The record-union., 1898-05-03
SUPREME COURT CALENDAR.
Cases to BE Heard at the Present
Session.

The People, etc, respondent, VS. Ting
Chung Duy appellant-Fresno County.
The People, ETC., respondent. VS.. Phelan
Wednesday, May 4th
Department One.)
Inc People, etc, respondent, VS.. Hfguera,
appellant-Los Angeles County.
The People, etc, respondent, VS.. De Carlo
~; ;appellant-Yolo County
Ine People, ETC., respondent, VS.. Streu-
Der, appellant-Transcript only.
Biggs, Jr., respondent VS.. Hatch & Rock
Orchard Company, ct al, appellants
| Butte County
Biggs. Jr, respondent, VS.. Hatch Sc Rock
Orchard Company. ct al, appellant
Butte County.
Brooks, respondent, VS. Johnson, ct al.
appeIlant-Butte County.
CHICO Bridge Company, respondent, VS.
Sacramento Transportation Company
appellant-Butte County.
Merry, ct al, respondent, VS. Brodt. appel
lant-Butte County.
Department Two.)
Porter. respondent, VS.. LasSen County l..
q c. Co, appellant-Lassen County
Estate of Healy, deceased-Lassen Coun-
The People. etc. appellant VS.. Smith, As
SCISSOR, etc, espondent-Modoc County.
Russell, respondent, VS.. Finley, ct al, ap-
pellant-Calaveras County.
Bank of Orland. appellant VS.. Finnell,
respondent-Glenn County.
lLathrop, respondent. VS.. Golden. appellant
Glenn County.
Brown, respondent, VS.. S. F. Savings I'm
ion. appellant-Glenn County.
Estate of Murdock, deceased-Glenn Coun-
ty.
Thursday. May 5th.
department One)
Seaman respondent, VS.. S. f. & S. ]. Val
. ley Ry. Co., appellant-San Joaquin,
Smith, appellant. VS.. Mason respondent
Lewis. appellant, VS.. Burns. ct al. re-
| spondent-San Joaquin County.
Benton, respondent, vs.. Benton. appellant
Shepherd appellant VS. Keagleu Auditor
| etc. respondent-San Joaquin
Cal. Navigation and Imp. Co, appellant,
! vs. Union Transportation Co., respond
! ent-San Joaquin
Croker. ct al, appellant. VS.. Cunning
ham, Sheriff, ETC.. respondent-San Joa-
Richards appellant, VS.. Fraser, ct al, re-
| Spondent-San Joaquin.
Department Two)
The People, ETC., respondent. VS.. Hill, ap-
The People. etc, respondent. VS.. Boo Doc
-, Hong, appellant Tehama.
The People, etc, appellants, VS.. Beach, ct
| al, reSpondent-San Joaquin.
Powers, respondent VS.. May Treasurer,
! etc, appellant-Tulare
Twohy, appellant, VS.. Woods, ct al. re-
S. F. Savings Union, respondent VS.. Lee,
! ct al, appeIlant-Tulare County
Hofsinger, respondent, VS.. Goldman, ct al.
slinkard. Jr, respondent, VS.: Manchester
! Fire Ins. Co. appellant-Tulare
frlday, May 6th.
Department One)
| White, respondent, VS.. Southern Pacific
! Co., Apprehension Joaquin.
Smith, respondent. VS.. Smith, appellant
McRae, administrator, ETC., respondent,
vs.. Argonaut L. & D. Co. appellant
San Joaquin.
Humphrey, appellant VS.. Pope, respond
siskiyou L. & NJ. Co. respondent VS..
-Rostel, appellant-siskiyou County,
! q ItFlr 11,+ TF7rtr
al. appellant -Siskiyou.
Rohrer, executor ETC., respondent, VS..
Babcock, appellent.
! henderson, respondent, VS.. Hart, appel
lant-Tehama
! Department Two)
McCabe, respondent, VS.. Jeffords, Auditor.
etc, appellant-Tulare.
iBlankenship, appellant, VS.. Whaley. ct al,
| reSpondent-Tulare.
Garthwaite ct al, executor, etc. appel
| liant, VS.. Bank Of Tulare. respondent
S. F. & S. j. Valley Ry. Co, respondent,
! vs.. Gould. ppellant-Tulare.
