The Washington times., 1894-11-20
RECORD OF THE COURTS.

hLAOhb vi AOI y.
SUPREME CoURT OF THE UNITED STATES.
Monday, November 10, 1894 Present: The
Chief Justice. Mr. Justice Field. Mr.. Justice
Harlan, Mr.. Justice Gray. Mr. Justice Brewer.
Mr.. Justice Brown, Mr.. Justice Shiras, and
Mr.. Justice White.
Charles W. Smith. of Indianapolis, Ind.
John J. A. Powell, of WytheviIle. Va: p. H.
Gadsden, OF Charleston, s. c.. and William
L. Martin, of Montgomery. Ala. were ad-
mitted TO practice.
No. 622 The United States, appellant. vs..
Johnson Blackfeather, principal chief Of the
Shawnee Indians. Appeal from the Court OF
Claims. Judgein ent reversed and cause re-
manded with directions to recompute the
amount due the claimants in conformity with
the opinoin Of this court. Opinion by Mr.. JUS
tice Brown.
No. 61g The United States and the Chero-
kee Nation, appellants. VS.. Charles Journey
cake, principal chief Of ths Delaware Indians.
Appeal from the Court Of Claims. Judg-
ment affirmed. Opinion by Mr.. Justice
Brewer.
No. 671. The United States and the Chero-
kee Nation, appellants, VS.. Johnson Black
feather, principal chief Of the Shawnee In
dians. Appeal from the Court Of Claims.
Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Mr.. Justice
Brewer.
No. 4. John J. schininger ct al, appellants,
w. lIlt Ouileu OldLtS- Appbdi IRON the lOuEL
OF Claims Judgment afnrmed. Opinion by
Mr.. Justice Brewer. Dissenting, Mr.. Justice
Harlan and Mr.. Justice sairas
No. 633. The Pittsburg, Cincinnati and
st. Louis Railway Company et al. appellants
VS.. the Keokuk and Hamilton Bridge Com
pany; on a certificate from the United States
circuit court OF appeals for the Seventh cir
cult; second question certified answered in
the affirmative. Opinion by Mr.. Justice Gray.
Mr.. Chief Justice Fuller, having been Of
counsel. did not sit in this case or take any
part in its decision.
No. SO. Thomas D. Onli ct al. appellants.
vs. Henry Iimken; appeal from the circuit
court of the United States for the southern
district of Ohio: decree reversed with costs
and cause remanded with a direction 10 dis
miss the bill. Opinion by Mr.. Chief Justice
Fuller
The Chief Justice announced that the court
would adjourn from Friday, the 23d instant,
to Monday. December 8.
The Chief Justice also announced the fol-
lowing orders of the court:
No 1S4. John A. Bentley, appellant vs..
The United States; motion for writ of certio-
rari denied.
No. 1856. Charles Davis. plaintiff in error,
vs.. The Elmira Savings Bank; motion to ad-
vance granted and cause assigned for argu-
ment on the first Monday 4th) of March next
after the cases already set down for that dav
W. OIL IAlAd44I -lNAu4SLts Hl144t4LL IL
error, VS.. Charles c. James, warden Of the
Ohio penitentiary; motion for leave to pros
ecute this cause IN forma pauperis denied.
No. - Ex parte: In the matter OF Eliot
W. Metcalf. petitioner; motion for leave to
file petition for writ OF mandamus denied.
No. 541. In the matter OF Gustaye A. jain
4 Co.: mandate granted on motion OF Mr.. So
hcitor General Maxwell forth United States.
No. $50. George a Pearce. plaintiff in er-
ror. vs.. the State Of Texas. ct al; motions TO
dismiss or affirm subniitted by Mr.. William
L. Martin in support OF motions.
No. S31. The Last Chance Mining Company
ct al, plaintiffs in error. VS.. The Tyler Min
ing Company: petition for writ of certiorari to
the United States Circuit Court OF Appeals for
the Ninth Circuit submitted by Mr.. W. 3.
Hepburn for the plaintiffs in error, in support
of petition. and by Mr.. J. Il. Mcbride and Mr..
j. \. Dolph for the defendant in error in Op-
position thereto.
No. 371 John J. Shipman et al, plaintiffs
in error. VS.. William Fletcher ct al In error
TO the supreme court of the District OF Co
lumbia. Dismissed per stipulation on mo-
ton of Mr.. Westel Willoughby for the plain
tiffs in error.
No. 204 P. F. Duffy, auditor. ct al. ap-
pellants, VS. Alexander B. Green ct al Passei
on motion of Mr 7. S. Riley for the appel
lants.
No. 199. John D. Beardsley, appellant. vs..
Motion for approval of new bond herein sub
mitted by Mr.. A. H. Garland in support of
motion and Mr.. John ]. joyce in opposition
thereto.
No. SAT. B. Frank Neatly ct al. appellants,
VS.. The Steamship Michigan; petition for
writ OF certiorari to the United States circuit
court OF appeals for the Fourth circuit sub
mitted by Mr.. j. Wilson Leakin and Mr.. Har-
rington Putnam for the appellee in support
of petition.
No. $50. Henry Morgan guardian, etc., ct
al. vs. j. E. Potter, guardian. ETC., ct al; ad-
vanced and submitted as under the thirty
second rule by Mr.. T. F. Carver for the ap-
pellants. and by Mr.. W. H. Rossington and
Mr.. Charles Blood Smith for the appellees.
No. 702. The Postal Telegraph Cable Com
pany, plaintiff in error, vs.. the State of Ala
bama. Submitted pursuant to the twentieth
rule by Mr.. I. Moultrie Mordecai and Mr.. p.
H. Gadsden, for the plaintiff in error, and by
Mr.. William L. Martin. for the defendant in
error
No. 1856 Charles Collins Buck, ct al.
plaintiffs in error, VS.. the State of Louisiana.
Motion for mandate submitted by Mr.. W.
Wallet Phillips, in support of motion, and by
Mr.. Duane f. Fox IN opposition thereto.
No. = Elk parte: In the matter of Lafay-
cite Hudson. petitioner; motion for leave TO
file petition for writ of mandsmus sub
mitted by Mr.. A. II. Garland for the petit
tioner, with leave TO Mr.. Solicitor General
Maxwell to file opposition thereto on or before
Wednesday.
No. = Elk parte: In the matter of Famous
Smith, petitioner: motion for leave to file
petition for writ of habeas corpus submitted
by Mr.. A. H. Garland for the petitioner. with
leave TO Mr.. Solicitor General Maxwell to file
opposition on or before Friday next.
No. 6S7. The Bate Refrigerating Company,
appellant, VS.. Ferdinand SuZberger ct al;
argument concluded by Mr.. James G. Carter
for the appellant.
No. 81. II. p. Lloyd assignee, etc, plaintiff
in error. VS.. Hattie A. Matthews ct al; argued
by Mr.. H. P. Lloyd for the plaintiff in error
and submitted by Mr.. G. j. Helen for the de-
PENDANTS in error.
No. SO. r. Sophia Chase, executrix, ETC..
plaintiff in error. vs. the United States: argued
by Mr.. John @. CLANCY for the plaintiff in
error and by Assistant Attorney General
Dodge for he defendant in error.
No. S4. The Baltimore and Potomac Rail-
road Company ct al, plaintiffs in error, VS..
Franklin II. Mackey, administrator. etc ;argu-
ment commenced by Mr.. Enoch Totten for
the plaintiffs in error.
Adjourned until to-day at u O'Clock. The
day call for Tuesday, November 90 will be as
follows; Nos. 81, s5 Sc, 81, 80, 81, 92, SO, 81,
and 95.