The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1895-10-02
70 RECOVER ASSETS.
psnk Receiver Church Sues
County Treasurer Mish.
UNIV AN EVERETT BANK FAILED
III Estate and Notes Wanted Back
M,Canns Plead Not Guiity-A
Plea for Divorce.
uow AN EVERETT BANK FAILED

r. Church. receiver % the Puget
e.sns National bank. Of Everett. is after
u.sllsarn NJ. Mish, treasurer OF Snoho-
- county and In complaint filed in
r..1~e uanford's court he makes some
s.ss-.ssre allegations of fraud and eolIu-
- as between the county treasurer and
80 aficers OF the bank. Mr.. Church has
ssvun two suits against Mish. one for
- recovery OF real estate In Mason
I'D whateon counties. alleged TO have
go srauduientIy obtained. and the other
e. the recovery OF eighteen promissory
.n.ss valued at SIS. $50, and .5oa0 damages.
n his suit f0r the recovery Of the real
..sata Receiver Church says the bank
tecan1e insolvent on August 7. 1876. and
,haf ne was appointed receiver On July
r the bank was the owner of eighty
.eres OF land in Whatcom county and 100
.~-eS I'm Mason county, The complaint
e. that on July Is. and for some time
,rof 10 that date, the bank was indebt-
"A "a Nish In the sum OF S23, 3d. % in an
oueu account. due upon demand. and to-
.sIfv unsecured On July Is. being unable
.o,meet its obligations. the bank ceased
- do business. and on July II all the bust
rsss and assets OF the bank were turned
sger 10 the comptroller OF the currency.
n is alleged that on the next day, after
he control Of the affairs Of bank had
hank BY it's officers and agents. wrong
f,iiy. unlawfuily and fraudulently made
snd delivered 70 W. 81. Aiish deeds of
conveyance 10 the lands described. with
the intent 20 fraudulently secure the debt
- MIgh. and that Mish accepted them
with the full knowledge that the bank
vas insolvent II is also claimed that
the deeds bear date OF July IS. but in fact
were made. executed and delivered on
"a that he
real estate Is an asset OF the bank. and
,hat the title and ownership should be
vested in the bank for the benefit of all
TIE creditors
Receiver Church's other suit against
County Treasurer Nish Is for the recov-
cry Of proznissory notes. The complaint
saws that the bank was on July IL. and
il now, tie owner Of certain promissory
notes, which were wron9fully taken by
Mlsh from It. The notes are described
wlth their dates as follows:
September ~. 1891. by NJ. $. Lindsay.
for SIS with interest ar L per cent
March II. 1895. by John F.. McManus.
for $3.50. interest II per cent
July J. 1885. George l.. Hart. s2s5. interest
L per cent
June Is. 1895. r. Bast. $500. interest Il
per cent.
June IS. 1895. f. Rast. two of sl.Ooo each.
interest II per cent.
June Is. 1895. $3.50. interest Il per cent.
May 3. 1886. Samuel III. Nichols, $3.50, in
teresf u per cent.
April g 1885, William NJ. Mish. $500. paid
$50 interest IL per cent.
April q. 1895. l.. *. Church. 81 900. inter
est IL per cent.
April e. 1895, L. *. Church. $780, inter
est IL per cent.
May 70. 1888. @. NJ. Galligan. $50. inter
est Il per cent
September T. 1885, J. II. Savage, sl.250.
paid $780, interest II per cent.
September 10. 1894. Joseph r. Lentzy,
fsS. paid $40. interest 10 per cent.
July Is. is5. Sumner Iron Works. $500.
interest IL per cent
June Il. 1855 Sumner Iron Works, two
OF S.500 each. interest IL per cent.
June II. isa5, Sumner Iron Works. 1000,
Interest II per cent.
June =. 1895. W. g. Taylor, $500. inter
EST Il per cent.
October s. 1894. Alexander Alderman. SO.
interest II per cent