The Stark County Democrat. [volume] (Canton, Ohio) 1833-1912, 1898-12-15
MAUDRU ESTATE
And BOndsman of the Late
Joseph Maudru
MUST ANSWER TO COURT
For the Deficiency In the County Treasury
OF Some Years Standing A Busy
Week Several New Cases
Filed To-day.

Fueu
Prosecuting Attorney Atlee Pomereue,
in behalf of the state II Ohio, today oom-
nIenced an action against Simon Maudru
and James S. Jump administrator de
bonis non with will annexed Of the
estate of Joseph Maudru, and thirty two
others, as boudsmen Of the deceased.
Plaintiff alleges that In mber, 1891,
Joseph Maudru was reelected for a
second term as treasurer Of Stark county
and continued as such until septeu per,
1894. Upon entering his duties in 1899,
Joseph Maudru as priioipal aoknowl.
edged himself to be held and bound unto
the state of Ohio in the sum Of S295, 900
that he should faithfully perform his
duties and pay over according to law,
all moneys which came into bis hands for
the state, county or township or other
purposes. If he failed TO 50 perform his
duties the bond was to be in full force
1t was approved by the prosecuting
attorney, the county commissioners aud
by the oath of said Joseph Maudiu.
Plaintiff alleges that during said
second term large sum cf money which
came int) tressurer's hands was ap-
pr pri ted, but that after bis term was
concluded he accounted for and paid over
all money, ircluding that which was
appropriated, save s690sO. which the
administrators have wholly neglected to
ply. Defendant Is indebted to plaintiff
in the sum Of $69O.s0, together with a
penalty Of ten percent, amounting In all
to s759.9s, for which Judgment is prayed,
together with interest from June, 1894.
OTHER CASES.
This has been particularly busy wrek
in the county clerks office, and thirty
two cases have been filed, which exceeds
any weeks work for long time.
Lorin Q. Wise as receiver for the Hollo.
W ay Paving Brick Co. has sued Jennie
and Ralph Spiro to cause the setting
a side Of an alleged fraudulent sale of
real estate. Plaintiff secured Judgment
against defendants at the May term Of
court for S5, O29. 90 and asserts that defen-
dauts in order to avoid payment trans
frrred certain property in Canton at
fictitious price. Nat g. Mclean repre-
sents plaintiff.
Mary Baer, through her attorney, Peter
]. Collins, has brought an action against
Gottlisb Graft TO recover 5000 alleged
damages. Plaintiff claims to have pur.
chased property from Barnard Kramer In
anton, and being sick gave defendant
81, 300 with which to make the payment
and securs dee1. 1t is slleg-d that in
stead of securing a deed in fee simple for
plaintiff, the defendant had it made to
her children, giving Ter only life
estate. When this was discovered plain
tin went to considerable expense In
matters, and she asks to he re-
imbuTsed in the sum mentioned.
Samuel A. Newhouse has commenced
an action against william II. Hatches ct
al. to restrain defendants from building
q ditch in Marlboro township. J. p.
Fawcett represe ts plaintiff
The case Of Mary McFarren against
George K. McFarren for slimony is on
trial in common pleas court today. 1t is
being contested. Sterling and Putnam
represent plaintiff and johnson and
Eggert the defendant.
Emma Killoway has sued WilliamsKil-
lowsy for ali = ony and the support of
two minor children. Habitual drunRen-
ness, neglect and ex treme cruelty are
alleged. An injunction askei for was
allowed restraining defendant from dis,
posing Of csrtaiG money in his posses.
sion. Robert II. Folger represents plain
tiff.
Q. G. Davidson, as guardian of W. s.
Davidson, an insane person, has sued
Peter Shear ct al. TO restrain defendant
from collecting judgment of S5S given
defendant in Squire Reigner's court.
& Mcdowell represent plaintiff.
X. A. Alcot has sued j. @. Streeter ct
Al. to recover sl,2O0 alleged due on a
note. John G. Mong repre- sents plaintiff.
Samuel. ]. Allen has brought suit
against james NJ. MoNeill to secure
Judgment for $740.65 alleged due on
,ount. McCarty g. Mcdowell are plain.
.ih's attorneys.