The Evening dispatch. [volume] (Provo, City, Utah) 1891-1895, 1895-03-06
ALIAS

| GUMMONS-lNT TIE DISTRICT COURT OF
| - the First Judicial District of the TERRITORY
| OF Utah, Utah county.
The Anglo American Loan, Mortgage &Agency
Co., Limited, OF London Il corporation nlain-
tiff, VS.. Thomas h. Earl and HARRIET Il, earl
his wife, The Lombard Investment cOmpsnV
Il corporation, and Milton B. Whitney Charles
). FalrchIld, Harry + Mooney, Sanford b.
Laud ana Frank hagerman, receivers oil The
Lombard lnvestnent company, defendants
The People OF the territory OF Utah send
greeting to Thomas L. Earl ana HarrietI E.
Earl, hIs wife, The Lombard Investment COM
pany, corporation. and Milton b. whitney
Charles 5. Fairchild, Harry E. Mooney, San
ford Is. Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers
OF The Lombard Investment company, de-
PENDANTS.
You are hereby required to appear in an ac-
ton brought against you by the aDoye named
plaintiff, III the district court OF the First ,ju-
dlclat district OF the territory of Utah. and to
answer the complaint nled therein, within ten
days exclusive OF the day of servicej after the
service on you of this SumInOns-if served
within this county; or if served out OF this
county, but in tins district, within twenty
days; otherwise within forty days or
judgment by default will be taken against
you, according TO prayer of this complaint
The said action is brought TO obtain a decree
of this court against the defendants herein for
the sum of 81, ,7U2.70, with interest at II per
cent. per annum, from the 1st day of January,
A. D., 1895, until paid, and for Sl50.00 attorney
fees and for COSTS 0t suit. Plaintiff alleges
that on the 4th day of March. $780, Thomas E. |
and Harriet e. Earl his wife, executed and
delivered TO The Lombard Investment com
pany certain bond IN the sum of Si,6OOGO |
with per cent. interest per annum with - |
per cent. after maturity That two of Said
coupons have not been paid and that the same |
with the principal has been declared due and /
payable. That on March 2lst, 1890. the said |
Lombard Co sold and assigned the said note
to plailtlh, Whois now the lega holder there
OF, and did then and there guarantee the nav
ment OF the within note and princiDsi within
two years from said last mentioned date That
the usual decree may be made for the sale of
Ihe SAID premises to pay said debt, interest |
3osts ana attorney fees, that the proceeds Of !
SAFE may be applied IL payment of the amount
iue plalnuh, and that said defendants and
each OF them and all persons claiming under
hem or either of them subsequent to the exc
'uton OF said mortgage upon said premises
lther as purchasers, eneumnrancers or other
wise, may be barred and forecIosed of all
light, clalm or equity of redemption in said
PREMISES ana every par thereof, and that the
aid plaintiff may have judgment and eyecu-
lon against the said defendants Thomas =
.arl and Harriet E. Earl and The lombard
Investment company, for any deflciencv
,nlch may remain after applying the pre-
eeds of sale. E
For fuller particulars see coDv of oor,,,Ioir+ |
n file. !
And you are hereby notified that if Won fail
} appear and answer the said complaint as
bove required, the said plaintiff will annIy {
the court for the relief therein demanded i
nd costs of suit !
Witness the Hon. William King iudre j
and the seal of the District court of !
the First judicial district in and for
isEALl the territory of Utah; this 18th day
of February, in the year of ourLord J
one thousand eight hundred and
ninety-tiVe,
j. W. BEAsLEY. Clerk.
By GEO. HAVERCAMP, Deputy Clerk
James A, williams, attorney for plaintiff,