The daily morning Astorian. [volume] (Astoria, Oregon) 1883-1899, 1895-02-13
The List Comprises One Hun
dred and Thirty Causes.
VERY FEW CRIMINAL CASES.
Telegraph News From All Parts Of
the World in Condensed
Form.

After several days lavor, Count
Clerk Dunbar has succeeded in gettin
the circuit court docket ready for tn
coming term which commences on tn
18th of the present month. There ar
1870 cases on the docket, very few o
which are criminal cases. OF cours
the grand jury may augment the latte
list somewhat, but probably to no grea
extent.
AS has been- the case for the pas
ten years. the cause OF James w. welcl
VS.. the o. r, ana N. Co., is the frs
to appear on the docket, and it will
probably be tine same at the next and
the next for en- indefinite term. Fol.
lowing are the cases:
James w. Welch VS.. the o. r. and
N. Co.
/ J. NJ. Robb vs. John w. Hume.
II w. Pierce VS.. H. A. Smith.
Wyatt & Thompson VS.. Andrew and
Mary Olsen.
Clatsop Mill Co. VS.. the Gray's River
Logging Co.
w. w. wtherry s. Co. VS.. Simon An
tilla and wife.
H. w. Pierce VS.. II. A. Smith.
P. w. Kearney VS.. H. D. Newberry
School District No. 26 VS.. School Dis
trict No. 8.
Laura Terrell VS.. ]. M. Shively.
Joseph Holiday VS.. C. B. Bellinger,
guardian ad Item. ,a,-,
Joseph Holiday VS.. Oregon Real Es-
tate Co.
c. B .Bellinger VS.. Joseph Holiday.
]. w. Graham VS.. Pacific Construction
Co.
Herman Cohen VS.. Victor volney.
Peter Brach ct. al. vs.. John Peterson
et al
]. H. DeForce VS.. the A. and p. r.
R. Co.
Berliner Strauss et al VS.. Gerfnlle
& Goldman.
Il. r. Hawas VS.. w. H. Parker.
Hong Chong Co. VS.. Agnes Reid and
VIM. Reid.
Emil Ulriok VS.. Frederick Ulrick.
Marcus Wise VS.. H. A. Smith.
Geo. Kaboth VS.. John Service ct. al.
e. f. Libke VS.. Mitchell Bros.
r. l.. Bush VS.. James Welsh.
Dunbar P. and G. Co. VS.. C. f.
Gramms
Ross, Higgins, & Co. VS.. Samuel
Arndt
Astoria Guaranty Subsidy Co. VS..
City of Astoria ct. al.
Simmonds Saw Co. Vs. the Columbia
River L. and M. Co.
r. L. Sabin VS.. Hakvist Towenen.
W. p Dillon VS.. Sam Graham, ct al
Louis Sloss and L. L Baker VS.. A.
w. and Mary Barry.
w. L. Gillett VS.. w. II. Corbin.
The McCague Savings Bank VS.. d.
W. Bush and E. G. Rogers.
The McCague Savings Bank VS.. J.
r. Ross.
The McCague Savings Bank VS.. H. C. !
Thompson.
The McCague Savings Bank VS.. b. |
ind H. G. VanDusen.
VIM. Lehing vs. Emma Crocker ct. al.
D. K. Warren ct. al VS.. J. II. De-
force ct. al.
The oregon l. and s. Co. VS.. Reed &
Wilson.
S. A. d. Peter VS.. Campbell Bros.
Samuel Gilmore VS.. B. Borgenson.
Chas. e. Anderson vs.. Moody & Hus.
ey.
Esberg, Bachman & Co. VS.. Carl os.
maa.
Edward Ehrman VS.. the A. and p. r.
l. Co.
The Park and Lacy Machine Co. VS..
he A. and S. C. r. r. Co.
Freeman Cobb VS.. Fri Beebe.
School District No. !. VS.. Nancy
Velch.
David Tweedle VS.. M. NJ. Ketchum.
Jcnn Erickson VS.. j. ]. Moody.
T. 9. Cornelius VS.. e. A. seeley and
t. W, Everest.
E. L. Blodgett VS.. S. M. and Mar.
aret Johnson.
The Rosenfeld Smith Co. We. Carl
nj Mary Osdmaa.
N. p. Jehery vs.. NJ. N. Flynn.
The Astoria B. and L. Assn VS.. Fred
ro-son ct. al
Martin Ryan vs.. Christian Henry ct.
Edward Ehrman vs.. the A. and p
! p. Co.
s. Elmore vs.. D. M Stuart ct. al.
tesIenme1t Of Book Woo & Co.
The Powers Rubser Co. vs. the city
: astoria.
= 4. Powell - the A. and p. r. r
The Astoria Savings Bank VS.. W. n.
NTH et al
George Kirby rs. W. p. Gibbons.
Astoria National Bank vs.. Mary H.
eiaeawsees,