The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1896-03-20
THE SALT LAKE HERALD FRIDAY, MARCH 20, 1895

! the open foe and against the lnSOlehce
! of the public. servant who would eXalt
his party by debasing his country
While Pearson was referring to pro-
lection and its victories, Mr.. McCreary
| interposed to ask why he dld not re-
call the elections of 1892, when Cieve-
| land was reelected and the Mckinney
DILL condemned.
Because the elections of 1872 are
back numbers" replied Pearson. The
Dsmocra,ts elected in 1892 were over
whelmingly repudiated in 1894, ana the
protection victory of 1894 will be re-
peated this year
Mr.. Tucker Dem). OF Virginia, a
member of the foreign affairs commit
tee, was the first speaker today In OPP
| position to the adoption of the reso-
| luton.
A DELUSION-
Mr.. Tucker argued that the Repub-
licans were deluding themselves with
the idea that Mr.. Bayard's character
ization of the American people was
offensive. Personally, he was proud Of
the description of them as strong,
self-confident and often times violent
peOple-men who seek to have their
! own way" That was glorious deS-
cription of the history of the Anglo
SaXons as a people. He argued that
the American people were sometimes
violent He cited the strikes at Chi
cago and other places, the mob vio-
| lence at New Orleans, the calling out
| of the militia in Kentucky few days
ago.
Mr.. Tucker like Mr.. Dinsmore, re-
ferred to the Chandler interview charg-
| ing that the protected industries had
been levied on by the Mckinley agents,
and that those industries would own
| him and make merchandise of him, if
elected
In the light of that interview, he
asked, did not the words of Mr.. Bayard
| that protection corrupted public life"
fall as gratefully on the ears as the
sound of rain on the roof in time of
drought?
GREW. WARM.
Suppose all Mr.. Chandler says in
! the interview is true, which I deny
interrupted Mr.. Northway (Rep), of
| Ohio hotly, SIS that any reason why
Mr.. Bayard should denounce his coun-
trymen to a foreign audience?"
Il call Mr. Chandler" replied Mr.
Tucker, "as witness to prove my
case, and 1 know of no man better
versed in the inner workings of Re-
publican politics than William E.
| Chandler"
You call him on the theory that he
has turned states evidence, and that
there is no other evidence?"
There is ample evidence" responded
Mr.. Tucker, that the Republicans fry
the fat out of manufacturers with be-
coming regularity"
Have not the Democrats, during the
past three years. effectually fried the
fat out of the manufacturers and every
body else" asked Mr.. Mccall (Rep.).
of Massachusetts.
mot in the way you mean" replied
Mr.. Tucker
Mr.. Tucker argued that these resolu-
lions meant nothing The managers
of the house had decided on a
NOTHING POLICY
and sat around, more mischief still for
idle hands to do. He closed with
magnificent tribute to Mr. Bayard' 6
personal character.
After some brief remarks by Mr.. Nc
Call (Rsp., Mass9 in favor of the reso-
lutions, Mr. Barrett (Rep., Mass.), the
author of the original resolutions of
impeachment, took the floor
At the conclusion of Mr.. Barrettss
speech an agreement was effected for
taking vote at O'clock tomorrow.
After some. further remarks by Mr.
Cooper Dem-s tFla.) against the reso-
and Mr.. Gibson (Rep., TENN in favor
of them, Mr.. Sulzer Dem, n. W en-
livened the proceedings with some per
Sonal remarks about the valor of Re
publicanS who assaulted Thomas E.
Bayard when he was not present to
defend himself.
A CLINCHER
He devoted most of his time to Mr..
10 1aa re:,.
cular which, be, said, was sent out I'M
der Mr.. GibsonSs frank. describing his
qualities as a candidate and entitled,
Rally, Boys. Once Again. Send Glib
son Back to Congress and the Country
Is Savedr'
MIR. Gibson, with flushed and angry
face, jumped to his feet and shouted
out that a man who would make such
charge was a coward
II did not hear the gantleman's re-
mark" said Mr.. Sulzer, who declined to
yield, '.but l suggest that the next time
he addresses me he use trumpet"
Later, however, Mr.. Su,zer accepted
MI Gibsons disclaimer that the circu
lar referred to had not been sent out
under his frank. He had been so in
formed, however.
The statement is an Infamous false
hood" shouted Mr.. Gibson, land your
1nfOrmer originated d vie SidHueI, diu
you are no better than he is"
Il decline to yield said Mr. Sulzer.
Your tactics are those of the cow
ard" called out Mr.. Gibson above the
din and confusion.
when Mr.. Gibson returned home
and was asked, What did you do?' ne
would reply, We censured Bayard,
said Mr.. Sulzer.
GIBSON DENIES IT.
When Mr. Sulzer sat down Mr.. Glib
son got the floor and made a brief re-
ply. in which he denied that he had
RANKED the circular In fact. he said,
it was still in the hands of the printer.
Mr.. Suffers copy had been sto-en. 1t
was we'll known principle of law that
if there were no receivers there would
be no thieves Oaughter)
Mr. Sulzer, The said, had f1ourished
picture of him before the house. He
would in return give pen picture OF
Mr.. Sulzer He thereupon read, amid
howls of laughter, description of Mr.
Sulzer from the New York World,
which remarked on Mr.. Suffers resem.
blamce to Henry Clay, and spoke Oh
him as MIR. SedleitZ Powder
when the gentleman goes home 10
New York" said Mr.. Gibson, in conclu-
sion. land is asked what he has done.
hire 6