The Evening dispatch. [volume] (Provo, City, Utah) 1891-1895, 1895-03-07
ALIAS

SNUMMONS-IN TIE DISTRICT COURT OF
- the First Judicial District OF the territory
ot Utah, Utah cOun-y.
The Anglo American Loan, Mortgage "a geucy
Co., Limited, OF London, Il corporation, plain
till, VS.. Thomas L. Earl and HARRIET T.. Earl,
his wife, The Lombard Investment com Dany.
u corporation, and Milton b. Whitney, Charles
). EaIrCnlld, Harry Il Mooney, Sanford B..
Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers of The
Lombard Investment company, defendants
Ine People of tie territory OF Utah send
greeting to Thomas T. Earl ana Harriett E.
Earl, his wife, The L0mtard Investment COM
pany, d corporation. and Milton b, Whitney,
Charles ). tdirchiId, Harry Il. btOOney, San
lord B. Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers
OF Inc LOmbard IuYe5CmenU company, de-
PENDANTS.
You are hereby required to appear in an ac-
tiUn brought against you by the GDOYe named
plaintiff, IN the district court OF the First Ju-
ulcial district Of the territory Of Utah, and to
answer the complaint tiIed therein, within ten
days exclusive oi the day OF serviCeJ after the
service on you OF this summOns-if served
within this county; or if served out OF this
C unGy, but III tins district, within twenty
days; otherwise within forty days - or
judgment by default viii be taken against
you, according TO prayer of this CONG plaint,
The said Hcti0nis brought to obtain q decree
OF Uhis court against the defendants herein for
the sum Of 81 ,7U2,10, with interest at IL Der
cent. per annum, from the lst day of January,
a. ID, 1893, until paid, and Tor ol5OOO attorney
fees. and for COSTS OF SUIT. Plaintiff alleges
that on the 4th daY OF March, l6JU, Thomas E.
and Harriet Il, Earl, his wife executed and
delivered 10 The Lombard Investment com
pany q certain bond III the SUM OF $4,000,
with per cent. interest per annum, with IL
per cent. after maturity. That TWO of said
coupons have not been paid and that the same
with the principal has been declared due and
payable. That on March 2lst, 1880. the said
Lombard Co. sold and assigned the said note
to plai.-titf who is now the lGga holder there
OF. and did then snd there guarantee the pay
ment OF the within note ana principal within
two years from SAID last mentIOl ed date. That
the usual decree may be made for the sale OF
the said promises to pay said debt, interest,
costs ana attorney ices, that the proceeds OF
SAFE may be applied in pay ment of the amount
due plRintf, and that said defendants and
each of them and all persons claiming under
them or either OF them subsequent to the exc
cuton OF said mortgage upon said premises,
either as purchasers, enCumbrancers or other
wise, may be barred and foreclosed of ali
right, claim, or equity of redemption in said
premises and every par thereof, and that the
said plaintiff may have judgment and eXecu-
tlon against the said defendants Thomas +.
Earl and Harriett Il. Earl and The Lombard
Investment company, for any deficiency
which may remain after applying the pro-
ceeds OF sale.
For fuller particulars see copy of complaint
on file.
to appear and answer the said complaint as
above required, the said plaintiff will apply
to the court for the relief therein demanded,
and COSTS of suit
Witness the Hon William King, judge, !
and the seal OF the District court OF
the First judicial district in and for
lsEALl tDe territory OF Y tan; t1is l5tn day
Of February, i'll the year of OurLOr1 |
one thousand eight hundred and |
ninety-hYe,
j. w, BEAsLEY, Clerk.
BY GEO. HAvERCAMP, Deputy Clerk,
James A. Williams, attorney for plaintiff.