The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1898-11-23
THE COURT RECORD.
supreme Court.


1925 Union, etc, Association VS.. Helberg.
Lake c. c. Reversed. Hackney, IA COM
plant TO foreclose d mechanics lien must
be filed within one year from the date the
notice is Med. and a foreclosure of sucn
lien which is prior TO a mortgage without
making the mortgage holder a party does
not estop such party from afterwards as
sorting the nvalidity of the mechanics lien.
1883. Markley VS.. Studabaker. Wells &. g.
Affirmed on the authority of 1885, decided
this term of court Jordan, j.
1889. Myers VS.. Cullum. Carroll c. c. At
firmed. Monks, il. Where a deed of con-
veyanee contains the following provision,
to-Wit: This deed being made to A. W.
c., son of r. w. c., the said r. w. G. is
to have his support off of said described land
during his natural life, the said Z. ". =.
received a life estate in the real estate de-
scribed in said deed.
1859. Coburn, etc. Company vs. Union,
ETC., Association. Lake c. c.. Afhrmed.
a mechanics lien and the latter is foreclosed
the procedure in foreclosure as TO the
former is a nullity and the realtion or such
liens to each other are in no wise adJudl-
Gated and if the year for foreclosure ex-
pires without having foreclosed sucn me
chanic's lien as against junior mortgage
the priority over the mortgage is loSt.
1880. Coburn, etc, Company VS.: Union,
authority of 1889. Howard, j.
1896 National Bank VS.. Henry. pehalp
c. C. Publication ordered and Issued.
Appellate Court.
2s74. Pierce VS. Pierce. Montgomery Q. c.
Affirmed. Henley, c. J.--Where widow dles
before her statutory allowance is PAID from
the estate of her deceased husband her al
ministrator is entitled to recover the same
in the absence of an express provision IN
the will Of the deceased husband to the con-
2I1i. U. S. Express Company VS.. Hammer.
Marion c. C. Affirmed. Wiley, J.-Where
goods are shipped by express ana c9nS y. ne
duty of the carrier to deliver the goods 70
whom consigned regardless OF the refusal refusal
of the person in whose care tney d f sSht ~
to receive them, and in case OF reIusal ~ ~
deliver on demand the owner may secure
them by replevin.
Room flames NJ. feathers, Judge.
Thorp Block Savings and Loan Association
vs Albert r.. Tucker ct al; foreclosure OF
mortgage. Dismissed by plaintiff ana costs
paid. 60. -,
peal from c. A. Clark, ]. p. Cause dls-
missed by plaintiff; judgment against PLAIN
u Bruce lp5 Sherwood VS.. Clara NJ BerTyman
ct al Dismissed by plamllh' judgment
against plaintiff for costs.
Room s-Vinson Carter, Judge.
Francis Mueller VS.. Oscar Mueller; dI-
vorce. Evidence heard and taken under ao-
'i Minnie Plummer ct al. VS.. Thomas, P.
Shufelton ct al; to quiet title. On trial by
court.
Henry Clay Allen, Judge.
Charles P. Fisher ct al VS. William Me
meyer ct AL. foreclosure of lien. AS per
agreement of settlement of parties nice -,
Judgment against defendant Niemeyer for
costs rr,s,,,,.
William Niemeyer VS.. Charles +. Flsner
ct ali: appeal from justice of the peace. by
Agreement of parties, Judgment against
p'f Harry 3. Burnett ct AL VS. Peter G. Wey-
enberg; appeal from justice OF the peace.
I3y agreement of parties judgment against
defendant for $3.50 and costs, tror,
Gilmer Brag VS.. Joseph ScnWarLZ, AL aS,i
Hendricks county. Submitted to court; evil
dence heard.
New Suits Filed.
Daniel S. Michael VS.. Edward McConnell
ct al; suit on note. Superior Court, Room /.
Fannie b Danport VS.. George H. Dan
mort. eIlit for divorce Superior Court,
FIizabeth r. Jones VS.. William d. Jones;
divorce Superior Court, Room z.