New-York tribune., 1895-02-27

D.,
Mr. Vest expressed his sympathy with the views
Of Mr. Berry-but suggested that the House appro-
priation Of $4,000 should be accepted lie mehtio"en
his personal experience in visiting COLORADO seVeIa
years ago when II still Territory lie hau
seen canyon after canyon there absolutely denuded
Of timber by the operations OF great luihDer Co"'
pany.
After further discussion By Senators can 'Dem'
Fla Pettigrew lsep.. s. d and Villas (Dem'
Ws) the committee amendment reducing the
amount for protection against timber depredat'ohs
from $4,000 to $4,000 agreed te-yeas 80 nays
q. *
The committee amendment increasing the appro-
priatlon for surveys and resurveys OF public lands
from $4,000 TO 100000 having been taken up MT.
Dubois Qsep. Idaho) moved 70 make the amount
$4,000
After some discussion Mr.. Dubols's amendment
was agreed to.
Mr.. FRYE Uep Me) offered. amendment 10
MACE ON the retired list officers Of the Revenue Ma
rine Service spoke briefly in favor. OF 1t ana read
a letter from the Secretary Of the Treasury ap-
Mr.. Cockren Dem Mo- expressed his asonisnr snr
ment that Mr. Carlisle would approve plan 10, Ioi
ss sb ad The he sss Of
mitted TO the Senate and the anen1ne & md IL was
II provides for board of three surgeons OF the
Marine Hospital Service 10 examine ana report on
ali Officers OF the Revenue Cutter Service ana .nose ne
who are ncapacitated from active service are 10 De
placed waiting orders out 'ol the iiic u P'0
MIR. Blackburn Dem. Ky.l, member OF the Com m
payment OF the Sugar bounty of two cents , pound no
Sugars between 30 and So 1t appropriaes se5 2ss
for the sugar produced ana on & Mh when 0 the Wilson
Act went into effect. and s5CoOoo beng s-IV 1Sos
mound on all sugars produced between August. 1894
and June 1895. testing not less than 81 degrees py
in advocacy OF the claim of the beet root sugar
growers under contract with t9e Cover nnlent; os
simply an attempt to collect,a debt due and owing
As to the second part o III II in no be W
He thought 1t should go to the extent OIL the pay
ment Of the full bounty. o,o,.,,., dosr
and had read telegram received by him from
bankers, mercantile firms manufacturing concerns s
adoption OF the amendment granting portion OF
the bounty The 6r say Ses tna' Wers sag
creditors to the sugar producers in a large amount
in the policy and laws Of the United states md they
ask for the adoption of the amendment IN ofuer 10
save the sugar growers and others from cohhei'a'
Mr. Mills Dem. Texas made a, point Of order
against the amendment general legislation n on
An appropriation bill and Mr. Brice ODem, Ohio)
said that if Ar. Mills had not made the point he
Mr. White CDem Cali said that every sanction
of the bill negatived the point of order; -, o.sor
to the Senate and the Senate voted that the amend
men! M4 Msu4n IN 9rdsT e s is paST STsd against the
amendment unconstitutional appropriation Oh
'es sis puRS P4Scop %GneR sRep araea h favor of As
sugar bounty amendment. He ridiculed the consit
;On iSs rsaCs s It Of Mr. car #
for individuals to pay their honest debts 1na,: ne
S pnbs a TS a uss Sns
no5 em ID the hope that
the sugar bounty amendment would not be aaoptesa ps
It was his firm conviction, after the most careful
and patient investigation for the last Two or % nt
law Din view of the evolution that had taken place
most nas Unfortunate position. He believed that with
the sSes sber sd by Se SHe beet usa Industry
the cane sugar ministry to i've in.t his coptT fSe
s d iG"5S mot Ssye Ss tss4s aa se e sas f
higher grades such as cut loaf 6 ihS So1 r, s
HontinSsa Sss.ysar. 20 Ne ressestsd that
industry should be lest IN 9 Wcb fVqhh he
a. ne xss to e. shsF
ana in TINS year 1894 Is, theySad produssf million
tons than an the ay ws IN
" Ss n,sd %lshn Safes Traction OF the cost OF
10 could doubt when the lasts & were ,,rIs,, ps
ssssa sna Of the he paid
DAY and had been Paid Sg f05 hs as5 nnes w0 hr
nrovision were made for the current expenses OF
he Government by issuing other evidences OF debt
there was NOT enough aSa by % to meet the
rent Of the fiscal year % hst 9eng aTsns rnf
putting the sugar bounty provision on an appro-
Mr.. Hill Dem. ~ Y)-The only question that
occurs to me. after the remarks Of the Senator
amendment is not as appropriate to this bill as
Is an amendment proposing 10 supply dehclehcy
In the revenue or 10 regulate the method OF Is
Mr.. Wolcot Gep. COLI moved TO amend the
arsasurT TO purchase 100000 ounces Of silver
month for the period Of eight months at the & mar r.
time into silver dollars 'in furtherance OF CON
tract heretofore enered into h tdoe the % fe
United States He argued that. If there was
the n1D a G e
the West that they undertook a he inning MIN beI pr
gold freely and purchase their silver at its mar
ket price. There could be no argument applying
s9uaily ally to E,Ti' the producers Of silver.
The amendment was excluded on point o,
thai II was in order were Messrs Bate Brce,
Cameron Clark Hansbrough, McLaurn, Mantle
Mills, Peffer, Pettigrew' Teller "aish ana "o'-
Mitchell oTe} mOysd Dsdvso TO a%snd sSs thepe ths
shall be paid to the sheep owners OF the United
be Of %SS nem fS y
an amount equal to cents per pound on an AL, 90
nestle WSS e m @ the an
support OF his amendment 1t was decideo out oi
Mr. Pettgrew Rep, s; D. opposed the sugar @
bounty amendment on the ground that n tne sen, en-
ators from Louisiana had voted TO abolish me
bounty by voting for the Tariff bin. and that to
grant their people bounty, now would be TO put
NJ Hoar (Rep.' Mass). in furtherance Of the
same idea moved to stss out OF the nssncb he
said the Senators from louisiana voted sor the
the people o Of the United states were acquitted
obgson to u ne o pe0s o them l %od haye
defeated that measure. One OF them Nlr Banch-
ard had voted against X and had' & % on fIiI s de