The morning call., 1895-01-10

DloSOo04N6 ECONO ON
Mahoney of San Francisco, Linder OF
Inyo. Flint of Monterey. Orr of Santa
Barbara, Androus of Los Angeles and
Seymour of Orange. The Assemblymen
are these: Thomas of Nevada, Hatfield
of Sacramento, Gay OF Alameda, Davis OF
TpIare and Dale of Kern. and the ten Re-
publicaDs, not counting Ewing OF the San
Francisco delegation. The total OF this is
twenty-five, whom the Perkins people can
count as against them.
La the doubtful list of the Senate are
these: Brown Of Sutter and Frank of
Santa Clara. In the Assembly Tombln of
Del Norte. Bledsoe of Humboldt, Laird of
Modoc, Hall of Placer, Tibbets of ANA
dor, Wade of Napa, Bassford of SoIano,
Dunbar of Calaveias, Phelps of San
Mateo. Kelsey of Santa Clara, Mead of
Santa Clara, Richards Of Stanislaus, Car
gill of San Benito, Coleman of Alpine,
Llewelling aud Pendleton Of Los Angeles
and Lynch of San Beruardlno.
This represents two Senators and seven
teen AssembymeD or nineteen doubtful.
The figures as represented in this caucus
ND tonight stand forty-fve committed,
at least for the early voting, TO Perkins,
twenty five with convictions otherwise and
nineteen doubtful. The doubtful men, the
Perkins managers say, they are reason
ably sure of. Stood up in line asked for
an accounting the doubtful ones answer
about thus. Eugene Aram Of Sutter says
he is not satisfied with Perkins record and
wants to know how he stands on the
silver question. He would not sign the
call, but is not fixed in his opposition. F.
C. Frank of Santa Clara says much the
same. Tomblin of Del Norte the Perkins
people had not presented their petition to,
claiming that they could not fiud him.
Tnis was also the ease with Dunbar of
Calayeras, Phelps of San Mateo. Kelsey
and Meade of Santa Clara, Coleman of
Alpine and Llewelling and Pendleton of
Los Angeles.
The Los Angeles delegation was in
structed for Perkins, and therefore these
last two are counted upon and will no
doubt vote for Perkins fora length of
time That VIII satisfy tneir obligations in
that regard. although there are members
in it not so earnest in the business as
Humb boldt, the independent who has bis
own platform and says that whichever of
the candidates will subscribe TO Ii he will
! vote for, so he is not SO doubtful as he
looks, for neither is likely to fall into
line with him. Laird of Mo1oc processes
to be friendly toward Perkins. but did not
sign the call. Tibbetts of Amador is still
thinking over the situation and refused to
attend the friendly gathering. Wade of
Napa, although refusing to sign the call.
processes friendship for Perkins aud
called on him at his hotel this after
noon. BassfoTd OF SOlano. the Perkins
people claim as their own, although
he is not on the list. This is
the case with regard to Richards of Stanis-
laus and Cargill of San Benito and Glass
of San Benito. Gay OF Alameda. who re-
fuses to be bound by his instructions. al
though coming from a Perkins strong
hold, also refuses to admit that he as
tied by any instructions and claims that
the Perkins influence did not elect him.
He is still in the air with Hatfield of Sac
ramento. Flint is also reckoned by the
Perkins element as with them, but waiting
to disclose himself. Orr wrote a very
L
with him, but refused to sign. Hatfeld's 5
friends say he is honest In his opposition
to Perkins notwithstanding his instruc-
tions, claiming hat he does not believe
him sound on the silver question. Dale Of
| Bakersfield is not for Perkins, but be is
dead against De Young. Speaker Lynch
says he was instructed for Perkins and
will follow those instructions.
The De Young men laugh al this caucus
call as representing the loyal friends of
Perkins. They say that very many signed
it with 10 Intention of attending or being
bound by its action, and all that. They
explain the changing of the call from the
Republican caucus to that of meeting of
friends by the theory that the action of
caucuses Is intended to be binding, and the
very loyal friends who refused to attend
caucus for fear the caucus would declare
for Perkins really declined to attend for
fear they would be bound to Perkins, aud
did not propose to be thus tied up. The
hestancy of the country Republicans to
subscribe TO Perkins is all based upon the
! complaint voiced by Swisler OF Yolo, that