New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1897-03-20

inneaa vom 10 pass the bill because nothing can
more certainly prove to the American people ,ha ~
you are .u unworthy OF Inc ""S' Nv" ''''''
The debate closed by Mr. pngley REP s.; M Sac;
TO a similar occasion in the House four or hVe
9s@ the
that used to-day Gentlemen had PLAYED the p rove
than il was four or five years ago. (Applausel
! What is the situation presented to-day? Following
TO their promises the country had faced constant
deficit In the rsyennSs s s s ISy an M na Of
NoOo.OOo a year This sum had been borrowed on
@ are ~na se SS n viii
throughout the next fiscal year at the rate OF
vened in extraordinary session A bill has been
framed to increase he revenues so as 10 meet me
/ that. impora,ons are being made in large quaint
ties of wool which is now the free list and upon
revenues of the Government the rate Of 81 900
Every desire r1 and demand
Sa we S G Tpp pit ThG with
the public business? The rule Is right and proper
ties of the situation hope that the gentlemen on
III. SIDE viii not fai; 70 40 that wh'ch we were
THE RESOLUTION ADOPTED.
! The resolution was agreed to-l7s to 1872 The vote
was party one the Republicans voting for the
resolution and all others voting against 1t. except
Mr.. Howard pop. Ala) who was recorded In the
Affirmative There was slight applause on the an
Mr.. Henderson (iaep Iowa. presented the resolu-
ton of the Committee on Rules FOR the, consideia-
Gn f ns Il G SsE be at %
the following order: Sundry Civil. General Def
on each S Was to be- had the biz read in @
and hen The vote taken on is ;p passage m thew
to the President for his signature except the
General Deficiency. which had not been finally
1t contained the Items approved by the House and
conference and later approved by the House. The
theory on WHICH the rule had been framed. ne sald
duty it was 10 consider these bills was safe guide
for the conduct of the present House. For himself.
The resolution was BY Mssr Nc
Mln Dem, TENN, Holman Dem. Ind De , A.
dDem md Pearson 1Rep. y. q; and cox Dem.
The han burden of hsr ha
and unwarranted. and the House should not appr9,,
pirate s72oDcoo with only four hours debate half
MI Pearson expressed regret that he owed to the
resolution, because his opposition TO the sundry
Civil bin was that it gave TO DEMOCRATS bounty
! of N0S.cO0 on sugar raised after they had perpe-
! trated the folly known as the Wilson bill.
A BOUT BETWEEN SAVERS AND MMIL11N.
Preceding the discussion of the resolution there
was an exciting passage between Messrs. McMn
! Dem. TENN and Sayers Dem. Tex) which
indicated that the late contest for the leadership
| o. the minority had left some asDerities in the
! o contestants.
suggested that the time for the minority be con-
! trolled bv the gentleman from Texas. Mr.. Sayers.
/ because he was familiar with the bills. The re-
| Spouse Of the after TO this aroused Mr.. McMiin
who vehemently declared that he proposed to have
| something to say the question. whether he Knew
| ANYTHING about II not.
| Mr.. Sayers explained that he was mercy re,
spending to The suggestion Of Mr. Holman and had
ter retorted that he was acting only on his rights:
and asked the Speaker whether as m e,o or
was 10 control the time against it or the gentle
man from Texas
tlernan from Tennessee, who thereupon offered 10
s sa MT fnS9 tine s he
Messrs. Northway Oep;. Ohio and W. A. stone
lion for the reasons that this Congress should have
had nothing TO do with these pills ana n thai he
the ex- President who should have signed the bills
| or vetoed them
! PARTISAN FEELING RUNS HIGH.
Mr. Cannon Rep, I'D closed the discussion
| the resolution. and In tho course OF his speech
| partisan feeling high and there was much ey-
citement He said the sundry Civil bill. which had
met the criticism Of the gentleman from Missouri
(Mr. De Armond), "who never did know anything
about the bill and would know anything
about IT," excepting the river and harboT items,
was the best that had passed Congress; in twenty
years The river and harbor items. however were
pursuant 10 law and the bill sh ould be passed.
Mr. McMillin-You say the items OF the bill
are in pursuance Of law? Is there any law for the
construction of a soldiers home at your home.
non laughter and hsre
law to care for the disabled veterans OF the
Gcaon Of Se i Guiding place has been
| recommended by the Board of Managers And
wl'm and Missouri and elsewhere to the con-
trary Notwithstanding (Applause)
cesGns asd i n.y. tnnnos piS
session and the ast
and and applause by the RepubcansJ, 1t found the
G n 5he deep Se 'q rnt no OF
people INSTRUCTED It, and last ran said fi ,gn
| Voice-And new men TO do 1t!
| Mr. Cannon-Yes, and new men IN power Inc
Republican party. always having the courage OF
convictions orders the passssge T Of .ar s
McMilhm objected. ] wished that had chestnut
6e Se ne The was 10 Biz Ought
| pass. Let pass them and send them 10 a Presi-
them. WppiauseJ Let us pass these bills and the
| tariff bill and shall be away from here before
dog days.
ANOTHER OUTBURST OF PASSION.
On a division Of the House there was a large ma
| jority in favor of passing the resolution, where
| upon Mr.. McMilln asked for vote by yeas and
| nays This aroused fresh outburst Of partisan
| passion. and things were unusually lively for a
| few minutes.
General Henderson (Rep. Iowa.. rising. with vsi
| bic signs Of annoyance. exclaimed: 1--WE gave YOU
additional time for discussion. Why seek TO delay
| US now?'
Mr. McMnlin met this challenge by rushing down
| the aisle toward tho pit; shouting: II told you |
right, The G Gen. time NV we w
and nays Mr.. Speaker.
Mr. McNillin--You shall have them.
And everybody apparently was up So the yeas
and HI'n nays yse1 were ordered.
| The vote on the passage Of the resolution re-
| suited: Yeas I73; nays. 1l6. Messrs. Pearson and
| Iinnav (Rep " CO voted with the opposition
| against the resolution. they being the only deva
tons from a strict party vote.
| Pursuant 10 the vote just taken. the Speaker an
| nounced that the House would proceed 10 consider
| the Sundry Civil bill. Mr.. Sayers Dem, TexD
occupied the time in opposition to the bill