The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1898-04-19
An INJUNCTION SIGNED
Another Big Mining Suit in the
United States Court.
IT WAS FILED YESTERDAY
The Boston q Montana Company w. the
Chile Gold Mining Company and
Others-rhe Suit Involves One
OF the Pennsylvania Claims.

There was more mining litigation
started yesterday and an injunction
was signed by Judge Knowles in a suit
of the Boston & Montana company VS..
the Chile Gold Mining company and
John MacGinniss. E. L. whitmore.
Carlos Warfeld and Stephen s. Ray
mond to prevent them from taking ore
from the Pennsylvania claim. The in
junction was signed by Judge Knowles
yesterday. Omitting the description Of
the property involved. the injunction
reads as follows:
Whereas. the complainant in this
action has filed in this court its bill Of
complaint against the above named
defendants. praying for a permanent
Injunction In the said cause, enjoining
and prohibiting the said defendants
from within the limits Of the Pepnsyl-
vania lode claim, lot No. 172, situated
in Silver Bow county; and whereas,
h said bill of complaint also prays
that pending the trial of the title Of the
a premises. that the laid defend
ants be enjoined and restrained from
mining OF extracting any ores from
"ithiiii III odio dIlu " =
moving n ores that nave already
been extracted therefrom.
And whereas, the court. after read
ing the said bill Of complaint. has set
10 a. m. IN 18th day Of April. 1898. as
the time for hearing of the said appli-
cation for an injunction pendente lite
n as to whether al injunction will
issue pending the trial of the title to
the sal premises.
And whereas, il appears to be a
proper cause for the ssuance of a re-
straining order pending the hearing OF
the SAT- application for an injunction
restraining the said defendants from
extracting or mining ores from the said
| premises and from removing any ores
| already extracted therefrom.
And whereas, the complainant ha
executed a good n sufficient under
taking i'm the sum of $4,000 in accord
ance with the requirements of the
judge before issuing the restraining
order. which undertaking has been ap'
proved by the undersigned judge.
Now. therefore il Is ordered that thu
application of the complainant for
writ of injunction pending the trial o.
an action to determine the right OF
possession of the said premises hall b,
and the same is set for hearing at tn,
judges chambers in the city of Helena
at 10 a. m. April 20. 1898. n the salt
defendants are hereby ordered and di
rected to show cause on the said da!
why an injunction should not be grant
ed against them. enjOining and re
straining them from mining or extract
ing any ores from the said premises
above described pending the trial o
the title to the said premises, pursuan
to the prayer os said bill.
And it is further ordered that tn
defendants are hereby strictly com
- os-4l ..uAar tho M In
and penalties which may fall upon yo'
and each of you in case of disobedienc
tina you forthwith and until the fur
Their order OF the his court and unit
the hearing of the application for a
Injunction pending the above entitle
action. desist from mining or extract
ing any ores from within the bound
aries of the ground hereinbefore de
scribed and from removing any ores al
ready extracted therefrom."