The Evening dispatch. [volume] (Provo, City, Utah) 1891-1895, 1895-03-13
ALIAS

ALIAS
- SUMMONS-lN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
- the First judicial District of the territory
OF Utaf. Utah eoun y.
The Anglo American Loan, Mortgage &Agency-
Co., Limited, OF London, corporation, plain
tiff vs. Thomas +. Earl and HARRIET f. EarI
his wife, The Lombard Investment company,
a corporation, and Milton B. whitney Charles
5. Fairchild, Harry Moouev, Sanford g..
Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers of The
Lombard Investment company, defendants.
The People of the territory OF Utah send
greeting to Thomas f. Earl and HarrietJ F.
Earl, his wife, The Lombard Investment COM
pany, corporation, and Milton Il, whitney,
Charles s. Fairchild, Harry E. Mooney, San
ford B. Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers
of The Lombard Investment company, de-
PENDANTS.
tton brought against you by the aboYe named
plaintiff, III the district court of the First Ju-
dlciat district of the territory of Utah. and to
answer the complaint filed therein, within ten
days exclusive OF the day of service) after the
service on you of this summons-if served
within this county; or if served out of this
clunty, but in tins district, within twenty
days; Otherwise within forty days or
judgment by defsuit will be taken against
you. according to prayer of this complaint.
The said actioni is brought to obtain a decree
of this court against the defendants herein for
the sum of 81, 1870 with interest at IL per
cent. per annum, from the lst day of january
n. ID, 1890, until paid, and for Sl50.O0 attorney
fees and for costs OF suit. Plaintiff alleges
IL i Il.
and Harriet E, Earl, his wife. executed and
delivered 10 The Lombard Investment COM
pany d certain bond in the sum of 81 600 co.
with per cent. interest per annum, with II
per cent. after maturity That two of said
coupons have not been paid and that the same
with the principal mas been declared due and
Dayable. That on March 2lst, 1890 the said
Lombard Co sold and assigned the said note
to plai..tif, who is now the lega holder there
of, and did then and there guarantee the pay
ment OF the within note and principal within
two years from said last mentioG ed date. That
the usual decree may be made for the sale OF
the said premises to pay said deOt, interest,
COSTS and attorney fees that the proceeds of
SAFE may be applied in pay ment of the amount
due plain1ff. and that said defendants and
each OF them and all persons claiming under
them or either of them subsequent to the exc
cutlon OF SAID mortgage upon SAID premises,
either as purchasers, encum Orancers or other
wise, may be barred and foreclOsed of all
right, claim or equity of redemption in said
premises and every par thereof, and that the
said plaintiff may have judgment and execu-
tiOn against the said defendants Thomas f.
Earl and HARRIET e. Earl and The Lombard
Investment company, for any deficiency
which may remain after applying the pro-
ceeds OF sale.
For fuIer particulars see copy of complaint
on file
And you are hereby notified that if you fail
to appear aud answer the said complaint as
above required, the said plaintiff will apply
to the court for the relief therein demanded,
and COSTS of suit
Witness the Hon. William II King, Judge,
and the seal of tine District court of
the First judicial district in and for
leEALl the territory of Utah; this 18th day
OF February, in the year of OurLOrd
one thousand eight hundred and
j. W, BEAsLEY. Clerk.
By GEO. HAvERCAMP, Deputy Clerk.
James a. Williams, attorney for plaintiff.