Pine Bluff daily graphic., 1897-09-08
PUzzLERs IN COURT.
THAT HAVE KEPT THE LAW.
 YERs GUESSING.


 Curious Questions Raised ln Courts of Low,
 All Countries eontfEDute 8 Share <
 What Would Make an Interesting yoa
 nme-seyeral Examples.
 An interesting volume might be writ ten on the curious points of law that are constantly arising in the courts The most expert fawyers and judges ars frequently puzzled by the novel situa- fons i'll which they are placed.
 One of the most curious points of law cn record arose recently iii a court at Jersey, i'll America. The question was whether eggs, after reaching a certain stage of incubation, were 10 be regarded as eggs or chickens. After quarreling about the matter for some time, counsel offered to break one of the eggs to sat isfy the law that it contained chicken. in which case, of course, the eggs would have been considerably enhanced in value, but there was general demur to this suggestion, and the justice re- served his decision til he had consulted his colleagues. The result had not come to hand at the time of writing
 A remarkable case i'll France excited great deal of attention some time ago. 4 gentleman dining on the terrace of Narbonne restaurant let a bank note fall into his soup. He laid it down on the table to dry and gust of wind blew it away. A passing dog swallowed the note, aud the gentleman detained tho animal, whose collar happened to bear it's masters name. Indignant at his loss, the owner of the note sued the dog 8 master for 100 francs, the value of the note. There was much legal hair splitting, but at length the court ordered the owner of the dog to pay the money.
 Another French case was that against Paris hairdresser, who was sued by lady for -e60, being the price of her damaged locks The fair claimant had used tho hairdresser 5 wash, which was said to restore fallen locks, but the result in this case was to burn the hair off com pletely The point was the liability of the hairdresser, and the court awarded the lady e8
 Applications for injunctions often raise curious points. Not long ago an injunction was granted to restrain an officer in the life guards from keeping horses in a London drawing room, the ground of objection being the noise which the animals made, which annoyed the neighhors. Ths offending officer is now in a lunatio asylum.
 There was figDt not long ago in one of the London courts between barrel organ and q piano. an injunction being claimed to restrain gentleman from keeping an organ. 1t seemed that the offender was annoyed by his next door neighbor's piano, and to avenge himself he obtained barrel organ, which he played at all times of the day. The question of the liberty of the subject, 7" of course, came up, but the court de- cided that If an Englishman's house is his castle, 1t is not q fit place for bar rel organ that never stops, and the organ received strict inetruc li,. to remain silent, on the ground that the owner evil dently intended to create D Dlisanee
 The market value of cough was the question submitted to the Birmingham county court. A barrister sued rail- way company for $50 for discomfort suffered by smoking being allowed ill a waiting room at a station and in non smoking carriages. The smoking aggra. vated the barristsr's cough, and he was awarded G10.
 A queer point arose in the revision court at Nottingham. While the court was sitting young collier named All cock killed his wife ill the most deiib- crate manner and afterward confessed his crime. An application was made that Alleock's name should be struck off the register. 'Why?n queried the barrister, receiving the answer, Be cause he is murderer. "That re, mains to be proved, said the barrister and the name remained on the roll.
 The finding of lost property has often given rise to curious points of law. 4 workman who found valuable ring in 8 London theater claimed the return of the ring from the proprietors, who had taken possession of it. The court, how. ever, rejected his claim, as the ring had been picked up while the man was full filling his duties as servant. At first sight this decision appears to be incon- sistent with that arrived at some years ago in case ill which chimney sweep sued jeweler for precious stone. The sweep had found a brooch oil his rounds. which he took to the jeweler who ex- tracted precious stone and substituted a worthless imitation. Or. this being discovered, the jeweler replied to the sweeps demand for the return of his stone that the stone did not belong to the sweep, as he had found it, the infer ence being that he could, therefore, steal it with impunity. The court, how ever, held otherwise, and the sweep rs- covered his jewel.
 Eastern superstitition gave rise to singular argument i'll Chinese court not long ago. A Chinaman had been sent to prison, and, according to GUS tom, the authorities proceeded tocut of his pigtail, whereupon tho prisoner ap- piled for all injunction on the ground