Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1897-02-27

VoU ARE HEREBY REQUIRED 10 APP.
Il pear IN an action brought against you
rs the above named plAintu IN the District
Court OF the Third judicial District OF the
statc OF Utah, aud u answer the complaint
Mod therein within ten days exclusive OF the
DAY OF servicol after the service on you OF
this suinmons-if sorved within this county,
or. II served out of this county, but IN this dis.
trict. within twenty days; Otherwise within
iorty dHys-or judgment by default Will be
thksn against YOU, according TO the prayer OF
said complaint.
The said action Is brought TO have judgment
against tho defendant for tho sum OF s21s,lt
principal aud interest thereon on at the rato
OF per cent per annum from aud since june
20 lhyd, lees 81 paid august u, lhpj, paid
August -. ISIS. $500 paid August 81 1880, -
paid September 7. ls9i, and SO 30 paid october
Z. 1875. Tor s3J attorneys fees and costa Of
SUIT; alleged to he due he plaintiffs from tho
defendant, Hugh a Arnold, upon u certain
psonlssory noe, executed ny the SAID
defendant, Arnold, 10 the plaintiffs,
for the sum of y21Sll, due IN one
year after date, with interest at
per cent per nnnumi the same being due
and wholly unpaid, save and except the sums
ns above set forth, being secured by mort
gage Of even date thorewiin on the promises
hefeinaftor described. executed 10y the dc.
PENDANT. Hugh a. Arnold, and his wife susan
Arnold. to the plaintiffs, that these plaintiffs
are the lawful owners and holders Of SAID note
and mortgage; that by the terms of said mort.
gage the ABOVE named defendant. Hugh A.
Arnold, agreed to pay reasonable httorney'B
ice, 10 nave the usual decree OF ms court Tor
the foreclosure OF sRid mortgage and the sale
of SAID promises, adiudging the proceeds Of
said sale may be applied 10 the payment OF the
amount found due 10 those plaintiiln, after the
payment OF the co3B NJ the Court, and OK.
prnses Of the sale. that defendant ana all
persons claiming under them, be barred and
iorecoscf of all clatu or equity OF redemption
IN SAID premises. and every part thereof that
plaintiffs have judgment and execution against
The SAID defendant Hugh a. Arnold for any
deficiency which may remain after applying
nll he procOeda OF the sale Of said
premises properly applicable TO the
satisfaction OF said judgment That
the plaintiff or any party to this suit uAy 10.
come Il purchaser Ut said sale that the sheriff
execute a deed to the purchaser. that the pur.
chaser be lctintO posscssiOn NJ sand premises
on production of the sEeriH's deed therefor:
and that the piAintiil- have such other and
further relief in the premises us to this court
may seem juat and equitable
SAID premises are described az follows; Lots
hfty-Oue (5i), hfty.two 1872 IN Block three 10
an Central furk aubdlvision OF Lots /, 2 and 3
and % IN Block IL, Ten Acre HAT a. Big
Field SURVEY. Same boi0g situate in SAT- Lake
CITY and county. utsu.
And you are hereby notified that II you fail
to appear and answer the said complaint
as above required the said plaintiff Will apply
to the Court for The relief demanded therein.
WItness tho Honorable Judges. ami the seal
OF the District Court Of the Third Ju.
dictal District. In and Tor the Stale OF
lsEALl Utah this 2gud day of January. in
the year Of our LORD one thousand
eight hundred and ninety seven.
DANIDiN DUNBAR. Clerk,
by GRO. ID. LoDMGs. Deputy Clerk.