Perrysburg journal. (Perrysburg, Wood Co., O. [Ohio]) 186?-1965, 1898-04-23

NSAS ACSpGCllully,
(Slgned ]. L. DENTON.
Prof. Mechanical Engineering.
letter from Prof. II. c. Carpenter, of
the Department. of Experimental
Engineering, Cornell University, to
l.. A. w. Dulletini
Ithaca, N Y, March IA. 1898.
Dear Sir: My attention has been recently
sailed to an extract from a report of mine
IN relation to the efficiency of bicycles,
which. from the heading of or from accom-
panying references is calculated to convey
the impression that the chain-drven bicy-
Gle is much more efficient than the chain
less. The report in question, taken as a
whole will not, believe. give the impress
sion that there is any material or sensible
difference. The report does show that the
chain-driven bicycle was on the whole
slightly more efficient than the bevel-gear
driven machine, but this difference was
many times less than that due to tires of
Inherent construction and in many cases
less than that due to individual tires of
the same kind and make. II follows from
the fact that riders have been unable to
1etect the great difference which existed
In the friction caused by different tires that
they will be entirely insensibie of the small
amount of difference which NAV be due to
the substitution OF the bevel-gear as a
driving mechanism for the chain. am,
Very Respectfully yours,
(signed) r. c, CARPENTER
The letters presented herewith from
two such eminent authorities as Prof.
James f. Denton and Prof. r. C. Car
penter, stamp as unfair and unwarrant-
ed the recent attacks upon the bevel-
gear chainless construction, made by
a manufacturer of chain-driven BIZ
cycles, through advertisements and dis
tribution of other literature.
The bit of inside history conveyed by
these two letters show how easily an
expert report if not given in full, may
be twisted to favor either side of sub
ject. AS soon as these unwarranted
deductions appeared in print, Prof. Car
penter publicly pronounced them un-
fair to him and to the bevel-gear chain
less construction. Prof. Carpenter
claims to find by dynamometer tests a
slight but insensible mechanical su
periority for the chain. Prof. Denton,
in his article in the Iron Age" shows
that no superiority can be demonstrated
by dynamometer tests for either chain
or bevel-gears. Both agree that under
ideal conditions, by the dynamometer
the two mechanisms are practically
equivalent. Our experience, however,
demonstrates that this equality ceases
the moment the bicycles are put in ac-
tual service on the road. In a dyna-
mometer test the chain-driven bicycle
meets the most favorable conditions,
which do not exist for it on the
road. No bicycle rider need be told
that the moment a chain and sprocket
is exposed to the weather the lubricant
begins to dry, the blocks and teeth to
clog with the dust and mud of the
road and deterioration commences.
Even if protected from the foregoing
influences, stretching will occur with
the best chains and sprockets, causing
back-lash and consequent inability of
the rider to maintain a straight track
in hill climbing, thus neccsstating
chainless wheel, the high efficiency
shown by the dynamometer continues
indefinitely under actual service. Ow-
ing to the fact that its driving mechan-
ism is not affected by the weather or
road conditions, and the further fact
that there is no back-lash, and conse-
quently uniform pressure can be
maintained upon the pedals, this uni
formity of pressure giving the rider
perfect control of the wheel and en-
abling him to maintain straight track,
thus obtaining the benefit of every
ounce of applied power, the Columbia
bevel-gear chainless, by this great saw
ing of muscular energy, enables the
rider to ride at least ten per cent. far
ther with the same effort than he could
on the chain-driven bicycle. Expert
cycle engineers state positively that the
best bicycle chain and sprocket ever
made cannot retain their highest eff
cheney after 700 miles of riding, and
hnk Il