The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1896-02-12
ANDY EHRICK'S WIFE
She Wants a Divorce From Her HuS-
bind Who Is in the Pm.
MRS. SAMPLES COMPLAINT
The Suit of Ebert Bell Against
Marguerite Eell-Aliports Estate
Mrs. BelIevllle and the cald-
ed Cow -Court Notes.
RS. SAMPLES COMPLAINT

Mrs Addie Ehrick, wife OF Andrew
I,brick the murderer of old Mike Gill
more. has become more than reconciied
tn her husbands incarceration in the
nenitentiary, for yesterday she COM
menced an action for divorce against
Ebrick on the ground that be was con-
victed of a felony and is now serving
term of one year in the penitentiary for
r,anslaughter. Mrs Ehrick recites In
her complaint that they were married
at Silver Bow in 1898. They have
child 16 months old whose care ana
custody she asks Ehrick Will soon
complete his term in the penitenudry.
+ s Booth, one of the attorneys VINO
prosecuted Ehrick, is Mrs. Ehrlch at
torney.
Mary A. Sample yesterday com
menced an action for divorce IN the
district court against G. w. Sample 10
whom she was married at Radersburg,
Jefferson county Mont, April 70, lsos'
She relates that she has been resi-,
dent of the state for 10 years anu
charges the defendant with cruel anu
inhuman treatment. ON Dec. d. 'c'l'
while they were living in Fergus couh-
tv. he struck her in the face ana on
the body with his fists, and used cruel
and abusive language toward her.
Similar acts of cruelty were luIllcteu
on her at different times subsequently,;
on June 2, 1892, he deserted her ana
has since lived separate and apart from
her and has contributed nothing 10 hei
support since that time.
| In the divorce suit of Ebert y. Ben
| against Marguerite *. Bell, the plain
| tiff Yesterday filed an athdaVlt Tor the
| publication of sumons and alleges that
| the defendant deserted him on Jan. So'
| 1895. and left the state on the ISL Gay
| az
| Eighth street, Oakland, from "hlch
place he received a letter from her on
the 9Th of last November. An order
| for the publication was made.
| The Silver Bow National bank yes
| terday brought suit against Jonn l'uck-
lev and T. NJ. Lowry for $l,35l.25 due as
| principal and interest on a note dated
| JuIv Is. 1892 An attachment was Is
sued. The same plaintiff also sued john
| Hambly for $50, due on a note dated
on the 10th of the present month.
John Scrowcroft & Sons company OF
Salt Lake, brought an action against
b. F. Locke for $i46.15, due on account
OF the amount $42.75 was assigned ny
another Salt Lake firm.
The Bradley Metcalf company sued
John Hambly yesterday for $i05.,i, and
NJ. D. Wells & Co. brought an @ctlof
against A. Ducharme Il co. for S3t3lo
A Judgment for SS14.54 by default was
| entered IN the case VI n l'sAS'N -
against r.. S. Miller.
Caroline V. Kelly of Basin. sister Of
the late John d. AllpoT,, and admins
tratriX of his estate, yesterday com
menced an action in the district cour
| against William c. Brandt to set ASIDE
| and annul a deed to fourth interest II
the Minnie Healy lode claim. on. Oct
20 last Airport gave Brandt a deed e
the interest described, but Mrs. Kelly
saws she has reason to believe that tn
deed was not intended to be an absolute
one but that the property was decided
to Brandt to be held in trust by him.
In Judge Speer's court yesterday TN
ticket broker case of the state agains
A. Pincus was continued indefinitely
because the Northern Pacific railroa
| company, which is the real prosecution
in the case, could not find its witnesses
The case against Mrs. Belleville wa
| dismissed on motion of the county al
| torney. Mrs. Belleville had been con
| Victed in justice of the peace couT
on some charge of throwing hot waite
; on a COW down on the noted Hesperu
I | lode, and she took appeal AS the COY
| had not been arrested and detained a
a witness. the state was compelled
l | dismiss the case.
, The somewhat noted vagrancy cas-
of a fellow named DeRago had bee
, set for trial in Judge Speers court yes
!. terday, but the court sustained dc
, murrer to the complaint and the d.
PENDANT was discharged. The complain
charged that 'on or about certai
2 date, the defendant lived on the carr
, ings of lewd woman" and the coul
held that one day was not sufficient
g constitute an offense within the NEAR
e ing of the law, and that the complain
should allege the acts to have occurre
between certain dates.
J. The case against Walter Lowe will
called for trial this morning.