The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1896-09-29

I
tSsa-F L. Hood We. Dora Moore; set for
isse-F +. Hood vs.. Dora Moore; SCI for
ISL II Ruby vs.. Mrs Mary Quinlan:
! continued nv o'rratiOn Of law.
| iS4,-s swintori. assirnee ". Mrs. j.
| Edwards, settled and dismissed
iSi'-s g. Relish ". J. ". Coleman: con-
4Si,- Ma 'onal Reaniug comrany vs. Crys,,
! ,al Strings Lumber company. continued
ssie- peaiy 6 Baker rs. J. s Dourhrty
| continued bv oporau11 of law.
1.amsns continued bv opera' on or law.
iSts T. Swinfo~1. 4seigncr. Ns G. W.
| sunthym. continued hv oneration Of law.
COUNTY COURT
John Tomfhorie VS.. Morley x Lidwell:
sort nued generally.
John ro'niaorie vs.. Mayer Aidern!er
John V. FArwel < CO. ". HozwassoI
Bros. It al. sequestration; continued gen
iiayn and Newbauer Bros. VS.. G. T..
Graham. dismissed for want Of prosecu-
ton
Mrs e. Shovelin vs. G. NJ and Louis La
Noue. for possession Of personal prop
erty. dismissed for want OF prosecution.
1. IS Bia. IS. La Pcrte. Houston an
Ar'fnsru Bailway company. debt, judS
ncnt fpr plant for SSiiHl.
Wright & Taylor vs.. Col man 4 Schultz
ana J. ~ Xeiglsr debt. continued for ser.
vice.
A E. Lincoln VS.. Mrs +. Harrington e.,
al. appeal. continued generally.
W. t. Whitney Us. Henry rreund. debt:
dismisscl tor want OF prosecution.
The Southern Manufacturing company
vs.. !. NJ ODDS. Debt: dismis sed fer want OF
prosecution.
Bank Of Commerce vs. Martin Henry ct
al sur on note. continued gtncrnlly
Eorchard. Brashear x Co. ". Louis \
ni7 II al. sequestraton; continued
for service
60 sor Sewall & GO. vs.. H. 4. Thorn
tor 90 al, sequestration; continued fol
] " Edwards vs b +. Hughes, gar.
nishee; continued generally,
j. ". Edwards ". Bayou city Lumber
ccmplny continued ronc-ally
j. X. H.nlacks ". Il. fl. Josey appeal
luiEmen for plaIrin for amount sued
- - which dcfcndlnt cNceurs.
Covl" 4 Sargent vs. Halt & Newbauel
Bro attachment; dismissed ror want o.
r. D. Gribhle & Co. Va. A. Christensen
Ehinlsh.e. continued generally.
us schmidt vs. James a. Baker Jr
and e. f. Schmidt, executors. garnish-
ment continued generally.
J. y Ellis ". T. t.. lIhl, debt; dis
mi ssed for want of prosecution.
"ashburn * Thoen Manufacturing com
CONTINUED generally.
Wasnoprn q Then Manufacturing com
pany ~ T. w; Waller, punishment, con
Houston lee and Brewing company vs.
MaN koeprick aItacnme-t m1,iGn to
quhsh attachment overruiei. continued by
defendant.
y Miller W. Mrs Hattie Eyerts. attacA
mrht: continued generally
h"rl"s Mahutacturing company VS. Hen
gen 4 Iiipp. debt. continued for seryicc
licuston Land and Trust company V
70" ~ r. g. Wilson, debit Judgment fn7
planuff for $40 Is. with stay OF eycct.-
con for ninety days
Carrie Balley 81 al Va. j V Meeks Z,
al, 70 seul- guardians account. cmtin.
ued 10y defendant
John J. Foley vs. Charles Rourrass et
al contract continued 10y defendant ana
set for FIRST day Of next tcGnl.
lhc Tui'r Iron Works rs. bundle. Arm,
'stedd \ tr0nau, debt and attachment;
ccnitucd & n"rsily
mr. 1uaer lrou Works w. william
CHRISTIAN. sarnshee: continued generally
appeal Judgment for pla.ntu Tor poses
sion of property sued for, writ OF posse
siCn n,o' - issue iii oct7hei l.
ArmiStcad cronan. deb dismissed a
20 ". II Armi>tead aud judgment agains
Hctcnlalrs pumbic and ttruen aHa u
firm OF Dumble Armlstead 4 Cronan 70,
$-Gi0i and costs
Gurlork Packing compan, vs.. W. A.
tle Vc.nnd sarnish"e, scr for octoh q
Tudor Iron Works vs., Bcring. Corte.
Hardware company, garn.snce conuaue.
y. Berng & Bro. VS.. Hicks Day Lumoe
e. 1910 nr lot COM IA
Thomas Roache VS.. ii. Mastcrson an,
" g, Nagicy, appeal, continued ge!.r
y r Lincoln vs. cora Allen ct al. an
peal: continued generally.
Ih cnix Lumber company vs.. David Tri
hon ci AZ, 49,. continued .gcncrallN
Thco. Keller ". james Kennedy, ga.
rishee; dismissed at palntin's cost
ttrt goE zee and Brewing company We
Lena NJ. Koerrick, tria! right or prop
erty. Judgment for plaintiff for properr
i il. Han vs.. Western Union Telegraph