The herald. [microfilm reel] (Los Angeles [Calif.]) 1893-1900, 1894-02-24

hnhCo lOILHbu 20 years hsO, oho OlhF Nv
torney having decided that the old con-
tract still held good.
Mr.. Munson then moved the suspen-
sion of the rules and that the ordinance
be adopted.
Mr.. Gaffey inquired if the matter
might be laid over.
President Teed stated that there
should be no delay.
Mr.. Gaffey said he had no time to
study the ordinance, and thought it
should be laid over until Monday next;
the proposed change was a big one and
should not be hurried.
Mr.. Munson said that if the member
from the Eighth ward could suggest any
better ordinance he was with him, but
he had studied the matter for year,
and thought the proposed changes were
good the ordinance should be adopted.
The water rate should be 80 per cent
lower than it is. Unless the city had
its own plant there never would be
cheaper rate. He was in favor OF taking
up this matter as soon ae the work on
the outfsll sewer WAS concluded.
The rules were then suspended.
Mr.. Nickel admitted he hadn't
studied the new ordinance thoroughly.
He thought that public sentiment was
against the present rates.
The vote was then taken, all voting
for the adoption. Passed.
Mr.. Nickel then presented the sup
Elemental contract with Messrs. Grant
and Mansfield. The city attorney, he
said. had failed to embody certain
specifications in the contract which
made the amendment necessary. The
contract provided for the retention OF
$4,000 from the contract price, for six
months, to be used in any repairs that
might be needed in sections and Ga Of
the outfall sewer, per cent to be paid
if no repairs needed, no interest to be
paid if any repairs are made.
Mr. Nickel moved the approval OF the
contract.
The interest clause was struck out,
after which the contract was approved.
A recess of fifteen minutes was then
taken.
The Temple street assessment report
was then presented.
Mr.. Innes moved it be referred to the
board of public works.
Mr.. iced moved to lay the report upon
the table.
Adopted.
A motion by Mr.. Gaffsy to reconsider
the motion was lost.
Council then adjourned.
The report is as follows:
THE TEMPLE STREET REPORT.
The commissioners Tor the regarding
of Temple and intersecting streets beg
leave to make the following preliminary
report, in accordance with the request
OF your honorable body:
In compliance with the instructions
given to US by the city attorney we have
not assessed any of the properties which
were awarded benefits and damages by
the judge and jury who tried the ITEM
pie street cases."
The total amount levied by us in the
following assessment 10 SIG, 1872 So, of
which amount $115. 459 3S are damages
awarded by Judge and jury, and $l263. l5
costs OF court in said cases.
This assessment does not include the
cost of grading said Temple and inter-
secting streets. which will probably be
about $l7 800.
As noted above, this assessment is
only preliminary, and ia merely in
tended to give an approximate idea OF
the ASSESSMENTS which will be levied by
Us upon the various properties in said
conclude to order said work proceeded
with. sf
Bellevue Temple tract, block l, lots
to g.. $40; lots 6 to II, $l2; lots IL to
20. $40; lots 20 and 81, 81.
Bellevue Temple tract, block 2-Lots
to 8, 500; lots 6 to IL, $l2 lots IL to
%, $40; lots 26 and 81, 81.
Bellevue Temple tract, block 3-Lots
to 5, $40; Lots 6 to IL, $12: lots IL to
rs, $40; lots 26 and q, 81.
Temple tract, block 4.
Lots to 5, $40; lots 6 to IL, $12; lots
IL to %, $40; lots rs and 81, 81.
Diamond-street tract, block l.
Lots to g. $40; lots 4, 5. 6, $12; lots
to 20, $40; lots 81 to 20, $l2; lots "a to
,26, 500.
Diamopd.street tract, block s.
Lots l, Q, 3, $40; lots 4. 5. 6, $12; lots
7 to 20, $40; lots 81 to IS, SIP; lots "a to
&c, 500.
Diamond-street tract, block 8.
Lots l, 2, 3. $40; lots 4, 5. g. $12; lots
to 20, $40; lots 81 to 90, $l2; lots "a to
26, 500.
Diamond-street tract block 10.
Lots l. 2, 3, $780, lots 4, 5. 8, $12; lots
to 20, $40; lots 81 to %, $l2; lots "a to
26, 500.
Acme tract. block /, lots to z, SIS:
lots to 10. $17; lots IL to IT, $25; lots
16 to Is. $3.50; lots 10 to %, SIS; lots 2
to "a, SIS.
Acme tract, block 2, lots 8 to 7, SIS;
lots 8 to 10, $780, lots IL tolls, $25
lots 16 to Is, $3.50; lots 10 to 20, SIS;
lot q. tract part, So; lot "a, S..
Gable Road tract, block A lots to
IA, 500; lots Is to %, SIG.
Gable Road tract, block B lots l to
IA, $40; lots Is to %, SIG.
Gable Road tract, block O; lots l to
IA. SIG; lots Is to %, s12.
Gable Road tract. block D; lots l to
IA, s16; lots Is to 2s. $12.
East half of lot 3, Hsncock's survey,
1896; North half OF block 7, Hancock's
survey, $1792; south half OF block 2, II.
s., $l792; lot l, block 80, H. s., $3.50;
lots. block 80, II. s., 5000; lot l. block
~, 81. s., 1881; lot 8, block 27, H. s.,
1891.
Los Angeles Improvement company's
subdivision OF part Of lot 4. block 80,
Hancock's survey; lots to 7, SIP; lots
8 to 10, SIG; lots IL and IL. $25; lots 81
to 81, SIP; lots IS to Is, $25; lots IL to
10, SIC; lote 20 to $34, $12.
Los Angeles improvement company
subdivision, block b, lots / to 23; SIS.
Los Angeles Improvement company's
subdivision, block A, lots L to IA; SIS.
Highland tract, lot of block A;