The Evening dispatch. [volume] (Provo, City, Utah) 1891-1895, 1895-02-28
ALIAS

CUMMONS-1N THE DISTRICT COURT OF
y the First judicial District of the territory
OF Utah, Utah county.
The Anglo American Loan, Mortgage &Ageney
Co., Limited, OF London, a corporation, plain
tiff, vs., Thomas h. Earl and Harriet E. Earl,
his wife, The Lombard Investment company,
a corporation, and Milton b. Whitney, Charles
5. Eairchild, Harry Mooney, Sanford b.
Laid and Frank hagerman, receivers OF The
Lombard Investment company. defendants.
The People of the territory of Utah send
greeting to Thomas F. Earl and Harriett E.
Earl, his wife, The Lombard Investment com-
pany, a corporation, and Milton b. Whitney,
Charles S. Fairchild, Harry E. Mooney, San
ford B. Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers
of The Lombard Investment company, de-
PENDANTS.
You are hereby required to appear in an ac-
tiOn brought against you by the aboye named
plaintiff, in the district court of the First Ju-
dicial district of the territory of Utah, and to
answer the complaint filed therein, within ten
days exclusive of the day of service) after the
service on you of this summons-n served
within this county; or II served out OF TINS
county, but in this district, within twenty
days; otherwise within forty days - or
Judgment by default will be taken against
YOU according to prayer of this complaint,
The said actionis brought to obtain decree
of this court against the defendants herein for
the sum of Sl,702.70, with interest at IL per
cent per annum, from the list DAY OF January,
A. d, 1895, until paid, and for St5O.OO attorney
fees and for COSTS of suit. Plaintiff alleges
that ON the 4th daY of March, 1880, Thomas f.
and Harriet E., Earl, his wife, executed and
delivered 10 The Lombard Investment COM
pany certain bond in the sum OF Sl,6OO.GO
with per cent. interest per annum, with IL
per cent. after maturity. Ihat TWO OF SAID
coupons have not been paid and that the same
with the principal has been declared due and
PAYABLE. That on March 2lst, 1890, the said
Lombard Co sold and assigned the said note
to pIaiA tiff who is now the lega holder there
of, and did then and there guarantee the pay
ment OF the within note and principal WITHIN
two wears from said last mention ed date. Chat
the usual decree may be made for the sale of
the said premises to pay said debt, interest,
costs and attorney fees, that the proceeds OF
sale may be applied in payment OF the amount
due plaintiff. and that said defendants and
each of them and all persons claiming under
them or either of them subsequent to the exc
cution of said mortgage upon said premises,
either as purchasers, encum orancers or other-
wise, may be barred and toreclosed Oh al
right, claim, or equity OF redemption IN sald
premises and every par Thereon, ana that the
said plaintiff may have judgment and eXecu-
tion against the said defendants Thomas h.
Earl and HARRIET L. Earl and The Lombard
Investment company, for any deficiency
which may remain after applying the pro-
ceeds of sale.
For fuller particulars see copy of complaint
on file. -,
to appear and answer the said complaint as
above required, the said plaintiff will apply
to the court for the rellei tnereln ueuIanueu'
and costs of suit
Witness the Hon. William Fl King, judge,
and the seal of the District court OF
the First judicial district in and for
IsEAI7 the territory OF Utah; this 18th day
of February in the year of ourLord
one thousand eight hundred and
ninety-five,
j. ". BEAsLEY, Clerk.
BY GEO. HAvERCAAP, Deputy Clerk.
James A, Williams, attorney for plaintiff,