Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1896-08-13

Che c.att 10 $3.50.
AMI or n tu1gnd tpul,hgttl0n Sid.
Ury savens. Informant. ssys, ths. ..
ihr Ina hereinafter mnniilnol fht
tlI4 J. udaay II. Rogers was no ai,.r
uty tHf coutnslOr.lt-law as aiofps .U.
IHIt IN OF nuuut May STU 1891, 'u.
iafmaH was the owner OF a rflmiaH1lY
note tfihu face value OF 100000, faiI
uU.ut .Ipr the note " onr EfuHsl a.
g.l.g M ondOfscd by VIII ~. 6wHu,
Goo J.gInai unytc. That sati ruiu
Up. rl.i fcd w second m0risagH 600
g.fr. cal property located in Uni.
yJrH Place Addition, ogden city,aH4
,url.f ecufcd by the Hc; tuHi t.u
3, Hafi. mentioned Ia faiI m1flg1gu
hHu balm conveyed 40 uuu a, G.. Fls..
who DO such Conveyance had ugftt8
81 as lid mote.
400. id nlts and m9rtlago provII.
cd ltuIofney = fsvs in caro- Of cult iJf
cJIrCln.
Ina. "A or about the date las. mur.
ti1u.. inetay Il. Rogers came 90 iu.
i'iMll Sldnvy stevens, hlu rcpf.
a...H Informant that the hfm Of
EvaW s. i,rsufs, o. which he was O.
rI..gN hal o. nitITuUyH ilf iUt..
ClU.uf.. q crftniu mortgage owned ny
0ue ] ,ph ClAth, which last mUu.
t1u. uifigagu affected tho property
which HlI betu m1figagcd TO tugutg
thu tJlH 1tiufOfmini.
Iuat said Rogers further represented
90 Sidney Stevens, Informant, that be
would BE- made u party defendant 10
tue sg,Iln brought b. Jus. CLARK, ami
that Informant should antwrr
by q cross complaint, tviliug
up there. y informaups taii note ana
mUugas. that said l.. IL. Rogers then
ftq4ts,tI informant 10 ALLOW him,
Rjsufi. u take iniofmuupa said note
anu mortgage ana that he a. attorney
would ft. recent said informant "a said
mhltUt
Said Rogers further representing that
he wgull make no CtnUr or further
charges Than tho attofney's fees pfg.
vldtl ilt IN said iniOfmAups sail note
anu uOHgage.
Thht informant thoroupln, hul To-
compliance with tue saii klguft's o..
qutsl huu proposal, delivered 10 snlI
itJg.m a1 attorney said note and mott.
gegr.
iua' O. erwafjs said Rogors hlcd, boz
Glars, a1 answer anu cfUsf.c0mplaiut
Gr informant upon said n1tn aul muf,.
gage. the arm u Evans d RlRtfs nav.
ING . g uErt the action iOr said CLARK
Ne iaIuui, that Afterwards such lr1.
ctBuiHgs we're had that u decree was
rendered Ia saii auit Ia favor Of o..
iOtmaui, aad ,hcto was allowed upon
tau uIiU amt mortgage Of iuiofmau,
tue sum u' $4,000 a. attorneys tee;
thut all tho,o pr ctedlHgs were had iu
mo TERRITORIAL district oJut. at Ogdeu,
U,uh.
Ina, a.t,rWarfr, In pursuance u q
mauhais aalu unuor decree outeful 30
saiI pfOCusdiugr, there was realized
rom thr rglo OF properly Included 90
iuflfmaupAsaid mortgage toe tuu u
$4,000 at'ufneya fees AMI Sl81.2u a..
uiuoual. hiob Saa 10 nppIy GA mi Iin.
nlt't decree aud iulgmuni.
Thnt on pr Rnout Ia ntsi day on
February, 1899. rnil tm unis, vEi
sigj 90 IN siSD.e0, were paid ~ tht
uuitui riAtrs mzfahal 10 tic said
lhudsay ~. Roger; that on or about
she lilu Jay II July, 1893, theru was
paid toto ne clefk's CiiiUU VI said ilf'
lfcl cgufi, 10 apply on plsinul'a
decree ami judgment, had under tnil
'1urcl.furl ptorrc iiugs tho tuflhri
tum Of s-sIg5, when said Lindsay h.
Rogers 6, eriptud ios AMI received if0m
fuid CItts, Masking total which he,
tue said II gers, had received uu said
decree uul Judgment OF si-l,ll oyoi
aud ab3ye tho $4,000 m attorneys
iooF,
That tho said Lindsay Il. B1gcu
has not a. 10 this time ever reported
10 said iuiutmaut Of the receipt ui said
m3ury bs telonging TO said Informant
OF accounted for tho ssmein any man,
nrr. Informant further states that ne
! dii not learn q or have any knowledge
Di the phyment OF saiu sum by
said mafsnh or said clerk 10 the
AlI Liudsay II. Rogers, nor that tue
same mai bven received by the cali
marshal on clerk until on OF about The
met Jay % June, 1885.
Thst ihricupnn anu uron recent a
such information he cauisl 10 be- wTlt,
ten letter demanding report and
tUttlTmuui rom tho said Lindsay H.
Rogers respecting SAID matters aud
caused said io1lSr to TO delivered rs
carrier NJ lin Office lUf Lindsay A.
Rogers nt ogden, Utah, anu tue said
letter was f,ceived by the taii Lindsay
II, RIgvu, but said Rogers mas Il,
used nu1 slill refuses 10 account Il
informant 10 any manner.
AMI this Informant Il Informed aud
states that said l.. Il. Rirvrs claim,
that ho IL believed OF legal liability /.
Gcoluug f9f said money uy yltluu Ct
tho statute d limitations.
wnetuiutg, the premises considered,
/, sidney stevens, pray tnis honorabl,
court 10 cite the said Lindsay n,
RlgpTs 90 make answer hereto and
that uuIn ptoper hearing Of the mat
/ tOTs herein contained this houOflhI,
court tlk9 tlch action and make suru
order AZ tbaIl to Justice belong.
SiDNEY sTEyESa
state OF Uali County u Weber, DO.
Si.ugy S,svens, informant, slatgi
that Boo hnf read the foregoing ini0f.
nation, aud knows the c1nlent.; thai
the matters therein stated Hra Jtus al
bis own ku1wledge, except % 90 mat
/ tors stated N Information ana As {.
them be ugl5ves them 10 10 irur.
tIDSIY S4Gvgss.
subTcr.'oi and iwJgn 10 before N,
tuls Ion 10y OF Angus, a. u. 1896.
.srhlI Il. II. lEA1E.
Notary ruylll