The Evening dispatch. [volume] (Provo, City, Utah) 1891-1895, 1895-02-23
ALIAS

SUMMONS-lN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
y the First Judicial District of the territory
of Utah, Utah county.
The Anglo American Loan. Mortgage &Ageney
Co., Limited, of London, a corporation, plain
tilt, VS.. Thomas E. Earl and Harriet E. Earl
his wife, The Lombard Investment company
corporation, and Milton B. Whitney, Charles
s. Fairchild, Harry E Mooney Sanford B.
Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers of The
Lombard Investment company, defendants.
The People OF the territory Of Utah send
greeting to Thomas f. Earl and HarrietJ E.
Earl, his wife, The Lombard Investment COM
pany, corporation. and Milton B, Whitney,
Charles S. Fairchild, Harry E. Mooney, San
ford B. Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers
of Inc Lombard Investment company. de-
PENDANTS.
You are hereby required to appear in an ac-
ton brought against you by the aboYe named
plaintiff, in the district court of the First Ju-
dicial district of the territory of Utah. and to
answer the complaint filed Unerein within ten
days exclusive of the day of servicel alter the
service on you OF this summons-if served
within this county, or if served out of this
county, but in this district, within twenty
days; otherwise within forty days - or
judgment by default will be taken against
you, according to prayer of this complaint.
The said action is brought to obtain decree
of this court against the defendants herein for
the sum of SI,TOz.70, with interest at IL per
cent, per annum, from Gne 1st day of January
A. d, 1895, until paid, aud for Sl5O.00 attorney
fees. and for costs of suit. PLAINTIFF alleges
that on the 4Ih daY of March, 1890. Thomas f.
and Harriet e, Earl, his wife executed and
delivered TO The Lombard Investment COM
pany a certain bond in the sum of 81 800 60
with per cent interest per annum, with l2
per cent. after majority That two of said
coupons have not been paid and that the same
with the principal has been declared due and
payable. That on March 2lst, 1890 the said
Lombard Co sold aud assigned the said note
to plail tiff, who is now the lega holder there
of, and did then and there guarantee the pay
ment of the within note and principal within
two years from said last mentiOge ed date That
the usual decree may be made for the sale of
the said premises to pay said debt, interest,
costs ana attorney fees, that the proceeds of
SAFE may be applied in pa} ment of the amount
due plaintiff, and that said defendants and
each of them and all persons claiming under
them or either of them subsequent to the exc
cution of said mortgage upon said premises,
either as purchasers, encumbrancers or other
wise, may be barred and foreclosed of all
right, claim, or equity of redemption in said
premises and every par thereof, and that the
said plaintiff may have judgment and execu-
ton against the said defendants Thomas +.
Earl and Harriett E. Earl and The Lombard
lnYesGment company, for any deficiency
which may remain after applying the pro-
ceeds of sale.
For fuller particulars see copy of complaint
on file
And you are hereby notified that if you fail
to appear and answer the said complaint as
above required, the said plaintiff will apply
to the court for the relief therein demanded
and costs of suit
Witness the Hon. William Fl King, judge
and tie seal of the District court of
the First JUDICIAL district in and for
IsEAL the territory of Utah; this 10Th day
of February, in the year of ourLord
oae thousand eight hundred and
nnelT-Ave,
J.W. BEAsLEY. Clerk.
By GEO. HAvERoAhP, De )dty Clerk.
James A. Williams, attorney for plaintiff.