Morning appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1877-1906, 1896-03-06

put on them. The figures On tie bar
are not Of the same size. Some OF the
oars or the Baiie melt we're sent to
San Francisco since the Jones' exam
ination to have the stamping
amined did not find three sets OF
figures in any cd settlement melt.
Witness had never studied up the
aces Of bars. If counterfeit money
was made in a mould with defects in
il. T could Judge something Of the
age of the money if I knew when the
defe IS first appeared in a mould.
Witness declined to pose as an *
pert on manlds. There was consider
able firing between the attorney and
! the witness which occasionally raised
a laugh in the Conrt room. In the
weighing up when Jones was below,
we did not make a critical examina-
ton of the bars. We simply checked
| off the weights, and moved the bars to
search for the missing gold bar, No.
l66. I understand that harris. ON
ners, Ellis and Supt., Adams We're
present at the Sunday weighing. The
missing bar we concluded was stolen.
! Can't say that it might not have been
stolen by men engaged in the weigh
ing. When Jones laid off he went b.
low on pleasure and business. Don't
think Paris Ellis went with him.
Have teen in consultation with the
attorneys in the case, but was only
once at Gen. Clark's residence. and at
that timn did not discuss the Jones
case Have talked with Harris.
Redirect. Jones sometimes ac-
counted receipts to the Superintendent
and sometimes Zahriski. Jones was
was there and also the assistant
Meter & Rpfner IN to his suspension
The opnrati ms practically ceased at
that time. The books show no short
age. but the books and bullion to-
gpther show a shortage. It was nec
easarv to assay the bullion to show a
shortage. Recess.
AFTER RECESS.
The redirect examination of NOto-
| ware was cortinued. He testified that
| he had made most of H. invea't.a-
lions under the direction - the Mint
= authorities. He h. no feeling but
: one Of friandlinnss for Jones. Their
relations had always been pIoasa0t
Jones had received $5.5S a day a
weigh clark As assistant melter an(
: refner 81. 900 when be first went in
2 hut this had been reduced TO $3.50
: since. The receipt for the Bodie pnr
chase was given to Mr.. Peters by Mr.
Manning and subsequently cancelled
e and a new receipt given.
o A small purse was then exhibited t,
the jury and witness said that since
: the noon recess he had put sevHra
small bars in the purse worth 1926
This evidence was to show how tn,
. gold had been taken.
On Tecross witness said he had NJ
9 Tesiro to sec Mr.. Jones found guilt
T Of having taken the gold instead o
q Hirsch Harris. He only wanted t
see the guilty convicted. The ah-trac
= ton of the leaves was from a place il
= the accounts prior to any entries b
Mr.. Harris. On Dec. II, 1894, Their
q was a deposit from the Savage min
d only throe points difference in silve
le. and the same fneness in gold as tn
b bogus melt. Also on Jan. 8, '93 Their
s. was a deposit of bullion by Cha.
Peters that went 1913 in gold.
is WOODBURY. tried to show that tn
n bullion found in PickIer's yard was {
the same fineness as the spuriou
lie melt. The Court ruled it was NJ
al proper cross examination and Woo
n burn said he would introduce the ev
dence later.
6 TESTIMONY OF GEO. LIKENs.
Was employed in the Mint refiner
Is during Z~abriskie's and Harris tern
Zabriskie depended on Jones to do tt
active work. Witness gave the iur
/" a full account of his duties in the Nil
s. and a technical description Of tt
~ map exhibited to the jury. His test
Il mony did not vary from what he gay
- in the Heney trial. Some Of the ju
ors asked the witness questions rel
tive to the refinery and took a gre;
IL interest in the workings Of that d.
partment, which were explained in d
IS tail bv the witness, who had conducte
vi most of the operations of the relner
Il for some years. The same method
," treatment had been employed prior
Mr.. Harris appointment as after.
III tag usually accompanies metal sci