The Wichita daily eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1890-1906, 1897-09-03
COURT TO CONVENE
SEPTEMBER TERM OF DISTRICT
COURT BEGINS TUESDAY.

Docket Has Been Completed and the Book
Arc Being Sent TO the Attorneys b.
Miss FIsk-There Are Fifteen Crimina
Gases, One Hundred and Seventy-Eig
Jury Cases and One Hundred and Tw.
Court Cases-An Exceptionally Heav,
Docket for the September Term-Somt
Important Cases to be Disposed of.
The September term Of the district
court will begin next Tuesday morning
At nine o'clock. The bar docket has been
completed and Miss Fisk was busy yes
terday mailing them 10 the attorneys.
The docket is exceptionally long, there
being fifteen criminal cases. 17S jury
cases and 102 court cases. The follow
Ing gentlemen have been chosen as jury
men:
J. E. Tandy, S. z. Dyal, S. W. Norris.
L. B. Hardesty, W. S. Garnet, A. Flagg,
John 7. Kelly, John A. Edwards, G.. NJ.
Howe. E. G. Robertson, C. B. Bennett,
J. W. Dresser, Wichita; R. Brown, Nor
ton township; V. Mayall, Grant town.
ship; Ed. Braden, L. H. Stafford, Rock
ford township; A. c. Grimsley, William
Stoner, Viola township; H. L. Newman.
Erie township; John H. Jacobs, Valley
Center township; S. Delong, Lincoln
township; C. NJ. Miles. Illinois township;
P Berk. Gypsum township; ]. T. Giles,
Park township.
STATE CASES.
State Of Kansas VS.. Charles Stearns
and Boone Fox; rape.
State Of Kansas VS.. J. Y. Cunningham;
murder.
State OF Kansas VS.. Barney O'Connor;
maintaining nuisance.
State Of Kansas VS.. Charles Maddox;
appeal
State OF Kansas VS.. N. Scott; assault.
State OF Kansas VS.. G. R. Estelle and
F. W. Fowler: appeal.
State Of Kansas VS.. Fred Harvel and
Clarence Buford. e. al; appeal.
State Of Kansas VS.. John MendenhaI
and Al latin; appeal
State Of Kansas VS.. August Schmidt ct
al: appeal.
State of Kansas VS.. ]. W. Griffith;
appeal.
State of Kansas VS.. Charles Hill; ap-
peal
State of Kansas We. n. c. Reeder; ap-
peal.
State Of Kansas VS.. Charles Smith;
larceny.
State OF Kansas vs.. Henry Perkins;
embezzlement
State Of Kansas We. Frank Lawrence;
larceny.
JURY CASES.
Citizens bank vs. Rufus Cone.
". L. Thomas VS.. Daniel Mckenzie
chicago Lumber company VS.. s. z.
Carman et al; foreclosure Of mech. lien.
j. I. Campbell VS.. Charles Schram and
John Martin Ell al; damage for CONVEX
sion.
Martin Hellar, Margaret Hellaret al
VS.. The Roman Catholic Church of the
Diocese Of Kansas ct al: damages
James Beard VS.. the Board OF County
Commissioners; appeal.
William Tudors VS.. the Board Of Coun-
II Commissioners: appeal.
Richard Harrison VS.. Fannie Moss and
Henry Wills; appeal
W. r Johnson vs. the Barber As
phat Paving company; suit on account
ing.
The Sunfower Town company vs. W. |
T. Hall and II. S. Hall: on note
Gaar. Scott & Co. VS. H. B. Smith. |
Jane Smith, ct al; foreclosure
James s Campbell and Luther Hanes |
vs. the City OF Wichita; damages.
The knight Investment company vs. |
W. B. Bailey; ejectment
Joseph c. Wilson, Aldace r. Walker.
Ell al vs.. ]. W. Hawn, B. 7. Churchward |
ct al; recovery Of money.
NJ. c. Cook Va the City Of Wichita;
appeal
Richard Pool VS. R Fulmer e. al; dam
ages.
A Gustinea nd 4. Cuisine doing bust
ness as A Cuisine & ca vs. E NJ Car
nahsn ct al; damages
GeTge NEEDLE vs. City Of Wichita: ap-
peal.
]. W. c. Mann,vs, the City Of Wichita:
appeal.
Jack Parry vs. City Of Wichita; ap-
peal
c. W. Page vs.. City Of Wichita; ap-
peal
Ed Edktns VS.. City OF Wichita: appeal.
Patrick Murphy VS. City OF Wichita;
appeal
L. LAUDER vs City OF Wichita: appeal.
T. Mulber vs.. City OF Wichita: appeal.
William Osburn VS.. City OF Wichita;
appeal.
peal
John L Windle VS.. City Of Wichita:
appeal.
Samuel Bolts Va. City o: Wichita;
appeal.
o. E. Kindred vs. City OF Wichita; ap-
peal
B. f. Kies VS.. n. P. Barnes e. al:
appeal
W. W. Ayers ct al VS.. L. C. Bird; ap-
peal.
Miss c. Carpenter VS.. ". S. Morris Ct
Al; foreclosure.
w A. Marshall VS. City OF Wichita;
Suit Cor wages
Mail II. Peck vs. T. H. Peck; fo-ec!o-
sure.
Ella VI Aldrlch vs.. B. R. Royse ct al;
Appeal.
w. H. Woffenden vs. the Board OF
~SN-AN' NSiis-iAes4OucSIS, Sull lOT money |
Isaac Cronk VS.. S. s. Hazard; dam
ages.
First National Bank OF Newton VS..
Francis L. Briggs; on note.
T. B. Wall and C. H. Broks VS.. John
NJ Corn 81 al; recovery IF money.
kfFllkf s SIs WITH ~s : sofss' la Sss