The Saint Paul globe. (St. Paul, Minn.) 1896-1905, 1896-10-07

Furniture and Carpet Company, respondent
49, Lake Phalen Land and improvement
Company VS.. Rose Lindeke Ell al, appellants
Nov. A..
spondent. VS.. G. w. Brown. appellant. Oct
49, State VS.. Adams Express Company, re-
spondent. Oct. 81.
Al State vs. Board of County Commits
sloners Of Grow Wing County, respondents
Oct. 16.
49,. State. ex rel. German ct al. VS.. John
Copeland. respondent. Oct. 20.
as. State VS.. Pioneer Press Company ct al.
POLK county division) Oct. 16.
AZ. State VS.. Clarence e. Bondy ct. al.
(Anoka- Hastings insane hospital contro-
versy). Nov. 4.
As. State If Minnesota VS.. Charles R. Lowe.
appellant. Nov. t.
40. Minneapolis salvage corps case. Nov. 5.
so. State VS.. Farmers and Merchants
S late Bank ct al. Nov. 10.
60. Appeal of Great Northern-Steenerson
70 Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway VS..
Barclay Cooper. Continued.
rs. Isaac L. Mahan respondent, VS.. c. B.
Smith. appellant. Motion dismiss. Oct. q.
| rs. Mark A. Heaton and Levi NJ. Stewart
VS.. Henrietta M. Darling ct al. appellants.
so. Matte Miller, respondent. VS.. st. Paul
City Railway Company. Oei. &c.
81. A. P. L. Cochrane. appellant, VS.. Levi
M. Stewart and Warren P. Curtis. respond
"a. c. A. Smith Lumber Company ct al.
appellants VS.. Central Manufacturers Mutual
Insurance Company. Continued.
81. M. T. Starr, respondent, vs.. w. G. RI
ley, in. ervenor ct al. Motion to affirm today.
80. Commercial Bank VS.. Azotine Manufac
turing ri Company NJ ~ et al. Nov, 20. y n
Bloom, respondent. Dec. 10.
IS. w. N. Shepard. respondent. VS.. F. M.
Blossom ct al Nov. 10.
SO. Hans Olson, respondent, VS.. State Bank
of Minneapolis ct al. Dec. "a.
los. Andrew Saiko, respondent, VS.. st. Paul
City Railway. Company. appellant: Nov. 16.
respondent vs. c.. w. Prouty ct al, appel
lants. Nov. 16.
112. John Hay, assignee, respondent, VS..
e. o. Tuttle appellant. Nov. so.
11S. John p Rea, receiver. respondent, VS..
]. s.. Mcdonald ct al, appellants Dec 8.
Ia. Charles M. Hausman. appellant. VS..
Peter Muehleran, respondent. Continued.
lis. James c. Harper, respondent VS.. Wal
ter N. Carroll. assignee Citizens bank, ap-
pellant. Dee. /.
III. Minneapolis Trust Company, receiver,
VS.. L. F. Menage ct al, Nov. a.
III. Minneapolis Paper Company VS.. SWIM
burne Co. ct al, Nov. "a.
122. Myrta A. Layman. administratrix. re-
spondent, VS.. Minneapolis Street Railway
Company, appellant. Dec. l..
124. Sandwich Mfg Co., respondent, VS..
Joseph E. Krake, appellant. submitted on
1875. A. H. Paget, receiver, VS.. Electrical
Engineering Co., appellant. Dec. g.
127. Alfonso Blondell, respondent, vs., st.
12S. Frank Riley and the Fire Association
of philadelphia VS.. c., M. & St. P. Ry.. re-
spondent. Dec. f.
dent. VS.. M. L. Hallowell Jr. ct al, appel
lants. Nov 20.
13O-131. Sturtevant-Larrabee Co., appellant,
VS.. Mast, Buford G. Burwell ct al. Dec. 2.
1872. Hershey Lumber Co.. respondent, VS..
ST Paul Sash. Door and Lumber Co., appel
liant. Dec. g.
1873. ]. H. Rowell, respondent. VS.. E. B.
Zier. appellant Dec. 3.
1876. John Mclean, respondent, VS.. George
F. Dean. appellant. Dec. q
1888. John Marty, respondent. vs.. Charles
140. Traders Insurance company, respon-
dent, vs. William Herber ct al Dec. 7.
al. Louisa E. Knauft, appellant, VS.. Levi
142.-James T. Walsh appellant, VS.. John
Featherstone respondent. Dec. g.
IA. John B. Weber. executor, appellant
vs.. st; Paul City Railway Co., respondent.
