The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1894-06-10

Puget Sound National Bank vs. Samuel
Levy et al.-Motson for order OF sale: con-
unued until June IL
L. May ct al. vs.. Baxter ct al.-Stricken
from trial calendar.
Ballard vs.. First National Bank of
slaughter-Continned until June 25
Mics vs. z. C. Miles CompAny-Payment
OF back salaries; ordered
Spencer va Colweil ct al--0rder of de-
fault
Haddor vs. Kent Mil Company ct al
Judgment: signed.
Schultz VS.. Borst ct sl--Findings Of
fact, conclusions Of law and decree.
Pacific Manufacturing Company vs..
Brown ct al.-ReceIver directed 10 pay
COSTS.
State OF Washington ex rel John r. Mil
Ter Va Arnes-Set for hearing June Is.
LsttelI VS.. Henry et al.-Demurrer Of Se-
attic Trust Company TO cross-complaint OF
Henry; continued one weak
Moore et al. vs. Palmer ct al--Demurrers
70 second amended petition: Withdrawn.
Comstock VS.. EpIer et al.-Detendant's
motion 70 dismiss for want OF prosecution |;
withdrawn; leave 10 tiie amended answer.
Davis Bros. VS.. Mackay ct sl.-Deiend-
ants motion TO strike; continued two
weeks.
Cox vs.. Farwell--Motion TO dismiss and
quash writ of certiorari; continued two
weeks
Robbins W.. snipes ct al.-Defendants'
demurrer to complaint; submitted.
kteier ct al. We. Eryberg ct al--Defend-
ants demurrer to complaint; continued
one week
Nelson vs. West Shore Land Company
ct al-Demurrer OF West Shore Land
Company aud Harry White & Co. TO CON-
plant Of plaintiff; waived; ten days 10
answer.
E-a...... .r:st.- -. ~
al.-Demurrer of Defendant Brown 10
complaint; overruied Tor want Of prosecu-
ton.
Clark VS.. Uhlman ct ux.-Demurrer of
defendant; overruied in par. aud sus-
tanned in part: five days to answer.
McKinlay VS.. Treen ct aI.-Motion for
appointment of receiver; continued one
week
Kenney VS.. whippls ct al-Defendant
Spooner's motion 20 quash summons; de-
MED.
Krutz VS.. whippie ct al-Defendant
Spooner's motion TO quash summons; de-
MED.
Dearborn ct al. VS.. Washington Savings
Bank-Motion and petition Tor receiver 10
pay taxes; submitted.
Wheeler VS.. Moore ct ai.-Motion of
Moore Investment and Manufacturing
Company 10 correct record and strike; sub
mitted.
Baldwin VS.. Baer et aL-Motion of De-
PENDANTS Surber and Egan for new trial !;
continued one week.
Capecci VS.. AlIadio-Receiyer's report
and account; approved
Bond VS.. McLachlan and Winsor, inter-
venor-Motion to strike interyenor's COM
paint; denied; motion for bill Of particu-
lars. denied.
Dalton Bros. vs. Jackson & Arper-De-
murrer TO complaint; waived.
CRIMINAL DEPARrnESr-HUNEs.J J.
Faust VS.. Lander-Motion to retax
costs; denied.
Jackson VS.. NJ A. and f. Schwab-Mo-
ton of plaintiff for new trial: granted.
Bank of British Columbia VS.. Boston
National Bank ct ai.-Settlement of state
merit of facts; continued by request.
Commercial National Bank VS.. Barnes
Stricken.
Guyer ct al. VS.. Rrawley ct al.-Demyr-
rer to complaint; oyerruled.
Fortlouis ct al. VS.. Bromley-Motion for
new trial; continued.
Allen, assignee. vs. Egbert-Motion to
dismiss appeal; granted.
Yesler Wood, Coal and Lumber COM
pany VS.. Bothell Bros.-Defendant's mo-
ton for a new trial. denied.
Magnus ct al. vs. Hart ct ai.-Continued.
Lord VS.. Woolery-Motion for new trial;
denied.
McDougail VS.. House of Good Shep-
herd-Motion 10 make definite and GER
tain waived.
Merchants National bank vs. REESE
dorpb-Plaintiff7s motion for default; de-