The Evening dispatch. [volume] (Provo, City, Utah) 1891-1895, 1895-02-20
ALIAS

THE DISTRICT COURT OF
~ the First judicial District of the territory
of Utah, Utah county.
The Anglo American Loan, Mortgage &Agency
Co., Limited, OF London, corporation, plain
tiff, VS.. Thomas h. Earl and Harriet r EarI
his wife. The Lombard Investment company,
a corporation, and Milton B. Whitney Charles
). Fairchild, Harry Mooney, Sanford B.
Laid and Frank Hagerman, receivers of The
Lombard Investment company, defendants.
The People of the territory of Utah send
greeting to Thomas f. Earl and Harriet E.
Earl, his wife, The Lombard Investment COM
pany, corporation, and Milton Il, whitney
Charles S. Fairchild, Harry E. Mooney Sam
ford b. Laid and Frank Hagerman, receivers
Of The Lombard Investment company, de-
PENDANTS.
ton brought against you by the aboye named
plaintiff, in the district court of the First Ju-
diciat district of the territory of Utah, and to
answer the complaint filed tnerein within ten
days exclusive of the day of service) after the
service on you of this summons-if served
within this county; or if served out of this
days; otherwise within forty DAYS or
Judgment by default will be taken against
you, according to prayer of this complaint
The said action is brought to obtain a decree
of this court against the defendants herein for
the sum of Sl,702.70, with interest at ~ per
cent. Der annum, from the 1st day of january.
A. ID, 1895, until paid, and for Sl50.0O attorney
fees. and for COSTS of SUIT Plaintiff eiIeuas
that on the 4th daY of March, 1890. Thomas r
and Harriet e, Earl, his wife. executed and
delivered 10 The Lombard Investment com
pany a certain bond in the sum of 81 GOO 20
with per cent interest per annum, with IL
per cent. after maturity That two of said
coupons have not been paid and that the same
with the principal has been declared due and
payable. That on March 2lst. 1890 the said
Lombard Co sold and assigned the said note
to plRi..tif, who is now the lega holder there
of, and did then and there guarantee the nav
ment OF the within note and principal within
two years from said last mentioJ ed date That
the usual decree may be made for the sale OF
the said premises TO pay said debt, interest,
COSTS ana attorney fees, that the proceeds of
SAFE may be applied in payment of the amount
due plaintiff and that said defendants and
each OF them and all persons claiming under
them or either of them subsequent to the exc
cuuon OF SAID mortgage upon said premises,
either as purchasers, encumhrancers or other
wise, may be barred and foreclosed of all
right, claim, or equity of redemption in said
premises and every part thereof, and that the
said plaintiff may have Judgment and execu-
ton against the said defendants Thomas f.
Earl and Harriet E. Earl and The Lombard
Investment company, for any deficiency
which may remain after applying the pro-
ceeds of sale.
For fuller particulars see CODY of complaint
on file
Aud you are hereby notified that if you fail
to appear and answer the said complaint as
above required, the said plaintiff will apply
to the court for the relief therein demanded,
and costs of suit
witness the Hon. William III King, Judge.
and the seal of the District court of
the First Judicial district in and for
lsEALl the territory of Utah; this 18th day
of February, in the year of ourLord
one thousand eight hundred and
ninety-five,
j. W. BEAsLBY Clerk.
By GEO, HAvERCAMP, Deputy Clerk,
James A. williams, attorney for plaintiff.