The Evening dispatch. [volume] (Provo, City, Utah) 1891-1895, 1895-03-02
ALIAS

GDMBTONS-lE THE DISTRICT COUIST DE
10 the First Judicial District of the territory
OF Utah, Utah county.
| The Anglo American Loan, Mortgage &Ageney
Co., Limited, OF London, corporation. plain
| tiH, vs.. Thomas h. Earl and Harriet &, Earl
his wife, The Lombard Investment company
| a corporation, and Milton b. Whitney, Charles
| ). Fairchild, Harry Mooney, Sanford B.,
! Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers OF The
Lombard Investment com pany, defendants
| The People of the territory of Utah send
| greeting to Thomas f. Earl and Harriett E.
| Earl, his wife, The Lombard Investment COM
| pany, q corporation. and Milton Il, Whitney
Charles S. Fairchild Harry E. Mooney, San
| ford B. Ladd and Frank Hagerman receivers
of The Lombard Investment company, dee
! PENDANTS.
You are hereby required to appear in an &C.
| tion brought against you by the aboYe named
plaintiff, IN the district court OF the First ,tIIs
sficia district OF the territory of Utah. and Tu
0nswer the complaint tiled therein, within ten
days exclusive of the day of service) after thu
within this county; or if served ous OF this
county, but in TINS district, within twenty
days; otherwise within forty days - or
judgment bY default will be taken agaiDsG
yous according to prayer OF this complaint
Ihe said actionis brought to obtain a decrgB
of this court against the defendants herein for
the SUM of Sl,7U2.10 with interest at u Der
cent. per annum, from the 1st day OF January
A. u, 1885, until paid, and for $4,000 attorney
fees. and for COSTS of SUIT Plaintiff alleges
that on the 4th dav of March. 1870, Thomas f.
and Harriet E, Earl, his wife. executed and
delivered TO The Lombard Investment COM
pany certain bond IN the sum of 81, ,6O0 90
with per cent. interest per annum, with II
per cent. after maturity That two of said
coupons have not been paid and that the same
with the principal has been declared due and
payable. That on March 2lst, $780, the said
Lombard Co sold and assigned the said notS
to plai- tiff, who is now the lega holder there
of, and did then and there guarantee the pay
ment OF the within note and principal within
two years from said last ment1on ed date. That
the usual decree may be made for the sale OF
the said premises to pay said debt, interest,
costs and attorney fees, that the proceeds or
SAFE may be applied in pay ment of the amount
due plaintiff, and that said defendants and
each of them and all persons claiming under
them or either of them subsequent to the exc
cution of said mortgage upon said premises,
either as purchasers, enoumDrancerS or other
WISE may be barred and fOreclosed of all
right claim, or equity Of redemption in said
premises and every par thereof, and that the
said plaintiff may have Judgment and execu-
ton against the said defendants Thomas F.
Earl and Harriet e. Earl and Abe Lombard
Investment company for any deficie 1cy
which may remain after applying the pro-
ceeds OF sal9s
For fuller parttDuisrs ace copy of. complaint
on file
TO appear and answer the said complaint as
above reuuii ed, the said PLAINTIFF will apply
to the court Tor Lne reuSt tnereln demanded,
and COSTS of suit.
Witness the Hon. william H King, judge,
and the seal of the District court of
the First judicial district in and for
lsRAE1 the territory of Utah; this 18th day
of February, in the year of ourLord
one thousand eight hundred and
ninety-hve,
j, W, BEAsLEY, Clerk.
BY GEO. HAyERoAMP, Deputy Clerk,
James a. Williams, attorney for plaintiff