The Elbert County tribune., 1898-11-10
STATE OF COLORADO, l..
County Of Weld. 'e-
Order .4llo1Oine Appeal.
30. ltl.

In this case the written verified statement IN.
RI and pts9g an to hs
and Beaver Canal company owner ofThe Upper
Platte and Beaver Canal, and The Lower Platte
Platte and Beaver Canal, the rame respectively
being cannls or ditchcs on which priorlties Of
water rights for Irrigation have been adjudcsted
by final decree, made and entered herein on the
2iet day of November. A. ID. 1886. has been pre-
sented TO the unacr.igned Jndae Of .aid Court; & in
carefully read and considered by said Judge.
statement that the interests claimed BY said
claimants in their respective canals are adversely
raa
10 the supreme court Of the. state OF Colorado
from said decree and portions thereof In which they
feel ngrieved; and that, as II said and claimed by
raid claimants, nn undue advantage In respect OF
prioritcs as against aald The Upper Platte and
and Beaver Canal company, is adjudicated at the
owners OF divers irrigation bitches IN said lriiga
tiSn District NO. The s owners WA o. Which sad "a
common adversely to the interests of said claim
mats.
examination OF said verified statement that the
names Of said ditches adversely Interested and
IN I ssid verified statemcnt N appeai are IN arcord
nnce with the said decree and With the original
statement. of claim nlcd ,p respeedtv.ly d oy the
Now, therefore, II Is ordered by the undersigned,
The Upper Platte and Beaver Canal company and
The Lower Platte and beaver fanal company,
* Colombo from certain portions Of said decree,
and more particularly the prayer thereof be, and
the same i hereby approved;
prayed herein to the rnpremc court Of the r.ate Of
Colorado lie allowed to The Upper Platte and Bea-
yer Canal company. as appellants, and against the
following named companies aud individuals as
fhc Teisei irrigating company, claimant OF the
Tetscl ditch, as.pcr sworn statement on hle; The
Fort Morgan Reservoir and Irrigation com
canal per sworn statement on ile, said company
being the appellee principally interested; The
ditch, as % per sworn statement on file; The Deuel.
and Snyder Improvement company, claimant OF
the Deuel. and Snyder dltsh, as per sworn state
Camfeld ditch, as per sworn statement on file !;
John Ward, Union Ward and Andrew wilson
ments on file; Bruce T. johnson and William H.
Edwards claimants OF the johnson and Edwards
ditch, as per sworn statement on nie; William
Mcclellan, claimant of the Mcclellan ditch,
per sworn statement on file; Mary Mackey,
claimant of the Corona Ranch ditch. as per sworn
company, corporation, claimant Of the Riverside
ditch, as per sworn statement on dlc. The A A.
a%ant q .hs A. smith @ dsh as per swoin
statement on file; Emma Farr, claimant of the
rarr ditch, as per sworn statement On aie; John
claimants Of the J. d. Cooke ditch, as per sworn
| statement on hle W. c. Schultz, claimant OF the
Saron Eaton and Andrew wson e"Sans
priority No. 81 and right TO use the water per
tanning thereto by means Of the Mimmack ditch,
as per sworn statement on file; Frank Ward and
Andrew J. Wilson, claimants OF the Valley ditch,
as per sworn statements on ale David 9. Wyatt
Wadn and Lnnt ditch, as per swon statement
on hle; The Fort Morgan Land and Reservoir
Morgan Land ana Reserpcr % oompanys 'as assb ms
| per sworn statement on file: Horace q. Pyott,
claimant OF the Brown aud Pyott ditrh, as per
| sworn statement on file: John NJ. @. Wadlin,
| claimant OF the wadin ditch No. 2, as per sworn
statemcnt on nle; Isaac d. Miller. claimant OF the
M'I ON Wei s sna ap fppPs Pssspssn Sss
partnership, claimants OF the GIL and stephens
ditch, as per sworn statement file: The p. II.
| Parsons lrrgatng Ditch company. claimant of
on file; The sand Arroyo Ditch company, claim.
per sworn statement on hie; fhe Fort Morgan
/ Ditch and Reservoir company, claimant of the
Fbou Reservoir Inlet ditch, us per sworn state-
mcnt OH ille
And It is further ordered us n condition to said
appeal that an appeal bond be hled with the cl, rk
lants as principals and with sureties to be ap
proved by said district court the judge thereof
Which, ss ie s5 sa M
either Of them In said supreme court which bond
shall be IN The penal sum OF one Thousand dollars
Done In chambers at Boulder, Boulder county,
Colorado, this 2sth day OF October. A. d. 1898.
JAY II. BouGHToN,
STATE OF COLORADO,
County of Weld. r''
J.. Frank Madden, clerk Of the district court OF
Weld equity, Colorado. do hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is true and correct copy OF
an order hlcd and entered in said court by the
| lSps =
Witness my hand and seal of said court this
18th day OF October, A. d. 1898.
Seal OF Dstrctl FRANK MADDEN,
iCourt Of Weld Clerk District Court,
tcounty, Colo. Weld County, Colo.