The Wilmington daily Republican. (Wilmington, Del.) 1890-1902, 1898-07-20
COL. COOPER
ON THE STAND

| . -
-A- ~~s%
When Court convened this morning Mr..
Bird stated that by agreement with the
District Attorney the case of Charles H.
Butler went over to tho next term Of court
In September. Counsel for j. Frank
Alice. John r. McGonigle William X.
Cotter and Harry f. Foard made SINH
lar statement and their cases went over to
tho same term.
Then Mr.. Vtndegrift resumed his argu-
ment. He said that the counts that were
stricken out yesterday were stricken out
after hearing the evidence.
III those six counts the checks are named
while there has been much testimony as
TO checks on other dates His Honor will
toll you that was only TO fix tho intent.
The defendant In this case testified that
lie had no intention ofhavtng these checks
paid whom hs did not have the funds In
the bank. II therc was no ARRANGEMENT
between this defendant and Boggs then
why did he manipulate the books Of that
bank and why did he carry these checksp
Gentlemen. look at the situation. This
young man was defauter. Why would
be take this additional load? There Is no
other answer to the question but that there
was an arrangement. 1t il not within the
line of human possibility.
If there was an arrangement what
would Boggs have dones He would have
put down their checks. II he had done so
tbe whole thing would have been consid.
cred because kenney's account was one
| upon which the cashier was keeping tab.
what object had this defendant In having
such an arrangement This defendant
knew this young man was carrying others
he knew be himself was indebted and the
only way to got credit was to ask this
young fellow to take upon himself further
burdens.
Take the 81 $50 check " you please. Il
was given, and the shorih being pressed,
It was paid. kenney said 1t WAS given to
prutect the sheriff. What did he meapi
WINS the check to remain with the sheriff
until arrangements were made to pay for
tho farmp The sheriff received the money
for the check he same day he received 1t.
Take the $9N check. Boggs testified the
check was for his own benefit. The de.
.,.,n,,,.... A., NV w" oooP,'
..,,.,, H.. e "o'H
son contract l endeavored to prove when
the assignment was made aud cut off, Why
did no cut OF the assignment and hold
Clnrk's Fonrd's and McG0nigls's bonds?
,,,,,,,.,,". ana .r,'' NV ".op o"0 'No's
,,,'f '."' ""' w '''
,..,'' " ~. W. IVY "o ~, '"'s VI w io-
~ o "no" you oo'"' W
'a.so ''Ao INV '.e'' "'' 0"0 uoo"s"'aiS
=, p,'1"''u w. '"'''"no'"'' ""'.N'
ss'' ' oA'' "'.'ns0 10 0ii"0 ''i'S ue-
.s"u'"". VI 'uo 'ufo 'o"u''
'n v. a ~. VIII my u'n'"' VI 'no
' ~, '' WHO WOO o"S 0aso VI
e'o"" .o "'eu".'n' "'!esiy AZ
49,. w 'I :, n'e "o.e"u"AV 'Ao'n '"s 'us'
'"' '"'''
w. 10y w 'o"'' >''m "nu o''"0 ohd
'''e '' '" on, ."' o""' 10 '"e iosui''
INV eo"e','"D'o '.a' '"'' uei0"u"n'
an.m, .n' ,,,,n,a.. .',,",'s. .,.''
=. Wv, t..'... I"''A' vi. 20" ""'
:, 49,. ~ ''o"N
,sn. D'ss'
-, s
.,.,, ,,'>,,. 49,, .,
: t,,, =, ra.d h,s ,ntan,,. .,.
IA, ,r,n., S,n md ~ INV ,n.n s.vs. sa,
tho d,r.,,a,,t ala ,,,, ,,,,,,. ti,,,,.,s,,
~ h, o,,, month ,h.n do not ,,,,,o,,
,,,,, .,,, r,u,;.h .o iv,,.,.
,v,r, fr,,, w.,,,.,, NJ un,,,s ,,o,, ,ro,,,1
,,,v. :, o,,v,ct mi. aas,rd,,. w, o.u
,.v. b,,, ont NJ tb,s o.s, rhoro l., ~.
,'... i,. .,.,.
.
,, H., ,,,,
,,.,-,',,. H. a,,...,,,,....., 49,. - a..
, o 10y '."'
: s'0' .'''., ''
wv s'."'pn o . o'e. ~no" n po''
''o"''.'' ".N' w. y. WI.
=, w ~ "A' ''"A"'
- WV 'o'o'' W 'is eo".' 10 -" o1''D
.'o'. P'''"''.o" -. ""'." my ''"'"o"
'''''' $3.50 '. '"' '''' was
P''''''' WV h"o"' nv" "o 'oui"
ro"' '"'s o. " n"s . Wy: ts
"iis'lo'hor I" shy 'n"' 'hlsis u case Vi th'
JhNeo ot"tes against H. u. hohhey.
'ogss roDpeu 'he oanR' ITO went away
hd theh returned
ne doe' not say IL seems that tDat ROB
er ma hyphotlseu every officer OF the dov
rhmeht' Ihey cat with MIN, thoy drink
Vith MN, they walk arm ana arm with
I'm ana SGT up his word against the word
honest men. Inc case divides ltsself In
TWO clns'es-the carrying OF checksH AMI
Nc shaw Cuthbort ana Anderson checks.
he whole glst OF tho net OF Congress Is
,at there ihtsS DO the intent to lnJuiro
nj deirauu the BANK. IL henney Know
'at Boggs ever PAID ono OF his checks out
the funds OF tho bank then ho Is guilty.
verythlny tho Govcrninont has asked for
AS been produced.
lf kenney knew BoHgs was Carrying
= checks what was tho use of senlns
m notice OF these ovcrdrafts Again.
dn'i the bank losoa penny No.
Why did he ever make his account good