The record-union., 1895-05-18
SUPREME COURT.
ONE.


SACRAMENTO. Friday, May II, 1895.
Court met at 10 O'Clock a. NJ. Present.
Harrison, j., presiding; Garoutte, j.; Van
Fleet, j. Marshall, Deputy Clerk; Russell.
Bailitf.
6,36O-Capital Gas Company VS.. Young.
/ as Auditor-By consent cause submitted on
| briefs on file.
! S,4o4-Gregory vs. Spfeker-J. w. Arm
strong appeared for respondent. Cause sub
mltted on briefs on file.
is. .421-Thresher VS.. Gregory Brothers-By
consent cause submitted on briefs on file.
Is 375-Weinstock, Lubin & Co. VS.. Marks
Argued by ). :. Holl for appellant; argued
by Grove l.. Johnson for respondent; argued
IN reply by A. l.. Hart for appellant. Cause
submitted.
1S,40l-In the matter of William Curtis,
as SuperVlsor-Argued by White for appel
liant; argued by y. 5. Holl for respondent; re-
cess TIL < P. NJ; argued IN reply by Grove L..
Johnson Tor appellant. Cause submitted.
1S,442-Foot VS.. Hunt, as executor-1n this
cause Van Fleet, j., being disqualified, did
in this cause, vice Van Fleet, j., disqualified
). 5. Holl appeared for appellant; argued by
w. c.. Belcher for respondent Cause sub
mitted.
is, S,42S-Moleneaux vs. State of California
Argued by W. +. Fitzgerald, Attorney-Gen-
eral Tor appellant; argued by w. e. Belcher
Tor respondent Cause submitted.
IS, ,317-W elch, as administrator, vs.. Co.
sumnes Tribe. etc.-Argued by j. ii. McKune
for appellant; argued by Grove l.. johnson
for respondent; argued in reply by G. w.
Baker for appellant. Cause submitted.
Adjourned.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
SACRAMENTO, May II, 1895.
Court met at 10 A. NJ. Present: Mcfarland,
J., presiding; Temple j.; Henshaw, j. Nc
Craney, Deputy Clerk; Girvin, Acting Baiiitf.
1S,376-DaviS VS.. Ward ct aI.-Argued by
j. A. Hanna for appellant; argued by e. c.
Farnsworth for respondent: argued in reply
by j. A. Hanna for appellant. Cause SUBJ
mtted.
1S,433-San Joaquin Lumber Company vs.
Welton ct al.-Motion TO dismiss appeal ar
gued by Fred II. Hood for appellant: by J. A.
Allen Ior respondent. Ordered that appeal
be dismissed without predjudice: also that
respondent be allowed to file suggestion of
diminution OF the record. Cause submitted
on briefs on file.
1S,446-Tulare County Bank vs. Maddux
ct al.-Ordered that appellant be allowed to
file suggestions of elimination of record and
certificate OF correct error in transcript. By
consent OF counsel cause submitted on briefs
on file.
8.452-Gidding ct al. vs. The "7eo Land
and Water Company-Argued by ]. w.
thompson for appellant; argued by A. Dag
gett for respondent; argued in reply by J. w.
thompson for appellant. Cause submitted.
1S,3o1-Ahe Marysvile Electrical Power
Company VS.. Johnson-By consent OF counsel
cause submitted upon briefs on file.
l6.3S9-Gard, Sr.. VS.. Gard, Jr., ct al.-Ar-
gued by W. IL. Carlin for appellant; argued
by j. H. Craddock for respondent; argued in
reply by w. IL. CaTlin for appellant. Cause
1S,397-The Vermont Marble Company vs..
Brow, as Constable-PurSuant to stipulation
filed cause submitted on briefs on file
is, ,46T-kumle vs. Grand Lodge A. o. L.
w. BY consent of counsel cause submitted
upon briefs on file.
Court adjourned for the term.
IN BANK.
SACRAMENTO, Friday. May II, 1895.
l.. a. 3o- Banning VS.. MISUNDERSTANDING
denied. MCFARLAND, Acting g. j.
,392-kendall vs. Earl Brothers-Ordered
cause submitted on the brief of appellant
now on file, and briefs to be filed as follows
BY appellant within fifteen days from this
date by respondents within fifteen days
thereafter, and by appellant within ten days
thereafter. MCFARLAND, Acting 9. j.
Dated May II, 1895.