The Wheeling daily intelligencer. [volume] (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1865-1903, 1894-01-11

| GONE ones 49,
Enow Of the old man once trying &c q
na-t 81 Donglag Park Tor speculation
Another letter to the howe scare
/ Company was shown; 1t was repeL-
ton OF what was contained IN q iofNe1
- latter to { ~. Wheeler Il Co.. dated
Jnne y. witness said was the work OF
Afr. Bowler and himself
s letter to the aiming
Company, at 5louut Vernon, ONO, re-
eardinr their mstinginess" in adyertls-
no was called up By his noticing an
advertisement in the ISTELL1GEScER.
He had told James Reilly about The
-maIIuegs OF the advertisement A let
ter TO another milling company dateo
IJuly "a was shown; it Was suggested by
James Reilly. Witness did not know
that the old man Tas ordering a com
p~etitiye four when stopped by James
mir. Reilly would talk TO -four mill sales
men and get an idea that he ought to
buy, but would be persuaded out OF 1t
| by James
OTHER BUSINESS LETTERS
Other letters on business affairs con-
nected with the firm were shown; most
of them suggested By James Reilly 4
letter to Carnegie, Phipps & Co, was
| dictated to witness by Dir. Reilly after
Z conversation with James Reilly.
letter about shirts was shown, ana Alr-
Hubbard asked il this was not the
second original composition OF Michael
Reilly shown SO far. This question
was objected TO by Mr.. Russell Then
ensued a wrangle that hinged on legal
| practice. The objection was oyerrnled.
sWeIl. this is the second letter that
| I can recall attention to" said the wit
ness.
An agreement between Louis Zoeckler
and Michael Reilly. dated November 10,
1881. was submitted 1t was written
| By witness at the direction Of Mr..
Reilly. The Lease was Tor no certain
length OF time.
Aletter OF November 10 to ]. F. Bur
ley was suggested by a bill received
attention to the fact that his lots should
be filled up at Mounds7ille.
a letter to ". B. Stiles, Volcano, W.
Va; suggested by receipt OF check and
| notes from Stiles.
4 letter dated November 20, 1891, to
B. a Stevens; suggested by Luikert.
a letter of december 16, 1891: to z.
Rhinehalter & Company about his sons
monument was shown witness; James
Reilly suggested the text on the monu-
ment, and the letter was dictated by the
old man
a letter, Decembe: II, 1891, to the
Schmulbach Brewing Company regard
ing LEASES. was suggested and written
by the witness.
The next letter, dated December 81,
1891, was to a New Orleans molasses
firm, in answer to one received from
them it was thought the firm had been
cheated, and hat syrup instead OF mo-
lasses had been sent. This had been
told Ar. Reilly by Mr.. Jamison.
A letter to Nc5fasters & Co., Pitts.
burgh, dated in August, witness did not
remember about.
Another of date in August, 1891, to
the Hammondsport Wine Company,
| was shown it was about unstable
wine; suggested by Mr.. Buch.
Another letter to Stiles dated SePtem-
Der 25 was written by the witness him
| self. a letter TO a C~olumblana -four
firm was suggested by a travelling man.;
the firm at that time was agent for
other fours-
he DID Not KsoW.
AS to q subscription to the Union
Land Association, witness knew moth
ing OF it, and did not know that Bishop
kain or Father Sullivan had refused to
comply with a certain contract. as to
whether Mr.. Michael Reilly signed z
paper from Cummings d Co. while
!ame5 h3tl5 "1s eo a. ~ J;S Gt nnt 81 ~
a ~ eunmnoiee5 ne : ~. 49,.
It's 4s conci6uea Tug @
- ~. ts.':IeIi - te5stu ~ - ~
ter, witness repeated it was IN James
aa ~ III 81. pa;IFe 80 80
uials - ~ ..y, "ieiteTss 5 saiI =
we're suI!y c1a"n =; an ~ oeIA. No
ons oui 60 ~ ~ ! Wy he US
WING: Gsuet ,letSets. "Gulu oe u.c-
eaI9o ~ sups.ahce 70 tne %ltness:
UT a. LUIS pom. @sheo tnaS
ar. 5osePh pose plgsehs hls insurance
ce15lncate ~ o. lalieu 70 aPpear;
e1f. :. ~. ptocA1nieT vas calieo
came not; q ". T.. was
} AeAN SANsN5 Ne AANeNW SppeaK.
) Fly ENYsEE7.
( SfSaN0lSsSM SHAeA aDN hpsnNeD.
{ No mad 0aan enoaro3 IN maae cn5no
| IWeQEE-uVe III years. went ~ INTO