New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1896-03-13

wsh our coffee at breakfast, so they Wish tnelr
n rer the one as the other. When you a.
PRINT 70 pass this bill and thereby force one VINO
ght Of personal liberty One smiles at the picture
as he contempates Senator Raines caa .a az of
Farmer and assuming to speak for the ntereStS VI
waray The situation recalls the relnark OF Ros
Ccnklng once MADE at mpdo use Of the ex
preston that patriotism IS the ias' ne m1discov
coudre he was utterly Obvious Da ' If one can
orete the future by the haP S no law
Republican disaster and defeat in the uupeih'0''
contest OF 1896.
SPEAKER FISH PRAISES THE'blLh
Mr. Fish then took the floor. Yesterday ne hau
pleaded for the passage of a bill IN the 'h's'e =.
the laborlng people. To-day he was upon 'i'e 'o''
In the interest OF another bill which meant
reform The LIQUOR traffic had found mouthp'ece
In many newspapers but II had been of little avail
and the Republican party was about to place ,he
Ralnes bill upon the statute books Inc i.ap'e'
law would be the first In the United States. true
there were some timd members OF the majority WIN
had been found wanting Mr.. fish was M
r,n,ed after a few remarks ny Mr.. Donnely. VINO
osked him what had been the position or the fe-
publican party in New-York City with reference 10
the bill .
sneaker Fish was he said. glad that the youthtui
member from New-York had asked him Inc ques
ton Still II the gentleman from newborn hd'
grown to years Of discretion. he wouid K"o" '"a'
the Republican party IN New-York City had not
had the courage stand by It's convictions OF the
| condition In Ncw-York would now be vastly dii-
| ferent. Glepubican applauseJ
Mr. Coughlin Dem), OF Erie. interrup'eI '"e
sneaker 10 ask him what the Governor had said re-
gariing the Civil Service question. but MT. fish
| stated that II the gentleman did not have intein-
gence enough TO know for himself, the queSuo'
was not worth answering Speaker Fish cohuhueu.
The Republican Party has been PLEDGED 40 by
a fraudulent Democratic Legislature IN ~ ma. ma
10 the Democratic exchequer from the brewers and
| liquor dealers. venture TO say that "hcn We
the people viii be pleased with It's operations Ions
thu, not the Democratic party should IL ever
The distinguished features of the bill that We seek
~ F.rst-I, sb5shes ali excise boards. and removes
discretionary power from the Licensing ON nna Ia bv
restrictions upon the traffic that will largely dmin-
| sh the number Of saloons ,..., -.,..,,,,o =,
the state and consequer; reduction o; the ''S
RAJ FER years Boars Of Excise have been used as
political machine Licenses have been granted to
qySr; no ana vd 5ff IN the Srag of
| / would be the las, one In this House 70 vote ior
ess 'ipD wo afl mot have my supper, Dbl think the
Germans woull not get their per equliiy a. 80 a.
| they % row.
| Mr.. cain oDeniJ OF Brooklyn. asked for recogn!-
ton from the chair. and asked The Speaker why the
Republican party did not pass law restricting the
| liquor business
| Mr. Fish answered: why. the gentleman from
Rrooklyr ought to know all about such questions
a. that He is in the saloon business. think.
and Mr. cam sat down.
| Mr Fish concluded:
! apurchend tina, bu, little complaint Will be made
! other than from brewers vho IN many cases
s s,nies have k9owedgc--have objection. The re,
lcntlcss enforcement OF payment OF mortsasyS VIII
force thousands OF saioonkecpers to ne wal ana
outside OF the liquor traffic AMI It's benehcares be
no hn Dy TN that R increased revenue
needed by the state can win great hTopre'y come
from 'hGe ensaSed n the gugT ys control
While radical change, is one that il for the public
welfare AMI In The Interest OF the enforcement OF
| law oncias who owe their appointment TO 4: a
State department. rather than 10 local ooara %iIi
Revenue Department. free from local political In
| force the law rigidly and impartially
| THE VOTE ON FINAL PASSAGE
| A. the end OF Mr. Fish's speech Mr.. O'Grady
moved the previous question upon the motion OF
| Mr. Norton TO strike out the enacting clause
| Mr. Nixon who was in the chair evidently think
ing that the vote upon final passage OF the oil,
| allowed the clerk TO begin the calling Of the roll
| The clerk stopped In time, ana the Norton
| motion was put and lost.
| Mr. OGrady called for the roll. and again the
| clerk began calling on the final passage OF tho Dill
| The bill then passed by vote OF 81 TO So and the
| House adjourned until 10 o'clock tomorrow morn
| Ing The vote Nnal passage WAS Il lpHo"H.
| Ayes-Ablett Aids. Anderson. II. T. Andrews.
| Armstrong Audott. Austin. Bates. Bedel rondy
T. BROWN: =. p Brown BroTneIl, G Ga5S HnrT
| cole. Costello Cromwell Cutler Downs. Dudley
Edrds GGGd db. G9rna a Heron refis s
| ted Ives. Keenholts Kelsey: Kern Roster LIVING
L %@Sa@go Ma? Mssssr Me Mc x@n
| O't;rady' Perkins Post. Robbins. Rogers. Rounds
4 sch Siaa'r Sears. shsidon G. smith Springer
sswaG storm WSTner s~ Weed Ta W rSppfr w
son. Winne. Wtter. zimmerman and the speak
Nays-Adcr. p. J. Andrews. Babcock Barry.
| Rarth R.aisiel. Braun. Brennan. Butts. CAIN, Cor
r moar. J. <. ponne:ly. T. +, Donnely, Embey.
Finders. Finn. Fitzgerald. Forester; French, Fritz
Gallgan, Gledhii. Green; GudeT' Hart. Hi. Hon
T sa5ar l"e MaccaSs Mcceiian Mccoy McKeown
Myers Tstn1eh s MSRa9 scksnm N sm9h
| sprinewclcr. stah. stanchheld, Steiner. Tra!nor.
"Tbos" absent were: Ebbets QDcm) of Kings;
Goodman Hem1 OF Newf or cray Me TioS OF
m lInr Of New-York; q. ". Meyer DEM. of New
York and O. W wis9n tRep3, Of B s,,'S iyn n
Gratis against the bill: Adler. French. Ialmbeer
and Murphy of New-Yorki Babeock. of chsut ;.a
a qua; and Steiner Of Erie FREEMAN De
c;raw. Ferrestcr.. Hughes and Wasstan OF Kings
MEMBERS EXPLAIN THEIR VOTES
| A the names Of the members were called some OF
them particularly the Republicans who opposed the
| hill explained their votes. Mr.. Babcock. when his
name was cal.ed. began the explanations. The bill
uas not In the interest OF the Republican party.
81. had been asked to vote for II. but he could not
consistently do II against the interests OF
his constituents as 1t was against the Republican
.r,v and Mr. Babcock Interested In both.
Mr. brennan CRep). OF Kings the call stated
chat the bill was In violation Of every principle
| =, home rule He had not. he said ceased
- he a Republican. but as there was no popular
.'amanI FOR the bill he must vote against II. He
heiiayed In high license but could not that the
| Waincs Bill would give the people what they de-
rel in the line Of a higher license. over and above
ali MIR brennan could not vote for the bill. because
| hhis constituents did not wish him to.
h' MIR Wondy (RepJ. OF Syracuse said:
| ,Thcre IL no man on the floor OF this House who
| ,o,hted nv sincerity in opposition to this bill; there
~ M man cognizant of what did for its amend
.. ar II amendment we're impossible. then for
.lupn dnl hhut