Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1895-09-27
DONE in OPEN COURT.
Hayken's Other Indictment Alleging
Attempted Bribery.
SETTING or EQUITY CASES.
Suits Dismissed-rha Charge Aga.ast
Mrs. Dutler-0lher Ittmt
OF Interest.

On the opening Of the Third district
court t5dsy. County Attorney White
NJ ore announced that Judge &C. Dsy,
attorney Tor Martin Hayken, the agent
Of this Androws Furniture company.
who Ia already under indictment for
attempting to bribe the eK-scloctmen,
would enter m appearance for the 80.
cutod on another Indictment charging
the came ofiease. Judge Dey entssed
tho sppeafanUs N stated, and was
furnished n copy Of the bill agAinsi his
client. An additional bond Of $1,000
was required on Hayken's behalf. asd
furnished.
The attempt at bribery In the In
dIclment made public today Is In COM
ntoilon with a mombor VI tho City
Council, NJ. J. Chcesoman. Mf.
Cheeseman rejected tho offer. His
r,aicment appeared In tho NEWS
several dsys ago.
Judge Merritt uort took up tho
setting Of the sqully calendar, and
cases were appointed for hearing on
various dates 40 to the 2gnd instant.
After this, business was disposed OF
A. iollowG
Frank Knox W The Grossbsck COM
pany ct Nj; ton days 10 answer.
Hick, Arnold VI II. Elsemsn OF al;
leave TO flo amended complaint.
Edwarl 4. Singer vs. Salt Lake
Copper Manufacturing company OF al;
order TO paint roof OF buildings and TO
pay the Dsggett claim; Oct. 10 set 10
nle answer for A. HAnauer, trustee,
aud +. Pierce substituted Tor Dey a
Street a. attorney.
y. Il. Teasdel Va John X. Reid; sult
dismissed.
Chas. q. Dsy vs. l.. q. Hardy ct nj;
settled aud dismissed.
Glen X. Botbw VI Archie FrAlm
OF al; case referred, and parties 10 agree
upon refeiee.
Esther Walker w Salt Lake City;
casc transferred 10 head OF law calendar
for trial.
Hugh J. Cannon Va Buckhofn Gold
and Silver Mining company OF al;
court orders case referred, aud n par
ties cannot agree on reference tho court
will name one.
10. Mitchell vs. Francis Ps.coe;
suit dismissed.
Thsophilus Parsons W. A. l.. Hyde;
demurrer 10 complaint overruleu;
twenty days TO answer.
A. Cer,ghino vs. Is. Gardells; suit
dismissed.
Frederick Peterson, q native OF swe-
den, was admitted to oitizsnship.
HuTcHIsoN va BUTLRR.
Mrs. Belle Hutohlson made COM
plant before u. Is. Commissioner Som.
mer today, against Mrs. Ella Butler
both reside Ia n lodging house nj ~
east First South street, and the COM
plainAnps description Of the accused
pictured the latter NJ "tefrible with
her tongue when aroused" She said the
police had been afraid TO listen To her
complaint, since they did not dare TO
arrest the offender. Commissioner Som
mer IL not giant physically y, but theex.
preston on his countenanco Indicated
that ho thought the majesty OF his
court could awe into y reasonable de-
gree OF silence even u Nantippe, no ho
Informed Mts. Hulchison that II bsr
cause was just and she was giving an
acourate account Of what had occurred,
he would take appropriate action IN
the case. The police force might be-
scared, hut he believed the shefiff,s
office had tue requisite amount OF
courage, and n tnat did not, tho
United States marshal and militia
would be equal TO tie occasion, In
a.V h. f.Na nj a.
officer. AS n starter, Judge bomuisr
placed the warrant In tho hands OF the
'horiif, who depuioi Deputy Mont
gon'sry To bring IN tue prisoner.
MAY SETTLE IT.
Tho case OF assault against VIM. II.
Boyd, OF the First ward, was set for 10
a. m. today, before u, h. Commissioner
BRENNAN, but suffered 4 postpone
ment I'LL tomorrow. Tbs cause for
this proceeding IL probability that A.
Honsgon, who made this complaint,
and too accused may settle their little
difference and become good friend,
without tbs pressure OF tho criminal
law.
SoTHs.
The trial OF Rober. Egbert and John
GArdner, OF West Jordan, ended In u.
4. Commissioner Pratps courl yesler-
day afternoon alter the NEWS won't 10
press. The court found both defend
ants guilty Of assault, and fined them
Sl0 each aud costs.
Henry HsslAm and Sarah Hsslsm
have begun suit In tho Third distTiot
court against Samuel Hahlam aud
Walker Bros, alleging thut In the year
1891, plaintiffs are Informed nni be-
lieyr, they executed a warranty deed
TO lot 7, block is, ten-acre plat, Big
| Field survey, to defendant Samuel
Haslan, who IL their son. The deed
was placed 10 escrow with Walker
Bros. TO be delivered 10 Samuel Hat
lam upon the death Of Henry Haslam,
aud it still Temgins In the possession VI
Walker Bros. The plaintiffs have de-
manitd IT, return, which WAS refused,
Walker Bros. declaring that they will
del. .sT same 10 Samuel Hasiam &c the
death OF Henry Haslam, according 10
the terms On which IL was deposited
with them. IL Il then alleged that the
decd was obtained by Samuel Ha-lam
without consideration aud by fraud
and dullnoss; that roth plaintiffs are
old, rs aud rs years respectively, and
IN ioeble health, and were ignumnt OF