The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1896-08-15

~ figures do not correctly show in
lss the actual populisiic Increase or
as In Colorado. for Instance, tho
Mt vote OF 1882 shows the fusion
Pcratk and poppllst vote. In 1891 Che
resfonal election the democrats had
lniiiate, and divided thur votes be
ihs republicans and populists. In
me democratic and popullst votes
pnnchcd together in lSel and scpa-
IN ikH The Kansas vote OF 1892
The combined democratic and popu-
ae, while in 1871 they were divided.
Nebraska In 1872 there was a b tier
among the democra ts over tine Ques-
M iusen en- the ropulist electoral
The local democratic ,e1ders fear
ley might lose their power in their
zen was defeated. but the democratic
IVY was defeated. bat the democratic
which had beer so.5t2 IN 1855 and
Nv dwIndled down TO 2i,9is. in
w UNION with the populists on gov
y was TSh. and GiS5 votes were
or silver democratic candidate.
a..mocNal'e-populist governor carried
North Dakota the demarat!c and
NJ, vo'es were counted together as
yey,sh. ~ esld separately IN 1924.
ior a n N lS9l the vote Of i523 was
srerhor Jones. the silver can
g Tor a pcpulist.
InnE al the total nopulist vote NJ
49, III, some democratic votes nre
u srr Included IN cases where demo-
nr ropulist candidates. Bui
M, V"s.i ny The fact thai ia North
ia wnsre The republicans iused
a ~, pspuilsls III elecitng n cher ius.
NJ ~ sunfome court, and in Other
ths n,m,,, ,re repuhicans combined
|resmssnnp uiists IN c.ecllng Judges and
hiran a.. 'he votes werp counted as
De non,',,s, no enumeration was made
sN,G2 is az veles. Hence the total
nearly accurate as POS
r, ni'e so. and enthusiasm of tb,s last
\ BY invention, as we'll ms tho ,root
Nfas,.,ss ngnres, show that the nan
mi ,syste Of 1872. '''''''''s"ou since
a. ~ GENERAL? VI
plsls viii iiI,,eu!ous to suppose that the
|eaeins a." not SUPPORT Bryan as II WAS
tsntion a ma, the Chicago democratir
a maior;v,.u'u not avail Itself Of its
y vote ~ 10 make good it's ,wo-
2tiance wiz iay down a platform in
Y own en- its own views and 10 So.
tstct lhs, ,hrd bearer. or as Il was
Sn Would IN, IN 81 Louis populist cen,
rs and prn INV away its chances of
Not be al,nN'o candi0lte vho
M ~ lih a good prnspect ~ 80 70 Il
10 fayor st the popuhst convent,on
fnembers W hCyah's nom nario,, h.,
would nesirtd to act In n ,nn, 81.
intact ana We thor own orpanIzo
Il orRan,.nut merge 1t i'm the dcmo-
& tarnss, ,,ion. The Toxans w,ra
y a uan others en- this rniut no.
a and ~ sneat strength in iheir
d.nocrac,e. much larger stre,e,h 81
the tan but with them. ns win
tiate for ,S M m s'dle-of-ths-roatj'
c a. ths ~ presidency was MS non
he action az OF Side ditch" boi,
N0llINayIIt ne convention is now.
EFnebENT Poni,M:, OF AN INDIE
EisHEsssc PREsiprN,.4 an PIRATE l,,s,
EfpISsLE OF TIKI. IN 30 so.CALLED
EE nWANTED ,1 TS,' CD DELE
NJ innEsNSrlTY or rin,,H.f'sERNES
|lsEcTM,sSInEAD OF JNII.p iroAisTl:
EfE wiz THE pBsS htrIE Sr1
Z sEhVE TO INCRl5AsE
Essss' vote sU,s IN Texas fer ,,ovorr>
' b ssleo and rep%S @lSra,iei :, G 2.soco
md ,he C OF The populsi vo ,ns"n me l,.
n, so, consequent Increase Of ~ n ,Ir
'eiii,s1nsesa eu,cratio vote In ,,o
Us,axht n, ND Increased nv , .ne Mes,
Y .snly i osa nominse for nrosid.r,
-coio, ssaEf'e,l with d em5crsan,seo fon,
m, Idaho, Kansas am and M M
w gDo,. hE DETECTION OF THE
esqs,a., DEFEAT
Issasseer i e., the ,movn, ., d..
4 eoH a,sket from ,bs OF nanger To
:. ,nMSaI,, such s'lsa,,rres IS timrortoat to
~ Of sns ,nNnamser q sista 7 ' ,.,a
LAs Hecouns whatever n ~ IN,
~ sr uEnelera ard ,,,.,.,, Wv
M Nd psrrs,'re, Vermont. Massea
I sta e :, ,lcksis ~ is.s ~. rhe Re.
= aenorr,,".@ rerih,ir,n, r amn may
.r.eaiia,. ~, y bar az ne demo,
.u'd t srly .w.,, 'tifhs .s p. sspsi-
4pSev nnecticnt, NAvrwvor
q .tt. u ~ are. mn 49, WV I0FK