The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1896-09-03


motion judgment on pleadings- Parke
& Kroeger; J. H. Hurd.
40-Sarata Walker VS.. w. R. Jones;
demurrer to and motion TO strike out
amended complaint z. R. Winters;
Moyle, Zane & Costigan-
41-DessTet National Bank VS.. Lit
tie, Roundy & Co. ct al; motion judg
ment on pleadiugs. lie Grand Young;
Jones & Schroeder.
42-James Johnston VS.. jeremiah
Schenck et al; demurrer to complaint.
c. c. Dey, E. W. Wilson; Breeze &
Burris
-MiGler-Hawley Mfg. Co, ETC., vs..
z. c. H. Rfx; demurrer to amended
complaint. Richie & RItclhfe; Pence. &
Allen.
A-winiam S. Mccormick VS. Henry
Sadler; motion for new trial. C. S.
Varian; Baldwin & Tatlock.
45-New Metzger Med. Co., etc, vs.. w.
A. Nelden; demurrer to complaint.
Jones & Schroeder; Stephens & Schroe-
der.
46-JoGln E. Billings, etc, VS.. z. H.
Parsons ct al: demurrer to amended
/ complaint c. Q. WEaittemore; Stephens
& Schroeder.
47-F. E. Gregg, etc, VS.. Hyrum
! Groesbeck ct al; motion leave file sup
Elemental answer; motion for contin-
uance. Stepllans & Smith; I. ]. An
derson, c. c. Dey.
State Bank of Utah VS.. Pacific
Hedge Co., etc, ct al. demurrer to
complaint Barlow Ferguson; c. S.
Varian
43-Salt Lake Dramatic association VS..
d. j. Williams ct al; demurrer to COM
plant. Ferguson & Cannon; D. Har-
rington. H c. Edwards, j. N. Tanner.
50-WelFs, Fargo & Co, VS.. Jesse w.
Fox, jr., ct. al; demurrers to complaint.
! VTifnhay. ToT4cl1 q IL g. Enx-la- Par-
low Ferguson.
51-Amelia Jones, ct. al. VS.. William
Anderson, etc. demurrer to complaint.
c. c. Dey; Stephens & Smith.
52-H. w Fuller VS.. Albert Smith ct.
al; demurrer to complaint. ]. K. Denny;
Smith & Nelson.
53-John w. Smith VS.. William H.
Robinson, ex.: demurrer to complaint.
| j. A. Williams; G.. F. Putnam.
54-Johr C. Gray VS.. Simon Eiseman
ct. al; demurrer to complaint. Loofbou-
row & Kahn, Booth, Lee & Gray; G. G.
Dey.
55-First National bank, Dillon. VS..
Boyd Park ct al. motion new trial. LIE
Grand Young; Sutherland & Murphy.
56-William L. Knisell VS.. Maggie
Pickering ct. al; demurrer to complaint.
T. Ellis Browne; H. V. Van Pelt.
57-Guy c. Royce VS.. Salt Lake city;
motion new triad. L. NJ. Armstrong, 0.
W. Powers; William Mckay, D. B..
Hampstead.
5S-Girard c. w. Lowry ct. al. VS.. Ed
ward Contain; demurrer to amended
complaint c. c. Dey; Loofbourow q
| Kahn.
5s-Joseph M. Stout VS.. Oscar R. Zipf;
demurrer to complaint. F. G. Waite;
Powers Straup & Lippman.
Cor. c. Halliday vs.. James II. Bacon
ct. al: demurrers to complaint. Suther-
/ land & Murphy. Pence & Allen; Booth.
Lee & Gray, Brown, Henderson &
King, Dickson, Ellis & Ellis.
61-Harvey Hardy VS.. James H. Ba-
con, ct. al; same.
CIV. ]. Gilbert, ETC., VS.. James H
Bacon ct. al; demurrers to complaint,
! motions dissolve attachment, and to in
crease bond. J. H. Hurd; Booth, Lee
& Gray, Dickson, Ellis & Ellis, Moyle,
Zane & Costigan.
CIV. H Knox VS.. James H. Bacon
ct al; demurrers to complaint, motion
dissolve attachment, motion increase
bond E. D. r. Thompson; Booth, Lee
& Gray MoyIe. Zane & Costigan, Dick
son. Ellis & Ellis.
eA-F. w. Hanson VS.. James H. Bacon
ct. al; demurres to complaint. H. G.
Edwards: Booth, Lee & Gray, Dickson,
| Ellis & Ellis, Moyle, Zane & Costigan.
e5-Felix ]. Stark VS.. James H. Ba-
con ct al.; motion to dissolve attach
ment. H ]. Dininny; Booth, Lee &
Gray, Dickson, Ellis & Ellis
66-George Easton VS.. Harry HAYNES
ct al; demurrer to complaint. S. P.
Armstrong, Powers & Straup; Moyle,
Zane & Costigan.
Cts. L. Maxwell vs. Whitmore Pro-
duce and P Company; demurrer to
complaint. W. T. Gunter; Pardee &
| Kroeger
6SELena D. Peasley VS.. James H.
| Bacon ct al; demurrer to complaint.
E. D. r. Thompson; Moyle, Zane 81
Costigan.
ga H Boxrud VS.. James H. Ba-
con ct al; demurrer to complaint.
| Bowdle & Dix; Booth, Lee & Gray,
Brown, Henderson & King.
/ 70-W. H Schluter VS.. David James
ct al; demurrer to complaint. Jones &
Schroeder; Young & Moyle.
lib. T. Bengston VS.. Salt Lake City
ETC.; demurrer to complaint. H. A.
Smith, c. NJ Nelson; William Mckay,
! d. b. Hampstead.
72-Ben r. Haddock VS.. Utah Lime
and Cement company; demurrer to
complaint Richards & Richards; Ben
nett, Hardness, Howat e Bradley.
73-David Adler & Sons company VS..
Edward Contain; demurrer to COM
plant. Jones & Schroeder; Loofbourow
& Kahn.
74-Clayton R. Turrill, etc. VS.. Salt
Lake and Los Angeles Railway COM
pany; motion for new trial. W. c..
Hall; Richards & Richards.
75-Mary R. Kraack VS.. Draper Irri-
cation company; demurrer to COM
plaint. Bowdle & Dix; T. Ellis Browne.
76-Alfred Best VS.. D. w. James ct
al; demurrer to complaint. Richards
&, Richards; Young & Moyle.
T-Great Salt Lake & Hot Springs
Railway VS. The Herald company; de-
murrer to complaint. Charles Z. Pear
son; J. H. Hurd.
7S-Mary e. Osborn VS.. Fidelia B.
Hamilton; demurrer TO amended COM
plant D. Harrington, II. c. Edwards;
Powers, Straup & Lippman.
79-AleX c. Mclean VS.. Western
Union Telegraph company; motion to
change venue. Moyle, Zane e COST
gan; Evans & Rogers.
SO-First National Bank of Park City
IS. A. E. Hyde ct al; demurrer to
complaint; motion to strike complaint
from files. E. D. R. Thompson; N V.
Jones, c. w. Boyd.
S1-Sarah I. Jones, adninistraltrix, VS.
William Mcqueen ct al: demurrer. tx
complaint; Rawlins & Critchlow; Pow.
ers, Straup & Lippman-
S2-Mammpth Mining Co. VS.. Sail
Lake Building and Manufacturing Co
ct al; demurrer TO complaint; Bennett
Herkness, Howat & Bradley; C. C. Dey
S3-Deseret National Bank VS.. Brig