The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1897-07-20

cratic side at this question. but it was
drowned II q perfect storm CT as5oro, u
that greeted Mr.. Bailey's reply that never
as long as he was in congress would ns
vote for so per cent IN wooden go-ls
ana no duties on raw woods. The Repub-
leans and the galleries joined in this
demonstration.
How could the gentleman from Tenn
sssse, ne concluded when the applause
mad sueOslded, vote for free wool in the
lace lace OF the chicago Platform, which he
The Chicago platform did not take the
BACK track on the principle of tariff for
revenue, replied Mr. Mcmillan.
7 IL prove that It did answered Mr..
Bailey. rs Mr. Robertson. Of Louisiana.
in the honse?'' he asked. looking about
him.
But Mr.. Robertson was not present. and
Mr.; BAILEY proceeded 20 argue thar tne
chicago platform did return TO the ..old
Democratic theory
He Sad the present Democratic organ
ration sought to rescue the party from
those who were wrecking il. When the
party was making new recruits the
wreckers had deserted it. When he re-
pudiated the Cleveland heresy, and
announced the doctrine that AL the
taxes should be laid for revenue. the
Democrats in sympathy with him cheersd
Justify Mr.. Bailey spoke Tor about two
Mr.. Mcmillan Dem. Tean) who had
70 minutes of his hour remaining, con-
stunned this time in denouncing the sugar
-
Ooo,eO to the price of sugar certificates
today, and in replying to MIR. Bailey
remarks about his record. Any state
ment from any quarter that he had ever
advocated duty on wool. Mr.. Mcmillan
declared. was unjust TO him and incor-
rect He had been consistent.
BAILEY'S PAST.
Moreover. Mr.. Mcmillan, in turn, delved
into Mr.. Bailey's past and 3o:nted out
occasions when the Lone Star statesman
mad voted for free coal. free barbed wire,
tree sugar, and even free wool. in the
Ffty-second congress. Mr.. McMiil!n's
comment OF the inconsistency of Mr..
Baileys free wool vote caused much mer-
riment.
In conclusion. he appealed to the De-
mocracy TO go into the battle again. with
It's banners bearing the old notices.
MT Bacley got the floor after Mcmillan
nnlshed long enough TO say that when he
cast the votes referred to by Mr.. McMl-
Ian the endorsed doctrines of his party
was for free raw material and as a Dem
ocrat he supported its platform. He now
held a commission from the Democracy
to oppose the doctrine and he should
do
Mr.. Payne and Mr.. D.ngley success
lVely took the floor for some closing re-
marks. The former devoted his time to
a defense OF the sugar schedule. He fig
ured out dimerential in favor of the re-
nner IN the present law at the prices pre-
yailing in 1894 of 521s cents per 100 pounds.
taxing Mr. Swanson's illustration OF the
= SS5A &C SuEdIS- t41T. Rdyne figured on
the basis of the amount of raw SUGAR
unrehned ql412 pounds) that the refiner
under the present law had a differential
Oh ;Sl4 per 100 pounds against .17S differ
entlal AZ the proposed schedule
MI Dingley avowed that the schedule
gave a slight additional protection to re-
nned sugar. about the same time II raised
raw all along the line. Trusts. he said
could not be eradicated BY eoithets.
The way to break down trusts he
cried, IS 10 establish a beet sugar fac
tory IN every congressional district in
the country and make competition. That
is the way TO clip the wings of the
Among storm of cheers. Mr.. Dinglev
tnen demanded the previous question on
the. ADOPTION OF the conference report
The demand was sustained by a viva
Voce vote, and the vote on the ADOPTION
OF the report followed by yeas and NAYS.
considerable excitement occurred while
the vote was being taken When the
speaker announced the vote. 1S5 ayes and
iis nays, the Republicans broke into loud
cheers The house then, at l2:I7 a. m
look recess until Wednesday.