The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1894-01-23
WILSON AGAIN DEFEATED.
THE SUGAR SCHEDULE KNOCKED or
IN COMMITTEES Of IHE WHOLE.

A-sns-ssts Csrries Abeilshiss the Bounty
sy-ts- sns PIseius seaued s-u-r o. the
Free List-Two Propositions 60 Place
Dp'y OF one Cent Fou.d on sursrs De-
test,d-A, Anerd-r.t sun Ps-sinE 60
Restore All sugars 90 the Duu-s,e List
TIE s-en- Tss Defeated by che Alta er
Denocrst. who Favor the Ineo-s Tax.
wAsH1NaroS, Jan. 22.-Tho sugar schedule
in Prot Wilson's makesbift Tariff bill was liter
ally knocked to pieces In the House to-day The
fight began at LIS this afternoon, and was
hot and exciting. When the committee arose
at about o'clock the sugar schedule was q
wreck. The committees proposition for the
adjustment Of the Mckinley bounty 10y a grad
uatlna process covering period Of eight years
was killed outright. and an amendment was
adopted placing refined sugar on the free list
An amendment offered by Representative
BreckinridRe OF Kentucky. a member OF the
WAYS and Means Committee. placing a duty Of
one cent a pound on sugars, was defeated, as
was like proposition offered nv Representa-
tive Hartler Of Ohio. This defeat was followed
by a parliamentary snarl from which
the House had not been extricated
when the hour OF adjournment ar
rived. The question pending when the
committee arose was on an amendment Of
fered by Representative Robertson OF LOUISE
ana. restoring all sugars to the dptiable ilst.
as amended by Representative Warmers
amendment, which makes refined suRrrs free
The tangle is made all the more com pllcated
because OF this threatening paradox. II Mr..
Robertson's proposition for a raw sugar duty
Is adopted 1t carries with It Mr.. Warmers
amendment for free refined sugar. IT. on the
oihsr hand I, Ia dafsntad I, oIso 5afe,,s the
W,rnor omondmont and ,aayos a du,v on rs-
onoJ .uo.r uht,b tho JIop.a b.. a,r.,dv votsd
20 ,noLo ,,oo
PROT Wilsop and bis Administration col.
,oaou.a On tho co,n,ni,tao yro,o obsoIu,aIv
.onnJen, ,n., ,bov would win tbe d.v Tbov
knsv that thar, would n. . marty aoht on tho
con,m,t,e,'. nronosi,io, 70 nrolcng tho lite n,
Tho .ns,.r hnnnty tor .ish, yoors I'm, ,hov
thouob, that The, could aas,Iv on.vo,o tho
ticE.rs
ny A"u NO 'u." '"". rec S"s"t "ouu po
popular oven II the bounty clause were DO.
came ABOUT one 'n'ns .hsy 10 uhue.s'anu
ministration ia powerless to force it's desires
- a., - ,.h. a. yr,.. ,uI -.
upon 'he Rouse; anu mat 'he wilson o''' mas
The success Of the free sugar men lie taken
70 mean tho success Of the income tax proposi.
tion. 1t was the income tax portion OF tho
marty that voted under the leadership OF John
N, y;,.. u. - -. - 81 ~.
De"U warner 10 put sugar on tue Tree nH
and one OF their leaders rullying cries to-day
v,s Vote for free sugar and an incom, fax
M, 80. -, 49,. a., -, ~. W.
Inc oe'ea' anu uiscomh'ure Vi 'ne "a'H
and Means Com mittee was not brought about
vitbout the timeiy aid Of the Ram hlicnns
MI, ,b,, .J.,"S, ,,,,,,,,s" -,
,ne' M1' =. e, ,,". ~ , asnS po'" 80 al
ante satisfied with the result OF their
~. g. .h... ,h. nau,a.s.,. W..
EFFORTS 10 emoarrass the Democrats' Nhen
tho vote was taken on tho motion
OF Mr. McRae Of Arkansas to abolish
% I. 800.
the Mckinley sugar bounty on July l. 1894.
the Republicans. directed OF course by Tom
Ra.3 AIT In THAR sest. avid.ntlv thin hing m.
so 80 81, 80 '.. m. !
me iriehus OF the committee on ways ana
Means did that the proposition would he de-
fo,,oJ Tha rahaIioua Democrots bovayar
-. - 80. -. - -, -.
arose IN their miRhI' anu W iarge majority
NAndmcnt A.