Arizona republican., 1897-12-18

rush and forced Mccoy to the ropes withoul damage. Mccoy came back on the face and three rights on the ribs without a return. A hard left Sn the wind made Creedon grunt. Then the New Zesllarder rushed and jabbed a right on the head The Kid swung 8 heavy lef: on the head which turned Dan's craniur around. Afer light sLarring Creedon put a left on the head and McCcy clinched as the bell rang.
 Round H. Mccoy jabbed a beautl- lead for the stomach. They ex- changed left bands on the face twice aui McCcy landed a heavy left on the nose. which sent Dams head back and started his eye 70 bleeding.
 Round 15.-McCoy kept jabbing his left on the stomach, occasionally varying his tactics with jabs in the face. His advantage of reach was too great for Dan. Mccoy in 9he rush uppercut with his left on the fs and hooked his right on the 5aw, floor ing Creedon in hls own corner. Dan took the full Emit to get up and then clinched Creedon was very weak when he went to his corner and was u-r.ble to respond when the gong rang for the beginning of the sx- teenth. Choynski seeing that his man was beaten, threw up the sponge ANOTHER TURN OF THE WHEEL. A Further Hcar. ng of the Rece.vership
 Matter.
 Another incident of the Arizona Canal and Improvement company re- ceivership matter has been presented On Thursday night after the appoint ment of c. J. Hall to be receiver, c. F. Ainsworth on receipt of a telegram from the bondholders filed motion to dismiss the suits brought by the Mer- chants Loan and Trust company.
 This motion will be heard today, which is motion day. In order to be prepared for a favorable hearing of this motion which might include a dis solution of the receivership ard a turning over of the property to the sbondholders, Armstrong & Hamilton, for the Glendale shareholders, made application for an order restraining the canal company from transferring it's property pd kainlg the disposition of the suit brought by the shareholders. What the court will do with the motion t5Adismiss land how a dis missal will affect the receivership are ! bath sn1bjects of conjecture. There is an Impression that Judge Street will ! deny the motion, but if he should nol-, there is an expression in his late or der which indicates that the receiver ship will in any event remain undis- ] turbed. For, said he in the order: 'The court is of opiniom that, al though the scope of the petition in No 29S4 is so great that it may include 1 all that is asked in petition No. 29S2 l yet the interests of tEe petitioners in | No. 29S2 is so closely corrected win | the property by reason of the water rights held by the compla nanlts, and | that their large possessions were SC dependent upon the management oi | the Arizona canal that if the Mer- chants Loan and Trust company trustee, had not filed a petition for the appointment of a receiver, the cOur would be justified in appointing re ceiver under the petition of the Glen dale Fruit company e- all"
 The bondholders will probably op pose the operation of a receyershil to the extent of taking an appeal 1T the event of any decision that does no dissolve it.
 The matter of applying for a dis missal of both suits brought by tn Merchants Loan and Trust compan, and of procuring the dismissal of tht Glendale suit was considered s.m time ago. As long as two weeks agt telegram was received from th president of the Glendale Fiui
 company at Chicago sayin: that company had been jcinat in the petition without any official au
 thority other than that of the secre tary, Thcmas Whitfield, who happenea to be here at the time the litigation began. But even If the Glendale FLlli company had been withdrawn it wouI probably not have weakened the pc
 tition, since it was only one of {
 multitude of plaintiffs. However, r
 further protest was made against tn
 course MT. Whitfield had taken an
 outsiders have often wondered why
 It has lately been asserted that tn