Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1895-09-16
IS HALF COMPLETED.
Hearing Of Daisnso IN the Kelsey
Case Postponed.
v,RiAN MUST 60 70 WYOMING
To Eugeg, In q Case There This week.
lleHce the Continuance
Now.

occupied the bmc IN tue Ihifd uil.
ifici court tbia forenoon, and At tie
close OF The plnilun's case coatlnu.
= noo was alien lill Monday next.
The cfott-eSaniiuaiiouloi ,.he plaintiff
Saturday Afternoon developed nothing
new In tho tcstlmoby. There was M
N,trinpt to Oh " thai size had other
lovers beside Kelley. This morning
tho eamo llpu oI questioning was iol-
lowcl. She was asked II she bnd
Ennwn J. NJ. Noigon In this city In
1899, and had gone cut riding with
him. BE said sac knew him, tut did
uu; go cat with HIM. .he knuw alex.
Miller, o. Denver, having met him VI
his sNttthtaTt's noutc. She had never
CO. responded witb aim. Had got nnto
from him once. lie never addressed
her iu cndsarinr ttTms. bno fhowcd
tue note 10 Mr.. kollcy. 10 waa enclosed
In letter from Sit. MilleT's sweet
heart, who was a dear friend VI the
llainuii She never hnsw Nc.
reocomD, lawyer. She received q
plsio. a. ptcsent from MT. \ cley.
Sit. Stelry said n size could enuOt and
hit certain mark che could nave the
pistol. Shu bod ald hi. tle rafE, anu
received the pistol therefor. sac never
cnffoHp pended with Air. Seeioy. When
"a this city she lot the WaikoT house
fire. cheaper boarding house, because
che dii not have the MONEY, Gnd Mr..
kelsey said no could not pay her biIls
a. tue Walker, a. they were too higb.
Tue plaintiff was shown letter to MF.
Kelsey, which she said shs did not
think she wrote. She said she never
know the Windsor hotel, named IN
the letter. She did not believe the letter
was here. She rent two or three notes
10 MI. kelsey while ehv was ii tho
Walker. thu may have told him Ia
one that she was going 10 move. She
never consulted Mr. Rogers OF any
other lawyer In Denver, about her
cnse. She had consulted Mr.. Bald.
win, IN Salt Lake, In 1892. sne was
In Sall Lake IN 1880, 1892 anu 1894.
In 1899 and 1893 she received many
letters from defendaui. Could not say
whether no addressed her a. his wife.
She wrote TO him as her husband,
signing heftelt sometimes, "Your Low.
lug wife, Badio,." lilo had sent her
kilograms NJ hrs. Kelsey. Bhe had
only retained the ons produced 10
court.
several letters were handed TO the
plaintiff, with tbs inquiry ~ To
whether she wrote them. some she
femsmberod having written, but some
sbc I'D not remember.
Witness, continuing, said she had
no doubt but she was kelssy's vile
until ho told her Ia Denver, that she
was not his wife. She did not remem.
Der the date when Mt. kelsey 90 told
her.
- .aG. ...g.t ..lsu... l..h. 49,.
and wept coplousiy. After time the
severe crOss.examinAtion was con-
tlnusd, more lcttera being shown to
her, which che SAID she did not Iomem-
Der writing, but did net deny. She
said she might have written than.
She wrote him many letters.
During this proceeding, when the
plaintiff was weeping, aud looking
over letters, the defendant was looking
at other lettvIs, ana laughing about
| their contents ne he was ounvefsing.
Witness said she sent Mf. Kelsey
many kilograms, aud signed them with
her maiden name. Tnis was because
OF the request Of Mr. kelsey TO keep
| tho marriage secret. lie sent dtaita 10
horin hog maiden name. When she
| lived with him In Maniton she could
l uUL NtaAlAt WV was lsA III WIZ ANs
though when she Eat down aud
thought Of II, after what he had said,
she had DOUBTS OF a.. From July,
1880, TO August, 1891, kelsey
| wrote 10 her once or twiqs a wecl,. Emo
| had written hnd telegTapheu 10 him
| for money, and he sont Il 10 her. Re-
turning 10 aDotasr branch OF tho sub
| Isci, wilursl said her sister hal
/ a al AfuHaN...
as a busine1s name. IL was not het
real many. Her husband, from WHOM
she was tepsistsd, was named
| Peterson.
On rp-dire examination, the plain.
| tn said all she did from 1855 until
| Kelley left her, was under kelsey,
| \ Ishes And instructions. HE did n,
he desired her up 10 the timo VI the
separation.
After tho plaintifl was excused, Mr.
| Varian stated that no nad ~ appoint
mont TO 20 10 Wyoming, aud had al
ranged 10 go with tho other council
Hut now kelsey obiscted. MIR
VarlAn had received call .or him q
come ~ Wyoming. Ho therefore
asked continuance OF the court I'll
next Monday. IL Mi. NarlAn had
| gone yNhktluay Aho csao W0HiH hhNe
been continued.
Col. Ellis. OF counsel for defendant,
said he had no personal obi alton, hui
his Gent raised n serious objection "a
the further pTolongaIicn OF tho case,
Thora Vas In lived vat amount oil
properly TlgLf, which caused . feel
ing OF unrest. AFT. kelsey was there
fots placed at q disadvantRge In u bur.
iness sonse, and wanted tho case TO &c
on,
Mr.. VarlAn said that 20 far NJ the
propeity interest was concerned, thai
was not Affected by this nearing, mol
would 1. bu by poa,ponemont, fol
when the state was lstituted, tht
question OF dover rights would ne set
ned aud dover done away with. Ii
any EVEN, this pOstponement coulC
mi affect Mr.. kelssy's property. Il
was merely a matter Of convenience,
and cOutlgsy 10 Mr.. ViriAn as an AttOr
ney, Mr. VaTiau was engaged In q
criminal case, and would not hAy,
accepted the engagement, but for the
consent gwen that ho could 40.
Judge Merritt said no did not thi II
| Mr.. Vanal's request was unreasonable
anu granted IL, tnr case going over I'll
Monday next. Tho parties then left
tho court room, tho defendant carrying
big bundl, oi papers, thu lsltsrs re'
ceiYed w him fem the plain1in since
1855.