The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1895-05-10
LAW AND MOTION CASES
PEREsIPTORY CALL WILL CON-
MENCE ON MONDAY MORNING.
The Calendar Contains Three Hun
dred and Sixty-FOur Cases, Which
Will be Taken Up in the Order
Given Below.

Chief Justice Merritt will commence
peremptory call on the law and motion
calendar at 10 o'clock on Monday
morning. The calendar contains 1854
cases which will be taken up in the
order given below:
1-Annie Wittmaack VS.. Ferdinand Wit
mack.
3-Nellie Bonner ct al. VS.. Nat NJ. Brig
ham.
Al. R. Nichols VS.. n. B. White ct al.
5-Crescent Mining co. vs. n. 3. Whlle
6-B. K. Block & Co. VS.. NJ. Lochwitz.
etc.
7-Phineas H. Young VS.. LOvina A Sud
S-Phineas H. Young VS.. Lovina A. Sud
SlS-Utah National Bank VS.. Isaac Sears
ct al.
9-P. ]. Hannigan VS.. w. L. Wilt.
ia H. Hennefer VS.. Jennie e. Hays.
11-Rebecca a. Bunce VS.. Jennie Z.
I2-Jas Mclaughlin ct al. VS.. Jennie E.
i$Celia NJ. Campbell VS.. Jennie E.
Il-Utah and Montana Machinery Com
pany VS.. F. ]. P. Pascoe.
l5-Charles Roberts VS.. Salt Lake City
&c. L. Hawley VS.. L. c. Crossman
16l2First National Bank VS. w. A. Coop
er ct al. ,,s,x,.
and Loan Association.
1S-Hudson Smith VS.. Paul Droubay.
19-J. H. Bacon, etc., VS.. ]. NJ. Ottinger
ct al.
2o-Peter clays vs.: Peter TaXey; oo+,,r
21-Salt Lake Building and Manufactur-
ing Company VS.. T. R. Higgins ct al.
22-Preston Reeves VS.. Patrick McEVoy
2s"Robert Vincent VS.. Joseph E. Crooks
24~Abba RumeI VS.. Truth A. Miner;
2CJ. w. Farrell, etc. VS.. anton hiei
2s-Hesston. Creamery Company vs.
27,John Beck VS. Henry NJ. Ryan ct al.
2S-Philip Neder VS.. George NJ. Cleland
29-Seth W. Morrison ct al. vs. Samuel
e. Vance ct al.
S1NWilliam Lowe VS.. Salt Lake City.
32-People etc, VS.. ]. G. McAlEster
3S-Ida e. Weaver VS.. w. L. Plckard G-;.
3ESamuel Mcintyre VS.. George Crls-
85-Wiiiiam F. Neslen VS.. Samuel P,
SSJoseph Coutin vs. Utah Undertaking
S7HBoyd Park VS.. R. L. Duvan ct al.
3SWilliam Smith vs.. J: A Goodhue.
4O-F. Roys ct al. VS.. John T. Conner.
41-John H. Lloyd VS.. Salt Lake City
Railroad Company.
42-Watson manufacturing Company VS..
Jordan Valley Manufacturing Company
4S~symns Grocer Company ct al. VS..
H. G. Button ct al.
4LOrson P. Arnold VS.. R. NJ. Jones
4@Brower. Petit. ETC.. VS.. S. B. Miner
4S~sarah ]. Williams VS.. Sarah ]. Will
I'D. B. Carson VS.. Daisy Carson.
4S-Solomon Karpem ct al. vs. Earls
81 u D. Ledingham VS.. c. E. Pearson,
| etc.
5O-Gustave Kroeger, etc, VS.. Brigham
! Young Academy
52-National Bank Republic VS.. Sylves-
ter Cunningham.
Company vs. o. F. Carlson ct al:
54EJ. F. Updegraff VS.. Utah Steam
55-Kate L. Haines VS.. Utah Steam
| Laundry Company ct al.
56-H. c. Shurtliff. Jr., VS.. S. H. H.
57-Homer ]. crandall VS.. Reginald H.
5gHenry K. Bogert VS.. Eliz. Mehesy
ct al. 49,
6O-John T. snelson VS.. Lizzie snelson.
61-Julia T. Mulvey VS.. John Snyder
62Nsalt Lake Building and Manufacture
ing Company VS.. Salt Lake Amusement
sc. NJ. Arnold vs. A. G. HOLSTER
6EFreed Furniture and Carpet Com
pany VS. Mile H. Dugan.
65-Wallace Smith & Co. VS.. +. }. Nc
Laughlin ct al.
T J. Mclaughlin ct al.
67-New York Mining Company vs.. John
Il 6ss sn&NRo York Mining Company VS. John
e 69@Portland National Bank VS.. T. j.
Angel ct al.
7G-H. P. CT. Coates VS.. Louis Hyams
nIJerer,iah NJ. Richardson VS.. Cres-
cent Mining Company.
72-L. c. Crossman VS.. L. F. kullak
7sJohanna Elder VS.. Peter J. Peterson
74Mwm. H. Culmer VS.. R. G. Wilson
Thames Anderson VS.. Edward B.
Critchlow ct al.
76-Edward NJ. Frye VS.; E; S. Richie.
T-Catherine L. Haddock VS.. David
8GMichaeI c. Scully VS.. Henry Newell
ct al.
SLJarnes Sampson VS.. Geo. Z. Yeadon
ct s al; Lancaster VS.. Georgiana o.
sen. -,
City Railroad Company.
SS-W. L. Douglas VS.. George A. Wilder
ct al.
S4-Mountain Ice and Cold Storage Conn
pany vs. Salt Lake City, etc.
S55Spencer Clawson ct al. VS.. Jos. How
S5iECharles Foreman VS.. John F. Up
degraff.
81 S7-John E. Dooly ct al. VS.. H. N. Win
SS~Mary S. Blackmore VS.. E. L. Sheets
Ss~Alice S. Little VS.. James T. Little.
S0-Bountiful City VS.. Joseph Perkins.
9l-Thomas James VS.. Bountlful city.
92-Remington Johnson CO. ct al. VS..
Samuel l.. Iooais ct al;
So. NJ. Arnold VS.. James NJ. GOODWIN
ED. W. Virgins ct al. vs. VIM. Har-
kins ct al.
ct al.
96-Luela C. Crandall VS.. Anne S. K.
s7eN. ". Wheel and Foundry Company
VS.. Salt Lake City Copper Manufacturing
SSHLizzie A. Smith VS.. Adella NJ. Hard
Ss-Joseph Goddard VS.. E. H. Parsons
ct al.
101-Brown Shoe Company VS.. c. NJ.
Freed.
1os-James Hattenbach VS.. D. Alexander
1oiEDavid C. McLauglin VS.. w. B. bod
1O5SDavid c. Mclaughlin VS.. Geneva
iosNB' K. Block & Co. VS. Blackburn q