Daily capital journal. (Salem, Or.) 1896-1899, 1896-02-04

so fHf as UIe UuilDCl VI SNs -
filed with him, are concerned, anu
is now requesting bids for the prine5,
ing of the dockets, these TO be Opeheu
about Thursday.
The list of cases already begun 10 ae
follows:
DEPARTMENT NO. I.
Actions for money
M. NJ. Ellis VS.. T. j. Ford ,.
Henness Bros. VS.. Allen q ShllVh
and Searle & Deane. IT
Smell, Heitschue & Woodland vs. H.
w. Cox. ,n,,on
Gilbert Bros. vs.. Whale 4 Galllher'
Feldman g. Cole vs. Levy McGhee.
Wayland Stayton VS.. ID. Il. Stayton'
w. w. Kimball & Co. vs. l.. II. NC
Mahan. -,
JIG. Goodale VS.. L. NJ. Hensal ct al
Walter A. Wood Harvester 90. vs.
r. J. Chandler.
A. NJ. Smith and Fl. T. Coleman vs.
A. T. and +. N. Gilbert.
RI. Sabin VS.. G.. W. Kearns ct a.
Pacific Land & Orchard Co. VS.. W.
IL. Wild. o,o
The Rosenfeld Smith Co. IA corpora
ilon) VS.. w. \. Benson.
John Slough VS.. Iver Larson,
A. Bush VS.. b. A. Witzel ct al.
VIM. Hall vs. Geo. +. Aplin ct al.
Chas. Becke VS.. Geo. II. Saubert.
Mailman & MangOld VS.. Grant >.
Manning. s
Olive s. England vs.. VIM. England.
Geo. Collins VS.. G. B. Moores ct u.
Don Poy VS.. Chau Book Way ct al
and Fung Sing Co.
A. Bush VS.. f. w. Godfrey ct al.
Silverton and Portland Land Loan
and Investment Co. VS.. j. II. HAM
mOnd.
Hugh p. McNary, receiver OF the
williams & England Banking Co., VS..
Geo. Williams.
The American Fire Insurance Co.
VS.. S. j. Kerr.
Thomas Chairman VS.. o. p. Boards
ley. o
John +. Miller VS.. Mary j. Crayton:
Jessie T.. Rohrer VS.. Isabel and
Charles Simon.
ON. Henderson & Co. VS.. G. w.
Read & Son.
]. r. Loughmiller VS.. w. K. Lough-
miller ct al.
RI. Sabin VS.. Keller & Sons.
r.. l.. Sabin VS.. Geo. w. johnson X
Son.
Pacific Lounge s. Mattress Co. VS..
Keller & Sons.
The Salem Light g. Power Co. vs..
| The Salem Consolidated Street RAIL
way Co.
(. Veal & Sons VS.. Keller & Sons.
George N. Sroat ct al VS.. Lucretla
Burton.
n. Goodman & Sons VS.. Nancy
| Keene, ct al.
Samuel Ramp VS.. J.C. Johnson,et al.
William Rigby VS.. G. w. Johnson q
Son.
Macondry & Co. VS.. Keller & Sons.
Jerome G.. Gingrich VS.. Christian
KurtZ.
Henry II. sievers vs. Samuel b.
Brown.
Chas. Scott as the Woodburn Mill
ing Co., VS. j. w. Sinclair & Son.
Ladd & Bush VS.. j. III. Mccormick
ct al.
George j. Pearce, administrator
VS.. j. III. Mccormick ct al.
Mason. Ehrman & Co., vs.. j. H.
Mccormick.
Ladd & Bush VS.. George Williams,
ct nj.
w. A. Hamilton and John Moir VS..
j. II. and Rachel Il. Thomas.
b. #. Mulkey VS.. Thomas Town
send.
c. w. Hollis VS.. ID. n. Richardson.
| CD. Whitaker VS.. DIN. Richardson.
Samuel Ramp VS., W. II. Murphy
ct al.
John f. Steiwer VS.. p. Van Bnren
and G. w. Eppler.
A. II. Dagney VS.. y. j. CONN.
A. Blosser VS.. j. Ii. Ramage.
A. Blosser VS.. James McGill.
III. f. Allen and G. ii. Lewis, part
ners as Allen & Lewis, vs.. j. A. Van
Eaton.
T. d. Humphreys VS.. j. L. Shorey
ct al.
The Rosenfelt Smith Co., VS.. j. a
Van Eaton.
The Capital LAUNDERING Co. IA cor
: pOration) VS.. N. NJ. Learned.
Peter Feller, jr., vs.. VIM. Veether
n. Goodman 4 Sons VS.. Nj. j. Egan
j. Reynolds VS.. John Patterson, e
al.
/ IL. p. McNary, receiver Williams
/ England Banking Co., VS.. f. NJ. anC
Il. s. Rice.
~ uooulluh ~ DOho Nos W. II
Egan, ct al.
n. Goodman & Sons VS., PatricI
/ Egan, ct al.
y L. Writ VS., oregon Wholesale Nur
Z sery Co., ct al.
Ladd & Bush VS.. VIM. II. Egar
!. ct al.
Other cases in department No. l an
: as follows:
j. +. Cook VS.. w. III. Byars; suit fO
: the recovery OF personal property an
a damages.
! Butler, Schutze & Co. VS.. ID. h
N Fisk 4 Co.; conversion.
j. n, Skaife, administrator of til
estate OF ID. NJ. Keene, VS.. +. j. Nic'
lat; replevin.
X. r.. Ryan VS., Southern Pacific Co
damages.
State of Oregon VS.. Frank Brehn
striking and wounding a sheriff.
Elma Simmons VS.. t. l.. Colder
ejectment.
: Thompson & Co. VS.. Victor Camb;
ct al; replevin.
W. $, Taylor VS.. Amos Beach; T,
plevin,
VIM. j, Huffman ct al. VS.. job
knight; action for damages for wron
rs ful conversion.
er Sam IL, Brown VS.. Southern Pacii
Co.; damages.
a