Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1895-09-23
HIS STORY OF SHANE,
ccortinusd rom Page ons)


mo'u0 ad done such thlngi
sns ,.a repIy WIS that che was tired
h nu a. she had done. and "sh'
,ha name, and might as well h.Ne
10 ,.,sme.O Kelsey then said Mrs'
we ss,ad askei what he would ~
D., sa aid he would not marry her
~ Ind eontfibuts 20 support net
t9 Ply 4. oould fsf orm. and then 10 SUI.
tbs ohiId. He agreed TO give soO
o.' ,,,nin Tor her, ami then thu 50
W ~, Inc child. After then ine
N,aiia offered q take $1,000 ~ :
ps,isrnsni. aud TO 20 away. He said
s.sna,,II moi do that, but no woul Z
~ t"h $500 for them 10 60 away With,
VI s,u,e 10 support them. rms was
hnu s,is agreed upon, aud they
h.,t .wuv. The mother said that II
hs would not marry her uaughler ehp
c,nld not stay here win the disgrace,
snd this led TO the arrangements 10 80
away. At. c.,o,a,o .xn,.,-
snce. Mr.. Kelsey said he saw plhntin
An the May following their departure
from this city. He Visited her mouse
10 dav he arrived Ia Denver, aitnf
,sgl,ieflnR at the ~. James hotel. he
ih,re gave her $3.50. Ho femalnei y
Denver from the marning OF May 10
M evening Of May 2. He diu not
,av AZ plalnth's aud was net Intro
dneed % her husband. nor did ho 10.
ts,ducs her % his wife. lie hai tus'-
No., In Denver Ia August, 1883, which
he dld mot remember; called on tue
nl,inif; always called on tho plsin-
,,a when IN Denver, and gave her
mepSy, In August, 1850, he bad bovn
lad Of The birth Of the child, and went
~ Denver after receipt Of the news;
save he plaintiff $500 ther; was next
IN Denvrr In Apni 1872, ON hii
way d Ohloago; stopped lhoro asaiI
an mis- return from ChiuagO. Dsnled
bsing introduced ~ the plaintiffs
hnsbsni on either OF these occasions.
Heuext saw tho defendant In Col.
ondo 10 August, 1891, at Mani.ou
snflngs. H. fesiitcroi At the Barker
Heu.e, AnJ made Inquiries for the
R11kery, ~ he wished to 500 the plain
ma. He found her and gave her
nancy, Then he secured a rom al
toe Rookory and stayed there. lie
neat went u Colorado Syringe, aud
then 10 Denver. Dii MT occupy the
room al tho Rookery with tho plaintiff
A. his wife. lie went 10 Manitou
spfngs % 500 the plaintiff, Knowing
he was there. Ho had sent Telegram
10 her, addressing her ~ Mfs. Saddles
Kuloy, at her request, made In q letter
10 him from her.
The letter was Identified, ~ wetp
olhers In which the plaintiff requested
him 10 address her as Mrs. ;. kAsley.
Kelsey stated that no knew the plAiu-
uii's signature, hs he had seen II about
800 limOl. He had two or three hun.
bred letters from hof.
Continuing, Mt. kelsey said he went
10 MAniiou August li.b OF 10Th, ami
left Denver on the goth or 2lsi. lie
denied living with tho plninti1 then.
He did net see her again In Denver
an lse3. This was the last timo no
saw her there. He went TO raise mo1s
for the boulevard. Then he went "
Colorado Springs and TO Rico. Called
on the plainiin and gave her money.
TheJ did not live together rs husband
and wife.
In Bait Lake City, no me, tho plain
ia In July, 1890, whom she came from
beaver. She stopped ut the Walker
House, but he did not know that eho
fsglilefed "A Mrs. kelsey. He never
speut q night there. Saw her In this
tliy again In 1892, nj the Walker.
Never know she registered any where
10 Mn. Kelsey; had never authorizes
her 10 do 70; had never introduced her
10 anybody.
The $500 certificate OF deposit an
lot Of drafts, showing money given TO
the plaintiff, were identified and
placed In evidence.
Mr., Kelsey further testiflod that he
never saw DR.. Cook, Of Denver, aud
was not introduced TO him. He knew
An. Powers and her daughter. Rs
msmbsrsd having seen Mrs. Powers At
Manitou, and also n little girl. but
could not say u was tue same one who
tuined here. He denied having boon
Introduced 10 her at Manitou AZ tho
husband Of tho plaintiff. Shs had In.
iioduosd him 10 Mr.. Rogers there.
The last money Kelsey gave lhs
plaintiff was June 20, 1893 He ceased
giving her money because no had
learned that In 1892 sho had visited At
iofney Baldwin IA this city for the pur.
pose Of planting n suit against him, Hnd
he had been told ny J0hnD. Kinney that
'ah old man had said my wiie"-hsre
The deinndHnt caught himself "that
ME-. Kelsey was going 10 sue for d.
VERGE. l thought II was about time 20
qall, as these things might further
eomplioate me.p
Kelsey ,aid this was the frat tune no
know plaintiff wRs claiming 10 DO his
vile He never gave her authority 10
use bis name. a letter addroHssi
My Dear Lewis," IRON the plaintiff,
was read, In which she tolu OF getting
Acheaper hotel than the Walker, ana
aging that while he did not wish TO
come and zee her he might do % with.
out u being known TO others. Kelsey
lhoh said lie had n conversation In
1888 with Mr.. Hansen, reporter OF the
Nkws, regarding nm article published
IN Denver paper. To the reporter
Mt. kelsey hAc ttated the story was o
base fabrication, and n the news pub
ushed II, witness would institute
suit for libel. Tho witness then went
70 SEQ tho edltor.in-chio'. Mt. kelsey
denied saying to Mr.. Hansen that the
plaintiff had been his wife bat WAS not
now. Mr.. J. X. Gillespie heard
lhe conversation and took part
In II. The witness also de-
MED having told tbs plsinufi she
was not his wife, Never converted
with her on the subject; and never
lold her mother they were married,
nor DID he say to the mother that II no
married anybody II would be her
daughter Saddles.
Other letters Of the plaintiff 10 tho
defendant were offered in evidence.
Ihey were OF a pleaiing, pitiiul chat
seler, telling the almost breaking OF n