The Wichita daily eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1890-1906, 1898-09-02


Thomas F. Kelly VS. J. 7. P Clark
suit On account
J. P. Nolan vs.. 2 T. Dolan: damages.
George Johnston VS. G. ". Anderson {;
al; foreclosure
Edith Wildman vs.. Walter Morris: re-
covery Of money.
Wichita Loan and Trust company vs.
7. ". freshman; suit on note.
G. ". Spain VS.. J. P. Myers ct al: ap-
peal.
TIE Nashville Saddlery company ct a
vs. The Parnn * Orendorn company ct
a.; recovery OF money.
al; foreclosure.
The Redemption & Investment company
W. Benjamin C. Godfrey; recovery OF
money.
Citizens State bank rs y. E Monroe e.
al; recovery OF money
H. y. May vs. Joseph ". Jones ct a.;
foreclosure
Gust Sonar vs.. Joseph Stevens. dam
ages
Ora Mckinney vs.. George ". Van Wer-
den; recovery Of money.
Fred Meinke vs.. H s. Morgan e. a..
Marion H Hoagiand VS. Jane A Bur
nett 81 Al: damages
Sarah L Coons VS.. 8 ". Pierce; pos
session OF property.
Charles E Gibson VS. Emory L Bates;
attachment
Robert Massey vs.. The Atchison. To-
peka and Santa Fe Railway company
damages
John N Moor. VS.. Lizzie c. Sumption
ct al; foreclosure.
J. F. Wer5in vs.. L. G. Furnish: recoY-
cry OF money.
T. J. CASTOR rs the St Louis and san
Francisco Railway company; damages.
The Prudential Insurance company vs..
John F. Sullivan 81 a.; foreclosure
Charles steinmeyer ~. Henry Collins;
recovery OF money.
Robert H. Chisno VS.. ". u. Holmes e.
al: recovery OF money.
J. ". Walters vs.. Irving Ricnnond et
Al ;ejectment.
Sam Strauss vs. The Stock Exchange
Bank OF e Reno. o. T: recovery Of
money.
David A Sheppard VS.. TIE wildey Cas-
ualty company; recovery OF money.
s. I. Davis vs.. N c Mossnan; eject
meat
The Dempster Mil Manufacture com
pany vs.. G. ". Bennett; collection OF
judgment, etc.
H F. Thomas rs. Bank OF Douglas:
suit on account.
Mary Andrews vs. Edward A. Record
ct al; foreclosure
Lucy Z. Macrhewsou e. al vs.. George
B. Robbins: ejectment and injunctions.
Charles l. Boyd VS.. J. Q. Davidson; suit
On note.
field ct al damages for false imprison-
nen:.
The Hartford Western Land company
vs.. c. H. Bosley ct a.; eiectment ard
rent
The Buckle Printers Roller company
vs. Lizzie 5, Hagney ct a.; appeal
". y. Ewing. receiver, VS. T. H. Mahaa
and J. P. Hahan: eiectment.
Ernest Coll VS.. c. F!uckshaupt: recov-
ery OF money.
The City Bank Of Battle Creek. Mich.
IS. Alfred ". Kerr ct al; appeal
Hannah Stout vs. George NJ Dennis;
recovery of money.
J. P. Baden VS.. c. Wood Davis ct a.;
damages.
F J. Nicholson VS.. Robert VI. Piatt as
administrator, etc; recovery OF money
L A Weeden as executor. etc, vs.
Daniel G. Tear ct al; foreclosure
The Plano Manufacturing company vs.
Henry Shapcott e. al; change OF venue
rom Sumner county.
NJ c. Boebinger VS.. Mamie z. Ray g,
L: change OF venue from Sumner county
James Allison vs.. James 4. Burnett;
'ecovery Of money.
Isabelle Butts VS.. TIE City OF wichita;
lamages-
Z. J. Ormsbe. VS.. Albert z. Van Fleet.
foreclosure.
J. VI Rodgers as administrator etc. VS..
Nary H Tompkins; suit 10 recover on
,Ond
J. L EastIake vs.. william selvidge E,
I; foreclosure.
c. Bailey VS.. Harry Bertram Mellow
Z a.. ejectment-
els ct al; change of venue from Sumner
county.
Helen VI Andrus IS william Hodsou
( al; foreclosure.
z. Clark VS.. 81. Louis and San Fran
lsco RaNAy company recovery OF
money.
Alfred Cribben vs. Joseph H. MaGdy
{ al. foreclosure
Illinois Supply & Construction company
:. 0. B. Scocker suit OF account
H. J. Heinz & Co. vs. Harry L. Arnold
? al s,lir for damages fer false cerci1-
ate.
Wan & Brooks vs.. Sarah z. Kookeu et
i; foreclosure
City OF Wichita vs. the Board q County
ANN sSi oaers: recovery q money.
State OF Kansas ex rel. Du!cina "
Wade vs.. Everett Kobe: bastardy-
Minnie Drown e. a. vs. Sidney L Post
I al. cancellation OF certain fraudulent
eads ard mortgages
J. p. Massey vs.. 5. G. Nsr e. a.; re-
overy % money.
w J. Ceaser vs. Edward Goldberg .;
J. injunction
y. n Rlson -. Ire s.. Louis and san
francisco Railway conpa1y; recovery CT |
honey.
0. C. N.ms. trustee. vs. c. wood Davis
f. al suit on note
c. Dewey vs.. the Crystal Ice company
{ Al: damages
: \ WylIe - a. - TIE Crystal Ice !
orpz1y e. al; damages
5 A Carter vs. The Crystal Ice con-
any 81 a.; damages
7 5 Lee - TIE Crystal Ice company
: al. damages
: n Fls-cner vz TIE Crystal Ice con- +
any e a. damages.
Mary E Nortarup. adu..is,rz xix. vs- 4
,ri5zet :. Alderman e a, foreclosure.
Frances A Holden vs- George Dlck-1- (
Of. admin strztor. forsciosz-e
O. Z ? B-.ntoE - p 4 Love =. a F.