Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1895-04-25
onONIY..LNI NOrMAsIEnn

NNhNtA hNA EtAm NltfH WHO complain
| aEalnal rich people Tor spenilHs their
money on Injuries, oham tsriEeutuuh
com lbint o. unreasonable aud incon.
sIs,rut, Cor the reason that eco Tor ~
his iclIOwmun are concerned, sreuG,r
BE- more useful than a lcuIer" j, WAS
pointed out that tho more horses aud
carriages, carpets AMI furniture, ain
dresses anu porcelain, ETC., the naDUu
aud bio family uuy and use, the better
Tor all the people engaged Ia the
raising or manufacture % the
articles named. The doctrine bee,
laid down was expressly qusllllod uy
the statement tht those aru NOT tbv
bert ways OF tpondiug money; mufy
PEOPLE would lc benefited by arch
mau's wealth, N ho established fac
t0uo6 ami aided Ia developing the
cluntry; but u he chose % spend
large sums uIon biz Iomicllo aud hi,
person lsuppusiug all the time that he
has neither ability nor inclination 10
invest bic gold be- any ether way in
sll conscience ho ought Go be- uuc1ut.
sgcd to 10 DO; by this means he would
do some good 20 tho community in
which he lives. al this was plainly
slated In the article referred 10.
10 would seem that this pro.
position Is o. plain NJ tho simplest
Of Eucili's Az.1ms, needing mo- proof,
no demonstration. Were it not Tor the
fact that people suffering from real or
Imaginary wfongt, oppressed under
burdens too heavy to carry aud yet
Impossible 20 throw on, often loo
their cool judgment ani reason 10 tho
extent that the most glazing arxumru.
lum nd humluem appears iu The light
Of an inialhblr syllogism, such Icmi.
goguos " uld not be able 10 secure q
hearing. They w0uli at once be- rec.
ognized us Unreasonable and incon.
sIstout.
lnc0niroverliblc a. this seems
10 be, Professor J. II. Paul, a.
Will bo seen by correspondence
Ia another pgTt Of the NEWS.
has found II necessary 20 hasten totic
rescue aud furnish well studied a..
gumsnt for tho proposition briefly
stated by this pEpsr. The pgoigss0r,s |
letter 1, highly diaacllo in tone anu IL |
20 written a. to convey tho idea that |
tue NEWS was radically wrong In
something, whereas whom the wrllor'. |
augmentation IL followed out the iaol |
appears that Il IL really an endorse.
mont Of the doctrine It 1t flfbt seems to
condemn. Lot ua soc.
Professor Paul very properly argues
that tho money OF man VINO spends
$1,000 on a watch will benefit tho
lab0ror who receives this SUN Tor
bis work. lie further argues that
the niau vino spends 81, 900 on farm
benefits tlrst the people who sold the
land and teolndly,ind tho men
who get employed on tho farm, thorc.
fore, II is better to spend money Oh |
industrial enterprises than on luxurles.
The NEWS stated tho same truth thus |
eve DO not say that those referring 10 |
buying luNutles are the bet ways VI !
spending money; We think more people |
would be- benefited by rich mau's /
wealth, aud be would be- much better
aud happier himself, II he established
acIoriys and aided in developing tho
the country" Now, 70 there b. any
difference Ia the position oil
this paper anu ia learned
critic, except In the manner of express.
lux the iieHs sought TO be conveyed, It
is not apparuuL Probably more clear.
uess and greater elegance will be
.laimel lgr the latter but that is
matter OF ta5to aud cannot form the
subject Of serious controversy.
Leaving this, then, out Of oonsiderl.
ton Nui turning aghin 10 the only
point mEIo by this Journal aul which
.ur c8Ts,sp9nNnt totally loBes sight OF,
that It 10 unreasonable 10 base agitation
among laboring classes on tho fact that
wealthy men sometimes sIcuu yast
,ums on iUzuIios, We ssaia Fay, Eill-
lut fear OF being mEuudurataoI, that w
iJ far % hi- fellow men are
lne sprudcrisa brn,fact u
Whoa nr spends 1000 Tor o. watch,
.ual money presumably Will Huu IL.
way 20 the I.uurur's home, the mrr-
rnant, tnr laTmtr or the bank ami 10
pm iud,hnitcly doing good. The
,pruder TO that extent enables other
people 90 Uo with the money what bee
b msu.i declines TO DO, TO wil-luvp,t
% 10 enIerpfItes, lend % TO Investors OF
ave it Uut f0r charitable purposes Ia
way Of depending money which, by the
auy,i u,t considered 90 the rr0itssoPs
'ommlr.cauoul, WHAT, then, lie Che
reasonable ground ut complaint
Tho feeble enlIG u Civ.
he subject q religious touch
,.lls for only passing remark.
II Iuo eEhorlaton to the people Of the
Lord to be- lenders and not borrowers
.rayFa auytutUv az rU 90 O.. t.....