Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1894-03-22

to see the portions to be left out Mr.. Car
Isle explained that these We're the portions
brought out by the examination in chief
which Judge Bradley had ruled out this
morning. When the deposition was taken
1t was before a commissioner who had no
right TO exclude testimony or pass upon OBJ
jections. These portions, Mr.. Carlisle stated
would act as a waiver of objections made
this morning. Mr.. Stoll urged that this
part of the deposition be submitted to the
court
Gladly" said Mr. Carlisle mot only
because have to submit. but because l like
to-"
Judge Bradley sustained Mr.. Carlisle in
his contention with the understanding that
as some of the testimony seemed u be
proper il might he read by the defense II
they saw fit. Neither SIDE could De com
PEELED by the court to read any PORTION OF
a deposition, but the other side might IN
sist On its right 20 read it as its own.
Miss Pollard Popular at school.
The deposition then went on to- deal with
the methods pursued in the business If the
Institution to show how AMI by whom
Contracts We're made with students. Miss
Pollard was one of the popular girls at The
school There were forty or fifty scholars
and they were allowed to see callers on
Friday evenings ard occasionally there
were formal receptions. He could not recol-
lee. that Miss Pollard had sent out invita-
tons to any Of these, but presumed STE
did, and also that she received callers on
other evenings. Mr.. Breckenridge made only
two calls and they were on the same faE.
She went out with him that evening ami
returned at reasonable hour. If she
had not he would have known Of il.
Miss Pollard. deponent continued. was on
intimate terms with his sister, Miss WeSsie
Brown, and her relations toward the rest
of the family were of the most pleasant
character.
vniutercstinr Detail.
A great deal of time was spent in Gecid-
ing whether various parts of the deposition
should be read by one side or the other, or
whether they could properly be read at ali.
Inasmuch as the testimony when read was
with reference to detail of life at Wesleyan
College. 1t was of comparatively little III
terest to the audience, and even the july
did not seem to care whether 1t was read or
not. AS whole the afternoon rather drag
ged.
Deponent only remembered one occasion
when Miss Pollard was absent from the
that she was not away for any great length
of time.
The deponent said that he never knew Of
Miss Pollard wearing glasses. Nor did he
ever know of a telegram coming t. the
school for her. He considered her a we'll
disposed girl, ladylike. well capable of TAX
ing care of herself, and perfectly well able
to withstand improper advances from the
other sex.
we object. your honor said Mr.. Will
son, ito that answer"
Yes" remarked Judge Bradley; "it is in
the nature of expert testimony"
DIR. Williams Deposition.
That concluded the deposition of Mr..
Brown, and Mr.. Stoll then announced that
he would now read the deposition Of Or.
L. +. Williams of Frankfort, Ky.
Mr. Carlisle objected to the deposition on
the ground that 1T was immdterial.
THE party does not know anything, any
way" explained Mr.. Wilson.
We'll then" remarked Mr.. Stoll, 1T cam
not hurt anybody"
The deposition was handed 20 Judge Brad
ley for his perusal. He thought II might be
read. Mr.. Stoll then proceeded to read ii.
The deponent stated that he attended tIe
plaintiffs mother at the birth of a dadSh-
ter in October or November, 1888 There
was then little girl called Matte" about
three years old. He was unable, however,
to state that the plaintiff was the child
Matte