The Wichita daily eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1890-1906, 1897-09-03


The Fourth National Bank VS.. Lou
Roser ct al: quit title.
The knight Investment company v
| S. w. Cooper, admir- ct al; foreclosure.
A H. Vishburgh VS.. Jesse Campbell
ct a.; foreclosure.
J. E. Wiggleewor;h vs. George G
| Clark; suit for an accounting.
Emma F. Mcbride vs.. the Saving
! bank of Wichita; suit on contract.
The Johnston & Larimer Dry Good
company VS.. the Missouri Pacific Rail
way company; replevin.
The New England Mutual Life Insur
ance company VS.. John Stewart ct al
damages.
Lottie NJ. Van Wyck We. Carl Gors e
a.; foreclosure.
J. A. Campbell John c. McNaghten
E. E. Wilson and W. B. Johnson, part
ners as Wilson & johnson VS.. A. Z
Lawrence, ct a.; on account.
Barbara A. McCalla vs.. E. r. Powell
appeal.
w. F. Bennett VS.. John OMealey e
al; recovery Of property.
S. J. Mahan and L. NJ. Mahan, part
ners as the Mahan Supply company VS.
j. D. Macy, constable; repievin.
E.R. Powell VS.. Bruce II. Priddy
ejectment.
f. r. Powell VS.. Carrie Goodwin
ejectment.
E. R. Powell VS.. John c. Bryan ct al
ejectment.
Deering Harvester company VS.. Claude
W. Aldrich; attachment.
Lizzie Sumption VS.. Phoenix Mutual
Life Insurance company ct al; recovery
Of money.
The Choctaw, Oklahoma and Gull
Railway company VS.. the Kansas Com
mission company; recovery OF money
The Anglo-American Land Mortgage
and Agency company, limited, VS.. Lom-
bard Investment company; recovery OF
money.
The Redemption and Investment CON-
pany VS. the Lombard Investment COM
pany; recovery OF money.
Adam Deihlman and Rosa Deihiman
vs. L. w. Clapp ct al; appeal.
Knowlton Danderine company vs. Geo.
". Van Werden; appeal.
s. L. Conklin VS.. Maria A Russell ct
al; foreclosure.
The Pacific Elevator company w. Jas.
w. Whitbeck ct al; stockholders liabil-
ity.
In the matter Of the appeal Of Bell
Sloss from the decision Of the probate
court in the matter of the estate OF Abb
cenia Sullard, deceased: appeal.
Phoebe Paxson VS.. Ada D. Whitmore
ct al; foreclosure.
The Hinsdale Savings Bank vs.: Chas
E. Joslin; attachment.
Edward Joslin VS.. the Citizens Bank
Of Wichita: suit on note.
The Belknap Savings Bank We. Jacob
Helvic ct al: foreclosure.
Mary Greenwood VS.. Cicero G. Latty
ct al; foreclosure.
Citizens Bank OF Sedgwich VS.. Charles
E. Chrismore ct al; foreclosure.
Dwight D. McEwen and Frank E. Es-
sex, doing business as the Standard
Grain company, VS.. H. c. Hodges: ap-
peal.
The Western National Bank Of New
York VS.. Abbie B. McNeal; attachment.
The Singer Manufacturing company VS.
John w. Herford and H. l. Gordon; re-
covery of money.
L. C. Tatgenhorst VS.. Lena Pehl; at
tachment
Cyrus A. Leland. receiver. vs.. o. q.
suit on note.
Cyrus A. Leland, receiver. We. John 7.
Kelley and r. V. Kelley; suit on note.
Cyrus A. Leland, receiver, VS. A. T.
ct al; suit on note.
Cyrus A Leland, receiver. VS.. George
". Bristow; suit on note.
Cyrus A. Leland. receiver. VS.. John D.
Davis; suit on note.
Amy Stone and Elizabeth A. Stone vs.
Nary E. Terrell ct al; foreclosure Of lien.
B. F. Mclean VS. VIM. Knight. trustee,
t al; foreclosure OF lien.
Helen Huber and Lizzie S. Cromwell
IS. Chas. C. Davis e. all foreclosure.
John B. Grommes and - Ulrick, part
lers as Ulrick & Grommes VS.. John Clay
on and Chas. Fleeman; appeal
The Arkansas and Missouri Yellow
Pine company VS.. Walter NJ. Pond ct al;
appeal.
Ohm c. Vogle. doing business under the
lrm name OF the Vogle Box company;
ppeal.
W. n. Ewing as receiver vs.. George e.
Rogers; appeal
John n. Roach vs.. Elias T. Riley ct al;
oreclosure.
Lydia Bartholomew VS.. Tho Wichita
Electric Railway and Light company;
amages.
The Mutual BENEFIT Insurance com
any VS.. David A. Mitchell ct a.: fore
losure.
The Hartford Western Land company
5. Henry Muntz ct al; appeal.
Alice S. Mccullough VS. Henry Shu-
1an: foreclosure.
The California Wine association VS., T.
T. Mahan and ]. p. Mahan, partners as
iahan Bros: recovery OF money.
L. NJ. McCrocklln va. 1. 3. Holdy; re-
levin.
Sarah J. Thompson vs. Lucy Parham
nj George R. Parham; attachment.
The North American Trus. company
5. Charles H. Miller and Lizzie Miller:
Paul Neumann vs.. Mrs. Clara thinner
IAN: suit on account.
Ella Hoover VS.. S. II. Hoover: recovery
money.
II. c. Dunbar VS.. J. D. Botkin ct al; !
uit on note.
John c. Burweu vs.. Minnie Oet e. al: |
oreclosure.
The Bertram and Heating company VS.. |
Y. H. Rsuch; appeal.
Stephen A. Hoyt VS. AKRON NJ Patton |
al, foreclosure.
Fred McCIain and Mamie c. NcLa.n |