Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1895-06-22
The DISTRICT COURT.
DIyOrcs Cases Heard by Judge Merritt
Today,
COPPER PLANT 10 ne SOLD.
HlnIug Case Dlsmissed-Ice Company
Officers 10 show Cause For
Contempt.

Tplfd district court today.
In tue divorce case Of Emma l..
Paterson Va Andrew J. Peterson, order
t,,how cause why temporary alimJBy
,hould not be paid, Attorney +. %,
gtsphens Appeared for the plaintiff and
Attorney bippman TOT the deienso.
Itisset forth tnat the parties i've at
Park CITY, and that thsy were msl-
ued In 1898 and had one child, Of
which shc asked Tor the custody
ueudiug tho hlal hearing. II h oil.
leseI that Defendant has a une.half
iptores. la ranch worth about 5000,
cattle 81 900 ani farming machinery.
mrs Fetorson was sworn AuI testified
tha, she resiirs at Park Cily, was
married 10 deien Iaht Ga 1898. a child
was bora last October, when she was
taken nick with typhoid fever ana to.
malned W lot three months. Her nus.
band took the child away aud placed II
lu tbs care OF his mother, aud when che
recovered refused to return ~ ~ her.
Bnu said defendant owned onc.half
Interest In nuch containing 200
ncfos Of lani, besides ttams, cattle,
machinery, etc. In 1894 nu sold a soda
factory uu1 mousse anu lot to purchase
the ranch. she had no property "
support herself and Kept hOutO Tor n
iamily IN Park cry.
CfIsi-UKnmtned she sliJ she was
tlTniug - a week, which was not
tuniliunt 10 support her. sac wAl 10
debt some now for clothing nud also Tor
doctor bills for attention during hHr
rcsn,ta Whul she left tho ranch she
tUlK only few rucles with her.
defendant Peterson waB thon sworn
and iuatitivd that she LETT him iu
june, 1894 He supported her until
February lgst, lie was In the sIda
wafer pui beer buslutrb uuiil he iailCi
aui had o. lee u Rr. Hu was out Of
vmplUymeut aud HAD been livlug with
his mother on the ranch, but lust 60
hello her but had no interest ihrToiD.
Wien cf0ss.eEamlnud be said hu anu
lived "a tue rauCh and operate II Ia
connection with ms brother. lie uad
few pouios but rO,hing else TO speak
az. He said ho hal no interest la thr
ancu, ~ 10 had not been divided, huy-
log been loit ~ his mother By her
father. They had boon running an ice
pJnd which hal brought IN about $500
last year lie handled tho money but
only as attorney for his mother. lilo
said lac was about IS years Of age, but
had no means OF support.
The court questioned the witnGsl ~
10 his sincerity, nnd whether no WAS
trying 10 avoid supporting his wife,
anu then ordered tnst ho pay her $40
per month almony; f25 expense
money, and $50 attorneys feet.
TWO DIVORCES GRANTED.
In tho divorce sui, OF WIN. n. Green
". Susan Green, decree OF divorce
Wts granted.
Dauiel w. Jnnet. a decree OF divorce
wa entered by default anu SO month
alimOny aud s9j attorney, fees was
SLOWED. From Ihe evidence II appears
that they were married In 1859, but
defendant had not lived with her or
given her any support since 1893.
In the cRso VI Daniel A, Raleigh vs..
A, T.. Raleigh, plaintiff was given
leave 10 Withdraw summons for
amendment Of return aud for further
tefylUU.
DISMISSED ny CONSENT.
In the case OF tho Niagara Mining
and Smelling company for Point Look.
out mining claim, W. James w. Ken
utuy et nj, for San Francisco mining
claim, oruers made setting aside Jug.
ment, ana Diminishing action, by ooH.
fcgt, ~ d0iendHnps coste.
AGAINST THE COPPER PLANT.
In the case OF Daniel Dryer and
John CosgrOye. VI the Salt Lake CITY
Copper Manufacturing company ct nj,
delenlhnts, the report OF the referee
Was amended anu adopted. The decree
OF the court was that tnUTe was duu 10
the plaintiffs from the Salt Lake CITY
copper Manufacturing company the
sam " IS, 1920, Including Interest,
Tot material aud labor, ana that plain
uils have n hfst lien on the premises VI
Tue copper plant company, IL Is iut.
lhvr dccfusd that said premiSts bs
iyll 90 public auction together with all
'lhr smelling anu refining, electro.
yueal, plantH, tVnementg, heTedita.
ments and appurtouauoes thefouut1
uelJhglnK or Ia any wise HppeItain-
lng," comprising the entire plant. II
u luflher decTeed that N the proceeds
u such sale arc not sufficient 10 pay
lhctaid Indebtedness with all expenses,
Tue marshal shall specify the amount
Q. TIE deficiency anu, n judgment for
sl.u amount shall be declared against
'he ueientaDls.
OTHER CASES.
Ia the case OF Henry WAGNER vs.A.
:, Ptturfun, an order was made citing
W. ID. Dodge aud W. a. Gibson,
PRESIDENT ana secretary Uf the SalG
lake Ice company 10 appear before
'Nu court and show cause why they
should not be- adIudged In contempt
Tor not answering before Referee IL.
Shields.
In tie case OF l.. w. Dltiman W. w.
r. o'Meata, Defendant was allowed
Ten days additional tins to prepare
uuterve statement on motion for u
new trial.
,- Ia the case OF Mary Nolsin Va.
luoele county, defendant allowed
Wtu.y days additional time TO iile
talement on motion Tor q new trial.
q, "a tho clss OF Aibinus Nance VI. +.
w. Heath, 81 81, default was 0nlsEed
against detendants +. O.. Henlh, Hem
Helh Heath and Esther Walker, sni !
On motion Of plaintiff an Crder Tor dts |
llasAl as TO all other defendants was
maui Judgment for plAinlifi tor
tha-5'bI A decree Of foreclosure was
slAhlol with tho understanding that |
no uthcloncy judgment be entered !