New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1895-07-17
rNIONISTS GAIN HEAVILY.
CIR WILLIAM HARCOURT WILL STAND
FOR WEST MONMOUTHSHIRE

rI,RNED By a REDUCED MAJORITY
j. H. PARNELL NOMINATED
FOR SOUTH MEATH.
london. July 16.---The Unionist gains through
.he day have been looked upon with great ois-
.,,ontment by the Liberals and their friends.
Tho returns received up to midnight snow the
-,-o.,o, NJ 2sl Conservatives and Unionsts. 4o
I,hsrals |? McCarthyites and Parnellites max
ing net Unionist gain Of 81 seats
n the counties follow the lead OF the boroughs'
-.vertng to Unionism In the same proportion'
tho marty wirepullers estimate that Lord SAILS
bury will control majority In the Commons OF
% o,er the combined Liberal and Irish men,
hers Such a sangune view. however. is IN no.
,,,ss assured OF being realized The Liberals
,uIld their hopes upon the results In the counues
70 check the Unorist flood and largely neutrahze
,be early successes OF that party.
Among the interesting features Of the day was
..o announcement that Sir William Harcourt
had accepted the nomination to stand for the
Uas, Division Of Monmouthshire. c. NJ. Warming
TON Home Ruler. who represented the division
a.. tho last Parliament, having declined to con-
test the seat.
The rejection in East Nottingham of Arnold
Morley the late Postmaster-General senos 'ne
fourth ex-Minister from the Liberal benches- Inc
Right Hon. Henry Hartley Fowler. Secre'ar! Vi
State for India In the late Cabinet VINO was un-
opposed in the East Division OF Woverhah'p'on
in 1892. was reelected by more than Thousand
majority One of the surprises OF the day was 'he
,,,r, NJ q Conservative for Northampton as
comember with Henry Labouchere. whose iohs
union with Mr.. Bradlaugh. and later with MI
Manifold had caused the constituency 10 De re-
garded as unalterably Radical Mr. Laooucnere
wi,, not fail 10 see the humor OF the si'uation'
rne side null Of the Socialists Robertson and
Jones is chiefly answerable for the deiea' oi MI
Hartford. the other Liberal candidate.
The rejection of the Labor candidates in many
e,ectorates is noteworthy. The defeat OF such
prominent trade -unonists az George ho"ei'' ~
Betbnal Green. and W. r. Cremer, OF arbitrase
o.. 4, tho Haggerston Division Of Shoreditch.
Is heavier and more significant blow TO the
Labor party than the overthrow of dozen "'ho-
bags and hunters after notoriety like James ke'r
uardie who was defeated yesterday In West
Ham Indeed the conversion of the East Emo
~ London 10 Unionism as shown by the results
IN those and other districts. is remarkable
feature of the contest.
Tba Conservatives made six gains in London
,odov and even where the Radicals retained
their seats, as did James Stuart In the HoXtoh
Division Of Shoreditch. and Mr.. Pckersgili III
the Southwest Division Of Bethnal Green the
maioritiee greatly reduced. IL Is ho'aoie
that while the Unionist Parsee bAo"hasree'
overthrew Strong Man" Howell, the FORMER
coreligionist Lord Salisbury's famous piacK
man, has fallen.
The enormous Unionist majorities given IN the
Bordesley. the North. the South and the Yves,
Divisions of Birmingham bear striking testimony
10 the strength of Mr.. Chamberlain's noid IN"
vAod hV
az the most effective answer to the persistent
and vehement attacks upon the oes' "a'eN
I'nionist in the Kingdom
There was hard fight in Southampton ana
tho mol, WAS very heavy. H. F. Evans. Home
RuIer was replaced by the Unionist Sir Bar
rington Simeon.
7. II. Parnell, Parnellite. has been nominated
for South Meath TO stand against the present
member Jeremiah Jordan. Anti-Parnellte
In Sunderland. r. p Doxford. Unionist re-
ceiyed 1888 votes; E. T. Gourley, Liberal s'zoz'
and SAINT Ell Storey. Liberal, s1ss
In Gromsby. George Doughty. Liberal received
ls47 votes. and the Right Hon. f. Heneage.
4,les.
IN THE CONTESTED DISTRICTS.
vember, ere returned as follows from the
contested districts:
Tnionis0. 1856 Liberal majority ls cnionist
HsensH sstonKaTT tcqnssryaiiys '1Se ns
district SH., in the last Parliament; r.. s...sr
s1sD Rsh H1p ss7 W fCy fossr tfsRsasfI
asSs Liberal majority 81 oIomh Eah Gn,onsp 1Il ss4s
Woor,on MiberaD 2s0 Unionist majority. $685.
cHy SyDsrs nsD Ho"E: Enons '
jorty. 1885, gain. "a - z,r c,, III Heath
Unionis0. Uhint s.ss7 liberal majority sss Unonist
UaionIsi TaH Sn,Sa5s9. %a5o2.y. s2 ST. Liberal gain
4. E, Fletcher d.beraD. 2,7Ss' Unionst majority
''f slrminshsm-N a s pv,son-Aderman W Ken
rick Tnionis0. 45i7 Mr.. Lancas,er dAberaD. lab
rnlenis, majority ys2ssy ssss Tanii e nioSso @ 4s.
BaanIine .GIome Ruler'' 4s24 Cnions' majority
Birminsham- @ DivlslonnAaerman Ill.
Williams dTnonisl $50; NJ psie''%an Prize ca d'oerap
Iii TnISni1t Bs'Sss Hon
Jesse Collins Gnionst. sSSt; MT, Mr. Cock &c HberaD
aa %Sa'st %sssrS RFa, Hon L.
d Ss " oss 0
win Morris Gncniso ss70 liberal majority %'
GIouce.,er- Monk GnonlsD, ,o,;S sS4 .7 Spence
Wells GiberaD. 2.7sl Unionist majority 49, gan"
wolverhampton-East Diyison-Thes he Right Hon
2s77. Liberal majority. lO34 ,,,,,.,
'Hammersmth-General Godsworthy ,CniohisV
5oi7 " c. ssteadman G4abor). S'25S Union'st ma
Kidderminster-A F. Godson U'nonisO 2H:
Richard Eve QAberaD. l.13. Cnonist majority Eo'
ga\l 90 -, >..o n -,
Nwington-west Diysion--Captair Norton qib- Up
crab 32l9: c. w. Taants (CnionisO, z'So LID
eral majority. 4z3: loss, 670 , =, y.,,or
Noting South bivislon-Lord II: Bentnss aSa
QJnionisU 1902: +. W. Maudc. u~peraD' 4'oo'
tnionist majority. 4S3: gain $50 c,.,o,,.,,
Marycbone-East Division-E. Bouln0is " n,oh,sO' @
1904; Mr.. Gardner O.iberaD l,s45. Cnionist ma
jorty, 49, gain. C57. - c,.x,
Standardization Division-Professor. etqah.
Oi6eraD, $3.50. Hon. c. Hay Unionisp. z.soZ. i"o-
eral majority. 12s; loss. 1.lGs.
,rty,, ,,rp,rc CAIN THREE SEATS.