The sun., 1898-06-24
CHARGE lO TIE JURY
Continued Frosa Page One.


minister u the gospel. aLd wIASt he RI! ]
resss bssseen him and his conscience.
/ hage nsaising " sag, repsat, against
hin. bgt Gentlemen Oi the jury the min
ists.rs 0f Dyger are pG trying tilts ezar
and yOa ave.
.Tzlk ab<,th q reasonable dyakf. -ay
torn II around he Gber way. there il no
reasonable doltt. and contend thai by
the testimony a witnesses have clearly
proven that this defendant bad 10 IN
teinion Oi defra1ding the bank and IL
iDnpaen, of any crime charged against
bin.
"Sow take William \. B9ggs tesil-
aDoHy. Did fle return from exile because
oi the overwhelming rep0rse d hls con
science2 NJ, il Iooks " ne ar i f.e fs-
t1reed 10 order ~ df4g all ti,e1e nSfil m
d!cted into the EIire wih him purely pgt
II repenge. and 10 eudeaTw - carry all
tise1e usen fehlnG the prison barr with
him. ~ yf,a belseYe il sas true tiIai No.
William y. BDggs, iad systematically
fgbfed this bank !or YEAR tgr the h@he-
Z fi g} tlpee sDen AID 10 ohe eFer knew
aattfing abygt Tbs drlaicatIDn%'
"Ngw taae tBe v ,tHess@s III the de-
ince. Richard K. kehnsy, William J..
/ CCfDr, Harry Ford John K. Mcfjoni2a.,
ANN Cgse and CAar.es H. bGtief DD
you GejieYe that tige-e Ben would q on
tie H.tHess stand amd iJcz No, i - lnpys-
s.b.e. AID Sc, tue dj.trleE attorney bas
made the tyyJd assertion that every time
gne ofth indicted men eDAHes here thrre
viii he ore 3ess,
And nos. IN rDgcl8,jOn, gentlemen,
allow ne u szy: 10 unto Glyeyr a. you
WDuld bD done BY and then consider
i)y yga think that tbe.s men snDEid ~
sent " the peniteAtiaty ier Fears and
there miDgIc with DGrdercrr and tbleye4
10, gentlemen u the jury, J say YOU
cann0t conqjct tbig man on the uncGr.
rg,lgratcd testimony u William y D|y22E.
"Y0u nGst remember, gentlemen u
the Jury, thai the sinh u ti,e iather shall
b. listed upon the Children onto the
third ard fourth generation anc, there
fare. gentlemen Of the jury, in cGaciu-
SION, allow me ~ -aY that ark at Jour
hands d verdict Of Bd guilty"
During his remarks. Nr Elg2t a.sO
ep1ke u the light in which the family pi
defendant ~yud be piacrd j be we're
cyHyirtrd and, during ti. Tlyid word
picture Di tEcir dc-1latIOA Al tie i9s: II
q hg.Gand snd f&tAer'e protectIDD and
tie eaiu that wgu'd i,e p!aced On their
names, two laajc. s.alcd rear NJ Clafk
"cd
w. yAsVH,EiPy' r ErnLIAaT sPEECIL
D.uict Attunry IeEis &. Nande2r.;t
then cIps,.I the ear. for the gnTcnmrn,
and raid:
"With tie pam.-.lyH 0i the cprtt aud
gent le,acH VI the Jury, "Hen ! H.aGe MY
opening ~idfce. .aId il goD have any
reasonable dDUN that III: defendant.
Thomas =. Clark, tWl no Intention u
dcira1diHy tri. bank 10 render verdict
ii not guilty.
. u ai7y tOld ypu thai the learned cVua.
ScI oD the Dthrr ridc wc1d take iJr hjs
drjen-c one thing and ihat was that
William \. KDgg. had lied On tic Wit
Dess stand. saS ~ yDG that William
y, Eo2gr has not lied and that he IL a
Young man, not quite ~ ycars Oi a2e,1nd
va. IN the clutches pi a man much Older
than himself, whp Ied him on in hl.
path oi rain until he eventually was
compelled to flee.
"You Layc Eat here patiently for more
than "A Wc"k listening ~ th" testimony
u tijr Casc and for thn ira-Du, gentlemen
ui the jnry,l ~Ill fay that AZ long ar am
district attorney for this pOHcutu"nt !
viii not ask for the conviction II any
man uuIoE4 have forged the chain Dl
guilt link by IIrk against hIln,
WY learned trl"nd in hIs address
to You raiI that haze made the state.
lncnt that every time one Of the men N.
dIctcd for the lD"lin2 81 this bank cone
icTr there will be one less ! did make
that statement, gentlemen oi the jury,
yesterday and repeat it, that every time
one III these men comes here there VIII bf
one lc-r. do not gay this IN Il spirit o
aninp.ity or uniflrndllncrs but do saS
that viii DO all in my power TO convict
these men, for believe them guilty
A wrong has been done the citizens d
thir state and II II now about to bt
rghtcd.
MY learned friend on the other side
has aiEO made the statement that vii
liam NBuggs returned from hI. enforced
exile purely oui Of the spirit Of revenge
but say t. yUu gentlemen OF the jury
that he tod the truth on tie witness
stand when he said tIlai hc had rellIIncc
merely To- right til" wrong done the bans
~ far ~ lay III his power ana 10 end tII'
period pi LiA ,crrIhi" exile.
"Npw have only one thing TO snv in
reference to thc $3.50 check ui May IT.
1896 and that is that Clark got this
money and then paid it On May II, lSN
witI woflhcrs draft II Thomas :
Clark was an honest man. Why didn't ln'
take these two $3.50 checks to the First
National Bank and say TO John u. Bate
an, Mr.. lal"lnan have here two $2G
checks. have nothing to pay them witt
blt her" If some Bay State Gag stock tc
pay = potion ol II. suppose hc had
done this? Why my friend lialcmal
wonld hav" had Il Iil, And why? Fol
the reason that they would have know
that here was n man whom they wOnld
nal have trusted to , cents, with $500 o
VII" bank + money in lis possession.
''Ihc defense also claims that after the
transfer Of tin" Bay State tias stock BY
Clark TO William n. Eoggs, that Isogg'
could hav" sold the stock and paid the
checks, why gentlemen of the jury, d,
YOU suppose that T., H. Cuthbcrt x Co
would have returned 500 10 William n
Boggs on "A declining Nock2 The asscr
ton iH prcpos'crOnH and they wonIo
never have returned the money,
"lnkr now the $j2 check given b,
Clark 10 william n. EoggA for gnmb
, ling debt prior to l,oggS departure, d.