New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1896-01-15
A DRY TERM OF COURT.
The 1n:ererting Gases are Few and Far
Between.

6
The ln:ererting Cases are Few and Far.
Between. ls &
Court IS still being held in this city
andwill most likely continue all Of the
present week
The disposition made Of cases thus far
is as follows:
To be tried luring vacation Rudolph
vs.. Herian, Pfaender VS.. Wicherski, Ar.
mold vs.. Hanschen, Christensen Is. Frantz
Pfaender vs.. Filzen, schwarzrock vs..
schwarzrock.and Gabriel vs.. schroepfer.
Settled out Of court: Tape s schriet
or VS.. Henningsen, Pelzel vs.. John Hager
and Dohrman VS.. Heideman.
|. The case of Hackert vs.. Roger and
others was tried, Sommerville and Olsen
appearing for plaintiff and John Lind
for defendant. A verdict in favor of the
defendant was rendered. no cause Of ac.
|tion. ~. i. e {.
& In the appeal OF. Geo. Vo1lmer against.
the Supervisors Of Stark, Somerv,1ille:: &
Olsen. for the appellant gave notice to
lauash proceedings and the court sus,
lItained tie notion. -: -: a. ,$,:::s
The suit of Eberl vs.: :Peterl: was. one:
over an account stated, in which. -Eberl
claimed. that Peterl, his, ,father-in-law,
owed him something like 500. Stein
hauser appeared TO. Peterl and Somer-
vile s. Olsen for the plaintiff. The case
went>t to the Jury on Friday but after re-
naming OF: all night they failed to agree
and were discharged. The, case will
come up again at the next term.
Following this came the case of the
County Commissioners VS.. Cecilia Wal
bel, case brought to recover $50 i.
month for oyer eleven months for refus-
ing to support two of her grandchildren
upon the order Of the county board. Coun-
| ty Attorney Days conducted the case for
the commissioners anu Jos. A. Eckstein
for the defendant. The point in question
is one that has never before been argued
in; this state and Mr.. Eckstein's argument
in favor of its unconstitut1onality and in
justice was conceded by the attorneys
present to have been logical and able.
1.-THE matter went to hejury however and
III a short. while returned verdict for
the defendant cause of action.
Geo; Yollmer's suit against Ed. Hum
Itplhrey for: tearing away his fences and
! digging up his land in an efortto build
| atread has occupied the attention of the
court since Saturday, going to the jury
Elast evening. someryille is attorney for
tie plaintiff IS 4; and Lind for the defendant.
f. The only remaining civil cases on the
calendar are those Of the Eagle Mill Co
] "a. .Dillmapn and others, Chas. Klotz, as
Iadministrator, vs.; the Winona s St. Pc.
1 ter railroad Co. and the Sioux CITY En-.
Igipe AID Iron Works VS.. John NJ
[sehroepfer and John: Groebner respect:
lively. -. a.:
t The only criminal case was that a.
l5gainst Geo: vo1lmer, charging assault
upon Ed. Humphrey. The jury returned
\ q verdict Of mot guilty"
). !: ;fhe jury in the case of Vollmer VS.
+ Humphrey returned verdict for Voll.
mer, assessing his damages at 6 cents.
+ / Annual Meetings.
+ Brown County Bank: Directors, John
c.: Rudolph, Joseph Bobleter, E. T.
Koch, John Limo, Peter Schere1,, Chas
L. .Roos and II. G. Garvin; president,
------ : - vice-president,
-; cashier, E. G. Koch; assistant
cashier, F. H. Krook.
! Citizens Bank: Directors, J. H. Vajen,
Geo. Decline, Werner Bosch, Ferd.
Crone, M. Mullen, O. M: Olsen and. Chas.
Silverson; president, NJ. Mullen; vice
president, ]. H. Vajen; cashier, w. E.
Koch.
Evangelical Church Society: Presi-
dent, VIM. Wellner ST.; secretary, Otto
Tape; treasurer, Jacob Spaeth; trus-
tees, Herman Kiesling, Adolph Schill1ng
and Chas. Boehme; special committee,
| VIM. Thiedemann, Samuel Marti, J. H.
Tape, Albert Spaeth and Louis Sandau
.Maennerchor: Director, VIM. Pfaen-
der Jr.; president, Chas. Morbitz; vice.
president, VIM. Winkelmann; secretary,
Carl Rachel; treasurer, Frank Burg Jr.:
flag-bearer, FIR. Vogel.
Hunters Club: President, Peter Herr
an; secretary, VIM. Pfaender Jr.; treas
urer, Chas. Hauenstein; chief Of hunters,
John Lila; assistant, John Hauenstein
il. .s t'