Delaware gazette and state journal. (Wilmington, Del.) 1883-1902, 1898-07-21

,g that application had been made to
Ipe loan, the object being to borrow
4 no money 10 the meantime from Boggs.
enator Kenney WAS counsel for the
Inn association. Witness hoped to
orrow $3.50 or $500 In this way. In re-
liz to Mr.. Bird, he said Samuel W.
HALL, president of tho association, had
|ot endorsed the application with ink,
hut had told him something. Before
g had an opportunity to say what Mr..
all told him, he was prevented from
nawering by Mr.. Vanderbilt, who in
krposed an objection, and he was pre.
buted from making this explanation.
| Witness was cross examined by Mr.
Iandegrift. aod in reply to Mr.. Vando
1T he stated that what money no OH
ned from Bogga be borrowed. Hu bad
bt given recsipt for 1t, but the entire
hn was included in q bond for $3.50,
hich Cole and his wife had given.
a"IIow did you SECURE the money
Bked Mr.. Vandegrift. ~
"Wnat do you mean By secure the
oneyf' asked the witness. "Do you
beam how did / get it or how did I
bcure it after got it?"
LATTER you got 1T. that's what secure
beams" Mr.. Vandegrift explained.
"By giving him the bond OF myself
nd wife," was the renly.
"When you gave the bond to W. N.
boggs," Mr.. Vandegrift asked, ibid
|pu got all the papers II represented"
81 don't remember receiving any
bing," witness replied.
"Isn't it likely. though, " asked Mr..
"tbat you'd get what the
pud represents when you gave the
bnd?v
FITS likely replied the witnsss,
but don't remember receiving any
ing"
FIFTY-sIx PHILADELPHIA HOUSES.
EWilliam Anderson OF Philadelphia,
MON being called by the defence. was
ked by Mr.. Bird to state the reason
b receiving the Kenney, checks.
Witness said he had objected to talk
Q the checks OF William j.. Ootter,
i the reason that they could not be
led till they were collected.
"Apd you could Use Kenney's 81"
ked Mr.. Bird.
didn't know anything about Ken
" at tbs time" was the reply.
Witness explained that there were So
uses in Philadelphia 10 connection
ltd the transactions; that they are
Nv 10 the name of the Second Phoenix
ailding and Loan Association Of Phil
alpha: that there was and i5 money
the transaction; all of tho houses
\ ng rented at S13 per month and the
iications are that they will continue
he rented.
WITNESS WAS ross-sxamined by Mr..
D ndegrift, v no asked II any of Cotter's
leoks had come back protested. Wit
I rs replied in the negative, but said
thought it was at hia instance that
Z received no more OF Cottsr's checks.
did not known he was going to get
nnsy's checks.
PENCE CLOSES, WITH THE EXCEPTION
OF cooPER's TESTIMONY.
h & this juncture Mr.. Bird announced
u the defence had closed, with the
kepton OF one point, upon which is
irable to haye the testimony Of e.
Cooper. 1t ia understood that
bper is to be asked to testify con.
bling conversation which is alleged
have taken place between himself
! w. N. Boogs in New Castle Jail
BIZ ,Cooper's { conviction, the idea
4 ,J{ng to make an effort to contradict
ell IA of Boggs' testimony.
'ioMk. Vandegrift saiu he understood
10 defsnce wanted Cooper put in at an
hiFsRnlar period in the evidence. bnt
ii Mad no objection and was willing to
iced. He was granted few min
10 Is in which to prepare his witnesses
u testimony IN iebuttal.
Il Judge Bradford remarked incident
that there might be some delay
h ween the time the evidence IL all IN
d Al the time for charging the jury, az
i Guild require some time for consid-
IN ion, his time having hsen we'll oc.
ed with matters which have re.
n red rulings during the progress oil
an4 trial.
d THE GOVERNMENT IN REBuTTAI..
"a Ut 1l.35 O'Clock the district attorney
4 led William N. BUggs to the stanc
rebuttal. fJe asked him to explain
d figures which Senator Kenney hat
/ so as being Boggs' capital in 1896
d ggs aRid that willis the etatemen
b fairly correct about the items b.
y received in that period, yet 1t wai
isleading, from the fact that theri
u 4ere disbursements in that period, o
'IEhich Mr.. Kenney knew, which wer'
tp<ester than the receipts. Mr.. Bird oh
rtad to this testimony, but Judgi
d hdford said it was proper to go in u
D Initial, and Mr. Bird acquissced il
decision. Witness then spolss o
items in detail, showing tina
Il ernl of them were correct as givei
Senator Kenney and explaining som,
d the transactions involved. Thus, h,
d d that the iva noteH from which
but 5000 Was realized represented
i'd ns which had been made by him
ID their payment was simply his get
ID k back the cash ne had paid out
"a hgment of S9l.02 had nat been pHii
II him, but had been credited to hi
b puunt in his settlement with Mr.
ii [nney for professional services. Tn
Z 4mized account between Senator Ken
/ Sat and the witness was placed in eyi
% i0ce without objection.
i'd urther explaining the list of hi
III ital, Boggs said tho proceeds of th
II hart note of Sl04 vera placed to til
i Bit of Thomas S. Clark. In the Firs
fional Bank. In transaction In
Id wing a farm Boges said hs sustaine
oss. As to an item of 81, 200. th
% Deeds of loan, witness said he ha
vi bivej ths money, but that he ba
yiously borrowed money from ". N
ID kson to meet checks of Cooper
pney and others; and had to pa
ID poo out OF the 81 200, hscause OF thai
he district attorney said: mi
I'D pney stated that the loss which 80
4, sined through Bay State Gas who
bought on your account. include
check of $1,000. which was dc
:, ted to his credit, in the Fir
y ional Bank, on which your initis
y e placed. about July eth; what has
y TO say about that?''
no0u- Thara ia -, ;sta katoo n, ~