The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1895-06-18

Denver, defendants. You are hereby re-
quired TO appear in an action brought
against you by the above named plalntiu
in the District Court of the Third judi
cial District of the Territory of Utah, and
to answer the complaint filed therein
within ten days exclusive OF the DAY OF
Service) after the service on you or TINS
summons-if served within this county
or, if served out of this county, but IN
this district, within twenty days; otner-
wise within forty dayS-or judgment Dy
default will be taken against you. ac-
cOrding to the prayer of said complaint
The said action is brought to have de-
. cree OF this Court for the foreclosure OF
a certain mortgage executed by defend-
ants Goldman, Boehmer, ReinSsen, Ware,
Laura Z. Dieter, Wolf and Johnson, Au-
gust l. 1891, upon premises hereinafter uee-
scribed, given to secure the payment or
twelve certain promiSsory notes of even
date Herewith, each for $1,000 with inter-
est from date at 10 per cent per annuIn,
executed by defendants Simon Goldman,
Fred Boehmer, j. w. HelnSSen, Isaac
Ware, Laura Z. Dieter, N 7. Johnson,
and said Maurice Wolf, to one Charles j.
Hubbard, same being due and wholly I'M
paid save interest TO August ], 1894; 10
have said premises sold, and proceeds ap-
piled in payment of amount found due on
said notes, with interest, attorneys fees,
amounts paid out for taxes. with interest
and costs; that plaintiff have a detl-
cheney Judgment against makers or Salu
notes, and judgment against defendant,
Dora Rinehart, for $1,000; said Rinehart
having purchased part of said prem,
notes; and for other relief: said notes
and mortgage having been duly assigned
to plaintiff, who is now the holder there
of; said premises are situate in Salt
Lake County, Utah. and described as fol-
lows: First, lots l, 10. II. &c, 30, 81, 81
49, 81. 80, So 81. So. 80. 40, II, y, block
/: lots l, Is. II. IS, Y, u, block 2; lots !,
16 II, 26. 26, Y. block 8; lots Il, .. block
/; lots 1, 16. 2e. q, q, block 3. Second,
lots ,, 8. 4. ., g. T. s. 9, 10, II u, 49,, II,
10, is. 10, 20, q. -, %, a %. block /; lots
,, 3. (, .. g. Z, s. 9, 10. II. u, 13, II, 10, Is,
10, %, p, 20. % "a. -. % % 30. 81, g., 81
81 So, &c. 81. IS, SO. 70. Al. block .: lots
10 20. p, -, %. "a .. Is, %. so. 81, -. 80,
IS IS IS fS 90 90 81 f. g. BLOCK :: lots z
5, 4, 3, 8, 7, S, g. TO- IL u, -. "A, Is, %, .,
"a, ,, rs, %, 80, ST. 81 SO, "a, 80, 80, 81, IS,
50, 40. A. block .. Third, lots ?, 3, 4. ., o,
Z, s. 9, 10, II, y, IS, a. 10 % ., 2, %, y,
80, 81, -, SO. 81, 50, 80. 81. IS, block 4, sit
uate in South Boulevard" Addition,
which is a subdivision of lots and 10;
/ Survey.
( And you are hereby notified that if you
/ fail to appear and answer the said COM
/ plant as above required, the said plain
/ tiff will apply TO the Court for the reflex
| demanded therein.
Witness the Hon. Samuel a Mer-
rift, Judge. and the seal Of the Dis
/ (SeaI) District in and for the Territory OF
Utah, this Sth day of June, in the
I year of our Lord one thousand
eight hundred and ninety-hye.
| DAVID c. DUNBAR, Clerk
| BY GEORGE D. LOOMS Deputy Clerk.
! WILLIAMS, VAN COTT r SUTHER-
| LAND. Attorneys for Plaintiff.