The Lambertville record. [volume] (Lambertville, N.J.) 1872-1968, 1897-04-21
April Court.

April Court.
A large number Of people were present
at the opening Of the April term of Court
last Tuesday.
Justice Gummere presided and the
usual formsliiies were observed Of swear
ing in the Grand Jury.
The Court then took up the matter OF
application for hotel licenses. Most OF
the licenses are granted at the Spring
term, and the following is u list of those
granted together with the fees
Calvin Hill, Reavlle, Sl50
Jacob X. Wilson, Sergeanlsyille, 800.
5. W. Kitchen, New Hampton, 800.
Geo. w. llance, Milford, 1925.
Edward Humphrey, Glen Gardner, $3.50.
w. II. l.oLdenberger, Junction, 1928
Bertha Morrison, Annandsle, 1925
Chas. f. Thompson, Piustown. 800.
L. Humphrey. Remington, $27h
W. Ii. Lake, Pennington, S275
5. II. Mount, Pennington, 1915
John Corcorau, Milford, 500.
Mrs. Kate Able, bloomsbury, Sl25.
Wm. b. Bovine, Qaakertown, 500
II. 7. Milburn. Pattenhafg. 300.
Charles Eut, West Portal, 500.
John Burns, Ringoes, Sl2j.
John w. Hoffman, New Germaniown,
800.
Richard H. lIoljes. Bspiisttown, 300.
Edward Schrug, Little York, 800
VIM. HOLES, Mt. Pleasant, 800.
A. :. Case, Three Bridges, $3.50.
Ida NJ. Mcirs Lebanon, 1920.
The application Of Ida NJ. Meirs tc
keep an inn and tavern in the town Of
Lebanon, was then considered by The
Court, AS n remonsirance had been filed
against the granting Of this license. This
remonstrancc being only To the tiieci
that this hotel was not needed there, il
was aitcrward withdrawn, and the licens,
granted.
The Court list Of causes VAS lAen re
viewed. Justice Gnmmrte stated that NJ
petit Juror would hereafter he excuset
from service ON the panel without a per
sonal attendance In Cont at the time o.
seeking 10 be excused, or certificate
from the attending physician stating tina
said juror ia sick and unable 10 attend
the oidrr Of the Court
The first case taken up by thu CouI
was No. on the Supreme Court list
Bloomsbury National Bank vs.. f S. Tay
Tor ct al This was a suit on ptomis
sorry note The defendants, withou
going TO trial, permitted judgment OF
Relcla to be entered against them fo
th" full amount chained, nearly ( 400.
No. ;. Joseph Banghart ". Cyrus f.
Housed. This Was an action in TeIt
brought by plaintiff who lives at New
Hampton, for damages Tor the loss OF ser
vices Of his daughter Annie, by reason oi
being seduced by The defendant, in July,
'9G The defence was that Housed did
not meet plaintiffs daughter until after
TINT time, and TINT therefore, he WINS moi
guilty. Verdict 5000 IN favor Of plaintiff
No, 8. Warford L. Nixon ". Jacot
htiSiihNs MS tbsN WIS oilliNu Nht VI
Court
No 4. Daniel 5. Fox VS. Lehigh Willie
Railroad Company aud the Etston y
Amboy Railroad Company This is an
action in rort for damages claimed tC
have been sustained by Plaintiff III tn,
sum OF 81 900 on account Of the building
OF The defendant companies' foad het
near Clinton. In February, '0G, Their,
was a heavy ircshel aud plaintiff claimi
that 10y reason of The building of sait
road he'd whereby The channel Of tn
stream WINS changed, thus causing al
overflow on his lands, his farm was dam
aged TO the extent of the above amount
The jury went to view the grounds in
volved, on Thursday afternoon.