New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1895-04-27
AboMmons
"THE QUEEN OF TABLE WATERS"
First in Purity"
British Medical Journal.
British Medical Journal.

him. Friends Of NJ. Cruger had contributed
money for his campaign. he said.
o-Are You aware that Cruger contributed to
y1,r political fund? Al am quite sure ne dld N,
QDo you intend that your conversation VIM i'm
wha; you have told rs A.-les. ., 49,, c,o,
ON a conversation you had with Mr. Shef,
fed did YOU tell him that You were going 10 PRINT
ca the Te You w,2te that Srt acto nG Of tbe
judiciary Committee upon the Sa.eS Dill ~ b
S g oq ba {opf ha a s afternoon papers
Q.--You knew that Raines and Coggeshali hai yoleu
TO write the article? Al don't know. but if 1t
Q-When dd YOU finish writing that article? A.
About O'Clock in the evening
After some more sparring Mr.. Quigg said he
would admit that he moved II write the
article by the knowledge that Senators Raines.
Coggeshan and Robertson had opposed the Jul
dical Sales bill and also the Police Reorganiza-
ton bill.
There was dispute as to ire testimony which
had been given by Ffremen Clifford and Rothen-
hansen on Saturday to the raising Of money
by the officers and the mention of Senators
Raines. Coggeshall and Robertson, and the
stenographer read from his notes of the test-
mony. MI Qulgg said that the information
which had been mentioned in the testimony
was not sufficient for charge of corrupt ne
collation. He declined to explain the meaning
of the article he had written, saying that It
spoke for itself.
Q-At the time YOU wrote that article did you
know whether Senators Raines and Coggeshali hal
anything to do way or an9ner Wn iae CceT ns
the officers amendmant passed 49, c..,u u,s
Eoq he oceTs nSrease that WAS su
tlcient fact base charge OF corrupt dealings a.
i should say that any one of the facts have de-
,otla he
Q~Had senators Ralnes and Coggeshall voted in
anr 30 last have APPEARED in "The Pres? Al
think it would. 1t might not have appeared that
CONVERSATIONS WITH OFFICERS.
Odd you personally apply to any members Of
the Officers Association for information before YOU
published that article? Al had conversations with
two officers upon the matter
Q-What were their names? A.-One was named
Free. and the others was Graham.
Q.-Tel the nature Of your conversations with
tbinr abSu H. and hat he had defined TO have any
lie also said he considered the efforts OF the men
obtain an increase Of salary was placing IN
jeopardy the two per cent tax bill Consequently
he had no sympathy with the efforts 20 obtain an
increase OF salary. Graham. however. tod mo ne
though, about $500 had been raised toward fund
to get the officers increase pe sel he t9ll me thai
u FrceI His knowledge OF this matter was based
upon what he had heard lie bad taken up similar
position 70 Mr. Freel and declined to have anything
Q.-Did you have any conversations win any OF
the other officers OF the association? A-No.
Q.-Why did you not make more Efforts in THIS
direction before you made the charges against the
three Senators? A.-Because ] d!d not think the
officers association was good source Of nforma-
ton upon the subject.
Q.-Do you mean 10 say that out 81 l9S men you
could not get any TO tell the truth? Al do not
say anything Of the Kind.
Odd YOU stop TO think whether Il was worth
while TO ind out the facts? Al did stop 70
find the facts. ! pursued my Investigations IN
many directions.
QEBut You got nothing except wha, you heard
from nremen who have said by heard some
thing from some one else? \ = Is yet to be seen
whether did not get anything
Q-Now, Mr.. Quigg. the DAY gf'or you published
THIS article did YOU not take further steIs - oh
tain more Information? Did you have a talk with
Mr.. Sheffield. with reference to bringing officers be-