The Jasper weekly courier. [volume] (Jasper, Ind.) 1858-1922, 1895-04-26

state, and Herman Eckert. Clerk
lhe docket was called and larg,
number Of State cases, in which III,
parties charged with offenses are moi
residents OF Dubois county, wcr,
continued. The first case ready 70,
trial was the Huntingburg attraction
OF trail, but not very fair females
and the court room was filled with
young men from the Burg. with a
sprinkling OF women, all anxious 10
hear the unsavory evidence. A
plea OF not guilty was entered a
jury called, and the trial occupied
the balance of the day, the Jury 60
ing out just before supper and ar
irving at verdict in about two
hours. The following shows the
disposition of causes up to We'd
nesday night.
State vs.. Sarah Kays, Lucy Cato,
Ellen King, keeping house of III
fame; jury trial; verdict guilty
with fine of $40 each.
State VS.. Fred Brown; contemp,
OF court; fined $50 and sent to iail
60 days.
State VS.. John Went; burglary of
Rev. ). Cox's smoke house in JEFF
ferson township jury trial; verdict
Z years in States prison.
State VS.. Heber Hargrave; petit
larceny; defendant being at large
under suspended sentence, and hay-
ing further violated the law, evil
ience OF which was heard, he WIS
sentenced to be committed 10 the
Indiana Reform School for bows
Until ne is II years Of age, to-wit:
Sov. II, 1901.
State VS.. John Alvey; selling lio-
Tor on Sunday; jury trial; verdict
I not guilty.
State VS.. John Bunk, ct al.
ouse breaking; nollied.
CIVIL ACTIONS.
Mat. Refs, Admr. est. Of John
els; dismissed as to the real estate
unsold.
VIM. $. Bissey, admr. Of est. #
lmes w. Farris. reports sale Of
nd tor 81 ,O66.7O to Christian
,hnarr; sale confirmed and deed
dered. !
scrllda Sutton VS.. Philip Sutton: :
vorce; dismissed. ,
John j. Geisler VS.. John a
rodel, ct al. judgment for $53 .95 =
Dora Soper VS.. Ed. +. Kellams
al. Judgment for Sol So.
Philip billy VS.. Geo. II. Raab Of
dismissed.
John klee, ct al. vs.. Chas. Miller. <
igment for $500, attached pro.
rty ordered sold. ~
Louis seng, Jr vs.. n. Haskins !,
al. judgment for 1925. 81. !
Milwaukee Harvester Co. VS.. Geo elec
IIbster, ct al. judgment for hol'
w. - first
elizabeth Bellner vs.. Theo. Eek ror
n; dismissed as compromised ot fi
'erh. J. Schipp vs.. Caty Barth o.
Oh
os. A. Sonderman VS.. Henry ~ ~
hkoetter; judgment for 500 SO towI
erd. Schneider VS.. Ed. Rever- Or
I; judgment for $126.s3. town
!enry Witcher VS.. Jos. F. Lorev ~
l.; judgment for SIS. 80. IN ~
go. Heitz vs.. Frick- Bische Co. -
,ment for s225.SO sea
liza +. Willis vs.. VIM. +. An. -.
on, ct al; judgment for ''f'
..oV- Apr.
hitman Crowder vs.. Vim. NJ ~.
rs, ct al; judgment for ~
10. Not
I'm }. Schulten, ct al. VS.. VIM s Wrs
Harris; judgment for $l44 40 and
I'm J Giles vs.. Vim. NJ. Har- final
Judgment for $500. the ss
las. j. Hubbard, ct al. vs.. VIM an, ana 9 9
,oonley, ct al. judgment for ali all pc,
30. pear j
!. J. Kempf vs.. d. F. Miller. there
nent for 1915. snail
IN Huebner VS.. n. Haskins Mn
Judgment for $526.5O. Apr
mes b. Payne vs.. John d
., ct al. judgment for$252 H.
.. W. Engle;t vs.. Elizabeth u
r, ct al. foreclosure decree S
1920. .
W. Dufendach ". J. M m
1game; dismissed
IS. Philipy VS.. Elias S. Terry 0eS! r.
Iued. X
on uh vs.. Elmer 4. Small =
dismissed.
'hen A. Scarlet vs.. Samuel
Z; dismissed -
'llne Henninger, ct al. par -
commissioner reports sale Of a.
state to John A. vogler for 4.
ash; sale confirmed and deed -
q. NE