The times. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1890-1903, 1898-09-24

sv.r suryested that he might 50 onJ
Tho defendant then said be had Il physl-
cal trouble ana it was OF such a nature
that he could not talk 60 Miss Coleman
about IT, ! saw Miss Coleman only
TO-, b,,,rq ON thls visit lie said. wrote
49,. I.t..r ~ Anril tth. the letter was
v.r.tf,o because of the trouble l had and
.i. doctor had told mo was not in amy
condition 10 get married This doctor
v.s D- Hubbard DIT Preaka had been
...t... ca, hrfore this This was the
t,s tsfto9 ,yith Dr. Hubbard.
,,,.. ,-oi.c,sn ths, wrote for an cxplaul-
....f .t-rf-a that the only
H'" "' .rf ..t.. ,r,s that I had
cApI""-li'" d 900" '.. -, .,.,.f,,,o the
been ADVISED pl ao~.'' ,,.,st.
marriage Mf OBJ. Was ~ -t.,,.r
ponenent and no'hins g.'-' ,.,i.,,.t.,,. ana
came Co see me mo ti"'5 -t.- ,bIs
seemed 10 o' l"iiy ,,.r,f. an
one or two letters p's''" -',' ,..., 1.-
April ttn, ASKING u-t 10 b., tl,is
cause J. was SIGN "t" & af+,..tvy,
/ letter but eAp--'cl '''.' rl....,,,s
years OLD, VIII 1e "i'5 d.. ,n.rrioJ
made some arfanf cni.i'' D
Oil the 9th. ] bought Jay o".'. 90.
Miss Coleman and 1'r m"lHpI '"." 80
III. courtroom and the eA'ini'iA'.'" o'
| Nr. Sanders relative to bis pnNfi. 'i"'-
bic becan. re s1l1. was u'- a''N '',
! Z .rraeod myself I Was tihen anout
/ tbo f,sr. of March. ] suffered very mneh
! with my bladder. Dr. Ireak.e urea l-u me-
| I have not gotten well yct nave AtF',
hboen in bed from it and never a',p'-N
l.eoins about. Mr. Sanders was tleh tui"-
I,.I o,.,- to the plaintiff attorneys.
i r4o .e4fd Z first asked Dr. Hubbard ABOUT
| Co.. rr.r OF Apru We were ON drive
t,..-rar o1 business when J asked him.
! count haro took recess Tor one hour
/ So c,,fors v,as cross examined as 10
-,..,.ors.fi,, had during recess with
| Dr hubbard and stated s. only related
to the time OF DAY they tetIrneu I'm ON
n business trip when Doe A1d consulted yea
! him Tie stated that Dr. IreaH-e i-.lI
/ t-o4fcd him about "a week when no COM
/ suited Dr. Hubbard. u'u ".f~'
! toned t0 Dr. lreak.e thal j WIS '"7
/ Doe married. Why was d. WAS d.N,' D'
/ the plaintiffs attorney, you @aN.N
| Hubbard about being married ana y'..
| trouble and dld nor an III, l-s-..i,..,
J had been treating your ne r1'' '.'s
| said "I did not ask Dr. ulDD"iu D'-
! mentioned ". ana ne a'lo 80
| condition TO marry sho. AN 40, %
! postpone the marriage Qua "'' ~
cu Tho drive with l)r. lilp1AtN 20
nfs advice: but the conversation came up
/ arl I told hlm how I was INJECTED anu "t
| made the remark nave spoken or } o.1
n
/ DO impress 5ion from tne Doc.oI ~ ~
when I would be cuFea 49, ,,.,,
/ some bladder trouble. The oe-endant was
examined no some lehs.n .o6 VIE
| when suddenly ins p."'''...s ,t,,-.
| wero sent for by the pidli-"i' az , -
| timo the Judge was Sent TOT anu '|
the anticipation OF the crown ''Nl -,
| promise had been re'cI.-n, ' ,',-,is, ~
| expected me mHti'17a o - ,h,r mia
| tiis suit. However it ,,,,1 nd
| was bug ruWoI. o,- 't.,..,,. ,s,r the
bee settled ana '"1 'C,-,,tn,t,on Of
! piainun conuhueu '"o
| the defendant ..... % b,c fro
The defendant slA'.I go 49, In. the
| Qu9ut talks with bf. tiu, D-' ,.,-,'i NJ,
| month OF April, ana ne hal d. 49, 49, 49,
! and tho marriage had uceh p's 'po... -,
| cause OK his advice. old iol W. ~
! OIL tho letters. nor ola sigh ,i'''' ,,,,.
| had .this done by @ friend OK mime. "e
examination reiause 70 wy 10y, s.,,, r,-
| resumed and MISS coleman was s.-
The first letter SHOWN u- ~ ~.
was the one tho piaIh''ls ',''' ,-..fTs
the contract. and me ue,'''''"'
It was not. lt Is as io"o~9' ,..u. "a
White stone d., Api 80,
Dear Miss 1erIu"e .,.,.h have M
that clrcumslaIl~1' 49, 80, lesoioc my
| cpHtioi WI" go - .bfs month
promise on the zitn OF li.'9
| Trusting you VIII pdtD"" NV
j remain yours, exc. ,..-,>,.rs
~ - -.t.. a., 4.