The San Francisco call., 1898-08-03
"MAMMY" ALLEGES
 A BIG CONSPIRACY
CLAIMS LUCIUS L. soLoMoNs
 HAS DEFRAUDED HER.
She Was Generous, She Says, and Then Her Confidence Was
 Ruthlessly Violated.

Nanny" Pleasant, the aged but stall wart negress who guards the portals of the House of Mystery" the home of the Bells, has more trouble which she has carried to the courts for settlement. This time she appears as plaintiff in an action against a multitude of defenuants, of which Lucius l.. Solomons is most prom inent, to set aside deeds to two pieces of real estate in this city-one on Sutter street, near Jones, the other on Washing ton. near Stone.
 On February 4, 1897. alleges the aged Nanny while Solomons was acting as her counsel, she was actuated by desire to be generous, and without consideration executed a note for $30O0 winch she pre- sented to Solomons. She requested, how ever, that the note should not become payable until after her death, but not withstanding her request she ayers that Solomons placed the note in a commercial bank Of this city for collection. SubSe- quently she received word from the bank that certain interest was due on the note. She informed Solomons of the word she had received from the bank, and asked him how 1t occurred that he had violated the trust between them. He informed her that he had found himself in tinancial dis tress and had given the note as collateral to Julius Kahn as security for loan. He stated that he had hoped to reclaim the note prior to the fact that 1t had been ne- gotfated became known, but as -.ahn had deooSited 1t for collection his wishes had been defeated. Later Solomons called on Mrs. Pleasant and informed her that in some manner Kahn had aseertained the been made and had threatened to have AIm (Solomons) arrested and disbarred for having procured a loan on worthless note. By reason of these facts Solomons stated that he was in great need of money in order to redeem the note and save himself trouble, but that if he were to have vested in him immediately the apparent title to valuable real estate, which title he might show to his creditor, he would be enabled to placate nm and tide over his difficulties. SolomonS, she alleges, begged her to execute him con veyance of the real pronerties on Sutter and Washington streets, which, she says. he promised to reconvey to her when his clouds of trouble drifted away and she, "out of commiseration for said Solo mons trusting In his yeracity. conveyed
 All of Soomons' story was false, con- tinues Nanny in her complaint. Solo mons never borrowed sum of money payment himself. Instead of reconvey- ing the property he caused the deeds to be recorded in his own name, and then for the purpose of further injuring and defrauding her executed a deed of trust to Harry Block and Benjamin Harris, thereby securing the payment to Leo claiming that Solomons had made de- fault in the payment of. the s40o0 alleged to be due, Harry Block and benjamin Harris, in the manner provided in the deed of trust, sold and conveyed the prop erty to Leo Block A short time later Leo Block and his wife, Bertha w, Block, deeded the property to Thomas R. Hob son, and Hobson mortgaged the real es- tate to the Hibernia Savings and Loan Society Nanny alleges that the prop erty is valued at $40 .O00 and states that by reason of ''the conspiracy" she has been defrauded out of 1t. In consequence she prays that the court decide that her title to the property is wand. that a receiver be appointed during the litigation. and tbec the defendants be restrained from further proceeding in an endeavor to. establish their illegal claims"