The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1898-10-07

Section 100 (Burns's r. S.. 1924 in no wise
deprives said court of such jurisdiction.
either In respect 10 the person of the de-
PENDANT the subject matter of the ac-
ton, will only lie where the defect appears
upon the face of the complaint.
1868 Baldwin VS.. Boyce. Delaware c.
G. Reversed. Jordan, il The description
certain and one which will enable third
persons, aided by the inquiries which the
instrument itself indicates or suggests. 10
identify the mortgaged property. Parol
evidence may be employed to aid in the
identification OF property described in the
mortgage. 2. Omitting to give the location
of goods described in a chattel mortgage is
not an omission fatal to the instrument if
the property is otherwise sufficiently de-
scribed. 8. In an action to forecose a chat
was recorded in a certain county, the mort
gage exhibit may suffice to show that the
mortgageor resided in the county where 1t
was recorded at the time of its execution.
4 An allegation that the plaintiff holds a
Lien upon property by virtue Of the mort
debt secured by. the mortgage is unpaid.
1852 Goodrich VS.. Strangland. Noble c.
c.. Supersedeas ordered only for stay of
lants who join in the appeal and as TO the
enforcement of benefits assessed against
them.
Appellate Court.
25s6. Denman VS.. Warfield. Fountain C.
c. Affirmed. Henley. c. Ut must appear
by entry in the. record that the bill of ex-
for this court to determine questions de-
pending upon the evidence for their. solu-
ton; the mere recital Of the fling in the
2SO3 c. & E; Railroad Company VS..
Wiley, il. Where the rights of creditors
do not intervene, the general fund of an
estate may be resorted to in paying the cost
of an action at law where such costs are
adJudged against the estate. 2 A judg-
ment for costs is conclusive against a col
lateral sttack.
Transferred to Superior Court.
2624 City of Huntington VS.. Burke Wa
pasn Z. {. Certiorari granted.
Superior Court.
Room ii. L. McMaster, Judge
Lettie Martin. administrators, VS.. P, c..
g g, & St. L. r. r. Co.; damages. On trial
Francis G. Eggleston VS.. Johanna Stead
ing ct al; foreclosure. Finding for plaintiff
Room 2-Lawson NJ. Harvey, Judge.
:. Adrienne A Johnson VS.. Alonzo A. Nc
Cray; damages. Jury returned verdict for
plaintiff in the sum of $2S7.
Theodore r. Smither VS.. VIM " Rocker:
account. On trial by jury.
Room 3-Vinson Carter Judge.
State of Indiana ex rel. Mildred Mccoy
VS.. VIM. McCarty ct al; habeas corpus
Custody Of child given to its mother, Elva
Mccoy. Judgment against defendant for
costs.
John M. Jones VS. Frank r. Harding;
UIcdCl OI contract. jury returned a Vefuict
for plaintiff for $25
Edward d. Evans VS. Thomas H. Shearer
ct all foreclosure. Dismissed and costs
paid.
Orange L. Norman VS.. Joseph T. Gist
ct al; damages On trial by jury.
Circuit Court.
Henry Clay Allen, Judge.
Richard z. Hasbrouck VS.. the Eureka
Grocery Company; receivership. BY agree
ment of parties cause was dismissed at de-
PENDANTS costs. Judgment against defend
ant for costs.
New Suits Filed.
Samuel A. Harlan VS.. Mary A. Schooley
ct al; suit on notes. Superior Court
Room 3.
Samuel A. Harlan VS.. John w, Woods;
suit on notes. Superior Court, Room /.
Indiana Bond Company VS.. Martha E.
Landers; Improvement lien. Superior Court
Room !.
Indiana Manufacturing Company vs. In
diana. Decatur & Western Railway ct al.
damages. Circuit Court.
The Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance
Company VS.. Mary j. Gaylord ct al; mort
gage. Superior Court, Room l.
Edward Gainor VS. Claudius G. Jones ct
al; suit for damages. Superior Court
Room 3.
Amos j. Morris VS. Mary c. Morris; suit
for divorce. Superior Court, Room 2.