The Wilmington daily Republican. (Wilmington, Del.) 1890-1902, 1895-11-25


The trial lat OF Superior Court cases
was gene over tor the second time in
County Court this morning. There are
cases against the City Hallway COMPANY
which were marked for trlul.
They ole those Of John z. Pierce. John
Jenkins. Clayton j. LIesn. John Wrinbt
ard Charles Yeticr.
A epecioi jury was asked for I'm tho
Wright case.
Continuances were asked for and
granted IN the cases Of j. A, Griffin and
Horace +: Adnms vs. the eUme company.
hoiace Morrali's case was referred to the
counsel fer settlement.
Tho CAGES OF Margaret Donovan. Georga
w. skegga rnd Frank L. GIiswoid we're
marked lcr trial.
The case OF the Hartmann Il Febrenbacb
bieWlng company vs.. The b. a. T. Rail-
roed company was taken OF the list and
continued on agreement Of count al
Judgment for the plaintiff 10 Tho
amount OF 500 was reported Ia the case
-cB.
The cosee OF Ellen N. and Elsie Z. Sat-
5eiiela We. W; u. Crawford were marked
Miles C. Glllein. VS.. Mayor and Coanc He'
William DeyldsoD. We. William Forrest:
Shanobnn d Wrightscn Hardware Corr.
peny, vs.. Wlllltm ID. Stoops; Georre
Maui Maui s.r We; irancis DugaD; Mel.
ehior schlltt'er. vs.. Charles stewart;
John II. Gould vs.. Delaware Imam.
George W. skuggs, VS.. r., ". 4 Il Kali.
Icod oteph Ross. We. Brondywine Gran.
lie Company; New Castle County Mutual
Insurance. Company, Va. City Buiiding
Loan nssoclatlon; Wilmington and
bIaTayWine Bank VS.. Liverpool, London
and G!obe Insurance Company. earnlsb,
eesi same vs. Royal Insurance Company:
O. q. LoEosan Va. II. b. Alexander
" Son. snme We. sG me. John Il. Reed va.
John I. Ianiels aud others. George A
Danlels va Lieblg Manufacturing Com.
pany L. j. McWlorteI va. Jamas II .
Gam. ~
settlements were further Ter oried in
lhe cases OF Maggie Morris We VIM, II.
Johnson. Rebecca Moore VS., W. n. Johnaon.
Jthil Jenkins vs. Wilmington CITY Raiiwav
tohpanyi Humphrey NJ. Moran W. Rob.
in.s INV n ALaiews; 1homrs F. blcHuRh We
hlmetrong; Robt. Reynolds Va Jas q,
Johbeoni Philip Carpenter VS. BnnsIIupeIs,
UefgeI; Matthew 4. Slt u ghter vs. jos. Pyle,
lohlas y; Merritts case against the VII.
,n1nston ADatioir Cold Storage Company
the piantiff being deceased.
MoRAHAN CASE RESUMED.
The tttal Of John Moraban CHARGED with
O'Clock. 80 80
The mother. wife and daughter OF Walls
were seated back of The counsel and paid
different witnessed. '''s
Mofahan's mother and sister occunIed
seats III 'front.' OF tho dock and have been
IN attehuuuce ever since the trial Leptn,
Inc hfht witness called was Arthur
IaiTedY; he testified taGt he resided at
prisoner on the night OF Sent. e5th aiso
saw Walls. wns working at the Ford
| morocco factory. was at tho denot on
he night In question at Poplar street.
when head tome one cry stop that man.
Hneh iste ppea oct and caught Moratai
ara gave him to MIR. Dillon. The prison.
er saiu. Il will 40 along" he saw Mails
at tho hospital room, '0
raymond Davis. testified resides No.
700 spruce direct. Never cav The prisoner
beloie tpe night CT sept. 25th lust saw
him then at tic foot CT POPLAR afrest Ha
was running home some men foiiovIn n
nm wien farrady caught hold of him
and turned him over to MIR. Dillon. Par
rudy caught hold OF him iirst when lien
tCok hold OF hm.
Nloss examination by Walter Hayes
Thought they were railroad men piayIng
wien hEat heard The cry. NS
Joselh dowgate testified that he Ia n
poHee Gllcer. Had no personal ucouaint.
enco Win the prisoner. Down at the p
w. a. D. hallfoad OH the night OF SeuLem,
IL 80, ~ ho9 az betecIlPe JDDes' Office
~ toiu nc on tbO way to the mill ibn /
Maiis haa ordered drinks and refused In
pay lof them. 1t waB told to him in Tho
patrol wagon on his way 10 tie nollce
station. Knew Walls.
Crosse examined by Walter Hayes-Ask
nm II saw MI, Walls. The ATTORNEY GEN.
erai objected. lie court ruled The o,es'
sion ndmissible. Wv deee'
Took Walls to tho Delaware hosn,lal In
patrol wGgon. esp''oi III
L. II
~, III. i. eorkran testified that be was
pfacticlng physician at SEQ West street
Deem ptdGllclng II years; knew Walls 1 ar
years. He died LIST day of Oct Isst ~,
no. 5c0 walnut street. He attended, hi m
during MS sickness. He died from man,
lbsisis' post Inortep examination waa
maue Liter Wail's death. '~'
lie gave technical terms of whnt ,bo
, examination showed WHICH eouaeI ,he
death OF the deceased. 'ne
nound lilo Brain IN congeeted stata
Mnut produced the meningitis?
IL vas ifodrced by a fall. or u blow re.
celvtd on the tack OF tho heau. -
When i hrst attended him Le Nnono,
rational. Examined The head and fonnd
tumor on 1t. l supposed he haI n fran
tufed skull. Tint was the reason he
made the examination. s0A "S
lie attended from 2lsS OF September nm,
died. ""'" III
Tho fracture not necessarily fatal.
Inc attorney General put The question
10 lhe Wltfcss whether or not TINT fruct
ure as you discovered 1t woulI produet
his death. The question was obiected 4,
by tho opposlting counsel.
considerable discussion took plnee
by Inc attorney genela, Tor ills Gdmlsst
biity.
The witness finally answered yes.
The doctor could not form tho opinion
whether or not tho fall produced nucon
seriousness.
Upon the cross examination by AIR
BiRgs the Witness said he 1irst saw tht
prisoner az his home on September ri
Ills condition was such as TO keen him
confined TO his bed.
lilo witness believed the patient at tina
time not to have been entirely Iatlo nal
Mr.. White objected to Mr. Blgrs nsl;ina
the witness whether in his opinion it mad
not been unwise to have taken the Dntien,
II ON The hospital and tho court sustained
his objection.
Mr.. Biggs put his question thus: Had
not Ills removal all Important bearing or
f. Lls condition. ~
Q Mr.. White again objected arguing TO III
a end thai The attorney must confine him
. cell TO tile wound itself Tho ouestioi
Q Of imnrudenee no argued was ilreleyen
: TO the subject matter. Tho court sIla
j. tanned the objection and the question wa
ruled out,
at this point the court recessed
The cases Ct j. Hood Wright We. severn
i, garnishees were stricken from the list Q
! Superior Court.
!. 4he cases of the city vs.. the thirty
ilVe milk denlera who refused TO tako gu
Q license. will DO argued at this term.
: lhe general luFors were DISCHARGED
uutl wednesday morning.