Morning journal and courier., 1894-01-13
oouaT nEoonD.
Supreme Court of Errors.

|
 
 Supreme Court of Errors.
 The supreme court of errors will con vene in this city next Tuesday. The fol- lowing New Haven court cases are on the docket:
 Old cases-The state of Connecticut VI. Terrence Brady. appeal by defendant; Ns- thaniel Sleeman vs. the National Gss Sav- ing company ct d.; CIV. Blskesles & Sons VI Anthony Carroll, appeal by defendant; Alvsn Talcott ct al, trustee, vs. George E. Meies, appeal by plaintiff; the Waterbury Manufacturing company vs. the Pbnaix Manufacturing eompany,appeal by defend ant (aot to be argued this term); William Cothren vs. Rodsrick Atwood. appeal by plaintiff.
 New caseu-The state of Connecticut VI. John Keens, appeal by defendant; the Yale Gas Stove company vs. Jededish Will COX ct ux., reservation; Jededish Wilcox vs. John B. Foley, reservation; Charles O. Ford vs. Joseph E Hub,nger, appeal by defendant; Annis J. Lord vs. Frank B Russell, appeal by defendant; the state of Connecticut vs. George Bassett, appeal by defendant; Wallace E Johnson ct ux vs. Samuel Norton, appeal by defendant; the borough of Wallingford vs. Henry F. Hall, appeal by plaintiff (not to be argued this term). fs superior Court - Civil Side - Judge Wheeler.
 At the short calendar session of this court yesterday g number of important motions and questions of pleadings were argued. ,s
 THE TREAT { SHEPARD SUIT. In the suit of the Treat & Shepard com pany against John N. Kellogg of Water bury e motion for special bail made by Attorney Penney, counsel for the plaintiffs was granted, aud bail to the amount of $7,0O0 ordered to be given within ten days. i. =.
 BOND TO PROSECUTE. A bond to prosecute of $10 was ordered filed in the suit of Martin A. Holden vs. Edgar 0. Stiles Holden, who was school ooy, was logged by Stiles, who is the prin- cipal of the Seymour high school. Holden l felt that Stiles overdid the Aogging, and brought suit through Attorneys Hamilton and Ssorrs to recover $l,000 from his sshoolmaster. Wooster, Williams & Gager appeared for Stiles.
 REDEMPTION OF A MORTGAGE. 1 The first Tuesday in March was set ss the limit of time for D. Edgar Smith to redeem e mortgage of $1,000 held by Browning & Co.,, on his property in Msdi- son. .s..
 In the suit brought by J. Hazslton Cook, | jr, of Guilford, to recover $25, 900 from Luzon B Morris, executor of the estate of the late Daniel Hand, the Guflford million aire, a demurrer to the complaint was argued by J. W. filling for the defendant and ex Judge Pickett for the plaintiff Decision was reserved.
 Decision was also reserved in demurrer to plea in abatement in George l. Minors appeal from actions of the county commis- sioners. The plea was argued by Attorney Williams for Minor, and Attorneys Kleiner and O'Neil for the defendant. s~ CASE AaITATINa wATEBBURY's SOCIETY
 The divorce case of George A. Driggs vs. Annie Driegs of Waterbury, came up on e motion for non-suit for failure to com- ply with the order of the court. The mo-
 tion was not granted. A motion by ex. Judge Lynde Harrison to expunge certain
 portions of the complaint was granted. Colonel Burpee of Waterbury is named ai , correspondent in the case. .. The document that Mir. Terry did fils
 Judge Harrison said simply alleged that on
 divers days from 1891 to 1893 the defend.
 ants was guilty of improprieties in New York city and in Waterbury, and that for three years she had been habitually in temperate. He called Mir. Terry's atten tion to the fact that the bill was lacking and asked for 6 more specific statement Thereupon MT. Terry replied that he would not furnish a more specific statement, and that if he, MT. Harrison, wanted one hs
 must put tho matter on the short calendar
 and get an order from the court. MT. liar
 rison then explained how Judge Hall had hc statement, and then went on to cay tha, F the document filed in compliance witt
 that order was not what Judge Hall had directed to be filed. Tho portion
 of the answer he wished to have expunRed
 MT. Harrison said, was the last paragraph ? which set up that on the blank days iI 1 July and August, 1893, the defendant ws,
 guilty of improper conduct. He said fur
 ther that the exact time and place of thu alleged aots must be set up in order that th, defendant might be prepared to show
 where che was at the time in question
 The plaintiff, Mir. Harrison said in oonclu
 sion, must not expect that he can depend D on the gossip of floating tramps to prove his charges against this lady of standing = wealth and intelligence.
 , In reply to MT. Harrison's statements Ar. Bronson, junior counsel for the peti
 tioner, was very brief but cutting. H' said that MT. Harrison had indulged in [ ? lot of ancisnt history and his usual insinu
 stions, but that it would have no weigh
 in the matter under discussion. The fac was, he ssid, that he was unable to stat. any more specifically the places, dates and time when the alleged offences were com mitted. The people who were tc testify 1T the case he said, were not the kind ths ; | were looking for notoristy in such cases and if they knew moro definitely they wer, unwilling to say so.
 Judge Wheeler, after hearing the argu ments, promptly granted Mr. Hsrrisoni ; motion.
 The following cases were assigned fol . trial:
 7 Tuesday, Jan. 16 The C. & 0. Motor Co. vs. D Frisbie & Go.
 Wednesday, Jan. 17-SamueI Rothchild ct ux l vs. the Fair Haven and Westville R. R. Go. Thursday, Jan. 1s-Corey Downs Go. vs l Stetn
 Tuesday Jan. as-ohittenden's appeal iron
 Tuesday Jan. 30-Ball vs.the American Oyste, Co.
 City Court-Crlminal Side-Judg II Callahan.
 Arkon, Ra nov, Rn 5.r. l.,