The times. (Owosso, Mich.) 1882-1897, 1895-09-13
Circuit Court.

Business in the September term of the
circuit court has been as follows:
People VS.. Austin Barney, assault, dis
charged on payment of costs; case being
drunken row at Bancroft.
People VS.. l.. Buck, larceny; discharged
on recommendation of prosecuting attorney,
goods taken from his wife by Buck having
been returned.
Geo. W. Miller VS.. F. f. Hoyer, assump-
sit; continued.
Joseph Breaugh and J.McKoune plead
guilty to selling liquor to minors and were
each sentenced to pay fine of 500 and S.
costs or spend ninety days in the county
Jail.
of abandoning child, were arraigned and
refused to plead. A plea of not guilty
entered and the case continued for trial un-
til the Gath OF this month.
The case of John Comerford VS.. j. II.
Copas was reported settled.
John Ii. Malcolm VS.. e. Herbert Bailey;
case dismissed for failure of plaintiff to file
security for costs.
John ID. Lonsbury VS.. John A. Barnard.
Order vacated requiring plaintiff to file
security for costs.
Ira Sprangleberg VS.. Ursula Burpee, con-
tinued without costs TO either party, also
the case of George w. Millen VS.. f. F.
Hoyer.
In the case of Mary w. Milliken VS.. the
city of Corunna. for damages, the court ex
tended the time heretofore granted to move
for new trial or settle bill of exceptions,
to 60 days.
Charles Burgy, of the Owosso Brewing
Co., charged with selling liquor to minors,
refused to plead. By order of the court a
IA oe mt guilty was entered. Gporr"
Wright and George Selzer are his suretles
for $500, for his appearance in the.court on
the oath inst.
VIM. st. Clair, accused of taking improp-
liberties with female under the age of
fourteen years, was arraigned and refused
to plead, and plea of not guilty was order
ed TO be entered. Accused claimed TO be
poor and unable to procure counsel and the
court thereupon appointed Thos. j. Hors-
man to look after his defense.
The court, IN the Fuller divorce case,
granted the petition of Sarah L. Fuller for
temporary alimony, granting her S25 for So
licitor's fee, and $40 for witness fee.
Mary E. Atherton, in her suit against the
village of Bancroft was required to give
S150 security for costs.
In the case of Eli e. Doan VS.. l.. G. and
e. M. Shelby, on motion of Attorney WIKI
ON, for the defense, the plaintiff was order
ed to give security for costs in the sum of
500.
In the case of Mary e. Anterior VS. the
village of Bancroft, the defendant, by its
attorney, Wixom, demurrer to the declara-
ton, and after hearing the attorneys of the
respective parties, the court overruled the
demurrer, with $40 attorney fee to the
plaintiff. The demurrer was based on the
ground that the proceedings in the case had
not been in accordance with the law of 1895,
providing for the incorporation of villages,
as to the manner in which suits should be
brought against them.
The foreclosure suit Of Stephen b. Fuller
vs.. j. G. Williams was decided in favor of
the plaintiff.
The action to remove a cloud from the
title, brought by William III. Clark, VS..
Timothy and Ella III. Smith was decided for
the complainant.
George b. Symes and Frank T. Harris,
ct al, brought action against Sarah B. Ford,
ct al, to removed cloud from title to some
land, and were granted decree. A SINH
lar decree was granted them In their action
against J. s. Hotchkiss, ct al.
DEGREES of divorce have been granted In
the following cases: Almira A. Post VS..
Isaac II. Post; lila Pyle VS.. Sabin Pyle;
Martha Marvin We Vim Marvin