The Madisonian. (Virginia City, Mont.) 1873-1915, 1895-05-18
COURT CALENDAR
OF THE JUD-
lCIAL MILL.
Up BEFORE Judge Frank mowers
Litigation.
Litigation.

DlSlllcu court Will CCINclc IICiItSN.
1t is the regula: May term, and the
session promises to 0e a short one. I'M
less the acknowledgement case. in
volving the title 10 the townsite of
Sheridan, ome up for hearing. This
long drawn out legal battle will prob
ably be resumed m some manner in
case the supreme court remittitur is
filed with the district clerk in time.
But if the remittitur comes not the case
will have to 60 over until the next
term.
The civil docket shows the following
cases and their present status in the
order named:
No. 81. Henry Filing vs.. NJ. L.
Emign, ct al. Action to foreclose chat
tie mortgage.
No. Ill. John J.Lown VS.. Henry N.
Blake ct al. Settlement of statement
npon motion for a new trial.
No. 1877. Nahum Parker VS. Samuel
Kaufman. Action for damages.
No. 142. Chas. X. Larabee ct al. VS..
Henry N. Blake ct al. Action to quiet
title. On answer to complaint.
No. l45. O. X. Lewis, ct al. VS..
debt.
No. l49. Geo. N. Thompson, ct al.
vs.. Ike N. Smith. ct al. Action for
specific performance.
No. 100. Henry Filing VS.. Chas.
Zeigler. Action for debt.
No. III. Patt Scott VS.. -Arch'd
McGown. Action upon due bill. De-
murrer to amended complaint.
No. 10. Alexander Mckay VS.. VIM.
McDougall. Action in ejectment and
for Injunction. On demurrer to
amended complaint.
No. 1873. John H. Davis, guardian of
Augustus Sweet, a minor. VS.. H. A.
Amsden, ct al. Eiectment.
No. 1S4. Chas. NJ. Parr VS.. H. a.
Amsden ct al. Ejectment.
No. 1856. Joseph Evans VS.. Fernando
C.. Rite. Forcible entry and detainer.
Set for trial May %.
No. 1S9. Archie Hyndman VS.. Ma
hum Parker. Debt. Set for trial
May -.
No. 1871. Augusta A. Smith VS.. NJ.
l.. Emigh. Case tried and now under
consideration.
No. 1872. Fred Ellinghouse ct al. VS..
Thos. T. Taylor. Action for condem'
nation of right of way for ditch. Or
answer to complaint.
No. 1914. VIM. A. Blair VS.. Geo. II.
Casey ct al. Action for damages and
Injunction. On answer to complaint.
No. 1876. John S. Wall VS.. p. A.
Largely ct al. Action upon water right,
Demurrer to amended complaint.
No. 1917. Caleb Eldred VS.. Mary A
Eldred. Action for divorce.
No. POO. Dillon Implement Co. Us
Joseph Lukanistch. Debt.
No. POS. Con Crowley VS.. Ra.
Rochester, administrator. Motion t
quash and dismiss action.
No. POI. Henry Filing VS.. John M
Conway. Action to foreclose chattlt
mortgage.
No. POS. Chas. S. Shoemaker VS.
William Irwin. Ejectment and dam
ages.
No. 300. Harry Redfeld ct al. VS.
King Mining Co. Action upon &c
count. Demurrer to complaint ant
motion to dissolve attachment,
No. 2lO. VIM. l.. Deimling VS.. VIM
Ennis ct al. cOpartncrs as Prindle
Co. Action upon account.
No. 21l. Henry Filing VS.. TIL
Noble Mining and Milling company
debt.
No. 2l2 Henry Filing VS.. Georg
Stephens ct al. Debt.
No. 2l3. Isdell Mere. Co. VS.. Colder
Star Gold Mining Co. Action on at
count.
No 215. Fernando G. Rice VS.. Je
seph Evans. Action to quiet title.
No. PIG. w. r. Clark VS.. Hattie {
II. ClaIk. Action for divorce.
No. 2lS. Nelson J. Isdell vs.. H. A
Dimock. Action to foreclosc NOR,
gage.
No. 22O. Parrot Silver and Cope
Co. VS.. L. Dearn. Action for right {
way for ditch.
No. POI. G. w. Garfield VS.. tn
r., ,~l Trnrr ~