Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1895-01-21
THE SUPREME COURT.
Further Argument Of Cases Brought
Up Ol Appeal.
no OPINIONS RENDERED YET
Reversal by the U. s. supreme Court.
"A Prisoners Application
Other Business.


January term tlil morning, all tue
Judges being present.
MORE lNoCI,s Al tine DOOR.
Upon ths favorable report VI the
examining committee, prclentcd by
Attorney l.. q. Cutchlow, Mcs1rp.
Geo. NJ. Lawrence, Robert II. Bruton
and II. G.. Edwards wofo admitted to
practice al the bar uf this court
Attorney c. b. Vauan moved the
admission 10 the bar Of Hon. &C.
Hatch, Of HUber city. aud the appllcn,
lien was referred 10 tue examining
committee.
JUDD ON IHE RIGHT SIDE.
a couple OF habeas corpus oasoa had
been previously sot down for hearing
today, nud the attorneys Tor tho
respective defendants, Mussfs. ID. ID.
loulz aud 3. T., Armstrong, called tho
COurpu attention 10 this fact ns coon AS
tho usual preliminary tuaiutsB had
been run through, but judge Merritt
answered that there were other cases
upon the calendar which must tako
precedence,
District Attorney Judd remarked
that "thCs' personal liberty cases" had
always hnu preference over other
ma,,urr; hu uddUI, however, that ~ fag
aH the territory was concerned, !.
would not suffer boy waiting, o. tho
prosecution held possession VI the dc.
lunduutH who now petitiJnud.
Tue court irtlmatci that the attgr.
neys could bu within reach, and " tho
other cases had been disposed OF In time
today thc hubcua cJGpus CnueH might
then DO takon up.
inns COURT REVERSED.
In the case OF the Southern Psolno
company vs. Isabella Suluy, admins.
ttatrlK VI the estate Of VIM. ii. Buley,
deceased, the mandate Of thu Supreme
Court Oi the United was read aud
filed.
The Judgment Of the Territorial
| supreme Court, affirming that OF tho
| district court is reversed, with costs;
"aul that tho said appellant, the
| Southern Pacific company, recover
against the baid respondent szl7.25 for
lie costs herein expended, nnd have
execution therefor" lt is further
ordered that the cause be femanded 10
! wv ANAAAAAAAh NANNuAAN ANANA WIN
directions 70 order nrw trial.
Ihs OpinlJu 0i this court was by
Chief Justice Zane, Judges Anderson
anu blackburn cOuCutrlug,
FENroS PURSUITS THEM
Attorney Pence Pence & Allon) on
behalf " 3. r. FontOu, doing business
az the lntOT.MOuutsin Electric Co.,
presented petition Tor writ Of man
date agulnbi the county court OF Salt
Lake county, viz; Probate Judge Blair,
5s'gClmaul GBllgs, II burts aud Chris.
| tuphufaDu. Tho matter aTlsOs cut OF
the contract entered into by the petit
tiJvUr with tue members OF the latB
r0" ~ court Tor the erection II certain
lamp p0sta, tho supplying Of globes anu
electric wiring OF tue grounds OF tho
new lliut city uui county building, iu
tho sum OF yiji6S, AN appropriation
Tor which tue new bJagI has roiuso1 to
make.
The facts In this case was stated In
Saturdays NEWS.
The court took the application under
advisemen,.
"IIOusoN's CHOICE"
Attorney Jamos A. Williams, acting
Tor the appellant Ia the Csse Of Martha
Ann COOmbl vs. the Salt Lake 4 Fort
Douglas Railway 90, ct Ai,trsponuonts,
moved that the respondents DO not MI
lowed 10 DO hoard on tho merits u this
cause on oral argument, thUy having
failed 90 nlD their uTivi within the
slatutUTy five days after tho serving
~ appellants uriui upon them. APP
ptilnut was "Wililup, however, that
respondents uuaIH the PENALTY Of tho
rule upon paying the clcrk VI this court,
lee Jru The day Of argument, tao sum VI
$50 for the appellant"
IakeH under Guylsgment.
SHOULD IA ne USANiMous?
G. j.. Msckey, plaintiff, and appel.
liant, Va H.. LuEsnspgrgtE defendant
and TU'pOuiauL
Booth, Lro aud Gray Tor tho appel.
laul; PowoIs * liilrs aud ID. n. 5,Taup
for tue respondent
Ia the 'lhi,J district court upon
TRIAL Of the Gaze, the jury found TOT tbs
Defendant, ana tho only point now re-
lied upOu by tho appellant for at
reversal was that the Jurors were not
unanimous ln their finding. This c0uft
10 now asked to hold that tho statute
OF the Territory, which authorizes
verdict in civil case " DO found by
nino lurors, Is invalid, as being In Con-
trayauti0n OF the Organic act OF this
Territory aud OF article q, or tho Sew
tulh amendment 10 the Consultation VI
the United slatus,
4 REHEAR1Nd.
Iu the reheatiug u the case OF VIM.
| =. McCoruick, plaintiff and TsspOud-
| snt, Va Henry Sa1lur, duiendAnt and
appellant, the latter was represented
by tSutheTland d HowRt aud AttOI-
ney Chas. BALDWIN; for the respondent,
Brown 4 Hendouon anu Attorney q.
3. Narign,
Tho case is one OF long standing ana
the particulars have been already
several times published. In brief,
Sadlur entered iutJ an agreement with
Taft d kr0pfgauz, contractors, 10 build
house tor him, anu this was CONE
pletrd In 1890. The contractors were
heavily indebted to Mccormick at this
time and assigned 10 him the balance
VI the account due % them from
sadler, viz, s2826.2j. Suit was
brought ia the Third district court 10
recover this, and tue jury found for the
4 G. D % a