davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Independent. [volume] (Honolulu, H.I.) 1895-1895, 1895-05-06
Peerless.

A few days ago a company was
formed in this city who purchas
ed from G. j. Wagner the whole
and exclusive rights for the
Hawaiian Islands to manufacture
and use the Peerless Preserving
Paint. There have been num-
berless attempts to produce an
article which would preserve
and at the same time protect the
various roofs over buildings on
these islands all of which have
met with more or less success,
but each possessing some weak
ness in point or quality which
has rendered it practically use
less in carrying out the purpose
for which it was intended. Lit
had been left with Mr.. Wagner
to place upon the Hawaiian Mar.
ket paint which by experiment
and in actual use during the past
few years has fulfilled every re-
quirement and the Paint is guar
anteed not to scale. crack, or-run
it being possessed of a body when
applied in which there is no oil
spirits or evaporatiye substance.
The main features which the new
company offers for its use upon
roofs and its NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS.
to any action of hot or salty
atmosphere and it's wonderful
preserving qualities which fully
prevent any rust or decay, besides
being a preventative from the
ravages of pests. The Peerless
Preserving Co., are prepared to
send skilled workmen for the
purpose of applying the paint
and every contract taken by the
company is fully guaranteed.
The prices for this work includ-
ing labor and material ire very
moderate considering that the
guarantee is against leaks, etc. /,
for period estimated upon the
age and condition of the roofs
when the work is performed.
The Peerless Preserving 90. +,
will on application at their office,
81 King Street, examine your
roof and give estimates free OF
charge, also on bridges, ports,
etc. 1t Oily.
The Independent. [volume] (Honolulu, H.I.) 1895-1895, 1895-05-06
MIXED JURY.

j. /. Dowsett vs.. Matfkeala ct al.
Ejecment, @ Brown for plaintiff,
@ w Ashford for defendants.
Jessie 7. Naone VS.. l.. A. And
rews, case. V: V. Ashford for
plaintiff; defendant in person.
j.. r. Holt, Jr. VS.. G. Lycurgus
ct al. assumpsit, O. w. Ashford
for plaintiff, Ne mann for defend
ants.
Pipi VS.. l.. l.. McCandless. Road
controversy in Eva, Oahu. Appeal
from commissioner. Davidson for
plaintiff, Garter & Kinney for
defendant-appellant.
VIM. Mossman VS.. Kalimahau-
ma, Replevln. Poepoo for plaintiff
appellant; Castle for defendant.
NAH alias Keaweamahi vs.. Rev,
Gulstan etal. Ejectment. Achi Tor
plaintiff. Hatch for defendants.
r.. w. Holt vs.. Chang Fat.
Ejectment. Rosa for plaintiff
Magoon for defendant. F
i Mele Uli ct al. vs.. Thomas
Emmsley. Ejectment. Kaulis :
johnson for plaintiff, V V. Ash
ford for defendants. 8
Wailuu Kekaula vs.. V. V. Ash
ford. Assumpsit. G. Brown for
plaintiff defendant in person.
The Independent. [volume] (Honolulu, H.I.) 1895-1895, 1895-05-06
HAWAIIAN JURY-ClvIL

Clio TT. Newton Ell al. vs.. S.
Kaale ct al. Ejectmont. Kinney
for plaintiffs. Achi for .defen-
dants.
Annie L. Ulukou VS.. Kapiolani.
Assumpsit. Castle-Ashford for
plaintiff. Hatch for defendant.
Kaaukai Kelley vs.. Caroline
Aniu. Trespass. @. w. Ashford
Kaulia for plaintiff. Achi for de-
PENDANT.
Lipine Fern VS. w. q. Achi.
Damage. Neumann for plaintiff
Defendant in person.
Kailikea Waianuhea VS. Kaho-
okaamoku e. al. Eiectment. Ka-
hookano for plaintiff. Kane-Achi
for defendants.
Kamukoa VS. j. R. Holt Jr.
Replevin. Appeal from Waianao
Dis Court. Kaulia for plaintiff
appellent Carter & Kinney for
defendant.
The Independent. [volume] (Honolulu, H.I.) 1895-1895, 1895-05-06

