The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1898-02-02
LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR
EIGHTY-Two CASES LISTED FOR
PEREMPToRY CALL.
Which Will Probably Begin On
Thursday Morning In Judge
Cherry's Division of the Third
District Court.

for a day or two to allow the trial 0
the case of Driver against the Sal
Lake & ogden Gas d Electric Ligh
company 70 be finished, is composed o.
81 cases as follows, which viii be takeI
up il the order in which they appear:
Louis Hyams ct al VS.. simon BAN
berger ct al; Jones < Schroeder; motion
TO re-tax costs; Rawlins q Critchlow-
16,00s.
2-H. w. Fuller VS.. Albert Smith ct al;
j. NJ Denny; demurrer 70 complaint
Smith x Nielson-2gS.
civilian Alfieck vs.. Salt Lake City
Railway company; Powers, Straup q
Lippman; motion for new trial; Rawlins
d Critchlow-Is, 10.
5-Sait Lake Building < Loan associa-
ton vs.. Catherine Ford ct al; Rawhns q
CritchIOw. Z. 5. Kinney; motion for new
trial; Richie * Richie, B. y. Smith
1881
6-AIartha A Williams VS.. C. Z. Angel:
King x John; demurrer TO complaint;
AIoyle. Zane < Costigan-S4L
salt Lake City vs.. John l. May,
treasurer, ct al; William Mckay, p B.
Hampstead; demurrers TO answers Mar
shall * Royle-59G.
S-W. h Roys ct al VS.. David Black
hurst ct al; " 7. Gulter; demurrer 10
complaint; Booth, Lee < Gray-9S9-
e-BelleVille Pump x ;. company VS.
John p. Sorenson ct al; Booth, Lee q
Gray; motion TO re-taN costs; Is. FerSu-
son, J. N Cannon-13, GIL
W-John H. White VS. Barlow ferguson
Grocery company; Young * Moyle; mo-
ton to require plaintiff 10 set out certain
instrument; II. c. Edwards-9S5-
u-John II. Bowman VS. Salt Lake City
and county; (. ". Morse; motion TO dis
allow costs; ". Van Cott-l2 SO,
2-Joseph NJ. Stout vs.. Oscar Zipf; f.
c. Waite, demurrer to Am-Comp.; Pow
ers, Straup 4 Lippman-354
12-Utah National Bank VS.. Sears-J ere
my company; Jones & Schroeder; motion
TO dismiss case; Smith & Nielson-l4,3lS.
1A-Utah-Portland Cement company vs..
Centinela Brick X, etc; j. X. Bordle;
motion TO re-taX costs; c. f & f. c
LoOtbOurOW-l5,t0o.
15-Alfred Green ct al. VS.. William At
wood: II. a. Smith. B. Ferguson; motion
to retaX costs; motion to strike out; mo-
ton for new trial; Richards * Richards
1905
ie-Utah National bank VS.. Isaac Sears
ct al: Jones & Schroeder; motion Tor
judgment by default-l4,3lS.
I7-New York B. & p. company vs..
Western Hardware company; Stephens q
Smith; motion to fix appeal bond; Charles
G. Dey-56l.
IS-John Hoefing VS.. John J. Roberts ct
al; Z. w Tatlock; motion TO re-taX
costs; D. b. Hempstead-l3.55 500
Bloomington Johnson & Co. vs. War
rem W. COray ct al; Krebs x Hoppaugh;
motion to change place of trial; Kimbau
& Kimball-1.10I
20-Bank of Commerce VS.. John W. Tay-
lor ct al: E. B. Critchlow; motion for
new trial: Marshall & ROyle-13,139
21-M. Il. Beardsley VS.. S. w. Morrison
ct al; Dey * Street; motion for new trial;
22-E w. Tatlock VS.. John Lu Taylor;
in pSrsOn: motion to dismiss appeal; in
person. 30
2s-s. r. Casino VS.. Alfred Lambourne:
Shepard & Sanford; motion 10 set aside
order of July 18th; Williams, Van Colt &
Sutherland-1,27l
company vs.. Rudolph Aft ct al; Jones x
Schroeder: demurrer to complaint; Mar
shall & Royle-1.322.
25-F. II. Bawo ct al. VS.. Rudolph Ain
ct al: Jones & Schroeder; demurrer TO
complaint; Marshall * Royle-1.323.
26-Charles Ingalls,. etc. VS.. a. 3. Mil
Ter; c. S. Patterson; demurrer; Booth,
Lee & Gray-1.36S.
27-Isaac WooIf vs. William Best ct al;
S. H. Lewis; demurrer; David B. Tewks-
bury-1.352
2S-Isaac Woolf vs.. William Best ct al;
S. Il. Lewis; demurrer 10 complaint; s.
p. Armstrong-l35z.
&-Utah Title & Insurance company vs. !
