The herald., 1897-05-28

that she would have to give internal
treatment" by saying that Or" Hast
ings remarked on Monday to Lillian that
he would not need to give internal
treatment" This apparent contradic-
ton witness explained by saying that
the latter remark of defendant was quail
flied by the words "for the present" !"
In answer to minutely defined ques-
tions witness stated that Lillian wac in
great pain on Monday, the first day
that witness saw her.
Reverting to the question as to what
went on when Lillian died, counsel asked:
when you went into the room who
was there?"
'I don't remember the lady's name
there and Mrs. Weaver came in just
as I did"
Wasn't the electric light man also
there?"
mo, sir; he went home"
Didn't he assist in removing the
body?"
Il thought he went home, but he
wasn't there"
When the cleansing of the body, as
you claim. took place, where was Lillian
Hattery
ION the cot in the gentleman's room
where che died"
Then although the doctors object,
if he had done it, was concealment he
did this in your presence; is that your
testimony"
"Well, I was there"
Witness in the lower court gave as a
supposition that the defendant washed
| the body of the deceased Lillian, but in
answer to the direct question yesterday
she said she knew he did" Nothing had
transpired meantime to enlarge her
knowledge of the matter and of course
witness was involved in contradiction.
And 20 on through Miss Horizons tess
timony counsel sought to entrap her by
skilfully devised questions regarding the
happenings during the first five days of
February, and after having minimized
her testimony as far as he could she was
released from the witness stand AT
about 8 o'clock in the afternoon.
TESTIMONY OF THE DETECTIVES
The prosecution wanted to put for
ward as their next witness Mrs. DR..
Dora King, but unfortunately the lady
could not be found. Mrs. Aldrch, the
lady from whom Mrs. King rented
rooms Con Mallory, the detective of the
district attorneys office, and Detectives
Bradsh and Fowler testified to having
made search for her unavailingly, and
all diligence having been used, the dis
trict attorney desired that the court per-
nit the testimony given by Mrs. King
at the preliminary examination to be
read. Mr.. Gage protested and reeled off
trip pf nhiacfionc the
being that the law did not contemplate tie
any such procedure in a trial for mur-
der; that in such case the defendant
had the right to demand to be con-
fronted by all witnesses, go that they
could be ross-examined. But the tes-
timony went in all the same, but as Mr..
Gage kept firing away objections all the
time, it was in very mutilated condi-
ton, for many of the objections were
sustained and parts of the testimony or
dered stricken out. Epitomized, the tes.'
timony of Mrs. DR.. King was that Lii
! ian Hattery had called upon her and
wanted her to perform the operation she
desired, but that she refused.
After reading this transcript of evil
dence the prosecution put forward De-
tective Bradish. He stated that he began
to work on the case on the evening OF
February 5th. He saw the body of
Lillian Hattery lying at the morgue. and
Mr.. Hattery. Detective Auble and the
morgue attendants were present. About
$50 Auble and Mr.. Hattery accompa :
MED him to DR.. Hastings place on
Spring street. The doctor was not in,
but returned in a short time. Witness
asked him when Lillian came to his place