The record-union., 1896-05-17
SUPREME COURT.

| L. A. S-Hellman VS.. ShOulterS,
Treasurer-By the court. Rehearing
granted. Beatty, c. J.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
| Friday, May Is, 1896.
| Court met at 10 a. m. Present: Har-
rison, j., presiding; Garoutte, j.; Van
Fleet, j.; Marshall, Deputy Clerk;
Washburn, Bailiff
Sac. 1O3-Estate of Winters, de-
ceased-Pursuant to stipulation, cause
submitted on briefs on file.
Sac. 169-Estate of Martin, deceased
Pursuant to stipulation, cause SUBJ
mitted on briefs on file.
Sac. 115-Ascha VS.. Fitch-Pursuant
to stipulation, cause submitted on
briefs on file.
Sac. 175-Roher, executor. ETC., VS..
Babcock = Pursuant to stipulation,
cause submitted on briefs on file
Sac. 53-Mini VS.. Mini-Pursuant to
stipulation, cause submitted on briefs
on file
| Grim. 136-The People, etc, vs. Eagan
Thirty days granted appellant to file
brief; respondent thirty days to re-
ply, and appellant fifteen days.
Sac. 15O-Barnhardlt VS. Edwards,
administrator, etc.-Fifteen days grant
ed appellant to file brief; fifteen days to
respondent to reply, and ten days to
appellant.
Sac. 92-Tulare County vs. May.
Sac. 1S1-Tulare County VS.. Jefferds
ct al.-Transferred from Department
Two; hearing consolidated; causes ar
gued by w. W. Middlecoff for appel
lants, and w. B. Wallace for respond
ents, and submitted
Sac. 199-Estate Of Body, deceased
Cause argued by R. C. Minor for ap-
pellant and A L. Levinsky for re-
spondent, and submitted.
Sac. 112-Oullahan ct al vs. Baldwin
ct al.-Cause argued by Mich. Mulla-
ney for appellants; no appearance for
respondents, and submitted
Adjourned for the term.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
Friday, May Is, 1896.
| Court met at 10 a. m. Present: Nc
Farland, J., presiding; Temple, j.; Hen
shaw, j.; McCraney, Deputy Clerk;
Girvin, Acting Bailiff.
S,3O1-Prouty VS.. Devin ct al.-Cause
argued by Judson Brusie for respond
ent; no appearance for appellant, and
submitted
Sac. 165-Stephens, administrator, vs.
Hambleton ct al.-No appearance; con-
tinued
Sac. 92-Tulare County vs. May
Sac. 1S1-Tulare County VS.. Jefferds
ct al.-Transferred to Department One
Sac. 1OO-Power VS.. May, Treasurer
Cause argued by T. E. Clark for ap-
pellant and W. w. Middlecoff for re-
spondent, and submitted.
! Sac. 1O4-San Joaquin Lumber Com
pany VS.. Welton ct al.-Cause submitted
on briefs on file.
Sac. 119-The Guild Gold Mining
Company VS. Mason-Pursuant to stip-
ulation, cause submitted on briefs on
file.
Sac. 6 and Sac. 123-Loftus ct al. VS.
Fischer ct al.-Hearing continued to
San francisco Friday, May o. 1896.
Grim 13S and Grim. 143-The Peo-
pie, etc, VS.. Tallmadge-Cause argued
by ]. G. Swinnerton for appellant;
Charles H. Jackson, Deputy Attorney
General, for respondent, and j. G. Swim:
merton for appellant, in reply and SUBJ
mitted
| Grim. 139-The People, ETC., VS.. Ross
Cause argued by Charles H. Jackson
for respondent; no appearance for ap-
pellant and submitted
Grim. 164-The People, ETC., vs. Turner
Cause argued by George Collins for
| appellant; Charles H. Jackson, Deputy
Attorney General, for respondent, and
George Collins for appellant, in reply,
and submitted.
| Adjourned to San Francisco, Friday,
May %, 1896, at 10 O'Clock.
| IN BANK.
Friday, May 15, 1896.
| Grim. 172-Ex parte Turner on ha-
beas corpus-Application denied. In
chambers. W. c. Van Fleet, Associate
Justice Supreme Court.
| 5,2O2-Santa Rosa City Railroac
Company VS.. Central Street Railway
| Company
Ia, 14,592-Burlings VS.. NewIands.
| 15,114-Southern Pacific Company VS.
Allen-By the court. Rehearings denied,
May 10, 1896.
POLICE COURT CALENDAR.