The Manning times. [volume] (Manning, Clarendon County, S.C.) 1884-current, 1898-06-08

lee was then adopted as follows, only
Two uninportanI changes being made
OrangeDurg, Thursday, June 16.
ST.. Georges, Friday, June II.
Charleston, Saturday, June Is.
Walterboro, Monday, June 30.
Beaufort, Tuesday (n;ghU, June 81
Hampton, Wednesday, June %.
BArnwell, Fr.oay, Jane d
BAN berg, Saturday, June 25.
Sunler, tuesday, June %.
Manning, Wednesday, June 20.
Monks Corner, Tuesday, June so.
Georgetown, Saturday, July 3.
K!ngs.ree, Tuesday, July 5.
Florence, Wednesday, July 6.
Marion, Thursday, July z.
Conway, Saturday, July 9.
Darlington, Tuesday, July -
CaesteIf=lt, Thursday, July Il.
BennellsvilIe, Saturday, July 16.
BNnopViIle, Tuesday, Jlly l6.
Camden, Tnursaay, Jaly 81.
LaLcAsler Saturday, July %.
Caester, Monday, July 25.
Wlnnsooro, tuesday, July 70.
YorkgilIe, Wednesday, July 81.
Gafaey, Thursday, july %.
SpartanOurg, Fcldsy, July 20.
Union, Saturday, July SO.
New berry, MONDAY, August s.
Laurens. Tuesday, Angus. 9.
Greenvllle, Thursday, Angus. II.
Pickens, Friday, August II.
WalnalIs, Monday, august Is.
Anderson, Tuesday, August Is.
Abosv!lle, Thursday August IS.
Green Tood, Friday, August 10.
Aiken, MONDAY, Angus. %.
Easefe.d, Tuesday, August %
Saluos, Thursday. Angus! 25.
Lexington, Friday, August 26.
ColumUla, Saturday, Angus. 27.
THE TUG OF WAR.
Then came the tug OF war. Mr.
Blease presented 10 the committee ID,
following QUESTION from Mr.. Georgt
S. Mower OF NeWoerry, VINO was ask
ed by Inc prohlbIslonIs!s 10 be q can
didate on their llcke. for attorney
general:
"Wnether Or not the suggestion O
4 candidate by the recent prohibition
convenuon makes tie person VINO i
suggeeted and accepts q candidate II
the Democratic primary such as Is
forbidden BY lhe terms OF the pledge
prescribed oy The constitution Of tns
Democratic party OF this State. y
Mr.. AppelE took lhs position tha
acceptance OF the suggestion would eX
cIuce the candidate from the primary
ana quoted the party Constitution tc
sustain MS argument.
Mr. D0Galosou thought the commit
tee would commit g. grave error II
ans Herlng no 10 tas question anc
would be placing an catering wedgt
that would for all times be felt and
finally disrupt the party.
Mr.. Appel, replying, said that hi:
view OF Inc CONSTITUTION on the point
was that the rul9 vas adoD.ed for the
purpose OF executing factions within
the Democratic party and 10 pat doWn
strife; 10 prevent conventions naming
tickets. Tnece was no objection &c
any Prohlbit!onls5 entering the cam
palgn, provided nc had not accepted
the nomination o. any party.
Mr.. Williams was inclined to the
view OF Mr.. Appel!, but /! was 3 deli
cate point, AID as II was genraIy IN
derstocd that the former COMMITTEES
had ruled IN favor Of the Prchioilon-
ISIS on this point he thought tue clause
should be literally Constructed ano
ruled on in favor the Probibl.l0nists,
Tnen followed motions TO ans He.
Mr.. Mowers question thick aDd fast,
and aIItne members seemed 10 ta.k a
once. Chairman Jones was kepi
busy rapping for order. Motion wa:
made after motion, ant 3 genera
was the result.
\ TIE VOTE
F!uaIly Mr.. WluKIer moved !ha!
tie answer be No, he Will noI be d9
barred" An aye a0d nay vote was
taken and ce7eIoyed q tie. So The no
ton WAS lost.
Mr.. L J. Williams introduced tbs
following, which WAS adopted:
AS the nominee Of the Prohibition
faction, yes, ne is deDarred il ne IS ar
Individual Prohibition canciaate with
in the Democratic party, 20 he IS noj
de0arfet. "
Mr. Dial OF LIu:ens introduced the
following, Whicn wSs sisO adopted:
we Interpret the constitution a.
disp-oying fsctional nominations. but