New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1894-01-10
COURTS DISAGREE !.
The Order Which Judge Je1lsii
Made at Milwaukee RegardiEs
Northern Pacific Employees
Was Not Entered in Full by I'll.
Court at St. Paul-Judge
Caldwell Objected

To That Part of the Order Which Il.
Joined the Men From Striking.
What He Would Do.
LITTLE Rock, Jan. 3.-Apropos the
threatened strike which was to have
taken place Tuesday on the Northern
Pacific and the recent order of Judge
Jenkins at Milwaukee enjoining the
strike and the subsequent order Of Judge
Caldwell at St. Paul, the following will
be of interest to the public. The gen
eral administration of the receivership
devolves on the United States circuit
court at Milwaukee. That court is
called the primary jurisdiction, the re-
ceivers having first been appointed and
the property turned over to them under
the orders of that court. But it was
necessary that the United States courts
in the other states through which the
road runs should confirm for that district
the action of the Milwaukee court.
This was done by fling bill and pro-
curing ancillary receiverships in each
state. All orders of the court of primary
jurisdiction requiring to he enforced in
the other states are usually entered as
of course, and presented to those courts.
Refused to Enter the Order.
+ But gentleman in the city from
St. Paul says the United States circuit
court in that city refused to enter that
part Of the order of the Milwaukee court
| enjoi1ing the officers Of labor organiza-
tions from ordering a strike on the road
or the employees from striking on &C
count OF reduction Of their wages, but
did enter so much Of the order as en-
joined the employees in case they struck
from interfering with the property or
men employed to take their places.
When Judge Caldwell was appealed
to for information on this point he de-
clined to say more than that the writs
issued by the two courts will disclose
the the difference between them. To
an Associated Press reporter who asked
Judge Caldwell if there was any danger
of a strike on any Of the roads in this
circuit in the hands of receivers, he an
swered that there was not as far as he
knew.
What Caldwell Would Do.
Upon being asked what he would do
if a strike was threatened on account of
reduction Of wages on any of the roads
for which he had appointed receivers,
he replied:
IF receivers should apply for leave to
reduce the existing scale of wages, be-
fore acting upon their petition I would
| require them to give notice Of the appli-
cation to the officers or repr esentatives
of the several labor organizations to be
affected by the proposed change, of the
time and place of hearing and would
also require them to grant
such officers or representative
leave Of absence and fur
nish them transportation to tia plaes st
hearing and substi 'e1ting them while ia
| attendance, and would hear both sides
| in person or by attorneys, if they wanted
attorneys to appeal for them. The en-
ployes on a road in the hands of a re-
ceiver are employees Of the court, and as
| much in its service as the receivers
| themselves, and as much
Entitled to Be Heard
upon any proposed order Of the court
which would affect the whole
body of employees. If, after IL
| full hearing and consideration, I
found that it was necessary,
| equitable and best to reduce the scale of
wages, I would give the employees ample
time to determine whether they would
| accept or reject the scale. If they re-
jected it, they would not be enjoined
from quitting the service of the court
either singly or in body; in other
words, 1 would not enjoin them from
striking; but if they made their election
to strike would make it plain to them
that they must not, they quitting the
service of the court, interfere with the
property of or the operation of the road
or the men employed to take their
places.
"A United States court can very
readily find the means to effectually
| protect the property in its possession
and the persons in it's employ. have
in one or two instances pursued the
policy have indicated, and the differ
ences were satisfactorily adjusted
! Conference Ended
ST. PAUL, Jan. 3.-The conference
l 1~A- u & g.. =