Wheeling Sunday register. [volume] (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1882-1934, 1894-01-14
, ,. & Of sugar. witness said he presumed

sales Of sugar. witness said he presumed"
MIR. Reilly
CLAIMED CREDIT FOR 1T
because no had pushed witness up on his
collections
Witness was then asked about the Mrs.
" Connor matter, in tho particular OF
when Mr. Reilly had asked witness TO 20
10 Mrs. O'Cohnor 10 find out IL she had
hept up the interest on the prior lien, and
witness said he went 10 Col O'Brien first,
knowing he had the notes, aud then
won't 10 Mrs O'Connor. MIR Reilly had
not told him 10 90 10 Col. O Brien.
Witness aud MIR Schulz had the combi-
hAton orthe Office safe, aud he did not
know that James had the combination.
James bad asked witness 10 ODen the safe
ana had also given witness money 70 put
10. Witness thought no one was especially
responsible Tor the cash, but he thought
the cashier would be responsible. or.
kellly would 20 10 the safe aud take money
especially never saying anything about
silver. and this had made trouble for the
cashier by making money short The
cashier would settle IL oy charging the
shortage up 70 Mr.. Reilly.
As 10 the s. 600 notes, shown 10 witness
FRIDAY, he said TWO Of them were renewal 8,
aud were put ia Oank because they needed
money. Witness knew nothing Of a &, 600
loan when they did not need the money, as
that WAS during Mr.. Whites time
Recurring 10 witness visit 20 Mr..
Reiily's about the renewal OF the $1,000
note, on December u, 1891, witness said ha
did not know why Mr. Reilly did not sign
note, instead of wanting witness 10 make
a note he had no power 10 make under the
power OF attorney, or having witness
nix IL up some way" Witness did not
tnlnk Mr.. Reilly was able 10 sign his name
that day
When James Reilly was away at Mt.
Clemens, MCssrs. Schulz and Devin took
James place and did what he had been do
ing.
Witness said during Mr.. Reilly's life.
time there were no book accounts OF adyRu-
COS made 70 Mr. ReIlly's children. That was
as true OF tho time after June 20, 1891, as be-
fore. The only accounts kept were with
the boys as employees, and
oN JUST THE SAME FOOTING
as other employees.
As TO the prop rty on the South Side
which the witness Richie had testified 70
as being reutaDlc at about SIS "a month,
witness had no knowledge OF improve
mcuts having been made since the time OF
which MIR Richie spoke, except the put
ting IN Of water closet.
James and john and Thomas posted wit
ness on the Chicago property. talking with
him aud explaining the lay oil the land. etc.
Witness knew nothing about the Union
knowledge uf the Proviso Land AssOcia-
ton. He know Bishop liain and Father
sullivan bad cancelled a su description 20 IL
by Mr.. Reilly, but never saw the papers.
Az times Mr. Rc.ly's hearing was re-
marHaby good, but his eyessht was not
very good. 'Mr. Reilly, as rule
held on 10 the paper, after he first rot it,
until dinner time. / never knew anyone
that got hold OF He was not al.
ways asleep, but he held on to the paper,
whether asleep or awake, and IN the even
ing be took IL home with him Wit
ness had read the paper TO Mr. Reilly sew
era! tmes. lie went 20 sleep once or
twice, and stopped reading. and he opened
mis- eyes and told me 20 20 on.
tl-Did YOU read him 10 sleep again A.
i think not; be had his eyes open. =
/ am willing 10 testify i did not read IL TO
him over three times. 10 was during the
pOutica. campaign, and nc was
INTERESTED ~ PJILrIcs.
james V. Reilly represented the concern
in the Wholesale Grucegs' Association, uc-
Cording TO witness recollection. Witness
thought he suggested Jacob FoOses name
tu take account OF the stoci, Of tobacco ho
thought ne suggested both the names.
81 ltacss got a 900 salary all the time he
was AT the store. The executor now paid
Si,21J At Mr.. Rel!ys his hours were
from "a nI. 10 p. m. Now he got there
AZ 30. IA. ana ne left about $3.50 p. N. IL
was likely witness could do all the work at
present lu two hours u day. He was do
ing no other work for Bishop Kahn ana
Father sullivan during business hoIrs.
Glow much are they paying you for
thai. Al don't tuiuE that has anything
10 do with tte case, but I'm answer il IL 1
have 20. u his Honor directs me to an
sWer 10 I'LL do 1t. The work | am doing
/ have been engaged IN Tor great many
years.
Q.-N5w that YOU have answered so much
perhaps You Will not object TO stating the
rest Of IT, Ar the Court directs me to
do So will Does tine Court direct mct
The Court thought that inasmuch as be
had made partial answer of his own aC-
cord, hc could conclude, and the witness
said he got nothing for his extra work
Wines lad not suggested at one time TO
the executor that hIs salary be reduced,
and 1t mad not been done, but witness had
objected 10 having bis sa.ary reduced,
under certain conditions.
ABOUT LETTER
Odd you not suggest TO some person
that lu case your salary was reduced bv
The executor YOU proposed 90 charge for
the services YOU rendered the Churcht a.
II don't know that / did.
Q-But uId YOU not say that, somehow,
at some time, TO some Onc' Al may have
done so.
Witness produced n letter which he said
he would like TO read as bearing upon
this matter, AID read il oy leave, as ex-
pa mug his answers. 10 was from James
y. Reilly, and among other things said:
81 don't know what the executors ideas
arc as o. the books, after the business =
settled UP. but j hardly think that thew
Will want 90 seep a 0ook.kceper on full
time. u you could get another set of books
TO keep, or something like insurance bust
ness, ! suppose we could arrange 10
MIR. Hubbard then said there was an
another letter in existence which ought 20
be read. BOO that same connection, but that
tue essential part OF 10 was 10 tho hands Of
Father sullivan.
"No, 10 is uot,' said Mr. Russell, 81
have it,
"NlI. you are Father Sullivan for the
purpose oil This letter. said Mr.. Hubbard.
SIR. Russell made some half-audi BILE re-
tort-somcth.ug about hi5 having no
knowledge that he he had been admitted 90
the ChrIr. or 1mctuiug like that and
finally handel fo the witness the second
a. cen ol q t.pe-wri ten letter, signed by
Witness There was some enquiry rs 10
Wu ne tte tr.t sheet was. and MIR. James
Is .Ur produced 10 from his pocket book.
and It was handed 20 witness. 10 was da-
ted August" I-3.. and in The latter portion
OF tue letter. Witness had written he was
az ira same oplu.ou' Mr. Reilly was. and
fHut 'lt probably would not Justify tho ex-