The morning times., 1896-03-22
RECORD OF THE COURTS.

Equity Court, No. 2, Justice HaRner-
Smith VS.. Mann; decree dismissng bll.
Nav VS. Stellwageu; time to take testimony
limited. Cost vs.. Cost. 90. CoStn vs.
COstin: decree authorizing guardian 10
make additional loan OF $500.
Equity Court, No. l. Justice CoX-War-
uer valley Stock VS.. Secretary OF the In
terror: in junction denied and bill dismissed.
Stea arkwcat thcr VS.. Hubbard; restraining
order rcturuahle March q, 1886 granted.
Fowler vs.. Slater; further testimony al
lowed Hanger VS.. McGrath; j Veh-
meyer & Son admitted parties complain
ant. Crawford Manufacturing Company
VS.. Murphy, Dennis and Maria Barrett al
lowed to intervene Lazarus VS.. Augeh-
stein: time TO file bond extended seven
days Penns ylvana Railroad Company
VS. Brown: payment of fund in registry
to C.. Brown, ordered.
Circuit court No. /, Justice Bradley
Cumberland Hydraulic Cen ent and Manu-
featuring Company VS.. Wheatley; II otion
for new trial filed. BantZ administrator VS..
Washington and Georgetown Railroad Com
pany: demurrer to second plea sustained.
Bennctt vs. District OF Columbia; III oti0n for
new trial overruled and Judgment on verdict
for defendant. Watson VS.. Du Pont ct al.
Judgment of condem nation. BayerSdorfer X
Co VS. Studer: motion to retaX costs over
ruled Stuckert VS.. District OF Colum ba;
do. Fenwck VS.. Alpha Lite Insurance Com,
many: motion for new trial overruled ana
Judgment on verdict for plantlfT. WakeTlelh
VS. Potomac Brick & Tile Co.: Judgment Ior
Times Company; motion for new trial over
ruled and Judgment on verdict FOR pla u1i.
Miller VS.. Burnhardt; motion to quash writ
of certiorari granted. two cases.
Criminal court. No. 2, Justice Cole
civil Gases ouiso MOhler VS.. District of
columbia. n otiOn for new trial oVerruied.
We Dodge VS.. F. Freund; motion for new
trial overruled and Judgment on verdict.
Circuit Court No. 2-JuStice McComas-
Belt VS.. Magruder; motion to strike out
amended declaration overru!ed, motloh TO
compel pa yment of costs oYerruletl, motion
of G. C. W. Magruder as to pleading over,
ruled: exceptions noted and leave TO plead
i'm twenty days Shea VS.. District of Co
lumbia: Judgment in eertiorari. Ritz VS..
District of Columbia; do. wood vs.: DIS
trict of Columbia; do. Portner VS.. Dlstrlcs
Columbia; do. Havenner VS.. District of
Columbia; do. Bloom VS.. District of Co
lumba; do. Burdette VS.. ID istrict or
Columbia; do. American Security ana
Trust Company VS. District of Columbia: do.
Ely & Company VS.. Ley; motion for new
trial overruied and Judgment on verdict.
Collier VS.. O'FarreH; motion TO Withdraw
joinder and for Judgment overruled. Fay
VS.. Gilbert: motion for commission TO issue
TO take deposition granted. BurnStine VS..
Glaser; motion for Judgment overruled.
-
'King's Palace Grand Opening"
Kings Palace Will throw open its doors
on Monday for the Grand Annual Spring
ODclllllS. 1HItIlOI heiNG hSSh
in progress for the past month, and for this
great event OF the season it will be q
veritable palace of beauty-begemmed and
beflowered in truly regal splendor. The
best efforts of the creative genius of two
hemispheres have been brought to bear
upon the success OF this opening. Millinery
in profusion-yet most select In styles
Hats and Bonnets, to suit the tastes Of the
most fastidious ladies' some are substantial
in makeup. others fragile and airy. Paris,
Berlin, London, and New York have paid
tribute to makethlsopeninga a grandsuccess
Elaborate Wraps, Capes, Suits, and Waists
will be on exhibit. These will EN- bra ce every
thing novel and recherche. Ribbonswill also
hold a prominent part-and we must not
overlook the flowers which almost outriyal
natures own production. Bowers Of beauty
will greet you on every hand, but a written
description OF this grand opening is beyond
| the limits of the pen. You must attend and
see this great event, which will THANKS to
the interchangeable energy OF the Manager,
Mr.. Harry King surpass in beauty and
loveliness anything ever attempted here.