The record-union., 1895-11-09
SUPREME COURT.
1t VIII Meet In This City on Monday
Next,

Court will commence in this city on
Monday next, which will be motion
day. Following is the calendar:
November I2th.
I'm bankO
Grim. 37-The People, etc. VS.. Howard.
! Grim. SS-Ihe People, etc. vs.. Werner.
| Grim. 93-rhe People, ETC., vs. Ranlett.
| Is, 333-Cooper VS.. Miller ct al.
! Is 403-Ludy VS. County OF COlusa
! 1S,40S-The Altoona quicksilver NJ. Co. VS..
| Integral Quicksilver NJ. Co.
November 18Th.
| Department One.)
Grim. 32-The People, ETC.. VS.. Wong Chung
Suey.
Grim. 1.-THE People. etc, vs.. James ct al.
Sac. 31-MeYers vs.. Nelson ct al.
Sac. 49-Conlan vs.. Sullivan ct al
sac. 12-ROZecrans Mining Co. W. Morey.
Is ,306-Sehorn Us. Williams, Auditor.
sac. lT-In the matter OF the bonds of Cen
trail Irrigation District.
sac. 26-Epplnger & Co. VS.. Kendrick.
Department Two.)
18,420-The 76 Land and, Water Co. vs..
Abbott.
1S434-Smilie Us. Fresno County.
Sac. 2-Ah song VS. The Earl Fruit Co.
sac. 7-Reid VS.. Reid.
Sac. 39-siIver Creek and Pac. L. and w.
Co. VS.. Hayes Ell al.
sac. 42-McKenzie VS.. Scottish Union and
Nat. ms. Co.
Grim. SG-The People, etc., VS.. Smith
4 3.
Grim 66-The People etc, VS.. Sternberg.
November I4th.
Department One)
Sac. 3S-Barntield VS.. South Side Irrig. Co.
Sac. 13-keener VS.. The Eagle Lake and
IrTlg. Co.
Sac. 14-Riggo VS.. The Eagle Lake and
Irrig. Co.
sac 33-Purser VS.. Hutchinson ct al.
sac 36-SpOOner VS.. Cady.
sac 65-CaI. Savings ana Loan Society VS..
Harris.
sac. 73-Merced County vs. Fleming.
Is, 301-Prouty vs. DeIvin ct al.
Department Two)
Sac. 43-Murry VS.. hurry ct al.
Sac. 72-Warner VS.. Southern Pacific Co. g
sac. o2-liolly vs.. Heiskell.
sac. S6-McBean VS.. City OF Fresno.
sac. 23-LittIe vs. Caldwell.
Sac 55-TrevaskIs VS.. Peard ct al.
sac. 64-CIine VS.. Robbins.
Sac. S0-DeilapiazZa VS.. Foley Ell a..
November 18Th.
Department OneJ
18,406-Tho Mountain Tunnel Gravel NJ.
Co. vs. Hamln OF al.
Sac. 56-Sutton VS.. Nicolaisen.
sac 5S-hennedy vs.. Conroy.
Sac. 6O-Estate OF Byrne deceased.
Sac. 69-Erte Us. Placer County ct al.
sac. S0-Phiiiips ct al. W. Hogart.
sac. 24-Blood VS.. McCarty.
Sac. Slope vs.. Armsby Company.
Department 81
sac. 3O-Donohue VS.. The Trinity Con.
Cold and silver M. Co. ct al.
1S,435-AckIey VS.. BIackhawk Gravel
Mining Co.
Sac. 50-Underwood VS.. stoddard, Col
lectOr, etc.
Sac 59-Page VS.. Atkins.
sac: 68-Jacob ct al. VS. Day ct al.
is, 392-keudall vs.. Earl ct al.
sac. Estate vs.. Frat.
Sac. 29-Hughes ct al, VS., Alsip.
November I9th.
Department One.)
Sac 9-Fassett VS. Wise ct al.
Sac. 1S-ShOobert ct al. VS.. DeMotta.
sac 6-Lottus ct al. VS.. Fischer ct al
Sac 41-People's Ditch Co. VS.. 76 Land and
Water 90.
sac. 62-The Visala and Tulare r. r. Co.
We Hyde.
sac 54-Bahwell vs. Smith ct al.
Sac 66-Tuiare Irrig. Dist VS.. Kaweah
Canal and Irrig. Co.
Sac. 7O-EIliS VS.. Tulare Co.
department TwoD
sac 32-Estate of Williams, deceased, VS..
Clark ct al
sac. 35-Byxbee VS.. Dewey.
sac 37-Gilman VS. McClatchy ct al.
Sac. o7-kendall VS.. Porter, Treasurer.
Sac Characterization Dist. No. 535 etc.,
vs. hamilton.
sac 67-Gainsley vs.. Gainsley.
Sac. 76-Dam VS.. link ct al.
Sac. 1-Eich VS.. Greeley ct al.
November Goth.
Department One1
Sac 74-Guittery VS.. Wisdom
Sac. 75-Tulare Building and Loan Assooi-
alton VS.. Coleman ct al
Sac. S3-FoX, guardian, vs. Cousins.
is 34O-Goodnow VS.. Parker ct al.
Sac. 5-Swamp Land DIST No. 307 vs..
Glide.
Department Two)
Sac. 47.-Porter. executor, ETC.. vs. Muller,
administrator, etc.
Sac. 4S-Estate of Mckinney, deceased.
sac. 71-SWlnnerton ct al. VS.. The Argo-
naut l.. and ID. Co.
sac. 20-GregOry ct al. vs.. Diggs ct al.
Sac. 44-Eberhardt VS.. Coyne.