Reporter and farmer. [volume] (Webster, Day County, Dakota [S.D.]) 188?-1946, 1895-02-28
THE HAYWARD TRIAL
EHE MCRDERER 0Y CATHEgrsE
CLING on TMIAI
Twowrsxs @f the ~c=sESzasc1 Mrr1-r
Gas~ M MfmmexpsaAS-The D~f~nse
Prs&1re~ Witnesses An sgFy~rs of
sk~ ThHr6 Man Th~~ry-

M&6A&[E2 y GrNA8E W. @&EA &GMI%T
As tie s~seSogrxpA@r cs B1txTs xrfs-Bey
~hg0 w&s - testify that Bl1Vr hs5
STATED 10 his 1rrs-neT sz har pr.s@nee
f&zt II was with Aary Harvard sn5
mot wsgh Harry that Re hsd eaz~zar=s
&C. rZm~se~ Miss G-z r. erezr, lad
he39 fzzt * zzE = c1--u-5cz-ssn IT,
tween EIE1t and z-tq-1HT. s21 wzs,
r&@TNEgs@- Ea&-EEs T1e-s bad
been the Er~Biext &1zs-est zExEE1ss
nx91Sg &w-ers gP-erzly. and Mr.. E--
win tAs r3g-1srx racSar@6 2 ~ts3@Erar2
VI. u Py9x4@- ar Dko2C-6 Miss.
citing three decisions - - TIE g.of1-
%G@ 0DE- wEs T-wSI&-g 20 sG2E- lie
testimony with0Er Tia direct consent
81 EsEx- ard z1a -Erzeyer WIS
Evw1gEt from ms fan x-5 QaHxS01A3
psrgcaaIgv by Judge S-i-A He Lad
no oA5ec13ga~ be said. and HisS W1ch-
tEr EEs caleb II rhez 5eTesgoe3 that
She was SIX and could 1ot l. present
to-day The s8sden change q frg--
On 1he part of the state f. safd 20 b.
Gne 20 its ability 70 iZr@acA Mss
Wzehte-g evf6Fnce sb&oauiesy. B9txIs
1+to-aey viii 70 On the stand and CO..
tr11irt tx @z3 il liz Also Understood
that the stz-e has aSceTraiasd from .
Nrz6d1nt Of Miss wzeh-e- the true
evidence q the eTf6erc@
Thomas Waterman Was called 20
testify II 20 Harry HsywardE 0T
rnentS On Dee g. The dzT q TIE uur-
der He ~cc1rrad5ct1-d gdry Hayward
On several important particulars as ID
G-e Three boarders 1T Harry Hay
wards boarding house testified that
he YVES In he dining room rs late Is
S.W that ere7lnx. which brings him
dangerously close TO thu tine when
E1ve-TIzl Wilson claims 10 hare seen
hin driving with Miss GLng. half q
mile away. The defense expects 70
eTrzSGaxh 4 complete zlIbi for the de-
fendast from ! until 1870 ?. IL th=
day o. tAs murder.
Adry Implicated
Later Miss wzchtar appeared and
gave her testimony. 80 whSch she said
that BliI- Era his first confession, i'm
pEiczsed Adry.
Minneapolis FEB. 21-Edward Gold
Eafl the Chicago dental student w.s
put on the stand when the Hayward
ETxrder trial opened for his redirect
examination He testified that be had
usually been Harry H4ywArd's com
pznion when be came 70 Chicago 10
gamble. and that be had seen him kSe
ms much - $1,000 ~ q time. He us1-
ally had pseay Of money and for this
reason GOS1sell was EOt surprised 10
see him with 5000 when there in
November. Asked OF crosxexan'1a~
ton IL he had ever seen Hary lose
ut - Jackson street Chicago. be said
40. IL was AZ a wabash avenue resort
chat be lost
Frank Erhardt who was summoned
by hts brJiher when the body was
found, gavt evidence which seemed 10
inpeach the svfaenne OF Bttxt In q
particular. He Ew0re tAAt De had
found In the dirt near where the body
Iay q heel mark and then 3 toe mark
Of a lzdysg shoe. There was also the
trace Of where the foot had dragged
Co where the body lay. This evidence
went TO show that Miss Gingg body
was pushed out Of the buggy feet FIRST
fngsead Of head first. ~ the murderer
testified. OF coCrse this would over
fhrow the theory that the fracture Of
the skull and the confusion were
caused by tie fall from the buggy. and
would help 10 iupezcA the testimony
OF BiExt
George GrfndaH Was an important
witness for the defense. He was
standing On First avenue north, be-
fEeea Fourth and Fifth streets ~ Z
O'Clock OK therAzhCEE N Dee. 3. ,
might Of the murder. Grindau had an
apDosnrrrent with a young woman NJ
the point named. and was waiting
there for her. Sanding a short -zy
frD-n him vas : l7n. like that man
there said the witness. pointing to
ArtCrney Sweetser. GriadafI saw Miss
Cling drive mp. The -a7 hs had See1
waiting there entesed the buggy with
Eer ard they drove away. This point
Us absat q block from the West hotel
whence Miss Cling started o. her fate
full ride. The description given by
Grfndzll OF the ma who Joined her
does not AT ali NJ Harry Hayward
There Was
A wsrdy Quarre
between the lawyers over GrindaIs
testimony. The state had shown in
the crosse. animation that the witness
character vas not above reprOach. and
then I'm the redirect examination Mr..
Erwin attempted 10 show that the wit
4ess h.d been bounded and prosecuted
by the police 10 get him To change his
testimony. These questions were steal
ely ruled U By the court as improper.
and finally the court found IL necessary
60 reprove Mr. Erwin for his persistent
attempts TO get the matter before the
jury.
"If the court ~pleases," said Erwin Ia
q high key, II want TO show the meth
DDS that have been used by persons on
the other side OF manufacturing aud
supervising evidence"
Turning 10 County Attorney Sye.
he said: I'm going 10 hunt you out
and 20 through this thing"
Nye half-roSe In his chair. his face
az, white as aShes. and glared ut the
tan attorney for the defense.
"IIi follow you" ne Kissed. 'to the
ends Of the earth. Don't talk 70 me Of
manufacturing evidence III show
who has been manufacturing evidence
IN this cas-"
81 hope you viii" shouted Erwin,
and Judge Smith was forced TO inter
rupt the ~colloquy, the participants In
which had assumed very threatening
attitudes. But the Questions were
vigorously excluded GrindaIfs evil
dcnce was somewhat shaken In the
crossexamination-
The elusive third mar" whom the