Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1897-02-13

Arnold and T.. y Neltch, defendants.
UoU ARE HEREBY REQUIRED 10 APP.
L pear IN an action brought sgainst you
by the above named plaiutin IN the District
Court Of the third Judicial District OF the
state of Utah, ana To answer the compinint
hled therein within ten days exclusive o, the
day OF seryicel after tho service on you of
this summons-if served within thiB county.
or. II served out of this county. but IN this dis
trict, wi,hln twenty dnyfi Otherwise within
forty days--or Judgment by default will be
taken against you, according 10 the prayer of
said complaint.
The SAID action is brought to have judgment
against the defendants for the sum of s2js.ll
principal aud interest thereon on 1T The rate
OF per cent per annum FROM aud since June
20 1886, less 81 paid August ~, 1895, $ paid
August q. 1885. $3.50 paid August 81, 1859, 81
paid September Z. 1875. and SO 90 paid october
Z. 1895 For $50 attorneys fees and costs of
suit; alleged 10 be due The plaintiffs from the
Defendant, Hugh A Arnold, upon certain
promissory note, executed by the sad
defendant, arnold, to the plaintiff
ior the sum Of, Of sa1sil, Quo IN one
o per cent per annum; tue same being due
and wholly unpaid, save and except the sumo
ms above sot forth. beng secured by mort.
gage OF even date Herewith on the promises
hereinafter described, executed by the de-
PENDANT, Hugh a. Arnold, and his wife susan
Arnold to the plaintiffs; that these plaintiffs
are the lSwful owners and holders OF saId note
and mortgage, that by the terms OF SAID mort
gage the ABOVE named defendant Hugh a.
Arnold, agreed to pay q Reasonable attorneys
fee. To have the usual decree OF this court for
the foreclosure OF SAID mortgage. and the sale
OF sad premises, ndjudging the proceeds OF
said sale may DO applied 10 the payment OF the
amount found duo to these plnintfe. after the
payment OF the costs of the DOurt and eS
penses Of the sale; that defendants, and all
persons claiming under them, be barred and
ioreclosed OF all clRim or equity OF redemption
10 SAID premises, and every part thereof that
plaintiffs have judgment aud execution against
the sad Defendant, Hugh A. Arnold for any
deficiency which iua y remain after applying
al he proceedA OF the sale OF anii
premises properly applicable to the
satisfaction OF said judgment That
come purchaser at said sale; that the sheriff
execute deed 10 the purchaser that the pur-
chaser be lat into possession 81 SAID premises
on production OF the sherlHs deed therefor
and that the plaintiffs have such other an d
further relief in the premises as TO this court
may seem tust and equitable
Said premises are described as follows; Lots
tifty.one (sl), fifty TWO (52l IN Block three ~
IN Central Park subdivision OF LOIS l, 2 and 5
and ~ IN Block Al, Ten Acre nat ga" Biz
Field survey. same boiqg situate In ealt Lake
CITY and county, utan.
And you arc hereby notified that IL you fail
to appeRr and answer the said complaint
as above required, the said plaintiff will apply
to the Lourt for Tho relief demanded therein.
Witness the Honorable Judges. anu the zeal
OF the District Court OF tue Third Ju-
dicial District, In and for the state OF
IsEALI Utah this 92nd day OF January. IN
the year Of our LORD one thousand
eight hundred and nlnety-seyen.
DAVID g. DUNBAR CLERK,
by GEO. ID. LOOMS, Deputy CLERK