New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1894-07-01

COMPANY runs a glow ship, why should not the
North German Lloyd. sailing the same day, send
a fast one and vlce-versl? When the Chester
sails from Southampton, why should not tHc
Lucania or Campania be appointed to leave Liv-
erpool? What IS gained by having two slow
ships on one day and two fast ships on another?
If there is any reason why the companies should
not agree among themselves to remedy TINS
fault the public Is not aware Of II. The public
pays at a very high rate for letter-carrying and
it might not be amiss that its interests should be
considered
There IS another point; the hour Of sailing from
Ncw-York We used to be told that the tides
regulated this. but 1t Is now announced that the
Paris and New-Yorl5, two Of the deepest-draught
steamers. Will leave regularly at Il in the morn
Ing. II they can others can. But the Campania
sailed last Saturday at D. m. and afternoon
sallings are frequent. They usually mean de-
ley Z a whole day IN the delivery Of malls in Lon
don; in the cas-. Of a saturday ship delay Of
two days-Monday instead Of Saturday. Nor is
II O'Clock early enough. It should be 9. or even
o'clock otherwise. the delivery IS doubtful The
late saings are probably meant for the conven-
iorce Of passengers. II the objection Of few hum
drcd passengers II carly rising be sufficient
reason for retarding the correspondence OF two
hundred millions Of people from one to two or
three days there Is more 10 be said But If that
be the true reason. think II ought to be stated;
as the reason for the other arrangement Of all
slow or all fast ships. ought to be stated Then
W. shall know whether the public have any
rights. or whether the convenience Of n few and
the private interests II shpowners.--or perhaps
only their carecssness-are 10 prevail
Mr. Justice Wright. a very coo-headod man,
has been telling the Grand Jury at Exeter a story
Of Lord Cocrlge. Very early in life h. defended
n prisoner charged with murder. So powerful
was his speech that the judge adjourned the
court for a quarter q an -FOUR 10 give the jury
time to from the effect Of :hs cioquence.
The result IS not stated. ono Journal speaks ~
this incident as unique ard the compliment
as unique; the adjournment asked for after
SheriIans speech IN the Warren Hastings
trial being cited as the only precedent 1t
may be- doubted whether the incident BE- 50 rare
as that or the compliment equal to that which
Mr.. Bright paid Lord Coerdge Mr.. Bright said
70 me that the most 'beauiifu' speech he had
over heard was from Lord Colerllge He evil
IDENTIFY chose his adjective with care a. was mis-
habit
spoke u Mr.. Justice Wright as cool but
there IS ~ denying that on this occasion he
spoke with warmth His eulogy upon the late
Lord chief Justice goes beyond any other which
I have seen lie ala not hesitate to describe him
as on, of the two or three most distinguished
- all the personalities IN England In plain
words be t. bc put beside Mr. Gladstone
and Lord Salsbury.-th1se being the two names
which this learned Judge mentioned. Morally
an intellectually. as well as physically no one
VAS his superior" As the report is abbreviated.
the real sense may De- cvteale1 often hap
r.r4 II Mr. Justice Wright be accurately re-