Griggs courier., 1897-03-12
Some Startling Figures Showing Systematic Suppression
Of Republican Votes.
Tho South Woud Have Given lajoy for Mckinley Did the
North Could Her Voters Have Had Fair Treatment
Discussion Of Election Results Based Upon
Official Figures

The final count by Congress of the cleo
toral vote, coupled with the various
charges which have been made by differ
ent people Of excessive votes In certain OF
the Northern States and suppression OF
the Republican votes in the South, sug-
igest careful study of the figures Of the
election in the light Of those of other cleo
lions and records Of population as well as
votes.
\ Gov. Altgeld and Senator Allen have
charged a fraudulent excess of votes In
'nenrly all of the close States which were
carried by the Republicans in the late
campaign. including Ohio, Indiana, Michi-
gan, illinois, Kentucky. Iowa, Wiscon-
sin, Minnesota, Oregon, California, West
Virginia, Maryland and even Pennsylva-
mia. Senator Allen published as an official
document q paper containing charge of
this character and also introduced reso-
luton calling for an investigation, but
has not up to this time made any move in
the way of even asking consideration for
his resolution.
Fortunately, it is possible by examining
the figures of the census Of 1880 to get a
pretty fair idea as to whether the alleged
vote IN any State was actually in excess
OF the number of voters IN the State. The
census Of 1880 shows the number Of males
above the age Of twenty ty-one In each State
and It 10 reasonable to assume that there
has been q very material increase in the
number Of males Of voting age in all parts
Of the country, and especially in the Mis-
isissippi valley, In the six years between
the date Of the census and the election Of
1888. This makes It comparatively easy
to examine in an intelligent way the
charges Of fraud as made by Senator Al
len and Gov. Altgeld.
Let us examine . few Of these charges.
In Ohio Mr.. Allen charges that the
fraudulent excess" Of votes in 1895 was
04,tOO. Let US see. Ohio, according to
his figures gave 1,O11, $40 votes. There
Were In Ohio In, 1890, according to the
census, 1,O18, 4A males Of voting age, or
more than 5000 in excess Of the number
Of votes cast in 1896. Ohio increased her
population 1888 per cent in the decade
from 1880 to 1890, and 1t is reasonable to
assume that, with the great prosperity
which has attended her development Of
manufactures III the natural gas region
In the past few years, the increase of
population from 1890 to 1896 has been, at
= very low estimate, ten per cent, which
would bring the male population of 21
years and upwards, up to 1,117,OOO. or
1O6. 600 In excess Of the number Of votes
cast, yet Mr.. Allen charges officially, bot
admits that he does not know by what
process he arrives at the conclusion, that
94,6OO fraudulent excess" Of votes was
cast in that State.
In Indiana and Illinois the total num-
Der Of votes cast in 1896 slightly exceeds
the total number of males above 21 years
Of age shown BY the census of 1890 In
those States. In Illinois the excess of
votes in 1896 above those Of voting age
~ 1880 In that State is less than 1900.
Illinois gained in population in the decade
from 1850 to 1890 24.32 per cent. In view
OF the great number Of people drawn to
Chicago during the Worlds Fair period,
many of whom remained there, It is rea-
sonable to suppose that the rate of gain
since 1890 has been quite as rapid and
that the increase of population and In the
number OF persons of voting age is fully
~ per cent. This would bring the number
OF males of voting age in the State up to
600, or 232, 600 in excess Of the num-
her OF votes actually cast. In Indiana
the increase Of population has been much
more rapid probably than in Illinois, be-
cause OF the wonderful development of
the natural gas region of that State, where
industries have been extremely active and
prosperous. even while there was depres-
sion and absolute inactivity in nearly all
Z other parts of the country. The total
male population of Indiana above 21 years
Of age in 1890 was 500, ,O66, but with the
phenomenal growth of population which
i has had since that time, It has probably.
increased 100, 600, 20 that there n everv
reason to believe that the total number of
voters In the State was, in 1895, nearly
or quite 700, 900. while the total number
OF votes cast was only 6S7, ,2S4.
1 The Voters Did Not All Vote.
Il 10 unnecessary to pursue In detail the
Investigation Of the relation Of the votes
cast to the voting population in all the
States charged with fraudulent excesa"
aof votes IN Senator Aliens official paner.
The following table gives the number Of
males OF voting age In each Of the Statea
3 IN question in 1890 and beside 1t the num.
ber of votes cast In 1896. When II 4 re.
membered that the natural growth ofspon.
ulatton in these States in the six vears
!. since the census of 1880 is from 10 tn *
per cent Il will be seen. that in NO case
was the vote actually cast In 1890 nearlv
= large; 40 the number Of males over the
age Of n years which must have haen n
these States on Nov. 8, 1895.
Table showing the number Of male. ~
voting age in 1880 and the numbar of
votes cast in 1895: ...1 a
sss. ;slS &. Males above
r. N 81 ~ evo ins COO A. aor<, =