The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1896-05-22
LONG LAPSE OF TINE
Major Bcyce Seeks a Divorce From
His Deserving Wife.
A BILL FOR STAINED GLASS
n. Rhodda vs.. the Big Hole Lime
o. Flux Company-An Old Ac-
count Against ' harton g.
e Noyes- Court Notes.

James r. Boyce. ST.. began action
yesterday for divorce from his wife.
Adelaide +. Boyce. whose Whereabouts
at the present time. says the complaint.
are unknown to the plaintiff. They
Were united in marriage in Philadel-
phia, No. 8. 1876. Desertion on the mart
OF the wife is given as the sole cause
Tor the action, she having left her nus
band on or about Oct. Is, 1889.
w. III. Johnson filed papers in a suit
yesterday against John II. Curtis and
wHe, a. Largey and wife, Hermit
uas Godfn and wife and James L. Ham
ilton to compel them to pay him a bal
ance OF S4S alleged to be due him for
work done on the building in East
broadway, known as the Butte hotel
annex. AS specified in the complaint,
the plaintiff furnished and placed in
position the stained glass in the struc-
ture. Godin had the contract for the
erection of the building, and johnson
says in his complaint that the contrac-
tor employed him to furnish the stained
glass. Curtis. Largely and Hamilton
own the annex, the contract price for
the building of which was $40, S30 and
the wives of the three first named are
made parties to the action simply TO
ter.
The action is backed by a mechanics
lien, which was secured April %. In
addition to the $4S, the plaintiff asks
for $l1 to cover the cost of securing the
lien and an attorneys fee Of $3.50, a to-
tai of 5000. To satisfy the claim he re-
quests that the land and premises be
sold under an order and decree Of fore
closure of the court.
Henry Rodda VS.. the Big Hole Lime
q Flux company is the title of a suit
filed yesterday. The company COM
prises j. s. Shropshire, NJ. L. Wines,
j. Fl. Vivion, j. j. Cusick and w. Ben
nett. The complaint alleges that on
June 10, 1890. the company executed
and delivered to plaintiff a promissory
note for $1,000 payable 30 days after
date and drawing interest at the rate of
10 per cent. per annum; that on Oct
9, 1894. a demand for the redemption
of the paper was made. but the COM
pany ignored it,
w. w. Johnson & Co. have sued L. j.
Lachman & Co. for s550.57 alleged to be
due for whiskey sold defendants about
Jan. of this year.
Durkee & Emerson commenced suit
against W. s. Wharton and ,
allege is due them for merchandise
sold defendants Sept. 3, 1889, and Nov.
3, 1890, at which time defendants were
doing business under the firm name of
Wharton & Noyes.
Morty o. Sullivan filed suit yester-
day against Carrie Schultz to recover
$3.50 and costs of action and $50 dam
ages alleged to be due him by reason
Of the defendants desire to withhold |
20 feet of granite coping and seven
granite posts which she secured pos
session of on the 18th inst, and which
Sullivan says belong to him.
The heirs of Eugene Mcfarland can
now step up to the captains desk and
secure recognition, for yesterday the
suit of w. II. Aylesworth ct al VS.. Eu- !
gene Mcfarland ct al. for a partition
If the property owned by Aylesworth
3 Mcfarland was brought to a focus
by the payment of $3.50 to the clerk ,
II the district court. This money was
called from the estate and is for dis
among the respective heirs.
The appeal papers in the case OF Mrs. ,
u. ]. Wey VS.. Ed f. Lynch and John
\. Cannon, were filed in the district :
,ourt yesterday. The suit was brought
" Mrs. Wey to recover 500 alleged to
,e due her from the defendants for
laving made out a list of saloon men
aging license in silver Bow county
he case was heard in Justice AImon's
curt Jan. "a, and resulted in a verdict
4 $25 and costs of action for the plain
if.
New Designs in Wall Paper at
IL w. Broadway. :.