Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1897-05-06

early In the year 1887, Fhe waa tolu
that her husband was IN Omaha bHt
bcinK { formed that he WINS In SAT-
LAKE. City, and having heard that he
wss sick, enc began to search for him,
ln order - 6ke care OF nifn.and found
aim IN piucs where she had to get a
policeman 10 30 with her. Sac crowded
into the place, although woman In
O nightrObe bl3oSei her way, an d
iounu Mr.. Gfitfin In bed,
notwithstanding the woman's
denial OF his being ut tho place. She
sRya the fret things lie said to her wss,
"Y u cannot arrest me tonighi;" that
fhs Ieulipd, 81 do not want u arrest
500, want to take you home" and
ssid to him IL nearly kilIeI her
10 find him there with prostitutes;
she installed herself in tht
room and ordered two women OF
shsmeIoss appearance who were there
to leave the place, and the women,
after locking up the writing desk, went
into the adjoining room and locked
Themselves In. She remained all night
waiting upon her husband and trying
TO induce him to 50 home anI leave
his degraded associations; but he
claimed to be very slck. Next morn
log she told her husband that she
would 20 and get proper nurse for
him, and did 80. The next day her
hp1Oand was moved to the
hospital; Mrs. CIR lila afterwards
sent tue nurse H. the hospi.
tai to find out her husbands con l.
ton. The pereon whom she sent was
not permitted to see hun, being tolu
that even his wife could not be admit
ted. Then she went herself, going to
his room without being ANNOUNCED,
and when she came into Vt she lounu
the Birkman woman sitting at the
head OF his bed converting with him;
that thnreupon the Blfkman
woma1 fed from the room anu
building, and thereupon plain
til cursed her, defendant, In
ss to disturb the hospital. She was
compelled to 90 away, AMI since that
time has seen very little OF the plain
tn.
Mrs.. Griffin alleges that she is en-
titled to the sole care amt custody,
education and control OF their minor
child. but is willing that he have the
privilege OF visiting 1t. She Gays he Is
In receipt OF large ipcome, not less
than Elk thousand per year, and she
wants temporary siimODy, alto the
use OF the home In which she is Ieeid-
ing, and permanent alimony as the
court may consider just.
Young & Moyle, anu Moyle u ne &
COstigan are attorneys Tor Mrs. Gril-
fin.
1t lie said by parties concerned and
in q position 10 know, that when the
Gaze comes on Tor hearing there will be
evidence duplicating one or more city
councillors in an nnsavory matter.
FIGHT OVER THE CHILD.
Defendant further alleges that since
said suit Of plaintiff was filed, and in
deed since the foregoing portion OF
the answer and crOse.compiRint was
prepared, she has obtai ned possession
OF her boy whom che now has under
her control. That said Possession OF
her child was obtained under the fol-
lowing circumstances: That she re-
paired to the school wher. her 50 d
child had been going. took hold If
him with Intention to take him with
her to her home, when an agent WIN
WAS employed by the plaintiff for that
purpose, struck defendant a iorceable
blow with his clenched fist vicious.
ly in the face, and knocked
her down, anu brutality followed
up with two other blows, blacI-
ing her eyes and cutting her nose,
ana almost breaking 1t, injuring ana
damaging defendant. And that she
Ia informed and believes that sail
agent ana servant OF the said plaintiff
was instructed so to treat tue said de.
iendaDt, In case that she sought to
obtain possession OF her said child.
That she is 10 constant bodily fear OF a
repetition OF said assault, either by
plaintiff or some OF his agents or SER
wants acting under his Instructions.
And plant Il has large number OF
teams and way ms occupied aud used
as sprinkling plant, AS 1t 10 50 called,
worth about 100000; and that as dt-
lendant is informed anu believes, saiu
plaintiff is trying TO sell the same and
other property owned by him, and as
she ia in ormed and believes said
plaintiff will sell anu convert and dis.
pose OF the means derived thereirom
unless restrained by this court, OF
otherwise get the same outside the
jurisiiction thereof.
Defendant further alleges that she lie
and has been the lawful pUssessor OF
the homestead occupied by himself
and CHILD for the lsst seven or eight
years; that said property belongs to
said plaintiff, but defendant has oeen
in possession thereof ever since the
abandonment OF her by plaintiff. The
great bulk of said property, anu prsc-
tically the whole of IL, has been earned
anu accumulated since they have be.
come husband aud wife.
Wherefore defendant demands judy
ment: That The bonds OF mstrimoGy
now existing between the de.