Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1895-04-12
FORTY DAYS GONE.
r,d,I,lIyl Article Under Discussion
All Forenoon
ru,r DEMOCRATIC INHIBITION
q. ,..,tt,d In another Long Discussion
nut Finally Passed on Vote
of57 to %.
,u,r DEMOCRATIC INHIBITION.

Of 81 TO %.
r,. constitutional Convention
.'.r,d the ioftictn DAY Of its session
mi, morning, tue time originally
,s.p,Dt suniclsut 90 complete De
49,, But it bias stlll q lsrge am uni
.,,,,ipr.s to dispose Of and tue rf-t
,,I. Bsys While not numbered sp,cih-
.,i,y. afs yaflUusiy .umated ai from
ro 10 twenty, VITA tue chances
,t,fit will run nearer ~ tho latter
,t,g the former limit That means
n,ts good deal Of the remaining work
,.In bnv,tl budout without pny Hs tht
,t,i5psy resolution adopted osFly In
,te ssssi8n makes thlt obligatory un'
I,, lrrc b. q rcclusidsrstion, '0mo.
dining altogether improbable.
Tbr Convention went into session
,fl0a. m, President Smith To- the
chair r.hty.0ac dclegaSra answered
ptls.f uamr., and the Rfv. q. ~.
Jaylr. %. tue Second MotuUdisi Ipi-'
canal church, offered rrayoE The
.siru1l Of yosierlay'a session was
ftal. ,.
lion 81 woman suffrage Ia the loustl'
rlt1u we're presented ne ioiloWt' by
Love, OF BlX Elder .a, names hJ
Murdoch, OF Beaver -lN, by thurd'
tsf. OF Garfield, -,I'j, divided a. Toll
I6v,! salt Lake Ctg L0ll, Dewey.
vino. Box Elder county lUG LrrIb
WasauclOu county, .B Utah county
IH. spuug city, Sanpu.r county, .'ii
Nanu. Sauruiu county .Jli Salt LAKE
e5lrty. 90, by Peter, B.A LluuS
u..uiIuus passed NJ Brigham Ciy anu
%. fguAiurcs.
lJU SEPARATE SUBMISSION,
rly following uUtlilon. were pre-.
,satci aeEiuE i1r a separate admission
ulle woman sulmgo argiclC
By G5JIwiu, salt Lake, u; by
Gllvu. Salt Lake, 30; ~ Howard,
Emtfy, 81, 10y MaughAu, Cache, lu2i
Bnadry, -ovisr Hl; Greer, Uhh, 50;
C5imhu, Utah, %, squire, Salt Lake,
=, -QWfus, Salt LaAr, 90, Hnyuus,
SIT LaEr, %; L'IrsIg,, summit. 1913;
la.tu1r, Cagur, b. -quirrs, salt
lake, Ul slower IuUtlr, 10; wins,
Wuhiug.I., a.; lvius, Washington,
%, kltsoI, Weber, DO; Klo,el, Wturr,
, rs,ru Box EiirT 90.
ApATmOTiC CONSTITUENT.
Accompanying one Of the petitions
20, ltpia,u submission presented by
lyIl1 wee note VI winch tue following
AtiJatlm copy, Aud the reading N
sa.slty tue gentleman from Wash
ilgtHcius-d u burst u msfrimen':
imifi tor you iollors To make Com
t.a1 and uoN make DO according 10
Fafgau JudImuui, and ( will vote Tor
Raleigh, NJ salt Lake, presented
isaiuu sigucu ny George 4. Glud.
VIC and forty -Iuyrn others asking that
iulibllI0u be submitted the voters
jlhc Territory as a separate article.
THE LEGISLATIVE ARTICLE.
AZ this part OF the proceedings the
.gls.uuvr article was taken ~ on
,lI'l reading ~ reported from the COM
uIIrr uituo whole.
AGAINST LOTTERY SCHEMES.
E.guuor moved 10 strike out section
%. which roads M follows, saying tue
lnlrl States laws we're sufficient 10
Project tho state:
"lhr Legislature shall not authorizes
Any gene Of chance, lottery Ur giil
taigflusr, under any pfrtunse Or Tor
hDy purpose whats1rvrr.n
h'Wllu aud Van Horne took hu OF.
lsia view Aud called attention IL
NaNn Dakota which omitted inserting
tlgu d session "a ila constitution. Tie
Jesuit Wa, they saiI, that tho legis.
Muig " that state was swOOped down
uplu by the Louisiana Lottery repre-.
i5uiauyUs with money and pfustig,
appealing Tor permission ~ carry ON
bu'intfs Ia the state.
Eyaus, VI Utah, said he WAS oppoFpi
W'tuhluR out the section. IL il wa.
tNMluAlei lhe Legislatures would be-
imprinted ANA hc'eiged with lottery
s.l game promoters asking Tor the
FlINego OF operating Ia the State.
hammond Go Lyaus, ui Weber,
M"l lhIs section prUhiui. huTsr.Tacliil?
~ very load Of such sport,
Lvam-No, siT.
Hnmm"ud-Let II g0 through then.
4 VII vote Tor it with tuat understand.
" because do like morse racing
lLauguler,l
E0hn.Ts motion went down under
aug v.i.ry Of votes.
AMER ulAr "vloromousp SECTION.
Whgu ,busecilon was reached which
w. " Hac'at were !ustrumuntal iu
uA'lng Incorporated iu the lrsl-lnilys
BBN''e Yesterday y tue mid N few
l1'eAna iu the committee OF the
u.' UoViling that the Legislature
. HH'n ul power ~ grant any
s'.'.'y Oh municipality 10 authorize the
a'."nnce " extra clmpen.atlon 10 |
h. CONTRACTOR Tor WORK rpr'0rmsJ
Out. '"~''' W a'tlAu II |
L''na, OF Weber, argued for the TO-
Nj ' ol 'he section In the Conslitu.
Xxx. Iho article, he claimed, had mo |
st'.''AI aspect, and he could moi se, |
GSy gentlemen opposed o.. The aim |
\. In' article was not 10 prohibit IN, |
in,. ' w municipality from guier.ug |
t,,,H proper contracts with insiyIdu.i, |
~ y, maEu 10 impossible Tor s,r. |
CIr w 10 ulply to thr Legislature Dr |
f,3l '.Ihcil Tor udditlUuu! rrs,unorr,
I, contractors haI lelr.tr,ii, |
Nt'IluNtl Tor ur.sf..f..... ...