Evening journal., 1897-11-03
NEW CASES FOR TRIAL.
BUSINESS WHICH THE SUPERIOR
COURT WILL HAVE TO DISPOSE
OF IN SOME MANNER.

OF IN SOME MANNER.
The new cases which appear ON the
trial list Of the Superior Court for the
approaching November term are as fol-
lows.
Henry B. Duncan. surviving partner
etc, VS.. Paul Gillls; Charles f. Walther
VS.. Massachusetts, Benefit Life Associa-
tion, Walter E. Seal VS.. George b. Chad
wick, etc; the Young and Fulton Lum-
Der Company VS.. Harlan Cause, Jesse
Scott VS.. w. & N. r. r. Co, Harry En-
mons vs.. Home Insurance Company.
John B. Taylor VS.. the Trustees of the
Poor, etc. William H. Money VS.. Court
land f. Crockett, constable; Mich
ael Breger VS.. Patrick Fahev
Ida ]. Todd VS.. Daniel w. Cush. John
w. Mccall VS. p, w. & b. r. r. Co.,
Stephen A. Neister VS.. B. l& p. II. r. Co.
James Nedery VS. B. & p. r. r. Co.,
Alexander Maxwell VS. Massachusetts
Benefit Association, John FINER & Bro.
VS.. Quigley & Mullen, James Stewart
VS.. B. & p. R. r. Co, John c. Elliott VS..
the Wilmington City Railway Com
pany, Joseph l.. Polk VS.. the Mayor and
Council of Wilmington, William H.
Klair VS.. Wilson Barnard, Iron Belt
Mercantile Company VS.. Thomas Nc
Corkle, Eliza Harris VS.. B. & p. r.. .R.
Co., Frank TORY VS.. John Edward Ad-
dicks, Elizabeth G. Staats vs.. Court
land Crockett, constable; Mary Alice
Creswell, widow, ETC., VS.. w. & N. r. r.
J Co., Martha r. Janyier VS.. p, w. & B.
r. r. Co., Mary Ella Smyth VS.. the Will
mington City Railway Company, Lin
ton Smith VS.. Seth A. Feaster, ct al.,. as
sociated as First District Committee of
Republican party; Mary e. Chandler
VS.. Richard B. Duncan's executor, Will
liam l.. Budd VS.. the Wilmington City
Railway Company, Sarah E. Cannon
VS.. p. w. & B. r. r. Co, Maggie Will
son vs. Massachusetts, Benefit Life AS
soeiation, Simon Wachstein VS.. f. Blu
menthal e Co., John SPAIN. d. b. a., VS..
Anton Whitman, p. b. r; d. Elias An
derson VS.. Richard Rowe, casual ejec-
tor and James Wright. ct al; Frank A.
/ Mitchell VS.. Richard J. Guthrie, ct al /;
Sarah Ann Springer VS.. Charles Green,
bailiff; James M. Bartlett VS.. Diamond
State Iron Company. James A. Kelly
VS.. the Republican Printing and Pub
fishing Company. William f. Pretty
man VS.. Edwin B. Williamson, Miriam
! Glinowiecki VS.. Liebig Manufacturing
Company, George S. Allmon, d. b. a..
VS.. Andrew b. Jones, p. b. r.; Thomas
/ T.. Shea, d. b. a., VS.. Agnes Kerr, D. b.
r. Peoples Foundry Company, d. b. a..
VS.. Harry Fairbanks, etc, p. b. r; viii.
liam c. Ellis, d. b. a.. VS. Charles
Wicks, D. b. r.; Mahlon B, Foster, d. b
a.. VS. Edward II. Brennan, p. b. r.;
Walter Burris, d. b. a., VS.. Michae'
4 Breger. p. b. r.; Thomas Roberts Stew.
ems Company. p. b. a., VS.. Ada V. Clea
yer, d. b. r.. Annie e. Bach, d. b. a., VS.
Benjamin F. Shaw Company, p. b. r..
Richard II. Lodge. p. b. a., VS.. A. L
Ainscow & Co., d. b. r.; Frank A. Chap
man, d. b. a.. vs. Hogan e Co., D. b. r.
Catharine McIntire d. b. al, VS. ID. w
: Lynch & Co., p. b. r.. the Prudential
Insurance Company, d. b. a.. VS.. Ann;
Carrall, p. b. r.: William G.. Beck, ct al.
d. b. a.. VS.. William e. Carrell p. b. r.
John D. Connally, d. b. A., VS. McCon
nell '&sRobinson, p. b. T.; Hodson & Co.
d. b. a.. VS.. George A. Wolf, y. b. r
Martin Brown VS. III. & f Brewing
Company. Martin Brown, d. b. a., VS.. II
& F. Brewing Company, p. b. r.; Jane
p. Stdham. d. b. a.. VS.. Thomas r
Rcney, p.eb. r.; John M Solomon VS.
Henry P. Cannon, garnishee; the PENN
sula Lumber Co. VS.. Henry p. Cannon
garnishee; the Union National Banl
I. vs. William c. Tindall, garnishee
same VS.. same, the Union Nationa
Bank VS. Charles III. Tindall: same vS
same; the Union National Bank VS..
S. Adams, garnishee; same VS.. same.