The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1895-04-11
THE COURT RECORD.
Snnreme Court.

1896. Durbin VS. Redman. Floyd c. C..
Reversed. Hackney, J.-"Heirs' are not
"deyisees.' but are those who take by right f,
1921. Anderson vs.. Anderson ripley e
G. Affirmed. Jordan. J.-unless the privi-
ceptions cannot be filed after the close of
171e1. Sherry VS.. State Of Indiana. Wells
C. G. Appellants petition for rehearing.
Appellate Court.
1856. Roberts VS. Trammel Huntington
c. c. Reversed. Ross, c. il. There can
be no estoppel in pals where everything is
the party sought to be estopped was 1g-
norant of the facts out of which his rights
sprung where the party seeking 10 con-
clude him was not Influenced by the acts or
admissions set up. 2 In order to constitute
representation or a concealment of material
facts; fb) the representations must nave
been made with full knowledge OF the facts;
(c) the party to whom the representation
were made or from whom material facts
were withheld must have been ignorant of
the truth of the matter; I'D the party MAX
facts must have done so with the intention
that the ether Parg sh0 oo aee e
the other party must ha been induced
thereby to act. 3. There can be no estoppel
where there is no fraud. 4. Where party
is ignorant of his rights, and Is free from
actual fraud or culpable negligence, silence
will not estop him, although ne may nave
1903. Board of Commissioners VS.. Nlcn .f
Lawrence c. G. Affirmed. Lott. il. The
Board of Commissioners. in hearing a claim
presented against the county,. acts in the
capacity of an auditing committee, and its
acts are merely ministerial and not judicial
q A person free from contributory negli-
gence may recover from the county Tor
damages sustained by falling through de-
1929. island Coal Company VS.. Fisher.
Sullivan C. c. Affirmed. Reinhard, il.
When an employee is directed to leave his
usual work and assist in another line, Of
work in an entirely separate place he mas
the right to assume that such place IS IN a
safe condition. 2. An employe is not charged
with the knowledge of tbs, dangerous char
acter of the place in which he is required
to work 8. When the master is negligent
he is responsible, although the negligence
of a fellow-servant may have concurred In
bringing the injury upon the pl pa I'LL T.
pain and suffering from the injury COM
planned of may be introduced in evidence
1867. Woods Dalrymple. Henry Z. I.
Appellees petition for rehearlng.
Superior Court.
Room John l.. McMaster, Judge
Oliver Wells VS.. Fort, Johnston & Co.;
damages. On trial by jury.
Room s-Pliny w. Bartholomew, Judge.
HAYDEN r. Watson VS.. The Indiana
Veneer Company; damages Court instructs
jury to find for defendant
Circuit Court.
Edgar A. Brown. Judge.
Jacob Kahn VS. William M. st. Clair;
appeal from justice Of the peace court. On
trial by jury.
New Suits Filed.
Rosa B. Church VS.. Harry L. Church, suit
for divorce Superior Court, Room j.
William Garrison vs. Georgana Garrison;
suit for divorce. Superior Govt, Room ].
Mary j. Bronson VS.. Fred A. Bronson;
suit for divorce Superior Court, Room 2.
Henry Kirkhoff VS.. William c. Hahne;
suit for an accounting. Superior Court
Room ?.
AmeneaIie McGarrihan VS.. Thomas Me-
Garrihan; suit on judgment. Superior Court,
Room 2. aF