San Antonio daily light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1886-1907, 1895-10-08
NEWS OF THE COURTS.

|
Mary Elizabeth Twohig, by w.
O. Berry, guardian, VS.. r. U. Gull
berson ct ais, partition; John Sc
horn, e. w. Swart and w. f. Ezell
appointed commissioners.
Judgment for plaintiff-Elmen.
dorf q Co. VS.. w. r. and j. l..
Camp, promissory note and fore
closure of lien; Frank J.sBeitel
VS.. E. S. Wilman ct al, promissory
note and foreclosure OF lien |:
, Briscoe 4 Co, vs.. Arkansas Prescott
let al, promissory note; Briscoe
| & Co. vs.. N. Devine ct al.
promisscry notes; w. w. Pin
son vs. W. j. Spillman ct al, prom
issory note; Mrs. Thekls Dohmen,
guardian, VS.. A. J. May ct al,
promissory note; d. d. A. Open
heimer VS.. w. NJ. Marshal, promis-
sorry note.
A case against Andrew Spencer
charged with aggravated assault,
was dismissed.
Joseph Kossub forfeited $500
bond, with Bernard Kossub and
Robert Kossub as sureties.
Walter Elrod, of Kentucky, was
granted license to practice law.
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS.
Motion overruled-McLeary &
Fleming VS.. Orient Insurance conf
pany ct al, from Bexar, motion to
DOstpOne submission.
Motion granted-Alex. p. Camp
bell ct al. vs.. Juan E. Barrera, ct
al, from Bexar, motion for writ Of
certiorari.
Motions submitted-Rock Is.
land Plow Co. VS.. Leonidas G. Hill,
trustee, from Bee, for rehearing;
Thomas Tinsley VS.. James Ander-
son, from Bexar, for rehearing
City Of San Antonio VS.. Thos. Null
laly ct al, from Bexar, for writ OF
certiorari; j. F. Hillard ct al, VS..
Richard johnson, from La Sale,
for leave to file transcript; j. G.
Thompson VS.. s. A. and A. p. Ry
Co., from Bee, for rehearing; Theo.
Wiedenfeld and Fred. Allerkamp
VS.. p. II. Gallagher, from Bexar,
for rehearing.
FORTY-FIFTH DISTRICT COURT.
Sarah M. French, ind. ex., vs.. J.
NJ. Rosborough, promissory note
and foreclosure of lien; dismissed
at plaintiffs cost.
Francis Smith & Co. vs.. Felix
Bessen ct al, promissory note;
judgment by default.
Shafer & Braden, VS.. George w.
Lewis, promissory note; judgment
by default.
Felipe Luna VS.. Galveston Har-
risburg d San Antonio Railway
company, damages; judgment for
defendant.
Alexander Main VS.. Francisco
Ruiz ct AL, on promissory note ;
judgment by default.
Smith, Devine & Co. VS.. r. H.
Russell ct al, on promissory note
Judgment by default as to Hick-
man and continued for service as
to Russell.
j. Viademonte VS.. George Koer-
ner, debt; dismissed at plaintiffs
cost.
Ware Furniture and Manufac-
turing company VS.. O'Connor & Co.,
promissory note; judgment by de-
fault.
f. F. Collins Manufacturing COM
pany VS.. Otto Vogel, promissory
note and foreclosure of lien; iudg-
ment by default.
Judgment for plaintiff was rem
dered in the following cases:
Austin Nicholas & Co. VS.. Sidney
B. Wood, debt.
Raymond & Williams vs.. S. b.
Wood, on account.
Hugo & Schneider VS.. w. NJ. l..
Marshall, debt.
r. G. Bowers Granite Co. VS..
Mierow & Riebe, promissory note.
F. j. Bethel VS.. Camp & Camp,
promissory note and foreclosure OF
lien.
G. Epson vs.. I. n. Snow ct al,
promissory note.
REAL ESTATE TRANSFERS.
Charles Magerstadt to WDhel-
mine Magerstadt, lots 4 and 5,
in block bounded by Newton, San
ia Clara, North and Centre streets !;
S..
Conrad Huberich to Jno. Menck,
lot %, block 2, on Dashiell avenue