The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1898-11-12
Perron and Wife Make q Record
in Matrimony.
A THIRD 0 SUIT
Twice Married and Twice Divorced and
Now They Wish to Be Separated
Again-Case Continued to Ac-
commodate q Butcher.

IN twice divorced, n the tnlfd suit
for divorce was begun in the District
court yesterday by Mrs. Perron on the
grounds of cruelty and intemperancs.
Perron is well known In Butte. The
couple were married in Deer Lodge in
the first place on August %. 1856. and
in November, 1890. he commenced the
first suit for divorce on the ground of
desertion and a month later he got a
decree. subsequently. In January, 1892.
they were REMARKED In Helena and on
September 2. 1897, Mrs. Perron appeared
as plaintiff in a suit for divorce, alleg-
ing cruelty. The court records ID not
show that anything was ever dom in
the case, but IL is probable that the
parties effected a reconciliation again
and that the prosecution of the suit
was dropped. In the third suit filed
yesterday by Mrs. Perron. she recites
the fact hat they were married in
Deer Lodge in August. 1885, and that
they were divorced in 1890 and remar-
ried in 1892. The plaintiff relates that
they have two children. a boy. aged
nine years. and a girl of five. During
the past 10 months. II is alleged. the
defendant treated the plaintiff In a
cruel and inhuman manner and has en-
tirely' failed and neglected to provide
for the plaintiff and their children, but
has left them destitute and dependent
or the labor of plaintiff and or the
kindness OF friends for support. She
alleges that the defendant has been in
the habit of coming home i'm n state
OF in~toxication about daylight and
abusing her and using vulgar and in
decent language to her I'm the presence
of their children, and especially charg-
ing her with adultery. Mrs. Per-on
says she has always behaved herself
as a true and faithful wife and assist
ed in supporting the defendant as well
as the children by her labor as a teach
er of music, doing her own housework
and taking care OF the children. The
defendant is a bookkeeper and collector
of claims and can earn. IL he will work.
at least 800 a month. The plaintiff
say she is the owner of some property
on the Railroad lode on which she has
paid $500 and on which there is \ bal
ance due of 1926. She asks the court
TO decree her to be the absolute owner
of the property described. that she he
allowed temporary alimony for the
support OF the children and that she
be awarded the custody of the children
and be granted counsel fees. George
Haldorn Is Mrs. Perron's attorney.
A case of Robert n. Rand against
Louis kipp and Henry Kipp. doing
business under the firm name of Kipp
Brothers,. was on trial before a jury in
Judge Clancy's court yesterday. The
case had been set for 9 o'clock in the
morning. but when IL was called one of
the defendants sent in word hat he
had to drive a butchers wagon and
would not have time to attend court
until in the afternoon, and the court
very accommodatingly continued the
trial Of the case until 1 o'clock, al
though Mr.. Cotter. who represented the
other side. objected to the postpone
ment. After he had been informed that
the case would go over till I o'clock, he
observed. by that time the butchers
will be through and the court can be-
gin. ! suppose"
The butcher was on hand in the af-
ternoon and the trial of the case was
proceeded with. Rand sued for Sass,
which he claimed was due him for cat
tie sold the Kipp Brothers in June, 1898.
The defense was that the firm of Kipp
Brothers was dissolved i'm September.
1892, and that they did not owe Rand
anything.
A suit for divorce was Instituted
yesterday by Lizzie Northey against
John Northey or the ground of cruelty
and non-support. They were married
on u IL. 1897. in Butte. The defend
ant has repeatedly called the plaintiff
vile names and has inflicted bodily in
jury on her. On the 9Th of December,
1897. he struck her in the face with his
fists. ard for more h a year he has
contributed nothing to her support. She
asks for SIS a month alimony an $75
counse fees. ID. II. Kehoe is her attor-
ney.
In Judge Llndsay's court yesterday
the case OF John w. Gilligan against
James p. Smith and others was dismiss
ed at the cost OF appellant for want of
prosecution.
The forged warrant case OF the First
National bank against the city of Butte
was dismissed as settled.
A default vas entered in the divorce
Ease of Rosa Dickinson gainst Boyd
T. Dickinson Inc the plaintiffs proofs
were set for hearing this afternoon.
The following matters are on Judge
Lindsay's calendar for hearing this aft
ernoon:
Estate of W. A. Waller. petitions
and objections; estate OF A. j. Davis
settlement OF account and objections:
estate of Mary y. Turner. petition for
letters; estate of Juliu Reinhart. set
Element of account and petition; estate
or PAUL. +. w. Kroger. petition for order
of sale OF personal property; estate OF
Pelthier minors. petition for letters:
Joseph Hannigan ct al. VS.. Bernard
Berg ct al, motion to retax costs: Lee
W. roSter et al. vs.. Louis v. benuei
ct al, motion to strike and
of John O'Rourke; o. c. Abbott ct al.
VS.. John O'Donnell. settlement Of bill Of
exceptions: Rosa Dickinson vs.. Boyd
Dickinson. plaintiffs proofs: william
OfBrien VS.. the Butte General Electric
company. demurrer: N. j. B~.elenberg
VS.. Sam Nixon. motion to dismiss APP
peal: b. Hirschfeld VS.. @. A. Lobben-
berg. order to show cause; Cora T..
Ramsey W u ~ RtIrng Of al settle
ment OF bill OF exceptions.
The old-time case of Mary Schultz
against John O'Rourke was Yesterday