The Hawaiian gazette., 1897-02-19

,o the Soansy givsa at he po-s Of sx~
To-E-
New Il Es2y readily ~ believed tAss
tie s1Ez- Tlzaesrs o, British Guiana
are nos n ; very PROSPEROUS conditions
tss re7s- T.e-y Character 81 TIE IN
practicable Suggestions put forward n
sce circular clo.es above iE stss,t SlsS
seS1S that their I1iuS.Tv IS suffering
svsrslT, Il NAY ~ easily understood
t1zss = es3l - prices, s1oA Is thar n
5c Ted q The S11-g0s-. q TIE cSSs
las ssr.gss33v embarrassed the indus
Try Sui lg uS1 scarcely be credited
-hst S2cA 5 sSl q prices II 81 Industry
vascA cSz produce sugar from cane
Eo-s e2sSPiy7 thza Uns-Asi6iSed
h.sSt-SgEz- can - produced Is due 20
thle E1-erszl sugar A,ol1sies- Accord
fr.s 10 their cEl S6-lSSiou. re pfz2-
te-S have an advantage ever the heeS-
sugar r-o51cs-S which AZ tsSs- p&TzlS
ccg--.s- Balances tie aoua1sS> and =
shs tzn II value @ their exports 81
S-zz- daring the las twelve or thS--
.esz ysars- from - SIS ~ 70 = SSS :
rs. i zos due. sxcs9z probably - s
-
ties II Is quite clear that 3 counter
vz45li1s bounty o. duty would not -
sore he ol6 prosperity % the sugar
Industry q British Guiana Cane 81
gz- is E-0vl IN The United States an I
Il Is protected. excsgt SIS regards E2-
EzISzn S1Ssr. by very heavy duty;
h1c IN spite Q. this duty. German best
sugar is bsi1g imported into the United
S1z-sS II Quantities which Sre i1e1s3S-
inz hy lszqs Sl6 hounds TIE toszi for
We first eight Elo17hs o. this ys1r. rs
ws pointed Ont the o.her day. being
estimated q nearly e-,el ssl lal&losN. -
sEai-sc o2lT asocE rs a'so GAseles. for
The corresponding period II 1884 2nd
about Isl .5f,5. Ja1los- for the frs eight
E1ozshs 12Sz ysszr. What reason Is Lhess
then 70 suppose that = subsidy 10 TIE
British Guiana planters OF : counter
yzSli1g hc1asy would be effective il
cloSszg ne British market 10 beet
r. O. enhancing the selling Prfcs
q. Guiana Sugzrs Fer the rest the
Ee-s6leS suggested are quite ont o.
question ne GEizEz Planters are 10,
the only pe-So1S who have had 70 fzeS
an enormous fall q prices British
.zEit--.ItuEiS1S hare suffered in ths
sane Wy. and hew can they b ex.
F'scte5 70 give With the MS Of n;
people Of The mother country. : sra.
tu5-v 10 1he colonial SCszr-plan1ezs
Il would = JUS IS reasonable 10 Isl
ne planters 70 contribute uc the sup
E pert Of English wheat-groEs-s- Ant
E1s-s are such S16Si6ies 70 Stop1 ri
tie szZs reasons s coln-e-T1ilin.
E dizzy Is equally out q the question: q
Z such . duty were imposed in the IN
E ta-aS1 Of colonial sugar planters. rs
I ral5aEory duties II The assumed inter
sslS Ct OzhsE colonial. and also in II
4 interests Of home Industries could no
b refused For II DoSz ezss-shzt c
American coIo7 gods for instance
protective duties operate As boua1s
On experts As for the arrangement c
E 3 Ezlropsz- Conference for Tie ss1ega
I abolition a bCEltisS- there could
Z II oo5ec1o1 10 IT, If II Esrs likely
Be Elective B-t can znybo5
suppose thai : proposal for sue
: conference trol tie British GoFsr1
-sz. would De sSsetiTss Soone- c
later me beauty giving countries ma
zEskel q : perception q the foolish
EsSs q Thsir system and arrange SEC
= conference znolsst themselves: N
Y IN what o1D1i1 ground could 3
claim % discuss Sas matter With them
s-Ns1cEsS7sr Guardian