Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1894-10-10
MURRAY MURDER.
Carries Tb.eds Is Accused Of Tdsil5
his WIl5s LIE.
rnE EnrASELlss OF A JURY


i,cuon by the Defense.
Charles ThleIe, the Murray taloon-
keeper, alter iyiug IN ilI i3r upwards
% i've months, was placed upou rial
'at hi- life Ia JuIgo Baftch's division
OF the rhiri duiric, court this morn.
in'. Toe ie.un .ani has been indicted
Tor he wilIul murder OF bi, wife, Mary
lhiede, a. their homs at Murray, on
Apfii alih OF The present year, BY
cutting her thfo,t.
IhicIc was brought up from the
county jail ~ deputy sheriff anoriy
before 10 O'Clock. IL wore DARK suit
o. clothes aud appeared 90 have devoted
careful attention " his ronofnl appear.
Aucr, which has undergone "a great
change TT the better since the time OF
his arrest rhiUdc has tue reputation
Of having been hard drinkor IN his
lime, snd his loolu i've or xix months
Aso served 10 csrfOuoalu this impres.
llou; but his detention Ia the county
jail nGs worked wouders, anu thosn
vino formerly knew tho man would
Low at hpt glance hardly recognize
him rs thr same prrsol. Hoin seated
IUIuy between his counsel, Judge a.
y. Cherry and Alr. James Cheffy, Of
the law firm Of CAofry gnd Cherry,
auu, while listening closely @ all tue
necessary p.ulimluaries that went for
wRrd duuug tnu forenoon, he ala not
seuui in ANY way 10 realize the lefTluis
charge now hanging over bis heed.
The prosecution IL IN tho hands OF
Assistant District Attorney Howsi,
.nuHt EHsiduousiy on the case tor sew
weeks past. While Judge
| uru.st viii n9L Of course, leave n
| Howl iprne1 10 secure conviction,
stone uh' Nrry clam that they will
Messfs. Cnt. Sa.t convincing deienss
put forward a M ul OF the best fe-
anu thereby are hOl>
sultH iOT their client. selection OF
| itisexpectel that theeNxiii be
jury to- Try Thlodo no more
lVug anu tedious business; iAS than
progress Ia made with the u1Ioba.
was the case THIS forenoon, the Nnot
biiities are that tue trial itself wilNxd
begln before "a lato hour tomorrow ~,
tue hearing Will, ~ Ia antlcips..e
occupy fully one week. rhi. m..".
SUNDAY ioI the Jury IN charge OF '"
/, inS--. 'iou isSInAz>nhn.A.az>lhzA.
: iT,orNStbe 6filnaTy Ianer 9
for the September term, srlrc
ton viii DO made from the follOWinI
special vsnirr:
e. \. Favour, John n. Hamilton,
Cha-, SAMSON, J. II. Decker, q. H..
Banks, B. X. HiekOk, Joseph smith,
}. w. Campbell, w. Oltingvr, q. II.
NHnless, rUU'. A. Dunsher, Robt. L..
Anderson, Dayid LsdbrtIeT, jas. a.
brown, Is. 5. Young. 3. d. Cylbrown,
/ >. n. ruiles, Sslt LaEe Guy.
w. T.. wyioy, Oyhir.
A. *. Pouef, W. b, Parrish, Hyrum
Fod, Joseph smith, W.. h. 5utepef,
| CrntuTvllle.
JvI strlnghsm, G. II. Hampton,
James Day, ID U. willis Jr., u. \.
5toker, W, n. Perkins, Bguutifui.
philandu HNcn, Mn. Moss, J. w.
Perkins, Woods Crus'.
\, =. Wotthlngtou, GrAutsyillr.
Ia. A, Seal, +. Is. CLARK, J. H..
RIblnsOu, u. A. Saunders, W. ~. May.
HE'LL, T. h. King w. v. HMghi,
Pennington.
Ruiu- Adams, T.. T.. Ellison, !. n.
Allen, NJ. 81. Whits.Iies, J. H.. Nor
gan, ii. J. Su,ilrld, kAysvillc. Levy
Layton IT,, l. w, LAP ton, j. IA. Bon
uemRri, B. h. Barber kayHyiile
Az sUJu A. tnu uAse was called for
! tfial Judge Query arose aud said!
! The dsfcuuuLt thls iimB objects 10
! icing put on trial, Tor tue reason that
the evidence taken Ia his preliminary
! hearing mas never bucu transcribed
nor hIvI with tho Ulvtk, as provided
! 10y law.
/ THIS motion was at once ovetmled
! by tue court aud an exception noted uy
| counsel for the defense,
Tue tirtjufor called ny tho clerk was
WIN. J. king, but Ghers came no 10.
spouse. Judge BArtch remarked thufu.
upon that ibis WAS Nefy important
trial, anu n any Juror was not present 10
answer when MS name wac called a
bench warrant would issus.
Judge Query hAylnS waived To
call Of MI kinp (whO presented uimselt
later tue empausllug VI jury with.
out hlm proceeded by direction Of the
court,
Twelve gentlemen having taken
their seats Ia tho Jury box Judge
Cherry very bu,ny explained the
charge against the Defendant aud then
went Ola TO examine the jururs ~ TO
their fitness 20 serve. J. n, Miller was
tho met Juror questioned, anu hs re-
NAMED IN thu hauus ~ counsel tGr
.uuy thfuu quarters OF an hour. He
was challenged repeatedly by Judge
Cherry anu the challenge was
strouuousiy resisted by the prosecu.
ZION; bus at length tho court tex.
yus,u" him.
The trial hns attracted q large crowd
OF spectators, vi the chairs, 10th inside
anu outside the bar, being occupied, ami
many remain stgudiDr.
BrOcky LighilOOl's Break.
nro,E,s ITshtF,.t a.. t,,rt,.f..,t