The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1897-01-23
Appsu.te Divisio. Desisis...
Suprsms Court. First Department.

Supreme Cosrf First Department.
v.ns siss:s'n pa 5.'':s Pp.ads 1n:1
affirmed with costs.
ct ar Hc.posSSlRssr armes MisS Of, M' eo.se
and disbursements:
VI, Ausustus olason ct al. appciiant-order Or.
nrmsd with go costs and disbursements.
vs. Ms,tnew aessrie1. OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES aSS re-.
vcrsed and Judgment ordered directed In opinion
wan sruat p. j.. snd B.1psss j.. d..easinsS. "
Edward N. Cutler. respondent, va J. Roduan
David Mcclure as receiver. rsspoadent. vs.. John
W. wilson. appciiant-Judgment reversed with
demurrer with costs. with leave to pIainiin 70
amend complaint within twenty days ON payment
Maggie 10 wis. respondent. vs.. John Doyle ct al.
observation-disclosures af1rmed with costs.
rhe Mayor. Sc.. sppeiisnt-Jadgment reversed, new
trial ordered. costs TO applca Z" abide event
Rsilrosd Company. appsiiant-Jadsrnent reversed.
new trial ordered. costs to appelant TO abids event.
Cuba Man stsamship Company. sppeiiant-Juds.
mcnt and order reversed. new trial ordered. .osts
Alice A. Matthews. appellant. Va. MARY I. Dcgrofr
as executriI. observation-disclosures reversed. now
Georse BSfahsm ct al. respondent. VS.. Edison
Electric Illuminating Company. appeliant-Judx
1eorae W. stephens .. receiver. respondent. Va.
Meriden Britannia Company ct al. appellants-
britannia Company, with costs TO plaintiff, Judg
ment and order reversed as TO defendant, Page and
costs 70 them TO abide event.
Edward II. Meyers ct al. respondents. va. Clinton
J. Payne ct al, appeilant-Judsmen an,rmed with
frederick Duhrkop. respondent. vs.. Isaac White
sosts and dis6u, be paid by appellant
Albert 4. Manda, appellant, va Emiius Euenne.
respondent-order affirmed with $40 costa and lis
William n. Plandrow. appellant. rs'Hsnry n.
ee . " saG and notion denied WITH
John c. Stevens. respondent. VS.. sturscs Dewey.
buisementa.
Cornelius Nertr. respondent. VA Theodore Fe.
nouet .s President. tc.. Appelisnt-order reversed
with $40 costs and disbursements and the motion
Robert Y. Hsssipss ct al. sppsIans.. vs. con.olr.
dated Dental Manufacturing Company. respondent
8iSs.si Ro.so an infant. &c. appeI,eat. rs me
Second Avenue Railroad Company. respondent.
peal d,snissed with SO costs: on dsrenasnt's ap
peal. order reversed with $40 costs ami disburso.
menis, and morton to vAcate order granting plain,
tin ieAve TO sue In for ma paupcrs granted with SIC
costs.
Third Avenue Railroad Company. appeiiant-order
modified ~ directed In opinion, and As thus mod.
ned affirmed without costs TO either party In this
Dorothea R. Christ. respondent. VS.. Third Avenue
Iss1eS in Spipion IN ReeIm.n va inc .sms "
ant. decided herewith. ana a. thus modified af.
hrmed without COS" 10 si,hsr party
BACON. Observation-Disclosures modified as directed
In sne p As ss %oaed VAN Rsa
wiiistt D. Morgan. respondent, vs. George q.
Young OF al, Experimentation denied upon pay
ment Of go costs within nve days
ro wlam a. m Sensa %ts Az ca. Rail-
People ex rel. Jacob smormyer vs.. Theodore
Roosevelt g. a.Motion for rs, ,su granted
settlement grant d.
Marietta Ludinstou VS.. Androw J. Ditmsn-Mo,ion
RFQ mi al NWI