The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1898-06-30
A STRONG REPLY
Continued from Page II


lulu 10 the effect that claims aga INST
the plaintiff should be presented forth
with to the defendants and that all
rents accruing from the estate afOre-
said covered by the deed aforesaid be
paid thereafter to the defendants, and
these defendants say that the plainuin
was aware Of said advertisements and
approved Of them.
Furthermore, defendants say that
after the execution Of said deed the
defendants from time to time executed
and delivered new leases TO tenants
of portions of the estate aforesaid COW
cred by said deed. and that plaintiff
was well aware of the execution Of
said leases, and that defendants never
heretofore executed leases as afore-
said, the defendant David Kawanana-
kOa having signed several leases for
her and in her name and by her eX-
press sanction heretofore whereas
subsequent to the making of said deed
the said leases were executed by the
defendants in their own names and
as of their own right with the knOwI-
edge and acquiescence of plaintiff.
Furthermore, defendants say that
the plaintiff has been paid by the de-
PENDANTS her monthly allowance of one
thousand dollars since said deed and
as provided therein and that plaintiff
has receipted for the first two months
allowance thereof and has executed re
ceipts therefor, receiving end receipt
ing for the same as allowance under
said deed.
Furthermore, defendants alIege and
say by way of answer to the para
graphs aforesaid in said bill last here
inbefOre named, that pursuant to the
terms of said deed they have paid and
discharged all outstanding indebted
ness of the plaintiff other than that
secured by the mortgage deed to A. S.
Wilcox out of funds other than those
forming a part of the estate conveyed
to defendants as aforesaid, said obi
cations amounting to some five thou
sand dollars. And these defendants
say that plaintiff has been made aware
Of the payment of said bills pursuant
to the terms of said deed and that
plaintiff after the execution of said
deed and by virtue of the terms there
of, ana when defendants complied
with said request and produced the
receipted bills plaintiff remarked that
defendants must have borrowed money
or mOrtgaged portion of the property
to have paid said bills.
Furthermore, the defendants say
that after the execution of said deed
and by virtue of the immediate owner
ship of the property set forth in said
deed created thereby the defendants
effected $4,000 worth of insurance up
on certain buildings and personal prop
erty forming a part of the estate con-
veyed by the deed aforesaid, and that
said policies were made out in the
names of defendants as the absolute
owners thereof; that the defendants
informed plaintiff of what they had
done and plaintiff asked to see the
policies, which request was complied
with and that plaintiff examined SAID
policies and was aware that defend
ants had insured the said property as
their own and expressed no disap-
prOval of said action.
Furthermore, defendants state that
on the LIST of April of this year, they
presented to plaintiff a statement of
the payments made by defendants for
and in behalf of plaintiffs current eX-
penses for two preceding months, de-
PENDANTS having paid the same on ac-
count of the instructions Of plaintiff
physician that She the plaintiff,
should not be bothered by business Of
any kind, defendants making payment
of the monthly allowance secured to
plaintiff by said deed by settling OF all
| of her current expenses and current
! bills and payment Of the balance IN
| coin.
| And defendants further show and
state that on said list day of April, the
plaintiff stated to the defendant J. Ka-
! lanianaOle that she preferred that her
monthly allowance under said deed be
paid to her in coin and that she would
pay her own bills: that thereupOn the
defendant aforesaid explained to her
that the doctor did not wish her to be
bothered with any business and there
upon plaintiff assented and made nc
further objection.
Defendants further say that after the
making of said deed plaintiff upon a
number of occasions, dismissed parties
applying to her for leases of portions
of the property covered by said deed
stating to said applicants that the
property had been made over to the
BOYS, meaning the defendants, and
that said applicants were to apply &c
said defendants for the lease in ques-
ton.
Defendants further answering the
paragraphs aforesaid in said bill state
that in many other ways plaintiff has
enthusiastically manifested her inten-
ton that said deed should go into i'm
mediate force and effect upon eXecu-
ton thereof. and has recognized sale
| deed as In tuII force anu eject III Law VI
Of defendants, and has claimed and re
cefved from defendants the allowance
and consideration and benefits Sc
cured to her hereunder.
| And defendants further answering
the paragraphs aforesaid in said bill
state that it is the opinion and belle
of defendants that the institution o
this suit was not the real wish or de
/ sire Of plaintiff, nor does it express
her true sentiments in reference Il
said deed and to the making thereof
but is largely the result Of efforts o
third parties whose plans and design
in reference to the estate Of plaintiff
have been thwarted by the execution
of this deed.
And defendants further answering
say that while they did not Obigat
themselves to explain all their trans
actions in reference TO said estate ate
the execution OF said deed to plaintiff
nor to seek and obtain the consent O
, plaintiff to all transactions in refer
- ence thereto. as a matter Of fact, de