William Naylor ct al; Bennett. Hardness,
Howat & Bradley: demurrer to complaint; |
RaWlins & Hurd-1.359.
30-John H Hedges vs. N B. Johnson !
ct al: Booth. Lee & Gray: demurrer to /
complaint; 5. McDowall-1.3l3
31-Newton Henderson vs.. A L. Oliver; !
III. A Smith; motion to re-taX; Rhodes &
S2-James T. Monk vs. T P. Lewis ct
al: Rhodes & Williams: demurrer to /
complaint: W. Van Cott-14l6
33-Charles Burgess vs. Salt Lake City !
Railway company; 7. A. Williams; mo-
ton for new trial; Rawlins & Critchlow-
14444
34-James T. Monk VS.. Thomas P. Lewis |
ct al Rhodes & Williams: motion to /
strike out: w. Van Cott-1.4l6
35-Eula Wray VS.. Thomas kearns; Nor
ris Sommer. W. r. Hutchinson. Moyle, /
Zane & Costigan: motion for new trial;
Dickson. Ellis & Ellis. c. S. Narian-l. ia
35-Eula Wrav vs.. Thomas Kearns: Nor
ris Sommer. W. r. Hutchinson; Moyle.
Zane & Costigan; motion to re-taX costs;
Dickson. Ellis & Ellis. c. s. Narian-1,1l4.
37-Mary F. Osborne vs.. Eugene Lewis;
]. II. Murphy; motion for new trial; in
SS-Lillian Vanderberge p. Merchants
P association ct al; Powers. Straup &
Iippman; motion for new trial; S. h
SsEElizabeth p. Tucker ct al VS. Salt
Lake City: Stephens & Smith; motion for
new trial; W. c. Hall-l0,75 $50.
40-James A Cutler Us. Salt Lake City
Railroad company: s. H. Lewis; demurrer
to complaint: z. 3. Critchlow-1,53 $50.
H-Whitehead G. c. Co. ct al. VS.. John
Rawlins & Hurd-13,024.
42-FV hitehead c c Co ct al. vs. John
Fl. Bailey: = NJ. Thomas: motion to strike
put: Rawlins & Hurd; 1904.
4S-Chickaring & Sons ct al. VS.. John r.
Foulks ct al: Bennett. Hardness. Howat
& BRADLEY; demurred of Foulks; c. 5.
i4-John s. Sands vs. National Bank of
Republic ct al: Krebs d HOppaugh; de-
rurrer; McGurrin & McGurrin-1.531.
f5-Utah p. s. Co. vs. L. 9. Karrick ct
a.. Richards g. Richards; motion TO re-
az costs: Movie Zane & Costigan-14. 500.
ae-Mary S McLaren rs. M0roni l. ,
Gillespie ct al; \. IL SOnnedecker; de-
nurrer to complaint: c. 5. Patterson
.564
47-Utah Plumbing Supply company vs.
Z. c. karrick ct al; Richards & Richards;
notion for new trial; Moyle Zane K
costigan-14.C92.
SIS Hays ct al. Us. o. J. Salisbury eft ;
H.; Brown & Henderson; motion to amend
Bennett Hardness, Howat &,
Bradley. w. c. Hall .5G7.
z9-Ann /. Whitney vs. Joseph S. Rich
-rds ct al: Rawlins q Critchlow; motion {
or new trial; Z. l. Wiliiams-65S. ,
50-James Dwyer VS.. Salt Lake City;
Powers. StraUp & Lippman; motion for
lew trial: ". c. Hall-14S20.
51-B. X. BlOcS & Co vs.. Theresa Wer- {
Ter; Krebs & Hoppaugh: motion for or /
ppeal: 5. McDOwall-1Z6S. ,
52-Merchants National Bank. Omaha, !
= Simon Eiseman at al; Bennett Hark- q
less. Howat 4 Bradley; demurrer: Z. B. |
5s-George II. Ganoway VS.. Salt Lake J
Dramatic association; M0yle. Zane & 2
'ostigan; motion to disallow costs;
ferguson & Cannon-l4623. {
5i-Cunnington Co. VS.. =. J. p. Pascoe; l
Ioyle. Zane & Costigan; demurrer; !. NJ. !
55-A. K. Smith VS.. Salt Lake city, .
dickson. Ellis d Ellis; demurrer: ". c. t
fail-1 $50. :
56-Beckwith Com. Co. vs.. Robert For e
ester: William Kahn: demurrer to COM
laint; MOylc Zane & Costigan-14Is
57-Frank II Neiden VS.. Smith Parker;
lrebs & Hoppaugh: motion for new trial;
IOyle. Zane & COstigan-1f.559.
5S-Beckwith Com. Co. vs.. Robert For
ester; William Kahn: motion to set {
side service; Moyle, Zane & Costigan- 4
4l9 :
59-David Nawson ct al. VS.. W. E. Fer
& dom