Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1896-10-30

tons upon the powers conferred, 10 AZ.
contains imltatious upon the powers of
the state. The rovufument ubIci il
created 10 fseaIded o. one % the enun
etaiel and delegated n1wuu. Onii,
other hsui while the Stale CIndiiu.
tiln contains some maudat.fy Urnvil.
ions with others uisiinsuHhiHg tlt
dspAfimouts a tho govern uypt. AMI
specifying the duties Of various niece
lhercp, 10 contains mnlY limiIttisns
uI0n the state AID ia fegatJ tn b
| rgnsfii fausn Nc q ilmtat.ln anon the
Slate government. lhc authority of
The general government D. h.csrtaiuet
itom the powers delegated, wh.ls
I oie OF the state govern.
ment ate sscefiainod from ihoss
Mt prohibited. Tue towois N The
fifs, afs described by thate tule.
gated. and the p0vor OF the latter
consist q those oct prohibited. This
lsayes the Slate Legislature In the
POSSESSION Of NJ the law mating
power not =, ohibited 10 It BY tho Con.
suiution OF the Unitei States, of tue
laws made In nursusncs Il IL, OF by
Tie State Constitution.
Tho enactment Of tomo laws n made
mandstofyi the enactment n others
IL LEFT TO tho disofuii0n Of tue Legisla.
tuto a the public welfare may 10.
maud. Among the mandatory pro.
Visions Of the Constitution VI thir
state, u the one under consideration.
IL 10 claimed inst the tuscimsnt Of
the statute in question VS. forbidden
BY section 7, % article I ~ the Constl.
tuition Of the State, whlch 10 that "No
pefa1n shall BE- deprived % liie, liberty
o. rfopufiy, without cue Process Il
law.D
Tho petitioner insists that bis trial
was not, aud that bis impfisaument IA
not, according IN "tt . law " tue laudi'
btCaufo the statute nxiug the period Of
labor VI . labDfing man ~ undsfxfouud
miuts, was, 49, ne claims, forbidden by
tue q institution, ard therefore void.
IL the Legislature had power 10 pa,s
the law, there wHs no valid otjso,ioa
10 hia trial, nos aui imprisonment. III
the law was valid, the usual and ofdi.
NARY process was adopted; u II wAs not
valid tue defendant was deprived OF
bis liberty without due lrocese Of law,
tits also insisted tbAt tho rT.vislons
oithU State law were forbidden by sec.
ten j, oi article ~, Of the Consultation
Of the United stsies, as follower "AlI
persons born or natufniiasd In the
United Slater, aud subject TO
the juris Iietion thereof. ats
clizens OF the United gtaier.
anu of the state wherein they reside.
No state shall make or eniofos ANY law
which shAll sbrid,e the PRIVILEGES on
inmunitie, oi clllE1us Of the United
slstcsi uof shall any state dspiiye any
person VI life, liberty OF property with.
out due pr, CO.'S Of law, nor deny 10 any
porsun within it, lufisdiclion,t the equal |
protection Of tho law"
Thts section declares, Let. That all !
tstsons born VI nalufAiiEed 10 the |
Uoiled States aud cut 1cl to the |
Jurisdiction thereof, are citEens Of the |
United states aud OF the state wherein |
they tssidC-tbUy are made clti1sus VI |
two distinct govetnmentr. 2nd. IL de-. |
clafes that "No state shall make or On. |
force any law which shall hbfidgo the |
privileges Or immuuitigs OF citlEins Of |
tbs United Stats."
Toe enactment Of state lave deprlv.
log o. abfii ging privileges on i'm. |
mupitles OF citizens Of the state IL left |
TO the staio legislature ~ far AZ thi. |
provision goes. 10 secures h citizens |
OF the United states In any state, the |
privilege aud immunitirs Of tue Cit. |
gems Of that state.
Expounding the provision row un.
der oonsiiuiatlou, tue Suptrme court