The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1899-08-08

mo"
"You have no motive fog animosity
against them.''
mo"
And Col Picauartrs
II do Not know him."
And Lieut.. Col. Exterhaxyr
Il do not know him."
You never wrote TO himr"
Ne"
Cox De Clam says your writing az his
dictatIon was less firm when he made
yeu undergo trial on the day Of your
arrest
My writing has not much chauxed.' =
Here . on-commissioned oGacer. who
was standing In front of Nal carriere,
crossed the platform and handed Dreyfus
his writing on the day of his arrest Drey-
fus replied by Insisting that there was
aothins 10 show any pHcspttsse ehanes
In his handwriting
Jouaust then spoke Of the interview
with De Clam. and Dreyfus replied:
Il never confessed anything TO De
Clam
Condemned. Though Innocent
Here occurred one OF the most dramatic
scenes in the examination Dreyfus trc-
mendously excited. swayed TO and fro for
. moment. and then all his pent-up emo
ton and indignation burst forth, and In
. piping voice heard throughout the court
room. and even by those standing on the
outside. he said.
I'll Is ubiquitous to condemn an inno-
cent man never confessed anything.
never
Dreyfuz. as he uttered the words. rails
ed hts right whise-gioveA hand. ana held Il
aiafs, as II appealing to heaven to ytndt-
cate him.
Jcaanst then said:
AT the time OF your condemnation
Du Patty de Clam went to see you In
the Chcrche Midi prison what passed
between yous-'
pres fas-He asked me II had not CIV
en- unimporsant information. In order to
obtain other information. replied sNo,"
and added that II was Ubiquitous to con-
denim an innocent mar I also asked him
to beg the minister of war TO seek full
light ON the affair
Joaanst-ntd yea not say TO him. refer
ring to foreign military attaehe. that
you would cut hts throat with a rouiaray
preyfus-Ss; asked Du Patty de Clam
sala: "Any government which has
means OF investigating can have the for
eign military attaches questioned IL I
were ia its place. rather than have an
innocent man condemned. would force
them tn speak. even n had to hold
dagger 10 their thrcats."
Col Jouaust then said
Corning tn the day Of your degrade
ttsn. what passed between you and Capt.
Lehsan Renauis, What did you tell
hsnas.
pres sus--S Nothing. II was really sort
Of broken menelogue en- my part. felt
tha, everybody knew OF the crime with
which was charged. and wished 60 say
I was rot the guilty party. wish 90
make clear that tho criminal WAS rot
he whom they had before their eyes. ard
l said 'Leesan. viii cry aloud my In
nscence Ia the face Of the people"
Ieaaass-nsa ycu not say The n,is.-
lister knows I handed ever 3ecumenss~'
Tsreyfas~ Mo- IL spoke Of a minister
who knew I was innocent. I referred 10 a
conversation previously had with Patty
de Clam
ssnaus.-~pta yea say. IF I handed over
documents u was tie have mere important
ores ~ resusn~
ISrwysas-Ne.
Woman Spy In Rn~ Dlseta-
Earlier IN the examination Col seaauss
asksss,
HAD you relations with lady av,rs
m tho Rue Essss,.-'
fss.s fsss replied;
y hssi ~ Intimate relations with hes~
iosssss-~i se net rnesn frena a moral
Eesns ~ vsew. Asss from military y.ssms
~ view. TAss woman was suspected OF
sryfnv Why ssss ycu vs.ss herr
i~~sfEsa-f ensy isassssss that a, my trial
tn sSsa Msi. ssondSscn introduced me TO
bar and as sscn3risn hsasaw~s re- the in
sszsry servsu= ne easa. 10 have known u
sAs szs suspected
!s<s<sss-lsd ssc say ia three yeau ta<y