The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-11-14
RECENT LEGAL DECISIONS.

| Voluntary submission to treatment for
| Goldnamcr VS.. o'Brlen (Ky.) &c l.. Il. A.
us, to preclude any right OF action against
other persons for inducing and aiding the
attempt. This is based oh the general rule
that the suit of wrongdoer viii be re-
jected when seeking redress for anothers
participation in tho wrong.
fictitious credit given by hank to n
nominal deposltor by entering 81 credit In
his favor and Immediately cancelng IL by
another entry showing that a check was
drawn for the full amount OF the credit.
but when the passbook of the depositor
showed the credit only. Ia held. In James
VS. Crosthwait tGa.) 80 l.. II. n. cal, 20
make the banker liable TO q perron who
sustained loss by relying on the appar-
ent credit, where he inquired OF the bank
err as TO 1t and was induced to htiiev" that
the entry in the pass5ook represented n
real credit
A cashiers check drawn by banker
upon himself ito tho order or another
SO l.. r. A. 65s, to constitute negotiable
instrument giving the rights Of bona
fide holder to one who received II from
an agent by mail In return for checks and
drafts mailed to the agent for deposit.
Payments TO a depositor during run on
bank and after the cashier had persuaded
some persons not TO withdraw their depos.
It's but when the bank has assets sufficient
so that It's officers expect to continue the
business and pay all debts ars held. In
Stone VS. Jenison fMichigan). SO l.. II. A.,
CTS. 10 be lawfully made and not to con-
stitute an Illegal preference to that &C.
positor, although the run continues until
the bank Is forced to suspend.
A claim that a bank was bound ~ apply
TO the payment OF a note which IL held a
deposit OF the frst indorser was denied In
First National Bank vs.. Peliz fpenDsyl-
vania), 20 l.. II. A., 1872, where the note
was made for his accommodation SO that
he, and not the apparent maker, WAS, as
between themselves. primarily liable ulon
IL.
A license tax on bicycle dJsd for peas
ure is held. in Davis VS.. Petrinobch taio-
bama). 36 l.. II. A.. 6f5, TO be unaaitn9r-
lied by charter provision for "yensle
license to be imposed on vehicles useu
in the Transportation Of goods and iaer-
chandise."
Presentment to all the makers OF note
is held, in benedict Va. schmieg wash
ington). 90 l.. Il. A., 7o3, TO be necessary
10 order TO hcld an indorser, whether the
note Is Joint In form or joint ami several.
The previous authorities on presentment
To Joint makers to hold indorsers OF
note are compiled in the annexation 10 tho
case.
The right OF a carrier receiving blastins
powder for transportation TO insist upon
such Limitation OF common law liability
as 1t sees 1T In sustained. in Cleveland
Powder Works W.. Atlantic and Pacific
Railroad company (cal), 80 L. n. A..64s.
on the ground that common carrier Is not
Obliged TO receive and transport such
dangerous articles. Annexation to the case
reviews the other authorities on the limita-
tion Of carriers liability and duty In case
OF dangerous articles.
For baggage left on depot platform By
q passenger who arrived at the place sitter
II O'Clock 1t night. when there were no