Morning journal and courier., 1894-04-07
COURT RECORD.
Superior Court - Civil Side Judg,

Superior Court - Civil Side Judge |
 Prentice.
 SIX divorces granted yesterday and in | all seven divorce cases were heard, the | plaintiff in each case being the wife. Many were the tales of domestic infelicity re- hearsed. Five of the dscrees granted are to New Haven parties.
 Mrs. Henrietta Craven of this city was divorced from her husband, Ezekiel Craven, on the grounds of adultery. There is also criminal process for bigamy pend ing against him. The parties intermar- ried in New Jersey In January, 1877, and Craven deserted his wife in December, 1890. Since that time Craven has been lIv- Ing with Jeannette Artmsn of this city, to whom, 1t is claimed, he is married, and on this account the bigamy proceed ipgs were brought. Mrs. Craven asked for q 900 alimony, but was only granted $1OO.
 Ida Burdick of this city was divorced from her husband, Edgar, on the ground of desertion.
 Belle Underwood of this city was di- vorced from Charles H. Underwood, whose whereabouts are not known and to whom she was married April 1, 1878. Since that time she has been deserted three times.
 Ada J. Gillis of Ansonia was divorced from John Gillis, whereabouts unknown, on the grounds Of desertion. The couple were married March 5, 1881, and nine yesrs' later, in 1890, the wife was de- serted.
 The second divorce granted on scrip. tural grounds was to Leonors Olsmmons of this city from her husband, Frederick A., to whom she was married August 27,
 1885.
 Agnes Eichler of this city proved beyond the shadow of e doubt that her husband, Charles, had deserted her September 15, 1889, and secured decree on that ground. The couple were married on Christmas day, 1888, the plaintiff then being Miss Agnes Schmidt.
 The divorce case of Nellie s. Clark against Henry P. Clark was continued un- til next week.
 The following matters were also dis posed of:
 Attorney J. BIrney Futile, counsel for Mrs. N. Gertrude Pratt, nee Hall, in the divorce suit brought against her by her husband, Charles R. Pratt, on the ground or a0ultery, made motlOn TOT an allow ance of $1, ,000 to defend. The motion was opposed by ex Judge York, who is sssoci- ated with Attorney G. R. Cooley, but he finally agreed to e present allowance of $250, granting the defendant the right to make a motion for a further allowance If the court saw ft to grant 1t. This arrange, ment was satisfactory to Attorney Futile
 and the motion was disposed of in this manner.
 At 8 special bar meeting of the county the question of admitting Macrane Cox and William E. Anderson, both of New York to the Connecticut bar was referred to 6 committee consisting of Attorneys T. H Russell, J. Fl. Webb, S. A. York, jr., and Clerk Anketell, who will report next Fri, day.
 The following jury cases were assigned | for trial next week: Tuesday-Hurley vs. Bassett ct als, Bradley vs. Monson, Bristol ct al. vs Norton. Wednesday-Brown vs. Boyle, Platt vs. Mil | ford, Miles tr., ct al. vs Strong ct als. Brandy company, Weinberg vs. The London As | surance corporation, Pallman vs. Lee. | By agreement of counsel a hearing the ha beas corpus case of George A. Lyon will be helt | at the close of the short calendar session mex | Friday.
 II CItv Conrf-CrinaInal SIda-Indo,