The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1894-03-25
Salt Lake city. March 3. 1894.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND
for the Third Judicial district of Utah ter
ritory; county Of Salt Salt Lake: Aaron Key
Burke salt Lake Real Estate and Invest
ment company, a corporation, Fred Tit,
Mary A. Tit John j. Daily, trustee, the
oscar w. Moyle,- assignee. Catherine I
Dyer, Gertrude Van Anda, Mary Brixen
W. S. Mccormick, and Union National
bank, a corporation, defendants sum
send greeting: To William Burke
Mary L. Burke, Salt Lake Real
corporation, Fred Tit, Mary A. fit, John
J. DAILY, trustee, the Burtcn-Gardner COM
pany, corporation, Oscar w. Moyle, as
sig9ee, Catherine r. Dyer Gertrude Van
and Union National bank, a corporation
defendants. You are hereby required to
appear in an action brought against you
by the above named plaintiff in the dis
trict court of the Third Judicial district
of the territory of Utah, and to answer
the complaint filed therein within ten DAYS
(eXcluSiVe of the day OF Service) after the
service on you of this summons-if served
within this county; or. if served out of
this county, but in this district within
twenty days; otherwise within forty days
= or Judgment by default will be taken
70 gainst you. according to the prayer of
said COMPLAINT. The said action Is brought
to have judgment against defendants on
two causes of action as follows: First
7 Against defendants Burke in sum of ST. 900
with interest from january %, 1882. at II
per cent. per annum, for 800 attorney S
fee, alleged to he due on a certain promis-
sorry note, executed by said defendants to
plaintiff March g. 1891, for Sc, 600 with inter-
est at Ii per cent. per annum, same being
due and wholly unpaid, save interest TO
January %. 1892 and being secured by a
z interest of east = of lot qbI ocK
fplat A, Salt Lake City survey, in Salt
IdLake city and county, Utah. Second TO
have judgment against defendant William
! in 7
per cent. per dnnum from December A.
1892. for $3.50 attorneys fee and costs of
suit alleged to be due on a certain promise
sorry note executed by said defendant to
plaintiff May Il, 1891, for $1,000 with inter-
est from date at 10 per cent. per annum,
sane 9ei IN que ana W4 1Sdg unpaid save
cured by a mortgage of even date on fol-
lowing: Commencing SO feet south and Sd
block 81, plat A, Salt Lake City survey,
thence east so feet, thence south 1S2 feet
I thence west 60 feet, thence north 132 feet
TO beginning, in Salt Lake city and county
/ Utah, to have said mortgages foreclosed
and said premises sold, and proceeds OF
first described land applied in payment of
amount due in first cause of action, and OF
said secondly described land to amount due
on second cause of action; to have defend
ants barred of all claim or equity of re
demption III said premises; that plaintiff
/ have judgment for any deficiency and foI
/ other relief. And you are hereby notified
| that il YOU fail to appear and answer the
/ said complaint as above required, the said
! plaintiff will apply to the court for the
relief demanded therein.
Witness, the Hon. Samuel A Mer-
rift, judge, and the seal of the dis
trict court of the Third Judicial
/ (Seal.) district in and for the territory OF
| Utah, this 18th day of February, in
the, year OF our Lord one thousand
eight hundred and ninety-four
DAVID c. DUNBAR, Clerk
! By GEORGE d. LOOMS, Deputy Clerk
ItaWlins & Critchlow, Attorneys for Plain,