Watertown republican. [volume] (Watertown, Wis.) 1860-1906, 1897-05-05
SUPREME COURT CASES.
Motions for Rehearing Denied In
Many ances-Commer-
cial Bank Case.

Madison, Wis, April 30.-[Special.] i
The following decisions were handed
down by the Supreme court today:
State ex rel. Buchanan vs.. mayor and
etc. of Oshkosh-Motion for rehearlng de-
MED.
Geilfuss VS.. Corrigan-Motion for rehear-
Bank Of Commerce VS.. Taylor-Motion to
strike bill of exceptions from record grant
j. V. Farwell & Co. VS.. Wolf-Motion for
rehearing denied.
State vs. Shove-Motion for rehearing de-
MED.
Strehlow VS.. Petit ct al.-Judgment re-
verSed and remanded for new trial.
Van Horn VS.. Van Dyke-Those portions
of the judgment appealed from reversed
and cause remanded for further proceed
ingS in accordance with opinion.
Swan VS.. Porter-Judgment reversed and
cause remanded for further proceeding.
Silverthorn VS.. Wylie-Judgment af-
frmed.
State ex rel Smith VS.. board of educa-
ton of Eau Claire-Judgment reversed and
cause remanded for new trial.
Heller VS.. city of NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. re-
versed and cause remanded for further
German-American bank VS.. Devlin-Judg-
mcnt affirmed.
Morawetz VS.. Sun Insurance company
Mathewig VS.. Mann-Those portions Of
judgment which Mann appealed from re-
versed and cause remanded for further pro
Tyson VS.. acknowledgement reversed and
action remanded with direction to dismiss
the complaint.
Clausen VS.. Hale-Judgment affirmed.
Frechmann VS.. supreme council of Royal
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT reversed and action
remanded for new trial.
Doctor ct al. VS.. Riedel ct al.-Order re-
versed and action remanded with direction
to sustain the demurrer Justice Marshall
diSSentS.)
Saladin VS.. Kraayvager-Judgme af-
irmed.
Keef VS.. acknowledgement affirmed.
Cole ct al. VS.. GetZinger-Judgment re-
versed with costs except as to defendant
Getzinger, and as to him affirmed with
costs and cause remanded with directions
to enter judment in favor Of plaintiff and
Charlotte Lessee, awarding to each one
fifth of the value of the premises with
costs.
State ex rel NJ T. & w. Railway COM
pany VS.. common council of Tomahawk-
Judgment reversed and cause remanded for
new trial.
Smith VS.. Observation-Disclosures affirmed
McGeOch VS.. Carlson-Judgment reversed
and cause remanded for new trial.
Glapella VS.. Biglow-.Judgment affirmed
except as to the portion awarding eXecu-
ton against the executors, and as to such
portion reversed without costs.
Homestead Land company VS.. Becker
Packard VS.. Kinzie Avenue Heights com
pany-Judgment reversed and cause re-
manded for further proceedings.
Schiller VS.. Chicago 4 North Western
Railway company-Order affirmed. Justice
WinSlow diSsentS.)
MomSen VS.. Plankinton-Order affirmed
Moody VS.. Streissguth Clothing company
Judgment affirmed.
Wfnterfield VS.. Cream City Brewing COM
pany-JudgmeIt reversed and cause re-
manded with directions to confirm report
of the referee and to give judgment for the
plaintiff according to its terms
f. Dohmen company vs. Manufacturers
and Builders Fire Insurance company
Judgment reversed and cause remanded for
new trial.
Same VS.. Niagara Fire Insurance COM
pany-Salne judgment.
Wells VS.. city of Observation-Disclosures
reversed and cause remanded for further
Levy VS.. WilcoX-Judgment reversed and
cause remanded with directions to enter
Judgment sustaining the plea of statute of
limitations.
Mitchell VS.. Western Paving Supply com
acknowledgement reversed and cause re-
handed for further proceedings.
kneeland vs. Same-Same decision.
Boyd vs.. Same-Same decision.
FollanSbee VS.. Kellner-Judgment re-
versed and cause remanded with directions
to dismiss the complaint.
EnOS vs. Sanger-JUdgment reversed and
cause remanded for further proceedings in
accordance with opinion.
Jones VS.. city of Observation-Disclosures
reversed and cause remanded for new trial
Franey VS.. Warner-Judgment reversed
and cause remanded with directions to en-
ter judgment in accordance with opinion.
MalOney vs. Warner-Same Judgment