The Madison daily leader. [volume] (Madison, S.D.) 1890-current, 1895-02-20
WAS NOT HAYWARD.
George GrindaIl Testifles a. TO
the Man Who Rode With
Miss Cling.
WoRDY WAR or ATTORNEYS
Attorneys Nye and Erwin Prom
ise to Show Each Others
Methods Up.

MINNEAPOLIS, Feb. 20.-Edward Good
cell, the Chicago dental student, was
mt On the stand when the Hayward
murder trial opened for his re. direct ex-
animation. He testified that he had
usually been Harry Haywdcd's compan-
ion when he came to Chicago. to gamble,
and that he had seen him lose as much
as OIL. 600 at q time. He usually had
plenty of money, and for this a
C4oodsell was not surprised to see him
with 5000 when there in November:
Asked on cross-examination IL ne haa
ever g Harry lose at 70 Jackson street.
Chicago, he said it was at q Wabash
avenue resort that he lost.
Mark of q Lady's Shoe.
Frank Erhardt, who was summoned
by his brother when the body was found
rave evidence which seemed to impeacn
the evidence of Blixt in n important
narticular. He swore that he had found
in the dirt near where the body lay, q
heel mark and then q toe mark OF o
1adv's shoe. There was also the trace
of where the foot had dragged to where
the bodv Law. This evidence went to
show that Miss Ging's body was pushed
out of the buggy feet first instead Z
head first as the murderer TESTIFIED. VI
course this would overthrow the theory
that the fracture of the skull and the
confusion were caused by the fall from
the buggy and would help to inpeach
the evidence of Blixt.
u~u~s4or nsau,k FRA HAYWARD.
| George Grindall was an important
witness for the defense. He was stand
. ing ON First avenue north, between
. Fourth and Fifth streets at z o'clock, Oh
: whereabouts. on Dec. 8, the night OF the
= murder. Grindal had an appointment
0 with a young woman OF n POM
named, and was waiting there for her
Q Standing o short way from him was
man, 'like that man there said en-
3 witness pointing to Attorney Sweetser
Grindall saw Miss Cling drive up. Th'
man he had seen waiting there entered
s the buggy with her and they drov'
away. This point is about q blocl
y from the West hotel, whence Mis-
Cling started ON her fateful aide. In
description given by Grindall OF tn
man who Joined her does not at all II
q Harry Hayward.
ol A wOrdy Quarrel.
70 There was O wordy quarrel betwee
the LAWYERS over Grindall's testimony
II The state had shown in cross examine
II ton that that the witness characte
es was not above reproach, and then in til
redirect examination MIR. Erwin q
tempted TO show that the witness hs
j. been bounded and prosecuted by I'll
In police to get him to change his test
X mony. These questions were steadil
rs ruled ont by the court as improper, an
Ia finally the court found it necessary
as reprove Mir. Erwin for his persistent q
IN tempts to get the matter before the jur.
in IF the court pleases, said Erwin in
high key, "I want to show the metho'
that have been used by persons ON I'll
other side of manufacturing and su
pressing evidence"
Turning to County Attorney Nye,
y said:
.sTm going to hunt You out and
VI through this thing"
"Nye half rose in his chair, his Ia
y as white as ashes and glared at the Il
Do attorney for the defense.
"I'n follow you," he Kissed, Ito &
ne ends of the earth. Don't talk to me
manufacturing evidence. I'll show w
has been manufacturing the evidence
use this case"
ar. al hope you WILL" shouted Erwi
m and Judge Smith was forced to int
Of rupt the colloquy, the participants
te, which had assumed very threateni
let attitude But the questions were r
Ga. orously excluded. Grindall's eviden
de, was somewhat shaken in the cross
he animation. He was still ON the sta
when the court adjourned for dinner.
The elusive third man" whom |
defense has been SO earnestly chasir
thus hobs up again in Grindall's g
dence, but in a different guise from |
descriptions of him limited at heretoft
in the d~efense's evidence.
WI - --------~ - - 5f-HE#&#"a