The Wilmington daily Republican. (Wilmington, Del.) 1890-1902, 1897-11-16
TRIAL LIST GONE OVER,
Scyenty-elght Cases narked For Trial in
Superior Court-Others Discontinued.

In Superior Court yesterday afternoon
the trial list was gone over and seventy
eight casos marked for trial. Tomorrow
number Of cases passed yesterday will be
considered and special jury trials arranged
for. These cases we're marked for trial:
Delaware Lodge, No. /, 10. o. f., vs..
George Allmon; Mary Mcnamara vs..
George l.. Little; Anna Booth VS.. the
Jackson & Sharp Co; John Little vs.
kins vs.. Henry G. Mahaify, samo ys.
same; William II. Terry vs.. John E. V.
Platt; William Fennemore VS.. Thomas A.
Hitch; John McNally vs.. Delaware Iron
Company; Joseph w. Sewell VS. VIII
mington City Railway Company; Thomas
IT, Cassidy VS.. John J. Crogan.
James L. Harve vs.. Paul Gllis; Sharp
G. Evans vs.. G. |. swayne; Trustee of
National Lodge, No. 80, |, o. O. 7. VS..
James Mullins adm; Charlie: &. Walter
VS.. Massachusetts, Benefit Life Association;
way Company; John Levy VS.. Paul
Gillis; Pom Steel Company vs.. Will
mington Mnlleable Iron Co; Michael II.
Hannigan's adm. vs.. Wilmington City
Railway Company; Adcaide H. She.
ward ". Wilmington City Electric Com
pany Howard D. Mercer vs.. James
Hardng's cxecuo or; Thackara Mani. Co,
VS.. Traynor & CO.. Peter c. Daley vs.
Paul Giliis; II. G. Cannon vs. p, W. &
William A, Scott; Amor ralley VS. Will
ming on City Railway Company.
Cathurine Y. Dougherty W.. B. & 2. r.
R. Co.; William .. Shallcross VS.. p, W.
Il B. X. r. Co Water Witch Steam Fire
Engine Co., ys. B. a. Z. Il. r. Co. Frances
Hughes VS.. Diamond Mach Co; Curell-
Hutchinson Lumber Co, vs. Kent and
Weeks; Condor Lane Boom and Lumber
c., VS.. Kent & Weeks; Cushman Brothers
Company VS.. j. Frank Mccoy; Joseph r.
Livezey VS.. Norris Wilson's exec cutors;
William Il. Finley VS.. Davis Pressed Steel
Co.; Lewis Louth and Ellen Louth VS..
John Thompson; Henry B. Duncan vs..
Paul ellis jesse Scott vs. w. IL N. Il.
r. Co. Harry Emmons VS.. Home lnsur-
ance Co; John b. Taylor vs.. Trustees of
Poor; Michael B.ager VS.. Patrick Fahey;
Ida j. Todd W.. Daniel w. Cush; John
Finer & Brother VS.. Quigley & Mullin;
Joseph L. Polk VS., Mayor & Council.
William II. Clair VS.. Wilson Barnard;
Iron Belt Mercantile Company VS.. Thomas
AicCcrkle; Frank Tory VS. j. E. Ad-
dicks; Il. c. Staats VS.. Cor, land Crock
cit: Martha L. Janvier vs.. p, W.'& b. II.
r.; Linton Smith VS. Seth A. Feastcr ct
a., Mary L Chandler VS. Richard b. Dun
can; William j.. Budd vs. Wilmington
City Railway Company; John SPAIN VS..
Anton Whitman; Frank 4. Mitchell VS..
Richard j. Guthrie ct al; James A, liel-
10y VS. Republican Printing and Publish.
ing Co.; ". T. Prettyman vs.. Edwin b.
Wlllinmson; George ;. Allinsun VS.. All
drew E. Jones; Thomas Il Shea vs.
AGn4s Kerr; William G. Ellis VS.. Charles
Nict;s: Prudential Insurance Company
VS.. Anna Cnrroll Waltor Burris vs.
Michael 5rrger; Thomas Il. Stevens Co
vs. Ada V, Cleaver
Anne Il. Each VS. B. r. Shaw; G. Beck,
VS. William Il. Carroll; John ID. Connolly,
vs. Mcconnell 4 Robinson; Hodson u Co,
VS.. George a. Wolff Martin Brown, VI. ii.
q i. Brewing Co.; Martin w. Brown, vs.
H. 4 f. Brewing Co.; Peninsula Lumber
Co, ". ltenry p Cannon; Union Nation.
10 Bank, Vi. William e.. Tindall; same vs..
,4mc; same vs. Charles Ii. Tindali; Same,
VS. same; same. vs.. 5. s. Adams; same vs..
same.
These cases were marked discontinued:
Use of the News Publ hing Co, vs. Pierce
Gould; Mary A. Ford vs. Metropolitan
Life Insurance Company; ]. T.. WICKER
sham VS.. Samuel Il. Clara; Lyle 4 Go. vs..
James Bombay, 'Jr., d Co. David Is. Mar
lin vs.. Joseph II. Gould; David Is. Martin
VS. Winiiald $, Quiglcy; William IL.
Money vs. G.. Il Crockett.
=. Many other cases wcro referred for the
time and continued until the February
term.