The Wilmington daily Republican. (Wilmington, Del.) 1890-1902, 1897-07-15

these footprints from beginning to end,
We can commence here, for this seems
to have been the point Of departure for
two people. See." Burrows pointed to
The ground before them. Mr.. Barnes
stepped down from the piazza, being
careful not to destroy any Of the i'm
pressions already in the snow. He ex-
amined the footprints closely a minute
and then said GAS you say, here are
two tracks. Which would you trace
frst?'
1.-THE smaller" answered Burrows,
after little consideration.
"Why?"
MAINLY because it leads to the sum-
mer house, which is what we intended
to examine when we started out. Then,
again, I noticed that these two sets Of
footmarks are very different. One is SO
large it must be that Of a man, and
equally the other is SO tiny none but a
woman's foot could have made it."
"And you would follow the woman g
footsteps first, eh? What did you say
awhile ago about not considering sex!
But shall I tell you what you are think
ing?"'
Burrows looked up inquiringly, and
Mr.. Barnes proceeded impressively:
"Tom, you are making a great mis-
take. one which cannot too much warn
you to avoid now and all through
life. You have already formed your
: opinion Of this case. and unoonsciously
perhaps you are ready to fit to your
theory any evidence that turns up"
Burrows attempted to disclaim any
such intention, but Mr.. Barnes con-
tinued:
II don't blame you exactly. You
have youth and ambition as your ex-
cuse, and I am sorry to say I have
known older and more experienced men
drop into the same error. They are so
anxious to discover a criminal-a Grim
inal mark the words"
but, really, you are mistaken. You
misjudge me. p
II am afraid not. I don't wish to
stay your zeal either, but in cases like
this it is wisest to make haste slowly,
as the proverb has it. Now let me show
you what you have done in your own
mind. First, you find hole in pane
Of glass, and because you can weave
enough evidence to show that 1t is Of
recent origin You conclude that the ia.
tai shot passed in that way. The fact
is, all that evidence proves is that a
bullet passed through tho glass last
night. Anything further is merely
matter Of oircumstantial possibility, or
pehaps in this case might 60 SO far as
to say probability. Second, you find a
woman who is certainly acting suspi-
ciously. don't say you actually accuse
her, but you incline to such judg-
ment Third, these footprints. Having
in your theory settled that the shot
came from without and deeming it pos
sible that a certain woman committed
the crime, you would examine the wo.
mans footsteps first and if possible
prove tbssreby that the woman whom
you would implioate was in the position
to fire through the window. Thus you
would strengthen your theory"
Burrows seemed confused, as though
detected in a mean act. In truth, he
was to himself considering the chance
Of discovering the murderer by his own
individual efforts, thus, If possible. fore
sailing the man with whom he was
working He was therefore not little
astonished at the accuracy with which
his companion had read his thoughts.
II am afraid you hit the nail on the
head said he, "and / am ashamed to
be forced to confess 1t. But tell me,
which Of these trails do you decide Oh
tracing tirst?"
1.-THE same as you selected, but for
this reason: Notice that here the direc-
ton is toward the summer house, as
you just now said, while on this side
the point of the toe shows that the own
er Of the foot returned to her starting
point Unless we find another trail
leading from the house we have here
proof conclusive that this party has re-
NAMED within doors.'
How SO? I don't see that"
"Yet 1t is simple. Notice that the
steps away from the house are very in
distinct, while those coming toward us
are, on the contrary, clear and sharply
defined. The woman left this spot while