The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1895-01-26
AGREE TO faRT
~ Divorce Case to Be
hnfcably Settled.
- CHESTER sTkwART.


- ~ xlvsn I'D his claim for ~. 900
- H1s.a1 Mary PoHsius Dyer How
-: - wiII be little difficnity about
-. - the parties ssern 20 be
sss, SIlna On TIE proposition Of living
rha attorneys for the couple
- fesxaay engaged in preparing
1IIsmi papers, and It Is stated
1fi6S4e1v that WREN these papers
& ~ s.. Witch will be in day or two,
e osfpundlns allegations Of the
ss1d BILL Of particulars. and
4 - serwzx. viii have been es,mina4-
b. - ~ s5ss basis on which 10
~ eecree viii be abandonment
- viii then be brought into
{ - prar4icaEiy 80 uncurfested-
I5yxr ease, as far as the public
s;li1fulnsd. detes from DeceHsber is,
s11,an The husbands complaint was
4 he saseeriof court. 1t contained
f1yss which cast serious refiec-
= Mr.. Dyer. and the charges.
teess served twenty days pre-
i51TI7l Mere accompanied BY demand
= Iii Of particulars. The bill OF
Idllsinis oausc December "a, and were
= $50 = bad as the complaint.
"a s<seer was filed Januarys7, and
~ Mrs. Dyer's side Of the con-.
if1lg. she said that the false and
6I1 11lots bill Of psrticularss had been
- r. pnfMfHnce OF a threat that
- n8uld dIsgsace and ruin her IL
M fnd 10 live with him and sup
-; that unless she gave him
- ~ would pursue her in The
80 n such . way a. to cover her
s6ma
- - h answer to allegations that
pn3t u pusiic places. but in their
- IN conduct had been rampant:
~ ~ frequently abused HIM and
- II him: that In the presence OF
RI NptBeF and brythefs and sister she
- oeci,eFofned to order him to shut
Nostb: snd on one occasion, In the
aes u their hired girl, she neearne
pjthgsit cause. struck him on the
called him vile names, cufxsed
- nd she wished he was dead
Il heil: that she finally lef4 fhs
- Il ne night and he was com
- = - out and look for her; but
tnctAled herself and watched what
e9Id - She was said also to have
te1eR 10 his Office. and IN the
1s of HIS stsnographer and clerk
- sbnsed and disgrared him. aud
~ % avoid the TRADE he was
1 - leave hsr In possession whi,e
- railing ST him.
4 sebiy 20 These allegations Mrs
- I'D that daEing their married
~ ~ everything in her power TO
IT husband to get ON In his
and profession and IN estab-
business credit Tor him in the
sanity. To that end. she GAYS.
ne him upwards Of $500, with
- p purchase law library. to
~ p61ftieai expenses and assess-
- ss,d to maintain and eupport
mfsher. hat she turned over 70
3 hFEe part or the money re-
80 sy Der from loans made upon
pperty and from other sources.
Showed him to control and man.
oe senA "A part OF this money. IL
aIeged. he used In paying saxes
assessments ON her property and II,
setax Cor buildings and other I'M
avsnsnts. and the rest he appropriate
e ~ own individual use.
o1G ~ sip-a claim for aIianpny nm
assht5cn THAI he had up to tbs
:. s. Their separation casirrfbuted All
Ecoms from the law business ana
- Ae wages IA q mensber OF The
sentfe. to meet tho expenses az
: sousenold and to pay for improve
snd The taxes on her property
ned 20 have had large deposits
ney IN various banks In this CITY
- Hsse N the end everything wis
ss.ss On the other hand. Mrs
8 ~ dssiared that her husband had
-. J ssecs been dead load. and that IN
8 contributing anything she had
- saissd upon to provide for him.
81 49, vas Que 5000 or 81. GOO. not ,,,s,r,f,
Wn IA Ballard and land h, Kitsan
- sitlc. M s'ss'' ann q
= esse was set for hearing yester-
- sat continuance was granted
a snen U is finally brought before
art II viii IN all likelihood he
49,. sse qaietest and least Interesting
SsW96g efsr sraotss