New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1897-09-22

en,ov IN our ports The Identical privileges when
disc tne S many e Snjoy IN said foreign Country
II will be observed that it recognizes the exis KS
the President power BY section 4:22s that could
only be exercised when no discrliia'naeln The
amendment provides that the power r1ay be eTGr
csed to meet and respond to paFta nriycge
duties as well-reciprocatlnS th' 'A"'' P'''"N .
though less than total exemptions. a., roferorces
but. Notwithstanding this confusion the act d9 zoe.
recognize the existence Of and extendS he
effect Of this? The act and the pngley bill were
passed on the same day. and 40 20, I b rccon
ciled II either repeals the other, II Is cnN III
Implication The rule O OF III %g lscs Sere mus lie
more than differeaoe-there must be irr'cohc''a"''
conflict.
SECTION 4.22S NOT REPEALED
After citing several authorities in support oi Ms
position the Attorney General continues
Section % and Section 422s and am 'ndrnei'S ere
ROT coexensve In scope: in purpose thercI0,v' ~
NAV be the compliments or edch olu'', ,roD which
scrbes n rule the other The condllloh upon ondnd
aud The agency by which il may ne suSpl 'u ~
Each therefore has its purpose-dernio 90 Section
eistert Section i22s might he a proNlSo 10 .c'
% smd &c i'm eject made so by the Suspension act,
and as such proviso il is certainly not rep"3"'''
The latter has its w snct,o rs
passage continuing until ne con1' nn account Of
them resuming again If the reciprocal W nc
of foreign nations be WthdpaWn Tho nroysion in he
Dneley hil for reciprocity Of trade Is such an Ne 10
ample Under that the duties OF thc "'' '""' ~
changed. 5000.
The Attorney General then quotes several as
IN sunnor Of a conclusion he reaches, that Whe'e
there Is difference in purpose legislative PROVISIONS
NAV he independent. and then continuing says
But the rule of repeal by implication does hQt re-
oure us 10 find independence IT there Is nOt IL
amelia blo conflict the laws may exist losel'i'I
we have already seen. there Is certainly 10 "I,art
cilable conflict Even II there was noIc ro'' .h,s
in their language-mo In their pun poS 49,
would have 10 yield the nterprs alton OF te Ui nv
and manner Of their passage Inc SusPelII.olt b
was reported TO the House OF RepieStut NJ.
The same committee which reported tic -. 80
h;IIwas considered and passed while that acI MaS
in memory. 1t passed the senate whi,1 d '' Vas an
lev hill was pending in consideration ana Was ~
moved hy the President on the same 1ay 't to
bngley bill was knowledge or us rsiat'bbnS 90
that hill and it's effect on II must lhtl 40 80 No
fribucd IN the Legislature II may De II va" al US
latter bill for THE Congrcss onal fecoi" ,,,
that the Presidents approval or II WI =. ~ NC
nicated 10 the Congress subsequently 10 'h"t VI '
other. ..,.. ,,tcb, no taken II
mas hold in Mead against BagnaH ana OH .H,,to
Wis 15O that where the provisions OF d 80 ~
which relates TO Il particular class OF cases ar ~
nranan, 10 those Of another statute approNeu u,e
Pusn",S 81, which is of a more general character.
the former must prevail as 10 the partggdai ,h on
The INTERPRETATION of statutes. section -io anu '
cited. 49,, e.o.,o,, 4 oos vas NOT re-
nesled bv Section %. and that the hieor,n}
So.h inni,iries Is not be subjected 10 uiSV'i'i
mating duty.