Honolulu District Court, Rosa for
plaintiff-appellant,
James Kuhia vs.. Honomu Sugar
Co. Assumpsit, Appeal from Ho-
nolulu District Court, Magoon for
plaintif-sppellant, Kinney for
defendant
s w Pika VS. Kali, Assumpsit,
Appeal from Honolulu District
Court, johnson for plaintiff-appel-
liant, Kshookano for defendant
Gaspar Sylvia VS. Malta Kaia ct
al; Ejectment, Hartwell-Perry for
plaintiff, @ w Ashford for defend
ants
Jas b Castle VS. d Lokana ct al,
Assumpsit, Castle for plaintiff,
Achi- Poepoe for defendants
II W Holt VS. Goo Kim, Eject
ment, Rosa for plaintiff. Castle
for defendant
Poomaikelani vs.. Solomon Ma
helona. Assumpsit. Appeal from
Honolulu District Court. Achi
for plaintiff. S. w. Mahelona for
defendant appellant.
j. Tinker vs. VIM. Maxwell ct
al. Assumpsit. Appeal from Ho-
nolulu District Court. Plaintiff IN
person. Achi for defendant
appellant.
l.. p. Puuweuweu VS.. d. Kelii.
Replevin. Appeal from Koolaupo-
ko District Court. Castle for
defendant appellant.
DIVORCE AND SEPARATION.
Kahinu (w) VS.. Kalepe. Rosa
for plaintiff. 9. Brown for
defendant.
Anna Luddecke VS.. w. Lud-
decke. Kaulukou for plaintiff.
VIM. 9, Achi VS.. Isabella A.
Achi. Poepoe for plaintiff. v. V.
Ashford for defendant.
s. Maluna VS.. Mary Kina.
Poepoe for plaintiff.
Kinolua VS.. Mileka Kauha (w.)
Magoon for plaintiff,
August Book vs.. Balbini Book
Kaulukou for plaintiff.
Ahsun All Fook .(w) VS.. l.. All
Fook. @. w. Ashford for plaintiff.
Esther X. Mahaulu va. A. s.
Mahaulu. @. w. Ashford for
plaintiff.
Ida e Hilder VS.. Frank Ililder.
Magoon for plaintiff.
Julia X. Keliikulanakila VS..
Keliikulanakila. Hatch for
plalnti1f.
Maria J. Ferreira VS.. Domingos
Ferreira. Magoon for plaintiff
Nancy K. Ryan VS.. Alfred P,
Ryan. c. Brown for plaintiff.
John Kewalo VS.. Lokalia
Nakupa. Kaneakua for plaintiff
Mary Burn VS.. James Edwin
Burn Carter&Kinney for plaintiff
Kalama Kuhia vs.. Kemilia
Kuhia. Smith for pla intiff.
Louisa Esser VS.. Aug. Esser
Kaulukou for plaintiff.
The Independent. [volume] (Honolulu, H.I.) 1895-1895, 1895-05-06
Long
Branch
BE7NlNG~
establishment.

This FirstClass Bathing Resort
has been enlarged and is now open
TO the public, 1t is the best place
on the islands to enjoy Bath, and
there is no better place to lay off.
Special accommodations for La
dies. Tramcars pass the door every
half hour, and on Saturdays and
Sundays every fifteen minutes.
G. J. SHERWOOD,
Proprietor.
The Independent. [volume] (Honolulu, H.I.) 1895-1895, 1895-05-06
COURT CALENDAR
List Of Cases for the May
Juay Term Circuit of
the Court.
HAWAIIAN JURY, CRIMINAL

