The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1896-05-13
THE COURT RECORD
Supreme Court.

1873. Wilson VS.. johnson. Gibson c. c.
Petition for renear1ng. Overruled Nc
estate, deeds Of conveyance. 90 be emit
tied to admission in evidence to establish
color of title must contain description
OF the land. -
1884 Boos VS. Morgan. Wabash c. c.
Affirmed. Jordan, il IL Is not a rever-
sible error for the trial court to overr1lo
when the facts therein averred can be Civ
which is also pleaded. 2. When It e at
ment into a bill of exceptions, under the
provisions of the code by means or the
be SO clearly identified that nothing re-
mains for the clerk 10 do but to cop9 &c
into the bill at the place indicated.
Affirmed Hackney, c. jim an action in
of the property having been made under
dence of the regularity Of the sale OF the
premises described In the deed, and pr1me
facie evidence OF a good title In fee simple
1905. Miller VS.. Burks. Park c. c. Az
firmed. Howard, 1.-THE bill OF exceptions
after being signed BY the Judge of; Of the TIA!
court, which filing must be shown to BE-
come a part Of the record
Appellate Court.
1725 State ex rel. Hall VS.. McGill. CLARK
was sold for taxes and deed was exc
cuted therefor the clerk OF the court II
not authorized by law to receive money
sale, and If he does so accept money to
be applied for such redemption Il u b.
color, Of his Office. and he is not in duty
bound TO pay IL TO his successor, but should
restore 1t to the person who paid IT.
IL there is not demand made for the
same by, the owner. 2. Money voluntarily
recovered back.
1916. Vermillion VS.. Mustard Madison c.
C. Affirmed. Davis. il Where the plain
.iff is entitled to recover for his services
the reasonable value thereof, and the an
swers Of the jury TO the interpretations dis
closes that their general verdict was aor
reasonable services, the general verdict
will control 2. II the answers 20 inteffog-
atories are inconsistent the general YER
dict controls the Judgment
1891. Manor VS.. Heffner. Delaware c. c.
Affirmed. Ross, jim an action 10 fore.
close a mechanics lien ana ma, II u, y an y, eco
tiff certain materials Chere naming theml,
and that they were delivered. TO be used.
BUILDING bull the complaint viii be sufiicient 10
show that the materials were furnished for
''i Isss. PRUDENTIAL Insurance Co. vs.. Jen-
kins. Madison c. c. Reversed. Gavin
c. J.-Where a person insures, for his own
benefit. the life of his infant nephew. 10
terest in the child.
Superior Court.
Room 1-Iohn L. McMaster. Judge.
Aetna Savings and Loan Association W
Mary T.. Lovett: foreclosure. Judgment foe
piaptiff for $1,000.
Lanes r.. Neum VS. James W. Speer: note.
Judgment for plaintiff for $s6-8.
William b. Prescott ct al. vs.. Theodore
p. Haughey ct al; account On trial by
jury.
Room 2-Lawson NJ. Harvey. Judge
John Metzler VS.. Lulu Lewis et al; fore
closure. Judgment against defendant for
5000 and costs: foreclosure and sale or
Charles Frank VS.. Dennis o'Brien: note.
judgment against defendant for GlsH ana
Conrad II. Shellhouse vs. Samuel J. Rice
ct al: mechanics .ien- Judgment against
defendant for 1854 and costs. foreclosure
ard sale ordered
A. b. Gates KS. Indianapolis Elevator Com
pany; damages. On trial by jury.
Room s-Pliny w. Bartholomew. Judge.
Anna Robinson VS.. Don A. Robinson: d.
yorce. Decree granted plaintin.
Leander A Fuimer VS.. Clara T. McCurdys
Improvement lien. Dismissed and costs
Romonia oo:itic Stone Company W. In
dianapolis Water Company: account o.
trial by jury.
New Suits Filed.
Denarcus Glen VS.. Sarah Finizter: dam
ages Circuit Court.
John D. Davis VS.. Rindo Davis: divorce.
Superior Court. Room 2
Mutual Home and Savings Association
mortgage. superior Court. Room ).
Jacob Ehrismsn w. Nay Ehrisman e o23
suit for partition. Circuit Court.