The Evening dispatch. [volume] (Provo, City, Utah) 1891-1895, 1895-03-20
ALIAS


Summons under amended eomplaint.)
NUMMONS-IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
~ the First judicial District of the territory
of Utah, Utah county.
The Anglo American Land. Mortgage &Ageuey
Co., Limited, of London, a corporation, plain
tiff, VS.. Thomas Z. Earl and Harriet E. Earl,
mis- wife, The Lombard Investment company,
q corporation, and Milton B. whitney, Charles
Laid and Frank Hagerman, receivers of The
Lombard Investment company. defendants
The People of the territory of Utah send
greeting TO Thomas f. Earl and HsrrietJ E.
Earl, his wife, The Lombard Investment COM
pany, corporation. and Milton B, Whitney.
Charles s. Fairchild. Harry E. Mooney, Sam
ford B. Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers
of The Lombard Investment company, de-
PENDANTS.
You are hereby required to appear in an ac-
tion brought against you by the above named
plaintiff, in the district court of the First Ju-
diciat district of the territory of Utah, and to
answer the complaint filed therein, within ten
days exclusive OF the day of Seryice1 after the
service on you of this summons-f served
within this county; or if served out of this
c1unty, but i'll this district, within twenty
days; otherwise within forty days - or
judgment by default will be taken against
you, according to prayer of this com plaint.
The said action is brought to obtain q decree
of this court against the defendants herein for
the sum of Sl,7l2.T0 with interest at IL per
cent. Der annum, from the lst day of January,
A. D., 1895, until paid, and for Sl5O.00 attorney
fees. and for COSTS of SUIT. Plaintiff alleges
that on the 4th day of March, 1890. Thomas F..
and Harriet Il, Earl, his wife. executed and
delivered TO The Lombard Investment COM
pany certain bond in the sum of 81 500 10,
with per cent. interest with annum, per IL
per cent. after maturity That two of said
coupons have not been paid and that the same
with the principal has been declared due and
payable. That on March zlst, 1890. the said
Lombard Co sold and assigned the said note
to plai..titf, who is now the lega holder there
of. and did then and there guarantee the pay
ment of the within note ana principal within
two years from said last mention ed date. That
the usual decree may be made for the sale OF
the said premises to pay said debt, interest,
costs and attorney fees, that the proceeds Of
SAFE may be applied in pay menJ of the amount
due plaintiff, and that said deisndants ard
each of them and all persons claiming under
them or either of them subsequent to the exc
cution OF said mortgage upon said premises,
either as purchasers, encumbrancers or other
wise, may be barred and foreclosed of all
right, claim, equity OF redemption in said
premises and every par thereof, and that the
said plaintiff may have judgment and execu-
tlon against the said defendants Thomas f..
Earl and Harriett K. Earl and 1he Lombard
Investment company, for any deficiency
which may remain after applying the pro-
ceeds OF sale.
For fuLer particulars see copy of complaint
on file.
And you are hereby notified that if you fail
to appear and answer the said complaint as
above required, the said plaintiff VIII apply
to the court for the relief therein demanded,
and costs of suit
Witness the Hon. William H King, Judge,
and the seal of the District court of
the First Judicial district in and for
IsEALl the territory of U tab; this 18th day
OF March, in the year of ourLOrd
one thousand eight hundred and
ninety-ive,
j. W. BEAsLEY. Clerk.
By GEO. HAvERCAMP, Deputy Clerk.
James A. Williams, attorney for plaintiff.