Little Falls transcript. [volume] (Little Falls, Morrison County, Minn.) 1876-1894, 1894-03-30

national as our flag. May we not conf
IDENTIFY hope that it will be again so held in
the near future?
Is history worth nothing? Are expert
ence and it's lessons to be forgotten? Are
the teachings of the past to count for
naught? Is the national Distress business
depression and the universal poverty of
the people, which have relentlessly fol
lowed the enaetment of every revenue tar
if measure in all our history, to be lost
upon us in the calm consideration of this
economic subjects Are all these to be dis
carded in the making up of our verdict? I
lmplore you to study them without bias.
for they will steady your Judgment in
reaching righteous conclusion.
THE WILSON BILL. ,'~
Mckinley Calls It Narrow Sectional
The Wilson bill is not like any of the
early tariff measures. but is one in which
the changed condition of the country and.
its marvellous growth and DEVELOPMENT
are utterly ignored and forgotten Its pro-.
motors forget that slavery no longer ex-
lists. They do not recognize nor appreci-
ate the independence and dignity of labor
and cannot understand. that the protective
policy under which we have had such
splendid prosperity is not to be determined
by geographical lines. The bill is a mar
row, sectionaR and provincial measure, I'M
worthy the great party which proposes it
and wholly unsuited to the needs of the
country.
The Wilson bill turns to the past; away
from the present. 1t is for the plantation,
not for the farm and the factory AS it
passed the house it had for it's foundation
principle free raw material. Its authors
argued that with free coal, free iron ore,
free lead and free;wool the manufacturers
OF the United States would be placed on an
equality with the manufacturers of free
trade countries, and we therefore could not
only retain our own markets, but control
the markets of the world" Based upon
this argument. which I believe to be false,
they declared that with these great prinl-
airy products free we would have steady
employment. for all the workingmen of the
country at good wages. And so in this
form the bill passed the Democratic house
OF representatives and is now the dread
subject of angry contention in the Demo
cratic senate.
Finance Committees Action.
An examination of the bill by the Demo-
cratic members of the finance committee
OF the senate evidently convinces them
that Mr.. Wilson's bill and his argument
in support of the same are alike based on
false principles. So coal goes back to the
tariff list, iron ore to the tariff list and
lead to the tariff list, leaving free wool
alone, the only product of agriculture, to
| support the false theory of the house bill.
Even Mr.. Cleveland is disregarded, for in
his Madison Square garden speech, after
his nomination in 1899, he said:.s. .sWe be-
lieve that the adv antage of freer raw MA
terial should be accorded to our manufac-
turers We propose, therefore, to stimu-
late our domestic industrial enterprises by
freeing from duty the imported raw ma
terials which, by the employment of labor,
are used in our home manufactures, thus
extending the markets for their sale and
permitting an increased and steady pro-
duction with an allowance of abundant
profits"
| Agriculture and Labor Suffer.
Ihave looked with some degree of care
through the bill. find nothing but irri-
tation and aggravation to the great indus
tries of the country No interest suffers
by it more severely than agriculture, and
labor of all kinds seems to have been
singled out as its foremost victim. Ihave
examined it carefully to find some section,
paragraph, clause Or line removing the
great burden Of tariff taxes from the
shoulders Of the people," about which we
have heard so much for so many years
from the Democratic orators and have
read so frequently in Democratic newspa-
pers and Platforms but have been unsuc-
cessful in finding any such provision. 1t
Is true that sugar, an article of prime
necessity to every household, and which
the law of 1890 made free to the people, has
been fairfield at from to 40 cents per
pound, every cent of which will be paid by
the consumers Of the United States.
Some Compensation In This.
But, doubtless, in compensation for this
added burden of upward of $50, 900 200, and
because of it, they lowered the tariff on
tobacco and have extended the bonded
period for the warehousing of whisky and
giving to the distillers eight years in which
to pay the tax They have restored the
tariff on coal, but then in fairness they
should be credited with having taken the
tariff off of diamonds. They reason that
the manufacturers are few, forgetting that
the workmen are many. They look to the
interests; of importers, ignoring the
farmer, and oblivious to the fact that the
agriculturist is everywhere, Their blows
are directed against the welfare Of the
masses of.the people, but from them the
country will yet hear, for this is still q
government of the people, and the popular
will has already marked them for political
overthrow. do not believe that the true
int cfSs Of fho ,E 10, otl,
section of the country, lie in the direction
of free trade, nor OF the revenue tariff
legislation proposed by this congress.
Anomalous Position ON Internal Taxes.
The present position and action Of the
Democratic leaders on internal taxes is
peculiarly an anQnnalous one. They are so
determined to break down the protective
system that they are willing to resort to
internal taxes, which have been opposed
not only by every Democratic national adj
ministration preceding the present one
from:J ackson's to Buchanan's, but also,
as a matter of principle by every other adj
ministration, Federal, nti-federal, Wing
or Republican in our history The only
excuse. for the resort to such taxation has
been the financial exigencies of actual
war. Laws imposing internal taxes have
always been repealed as rapidly as such
exigencies tllsap peared and have snever
before been seriously proposed Sin times of
peace. Some of the same Democratic
leaders who. during and subsequent to
the war, stood in congress speaking and
| voting against internal taxes and an In
come tax, are found today heartily favor
| ing them. They were unwilling to adopt
these methods of taxation when it was
necessary to preserve the government and
the flag, but they are willing to adopt
] them now as means of breaking down
the patriotic principle of protection under
which the North and Northwest, as well
as the South, have enjoyed such unpar-
alleled prosperity and have attained such
marvellous development. 2ss5
! Various Acts and Beso1ves. 81.
Y would pc interesting to the student Of
political history to examine the various
acts and resolves of congress touching In
ternal taxes, beginning in 1861 and inclrd-
ing the years during and shortly after the
war and TO note: the position Of the leaders
OF the Democratic party thereon ! have
time to refer to but one such law-the I'M
ternal revenue act which was approved by
President Lincoln July 1854 It passed
the house April q, the vote being yeas no,
nays 39, every Democrat present and vot-
ing responding in the negative The bill
was passed as amended by the senate on
june yeas g nays The negative votes
| were cas-. By Garrett DAVIS and Il nv.
Powell OF Kentucky and Thomas AZ Hem
bricks OF Ind lana.
the Democratic party on internal taxes
II