The San Francisco call., 1898-11-10

S. Wilson (D), D. E. Finley D.). J. Norton (D) J. W. Stokes (D).
 South Dakota-R. J. Gamble (R). C.. H. Burke (R.).
 R. Gibson (R.) J. A. Moon (D), c. A. Snodgrass (D), J. D. Richardson (D), J. w Gaines (D.). N, N. Cox (D), T. w. Sims (D.), R. A. Pierce (D.), D. w. Carmack (D.).
 Texas-T. H. Ball O), S. B. Cooper Dl R. c. de Graffenreid O), J. l.. Sheppard (D.), J. w. Bailey D.), R. E.. Lanham (D), A. s. Burleson O0, w. S Robeson (D), R. KIeberg (D.), J. L.. SIayden O.J, J. s. Stephens D).
 Utah-B. H. Roberts (D0.
 Vermont-H. M. Powers (R.), W. W. Grout (R.).
 Virginia-w. A. Jones (D), w. A Young O), J. Lamb D), s. P: Eppes D.), c. A. Swanson O), P. J. Otey (D), J. Hay (D.), J. F. Rixey (D.), w. F. Rhea D), J. M. Quarles D.).
 Wisconsin-H. A. Cooper (R0, J. E.. Jones (D), J. w. Babcock (R.). T. Ot- son (R.), J. J. Esch (Ro, E. s. Minor (R,), Alexander Stewart (R9. J. J. Jenkins (R.).
 Wyoming-F W. Mondell R).
 Arizona-Alexander Brodie (R.).
 New Mexico-R. B. Ferguson (D).
 CHARACTERIZATION (D,),
 The districts that are claimed as doubtful by either one or the other of the Congressional committees are the following:
 California-Barry versus Kahn; Wat CTS versus Barlow. Chairman Kerr claims the election of both Barry and Barlow.
 Illinois - Kern versus Rodenberg; Smith versus Garrett,
 Tn0iQna-H IyarsIJa Di1nna n Miers versus Gardiner: Paris versus Hamill; Cromer versus LetZ; Landis versus Cheadle: Brick versus Hatha- way; Bailey versus Overstreet. Farris and Overstreet are elected according to late telegram to Babcock.
 Iowa-Weaver versus Lacey.
 Kansas-Long versus Jerry Simpson.
 New York-Tomkins versus Robert son; Cochrane versus Livingston; Lit taer versus Lucey; Chickertng versus Strickland.
 North Carolina - Fowler versus Thomas; Caldwell versus Klutty.
 Washington-Lewis versus Cushman; Jones versus Jones.
 Kentucky-Boering versus I've.
 standardization versus Flynn; Fitzgerald versus Krebs; sprague yer suS Baker.
 Minnesota-Heatwole versus Hinds; Towne versus Morris.
 Missouri - Champ Clarke versus Shackelford.
 All four of the West Virginia districts may be classed as doubtful. Babcock claims them all and Kerr does not con- cede any of them.
 The Senate is safely Republican. The highest Republican estimate places the majority at eighteen over all other parties combined. It appears that the following States have either Republi- n that hndU h9Un elected Republican Legislatures: Cali fornia 2, Colorado. l, Connecticut 2. Delaware 1, Idaho l, Illinois 1, Indiana 2, Iowa ?, Kansas 1, Kentucky 1, Maine ?, Maryland 2, Massachusetts 2. Michi- gan 2, Minnesota 2. Montana 1. Nebras- New York 2, North Carolina 1. South Dakota 1, Vermont 2, West Virginia 2, Wisconsin 2, Wyo- ming 2; total 54. This does not include Senators Teller of Colorado. classed as Silver Republican. Senators Jones and Stewart of Nevada or Pettigrew of South Dakota, all of whom are natur- ally inclined to vote with the Repubh- cans on all matters other than the money question. This count gives the Democrats twentysix Senators, the Populists, Fusionists and Silver Re publicans ten, Republican majority over all of IS.
 The Senate will undoubtedly be reor- ganized iii the next Congress. If there should be an extra session of the Sen ate convened soon after March to consider the treaties now in process of negotiation the reorganization would take place at that time. General Cox. secretary, and Colonel Dick Bright, sergeant-at- arms, as well as all other Senate officers, will be succeeded by Republicans, and all the committee chairmanships will be filled by them,