The Hawaiian gazette. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1865-1918, 1895-10-25
OPINION OF THE COURT, BY FREAR, J.

| This ia An action for SICK Dement'S
from November @ 1898. to September
10 1901 or the rate Of 81 q per day.
an,onnting to s3l4 and interest there.
an vhich the nl.intiff claims to he
ua,ahia 70 hin, hinder the hv.Iaws of
no dafsndant cornoration. of which
% Il q n,an,hsr
Tbe ant;nn uas tried nv the Circuit
Court ;nrv waived and Judgment
.a 1919 for tba nisintiff The de-.
1920 hr;uas the case here on two
oIiamad sves5tions
o. re1atsS to tho admissibilitv of
tbo rooorJs of a former case as evil
Janne 70 sbow tb. stains of the nlain.
tEo W ,har of the defendapt so.
80 ~ ~ nond and;ng and entitled IN
oy 1850 ~ So on Novsn,ber e 1909
SIN .I, one ~ p;oh he racovsrsd sicI
t tne uaoe " Nv tornar cotton and from
1890 49, b. ~ aia;r,s ths same in .bis &C.
WI m,'n NJ ne e sta,ament in the hill of ey
eion 80 ...hn iearnad Indaa in,
1ep.,o uIs, ID ad,,;tted The racords in a
tnrr,ar oasan IL insuffirient Not
n oi ne = - 80 r.ana hnt II does not
Shny, that ony oSiection was made at
III vi ~ r. odn,;ssion Of tho evi-
S Snu =, ior ~, ~ MISREPRESENTATION was taken
ueuoe vi en" 20 oIIowod We
uaer ba,ar odd that we see no rea.
10y, ~" ~ a,,,;danoa was NOT sdmis-
si iii WY 'N' e'eN -
'i1 M o,ber exoent;on was taken to
3D. ss5oo;s;on ord The findings of Law
e INC " e., ,hara;n Snch an excen.
s; 81 ~ -: ~, tno anaraj .nd indefinite IN he
cons;oorsd The object of an excep.
g., as aontannIatea nv the statute
u 80 - 80" RI this Court q snecific
~ e lou, mon which the
Iii oo,rt hoe erroneousIv ruled
- ~ nro;nd;oe Of the marty
sv.n,;no md NOT tn enable a
60, 70 eost rho entira case mon the
80 80 TO- ra,,;a,y Snob a loose method
of practice is Unfair To both the oppo.
~ pi" 49,, ond The conrt See Snencer
Dodd Haw 900. AhlO v. Aiau, s
IL n. Cnrrvy Porter 195 Mass az
Uarriran SANGER az Me 442.
pnt TbiIs boIding that this excep-
ton shonId he dismissed on the
aron,d that II is foo general. vet as
tbora hos hsan some Iaxitv in this
rasreot in tho mast we shall i'm this
osse cons;dar hrtefiv the points raised
hv oounsei in their brief especialIy as
H. ras,,It will no tho same
EirS, that the eranting of sick ben.
osts - The frst Instance was
irran,,ar for the alleged rea-
Co., rat tba nlaintiff hsd not fur-
n;sbed tho reonired nhvsician's
oart;f;oote The finding of the trial
oonrt uyas ono of fact and. like the
Idiot ~ a ;urv cannot he set aside.
,hara ha;n, snfficiant evidence tn sun.
mort il Without saving whether the
bv-Iaws made snch a certificate
- rao,,;s;ta in q case of This kind II
!. snsfa;.nt 70 Gov that tho record in
H. tnrn,ar osSs was strong If NOT con.
oIns;ya evidence that IN. grant of sick
hanaf;,s nos in fact TeouIaT in the first
;nstsnco
SanondIv tbat 10 tho society waiyed
,bo rann; rsnoant NJ the certificate in
the :; rdt ;nstance II atterward rermin-
81 tho waiver hv ire reiusal to con
,;nna the benefits and nv its answer
la dafanoo in tbs f;rst case IF a.
fnnnS ~ he a fact NV the trial conrt
H. 80, Nos rsouIsr in the frat in
$50 Voc rsfn.al tn nav conId |
,,o, ta,r,;nats tho liability
Th;rdIv that IL the nlaintiff is only /
.an',nray,Iv sict he belongs To the
oIass ont;,isd 70 i.simnIv medical at /
I'D tandanna and medicine. " and not to
The class entitled tn 81 d per dav.
sinos his Illness does not wholly pre-
49, h;n, from working This noint
" hosod on an erroneous English
of the bv.Iaws. the origi.