New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1894-01-10

a. Milne having neglected anG
& failed up to this time to place in The
! hands OF this Board any Of the original
certificates testimonials, and other papers
& required by resolution Of this Board, un.
animously agreed to Nov. 20, 1898, to be
q furnished on or before Dec. 4, 1898, 1t
was unanimously agreed by this Board
that the following order be served on
said w. A. Milne as therein ordered
I "Otfice Of the School Examiners of
the City of New Ulm, Minnesota.
/ ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE.
WHEREAS, the School Examiners of
the public schools in and for the City of
New Ulm, in the County of Brown, and
State tof Minnesota, did heretofore, on
the sth day of September, 1898, grant a
special teachers certificate to one Will
am A. Milne for this school district. ex
piring on July 9th, 1894, upon the exam
nation made by said W. A. Milne before
the said School Examiners, and upon the
statements made and contained in the
application of said W. a. Milne for
position to theBoard ofEducation in and
for this city, which were accepted as true
by the School Examiners, as we'll as
upon the evidences of scholarship and
professional attachments presented and
claimed by saidW. "A. Milne, and The copies
of testimonials also presented to said
School Examiners, all of which were also
accepted as true, with the understanding
and on the condition that all of said
statements should be verified within a
reasonable time by submitting to this
Board certificates of standing and other
original papers and testimonials. which
was agreed to by said W. A. Milne, but
! which he neglected and failed to comply
with up to this time, although repeated
requests therefor have been made on the
part of the School Examiners;
AND WHEREAS, a question has
arisen as to the truthfulness of the state
ments made by said W. A. Milne in his
said application for a position as teacher
IN this school district, as we'll as to the
truthfulness of the statements made and
claimed by said w. A. Milne with refer
ence to his educational and professional
attachments hereinbefore referred to;
AND WHEREAS, the said School
Examiners heretofore, on November Goth,
1898, requested the said W. A. Milne to
appear before them and furnish the proof
of the matters hereinbefore referred to,
and the said w. A. Milne, having APP
peared, claimed that he had proof in his
possession to substantiate part of his
said statements, but declined to produce
the same, and further claimed that he
needed, and requested two weeks time
to procure the proof to substantiate and
verify the matters hereinbefore referred
to;
AND WHEREAS, the said School
Examiners granted said W. A. Milne
two weeks time to furnish such proof,
and the said W. A. Milne having neglect
ed to produce said proof up to date;
| AND WHEREAS, the said w. A.
Milne, at the meeting of said School Ex-
aminers on November goth, 1898, did
then and there in the presence of and in
reference to said School Examiners use
language and expressions entirely unbe-
coming teacher and ger tleman;
NOW THEREFORE,, it is hereby ord
cred by said School Examiners that the
said W. A. Milne show cause, if any he
have, before us at the office of Jos A..
Eckstein, the Chairman of said School
Examiners, in said City Of New Ulm,
Minnesota, On December 22nd, 1898, at
I 4 80 p. m. of that day, why the teachers
certificate granted by said School Ex-
aminers to said w. A. Milne as aforesaid,
should not be in all things revoked for
the reasons, that said w. A. Milne did
Continued on page 6.