Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1895-11-26
NoN-JuRY CIVIL DOCKET.
II VIII Come Up In the County Court
Friday.

Following ia the setting OF the nom
jury civil docket In the county court,
beginning Friday and continuing eight
days:
Friday, November 29.--I.. b. Embrey
vs.. CANNON Coal company; ]. S. Nell
son g. Son Shoe company VS.. s. Nj.
Fry, gar; w. II. Wood & Co. VS.,
$; NJ. Fry. gar; Johnson & Muir
I. Burt & Co. VS.. s. NJ. Fry, gar;
NJ r. Bewley VS., Gulf. Colorado and
santa Fe Railway company: T.. r..
smith VS.. w. j. Ayres: f.. Il. Smith VS..
W J. Ayres; Bessie Phllibert VS.. A. NJ.
McKillen; Stratton a. White vs.. r. n.
Bradford ct al; Bancroft, Whitney &
co. VS.. u. +. Ayres: American Starch
company We. r. w. Roach, gar:
a. II. Davidson VS.. John c. Ryan: The
Mrs. c. IL. King company VS.. S. q.
Tomlinson, gar; Collins q Arm
st ong VS.. j. NJ. Dickson, John A
Jones vs.. City National bank, gar;
d; {. Trigg vs. Knight. Stith G. Nc
Michael; a. q. Spaldlng & Bros. VS..
w. u. Newly, gar; Il. S. Houston
vs. Henry seiber; McLaury 4 Albright
vs. H. NJ. Reed ct al; Arch Earl vs.
George /. slocum; ]. T, Jamison vs.. Il.
r. smith; Robert Fitzgerald VS.. a.
Canto; j. II. Smith ct al. vs. Thomas
Leach ct al; w. II. Moore w. Evans.
Snider-B uel company; Grimm &c Runge
vs. a. II. Mlgnon; Ed Simpson VS.. ID
Mccormick * Co.; NJ. W. Barber W.
v :. Wardlaw; stratton & White vs.
L. f.. London ct al; Stratton & White
vs.. Il. s. Martin ct al; Stratton &
white VS.. Sylvester Armstrong ct al.
Stratton & White vs. C. Il, Winters az
al; Stratton 81 White VS. Il. II. Maxon
ct al; Fort Worth Implement company
vs. W,;,i NJ ., banner ct al; j. r. Joyce VS.
Afford Woodbury. VS.. f.. Smith ct nj.
opPenheimer Bros. & VeIth Va. r. nm,
now; u. Is. Finney VIZ. the II q r ~
Ky Co; ], s. Nelson &: son Shoe ~
Va, 5. q. Tomllnson, Gar: b W Cann
vs.. Pecos Land and Cattle ca. ct al.
., - lrderriden n Co. We. Chss civ
.. me-. IT.; Irummon1 ioba c, Co. We. G
Slhoehio, TT; w. r. FillotsDn vs.. J. 81
cross; W Il. Fillotson Va, J. : cross
Z 8. Ferrel Va. T. q p. R'y Co. Teras
Brewing Co. VS.. Chas. Wertzner Of al.
mas Maikle VS.. D. Boaz ct al: Rose.
man q Levy VS.. T. K. ThreadcilI, SI5.
ney y. carson ct al, VS.. Morgan Tones
e. az. Hess. siegel G Co. rs. Fort
NORM national Bank; Alex Canto IS
nurn r. wilson ct al; ]. Lewis q Co
Is r. r. a, Euless, sheriff, II. w. Barrett
levitt vs. W, A, McCutchen Of NJ.
John Woodland VS. Galloway 4 kali.
q: r Chrismun vs. FIT W. q
Ky Co.; Fort Worth National banI -.
prev Pruitt ct al; NJ. NJ. Jones va
u Sonley ct al; Empire Grain 90 ~
: > nNNkine q Co; Il, NJ. Dagga,, ~,
g., 2. & 3. R'y Co Fe,zer, g sro vs.
W, II Harbeck; David White va p
roster ct al, Martini Brown CO We r
+. Green; A. r. Gillenwaters Va Cav,
eron Nj. and 2. Co: Wapless I,a,,nr
Grocer Co, vs.. ". c. Bostlck q, ~.
NAPLES Platter Grocer ca. vs ca,
Campbell. Gar; r. j. Weston Va T
POWELL PIN +, Chapel vs.. MAY Fiser
ct al; II. u. Cells VS.. Fort yrns,r
stock Yards Co; wapIea. plnttor S,.n
Ger Co. vs.. Foster & Co: wapies p,s ~
Gro er Co. VS.. N. d. Guile ~ q, ~
J; II. joyce vs. II, c Hodell (. r..
i Fort Worth & Utica TT. CO. Va. W
Monday. December &c. G. G II
ny 20 VS.. TT. w. & NJ n ~.
Co; Dickson. Deaton & Co. w r, w
4 d. c. G. R'y Co. Of nj. Iain ".
sm9ot vs. Tex. & Pac. Coal az
Emerson ct al. Va. Manchesta,. n M,
,ns. So,' N. p. Anderson II al ys ' NY
Merehants Ins. Co.; N. p. a,da.s me
- a.. vs.. Springfield ms. CO. W
harper W. Tex. 8 Pnc. R'y CO. X e.