! Irish respondent, VS.. Sundershaus, appel
Myers. respondent VS.. sina Valley S. &
A, ct al, appellant-sierra.
| Brennan, respondent, VS.. Brennan, admx.,
etc. appellant-Sierra.
! Bennett, appellant, VS.. Wilson, ct al, re-
| spondent-Plumas
Monday, May 9th.
Department One.)
! jHillman, appellant, VS.. Griffin. respondent
| Sacramento.
Hodson, respondent. VS.. varney, appellant
Glare, respondent. vs. Sacramento Elec.
L. & p Co.. appellant-Sacramento
Howe. appellant, VS.. Halsey respondent
Thomson-H Houston Elec. Co., appellant VS..
! Central Electric Ry. Co., respondent
| Sacramento.
Broder ct al, appellant, VS.. Conklin, ct
| al. espondent-Mono County.
Broder ct al, appellant, VS.. Conklin, ct
al. respondent Mono County.
| Toland. etc, respondents, VS.. Toland, ct
| al, ppellant-Soano County.
Department Two.)
McFalI, respondent vs.. Buckeye Grang-
Bank of Woodland, respondent, VS.. Heron.
! ct al, appellant-Yolo County.
| Coward, respondent, VS.. Clanton. appel
McNear appellant. VS.. Bourn, ct al, re-
| spondent-Yolo County.
! Ball. eft al. respondent, VS.. Putnam, ct
/ AL appellant-Yolo County.
Estate of Slade. deceas ased-Yolo County.
Reclamation District No: 537, respondent,
! VS.. Burger, ct al, appellant-Yolo Coun-
Flint, appellant, VS. Lovedal. ct al. re-
Tuesday, May 10th.
Department One.)
Longley, respondent, vs. Rodriguez, appel
! lant-Kings County.
Bank of Lemoore, respondent. VS.. Gu1art,
ct al. appellant-Kings County.
Alferitz, appellant, VS.. Perkins. respond
| ent-Madera County.
Ambrose, appellant, VS.. Barnett ct al,
! espondent-Madera County.
Bailey, respondent, VS.. Johnson, ct al, ap-
| pellant-Sacramento.
| Davis. appellant VS.. Green, respondent
| MADEIRA County.
Com'I Bank of MADEIRA, VS.. Redfeld, ct al.
| Observation-Disclosures County.
| County of Colusa. appellant VS.. Welch,
! espondent-Colusa County.
The People ex rel, etc. appellant. VS..
Jefferds, ct al, espondent-Yuba Coun-
Department Two)
| Elliott, assignee, ETC., respondent, vs..
| Warfed, Sheriff, etc., appellant-Mer-
ced County.
spondent-Merced County.
Kelsey. appellant. VS.. Merced County, re-
| spondent-Merced County.
! Nelson, appellant, VS.. Merced County, re-
| spondent-Merce County.
Shaffer. appellant, vs. Merced County. re-
spondent-Merced County.
Haley, appellant, VS.. Merced County, re-
spon,dent-Merced County.
Camp, ct al. appellant, VS.. Land, respond
ent-Sacramento.
The People. ex rel, ETC., appellants, VS..
Natl Bank of D. o. Mills & Co.. re-
! spondent-Sacramento
| Kocher, Observation-Disclosures County.
Wednesday, May 18th.
Department One.)
Cline. respondent, VS.. Robbins, appellant
| Nevada County.
Vincent, respondent. VS.. Collins. assignee,
ct al, ppellant-Nevada County.
! Tilley, appellant VS. Bonney, ct al, re-
| spondent-Nevada County.
Bonney, admx, ETC., appellant. VS.. Tilley,
espondent-Nevada County.
Stonesifer, ct al, appellant, vs. Kilburn,
| eft al, respondent-Stanislaus County.
| Dickey. appellant VS.. Gibbon, ct al, re-
| spondent-Stanislaus County.
Wilson. respondent VS.. Donaldson, ct a.,
appellant-Sacrament
Department Two.)
Estate of Byrne, decea ased-Placer County.
] Dir nnrnnl1ant