Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1896-05-13


80 cannot be but your desire 10 %
lave it dontl you viii please perceive
that 10 has bauu Impossible Tot me ut
set 60 give a urflnito time Wwnru The
contract will DO lct,n until aurh pre-.
uminnty wofl, ls done, leg OF you 90
please not imagine that ! Wish 10
elbow my own horn" yet since MY
arrival here have worked over elk.
teen hours out VI my lwenty-ionf
on such plans aud schedule
and willingly would do more %
| could Htand ~, ana iurihub u
/ may DO permitted TO state, an
Just a. anxious as you can doHifo and
use every oudeavof not 90 throw sway
any time or money fo0iishlyi EXCEL
TO uto your advantage solely. The
understanding arrived At (penulnR
your approval) With II. d. Of Tue
county committee Is ns iOllowt that ]
am 20 ndd % rCr cent 10 our iist Ificr
on total amount Of contract, n which
20 pur cent 10 70 % tue members Of
committto Ani . PER cent 10 the atChi.
tol and 90, with wu 10 receive 10 Iut
cent above list pflCof, the total amount
OF contract 10 be- paid Tor Ia ucal
aud certain sums tg be paid NJ
such tmua during the C0nsituc
ton OF work ~ you may with - dcsig-
nttO and have pat in contract. l cau-
not a. yet definitely state the amount
total FOR county part VI buildins, but
believe that Il will be- from so. 900 90
SO, 600, aud for city rari uu,hy aH
much more. iehnll 10 obliged 90 have
you on receipt Of this letter wire mu u
such arrangement Il tatlBiac,1ty 10
you. ne stated before the county will
10Y oaah, but tho oity at present Do
rather hard up, but tho council have
passed, and In fact the ruutimguil OF
the whole people here are Tor 10 aud
will send the mayor and a committee
on 10 Washington 10 help Cougfusi-
man from hereto have Congress Taa'
an enabling pct 10 Increase thu UOnupd
valuatlon of the city . per cent, which
% tattcd by CongIr11 will give 60. the
oily the "whefc n with" 10 nl81 BOY
hash aud 40 ahead at once. AZ any rtio
We will by having the county part,
surely have the city psfl-uvcu n later
on. In another letter enclosed / fci.
pUutully submit the information you
desire regarding court housn at Grand
Haven, 40 nlso request for certain IN.
formation and prices OF articles 90
mentioned, and p0eslble uteiel for
court house here-fequosting antwer
by return mall.
That my request 10 "peraonaly re-
gard correspondence iIom here, may
bAye been surprising to you, mpy be-
now satisfactory answered by your
statement that "Mf. Cauburn iH no
longer with youn-ior had heard
from confidential letters wfitlon by
him 10 certain parties here that such
would happen, nnd have ioii that
perhaps accidentally he might have
access TO my correspondence TO your
Company, ana 40 Rs 10 avoid possible
competition nrising from such thought
II best TO "Ruhri from"
In conclusion / mention that Mf.
Thompson has his contract with coun-
~ commissioners signei snd nov on
his way 10 New Oflean1 and sxptclb
TO return from there 10 here IA about
two weeks " work ON city contract. A
LITTER received from Mr.. Caty-nlsO on
tOday-wlll 10 conveyed by mo on
tOmorrow--aiter consulting attorney In
De dOlyor mattef--aa he requested.
Hoping TO hear from you, believe me
10 be,
Yours very respectfully,
n. HAYICEH.
P.B.-wbat n anything have you
bosn pleased to do about "Droyet9"
Tho Initials 'H. B.n In tho letter
were, sccordiug 10 the wltnsss, prlba.
hlv meRutiur -. H., 90. M.,h or ~.
X. M,n Judge Powers suggested that
they possibly were intended 10 mran
Herman Hamburger, but Hayksn was
very sure that they did not and thai he
might have made q mistake la writing.
Judge Powers resumed the ofoss-
examination Of llaykbn nj O'Clock
this afternoon, but he had asked only a
question or two whom he discovered
tnst the defendant WA not present.
ExptetBing his regret TO the court for
the delay accustomed by MIR. Morfisis
absence, Judge Powers announced
that o couple Of gentlemen were noW
~ queet OF the defendant and " was
expected that no would coon oomo Ia.
10 was 2!2b when Nc. Morris appeared
and the trial proceeded with.
Witness Haykcn testified that DO
could not explain why he had put into
that letter the initiate Of Herman
Hamburger Instead OF those Of joseph
II. Morris; did not have Hamburger Ia
his mimi at tile timo 0f writing;
Morris had TALKED with him previous
W hNUANAa ~ ANNNH AHHN ANA INAH
centnRe; Morris had never asked for
20 per cent, neither had he offered 10
let 10 Per cont 20 TO tho firm OF
Andrews a 70. over and above the true
amount Of the bill ayainlt the county
when I wtOle that letter / had NOS
figured up the total amount of the con.
tract; DOM remember that In my d.
rect examination / said my lrst talk
with MOtrlH on percentage had been
Hubsoquout to the date OF the letter.
Witness, however, admitted having
testified yesterday tuEt Morris asked
him 10 figure the cost oi the contract
10 January or February, 1894. hud ~
that time he wrote 10 tho h0useaB 10 tho
percentage. Also that the talk on per.
ceningo with Morris was hai alter
tho figures u the contract were com.
plotDu AMI that these tu.aia hud not
been figured up whom he wrote that
letter TO the arm on January lilh,
WitAspB cOntlnuUI.--My Met CONVEX.
saiion with Morris on tho percentage
proposition did not include any other
person or pgnOni; afterwards Morn,
asked por cent Tor the hTC4i,ep, aud /
virtually mace contract o. ihnt SUD;
dld u0t pay Morris nny money 10 boo ap,
piled on thb nrchi,Cgl'd o per Gem;
,tho only man who demanded my
"rakt.0n" In 1894 was Joseph A. Mua
re; / remember that tho Hrm ha4
written Ia reply 10 my letter OF Jauu.
airy IAN that % peg cent vas pretty
steer.
Too letter was shown 20 lIugi.pu aal