The San Francisco call., 1895-12-29
way to do it and that is by producing the files
of The SheDherd of the Valley


way to do it and that is by producing the files
of the Shepherd of the Valley.
CONCERNING QUOTATION NO. 8.
From Brownson's Quarterly Review for Oc-
tober 1852, he quoted words which deny toll
erance to the sects. In answer 1 demanded
that he produce his authorities. "FalSe in one,
false in alp renders his words suspect The
reply received is: "He has brought no evi-
dence to disprove my quotation from Brown
sens Quarterly Review Tor October, 1852, nor
can he ever bring such evidence" No, Mr.
Editor have brought no evidence, for know
of no charge. When DR.. Case produces Brown
sons Review then WIZ deal with the quota
ton. / am not compelled By any rules OF con-
troversy to accept the word of man who has
been proven untruthful. Produce your book,
Dr. Case.
CONCERNING QUOTATION NO. 4.
From the New York Tablet he quoted words
which Justify the persecution OF Protestant
missionaries. To this l replied, 'I believe
your quotation a forgery. Produce the New
York Tablet" His answeris: "He he's brought
no evidence to disprove my quotation from the
New York Tablet, nor can ne ever produce
creditable testimony against it," OF course I
have brought no evidence against what 1 do
not believe exists. II l should say the sEast-
ern Screecher" says that cdr. Case was run out
OF Ohio" and if DR.. Case demanded the pro-
duction of the Screscher might triumphantly
rerort cdr. Case has Drought no evidence to
prove that he was never run out of Ohio, nor
can he ever prove 1T.
coNcERNlyG QUOTATION NO. 5.
From Father Hecker he quoted words which
depiore the sorry condition OF the church, and
ascribe the cause to priestly domination.
In answer charged that DR.. Case had fd)
suppressed sentences, (b) omitted paragraphs,
(c) put into he mouth CT Father Hecker senti-
ments he abhorred. DR.. Case replied by print
ing the whole extract, showing that (a) he had
omitted sentences, (b)that he had supprea sed
paragraphs, and then he blames the distortion
OF meaning upon the peragrapher.
DR.. Case attempts to make capital out of an
unessen ntial point. I stated that the extract
was taken from the preface, Technically, /
was wrong. The extract is taken from the
opening words OF the book and is headed, "The
question stated" l sent the book married, to
The CALL office, and my mistake had no bear
ing whatsoever on the truth of my charges
that DR.. Case had vamped the quotation.
CONCERNING QUOTATION 6.
From Gury's Compendium of Theology" Dr.
Case quoted a question, "Are ecelesiastics
obliged TO obey the civil law?" and he quoted
the answer as "No." n answer. MI. Editor. l
sent to your Office "Gury's Compendium" and
pointed out the page OF which the question
occurred and showed that the answer was
yes. In reply DR.. Case oeciared that Catholics
had two editions OF Gury-one for the priests
ana one Tor the laty. In rebuttal gave my
testimony that the edition lying in your Office
was designed Tor the use OF priests, and /
called on Dr. Case to produce any edition OF
ecclesastics bound 10 obey the civil laws?"
and answers it with "No." Dr. Case replies
that his quotation is correct and that he can
Now; NJ. Editor, there is no need OF Mr.
Cases packing down his tons of literature TO
your Office. / an sure you have enough of
rubbish for the ashman without adding Dr.
Cases library. All that is necessary is to pro-
duce this Que booE. Let the public see, DR..
Case that you age not consciously dishonest
If you have Curry which puts that question
and answers il with . no produce it. Remem-
Der your character is al stake. Before the
people a this City charge you with one OF the
.rp l.,fffl II nyla- oh
another. In controversy with q certain
church ycu have POISONED the wells You are
on trial. not before Catholics, but before
Protesta IS, aud especially before the Metho-
dist community, which has To bear the shame
of having pfoduced such man as you. Ii you
have no regard for your own character have
regard at least for the character of your de-
nomination.
No more disgraceful accusation could be
made against man tnen that which here and
now | make against you. You have taken q
for "yes.' and you have come before the pub
lie and given your forgery currency as genuine
coin. You can only clear Yourself by produ-
eng the book. Again cali upon you to pro-
duce it or forever stand before the people of
this City with brand more shameful than
that OF Cain upon your brow. Yours truly,
PC. YoRKE.
PosTsCRIPTUM
G. a. Hubbell has, Mr.. Editor, justified my
description OF him. He is among men what
the polecat is among vermin. | regret that it
Las seeD necessary lot me 10 lOucn him even
with q very long pole. The interests of the
public health, however, demand that be be
disloGged, and dislodged he shall be, even
though the State is compelled to hold its uni
versst nose.
6. A. HuDbell is believer in the motto that
The scissors is mightier than the pen, and that
II eccngn OF mud is thrown some OF it is sure
20 stick, He has, therefore, flooded your
columns with clippings from the American
Patriot. might humbly suggest that he can
with impunity help himself TO that other
specimen Of pornography known Us the A. P.
A. magG line, now that its patriotic editor is in
jail.
1t would be useless and absurd for me to fol-
low g. A. Hubbell and characterize the new
forgeries he foists upon the public. Let me
simply remind your readers that until he
meets The sworn statements of Father PrendeT-
man can trust him. These priests have de-
c.ared on oath that two documents produced
Dy Hubbell are forgeries. Hubbell has not
dared TO meet the accusation.
l.. he believes that his documents are genu-
inc be must believe that these three priests
age OF your convictions George Andrew Hub
bell? viii you dare say that these oaths were
sworn falsely? Ghoul tnat you are You violate
the graves OF the dead. The priest you name tnis
morning is before his God, else your currish
soul would not have siandered him By lnlu.
not among the tombs. Here are three men
whose words have scared your flesh as iha
branding iron sears the flesh of the galley
slave. They are, the three of them, in this
City known TO its inhabitants. Will you dare
dispute their affidavts2 This is the test
George Andrew Hubbell, which no decent man
would fear TO face, but which you shrink from
as the vicious cur shrinks from his ma es's
whip, and the convict from the triangle end
the lash. P.C.Y.