The Vermont watchman. [volume] (Montpelier, Vt.) 1883-1911, 1895-05-08
Washington County Court.

SUSAN g. WHITTIER v. o. s. DoDaE, APT.
An action in general assumpsit in which
plaintiff claimed to recover for the balance
of years rent OF slaughter house and use
Of some land. This slaughter house was
closed by order of the authorities of the viii
laye Of Montpelier In July, 1890, The lease
terminated April 1, 1891. Defendant
claimed that under the circumstances he was
gave Judgment for plaintiff for S93.37 and
costs. W. A. Lord for plaintiff; f. L.
Laird for defendant.
GEORGE K. ScRIBNER v. MAUD NJ ScRIB-
NER.-Libel for divorce. Bill granted for
desertion. The petitioner is from Mont
pelier. Defendant made no appearance.
7. r. G )rdon for the petitioner.
ELI CUTLER v. SARAH NJ. CUTLER-Di-
vorce Bill granted for desertion. Petit
toner resides in Barre. John w. Gordon
for petitioner. Defendant made no appear
ance.
MARY j. BIxBy v. WALTER e. BIxBY.-
Divorce. Bill granted for intolerable
severity sew and and refusal Ta to support The par
petitioner. Defendant made no appear
ance.
BERTHA K HoDGDoN v. JAMES G.. HOBO
DoN.-Divorce. The cause alleged was in
tolerable severity and refusal to support
The parties reside in Cabot After hearing
the evidence, this case was continued A.
ID. Kimball for petitioner.
MEARs v. CUMMINs.-Mark Mears ct al.
against w f. Cummins OF al, Bradford
Savings Bank trustee. This action was
brought in general assumpsit to re ;over bal.
ance due on lumber. The question was to
determine the amount of the lumber The
plaintiff, who resides in Marshtield claimed
that each board was measured. Defendant
claimed that his tally did not correspond,
and the difference was eighteen thousand
feet. The case took two days time of the
court last week, but on the coming in of
the court Monday afternoon it was found
that the parties had settled the suit, plaintiff
being allowed a Judgment of $40 and costs,
being the full amount claimed by him. His
attorney was j. P Lamson. Defendants
are from Bradford, and were represented by
j. III. Watson of that place,
MARION E. SANBoRN v. LEROY s. SAN
BORN Libel for divorce. The bill was
granted for assertion. The parties reside in
Northfeld. 7. j. Dewitt for petitioner.
Defendant made no appearance
MINNIE YOUNG v. HARRY A. YoUNG-Bill
OF divorce granted for int lerable severi y
and refusal 70 support. The parties reside
in Montpelier. j. g. Wing for petitioner.
ALMA l. HAMEL v. ALBERT 9. HAMEL.-
Divorce. Petitioner resides in Waterbury,
defendant in Morrisville. Bill granted for
intolerable severity and refusal to support.
Petitioner granted leave TO resume maiden
name of Alma L. Scott Dillingham;, Huse
~ Rowland for petitioner; g. n. Powers Of
Morrisvile for defendant.
ELSIE LINCOLN v. EARL LINcoLN.-Di-
vorce. The parties reside in Mortified
Bill granted for intoerabe severity. Pc.
ii Toner granted leave to resume m alden
name of Elsie Veo. Dillingham;, Huse &
Rowland for petitioner. No appearance by
defendant.
FORSYTH & INGRAM v. MANN BROTHERS.
The parties are from Barre. Plaintiffs, in
January, 1894, were engaged in the business
of who'll sale dealers in granite monuments.
They claim that at that time they con-
tracted with defendants to fill certain job
on a monument by accepting their bid, but,
as defendants did not do the work, they
were compelled to get it done elsewhere at
great loss, and so brought suit in assump-
sit to recover 81 800 The case came on for
trial Tuesday morning and will be on trial
a day or two. w. A. Lord and II. A. Huse
for plaintiffs; G.. W. Wing and j. w. Cor.
don for defendants.