The Morris County chronicle. [volume] (Morristown, N.J.) 1877-1915, 1897-10-15
FILL COURT OPENED.
Continued from First Page.

Continued from First Page.
brewed liquors in quantities less than the
quantities for which his license is obtained.
2. Any person who having only retail IL
cense to sell in quantities less than one quart
sells these liquors in quantities from one quart
to five gallons.
s. Any person who without license for
that purpose sells such liquors in quantities
from one quart to five gallons.
T. Any person having license to sell
liquors in quantities from one quart to five
gallons. who suffers any liquors sold by his
license, to be drunk on or about the premises
sold.
s. Any person who. whether licensed or not,
sells any intoxicating liquors on Sunday.
g. Any person who, whether licensed or
not, sells such liquors in any place in which is
conducted any grocery store or mercantile
business, except in the keeping of a restaurant.
or any other place than that named in his
license.
z. Any druggist or pharmacist regularly
employed may sell any liquor in less
measure than one quart without license.
provided such liquors are sold in good
faith for medicinal purposes only, and
on prescription of a reputable ply
stefan and signed by him, the liquor sold. not
TO be used or drunk about tho premises where
sold. Any druggist selling or allowing the
sale contrary to these provisions is liable to
indictment.
Any tavern keeper or saloon keeper or
dealer in liquor, who for three times within six
months shall sell or give any such liquors to
any boy or girl within the age of eighteen
years. is also liable to Indictment.
These, gentlemen, are the laws of this
state, the policy of the Legislature not
having been changed from the earliest
period of our history, SO far as | am
aware. If the policy is wrong the peopiO
can right it and make it what it ought to
be, but while it is the policy of this state,
forcible by the administration of the
criminal laws. gentlemen, you would
not do your duty if on due evidence of
the commission of any of these crimes
| you fail to indict those persons. If in
considering any of these cases there is
any question upon which you desire in
struction from the court. the court will
at all times be willing to give such in
struction upon hearing your desire, either
expressed by your foreman or by con-
i stable
John Babbitt and John Chapman were
selected as constables in charge of the
Grand Jury.
The following is a list of the causes
thus far noticed for trial in the Supreme
and Circuit Courts which convened at
the Court House in Morristown on Tues
day last:
SUPREME COURT.
John w. Fancher VS.. Thomas o. Bullock; on
John W. Fancher VS. Thomas o. Bullock; on
contract.
Patrick Kennedy VS.. D L. & w. R. R. Co.;
John w. Fanch vs.. D., L. & W. R. R. Co.;
in tort.
William E. Nolan VS.. David Shannon; on
Elizabeth Carpenter VS. John N. ConkIing,
ct ais in ejectment.
Thomas o. Bullock vs. Albert DATE; in tort
Thomas 0. Bullock VS.. D.. L. & w. R. r. Co.;
| in tort.
Almira Dabbs vs. Charles P. Cook. ct ais; in
tort.
Holmes; on contract.
Francis P. Martin, who sues. etc.. VS.. Robert
B. Holiness on contract.
/ Andrew j. Slingerland VS.. Thomas A. Giles
pie. ct ais; in tort.
Andrew J. slingerland vs.. East Jersey Water
| Co.: in tort.
Aletha B. slingerland vs.. East Jersey Water
Kate Camisa VS.. Morris County Electric Co.:
in tort
Madaline Camisa VS.. Morris County Electric
CIRCUIT COURT.
New York & New Jersey Telephone Co.
| appellants, vs.. Sarah Lord HOwells, ct ais,
appelleess appear IFOu aWd.u Ol cOHInlselOntIe
struck jury.
Francis j. Blanchard VS.. Morristown Gas
Light Co.; In tort.
Rose j. Headley VS.. Joseph Hinchman,
admir-, ETC.; on contract.
Harry r. H Nicholas VS.. Ira Sanderson, et
ais; on contract.
William H. Baker. ct ais, VS.. D., L. & w
R. r. Co; in tort.
William H. Baker vs.. Morris County Rail
road Co.; in tort
Park Union Lumber Co. VS.. Sidney T. Smith
on contract.
William Jordan VS. Edward W. Howell,
builder. and John Walters, owner, ct ais; or
lien claim.
Edward W. Howell vs.. John Walters; or
contract
Stephen Henry by VIM. Gallagher, his next
friend, vs.. Edward W. Howell, builder, and
John Walters, owner, ct ais; on lien claim.
William Jordan vs. Edward w. Howell,
builder, and John Walters, owner. ct ais: on
lien claim.
Stephen Henry bv VIM. Gallagher, his next
friend, VS.. Edward w. Howell, builder and
John Walters, owner. ct ais; on lien claim.
Diana Walters vs.. John Walters; on contract.
The Castle Rock Park VS.. Central r. r. of
N. j.; in tort.
Joseph II. Brooks VS.. Edmund A. Backer; in
tort.
Joseph R Williams VS. Edward W. Howell,
builder. and Philip H. Best, owner. ct ais; on
! lien contract