The San Francisco call., 1896-01-01

guilty, Peter. G. Yorke has cleared him. And
az gain he showed his teaching when he said the
editor OF the A. P A. magazine was 'ln jail.
He was never put in jail: -
Peter c.. Yorke made another blunder when.
he challenged Donald NJ. Ross. He will have.
though, to stand up andtake his medicine. In
the meantime the A. P. lis booming. And,
by the way, application cards may be- had at
the Patriot office. :: -.
= Priest Yorke has raved and ran ted and yelled
"l.lar; liar; YOU are O. liar" to his hearpS:con-
tent. Now; submit. these facts. state, Mr..
Editor, that the. oath of denial taken by d
Roman. Catholic priest, in the:seifse in qaes-.
tion, is Unreliable. :. =: :: -. - >.
In further: su ubstantiation OF my charges, L
cite the: two following Incidents: Wien 'Cardi-
nal Wiseman OF London took his .consecrntion.
oath the ~Rev. j. Cumming charged him with:
taking an oath 10 persecute heretics. Cardinal.
Wiseman deniedlt. Rev Mr.. Cumming obtained
two COPIES of the PQntifcate Romanum, CON-
taining the: Bishops: oath IN the original Latin
When these evidences we're prodnc ced THE Car
Ginal declared it was .not:1n his book and ran g.
bluff, Inviting Rev: Mr. Gum mingt cofne:to his,
house, and examine his book. DIR. Cumming,
accompanied. by a:friend, went to the Cardt-
nal's house and requested to hayethe P0ntlti.:
:cste Shown to him, thathe might point out the:
persecuting clause. *.::.:. =. - .
" The Cardinal could not refuse, and when
Cnmming opened it he found: the, passage
crossed off with the ink scarcely dry. Such is
the method of a Roman priest: -: :. >::* ::
+: In the debate between Bishop Purcell and
A: Campbell, in Cino oinnati in1 S377, the Bishop:
admitted the oath with the clause: in as mem
toned above: by sufste ntfally ly.:saying that
other countries, made no: com plaint and. the.
Gnited StateS had nothing 1ofear. = ~:
. Now,:tf such is. the evidence in the above
cases " hat is the value OF j tdayit to
the contrarY%at thiS:tlme in: this case?
= tInthe celebrat ed"debate between. A leXander:
Campbell and Bishop Purcell in Gin GiI1liai j II:
S3f, Mr. Cam pbe]l quoted the following from.
mat 69ok OF au thorityin the: olnall. Catholic
chuEch known as the moral aTheol0gy:..o OF
Al phenSp dc LigoriO5'.:: " :@|:: ~ ~. :.
r .:.HA tshop however poor. he may be; *cannot.
approprlate TO .himselt pecuniary nes. wi thout
1.-The: e:HcenSe of.the Apdst0lic:See: But he-ought
TO apply them to:pi0us:uses.:: Much less can he
GpPly those>ines. to- any else hut -piouS:
uses which the Council OF Irent:has laid upon
nou-reSld ent clergyInen orsItpon tl40ses 81
men Nho.keeP: eoneubines $. goTi@:Ep: Doc.
Mor,s p:, A <:
+ This Bishop Purcell: denied, and before the:
andlence called :on: eaNen: and earth to wit:
ness that said passage: could not be: found i NJ
said q thority. his was. found. as stated by
MI : Cam PbelE This shows: what. re lance: can
*be placed upon the denial:ef q: :Ro man priest;
and has adiTect bea ring upon the denials OF p.
e. Yorke and his Jesuit followings+. +.
To show further why the>@Iesuft is no good
we; submit The following Roman Catholic.
authorities. r: -. - g.. -
+" Anthony Escobar- -Unigersas -Theologia:Mor-
alisfeeeptioreS alSque lite sen tentla; nee non:
pIoblemRticR disq uisftiohesi ToInns iugdu duni, }:
1852. ed. BiblAcad. Nant.) q A man of re
.ligi0us orderj:w no for a short time lays aside
his habit for a sinful: purpose, :, is free from:
heiIloms*sfn~ and does not incur the penal ty of
communication lib iii; sec. 2,:::probE A +
n. 212: IT,. .<:F ~:
lie Moyn Propositions, extraites des. cash:
iers dicIes>a au college" "a AuXen par.1e Frere
,LeMoyre;J esuite, et::censnrees dams l.Ordon-:
name ct tInstructfon::P p astorafe de NJ: l'EYeQue
d Auxene. du IS:Septem bre, i 725: ga Chris:
tian ting elibera may act precisely.as a.
man: and FAY aside:the Character OF theGhris.=
+ Etianman*i In actions which are not properly:
those of a Christian H. lie Moyne; Lib. fi,sde
Act: Hum. C. Il. sec. rt. 1, Obi. j. =:
+ Perjury IL fflg; False witness Tho1nas san
chez: Opus: Morale in :Pr5ecepfaf: Deealogl,
Nenetiis, 16l4 AntFerplaa; 1924. Ed. .:ColE;
Sion.j. tHe who may conceal goods which* he
requires for the: -snstenance Of life les t:they:
should be seized by his creditors and himself
reduced to- beggary may: sw ar; when he is: :ex-
amfned blythe Judge, that he has no c0hcealed
goods. And theyswho are privy to i t:riay swear
tothe same thin g..'In Praaeept:i)ecal: PaTS: Ii
Lib. Hi;.c g., n. IL. ~: .:.
