The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-11-06

/ Tho testimony OF John Cox was about
the snnie ns he gave the day before; with
the additional denals of statements made
by Mrs. Wilson, Mr. Robinson aud others.
Louise ogle was the last witness for the
respondent and she denied the truth OF the
statements made about her by Mr.. Powers.
| Mrs. Lawrence and Mr.. Holman.
| After the respondent had rested. WIN.
| Wilson, the husband of Mrs, Wilson was
! then called for the other side. He substan-
tiated nearly all OF his wifo's testimony;
and spoke of his ability aud desire to sup
| port tho child.
An attempt was made 10 show by Archie
| Anderson that II man lid told him that lie
(he man was the father Of EIwood ASTON
but the testimony was excluded.
Judge Shaw then had Willis committed to
Jail and adjourned court until b'clJ,k to-
day.
Tirty-nrth Ciyn pistr,rt Court.
The following proceedings were had in the
Fifly-fifth civil district court:
j.. +. Olcott Va. Sue l.. Lloyd ct al;
judgment by default for plaint!n for $7GS
and per cent interest from date Of nolcs
nnd 10 per cent attorneys fees and Gore
closure.
II. y. Olcott va. r. r. Dunlap; jadgmt Mt
for paintih fer sass interest nj per cert
and foreclosure.
f. f. olcou Va. -. W. nm; Judgment
for 1920, interest ut per cent, and fore
closure,
e. r. olcolt VS. Mrs e A, Taroor-
Ough; Judgment Tor $6iS interest at & per
cant, aud t-iceosurc
Central Texas Mining. Manufacturing and
Land company W John Sharer Judgment
by default for pl1in'iif for S325 - ANA in
tcreat al per cent aud foreclosure
Central Texas Mining, Manufacturing and
Land eompay VI james Marteni Judg
ment for plninun for $256J ana interest at
per cent and foreclosure
Atlantic Trust company VS. Jonathan
iiihle ct all Judgment for plaintiff for
Sli92 and interest at per cent and fore.
closure
i, p. olcott w. William A. Hail: n. T..
Phelps appointed to represent defendant
cited by publication.
3 Bfazorba Land and Cattle company VS.
Metue NJ. PaulScn: leave to plaintiff to
file amended original petition to make
lonia M, Jansen party defendant and con
tinued To perfect service.
Eek pario lctteiv Of naturalization Issued
ON evidence Of A. A. Learmore and John
! II. Brown
In the following cases the city Of iouston
Is plaintin and the following order was en-
| tered in each case wv. 3. Hunt ia an
pointed To represent the non resident do.
fendants cited by publication" C.. w Cole.
man ef al Hannah G. Norris Martin Van
! Buren Ct al; Ella IL. Godb Id e III. J
= u WhittleS6y; L22tc A. Sims a. nj. l1a n
! DeTreeso ct al; ~ H. Council; Fran,
x Hart; Harriet Goldbarrpw ct al, II. d.
Robinson ct AL Mary jackson ct M. NJ, 10.
Q Schaeifcr ct al.
Z Farmera' Loan and Trust company vs.. b
II. Gee; continued by plnintiif to make
q parties.
n The following eases were continual 70,
q service
G. Dillingham; Teceiver) VS. nominiot
Cattle company.
Charles Dillingham; (rcceiver) VS.. Coos,
II son & Wilson,
: Charles Dillingham; (recelver) vs., J. C
Turner
II Charles Dillingham; (recclver) ~, Jumb,
I, Thomas " Hubbar VS. e. H. Wahlr-n
y r. Y. Oleott VIZ. r. II. Jones. Il. p. OF
coil vs. John +, Wlllset; Enston & Rcnton
y vs., John pougherty Ct al; r. r. Olcott vs.
:, sue l.. III yd' Texas and New Orlean
i hailway company vs., L.. Gowia; T.. i
:; oleott VS.. W, +. poilan; T., p. olcott Va
" Chandler Y Mcclellan two olses) II. y
y, oleolt va. s u. Allgn 1.-TWO cAsos); II. T.
- Olcott vs. IL, q. Davis; r r. olcott vs.
J.. Alexander; +. +, olcott VS.. G. A
. Irtchins OF all + p. Olcott vs. II p
:; smith; +, =, olcott VS. H. r. Vinson G
!" AZ, =, 7; olcott VS. Agnes r. j. Wal
y. dron; Il, 7 Olcott VS.. j S. Archer, II. 4
" oiccqt W.. G. Rowln ct al; +, y. olcott vs
=, Crockett Rowan two eases); Il. +. Oicpt
~ vs. X. w, Mason ct al; i. +. Oleolt VS.
James nronham, =, j, Olcott VS.. u, NJ
"a Jones; X G, storrio vs. d. 10 Kennedy
~ ~ = Storrie vs.. J. II. Hallet ct al. r
.. Y. Storrio vs.. Elizabeth Achcnbsoh III al
" r. T ocott VS. p, NJ, Jones. u. p, ol
. colt vs., J, IL, Johnson, f. p Olcott VS.
=" CHARLES WolmN'c; Jano l.. Stanford rs
". James Rurneui II, r olcott VS. W. /
!, N1r,fs Ct al; Il p. olcott VS. j :, L,tch
/" Held q all +, p, olcctt Va, W. j Norrl
Z, ~ CIVIC easesl; T. r. olcott Va. w !
y. #, 7 olcoa vs.. Vim, A. Hail; Il. r. oi
w COT, w. Crockett Rowan ct al; T.. r. OF
us colt VS., VIM. r. Gin ct al; r. p. olco,
10 vs.. VIM a. Hall +. p, olcott VS.. ~. /
2, mcNally II L. olcot VS. s. W. Rennel
10, ulcrtt VS. James r. Tolbert ct a
- ~ y. olcott w. Chandler Y. Mcclellan ,
,ei all y, =. olcctt vs.. Gordon Hnyden. +
~ I. olcot VS.. n. " Holman OF al, y. i
-, uiec't vs., Noel q. Mason, II. p Oleott y,
10 Games y Carson r, r. oicott VS.. j. I
ne ccp,rai Tsxss Mining, Maautas,ur,r nm
,ar LAM company Va. @ + Harris. continue
=. = p olcott VS.. W. NJ. Blay,ooK. cor
rs mmnsa to perfect service. citation by publ
~ Real Estate transfers.
nv I've snii,v'iNs tra~sters ~ real ent.,
ma were Sled In the Office OF I'd r. rupre
aid county clcrk:
hit. n, T, clasen to H. r. Mccoy "a
aid acres In lots and 3, Rit. Nor
To ieAxue ..,...... ...... Fl,
re- g. 5 Baison, by trustee. 10 C,ai-
aid weston and Houston Investment
er. company, lot |. block ae. Fair
Grounds addition. 80. ~,
t s'I = Y, Lewis % Harris couaiy ~
tlrl miie acres. part Riley Mil
- tract, J. Austin grant, south side
~ BunAio bayou...... 49,.
-. Mrs, Cora y. Hsrod 10 6. VI. t,eri.
- ing. iot II. block -. Parker smith