The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1898-02-25

and for hire keeps and stores the goods of
others. and only such corporations are
authorized by the law under which they are
organized TO carry OH the business OF ware
houseman can avail themselves of the pro-
visions of the act of 1875 (acts 1875, r. 112)
as amended by the act of 1879 (acts 1879, p.
Z3U) .. Receipts which purpOrt to be ware
house receipts issued by a company not au-
thorized to carry on q warehouse business
do not give the holder thereof lien on
the property described therein. Z The
statute governing public warehOusemen
TO issue warehouse receipts on his own
property as security for debt. s. Only by
chattel mortgage duly acknowledged and
recorded can the owner OF personal prop
erty give another a lien upon it which can
be enforced against any person except the
parties thereto. 8. A trustee for creditors
is not a party to any assignment OF per-
sonal property by way of mortgage made
by the assignor within the meaning Of Sec
ton 6633 Burnss r. s. 1894
1855. Bedford Stone Company VS.. O'Brien.
Lawrence c. c. Affirmed. Howard, G. j.
/ In order for mere formal defects IN a
special verdict to be available on a motion
venire de novo it should appear that the
trial court had an opportunity to correct
any such errors by sending the jury back
to make such corrections. 2. In an action
for damages for personal injuries received
in operating machinery where the plaintiff
negligence on the part of the defendant,
and that the injury was received while in
the line of his duty the defendant is liable
Appellate Court.
1887 Lowenthal VS.. Grand Lodge. Van
derburg s. c. Affirmed. Black, J.-Where
benefit society and by the rules of the
ciety the members under a certain age
could designate certain beneficiaries, in
action by assumed beneficiaries TO collect
the endowment fund the plaintiff should
show that the deceased was of the proper
age to make a declaration of benetciarles
upon which his rights are based.
2370 City of Frankfort VS.. Coleman.
Clinton G. C. Affirmed. Robinson, G. j.
l. When territory becomes annexed to a
city highway previously established re-
mains the same. and the city, by bringing
the highway within the corporate limits and
leaving it open for public travel, becomes
bound to keep it in an ordinarily and rea-
sonably safe condition for travel. 2. The
verdict of jury will not be disturbed where
Brown Knox c, c. Appellee petitions for
rehearing
PISS Dressler VS.. Citizens street-railroad
Company. Morgan c.. c. Petition for re-
hearing overruled.
256. Wilson VS.. the State. Marion Grim.
c. Petition for rehearing overruled.
2449. Citizens Street-railroad Company
VS.. Union Trust Company Putnam c. G.
Petition to reinstate overruled.
23S9 Heal VS.. Niagara Oil Company.
Wells c. G. Transferred to Supreme Court.
1880. Forgy. vs.. Harvey, Cass G. G.
Transferred to Supreme Court.
2402 Board of Commissioners VS.. Fraser.
Benton c. c. Appellant petitions for re-
Superior Court.
Room John L. McMaster, Judge.
Asa Eden VS.. City of Indianapolis; dam
ages On trial by jury
Room 2-Lawson M. Harvey, Judge.
Ada Raper VS.. Major Taylor; damages.
On trial by jury.
John ]. Kreutzer ct al. VS.. Henry Brill:
replevin. Dismissed by plaintiff and costs
Room 3-vinson Carter, Judge.
The Wellsville Pioneer Pottery Company
VS.. Henry Brill; replevin. Dismissed and
costs paid.
oliver E. Sloan, administrator. VS.. Joseph
Louder ct al; replevin. On trial by jury
Circuit Court.
Henry Clay Allen, Judge
Sadie Hanneman VS.. Arthur N. Wilson,
appealed. Damages for failure to satisfy
mortgage. Jury returned verdict for plain
tiff for $50.
James n. Crabb VS. Oscar j. Ensley; ac-
count. Dismissed by plaintiff and costs paid
State ex rel. Clara Fivecoat VS.. John
Bramlet; bastardy. Submitted to court. evi-
dence heard, finding for relatrix and judg-
ment VS.. defendant for $500 and costs.
Martha Wright VS.. Mary HATS estate
On trial by jury.
New Suits Filed.
Indiana Bond Company VS.. John w. Me-
ginniss ct al; street lien. Superior Court
Henry c. Greening VS. Sarah j. Rhodes
ct al suit to foreclose lien. Superior Court,
Ann Names VS. Clark B. Jennings ct al
Superior Court, Room 8.
Lewis Jones VS.. the Hoosier Canning Ma
chinery Company, suit on contract Supe-
Julia A. RoIter VS.. Edna M. Hirst ct al.
mechanics lien. Superior Court, Room J.
Mary c. Laford VS. Norbert Laford, suit
for divorce. Circuit Court.
Thomas Bond VS.. Louisa May Fields;
damages. Superior Court, Room 2.