The herald., 1896-10-27

, was instructed to deposit the amount
| in the city treasury, and that warrants
i be drawn against the same by the par
{, ties interested.
CITY ENGINEERS REPORT
/ The city engineer presented the fol-
1 lowing report:
In the matter of the storm water on
Main street. between River and Chest
| nut streets, we find the pipe now laid
| in very bad condition. and recommend
that it be uncovered and repaired and
extended to Chestnut street. The cost
would be about $4,000. Also that a "a
! inch storm drain be laid, on DoMney
! avenue. from 'Sichel street to the river
| We estimate the cost of this to be $410U
| Referred.
! In the matter of the storm water al
Pearl and Sand streets and Temple and
Fremont streets, we find there is a 30
inch storm drain, with catch basins, al
| these points in very bad condition, being
| almost filled with sand. We recommend
that the pipe and catch basins be clean
| ed. So ordered.
Ordinance establishing grade of Ninth
street, from point 1894 feet west of
| Carondelet street to Hoover street
| Adopted.
Ordinance establishing the grade of
| Twenty-fifth street, from Hoover street
to Vermont avenue. Adopted.
Ordinance establishing the grade of
boundary to a point 1884 feet north.
Adopted.
Ordinance changing and establishing
the grade of the east side of Hoover
street from Twenty-first to Twenty
fourth street. Adopted.
BIDS OPENED
The following bids were opened and
referred to the proper committees:
To purchase electric light franchise
G. e. de Camp proposed for the sum of
$3.50, William Garland proposed for the
sum of $2157 William r. Stats proposed
for the sum of $1107, Fred A. Walton
proposed for the sum of $1025. Referred
to- the board of public works.
To improve Ninth street. from Pearl
to Westlake avenue-F. c. Harmon pro-
posed: Curb, 26 cents per lineal foot;
sidewalk, 91a cents per square foot.
Frank Gillespie proposed: Curb, 81
cents per lineal foot sidewalk, 11%
cents per square foot.
l.. f. Bacon proposed: Curb, "a cents
per lineal foot; sidewalk, 121a cents per
square foot.
c. L. McCombs proposed: Curb, 81
cents per lineal foot; sidewalk 1O3l cents
per square foot.
David Mulrein proposed: Curb, 80
cents per lineal foot; sidewalk, 10 cents
per square foot
j. r. Mccormack proposed: Curb, 2S
cents per lineal foot; sidewalk 91h cents
per square foot
Referred to the board of public works.
10 improve Ceres avenue, from Sixth
street to Seventh street: William T.
Riley proposed: Grading and graveline.
Sl.30 per lineal foot; curb, 35 cents per
lineal foot; cutters. II cents per lineal
foot; crosswalk, 81 per lineal foot
sam McCray proposed: Grading and
graveling. "a cents per lineal foot; curb,
30 cents per lineal foot; sidewalk, 10
Foot. n-
lineal foot; crosswalks, rs cents per lin
cal foot
Miles Dodd. jr., proposed Grading
and graveling, So cents per lineal foot;
curb, 81 cents per lineal foot; cutters,
16 cents per lineal foot; sidewalk, ii
cents per square foot sewer, 70 cents
per lineal foot; crosswanl, 81 per lineal
foet, % f.e-r- D.t
M. Zuretti proposed Grading and
graveling, $1.3O per lineal foot; curb, "a
cents per lineal foot; sidewalk, II cents
per square foot; sewer, rs cents per lin
cal foot; crosswalk, 40 cents per lineal
foot. sn1 ~
P. J.. Richmond proposed: Grading and
graveling. 6S cents per lineal foot: curb,
2S cents per lineal foot; sidewalk, 91h
cents per square foot; sewer, II cents
per lineal foot; crosswalk, 80 cents Fer
lineal foot.
J. e. White proposed: Grading and
graveling, 70 cents per lineal foot curb,
30 cents per lineal foot; sidewalk, 91a
cents per square foot; sewer S6 cents per
lineal foot
c. l.. McCombs proposed: Grading and
graveiing, 80 cents per lineai foot curb,
29 cents per lineal foot; sidewalk, 9%
cents per square foot; sewer, ~ cents
per lineal foot; crosswalk, 80 cents per
lineal foot h b. 5.-
M. v. Howard proposed: Grading and
graveling, n cents per iineal foot: curb
26 cents per lineal foot; sidewalk, 91s
cents per square foot; sewer, so cents per
lineal foot.
Stansbury g. Moore proposed: Grad
ing and graveling, "A cents per lineal
foot; curb, % cents per lineal foot: side
walk, cents per lineal foot; sewer, II
cents per lineal foot.
French & Reed proposed: Grading
curb, "a cents per lineal foot; sidewalk,
II cents per square foot; sewer complete,
II cents per lineal foot.
Referred to the board of public works.
: To improve Whittier street, from
Seventh to Ninth streets: w. L. Riley
proposed; Grading and graveling. s2.4O
per lineal foot; curb, Is cents per lineal
foot; cutters. 16 cents per lineal foot
crOsswalk, 81 per lineal foot
w. |. Shanklin proposed: Grading and
graveling, s1.9S per lineal foot; curb, 20
cents per lineal foot; cutters, II cents
Pei iHedi looe, CToSSWdlk, 30 cents per
lineal foot
Miles Dodd, .jr.. proposed: Grading
and graveling, $1.55 per lineal foot; curb,
Is cents per lineal foot; cutters, 10 cents
per lineal foot; crosswalk, 81 per lineaI
foot.
j. S. Haigler proposed: Grading and
graveling, $1.S9 per lineal foot; curb,
121s cents per lineal foot; cutters, 10
cents per lineal foot
F. S. Harmon proposed: Grading and
graveling, $1.9S1s per lineal foot; curb,
II cents per lineal foot; cutters, Is cents
per lineal foot; crOsswalk, 81 per lineal
foot.
Stansbury & Moore proposed: Grading
and graveling. $1.25 per lineal foot; curb,
Is cents per lineal foot; cutters, u cents
per lineal foot.
Robert Sherer proposed: Grading and
graveling, 81 per lineal foot; curb, 16
cents per lineal foot; cutters, 13 cents
per lineal foot.
c. l.. McCombs proposed: Grading
and graveling, $1.67 per lineal foot: curb.
20 cents per lineal foot; cutters, 1S cents
per lineal foot; crosSwalk, 80 cents per
lineal foot.
D. F. Donegan proposed: Grading and
graveling, $140 per lineal foot; curb, 15
cents per lineal foot; CUTTERS, Is cents
per lineal foot; crosswalk, 81 per lineal
foot
Samuel McCray proposed: Grading
and graveling, $2.6S per lineal foot; curb,
1S cents per lineal foot; cutters, 20
cents per lineal foot; crosswa1k, so cents
per lineal foot
F. A. McGreal proposed Grading and
graveling. $l.99% per lineal foot: curb,