davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17
LATn LEGAL DECISIONS


i. a certificate Of deposit reclting that n Il.
70 Do left six months. and adding INA
interest after maturity" is held, in rowie
vs. ~. starr SMinn) SO l.. II, A., aga To he a
mat TO hold an indorser payment n,,st
% demanded at the end Of six months
On the last day OF grace
An lhterate maker induced by fraud IA
sisn note and mortgage, suppos,nr !, w.
Is ssnahg other Instruments. Is ha,S a.
Srecn VS.. ,Wiikio Gowa) SO u. a. Ro al ~
not TO be liable. even when the note 10 sJ H.
the hands OF an innocent purcha ssr 20 ~
less no was guilty OF negligence IN mn, IN
tne note. This is on the ground that hss
was never a party 10 the contract can 'e
talhed IN the instrument With this co.s
the authorities are collected SHOWN. w ~ =
general rule, and the exceptions thsrs ..,'
as TO the effect OF fraud In obtaining ~. ~,
,,ss OF note as against a bona t,a Se
Failure. OF the apparent maker - :.
puaiata his forged signature 10 n,,,a
when a IL first shown him, and even ''g p,e
statement that the note WIN he ns,d us sS
held N Traders National bank Va n are
ers SMassl % 4. r. A.. 90, 10 be ny -.
sufncient to render him liable unless ths
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17
Carpets.

We anticipated rise Ia ~ =,
Carpets. Subsequent events hsyar !,
we We're correct. We acted On ~,
ment and bought a large STOCK X:
now sell them cheaper than other "
can buy. =
To prove what we say we WIN
sell this week Brussels car. 1
pets, per yard .........,....u,. .
Moquette Carpets; Z
this week at (per Yard q
$50 rolls Mating. 40 yards to the Il
roll, worth $500; this week at -
A few shades left that we are seyin
than cost-1Oc, 15c and 25c.
Lace Curtains, a
3 yards long, pair ........... =
Lace Curtains, II
3 yards long, pair .............
Curtain Poles, in Ebony. Cherry
Walnut and Oak 5 feet long,
with Brass Trimmings, com
pltte, each .......................
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17
FORECASTS BY FOSTER.
Temperature Normal In the Southern States, and
Light Rains Predicted for Texas.

last bulletin the
from the 10th the 2d and the will reach the Pa
central valleys 18th to s7s Eastern Ems. m States States, s =, a.,
h Rockies
High temperatures the Northern
~ cold ~ave will r IN Northern STATES not far from the as
0'N normal As rams V WEATHER = CYCLES
weather cycles the weather certain
orthodox scientists declare that NO such cycles exist The present secretary
few Of US declare that there weather cycles and the author these
bulletins preparing the preuded scientists
One of these length Of wenty hours the other
average is the vamest part of
the day that midnight TIL
Influences thar
.s s'1 @ Go s a ss ss%sss s
'r'aa' serve s''a a the mature
curves as s sozs s sys 'd v as d
and GIs ha n so s @ ne os.
Wonder n ss Na hss declare sSsIs
pod "' e ' i aadns %ea 1S
A Te S i a"s sS dnd Hess for ns a oroe4
n on as THIS o g' '1as s eyGS sn by the Gyea
s a,ers%y ~sh R
sSS so is' u saa ' . @ 70 s s aae ssns
% %s s But s 1 nc @ s9"sF ss Ha . " a ga;s
ha
and
n al
Technically
,. AZ Vino ,s r pse ssso1S s a ]
a cent article written - ' Ivan
1 asya@,s s would Dc weather
fore9 the
s s s' sS sna result n. ss ,s s the sps
s 4: ..s' ,. ;s:' ;': g; s s. @
Inc 1inles In
stem
an Gcur understanding aud the
the ntlnentsa
Tho likewise
800
tho pgshN laws fuly the
bo indulge the eynd
~ ~ ~ '"'e"i '''0"'
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17

