The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1898-03-26

my judgment
O. Is of fact this crossing that you speak Of
is that within Kahulu YOU understand it?
a. necessarily within Kahului it.
back of the buildings Kahuui;
settlement there
Q. Did you consider the proposition whether that
crossing within Kahulu not?
A. did consider that particularly and do
consider that question of any Importance here
O. Please consider it for the first time and tell
whether have received information which
knew base opinion whether that crossing
in Kahulu not?
A. Well your question is a very broad give
all of my information the subject Kahuui is hamlet
consisting of number of buildings
several warehouses and Kahulu Rail
road Company.
O. Is this crossing
a. One moment. The tracks in question point
leave this place designated Kahuui
waan Commercial and Sugar Company which it undis
puted Of down the and lots build
in Kahuui The the railroad
in question: be said be within any corporate limits
it be said to extend eastery direction
huu 1t extends in eastery direction from the railroad
terminus in Kahulu.
e. Putting the question again. have you information upon
which you-or any belief whether this crossing
be said to be in Kahuui not? A Certainly have
some information the subject and probably vau
able upon that point anybody eses would be-
O. Well did that nformation-what the effect of that
information that this crossing in Kahuui not? A.
My information belief that crossing
said to be in Kahului.
Q. And have you that conclusion you
to that conclusion before today?
suggested itself to n any way
O. So that that you makeare called upon express
opinion express the opinion and belief from the nfor
nation and belief that you have that this crossing
Kahuui? A. Since you placing the very free benefit
opinions under OATH them when called upon
is my opinion that that is not in Kahului.
Q. We got the free benefit opinions the neck
in this restraining ORDER will take little with
permission Did you receive any information
to whether Claus Sprekes and Hebron had
ing reference to the track at point covered by the
ing? A. I received upon that point.
O. What the information to the-any I'M
derstandng between the two? A. l received inorma
ton that Mr. Hebron considered his rights
property there including all of his railroad property
of certain statement made him by Claus sprecke that
although the property yielding him
$4,000 he concluded sell it and did sell for
the property itself would within very few years.
O. What was that statement? A. What was what state
ment?
O. consequence of the statement you said made by
Claus Spreckes to Hebron; what that statement
heard? At the filed it
merely in the form to which have testified have made
further inquiries since that / 10 that
called upon
O. What it he said? a. / telling you the
information which received in general did
purport language specific
by Claus Spreckels
O. Give it in it's general FORM significance?
a. OF what?
O. This statement made by Claus Spreckes
made him give up such good thing A. the time
affidavit made had information knowledge
take in opinions and time
O. Then will please hereafter leave
if you refer them what they are
a. One moment. think cannot be fairly charged
what you charge with here that the that
made my affidavit the statement which
which my information partly given general
form to which have testified that because of some
thatC had /