Great Falls weekly tribune. [volume] (Great Falls, Mont.) 1894-1???, 1896-09-04
CIVIL CALENDAR

For the september Term of the Eighth
District Court.
The September term OF the district
court will convene next Monday morn
ing at 10 o'clock and, on account OF La-
Dor day, will Immediately adjourn until
Tuesday morning, when the jurors will
be present
The following actions are on the civil
calendar for trial:
No. 0l4-Alice F. Yore VS.. John r.
Murphy; damages for conversion.
No. l.OO7-First National Bank OF
No. LOT - Northwestern National
Bank of Great Falls We. Great Falls
Opera House Co. ct al; note.
No. Merchants National Bank
OF Great Falls vs.. Great Falls Opera
House Co. ct al; note.
No. L. 1,14O-Merchants National Bank
Of Great Falls vs. Lecia Reilly ct al;
foreclosure.
No. 1,190-Nellie Perkins We. William
Clm ct al; injunction.
No. ,213-M erchants' Nation al Bank
OF Great Falls vs. G. L. Stevenson ct al;
note, $500
No. l,35GGreat Falls Improvement
Co, vs. Joe Conrad ct al; ejcctment.
No. l,5O2--Ameia Sundermeier VS.. A.
Sires; to dissolve copartnership
No 1,J5l-Butte and Montana Com
mercial Go. vs. Si!as White ct al; note.
5CGl5G.
No. 1,G11-James Baatz ys. Andrew
'oy heT 9t 70. a. accouns' =,
~ No, l'o2'CdrSa' ~ va aus Improvement
~ 20; a,o Vs. w. " W. fuHerton; account,
'-.-oo' -,o p.. $780,, ~,-
IVY, No' = i-IbosIon ana breet rails
LnII.ilc itnn.n n hsrtt & anu io"er 20 vs. Treat
L eila OPera i1ouse Gpi account
M Noi f'1-'ohh lleahey vs. ilostord
i 'He ~ nl!cA nz NQ appeal'
,rt ~. l,' ,,t1N,,"t. - rreuerlcks et al V5.
Aiohia7 oao nC "Iuo,,' ~ 'ulunc'oh'
rant.a ~. l'p'oCl' %, ~, M' lyler vs. Montana
oeut'al Ey; n3a N9,' contract, 3'[i'
L, ~ l'2'o o. pa'e'llan n"!t2ef Ve'
Hosone a., - 'o"IItoh, acGouh'' = ~ -
W. I,'' i-oonA " loiau ,tn Vs. w d. heck'
'ei NJ .. o., {, c.,I 1aithses' lr't' '1-o;lVV' r.,
,,.CI.1o S" 1''o-'-r-l""fl D; C@hury Vs. d. T.
.ncCic1ah'' li7"A eI ai'' 70 Het asiae
Lax 7a.eI -,
r, 10, 49, -.'o'.' "i' ,7c''r3 Z" 90 vs. J.
T. Dyas 9. el.l A. account
e,.. no. Zoo'-\ h4oacu " tocHfIA vs.
'o'lalh i 5rU1 ,'rUS'' ,ti,"'a';I I.:.
, 10 ~ =, -, w. -" Li' ''eati''p ~ ND' vs.
o"(le9 l, ", ,,,.' ,'"qLt' account ." ''''@3;
=. 10. 80 -I"to ..2"t ,2tH'o h"hA vs. MAUI
'iT1latusUn' EI y 6'h 1oto' '1Uo Go,t1 49,
~ ~. -Jo,, ,,.;1 GtGa. L ntls iiu..tIo'em"ht u.t
20 w. .,i,. - ~ i,IlusoSi hCto, f''g'
~ 'G"' " hohe"na "a NH'iohf. r,1 10, banF VS.
l. ~ f'' o1i1!.iS' ,51 mQ'e' f|,o'1Io'''
40, :, I,l-'--i n''p V. harrington Vs.
am IN 'lartihgI9A' u ,tn IiVHrce, n
r., 80 40 y l-1-f W. NC -lui'cy V9 j ~
"rSes Te . 81 tim a.; "a a!cpuhtI 21 ,, s'-D'
H. ~; ,,iooIW' II. ilan1"on" i'nn w. jos
i'Hnl'',oh; am 10, o%n'ages' "A s'IV,
No: NO: -'ln- .r y, neo. zoo f1elot vs. H. NJ
'aIhln,. ho'eI, I1'Jyo' r, =,
40. -,-1,- D. %. Nelly vs. 1. H. nmui-
'elS ~ el a. c,l 70 Vo'o I' certaih oeeua'
NJ, ~ -'eo'se W. hIo"n vs. 'ohh
a. i'oi,inan !, a,tn ct a', appeal
NO r I,-Dn-1reat ans Natlomai ia hank
W. A. ~; 1oi, -,loIanan et al ho'e, EIuoo
~ .''l ,a'e,i'"h t,T ''Mi,Hor vs.
ia'n1a,eer M a1n ~ C!arh' account 2oz."'
& ~, Is.,i I,oi,-'oln N'ait.h t,na w. H'tE OF
"rea' W :, fa,5s' 5n1 Srcouh,' ,r s--11'' -,
1,nI1o ~ -''I-' r-n -'"ry neic' w. ''e 'rea'
rnll' y, ~ GauaN' cnn ''1''"ny co'llFa'ly' "hii!'
"Rss w ?,31Vo' ,, 33.. ,.. ,;. A.. 49,.
,,,' No. -''5-oa al'ss 'erce Vs. 'he Ireaf
a'le ~ Nanaua '|ah"ay company; danl'
aees' ~ I''o'
Wy 20 :, I,o Ir CIIr'sl,ra stephenson We.
W, W. ~ 5ot: n"ye', 'onei'',; Ian'aRes' ,a
, no, .tiafry v, Wheeler vs. +. T.
~ tNins"h St-e 81 a. appe"',
W, ", -,,'I, :, '.er'tuue t. oo!ehan o' H.
VS.: w w. ,5-i ~: D"yer, 2rur'I'' Hlnea,,,