The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1898-03-14
]. The COukrn
Rules for the Fifty-nfth District
Court-Cnses Set for the Week.

MONDAY, MARCH II.
Il Amt Peterson VS.. San Antonio aud Aran
4 sls Pass Railway CO.. dsnty kessler VS.
i Buck Grimes ct al. Ktns x kaufman VS.
Robert L. Ward ct al.
i TUESDAY MARCH 10.
A. +. Shaplcigh Hardware Company W
Wilson, Eyres x Co., W. II. Humphre
vile US. Houston Ice and Brewing Com
| pany, Mary l.. Thayer VS.. W. q. Heintz
WEDNESDAY. MARCH 16.
| Theo. Keller VS.. /, j. smith e. w
| Breeding VS.. Houston Electric Street Rail.
| way Company,
THURSDAY, MARCH Il.
| Charles Schluaze w Bonnell. Matthews
| & Harding. Hannibal Mobiles vs. City Of
Houston.
FRIDAY, MARCH rs.
| t. J. Boyles vs.. A. n Hitchler et al,
| Galveston and Houston Investment Com
| pany VS.. NJ H. Gtymes 81 al.
SATURDAY, MARCH 10.
| w G, Brooklng VS.. San Antonio and
| Arkansas Pass Railway Company. ~ Pack
| ard Troy Laundry W. Gerson e Fox.
Judge Wilson has promulgated the fol-
lowing rules which viii hereafter provai.
In his court:
Court will convene at q. N and ad :
Journ al ~ in.
=
and thereafter the three days rule viii
not apply to jury caaes Aet IN the nrst
Two jury weeks. which viii be tried IN the
order IN which set. no matter when reach
ed Commencing with the third week tho
three days rule viii hegig to apply 20 eases
set for Monday of the thlrd jury week
and thereafter, and as fast ms cases arc
continued under the three day rule they
viii be Immediately reset by tho court
lin tlp order which hn
frat Two jury weeks oil the next term.
This rule viii continue in force till tho
docket Is reduced 10 reasonable limits
During the May term which may BY law
be extended from the mist Monday IN
May TO the first Monday in September,
the three days rule viii be entirely done
away with.
Motions for new trial must he argued
the FIRST motion day after. Judgment. il
then fled Likewise all exceptions and
diiiDiory matters must he taken IN ON
motion days whether In Jury or non fury
cases. This rule will be strictly an
forced.
Exceptions TO ploa0ng~s, motions. etc,
IN case can he called UP ON the motion
day preceding the day on wcich the case
Is sci without notice TO opposing counsel.
and eau be called up on any previous mo-
tion day by notifying opposing counsel.
Bills or exceptions must be presented
10 the court within ten days after judg.
ment or ovcrruling OF motions for new
trial.
When on cali OF Jury cnsc lcadins
COUNSEL. or counsel Who prepared the case.
Is trying some case In the Eleventh dis.
irlct. the case shal be passed and DO
called as soon rs possible aftor tho at
torhey is free, but this rule shall not ah-
bly, TO any caao whern tho attorney has
set cases in the f'ifty-Hfth district for
the same date as The case called In tho
Eleventh district hut only IN cases where
on cali IN The Fifty-iluh district The M
torney IL In the trial Of some caso In the
Eleventh district which is set AT the dats
preceding the case on call In the Fifty
NTH district. and q reasonable time pc-
fore.
From anu after the beginning of ths
March term the following rule of The
Eleventh civil district court will be adopt |
ed In the Fifty-flfth district When a |
case is called, either FOR trial or upon anv
call OF the docket and there Is no nm
poarance Tor the plaintiff tho case will
bo dismissed for want of prosecution |
This rule will he strictly enforced
Beginning with the frat day OF tho
Maroh term OF the Flfty-lfh district
court, cases upon the docket more tban
TWO years old VIII he expected TO be tried
ana general order OF continuance viii
not be given in the absence OF some yoaa
showing therefor.
me eases set for trial In the county
curt Tor the week are as follows.
MONDAY, March i4th.
John i, Mueller W. Gut Colorado and
santa Fo Railway company
II. o. kenner VS. u. u, Carson ct al.
lohh =. wagner vs.. International ana
treat Northern Railroad company.
II. u. Ruinpy yS O. 1. Rartnu |
VIM. Manger vs.. l., Benegen
TUESDAY March 18th
~ u. Fox vs.. Houston Electric Stree,
Hallway company,
X p Jock va. san Antonio and Aranso,
ASS Railway Company
J. y Hoover VS., A. r. zimmerman.
WEDNESDAY, March 10th.
Carrie Bailey ct al. Vs. ]. V. Meeks =,
Boyd d Boyd VS. Mary H. Boyoc
W. II. Lighthouse vs., Whitman a. Salre
=, THURSDAY. March iTih.
,, r. l.oftus vs. w. W. Glass ct al.
William Mcllott and wife VS.. William
FRIDAY. March 18th.
Isaac Gimble vs.. Albert Erickson ct al
amp. -
atnes Lawior.
SATURDAY, March 10th
A. Lincoln VS.. NJ. n. Harrington et NJ
MAX Hirsch VS., Frank Dunn.
n Rutherford vs. NJ. A. Baker.
Allen Paul \ Co. Va l.. Housrnan
Souhiy Judge Shaw announces that iury
asses moi .reached by the hour Of adjourn.
y 10 tho evening Of the third day after
~ way 'or which they are Sc, down for |
III NH stand continued for the term.
bcginning with the May term ~ tha
ourf. the first two weeks win hc icvo,nS /
xc'uslyeiy to probate business. Tho seq
na ana third weeks Will be jury weeks :
M tne last week Will be noniury.
DiKoR cHoLIM SOCIETY. i
1nthuAIasttc Meeting Hem
day-The Proceedinss. I,
The regular meeting OF the Blkor cho,,,,
ociety took place yesterday afternoon q y
le Orthodox synagogue on Preston ava.
y ae, largo number Of members were ia
s y ana considerable enthusiasm :