SN<N W ANAhA' " " ~ Il Olbi LIN n ~.
Republic Of Hawaii VS., j. e.
Bush and j. Nawahi. Conspi-
racy, Castle for defendants.
Republic of Hawaii VS.. George
Nalina, prejury 2nd-cegree.
Republic of Hawaii VS.. @. Nit
,chell, burglary, Kaulukou for de-
PENDANT.
Republic Of Hawaii VS.. Patrick
Cullen. Murder. @ Brown
Kinney to assist prosecution,
Magoon for defendant.
Republic of. Hawaii VS. Kaha-
kauila Ct al. Adultery. Appeal
from Honolulu District Court.
Achi for defendants.
Republic of Hawaii vs. Kualii
ct al. Adultery. Appeal from
Waialua District Court. Kane for
defendants.
Republic of Hawaii VS. Hailama
Assault with deadly weapon. APP.
peal from Honolulu District Court.
Achi for defendant. s4At
Republic Of Hawaii VS. Keliika,
laea and two others. Larceny Sd
degree. Appeal from Koolaupokc
District Court.
Republic of Hawaii vs. Ka niku
Assault with dangerous weapon
@. Brown-Kane for defendant
Republic of Hawaii VS.. Johr
Hapa. Robbery. Carter e. Kinney
for defendant
Republic of Hawaii VS. William
Fish. Failure to carry lights
Appeal from Waianae Distric
Court. Kaulukou for defendant
Republic of Hawaii VS. Kumu
koa. Malicious injury. Appea
from Waianae District Court
Republic of Hawaii VS. H. Ke-
aweamahi. Housebreaking. Kane
for defendant
Republic of Hawaii vs ]. X
Nakookoo. Malicious burning
I'd degree. Kane-Poepoo for de
fendant.
Republic of Hawaii VS.. +. j
Tesla, Assault on public officer
Appeal from Honolulu Distric
Court. Kaulia for defendant,
appellant.
The Independent. [volume] (Honolulu, H.I.) 1895-1895, 1895-05-06

/ 49, H@0@AbAs' %ANsOhAND
General for defendant.
Il. Harrison VS.. Republic of
Hawaii. Damage. Neuman for
plaintiff. Attorney-G General for
defendant.
f. Harrison ct al. VS.. Republic
OF Hawaii. Damage. Neuman for
plaintiff. Attorney General for
defendant.
Il. Harrison ct al. VS.. j. III.
Bruins. Assumpsit. Neuman for
plaintiff. Hatch fer defendant.
M. Davis VS.. California Wine
Co. Damage. Appeal from Ho-
nolulu District Court. Foster for
plaintiff.
Y. All In VS.. Chun See Cheong.
Assumpsit. Appeal from Homo
lulu District Court. Castle for
plaintiff. G. w. Ashford for de-
fendant-appellant..
Chin Wo Company VS.. Chun
See Cheong. Assumpsit. Appeal
from Honolulu District Court.
Castle for plaintiff. G. w. Ash
ford for defendant appellant.
j. Tinker VS.. E., Norrie ct al /.
Assumpsit. Appeal from Honolulu
District Court. Plaintiff in person
Rosa for defendant appellant.
Peter High vs.. Charles Wall.
Assnmpsit. Hartwell for plaintiff
Hatch for defendant.
@. Meineck VS.. r. Oliver ct al.
Assumpsit. Carter for plaintiff.
Antoine G.. Serrao VS.. j. G
Serrao. Damage. Castle for plain
tiff. V. V. Ashford for defendant
| l.. ID. Kerr VS.. Akana. Assumpsit
Magoon for plaintiff.
j. o. Carter, Admr., VS.. The
Mutual Life Insurance Go.
Assumpsit. Carter & Kinney for
plaintiff.
James j. Byrne VS. j..
Allen et al. .Assumpsit. Hart
well for plaintiff. Hatch for de-
PENDANTS.
James j. Byrne vs. John Martin
ct al. Assumpsit. Hartwell for
plaintiff. Hatch for defendant.
All See VS. Quong Fong Wal Go.
Water controversy in Koohuloa,
Appeal from Commissioner of
Water Rights. Hartwell for de-
PENDANT appellant.
Edna G.. Trousseau VS.. B.
Cartwright ct al. Assumpsit.
Hartwell for plaintiff. Hatch for
defendan.
c. Sanoorn Ell al. VS. A. Feek
ct al. ASS nmpsit. Neuman for
plaintiffs. Hatch for defendants
Ell. A. Widemann vs. E. B.
Thomas. Replevin. Carter &
Kinney for plaintiff.
d. Dayton, Admr. VS. A.
Dreier. Trover. Garter & Kinney
for plaintiff. Neumann for de-
PENDANT.
: f. w. McChesney, Assignee
vs.. Antoine Lopez. Assumpsit.
Hartwell for plaintiff.
JURY WAIVED.
William Kauahi VS.. All Chew.
Tresspass. Appeal from Honolulu
District Court. Kaulukou fol
plaintiff. Foster for defendan'
appellant.
j. A. Magoon VS.. Yee King
Tong. Ejectment. Plaintiff il
person. Davidson for defendan
appellant.
w. r.. Castle VS.. Loo Chit San
ct al. Assumpsit. Appeal from
Honolulu District Court
Plaintiff in person. Davidson TO-
defendants,oppellant.
w. r.. Castle VS.. Loo Chit San
3 ct al, Assumpsit. Appeal from
D Honolulu District Court. Plaintiff
i in person. Davidson for defen-
: dants appellant.
w. II. Castle VS.. Loo Chit San
t ct al. Assumpsit. Appeal from
Honolulu District Court. Plaintiff
: in person. Davidson for defen-
. dants appellant.
, w. r. Castle VS.. Loo Chit San
al. Assumpsit. Appeal from
The Independent. [volume] (Honolulu, H.I.) 1895-1895, 1895-05-06


