Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1898-09-01

strength OF document they hal not
even examined closely seems mex
pilcahle. The ssrilus parers ar.
naturally enough reserved In their
comments. The Temps saysi
I'VE will MOI dwell upon tho painful
side Of the matter. There IL something
In u that VIII prevent the friends "
truth from feeling that some cloud I'M
toiceptlng the ilghl should have been
dispersed In an accusation " forgery,
They can only repeat That "a spite OF
all the army remains intact In our re-
spcci and affecirn. The morrow o.
the day that Drcyfua was arrested up-
On The accusation q bstfaying hla
country. France. although believing
him guilty. found consolation in the
reflection thss original faults did not
attack the entire body. This thought
natural Of ten years ago-lA still valid
today"
The Temps then reviews NJ. Cavaig-
macs prfvi1ua utgrances. The pr,aani
war minister said no conEidsrlilan ~
the national slfety could induco him to
maintain an innncem man In prison.
Naturally. tn rufurc. the moment ha
nnds that one Of the most Important
documents, or rather tho most decisive
u all. Il flrgery. h. takes the only
slop poaslble. that T. 90 say. gives or-
dprz % arrest the flrgcr rs fhis alp
asks the Temps. NO we are only up
On she threshold of the truth We ar
hplding thc and ~ the thread thr
should guide us through the labyrinth
into which the country has been lost
| We have everything so Eain IN rsiurn.
Ing Nn nat dark hight. The hour
scents NJ hand when the nightmare viii
como 60 an end. onward toward thai
iouged Tor moment"
The Journal Dss Dcbats believes thl
t,yi''9n % TIE DreyT',, trial an abs9.
colonel flcnry's forgery docs ~ prove
Dreyius's Innocence. SIN" says n,
Dcblis "ihe fact that one N tha
| documents relating 10 the AMIR shows
! ihat a forgery had been committed I'D
I prove after thr trial the guilt u thi
condemned man. y a matter On sues
gravliy fh1i u must nccls1riy PRO.
| woke serious reflection aud vail FOR thg
most minute examination Of the other
/ documents on which the accusation
against Drryfus was built and oi IN.
/ the trial"
A. TO the minor papers. they or,
/ cfher iuhllant ~ vindic.lve. Ina, a.
they happen o be f1f or against Drey.
| fia Tho Journal. which u anii-Drey.
/ fnt says The former officers guilt
/ which WIS moro than ever proved dur.
[ Ing the scrutiny Of the evidence BY M.
[ minister. was wherein she forgery wai
discovered. This. however, ~ assertion
7 MOT proof"
The pntrl makes the atupcsylnr doc,
laraii0n that the discovery Of this
/ forgery IL proof that the other docu.
/ mcnts concerned Ia the caEc ar, Ecnu.
In.
/ The Paris, In lta last edition. says thni
at the ministry 81 war. officials az,
convinced that the forgery was com,
mittcd al the inHtiratlOn % Command
ant Patty De clam who was the OBJ
] icct of "a special attack on Zola Tor Mi
"meludpmatlc" antics with DrUyfui
7 when that oifcrr was Imprisoned
I awaiting trial. Col Du Clam. accord
] ing 10 the Paris. n looked upon a. mao
/ BY his colleagues. a curious recommen.
datio nfor "A man charged with such 4
crave duty a. the investigation OF evi.
F. dcncc bfnug . against the prisoner
charged with treason. =
Ths Lanterne says the man who pur.
] sued Piqunrt with hln testimony iron
. the nsslse court 10 the cabinet or tn,
] judge d'lnHtruction, l. miserable for.
Ecr who his not healtatcd 10 commit
a crime IN order to further som,
schemes OF the general stan.
The Petit Rspuhliauc says 'sTh,
confession ~ the forRvr Henry. opens
M the denoucment ~ the tragedy
with which France has been fighting foi
years In darkness"