The times. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1890-1903, 1894-09-27
MGR. C0RRIGAN ACCUSED
PAMPHLET IN ROME CHARGING
CONSPIRACY AGAINST SAT0LLL
Cri,nmins anu tho Archbishop mi'haei
Walsh ssvs the Contractor Tried TO "e'
His Grace Influence.


The New York Herald OF yesterday says;
The statements OF Mgr. SatoHi' faP""tt
Ablegate 20 the United states, ana OF
Archbishop CJrTV6n, that thefe Is no
ground tor the report That they are TOY
on amiCablc terms with each othei' N'n
not be allowed to rest. when many
months ago the rumor became current
that charges had been preicritd III No'hV
against the head OF TINS Archdiocese, an
lc.lug tnat he had conspred TO de1eat
the objects OF the Papu AplcBdte lhc
Herald published the rumor for what II
was worm 80,
Subsequently, the Herald published Mgr
SItollts denial @. the truth Of the adt
tiouS. the Italian pTelatc addnG thal "e
regretted he could not bring 10 y"0l1n
the authors OF such Calumnies. IN NPI,t
18th the private secretary OF Nki' $40 a.
said 20 the Herald correspondents -
'Tncrc have been no charEes against
Archbishop Corigan filed ny any , U,'i
nor have amy been pIcSeh'tu "Et 80, So, no
I.egatc at Rome. MRr. Satohh hda ~
10 of tse manner In wnlcH thos" re
ports could have originated; a. uS i sT
Ions between himself ana ~ , ,,,,,,rnE
Corrisau are OF the most CORDIAL hn'".V
TEerc was published IN this city NtNt'f-
day. however an apparently cNHl'| a.
Rome AID presented a. the authorities
10 thr y ticlu containing spccihc ac-
cas.t.cr.. sustained 10y documentary ana
other evidence. asaiust His Grace.
v.,sa as >5eNAiyn
Tn. .rthcr statement is made that 'in
g.. ..ssl these charges are printed IN
l.'..r. tNt prclaCtI by history or inc
differences which preceded and succeeded
Nf.r ..I.t- appointment. There Is Tea-
SOL G. ..e,, tnut they were meant to
3. l. secret mi were drawn up hE
r...... Tire Signature 10 the alleged
i- omitted.
D. synopsis IN" name ot Michael
v... editor of the Sunday Democrat. is
lt. - 49,
-f. ..t.t furnished the documentary
... other evidence upon which the sup
posed charges against NEr Corrigan are
.HeI upon Mr.. Walsh yesterday
an. Pr. sal. he ha3 red the publ ca
tr nH' d'l not think IT worth while
answering. So far as ne was concerned
f ra~ false iu every particular. lie
r Gam Of TIE story as published. IL
l..I that the whole thing was con
,..t.l I'm New York.
"IEH0 you don't think there is such
81 phlet .n Home J. sad.
.IN..e might bc a printed BRIEF ne
replied. "rut IL WON Dirt be Kept very
secret But I have NOTHING 10 say; IT. is
for tee Arce'i.hop To- Sie3N', ~ re s WIN
"lt IS said YOU supplied Msr, SoIOln
with tre letters Of the Archbishop al
dressed % you?'
.rN-, u untrue There are the letters
i~ tr.t safe. and nobody has asked 10 sc
them N-r. satot never asked me ior
.n....r- - the kind"
",r .ur rerrc-cu,ative of the Abe
"No This tax about letters and docu-
Ir.vtS ar.se Iu this way. ! Wa eathe'-.
i.- material i.r history OF the Ncholi
Question. and wrote TO many prom .nent
persons l't 'ltN.I'T "i't r,aiar5
Archbishop Ireland said l was unht 10
write oa Sac. subject ales'ng, that /
was uou-p1rt-tu. ih"u 'Heicu TO lc.
llm write uu. volume from his own
standpoint q. prove Wy importantly, ana
De consented
v.fsu nv, .,,r.rrr yrfT
. .,,.., Nt,,,
Il d.I Nl-ie s. Nlt .A-"s It"''N.. .. -
S.t1ll. continued Mt. " aiSi' ~
bishop 'nifi.ah sent 10Y I"- ""' '.,
-" t.e Papa. Ab'-&ic "dS VI! NJ
about 10 snt -ifed 20 see me w,
900 appointment was made At At1h''Sn'p
'orr-.n~ house. I'f, la.l' inc ~,
gt'e- seer,. any H'd To a.' "H r .,',..,
prefer. hui ll'" - ttv'l I,'l M f
Latin than Pea. ''t -lSi' anu nv 49,
Sdiull ana j went AT u III -"
suppose "' H.'-I nave ".t' '.' ,ii,.
bishop COFFEE %. i'I we '''"
voices ., -. ,,..,,ll
'Iual.t A'r Sii'lu SAlI H' "'U'
present DIS fourteen pI'fo5 I'h- ~" IN
s.hop. questions i'm three sylloS'sls, a 'i
Inc idi.i "h. "-'lr S"-i l3 Va tt., I
WIN uif ~Npl@h"uohi anu 90, ,,,,l him
a. ,,'l ..,a.I,,n n" rr.ecltcd me with
his portrait which you see there,
III is ssll that You and Archbishop
Cou.Ean fell uut-are you not On E'.d
terwe3'
"Of course we are replied ME-. NatSH'
"but ] have not been subject 10 the &c
tatOn OF any one nj any. tii''V. '.N y
been f-7tM- for principle as l.II
Mn. SltuN / win tell Won this tp show
YOU that Archbishop CorriS1n could LOT
dictate 20 nae.
"Whcu William +. Shcchan was fhnhlhE
for the Office of Lleutendnl -'oE error l
attacked him m my paper. J"Hli ~ XIII
minis and others were hofIlIeI di li.'9,
and tried 10 stop me. Mr.. trmWlus Went
e. the Archbishop TO get MS IHHdtN'r
The Archbishop spoke 10 me ABOUT "'
Mr. Walsh again reverted TO Msi. ga
TOLL and his interview WIN MN '''
Catholic CLUB h'd lhNlt'I Na Il li,. ,.'.,....l
pew TO speak there, ana hai 5iSo 4HN ~,
Archbishop S1toiu to hear nm. Mr
Walsh said he was opposed 70 MT. ne
Dow. because the distinguished orator
rad spoken IN thlctt1 on INe V''a9''" W
the fair aealnst 13tH'ilrt'ft. =, 1,o,,er,-ae,.
After Mgr, Sdtolll VISIT 10 V,'- i'",' =
SIZE last year ne cum. ~ - a..
stayed with Archbishop OoIIl 6dil' 'll
Welsh said he went To the house ana.
tried 20 persuade the Iapu AnItT''v .g
10 20 10 the lecture. but lalr'' Nl1i.
bishop Corrigan dld not kno" ne W. az
the mousse uiti nv 80" '''''
Of Mgr. Sdtoih room.
1""'" ,,it.,,o,, COR
Il have Just WIluIeH 4" a. a., f,r,,t,i, hin
rigan. salq MT. aISi' 5,,t,, "a ar0iiain
that ! considered II iuS ~ dii,'t.,
him with the ldyt t'l't - iit,el aoains
my attorney 10 bl"'s 'iI. rnhlishes mi,
tht paper -.
slanatr @pou l,i,, IN was so much influence,
HlSI. ~ 4 i7sr ~ mai ne did not hest
by his partisan SPlIlI t'.,'' -. Nv o<cite Walsl