The Democratic advocate. [volume] (Westminster, Md.) 1865-1972, 1895-04-27
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.
20. $3.50 EQUITY
In the Circuit Court for Carroll County. sitting
as n Court of EQUITY.


In the Circuit Court for Carroll County. sitting
as Court of Equity.
Joseph Wolfe. plaintiff. vs. Mary n. 0gle,
widow of James w. 0gle. deceased, Edith
Hughes and Thomas Hughes. her husband,
Bertha Smith and Lewis n. Smith, her
husband Lydia Rove and John Rove, her
husband. Wilmot Ogle and Laura Ogle,
his wife. Herman Ogle and Mrs Herman
Ogle. his wife. and George p Buckley and
Granville 5. HaincS Mortgages. deten-
dantS.
The object of this suit is to procure decree
for the sale of the real estate of which James
W. Ogle. late of Carroll county, in the State
of Maryland. died seized and possessed. for
the payment of the debts of said deceased.
The bill states that the said James W OgIe
departed this life intestate in Baltimore City
in the State of Maryland, in the month OF
August. 1894 leaving a widow surviving HIM.
whose name is Mary \. Ogle. and the follow
ing children, his only heirs at law: Edith
Hughes. Bertha Smith, Lydia Rove, Nilmot
Ogle and Herman Ogle. That said Wilmot
Ogle and Laura Ogle. his wife. reside in Oils
burg. in the State of Pennsylvania. and that
the residence of Mrs. Herman Ogle Is I'M
known. That said inteState at the time OF his
death left no personal estate. and no letters OF
administration have been granted to any per
son as administrator of any personal estate of
said deceased but was seized and possessed
Of the following real estate about twenty
three and half acres of land. situated
partly in Carroll county and partly in Frederick
county. Ofthe value oiabOut 5000, and a house
and lot situated in Union Bridge. on Farquahar
street, Carroll county, of the value OF about
100000, both properties IN the State OF Mary
land That said real estate Is encountered by
four mortgages, three Of which are held 10y
George p. Buckley and the other Is held hy
Granville ). Haines. the precise amount of
which are unknown la y0ur orator. That sand
intestate was at the time of his death indebted
Ia plaintiff ON Joint note for the sum OF
Sl96 80 drawn hy /. y. Smith and James ".
Oele dated March $uth. 1885. and payable
siN months after date. and on which said note
have been paid hy the said interstate IN his life
time certain credits, leaving a balance due
thereon of about Sl25.0O 81 appears by eN-
hihit NO io said bill That said plaintiff
is entitled 20 have said real estate sold for the
uavmcui Of his claim and of other creditors Of
said interstate. or 80 much thereof * may be-
necessary. may be sold for tbs payment oi the
debts Of said intcSiate.
II isihcrctorc ordered hy the Court tins llih
day 81 April A. u. 1895. tina; the plaintiff, 2.
causing q COP, ut this order to be advertised
in some newspaper published In Carroll eoHn.
o.. MARYLAND. once a week for four successive
weeks before the 18th day 1T MAY, 1885. If
the object aaa substance ot tins bill, give no.
tice tu the non resident defendants mentioned
iu said hin and warn them fu appear ia tins
Cour, in person or hy solicitor au OF he'"n.
the 2uih day of Nav, lS95. 90 show causa, 81
any they have. why decree -houla NOT ns
CHARLES q ROBERTS