The Evening dispatch. [volume] (Provo, City, Utah) 1891-1895, 1895-03-04
A FORTUNE AT CARDS.
1T WAS WON BY JOHN SCOTT, THE
"GENTLEMAN GAMBLER"


! Most Precise Methods.
Of all the gentlemen gamblers of tn
close of the eighteenth century in Eng
land single one is noted for the i'm
mensity and the regularity of his win
Mugs. This was John Scott, who, be
ginning as a penniless captain, woun'
up his career as a millionaire general
On the subject Of the campaigns he con
Quoted history is silent, but contempt
rary London was full of talk of his mar
velous luck with dice and cards, ant
the marital misfortunes of his later lif
gave more material for the gossips.
Writing to Richard Bentley, froT,
Arlington street, on Feb %, 1865
Horace Walpole says:
''The great event is the catastrophe;
Of Sir John Bland, who has flirted away
bis whole fortune at hazard. He t'othe,
night exceeded what was lost by the
late Duke of Bedford, having at one pc
Rod of the night Though he recovered
the greatest part Of y lost e32, 900.
The citizens put ON their double chan,
neled pumps and trudge to ST James
street in expectation of seeirg judgment
on Whites - angels, with flaming
swords, and devils flying away with
dicehoxas, like the prints in Sadler'H
hermits. Sir John lost this immense
sum to a Captain Scott, who at present
has nothing but few debts and his
commission.
Sir John Bland, to conclude here the
history of that luckless dicer, shot him
sci dead after losing the last of his for
tune in Kippax park.
Captain John Scott was Of that branch
of the numerous Scott family of which
Sir Walter was a member, and his an
cestor IN the thirteenth century was that
famous chemist, Michael Scott, who
won the name of Wizard. A later Scott
distinguished himself in the time of
Charles II by marrying, when he was
himself only IA years old, a lady who
was three years his Junior. The bride
was Mary, countess of Buccleuch, il
her own right the richest heiress in Scot
land. The marriage was a secret one,
and none of the friends and few of her
family were informed Of it until the
day after. The youthful bridegroom did
not profit greatly by this match, for his
bride died at 13. Her sister Anne, who
succeeded to her titles and estates, made
a marriage With the pet son of Charles
II, Monmouth, and had a numerous
family.
1t was 60 years later, or about 1850.
that young John Scott. son of the Laird
of Scots Tarvet, entered King Georges
army. Two years later he was in Lon
don and in the midst of the most recB
less set of spendthrifts, rakes and game
sters that English society has ever
known Sir John Bland was only one
of thousand rich young Englishmen
who threw away his fortune over the
gaming table at Whites. The one his
toric loser of that era was Charles James
Fox, Pitts rival. Fox gambled away,
all told, no less than So, 900, 600 Scott
was the very antipodes of Fox. When
he died, at a ripe old age, he left a for
tune as great as that with which Fox
had begun, and every penny of it had
been won at the gaming table. Fox was
q ripe scholar. Scott was almost illit-
crate Fox said that losing was the next
greatest pleasure to winning. Scott
never lost, or so rarely that it did not
affect the serenity of his career as a
winner, Fox would go home in the
after night in which he had
gambled away SO, 600 or $50, 900 and
Immediately lose himself IN a study of
Sophocles or Aschylus. Scott, like the
sensible fellow he was, would button
his coat over the portemonnaie in which
he carried away winnings of an equal
Or even greater amount and Immediate
ly go to bed SO as to be fresh for play
in the evening.
When Scott found himself in London,
and amid the wild young men of his
era, he determined that gaming was
his only chance of getting money. When
Ge engaged himself to throw series of
mains with Sir John Bland, he had, as
Horace WalpoIe puts it, nothing ''but
q few debts and his commission. His
taught him that there was
in dicing, at which a stupid
man has as good q chance as q bright
Dne, and so he speedily gave up hazard
and applied himself TO whist, at which
game heaven fights on the side of the
skillful player. Never in the history of
play did men gamble for such high
stakes as Scott and his victims did as
Whites between 1853 and 1850. Scott's
system was an exceedingly simple one.
He gave himself the best of it in ev.
cry possible way. He never went to the
gaming table unless his head and his
were in the very best order.
He never lost his composure or his goo6
nature for an instant. He played per.
Seotly fair and honorable game, nd at
first he made it a rule never to play for
more than fixed sum, which he could
afford to lose He won so steadily that
it wasn't long before he was prepared
to risk any sum which even the wealth.
lest or the most reckless of his adver.
saries would venture to propose.
a story which illustrates capitaily
Scott's patience in the face of hard luck
has been preserved. One night, while
be was at the card table, news was
brought to him that his wife, the first
Mrs. Scott, had given birth to girl
"Ah," he said, II shall have to dou.
BILE my stakes to make a fortune for this
young lady"
But in few hours he was e9, 900 to
the bad Retaining his inYariable seren.
ity, he said he was sure of his luck re.
turning, and at a. m. he went home
the winner of e15. 000 That's the sort
Of play that went on at Whites night
after night during the yeS'-s that John
Scott was winning the largest fortune
over accumulated by a gentleman gam.
0ies.-Exchapge.