New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1894-06-13
PORTABLE RUBBER BATHTUBS
INDISPENSABLE IN TRAVELLING.
H00GMAN RUBBER COMPANY,
nucAnv.y 81 WEST 23D ST..
COR. GRAND ST. ADJ DIN Az ". Ho '-'..

here for frankly answered Mir. Hayemeyer when
trust and the present one had not endeavored TO
control legislation Of congress WIN Wv ~
tm9tn, money ont Of such legislation The WI
ness sali he had contributed to the Democrat
State campaign fund last yea 10 m0d iis's
amount-ne forgot the exact figures ne "a ai way,
year Without refreshing his memory. .,... 10
Contributions 70 local political orgahlza.ions' nv
fore the Trust and by the Trust. and the american
Sugar Refining COMPANY ara no n3 20 rr min,
i tn do. 10 be- It IS very '"'""'' '''' 'O' s
R@Gnng Company c6ntribute to either Of the polii-
cal parties ia the state OF New-York. -. .,.,.
Nj Havemcyer- We have large Interests in ms
need everything that the city furnishes ana GiVss
dlvdual ana corporation and firm. trust or what
you call ii. do these things; anu We 40 IN
with the expectation OF whichever party succeeds
your interests viii be guarded ,,o, -, rro.oc-
ton for our contributions. Contributions were also
given to the Republican party in Massachuset'S,
dominant party. wherever the majority Is very
large that is the party that gets the c9nlDutioa
because that is the party which controls the local
Senator Anen-Then the Sugar Trust is Demo t.,
crat In a Democratic state. ana ltepup''"" }"
M l,rp" RavemcycrAs far as local matters are
CONCERNED ! think that Is about II. ,
He could not give the amount contributed ny the
Sugar Trust sn to So bs rst hnd not contributed
70 the Anti Snapper fund MI. Alien asked for fu
data as TO all money contributed by the AH'I''a
Sugar Refining Company or any or rs onl' c,S . "n
s account or In its interest IN tho dlnereh' 0lat's
Of tho Union In 1892 and 1885, for ponu'si puII'arS
~ any political party. whether National Statr q!
local The request was granted by me colllh'l,rc'
ana Mr. IIavemoyer asked an opportunity 10 con
suit his counsel before furnishing the data cai'u
for. .,.i 10 s,tI his
oc,i,nq,ion VS. executor % his fathers la-i WI.
president Of the Acme Fsrtidzing company inl
rnanggng partner Of cord Meyer GO. lie hal ~
connection with ihe American sugar kein'lA Oh,
many EXCEPT as 4 stakeholder The 'sth'' W. u
s,nckh,'der IL represented tho estates s'ocNnv.-
ing interest and had talked with senator's SH'u
and Nlrphv and had tod them that the ,asl -
zion did not afford sufficient proit~tOh ID 'uc uhH
Industry Ny Meyer denied having been present ~
any consultation between members or me Huba'
Trust and senators In thu Capitol or AhN"nrrr -
TIL, rest II Mir Meyers testimony Whr Hol ''
poriant The committee Will meet tomorrow. an,
The Grand July has decided 10 return tilr ~"
against John : Shriver Washington c1rrcSp'n''i'
III ''The New-Yurk Mall and Express anu -. ~
TSlv9ris Ncw-York correspondent uf Inc I"'",
Ie,Dhla Press" for refusing t. Eive inc souri, "I
tho;r Information - the Senatorial inFrs ''L Nhs
Committee In regard to statements about the Sls
1'r.,sf and Democratic Senators. and me mic
states District Attorney t. engaged IN preparing me
irlictmen;s He has notified MtsS:S. Mr@-.I-
Schryer and Edwards 10 appear before th' illl''.
Court on saturday 10 answer 10 the mum ''"''''
and give bail or go 10 Jail