The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1899-04-29

at issue. Attorneys: John T. Casey,
plaintiff; E. Scharnikow, defendants.
w. N. Stringham VS.. w. w. Hyslop;
appeal. Attorneys: G. B. Winston, de-
PENDANT.
D. c. Mcdonald VS.. w NJ. Leask ct
al; at issue. Attorneys: Sawyer &
Walsh, plaintiff; George B. winston,
defendants.
Aug. Roston vs. Robert Thompson;
at issue. Attorneys: w. H. Trippet,
plaintiff; Rodgers & Rodgers and ]. M.
Simpson, defendant.
p. s. fancy VS.. Mary Vollenmeidar;
at issue. Attorneys: ]. W. James. plain
tiff: J. H. Duffy, defendant.
w. ]. Petritz VS.. George Tasock; APP
peal. Attorneys: J. M. Self. plaintiff;
j. H. Duffy, defendant.
A. Hensgen VS.. H. Morse ct ux.; on
demurrer. Attorneys: Rodgers &
Rodgers and J. M. Simpson, plaintiff;
j. H. Duffy, defendants.
City of Anaconda VS.. Thomas Mena-
han; appeal. Attorneys: r. O'Leary
plaintiff; J. H. Duffy, defendant.
Mary Tessimond VS. Charles w
Smith; at issue. Attorneys: j. H Duffy,
plaintiff; M. J. Cavanaugh, defendant
MacCallum & Cloutier VS.. Nels c.
Johnson: at issue. Attorneys: j. r.
Boarman, plaintiffs; j. w. James, de-
PENDANT.
J. A. Dunlap VS.. D. B. Birran; at is
sue. Attorneys: H. r. Whitehill, plain
tiff: j. w. James, defendant.
City. of Anaconda VS.. Austin Sloan
appeal. Attorneys: T. o'Leary, plain
tiff j. H. Duffy, defendant.
P. S. fancy VS.. Margaret Morse ct
al. on demurrer. Attorneys: Walsh &
James, plaintiff; j. M. Simpson and
Rodgers & Rodgers, defendants.
e. J. McGivern VS.. Joseph w. Vein;
| ,Dr1
plaintiff; c. M. Sawyer, defendant.
Max Epstein ct al. VS.. Ella Elphison:
appeal. Attorneys: J. NJ Self, plain
| tiffs: Duffy & Casey. defendant
city of Anaconda VS.. Ethel Lynn: ap-
peal Attorneys: T. O'Leary, plaintiff;
Sawyer & Walsh. defendant
A. c. M. Co. VS.. D. B. Birran; at is
sue. Attorneys: H. r. Whitehill, plain
tiff: j. w. James, defendant.
MacCallum & .Cloutier VS.. Pat D..
Daley ct TX: at issue. Attorneys: Saw
yer & Walsh, plaintiff; H. r. Whitehill,
defendants.
Walker & Gibbs VS.. Pat D. Daley ct
Tx; at issue. Attorneys: G. B. Win
ston, plaintiff; H. r. Whitehill, defend
ants.
e. B. White VS.. James V. Collins: at
issue. Attorneys: J. M. Simpson and
Rodgers & Rodgers, plaintiff; J. H.
Duffy defendant.
John A. Sheldon VS.. John ]. Walsh
ct al; demurrer Attorneys: George B.
Winston, plaintiff; j. H. Duffy, defend
ants.
f. B. White VS.. Division No. 1, A. O.
Fl. of Anaconda ct al: demurrer. At
torneys: G. B. Winston and Rodgers &
Rodgers, plaintiff: OLearys& Maiden,
defendants
Joseph Willard ct al. vs. Michael Sulli-
van; demurrer. Attorneys: Toole. Bach
and OLeary, plaintiffs; T. J. Walsh,
defendant.
Frank Hahn vs. J. w. James ct al. :;
demurrer. Attorneys: H. F. Napton,
plaintiff; J. w. James, defendants.
John Conley VS.. board Of county COM
missioners of Deer Lodge county. At
torneys; w. Fl. Trippet, plaintiff; j. H.
Duffy, defendant ,5as ;s4,s
James Gillespie VS.. Joseph cannon;
appeal Attorney: James M. Self, de-
PENDANT.
Mary Crosswhite ct al. VS.. Mary Jor-
censor ct al; demurrer. Attorneys:
H. P. Napton and j. r. Boarman plain
tiffs; G. B. Winston, defendants,
S. E. Larabie vs. Mammoth Gold
Mining Co. ct all; demurrer. Attor-
| neys: Ed Scharnikow, plaintiff; j. NJ
Simpson, defendants.
| D. D. Twohy VS.. Oliver Lesser, as
| mayor of the city of Anaconda ct al.
demurrer. Attorneys: r. OLeary,
| plaintiff: Walsh & James, defendants.
H. j. B. Proulx ct al VS.. Joseph Pc
| tiers and Frances E. Peters. Attorneys:
J. M. Simpson and G. B. Winston, plain
tiffs; Duffy & Casey, defendants.
William Denzler, ST. vs. Michael
| Lane.
In re contested will of Hugh Whit
| craft. deceased. Attorneys: G.. B. Win
| ston, plaintiffs; E. Scharnikow. de-
PENDANTS.