The Norfolk Virginian. [volume] (Norfolk, Va.) 186?-189?, 1897-06-13

u
courageous" SEsSsssT TSsSs;
Considering the vast interests ISosiss sS3
S!afa has in rice and sugar =, con 1lSEa{
lr McEnely, Considering the 1it tfsiiSs tffssiis
or her saw mills, her salt and sui blur
mines IS there any reason why'd ftfa
De1nocratic party Of my State shotitSl
not pc committed to protect ion 2SsSSS SNS5fss
high protection, but such protect fofigTM
IS consistent with revenue nscessf siesss
rms also believe Is the doctrine ofS Sfaai8
republican party. do not belisVed dhaE
either party Is desi1ous OF imposing stifsi
necessary burdens upon the peop .sssssss
+ MI M1cEnery at some lene,t d I: $refsAI IfHs5|
his political career to show that AZ fssTs
pack as 1SS4-h occupied the saIna2 rfesffe4s effes
lion OH this question occupied n BY ShsfsS
now. Gall it what you will, Said sRssss
protection. revenue duty with sincidsM
tai protection Or anything else
amounts must be raised, and there skas safiisYS
reason why the industries Of the sniifsY
should not be protected. III He saf.I I5sIiff
mao right as q Democrat to haysSt ia
platform OF 1892 carried out, butt %itfYySSsA
not. There was no doubt Of the Sc6iisfaa
tutional right to levy duties forf ssSS Si9
tection He stood with j frersoir y vafrsSfYl rSf
Jackson on the tariff.
lie then proceeded to read q caref fulSa
prepared argument in favor or i the nSe aa'ss es
lection OF home industries. The ReilisisSS
Leans appeared to be highly graf assE
Inc Louisiana Senator's 8 outspokeiiS III aSa az
lection sentiment NJ r.
charged inconsistency to fhose emo
Gratis who sought protection II for Stfii issS;sas
local interests, but who opposed pr6 tguS
tlon as q system for the VIII ole coIir tfssVs
lie did not desire to impeachCth & faiSH
or integrity Of the Democratic 4 paFfvs
lie sought to demonstrate, he said. iiaES
proposition that tariff views did not caSiSa
stttute the test Of Democrajnvs FFssssiy4S sa 4SI
!, n 20 a
sures Of benefit to the Int Is az siaIss'
State so long as those interests G1fSl siiH siiioHhI
conflict with the interests OF otheFSl61ssss
calit!es Mr.. McEnery spoke for i1earlS1
two hours sS sa I
The vote upon Mr.. Jones amen dmsntI i5sa,5s
20: nays. 80 tsS5ssFsI ss5
MI. Lindsay. Of Kentucky tllef1Sf fooH}
the floor in support OF his amendln anT5
TO strike out the differentiaI on Trafff ff,aAs
sugar and place all sugars on an ed sisl lffssff ffsf
~ While he realized that It was hoiisst
less to try to reduce the duty on sGgaiyl
Mr.. Lindsay said he was not wi nslsSsff Ssf
hope that the Senate would with q IA flif
this proposed protection to the trIlsAl
which dominated the market, and d f.ee 4
tempted to control the politics of s4ffJIfssss Jss
country. The trust did not need aI.ssse
should not have assistance This aWSs
ceeded Gee acc w would. he said. tax the peoDaa
Mr.. Lindsay argued that the trust nafss
concealed advantages in every schediIIds
which Its oppon ents could not point sulafN
Every doubt, he declared, should he
solved against the trust e. e read StfisSsSAs NJ
testimony Of President Hayeme eyafF s1YYs
which he stated that the TRUST seoYi
ed the price OF sugar. ''Inat is&fhAK KiIiH
Of candor." said Mr.. Lin dsay, Wtaan 3f31SaI
concluded the reading ~ iichS ss0f 0frIsBs
nsands a certain kind Of adrniiaf toaSH
outrageous as may be the aHd
avowals OF him who makes ti1eIn
'Is we mean business Int nterposed AfnH
Allen, of Nebraska, .t'arld we desar sfeSS
destroy this sugar trust, why ton e&sysss
go into court and by quo Warrantps
other corporation process dissolVa Rasx sx
trusts2" .a at # }if:.S 81 $Sa
II hope" replied Mr.. Lind say. sbefoTs1sfSas;
this bill is, passed to sea an amendYiaas2s5
engTafted upon 1t which will enable ttX$
courts to protect the people from Il TIC
ayarice Of this corporatio on. But bts
cause, the courts have failed to; ;dos thstH
duty It Is not for the legislative dep
ment to give an additional subssdySE
the trust" 53 lS3 5s$ 24z
Mr. Morgan gave notice OF an arisHE S
ment he should offer designed to &I,fa
vent future sales'' OF stocks on sE1fifNSles8
Then at 4:30 D. M, without voting Hsa
the Lindsay amendment, /, the Senate als&ss
journed. saSS