New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1898-08-17
NORE LIGHT on HOOLEYISN.
EARL DELAWARE ADMITS RECEIVING
GIFTS AND LOANS.

London. Aug l6-In the Queens Bench Division
OF IN, High Court OF Justice to-day Justice Wright
resumed the hearing OF the motion TO commit Earl
Delaware and Messrs Broadlcy Bradshaw and
Rucker FOR contempt OF court in attempting to In
duce Ernest Tcrah Hooley. the bankrupt company
promoter falsely his evidence In the Bankruptcy
Court Mr.. Iioolcy. who was sworn. explained the
discrepancy between his own statement that he
had PAID Earl Dclawarr $4,000 and the Earrs
statement that he had only received i2j 90 by say
ing tina; he paid the latter f25.oH directly and sub
scqucrtly paid him an equal amount through Mr..
Broadlcy NJ. Hooley's agent. FOR division between
Earl Delaware and Lord AlbemarIe Mr.. Hoolcy
said he had since discovered that Broadley kept
the f20c.
Regarding Earl Delawarrs alleged offer Of
n.Jo II he NIoolcy) would contradict his formc-
evidence. the bankrupt said that Mr Broadley At
tn. Brunswick Hotel offered him tho money In the
Eqrrs presence. and the change OF statement
which Earl pcawarr wished him to make was
written out there IN the presence Of the Earl
After severe c-oss-cxamina:lor. in which Mr..
Hooioy stuck to his guns. Justice Wrigh; dismissed
tho summons against Mr.. Bradshaw
The latter then went on the staua and ASSERTED
that Earl Delawarr In the course Of CONVEX
sation with Bradshaw AZ to Mr. Iiooloy. onerei TO
wa, prc.afcd also to holy Mrs. TIooey to the ex-
ten; Of 600. Earl Deawarr, Mr. BRADSHAW de,
the oher. ~ the matter might be construed as az
aemp, at bG NJ oo %as Would is be- Asked to e"
rect lis original evidence. While on the stand Mr.
Bradshaw tainted.
Earl Delrwarr was next sworn. and he repeat
ed In substance the testimony he had already given
before the Registrar I'm Bankruptcy TO the ene,t
that he received nothing for becoming director In
tho Dunlop company or 10. Introducing others 10
Mr. Hoclcy. lie admitted that he had suggested 10
Mr. bradshaw that me latter could perhaps induce
Mr. Hoolcy to correct certain Measurements Dur
ing cross examination with reference 10 his tel"-
gram 70 Mr. Hooley asking him TO make IL clear
that he (thc Enrl' did not have 5000 on account
Of the Rotation II the Dunlop COMPANY. the Earl
said his only objec, to get Mr. Hooley to cor
rect wrong statements. adding. Il never saw the
paper alleged 10 have been written at the Bruins
wick Hotel" 49,
The Earl Acknowledged receiving IS 90 az gist:
lie said that he subsequently received tl.3U ana
that at a later date he borrowed 10000 but this
money rot paid 20 him FOR Joining the dire
toratc. Later thu Earl said. he was released from
this debt by Mr.. iIooley. He admitted that no
knew Lord Albemarl. received 1900 and MI
Broad'cy tS0' .
when Ne questioned Hooley with relation 10 his
Measurements he cleared. liooey replied That
Il an right id NOS know what was saying. ana
shall take tn, first opportunity TO straighten nat
tiers out
Mr. Broadlcv testified thai there was not wort
Of truth IN the statement that he had intercepted
money He charac'erizcd Nj. iiooey's evidence rs
"a farragO OF faschoods.
Justice Wright will render his decision to-mor-