The sun., 1897-12-27

QUEENS was Three hundred and nftsen $40
Tho number Of ballots which were rejected
date d. uOfoi FOR 81 sSs once "a 81 coRoNER 6T IaE
was Five hundred and thrty.nve...".... oss
WE CERTIFY this statsment 70 be correct and
he ms%bs sPs Of e.. Board Of Pocs ao
OF them. this tenth day or December. one thousand
eight hundred and nin'''SsiSySsSSiK SSSSK MOSS.
AVERY D: ANDREWs
GEORGE MOORE snITH.
Police Department Of the City Of New YORK,
500 MULBERRY STREET.
NEW YORK, December 1oth, 1897
STATEMENT OF THE BOARD OF POLICE con-
nssjeNhas ms hs THs eTT eE THE hoard cIS OF
In relation to the vote given
For Members Of the Council.
tn. Board Of Police q ss sSs CITY q
10th days of December 1897 pursuant 90 the pro pro-
City Board OF 6anvassers of the City Of New York as
constituted by the Greater New York Charter 70 can
ss nnS Mp part. OF eonntss included within the City
New York =, constituted by ssid act a. the general
Aforesaid, do certify as follows:
rIRsT COUNCIL DISTRICT.
That It appears such estimate and canvass, that
The whole pgmSs5 Of q TS rStss S,ysn do5 ros sss
Tif. The FIRST COUNCIL DISTRICT was One
hundred and eightyfour thousand eight a. ss,
hundred and sixty hve. ................".. 1e>,eeo
OF which THOMAS F. FOLEY re-
oeivcd Thirty.four thousand four
hundred aud sirty.six. ............ ot,Aoo.
OF which JOHN 7. OAKLEY received
Thirty.four thousand three hun.
dred and ninety y.nine.. eA.bso
OF which MARTIN ENaEL received
Thirty.three thousand auo eighty.
Two. .............. oo,oos
OF which PATRICK T. CUNNING
HAM received Eleven thousand
sevop hundred and sixteen........ 1l,7lo
or which MAX J. PoRGES received
Eleven thousand three hundred
and forty. ty.one...................... aa,oel
OF which AUGUST BUERMANN re-
ceived Eleven thousand and SOW.
OF which CHARLES BAc1aALuPo
received Nine thousand and nine.
V'three..... ............................ s'vso
OF which HARRY D. KRAMERre-
ceived Eight thousand nino hun.
dred and seventy. seven. .........". e,sII
or which LOUIS A. HAUsER re-
ceived Eight thousand eight hun.
dred and forty-soven ............... o,0S7
or which JACOB BERNSTEIN re-
ceived Four thousand eight hun
dred and seventy.nve S,S7b
or which ROBERT aLAsER received
Four thousand eight hundred and
forty yhihe... .............''....... S'ose
OF which HERMAN ECKsTEIN ro-
ceived Four thousand eight hun
dred aud eleven. ................... ASH
OF which WILLIAM 8. KELLOGG
ceivod One hundred and fortyoue. lA1
OF which TIMOTHY n HoLDENro
ceived One hundred and twenty. lso
or which GEORGE B. HILLARD
ceived Ninety. ~
And OF which there were BLANK,
Six thousand nine hundred and
egnty-oho o'dol-i's'ooo
Tho number OF general ballots protested
smarkec for Identification" all of which
were counted for the several candidates
OF THE COUNCIL. was Eight hundred
and thrtyfour..... .......................''.. ees
The number of ballots which were rejected
auNtI hI,hN unfAf fnF anvr
date %; for oa the S"Sfn once S Of ME- MEMBER 3F THE
COUNCIL was counted. was Six hundred
enu tnirtF'tWo.......- oos
SECOND COUNCIL DIsTRlCT.
That It appears such estimate md csnvass. that
The wso,e OF %E%sFR Rs%f5 q Of ESsss f
THE SECOND COUNCIL DISTRICT was
Two hundred and twentyseven thousand
and twentythree SSf'VxS
| or which FRANK J. GOODWIN TO.
ceived Thrty.six thousand four
hundred and eighty eight .......... seAse
| or which CHARLES F. ALLEN re-
ceived Thirty-six thousand four
hundred and six................. eetoo
| OF which PATRICK ]. RYDER re.
| ceived Thirtysix thousand three
hundred and eighty. se.se7
| OF which RICHARD Fl. DERBY re-
ceved Nineteen thousand one ,
hundred and nifty eight. fg.lbo ~
| OF which ROBERT MILLER fsg|ok 5~&rrr
ceived Seventeen thousand hvo
hundred and eighteen. 1853
OF which FREDERICK f. CULVER
| received Seventeen thousand nvo
hundred and nine ................. l7,boo
| or which JOSEPH T. HACKETT re-
| ceived sixteen thousand four
| hundred and sixty eight. le.&ee
| OF which PATRICK H. MURPHY
| received Sixteen thousand three
hundred and twenty. y.nine. 1o.eae
| OF which ROBERT GORDON
Ss'sfa Srsd and siSsR :nSs..no wv" f &sss
or which ANDREW JOSEPH Hus. "a s ,/oG
SEY received Two thousand one . ~
| hundred aud eleven ............... a,lll
| OF which JOHN n. DAILY received
| One thousand six hundred and
| nt1 ....-.........'..' '.......'..''-. A'ooo
| OF which FREDERICK BLERsCHr re-
| ceved Ono thousand and forty
| four....... OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES. Luce
OF which HERMAN BoHs received
Nine hundred and sixty .nine...... o00
OF which FRANK HARTH received
Nine hundred and thirty.eght.... ese
| OF which JOHN J. GALLAGHER ro-
| oeived Five hundred and tweuty-
| eight. oHo
OF which WILLIAM FRANCIS
BYRSE received Tbree hundred
| and thirty throo roo.................-. o8e
| OF which O. w. MCCLELLAN re
ceived Two hundred and forty. SEQ
| OF which GEORGE GETHlN re-
oeived Two hundred and thirty.
| seNen ............. .......-.........'.'.. Sof
| or which FLETCHER HAMLIN re-
ceived Two hundred and thirty.
. tWo....... hbS
And OF which there BLANK,
Six thousand one hundred and
ninety'thre c..........-......-..... o,lsS-stTuE
The number OF general ballots "protested
as marked for Identification" all OF which
counted for tho several candidates
voted thereon for the once OF MEMBER
OF THE COUNCIL. was Five hundred
and seventy three Observation-Disclosures. OF
. \ Tho number Of ballots which rejected
| as void, which NO vote for any candi-
date for the ofnco of MEMBER OF THE
| COUNCIL was counted was Five hundred
ana fory-seVen.'..... .........'.'.'''''...''.''. %
THIRD COUNCIL DIsTRICT
That It appears such estimate and canvass. thi
| Tho whole number of votes given for the
ONCE OF MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL FOR
| THE THIRD COUNCIL DISTRICT
Two hundred and twenty-five thousand
six hundred and thirty eight. ........... 91B. o3
L az