The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-02-13
Il Court DECISIONS
|. ], o,l.'o's Handed Down
4. i.tsst Sitting
| ,.,ra CRIMINAL APPEALS
...aer verdicts by
a. . =. John Edward"
IF =. . Rape Alarmed

uln,. ,..m kaufman; CONVECTION
Ms pissol-A0si0n '0'
~ ..,o,ore dismissed. because
u ree,ted the offense as uh-
p'a .s,0s arms" Attached to the
an, ,..r,us is an affidavit maze
% ~. county clerk. in which he
s !, y. 'p pseosnilance should have
.-,,ly carry on and about ms
-, and it was a clerical mis-
\. sl.,t. No certified copy Of the
!. sJed. and it is not shown
'o \. nrecognizance on the minutes
.,r.slur ii into the record
n Davidson, j.
vcruRE. from Eastland, con
y si,ing a prescription 10 De
W a,,s,uips intoxicating liquor
usmissed' d.
.,,,,,nce Is fatally detective IN
4, that this prescription was
a the qualified voters of sa,a
:, a.tsrmined at an election held
ss,so.s that the sale Of intoxlcat-
', " mould be prohibited therein
" Davidson, j.
opcrs and JOHN JACKSON
ssal,nd; conviction for keeping a
irr-Appeal dismissed
|. but one recognizance in the
AVA that is Joint. Where parties
! IoIutly indicted and convicted
,,eute an appeal, each convicted
.slInr must give a separate recog
by Hurt, P. ].
HINTS, from Eastland; conviction
Eating the local option laval
,xmeut Of facts Is not signed by
nor approved by the judge. 1t con
Yours, ETC., S. G. Counts" 1t car
pc,ldered. The only question is a.
sraicency Of the Information. II
mare Of Mr.. Nat P. Jackson. whC
Ne case for the State: "If the in
n Il not sufficient 1t ought to be
b enough for six, charging every
vu The organization Of the count,
h 0, appeal in this case, including
~ embraced In the local option
the petition to the proclamation
Stewart or Steele cases eve
d. 10 fact, II contains everything
tnd q vast deal 1t could do with
which does not hurt 1t. In the alb
The statement OF facts, the charg,
factory. II expounds the local op
most leafnedly in connection will
exciting history Of that branch o
sprudence, and is In addition NOS
md wssntlally signed. yours re
u, ETC."
20 by Hurt, P. J.
N THOMAS. from Hood; convic
: carrying plstol-Reversed.
hAivit Ia this case Is made befor
tttcney Of Erath county charg
~ to have been committed /
~ We think the authority @
ktntys to take affidavits is con
nkf respective counties, henc
v rtotney Of Hood county had n
nrse the affidavit made befor
n rlorney OF Erath county, as
spa which to base the informa
III ase.
Nv Henderson, ].
WILLS. from Harris; convictio
rtar-Ailirmed
ny question raised In the motto
!" Hal Is based on alleged newl
testimony. The affidavit do,
nat he discovered any fact know
aaofe the trial. This affidavit do,
ny Of the testimony within an
uoe 10 granting new trials @
NY discovered testimony.
BY Henderson. ],
~ md ROBINSON. from Hoo,
dp "a ior violating local option law
'0snliance in this case is a ,oi,
y and Is therefore fatally defe,
~ By Henderson. ].
Reversed, ''''' inert
a''eses misconduct of the iu,
As o'her evidence after the
y, '0,wi'., the statement of o,
~'' ne knew defendant and h,
ID s' ,s,, 70 ,,I steal calves and butch
,uDn M, saeIn to negroes. This allog
,u,a,, 'se. oy the affidavit of +,
y. .,,'ls and is not con,rovertcd \,
Il ,na a.ement was preiudicial to t,
VI W Henderson ]
ssi ts :; R. HAYES. from Victor,
,M in ~, pr nail-Reversei and h,
= 'ne sum OF $1,000. ''
!, ~ y It is not evident from +
n nv. mat appsllan, is guilty Of
''' and Is therefore entitled
% BY Henderson, ].
~ siV ,s'., from Waller. c,ov,,,,o,
*s.., ,'s, .nlne years Reversed.
y -. 'On'ends that the verde,
s,, ~ a., arrived a, by lot, Ten Of
~. mat it was agreed each IN,
!. N.Y. down his individual yc 'T'
,sn saoe' Of Years Imprisonment, ,
t,r,., We're 10 be addoa ,o-.,
kh,s. " Twelve and the ou 9th'
4. :. verdict. 1t was further = 1r'
wi y amount was ascertsIpoG as, -
bows s,s bound by the result Ono
sanatssa' i rs. that when the p ras
y much Two NC, Of the Jurors s4 said res !
c,.ssils s ss. By some Of Il the sg iprs =
! tSs arrived s.s, at was hi bIn Amy = /.
Y c,,s lar.icla s,r Jury {