The united opinion. [volume] (Bradford, Vt.) 1881-1970, 1895-12-13


entry on thedocket might discontinued
The 500 was paid within the sixty days al
lowed for payment. The referee flied ms
report Dec. 4, 1895. Farnham and Plumbly
for plff; Tarbell & Whitman and Darling
q Daring for deft.
bertSOn. Action of trOver. This case stood
on the jury list but was continued with an
order Of bail on the plaintiff. Pocket Tor
plff.; LamSOn for deft.
No. 1852. Curtis S. Emery VS. Moses M;
Dunham. Action of slander. This stood
on the jury list but was settled. Darling q
Darling for pltf.; Stowe for dett.
No. ass. In re estate of Electa Hall,
Sarah A. E. Walton, admir- OF John wal
toms estate apt. f. r. Skinner, executor OF
the will of Electa Hall, appellee from the
settlement of the executors administration
account by the probate court. Hon. Hugh
Henry was appointed commissioner to try
and report the facts Dec, 1894. AT this
term the case was called up on the resigna-
ton of the referee as presented by the attof,
neys for the executor. Miss Walton had
become dissatisfied with the referee because
he was Judge of probate and in this mat
ter would be called on to pass upon the acts
of another judge of probate. Upon the rep
resentati0n of this feeling to Judge Henry
he very properly and very promptly resign
ed. The case is continued, notwithstaDd
| ing SINNERS attorneys claimed to be ready
for trial. Tarbell IL whitman and the Den
iSons for f K. Skinner; Farnham and Har-
vey for Miss 5. A. E, Walton.
No 487. Nina Moore VS. VIM. Goodrich
! Action of slander The plalntitf is non
| suited for Noncompliance with the order
| for bail Plff. pro Sc; Harvey for deft.
| No. 4S8. Black Mountain Granite Co. VS.
| G, H Woods. Action of assumpsit to re
cover amount subscribed for stock in plain
tlffs company. Motion Tor non SUIT fol
want of bail. Motion stricken off. Refer
red to referee as per stipulation. II stp
ulationis not filed in forty days with rete
ree's ndtne ssrett upon the reference IS 2"
yoked, dOntiiasd. Smith Il Sloan for plif
Watson and Dickey for deit
No. 4S9. Black Mountain Granite Co. VI
Moses &. Flanders. Same cause OF acton
same counsel and same entries on the dock
ct as in 4SS.
No. 497. Grace Lille Rich VS. Fred j
| Rich, Divorce granted for intOerable St
verify. Llbelant has leave to resume hel
maiden name. Darling IL Darling for IL
| belant.
No. sos. VIM. c. Clark, apt, VS. estate OF
| Andrt W 5. A lis Wallace 5. AlltS, admir-
Appeal from probate court. Heard on de
mlrrrr. Demurrer sustained and decara
| ton adjudged insufficient. Plaintiff has
leave to amend in thirty days; defendant
thirty days ercafter to pead. BOyden ful
pltf.; DeniSOn for deft.
No. OlU. Nflllt V luCtub W. Nuullto ~
Vincent. Divorce granted for Wlltull deStr
tion; lib liant has leave to resume her
maiden name, Nellie Richard on. Nichols
for libtllan6.
No. 5i5. Seth NJ. Flint VS. Charles E.
Abbott. ASsumpsit; suit discontinued hy
insolvency OF defendant. Denlsnn for pin
No. 5l6 Curtis ). Emery VS. Vt Mutual.
Union Mutual and L Fire lnS Cos. As
sumpSit. This case stood on the jury list
but on the call Of that list it was entered
settled. Darling IL Darling for pltf.; Sen
ter tor Union Mutual, Dillingham;. lluSe u
HOwland for Vt Mutual aud n E Fire lnS
co.
No. 5lS Myron w Carter vs LATHE E.
Carter Divorce granted for witull deSer-
tion. Smith 4 Sloan for llbelant.
No. 524 Vt Mutual Fire lnS Co VS. Ira a
.JrSspman and Emma b JrSSeman. As
Sumpsit; discontinued; Darling " Darling
for plff: Harvey for dett.
No. 536 State vs. Emma b JeSSeman; in
dictmrnt for perjurl; noltG pr0Scqu enter,
ed by the states attorney. Harvey and
DrniSnu or respondent.
so 53S. Morris FiliOn VS. Aliee FilltOn;
divorce granted for wilfull deSertiOn. Boy
den for llbpllant.
No SAB Philip G. Peabody VS. Charles
IlartShorn and Lucy ]. llarlShorn: aSSump
sit; discontinued. Stowe Tor PIN; no ap-
prarance for deft
No 546 Samuel NJ Ladd VS. BabcOck Il
Howard; aSsunpSit Rule for bail and CON
t!nued Harvey for pltf; Howard pro Sc,
Watson for deftS
No5I7 WE Shaw VS. Babcock & Howard
ASSumpsit Rule for bal and continued
Farnham for plff; Howard pro Sc, Watson
for dpttS
No SOB Elizabeth VI Carpenter VS. Sylvia.
nus b Carpenter As>umpSt Judgment by
court for plaintiff tn recover Slt22 59 dam
ages and costs Wilson for plH; BOyden
for drtt
No 554 Hiram o Ward No 555 Ira o
Hutchinson, No 556 Randolph Building As
SOcIatiOn and No 557 VI q Piprmoht all
plaintiffs in separate suits against j u Burt
and Eugene Segur These four suits are
discontinued by reason of the insolvency of
of the drfls Nichols 81 Wilson for pltfS; no
appearance fnr deits
No 55S Romina E Lupien VS. Napoleon ID
Lupien: divorce granted tor intulrraOlt Sc
verify; care and cuStpdy of five minor chit
lrrn drcrred to libellant The property
named in the libel for divorce drcreed 10
lib.llant as almuny " atSun for librllant
No $50 Nancy A CorlISs v John l} Cor
lisS Divorce granted for intnerable Sc
verify A limOny as per stipulation. Wat
son for libellant, During 4 Darling for Ii
belize.
No sol Filth Colby VS. VIM II Buck Suit
for br. ach of promise of marriage Defend
ant has sixty DAYS t0 plead Rule fer bail
and continued Bates Il May for plff; Smith
IL Sloan for dPft
No 563 Abbie Sprague VS. EdwinW Ilsev
No 564 Ahbe Sprague VS. llplpn + lis ey
Both of the abnve suits are for Slandrr; thr,
were heard together by the cuurt rn drmur-
rpr the declaration The demurrer i
sustained and the declarations ad-
judged insufficient and plaintiff is to pay
Gusts ppndiug The demurrer Leave is grant
ed I'M both ca,ps To rrplrad in thirty da,s
and thirty days 10 reply The order for
o,sfs In Ina nananlital UiIh hpfurp uipadinQS