Middlebury register. (Middlebury, Vt.) 1886-1937, 1896-05-01
CrArE OF VERMONT, ADDISON coUN
The National Life Insurance
Company

The NatlOnal l.l1e insurance
Company
Winfield y. sattley, May E.
Sattley. Marshall A. Sattley, To the Court
Frances G. Sattley, Elmer &. of ChanccIy in
Sattley Ida \ewlock SattleY, said County.
Robert G. Sattley, Jennie
NJ. Sattley, Henry B. stokes
and the Manhattan Life In
suIancc company.
The National Lite Insurance company,
corporation organized and doing business
under the laws OF the state OF Vermont, with
its principal Office at Montpelier, IN the
county OF Washington and State OF Vermont,
brings this its bill OF complaint against Win
field n. Sattlcy and May +. Sattley, his wife,
OF Chicago in the county of Cook and state of
Illinois, Marshall A. Sattlty and Frances {.
Sattley, his wife, of Los Angeles in the coun-
ty OF Los Angeles and state OF California,
Elmer G. Sattey and Ida Newlock Sattley, his
wife, OF Kansas City, in the county OF jackson
and State OF Missouri, Robert G.. Sattlev and
Jennie VI. Sattley, his wife, OF Dixon IN the
county OF Lee and state OF Illinois, Henry u.
Stokes, president OF the Manhattan Lite In
surance company OF New York, in the county
aud state OF New York, and the Manhattan
Life Insurance company, II corporation OF
ganized and doing business underline lave OF
the State OF New York. with its principal
office at New York in the county and state
of New York, ana thereupon complains ana
says;
That the SAID Winfield y. sattley, Marshall
a. Sattey, Elmer G. Sattley and Robert Z.
Sattley, on the 10th day of January, lSS9, eX-
ecuted IA mortgaH to said petitioner with
condition tor the redemption OF the same on
the payment OF certain notes Il erein de
scribed. The lands in said mortgage are de-
scribed as follows, and are situate in Ferris
Durgh In said county
Being the land and premises conveyed TO
the said grantors by the said The National
| Lite Insurance Company by Its deed dated
january 10, lss9, and being the land and prem
Uses upon which the said company obtained
decree of foreclosure IN the Court of Chancery
within ana for the county OF Washington at
Its September term, lSS!, which decree OF
/ foreclosure Is recorded in the land records in
the said town OF Ferrisburgh i'm book 20,
pages 21i and 20 and enrolled In the chan
/ Gerry records of said court OF 1851, i'm Volume
/ 9, page 81. said decree was against Robert
Il. SattleY ana others, and was upon the
premises conveyed to said Robert =. SatileY
/ by Abr I'M SattlcN by deed dated December
/ 10, lSS, recorded IN volume Il, page %, OF the
! Ferrisburgh land records ana by deed OF said
/ Abram SattlrY and wife dated April !, lSjS,
and recorded i'm Volume Il, page 100, OF said
Fcrrisburgh lane irecOrds, and reference Is
had to said decree and the enrolment and
record thereof, and the said deeds and the
records thereof Tor more particular descllp
ton
said mortgage was conditioned uron the
| payment OF said notes according TO their ten
| or, the payment OF all taxes and assessments
upon the granted premises to whOmsOeVer
/ laid or assessed, to keeping OF the buildings
thereon insured against fire i'm n sum not
/ less than Thirty tour Hundred Dollars tor the
/ benetit OF the grantee and its assigns. ANA in
/ default thereof or OF the payment OF taxes or
assessments, 10 pay all expenses which the
/ grantee should reasonably incur tor such in
/ suranCc, taxes or assessments, with annual
interest thereon: and upon iulhlment OF all
such conditions said deed was to be void
otherwise in full force.
And your orator says that but three of said
4 notes have been paid, and that tour OF said
notes are long overdue and unpaid. and that
/ the interest ON all OF said notes, excepting
/ those Just mentioned as having been paid, Is
/ long overdue and has not been paid since
! February LIST, 1884.
And your orator alleges (a) That the said
/ Robert G. Sattlcy and Jennie NJ. Sattley, his
/ wife, by quit claim deed dated January ,?
]
hereinbefore described To Winfield y. sat
tley; 90 That said Marshall \. Sattey
and Frances SattieY, his wife, by quit claim
deed dated January l2th 1888, conveyed their
right in the premises hereinbetOre described
10 said Elmer G. sattley; (c) That said Elmer
&. Sattley and Ida Newlock Sattley, his wife,
by warranty deed dated September llth, 1885,
conveyed said premises to said Winfield y.
SattleY; (d) Tn II the said Winfield y. Sattley
and May +. SattleY, his wife, bV mortgage
deed dated February 2Sth, 1884, conveyed sad
premises to said Henry Il. Stokes, president
OF The Manhattan Life Insurance Company,
TO secure the payment OF Twelve Thousand
Dollars, no mention beng made i'm said
mortgage OF any encumbrance upon sald
premises; (e) That said Winfield y. Sattley
and May +. Sattley, his wife, by warranty
deed lated November !, 1894, conveyed said
premises to the said Manhattan Lie Insur.
ance Company OF New York city, subject to a
certain mortgage described in said deed as
gwen to secure the sum OF Seven Thous-
and Dollars ana interest and praying
that said defendants may be foTeclosed
OF their equity OF redemption in said prem
ises.
said defendants residing without this
/ State, that said petition cannot be serv.
| ed upon them, II is ordered that they be
/ required to appear ON the first day of the
next stated term of said court to be holden
at Middlebury, within and for the county
! Addison, on the first Tuesday of June A. ID.
1896, then and there 20 answerto said petition,
and for that purpose said petitioner shall
cause TO be published the substance of SAID
petition and this order three weeks success
/ lively in the Middlebury REGISTER printed at
! Middlebury aforesaid. the last of which pub
locations TO be at least twenty day previous
| to SAID term OF said court
| Dated at Middlebury aforesaid this 23d day
| of April, A. ID. 1896.
RUFUS WAINWRIGHT, Clerk.
Dillingham;, Huse a Rowland,
solicitors for petitioner.