The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1896-09-18

not 10 preserve uemocrAuc principles, pli
to favor new principle. that this part
was inaugurated. a stii worse mofiv
appears to have led to the adoption of tn
banking plank. The Journal of Commerc
says:
The action of the Massachusetts dclegn
| uon, IN inStructing their member OF tn
committee on resolutions to propose
| banking plank, undoubtedly had influence
on the result. MIR Perry Ssamont was
| strong supporter of a banking currency
| and did not hesitate to throw his .nnu
| ence, in the press and among his associ
altos from New York and other States, II
| favor of such n declaration He contem,
| plated AZ one time asking the New Yorl
| delegation TO take the same action as that
taken BY the delegation from Massachu-
| when II became apparent what vas the
| temper OF the southern delegates. They
| were almost unanimously In favor OF A
| strong declaration for banking currency
| because thy believed that 1t would cn.
| able them to take back to thor people
| NC promise of reform IN existing ooudl.
| ions as a counterwelght 10 the Bryan
| remedy of free silver coinage.
| In other words. the currency plank is d
| dodge TO catch votes in the South from
men who know that the evils from which
the country Is suffering are due to our
money system, and who demand reform ir
that Inc. These very goldbugs who pre-
~''- ''-''* 49, h''itoipnthi't'iN 10 a bSSi
able thing make this EFFORT TO delldc the
voters Of the rounttv who mr.. .ufrsri,y
from the effects of gold monometallisln.
We presume this is the democracy of JET
terson ana Jackson also.
Mr.. Bryan told the truth In kentucky
when he declared that the Chicago plat
10 :" WHS NV ~ uein"cl "'ir P'ai i
Ia,rn, ,,'or No.. u'ioE "a
-. 49,, ICES iott' lut t
SJihrS, were u,aue SIMPLY WIN we" OF
H't"ttnh tynNv.. lIuHl 'ep"nHlthiSi" IN
Wy 1871 1911 Sui,es anu MI Hiaut as
t t,.H repu"''0h'i us Observation-Disclosures
t9at
49,, cv''ls' IN" olu iehocrallc plat orins
er9',a,Io, ~ tloiS suplottoi .Wyt,es
w. ~ ", 'i'oNi,lvlls Oh Itpuphctlt s.llts
AT nvsl "n. NJ foa5 swoIe ihey were e.
i '.S ui rue aotnoera1ic prile!Sles
anu canned an VINO opposeI them. the
& WI. Ie 'kumpity lump. Gal
~ N'"s
II the faith Of The Post has at any lime
baen a lie the faith of tho denocr,tL,
W N.'o u''''V1' ",'-
party oil the unNeh states has been lie
for The Pea, has loyalty and ons.stently
racv. ono, hinc f., card, ,.,,...I.ho pas, h..
.revor uvad Ia M. ,be Nn,,s ,,,t''n
,,,.,,f,s.t,,., 80 H., -, -
l.'...,,...9, '''.' no
vs. mn ''t'' '''' ue'''ON'"'!
III N'eiy elecuon ana al every otheE op-
lQrtuu.ty.
To he Editor of The Post
prtera. TeSas. september i2.--Can The
Post explain thls 10 I'M reor,le as we don't
undo rstal.d /. now. Say II BRIAN and
SeN,Il get ~ votes and Bryan and Wat
-ou s, aCo vote. am Mckinley AID Io-
bart pt no. votes who ,vouil ia sic.f.,I,
luis Is IN important QUESTION before he
people. as sotne thnk and Il pr.ut many
drink the total vote Tor Bryan ana sew iii
and HryAn ard Watson will be c1i,uted for
Bryan: that is 10 saw. The elc,tory yott,
for bryan and Sswall ana Bryan ana Wat
son viii be voted together. Hoping TO hear
your opinion On this. am. yours truly.
H. 5 Brown.
m, pos, t.., ,.,,...,..,,, ~. .,,,,.,,t..,
N''' ""' "i9 "'''" 'iN'9 question:
but takes occasion here 10 print The fol
lowing communication on the subject just
,..i,,..., ,.,,, III. ~ t,.,,,,.
am IN receipt of Inquiries as to
gnr Inc ur,a g'7s ~. sn '"r Peoie No'e
a. ol,ars vote Tor the BRYAN and Vat
ION eloc oral p.cket. those Who vote Tor
ip4n ticket. will b,. gnuu.l.l fan. Ttrta,