The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1895-09-24
SUMMONS.

for the Third Judicial district of Utah
territory, county OF Salt Lake. James p.
Freeze. plaintiff. Us. John Reading, Annie
and A. B. Jones, J. c. Vaughn, F. l..
Hutchinson, Henry NJ. Sanborn and Utah
National Bank. corporation, defendants
Summons. The people of the territory
CT Utah send greeting. to John Reading.
Annie Reading, Amos W. Butler, ]. NJ.
Stout. and A. B. Jones, J. G. G. Vaughn;
Utah National Bank. q corporation de
PENDANTS You are hereby required to
appear in an action brought against you
trict court of the Third judicial district,
of the territory of Utah, and to answer
the complaint filed therein within ten
after the service on you of this. sum
ntons-if served within this county; or.
if served out of this county, but in this
district, within twenty days; otherwise
fault will be taken against you, according
to the prayer of said complaint. The said
against c defendant John Reading on four
causes of action, as follows, to-wit: 1st
for 81 900 with interest from February
14th 1895 at 10 per per cent. Per an m for
a certain promlssory note executed by
said defendant to defendant a. w. But
Ter, Nov. 18th, 1921. for $1,000 with interest
from date at 10 per cent. per annum,
same being due and wholly unpaid save
interest to Feb 18th, 1895, and being Sc
cured by a mortgase OF even date on
cuted by said defendant Reading to said
Butler; End, in sum of $1,000 with interest
= 10 per cent. per annum from Feb. 1st.
1895 and 500 attorneys fee against de-
PENDANTS Reading; alleged 10 be due on
2 certain promissory note executed by
said defendant John Rse9ading 70 said But
Ter Feb l. 1892, for GOO with interest
from date at 10 per cent. per annun, same
being due and wholly unpaid save inter
est to Feb. /, 1885, and being secured by
mortgage of even date on premises sec
ondly hereinafter described, executed by
defendants Reading 10 said Butler 3rd
for So COO with interest at u per cent. per
news fees, alleged to be due % cer-
tain promissory note executed by defend
ants Reading to plaintiff. Feb. 10th, 1892,
for 5000 with interest from date at 12
ner cent per annum, Same being due
and wholly unpaid save interest to Feb
10Th 1854, and being secured by a mort
Hereinafter described. executed by de-
PENDANTS Reading to j. M. Stout and A.
r. Jones; 4th, in the. sum OF Sl.40C with
interest in the sum of y Der cent. per an
num from April 9th, 1892. for 500 attor-
news fees and costs Of suit, alleged TO be
due on a certain promissory note exc
tiff April 9th, 1891, for 81, 400 with inter-
est from date at u per cent. per annum
same being due and wholly unpaid save
interest to April 9th, 1892, and being Sc
cured by a mortgage of even date on
PREMISES hereinafter fourthly described.
executed by defendants Reading to plain
tiff. the notes and mortgages in first
two causes of action herein mentioned
having been duly assigned to plaintiff,
who IS now the owner and holder there
of; to have a decree of foreclosure for
ing that proceeds of said sale be applied
in payment of amounts found due plain
tiff as above; that defendants and all
persons claiming under them be barred
and foreclosed of all claim or equity
of redemption in said premises; that
plaintiff have a deficiency judgment