Great Falls weekly tribune., 1895-10-25
ARE ON THE CIVIL CALENDAR
Complete List Of Civil Actions on the
Calendar For Trial at the October
Term.
Several Important Suits in Which
Every Taxpayer Is Interested
Ninety Cases.

calendar for trial at the term of the dis
trict court which began at 10 a. m.
Monday. 1t will probably be Novembe,
! before the civil calendar is reached, as
there are several important criminal ac.
tons.
Or the civil cases on the calendar
several are of considerable public inter
est.
No. 1920 and several other cases of
similar nature are actions to eject squat
ters from the river front.
No. 1,407 arises from the fact that
when the plaintiff, the state treasurer,
deposited about S2l 900 of state funds
in the Merchants National bank of
Great Falls, the directors of the bank
executed an indemnity bond to him.
When the bank failed suit was brought
on the bond. The defense is that the
name of one of the bondsmen was
erased, thus invalidating the bond.
No. l4G} is an action on the bond of
&. W. Morehouse, late police magistrate
Nos. 1,J2l and ,525 will test the valid
ity OF the Townsite company's form of
contract for deed.
No. l,53) is an action for damages
caused to plaintiff by an assault by de-
fendant.
| No 1870 is an action for damages to a
buggy, caused by horse becoming
frightened at the paving roller.
No. l,79S is the action on the late City
Treasurer Elliotts bond, to recover city
funds in the suspended Merchants Ma.
tional bank
No. 1,9l5 is to enforce Judgment
against the trustees of the old Gilt Edge
Mining company.
No. 1,91S is on debt incurred by the
| republican county central committee in
| 1892.
No. 2,21O is the Island park suit.
| The parties to the actions above dcs-
| ignated by numbers may be found by
reference to the full calendar, which
follows:
No. 5i2-J. ID. White ct al. vs. A. *.
Barbour; account.
No. 9ll-Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co..
vs. j. f. eastman ct al; account. SAG %.
No. 925 Andrew Lind ct al. VS.. d. f..
Smith ct al: appeal
No. l,O0O-l. q. Baker e. Co. VS.. Fl. r
Vaughn; account, s225.13
No. ,O07 First National bank VS.. j J..
Linn; note, 500.
No. lOl5 --Adaline y. Gates vs. Albert
j. Gates; divorce.
No. LAO Merchants National bank
of Great Falls VS.. Lena Reilly ct AL F.;
| foreclosure.
No l,l9O--Nellie Perkins VS.. w. Ulm;
Djunction.
No. l,2o3 Merchants National bank
vs.. q. l.. Stevenson ct al; note.
| No. l,32O-Great Nor thern Railway
company Vs. +. N. Warner ct al: eject
ment.
Nos 1,:322 l,32G-Great Northern Rail
way company vs. Peter Funk, John
Stiles, John Albert, Philip Chambers ct
al, Lee Forrest ct al; ejectment.
Nos. 1880, 1,334, l,33G, 1912 Great
Northern Railway company VS. John w.
bert ct al, Ernest Schubert ct al; eject
mcnt.
No. 1876 First National bank VS.. G..
10 ~ ~ 'Iy,r, Crn,t t'ND Nnrthor, p.;1,v
~, ,,, ,,,I;,' Ini :,t. ii'""
NJ Gnant oil'' ,Soi''Ii .!ura''.
,,yo w, Loo Tn,r"d. "iI'
NJ o7I ~. E;ret Nntin nIor,non. 1s II
y o' p'Irn' .d,n4 ~ -''''"''''' ''''" '' H.
Nv i'','i inT E"ii w ,r.;,.,. IT :,
p,,,s. . ~ .J' ~ InnG uI w. " ''1'' ''' - L
's'>, n" i9n' "n' 'IG''.,' " - Eoto, ,, l., w d.,
o,,, .,p. s,.2oi % '''''' ''' ! w. Hie
''S Na ,'"I', lex }-'I Ci+, rs polort ,,o,,t -
-, J,'l '""7 ~" ''
"I. ~ ooIu. In2 ,,,ol;, coodo.n,o;n ua
e;ras. '' a.
Nn 53i C,rnat Isnil, .'il 81 r. r.,
->', p,,,Ii, ~, ~ az it'a i" = w.
" VI a-n "o'''i0 W. ''"S'' ''n' ''"''"e''
'i;y,'0' n" 70, z2- lroo4 f7,I,, NJ y Z, r r.,
vs ~ = po1ro ot 81 '.''| nnnirant e. S-0 90
.oM Won u 'Tu' = ~
>oi ',,|m ,'',oa H. T. ho''o vs. ',h'I 'ID-
'''>' n, ,''','.,'si. - 1o,o Kor,o,.ho .rao
"a '''i .,,,,, ,,"S '"" '7s 'V"'
" H. 10 =. "a 49, %, W T,,'J r.1
,,,.,, -1"' 3.}oo ~ w. ''''''p7 Vs. c''y'
''">-,"EIS; Ne 5oi 10 p".to "t e. Aron.o ca..
! AH'' ii'pI--- i'uLtT " h'hthha 'phliltI-