Mai Orders Promptly 3Ued
William L. Foley, 21 49,! Fl! !!!.! 4

ton against his creditor for such an eva
sion of the exemption laws of their dom
lcil by collecting the debt in another
State.
Power to exercise the right OF eminent
domain for the rclocattcn of a rai.road
Is held in Busby VS.. Kansas City, Mem.
phis and birmingham Railroad company
tM.ssp 80 l.. II. A., $40. TO be not implied
merely because the recreation would avoid
payment Of damages for injuries to lands
and crops by Hood water caused by a
prior Improper location. A note to this
case reviews the authorities on the right
TO relocate railroad. The case Itself
overrules decision in i2 Miss, 555, and
says; THE opinions found In that volume
are the utterance OF a tribunal appointed
oy tho military satrap who then ruled
IN prostitute commonwealth, and have
no other binding authority upon us than
that each case therein must be regarded
as res judicata."
The knowledge of creditor that his
debtor IL heavily in debt is held. In FEEDER
VS.; Erwin Crenn.) SO l.. r. A., 1856. Insult
OF his debtor In satisfaction OF His debt
fraudulent as to other creditors. The null
utnde OF cases on the right of a creditor
20 buy property from his debtor In salts
faotfol. of the debt are compiled In the
to this case.
a note held by a nonresident which is
payable where he resides is held. in Ward
Us. Boyce On. ~ IS l.. r. A., $40, to be
IN no sense properly OF the debtor, or
wthln the power Ct the courts at the
debtors residence. for tbs purpose OF max.
NE any decree in trustee process affect
ing its title or ownership.
Inc treasurer OF q private corporation
nasHg as such moneys of the CORPORA :
q, IN ms hands is held, IN Mayo VS.. Mil.
wausee Amuseuent company (Wis) ss
!. x A., ISL. to be subject 10 garnisSO
!. mche ON Judgment against the earnora-
'son. A note to this case shows he con-
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17
BuTTER AND Eggs.

st. Louis, October 16.-Butter oulet.
creamery 1Gassls: dairy 1iGl6 Eggs quiet
New York, October l6,--Eggs quiet re-
cents 2bi6 packages; State and Pennsyl-
wanna l6alSta: Western l6ik6liT.
~ Shlcago. October le.-Bwdter firm: dairy
S s,~is: creamery lon2l. Cheese quiet. So
w Eggs firm; fresh i4ta.
Kansas city, October l8--Butter-S STEADY
ana active: creamery. 20fI2e; dairy. liSriT
M nsss-- nohanyed; fresh candled Missour;
ana Kansas stock, Ill.,
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17

| contributory negligence a. ~ r
clude his recovery OF daiiAs
other. no NJ
in possession of land bougn' ~ n
| which the father intenos wus
him, is held, in Home Insa Il
| Mendenhall Qll.) 36 l.. X. nnr,h q
was bought at a master rssn b
and the deed has not yeI I'm II
cause the time for connr'
port has not elapsed.
Placing fireworks In tns ID Il
residence for use the mex S n b.
of July celebration - hs new Z
Phoenix Mutual Fire insu voA q
(Pa) 81 l.. r.. A. 5li, ~,rder d
surance on the buildns skHt
prohibiting fireworks 70 ~
or allowed on the prelIslss.r onul
or custom of trade 10 "N
withstanding.
The liability of a munic!ps,s'2s. W. I
ege to premises by surlaca q .
ing from changing the gIs~Sod
is held. in Jordan vs.. benissd b =
IS l.. r. A. 5i9, to be l1Jqlssts q
which the water Is me1C
upon the lot in o BODY Sscs o.
mere fact that the sui., scfg
terfered with or its nov.
change of grade is fnst
the city liable.
An ordinance Regulates. IA y!
of hours in which laboreiS ss6k &
shall be employed on tae dppskin :
longing TO the city. ana VA IA D !,
ton a misdemeanor, - pk
McNaily Ha.) IS l.. 4, An IN ersi
as the legislature oniy
an offense.
For the loss OF the ~ y
child who puts her hana M. W
{. coffee grinder IN q slo.s sS
there with her father to
Ii is held, in Holbrook v
se L. r. a. rs. thai
not u2bla.
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17
Gents Furnishil

