Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1894-04-03


MS my means would allow and giving
legal advice when 1t was wanted.
have no recollection OF ever addressing
presoytery or synod. never was
an officer OF the church. IN 1sSS. at the
Centennial meeting in Philadelphia.
addressed the meeting on celvinism
and religious freedom"
Have you taken an active interest
In Sunday-school work."
Il have never been teacher since
I left the Confederate army. 1t de-
ponds on what you mean by an active
interest"
Have you featured before Young la
dies seminaries% asked AR wilson,
Il have addressed schooiF, lcchmcd
and delivered dtpioiMs at the time"
You We're In public reception at
the Norwood Institute in this city,
oh yes"
Therenpon Mr. Wilson handed up to
the colonel and requested him TO read
an Invitation which he had sent to Miss
foliArd III February, 1898, requesting
the pleasure OF her company at TO-
eeption to the Hon w c. p. Brecltn-
ridge at Norwood Institute which he
read. BY questions concerning the
eoloners residence Ia Lexington In 1854,
Mr. Wilson elected the information
that MS home was on the same street
with the house of Sarah Guess, four
blocks away Then he asked;
How long have you known Sarah
Guess2' to which Col breckenridge
80,
- va" say' perhaps twenty
80 ~,
- you Ni'o" inc character OF her
iv1'
~ uiu, !.
-, 4u 49,, ~ e,er pee' mere peiore you
o ..1 WV, 'i'e pie'i'''"
nr,aa ,
" n u','iers''''u 'i'ht before you
rnou,n g., -. 'u ''"u io' 'surS
nctor ~ A., 49,, 80 81. N,5Wu ''e e',aI-
and had been there before vou Won't
with the plalnumg,
Each Of those statements nre true 4"
Turning to the letter nroduced NV Tho
defense. and purporting to have come
from Miss Pollard. MIR. Wilson nsl,ed
where the envelope was and Mr.. Rrecl,-
inridge replied IL had been lost. II
was his general custom to preserve nh
his letters. but the nrst letter from the
plaintiff ne could not find.
You have received great many let
tiers from her?"
81 have"
And YOU are able only ia proauca or
all Of them what ls called mis- wooden
or dummy letter?r
81 do not admit that II was n dummy
letter. I have not said SO. After the
relations which grew up between Tho
plaintiff and myself on the 1st Of Aug
ust. 1884. I did not want TO preserve
the letters because Of many references
In them"
"You have received many kilograms
from the plainun?"
81 never was in the habit OF pro-
serving kilograms
80 that OF all your correspondence
with the plaintiff. extending over nine
venrs. Won hive oniv this letteron
ut seems so.n
Mr.. win ON requested n snocioc no.
conrt os ,u Nc, pou.rd ha1 .at1
a,,rtn,. 10 ers, ,.,,,, 80 ~, t,..,,.i.,
49, 80 ,ha Iv..,a,.a,, .a,,,..'.,, IA
~, ,,..-'.,..'. 80 '' ''' $3.50, .',,
no - -" 1a s',, U's,e,'''
w V'ioi5i uv'Si"b wa. 'i's' io''a'u
nau sun y. was port Oh ier agreement
win NhooeS 10 repay lhe money ne
had advanced Tor her sehoolng II she
did not marry him' but explained that
| she had asked II 1t would not be all
right II she repaid the money. In his
most pathetic tones the colonel repeat
edl ali the details Of the interview, how
she had insisted upon telling him all.
and he had demonstrated that there
was things she probably dld not want
20 saw 20 s,rarger ndvlaing ber "a
10 - ner erandsa,rer motber or
~
,,,, D., ,.-,-. l., -,
w ,, - avn ''i'l,sss'o'' ~ n's n', ~.
ory al'''outu e"',''o' e.,'e,'"ei ~
lanEuuEe, aleol zen 49,, ye,s's, t,se s'is , ,
given MN even a niEher PROOF OF her