Republican news item. [volume] (Laport, Pa.) 1896-19??, 1898-02-03

anu Cu0feIOf0 W 10 cOuSlucItu uUOfo
suspicion. If the car porter had
taken the bag he had passed it to some
one during the night, but the defense
did not even hint that he might have
stolen it.
It was singular and yet strong
defense. IF the prisoner preferred to
fight the case out without revealing
her identity that was to her credit, and
could not be used against her. AS
she did not know the contents of the
bag, why should she be tempted? If
she had taken it what had she done
with it? She was perfectly willing to
be searched, and nothing had been
found. The old lady might have
taken it by mistake-even the college
president might have been tempted.
There was the train conductor, the car
conductor and the porter. AS the bag
had not been opened by its owner be-
tween New York and Toledo, how
could she swear that the jewelry was
in it at Buffalo and beyond? Mrs.
Wickham could only say that no one
else but Mrs. Taylor could have taken
the bag, and in all but one thing. the
prosecution made out very poor case.
The accused had persistently refused
to reveal her identity. 1t was argued
that if she were an innocent woman
she would not do this. She would
give no part of her history-say moth
ing whatever except that she was the
wife of a respectable and wealthy
man.
had been made foreman of the
jury, and when we retired 1 found
myself halting between two opinions.
No legal proof had been advanced that
Mrs. Taylor stole the bag, but if there
was nothing wrong about her why
should she conceal her identity? I
was almost of the belief that she was
an adventures, but yet I had sworn
to be guided by the evidence. On our
first ballot we stood seven for convic-
tion and five for acquittal. On that
ballot voted for conviction, but five
minutes later was using arguments
against such verdict. Deep down
in my heart believed Mrs. Taylor to
be the thief, but if we were to be
guided by law and evidence she must
be acquitted. The second ballot
showed,eight for acquittal and four for
conviction. The four men were pig
headed and obstinate, and we had been
out seven hours before one of them
decided to come over to the majority.
The other three vowed they would
hang out till doomsday, and we put in
long night in the jury room. After
breakfast the next morning | went to
work at them in earnest. l am neither
an orator nor magnetic man, but [
went over all the evidence and pre-
sented it, pro and con, in such man
ner that after we had been out about
thirty hours a ballot showed that we
were all for acquittal. This was the
verdict announced in court, and Mrs.
Taylor was at once discharged from
custody. Within two hours Mr..
Wickham had compromised with her
for $4,000 in cash. ---- -
AS the days went by that Verdict
bothered me. Mrs. Taylor Kad gone
to hotel as soon as discharged, and
Mr.. Wickham had hireI detective
to watch her. 1t was determined to
discover her identity, Ii nothing more.
The woman probably suspected that
she would be watched. After few
days she went to- Chicago, visited
lawyers Office bank and two or
three other places, and then bought
her ticket for Buffalo. The detective
had dqgged her every movement, and
she mad made no sign that she was
aware of his espionage. He saw her
leave the hotel in carriage for the
depot, and as there was plenty of time
he took street car instead. When
he went through the train she was not
to be found. The man worked on the
case for week without striking her
trail and was then hauled of.
When this instance came to my ears
1 was conscience stricken over our
verdict. The woman must surely be
a sharper, and we ought to have
strained point and given her over to
justice.
Two months had gone by, and one
evening l was waiting in the union
depot at Cleveland for train. 1 sat
reading newspaper when a woman
dropped into the seat beside me and
smilingly asked if she was mistaken
in thinking 1 was Mr.. So and So, of
Toledo. 1 replied that there was no
mistake, and then recognized her as
Mrs. Taylor.
81 am so much indebted to you!"
she said, as she held out her hand and
let her smile broaden.
''About your case at Toledo?"
"Of course. The prosecution had
poor case against me, but my lawyer
was fearful OF verdict of guilty, be-
cause refused to reveal my identity.
1t of course looked as if had
something to conceal. -
''But you didn't have?"
Didn't II" she exclaimed, as she
laughed heartily.
did you live in Buffalo, as you
claimed?" I asked
''Of course not"
sAp6 lent vour mama Tav1OroS