The Saint Paul globe. (St. Paul, Minn.) 1896-1905, 1896-11-15
DISTRICT COURT DOINGs.
Now Cases Begun, and Old Ones
variOusIy Disposed of.

The following matters heard in spe-
cial term of the district court yesterday:
Judge Otis
Mary E. Cheever vs. John H. C. Cheever;
application by defendant for an order vacat-
ing the judgment heretofore entered argued
and taken under advisement.
State of Minnesota, ex. REL. George ]. Flint
VS.. Ellen Flint; petition for an order modify
Ing former order denied.
Margaret s N. Diche vs.. Sarah B. Mahan ct
c. N. Nelson Lumber Company VS.. W. T.
Bailey ct al; stricken.
James Fl. Butterfeld VS.. George w. Free
man; stricken. r,
Frederick Zehunder VS.. August Meyer ct
al, administrator; application for final decree
and foreclosure submitted.
National Park Bank of New York VS.. F. M.
Lytzen Company, defendant and Scandinavian
American Bank, garnishee; stricken.
Hertz Brothers VS.. John Novak defendant
and John Gondnoskh garnishee; dismissed.
D. A. Monfort VS.. S. A. Magofhn ct al;
stricken.
Mary McDougalI VS.. Frank Waters ct al. !:
mttted.
Hattie NJ. Woods vs. A. NJ. Lawton ct al. ;
application to correct name submitted.
In Adolph Kalman, insolvent; applica-
ton TO fix date for filing releases submitted.
Rand Drill Company vs. James Forrestal
ct al; application to enforce supplementary
proceedings submitted.
A. McLaren Moses CapiStrant; demur-
rer to complaint submitted.
NJ. ]. Bell VS.. Minnesota Savings Bank ap-
plication to compel plaintiff to produce GER
tain papers submitted.
Little & Co. VS.. G. B. D. Tudor ct al; ap-
plication for order requiring witnesses.
The n. W. Fire Insurance Company VS..
Percy A. Redpath; application for the ap-
pointment of receiver for certain mortgaged
property: argued and taken under Amusement
Henry White ct al. vs. Silas B. Walsh ct
al; motion for judgment in default in action
for ejectment granted.
st. Paul Trust Co., guardian, Mary A.
Carlin; application for judgment by default
submitted. 3IAl q
w. H. Allen, by Anna L. Allen vs. Mime
sofa Loan and Trust Co.; application to dis
tinue. fl
Sarah A. Lewis VS.. j. W. Straight; applica-
ton for final decree insforeclosure submitted
H. Goldblum VS.. H. G. Kittson; order per-
hitting the withdrawal of demurrer and de-
PENDANT given fifteen days to file answer.
In re. application OFF, Richard G. De Puy
for appointment of receiver for George R.
Toplif ct al, and Richard G.. De Puy VS..
George R. Topliff ct al; both submitted.
The following new cases were begun in the
district court yesterday-other matters under
consideration:
66,S20-John w. Griggs VS.. j. E. Geldreich
66,S21-Exchange Savings Bank VS.. Thuett
Brothers; suit to recover $1,000 alleged to be
due on a contract ms
sc, 822-Josephine Landroches VS.. Joseph
Landroches; action for divorce on grounds of
desertion. NIX, f..
chine Company VS.. E. Honeyman; suit to re-
cover $50 alleged to be due on a promissory
note. AfHdavit of garnishment filed.
Orders and Decisions
81 Sarah B. Ramaley ct al. VS. Florence
W. Ramaley ct al; order denying application
OF plaintiff to modify Judgment. Otis ].
65,771-Merton B. Thrift VS.. William Mel
roget ct al; decision 10 favor of plaintiff,
granting possession OF certain property.