Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1895-06-10
The SUPREME COURT.
Arguments in Three Cases al TodayS
Session.
WIN. n. Bramsi. OF wyoming, Admit
ted 90 Practice nj
the BRr.

Judges Merritt, Bartch aud king
occupied the bench at t'iay's session
Of the Supreme Court. Ga motion u
T.. l.. Williams Attorney WIN. II.
Brampl, Of Wyoming, was admitted TO
practice at tho bar.
TIE case of Joseph Goddard, apre'.
lnnt VI T.. n. Parsons It was placed
on tho calendar for this term.
The nnto,se argued 10 the supreme
Court today was that O. u. T.. fancy
plaintiff aud tespouIcnt Va John
Sharp 81 vi, executors, defendants AMI
appellnis. THO case 10 appealed from
tho Fourth dif.rlci.
several wears ago Tafpey brought an
action In tjeclment sgaiust the Drscfnt
Salt company TO recover certain lands
nj monument Point, near the north
end OF Sal. Lake. A verdict ani
judgment IN that case was hal TT
plsiutiii, appeal was taken 10 thu ST.
pfume Cluf. Of the Territory aud the
Judgment affirmed. From that Julg-
inrut the ease was takon Nv wiz Of
error o. the supreme Count NJ the
United Slitfs, anu that court affirmed
the jud imcnt In favor u Tarpey. lyon
fuiI X out tur writ OF eff1fasupstsedra
iOud Ia tue usual io.m was
given by the Desert salt cDmp'ny,
with iona Sharp, now uurolstu, aud
Ge,fgo Y.Wallicu q sure iHstnrto1u,
uudaf which tho respondent snH knUt
out o. the possession ui 1hIl premises
from March 10, ISIS, uutil July l, lsD2,
a la a.. a..
rhis action was Therefore brought ~
respondent ~ recover damages Tor the
use anu occupation Of Fsid premises
iufiug the time be was ~ kept out ui
posses ioa by yiItls OF the said writ
" error anu supetsodeis bond. Ia the
curt below plaintiff recovered iujg.
rneut tor s.. OUn dsmages, anI sl72 In
trt,tt anu 5000 costs. Appellants
risim that there was no evidence to
Justify or support the verdict, and tlnt
the nndlBg u the jury w'- tho result
Of passion of prejudice, AMI not the
result Oi testimony even tending 10
show that nny profit Whatever
uf the land, ~ that IA plsitt n
was damaged In any way whgtsyyL
FoR REMOVING a nDDY.
The mex, casp argunI aud submitted
wa. that Of Franz l.. rnirkiuii, plaiI.
tiT and respondent, W. M0untiiu
View Cemetery association, deionuant
AMI appellant This was an action
bfought In tho Fourth district c1utt o
obtain judgment tor $1,000 Tor tree.
PASS. Paint II claimed lhat de ftndaut
wiliully entered upon certain GENE.
terry lot aud duf up ana removed
tbefeifOm the remains Of PLAINTIFF
sOu, AM Inferred tucm Ia q stfa 70
place. Defendant denied That the
plaintlii was tbs owner Of tuat loi.
The Jury rendered u verdict for plain-
IN tn thesum Of 81 100 damages, The
appellant claims that the c0ur. erred In
the instructions 20 thO jury, aud
appeals tom the decision Oi tue lower
court.
DAMAGE SUIT.
The case Of Philip Cook, plrinuil
and respondent, VI Bullion Beck huJ
Champion Mining oJmpany, defend.
ant aud appellant, was alec argue
and submitted. The aOiion was brought
by plaintii Ia tue First dlstric, court
Tor damages IN tho sum VI sl5, 900 aud
$3.50 paid for medicine hnd medical al-
tendance, Tor injuries sustained by
reason VI the negligence Of the dcfeud-
ant 10 constructing plank walk Ia
certain slOpc. o. the trial OF tue case
In the lower court tHu Jury rendered
verdict In favor " tho defendant Tor
5000. Au appeal was taken on the
ground that the evidence IL intuillcieut
to JuSIify the verdict.