The Manning times. [volume] (Manning, Clarendon County, S.C.) 1884-current, 1896-03-04
DECLARED INNOCENT.
VERDICT OF THE JURY IN THE COL
LETON CASE.

WATERFORD, Feb. 25.-"Gentle-
men of the jury, have you agreed
upon verdictl'
1--WE have"
It's midnight. The old court house
of Colleton county is dimly lighted.
the body of the building being IN
semi-darkness. The figures of the
prisoners are imperfectly seen in the
dock, which is elevated five feet above
the floor. At the rail dividing the bar
from the public portion OF the hall,
there is a wall of white faces. Men
have been pushing and struggling fer
an advantageous position, but now
hush falls upon the assemblage.
& few minutes before, when the
news that the jury had agreed was
heard on the quiet streets, men had
seemed to spring from the ground,
and in an incredibly short time hun
dreds were struggling and pushing up
the winding stone steps of the court
house, surging into the building, al
most overpowering the force of depu
ties stationed along the railing.
But Judge Aldricb had arrived and
the stiffness OF OF ff-a-vvsstuff vault now reigned.
Around table lighted by one Of the
three kerosene lamps in the hall, were
three or four special correspondents.
The Rev. G. II. Ackerman, father of
DR.. W. II. .Ackerman, sat by the side
of his wife, his white hair and beard
being conspicuous in the uncertain
light. The devoted mother, who has
so faithfully attended the court, was
bent forward, handkerchief pressed
to her eyes. Several girls, relatives
of the prisoners, were seated about the
dock, serious but not deeply moved.
The prisoners looked straight ahead.
'Wait a moment, Mr. Clerk, said
the judge, who then warned the audi
ence against any demonstration.
Let the verdict be read" he said
The State against W. B. Acker.
man, Frank Jenny, Frank Brant and
Wyman Kearse; indictment for mur-
der-not guilty
A smile spread over DR.. Ackerman's
face as the last words fell from the
clerks lips. His father let his face
fall in his hands with sob; his moth
er seemed to press the handkerchief
closer to her eyes. The other defend
ants were unmoved.
Perfect silence continued for sec
ond, when some one tapped the floor
with his feet, but stern command Of
silence cut off the applause. Court
was then adjourned.
a hundred men pressed about the
dock from all sides. while the prison
ers stood up and received their enthu-
siastic congratulations. Mrs. Acker-
man was overcome with emotion and
the other ladies wepG aloud.
The jurymen then fled by Rev. MIR.
Alderman, who, still weeping, took
each one by the hand with fervent
"God bless you" The mother was
the next, with tear-bedimmed eyes,
to give thanks to these - men, who
then shook hands with the four occu-
pants of the dock and several friends
of those men.
The prisoners were remanded to
jail, being under Indictment for the
murder of Isham Kearse.
Such is human nature and so it ever
will be. In this friendly circle the
conviction of these men would have
been considered crime too terrible to
contemplate; the enornity of the Of
fense charged against them was over
sbadowed, forgotten, in the moment
Of danger to those for whom they have
regard, and all the influence of pow
erful connection has been exerted to
spread that feeling to the minds of
neighbors. "Why should our friends
be the first to fall before this newly
aroused public sentiment, when if they
killed these people they did not intend
to take life2"
On the other side, those living be-
yond this little circle of friends and
acquaintances of the defendants, chose
who know that neither the leading
counsel nor the prisoners will deny
that the latter committed the crime of
whipping, those who have given in
telligent and unbiased attention to the
evidence and have heard distinguished
lawyers make desperate effort to Gre
ate the shadow of defense, must re-
alize that this was another case in
which-from whatever cause.-The
eyes of Justice have been bounG and
the unbalanced scales taken from her
hands-ar.d in the sight of an enlight-
ened, order loving country, liberty is
unprotected, truth is without honor
and justice is mockery.
Colonel Aldrich in open court today
made an oral application for bail for
the six prisoners in jail-the four de-
PENDANTS in the Hannah Walker case
and HERS and Campbell in the case
in which they are charged with the
murder of Isham Kearse. The last
two have not been indicted.
The motion was made on the ground
that the prisoners were ready to 60 to
trial and could not do so, and that
there being great similarity between
the cases of Hannah Walker and IS
ham Kearse, and as the evidence would
be the same, the verdict of acquittal
in the former should be taken as
legal conclusion that in the second
case the proof of their guilt was moi
apparent nor ''the presumption great"
''If the verdict of a jury deserves
credit-and it must have credit in this
court-the presumption Of their in.
nocence is here"
Solicitor Bellinger opposed the mo-
ton on legal grounds. To suppose
that the testimony in the
case of Isham Kearse will be
the same as in that of Hannah Wal
ker, is to do so without the founda.
ton of knowledge of the facts, for he
was the only man in the court house
who knew.
Solicitor Bellinger opposed the
n1otio1 by defendants, coun-
sci for bail, which was made
on the ground that the evidence
for the State in the case of 1sham
Eearse would be the same as in that of |