The Camden chronicle. (Camden, Tenn.) 1890-current, 1896-03-20
cHANcERY COURT.
Chancellor Abernathy mhs noon nusllT
Engaged Here This Week.

ANhUttIN court HlfN HflN hANh~
day, Chancellor a. j. Alternately,
Of Pulaski, presiding.
The following proceedings were
had up to noon yesterday:
w. A. Berry vs., Hattie Berry,
divorce; dismissed by complainant.
r.. B. White vs. III. T. Grim, bill
TO set aside conveyance; continued
until next term.
Tanner Carroll vs. Lee Carroll,
divorce; continued.
M. A. Townsend VS.. q. w. Town
send, divorce: dismissed.
S. L. Peeler vs. A. @. Shelton
bill & enforce collection of debts
and set aside fraudulent convey
ance; order TO try at next termof
court or dismiss
S. S. Capps VS. P. II. Capps. di-
vorce; order for complainant to ap-
pear and dismiss.
Chattanooga Plow Co. and Car
ter Dry Goods Co. VS. Biz Sandy
! Cooperative Association; order of
reference.
| Wilhelm VS. Deaton; decree for
complainant of title to land subject
to homestead of defendant
| A. q. Presson ct ais VS.. >. @. Hud-
son; death Of Presson suggested.
| Louisville and Nashville Rail.
road Co. VS.. w. X. Hicks ct ais; re-
manded for proof.
| Spencer ct ais vs.. Matthews ct
ais; rule upon parties to prepare for
trial by next term of court.
Walker ct ais vs.. Brevard and
Brevard vs., Walker; report of the
clerk and master confirmed.
l. n. Wilson VS.. T. S. johnson;
report and decree by consent in fa-
vor of Wilson for Sl25.
Richard VS.. Richard; motion. to
/ allowattachment without bond over
ruled.
The Hielmau Machine Works vs..
@. H. Crossnoe; order retiring case
from docket.
State of Tenpessee for use of D.
J. Allen for Benton County VS.. W.
J. Barnes; submitted to arbitration;
reference, clerk and master.
T j. Smith for use of T. B. Bar
, ker VS. sE. G. Allen; report of sale
confirmed, and title divested.
@. N. Sagen VS.. V. K. Harris ct
ais; decree resembling contract of
sale; appeal prayed and granted.
Union Bank and Trust Co. VS.. l.
IN. Bridges ct als;amended bill filed
and. case continued.
Richardson VS.. Rice ct ais; con-
: ktinued by consent.
T w. L. Holland VS.. j. B. Florence
; -et ais; jury ordered and case setfor
d ,frst,day of next term of court.
Farrar VS.. Farrar, contempt; dis
), bmissed.
o o. Shelton vs.. G. W. Shelton; re-
= port of receiver.
), r, L. Walker VS.. i, L. Walker;
order Of proeonfesso.
Il b. r. BreVard VS.. I. N. Walker,
g dismissed at complainant's cost.
J. d. M. Farmer VS.. George Farm
|, er, order Of reference; report con-
IS frmed and degree of sale.
Mum, Rutledge vs.<Georgia Rut.
Il ledge; suit dismissed without pref
udice.
! John Barnes ct ais VS.. D. J. Ora
. ham ct ais; 60 days allowed defend.
# ant to answer.
a Thomas B. johnson for the use
Is of Benton County VS.. ID. G. Hud.
son. ,Thiss case. brought up a very
= important question, involving the
!. constitutionality of Chapter 1877 oi
y = the Acts of 1896. The court de.
7 cided the act was constitutional, anC
4 decreed accordingly.
M. M. Brigance VS.. H. @. Brig
; ance; bill dismissed by complain,
" ant.
Barnes VS.. Flowers; report con.
m frmed.
r. Harrison vs. Evansville, PaducaE
re and Tennessee River Packet Co.
r continued.
IS Lockhart etals VS.. Snyder ct ais
y continued, awaiting payment of the
q, purchase money.
q Lille Rusbinget ais VS.. Horac,
a Rushing, andE. M. McAuley ct all
y. VS.. Horace Rushingset ais; repor
~ and exceptions.
Southern, Boiler Co. VS.. T. S
Johnsoni first report confirmed.
p "A Great German Remedy.