New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1897-12-29
BETWEEN MAN AND MAN,
Court Will Convene Next Week to Adjust
Legal Disputes.

Court Will Convene Next Week to Adjust
Legal Disputes.
Judge Webber will hold court for
Brown county in this city next week.
Thus far there are two criminal cases
on the calandar, both continued from
previous terms. One is against Roswell
y. Rice, charged with stealing wheat.
The other is against Hornschlager,
charged with driving over the jacobson
boy at Sleepy Eye.
Whether or not the arson cases against
Irving, Corey and the DAVIS boys will
be tried depends altogether upon the ac-
ton of the grand jury. "
The civil calendar contains nothing of
especial interest.
There are six cases carried over from
the last term. Three of these are ap-
peals from the awards of the commits
sioners in the matter of the right.of-way
of the Minneapolis, New Ulm & South
western Railway. They are brought by
Edward Stoeckert, John Stoeckert and
John Stoeckert & Sons, all of whom
will be represented by somerville & Oh
sen. Then there are two cases brought
by VIM. Pfaender against Cbas. and Ed.
Stoeckert to determine title to certain
real estate. Attorney Eckstein will ap-
pear for Pfaender and Somerville s. Oh
sen for the Stoeckerts. The other case
Is that of John P. Bertrand as executor
of the Pankratz estate against Robert
Schanberg. Somerville & Olsen for plain
tiff and L. G. Davis for defendant.
The balance of the calendar is as fol.
lows:
Fred Pfuender VS.. Board of County
Commissioners, an appeal from action of
the board relative to a certain bill. Eek
stein for plaintiff and Steinhauser for de-
fendant.
Lars P. Larson VS.. Winona s. st. Peter
Railroad Co. S. L. Pierce for plaintiff
and Brown s. Abbott for defendant.
Thos. Foster VS.. Edward Grimes.
Somerville & Olson for plaintiff. John
Lind for defendant. ......
Griffith s. Smith VS.. E. B. Schoonmak-
er-an appeal from justice court. Som
erville & Olsen for plaintiff. Davis fer
defendant.
Andreas Seifert vs.. Board of County
Commissioners s-an appeal from decision
of board in laying out road. Eckstein
for plaintiff. Steinhauser for the Com
missioners.
Werner Boesch VS.. Carl Engel-a case
arising over attachment proceedings.
Eckstein for plaintiff. Somerville s. Oh
sen for defendants. :
+ Hans Mo vs.. Wolfgang Schmid as ad-
rAinistrator of estate of Herman Feuer-
stein-appeal from order of probate
court disallowing claim. -.:
Seymour Van Santvoord, as Receiver
of the Walter Woods Harvester Works,
vs.. F. H. Retzlatf. Huebner for plain
tiff. Lind for defendant. 4e
A. A. Schlumpberger vs.. Ben. and Jos.
Reinhart. steinhauser for plaintiff. Lind
for defendants. --. - u
Chicago Cottage Organ Co. vs.. Geo.
Dayton. Somerville for plaintiff. Lind
for defendant. ~
Willis Cunningham vs.. Geo. Tauer.
Somerville for plaintiff. Davis for de-
fendant.
Nichols & Shepard Co. VS.. John and
Edward Egan.
Boock Bros. vs.. Christ Filzen. Haq-
berg for plaintiff. Eckstein for defend
ant.
Elvina Benham vs.. Mary 1ngraham
and others. Lind for plaintiff. Davis
for defendant.
Benz. Langworthy as Receiver of the
Mutual Fire Insurance Co. Of Chicago
VS.. VIM. and Carolina Winkelmann.
-Eckstein for plaintiff. Hagberg for de-
fendant.
Anton Adam and others Y. Henry Fort
wengler appeal from taxation Of costs.
Eckefo;n fr,r Y,lo;n<;H poa.an o,d r.
berg for defendant.
Griffith s Smith vs.. VIM, a. FeDscke.
someryille s Olsen for plaintiff. Stein
hauser for defendant.
John J. Kruger vs.. VIM. strassburg.
Davis for plaintiff. somervllle fer de-
fendant.
An old Georgia negro, hearing that
his former master had decided to enlist
in the Cuban army, said 70 him