The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1894-01-26
HEARD IN COURT TODAY.
Long-Named Society After
Alleged Offenders.
TROUBLE AMONG THE FORESTERs.
Legality of Eiection-Other Mat
tcrs of Intercst-fhe Docket for
Tomorrow.

The Society for the Prevention OF Cruelty
To Animals made life burden for two
alleged offenders in the common pleas
division Of the Supreme Court today be-
was against William II. Page
OF South Scituate. This case has been
pending for many months and has now
been passed nine times. Page sent in a
physicians certificate stating that he
was unable to attend on account OF hemor-
rhage from the lungs. The court allowed
the case TO be passed although Mr.. Sayles,
counsel for the society vigorously pro-
tested and said he "knew" Page.
Another Indictment.
The second case was that OF the
society against Henry Cook of Foster.
Cook is charged with overworking, beat
ing and otherwise maltreating horse
valued at so, and of speculative age. The
poor animal was evidently a wreck m
body and mind for he frequently fell in
his tracks, according to the testimony of
the plaintiff.
The plaintiff alleges that the animal was
covered with evidences of severe beatings.
The defendant says he did not work the
animal after he discovered his weak
nesses.
Trouble Among Forcsters.
Deputy Sheriff James 5. McCabe last
son, Sl91, Ancient Order of Foresters. re-
time thra'0is the fee; court will "b be %hea sshed
to decide as to the legality of the election
held December 23 1893. An injuntion is
asked restraining the order from transact
ing any further business until the court
has passed upon the alleged illegality.
Tomorrow's Docket.
rAppellate Diyisonl
36T. Anthony Fenley VS.. William III.
Cassidy. Attorneys-G. J, West for COM
plainant, Stone IL Lovejoy for defendant.
1862. Jesse Howard vs.. Franklin B.
Ham. Attorneys-Ba q Mitchell for
complainant; A. l.. Brown and ID. W.
Fink for respondent.
1857 Maria Grimes VS.. Rosa Grimes.
Attorneys j. West for complainant,
{. T.. German and u. j. Quinn for respon-
dent.
1921. Patrick +. Grady VS. John +. Sui
livan. Attorneys - ID. III. Sheahan for
respondent.
- State VS.. Patrick Habib. Attor-
-Attorney-General for complainant.
1927. Michael Bowler ct ux. w. James
II. McCusker ct al. Attorneys; w. w. &
Il. w. Blodgett for complainant.
9617. Rosa Wagner VS.. David Wagner.
Attorney. J. Hahn for petitioner.
1906. A. q. Thurston * Son VS.. Dewey
+. Adams. Attorneys Page & Owen for
complainant, G.. j. West for defendant
1888. Catherine Agan vs.. Patrick Agan.
Attorney-H. }. Carroll for petitioner.
Common Pleas Diysionl
675. Hardt Won Bermuth a. Co. vs. r.. /.
Clothing Mfg. Co. Attorneys-J. ID.
Thurston for plaintiff, j. j. Hahn for de-
fcndant
1913. Indictment, State VS.. David +.
Lingane. Attorneys Attorney General
for plaintiff, Wilson d Jenckes for de-
fendant
40. Christopher p. Brennan VS. Mary
Elizabeth White. Attorneys-F. >! Ar
mold for plaintiff, NJ. ID. l.. Mowry for de-
fendant.
Johh C.. Knowles VS.. Frank &.
Tallman. Attorney - j. Champlin for
plaintiff.
1867. John A. Cross vs.. Brown, Steese
q Clark. Attorneys Tillinghast
for plaintiff, Colwell x Barney for defend
ant.
S73. Burrows q Kenyon VS.. John II.
Smith. Attorneys-R. W. Burbank for
plaintiff, McGuinness a Doran for de-
fendnnt.
G53. Il. Feifer * Go. VS.. Louis Michaels.
Attorneys Bassett a Mitchell for plain
tin, j. J. Hahn for defendant.
i0SS. William Hennessey vs.. Metropol-
itanII,ile Insurance Co -AttorBeys-page
a Owen for plaintiff; Miner a Rocker for
defendant.
32i. Perkins Bros. VS.. Kempf a Co.
Attorneys Page & Owen for plaintiff,
Cooke A Angel for defendant. y
John Butler vs.. Robert English.
Attorneys j. w. Hogan for plaintiff, de-
fendant for defendant.
~. Assigned Catherine Dolsn, tr. 70.