Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1897-02-24

VoU ALE HEREBY REQUIRED TO AP.
Il pear IN an action brought aga nst you
" me above named painful Ia the District
Court OF the ihird Judicial District OF tue
Slatc OF utnh, and to answer tho complaint
ilod therein within len days exclusive OF tho
day OF -erViccl after the service on you OF
this Hunmons-if served within this county,
OF. II served ont OF this county, but IN This dis
ulct vi hin twenty uhys. Otherwise within
forty days--or judgment by dets ult Will DO
hkeh agAinst you. according 10 the prayer or
hulq complaint.
The said action IA brought TO have Judgment
against the defendant tor tue sum OF SZ5s.lt
prlncpai ana interest thereon on az ihe fhto
OF per cent per annum from ana since june
20 1880, lees 81 paid august ~ 1875, pad
August q, 1855, S,iO PAID August 81, 1870, q
paid september 7. leg5, and 20 30 paid october
I, lhJl h or $50 attorneys fees and costs OF
SUIT; alleged TO be due ho plaintiffs from the
defendant, Hugh n. Arnold, upon certain
pr9m.ssory noe, executed by nc ssid
defendant, arnold. to tho plant ne,
for the sum of s2Hli, Que IN one
year after date, Will interest ut
per cent per annum; tho same being due
and wholly unpaid. Save and except the sums
MS above set forth. bong secured by mort
guge 81 even dAte herewith on the promises
hereinafter described, executed 10y the de-
PENDANT. Hugh a. Arnold, and his wife susan
Arnold, to the PLAINTIFF that these plaintiffs
are the lawful owners and holders OF SAID note
and mortgage, that by the terms OF said mort
gage the Hbeye named defendant Hugh a.
Arnold. agreed to pay a reasonable attorneys
Zee, To have the usual decree OF thus court for
tao fOIeciosure OF sara mortgage. and the sale
of said premises. adiuiging the ptocceds OF
SAID sale may be applied 10 the payment of the
amount found due 10 these plaintiffs, after the
payment OF the Goals Of tho GU I, and eN.
prnsCB OF the sale, that defendants, and all
persons c lainlng under them, he barred and
fureciosed OF NIL claim or equity OF redemption
IN Aaid premlseE, and every part thereof that
plaintiffs have judgment aud execution against
the said defendant, Hugh a, Arnold, for any
deficiency which uiay remain after applying
all he proceeds OF the sale Of saiu
premises properly applicable to the
satisfaction OF taid iudgment That
The plaintiff or any party to TINS suit may he.
come a purchaser at said salt. that the sheriff
execute deed to the purchaser; that the pur.
chaser be let into possession II said premises
on production of the sherid's deed therefor;
and that the plaintiffs have such other and
further relief in the premises rs TO this court
may seem juet and equitable.
Snid premises arc DESCRIBED as follows; Lots
ntty-one cd hfty.two (52) IN Block three ta)
In Central Park subdivision OF Lots !, and
and 10 IN block 81. Ten Acre FIAT "a" Big
Field survey. Same bel gsituate in Salt Lake
CITY and county. utah.
And you are hereby notified that II You fail
to appear and answer the said complaint
as above required, the snih plaintiff will apply
TO th1 court for tho relief demanded therein.
Mltness tho Honorable Nudgos, ami the seal
OF the District Court OF the Third Jul
dicial District, In and for the state of
lsEALl Utah this g2nd day of January. in
the year OF our Lord one thousand
eight hundred and ninety-seyen
DAVID c. DUNBAR, Clerk,
BY GRO. u. Loosus, Deputy CLERK.