ans ct al. Replevin. Carter 4 Kin
ney for plaintiff.
r. r. Hind VS.. John Spencer ct
al Assumpsit, w. r. Castle for
plaintiff
Joe Morrie ct al. VS.. Lee Heu.
Ejectment. Achi-Johnson for plain
tiffs.
w. r. Opfergelt ct al. vs. Mary
Naone Stevens ct al. Damage.
Hatch for plaintiffs.
Kapuakela VS.. !. d. Iaea ct al.
Ejectmeht. Carter & Kinney for
plaintiffs, Achi for defendants.
G. s. Desky VS.. l.. K. Kamaka-
ia ct al. Assumpsit. Appeal from
Honolulu District Court. Edings
for plaintiffs, Magoon for defend
ants-appellant.
zap Kong vs.. Kaauana. Da-
mage. Appeal from Honolulu Dis
trict Court. Kaulia for plaintiffs
appellant, Kane for defendant.
FOREIGN JURY--CR1MINAL.
Republic of Hawaii vs. Tuck
Chez. Extortion. Appeal from &c
MOULIN District Court. Neumann fol
defendants.
Republic of Hawaii VS.. Jose Pc
reira. Larceny 3D. degree. Ap.
peal from Honolulu ID strict Court
Kaulukou for defendant.
Republic Of Hawaii VS.. Ino WV
DESERVING husband. Appeal from
Honolulu District Court. Kaulu-
kou for defendant.
Republic ofHawaiivs. All Nun
Possession of opium. Appea
from Honolulu District Court
Achi for defendant.
Republic of Hawaii vs.. Bentc
Jgnacio. Assault and battery
Appeal from Honolulu Districr
Court. Kaheaku a for defendant
Republic of Hawaii vs.. Frank
Gouveia. Larceny Sd degree. APP
peal from Honolulu Distric
Gouat, Kaneakua for defendants
Republic of Hawaii VS.. lie,
'Quai Tong alias All Tung. Posses
sion of opium. Appeal from Ew'
District Court. Foster for de-
PENDANT.
Republic Of Hawaii VS.. III. Nor
ton and +. Taves. Cruelty to ami
mails. Appeal from Honolulu,
District Court. Neumann TO
defendants. a gc6
Republic of Hawaii VS.. E Nor
rie. Solutions libel. Appeal from
Honolulu District Court. Men
mann for defendants.
Republic of Hawaii VS.. Higgins
Possession of opium. Appea
from Honolulu District Court
Kaulukou for defendants.
Republic Of Hawaii vs.. All Pack
Possession of opium. Appea
from Honolulu District Court
Foster for defendants. Conspirae,
Ashford Creighton for defendant
Republic of Hawsii VS.. G.. Sum
mers. Burglary. Kaulukou 10
defendants.
Republic of Hawaii VS.. Harad
Matzukami and Ito. Maliciou
injury.
Republic of Hawaii VS.. Choni
Kin and two others. Violating
Section /, Act Fl. Prov. Gov
Laws. Appeal from Honolul-
District Court.
Republic Of Hawaii VS.. Captain
Hill. Barratry.
Republic of Hawaii vs.. A. Her
manson. Manslaughter. Stanle
for defendants.
Republic of Hawaii VS.. Lo
Ting. Mayhem. Achi to assis
prosecution. Kaulukou for de
fendant.
Republic of Hawaii VS.. Lin
Tai, Assault with intent t
ravish. Kaulukou for defenda n
Republic of Hawaii vs.. Joe Dias
Liquor selling without license
Appeal from Waialua Distric
Court.
Republic ofHawaii vs.. Hoshina
Assault and battery. Appeal froI
Honolulu District Court. Castl
for defendant.
The Independent. [volume] (Honolulu, H.I.) 1895-1895, 1895-05-06
FOREIGN JURY-CIvIL.

