Santa Fe daily New Mexican. [volume] (Santa Fe, N.M.) 1885-1897, 1895-10-07
IN THE SUPREME COURT.
Adjourned Session Opened this Morn
ing-Cases Set for Hearing
Important Opinions to Be
Handed Down.

The New Mexico supreme court con-
vened in adjourned regular session at l
O'Clock this morning with Chief Justice
Smith presiding and Associate Justices
Laughlin and Bantz present. Inasmuch
as Associate Justices Hamilton and Col
her we're unable to be present this morn
ing on account of engagements in their
respective districts, an adjournment was
ordered until 10 O'Clock tomorrow morn
ing. 1t is understood that Judge Hamil-
ton will arrive tonight and Judge Collier
on Wednesday morning.
The following are the cases set for
hearing at this session.:
October mo. $50. Lyndonville Ma
tional bank vs.. s. M. Folsom; No. 584,
First National bank of Albuquerque vs..
John A. Lee.
October S-No. 629, GENTLE VS.. Ken
nedy; No. 1884, Territory VS.. Patrick Car
mody.
October 9-No. 566, Strauss vs.. Smith;
No, 585, johnson vs. Gallegos.
October 1O-No. 6lO, Robinson VS.. Ter
ritory; No. 612, Union Trust company VS..
A., T. q s. F. R. R. Co., Postal Telegraph
Gable Co., intervenor.
October l1-No. GIT, Stanton vs. Cat
ron; No. 635, Territory vs.. Romero.
1t is also expected that opinions will
be handed down in the twenty-one cases
previously argued and taken under ad-
visement. These cases are as follows:
j. G. Albright, ct al, appellees, vs..
Texas, Santa Fe & Northern Railroad
company, ct al, appellants.
Chas. Bent, ct al, appellants, VS.. Qua
dalupe Miranda, ct al, appellees.
The Maxwell Land Grant and Railroad
company, ct al, appellees, vs.. Guadalupe
Thompson, ct al, appellants.
Frank X. Eberle, plaintiff in error, VS..
William Carmichael, ct al, defendants in
error.
Charles W. Lewis, plaintiff in error, vs..
A. Fl. Shipley, defendant in error.
Charles W. Lewis, plaintiff in error, vs..
John Flournoy, defendant in error.
Joseph E. Saint, receiver, plaintiff in
error, VS.. Stephen M. Folsom, defendant
in error.
Abraham D. Coon, appellee, VS.. Bosque
Bonita Land & Cattle company, ct al.
In re assignment of Spitz Brothers.
Territory of New Mexico vs.. Roberto
Friday, convicted of murder in Santa Fc
county, appellant.
Territory of New Mexico vs.. Susano
Ortiz, two convictions for sheep stealing
IN Santa Fe county, appellant.
United States of America vs.. Alberto
Viena, appeal from End judicial district
Territory of New Mexico VS.. Brigida
Sisneros de Gutman, appeal from Ber-
nalillo county.
Territory of New Mexico vs.. Pedro
Garcia, appeal from Bernalillo county.
Territory of New Mexico vs.. Jesus
victed of murder in the first degree, ap-
peal from Santa Fe county.
Addison M. James, appellee, ct al, VS..
Marcus Brunswick ct al, appellants.
Territory of New Mexico vs.. Maria
Grigorla Vigil, appeal from Taos county.
United States OF America vs.. Joseph
Routledge, timber trespass, appeal from
LIST judicial district.
Territory of New Mexico vs.. Maximi-
ano Griego, murder, appeal from Socorro
county.
1t is also understood that Chief Justice
Smith will hand down the written opin-
ion of majority of the court in the cases
of Celso Baca, appellee, vs.. Demetrio
Perez, auditor, appellant, and the Terri
tory of New Mexico, ex rel George Cur
ry, president of the council, plaintiff in
error, vs.. Demetrio Perez, auditor, de-
PENDANT in error, otherwise known as the
cases involving the payment of the legis-
lative employees.
1t will be remembered that Judge
Laughlin, in the district court, rendered
judgments in these cases adverse to the
payment of the extra legislative en-
ployes, end that, at hearing on March
2, 1895, the supreme court reversed these
judgments and the employees were &C.
cordingly paid, but the handing down of
written opinion was deferred until the
regular term.
The appeals of Roberto Friday, Jesus
Vialpando and Feliciano Chavez involve
the sustaining or setting aside of death
sentences.
The charges pending before the court
against Messrs. Catron & Spess will
probably not be taken up until full
bench is present.