San Antonio daily light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1886-1907, 1896-01-07
NEWS OF aHE COURTS.

4
E. w. Wright VS.. Emma Wright
divorce; dismissed at plaintiffs
cost.
l.. Frank & Co. VS.. G.. III. Nc
Closkey, promissory note and at
tachment; Judgment by default.
Francis Denmer VS.. John DEM
mer, ST., appeal from justice court ;
dismissed per agreement.
Ronse & Wahlstab VS.. Albert
Persch, debt; judgment by default.
Jack Kent We. Joe. Clements,
debt and attachment; judgm emit
by default.
Hilman Schutzler vs. Herman
Robitzscb, appeal from justice
court; dismissed at defendants
Cvst.
j. III. Prendergast vs.. John III.
Hager, promissory note judgment
by default.
Cyrus Il. Green vs. w. b. Sham !;
dismissed for want of prosecution.
Fannie Warshauer vs. Sam
observation-disclosures and Injunction !;
dismissed for want of prosecution.
Mary Ann Dart vs. William Wal
lace, forcible detainer, appeal from
justice court; dismissed for want
OF prosecution.
San Dalkowitz VS.. John p. Camp
bell, injunction; dismissed for
want of prosecution.
Frank r. Desmond VS.. Mollie
Desmond; divorce; dismissed I'M
der rule for costs.
Charles F. Johnson VS.. w. G.
Buchanan, on account for services;
judgment for plaintiff.
Andrea M. Garcia VS.. r. w.
Robertson ct al, damages; judy
ment for defendants except Rober-
son.
Wagner & Chabot VS.. Hermann
Erkes, sequestration; judgment
for plaintiff and foreclosure of lien.
George Koerner va. Bowman &
Titus, on sworn account dismissal
set aside.
Herman WALTZ ct al. vs. Adolph
Schmitt ct al, promissory note
and foreclosure of lien; judgment
for plaintiff with foreclosure of
lien.
Wn. and Matte Long VS.. E. L.
Golfer ct ais, distress warrant; de-
fendant's motion to quaSh distress
warrant granted.
Lizzie E. Smelling VS.. j. Il. SHELL
ing, divorce; dismissal set aside.
Chabot & Cresson VS.. Samuel w.
Jones, promissory note; dismissal
set aside.
Hooper Mayer Co. vs.. A. G. Hill,
debt and attachment; judgment,
for plaintiff with foreclosure of at
tachment lien.
FoRTY.FIFTH DISTRICT COURT.
Peter Juraschek VS.. j. p.
promissory notes and
foreclosure OF lien; verdict for
plaintiff.
Erich Menger VS.. G.. r. Hass ct
al, TO try title and for damages;
dismissed at defendants costs.
Sam c. Bell VS.. s. A. and A. P.
Ry. Co., damages; judgment for
plaintiff.
Leopold M. Michael vs. City of
San Antonio, garnishee, appeal
from justice court; judgment for
plaintiff.
w. G. Coopwood VS.. Otto Zlrkel,
debt; dismissed by plaintiff.
N. Mackey VS.. City of San An
tonic, damages on trial by jury.
COMMISSIONERS COURT.
The county commissioners or
dered this morning that the court
house contractor pay $25 a day "a
forfeit IL the courthouse is not com.
pleted after seven months from
date OF signing contract.
The assessment of Simon Fest,
Sr., was reduced $1,000.
A petition OF the Western Union
Telegraph company to reduce
taxes for 1895 was refused.
A petition of Assessor Huth for
eight new chairs in his office was
granted.
A number OF reports and &C
counts were approved.
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS.
Motions granted--The Mer-
chants Insurance Co. VS.. Millard
Storey ct. al, from Dallas, for leave
to file appellee's briefs; Frank
Haunn, receiver, We. j. Stone &
Sons Live Stock Co. ct al, from
Dallas, to postpone submission to
February %; g., c. & S. F Ry. Co.
vs.. Samuel West. by next friend,
from johnson, to postpone submits
sion to January %; g., c. q s. F.