The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1896-04-17
|HEs7 COURT DECISIONS
I,..s Of Opinions Handed Down
at the Last Sitting
RYAN MURDER CASE AFFIRMED
!. .he Rulings by the Ir'''
'' ~. ws,don Loca, Option case
go. Williamson Rovor'e"'

utin Texas, APP" -. a,,,,, nj
, r,r delivered by the court u
nj appeals today: sr,rr rom
70 tor violating the local option
lon asoa,sd from Williamson county
,.rsed and remandeu. ,oor tn ore
'S i, precinct No. of Williamson
wv" hero the local option law was
-, This beer was deliVer.l 10
sosk In hell county. inc lu1,ss sn,a ' 20;
= contract of purchase ai'u s", ~,
e saas prerinct, and the money there
vp IN !, 'constitite violation OF my
WI ,,n !. law If the delivery OF suon
pp'' ~ he al a point outside al surn
n,o w nrecinct--the liquor itself be-
~ lime OF the contract OUTSIDE OF
wi ~ We think not Under no
pvc,ian of the local option law can
ssarar,er of contract constitute
t,n thereof, II so every conttac, ion
Ia Of liquor entered INTO bel Wei
in a local option precinct Wn.r"
elIyery is to be bad outsiic s''lI pre-
~ a,;an in ano, her state, wood con
W yiolation # the local option law
x ,rainct. Reversed ana r,lnanded-
nlor by Davidson j.
rtII, Sr-,Tr conviction
RYAN os.da ,i from Harris conn
Affirmed.
Ma writ of special venire was served
Ansl,an, one full day before the trial,
.., an ,h,t he could rnulirc.
~ ~. W. "i ,s shown ,o have resulted
,ll.' ~, ,bc refusal Of the court
pti'a''. a, ,,in,,apcn ON account of tho
w III nn,,nseI isnnr n. Iindlev.
y VI ne S,J ,,ot err in refusing 10
appsisaa'. ~ W. oro,.,rn rim 70 hen kill
WI Msn'i VIM, Ia n wss comnc,ent 10
' .h.,i i,s'l Inv A areaeod ar 10 show his
,i ren,,,a,}on NJ n dangerous man.
~ , ssi'' az, nro az me aetails of INV
nsi l lra' ~ ,.,,,, VI rn, hoinq mar, Of
.vuv,, s, ,me ~ Inc offrnsa charged
~ s, rsla or in ANY manner in
y a. sp XII. osfcnea Affirmed
.,a III X, n,vidsnn /
aoH W N'' 'N-o-. -
. ,.,;0n " ,or x,alation nf ,he local
~ h ssT. dfp'"''' '' " "
~ =. ., s., ,
no o..i OF exceptions uoeS roe sho"
Dublin was an Incorporated town,
led In the precinct where the alleged
lon occurred. If appellant intended
lect 70 the Introduction oi the peti-
70 me cofniiiisslGhers court upon
Was paseu me oruer lor ths eisol non
bcorporated town was situated in
precinct. and that the petition did
how the necessary numbtr Of sinners
said precinct. then the bin OF en-
sS and not a aons sa as rro nsnS Of o
he judgments. orders ana DEGREES of
pmmissloners court would have been
II the county Judge had never
settled in Texas for nearly half a
I. 49, v rex; :; M ~ ,
= M res,,i ~ ~ ~ ouu,aNS Juige ue-
Vas n ,lI t val o!s,o eirs-
I'M rublicatIn, v,ot ~. II ga -,
ana The Ssoonn it.e7 49, ilu sui'',
manner 'nva!idate the first. AT
N, H.. n,,
w-pp,,v -. ;1;, - -, 49,
far n',,rder w. III, fih ], AZ n, conVlc-
~ w..R P',,tnsr; appealed fr9m, Navarro
sl,n ., a,sn d 10 'emanaed'
anti, , "as convicted on pnroly cir
f in'iSa evidence W and given thty-four
a. ae u,e p w ,sa
tte sH aSIuinl, feelings OF hostility
6 u.s ,sin,mosi,y asainst the deceased.
M nm TIC pr, n,wi'os'u 10 prove stlch
b.r. a am part o. Iwo suth persons;
B IS ., the proximity, on the day of
Plym Mls Of other persons whose
"a sns sGm,, It was the duty OF tho
!" ,t sam', every fact and circun-
IIh, Committed o1 NJ, the homicide, This
srs syery avenuo consis a mt w satSS
iI The testimony offered should II have awe
y sm l,.l
Is. = suthorizS the S ch SaS gwen Mvs not SS
= IL 70. sr asaIsrs" Ky. eiSr 19a & ns,o
barge on this subioet en as o riydN hy
s ~, would have been erroneous. II
y Of the s'i ho, ns hrot her, ,hal. on
IN Corsicapo ~, hurftiSrl "A