The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1898-12-11
SIYCOURT ADJOURNS
,ra Brought = : Close Yes
isftsy Eveaiat
su,. JURY FINDS FOR DEFENDANT
vyas On Special lssaes'
s-,ssi Court Held Ne
session.

49, vyap On Spechai sssaeS'
-,..i Court Held Ne
session.
.r yesterday adjourned the
3. z. AFTER having disposed Of .
~ ~ amount Of business since TAX
Il. !. 4. Office. The Jannary term OF
III open on the 9TH OF next
~ = I. R. Mccasland against the
S,sotric Street Railway company.
n. ~ plaintiff Dought TO recover
y. alleged personal injuries. was
~ ,ssIerday. the Judgment being IN
81 - defendant.
~ \. ~ no session Of the criminal
cart yesterday.
A.xs .stth civil District Cours.
S'uowlrg proceedings were ha'S be-
y sIa1s wlison yesterday
s.sss IN 70. Annie Burnett; plaintiff
~ 80 % withdraw Jury fee and de-
si - MY; case rcfst for December 49,.
n y sAdams vs.. Galveston, Harrisburg
~. lnroaio Railroad Company ct all;
:zs'S. biainuff to file trial amendment
,2.2 snnudcd Original petitions; leave
SSlSant To file flrst amended Original
SE. tenaral demurrer In defendants
%! 1921 original answer to plaintiffs
NJ 51rnded original petition overruled,:
Sars except; motion to strike out
zSsls parts OF trial amendment over
s;'i: njdrxi6 disrnisses as to San Antonio
b. 5000 Pass; continued by defendant.
i'ir,9 McOssiand vs. Houston Electric
- hallway Company; verdict on spe-
n isinss ana judgment for defendant
N n Skapleiga Hardware Company W.
- ryres q Co.: on trial.
neventh civil District Court.
y, allowing proceedings were had ~
,,dgs Tod yesterday:
~ Barbee VS. City of Houston; d.
1set frst special exception ovewuled,
,tAh defendant excerpts.
Dpec1y Lumber Company W. HoGstnn
Tta Works Company; plaintiff has leave
m1ud The amended petition filed on
Kubes 8
ic Sspvis vs.. Mary q. Williford ct al;
NIsut for plaintiff for $26l.49 and In
VI n. o'Donn~ll ". Epoch Ketchum;
sud generally and sct for first Jury
" = February term without prejudice
4 y Blssr ". O. 7. dDolmes ct ii: st for
er ~.
N1k c. Colby " Q. A. Beusor: judy
II psainuf dor amount sued Tor WIN
1ue and interest.
~ Howe vs.. Sam r. Cohbon q Il;
1od b. operation OF haw.
- Martin vs.. john Martin; tudgment
4 ~ piaintin for divorcs.
~ KAts smai1Wood W. J. w. SIMON
n;sa tf1al.
y = Hs.na NJ. Utisabeth HStasr; leave
eehnlaN to flo nrst amended original
80 snsn ~. o. n. Small; Indignant
~ pldndn for divorce.
County Court.
- Aaowius proceedings we're Aad be-
- Mags vasnter yesterday:
Mns !. LOTUS vs.. W. W. Glass Of al:
y 1880, costs Of subposnas Illegally
Nninst defendants.
ltsidenhans We. Cash & LSckel; mo-
y st aside order allowing $3.50 Is
neys tees granted.
1900 Lthographing Company ". o.
0Ner; continued genensllv without
ads 70 pending motions.
PROBATE COURT.
- y Texas vs. Pat Copeland, iunany.
rat True 3. Wagner. minor; Thomas
MGaacs, applicant for letters Of guard
ssits for Civil District Court.
~ following suits for the civil district
were filed yesterday:
\. Edgar We. Rebecca Edgar. divorce
x-sne Ruben. Joe Ruben and L,ll/
NJ, by next friend. VS.. Houston and
Il Central Railway Company; damages
sum Of $4,000 for the death of
~ Ruben on October % or 23, 1885,
nng from injuries alleged to have
ytained while in the discharge Of
= a brakeman for defendant
ssits for County Court.
S nuowtng suits for tho county court
hlsd Yesterday.
"a Bros. vs.. J. W. Barrett: asSt
~ !: z. Z Pilot ". +. W. senov.rling:
Real Estate Transfers.
moving real estate transfers vera
sAerday:
!.msr to Mary L. rcaav.r
9 Thayer. w. ". Thswer
~ Maria L. Clark. WilI1ed-
~ ener and Edward S,haef-
~ scres Of land adjoining
Hunls survey ;. ..,..,. 81
~ % Houston to Emma d.
nt | block 1893, south
Buitiio bayou. ....,,... %
sssr TO Harris county; i s.io
the Habermenl survey.
Ge,{.M by Rose Hill and Wet
emery road
!. uage by sheriff, to n. B.
@ .. 8. I. block TO-; lots
.. =. 10. II. ~, block 10,
~ u inirl edition, north
y suffalo bayou. 100. 400 |
AarriaEc Licenses.
0w'ng marriage luoeuses we're is
snx the past week:
Amzie and Jane HAL.