The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1895-06-22
TINWARE
~ DAVIDSON. Receiver

stated that The amount OF money found on
Pages person was SSiAso.
Fsa was asked II IN q conversation held
with HASTE some time ago he said he took
no stock irs the drug theory. The witness
sad ha dsa not in the way Mr.. Haste put
il. he said he told MIR. HASTE he did not
know what 20 think OF Pages condition,
hnt thought he had been drugsad with
something.
M-. piles asked the chief several cues
,sors which were overruled. and finally
asksi hirr, what ne said 10 Mr.. Haste dur
sng This conversation in regard 20 the eye
witnesses 10 the tragedy and he said he
told HASTE they were bunko thieves
Or p. p. NJ Miller was called by the de-
ssrza He said hzshessh Is commonly
called a drug in his profession. Its first
effect on a person would De exniiaratoh'
tntoxication. Authorization and then pros
tra,ton. II the hasheesh was active 1t
might take two teaspoonfuls 10 produce
INCONSISTENCIES.
m George Nswlands took the stand at
the beginning Of the afternoon session. lie
said thar the natural conclusi ons 10 ne
drawn from, the testimony Of Mr. Baxter
and Or. shannon on the eondltion or
Mr.. Page was that there was something
Inside alcohol &c cause the condition or
the defendant. He gave materially the
same evidence on the causes of Pages
condition as given by Drs. shannon and
Miller. The doctor was handed a pelEiS
belonging 70 some poor departed being,
and described 10 the jury the exact 10
cation OF the peIvis in the human BODY.
Mr.. Lewis asked the witness what posi-
ton a weapon would nave 10 % IN 70
take the course described by DR.. Kline
on mis- examination two days before.
OBJECTION by the state being overruled,
th.. question was repeated:
what position vas the victim in Tor
the bullet TO have taken the course de-
scrihad?" The body must have been
bent forward al almost right angles was
the answer.
Counsel for the state cross-examined
the Witness in the same line as the other
experts. with about the same result.
DR.. voorhees, testified to the effects OF
hasheesh. His testimony was substantially
the same as that preceding. Mr.. Lewis
then asked him 10 tell what position me
l,odv would be in 10 produce the wound
OF deceased. In prepounding the Ques-
ton. MIR. Lewis in naming over the por-
lions of the body in regard TO the wound.
made use of words of ten syllables and
seventy letters. which dumbfounded the
fury. His croes-examination disclosed
about the same facts as that OF previous
witnesses.
Robert Tozier. barkeeper in the Nevada
IN.
last February he ran Johnson out or the
saloon because he used loaded dice Oh a
man, but the question was ruled out.
F. A Higgins, at one time mayor or
Milwaukee. testified that he knew Page
in Milwaukee and that Pages Teputa-
ton was always first class.
II. c. Gordon. deputy county clerk
stated that he lived in Mitchell, ). d,
from 1889 10 1891, and that Pages repu-
tation was always good
William Sledge, a colored man who for
merly lived in Mitchell. knew Page to be
a peaceful. lsw-abiding citizen.
Prof. Friars, principal of Snohomish
schools. was professor in the university
a Mitchell from 1890 to 1893. and knew
Pages reputation to be good.
Mrs. A VI. Moore. OF Mount vernon.
lived in Mitchell, and said Pages reputa-
ton was good.
f. E. Teachnor, professor OF SCHOOLS 81
Van ASSET, lived in Mitchell from lSs1
to 1890. and also testified TO Pages good
reputation. He was asked II rage ala
not have a reputation for playing poker,
and said he played little poker AT times
with his friends.
c. j. Johnson, OF Tacoma, who lived
in Mitchell from October. 1856. 10 May IL,
1915. and who was clerk of the circuit
court for two terms, stated that Pages
reputation was very good in that city.
il. T. Curl. OF Tacoma knew rage III
Mitchell. and said his general reputa-
ton was good. He was not cross-eXafn-
ined, and the defense then rested its case.
Counsel for the state asked for time In
which to marshal their witnesses in re-
buttal. stating that they have not had
time to properly attend 10 that portion or
the proceedings. because Of the larger
number of witnesses being introduced
than they had any conception OF. Coun-
At 9azs1 TOD q n
granted the request adjourning until this
morning at go O'Clock.