Evening journal., 1894-11-20
CIVIL AND CRIMINAL.
Matters Before the Judges at
the Court House.
YOUNG BURGLARS PLEAD GUILTY


Brought Before It-AIlnor Offenders
Sentenced Yesterday Afternoon and To-
day-Cases Set for Trial In the Superior
Court.
The civil list of the Superior Court
was the first thing taken up by Chief
Justice Lore and his associates yesterday
afternoon. As usual in such case there
was full representation OF members Of
the bar looking after the interests Of
their clients. The chief justice stated
that the proceeding was not an informal
matter but prescribed by the statutes.
He further said that the list would be
gone over again at 80 o'clock on Thurs
day afternoon, and at that time special
juries must be applied for.
The cases set for trial were as follows:
Mary E. Mcllvaine VS. the p w. & B
Railroad Company; Mary A. Hart vs.
same; Martin @. Huber vs.. the jackson
and sharp Company Charles Reidel vs.
the p w. & B. Railroad Company Peo
vs. Sock; Julia D. Wright VS. the P w.
& B. Railroad Company; Capelle Hard
ware Company VS. Jester q Mcdaniel;
Elmer Reeve vs. the Wilmington
City Railway Company Samuel
G. Fisher VS.. the Republican Printing
aud Publishing CompanY Walter Robert
Wal ters vs.. the same; Samuel g. Fisher
ct al. VS.. e. P. Williamson; Walter
Robert Walters VS.. the same, in six
cases for libel; Joseph B. Walsh's ad.
ministrator VS. the B & P. Railroad
Company; Amelia e. Finegan VS. the
Wilmington City Railway Company;
Charles ]. Gibbons VS. same: Beniamin
L Kent VS.. same; William H. Weeks VS..
same; Kent & Weeks vs. same; L. &
L. A. Kittinger VS.. Hannah Nc
Donnell's estate; Philadelphia Warehouse
Company VS.. Pierce Gould, sheriff;
Thomas j. Day vs. the Jsssup & Moore
Paper Compsny; Eliza E. .Mnnson VS..
Alfred 5. Hurloek; Robelen & Co.,
vs. the National Bank of Whining
ton and Brandywine; Samuel D. Roth
well, d b. a., VS.. Parvis and Williams
Company, p. b. r. jesse L. Talley vs..
the City Building and Loan Association !;
Joseph Garlick VS. the Brandywine
Granite Company, William G. Spruance
retiring from the defense, and Willard
Salisbury, Jr, succeeding him, will lay
legal grounds for a continuance; John
Mcleod VS.. Peter j. Sibre; John Bailey
vs. Pierce Gould, sheriff; Finley q Foulk
VS.. G. s. Hurloek & Bro. Andrew G.
Clark VS.. Hysore & Harris; Constant
Granshommie VS.. Mayor and Council
Of Wilmington Mabel l. Edwina L and
John W. Adair VS.. John j. Dougherty.
ct al. Charles e. Smith VS.. the B &
Railroad Company; B. p Leverldge s.
Sons vs.. Armon d. Chaytor; Standard
Sewing Machine Company We. George E
Smith Severn Mazofski vs., the p, ". q
B. Railroad Company; Security, Trust
and Safe Deposit Company vs.. the City
Building and Loan Association Henry
Pusey vs. Thomas r Lally; Benjamin
W. Clark. ct al, VS. Thomas Fagan, ct
al Frank Pulaski VS.. the Hartmann and
Fehrenbach Brewing Company; w.
r Williamson VS.. Horace Mcdaniel
George H. Kerr vs. same; Charles
Gouert VS.. same; Percy Darlington VS.
same; John E Orchard VS. Lewis p
Buck; James A. Kelley vs. George A.
Bullock Ida " Pyle VS.. the p, w. &B
r R. Co. Citizens National Bank, Of
Middletown, VS.. Alexander P. Comegys's 8
administrator Home Insurance Company
VS.. James Byrne, ct al. J. Thomas Lowe
VS. John I. Salisbury, garnishee Of e. D
r Sutton.
Referred-Emma M Willis VS.. B F.
Crsddock. constable; Robert B. Will
Hanson VS. John M. Mulrooney; Richard
B VS.. Josephine Perrott; George w Evans
VS. Rene ] FougeIsy, owner or reputed
owner; Prudential Insurance Company,
Of America, VS. Charles q Collins,
p. b. r. Singer Manufacturing Company
VS.. Annie J. Seeney; John II O'Conner
VS. the Massachusetts, Benefit Life Asso
citation; Sam Peo VS.. Ann Began
To be settled or tried this term
johnson s Barnhill vs.. the Baltimore and
Philadelphia Railroad Company; Mary ].
Walker VS.. James Mitchell's admins
TRAITOR; Francis A. King VS.. the Pullman
Palace Car Company
Discontinued-Will Green's execu-
tor VS. Jacob B. @. Maxwell, ct al John
Doe VS. Patrick Fshey and William T.
Knott.
Judgment for defendant-John Doe VS.
James G Dillon.
Judgment for plaintiff, amount to be
ascertained by the prothonotary-Gi
Lambson vs. J. w. Aydon
William Il Brown and William
Fl Jackson vs.. the p, w. B. Railroad
Company; the J Q Bryer Company VS..
White Brothers.
Mr.. Churchman'S PredIcament.
When the case Of Benz amin w. Oak
| ford vs.. the Walton and Whann Com.
pany was called, Philip Q. Churchman
counsel for the plaintiff, created laughter
by saying: IF 1t please your honors
the defend ant is In the hands OF receivers
and within the last two weeks the plaint
if has died. He WAS given genera
leave to amend.
Owing to the Death Of j. Hood Wright
The cases OF J. Hood Wright VS.. Edga
Chandler W. Scott Vernon, Howard f
Vernon, George Churchman, Francis N
Buck, William f. Robinson, Harlal
Cause, Wilmington Dental MsnufacE M
ing Company, George A LeMaistre an,
Frank O. Corbit, garnishees Of Henry Q
Robinson, were continued owing to tn
death Of the plaintiff, and: Mr.. Bradfor
was given leave to amend
In the Criminal Line.
These matters disposed Of the Court 0
General Sessions proceeded to work
Howard Rice, colored, an old courtie
of the tickle goddess, pleaded guilty Q
gambling, and was fined 800 or on
months imprisonment In default of pay
ment. There were certain extenustin