Daily press. [volume] (Newport News, Va.) 1896-current, 1898-04-15
Board of School Trustees Holds I. I.nux Ga.
sion. Contract to be u IT urn-K Key.
Job at Cost of
IT,. ssai..23.

Peddicord u CO.. for erecting ,i,he~build-
ing was TIE lowest and ,n2,< firm was
awarded ., MI contract upop~the condition
that the funds We're L<alized upon une
sale of INK city binds
meyer d Sa--Svs1erd. OF this city were
a'ward@u the contract for i,uuting in
the heating system. This firms bid was
S4.3.s or 800 in excess of the loves.
II was local firm and the systems
were the same. the board decided, IL,
patronize home industry. as the righ,
bids
AS soon as President Cooper rlrped
the board to order Clerk W. e. Barrett
began TO break the seals and read t.h,.
bids. Each proposal Wa, accompanied
by certified! check for $500 as stipulated
in I!le aIXrrti s4e.aa4,ai
The BIDS for erecting the Du..r1,ng
We're follows:
Peddicord & Co. Newport News, slo,-
Si5.
G. G. Burton, Richmond, Va, sls.-
West Richardson. Newport News.
NJ. II. Minter, Newport News, s2l.-
ZIG.
S. B. Hutchins, Portsmouth Va, s2l,-
732.
G. T. Holtzclaw. Hampton, Va, s22,-
O16.
IS. B. Bartlett, Newport News, So, :
222 %
wv b. Eoeher Newport News, sas,-
573.
NJ. ]. Moore & Co, Newport News,
$24,714.
E. w Johnson, Newport News, s24, q
SS5.
Dm1lett Heisler, Washington, ID. C.,
S26.175.
Isaidwln & Peake. Washington, $751;
1Ca.
The proposals for heating and plumb
ms the Easement of The building We're
next opened. They Were as follows:
The Peck. Hammond Co., Cincinnati,
for indirect hot air system and plumb
ing ON basement floor, SALTS.
Meyer & Shepherd, Newport News,
same system, S4,3lS.
l. q. Gregory. Washington. ID. G..
tor Smead indirect hot air system and
p.un.oing, S4,4sO.
Z. Ears;l1nn. NEWPORT News. for in
direct steam system s6,o'oao:
>. a. EanueSFif put IN oid oa $i9e
Tor the plumo.nS, stating that die diu
net naEe tMne 70 make an estimate on
the nearing apparatus.
IN order uhat 1ulere illSalt not Oe Il
dnisund erstanuinS as TO the 5>teln
n.le bidders proposed 10 FURNISH. II Was
oSridSa t" ALLOW a reE'resenta'lNe on
e.t2h nim 10 produce ms p!9ns ana eN-
PAIN 10 the board dhe system he offered
toSeuhef WITH us merits. i ne coHtIstct-
o,s We're requested 20 repair 10 another
1at.11i ana rvona!a there W! they We're
caiieu ior' as IL Was sSferu oS ail pi4
Ties tha't uieS shouiu appear separately
ara make their stateinents, tnus pre-
Guiding the possibility for heated de-
bates and wind jamm!ng generally.
MT. K u Neinnardt, REPRESENT ing
the Peck. Hammond Company. oI en-
cimhau' Ghe lowest oiuueis' was trsI
eatlsu I ~ -. ~ -,
f'uloseu 10 'ut ~ m, Lie i'os ~ - s.sl'.'
'uisluS a.! Mas col'e e's oao"n ~ g .
o"eeeuS ~ 49, s'''> ~, - - ~
iooll's t1Iousu So, slus .e ~,
e<te't ioo1,l eou1o ia'e 'i10 $500. ,f's
~ ~. '' , % ,,, - 80 80
se..hs alo ~ ~ ~, 80 -,tis,, ,ni,
,sot ,hs foa,I a1,l ,-it;,,,.1 air Tn h,Ils
,hs.r., w,.,1l.1 r. ,,aeisr.-rs VIII ar. ~.
,,,r,ti ,,iyht y,.a,.,n ,,h,yir faa- Nri,h
NC swst..n, Mn NTa;aharllt Said Ia euor-
q Md 70 si,nnly zach room, Vim, (, 2m
c,,,hise foot W. air nal. nni,,,,,s I'M, COS
ets on ,,ha hasamhanI fioor wters 10 b..
fwshtd With tanks mat worked auto
,,,,il.,p,v ar,,,,,ysn,,ant 1,ains madn 10
CARRY off di.axrreaahl,. oa],r
nv @ Rarra,nin oF mis- CITY. vas
navt calisd IHa ~, id he wa thn hirnsst
ihiyld.sr nm, ~ should IL rano..,,, h.,.eis
tlhat ne ,,rrnuse,l 70 n,ut in IN. Ind,rec;
S,aan, ,haat system v4hi,sh was the best
and cn1ln ia .m,prat,d oh.uprr than
tha MOT air
Mr.. J. T. Mover stated mat Me proposed
to put in the same system as THAT pro
posed by the Peck. Hammond Co. He
Thought that inasrnuch as he was a
resident of Newport News, although
500 above the lowest bidder, the CON
tract should be awarded to HIM. He
was willing to .lop" off 500 and colnv
down
mfr T. G.. Gregory. of WASHINGTON,
exptaintd the snnead system OF indirect
hot air lhea ting, which was similar TO
that of the Peck, Hammond Company.