The Forrest City times., 1895-03-22
Proceedings OF the Circuit Court
LAW DOCKET.

s: B. Baskins admir- W. NJ. Stewart decd
| Va Ed Bonner, admir-. revived in name of s. ii.
Mann. adm r ad iitum, attachment.
j. W. Herrick VS. ]. N. Brown. damages,
| death OF the def { being suggested and not de-
MED, this cause lie revived in the name of :.
| II. Mann, as admir- ad litum. and continued by
dei't.
Francis Goodman vsD W Davis, damages.
plea of limitation sustained. motion for new
trial filed and oyer-ruled.
Sarah Rawlison VS. d W Davis, damages.
same proceedings,
Francis Goodman VS. d w Davis, damages.
same proceedings.
III Chstfield. trustee, VS. Cook and Henley.
cutting timber, motion for change of venue,
sustained. changed to Lee county and set for
second day.
] ID Campbell VS. G Yarbrough, ejectment,
continued by consent.
Sam Scott VS. II w Winthrop. continued till
next term,
J A Lindsey VS. Maria Patton dismissed at
cost of deft.
The Geo Arnold Co VS. b and NJ E Baskins,
replevin. continued BY consent.
VS. Martin & Cows X Chisenhall, dismissed
at pit IFS cost.
State of Arkansas vs. John Burnett. attach
ment and trespass, dismissed at cost of State
Nancy A Thomas VS. Jesse Feiker and A
Thomas. replevin, continued by consent.
N Fizer vs Walter German. debt, motion
for new trial. sustained.
Mary Bianton VS. Phi Littell. L e Merwin
referee with leave 10 report at next term.
Continental National Bank. of Memphis. VS.
JEFFERSON Lumber Co and IL Bemis. attach
ment report from sheriff of Crittenden eoun-
". on special ex.
w fl Rucker VS. Pyatt and Oakley. attach
ment. report OF atty for nonresident def't
nled, proof of pub filed, int of Gus L Noble
nleO, appearance of Pyatt and Oakley entered,
Judgment for plt'f Rucker VS. Pyatt and Oak
ley for $50. attachment sust. net proceeds
divided between pltff and interpleader.
VS. Martin & Cows w H Cotfey, replevin,
dismissed at cost of def't.
John NJ Judah VS. K A Haynie. ejectment
continued for term.
Wallace Wilson VS. Robt Mitchell. damages
appearance of deft entered and answer FLED.
viii Ingram VS. Chayers. dismissed at
plt'ff's cost.
Ed Owens VS. Mead. jury trial. verdict
for def't.
RI Humphreys VS. G W Lirtlefed, guard.
jury trial verdict for pitt.
Becker & Lewis VS. Wiley Neal. dismissed at
cost of pItf.
w Jones VS. George Franks. attachment,
Judgment for plt'f for amt. sued on, $3.50. at
tachment sustained.
wv Bush VS. Jas Russell, ct ais. damages.
motion tor change of venue. change of venue
to Lee circuit court. leave to defendants TO
file answer i'll Lee court.
Same VS. Same, same proceeding.
Jas. Hasley VS. Peter Covington. attachment.
II,
missed. motion for new trial oyerruled.
"A Jones VS. G Franks, replevin, judgment
for property, damage waived,
q Barrett VS. p Blanton, account, jury
trial, verdict for plt'f.
Smith. Graham & Jones VS. III W Sisk, trial
before the court, Judgment plt'f Tor sc 70,
motion for new trial. overruled. exceptions.
Thompson Wilson Co vsJ W Heskett and
\ Nelson. judgment for amt sued on.
Tw Yerzley VS. Walker & johnson. petition
for new trial oyerruied.
JIM Brown vs E Williams, sheriff. judg-
ment for def't.
Smith. Graham & Jones VS. ] w Lattimer
Judgment for interpleader.
JAS Smith VS. Pyatt d Oakley, vendors
lien, report of atty for nonresident deft
filed.
Rolfe & Hatcher VS. Pike Littell, replevin.
answer OF det't flied.
} W Beck & Co VS. John Young and
Honeycutt, attachment, motion TO require
pit II to make bill OF particulars more specific
motion 10 guash writ filed, continued by con-
sent
CA Walker vs. American Accident Co. DANA
ges. motion to quash service. and answer OF
def't ted. motion 10 quash overruled.
! Mary II. Lowe vs. philander Littell. DANA
ges, motion To make complaint more specific,
| oyerruied. answer of def iled. judgment tor
| pltf by consent for sl75, execution not TO is
sue before Nov. IS, %,
b Nelson ct al VS. ST. Francis county, ap-
1
| DILL. judgment for plt'f motion for new trial.
| filed and overruied. exceptions. appeal asked
and granted
A GRAY VS. L o Mcdaniel. admir-. contin-
ued by consent.
A Rolfe VS. ST l. NJ < Ry Co, damages
motion TO make more specific. continued with
| leave TO answer III GU days, amended complaint
| nied.
S W Wimpey VS. Buck Jones. def't, III b Gwyn
Co intp. attachment, dismissed at cost of
plt'n.
ME Hatcher VS. Est of A Hatcher, amend
ed bill OF exceptions.
Joanna Jones vs. l. Griggs trial By jury,
verdict Tor def't motion for new trial filed
and oyerrued.
Mary A Downing VS. p Littelll. admir- OF Rus
sell Suits. motion to dismiss appeal filed mo-
| tion 10 dismiss sustained and exceptions.
EQUITY DOCKET.
Il Brown VS. d Harroway, dismissed at
cost of plt'r.
| John Jones as next friend. VS. Phi Littell.
motion TO give effect 10 mandate filed.
Sarah Coy VS. Jno n Farmer, continued for
proof.
| Dawson VT John Parham. report of re-
eeiyer flied.
Francis Goodman as next friend VS. D. w.
Davis. exhibit to complaint filed. molten 20
suppress deposition nled and overruled, addi-
tonal paragraph flied.
Litilefield vs. Emma lizard. partition, con-
tinued for service.
Littei VS. W Yerzley and Ed Starks. mo-
! ssr,Ese h. L u