The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1895-05-25

where, to enact them into laws, not
withstanding his veto, let us, as last
resort, suspend the rules and put them
into a general appropriation bill, With
the distinct understanding that If the
people can get no relief, the govern
ment can get no money These are
the words of the same distinguished
statesman, who, at Memphis and Gov
ington, assures the people that there
is now no need of relief, and that we
have only to enjoy the prosperity
guaranteed by gold standard.
MIR. Carlisle in discussing the legal
ratio, assumes that the United states
can accomplish no more by free coin
age than our little neighbor, Mexico,
and overlooks entirely the effect which
Will be produced upon the value OF
silver bullion by the unlimited use of
it in the United States In other words
he does not take into consideration the
fact that the United States is, in COM
mercial standing. more than ten times
as great as Mexico, and he does not
take into consideration the fact that
an increased demand such as would be
furnished by the United States, will
effect the price of that portion of sill
yer which falls upon the market.
Wherein He Failed.
''In estimating the amount Of gold
available for coinage annually, he fails
to consider the great increase in the
consumption Of gold in the arts, and
the increase in commerce in the last
100 years. Mr.. Carlisle holds out no
hope of International bimetallism, but
insists that ii is the duty of this gov
eminent TO maintain a gold standard,
and tries to show that it will cause an
appreciation in the value Of the silver
dollar.
AT the Memphis convention, Mr..
Catchings insisted that opponents of
silver were expecting international BIZ
metalliSm. This seeming conflict be
tween Mr.. Carlisle and Mr.. Catchings
can be easily explained. Mr.. Carlisle
believed that the government should
buy whatever silver it needs, and
therefore might be called a 'buy-met-
allist.' Mr.. Catchings is in favor of
the restoration of silver after a
while, if other nations will help US,
and therefore may be called by
and-by-metallist.'
No English Bankers.
What need is there for bimetallism
if the gold standard will furnish a
sufficient amount of money? The con-
fession that bimetallism is desirable
destroys all argument advanced in
behalf of gold monometallism, and
when one mas aQmlIleQ the ueSlfdDll-
ity of bimetallism he must either IA
vor the restoration Of it by the United
States alone or submit the destinies
of this people to foreign nations. 1t
has been well said that it is more
dangerous to put an English banker
at the head of our financial system
than to have an English admiral at
the head of our navy or an English
general at the head Of our army"
Deserted the Masses.
Mr. Bryan discussed various phases
of the money question, quoting fire.
quently from Senator Carlisle and an
swering his arguments by arguments
formerly made by Secretary Carlisle
or by statistics. He closed by saying
that Secretary Carlisle had deserted
the struggling masses for wnom he
formerly spoke, but that even with
out his leadership they would be able
to cast their ballots for the restora-
ton of the gold and silver coinage of
the constitution, and-th the present
efforts of Secretary Carlisle, instead
of retarding the movement, would
make his former speech familiar to
the American people and show them
the danger of entrusting our financial
policy to the idle holders of idle
capital, or to their representatives,"
A pure cream of tartar baking pow
der brought by infinite labor to the
highest degree of perfectiOn-Dr,