The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1899-06-13

AMI privilege over ' si'e property woucr. making thu
statement above qu",c adds .Aud common law the arl-
"t~p 81" female wsr terminated rc-J-et her estate
''. .H her 'n"rr'as" ." an adult hr''IHs ~ ritz pniy
- rested ." "r 'Hdr h' Hrol 81 her Lr,sI"- H. T. $50
Nud Sc"uior. n like remarks but 90, .at. ,,
rule. n view "t late married w.r' aiu'r clear
T.. I@5.
Nlarrs, %. ial, ssrl ur,r guardianship a. -Iulrlr
'- net 80 l'-'ii operate termination "f hc relationship
Guardian Sr Warl. operate legal discharge fl. rr,arl-
'i "ui - the >'Jtu" provide. H. made aT,ssr Ia
proper application To- the judy, Ell" probate. that such sariau-
The wand also in support 81" her Petition urged that s ar
now exists for such guardianship AMI that -hc -lni
thrift, and that shc well her husband p,rfcsly ,
pctcnt {" AMI control her prorrv anI further that
at the time 1T the appointment IL guardian her I Ir
estate >lufr ground then existed ~. evidence
''n l',"i, !" Gv" the pr"bat" judge juri~ic'i"u- ~
or" stated full hearing. had tl .1.hrift ,l, NJ.
Present AMI was ao represented ty counsel AMI tc
!"isC !" probate hai full jurisdiction: evidence then
"ui hc reported evidence : The adjudication KaIna
a. >TcndhTift y 81 competent jurisdiction after
nearing AMI It J. not now open hc petitioner ~
opening and review 1T the proceedings AMI cvicu. thu
petition for the Guardianship
haua having hcn aIjuigy, a >I-n,hrift AMI guardianship,
ordered the question ar whether -hc has ceased e. ~ @
thrift and i the evidence produced such a. t.. warrant
circr Judge in probate In ,cclarin, .,,, .,cl
u" longer Necessary. ~ &" this the probate Judge saw
III : not for review the evidence upon wh ilc cur1
' IL or'h Order pas upon 1t. >ucicncy other
WIS., must and IL" that Wa .asic, imam ,l
evidence before that khlua kapukni ut that tim. .
Thrift within the meaning ii the law. AMI Wa IN f
ch lepdrii' The presumption = that the
Guardianship c"ntinuc until the contrary shown an ,c lnr
"n OF proving that there i continuation
hl- hggr1u
satisfy me that The guardianship necessary the
contrary shows that the ward addicted excessive drinking
anu gaming - believe. the sole that ha not Ev
~h 81 such drinking and gaming spent l-.ncI
H estate u 4" expose herself aud suffering ila, .
anu her property have been under the a guardian
tieF further that u this petition granted anil .l
gwen iui control 81 her property. she would IN T-roI
"t time wholly >I-md Hnd her r..srrs az her
'Nr'iVc drinking 8nd gaming. Thi- nav opinion ,,s,
RAJ considerations. fer tie Protection .- r.r-s-
that the cna--cS
so far the removal of Mr.. Mas,-,u guardian :. r,
Hi u" cause las been shown therefor from tn. evidence
AMI counsel for the ward ia III. concluding argument admitted
J." hc irue that Mr. Maipu management the wHrl. c.,.,
has been prudent and careful aul that Ian. kent c .x
tns ct the ward and 81 The maintenance the ppv Wei
within the income.
he petition {" terminate the guardianship over hc wan'.
property and to- remove the present guardian i denied
We agree with the conclusions arrived at bv the r, iu
III probate IL y true that kaua. ic war La. no had a. ,r
an annual allowance the income of estate warrants. %
an application tc the circuit judge probably ui in her
receiving much larger allowance for her SUPPORT and main
enhcc Than she has heretofore received The guardian a. IN
creased the estate hy investing part of the income n :, ~.
'huaed and thus turned it into principal hut how far ,b
application 81 income o increase ihc principal should carried
N guardian IN particular estate a question tina, Ia.
'rs"N within the control AMI supervision the probate n
VINO can direct and order larger les allowance u D. mad. g.
me ward according To- her nc AMI wishes and ia. eu
ion If the estate Wv '-
The appeal i dismissed.
humphreys t GeIr for petitioner.
""I'~" at S"i"'1" for the guardian. respondent