Frostburg mining journal. [volume] (Frostburg, Md.) 1871-1913, 1898-11-19

Samuel Bowen. Emily Bowen, his wife,
John Richardson ct al.
TNHE object of this SUIT is to procure a de-
L cree for the sale of certain real estate stu
ate N Frostburg, Allegany county, and State
of Maryland, and to divide the proceeds
thereof among the parties entitled thereto.
The Bill states that certain Elizabeth
Bowen, the widow Of William Bowen, late of
said Ailegany county, departed this life in
testate some time during the year 1896, seized
and possessed OF certain real estate lying in
Frostburg, Allegany county, and State of
Maryland, which is described in deed from
Nelson Beall and others to the said William
Bowen and Elizabeth Bowen, his wife, bear
ing date of the 10th day of September, 1869
and recorded among the Land Records of
Allegany county in Liber No. 80. folio 164
That the said Elizabeth Bowen left surviv-
ing heirs-at-law, to wit:
(a)-Elzabeth, daughter, who intermar-
ried first with John James, now deceased
and afterwards with - Sampson, also de-
ceased, and resides in Jasper county, in the
State of Missouri.
(b)-Fannie, daughter, who intermarried
with one Benson K. Hartzell, both of whom
reside IN Hamilton county, i'll the State of
Ohio.
NJ-hiiHlC, udtiSIltI, VINO
with Madison Gunnett, both residents of
Frostburg, Allegany county, Maryland
(d)-Thomas, a son, who intermarricd with
Jane Bowen, both residents of Usage county,
in the State of Missouri.
(ei-James, a son, who intermarred with
Mary Ann Bowen, both residing at Frostburg
aforesaid.
J)-JOhn ", a son, who married Sophia
Bowen, both of whom reside at trostburg
aforesaid.
(g)-George w son, intermarred with
Sarah Bowen, both resident in Frostburg
aforesaid.
W)-Clara, a daughter, who intermarried
with Frank Sheet, both of whom reside at
Oakland, Garrett county, i'll the State of
Maryland.
G)-Charlotte daughter, who married
John Richardson, both residents of Frost
burg aforesaid.
O)-Samuel, son, who intermarried with
said Emily Bowen residents of Frostburg.
(D-Annie Rosser, wife of - Rosser. res
idents of the State of Kansas; Elizabeth
Erickson, the wife of Carl Erickson, residents
OF Usage city, in the State of Kansas; Eliza
Oliver, the wife of William E. Oliver, residing
at Emporia, in the State of Kansas Harriet
Lay:nla Jones, unmarried, and William
Jones, unmarried both residents of FrOStburg
aforesaid, all being children of a certain Har-
ret Bowen, daughter of said Elizabeth
Bowen, whointermarried with certain John
Jones, and departed this life prior to the death
of the said Elizabeth Bowen, and all grand
children of the said Elizabeth Bowen.
(D-William Bowen, Benjamin Bowen, and
Eva Bowen, all unmarried, residing at Scran-
ton, in the State of Pennsylvania who are
all the children Of one Benjamin Bowen, a
son of SAID Elizabeth Bowen, who intermar-
ried with a certain Laura V. Williams and
died in the year 1881, and the grandchildren
of the said Elizabeth Bowen.
That all of the parties are adults above the
age of tWenty-one years except the said Har-
riet Lavinia Jones' Eva Bowen and BENJAMIN
Bowen, who are infants under the age of
twenty years.
That the real estate mentioned in the Bill
and exhibits is not susceptible of partition
without material loss and injury to the par
ties having interests therein, and that to
make division thereof it will be necessary to
sell the same and divide the proceeds thereof
among those entitled.
The Bill then prays for decree for the sale
of said real estate and a division of the pro-
ceeds; for subpnnaS against the resident de-
PENDANTS and for an order of publication
against the nonresident defendants and for
general relief.
1t is thereupon, This 25th day of October,
1895 by the Circuit Court for Allegany coun-
ty, sitting as Court of Equity
ORDERED And DECREED, That the
cOmplainants, by causing "A copy of this order
to be- inserted in some newspaper published
in said Allegany county once in each of four
successive weeks BEFORE the Goth day of
November, 1898, give notice to the said
nonresident defendants of the object and sub
stance of this Bill, and warning them to APP
pear i'll this Court, either in person or by so
lctor ON or BEFORE the 18th day of
December, 1898, to show cause if any
they have, why decree ought not to be
passed as prayed. DAVID W. SLOAN.
True copy-Test:
Oct D-4tl THEo. LUMAN, Clerk.