St. Johnsbury Caledonian. [volume] (St. Johnsbury, Vt.) 1867-1919, 1898-04-13

penQeHCe Oh IeXdS. lie Sdlu. III dIi the
contests that have arisen out of the
revolution Of France, out Of the dis
putes relating to the crowns of Portugal
and Spain, out of the separation of the
American possessions of both from the
European governments, and out of the
numerous and constantly occurring
struggles for dominion in Spanish Amer
lea, SO wisely consistent with our just
principles has been the action of our
government, that we have, under the
most critical circumstances, avoided
all censure and encountered no other
evil than that produced by transient
estrangement of good will in those
against whom we have, by force of evil
dence. been compelled to decide.
1t has thus made known to the world
that the uniform policy and practice
of the United States Is to avoid all in
reference in disputes which merely le-
late to the internal government Of other
nations and eventually to recognize tn j..
authority Of the prevailing party, with
out reference to our particular interests
and views, or to the merits Of the orig
inal controversy.
But on this, as on every other trying
occasion, safety is to be found in rigid
adherence to principle.
"In the contest between Spain and the
revolted colonies, we stood aloof and
waited not only until the ability of the
new states to protect themselves was
fully established, but until the danger
of their being again subjugateI had en-
then. were they recognized Such was
our course in regard to Mexico herself.
ut is true that with regard to Texas
the civil authority of Mexico has been
expelled, it's invading army defeated, the
chief of the republic himself captured
and all present power to control the
newly organized government of Texas
annhilated within its confines. But, On
the other hand, there is. in appearance,
at least, an immense disparity of physi
cal force on the side of Texas. The Mexi-
can republic, under another executive,
Is rallying it's forces under new leader
and menacing a fresh invasion to re-
cover it's lost dominion.
upon the issue of this threatened in
vasion, the independence of Texas may
be considered as suspended and, were
their nothing peculiar in the relative
situation of the United States and Texas,
our acknowledgment of its independence
at such a crisis could scarcely be regard
ed as consistent with that prudent re-
serve with which we have hitherto held
questions"
Thereupon Andrew Jackson proceed
ed to consider the risk that there might
be imputed to the United States motives
of selfish interest, in view of the former
claim on our part to the territory of Tex
as, and of the avowed purpose of the
Texans in seeking recognition of indie
pendence as an incident to the incorpor-
alton of Texas in the Union, concluding
thus: prudence, therefore, seems to
dictate that we should still stand aloof
and maintain our present attitude If not
until Mexico itself, or one Of the great
foreign powers, shall recognize the in
dependence of the new government at
least until the lapse of time or the course
of events shall have proved beyond cavil
or dispute the ability of the people Of
that country to maintain their separate
sovereignty and to uphold the govern
ment constituted by them. Neither OF
the contending parties can justly COM
plain of this course. BY pursuing it we
are but carrying out the long established
policy of our government, policy which
has secured to us respect and influence
abroad and inspired confidence al
home"
These are the words Of the reso
lutte and patriotic Jackson. They are
evidence that the United States, in ad
dition to the test imposed by public Law
as the condition of the recognition of in
dependence by neutral state Ito wit
that the revolted state) constitute II
fact body polite, having government
in substance as we'll as in name, pos
sessed Of the elements of stability" ant
forming, de facto, "if left to itself,
state among nations, reasonably capabl
of discharging the duties of a state,
has imposed for its own governance IL
dealing with cases like these the furthe
condition that recognition of independ
ent statehood Is not due to a revolte
dependency until the danger of it's be
Ing again subjugated by the parent stat
has entirely passed away. This extrem
test was, in fact, applied in the state o