New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1894-01-04
MKANE TO THE BAR.
TIT, AND HIS ASSOCIATES CALLED UPON TO
PLEAD.
c,,.,v rNTII MONDAY GRANTED-GRoUNDS
on WHICH 1T WILL BE MOVED ~ Sci
ASIDE THE INDICTMENTS.


-A v ,fctane and the other residents OF the
=, cravesend. twenty-five In ALL who are
,,,,.D,o,t for their actions before and on
,,o..,or nav w irving to subvert the Will OF the
10 ,verc called upon 10 plead TO the charges
- ogainst them yesterday in the Court OF
- o,,d rerriner Their counsel raised all the
...,,,co1 objections possible and finally secured
-. until Monday In order TO move 70 oisiniss
:, 1on,ur or plead to the indictments then
,.rco vas given that the points would De raised
.ho. here had been irregularities IN 'he "iaii"
-. ~oon, and on this ground the 1ndictiheE's
No,,,d he thrown out The alleged irregularities
-. that r. was illegal for Edward NJ. Shepard 10
- before the Extraordinary Grahu jury d.
,esistaut District-Attorney ana Dep"'!
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT, and that the presence Oh 'he
stcnorrapher. who was not the regularly APP
,.s1 s,onographer to the Grand Jury. was
also illegal ,,a as,,a, Mr.
shopard to present the persons lhu'oteu % ''"s
.n.,. NIGHT be arraigned to plead. They We're
NV IN souads The first consisted or
Wv NcKane Frederick f. Bader, Benjamin
''." ,, victor Rausenwein. indicted for viii
IL, of tho laws in relation to registra-
-" .o-s Tudre Bartlett addressed them as
follows: nina, -. ,ufruv
,,.,uo q nr,vision Of the election law re-
,a,;,s n registration. This crime Is aieseu ~
=. hoo, committed IN the town OF |raVese"u
,e,.o aud on November I. 1879. HOW 90 YOU
,iead--guilty or not guilty o,
accused men stood mute, but thelr COUNSEL
,a,r.,e u Roderick. said that he had not seen
,,e indictments. of which he undeFs'ooo 'n.'e
SC fortv-nve. eleven OF them against NJ
rooo lie wanted tine to examine them anu
.,o court had a right TO grant reasonapie "i"e
- e,a,sr1 said that for convenience the
,,d,ctnoents had been printed ana copies VI "''
,ha fo,orv charges were ready. save 'hose iot
.ari. They were So brief that theE Oo"''
10 examined in a day. The others were ionse''
a,a tho prosecution would not object to uo'aH
until Monday. o,,o,
Mr. Rodcl.ck replied that he had n'o''on
% make that would go to the fouhua''o'' u
the proceedings" lie added:
.1t is q matter Of public notoriety that we are
about to make motion 10 SET asioe ''e ''a
r,o,,. on two grounds. The first is that stem.
$50. v,os in the Grand Jury room who had
- ri~bt n be there. and that no one cNceP'
the nistrict-Attorney had any rSht 10 I've an
We have also the right TO move 10 uls, .r,o,
Tho -rou1d that the evidence was AiSu'l' -.
"a .hot inoproner influence was brought ~ oen
anon the Grand Jury. motion may ~, .n,,|os
ior leave 70 inspect the Grand july III Nv a.
90 Tho Court will have to inspect th.ii - "
60 these motions. The time until Moilua! -
very short as we have TO get recoIus i! ,an
Alhany and get afhdaNits as 10 ""''
in The Grany Jury room ro,,v 1ve,l
The Court said he seemed 70 De pIeS.vH -
informed on that point already ana nr. 9irpd h
aad1 that the motion should have oeeh l,a":'
as counsel was advised on SATURDAY IN iesi'u
vj,at had been done. 1t seemed that plu uo
iu,oad Investigation was contemplated pc.D.
,bsTa could he any effort to go into 'he me 10
- tbe indictments Ex-Judge Troy, VINO APP
,,ara6 for some Of the defendants. dscIa'i,'eu
~ desire for delav but he asked untl Moiuay
" asJ, Tor the dismissal Of the lndlctIheh''. ~
do,our 20 them. or to plead on the iheI's, 80 ,
eli the defendants had been arralgned' 'ne ma "a.
fnr was postponed until Monday Johh w
fsrovnhiu the only one who had not gwen pi''
appeared and gave bonds ,s r,,r.,o,,
u, granting the delay asked. Judge faru,''
sold. "I-nder the law. after arralRh'henl' wv
ao<ondan.s are allowed one day in whlch 10
oosyrer the indictments The Court unders'ahus
.bat IN mean that within that time plea must
he entered or motion To set aside or u'nu.
ror ~ tho indictments made. If there were put
. fau. indictments here 7 should compel the entry
NJ Meas at once. The indictments nave al
ero,vn ont Of one transaction. I think the sug-
eest;cn Of the Dstrict-Attorney that an al
iournment till Monday be taken In the longer
rases should apply 10 all. the ORDER 81 n.
~,o,rt &c that the hearing be adjourned until 'hat
sav Counsel will see that on any question ~
10 the presence Of unauthorized persons before
inc Grand Jury notice IS given OF argument 10
be heard then