The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1895-08-29
F. A. Thayer, Solicitor.)
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.

Moses Wensel, ct al. VS.. William Haun, ct al;
No. 70S Equity. In the Circuit Court for Gar
rett County.
The object of this suit is to procure sale OF
the real estate of John Haun, late of Garrett
county, deceased,
The Bill of Complaint alleges that the said
John Haun departed this life about the 18th
day of March, 1892, seized and possessed Of
certain real estate in said county as shown
by Exhibit A., leaving surviving him as his
only representatives and heirs at law the
following persons, tO-wit: Jane Haun his
widow, who has since departed this life to-
wit, on the 10Th day of April, 1884, Valinda B.
Haun, who intermarried with Moses Wensel;
Sarah r. Haun, who tntermarried with Geo.
with George w. Poland, George Haun, Will
lam Haun. Thomas j. Haun, Isaiah Haun
and w. Scott Haun, his children.
That said John Haun now deceased was in
debted unto the plaintiff, Moses Wensel, in A
very large sum of money, Tor money loaned,
for labor performed and materials provided
for money paid for the said John Haun by the
said Moses Wensel, at his request, and for
services rendered to the said decedent by said
Moses Wensel and family for the period of
about twenty years during which time the
said decedent and his wife resided with Moses
Wensel upon the said real estate described in
the said Exhibit A.; the said Jane Haun, wife
of said John Haun being an invalid and con-
fined to her bed the greater portion of her
time requiring the constant attention Of the
said Moses Wensel and family in caring for
nursing, maintaining and providing for the
and Jane Haun, his wife.
That while living on said real estate and
caring for said decedent and his wife, the
plaintiff, Moses Wensel at great expense to
himself made many valuable Improvements
upon said real estate, far exceeding the rem
tai value of the same for said period OF twenty
years.
That said John Ham, deceased. left no per-
Sonal property of any character upon which
administration could be had or out of which
said claims could be paid, and that the plain
titiS are advised tnat they are eNtitled to have
said real estate sold under a decree of this
court, the claims of the various creditors paid
out of the proceeds of said sale, and the bal
ance, if any, distributed amongst the persons
entitled thereto according 10 their respective
interests therein.
The Bill then prays for a decree for sale of
said real estate and proceeds distributed as
aforesaid and for writ of subpoena against
resident defendants and an order OF pubca-
ton against resident defendants as fol
lows: George Haun, whose residence to your
plaintiffs is unknown; Thomas j. Haun and
/ w. Scott Haun, who reside in the State of
! Pen ylvania.
1t is thereupon ordered this It'll day of Au-
| gust, A. d. 1895, by the Circuit Court for Gar
rett county in eqnity, that the plaintiffs cause
! a copy of this order, together with the object
| aud substance OF the Bill to be inserted in
some newspaper published in Garrett county
| once week for four successive weeks before
the It'll day of September next; giving notice
to the said George Haun, Thomas j. Haun
ana W. Scott Haun and warning them to APP
pear in pei son or by solicitor in this court on
or before the Esd day of September neat to
| show cause, if any they have, why decree
shall not pass as prayed.
A. HUNTER BOYD.
True copy, Test
f. u. TOWER, Clerk.