14S Minneapolis Base Ball Co. ct al. vs.
City Bank ct al. Dec. Z.
:, LAG; Robert Morris, respondent. VS.. Great
Northern Ry., appellant. Dec. T.
al G. l. Fall. appellant. VS.. c. A. YOU
r1 1!s William Mn1sa E. ysazie, apBslant vs.
49, Elizabeth L. Gardner. appellant, VS..
Dec. 8.
o.
154 Mamie Lane, respondent, VS.. State
Agricultural Society, appellant. Dec. 9.
49, Northern Trust company, assignee, L.
F. Menage, VS.. Crystal Lake Cemetery Asso-
1877; Amelia Moratzky. appellant, VS.. Carl
Wirth, respondent. Dec. II.
l59 John G. Johnson, respondent VS.. Min
neapolis General Electric Co., appellant.
Dec. II.
161. Ephraim and Jane G. Place, respon-
dents, VS.. St. Paul Title Insurance and Trust
CGmnanV annQllanf
l62. Katherine Schultz, respondent, VS..
John S. Bower. appellant. Oct. 8.
l63 Grace Granger. respondent, vs.. Will
frmed.
1853. D. S. wemple, appellant, vs. Northern
Dakota Elevator Co., respondent. Dec. IA.
States Life Insurance Co., appellant. Oct o
10. John B. McHugh, appellant, VS.. City
OF ST Paul. respondent. Dec 15
civ ., JS On p n, Hammargren respondent. VS..
IT, Farmers National Bank of Owatonna.
respondent VS.. Hiram Baekus ct al. Dec. l6.
.n rs. w M X. Murray respondent. vs. Ada B.
Dec. II. -'--' @ppe-. '
III, l7s A. Swanson, respondent, VS.. E. q.
Mellen, appellant. Dec IT,
III. Moses Stewart Jr respondent vs Eg
pert CoWles ct al Dec. IT,
lS. charles A. Graham, respondent. vs. w.
s. 17 Sonrad lapel appellant Dec. l.,
and Others Oct. 20. @'
ISL. Thos. McRoberts ct al. RESPONDENTS
VS. VIM. Macarthur ct al, appellants; sub.
united on briefs yesterday.
lS4-lSo. Estate of N. w. Kittson VS. ST.
Paul Trust Company, Dec. 49,
:, ISL Frank E. Mix, respondent VS.. James
II. Eye, appellant. Dec. /.
1885, Park Bros. Company. respondents
vs. e. t. Sykes ct al Dec. 81
100 c. E. Brame, appellant, VS. Horace
A. Towne, respondent Oct g.
ISL. George N. Moran, appellant. VS.. g. 8
small ct at, respondents. Dec. 49,
IL W. Henry Stein. respondent, Vs. NJ Roel-
l lena s ac IS and Loan Association appel
1877. Chicago Great Western Railway Com
peny, appellant, VS.. St Paul Union DEPOT
Company: Jan. 4.
1893. Adolph wulf. appellant, VS.. Walter A.
Wood Harvester Company. respondent. Jan.
200, City Of Minneapolis VS.. Chris Nelson.
appellant. Oct. q.
2O1. F. NJ. Stoltze assignee, appellant VS..
Bank of Minnesota, respondent, Jan. 4
20S. Peter Schussler, respondent. VS.. Hen
nepin County Commissioners, appellants: mo-
ton to affirm. Oct. g.
Great Western Jan. s.
2O6. L. D. Hause, as receiver, VS.. Robert
Mannheimer, appellant Jan. 6.
207. James s. Ray. receiver, VS.. George r.
Lewis ct al, appellants. Jan. 10.
2O2-2O9. NJ. P. Hayne, receiver. respondent.
VS.. Metropolitan Trust Company ct al. Jan. 4
I'll. Mall OlmScnel1, respondent, Nell
son-Tenney Lumber Company. appellant
Oct. s.
2i2. A. A. Eckman, respondent VS. Charles
Lauer ct al, appellants. Jan. g.
213. VIM. j. Stewart, respondent VS..
Thomas E. Cannon, appellant; submitted. SO
Us. Sarah S. Johnson, respondent, VS.. ST.
Paul City Railway Company, appellant.
IGN. s.
521s. Bennett Hall. respondent VS.. j. A.
Shea; order OF lower court affirmed.
217 Henry Stong, respondent, VS. F. W.
Lane, appellant; submitted on briefs.
221. VIM. F. Graves. respondent, VS.. G. w.
Merrill ct al. Jan. IL.
Annie Moore al M ctr racnond