The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1895-12-12
MORE DIVORCES GRANTED
Concluding Arguments in Case of
DWyer VS.. Union Railroad Co.

In the appellate division OF the supreme
Court today several petitions for divorce
wee heard by judges Stiness and Tilling-
hast. The following order is issued by
clerk Baisdell:
"No ice is hereby given that Friday,
Dec. l3, 1895, will he the last dav for
nearing uncontested petitions for divorce
until further notice.
Before Tillinghast, j.:
Annie BurgesOn VS.. Charles A. Burge-
son. Non-support. Granted.
James Morrell VS.. Louisa Morreu.
Adultery. Granted. I. W. Robinson
for petitioner.
Amelia Doulet VS.. Joseph NJ. Donlet.
Desertion, non-support continued drunk
eness. T.. w. Robinson for petitioner.
Mary c. DALEY vs.. Walter f. Daily.
Non-support and extreme cruelty. T.. Il.
Warner for petitioner.
Naomi T.. Wilson VS.. Samuel II. Wat
son. Desertion and non-support. Granted
and petitioner give the custody of her
minor child. o. l.. Bosworth for petitioner.
Dosertion. Granted Cooke x Angel
for petitioner.
Mary Eta Bates VS.. Malvin Z. Bates.
Desertion and non-support. Granted.
John p. Fox for petitioner.
Before Stiness, j.:
Celine Thalman VS.. Paul Thalman.
Non-support. Granted Edward q An
gell for petitioner.
John Dryden va. Elizabeth Dryden.
Continued drunkenness. Il. NJ. Bos-
worth for petitioner.
DENY NEGLIGENCE.
The taking OF testimony in behalf OF
the defendant in the suit OF James
pwyer Jr., against the Union Railroad
Company was resumed before Judge
Wilbur this morning. Several witnesses
were introduced by the defendant TO
hat hn A. fnh pfr no
carrysll in which the plaintiff was when
the accident occurred was going at the
rate of three or four miles and our along
Hospital street and that the motorman
sounded the gong on the car just before
ii crossed South street. Two young men
also testified thar they warned the men in
the carryall, who were driving very fast,
to be careful and not get struck by the
car. The plaintiff and his two COM
panions denied that they heard the warn
ing.
David 8. Baker, for the defendant
closed his argument just before noon and
j. NJ Brennan Immediately began sum
ming up for the plaintiff. A motion for
non-suit made by the defendants yes
terday was denied.
None of the cases on the calendar was
ready for trial in this division of the
court today.
The following civil cases were heard
DyJuuIe SWeetInnu anu AssOCldle JuuRe
Reuckert in the district court today:
Samuel l.. Blaisdell VS.. Alphouse Shack
ford. Decision for plaintiff for $50. 36.
Lucius r.. Miller VS.. Richard j. Reeves.
Decision for plaintiff for $40 and costs.
Edward A. Albro and wife vs. Mary
Knutton. Decision for plaintiff for $50
and costs.
-DnlAn. executor Us. lanes
Dolan. Decision Tor plaintiff for S259. 60.
Clarence Kinsbury VS.. James X. Snow.
Decisionfor plaintiff for s2. So and costs.
Joseph Morrogodsky VS.. Richard Web
ber Decision for plaintiff for $50 and
costs.
James Cady VS.. John Mclaughlin. De-
cision for plaintiff for possession and
costs.
j. Frederick VS.. Herbert Il. Cate. De-
cision for the defendant for costs.
Henry A. Atkins We. Louise NJ. Hop
kms. Decision for plaintiff for sl32. 81
and costs.
Frank T.. ..Corbett vs. Thomas J. Lovett.
Decision for plaintiff for s1S and costs.
Frank T.. Corbett vs.. J. &. Mccoy. De-
cision for plaintiff for 20 and costs.
Louis Koreb V. Isaac Mendelovitz. De-
cision for plaintiff for $50 and costs.