The Wheeling daily intelligencer. [volume] (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1865-1903, 1898-06-06
IN Tue COURTS.

chi, court on Judge Paull's side came 10
a close, but Judge Hervey, Will hold
court today. 4
orders were entered In Judge Paull'h
court as follows: w
In tho case OF Clarence b. Gifren,, Ct
al VS.. Robert X. Glften, ct al, there waa
A decree for reference. Z, i'5
IN the case OF city Va. Paige, Carey G
Co., tho city filed a bill of exceptions to
commissioner Gilehrlst'a,report.
In the case of Emma Ebbert va.
George Snyder, ct al, Nora ]. Snyder
ras made pnrty. to the suit, and the
cause was remnnded TO rules.
In the case OF John w. Armstrong and
another vs.. J. w. kcnnen. ct al. the de-
murrcr was withdrawn, and an amended
answer to the blu was filed. said answer
being also In the nature OF a cross bill.
The cause was remanded to rules. N
In the case OF George L. burst VS..
Dora S. burst. the demurrer to the bill
was sustained and the cause was re-
manded to rules. N !.
In the case OF city va. Paige, Carey G.
Co., Alfred Caldwell. executor OF w, g.
Coshorn filed an exception to the report
Of the commissioner. n (
In the case OF Elizabeth Turner's nd-
mlnistrator vs.. w. H. Chapman and T.
T, IIutchisson, the objections to the nj.
ing OF three special pleas were sustain.
ed. Defendants severallv excepted.
In the case OF Kate Halter vs.. Samuel
Elders executor. the motion for a new
trial was overruled and there was judg.
rcnt on the verdict. :yTlF &
In the case Of Ellen Wolf VS., fPhllopena
Wolf, the court ascertuined that certain
property belonged to the petitioner
and gave her judgment. s5
In the case OF Lydia Wharton VS., ia.
cob Snydcr's executors, the declaration
was amended In open court, plea OF nom
assumps!t. plea Of dpayment, and plea
OF the statute OF limitation.
In the case OF George o. Smith VS., G.
F. Dickinson, the award was set aside
and annullcd. s
Samuel Kuglen was appointed a com.
mi,tee for o. .. Barrett, an insane per-
ton. Sis+
In the case OF Charles Muhleman vs.
George E. Kurner, the demurrer was
sustained.
In the case OF f. "A. Prltchard & Co.
vs. the Philadelphia Company, a new
TRIAL was awarded.
In the case OF John w. Kennen VS.. d.
H. Armstrong, the motion to set aside
the Judgment and award new trial was
orcrruled. A stay OF sixty days was
granted to enable the defendant to 20 to
the court OF appeals.
orders entered on Judge Heryey's side
we're as follows:
In the case OF the Commercial bank VS..
FIJI. LANCE. the answers were filed
In the case OF S. NJ. Fox and another
ys. B. Walker Peterson and others, there
was an order for security for costs.
In the matter Of the adoption OF
George Alexander Wood, favorable
decree was entered.
The case Of Adolph Knoke, ct al, VS..
Wood Bros. Planning Mil Company was
ordered docketed. 5s =
In the case OF z. c. Flaccus VS.. c.
floto and others. Christian Kalbltzer
filed a petition praying for an attach
nent, and also rendering plea in
abatement; objection overruled, secur-
{ !.y for costs given, and motion to quash
attachment overTlled.
In the case OF the Belmont Brick and
Tile Company vs.. II. D. Rumble, there
vas decree OF reference.
In the case Of Joseph Brown, ct al, VS..
I Wcadel Bros, ct al. the sale by the
trustee was set aside. ~
In the case Of the state VS.. George En-
bletn. convicted Of q felony, new trial
( was awarded. :
In the case OF George Salzer v. Benz.
Fisher. the motion for new trial was
Overruled and judgment was entered on
The verdict. OF the jury.
In the, case of Ada Korrell VS.. Amelia
C.rPate. the motion by plaintiff for a
new trial was oYerTuled and there was
Judgment for defendant. p Il
In the case Of Barbara Zillis' execu-
torvs Jennie A. ZIllis, ct al, the motion
ios new trial was overruled and there
was Judgment upon the verdict Of the
{, Jury. -,-,s y =.
ln.the case OF Poole & Purdy-vs. John
I Gator and Dennis Williams, the mo-
ZION for new trial was overruled, and
Judgment was entered upon the verdict
o. the Jury. A stay of sixty days was
granted to enable an appeal to the SUI
p;ene court
In the case of Frank Robrncht ys.
Henry Robrecht. the court was of opin-
ION that all the, items In the bill of par
ucu!ars except the first were sufficient,
. y