The sun., 1899-12-16


,he eorre.popdenee between y,.., Mr NJ EHy and Mr. Mr.
duced the corrrspon dence itself Alter he hsc
the two letters he made no use oi them fo
Ss sTsS sS Gsd @ Mn t knssy S SSt
Rtofney M SSiSu had smpIoyod en- & Mf KiNsley said St
o. Did you collect the fees Of any other er
perts than yourself es tred ed. 20 CHlse Sdn
do It. and the money was sent to him direct
EXPERTS DrvvY UP.
At this point Mr.. Weeks brought out mos
and Mr. kinsleyi diyIde up The eIper. hand.
and NJ; Klpssy ,esr,ory; and neither en-
sSs yS% Or Of hsa any you qsy "''5s' asked
sca.Ss SSys ssi hi & Tss. Sd.s.s. sa M aEs K a
and he went to California. Now. when he
comes into my territory. he DIVIDES his fees
divide my my fees with him. ' ' '',
30. In addition to what you get personally
hmes,s compensation. too. do your" asked
THAT Is my understanding Of It," said Mr..
..hav. YOU any other ,srrapgement with any
Other elperts?"@ @ asked NJ Weeks.
Mr. Weeks q then brought out the facts about
bad ss,hsrsd tosehef tSe Grask msn ssectsd SSs Ss
Nr RInssY ,r 70 oaek cav ap MS % %opinL3nt n t Mr.;
hsm a 'Ti They HESsn s"me Sr 'efp Of
the photographs. He said that they had no
Alter he had fini.hsd H with that, Mr.. Weeks
asked him about the condition OF the experts
Der OF exhibits he had seen, and, bringing out
the iact that there we're many. he sail: And
! fifteen n n
amans handwriting such as you admit you
sHd sGuld not come GO 70 decision
ssyes as he, replied. Not when mans life
The reply was an unexpected ono.
Would they give you sufficient opinion to
testify t yhSrS only wa map,s liberty depended
In determining these things" said Mr..
Kinsley, "A man will be gu !ded to an extent by
the suoleot az issue; a good deal depends on
Mr.: Week hsd referred e had bcsn entirely
Now he asked: NJ Ripsay s Is i pP poss Die tESi
Sa"dwTtl"s to.day bseomss s,S2, chSfacterstls a
of somethne entirely different month
No" said Mr.. Kinsley. II don't think So"
You have never, done that in this case. have
YONG asked s,id Mr Mr Kinstsv Neeks .r,.v.r,.
q. You. have, never stated that certain
pecu!iarities in handwriting in this case indi.
at another time? 4. No. / have never se 40
stated SO far as recoect.
y: Did YOU ever s,ntc that the separation Of
certain letters in the address on the poson
package was a method OF dsguise1 A. can't
remember whether did or not
Osborne was on hs feet shouting out an OBJ
Ject on which the Recorder allowed.
case that he separation Of letters was par, Of
alisguiseF A. don't recolect anything otthe
-" Now, Mr.. EInsey.", said Mr.. Weeks. "in
the words Of the District Attorney, please be
fair. i ask you II you have not stated that
pnrI OF the disguise adopted by the man who
sent this poison package"
thing Of tho Kind. and looked somewhat
49,, 81 Pa y9gp net authorize an interview to be
,hs POISON passags ana state! thu, ths .epafa::
y cannot remsmbsr." sai Mr. Kinsley,
maDded M Wssi as u he ss Rad om ss
paper Clipping the statement.
eann9i remember whether l said It or
.. Did you ever have that opinion In your
mlndt A. can't say.
THEoRIzrYo THEN.
=. Do you say that you never had such an
IN the addressP 4. may have done M tae so' 'G was
theorizng at that time; was reaching around
ll.
Mr. Weeks went on aEj drew from the wit
ness that he had ,ha the defendants hand
writing since Jan. l, that ho had examined IL
with the utmost care. ami then brought ont
effectively from him the aim ission that he had
testified that the, separation of tho letters Il"
and &C" in the address on tho poison package
was one OF the characierl-tics that had in-
nue1csd hin, ~ reaching the copclusion that
the defendant had written the address.
ms i!ns s6 81 sT"WWnaon wen 3n for some
III" sidetraciing of Mr, Moiinsnx as" as a aT cnndi.
date for the accusation. He asked II II was
not fact that, when Mr. Kins!ey had side-
tracked Molin-uN. lie had rrarhe the conclu-
sion that the al ress on the poison pac. age
Was va pr IN the handwrit,ng Of the defendant.
concuson either way.
6a mai You % no, Il rsrGr'el % 20 the contTeryI
not been able to satisfy myse that il was the
h9niwriting OF the defendant. reported that
had touud som" characteristics in the hand
writing. but not enough To satisfy me
Ha Int you 'ouni Just as many character
istino ,, in other hap1wrytns. thai you hal ex.
nm an, \. l hhd found some characteristics
NIX, Mr. WSc3.s 60, hack to the Hay letter.
lection 10 h4virg il read. MIR. Klnslry replied
,hht y" had 10 Objection 50 long "a the en-
his S rc sIyf cak * "sI"SS Sa hat ~n
ncll what h. wanted. and 'he TWO l''t"rs were
rea !. :, Nr Hay .e':"r rent ID ioan ntrrvi"w
HNh II rs ley Irint"i IN an "vcuing nrwspnp"r
l. lIiletct !om X ms cy's coucl,i ,ons that the
ni&n%T,ns han w SSss WIN @G, VIZ aPS H1sd
ley To THIS letter was as follows
EISsLEY's LETTER
Mr., T. y. Hay. Washington. Il. O.:
My Dear Mr. lay Your favor Of the 4th
inst ~ hand and noted. lam very glad indeed
to hear IRON YOU.
Tn" little saub TINT you saw IN tho evening
eAlilrn oi III" JJWhll Dn leh. 3. and which yuu
ca. ed httc note, was a litle interview had
win IN" by reporter oi tho Journal in tbs
mornin:.
The Irst edition OF the Journal did not bnv,
your report In 1t. and while read the Jo,yu1l
coming ih from Elizabeth or the train | aid
j hnd purchased
when rrnchch my ofllce found journal
rrl oft"r hNd,ting NJ" with a copy of the second
edi ION containing YOU r port | read IL over
la ", hu' one oi the g.iIilp in the otllrn
chl"d my att htlon To- the tact that the small
~ was not as smal as YOU had s,nt.J
owing TO my hasty reading ot 1t agreed with
him, "''
! told the Journal reporter that did not care
10 he intsrv!ewed about the matter and mar.
licu nr di M. wish to crltclse brother ex-
Lerts work.
| did tell him that thought II was n mistake.
hbd think 40 sIill-an II terrible mi STAKE
100. ~ matter ot this kin ana especiully
wien human life is N BtRk"--iOr nm expert TO
give an opinion, and, Hs you have to give n
positive op, hion reiterated fr m day TO ,Iny on
specimens meagre in quantity and photo.
nngraNei ana poorly printed in the dully uauera