Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1899-06-05

WANT HNAbbNs NIppUT aEN
As to the true situation at u,ffa.a
H"WlI ma Go suggest. that ~. IH.
county uillpprs are not doalrout bow.
HH sIIONuH there. ana are win. tn
urTvsf them " they can ~, III a.0.
fN evidence, The extract. VI .H 500
.UU.NsUN. from tho report OF fn Dol Do.
.u..Uf Walter ~ 0rhVta. Il n, .H.a.d
.HHH."rIuNu. either written viz. I".
..IHINI" ignorance 90 the facts HIU
educational UI r.rtlcHg ular sHHI ri
truth. Doc was clearly more lntt uI
..U.IIINuHI rNuutt fuHu un ..I.
mH. no utts am free d IuIa
however thlt ihe sale ui U4ugI II..
... H doubtless % MOI
.UH. dl.eiu.iuc, and th
NJ tnH Indians on thr HIs
Walton. haiiovo az, IH.
UIHu agents have made
UuH. UN.II Goo uut u stop to Uit. s..
liquor Zoo thn Indians, aud / ink l.0F.
uU. Dob uuIIuE mY tuhuIaHmtu. ID On
.aU efforts nf AGENT Myfr. Ia.
300. MyIu lH HiItiuucd f1ufta M
Wm iho place. ana I would
HIUIIN thN'rt him Co. htt,
command Uf thU army nnloaif h
detection % che illegal sale u. HIl
IuI IIs .eWiur uf evidence
IHu Etur. Dr. much more % HHH.
f.. IH iHH Federal government Hlu Do
# Il no.. state. % Dr. Huuuuffft 4. fH.
.IIN..I. IHui perhaps 90 rnfi 10 .E.
ult Uy IIIlual, % IN within m"
UI fn. military rUHU fNutlun. ana .f I.|HI
twenty mUH fum any Settler mo
fH. .Ifa.U. VI Utah. Aithlush Dol boz
particular monaco 90 The lhW HIHE
,.tI1.n. 70 lt"h ln,i1E frouueai
uF .NIIINUH. gamblers. whlHl IHI
U.H HHI women Uf 900 rruH HuI
perhaps induul % iH H.aI
N Within thu Jurisdiction VI thr state.
uuu uH HrH ready willing and nH. 10
fnIuIl. tH Uuf re- stop tu u, but I. Hl.
.rttHUU Hf such place Dol made .lH."
only W tnn PATRONAGE of the I.H
stationed uf Fort uurhrHnn thn
Ir command ihorc cnn force over Hil.
NdWI un ih" strip Wiihl 5000
months uu account or lack ur pliHn.H.
30 he will Keep the soldiers nvuI rum
thrfr uf If ha cannot Keep them IUaE
boz could with little trouble and m Ut.
pUna.. furnish The local nufi taa
With evidence nf The fnio OF lluu IHf
thus enable uH Co stop the sale I'd Iluf
Ht u reasonable expense. other Z. 90
would u.rHHTIfHfU % Nrry long d ! Hr.
reuaItH Cuirid against the tran -lnt
fu hlt rurpuHH' tlrnVinH Tor rlrH.i.f.
alton hereafter che report or inrh lu.
Hpcgf1r NfuY"al 60 mo- other tHu.Hr
tNHu tu reduce hV one the t.rHrI
place. where Indians and soldier Oiu
g.t liqu0r
inda,tllos OF the law are COZ nI.
uul WOw ur lrHn. with the 70
NluHU uu1 ! nm frank ln anY I'M iha
HffIu' Dr. rn exception. but aH hH. ..
fhr commanding officers ne TnH bod.
ohraur remain Indifferent in thf mat.
iUr lH"' That ihHIl attitude b. .Hf
equivalent t1 spreading tho WI. af
protection over them. lunHmuch d tHHF
could Hn olHliY prevent them fnl o.
curing thH patronage uf the noldIfH uHs
der thrlf command. without which ilri
could uUi rxlHt. ur not desiring u iI
that could furnish uH with tho on iHrHH
which would hn necessary 90 rHtl.f
them continuously " Illegal HoiiinT uu.
til 10 would Boz rrrrontahlc.
WANT OFFICERS TO co-opEIArE
90 view of tho situation 1 ahlf 10
tho army officers win not cnsu1u rate
with mr. Wmrnd 90 the huUH 10
county commissioners that license Ialr
io applicants thereof. and thai ifH
laws % Utah. applying 20 the COZ luoi.
lur N saloons o. enforced uH rlFiIT HI
possible And ! assure you that o. o..
cal authorities are fully cnmpcifHi tD
enforce tho state laws. n the saloon
keepers are licensed and put up a. r0-
quIfrd bonds t1 nay an lines an fore
foiturcs adiudFrd against them. y owe
ever. I would prefer that the inlln
department Hrrure the cooperate "
Tho army officials in the matter Hrl
do away with o. entirely A. T. tha
Federal government Interpreting hrrH
IN NOT ths slightest ierni rroundi inT
tho commission 0f such AN act
Before concluding this already 81
tended communication, ! wlnh o. fa.'i
lralu 90 the rHpuri NJ indian lnnf in'
of murders have been committee Do
Those places since thlH strip VIZ
apart" uNirrut inquiry anon 1f
residents. Including every nhohn hh.
h1a served since that time. disclose ih.
fHrt fhHt fnU SCORE NJ murders rui rs
tl. WrrH committed upon the porr0tH OF
thr0o tFamnlorl only, the iustl' U
tbH uUncr who heard tho prcllni ar
examination uf thH man who killed Hn
of them u UH'nrHl mani inform ma
hHt coo evidence lu thc case c'Hlr|
indicated that that huinE was a0.I
lUufll Zoo thUrH could nHN
boon hut two that tHuI
hy amy construction io termed muf o.
Hui Hu unr 1f them thc jury 81 ingaH
nUlut NtF Hri. 1881. brought Do
verdict Hf IuHInnbir homicide A d
ihe hHlf "a lnrun ur moro Indians Wlr
iHfrl ui Those places ur after thfy hA|
lrft Thorn erased with liquor thVy hl
cotton thHrH" I can learn % hut in
who were thought Go have died thrnlE
lhH Indirect influence M tho nnlnI1'
having fIHEHu Co. death on their way
home. THE inspector may have h."
mlslufurWHl uH tu those matters, hn
hH HHNH further speaking from Nhl
ruI1ri. 90 hn Dig own knowl, BOZ.