The herald., 1897-07-27

respectfully recommend that 1t be au-
thorized to treat with the water COM
pany or its representatives in the mat
ter to the fullest extent, leaving the final
approval of its action to your honorable
body.
SUPPLY COMMITTEE
Your supply committee, to whom has
been presented. acquisitions from the
two departments of the city police JUS
tees courts, asking permission to pur-
chase for each department metal safe
or box for the better security of valua-
BILE papers and the temporary deposit of
| cash, respectfully report recommending
| that such provision be made and that
the city clerk be instructed to advertise
for bids for said safes, according to the
details to be furnished by the police JUS
tees and approved by this committee.
A RESOLUTION
Councilman Hutchinson offered the fol-
lowing resolution, which was adopted
| unanimously:
| Whereas, City Engineer Dockweiler
has stated in his recent report on the
value of the City Water company that
the greater part of that excellent report
|
Mr.. Ernest Abs-Hagan; therefore,
Resolved, That the sincere thanks OF
this council are due to Mr.. Ernest Abs
Hagan for the untiring industry pa
rient watchfulness, unf1inching fidelity
and consummate skill with which he
performed the arduous ta~K of making
the estimates of the plant of the City
Water company"
1
| The following proposals were received
opened, examined and publicly declared.
To improve Macy street from Date to
| Howard streets: Chas. Stansbury pro-
posed Grading and crawling, 70 cents
per lineal foot; curb. 20 cents per lineal
foot; sidewalk, 10 cents per square foot
sewer, complete, 81 cents per lineal foot
crosswalks, IS cents per lineal foot.
c. l.. McCombs proposed: grading and
crawling, SLIP per lineal foot; curb, 20
cents per lineal foot; sidewalk, 10 cents
per square foot; cutters, 10 cents per
lineal foot; sewer, $1.43 per lineal foot;
crosswalks 81 per lineal foot
R. H. McCray proposed; Grading and
crawling 81 cents per l.neal foot; curb
30 cents per lineal foot; sidewalk, 91s
cents per square foot; sewer, $1.40 per
lneal foot; crosswalks, SIS cents per lin
aal foot.
! J. P. Mccormick proposed: GRADING
! and crawling, 80 cents per lineal foot
curb, 30 cents per lineal foot; sidewalk
w cents per square foot; sewer, 81 pei
| meal foot: crosswalks so cents per lin
sal foot.
L. Brodie proposed: Grading and
graveling, 70 cents per lineal foot; curb
| 2Sss cents per ineal FOOT cutters, IA
cents per lireal foot; sidewalk. 7-1O
cents per square foot; sewer, 1.27 per
| lineal foot; crosswalks, So cents per lin
| cal foot
S. B. Clayton proposed: Grading and
crawling, $1.15 per lineal foot; curb, 2s
cents per lineal foot; sidewalk 91a cents
per square foot sewer, 80 cents per lin
cal foot; crosswalks, so cents per Inca
foot
M. Zuretti proposed: Grading and
crawling, $1.05 per lineal foot; side
walk. 11h cents per square foot; sewer.
81 16 per lineal foot; crosswalks, So cents
per lineal foot.
French & Reed proposed: Grading and
crawling. "a cents, per lineal foot; curb.
271s cents per lineal foot; cutters, 10
cents per lineal foot sidewalk, cents
ser square foot; sewer $1.25 per lineal
foot; crcsswallls, 95 cents per lineal foot
A. B. Hogan proposed: Grading and
crawling, SIS cents per r:neal foot; curb
291s cents per lineal foot cutters, u
cents per lineal foot; sidewalk, 9a cents
per square foot; sewer, 81 cents per lineal
foot; crosswalks, 95 cents per lineal foot
Referred to board of public works
Date streets: Chas. Stansbury pro
posed: Grading and graveling, SO cents
per lneal foot curb, go cents per lineal
foot; cutters, - cents per lineal foot;
sidewalk. 91a cents per square foot;
crosswalks. IS cents per lineal foot
French & Reed proposed: Grading
and crawling. SO cents per lineal foot
curb 2S cents per lineal foot; cutters, ~
cents per lineal foot; sidewalk, 9 cents
per square foot; crosswalks 50 cents per
|lineal foot.
]. P. Mccormick proposed: Grading
and gravel:ng, 80 cents per lneal foot !;
curb, % cents per lineal foot; sidewalk,
10 cents per square foot; crosswalks, 80
cents per lineal foot.
M. Zuretti proposed: Grading and
crawling, $1.10 per lineal foot; curb rs
cents per lineal FOOT cutters, cents
per lineal foot; sidewalk, u cents per
square foot; crosswalks, IS cents per
lineal foot.
A. b. Hogan proposed: Grading and
graveling, SIS cents per lineal foot curb.
291s cents per lineal foot; cutters, ~
cents per lineal foot; sidewalk, 91a cents
per square foot; crosswalks, 95 cents
per lineal foot
r. H. McCray proposed: Grading and
crawling, 95 cents per lineal FOOT curb.
30 cents per lineal foot; cutters, 16 cents
per lineal foot; sidewalk, 91s cents per
square foot; crosswalks, 80 cents per
lineal foot.
l.. Brodie proposed: Grading and grav-
cling, rs cents per lineal foot; curb, 30
cents per lineal foot; cutters. 131s cents
per lineal foot; sidewalk s ITO cents per
square foot; sewer, $1.26 per lineal foot;
crosswalks, 80 cents per lineal foot.
P. j. Richmon proposed: Grading and
graveling, SO cents per lineal foot; curb.
% cents per lineal foot; cutters, 10 cents
per lineal foot; sidewalk, 9 cents per
square foot sewer, 83 cents per lineal
foot; crosswalks. 80 cents per lineal foot
Same bid covers improvement of Macy
street from Date to Howard streets.
T 49,.