davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1896-06-04
STATE OF MINNESOTA.

STATE OF MINNESOTA,
County of Mile Laos. So
To the Unknown Owner or Owners
. TAKE NoTICE-That the tract of land as
SeSSed IN your name, situate in the county of
Mile Laos, State of Minnesota, and described
as follows, to-wit: The NE4 Of SE4 of Sec
teen llD. the SCI Of SCI Of section 0 Eighteen te
rs re 81 Of SE1 Of Section t twenty-three
eA of SW74, the SW4 OF SWA, and the Sci
Of section thirty-three (33), all in township
thirty-nine 1891, north, range twenty-six .[261,
wes1; OF ING 4th mer: was pursuant to the
the year 1893 at the sale of forfeited lands pur-
suant to real estate tax Judgment amounting to
three n hundred qdl "a, and thirty-three 1881 dollars
IN the district court in the said county of
Mile Laos on the 18th day of September A. D.
1893, in proceedings to enforce the payment of
taxes upon said real estate delinquent in the
year one thousand eight hundred and seventy
nine 1871, and for prior years, and in the year
one thousand eight hundred and eighty-nine
! 1889 ana for prior years, for said county,
which sale was held at the county auditors Of
fee IN said county on the 18th day of October
A. D. 1893. sold to the State of Minnesota for the
sum OF three hundred and thirty three 1881
dollars and forty-four TAI cents. said sum being
the highest bid therefor: and the amount
required to release the said tract of land from
said sale exclusive of the costs to accrue upon
sa1s notlee: IS t tne sum OF seven hundred and
CENTS being the amount of said judgment and
subsequent delinquent taxes due thereon. and
subsequent taxes owing from the time said taxes
become delinquent, together with all the costs
Of proceedings herein described; and that
the time for redemption of said land will expire
sixty days after the service of this notice. and
proof thereof has been filed in my office.
Witness my hand and official seal at Prince
ton this 18th day of May, A. D. 1885,
B. M. VANALsTEIN
~ AUDITOR OF Mile Laos County, Minnesota.
The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1896-06-04
First Publication May 81, 1896.
Notice of Expiration Of Redemption.
STATE OF MINNESOTA.

STATE OF MINNESOTA,
County of Mile Laos, So.
To the Unknown Owner or Owners.
TAKE NoTICE-That the tract of land as
sesed IN your name, situate in the county Of
Mile Laos, State of Minnesota and described
as follows, to-wit: The northeast of the south
west quarter [NE14 of SW14l of section twenty
two [22] township forty T4O1 north. range
tWenty-seven [27]. west of the 4th principal
merldlan was. pursuant to the provisions of
cnaPter l5o Of the general laws of the year 1898.
at the sale OF forfeited lands, pursuant to real
forty -eight [48] dollars and twenty-five [25I
cents, entered in the district court in the said
county Of Mile Laos, on the 18th day of Sep
TENDER, a. u. l893, IN proceedings to enforce the
payment n! OF taxes upon said real estate delin-
quent in the year one Thousand eight hundred
and seVenty-nine 1881, and for prior years
and IN the year one thousand eight hundred and
elgty-nlne 1881 and for prior years. for said
county. winch sale was held at the county audi
Tors ONCE IN said county, on the 18th day Of
M fda9 for the Of fortyeight
sum being the highest bid therefor: and the
amount required. to release the said tract Of
land from said sale exclusive of the costs to ac-
crue upon this notice, is the sum of sixty-four
being the amount Of said Jud ss.
ment and subsequent delinquent taxes due
thereon, and subsequent taxes owing from the
time said taxes become delinquent together
Wild L all the costs OF proceedings herein de-
scribed; and that the time for redemption Of
vice Of this notice, and proof thereof has been
filed in my office. 20. - -
Witness my hand and ofacials seal at Prince
ton this 18th day OF May, A. D. 1896.
g .,.. !. q: M. 5VANALsTEIN
Auditor Of Mile Laos County Minnesota
The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1896-06-04
: First Publication May "a, 1896.
Sherif's Sale.

