The Atlanta constitution. [volume] (Atlanta, Ga.) 1885-19??, 1894-04-17

ed when Judge Wilson said that the al
legged forgery was based on the letter which
brown, ner icnooinate.
The evidence III tnls case shows he
said, that they got the letter from the
husband OF Wessle Brown, M hoDinson
Inc evidence shows that MIR. 0tou carried
that WesaIe brown letter around IN ms
pocket
y minute later Judge Wilson had handed
the alleged forgery 70 the Jurymen 10 eX-
anime, aha Wnlie this was gong on Juoge
IlSon, sitting quietly IN the witness box,
waiting until the jury was through with IT'S
INSPECTION, nappencu 10 catch Mr. Stoii y
You'll hear from this later on, broke
out the SLOW put penetrating voice OF MI.
'Inere Is another court Ill Wncn tndt VIE
floinuatiOn snan be settled"
W nat do you mean Stefnly asked
Judge !lsOn, ny me otner court: inere
VAS tienauce III MS voice ard manner.
Il A4cetn, s.tlu -ur. o,oI-, Qu.ct.y as be-
fore, tnat you lnsInudted lnat mad some
ln4lIS 70 90 with lna forgery, M4lcn / Ue-
nuunce as vile ana lnlailuua!
w nat 90 you py ether court
what 90 You meah ny the otner court!
persisted JuuSc w iiSOn.
Alr. 1toi snIlteu his chair, but lhade
no attempt al explanation, anu just tnen
j duge lJraQley, looKlnG somewhat aatoii-
lsIieu, stopped the embryo quarrel
Now, gentlemen enough OF THIS lie
Judge y, nSon bowed ana Went on speak
ing .lpout the letter. contenuina That even
admitting that Madeline Pollard Wrote II,
Judge Wilson, in conclusion, asked the Ju-
nv TO impaie the defendant with the JaFtih
OF justice ana mold hun aloLt on IL a. an
example to others disposed TO WofhS -uolil5'
and Justice would cry out, Amen.
Judge Wilson finished at 2:30 o CLOCK, ana
the court Immediately began his charge to
the Jury, reduInS from manuscript LII ITO
course Judge Bradley Sald;
.luaGe ISrnGieS's Charge.
s',Vith the outcome of this cause, whether
that outcome be for the Plaintiff or the de-
PENDANT, this community, nor the country.
nor humanity III general mas any t1t,,.!,.i,
and IL should not matter Oe iedlilef ,
weight Win you as to the direction III
when you shOuld render your Nerulcl' "l"t
the community or the Wof1u az idl 81 hiaS
tniuk OF it. gu should not concern yout-
selves about the VindicatiOn OF American
womanhoOd. or the Vindication OF the lam
ily or the vindlCatlon Oh the country Gl1
in the abstract. Your province Ia TINS case
is 10 indicate the truth, ana your duty IS
to render such q verdict as the law ana
the evidence require. You are 10 determine
the rights Of these parties III ~" ton NY
Versy ard not 10 settle any abstract pr4Ii-
clinics of morality, however important Such
principles may be. The question III ' ms
case and the ultimate question loi tHe
enlightenment OF which alone al OF these
many circumstances have been put ana re-
ceivcd in evidence including me stories
of the lives OF both the plaintoif and de.
fendant is whether a contract OF
Of In2r3.aa,e was entered into between these
parties: and that question you are to de-
tremine upon the evidence.
In conclusion Judge bradley s2ld;
no sum it all up, if you fail to find a
contract vas made or that the defendant
was excused for the performance OF II,
volrr verdict should be for the defendant.
ii. however, You lind that SuGh contract Ct
riii exist ana that the defendant was not
released therefrOm, you are to ma Tor the
PLAINTIFF
In