The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1898-09-22
Peddicord-HamiIl.

! stfews; Peddicord-Hamill
~, N. Nathan, admir-, VS.. D.
Smouse; Thayer -Hamill.
\ 40, Mrs. c. r. Hoyes VS.. T. w. Gas
tSei; Mitchell Hamiu.
3g, A. N. Cunningham VS.. S. Y.
Davis; Peddicord- Hamill.
bl, II. Y. Wotring VS.. County Com
nissioners; Peddicord- -Sincell.
~, Martha Wotring VS.. County
commissioners; Peddicord-Sincell.
70, J. S. Silcox VS.. A. Townshend;
eddicord-Hamill.
The following cases have been de-
termined and disposed of:
TRIALS.
NO. 10, |. Leighton VS.. H. b. Lewis
y Bro; verdict for plaintiff and dam
ages assessed at $132 and costs; Thay-
er. Sincell-Hamill.
10, Henry Weber VS.. w. Broderick
and wife; trespass, trial begun before
sse court but leave given to plaintiff
70 amend pIafs; Hamili, Thayefs-
Semmes, Mitchell.
%. c. G. Groves VS.. County Com
missioners of Washington county; re-
moved from Washington county; set
tied, defendant to pay plaintiff $4,000;
Schley, Peddicord-Hamill.
No. 26, NJ. j. Wabell VS.. J. B. Bantz;
Judgment extended for plaintiff, $40;
Peddicord.
81, Eli Mclean VS.. John Kitzmiller;
tried before the court; Judgment for
plaintiff for 1925; Hamill, Semmes-
PeddicOrd
so, w. Tichell VS.. w. II. Barnard;
dismissed; Hamill.
81, Mccoy VS.. c. F. White; judg-
ment on the rule, $274.15; Hamill
80, p T. Cartwright VS.. James
Kerns; judgment on rule for $26465;
Hamill-Kerns.
40, Davis & Son VS.. S. f. kimmell;
judgment on the rule for $144.45.
AZ, j. d. Lippold VS.. a. Shartzer;
garnishee, Judgment on rule; Hamill
-Sincell.
45, j. E. Rexroad VS.. D. McMinn,
garnishee, Judgment for $2O.51; no at
torneys.
Al, Aushutz B. & Co. VS.. E. B. w.
Ryland and others; judgment on rule;
Hamill.
"a, Mary E. Engle VS.. J. S. Broad
water, settled; defendant to pay costs;
Sincell-HamiIl
55, g. w. Engle VS.. j. S. Broad
water; settled; defendant to pay costs;
Sincell-Hamill.
10, Burton, Hale & Co. VS.. W. Ry-
land Co; Judgment on rule for STA IS,
Hamill.
so, Burton, Hale & Co. VS.. S. Thomas;
Judgment on rule for S4O.68; Hamill
So, g. S. Hamill VS. F. r. Nethken
ct al; judgment on rule for $26752;
Hamill.
81, Geiser Mfg Co. VS.. J. L. Nc
Robbie; judgment on rule for $586S;
Hamill
SS, Same VS.. j. A. Baldwin; judg-
ment on rule for $65.20
SO, Same VS.. Henry Paugh; judg-
ment on rule for $G520; Hamill.
80, Same VS.. J. /. McRobie ct al; ;
judgment on rule, $62 20; Hamill.
81, T. W. Frost VS.. L. A. Yommer;
Judgment on rule, $14597.
93, Hannach Bros. VS.. Clark s. Nc
Cullough; judgment on rule.
"a, A. F. & J. w. Horner VS.. w. s.
Pew; judgment on rule.
95. Alice Riley VS.. j. A. Friend;
Judgment on rule; $26G95.
81, j. w. Broadwater VS.. Jemima
Mowery; tried before the court; judg-
ment for plaintiff for $144.50; Hamill
-Renninger.
9S, Novelty Mill Co. VS.. H. +. Felty;
Judgment on rule.
1O3, Davis & Son VS.. H. NJ. Fred
lock; Judgment on rule, $144.45;
Thayer.
104, Same VS.. r. S. Jamison; judg
ment on rule, $144.45; Thayer.
106, w. T. Allen g. Co. VS.. G. T.
West; judgment on rule, $18S35;
Hamill--Peddicord
107, G.. g. Latchford VS.. NJ. E. Gar
rett ct al; dismissed.
108, G. s. Hamill VS.. w. J. Sanders;
referred to counsel; Hamill-Peddi-
cord
100, Shattuck & Jackson VS.. G. 7.
West; judgment on rule, $145,41;
Hamill-Peddicord
On Monday morning the court took
up the criminal docket and up to the
time of going to press the following
cases have been disposed of:
CRIMINAL TRIALS.
No. 1, State VS.. Charles Mosser
assault and battery; jury trial; YER
dict not guilty; Thayer-Hamill.
2, State VS.. Clark & McCullough
continued; Thayer-Hamill.
3, State VS.. same; continued; Thayel
-Hamill.
4, State VS.. 7. Cushleg; plea OF