Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1895-05-02
continued rom rage onsj
TALKED EXEMPTION,

TALKED EXEMPTION,
n,,si lie adoption in preference
Inc scheme proposed.
I" -, held that tue present law was
- sne, The provision proposed was
81 IL PROTECTED the single mau u
uu. t.r extent than II did the married
mau, 81. tt,,, r,,.ssnrIiv
elias thai because Judge Cooley was
,.t constitutional lawyer anu that
Ssd mst with success In Michigan
,',ele he understood conditions lhal
enid do In utah where no didnt
.Tsfstand them. Tue existing cA'
allan law 10 Utah was much beitef
tbln the one propoicd'
FINED LENT
Ev.ps. of Utah, 1fierci su amend
a.tgs follows: every person, the
ts,fof a nmi y, shall nave exempt
S,,p5 execution real estate 20 Tue value
'fsi 500, including u house thereon"
JOINT CONSENT INQUIRED.
r..e,. Of UtAb, offered the follow
.,i,pImoug "a homestead, u7
viJei by law, shall be exempt from
g,s.d sale under any process OF law
'n5sBsIl not be alieuatrd without the
I'igt consent OF husband aud VILE
gErp mat relation cXisif; but no prop
,..y snail DO exempt from sale tor
,.r.s IN i8r tho payment Of obligations
..uifsrttd Tor the purchase Of said
.,r-uissa or iof the erection OF ian.
movements thUfc0u.'
yar'an said ho was unallerably and
gsually opposed 70 fixing Ia tue Con
.tIlton elluor the maximum OF min
,4um on exemption. itshoult b. lott
Bt be Legislature. Exemption laws
Wsfs n very good thing 70 protect home
gWuefs, especially In time Of great fiu-
uuClal distress
nom SCHEMES FAIL.
Tho Evaus ana Greer amendments
were both voted down aud Thereon
m1vsI 10 amcnd BY nGlng exemption
90 any kind " foai estate at tl,bOO.
lEADs Oh rANILirs
vsHan offered the following subsil-
tu,e Tor section .: "Iho Legislature
sbaIl rrsvldr by law Tor the selection
uy heads of iamiliuf, and exemption Of
homestead from sale On execution"
SO WIDOWS ~ San JuAS.
There VIVA surcrabIndauCc Of de.
fltsl.1 on the substitute aud
Hammond additionally when
uf1u0siiion h. gprung by Republican
DO h sufficient TO arouse my suapician
.LsuFhlurl but Tho substitute from Mt
EaraH, the gcntlrnanly gentleman
from Salt Lake, has my hUEgty on.
ddf61mcnt. 10 provides f1r heads OF
.amlles nud us san Juan hagH'. got %
single widow today 10 II satisfied,
ILtughtgrl or course We can't toll
what will happen down that way ~
Vrafr away on In the Willis, among
Nu ludlaut, aud an outbreak might
occur at any time, that would leave
w with more widows than tnofs are IN
-inputr. lLhughtor,) Bui the legii-
slurr Will take caro- 81 lhsm.
40 PROTECT nm HOMESTEAD.
Eyans, Of Weber, announced that 10
hstyBnt " this Natlau Substitute be.
iayyuted down hc would Offer the FOL.
duIug;
Every homestead OF not exceeding
nrly acres OF land aud the dwelling
b.Iau thereon, and the appurtOnaucos,
% ur selected by tie owner
l4sfu1i Ut the opiJu Of thu
gElUf, nuy lot In any city,
T''lngr or recorded town plnls, OF
l.h patta Of lots thereon, and their az
IufluunucrH, ned by any resident 0i
lbu 5lalc, Of at luast tue value Of H..
5Jl, shall be- exempt from forced eale
100 execution OF any other dual pro.
d..
tHgtui alter tue adoption OF this Con-
t,iuuon, Sections may be made from
Ulr Or more parcels OF such lands 10
fuu amount " the sum herein deHig.
mated, Such exemption shall not gN-
tend 70 any mortgage thereon, lawfully
obtained, but such mortgage or other
alienation " such lands, by the owner
thereof, " a married man, shall not be-
valid without the signature Of his wife
% the same"
ThoTgson said no favored the Evans
TiupUtcd amendment, aud James spoke
n behalf OF tho NArinn substitute,
while Mhl0ney ami Cannon looked
With modified Satisfaction ulon tho
Eyanb amendmunL
LIKED az BETTER THAN COOLEY.
ON the suggestion Of Richards, Var
hu amended his substitute 10 read as
'o.lWs, alter which II displaced all
amendments anu the original section
~ dIEwn by Judge Cooley: "rho
Legislature shall provide by law fOt
Tue selection by each head Of "a family
tnl exemption Of homestead OF the
value Oi at least 81 500 from sale ON sx.
empu1u,"
AfIER THE OwNEH's DEATH.
Section providing ioI tue oxsmp.
u3u 2i tho homestead OF a family, after
lHr death Of tho owner thereof, Tor the
lhymrnt of his debts contracted alter
1Ar adoption Of the Constitution, In Rll
cases, dutlug tue minority Of his chi.
uttu, WIS stricken out ~ VIA nlHl sec.
Won which read M follows "lf the
owner VI tho homestead die, leaving
widow but uu children, tue same Rhall
OetAtmpi, anu the Fonts ani profits
lltry0i snail accrue 10 her bpneht dur
llg TIE time Of her widowh8od, unless
,lr be- the owner Of a nomysteaI In
LtT own right"
ACQUIRED BEFORE MARRIAGE.
The final section, also drawn by
allse Cooley, was but slightly amend.
~. vompleIe II Is As lollowG
"l,eal and personal estate Of every
laNhlpt acquired befOFp mnFFluuV ana