Richmond dispatch. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1884-1903, 1896-11-11
APPELLATE COURT IN SESSION.
A Large Number of Opinions Handed
Down Yesterday.

Down Yesterday.
The fall term Of the United States ClI-
cult Court Of Appeals, postponed from
earlier in the month. opened here yester-
dav with Judges Gom. simonton, and
Morris on the bench. There We're
good number Of lawyers present and the
Srst 6sv was devoted chiefly 10 render
ing decisions in cases argued some
months ago.
OPINIONS HANDED DOWN.
oplnlons were handed down in the fol-
lowing cases;
Pythlas Of the World. plaintiff in error
vs. Ellen NJ. Hill. defendant I'm error
In error to Circuit Court Of West VIZ
einia. at Parkersburg. opinion by Judge
Goff Affirmed.
No. 153. Theodore g. Gaillard. Cherries
p Swan. r. Hayne Pepper, Charles b.
Mcdonald, plaintiffs in error VS.. Anania
Cantini. defendant In error. In error
TO Circuit Court OF South Carolina, AT
Charleston. Opinion by Judge Golf. AT
frmed.
No. i5s. Southern Railway Company,
purchaser. appellant. VS.. American
Brake Company WESTINGHOUSE Air
Brake Company. lessee. appellee. APP
neal from Circuit Court Eastern District
OF Virginia. at Richmond. Opinion by
Judge Simonton. Affirmed.
No 157. Southern Railwal Company.
purchaser. appellant. vs.. Adams Bro
theirs & Paynes. appellees. Appeal from
Circuit Court. Eastern ID rict % Viz
ginia. AZ Richmond Opinion by Judge
Slmonton. Affirmed
No. 15S Southern Railway Company,
purchaser. appellant. vs.. the Dunlop
Mills. appellees Appeal from Circuit
Count Eastern District Of Virginia, at
Richmond Opinion by Judge Simonton.
Reversed.
No. l59. Southern Railway Company.
purchaser. appellant. vs.. Warner Moore
& Co. appellees. Appeal from Circuit
Court Eastern District of Virginia. at
Richmond Opinion by Judge Simonton.
Affirmed.
No. 10. Southern Railway Company.
purchaser. appellant. VS.. Carnegie Steel
Company Oimited). appellee. Appeal from
Circuit Court. Eastern District OF Vir-
einia. at Richmond. Affirmed, with costs.
opinion by Judge Simonton.
No. 16s. Greenville Savings Bank and
George A. Norwood. appellants. vs. James
r. Lawrence, appellCes. Appeal from the
Circuit Court OF South Carolina. at
Charleston. Affirmed, with costs. Opin-
Ion by Judge Morris.
No 167. b. j. Pritchard. plaintiff in
error. VS.. 2. Il. Budd and Matthias J.
Forbes. trading as Budd & Forbes de-
PENDANTS in error. In error TO the Circuit
Court Of West Virginia. at Charleston.
Opinion by judge Golf. Affirmed.
No. 1853 The Hamburg Bremen Fire
Insurance Company, Of Hamburg and
Bremen. Germany. appellant, vs.. the
Pelzer Manufacturing Company. appel
lee Appeal from Circuit Court OF South
Carolina. at Charleston. Affirmed, with
costs Opinion by Judge Morris.
No. III. Southern Railway Company.
purchaser, appellant. vs.. John X. Tillett.
appellee. Appeal from Circuit Court
Eastern District OF Virginia. at Rich-
mond. opinion by Judge Simonson.
Affirmed.
ONE CASE ARGUED.
The first case called for argument was
that OF Alfred L. Thorn receiver At
lantic and Danvile Railway Company,
AGAINST the Norfolk and Carolina Ran
road Company. Appeal from The District
Court Of the United States for the East.
ern District OF Virginia. at Norfolk. Tho
case was argued by Alfred Il. Thorn
and Richard Wake for appellant, and
by Robert NJ and Floyd Hughes for APP
pellee. and submitted.
Charles w Tillott Esq. Of Charlotte.
y. c.. ana David ". Robinson. OF Lin
colnton. n. c.. were admitted as attor-
neys OF the court.
THE Y. s. CIRCUIT COURT.
IN the United States Circuit Court.
before Judge Robert w. Hughes, the
following cases We're argued:
Henry Sanford against the Richmond
and Danvillo Railroad Company. and
against the Richmond, West Point Ter
minal Railway and Warehouse Com
pany: by J. A. Cabell for plaintiff, and
b. y. Munford for defendant
The cases 81 the steam tugs Ajax and
u. y. Lane. Jr.. sold month ago were
argued by William Flegenheimer. NJ. NJ.
Smith. Jr.. and Floyd Hughes.