St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1895-03-05
BATTLE OF GIANTS
Comes to an End in a Decision
by the United States Su-
preme Court.
KNOCKOUT FOR BELL co,
Under the Ruling Three Inn
pOrtant Edison Patents
Terminate.
MANY MILLIONS INVOLVED.
Life Of Scores Of Other Pat
ents Affected by the
Decision.
KNOCKOUT FOR BELL co.
MANY MILLIONS INVOLVED.

l.
ion of the supreme court of the
United States handed down today,
unanimously sustaining the decis-
ion of the lower court in the case of
Bate Refrigerating Company against
SulZberger, is probably more far
reaching in it's influence and affects
a larger amount of property than
any decision of the court since the
"greenback" cases were disposed of.
This decision not only settles the
controversy between the parties di-
rectly interested, viz: The General
Electric company and the American
Bell Telephone company, on the one
side, and the Westinghouse and anti
Bell Telephone company on the other
side, but also disposes of a very
large number of other patents which
the public have assumed to have ex-
pired under the ruling of the lower
court, but which would have been
revived If the decision of the su-
preme court in this case had been
the other way, and it also shortens
the life of a great mcnJ patents
which have not yet actually ex-
pired. The decision is against the
position taken by the General Elec-
tric company and the American Bell
Telephone company, and those asso-
ciated with them upon the appeal,
and affirms the decision previously
rendered by the United States cir
cult court in this circuit. This de-
cision
TERMINATES THREE EDISON
PATENTS
for the carbon transmitter owned
by the American Bell Telephone
company, by which it hoped to ex-
tend it's control for twenty-five years
more, as would have been the case
had the decision below been re-
versed. A considerable number of
very broad patents owned by the
General Electric company are also
disposed of by this decision, includ-
ing Mr.. Edison's patent upon the in
candescent lamp, regarding which
there has been so much litigation.
and also his patent on the multiple
arc system of distribution, and his
cent lamps, which was recently held
to be valid by Judge Coke.
The history of the case of the
Bate Refrigerator company against
Sulzberger is very interesting. The
case involves directly a very small
sum of money, and the complainants
would in all probability have never
thntIcrhf
case to hearing had it not been
that the lawyers of the General
Electric company and the Bell Tele-
phone company discovered that this
case directly involved the point in
which they were so Vitally interested
and would furnish the earliest on
portunity Of bringing it before the
supreme court. The result was that
the complainants soon found them
selves represented in court by such
eminent and expensive counsel as
James Carter, James j. Starrow, of
Boston, counsel for the Bell TeIe-
phone company, and ex-Commission-
er of Patents c. e. Mitchell, of New
York, counsel for the General Elec-
trio company. No sooner had these
eminent counsel put in an appear
ance than the defendant Sulzberger
found himself represented by the
equally eminent counsel retained by
the Westinghouse Electric company
and the anti-Bell interests, incIud-
ing Wheeler H. Peckham, Edmund
Wetmore, Ben H. Bistow, Leonard
Curtis, of New York. From this
time on the battle was
ONE BETWEEN GIANTS.
The question was elahorately ar
gued before the circuit court of ap-
peals for this circunt, Judges Wal
lace, Shipman and Lacombe sitting.
but this court declined to take the
responsibility of deciding the uues-
ton, and certified it up TO the SUI
preme court of the United States.
This court treated the case as one
of so great Importance that it took
the very unusual course of assigning
1t for hearing some three years in
advance of the regular order and
also allowing about the double the
usual time for argument. These
oral arguments were by James C.
Carter and eX-Commissioner of Pat
ents Mitchell for the General Elec-
trio and Bell Telephone interests,
and by Edmund Wetmore and Wheel
er H. Peckham for the Westinghouse
and anti-Bell Telephone interests,
and a large number of briefs were
filed on behalf of various other in
terests affected.
Probably there has been no case
argued before the supreme court
since the war, in the outcome of
which SO many lawyers were inter-
ested.