New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1894-01-10

man E:kstein why he had cluimed in his !
application that i: hazel been granted a
State Certificate for Minnesota without
examination. He replied that he did
not know at the time hat was meant by
State Certificate, and that he had under
stood a certain statement relative to the
granting Ola Principals Certificate in case
of his election to the Principalship of
State High School to be equivalent to
the granting of State Certificate. The
Chairman then asked Mr.. Milne whether
he now holds 4 State Certificate. Mr..
Milne refused to answer this question.
Mr.. Mines attention was then called to
the following statements contained III
his application: II am a graduate of the
Clinton Collegiate Institute and the
Ottawa Normal School, taking the full
course in each. am also an under grad
uate of Toronto University" He was
asked by the Chairman during what year
or years he attended Toronto University.
He replied that this question would be
answered in his biographical sketch.
The following communication was
then read:
university of Toronto:
Memorandum from the Registrar.
3, 10, 1898.
R. Nix. Esq,
New Ulm, MINI.
Dear Sir
l do not find that
VIM. a. Milne ever attended the Univer-
sity. If he says he was present any years,
let him say what these were, and l shall
try to verify them.
Yours truly,
James Brebner.'
Examiner Nix said, if Mr. Milne had
filed the promised biographical sketch,
the question of his attendance at Toronto
University could have been decided long
ago.
Mr.. Milne was then asked by Chair
man Eckstein why he had submitted a
Second Glass Professional Certificate to
the Board of Education as we'll as to
this Board, while in his application he
claimed that he holds a First Glass Pro-
fessional Certificate. Examiner Nix
stated that he had repeatedly requested
w. A. Milne to produce his First Glass
Professional Certificate. Mr.. Milne add
mittcd the truth of this statement. The
Chairman inquired whether Mr.. Milne
holds and has in his possession First
Glass Professional Certificate. Mr.. Milne
answered atirmatively, whereupon it
was unanimously decided by this Board
to require the production of such certif-
icate.
Mr.. Milne was then informed by the
Chairman that this Board will stand nc
further dallving and that he would be
required to submit within reasonable
time the original papers and testimonials
required TO >ubstantiate the statements
made by aim in his application, and also
the original testimonials of which alleged
copies had been appended thereto.
Mr.. Milne asked for two weeks time
to furnish said proofs.
1t was then unanimously agreed by
this Board f.. require Mr.. Milne to fur
nish, on or be foreDec. 4, 1898, certificates
of standing in the branches studied by
him in the educational institutions O.
the Dominion, together with his Firs
Glass Professional Certificate and sucl
other original papers, including origina
testimonials, as may be necessary tt
verify the ~rnt,,cilts ma':e by said Min:
IN his aspiration for The position of ;
teacher in ,';i> district.
1t was fuythcr agreed that Mr.. Milne
be required to file with the Secretary Of
this Board on or before Wednesday
Nov.22, 1898, an photographed sketch
including a complete enumeration o.
the studies pursued by him in the severa
educational institutions of Canada, Civ
ing these studies separately for each in
stitutiOn.
A remark made by Mr.. Milne caused
the Sec'y to produce the records of this
Board and to explain in what manne1
Mr. Milne had been examined in certain
branches. Examiners Et kstein and Nil
said that after Mr.Milne had failedin thu
written examination in physics. they hat
offered him supplementary oralexami
nation in the physical laboratory,i in which
Mr. Milne should perform experiments 0
his own selection. srating the inference
he would have his pupils draw there
from. and that Mr.. Milns had declinet
to take such supplementary examllinatiia!
Il