The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1897-06-02

letting the contract is sufficiently "adver-
tised for three weeks in such newspaper
HUSBAND AND WIFE-NECESSARIE
EXPENSE OF BURIAL.
2237. Lawrence C.. c. Scott vs. Garothers
ct al. Affirmed. Henley. il. Upon the
death OF his wife, who has been forced TO
abandon him because of his cruel treat
ment and who owns a cottage house of the
value of 1866 and has begun suit for dl-
yorce, a husband owning $4,000 is liable
for the value of a casket and burial robe
OF reasonable price furnished for ana neceS-
sary TO give her decent burial the same
being furnished at the request OF a nelSh-
Dor of the woman by an undertaken having
knowledge of the facts and by him charged
TO the husband. .. Such articles are neces-
saries. s. A man who forces his wife TO
abandon him because of cruel treatment IS
legally bound to one who supplies her with
necessaries. 4. The ownership by the wlIe
Of an amount OF property Inadequate to
supply her with neceSs8TieS does not excuse
the husband from supplying them.
JURISDICTION-APP COURT
EQUITABLE LIEN.
2l42 Boone c. c. Smith ct al. VS.: Bar
Der. Transferred to Supreme Court. Robin
son, il Where the judgment OF the court
is founded altogether upon the deIenaahts
counter-claim and grants the relief therein
prayed but denies the original plalntllI any
of the relief asked in his complaint sucn
counter-claim must be looked TO IN deter
mining the Jurisdiction OF an appear taken
by the original plaintiff from such Judg-
ment. ?. Where such counter-cialn9 sets sets
an eaIitable lien upon property for an I'M
paid balance of the purchase price, 1urls-
diction of the appeal is IN the supreme
Court
Superior Court.
Room John L. McMaster, Judge
Louis Hellman VS. Frederick N. Cady;
note. Finding and judgment for pialhtln
against defendants for $274.1S. Finding OF
defendant Bailey's security for note ana
ordered that property of defendant Cady be
first exhausted
ages Plaintiff dismisses at his cost: ,
Samuel Rittenhouse VS.. T. II. & l. Rail-
road Company. On trial by jury.
Room Lawson M. Harvey, Judge.
Della Miller VS. Henry j. Miller; divorce.
Decree granted plaintiff.
Room 3-Vinson Carter. Judge.
Hardin Parrish ct al VS.. Christina Corwin
ct al; foreclosure. Finding and Judgment
for plaintiff against David CorWln Tor SozooI
Elmer Marshall VS.. Henry w. Bennett ct
al; bill of exchange. Dismissed ana costs
paid.
Alpha Medsker VS.. Peter M. Pursell; con-
tract on trial by court.
Minnie c. Schwab VS.. Citizens Street
railroad Company; damages. Dismissed py
agreement at defendants cost. Judgment
Anna L. Kissei VS.. Capitol City Cycling
Club ct al; foreclosure. On trial by court
Circuit Court.
Henry Clay Allen, Judge.
Charles Rose VS.. Henry J. Schell. Dis
missed and costs paid.
Eliza r. Champ VS.. Ellen w. Althouse's
estate. Submitted to court. Evidence
heard and finding for costs and judgment
against estate for $1,670 and costs.
~August A. Champ VS.. Ellen w. Althouse 5
estate Claim dismissed and judgment
against estate for costs.
James S. Cruise vs. Ellen w. AlthouSe 5
estate Submitted to court. Evidence heard
and finding for plaintiff and Judgment
against estate for $78.24 and costs.
New Suits Filled.
John M. Jones VS.. Frank R.. Harding;
damages. Superior Court, Room 3.
Merchants National Bank VS.. Joseph COX;
suit on note. Superior Court Room 2
Railroadmens Building and Savings AS
ISOLATION vs. Sarah G. MorningStar ct al. );
suit to foreclose mortgage. Superior Court
Room 2.
William r. Mercer VS.. James w. Keogh;
suit in replevin. Circuit Court.
John r. Richie VS.. Thomas A. Morgan;
suit on note. Superior Court, Room l.
Aetna Savings and Loan Association vs.
Samuel L. Mohler ct al; suit to foreclose
mortgage. Superior Court Room 2:
William Dell VS.. Theodore Dell ct AL;
complaint for petition. Circuit Court.
Ennis Champ VS. Daniel w. Bolen ct al;
suit on note Superior Court, Room 3.
Lydia l.. Ends VS.. Dudley V. Ends; di-
vorce. Superior Court, Room l.