The Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1894-1???, 1898-06-17
SUMMONS.

IN THE SUPERIOR O.
robr StatG p OF lW@ SEa1 ,OURT OF THE
~; 0lnPof1 y % AG" Ior the American Surety
fiti vs. ZEE EuMIn York. corporation, plain
E n =, MS WE lOnkin and Elizabeth A. Ton
"; n James Tonkin, Mary A. TonBin,
WIZ InehOlt and Alice Wineholt, his
II Lpheus Byers and Ada Byers, his wife,
Ford and - Ford, his wife, the City
II Seattle, municipal corporation, E. S.
Rothchild, Mark Wilzinski Martin Nc
Andrews Arthur A. Denny and Mary A.
Denny, Mary NOlte and Fred Nolte, defend
ants. No. q, SOL Summons for publication.
The State OF Washington to the said |. D, Ford
and = Ford, his wife, E. S. ROthchild,
Mark WflZinski, defendants above named:
You and each of you are hereby summoned to
appear within sixty days after the date of the
first publication of this summons, to-wit with
in sixty days after the 10th day of June, 1888,
and defend the above entitled action in the
above entitled court, and answer the complaint
OF the plalntltt, and serve copy OF your answer
upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at
their office below stated; and in case of your
failure so to do, judgment will be rendered
against you according to the demand of the
complaint, which has been filed with the clerk
OF said court.
The object of the above entitled action is to OBJ
tain judgment against the defendants, Edwin
TOnkin, Elizabeth A Tonkin James Tonkin
and Mary Tonkin. for the sum of three thous-
and ($3000.00) dollars with interest at 10 per
cent from July l, 1891, less credit of one hun
dred 100000 dollars paid on August 9th, 1896,
upon the bond given by them to the American
Surety Company of New York, cestui que trust
of the plaintiff and for the costs of this action
also praying for decree establishing and fore
closing a certain deed of trust given to secure
the payment of the above Indebtedness, and
recorded IN deed records of the auditors office
of King county, state of Washington in volume
1875, on page lis thereof, and describing and COW
ering the following lands, situated in said
county, tO-wit:
block six-6, in Burke's Second addition to the
city OF Seattle, beginning at point on the north
marginal line of said block siX-6, siXty-60-
feet west OF the northeast corner OF said block,
and running thence south parallel with the east
marginal line of said block ninety-90-feet,
thence west parallel with the north marginal
line of said block sixty 60-feet to the center
line of said block, thence north along the cen
ter line of said block ninety-9O-feet to the
northwest corner of said lot tWelve-12, and
thence east along the north marginal line of
said block to the place of beginning; also lot
twenty -fve-25-in block sixteen-16, in Wash
ingtOn Central improvement COmpany's First
addition to Kent in King county, Washington;
also an undivided One-fOurth- 14-interest in
and to lots tive-5. six-6 seven-7, eight-8,
nine-9, ten-10, eleven-11-and twelve-12, in
block twenty-20 of Laws Second addition to
the city of Seattle, in King county, Washington
And also executed a deed, recorded in the
records of Jefferson county, in book "a OF deeds,
at pages 365 and 800 OF the records OF said Jefer-
son county, describing and covering the follow
ing described premises in Jefferson county,
Washington, tO-wit:
An undivided One-half-12-interest in block
twenty -fOHr-4-HllPs addition to Port Town
send
Also praying that in said decree the interest
OF each of the defendants in and to said proper
ty be declared junior, inferior and subordinate
to plaintiffs interest therein, and that the
equity of redemption of each of the defendants
be forever barred and foreclosed, and for gen
eral equitable relief
HASTINGS & STEADMAN,
Plaintiffs Attorneys.
P. @. address, "a Halter building, Seattle, King
county, Washington.
Date of first publication June 10th, 1898.