The Stark County Democrat. [volume] (Canton, Ohio) 1833-1912, 1896-04-09
In THE COURTS.
Matters of Interest That Are Occupy
ing the Time Of the Court
House Officials.

| Inc Case OF Logan, breRR " Co., VS..
George King and G. NJ. Nichols g. Co.,
Vs. George J. King ct al, were con
tinued until next term Of court to await
the decision in another case bearing
upon questions involved.
The case OF John X Koehler VS.. Thomas
Leahy, ct al, was disposed of at present
by the court ordering the sheriff TO sell
chattel property, bring the money into
court and await further orders.
The divorce case Of Robert Merri-
man vs. M. Katie Merriman was con-
tinued until further testimony was
secured.
John j. Maudru has commenced ac-
tion against the Alliance Street
Railway company and Henry G. Eli
sons trustee, for recovery of real estate
sold under tax title to the state or for
Judgment amounting to 1853, 7sS MIL
Ter & Pomerene are attorneys for plain
tiff
william Wagner, as receiver for the
Globe Clothing Company, has filed his
report in common pleas court. He asks
to be allowed $40 for expenses incurred,
to be discharged and have his bond re-
leased.
The Home Savings & Loan company
has sued Emily wirebaugh ct al, to
secure judgment of 81 ,61467 secured by
mortgage.
Samuel H. Benson, who is wanted in
Lebanon county Pa, was taken before
Judge McCarty who honored the re-
QUESTION papers and ordered him deliv-
cred to the proper authorities.
Jacob Fohl has sued Thomas MoCor-
mick, Emma Mccormick ct al. to recover
81 ,02S. 33 claimed on note and secured
/ by mortgage. william Hanson has filed
cross petition in this case asking that
= claim held by him against Thomas
' Mccormick for 81, ,1O4 on promissory
r ncte be satisfied. John c. Mong IL
plaintiffs attorney in the case
Owing to Judge Taylor being occu
pied with the case of Welsh vs.. Doyle
$ from Alliance Judge McCarty is attend
> ing to the assignments that Judge Taylor
was to have heard.
The case of b. +. Shull VS.. Jane.
Brescoe ct al, was disposed of this morn
, ing. This was the. one in which thu
: plaintiff set up the clairn that by pu
up scheme hesswas induced to bet 500 OF
:, a foot race in Massillon last Septem Der
!. and was beaten out of it through unfair
@ means. He sued to recover his 500
Z and the court decided in his favor ant
: added penalty of $50, all of which to
f Rether with costs, the defendant mus
/. pay. Sterling & Werntz represented thu
/ plaintiff.
n Divorces were granted in each of thu
e cases of Eta Gavin VS. John Gavin, Eliza
0 beth Roberts VS.. Alfred Roberts ant
r Mary A. Dehoff VS.. George o. Dehoff.
S In the case OF John Koehler VS.. Thomas
e Leahy ct al, in which court had ordered
4 chattels to be sold and the sheriff u
await further orders, 1t was further or
dered this morning that funds be dis
| bElbubCu alOCI SsilO Ou - DEll H.
In, court room No. 3, Wednesday after
; noon, the divorce case of Robert Merri
$ man vs. Katie NJ. Merriman, was taker
!, up again, after a short continuance t.
= secure more competent testimony. A
decree was finally granted the plaintiff
I by Judge Taylor.
Elizabeth Bowman, executrix of thu
estate of George Bowman, has com,
menced action against the African NJ. f
Zion churh Of Massillon, to get a judg
ment of S229. AZ on q promissory note Sc
cured by mortgage Wilson g. Day arr
plaintiffs attorneys.
Samuel Schupbach has sued Anna
Burkhart and Joseph Burkhart to secure
Judgment of s125 on a note. Nat @. & j
S. Mclean are plaintiffs attorneys.
q The case of william Monroe VS.. jeff
D Miller, appealed from Squire Webb'I
q court, has been heard by Judge Taylor
$ and jury today. 1t was a suit for ssl
t alleged to be due for work. The jury IL
T out at our press time, and the divorce
case Of Lindeman vs. Lindeman is being
i heard this afternoon. In the Tormel
= case, Smith g. Yohe are plaintiffs attor
i neys, and Nat C McLain defendants at
: torney, while In the divorce case W. j
Piero is plaintiffs attorney.
: Before Judge McCarty, the case o
Aultman & Wilson VS.. A. b. Hoffman &
Co., has been up all day. 1t is dispute
!. over business affairs transacted befor,
: and after dissolution of partnership.
The case OF Margaret Welsh VS.. James
!, Doyle, an Alliance case, which was I
. controversy over property, occupied th
entire day in Judge Taylor's cour
a Thursday. II was decided in favor of tn
. plaintiff.
Judge McCarty granted the divorc
: asked for in the case Of Augusta Maure
I VS.. Charles Maurer, Of Massillon. Rob
/. ert Folger was plaintiffs attorney.
In common pleas court Friday, Judg
Q Talyor heard the case of Monroe VS.
a Miller, and at the time of adiournmen
+ the judge announced that he would TAX
the case under advisement.
Judge McCarty, in the case Of Ault
man Il Wilson VS.. A. b. Hoffman & Co.
8 continued the case until next week 70
argument.
Judge MoCarty granted the divorce o