II virtue of an execution issued out of
- and under the seal of the district court
in and for the county of Mile Laos and State
OF Minnesota, upon a Judgment rendered and
d dock in the said court, on the 9th day of
May, A. D.. 1885, in an action wherein Henry G.
Cooney is plaintiff, and Frank Clark is de-
PENDANT, in favor of the said plaintiff and
against the said defendant for the sum Of six
ty-nlne and O-1OO dollars which execution was
directed and delivered to me as sheriff in and
for the said county of Mile Laos, have this
Il th day of May A. D. 1896, levied upon all the
right, title and interest of the said defendant
Frank Clark in and to the following described
real estate situate in the county Of Mile LacS
and and State OF Minnesota, and described as fol-
Caters Second Addition to Princeton as the
same is plated, on file and Of record in the Of
fee of the register of deeds of said county.
Notice is hereby given, That T. the under
signed, tas sheriff as aforesaid will sell the
above described real property to the highest
bidder, for cash, at public auction at the front
door OF the court house in the village of Prince
ton, in the county of Mile Laos and State of
Minnesota, on Friday, the Goth day of June. A.
ID 1896, at 10 O'Clock A. NJ, of that day. to sat
lsfy the said execution, together with the inter
est and costs thereon. S. @s
Dated May II, A. d. 1896
EMMETT MARK $780,
Sheriff of Mile Laos County Mimi
By A. MARK. Deputy
CHAs A. DICKEY 80
Attorney for Judgment Creditor.
The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1896-06-04
First Publication April 80, 1896.
Summons.

STATE OF MINNESOTA,
County of Mile Laos, S. r.. {.
District Court, Seventh Judicial District
James H. Ward and E. I. Davis l ..E5
Plaintiffs,
sEbenezer j. Srimgeaar Albert Good
year, Afford Goodyear, William E.
Larned John Rollins. George H. War
rem, Isaiah S. Mudgett Frank Hens
Ter, Alonzo Gates and George W.
Frank: also all other persons or par ~
ties unknown claiming any right til .---.
tie, estate, lien or interest in the real
estate described in the complaint .. = a-1
herein, defendants.
The State of Minnesota to the above named de-
PENDANTS: fE.5f 7a
i. You are hereby summoned and required to
answer the complaint of the plaintiffs in the
above entitled action which is on file in the Of
flee of the clerk Of said court at Princeton, in
the county of Mile Laos, State of Minnesota
and to serve a copy of your answer to said COM
plant on the subscriber at his Office in Prince
ton, in said county and State, within twenty
days after the service of this summons upon
you. exclusive of the day of such service and
If you fail to answer the said complaint within
the time aforesaid the plaintiff in this action
Will apply to the court for the relief demanded
IN the complaint together with the costs and
4 Dated April 80 1895.
CHAS. A. DICKEY
Plaintiff S Attorney, Princeton, Mimi
The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1896-06-04
First Publication May Z, 1896.
Summons. ...-

STATE OF, MINNESOTA, lss
County of Mile Laos, SIS.
District Court, Seventh Judicial District.
Hattie D. Archibald Plaintiff
VS.. ~ ~
WlntWorth j. Archibald, Defendant 1
The State Of Minnesota to the above named de-
PENDANT:
You are hereby summoned and required to
answer the complaint of the plaintiff in the
above entitled action which, is fled in the Of
nee OF the clerk of the district court of the
county OF Mile Laos and State of Minnesota. and
TO serve copy OF your answer to the said com
plant on the subscriber, at his office in the vii
days after the service of this summons upon
you, exclusive of the day of such service; and
II you fall to answer the said complaint within
the time aforesaid, the plaintiff in this action
Will apply to the court for the relief demanded
in the complaint. -. =
Dated February Is, 1896.
]. A. Ross,
Plaintiff Attorney, Princeton, MINI.
The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1896-06-04


depot. just before the column started
the judge addressed a few remarks to
the Sons and compl rented them on
their fine appearance. He also com-
plElmented the Uniform Rank. During
the parade these two bodies had acted
together, executing some display move
ments under the command of Lieut..
$ll111uerssen. There was large attend
ance, not only from the village but
from Milaca. Foreston, and the sur
rounding country, and it is estimated
that fully 2, 900 were present. Another
TACT which should not be passed unno-
tlced is that with. all this crowd the
day passed of splendidly, unmarried by
even the slightest accident.
Princeton has laid her floral tributes
on on the soldiers graves. She has re
neWed the sad and tender memories of
her fallen. Her children have been
given a valuable lesson in patriotism
and her duties are performed until
another e, year brings the day again.
Let the flowers forever fair
Bloom above our fallen braves,
Whlle the angels guard them there
Glory fingers DER their graves
The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1896-06-04
Notice Of lis Pendens.
STATEo OF MINNESOTA,
County of Mile Laos, IS.
District Court Seventh Judicial District.
James II. Ward and E. I. Davis,
{ ( l.

