The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1899-03-28

aries of the Nipper lode claim. 1t is al
legged that the claim of the defendants
casts a cloud upon the rights of tbs
plaintiffs. and particularly to such por-
tons of the vein as lie beyond the
south side line of the Nipper. Such
claim Of the defendants. is is alleged
is wholly without foundation in law CT
equity. The right or title of the plain
| tiff herein set forth cannot be adequate
ly quoted or protected at law by one or
two actions. but numerous will follcT
one upon another the parties here
| to involving the rights of the
| plaintiffs in and 20 the above portions
| of the Nippcr vein. and irrespective Of
the determination of one or two suits
at law upon the subject of this action.
even though the plaintiffs should be
successful. 1t would and will still be
claimed that the physical conditions
and facts vary between vertical planes
| drawn through the end lines of the
| Nipper lode claim. and the determina-
| ton of such suits at law will not and
| cannot be conclusive. 1t is alleged that
the defendants threaten to mine and
extract ore from that portion Of the
vein in dispute and that If permitted
to do SO. the plaintiff will have no
means of determining the value of the
ore so taken and it will be wholly lost
to the plaintiffs. For that reason a
temporary restraining order is asked
for pending the final determination CT
the suit, and that at the final hearing
it be decreed that she defendants have
no right or title to that portion of the
vein referred to in the complaint.
In the divorce suit of Sarah A. Pace
against Walter G. Pace the defendant
yesterday filed an answer and cross bill.
He admits their marriage at West
Bromwich. England, on April Is, 1883,
but he denies that he told his wife,
when she was sick that he wished she
would die. He says that on October Is.
1897, while she was in a state of intox-
ication he told her that If she could
not keep sober he wished she would
die. At another time while she was
drunk he pleaded with her to refrain
from the use of intoxicants, and while
angered at she condition in which she
was in. he slapped her with his cpen
hand. He says that is the only cruelty
he has ever shown her and she forgave
him for that and lived with him as his
wife after that. Pace also denies that
his wife is in INDECENT circumstances
and alleges that for four years she has
had full charge and control Of all his
earnings and he believes she has money
on deposit in one of the banks. In his
cross bill Pace accuses his wife of habit
ual drunkenness during a period of four
years and asks for a divorce on that
ground.
In suit of Charles Thorn and others
against the Butte. Anaconda & Pacific
for money claimed to be due fer grad
ing a piece Of wagon road on the hill,
an answer was yesterday filed by the
defendant. The latter claims that a
contract was entered into with Karl
man & Jennings to do the work and
that firm was. on rendering an account
therefor, paid in full.
Jessie Maher yesterday brought a
suit against William Mahcr fer divorce
on the ground of deserton and non
support. They We're married in Butte
on December /, 1897. and the plaintiff
has been deserted for more than year
She asks for a decree Of divorce and
the custody of their child a girl about
one year old.
A written demand was served yester-
day on the plaintiff and her attorneys
in the divorce case of MonoCa Callahan
against Emmett Callahan that they re-
turn to the defendant $500 paid checks
and the stub-books on Hoge, Brownee