The herald., 1896-10-22
THE SUPREME COURT
The Case Of Durraut, the San Francisco
Murderer, Submitted
Attorneys Admitted to Practice in This
State-Cases Entered on Today's
Calendar for Hearing.

The celebrated case of Durrant, the
Emanuel church murderer of San Fran
cisco, came up before the supreme court
in bank yesterday, and was submitted
| Most of the day was taken up by
counsel arguing in the San Diego water
| suits, and these will be concluded this
| morning.
The following gentlemen were ad-
mitted to practice in this state, on mo-
ton: Walter ]. Trask, L. F. Eggers and
Walter Bennett.
The following are the cases set for
hearing today:
The People, etc., respondent, VS.. Ea-
gan, appellant-San Francisco county;
Attorney General Fitzgerald for re-
spondent, John L. Love, S.. H. Regens-
berger for appellant.
The People. ETC., respondent, VS.. Bark
er, appellant-San Bernardino county;
Attorney General Fitzgerald for re-
spondent, Paris & Allison for appellant.
The People, etc, respondent, vs. Lou
rintz appellant-San Francisco county;
Attorney General Fitzgerald for re-
spondent, L. G. Pistolesi, j. A. Stephens
for appellant.
The People, etc.. respondent, VS.. Page,
appellapt-San Francisco county-At-
ent, ]. N. e. Wilson, Alex. Campbell jr.,
for appellant.
The People, ETC., respondent, VS.. Bos-
| quet, appellant = Sacramento county;
Attorney General Fitzgerald for re-
spondents, E. c. Hart, c. T. Jones for
appellant. d.
The People, etc., respondent, VS.. Main,
appellant-Napa county; Attorney Cen
eral Fitzgeald for respondent, George
e. Caldwell for appellant.
Miller, respondent, VS.. Carr, appel
lant-Kern county; ]. w. Mahon for
respondent, Edward ]. McCutcheon for
appellant.
Leet ct al, respondents, VS.. Board of
Supervisors, etc., appellant-Kern coun-
ty; Laird & Packard, j. w. Mahon for
respondents. Alvin Fay for appellant.
First National Bank Of Santa Ana,
appellant, VS.. Erralla, ct al, respond
ents-Orange county; Gibson & Titus,
]. e. Hizar. ]. w. Ballard for appellant,
Victor Montgomery for respondents.
Van Week, respondent, vs. Board of
Dental Examiners, ETC., appellant
Orange county; Knight, Simpson &
Harpham for respondent, J. w. Bal
lard for appellant.
pondents-Riverside county; Puring-
ton & Adair Collier & Evans for appel
liant, w. ]. Mcintyre, E. B. Stanton,
Caldwell & Duncan for respondents.
Richards, respondent, VS.. Lake View
Land company. appellant-Riverside
county; e. B. Stanton. o. P. Wideman.
for respondent, knight & Harpham for
appellant.
Gillian, respondent. VS., Brown, ap-
pellant-Kern county; E. Rosseau for
respondent B. Brundage for appellant.
Wells, petitioner, vs. Torrance, judge,
etc, espondent-Prohibit Geo. HI.
p. Shaw for petitioner.
Cook, respondent VS.. Cockins, ap-
pellant-Riverside county; j. F. Con-
key for respondent, Collier & Evans for
appellant.
Samtelle, appellant, VS.. Murrey ct al.
pondents-Riverside county; w. s..
Wright for appellant, Collier & Evans
for respondents
Byrne, respondent VS.. Hoag ct al,
ppellants-Riverside county; Puring-
ton & Adair for respondents, Charles
r. Gray for appellants
Adams, appellant, VS.. Crawford ct al,
pordents-Riverside county; George
B. Coll for appellants, w. M. Peck, Jas.
Callam, L. Gill, J. M. Lucas for respond
ents.
Rothschild, appellant, VS.. Swope. re-
spondent-Riverside county; George A.
Rankin for appellant, o. P. Taylor for
respondent.