The Evening dispatch. [volume] (Provo, City, Utah) 1891-1895, 1895-04-24

| ALIAS
| Summons under amended cOmplaint)
| SNUMMUHS-lN TIE DISTRICT COURT Ot
| y the First Jud Cial District of the territory
| OF Utah, Utah cOun y.
| The Anglo American Land, Mortgage &Agency
| Co., Limited, OF London, Il corporation, plaln-
| tiff VS.. Thomas f. Earl and Harriet Il. Earl,
| his " ife, The Lombard Investment company,
| corporation, and Milton b. Whitney, Charles
| 5. Fairchid, Harry e Mooney, Sanford Il.
| Ladd ana Frank Hagerman, receivers OF Inc
| Lombard investment company, defendants.
The People of the territory OF Utah send
| greeting to Thomas f. Earl and HarrietJ Il.
! Earl, his wife, The Lombard Investment COIL
| pany, a corporation, and Milton Il, Whitney,
| Charles S. FairchiId, Harry E. nooney, Sam
! ford b. Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers
| of The Lombard InyestmenU company, de-
You are hereby required to appear in an ac-
| tion brought against you by the aboye named
plaintiff, in the district court OF the First Ju-
diciat district OF the territory of Utah, and to
answer the complaint tiled therein, within ten
days exclusive OF the day OF servlce) alter the
service ON you OF this summOus-It served
within this county; or if served out OF this
county, but in tins district, within twenty
days; otherwise within forty days - or
judgment by default will be taken against
you according To prayer of this complaint,
The said action is brought TO obtain decree
of this court against the defendants herein for
the sum of Sl,IU2'IU with Interest at IL per
cent. per annum, from The lst day of January,
A. d, 1895, until paid, and tor Sl5U.UO attorney
fees. and for COSTS OF SUIT. Plaintiff alleges
that ON the 4th day of March 1880, Thomas Il.
and Harriet b, Earl, his wife, executed ana
delivered TO The Lombard Investment COM
pany certain bond IN the sum OF i.6U0U0,
with per cent. interest with annum, per Il
per cent. after maturity That two OF SAID
coupons have not been paid and that the same
with the principal has been declared due ana
uayable. That on March 2lst, 1890. the said
Lombard Co sold and assigned the said note
to plai.4tif, who is now the lega holder there
OF, and did then and there guarantee the pay
menL of the within note ana principal within
two years from said last menlIO, ed date. That
the usual decree may be made for the sale OF
the said premises to pay said deDt, interest,
oOsls ana attorney tees, that the proceeds OF
SAFE may be applied i'll pa5 menI OF the amount
due plainLlf, ana that said defendants and
each OF them and all persons claiming under
them or either of them subsequent TO the exc
cution of saId mortgage upon said premises,
either as purchasers, encumUrancers or other
wise, may De barred and tOreclOSed OF all
right, claim, or equity of redemption in said
premises and every par thereof, and that the
said plaintiff may have Judgment and execu-
ton against the said defendants Thomas L.
Earl and Harriet IL. Earl and The Lombard
which may remain arter applying the pro-
Ceeds OF sale.
For fuller particulars see copy of complaint
on file.
And you are hereby notified that if you fail
to appear and answer the said complaint as
above required, the said plaintiff VIII apply
to the court for the relief therein demanded,
and COSTS of suit
Witness the Hon. William H King, judge, |
and the seal Of the District court of
the First judicial district in and for |
lsEALl the territory OF Utah; this 10Th day |
OF March, in the year of OurLord |
one thousand eight hundred and |
ninety-tlYe,
j. w, BEAsLEY, Clerk
By GEO. HAVERCAMP, Deputy Clerk
James A, Williams, attorney for plaintiff.