The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1894-04-05

Did not that col ored WON a say 10 you that
che preferred TO stay where she wasY'
a, ne sy g. here. nots word OF truth IN either
Col Breeting ridge made a sweeping denial tn
made protsstations Of love ana airsetion to The he
platntln at WESLEYAN ColleRs when their Illicit
relations ms SI.S.n or q, snyo 81 time
par Of what should term sfiection IL IL I. % an
sPns. 70 dIsrsnt peope no si tIms dnrns
TIE interval from the day first met her At the
.y.s until s1
you ask me " showed sffectionats kindlinsss
OF the manli.staion OF kindly interest |
sshonid say that had shown feeling Of that
-. When dId you manifest thi. hindlins.. for
In the spying Of 1887. believe. when was
informed by her that she was In trouble by me.
There never va. At any time any sIpression
tionste Interest in her. but not snsction for
which were Of a nature estrsmsiy Kind. but
she never received any expression from me OF
II want to know II these expressions were
OF kind that would convey to her mind an
Impression that you entertained an affection
1 cannot undertake to say what impress
sion may have been conveyed 70 her, pind,"
expressions Of Kindness. and I was particu-
ssrsisi to be sogd and kind f. her yhsn
"a sort Of business arrangement" said
oh. no." said Col. Breekinridge. mot a
business srranssment. but m orely sp arrange
m me Tor her good IL The future ! used ex.
shSf sFs be hest
never used expressions OF love. They were
merely expressions that q man would use
he was responsible to some degree"
D n,hy yoS ever manifest affection for her in
Well 1 took her in my arms and kissed
her. and did all those things which are
You merely took her In your arms to assist
in the FrstiGc.tlon Of your sens1sI ieslingsT'
suit Of what our relations were. MY reln-
tons with her were not wholly sensual;
,siser. aud at time. Very a aatsactiya She
had made proteststions OF ardent love for
s.. cy. the h., mot
there was very great Kindness on ny part.
and sometimes very great anger and fierce
Now. you have said that the publication OF
man Do ,ou thnl ,Ser.
10 any moral OBLIGATION on 9 man to keep . wo-
msp IsH% sesi Ss9. denied tina.
been standing ny punishment without com.
plHins and Without attempting to ice from the
when was the subject OF marriage first
Il think 4 was when she FIRST spoke of the
YOU h.y. s.id that 4 .paes.ap.n. eeny:r;
had occurred between the plaintiff and Mr..
Rodes as reason why marriage between you
was I'm possible Tell us what you said on that
" told her." said Col Breckenridge, that
iei Hn I.ations with NJ Rod.. ana thas AFTER ter
she had bled Mr. Rodss for three years and
Or whom i could take into my family
msrrisd to man who SsS had hinf illicit s.atoRs
with her: that she would always be- believing
her that there Was no hs pplnsss SetW.en p ps
pie who had maintainsd Illicit relations unless
ad n said S. nsT soa r.sons
Away: think that she was lnsim a!s with other
was . bright. intellectual woman. who asso-
state. and thSs she lived smop psoP reputable
people at rsputable places. ead that their re.
,ttions were not known In the world In which
Now" said Judge Wilson. so far as these
things are conosrnsd. there never was an I'm
That was only email dust in the balance"
son: thai 40; there re- never was any promise Of
Ana a:o SoS to on s.S T tsae
and the plaintiff agreed to the sem blance of an
engagement: that you mutually axrsed to say
that you were engaged. and mutually agreed
that there shouL. be an appearances Of an en-
gsgement It l am wrong correct me-"
one person. and that person was Mrs Eleanor
there : :Sous 'ss .nsha as Eo mar;
fis..s explain til. nature of tina. arrange
There was an agreement that We should go
70 MaIor Moore and make certain statement
alter had threatened IN his presence to turn
her oyer to the police. The agree N emit as to
81 ssns 10 SI.
not solely for the purpose of dscsivinR her.
Our purpose was to separate this woman and
Wa hington. and in order to do 90 had agreed
10 the deception did not ask Mrs. Black burn
.unmsr Ny resoiisetion and Mrs. Black.
burns disagree. although both Of US are prob
,Siy trying honestly to testify according to our
,lacss her S't UNDER Mrs. BlsefSurns psots Ss
that sa %tas i think he S1S:5
'rr But you 40 saSss.sS the DisiSIifi in Mrs.
:, u; I'D not The c.rss'ss given were
Col BreckinridE. said that he went to New |
FORK on April -. the day he was married.
Judge Wilson handed him copy OF the mar |
'ol: Breekinridgs acknowledged iilling out the |
and In AnBwer to Judge Wilson he |
aid that he had been married twice before the |
naarrIage 20 Mrs; Wing st..
10 yo9 write IN this certificate that 1t was Your
:" When / started to write that" said Col
asked II / should write In
low N any times had been married. and DIR. |
'axton said tn. number WAS not necessary. SO
wrote IL in thong htlessly"
:" gu fllsd In all tho certificate then p
A" did. Dr. Paxton WAS suffering from q
eryous headache. and he asked me TO do the
TritinE. TO which l at first lAughinRly do
nurrsd. saving IL was hard for man TO Ill In
- Did you make any request to DIR. Paxton to
esp this marriage secreti Did you request
i'm not to put the certificate on record Pc
Il told him 70 keep IL secret until fall. II
GU want me to tell you why. will do 50"
Never mind" said Judge Wilson. when
Id your public marriage take place."
ON the 18th OF July following"
Did you not then .eiisgraDh to DR. Paxton
II think not; but think wrote to him and