The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1898-04-19

The first move was important, and
! the resolutions were read, and the de-
claration with regard to the recogni-
ton of the independence of Cuba was
vociferously cheered by the Demo
| Gratis. This demonstration was re-
peated when the reading was complet-
ed. Both Mr.. Dingley, the leader OF
the Republicans, and Mr. Bailey. the
Democratic leader, We're on their feet
! Mr.. Dingley was recognized and he i'm
mediately moved concurrence in the
senate amendment, with the amend
ment striking out the clause in the
! first resolution which recognized the
/ independence of the existing republic
The actual form of the motion, which
was reduced to writing, was as fol-
lows:
Il move to concur in the senate
| amendments to the house joint reSolu-
ton, with an amendment striking out
| in the first paragraph. they are and
also the words and that the govern
ment of the United States hereby re-
! cognizes the republic of Cuba as the
true and lawful government on that
! island so that the first paragraph OF
the senate amendment will read as fol-
lows:
'First-That the people of the ISL
and of Cuba of right ought to be free
| and independent "
/
manded the previous question, which
served to cut off amendment and de-
bate.
INTENSE EXCITEMENT.
MI Bailey who was Immediately on
! his feet, asked if the motion to concur
with an amendment precluded mo-
| ton to concur. and was informed by
the speaker that it would not if the
motion was voted down. 1t was mo-
ment of intense excitement.
MIR. Johnson (Rep., 1nd) and Mr..
! Cromwell (O.) were on their feet, both
! demanding recognition to state parlia-
4 mentary inquiries. The former wanted
to ask unanimous consent to address
the house in antagonism to the motion.
| but he was howIed down. But when
Mr. Bromwell a moment later, declar-
| ed that he wished TO offer an amend
| ment to concur, the Democratic side
sent up cheer upon cheer.
The Republican side was ominously
silent. The speaker sternly commanded
order. and then informed Mr.. Bromwell
that his motion could not be entertain
ed until that of Mr.. Dingley had been
disposed of.
Mr. Bailey. under cover of making
plain inquiry, brought out clearly the
fact, unless the motion of Mr.. Dingley
was voted down, the house could not
vote on the motion to concur, of which
| Mr.. Rromwell had given notice.
| Mr.. Sulzer Dem, n. W attempted
to interpose with the point Of order
that Mr.. Bromwelis motion took prece-
| dcnce over that of Mr.. Dingley. He had
a copy OF the rules in his hand, and
was prepared to argue the question,
| but the speaker unceremoniously de-
clined 20 hear him.
No division was asked on the motion
Er-r he
main question a. chorus of voices from
beth sides went up for the yeas and
nays The roll call was watched with
| intense interest.
DEMOCRATS DISAPPOINTED.
The Democrats started to applaud ev-
cry Republican who voted NO, but
| the promised detection of over % mem
hers on the Republican side did not ma
terialize. The Democrats only had ID
opportunities TO applaud. 1t was ap-
parent before the end of the first roll
call that they were defeated.
Their disappointment was manifest
on their faces. while the countenances
of the Republicans were corresponding
ly joyful over the victory.
When Mr.. Boutelle of Maine aScer
tanned that the motion had carried by
a majority, he withdrew his vote, and
recorded present
The announcement of the vote, 49,
1885, and the decisive victory, was loud
~ applauded.
THE VOTE.
The following is the vote in detail on
the Dingley notion:
Yeas-Acheson, Adams, Aldrich, AL
exander, Arnold, Babcock, Baker, Barn
ham, Barney, Barrett, Barrows, Bar
tholdt, Beach, Belden, Bedford, Belknap,
Bennett Bishop, Boose, Boutelle Olls),
Brewster Broderick. Brownlow,
Rrumm, Bull, Burleigh, Burton, Butler,
Cannon, Capron, Chickering, Clark
Qa.). Clarke On. H., Cochran On. V,
Codding, Connell, Connolly, Corliss,
Cousins, Crump, Crumpacker, Curtis
(Kan.), Dalzell, Danford. Davenport,
Davidson, Dawson, Dayton, Dingley,
Deliver Dovener, Eddy, Ellis. Evans,
Faris, Fischer, Fletcher. Foote, Foss,
Hager, Hamilton, Harmer, Hawley,
Fowler IN. j., Gardner, Gibson, Gill
lette IN. W, Gillette (Mass.), Graft,
Grosvenor, Grout, Grow, Hager, Ham
ilton, Harmer, Hawley, Heatewole,
Heminway, Henderson, Henry Comm,
Henry Qnd), Hepburn, Hicks, Hilborn,
Hill, Hooker, Hopkins. Howard (Ala.),
Howe, Howell. Hull, Hurley, jenkins,
JOY, Kerr, Ketcham, Kirkpatrick, Knox,
Kulp, Lacey, Lands, Lawrence, Lin
rey, Littauer, Loudenstager. Lowering,
Lew, Lybrand, Mccall, McCleary. Nc
Donald McEwan, Mcintyre, Mahon,
Marsh, Mercer, Mosick, Miller, Mills,
Miner. Mitchell, Moody, Morris. Mudd,
Northway, Odell, Olmstead, Often, Ov
erstreet, Packer, Parker, Payne, Pearce,
Pearson, Perkins, Pitney, Prince, Pugh,
Quigg. Ray, Reeves, Robbins, Royce,
Russell, Shannon, Shattuck, Sheldon,
Showalter, Smith Ill.), Smith Is. ID,
W. A. Smith, Shower Southland, South
wick, Spalding. Sperry, oprague. Steele,
Stevens, Stewart On. j., Stewart
CWis.), Stone, C. W., Stone, w. A,
STROBE. Sturtevant. Tawney, Taylor
{OD, Thorpe, Tongue, Updegraff, Van
voorhees,, Walker tMass.), Walker
Vt). Wanger Ward, Weaver, Wy
mouth, Williams -(Pa.). Vest, Young
Pa) Total-17S-caused by Represent
alive Boutelle of Maine. after the an
nouncement, changing his vote from
yes 70 present"
Nays - Adamson, Allen, Bailey,
Barnes, Baker Gid, Ball, Bankhead,
Barlow. Bartlett, Bell. Bonner, Benton,
Bland, Bodine, Botkin, Bradley, Bren-
ner. Bromwell. Broussa"d, Brown,
Brucker. Brundidge, Burke. Campbell,
Carmack Castle, Catchings. Clardy,
Clark (Mo), Clayton, Cochran (Mo),
Colson, Cooney, Cooper CTex), Cooper
CsVis.), Cowherd, Cox, Cummings, Da-
vey, Davis, DeArmond. DeGraffenried.
Devries, Dinsmore, Dockerw, Dorr.
briggs, Elliott. Ermentrout. Fitzgerald,
Fitzpatrick, Fleming, Fowler IN. c.,
Fox, Gains, Greene, Griffoth, Griggs,
Gum, Handy, Hartman, Hay Henry