The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1898-12-10
he IS A PHYSICAL WRECK
Dickinson. Alias Veno, Will Not
Be Tried Again.
HE IS PUNISHED 0
Philip B. c. Goodwin Alleges Tha Quinn
Is Neither Competent Nor Legally
Qualified to Manage h Estate.
Antagonistic interests.

The opinion of the supreme court In
the case of Dudley N. Dickinson. alias
Veno, reversing the case and granting
the defendant a new trial.. was received
by the clerk of the district court yes
terday. The opinion, the substance OF
which was published in the Standard
last Tuesday. covers IL typewriter
pages and goes very thoroughly into
the case. 1t is not yet known when
veno will be brought up from the peni-
Tertiary, but probably very soon. 1t
Is not likely that he will ever be put
on trial again. for. even IL a legal case
could be made against him, ii is con-
eidered that the man has been amply
punished for what he has done. 1t is
said that the medical fakir's health is
shattered n tina he looks a physical
wreck.
Philip b. c. Goodwin, the special
administrator of the estate Of Charles
Quinn. deceased, yesterday filed in
court an answer to the objections made
TO his appointment by Bernard Quinn.
He denies that he is not qualified or
competent to manage the estate. on
the other hand. he alleges that the OBJ
1ector, Bernard Quinn, is neither COM
petent nor legally qualified to be ad-
ministrator Of the estate, as there Is
now pending in the supreme court a
case in which the late Charles Quinn
IS plaintiff and Bernard Quinn defend
ant, and the ~latter's interests are an
~tagonistic TO the estate of Charles
Quinn. The case will be soon set for
argument, and it will be necessary to
have the special administrator put in
as plaintiff in place of the deceased.
Goodwin made an afHdavit that Charles
Quinn, in 1884, made a will leaving his
estate to his brother, Bernard Quinn.
The latter also made a will n the
conditions of both Wills were that the
surviving brother should inherit the
property of the deceased. During the
lifetime of Charles Quinn, Bernard
Quinn transferred all his property to
A Patrick O'Donnell, thereby depriving
h his brother, in case he had survived,
of the possibility of inheriting under
the conditions of the Wills. Goodwin
says that III the supreme court de-
cides the case in favor of the estate
the will under which Bernard Quinn
holds will be a nullity.
p. S. Harrington, l.. p. Bowman and
w. j. N%aughten made affidavits that
Goodwin is able and competent to man.
age the estate.
Judge Lindsay will continue the trial
of cases to-day and all matters upon
the probate and motion calendar for
hearing are continued until next Sat
urday. The following matters are on
Judge Clancy's calendar for this morn
ing:
State of Montana VS.. G. r. Shadwell,
sentence; Daniel Harrington VS.. Phi
j. Harrington, demurrer; Montana
Lumber and Manufacturing company
VS.. Charlotte Cassidy ct al, demurrer;
estate of Charles Quinn, objections 70
appointment of special administrator
Eclipse Stove company VS.. p. II. Re-
gan, motion for commission to issue Ia
take testimony; r. NJ. Boyer VS.. Char
lotte Cassidy ct al, order to show
cause; Miles Finlen VS.. Boston & Mon
tana Con. Nj. Co. and 5. Corder. to
show cause why order of survey should
not be granted.
In the case OF p. F. Doyle against
T.. l.. Mahoney. the jury yesterday re-
turned a verdict for the defendant and
decided that he was the owner of tbs
furniture of the Great Northern hote
at the time p. II. Toole sold IL e
Doyle.
The $500 damage suit of John Nc.
Cormick against the city of Butte was
tried before a jury in Judge Lindsay's
court yesterday and will be submitted
this morning. Mccormick claims hi
residence was damaged by a sewer
overflow.
Thomas II. Lynch yesterday brough.
suit against II. II. Walker for $65 and
SIS attorney fee and to foreclose a lier
on lot 1, block Is, of the Noyes & Up.
ton addition.
The motion to quash the information
against George w. Nicholson was Sc
for hearing Dec. IL.