% dozen Guyot Patent su.,..
ers, same quality Won NJ ea y
$3.50. ..,.........
loo dozen English Merlno sM,,.
ana Drawers, full f,rtss
French Neck, Stockinet ' W,sn:
Bands, per garment M
90 dozen Derby Fibbed ~.
shirts and Drawers: orr q.
quality; for
100 dozen Hermsdorf Fast pI,..
and Tan Half-Hose; 15c mat
ity; for ~ sues'
20 dozen zen. 4-ply Linen Collars; Il
iaPVo .....,. ............,,...
% dozen 4-ply Linen Link Cum.
latest shapes
20 dozen Boys Waists nan
$500 '''''...,...s.s.,.,
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17

| protest against slavtsh devotion to an
t'quated rules and because II
oreathes the spirit of humanity and
SSHins.y, ana is based on thought of the
An evident and notorious abandonment
inr a ~ punkc road. with the physical clos
; iiS os ~ KNOWN to the municipal author
,ties, on the faith of which private nartia,
iiave expended money in improvernents
L. n R IN 4 BALDWIN w vs., Trimble CMdJ IS
agafns, a. iS, 10 constitute an estoppel
ment. VI '"e puoi'c case
me- calm of homestead exemption IN
When si ~ conveyed TO defraud creditors,
al cia r .iis su;t OF creditor and the land de-.
In kan, suoJect 10 his Judgment is upheld
s. L. r. vs. SI First s. National Bank Ala.5
ahu very elaborate opinions review H.
authorities on the subject on both sides.
n A b,,s ShaatS9to-y limitation on the rights OF
nrnna,,t 70 make gifts of community
sent without the wife's written con-
G GSn1' Is se held; in spreckels VS.. Spreckels
10 com Se =, X A. 4M, to be tnapplcabie
Inc me passage of the act. since the nus.
5aiu right In that property can NOT hs
Invested by statute. NV NC
The unlawful extraction NJ r.,ro,a,,
VI, or gas from land Is held, in Bettn,en
w; Harness CIV. Va.) SO l.. r.. A.. sSs 70
b he s,iu,a arreparable injury which NAV
S''oineu IN equity.
!. IA rSsesmg i,, IN pointing a gun at another
VS. sa un,ns she trigger IS held In Babel
sa a,ae BY the fact that the ne or az
uu,ng ~ mad used the ordlI.arv n,aans so ~
th at !, was the gun and sat;sf himself
sne person injured failsd "a n ~. thas
s s,,n on. OF dhe way when he saw thai the
t ns 49, about to be snapped. and hs1
- no - MA AAld TO eonsttuts suoS
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17

flict in the decisions of the different States
on the right to garnishee an officer OF
agent of a corporation on demand
against the corporation,
| Power to impose license tax upon non.
residents who carry ON business within
city limits is upheld in Petersburg VS.
Cooke (Va9 sc l.. r. A., 4S2, where Vie
rule was applied to an attorney at law
having an office in the city, but residing
outside.
"A mortgage upon personal property re-
moved TO another county before the mort
gage is recorded Is required in the case
OF Fassett VS.. Wise (Cal) IS l.. r. A..
500. to be recorded in the latter county
only.
An ordinance llmittng the speed of driv-
ing on streets 10 six miles an hour is
held. in state VS.. Sheppard (Minn) So
l., h. A. 3o5. to be inapplicable TO saN-
and as to them 1t Is held that the re-
stricton Is unreasonable and invalid. A
fote TO the case shows the other deci-
SONS on the. regulation of speed of vehi-
Power to license and exact a reasonable
zee Tor the use OF streets and alleys by
dSn; a IS held. in Tomllnson VS.. In.
within the general power to regulate ths
r rse on streets. And the fact that some
;,,N',ssns ar'ses from the licenses is held
nhsuincient u, condemn them. a nssta ~.
ms case complies the decisions On jcenso
ie's Tor the use of streets by vehicles.
~ I esstruction OF substantial portion
ueas'r premises without the iesasa,s
I TAU Is held. In Wattles vs. South omsbss
AZ as gu S- company (Neb1 az I. n
Tor rent 70 r release the lessee from Inability
ass med the risk of the ies,ructtonp feTsssiy
nr nvaa,ns me common law rule. ana ans ans
Esnsss. an opinion OF Judge Brewer IN I
ss sass nscauss Il : maSniaoanf
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17
Evening Posts Cablesram.