sTATEoF MINNESOTA, 80
District Court. Seventh Judicial District.
James q. Ward and r.. L Davis,
" Ebenezer j. Srimgeaar, Albert Good
year, Afford Goodyear, William E.
sLarned, John Rollins, George H. War
rem, Isaiah s. .Mudgett, Frank Hens IS
Ter, Alonzo Gates and George w.
Frank; also all other persons or par
Ties unknown claiming any right til
tie, estate, lien or interest in the real
estate described in the complaint as
herein, defendants. 5sg
Notice is hereby given, That an action has
9peen1 commenced in this court by the above
named plalntlffS against the above named de-
Iendants; that the object of said action is to
iaegermlne the adverse claim Of the defendants
parties respectively herein in and to the real
estate hereinafter described, and asking that
SalQ ADVERSE claim of the defendants and each
OF them may be adjudged by the court null and
be adjudged and decreed to be in the plaintiffs.
Inc. premises affected by said action
situated in the county of Mile Laos and
State OF Minnesota, are described as follows:
me southwest quarter of the northwest quarter
and the north half of the northeast quarter of
section seventeen, in township forty north of
range tWenty-six. west: the northwest quarter.
OF tine northwest quarter and the southwest
Quarter OF the northwest quarter of section
eleven, In township thirty EIGHT north of range
the northeast quarter and the southeast quar-:
ter Of the southwest quarter of section one in
township thlrty-eight north, of range twenty
seven, west; the northeast quarter of section
tWenty-slx, IN township thirty-nine. north, of
range twenty-seven,w west. m s
Dated April 20, 1896.
CHAS. A. DICKEY, IS
Plalntlf1 s Attorney, Princeton, MINI.
The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1896-06-04

A grand Fourth of July celebration
will be given at Heinm1ller's grove,
Mile Laos lake. There will be the
usual salute of artillery at sunrise, fol-
lowed by appropriate amusements and.
a grand DoWery dance. Hand bills will
be out soon giving full particulars.
The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1896-06-04
NOTES..

NOTES.
1t was the best Memorial day we
have ever had"
Inc e. a. 4. report shows that so of
the veterans were in line.
s'Doc" Northway became exhausted
on the march but recovered in a short
time.
Teams bothered the parade but little
and consequently everything passed off
smoothly. s=s
The Memorial day committee did a
vast amount of good work and the rel
suit of it's efforts was apparent.
The grand stand at the track was
crowded and there were as large a
number of people on the grounds who
could not obtain seats.
Judge Torrance was greatly pleased
with Princeton and was not slow to
say so. He was the guest of T. H
Galley while in the village.
Every old soldier who is not a sub
scriber to the UNION but wishes to So
cure a copy Of this issue containing
Judge Torrance's speech can get one
free by applying at this office. i
The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1896-06-04

JHAS. A. DlCKEY. ~ Y
Attorney for Judgment Creditor.
The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1896-06-04
Notice Of Expiration of Redemption.


TSEAI.1 80 -
The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1896-06-04

At the conclusion of the program the
parade reformed and marched to the
cemetery. Here the G. A. r. and Sons
formed at the Soldiers and Sailors
monument t site, supported by the other
orders. Commander Sausser, of the
Grand Army, and Captain Spaulding,
Of the S. of ", stepped into the hollow
square and conducted the beautiful
service used by these orders at the
cemeteries. The Cross supported a
number of Wreaths presented in mem
DRY Of prominent departed heroes and
at the conclusion of the ritualistic
work Col. Patterson read the inscrip-
tions. The Sons of Veterans fired a
farewell salute and then accompanied
the school children. who decorated the
graves. Then the march was resumed
and Judge Torrance escorted to the
The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1896-06-04

-. j. a. ROSS,
Plaintiffs Attorney, Princeton, Mimi
The San Francisco call., 1896-03-22
MR.. PAUsON WILL RETIRE.

