The Evening dispatch. [volume] (Provo, City, Utah) 1891-1895, 1894-10-17

NOTICE TO REDITORS-ES rATE OF
IN John Quigley, deceased. Notice is mere.
by given by the undersigned administrators OF
the estate of John Quigley, deceased,
to the creditors of, and all persons having
claims against the said deceased, to exhibit EXHIBIT
them V1th the necessary vouchers within
four months after the first publication OF this
notice at Payson, Utah.
RUTH L. QUIGLEY,
Administratrix of the estate OF John
Quigley deceased.
Dated this 22nd iav of Sept 1894.
COMMONS SIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
- the First Judicial District OF the Territ ory
of Utah. g tan county.
Elizabeth Blood, plaintiff. VS.. Orson Blood,
defendant
The people of the Territory of Utah send
greeting to OrSop Blood defendant
You are hereby required to appear in an
action brought against you by the above
named plRintif, in the District Court of the
First judicial District OF the Territory of
u Utah, and to answer the complaint filed there
in, within ten days, exclusive OF the day of
serVlcey after the service on you OF this sum-
mons-if served within this county; or, il
served out of this county, but in this district,
within twenty days; otherwise within forty
days-or judgment by default will be taken
against you, according to the prayer Of this
complaint.
The said acton is brought to obtaina decree
Ut this court dissolving the bonds of matri-
mony existing between plaintiff and defend
ant; that plaintiff be restored to All the rights
aid privileges OF an unmarried person; that
plaintis be awarded the custody of her minor
child. Robert Blood and that plaintiff be al
lowed to resume her maiden name of Eliza
beth Laird, and for cJsLs of suit herein and
for general relief Plaintiff alleges that she
was married to the defendant in the city of
Provo, county of Utah and territory of Utah,
on May 10, 1892; that her maiden name was
Elizabeth Laird; that an issue of said mar
riage son was born to plaintiff and defend
ant, to wit: Robert Blood now one year old;
that ever since said marriage plaintiff has been
q loving, oDedlent and OutiIul wife: but hat in
the month OF July, 1892 defendant deserted
plaintiff and has ever since said date absented
himself from plaintiff; that ever since said
July lSG: and during the time between said
marriage and said July 1892, defendant has
wholly talled to contribute to the support or
maintenance of plaintiff and eyer since the
date last aforesaid, plaintiff has been COM
PEELED to rely solely upon her own eXertions
for support and lIvihood.
For fuller and further particulars reference
is hereby made to the plainutf's complaint
now on file herein, copy of which is hereto
attached.
And you are hereby notified that if you fail
to appear and answer the said complaint as
above required, the said plaintiff viii apply
to the court for the relief therein demanded
and costs OF suit,
Witness the Hon. William H. King Judge
and the Seal of the District Court
OF the First Judicial District in and
(SEAL) for tho territory of Utah, this 10Th
day OF Sept, in the year OF our
Lord, one thousand eight hundred
and ninety-four.
j. w. BEAsLEY, Clerk,
By GEO. HAyERCAMP Deputy Clerk.
Warner and Knight, attorneys for plaintiff,