Arizona republican., 1894-10-05

and every effort of this newspaper has been and will be devoted and for this end and purpose we ask the earnest and faithful co operation of every Re- publican iii Arizona.
 In this connection we desire to say that the success of the party depends in large measure on party discipline. Organization commands success; the lack of it foretells defeat. Dissensions easily turn maiorities into minorities and victory into downfall.
 Just at this time, when the promise of Republican success in Arizona is so bright, the Republicans of the territory look to everyone to forget personal feel ings and wishes, and to pitch in and work hard for the common success of the Republican cause.
 As usual, the Democratic newspapers of the territory, together with those in Phoenix and elsewhere, are lying about our candidates. And they will continue thus to lie; and their falsehoods will be duly supplemented by eminent and distinguished orators of the Democratic party. To attempt to refute in detail the false3 charges which these people will make would be useless.
 Suffice it to say that the people need have no fear if the Republican ticket is elected. The most prosperous days of Arizona have been under Rep ublican rule. It was under a Republican ad administration that the mines thrived and prospered. It was under a Repub- lican administration that the sheep and cattle kings reigned.
 Under 8 Democratic administration the mines were ruined, the sheep and cattlemen bankrupted, and not only Arizona, but the whole country was in- volved in panic of gigantic propor- tons.
 The election of a Democratic presi- dent and the attack of Cleveland and his friends on the thrift, industry, bus mess and manufacturing ability of the country prostrated credit, checked in- vestments, deranged business, demor- alized and shattered manufactures, and spread ruin throughout the land.
 The disgust of the people has been shown by recent elections in Vermont and Maine, where the Democratic vote has decreased and the Republican has increased. Let us look at the record of the political changes which have taken place since November, 1892, when Cleve- land was elected.
 In 1892 the Democratic candidate for governor of Massachusetts was elected by plurality of 2,524. In 1893, after eight months of Cleveland, the Demo- cratic candidate for governor of Massa- chusetts, was beaten by ,697 votes, or plurality of nearly 10000 larger than General Harrison got in that state in 1892. In New York the Democratic plurality of 45 ,513 in 1892 was changed into Republican plurality of 24,4S4 in lo93. In Pennsylvania a Repu blican plurality of 63,747 Tn 1892 was more than doubled in 1893, and became a Republican plurality of 135,146. In Iowa Republican plurality of p ,965 in 1892 became a Republican plurality of z,356 in 1893. In Ohio Repu blisan plurality of 1,072 in 1892 became a Re. publican plurality of 80,995 in 1893 In Rhode Island Tn 1892 the Democratic candidate for governor had plurality of 1855. In 1893 the Republican can. didate for governor had 8 plurality of more than 4,500. In Vermont in 199l the Republican candidate for governor had plurality of 19,702; in Vermont in 1894 the Republican candidate for governor had plurality of over 2S, ,OOO, In 1892 the Republican candidate for governor of Maine had 8 plurality oi 12,531. In 1894 he had plurality ol nearly 3S,OOO.
 This is the record of Cleveland's work thus far. The vote of Maine, where