San Antonio daily light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1886-1907, 1896-01-08
NEWS OF THE COURTS.

4 II
Judgment for plaintiff.
| w. III. Irwin VS.. j. ID. Smith, die
missed at plaintiffs cost.
Goodman & Pfeiffer VS.. S. A. st.
Ry. Co., appeal from justice court /;
plaintiffs motion to dismiss ap-
peal sustained.
Rosenwald & Well vs.. HI. Solin-
sky & CO., debt; judgment for
plaintiff.
Edwin Willis VS.. Anna Willis,
divorce; dismissed for want OF
prosecution.
The Ipswich Shoe Co. VS.. Hen
! rlotta Rhein eft AL, sequestratiOn (;
dismissed for want Of prosecution.
T. c.. Frost & Co. VS.. Annette NJ.
Dryer, Edward and Joseph e.
Dryer, on promissory note; dis
missed as to Annette M. Dryer;
Judgment against Edward and
Joseph f. Dryer. Defendants
gave notice Of appeal. Leave
given plaintiff to withdraw origi
nal note and deposit certified copy
| in lieu thereof.
james Raley VS.. j. III. Rea ct al,
appeal from Justice court; defend
ants motion to dismiss appeal sus-
tanned.
Annie Bee vs. Kate n. Robbins
ct al, on promissory note; judg-
ment for plaintiff against Kate n.
and w. w. Robbins and continued
as to executors,
CYRUS Il. Green VS.. w. B. Sham,
dismissal set aside.
Mirtle Holmes VS.. Irwin Holmes,
divorce; dismissal set aside.
w. E. Sessum vs.. Robert Sessum,
divorce; judgment for plaintiff.
F. Bachrach VS.. Edward tanner,
appeal from justice court; judg.
ment for plaintiff.
u. T. Nesbit vs.. executors OF es.
tate of 81. b. Adams, deceased, ct
al, motion to quash citation over.
ruled and defendants Tuttle, Went
worth and Bennett except, case
set for February 20.
The injunction cases OF Dan
Lewis ct al. vs.. F. N. Sanchez, M
Freeborn ct al. VS.. Joseph e. Het
tier, Ed. Dwyer ct al. VS.. Charles
zallmanzig, Henry Bennett ct al
We. j. G. Berry, w. A. Houston ct
al. We. w. j. Page, Charles Mierow
ct al. VS.. John F. Hansen were dis.
missed.
Antonio Vasquez vs. Juan Leal,
appeal from justice court; on trial.
FoRTY-FIFTH DISTRICT COURT.
Erich Menger VS.. G. r. Hass ct
al, to try title and for damages
dismissed at defendants cost.
N. Mackey VS.. City Of San Anto-
MO, damages; on trial.
NEW SUITS FILED.
Meerscheidt Bros. & Stiercn VS..
Charles Schneider, promissory
note, 81, $50, and foreclosure of lien
on part OF lot q and all of lot :,
block s, B, on Omaha street.
l.. p. Peck & Co. vs. j. E. Hamil-
ton ct al, debt, $91.40, and seques-
trstion on household goods ia resi-
dence on Presa street.
NoOhi VT SLNiL Al Il IAl1c'
Affirmed-Temple Oil Manufac-
turing and Refining Co., VS.. the
Van Wrinkle Gin and Machinery
Co., from Dallas; J. A. Grant VS..
VIM. Reavis, from Ellis; w. A. j.
McCollum VS.. Wood & Kinkead,
from Collin; g. T. & n. w. Ry.
Co., VS.. w. B. Bush, from Ellis.
Reversed and. remanded-Wm
r. Cook VS.. First National bank Of
Grsnbury, from Tarranr; Il. & P.
Ry. Co., vs., the Llano Live Stock
Co., from Tarrsnt; B. F. Fox VS.. J.
d. Elston, from kaufman; T. l.
Waugh vs.. j. F. Dabney, from
Johnson NJ. X. & T. Ry. Co., vs..
Pat Spellman, from Tarrant.
Motions granted-German Insur.
ance Co. vs. Ely & Walker Dry
Goods Co., from Dallas, to dismiss
appeal G. NJ. Blackmare ct al. vs..
J. NJ. Harry ct al, from Dallas, to
dismiss writ OF error; III. s. Wilson
VS.. G. @. Manning, from Dallas, to
postpone su admission to January %.
| Motions oyerruled - Oakland
Home Insurance Co. vs. w. f.
Davis ct al, from Tarrant, for re-
hearing; city OF Vernon VS.. r. +
Montgomery, from Tarrant, for re-
hearing; Louis Otto ct al. VS.. M
Half & Bro, from Bexar, for re-
hearing; J. M. Fletcher ct al. VS.
National Cash Register Co., from
johnson, for rehearing; G. w
Gears We. Eva G. Scott, ct al, from
Bosque, for rehearing; s. X. Ry.
Co. of Texas VS.. Mark Laffoon et
al, from Tarrant, for rehearing
Edwards county VS.. Ike H. Jen
neys OF al, from Edward, for re-