The Irish standard., 1898-10-08
venienced, whether in the location or

- .oS>A>ssN
company will accede to tho necessary
changes, ESPECIALLY III WE ASK
AS FANORS THINGS WE MAY
NOT DEMAND AS RIGHTS. 4
THE RAILWAY COMPANY
SHOULD BE CONSULTED ON ALL
THESE QUESTIONS, AND l BE.
L1ENE WHEN THEIR BUSINESS
INTERESTS ARE NOT MADE 10
SUFFER. IHEY WILL, AS THEY
SHOULD. GLADLY YIELD TO ANY
REASONABLE REQUEST ON THE
PART OF THE PU bLlC."
4ue CITY cuuuc4l, urged by the out.
ragged pubic, repassod the ord nance
over the mayors veto, July 70. 1898,
yeas 10. nays Z, u bare twu.tnlrus VOTE,
not Vote ~ spare. Inc company Tor
time d.sobcyed tho ordinance, and
appeal TO the courts by the olly was
necessary 10 ENFORCE II. Wlln r.. Q.
BrocAs, now one Ut the Democratic
judicial nominees III Hunnelin county,
AZ SPECIAL council, manuamus proceed.
lngs We're lUnen and resulted in
decision Ivy tho lato Judge
Smith, FeD. 25, 1894, which declared
the ordnance valid AMI determining
that it must ho obeyed by tue Railway
Company. 9ne case was SO clear aud
convincing that the company carried
tho fight no 1uriner. And thus, IN
SPITE OF MIR. EUSTIS AND HIS
NE.O, 1nE fEDrLE OH MINNIE.
AfOL!S nave AL LAST Az.
tIUlNED, AND NOW ENJOY, lnE
hI.'I1Io AM fNlNILEI,Eo Or
ulGll hE SOUG,IlI ~ iJEl IL d. y Il
lllEM. 80 .ur as no rUu4u, 4Mt. E..s..s
cnuv.vorcu - picN,nV tuu ,ua,.. 20 ..uu
enlorcoment VI inns ordinances. lad
MS WAL prevailed, ms p:upie VI Minnie.
upU.S WuulA uiIouuy nave ueru ruUuou
"a NullufGuS OK t.4uuSLuuS o. uvll;irs,
lor the benrht VI tho greatest mouup.
oy w,tnln inc Twin Cues; ana mad
tnere not boon eighteen m,mUers OF
the City Councll VINO refused TO DO
controlled by Easlls, and Il judge VINO
Was auiu u iAterpiev .ho 4aM un4 w..i.
ing 10 enforce IL, tnis uulawIu4 exAc.
uVu wuulu sl.l. cuutluue.
Iunnrniatury Y. Lnls Is The case
Which mas bcen made NOTORIOUS al
O,ot t.ie state ny tne protests vi luv ~.
"A. H., III winch Eus.ls slucd with lnv
Street Railway company ana against
TAG Veterans, III tho efforts u1 mo .u.lvr
10 protect Mcmurlai Day IRON uesevln
non. For ;hat dizzy, 1874, tho Mlnne.
apolls Park Board mad granted priv.
l"ges Tor games, bluycie racing and
o.ner SpJl1s Oh tho Park Boulevard
and grounds adJoln ~ Lakewood Conn
terry whore the soldier burial piut IA
located, ana whore inc pr.ncipat eXor.
cIscs Of the hal.owed day were to 10
Conducted ~ tao u. ~. II. Ino pco-.
pho wero very mucn aroused over tao
M \
nant. y committee of the latter, ON
Nay ii, appeared before tho Park
Board, asking 1T TO Withdraw the nor.
mus Tor Tho sports ut the point IN
Question. The Street Railway, inter-
eslou III the harvest of 1lvc.ront lar,s.
opposed tho r"uuosl, and when tho q.
a, IL. were apparently about to sue
Good, hustled in Mayor Eustls, VINO
WIS eX.oiilcio member of the Board.
lie made an eXtonueu spcecn Tor the
Company, anu by his Official influences
and his vo,o carried tho uuy. Tho vet.
Grams amt patriotic citizens wrro do.
featcd, tho races and games proceeded.
and the Street Runway received us
additional crop of nlckols.
1t might be added that this was tho
crownlug act OIL ms administrator that
assured his dcfeat for denomination,
whcn with the co;ibinod efforts of his
police aud election machinery, and Of
inc nonopolles he had favored, ho
could only muster onc,'ourth of tho
delegates, and was overwhelmingly
leloatod
Judging from his record, WHAT
WOULD BE The ATTITUDE OF
MIR. EUSTIS RESPECTING The
CORPORATIONS SHOULD HE BE.
CONE THE GOVERNOR OF THIS
STATE?
Would he. as in tho case of this
transfer ordnance. VETO ALL LEG.
ISLAllON DlSTASlEtULT TO THE
CORPORATION? Would he. as here.
tofore. ignore the rights. convenience
nni welfare of tho public. IN ORDER
no STILL FURTHER ENRICH The
CORPORATION OF THIS STATE?
Shall we DO told by the Governor of
MInne 'otn, us We were by tho Mayor
Of Minneapolis. TINT in dealing with
corporntions we should TASK AS
FANORS" those things which it is
our privilege to "DEMAND AS
RIGHTS; - and that II mere IRE.
QUEST ON THE PART OF THE
PUBLlC," from these monoEo les IL
not permissible unless 'TllEIR BUSI.
NESS INTERESTS ARE NOT MADE
10 SUFFER- should they comply
Herewith!
No man has over sat in the guberna-
torlal cnalr OF Minnesota VINO had DO.
foro hand SO demonstrated ms unfit.
moss to administer laws and public III.
tcrests. AS Mayor ho b idly SGT nsld,
such ordinances rs no did not choose
to enforce, and by his veto power and
influence did all in his power to lhwurt
the legislation of tho city lawmakers,
in favor of tho corporations. WHAT
mattcred it that he had hold his hand
nloft an | sworn l." execute tho laws
and ordinances? VIVA, would it mat.
ter, as governor? Tho Eustis principle
would endnnger every interest of the
peoplo. Whn,a refornor would this
be to right the crying needs of the
farmers for protection against tho
binding Irvine iniqnitios. in tho snlo Of
tho states product to those dealers
having The political "pull," that tho
farmer for whose benefit twino il sun.
posed 10 be manufactured, must pur-
chase from tho favored dealer Mt his
marked up price, when ho was to have
had it at cost? Imagine "GDvernor"
Eustis correcting this evil by applica.
ton Of his principle that we should ask
Gas tavors" what we should demand as
rights. Applied to appointment Of
Railway commissioners. he would
simply ask OF the Railway companies
whom they would have appointed, or
the elevators to reform tho crying out.