The Evening dispatch. [volume] (Provo, City, Utah) 1891-1895, 1895-02-18
ALIAS

SCMMONS-1N TIE DISTRICT COURT OF
y the First judicial District of the territory
OF Utah, u tah coun y.
The Anglo American Loan, Mortgage &Agency
Co., Limited, OF London, q corporation, plain
tiff vs. Thomas +. Earl and Harriet E. Earl
his Wife, The Lombard Investment company
a corporation, and Milton B. Whitney, Charles
S Fairchild, Harry B Moonev, Sanford B.
Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers OF The
Lombard Investment company. defendants.
The People of the territory OF Utah send
grs eiing to Thomas E Earl and Harriet E.
Earl, his wife, Tne Lombard Investment COM
pany, corporation. and Milton B, whitney,
Charles S Fairchild, Harry E. Mooney, San
ford B Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers
of The Lombard Investment company, de-
ferdants.
You are hereby required to appear in an ac-
ton brought against you by the above named
plaintiff, in the district court OF the First Ju-
dical district of the territory of Utah, and to
answer the complaint filed tnerain, within ten
days Exclusive of the day of service) after the
service on you Of This summons-if served
within this county; or If served out OF this
county, but in this district, within twenty
days; otherwise within forty DAYS - or
judgment by default will be taken against
you, according to prayer of this complaint
The said action is brought to obtain a decree
OF this courJ against the defendants herein for
the SUM of 81, ,7U2.IO, with interest at IL per
cent. per annum, from the lst day of January,
A d. 1895, until paid, and for $4,000 attorney
fees, and for cosls of suit. Plaintiff alleges
III, II
and Harriet e, Earl, his wife. executed and
delivered 10 The Lombard Investment COM
DGny certain bond Ill the sum OF 81, 500 10,
with per cent. interest per annum, with IL
per cent. after maturity. That two of said
coupons have not been paid and that the same
with the principal has been declared due and
payable. That on March 2lst, $780, the said
Lombard Co sold and assigned the said note
to plailtiff who is now the lega holder there
Of and did then and there guarantee the pay
ment of the within note and principal within
two years from said last mention ed date. That
the usual decree may be made for the sale of
the said premises to pay said debt, interest,
COSTS and attorney fees, that the proceeds OF
SAFE may be applied in paV ment OF the amount
due plainnff and that said defendants and
each of them and all persons claiming under
them or either of them subsequent to the exc
cution of said mortgage upon SAID premises,
either as purchasers encumhrancers or other
wise, may be barred and foreclosed of all
right, claim o. equity of redemption in said
premises and every par thereof, and that the
said PLAINTIFF may have judgment and eXecu-
ton against the said defendants Thomas L.
Earl and HARRIET e. Earl and The Lombard
Investment company, for any deficiency
which may remain after applying the pro-
ceeds of sale.
For fuller particulars see copy of complaint
on file
And Won are hereby notified that if you fail
to appear and answer the said complaint as
above required, the said plaintiff will apply
to the court for the relief therein demanded,
and COSTS of suit
Witness the hon. william ID King, Judge,
and the seal of the District court of
the First Judicial district in and for
IsEAL the territory of Utah: this 18th day
OF February, in the year of ourLord
one thousand eight hundred and
ninety-fYe,
J. W. BEAsLBY. Clerk.
By GEO. HAvEROAMP, Deputy Clerk.
James A, Williams, attorney for plaintiff.