The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1898-05-24

D~unlCatton.
The article in question was introduced
and cad TO the court. as follows:
ATTENTION"
I'm a long-winded and badly written
advertisement. a suspended member OF
the American Ticket Brokers' associa-
ton again questions my cnviable privi-
lege of subscribing myself as n vice
president of the above organization. His
arguments are almost as lame as his
English IL may he an empty honor to
receiye the complimentary vote of
Americas creates ticket brokers for an
honorary office, but Il IL preferable.
nevertheless. tn the disgrace OF being
cast out and discountenanced by Tor
mel fellow members. Personal respon-
sibility cannot exist where "A murky and
unsavory record brands an individual
as unfit TO enjoy the confidence of an
indulgent public. For particulars APP
ply to the citizens of Leadville. Colo.
AT the last convention of the Amer
lean Ticket Brokers' association one d.
Goldberg was accused and convicted OF
conduct unbecoming a ticket broker. BY
the same body of men the vice presi-
dency was conferred upon me. and the
CALLING sensation OF being kicked out
may somewhat explain the disconnected
dwelling Of the aforesaid culprit.
"A. PINCCS.
'Vice President of the American Tick
ct Brokers Association
on cross-examination. Mr.. Wines
asked Goldberg regarding the trouble
he had with the American Ticket Brok-
ers' association. but the witness was
very evasive i'm his Mr..
Campbell objected on the ground that
the matters sought TO he brought out
were strictly matters of defense. and
could not be brought out on cross-ex-
animation. The objection was over
ruled. and Goldberg was asked IT he
had not been fined dismissed from
the association. He said he had paid
a fine. and was reinstated.
WAS not the fine assessed and paid
in relation to Mr.. Pincus' membership
of the association
mot exactly on that recount, re-
piled Goldberg.
Were you not required by the ticket
O00?''
Not by the association"
Then by whom"
Two or three friends of Mr.. Pin
GUS
Was it not by a vote of the Ticket
Brokers' association at st. Louis?'
mo. sir; not by the association"
by the executive committee. or a
majority OF the committee?"
by two friends of Mr.. Pincus.'
How many members were on the
committee"
lnEtt UT lbuE Ut nNts
Did you not pay Mr.. Pincus N.000?'
Not To Mr.. Pincus. j paid II To the
association"
For Mr.. Pincus?'
Il don know"
Well, you paid it,"
Yes, sir"
Did you pay Il for any other rea-
son than on account of the trouble had
with Mr.. Pincus I'm the association
An objection was sustained.
Why were you adjudged to pay the
81. O0O?'
Another objection was sustained. and
Mr.. Wines said he wanted to show that
the fine was assessed and paid because
of conduct unbecoming "A membe Of the
Ticket Brokers' association. and that
the world '%culprlt" I'm the published arr
ticle had reference to that matter. The
court, however. held to its ruling.
Mr.. Wines questioned Goldberg about
his career i'm Leadville. to which Pin
Gus article had made "A reference. and
asked him IL the article i'm that regard
hurt his feelings and reputation.
Yes, decidedly" Eas the answer.
Did you ever I've in Lesdville, Colo
rado?"
Yes. sir"
When
Il can't remember. but I think il was
! don't know. I'm sure. | think in
1881 or 1882"
What business were you engaged
i'm"
Il was employed by my uncle"
Who was your uncle?"
Mr.. Goldsoll."
DO you remember the publication in
a Leadville paper of an article i'm ref
erence to your conduct of your uncle's
business"
mo. sir"
Did you ever give your uncle a pa
per acknowledging that you had used
some Of his money!"
NO. sir"
Did your uncle ever accuse YOU OF
intimate hat you used some OF his
money while working for him.
NO. sir"
Mr.. Wines asked Goldberg IL he had
ever admitted TO any one that he tool
money from his uncle. but the court
sustained an objection 10 the question
m ruled that ne would have to Civ
the date. names and places Of such ad
mission or conversations Mr.. Wine
then asked the witness If he had not
some time in 1892. at his shop on MAR
street. talked to |. y Jacobs about al
article alleged TO have appeared in q
Leadville paper. Goldberg denied tina
he had ever had such a conversation
with Jacob lie was asked If in tn,
fall of 1Sss Jacobs had not asked hin
why he tool that money from his uncle
and that he replied that he needed th'
money 10 stnu 10 MS motnef, VINO wal
poor in the old country. Goldberg de
MED il. on redirect examination IN
said he felt so ashamed when the ar
ticle appeared that he would not e
out on the streets. and for "A tim,
thought OF leaving town. He tried {,
keep the matter from his wife. bu
somebody sent a marked copy to he
I'm New York.
Herman Blank. the second witness
testified hat he was in the employ @
Pincus at the time the alleged libellou
article was published, and he wrote /
nj the request Of Pincus. who mad
him acquainted with the circumstance
related" and Blank composed the ar
ticle for publication. He asked me 4
put in terse language so many facts 70
publication" said the witness.
Goldberg was recalled for turtle
cross-eNamination. and Mr.. Wines sub
mitted TO him several letter press copie
Of letters. and asked him If ne recog
nized them as copies OF letters writ
ten hy him TO |. n. Jacobs. The Wit