The Norfolk Virginian. [volume] (Norfolk, Va.) 186?-189?, 1895-09-29
IN THE CITY'S COURTS
A Lengthy Docket Disposed of in the Court
Of Law and ChanCery.
MINOR CASES IN THE POLICE COURT.
Information Of Interest To Lawyers
nmd People Gcncrniiy-FIned on
Five Separate Charges Old stories
OF Sin ana Sunshine Told by The
Nir.ininm's Reporters.

In the Court of Law and Chanccry
yesterday the following Judgments
ana discussions entered at rules. not
having been set aside became final on
this dag:
y. Brinkley & Co. VS.. L. Hogshire.
in assumpsit. Judgment in favor of
plaintiffs for s4I2.lo, with interest and
costs.
ole. in debt. Judgment In favor of the
plaintiff for SS5l.2S with Interest and
costs.
~. x II. Myers vs. J f. Jones. in as
suinpsit. Judgment in favor Of the plain
tin for S3Si.2l with interest and costs.
BurruSS, Son u Co. vs. c. L.. Watson
in debt, Judgment in favor of the plain
tin FOR $500 with interest and costs
The Imperial Guano co. vs.. w T. a.
= j. Saunders, in assumpsit Judgment
In favor OF the plaintin for 500 with
interest and costs.
William Henderson vs. Howard a.
odcnd hall. In assumpsit. Judgment In
favor OF plaintiff Tor $3S2 GG with inter
est and costs
G. {. Barclay VS. J. G. league. in
debt, Judgment in favor of the plaintiff
Tor SllO with interest and costs
{. III. Gordon * Co. VS.. Fred b. ste
Nens. In asumpsit Judgment in favor Of
the piaintins for $336.97 with interest
and costs.
L. Wildt vs.. Annie NJ Gates, in as
plaintiff for $iGGl7 with interest and
costs.
Kate l.. Morris, administrators on the
estate OF Charles S. Morris. deceased.
VS.. james Il. Camp. in debt. Judgment
IN favor OF the Dlaintifr for $3.50 with in
tereSt ana cost
Maryland Fcrtilizing and Manufac-
turing Company vs.. the Standard
Guano Company of Virginia. IN debt.
judgement in favor of the plaintiffs for
SS53.O' with interest and costs.
Robert Austrian vs.. Fred Il. Stevens.
in assnmps!t, Judgment in favor OF the
plaintim for SiOI25 with interest ana
costs. y:
Jacobs Bros. VS.. Leon SalzberE. in as
sumpsit. Judgment in favor Of the plain
TINS FOR Sll225 with interest and costs
jacobs BrOS. W. Isaac Legam in AS
sumpsit, Judgment i'm favor of the plain
TINS for S2i6.SS with interest ana costs.
The I1echt- Hirschcr Company of Viz
Sinla ". Fred b. Stevens in uasumnsit.
Judgment in favor of the plaintiffs
for SiIl.6 with interest and costs
city National Bank OF Norfolk VS.. L.
III. Shields and Barton Myers in as
SumpSit. Judgment in favor of the plain
tiiIs for SS5iOi with interest and costs
Homestead waived.
f.. W. Face x Son W.. Lawrence \.
l.hthrop. in debt, Judgment in favor of
the plaintiffs for $lil.25 with interest
and costs.
II. L. Doughty X co. vs.. Howard &
Odend hall, I'm assumpsit Judgment in
favor of the plnin,in for $l@6.7o with
Interest and costs.
T.. y. Watkins x Bros. VS.. u. T..
smith ana George w. Gordon, in debt
Judgment in favor OF the plaintiffs for
sluO with interest and costs. Home
stead waived
William Dcmuth & Co. of New Jersey,
Va. l.. hoffman a. Son. in asSumpSit
judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for
S2ll .0I with interests and costs
IN" following cases were dismissed:
Harry sale VI. City of Norfolk: c. r.
MeSakin vs.. Pauline Grant; j. Il. Jones
vs.. +. /. Edwards. George ON Palmer
vs. Marcus Marx; l.. r. Strawhand vs.
Hamburg Bremen Fire Insurance Co;
y. Gordon VS. j. Malino
The court approved the bill OF John
l. burke. amount $24. FOR services at
tending court twelve DAYS during the
September term. 1895
The will OF Robbins Rattcll. deceased.
was Yesterday admitted to probate in
the Court of Law and Chancery.
TlloS. KNIGHT VS. VA. PEANUT co
In I'll" suit of J. Knight Thomas VS.
Virginia Peanut Associations In as
Sumpsit ON an attachment, an amended
declaration was filed by the plaintiffs
counsel to which the defendants couu-
sci demurrcd. The demurrer was over
ruled. The defendants counsel then
moved the court to strike out the two
laSt Items in the plaintiffs bill of par
ticularS, which motion being argued. II
Is ordered that the item of $50 in the
Sald bill of particulars be stricken out
G. l.. CARR vs. JIANNETTE HOFHEI
In the suit of c. l.. Carr vs.. Jeanette
Hoiheim"r. in assumpSii. judgment en-
tered at rules set aside ON motion of de
lcndants counsel. who pleaded mon
aSsumpSit"
IN" last Will and testament of James
H. Cairow. deceased. was duly proved
IN court yesterday, and on motion of
w m q. Ashley, executor. who was duly
sworn and bonded in the sum of 500
with T.. T.. Guy as surety. Il certificate
granted Mr.. Ashley for obtaining a pro-
bat" OF the said will i'm due form and
order entered that \. w Petit. Vim
l'oSSon. :. l.. Moore. GcOrgc W. Dcv
ana 7. Il. Anderson. or any three of
them being first duly sworn, do Justly
hriraisc the personal estate of tn, de-
ceased and report according 10 law.
me court then adjourned until the
first day of the next term.
SUITS ENTERED.
III the Court of Law and Chancery.
Peter G Warwick, Jr.. vs. the Norfolk
street Railroad Company. damages
SaVp. T. w. Shelton, T.. Il.
Charles G.. kricl VS.. II Clay Pickett
damages $50. Borland X Wilcox y. q.
John l." Smithmeycr vs. Hampton
Roads Hotel Company, damages $li, 800
james y. Goodc y Il.
Poiicc Court Docket.