New York, October l6--frhe Evoniny
Posts London financial cable: The STOCK
markets We're good today. The feature
was the revival in Americans and Kaffirs
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17

4,sps for 90 days; posted rales 4 S2lhf5iS 3Is
aud 4,NFh, commercial bills Isl. bar SILVER
tSSA. MeAican dollars Az
state bonds lulet. government bonds
nrnl railroad bonds firm
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17

MONEY AND BANKING.

Houston. October 16Local banks report
the money market easy. Interest rates
are 7Gis per cent.
HOUSTON BANK CT,EARINGs.
The Following are the clearlngs of TN,
Houston banks for the week thus far ana
for the corresponding time last wear. To-.
EcthCr with the inprnaao. 1850 ~
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17

HOUSTON EXCHANGE.
Buying. Selling
New YORK slght.:,h dis Par to 81 dts.
american silver. Par Par
NEW YORK EXCHANGE.
ReichmarlSs COM
merclal, 60 days..,... 81 5-1S "a Ria
Bankers 60 days, o.
Commercial. 60 days. ..4.sis. Sia
Francs, commercial,
90 days .........,.,....52 3is -22js DOL
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17
London Money.

London, October 16.-Consols for money
u li-lb; eonsois for the account, iii ala;
Mexican ordinary, lgA. Bar silver STEADY
Z, Sled. Money, IL per cent Rate Of
uiScoullt IN Inc open market for short
bills "a per cent; three months. aid Nor
cent, ' ~
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17
$3.50 Jackets Now ST..
Capes.
$l.5O Capes for csc.

Ladies' Black Cloth Capes. "a inches
long. well made, all sizes, bought to sell
for Sl.50--
Now csc.
S. Capes for S3.25.
Black Plush Cape, 20 inches long. lined
with fancy lining, trimmed with Thibet
Fur. bought to sell for 5000
Now $3.2S.
S. Suits for S4.75.
AN Wool Serge Coat Suits, in Navy and
Black, coats half Silk lined, skirts lined
with Percaline. bought to sell for $500
Now $4.7S.
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17

fiict in the decisions of the different States
! ON the right to garnishee an officer or
agent of a corporation on demand
against the corporation
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17
Specials. This Week Only

Ginghams.
Turkey Red Calico.
Outing Flannels.
Dress Ginghams.
French PerCaIes.
Unbleached Domestic.
Heavy 1914 Sheeting.
Bed Ticking.
Heavy Feather Ticking
White Wool Flannel.
Red Twill Flannel.
1914 White Blankets.
1914 White Blankets.
Turkey Red Comforts.
Turkey Red Comforts.
Table Linen.
Table Linen.
Towels.
Hnck Towels.
Napkins.
Napkins.
Rustic Taffeta.
Aprons.
Baby Caps. '
La lies Vests. j
COrsets.
Wrappers. !
Wrappers. ]
Shirt Waists. !
Underskirts. 1
Children's Hose. 7
Ladies' Hose. s
Boys and Girls Hose.
Ladies Hose. c
Gauntlet Gloves. /
Kid Gloves. 5
Ribbons. \
Ribbons. N
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17

protest against slavtsh devotion to an
ttnua9ed rules and because il
n orHaiunes the spirit. of humanity and
Nineteenth century," Vi '"e
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17

