The Ravalli Republican. [volume] (Stevensville, Mont.) 1894-1899, 1896-09-23

2lt C1lbertson & Co, " q
2l5 G + Whitcsctt. lumber for roads, :ls 4!
al9 ] r DcNnycr, lumber for roadS, -
so John Mciaugllin, blncksmithing, s
2u; j j, Walker work on roads, 32 W
H,9 NJ NJ Co, corvallis, supplies lof roadS, -
2:W William cameron, road work. l5 ~ ~
2}l J " Tabor, road work. y m oo
2}2 Eclch, road WORK, w
Claim No. 81, in favor OF James
Shannon, was disallowcd in the sum
of three dollars, because the charges
a! s!!cy'ea e! hH law law &c: such such services was
excessive that amount. -.......
Claim No. IS, in favor Of r.
Gwinn, for medical attendance on
paupcr, was disallowcd in the sum Of
S2S. for the reason that the board
considered the charges excessive.
Claim No. GG, in favor 0f Il. B.
OWingS, for medical attendance on
paupcr. for the sum Of $40, was re-
| jectcd foT the reason that the SER
vices were unauthorized.
Claim No. 81, in favor of W. b.
Harlan, for special work on the Como
bridge was reduced in the sum OF one
dollar, because excessive.
Claim No. IS, in favor Of J. T..
Bricc, for medical attendance on
paupcr, was disalloWcd in the sum OF
s24, for the reason that the BOARD
considered the charges excessive.
Claim No. 7G, in favor OF II. W.
Odcl], was disalloWed' in the sum OF
S2S, BECAUSE the charges were consld-
cred excessive.
Claim No. 02, in favor Of Thomas
D<11 C11nnrN)Cht
Of road district No. 3, was disalloWcc
in the sum of $4.15 because the
charges were not properly itemlzcd.
Claim No. 109, in favor Of B. r.
Smvthe, for witness before justice
court, was rejected, for reason that
payment Of the same WAS prohibited
by law.
Claim No. 1l2, in favor Of r.. B
Owings. for medical attendance on
paupcr, was disallowcd in the sum OF
S12.5O, for the reason that charges
were considered excessive.
Claim No. 122, in favor or N. E'
,, Wilkcrson, as supervisor Of road dis.
) trict No. 5, was dsallowed in tIl(
sum Of $1,000, because the charges
for like service were excessive, a:
; scheduled by the board.
Claim No. 146, in favor Of Albcr
} Hammond, for services as spccla
constable, was rejected for the rca
, son that charges were not propcrl'
) itcmized, and the board could not dc
. tcrmine the correctness Of the Sal(
D charges.
Q Claim No. 1856, in favor Of j. A
9 Hcrscman, for hauling lumber TO
roads, was disallowcd in the sum 0
= 81 90, because the charge was consd
. cred excessive in that amount.
Claim No. 173, in favor Of j. Foust
= for work on the Stcvensville count
n bridge, was disa]lowed in the sum O
5 49, .13, for the reason that it was con
70 sidcrcd excessive.
5 Claim No. 1913, in favor of Ann
% Mckenzie, for $500: as damages 10
% killing horse on the public high
" " way. was rejected for the reason tina
. the county was not liable therefor
y Claim No. 200, in faver Of the a
. G. NJ. Co., for supplies furnished roa
~ ~ districts, was disallowed in the SUI
20 Of S5.6S, for the reason that tn
n n charges were considered excessive.
10 Claim No. II, in favor Of A. Grill
ben, for the sum Of $5l.57, as a r.
'o bate on taxes, was rejected, for IT,
Is reason that the same was Incorrect.
~ Claim No. 81. in favor of Hem
90 90 Smith, fol So. 90. services for spcci
% road work, was laid over Until tt
o0 9 regular December session for farth'
rs Investigation.
80 80 Claim no. 207, in favor OF Jam
90 90 Rawlins, for $3.50, damages for
90 horse injured on the public road, W
le laid over until the next regular SC
is sion. for investigation.
Adjourned.
SECOND DAY.
IT l,or L. SOC