The Evening dispatch. [volume] (Provo, City, Utah) 1891-1895, 1895-02-25
ALIAS

CUMMONS-1N THE DISTRICT COURT OF
y the First Judicial District of the territory
OF Utah, Utah coun.y.
The Anglo American Loan, Mortgage &Agency
Co., Limited, of London, q corporation, plain
tiff. VS.. Thomas +. Earl and Harriet E. Earl.
his wife, The Lombard Investment company
a corporation, and Milton b. Whitney Charles
S. Fairchild, Harry E Mooney. Sanford B.
Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers of The
Lombard Investment company, defendants.
The People of the territory OF Utah send
greeting to Thomas f. Earl and Harriett E.
Earl, his wife, The Lombard Investment COM
pany, a corporation, and Milton b, whitney,
Charles S. Fairchild, Harry E. Mooney, San
ford B. Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers
of The Lombard Investment company, de-
PENDANTS.
You are hereby required to appear in an ac-
ton brought against you by the abOYe named
plaintiff, in the district court OF the First Ju-
dicial district of the territory of Utah, and to
answer the complaint filed therein, within ten
days exclusive of the day of seryice) after the
service on you of this summons-if served
within this county, or if served OUT OF this
county, but in tins district, within twenty
days; otherwise within forty days - or
judgment by default will be taken against
you, according to prayer of this complaint,
The said actlonis brought to obtain d decree
of this court against the defendants herein for
the sum of Sl7U2.70 with interest at IL per
cent per annum, from the 1st day of january
n. d, 1898, until paid and for $4,000 attorney
fees, and for COSTS of SUIT. Plaintiff alleges
that on the 4th day of March. 1880, Thomas f.
and Harriet g, Earl, his wife. executed and
delivered TO The Lombard Investment COM
pany certain bond IN the sum of 81 $685. O.
with per cent. interest per annum, with IL
per cent. after maturity That two of said
coupons have not been paid and that the same
with the principal has been declared due and
payable. That on March 2lst. 1890. the said
Lombard Co sold and assigned the said note
to plai tiff, who is now the lega holder there
Of and did then and there guarantee the pay
ment OF the within note and principal within
two years from said last mention ed date. That
the usual decree may be made for the sale OF
the said premises to pay said debt, interest
costs and attorney fees, that the proceeds of
SAFE may be applied in payment of the amount
due pla1nnH, and that said defendants and
each OF them and all persons claiming under
them or either of them subsequent to the exc
cution of said mortgage upon said premises
either as purchasers, eneum brancers or other
wise, may be barred and foreclosed of all
right, claim, q equity of redemption in said
said plaintiff may have judgment and execu-
tiOn against the said defendants Thomas f
Earl and HARRIET E. Earl and The Lombard
Investment company, for any deficiency
which may remain aTter applying the pro-
ceeds of sale.
For fuller particulars see copy of complaint
on file
And you are hereby notified that if you fail
to appear and answer the said complaint as
above required, the said plaintiff will apply
to the court for the relief therein demanded,
and costs of suit
Witness the Hon. William H King, Judge,
aud the seal of the District court of
the First judicial district in and for
lsEALl the territory of Utah; this 18th day
of February, in the year of ourLord
one thousand eight hundred and
; ninety-fye,
]. W. BEAsLEY. Clerk.
By GEO. HAvERCAMP, Deputy Clerk.
James A, Williams, attorney for plaintiff.