The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-02-01

,r :, ..,.,.,,., a.,.io, ,rov,d,rg
for filling vacancies in Office which occur
before an annual election at which state
| officers are to be elected.
deposit OF public money by county
treasurer in hank DESIGNATED By him as
I'll. 80
given bond to secure its repayment Is
| npia, IN Aiiioon" VS.; Ames =. ~ 90 H. ~
,,eani,,, nov W 'uns''.u. ~ 'V 80 ~ aurb
funds unlawful.
An ex mario order FOR n recciyership of
! ,-o,,r,,, ,.,,. l.. ,,o,o,,o, aud
appointing date three months distant ior
showing cause why 1t should not be con-
tinued' is held. In State tx rel 81. LOUIS
n. ana - Z. Railway company VS. wear
snhioc, -" o., :" " o. ~ We inr ", on tba
sro,,,d ~, :, W." WY, vi ,hn i,,r,sJIc,,nn
~ ,ha ,n,a ~ 1 ~ ~ s''. -. ,,,,,hon,
onnnin,ir,s w. So "a. 49, ~ ,h,, hor,in
'' '"e
To cntitle Judgment creditor to an OF
der appointing a receiver of his debtors
property it is held necessary in Minkler VS..
United States sheen company IN. DD 81
+ u rie ,,., l., 200, ,,t,h ovh,,s,
nv 10 s'VN
ms refnenles nj law, when usually Wouiu
satishci' me annexation % the case re-
bsustirc re,,oeiio. =, =" ,"o sonji,ion n,
receivershir.
"n oi'er ny cohsisnee Oh Soous W
carrier LOT Tue delivery thereoi on payment
OF freight charges is held. in Jeffris vs.
Fitchhurg Railway company (Wisl SO L.
r. A. 35i. to give no greater right to the
carrier than the consiguee had as against
n claim of stoppage in ttansitu.
death IN n rie,o t., oors,aoro,,o, NJ bor
living with and to,,;r,. ooro ~ tho nromIs.
or. is denied sneci.J performances IN Owens
vs.. McN,lIv zeal, % H. 3eo where
the promsor had subsequently married and
!cft wife surviving him who did not know
oil the contract when she married MN.
The erect OF the amendment of a statute
to remedy constitutional objections is
shawn hv v-,,e, ,r c,,,, 40 rl co,,,oe
-, 900
'in"'' 90 a. H. a. "'z' III "hlch statute
held unconstitutional because It did not
apply to all counties OF the cato was made
valid by an amendment extending its pro-
local passenger railway huilt along
''rhi'No road' outside the UNITS OIL city
unuer previous purchase from lhe TURN
p'He company without any FRANCHISE OF con-
cessloh conferred by the Guy Is heid' IN
Baltimore VS.. Baltimore c, and Il. NJ. 7.
Railway company tMd.l IS l.. X. A. SOB. |
not TO 10 street railway after the cX
tension of the limits of the city to include
a portion of the road. within the meaning |
way lines
" ''9"' w
'NN ~ .u'''e
us right is heiu' III hipp vs. EiWeii tNilhh)
81 l.. K. A. i35 to be unconstitutional for
lack OF due process of law. A DELAY of sew
eral DAYS after TAX sale. before payment
of the hid and eyecution ~ Tho decd which
to the purchaser. and purely for me tax
collectors convenience. is held, in Judah vs.
hro'hers MISS % u. II. A. SOL TO DC I'M
a IN
clutles the authorities on the necessity of
immediate payment on tax sale.
Failure OF temporary operator TO con-
meet his instrument with the telegraph line
for fe,v hours is hold In RirLctt VS. wcs,
-. 40
erh Union ic'esrapn coinp"h! 'Nlc"-] %
L.. R. \. iOi, not to constitute gross negli-
gcnce" which will make tn, conpanv liobIe
for the CONSEQUENT DELAY of an unrepeated
message while there is a valid stipulation
otherwise eycent for The nmount Maid for
sending tho message
statute proyidine for struck iurics !,
.,.,a,na, ,,,.,.,,. g.
'' 'o'ii"ien 's' ''hHeapo''' vas
Light company tMinn.) 81 l.. X a. 49,,
against the contention that II violates the
rjebt IN tr,a, hv ,urv aud tho r;cht to oh.
tain t,stico fr.o,v o,d u,ithou, rnrohasa
iurv is reo,trod ~ nav ,hn ownonso tbcroos
without any allowance therefor in the taxa
ton of costs.
MI, - IT.,
i"o Po"V' VI er'in'"a' court 10 require