The Monmouth inquirer., 1896-01-02

flt. liz t[ltf2 GI AfIC7fEE f59f
! Malta var, ff,SnsfSin fhe rsrsstsasft !
.3ot3s. 4xer wal ,ser,f..rss..d f{, 81
{ X fin4.of &I0 wifho1,t ira 'eoss 4sls.
4 sssssfssfigjaf,f Il md auainet Corr
esFi, = hSp With comm; f.sss
assat,sf ii a'lsd ssttefv sny.s n{SIlA ufase
/ af,5ea
XVfllfa4n Wa sfn q fyan,r, fsland
ssn5Ifx ff, nett l,ree7ev ~ sfpal5ng
ie,f III graf,es ana f,g,fs sn.f,f7rfi1,o Il
ii All "a tie sun, of All 84 sorartin,.
aoo ne sr,rof,e, t:v az T,ouis b. Baeini
fise ff41ft' d ALI IN Main Street. n
1sFeebs,Id H 3 was sentenced to pay
4 fine Of as and costs.
Nr,lie Duran for All assault and
/ hafferv On her sister. Mrs. Annie
I Chan, lserlaif,5 Ger 7f4h last III Red
Hank. and hi s3' had been confined Ia
tssr jail for some time past: ow-
j:sSs fa l,er csseer eondnef. wt,s xefl.
tss3rAd 81 asav are III e anf1
costs.
Bertha Henjn colored. charged
VII X iarceuv 81 stealing two o6l5
/ Ioel. ets. one vnlued X SO and the
other NJ W A4sril If,fh last af Red
hank the rronel.ty of Ella Holmes.
was sefste1lees4 Ia fav q tfpe of 40
ARD eoef.s
Tha appeaf ease Of William
Seafnan vs. Eugene Rowland was
tried before the Court without 3 jury
ara is,1lru,erft reserved. 4. p. Fay
rptYresef,fffi tha af,teIlant and w. A
Il sssiey renrespnted the aDpeljee.
This action was bron0l.tbv HowlaI,d
Il, recover Il Seaman ii the neigh
b6sgsood of SIS for board and feed
fesz 3sorse fbe Justice og the Peace
besSiw gave 4 it1fgyment III favor OF
+, WAND ana Seaman appealed.
Tne panel of Jurors Who tried the
case 81 Reicbers w onfrk were dis
chaFged until dec. 81 as we're alse
the c6nstables
Monday. December s0tb III the
Orps1Ans Court matter or the rule 10
show eas1ss why an administrator
shoffsd rot Be appointed 10 adsnitsis4
ter tspoI the estate of Robert B.
Moore a deceased 4. n Fav. counsel
of j ri Z. Mnlh0lland. made anpli-
cafios, to the Court fl,ef al adfnii1isz
TRAITOR BE apDoinfed aud SUGGESTED
Ciaf erce CT. Nannote Mr. Fay stated
the widow 81 DECEASED had allowed
fbe mace af fiftv DAYS. allowed BIZ
law Yor fhe widow to make sach 2t,-
uIieafi0n. to slabse. and that she had
stAtVa 4 that there Was no estate up0n
" b III ko administer, but that they
claimed there Was about Z 900
worth af personal property. J Haw4
kins pposed the application stating
that S,sertling to law the widow MAS
H. ist person to admiuisi er upon
4gs3 tsia iieis afiau
wa 4 siS ssssi - s,
f,rouerty OF Mr.. Moore was not yalu-
81 at more than S2. so: The Court
stated to Mr.. Fay that if he could
show that the estate left by Mr..
Moore was worth 81 900 that it would
appoint Mrs. Moore as administra-
trix and make her give bonds to the
extent of $4,000. MFR. Fay claimed
that Mrs. Moore was not a proper
person to administer upon her hus-
bands estate but produced no proof
to that effect.
In appeal 94 of THEODORE G.. Mower
ys David j. Hutton, it was announc-
en- by s. Al. Patterson that the ap-
pellant had agreed that the appeal
be dismissed and accordingly Mower
was called and did not appear and
the appeal was dismissed.
Appeai 81, of Edgar L. Rankin,
executor Sc, VS. Jane Hubbell, was
by consent of counsel, put off for
the term.
In appeal of Mary M Doran VS.
Carl Peterson, motion was made