The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1898-12-15
THE COURT RECORD.
Supreme Court.


1874. Snyder VS.. State of Indiana. Ben
ton c. G. Reversed. Howard, jim order
to bring parties before the court for indirect
brought to the knowledge of the court by an
information duly verified by oath; and that
a rule to show cause distinctly setting forth
facts be served upon the parties charged
with such contempt.
1915. Scott VS. State ex. rel Gibbs Ham
ilton c. c. Reversed McCabe. il. The
act of March g. 1897 (Acts 1897, P. 2SS), pro-
viding that the term of county treasurer
snail begin on the first day of January next
following the term of the present incum-
bent did not lengthen or add any time to
the term of office of incumbent at that
time. 2. Section 9, Article 10 of the Con-
to continue in office two years and until a
successor is elected and qualified. 3. Said
act fixed the time for county treaSurerS
term of office to begin in the future.
Appellate Court.
2641. Wishnand VS.. Fee. Monroe c.. C.
Reversed. Wiley, il Notwithstanding
the fact that widow elects to take under
the will of her deceased husband, she is en-
titled to the $500 allowed by Section 1896,
Horners r. s., 1897 when the will does not
To to The he n a tb Il pfsr
ton of the testator that the provision Of the
will affecting the rights of the widow were
intended in lieu of her statutory rights, and
that by the will all of the testators prop
erty was specifically disposed of, and that
the widow elects to take under the will, then
she is estopped from claiming under the
statute.
1913. Patton VS.. Matter. Grant S. G. Re-
versed. Henly. J:LWhere mechanics and
material men furnish material and labor for
a continuous period upon open and running
accounts, the contract must be treated as
continuous in the absence of a time specified
for payment, or the work to be done, or at
which the services shall end; and the fact
that the work was interrupted or any part
of it completed will not require notice OF
a mechanics lien to be filed for each part
and parcel of the work, but the notice, when
filed within the statutory limit of time, dat
iF1Cr EnnVr hn lnG nj
material furnished will reach back and in
clude all the items charged under the gen
eral employment.
2S11 City of Huntington VS. McClurg
Huntington c. c. Certiorari granted and
issued.
Superior Court.
Room IL. L. McMaster, Judge.
Eliza Gallagher VS.. The City of Indian
apos ct al; damages. Jury finds for de-
PENDANTS.
Henry wickers VS. Frank Page ct al;
damages. on trial by jury.
Room 2-James M. feathers, Judge.
The Red Clay Orchard Company VS.. Jas.
II. Smith. On trial by jury.
Room 3-Vinson Carter, Judge.
Charles A. Richert VS.. VIM. II. Schmidt
ct al; for injunction. Dismissed by plain
tiff. Judgment against plaintiff for costs.
Amelia klann and Robert DIETRICH, VS..
Citizens Street-railroad Company; dam
ages. Judgment on verdict against plain
George l.. Thompson Manufacturing Com
pany ct al. VS.. The Hay-Willits Manufac-
turing Company; accounting and receiver.
Dismissed and costs paid.
Jennie Stark VS.. Charles Woechter; dam
ages. Jury return verdict for plaintiff for
Circuit Court.
Henry Clay Allen, Judge.
Leo Roch ct al. VS.. Orville Z. Fox; at
tachment, ETC. Dismissed and costs paid.
James Boyce VS.. j.. A. Kinsey & Co. ct
al; on note. Trial resumed.
Criminal Court.
Fremont Afford, Judge.
State of Indiana VS.. Louis Reinhold; as
sault and battery: appeal from City Court.
Motion to quash sustained.
State of Indiana VS.. David Saloman; re-
ceiving stolen goods. Sentenced to ten days
i'll Jail and fined 81.
State of Indiana VS.. Frank CRUDE; grand
larceny. Defendant pleads guilty. Impris-
onment in state prison from one to fourteen
years.
State of Indiana VS.. Frank d. Hubbard;
keeping gambling house. Appeal from City
Court. Finding of not guilty.
New Suits Filed.
Jasper O. Tansell VS. The City of Indian
apolis; damages. Superior Court, Room 2.
Eli J. Scott ct al. VS.. Arley r. Murphy;
suit in replevin. Superior Court, Room s,
Harry e. Hamilton VS. Carl w. Menden-
hall ct al. mechanics lien. Superior Court,
Room l.
Mona NJ Garrison VS.. Frederick 7. Garri-
son; suit for divorce. Circuit Court