The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1894-01-19
LELAND sr1rFonD.s EsrArE
a nsport thst Thers T. TrsuS,. Bstvss>
Hts widow srd Mr. Huntisetou.

HIs widow snd NJ Hunusetou.
slN FRArorsco. Jan. 1S.-Ths truth about
certain stocks and bonds claimed By Mrs.
Stanford AZ part Of the estate OF Leland Stan
ford comes out definitely in the inventory and
Advertisement Of the great estate. Some
months ago. when an inventory was prepared
for tho use Of the appraisers the following
paragraph formed part OF the sworn decara-
ton OF Mrs. stanford:
The sad sEocutrix IL Informed and believes that
other property the hands OF other persons In
the city OF NEW York and elsewhere Of which the said
sxecutriS has been unable with reasonable thgenos,
TO ascertain the exact nature character or value aud
tue said sxecurJ hereby asks leave OF the said court
to ns such other aud supplementary inventory eShib-
ting such property the same may from time TO
time be found and received by the said executr&
Such a statement is not unusual. for in
large estate some pisces OF property are fre-
auently overlooked. An addition to this state
ment appears In the compiled appraisement
fled yesterday. and 10 aligned Jane L. STAN
ford by her attorney" 1t refers to the follow
ing personal property;
Three thousand two hundred and ATTY share, Atchi-
son. Topes. and santa rs Railroad stock; ii.2So
share. southern Pacific COMPANY stock; 1890 shares
swgGrt Ssws n an sRI ONO common .tooF
$40 as = shares Illinois central stock lpae bonds
IS Sohd. Ggs..Pssts and ohIo s;nstal ~ vs. cent
0onua
it per cent 5.iss- 6g.oss kentucky central trust
The said Jane L st,nfor. as .s.,uttSo Of tn. las,
p.c sna tie said property S not
OF me SSns rSs S,. 70 nsT 40 10
.s s h. ."lo S.onS. to the sssts o. Leland stan
ford deceased, and that she Is pToesedng with due
whole thsrssL
The report flied by. the appraisers tends to
strengthen the belief that DISPUTE + Eoins
Huntington over stocks and bonds belonging
TO the estate which have been retained In New
millions OF dollars. 1t is not improbable, in
Cotton suit. that the quarrel will be taken into
II is said that the reason why Huntington
has not put tho stocks and bonds into Mrs.
Stantords possession Is that In the recent H.
perienced. Huntington borrowed money on
them and that Il has been put out Of his power
lately to recover them, because he did not have
4 suggestive fact is that ex-Judge Spencer
OF San jose is now acting as Mrs stanford
the correspondence In which the pronerty 10
referred to be no longer withheld Wilson q
Wilson had been counsollors oil Mrs. STANFORD.
and they are still her attorneys OF record In
They signed tho inventory and sppreise-
ment Yesterday on her behalf Wilson X Will
son, however. are attorneys also for the South-
ern Pacific Company. and as such they could
not we'll act for Mrs stanford in the case II It
were necessary to enforce by judicial process
the recovery OF the bonds and stocks which
have been kept by the President OF the COM
pany. " >v,,
to b. n ominnlly at least, In possession OF the
company. and II suit were brought the compa-
ny would perhaps be made dsisn ond hs Vim,
Grdlev and Palo Alto property. which now
belong to stanford University, the late Sena-
tors whole estate is appraised nt $l7.OSS.3la
H