The times. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1890-1903, 1895-07-31

running on sundays was just as sscntial
as other works Of necessity on that day.
Public opinion was absolute and very de-
fcrminfi 20 the effect that the running
of the cars. the poor mans carriage, was
necessary on Sunday, ana he, therefore.
asked The Court 20 exempt the poor mans
carriage from the grip Of the law.
DISMISSED TIE CASTS.
Justice Crutchfeld in Diminishing the
case said that he thought that street
can, we're exempt from the provisions OF
fne Sunday law under ne statute OF
Virginia. and be added that his decision
in This one case. of course. carried with
30 the other similar cases pending before
him at The time.
TIP SKWspAPEhs FINED.
The next question taken up was the
charges against Mr.. II. Theodore Eilyson
manager of the Dispatch Company, ana
against Mr. a. r. iOiderby, j., manager
OF The Times Company. Tor puplshlhs
newspaper and causing the employees
Of the said companies TO labor al their
trades and callnes on sunday.
~ the suggestion of Major Charles :.
SfnnefellOw. counsel for The Times Com
uanv. who in the absence OF Mr.. William
rINson. also represented The Dispatch
C0muanv. the court agreed 10 nave the
charges so changed that the respective
companies be- inserted for the names OF
the individual mar ayers.
MAJOR .bn ch"rges AGAINST his
tro ,,,,reesed his regrets. how
.'., M not heinc prepared at that time
% argue the case having neeh Caii'v ~, ~
only on the previous day. lie added tnal
Mr. Ellvson. counsel of the Dispatch Com
many would not Doe able TO be present
before Friday.
Justice Crltchheld. upon question
asked by Major suingieioM. auil'' ',.'
in r.rard 10 the matter before him, and
.,,,rt ,,o NV Ms clients FOR a nne OF
s. and "a cents costs for each company.
er8 mar anreals he taken. Mr.. String
f.ll.,- ,vas recognized 10y the court as
e,,r,fv for the two companies for their
arncarance i'm the Hastings Court during
th6 September term.
The other violations OF the SUNDAY Jaws
we're fhen disposed of 50 that in most
instances one person was nned ON
particular charge IN order that an APP
peal might be- TAKEN ana thdt VIZ 800
charged with the same offence had their
cases continued until the dluete"i ,cs'
cases had been disposed of In the hust-
in-s Court.
Peter Thompson icclored was chdrteu
With delivering fee cream on sundays;
Ho stated that ne had been -hlpihle'
hv "a policeman he had % ilsht 20 luahe
ff. deliveries. but not TO keep MS store
pl.u. NotWithstand this statement ne
WIS fined 50 80 and took an appeal
d. 4. Walters. W. +. Hazclgr0Ve' ana
J. II. Siruaigo. charged with the same
.ff.ree had their cases continued.
as TO LIVERY slAD"hS'
~ ,-,.. ,ho nvorv-etahle man.
-. % - Win birin.. ont a team,
' ht cae. continued Intu to-day in
&C.. ,Isonc. of nm important witness.
Afaior A " CARRIER was arraigncd on
,t roo of hauling baggage and rum
ri,... h~-ke for tha TRANSFORMATION Of pas
''.,,..,s
.t.o ..r,+ahGaid stated that he was
...l, ,rc,,,re5 ~ saw mat the work Major
i.'. ~ fa. -, .t,,..l vim was not Il
90. ,'ei ''.7,.lit,, A. to Tho charge o.
", ,'ni,, h.cke he thought eacn case
.,'',i',5 l,,,o M re own merits. so as Il
.',,.,,i, V.,etber they had been en-
az w. er'iii1linq n,irposes lie added
-"5.p tot ~, H. ,hceo cases the bur
,' wy L.,'id reef with the Com
neh OF ti""i 1919 ~ s,s,a,ce lin charles
"ehN,ai .i. ~, ''''
were ulSlllissru' . ,.1,o,, a., rcrord To-
-nli,"r a'''Dn ""S S,r Ford. who
he charge against AT. y ,a,,,,.Ni nan.
was rcpresctted by Mr.. Mcdowell MAJ" an
agcr OF Ford's Hotel. lot Iuliiil'.7 80, -
for the transportation OF pdsSt4'H'.33 =.
and from the hotel; also, IN lesa'u 10
the charge AGAINST me- yo,,..' 10 ~
DRIVING hack; also, ~ releIcHSt 20 ~
charge against l.. \. Fox, for deilEetlts
baggage. and that against AhereN 'i 81
MAI aSer OF the Southern 1920 i''
hauline perlshabie goods ON SuI'''as rood
Willie Johnson icoloreu) was 0iiS. G -
with selling newspapers AZ tn' 81 ssv ~,
depot on sunday. he was H''0" F-''
and an appeal taken - $3.50
Joseph Ensleours was hheu tN' 'aiIl
amount for selling cigars ana papers
and an appeal was taken. ,r--.,.. ,~o
Gcofee Harris ana sam layloI w.
charged win selling neWspap,Is OH yum
day. had their cases continued.
cter Gonclla was charged win tcil,
ms linll on sunday, ana ne Mas M
So An appeal was taken, Niiie tlc
fo-oMlNs lInli uealels hdu men ,"SIS
coniin9 lanes MafSsiiV, nii5 Xo,,,,c
Alorrano and e.. j. Gregory.
acliv.rine 2sb en- SnnGav. He paid MS
GAIA or4tre1 fbof ibc money Maid i'm IL
Nir ami he v,,thheld from me stare
= roae,,rv mill Inc caec bs1 heen decided
IT, the Huefin~e Co,,rt in order that
-, ,,o,,e,, r,is,h, ~ ot,,r,ea Va hin,
a. ,d Sncisio,, ~ ,h, 49,. - ,bo,,id
r. ,,,.ereos Va '''0 '0"N' OV"
" IInlros ,,as e,oa e. co for do
tt,,'.,,e deb c.bii. MY" rS 80 ~
,,fs case contsnnnI H. - '0""'' ia"
ne SS",.i "ot -, i'll, ,.,...o.....,
III i,,,,' On"'sen WIN HcnNSrlic
49, ~ INNS "S'' was "heu ana 'ooh "h