The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1895-12-11

Mr., nayaraa may be vindicated in the
The repnblcans were amused Mt this
prediction OF Mr.. Cooper rsgaraine the
peoples vindIcaton Of Mr. Baynrd ana
BROKE INTO 9 cheer when MIR. narrvtt
that four years after MIR Van Iiurne's
vindication. In. 1S,o. "hc was hurled so
deep that he was never heard of again.
In rather an ironical tone. The purpose
OF the resolution, he said was evidently
something OH which TO mir their views
on protection. lie did not think. he said.
THAT a gentleman elected to a seat on
resolution contained grounds for impcacn-
ment.
words. said the ex-spcikcr. "you must
people"
Crisp proceeded to recall The ovcrwhclm-
hlg republican defeat that followed the
enactment OF the mckinley protective
measures. He added that now II the re-
pnbliraus believed 10 heartily In high
profession, they. should be brave enough
10 form aud nass n hill. u was the only
why they could Justify their position.
Mr.. Mccell followed AIR Crisp. and said
Mr.. RaNard made u violent partisan speech
mich r War oG Sa s Hns Of propS
this country ny saying they needed
ss, ,ng master The peeple Of the United
esolulion 20 as TO include in il tho ex-
tract from Mr., Bayards Boston ujnglan,D
speech INCORPORATED In the McC'aii rcso-
luton.
Mr.. ,plngley ucp. Mich) followed Mr.
Mccall ana tool, the ground that Mr.
iioyud was an ambassador uf the United
States, aud the question was whether he
should 80 far forget his duties rs TO de-
nounce the policy Of ouc-hulf OF the peo-
Mr.. pngley-lias the ambassador OF this
county county, . right TO sst on a platform II, II
3aynrd
MIR. crlsp-Any citizen. no matter who
he II ny h. or what position he occupies.
has the right to say what Il" thinlss upon
economic questions.
In reply TO % question by Mr.. Crisp
Mr. llhEleN declared that the onensc OF
Mt Rayatd was lmpeAvhabir and ought
10 De 'npchciahlr hS the hunse, whether
II was policy of the house To impeHcn
waN nuolhct question.
II am very slnd 70 get the gentleman's
opinion" said Mr. Srsr, -
81 hclicYo.' concluded Mr. ninRlcN. that
au example should hc made OF some of
those gentlemen who are constantly Viu-
hitting the principles aud nropiiety az ON
cinl l,tc AIR. hayuid should be publicly
condemned"
Mir Wheeler dem, Alal asked why
the republicans. 81 they were 50 solicit
tlous for the conduct Of our representa-
uVos uhroud, had not recalled Robert G.
Shank, the United states mtator to
Grnal Britain, who had been guilty o."
cheating tho English with worthless min
The republicans smiled. but no one
deuned Ia make n reply.
Nv Cumm,jigs upem n. W, who rot
th- floor ut this point, Injected some
lninor into the debate, lie said he 1l
not know whether the pending resolution
had been brought Into The house under
false prctcnsas, but he ia know that
tho resolution was based upon "A news
paper ropplt Of q speech. that II WAS
brought in by n newspaper EDITOR tMr
BarrctD and bncked by another editor
I.l.. l.At Il
pnrrr man mud he congratulated the news
paper men OF the country TINT at lust
they spoke on the floor of the house
Mir Canuon Rep,. Il). Thought that the
resolution should no 10 the Judiciary aud
| might be doubtful M to the improWfIeiy
| Of lmpcachiug Mr., nnyard. but lie did
| believe the Edinburgh speech should pc
house OF representatives TO express its
| disapprovaf 10y adopting resolution OF
censOre.
Mr Turner of Georgia took the posi-
tlon that Mr. lilyard'S utt"ranoeh, If cor
roctly reported. did not oven constitute
an impropri"tN
resolution. denounced In unmeasurod tones
the course Of Mr.. BaSard. WIZ. lie sad.
not only dispnTaR al n clVil policy nl IN"
United stat6a, hut impugned the honesty
nnd integrity of those who alvor uea mat
policy,
Mct'rra7V upcm, XVI. tirOwst ttep., IA D.
Money dom. M-s). and McGunu QIcm.,
CALI MIR. lnrrett. ON tho, Nggesiion OF
Mir mt, r"qurnt"d unanimous consent
mat hiN resolution be 80 noiliru thht
that portion OF the resolution making II
mandatory uron no COMMITTEE 70 l,p1rt
'Niv Impeachment or otherwise should be
Therc was some parliamentary spnr-
ring over tho point as to whether NC
siriking OUT Of those words would not
divost the resolution of i'R prlNieBed ~
tire which III" speaker decided ~ ine
negative, whorcupon Mr.. crisp ohl"ciei'
saving that hu wanted the other side 70
En ON record ns voting for i,np"arhlnen',
Mr.. bnrrett then closed me debate ~ ,},a
subject waR one nrar TO tile hnhrt4 ~
American people and should he discussed.
When tile previous question was dr-
monded. Mr.. Crisp moved 10 refer the
question 10 the Judiciary committee, This
was Lost on a rising yote--So TO lOS'
vote. which wns taken, resulting ~ TO a0'
Mr. Cannon moved 10 strike ON "a.
words. by impeachment or oth'f"'~''
and his motion was agreed 10.
As amended the resolution was adopted
without a division,
Immediate consideration q resolution to
instruct Tie committee on naval affairs
when appeinted 10 lnyeStgaie ne r.pofis
that the hnttleEhip T"Nua was faulty In
construction aud also 10 report upon th"
plane Of construction, cost ana seaworihi-
ness Of the ship
The foiiowlfig committee on accounts
was announced. Aidmch uiep, ~ chnir-
Tenn1, Iracey Dep Miss.), Long nscp.,
KanD. Busk Ucm., MOI, Price d)"i
';Thon nj 1865 p. m. the house, on mo-
ton Of Mr.. Dingloy, adjourned until
Thursday.
THE BARRETT RESOLUTION.
Washington. December I0.-Mr Barretts
resolution rs as follows;
.k frhnu1u- Il Pawn ri United