The San Francisco call. [volume] (San Francisco [Calif.]) 1895-1913, 1895-04-09
LEGAL NorICEs-Continued.

TN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
of California, in and for the City and County of
CHARLES SUTRO, plaintiff, VS.. ALFRED R.
WATSON ct al, defendants Action brought in
CISCO State OF California, and the complaint filed
in said City and County Of San Francisco, in the
office of the Clerk of said Superior Court.
The people OF the State of California send greet
ing to ALFRED R. WATSON, WILLIAM ROE,
PETER DOE, JOHN FIRST, JANE FOE and
MARY COE:
You are hereby required to appear in an action
brought against you by the above-named plaintiff
in the Superior Court of the City and County of
San Francisco, State OF California, and TO answer
the complaint filed therein within ten days (excu-
sve OF the day Of servce after the service on you
OF this summons-if served within this county; or
IL served elsewhere, within thirty days.
The said action is brought to obtain Judgment of
this court for the foreclosure Of certain mortgage
described In the complaint and executed by
the said ALFRED r. WATSON, on the I'd day of
June, 1894, to secure the payment OF certain
promisSory note made by said Watson to plaintiff
said I'd day of June, 1894, for $40 000 described
in the complaint herein, and which, by non-pay
ment of interest has become due, no part of which
said note has been paid, and the whole thereof,
together with interest thereon at the rate Of 10 per
cent per annum from the I'd day of June, 1894, is
due and unpaid also for per cent OF the amount
found due plaintiff, for his counsel fees in this
action; also for the of S107.50 paid for nsur
anee, and 50 paid for searching the title to the
mortgaged premises subsequent TO the execution Of
said mortgage That the premises conveyed by
said mortgage may be sold and the proceeds
tnereoI appned 10 the payment OF the
principal and interest OF said note, moneys
expended oy plalntlm as aforesaid, counsel
fees, and costs OF suit; and in such
proceeds are not sufficient to pay the same,
then that Judgment be docketed against said
ALFRED r. WATSON for the balance re-
manning due, and also that the said defendants
and all persons claiming by, through, or under
them, or either of them, NAV be barred and fore
closed OF all right, title, claim. lien equity OF re-
demption and interest in and to said ortgaged
premises and for other and further relief, as will
more fully appear by reference TO the complaint
file herein. For further particulars reference to
said complaint is hereby made.
And Coll
pear and answer the said complaint, as above re-
quired, said plaintiff VIII apply TO the court for the
relief demanded in the complaint.
Witness my hand and the seal of the Superior
Court OF the City and County of san Francisco
State OF California this I'd day OF March, A. D. 1895
lSeal.l c. f. CURRY, Clerk.
By H. F. MORRIS, Deputy Clerk.
ALFRED SUTRO, Attorney for plaintiff, 10l
Croker building, San Francisco, Cal.
TN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY
l. and County OF san Francisco. State OF Califor-
nia-In the matter.of DUFFEY BROS, insolvent
debtors.
Notice is hereby given to all the creditors OF
GEO. f. DUFFEY and EUGENE J. DUFFEY.
1nsolvent debtors, who have proved their debts
that said G. F. Duffey and Il. J. Duffey have filed in
said Superior Court their petition for discharge
from all their debts and liabilities and that by
order OF said court, all said creditors are required
TO appear before said court, at the courtroom
thereof, Department No 10. in the new City Hail.
in said city and county. on the 30th day of April
~ D. 1895, AT the hour OF 10 "A. NJ. and then and
there show cause if any they have, why the said
GEO. F. DUFFEY and EUGENE J. DUFFEY
should not be discharged from all their debts, in
accordance with the statutes in such cases made
and provided.
Attest my hand and the seal of said court this
25th day of March, 1895. C. F. CURRY, Clerk.
TSEAL.l By VIM A. DEANE, Deputy Clerk.
CHEAPEST AND BEST IN AMERICA-TUE
United States or Canada one year for 81 so, post
age free.