Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1897-03-29

Arnold and +. o velteh defendants.
Vou ARE HEREBY REQUIRED TO Ap.
4 pear IN an action brought aga INST you
by tho above named plaintiff In the Distfic,
Court OF the third Judicial District OF tho
state OF Utah, and TO answer the complaint
filed therein within ten days to1clusiyo OF the
day of seryicel after the service on you OF
tins summons-if served within thIs county,
or II served out Of this county. but IN this dis.
iriet, within twenty dbys; Otherwise within
forty dayg-or judgment by default Will DO
taken against YOU according to the prayer OF
SAID complaint.
The said action Is brought to have Judgment
against the defendants for the sum OF s9islt
principal and interest thereon on at tile rGto
OF per cent per nnnum from and since June
70, 1896 less 81 paid august ~. 1875, s. pad
August "a, lev6. sL5O paid August 81, 1885, g
paid sepiember !. 1895, and 50 90 paid October
7. 1885. For $50 attorneys fees and costs OF
SUIT; alleged TO be due he plaintiffs from tho
defendant. Hugh n. Arnold. upon n certain
g gGISnssnty NOE. executed by the ssit
i SS,. The ,,. sum , Of sslsi, que in ono
8 per cent per annum; the same being duo
and wholly unpaid. save and except the suns
us above set forth, beng secured by mort
gage Of even dnie Herewith on the premisos
hereinafter described executed by the de.
PENDANT Hugh A. Arnold, and his wife susan
Arnold. to tho plaintiffs that these plaintiffs
are the lawful owners and holders OF SAID note
and mortgage; that by tho terma of said mort
gngc the ABOVE named defendant hugh a.
Arnold. agreed to pay reasonable attoruey'B
fee to have the usual decree OF this court for
the foreclosure Of ssld mortgage, and the sale
of sad promises. ndludging tic proceeds OF
SAID sale may be applied TO the payment of the
amount found due TO these PLAINTIFF. after tho
payment OF the costs Of the court, and eN-
ppnHcs of the sale; that defendants, and all
persons claiming under them, he barred and
foTeciosed of all claim or equity OF redemption
IN sad promises and every part thereof that
plaintiffs have judgment aud execution against
The saId defendant, hugh a. Arnold, for any
deficiency which may remain after applying
all Tho proceeds OF the sale OF SAID
promises properly applicable to tho
satisfaction OF said Judgment That
the plaintiff or any party to this suit may 10.
come purchaser at said sale that the sheriff
execute n decd to the purchaser, that the pur-
chaser be lot into possession Of said premises
and that the plaintiffs have such other and
further relief in the premises as to this court
may seem just and equitable.
SAID premises are described as follows Lotg
nfty-one (5l), ifty-twO (b2l IN Block three 80
IN Central Park subdivision OF Lots /, land 3
and ID IN Block Il. Ten Acre Hat "a" Big
Field survey. Same bel K situate In Salt Lake
City and county, Utah.
And you are hereby notified that II you fail
to appear and answer the said complaint
as above required, the said plaintiff will apply
Witness the Honorable Judges, AMI the seal
of the District Court OF the Third Ju.
dicial District, In and for the state OF
IsKALI Utah this Y2nd day OF January, in
the year OF our Lord one thousand
eight hundred and ninety-sev6n
DAVID e. DUNBAR Clerk,
by GRO. ID. LOOMS. Deputy Clerk.