The San Francisco call. [volume] (San Francisco [Calif.]) 1895-1913, 1895-08-11

gvrostat. and it's kinetic stability was the
force was wrestling with. That was my
first conscious experience with kinetlc sta
bility and | can tell you IL has chung to
me ever since, and so long as | live l shall
never believe in the scientific dogma OF in
herent forces, either in matter or organ
isms. l shall never believe that the attrac-
ton of matter is other than delusion and
the evolution of species other than mere
law in nature which depends for Its excu-
ton on forces which are controlled by a
power which resides outside and Is indie
pendent of all organisms.
Now, although kinetic stability was
known to the world before was born, yet
[ believe | have discovered fact or a prin-
ciple Whichever you like to call it) so con-
nected with it as to revolutionize our ideas
on many subjects.
First, then: Science does not believe
that kinetic stability will overcome gravity.
Now, know, and have proven the fact
to my own satisfaction, that q projectile
travelling a distance of fifty feet in half a
second barely falls one foot six inches in that
time, although by the law of gravity it
should fall four feet in that time.
If the proiectile be made to travel $50
feet in half a second it falls little over
eight inches in that time, whereas accord
ing to the law of gravity it should fall four
feet.
Now, although Professor Stringham of
Berkeley tells US he can explain all the
motions of the gyroscope and the bicycle
and other cases of kinetic stability by
means of mathematics, yet 1 defy either
him or Professor LIE Conte to explain the
above facts by mathematics or by any
other principle than the one / have dis
covered and explained in my pamphlet
Professor Soule and others have acknowl-
edged that If kinetic stability Will do what
l have stated above, then the attraction of
matter can no longer be acknowledged to
be the cause of gravity.
Furthermore, experiment shows that the
resultant OF two transverse energies is not
straight line, but curve Now, that is
caused by kinetic stability, and if Pro-
lessor Stringham will explain that by
mathematics before l have given the proof
in these papers will be surprised.
Again, can show that the weight of
bodies is caused by their kipetic stability,
and if any professor in the Leland Stan
ford University will explain that by math-
ematics in The CALL / will be still further
surprised and gratifed.
And to crown all. this princ1ple of
kinetic stability will enable me to prove
that matter itself is not an entity, but only
Inc resultant OF certain motions; that, in
Iact, all the phenomena which we call the
universe, matter included, are the result
OF certain energies. They are the produc-
uon OF the work of power behind the
scene; and they represent in amount of
energy exactly the work expended on
them, and when called upon they will
give Dack again In the shape of force to
the qulntlllionth part of a foot pound all
the power expended on them.
Another fact which mathematics, even
IN the hands of Its greatest master, Profess
sor H. e. TAFT, cannot at present explain:
How body with perfect freedom of mo-
ton, such as the sun (before the planetary
system was produced d., could be made to
produce sufficient incandeseence by rota-
ton along with kinetic energy, so as to
evolve nebuious atmosphere of sufficient
capacity to meet the requirements of the
planetary system. Kinetic stability ena-
Dles US, with the assistance, of Joules'
equivalent, to calculate exactly what the
ratio OF the energy of translation must