The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1894-12-07
CALENDAR FOR DEC. 8.
The calendar OF the Supreme Court for
Saturday is as follows:
Commou Plaza Division.
assigned Cases,


956. G. A. Hicks ct ux., ct al, VS.. Henry
r. Teel ct al, executors. Attorneys
McGuinness * Doran for plaintiff; Ed
wards q Angel for defendant.
670. Thomas w. Waterman vs.. Bernard
McCulla. Attorneys--Van Slyck and
Mumford for plaintiff; Page d Owen for
defendant.
6ss3. John Sullivan, administrator, VS..
N. ", N. III. & H. Railroad Company.
Attorneys--Page * Owen for plaintiff; j.
NJ. Ripley for defendant.
1928 Magnolia Metal Company VS.. A.
b. Pitkn Manufacturing Company. At
torneys-J. II. Blodgett for plaintiff; :. 3.
Lapham for defendant.
SIS. James l.. Fay VS.. Michael j. Sat-
terry. Attorneys---J. w. Hogan for plain
tiff; j. Nj. Brennan for defe ndant.
III. Zelotes w. Holden ct al. VS.. Seth
w. Wells. Attorneys-C Il. Salisbury and
Cooke and Angel FOR plaintiff; James
Williams, r and T. f. Tillinghast for de-
66Ol. Charles f. Brown et ux. VS.. w. G.
Smith, administrator. Attornevs-Page
& Owen for plaintiff; b. NJ. Bosworth for
defendant.
1856. John A. Congdon VS.. Michael J.
Slattery. Attorneys-J. w. Hogan for
plaintiff; j. NJ. Brennan for defendant.
1855. Mary A. Reilly VS.. Hugh j. Smith
ct al. executors. Attorneys-W. III. Greene
for plaintiff; p. j. Mccarthy for defend
ant.
fMotions.I
1862. Carlo Lafatzia VS.. VIM. A. Carroll.
Attorneys-G. Farrell for plaintiff; Q. M.
Lee for defendant
1904. Thomas Hanley VS.. George II.
Herr. Attorneys-H. F. Thompson for
plaintiff; Smith & Greenough for defend
ant.
1888. Michael Quinn, appellant, VS.. John
Ear Aft0rnAVg-MC-
Guinness & Dorsn for plaintiff; Lee 81
Tillipghast for defendant.
69l. Anne McGinty, appellant, VS..
Sarah McGinty, administrators. Attorneys
"A. r. Greene for plaintiff; S. w. K.Allen
for defendant.
1928. Presbrey and Myrick vs.. John w.
Fields, appellant. Attorneys-D. w.
Frick for plaintiff; III. A. McKenney for
defendant.
-. Elmer b. Jacobs VS.. Henry A.
Kirby. Attorneys-A. j. Cushing for
plaintiff; j. NJ. Ripley for defendant.
1856. Richard Waterhouse VS.. Black
stone Woolen Company. Attorneys
Bosworth & Jenckes for plaintiff; Tilling-
hasts for defendant.
1860. Witteman Brothers VS.. The Ftna
Stopper Company. Attorneys - Farms
worth for plaintiff; j. l.. Jencks for de-
9Ss. William II. Earle VS.. Providence
Telephone Company. Attorneys. q.
Mowry for plaintiff; Bakers for plaintiff
751. Henry c. Hoffman VS.. James t..
Jordan. Attornsys-H. A. McKenney for
plaintiff; Page and Owen for defendant.
torneys-Same as in 752.
1920. Frederick Oates ct ux. VS.. New
port street Railway Company. Attorneys
Bakers for plaintiff; w. q. Rocker for
defendant.
-. stephen Wright VS.. Harris Lime
Rock Company. Attorneys-Psge & Owen
1859. James j. Nolan VS.. Patrick
Fogarty. Attorneys-P. G.. Mccarthy for
plaintiff; - for defendant.
1925. Daniel ID. Dwyer VS.. Ludger
Gemme. Attorneys. Il. Murphy for
plaintiff; j. +. Goldsworthy for defend
ant.
[Appella'e Division.I
3103 (equity). Rosanns Hannigan VS..
James Gallagher, ct ux. Attorneys-G. }.
West for plaintiff; McGuinness and Doran
for defendant.
1890 tequity). Congregation Agudath
Haccollol vs. Harris Goldberg. Attor-
neys--D. W. Fink for plaintiff; f. A.
Wildes for defendant.
2anl -lepnityl. Ehes G. Tbaxter VS..
Francis u. Turner. Attorneys-D. b. Pot-
ter for plaintiff; - for defendant.
1888 (equity). Hanrahan & Lilly VS..
Owen McCusker. Attorneys-Bas IL
Mitchell for plaintiff; - for defendant.
1906 equity. James Healey VS.. John
OConnor ct al. AttorneysEP. J. Quinn
and j. K. Lonsdale for plaintiff; p. Ii.
Mulholland, Bsssett and Mitchell for de-
fendant.
1855 equity. William II. Parker VS..
York & New England Railroad Company.
Attorneys-Page & Owen for plaintiff; j.
NJ Ripley for defendant.
1888 (equity). Edgar A. Bennett VS.. q.
ri. Cahoone q Co. Attorneys-Page &
Owen for plaintiff; Van slyck q Mumford
for defendant.
1920. Frederick G. Hull ct al. VS..
George Il. Hull ct nj. Attorneys-Page 81
owen and @. "a. Johnson for
plaintiff Van Slyck a. Mumford for de-
fendsnt.
1857 (exceptions). George II. Jordan
VS.. Pardon S. Pecleham. Altorneys-Page
& owen for plaintiff; +. X. Parker for de-
fendant.
$500. Joseph Is. Wilson vs.. Amasa Il.
Eddy. Attorneys-D. j. Holland, j. NJ.
Brennan for plaintiff; S. s. Lapham for
George Il. johnson declined to accept
~. ~ nj ton ~g sk.