Eagle River review. [volume] (Eagle River, Wis.) 1890-1927, 1898-08-18

referred to of $4,000 each an, \
given and issued without nv ANY, ANY,, N
of law, nominally as salary oH %uO'l
aforesaid. In truth and irSsoet
is nothing due on said last nam ns we
mentioned Judgment: it was imrrmo.
and surreptitiously obtained and VI
fraud upon Villas county and the ny
PAYERS thereof. The said G. p
born has received upon the fran6nI
orders issued to him as aforesa6 y
by his other fraudulent devices in
tanning law books and stamped
yelops, upon county orders unlaWa
obtained by him, more than his saIs,
for the year 1897, amounts to and
said last named Judgment shou1
wholly vacated and said orders INV
which it was rendered cancelled
That the aforesaid order No 400,
SI57 81 in which G. F. Sanborn isns~
was passed by pretended assipnrmss
to one r. e. Bosworth and with anon.
order an action thereon Wy
brought against Villas county by sS
Bosworth as nominal plaintiff, IN,
2lst. 1897. That said G. F. Ssp6n,
had due notice of said action as dist.
attorney Of said county and well kncr
| ing of the fraudulent issuing of as
| order without any valid considersi%
therefore, but disregarding his duty Nj
said attorney of said county and benz
in collision with said Bosworth tod
fraud said county wholly neglected 81
| defend said action and fraudulent
permitted judgment to be entered h
default against said county, August
| 1897, for $204.7l damages and SSS
| costs. That afterwards on the ISM E
day OF January 1898 said Judgment was
duly assigned by said Bosworth to said \
defendant, G. F. Sanborn who now an
| pears to be the owner Of the same.
That as hereinbefOre stated ther,b
now nothing justly or equitably due G /
F. Sanborn from said county and there
is only part of said judgment last men
toned, if any, that said defendant G.
F. Sanborn can rightfully hold or claim
against said county and the same should
be set aside and vacated and said order
No. 1912 cancelled and said defendent
G. F. Sanborn be only allowed to have
and recover against said county what
may be found to be equitably due to
him upon said Judgment.
That aforesaid order No. 1878 for
S259. O6 in which said G. T. Sanborn, is
payee was passed by a pretended assign
ment by said pavee to one G. F. Dunbar,
and an action by him was brought
against Villas county thereon January
26th 1898. That said G. +. Sanborn had
due notice of said action as district at
torney of said county and well knew
the fraudulent issuing OF said order to
himself without consideration but be.
ing in collision with said Dunbar to
defraud said county wholly neglected
to defend said action and fraudulently
permitted judgment to be entered by
default against said county: February
I6, 1898 for $259.06 damages and 1928
costs. That on the 18th day of Febru
ary 1898 said c.. f. Dunbar, at the in
stance of the said defendant G. (. San
born and in his behalf and interest, a
plaintiffs are informed and believe, as
signed said Judgment to the tlrs
National Bank of Rhinelander whlc
now claims an interest therein and
order No. 457S but which interest.
any it has is subject to all the equltle
aud rights existing between said defer
dant G. F.. Sanborn, and the said couI
ty of Villas, and which the people an
taxpayers have against said order frau
dulently obtained without considerable
as aforesaid.
That the aforesaid, order No 1896 fC
$500 90 in which said G, +. Sanborn
payee was passed by pretended Il
sienment to one May P. Trlmble al
an action was brought by her thereC
against Villas county, January 10Th Is
That said defendant, G. F. Sanbor
had due notice Of said action as distrit
attorney of said county and well kne'
of the fraudulent issuing and the wan
of consideration of and for said order
but disregarding his duties as said al
torney of said county and being in co
fusion with the said May P. Trimble
defraud said county wholly neglected
defend said action and fraudulent
permitted Judgment by default to
entered against said county, Februal
10th 1898 for $4,000 damages al
$50. 35 costs. and that afterwards on Il
18th day CT February 1898. al the l
stance Of said G. f. Sanborn an in b
behalf and interest, 81 plaintiffs are
formed and b,.lieve, said May +. Trl1
BILE assigned the said Judgment to Il
defendant The Old National Bank
Cambridge. Guernsey Co, Ohio, while
now claims an interest ia said ludgme
and sid order No. 1896 bat which /
tereot ii any it hes. is subject to all t
equities and rights existing oetwet
said defendant, G. T. Sanborn the pay'
in said order, and the said county, ar
which the people aud taxpayers there
have against said fraudulent order NJ
1896, and plaintiffs further claim tn;
said Judgment last above menuone
should be get aside and vacated an
said last named county order cancellt
for the further reason that upon ia
and equitable accounting between sa1
G. F. Sanboru, and said county the
Is nothing due said S&nborn. and II
said Bank last named as aforesa
holds said Judgment subject to all Il
equities and rights existing betwee
said defendant Sanborn and said count
That the aforesaid order No. 46ol II
S30O.00 in which said G. F. Sanborn
| povoo yroS nocca6 nv a pretended q