A Member of Hyams, Pauson q Co.
Will Sever His Connection.
The announcement made few days ago
that Mr.. Pauson was to retire from the
firm of Hyams. Pauson & Co., was in the
nature of a surprise to the business world.
The firm is an old and we'll known one,
and has conducted stores in Portland, Sc
attle ard San Francisco for number OF
years past. During their existence the
house has become identified with the lead
ers in the clothing trade in the several
cities in which they have done business.
particularly in San Francisco.
The announcement made by the firm
that the dissolution would necessita te
holding sale at which material reduc-
tions in prices would be a feature was suffi-
cient to throng the store with customers
during the past week. It was realized that
the sale is genuine dissolution of copart-
nership sale, and hundreds have availed
themselves of the opportunity to invest in
clothing at manufacturers cost.
AS an illustration of the great cut in
prices that has been made, the manager OF
the store stated yesterday in an interview
that children's suits sold formerly at SIC
to $12 are now being sold at 50 IS, while
boys suits and overcoats, the former price
of which was SIS to $40, are now selling al
from 81 so to $40. The interest that has
been aroused in this sale will no doubt re-
main nabated until its termination.
The San Francisco call., 1896-03-22
HORACE HAYES ESTATE.
BUSINESS PROPERTY.
Ninth and Howard Streets.

Large and elegant piece Of business property on
the southerly corner of Ninth and Howard sts
comprlsing FIVE STORES and FIVE FRENCH
FLATS on Ninth st. and SIX RESIDENCES on
Howard st. This magnificent piece of busin ess
property has future outlook that cannot be ex-
celed in the city. Ninth st. is the coming promi-
south of Market st. business street. The size
Of this large and valuable lot. 100 feet Ninth by
1S5 feet Howard ST., cornering on Caroline ST.,
is one OF the largest pieces of property intact
in this city, and prominent corner 10 improve
with fine stores, grand hall, theaier and French
tenements-improved in this manner would make
it the best paying property in the city Capitalists
and speculators should examine this Full rents,
@428 per month. Cable and electric lines surround
the property. Stredts in basalt rock and accepted
by the city. Corner lot, 100x1S5 feet.
= ALSO Belonging to the same estate, southeaet
line of Howard, 225 feet southwest of Ninth street,
and southerly corner of Howard and Caroline
streets This valuable corner contains four French
flats. Full rents, $SS per month. This is good
property to improve with store below, which would
rent readily. Howard-street electric, Ninth and
Tenth street cable. Central location. Large lot,
Al :4x100 feet. Terms. both pieces, one-haf
cash, balance In one and two years; interest per
cent per annum.
The San Francisco call., 1896-03-22
REFEREES SALE.
THE MAGNIFICENT
MANSION,
Southeast Corner of O'Farre1l and
Cough Streets,

And lot 60x137 :6 feet, with L southeast cor
3Ox34 :415 feet. The subdivisions OF this man.
sion comprise saloon parlors. reception and dining
rooms and large hall, which open together, making
one grand room of the entire floor; kitchen, but
lers and other pantries, servants rooms, ETC., on
first floor annex: five large bedrooms, dressing
rooms, bathrooms, toilets, etc. on second floor;
space for three large rooms in attic; storerooms,
coalroom, wineroom and laundry in basement;
basement ,mented: large, handsome grounds;
streets bituminized and basalt rock: front walk
cement stone; surroundings cannot be exceed;
neighbors are of the frst-class order: car accom-
modatonS not excelled. Terms-Cash; lU per
cent at time of sale, balance upon confirmation by
Superior Court; deed at expense of purchaser;
tax for fiscal year lS96-97 to be paid by pur-
chaser. N. BIO examine this property please
obtain card from the auctioneers.
The San Francisco call., 1896-03-22
WANTED TO BURN 1T.
How the Henry Mayer Letter Came
Near Being Thrown Into the
Fire.

