The sun., 1898-09-14
REYNOLDS MARRIAGE CASE.
MRS. C0RNELL's ELIMINATION ON a
CHARGE or PERJURY CONTINUED.

cHhRGE OF PERJURY CONTINUED.
lrrs. Klopman, for TestifyinE TO whose Al
legged Marriage 10 Reynolds Mrs. Cornell
IL Accused, Tells of Her Relations to
Reynolds : lrrs. Corneil's Teatimony.
The examination Of Mrs. Amelia J. Cornell.
accused Of perjury. which was adjourned on
Aug. 70 by Magistrate Flammer in the Centre
Street Court. came before him again yesterday
In Jefferson Market Court.
In suit for the annulment OF an alleged
marriage between Guy II. Reynolds and Mrs
Lillian Allen -Reynolds-Klo which was
tried In the Supreme Court before Charles
Donohue az referee. AIRS. Cornell testified that
she witnessed In Saratoga in 1883 the marriage
between Reynolds. under the name OF Stark.
and Mas Allen, as she then was. Reynolds.
who was thon n married man. saws that the
alleged second marriage to Lillian Allen never
took place, and TINT Mrs. Cornell perjured her
self in testifying under oath that she witnessed
II. Mrs. Cornell was represented by Benia-
min steinert OF the firm of Howe 4 Hummel
and the people. for Reynolds. by Vernon NJ
Davis and Charles Lex Brooke. At previous
examination Mrs. Allen Reynolds Klopman
lost her temper. and made vicious assault
on Lawyer Brooke and her mother. Mrs Crock
or. She was not present at the opening Of the
examination yesterday.
Mrs Crocker. mother OF Lillian Klopman.
identified number OF letters. written by Mrs.
Cornell, tending to vitiate the latter's tes-
timony. Charles B. Andrus, Justice Of the
Peace Of Saratoga. was called to prove that
Mrs. Cornell lived in Saratoga in 1888.
Mrs Klopman, who had Just arrived. ac-
companied by nurse and baby. then took the
stand and was examined by Lawyer Steinert.
When did you marry William Klopmani"
he asked.
''on Jan. 49, and again in June. 1897" said
Mrs. Klopman. casting angry glances at
Reynolds, who sat behind his counsel.
Were you ever married before?"
Eyes. In 1888. at the Empire Hotel In Sara
toRa. Mira. Alderman and Mrs. Cornell were
witnesses. and the Rev. Charles Sydney Dud-
ley married u.s. said MIRA. Klopman. She
added she and Reynolds hsd assumed false
wished his marriage kept secret from his fam
.,"Dtd you, have a marriage oOrtincatef" con-
!of course, but 1 intrusted It to. Reynolds,
and he has II with lot Of other valuable pa
SS Mra y KfOpRan Ss SaSsS tSSs sSe had not tysd
with Reynolds until lSS0. Three dead chill
SRS SaS s TrS K FnoT Re
y I hoteI q Irs, EaEles Because q the secrecy
%Wh9s other names, did he pass under'"
asked LAWYER Steinert.
and Stark" she said. sHe also registered uS
A. Ns.1 Hr; Z. and Mrs Reynolds at some hotels we
when did you hear Of Reynoldss other
II think in 1895. whom boarded at Fran
SsS SSst Rs @ sond nSs genus SSeDor Fear Ran
ed q separation. Then he said he had another
would prove we my W marriage. and he said / could
not. because the minister had not put II on
record. could not find DIR. Dudley, and Mrs:
Alderman was dead. 30 Mrs. Cornell testified
LAWYER Davis here took the witness for the
When did you first marry Klopmanp" he
5R :RSo sapsasSi ps4fcEinsa 1s27;n Il. oersmon,~
4 WIS SSpS 6etfa tsIl you"
marriage with Mr.. Klopman don't Affect this
case" said the witness ,,Ao, .. ,u. .h..
no mention OF the first marriage with Klop-
I'VE Claimed then, he coptinGed. that the
ReynoIds and MoPmap. When Rey9olds
wished to break On tiH there Vas russ sS ana % She
'eS % ess sHa asy Fc h@
We SaR thsSs TfS no tsssS that sbe had
SsT Ss that cons sai S sd@tssd da tSss p5s pre-
had lived at several hotels In q room adjoining
Klopman's, Tho latter had paid her board at
one time, when Reynolds Yves out OF money.
Said. Klopman had not know she was mar
He'd and In 1888 proposed to her.
Reoids aS' asSed fa%ger sTsr Sas Dss employed "
Did she not see his children by his other
VIII "How should I knowP she never told me;
she % knew nw E good deal; d.I, / don't doubt" re-
Did you, over see his 14-yOar-old child?"
continued the lawyer
wife e ssz or RG ss sSfFG sfe q Ss StefE
own VIZ. was living right in st, Louis the
same time you were. .s -. NJ.
Cornell on the stand on oath in her own de.
fence This Magistrate Hammer would not
allow, as he said there was no provision IN the
lowed her to mako statement.
II wish it put. on. record that offered to
haye heF sworn" said her Lawyer VIZ S..n n,...n.
ct the Reynolds Allen marriage and declared
emphatically that her former testimony to
that effect was true.
Lawyers Davis and Brooke here moved Tor
witness for the prosecution. Alta Edie OF Sara
toRa, who had failed to appear on subpoena.
They wished to prove they hey. ssid 8s that MTs;
that she testify falsely to having been wit
ness to the alleged marriage
Mrs. Klopman grew very angry and e1elted
Il object to such an adjournment unless Mr..
Davis will make afndavit that he has reason to
believe hia witness can 30 testify" Mr..
Hfas He sd can't do Il; it's % not true" said Lawyer
"We need all the testimony there Is In this
case. said imaaGlsifIote Gid Hammer rhbiammder' ana adT