The record-union. [volume] (Sacramento, Calif.) 1891-1903, 1895-11-14
SUPREME COURT.
(In Bank }

SACRAMENTO, Nov Is, 1895.
L. A. 26-Foote VS.. Mccarthy ct ably the
court: pom the foregoing stipulation, 1t Is
ordered that the appeal herein be and the
same is hereby dismissed. Beatty, c. j., No
vember IL, 1895.
Ext No. j. ). Wilson VS.. DR.. William
Naumann, etc.-Twenty days additional time
to file transcript in said cause is hereby
granted. Beatty, c. j.
5. +. 94-White VS. Superior Contribute
discharged and application denied. Van
Fleet, j. We concur: Garoutte, j.; Harrison,
j.; Mcfarland. j.; Henshaw, j.; Beatty, Z. J.
s. +. 11S-White VS.. Superior Court-Wr it
dismissed. Van Fleet, j. We concur: Ga
route, j.; Harrison, j.; Mcfarland, j.: Hen
shaw. j.; Beatty, Z. j.
L. A. 27-Hass VS.. Mutual Relief Associa
ton. BY the court: Rehearing denied
Sac. 92-Tulare County VS.. May ct ais
Motion to have cause heard at Sacramento
session In November, 1895, denied. Beatty,
c. J.
Department One.)
WEDNESDAY, Novemb Der 13, 1895.
Court met at 10 a. m. Present Harrison, j..
presiong; Garoutte, j.; Van Fleet. j.; john
son, Deputy Clerk Washburn. Bailih.
sac. 3l-Meyers VS.. Nelson ct al.-Pursu-
ant to stipulation, submitted upon briefs on
lille.
Sac. 49-Conlan VS. Sullivan ct als.-Pursu-
ant to stipulation, submitted upon briefs on
tile.
s,356-sehorn VS. Williams. Auditor
Pursuant to stipulation. submitted upon
briefs on file
sac. 46-Eppinger Il Co. VS. Kendrick-
pursuant 10 stipulation, submitted upon
Grim 32-People etc vs. Wong Chung
Suey-Cause argued by j. j. Scrivner for APP
pe!lant, Deputy Attorney General Charles H.
JACKSON LOT respondent, }. j. Scrivner in re-
ply and submitted.
GRIM. 41-I'eope, etc, VS.. Miller ct AIN o
appear nee for appellant; submitted upon
brle.s on Iile.
sac. l2-Rozecrans Mining Company VS..
MOr6y-i Hngp 4rUnp6 nv Il Pa pOnpl-
liant.
Recess to p. M.
Court reconvened at = p. ~. Argument re-
sumed by Judge Williams for RESPONDENT, A.
Everett Ball in reply and submitted.
Court adjourned to 10 a. m. tomorrow.
10, 9O9-Hawley vs. Gray Bros. Art. Stone
ana Pavlng Company-Judgment and order
a1hrmed. by the court.
sac 2'-halnes etc, VS.. Snediear-Judg-
ment appealed from is reversed and cause re-
manded tor new tIial. Commissioners.
Harrison, j.; Garoutte, j.; Van Fleet, j.
,. +. 27-Hibernia Savings and Loan So
clety VS.. Clark-Judgmen and decree re-
Versed and cause renanded for further pro-
ceedings. Commissioners. Harrison, j.; Ga
route, j.; Van Fleet, J.
Department Two)
WEDNESDAY, November 49, 1895.
Court met at 10 . a. IN. Present Mctar-
land, j., presiding; Henshaw, j.; Temple, j.;
Butterworth, Deputy Clerk; Girvin, Acting
Baillff.
1s,434-Smile VS.. Fresno County-Sub-
united on brIe of appellant.
sac. 2-Ah Tong, alias VS.. Quong Hing VS..
The Earl Fruit CJmpany-Submitted on
briefs on file.
Sac. Reid VS.. Reid-Cause argued by
Frank H. short for appellant, by E. ID. Ed
wards for respondent, IN reply by Frank Ii.
Short and submitted.
Sac. 39-Silver Creek and Pacific L. and
W. Co. ct al. VS.. hayes ct al Cause argued
by n. Z. Briggs Tor appellant and w Z.
thompson tor respondent ana submitted.
Sac. 42-MckenZie VS. Scott Union and
National Insurance Company-Sabmitted on
briefs.
Grim. S6-The People etc. VS.. Smith-Pur-
suant to stipulation, cause submitted on
briefs on tile.
1S,420-The 20 Land and Water Company
VS.. Abbott-Appeal dismissed.
Grim 66-People VS.. Sternberg-Arguedb by
Charles II. jackson, Deputy Attorney Gen
eral tor people; CIV. Cross for appellant, and
submitted.
Grim. 65-Argued with Grim. 66 by C. w.
Cross tor appellant and submitted.
Court adjourned till O "a. IN Tomorrow
,3S2-Le verone VS.. Hildreth-The iudo.
ment and order offrmed. The court.
1875 56-Matter of insolvency OF j. A. Pat
ton Judgment reversed and court below in.
structed to overruie demurrer. Commission.
ers. Mcfarland, j.; Henshaw, j.; Temple j
is, 444-Henigan VS.. Ervin-A ppeals from
judgment and order dismissed. Commission.
ers. Mcfarland, j.; Henshaw, j. Temple j