The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1899-03-23

WHell InoH accept Jne responsibility
OF office they should discharge their
duties, and the people should provide
the means. | do not know what the
condition of the Jail is now, but do
know that in September last the
Court, Chief Judge Boyd and myself,
inspected the Jail and found it in
very bad condition, and if the trouble
has not been remedied the commits
sioners should be indicted and remov-
ed from office and persons substituted
who would perform their duties.''
Two young men, Frank Mosser and
Winfield Mosser, were brought before
the court on an attachment for refus-
ing to obey summons to appear be-
fore the grand jury. Judge Sloan,
afteF an inquifs it,te the 1natters.said
he would make an example or them,
and sent them to Jail for ten days.
The original docket, which contains
43 cases, was then called and appear
ances entered. These cases will come
on for trial at the September term.
APPEAL DOCKET.
No. 1, Leroy Guthrie VS. r. A. Or
cutt; continued; Peddicord-Sincell.
2, L. &. Ford VS. j. A. Runners; tried
before the court Judgment reversed
and judgment for plaintiff for S52.4O;
Gonder and Renninger-Thayer.
3, T. A. Nethkin VS. j. Shartzer, re-
ceiver; witness sick and case contin-
ued; Hamill-Peddicord
4, d. E. Offutt VS. Mayor and Coun-
Gil of Oakland; continued; Hamill-
Peddicord.
8, G. S. Hamill VS. Mayor and Coun-
Gil of Oakland; continued; Hamill-
Peddicord.
6, Hanson B. Lewis VS. John Shart-
zer; tried before the court and judg-
ment in favor of Shartzer affirmed:
Daily-Peddicord.
7, George w. Shartzer VS. John
Shartzer; replevin; tried before the
court; judgment reversed without
prejudice, each party to pay his own
costs in Circuit Court; Hamill and
Semmes-Peddicord
8, George w. Shartzer VS. John
Shartzer; replevin: tried before the
court; judgment affirmed Hamill and
Semmes-Peddicord.
8, Geo. w. Shartzer VS. John Shart-
zer; damages; tried before the court
and judgment reversed without pref
udice, each party to pay his own costs
in the Circuit Court; Hamill and
Semmes-Peddicord.
10, E. E. Burley VS. John ShartZer;
tried before the court and Judgment
reversed; Peddicord-Sincell.
II, George W. Shartzer VS. John
Shartzer; tried before the court, judg-
ment reversed and Judgment for
John Shartzer for $500; each party to
pay his own costs in the circuit court;
Hamill and Semmes-Peddicord
12, George w. Shartzer VS. John
Shartzer; appeal dismissed HamiIl
and Semmes-Peddicord
13, George W. Shartzer VS. John
Shartzer; jury trial, jury out; Hamill
and Semmes-Peddicord.
TRIAL DOCKET.
No. 1, B. N. Lusson VS. J. D. Bren-
neman; ejectment; continued; Ped
dicord-Hamill.
2, Bessie N. Lusson VS. Urias Lichty;
ejectment; continued; Peddicord-
Hamill.
B, M. G. Merryman ct al VS. Cum
berland Paper Co.; cantinued; Hamill
Wilson and Sincell.
4, G. G. Strickland VS. S. W. Green;
eJectment; judgment for plaintiff;
Mitchell-Peddicord and Sloan.
5, Jasper Augustine VS. Jos. w
Wolfe and wife; continued; Hamill-
Mitchell.
6, Jasper Augustine VS. Jos. w.
Wolfe and wife; continued; Hamill-
Mitchell.
Z, j. T. Osborn VS. E. Livengood;
ejectment; June 12; Sincell and Thay-
er-Mitchell and Semmes.
8, Henry Weber VS. William Brod-
erick ct al; ejectment; June 12;; Thay-
er and Hamill- Mitchell and Semmes.
8, l.. Warwick VS. j. G. Anderson:
continued; Hamill-Peddicord
10, Leonard Schell VS. H. Beckman;
dismissed; Peddicord-Thayer.
II, Titus Delawder VS. Alexander
Lower; June 12; eddicord-Thayer.
12, w. w. Rulifson VS. w. A. Liller;
continued by agreement; Peddicord
Morrison.
13, State, use Mayor and Council of
Oakland, VS. A. G. Mason and others;
continued; Hamill-Peddicord
IA, b. E. Weimer VS. Chas. Michaels;
trial; Peddicord-Hamill & Semmes.
10, j. E. Miller VS. David Martin;
continued Henderson.
Is, r. M. Sutton g. Co. VS. J. r.
Browning, garnishee; June 12; Ham
ill-Sincell.
II, r. NJ. Sutton & Co. VS. A. S. Sell,
garnishee; June u; Hamill-Sincell.