The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1894-02-16
HEARD IN COURT TODAY.
Who Should Benefit by the Will Of
Arnold Bucklin?
Several Claimants to the Estate-Ver-
diet for Case for $5f6-Docket for
February IL.

Question as TO the disposition OF will
came up in the appellate division OF the
Supreme Court in the suit of William
| Cook against William ID. Bucklin OF Paw
| tucket.
The will OF Arnold Bucklin dates back
| for its Inception to the year 1868. His
| entire property was left TO his wife, Mar
! garet Malvina Bucklin. IL she died child
less the property was TO go to the father
| of the testator, Dexter Bucklin. Arnold
Bucklin died in 1887, leaving this will un-
| changed and his wife as administrator.
| She died in 1892 not having disturbed
| the investments IN any way Whatever.
| All investments were in the name OF
Arnold Bucklin. Mr.. Cook, the complain
ant, was appointed administrator in 1893
on the death of Malvina Bucklin
who died intestate, leaving no
children. The parties now making
claim 10 the estate are the brothers and
sisters OF Dexter Bucklin, who died in
1866. Hie left eight children.
The court Is asked TO decide whether
after Malvina Bucklins death the estate
should go TO her heirs or to the heirs OF
Dexter Bucklin.
Case Gets S5t6.
In the suit of Samuel O. Case against
Elizabeth Dodge, the jury yesterday
afternoon returned a verdict for the
plaintiff for 1915.
Docket for Feb. II.
appellate Divsion.l
3695. Dwight r. Adams, II. T., VS.. Will
liam ii. HARRISON. Attorney-A. II. Green
9505. Annie f. Hunt VS.. George /.
Hunt. Attorney-C. III. Johnson for Pc
| titioner.
1880 Thomas j. Hanley ct ux. VS.. Com
fort X. Thomson. Attorneys. Il. Lester
| for complainant, s. S. Lapham and Nc
Guinness q Doran for respondent.
1862. Maria Grimes VS.. Rosay Grimes
Attorneys r. G.. j. West for petitioner
Comstock & Gardner and p. j. Quinn for
| respondent.
1927 Michael Bowler ct ux. va. James
III. McCusker ct al. Attorneys-W. w. q
r; W. Blodgett for complainants, q. j..
West for respondents.
9539. John j. Bishoff VS.. Emma Bishof
! Attorneys-E. s. Hopkins for respondent
5000. Daniel A. Wright ct ux. ct al. VS.
Patrick Prior. Attorneys-J. w. Hogan
and III. &. Curtis for complainant, j. f.
Lonsdale and l.. t. Dongias for respond
| ent.
1886. Frederick Senft VS.. Horace F..
| Carpenter. Attorneys-Page & Owen for
complainant, 5. S. Lapham for respondent
| - Cynthia Salisbury vs.. John Saw
yer administrator. Attorneys - +. X.
| Parker for respondent.
3699. Christian Kiess eft ux, vs. James
Everard. Attorneys. j.. Hahn fer COM
| plainant.
Common Pleas Division.l
6S10. st. Paul German Insurance Co.
vs.. Geo: $: Shepley ct al. Attorney
Hahn x Cushing for plaintiff, Van
Slyck & Mumford for defendant.
373. Burrows & Kenyon VS.. John II.
| Smith. Attorneys - IL. w. Burrows for
plaintiff, =. II. johnson for defendant.
| 6601. Charles +. Brown ct ux. VS.. Will
| liam &. Smith adr. Attorneys-Page a.
frr ala t.xts ~ fz~
ia. Gilbert II. Shepard VS.. William ii.
Washburn ct al. Attorneys--O. M.
Salisbury for plaintiff, Ii. Almy and J. c.
| Ely for defendant.
653. b. Feifer a. Co. vs.. Louis Mic haels.
Attorneys-Ba Bassett a Mitchell for plain
tiff, j. j. Hahn for defendant.
675. Hardt Won Bermuth a. Co. vs. r. /.
| Clothing Company. Attorneys. ID.
Thurston for plaintiff, J. j. Hahn for de-
| fendant.
10. Herbert e. Staples VS.. II. S. Warden
alias. Attorneys-Page Il Owen for plain
| tiff w. III. Barney for defendant.
1885, Philip Cumerford VS.. T.. j. Crabbe,
app. Attorneys-~H. s. Babcock for plain
tiff, c. M. Lee for defendant,
7v6. John Jerrett ct al. VS.. John Han
cock NJ. L. Insurance Company: Attor-
neys-H. j. Carroll for plaintiff, McGuin-
ness & Doran for defendant.
2l2. Edward Quinlan VS. Fairbrother
eft al Attorneys-H. j. Carroll for plain
tiff, Comstock and Gardner for defendant.
5922. Thomas Griffin vs. q. G. II. X. Co.
Attorneys Page & Owen for plaintiff, II.
w. Hayes for defendant.
6S32. Julia A. Faulkner VS.. n. Y, n. II.
* III. II. X. Co. Attorneys-Page & Owen
for plaintiff, w. b. Vincent for defendant.
$3.50. Universal Fashion Co. VS.. Berry
Bros. Attorneys-C. r. Champlin for
plaintiff, II. w. KimbalI for defendant.
COOS. Allen Print Works VS. w. F. d +.
{. Sayles. Attorneys-S T. Douglas and
j. Tillinghast for plaintiffs, G. p. Robin
son for defendant.
271. Laura Manning vs.. William II.
Stearns. Attorneys Ballou & Jackson
for plaintiff, w. III. Swectland for de-
fendant.
1855. Providence Coal Company VS..
Coke Bros. g. Co. Attorneys--J. w. II. 4
T. +. Tillinghast for plaintiffs, j. M. Rip
ley for defendants.
20. Moses w. Hortonet ux. VS.. Cornelia
G. Horton. Attorneys--J. w. II. 4 T. +.
Tillinghast for plaintiffs, j. NJ. Ripley and
A. l.. Brown for defendants.
676 Assigned Bronia Lipschutz VS..
Henry Rosen nblatt. Atttorneys-F. III.
Wildes for plaintiff, j. J. Hahn for de-
fendant.
ISL. Assigned. Catherine Dolan tr. vs.
James Dolan. Attorneys-C III. johnson
for plaintiff, p. j. Mccarthy for defend-
ant.
739. Assigned. James Brown VS.. VIM.
l.. Gardiner. Attorneys-C j. Farnsworth
for plaintiff, III. G.. Curtis for defendant.
THE MARINE REPORT.