Evening journal., 1898-11-28
A DECISION TO- MORROW
Judges Preparing the Munich
pal Court Opinion.
A BIG MASS OF CIVIL BUSINESS

IlAEEAS CORPUS PROCEEDINGS IN
VERNON's CASE TO BE INsTI-
TUTED TOMORROW MORNING.
ALL OF SENATOR GRAY's CASES
CONTINUED.
When the judges ascendsd the bench
this morning Chief Justice Lore in
structed Crier smith to adjourn the
Court Of oya. and Terminer without
day, and to open the Court Of General
Sessions and Superior Court,
Prothonotary woolley called the
names Of the jurors. James T. Holt,
OF AppoQulnlmink hundred, failed to
respond Chief Justice Lore announced
that a certificate had been received
from a physician stating that the juror
was suffering with typhoid fever. Holt
was one Of the jurors In the Blackiston
case, and was not well at that time.
1Ae days calendar was taken up and
disposed Of
In the case Of Thomas e. Shea. d.
b. a.. VS. Agnes Kerr. p. b. r., Mr.. Pom
der for The defendant. said his client
was in New York, but that he would
be ready as coon as the Condon-Fen-
IsesGy trial had been disposed OF.
John II. Rodney had the case Of Rob-
ert S. Armstrong VS.. the road commits
s.Oners OF New Castle hundred carried
30 the foot Of the hst on the ground
that the recent election had changed
TWO Of the three defendants. and might
, materially alter the case He said that
: the commissioners would meet this
4 afternoon and consider the matter
. Harry Wliteman attorney for the
p.alntin, said that did not object to de.
3 ferring the case, but he wanted II tried
at this term.
Mr. Vandegrif,, attorney for the de-
fcrse I'm the case of Martin Martulir
VS. the Wilmington City Electric Com
1 pany. informed the court that Mr.
, Adair for the plaintiff, had promised
TO be present at 10 o'clock this morn
ing to explain that the case had beer
I settled outside Of the attorneys. Mr.
Adair was not present, Martulenl
j name wins called, he failed 10 respond
y and Judgment for the defense wal
4 given.
- In the case Of Lewis L. Wilcox. ad
minisirator of Johanna c. Wilcox, VS.
the Wilmington City Railway Com
Q pany. willard Salisbury, Jr. for tn
a defendant objected to II being on tn
{, trial list and calendar. saying that spe
n cial demurrers had been filed and tha
~ 50 was not at issue. Robert G. Harma
endeavored 10 have the case retaine
: on the hst, saying that he proposed {
have the special demurrers stricke
r out However the court overrule
IT him, and the case went over.
a Judgment for the defendant beloN
for want Of a narr was the order sc
cured by Mr. Vandegrlft In the cas-
h of the Diamond State Iron Company
r, d. b. a., vs.. Mary Dugan, p. b. r.
is Peter l.. Cooper informed the cOur
Ia THAT counsel had agreed 10 refer {
:, John II. Rodney the capiee case g
- Michael Butler VS.. the Republica
IL Printing and Publishing Company
The case Of Joseph Danforth Bus
vs. the Adams Express Company. wa
: set for trial on Friday.
r Az the instance OF Mr.. Bird the cae
Of John H. Bregger VS.. George {
re Schuyler and Annie Bregger. ]. c., VI
d, George G. Schuyler, were carried ovt
a. until December 49, lie also state
1- that in the case OF John Holland VI
D., the receivers Of the b. g. o. Railroa
Company a special jury would
10 asked for
q In the two cases Of John Greer v
ne the Arlington Mills Manufacture
Of Company, NJ Bird. for the defens
d. asked for continuance on the groun
that a receiver had been appointed
Wy the United States Court and that pres
ca dent Baldwin, OF the company, a mi
IS terial witness. was sick at his hOm
in I'm Baltimore Robert G. Harman d
We jeoed. Andrew B. Jones was call'
IN ard sworn He testified 10 the sickne
| Of Mr. Baldwin and to the materiaM
u- of his testimony. After the court hi
D instructed Mr.. Bird to secure a phys
Ie- clans certificate 1t signifed that
.e- would grant the continuance.
tb The case Of the Chester Steel Cas-
ing Company Va. the Wilmington M
leable Iron Company was reported 50
tied by willard Salisbury, Jr-
Continuance to the February ter
OF under peremrtory rule for trial W
r., the disposition made Of the case
Mary J. Austin vs.. Joseph T. Cough.
lei On application Of Harry Emmol
81 for m p.aintiff the case Of the Dupl
he Precs Company vs.. the Journal Prii
nj ing Company, was continued until /
,rr cember 10. the president cf the Dupl
Company being in Europe. He want
VI it carried over until neX- term,
ria Mr.. Vandegrift. for the defendant, 81
pie that he wanted the case tried at q
term il possible.
Judgment for the plaintiff, amou
to be ascertained by the prothonota
was the order in the case Of the M
M camille Printing Company vs. Chr
ge tian +. Sesterhenn.
or On motion Of Mr.. Bird the cases
,t- George c. Brown VS. Thomas Gre
.,.o & Son. and George c. Brown
Thomas Green were set for trial
ieu December 10.
Dry On application Of J. Harvey Viii
man. the case Of Frank A. Mitchell