New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1896-03-26
LOCiL BUSINESS COUPLIF1TIONS.

SCHEDULES or DAN TALMAGEs scNS-SoME
HEAVY Jj'IGMrNTs.
The schedules Of Dan Tanage's Sons rice mer
chants at No ilj Wal-st.. who had branches Tn
Charleston and New Orleans show: Firm nab-
ties $50 1885, nominal assets. S3s2og; actuA assets
$25G S54: John r Tamage. individual debts sllloo:
Individual assets sl2tJ2; Daniel Talmage. individual
assets $500 and liabilities. The principal Items
on the asscts are Merchandise ss)53l machinery IN
Columbia rice mill IL Brooklyn. nominal $1,000.
actual s25.p.; real estate AT East Hampton. Long
Island nominal $l22'5s. actual S7C27; accounts re-
ccvable nominal $35535. actual S2'i39: cash. $3.50:
stocks and mortgages. 1872. Merchandise 10 the
amount OF s7 3o IL hypothetical 10 banks FOR loans.
also stocks TO the amount Of Ss9l2. The figures
10 the actual assets are based what would b.
realized upon tnem in the usual course Of business.
but at A forced sale the amount Is estimated at
sl4o377 There Is due to eight banks In this city
Sl41 COO OF which SGS 90 is secured.
Judgments aggrcraiing S6.35 were entered yes
terday against James VI. Waterbury and Chaunccy
Marshall who composed the late firm Of l.. Water
bury & Co. cordage manufacturers, OF No 1875
Front-st and executions were issued TO Deputy
Sheriff Butter. They in favor OF various cutoff
town banks on N tho firm Of l.. Waterbury
Co. made between December 1892. and April, 1893
Judgment for $l29.2io 10 rendered yesterday
by a Jury before Justice Freedman N the Supreme
Court in favor Of Barring. Magoun Co. against L.
Waterbury T. Co. The amount represents a loan Of
f25O with interest. made to Waterbury & Co on
December q. 1882 for which bonds and securities
were given. Waterbury q CO. refused to pay back
the Loan alleging that II made on behalf OF the
National Cordage Syndicate. which failed. With IN"
failure he securities became worthless. and when
a demand was made for the money II was not forth
coming II was contcnded by Alan McCulloh. coun-
sci for Barring. Magoun e Co. that the syndicate
was not known IN the matter when the loan was
made and that J.. Waterbury Co. were directly
and solely responsible.
Leon & H. Blum. wholesale dealers In drygo)is
and notions at Galveston. Tex, who made an ms
s,gnment there on Tuesday. have an Office In this
city at NO. l23 Duene-st. which IL IN cnarge OF
Uvman Blum OF the partners, who I'VE, mere
Their statement OF January l. 1896 1t is said showed
business assets OF 81 90 JJ exclusive Of rea. estate.
and liabilities OF Yl).OM The firm has, II is re-
ported about one hundret creators mere, lyman
EIum Is quote das saying that he could not give
an" de0nite figures az 10 liabilities. but that he
did not think they would exceed &.oO.tO or $4,000
Iocoh Ilurn a brother. yesterday attributed the
sss,ynmen 70 du., business and poor collections.
Tbe house has been In business forty years
1ho Complete Electric Construction company OF
No ~ Iibcrty-st has gone into the hands OF re-
! ceiver Charles Hlldane Johnson. VINO was APP
! noln,cd Yesterday by Judge Beckman. or the SUI
irene Court Mr. Johnson haylnS also been ap-
nnointed receiver in New-Jersey The Application Tor
tbe receiver was made by Philip J. Bennett, tho
secretary OF the company. The Liabilities are $500
nominal assets 10000 and actual assets $4,000 10
|