The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1895-05-17
EoURTH DISTRICT COURT.

IN the district court yesterday, the case
OF Hattie Seley VS.. J. NJ. Carter was tried
before jury. The plaintiff, handsome
young lady, sues the defendant for $4,000
damages for breach OF promise to marry
The defendant had kept company with
her for three years until last January,
When the wedding day was fixed for the
18th OF the month. Suddenly the defend
ant left ana went east, where he married
this city and in March last was arrested
and released on 81 600 bail.
The defendant did not deny the allega-
lions OF the complaint and the only ques-
ton before the jury was as to the amount
OF damages. There was an effort made to
ind out how much money Carter had but
the searching expedition did not develop
much. A while before he was married
the plaintiff said he stated that he had
$1,000 in cash and there was evidence
than 5000 on his person when arrested,
s., zoo - Wy -'''A
The case was given to the jury late in
the evening.
The following orders were made:
w. s Benton VS.. Colorado and Utah
Canning company; demurrer TO complaint
May Is
Thomas H. Ensor VS.. E. F. Bratz; plain
tifts motion for new trial argued and
taken under advisement.
James A Wright VS.. Southern Pacific
company; defendants motion to continue
hearing for the term submitted.
George Barr VS.. Brunswick, Bake, Col
lander company; motion for new trial;
hearing continued.
Ensor Remedy company VS.. James E.
HorrockS; plaintiffs motion for new trial
argued ana taken under ADJUSTMENT.
Thomas Maloney ct al. vs. Catherine
Toland; defendants motion for new trial
Srgued and denied.
Matte L. Preshaw VS.. Ogden Street
Railway company; demurrer TO complaint
submitted.
H A. TAFT receiver, VS.. ogden Savings
bank and VS.. First National bank; de-
mIrrer submitted and oVerruled and de-
PENDANTS given to and including May %
George Grehl ct al VS.. A a Law ct al;
hearing continued to May IS.
James Iverson VS.. E. H. Parsons ct al:
motion 70 ,yaacate judgment set for Satur-
William Bybee VS. Frederick Garner ct
al: motion Tor new trial set for May Is.
Thompson vs. Sunson; motion for new
trial set for May Is.
Mary E. Primm VS., Mary E. Foulke ct
al; demYrrer to answer set for May Is.
demurrer overruled and defendant given
to and including May % to plead.
j. P Peterson vs.. Niels Nelson; demur-
rer set for May IS.
Niels Jensen VS.. Agricultural Insurance
company; demurrer to complaint set for
May 49,
c, Q; J, Salisbury i vs.. !. z. Stewart ct al;
Ambrose Z. Shaw VS. Enoch Farr ct
al; decree of foreclosure granted as
prayed for.
James A. Wright VS. Southern Pacific
company; on motion of defendant, order
ed that cause be continued until May 2S.
Sidney Stevens VS.. Sun Insurance COM
pany; costs taxed at $500
Harry Stevens VS.. Samuel Drezdowitz:
on motion Of defendant, ordered that
hearing on motion to dismiss action be set
for May 49,
Frank Thompson ct al vs. Willis H.
StInson; on motion of attorney for plain
tiff, ordered that default entered on April
16, be set aside.
Matte l. Preshaw, an infant VS..
Ogden City Street Railway company;
court announced its decision oVerruliris-
demurrer heretofore submitted.