The Evening dispatch. [volume] (Provo, City, Utah) 1891-1895, 1895-04-22
ALIAS


Summons (under amended complaint.)
AIUMMUNS-IN TIE DISTRICT COURT OF
- the First judicial District of the territory
OI Utah, u tah coun y.
The Anglo American Land Mortgage &Agency
Co., Limited, OF London, corporation, piain-
titf vs. Thomas h. Karl and Harriet E. Earl,
his wife, The Lombard Investment company,
q corporation, and Milton Is. whitney, Charles
s. FaiCchild, Harry Mooney, Sanford b.
Lad and Frank hagerman, receivers oil Tne
Lombard Investment company, defendants.
The People OF the territory OF Utah send
greeting to Thomas f. Earl and HarrietU E.
Earl, his wife, The Lombard Investment COM
pany, corporation. and Milton B, Whitney,
Charles 5. Falrchild, Harry T.. Mooney, SAN
ford B. Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers
Of The Lombard Investment company, de-
PENDANTS.
You are hereby required to appear in an ac-
ton brought against you by the aboye named
plaintiff, In the district court OF the First Ju-
dicial district OF the territory of Utah, and to
answer the complaint hleo therein, within ten
days exclusive OF the day OF servIce) alter the
service ON you OF this suminons-n served
within this county; or il served out OF this
county, but in TINS district, within twenty
days; otherwise within forty days or
Judgment by default viii be taken against
you, according to prayer of this complaint,
The said actionis brought to obtain d uecree
of this court against the defendants herein for
the sum of 81, 1870, with interest at IL per
cent. per annum, from the 1st day OF January,
a. ID, 1895, until paid, and for Sl5UUU attorney
fees. and for COSTS OF suit. Plaintiff alleges
that ON the 4th day of March, 1891, Thomas f.
and Harrlett n, Earl, his wife. executed ana
delivered TO The Lombard Investment COM
pany certain bond III the sum of 81, 5000,
with per cent interest with annum, per IL
per cent. after maturity That two OF said
coupons have not been paid and that the same
Win the principal has been declared due and
payable. That on March 2lst, 1880. the SAID
Lombard Co. sold and assigned the said note
to plalHtih. VINO is now the l0ga holder there |
OF, and did then and there guarantee the pay
ment of the within note and principal within |
two years from said last mentlo. ed date. Uhat |
the usual decree may be made for the sale OF |
the said premises to pay said dept, interest, |
CUSts anu attorney lees, tnat the proceeds OF |
SAFE may DO applied i'll paY ment OF the amount |
due plaintiff, ana that eaid delendans and |
each OF them ana all persons claiming under |
them or either OF them subsequent TO The exc
cutiOn of SaId mortgage upon saIi premises |
either as purchasers, encumn nrancers or other |
wise, may be barred ana foreclosed of all |
right, claim, 81 equity OF redemption i'll said |
premises and every par thereof, and that the |
said plaintiff may have Judgment and execu- I
hari and Harriet Il. Earl ana The Lombard |
Investment company, for any deficiency !
which may remain after applying the pro-
leeds OF sale.
For fuller particulars see copy of complaint
IN file.
And you are hereby notified that if you fail
o appear and answer the said complaint as
.bove required, the said plaintiff Will apply
o the court for the relief therein demanded,
nd costs of suit
witness the Hon. William II. King, Judge,
and the seal Of the District court of
the First JUDICIAL district in aud for
IsEALl the territory OF Utah; this 18th day
OF March, in the year OF ourLord
one thousand eight hundred and
ninety-hVe,
j. W. BEAsLEY. Clerk.
By GEo. HAYERCAMP, deputy Clerk.
James n. Williams, attorney for plaintiff.