The Scranton tribune. [volume] (Scranton, Pa.) 1891-1910, 1898-10-25

Albright, in which the libellant makes
the remarkable allegation that she was
made a grass widow eleven days after
marriage.
Both she and her husband were resi-
dents OF this city, but for four years
previous to the wedding he made his
residence in Boston, being engaged In
business there. They were married in
ST. Luke's church, June Is. 1885, and on
the same dav went to Boston to live.
On June &c, she says, her husband left
her without any cause or provocation
as far as she knows, and, although she
wrote to him repeatedly in Baltimore
and Philadelphia, he never answered
her letters. The only communication
she ever received from him was an In
direct one, notifying a physician who
attended her that he would not be held
responsible for any bills contracted by
his wife.
There was no appearance for the re-
spondent and Judge Archibald, being
familiar with the case from having
himself conducted the hearing, granted
a decree forthwith on motion of Mrs.
Albright's attorney, Hon. M. +. Sando.
In the two new cases of NJ. A. Nc
Carthy against Margaret Scanlon, ad-
mnistratrix of the estate of Martin
Scanlon, deceased, Judge Archibald
handed down the following order:
THE ORDER MADE.
The case presents very much the same
features as are found in the case between
the same parties tried in this court some
two years ago and taken by appeal of
the plaintiff to the Supreme court. Pend
ing the disposition of that case, by con-
sent of the parties to this one, we have
held it until that was heard from. 1t
has just been affirmed and the sufticiency
OF the defense interposed to the enforce
mcnt of the judgment is thereby estab-
lished. The same must be regarded as
also true here and the judgment must be
opened in consequence. The rule Is made
absolute and an issue awarded to be
made up by the note standing as a de-
clarution and the defendant plea ding pay
ment and payment with leave thereto.
The order was made to apply to both
cases. These cases are based on two
notes given by Scanlon to Mccarthy,
one February 4, 1887, and the other Feb
ruary Z, 1883. The first was for $3.50 and
the second for $500. AS in the case
which went to the Supreme court, the
defendant AYERS that Mccarthy ad-
mitted to her in the presence of wit
nesses that the notes were paid.
In the case of DR.. William Hacgerty
against the city Of Scranton the ex-
ceptions to the report of the referee
were dismissed and the report con-
frmed. DR.. Haggerty was awarded
$1,000 damages for injuries received by
being thrown from his carriage by
reason of an obstruction OF Pittston
avenue.
Through neglect or design on the part
of the lbellant's attorney the divorce
case of francesca Monello against An
tonic Marie Carlo Monello was
quashed. The case was marked for
argument, but when it was called
neither the attorney nor the files could
be found and Judge Archibald there
| upon wrote after the case mo files, no
attorney, no argument, rule for divorce
discharged"
DAVIS DIVORCE CASE.
Another divorce case, that of William
Davis against Grace Davis, was
quashed because of the unwillingness
or the libellant's attorney to proceed
any further in 1t. The lihellant was
recently convicted of bigamy in Wyom-
ing county and is serving a two years
sentence In the penitentiary. The di-
Vorce case of Willis A. Clark against
Minnie {. Clark was also quashed, the
proceedings being withdrawn.
The divorce cases of Mary Worth
against William Worth; Sarah Kesten
against William Kesten, Albert l.. Wal
lace against Jennie Wallace, were sub
mitted without argument.
In the following cases the rules were
made absolute: William Lord & Co.
against Il. II. Gibbons, rule for judg-
| ment; ID. B. Replogle against NJ. j.
| Norton, rule to open judgment; Will
| lam VI. Clark against Edwin Northup
| and Eugene Reed, rule to open judg-
ment; Ferber Bros. against Joseph H
| DaVitt, exceptions to affidavit Of de-
! fense and rule for judgment; Annie
| Chatanausk against Louis Nermesla,
| admins traitor, rule to intervene.
Rules We're discharged as follows.
! Peter Weiss against Annie Mahon, rule
| TO strike off lien; John Geary against t
| ID. r. Thomas, rule TO strike off appeal.
In the case Of Edward Griffin against
| Bernard Davis the exceptions We're Or
! dered stricken off.
| The cases of the commonwealth
against c. DUPONT Swift, certiorari: the
| Union Transfer company against w.
! II. Montgomery and others: William
! Neeley and c. NJ. HapgOod Shoe com
! pany, rule to dissolve attachment were
marked off the list.
In the following cases arguments
We're heard hut no decision rendered:
| Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to the
use of LackaWanna county against
| William j. Mccarthy; f. F.. Nettleton
against Josiah d. Caryl, rule to open
| judgment
POOR BOARD CASE.
Friday was fixed as the day for hear
| ing the arguments in the poor board
quo warranto case IN which John ].
Murphy is relator and f. L. Terppe
| respondent
Cases continued We're: New York and
Ontario Land company against An
thony Gilausky, rule to open judgment
Frank Wells against the city of Car
bondale, rule TO amend declaration;
! Allen Price against T.. G. Worden, rule
| to open judgment; Thomas Mason
against Michael Flynn, rule for new
trial; Mccoy & Co. against Joseph
Levy, rule to take off non suit: bor-
ough of Winton against Thomas j
Mack and others, rule 10 open judg-
ment; Bridget Brennan against the
Life Insurance Clearing company, de-
murrer; John $. Miller vs.. Interstate
Casualty company, of New York, de-
murrer; Lackawanna county against
John Yonalonis and others, rule to open
judgment; Clementine Renwick against
Robert Renwick. rule for decree in dl-
vorce; John Mcguire against r. F.
Oswell, certiorari; Florence Il. Fish