The Indianapolis journal., 1896-03-28

real estate. in the absence of creditors.
and at her death descended 10 his heirs.
and was not controlled by the provisions o.
1856. Morrison va. Morrison. Kosciusko
c. c.. Affirmed Hackney. C.. jim an.
stead OF evidence. a bill of exceptions Is
necessary to present any question arising
f71S. Pigg VS.. the State. Sullivan c. c.
Affirmed. Howard. i'll. An unlawful kiii-
ing may be either voluntary. upon a sudden
heat. or 1T may be involuntary and IN the
commission OF some unlawful act, and IN
either case the offense is included in the
greater charge of murder. 2. When the.
prosecuting attorney refers TO matters out
side OF the record in improper language,
the courts sustain an objection to the Ian
glage and condemn the same in instructins
the jsy Without prejsdice mo to me sen
Petition for rehearing overruied.
14io. McGianis VS. Boyd. Lake C. e.
Petition for reiearing oyerruled.
177T. Douthitt VS.. the State. Sullivan
c. c.. Petition for rehearing overruled-
1884. Fesler VS.. Brayton. Marion &.
Leave granted to file counter-affidavhs to
Appellate Court.
1872 Crumrine vs. Crumrine. Wabash c.
G. Affirmed. Gavin. c. il. A note gwen
by husband and wife TO a son, payable after
their death is not enforceable against the
estate of the mother when it Is SHOWN that
the debt is one of the husband. 2. A claim
ant against an estate has the burden
Of the the note o sued ned on. m ). The Judge should
certify to the correctness of affidavits in
corporated in a bill of exceptions.
DeKaib c. c. Affirmed. Ross, IA munich
pal corporation is not required 10 detend
It's officers in the performance OF their
duties, as promising to defend a marshal In
case ne is sued for false imprisonment.
1909. c. & s. K. Railway Company vs.
station. Clinton c: {. Affirmed Davis J.
A bill of exceptions containing the evil
dence can only be fled after the expiration
of the term in which the Judgment Is rem
dered and the motion for a new trial over,
by the court in term time to the party de.
string to avail himself of this right, and
such warrant must appear from the courts
record.
Room 1--John L. Mcyaster. Judge.
Henry Beville VS.. Indianapolis Light and
Power Company; damages. On trial by jury
Room 2-Lawson NJ Harvey. Judge.
Pabst Brewing Company VS.. Thomas
Neely; notes. Judgment against defendant
William L. Wright VS.. John Hoera ct al:
mechanics lien. Judgment against Hoera
ant Frick against codefendants for SSS
Foreclosure and sale.
Arthur Leopold vs. William l. Ripley;
street lien. Dismissed and costs paid; s
John Gaddie ct al; foreclosure. Judgment
and decree against defendants for Sl,O2S.5o
John Deford VS.. Eva Mcclellan ct al; me-
ciianic's lien. On trial by court.
Room 3-Pliny w. Bartholomew. Judge.
Mary d. Henderson VS.. c., II. & I. and c.,
H. & D. Railroad Companies; damages. On
Circuit Court.
Edgar A. Brown, Judge.
Sarah Roberts VS.. Susan NJ. Schofield ct al ;
foreclosure. On trial by court.
New Suits Filed.
The St. Clair Investment Company VS.,
George o. Richardson et al; suit to foreciose
mortgage Circuit Court. y
John NJ. CraDor Leah Cranor; divorce.
Superior Court, Room l.
George r. Sorrells VS.. Lizzie Sorrels; dit
yorce Superior Court. Room 5.
Cornelius ID. Browder ct al. VS.. Letitia
Talbot; Improvement lien. Superior Court,
Room ?. nt
Cornelius ID. Browder ct al. VS.. f. o, Shaw
ct al; street improvement lien. Superior
Court, Room l.
The Indiana Bond Company VS. Catherine
f. Elder suit to foreclose Improvement bond.
Circuit Court.
Jennie Mccoy VS.. Frank Mccoy; suit Tor
| divorce. Circuit Court ,t