The times. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1890-1903, 1895-07-03

a new certificate Of deposit for the $50.
Hc had 81 - to his credit on ,"' L'tn OF
june. This sum ne drew on. py TWO
checks OF June 18th and June o,h'
His next three deposits wt,IIe for 80
carn and were drawn OUT. i,'a "tioslt
iu september was for 50. ana was drawn
out in two checks balancing the account
captain Wise proceeded along this line
Boy The testimony OF Mr. Gosn'H.
captain WI, 90 took the VIII ~ lhrorgh
an tho deposits made ana c"'e - -, "IaE J, ~
during 1880 10 1895. sho~lhs' .LSl Sindii
dep. Sits. quickly checked out tnen good
s.I 4 deposits. sOmctimcs dcpo7iIcd In the
name Of John r. Massey ~ ~ Hpli
times 10 tho certificate %. HSlDf' 1901. '"uli''
agl sonctlTcs 10 an indiViaNu pr, cunt.
TO-" cross-eXamlnailon .r,i'. az
So .toly nothing new or OF general in-
tcrHsL
OTHER BOOK ACCOUNTS
The deposition Of &. D lisnbournc.
,licr Of the Bank Of AiheIl1ii'' Va
u0~ cad ana offered in c.l.'n.e' also
ths deposition OF y. G.. ilann't,t.n. cash
icr OF tho Peoples National Bank, oil
Charlotte syilic. Va.
Iauuc ean's deposition shovel mat on
4 u II, 1894, Mrs Matte i- ~ a'-
pa lel the sum Of 500 In il7 naNk. J. ho
M ter objected 10 in this deio. ION ~ 70
pfe lous point OF the trm Wa ND" i'N'n
up gain by Captain Wi7e. WHO iueni-
ly alluded TO II as "sidc-s now that
too. place during The iakins ,i ianna-
"a deposition. Judge It-,.1 state
tna' 1c would rule out inc 7Hi' 'nuods
lct tNfa OF Mr.. Massey tmnp-t.i iN flan-
ut-.i.s S deposition. as onJtCtt ht tH'
Ger h.e, and stated TO Captain Wise thtl
he aced not read thcm.
mnagau's deposition sia,'I mat ne
r't i.cd Mr. Massey as q pro 'ia am
thliiy man. Captain Wise read gre staio-
m.ul Of Mr. Masscy's account in the
Bank OF Aiocmaric, ano" "l"- "tlosi Us
from 50 70 500, cacn deposit being check
Cd Out shortly after being dti 'sl.fI un-
III it became OvcTIrdWn, ana Delns otci-
drawn until IL was closed F check
mah.ns good the OvcrlraiI II ll'N read
statement of plalutu 5 account WIN the
bans ln Charlottesville, Whicl showed a
sim ar state OF debts ana ere lts, though
on s3mcw hat larger scale. pre- D' post
wee quickly drawn out after n''Ns made,
ana iie balance was shown ID IT. clut4u-
udA! al a low point
TILT BETWEEN COUNSEL.
Captain Wise offered the deaI between
A. g. IaNnc ana wife and John J.. Massey,
as iD the transfer OF the house ln Char
lOft,sNiilc. Va. 4 tlt occurred hesa le-
tween the opposing cOunsei Over the
admission OF deposition Oiirl'" ht the
defence. The Judge ruled D. 'ut upon
the ground that the plaint1 S COUNSEL
had not been given suincltnt Aotlcr that
the deposition WAS 20 DE taken. ne Acld
that tu" tWcnty-iOur hours as llt a
Sulilceut length of time.
Captain Wise. All right, We viii g.t il
I'm iu another shape. There bong some
discussion as to inc delay h 'AaHln-
ing Witnesses, captain Niac 7t't't mat
thc defendants hoped 10 get i.iou-N of
FERNS their testimony hy tomorrow
night whoreup0n Mr. Thorn stated 10
the Judge that plaintiffs cOnN1'i would
nc-i hrir Witnesses on Friday next ana
asked That they be notified.
MAssEY's PROPERTY.
Captain Wise again took up the deposit
tious and read from that Of .Ac assess
sor Of Charlottesville and the Gown ser-
geani. That of the assessor Sa.. the
assessed value of Mr.. MasScs estate.
lie also offered in evidence ana read
the dec sion in the ease Of J oNn- ct ais
vs. John t.. Massey It ais, WI p Was am
action made TO subject fifty snarts OF
the capital stock of the Virginia Land and
Loan 10. TO d garnishee process o. satisfy
his debts. Judge Richardson o.uNclel
the opinion. which was TO the u thai
the transfer of the said shar o' .alll"I
stock Was Illegal, and that i' shafes
were the property of john J.. Massey
and subject 10 gar1isn'e.
HIS Wits PROPERTY.
Judge Heath read dispositions show ing
mo value of the estate of tine father OF
Mrs Massey. the distribution oi th" sald
estate prior to beer marriage 10 -ii- Mas
eey, also the value of the BUSINESS "i
McCr.ar- * Co.. iu whieh business ii
is claimed Mrs Massey was mt're.siei 4
with Aer brothers prior to her malllase
To Ar Massey. the significance oi lllS
testimony evidently beng 10 fNoM '''
value of Mrs Massey's estate al ihe
time of her marriage. As Judge tieai ID
finished reading the depos ons me
court adiourncd dt being after 70 cloch)
until tomorrow al l0o1.
NAY BrGIN ARGUING MONDAY.
II IS probable that argument before
the Jury VIII begin next Monday. t dc-
fence IS not mistaken ln bcNrNine al4
lis testimony can De gotten hy to-mof-
row nrhf. It is not thought that the
plaintiffs evidence in rebIttal VIII con-
sumo more than two days.