The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1894-06-02
HEARD IN COURT.


Charles n. Chese of Boston petitioned
Cor . privilege In the Rhode Island
Supreme Court today and Judge Iilling-
hast said wait" Then Charles III. Chase
camo down into the court house corridor
and said that he would do as he
liked In spite Of all the judges In the land
tion BY chasing his i6-year
old daughter, whom the court had decided
he had no right to see.
IL was In the divorce case OF Amy Reed
Chacs ys. Charles chace. The wife i
receiyed decree in the Rhode
the ground of desertion, her husband
having left her before the daughter,
Catherine Pauline, was born.
Today the case was again heard on mo-
fion Of the respondent for modification
OF the decree In such manner that he
would be allowed to see his child and this
was the motion that the court held for
After the dismissal OF the case the
father came down stairs and waited in
the corridor on the lower floor until
the mother and daughter came down
Catherine and Catherine jumped and
screamed and ran through an open
door into Deputy Harris room, followed
by her mother. The father did not fol-
low because he was surrounded by half
. dozen other deputies threatening him
y, with no,ss either arrest o.n;a for contempt ;t
on to College Hill. After a few moments
MIR. Chace left tho corridor and the ex-
citement was at ane end.
Since Mrs. Chace received her decree OF
divorce in the Rhode Island Court all
the parties concerned have moved
permanently. In view OF that fact the
question was whether or not
Rhode Island juseice had
Jurisdiction in the matter and Judge
Tillipghast continued the hearing until
he should decide on the matter Of loca-
tiop.
An Interesting Opinion.
An opinion was handed down today in
the case of Annie T.. Burgess VS.. John +.
Muldoon, which is in favor of the plain
tin. Mrs. Burgess bought q lot Of land,
in her own name, in 1878. In 1890 she
became divorced, but In the meantime
Muldoon had agreed to buy the
land in question. After the divorce he
refused to carry out the agreement claim
ing that plaintiffs title was not clear be-
cause OF the interest which the husband
still had.
Judge Tillinghast rules that the di-
vorced husband has no title what
ever to the land purchased by his
plainant in the case. Is entitled to the
relief for which she petitiones.
Docket for June 4.
lCommon Pleas Division.I
685. William Booth ct ux. VS.. w. H.
Trafton. Attorneys-A. j. Cushing for
plaintiff; Osfield Banigan for defend-
SS5. John Mooney VS.. James H. Host
ler: Attorneys-H. J. Carroll for plain
fif; T. w. Robinson for defendant.
49o6. Mantle Mills Co. VS.. Riverside q
Thurston for plsintiff; Miner Il Rocker
and r.. M. Burbank for defendant.
950. Thomas Mahon VS.. Samuel s. Dur
lee. Attorneys McGuinness & Doran for
plaintiff; s. o. Edwards for defendant.
6719. Mary Gallagher pro ami vs. Prov
Dubois for plaintiff; X. g. Mowry for de-
,fAppeliate Division.l
1916. Arthur p. Summer vs.. N. Y. p. q
B. n. r.. Co. ttorneys-Comstock Il
Gardner for complainant; w. B. Vincent
sb5o. G. +. Sanford vs.. Harriet A. Coy
yoeeph s. q. Cobb for complainant; Page
q Owen for respondent.
Other Court Matters.
3 Co. vs. Amos r.. Emo the attorneys for |
both sides appeared in the appellate di- |
vision today and filed an agree
m6nt to dismiss the case without |
costs and to dissolve the injunction here |
tofore granted and restraining the sale of
"A rescript was handed down DENYING
the defendants petition for new trial OF |
the case OF William Jester against the |
water works.
In the two cases of Hugh O'Donnell w.
William White, trustee, an order was
onterod directing the closing of the COM
plainents testimony.
Print Works Company vs. Rodney f. |
Dyer ct a., on the issues framed by both
parties.
The complainant in the case of Peter
DonneIly w. Michael Linsmore ct al. filed
his issues, and the respondents are allowed
one week In which to do the same.
The Cross claims OF Manuel Veta and /
Joaquin ID Nascimento on book account
Involving 500 were heard by Judge
Rogers today on a motion for Judgment
and execution. The plaintiff and de-
fendsnt submitted their dispute
to to Hiram e,.s B. Wood stsphs-
Anthony OF East Providence as referees.
Irving Champlin, counsel for defendant,
took exception to the decision of referees
and hence brought the case to court.
The case of Coombs a Atkinson VS..
Joseph B. Patterson was heard today be-
fore Judge Wilbur and held for advise
ment-
DR.. weksrle's Successor.
VIENNA, June e.-Count Hedervary has
gone to Buda-P Pesth to consult with lead
Ing statesmen In regard to the formation
Of . new ministry. He will not finally de-
eide 20 assn me the premiership until he
has received the assurance of the support
Of Dr. Wekerle and the whole Liberal