Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1895-06-05
nd SUPREME COURT.
~, Cases Argued Before Tha'
August Boiy Today
.ar nrRlDuSg" LIBEL sun


u,,. three cases argued and
lp''. 4, the Supreme court today
q which all Of the JUICES "''' a. "
lsudaner' .,..,
=, IN, matter u tho estate OF H. u
~ Js,,ased. y. p. Wells, admin
m'.' respondent and appellant vs.
h' R.lly Of al, petitioners and TO-
".u ls,t,. appeal from tue Fourth dis
~. JUICE miner pre'idins' II, H.
u'7 i, attorney Tor appellant; Neis
I sa..n aud T. D. johnson for r''Pohd'
co, ~. o,,sbsr 90, 1909, Henry q.
vi, died In Box Elder county, Utah,
.,,g alani personal estate there.
on November 10 administration
s,daly gtanled to David T. Wells ~
'.,,,,,,, court Of Box Elder county,
ps tbo sams day died his bonds ln
mot $4,000. On FEBRUARY IL
ID T.. Wells filed ~ additional
H., siDl. On October IL, 1873 4.
@w,li, and John Kelly pntit ionel
% r,ebale court 10 remove d. l..
IN. t,5m the administration, charg'
vsst,. nismanagomont ifauui
s '.sipst him. The court made ~
-, an October gStd, suspending the
.,grf. OF u. II. Wells ne admih's'ta-
md for citation ~ issue Tor MIN
4 speoar November ", lsO', nnu
.og cause why he should not TO 70.
.sveI. Two citations we've lssuel
- ,riurgpd IS thu ahofiil that adj
Hi.h,fator could not be- ioun1 with
y. hi county. On October .Bin tire
"a ofi,rgi "thnt = nBw citation be
.,fl,hsd once week Tor four succo'-
IL. weeks IN the Brigham City
,.,,sr In lied Oi personal notice."
G5 November 27lh the court made
,..gIgf releasing Two Of thn eurrtieH
IN. l.. Wells, aud ordered his re-
~.ysl au1 the appointment OF John
Kelly o. admiuislrnloI ..
Auauptal was taken 20 the district
,su, Toe appellant holding that taid
,,s,fwa without JuTlsdictiOn OF the
,,a6n Of said AdminihItatot, and the
,5ilsc, matter OF said .proccoling, be-
M, no psfeonal service Of citation
eileen made on Wells, aud that the
u-.iiutei service was void because u
N. u8t Published for the length VI
Ice sud il the paper designated.
Thp lover court dismissed tho appeal
pm5li0n VI krlly's counsel, anu mn
ftssl was therefore taken 10 the
HlNme Court
TRIBUNE LIBEL CASE,
TIE afsumcnt Ia the cAse Of AIMS
't,u,lefmakvr, plaintlil anu appel
isi, W tue Tribune Publishing com
Any, ielp dauts aud TtrpOudeLt u, were
lea tpsuu. The appeal II token
t5m the itcision VI Judge RIrich In
. Thifd 4istfic'. Tue attorneys ff
gpellani are jar. A. Williams AM
suu 81. Zane, AMI o. W. Powers, ID.
N.slnup auI MiGer y Hiles appear
gftt'pJlaen'.
Thn wasasuit Tor libel brought by
FtIhiietmakvr agains. the Tribune
hh nhlng company for publishing M
al Gle charging theFefntt rmaketia lam
vs. with carving forth from thei
bgne little Car linz Hansen upon tn,
fy0gle tustft, with thu procOnCeiyet
it,ign that there she might perish o
huoger aud exposure" Appellant
SIX that the Judgment OF the lowe
eJuh be- cot rside and that u new
uAl 10 granted.
HOLT VI PEARSON.
The last cnso argued was that o
!otph Holt, plaintiff ana respondent
UChaT.ts T., Pearson, uoieuuant auI
APPELLANT. Tue appeal l. taxed from
TOE Ihlrd dlslflCt, G.H, Barton, iudg,
RID, Winters appears ivr responder
tld 81. ". kglghn Tor the appellant.
Ths 10 an action brought by 70
il1nIeng 10 recover from appellant tn
tsm Of ,2ls Is, which II II alleged
ipfe.hnt, 10 Muy, 1891, received from
ie'p5ndent anu u other persons
th.m u Is claimed have assigned thei
claims 70 tuspOndrnt-in excess o
lscss'afy charges anu expenses OF Oh
hnng deeds Tor some forty lots o
hAd situated In u boulevard twelv
iois In width which Heretofore hE,
huounded the city OF BOuniiful ii
DAVIS county, anu Oi watch lott
IiAlnIll alleges himself anu his assign
WhNefe The owners, IL II alleged tina
Nft'lhnl, Ia collecting said money
hpItseulel that no was the agent o
mgpi5bato cguft ot said county. Tn
'a. was brought In t0hRlf OF .
eAmlulsi tut on trial WAS dismisse
NO i've OF them. On the others ID
KY lyuul iUr plaintiff IA the SUN q
N0-lil, The defendant moved fdr
Ne" ltlali which was 0v0rIulel aGd u
ipeai taken.
Appellant asks that tie juIgmuI
ll4 ofdet % tho district court DC r,
,thel anu the case remunded wit
gl'cJOn to enter judgment IN favor
"''auan'-no CAUSE Ut action.
CASE DISMISSED.
he case " the Mammoth Mimi
~ plaintiff, Va Juab county and /
,NeIunei defendants, was III miss,
WyAu,e NO Undertaking ON appeal 4
.,lenlauls has boon filed anu that
S,.uhel copy Of tho transcript hi
ADMITTED 10 the BAR.
Mm' f. Davis, Of Montana, was n
ol 10 practice at the bar u Il
J HE,eAo court, on the motion Of J.
|M -=~-==
81 MtfgtNt ,rov,