The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1895-10-12
SUMMONS.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND
for the Third Judicial district OF Utah
territory, county of Salt Lake. James ?.
Freeze, plaintiff VS.. John Reading, Annie
Reading, Amos ". Butler, j. M. Stout,
and A. B. Jones, J: e. Vaughn, r l..
Hutchinson. Henry M. Sanborn apd Utah
National Bank. a corporation, defendants
Summons. The people of the territory
CT Utah send greeting, to John, Reading.
Annie Reading. Amos w. Butler, j. NJ.
Stout and A. 3. Jones, ]. {. Vaughn.
r. L. Hutchinson, Henry NJ. Sanborn and
Utah National Bank, a corporation, de-
fendants You are hereby 9eq I i5st to to
BY the above named plaintiff in the dis
trict court of the Third judicial district,
the complaint filed therein within ten
days, Exclusive of the day Of service)
after the service on you of this sum
r.ons-if, served. within this county or,
district within twenty days; otherwise
within forty days-or judgment by de
to the prayer OIL said compliant The SAID
action is brought to have Judgment
against defendant John Reading. on four
causes of action, as follows, to-wit: list
fO- 81 600 with interest from February
14th 1895 at 10 per cent. per annum, for
500 attorneys fees. alleged TO be due On
a certain promlssory note executed by
said defendant to defendant a. w. But
ler. Nov 14th, 1891. for. coo with interest
from date at ID per cent. per annum,
same being due and wholly unpaid save
interest to Feb. 18th. 1879, and being Sc
cured by a mortgage of even date on
nJemiseS first hereinafter described exc
etfted by said defendant Reading to said
Butler; End. in sum of $1,000 with interest
- 10 per cent. per arnurn from Feb. 1st.
1895 and 800 attorneys fee against de-
PENDANTS Reading; alleged TO be due on
a certain promiSSory note executed by
said defendant John Reading to said But
Ter Feb. J. 1892 for 8, GOO with interest
from date at 10 per cent. per annum, same
being due and wholly unpaid save inter-
est to Feb. l. 1895. and being secured by
mortgage of even date on premises sec
ondly Hereinafter described, executed by
defendants Reading TO said Butler: Srd
for SO eco with interest ut Z per cent. per
annum from Feb. 10, 1894, and $50 attOr-
news fees, alleged to be due on IL Ger
tain promiSsory note executed by defend
ants Reading to plaintiff. Feb. 10th, 1892.
per cent. per annum, sarne being due
ard wholly unpaid save interest to Feb
10th, 1894. and being secured by a mort
gage of even date on premises thirdly
hereinafter described executed by de-
PENDANTS Reading to J. M. Stout and A.
p. Jones; 4th, in the sum of $l.40C with
mum from April 9th. 1892 for 800 attor-
ney's fees and costs of suit, alleged TO be
due on a certain promissory note exc
cuted by defendants Reading to plain
tiff April 9th. 1891, for $1.400 with inter
est from date at II per. cent. per annunn
same being due and wholly unpaid save
cured by. a mortgage of even date on
premises hereinafter fourthly described
executed
tiff, the notes and mortgages in first
two causes of action herein mentioned
having been duly assigned TO plaintiff
who is now the owner and holder There
of; to have a decree of foreclosure for
the sale of all of said premises, adiulg-
ing that proceeds of said sale be applied
in payment of amounts found due plain
tiff as above: that defendants ana all
persons claiming under them be barred
and foreclosed of all claim or equity
of redemption in said premises: that
plaintiff have a deficiency Judgment
against defendants Reading and FOR other
relief. Said premises are described as
point rods east from northwest corner
of lot 5, block 50. plat, AZ Salt Lake
City Survey, lunplnS thence east AZ
Az feet; thence north 8 rods to begin
! ring. situate in Salt Lake city and
county Utah: End, beginning at a point
lot s, block So. Plat A. Salt Lake CITY
Survey, thence east Az feet; thence
rorth 8 rods to beginning, situate in Salt
Lake city and county, Utah. 3rd. Part of
lot 5, block So, plat "a" Salt Lake City
Survey, commencing at a point rods
east of the northwest corner of said lot,
running thence cast 215 rods. thence
south rods, thence west 2k rods:
| part of lot 8. said block So, plat -, f"
| commencing at a point 2l2 rods south Of
! the northeast corner of said lot. run
nlng thence south 2,z rods, thence west
| 20 rods, thence north 212 rods, thence
east 20 rods to beginning situate in Salt
Lake city and county. Utah 18th, the
south Il of the north u of lot 8. block
81. plat "a" Salt. Lake City Survey,
| situate in Salt Lake city and county,
! Utah. And you are hereby notified that
| If you fail to appear and answer the
said complaint as above required, the
said plaintiff viii apply 10. the court for
| the relief demanded therein.
Witness the Hon. Samuel A BIer-
rift, judge, and the. seal OF. the
district court o. the Third Judicial
of Utah, this 4th day of Septem-
Der. in the year of our Lord one
thousand eight hundred and ninety
FIVE. DAVID 2. DUNBAR
! By GEO. D. LOOMIS, Clerk.
Deputy Clerk
James H. Moyle. attorney for plaintiff.