The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-08-25

asss That Arc % TIE rifty-lIfth
District Docket.
6oN. v. 4. WILSON, JUDGE PRESIDING
- rurI List Of An Cases which Were
Transferrsa 80 the new
Court.

]Wilson judge:
CITY Bank OF Houston vs.. Cohen ct al D..
4 III. vasmer W. s. M. williams; a. ~.
lHitchIer ct al W. T. H. scaulap Charles
Nottingham, receiver, vs. Cookson WIZ
i Non: Easton & Rintoul vs.. J. A. stare
34rarners' Land and Trust company vs.. D.
24F. Gee; G. Dillingham;, receiver. vs.. DO
4 lmtniou Cattle company; J. d. Goodman w.
I'M. T. Jones Lumber company; s. n.
jlJones vs.. Warren Lumber company; George
hi. Hermann vs.. Galveston. Harr'spufg
Hand San Antonio Railway company; 7. >.
,1Buffinger VS.. Emma j. Jones CT al; ..
i{J. Hoffman VS.. Isabella Boyd; j. o. ~.
ftKtntt VS.. T, r. Bonner, receiver: I. u.
kk(nbb VA. Houston Belt and Magnolia Park
SxRailway company John Kennedy w. Aug
! {Renter; Kate Howard w. Angelena VIII
ka1fanas. A.. j. Fostall vs., G.. W. Boco;R !;
sxHouston Land and Trust company vs.
&c. Walker ct al, V, NJ. Frost vs. Peter
iiGabel; William Hartley vs.. Thomas Martin
Net al; Charles Dillingham;. receiver W.. a.
10. Turner. j. p. Alvey ve. Bayou CITY
stStreet Railway company; Meien1a' hcy'
Ssnolds VS.. SAN Antonio and Arkansas Pass
fsRailway company; G. Dillingham; receiver,
VS. Jumbo Cattle company, william wal
Mace w. Southern Cotton OIL company;
fNsaac Heffron VS.. Otto Erickson Isaac Heff-
fSron vs. Mrs. G. Oldham; Isaac iieffron vs..
lsR. G.. Ashe ct al; Isaac Hebron VS.. X. Nc.
N Rae ct nj; Isaac Heffron vs.. ). NJ RUSH
\ more; John b. Lord executor, VS.. II u.
iysRice ct al, Isaac lleffron Vs. Hal Bates;
! 8WilIiam Slocum w. David Russell; A. J.
Wick VS.. heirs OF Fl. Dickinson, ON appeal,
isAnnie Il. Robinson vs. II. i. Amber;
IsChrls Moerlln vs.. James Appeby ct al;
s,E. N. Chopper vs.. j. Z. Hutchinson ct al /,
INV. e. HALEY vs., Ransom Sutton; w u
s'FIIailey VS. George Mario; Frederick Cole vs.
l1John II. Burnett; w. l.. Bakor, executor,
5yys. e. H. Ehenborg ct al A. A. Moore
livs. Frank Dunn Lotman Bros. Manufac-
..ruring company vs. Houston Water Works
company; w e. Humphreyville Vs. Hous-
-iton Ice and Brewing company ct al iious-
4 ton Land and Trust company vs.. Thomas
aTinsley ct al; Mutual Building aud Loan
J.. association VS.. II. c, Berkeley Ct al, j T.
go CONNER vs.. Marpnnna Caness; Virginia.
ssM. Frost VS.. William d. Nichols, Thomas
III. Hubbard VS.. Il. II Waldron Houston
n Iand aud Trust company vs.. George Il.
\. Walker ct nj; Meyer Bros, Drug company
sfNs. w. j. Coulter at al; II. G. Mckay VS..
.fIIenry G. Pye; Charles II. Newman Va.
/ Intcrnational and Great Northern Railroad
!. company Don willard Austin va Calves
ee,tcn City Street Railway company; Isaac
,tHoffron w. George u. Dickcy ct al Emma
Il Corvllle vs. Gulf, Colorado and Santa Ne
,tfred lJsin,y =, H. n n unmno va M.
