The Lambertville record. [volume] (Lambertville, N.J.) 1872-1968, 1896-10-07
THE FARMERS REAL GRIEVANCE.

Not q Lack of Money In the Country, but
of Banking Facilities In Country Dis
tricts-Mr. Shearman's Proposed Rem
edy.
Why has Canada no currency ques-
ton, no cry for cheap money and no
campaign against gold? These are ques-
tions which Mr.. Thomas G. Shesrman
answers very effectively in the London
Times Of Sept. IL.
Briefly summarized, Mr.. Shearman's
explanation Of the discomfort among
farmers, which has lead to the ridicu-
lous demand for free silver, is that most
farmers in the west and south are de-
prived Of the benefits of banking facili-
ties. They seldom see or use check
and are unacquainted with the benefits
of banks and bank credits. For this
reason there Is great scarcity OF cur
rency in most rural districts. The
country store" supplies in part and In
a crude and costly way the credits
which tide many farmers over from one
season to another. Because Of the great
risk involved, the storekeeper, by charg-
ing high prices for his goods and by
paying low prices for farm products,
really gets from % to 40 per cent inter-
est on the credits given to the farmers.
OF course such interest eats up all OF
the profits of large class Of farmers.
The country storekeeper really does o
banking business in q clumsy and cost
" way. Local banks, such as exist In
Canada, would furnish the farmers
with credits at about onefourth the
cost of store credits. With such banks
the farmers could sell their crops for
checks, deposit them in banks and take
up their discounted notes in this way.
The farmer knows nothing of this
method Of conducting transactions and
thinks that his needs can be supplied
only by making more money--cheaper
money if necessary.
The farmers, therefore, make no
efforts to obtain better banking facili-
ties Instead they work and vote
against banks and bankers at every OPP
portunity. They tax money and other
loanable capital at 3 or az per cent
while demanding that interest be re-
duced to 2 per cent. They thus drive
away the very money they are SO eager
to get. In some sections of the south 1t
is SO or rs miles to the nearest bank.
They prohibit branch banks, such as ex-
ist in Canada and Scotland to the great
advantage of remote country districts.
The farmers themselves are the great
est enemies to what is most needed in
their communicating first class banks of
deposit and discount. Mr.. Shearman
makes this point clear. He says that
Canadian farmers ''haVe suffered from
the fall OF prices and from every other
alleged result of the single gold stand
ard to the same extent as the farmers
south of them. Yet there ia no bimetal-
lie league in Canada, and the cry for
cheaper money is not heard. Canada
has not only enough money to supply
all of her own wants, but also lends
such great amounts in the United States
that jealous American bankers some
times try to shut Canadian money out "
Mr.. Shearman sees what too few
seem to see--that the farmers have a
real monetary or currency grievance
He has indicated what is probably the
only way of giving relief. He offers
something positive. That the farmers
are not willing to take the only remedy
for their ills and q fer the qnaek free
silver and cheap INDY remedies only
prolongs their suiferinGa and makes q
rational solution of the money question
more difficult and uncertain.
Which, Which?
In communities where wageworkers