The Ohio Democrat. (Logan, O. [Ohio]) 1886-1906, 1896-07-28
llly fesLored and Mr pryAn

I
We come to speak for thIs broader
class OF business men. All. my friends,
we say not word against those who
1--we upon the Atlantic coast, but those
| hardy pioneers who braved all dangers
Of the wilderness, who have made the
desert to blossom as o rose; those pio-
neers away out there, rearing their
children near to natures heart where
they can mlngle their voices with the
voices Of the birds-out there where
they have ered5sd school houses for the
education or their young and churches
where they praise their Creator and
cemeteries where sleep the ashes OF
their dead-are-as deserving Of tho con-
sdderatlon of this party as any people
In this country. Great applause) We
have petptioned and our petitions have
been scorned We have entreated and
our entreaties have been disregarded,
and they have Knocked when our cllam-
ity came.
we beg no longer: we entreat no
more; we petition no more. We defy
them. Great applause and confusion
In the silver deiegations.)
The gentleman of Wisconsin has said
that he feared Robespierre. My
friends, in this land of the free, We need
fear no tyrant who will spring up from
among the people. What we need Is an
Andrew Jackson to stand as jackson
stood against the encroachments of ag-
grandization of wealth. (Great ap-
plause.) They tell us that this plat
form was made to catch votes. We re-
ply to them that changing conditions
make new issues;that the principles upon
which rest Democracy are as everlasting
as the hills. but that they must be APP
piled to new conditions as they arise.
Conditions have arisen and we are at
tempting to meet those conditions. They
tell us that the income tax ought not
to be brought I'm here, that 1t Is new
idea. They criticlse us for our crIti-
clsms of the Supreme court of the Unit
ed States My friends, we have not
criticised. We have simply called at
tention to what you know. If you want
criticisms read the dissenting opinion
OF the court. That will give you criti-
cisms. (Aplausc) They say we pass
cd an unconstitutional law. I deny H.,
The income tax was not unconstitution-
al when 1t was passed. 1t was not un-
constitutional when II went before the
Supreme court for the first time. II did
not become unconstitutional until one
Judge changed his mind. We cannot
be expected to know when a Judge will
change his mind. Applause and q
voice, "IIit 'em again.'J The income
put the burden of government justly
upon the backs OF the people. am In
favor of an income tax, (Applause)
When find a man who Is not willing
to pay his share for the government
which protects him find a man who IL
unworthy to enjoy the blessings of a
government like ours (Applause) He
Gays that we are opposing the national
bank currency. 1t Is true. If you will
read what Thomas Benton said you will
find that he said In HIS story that he
could find but one parallel to Andrew
Jackson, and that was Cicero, who de-
stroyed the conspiracy of Catallne and
saved Rome.
He did for Rome what Jackson did
when he destroyed the bank conspiracy
and saved America. (Applause) We
say In our platform that we believe that
the right to coin money and Issue money
is function of government. We believe
II. We believe 1t Is a part of sover-
eighty, and can no more be delegated to
private individuals than we could afford
to delegate to private individuals the
power to make penal statutes or levy
laws for taxation. (Applause) Mr..
Jefferson, who was once regarded as
good Democratic authority, seems to
have different opinion from the gen.
tlemcn who have addressed us on the
part of the minority. Those who are op-
posed to the proposition tell us that the
issue of paper money Is function OF
the bank, and that the government
ought to go out OF the banking business
I stand with Jefferson rather than with
thcm. and tell them, as he did. that the
Issue of money Is IA function of the gov
ernment. and that the banks ought to
go out OF the government business.
They complain about the plank which
declares against the life tenure In office
They have to make II mean what It does
not mean. What we oppose In that
plank is the life tenure that Is being
built up at Washington which excludes
from party representation In the bene
fits the humber members OF our society.
cannot dwell longer In my limited time
(Crles OF go on; so on.'9 Let me call
attention to two or three great things,
The gentleman from New York says
that he Will propose an amendment pro-
vldng that this change In our law shall
not affect contracts already made,
Let me remind him that there Is no In,
tention OF affecting these contracts,
which according TO the present laws,
are made payable In gold. But II he
means to say that we cannot change
our monetary system without protect
ing those who have loaned money he
'NAN eA'N Ntis'hbS hdS M4hl w Uhh
him where, m law or In
morals, he can find authority
for not protecting the debtors
when the ect of 1873 was passed, but
now Insists that we must protect the |
creditor. He says he also wants to |
amend this law and provide that II we
fall to mainta n parity within year
we will then suspend the coinage |
Of silver We reply that when we ad. |
vocate thing which we believe win |
be successful we are not compelled to |
raise a. doubt as to our own sincerity |
by trSing to show what we will do Z |
we can. ask him II he viii apply his |
logic to US, why he does not apply II Ia |
himself He says that he wants this
country to try to secure an interna-
tlonal agreement. Why doesn't he tell |
us what he Is going to do e they fail |
to secure an International agreement |
There Is more reason far him 10 do that |
than for us to fall to maintain the
parity. They have tried for 80 years
TO secure an International agreement,
and they are still wa ting for II most
impatientiy and don't want Il at all
toheeos and iaughter.)
Now. my friends, let me come to the
great paramount Issue. If they ask us
why II is that we say more upon the
money question than we say upon the
tariff question, / reply that If protection
Has slain Ita thousands the gold standard
has slain Its tens of thousands. If they
ask US why we did not embody all these
things IN our platform in which we be-
Hove we reply to them that when we
have restored the money OF tho aopatltu-
lion all other necessary reforms will be
possible and until that Is done there Is
no reforrn thai can be accomplished
Ichesrs) Why, ! say that In three