The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1896-03-21


aristocrat posing as a Democrat. His in
stincts We're feudal in nature.
Proceeding, Mr. Willis drew the MEM
bers around him in throngs and aroused
great enthusiasm both on the floor and in
the galleries by his eulogy of the value
of the birthright of liberty and his out
spoken coptAmpt for American snobs, sy-
cophants and simpletons, who discredlted
their own country and worShipped at the
loot of the ariStocracy and
ROYALTY OF THE OLD WORLD.
Mr.. Turner Dem, Ga) closed the de-
bate for the opposition to the resolutions
IN strong ten-minute speech. His theme,
would, he said, be individual freedom;
the germ of national prosperity and pro-
gress, theme worthy of that noble che
Waller.
With contempt he described the trium-
phant Republican party turning away
from its duty to visit its wrath and In
dignation upon a member of his party for
trivial act. What a prodigy; what an
exploit in politicsl The question was not
whether Mr.. Bayard had violated good
taste in his address. but whether it was
in good taste for the house of representa-
ives TO condemn him for what he had
oone Like Mr.. Tucker, yesterday, he
paid an eloquent tribute to Mr. Bayard
for his services to the south in the days
OF her despair, and he then proceeded to
recall again the Chandler interview and
IN me charges of levying on the protected
industries by the Mckinley agents.
Mr.. Grosvenor Rep) Ohio, tried vainly
to interrupt Mr.. Turner
A MERITED SLAP.
You have had your time, said Mr..
turner, when you stood over the grave
of General Schenck Yesterday defending
him from the inputations against him,
you said not one word against those stor-
les about the agents of the presidential
candidate You favor
In the face of such a. state of things.
MT. speaker, he continued, Il ask If it
is not strange coincidence that the de-
monstration should follow the statement
as the thunder follows the lightning"
applause on the Democratic side.)
ruption he said. the addition" was go
ing on, the division and silence" would
come later. democratic laughter.)
After few words by Mr.. Newlands
Nev), in favor of the resolutions, Mr..
Hit, chairman of the foreign aairs COM
m1ttee yielded the remainder of his time
to Mr.. Bailey Oem. Texas, who made
speech in favor of the resolutions. The
Edinburgh speech might, he said, be a
breach of propriety. but it did not war
rant these resolutions of cenSure. The
Boston speech characteriZing the people
of the United States as a violent people
was much more serious. 1t was
BREACH OF GOOD TASTE
and of diplomatic etiquette, and was an
offense against our common sense and
sound and rugged patriotism. (RepUbli
can applause.) a hundred years of quiet
submission to the laws repealed the
charge that the Americans were a vio-
lent people, Mr.. Bailey concluded by say
ing that a man who would express such
utterances as those of Mr.. Bayard at
Boston, was unworthy to represent this
country anywhere or at any time.
loud and long Republican applause)
At the conclusion of Mr.. Bailey's re-
marks. Mr.. Hit asked for a vote. At the
request of Mr.. Willis, the vote was taken
separately on the two resolutions The
first resolution censured Mr.. Bayard in
the name of the American people, the
second condemned in general terms the
delivery of partisan speeches by our for
eign representatives.
The first resolution was adopted, 1S0-n-
The corrected vote shows that six Demo
Gratis. Bailey and Cockrell of Texas;
Cummings of New York: Latimer of
South Carolina; Layton and Sorg OF
Ohio, voted with the Republicans for the
resolution and five Republicans, Baker
of Maryland; Cook of Illinois; Draper of
Massachusetts,; Pitney5 of New jersey,
and Willis of Delaware, with the Demo
Gratis against it. The second resolution
was adopted-191-59.
Nine Democrats voted for this resolu-
nine Democrats were: Allen, Miss: Bal
ley, Texas: Cummings, N. Y; Hutchin-
son. Texas: Layton, Ohio: Owens, KY;
Pendeleton, Texas; Sorg, Ohio; and
Stokes, n. G.