The Wichita daily eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1890-1906, 1897-09-03

|; NJ. E Tatman VS.. E II. Anawalt; al
peal.
: W. s. Clements We. Red Mems Frate
a nal Accident association OF Americs
damages.
8 City of Cheney VS.. Barney O'Conno
appeal.
Cyrus A. Leland, receiver. VS.. Jaco
Pittenger ct al; foreclosure.
In the matter Of the appeal Of the exc,
iutratrixes of the estate Of Robert Blacl
: deceased, from the probate court; al
peal.
Ferdinand Hoffman We. Flora NJ. Rec
ct al; foreclosure
Ferdinand Wertheimer ct al vs. Mai
Wall and ]. A. Davidson; appeal.
The j. ]. Douglas company VS.. ].
Davidson; appeal.
w. H. Auchmoody va the city OF Vic
tia, Kan, and the Wichita Electric Rail
way and Light company: damages.
B. F. Mclean VS.. ]. F. Harris an
Mary c. Harris; attachment.
Nebraska State Bank Of West Point
Neb., vs.. Fritz Driller and Conrad Fishe
recovery Of money.
Crane company VS.. the Wichita Plumb
ing and Pump company; on account.
S. NJ. Tucker VS.. the Board OF Count,
Commissioners: appeal
L. S. Nactzger, administrator, vs.. G
W. Vickers ct al; recovery Of money.
Fife Felix (minor VS.. the ST Louis ant
San Francisco Railroad company; dam
ages.
Joseph Offenstein VS.. F. L. Cofield
damages by SANDER.
John Bower vs. Ellen Reilly ct al; for.
closure.
o. j. Seton Va T. ]. vennum ct al; re
plevin.
J. r. Mead vs. Walter Horner ct al
suit on note.
I. P. Campbell We. Atchison, Topeka
and Santa Fe Railway company; appeal
The Johnston Fife Hat company vs.
The Missouri Pacific Railway company
damages.
G. V. Wells Va D. T. Edglngton; ap-
peal.
Grant Banentine ct al vs.. T. F. Brown
ct al; suit on note.
Jacob Diffenbaugh vs.. Chicago. Rock
Island and Pacific Railway company
damages.
City Of Cheney VI. John Reed; ap-
peal.
Robert Massey vs.. The Atchison, To-
peka and Santa Fe Railroad company:
| damages.
A. McBro!de vs. q. 6. Hoagland: sui.
on account.
Isaac L. McHenry We. the Supreme
Lodge National Reserve associat ton; re-
covery of money.
The American Real Estate and Invest
ment company vs.. the Kansas Midland
Railway company; damages.
Emil Werner VS.. the Kansas Midland
Railway company; damages.
w. c. Dyer VS.. the Kansas Midland
Railway company; damages.
j. E. Dobyns VS.. A. E. Lawrence ct al:
suit on account
Joseph Cummings We. Bank Of Doug
las ct al; on account.
Mrs. S. NJ. Cornish Vs. H. Goss ana
Mrs. A. Fox; On account.
In the matter Of the appeal Of Jane
Smith from the survey Of section IL,
township 2S. range west; appeal.
James Sigerson VS.. The Cummings
Harvester company; recovery Of money.
Agnes Webster vs. ltohool disrr,ct No
a ct al; damages.
j. A. Bishop VS.. Arthur Faulkner ct NJ:
suit on bond.
NJ. j. Riffs W.. c. K. Freeman: appeal.
c. NJ. Henderson & Co. vs. S. d. Nc
Naughten: replevin.
Fred Mccain ct al VS.. Joseph W.
Jones ct al; replevin.
Ella Lawrence VS.. Charles Hoff ct al:
recovery Of money.
John A. Rupert and VIM. Chaltant.
receivers. VS.. Paul Mellinger; forecIos-
ure.
Mary Weist Va. city Of Wichita: DAM
ages.
G. v. Wells Va D. B. Edginston; ap-
peal.
J. W. Shuts vs.. Samuel Hoover: dam
ages.
c. II. Kerr W. Tribe No. Ii. Improved
Order Of Red Men: recovery Of money.
c. j. Amidon VS. the Milford Savings
Bank; recovery Of money.
Frank Garss VS.. D. A. Garst; recovery
Of money.
Rupert and Chalfant. Jr., receivers. va
VIM. H. Scott ct al: foreclosure.
Wllhelmina c. Richter vs. the Mutual
Life Insurance company OF New York;
recovery OF money.
H w. Reynolds Va. the sedgw;ck
Creamery ct al: damages.
7. N. Smith VS.. Thomas Frazier; ap-
peal.
]. A. Clark W. Thomas Smith ct al;
appeal
c. K. Freeman and r. E Lawrence.
partners as Freeman e. Lawrence. vs.
Rosa Rawson. Administrative. etc; re-
covery Of money.
City Of Wichita Va. A. NJ. Morris: ap-
peal.
]. G. Trimble vs. ". 3. Foster; trans
ferred from court OF common pleas.
Redmond Cleary Com. Co. vs.. S. g.
Richmond and J. r. swartzel: appeal
from Sumner county.
Elizabeth s. Burton vs James II. Ran
som: action to clear title.
Second National Bank OF Beloit Va G. |,
NJ. Dickson e. Ell: suit on note.
Erastus Brown vs.. J. L Chamberlain |
ct al; injunction.
Wichita Electric Railway company w. !
Isaac T. Ault: injunction.
Jennie n. Hayes vs. Frank r. Hayes:
divorce.
In the matter Of the appeal o: c. G.
Davis from survey OF sections and 20, |
to. %, 3 ".
A. Do-an. county treasurer. e. a.; IL