Eagle River review. [volume] (Eagle River, Wis.) 1890-1927, 1898-08-18

Villas county Feb. 9TH 1898 and judg-
mentsrendered thereon by default Feb.
26, 1898 for 5000 90 damages and S53. 05
costs, and on the 18th of February 1898
it was assigned by said A. w. Sanborn
to the defendant, The Old National
Bank of Cambridge, Guernsey Co.,
Ohio, which now claims, as plaintiffs
are informed and believe, an interest
therein and in said order No. 1897, but
which interest if any such bank has, is
subject to all the equities and rights
existing between said Ann O'Connor the
payee in said order, and said county, and
which the people and taxpayers there
of have against said order, and the
rights of said Ann O'Connor and of
said Old National Bank of Cambridge
and it's assignes, if any it has, are sub
ordinate and subject to the rights of
said county and it's taxpayers.
That the order aforesaid No. 1899 for
S146. 10 in which Ann O'Connor is
payee was passed, as these plaintiffs are
| informed Eand believe, by a pretended
assignment to one F. L, Trimble and
with another order, an action was
brought thereon by the said Trimble
against Villas county, February 9Th,
| 1893 and a Judgment rendered thereon
| by default February 26, il89S for S2O6.1O
damages and $53. 35 costs, which was on
the 18th day of February 1898 assigned
| by said Trimble to the defendant, The
| Old National Bank OF Cambridge
Guernsey Co., Ohio, which now claims,
as plaintiffs are informed and believe,
an interest in said order No. 1899 but
which interest, if any such bank has,
is subject to all the equities and rights
existing between said Ann O'Connor
the payee in said order, and'said county,
and which the people and taxpayers
thereof have against said order, and
the rights of said Ann O'Connor and OF
said Old National Bank OF Cambridge
and it's assigns, if any it has, are subor-
dinate and subject to the rights OF SAID
county and it's taxpayers,
That all the four judgments aforesaid
and last above mentioned on the said
county orders issued to the said Ann
|O'Connor should be set aside and va
Gated, and the four orders upon which,
in mart. thev were rendered cancelled,
and the plaintiffs in said four actions
onlv allowed to recover what may be
eouitably due from said county after
the cancellation of the four orders is
sued to the aforesaid Ann O'ConnOr.
XIV. And these plaintiffs further
show that said county board OF super
visors of Villas county at their annual
session in November, 1897 issued order
No. 4377 for ST.. 90 to one d. E. Rlordan,
as payee, for stamped envelops, pur-
chased and used by the said u. +.
Riordan for his own use and as Munlcl,
pal Judge of said county. That SAID
order was issued without any authority
of law by the board of supervisors OF
said county and the same was not
legal claim against said county. Ihat
said order No. 4377, was passed Dy
pretended assignment, as these plain
tiffs are informed and believe, to one
r, II. Hanna and with large number
of other orders an action was brought
thereon by the said Hanna against said
Villas county, March 7, 1898 and Judg-
ment obtained thereon by default
through the collision and neglect OF
the defendant G. F. Sanborn, district
attorney of said county as aforesaid, Tor
5000. SO damages and S6425 costs on the
18th day of March, 1898, and said Judg-
ment was assigned by said Hanna on
the 9th day of April 1898 to the deten-
dant First National Bank of Wausau,
Wis. which now claim as plaintiffs are
informed and believe, an interest IN
said Judgment and in order No. 43H,
hut which interest if any said bank has,
is subject to all the equities and rights
existing between the said ID. r. Rlor-
dan, the payee in said order, ana the
said county of Villas and which the peo-
pie and taxpayers thereof have against
said order No. 4377, and the rights OF
said D. E. Riordan and said First Nat
ional Bank of Wausau are subordinate
to the rights of said courtyard it's tax
PAYERS. That said last mentioned ]udg-
ment should be vacated set aside ana
said order issued to said ID. n. Rlordan
us payee as aforesaid cancelled, ana
the said plaintiff in said action only be
allowed to recover what may oe eqult-
ably due him after deducting the
amount of the order issued to the afOre-
said D. E. Riordan.
XIV, And these plaintiffs further
show that there was an order unlawfully |
issued by said county board at it's an
nual ressiou in November 1897, num-
bered 1920 to M. J. Cantwell for legal
blanks. That the said blanks men
toned in the account and claim were,
as plaintiffs are informed and believe,
sold and delivered, by said Cantwell to
d. E. Riordan, Municipal Judge of said
Villas county, for his own private use
and not for his office as Municipal Judge
of said county as the said county board
of supervisors well knew, the bill
of said blanks being in words and
figures as follows, to-wit:
100 Oaths of Sale on Execution $500
100 Judgments on Failure to
Answer IUO
100 transcripts from Judgment
Docket 2.OO
100 Affadavits of Attachment
J. G.. l.OO
100 Certificates of Conviction 100
so Claims for Prin. Contrac-
tor Mechanics Lien LOO
so Claims for Sub. Contractor
Mechanics Lien LOO
so Notice Sub. Contractor Ne
chanics Lien LOO
so Affidavits of Extension Me-
chanics Lien 80
| so Complaints for Mechanics
lien 200