Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1897-02-25

VoU ARE MERELY REQUIRED TO AP-
L pear IN an action brought Eganst you
" the above named pl6inuh ~ INC blsttict
Court OF The Third judicial District OF lhe
state OF Utah, and 10 answer tho complaint
iilod therein within ten days exclusive OF the
day OF service) after the service on you OF
tins sumtnons--if served within this county,
or, II served out OF this county, but IN ms JUS
trict. Va hin twenty days. Otherwise within
forty dAyH-or Judgment BY detsut VIII NC
taken against you, according TO the prayer OF
said compliant.
1hc said action lie brought to have Judgment
against The defendant. Tor the tuin OF S!ls,l
principal ana interest thereon on AZ the rate
OF per cent per annum IRON Anu since Luns
20. 1880, lesB 81 paid August ~. 1925, PAD
August "a, 1875, $3.50 PAID August 81, 1870, Y
paid September 7, lsga. and q % paid October
I. lsiA For s31 attorneys fees and costs OF
sult; alleged to DO due iho PLAINTIFF from the
Defendant, Hugh A. Arnold. upon q certain
promissory note. executed by the sSid
on the 9oth day OF June, is9i,
for the sum of s2iall, Que IN one
year after date. with interest at
$ per cent per annumi the same being due
ana wholly unpaid, save and except tue sums
us above set forth, beng secured by mort
gage OF even dhte Herewith on the promises
hereinafter described, executed by the de-
PENDANT, Hugh a. Arnold, and his wife susan
arnold, to the PLAINTIFF, that these plaintiffs
are tho lawful owners and holders Of SAID note
and mortgage; that by the terms OF said mort
gage the ABOVE named defendant. hugh A.
Arnold. agreed to pay u reasonable attorneys
Zee, 10 nave the usual decree OF tnlH court Tor
the foreclosure OF sRld mortgage. and the eale
of SAID premises, adiudging the proceeds OF
said sale may DO applied to the payment OF the
amount found due to these plaintiffs, after the
payment Of the costs OF the touit, ana eN.
pensrs Of the sale, that defendants, and all
persons claiming under them, DO barred and
ioreclosed OF all Claim or equity OF redemption
in SAID premises, and every part thereof thar
plaintiffs have judgment and execution agar
the snId defendant, Hugh a. Arnold, for
deficiency which may remain after applying
all The proceeds of the sale OF sald
premisos properly applicable TO the
satisfaction OF said Judgment That
The plainuH or any party to this suit may be.
come purchaser at said sale; that the sheriff
execute u deed to the purchaser; that tho pur-
chaser be let into posseEaion Of shid premises
on production of the sherifrs deed therefor;
and that the piantiis have such other and
further relief in the premises as to this court
may seem just and equitable
Sni1 premises are described as fOllOwsi Lots
Hfty-Une (bi), nfty.two t52l IN Block three l3l
in Central Park subdiyision OF LOte !, and
and lG IN block Al, Ten Acre HAT IA Big
Field survey. same bel Bltuate IN Salt Lake
City and county. Utah.
kns you are hereby notified that II you fail
to appear and answer the said complaint
as above required, the said plaintiff viii apply
to the Court for the relief demanded therein.
Wines the Honorable Judges. ana the seal
OF the District Court OF the Third Jul
diciSL district. In and for the state of
SEAL Utah this 22nd dny of January, IN
the year OF our Lord one thousand
eight hundted and ninety-seveD
DAVID =. DUHBhR Clerk.
Uy GRO II InnNIs Dpuuty CLERK