.....INI.I b. .tlI. Uf.
Thos. Mott VS.. G.. r. Gulick,
guardian. Assumpsit, @. w.
Ashford for plaintiff. Kinney for
defendant. W asH6
III. n. Macfarlane VS.. Ira A..
Lowell. Assumsit. Garter & Kin
iney for plaintiff. Hatch for de-
ifendant. ss.l
Chas. Scharf VS.. Hawaiian Gov
ernment. Damage Castle Ash
ford for plaintiff. Attorney-Gen-
eral for defendant. Kinney OF
Counsel for defendant.
Pablo Artime vs.. Hawaiian
Government. Assumpsit. @. W..
The Independent. [volume] (Honolulu, H.I.) 1895-1895, 1895-05-06
Honolulu Carriage Mandatory
ssa IN sHH
w. W. WRIGHT, PnopRIEroR,
Successor to q. West).

[ CARRIAGE BUILDING AND REPAIRING.
". All Orders from the Other Islands In the
Carriage Building, Trimming and Painting
Line win Meet with Prompt Attention.
Blacksmithing in All Its Various Branches
Done. P. o. Box 1921. Nos. I9S and 1870
Fort Street.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1895-01-08
THE OMAHA woMAN,s CLUB.
Tt Is Ending the Century In 8 Blaze OF
Intellectual Glory.

Tt Is Ending the Century In g Blaze OF
Intellectual Glory.
Touching life with upward impulse
is the motto of the Omaha Woman's
club, one Of the most wide awake, pro-
gressive and well attended organiza-
tions of women in the United States.
It was founded in May, 1898, and az
the end of u year over $50 bright and
brainy Omaha women had become men,
bers and were preparing to end the CEN
fury in a blaze of intellectual glory.
There are now 40 memb ers, and as ap-
plications ara constantly pouring in the
500 mark will doubtless be passed be-
fore the second anniversary of the or
ganization is celebrated in May, 1895.
The educational work Of the club is con-
Quoted by departments, to at least one
of which every member must belong.
Each department chooses its chairman
and has weekly or bimonthly meetings.
The general meetings of the club are
held every two weeks, and the literary
programme of the session is carried out
by some department designated for the
purpose.
The present officers of the club are
the following named: Frances NJ. Ford,
president; Elizabeth J. Lindsey, first
vice president; Jennie E. Keysor, Sec
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1895-01-08

