Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1898-09-09

.
He told % how his wife would come
into his barber shop and abuse him be-
fore the customers. making hls life a
! burden TO him. Al noon court took
rUcnHH.
on the RECOMMENDING m court this AZ
/ ternoon Hewlett was further examined
| by Mr. Hamilton and said he only
earned from 50 o. s. O. week In his bar
her shop OF Sandy. Admitted owning
four lots down there. The only adj
dltlonai information hrought.out under
| cross.oNnmlnntion was that his wife
/ was accustomed e. slap him around
and once hit him with n broom.
Gus Lundgrcn grocer ut Sandy,
| testified that Hewlett bought his
groceries with him and usually ordered
sufficient goods for the support u u
small family.
Edgar a. Davis and hs wife. Mrs
! Mary Davis both testified that they
I had taken meals with Hewlett. and he
also vet % good table.
David Hewlett. son " the defendant.
testified that he worked fur his father
In the barber shop and related the stor
over his fnthpr HIS father didn't
/ strike her. hut walked away.
william Bariey, butcher. said he
| had supplied Hewlett with fresh meats
/ two and three times "a week
Wells clark. mayor ~ Sandy. tcHti-
/ ncd that Hewlett bought groceries
and provisions u him, usually In small
/ quantities. however.
walter J. Hewlett. brother 81 de-
/ frndants testified that he ana his wife
| had taken meals at his brothers house
/ and always found them 90 be- good.
This concluded tho testimony and
Judge Hllcs held that plaintiff had not
/ made out case and hence dlHml Used
| The suit.
MARRIED \ BLIND MAN.
other case were disposed Of today
| aa follUwai Pauline Larsen was granted
| a divorce from Nclls y. Larsen on the
/ ground u failure TO provide. Plaintiff
! was also awarded 500 permanent ALL
/ m0ny and costs Of suit. The defendant
viii be remembered as the blind man
/ who used 10 play ON the streets of this
| city. ~ was stated that when grinding
his organ he earned from so % $40 a
/ month. Judge illles Inquired N the Dc.
/ frndant was blind when plaintiff
married him and recciylng an aiiirma-
| live reply said he didn't think under
| tho circumstances plaluiiu was en-
/ titled 10 any allmony II having been
shown that defendant was possessed OF
q home In Mantl M well as money In
/ the bank. his honor made the order
awarding Mrs. Larsen tco.
Kate T.. Wilson was granted a decree
q divorce from W Il. Wilson. on the
| ground ~ failure a. support. The par
tlrs were married on ihe 21ri of Febru-
iry, 1887. No nllmony asked for.
Mary c1e some slime ago brought
suit against Trunk q. C7c FOR separate
maintenance. A. the hearing today II
was brought out that The parties were
I married 40 kflWa Colo. AuRur, H..
/ 1891, Mrs. C0o was awarded $50 per
| month permanent alimony and tab at
torncy's fees
Hannah ". Young next obtained a
decree Of divorce from James l..
| Young. as well az The custody % tWl
minor children and costs OF suit. on
the grounds ~ dgterii1n ana failure O.
/ support. Thu Testimony % the plain
| IN was 10 rho eject that she married
/ Young az MlsDul, Montana. Febru.
] ary iNl ana that couple Of years
ago Do sent her 20 hcr people at Pres
son. Idaho. The defendant u now be-
| llrVcd % be ln salmon City, Idaho.
/ Mrs, Young Thought her husbands eN-
| cuse for leaving her was because he
/ didn't Ike children. having often 90
| expressed himself 20 her.
| quito young appearing woman
named Rose 3 White was divorced
/ from william white Jr., failure - pros
vide being the ground. The young wife
testified that Hhg married the defend
ant on the i0.h " November, 1896. and
shortly afterwards be told her 10 10
ana get her own living, a. he was -.
| ms 10 ana she would have 10 DO tho
same. The plaintiff further ptatsd that
since White abandoned her ahe had
been earning u livelihood by working
out.
Liza c. Stuart obtained an ab.omie
decree " divorce from Charles a.
Stewart. Plaintiff filed her sult la-t
May, bus since then moved 10 Loaf
vile, Colorado. Her deposltlona wrr,
read IN court to-day by Attorney George
l.. Nye, Her testimony went 20 show
mat she md the defendant were mar.
iitl IN Denver september 30. 1850, and
that fhree years later defendant a.
serted her. stuart Is now supposed 10
be IN Pueblo carrying on the buslnets
% aal01n keeper.
James n. Noble, a barber eunie,,.a
at Fred schmirs. 10 west Third s5,,th
street, was given decree OF diyorx'
from Matte Noble, on the ground VI
uVHQIll9h, According 10 Mobiles testi.
mony he got married at 0lenwood
Springs In February. 1880 and In Univ
1895, his wife deserted him al Dsnver
Judge llllrs asked the plaintiff N ne
had any Idea as 10 the cause OF his
wife doserilng him. Only she sald shs
didn't like me-" was Mobiles reply.
The ease N Emma NJ. Whiting y.
Charles r. whiting was continued for
the term. So
Bower H. Novel W Jennel T.. NOVEL;.
passed 10 foot of calendar.
Emily Ford " ueorge Ford. Same
order.
cyrene Hansen vs. Stephen Hansen;
same order.
Nellie Gllberg W. Aryold NJ. ullberr,
same order.
There are four more case on the reru-
lar call, among which IA the dt,,l,.-.
suit OF Jennie Woodrow against Col
AnnArau. --''-. N.--