The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1896-03-17
THEY CANNOT AGREE
Mrs. Richard Fisher Applies for An
other Divorce.
HER UNIQUE COMPLAINT
She Wants Permanent Alimony
and All OF Her Children-Other
Family Unpieasantries
Matters In Courts.

Mrs. Jane Fisher, whose family trou-
bles have been before the public and in
the courts almost constantly for a year
or more, took a fresh start yesterday,
and brought suit for divorce against
her husband, Richard Fisher. A per-
son who is not entirely familiar with
her affairs might think there is some
thing wrong with her complaint, where
in she alleges that she was married to
the defendant on the oath of last jan
uary. and that there are four children,
the issue of the marriage. The fact is,
however, that the marriage was her
second tie-up with Richard Fisher from
whom she obtained a divorce on the
18th of last November.
About a year or so ago Mrs. Fisher
was sent to the asylum, and was dis
charged after serving a few months.
She then began suit for divorce on the
ground of cruelty and charged that she
had been sent to the asylum on false
testimony and misrepresentation. The
divorce went by default and she got her
decree and alimony allowance. A few
months later her ex-husband obtained
marriage license to marry his ex-wife,
but before he reached the house with
justice of the peace she had changed
her mind and the marriage was post
poned for a week or two, and then she
relented and the ceremony was per-
formed. Since then the Fisher family
troubles have been centred in two little
girls who are children by Mrs. Fishers
first husband, whom she ill-treated,
locked out of the house, publicly charg-
ed with immortality and wanted sent TO
the reform school. The woman's latest
trouble is with her husband, whom she
once more sues for divorce. She alleges
in her complaint that he has treated
her with extreme cruelty during their
short married life and that particularly
on the fst of the present month, at their
residence on North Jackson street, he
struck her in the side and threatened
| to do her great bodily harm. She says
he frequently threatened her with per-
| sonal injury so that she is in constant
danger of her life. She asks for the Gus
| tody of the four children, permanent al
| imony and counsel fees. William d.
Burbage is her attorney.
The deposition of Jesse Sample OF
| Fergus county was filed In the divorce
| case of May Sample against q. w. sam
| ple. He is the son of the parties to the
] suit, and testifies that the defendant
I deserted his wife in 1892, abused her,
SLAPPED her face, called her vile names,
/ ana is now living somewhere in Cho-
/ teau county. -,
against John Ward, the defendant filed
a motion to restrain the plaintiff from
| removing the children from the lurls-
! diction of the court, as she Is alleged
| to have threatened to do.
An answer was filed yesterday in the
libel and damage suit of Harry Adler
against Morris Meyer. The detendan'
/ denies that he called the plalntlH a
thief. but says he said that If he did
! not return certain goods or pay Tor
| them he was no better than one who
would steal, a statement that was JUS
titled by the circumstances, ana can De
proved. 1t is denied that Adler suffered
any damage.
against ]. H. Leyson, a suit for $1,000
alleged to have been promised her IN
consideration of a bill of sale for lot
of furniture in the Leyson block, an
answer was filed yesterday In which II
is denied that the defendant ever
agreed to pay her the sum stated Oh
any other sum, but alleges that the tull
consideration of the bill of sale was
the dismissal of a $1,000 attachment
suit he had against her. He did give
her 1880 extra as a gratuity ana Win
out any consideration, for the purpose
| of making a settlement AS counter
claim Mr. Leyson alleges that the bill
of sale was given in full settlement OF
his claim and she represented to him
that there was nothing owing on the
furniture, but after he had dismissed
the suit and accepted the settlement
he discovered that a furniture com
pany had a claim of 1926 on the furni-
ture and a music company had claim
of s41O on a piano, included in the bill
of SALE BY reason of her false anc
fraudulent representations he was
damaged in the sum of 1896, for which
amount he asks judgment.
Bartholomy Para yesterday com
menced a suit against Joseph RUSS
, for $29451, due on a note, and S1O55O
due on an assigned account. An at
tachment was issued.
Judge Mediation yesterday granted
an Injunction I'm the case of Silas +
, King against the Montana ore Pur
. chasing company on the plaintiff films
. a bond in the sum of $1,000.
Judge Speer yesterday sustained ;
demurrer TO the fnformations agalns
w. Gray, ]. johnson and Ma Chu
charged with gambling without a Ii
cense. The demurrer was sustained OF
the ground that the law could no
, reach the employees of a gambling
!, house The state will take an appea
to the supreme court. and pending
/, final decision, a similar case agains
=. Austin Byrd and others will not b