St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1895-02-27
IN THE AFTERNOON.
MIR. Hall Continues to Prod Young
Hayward.

AT the opening of the court in the
afternoon Harry Hayward was still
under .crosS-eXamination by Mr.. Hall.
@. You knew Miss Cling had box
in the deposit vaults? A. No, sir,
did not.
Q. When did you first get any in
formation that she had taken a box2
A. At the time she got the money she
told me she was going to get vault.
Q. Did she not come back? A. Not
after she had taken the money away.
Q. Did she come back on the 9th
of November and tell you she had got
vault? A. 1 don't think she did.
She has been in the Office a number O.:
times, and it is impossible for me to
recollecet every time she came in.
Q. Did you not tell her to put this
money in the vault? A. No, 1 did not.
Q. Did she not tell you she would?
A. No.
Q. Did you not on the morning after
the homicide, Dec. 4, state in the pres
ence Of the mayor and Mr.. Hitchcock,
the stenographer, describing the oc-
currence of Nov. "a, say that she told
you she was going to the loan and
trust vault to put the money in there"
A. No, 1 did not.
@. You knew she had a box? A.
am not certain.
@. In this statement did you not say
that she had a box? A. If that is the
stenographer's report I suppose! it
must be right.
@. Is it not a fact that before she
went out you knew she was going ever
to the vaults? A. I thought she hads
Q. What did she come back to YOU
and report for? A. 1 don't believe
she did 40
Q. You were asked to state at that
time what occurred, and you said that
she did return the second time? a.
1t is very evident that at that time it
was my idea, but on thinking it over L
must have made a mistake.
Q. Is it not true that Blixt'sg ac-
count is correct? A. No, it is not. <
@. Were you telling the truth when
you gave the statement to the mayor
or now? A 1 wanted to tell the truth
on both occasions. sp.-A 81
@. Did you use the language have
just read? A. [ think so.
@. Can you give any reason for her
coming back? A Ii L knew for a
fact that she came back 1 would say
so.
Q. Can you tell us what she came
back for? A. 1 think she came back
to get the money.
@. Did you not say that she came
back to say that she had put the
money in the vault? A. She told me
some time that she had put it in the
box.
@. Did she tell you anything else
about it? A. 1 have no recollection
what else she said that day.
O. Are you telling the truth now or
when you made the first statement?
A. I was not aiming at telling lie
then.
O. You have no explanation for why
she came back? A. No, L have not.
O. When did you get suspicious?
A. I did not get suspicious till L got
those letters.
O. Did it make you suspicious when
YOU knew the money was not in the
vault? A. 1 had a suspicion then.
@. According to your story, you
loaned her $780, and did you not get
suspicious then when you knew it was
not III the vault! ~ IAAOUoiA| N-Ao
$1,000 was in the vault.
Q. Did you not talk with her at the
time of making the $500 loan? A.
think [ did.
@. Did she do anything more than
sign the notes before Biixt came in!
A. No, she had not signed the notes
then.
@. Were these assignments written
then? A. No.
@. Now, the numbers in these as
signments were written in subsequent?
A. Possibly.
Q. How many ink bottles were there
on your fathers desk and Adry's? A.
On Adry's there was one, and on
fathers seven or eight.
@. You wrote these assignments on
Adry's desk? A. No, did not. 1 be-
lieve both these assignments were
made out before the oath of November,
and 1 believe she signed the notes
when the assignments We're not there.
@. Is it not a fact that the ink on
the first two notes is the same? A. 1t
looks like it. q
@. Is not the ink with which the
$1,000 note is signed the same ink as
that which it is written throughout?
A. I think it is. e,
@. Did you not say these notes were
signed together? A. I said that one
was signed in the room where we were,
and the other in the room where she
went to count the money. 81
@. Is it not true that the ink OF
the body of the three notes is the
same ink? A. It looks like it. ri
Q. You say you paid one of the
notes to her in Barge's restaurant?
A. Yes.
Q. This was at the time you were
pawning your jewelry and some of
hers, and yet you loaned her the 81,
coo? A. 1 never pawned her ring TO
make up this amount.
Q. When did you first become sus-
picious? A. I think the inkling Of
it was in the restaurant when she
had the $1,000.
Q. Did you ask her whose money
it was in the restaurant? A. Yes,
but she would not tell me.
Q. You next went to Waterman to
ascertain what she had done with
the money? A. On the Sunday after
that I did
y. You met her on the Friday even
ing near Fifth avenue north? A. No,
1 did not.
Q. Where did you meet her that
evening? J.. If met her at all, it was
in the fat
Q. Who was there? A. I can't say.
The chances are Miss Ireland was
@. Now be positive. A. 1 can't be
positive.
@. What was the subject of the
conversation that time? A. don't
remember ithe words, but, if Miss
Ireland was not there, 1 have an idea
what it was; if Miss Ireland was there,