The Wilmington daily Republican., 1895-05-07
sufERioR AND 6RIMisAL COURTS
The Former Arranxes n Trial List and In
the latter Prise ncrs are Arraisned.

-
the latter Prise ners are Arrnigned.
The May term OF Superior Court was
opened yesterday afternoon and tho first
business transacted was the going over of
the trial list to arrange calendar. The
cases listed number about l50 and the oaI-
enuar Will be composed OF AT least seventy
cases W hich will carry this term OF Court
over to August.
These are the cases marked for trial;
James Dutton VS.. the r., W. u Il. Railroad
Company; John W Burrls ys. Charles L.
Barrett; Charles Warner vs. j. Frank Cur
ryi Thomas j. Day VS.. Jessup 4 Moore
Pa per Company; Charles NJ Banks vs.,
George Nj. Alleurn; jesse Il. Talley VS..
City Building and Loan Association;
Mutual Lilo Insurance Company VS..
George 2. MARSHALL; Daniel Patton vs.
John Mnlvena; G. W. Airey VS.. jackson d.
Sharp Company; Alfred Hard vs. Farm.
era Mutual Insurance Co., Auna Mayser
VS.. b. q P. r. r. Co.; Union National
Bank vs.. a, d. Warner. garnlehee; same
ys. L. 4. Warner and Chas. Warner; Ma.
tlonal Bank of Delaware VS.. A. ID. Warn or,
Chas Warner and l.. L. Warner " r.
Seward vs. Mary @, Carr; Joseph S. NJ or
rlson vs.. John McElwee; q. ". Hally VS.,
Diamond tate iron Co.; j, Frank Curry
vs., Chas. Warner; Chas. s. Horn vs.. Geo.
h. Dearborn; Vincent y. Hill VS.. James
Grimm; Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. vs.
Peter Mccall; Mary Il. Rodgers VS.. Il,
Blumenlhal and Company; Jacob ", Stay.
ton va same; w. G. Locbar vs.. Whining ION
City Railway Company; Miles T.. Gillen
VS.. Mayor and Council; Daniel McCarty
VS., same; Mechanics Loan Associate on vs.
Daniel MoCu5ker. same Va same; " illiam
Davidson vs.. William Forrest; Sha nuahan
and Wright Hardware Company VS..
X. X. Armstrong; Albert Hendle vs..
Hugo Gleh Ter; John NJ. Stuart vs..
Mayor and Council; Mary 0Neil vs. B. a.
I. Il. X. Co; D. NJ. Osborne IL Co. vs. Paul
Gillis, replevin; q. U. Peveriey vs, W. S.
Letherberry; Maggie Moore VS.. William
L. Johnson; Rebecca Moore We. same;
Philena Z. Mousley vs. Anna Presun's
administrator; L. ID. Moore We. Diamond
State Iron Company; George Maull ys.
Francis Dughni Charles Reynolls vs. Will
Jonkins VS.. same; Melchior Schlttler
VS.. Charles Stewart; q. w. SkGggs
vs. p, W. X B. Il. Il. Co George G.
Marshall vs. Mutual Life Insurance Com.
pany; Ii, I. Brewing Co. VS.. Maria
Newell; A. c. Frantz We. j. IL. HofleeKer;
same vs., Elizabeth Hoireokar: David Car.
rick ~ Company vs. Alvin Il. Morrison; J.
Ross VS.. Brandywine Granite Company;
Arthur L, Cameron w. Mlllard i. Cock
ran.
The cases to ba tried by special iurors
are Mary A. Fitzpatrick vs.. Mayor and
Council Martin WOlhar vs. game; Lille
May McCRllrey and Jerome Conroy
VS.. Wilmington CITY Railway Com.
panyi Susan Tlghmun VS.. Mayor and
Council; Annie =. Fmnegan Va. vii.
mlngton City Railway Company; Patrick
$. Lyman by his next friend John I. Do
Ian vs. p, W. and b. Il r. Company;
Joseph Garlick VS.. Brandywine Giaul To
Company; Addle \, Hastings vs.. T., W.
and B. r. r. Company.
Tho cases marked settled or under
course OF settlement We're: Hugh Ram
soy VS.. Elizabeth Heud.icks; W. Woland
ana sons We. John d. Ward; Christian
Granshommie VS.. Mayor and Counc IL; /;
Mary Il; Little We. joseph Quinn; $. NJ.
Reynolds va. Aionzo Wnittock; Susan
EtttldEe vs.. Charles Middleton.
The nllla bona case OF j. Hood Wright
vs. eight dofend@nts and which were
marked under peremptory rule for trial
at this term were SO ordered.
IN CRIMINAL COURT. u
The criminal buslness was then taken
up. Clarence Burnhan. Samuel T. Hill
anu Howard Lewis, three Young white
men, were the iirst men to De placed in
the dock. They were charged Jointly with
breaking into the laundry OF Hop Lee and
stealing therefrom quantity of goods.
They entered pleas of not guilty and were
again taken back TO their cells for further
hearing.
John T. McElroy whose oase came be.
fore the court at its last session but was
continued until the present term answer
ell to his name. lie Is charged with ns.
sauting BIrney Furron Tho defendant
was intoxicated and created a sensation
by using prOfane language toward Victor
Is. Wooley who Is To represent hi IN ut lie
nearing. Attorney General Nicholson mo-
toned for continuance as the defendant
was not in n proper condition To be tried
John Eyans, n dusky youth wac ar
raigned charged with stealing twenty.
three chickens floln James n Shakes.
pear, Mil Creek Hundred farmer. When
| asked to plead John said ha did not steal
the chckens but had them In his posses.
sion when arrested A verdict OF not
guilty was accepted by the Court aud
John again taken buck TO his cell.
1 ha graud jury raturned true bills
against Robert Philips and Samuel Tho.
mas Tor carrying concealed deadly weap.
| onS.
! IL was 40 O'Clock TheE court adjourn.
| ed for the day.