New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1897-07-20
Cashmere
Bouquet
TOILET SOAP and PERFUr1E.

on the other SIDE" said he. addressing the Demo-
Gratis 'ln 1894 were in conference six weeks with
! out reaching on agreement"
"Your work was laid out for you" said En-
| Bailey.
| ley.
"The trouble In 1884," retorted Mr. Bailey. was
! that were trying TO run the Democratic party
with a lot Of Mugwumps in command" daughter
! and applause on the Democratic side)
| Again Mr., Dingey expressed the opinion that one
day would be sufficient for the debate to which MI
| Bailey although disavowing any desire to threaten
the majority. replied that the majority would make
haste by treating the minority fairly. While 1t
was In the power of the majority here to do as they
pleased, he intimated that in the Senate where
| debate could not be limited. the Democrats might
resent unfairness to their colleagues the House
| side.
Mr. Dlngley thought the report ought to be ready
| for the Senate tomorrow I'VE Will let the de-
| bate run for a time" he suggested. "and see
whether it is worth 100000 day. The dispose.
| ton on this side Is to get vote at the earnest
| possible moment"
| This is the earliest possible moment" said Mr.
| Bailey The gentleman surely does not suggest
| vote now He got no further.
REPUBLICANS EAGER FOR THE VOTE.
Voter ''vote!" Voter shouted the Republicans
eagerly.
| Il suggest We walt until sugar stoCh eoVS ny q
little higher" retorted Mr. Bailey sarcasticaiy. III
| has gone up g a share since the agreement was
| reported"
At this point Mr. johnson Rep Ind) appealed
| to Mr. Dingley to permit two days for debate Tho
| Democrats warmly applauded him.
| my opinion" replied Mr.. Dngley, rs that be-
fore the day is over we will find there Is nothing
further to debate and We will! he compelled to
| listen to the same old Nominations"
Mr.. Payne Rep. N W suggested II o'clock to-
| night as the time for taking a vote
| Mr.. Dngley repeated the suggestion to Mr. Ball
| ey. by whom II was Immediately rejected.
Mr.. D1NGLEY EXPLAINS THE CHANGES.
| All efforts to reach agreement having failed.
| Mr.. Dingley with the statement that he would
confer with Mr. Bailey later. opened his speech on
the conference report The figures and details of
the explanation of the changes were dry. but the
| House gave him close and earnest attention. He
| took up each schedule explaining in detail the
changes made and following closely the formal nal
sVt the item ~ of Cyanide q
said that II had been most unwilllngly accorded
sistence by the Senate conferrees.
Concerning the sugar schedule, Mr. Dingley read
y the en new about 100000 increase Of
revenue would be realized as the increase had been
be So ad Ct s e hs
had adj not allowed the retroactive clause Of the 5ii
eome a W f Had 1' he I saG %
Of revenue would have been saved to the Treasury:
the stamp tax. Mr. Todd dem. Mchj asked him
he s Of sarex the Sa nSS Of %s
ssssS r'a ~" 1a. ~, ~. n',s,sn ~w. ,,."an
n5 record Go o Is The machinery of
Mr. Cooper Rsp., WlsJ wanted an explanation
the bnsy Of se
statement submitted by the conferrees. The DIFF
M % the the Honss D s
Of questions about the sugar 2cheSue ana mr.
| btrs who listened attent!vely 10 the questions and
MI Johnson Rep.. Indl wanted to know II the
in the rate on refined sugar to the senae
proats Of the trust on the anticipatory importa-
lions Of raw sugars -. ,.s,,,,,,,,, -, ro.
venting these profits In 1924 when Sggar W q
Seg did Mr. ps sns
son sw s hd
dred pounds, as AGAINST ~ cents in the pending
pubIicans. but Mr. Dockery dem MOI aroused the
the sudden increase in the value Of sugar stock in
anticipation Of the enactment OF the proposed sugar
| schedule.
AN ESTIMATE OF THE REVENUE
As TO the question OF to be raised by the
bill, Mr. Dinghy pointed out the difficulty resulting
from the large antcipatory importations. The bill
| next year. he calculated. would raise $22o.OO0 900.
100000 more than the present law. over S000OOW
had been lost in this years revenues by the impor
tations Of wool and sugar and other things the duty
| on which was raised in the bill. so that he calcu
latod that the bill this year would raise slS5o000Co
| NJ Dlngley declared that there was no doubt that
the revenue produced by the bin would not only be
but allow Republican Administration q begin
Which had been Increased b the late Gd%inis SrS
round Of applause from his Repubcan coea se
when he predcea as result Of the m Of
| perity.
| MR. WHEELER LEADS IN OPPOSITION.
| Mr. Wheeler Dem. Ala opened the debate for
| the Democrats. cricisng the bill as the most
vicious and burdensome ever imposed the Amer
lean people. In particular he discussed the serious
| effect Of the measure on the laboring and agr-
cultural classes He referred to tie advance on
| sugar stock In the NewYork market to-day and
said this the clearest evidence Of the benefits
conferred on the Sugar Trust
| Mr.. Swanson (Dem Va a member OF the Ways
| and Means Committee. to whom Mr. Wheeler
yielded a portion Of his time. devoted his attention
10 assallng the sugar schedule agreed upon BY ihe
gave sugar double the proteetiSn received under
wo IN @ hs p pay1 G s
on sugar and said It would constitute tax Of 81
that was true then he said. the present schedule
the s santa i had been
House eonferrees had won a brilliant victory over
| the Senate on sugar and he had seen In the morn
| ing papers pictures Of the Speaker of the House.
| with the Sugar Trust crushed and bleeding under
| his feet. He then compared the two schedules
| chow that the duty on refined sugar in the Senate
| schedule and the schedule were exactly the
same. and he figured out that the trust would re-
ceive dirercntial 82-degrees sugar Uhe average
! Of sugars imported) Of cents per hundred pounds
more than the House schedule The Senate sur
| the victory the House had won He challenged
| contradiction. Mr.. Swanson said that Mr.. John
against the conference report the sugar schedule
| agreed upon gave the trust more protection than
| tho House schedule. He produced figures In sup
port Of his contention that it did. He figured out
| differential for the refner average sugars
under the present law when in competition with
| German sugars 0he only sugars which completely
| proposed schedule of asa certs
| I'VE might be mistaken here" continued Mr.