Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1895-01-10

bdnhS, Tex Jan. ~ viioMinb air
the proceedings had In the court OF
civil appeals, Fifth district, at Dallas:
Afirmed-J. j. Mathews ct al. VS..
j. ID. Boydston. Dallas county; Il. j.
Dickson VS.. $. II. Witten ct al, Dallas
county; e. j. Dickson VS.. @. w. Moore
ct al, Dallas county; Sloan s Con
zales VS.. Texas and Pacific Railway
company, Dallas county; Scarf a.
o'Connor Co. VS.. Tom Allen, Kaufman
county; b. NJ. Burgher VS.. j. g., Hem
derson, Delta county, S. NJ. Whitmore
VS.. j. p. II. Nelson, ELLIS county; u.
NJ. Tillman VS.. Blankenship a. Blake
Co, Dallas county.
Reversed and Remanded-St Louis
Southwestern Railway Co. VS.. ID. Il.
Rice, Smith county; c. NJ. Mckinney
VS.. ]. L. Rogers ct al. Bowie county;
j. A. ellis vs.. Borenberg, Flexner C
Mendall. Bowie county.
Reversed and Rendered-J. W. la
Pice ct al. VS.. l.. l.. Key ct al, Hill
county
In tho case of ]. 8. schofield ct al.
VS.. p. w. Douglass ct al. affirmed as
to all parties except interest OF j. $.
Schofleld in the land In controversy and
reversed and remanded as to him.
In case of Missouri, Kansas and
| Texas Railway Co. VS.. J. T.. Dawson,
from Hill county, submission set aside
and cause set for January 30; appellant
having filed brief on day before sub
| mission and 1t appearing that appellee
had no notice Of such filing.
Motions Disposed OFT. II. Rich
ardson VS.. Il. NJ. Lawrence, affirm on
certificate, oyerruled; Mccormick Har-
| vesting Machine Co. VS.. F. u. Muir
Gibson, rehearing, overruled; John p.
Cox ct al. VS.. j. w. Morrison, 10 re-
instate. granted upon condition that
appellants pay all cost accrued within
fifteen days; Lou II. White VS.. ]. II.
Cole, rehearlng, overruled Birdie Lynch
VS.. Southwestern Telegraph & Tel Co..
advance, overruled; c. F., Boehrnger
ct al. VS.. A. d. Richards Medical Co.,
rehearing. overruled; c. r. Boehringer
ct al. VS.. a. b. Richards Medical Co,
additional conclusions. granted; City
OF Sherman VS.. r. j.. Smith, affirm on
certificate, overruled and appellee
motion 10 file transcript granted and
allowed thirty days to file same and
taxed with all cost to date; Missouri
Kansas and Texas railway vs. V. II
Jones, file transcript granted; Johr
Johnson VS.. G. II. Clarkson. rchearing
overruled; j. w. Ia Pice ct al, VS.. w
7. Martin ct al, file transcript, grant
ed; Cassidy OIL Co. VS.. w. A. Dis
borough, file transcript, granted.
Cases Scientifically. e. Muse ct al
vs.. Il. d. CLANCY ct al, Fannin county
Hiram Morrison VS.. Barry. Ellison 4
Etherldge, Dallas county; City Of Dial
las VS.. w. p. Ellison, Dallas county
d. II. Wlller VS.. Bank of Daingerheld
Morris county; Walter A. Wood Reap
, ing and Moving Machine Co. VS., ]. Il
2 Edwards. Ellis county; st, Loui
1 Southwestern railway VS.. Riley Indy
r Hopkins county; City of Texarkana VS.
Martha Runnells, Bowie county; f. "
t Hail VS.. Bonham OIL and Cotton Go
Fannin county; Nathan Custer VS. j
! L. Whitesell. Bowie county; Il. II. vii
. nu11 81
]. B. Boon vs., VIM. Boon, Ellis county
3 A. Lloyd VS.. s. l.. Caps, Ellis county
O st. Louis and San Francisco railwa
c VS.. Il. D. Craig, Lamar county.
10 Motions Submitted-Schneider
3 Davis VS.. Mart McCoulsky, strike ou
d statement OF facts; w. o. Brown ct n
= vs.. Farmers and Mechanics Nationl
p bank, rehearng and additional cor
- illusions; A. w. Stearns VS.. II. g. Per
y ninan, rehearing; Gulf. Colorado an
a Santa Fe railway VS.. j. j. Waller, r.
a hearing; G.. B. Taylor vs.. j. w. Evan
:. ct al, rehearing; f. & O. Petri VS..
4, b. Robinson, affirm on certificate; NJ
y f. Scott VS.. estate of W. n. Scot
advance; Gulf, Colorado and Santa i
railway VS.. Wooten g. KimbrouBh. r.
! hearing and conclusions of fact an
q law; Kelly-Goodfellow Shoe Co. VS.. LII
erty Insurance Co, retaN certificate
John p. Cox VS.. W. il. trieste, fl
5 transcript.
u Cases Set for January &c. /
e Wright VS.. j. n. Hardee & Co., Dalli
e county; II. y. Birmingham w. w.
= Gum ct al, Lamar county; America
s Fire Insurance Co. VS.. First Natlon
bank, Hunt county; II. l.. BrenermH
c VS.. II. 4. Burk, Grnyson county; $.
e Freedman VS.. Lombard Investmel
It Co., Navarro county; NJ. Cohen vs..
/ D. Simpson. Navarro county; Gul
Colorado and Santa Fe railway V
= Z. b. Holder. Hunt county; s. ]. Hop
= well Va Jas Daniels. Hunt county;
i w, fields vs. Jennie Austin, GraysC
}. county, Texas and Pacific railway v
l j. f. Ford and wife, Harrison count
r Texas ard Pacific railway VS.. w.
q Grimes. Harrison county.