The record-union., 1895-11-15
lDenartlnent TWO.l

WEDNESDAY, November IS, 1895.
Grim. 25-The People VS.. Ihomas-Judg-
ment ana order reversed ana "a new trial
granted. Commissioners. Mcfarland, j.;
Henshaw, j.. Temple, j.
1S,409-Tne First National Bank OF Fresno
vs. Dusy ct al.-Or1ered cause he remanded
to the court below with directions 10 modify
! the Judgment SO as TO include SAID water
/ stock In the order OF sale, ana as so modified
! the judgment be affirmed, appellant to re
4 cover his costs on this appeal Commission
ers. Mcfarland, j.; Temple, j.; Henshaw j..
In Bank
THURSDAY, November H. 1895
| l.. a. 127-Terry vs.. Superior Court-rne
! application lor writ OF prohibition is de
med. BY the court
/ 10, ,697-McGrath VS.. Carroll ct als.-Ih9
! judgment appealed from is affirmed. Hen
/ shaw, j. We concur: Mcfarland, j.; Van
Fleet, j.. Harrison, j.; Beatty, c. j.; Car
S +. I35-Cosby vs.. superior Court-or-
! dered that ii peremptory writ issue as prayed.
| Van Fleet, j. We concur Beatty, G. j.; Hen
shaw. j.; Mcfarland, j.; Harrison, j. Gar
/ Quite, j.
department One.)
SACRAMENTO. Nov. II, 1896.
| Court met al 10 q. m. Present, Harrison J.
! presiuin@ Garoutte j.; Van Fleet. j.; John
| SON, equity Clerk; Washburn, Baiif.
| sac. oo-Barnneld VS.. South Side Irrigation
! Company-PulS Slant 10 stipulation, submit
/ ted upon briefs on file.
! sac. l3-Keener VS. The Eagle Lake and r.
rigaLion COmpany-PuTSuant to stipulation
!
| sac. 14-ki5go VS.. The Eagle axe and Irri-
! CATION Company-Pursuant to stipulation,
| submits e upon briefs on file.
| Sac. 33-Purser vs.. Hutchinson ct al -Pur-
| Suant to stipulation, submitted upon briefs
/ on le.
| sac. 3G-Spooner VS.. Cady-Pursuant to
stipulation, submitted upon briefs on rle.
| sac. 05-CalI1ornia Savings ana Loan Soci-
| ETY. VS. Harrls-Opening argument waived by
! W. H. Larew for appellant. Cause argued by
Robert Harrison for respondent, W. II. Larew
7 4 rD. fore ~ n la lr.1f1G q llai tod
! Sac. 73-Merced County VS.. Devin ct al
Cause argued by Deputy Attorney General c.
! \. Post tor respondent, G. Mic ener in reply
! for appellant and submitted
! 1S.3O1-Prouty VS.. DevIn ct aI-No appear
ance: submitted upon briefs on file.
| Court adjourned to 10 a. N. Monday, No
! vember 8, 1898.
THURSDAY, November IA, 1895.
Court met at 10:l5 a. IN. Present, AIctar-
land, j., presiding; Henshaw, j.; Temple. J.:
Butterworth, Deputy Clerk; Girvin, Acting
! Bailitf.
| sac. 23-Little VS.. Caldwell-On motion of
/ y. d. Mason, ordered that p f. BENSON be
associated win counsel for appellant.
Sac. 43-Murray vs. Murray-Pursuant to
! stipulation. Cause submitted on briefs on file.
/ sac. s2-Warner VS.. Southern Pacific Com
pany-Cau5c argued by General hart for APP
! pelant, by Frank II. Short for respondent.
! General Hart in reply and submitted; appel.
lants supplemental brief ordered stricken out
! filled.
Sac. SO-Dellapiazza VS.. Foley ct al.-Sub-
mitted on briefs on iile
! Recess to = p. M.
Court reconN ened at 2:1O p. m Temple.
j. absent; Garoutte, j., acting in his place
and stead Washburn, BailiIf.
Sac. S2-Holly vs. Heiskell-Cause argued
! by +. d. Edwards for appellant and submit
! ted.
| sac. 86-McBean VS.. City of Fresuo-Cause
argued By w. c. Graves Tor appellant, by l..
! W. MouitFie for respondent and submitted
! sac. 97-Belby VS.. Ackenzie-Cause argued
! with Sac. So and submitted.
! sac. 23-Littie VS.. aldwell-Cause argued
| by A. D. Mason for appellant, by j. NJ. Mall
ing for respondent, by A. d. Mason i'll reply
! and submitted.
| Sac. 5o-Trevaskis VS.. Peard ct al.-C Ause
argued by a. ID. Mason for appellant. by
Charles W. Kits for respondent, by A. d.
! Mason in reply and submitted
sac. 64-Cnne IS. RoDbinS--Cause argued
| by Thomas 5. Ford for appellant, by j. N.
| Walling ior respondent and submitted
Adjourned 70 o a. IN. Monday