Evening journal., 1894-02-05

J
features OF the morning
1t is Understood that the case Of the
STATE VS.. Edwin r. Banks. of stanton,
for assault upon Postmaster Charles
Schwendeman has been settled, Banks
paying the fue aud costs. imposed by
Magistrate Richardson.
The Trial List Gone over.
Immediately after the retirement of
the grand jury the trial list OF the
Superior Court was taken up and gone
over for the purpose OF preparing the
trial calendar This occupied the time
until the noon recess.
The Maxwell Case Again.
Levi c. Bird and Peter L. Cooper, Jr.
asked for a retrial Of the Maxwell case at
i this term.
Messrs. Bradford and .Biggs said that
such demand was unreasonable as they
had other cases to try They did not know
that the universe hinged upon decision
in the case, but were perfectly willing
that 1t should go over to the May term
with peremptory rule for trial
Mr. Bird said that he had right to a
retrial this term and he demanded II.
The court decided that the case should
/ 60 to the foot of the list, and IL time per
mitted, be tried at this term, which is
scarcely likely.
True Bills Quickly Found.
The grand jury found true bills against
Charles w. Laws Charles Oumpson and
Leroy Turpin, charged with carrying
concealed deadly weapons.
Favorable to Divorce.
Ex-Mayor Harrington asked for publi-
cation Of the award Of Commissioner
Samuel A Macalister in the divorce
case Of Mary E vs.. James f Cotton.
1t was granted. Mr. Harring
ton represented the petitioner aud
William S. Hilles the respondent. The
decree was granted on the ground Of
desertion.
Chief Justice Lore announced that
civil business would be taken up on
Monday.
What the Trial List Shows.
The cases set Tor trial are as follows
| jeremiah Harrigan W. the Farmers
Mutual Fire Insurance Company; Parkins,
administrator: VS. Ida Carr Wilson
Moore Compang; John Doe vs.. James Q
Dulon, Patrick Fahey, and w. 7. Mott
Catharine Bieble VS. p. w. & B. Rail.
road Company; Charles F. Taylor vs. the
same; Maxwell VS.. Wilmington City
Railway Company jacob l. Stumpf W.
Augusta BioktR; Kalamazoo National
Bank VS. Charles NJ. Newlin; james +
Reilly VS. the P w. & Railroad
Company; Susan B CLARK vs.J. Car
penter, Jr. same vs. the Mayor and Council
of Wilmington; William f. LoDg5svs.
John j. Smith Cornelius Lynch VS.
Thomas Grier; Edward Henry vs. w
H. II. Clark. constable Sarah S Batson
VS. the P w & B. Railroad Company
William NJ. Stucke vs.. the Diamond
State Iron Company; George w
| Wigglesworth VS. the Wilmington City
Railway Company Russell Craig's ad
ministratOr VS.. the p, W. & B. Railroad
Company; John johnson vs., the same
Maryina Wulinska VS.. the same; J. Hooc
Wright VS. the Wilmington Dental Manu-
featuring Company, George A. LsMaistr'
and Frank G. Oorbit, garnishees of Henr,
3 @. Robinson (the other cases being con.
tinued) BsDjamin Mills VS. the Whining
ton City Railway Company; Catharini
? Morrison vs. Frederick w. harrison
Bennett F. Rutter vs. Lydia A Springer
ct. al James H. Wilson vs.
Samuel Harlan's executor; Jsmel
+ Wood & Co. VS.. w. jerks Fell
trustee; w. w. Chandler. d. b a VS.
John Fullmer, p. b. r. James a. Hyn
son VS. the jackson and Sharp Company
Joseph l. Ocheltree, d. b. a., VS.. Lovel
Brothers p. b. T David Coverdale VS.
, William Mayne
Referred-James A. Wilson VS. Isaa,
, R Brown. ct al Charles E, Jenkins VS.
Isaac r. Brown, ct al Joseph L
Lavender vs.. E. T. Bye, garnishe'
of w. P. Taggart Sherwin & sor
! d. b. VS., j. H. Tuick & Co., p. b. r.
J William Moland & Sons. p. b. a VS. Johl
j ID. Ward. d. b r. Hannah Hollings
worth, ct al, VS. Howard H Jordan.
observation-disclosures Stroud VS.. tn
Mayor and Council Of WILMINGTON; Johl
Jaeoby vs. the B & o Railroad Company
D Adelina ShoclJley VS.. the Mutual b. L
, Association; Hood, Foulkrod & Co. VS.
. Pierce Gould. sheriff; Frank Toomey, d
81 b. a., VS. NJ T. Reybold p b. T.
Settled Marshallton Iron Works VS.
Henry Barker
Three Sentenced This Afternoon,
Immediately after court reconvenei
3 this afternoon, the following negro pris
+ oners were sentenced for carrying con
! cealed a deadly weapon:
Charles w. Laws, thirty days ant
= costs; Charles Dumpson, fifteen days an'
? costs; Leroy Turpin, ten days and costs
I Retta Burnight, prosecuting witnes
4 against DR. Cameron, was brought t.
! the Court House this afternoon to tes-
a tify before the grand jury.
s Chief Justice Lore Colonel Benja
!. Nields and h. Il. Ward are at work ar
ranging the trial calendar.