The San Francisco call. [volume] (San Francisco [Calif.]) 1895-1913, 1896-05-27

the nrst Monday after the LIST day OF January,
1880, ne has been, and now is, the duiy
eiecteo, qualified and acting Assessor OF sald
ifornia.
That between the first Monday in the month
OF 9ao March, 1885, and the goth day OF July,
1850, SAID John d. Siebe as such Assessor pre-
pared and completed an assessment-book in
wnlcn ne purported to have listed and assessed
S gu properly within the City ana county OF
eau francisco subject to assessment ana TAX
atlon within said City and County OF San
Francisco Tor the fiscal year commencing July
l, 1919, and in which he purported to have set
uo Mh ana assessed the same at Its iuil caSn
value, and which purported to contain the
matterS and things required by section oo0o
Oh Ihe Pontlcal Code of the State OF California
~, nat on the 10th day of July, 1889 ana sfter
the completion of said assessment book of the
HSlty ana county of San Francisco, state OF Cal
norma, SAID John D. Siebe, as such Assessor,
appeared before Hon. James NJ. Trout, VINO
then and there was the duly elected qualified
ana acting Judge of the Superior Court OF the
It.y ana county Of San Francisco, state OF Cal,
norma, ana who as such then and there nad
authority to administer such oath, and then
ana there before the said Hon. James NJ.
Iroutt. as such Judge after the administration
70 MIN Dy such Judge of an OATH said John D.
Siebe, as such Assessor did wilIfully, corruptIy,
falsely and feloniously subscribe, depose, swear
ana make oath to the truth OF certain afhda-
VII ana the matter and things therein con-
tanned, said affidavit so su bseribed and sworn.to
pelng then and there entered upon said assess
ment book and being in words and figures as
follows:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss
City and County of San Francisco
4, Jonn d. Siebe, Assessor in and for the City
ana county OF San Francisco, do swear that be-
tween the first Monday in March and the first
Mohday IN July, 1895, have made diligent in
curry ana examination 10 ascertain all the prop
erty within the City and County aforesaid subject
70 assessment by me. and that the same has been
assessed In the assessment book, equally and uni
iormly, according to the best of my Judgment and
peuei at It's tul cash value and that have faith
fully compiled with all the duties imposed on the
Assessor under the revenue laws, and that have
noI imposed any unjust assessment through malice
or Ill WILL nor allowed any 70 escape Just as
sessment through favor or regard.
subscribed and sworn to before me this 2Oth day
OF Juys 1880. JAMES NJ. TROUT,
Judge of Superior Court.
JOHN u. SIEBE,
Assessor OF the City and County OF san Francisco
Whereas, in truth and in fact, as the said
john ID. Slebe as such Assessor then and there
well knew, all the property situated within
the City and County of San Francisco, State of
California, subject to assessment by him as
sueh assessor Tor the purposes OF taxation for
said fiscal year beginning July l, 1895, had
not peen assessed upon said assessment book
equally and uniformly according to the best OF
his Judgment, information and belief at its
full cash value, in this that on, at and prior to
II O'Clock meridian of the first Monday in
March, 1893. one William T. Wallace, residing
at 799 Van Ness avenue, said City and County
OF san francisco, was and continually after