The daily morning journal and courier., 1898-12-13

GrouSSet continued his remarks in the midst of this tumult and recalled an article in the Intransigeant referring to letters from Emperor William and an interview between Count Won Mun- ster, the German ambassador at Paris, and M. Casimir Perier, the former pres- ident of the republic.
 Count de Nun, the conservative lead- CT, here interrupted the speaker and said he desired that the house be con- suited as to whether the discussion should be allowed to-continue. The pre- mier. M. Dupuy, said that as the head of the government, he protested With the utmost energy against the language of the speaker who, he added, had not measured it's possible effect. (Great ap- plause). M de Roulede, revisionist, shouted: Come off the tribune" This caused redoubement of the uproar.
 When semi-quiet had been restored, NJ. Grousset continued speaking. He said the centre of resistance to the re- vision of the Dreyfus case was no long CT the ministry of war It was else- where. As to the secret documents In the case, he pointed out that they had been ridiculed by Emperor William himself Gong protests) M Deschanel, republican, invited the speaker not to mix foreign sovereigns in the debate, any more than he would mix the presi- dent of the republic in them. M. Grous- set, continuing, spoke of the articles in the newspapers in which 1t was hinted that Russia and the czar were mixed up in the Dreyfus affair and he also allud- cd to the recent semi-official note rela- tive to the minister of foreign affairs, M. Delcasse, being obliged to explain certain statements to the German am- bassador-(vlolent interruptions)-re. tive to the latter's daughter (uproar and hcots.)
 Austria, M. Grousset said, was next mixed up in the affair. The speaker said he pointed out these matters in order to show that press campaign had been inauguarated by certain in terested persons to prevent the discov- cry of the truth. M. Grousset conclud- ed with demanding to know if the gov ernment was disposed to permit the center of resistance to the law to pass 1 from the ministry of war to the gen. eral staff of the military government ot Paris, if it would govern for the repub- ilc or for the Jesuits? (Applause from the extreme leftists and violent protests | elsewhere.)
 The minister of war, M De Frey cinct, repudiated M. Grousset's allega tions. He said that if there had beer some indiscretions it was unjust ant imprudent to attack the whole army l Unjust, because the army was excellent devoted to it's duty and incapable o1 the acts charged. In1prudent, because ] it was liable to lead to a disorganiza l tion of the military institutions. Int minister of war concluded with vigor ously protesting against the accusation brought against the general staff a1t the military government of Paris 0 resisting the law. M. Dupuy asked thl chamber to close the discussion ant adopt the order of the day, which wa
 done by a vote of 463 to 7S The hous, then adjourned. As one of the result
 of insults exchanged during the debat
 in the chamber to-day M. Antiet
 Boyer, radical socialist has sent hi
 seconds to M. De Roulede, revisionist
 and to M. Gauthier De Clagny), revi
 sionist, who characterized M Boyer q
 "whitewashed Panamaist."