The Wadsworth dispatch. [volume] (Wadsworth, Nev.) 1892-1899, 1898-07-09


anti -wrongP Indeed, before he eS-
presses himself as a candidate anti-eor-
poration in the endearor to catch votes,
he should study the higher law 'born
of conscience" We esteem Quelqueiois
as a friend and had no desire to drag his
personality into this argument. and now
have none, however as Judge Mack's
political promoter we believe Quelque-
fois has an ak to grind, his assertions to
the contrary Notwithstanding, and we
offer the reasons for that belief in all
fairness to him. We are reliably In
formed that Qnelquefols said, in sub
stance, to some OF his lawyer friends,
that it was necessary for them to keep
Mack on the bench, because off OF 1t
Mack would get more than his share oil
the practice in that section. The law
yers to whom he told the tale put it in
the slush bucket forthwith. but had
they been idiotic, they might have
turned the grindstone. Again, Quel-
quefois is attorney for the b. x
e. Bank and with Mack off the
the bench Quelquefois will lose his job.
Again, while we do not know it, we be-
lieve Quelqueiois got a job on the Kir-
man estate. Besides Mack put fees IN
the way of Quelquefois. Quelquefois
probably has reversed Judge Mack and
Quelquefois probably, to the injustice of
his client on the account OF the need to
appeal, has received a higher fee for do
ing it. When we wrote of "Judge Mack's
glaring incompetency, his lack OF ability
and a%ttainments and knowledge of the
law" and said, she has a record that
perchance, will never be equalled, much
less excelled-for reversals in the STU
preme Court" we believed it all to be
true and believe it yet. When We say
he has been reversed rs often as sus-
tanned we offer the record, which Quel-
q%uefois says SIS better than outside
talk"
MAcK's U-NExcELLEp RECORD FOR REvEa.
SAILS.
Exparte Gardner, Ormsby Co., 1895,
....... Reversed
Loben;tein VS.. Story Co., 1895 Reversed
Lynip VS.. Buckner, 1895 49,. Reversed
Livingston vs.. Wagner, 1895, Reversed
State vs.. Vaughn, 1895. 49,. Reversed
State VS.. O'keefe, 1896 ...,.. Affirmed
Sadler vs.. State, 1896. ........ Affirmed
Gardner VS.. Gardner, 1895 Affirmed
Mcnamara rs. Heating, 1896 Affirmed
Wilson vs.. Wilson, 1896 ...... Affirmed
State vs. Meyers, 1896. ...... Affirmed
Lutz VS.. Kinney, 1896. -. -. Reversed
Manning vs.. Gignoux. 1856. Affirmed
State w. Mack, 1886. ........ Reversed
state VS.. Murphy, 1897. $500. Reversed
State VS.. V x I r K Co, 1897 Reversed
Folsom VS.. Marlette, 1897 -. Modified
and Affirmed
Lutz VS.. Kinney, 1897. ........ Reversed
Mandlebanm VS.. Gregovich, 1897 Affirmed
Adams vs.. Baker, 1897 ...... Reversed
Casinelli w. Casinelli, 1897 Affirmed
Foley vs.. Foley, 1898. ....... Reversed
Kennedy VS.. Adams, 1898. Affirmed
State VS.. Alta Silver Mining
Co., 1898. $500. ....... Reversed
Burgess VS.. Helm, 1898. 49,. Affirmed.
Susan Bailey rs. Liltell. 1888. Affirmed
In 26 cases appealed to the Supreme
Court, this remarkably erudite minister
OF the law was reversed Ii times, and ii
the 300 cases it is asserted he has tried,
had been appealed, We may reasonably
conclude he would have been reversed
100 times, 100 being to 300 as Is is 10
rs. 1t is very plain how the poor are
imposed upon by having an incompe-
tent judge seated upon the bench, ami
how the rich are correspondingly
favored. The burdens do not lie with
that equal weight justice intends they
shall. and the judge through ignorance
OF the law puts the long end Of the lever
into the hands OF the wealthy, and be-
comes not ''an engine OF Justice" but
"a monster of wrong"
Reason Why (haTOeFlain'S Collie, Cholera
and nj9prhnpS Dpmpiy ip tha 9nrt