The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1899-08-30

and that the workings Of the west
crosscut and drifts rs, q and IL at their
intersections or functions with 1t were
west of the west transverse fisure; and
that the country between had not been
developed
Mr.. Brown defined vertical crosscut
as a working that cuts through both
quartz and country rock as it goes up.
Mr.. Brown pointed out where the ver-
teal workings from the 500 level con-
meet with the workings on the 700 level,
upon the 700 level map.
Mr. Brown said that he had slopes on
drifts Is, IL, Is and SO on the 700 level:
that the slopes were very wide on IL.
They are five sets wide at the westerly
end of the drift.
Mr.. Brown corrected a statement he
made in the cross-examination con-
corning No. 10 w:nZe from the 700 level.
His corrected statement on the sub
ject was that winze No. 10 goes down
inside the vein on the foot wall then
cross-cuts diagonally across the vein
and goes down on the hanging wall
Mr.. Brown said that the east trans
verse vein cuts through Slopes numbers
IA, known as the Big slopes, on the 600
level and that there are slopes on both
sides of it, He described the slopes at
the various points on the level, and the
position of the transverse veins.
Now, what do you say as to the con-
tinuation of the ore in this level?'
asked Mr.. Cotter at the conclusion of
the description.
1T continues across the level and
across the faults; it is the same ore;
and it is stopped at different places,
answered Mr.. Brown.
After this, the 500 level map was
hung up and the 800 level workings, ore
deposits, Slopes and drifts, transverse
veins and faults Were gone over. AS
a correction of his testimony on cross
examination, Mr.. Brown stated that
certain drift does not extend $50 feet
but $50 feet, east of the crossing from
the west transverse assure.
The 450 level was taken up, and Mr.
Brown gave a description of it similar
to that of the 500 level, and stated that
ore and slopes ran across the transverse
vein and the level in a continuous for
nation and construction.
Cross-section IL" again became the
subject of discussion Mr.. Brown was
asked if anything would show on the
plane of a cross-section unless it was
projected upon, and said it would not.
He said a cross section was a blank
surface upon which whatever was on
the side of the cut through the divided
object was projected.
Mr.. Cotter gave up the witness. and
he was subjected to a re-crOss- examin-
alton by Mr.. Scallon. He stated to Mr.,
Scallon that there were veins on the
900 level that could not be traced to the
700 level or to the surface, not being
developed.
Mr.. Scallon took another whack at
cross-section L." He asked the wit
ness if a cross-section cut or plane
would not show what was on either side
of it without a projection, and the wit
ness agreed with him in turn. The wit
| ness seemed to be an adherent of both
views regarding a cross-section, i. e.
| that a cross-section will not show any
| thing without projection, and yet VIII
| show the ends of the object cut by 1t
| without projection. The days proceed
| ings closed with the examination of
| the witness upon the nature of trans
verse assures, and the evidence devel-
| oped did not seem material. Witness
Brown finished his testimony and court
| adjourned until 10 o'clock tomorrow
| pinp