The Wichita daily eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1890-1906, 1897-10-13

eSe-One Dismissed and Four Reversed
Case From KInsman County Against
Ex-sherin Burroughs is Compromised,
County Remitting Judgment and Pay
Ing Half the Costs-Lon. Argument as
to Whether GOO Acres are Worth 500.
The Southern department. OF the Kan
cas- court Of appeals opened session o.
October term in this city yesterday
morning, Presiding Judge Dennison, As
sociatea Milton and Schoonover present.
Clerk w. A. Ayers was in Topeka at
the grand lodge OF Odd Fellows, having
gone there on a special mission to Sc
cure the location Of Odd Fellows Orphan
home for Kansas at Wichita, and W.
W. Ayers, assistant clerk, had charge Of
the work
Among the attorneys from out Of town
were George L. Hay and William Wal
lace OF Kingman, L. B. Kellogg Of En-
poria, Thomas L. Davis, J. B. Clogston
and c. E. Fuller Of Eureka and ]. c.
Ellis OF Pratt.
Most of the day was taken up by mo-
lions to dismiss. There We're five cases
in which the Santa Fe railroad was
plaintiff in error, these being suits for
damages from injury and fire with qdes+
ton or amount OF damages al issue.
Case Of Santa Fe company against W.
II. Werner was dismissed, and against
r. n. Brasher, o. S. Northrop, J. w
Carpenter and c. P. Sites were render
ca and remauded to courts below.
Case Of c. Q. Bullock, county suparin-
:tandent Of Kngman county. against B.
c. Burroughs, ex-sheriff OF Kingman
county, was compromised, county COM
Inissioners OF Kingman county agreeing
70 pay half tlre-costs and remit the judg-
ment against Bullock. Tt appears that
Bullock while principal of the schools at
Eilinwood had property interests in
Kingman county upon which ne had
some mortgages. There was some dis
agreement as ID terms OF payment on
two hundred and fifty dollars of the
mortgage. Judgment was secured in the
district court and executed by Sheriff
Rarrougns, who took good deal Of
stock and other property to satisfy the
judgment Bullock sued Burroughs with
the result stated George L. Hay of
Kingman was attorney for Bullock.
Disposition Of cases for the day was
as follows:
No. 1sO-E. "A. NIinich. receiver. vs.
the Johnson Loan and Trust company;
dismissed.
No. 221-City OF Wellington vs.. Will
lam Chamberlain; dismissed.
No. 222-C. Q. Bullock vs.. B. C. Bur-
roughs, sheriff, etc; dismissed.
No. 22S-Addie P Barnes va. Henry
Bradley. administrator; submitted.
No. 224-The Peoples Fire Insurance
company Of Manchester vs.. Francis Rit-
tsnhouse dismissed.
No. 225-W. J. Jones We. J. W. Nov;
dismissed.
No. 226-T J. Lacy VS.. F. H. Mann ct
al: submitted.
No. 460T-Commerctal Bank Of Lehigh
vs. William Reddig; dismissed.
No. 215-Feasant Grove Township VS.
A. r. Weir; motion to reinstate allowed
Nc 2o3-E O. Wistrand VS.. W. C.
Parker; dismissed
No. 265-Harrtett Bohana vs.. yelling
ton National bank; continu~l 10 jan
uary term.
NO. 5Sl-T10n3S Il. Sparks W CARA
SparkS:Slbmftted on motion 10 dismiss.
No. H3-J. G. Johson vs.. Wilhelm
KohuctZ: dismissed.
No. 437-Litier Dixon vs. Barnard
Lease company; dimissed.
No. 5o3-Atchison. Topeka ana Santa
Fe Railway company VS.. W. H. Weber;
dismissed.
No 944-Atchsor, Topeka and Santa
Fe Railway company VS. R. H. Brasher;
reversed.
No. 205-Atchison. Topeka and Santa
Fe Railway company VS.. o. S. Northrop;
reversed
No 43S-Atchison. Topeka and Santa
Fe Railway company VS. ]. ". Carpen-
ter; reversed.
No. 504-Atchison, Topeka and Santa
Fe Railway company vs. c. P. Sites; re-
veTsed.
No. 5lo-S. H. Standhart. assignee. vs..
Nancy II. Chance; dimissed at cost Of
plaintiff in error.
No. 7S2-sarah W. Goodale vs.. ". H.
Morris; dimiSSed.