The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1898-04-02
CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS.

The NJ. o. r. Company Alleged to Have
Violated the Injunction.
Contempt proceedings were instituted
in the United States circuit court yes
terday against the Montana Ore Pur-
chasing company for alleged violation
Of injunction orders. There are two
complaints. One is by T.. Rollins Morse,
the plaintiff in the recent mining suit.
The complaint is based on the affidavit
of Frank Klepetko, who charges the
Montana Ore Purchasing company and
also its agents, employees and servants.
+. Augustus Heinze, Arthur p. Heinze
and John MacGinnis with violating the
injunction orders issued on the 23d OF
April, 1897. and the 31st day OF Decem-
Der, 1897. respectively, whereby the said
defendant m its servants, agents. en-
ployes, clerks and attorneys were en-
Joined and restrained from extracting
ore and removing ores from that part
Of the Michael Dewitt lode claim, lot No.
296, In township 3. north Of range z west.
principal meridian for Montana, In Sill
yer Bow county. state Of Montana, and
which portion is more particularly de-
scribed in said injunction and show
ing that the said defendant n its
van are now violating the said in
functions and each of them by emov-
ing n extracting ore from the said
premises, and the aid complainant hav-
ing this day moved the court that the
said defendant and its said ervants and
agents do stand committed of a breach
of said restraining order"
The defendant and F. Augustus
Heinze, Arthur p. Heinze and John
MacGinnis were ordered to appear be-
fore Judge Knowles at his chambers in
Helena next Thursday at 10 a. IN. and
show cause why they should not be
adjuiged guilty of contempt Of court
in violating these injunctions.
The other contempt proceedings is in
the case of the B.. & NJ. company VS..
h nj. o. p. company, F. Augustus
Heinze and Arthur p. HeinZe.
This is also based on an fidavit of
Frank Klepetko, who charges the de-
PENDANTS. and also their agents and
employees n servants. John MacGin-
mis-, F.. l.. Whitmore, Carlos Warfield
and c. s. McHenry. with violating the
restraining order issued in the above
entitled court IN the 2sth day of March.
1895, whereby the said defendants and
their servants. agents, employees and at
torneys were restrained from extracting
ore from within or removing ore from
that portion of the Pennsylvania lode
claim. lot Nc. 172. in township 3 north.
range Z west, principal meridian for
Montana, in Silver Bow county, state
of Montana, and which portion Is more
particularly described in said restrain
ing order and showing that the saf1
defendants and their agents are now
violating the said restraining order by
removing and extracting ore from the
said premises. and the said complainant
having this day moved the court that
the said defendants and their servants
do stand committed of a breach of said
restraining order"
The defendants, the NJ. o. p. COM
pany. f. Augustus Heinze and Arthur
p. Heinze, and John MacGinnis, +. l..
Whitmore. Carlos Warfield and c. s.
McHenry are ordered to appear before
Judge Knowles in Helena on Thursday
at 10 a. m. to show cause why they
should not be a~djudged guilty of con-
tempt of court in violating the restrain
ing order.