The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1898-01-02
JANUARY TERM OF COURT.
a Big Calendar Fun of Cases to
Be Tried.
@* 49, ~~ @E 49, krt+
THE COPPER CITY STEAL
The Gambling Cases and the Prizefigllt-
ing Matters to Come Up-Patch {
Forgery Case1The $4,000
Note Suit Jan. IL.

s44 ss44a. y : a "
/. The January term Of the district
court will convene on Monday morning.
There is a lot of work before the court.
Several cases of more than passing in
xerest are to be tried including the
eases against the alleged robbers of the
Copper City Commercial company. The
case of gambling against Griffin,
Neatherill and Shannon is also booked
Tor this term. The civil part of the cal
endar contains a very large number or
cases, the principal one among them
being that of Joseph A. Hyde against
Frank Durand, a suit in which the
plaintiff seeks to recover $50, 000, more or
less. alleged to be due on a promssory
note.
& The calendar for the term is as fol-
lows:
i The state of Montana VS.. William f.
Griffin. John 5. Weatherill and James
N. Shannon: the State of Montana VS..
James r. Gnose: the State of Montana
as. j. w. StrunZ; the State of Montana
As. Scott Galbraith; the State of Mon
tana VS.. Andrew King and Edward
Santry; the State of Montana VS.. James
G. Allie; the State Of Montana VS..
William II. Padgett; the State Of Mon
tana VS.. Everton j. Patch. the State of
Montana vs. Nose La Fontise and
John Cavanaugh: the State of Montana
VS.. John La Fontise and John Burns;
Montana Lumber e Produce company
vs.. Sadie j. Brown; attorneys, q. b
Winston and T. O'Leary. G. q. Birds
eye ct al VS.. Alvin Covey ct al. tat
ISSUE: attorneys, w. H. Trippet and
j. G. Robinson. ThaddeauS G. David
son VS.. Robert Morrell cat issue): at
torneys, Rodgers g. Rodgers and q. i.
Winston. George Parrot VS.. b., A. q
D.. Railroad company (at issue) attor-
neys, E. Scharnikow and Scallon e
Dixon. Mary Nelson, a minor, VS.
Sarah A. Nelson, administrators tat
issue); attorneys, q. =. Winston and
O. b. O'Bannon and Rodgers. The Null
len Fuel company VS. Joseph Queen ct
al. Cat ISSUE: attorneys. Walsh q Neu-
man and Napton d Napton: Peter
MertZig VS.. Thomas S. Hogan cat
sssue); attorneys. j. r. Boarman and
@. II. Winston. Bernard Brown VS.. 9.
Il. Sullivan tat issue; attorneys, J. NJ.
Self and Napton & Napton Israel
Glenn VS.. John w. Moss; attorneys,
John F. Forbis and Rodgers & Rodgers.
John Lewsohn VS.. Annie Du Bey ct al;
attorneys, c. r. Leonard and j. X.
Boarman. Claus Oldhaber VS.. j. Il.
Carroll CO. Cat issue) Rodgers & Rod
gers and G. Il. Winston. Walker d
Gibbs VS.. Maggie O'Connor Con demur-
rer). attorneys, Napton & Napton and
j. r. Boarman r. j. Riddle VS.. j. G.
Roberts Ton demurrer); attorneys, j.
w. James and q. II. Winston. Thomas
Mcguire VS.. j. T. Carroll cat issue) at
journeys ]. II. Duffy and G. Il. winston.
The c. c. c. c. Co. VS.. William Walsh
cat issuel; attorneys, 7. OLeary and
q b. Winston. The College of Mon
Hana VS.. A.. j. Calcott cat issue) attor-
sneys, j. II. Meyers and Rodgers Il Rod
gers. A. F.. Bray VS.. J. +. Foley con
demurrer) attorneys. I. O'Leary and
]. w. James. Nels p Staffanson vs..
the A. c. NJ Co cat issuel: attorneys.
Rodgers & Rodgers and Dixon, Mats
& Whitehill. Il. Staffanson VS.. the A.
c. NJ. Co. lat issueD. attorneys. Rodgers
& Rodgers and Dixon, Mats S White
hifi. Mary Holtz VS.. the \. c. NJ. Co.
lat issue). attorneys. Rodgers g. Rod
gers and Dixon. Mats a Whtehill.
John Murphy VS. Michael Tippie Con
demurrer); Sanders x Sanders and
Toole & Wallace. Butte Cash Grocery
Co. VS. Ralph DunleVey tat issuel; at
torneys Carroll q Leehey and G. j.
Winston Chief Isaacs ct al. vs.. G. 3,
Rinehart ct al. tat ssue), attorneys,
Whitehill and j. II. Boarman and Rod
gers & Rodgers. ID. ID. Walker ct al.
VS.. Mrs. Sarah Shlledy eat issue) at
4orneys, c.. b. Winston and j. X. Boar
man Anna l.. Hoover VS.. the n, +.
Railroad Co. cat issue). attorneys, q.
b. O'Bannon and William Wallace, ir.
Barbara Smith VS.. c. j. Smith tat is
Sue): attorneys, w. w. Goodman and
J. r. Boarman. Emma Meister vs.. c.
j. Smith tappeaD; attorneys, T. 0'Leary
and j. r.. Boarman. The n, T.. Rail
road Co. vs.. Anna Il. Hoover cat issue);
attorneys, William Wallace, ir. and o.
V. O'Bannon and Meyers. Joseph A.
Hyde ct al VS.. Frank Durand; set for
trial Jan. IL. y. m, attorneys, Durfee
& Brown and cotter x Dewitt. Will
lam r. Yelverton VS. c. Nj. Sawyer ana
wife lat issue) attorneys. j. r. Boar
man and c. j. Walsh. John Joseph vs..
John Fitzpatrick ct al. ton demurre);
attorneys W. w. Goodman and q. h.
winston. NJ. :. Aschhem VS.. ]. II.
: Boarman tat issue); attorneys, James
q Kelly and J. k. Boarman. Henry
Neustadler VS.. Joseph A. Hyde ct al.
ION demurrer); attorneys, Botlsin X
walsh and Forbis a Evans. William
Korner VS.. Della +. McEyoy ct al. at
William Coleman vs.. w. j. Matthews
Ell tal. ION demurrer). attorneys, y.
scharnikow and G. h. Winston. n. y.
Railway Co. VS.. George Blum lat is
eue): William Wallace. jr. and Trippet
a Rodgers. s. l.. Conklin VS.. \. Beck
rtead and wife Con demurrerl attor-
news Ballet Il Clements and Rodgers
e Rodgers. Grace Fisher ct al VS. the
Manhattan Life Insurance Co. ION de-
rnurrer); attorneys. Rodgers & Rodgers
and Clayberg. Corbett q Goodman J.
Nv. Frush VS.. John j. Walsh cat issue);
attorneys, NJ. ID. Kelly and Duffy and
N. w. Goodman; George Austin v>.
rrheo. Ehret ct al. Ton demurrer): at
Sorneys. j. C. English and G. J. Walsh.
I ucier1 Ponlin VS.. Conrad kohrs 81 al.
lor, denurrer): attorneys, NJ. y. Leehey
and Rodgers q. RODGERS. Ike =. Smell