Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1898-11-16
Judge Hiies Releases Eleven Alegeo IN
happy Couples
stytSrttE ARE ON THE REGULAR CALL
VIA Fourteen More to be rrled Before
tho End Of the weeh wilson, 'no
candy Man, Closed "

.
given a hfaung while Tor ss1urihy
i've more eases. al wamtn' are on the
oiil.
The cour. room was crowded when
clerk Blair and Baur rlrHcti put In
an appearance thls morning. and by
I the time His honor arrived ihore was
scarcely seat ltft. NAry twoehlrds
% the audience was made up Of wo-
men. she remainder hsas composed OF
attorneys. reporters aaI morbid mind
a men.
The ares " the womsr seeking re-
lease. RANGED an the way from twenty
/ % sixty. Some were dark theirs were
fair a TOW were decli ily prepcssess-
/ ing ana q number were Otherwise.
| Two or three prompted 400 inquiry On
/ the parl ~ the unic1kers aa O. why he
I ever farslak her but lu ihe majority
Z Qf Instances whlapHrlnga could be
I plainly heard sympiihIzlng with the
d husband.
The nrE case called vas that q Ei.
len Foster against John ~ % ster.
The plaintiff icstinod that abe married
She dgfsndaut Ia thls city In the year
" 1890. Two children had been born 10
them. AGED sevon aud nve years. Her
I husband. she said, had nj provided FOR
] hfr since 1899. She aBi saw him ln the
sprlug and had heard nothing " him
] r.nCe, ufEhtr dld she care 90. for one
whole year. pialniln had supported
him, besides herself and children. by
washing. she dl1nt propose 10 do u
any more. Her husband was lazy
man aud wuuldnH work when employ
munt WAS offered him.
othcr witnesses c0rtuh0ratrd Mrs.
] NHaHa a.
cree, NH1 awarding plaintiff the cuH-
tody VI the children and allowing S25
attorneys fees.
The caAo OF Lizzie Pratt W Mllando
Pratt IT., VAS continued Tor .he term.
FAILURE TO SUPPORT.
The next case was Camilla Young VA
William Henry Young. piaiutin tea.t-
ned that she married the defendant ln
January 1893. ana that two children had
been born 90 them. Defendant. 10 was
stated. would get drunk and otherwise
conduct himself IN manner unbecnm
Ing a true husband. Plaintiff fuighor
stated that fot some tame past she had
been compelled 30 support herself and
. children by her own labor. Decree
granted together with custody of child.
run.
SUPPORTED HERSELF ny SEWING
Lima Jensen Va Hiram s. Jensen was
the title ~ the next case. According 20
the icatimony Of piainilr She parties
, We're married DURING the pear ikt1. ~.
PENDANT deserted his wife In 1884,. VIII.
moss said she didn't know where h,
/, was. lie was an able-bndlrd man. She
had supported herself by going out sew.
las. There u one child aged H.. whom
tn plnimin said was llviug wlih friend
In Idaho, Decree granted.
DEFENDANT WAS DEAD.
The case OF dena Nielsen " Gustav,
Nielsen was dismissed on motion o: G
2 ". Nielsen, plaintiffs attorney. Afr
Z Nielsen told the court that the defend
A ant was Killed eight days afirs tie auI,
had been MED. hence the m0.ion.
SHE GOT \ DECREE.
!, Marie Nor1qust obtained deere,
, from Nells Nuridulst on the ground ID
Z failure 90 support Mrs. Nnrdqulst sal,
y she married her husband IN 1850 an,
h. for some time past he had failed {,
4 provide her with ihe common necossar
les OF ne The parties reside nt Aturfal
and Mrs NnrdquIsi has three chllirei
; by former husband, Other witncsaeI
c0rruhurhtCd Mrs. NOrdquist ana judo
liilcs granted the decree prayed Tor.
A CRUEL HUSBAND
Cruelty and failure 10 provide werl
the Eroluds on which Ethel Van De
! water based hrr suit against gilbsr
Van prWater Tho plaiu,ltf tsstlns.
that ne and thedefendant were marie.
DO Dakota August 10 1850. ana tht
they had ilyci together IN Salt LAX
from 1890 up 10 year ego Van De
water, his wife aid had a bad tenn
per and had been guilty " applying
Vile cplthei. 70 her. More than ono,
h. accused HE VIE OF iundclity ON
day In July. 1891 h. raised a knife q
her a. the same time threatening &.
take her ne Other acts % crtielu
were testified 20. Plaintiff said INA
the defendant began his illifratmsnt y
her two weeks after their maTrlaRt
For ra'me time past she had been siip
porting herself BY settling type In ON
~ the city printing offices Two chl
drrn had been born % them, aged
and 4. b0ia boys.
Matilda Shar.ci. mother of the plaln
I'm. testified that her Hon-lu.law us..
90 get angry al the least tr.ne II,
had called her daughter an sorts o
names IN her presence. Her durhte
wife.
o.hrr corroh9rltlvs testimony wa
introduced ana the court GRANTED
| decree and awarded Mrs. Van Dewnte
the custody Of the children,
REFERRED TO CLERK.
The eases ~ Bella Randall w. Nathai
Randall, and James Johnson So Ia.
Johnston, were referred 90 Cl.rk nnlr
90 take testimony AMI report % "a
court.
ANOTHER CASE OF DISCRETION.
Wlnnfrrd Matthews obtained ID &c
cree Of divorce rom Richard Matthew
IT, on the grounds % desrrtiIn ln
failure % support, The wife tfstinr
that she and the defendant got mar
rlCi IN this city. June 3. 1885, and aha
three years agl, without any cause b.
far 40 plaintiff was concerned, DE-
fendlu, aalrduued her ana has Sine
failed 20 send her anything 80 supper
her,
Mary BanFs. mother ~ "a, plaintiff
clff0lorlted her daughter AID furhs
added that hcr child twas roo good
gIrl f.r me likes ~ such mrn"
THOUGHT HE WAS ALIVE,
Anna jackson W. George n, Jaekso
was be next case called, Plaintiff De-.
Iel that she married ihe lefondalt q
uts city Ia 1884 and that De dessrtu
. her 10 l5gl He went away, not slyin
where DE- was going, Eur two year
, plaintiff fAsd she had been employed &
a candy factory being compelled Co. *
lut and support herself and -four
yrar-old child.
+ Where Is your husband?" enquire
Haven't the least idea" Mrs. JACK
fIu answered.
Have you reason 20 believe him lly
. sngf' next enquIre1 the court
"Oh. yes, he's alive replied ne wl
ness, ~ aln't the first tlme he ca
! away from me"
, HE WASN'T EDUCATED,
0 May 3. y. wilkins obtained deer.
from James l.. wilkins on the gruun
] I'd % AHf lIrtHH D.. 81