Eagle River review. [volume] (Eagle River, Wis.) 1890-1927, 1898-08-18

Genus, NO ffOI ~
ffty-six dollars and fifty cents
and No. 1915 for envelops thirty
EIGHT dollars and forty cents all
ten hundred and forty-four dollars
and fifteen cents being sum IN
excess of his salary and legal ex-
penses allowed and paid OF one
hundred and seventy-nine dollars
and sixty-fve cents.
That the aforesaid orders, TO-
wit: Numbers, 4o76 for one-hun-
dred dollars, 1885 for four-hun-
dred dollars, 1915 for one-hun-
dred and eight dollars and 1881
for two hundred dollars, in the
aggregate eight hundred and elgh-
dollars, and all Of which were Is
sued to said defendant Sanborn as
nayee and were all delivered to
him by the county clerk Of said
county, are now held, owned or
controlled by said defendant San
born, as plaintiffs are informed
and believe, as there is nothing
either of record or an assignment
of the same appearing in the office
of the county treasurer, county
clerk or clerk Of court OF SAID
county to show that there has ever r
been any assignment or transfer OF
the same by the said payee or that
he has in any manner parted with
his possession or right to the same.
XII. That the aforesaid order
No. 4425 for one hundred dollars
in which said G. F. Sanborn, is
payee was passed by a pretended
assignment from said payee to one,
T. H. Hams. upon which, with
another order Of like amount, an
action was brought against said
Villas county by said Hanna as
nominal Plaintiff, Jan. 26, 1898.
That said defendant G. f. San
born had due notice of said action
as district attorney of said county
and we'll knew of the fraudulent
issuing of said order, but disre-
garding his duty as said attorney
of said county, and being in CO..
fusion with the said Hanna to |,
fraud said county, wholly nagg-
lected to defend said action and
fraudulently permitted judgment
to be entered by default against
said county, February Is. 1898,
for the full sum of 200 dollars
damages and fifty three dollars
and fifteen cents cost, and on the
18th day of said February, at the
instance of said defendant, 6. +.
Sanborn and in his behalf and in
terest, assigned the said Judgment
to the defendant, The OId National
Bank of Cambridge, Guernsey Co.,
Ohio, which now claims al interest
10 said Judgment and said order No.
1925, but which interest, it any it
has, is subject to all the equities
and rights existing between said
G.. T. Sanborn, the payee therein,
and said county, and which the
people and taxpayers thereof have
against said fraudulent order No.
1925.
That the aforesaid order No.
1880 for one hundred dollars, In
which sadie. +. Sanborn is payee,
was passed by pretended assign
ment, by said payee, to one May
P. TrimbIe upon which with an
other order for one hundred and
four dollars and eighty-seven cents
an action was brought against said
Villas county by said May P.
Trimble as nominal plaintiff, Feb.
9Th 1898. That said G. F. San
born had due notica Of said action
IS district attorney Of said county
and we'll knew OF the fraudulent
issuing Of said order, but disre-
garding his duty as said attorney
Of said county and being in col
fusion with said May ?. Trimble
to defraud said county, wholly
neglected to defend said action and
fraudulently permitted judgment
to be entered by default against
said county, February 26, 1898,
for two hundred and four
dollars and eighty-seyen cents
damages and ffty-three dollars and
thirty-five cents costs and on the