Delaware gazette and state journal. (Wilmington, Del.) 1883-1902, 1898-09-29
REGULARS ARE JUDlLANT
hInations Made on Saturday
lot Favorable to AddICks.
ERTS DONE" BY ROBERTSON
ly One Unionist Non,ineef for
Representative.


<Nso Nt"kh IVY &spNoAatt Va Decuhs
The Republicans of New Castle
unity, at their primary election on
turday afternoon, made the follow
nominations, according to the face
the returns:
Cor Sheriff-John E. Taylor.
For Coroner Alfred ID. Vandever.
For Recorder of Deeds-Delaware
brk.
For State Senators First Senatorial
strict, Samuel M. Knox; Third dis
ict, Webster Blakely; Fourth dis
ict, James M. Shakespeare Fifth
Jtrict, Robert McFarlan; Sixth dis
! vet, Merritt N. Willets; Seventh dis
Met, Isaac r. Stats.
EIEpr Representatives in the General
N Pembly-First district, James
u ttchen; Second, Robert M. Burns
bird, James W. Robertson; Eeurth,
lines ID. Carter; Fifth, no nominal
bn; Sixth, Frank p. Ewing; Seventh,
eorge Frizzell; Eighth, John W.
fnnison; Ninth, John Pilling Tenth,
prry w. Hushebeck; Eleventh,
iarles Walton; Twelfth, Theodore III.
ark; Thirteenth, Boyd s. Cleaver
urteenth, Francis III. Lattomus
fteenth, Harry S. Woodkeeper.
For Assessors First Representative
strict, John G. McCaulley; Second
| lillian III. Hanna; Third, Harvey
offecker Fourth, Isaac W. Bowers
fifth, William r. Jones; Sixth,
hann; Eighth, Lemuel W. Grayes
I-L IL A,tI
II. Wise; Eleventh, John Barber I;
'velfth, Theodore Jones; Thirteenth,
kmuel Carpenter; Fourteenth, Joseph
Hutchinson; Fifteenth, James 9.
ynolds.
inspectors (for rural districts only
xth Representative district, First
Fction district, Lot G. Casey
cond, Thomas A. Beatty; Third, A.
Walton; Seventh Representative
strict, First election district, j.
erkins Groome; Second, Eugene
Iilliams; Third, Frank w. Fisher ;
purth, Frank L. Chandler Fifth,
bhn II. Peoples; Eighth Representa-
I've district, First election district, w.
Deighton; Second, John T. Pierson
Third, John G. Johnston Ninth Repre-
ksntative district, First election dis
let, Thomas s, Smith; Second, Hugh
Wright; Third, Oliver Rothwell
lfsnth Representative district, First
4cction district, w. II. Bradley
econd, James f. McIvor; Third,
Matter Burris; Fourth, w. e, Roth
| yell; Eleventh Representative district,
'irst election district, John W. Davis
iecond, Eugene Paxson; Twelfth Repre-
sntative district, First election dis
tict, John Koane; Second, Thomas II.
swan: Thirteenth Representative dis
rict, First election district, Alexander
,orbitt; Second, John W. Spicer
Third, Joseph A. Suydam; Fourth,
Iohn w. Dickinson; Fourteenth Repre-
tentative district, First election dis
Irict, Winfield Lattamus; Second,
Israel A. Harman; Fifteenth Repre-
tentative district, First election dis
trict, Charles w. FARRELL; Second,
Henry j. Smith.
X Nominations were made for the
ofiice of State Senator in every Sena-
{prial district except .the Second, in
which John Pyle, the holding-over
Senator from New Castle county, re-
sides, and, of course, represents. The
most exciting Senatorial contest was
ia the First district, where Samuel
nj. Knox defeated Robert Adair and
Btephen Downey, his plurality being
F'50. There was also three cornered
contest in the Third district, between
Webster Blakely, William Wilson, Jr.,
hnd George w. Webster. In the Fifth
district Robert Mcfarland had little
difficulty in defeating his competitor,
{ieorge b.. Money, in most Of the dis
{ricts. In the other Senatorial districts
there we're no contests. The following
for the Representative
domination had no opposition: George
Frizzell in the Seventh district,
charles Walton in the Eleventh and
Harry S. Woodkeeper in the Fifteenth.
Workers in both factions of the party
did all in their power to get out the
full party strength, so far as the regis
Fation would permit, and in most
ehses they were successful. The can
8idates were numerous and there was
much interest in the result. There
Mere no serious disturbances at any OF
the polling places. 9
g The Regular Republicans are iubi.
Int over tho result of the Legislative
Nominations. In spite of the fight
made in the Third Representative dis
hrict of this city, where George W.
Roberts was the Union Republican
candidate against James W. Robert
'9pn, the Regular, and W. S. Vernon,
ihted as independent, Robertson car.
Rcd the district by substantial
pluraIity. In the home district of j.
Edward Addicks, Brandywine hun
dred, the Sixth Representative dis
ltrict, Godfrey r. Handy, the Addicks
candidate, was defeated by Frank p.
Ewing, tho Regular. In the Third
senatorial district, Webster Blakely,
|considered n du Pont man, won over
William Wilson, Jr., Regular, and
George W. Webster, who was favored
by the Union Republicans.
Wherever there was Regular and an
lAddicks' man contesting for the legis-
'lative nomination the Regular invaria-
lbly won, with the single exception OF
New Castle hundred, the Tenth Rep
resentative district, where Harry w.
Hushebeck, the Union Republican, de-
feated James 3. Hance, the Regular.
That district is normally Democratic,
and so are several districts where the
Regular Republicans secured the nomi-