New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1898-06-22

The Brown County Session Began at the
Court House Yesterday Forenoon.
Twenty-Five Civil and Four Criminal Gas.
es now on the Calendar.

| 70 Nv" VI U40 O04Ouu04sE I
District court convened yesterday NOR
nipg, Judge Weber presiding.
The criminal cases awaiting the action
! of the grand jury are as follows:
State of Minnesota against William
| Eich for the murder of Wallace Greene
at Sleepy Eye. The state will be repre-
sented by Attorneys Hagberg and Davis,
the defendant by Somerville & Olsen in
case he is indicted. The warrant upon
which he was arrested charges him with
murder in the first degree.
State Of Minnesota against William
Busgect, charged with assault. Wheth-
er this case will be tried or not depends
| also upon the action of the grand jury.
Attorney Eckstein will defend HIM
should that action be unfavorable.
State of Minnesota against Don Men,
ear, bound over to the grand jury on a
charge of larceny, committed at Spring.
field.
State of Minnesota against William
Zimanski. Zimanski is the man who
got into fracas with the road overseer
of Home township and was placed under
bonds to keep the peace. Somerville &
Olsen will defend him.
The first case on the civil calendar is
the old suit of S. D. Peterson VS.. The
Western Union Telegraph Co. Should
it be tried it will be for the fourth time
aid with the prospects of another SUI
preme court reversal staring the plant
if ia the face.
The other.cases are not all new, many
of them having been carried over from
the last term. They are as follows:
Seymour Van Santword, receiver of
the Walter A Wood Machine Co., vs.. F.
II. Retzlaf. Huebner for plaintiff, Lind
for defendant.
Willis Cunningham vs.. Geo. Tauer.
Somerville for plaintiff, Davis fer de-
PENDANT.
Alfred A. Schlumpberger vs.. Bernhard
Reinhart. Steinhauser and Somerville
s. Olsen for plaintiff, Lind for defendant.
Alwina Benham VS.. Mary Ingraham
and others. Lind for plaintiff, Davis
for defendant.
Werner Boesch vs.. Chas. Engel. Eek
stein for plaintiff, Somerville and Olsen
| for defendant.
Amun Skulstah vs.. Peter A. Shellum
and others. Lind, Somerville and Olsen
for plaintiff, Hammond for defendant.
Frank Leonard, as receiver, VS.. Will
liam E. Gross and others. John Ives fol-
plaintiff and H. J. Peck for defendant
Frank Lorber VS.. J. c. Geiger. APP.
peal from Justice court. Hughes for ap.
pellant, Lind for respondent.
The North Star Shoe Co. VS.. L. P
Jensen. Lind for plaintiff, Somerville
and Olsen for defendant.
L. G. Thornton, as administrator, VS.
Julius Kruger. McMillen for plaintiff
Somervllle and Olsen for defendant.
l.. G. Thornton, as administrator, VS.
William Gieseke. McMillen for plain.
tiff, Somerville and Olsen for defendant
Barbara Schlegel vs.. VIM. Buggert
Suit for damages. Somerville and Olser
for plaintiff, Eckstein for defendant.
August KALI, as administrator, vs.. Ths
Winona s. St. Peter Railroad Co. Sui
for damages. Eckstein for plaintiff
Brown and Abbott for defendant.
| Louisa Cutting VS.. George Weber anc
others. Eckstein and Lind for plaintiff
Hagbere, Somerville and Olsen for de-
PENDANTS.
Henry Scheibel vs.. Nels Anderson, al
sheriff. Hagberg, Somerville and Olser
for plaintiff, Eckstein and Lind for de-
PENDANT. ~-
L. D. Thayer VS.. Chas. Semans. Eek.
stein for plaintiff, Geo. Olsen for defend.
ant. 49,. --
Union Hall Co. vs.. Chas. Lindemann
with Carl Engel as intervenor. Baasen
for the Union Hall Co., Somsen for Llnde.
mann and Engel. T.. =.
Petition for laying out of judicial
road on county line between Brown aud
Redwood counties. Eckstein as attor.
ney for petitioners.
In the matter of the assignment Of Mic
Kuentiz and August Kelm. Somerville
and Olsen for plaintiffs.
Evan Evans vs.. Mary Evans. Thos.
Hughes for plaintiff, w. F. Hughes fol
defendant.
The Minneapolis, New Ulm 6 South
western Railroad Co. VS.. Ed. Stockert.