The Weiser signal. [volume] (Weiser, Idaho) 1890-1904, 1897-12-30
THE WEISER SIGNAL.
THURSDAY. DECEMBER 80, 1897.
SIGNAL ENDORSED.

AZ hNDonoHD'
In 9antamhar q 1907 tho qyarAY
- ~ ooieorial comment on certain
dooislons Of the Rnnremo conrt .a;d
1ut inc great cost 70 matters OF Stale
ma snairs puDhc 10 not TO overbaance
ne uei,gnt OF legal iuminAres at an op..
tschnicslity. The court has u cited The he
gro91nd. Tor is decision but yet we are
IL going behind The enrolled biz 10 work
S 81 70 public interests i is true
a u certain defined manner. and nd also also
~ saat the journal, in the case Of the
I - Is fsil. But AZ not tbc sisnst"rr r' Of
e:sr q she Mouse and the presl-
t u 9'e senate just - good authority
49, y Vas pAs,ed correctlyl The jour
y. may % guiIty OF omission. There is
ssste when tne speaker and the presi-
v Suns Hnnounce tnelr insenuon 70 sign
o.n .uu me opportunity given OF all OPP
Poeeno 70 t*Ke advantage OF irreRulari-
~. Pa..hse. ANY opening would then
sskon advantage OF by the opponents
Arising wou certainly have some show
ing ~ tho journal. Where the propriety
o. sne signatures being attached, nfter
sue announcements does not appear to
nAve oehn oneliengeu' " seems to us the
oouf, nnouln nave no power to go furth-
tne unon"iicnged signatures are bet
81 evidence OF regularity than any omls-
~" "a she JOURNAL u OF irreguiarlty.
IL Il 40 seldom the SroNAr il 70.
Oo8nsHeu ny inc BOISE Statesman,
leading daily of Idaho that of coursa
vuE oyo was quickly caught Dy the
8tateousnn editorial of MONDAY morn.
~ 80
NH Ooocmuer ~, 1881, In winch 1t
aavs:
rom me stnnopo'nt OF me layman,
tnc oeois'oh 10 the medical Dill case FUR
nisneo strong argument against contln-
uauon OF the rule OF the court. The fact
snst y ma oeeh demonstrated that that
oecislon WAS founded upon an error In the
journal furnishes strong proof OF the cor
rectncss o. tne contention That y is safer
~ 20 20 oehino the enrolled Dill. From
tne ~ mani position the point Is one
hAs snouiu " urged on every proper oc-
ss
1ne position OF the court mas been that
.osNuE verify must 90 imputed 10 the
1outuxiA but mere II case 10 which the
souII M oeen ieo 'nto plumber oy the
JSuInAi. !. eau 20 proved absolutely that
ne iscs wn'oh tue Journal processes to
.noW are not iScts AZ all. ms TO the
,emsu minu' opens up Inc entire sub
COTTtCl0e8y
c.n oe Known mat they oristle WIN err
TOT. there are cases 10 which the min
we reso ana approved were not the same
snes appear In the recorcs' The minutes
70 me senate were kept on slips. These
Wco so~u A9u tue approval OF the senate
~ tounoeu upon that reading; but In
W~ instances errors IN transcrioing
.."sc Nne Journn' snow very diHerent re-
s'u n mhere are other errors OF every
k'no. Iney passed through unnoticed
oe. tney STAND there rs the records OF
Irs W. oone.
NOV. now muoh less likely II Is that
sne s'eussure OF tne presiding oincer de-
cIanns smAs Dill mas passed will be In
..,.n me memo ers follow measure
~ w h care, .ney know whether or not there
oeas,isution and rules. When the pre-.
.c"n c o" rs comes .e. 70 sign o'i he an
70 attach his signature to il. If i: has
Dre.s.l sSS phs r reg, h some one will
OF course il is possible for an irresularity
md shs sne nr.en n,', 81 AL the members
IA Which will you trust, the members.
y" % s"sc. sFs's''o" according to
slsrks who may be Incompetent care careless 81