Wheeling Sunday register. [volume] (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1882-1934, 1894-01-14

across IL, In red ink was the words; "Sus-
pended 9-22-92.n
Q-Do you know anything about the fig-
ures In red ink, Ayes. / wrote them
myself.
Witness was then asked about the prop
erty referred 10 by the witness Richie,
and said II had been paying 81 rent since
1889
Asked to Mr. Reilly's hearing. witness
said matters usually bad 20 be read 20 him
twice, 10 about the usual tone OF VOICE. Il
don't know that had 10 raise my voice"
Asked about the Wholesale Grocers' As
sociatiou, witness said he really knew
very little ABOUT it. bat he knew the n On
oers each gave a certified check 20 fulhll
the rules OF the organization. Witness did
not know what the object was.
RE-CRoss ExAMINATIoS.
BY Mr.. Hubbard l-Q.-I forgot TO ask
you, on cross-eNami nation, whether the
meat BUSH ess was a. business or mott
Al could not say asto that, only for
certain period.
O.-Wel. how was Il for that certain
period. A-Snch was the fact.
-Q-That 1t was losing buslnessi A
Q.-You say the old gentleman told you,
on one occasion. that Thomas gambled.
and was not wholly reliable when out on
the road! A.-Yes.
Q.-That sort Of thing did not happen
while you were At the store. A.-No.
- y y
as 20 what Mr.. Reilly said about Thomas
Didn't he once ask you for your opinion as
TO Thomas. Ale did on one occasion.
Q.--ADd you asked II he wanted your
honest opiDioui A.-Yes.
Q.-Aud you gave III Ayes.
Q.-And what was iti Al said l
didn't agree with him.
Q-And what did he saw Al don't
think hc liked it very well He remem-
Dcred IL for some time.
Q.-And he never forgave you for it,
Al don't believe he did.
Q.-Hou said 70 Mr.. Reilly, on the oc-
casion of the talk about Tnomas-he called
you up 10 the desk and talked on that sub
Jet without anything to bring it upi a.
Yes.
Q.-You said, the last thing, believe, 10
Mr.. Russell, that Mr. Reilly generally had
TO have things read over TO him a second
time, and that he seemed hard OF hearing
Al said / presumed so. That was the
custom.
Q.-Dldn't you say. yesterday. he was
not hard of hearing but that you thought
he did - to save time! A.-Some had
that opinion.
Q.-That was not your opnionl A.-No,
know he sometimes heard things not in
tended for him.
9 Aud that satisfied you he was not
hard OF hearing: A.-Yes.
Redirect
BY Mr.. Russell -Q-When was the
meat business not profitable: Al opened
an accOunt-a set OF books with tho meat
business February l, 1872, and from that
time 10 the close 10 was not profitable.
Q,-That was after Mr.. Reilly'5 death
Ayes
Q.-What was true before thatl Al
know nothing aooutit.
RE-CROs9.
! BY Mr.. Hubbard -Q.-Do you mean
you knew nothing, or that you didn't hav,
access TO figures. Al had no means OF
getting at it accurately before that.
O. But without keeping accounts OF the
meat business, couldn't you, as booSkeeper,
know what the meat business WAS doing
A.-Not unless kept accounts OF il.
Q.-Why, il tue meat business should
MAKE $4,000, wouldn't you know IL: A
No.
Q.-You wouldn't know it, A.-No: for
there might be loss OF $4,000 somewhere
else, aud the aggregate account would no
show where il was
C.-WhO was running the meat bushes
after 1902! Amt Luikert.
0.-When you opened that account. you
put IN II the cost OF the meats purchased
up 20 that time, and which were then or
handi q think so. Witness takin.
out and looking at papers Mr.. ReillJ
| directed Fritz LuiRert TO take Tnemorau
DUN OF the stock OF meats on hand Feb
ruary l, 1872.
BY Mr. Russell Q-What Mr.
| Reilly! A.-James Reilly
I BY Mr.. Hubbard Q.-Weu. it went
! into the account Q.-Tes, 1 opened q
| separate set OF books with the pork house
! Q.-Aud those meats on hand went in
Ayes.
Q.-When were those meats bought
An the October or November OF the
years before
This ended the examination, and counse
! for proponents offered % introduce enc re-
| cord OF the proceedings before Coun :
| Clerk Hook, relating 20 the offer NJ OF "a,
/ Will for probate. Counsel for the contest
ants objected, and were overrulCd, al,
the papers We're put i'm.
| MIR. Russell taru said b. had been agreed
that tie family OF the late Thomas 81
! Reilly cons sted, besides his widow o
| Thomas W. Reilly, VINO was Of age: VI a
| tilda 6. Reilly, who was of age. j. i
Reilly, aged 20, Mary &. Reilly, aged l6
Josephine Reilly. aged H. Michael reilly
aged IL, and Helen &. Reilly. aged q; tina
the family OF George Reilly consisted of
/ himself aud wife, there being no children
mat the family OF James Reilly cousiste,
| OF himself, wife and two children, Charlie,
I aged . and 4 -ues, AGED !. the latter havip,
been born since tae death Of Michael
Reilly, that John Reilly was not married
that Mrs JamisOu's family consisted %
herself, husband and two children, Henry
aged 10 and Matilda aged 3.
Mr. Hubbard also said Thomas w
Reilly, son Of Thomas, was one OF the
/ contestants
MIR. Russell said IL was also agreed tina
Michael Reilly. Jr., was widOwer witt
one daughter, Fanny g., aged II.
The proponents then rested their case q
= :53 p. mo-.
Mr.. Russell said 10 had been inpossibI
TO secure the attendance OF Fritz Luiker
as he mad left Fulton aud gone 20 Narkc
on the South Side, but hey would hav
him present Monday morning.
The jury was then dismissed until g."
q. no. tomorrow, and counsel aud the Cour
consulted about the argument ~ wa
thought the speeches would commsnc
Monday afternoon. and as the Court wa
not disposed 20 place a limit on the arg,
meut, n is safe 20 say that about four dat
Will be taken up iu the addresses 90 ia
| jury. and the case Will not bc fully made %
before Thursday evening, at the best. au
~ may not 90 70 tho jury before Friday
Immense audiences are expected To- hes
the speeches.
ASoTHEE line OF fine long "sweer
FUR capes on sale for few days only p
very low prices
gro VI. Svook g. Co.
CIoaks must go $40. $40. atg and 81.
/ Young Ladies ana misses Ctpaka. chotc
now - ~. -ENNf A THOMAS