Albuquerque weekly citizen. (Albuquerque, N.M.) 1891-19??, 1894-10-06
CONDUCTOR HBADY.
He Was Discharged and is Nov
ReinStated.
The Opinion and order Of Judge
Collier 10 That Effect.
No Proves That He DID Net Belong
70 the A. u. u.
IaPoBTANr COURT MATTERS.

In the case Of Nancy N wheeIock Va
Jesse N whselock, shsncery for divorce,
decree pro eonfsso was entered and
The ease referred 10 X W. d. Bryan,
standing master In chsncery, To take the
proofs. The new order. .ublishe,i In
yesterdays issue of Tue CITIZEN, direct
ing the master IN take testimony a. to
collusion and condonation, holds go,d In
all divorce cases.
In the case u the Mercantile Trust
company W tho Atlantic q Pacific II X
company. No. yss, on the U.it~si States
side Of the court, the Judge this morning
died IN opinion In the case offs ID. H.ady,
peti,ioning 10 he rcinstatsd a. an employe
In the service Of the receivers II the above
company, ~ follows:
rHH oris,os.
~ have had under consideration for
some time an application u samuel ID.
Hcady to be rcins,ated a. = passenger
conductor In the employ Of the receivers
OF the court. from which position he was
discharged by J. ". Robins, trainmaster
for the receivers =, Albuquerque, on the
9th day Of July. 1894.
THE letter OF discharge produced by
Mr.. HeAdy states tha, 'on acooun, Of
your connection with the American Rail.
way Uniop your services arc no longer
r~qairsd by this company
''lt 10 not. believe, oonsended that the
conductor st any time during the recsn,
strike, CT at any other time, failed 10 20
on duty when called upon. or that h- In
any usnnar disobeyed any order Of the
rseeivsrs. o. their authorised represent
ativss, that he was guilty u any insubor-
dination. OF that he vas negligent or un-
faithfal IN the performances of his duties.
He hsa furnished me with satisfactory
svidsuce thss hs was not . member Of
the order known ~ tho American Rail
way unsoa. svon 10 n could bc tolerated
that mere aembership In = labor or
ganssatioa vas 70 he considered suf-
hcisat csuss for the discharge Of an 9th.
erwise faithful and satisfactory empioye.
whtls have not the least desire 10 inter.
sors with the 'ecsivers Of the court or
their agsnts In their general management
OF The property. and while ! am reluctant
10 mako an order which to the unthinking
may appear TO deny 10 the receivers and
their agents tho fullest measure Of author
ity In the conduct Of their trust, I ye, feel
that In shis case the r~ssous assigned by
the trainmaster for the discharge Of this
conductor arc insufficient and are no,
founded IN fact. do not know upon
what svidsncs the trsiumsster acted, but
! An sstisasd that this conductor WAS not
connected with the American Railway
Union. and that hs took no part In the
recent strike.
II have therefore concluded that Il Ia
my duty 70 order his rsinstAtsueu, 10
tho pnsitioa from which he was dis.
charged with the same standing In the
service Of the rscsivsrs - II the order for
his discharge had never been made II
the conduct of shis conductor sner re-
inststsmeut shAll b such a. In tho opin-
bon q the receivers o. their authorised
agents 70 inpsril or sndAuser the discip-
line Of the smployss of the receivers they
will have leave 70 apply 70 the court
for Q modification of this order, but In
the msAntims u 10 sxpscssd that eli em-
pioyss and agents Of the receivers will
carry Gu, this order In good faith and In