The Evening dispatch. [volume] (Provo, City, Utah) 1891-1895, 1895-03-12
ALIAS


SUMMONS-1N Tt.E DISTRICT COURT OF
- the First Judicial District of the territory
OF Utah, u taE couuy.
The Anglo American Loan, Mortgage &Ageney
Co., Limited, OF London, a corporation, plain
tiff vs. Thomas K. Earl and Harriet E. Earl,
his wife, The Lombard Investment company
corporation, and Milton b. Whitney, Charles
). Eairchild, Harry Mooney, Sanford B.
Laid and Frank Hagerman, receivers of The
Lombard Investment company, defendants.
The People of the territory OF Utah send
greeiIng to Thomas f. Earl ana Harrlet5 E.
Earl, his wife, The Lombard Investment COM
pany, corporation. and Milton Ii, Whitney,
Charles S. Fairehild, Harry E. Mooney, San
ford b. Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers
of The Lombard Investment company, de-
PENDANTS.
You are hereby required to appear in an ac-
ton brought against you by the aboYe named
plaintiff, i'll the district court OF the First Ju-
dicial district of the territory of Utah, and TO
answer the complaint filed therein, within ten
days exclusive OF the day of service) after the
service on you OF this summons-if served
within tlIs county; or If served GUS OF this
county, bub in this district, within twenty
days; otherwise within forty days - or
Judgment Dy default will be taken against
you, according to prayer of this complaint.
The said aetionis brought TO obtain a decree
of this court against the defendants herein for
the sum of Sl.7UZ.1O with interest at IL per
cent. per annum, troCn the LIST day of January,
a. ID, 1888, until paid, and for Sl50.O0 attorney
fees. and for COS is OF suit. Plaintiff alleges
that ON the 4th daY of March, lSyU, Thomas f.
and Harriett e. Earl, ms wite. executed and
delivered TO The Lombard Investment COM
pany certain bond in the sum of 81, $40 OO,
with per cent. interest per annum, with IL
per cent. after maturity That two of said
coupons have not been paid and that the same
with the principal has Oeen declared due and
payable. That on March 2lst, 1890. the said
Lombard Co sod and assigned the said note
to plaiLtitf, who is now the lega holder there
of, and did then and there guarantee the pay
ment of the within note and principal within
two years from said last nentIOj ed date. That
the usual decree may be made for the sale OF
the said premises 10 pay said DEBT, interest,
COSTS ana attorney fees, that the proceeds Of
SAFE may be applied IL pas menl OF the amount
due plainutf, and thai said defendants and
each of them ana all persons Claiming under
them or either OF them subsequent to the exc
cutiOn OF Salu mortgage upon said premises,
either as purcuasecs, encumUrancerso or other
wise, may be barred and foreclOSed of all
right, claim, or equity of redemption in said
premises and every par thereof, and that the
said plaintiff may have Judgment and execu-
Earl and HgrrleJJ E. Earl and The Lombard
Investment company, for any deficiency
which may remain after applying the pro-
ceeds OF sale.
For fuller particulars see copy of complaint
on file.
And you are hereby notified that if you fail
to appear and answer the said complaint as
above required, the said plaintiff will apply
to the court for the RELIEF therein demanded,
and COSTS of suit
Witness the Hon. William Fl King, judge,
and the seal of the District court of
the First judicial district in and for
IsEALl the territory OF Utah; this 10Th day
OF February, in the year of our Lord
one thousand eight hundred and
ninety-tive,
j. W, BEAsLEY, Clerk.
By GEO. HAvERCAMP, Deputy Clerk.
James A. Williams, attorney for plaintiff.