The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1896-02-15
MARY WANTS TO QUIT
She Asks for a Divorce From Botwick
and His Aliases.
HUGHES ENCOUNTERS A SNAG
Another Old Account Against
Boyce Rose VS.. Rose Young
Burglars Case-Set for Hear
ing in Both apartments. d.

Mary Botwick, the woman who was
kicked and beaten by her husband,
Mike Botwick. alias Matt Ledow, alias
John Ladusky, few nights ago ana
then retalated by charging him with
blowing up the residence of Martin
Buckley at Basin, yesterday commenc-
ed a suit for divorce against the 20
lander of various names. In her COM
plaint she recites that they were mar
ried at Hull, England, April i, 1891, ana
that the defendants true name is Mike
Rotwick, but that he assumed other
names when he came to Montana.
There are two children, a girl, years
old and a boy of ?. She charges that
he treated her with extreme cruelty
About a month after their marriage ne
used vile and abusive language TO her
and threatened to beat and XIII her.
During 1898, while they We're living at
Gem Idaho, he kicked and beat her
and threatened to kill her. He called
| her indecent names and falsely accused
| her of adultery. Last Tuesday, at their
| home in Butte he knocked her down
| struck her on the head with his fists
| and kicked her and threatened TO strike
| her with a piece of stove wood. She al
so SAYS he circulated slanderous stories
| concerning her and caused them TO re
| published. She asks for divorce ana
| the CUSTODY Oh the lNO
| tison & Naughten are her attorneys.
| Ludlow has evidently left the city,
| for he could not be found yesterday
| when the officers tried to serve the
summons on him. 1t is said he left
| town Thursday evening.
The defendants in the case of p. 5.
| Hughes against Toole & Twohy yester-
day filed their answer to the suit for
S7436O alleged to be due for labor ana
teams furnished between oct. and
Dec. 10, 1894, on the B., A Il p. railroad.
The answer denies the Indebtedness,
and sets up as a counter claim that on
July /, 1885, at Hughes request, the
| defendants paid out to various persons,
for his benefit 81 1925, which he agreed
to repay, but which he afterwards re-
fused to do, and Judgment for the
amount is asked against him.
In the case of Charles Quinn against
Bernard Quinn, the complainant hled
a motion yesterday to adopt the md
ings of the referee and for Judgment In
accordance with them. The defendant
also filed a motion TO set ASIDE the
findings for a new trial on the grounds
OF newly discovered evidence lhsull.
cheney of the evidence to JUSTIFY the
r verdict and findings of the referee anC
errors of law occurring at the trial anC
n | excepted to by the defendant.
. The John V. Farwell company yester
day commenced an action against j. X
! BOYce, IT., TOT e5,&UU anu iiiNNiNSN -
per cent from Feb. Is, 1891, claimed Il
; ! be due on an account of goods sold q
j. r. Boyce. jr., * Co.
In the divorce case of Estella Ros'
against william Rose, an affidavit 10
the publication of summons was nice
yesterday, alleging that the deIeIludIt
. | last place of residence in Montana wa
in Helena, but that he left the state
:, and is now living in jamestown, y. II
= The cases of the kid burglars, Hill an,
Montgomery, were continued uhl
Monday, and the ticket broker case Q
e Silas Newberger was vacated 10 aWai
! the result of a similar case pending l
2 the supreme court.
r The following matters are set TO
r. hearing in Department l. this mornlht
l. The trial calendar will not be calico
" but the present settings will be real
~ ranged: Estate of William }. Hutcr
!, ines petition for letters of adminlstra
ton: estate of ]. ID. Shaffer petitio
for same: estate of c. b. Houser. SCI
~ Element of final account; estate OF WI
- liam Harris, petition of John Dunsta
- and Elizabeth Williams for release frol
y administrators bond; estate OF Dam
/. Harris settlement of account; Mil
n ME O'Rrien VS.. NJ. ]. O'Brien, plaiI
+ tiffs' proofs; Charles BerEstrandt V
IN Sophia Bergstrandt. motion for alim'
or ny pendente lite; Billings Sand Stoi
company VS.. Il. J.. Frank et al. d.
ne 0uFrpr; NJ. j. Mc0une W. II.
at Frank. demurrer: John Eakins VS..
e L. Frank ct al, demurrer; Fam
at Matuzwitz vs. Citizens District Me
senger and Burglar Alarm Telegram
err company, motion for new trial; JOSEF
nd I.ayoIe VS. Louise Lavoie. plaintin
In proofs: Thomas Ford VS.. j. II. Savil
2 motion to dismiss; Bertha Pincus y
A. Pincus; motion TO produce book
- John Lamuth VS.. Barbara Lamut
te motion; John O'Rourke VS.. Ma
Schultz, motion to strike amended col
- plant, B. +. Jacobs VS.. w. W. Adar
% ct AL motion TO file amended answ'
Department IL, 10 a. m.-State
Montana VS.. George Howard, Fra
White. Clinton Hobbs, Frank Smit
ng John Kenna, for sentence; state
2oc Montana VS.. Eugene Sullivan, to a
ur pear; Gilligan VS.. Gillgan, plaintiff
ss' proofs; First National bank VS.. A
m derson ct al, motion to dissolve attac
ment: A. Ward vs.. John Ward. {
1re murrer; Quinn VS.. Quinn. motion
'ge judgment; Adam Farraday VS.. |
id- Farraday, demurrer.