Southwest-sentinel. [volume] (Silver City, N.M.) 1883-189?, 1895-11-19


from Sierra co.
Ell Foster. Rocr First National Bank
OF Defining ys a. II Booz, ct al; assump-
eit by attachment.
Valvordo Laid & Cattle Co We Jose
Ma Lopez; e%ieotment. Venue changed
from Socorro co.
A b Laird va II Jones, ct al; assump-
cit by attachment.
Burna Walker & Co Va James N
Upton; lebt.
Smith a jackson va William Walker;
assumpsit by attachment
J Kelly We A b Laird; Replevin.
Elizabeth q Upton W A b Laird, sher-
i6; replevtn.
ii Htzsimmons vs. Colossal Mining co;
nssumpsit by attachment.
q Wormser 4 Co vs. Q M Lewis &
Some; a~ssumpst
III Paso Smelling Works Va Gillett 4
Son; assumpsit.
A B Cowen, ct alvs J p Casey. ct ux,
a~ppehantsi appeal. Change Of venue
from Dona Ana co.
@ wormser 4 Co vs s Lindaueri as
sumpsit.
Edwin L Foster Receiver We Siemund
Lindauer, Gustav Wormser and g
WormHer, adm; assumpsit.
Ada r Menge VS. Deming Land &
Water co; assumpsit.
James M Lynch We William Skillicorn
ct al; assumpsit and attachment.
~ kiverall We Mrs A - Parker, appel
ant; appeal.
r l. Foster, receiver vs. Andrew B.
Laird; assumpsit.
Thomass Parker vs. The Azure Mining
CO; eiectment.
Edwin L Foster Receiver VS. vermiiC
Company; assumpsit
Evaristo Cook vs. Henry Miller, ct ux.
replevln.
Territory ex rel benefit Grant Co v.
Willibald Berg, ct oil; debt an bond.
Westheimer- Swartz Shoe Co vs. Gay.
ton n Petty; assumpsit.
John Corbstt vs. Clayton n Petty as
sumpsit.
st George Robinson VS. William Laiz
ure & Richard W Grade; assumpsit.
Patrick McGeeney We Max Heyman 4
Morris Juda; attachment.
Richard Hudson VS. j + Allison, OF al
eiectment.
Martin Maher We A FR Il co
appellant; appeal.
Rufus L. Helm We John Brockman
covenant.
Edwin L Foster receiver vs. John 4
Ralthel; assumpsit by attachment.
Themas + Pegg We Lydia j Caldwell
assumpsit and attachment.
Edwin i Foster receiver VS. John
Hussey, OF al assumpsit.
Edwin +, Foster receiver VS. John '
Fleming; assumpsit.
Myles Harkln We s p Carpenter az
pellant; appeal.
Upton u Mcdaniel VS. Andrew B LAIR
aseumpsit. Set for Let Wednesday.
r L Foster receiver VS. Con M Nolar
assumpsit.
Edwin L Foster receiver vs. A H Mac
donald; assumpsit.
L Mcdonald W Cruz Casada, appellant, apDei
&c Hartford vs. Thomas Phillips; appeal.
TerritOry vs. j A BrOekman, ct al; sci IA.
George Theis, JrYs @ + Howell; assumuSit
Frank Phelps vs. Deming Land & Water @
Ciarits Norero VS. Celso Gonzales, ct ux; a
suWpsit and attrchmdnt.
Nathaniel Bell vs. Van Smelling Co; assumps
Houek aud DETER VS. Oscar Bolch; assumpsl
Albert Schultz vs. Clas Poe aud John Deeme
ABLaiid VS. Louiz serna; assumpslt.
Tomas Maese vs. Matide Bega; assumpsit
& u Foster, receiver vs. J A Miller and Mrs
- W ANNANML0NNH
l. ATkSF Cows A II Mnnson; replevln.
+ J Davidson vs. h w Dayis; assuinpsit BY q
ltachmtnt-
f. davidson VS. Consolidated Nebraska Mi
ing Co assuinpSit by attachment.
fhOnlas x Rice vs. joint Givens; aSsunpSl
CC1ate vs. j b Jernigan %assunpslt.
keays and HerlidOn vs. Manuel IaylOri q
sumpslt.
D., ~ Sheridan vs. G n Petty, ct al; assumpsit,
Stewart l. Tatum vs. Western Union Tel u
Trespass on the Ease.
3 Territory VS. n NJ keal Estate s. Building A
T6rriIory VS. q wormser q Co; debt.
a Territory vs. The Cooks Peak Mining Co; del
Territory W MimDres Consolidated Mini
Co; Debt.
q Territory VS. John q Berry; debt.
q Territory VS. EstAte Of Idus l.. Fielder; debt
Territory VS. Waltsr h Duly; debt.
Territory VS. Carl w Schlnidle; debt.
Of Territory vs. 5 g Bishop Go; debt.
Territory VS. TN Hawkins; debt.
Territory vs. Rice & Doyle; debt.
n Territory vs. James N Upton; debt.
Beyes kascon vs. Thomas j Clark; trespasS
the case.
Territory VS. standard Mining Co; debt.
y Territory We Julia Black; debt.
Territory vs. Theodore Hobart ana d.. Z J
st Territory VS. J B Foster and the Meehani
Saving Bank Of Westerly, r. ! debt.
Territory vs. JOhn B Foster; debt.
Ia Territory w Rufus I Helm; Debt.
Territory vs. Yalverde Mining B Smelling {
+. debt.
Territory VS. Colossal Mining Coz debt.
p (Contlhhed next week.