The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1895-02-19

HEARD IN court.
Joseph Tanning on Trial for Non.
Support OF His Wife.

Before Mr.. Justice Wilbur today, the
case OF the City OF Providence against
Joseph Tanning for the non-support OF
his wife, Celia +. Tanning. on is trial. The
testimony developed woeful amount OF
claiming that Mrs. Fanning's
conduct was OF most
unbecoming nature and the wife making
counter charges OF similar character.
tanning further says that he had no work
and was unable TO support his wife Ray
mond q. Mowry appears for the plaintiff
and Page Il Owen for the defendant.
Leander Capwcll was found guilty yes
terday afternoon OF assault upon Henry
Hudson.
Before Mr.. Justice Rogers the case OF
Joseph p. Manton VS.. John B. Goodwin Is
being tried. The action is to recover
the balance of 200 which the
complainant claim TO have loaned to de-
fendant. Manton was formerly the
agent OF the Chase Elevator and Manton
Windlass Company, and the defendant
AYERS that he was employed TO assist
the complainant In selling the goods OF
the company and that the 200 given him
was in payment of services. 1t is further
claimed that this contract was personal
one between Manton and Goodwin. Q. r..
Champlin appears for the plaintiff and +.
T.. Arnold ior the defendant.
D. In the suit OF Maria Grimes VS.. Rosay
Grimes ct al, the jury found a verdict in
the affirmative upon the issues submitted.
Appellate Division.
The suit OF George q. Bontly against
Henry 4. Root q Sons was heard today
before the judges. The contest is in rela-
tion to the respondents right 10 use
certain gangway. f.. Il. Parkhurst and
Clarke n Johnson for complainant and
&. A. Aldrich and X. T.. Lyman for the de-
fendant.
1893. Charlotte L. Farrar VS.. William
Beckman. Attorncys-D. j. Holland for
PLAINTIFF; Page & Owen for defendant.
1886. Elizabeth A. Smith, administra-
tor, vs.. Joseph w. Smith. Attorneys
Page & Owen for plaintiff; Il. f. West for
defendant.
57l6. N. Y. & N. f. r. r. Company vs..
William M. Harris. Attorneys Miner q
Rocker and j. NJ. Ripley for plaintiff; ID.
Is. Potter for defendant.
1883. John Jenckes VS.. Henry G. Clark.
Attorneys-W. Is. Vincent for plaintiff;
j. NJ. Ripley for defendant.
967. Dante Regali VS.. John Caproni,
Attorneys-G. j. West for plaintiff; X.
w. Burbank and Page Owen for de-
fendant.
96s. Augusta Ferrari VS.. Same. Attor-
neys-Same as in 967.
-. William III. King pro ami VS..
George Gordon King. Attorneys-W. @.
Rocker for defendant.
Sixth District Court.
Poal Matekian, who was arrested Jan.
%, for shooting John O'Neil on Pine
street, had his trial this morning and the
evidence was sufficient to bind him over
TO the Court of Common Pleas in the sum
of 800.
John McNamarn, who was charged with
making an assault on Mary Fitzgerald
Jan. "a, was discharged for the want of
evidence.
Arthur McDuff, alias Charles T.. McDer.
mott, a well known thief, was bound over
TO the Court of Common Pleas in the sum
of $500 for breaking into the house OF
Isaac Rose and stealing shoes.
John Dolau was fined So and costs for
stealing chickens from Samuel Pike.
harry Gray, Ben Connors and William
McGuilin, were charged with liquor
nuisance sales and were bound over to the
Court of Common Pleas.
Mary Riley and John O'Brien were
adjudged insane and sent to Cranston.
William McGuilpin was bound over on
the charge of maintaining a nuisance and
for one conviction Of keeping liquor for
sale and two for selling. He was sentenced
TO 10 days in Jail and to pay fine of $50
ana costs.
Calendar for February 20.
The calendar OF the Supreme Court for
Wednesday is as follows:
Common Pleas Divislon)
60s3. Francis McCahey VS.. Peckham
Brothers ct al. Attorneys-S. T. Douglas for
plaintiff; u. O. Slocum for defendant
1870. Samuel ID. keene VS.. Edmund 5. Hop
kins. Attorneys-Page q Owen for plaintiff;
Il. VI. Bosworth for defendant.
2l2. Edward Qunlan vs. J. Falrbrother ct
el executor. Attorneys--H. J. Carroll for
plaintiff; Comstock & Gardner for defendant.
lli9. Jacob Goldstein vs. Samuel Priest
Attorneys--Page a. Owen for plaintiff; J. j.
McGill for defendant
1891. Globe National Bank vs. American
Wood Paper Company. Attorneys Berkes
for plaintiff; Tillinghast and A. Greene for de-
fendant.
lq47. Hago5 Bogigisn vs.. sarkis II. Nahi-
gian. Attorneys-R. w. Burbank for plain
till; for defendant.
appellate Division.)
1888. Catherine Agan VS.. Patrick Agan ct.
OIL Attorneys-H. j. Carroll for plaintiff; A.
j. Cushing for defendant.
$685. Thomas II. Early a. Co. W.. James VI.
Corcoran. Attorneys-T. L. Murphy for
plaintiff w. III. Barney for defendant.
374T: Catherine Il. Ryder VS.. James j. Ry-
der, ct al. Attorneys-G. J. West for plain
tiff; Van Slyck q Mumford, J. +. Lonsdale,
j. Padien for defendant.
1900. J.J. Arnold VS.. Pawtuxet Valley Water
Works. Attorneys-Arnold for plaintiff; ID.
Il. Potter for defendant.
2. James Fournier VS.. James Wilson. At
torneys- Joseph Osfeld for plaintiff; IA. J.
Carroll for defendant.
Warren Happenings.