Daily capital journal. (Salem, Or.) 1896-1899, 1899-02-24
SECOND DAYS TRIAL.
continued from Second Pagc
AFrERNOoN sEssIoN.

The sheriff returned f0llOWing
twelve names as summoned from the
body Of the county"
Henry Workman. Henry Fletcher,
IL. j. Martin, Geo. 3. Gray, 10. Baker,
r A. Crossan, !. VI Lawrence, r. j..
King. J. NJ. Kyle, NJ. 5. SkiG, Guy
Powers, Chas. 5. RELY. NJ s. Skin
and Geo. b. Gray were excused as ex-
empt hremen. They we're nearly all
from Saleui and yielded 10 jurors.
I'M. Kyle u the Salem Fruit and
Produce Co. had no opinion or pre-
judice and was accepted by defence.
Hayden showed Kyle was related 70
one Of bOndsmen, had employed one
of defendants, his partner had ex-
pressed opinions that he had not coin
cided with, he had some Impression Of
the case as TO the guilt Of some one
aud the court excused him.
r. A. King had formed an opinion
that 10 would take evidence 70
change. Excused.
r. A. CrOssan thought be could give
defendants a fair trial and was ac-
cepted by defence.
"Bob, how long have you known
| Mr.. Richardson ;'' was the blunt
query Counsel McNary put at Crossan.
On top OF this he piled a score OF ques-
lions 70 show Intimate relations TO
the defendant aud he was excused.
Guy NJ. Powers had formed aud ex-
pressed on opinion and was excused.
Chas. 5. Rely knew Of no reason,
had no opinion, only glanced at re-
ports in the papers, knew all the de-
PENDANTS from his childhood, con-
sidered IL a very serious case, could
disregard all friendly relations, try
The case Just az II they we're strangers,
had served long enough TO be an ex
empt fireman but hao no certificate,
belonged TO secret order with several
" defendants. but this would not in
fluence him. The state exhausted It's
last Deremptory challenge on Mr.,
Rely.
j. NJ, Lawrence had formed aud ex-
pressed an opinion OF these cases. |
Defense excepted to him. Eolmts
vas satisfied with him, but the court
was not. Lawrence was satisfied In
his own mind and IL would require
different evidence 10 change II. Ex.
cused
l.. Martin had formed no opinion
as tu the guilt or innocence OF de-
fendan,, and was accepted by defence
aud state.
J A. Baker had employed TIL Ford
In assignments matter, had no feeling
against Richardson.
j. A. Baker examination; had
formed an opinion that crime had
been committed, but not as To guilt or
Innocence OF these parties, Defense
Tor cause. State accepted
him. Mr. Baker said he was not con
'ciOus OF any prejudice. Defense
again protested at his being taken, as
he heard part Of evidence on preum.
nary examination.
Court held him qualified but de- ,
enoe exhausted their NTH peremp
.ory challenge on him.
Henry Workman was examined 3
At this point 5, 4, Richardson walked
% the clOukroum door, The court
allied him back aud told him he must !
rot leave the courtroom during The
rial.
81 was not leaving the courtroom,
'uur Honor said Richardson.
BE seated, said the court.
Workman was accepted by defense.
lie had no opinion, although was
rlend; had talked with Seth Hammer
od Hayden in "a joking way; also
Win Jay BoNerman; had no interest
Xcert as citizen, Accepted hy
tate.
Henry Fletcher Defense developed
hat he belonged 10 some grange with
udge Boise, and that was enough Tor
hem TO object 10 his being Juror.
They showed he had fixed
pinion and II would take evidence 10 \
emovc the same. Excused, "
The court ordered the sherin TO
ummon ten more jurors. Court ad-
lurned 90 pa, m. saturday.