The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1895-04-27
THE couRr RECORD.
Supreme Court.

1885. State ex rel. Magnet VS.. Kemp. Tip
answer is sufficient for a bad complaint. 2.
Until, the township trustee has
and declared a partition fence insufficient
approved March j. 1851. 5 Objections not
P Wiii mot be- an eon nalfa upon npo oS appeal ape slIai court
1885. Wagner VS.. Citizens building and
firmed. As jordan, aJ.-TThis case afirmed upon
the authority of Wohlford VS.. Citizens
Building and Loan Association.
1925. Tolleston Club VS.. State of Indiana.
Lake C. C. Petition for reaearing over
ruled. Howard, III. In the original sur
ions being surveyed and numbered BY the
deputy surveyors, they performed all that
lands being lawfully surveyed in 1884 and
selected, and the selections approved under
quired a good title under the act Of 1850, the
actsof 1870 and resurvey and sale hereunder
was void. 8. A purchaser of land along a
center. OF the stream. 4. A conveyance of
lands bordering upon hats OF river passes
expressly excluded.
1874. Corbin VS.. Thompson. Marshall C.
G. Affirmed. Hackney, 1.-The ehancery
exercised in doubtful cases, but is exer-
cised only where justice would be defeat ted
to appoint a receiver where the question is
OF disputed title to real property, the plant
a defendant in possession. wac is receiving
the rents and profits under a claim of legal
title.
Company. Howard G. G. Rsversed. Nc
cabe, c. il. Under the code the same judge
both legal and equitable jurisdiction. and
administers both legal and equitable relief
p ln sssh warrant saTs Th ht. ! the rh facts sxt Rlsaasi s11d
OF the direct engagement. Of the principal
extinguishes the collateral liability of the
charged by act of law g.. A person is not
bound to resort to a legal remedy if it is
remedy.
1878. Leedy VS. Town of Bourbon. Mar
shall c. c. Affirmed. Lott, IA member
of a fire company which was organized by
an aana act Or ordinance 3r OF an ineorporated
Of this State, is not exempt from work upon
the public streets, as required by law.
G. J--When a man qualities for the per-
sumed to nave done what the statute re-
CURED that he should do.
G. G. Reversed. Davis, J.--Where a person
knows of a defect in a sidewalk it is in
cuInbent upon him to use such care and
ger.
14o4. Kluspies VS.. McKenzie. Clark c. C.
for years expires, and the tenant contin-
ues in possession, in the absence of any con-
tfdct TO the contrary, he becomes q tenant
from year to year, and upon his failure to
pay the rent a notice giving him ten davs'
warning terminates the tenancy.
Superior Court.
Room John L. McMaster, Judge.
Henry I. Noting VS.. George w. Coonse;
sprinkling lien. Dismissed and costs paid.
Thompson's Bank vs.. Guilford f. May
field; restraining order. Granted.
Room 2-L. NJ. Harvey, Judge.
Louis Shaler VS. The ~. &C. & st.
Louis Railroad; suit for damages On trial
by jury.
Room s-Pliny W.. Bartholomew, Judge.
Christina Ray vs.. Elmer Ray: divorce.
Decree granted plaintiff.
Edward Applegate VS.. Stephen McCor-
mick. mechanics lien. Under advisement.
Walter j. Hubbard vs. Mrs. e. H.. Moore;
on note. On trial by court.
New Suits Filed.
Keystone Building and Loan Association
close mortgage. Circuit Court.
Heinrich Lou VS.. The indianapolis Chair
Manufacturing Company; suit for damages.
Superior Court. Room 8.
North-side Savings and Loan Associa-
ton VS.. John A. Long ct al; suit to fore
Harry Fl. Temperly VS.. The Manufacture
ers' Natural-gas Company and Indianapolis
Abattoir Company; suit for damages. SUI
perior Court, Room 1.
Mary Butler VS.. Thomas Butler; petition
to sell real estate. Superior Court, Room 2.
Elmer p. Norris VS.. William P. McCur-
dy; suit on account superior Court,
Room g.
Nataiia Nathan vs.. Lavina Rusk: suit for
possession. Superior Court, Room 2.
Daniel ID. Thompson VS.. Nancy A. Thomp-
son: suit for divorce. Superior Court.
RO0rn