The Scranton tribune. [volume] (Scranton, Pa.) 1891-1910, 1895-11-26
DECEMBER ARGUMENT LIST.
Order In Which the Cases Arc Set Dowr
for a Hearing.

for a Hearing.
Deputy Prothonotary Myron Kasson
yesterday completed the arrangement
of the cases to be argued at the De-
cember term of court, the week begin
ming Monday, Dec 16. Some of the i'm
portant cases that will come up are
thpse of Attorney I. H. Burns against
Attorney Cornelius Smith. rule to strike
off appeal and rule to strike off award.
down for argument is as follows:
Monday. December 10.
/. Berliner Bros. VS.. A. Corcoran; rule for
2. L. C. Smith VS.. Ringold Depuy; rule to
open judgment.
3. M. A. McCarty VS.. Martin scanlon; rule
4. NJ. A. McCarty VS.. Martin S%canlon; rule
stoSopen Judgment.
8. Charles Robinson, sheriff, vs., ]. b.
Eesh; rule to open Judgment:
to report of referee.
Z. Jermyn borough VS.. N. Depew; excep-
lions to finding Of court.
8. r. r. Hurley vs.. D.. Il II. Canal Co.;
exceptions to nswer
0. In re: lunacy of John J. Peck; rule to
supersede proceedings.
10. p. j.. Regan VS.. John ]. Mcdonnell;
rule for decree.
II. A.. l., Spencer VS.. james Mora. ct al;
rule for new trial.
Il. JsW. sisco. ct al. vs.. J. 8. Miller; rule
for new trial.
land: rule for new trial.
IA. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania VS..
Arigoni F~erdinando: rule to reduce
10. G. +. Maxfeld VS.. F. W. Mason s. Co.;
exceptions to report OF referee.
16. Harrison Bros, rs. ]. D.. William &
!, Bro exceptions TO report Of referee.
III James Flynn vs.. Peoples Live Stock
= ~ 81 MI ~ falra ne nanutif
IS, y. McGouldric C vs.. Peoples Live Stock
" Co; rule to take Off nonsuit.
~. IN re: assessment for Firth W dls-
l. trich; rule to strike off lien as to Am
h 1brose Mulley nj n. Fitch.
%. Central Egs Co. vs.. Alderman Bros;
rule for new trial.
n. Ira r. Barber VS.. Scranton Glass Co.;
a. u Gilmore ( Duffs vs.. H.. W. cOyle; rule
2ss Ambross Muliey VS.. G.. H. Shoemaker;
rule for new trial.
"a. jIn're; grading of New York street; or
der for vie wers fees.
25. John w. Cure, ct. al. vs.. William G..
Miller; rule for new trial
l. Tuesday. Dccember ~.
%. Joseph Fendrick VS.. Mike Basulgia
- rule to open judgment.
q. In re: assignment Of the Walter Print
Ing Co.; rule to show cause why order
should not be revoked.
2s. Bfxler & ConteH VS.. j. b. Lesh; rule
to open judgment.
90. Rees Davis W, Celia Davis; rule for
80. r. David VS.. John David; rule for de-
cree in divorce. .u'''
81. Lizzie Raisley VS.. f. d. Morgan; ex-
ceptions to ~re-taxation:
certiorari.
80. James Tovey VS., Ann Tovey; rule for
decree in divorce.
9. In re: %attachment Of g. NJ Kelley.
az Nprphnnfg q Mocha nirQ' hank We Jnhn
Hosie; exceptions to affidavit of de-
90. John J. Morgan VS.. NJ. Morgan; rule
for decree In divorce.
81. John A. Walker VS.. c. A. Bradley; rule
to open Judgment.
3S. James Wolfe VS.. ]. H. Kays; rule to
open judgment.
ough Council of Olyphant; exceptions
to auditors report
40. In re: appeal Of Dickson City borough;
exceptions to auditors report.
Al. p. Jubuski VS.. T. Jubuski; rule for de-
cree In divorce.
AZ. Thomas Quinn VS.. w. H. Schultz;
certiorari.
4a. N. A. Hubert vs.. watkin Jones; rule
to open judgment.
"A. W. ii. Whyte VS.. Adon Cramer; rule
to open Judgment.
As. Ira Fl. Burns VS.. Cornelius Smi tn rule
to set aside appeal and rule to set
aside award.
NCuucSuuy, DcccuDcT 10.
46. NJ. .Gehrens VS.. Frederick Cramer;
certiorari.
Al. James McDade, jr, VS.. James comis-
4S. George NJ. Schmidt VS.. Bernard Bubel;
certiorari.
40. D. & H.: Canal Co. VS.. Robert Ward;
certiOrari,
50. E. NJ. Daniels VS.. r. E. Daniels; rule
for decree In divorce.
81. Leah Powell VS.. Mary Owens; rule to
revoke order.
81. Fred Mako VS.. e. l.. Fuller; rule for
judgment.
So. Catherine Hicks. ct. al, VS.. George c.
Griswold; rule to reconvey.
"a. Dime Deposit and Discount bank VS..
G.. Smith; rule for judgment.
IS. John A. Gearhart vs.. c. w. Gearhart;
rule for decree In divorce.
56. Fannie Little VS.. N. b. Little; rule for
security for costs.
81. United Security Life Insurance Co. VS..
Sarah ID. Lee; rule for Judgment.
IS. Charles H. Welles VS.. Laura Frothing-
ham; rule to stay a.. f..
50. In re: adoption Of Anthony Seeser.
81. d. W. Vaughan VS.! l.. p Williams;
rule to open Judgment. =
81. James q. Cleveland VI. Safety Invest
ment & Loan Co.; case stated.
turing Co.; rule for Judgment.
"a. G. d.. Dimmick VS.. Wyoming Manufac-
turing Co.; rule for Judgment. =.
s.. J. Weller. ct. al, VS.. Wyoming Manu-
&C. Bridget Atkinson VS.. C~arbondaie Trac-
ton Co.; rule to amend.
G.. s. Rotschild & Bro. VS.. George w.
owens; rule for judgment.
6s. Carrie F.. Lammoreaux VS.; Clarence
Lamoreaux: rule for decree In divorce.
50. r. A. Zimmerman VS.. Pardon T. Bar
Der; rule for new trial.
70. j. A. Van Buskirk VS.. William Edgin-