The herald., 1897-03-02
THAT POOL Is A NUISANCE AND DISGRACE.

I horrible place. and the people certain
| ly should have some relief.
| Councilman Mathuss said that the
place was the worst nuisance he had in
| his ward, and he wanted it abated. 1t
had caused him more trouble than any
! thing else since he had taken office, and
! he wanted 1t fixed up. II there is no
other way to get at the matter. he would
move that the matter be declared
nuisance. and the health department
| ordered to abate 1t by some means at
! once.
Health Of1cen Powers said that the
place was one of the worst nuisances in
the city. and public disgrace He
thought that something should be done,
| but as 1t was in the street, the health
department could do nothing.
Councilman Mathuss thought that 1t
| might be possible to get thei property
! owners together and arrive at an under
standing, and asked Mr.. Riley II he
thought this could be done.
Mr.. Riley thought that It could. AS for
himself. he thought 1t would be good
plan to allow contractors to dump dirt
in the street and fill 1t up. This could
be done without expense to the city. He
had 5000 yards of gravel, and he would
give the city enough to fix up the street
II they would pay for spreading It,
After some further desultory talk, the
matter was dropped without any Off
cial action being taken, beyond sus-
tanning the street superintendent in
ordering the dirt removed from the
sidewalk.
BIDS OPENED.
The following bids were opened, de-
clared and referred to the proper COM
mittees:
To improve McCHntock avenue from
Olin street to the south boundary line of
the city-M. S. Cummings proposed:
Grading and graveling. Ssc per lineal
foot; curb. 3Sc per lineal foot; sidewalk,
111ac per square foot; crosswalks, N15
per nneal foot.
Stansbury & Moore proposed: Grad
ing and graveling, soc per lineal foot;
curb, 30c per lineal foot; sidewalk 10c
per square foot; crosswalks, 81 per lin
cal foot.
w. G. Huey proposed: Grading and
graveling, TIC per lineal foot; curb, &c
per lineal foot; sidewalk, 91sc per square
foot; crosswalks, zoe per lineal foot.
F. Grant proposed: Grading and
graveling, 60c per lineal FOOT curb, SOC
per lineal foot; sidewalk. SAC per square
foot; crosswalks, 81 per lineal foot.
Gray Bros. & Ward proposed: Grad
ing and graveling. SOC per lineal foot;
curb, SAC per lineal foot; sidewalk. 121sc
per square foot; crosswalks, s0c per
lineal foot
S. McCray proposed: Grading and
graveling. SAC per lineal foot; curb. soc
per lineal foot; sidewalk 91ac per square
foot; crosswalks, SSc per lineal foot.
c. W. Shafer proposed: Grading and
graveling. 50c per lineal foot; curb, S0c
per lineal foot; sidewalk, lie per square
foot; crosswalks, 81 per lineal foot.
L. Brodie proposed: Grading and
graveling, s1.12 per lineal foot; curb, Sic
per lineal foot; cutters. 15c per lineal
FOOT sidewalk, 10 3-Sc per square foot;
crosswalks, s1.1O per lineal foot.
P. ]. Richmond proposed: Grading
and graveiing, 4oc per lineal foot; curb.
291sc per lineal foot; sidewalk, 10 3-Sc
per square foot; crosswalks, 81 per lin
cal foot.
]. 8. Haigler proposed: Grading and
graveling. 66c per lineal foot; curb, 291ac
per lineal foot; sidewalk, 9hc per square
foot; crosswalks, 94c per lineal foot.
Newlin & McCombs proposed: Grad
ing and graveling. 5sc per lineal foot;
curb, 29c per lineal foot; sidewalk, exc
per square foot; crosswalks, zoe per lin
cal foot.
A. J. Tilden proposed: Grading and
graveling, 631sc per lineal foot curb,
zoe per Hneal foot; sidewalk 10c per
square foot; crosswalks, 90c per lineal
foot.
Chas. D. Harmon proposed: Grading
and graveling. 64c per lineal foot: curb.
29c per lineal foot: sidewalk. 10c per
square foot; crosswalks. 90c per lineal
foot.
Referred to the board of public works
To improve Thirty-s sixth street from
Hough to Vermont avenues-Chas. j.
Harmon proposed: Grading and gravel
Ing, S5c per lineal foot; curb. 29c per
lineal foot; sidewalk, 10c per square
foot; crosswaiks, s5c per lineal foot
A. j. Tilden proposed: Grading and
graveling, 90c per lineal foot; curb, Soc
per lineal foot sidewalk 10c per square
foot; crosswalks, 81 per lineal foot
j. S. Haigler proposed: Grading and
graveling, SAC per lineal foot: curb
2915c per lineal foot; sidewalk, 91kc per
square foot; crosswalks (stone), 94c per
lineal foot
P. ]. Richmon proposed Grading and
graveling, 53c per lineal foot; curb 29i6c |
per lineal foot; sidewalk, 107sci per
square foot; crosswalks, 90c per lineai
foot.
L. Brodie proposed: Grading and
graveling, s1.04 per lineal foot: curb,
30asc per lineal foot; gutter. 15c per
lineal foot; sidewalk. 1880 per square
foot; crosswalks, s1.1O per lineal foot.
A. w. Ellis proposed: Grading and
gravelng, s1.10 per lineal foot; curb, &c
per lineal foot; sidewalk lie per square
lOOt, CIOss NdlhS, ol per llItdl IOOt.
H. Horton proposed: Grading and !
graveling. soc per lineal foot; curb, SOC |
per lineal foot; sidewalk. 91sc per square |
foot; crosswalks, 81 per lineal foot.
c. w. Shafer proposed Grading and |
graveling. SOC per lineal foot; curb. 30c |
per lneal foot; sidewalk, 10c per square
foot; crosswalks, 81 per lineal foot.
Nowlin e. McCombs proposed Grad |
ing and graveling, 66c per lineal foot. |
curb, &c per lineal foot; sidewalk, 9,tc |
per square FOOT crosswalks, soc per lin |
cal foot.
Samuel McCray proposed: Grading !
and graveling, SIC per lineal foot; curb, |
30c per lineal foot; sidewalk 91a per |
square foot crosswalks (granite), Soc |
per lineal foot
Frank Townsend proposed Grading |
and graveling, SOC per lineal foot; curb
34c per lineal foot; sidewalk 12c per
square foot; crosswalks, 90c per lineai |
foot.
VIM. c. Huey proposed: Grading and |
nc per lineal foot; curb PIC |
per lineal foot; sidewalk. 91ac per square
foot; crosswalks zoe per lineal foot
M. S. Cummings proposed Grading |
and graveling, 97c per lineal foot curb, |
33c per lineal foot; sidewalk, 111Ac pc, |
square foot; crosswalks, S1.15 per lineal |
foot.
Referred to the board of public works
To improve Bauchet street, from i
Date to Avila street-F. Grant proposed
Grading and graveling. SOC per lineai
foot; curb, soc per lineal foot sidewalk, !
31ac per square foot; sewer, soc per lin
cal foot.