The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1898-08-11
SIit Of Exclusions Official AGAINST
the Republic.
REVIVAL OF A PAY CLAIM
A DiscOntinuanCe- Estate Matters.
Jury Trials Verdict in Dam
age e-StipulatiOns.

\ suit has been commenced against
the Republic Of Hawaii by Henry Zerbe
in the Supreme Court for the recovery
Of the sum Of S726.26, for money al
legged TO be due for work and services
performed by the plainun IS assistant
Appraiser and Examiner for the port
Of Honolulu The petition contains
the many ayermants and fOrmaGties
required by the statute. in order TO en-
able the plaintiff to get a hearing be
fore the Supreme Court. This claim
was allowed by the House of Repre-
sentatiyes at the last session, but was
defeated in the Senate. The suit has
the distinction Of being, perhaps, the
last against the Republic OF Hawaii
George a. Davis is attorney for the
plaintiff
A discontinuance has been filed in
the ejectment suit of H VI. Won Holt
Emma V. Harrison and Fred Harri-
son VS.. The Right Rev Gulstan I.
Ropert, Bishop of Panopolis, and
Brother Bertram. Kinney & BaIIou for
plaintiffs.
In the matter Of Helen P. Clark VS..
James X. KauIia, ct al, bill to declare
and execute a trust, Judge Stanley has
ordered that the rents now due and to
accrue pending final decision in the
case shall be paid into court. J. A
Thompson is appointed to collect such
rents and to pay from them such wat
er rates and taxes as may be due. S.
K. Kane, attorney for plaintiff; Kin
ney & BaIIOu, attorneys for defend
ants Estate of S. G. Wilder, Ltd;
James K. Kaulia, trustee, and Z. H.
Clarke in person.
The case of ING Shing, ing Yong
and Chock Fook, charged with rioting,
came to an end in Judge Stanley's
court early yesterday afternoon, after
a hearing lasting parts of two days.
The jury returned unanimous verdict
of not guilty and defendants were dis
charged. E. P. Dole, for prosecution;
Robertson, for defendants.
In the matter of EmiIei MacfOTlane
VS. f. K. Wilder and G. !. Wight, de-
PENDANTS, have signed a stipulation
giving plaintiff until August 80 to file
bill of exceptions in said ejectment
cause Kinney & BaIlOu for defend
ants.
In the damage suit of c. S. Bradford
VS.. Daniel Porter and w. S. Wise,
| plaintiff yesterday filed a bond Of $500.
| necessary to bring the case properly
! before the court. +. L. DOrtch is sure
| ~. Paul Neumann, attorney for plain
| tiff; G. X. Wilder for defendants
David Dayton, guardian of the es-
! tate of Daniel Fisher, deceased, has
! filed a petition to be allowed to eX-
pend the sum of $575.52 in repairs to
two buildings belonging to said estate,
same being necessary to ensure the
renting Of the property.
John Emmeluth, guardian of Elias
Jones, has filed in the Circuit Court, a
receipt of his ward for $1,047.6S. bal
ance of cash remaining in his hands
for said beneficiary. \ discharge from
further obligation is also noted in the
receipt.
In the suit entitled Henry Vida VS.
James Carly. 1000 damages, defend
ant has filed an answer denying each
land every allegation set forth in the pc
titiOn.
In the ejectment matter of the Ha-
waiian Commercial Co. vs.. KanUlu
Railroad Co. a stipulation has beer
signed by the attorneys of respective
litigants waving jury and agreeing
, that the court may hear the cOntro
versy on its merits.
The case of Young John Wing VS.
w. w. Ahana, $4,000 damages for ma
. Iicious prosecution, was heard in Judg
Perry's court yesterday. The jury
three dissenting, returned a verdict 70
plaintiff for the sum of 500. Dicke.
for plaintiff; MagoOn and Mechanism
for defendant.