Arizona silver belt., 1896-02-01

Reno road district No. 4, for the year 1895, was read and the same accepted, and n balance of $49.50 being found due, and it was thereupon or dered that warrant for that amount issue upon said road district in favor of F. H. Powers.
 | Report of s. A. Haught, overseer | Rye road district No. 5, for the year 1895, was read and tho same found cor rect, and accepted.
 1 The report of J. 0. Robbins, over seer Upper ToDto road district No. G, was read, and his report being incom- plete. the same not heinz in items and the receipts and stubs being wanting, the clerk was directed to return same to the overseer, directing him to make detailed report and produce the neces- sary vouchers.
 The report of Jas. Callahan, over seer of Payson road district No. ', was read and allowed as follows A balance being found in favor of the said district and against the overseer in the sum of $3, l5, the clerk was directed to notify said overseer to make payment thereof { to the treasurer of GIla county on ac- count of said district.
 The report of w. J. Fuller, overseer Pine road district No. s, was read and accepted, and balance of S80.60 be- ing found due the overseer, it was ordered that warrant be drawn upon the said district for said amount in favor of W. j. Fuller.
 The overseer of Pioneer Road dis trict No. 9, c. c. Hockett, having failed to file his report, the clerk was directed to notify said overseer to make aud file said report for the year.
 Oh hotiOhy " ID hon Ct tuat tnC offices of the several county road dis tricts be, and the same are hereby de- clared vacant.
 The petition of George Wright and others, to segregate Grapevine road district aud forming new road dis trict from Pinal creek to Pinto creek. was read and on motion, and by unan- imous vote, Summit road district No. II was created with the above boundaries with fifteen miles of road; the habili- ties of Grapevine district to be equally apportioned between the two districts of Grapevine and Summit.
 On motion of Supervisor Stewart, and by unanimous vote, Rye road dis trict was segregated at Rye postoiiice, thus creating two road districts, the lower portion to be known and called as formerly, Rye road district No. 5, and the upper portion to be known and called the OK Bow road district No. 12, the funds in Rye district No. 5 to be equally apportioned between the two road districts last named.
 On motion, and by unanimous vote, it is ordered that a warrant in the sum of S39. B, against Grapevine road dis trict No. 3, in favor of A. J. Hen derson, issue.
 On motion, and by unanimous vote, it is ordered that warrant in the sum of S39. B against Summit road district No. II, in favor of A. J. Henderson, issue.
 On motion, overseers of the several road districts of the county were ap- pointed and their bonds fixed as fol lows;
 Chas. F.. Finley, overseer of Globe road district No. l, with bond 5000
 N. H. Price, overseer of Stanton road district No. 2, with bond $500.
 George Wright, overseer of Grape vine road district No. 3, with bond $500.
 F. H. Powers, overseer of Reno road district No 4, with bond $500.
 l.. P. Cole, overseer of Rye road dis trict No5, with bond $500.
 W. c. Colcord, overseer of Payson road district No. 7, with bond $500.
 W. J. Fuller, overseer of Pine road district No. 8, with bond $500.
 II. J. Banner, overseer of Pleasant Valley road district No. 10, with bond $500.
 N. H. Livingston, overseer of Summit road district No. II, with bond $500.
 W. P. St. John, oyerseer of OK Bow road district No. 12, with bond $500.
 The unapportioned money in the county road fund was then apportioned as follows:
 Globe road district No. 1. ....... .S147 Stanton read district No. 2........ ... h2 Grapevine road district No 3...... 75 Reno road district No. 4. 112 Rye road district No. 5........... 60 Upper Tontu road district No. 6. "A Pavson road district No. 80 Pine road district No. 8. ....... 100 Pioneer road district No. 9. ........ 80 Pleasant Valley road district No. 10 30 Summit road district No. II *. 75