Santa Fe daily New Mexican. [volume] (Santa Fe, N.M.) 1885-1897, 1894-10-01
[. S. LAND COURT.
Closing the Business of q Busy Term
The COchitl Appeal-Docket
for the Next Session.

The land court has finished it's duties
for the present term, and all that remains
to complete the work Is the entry of a
formal order of adjournment. This will
probably be made on Wednesday. Chief
Justice Reed and Judges Sluss and Muir
ray left for their respective homes Satur-
day night. Judges Fuller and Stone are
still here winding up number OF formal
matters connected with the court. Judge
Stone will leave for Denver about Wednes-
day and Judge Fuller will 60 the latter
part of the week to the City of Mexico,
where, in company with U. s. Attorney
Reynolds, he will make some investiga-
ton of the old records at that place. On
October %, Judge Fuller will take evil
dence at Guadalajara, Mexico, on
THE PERALTA CLAIM,
which is made to several million acres in
this territory and Arizona. Mr.. Milet
Provost will come from New York to as
sist in the taking of this evidence.
On Saturday afternoon the court
did little beyond setting business
for the next term. Notice of appeal
was given in the Bartolome Baca grantby
Mr.. Vroom, one of the attorneys for the
claimants. The court announced that its
next session in Santa Fe would be held
January 90, 1885, when the court would
sit continuously until the first Monday
in March when the Arizona term of court
opens. The death of Hon. VIM. E. Earle,
of Washington City, prominent mem
Der of the bar, was suggested and feeling
remarks were made by o.. s. Attorney
Reynolds and Mr.. John H. Kuaebel Oh
behalf of the bar and Judge Stone in be-
half of the court
SET FOR TRIAL.
The docket as set for the next term is
as follows:
Jan. 2S, 1895, No. 6, Sebastian de Var
gos, Messrs. Vroom and Purdy attorneys.
Jan. 80, No. III, Lucero grant, Jas. H.
Purdy attorney.
Jan. 81, No. 20, Neris Antonio Montoya,
F. W. Clancy attorney.
Feb. l. Juan Gid or j ohm Heath grant,
j. B. Cessna attorney.
Feb. 4, No. "a, Dona Ana Bend colony,
S. B. Newcomb attorney.
Feb. 5, Nos. 36 and 1l2, Chino Tejano,
j. H. Knaebel attorney.
Feb. 6, No. SO, Bone grant, Jas. H.
Purdy attorney.
Feb. 8, No. 81, San Clemente grant,
Warren, FERGUSON g. Bruner attorneys.
Feb. IL, No. SO, Lucero spring, repre-
sented by Mr.. Purdy and No. 2O9, Otto
de los Medanos T. F. Conway attorney.
Feb. IL, No. 70, Nuestra Sonora de la
torney.
Feb. 13, No. 81, Pine, Mr.. Purdy attor-
ney.
Feb. IA, No. So, Gotera, F. Downs at
torney.
Feb. Is, No. 81, Cieneguilla grant,
Vroom g. Purdy attorneys.
Feb. IS, Nos. 80, 1853, 2s3, being claims
to the Petaca grant, represented by
Howard, Jeffries & Earle, L. B. Prince E.
L. Bartlett and Chas. A. Spiess.
Feb. 10, Nos. 142, 2O4, 236, the Valle-
otto de Lobato grant, in which conflict
ing interests are represented by Howard,
Jeffries & Earle, Warren, Ferguson &
Bruner and Chas. A. Spiess.
Feb. 20, No. IS, Lovato Gonzales, I. B.
Catron attorney.
Feb. 81, No. 81, Sierra Mosca, 7. B
Catron attorney.
Feb. %, No. 1913, Santa Cruz, 7. B. Cat
ron attorney.
Feb. 25, No. SO, Salvador Lovato, N. B
Laughlin attorney.
Feb. 26, No. 81, Baranca grant, N. B
Laughlin attorney.
Feb. 81, No. 179, Juan Bautista Valdez
N. B. Laughlin attorney.
Feb. 2S, Nos. 80, and 269, San Antonio
de las Huertas, T. B. Catron and Howard
Jeffries g. Earle, attorneys for different
claimants.
THE CoCHITI CASE.
| 1t is understood that the appeal OF
Joel Parker Whitney to the supreme
court of the United States, in the Cochit
case, has been taken under stipulation
for its submission on printed briefs
without delay. This is an arrangement
agreeable all around.