Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1895-12-23

GU NUN UNNtNNh ~ AUt N'ANuNI J NY
o iur itqutst held over tue hoIy u
q ares Wnl.G.e, who nuicldcl nc
murray on December 18Th. Filed.
CERTIFIED cory.
A certified copy OF tue resolution Of
acceptance Ui tho conditions imposed
hy the 'uniy court on the Big Cotton.
wulj foai matter was submitted by
he company anI iloi'
uACl;uAS DACH 40 ABsrRACrISG.
Gustave II. Bachman, the present
city recorder, being desitOuu VI open
lug ~ ami conducting an nbslraut bus
iueIs, pe,i,loGed for license, author.
,zag him during all reasonable but'-
upss hours 20 have free access TO tho
records VI the county recorder. Ito
also askod that the court fix bond Of
$1,000, condu 1nvd for the faithful ab.
tTacling oi said records. Granted,
FREE IiCESsr
Mu. T.. G. Bird, a widow, OF Miller
T., o., putiti0ued Tor thtOt.mOuths1
free liCun,o 10 c0nduci q small retail
store az Fourteenth South aud State
streets. Granted,
Fisu COMMISSIONERS BILL.
HCo ny AZ ornoy whiuemore In 70.
pliuul un the claim OF l.. ~. Bntfalt
a. hsh and game CON missioner from
Apul ], 1894 To February 20, 1896, I'd.
yisoi the payment Of tie clam which
has accrued sinco January 1t, 1895,
aud recommended that the payment VI
the bAlaucu be deferred until tbs neues-
-ary legislative authority Is obtained.
ADOPTED.
uNLuCKY FRUIT 1RFE INSPECTOR.
The same official, q whom was 70.
erred the claim OF Fred w. Price Tor
salary rs ifuit tree inspector Tor the
months OF November anu December,
reported adversely on the claim, UV-
ing 10 tbs law under which be was
appointed having been declared uu-
constitutional.
THE FARRELL NIGHTMARE.
The county attorney returned the
claim Of Farrell Il company Tor balance
duo upon an account for labor anu
material alleged to have been furnished
ny the claimants In connection with
Tue oohs,ructiOn Of the Joint city Rud
c'uny building, ana In relation
recommended its rejection, basing the
stand taken on the ruling OF the Su.
pftme court OF the Territory In the
ease OF fenton VS. BAIT Lake county,
aud claiming that under that ruling
The county would not be authorized to
allow tue claim or any part thereof.
lie was OF the opinion that the court
would receive authority from tho Leg
stature to pay the olSim, and
"a he was not Informed as
70 the correctness Of the bill,
lie advised that it, correctness DO at
once determined. Ono item ia the
elaim, however, for discount on war
hnA could not legally be sustained
unuer any circumstances and should
hoI DO taken into coheid Grafton In FIX
ing the amount 10 DO paid ~ the
clalmants.
Judge Mckay 10 speaking to the
attorneys report, did not think the
opinion OF the Supreme court warrant
eu the non'RllOwance OF tno claim. "lt
the claim IL left In suoh "a way" said
me- 'as to give us payment when she
requisite iunds are available, we will be
hats1ed.O
The report was finally referred 10
'ne eelectmen, with instructions 90
ascertain the correctness Of FarfelIB
olalm' which aggregates S,4i3.i1.
THE OOUETY's REvESUR.
On the 9th inst. Clerk Stanton com.
muuloated with the county attorney
iuf an opinion as 10 the amount Of war
!shls TINT could be legally Issued ny
Tue county court for the year 1905. In
.eply thereto the attorney called at
'enllOn 20 the ruling OF the Supreme
,uuft Ia tue Fenton case, wherein they
hsIu that tho indebtedness OF the
county Ia any year could not exceed
'he total iucuming revenue for tho
..,Wo years pToceiing. TIE roveuue tUr
lhe years lS830i amounts 30 1924, l7s,s8
ana the legal Indebtedness VI The
'Nuhly as liked by the supreme court
W 'he case meuti 3nei amounted On
hunfy |, 1895 g S337,7l3.OJ, thus
: Nu"lne a decrease IN tho reveuuei
lIF leOa'Si o. sl3.55020 ae Comparei
"'.i' tun revenues lur tho year, l502'O3
ip mt Tue revenues " tho county Tor
"'H year to the amount Of Sl8,bb82O
."'' hrst BIO applied TO reducing tue
.'hil u the total indebtedness. The
20 n.nunieati1n further staJos!
"4ns oAsu receipts for the year 1896