ond vice president; Adelaide W. Cross,
recording seer etary; Harriet 81. Heller,
corresponding secretary; Ida Fleming,
treasurer.
Among tbs departments covered are
history, applied economics, philosophy
and science, parliamentary practice, po-
litical economy and social science, cur
rent topics, art, English literature, Ger
man literature, psychology, education,
music and domestic science.
President Ford was formerly a resi-
dent Of Orange. n. j., and is now one
of the leaders of culture and intelligence
in Omaha. She is also president of the
Omaha Woman's Christian association
and a musician of rare attachments.
Among the other prominent women
identified with the club are Mrs. J. W.
Savage, ex-president of the organization
and widow Of Judge Savage; Eliza W.
Peattie, novelist and newspaper wom-
an; Anna L. P. Duryea, wife of Rev.
DR.. Joseph T. Duryea; Mary Garard
Andrews, a Universalist minister; Free
da NJ. Lankton, leading Omaha physi
clan; Julia NJ G. Hooker, a local drug
gist; Grace B. Sudeborough, principal
of the Teachers Training school, and
DR.. Augusta J. Chaplin, pastor of the
First Universalist church The club is
taking a strong interest in the moral
and educational affairs of Omaha, and
one department is waging warfare
against the disorderly houses Of the city.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1895-01-08

Ross1GNo11 IN srDANEsF Ii was captured
COSTUME. about the time
that Chinese Gordon, then gov ernor gen.
eral of the equator under the khedive
Of Egypt, wen5 to Khartum alone after
the destruction of Hicks army by the
mahdi's forces and assumed command
of the Egyptian army. Although Cor
don saw death staring him in the face,
he concluded to hold Khartum to the
bitter end aud did so. After a siege of
317 days, and when an English army
was almost at hand, the mahdi's forces
carried the city by assault on Jan. 26,
1885, and some 4, 600 people. including
Gordon himself, were massacred.
Father Rossignoh was taken to Om-
durham by the mahdists and made a
slave After years of drudgery and
cruel treatment Major F. R. Wingate Of
the British army learned of his where
abouts and sent Abdulla to assist him to
escape from the hostile mahdists. Major
Wingate is famous for this sort of hui
name work. In 1892 he effected the es-
cape of three other captives, two nuns
and Father Ohrwalder. He is an Arabic
scholar and usually has little difficulty
in finding a native who for a consid-
Grafton will attempt the rescue of a
mahdist captive A different guide
must be employed each time, for once
he has effected the escape of a prisoner
he would forfeit his life if he returned
to the Sudan. The fate of several other
Europeans who were captured before
and after the fall of Khartum has new
er been learned, and they are doubtless
stiH held as slaves by the mahdists.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1895-01-08
FIVE CENTS A LINE,
SITUATIONS wANTED-FREE,

Are you In need of work? If SO. you are p
liberty to use these columns for assistance "
that direction. While this notice appears the
STATE JOURNAL will publish free on saturday,
Monday and Tuesday, for Topeka or Kansas
people, all notices of Situations Wanted, nos
exceeding Ave lines, or thlrty-nVe words n
this nature are handed in previous 70
ten O'Clock Saturday morning; also on Wednas:
thss class handed in by ten o'clock Wednesday
morning.
No advertisements Of this nature to be started
except on Saturdays and Wednesdays. No OBJ
legation is incurred on the part of the advertis:
eF. No worthy and needy man OF woman need
hesitate to take advantage of this offer. No one
IN business or having employment is expected %
take advantage of it. but al others invited 70
avail themselves freely.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1895-01-08
Ordinance No. 1898.

