The Worcester spy. [volume] (Worcester, Mass.) 1898-1904, 1898-11-16

case of Henry A. Lord ct al. of Boston
against Levi Lincoln of this city was
heard.
The case is an action of contract with
an ad damnum of $500 to recover $212
alleged due for an advertisement in
serted for Mr. Lincoln in the Textile
World. Decision was reserved by the
court. Rice, King & Rice appeared for
Mr.. Lord and others; Hopkins, Smith &
Hopkins for Mr.. Lincoln.
The two cases Of Eric ]. Rundstrom
against Willard f. Pond were heard
together, and occupied a good share Of
the days session Both cases are act ons
of tort, with ad darnnum of $500 each to
recover for trespass. Mr. Rundstrou
purchased a lot of land from Mr.. Pond
and later, according to Mr.. Rundstrom' S
claim, Mr.. Pond maintained that Mr.
Rundstrom had extended his lot beyond
| the original limits as staked out Fur
! ther, Mr.. Rundstrom alleged in the first
suit that Mr.. Pond smashed his fences,
and in the second kicked over his hem
| coop and did damage to other property
near the boundary line. After evidence
! had been submitted the cases were con-
| tinued to Friday, when another witness
| will be examined. Burton w. Potter ap-
| peared for Mr.. Rundstrom; Daniel B,
Hubbard, Sullivan & O'Connell for Mr.,
Pond.
The case of Frederick A. Mann (guar-
diam against George H. Mann, which
was next heard, was a bill in equity
asking the court to compel the defend
ant, George H. Mann, to render an ac-
counting on the estate Of George w.
Mann, of which he had charge, the
accounting to show the extent of the
wards interest Decision was reserved
after the case had been considered by
Judge Aiken, Henry F. Harris appear
ing Tor Frederick A. Mann and F. j,
Barnard for George H. Mann.
The last case of the day was the bill
in equity brought by Charles M
Thayer against Adeline S. Bates to re-
strain the latter from foreclosing a
mortgage upon property on Belmont
street, which was held by Mr.. Thayer
as assignee. When foreclosure proceed
lngs We're begun by Mrs. Bates to Sc
cure possession of the property a tenn.
porary injunction was granted, SO thai
the case was heard on its merits. the
plaintiff as assignee claiming further
) that Mrs. Bates had refused to have
! the mortgage redeemed. Decision wa.
reserved. F. j. Barnard appeared FOL
MI Thayer as assignee; Charles A
nASlAlA1 IOE MrS. Bates.
. At The close of the session. Fl IT
Vaughan and Thongs H. Sullivan
I counsel for Mrs. Julia E. Osborn (ne,
Norcross), in the divorce suit which sh,
t brings against Thomas S. Osborn. asked
= 10 nave the case assigned at the mex
session II there were not sufficient time
10 near 1t at the present sitting. AfteI
the situation had been explained to tn,
q % rxro,e
on the list of contested divorces az tbt
december jury waived session. John b
scout represented the interests of Mr.
? Osborn.
me case of Joseph G. Spencer VS.. Ed
! WIN b. Spencer has been ASSIGNED a,
, the hrst on the civil list for the Decem.
T Ier session; The counsel are Kent &
A hearing was held in the case of w
H. Jourdan, the coal dealer. against
the worcester Electric Power Com.
pany, the suit being an action of con
tract, with an ad damnum of $500 r.
recover for several hundred dollars
worth OF coal Decision was reserved
on the motion made. F. H. Smith
5 appeared for Mr.. Jourdan: Eben n
' thompson for the Electric Power Com.
pany.
The case of Mats Matson ct al
against Alexander Anderson ct ais, is
: referred to Charles A. Merrill as mas.
ter 1t will be remembered that this
2 is the bill in equity to wind up the af.
/ fairs of the Finlanders' Grocery Union
/ one OF the most successful and famous
e cooperative concerns in the city. Mats
l Matson and others claim that they were
3 practically frozen out OF the partner.
l ship by the Anderson party, wherefore
they were unable to secure their iust
interest in the concern which has done
/ most hOurishing, and prosperous bust.
E ness. Marvin NJ. Taylor appeared fol
the Matson party; w. E. Sibley for the
: Alexander Anderson faction.
{ The following cases have been trans
t ferred to the jury list:
2SS8-LoweH VS.. Gile.
' 2S87-Wright VS.. Gile
. 2406-Burt VS.. Mulcahey ct al.
. Settlements have been effected in the
!. following cases:
e 29S9-George w. Andrews VS.. William
. D. Stone. Fay; Hudson.
i 2S75-CharleS S. Rackerman VS.. Sam
r uel e. Wiley. George S. Taft; A. F
: Brown.
v The following cases are passed:
: 2S44-Thayer, admr, VS.. Hubley e
n al.
i 2SS2-Thayer, admir-, VS.. Hubley.
2SS5-Thayer, admir-, VS.. Hubley Man
f ufacturing and Supply Company.
' al.
e The following gases are continued t.
December:
Q 663-W Whitaker VS.. Densnnore ct al
1752-Baker ct ali. VS.. Temple.
274S-Lesser ct ali. VS.. Greene ct al.
al 3S3-Pitts ct al. VS.. Lewis.
: 11S0-Fuller ct al. VS., Willard.
Today all divorce cases are in order
o The list is as follows:
3 2747 ION trial)-Rundstrom VS.. Pond
q Potter: Hubbard, Sullivan q OConnell
r 1924 ION tria)-Rundstrom VS.. Pond
. Potter; Hubbard, Sullivan & O'Connell
! S203-Cournyn, admir-, VS.. Cournyn
J. Taylor, McGovern; Sullivan & o'Con
4 nell.
!. 5S0-Abell vs. Moore ct al. Gile
S Wheelock, Cochran.
e 1279-Fay, exor., VS.. Fay. Samuel II
n Smith, Boston, c. F. Choate, Jr.; Jane
w. Mcdonald, Boston
2S46-McGuinnness VS.. Fairbanks e
al. c. M. Thayer; Gile.
Fairbanks VS.. Armstrong ct al
, Gle; e. M. Indyef.
5 Fairbanks VS.. Dorman. Gle
c. F. Stevens.
t 2ZParkhurst VS.. Fales, admr
e Kent & Dewey; pro Sc.
< 3177-Douglass VS.. Robert. G. w. An
: derson, Boston; M. f. Farrell, Boston
31S0-Lincoln, exor., VS.. Rush. P.
g Maher, Boston; 7. ]. Barry, Boston.
e 3252-Parker, receiver, VS.. Reynolds
: H. Parker, G.. S. Taft; T. ]. Barry
a Boston.
1754-Wilson, assignee. VS.. Wilson