New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1896-04-05
- o,.orv o,ber restriction which it places

adonted in every other restriction "h'V" - pun
II provides. for instance ihat no Hquo n,cres or
sold on premises where drAkoo1ts' bcrc made TO
provisions are sold. NO attempt - nr r or rro-
res,rict the sale of dryeoods. erocrI"S, I;;o,iors
visions. but simply to reStrce t hn nroyided that
In Ike manner It might have pee'i phoro food Is
10 iinuors shall be sold premises whel. ~ S no
given away, thus carrying out tnc trafc in
measure in regulating ana Testr'ot,n ,o av'av of
Iinuors instead OF restricting the SN'hs away
food premises where liquor is so,1 of the stat
| advise however. that THIS provision "a ,,n,u Tho
uto ike ali others be strictly observed nhtn lie
question OF its validity shall have oe'h ''''''"''
You also ask for my opinion as to the ris" a. ~
duties Of hotel propTieiors under 10 have omen
Section 81. which makes ii unlawiu 10 iva, na erect
nv unlocked any door or entrance from the sir,',
alley yard hallway. room or adjoining so,d or
the room rooms where any hIu I thc saie OF
kent for sale during the hours whsh NE o. ~
liquors is forbidden by this act IN m, e' of nn,,ors
saloons and other places where me Sa. q, az casv
;s strictly Forbidden at certain times II Is an 80
matter to comply with this provision; pu nrhddnn "x
of a hotel in which such SAFE II no, ,nncb I'M
cent under certain circumstances IL Is "c"-"e" '
possible to literally obey the statuie rr.,,inr n
II should be noted that the statu'c III g a'r an
the nronrjetor of a hcic, The right 10 sell iiiuT' -"
Sunday 10 the guests of his ho.i al mel no, n,
in their rooms or apartments thfIch'. ~ ho,cl
The harroom or other similar room OF me noa .
does not confer upon such proprielo, i -, ssrrv.
ilege but renders IL obligatory upon mIn ~ 20
his guests In the manner prescribed ms my - "a -
the guest Is absolute as Is that OF observation-disclosures
and should the landlord fail III the " .,'', Tor
,hereof me guest would have right OF aclloh ,o'
damages. These two PROVISIONS OF enS o.her The
one nrovIdes that he shall serve the guest WIN
nonors AT his meals In his rooms WiIlF W,
ntber makes il unla Nfu for him 70 enter the roo .
where the liquors kept. in order 10 opta''' 49,
NAV be required by the guest al aI'S p''' -
chamnarnes and many other KINDS OF WIN ga
knnt in refrigera tors. which arc permanently IN
in The barroom and such goods cannot be remover
int IN another room over Sunday. $780,, Tin
7 am therefore Of opinion. that II wou'I n' ~
and req soma bic construction OF TINS stature 10 o,
tbat the Legislature ended TO establish gen a.
rnIe throughout the State prohibiting IN" Saie y,
uouors on SUNDAY and incidentally proVlilhe un'
III nlaces whore LIQUOR Is shall be closed p,l Han
Ine made ono exception 10 the general RUE, W.
IL eaia of linrors in hotels to guests th"i,oi nv
rcht IN serve such guests in an ord"rlE anu pi,l.
manner mus, bc implied. and That the proNls'om
Which makes IL unlawful to enter the par'"cl" "
sunday must be modified by implication 20 me - ~
tent OF rendering ii possible" TO carry ou' W." ~
nro,.isIon I'm A reasonable and practl'dhle way III
In nj her words that the hotel proprietor s.""'n
be allowed 10 have bartender IN the baIroom o,,
Sunday for the purpose Of serving the waters WI
whateyer liquors may be ordered by the guests d"
their meals or In their rooms. 1900, 49, harroo,n
The screens should he removed ana me 9ariop,p
,or, Tn sl view OF the street. ana IL snouln p' w"
Heppstood that no should enter the partoo"'
went the bart ender and the walters e., a.. d,
Snce writing the above have heei hioIrI'u 'l'i a
,ho c'ornoratlon Counsel concurs In the views apor
nxnressed as to the right OF the proprietor 10 ''''
me barroom for the purposes mentioned