Washington standard. [volume] (Olympia, Wash. Territory) 1860-1921, 1895-03-22

In the supreme Court opinions il
the following cases have been filed:
Port Townsend National bank. re
spord"m'. v. Andrew WEYMOUTH. al
pc!laut, Jefferson county; affirmed.
lnan Wharf Company, respondent
Y Israel katz, appellant, Jefferson
reversed.
Mar H. Miller, respondent. Y.
Washington Southern Railway Com
pAnY, appellant, \. II. Anderson anc
!. Il. Mcdonald, defendants, King; az
i.rmot.
ota'r "i Washington. respondent
y. N'hc Golden, appellant, King
This appellant WAS one o. party OF
five c! arged with stealing $500 from
two young women in seattle Appel
liant and one Gnodiritnd and one Hart
demanded separate trials and were
convicted. The other two escaped
The Supreme Court finds no merit in
the appeal, and siiirms the decision oil
the lower court.
State of Washington. respondent.
W. otto Stuth, appellant, Thurston
affirmed
4. Libby, respondent. vs.. :. +.
Packwoud, appellant, Pierce motion
denied.
Ray & Co, Il corporation, respond.
cnts, ". scott, liootlcy X Co.. II cor
poration, defendants, and J. F. Nc
Nanght ct al, appellants: This ac-
ton was brought 10y respondents, a
corporation, to foreclose a chattle
mortgage given to secure two prOmis-
sorry notes aggrcgating $1,000. The
judgment appealed from Was affirmed.
First National Bank of Aberdeen
respondent, W. julius Andrews, ap-
pellant, George ii. Keith ct al, de-
PENDANTS. The respondent moves the
court TO strike the statement of facts
from the files herein, and TO dismiss
the appeal upon the grounds that no
notice OF filing the statement OF facts
WAS ever served upon defendant. Keith,
and that no notice, either written or
oral, was ever given him, of the filing,
signing or settling of said statement
OF facts BY the appellant, or by anyone
for him. The judgment Of the court
below is affirmed
State of Washington, appellant, vs.
John Doe Bodeckar, respondent. The
Prosecuting Attorney filed an infor-
nation in the Superior Court of King
county accusing the defendant Of
selling liquor without a license. 1t
does not appear that the defendant
either interposed a motion to set aside
the information or demurrer thereto.
but it does appear that the cause was
regularly called for trial; that a jury
was impaneled and sworn. and that a
witness was called on the part of the
State. The defendant then objected
to the introduction OF any evidence.
for the alleged reason that the infor-
nation does not state an oifenSe The
court, after argument, sustained the
objection, and thereupon released the
defendant from custody, exonerated
his bondsmen and discharged the jury.
From such judgment the State prose-
cutes this appeal. The judgment is
reversed and the cause remanded for
further proceedings in accordance with
the opinion OF the Supreme Court
State of Washington vs. Oliver
Courtemarch. from Clarke County;
appellant convicted of assault to COM
NIT rape and sentenced to three years
in Penitentiary affirmed.
Henry Nelson, appellant, vs. J. w.
Troy, Auditor Clallam county, and A.
a. Richardson, Clerk of that county,
respondents and intervenor. The suit
was to restrain the Auditor from
issue OF warrants to pay Deputy
Clerks. The lower court sustained
Auditors demurrer, and Supreme
Court afiirms that decision.