The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1897-02-05

closed, and under the decree of foreclosure
the land was sold on July &c. 1873, and r
became the purchaser; neither A nor ms
wife redeemed from said sale. but within
the year of redemption the land was re-
deemed by D; afterwards, by means OF con,
veyances, the title becomes vested In +
who is the present owner ,it e for IN iS
ton under Section 2652 r. s., 1894. Held
that the foreclosure of the mortgage 10 IL
and the sale hereunder Invested A and ms
wife of their rights in the land and that
ID had the right to redeem from said SALE
and that the widow has no interest in the
Appellate Court.
2O11. Board of Commissioners VS.. Water
Company. Allen c. c. Reversed. Conn
stock c. i'll. Where way is laid across
an existing highway and bridge IS neces-
sary for the continued use of the highway
the party locating the latter is bound TO
build and maintain the bridge; but If the
highway Is located across an existing way
of any kind the public must maintain the
bridge. 2. Under the acts or 1916 ana Sii
of the General Assembly the duty was inn
posed upon the trustees of the wabash and
Erie canal TO construct and MAINTAIN all
bridges where public highways crossed the
canal. Held that the purchaser of the canal
property and his grantee took the properly
with the burdens imposed upon the trus-
2lO1 E. &. w. r. r. Co. VS.. Waldorf. st.
Joseph G.. G. Affirmed. Robinson, il.
A construction on a former appeal of Ian
the case. 2. When a person is injured by
the construction of railroad across lands
which he is entitled to the use of for a
certain time he may recover on one suit
all damages that flow from the wrongful
act, and IL the act done is necessarily in
furious and is of a permanent nature the
party injured may at once recover his
damages for the whole injury. ) Where
a witness has already detailed to the jury
all the knowledge he has on the subject, 1t
is not erroneous for the court TO refuse to
allow him to testify as an expert. 4. When
@ witness is asked TO give conversation
had at some time previous with another
person he must give the conversation as II
occurred or the substance of 1t, and IL is
for the jury and court to determine what
the parties intended.
Superior Court.
Room 1-John l.. McMaster, Judge.
Thos. Rock VS.. Julia Woods; mechanic S
lien Consolidated with cause No. 1873. Il.
d. Brooks VS.. Julia NJ. Woods: mechanics
lien. Judgment for b. ID. Brooks VS.. plain
tiff for $61.s2. Finding and judgment for
plaintiff Rock for SO
VIM. c. Bronson VS.. Nellie Cook, C. L.
Cook: on notes. On trial by court
Room 2-Lawson NJ. Harvey, Judge.
Theresa Wilhelm and Elizabeth Steeb VS..
Horace HEM and Francis Hem; Injunction
and damages Demand $4,000. On trail by
court.
Criminal Court.
Frank McCray Judge.
The State of Indiana VS.. Adolph Noble:
cruelty 10 cnllQrSu. iitu HlOliOii
TO dismiss the appeal from the city court.
Motion sustained. Cause certified back TO
the lower court
The State of Indiana VS.. Nelson Wells;
selling liquor on Sunday. Plea of not guilty.
Tired by the court.
New Suits Filed.
Charles l.. Palmer Carrie Palmer; d.
vorce. Room 2.
Elizabeth Woods VS.. Andrew c. johnson
ct al; foreclosure. Room 1.
Joseph H. Pattison, guardian, VS.. Emma
Rathsonn ct al. foreclosure. Room 3.
Nora G. Collett VS.. John n. Collett; di-
vorce Room 8.