New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1895-01-27

pealed Germany would remove the restriction:
our and an ho n1s faith
TO be reserved only for foreign na!ons ''i let US
are thinking of what ,b,n !, que due H to louisiana
state. bone Of your bone esh Of you, hesh' ~, a
Of our great and s 6 osan% had spent
y2OOWOo0 OH the crop OF 1894. and tina, ios',s arr ar
s sDeh' that II the pending bill Congress
should increase the existing GUY ., ~ do II in
"A his ACT s, s an increase would also add $500
900 to slecooo year TO the is bs 70 eave the
sugar planters and beetsugar growers IN as goou
a position as they were left by the act u "os'''
NJ tIan,rrr ,Rep. Iowa. presented the following
amendment: 49, l..
Provided that tax on Tonnage OF pef , vessel
"yssn IN %epls Sr IN at the
6 Gn!FG 10 i'.' VESSEL Of a such
Judgment OF the President, make reS or which
urohibits or unfairly mpedes the entrance or sale
q any isot n S saes and the President
y his proclamation. determine 10 "ha' 'esse's '"e
terms OF this proviso apples
GREsriAM's FACILITY FOR LAUNDERING
Mr.. Price Dem. La followed his colleague in
a brief speech, and was In turn Followed by MT
pavn. fRep. ~ " who made the first speech
On the Republican side. He said that as early as
Oc,ober 1. last the Secretary of state. with that
peculiar facility with which he responded to any
suegcston that detrimental 10 tne interests
~ The American people. wrote to the PRESIDENT
regarding the German protest. SAYING mat IN, ,ne
npositlon OF the differentia duty was VOCATION
OF The favored-nati clause he seemed 10 nav
round precedent. said Mr. Payne IN the matter
~, itnportation OF rice from the west coast OF
Africa and from America under the customs ACT OF
William ~ QSS6). The Attorney-Generai now
ever did not agree with the secretary oi o'a'e III
his Interpretation OF the clause t.,
Mr. Payne said he hoped the TINE had not yet
come when the American Congress WAS 70 De
frightened into taking clause out OF Tariff law
by the accusation that II was u, regar
obligations. He reviewed analogous Iesar1-
Ing other articles oil commerce, csp-ciay WIN ref
erence to Canadian lumber, when 10 Government
bad claimed 10 be a violation OF treaty obligations.
But II yield to the German -,ihvAs.auo Or, ~
this demand said he. we must Yield to Great
Britain and Canada IN the matter . Di 'ahddian
lumber. Ii is the entering wedge me German
Ambassador Is just 80 sure mat tne imposition OF
duty on salt imported from countries that levy
duty upon that article Is as mucn .io,hoh Oh IN,
a pound diYerental duty. Are We 10 nave aho,ner
popgun bill taking that legislation out OF the VIII
son bill? We are told In advocacy OF the OH that
OF Germany and result In opening The ports OF
that country our cattle. Where Is me warrant
for that assumption? Germany says she vas no,
retaliatory reason. | know that II is favoriie
belief of the chairman OF the committee that Ger
discriminating duty to induce her to admit our
cattle she would say so. why doesn't the President
Investigate and find out whether or not our meat
inspection law IS being properly ana honesty exc,
the result Is. and II that result Is srch as TO war
rant IT, demand that Germany, shall admit our
cattle. using the club we already nave placed IN
his hands to compel favorable action in case she
refuses
Mr. Warner Dem. n. Y) was the last speaker
OF the day. He advocated the passage OF me bill.
Louisiana At the conclusion OF Mr.. Warmers re-
marks the committee rose.