Daily capital journal. (Salem, Or.) 1896-1899, 1898-11-01

rendered Judgment against the State
Board OF Agriculture, In the case
wherein NJ. V. Rays sued that body
upon warrants issued 10 his favor for
ib0r perfJrmed and goods furnished
during the past year. The state
board failed TO appear In court, after
its demurrer was oYerruled, evidently
declining 10 plead further. Messrs.
Brown, Myers and Wrlghtman, the
new law firm win their first suit and
get Judgment for S205 on three war
rants, and there is no reason why
all warrants against the State Fair
cannot be collected.
In the state fair board suit Atty.
Gen. Idleman madea hard fight. 1t
was the first time he had ever appeared
10 a Salem justice court. 1t had been
supposed that he would not conde-
scend to appear 10 any court but the
srpTeme court, or a circuit court, and
counsel for plaintiff noted that
this was the first appearance OF so
high law officer In justice court.
1t seems IL was dead horse case out
OF which no private lawyer could
extract state fee.
A STRONG TEAM.
The Attorney General found ths
new law firm hot stuff. HON.. NBrown
who has been In the legislature several
times but Ia now out OF politics, prac-
tlced ten years In Eastern Oregon aud
year at Hlllsboro. He is a we'll
posted counsellor and enjoys a reputa-
tlon as a fighter ln court for his client.
Frank Wrlghtman, for ten years
connected with the sherlff's Office, has
the most thorough legal knowledge Ia
his field Of any man in Marion covnty.
This is the only lawhrm In town
with pure blonde-the red headed
member being Jefferson Myers, who
has a wide experience Ia legislation
and public affairs. The client who
gets this new team TO pull for him
Yill find he can pillow straight deep
furrow.
ANOTHER NEW LAWYER WINS.
la the case OF George f. Rodgers
against the Northwestern Stove
Foundry, Nc answer was made by the
defendant aud Judgment was entered
: 10 favor OF plaintiff for sl28,3l.
. Edward Horgan, the young practic-
, Ing attorney also won this his first
= suit In court, Young Horgan is a
> close legal student and rustler.
u DEPARTMENT NO. 2.
Following are the docket entries
- made by Judge Boise during the
day:
Il. M. Eberhart, insolvent, A.. y.
Condlt, assignee, assignment; contin-
ued.
Schuyler Rue, insoyent, j. Il. II. B.
Brentano assignee, ASST lInment; con-
tlnued.
David Scott, insolvent, Alfred
n Bardsley, assignee. assignment; con-
n tinued.
II. N. Salisbury, insolvent, A, N,
!. Bush, assignee, assignment order
Z confirming final report and discharg-
a ing assignee.
Freeman Arnold, lnsolvent, #. j..
q Bolter, assignment; continued.
4 Iver Larson, insolvent, A. Magill,
assignee, assignment; II appearing
from the petition that the claim OF
y Coolidge & McClalne has been fled, IL
is ordered that the same IL not a
claim against the insolyert.
. Lyman ID. Hall VS.. George w. Water
bury ct al, motion for sheriff's deed;
: order granted.
Leo. Willis, insolYent, NJ. l.. Cham
berlin, assignee, order TO dlsburse
: i2i per cent, on claims; continued.
e w. r. Swlnk VS.. John Leedy ct al,
confirmation OF sale, sale confirmed.
Enterprise Lumber Co., insolYent.
q. E. Hawkins, assignee, assignment;
ordered that assignee tle a report
+ within ten days.
Cora A. Whorley vs.. Albert Ii.
} Whorley, divorce; dismissed without
iudice.
w, II. Holmes, administrators, vs..
Mary Apple, equity; dismissed as
per stipulation.
II, Il. West, insOlvent, j. w, Pate,
assignee, assignment; order granted
20 sell property at private sale,
j. N. Turnb0w US. Della l., Turn
tow, divorce; default, continued,
E. II, Osborn, insolvent, jefferson
, Myers, assignee, assignment; stricken
from the docket.
j, ID. Shaw ct al vs.. Prudence Gray
ct al; dismissed.
Nancy S, Belle ct al, vs. Charles A,
Brown, equity; set for Friday at 8 a.
m.
John Lemacher VS., Katherine lie.
macher, divorce; trial set for Weines-
day at ga. m.
Alex Huston VS., Fannie H. Huston
divorce; at issue; trial set for We'd
nesday at 3 p. m.
W. II. Fear VS.. Thomas j. Hunt ct
al, equity, sale confirmed.
Lucy A, Adams vs., Wm. Adams
divorce; default,
| VIM. McMasters vs., John Rayoard
ct al, equity; defaults served by pub
llcatlon; decree OF foreclosure.
I w. p. Lord ct al, vs.. owen ct al,
foreclosure; dismissed
w. p, Lord ct lal. VS.. Edgar Grim,
foreclosure; default as 90 all defend
decree OF foreclosure,