Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1898-11-09

enough have been received to indicate
q heavy falling on In the vote 10 the
state. while that In the cities was well
sustained. The consequence Ia fall
ing on In the Republican plurality IN
thc state from 2i2.000 to the uppr1xl-
mated figures given shove.
outside Greater New York the vote
for Van Wyck e about oIfy one-iifth
OF per cent above thnt OF Porter In
1896. There appears 10 be a loss Of
four Re publican congressman In the
Brooklyn district. the Second. Fourth.
fifth and sixth. ami Congressman
Quigg, who had a majority Of about
1900 at the election last year. has been
defeated by William Astpr Chanirr,
In the Albany district. the Twentieth
Glynn Democrat, has been elected to
succeed Southwck. Republican.
In add ton 20 she foregoing there are,
seemingly. Democratic gains In the
Eighth and Thirteenth districts. both
IN this city Daniel J. Riorian being
elected IN the one. and jefferson ".
Levy IN the other. This makes a total
Democratic gain OF seven congressmen.
New York. Nov. al u. m.-ilcvisad
figures on congressman show that Re-
preventative Bennett Rep) l. re-elect-
ed In the Fifth district, Brooklyn. and
that Representative Riggs tDem.j is o.,
fcatcd by Prcndergast.
The vote IN the Thlriy-sncond Dis
triri OIgunaio) IL very. close. with the
probability Of the election nf Ryan
tDemD in the place OF Mahnny HcpD
A Democrat, Livingstone. n reported
elected In the Nineteenth. az present
represented by Cochran utepD In the
sixteenth congressional district John Q.
| Underhlll (Dcm) was elected. succeed
/ ing W. l.. Ward utop1
In the municipality OF New York. the
old-time Democratic majority was APP
| proNmated. Van Wycks vuie bclnr
/ about 10000 greater than that ~ The
Republican candidate. This ~ er re-
suN waa helped In some measure by thl
result IN the Borough Of Brooklyn
/ kings county, which IN 1896 E1v'
Black ulep). n plurality of 2l.Gs2. bu,
/ today rave a Democratic plurality Of
about 1850. Brooklyn "a the home Of
/ Judge Van wyck but this fact does not
wholly explain tho practical reversal
Of plurnlities which. ~ IL possible. is at
/ srhutahie 10 The lukcWarmneas OF iho
/ friends ~ Jacob worth. who was Dc.
/ posed from the chairmanahip N th,
/ county committee a. consequence 81
l his opposition 10 the piauh for Senator
/ Plat; In the mayoral,y contest last
/ year
The returns from many counties ur
the state are incomplete ana lu some
cases are missing altogether The inii.
/ figures at hand. point 90 a Republican
I plurality In the counties above The li1r-
/ lem ~ about 100000 10 Onset which ~.
/ Democrats can produce only the s0O000
| plurality Of Greater New York.
Tho stldler vote WIN not De counted
until December iat hut IL ia not hkrly
/ that the ballots from the camps VII
mnteraiiy alter fhe results Thor
| would seem 90 be- the greater prnhl.
/ bility that thc majority Tor Roosevelt
| viii he Increased.
Little ta known a. 20 the votes FOR
state senators and assembly. The re-
/ puhnranH had In the last legislature q
| majority of q on Joint ballot, ana lead
I crH Of the party profess confidence ina
/ there viii be no material d.mnut'on Of
I that majority. \ Republican lrrisln'
/ turc viii mean the election N liepuh,
| Mean United s'niea senator In place Of
/ Senator Murphy.
! In this city there was no fulnllmen
/ % the predictions % trouhlc az IN
I rolls. on the Hirrta downtown ther'
were the usual election nIrht noises an,
| actions. Democrats Eond-naturedly ac
! ceptod che fact OF the defeat OF thci
state tickei. which was apparent frou
the returns displayed early 10 the even
| inE.