The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-07-20

,,oved Mr.. Blaine to utter
nrs su protest against the nssrs
' p,a begun upon those coi ,mnt ,bose
e. e,' ago They tell us .ha ,,, liz liz
.assrosaiions OF capital, py Su" 'on,a
~, ;naustrial warfare wbich sun
tne ,,s trom competition, can Ply,
esu'' sooas more cheaply, ana VIII
eir !, 1.-The hem more cbeapiy. rms rs
s SCI, over again. For years
~ nrotcction have Insisted
oss would secure our uoihostic
cturers against the coinpo' ,, ,ii,h Va
world .n these gentlemen wouiu Win
osonable time become rlch emou ,.,,
ana enough TO voluntarily reuuse .
ohe their goods. or II they dia not
" Voluntarily they would be
so On bv domestic competilioh'
,o ua many people to heileVe
',nsn,facturers when reiieved
ees competition would In tine oe-
fusn,, against each other: put
,ho believed this miscnicuia'el .'io
and intensity OF human sI,eu.
40 been as wise at frs, us uey
,a,,e through experience !hey
Dro Known that men who have long
', immunity from competition
o a every possible resource TO
W.. Immunity: and as for my
~ M, wonder that, having been
W. The apostles of protection 'nat
an he made rich ana poweriu' Wy
AVID from competition against lor
,boy should fully understand mat
Wv made richer and moro powerful
ns saved from competition among
lives. .,,
BILE.
friends Of protection can NOT assam
,,s without, admitting the democrat
sr,ion that Unrestricted competition
r.hle and that admission oyeriurns
y foundation OF the protective sys-
po,l,jesl parties must be consistent
nnsitions. and however honestly
rnhlicau party may be opposed 10
~ an indepenlent proposition. 1t can
i, will not oppose them II in DONG
Ends il necessary to attack. even ny
40 lis fayorite theory. 1t is not
&c, .Soraforc mai republican mem
his house. like the gentleman from
khusetts tMr. Waiher' nav, raw 49,, 49,.
IN defend the trusts. The country.
= will understand that the gontie-
AN, Massachusetts,. while holder in
eech has not been diffcren, in hts
lroh ,'i' 49, ,na ~ ,be dchate on
'nnlus " No. house ana In The SEN
" uo'n n ~ and parsis,cntly
na, .r,, os,ort IN destroy these UNI
n,t,,,,tc,s of cou{tnl. Let US,
.vl,o'i Inop Gov a. noncnt nj the at
~ Do two nar,i,s ou this question,
"a ureror,d n nm intended TO pre-
ore,rn comnetition. and Won avcrred
mas,;c onmns,ifion woull sufficient =
ura ,bo nr,ce inf all commodities 10
onIo We cnntroycrtod vour propo-
ard asserted that tho manufacturers
Nil country having hesn secured
toreIvn conn, i,-,on NV a protective
would secure themselves against do
competition nv combinations among
Ives. Thus the issue was made up
IKE entered upon the consideration Of
IN by paragraphs. and at he very
II opportunity we tested your con-
! in your position. To The first para
Of the bill We offered an amen imcnt
provided that # tho domestic man
rers did combine TO escape domestic
tltiOn they should have no benefit of
rotectlon against f3foien competition.
tu gentlemen join IFS in this PROPOSE
S We had a right 10 expect, If You nrc
in favor OF competition No, sir;
gentleman on that side voted to sus-
ruling of the chair which refused
Pre an opportunity TO pass upon the
on, and your party in lhe senate has
"a a similar course Gentlemen we
as well be candid with each ether
because no evasion can save Won be-
ne country = you are rIsh' IN as
mat protection wiz defend our own