The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1895-04-10
THE COURT RECORD,


1874 Robbins vs. Spencer Gibson c. c.
Petition for rehearing overruled. MeCabe,
G. i'll After the grantor parts with his
in conflict with the same, and declarations
arter the execution Of tn the deed by the grant
When by succession of title a. party to a
suit is so far in privity with another that
he could be affected by his acts, then he
when they are made during the latter's
interest in the subject matter Of the suit,
the interests 50 that they " viii follow Wit it
into the hands of his successor
1879. City Of indianapolis VS.. Higgins.
word town is generic and comprehends
cities. e. A street Is private highway. 9;
furnishing fast driving upon sidewalks of
the city of Indianapolis Is null and void,
being in conflict with Section 1909 Revised
ever an act is made public offense against
; The State by any statute and the punish
be made punishable by any ordinance of
any incorporated city or town. 4. Obstruct-
ing Highway is an off Ten against tp the
and not by city ordinances.
1867. Bonebrake vs.. Board of Commits
il. Where a witness has been called
and shown to be an expert and when he
Conclusions his opinions may be given for
the information OF the jury. z. a demur-
rer to the evidence admits all the facts
ence and conclusion that may rightfully
and reasonably be drawn from the evil
resulting from the negligent failure on their
part to keep bridges on public highways
in repair without regard to the cost or the
1895. p. c., c. & st. L. Railway Com
pany VS.. Sullivan. Cass c. Z: Reversed.
to O. It's employees for the malpractice. of its
surgeon any further than its negligence
geon and il the employee had the privilege
Of rejecting the physician that was fur,
nished grstutiously by the company pair ana h1t
this this right he does not exercise and ac-
cepts the physician furnished by the COM
1aSo tn porsett vs. city Of Greencastle
Putnam c. G. Hackney, i'm a. complaint
averred and breach thereof by the de-
1851 Alexander VS.. Alexander. Monroe
C. c. Motion to retax costs ovcrruieu.
Appellate Court.
1850. Hunt vs. Markle. Huntington c.
c. Affirmed. Ross, G. J.--When it Is APP
parent that a court did not err in allowing
ment. after being modified, was all that
was recoverable under the issues as formed,
its ruling will be sustained; ..,.o
1867 Railsback VS.. Railsback. Fulton e.
C. Reversed. Gavin, il. A special yer
diet or finding should state ultimate facts
SUFFICIENT to support a Judgment are stated.
the presence of conclusions of law will not
ytiate the verdict her Wife mg nar
ents for the alienation of her husband
affections but the motives of the parents
will be presumed good until proved to be
I4Os. wood VS.. LindIey. vanderburg S.
c. Reversed Davis, il. The rule of in
and even every word should, when possi-
ble have assigned to it some meaning and
Is not That to Pe pare in so
emn transaction have employed language
idly The surrounding circumstances and
situation of the parties where the contract
was made may be considered. 2. Where
there is particular recital in deed. and
Shall Be uualified by the particular recital
1888 Wilson VS.. Dyer Marion $. c. Pc
tition for rehearing overruled -
ington G. G.. Petition for rehearing over
ruled.
ison C. c.. Transferred to Supreme Court.
Superior Court.
Room 1-John L. McMaster, Judge.
chas. Dwinnel VS.. Isaac Richie ct al.
The Acme Paving and Cement Com
pany VS.. B.. keenan,; Improvement lien.
Dismissed and costs paid.
The Acme Paving and Cement Company
missed and costs paid.
Mary f. Moore VS.. Henry II. Beville ct
al: foreclosure. Judgment for plaintiff for
Room S-Pliny w. Bartholomew. Judge.
Chas. Williams VS.. Eugene Hariss; re-
pleyin. Dismissed at defendants costs.
VIM. HAYNES VS.. Z. j. Forsythe; street
lien. Dismissed and costs paid.
Lee Fulmer James r. Carney; street
lien. Dismissed and costs paid.
Hughes Watson vs.. Indianapolis Lumber
end Veneer Company; damages. On trial by
jury.
Edgar A. Brown, Judge.
Hugh Sweeney VS.. Patrick G. Leary; on
note. Finding in favor of plaintiff. Judg-
ment VS. defendant for s565.l and costs.
George ID. Dessar VS.. Henry Deitch; re-
pleyin. Dismissed and costs paid.
New Suits Filed.
John A. Harmon VS.. Maggie +. Harmon;
suit for divorce. Superior Court, Room 8.
Court Cotton VS.. the American Install
ment Company; suit for damages. Superior
Court, Room ?.
Hannah Nj. snyder VS.. John Snyder; suit
for divorce. Superior Court, Room /.
Bethany Assembly BOARD Meeting.
of Va ha cl