Daily capital journal. (Salem, Or.) 1896-1899, 1897-03-16
COURTS,
JOy-BOttger Case on Trial
Department No. z n Ssssion--The
Supreme Court.

Geo. IT.. Burnett sitting as a court
and We ask that The trial d thi
cause may be changed 70 some Othe
court, ard re further say. that We an
perfectly willing 70 try the same Be
fore any circuit judge 10 Oregon eK-
cept said Geo Fl Burnett" D'Arcy
& Richardson, Mr.. yOry's attorneys.
vigorously oppo-ed this. and the de-
PENDANTS motion was OveTruled By the
judge. The trial vas then opened
james BOttger being the first witness.
When court adjourned last evening.
Nr. BOttger was stfll on toe stand.
The JOY BOttger case was resumed
this morning before Judge Burnett
and a number u other additional
witnesses examined. II is quite likely
TIE case will be concluded at a lac
hour this afternoon when the respect
i've cOUnsels Will make their closinz
arguments.
N DEPARTAEgM So2.
Judge ii. II. Hewitt c1nYeped De-
partment No 2 Of the Marion county
circuit court at 9 N. today and
the following entries we're made al
the morning session.
NJ. L. Adams, insolyent, vs.. J.. W.
Mckinney, assignee, assignment,
order continuing cause set aside and
cause entered To docket. Sale con-
hrmed and cause continued.
a. +. La ROGUE vs.. j. j. DOzler.
Injunction, demurrer sustained.
f. W. Cops vs. A. f. La ROGUE
ct al, suit on bond, upon filing the
findings, plaintiff asked leave to
amend his reply - striking cut the
words land at I, : me the bond ia
question ia the sT't was prepared
and executed the lid Manning was
the attorney for the defendant La
ROcque," so as to make 1t conform 10
the facts which was granted, where
upon decree was rendered on the
findings.
II. p. McNary receiver, vs. 6. W.
Williams ct al, equity, dismissed as
TO Chas. II. Dodd & Co, and decree on
pleadings as to other.
II. p. McNary, receiver, VS.. VIM.
England, ct AL, equity, decree on
Headings. The amount claimed by
county as taxes TO be paid into court
u await the further order Of the
court. Motion and demurrer contil-
ued.
James McCourt VS.. johns ct al.
on findings.
NOTES.
Il. II. Hibbard, l.. Ames, and James
have been appointed appraisers
Of the estate Of Nicholas Lichty de
ceased, who left property TO the prob
able value Of 81, leo.
SUPREME COURT.
There was a large aniolnt OF bust.
ness before the supreme court.
Attorneys present were E. 3. Wal.
'On and Judge Smith OF Portland, A.
IL. Irvine Of McMinnville, and j.. F.
Hall OF Marshield.
Oregon Pottery Co., respondent VS..
?. Kern appellant, ordered that re-
.ponde1t have 10 days additional time
o file a petition for rehearing.
Peter Conrad ct al respondent VS..
Pacific Packing Company ct al ap-
.'ellants, argued and submitted on
TO bar respondent from filing
'rlef the time for so doing having ex-
'ired and respondent being Ia default.
A. t.. Ambrose appellant VS.. b.
huntington respondent ordered on
notion that appellant have until F,
lay l, 1897 TO serve and hle his brief.
ID. X. Warren ct al appellant VS. j..
!. DE Force ct al res pondent ordered !
n stipulation that respondents have
NTH April !, 1897 TO serve and file |
heir brief and that appellant have 60 1
avs thereafter to serve and file a re- I
IL brief. 4
- - HNutAah iScpuhutuAs vs.. w. !
|. S, Hyde submitted on motion TO I
caused for bearing. I
Clatsop Mnl Co., respondent, VS. q
OF Astoria ct al. appellants or I
cred on stipulation that decree be .
lodihed as stipul ted. 4
State OF Oregon respondent, VS.. I
.ndrew Robinsor appellant appeal /
'om Marion county argued and sui 1
lifted G. NJ. Idleman and s. l.. Hay {
en attorneys for respondent G. G. J
ingham and a. II. Irvine attorneys
n appellants. '
TUESDAYS DECISION. I
The0 III. Loclie, respondent VS.. Louis a
icolin et al, appellant, appeal +,
Multnomah county, Judgment :
irmed opinion, Moore. c. ]. John J. :
snnings, respondent, vs.. Anna p. !
ardner ct al. appellant appeal from c