The Stark County Democrat. [volume] (Canton, Ohio) 1833-1912, 1897-04-15
ANOTHER COURT.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
MAY BE LOCATED
In the Government Building, with
Such Assistants as May BE Re-
quired-A Representative
Visits Canton.

NAslAH ShhNOhs
NJ. A Smallev, United states marshal
of the Northern District of Ohio, was in
Canton yesterday and was theSguest,
during his stay, Of Postmaster John f..
| Monnot. Mr. Monnot introduced bim to
various citizens anu visited the court
rooms in the afternoon, where members
Of the berch and bar were met.
Marshal Smallsy's purpose in coming
to Cant1n is one in which all citizens are
interested. For some time it has been
evident that there should be established
10 this section Of Ohio, district court of
the United States. 1t is patentIto all
that Canton by location and importance
is the city in which this court should
be located, bling so accessible from east,
west, north and south. The matter had
been talked Of to some extent and was
made to re ioh tho ears Of the department
at Washington. Mr.. Smalley was sent
here by the department Of Justice to make
an investigation with reference to the
feasibility Of establishing the court here.
He visited the government building and
was shown through by Custodian Mon
not. The purpose was to discover IL there
were sufficient room in the building, tax
ing into consideration the improven ents
entailed in the appropriation bill be.
fore congress, to establish 4 court room,
clerks Office, jury room and deputy
United States marshals office. 1t was
found that there would he room on tire
second floor.
1t is believed that Mr.. Smalley will
make a favorable report ard that when
the appropriation bill passes, which will
in all probability be not later than next
winter, such a court will be established
here. This will entail the appointment Of
a Judge u clerk, deputy marshal ana
such other assistants as are required. II
will be splendid thing for Canton ae it
will bring strangers from distance, in
attendance at court, aud other advan-
tages will accrue.
Daniel Lsnker has commenced an ao-
ton against Frank A. Pisro aud others
to collect 81 800 alleged to be due on a
promissory note secured by mortgage
Judgment for the amount and sale Of the
property is prayed for Clark, Amber
& Clark filed the petition.
is.tt
Heat enl Power Company filed an ans
wer to the petition Of she Central Union
Telephone Company which was filed
some weeks ago. The petition Of the
Telephone Company alleges that by rsa-
son of a change in the lines of the Light,
Heat and Power Company it affected the
telephone lines by causing a buzziug In
the telephones. 1t is also claimed by the
Telephone Company that the Light COM
psny has been and Is now using dynamo
Of $3.50 volts. The answer denies this
and also denies that the buzzing com
planned of is in any way caused by the
wires Of the answering company. The
answer concludes by sIying that If the
plaintiff company has any difficulty in
the operation Of its telephones, Of the
charact r complained Of, the same is due
wholly to the imperfect construction of
the same and not by the construction Of
the lighting system of wires. Day,
Lynch &Dsy filed the answer.
Day, Lynch & Days. as attorneys for
he G. Il. & V. Railway Co, have filed
a general denial to the petition of the
Of Fred Heimann. The
answer admits that the boy was killed
on the defendants grounds, but alleges
that it was due to his own oareIessness.
The Canton -Msssillon Electric Railway
Co., by its attorneys, Day, Lynch g. Day,
has fled an answer to the petition of J.
W. Wardwall, receiver of the G. G. & S.
The answer is in relation to
the injunction restraining the street
railway company from laying track
across the tracks of the plaintiff company
in South Market street 1t is set up In
the answer that the right TO lay the track
was granted by an ordinance OF the city
It denies that the defendant
has done or attempted to do
anything it has no right to do.
Gottli.b Kaber has sued Peter Kaiser
for S241 alleged damages BY reason of
" roDgful order of attachment. Nat G.
& J. S. Mclean are plaintiffs attorneys.
The Central Savings bank has com
menoed proceedings against Thomas J.
Malloy ct al, to Tesover 1884 alleged
due on note and secured by mortgage.
Day, Lynch & Day are the banks attor-
neys.
Nicholas Nelchoir has sued John and
Mary Melchoir to recover $700 alleged
due on promissory note secured by
Thayer, Webber and Tur-
ner are plaintiff attorneys
l., j. Midday & Co. have commenced an
action against the City of Canton, Jacob
Geib, treasurer, and Il. II. Belden, clerk,
to have them temporarily restrsinEed
from collecting an alleged illegal ASSESS
ment of Ss49,28. 1t is prayed that in
junction may be made perpetual, after the
hearing Of the case. Miller and Pome-
enc are plaintiffs attorneys,
The case of Emma Clugston VS.. Edward
Sucker, for paternity, was tried this af
ternoon and the defendant found guilty.