The Wichita daily eagle., 1897-07-23


cry county; dismissed for failure to
comply with rule 9.
SOD. First National Bank of Garnett,
plaintiff in error, VS.. J. W. Bronston,
defendant in error; eror from And
ersor county; motion to dismiss sus-
1ained, and case ordered dismissed.
I6. ]. w. Goodin and r. T. Darby, plain
tiffs in error, vs. T. L. Newcomb, a.
assignee Of 4. E. Geyer, defendant
in error; error from Franklin coun-
ty; judgment Of district court is af-
frmed.
156. John w. DeFord, plaintiff in error,
VS.. Gilbert IL. Shepard, defendant in
error; error from Franklin county
judgment If district court is affirm
ed
152. F.. E. Crane, plaintiff in error, VS..
c. S. Cox and c. W. Goodin, de-
PENDANTS in error; error from Frank
lin county; judgment Of district
court is affirmed.
17S. Josephus Morris, ct al, plaintiff in
error, VS.. W. F. Lennon and c. NJ.
Sharte.. defendants in error; error
from Chautauqu county; judgment
ulSlrlCI court Is reversed.
22S. S. G. W. Stevens, plaintiff in error,
VS.. The Board Of County Commits
sioners of Miami County, Kansas;
error from Miami county; judgment
district court is reversed.
16S. The Kansas City, Fort Scott and
Memphis Railroad company, plain
tiffs in error, VS.. James Campbell,
administrator Of the estate of Chas.
z. Campbell, deceased. defendant in
error; error from Crawford Co.; at-
firmed.
1874. c. G. Metzler, plaintiff in error, vs
c. c. WenZel, The Board of County
Commissioners of Cherokee Coun-
ty, et al, defendants in error; error
from Cherokee county; judgment dis
trict court is affirmed.
162. The Woodson National Bank, plain
tiff in error. VS.. P. II. Moore, ct al,
defendants in error; error from
Woodson county; judgment affirm
ed
172. The Missouri Pacific Railroad COM
pany, plaintiffs in error, VS.. Edward
Eugene Clark, by mis- father and
next friend. w. II. Clark, defendant
in error; error from Allen county;
judgment district court affirmed
15S. J. F. McFarren, plaintiff in error,
vs.. o. G. Athey. defendant in error;
error from Cherokee county; the
case is affirmed.
$50. City Trust Company, plaintiff in er-
ror. vs. George W. Tilton, County
Clerk Of Labette county, ct al, de-
bette count; judgment district court
is affirmed.
40. The National Bank Of Paola. plain
tiff in error, VS.. D. o. Banta and
Z. L. Moore, defendants in error;
error from Miami county; the case
is affirmed.
166. The ST. Louis and San Francisco
Railway company, plaintiff in error,
VS.. Miles Toomey, defendant in er-
ror; error from Crawford county:
affirmed.
23o. Betty Donnell. plaintiff in error, vs.
Samuel Reece and G.. W. Catzung.
defendants in error. This is an ap-
plication for an order of revivor in !
the name Of Mary Catzung. execu- |
trix Of estate OF G. W. Catzung. de- |
ceased. The order is granted by !
consent OF the parties.
WESTERN DIVISION.
40. st. Louis and San Francisco Rail- /
way company. Plaintiff in error. We.
F.. F. Blakely, defendant in error; |
error from Rice county; judgment Of |
district court is reversed.
IL. George W. Noble, plaintiff in error. |
VS.. Nathan Harter, defendant in er-
ror: error from Stafford county; af- |
firmed.
~. William Dobson. plaintiff in error.
vs.. c. Z. Wrightman. The Bank OF |
Tribune. and the State OF Kansas. /
defendants in error: ero- from Gree I
ley county; judgment Of distric, /
cour; is reversed.
lao. The Comscock Castle Stove compa-
ny. plaiRdff in error. VS.. :. Galland. |
defendant in error; ero- from Ford .
county; affirmed
-. The C1mstock Castle Stove conpa-
ny. plaintiff in e..or. vs.. s Galland. |
defendants IN erro: judgment of dis 1
defendant in error; eror from Ford |
county: affirmed.
10. Simpson ". Day. plaintiff in error
". The FRS; National Bank Of Gar
den City. Kansas. a corporation. de-
fendant in error: error from Finney
county: affirmed.
%. A,chison. Topeka and Santa Fe r
r. Co, plaintiff in error. ". p. 4.
Pearson. defendant; in errcr: error
from Edwards county; judgment os
cou-, i reversed.
ii5. W. 3. Canine and Louisa c. Ca
nine. Plaintiffs in e-or. vs.. George
w. Finnup, defendant in error: er-
ror from Finney county: petition for
re-hesring is denied. There is also
= motion asking ;his cour; - direct
The clerk ot the court Of appeals o.
ne Western division. OF the South
ern department. 20 issue mandate in
said cause. This motion Is grant
ei.
CENTRAL DIVISION.
DSi- The Keystone Iron Works company.
plaintiff in error. VS.. Alma Wiikie.
defendant in error; ero- from Butler
county judgmen; is affirmed.
81. Wm. Rexroad. Administrator OF he
estate ot joan Rexroad. Gscea ased.