Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1895-11-17

| introducing new tra linOUy. but to reiter
ate that which had been previously stated
before the jury. fhe gensrei ru,e as isia
| down By the sianite Is that all TESTIMONY
SHAH be aaduccd before the jury hsior,
the beginning Or the argument Article
bhli Code Criminal Procedure how Yer,
provides that IN one contingent the eou
may authorize the intlodnfuon OF rNl'
dence after the Rrgumsnt has begun and
bsiore It's close, and under the ordinary
rules OF constt1ctlon w arc lUunp 10 cont
strue This ea an exception to the genera!
| RUE, ana tho exception marks the Unit
OF the power Of the court In this regard
! u says 'eylience may Dee iuttOdu2tl nr'
fore the cl1sg Of the argument and 10
| our minds this language conveys the .d-l
| that evidence should not be introduced
allcr the Close OF the argument IA ha
strong terms us " the legislature mac
| said 20 IN direct language 40 We hud no
| statute on the subject wo might he M
| clinei 20 enlarge tho rule and to ADMIT
| sest,liinohy al lDit9n. ~ sln' tssne'es ~
| pealnB 70 tho discretion OF the court
| might arise after the jury had retired 10
| consider the case; but Htill n We nah
! no statute. such rule would be OF DOUBT
! ful proprlcty and would rln lcr the irihl
| OF cases intermlnnbie. but hay .rg sint-
| ute en- the subject, which puts up the
| gap against the Introduction % testimony
| after Tie agumcnt has been conoiuue q,
| We are forbidden 10 consult cmerECncia ~
\ or 10 make q new rule, founded unon
| judicial discretion OUTSIDE tho statute,
| or evidence somewhere. ana n We depart
! from our statute on the subject me
q uef u9h tnth Eoud 'e' M,,,,,,' g ,Nlir, ~.
wolil Iseiar,, XXI no iitiIIer tvtientc
| "oifI" t''.'it't" ''iaat ~, t'' 'a',it,
| plv lac M XIX WIN ma rtiia ar IA, e,,b-
jtst save ' 'J az iuisI 'HeaoS i,y nv might
suggest. So whatever hardship may re.
SUIT ln any particular gtr We urh'Fe
| that tho administration Of IHS De-" SIS ho4t
cunserved by udhorIug to the PLATA rules
OF ,sW ~ enonc'IIg n ,"'t sI n,,r,,sc
Of IN. article Ia "ueattGn was 90 ual,
tho Urt,t Iry4nd which LOO court rnnuIu
he autbDrIzed to inflow tl. Iufrldu. fll
OF testimony, and as the court In TINS
Saae in mdn3ittint tIs tt.t.nignV III Wit
ncsser as ~ Nj" rftfge ~ mo licensed
Iarty Violated Tho pfoyI. ions n otr sItt-
gevors,.1
II In9 bc,, ,,t,.,efpd ,it,t fla, gtpta-
,,,,. ~ 49," H. t7 ,so sli,,.., I.,, D. .
"g,8c 51 yviii,3gis os ,Ii.g@J io trc
s5a ,yn' ra'po4t ly aSd Io by N,itpe2.
oa 1i,s Nyu.Is,ga a,t the viz. az H. b..
NyuIjsfgg Ike MN I4nt TUts A. Hou.f-
"a inii oon,sIIrp tiint a.. r"nt.t. an
is correct. thp matter should Rave boon
given .o the jury 20 me a. 200 wh ie me
' ",'5.,,t' ky o' g,,it J,y, 4,i., gf
su.., "'' IL. I',,.r r tt., or am.
ttt5nl,' ii'""gtti,,n" ,.,.i ,d a., p,. FAX "''
"iI'I gn 5unH H'nltnu ~ We ky ID, CID
~, .. lN' wv" NIX ,5t,,'.
u a, KY ,.., H., ,'''r' a.,
u'"l ""i 't IN' ''l.l ,' 'N' 'W'l' 'y
i.I',n5 ,.s ,,.i,rl,.,,, nf a., l,y'r
INt hIhNU'N lt IlI" 4lIEN''"' NI All' NV
'9,,r, ~ i, ,ii i',,
'b'h'"H wy H"NN'' ''"' '"'H''
ig,,t, t.rt,t.,r,,rtrt, t.,, t..,,.,, ,.,,,t,..
,un,irtIun ar do lI.n oI "a COW ani
u8uulmunt tHaoHsHi uf two years lu
lI' bNhN"NN"''- AhI'h'H
Ih" objection urged hy ho appellant 60
iii. rr,Ut f.t uY bu .I .u., ab.ygIUr
tt.,,,.f., ICON, w.. a hf,,..i.u. a., ,I,. A..
i''''''' li'"' N".' "''''''' q" '"' '''-
lulHsA County InuI anl Cattle com.
rHuv WHH Introduced Boo "FIIuur" ~ mot
NtI 1uI,"U. fIuf proof could Nr made hN