The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-07-15

| scaerste cornm sioHers at Fortress Monroe
| during the official Interview; and that a.
! least Mr stephens knew that union and
peace being conceded. MIR. Lincoln was
| wiling that he iStepheusi should I'LL u
! Pretty much whatever details he pleased
| Mr Lincoln feeling that Mir. stephens WAS
! q wise just statesman, Who could be trust
/ cd TO insert nothing unreasonable or i'll
! advised. Air. WatteTeon has said no more
! than this and its truth can not be succcsN-
I ;vlly rainsaid, for il is supported by con
/ elusive proof official and personal.
/ For Judge Reagan Mr.. WatterEon has al
ways entertained sentiments OF friend mess
| ami respect But In this matter the Judge
| is neither fair in denying that ishich has
/ never been charged. that is. tliat "terms
/ Wers offered the ssltb at Fortress Mon
! roe nor Just In ignoring such Etateinen'a
/ as thCse quoted In the foregoing, which
I were drawn out by his original publication
! TWO wars ago. Assuredly Nj NatteTson
/ rever said that Mr.. Lincoln offered 10 pay
| en- indemnity for the slaves, or TO treat on
! any basis short Of the restoration OF the
! Union. a, Fortress Monroe aud Mr.. Wat
| ierson s the only party 10 the contro'ersv
( whom Judge Reagan has questioned. Tor on
I that side no one else has appeared upon
| the scene wish the South refusing 10
treat except upon the recognition OF the
Independence OF the Ccnfcderaty and Mr..
Lincoln refusing to treat except on the
t.sis Of union, there coui' nov w. VI rs, ve
Waa' Mr. Ma''e'S.n q, ~, ,hs south
tanned bF Uhe iYtuIu S,..,..a-,o,,s ,er,ns
might have on'ainea an'a..,a Ious n he
OF ?. ace N!th'h ie,s IN" - -. t,,.a,,eo
toial c'aislSe ol tne VI. 80. ,,j,h
MI i.ilcui va e,soI i -, F,Eot,sbed
ne ,nioh r,s, 80 ooo ~ IN 81 ,,dgr,rits and
anu 70 pay SfVV 49,. ~. - ro,fcderato
that' II ms wa h','"n ,tr,, i, was
postmaster sthe'a -. &C. rt.b,nond
known oY uthe.s '"'"' "''1 go
ana IN Nash'hE'oH, .- ,.,,,,-s,,.- that bis
Mr.. terson rei ,1!.s. ~" III j1co,rl's
so4e purpose Voc 20 |,,.t,,. ~ char.
btead'u c F!eM IN eht..a-i,. s-e,.ors mr.
ttdlsV' h't % rus a'iy - so.,,r, ~
ssNes. WIN WITH .slN Ia has ncthjng tn
me VAT p' ss''4Sne ~ go. W ratnt Ahra-
90 re simply uilpetVs''A u" -" a,re,,, yas
nam Lincoln aS ne liz INC hat no mi
me ore iiLin J" l"sltN ~ -. 49,, ~, no
Na'e stieis VI ~ 49, - -. ~
sha'P ~ s'ilAi Coi,"'e-.9 o. WAL
ne gfta. Se'y'"l." , s IN. .'s5 ,h 80
9tWaFd; MAJ "au 1'i I'm, a.,5 H.
nam; 1t"1i S'n 49, 80 ,,sgaj in
HQhl 9e! N Vhel H1.i.i' u..shr.r,,- ~
manu- ~ manu- a" -, r.
i-.he-'h "aS P' ao..e.,'s i.a"
i''El'e, e.' ,,-t.D. :. - -
nv ~. - - ~ 80, Ia 10
vi .>@'H'+a' roint,n - -, a. 80 IN -.
mn W 'A'iiDs , GU i-,t-g ~ -,
"'nH ~. -. .,.s,,., 800
p'' mn nv ~, - III 30.
lS,s' as Pi'si''N' an s''ie anu @'' "'A'
- ,.,. tf,,--,t - co,.,.-, nan NJ
III -, -. s,,ta.,rors IL ~
- a. ar.oi,-, 10 ca,,,b az 10
e..,,i,..yi ~ Tb.re ms barJ,,. d.,
d,,rtns, ~ n,sr ~, ~ ,ras ~ nrotee+jry
- -. ,,s.,.,,1t., -, -, S,,,,tt
arm nan -, woman ari DANGER. AMI ca freo
f.|,,, ,.-ndfc,f,r.rsse ~, .vcits,,k.,. ~ a,y
s,rt was Me mind mat i, cos, rim yotbin,
~, s.a,d 1,nn ,ba rseo,,f,ion =. crt,,,ro.s ~
1881 Witch decIarad thar tbs. wv ,yae
v,aa.aa s-Ierv ~ r,-esar,,e ,t,a I,-io,, Fyars.-
hing he w-ro-a e,orv.hina, 10 ala wa. +,
Linz with Ms dpctara+fon tn Nr S,.,,h.,g
quoted nv Mr. Waitersor and rnnrir,n'4 hv
The many voluntary Witnesses who rarna IN
Mr.. Watterson's support for Mr.. water
son knowinq tina, he mai hon, rlcsa whit,
the line of the facts Of the record made mn
ado about the matter. moi even m advertis,
his lecture which has not required mere.
triclous agencies ana has NOR, than an
swered the expectations Of it's author
Mr. Wat,erson regrets that Judge yea.
gan has seen fit 10 recur 10 question
he thought was settled. He was SURPRISED
by the passage in Judge Rcagan's Nashville
address but lie concluded not to revive
an issue which. aside from seeming nm
gracious TO fraternal occasion can M,
in the nature Of the case f~.very agreeable
as retrospection, or profitable az a sub-
ject OF present discussion. The insistance
of Judge Reagan in keenlng IL aIiva and
in urging view which is contradictcd
by the begt and amplest testimony leaves
him no other alternative. He il lust as
free from any lust acrusation Of a r,,r,oso
wa ''vut any 9ou'heil ASPECT OF the