New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1894-07-28
INSTANT RELIEF
STING OF MOSQUITOES.
FROM
HEAT OF SUNBURN.
BE SURE TO GET GENUINE ARTICLE.

from the dnerential dry OF Is cent
| pound sugar the point OF order being tha' II
! Is not in order to give instructions in a luiI anu
| free conference"
| Mr.. Manderson Rep., Neb) argued against the
point Of order 1t was with the greatest hesitation
he said he spoke. because he realized that the
| President pro tempore of the Senate was paria-
| mcntarian of distinction. and that that distinction
! had been well earned But, while recognizing the
superiority of the presiding officer and his great
experience in parliamentary law. he realized just
as fully that his sense OF impartiay would prompt
| him 10 weigh with very great care any arguments
that might be presented bearing on the subject so
| important as this point OF order There could be
| no question that the motion as made by the Sena-
tor from Wisconsin (Mr. Vilas) that the senate
recede from the Il cent dfrerentia duty not
in order; but the motion Of the Senator from Mime
sofa 1Mr. Washburn) was very different one. IL
was that the Senate conferrccs be instructed 10 re-
cede from that amendment. He argued that the
Senate and the House had perfect right, under
the parliamentary law and under the practice OF
both bodies instruct Conference Committees. and
that such instruction was not an Interference with
full and free conference"
QUOTING MIR. REEDS DECISIONS
Among other authorities on that point. Mr. Man
derson quoted from Reeds Parliamentary Rules
10 the effect that conference might be free con-
ference although each house might have In
sructed its conferrees and that II is the right OF
In this connection Mr.. Henderson spoke Of Mr.
Reed paramentarian Of distinction and proml-
hence; as second man; man who. by
reason of his parliamentary action had been de-
clarcd TO be overbearing Car, and as one who
had exercised his will over the will OF the
House of Representatives. And yet. said Mr.
Henderson, we have the wisdom Of that
mans action in parliamentary matters ratified ~, an, ana
him down and 70 drive him from the chair which
Drifting away from ,echnlcalities Mr. henderson
declared that there was no use In mincng matters
was made because the striking out of the
Is cent diferental duty on sugar would defeat the
In It was involved the very life of the Sugar Trust,
which had been so elo9nenily denounced last III
his motion to recede from the Is cent pound df-
ferental.
ut is claimed Mr. Manderson continued. IN
this chamber and outside that that great and
powerful combination has tremendous power over
For no mater how near we come to the aefea
under feet. there is always found the one vote
The Bill and I aPprehend that Il viii be found SO
to-day.
HOW THE TRUST GETS THERE"
There Is always some IN ambush VINO comes
10 the front for the purpose Of saving the fe Of this
niQuity boldly denounced by the Senator from
Wisconsin. Tha, Senator has told us reasons for n"
withdrawal OF his motion Does he tel. US that he
has had further rght the subject. and tha; the
Trust .s not back az he painted III No. Does
he tell tina, upon further reflection he has changed
his mind. and that he believes that tina; measure Of
protection 20 the refining industries should he main
tanned? No Manfuliy. perhaps land yet | doubt
somewha, whether that is proper term 20 use)
frankly AT Least; Re came to the front and SAID
No. stu believe and the great mass ~ the
American people believe. that this stigma a
proach TO Congress. But the party lash has been
applied 10 my back have been told that must
,Hif u irqu nv mn hat "A " n
draw the motion Of which am really much In
favor
And now" said Mr.. Manlerson In closing. That
We have presented parliamentary method o; getting
ria OF this extraordinary duty shall expect TIE
Senator from Wisconsin and others wAo asree with
him 10 come 70 support and strike from the
Tariff bill this obnoxious feature. even II by doing
50 We destroy the bill which Senators Themselves
say nobody. either In the Senate House. Is In
favor Of We have voted here under tie threat
that II this dNerontal one-eghth is keep, in the
bill there shall be tariY legislation. That is The
Plain proposition here. and !, may jus well be
understood first as last II the Chair shah
the point Of order, and II that ruling Shall be ap
pealed from vote 10 sustain that decision - as
directly vote IN favor Of retaining this dnerentia
one-e!ghth though that alone the question
involved"
Mr. Plat Rep. Comm submitted argument
against the point OF order prove that the rulings
Of each house almost Invariably recognized the
right OF each house TO instruct It's conferrees.
SENATOR HARRISs RULING
The presiding officer Mr. Harrls) then made his
ruling on the point Of order. He said:
The Senate having adopted SOM coo amendmen's
to the House and the House. having non concurred
In those amendments. has sent to the Senate
ing further conference on The dlssgreeng votes
a5S S S6naie has esss lis uagmeg
ments by adopting Thorn The House has. pfesuma
these amendments ana in i,s nsstence on ;ha, non
concurrence has asked further conference All con
agreeing votes are Intended 10 be fun AMI free
Completes of conference are appointed because Of
and adjusting The differing and conG,ctjne opni5ns
OF the two houses. And whenever either house shall
instruct rs conferrees in relation to one more OF
and absouN dsoy tse edm Of ' iha eSs
ference.
need not discuss the broad question Of the power
of the Senate instruct conierrees for that ques-
ton is necessarily involved in the point OF or
Senator moved that the Senate insist upon IT'S
amendments and grant the conference asked by the
House. The Senator from Minnesota (Mr Wash
burn) moved as an appointment to that motion that
the Senate amendments. That motion involves and
whether the Senate can do by ndirecon that which
no one contends it has the power to do directly
Senate at this stage Of the procedure. Neither
house having the power in It's Individual capacity
ceding from distinctive and complete propositions
the Chair does hesitate that the failure
the part OF either house TO instruct deprives
neither house Of any one Of It's The power Of
each house is absolute ana complete over the
whole subject matter In the absence Of instructions
IT could be with them; because whatever the
Conference Committee may report whether
agreement in full partial agreement a general
dIsaeeement-that action must be agreed TO By
each house before II can become effective. Every
phase and feature OF the conference report
on this bill will be submitted the Senate for its
action: and the Senate agree or disagree 10 the
report. which can never become effective until the
Senate has agreed n. SO that not the smallest
particle OF the power of the Senate the subject
matters involved In this disagreement Is impaired
lost. whether the Senate can Instruct or not in
struct.
But, believing. the present occupant OF the
chair believes that the Senate cannot directly
amorl any ono Of the amendments which now con-