New-York tribune., 1895-07-21

Liberals
McCarthytes =
Parnetes
ro.o, l6.
fridays pollngs. which were declared to-day.
chou q gain or eight seats for the Tories three
for the Trionists and two for the Liberals.
The eight Saturday pollings declared. show two
Tory and two Unionist gains. Thus the net
gain Of the Tnionists on Friday and Saturday
was 13. Their total net gain Is t9
Conservative successes continue with perhaps
now and then a passing defeat. "a when Lib
eral candidate is returned in spite OF all pre-
diction. as In Lincolnshire Brgg Division. where
II 7 Reckitt the Liberal candidate. was elected
70 tho surprise Of ALL the Conservatives having
carried the district in 1892. \ similar story comes
from Lnthgowshire.
Among the features Of the day was the rejec-
ton Of H. Rider Haggard. the novelist who stood
for the Conservatives in East Norfolk In Hamp-
shire Isle Of Wight Division. Sir Richard Web
ster was reelected with about the same majority
that the Conservatives gave him in 1892.
mob composed Of political opponents or the
novelist H. Rider Haggard. the Conservative can
didate for East Norfolk proceeded to the hote'
in the village OF Staham. where Mr. Haggard
was conducting his campaign last evening and
surrounded the house Their attitude was 50
threatening that additional police were sum-
moned and at midnight II required hundred OF
them. with drawn cutlasses. To conduct Mr.
Haggard and his party To a more friendly dis
trict
Lord Salisbury majority Is now cal,ulated IA
being between l25 and $50.
RETURNS FROM CONTESTED DISTRICTS.
The following returns II elections in contested
districts were received to-day:
Huntingaonshlre Ramscy Division -Aiwyn Fe:-
lows Cconservatlvel 30i2 II. Heldmann d.iberaD.
2csS In 1882 the Conservative majority was ~,
d.ibcraD iis7: Sir \ Grant trnonisD. 3s''. Far
quharsons majority IN l@- "4s 10; =, to,,.o,-
Ferguson G.iberaD AIR X. l. Tooth Conserva-
tive,. 4.as Mr. Johnson-Ferguson Was returned IN
''I5 peDSlsh Ds,rci- W. T. Howell cconseryative,.
$50; ~ H. Morgan ddberah. l.6oA In iss2 the
&orthamp,onshire. scqih pyi'on-E S p ,.Pn Pen
nan 'Yi u IN ,s ~ssf war Is 'e'A'
An Anglesey~E Sc j Grniih d.l6crap tEs; J. R Rob
'0E;iyk Ki2ykeadbrs NJ Stewart Conserys,iye'
26s4. J. a. Duncan d.heIaD. -'''h Inc OohS'f'"-
tive m jorty was 81 IN lss2 - go,
incolnshre. Brigg Divsion-H Re. Ky, ,Lis- ,s
e-an tsss. ! NJ Richardson lconservai.Nol Ills.
In iSe the Conservative candidate was erected oy
snsses ma19tE Eas, rins,ead piyisonG Go.cAcn Con
se,yativc,. 373i. II Corbcu dAberaD 2s'A In i%r
the Conservative majority ~as - u. - r...,.-
d-,beraD s2i5: Captain Baumgar'en conssrvaiive,.
5,z54 In 1882 the liberal majority "a, ~ na,cor,h.
Conservativei. 3n7. David Answorih u-lberap;
s.sss In 1892 Mr. Ainsworih was elected ~ :"
Red.o2dshire. Blggcswade Diyision-I,ord Awyne
Compton Il unionisp sst1 o IN Hs,s "a "''''" ''"'
Dniham Northwest Division -Atheriey J9S.- ~, die
crab s,2 M, JossS IS ,:Ss as Ss"sssSS'''' @ ''' "
6xfordshire WOODSTOCK Division II Mor1sn Isd
(conseryative). 4css. q. X Benson ,I"o'r'' "''"'
Tt. I mai lsf- Was III
SIR RICHARD WEBSTER REFLECTED
uampshlre Isle Of wlgh, Division SIR Richard
vs,ssr 1conservatlye, SSo: A woichousc dh.
eraH s2es Sir Kcharl wchsi'rs majority IN iSSz
"ns "BnsacXinghamshire. Buckneham, pvisiIonmw, ".
oar'S etn 50, In iss. the Liberal majority was ia
6vhn County. south Division II. Punkei Con,
serva,iye, 4Ss: H. Burke Parneli'e). 2s" In 1902
nnVonsh,re' Barnstable Division Sir W. g. G1h
UnionisU $50. a. Blison dAbefaD no Ih' LID
andashre of@sk,5k loas9 By.onA ern6 a. fSFS'?h @ ih
iSe2 the Conservative majority Tss @ ..l, ,ro,..ry,.
