The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-05-28

az Lake throu yh n telerraphlc warrant and
assessed n ouc against hin and ordered
him to Jail until the One and costs were
paid.
rus Juusment was vow Lake was NOV
ccediny. Edwards having been arrested by
ana oeing IN the custody OF 'he sherin OF
Mci-cnnan county when TINS proceoaing
w wr,. 49,. .u'.u .' NV nu s,au ra ss
because the writ was mo-, issued in tho
second habcas corpus proceeding. Having
no Jurisdiction over either the subject mat
ter or tho person OF the relator. Judge
SunaN acted without authority and his
order is without effect
opinion by Hurt 4. j.
-
w l., BURRlS. J. w. BhALoNN, w u
THOMPSON and J. Z, UAkliNHTpN,
habeas corpus proceedings appealed from
Kaufman county Reversed and realtors
discharged.
Relntors wcrr remnndcd 10 custody ON a
,, =, ..,. ,, a., 49,,
'""'se VI 'o'sp"aoS W s"'h"'o WV "'"-
son llopc''s Improvement r""V'N'
For the insunlciency of this evidence. the
judgmen, is reversed
opinion by i'aNiusoh' j.
. ~. Mc"hh.' from Mei.enhah oouhs
CONVECTION 'or VIOLATING the loe"' op'ion
laW'-N Affirmed
No error to the prejudice of appellant
was committed on the trial
o,,t,4,,, IA, n.,.t3so, I
V'''''S' ~
- cor,,,,,,,n ,a', ,.iat;n, -, ~ ,c,aI cn
ian i.,, -, fnrr,,,I
"a
"
week oil court uu'lhH winch 'u's "l'' 'ooN
pace Mas auashed on motion oil appei'au'
because snc luiV's "Su ovcu eu'''''onua "
s,ntutnrv .nth I.hrr,nnon thn ah.rtff was
duly sworn and he then summoned now
array of Jurors This array contained some
Of the Jurors who had CONFESSED the panel
previously quashod The array was uhAl-
ionged ON this around
The court did not err in refusing tho
challenge The proper grounds Tor chal-
lenee to an array summoned by a sheriff
are prescribed by statute. tArt. 6Gi and
1853. C.. C RI
have formed an opinion as TO appellant S
guilt or iunoccnce in another and u stinct
case was no ground OF challenge IA TINS
case.
g. Appelian, '"nten,i9" on me tria, was
IN" pru,,n S cinI, and thai rho hrrr was
,h,s cI,, oiIv ,n,Ier ,h,a s,a ", r.ss
,hs cc,,r, Al NO, er,' in aj'nif,tng evidrn,.o
OF the amount OF beer shipped and the
number OF members in the club
opinion by Davidson. j.
In. - ARNorD fro,,, prov,n copnt,,. CON-
victlon for violation of the local option
| law'-Aftirmed.
l. The state introduced without oblcc-
| tion secondary evidence of the fact that
! tc,o,1,u, bod roceived , Irn,t.d stat,s
/
U1'"IHh4 revenue lleehsc' "u'h"IM'hH nun
| TO pursue the OCCUPATION of a retail nlnor
dealer. ono of the stato's counsel stated
in the presence Of the mrv thar defendant
| had been served with notice 10 produce the
license and offered To Introduce suhd mo-
ground that these remarks constltutod a
comment ON his failure 10 testify In the
case.
Ihere is nothing ~ this oo'eetIon'
'p'"'oH ~ -" '"oo..' -
MoLLIE WHITNEY. from Bexar county;
conviction OF theft from the person. Al
l'''h'"'
mere rs no pll OF eAce"'ionS III '"e rec
ORD ana Tue evidence J" sui"eie"''
Opinion by Davidson. j.
~. CROSS. from Fails county; couVictlOn
/ i9r carrying a DIES Ol.- Afhlmod.
l. on n former dav the judgment In this
,,,,,.,,.a, nh. ,.,o,,,..1 ~. th,.,. ,,r,.
eeh'ed 'lu nor ano" 'ho ''uu' vi '"' 'Vu'
authorizing the statement OF taclb TO be
| flied within ten DAYS after adjournment
cor ,ho ,.r,, aud -. tboref,rr refused In
w., 1',' 'V, ~ . ",'r ~ ,,' a., ,,,o,in,,
90 , ", ,,,,,, "a,
| 10, ,en' ~ l"b III, w. , ,h' tn,,,.s
, 1to" - w ' " w ,..t, ", ,n
ne H. W" 10 ~ a,',,, IN .,,,
th"l app1iian, wa t".o,el ut ~" IN, az
81 we "ileton oiiehs,' So we son.s NV
n't err III i1i i '"e "ooe'"' '""' ~
oninion Inv Davidsop +
JOHN +. MONTGOMERY. from Bdsque