The Saint Paul globe., 1896-12-06
DISTRICT COURT ROUTINE.
New Cases Begun and Special Tern
Work


Work
New cases begun in the district court YES
terday were as follows:
oo,S9l-Clara Turgeon VS.. Edward Turgeon;
acIlon for divorce on ground Of desertion
20 oa4 4Sz-!n the matter. of the assignment Of
Snaries A. Lang; schedule of assets and liza
Dllltles; assets, $1,51441; liabilities $6539.15
6l,ssIMartin Witch vs. Charles Franz !;
SUIT to recover $1,000 damages for alleged
66, 6,SeS-Charles A. NJ. Rystrom, by Peter
hystrom, guardian ad litcm, VS.. William A.
Lee and City Of st. Paul.
l. OF, o,S94-Hauser & Sons Mailing Co. vs. SOL
| issory note. = -
1 The following matters were heard in special
term OF the district court YESTERDAY.
| Before Judge Otis
In the matter of the proceedings to enforce
pay ineht Oh taxes on real estate remaining
uennquent eead on the first Monday of January,
1892 in county of Ramsey hearing on an
order to show cause and order discharged.
Anchor Investment Co. VS.. Columbia Elec-
! aric Co.; application for second judgment
Before Judge Willis
: Henry Fl. Gregg VS.. Robert B. Whitacre: or
| der TO show cause why defendant should not
be permitted to file supplemental answer and
| nave stay Of proceedings heard and submitted
In re assignment Of Bonk & Co., to Charles
RingWald, continued one week.
issued to Dennis Murphy who took oath of
allegiance to constitution Of United States in
| open court.
+ Before Judge Kelly
In re payment of taxes 1885, stricken
r IN re contest Of election of Henry Johns
referees to bs appointed by stipulation
Micnaei :. Bel vs. minnesota Savings Bank;
continued to Dhcember term.
,,1., 1Devils Lake Cooperative Association VS..
willard G. Brooks, defendant, and Great
Northern Railroad, garnishee; referred to
george N. Hillman to take disclosure
| Amelia E. Valentine vs. D. F. Valentine.
application to confirm sheriff's sale, submit
P. S. Peabody VS.. E. Honeyman. defendant.
and P. B. Mann Co., garnishee; referred
to George y. Hillman to take disclosure.
Klein & Sutnar VS.. e. Honeyman, defend
! ant, and P. B. Mann & Co.. garnisnee; re-
ferred to George N Hillman to take disclos-
| ure.
l., Mccormick Harvester and Machine Com
pany VS.. E. Honeyman defendant and P. b.
| Mann Co.. garnshee; referred to George
/ n. Hillman to take disclosure.
National German American Bank vs. Hav-
! ME Co.; application to file claim, submit
| st. Paul Brick Company VS. E. Thurston
ct al, defendants, and Minnesota Savings
Bank. garnishee; referred to George N. Hill
| man to take disclosure.
In re assignment of w. S. Dennis; applica-
| ton to file claim, submitted.
! In re assignment Of Charles Keil petition
! of Charles C. Keil; petition to fix time of
hearing, submitted.
Mary F. Hemminghouse vs.<Metropolitan
Loan and Savings Company; demurrer to
|
Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Com
pany VS.. Julia E. Cornforth; application to
confirm sheriff's report of sale submitted
Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Com
pany VS.. Charles L. Durocher; application to
| confirm sherifs report of sale, submitted.
| In re assignment of Adolph Kalman: ap-
| plication to fix time for filing releases. sub
| mitted.
In re contest of S. B. Carter; referred to
f. w. Bayer and o. H. O'Niel to count bal
| lots on Wednes day, Dec. 9, at 2 D. M
George B. Toms VS.. E. H. McHenry
stricken.
Walter Oakes VS.. A. S. Tallmadge ct al
application to confirm sheriff's report Of
sale. submitted.
Edward A. Pratt VS.. Janet Pratt; applica.
i tion for attorneys fees and alimony, sub
| mitted.
7es'g"ment of Frank A. Carlson: ap
/ plication to file certain releases and distribu
| ton Of assets, granted
Milton Garges vs.. st. Paul City Railway
i Company; motion for new trial on minute:
of court, dismissed.
Daniel Sanford VS.. Elizabeth Seulley: ap-
| plicatfon to perpetuate testimony of Charles
| L. A. Johnson and Emma johnson, granted
| Bennington F. Clark ct al VS.. Cochran &
4 Walsh: application to confirm sheriffs re
| port of sale, submitted.
!. Charles D. Marvin VS.. w. H. Mcdonald e
i al; application to quash struck jury, argued
| and submitted.
Ellen Rush, for Philip Rush VS.. St. Pau
City Railway Company; motion to quasi
| struck jury, argued and submitted.