The Independent. [volume] (Honolulu, H.I.) 1895-1905, 1898-06-29
Continued from LIST page.)


aforesaid, which was accordingly
done as aforesaid. And these defend
ants say that said deed was recorded
for the express purpose OF making
said deed of immediate force and
effect and OF publishing the same to
the world as an authoritative con-
veysnce from plaintiff to defendants,
and Immediately thereafter the de-
PENDANTS advertised in the public
press ia the Hawaiian and English
languages in said Honolulu to the eff
feet that claims against the plaintiff
should be- presented forthwith to
the defendants and that all rents
accruing from the estate aforesaid
covered by the deed aforesaid be
paid thereafter to the defendants,
and these defendants cay that the
plaintiff was aware OF said advertise
ments and approved of them.
Furthermore, defendants say that
after the execution of said deed the
defendants from time to time ex-
ecuted and delivered new leases to
tenants of portions OF the estate
aforesaid covered by said deed, and
that plaintiff was we'll aware of the
execution of said leases, and that
defendants never heretofore exec
uted leases as aforesaid, the defend
ant David Kawananakoa having
signed several leases for her and in
her name and by her express sanction
Heretofore, whereas subsequent to
the making Of said deed the said
leases we're executed by the defend
ants in their own names and as OF
their own right with the knowledge
and acquiesence of plaintiff.
Furthermore, defendants say that
the plaintiff has been paid by the
defendants her monthly allowance
of one thousand dollars since said
deed and as provided therein and
that plaintiff has receipted for the
first two months ALLOWANCE thereof
and has executed receipts therefor,
receiving and receipting for the
same as allowance under said deed.
Furthermore, defendants allege
and say by way of answer to the
paragraphs aforesaid in said bill
last hereinabove named, that pursn.
ant to the terms OF said deed they
have paid and discharged all out
standing Indebtedness of the plaintiff
other than that secured by the
mortgage deed to A. S. Wilcox, out
of funds other than those forming a
part of the estate conveyed to de-
PENDANTS as aforesaid, said obligations
amounting to some five thousand
dollars. And these defendants say
that plaintiff has been made aware
OF the payment offs said bills pursuant
to the terms o. said deed and that
plaintiff after the execution of said
| deed requested that said bills be
paid pursuant to the terms OF said
deed and by virtue OF the terms
thereof, and when defendants COM
piled with said request and produced
the receipted bills plaintiff remarked
that defendants must have borrowed
money or mortgaged portion of the
property to have paid said bills.
Furthermore, the defendants say
that after the execution OF said deed
and by virtue of the immediate
ownership Of the property set forth
in said deed created thereby the de-
PENDANTS effected $4,000 worth OF
insurance upon certain buildings
and personal property forming a
part of the estate conveyed by the
deed aforesaid, and that said poll
cies were made out in the names Of
defendants as the absolute owners
thereof; that the defendants inform
ed plaintiff OF what they had
done and plaintiff asked to see the
policies, which request was complied
with and that plaintiff examined
said policies and was aware that de-
PENDANTS had insured the said pro-
perty as their own, and expressed no
disapproval of said action.
Furthermore, defendants state
that on the 1st of April of this year,
they presented to plaintiff a state
ment Of the payments made by de-
PENDANTS for and in behalf of plain
tiff's current expenses for two
preceding months, defendants
having paid the same on account
Of the instructions OF plaintiffs
physician that she, the plaintiff,
should not be bothered by business
of any kind, defendants making pay
ment of the monthly allowance Sc
cured to plaintiff by said deed by
settling OF all of her current ex-
penses and current bills aud pay
ment OF the balance in coin.
And defendants further show aud
state that on said LIST day of April
the plaintiff stated to the defendant
j. Kalanianaole that she preferred
that her monthly allowance under
said deed be paid to her in coin and