The necessary expenditures of a county
' Wtneh are made mandatory by the corr.
;stlgutloh. and are provided for by tho
leslslatnre; are held. in Rauch VS. Chan
man SWash) SO l.. Il. A.. 407. to be ex.
GUIDED from the constitutional proyls,on
mining the amount Of county indebted.
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17

Ihe fact that u train was running NJ
ush speed in violation OF law and in
.neath OF inc promise of tho engineer
inauo 10 q boy who Intended to jump or
Is ned Nh Howell Va. Illinois CentrnI
haiiroad company (Miss) 30 L. X. A.. 5i5.
,nsntheienr TO render the raj road com.
ha Ia nabie Tor injury TO the boy, when
GER '''> ''"
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17

me iact that q person is blind IL hold
IN Nachery VS.. Mobile and Ohio Rqilroa,
uuvinpahy tMsso 30 l.. r. A., $40, insult.
fcient TO Justify carrier In refusi,c ~
accept him as a passenger.
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17

ton against his creditor for such an eva
sion of the exemption laws of their dom
ieil by collecting the debt in another
State.
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17

me solicitation of pictures TO he on.
~, OUTSIDE the state is held, in State
stitute Interstate commerce 80 ina,
privilege tax imposed upon II by state
statute, except when the soliciting IL done
py pnotosraphcrs OF the State, is held to
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17

Ihe misdeliyery of goods by an agent
~ 4 connecting line or warehouseman
Is held, IN Illinois Central RaIlroa1 cn,,,
pa,Y vs.. Carter .Ull.) 20 l.. II. A., 57. in
huinelent TO render the forwarding carrier
ilaple' whore IL safely delivered the goods
70 ne connecting line, for safe carriage
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17

holder had been induced thereby 10 40
sumo ana act upon the assumption tina,
we signature was genutne or was adj
united to be so. The note to the case
persons whose signatures nre forgn4 on
commercial paper Including the questions
o. estoppel ami ratification OF such sigma
The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1897-10-17

oil ne unlawful extraction Of petroleum
W. W. 81 gas from land Is held, in Bettman
cons uiiarness w. Va) So l.. r. a. 566 to
Do enjoined In equity. "'"en may
The times. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1890-1903, 1897-03-25
A NEWSPAPER WAR.

The fight I'm New York between the
newspapers is one Of the most interesting
bouts of the year. not excepting the affair
at Carson. 1t seems 20 be the neld
against the World and the Journal. and
then the World and the Journal against
each other. The World Is indignant that
this war should have been declared. but
the lab just below the heart is the charge
that II IS as bad as the Journal The
World protests that the journal is not
in its class. As for tho other contempora-
rles that have organized against 10. lie
World declares that they are prompted by
Jealousy and malice and presents a start
ling array Of figures showing an aggre-
gate OF twelve million dollars lost in the
various efforts that have been made and
are now being made 10 compete with the
World. Indeed 1t would appear. accord
ing TO the World. that It and the Herald
are the only prosperous and Independent
newspapers In New York. while all the
rest are hirelings and from year 20 year
pile UP mortgages instead OF profits.
This IL none OF our fight. but We ma
tursliy feet an interest in newspaper dis
putss. and we may be pardonsd for one
The times. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1890-1903, 1897-03-25

