Mexico weekly ledger., 1897-06-03
Circuit Court Docket.
JUNE TERM, 1897.

NAAg
5 w. K. Potts vs.. r. r. Arnold,
continued.
6 st. Louis Trust Co. VS.. w. L.
Rennolds, by consent contin-
2 E. Fl. Gregory VS.. G. O. Elliott,
leave to answer in 60 days and
continued.
8 ]. w. Dowell, Collector, We. 8. W.
See, continued.
8 Sarah j. Shoppert, respondent,
vs.. 8. P. Martin, appellant, re-
manded with order.
10 State ex rel w. @. Mansfield VS..
j. M. Riley, mandamus.
IL George w. Adams assignee of F.
B. Vaughn, order of sale and
continued.
SECOND DAY, JUNE 8.
- Bart Burrell vs.. Annie Burrell,
ordered published and con-
tinued.
10 A. K. Yancey ct al VS.. National
Life Association, new trial and
continued.
IA George w. Adams, assignee, vs..
Mexico Savings Bank, contin-
ued at plaintiffs cost.
Is G. w. y. Cobb va. VIM. Dickin-
6ob1 SShtlhuOas
is Chas. Threlkeld VS.. Este Threl-
keld, alias and continue o.
IL E. b. Gregg VS.. Geo. W. Adams,
assignee, continued by con-
sent.
1S City of Mexico VS.. John Caldwell,
continued at defendant's..cost.
THIRD DAY, JUNE 9.
10 Advance Thresher 90. VS.. Pierce
& Erisman, leave to answer
and continued.
20 @. B. Rouss VS.. R. L. Holloway,
continued.
q R. 8. Barnett vs.. @. & A. Railroad
Co., continued at defendants
cost.
% P. Helwig, appellant, vs.. Geo.
Bohan, continued.
% Lakenan & Barnes vs.. Elliott &
McNama, j. H. Scott, garni-
shee, leave to amend answer
of garnishee and continued.
"a M~artinsburg Bank vs.. Elliott &
McNama, j. H. Scott, garni-
shee, leave to amend answer
of garnishee and continued.
25 w. B. Canterbury ct al VS.. John
Doolin ct al, order of sale re-
newed and continued.
FOURTH DAY, JUNE III.
% George Burke & Go. vs.. Chas. R.
Webster.
q Southern Bank of Mexico VS.. A.
J. Powell.
% Jesse Davisvs. A. Demings ct al.
% ]. W. Harper VS.. Jas. M. Beagles
ct al.
80 Caleb Berry VI R. A. Daniel ct
81 Dulcie Young, admir-, vs.. @. O.
Gentry.
80 Addie L. Hathaway vs. Paul Abat
ct al, leave to file answer LIST
day of next term and contin-
ued.
80 Lloyd Mcintosh vs.. Sarah McIn-
tosh ct al, commissioners ap-
pointed and continued.
"a Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.
vs. O. G. Baker ct al, contin-
ued.
| FIFTH DAY, JUNE II.
So Silas Wilson vs. Wabash and O.
& A. r. r. Cos, continued by
consent.
SO George Boomer Va. Wabash and
| G. &. AT r. Co.'S, continued
by consent.
81 j. J. Bick VS.. W. P. Layne, con-
t1nued.
So j. j. Bick VS.. D. N. Richardson,
alias and continued.
80 J. j. Bick VS.. B. +. Tomlinson,
40 j. j. Bick VS.. John T. Hisey, bond
in go days or deposit $40.
Al j. j. Bick vs.. B. F Miller, bond in
80 days or deposit So.
AZ Allie Turner vs.. W. 8. Turner.
SIXTH DAY, JUNE IL.
43 R. NJ. White vs.. Union National
Bank of Kansas City.
A Caleb Berry VS.. John Caldwell ct
45 H. w. Wheeler & 90. vs. Mark
Pitcher.
46 Thomas Rector ct al VS.. John
Rector.
Al Daniel Klock & Co. VS.. Jacob
Bick.
48 L. E. Bass vs.. ALA Bass.
40 Sallie Lyons vs. Chas. Lyons.
SEVENTH DAY, JUNE IA.
so B. Fennewald VS.. Elliott & Nc
Mama, j. Fl. Scott, garnishee,
continued.
81 8. W. Buckley, admir-, vs.. Elliott
& McNama, Phoenix Insurance
Co., garnishee, continued.
81 E. o. Snedeker VS.. s. G.. Elliott,
Phoenix Insurance Co., garni-
shee, continued.
So ]. P. Galloway ct al VS.. G. & A.
r. r. Co.
"a Hamilton Hall VS.. VIM. g. Harri-
son and T. A. Mcintyre, leave
to answer in 80 days and con-
tinued.
55 j. T. Sumner ct al VS.. e. E. Sum-
ner ct al, order of sale and
Sc Southern Bank of Mexico vs..
Mark Pitcher, continued.
EIGHTH DAY, JUNE Is.
81 Rebecca E. Wise vs. M, K. & T.
Travelling Mems Accident As
ISOLATION, continued.
IS Rebecca E. Wise VS.. Iowa State
Travelling Mems Association,
alias and continued.
SO Rebecca E. Wise 70. Travellers
Protective Association of
America, continued.
go Haywood Boot and Shoe 90. VS..
Jacob Bick, leave to amend
petition in 30 days and con-
tinued.
81 A. E. Nettleton VS.. Jacob Bick,
leave to amend petition in 80
days and continued.
81 Roland Mitchell vs. Lizzie Mitch
So W. A. Ednonston ct al va. ]. B.
Picket ct al, T. G. Blakenn,
garnishee, answer and con-
tinued.
NINTH DAY, JUNE 16.
GA Desnoyer Shoe Co. VS.. Medley &
Morgan. continued at plain
So Wear-Boogher Dry Goods Co.
vs.. Medley & Morgan, contin-
ued at plaintiffs cost.
SO Scott-F Force Goodbar Hat 90. vs..
Medley & Morgan, continued
at plaintiffs cost.
81 r. P. Smith Sons 20. VS.. Medley
& Morgan, continued at plain
tiff's cost.
6s ]. A. Lamey Manufacturing Co.
vs. Medley & Morgan, contin-
ned at plaintiffs cost.
SO Thomas & Hayden vs. Medley &
Morgan, order publication and
continued.
20 Harvey & Morgan VS.. J. N.
Stephens, continued at de-
PENDANTS cost.
TENTH DAY, JUNE IL.
II Sudie M. Enslen VS.. James En-
slen.
70 State ex rel 8. G. Bunstine vs.. @,
E. Casper, continued by con-
sent.
70 Jas. NJ. Beagles VS.. @. @. Rags
dale. leave tn amend in thirtu