The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-11-14

VI
Fort Worth, Texan. November lS--The
following business was transacted In the
court Of civil appeals today:
Motions for rehcarlng submitted Texts
and Pacific Railway company w. j, b. Me-
Waters. from CsliAhAns Tylor ct a vs..
stephens ct al, from ncsQ0e. Horchers w.
Meal, from Donlcy; Texas and Pacific
Railway company va Hall, from Taylor;
Thornton VS.. Foster. from Comanchc.
To dismiss appeal submit Uvxi---N Morgan ~,
Mcconnell from Haskell. 10 file transcript
and agreement. motion granted and record
ordered filed; Morris ct III W. Taylor 81
al, from Wise, jackson, city Judge, W.
swaync. county attorney, from Tafrant.
Motions to dismiss appeal ovcrvulcd--
Cutler va StaSe Of Texas, OK rel Rush,
from l.ipsooinb; Morgan VS.. Mcconnell
from Haskell, and leave granted appellant
to file bond Within twenty days.
Milton for rehearing granted and 1udg-
ment reversed and cause rcnhandcd--M Mock
Va. Hatcher from Tarrant.
Motion to advance Mfused--Baln w.
Simpson, from Motley.
Motion 10 Strike out transcript refused
Hedgecoxe ct al VS.. Connor ct al, from
Archer: Texas and Pacific Railway COM
pany VS.. j.. II, Mcwaitcrr, from Callahan.
motion for rehvaring stricken FROM the
docket.
Cases submitted Morgan Va. Mcconnell,
from Haskell; Mccormick Harvesting Ma
chino company ve. Timmons, from Wichita,
waggoncr Va wiec County. from Wish;
Earl va Slocum, from Tarrant; Planters
oil company va Manscl, from Parker,
Graham Mercantile company va. Kay. from
Young. Texs Brewing company VS.. Wal
tiers. from Tarrann
Passed to the heel OF the tiocket--rexas
Brewing company VS. ntHvm. from Tar
rant; Fort Worth comptess company vs..
| Chicago, Rock Island and ToAas Railway
company, from rarrant,
| Sci Tor December 1---Missouri, Kansas
and Texas Railway company OF Texas VS..
| Chambers, from Grayson Neil T., Ander-
son 4 Co. VS., Hardin, from Red River; Du-
| mas vs. Missouri Kansas and Texas Rail-
| WY company OF Texas, from Rockwali
| Wilcox 4 Son VS.. Walker, from Collin:
| Texarkana ana Fort Smith Railway nom-
| rany VS. Hartford Insurance company. from
| Howius Siatpes VS. Harris, from Lamar;
| Woodall ct al vs. Standard Sewing Machine
! company, from Kanfmani Lancaster ct nj
vs.. Dixon g, al from fannn. Texas and
| Pacific Railway company VS. Mccoy, from
| Harraor
Cases submHtod--State National bank Of
\ Fort Worth We, Thomas Manufacturing
| company, from Tarrnt; Wittier ~ Co, VS.
| Mcconnell et al, from Parker; Hcndcn ~
al VS.. Nucltles ct al, from Bnrleman Beard
Va Wheeler from WISE Missouri, Kansas
/ and Texas Railway company OF Texas W.
| Bridgemnn. from Tnrmnt,
| Reversed and remanded--,Johpson VS.
| Holland, from Carson
| Reversed and Observation-Disclosures vs.
| Connor. from Archer.
In Spicer ct al VS.. Henderson. from Jack
| Judgments IL affirmed as to the title to tn,
| land, but reversed and rcinnndcd upon is.
e,ic Of partition and improvements.
Tho following is adopted as Il rulo OF thlI
court:
Whereas. case that IL postponed b,
agreement. after u hae beon ret down fo
submission, shall take Its place tt the hee
Of the docket unless otherwise ordered 70
good cause shown. No postponefnent
however, will be granted as a matter o
course because or agreement. but onl,
when the business Of the court will adIni
OF IL.