probably produce rulnous competition
between them that will bring no good 10
any one. There will be a period OF I'M
certainty In rates which is far more dis
astrous TO shippers. even though the
rates be low. than high rates.
1t is true the decision avoids a pooling
agreement that is trust" in effect. and
II was this fact that caused 1t 10 be at
first supposed TO be decision condem1a-
tory of trusts" in general But brief
attention 10 the case shows that this is
not so. Congress IS given power by the
Constitution to regulate commerce be-
tween the States and with foreign States.
No limitations whatever are put upon
its power. IL may regulate commerce.
and the means adopted for regulating
commerce are left wholly 10 Congress. IL
the commerce be between different States
or with foreign countries, II makes no
difference what regulation Congress
chooses TO impose the regulation is one
that binds.
But the decision that the Supreme
Court heretofore made in the sugar trust
case IS that Congress can make no regu-
lation that will affect business done
wholly within a State. II held that the
business Of refining sugar was one OF the
ordinary employments of life that are 10
be regulated by the laws Of the State
only. in which the business Is conducted.
When the sugar is prepared for market
and is sent out OF the state. the mo-
ment il touches the State line II becomes
liable TO any regulations that Congress
NAV have established, but while in pro-
cess Of manufacture. those who handle
It are subject TO the jurisdiction OF the
state only. There IS nothing in last Mon
DAVIS decision which modihcs this prin-
ciple I'm any degree whatever. so that
the question remains just as IT was be-
fore. how far may the legislation OF
State interfere with a trust agreement
that private parties may have entered
into between themselves.
That is q very great question: ano'
when it comes before the Supreme court
of the United States for solution, If only
il gets there in a form TO require its pro-
per and full consideration, and the iul
force Of the trusts side Of the case Is
presented. IT will demand the highest ex-
ercise Of the faculties of the human mind
for its proper decision.
The times. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1890-1903, 1897-03-25
.xrsTrRFsTING CASE.

We have referred elsewhere TO the opin-
ion Of the Supreme Court Of the United
States in the case Of the government
against the Missouri Freight As
sociation. a brief review therefore Of the
case will not come amiss in this connec-
ton.
The suit was brought in Kansas in lss2
by order Of the Attorney-General the
United States being made plaintiff against
eighteen railroad companies, forming the
association. as defendants. 1t was al
legged that the agreement Of the associa-
ton was in violation Of the act Of Con-
gress Of July ., 1890, Ito protect trade and
commerce against unlawful restraints
and monopohes,' better known as the
antitrust act.
The case was first heard before Judge
John A. Riner, Of the District Of Wyom-
ing. He decided that the agreement did
not violate the antitrust act, assuming
it to be true that the object Of the assoc
citation was. as the defendants alleged. TO
maintain Just and reasonable rates and
TO prevent unjust discrimination. Among
other things he said:
Il think IL cannot be said that the
public is benefited by competition when
that competition is carried beyond the
bounds of reasonable prosperity 10 the
parties engaged i'm 1t, for surely the clll-
zen investing his capital whether ln
railways or otherwise, is entitled 10 the
benefit of a contract which AFFORDS 10
him only a fair protection Tor MS invest
mcnt. and which does not interfere with
the rights Of the public boy imposing UNI
lust and unreasonable charges Tor SER
vice performed
The case was then appealed TO The
United States Circuit Court Of Appeals
and that court in 1898 sustained the court
below in dismissing tho complaint, but
Judge shiras filed a dissenting opinion.
I'm which, he held that the combination
was inimlcal to the public welfare and in
contravontion both Of the language and
spirit Of tho antitrust act
The case has now been passed upon by
the court Of last resort and Judge Shlras
is sustained. four out OF the nine judges
dissenting.
Justice Peckham, in his opinion, said
the case presented two questions OF i'm
portance. Does the Antitrust act apply
10 and cover common carriers by rail-
roads? II So does the agreement COM
planned of violate any provision Of that
act?'
The court finally holds: 1.-THE question
is one of law In regard 10 the meaning
and effect OF the agreement itself. name
Nv: Does the agreement restrain trade or
commerce I'm any way so as 10 be vi0-
lation Of the act? We have no doubt
that IT does. The agreement on its face
recites that II IS entered into for the
purpose Of mutual protection and vio-
lation subjects the defaulting company 70
the payment of q penalty. While IN
force. and assuming il 20 be lived up 20.
there can be no doubt that its direct inn
mediate, and necessary effect IS 10 put
n restraint upon trade or commerce ~
described In the act. We think the fourth
section of the act invests the Government
with fun power and authority 10 bring
such an action AZ this. and If the facts
be proved an injunction should issue"