Wheeling register. [volume] (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1878-1935, 1895-12-11

bayard Boston (kngiandl speech IN
cOrpOraJed in the Mccall resolution.
Mr. Dingley )Rep. Maine) followed
Mr.. Mccall and took the ground that
Mr. Bayard was an ambassador of the
United States and the question was
whether he should so far forget his
duties as 70 denOunce the policy of one
half the people OF The United States.
In reply 90 a question by Mr.. Crisp.
Mr.. Dingley declared amid applause on
the Republican side that his personal
opinion was that the OtfenSe Of Mr..
Bayard was impeachable and ought 10
De impeached by the House. Whether it
was policy for che House 10 impeach
was an0,ler question.
'I am very glad TO ge- the gentle
man S opinion. said Mr.. Crisp.
"I believe concluded Mr. Dingley,
that an example should be made OF
some of those gentlemen who are con-
s,an,iy violating ,he principles and pro
prie,y of official life. Mr.. Bayard
should be publicly condemned
Mr.. Cummings. CDem, New York;,
VINO got the floor az this point,
INJECTED SOME HUMOR
into the debate He said Jha, he did
not know whether The pending resolu-
-ion had been brought into the House
under false pre-enses but he did know
chat the resolution was based upon a
newspaper report of speech, that II
was brought I'm by a newspaper editor,
CNIr. Barre-0. and backed by another
editor, CMr DiDgleyl He himself was
q newspaper man and he congratulated
the newspaper men OF The country that
they 10 l3s spoke from the floor of the
House. lLaug1terl
Air. Barrett then closed the debate i'm
q brief speech I'm which be SAID be would
not have introduced The resolution had
not some one objected 10 the resolution
of Mr. Mccall This subject was one
near 10 the hearts OF the American peo-
pie and sh0uIi De- discussed.
When the previous question was de-
manded Mr. Crisp moved to refer the
. resolution 20 the judiciary committee.
This was lost ON rising vOte-SO 70
206
Mr.. Crisp demanded a yea and nay
vote. which was taken. resulting-90-
207. Mr. Cannon moved TO strike out
the words ''by Impeachment or other
wise. and his motion was agreed to.
AS amended. the resolution was
.,U .,..,-'' '' .' r1-., ~, NJ.
.-.. ,.' 90. '-' ,,,.,i ,--7i ,,-'ti1
r..7lsS i-'-'"' "'J'''' --1O O'-'''
,+n T,'' '6,,Dr,-r--., p-,or r-rrON-
nay, S.,i'..--'. '''-
..,5..,. .-,.-....- =, p.,.,-5
60 D.
-,
,,-,,,-,.- tl,,
~ .,.-I.,,,,.-5
i..rl..- -, r,,..i...-.,, l,-,,,t,cs1 r,..
.-t+.--.,-, ,.,- r1.., -~f.o-,,ss Z, po,,orJ
s-,ts.sa5C- ~ -re I--i-S5 S+ore.s n n
America at the Court OF Great Britain
as published in the London News under
date O.. November e. 1879.
iie llen quotes lhe Associated Press
ulepal~1 con-allinS me report or tht
speech. and the comment closes as fol-
lows.
And whereas such reflections on
me government, policy and people OF
l1e en-leo states ly an ambassador OF
tle Cnlled states DO " foreign country
anu oeloIe d loIe-5A audience. Is man
--eS,is in serious disregard OF the pro
pIle,-es anu ooilsdlons Wnlch should
pc oostI yea ul an oInclal representative
ol l5e Dileeo STATES ABROAD ana calcu-
Re r. ''''''' 81 ''-' ''O''
Resolved nv Tho House of PeDro.
sentatives that the 0omr1i-tee oD Eo~.
eieu Affairs he directed m aece,--s.i, .,
whether such statements have booT