81 MI. 49, =, ~ AZ ~ e,,.iit 80,
n prnwo ~ al. w II Thon,oa ~ al q.
l,JJ Rev., "a IVA, 90 .,.,,,,,,, III Wv
..nanv Mn,-r n,,,,c,, ,rhanar ~. W,ntn",
NC. Heinsz; s, ID, Moore vs. u. S. Artusy;
y meyer, Sehuar y Otfner Il Co. VS.. \.
Is Freed y Co, John 7. kuhm1n vs. Thos
i Martin ct all D. T. Mayberry VS. q, W
4 Mutval nu,,di,y ond ,,',n assoo,a ,,nn 80
iThrroa. p,inrh,,,s. y, - =, cion', 20
n II y,rnas,s m.,,r, 10 - ~, Oie' "a Vs.
lJam.a rhnrltnm A,hert ,nnss i" VI ~ IL w.
!, rin Him. uous,on Iand AVA ,rrns, ,,,,
panv vs. r q Prince ,Io, men, '"'r Vnn ,'1
!, Trust comnanv vs. ~ Crpsh,, ~, " ni
! uons,on + and o,s ,r,,,,., S.usu? " a.
lli,nor,n ", 1 Inh, iruae uui,'%,y W. W-
IIndor "s,' VI soi" ma, NV usenn' muEeho a.
y pass ,,s 70 , 49, - r n ei ti, ho'nus ~
( Iohn y xvsi, ss ~ al W. -. - J., o'eo,t vs.
4 Sins po., MI ~ a, r,.li,y ureehWa,l vs.
~ a',a 'r ,r W M 19nn Sinltn W. lious-
Mandy M,y SaS =. NS Az is , oonpeny
pnroaksr W. Iames IT ~ So,, mOg''; ".p,Es u
y ~, w. James u, remnant Alfred RrlL-
\ Eas,an q NJ W wv OF houston et al :
~ " %, ass.'oui W. IoEh nausberty ct al
Il -. ~. o'e"s, W. sue H. Loyu j. NJ.
4. C',. vs. 5acop hlnzi H. G. storrie VS.,
4, So, ~ ne,niinni T. 9. Storrtc VI.
IL xsr.5n- " nus .'Aes W., W. y,
fononnaus et al j. n. Willard VS. Emery
Iopp' ., u, sam VI. William II. kurth
INN "a D. H. keskeli ct nj VS., Henry
L rreuild; Annie 9, McGcrry G, al VS. Clti-
q uesis Eiectrlc Light and Power company
1 MIS-. Ella Provannzano Va. Ed A. Flew
4 cletf; George J Drumming VS.. San Antonio
y a.n ARKANSAS Pass Railway company; A. c.
Huhter vs.. Laura NJ Gregor; Texas and
rev orleans Railway company VS.. l.. Go
\ VIM +. r. 0lcott vs.. W. +. Pollan; II. p.
Oicott vs.. ]. Y. Bates: II. r. olcctt VIZ,
Ghandler Y. Medallion; r. p, Olco,t vs.
Sue =. Lloyd ct al: II. =. Olcott VS., Chan
Il dler <. McClelland; II. p. oloott va s, Il.
II Alien; +. +. Olcott w. S. u. Allen; f..
=: olcoit Va. l.. G. Davis; Il. p. olcott VS..
!, w 7. Alexander: II. r. oloott va. q. A,
i Hutchsns ct al; T.. p. Olcaa vs.. ii. H.
Snith; r. +. oicott vs.. u. Nj. Jcnes,
h F. p. Olcott vs. ". NJ. Jones: II p
Y Olcott Va j. H. Johnson ct al: n y ~
y colt W.. Henry l.. West. T.. y. olcott Va
Il Cbas, Wetmore; Annie Il. LYONS 81 nj ys
/ Fred Schneider ct al; Isaac Uefyron ,,s
I Lillian N Cunningham o, al, Isaac uef.
Z from vs. j @. Walker and wife. Isna,
\. Heffrcn VS.. John Cubbos "a ~. isaa,
Il Hebron vs.. Mrs. s. o. Lubbock. Ian,
4 Hebron VS.. Soloman Lewis a nj, Isaa,
G Sssr IL. LSois s,, ys r oconasr; j Nc
Great Northern Railroad crmpany' J wv wv