The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1895-01-12
FOR THE STATE.
s. County Members Favor
Grain Inspectors.
3 or CORPORATION LAW.


Ia 0. ~ measures mapped out by
......sv rYetni,ers Of the legislature
l.'-..xs~sa. they VIII furfnish a ga0d
81 - sezzsssss work. Those men,
81 . - x6an interviews were pub
y . x-ssersay summarized some OF the
.s..s .,.pxt;oas Of the day. besides a.
- = useazEres in which they in
- axe q warm interest. and the
$ -. wixh other members pub
s..,.~ wiz provide additional food
f.s::sssss...rhf 10 their eo-iaborers- In this
.z..s,,, Is, interview IN which w. r.
.z - some abuses growing out
- -oxporaxSon law and recommends
.-.rsx 10 % away with them will
~ s. interew. The interviews are -
{ s1r.ersuehnent Comes First
IS. ceustor ). II. Friak. Of she TWEEN
{ ~ 1Estrict: II have no special hob
/: 81. .nr axe 10 grind through ieeiz-
5 - setaon. represent the people as
:. ard shall try to discover what
! f. IS q xs.ire. / can say. however, without
4 -. thai think one OF the desires
J "a sstr<ncbnenf in state expenses.
! -. ,nesskr should be given study and
coneideratioa. The subject OF re-
.s,~ent would, I think, include the
3 Awsy with useless commissions.
y 1<1wse the Torrens system Of land
= NJ come up before the legis-
ausin. From what know Of IT.
z i p = he opinion IL would be q good
Z could be successfully inaug-
4 1sci q system would probably
:, Introduced In new state like
! e. $50 than the older ones East.
IS S11R what is done. the subject win
Il 1reas study and careful research.
- RATION to the appointment OF a
- ssp<ctor look at it in this light.
= - presents itseif. IL would multi
= - number of state officials and
S16n1k ~ Why there is any more reason
= gr.in Inspector than q lumber in
n1Rseatatiye a. j. Goddard. Of the
ystkkrd district. Is deeply interested
= - rrsarn Of the criminal laws OF the
1 Aud says that although he Is not
k<3ls eacGzh TO point out just how the
- sAps:id be brought about. the ne
~ for It Is very apparent. There is
6nsrh technicaIlty and too much delay
I q eating the laws. On other needed
- be says:
s3 the question Of reduction OF state
mfstares certainly hope to see them
~1R 10 as economical basis as Is
sn1>ttpf with good government. That
~ b unnecessary waste In the states
ln$es In some departments / think IS
I ~ NJ can only speak generally, as I
- nj given the time TO the matter we;
~ enAbses me to say wherein our laws
~ ht improved and expenses iessened.
ew our state commissions doubtless
n . he abolished and there are some
- sseded. A grain Inspector 1 think
kattally necessary and in a way this
J - = I commission.
~ Mtsrestsd especially In state
~ and revised state road and ditch
~ recognize the difficulty. however,
~ past Of getting just such legislation
= 4 wanted A new law should be
Nnet consistent with the constitution,
! <asft xaouid be an essential snodifIca-
~ u eur road and ditch Law as last en-
tars
% the question of deficiency judg-
nkz:s and legislation annuIllng them my
- = not fully formed i am inclined
fa51k thai therc should be some snosii-
s'>saaa " the law now In force. but there
- TO stsss 10 the question of vital Inn
7ss . borrower and lender. II we could
~ 81 arpralsemeat law and a stspu-
~ amount at which such property rnust
I'D Z might be all right,
rejection OF the delinquent tax pen
g 3 per cent aaa interest at about
- cent. with taxes made payable
- snnasiiy al the yoiltlon of the tax
~. ] believe might work for good all
Hsae bat there Should be some Induce
~ 2 fae payment. which a removal 81
. s<aalsy certainly would not leave.
~ Inclined TO think the state should
- sHae action IN the matter Of rail-
- ates. bat the question is one i am
a'asasr with 70 the extent OF commit
Hsnysels.
are some points In favor OF the
3fass hat transfer system and some
S&ssS u - safe "a say that some ar
s. meet ought 70 be made whereby the
- soala not End Il so expensive to
{ s''sss shsssae,s.
ssate examiner for records might
( 80 rsars expensive than we should like
80 arae AMI might occasion or create
sFy efsiceFa or deputies who
100 saFs 70 DO she work all over the
- y raew OK the very title discus
:. 8 sae question cannot answer7 ..,s:!tv
= e ssEiss % such a proposition.
sasns ara greatly interested in is
= sase university. living as I do so
- ~ Z and shall use the hest efforts
! : sas'asle q IN for,hering 50 worthy
wants Grsia inspectors.
4 I. sss7@ssi4sa jUsu W. NcfSaanSlf az
49,. sis-niais' ssistriet II am mos, a.
- y iaEor - retrenchrnent i'm ali
- ANYTHING 70 reduce the state ex-
- saa especially taxss. Considering
. ss ''aass are sal she present aepreS-
- ~ h'sss 81 sHs4uess. net only taxes
IS q n'Sa, hui also the penalty aaa In
- 9 ss&snqaeTlts, \ S per cont. pea-
a.. s esss'siens asa asn IN favor of re-
-. sSs rate Of iafsrest On sfelinauen<s
PEI csas.. wslch Is exosbltant. 10
] Il. ssat Tais wauIa have precisely
! - - snecf as she preseeft Ian ana b.
~ 70 the government and much
3. 80 % TIE people. L an IN favor az
s i $50 & Useless eeaamss ~sians an.s
- - IN s&yoS - good STATE roads
So So avs w.ih references "a the lax
e tae deficiency Judgment, "a
So believe thar Il a man hsr-
- ass ana sves as security his
81 certain piece 81 rroperty
q $3.50. aa4 gaanot repay xse han.
&C., $50 'eaasas the moasy sAeu4 BE