The San Francisco call. [volume] (San Francisco [Calif.]) 1895-1913, 1895-07-09

81 90 'no ~, ~ 80
Mug lor suCh Aiash!loeh' plNlese' ~
substitute nxeS the minimum DID at SZOOO.
1t really should be 5000, but since the City
has hitherto given railroads away, L
thought we might compromise on 5000
but $500 is ridiculous. Now, bespeak Tor
this matter respectful and decent consider
alton, and move that the whole matter be
referred back to the Street committee
both OF these resolutions.
supervisor Hobbs seconded the motion.
There was no apparent disposition to dis
cuss the matter, and the roll was called.
These eight men voted against the substi-
tute; against referring to the Street Com
mlttee; against any further delay:
Joseph King.
Peter A. Scully.
T.. benJamln,
Y e HTabas
Chris bunker.
A. w. Morgenstern.
EDWARD l.. wagner.
These four voted for the substitute,
throwing the matter open to competition,
or for referring it all back to the Street
Committee for further consideration:
Joseph 1. Dimond.
c. L. Taylor.
A. D. Spreckeis'
No" INC queo'!on IetuiAeu upon tiie
auop,loil "a 'ile oi!gIiial olueI granting TIC
i ID W 'ne malAe1-stIee' oUln pany .
Il nus La 'lie AneinOeIS VI Ii!e SUM e1gh'
nau ,io' seen ~ W cay "oi0 III iV0 oendii-
noC oeeinlis IL NECESSARY.
SupSt1tule-ah elaooIately Prepareu oIaer
an thrown away no" rose III eVioeh'
DISGUST slsui 70 IalA 70 Ihe pehuins question:
1nIS ISSUE mas oeen iorceu upon US
MI IIeSIueh'' nc saiu' neIe Is al oluer
Piesei'eu " 10 ny 'ne 0'iee' ooinini''ee'
hot al Vi "ioll are asfeeo " IT. II ap-
pears however 1hat the majority are IN
FAVOR OF haholng over TINS valuaole prlVl-
Iege TO tne oouthern racine company
whose collar TINS Clty ana county mas
worn Tor twenty-five years: personally
have felt the weight OF II, beng threatened
with Its wrath TO the disadvantage OF my
business II l did not do thus and SO as 1t
Wlshed. Inc people are becoming 1retful
under THESE condltons.
NOW, the San Francisco ana oan Mateo
halfway company Is Delhg disseminated
against In favor OF TINS company ana IN
spite or the law against 1t. Inc $oOo Tor
Wnlch IL is proposed 10 sell TINS valuable
1rancnlse Is pltl1ul consideration. L was
really ashamed OF lne szooo nAeo IN my
SUBSTITUTE, puI the vote 'haG mas JUST oeen
taken ndlcates 10 me no" tne tning Is
orii'lng, anu L can olily protesc against IL
anu say tnae [egret II exceedingly. Inc
ooutnern racine company owns all .he
most Valuaole streetcar hnes IN the CITY,
ana Is gong 10 De gwen all the outlets 10
it' !. shouiu oe paying Ols revenue 10
Tue 0'y' Inc Dan ma'eo COMPANY pays
Z per cent ol us gross earnings MARKET
Stiee' EoInpHn P"ys no'nins' No"' ~
SEEMS 'hat 'nu oAiy to@uo 'n@' pay ooine-
'niis ~ 'ne ivy arc ~ po SUI ou' "a cue1-
NESS 'lose 'iias pay nothihe are gwen
every 'HIhe, Aney arc ~ saln oo4n II pie'e
con'roi anu maxi US sui,er IoI II. Anere
eeeH' W NC iio uoPo III U.o peopi9
alI 'tie 20 VIC otieeV
Oom WHEN tney nau InIs ulluer COLI
slderatlon, SAID supervisor wagner, "and
[ heard so much complaint against the
San Mateo road that 7 will ALWAYS vote
- "a
asainoe IL ioi any tii4Ne ~ ""h''' ~ uoh
ANN-1-AA NNS PANA--S
"It is ramshackle concern" said Super
visor Benjamin. ut wanted to get to the
raeetrack through private property. We
don't know whether it could get through
or NOT II is nratty certain the other road
d. $500 a..
ont there don't want II and am onnosed
~ = .,
1T ,, All, +ho4 +bo roo,,;ros +t,o.
ca 49, -, :, 60 -. go
S,na.iaon D;, So ahnd snaoI,;,,s s" -
tad fa;tL g 49, co1,t,,arr poo;6o has e..
- 49, - ~ Tron,;sos = nil no nona ~
.be -o ~ " 80 SO tbi $3.50 Ci+rn wa ~ --0"' "
M ell u,as nroeted with b,rs+ 80
.Io1,.o ~, A.. $1,000 1ohhr, 80 o,oJ
Ia,p Than +hs W. rota ,raS tal,an ard +hsso
aiah+ sr~err;sors yotod 70 bond over tho
saiand;d frsnohiss ~ tha MarLot.s traat
PaiIwav Comnanv v;tbont contest ar con.