Eagle River review. [volume] (Eagle River, Wis.) 1890-1927, 1897-05-13
BLOW TO MONROEIsM.
RETAINS RECOGNITION OF The
DOCTRINE MAY END.
Salisbury Now Has an Easy way o"'
Senators spurn Overtures OF Aroi'fa
tion-opposition Accuse England %
ux;n.s sinister Designs on America
Don't Want Peace.

Eno,and's supposed recognition or the
Monroe doctrine falls with the failure OF
the arbitration treaty. Having lost tnis
chance TO fix Monroeism as an lntefna-
t;onal principle. the United States may
some day be compelled to fight for 1t OF
abandon it. The compact, says WASH
ineton correspondent, was the outgroWtn
of the stand taken by the United States
&c To Venezuela. and. as the bargain was
not fulfilled, England is not committed "
the theory of American rule IN America
After changing, distigurlng ana lnVali !,
dating the arbitration treaty until out Oh
all semblance to the pact as it came from
the hands of Olney and Pauncefote' Tue
Senate kicked it's own hybrid out OF doors.
BY a vote of 43 to 26 the treaty was lost.
The rules of the Senate require majority
of two-thirds for the ratification OF trea-
ties. Hence four more affirmative votes
would have been required to secure
favorable result The vote in detail was:
Yeas-Allison, Bacon, Burrows, CAT
frey. Clay, Cullom, Davis, Deboe, Far
banks, Faulkner, Foraker, Frye, Calm
ger, Gear, Gray, Hale, Hanna, HaWiey,
Hoar Lindsay, Lodge, Mcbride, McEn-
cry, Mcmillan, Mitchell, Morrill,, Nelson,
Pascoe, Perkins, Plat of Connecticut
Platt of New York, Pritchard, Proctor,
Smith, Spooner, Thurston, Turpie, Vest,
Walthall, Warren, Wellington, Wetmore,
Wilson'S
Nays-Baker, Bate, Butler, Car
ter, Cockrell, Daniel, Hansbrough, Har-
ris of Kansas, Harris of Tennessee, Heit-
field, Jones of Arkansas, Jones of Ne
vada, Kyle, Martin, Mason, Mills, Nor
gan, Penrose, Pettigrew, Pettus, Quay,
Rawlins, Roach, Shoup, Stewart, White
90
The total vote cast was sixty mine, leav-
ing nineteen Senators who did not re-
spond.
The pairs were as follows, two affirma-
tive Senators being paired with one mega
tive Senator in most instances:
Chandler and Clark for, with Teller
against.
Tillman and Turner for, with Chiffon
against
Sewell and Earle for, with Mantle
against.
Senator George was paired for the
treaty and Senator Berry against it.
Pairs not announced for, were the fol-
lowing: Aldrich, Cannon, Elkins, Cor
man, Murphy, Wolcott, Kenney and Al
len.
The vote was preceded by a short, spir
tied debate, introduced by Mills, who
made a. strong appeal to the Senate
against Tatifying the agreement. He as
serted that as amended the document was
most Objectionable, not to say contradic-
tory in it's terms. He pointed out espe-
cially the provisions for the settlement
of the controversies in regard to terrific
rial claims and asserted that whereas the
amendments adopted by the Senate to the
first article Of the treaty declared against
their inclusion, those to the sixth and
eighth articles made provision for them
He held that as long as these articles re-
manned unchanged England justly would
claim that it's questions of territorial
rights were still included within the scope
of the treaty. Under such circumstances.
he asked, what was to prevent England
from purchasing the island of Cuba or any
other American territory, and in case Of
objection on the part of the United States
insisting upon reference of the dispute to
arbitration. He spoke of the conduct Of
England in connection with the Greco
Tuskish war and implored the Senate to
protect the United States against the pro-
missed alliance