Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1895-09-25

or three explanations for this resisna.
tlon occur 10 me. The Il st Ia the belief
on the part Of the receivers that the
evidence which would be produced vt
Seattle In supporl Of my charges
against them would be 20 httong ami
convincing that they would be unable
TO Ieiuts 1t, and therefore would be
discharged.
"Another resson that suggests itself
is that they have thought that by bring
ing the matter TO an Issue In Judge
Jenkins's court before the tinIo sp.
pointed for tho trial in Judge HnL-
ford'a court, they Nigh. secure mn order
or decision from Judge jenkins which
would be favofAbls TO them or obtain
from him tue appointment Of receivers
OF their own who would be In bympsthy
with them, or possibly their own reap
nolntment with tho assurance from
Judge Jenkins that he would sustain
them to tue full extent OF his author
iiy.
"These are the only reasons that &C.
cur 10 me nj the moment.
"lDasmueh ~ l have been trying
for two years TO secure the removal o.
the receivers chiefly on the ground
that they were agonts OF the parties
who wrecked the property, II Ia not
strange that should be glad TO hear
OF their rcslgnRtlong. No matter what
lessons they may give, 1 think q large
portion % tno public will believe that
they resigned because they dare not
undertake tho task OF Teiutng my
charges.
al wish II Understood that have no
personal III will towards any ono OF
the receiver. They were appointed
At tbs fequett Of party Of unucrupu-
lo-r wreckera and were obliged either
10 continue the same methods Of man.
agsmont or be false tn the men who
secured thoiI app 1intmsut.
"Wbiie not charging them with
having made money Improperly l do
charge them with having tquAnderci
large sums VI money belonging ~ the
trust estate, In an Illegal ana improper
manner and 1 believe that ono reAson
why they are unwilling 70 fils their
accounts Ia Judge HAniords court IL
that they are afraid 10 submit them 10
the scrutiny OF impartial expert ae-
couDisnlS."
4 snREwD MOVE.
TACOMA, WASH, Sept. 25.-ufoat In
tetcst ~ taken In Tacoma IN the Teslg.
nation OF tho Northern Pacific rees,v-
CTS. The action = regarded by the
well Informed A. the nfst OF feries
! OF shrowd mbY-a by which the IT,
ceivsfs and instr caunsel expect ~
have settled the question Of who the
receivers will report TO and take their
orders fram. IL IL considered likely
that one OF two things viii happen;
| First, that tho reslgnatiOng will not be
accepted anu the receivers will DO dl.
feetcd by the Milwaukee court 90 pro.
| coed With the administration OF their
trust and continue to report 10 Judge
Jenkins, 10 which event thoy might
refuse to recognise the right, or ht
least the pfoprisiy OF Judge H,nford's
| court TO interfere. This would practi-
cally narrow the contsBt 10 differences
OF judgment between coordinate
branches OF the federal judiciary.
There IL little doubt, however, but
the receivers and their counsel viii
appear before Judge Hanford on Octo-
Der Ia compliance with his order.
X Secondly II IL considered probable
that II the designations arc accepted or
while under advisement an arrange
ment will be made between the judges
| OF the Seventh, Eighth and Ninth
circuits whereby Judges Jenkins, Cald-
well and Haniord respectively, will
each appoint one receiver. In this
event II 10 supposed Judge Haniotd
would name seattle man, and It IL
suggested that Judges jenkins AND
Caldwell might fs-appoint two Of the
| present receivers, probably allowing
hr. Payne to retire on account Of ~
health. Receiver counsel arc pfoRar-
Ing most actively ;or the coming IL al
bsttle, as 10 evidenced by the hutiled
trip Of Judge Crowley, Of Tacoma,
,nsuial counsel 10 the receivers, 10 Now
York to consult with counsel Crou-
we'll. He spent i've days there, ~
turning yesterday 10 co.tinge prepare.
lioss at this End OF the lin. Judge
Crowley will not talk regarding the
case.