New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1894-11-01
THE RIG RES.

Now senator Hill says that if New DIX ana
Hrooklvn will do ~ well IL usual he Will b"
elected That i Il confession Of defeat. lie
knows that New York and Brooklyn VIII noi
give ANYTHING like the one hundred thousand
puraljtv they CAV" for Cleveland though IN"
registration is about Is large. ana The vol" VIII
probably h., rs large ~ IN the PRESBYTERIAN
wear New York last fall clli down ID" pluiahV
for Maynard to less than $1,000. Will" Brooklyn
gave Il plurality Of 1000 against nm fllll j
simply the author of the Grim" for which May
parl was punished In NrWlork the Maynard
vor. WAS 5000 less than The vote for '"Ve-
land while the vote against him WIS only 300"
less than the vote for Harrison. In Brook
lvn The vote for Maynard was 1000 leSs ihan
the vote for Cleveland while the vote against
him WAS 5OuO greater than the vote for liar-
riSon.
Mr.. Hill imagnr- that ON National i>-ues he
can now escape the loss Which STATE and local
ISSUES involved last year But the reform move
ment in This city appears relatively ~ Strong
as The movement against Body aud his ilng
IN 1892, when $1,000 Democrats voted III BROOK
lvu for Republican Mayor. About ".OOo more
II Will be- noticed. voted Il Rrpublcan uch"i III
local than in State affairs. The vote east III
New-York for Maynard last year was largely
fraudulent. aS everybody knows, ana the mn
ORANGES 10 Democratic fraud are greater III ms
city than they have been for many years before
The great uprising against the infamic' OF Tam.
many government will sweep thousands into op
position to the Democratic candidate for GOV
oruor because his success would build bar
rcr against Tammauys overthrow. who did not
vote against Maynard last year
Al the worst aud biggest. the strict Tamnany
vote i'm This city is not 1OOOOO. An mpudrni.
shameless and criminal minority has seized and
held the government and plundcrcd the town.
The. MAYNARD vote included many thousands
who are not for Tanmany to-day. and who have
little sense if they try 10 throw off the fctterS of
Taluuanv Hall while clcctng Hill Governor II
would he more. reasonable 10 expect That Tam
many and Hill would both get fewer votes in
New-Yorb this year than Maynard received Il
year ago.
Bu the Maynard vote would nol save either
About 2SJ.UO0 votes should be- cast, ~ in The
Presidential election, when less Than llV"o
voted the Socialist. Prohibition and Peoples
tickets Last year about $4,000 wasted their
votes in that way. This leaves from 21o,Ooo To
10000 votes for the main tickets. The May
nard vote would fall 10000 short Of II plurality
in New-YOrk Can Hill or Tammany, after all
the exposures Of the last year east a. many
votes aS were cast for Maynard? In Brooklyh
the MAYNARD vote was about 10000 short OF
plurality last year. Can the same ring led by
Maynard's instigator and protector. east as
| many votes now as lie got then!
| Mr.. Hill will plead IN vain 10 New York ANA
| Brooklyn for their usual Democratic maloricS.
because they are engaged this year in casting off
| the Infamous deSpotsm of which h. is the lead
| or and champion. If he and his rings can mus
| ter 100000 votes in the two cities, ont of 4FpoD
| east. il will be 1hr-ugh fraud ana amazing s'u-
| pidity Of the voters besides. The two rings,
which are essentially one with Hill as le head,
| actually haN" about 100000 votes, ana 10y IN
| posing the stupidity and the partiSanNhip OF
some people may swell that force 10 some cN-
| tent. but Il straight and fair vote would show
a majority of more Than 1000 In each city
| against them