New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1896-12-15

PROCEEDINGS IN LOCAL COURTS.

PEOCEEDlNf * IN Lou al 'Ot IL .
David Guttr1an was arrested yesterday ny pepu-
tv-Sherin Wagering on an order signed by Justice
Conlan I'm the CITY ,'ourt in q suit brought aSana'
him II Mrs. Sarah Sirawtz. Of 40. - East Iw"n-
tich-si to recover s2.~,p damages fcr Islander Iht
pain,iff alleges that on December the defendant
for the purpose 0f impuSnlnr her character cat'u
her a vie name and this SANDER has caused her
TO lose tho consi i~ri,ton and esteem OF her hus-
tn Lu1Iow stree, Ian in default ~ $3.50 bail
Justice MacI.ean in an opinion handed down yes
,ordav In IN. Suproae Court denies the application
~ I,a.o Hume for y decree OF divorce from her
husband Harry J. Hume. real estate broker a.
No ~ BROADWAY. Mrs. Hume accused her h'is-
band OF maintaining improper relations Win
woman named Ada Eead. alleging that Inc "oih'"
paescd as her husbands sister. ana llV"d WIN h'"
IN several placcs I'm this city Justice Maclean Ii
his decision says: The conduct OF the cas-, with
tn, progressed antasonisins hui It,tor III
IS 10 the outcome. IN" iil''rC NM. -c,,
Is and by sgns in trial the failure 10 prou.c'
certain witnesses - account TOT the'
,nd crnes examination so sayoreG OF JOINT inter
rrsc TO proc are tn divorce rather IMAM I" ~. ~
70 the court IA controversy Involving iedr..s o, -,
,na grievance hat in ny ,pinion the prayer IL
the complaint should no dehi'l'
" ross.- counsel Tor the Pr1duce-s' Oh Com
many. o. Warren County. Penn asked Jusiic" rr""N'
:, the sunrerne Court. Yesterday for an order 10
onnej certain witnesses IL this city 10 answer qes-
lions put 20 them before an open cofnnsSio" III
sui, hrough. against the company by James j. 'at-
Ter Mr. Carter claims 20 De- me holder 90 me COM
trolling inieres IN 'he Producers company anu s's
,bs. M. 20 derived Of ,h" reh, OF voting his stock
n his suit he demands reinstatement, :, his rights
The company asserts mat he holds IN" STOCK 'oF the
Standard On Company. MS object beng - ilrn 'N'.
tie company 20 is giant rival y j. $50 .i t'i'
carter got his stock from tn" National Trans, ON.
many Il branch u. ~. Sta lard 'rl COMPANY. i,''
~ n nSr'e ony KIP T. k % IS T. Ti{ori Henry H.
Rogers and ! I'm bushnell No. are me 20. ''s
who ver, called witnesses brior" IN" commission
for The purpose 81 establishing hc CONNECTION De
many They refused 20 answer ne question: p1l I'd
,hern Joseph u ChJaie. who appeared 'or NJ. ar
icr. took the ground ~ ny a., ,.,e:eyen, and
imna'erial. Decision on III" motion vas reserved.
Counsel representing ,he Atorncy-Gcrcra4 asked
Justice Russell ~ The supreme Court. yesie'dhy ioi
an Injunction 90 restrain The Peoples Fire Ioyis In
surancc Company from irausaciing business J. wa-
understood .hai ne application In The naHr" Of
a test, the decision IN which would affect several
other Iloyds companies who IN the same position
as The defendants The Insurance Las passed In
MAY 1892 exempted by ~ provisions the compani"s
actually engaged n business before The passAsc ~
the law. !, coutenIed Boy the Atiorne, General
that =; tine OF ihe passage OF The a% SIX or eight
Lloyds companies were actually engaged IN business
and were thus exempt from re provisions but the
wear affer u number OF other il0yis companies
eDranz up unit. last year there about hum
d.eI companies who also claimed 20 DE exempt. al
into eTec; Joseph III. Choat" said. on bchal: ~ the
reopis % ;.i a., 1s sorph - ror,rsc,s o
he suspeniei I'm their operation The Insurance law
80 ,,essi IN Ma, sai1 Mr. 6h.aie and this rlr,-
the company organized IN anticipation Of the
passage Of the Insurance law bat nm act mat j. legal
al the time OF s perfOrmanc" does not become llcga.
simply because done IN anticipation ~ the ac
ton OF the LEGISLATURE Decision was reserved.