~
Rev. DR.. Williams considers it hasty to
give an opinion respecting the whitewash'
ing dispatches which DR.. Brown caused tC
be sent East, but he said yesterday. when
questioned on the subject, that any one
who felt aggrieved about the dispatches
had very simple remedy.
''Let such q person formulate charge
and lodge it with the committee on cre'
dentials of the Bay Conference. The sub
ject would then be investigated" he said
and when asked to name his authority fol
this assurance, DR.. Williams referred to
article VII, section 2. of the constitution
of the Bay Conference, which reads:
"When the standing of minister
or of a church of the conference is
called in question, it shall be the
duty of the committee on credentials tc
entertain specific charges. from response
BILE persons, to inquire into the case and
to report to the conference.
This article is part of the amended con-
stitution of the Bay Conference, which was
adopted in May, 1888. Previous to the
Brown scandal the committee on creden-
tials for 1895 and 1896 had had absolutely
nothing to do; but as the constitution is
the marching orders of standing COM
mittee it is now in order for the committee
on credentials to investigate the findings
of the council against DIR. Brown and re-
port to the Bay Conference, which meets
early in April. AS the meetings of the
committee would be private, it is by no
means improbable that the work of in
vestigation has already commenced.
When asked as to the jurisdiction of the
Bay Conference, DR.. Williams said it stood
to the council in the relation of Judge to
jury.
1.-The findings of the council, reported by
the committee on credentials, can be
passed on by the Bay Conference" he
said. THE conference can inflict suspen-
sion or expulsion from the ministry if it
considers Christening is necessary. The
council had no power to infIct these
things
DR.. Williams considers that both the
Valentine letter and the Henry Mayer let
ter were written by the same person, but
beyond that he was unwilling yesterday
to advance an opinion.
"When the letter was first laid before us
one of the lay members made motion to
throw it into the fire, but the motion was
not seconded. A good committee was ap-
pointed to investigate, but finding there
was no Henry Mayer they laid that state
ment before us without comment. After
that we were satisfied that the letter was
job work and poorly done, but we had no
jurisdiction to question DR.. Brown on the
subject, and never for moment enter
tanned the idea OF doing So"
The San Francisco call., 1896-03-22

not an intimidation of the young lady, but
an appeal by him 10 her to be just toward
him as he had been toward her.
l want further to say that would never
have taken SO active part in that church
council had it not been for DR.. Mclean
himself. When we we're together in the
railroad ticket Office under the Grand Ho-
tel he spoke to me and suggested that
represent DR.. Brown and that he would
take no advantage over the accused pastor
as he knew DR.. Brown was very sick man
and was not able physically to undergo
the examination and trial OF that case.
"Dr. Mclean then. when this question OF
this young lady came up, after his request
aforesaid, required that / leave the room,
and DR.. Brown was deprived of the counsel
which DR.. Mclean said he would allow
him, and that is the reason why the
question was not raised before the council
at the time the matter came up. fully
intended to raise it and would have raised
1t had not DR.. Mclean taken advantage of
me after his agreement with ME in the
railroad ticket Office. / consider that DIR.
Mclean owes me an apology for his con-
duct, but do not presume that he will
tender it.
II consider that it was the dnty of those
councilmen to defend DIR. Brown as much
as 1T was to persecute him as they did.
They admitted in the examination hear
say evidence and slanders Of the grossest
kind. l called their attention to it, OBJ
]ected to it and in every way that could
protested against it. They overruled my
objections, and some of them became vexed
when told that it was incompetent and
should not be admitted, and 1 was told
that the council had heard that class of
evidence previously in the proceedings,
and that they would have to continue it.
l replied, Because you have committed
one wrong against the accused is no rea-
son why you should continue to commit
other wrongs by listening to hearsay evil
dence,' but Mr.. Freeland arose and in his
Enthusiastically abrupt manner, while
l was speaking, said, 4 move that the
council proceed and the council pro-
ceeded.
Further than that, asked these gen.
tlemen what class of law they intended to
try the doctor by-whether by the law
taken from the divine Scriptures which
they teach or by the law prescribing rules
OF evidence as laid down in the municipal
law of the land. They could not answer
me, but told me to read the Bibie-that
they did not know what law they would
take; and | think they were right. They
did not know what law they were acting
under. In fact they went under no law
whatever, because if they had said they
took the Bible they would have found that
the word that they taught is the founda-
ton of all religion and justice, and directly
condemns the slanderer in the strongest
terms, and the class of evidence they ad-
mited against the unfortunate minister
would have been excluded.
''It is not necessary for me to say that
the municipal law of our country con-
demns hearsay evidence.
But if 1 am right in my conclusion 1
would say that they went to the pagan
laws, and from Caesar they got the remark
that minister should be, like Casar's
wife, above suspicion"