The Stark County Democrat. [volume] (Canton, Ohio) 1833-1912, 1899-09-29

Leave TO file petition by September ~,
1899.
Motz VS.. Pontius' Exr. Leave to an.
swer instanter
Bender, ct al vs Sites, ct al. John J.
Kelley made party with leave to an
swer instanter.
Shertzer e. Fry vs Michner, ct al.
Leave to file petition instanter
Girard VS. Murphy. Leave to file petit
tion instanter.
Herschi VS. Penna Co Leave to file
reply instanter.
Melhush VS. Mehuish's ass,g Leave
to file answer instanter
Schneider's Exr. VS. Urich, ct al. Peter
f. Frank has leave to file answer by
September 30, 1899
Jennings vs Jennings, ct al. Defend
ant Jesse Jennings has leave to- file an
swer instanter.
Melhuish VS. Weary, assignee etc.
Leave to file answer instanter.
McMilen VS. News-Democrat Pub
fishing Co Leave to answer by second
Saturday.
Arnold VS. Hartranft. Leave to- file
Fife VS. City of Canton. Leave to- an
swer instanter.
Fife VS. City of Canton. Leave to an
swer instanter.
son, guardian of Clyde Crisswell, made
party with leave to answer instanter.
A. M. McCarty, ESQ, appointed guar
dian ad litem for Clifford Crisswell, 20
minor, with leave to answer instanter.
Grouse vs Stripe, ct AL Motion sus-
tained; plaintiff has leave to file
amended petition by September 30, 1899.
Van Dorstan's Adm'x. VS. Hudson, ct
al. Leave to board Of education of Pike
township to answer instanter.
Casack VS. Cornes Iron e. Steel Co.
Leave to pleade by September 30, 1899.
Leave to plead by September 30, 1899.
ruled leave to answer by September
90, 1S99
Gaskell VS. Clark, ct al. Motion over
ruled leave to answer by September
30, 1892
Scott vs. Harsh, ct al. Motion sus-
tained as to costs, security for costs TO
be given on or before October 10, 1899.
Impanneling of the grand jury.
Dannemiller & Sons VS. Meyer, ct AL
In decree and to be left off.
Hammel VS. Hammel. Dismissed for
want of prosecution at costs of plaintiff
No record
Thomas VS. Merley Dismissed at costs
of defendant; no record
In revocation Of public alleys. Dis
missed by plaintiff and at his or it's
costs. No record
Reck VS. Reck Leave to defendant
to file answer and cross-petition install
ter. u
Wednesday, September goth
DruCkenDTOu VS. hull SeIlSu ~
plaintiff costs. No record.
Swallen VS. Betz. Settled at costs Of
plaintiff. No record.
Robinson VS. Robinson, ct al. Dis
missed by plaintiff at her costs. No re-
cord.
Pfouts Us Biechele. Demurrer to
second amended petition sustained;
leave to file third amended petition by
second Saturday.
Clerc VS. Clerc. Injunction modified.
Crow VS. Sprankle's administrator.
Motion partly sustained and partly
overruled. Leave to file amended petit
ton by October 2 1899.
In the matter Of the Evangelical
Emanues church, of Beach City. Trial
| to court; decree.
Sexauer VS. Sexauer Judgment on
| default and decree and order to sell.
Thursday, September 21st-
Bomberger VS. Bomberger, ct al. Dis
missed by paintiff and at her costs,
without prejudice to new action.
Greenwald VS. Greenwald. Dismissed
plaintiff.
Shaffer VS. Keller, ct al. Leave to
plaintiff to amend petition by interim
| ing.
| VanDostan's administratrix vs. HUI
| son. ct AL Motion sustained so far as
| TO allow the defendant board of educa-
tion to pay Hudson his portion of money
tied up in this proceeding and the board
may pay all other claims and liens on the
fund.
ROOM NO. 2, JUDGE TAYLOR.
Monday, September 18th
| The louisville Brewing CO., VS. Lam
| den, ct al. Leave to Laura Gibler to an
swer by September %. 1899.
Douds VS. Guest. Dismissed by plain
tiff and at his costs but without preju-
dice to new motion.
| Home Savings &, Loan Co., VS. Lucas
ct al. Settled and sosts paid, no record
bv agreement OF parties.
Thursday, September 2fst-
| Younginger's administrator VS. Die
lbold safe &, Lock Co. Bill of exceptions
lallowed, signed sealed and filed.