St. Paul daily globe., 1896-04-08

man, executor, appellant.
ZS9 Michael E. Smith, appellant VS. Twin
o!sy aSy, Lime and Cement Company, respondent.
3ol: In re assignment of Lambert Bros.
u. r. Lambert ct AL appellants vs. Scan
olnavian-American Bank of st. Paul ct al,
respondents.
Duluth Railway Company, respondent.
3OS c. j. Hess, respondent vs. Adamant
Maaniufacturing ian Company, appellant.
304 James M. Raft respondent vs. New
england Furniture and Carpet Company, ap-
pellant.
SO5 Lake Phalen Land and Improvement
Company, respondent VS.. Rose Lindeke ct
SO6 F. D. Smith, respondent, vs. Emil
Munich, appellant.
30 Laura v. Truesdale, respondent, VS..
II. e. Sidle ct al, appellants. April 80.
S12 c. H. Smith insurance commissioner,
ct al, VS.. National Credit Insurance Com
pany ct al, respondents. May Is.
The following cases were disposed of yes
terday
9. D. N; Osborne Co, appellants, VS..
26. Louise E. Gale, respondent, VS.. George
N. Baxter, appellant. Submitted on briefs.
u. Samuel Grant appellant, VS.. Alice G.
Grant, respondent. Motion for aimony.
80. William S. Conrad respondent, VS.. ia
cob Dobmeer, appellant. Motion to affirm.
81. Historical Publishing Company, appel
liant, vs. George N. Lavaque, respondent. Sub
mitted on briefs.
40. Paul Golzian, respondent, VS.. Dora A.
Whitmarsh, appellant. Motion to affirm.
81; Maria H. Stewart respondent. VS.. Ina
NJ. Lofans appellant. Motion to dismiss.
II. Frank A. Day, appellant. VS.. H. NJ.
Blaisdell, respondent. Motion to affirm.
SO. James Donovan, respondent, vs. Emil
F. Sell. appellant Submitted on briefs.
147. Frederick A. Dunsmoor, respondent,
vs.. Anson B. Jackson, appellant Motion to
affirm.
1863. S. c. and Emma ]. Olmstead respond
ents, VS.. o. j. Firth ct al, appellants. Sub
mitted.
PSI. E. j. Wheeler, respondent, vs. F. A.
Paterson, receiver, appellant. Submitted.
Rhoy, respondent, August Johnson, defend
ant, appellant Motion to affirm.
Rcard S Of Tredway aPPesn VS. L. E.
The call for today is as follows:
Cases Set
H. Charles ]. Knox, appellant VS.. James
Meehan Jr. ct al, defendants James Meehan
Jr.. respondent.
25 New England Furniture and Carpet
Company, appellant, VS.. Sarah L. Bryant ct
al, respondents.
Motions
Sc. State of Minnesota, ex rel H. G. Tracey
appellant VS.. c. R. Cooley, auditor, respond
ent.
&c. State eX rel. Frank Thompson, VS. Pro-
bate Court of Rock County, respondent.
60. In re information and accusation for
willful misconduct-in his profession an
attorney at law VS.. C.. E. Brame, respond
ent
1s5; Halyor steenerson. appellant, vs.
Great Northern Railway Company defend
ant, Patrick Meehan ct al, intervenors and
respondents.
979S. David Tozer, in behalf, etc., appel
liant, VS.. j. c. O'Gorman, receiver, ct al, re-
spondents.
195. John w. Best respondent, vs. E. S.
Chittenden, appellant.
y 154, John P; Elmborg, appellant, vs., St.
Paul City Railway Company, respondent.
1875. James Farmer appellant, VS.. City Of
st. Paul ct al, respondents.
1893. Amelia E. Turton, respondent, VS..
Charles E. and Rina Herman, appellants
230. Union Bank of Rochester, respondent
VS.. L. L. May ct al, defendants, L. L. May,
appellant.
234. Charles A. Cornman, appellant, VS..
Charles X. Sidle ct al, respondents.