Idaho County free press. [volume] (Grangeville, Idaho Territory) 1886-current, 1899-11-10
COURT CALENDAR.
November Term of the Dis
trict Court, 1899,

Following lS Uuc CdlcuVdT vi
cases in the forthcoming sitting of
the November term of the District
Court. Hon. Edgar G. st eele pre-
siding.
No. l. II. II. Pearson VS.. S. e.
Bibby and wife. Suit on promis-
sorry note. j. F. Ailshie atty for
plaintiff.
No. 2. c. f. Burlingame VS..
Colin Mcintosh, ct al. Foreclo-
sure of lien. w. N. Scales atty
for plaintiff; Willis Sweet atty for
defendant.
No. 3. Ii. X. Grostein VS.. Colin
Mcintosh. Suit on account.
w. N. Scales atty for plaintiff; !;
Willis Sweet atty for defendant.
No. 4. Jos. X. Vincent trustee
VS.. Mary T.. Davis, ct al. Suit af-
fecting title to real est ate. Jos.
K. Vincent in person; McNamee
& Morgan atty's for defendants.
No. 5. John Houser VS.. r. d.
Shearer, ct al, S. Hirsch & Co., in
tervenors. Foreclosure of mort
gage. w. N. Scales atty for
plaintiff; j. F. Ailshie atty for
Defendants Il. ID. Shearer and wife
and G. V. Watkins.
No. 6. Carrie M. Hartman VS.
David M. Hartman. Divorce.
McNamee & Morgan atty's fol
plaintiff.
No. Z. r. M. Sherman vs. A. H
PIummer, ct al. Suit affecting
mining property. Albert Aller
atty for plaintiff; w. N. Scales
atty for defendant.
No. s. Stella M. Baker VS.
Robert O. Baker. Divorce. Foge
& Nugent atty's for plaintiff.
No. 8. Bank of Caln mas Prairi,
VS.. Mrs. George Miller, formcrl,
Emma Louden. Foreclosure. W
N. Scales atty for plai intiff; J. F.
Ailshie atty for defendant.
No. 10. Vivian Hau ger VS.. Gus
A. Hanger. Divorce. w. N
Scales and T. H. Bartlett atty's
for plaintiff; Anderson & Anderson
atty's for defendant.
No. IL. VIM. Won Berge vs. c.
V. Watkins ct al. Suit on account
Fogg & Nugent and Geo. w
Goode attys for plaintiff; j. F
Ailshie atty for defendant.
No. II. First National Bank O
Moscow VS.. j. G. McOlintic. Sui
on promissory note. j. +. Ailshi,
and j. B. West atty's for plaintiff
| No. 13. Geo. r. Gregg VS.
Elizabeth Gregg. Div vorce. Fog,
Il Nugent atty's for plaintiff.
| No. IA. A. Maxey VS.. Studeba
ker Bros. Manufacturing Co. Sui
to compel defendants to canoe
mortgage and for dam ages. j. +
Ailshie and Geo. w. Goode atty
for plaintiff; V. Bic erbower att,
for defendant.
| No. 10. Studebaker Bros
Manufacturing Co. VS.. A. Maxey
Foreclosure Of mortgage. T. H
Bartlett atty for plaintiff; J. F
Ailshie and Geo. w. Goode atty
for defendant.
No. 16. X. Meyer vs.. w. S. M
Williams. Suit for keepers fees
j. F. Ailshie atty for plaintiff
w. N. Scales atty for defendant
No. II. w. p. Murphy plain
tiff and respondent vs.. S. E. Bibby
ct al, defendant and appellant
Appeal from Probate Court. NJ,
Duffie & Griffith atty's for plair
, tiff; McNamee & Mo organ and Fog
. & Nugent atty's for defendant.
) No. IS. Alexander & Freidel
rich VS.. Board of CO. Commission
ers. Appeal from order of Boar
to set aside tax le Wy. J. F. All
: shie atty for plaintiffs; w. \
Scales Co. atty for defendants.
No. 10. f. E. Risley VS.. Ge
F. Troeh. Suit for dissolution
partnership and appointment
: receiver. J. +. Ailshie atty f
e plaintiff; McDuffie & Griffith al
;. r. F. Fulton atty for defendan
6 No. 20. Columbia Improveme
= Co. VS.. John G. Gelbach. Suit ,
promissory notes. w. N. Seal
y atty for plaintiff; J. F. Ailsh
!, atty for defendant.
g No. 81. J. X. Vincent, trust
vs.. Bert Davis, ct al. Suit affe'
ing title to real estate. j. K. vi
P cent in person; McNamee & M,
IS gan atty's for defendants.
n No. %. George Mitchell :
n Lidda Mitchell. Divorce. Fo
% & Nugent atty's for plaintiff; J.
~ A;1chso a 49,, frr 1ofo,,Jor%