The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1899-01-21
DAY AMONG THE COURTS
Volume II Business Light d Most Il he
Departments,
VERDICT FOR OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES
Probate MNttern Disposed, OF by
JudEc vnsmer--Othcr Pro-
cccdinEs.


civil district court returned a verdict for
the defcrdnnt In the case Of i. l.. Levy
against ]. Rosenberg, in which the plaintiff
sought to recover damages alleged TO have
resulted from the proximity Of his house
to stable built by the defendant. An In
Junction was also asked for. At tho close
OF this case that of Cora allen against A.
\. Lincoln ct al was taken up.
In the Eleventh civil district court Judge
Tod disposed of an unusually large num-
Der OF suits
In addition to the regular civil cases ON
his calendar for the day. County Judge
vasmer entered orders In several probate
cases.
Eleventh Civil Dlstrict Court.
w. 7. Long VS., J. NJ. Blair OF al; motion
and request for findings OF law and fact
granted.
W. c. wasley vs.. w. b. Turner same
order.
Z. g. Mceker VS.. G. NJ. Meekcr; motion
for new trial overrulcd
Il. b. White ct al VS., G. A. Elmcn ct al;
judgment for defendant. Mrs Dora Ehrcn-
dorf, for $500 and interest,
j. w. Sam VIZ. p. Nj. olivier; judgment
for plaintiff for amount sued Tor.
i. Nj. Ponce VS.. 7. w. House. receivers;
continued to hear contest of pauper's oath.
Mrs. Mary Il, Bojac VS.. Jacob iornber-
ger ct al; continued generally.
ID. T.. Williams VS.. l.. w. Allen, judg.
ment by agreement for plaintiff for $3.50.
Louis Butler VS.. Omaha and South Texas
Land Company; continued generally.
Vito salvaggio VS. Houston Electric
Street Railway Company; continued for
service
Howard Il. Smith VS.. r. A. Moers; judg-
inent for plaintiff for amount sued fors
| Cornela Seipert VS.. w. P. Seibert; judg-
ment for plaintlff for divorce; Preston
street saloon ndjudged community prop
erty; other personal property as per de-
cree on file; Judgment for plaintiff for SIS
attorneys fees and for alimony heretofore
allowed and unpaid to date.
w. 4. Long ct al VS.. ]. NJ. Blair ct al;
Judgment for defendants -plaintiff excerpts
and gives notice OF appeal.
George H. Breaker VS.. Charles p. Shcarn
ct al continued generally.
7. M. Ponce VS.. T. w. House. receiver;
3leave to defendant to file first amended
| original answer.
! A. C. Hart vs.. ]. II. Brady ct al; plain
tiff granted leave to file second amended
4 original petition.
/ G. w. Bocock VS.. b. A. Riesner; con-
tinued generally. M
i Wilhelmine Scheifer ct al VS.. ]. -. HIT
4 cheson ct al; continued generally.
Edgar M. Westervelt VS.. G. r. Seml,e
4 ct al. continued generally.
Maggie r. Graham vs. Arthur Graham;
4 Judgment for plaintiff for divorce and res
toration OF maiden name.
j w. G. Wagley VS.. w. B. Turner: judg-
ment for the defendant to which plaintiff
excerpts and gives notice Of appeal.
4 ]. T. D.. Wilson vs.. Mrs. NJ Gallagher;
! Judgment for defendant, J. M. Blair to
which plaintiff excerpts and gives notice Of
! appeal
| M w. Frank vs. A. n. Anderson ct al;
continued by plaintiff.
Ez parte Teda e. Tourney: application
for removal Of disabilities Of minority
granted.
Fifty-nfth civil District Court.
4 L. l.. Levy VS.. I. Rosenberg; verdict
and judgment for defendant
4 Cora Allen vs.. A. +. Lincoln ct al; Oh
trial.
County Court.
i t. L. Larkin VS. Joe Dana; verdict for
) plaintiff for $50.
). IL. Jiegerman vs.. San Antonio and
Arkansas Pass Railway Company; jury and
verdict for the defendant.
PROBATE COURT.
Estate of Ewing Gregory, minor; inven-
tory and appraisement examined and ap
proved; the guardian Is cited to appear
and show cause why she should not file q
II bond In double the amount OF the value OF
the estate, the bond herein filed being fol-
only $4,000, when the estate is appraised
at $4,000
Estate OF William r. Rice, deceased; In
| md on oiua ant ~