The record-union., 1895-05-10
SUPREME COURT.
pEPARTMENT ONE,

DEPARTMENT ONE
SACRAMENTO, Thursday, May 9, 1895.
Court met at 10 O'Clock A. NJ. Present:
Harrison, j., presiding: Garoutte, j.; Van
Fleet, j. Marshall, Deputy Clerk; Washburn,
Bailiff
21,l91-The People, etc., VS.. Johns-Argued
by G. N. Post, Deputy Attorney-General. for
respondent; no appearance for appellant.
Cause submitted.
1s,426-The People. etc. VS.. Evans-Mason,
appellant, VS.. Culbert etc, respondent
Argued by John f. Davis for respondent: no
appearance for appellant Cause submitted.
.333-Cooper VS.. Miller-Argued by d.
NJ. Aiberry for appellant; argued by W. y.
Belcher for respondent; argued IN reply by H.
NJ. Alberry for appellant. Cause submltted
1S,4O3-Ludy VS.. The County of Colusa-
Argued by NJ. j. Keyes for appellant: no up
pearance for respondent. Cause submitted.
Recess, 1880 to 2.
S,32l-Hopkins ct al vs. Warren ct al
Argued by Frank II, Short for respondent;
no appearance for appellant. Cause SUD-
mitted
HIS 326-Garberino vs. Roberts-Argued by
James Gallagher for appellant; argued by
Frank II. Short for respondent; argued in re-
ply by James Gallagher for appellant. Cause
submitted
1S,349-O'Brien vs. The New Zealand In
surance Company-Upon suggestion OF the
death of Thomas II. O'Brien, plaintiff and re-
spondent, it is ordered that l.. III. Church, ad-
minisIrator OF the estate of said deceased,
Thomas III. o Brien, be substituted as plaintLif
and respondent in this cause-Argued by L..
l.. Cory Tor appellant; argued by j. L. Meux
for respondent. Cause submitted.
Is, 352-Moore VS.. Hamersl slag-Argned by
j. A. Hannah for appellant argued by N. q.
Caldwell for respondents; argued in reply by
j. A. Hannah Tor appellant. Cause sub
mitted
S,346-Splnney VS.. Downey ct al-Argued
by Il. l.. Corey for appellant; argued by Frank
II. Short for respondent; argued, in reply. by
L. l.. Cory for appellant. Cause submitted.
Adjourned to tomorrow morning.
DEPARTMENT TWO
SACRAMENTO, Thursday, May 9. 1895.
Court met at 10 o'clock A. NJ. Present: Nc
Farland, j., presiding; Temple, j.; Henshaw,
j. McCraney, Deputy Clerk; Girvin, Acting
Bailiff
S,3S2-Leverone vs.. Hildreth-In accord
ance with stipulation filed cause submitted
upon briefs on file.
S,3S4-Emmons VS.. Barton-Argued by
L. L. Cory for appellant; argued by George Z.
Church for respondent; argued in reply by l..
L. Cory for appellant. cause submitted.
1S,4O9-The First National Bank of Fresno
VS.. Dusy ct al.-Cause submitted upon briefs
on file.
1s,443-Boyce as administrator. vs. Fisk
in accordance with stipulation on file, cause
submitted upon briefs on file.
,41o-Weaver VS.. Mckay ct al.-Argued
by Milton E. Babbfor appellant: argued by J..
II. McGofley for respondent; argued in reply
by Milton h. Babb for appellant. Cause sub
mitted
,429-Eppinger ct al. VS.. Scott, etc
Cause submitted by agreement upon briefs
now on file.
1s,453-Emigrant Ditch Company vs. Web
ber-Arguea by Frank II. Short for appellant;
argued by L. l.. Cory for respondent; argued
in reply by Frank Ii. Short for appellant.
Cause submitted.
1S,449-Richter VS.. Henningsan ct al
Continued.
21196-People vs. Short Submitted.
Court adjourned to tomorrow.
5.S4S-Bancroft VS.. Baneroft-The judg-
ment is affirmed. Mcfarland, j. We concur:
Henshaw, j.; Temple, j.
IN BANK.
SACRAMENTO, Thursday. May 9, 1895.