San Antonio daily light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1886-1907, 1895-01-11
AROUND THE COURTS.
Proceedings of the Forty-fifth Dis
trIct Court-New Suits.

Proceedings of the Forty-ffth Dis-
trIct Court-New Suits.
The case OF the Diamond State
Iron company against the San An
tonic and Arkansas Pass Railway
company is still on trial in the
Thirty.seventh District court:
FoRTY-FIFTH DISTRICT COURT.
]. Frazer & Co. VS.. ]. ]. Stevens,
punishment; judgment for de-
PENDANT.
J.H. McLeary VS.. q. NJ. Cadwal-
lader, on promissory note; judg-
ment by default.
Alb. Kirsohbaum & Co. VS.. s. B.
Wood, on sworn account; judg.
ment for defendant and plaintiff
gave notice of appeal.
Julius Padetsky vs.. j. II. Padets-
ky, divorce; judgment for plain
tiff.
The Lone Star Brewing company
VS.. Charles Reuchlin, on promis-
sorry note; judgment by default.
The Merchants and Mechanics
Building and Loan association vs..
f. II. Moore and Fl. B. Allen, debt {;
dismissed as to Allen and judg-
ment for plaintiff.
The Merchants and Mechanics
Building and Loan association vs..
Il. ID. Finucane ct al, debt; judg-
ment for plaintiff as per decree.
The Bexar Building and Loan
association VS.. Charles busch ct al,
on promissory note; judgment by
default.
w. q. Higgs ct al, vs.. c. Guer-
gum, Injunction; dismissed for
want Of prosecution.
Wolff & Marx VS.. E. Routledge,
on account; judgment for plaintiff,
and defendant gave notice Of ap-
peal.
Sam Rose VS.. G. Denecke, on note
and attachment dismissed for
want Of prosecution.
The F. F. Collins Manufacturing
company VS.. the Alamo Heights
Land and Improvement company,
on promissory note; judgment for
plaintiff.
Reagan Houston, assignee, vs..
n. Mackey, on promissory note !;
judgment for plaintiff.
The Hugo Schneider company
vs N. Mackey, on promissory note ;
judgment for plaintiff.
F. G. King and D. d. Mallory vs..
Richard Wooley, Jr., ct al, on
promissory note and to forecloso
lien; judgment for plaintiff.
NEW SUITS FILED.
]. B. Maltsberger vs.. M. q. Malts-
berger, divorce.
The City OF San Antonio VS.. Dan
Sullivan, to foreclose lien.
The San Antonio and Gulf Shore
Railway company vs. William
Davis ct al, injunction and man.
damus.
Elise Simon vs. Joseph Fredo-
line Simon, divorce.
J.E. Maxwell vs.J. d. Crenshaw
and L. S. Palmer, on promissory
note.
LICENSED TO WED.
w. H. Price and Lulu Rogers.
j. FL. Griffin and Ida NJ Elliott.
INJUNCTION AND MANDAMUs.
The injunction and mandam us
case Of the San Antonio and Gulf
Shore Railway company against
VIM. Davis ct al, is set for hearin e
in the Forty-fifth District for to-
morrow morning. The bond was
fixed at $4,000, which the railroad
company furnished, and process is
being issued today.
JUSTICE COURTS.
Leon Marshall was tried by Jury
in Justice Devine's court today,
charged with using abusive Ian
guage towards Mrs. Pablo Rosales.
The jury brought in a verdict Of
not guilty.
The case against John Naylor,
charged with striking Sadie Thorn
hill, was not taken up in Justice
Devine's court this morning, as
expected. Those who saw the &C.
currence say that complainant at
tackled Naylor and that he merely
pushed her aside.
A case styled NJ. J. Hewitt
against DR.. De Lipscey and Seth
Thomas, suit for trial OF right OF
property, is being tried in Justice
Jones' court. The property in.
volved is stock Of boots and shoes
formerly belonging to the business
OF James Martin, deceased, a for
mer shoe dealer OF East Houston
street.
COURT NEWS.