Richmond dispatch. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1884-1903, 1896-03-14

each case with felony. the punishment
far which is confinement in the penl-
t.ntiary. ,.
Tbe first Indictment was for obtain
tr.. notes and money from John Il. Rose
a. fraudulent INTERPRETATIONS, ana the
other two. returned a little Iater'
charge him with having feloniousy
taken. stolen. and carried away Ger
cain negotiable notes the property OF
"a n Gibbs and Annie r. Philips. The
hose Indictment also charges larceny III
addition TO intent TO detraud.
There will probably be other indict-
rn.rts Inter. hut none until Bartons
whereabouts are ascertained.
THE ROSE CASE.
Tho ,riictment in the Rose case reads
ss follows:
-,u the County Court Of said county,
Oh. Jurors of the Commonwealth Of
l.-e.nia. in and for the body Of the
county Of Henrico, duly summoned to
srI now attending the said court upon
fb.lr oaths. present that James II. Bar
ION. on the 18th day of October. in the
wear 1852. al the said county and with
in the jurisdiction of the said County
Court of Henrico county. did feloni-
1usly and falsely pretend and represent
to one John +. Rose that a certain
niece Of property-tO wit, lot 6, In block
"a Of the plan Of Barton Heights. situ-
ated ia HenricO cuunty-was free from
an encumbrances, and did. By means
of the said false pretence feloniously
obtain from the said John T.. Rose nine
fr-nve notes. each Of said notes being
drawn by the said John L. Rose, and
ravable TO the order Of said James IL.
Barton. negotiable and payable at the
ID s.F NN.NnF
..Nnety-four Of said notes. each for
the sum Of s}5. and the ninety-fifth note
f1r the sum Of $40. the said notes being
rayable on the 18TH day of each and
every month for nnety-fivc successive
months. beginning on the 18th day of
November. 1SB. each Of said notes be
irr a paper Of value, and all Of said
notes being OF the aggregate value OF
ytea the said notes being the goods,
chauels. and property Of the said John
T. Rose. with intent TO defraud the
sal John +. Rose. against the peace
ana dignity of the Commonwealth of
VIRGINIA.
PRIOR DEED OF TRUST.
and the grand jurors aforesaid do fur
.h.r present that the said James II. Bar
.0n ou the 18th day OF October. In the
.,.r lSo at the sa.d county, and within
U- jurisdiction OF this court did falsely
aaI f0.on.1usly pretend and declare TO
,re John +. Rose that certain lot then
and There situated I'm HenricO county.
Na. and known and designated as lot
Ono tloca -i 900 the plan Of Barton Heights,
Bon said county. was free from all incum-
lrlnCes whom i'm truth and In fact the
said james h Barton. then end there
Suew and Was informed that there was
ben ana there valid and Subslsting lien
upon the property Aforesaid. by reason OF
certain decd OF trust. dated the 4th
lay of October 1852. which said deed was
Executed On the ith day Of october by
'amcs n Barton and Elizabeth c. Bar
HU. his wife. 90 John Il. Purcell. John ).
..ett AND Frank l.. Sutton. as trustees
r tle ola Dominion Building and Loan
ASSOCIATION by which said lot was con-
.tveI t0 said trustees as aforesaid 10 Sc
'Urr said association the payment OF
which said sum at the said time
h representations. pretenslOns, and de-
.4rat.uu was owing and unpaid, whereby
ui by reason Of which said felOnious
tni false declarations, pretences and
ffrcsentations. SO far as aforesaid made
p he said James n. Barton TO said John
p Rose. af the county aforesaid, on the
n1 18th day Of October. 1892, the said
ioaa q. Rose was induced to purchase
fom him. the said James ii. Barton, the
a4 il' aforesaid and TO pay therefor
i' SUM OFF s. l01, q part OF which the said
I1.n D.. Rose then and there paid TO the
u.l james n. Barton. 10y means OF which
ia1 false preterccs then and there made,
l.i ana employed by the said James II.
Barton. Boz then and there obtained and
t..F.i from said John y. Rose ninety
N. .1uable notes. ninety-four Of said
'.. each for the sum Of S35. and the
lnep-iNh note for $40, and all Of the
' notes being OF the aggregate value
$500 iae said notes being Of value and
it. -ois chattels. and property OF the
4.i lor. h. Rose with intent the said
I..n E Rose then and there 10 defraud
l'd.t ite peace and dignity Of the Com
n'rHUa'tn
hai Toe Jurors aforesaid now
Intending said County Court Of Henrico
p upon their Oaths present that
'i's IT, Barton. on the 18th day OF Oc-
t..t lA-. IN the county Of Henrico. in
'' State oi Virginia, ninety-Ave notes.
' .u4r or said notes being for the
'tm Of &5 and the ninety-hfth Of said
'.'a being Tor the sum OF $40. and all OF
aAffesate value Of $500 OF the goods. |
'.''.i. and property OF the said John (
g. Rose. then and there being found. fe-
'.'9asiy did take steal. and carry away
ifl'st the peace and dignity OF the Com |
Aouwealth OF Virginia"
CASE OF AIRS. PHILLIPS.
The Indictment IN the case OF Mrs.
Phillips Is IN these words:
Tho jurors OF the Commonwealth Of l
virginia, IN and for the body OF the |
county Of Henrico. duly summoned 20. |
ana now attending the said court, upon /
ttr oaihs present that James II. Bar |
goa. on the 18th day OF November. in |
me year 1892. at the said county and |
within the jurisdiction OF said County /
'oert of Henrico county, In the State |
l virginia, ia n0tes-ii2 notes for the |
tum of 81 each. and the Nth note for |
4of sum Of s2s-and all OF the aggregate |
ssiae 81 '2Aji. Of the goods and chatiels
aha property Of Annie 4. Philips. then |