The Evening dispatch. [volume] (Provo, City, Utah) 1891-1895, 1895-11-01
REPUBLICAN,.
Judicial,
Judge Fourth judicial District.
Az HATCH,

A. G. HATCH.
The gentleman named above is the
oppo nent of r.Wilson for the judicial
honora of the Fourth district. We
have not a word to say against the
privete lite of Mr.. Hatch, it is his abil-
ity to perform the grave duties OF
Judge of the Fourth Judicial with
which we have toEdeal. As compared
with Mr.. Wilson, his studies and
practice haye been extremely limited.
Let each voter use his natural sense as
a physiognomist, ,and then say whether
or not you believe Mr.. Hatch will be
as safe a man as Mr.. wilson to intruset
the scales of justice.
For State Senators, (-eventh District,
Utah County,
L. R. CUTLER.
About the only thing that commends
Bishop I. R. Cutler to represent the
residents OF Utah county in the state
senate is the fact that he is Bishop of
Lehi. Voters. remember that bishop
Cutler permitted his name to be run
week after week in the Lehi Banner as
Bishop T. r. Cutler Of Lehi'' for
State senator. Remember that in so
doing, he was willing to catch votes by
Vhe use of his ecclesiastical position.
Voters, remember thas Bishop Cutler
stands for the silly, selfish and per
nicious republican heresey, that the
law should reach down into the pocket
OF the wheat raiser and take two dol
lars therefrom and give one dollar to
che beet raiser, who is making more
money than the wheat raiser; and an
other dollar TO the producer of cane
gre root that the farmers south, and
southeast, are forced to fight with
plows. and hoes to keep out Of their
fields.
JOHN E. BOOTH. Provo.
is the other republican nominee for
state senator. For weeks, Mr.. Booth
permitted his name to run in the Lehi
Banner as "BIsHoP" John +. Booth,
and until The DISPATCH called the
Banner down. 1t is a self-evident fact
that Mr.. Booth was trying to catch
votes under his bogus title of bishop,
and thus attempt to make up in ecclesr
iastical weight that which be lacks in
intellectual force. Mr.. Booth stands
for the same principles of legal rob
berry as does Mr.. Cutler. Voters COM
1are Messrs. Warner .and Booth and
choose the one who strikes you as
being man in every sense of the
word, and who does not require the
title of bishop to win victory.
House of Representatives,
GRANT sIMONS, of Payson,
Voters, compare the above named
gentleman with the htalwart Johna-
than S. Page of Payson whom you
might have had on your ticket had 1t
not been for machine politics.
JAMES T, THORNE, of Pleasant
Grove.
is known as an honest and cons cien-
tious man, but is blinded by the mi
rage of bounties and protection that
is leading so many voters out OF the
waterless desert of Capitalization of
wealth for the Well-born and slavery
for The masses.
]. f. BRINGHURST, of SpringYille.
All that is necessary to say of Mr..
Brin2hurst by way of comparison is
that he is republican and stands
for protection and bounty robbery.
JOHN G. GRAHAM, of Provo.
We have placed John Q. Graham's
name opposite that of the brainy,
upright A. o. Smoot first, because
both are Provo men, and second, be-
cause the contrast between the men is
so marked. Mr.. Graham stands for
the policy of robbing Peter to pay to
Paul. Mr.. Graham's public service
and what he has done for Utah county
may be summed up in the following