The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1895-09-21
SUMMONS.

IN THB DISTRICT, COURT IN AND
for the Third Judicial district OF Utah
territory, county of Salt Lake. James P.
Freeze, plaintiff, vs.. John ReadiIng' Annie annie
Reading, Amos W Butler It j. IN, M. Stout s.
Hutchinson, Henry NJ. Sanborn and Utah
National Bank. corporation, defendants
Summons. The people of the territory
Annie Reading, Amos w. Butler, j. NJ.
Stout, and "A. B. Jones, j. c. Vaughn;
p: L. Hutchinson, Henry NJ. Sanborn and
Utah National Bank. corporation, de-
PENDANTS. You are hereby required to
appear in an action brought against you
by the above. named plaintiff in the dis
tIict court of the Third JUDICIAL district,
Of the territory of Utah, and to answer
the complaint filed therein within ten
days, exclusive of the day of service)
after the service on you of this sum-
if served out of this county, but in this
district, within twenty days; otherwise
within forty days-or Judgment by de-
fault will be taken against you, according
to the prayer of said complaint. The said
action is brought to have judgment
against defendant John Reading, on four
for $1,000 with interest from February
14th, 1895 at 10 per cent per annum, for
500 attorneys fees, alleged TO be due on
certain promissory note executed by
Ter, Nov 18th, 1891. for 1000 with interest
from date at ID per cent. per annum,
same being due and wholly unpaid save
interest to Feb. 1ttll 1875, and being Sc
p1 emises first hereinafter described, exc
cuted by said defendant Reading to said
Butler; End, in sum OF $1,000 with interest
at 10 per cent. per annun from Feb. LIST,
1895 and 800 attorneys fee against de-
PENDANTS Reading; alleged TO be due on
a certain promissory note executed by
Ter Feb. /, 1892, for $1,000 with interest
from date at 10 per cent per annum, same
being due and wholly unpaid save inter-
est to Feb. !, lSg9' and being secured by
ondly hereinafter described, executed by
defendants Reading TO said Butler; 3rd,
for $1,000 with interest at u per cent. per
neys fees, alleged to be due on a Ger
tain promissory note executed by defend
ants Reading to plaintiff FEB. 10th, 1892.
per cent. per annum, same being due
and wholly unpaid save interest to Feb.
10th. 1881, and being secured by mort
gage of even 1o. date teo on premises thirdly
PENDANTS Reading to ]. NJ. Stout and A.
r. Jones; 4th in the sum of S1.40C with
interest in the sum of II per cent. per an
mum from April 9th. 1892. for, 500, attor-
ney's fees and costs Of suit, alleged 10 be
due on a. certain pronissory note exc
outed by defendants Reading to plain
est from date at Il per. cent. per annum,
same being due and wholly unpaid save
interest to April 9th, 1892, and being Sc
cured by mortfS fa Oh even date on
executed by defendants Reading to plain
tiff, the notes and mortgages in first
two causes of action herein mentioned
having been duly assigned to plaintiff,
Who is now the owner and holder there
Of; to have a decree of foreclosure for
the sale of all of said premises, adjulg-
in payment of amounts found due plain
tiff as above; that defendants and all
persons claiming under them be barred
and foreclosed of all claim or equity
plaintiff have a deficiency Judgment
against defendants Reading and for other