The daily morning journal and courier., 1895-01-18
Superior Court-Civil side-Judge Ralph
 Wheeler.

Superior COurt-Civil side-Judge Ralph
 Wheeler. Tn this court late yesterday afternoon Judge Wheeler rendered a decision in the divorce suit of Sarah J. Fields of Madison against her husband, c Will bur Fields, a Branford farmer The al- legations were intemperance and fn- tolerable cruelty. The case was heard by Judge Wheeler Wednesday. Mrs. Fields, by the decision, Is granted the divorce on both grounds. She is also awarded the custody of six minor chill dren, and given $500 alimony,i which is. decreed shah be paid by the defendant not later than the first Monday in April
 The short calendar session to-day again bids fair to be an usually lengthy one. On the list there are no less than ten ex-parte divorce cases, four of whom are New Haven applicants. The cases assigned for trial to-day are as fol- lows:
 Mesham vs. the Connecticut Indemni- ty association ;Sdemurrer.S
 Maguire vs. Mcguire; motion for more specific statement.
 Goodlng vs. Gooding; motion for bill of specifications, also motion for an al- lowance to defend.
 Browns appeal from probate; motion by Loren D. Garter to be cited in as a co-appellant.
 Miller vs, the Raulie Manufacturing company; motion for additional orders.
 No1 No1n I for failure to file answer.
 Dunlap vs Merritt ct als; motion for the appointment of a committee.
 Shaw vs. Reilly; motion that counter claim and motion to make George E. Cole a party-plaintiff be erased.
 Hogben vs. the Metropolitan Life Tn- surance company; motion that the bill l of particulars as amended December l S1, 1894, be made more specific, and l that certain portions thereof be stricken l out and otherwise corrected.
 Cannon ct ux. ys. the Metropolitan | Life Insurance company.
 Ryan vs. Proctor; motion for judg- l ment of foreclosure.
 Phelan vs. the Journal Publishing | company; motion for leave to amend | also, demurrer.
 Phelan vs. Gilbert; motion for more | specific answer.
 Cunning vs. O'Sullivan; demurrer
 Ryder vs. Ryder, ct als.; motion for | default for failure to file answer.
 Tefft, Weller & Co vs. York, ct al, | executors; motion for non-suit for non- 
 Monson ct ux., ct al. vs. Wooding, | administratrix, ct als., motion to ex- punge portions of the amended com plaint.
 Rodolphi vs. Ross; motion for default for failure to file answer.
 Wilkinson vs. Carney, ct all; motion for the acceptance of report of com mittee.
 The New England Terminal con- pany vs. the First National bank of South Norwalk; motion for order that plaintiff file with the clerk all of it's books accounts, vouchers and papers pertaining to it's dealings with c. F. Olds and with Benedict, Pardee & Co. O'Donnell vs. Sargent & Co.,; demur- Ter.
 Allen vs. Allen; motion for order that answer be filed.
 Ex-parte divorce 'cases--Hawley vs. Iawley, Cain vs. Cain, Adams vs. Adams, Slason vs. Slason, Brown ys. Brown, Rauscher vs Rauscher, Hitch- ,ock vs. Hitchcock, Brownell vs. Morin vs, Morin. Straley vs. 5traley.
 CityCourt-Criminal Side-Judge Gable. Charles A. Hunt, theft and embezzle- nent, continued until January IS; John ]. Goggins, violation of Sunday law, continued until January 25; George H. Mains, breach of the peace, continued Intil January IS.
 Court Notes. Tn the superior court yesterday the j divorce suit of Bernice c. smith, formerly of Fair Haven, against . -araplia h ~ Smith wa e noto7 n, a,,aad o,5