The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1894-10-19
DOCKET FOR OCTOBER 20.
The Supreme Court calendar for 5atur-
day, is as follows:

The Supreme Court calendar for batur-
day, is as follows:
fCommon Peas Division Motion csses.l
967. Dante Regali w. John Caproni.
Attorneys-G. j. West for plaintih; X. w.
Burbank for defendant.
96S. Augusta Ferrarivs. John Caproni.
Attorney Same as IN 957.
1olS. City OF Prov vlde nee vs.. commissou-
ers in re Washington street. Attorneys
City Solicitor for plaintiff; various counsel
for defendant.
-. simon Barnard VS.. Charles Cohen.
Attorneys-C. Il. Parkhurst for plaintif;
]. j. Hahn for defendant.
1888. Stone x Loveioyvs. Joseph u. Col
burn ct al. Attorneys-W ilson and Jenckes
for plaintiff; Tanner d Cannon for de-
fendant.
452O Ora Heald VS.. William II. Gurney.
Attorneys-J. Osfie.d, Jr., for plaintin, w.
w. Robinson for defendant.
900. Ill. j. Davis vs.. w. B. Davis. At
torneys-A. =. Johnson for plaintiff; Lee
* Tillinghast for defendant.
l16i. Wheeler Il Wilson Mfg. Co., VS..
Jennie Johnson. Attorneys-Lee & Till
ins hast for plaintiff; McGuinness and Do
ran for defendant.
liI0. George Bach vs.. Isaac Mumford.
Attorneys-Lee n Tillinghast for plain
tiff; G. Il. Brown for defendant.
1862 j. L. Farrell vs. James Mc0rath.
Attorneys-Lee Il Tillinghast for plain
tiff; Wood Il Fitch for defendant.
S62. First National Bank, PlAinfield,
VS.. Rice Brothers. Attorneys-Bassett q
Mitchell for plaintiff; j. ID. Thurston for
defendant.
1850 Alva f.. Warren VS.. Arthur T..
Humes. Attorneys-Williams II Tanner
for plaintiff; Page 81 owen for defendant.
1888. Joseph Mcneil VS.. Bachand ~
bault Tor plaintiff; w. G.. Rich for de-
feudant
-. James Corrigan VS.. John b. Gray.
Attorneys. NJ. Brennan for plaintih;
ID. b. Potter for defendant.
Common Pleas Diyision-Assigned Casesl
12i7. Dennis McGinn pro ami vs.. X. A.
Sweet. Attorneys-G. j. West for plain
tiff; Cooke and Angel for defendant.
12iS. l.. II. Mumiord vs.. w. X. Greene
ct al. Attorneys-G. j. West for plain
tiff: Bakers for defendant.
1910. l.. w. Morse vs.. Albert IL. Thorn
ton. Attorneys-G. j. West for plaintiff;
III. M. Kimbail for defendant.
1871. Patrick j. Cannon VS.. Union Rail-
road Co. Attorneys-G. j.. West Tor
plaintiff; Bakers for defendant.
"a. Albert L.. Andrews vs.. Thomas Cul-
len. Attorneys-McGuinne and Doran
for plaintiff; L. F. Cosgrove for defend
ant.
appellate Division Motionsl
1856 (divorce). Louis ii. Williams w.
Albert M. Williams. Attorneys-A. A.
Baker for plaintiff; j. Il. Goldsworthy for
defendant.
97sl (divorce). .. Cyrus W. Fletcher VS..
Florimond II. Fletcher. Attorneys
Wood Il Fitch for plaintiff; II. G. Curtis
for defendant.
$3.50 tequity). Peter McGough, adr. vs.
James Hughes ct al. Attorneys-D. j.
Holland and j. NJ. Brennan for plaintiff;
Il. w. Robinson for defendant.
1871 (equity). Same as $3.50.
3S0S (equi.y) Mcauley Brothers VI. Pat
rick Tierney ct al. Attorneys-Tanner q
Cannon for plaintiff; James Tillinghast
for defendant.
363S equity. City Savings Bank vs..
w. j. Mitchell, adr. ct al. Attorneys-J.
NJ. Ripley for plaintiff; j. M. Brennan and
Bassett 4 Mitchell for defendant.
3577 (equity). Amos M. Hawkins & Co.
VS.. American Mills 20. ct al. Attorneys
Thurston, Ripley q Co. for plaintiff, Bal
lou Il jackson, 3. w. X. Allen for defend
ant.