The Evening dispatch. [volume] (Provo, City, Utah) 1891-1895, 1895-04-25
ALIAS

ALIAS
Summons (under amended complalnt.l
AsUMMUNS-lN TEE DISTRICT GOUhT OE
y the First Jud icial District of the territory
OI Utab, U TAB coun y.
The Anglo American Land, Mortgage &Agency
Co., Limited, OF London, curporaIion, 4halli-
tiff Vs. Thomas h. Earl anu harTleJt h. Earl,
his wife, Tne Lombard Investment company,
q corporation, and Mlifon b. W nitnel, Charles
5 Falrchild, Harry Moodeg SANFORD b.
Laid and Frank Hagerman, receivers ot Inc
Lombard Investment company. delendants.
Ihe People OF the territory OF ULan SEND
greeting to Thomas +. Earl and Harr1eCC b.
Earl, his vile, Tue Lombard Investment ooln-
pany, d corporation. ana Milton b. " n they.
Cnarlea s. Eairchild, Harry b. Mooney, San
ford B. Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers
of The LOMBARD InYestmenU company, de-
feUdant6.
You are hereby required to appear In an ac-
tion brought against you by tue aboYe Eaned
plaintiff, in the district court OF the First Ju-
dicial district OF the territory OF Utan, and TO
answer the complaint nled Unereln, WlLnln ten
days exclusive OF The day OF SerVlce) alter the
service on you OF this sumInon6-n served
within this county; Or II served out OF this
G tunty, but in this district, within twenty
days; otherwise wiJnin forty days - or
judgment bY default will be taken against
you, according 10 prayer of this com plalnt
The said action is brought To obtain decree
of this court against the defendants her elm for
the sum of Sl.Tu2.70 with interest Ut IL per
cent. per annum, from the lsu day of January,
A. ID. lo95, until paid, and Tor sl5O.U attorney
d.
that ON the 4th day OF March, 1885,, Thomas +.
and Harriet b. Earl, has wife. executed and
delivered TO The Lombard Investment COM
pany certain bond IN the sum OF Sl.6UU, u,
with per cent. interest with annum, per IL
per cent. after maturity That two OF said
coupons have not Oeen paid and that the same
with the principal has been declared due and
payable. 1hat on March zlst, IoyO. the SAID
Lombard Co sold and assigned the, ,said nole
TO plaititf VINO is now the IeFa noIuer there
OF, and did then and there guarantee the pay
menL OF The within note and principal within
two years from said last mentIo ed date. that
the usual decree may be MADE for the sale Ut
the said premises 10 pay SAID deDt, interest,
cosIs ana attorney ices, that the proceeds OF
SAFE may be applied i'll pay ment vi the amount
due plalnun and that SAID Defendants and
each OF tnem anu all persons Claiming under
them or either OF them subsequent to the exc
cution of saId mortgage upon salu premises,
either as purchasers, encumUrancerS OF other
wise, may be barred and toreclosed of all
right, claim, CT equity of redemption in said
premises and every par thereof, ana that the
said plaintiff may nave Judgment aud execu-
tiOn against the said defendants Thomas f.
Earl and Harriet h. Earl ana The l. L)mDarC
Investment company, for any detclenc,
which may remain after applying the pro-
ceeds OF sale.
For fuller particulars see copy of complaint
On file.
20 appear aud answer the said complainG us
iboye required, the said plaintiff will apply
% the court for the relief therein demanded,
md COSTS of suit
Witness the hon. William H King, judge, |
and the seal of the District court OF |
the First JUDICIAL district i'll and for |
lsEALl the territory OF I tab; this 10Th day |
oil Marc0, in the year of our Lord |
one thousand eight hundred and |
ninety-tve,
J. W, BEAsLEY, Clerk.
By GEO. HAvERCAAP, Deputy Clerk.
James A. Williams, attorney for plaintiff.