The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1897-06-16
THE COURT RECORD.



| Frederick Frobenis VS. Margaret Mar
SHALL to quiet title Dismissed and costs
! paid.
State of Indiana ex rel Williams VS..
| Thomas Taggart, auditor ct al. Dismissed
/ at cost of Center school township.
William Covert VS.. Thomas Long; appeal
| from Daniels, j. Z. Dismissed at cost OF
defendant for want Of prosecution.
Sarah Collins vs. City of indianapolis ct
al. damages. Dismissed for want of prose
cution at plaintiffs cost
| Hunt Soap and Chemical Company VS..
Mary Hunt. Dismissed for want OF prose
| cution at plaintiffs cost.
Georgeanna Wren VS.. George w Wren
| divorce. Dismissed for want of prosecution
Charles T. Whitsett VS. Mary Murrey ct
al. on account. Dismissed at cost OF de-
PENDANT Murrey.
| lien. Dismissed for want OF prosecution at
plaintiffs cost,
Willis Privett VS.. William Cumback; dam
| ages Dismissed for want OF prosecution at
| plaintiffs cost.
Oliver Fultz VS. John Corrigan ct al
| damages. Dismissed by plaintiff at his cost.
The Lamprecht Bros Company VS.. Bar
| bara Alt ct al; improvement bond. DIS
missed for want Of prosecution at plalntlH $
cost.
City of Indianapolis VS.. Ralph Comptillo;
| appeal. Dismissed for want of prosecution
| at appellants cost.
Israel Fieischman VS. Joseph Summer
field ct al; replevin Dismissed by plalntiff
Id Ida South VS.. George McCray; breach of
promise. Dismissed for want OF prosecution
| at plaintiffs cost.
Della Davis VS.. James Davis divorce.
Dismissed for want of prosecution at plain
Advance Manufacturing Company VS..
missed by plaintiff at his cost
The Lamprecht Bros. Company VS. h. y.
Martindale ct al; lie? Dismissed Dis, for want
New York Life Insurance Company VS..
S. G.. Peanard; appeal Dismissed for want
of prosecution at defendants cost.
| William j. HAYES ct al, trustees, VS.. An
| ME Evans ct al; Improvement bond. Dis
missed for want of prosecution at plain
Joseph Apert VS.. Werk Soap Company;
appeal Dismissed for want Of prosecution
Alfred Porter VS.. Daniel Foley; damages.
| Dismissed for want of prosecution at plain
Fred Fuehrirg VS.. Valentine Schneider;
| Improvement lien. Dismissed for want of
prosecution at plaintiffs cost.
Richard Kaufman VS.. George F. Kreitlein;
| on account. Judgment by agreement for
plaintiff for IS 219.40 and costs.
Daniel Trittipo VS.. A. Bronson ct al; on
note. Dismissed at PLAINTIFFS cost.
Bluff Road Saving and Loan Association
VS. Isaac Stocker ct al; foreclosure Dis
missed and COSTS paid
Room 2-Lawson M. Harvey, Judge.
Henry r. Hackensnith KS. Phoebe Smelser
ct al. Dismissed by plaintiff and costs paid.
| Della Curtis William H. Koohs ct al.
| foreclosure. Judgment against defendanc
| for $55S.73 and costs; foreclosure and sale
William Lyle VS. Mamie Lyle; divorce.
Decree granted plaintiff
al foreclosure. Judgment against defen-
dant for $1,S147S and costs, foreclosure and
sale ordered.
Cora johnson VS. Marie Rhodius ct al
damages. On trial by jury.
Room 9-Vinson Carter, Judge.
Dell H. H&ckedoan VS. William C. Hacke-
doan divorce. Decree granted plaintiff,
| with custody of Pauline Hackedoan, aged
| eight years; judgment against defendant Ior
| costs
Lydia A. sanderson VS.. Citizens Street
| railroad Company; damages. ON trial by
Circuit Court.
Henry Clay Allen, Judge.
Landvoght Livery, ETC., Company VS. Ma
evidence heard; finding ana Judgment
| against estate for $12O and costs.
Western Paving and Supply Company VS.;
Josh Zimmerman ct al; default Submitted
| to court evidence heard; finding for plain
tiff decree of foreclosure: ludgment against
Wooden 4 Wooden for $53.SS and d. costs cos
| Submitted to court evidence heard; claim
allowed in the sum of $500 and costs; judy
| nlent accordingly.
| McCoy's estate. Argument heard; instruc-
| lions given, jury retires and gives verdict
for plaintiff for $9oo ana ana eosIs r1o,,, +r,s
| tee, ct al Submitted for trial; jury i'm
| paneled and sworn.
New Suits Filed.
Josie Hepler VS.. Thomas Hepler ct a. ;
! Anna BluInlen VS.. Adolph F. Blumein;
divorce Superior Court, Room 2.
Harry B. Burnett ct al. VS.. Roger A.
Sprague ct al. mechanics lien Superior
| Court Room /.
mechanics lien. Superior Court, Room 3.
| Lillian Maelkemus VS.. Leonard HinlSle;
malicious prosecution. Superior Court,
| Room l.