The Louisiana Democrat. [volume] (Alexandria, La.) 1845-1918, 1895-02-20
DISTRICT COURT.
TUESDAY. FEB. u.


His Honor, Judge An
drews, presiding.
Bertrand We'll administrator vs.: The
New York Life Insurance Company.
Motion to strike out the testimony OF
witness, Geo. Bauer, sustained in so
far as it effects the interest OF his wife
in this suit. Judgment in favor Ut plain
tiff for $339.50, with interest from Dec
IL, 1898, up to Jan. Z, 1894, being the
date of the tender made by the defend-
ant and the costs OF suit up to SAID date.
Further ordered that the demand OF the
plaintiff for the amount of the life insu-
rance be rejected at plaintiffs costs.
VIM. Jones vs.. A. T. Hoff & Son.
Judgment in favor Of Defendant revers-
ing judgment OF the Lower Court and
rejecting plaintiffs d,mand with costs
in both courts.
Succession of Louis Tennessee, on
opposition Of Mrs. VIM. Bush. Juds-
ment in favor of opponent, recognizing
her as priviledged creditor of the Sue
cession for the sum OF $75, with recos-
niion of privilege upon the fund arising
from the sale OF the. horses described III
the petition, and costs.
l. C. Miller vs.. Joe Aer1ker and W. Il.
Duncan. Answer filed and case set tol
Goth inst.
/. C. Miller VS.. Joe Aertker Answer
filed and case set for 20 inst.
r. Lawson Walker vs.. Texas & Pacific
R,R. Co. This case coming over IRON
the day ;previous was taken up and trial
| proceeded with until the hour vi ad-
iournment.
THURSDAY, FEB. II.
The District Court met pursuant to adj
journment, His Honor, Judge Andrews,
pre- iding.
Jacob Levin, husband vs.. Pearl Vein
berg, wife. Judgment of absolute di.
vorce in favor Of plaintiff {Levin) and
decreeing the custody of the child al
prayed for.
Louis E. Ball vs.. Julius Levin & Co
Reassigned for April 3rd, and witnesses
ordered to return ON that day withou
further summons, and the Sheriff or
dered to summon 20 tales jurors to serv'
in this case that day.
John S. Sullivan Va. E. j. Sullivan
Judgment in favor of plaintiff for tn
sum of $6,7eS. ~ with per cent intcres
on S5,O77. so from this date and costs
G. w. Bolton VS.. l. II. Taryer. An
swer and prayer for jury filed by defend
ant and case set for 2lst inst.
j. F. Ariail was appointed Distrie
Attorney pro tenn, aud tilcd Bill Of Ii
, formation against Charles Stevenson fo
;, larceny. Accused plead guilty and W
sentenced to be confined in the paris
Jail for months End TO pay costs {
prosecution.
Z A Bill of Information vas also pr
}, sented against Geo. jackson alias Brow
charged with larceny. lie plead gull
and was sentenced TO be confined in Il
penitentiary for IL months.
James NJ. I.inzcy, Jr. vs.. j. L. Harpc
Judgment in favor CT plaintiff for $li
l. with 5 per cent. inter, st from Jan. l,
;. 1895, and costs.
RI. Walker VS.. T. & T. r. r. Tt
, case taken up and trial proceeded wi,
. Not being concluded it was laid over.
It FRIDAY, FfB'Y, 18TH.
D. District Court met pursuant to a
IF jonrnment, his Honor Judge Andrew
y presiding.
~ Benjamin L. Hciiingsfcltl VS.. 81. +
= stein. Case tried pursuant to asals
{. ment and judgment rendered IN favor
D. Plaintiff for $50, with 8 per cent. int
~ est from December 9th, 1894, sustaini
-, the writ of attachment AID ordering
property attached to be sold to sat
70 tho Judgment; third opposition of L.
M Duffy sustained and his vendors lien
We cognized on the trunks claimed in
lie petition. Intervention of the Metrop
tan National Bank Of Kansas City ,
missed.
Hooker Knight Shoe Co. vs.. NJ.
A' stein. Judgment iu favor of Plaintiff
the sum of $72 rs, with per cent. in
est from November 10th, 1894, and i'll
hu further sum of $3.50, with 8 per cent.
ng terest from December 31st, 1894, aud
ng tanning the attachment.
nd Metropolitan National Bank of ka'
o. City VS.. NJ. Epstein. Judgment in fl
. of Plaintiff for the sum of $l4G.35, '
VIZ 8 per cent. interest from December
eX- 1894, and the further sum of $l8(
be with 8 per cent. interest from Jan,
rlv It'll, 1895. Also Judgment for $3.50,
=, 8 per cent. interest from January
1895, and sustaining the writ of att
" ment.
Mrs. Annie Roberts, wife, vs..
Blum. husband. Judgment in fav'
Plaintiff, dissolving the communit!
acquets and gains.
Adele Anderson VS.. John G. Ro!
Executor. Case submitted and t;
dis under adyisement.
to r. Layson Walker VS.. Texas & Pa
ger Railway Co. Trial Of this case resi-.
),ar from the day previous, concluded
a. n..lar I'D iro..,xnt