The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1894-06-17
SUMMONS.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND
for the Third judicial district Of Utah ter
rritorE, county Of Salt Lake 3;,.,, Mrs. GeoTse
w. Stern, plaintiff, vs. William Burke,
Mary L. Burke Catherine r.. LIVER, Aaron
Keyser. William. S Mccormick. Mary
BriXen. the National Bank of the Re-
public of salt Lake city, a corporation,
Union National bank, OF salt Lake city.
a corporation, Edward 3. Wicks, trustee
for II. b. Scott, # Il. Scott, and NJ B.
BufoTd, J. ". Taylor and George CroCEer.
doing business under the firm name OF
Promontory Stock company, defendants--
The people of the territory of Utah
send greeting: To William Burke, Mary
L. Burke, Catherine z. Dyer. Aaron Key
ser, WilliaIa 5. Mccormick, Mary Brixen
the National Bank Of the Republic, OF
Salt Lake city, a corporation. Union Ma
tional Bank, of Salt Lake city, a corpora
ton, Edward b Wicks, trustee for II.
Is. Scott, H. B. Scott and N. T. Buford.
J. w. Taylor and George Croker, doing
business under the hrm name Of Promon-
tory Stock company. defendants
You are hereby required to appear in
an action brought against you by The
above named pIaintif in the district court
of the Third judicial district OF the terri
tory of Utah, and to answer the complaint
filed therein within ten days Exclusive Of
The day of seryice) after the service on
YOU of this sumnons-m served within
this county. or. if served out Of his
counts, but in this district within twenty
DAYS: otherwise within forty days-Or
Judgment by default viii be taken against
you, according to the prayer of said COM
p+ The said action is brought to have judg-
ment against defendants Burke IN the
sum of $4,000, gold COIN of the United
states with interest at 80 Der annum
from Dec 25 1892 for further sums as
taxes paid by plaintiff, towit, 1924. with
interest at go per annum from Sep Is,
lSg3; S22L72, with interest at 81 per an
mum from Feb 10, 1891; SCOT, with inter-
est a ga per annum from May p, 1894.
for 81 900 attorneys fees. and costs OF
suit: alleged TO be due on a certain prom
issoTy note, executed by defendants Burke
S15 900 with interest from date at go per
annun same being due and wholly uI-
paid save interest TO Dec ., 1892, and
being secured by mortgage on prer1-
ises bereinaf ter described, executed by
defendants Eurke to said Pepper, June 81
1891 said note and mortgage having been
d11IV assigned to plaintiff, who is now the
holder thereof to have the usual decree
: If This court for the foreclosure of said
mortgage adjudging that said premises
be sold and proceeds applied in payment
| of accounts due as above; that defendants
/ and All persons claiming under them be-
! barred and foreclosed of al claim or.
I equity of redemption in said premises I:
( that plaintiff have judgment against de-
fandants Burke for any deficiency; that
a receiver be appointed by this court to
take charge OF said prODeTty-and for
other relief; said premises are described
a { follows: Commencing at the southwest
corner of lot 8, block Of. plat a. Salt
Lake city survey, running thence east
125 feet: thence north l32 feet; Themes
west 125 feet; thence south l32 feet to be-
ginning, situate in Salt Lake city and
and YOU are hereby notified that il
YOU fail to appear and answer the said
Complaint as above required, the said
pIaintiff will apply to the court for the
relief demanded therein.
Witness the Hon. Samuel 4. Merritt.
Judge, and the seal of the district
court of the Third judicial district,
TSealI in and for the territory of Utah.
this 2d day of June, in the year OF
/ our Lord. one thousand eight hum
I bred and ninety-four.
DAVID z. DUNBAR,
j By. GEO. D. LOOMS. Clerk
\ Deputy Clerk.
Marshall & Royle. attorneys for plain-
tiff