The Mankato free press. [volume] (Mankato, Blue Earth County, Minn.) 1879-1924, 1899-11-03
DISTRICT COURT.
Calendar for the Term Begin
ming Next Week.
Two Criminal and One Hundred and Six
Civil Cases, Besides Grand Jury
Busint So.

| The district court convenes next
Tuesday. and Clerk of Court Thorne is
busy preparing the calendar The lat
ter will contain two criminal and 100
civil cases. and the grand jury will no
doubt add several cases to the criminal
calendar.
The two criminal cases are that
against Anton Oiemel and that against
VIM Kehoe, Cade, Keith, Erastus Wad-
dell and Carl Hopkins
Sixty-two cases come over from the
old calendar The divorce industry has
placed dozen new cases on the calen-
dar. In all, there are A new cases, as
follows:
So. Fl James VS. the Chicago, Mil
waukee & ST. Paul Ry
GA. In the matter of the estate of
the last will and testament of Philip
Guthier. deceased, Katie Jones, applt,
VS. Chas Jones, respt.
! IS. Henrietta E Foster and Mary E
Soule, applts, VS. Henry w Brown as
adm of estate of Flora E. McMurtrie.
respt.
&c. Frank Jones VS. VIM Lang
81. Citizens bank of Mortified VS.
Chas A Swanson.
SO. E G Herring VS. Geo Seecrest.
So. AIDA Smith VS. Peter F Smith.
70. Joseph Van Berg VS. Katharine
Van Berg.
II. Andrew o Stenherg VS. Clark M
Reynolds, Ole Johnson, Eugene Bur
| nett and lanes r Merrell
| O72. Charles E Brown VS. r M Brown
ct al by Amelia Nelson, guardian ad
Item.
l73. Mary Jameson VS. John jamie
son.
"a. In the matter of the guardian
ship of Frank HAITI, an incompetent
person, John HAITI, applt, VS. Barbara
Deubler, respt, and Ferdinand Waller
as guardian of Frank HAITI.
/ 70. Benedict Bangerter Sr avs the
Winona & ST Peter railway company.
76. Zelma May Morrow VS. VIM E
Morrow
". Van Brunt & Wilkins Mfg Co VS.
Fl Froelich and G W Froelich.
| rs. G Laurisch respt, VS. Thos
Carey, applt.
! 49, John johnson VS. Betsey John
son.
80. Emma Foley VS. VIM Fl Foley.
| 81. Mabel Reed VS. Chauncey Reed,
49, Lille Herring VS. Ernest c
Herring.
SO. Lulu Goodwin VS. the city OF
Mankato.
! "a Victor E jacobson ct al, applts,
VS. the Mankato & New Ulm railway
company.
SO. L B Lindsey VS. butcher & Hol.
ton.
So. Mary E Soule and Henrietta E
Foster VS. Addison FL Dobbin.
81. James Cogan and Bernard Co
gan, copartners as P Cogan & Son VS.
Thos Hart.
sS. Lockwood S Close VS. Mary 3
iClose.
: 80 Laura A Tinkcom VS. James r
Tinkcom, Olof G Lundberg and Mary
L Lundberg.
80. Henry Heinzeman vs the Winona
& st Peter railway company.
81. Tillie Wenner VS. Peter Wenner
90. E G Best & Co VS. M A Sherk &
Son.
90. Herman FL Born Francis Born.
"a. N E Fuller, applt, VS. the board
of county commissioners of Blue Earth
county. respt.
80 Helena Welgelt VS. Ferdinand
Weigelt.
SO. John Schmidt VS. city of Man
kato.
81. Matte Paddock VS. Harry Pad
dock.
49, Mary c. Martenson VS. Augustu
w Johnson ct al.
go Eliza Jacoby VS. the grand coun
Gil of the Northwestern Legion O
Honor
100. DC Kretzer VS. the Chicago
Milwaukee & st Paul railway com
pany.
1O1. Robert o Craig VS. the city o
Mankato.
102. Frederick Marsh VS. Ira Ward
103. In the matter of the estate O
Martin Stanken and of the appeal o
julius Krause therein.
104. Herman 81 Born VS. Xavie
Heider and Francis Born.
105. VIM G Thomas VS. Jacob G Hub
106. Mccormick Harvesting Ma
chine Co VS. A B Chapman.