The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1894-03-27

EraILs or POLLARD SUR sHourp
Nor I'M rEfNrkn.
ssme Dispositions Tor she persnse Over
ruea Hoseilc's Testimony Admitted.
sish,seefs Visit tho Court Room
to See Me. Btechinrdee.

Washington. March M.--lcncta tpNts ,
army OF the commonwcat has been no
| more ouccossfnl IN attraeiing % ITSELF q
miscellaneous AGGREGATION o. ceicni1tes
than was the roliard- Areckefrange kr'ni
Today. In mont row opposite tAe }a's
| M. ~. ,.yo,nor Of indiana anu scycsai
| Is S,.,,ssr4 ~ nls alait. VINO mac rpmr " A
! 1, ,tsn,naton 10 see tue s.Snts enu $50 a'.s
Permanently upon the sltrcsN pcaip y, NJ, s.'S
sf t,c TX ilfeasiol,s wnicn netoken-
2" tntf they hau not jonfpeSed mere ~
Ve .,i H., ,,,su, vvaA Captain Phllllp HipR,
| III ana p,incetbwn University pAsS IN <
| ssam. supported by MA wa1riors anv "t1,z
! ietSs wnOse NAMES &c hsv"s' ~,
ols 1h her N Inc background was tlls i ~,
4. mixed audience wstn . as'eVo ~ ~ VITA
lor ccngfr9s ~ M WIN ts'ai' '
sl9,sre we're no ladies pee4nse NY tnr wa 9're
IS ontlawed from ne rv2m sias sn at-
lied women Hlipped IA E size 1s ss,,.,,s fot
the guidance a eailin a@a H HFSs In.
Il NY ua ..',',s Ne aar IN consu,tntlon WITH
,s 4, !, ts.rs IA chitdrcn ARE aceusatan'N'
10 stare AZ the animAis ~ ',,ales'siS,s Tor
y, ~, fbe ohieclious 10 the ucpoWsVis.s ~,
4 8, i ~, wy rsf,,s sif,..s were even anNE1
nraa9ey cxclndvd several anu eNp1ess e,s
reerct that he had no ps MI, ~ NJ ohscensty
f a., y nfaunth Presbyterian, mpr rs
% sueeestcd that the neNNp9sspe1r s,g,ns'is
ponqrt,s sscna o s,,p,,,lls ssncfailty.
.,,,,ere was vent interest t0da5 ~ i''s 81,
tho decision OF judge h $500 s,,,,c'schiax
~ va nss ~ Madcine Pollard whise
ny nrenlSinridge fosces mad 9iieleu v ny,
3 wnirh the plnintin opposen i''s'''S,
ooas s'..e,eS,, thc sweeping denial o tne
y, asllte amy deppsissonN ne p .,s ma
4 nndn4 inc act % gonEssss ~ ts,diclary
ISe.'lS., stso sro,iferrcd The right " ptpau
TERMS iibon any party y aug Stft s,,,ia
any court Of he unitca Ss .'.s renir, III
i5.hS pTnsfcR stn,fcs arid the fact that tne
ca,irt haa always mnntaaned t1at Fg ~.
Mould JUSTIFY him IN seiaiss.'lsl< -
iccs qshere were ctier gfoUflas upoN WHIP
is SUSTAINED the regularity OF the dspofi-
. 1,tsntIons Ind been made to the deepest
t.oa az one brand bacapse ne refused 70
answer centAfn u1est.pns cnncernang y
gognn we ad i MT " , nm want - s' "a
ssgive away a married woman, and Then
persisssd chat ne did not know her name.
The jttiee said that & arpeafed that ln+
not know or was lydifg. He conttnue1s
saving that while the direct examination
stphrHwsr a usstion whether NJ had taken
liberties with her. What objection ne
g,sla .laxe nild ~ reiasltis g answer, Z
7siif, the iifdse could not see sinco from IFS
tcstin1cny he was utterly lacking In moral
sen sens aq I'M. that aatllongll marricd
4 man ne WIS accustomed TO visit hongas- AZ
Y ~ fame, The judge ogerrued TS1is obinc-
t1oih Reminding that Niese was f3ihisiss ~.
/ 49, ilpom Mss Poltara 81 tsc texasrsnv
iiniesS 4 WAS that she iat ronsantel fn
1 afsoclafe with such n disrenftable .,As,..>t.
8 ter tS t3lc witness admitted himself 10 no
sr,s H 's q one elfnan was a "a
nnmNseu, but Itsge Bradley smoke vrf,,
snArpiy ~ these last two ssysng fila4 thcy
:, , $3.50 us.etix ufiiif 70 be read before !.
Z np1 ~, mt he would gladly exclude Dem
y Y, rs ne Souin. Uni fKllreSsed the mona fsi91
a VIC counsel woifli seq ut fo 80, 4 ms az,
e l,''x .ssscenr MAJ strtIn thaiti
4 ~ fusisined The objections which haS
+ neen mate 70 the dnrnsfiouS or J1bS
llSS2e. Or. Greene and Dr. Lewis fha1
Il they were basez On heArSnv DE- .,.,;s
-. issan who testified that colone
sT0pe, inc republican Candidate for oon
greas N the l1nxipsfon District hne
i. aslsed him % perform q criminal opern
I. tian up1D Mics Pollard.
III tEhe dcppritions Of hfre. Miller and n
u iS9Seiic. who had been engaged II 3iseI
q tSeliaN While she WAS IN the Wealnyaf
n nssIn wsre admlt,sd; tI,e lags ceh
character and ner maturity 81 mearfr.
p question BY that clause ef the 1eclRra
i seduced hy the dgfendnnt and Thar sii,
& was q mere girl when Colonel Breckln
IiuEe first met her Each side filed oil
d Judge Bradley made a few remarks Ii
the interest Of public morality "a he sela
+ ne court haa been aellged VIE anon
= vmoua letters Ia ghis case hi began. q
= u suld thai any one who would write a.
anonymos letter should not axpect /.
7 maze any notic4 taken Of them md wnuli
3 90 almost anything nieaiE Some Of theA
lFitefs, however, seem % come from e
Ie inalez and ~ be dictated hy good mo
10 l tiYsia e
Many d them referred 70 tbe pnbiIca
Ie ton Of details Of the trial: w{iiie III
u lscoi;rt conld eHerflse no censorship ofe
csnH the improper dcfail&. ~ he though
!, solae 81 these detniis II puhilaheds Nolii
10 r,sil,Ss '' t 4. ~, tts.i, ~
y was nitnost calamity 90 the city q
WaFhlneton anu the country If iarg
a ---.-s--szs