The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1899-09-20

one formation, it would affect the the
DRY of faulting advanced, but that he
believed they were different.
He testified to the non existence of
porphyry, at various points on the 900
level. Mr.. Hughes insisted upon posi-
tive statements based upon the wit
ness observation, and refused to ac-
| cept opinions, and Mr. Bulkly's answers
We're decided
| The $50 level and the workings at
| and near the surface came next. The
| porphyry bodies here were gone over
very carefully. The witness said that
some parts of the bodies of porphyry
shown on the map were projected, but
that the projections were proper for the
reason that the existence of the pro-
jected porphyry was demonstrated by
openings showing related bodies. He
said that there would be no sense in
dotting the lines to indicate doubt,
when the existence of the projected
parts was an inevitable conclusion, The
difficulty in Mr.. Hughes mind was that
the lines of the representative yellow
figures have the character belonging
to representations of things actually
shown to exist. Mr.. Bulky illustrated
his position by the statement that when
the head of a nail is found on one side
of board and the point on the other,
and the nature of boards and nails are
known, 1t is fair to conclude that the
body of the nail passes through the
board; Mr.. Hughes thought the nail
and the porphyry were not sufficiently
analogous to make the illustration apt,
but Mr.. Bulky thought they were.
The witness stated that he was
forced to the conclusion that the fault
ing took place from the conditions that
he found in the ground He said the
faulting could be proved without the
porphyry.
The witness was asked concerning the
exact position of a body of porphyry
shown to be east of the east fault on
the 700 level. This porphyry is near the
north vein.
Which of the fault assures is the
older in your opinion?" said Mr..
Hughes
origin said Mr. Bulky.
Then the dragging movement was
at the same time?"
YES SIR
Tell me where, upon the surface
you find the east fault fissure at the
south end"
I'm the railroad cut in Michael Dew
lit ground-the lower railroad cut"
DO you find the east and west faults
in the railroad cut?"
Yes"
How far apart?"
about Is feet vertically"
The witness drew a diagram to show
how the faults looked to him at the
railroad cut as he remembered them.
What material is between the walls
of the east fault. and what is the width
of the fault?" asked Mr.. Hughes.
There are from two to six inches of
discoloration, looking like a reddish
brown streak, up the railroad cut"
said Mr.. Bulky.
The witness said that the next place
he saw the east fault was in tunnel
No. near the railroad cut. Both walls
are to be seen in the tunnel. The width
of it there is from one to three inches.
1t contains a clay seam from one to
three inches wide and broken matter.
The clay is hard.
The east fissure is next shown upon
the $50 level of the Rarus and so level
of the Michael Dewitt, the levels being
coincident. The witness thought the
fault crevice is about two or three feet
wide there. He was of the opinion that
the clay seam there is about foot wide
and harder than above.
The 300 level shows three places
where the east fault is disclosed. 1t is
disclosed here in the form of three dis
tinct streaks, one west of another, in
the form of slopes. This was explained