The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1895-05-18
Ln,v and nIotion nrhera.

R. D. Winters VS.. W. E. Viglini ct
al; plaintiffs motion for appointment
of a receiver argued and submitted.
Mrs. Rebecca A. Sawyer VS.. Isaac
Hunter; motion to strike answeS-fron
files overruled.
Salt Lake Valley Loan and Trust
Company VS.. Home Fire Insurance
Company; demurrer to complaint over
ruled and twenty days to answer.
benjamin Fullmer vs.. Salt Lake City
Railway Company; motion 10 retaH
costs oVerruled.
In the matter Of the estate of Oscar
A. Amey, deceased; motion for new
trial overruled.
o. w. Powers VS.. Thomas F. Null
vaney; demurrer to complaint over
ruled and twenty days to answer.
Hannah E. Obrian VS.. John I. Will
son ct. al; demurrer to complaint over
ruled; answer filed.
Chester Call VS.. Union Pacific Rail
way company; motion for new trial
passed.
State Bank of Utah VS.. John T. Rich
ct. al; motion to modify order appoint
ing receiver passed.
Clara Dickert VS.. Ferdinand Dickert
demurrer to complaint passed.
L. w. Dutman vs.. Henry Denhalter;
motion to retax costs settled
Gustave Kroeger ETC., VS.. the Brig,
ham Young Academy et al; on motion
to set aside demurrer and for judgment
on pleadings; death of defendant A o
Smoot suggested and leave granted to
substitute administrators of his estate;
plaintiff valves motion for judgment
on pleadings: demurrer sustained and
ten days allowed to amend.
NJ J. Weeks VS.. Dalton Gold Mining
and Milling company: motion for a new
trial stricken from the calendar.
4. F. Keyser VS.. z. A. Lawrence ct.
complaint Withdrawn and ten days t.
answer.
Jesse W. Crosby, jr, VS.. D. w Sui
Ivan ct. al; hearing on demurrer to
complaint passed.
Mary E. Brown VS.. Fraternal Ac-
cident association; motion to vacate
and set aside summons 'overruled and
thirty days allowed to answer on
pleadings.
Esther Miller VS. Glen Miller ct. al
demurrers to complaint Withdrawn anG
twenty days to answer
Mary E. Brown VS.. Charles B Mark
land; demurrer to complaint withdrawn
and ten days to answer.
John McCarton VS.. Pho Grande West
ern Railway companyt hearing on mo-
ton for new trial passed.
Clara E. Podlech VS. Patrick Phelan
ct. al; motion for new trial argued
and submitted.
Edwin Entwistle VS.. Elizabeth Drake
Roundy; motion for a new trial
stricken from the calendar.
When making pastry. biscuit, dough-
nuts, cookies. cakes, remember that
less of DR.. Prices Baking Powder is
required than of any other.
Referees Findings Confirmed.
Chief Justice Merritt yesterday con
firmed the findings of the referee in
the three cases of Frank Hoffma n.
Henry Denhalter and Liberty E. Hol-
den VS.. Thomas Venard, and Judgment
was entered accordingly. The cases
were heard on August Is, 1891, by judge
Merritt, then sitting as referee, and
the findings were that the location al
legged in the complaint az the ruirrh
mining claim is not legal one, for
the reason that the point of discovery
was upon premises already owned and
occupied, and that the adverse claim
upon which application for , patent is
made, called the Condor No. 9. is Illegal
mineral land was made by the de-
PENDANTS upon any lode Or vein of rock
in place bearing valuable minerals
That the Condor No. 2 was upon
premises already occupied belonging f.
other parties. and that neither of the
parties are entitled to the premises in
In the other two suits the plaintiffs
are adjudged to be the owners of the
North and South Eldorado claims.