San Antonio daily light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1886-1907, 1896-05-05
NEWS OF THE COURTS.

THlhI -SE " ENIh DlSThlCT COUhI.
Judgment by default was rem.
dered in the following cases by
Judge Green this morning:
d. & A. Oppenheimer VS.. r. G.
Houston, note.
d. & A. Oppenheimer VS.. j.
Hobbs, on note.
Ronse & Wahlstab We. Joe Sheri-
dan, on sworn account.
j. +. Muegge & Co., VS.. Bielstein
& Richter, on sworn account and
note.
j. E. Muegge & Co., VS.. j. o.
Sullivan and G. g. Clifford, on
sworn account; judgment by
default against Sullivan.
August B. Critzer ct al, VS.. W.
G. Stillson, on note.
J. S. Thornton VS.. Samuel
Lytle ct al, on note.
San Antonio National bank VS..
w. III. Code, note.
Jack Kent VS.. Joe Clements, debt
and attachment.
>Texanna Hoover vs. John s.
Hoover, divorce.
G. w. Mills, administrator, VS..
Edwin J. Larken, note and FORE
closure.
James Hanlin VS.. Ida V. Todd,
notes and foreclosure.
Judgment for plaintiff was rem
dered in the following cases:
Mirtle Holmes VS.. Irwin Holmes,
divorce.
w. w. Wilson VS.. Hutscheson
and Frankel, appeal from Justice
court.
George Buck & Co. VS.. HI. 8 olins-
ky & Co., on sworn account.
M. S. Mark & Co. vs.. II. Solinsky
& Co., on sworn account.
Antoinette Martin VS.. Annette
Dwyer ct al, on note; dismissed at
plaintiffs cost.
Hiram II. McLane vs. John A.
O'Connor, on note; judgment by
agreement.
]. E. Scott VS.. Pansy Scott, d.
vorce; dismissed for want of prose-
cution.
Andrew Armstrong VS.. R. A,
Rich, garnishment; dismissed for
want Of prosecution.
B. M, Turner VS.. Maggie Turner,
divorce; dismissed under rule for
costs.
George Koerner vs.. Bowman and
Titus, on sworn account; judg-
ment against Bowman.
Joseph Sheern vs.. Lizzie Sum-
mers ct al, note and foreclosure
leave granted plaintiff to file suit
on pauper's affidavit.
FoRTY-FIFTH DISTRICT COURT.
j. l.. Crowleigh VS.. San Antonio
Street Railway Co., damages argu-
ment begun.
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS.
Motions submitted-G. c. and
s. F. Ry. Co. VS.. w. r. Cole, from
Dallas, for rehearing; l.. A. Ellis
VS.. City OF Cleburne ct al, from
Johnson, for rehearing.
NEW SUITS FILED.
George R. Hines, guardian, ct al,
appellants, VS.. Frank j. Schreiner
and Albert NJ. Schreiner, appellees,
appeal from Probate court.
E. E. Evans VS.. Lucy Trash ct al.
injunction, to restrain the sheriff
from Ievying on property on cor
ner OF North Flores and Kingsbury
streets.
r. NJ. Fuller VS.. Emma Fuller,
divorce; alleging outrageous cruel
treatment. They were married on
June %, 1895. Plaintiff is a rail-
road man.
Elizabeth MCGEE ct al. We. w. j.
B. Patterson, trespass to try title
and for damages.
Francis Smith & Co. VS.. II. r.
Cocker, on note.
Francis Smith & Co., VS.. T. ]
Dodson, note.
VIM. Kuhlmann, vs.. Mary X.
Merideth, hote and foreclosure.
AUGUST MIERow's WILL.
The last will and testament of
the late August Mierow was filed
this morning. Deceased willed
that his funeral expenses and all
Just debts be paid out Of the estate
with as little delay as possible az
ter death. He bequeathed to
his brother, Charles Mierow, his
life insurance policies, amounting
to $4,000. He desired that the
courts shall have nothing more to
do with the settlement Of the es-
tate than may be absolutely pos
sible. Deceased appointed Mrs.
Kea Mierow executrix, requesting
that she be not required to give
bond. Mrs. Kea Mierow has filed
application for appointment as