The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1894-07-15

and for the Third judicial District OF Of
Utah Territory. County of Salt Lake.
G0ron1 kkdwards Sic Plainti VS. John A
beck, Max Martin and Samuel L. Lipser,
partners doing business as Martin & Lip
G ser hIenry "; Green' and h H. NJ. Bacon.
Mary Brixen, William T. Sampson, the
Gilbert Manufacturing Company, a cor
Po G ton under the laws of the state of
Strouse and Max Adler. partners doing
business as Mayer, Strouse & Company,
H HeIs ellis Ills E Ellis Ellis Browne, Stephen
son, partners doing business as Scott &
Anderson, The First National Bank of
Park City. Utah, corporation, Andrew
tienaI Bank of Deadwood, South Dakota,
corporation, The National Bank of the
Republic, of Salt Lake City. Utah, a cor
poration, and William Groesbecll, Frank
T. Hiatt, Robert T. Burton, Sen, A. B.
Ballard, defendants. Alias Summons
The People of the Territory of Utah send
wife, Ann D. Groesbeck, Max Martin and
Samuel l.. Llpser, partners doing business
as Martin & Lipser, Henry w. Green and
H. NJ. Bacon, Charles L. Baxter, Thomas
Borlase, Mary Brlxen, William T. Samp-
son, The Gilbert Manufacturing Com
pany, corporation under the laws of the
Abraham strouse, and Max Adler, part
nerS doing business as Mayer, Strouse &
Company, Neil Glllis, T. Ellis Browne,
Stephen Hays, John S Scott and James
Scott 81 Anderson, The First National
Bank of Park City, Utah. a corporation,
Andrew G. Brixen. J. Bourgard, The FIRST
National Bank of Deadwood, South Da-
kota, a corporation, The National Bank of
the Republic, of Salt Lake City, Utah, a
corporation, and William Groesbeck.
Frank T. Hiatt, Robert T. Burton, Sen,
A. B. Ballard, Defendants. You are here
By required to appear in an action
brought against you by the above named
plaintiff in the District Court OF the Third
Judicial District of the Territory of Utah,
and to answer the complaint filed therein
within ten days exclusive of the day OF
summons-if served within this county;
or, if served out of this county, but in
this district, within twenty days; other
wise within forty dayS--or judgment by
default will be taken against you, accord
ing to the prayer Of said complaint. The
said action is brought to have Judgment
Groesbeck in sum of $SS,50O, with in
terest from July 20, 1893, alleged to be due
on a certain promissory note, executed oy
said Defendants to plaintiff, May 6, 1890,
per annum same being due and wholly
unpaid, save interest to July ~, 1873, ana
being secured by mortgage OF even 1 date ate
further sums of 1898, and interest at lO7g
per annum from Oct. 80, 1888 $5O3 ". and
l0% interest from Moy e. 1929 lsss $ s1S g ana
iOSs interest from Dec. 10, 1898, $3.50, and
interest from Dec. 10, 1893, and $l1I23, and
interest from Jan. ID. 1874. Tor taxes pai9
by plaintiff upon said premises nnTs at at said
court for foreclosure Of said mortgage
and sale Of said premises that proceeds of
counts due as above with costs and 10
attorneys fee; that plaintiff have judg,;
VIM. Groesbeck for any deficiency and for
other relief; said premises are described
west corner of lot 2, block 81, plat A.
salt Lake City survey, running thence
south As feet; thence east 1881 feet
thence north As feet; thence west 11Ssl
feet to place of beginning. situate in Salt
hereby notified that If you OF. fail to appear
ouired the said plaintiff will apply to the
court for the relief demanded therein.
Witness, the HON. SAMUEL A
MERRITT, Judge, and the Seal OF
the District Court of the Third Jul
TSeal.l dicial District, in and for the Ter
ritory of Utah, this 10th day of
April, in the year of our Lord One