Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1895-03-26
The DISTRICT COURT.
BE.Sup.rInlsndslt Of WatcTBOTkS
RYAN On Trial for EmbszlIsmsli,
A JUns WAS UNABLE TO AGREE
Louis ilyam, aud John Erwin Awarded
$1,000 in the Note
tusr.

Tho trial Of W. ii. Ryan, tE.Hupor.
intouIout OF walcrwoIEs Tor Salt Lake
city, upon the charge Of tmUo1li,-
mont was resumed before judge
Bauch aud jury this morning, AZ
sistant District Attorney Howat pro-.
ccuung and A,tom,y j. 81. Denny
defending.
Tho prosecution claims that Ryan,
during the year 1893, had certain hfioa
aud lime, 90 the value q g5i, delivered
at bis residence, which hc cInvrrtsI
20 hiH0wu utu, tul suuiCVuuttiy Cufu.
Dot 20 the correctness bili0 pusUutul
o. the city co. On lHu hrms from whom
thr material was purchased, nfiui
which tho bills were paid by tao city,
under tus uelief trut lhc m4tuli-i 4.s
purchased by Mr Ryan Tor municipal
purrDsU-.
The defendant docs not deny that
material was utui by ulm aaI puIiY
by tlu city, iu. bee will A.lu.u tuht tur
presentation Ui ihu uIIii o. Sac city wa.
tho Io.ult 0i uu error mhdu ny uIH
CLERK, as great many city uuIH Wrfu
presented iu bis name Instead 90 toe
namu tt the muuiC'p1l cooperation.
william Naury anu john valley
to6tlfeI win relation o. limo having
been ordered by Ryan and thu Iu.
livery Df the Same fH nl- residence,
and a. W. Rayuouid tsIitd innt toe
bills Tor tno iimr, As wsiiHs tue Hrga,
wore presented o. nm by Valley,
Joseph & -. AID J. ". Kennedy, e.
tpuciivoIy, with tuu cutuhCalDu that
they were correct, uul that hu iHuuu
wsfmuts f1r the smIuntH.
Judge iJwu, offered sue hilis iu uvi.
deuce. but they we're uuIugt-I 90 hy
Mt. Denny upon the ground tpat they
were no. "mUnoy, evidence % iud9u b.
cduc'a anu wafrants,' which Ryan
was charged ~ the Indictment win
having cmbCzElei.
No Dunuy argued his ouitut1a uu.
til court JIurnsd aud tufumud his
Argument lyon tue ft-AsaBmuuuy ui
court tHi' mofuiug
The ohio ton was 0vtFrJiOl cd
further evidence i,r tue prosecute 10
taken.
THIS Afternoon che defendant ny
went upon the witness stand. lie
testified that on April 2lst he diI not
order any lime b. the uamo OF Salt
Lake City. Seventy bushels were
sent 70 hlu house by NHriyy, Joseph
d Co., but hc himself never ordered 10,
Hud dld not know VINO hnI. WunuH,
lad told q tramstuf uamuI sam Suhill
90 get lime aud take 10 10 bis hUu.r,
anu gave HIM $50 60 psy Tor 10. IL was
tfuc the bil had been sent ~ the
wAtcrwufIs department ant paid n.,
tofwafde, tut as soon ~ he discovered
tots no refunded the amount 10 tn,
city auditor
Tue case was pr.c-td,ug when "a,
NEWS report closed.
nsfore Judge Merritt.
The case Of T.. NJ. Talbot AMI
Elsie ID. Talbot W. r.. BoYlo Is com
pany (F. Boyle, Kate Boyle, W. J
Began And Mary Bogaul was thUt
called up for trial before Jury
Powers, Slmup q Lippman Tor ia,
plaintiffs, Judge Cnerry aud Attorney
J. NJ. Hamilton for tue defendants.
suit Il brought 10 recover the sum O.
$3.50, being tho amount claimed o.
have been paid In various email sum.
.on the purchase " certain IlOls Of tea
estate iu the year 1890.
IN" case went 10 the Jury th1rll!
Aitet PM
uNE AuWEEp-UNE uiDS'L
Two sealed yufdictg had boon Ca
pectrd 10 Chief Justice Merrltt'H c0uf
this morning on cases submitted 10 tWl
lutlcs yesterday, but one only va
brought 40. Tue other Jury havlu.
failed 60 ngroC, they were disohatFcI
In the uo,c suit Of Louis Hyams an
John Irwin Va Salisbury nud S,mu
BamL eyer the jury came in 90 I
O'clock aud ptlrnsl un1ulmUu
verdict Ne favor of thu uluiutlll IJT tu
sum Of 81, uOJ, a thirty days sIHI
was gtgnttd tue doiuuiauis' uyuugu
10 ITerorr statement on motion Tor
new trial.
La the appeal case Of Taylor, Rom
ncy ami Atmttt0ug Go, W d. U. II
Dlgge, trud yesterday afternoon, o
which plaintiff claimed sil,Bl n
work done, the jury announced cha
they we're unable To- agree ur0n o vel
dict nud Judge Merritt discharge
them from further satyigp inlh0 matte