The Black Hills union. [volume] (Rapid City, Pennington County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1889-1904, 1895-06-28
BRYAN AT MEMPHIS
HE HAULs Mr.. CARLISLE OVER.
THE GOALS.
They Arc Both Good Democrats and
Helped Elect Mr. Cleveland for the
Party's Sake, You Know-What will
Bryan Do?

Bryan Do?
The next day after Mr.. Carlisle made
a speech at Memphis the free-silver
democrats held a meeting which was
addressed by Congressman Bryan, of
Nebraska. Among other things Mr..
Bryan said:
II have read the speech delivered by
MIR. Carlisle in this city On yesterday;
also that delivered by him at Coving-
ton, KY, last Monday evening, and I
have compared them with the speech
delivered by him on the 21st of Febru-
airy, 1878, in the house of representa-
tives, and l am reminded of the Ian
suage used by David in lamenting the
death of Saul: How are the mighty fall
lem!
"In 1873 Mr.. Carlisle was hurting the
pebbles of truth at the giant of the
Philistines-John Sherman. Today, as
a Goliath, he daily issues challenges to
his former friends. His speech of 1878
was made when he was 43 years old, in
the full possession of his physical
strength and mental vigor. He had
then been a practicing lawyer for 20
years, a member of the state legislature
of Kentucky and lieutenant governor
OF that state, and was then a member Of
congress. Mr.. Carlisle did not refer at
Memphis 20 his speech Of 1878, but he
did refer to it at Covington, and said:
Some of the opinions then eX-
pressed have been modified, and some
of them have been changed altogether
by subsequent events and by a moro
thorough Investigation of the subjects
to which they related, but on the ques-
ton of free coinage my convictions
have never been shaken for a moment
But he did not state, even at Cow
ington, what parts of his former speech
he ~repudiated and what parts he mod
flied. He served in the house and sen
ate for about fifteen years after th=
making of that speech, and never upon
a single occasion did he attempt to
withdraw the utterances Of 1878 or to
modify the emphasis with which he
then spoke. He explained that ne vot-
ed for free coinage in 1878 in the hope
that it would be amended in the SEN
ate, but he never voted against free
coinage until after the nomination of
MI. Clevland in 1892. 1t is true that in
1878 MI. Carlisle did say that he OPP
posed the free coinage of silver, but
he ought, in all fairness, to have stated
that he was at that time opposed to
the free coinage of gold also. He said
IN his speech of 1878:
Compromise Measures.
ct am opposed to free coinage of
either gold or silver, but in favor of
the unlimited coinage of both metals
upon terms of exact equality
mot only is his present language
contradicted by his former speech, but
6 letter written in 1890 by him says
that he was at that time in favor Of
the free and unlimited coinage of sill
yer.
"Mr. Carlisle, in 1878, said: The
struggle now going on cannot cease,
and ought not to cease, until all the
Industrial interests of the country are
fully and finally emancipated from the
heartless domination of sy%ndicates,
stock exchanges, and other great COM
binations OF money grabbers in this
country and Europe Now Mi. Car
Isle is the honored guest at the con-
vention attended by bankers and fnan-
ciers who are opposed to the use Of
silver as standard money.
MI. Carlisle asks why the advocates
of bimetallism are not in favor of the
restoration of silver gradually. What
mockery this is! Did not we secure the
passage of the seigniorage bill just aft
er repeal of the Sherman law, and did
not Mr.. Carlisle's chief, Mr.. Cleveland,
veto this bill, Notwithstanding the fact
that it was voted for by more than two
thirds OF the democrats of both houses?
Did not the advocates of bimetallism in
the senate offer to support a bill pro-
vid1ng for the unlimited coinage of sill
yer, without the p%rovocation that the
government should charge a seignior-
age equal to the difference between the
bullion and coinage values? Did not
the opponents of silver oppose this
measure as violently as they did the
free coinage of silver?
I'm 1873, when Mr.. Carlisle was in
sympathy with the masses of the peo-
pie, he said: Let us, if we can do no
better, pass bill after bill, embodying
In each some one substantial provision
for relief, and send them to the execu-
tive for his approval. If he withholds
his signature and we are unable to Sc