The Evening dispatch. [volume] (Provo, City, Utah) 1891-1895, 1895-03-26
ALIAS


Summons t1nder amended cOmplaint.)
S,UMMONS-lN TIE DISTRICT COURT OF
y the First judicial District of the territory
OF Utah, Utah cOun Y.
The Anglo american Iand, Mortgage Agency
Co., Limited, of LondUn, corporation, plain
tiff. VS.. Thomas +. Earl and Harriet E. Earl,
his wife, The Lombard Investment company,
a corporation, and Milton Il. whitney, Charles
5. Fairchiid, Harry Moonev, Sanford Is.
LGdd and Frank Hagerman, receivers of The
Lombard investment company, defendants.
The People of the territory OF Utah send
greeting to Thomas F Earl and HarrietJ E.
Earl, his wife, The Lombard Investment COM
pany, a corporation. and Milton b, Whitney,
Charles S. Fairchild, Harry f. Mooney, San
ford b. Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers
of The Lombard Investment company. de-
PENDANTS.
You are hereby required to appear in an ac-
tion brought against you by the above named
plaintiff, in the district court OF the First Ju-
dicial district of the territory OF Utan, ana TO
answer the complaint filed therein, within ten
days exclusive OF the day of service) after the
service on you of this summons-if served
within this county; or if served out OF this
county, but in this district, within twenty
days; otherwise within forty days or
Judgment bv default will be taken against
you according to prayer of this complaint,
The said action is brought to obtain Il decree
of this court against the defendants herein for
the sum OF Sl,1U2'iO with interest at IL per
cent per annum, from the lst day of January,
A. ID, 1885, until paid, and for $4,000 attorney
| fees. and for costs of sult. Plaintiff alleges
| and Harriet Il, Earl, his wife, executed and
! delivered 10 The Lombard Investment COM
! pany u certain bond III the sum OF Sl,6U0iO,
with per cent. interest with annum, per II
| per cent. after maturity rnat two of said
| coupons have not been paid and that the same
| with the principal has been declared due and
| payable. That on March 2lst, 1880. the said
| Lombard Co. sold and assigned the said note
| to plaiatiff who is now the lsga holder there
of, and did then and there guarantee the pay
ment of the within note and principal within
| two years from said last mentioEed date That
| the usual decree may be made for the sale OF
| the said premises to pay said DEBT, interest,
| COSTS anu attorney fees, that the proceeds OF
| safe may be applied in pay ment of the amount
| due plaintiff, and that said defendants and
each OF them ana all persons claiming under
| them or either OF them subsequent TO the exc
cution OF said mortgage apOn said premises,
! either as purchasers, encumbraneerS or other
| wise, may be barred and fOreclosed OF all
right, claim, equity of redemption IN said
| premises and every par thereof, and that the
| said PLAINTIFF may have Judgment and eXeeu-
| ton against the said defendants Thomas +.
Earl and Harriet E. Earl and The Lombard
| Investment company, for any deficiency
| which may remain after applying the pro-
ceeds OF sale.
For fuiier particulars see copy OF. complaint
| on file.
Aud you are hereby notified that if you fail
| to appear and answer the said complaint as
above required, the said plaintiff Will apply
to the court for the relief therein demanded,
and costs of suit.
Witness the Hon. William H. King, judge,
| and the seal of the District court OF
the First judicial district in and for
! IsEALl the territory of Utah; this 10Th day
| of March, in the year of OurLOrd
| one thousand eight hundred and
ninety-tive,
j. W. BEAsLEY. Clerk
By GEO. HAvERCANIR, Deputy Clerk.
James A. WIlllauS, attorney for plaintiff.