Eagle River review. [volume] (Eagle River, Wis.) 1890-1927, 1898-08-18

brought against said Was county,
by said Bosworth as nominal PLAIN
tit, Jan. 26, 1898. That said e.
+. Sanborn had due notice OF said
action as district attorney OF said
county, and well knew Of the frau-
dulent issuing Of said order, but
disregarding his duty as said attor-
ney Of said county, and being In
collision with the said +. b. Bos-
worth to defraud said county,
wholly neglected to defend slad
action and fraudulently permitted
Judgment to be entered by default
sgainst said county, Feb. Is,
1898, for two hundred dollars
damages and fifty-three dollars and
fifteen cents costs, and the said
plaintiff, F. E, Bosworth, as
plaintiffs are informed and believe,
now claims an interest in said judg-
ment and said order No. 1896 ,
but which interest, if any he has
is subject to all the equities and
rights existing between said defen-
dant, G. F. Sanborn the payee in
said order, and the said county,
and which the people and taxpay-
ers thereof have against said frau
dulent order No. 1886.
That the aforesaid order, 4O77 for
two hundred and eight dollars and
fifty cents, i'll which the said G. +.
Sanborn is payee, was passed by a
pretended assignment to one, "A.
w. Sanborn, brother of said payee
and an action. was brought against
said Villas County thereon by said
A. w. Sanborn as nominal plaintiff,
March Z, 1898. That said defen-
dant, G. f. Sanborn, had due notice
of said action as district attorney of
said county, and we'll knew of the
fraudulent issuing of said order, but
disregarding his duties as said attor-
ney Of said county and being in col
fusion with said A. w, Sanborn to
defraud said county, wholly neg
lected to defend said action and frau
dulently permitted judgment by de-
fault to be entered against said coun-
ty, March %, 1898 for two hundred
and elght dollars and fifty cents
damages and tifty-two dollars and
forty-hve cents costs and that after
wards on the same day said iudg-
;nen1 was 50 entered, said A. w.
Sani,orn at the instance of said de-
PENDANT Il. q. Sanborn and in his
behalf and interest assigned the said
Judgment to the defendant, The Old
National Bank OF Csmb:ige, Guern-
sey Co. Onio, which now claims an
interest in said Judgment and said
order No. 1917, but which interest
if any it has, is subject to all the
equities and rights existing between
said defendant G. + Sanborn the
payee in said order and which the
said county, and the people and tax
payers thereof have against said
fraudulent order No. 4O77.
That the aforesaid order No. 4274
in which the said 6. T. Sanborn is
payee was passed by pretended as
signment to one +. l.. Trimble and
with another order of like amount,
an action thereon was brought
against Villas county by said Trim
bic as nominal plaintiff, July "a,
1897, and judgment rendered by
default against said county August
IS, 1897 and August %, 1897, the
said Judgment. being for two hun
dred dollars damages and ifty-three
dollars and seventy-tive cents costs,
was assigned to the First National
Bank of Rhinelnnder Wis, and after
wards by said E:tnk on the alst day
o. January 1899, said judgment was
assigned to tao defendant G. F.
Sanborn who now appears to bs the
owner u the same. The said order
No. 4374 was nominally given for 9
pars of G. F. Sanborn's salary bat
without any authority Of law, and
was given before any salary was due,
Or in other words in advance. That
for reasons unknown to these plain
tits there was issued to said &. F.
sanborn without any authority of
law order No. 4O85 aforesaid for
four hundred dollars (salaryl Feb.
10th 1897, and afterwards without
any authority of law, in May 1897
there were issued the order No. 4274
for one hundred dollars and two
other orders for the same amount of
one hundred dollars each. In truth
and in fact there is nothing due said