The times. (Owosso, Mich.) 1882-1897, 1895-11-01

Would Decrease the Weight OF the Gold
or Increase That of the Silver Dollar.
| Prescriptions of Different Ratios to he
Continued During Life of Patient.
Governor Stone of Missouri is an ar
dent advocate of cheap dollars and de-
nounces all who favor our present finan-
cial system as being guilty of "unre-
lenting hostility to silver" In speech
at Sedalia, Mo-, he declared in favor of
the immediate opening of the United
States minis to the free coinage of sill
yer at II to 1 and said: eff after q fair
trial it is demonstrated that we cannot
ON that ratio maintain both metals in
circulation at a parity, then congress can
at any time in the future do what it has
done in the past-change the ratio by
decreasing the amount of gold in the
gold dollar, or it can increase the
amount Of silver in the silver dollar, or
1t can do both. "
This is q fair sample of silverite logic
and shows clearly the lack of any well
defined principle in the so cent dollar
agitation. 1t is only fair to Governor
Stone to say that his plan of establish
ing permanent ratio of 16 to 1 be-
tween gold and silver by making the
gold dollar smaller is not original with
him. The idea is taken from that repos-
itory OF misinformation ON the money
question-"Coin' Financial School. T"
That the governor of an important state
should indorse such q dishonest PROPOSE
ton is merely evidence of the incapaci-
ty for reasoning which the free coinage
craze produces in its victims.
If Governor Stone really understood
the money question, on which he pre-
sumes to instruct the people of Missouri,
he would know that reducing the size
of the gold dollar would do nothing to-
ward fixing the commercial value of sill
yer at 16 to of gold. 1t is the 90 2-10
grains Of pure gold which is the unit of
value. The same number of grains of
pure silver are worth about one thirty
second as much. If the unit Of value
were made 30, 10 or 10 grains, the re-
lation between the value of gold and
silver would not be altered in the least.
What would happen would be that every
contract made payable in dollars would
be cut down in proportion to the reduc-
ton in the weight of the unit, thus rob-
bling by law all creditors of part of
their property. The real value of gold
or silver in relation to other commodi-
ties would not change, but the term
"dollar" would mean less value than it
does now. In other words, decrease in
the weight Of the gold unit would mean
a debasement of the currency similar to
increasing the quantity of cheap metal
used as alloy in coins.
1t cannot be too often pointed out that
in their last analysis all cheap money
schemes, and especially the free coinage
Of silver, Involve positive dishonesty
ON the part of the government. Goods
having been sold, capital loaned or con-
tracts for payment of wages made or
standard of value established by con-
gress it is coolly proposed that the value
of goods, capital or wages shall be cut
down by decreasing the measure of val
ues. Such action might be popular with
some creditors and employees, who
would be able to escape from part of
their obligations. But every principle of
common honesty and justice would
stamp legislation for that purpose as
fraudulent and opposed to the best inter-
ests in the long run of debtors as we'll
as creditors. Civilized societies have
long passed the stage when it was
thought just and expedient to repudiate
lawful obligations.
Governor Stones alternative PROPOSE
ton to increase the amount of silver in
the "dollar" is not open to the charge
of dishonesty if he means that the coins
should contain as much silver as would
be worth a gold dollar. But if this plan
is honest it is also absurd and would be