The times. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1890-1903, 1896-11-20


From the Circuit Court OF Page. Re-
vorscd. opinion by Judge Keith. President.
Dissenting, Judges Buchanan and Har-
rlson.
This case. affirmed IN 1895. was re-
heard az the last term AZ Stanton. and
reversed.
S.. A. & co. bought lots at Luray.
Their notes secured by trust deed. trans
fcrrcd 10 Gilpln. and suit 10 enforce pay
mont. Cause regularly heard. bin taken
for confessed. decree for sale entered
January. 1891. and lots sold for s2'.25.
having cost about 5000 When report of
sale was made "a paper called n bill OF
review or petition for "a rchcaring was
filed hy S. a. & CO.. setting out false
and fraudulent misrcurce ontations OF
material facts hy the seller OF the lots
which. ST presented properly. an the
proper time. would have been q complete
defence They aycrrcd that "a number
off suits were pending in tho~samo court
involving tho identical questions. and IT
had been agreed among counsel repre-
sonting plaintiffs and defendants that
two particular cases should Doe brought 10
q final hearing. and the decision in them
settle AN other cases of like character
and therefore they made no effort TO
t'' I'hnF TOT Ni"l' ~, p"i .l'r','
cases wcrc continued. They asked for
continuance because OF inc u"uei-
standing That AT or inc 'Af's W.Ic 10
Doe held in allegiance until the agreed ones
had hccn heard. ana because II was
agreed mat the deposiilons taken I'D ino.c
cases were 10 DC I'ao ana use" lh 'H
similar cases my were lor'eo mo
lii'I' ana ihe dccre' oinpi'!h'o OF REM
"'i," "talnst mem. me lo"oI oo .,ll
u,'" ,''"' ''' "u'"'i ", -'''I"s Wv
''''s' VI
'"oH' an" 'h"' inc "'lei.. Vi
''iluaNllJ was Against 'n'in' l'i"9'u
10 leh'ar' dismissed the peuuon' an"
'oil'i i"'u 'ne s''e'
'''" D il 'ne sun .,il'''H - ''''
.''"u Do ""o '"' ~ n''o
''il"s OF li'u'' '"'' ""
"N" '''i u"E il 'o"''. "i" "p-'o' "'''.
lo make ",l nee, am" nave yea
property "H" "t inc IlEH' 'i''' 10 "N"i'
-, ~ jill gi'"" "i ny 'OuH-
'"' ~ '"" '"s uo'9 ITO,
Di el mem 10 I,I',i. "u, .n.( Sloui'
0' ''''' "'7
i'"." sD',lu Ho' in"he
''" ".' n''" "v """ S"""il
ii'h' ''"i ~ Nl-il'i' 10 discover ana
''"'' '' 's,"Nils i'u ia" ana forms OF
PROCEDURE lhe wrong may be redressod.
ne decree OF January lN4, Us not
nildl uecree. inc IialnllH asked en-
'"i''ii'e"' Oh sp', enc zen a court OF
,D' i'''is' 10 "lord sulilelehi ie"ei III
'" '"'''' "0' Only eHloIces lhe men,
Dut gives personal decree Tor the debt.
me source OF jurisdiction is not n right
ITO per sohti decree nut 20 the enforce
ii'nl OF lNe men. decree i7 inal Whlch
or'9 OF au questions presented Ior
7'on' ana gives aI inc rehef 10
WHICH, u.'"'I inc pi'NuiilSa ana inc prool'
,n' ii'l's are 'NlilI'H. rawlings VS..
i'"" .i.l-a' 90 Na.' al D. 90. Ryan adm j..
Vs. '',o % 'i''l' ''' Cooke VS..
.rro rl,',,o,.,. -..., 60, cid. o,.. CT,
ir,- to civ. ,1 t,, ,.ii.e ana go, .t...
tha nra,or for ,,ntll. .lo,,' min, ,i,l
,,laintfr IN "a etardin.. 3, CONT ~
lguif- fine natition rra,iro IN boyo 3,
roho1rd is NOT . bui ~ ro,.io,. l,,t ~
nafition for o. r,b..ri,.
d fs eottl.d tbat o. hun NJ ,o,.io-,.
ues to roboar n docr,, for af,.,..,li.,l.,.
ored o,.id,nco win ~osr.1+ 80 ,,t.i.i
traro e,,,,,s .o ~. 49,, ,,ise....,...-
O. hiu or r.,.i.,,. md. ,,.tt.,a,, TO-
hoariro lfu ~ r,,i,.,,. .,i.o H., 49,
error .,.ra,c,,t B., ca, Too, ~ t,,. -,
but unless tbo nroofs aro s,+ any, 49,, ,,,,
face of the decree IN. .dnitto1 en- t,o
ploadinrs. they cannot he coreidorod ,,,,o.,,
ID bil OF review. Th0mpson "a nroo<e
-f Va. 100. In this resrect "a coifr+ b,s
far greater poyor I'm daal-r, wien f,to.-
Iocutorv DEGREES unop pctition IN re.
hear t,an with on.l ,loo,.,... ,,,.-,, d, t.,r,
of review "''' ''''''' ''''''' 'po" " ID"