The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-06-13
THE HIGHER COURTS.
Second District.

Fort Worth. Texas. June 12.-Conrt of
civil appeals proceedings today;
Motions for reheariug submitted
Thompson d Son VS.. Mcmillan & Son, from
Wichita, Bryan ct al VS.. Piersou. from
Haskell; Eddleman ct al VS.. Crystal Palace
FIGURING Mills company, from Parker
Parker VS.. Reed, from Wichita, Mrs. s. Nj.
Collier VS. New York Building and Loan
association, from Wichita: Morgan Jones'
receiver, VS. Shaw, from Wichita; Martin
Brown company VS.. City National bank ct
al. from Hardeman; Henderson ct al VS..
Brown, from stephens; VIM. Caps re
ceiver, VS.. w. l.. Garvey, from Archer;
Western Union Telegraph company vs..
Thompson, from Eastland.
other motions submitted-Ward VS.. NJ.
A. Wilson ct al, from Clay. 10 affirm on
certificate: Ward VS. Wilson ct al, from
Clay, to file record Morgan Jones' re
ceiver VS.. Latimcr from Clay, TO certify
10 the supreme court; Beeville & Gibbons
VS.. Merchants Insurance company from
| WISE 10 postpone submission (agreemenD.
motion granted and cause postponed until
first setting in October.
Postponed for one week-Ferguson ct al
VS. Welch. from Denton, for rehearing
Potter ct al VS.. Kennedy. from Wichita,
| for rehearing
Cases ubmltted-McLeod Artesian Well
| 'SilIaHS Va tIaIs, from vienna, tiOOS-
ton and Texas Central Railway company
VS.. Ritter from Tarrant; Germany VS. City
OF Gainesville, from Cooke; Thompson &
Son vs.. Mcmillan G Son, from Wichita
AXtell vs.. Quad. from Cooke: Burgess vs.
Missouri Kansas and Texas Railway COM
pany, from Tarrant City of Fort Worth
VS., Isaac sherro from Tarrant.
Passed to Juno l9-Hargardine Mitricl
Dry Goods company VS.. Conneleo, from
| Eaetland
Cases affirmod-Tcxas and Pacific Rail.
way company VS.. Watson ct al from East
land; Butler VS.. Garvey. from Archer
katharine Kuhn ct al VS.. Foster from
Tarrant; Rembert. administrative, vs.
Wood from Potter; Garfield ct al VS.
Moore ct al. from Wichita.
Reversed and rendered--Barlley VS.
Wood from Tarrant
reversed and eh,auded-Chicago, Rocl
Island and Texas Railway company VS.
Williams, from Montague.
Motions for rehearing refused-Iohn T
Thompson & Son Va. Mcmillan g. Son, iron
Wichita, Mrs. :. NJ. Collier vs.. NeN
York building and Loan association. fion
wichita Western Union Telegraph com
pany VS.. Thompson from Eastland; Hen
dor5on ct al VS.. Brown, from Stephens
Mrs. Sue II. rrenshGw VS. Harris, ifoi
BOsqGc. Phoenix Assurance company VS.
Davenport. from Denton two motions'
|
pany VS. Hannig, from Clay; capps, re
ceiver vs. Garvey, from Archer,
other motions declded-Ward vs. Wilso
ct AL from Clay. to file record. granted
Eastland National Bank VS.. Arnistroni
from Eastland to affirm on cerh'lcat'
granted; Ward vs.. Wilson ct oil, trol
Clay to affirm on certificate, refused
Morgan Jones, receiver, VS.. i.atimer' lroI
Clay, to certify to the supreme court re
fused Phoenix Assurance company
Davenport, from Denton, for additions
findings 1.-TWO motions). refused; miiier
al w. Lancaster. from Hood, for aad'ton'
findings. refused -.
ON the motion for rehearing In Gist "
Fast. from Archer. the motion was o's'
ruled but judgment reformed 80 rs 10 w
cree a recovery for seventy-eight acres
Cases set for July 3-Borcers VS.. M Ma,
from Donley; Telegraph company Ts. IAN ~,
oron Mill and Elevator company, from a.,
rant: Horn vs. Kimball, from NJ IIey NJ
Knight VS.. Some. from Dickens Posey "
Aiken, from Callahan.