AN ORDINANCE to appropriate money out of
the General Revenue fund. the Fire Depart
ment Fund, General improvement Fund,
Judgment Fund.- Topeka Avenue Paving
Fund Sidewalk Fund, Retaining Fund, (Sew-
erS IL and 12) Sewer District No. IL Fund and
Sewe1 DiStric No. II Bond Fund, lin bondS),
and Metropolitan Police Fund.
Be it Ordained by the Mayor and Councimen of
the City of Topeka:
SECTION 1. That the sum of six thousand
thirty seven and 49-1OO dollars be and the same
is hereby appropriated out of the General Rev
enue Fund. Fire Department Fund, General
improvement Fund. Judgment Fund, Topeka
AvenuePavingFund, Sidewalk Fund. Retaining
Fund, (Sewers IL and 12). Sewer District No. II
Fund, Sewer District No IL Bond Fund On bonds)
to pay payrolls and claims against the city Of
Topeka as follows. to-wit:
Metropolitan Police fund. .............. ST ,6S3 Al
General Revenue fund. ............. $50 rs
Fire Department fund. 946 o.
General Improvements fund ............ 1909 OF
judgement Fund Observation-Disclosures. $50 90
Topeka Avenue Paving Fund. 80 80
Sidewalk Fund. Observation-Disclosures. II 80
Retaining Fund, (Sewers IL and 12) II
Sewer District No. II fund ........-.. 13I 90
Sewer district No IL Bond Funds lin $780,
bonds) -. -. :. ... 49,. 500 90
So O37 40
SEC. Q. This ordinance shall take effect and
be in force from and after its publication in the
official paper of the city of Topeka.
Passed the council January 7rh 1895.
Approved January 8th, 1896
7. W. HARRISON, Mayor.
IsEAL.l Attest: S. S. McFADDEN. City Clerk.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1895-01-08

Second Ward.
All south of the Kansas river, east of Kansas
avenue and north of Eighth street, except Nets
ker'S third addition.
FIRST PRECINCT.
East of Kansas avenue, west of alley between
Monroe and Madison and north of Fourth
street.
SECOND PRECINCT.
East of alley between Monroe and Madison
streets, west of Washington street, and north of
Fourth street.
THIRD PRECINCT.
East of Washington street and north of
Fourth street.
FOURTH PRECINCT.
South of Fourth street, east of Washington
street. and north of Eighth avenue. except Nets
kers third addition.
FIFTH PRECINCT.
South of Fourth street. west of Washington
street. north of Eighth street, and east of Kan
SaS avenue.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1895-01-08
ORTLAND'S CHEAP TEXAS
EXCURSIONS.

Ortland's next Texas excursion leaves
Topeka via Santa Fe route. January 10.
Low round trip rates have been recured
for Alvin, Eagle Lake, Matagorda, coun-
ty, and all points in Texas. Stop over
privileges.
Cali on or address A T. & S. F.agents
or CHAs ORTLAND,
immigration Agent,
Topeka. Kans
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1895-01-08
All In the Dark.

In that night in which we all are the
wise men crouch near the wall. It is
only the ignorant who sit placidly in the
middle of the room.-Le Jardin d'Epi-
cure, Anatoie Fernce.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1895-01-08

the mahdl IN the
Sudan ten years
ago. recently es-
capped from the
fierce dervishes
who held him
captive so long
and is now in
safety. He was
guided from Om-
durham by Alb
dulla Mohammed
Omar of the Aba
da tribe and trav-
eled for months
through the des-
erts in daily fear
of recapture and
death before he
reached Cairo.
Father Rossigno-
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1895-01-08
Oar zoo Rnftlaa

Shows Pine Expectorant sold in Tope-
ka last year, and not one bottle returned
on account of failure to cure. Why not
try it for your cough and cold.
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1895-01-08
OFFICIAL NOTICE.
OFFICE OF
COMMISSIONERS OF ELECTIONS,
TOPEKA, Kan, Jan. 2, 1895.

I. Frank Herald, Commissioner of Elections
of the city of Topeka, Shawnee county. Kansas
do hereby in conformity to section three, OF an
act of the legislature entitled, An act to pro-
vide for and to regulate the registration of vot-
ers; to regulate elections, and to provide for the
appointment of Commissioner of Elections in
cities of the first class. approved March INC,
1882 do proclaim and declare that the bound
aries of all the wards as made by the council
thereof, and the division of said wards into
precincts as made by the Board of Supervisors
of Elections, are follows. tO-wit:
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1895-01-08

First published January 2. 1895, in the To
peka State Journal
The Topeka state journal. [volume] (Topeka, Kansas) 1892-1980, 1895-01-08
First Ward.

First Ward.
All north of the Kansas river.
FIRST PRECINCT.
All east of Kansas avenue
SECOND PRECINCT.
All west of Kansas avenue and south of Cor
don street.
THIRD PRECINCT.
All west of Kansas avenue and north of Cor
don street.