Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1895-08-04
Omaha Quarrel Must
Wait Until Tuesday.
BOUND BY INJUNCTION.
The Court Claims Tina, the Action Of
the Combine was Against
All Law.


OMAHA, Aug, :.
IN a. r. 4. combine attempting to
control ne police and Arc departments viii
ny % ahle TO make another move before
Ihesday, The district court heard tho arsu.
meh's today ON tho injunction rentralning
lhc new commission from acting inis In
nitaleu thAt decision would DC rendered
tuesday. The court further intlmated that
" us mandatcH were ugain ignored by the
elN council officers they wuuld be Jailed In
'ns meSntlmc. the old board runs the city,
,Niter conNoning court. Judge fopewcll OF
the district court said that on sfiday be.
loro him. ~ rokahmA. a petition yorihod as
provided ny law had been presented 10
Nun the pctuon asking that an Injunction
lszue against the city council restraining
mem from approving tho bonds Of nroaioh,
,N,Stn,derNoort and fostor who claimed to
ap 9ip r s1lho,h,menls a. members OF the hre
m'u puliee commission. lie has examined
lho petition ana found that IL was duly
utAwh az provided By the Atatutoa liz
togil 20 nothing had he desired other than
In ordcr that all tho parties might bo
bNeh a chanro TO show why such an tntunu.
ION mould not Issue he had set hearing
" umaha AZ NJ O'Clock this morning. liz
thuleloio wrote telegram potinlur the
pleslg'ut anu mcmbur Of the city ooun.
49,, w INC temporary restraining order lilo
men lonh the evening train for Omahn 10
pc present NJ the hearing tbdAv Whrn he
i,aehed Omaha hc was surprised To md
that mo fehttalnlng order Of the court mad
v nv IGNORED ana the express ordum of
.nt court uehod, He mad hoped that this
morning he could have taken IN mo local
aaiapu't Vi inc case presented by tho lnIunc.
"liut the question now prcson,s n.oit 81.
san Judge llupvwct shall the ron,nun
w hllnw THIS defiance OF the law To mss
m miign,io comment 9g tgbukey The com.
gWtNuohs now arising" concluded tho
turc." f''"'i"' "u'
He expressed regret that this eompllrn
M, nuu nllsen, hul aH u Judge Il WAS Ills
H4alIrH "a
ahd olrNcd The situation was such thnt
~ could not lguorr It aud must soc what
H. WY hs court was, Judge Donuc uf
lh' Oh commissions counsel Htutrd thai
Tue question of the Integrity uf the court
WAS at Rtukc.
Your honor cnn take what rourso hc
wishes In regard 10 the Injunction hornusn
wy can iry I'll the tluestiuns we wish In III,
olh'i INJUNCTION proceedings" ndtlel Judr,
uoanH, nut we do Insist that the Integrity
or ms country should be nnlntnlued mo
drtluu Of tie city connect ,ynN Ia dpnnuc,
az me law and nothing hut unarchlsiic
NM az attempt uh their mart IL carry their
p9int III spite NJ law and order"
lNUhnld HAL for tho now bonrd tnsistod
thni bccnuse Judge Dome stated thai inv
points could not be raised IN the second
injunction TINT therefore the nrsf snIt
must be fraud on the coutt, 10 this
lioahc responded that this was merely an
attempt 10 mlslead the court. lie npprc,
HlntrI NE embarrassment Of tho court aud
hulru me dlHpn!o would properly be
Drought To Issue In tho courts and III give
vcray
Neither he or his clients had any lntop.
ZION 70 make II unpleasant for the other
SIDE, hut II was the duty ~ tho mdgcs 10
nru,H't ile homer Of the courts of the
prnnlr. ilpane said he had no desire n
any method In carry this ease brynnd a
pnint which would be- pleasant 10 both
1T Is evident" he said, othai If the pro
cess OF this court was violated the Sity
would De plunged Into an nnnrchlsiic