Catoctin clarion., 1895-09-12
No. Il?
GlARlNG FALlACIES.
Crude aud Unsound Views From Sound
Money State.


Senator William u. Chandler Of New
Hampshire declares himself as stead
fastly opposed to tho gold standard and
in favor Of Nree coinage under all inter-
national agreement at ratio Of 151a
Or lG to 1. In letter in which he de-
fines his position he says, "That man
knows nothing who will deny that if
both ceased to be money metals an ounce
of silver would be worth as much as
ono-sixteenth of an ounce of gold"
Senator Chandler differs from tho other
silvortcs only in believing that the
United States cannot alone make the
valuo Of 10 ounces Of silver worth one
Of gold, but in other respects he holds
oil tho false doctrines Of the cheap dol
lar school His views as to the origin Of
the value Of gold and silver are exactly
those Of the fiat money advocates when
he says, lit is the use Of the two (gold
and silver) as money metals that gives
each all Of its value worth considering"
That such glaring fallacies should be
believed by a senator from state which
has always favored sound money is an
indication Of the popular confusion as to
the real nature Of value. Senator Chan
dlor would Indignantly deny that he
wished to aid in the reputation Of
debts or to establish the silver standard
instead of gold. But his arguments are
exactly the same as those OH which the
Populists base their schemes for cheat
ing creditors and debasing the standard
Of value.
The bold assertion that If both met
ais ceased to be used as money 16 ounces
of silver would be worth ono Of gold is
purely guesswork OH the part Of Senator
Chandler, and has no support in past
history or present conditions. If what
he saye were true there must have been
established by nature a fixed ratio be.
tween silver and gold. Such a supposi-
tion is nonsense, as nature has no moro
to do with ratios than with the number
of buttons Oh coat. Since gold is now
worth 32 times as much us silver, 1t
would seem that to deprive them Of
their use as money would affect both
alike Senator Chandler thinks that tho
result would be to decrease the value Of
gold twice rs much as Of silver, but Of
fers no proof that such would be tho
case.
Tho theory that it is tho use Of gold
and silver as money which gives them
nearly all their value is another fiat
money fallacy, the source Of tho green
back delusion. The facts are just the re-
verse Of what Senator Chandler says.
Instead Of being valuable because they
are used for money, gold and silver are
used for money because they arc valua-
bic as metals Before either was used
as a measure Of value gold and silver
had value Of their own and would
continue to be valuable if their use as
money entirely ceased. Of this there
can be no question, since in countries
which have no metallic money these
metals have commercial value, which
in tho case Of gold is equal to its coin
ago value. If Senator Chandler were
right, gold and silver would be practi-
cally worthless in countries which did
not coin those metals into money.
There are other equally grave blum
ders in Senator Chandlor's profession Of
financial faith, but tho above will be
sufficient to show that ho is an unsafe
leader for Americans who want sound
currency aud an honest dollar.