Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1895-02-20


After SOME further discussion tho
court directed that the matter stand
over uuui J3m.rrUw morning.
TUE oUAsp LAUoESY cuAu0E.
Next conversation ensuoI 10 10 the
taking uuof the grand larceny charge
against Mrs. MulvAuuy and Valentine,
both MI stephens and MI IuU
strongly Insisting that tho trial tufiu
at once; but Dutfict Attorney Judd
did MOI favor the ruggostiun. lle
thought Tho other matter should nr
foitlud mt.
Eventually Judge Bartch FsiI the
case might no pr0croicd wiih, auJ 30
st 1880 tho ompuuClinE Of jury boz.
gan, and In lrTB than q quarter ~ an
hour the twelve had been secured.
Then the CLERK read the indl tnnut,
which charges the defendants with
having stOiel, on DocuuUtrl, 1879, at
she county Of salt Lake, biE $1,000
billie; $4,000 in bills the denomination
Of the same being unknown 20
the grand Jury; one g0Iu WD,cu
valued gt 500; one EBnps scarf
uiui pearl urd diamonds, valued %
sou; one 3.csnt diamond inner raH,
value t75l, ali vac property uf Thomas
L. iulvllUy
DUuc. Attorney Judd uuEt asked
that nu adjournment b1 taken tiIi
?. M, TO enable him % talk with tho
WI Icssgs Tor tue pfO CCuli4n. ho bad
hal no opportunity ~ DO t0 before,
AMI did not know that thit case W. .I.8
bD tf'li today.
M. 5lUphuHs-T 70 only one
j H..H
va.ry.
JuIEU Judd Lave otherp.
Mr Stephens uC5Iod 90 hav0 notice
% VINO they were; but Judge Judd
pfamIiiy replied that 40 WAC NOS tI-
us..d 8. thHt.
"On, yef, nrc," climod 10 Al.3f.
Ley john VI Iaug.
ibru Judge IulI saii ne w0uli like
10 see lhr .ssl.e uu tao lI a.; 90
which NJ" u ,IO replied that rule
ll lH.a matter was Older than any
statute,
's it % old ne y1u ars?" a.sod
Juiso JDiI rl6casucllIy- thuro
Wha general laugh, wliuh tue Court
raped down.
ME- Zane got IN his answer never.
thc.ts. "lt .H, my dcnr Hr," be-
rJoinri, nud continued In tone 1i
whitening scJTn-''hs old gH you af0,"
AZ The aac3nd burt N laughter arose
JulEr Bar,ch raIloi upon tuo balm
% 1illuru clufi till o'clock.
Valentine and MI Zane then Joined
Mr. ani ME-. Mulynucy, aud the quar-.
icitu indulgoa lu a pleasant conycg-a.
llnni which was ruisly brlEUu by
Nalen'lne's return in custody 90 the
U, 3. Marshall quarters.
ABOUT Im MARRIAGE
"CaIl Thomas J.. Mulvanoy, said
Judge Judd iu deep ba.s voice when
court L. lssemU .el this a,t0rlUu;whufu
upon Attorney NarIAB Jumped 900 aud
asked mat the witness IL sworn ola his
uor dr5 10 answer uB " bis com.
potUuUy, though not ON the main ca-e.
Judge JudI - Wei, until 1 have
oekui him some u Ics,1ns she guulio.
man has no rgAt 20 bugiu by taking
my wilpoha away from ne (LAugh.
teri
Mr. VARIANT NIX The gsntlsman's
pardon. Ny purpose o. 10 develop the
state Of sinc,a which goes 90 hiB right 10
be sworn 81 ail.
Judge Bartch directed that the
witness be sworn. This was done anu
the un.ouso went 20 the WicIyots.
Mt. Nariau asked tho witness n he
wai tho husband VI sagio Mulyauoy
anI no nnawoTpd 81 am"
Again Judge Judd complained that
lao iiI not care 90 have his witness
taken from him IN advance; anu
another bubble onsurl.
ST. Nariau presently said he was
WILLING 10 let Judge Judd 20 ahead,
aud tue witness was ,hcu turned over
20 tuU distriGt attorney.
Nulyanuy (vh0 utym4l doubtful a.
10 whom hu "url1nguV"l said Ia an
awvr 90 JulgD Judd taat us hAd lived
lu ,his c.ly aiuco THANKSGIVING Day,
aud ca4s hero f.m puilluelphia,
l,9ppln. on On route. no wa8 mnf-
riOd 10 Sagls on or about June II, 1893,
90 GravesuHJ, Long Island, but bal
not the marriage certificate with him.
Ihe uefUm0ny was erlUrmel by q
but no did not know his nAmo
uuT % what church no belonged,
"Hou never saw him bul0re2"
"No.n
"Aui have never seen him aincb?"
"Ng.D
"You DO not know f.r u fact that he
WA a Clergymnr2"
SONY from what no ghido
Judge Judd insisted tAAl under the
rovisud laws Of New York there was
no proof Of marriage here, ana counsel
luetsd from haid statutes IN support Of
.nls.
10 Mr. Vatlan-Wo went through
a form OF marriage, believing tho peT- |
sou who married Us 10 br minister. |
My wife had the certificate OF mar
rlage auu we lived together from the |
lime OF the marriage until recently
MI Narian said the persecution had |
Treated Mt. Nulvaney Es man anu wife |
All through these criminal proceedings. |
Both no anu Attorney Stephens Argued |
against tue proposition Of tue district
Attorney.
Judge Judd said no was simply |
'trying TO got down 90 lawful mar. |
'iage;" because II the parties were
not legally married, then Aful. |
yaney was competent witness. |
No marriage had yet been proved.
lie understood that counsel present |
lad the certificate; le. the defense pro.
luce Il.
Mr.. 5iophens srgued 70 would be la
possible Ia nineiy.nine cases out Of a
lundrod Tor a witness 20 testify that
ne minister who married him or ner |
vas lawfully ordained 10 that Ccole. |
.lastloal oillcu, or, " a Judge or justice .
u the leace, whether he Lad been |
egally commissioned ~ ruuh.
70 the court, Mr. Mu,vauey said the |
lerson who married them represented
d d H.|I Ia la.