The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1894-01-05
THE JUNCTION CITY.
DAMAGE SUIT AGAINsTA "BLACk
LIsTINGn COLLECTION AGENCY.
American Commercial and CoIiec-
tion Agency n Defendant--Its Pc
culfar NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. SshoOs
Board Meeting.

Ogden, Jan. 4-This was busy day
in the Fourth district court and a
long list of motions was heard. Judge
Miner was indisposed in the afternoon,
and adjourned court at 3 o'clock. The
following business was disposed of:
J. N. Kimball came into court and
withdrew his appearance as attorney
for Ogden city, and moved for the
appointment of R. n. Whipple. 1t was
so ordered.
A A Wanger VS.. Jones Hamplini
motion to dismiss appeal. Order deny
ing above motion was set aside.
Peterena r. Hansen VS.. A. G. Han
sen; demurrer to complaint withdrawn,
defendant having filed an answer there
in.
Neponset S. & L. S. company VS.
Julia D. Dixon; motion for new trial
submitted without argument. Over.
ruled.
John Y. Rich. VS.. r. H. Jones; case
came on to be heard on motion tC
settlement. Plaintiff having consented
to the settlement of the statement and
Withdrawn his objections, it was there
upon settled as proposed.
Jacob Jensen VS.. r. H. Jones; it ap-
for serving statement therein had eX-
pired, on motion of defendants at
torney, plaintiffs attorney obejecting
1 the motion for a new trial was denied
and the hearing on motion to reta2
costs was continued, and plaintiff al
lowed to file affidayits Of nj. M. Hud
son, Jacob Jensen and p. w. Snow OF
said motion.
| J. J. Rich VS.. R. H. Jones; by con
Of oft II
PENDANTS motion for new trial was
submitted without argument, briefs K
be served this week.
| G.. Gherma VS.. Rio Grande Western
Co: the defendants motion for a new
trial having been submitted without
argument, was granted.
! n. Montgomery VS.. Fritz e. Nelson
ct al: on motion of plaintiffs attor
ney. defendants attorney conserving
demurrer was submitted without argu-
ment, briefs to be served by the re-
spective parties.
Richard Flint VS.. A H. Nelson. ct al.
defendants motion for a new trial sub
mitted without argument and denied
Ogden State bank VS.. John Keck e.
al; demurrer to complaint argued
and submitted and overruled. Ter
days given defendants to answer.
Martina Anderson VS.. C. c. Ander
son: motion of petitioner to strike
from files the motion of " Rapp ct al
for new trial was submitted
Precilla B. Christensen VS.. RiC
Grande Western company; defendant
motion for new trial submitted anC
overruled.
r. S. Brooks VS.. John S. Houtz; de
murrer to complaint submitted with
out argument, overruled and ten day:
given to answer.
Rocky Mountain Oil company VS.. N
H. Ives; demurrer to complaint sub
mitted, overruled and ten days givei
to answer.
Utah Loan & Trust Co.. VS.. H. G
Dukes ct al; demurrer to complain
joverruled and ten days given to an
swer.
Utah Loan & Trust Co. VS. f. A
Wilcox; defendants demurrer to com
plant submitted, overruled and fivt
days given to answer.
Byron Session, receiver, VS.. J. w
Eastman ct al hearing on plaintiff'l
motion for judgment. The court or
dered that the judgment entered OIL
Dec. 21st, 1898. be set aside. The cour
made new findings of fact and law
and ordered that judgment be entered
in accordance.
T. Short ct al. VS.. J. r. Pierce ct al.
hearing on plaintiffs motion to amend
plaintiffs complaint. Motion granted
and the defendant allowed ten days t,
plead, or to allow answer on file t.
stand as answer to amended complaint