The Evening dispatch. [volume] (Provo, City, Utah) 1891-1895, 1895-03-08
ALIAS


| SUMMONS-INT THE DISTRICT COURT OF
| y the First Judicial District of the territory
| OF Utah, Utah coun y.
| The Anglo American Loan, Mortgage &Agency
| Co., Limited, OF London, u corporation, plain
| tiff, vs. Thomas +. Earl and HARRIET E. Earl,
| his wife, The Lombard Investment com pany
| a corporation, and Milton B. Whitney, Charles
5. Fairchiid Harry Mooney, Sanford B..
| Ladd and Frank Aagerman, receivers OF The
| Lombard Investment company. defendants.
| The People OF the territory of Utah send
| greeting to Thomas f. Earl and Harriett E.
Earl, his wife, The Lombard Investment COM
pany, corporation. and Milton B, Whitney,
| Charles s. Fairchild, Harry E. Mooney, San
| ford B. Ladd and Frank Hagerman receivers
| OF The Lombard Investment company, de-
| PENDANTS
You are hereby required to appear in an ac-
| ton brought against you by the above named
plaintiff, In the district court of the First Ju-
| dical district OF the territory of Utah. and to
| answer the complaint filed therein, within ten
days exclusive OF the day of service) alter the
| service on you OF this summOns-if served
within this county; or IL served out of this
| county, but in this district, within twenty
| days; otherwise within forty days = or
| judgment bv default will be taken against
| you, according to prayer of this complaint
The said actionis brought to obtain decree
of this court against the defendants herein for
! the sum of Sl7R.70, with interest at IL per
cent. per annum, from the lst day of January,
A. ID, 1895, until paid, and for $4,000 attorney
fees and for COSTS of suit. Plaintiff alleges
that on the 4th day of March, $780, Thomas f.
and Harriet e, Earl, his wife, executed and
delivered 10 The Lombard Investment COM
pany certain bond in the sum of 81. 900 co.
with per cent interest per annum with II
per cent. after maturity That two of said
coupons have not been paid and that the same
with the principal has been declared due and
>aayable. That on March 2lst, 1890 the said
TAnbard Co sold and assigned the said note
~ 4 ElaihtlH, VINO is now the Ie2a holder there
S S,f - uid then and there guarantee the pay
iot -, an " the within note and principal within
eliS Io Sos from said last mentioU ed date That
mo te i,sTf decree may be made for the sale of
he said 6amises to pay said debt interest, |
,oS,S oI,d a at1HSrney fees, that the proceeds OF
~ 90 InaV be ~ pIled in pay ment of the amount
,'e -,iointIfF and that said defendants and |
secb of them Ssnd all persons claiming under |
hem or either S4e them subsequent to the exc
,ntion of said mortgage upon said premises, |
,ither as purchasers, ,&neumbrancers or other,
wise. may be barred Nnd foreelosed OF az
light claim. or equity of aud thar m the
.aid plaIntiff may have Judgment and execu-
ion against the said defendiants Thomas +;
Earl and Herriett E. Earl andN Inc 5L9 lombard
Investment company, for aiN u9hbeieIcy the ,l0
yh,ch may, remain after applyffs 'n0 pro-
;, IDS of sale. Sor,,,I,;,,.
For fuller particulars see copy of lnpialnt
IN file. No,, foil
n annear and answer the said complaint as
hove required, the said plaintiff VIII uRply
% the court for tne renei therein uenanueV-'
md costs of suit
Wv witness the Hon. william H King, judge,
and the seal of the District court OF
the First Judic' al district in and for
IsEAI1 the territory of Utah; this 10Th day
of February in the year or ourLord
one odsand eig 1t hundred and
nine I've,
J.W, BEAsL ,Cler :.
By GEO. HAYERCAMP, Depdty Clerk,
James 4. williams, attorney for plaintiff.