The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1894-07-01
. plalatlf wilhdrays first cause OF

uled plaintiff sishdrays first cause Of
Seattle Brewing and Mating Company
kurz and King-Demarrer 20 com
plant. confessed. ten days 10 amend
sneafe, receiver. vs.. SawtsiIe ct ai.-Mo-
non 70 pay costs. granted.
Andrews Va Gibson es al-Dsmurrer Of
tlnued
Clark vs. Uhiman st ux--Demurrer 20
second cause Of action: sustained; twenty
days to amend.
Carrie ". Wright ct ai.-Findings Of fact,
conclusions OF Law and decree: signed
Kelly VS. Rose es aL--Motion for APP
pointment Of receiver; granted; r NJ.
rainier appointed; bond fixed n 81. 90.
hui Va Robbins e al.-Continned TO
September l.
Lsck Va Lowman-Stricken.
smith vs.. Akin ct al two casesb-De-
fault OF c. B. Walsworfh.
causes were set for trial a. follows:
Dock Vs. Mackay CT aI.-September
Ewing va. Wilson ct gI.-Septsmber 5.
BOWMAN vs.. Martin ct al.-Septemcer b
Minor vs. L. III. Griffith L. and b. Co. ct
a.-September g.
Williams vs.. Nssrath ct al.-Septem-
Der s.
Hood vs.. Aegrath ct al-september6
Seattle National Bank VS.. Blaine Elec-
the Light Company ct aL-september 10
In re Kenyon estate, w. W. Moore ct
~. vs.. A. L. Palmer ct ai.-September IL
Bond vs.. McLachlan ct al.-Septem-
Der Is.
CRIMINAL NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS.. J.
Smith VS.. Michel ct .-Defendants' mo-
ton and demurrer; sustained.
tochrsne VS.. Day Bros.-Motion for
change Of venue and demurrer; continued.
huppler. receiver, VS.. brengan-Motion
to ssrlke; granted in part.
Washington National Bank vs. Mer-
chants National Bank Motion 70 dis
charge garnishes and for attorneys fees;
Merchants National Bank VS.. Rise
dorph-Demurrer to plaintiffs complaint;
overruied
Bradeen vs. Puget Sound National Bank
as garnishee-Motion 10 require defendant
to deliver personal property: stricken.
Doran vs.. Rodman and Keith-PlaintlfFs
motion to strike answer of b. j. Keith
from files: continued.
Coblentz, Pike d Co. VS.. Mrs. r. Pike
Defendants motion 10 strike summons
and complaint; denied plaintiff permitted
to vsyify.
Ritterhoff VS.. Chalk ct al.-Demurrer to
complaint; stricken.
Bank of British Columbia vs.. Sander ct
al.-Detendants' demurrer to complaint;
waived.
Isham vs. Letts-PiaintifFs motion for
default and judgment and defendants
motion to correct complaint; denied; de-
PENDANT permitted 10 answer upon pay
men. of $50 and all costs.
Nelson vs. West Shore Land Company
Motion for default and judgment; granted.
Fenner VS.. Pauison ct al.--Motion to
strike cost bond from files; denied.
Ballard VS.. Mcknight ct ai.-Motion to
sell stock of garnishee, ]. i. Mcknight;
granted.
Ballard VS.. Furth ct al.-Motion to sell
stock of garnishee; granted.
Commercial National Bank VS.. Heston
ct ai.-Defendent ordered to file answer
forth with.
Williamson vs. Williamson ct ai.-De-
PENDANT Williamsou's motion against
plaintiffs complaint: defendentant j. r.
Wiliiamson's motion against plaintih's
complaint; continued until defendant
pays alimony heretofore ordered.
Fleming Il Ayerst Company ct al. vs..
Great Northern Railway Conpany-Mo-
ton of defendant railway company to
make complaint more definite and certain; .
to require plaintiffs to elect between parts
thereof and to strike there.rom; denied.
Scott ct nj. VS.. Rainier Power & Rail-
way Company ct aI.-Receiver's motion
for new trial; denied.
Perkins VS.. North End Bank ct al
Motion to strike complaint; denied.
Hart VS.. Livermore--Defendant mo-
ton for new trial; denied.
Collins vs.. Jewell ct aL-Motion for new
trial; denied.
Collins VS. Johnson ct ux.-Motion for
new trial; continued.
State of Washington vs.. Frank II.
Minsch-Motion for q new trial; contin-
ued.
State of Washington VS.. G. p. Bishop es
al.--Bail fixed at 81 900 each.
Mary NJ. Miller VS.. Washington South