The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1894-03-01
LAWYER KxR6E,s BILL.
ne Says Mrs. Clara n. Earle Authorized
Hin to BrisG suits and she Denies It.

ne Says Mrs. Clara n. Earle Authorized
Hin 10 Bri.E suits and she Denies It.
Before Judge Andrews in the Supreme Court
yesterday. Lawyer Ladislas KsrRe. son OF the
late Prof Kareo OF Princeton. began q suit &c
recover 81 1885 from Mrs. Clara n. Earle fol
professional services rendered between Janu-
AIRY and May. 1891.
The defendant 10 the daughter OF the late
Curtis Noble. who. at the time OF his death. 10
1877. was President Of the Savings Institution
OF Brooklyn.
and at his death left personal property valued
at between $500. 900 and $500. 900. besides real
estate.
The entire estate was divided between the
widow and her three children. and after the
widows death in 1884. the children received
each an equal share OF her portion; The de-
estate Is believed to have been fully $500. 900.
In 1873 she married Edward Earle. She
cation. and also arrane cd that he should lake
a, course OF law In Columbia College. Then
che placed her entire estate in hi. hands and
January. 1881. Mrs. Earle EN- pioyed him to in, ;
with the way her husband and brother were
conducting her estate.
band lad abandoned her in 1880. and she also
a separ.tion: and she wanted Mr.. K"reS to GET
Mrs. Earle. in her answer denies that she
ever gave Lawyer karg5 any authority to be-
ICED him to proceed In any OF the alleged mat
tiers he refers to. hnt she ad mits having had
which these eV matters we're Sroachs1 'A"''r IN
In court to-day two letters were offered in
syidsns &C. tending to sstablish the PLAINTIFFS
karge. and were as follows:
13EAsr surrrHIRD sTRrEr. April Is. 1891
m h SOSn 5:r, for tn: n.
aS 10. SGa :ssa Tor 1t prob
WY s,mn3, ! sue foi an a1sclu,s separation and
:s:ERsI q: :SS6
.ss s, oass. 's Sils's
;:i sSS sssss,:i-;&: boy n +: p;e%.:S P.oyd:
children, E'ys nm NJ. sw .dueat:n: short hand is
;oms;hnF .O%srd me .IDRo5, q NJ, wife ana
Ii..i no NOR. TIM. should :. lost 2hs,."y, yon'
ssii 90 several times. livery day bring. crushing real
.Sn cs. AID S
$4,000. $50 900. $500 Of Inortgagss-a fortune
Nv: nicely on ,s.t sum year something more must
~ N' 4. EAHlE
Another letter. dated April %. 1891. says:
by obtaining my money throughtn. sale Of
% saSRGT1 longer .
not remain In my house OH M limited means cannot
leave, having no Mace to 40, but my sister ana
der the money circumstances that exist, cannot
there. Ny daughter and must he fed. othsd and
housed IL seems strange my boy aud his
in Paris us they DO; Mr boards at re Lincoln. Nhs
daughter anu are the verge Of staIyAtlnnt IL
terrible TO know and feel that each day draws
are Srown on H.. od St.os no: .. s or Ds'%5s
late to save me mentally Don't blame me for seem
ing impatient. don't think would like to ZEE ins
driven mad Very truly a.. y. EEARLE-
Lawyer KareR was cross-examinsd by Law
yer Frank BoaIdman, who raised the wrath ~
Congressman Franklin Bartlett and Lawyer
Frederic Card. who represented Mr.. KarGe. ny
stating that II was his opinion that Kargos bill
was n swindle
Judge Andrews called Mr.. Boardman to or
Ter and the witness leaned forward In his
hair and shouted: That remark Is coWArdlY
his court room" The examination will be
this morning.