The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1894-09-20
IEG4L NOTICES.


IN THE SUPERIOR CoCRF OF The STATE
of Washington for King county. In probate.
In the matter OF the estate OF Charles W. Law
ton, deceased. Ne. lsg6. OTdsr to show cause
why distribution should not be made.
A. |. Spencer. the adm nistraior of the estate
of Charles w Law,on, deceased, having filed IN
this court bis petition setting forth that said
estate is now in a condition to te closed, and is
ready for distribution OF the residue thereof
among the persons entitled by law thereto. and
IL appearing 10 the court that said petition ssis
forth facts sufficient To authorize distr button
OF the residue OF said estate;
1t is therefore ordered by the court that all
persons interested in the esIats OF the said
Charles ". Lawton, deceased, be and appear be-
fore the ssid superior court OF King county,
state OF Washington. ~ the court room OF the
probate department. Of said court. in the city of
seattle. on the 2sth day OF september, 1895. Al
ths hour OF $3.50 o. clock a. N. OF said day, then
and there to show e8nss. IL anF they have. why
an order 81 distributor slo1ld nos De made OF
the residue OF said estate among the heirs Aad
persons IN said petition mentioned according 10
law.
Itisfu further ordered that copy OF this or
der be pa bltsaei oace 8 week for ioar success
sfFe weeks Iefofe the sad &efh day Of ~ ptefa-
Der 1924, "a the Daily Poss-inteliigeneer. news
paper printed aud paclished 10 sad King county
and Of general circulation therein. Done IN
open court this Z7ih esy OF Ausas', $50
Judge Of said superior Court
STATE OF wssHIEGFoS,
COUNTY OF hISG.
-
OF King county. state % Washington, 40
hereby certify that the above a1d fofegO-
Ing document IL q true, correct sa1 coEaTiets
copy o. an order OF said superior court 20 Snow
cause why distribution OF said estate should
not be mate in the above entitled matter. made
and entered by said court on the Z7th day OF
August. 1894
In witness whereof have hereBnto set nay
had aud Afaxsd taa sea- OF said court taaB
lsEsIl 7. ". GORDON. Clerk.
bS y : FETEssox pecuty Clsr.
II THE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUE STATE
Il OF asatngtos, oouuEy % King
FRANK g Howell, plaintiff, rs John Roh8nkgn.
Ans koblnsca, hts wife, +. j. AnEisF. 9oss-
Pnlea Saaisy, his wfts. David NJ Hofsa "a
and Thomas }. sweeney, defendants No.
ls.scA Equity. Summons.
Tie state Of ashingfcu % the sai8 Josa Rob
Insou. Aana Rooms r l. NgnIsy. Jsss-
peien S1n8sy. David ". Hoffman and Thomas
J. sSe&aey. defendants
You are hSrehy summoned 20 a?pzas within
twenty DAYS a ter Service o. this s0mEous. er-
elusive OF tas day 'ui service. and defend ihs
above entitled action En tAs eoarE Aforesaid and
sass1r tIze cem paint and serve q cory ct your
snsser on Tire undersigaes4. Ettornsy for tie
p42ngr. az 30 Isoo Pac4Hg aysa ue, T&coass.
Pierce county. Washington, ana ia ease of your
failure 50 - do judgment wl8A De rendered
szainsf Fcu sccording 70 the demand Of the
Of ssi4 couEL
PlAaNG hereby eesixaa.es tie eoaaty Of
ksnx. siz Of h&shIngssa, as tie place o. trial
Of he above aetacn- r y. WILCOX.
Pssings.s AttGF1eY.
p Q. address No 80 Pacific assaas. Psstas
National barx building. lsee2s. F.sEes
ssgasy. asAlsgteA