Hutchinson gazette. [volume] (Hutchinson, Kan.) 1895-1902, 1896-10-22

VA AOAi OSV IS'-VhF. Dryun nuu u
tremendous audience here Saturday.
The usual demonstrations of approval
were very marked and thousands were
turned from the hall where he spoke.
Among other things he said:
II would not favor the free coinage
OF silver did not believe it would be
beneficial to those who toll, because,
my friends, my political philosophy
teaches me that there can be no pros
.perity in this nation unless that pros
perity begins first among those who
create wealth and finds it's way after
wards to the other classes of society.
"My friends, when government is
properly administered there will be no
railroad wreckers to make themselves
rich by bankrupting those who put
their confidence in them; when gov
eminent is properly administered, there
will be no representative of coal
trust; sitting BY every fireside to ex-
act tribute from those who desire to be
protected from the cold of win ter;
If governments properly administered
there win be no syndicate fattening
out OF the governments Universities
after they have brought those adver-
stiles upon the government for their
own benefit; when government is pro-
perly administered, there will be no
corporations which assume greater au-
thority than the power which created
them; when government is properly
administered, it will recognize those
fundamental principles set forth in the
Declaration of Independence. 'All
men are created equal that they are
endowed with inalienable rights, that
governments instituted to preserve
these rights and that governments de-
rive their just powers from the con-
sent Of the governed
when these four principles are ap.
piled, then the government will be
what it ought to be.
jackson has we'll said that there
are no necessary evils in government,
that evils exist only in it's uses, and,
my friends, it is not government that
we raise our hands against. No man
who understands society, or the nee
essity for government, will ever raise
his hand against government. It's
against the abuse of government, and
we shall not be driven from our pur-
pose to eradicate these abuses, al
though every man entrenched behind
special privilege shall heap abuse
upon those whom he robs.
"We have made the money question
the paramount issue of this campaign
and yet our opponents are not satisfied
to meet this question openly. They
have never been satisfied to meet the
money question. The advocates of
the gold standard never fought an
open fight in all their lives, and never
will.
"You ask me why they don't? I will
tell you. Shakespeare explains it,
that it is conscience that makes cow
ards of men, and the conscience of the
advocates of the gold standard tells
him his policy enriches some, but is
curse to the great masses.
81 said the advocates of the gold
standard bad never fought an open
fight. repeat it. The advocates of
the gold standard are not fighting an
open fight in this campaign. Before
the republican convention did not you
heara great many people talk about the
impossibility of having two yardsticks.
Didn't you hear them talking about
gold being the only money for civilized
nationsP Didn't you hear them talk
about having outgrown silver? Didn't
you hear them talking about the mine
owners profit on free coinage, and the
demagogues who tried to curry favor
with the people by advocating free
coinage and the dishonest debtor who
wanted to pay his debts in cheap dol
lars? You heard all these. But when
the republican convention met and
they had a number sufficient to write a
platform did they put in there any
thing about two yardsticks? Did they
put in anything about the demagogue
who was advocating bimetallism?
Not at all. The republican platform
declared the gold standard
was not desirable thing; that repub-
lican platform expressly pledged the
party to get rid of the gold
standard and substitute the double
standard-when? When the leading
nations would help to do
it. But my friends, the very fact that
that platform pledges the republican
party to substitute the Gouble stand
ard for the gold standard Is positive
assertion that the double standard is
better than the single gold standard.
But the trouble is that, having de-
clared that bimetallism was better