The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1898-02-27

1
side Buffalo bayou s...ss.- ~. -
! II ~ I,indsIey and wife Zulu CD
| 10 W. B. Root, lot ", block o'' Mi.
| la Porte ....,........''.,'''''f.s'
Tilfy-Fiftb CiviI District Court
Tho following proceedings we're had ~
tho FIfty-fIfth aiysi district court yes'er-'
day. Judge w. II. Wilson presiding:
Frank Karcher ct n VS.. Eliza Karcher'
| j. X. West appointed guardian TO repre-
sent the minors, bond liked NJ sou.
Texas Savings and keai Essate insui
ancc company VS.. w. a. Tryon et al; gen
ernI and special exceptions contained III
! the first amended answer OF the defendant
/ oyerruled. to which defendant excepts.
| w. l.. Sweeney VS.. j. G. Mcneil ct al;
] motion TO require security LOT costs
| granted.
L. Koeer VS. j, a. Keener; motion 10
require security for costs granted.
Agyle Cohen VS.. irwin Cohen; motlon 10
| require security for costs granted
Henry House VS.. American Surety com
| pany; motion to require security Tor costs
G. C. Morse ct al vs.. w. G. Corbett ct
al; motion to require security FOR costs
granted
Robet Cook vs. Matte Cook; motion to
require security for costs granted
Altmont ct al; motion to require security
for costs granted.
Houston and Texas Central Railroad
company vs.. Calvert Coal and Clay COM
pany; the original inventory or receiver
filed February Q 1898, is this day exam
liner, approved and ordered recorded.
Frank Woods VS.. Patsy Woods; judgment
for plaintiff for divorce.
I e. H. Dupree VS.. Texas and New Orleans
Railroad company; the Texas and New
Orleans Railroad company and Houston
Electric Street Railway company IN open
court withdraw their motion for new trial;
plaintiffs motion for new trial oyerruled.
T. d. Cobbs VS.. Houston Belt and Mag
nolia Park Railroad company; the report
of the receiver, filed January 10, 1858, eX-
amined approved and ordered recorded.
T. C. Mckay VS.. H. C. Pye; Judgment
for plaintiff perpetuating injunction, and
by agreement the costs are adjudged
against plaintiff.
Adoline Colbert ct al VS.. L. Il. Brown ct
al; motion to be allowed to appeal without
giving bond granted.
James Murphy VS.. City of Houston mo-
ton to require stenographer TO file state
ment of facts oveTuleu.
G. L. Garrison vs. Lulu V. Mansfield ct
al: motion to strike out plaintiffs first
supplemental petition granted by agree
ment
Betsy Conner vs. Cecilia Fisher ct al;
motion TO set aside non-suit granted.
City of Houston VS.. l.. ]. Murchison;
motion for new trial granted.
City of Houston VS.. George II. Breaker;
motion for new trial granted.
II. r. olcott VS.. j. T. Shotwell; motion
for new trial overruled.
II. j. Berwind VS.. Galveston and Hous-
ton Investment company; ten days after
adjournment allowed within which to file
statement OF facts.
The following cases were dismissed for
want of prosecution:
$, j, Hoffman VS.. Isabella Boyd.
Meyer, Schur a. Co. VS.. T. Freed & Co.
Martha w. Hudson VS.. James Charlton.
T. l.. Ross VS.. J, o. Ross
George H. Breaker VS.. j. II. Tenant.
J. Nj. McCord IS Louis Korn
II. DeIayalla VS.. G. ~ Phelps.
S. T. Rhodes vs.. Il. W. Jones.
Scarf d. OConnor vs. Texas Lumber
company
w. NJ. Farrell VS., Ida 3. Farrell.
Houston Land and Trust company VS..
William Wood
Lille Hall vs.. Archie Hail.
Mutual Building and Loan association
We. S. A. Nedig.
Mutual Building and Loan association
VS.. p. L. Hadley ct al.
Il, Wilson VS. Walter Wilson.
W. r. Stewart VS., Rena Stewart.
Massie \. Wade VS.. D. f. Wade.
Nelson Steel VS.. Della Steel.
W. NJ Roberts a Co. VS.. Percy Allen.
Alpha G. Arnold vs. A. f. Anderson.
Sarah Jones VS.. Susan Summers.
Eliza Evans vs.. William Evans.
Maggie Washington VS.. William Wash
ington.
Andy Pierce VS.. w. W. Glass.
7. T. Sellers VS.. j. o. Ross.
mary Lott VS.. Arkansas National bank
ct al, '''''A
J. o Davis VS.. Odd Fellows Building
Henry jackson VS. Molie Jackson.
Henry Miles w. Sealy Miles.
Moses Stark VS.. g. A. Burton.
Delcy Kitchen VS. Albert Kitchen.
NJ. y MAYER VS.. Magnolia Park comnanv
a. g Baker VS.. Il. l.. Simpson.
Martha Barnard vs.. j. C. barnard
aohn II. Wood VS.. Elizabeth Wood
~ Ewing VS.. j. B. Pares.
j. = Embrey VS.. T A. POPE ct al
Railroad company cans