The San Francisco call., 1896-11-05
Some Rather Peculiar Features
That Were Developed by
the Count.
CLEAVAGE IN PUBLIC FAVOR
FELL ABOUT EVENLY.
Three Proposed Measures Were Adopted and
Three Were Rejected by Very Decisive
and Unmistakable Votes

The complete returns, for this City on
the general ticket in full from the 3l3 pre-
cincts show some interesting results.
The constitutional amendments Jared
rariously. Amendment No. l, exempting
mortgages and trust deeds from taxation,
is defeated; and so also are amendment 3.
limiting the liza abiiity of stockholders in
corporations, and amendment 6, the last
referring 10 woman suffrage. The vote on
these amendments was as follows: No. 1.
IL, 124 for and 80, ,762 against; No. 3, 15,453
for and 20,025 against; No. 6, 13. 144 for and
SO, ,566 against.
The amendments which carried in this
City are No. ., which provides that all
elections shall be by ballot or by such
ether method as may be prescribed by
preserved and which received 25,665 votes
in favor and IL, ,39S against; No. 4. prohib-
iting the creation of corporations for
municipal purposes by special law. the
vote being 22,629 for and ,134 against;
and No. 5, which enables city charters to
fix the times, ETC., for the terms of Police
Judges, members of the Board of Educa-
ton, Police Commissioners and boards of
election, the vote being %, 041 for and 49,
127 against.
The amount of interest manifested in
the several amendments may be indicated
by the total vote concerning each, which
was as follows: No. 1, Al $50; No. 2, SO, ,064;
No. 8, 35,47S; No. 4, 81. 1853; No. 5. 80, 16s;
No. 6, As, 10. The woman suffrage amend
ment drew votes for and against exceed
ing by 1924 votes the total drawn by the
next highest.
The Republican electors had 80 951, the
Democrats Gncluding the Populists)
30.512, the National Democrats 304, the
Socialist Labor party 755, the National
party 175, and the Prohicitionists 122
votes. This gives the Mckinley electors a
plurality of 439 votes in the total count.
The total vote for Presidential electors
in this City in 1892 was as follows: Cleve-
land 81, ,O22, Harrison "a, 4i6, Weaver Pop.
250S. Bidwell Pro. 489. The majority for
Cleveland was 5000.
The total vote for Presidential electors
this year was g. S19; in 1892 he total was
IS, ,435.
For Congress-In the Fourth Mcguire
r. has run away from Kelly d.
Braunhart D., Pop. and G. Mp. carries
the Seventeenth Senatorial District as
against Burnham r.
Dwyer d. p. defeats Dare r. in the
Nineteenth Senatorial District.
Wolfe r. carries the Twenty-first Sena-
torial District in opposition to Asher D.
p. C. Mp.
Hall D. P. ran away from Tyrrell C. r.
in the Twenty-third Senatorial District.
Feeney D. carried the Twenty-ffth Sena-
torial District over Chandler r.
The victorious candidates for the As.
bly, are:
Lacy D. P, C. Mp. in the Twenty
eighth District.
Allen d. P, c. Mp. in the Twenty.
ninth District.
Harmon D. p, C. Mp. in the Thir-
tieth District.
Treacy A-C. D. and P. in the Thirty
first District.
Power D. P, c. Mp. in the Thirty
second District.
: Godfrey d. and c. Mp. in the Thirty
third District.
Mahoney D. in the Thirty-fourth Dis
trict.
Dolan D., A-C. D. and P. in the Thirty
fifth District.
McGrath D. P. and A-C. D. in the
Thirty-sixth District.
Mulcrevy D. P. in the Thirty-seventh
District.
Pohlman R. in the Thirty-eighth Dis
tric:.
Jones R. in the Thirty ninth District.
Bettman d. c. r. and C. Mp in the
Fortieth District.
Dibble R. in the Fortv-iir first District.
Henry r. c. Mp. in the Forty-second
District.
Dennery C. R. in the Forty-third Dis.
irict. The vote was very close, Dennery,
c. R. polling -698 votes and Lundquist
691
Ryan D. in the Forty fourth District.
Gately D. c. Mp. in the Forty fifth
District.
The full vote on the general ticket is in