Roxburshshire Earl Of palkeih !SDnrerya was
sisei elected IN IN 1882 by is majority. ...
T Hope (Conservatiye) 3i&. Hope was elected J"
Merionetshre-T. +. Ellis GAheraD Ply; - r. 80,
owen Conservative. 22SE. El'iss majority IN '''-
VIZ Essex .x'' Southeast, Dyison-M Major Rasch Con
sorvative $40: D. ~ Watson GiberaD. $3.50 Major
Raschs majority In iS2 Wa .z co,or.l Foster
Lancashire. Lancaster DIVISION, 9iVnrn 1 ~,
The liberal maturity in Iss2 %as So Leighton
1conseryatiye,. fCO5. Captain owen Thomas LIB
crab. 1886 In 1892 Mr Leighton was returned WIN
o"; ";loUcsstershire. Gircncester Divisional na,h-
urst 11ceonscrvative1. ,5e: II ". T. lawson d"b-
crab i29s In 1892 ihs Loera "rrsp n]o'V Vai,oEsso
S44so 'STt Campbell GinionisD. 30 In 1892 the Ma
tonasts had iS2 vd1sSm majority Rec. pavIe. Gberan
aSi sSnnSer. Dawes cconserva've' 1870 The
Liberal majority In 1882 vas l.o'''
H. RIDER HAGGARD DEFEATED.
Norfolk. East Division-R J. Price d.iberap Ag.:
majority a In the election Of 1892 was 40. a.,
n.,berap' ScS; Arnold White dAberal, ,Unionisp,
5e5i The Liberal majority IN 1892 ,,sr wa, 'sU n,sr,
,rha rmsoI'lis; Iherai majority in 1892 was Ile
inverness BgrshR b Fnsy @ na9 he SeTa
i6se ie,' a seat seat Their majority In 1892 was 80
Yorkshire shipsy bivIsqnF rrnn' Here
the Liberals lose "A seat Their majority ID NV was
ssls .a' Mr. McHngh CSaiIonallsp. s2i7 In the cce
ton Of 1892 Mr. Hedmonds majority was HG
s,n GaTmnr,nfnSh3lTTs Sa4s 3T " % R"ckiey 6nons SOB
In 1902 Mr. Morgan was elected without opposition.
Sn.e4%st1e %ss%sffspd APHe'wS r y Pry Gse2aD a The
censsrya,Iye %sj@ry in e Taf + % Pcaso obcrap
4.7s2; Major Ropner Wonservative) Az. In 1882
the Liberal majority was 3is .
Montgomerysh shire Humphreys owen naberap.
2ii2: r. Williams wynn Conservative. 3,f5 The
Liberals In 1892 had M5 ma tority
Somerset. East Divlson-iIenry Hobhouse obs
scnticnt LiberaD, 4iOs SwInburne Iianham q.ib-
crab 4ssi The Dtssentient Liberals In 1897 had 7b5
majority - - ,,,
Lancashire Gorton Division 7. q. Hatch Con
seryative) 5s65; DR. Parkhurst independent Labor.
42GI The Liberal candidate withdrew. The LIB
erals lose the scat Their majority I'm 1872 was
222.
Flint District-J II. Lewis U.ibcral. lS2S; T.. T..
Pcnnant Conservative. 1853. The Liberal majority
In 1892 1863
Cheshire Crew Divsion-Thc Hon. Il. A Ward
Conservatvo) 5.il5: w. s. Il. McIarcn OibcraD.
1853. Here the Liberals lose seat Their ma
jorty In 1892 lJGS
Yorkshire Soweri,v Dvison-J. W. Melor u.ib-
crab, 5.328; J. G. Bailey liberal nonisD. 375i.
In 1892 the Liberal majority was 2.i30
rNOPPOSED ELECTIONS.