Birmingham state herald., 1897-04-28
 SUPREME COURT DECISIONS The john G. Bradley Case Ar- gued and Submitted. CONSIDERABLE INTEREST Manifested In the Decision Which Is Yet 0 Be Rendered. Birmingham We'll Rep
 resented at Court

Montgomery, Ala, April 27.-(Special) --IAe following decisions were rendered by the supreme court today:
 Brickell c. J.-Steiner Bros. vs. First National bank, appeal from Blrmingham city court; motion to dispiss appear over ruled and judgment reversed and cause remanded.
 Mcclellan, J.-Louisville and Nashville Railroad company vs. Cicero Woods, ap- peal from Morgan circuit court; reversed and remanded.
 l. ]. watson, ct all, vs. J. J. Herring, appeal from Dale circuit court; reversed and femanded.
 Chas. Henderson, surv. part. vs. F. M. Prestwood, appeal from Coffee clrcudt court; affirmed. -r
 Coleman, J.-Wilkinson Banks x Co. vs Sarnpel M. Buster, appeal from Law renee chancery court; modified and af- firmed
 A. ]. Williams vs. L. Hendricks, appeal from Pike circuit court; reversed and remarked.
 Head, J.-John F. Scott vs. s. P. Ryan, ct al., appeal from Morgan circuit court; affirmed.
 Amanda Barksdale, ct al., vs. Emma Dacis. ct al, appeal from Montgomery city court; affirmed.
 Haralson, J.-S. H. Bergess vs. Amerl- can Mortga ge company, of Scotland, linn tied, appeal from Pike circuit court at- firmed.
 J. P Altgood vs. Bank of Piedmont, appeal from Calhoun chancery court; affirmed.
 trar1acted by the court today:
 Asa Cp.ffth Ws. ]. H. Karter, from CuW- maIn circuit court; submit ed c'n briefs
 Nancy Thompson ct al. vs. J. c. Roberts & Co.,, from Faye,te circuit court; leave to sever and submitted on briefs.
 w. H. Calt.sr vs w. ". Whatley from Jefferson circuit court; submi ted on briefs.
 o. A. Steele, guardian, etc, vs. F. c. Donehoc, administrator, etc, from Blount probate court; submitted on briefs.
 M. J. Bailey vs. A. G. Levy x CD. et al, from Lamar charcery court; submitted on briefs.
 lG. J. Holllngsworah vs. S. H. Hill, from Pickens circuit court' submitted on briefs.
 H. W. Lorg. admimst ator vs. William R. Kirlg from Walker chancery court; suhrn.tt.d on briefs.
 Maggie Moore vs. Thomas Price ct al.. from Walker charcery court; subml5ed an briefs.
 Wm. Wood & Son ct al. vs. Riley, Peb- blas & Go. ct al, from Walker chancery court; leave to ssWer anid submitted on briefs.
 Birmingham Building and Loan Associ- aLtion vs. J. w. Boggz, from Jefferson circuit court; submitted on briefs On motion and merits.
 Aiber Mayer. pro ami, vs. ThcmDson- Hutchiso;' Buil1ing association. from lief ferson circuit court; argued and submit ted
 Southern Railway Go. vs. F. L. Bush ct al. sadntri1tra,tor, etc. from Birmingham city court submitted on briefs
 Birmingham Building and Loan Associ- ation vs, the State of Alabama, from Jefferson circuit court; submitted on briefs.
 The State Of Alabama vs. the South ern Railway company, from Birmingham city cour: submitted on briefs.
 lB. P. Brirdley vs. Anrde Brindley, from Cunman chancery court; submitted on briefs.
 James A. h1oMinn vs. Mary B. Karter, from Cullman chancery court; submitted on briefs
 Louisville ard Nashville Railroad com pany vs A. K. Sheppard, Jr., from Bir- mingham city court; argued and submit ted.
 Alex w. Jon;s vs. Johu M Caldwell ct sls,, executors ct al., from Jefferson chaneary c9ur.; submitted on briefs
 John B. Sanford vs. Glenn A. Hamnar. from Fayette charcery court submitted on briefs.
 Wm. R. Hcots, Jr.. vs. John Wilia ms cit al, from Lamar cfnancsry court; sub nittef orl briefs.
 IA. Fl Fields vs. Drennen & Co.,, from Brour1 ctancery court; submitted on briefs.
 A. D. Fields vs. A. J. Clayton, from BlourDs chancery court; submitted on briefs.a
 J. ". steen vs.. George H. Sanders,