Daily capital journal. (Salem, Or.) 1896-1899, 1896-02-11
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT.
Docket Entries in Judge Burnetts
Department-Other Matters.

The grand jury, after two hours
presented themselves to the court
with a true bill against Lee, the Chi
naman charged with larceny in g
warehouse on January 20, viz: two
bales Of grain sacks, the property OF
the Salem Touring mills, valued al
about SIG. Lee was brought up from
his quarters in the county jail shortly
afterwards and a%rraigned.
DOCKET ENTRIES.
Pacific Lounge & Mattress Co. VS..
Keller & Sons, action for money; de-
fault and judgment.
The Salem Light & Power Co. VS..
The Salem Consolidated Street Rail-
way Co., action for money; default
and judgment.
George n. Sroat ct al VS.. Lucretla
Burton, adtion for money; motion of
plaintiff to strike out part Of answer
Macondry h Co. vs.. Keller & Sons.
action for money; default of defend
ants entered.
Jerome G. Gingrich VS.. Christian
Kurtz, action for money; default and
Judgment with order to sell attached
property.
Henry II. Sleyers VS. Samuel b.
Brown, action for money; demurrer to
complaint.
Ladd & Bush VS., George Williams,
ct al, action for money; plaintiffs
demurrer to plea I'm abatement filed
by the Williams & England Bank
ing Co.
CD. Whitaker VS.. On. Richardson,
action for money; continued for SER
vice.
Allen & Lewis VS.. j. A. VanEaton,
action for money; default and judg-
ment with order tosell attached prop
erty.
Il. Writ VS.. oregon Wholesale Muir
sery Co., ct al, action for money;
motion Of defendants Except VIM.
Writ to strike out part Of complaint
overruled as to first specification and
sustained as TO second.
j. G.. Miller VS.. b. Dimick, appeal
from Justices court, Aurora district,
plaintiffs motion TO dismiss appeal.
j. Nj. VIII VS.. A. Beach and G.. w.
whitney, same; demurrer to COM
Tlaint.
WI. Huffman VS.. John Knight,
motion to correct journal entry
allowed so as to require the clerk TO
enter q Judgment nunc pro tune as OF
date October %, 1895, for plaintiff as
to property not undivided or for value
thereof I'm case delivery cannot be had
and for costs and disbursements and
for defendant dlsmissing action as to
undivided property.
II. Y. Lansing w. Plummer 4 Ault
and ii. Holden, motion by defendants
for new trial oyerruled and judgment
for plaintiff on p~leadings.
VIM. Horn ct al, appellants, vs.. Il. |
&. Provost ct al; appeal from Justices
court, action for money; defendants
motion TO dismiss appeal.
Henness Bros. VS., Allen Il Smith
and Searle & Deane; action for money
continued.
j. Il. Cook vs.. w. ii. Byars; suit for
the recovery OF personal property and
damages; defendants motion for
to file second amended answer.
j. n. Skate, administrator Of the
OF ID. Nj. Keene, VS.. Il. j. Nico-
lot; replevln: plaintiffs motion 10
out part of answer. Continued
for term.
Il. l.. Sabln vs.. G. w. Kearns ct al,
for money; default and judg-
ment as TO John Kearns. Non-suit by
plaintiff as to G.. w. Kearns.
Pacific Land q Orchard Co. VS.. w.
ii. Wild, action for money; motion TO
out complaint confessed with
leave 10 amended complaint. Settled.
The Resented Smith Co. Ia corpora
ton VS.. W. A. Benson, action for
money; default and judgment with
order TO sell attached property.
John Slough VS.. liver Larson, action
for money; plaintiffs motion TO strike
out part of amended answer argued.
ChaS. Becke VS.. Geo. IL. Saubert,
for money; continued for SER
vice.
Mailman & MangOld VS.. Grant S.
Manning, action for money; default
aud Judgment with order TO sell at
property.
j. II. Thompson a. Co. VS.. Amelie
replevin; plaintiffs demur-
rer To second separate answer argued
and sustained.
Silverton and Portland Land Loan
aud Investment Co. vs.. j.. Il. Ham.
mond, action for money; demurrer TO
complaint oyerruled.
Hugh l.. McNaTy, receiver OF the
Williams 4 England Banking Co, VS..
Geo. Williams, action for mOney;
amended demurrer TO complaint filed
Oy consent.
John +. Miller VS.. Mary j. Crayton,
for money; plaintiffs demurrer
To separate answer, also motion TO
out part of answer.
Jessie Il. RohTer VS.. Isabel and
Charles Simon, action for money; de-
murrer OF Isabel Simon to complaint.
Standard Shoe Co. VS.. c. w. Bead
\ Son, action for money; default and
Judgment.
Il. Jacobson vs.. A. +. Savage, action
Tor money; demurrer to complaint
JNerruled and Judgment for plaintif.
X. l.. Sabin VS.. Keller Il Sons, action
money; default OF defendants
entered.
Ladd \ Bush VS.. Geo. Williams et
H., plaintiffs demurrer TO plea An
abatement sustained.
I. ID. Humphrey VS.. j. l.. Shorey ct y
H., default aud Judgment.
state vs.. Nj. Palmer, cOntemnt NJ