The Democratic advocate. [volume] (Westminster, Md.) 1865-1972, 1895-07-13
OF PUBLICATION
NO. 1865 EQUITY.
In the Circuit Court for Carroll County.

In the Circuit Court for Carroll County.
Emma Susan Dieets, vs. Margaret Dieets
(widowl and others.
The object of the Bill in this case is to pro.
cure decree tor the sale of the real estate OF
John f. Dieets. late of Carroll county de-
ceased. to pay his debts uuSatis6ed by his per.
Soual estate.
The Bill states in substance that the said
John f. DieetS died in Carroll county. Mary
land. on the 4th of December. 1894, leaving
a last will and testament. which was admitted
to probate by the Orphans Court of said
county on the 24th of December. 1894, and
letters testamentary on the testatOrS estate
were granted on the same day to Edward L..
Wine. of said county. the executor by sand
will appointed That testator by said viii
beaueathcd portion of his personal property,
apprliSed at $40 50, To his widow. Margaret
Dieets. absolutely. and 10 his daughter. said
Emma :. Directs; the Plaintiff, another por-
ton appraised nj S27. 50, and ordered the
residue thereof. appraised Al SSl.5o TO he
sold 10 pay debts and expenses. That said
executor has sold all the personal property of
the tcStator. including the portions bequeathed
10 said widow and daughter Is aforesaid. to
be applied to the payment of expenses and
debts of the teStatoT. and returned to sand
Orphans Court a list of said sales. amount
ing to S24l.15. which Is believed 90 be the
full extent of all the personal estate of testa-
tor. That teStator owned AZ his death some
real estate. 10 Wit 4 small farm. containing
}2 acres, Rood and 10 percheS of land. stu
ated in Manchester district, Carroll county.
which he directed In his viii to be disposed
ofas iullows-lle requested that his SAID widow
should remain living thereon during her HE
or widowhuod. and should have ali the pro
cccd~ of his said farm during said time: but
should keep said farm clear of all debts and
expense, during said time. including Interest
uu single bin for $4,000 be- owed her for
his wife own money borrowed by him. And
he further directed iu SAID will that after the
death OF marriage OF his said widow all his
real estate should be- sold los his executor and
after paving legacy ct $1,000 20 his ,aJj
daughter the Plaintiff. be- directed that all
the rest aud residue of his estate shua'd be
equally divided among Iii, siX children. viz F:
John ". Dipct~, o.! York county. Peuu>ylva-
mia. William II. DiCy,>, Of York county. Pa;
Mary Ann K. FriiuEcr. wife "a; Wesley Fri
diu-cr. uf Carroll county. Maryland; Edward
Nelson picets 90 Newton county, Indiana.
Emma : Directs. the Plaintiff 1f Carroll
county. MARYLAND. and ghe share Of his de-
ceased daughter. Sarah T. Freshman. 90 90
e4l=aiv ta her four children. viz William
freshman, DAISY Freshman. Horl1io fetish
man aHi George Freshman. sho aH reside
wears uf age.
The Bil further states Thar said fe-tator az
BIS death was indebted % she Plaintiff en 81
single hil' tor $500 iate8 illy ~. Espo, %
aut. dsF With interest trna date. aud also fa
Jhs -um 81 SIihun balance da. h.r Tor work
dome for ;c-fator from October -nt, lS~H
when She isrsaus ~ wears old. go December