The morning call. [volume] (San Francisco [Calif.]) 1878-1895, 1895-02-08
at is a question of truth replied Cox

at is question OF truth" replied Cox
warmly.
The chair held that the vote should first be
taken on the Reed substitute to which there
was pending amendment. The Reed substi-
tute provides for an issue of per cent coin
bonds to replenish the gold reserve and the
issue of certificates of Indebtedness to meet the
DEFICIENCIES in the revenues. Bryan's amend
ment added a proylso that nothing in the pro-
posed substitute should be construed as a sur
render by the Government of the right to pay
outstanding coin obligations in gold or silver
at the option of the Government as declared in
the resolution which passed Congress in 1873.
The BRYAN amendment was lost 127 to 1862
and the vote was then taken on the Reed sub
stitute, which was lost, 100 to 1877 The vote
then required on Cobb's amendment to the
Cox substitute. The substitute was practically
the Carlisle currency bill, including a pro-
vision for the repeal of the State bank tax The
vote was practically party vote, save that
Cannon (Pop.) of California, Grain 3D. of North
Dakota, Dayey d. of Louisiana, Geary (D.) of
California, Griffin ID of Michigan, Lawson
fD.) of Georgia, Pendleton 3D. of Texas and
Shell D.) OF south Carolina voted with the Re-
publicans in favor of 1t.
Cobb's amendment amended the existing law
to bear per cent interest, and provided that
nothing in the substitute should be construed
as an authorize ton for bond issue. 1t was
beaten without division, as was the Cox SUBJ
stitute, on rising vote, 55 to 1874.
The vote was then taken on the third reading
and engrossment of the bill itself, which was
defeated on rising vote, 81 to 159 Springer
demanded the ayes and noes and the roll was
called confirming the rejection of the measure.
The vote stood 1874 to 1911 Before the vote
was announced Reed arose and attempted to
10 nj n m IN ~ nf a1f n
many of his colleagues who had voted for the
bill but he got no further than the statement
that he had made proposition to Springer
that seemed TO him fair when he was howled
down by chorus of objections from the Demo-
cratic side. The detailed vote:
Ayes-Adams OF Pennsylvania, Aldrch, Babcock
Baldwin, Barnes Bartlett, Barwg, Beckner, Beltz-
hoover, Berry, Bingham, Boutelle, Brickner, Bro
sius, Bynum, Cadmus, Caminetti, Campbell, Car
nth, Causey, Chiekering, Clancy, Clarke of Ala
bama, Cobb of Missouri, Coffin, Coombs Cooper of
Florida, Cooper of Indiana, Cornish Covert Grain,
Dalzell Daniels, Davey, De Forest, Dingley Draper,
Dunphy, Durborow, English of California, Erd-
man, Everett Fielder, Fletcher, Forman Gardner,
Geary, Gessenhainer, Gillett OF Massachusetts,
Goldzer. German, Gresham, Griffin of Michigan,
Griffin of.W isconsn, Grout, Haines Hale of Min
nesota, Hammond, Harmer, Harrison, Haughen,
Hayes, 81 endricks, Henry, Hicks, Hines Hooker
of New York, Klefer, Kribbs, Lapham, Lefevre,
Lockwood, Lynch, Mahon Marvin of New
York, McAleer, McDannold, McGann, Nc
Kaig, Meyer, Montgomery, Mutchler, o'Neil
OF Massachusetts, O'Neill of Missouri,
Cultivate, Page, Paschal, Patterson, Payne,
Pearson, Pendleton of West Virginia, Pigott,
Powers, Qugg, Randall, Ray, Reed, Reilly, Rey-
burn, Richards of Ohio, Richie Russell of Con-
necticut Ryan, Schermerhorn, Scranton, SickIes,
Sipe Smith, Somers Sorg, Sperry, Stevens, Charles
Stone, Stone of Pennsylvania, Stone of Kentucky,
III.
Turner of Georgia, Turner of Virginia, Turpin,
Updegraf, Van Voorhis of New York. Wadsworth,
Wagner, Warner, Washington, Wells Wilson of
West Virginia, Wise, Wolverton, Woomer, Wright.
Total, 1874.
Noes-Adams Of New York, Aiken, Anderson,
Alexander, Arnold Avery, Baker of Kansas,
Baker OF New Hampshire, Bankhead, Bell of Colo
RADIO, Black of Georgia, Blair, Bland Boatner,
Boen, Bower of North Carolina, Bowers of Cali
fornia, Branch Breckenridge Bretz Broderick,
Bromwell, Broekshire, Brown, Bryan, Bundy,
Cabaniss, Cannon of California, Cannon of Illinois,
Childs Clark of Missouri Cobb OF Alabama, Cock
rell, Coffeen OF Connecticut, Cooper of Wisconsin,
Cousins, Cox, Crawford, Curtis of Kansas, Davis,
De Almond, benson, Dinsmore, Dockery Deliver,
Donovan, Doottle, Ellis of Kentucky, Ellis
of Oregon, Enloe, Epes, Fithian, Fyan, Good
night, Grady, Grosvenor Grow, Hager, Haner,
Hall OF Missouri, Harris Hartman, Hatch, Heard,
Henderson of Illinois, Henderson of Iowa, Hen
derson of North Carolina, Hepburn, Hermann,
Hitt Holman, Hooker of Mississippi, Hopkins of
Illinois, Hopkins of Pennsylvania, Hudson, HUI
lick, Hull, Hunter, Hutcheson Ikert, Isler, John
son OF North Dakota, KEN, Kyle, Lacey, Lane,
Latimer, Lawson, Layton, Lester, Little Livings-
ton, Loud, Loudenslager, Lucas Maddox, Mcguire,
Mallory, Marsh, Marshall, McCleary of Mime
sofa, McCreary of Kentucky, McCulloch, Nc
Dowell, McKeighan, McLauren, McMilln, Nc
Nagny, McRae, Meikleiohn, Mercer, Meredith,
Money, Moore, Morgan, Moses, Neill, Newlands,
Northway, Ogden Pendleton of Texas, Perkins,
Picker, Richardson of Michigan, Richardson of
Tennessee, Robins, Robertson of Louisiana, Rus
sell of Georgia, Sayers Settle, Schel Sbley, Simp-
son, Snodgrass, Springer, Steilings, Stevenson,
Stockdale Strait, Strong Swanson Talbert of South
Carolina Tate, Tawney, Taylor of Indiana, Taylor
OF Tennessee, Terry, Thomas, Tyler Van Voorhis
of Ohio, Walker, Waugh Wheeler of Alabama,
Wheeler of Illinois, White, Whiting, Williams of
Illinois, Wilson OF Ohio, Weodward-Total, 1l6
Present and not voting; Bailey Cd of Texas, Ed
munds CD OF West Virginia, Jones CD of Vir-
ginia and Kilgore CD of Texas.
The following pairs were announced, the first
name would have voted aye and the latter noe
Rainier and Edmunds, Mccall and JONES' Culber-
son and Curtis of New York, Wagner and Hainer
OF Pennsylvania.
Springer then entered motion to recon-
slider the vote by which the third reading
of the DILL was refused, and Hatch CD of
Missouri moved to lay the motion on the
table. The latter motion was carried-135
to 123. This ended the fight, and the VIC
tors made the hall ring with their shouts.