San Antonio daily light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1886-1907, 1895-01-02
COUNCIL AT WORK.
SPECIAL MEETINGS REGARDING
SEWER CONSTRUCTION.
City Attorneys Opinion Rejected
and Work Win be Urged For
ward Soon as Bid Is Ac-
cepted.
Mondays special city council meeting

Mondays special city council meeting,
called to receive the report of the finance
and public Improvement committees o.
the sewer bids, was well attended. A
large audience principally of bidders and
contractors, being present.
The committee reported there were IS
bids, only 81 OF which were formal These
were read. They were for the entire con-
StructiOn:
StratfOrd & Hawkes., of Brooklyn. n.
Y, S2S6, 93l.l 49, George Baer, Kansas City,
S322. 1896; j Il. Binjry, Denver, Col,
1881, 2O945: r. NJ. Quigley & Co., st.
Louis. 1896, 1879; Samnel Katz q Co.
Omaha, Neb., $780, Is: Schryvar &
Dunn Bros. San Antonio, 1886, 31737: E
j. HanlOn. sioux City, Ia, 1852, 4O5 81; w
6. Allen az Co., indianapolis, 1854 400 SO:
w. f. Geddes, d. d. SeerIght and George
Steinmelz, Denver, Col. 1862 Ala %; T. b.
Townsend Brick and Construction com
pany, GAINESVILLE, O., 1868, COZ SO; Adam
Maurer and Jos; BslSer, San Antonio,
1867, 1877 Is; Geo. A. TeDney, Chattanooga,
$50 400 %; Ltphardt IL WnterhaIter
Detroit, Mich, 1871 1856 20; Wilson &
Struck, Cincinnati, O., 1882 ,259; Rockford
Construction Company, Rockford, H..
1897, 1883: NJ. j. Condor, Knoxville,
Tenn, 1887 ;457 %; Campbell, Dennis &
Kansas City, Mo-, S4O5 O42,l J. H.
Medley g. Son, Chattanuoga, Tenn,
s25.7O5.53; w. &. Raoul ard WadiIeT
Atlanta and Macon, Ga, S424 63O. 73: the
truln BambrlCk Construction company.
st. Louis, 1892, 7S44S; A. G. POUCH, Col.
umbuS, O., 1882 84439
The average of the above TWENTY-FIVE
bids is S314,7l1.lS
Bids by districts were as fellows:
James Mark v. Milwaukee, Wis, Dis
srict No 1, S49,357.lS
S =. Maurey and E. 5 Maurey, San
Antonio, District No l. S?5, 9S7 So; No 2,
Sl4.04725; total. S40035 p.
j. 0 Garrett, San Antonio, District No
q, S2s, $3.50; No. :, Sl3,S7O %; total, S42,
443 "a.
IRE Albert Gamble Construction com
pany of st Louis, District No. ,, Sal ,496.
40: No. 6. s2S.052. 10: No. Z. Sl3, 796 50: No
s, 1877, 1912; No. Q, $I7,O9l.5S; total, $3.50,
I9S %
George Tenney. Chattanooga. Tenn. g.
District No |. 1855 II: No. ., $50, 7O8 40;
No 4, S62, S55.7S; No 6, S25, 7Ol 40; No. s,
-sS5, 6O027; No. TO- S3S, 2O5 O4; total, 1902
Go 81.
Daniel Foley, Indianapolis, Ind. Dis
trict No. 2. SIC 957 80: No. 6, $57,2S7.7O:
total 1914, 245 20
P. Mcdonald, Kansas City, Mo, +Ds-
trict No. l. $2l,l78O5; No. ?, S3S, $50 IS;
No. 3. S?1, 1928; No. f. $58, $50; No. 5. $35,
$50 O6; No. 6, S2S, 553 %; No. 7, $l3, AZ:
total, S2O7 1884.
Brown & Daoney Dallas Tex District
No. l. $50 045 50; No. 2. $40 365 90; No. 3,
s27,9 1864 No. 4, $50, 122 96; No. $, s33,-
29s.59; No: i, $50 800 .O5; No. :, $16,l
II: No. S, $l12,5l4 .O5; No. 9, $3l,2jO 80;
No 10, S65 $685.: total, $3.50 SAIL.
George p. PrendprGaSt. st. Louis; Dis
trict No !, St4,5S9.2S; No. 3, S22 .344.77;
No. 4, SCI, 1866 80; No. 5, S27.OS2.99; No. 10,
S43, 4O5 go; total, Sl9S, 1898
Allen & Veiths, St. Louis, District
80 527 I'd. M < S0S III 81. M 2
$l3, 15OS7; No. 10, S42,S64.2O; total, sl26, =
714.l6.
Samuel Katz & Co, Omaha, District
No /, s3s, 4OS.O3; No. 6, $40, 433 81: No s,
s79,94Ln; No. -s5S, SO5,49; total, $751;
5S7.9
Geo ]. Baer. Kansas City, Mo, District
No. 1. 1865 4s; No. 3, S34907 %; No. 3,
7IO.75: +No. 6, S25,677.71; *NO. Z, Sl2,025 s.;
mo. s, S73, POS n; mo, 9, SIS, 329.sO, No.
10. S37, Cos u; total, 1929, 7lS.GU.
Wilson 81 Stoke, Cincinnati, District
No. /, S46.64S.1 10; No. 3. SAB Isl .43; No. B.,
so. 23l IS; No. 4, sol ,6S6.4l; No. 5. S30,0S6.
a: No. 6. $50, 32O.45; No. Z, $l4, 9O7.27; No.
5. SS4, 402 81; No. 9. SIS, 222.72: No. 10, SAL
33l 10: total, 1896 OILS 10.
E. j. HsnIOn, Sioux City, Ia, District
No, l, S3S, O37 ~; No. 2, S35 996,6S; No. B.,
$40. III. AS; No. 4, S54, 3S7.32; No ), S26 O!3.-
4s: No. 6. $26, $40 IS; No 7, SI3, 72O.96; No.
:. sSI, 2s9 90; No. 9, ST., $3.50. As; No. 10, $40,
773 SIS; total, 1854, 707. 20.
Robert G. Storrie, Houston, No. l, A1,-
Gas 80; No. Q, $40, 500; No. 3, so; 23O, 80; No.
ia 55: No. 7, $l3,7l6 90; No s, So, 962 60;
No. 9, sls.9S4.21; No. 10, S42,056.95; total,
W G. Allen & Co., Indianapolis, Dis
trict No. /, sac, 4S4 IL; S37, Isl O6; No. ,,