Evening journal., 1898-12-06
THE ARGUMENT LIST.
Gone Over BY the Superior
Court This Morning.
PUBLICATION IN DIVORCE GASES

COMMISSIONERS Make RETURNS
WHICH ARE FAVORABLE TO AP-
FdlCATIoNs FOR DIVORCE.
TIME SET FOR SEVERAL IdPoR-
TANT ARGUMENTS.
Superior Court took up the argument
/ list this morning and the session was
consumed in going over it and making
entries.
Judgment below was reversed In the
case OF David c. Reid VS. the State Of
Delaware. In the case OF John w.
Snitcher, d. b., VS.. John l.. Greenwalt
p. b.. Judgment below was affirmed.
The mandamus case of the State of
Delaware, John Hamilton VS.. Hiram
Lodge. was set for argument on De-
cember TO- Judgment below was af-
hrmed In the case of Forbes and Hart
man vs. the State of Delaware. The
demurrer was withdrawn and general
leave to amend granted In the case Of
H. Edward Addicks VS.. the Del p. & p.
Company. Like action was taken in
the case Of Addicks VS.. e. r. Cooper,
Friday. December l6. was set for hear
ling argument on the demurrer in the
cascs Of John r. Roebling's Son Com
pany VS.. Walker ID. Mode. Edward B.
Mode. Charles r. Reynolds Hoopcs
Bros. and Darlington vs. Walter ID.
Mode. Edward b. Mode, Charles +.
Reymolds; Southwestern National
lBank VS.. Walter ID. Mode. Edward
b. Mode. Charles IT, Reynolds; First
National Bank Of Harrington VS.. Wal
ter u. Mode, Edward b. Mode, Charles
lT. Reynolds: National Bank OF KEN
nett Square VS. Walter ID. Mode. Ed-
ward B. Mode Charles T. Reynolds.
: Publication was ordered in the divorce
case Of Florence N. H. Fisher vs.. Sam
, uel G. Fisher, and the finding of the
commissioner was favorable 10 divorce
A rule VISA made for the respondent
10 pay costs In the divorce case OF
Susan V. VS.. Joseph Wigglesworth
publication was ordered, and the re-
turn Of the commissioner was favor
able 10 divorce.
R General leave to amend was giver
the plalntiff in the case OF the White
Sewing Machine Company VS. william
= T. Forwood, Oh al The demurrer falls
December 10 was set as the time q
D hear argument on exceptions to th
n award of referees in the case Of DENIM
j. Mention VS. the Mayor and Council
Of Wilmington. Also as the time 70
k hearing argument on demurrers in th
q case OF John II. King, Frank Hender
son. Ahbie II. Baker and Alice E. Hen
derson vs.. the Wilmington and Ne'
~ Castle Electric Railway Compan,
Leave to defendant TO amend on pay
e. ing all costs since filing demurrer wa
o granted IN The case Of William Graf
w. Benjamin f, CHM, and amende
pleas were fled The mandamus cas-
AZ OF the Ferris Industrial School vs.. tn
~ Levy Court OF New Castle County wa
is set for argument on December II
he Publication was ordered in the divorc
e. case of Emily Jennie Miller VS.. Ed
I. ward Perry Miller
~ In the divorce case Of John r. Johr
l- sen Vs. Mary r.. Johnson the time fc
d. the return OF the commissioner wa
IN extended to December 8. Publicatio
IA. was ordered in the divorce case {
4. David j. Smith vs.. Mary f. Smith TIL
" return was favorable to divorce.
9 the divorce case of Margaret r. Baco
4 VS. Norris NJ Bacon the commissions
f. wac given until December y to MAX
"a his return. December s was fixed 9
the time for the commissioner to mai
his re.urn in the divorce case of Nj
VII belle L. Caulk VS.. Fletcher Caulk NJ
~ Cooper was appointed commissioner
On the divorce case CT Jennie May Blu
al lock and the case was continued
,ss the February term Like contlnuan'
was granted In the divorce case
" Charles ID. Jamison vs.. Kate Jamiso
Publication was ordered in the divor
IN. case Of Lena Callahan vs.. John X. Ca
* lahan. The return favors divorce ID
M cember / was set as the time for q
commissioner In the divorce case
Walter NJ. Mckay VS.. Annie s. Mex
Iol to make his return. Publication W
ordered In the divorce case Of Bess
IN M. Hickman vs.. Harvey p. HiclSma
lg- The return is favorable to dlvor'
~, JUDGMENT below was reversed In
case OF George V. Poverty, d. b.,
10y G. p. Howell. p. b. December 10 W
ING fixed for hearing argument Of the
in murrer in the case Of Wilcox. adm
eel ietrator. VS.. the Wilmington City Ra
tho way Company On that day the c;
Of ihe state of Delaware i'm relation
-" Edwards. vs.. the Delaware Pilot co
IL mtssioners, will be argued.
ent