The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1895-06-14
THE COURT RECORD.


lf26l. Yost VS.. ~ st. Cass G.. G. Reversed.
Jordan, il. 1t Is an imperative duty of the
court In decreeing divorce to the wife or
IN refusing one TO the husband to make an
allowance sufficient to cover al reasonable
expenses OF the wife In the prosecution or
defense of the action. but in making this
allowance the court shall take into cons;d-
Grafton all other allowances That were made
to her during the tendency of the action.
=. An allowance made pendente lite is made
regardless of the merits of the petition 3.
The final determination by the court of the
reasonable expenses that ought TO be al
lowed is a matter that must be postponed
until the final decree is rendered.
Washing ton C. c. Motion to dissolve re-
straining order sustained. Per curtain. A
building of a new coirthonse in another
town in the county. and the building there
or. Will not constitute removal of the
1851. French VS.. State ex rel. Harley
LaPorte c. c. Affirmed. Hackney, il.
Section 2. acts 1895, page 160 which makes
OF State and Encouragement a board Of
prison directors is constitutional. =. The
powers of the government are the execu-
tive. legislative and judicial 8. The General
Assembly is empowered to designate the
person. body or functionary to make the
appointments for prison director. 4. An act
nulled by the judiciary unless it clearly
contravenes some provision of the Consti-
tuition, and all doubts must be in favor of
the validity of the statute.
lilo. Lilly VS.. SonieFville. montgomery
L. e. I.
part of several co.parties appeal from a
Judgment against all OF them. those appeal
ing must join all such co-parties as co-ap-
pellants, and give notice TO those not ap-
pealing
172O5. Bible VS.. voris. Montgomery C. C.
Petition for rehearing overruled.
Appellate Court.
Reversed. 'So Reinhard is e. il. Mere self
serving declarations made by party in the
absence of the other are not competent to
them unless the declaration is made during
the performance of an act which is itself
the subject of iegitimate pro9e OF. :; The
and her declarations in furtherance of such
acts are competent TO be introduced as
evidence in her behalf. although the dec
larations without the act are not admiSsl-
1882 Fargo VS.. Reighard. I.aPorte c. c.
Petition for rehearing overruled. Ross, j.
Where facts are submitted TO arbitration
to ascertain the value of interests. the ar
bitrators have right. after their award has
mission by the parties
1915 Jameson VS.. Ebersole. Huntington
G. C.. Affirmed Ross, il. When the APP
peal raises q consideration of the evidence.
IL must be properly in the record i'm order to
be considered at all :. The record must
I'm the clerks office after it was signed by
the Judge. g. When the record does not
otherwise show the decision or grounds OF
objection thereto. the party Directing must
within such time as may be allowed present
to the Judge a proper bill of, exceptions,
which II true he shall properly sign and
cause it TO be filed i'm the cause: II not true,
the Judge shall correct, sign ana cause TO be
fled without delay. -
164S Bedford Belt Railway Company VS..
Burke. Lawrence c. c. Affirmed. Gavin,
il. knowledge is an essential element
for the ratification of a contract ?. y spe-
cial finding must disclose all the facts es-
sential TO recovery.
1855 Rogers vs.. Schneider. Marion S. G.
Reversed Lotz i'll. IT is within the
power and il is the duty of the court TO di-
rect a verdict in "A proper case. If the con-
trolling facts are we'll taken or undisputed.
. The right of vendor of personal prop
crty TO retalSe il before Vt comes into the
poSsesson of an insolvent vendee will be
favored on account of its intrinsic justice.
z The taking of notes for purchase money
does not deprive the vendor OF the right OF
stoppage In transltu.