The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1898-04-05
R. HART GREW curious.
LAWYENx IN TINE BRADLEY CASE
ENJOY 4 WAN OF WORDs.
Pr~v~as ns~~sS Psss~caaino -.
sern~y Hart fre~s tsestaa6 . Raeo
Iato yalise CAussa q scene.

Fur Few. me.apheriealsy speaking. ~
the preliminary sxam.natsen yesterday
InoEa.ng Of E. NJ Bradley on the charge
Of numbering ~. r. schsIdsrap. II was
4 hot time Al! around Justice Austin was
on his dignity. Assistant Prasecating A.
iornsy Hart was warmed up. and Attor-
neys Ronald and NoUis we're ready 10,
declare war.
The trogsle was over valiss. the coa-
tents Of which Mr. Hart desired TO zee.
aud which MessEs. Rcaaid and Norris
declared should not Ne revealed ansG the
case came up for trial ia the superior
court Justice Aus,in held with the de-
aud ous the secret.
The prosecuting attorneys once Agreed
with Attorneys Ronald and Morris. who
represented Mr.. Bradley. that the evidences
to be introduced by the state 1T the pre-
am.nary examination should be the same
as thar gwen at the Inquest. Under Tho
AGREEMENT ihs defense Was willing u
waive preliminary examination.
1t appears that a short time after q
complaint Was died in Justice Austtn'o
court against Bradley. his attorneys "
sued a sahpeena directed to John A. SAN
born. manager of the Equitable Life In
surance Company. requiring him to bring
into court a CERTAIN yaliSe. the property
of d. r. Sshelsisyup. who worked for the
Equitable. When Constable Whitforo
served the subpoena Mr.. Sanoorn sealed
The vaiise and placed II In the safe.
He appeared in court yesterday morn
ing with the vaiise. and Assistant Prose-
cutting Attorney Hart desired to 80 ito
conteais. Attorneys Ronald and Morris
eent.nsisd that the vaiise was simply
brought into court for the purp0ee -
having II placed in charge OF the court
and held sealed until the trial In the su-
pcr-Or court.
Mr. Hart insisted on inspecting its con-
tents, but Justice Austin held that an
agreement to waive a preliminary trial
had been admitted, and that the valtso
was evidence Of the defense and that e
was brought into court and placed In ito
possession simply for safe-keeptnx.
Then Mr.. Hart asked for subpoena
daees tecum on behalf OF ths state a.
rected TO Mr.. Sanbosn. and compelling him
TO produce the valise that u could b
opened. Justice Austin allowed the sub
posna TO issue. but decided that thu sub.
poeaa Of the defense took precedence over
that OF the state.
The court took possession of the vaitae.
Mr.. Hart said that he would see what Wau
in 1t. Mr. Ronald said that he Wouid not
and was backed UP by Justice Austin. The
atmosphere was warm and everybody had
blood In their eyes.
There was another subpoena addressed
TO Mr.. Sanborn. requiring him 10 produces
certain picture that Mas In the desk Of
Mr.. Seheiderup. He brought the picture
and IL proved to he that OF a woman rsclin-
ing on a sofa. The court took possession
OF II and sealed II UP for use at the trial.
Mrs. Schelderup was ordered 10 produces
a black revolver that IL was alleged ~.
Scheiderup owned. Mrs. Schelderup said
that she had not seen II for eiGhtsoa
months.
During the arguments. which were very
warm, Attorney Ronald spoke about the
mysterious man who searched the bradley
house. Mr.. Ronald said that Mr.. Hart
had better Issue a subpoena for him (Ron-
alb to bring into court the EVIDENCE
which the man Was searching after but
which vas really locked up In his (Hou.
sid'sl safe. After the atmosphere cleared
q trifie. Bradies- waived an examination
and was bound over for trial without
bonds
Mr.. Morris said that In waving ne d.
sired IL understood that the defense ins,st.
sst on a speedy trial. when asked q "a
the nature of the contents Of the yalIsn
which caused 30 much trouhJe. Mr.. Noyri1
replied that IL held ''flve queens"