The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1899-11-18
THE COURT RECORD.
Supreme Court.

supreme SOuTt'
$685. ert0n vs. Board Of cGmT 9nTdSn
e. J.-This cause is affirmed upon the au-
thority OF Kline VS.. Board Q52 Ind, S1)
Appellate Court.
1892. Ibach VS.. Huntington Light. ETC., co.
Il. If a company furnishing natural gas TO
consumers negligently increases the press
ure OF gas in a consumers pipe so be-
yond the accustomed pressure as TO over
heat the consumers stove and set fire to
his house, the consumer being without fault,
the company is liable for re damages :
changing of a small mixer for a larger
mixer" over the consumers protest 1t
must be shown that the company furnishing
the gas was bound 10 furnish the consumer
with such mixer as he wished. ?. Where
a consumer OF gas for fuel knows the man.
ner of regulating the flow of gas in his stove
and makes no attempt to regulate it and
damage is sustained by overhead he cannot
complain.
1909. Owen VS.. Ramsay. Greene c. C. AZ
firmed Wiley. J.-Where persons received
certain bonds from a county treasurer for
the construction Of a gravel road, and they
employed a broker to sell the bonds on a
commission specified between them, and the
contract contained the following provision:
That said parties of the first part the
bondholders) agree that said party of the
second part Ghe broker) shall have the
sale of said bonds for ten days on
bonds G to be delivered fF and paid for as soon
as the legality of said bonds is established
to the satisfaction of the purchasers, $4,000
of the second part agrees to deliver said
bonds to the purchaser free of expense to
said parties OF first part, in consideration
OF which said parties OF the first part agree
to pay the broker for making said sale a
certain compensation, Ito be paid out Of the
second payment Of money realized from
such sale of bonos, held that such provision
in the contract was a condition precedent
which must be fulfilled, and the second pay
ment provided for must be made to entitle
fha nlor 70 &c
1852 Roche VS.. Union Trust Company.
Marion c. c. Affirmed by agreement.
Sl,2 Jessew vs.. Pierce Newton c. c.
3Oo6. Armstrong VS.. State ex rel. Blank
enbaker. Delaware c. c. Motion to dis
miss overruled.
3215. Comstock VS.. Brandon. Wells, C..
c. Petition to amend assignment Of errors
granted.
Superior Court.
Room John L. McMaster, Judge.
John Castillo VS.. Jennie Castillo: divorce
Plaintiff dismisses. Judgment against plain
tiff for costs.
Nancy Reed; Administrator. vs.. City
by jury.
Room 2-James M. feathers. Judge.
Oliver NJ Henry VS.. William H. Harris;
damages. Jury out.
Jesse Cobler vs. Frank Bird Transfer
| plaintiff for costs.
Room 3-Vinson Carter, Judge
Isaac L. George VS.. d. J. Mendenhall ct
al; appeal Finding and judgment against
defendant for $22.4 5 and costs
Laura p Fl. Sickels VS. Flora A. Cooper
ct al; foreclosure. Finding due $l.264.2O and
; costs.
Emma Bradley VS.. Anthony T. Bradley ct
| al; support. Discharged at cost of defend
/ ants.
Circuit Court.
| Henry Clay Allen, Judge.
Lucy Tunstall VS.. Mary Dean; SANDER.
DISMISSED by plaintiff. Judgment against
Samantha c. Perigo VS.. Smith w. Perigo;
divorce. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
Judgment against PLAINTIFF for costs.
ton vs.. Board of County Commissioners of
| Marion County: appeal from board. Sub
mission of Nov. z. 1889, set aside Cause re-
| submitted to court. Evidence heard Taken
under advisement
International Building and Loan Associa-
ton No. 2 vs. Board of County Commission
Submitted to court. Evidence heard. Taken
unCer Amusement.
Estela Hughes VS.. John T. Craig: Islander.
| Plaintiff called. Defaulted. Cause dismissed
/ for want Of prosecution. Judgment against
plaintiff for costs.
sevtull T. Snyder VS.; Calvin ]. Fletcher;
on account. Submitted to court. Evidence
New Suits Filed,
Henry c. Jordan vs.. The Indianapolis
Wood Ornament and Refrigerator Compa-
ny; suit for receiver. Circuit Court.
vorce. Circuit Court.
Barnhart Brothers & Spindler VS. James
o GTthrie; pS %ed Superior Court Room 8
dianapolis Light and Power Company Ell
| al; damages. Superior Court Room 8.
Albert Vann. by his next friend. vs.
perior Court, Room l.
| Alice Bridge vs.. The Indianapolis Street
railway Company; damages. Circuit Court