The Newtown bee. (Newtown, Conn.) 1877-current, 1895-10-04


isamed day1 wrote. Sometimes sent them
by hsssebsefi He. brought the fiFi it COW
down. at my. request. i did NOT like' her
and IafteR q, little while he exchanged her
for another. After that z bought Anoth,
efi. That Yas the extent of out COW
trade. No one was present .butmy hired
woman W hen. we made our deals, think.
A celored woman..iTha S65 Iipai ID ford
the Horse and wagon, I raised by doping
boafdeIrgs and selling CALVES: I'll. ! as
...II a..~sIsS0E HIS ASSIGNMENT - -
,i,-.a .Isisz e.In D.. 81 I...- LII. ----.-.4
was made. il paid him for pastuf ling a
cow the GUNNER hefore- II didsnod know
1 was doing to do it.- iHeibn nought
some things down.to my"plaeel after he
sassighed, buteI ithihk he has; taken them
ali back, For All work his, me a and
tesms have. ever. done .oni my. place. in
Monroe, have paid him. II, EN- mPloged
him because. I thought he. woHld do it
better than any one eise'wbuld.." don't
think ! did It with Reference to any pro-
posed. or. contemplated marriage with
him. IL did not depend entirely upon him
In the fall of ls9l.' From the spring of
1892 until he stopped Iadfd depend Almost
entirely upon him to do my work. II
can't say that I,wfote to him telling him
/ depended entirely upon him to 90. .eya
erythip9.. 1 seolded him, =. good many
times about his drinking. and .trfed to
have him reform and did premise TO mar
ry Him. if he would reform, but lie never
did. Never heard bin say when i sco1d-
Led, that ii twas not satisfied he would
pick up his traps and men, and leave.
Never drank. any intoxicating liquors
with him. aDrank' cider with hirh but
never wine; Or anything else So far as 4
can remember. His men would get in=+
toxicatad. !, He never got Al furnace for
me, OF helped aboubgettiugone repaired.'
My letter to him thanking hin, for help.
ing me to have sneh a Hiee FIRE, referred
to his drawing the coal for ME and not to
his helping get the furnace Itffelf. I did
go to Rirmingham to try to borrow 800
for hima- He said he wanted it to pay a
store bill at Edgar F.Hawiey's.- p went
to Mrs Isaac HubbeHs bat could BOT get
lit" Went down twice. r. alt 49,
! Ja..1,a tii..lal I.4a Is ..'I 5.,.IDa ..LS (.
HAD MONEY OF MY, owK'sN' THE BANK y. ,
| l could have lent Rim. but did not want
tOtake5i il oat and. lose interest a01 it,,, i
l.neser. came up. to. .Mitchalps house in
/ Newtewn.s The money / tried to get t6o;fi
him was to be loan. 1 had no partictt.
lar purpose I'M requesting him to come
tdbwn and See me after hts assignment,
tThs AIT tim Hmf he E came % see 5 me me was il
/ August or September, 1891, do not re
member az one time whiting. to Aitche1
that was sorry fofihims ee seeehi im'wer
ry and be so discouraged and thst il hs
would keepup quad coursge all .wogls
leone ont all IjghtaaI daq't knoY Yhaa
be was W.orrying about. II might have
lbeen in, regard to my marrying. him. II
had promised TO marry him baeit was-'s
licondftional promise iat be Would reform
! and i,eceme,a "a sober and q better man. ii
tthink he may haVsitried but the. Hid no
succeed. .,Fn the. spring Of 1891 Iput ou
a hotel sign. remember about going l,
!, see Joe Buzzer about cutting who'd TO
me, Il, wanted 10 cords cut. Mitchell
4tcarted itlfor mes in .lS93sS Homer ,ClarI
-tcarted Il for me in 1885, He did a goo
: adgai Of wofk f6f ME, and SOMETIMES b
,tsent down bis men@i HsnrYs John Ma,
Il thewseand Others A. n1pber OF letter
were shown her, and when asked If. sil
Wrote thef1i,a She replied she could ,pe
itteil ,anlessl she isbufda examine then
When put into hex .hspds,. she Isf foknizs'
them as having been written by her. I'm
tshsaid so.,s The contents, $50 far as read Il
. lcodft.. had reference to business matteI
!, principally, althou gh there would icre
!, out nov. and then ...il i. ai,.a-.l ... s,s
LITTLE IN THE tfNE UF- FRfRNDsHg
,A.l s.t1 4ssi ...sssft.tosto4 s.fi
lpatina. it MILDLY. "A great many .iobie
!. t..tfons wereamade by hesACoansei to. .ape
tions that WE'RE put, to her both al f to m for !.
q aha irrefevahey bpt. the dbjectlbhs we
without exception ruled OUT and opp0
ing counsel seemed to have full s~in,
If Attorney Reecher was appealed to,
to whether f this 4 6r that should be gol
nj iptos he. very aindif ifaFeatly replied, in su
3 stance, 1--WE do not care what you d
We are here under compulsion. Yop 81
EdsMhst,Soti sis' 4, Z h1nd z! Z! +, We pse on
- mInassengeEs.ss, "A, Iaywap ,listaptng to Il
satliuelef itestimony, /, might very, easily hk
= supposed 'tllat assuit forbreach.9 Of pTny
Use MAI WialAs gong 6hsihstgad Sf ,ah liisestil
ktien as. to hpNl lmNch. Sna Fhst Idfspds