Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1894-07-27

bIlElNNns
In tho case Of Joseph u. Toronto VI
Salt Lake CitY the judgment Of the
lower court Third districi) was AZ
flrmeI with costs 10 respondent.
OGDEN Paint, Oh anu dlsnn company
W Warren q. Child ct al. judgment
Of the lower court, (Foufth district)
reverend with costs, with directions t.
dismiss respondents bill.
Mexican International Banking Co,
W Henry Lichteustein, defendant AMI
appellant rhird distrlct.l Order OF
the court below granting new trial
reversed anu the cause remaudcd Tor
dismissal Of the aotiOn.
l.. W. Bacon " John II. McChtys-
tai ct al, appellants. Judgment n the
court below (rhird dislfloO Affirmed
with costs.
Joseph Rufisli W sooleto Anoryme
dts Mines dc Lexington, defendant
and appellant Judgment affirmed
with costs 10 respondent
Julian Riley " Sal, Lake Rauid
rfansit Co., appyllsnts. The court
thought the verdict II, 80, 900 exceeded
by 81 1000 the amount winch plainuH
was shown 10 be entitled to a. dam
ages. Unless, therefore, plainiil con-
sentcd TO such reduction. the iudg.
ment Of tho lower court 90 be- re-
yetsci. Otherwise 90 stand affirmed.
Crawford W Sessions Affirmed.
Boyd PARA " T.. IL. Panono VI al,
appellants. Judgment and order ap.
pea.cd from affirmed, with costs to
respondent.
William II. whitshill, plaintiff ana
appellant, W George a. Moan et nj.
Judgment Of tue Third district court
M tmeI with costs,
A. i. Lawson, plsinlin aud re-
spondent, Va Alfred THOMPSON. Judg-
ment Of the lnlrd district courtstllimeI
leTein also,
Harriet futile Drake ct a., appel
lants, va Rachel Reygul ct al. Juig-
ment " the Third district court again
ALI rmUd.
sp1ngville city, plaiutIn and 70.
spouJent, Va Don T.. johnson. This
wss question VI taxation as 10 certain
ands. Jud mu Of tho lower court
Fiat distrioIJ piiirmej.
Jeus Olsen, plmnul and respondent,
W Hyrum Baqgy, Judgment Tor
plaintiff In the lower court affirmed
" tn costs.
L.. h. Chamberln, appellant, vs w.
W. Waters sud Ogden CITY board OF
education. Judgment Of lower court
lillfmed.
rhomas Cuplt vs. Park City
Bank, Defendant and respondent
| Third distinctly judgment Of tue
/ lower court iissUivlGg auu uischhrglng
| tho attachment set aside anu the cause
remanded Tor further proceedings,
W. l., BuTrJWa ct ali rerpnnusntsi
| Va Oliver q. litmball et al lFitst dis
ltcl.) Judgment Of the cout. urloW re-
| versed anu "A new tflal HNulnIi ON tht
ground that the Territorial Legislature
has no rlgnt 10 pass tue law glvlng
| authority 20 The county court 70 lease
sections 10 ana 80, reserved 10y thr
| United states Tor CJmmou school put-
poses, a. well o. upon tue ground that
| The lease m ID by cue county court 81
Emery county 90 plainI'u wa, lhVi,l -,
even had the statute pA7sru In loe3
| been valid.
and respoudenf, W CuAs. sheets auu
r. ". PAftrdgr. Judgment Of Third
district court affirmed with costs.
RaTtnu BrD.., apprllants, " South
.IorJa. Coon Mercantile, etc., institu.
lion. judgment oi the lower couf1
affirmed.
Others opinious were given II Is
seldom that such a he'vy batch j.
handed Town Rt one Jays ne'blou'
ADMITTED no 1iE BAR.
Tbe examining committee reported
nyerably on the following candidate,
,o, rImis.I0p, ana they were "Ar.
neniedn: Mgssrs. Arthur y. Wiioheg,
Jsrtert o. Townsend, Heary Shi0lds
ana b, q. M0sby' .,- u
August 3lst, At p'm'