New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1896-03-27
ALLIANCE MADE PLAIN.
WHAT THE VOTE ON THE CoNsoLlDA'
TON BILL SHOWS.
.,,,,.xv urtprp p1.ATT CARRY THE MEASURE

rAuvAxy HELPED PIATT CARRY THE MEAsUHh
rHRorcH-IocAL MEASURES PASSED.
Albany March 26 (SpeciaD.-The Lexow greater
New.york passed the Assembly to-day oy 'o'e
q, 81 yeas to Sc nays. The result was SURPRISE
IN. Kings County men and their suppo''e's' -
,.r davs ago they had hoped for sufficient votes
% defeat tn. Greater New-York bill. but woeh tne
orders were sent out by Mr. Platt 'or all na.'
mon 70 support the BILL the Kings County hgh'ers
lost hone and expected to see the Hrea'ei NC
| YORK bill passed by Republican vote II Is graz
| fving IN them TO feel that their opposition 'o-uas
made plain the alliance between MI ria' ~
Tammany Hall. without the Tammany votes '''
| hill would have been defeated Or the '"e"'' Oh
! Democratic votes for CONSERVATION,
were necessary to the passage OF the Dill hau W.
c,sncbaeld the leader of tire minority. been abe
| 70 carry the Ia nmany men with h;ih' '"e 'o'
| dalton bill would have been defeated oy 'o'e %
| 3, navs TO G., yeas Mr. Robbins. OF Allesany' MI.
Carlisle OF Wcstchester. and Mr. isouh1S' VI
| Cayuss stood by the Kings County meA' III III
face OF Mr. Platts orders. and TO THESE me" i"u Il
Of the good sho wing made to-day is Que - 10 ~
! Ieved by the Kings County men that 1t VII! De III
no.sble To pass the bill over the Mayors veto
The statement was made on the floor to-day ana
und.puted that Mayor Wurster had pledged him-
self prevlous to his election to veto Greater Now
York measure not containing a referendum. ihi'
bin contains no referendum ana the \hSs eo""''
rep: csc atlves say that Mayor Wurster must veto
the bill! or stult!fy himself In not doing So Inc de-
hate on the bill Is reported In other columns OF ne
| Tribune or the ~ members voting on the measure
there were recorded in ,hc affirmative e5 Repuol-
cans and rs Democrats. In the negative there were
% Republicans and IS Democ ats
The eleven Republicans from Kings County voted
against the bill These MessFs. Audett Bren-
ran DeCiraw Forester. Hughes Livingston, Mar
shall. Perkins. Wags,aft. waldo and wilson Seven
OF the ten Democrats from Kings County voted
against the consolidation bill These are Messrs
and Zurn. The remaining three Of the kings oounry
members Messrs. Cain, Ebbetts and Newman
voted for the consolidation OF Brooklyn win Ns s
York. The Referendum bill to-day, offered by Mr.
Marshall, "a a substitute for the Lexow Dill was
| rejected by vote Of 81 to s. .s ., t,e
president OF the Board of Aldermen OF Brooklyn,
was amended and advanced to third Isadn l;, at
originally drafted increased the salary from 5000 to
81. Coz This was amended in committee so that the
Audett amended the BIZ again, and the original in
crease to 1900 was made. The Assembly cites
ioMns BrooKyn .BHI Bis & MP MsrsSas BIZ repeal
ing The law extending Second, ave, Brooklyn. across
yn m aspen a{ $4,000 for free pubic library Mf
Brennans defining the rate Of wages Of employees
upon public works in Brooklyn. and Mr Auiett,s.
repeating the law OF 1898 giving the KINGS county
senator Ways bill Increasing the number OF
Brooklyn from twelve to sixteen.
The Senate cites Committee vii report Senator
Wieman's bill, liking the salary OF members OF ire
bridge-kepers at 100 first 5000 second and $50 third
grade.
Assembym3n Audett's. prohibiting railroads in
Dean-st.: Assemblyman Forrester's. In Leonard-st;
Assombyman Mar-hails. In Monroe and Macon SITS;
Assemhlyman iughess in wSSd6ne,s ,,s without at
kosciusko and Pulaski SIS.