The Evening dispatch. [volume] (Provo, City, Utah) 1891-1895, 1895-03-05
ALIAS

- SUMMONS-1N THE DISTRICT COURT OF
y the First judicial District of the territory
or Utah, Utah coun.y.
The Anglo American Loan, Mortgage &Agency
Co.. Limited, of London, a corporation, plain
tiff, vs.. Thomas K. Earl and Hacriett E. Earl.
his wife, Tine Lombard Investment company
q corporation, and Milton b. Whitney, Charles
). Falrchild, Harry E Mooney, Sanford B.
Ladu and Frank Hagerman, receivers OF The
Lombard Investment COM pany, defendants
The People OF the territory of Utah send
greeting to Thomas +. Earl and Harrietu E.
Earl his wife, The Lombard Investment COM
pany, a corporation. and Milton b, whitney.
Charles S. Fairchild, Harry E. Mooney, San
ford b. Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers
of The Lombard Investment company, de-
PENDANTS.
You are hereby required to appear in an ac-
ton brought against you by the aboYe named
plaintiff, IN the district court OF the First Ju-
dicial district OF the territory of Utah, and to
answer the complaint died therein, within ten
days exclusive of the day of Service) alter the
service on you of this summons-if served
within this county; or il served out o. this
county, but in this district, within twenty
days; otherwise within forty days - or
judgment bv default will be taken against
you, according to prayer of this complaint,
The said action is brought to obtain a decree
of this court against the defendants herein for
the sum of Sl,7U2.10, with interest at IL per
cent. per annum, from the 1st day of January,
A. D, 1895, until paid, and for Sl5O.O0 attorney
fees and for costs of sIlt. Plaintiff alleges
that on the 4th day of March, 1850. Thomas T.
and HarrietC E, Earl, his WIFE, executed and
delivered 10 The Lombard Investment COM
pany a certain bond III the sum of 81 10000,
with per cent interest per annum, with II
per cent. after maturity. That two of said
coupons have not been paid and that the same
with the principal has been declared due and
payable. That on March 2Ist 1890. the said
Lombard Co. sold and assigned the said note
to plai. tiff, who is now the ega holuer there
of, and did then and there guarantee the pay
menl OF the luhln no and principal within
two years from said last mention ed date. That
the usual decree may be made for the sale of
the said premises to pay said debt, interest
costs ana attorney fees, that the proceeds of
SAFE may be applied in payment of the amount
due plainutf, and that said de.endants and
each OF them and all persons claiming under
them or either of them subsequent to the exc
cut1on OF SAID mortgage upon said premises,
either as purcnasers, encumorancers or other
wise, may be barred and foreclOsed of all
right, claim, or equity of redemption in said
premises and every par thereof, and that the
said plaintiff may have Judgment and execu-
tlon aS ainst the said defendants Thomas T.
Earl and Harriet Il. Earl and The Lombard
Investment company, for any deficiency
which may remain after applying the pro-
ceeds of sale.
For fuller particulars see copy of complaint
on file.
Aud you are hereby notified that if you fail
to appear and answer the laid complaint as
above required, the said plaintiff will apply
to the court for the relleI therein demanded,
and costs of suit
Witness the Hon. William H King, judge,
and the seal of the District court of
the First judicial district in and for
IsEALl the territory OF Utah; this l5th cay
Of February, in the year o. ourLofd
one II Ouslnd eight hundred end
ninety-1ve,
J. W. BEAsLE Clerk.
By GEO. HAvERoAAP, Deputy Clerk,
James A, Williams, attorney for plaintiff,