that the saloon
man could and would build him place
in close proximity 90 the city but boz.
You'd ita power and there hil defiance
to law. order ana dccuucy and Do tho
means OF committing ton-fold more
harm than when under tho surveillance
~ wen regulated police. HeHilrs AN
ih.H. there r. tho revenue question. Werr
The saloons compelled 20 cloac. the city
would lose much Of iia present lncom-
inr revenue, tnNcH would necessarily hu
higher and much public money would
have Go be expended IN Prosecuting the
private saloon man.
on the other hand. the prohibltlonlsta
-."tltlEena' claim that the nut-of-
town SALOON could not I've Tor want Of
sufficient patronage, ard that the illcgat
selling " liquor in private places could
BE- stamped out by united cnott. end
that even N some ono OF more ala
Illegal business their oncuHo would not
be- Haunted hourly before the public
eye and constantly be- an allurlug place
TO dcc0y tho youth 10 ruin. They place
morality ua against revenue. and with
emphasis ask the question. (which in
of greater value. O. Tow dollars or IN"
purity OF youth and the aanctlty OF
houie9"
The citizens or Prohibition ticket iai
For Mnyur-Honry Gardner.
For CounclllorH-Josoph wilkins. nl-
yld Williams. u. =. Smell. VIM JcS and
Robert Nickel.
For Rccnrdor-1caale =. Holt.
For Trpaaurer-Thom Jones.
For city Mnrshal-Ama Andrua.
For Iustlcc-NioholHa Smith.
SO far mo- 40 fecilnrs exist between
the respective ptrtlea. tho only differ
,nce o. na 90 the beet means OF accom-
pllHhing tho Same result.
lu regard to WuterworkH and light
lnF the city with electricity, the Demo.
crutu have Inserted plank in their
platform similar lu purpose 90 tho one
previously adopted By the "Citlzcua.'