Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1897-05-11

The state of Utah tends greeting 70 Hugh A.
Arnold and ;. o Veitch defendants.
VoU ARE HEREBY REQUIRED 10 AP.
II pear IN nm action brought against you
by the above named plaintiff In the District
Court OF the Third Judicial District OF tue
sia!e o. Utah, and to answer the complaint
nlcu thurein within ten days exclusive OF the
DAY of servicel after tho service on you OF
this eummons--if served within this county
or u served out OF this county. but IN this DIS
trict, WI hin twenty dAJs; Otherwise within
forty days-or judgment by default Will De
tAksn nga INST you. according to the prayer OF
said complaint.
1he said action is brought to have Judgment
against the defendant for the sum of s2is.li
principal aud interest thereon on at The rate
OF per cent per annum from and since June
20 1925. lcss 81 paid august n, 1893, $ paid
August q. 1876. $3.50 paid August 81. 1870, So
I, lh9a For $50 attorneys fees and costs OF
sun alleged TO be due he plaintiffs from the
defendant, Hugh A Arnold; upon 2 certain
efenssn n %Inod executes so thy By s sa
q, s the ,,. sum ' Of, 9, s.;siI, cue IN on:
per cent per annum; the same bein & due
and wholly unpaid, save and except the sums
as above SCI forth, being secured by u mort
gage Of ever date herewith on She premises
hereinafter described, executed by the de.
fondsnt Hugh a Arnold. and his wife susan
Arnold, 10 tie plaintiffs, that these plaintiffs
and IN ortgnge that by tho terms OF said mort
gage the above named defendant Hugh A.
AihOius ntIttu 70 puy y TtNtOnhbit
fee; 10 have tho usual decree OF this court for
the foreclosure of ssid mortgage. and the 2 ale
of said premises, Adiudging the proceeds OF
eaid sale may DO applied TO the payment OF tho
amount found duoVo these plaintiffs. after the
payment OF the COSTS of the Court and TX.
penscs Of the sale, that defendants. and all
persons claiming cnder them, 10 barred and
ioreoiosed of all claim or equity Of rodemp ton
In SAID premises, and every part thereof; that
PLAINTIFF have Judgment aud execution aRninN
the eald defendant hugh a. Arnold, for any
deficiency which may remain after applying
all he proceeds OF the sale of said
premises properly applicable to the
satsfaction OF said Judgment That
The plaintiff or any party to this suit may be.
come purchaser AZ said sale that the sheriff
execute deed to the purchaser; that the pur-
chaser be lot into possession Of said premises
on production of the sheriif's deed therefor;
and that the plaintiffs have such other and
further relief in The premises as to this court
may seem Just and equitable.
SAID premises are described as follows; Lots
nfty-one (bl), hfty. two t62l IN Block three tal
In Central Pirk subdivision of Lots ], 2und5
and II IN Block a, Ten Acre Plat "a" Big
Field survey. Same beirg situate in eAlt Lake
City and county, Utah.
And you are hereby notified that II you fail
to appear and answer the said complaint
rs above required. the said plaintiff will apply
Witness the Honorable Judges. and the seal
OF tho District Court of the Third Jul
ticial District, in and for the state OF
IsEALl Utah, tins 2?nd day of January, In
the year of our Lord one thousand
eight hundred and ninety.sev6n.
DAVID &. DusR u, Clerk,
BY GEO ID. LOOMS. Deputy Clerk.