The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1898-02-16

two. IL the act can thereby be rendered
harmonious. Tho general purpose or
view. and absurd or oppressive conse-
quences avoided as far as possible. state
VS.. Daniel Wash, IS Pac. zi3. People VS..
Jaehne. io3 ". Y. is2.
Observing these rules we enter upon
the further consideration OF this act.
First going back To the necessity of an
appraisemsns. We desire to call attention
TO section Is OF the act. which seems 20
have been unnottced from tho briefs
This section clearly recognizes that /sere
are cases where no appraisement is re-
quired. To what sales does IL appIyg
Section 3 speaks Of an estimated value 10
be furnished by the Judgment creditor;
section I provides that IL the debtor II
not satisfied herewith he may except and
vsdcs that the creditor may demand
an appraisement. If he Is not salts
hed with the debtors estimate. But
evidently section is did not intend to
except those cases where no other APP
praisement than the first estimate. or es-
Inmates. WAS demanded. Because IL the
debtor should except 10 the creditor & esti-
mate and thus bring about the further APP
praIsement provided for al the instance
Of the creditor. and section is means. the
apprassensut provided for IN section :. the
debtor VIII be punished for excepting 10
she creditor s estImate by cutting Oft onn
year OF his period Of REDEEM ptlon. For II
this is the appraiseulent that is meant md
none is had she deed would not issue until
ore year after confirmation. II an afp-
praisercnt ls had the deed issues isnmedl-
aiely after confirmation. There would be
no reason for providing fwo different peri
ods Of redemption 70 1T these cases and a
cogsnt one against IT II section GO. Vol.
. OF the code was not repealed SO an inn
mediate sale Of mort XII gee lands could be
had. and * should be held that no an
praasesuenf MAS necessary. the safne 4 III
Guilty and Inconsistency would remain as
80 ordinary judgments rot constituting A
lien until a levy Is rad. and n m9rtgagea
lands must be appraised nd III Immediate
sale can be had under section So tns SON.
nrusa tom following right aAnag the period
OF rejeTupti would b. less than one year
The stature eri6eafiy meant to provide
cases whether the land was sojd under IN
ordinary Judgment CT mortg age or len
decree of foreclosure There - ~, rsa son
why an ordinary judgment creditor sh0uId
have such a preference over 4 mort gaEee
or Tnechanic seeking 10 enforce bis lien.
used IN section 3 ard estimate 'vaitf-
si0n' and aqprafsemnDr In s@csL0n T.
aad 'appEa4sesnsusf ard valuation in
section s, they must mean the same thing
baSaus. no such absurd result with ref
eEeEce 70 the period ~ redemption could
have. bssn intended Il the agpra isasrseFf as
mentioned In section Il ensy ayp plies TO the
further appraESe ynent provided for In se.-
ton s. and 30 apflrass~F8enf !r section 81
has reference 70 the estimates IN sections
ard 4 These est tuases are appyas So rg8cnfs
the app-ssss meats ct tbs parties. and *
may stop after either the Gr.t or ghe see-
ond estimate II the ether party is s8tis-
fed The AEssraiNerressg mentioned IA sess-
ssen 3 ts tae lnAa tpfsss@EHeFsf uriees fur
shsr proceedings are aa0 ssssfler sectioa 8
where The matter Stems 70 be finally and