The herald., 1896-04-20
The STATE SUPREME COURT
Il Will Convene for the April
Term This Afternoon
THE NEW QUARTERS READY
A Very Light Calendar to Occupy the
Time Of the Justices
Tomorrow Applicants for Admission
to Practice Examined

iomorroW Applicants Tor ADMISSION
to Practice Examined
convene for the April term in the new
quarters in the Bullard block at o'clock
this afternoon. Bailiff Washburn ar
rived In the. city on Saturday, and with
Deputy Clerk Woodbury., has been bus
lily engaged in getting things in shape
for the opening this afternoon. The
new quarters are complete in every de-
TAIL Mr.. Billiard having arranged the
top floor of his handsome building just
rs the officers of the court wished and
from plans prepared by them. The main
court room is very fine apartment, well
lighted and ventilated, and is situated
so high up that there will be no an
noyance from the noise of the streets.
The court room Of department 2, while
not SO large as the main court room, is
larger than at the old quarters. and is
also very we'll lighted. Besides, the
clerks Office and document room there
are rooms for the secretary, bailiff and
tanitor, all conveniently arranged. ~
wide hall runs the entire length of the
building, at the rear of which is the
Justices library and consultation room,
and opening from this room are the
Justices chambers. seven in number,
with the chief Justices room in the CEN
ter and those of the associate justices
on either side. With the exception of
little mating and few yards of car
pet nothing new has ben purchased.
and the entire expense of moving and
fitting up the new quarters will come
within $780, a striking contrast with the
previous move, when $4,000 was appro-
priated by the legislature for that pur-
pose, all of which was expended.
The docket for this term is a very
light one, and the justices will have am
pie chances for witnessing the Fiesta
iS leo
pected to be in attendance If he can ar
range matters in San Francisco so that
he can leave.
This afternoon the court will meet in
bank for the hearing of motions and for
the purpose Of facilitating matters at
torneys are requested to have the dis
trict and number of the cause printed
on briefs.
Tomorrow the court will also meet in
bank for the examination OF applicants
for admission to practice
Following is the calendar for the re-
mainder of the term:
Wednesday, April 22d. In banc:
The People, etc, respondent vs. Louis
sternberg, appellant, San Francisco
county.
The People, ETC., respondent. VS.. Mar
snail D. Miller, appellant Yuba county.
Tne People, ETC., respondent, vs. w
II. thompson, appellant Los Angeles
county.
AiC CoplC, ctC.,T6SDOnQenI, VS., Frank
c. Kloss, appellant, San Francisco
county.
Everett. guardian. etc, respondent,
VS.. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric
railway company, appellant, Los An
geleS county.
spondent, Kern county.
Roemer. appellant, Los Angeles county.
Thursday, April 23d. Department
One:
The People. ETC.. respondent VS.. VIM
Mason, n,appellant,S San Francisco county.
The People, ETC., appellant, vs. VIM.
W. de Winton, respondent, San Fran
cisco county.
The People, etc., respondent, VS..
Charles Brown, appellant. Fresno
The People. etc.. respondent VS..
Jerome Hickman, appellant. Tulare
county.
The People, ETC., respondent, VS.. Will
lam Curtis, appellant, Sacramento
The People, etc., appellant vs. b. w.
Cavanaugh. respondent Sacramento
county.
The People, etc, respondent, VS.. Ed
ward Ranged, appellant, Los Angeles
The People, etc., appellant, VS.. Mar
tina Dunlap, respondent, San Luis Obs
po county.
Thurcday, April 23d, department two
McCully, administratriX, etc, appel
liant. VS.. Cooper, respondent, San Diego
county.
Hollenbach, respondent, vs. Schnabel,
appellant, Los Angeles county.
RalphS, executor, ETC., respondent, VS.
Hensler ct al, appellants, Los Angeles
county.
McCully, Administrative. etc, appel
liant, VS.. O'Connor, receiver, ETC., re-
spondent, San Diego county.
Quinn ct al, appellants, VS.. Long
Beach Land and Water company ct al,
respondents, Los Angeles county
Ritzman. appellant, VS.. Burnham, re-
spondent, Los Angeles county.
Macarthur, appellant, VS.. Magee, re-
spondent, Los Angeles county.
William M. Bradbury, administrator,
etc, appellant, VS.. Davenport ct al, re-
spondents, San Diego county
Thursday. April 23d. department one.
The People, etc. respondent, VS.. Will
lam Mason, appellant, San Francisco
county.
The People ETC., appellant, VS.. Will
lam w. de Winton, respondent, San
Francisco county.
The People, etc, respondent, VS.. Chas.
Brown, appellant, Fresno county.
The People, ETC., respondent, VS.. Je-
rome Hickman, appellant, Tulare
county.
Friday. April Gath. department one:
County of orange, appellant, VS..
County of Los Angeles. respondent.
Ventura county.
Baker ct al, respondents, VS.. South
ern California Railway company, ap-
pellant, San Diego.
Bachman, appellant, VS.. Cathry ct al.
respondent, Kern county.
Estate of Griffith deceased, Los An
gcles.
Finger, respondent, VS.. McCaughey,
administrative, ETC., appellant, Santa
Barbara county.
Barry, Administrative, etc., appellant.
VS.. st. Joseph's Hospital, ETC., respond
ent, San Diego county.
Ruiz, as administrator, etc., appellant,
VS.. Dow ct al, respondents, Santa Bar
bara county.
Horton, administrator, ETC., appellant,
VS.. Jack, respondent, San Luis Obispo
county.
Thursday, April 2Sd, department one:
The People, ETC.. respondent, VS.. w.
l.. Eppinger, appellant, San Francisco
county
The People, ETC., respondent, VS..
Claude Armstrong. appellant, Tulare
county.
The People, etc., respondent, VS..
Frank Comyns, appellant, San Fran