Rock Island Argus., 1898-10-04
CIRCUIT COURT MATTERS.
Grist of Cases Disposed of Since the Com
venins< of tho September Term.

among the cases dlspoSed OF by
Judge Gest since she beginning of the
September term are the following:
! Law-City of Moline VS.. E. j. East
man, appeal, dismissed by agreement
at defendants cost; Bert Dilly VS.. Rob-
ert Wagner, appeal dismissed by
plaintiff; Lizzie McGraw VS.. Harper
House company, appeal, dismissed for
want of prosecution; Wallace Burton
vs.. j. A. Pettifer, appeal. dismissed
for want of prosecution; NJ. T.John-
son vs. w. Y. Milstead, assumpsit,
dismissed; Anne Zeutgraf VS.. Nels
Pierce, Henry Huberty, A. II. Arp
and Chris Peterson, appeal, Judgment
for S26.s7; Fred Young VS.. Theodore
and August Wiegandt, appeal, strick-
en-; William Peters VS.. Twin-City Ice
company, APPEAL, dismissed; Elvira
Moore VS.. Robert Blackwell, case, dis
missed; Blake & Murphy, vs..
Michael Murphy, assumpsit, con-
tinueR to next term; John Z. Down
ing VS.. David Cramer, dismissed
for want of prosecution; NJ. A. Gould
VS.. j. w. Morgan and Charles
S. Altz, appeal, dismissed; Elmer Ag-
new ct al, for ise,of A. H. Arp, VS..
f. c. Hemenway and j. b. Oakleaf as
garnishees, appeal, Judgment by agree
ment; Chesire Provident Institute VS..
Howard III. Grover, debt, dismissed; /;
Olof Olson vs. Olfred j. Lindsborg,
finding for plaintiff, motion for new
trial; Alice c.. Walker VS.. Richard L.
Leonard ct al, dismissed; Andrew An
derson, administrator, VS.. Jacob
Weaver. assumpsit, dismissed by
plaintiff; Samuel Kennedy VS.. Carl A.
G. Dahn and Frederick Dahn, cove
nant, dismissed; North Dakota Mill
ing association VS.. Tri-City Milling
company, default. and Judgment of
$446 for plaintiff; Patrick L. McKinnie
vs.. Holt q Savage, judgment by agree
ment; John Looney VS.. Susan B. Caw-
er, appeal, stricken from docket; n.
p. Carlson, for use of Jack Bur-
CESS, VS.. r. Dorbeck, appeal, dis
missed at defendants cost; Jeanette
ID. Chapman ct al. VS.. w. A. Dierolf,
distress for rent, dismissed; David
Cramer VS.. John Channon and Will
liam Passmore, assumpsit, dismissed;
Charles l.. Walker VS.. Alden II. Foster,
assumpsit, dismissed; Henry Darts
Sons VS.. John NJ. Holt and Charles II.
Savage, assumpsit, default, judgment
of $9SS.1S for plaintiffs; Albert H.
Thompson VS.. John Evans, sci ia to
revive, default, and judgment for
plaintiff of $500 Sc.
Chancery-Minnie Ploog, guardian,
VS.. Owen German. eft al, foreclosure,
report of sale approved and cause
stricken; Arthur Burial VS.. John
Looney, ct al, mechanics lien, default
of last term set aside by consent; La
hiff IL Cox VS.. John Looney, nechan-
les lien, default of last term set aside
by consent; Augusta G. Anderson VS..
ct al. vs.. James w. Murray, Jr., ct al,
foreclosure, report of sale approved;
Alfred Williams VS.. John 5. Olson, ct
al, foreclosure, report of sale approx
sd; Barbara Stevens Us. Rose Helm and
Modern Woodmen of America, bill,
masters report approved; Moline
State Savings Bank VS.. Matt ID. Fau-
berg. ct al, foreclosure, report of sale
Moline State Savings bank
vs.. r. a. Smith, foreclosure, sale ap-
proved, cause stricken; Black Hawk
Ella b. Daxon, ct al, foreclosure, sale
Virginia Cowden VS..
Thomas j. Rodman, foreclosure, sale
dDDTONeu, Cdusc sJTlChcn- a. r. w.
Shultz and Anna Shultz VS.. Matte III.
and A. II. Arp, bill to set aside deed,
dismissed; l.. S. McCabe VS.. Samuel
Peterson, ct al, foreclosure, sale APP
proved; Minnie Clark VS.. S. X. Hat
field, foreclosure, sale approved;
w. w. Warner VS.. Lille Drury,
sale approved; Rhoda Cowden VS.. j.
julius StrOehle, foreclosure, sale APP
proved; Rock Island Savings bank VS..
Carrie ii. Meese, foreclosure, sale APP
proved; Rock Island Savings bank rs.
Levi F. Cralle, foreclosure, sale APP
proved; Stephen L. Goodlow VS.. c. A.
York, foreclosure, dismissed; Francis
Ficken VS.. Emma Todd, foreclosure.
j. +. Robinson, trustee for
j. l.. O'Connor, vs.. X. j. Hutchinson
and Matilda Hutchinson, dismissed;
Griffin Clay Manufacturing company
VS.. William T. Vehamin, mechanics
lien, dismissed.
In the suit for separate maintenance
of Minnie SCHNEIDER VS.. Remig Schind- |
Ter, the complainant was allowed $15 |
per month alimony.
All is evidently serene once more in !
the household of Mr.. and Mrs. John |
Welch. Entry on the docket shows |
the dismissal of Mrs. Welch's bill for
divorce at her cost.