Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1897-02-12

Arnold and b. y Neitch. defendants.
VOU AXE HEREBY REQUIRED TO AP.
L pear IN an action brought aganst you
W me above named plaintih in tue District
court OF the THIRD Judicial District of the
state OF Utah, and to answer The complaint
illed therein within ton days (exclusive % tho
Jay OF seryicel after the service on you of
this summons--if served within tins county
or II served out of this county, but IN this dis
trict. WI hin twenty days; Otherwise within
forty dHys-or judgment by default Will DO
said complaint.
he SAID action Is brought to have Judgment
against The defendants for the sum of s27s.l {
principal aud interest thereon on at the ratio
OF per cent per nnnum from aud since June
20 1895, less 81 paid August "a, 1855, S paid
August "a, 1875. $3.50 paid August 81, 1850, SO
puld september !. lesl, ana 10 % paid october
Z, 1885. For $50 attorneys fees aud costs of
suit alleged to be due iho plaintiffs from the
dofendant, Hugh A Arnold upon a certain
prgmissory noo, executed by the ssid
defendant, Arnold, to the plant ia
on the eath day OF June. 1884,
for ,r the sum Of s2isil que IN one
per cent per Hnnum; tho same being duo
ana wholly unpaid, save aud except the scms
hs above set forth. being secured 10y mort.
gage OF even datc Herewith ON the promises
hereinafter described. executed by the de.
PENDANT, uugh a. Arnold, and his wife susan
Arnold. to the plaintiffs that these plaintiffs
are the lawful owners and holders OF satd tote
and mortgage, that by the terms OF SAID mort
gage the anoye named defendant. hugh A.
RTnOlu, hETctu TO pay u TGhrO0ADle attorneys
foe; TO nave the usual decree OF this court for
the foreclosure OF SAID mortgage, and the ealG
OF SAID premises. adiudging The proceeds of
said sale may be applied 10 the payment OF the
amount found due to these plaintiffs, after tho
payment OF the COSTS OF the Gourt and er-
penses of the sale; that defendants, and all
persons cl aiming under them, Ue barred and
foreciosod of ali claim or equity OF redemption
IN snid premises, and every part thereof, that
plaintiffs have judgment and execution against
the ehid defendant, Hugh A. Arnold, for any
deficiency which uny remain after applying
all he proceeds of the sale OF said
sntisiacuon OF snid Judgment That
the plainuii or any party 10 TINS suit may be.
come purchaser NJ said sale that the sheriff
execute u deed TO the purchaser; that the pur-
chaser lie let into POSSESSION OF SAID premises
on production OF the snerih's deed therefor;
and that the plaintiffs have such other aud
further relief in the premises as TO this court
may seem Just and equitable
sa11 premises arc described rs follows: Lots
nfty-one (6I), 1fiy-two (52l IN Block three t3)
IN Central Park subdivision OF Lots l, 2and
and ID IN hlock a. Ten Acre Hat a." Big
Field survey. Same bel situate in salt Lake
City and county. Utah.
Ans you are hereby notified that IL you fail
to appear and answer the said complaint
as above required. the said plaintiff Will apply
to the Court for tho relief demanded therein.
witness the Honorable Judges, and tho seal
OF the District Court OF tho Third Ju.
dicial District, in and for the state OF
isEALl Utah this 22nd day of January. in
the year OF our LORD one thousand
eight hundred and ninety seven.
DAVID Z. DUNBAR, Clerk.
by GRo. ID. LOOMS, Deputy Clerk