Richmond dispatch. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1884-1903, 1897-03-14

are out of steady employment, ana tne
devices they are driven TO 10 keep lie
I'm. For instance, a barber out OF WORK
tramps and gives a hair cut for ono
penny. The second sketch-about the
Anarchists in London-gives description
OF one Of their educational meetings
in the famous Whitechapel District. The
stories in the book, especially that OF
"Allson Hepburns Exploit" are well
told. though the manner Of the telling
Is rather eccentric.
For sale by the J. w. Randolph Com
pany, Richmond
VIRGINIA LAW REGISTER FOR
March 1897.
Table OF Contents: 1. An Unfeigned
Issue. George Bryan. 2. Liability Of
Employer for Acts of Independent Con-
tractor, George +. Cassel. 3. Testimony
of Deceased Witness in Criminal Cases,
Rudolph Bumgardner. 4. United States
supreme Court Decision: St. Louis etc.
Railway Company VS.. Mathews-Rail-
road Companies, Statutory Liability for
fires; Constitutional Law-Due process
of law obligation Of contracts. 5. Viz
ginia Decisions, Reported i'm Full: o.
Emmerson vs. Fay-Master and Servant,
independent contractor; Nuisance. %
Bertha Zinc Company VS.. Martin-Plead-
ing; Variance between pleadings and
proofs; Master and Servant-Safe place,
contributory negligence, risks assumed,
ordinary care, use of dynamite; lnstruc-
tions-ExaminatiOn OF Witnesses: Dis
erection of trial court. Editorial Note,
ordinary care. G. Digest Of Other Re-
cent Virginia Decisions o. Thurston VS..
Hudgins-Oyster Inspectors. o. Mangus
VS.. McClelland-Equitable defences at
law. section S299 of Code; Construction Of
statutes. CD Exchange. etc. Bank, vs..
Fugate-Usury, recovery of payments,
limitations. (D Spilman VS.. Gilpin-
Chancery Practice, continuance, rehear-
ing. verbal stipulations of counsel. 90
Cool vs.. nwealth-Criminal Law,
house-breaking, indictment, time essence
of offence. 90 Benjamin vs. Madden
Fraud. sales of personal property, reten-
ton of possession by vendor; section @7
OF Code. Cd McYeigh VS.. Chamberlain
Presumption of Payment, evidence, can
celled checks; Competency of witnesses,
section S345 Of Code; Exception TO DEPOSIT
ton; Checks. cancelled as evidence. %
powell VS.. City Of Richmond-TaXes in
CITY of Richmond. duration of lien. CD
Reid VS.. City OF Norfolk-Chancery Plead
ing. dismissing bill, leave to amend, ap-
neal: Iniunctions, when appellate court
will not interfere; Streets. electrician
line not additional servitude. QW Col
Inns VS.. Sutton-Chancery Jurisdiction,
objection TO. in appellate court, disputed
boundaries, bill OF discovery; Injunctions,
trespass. irreparable injury, insolvency OF
defendant. 7. Miscellaneous Notes
s. For the Juniors-Different sorts
of legacies. g. Correspondence-rhe
Weatherholtz Case, again, \. H..
Tebbs; Date Of Supply Liens, u. Nj. Pen
dleton.
GRIP. By John Strange Winter. Pub
lished by Stone & Kimball, New YORK
For sale by the j. w. Randolph Com
pany, Richmond.
The motif of this story is TO show now
a purpose Of revenge, cherished for many
wears. may almost instantly fade away
under the inMence of an extraordinary
likeness TO the woman the hero loved IN
youth. The environment OF the hero -
the usual one OF the present day Enghsh
NOVELETTE, usual squire. the usual num-
her OF sons in the army, church, and law;
the usual wealthy aunt with a fortune 10
leave the hero. and all the et eeteras Oh
English life Everything Is usual excep.
the plot OF the story, which Is decidediy
unusual. The purpose Of revenge Is so
prominently kept 10 the front that the
reader heartily tires Of II. until all IL