New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1895-11-20
TIE MARRIAGE WILL NOT 1AhE PLA|E'
ENGAGEMENT BETWEEN MISS WALTER AND THE
BROTHER OF OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES BARTH
SIDES SAY.

r,,c Acrup.,,T BETWEEN MISS WALTER AND THE
BROTHER OF AssEMBLYMAN- ELECT BARTH
BROKEN-wHAT BOTH SIDES SAY
Joseph Barth. OF stapleton, Staten Island and
Miss Clara Madeline Walter. of this city were 10
h. married to-day at the home Of the bride NO.
100 West Fifty-sevenih-st, but the eHsasoine"' was
recently broken
Mr. Rarth is a brother OF Assemblyman-elect
Gustave a Barth. who was chosen by the DEMO
Gratis at the recent election 70 represent staten
Island in the Assembly, and Is nephew OF MIS-,
Eva Rechtel widow OF the millionaire brewer OF
c,.,leton He is in the employ CT his aunt as as
sis,ant sIperintendent of the Bechtei Brewing
COMPANY Miss Walter Is daughter OF the ia'e
Richard Walter. a wealthy importer MI par III
is about twenty-four years Old, ana MISS waiter
is about the same age
- oo,,rle first met when Miss Walters brother,
o. = was engaged to be married to Miss Agnes
Bechtel 1t may be remembered that that engage
rnent was broken of by Mrs Bechtels coiii"anN
last spring The reason for TINS was never iii"u'
tnown Mr. Barth and Miss Walter became en-
Gagged about ten months ago Mr. Barth asserts
80, ba broke of the engagement whhe Mrs'
walter mother Of the young woman asserts sue
caused II 10 come 10 end. A few DAYS ago MI
parth received from Miss Walter all the presents nc
had given her, with the eAcep,'o" ts
diamond engagement ring. The articles y Is SAID
we're battered OF shape ana canno, pe vomns
The too. which passed snS rsceipttd for by
LAWYERS representing the interested paates ,aneton
parf when seen ytstciNoy a. -
81 4, vas true the engagement was ~ oneI' -
tS broken n he said because MISS NalleI ~ ~
~srlted mis- mother and sisters ana pecat,'ai q
- Jealous without cause: he hdu LA eirco
"as lion from Miss Walter. ne auued SIN.
~ hreakinR OF the engagement .ei.tis ra in
ri be fnldlled his engagement she Wouih III
sfItute proceedings against MN io1 " had been
So,nis. ~ marriage All his IN IN sni
MADE for the wedding, ne sdtu. ~ inia,ned and mis-
nd hem made the wedding Trip pIaiiHoU' al" 49,
ne, ne 80 az The brewery arranged TOT. ,x H..
N'ss Walter would not be sen laS' ne - some
Mss hnwever. contradicted Mr. barth ID SOM
iS1rgs She said II was true that tne ue ~ mad
..ss on end but said she was the one WI" I "a
c.rssd ber daughter 10 cease RECEIVING a. hi
s.,,ions She would not say wny she ",a oe hnsf
SsusnS further than that she tnoushoe ,nade ar
a. 90 dsnted that her daughter hdu III Mrs
rs,ra,ts for the marriage TO-DAY, az would
49, "a never believed that me |etiHde ,breaf-
80 ,{aca Her daughter, she addeu, iaI Ev-
90 Pc h-i,e a suit for breach OF Pio,h,s- mad
$1,000 Mr. Earth had gwen her "a .bsr article
- .,,-ned with one exception anu mo oeaker
49, 49, sa,, at the convenience % VIZ IL al
49, " IL feeling engendered between liz hra
,sr 10 Uach,el families on account on NV I'D Miss
e.I anu agsment between Mr. waiter anu Ne
80 80 still bitter was snow " ing
~ - asked II Mrs Bechtel hau In ~ her
~ ,,I,b ,he breaking OF the IL name
80 ~ ~, - NJ Barth When Mfs Dc. Lnoo ed pc
&c. ,to,ed Mrs Walters den-eI aias ns nm
=. - dxistsnce Of Mr. Bechtei itatsi hasn 6adly
So ,ha s,atement that her son ndu and her
$50 n n Rechtels Mrs he'i.t To- That en-
ts"eS,o. y,ent 10 Europe Few uass returned.
nsagnie. ven a byoken and only recently