San Antonio daily light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1886-1907, 1895-03-13
COURT NEWS.
Thirty SEVENTH DISTRICT COURT


Jennie Ellis VS.. Louis Ellis, divorce:
dismissal set aside and case reinstated
Emma Lewis VS.. Joseph Lewis. d.
vorce: dismissal set aside and case rein
stated.
Humbrairy VS.. F. Bachrach, suit on
account, appeal from Justice court; dis
missed at plaintiffs costs.
c. w. Woods VS.. Annie Woods, divorce !;
dismiss ed under rule for costs.
j. w. Frederick Kuehn VS.. l.. c. A.
knehn. div rec; judgment for plaintiff.
The following cases were dismissed for
want of prosecution:
John Keller VS.. T. c. Frost ct al, to
recover money sn deposit.
L. II. and John V Sommervilie, eXecu-
tors Of estate Of A. SOmmerville, deceased,
VS.. John K. Combs, executor of estate of
Phoebe A. Gamble, deceased, on prOmis-
sorry note.
Birdie Mcdaniel VS.. J. E. Mcdaniel,
divorce.
Baldwin S Moore ct al, VS.. James Fl.
McLeary, for trtition.
FORTY FIFTH DISTRICT COURT.
The case of John Louis Wipf against
Agatha Schmidt ct al, suit for partition
and rents, and the case Of John l.. Wipf
against Dan 81 Eleder ct al, suit for GER
tiorari, have b-an consolidated and are
now on trial before a jury in the Forty
fifth District court.
A case OF c. L. Frommer against the
johnson Bros. Printing company. suit fer
debt, was dismissed at defendants costs
this morning.
NEW SUITS FILED.
Mary McCarty VS.. William McCarty,
divorce. They were married Decem Der,
1889, and lived together about one year
Plaintiff alleges that McCarty had
cut her with a razor and had abandoned
OF ha
northwest corner Of South Centre and
Walnut streets and plaintiff asks that
McCarty be eniOined from interfering
with her in the use of same. Plaintiff
also UrayS aItmOny in the sum Of $50 a
month.
A. Baldwin & Co. VS.. Dan Sullivan &
Co; garniShment.
Thomas EuleS VS.. the Missouri, Kan
Sas & Texas Railway company; appeal
from Justices court.
Mary Borden Carter VS.. Charles g
BOehauwe: on prOmi 'SOry note and for
foreclosure of deed of rust.
l.. c. Courtney VS.. the Alamo Cold
Storage company, Ger. orari.
Leonard Cara VS.. Lewis Ulrich and
Ben Hammond, for RECESSION and cancel
latOn Of deed.
Mary Ann Doyle vs. J. and E. Lamm,
appeal from justice court.
Francisco G. Sanchez vs.. Ed. Sanchez,
were married in Laredo IN 1890 and that
slefendantwaS COnvisteI Of a felony in
Maverick county after the marriage and
imprisoned in the state penitentiary.
w. c Long vs.. the Galveston, Harris
burg and San Antonio Railway company,
damages of SlO,23O for personal injuries.
The petition sets forth tn It planutf was
riding on a train from Houston to San
Antonio. October /, 1894. aud that man
named Emmett Townsend. who was going
to Weimar on the same train, was per
mitten to walk through the cars in
beaSly intoxicated condition: thatTOwn-
send was carving loaded pistol, which
he careleSSly dropped on the floor. when it
discharged and the bullet entered the heel
of plaintiffs right foot and traverSed the
entire length of his foot. br- aking a num-
Der Of bones in the foot. The bullet, the
petition alleges, has never been found and
is still in his foot. He was lid up in the
Santa Rosa hospital for six weeks and is
still unable to move ab'ut without
crutcheS.
COURT NOTES.
William Davis ct al. have fled a suit
for injunction in the Thirty Seventh
District court last evening against u. e..
Clifford ct al, to restrain the after from
voting certain stock at meeting TO be
held next Saturday.
In the case of Z. G. EaSUn against John
p. eau pb>ll ct al, suit for damages, tried
by jury before Judge Newton yesterday.
a verdict assessing $500 actual and $500
exemplary damages against ) +. WileS,
of Hondo City, was brought in. The case
was dismissed as to Sheriff Campbell and
has SuretieS.
The county commissioners approved
number OF accounts and minor reports
this morning.
The county clerk issued a marriage IL
cenSe to Benjamin f. Fuchs and Anna
Mackensen last evening.