The Evening dispatch. [volume] (Provo, City, Utah) 1891-1895, 1895-04-19
ALIAS

A
Summons (under amended cOmplaint.)
| AIUMMUES-lN TIE DISTRICT COURT OK
| y the First Judicial District of the territory
| OF Utah, UIah COun y.
Co.. Limited, Ot London, Il corporation, plain
| Iiff, VS., Thomas E. earl ana Harriet b. Earl
/ MS wife, The lombard Investment company
! a corporation, and Milton b. whitney, ChaTles
| 5. FaIcchild, Harry f Mooney, SANFORD b.
| Laid and Frank Hagerman, receivers oil Inc
Lombard Investment com pany, defendants.
The People OF the territory Oh Y tan send
| Earl, his wife, The Lombard Investment com
| pany, q corporation. and Milton Is, Whitney,
| Charies s. Fairchild, Harry h. Mooney, San
| ford B Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers
| Of The Lombard lnYesUmenU company, de-
| PENDANTS.
| You are hereby required to appear in an ac-
| tiOn brought against you by the aoOYe named
plaintiff III the district cOur5 oI the First Ju-
uicial district OF the territory OF Utah, ana 10
| answer the complaint hleu therein, within ten
days exclusive OF the day OF serylcel alter the
service on you OF This sulnnons-lI served
within this county; or II served out OF this
county, but i'll TINS district, within twenty
days; otherwise within forty days - or
Judgment by deIault will be taken against
you, according TO prayer OF this com pIaInC,
The said actionis brought 10 obtain decree
| of this court against the defendants hereln Tor
| the sum of Sl,IUZ.IO, with interest at IL per
cent. per annum, from Jhe LIST day OF January,
A, ID, 1898, until paid, ami Tor l5U.UU attorney
fees and for COSTS OF sult. Plaintiff alleges
| that ON the 4th day OF March, 1881, 1holdaS L.
and Harriett E. Earl his vile, executed ana
delivered 10 The Lombard Investment COM
pauy q certain bond III the sum Oh 5I.6UU.t u,
with per cent. interest with annum, per IL
per cent. after maturity That two OF SAID
coupons have not been paid and that tn5 same
with the principal mas bsen declared due ana
,.aygbe. That on March Zlst, loJG, the said
Lombard Co sold and assigned the -sald note
TO plaiAtitf, who is now the Iega holdef there
OF, and did then ana there guarantee the pay
m q
two years from said last mentIos ed date. IhaJ
the usual decree may be made for the sale OF
the said premises TO pay SAID ueDC, interest,"
COSIs ana attorney ices, that the proceeds Ol
SAFE may DO applied i'll paj Lnent vi the amount
due plalnun, ana that 6alQ ue!CuudutS anu
each of them and all persons claiming under
them or either OF them subsequent 10 the exc
cution of sand mortgage upon sad premises
either as purchasers, encum pranc2rs or otaer-
wise, may be barred and fOreclOsed OF all
right, claim, 4 equity OF redemption IN said
premises and every par thereof, and that the
said plaintiff may have judgment and eXecu-
tion against the sad defendants Thomas +.
earl ana HARRIET Il. Earl and Ihe Lombard
Investment company, fOr any deficiency
which may remain aTter applying the pro-
Ceeds Ot sale.
For fulier particulars see copy of complaint
on file.
And you are hereby notified that if you fail
to appear and answer the said complaint as
above required, the said plaintiff viii apply
10 the court for the relief therein demanded,
and COSTS of SUE
Witness the don. William H King, judge,
and the seal Of the district court OF
the Fiist judicial district in and Tor
IsEALl the territory OF Utan; this 10th day
OF March, in the year of ourLord
one thousand eigtG hundred and
ninety-ive,
J. W, BEAsLEY. Clerk.
By GEO. HAYERCAMP, Deputy Clerk.
James A W iliiams, attorney for plaintiff.