The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1896-03-20


The court charged the jury, among
other things. 'If they believed that the
80. .,,.hr,,,,,,. ,h, saio 90 tr.oxtcntinr
10" Prvhloi'ihs 'ne seie Vi '''oNl''','"e
liquors was In force in Justice precinct
W aud that th., defendant on or about
-. -, - ,,,hua 80 1,,y WINS
y, 'no 10y u a. s'1a rrnr,not did ell any in
m iorcs IN saiu ptecitho' uiu ss,'s+ine' nre
ioNicatng liquors IN me halu luss'Iy -
cihc'' or qln SCI any ih'o On IA 3sa ANY
subterfuge in the SAFE OF lhtoNlvnii.',s
liquors., then they VIII l'nu the uN.vndf'i ~
guilty; An ,e,xceptieh was ress e. W." ,,o
this charge. This charge auinotl~eu ,io
conviction of the defendant II ne MAJ.
sale at any time while the law was IN
force, or If he used any suhleriur E T., o.
rather rat comprehensise under the allie
cations of the indictment, mat the sh,e
was made to FawkeS. me cnaise oi ''e
court should have confined tho JURY ~
'nls NJ N.Y., n,i Henderson I
LOUIS DRESCHEL. from Parker; co II,
ylction Tor vioieI"E Stffs,r,ned
NV, ." ',,saa,,. H., tbts case il suf-
,,I,,', So n,,,n,.,ors ara urged 10
,.',,,'.,,~, l., a,.,sar,a ~ Tho order
.'..',e,,.,,., -, o-5o,,,g an
Oh 'he to'h'nlS9iVlle'' N'"iN
election for prohibition In SAID precinct
We deem 1t unnecessary to notice these
....,,,,t,,,.. ,,,,o,,so tho commissioners
~. i''lVl.S, w '."a" 't+,.;, ,,itnou, "a
Nuu.t may piu.l a. M, ,',,r,,se spI
pvuuoh presented LOT .i''1 ~ we" .nt ..r,I
NNsl SuNu vIpcl ~ .,.r.,,,5ar t,,
auI We cicrtltun a''u ,i'' rn,,i.
uiurr ~ ooiiV'uaihV ""it Arnoiiant
WI up' 70 ,,,.',Ii",r,i,,, a., atidsnrn
DsNtS''u 70 'le IN '',i"t ti, r'.,, 81 iha
81. w. V' ut,ln ''''T '"N ',,,,,,,ts tor,,,s
t'erilon' perAuse ne t 49, ~
c"ult "ll 'ui ututl Wy '",.i -. 49, ,nt
ttFnlt HIu .'tcHuSu ti'N W. - ~
S'",' - ~ l'H T. On iI.i ~, ros,nt ,sJ
iiu 'i1t' uS,te,,,t6 ig trr,,r,
nnl pIu'I us pup"t IlN''' !. ,i.'t, -
N'Ht on we t"uutF Jus 70 '".lt a. ~ 4, ,
ollUUr abl w 10" MI oido,od ~, 1mi,,
..ti lan' gu s,, , ,.r,,,.,,,ior ''''''''
sutIlcWut 20 5uppt4ia tno TI""''''0'
opinion ~ lie"uorSo" d.
,,r...,- ,,>,.-,,,,>- -. r..,,.. ...,,,,.i.,
w E'N ne it%h 10y t,a ,,,,,r
Reversed.
The court charged the Jury. "lf you be-
lieVc from the evidence that the defend
amt did ~ Lavaca county, ON or about
December q, 1895 cut and wound
Thompson with "A knife, such act was an
assault" This may or may not he true.
II tho act of cutting was unlawful it was
an assault; If not unlawful 1T was not an
assault The court further charged the
jury. ~ such an assault was made, vii
July. Intentionally and without laWtul
justification or excuse. Then the SANG
Was made on what the law terms malice
inns Is not u correct proposition SUP
posse that the prosecutor stamped the Jaws
% lhe accused, producing pam ana from
10 passion 1nIons,d in sjeh "a pr2E,9,e',,-
tnn ne Wiltuiiy ana Intentionally Killed
would such a killing necessarily oe upou
malice The court further instructed the
( lui{. Ana N addition TO henE mad"
with malice, II was made with the spr-
cin' intent to KIM, by he use of IA knife
on said Thompson. then such nu act was
al assault with intent to murder This
charge Is so framed as 10 leave I'm doubt
h',ier Inc court sHnR,lILet 10 we }nry
! inicnicd to knl. or w6ethrr tho court
charged tho jury as "a matter Of law.
/ lfcIirAted upon certain iaets. that the
V'i 10y W. nm ntS oi'" ~ NJ
! thnk II vas erroneous
/ opinion by Hurt T. I.
,,,,,,., ,,,, ,,,,,-,,,,,>
! lF.W II RAW foiti'' from rom Green,
| CONVECTION TOT cattle thclt-ieterSed-
The evidence tends strongly to show
! tbat TN, witness Williams recsivod ara
-, ,,'' - -, anu
concealed the animal knowing 1t to he
D stolen n n fact hp id upf .taq1 Tho