%;'lWhen a man:who has trul Y or feignedly prom
ised Inarfiage:is, for: some reason, free from
the obiig atlon: of fulfilling his promise, he may
swear. when requiredj that. he did not promise
a probable opinion; he may think be: is mot
bound, wi tn a:Sate* conscience .''==II Pr@eepts
Decsl. Pars: ii lib. iii; C. 81; n. 3322.... -:
Aman who:is urged.to take a. woman for his
wife. when he is not compelled to- marry ma ay
swear that he:Will take her, by understanding;
within. him sci II lam obliged, orif sheshould
afterwards please me. = Ibid, n 80 :.: =: -* :.
80 eWo uld not sin. aortally y Who; influenced
by his reverence : for Jan, oath, :*and= from
scruple, should: :feignto swear SO that the by
:standersand the notary might think that he
l.
:: Leonard Iessius-De-J ustife ct JuTe. Parisiis
l. 1923. : *Antverpi5e, I62I:.(Ed. Coil Sioil) The
i:witneSs and THE accused are not Obliged to-
answer: according to" the meaning Of: the
<zLi b.: Ii, :c::31, dnb3 g. n IA =: =:
l.: Francis Amicus--CurSus Theologica.* Tomus:
EI. Duaei, 1912. ttae who has stolen to a con-
siderable amount is not obliged under pain of
mortal sin TO restore" the: whole. .''-Disp. 38,
sec:.4, n: -. -.
= Homiclde: Henry. Henfiquez . s 1nm;e
.Theologla Moralis,,. ToInus:.i Nenitiis, 1000.
Call fjli1ltprpr oh
he should be. AN :eceesia tic. rejecting upon
the danger, has: entered the house .-of an
adulteress, and being. attacked by her husband
kills hls+aggressor, IN the necessary: defense OF
his life or his limbs, he is not considered it,:
regular Rib: xiy, de Irregularftate, c. 10,
sec. 3: s.. 80 <.*:s
t. Francis Amicus-C -Cursus. .Theolog ica: 'Tomuss
v. Duacf, 1642.s: twill be- lawful for an &C..
I+clesiastic or of are ligious order TO kill a
cal I'm niator who threatens to spread atrocious
accusations againsth religion" Ibid, n. II s.:
George G0bat--Operum. M0raliuIn. Tom: ii !:
! Duaci, 17Q0l. Father Fagundez, in -Decal:1ib.:
ix-thus expresses himself lit iss Tawful:for:a
son to rejoice at the murder of:his parent COM
nitted by himself3n a state OF drylnkenness:on,
account of:the. gre&t-riches thence acquired by
l. inheritance: 1880 ~. =.
f.. Rose1ibauIn and Lacriox Theolngfa: Moralis
tnnnc .*pluribps partibus :aucta aa:R:.P. Claudio;
Lacri0x. Socetas Jesu.. C0loniaej. 1757.:*( (Co-
llonias Agrppinn, 1888. Ed MUS Brit t.: ITO
q seculartribunalis personal" prQfanation."---
Tom, ii, Lib iii, Pars1 TT. l, g. 2, Bub: H. 48;
| Resol.:1. = :. ;....:::. - =. -: -;
+: These. Secret Instructions devote much at
tention to the means of of%decoyfng: rich widows.
They sGv: 'The confessor must so: manage her
that. she will not do the least thing with out
+ his advice; that she. must"resort to frequent
;sacraments; because in that she#freeiy makes
the discovery of her most secret thoughts and.
every tenn ptation.', .t'Discourse must be made
| her concerning the advantages of widowhood;
and the: inconveniences of Wedlock. {.
will be proper: now and then. to- propose some:
match. to her, that >she is known to have an
a xrb fncE,p hoe.
posed to live in widownood, let her be led to
make . VOW of chas tity for two or three years:
at least that all tendencies to a second mar
rfage, and all conversation with men, even her
nearest relatives snd kinsfolk, m ,ist be for
:bidden under :pretense of closer union with,
God" ..:.: r.
| LET them renew their VOW. of chastity
| twice g. year.; they must ]: be :; visited
and treated with not too much se-
verify in confession; allow them whatever
pleasures they have an inclination to-. Let
women that are young and descended of noble
parents be placed with those widows under
vows that they may become accustomed to our;
directions; and let some woman be chosen by