The Manning times. [volume] (Manning, Clarendon County, S.C.) 1884-current, 1894-02-07
mens. and it defeated, yeas 12o,
,orc'1GT

cent. ad valorem, and on barley matt
from 80 per cent. to 35 per cent, was
then voted on and agreed to: Yeas 2O4;
nays la. Separate votes were demand
ed 60 the following amendments,
adoptsd in committee of the whole.
By Johnson (Dem.) Of Ohio, on .hs
amendment providing that the wool
paragraph should take effect August 2.
1894; by; Charles w. Stone (Rep.) OF
Pennsylvania, on the amendment strlk-
ing olt the reciprocity clause OF the
petroy5um schedule, and by several
New York Democrats On the income
tax amendment. The other amend
ments Nnclnding the two important
amenG ments to the sugar schedule, and
those repeating the bounty on sugar
and Putting refined sugar on the free
list) were agreed to. on a viva Voce
vote.
There was a difference of opinion as
to which amendment to the wool sched.
ule shauld be voted on. Johnson's
Democrat of Ohio) provided that the
wool schedule should take effect lmme-
diatelyf after the bill IS passed. This
was agreed to in committee of the
whole, but subsequently, the committee
at Mr;Wilson's instance, adopted an
other amendment Striking out all after
the first three words of the johnson
amendment and inserting August 2.
1894, fnr raw wool, and December 2,
1894, for woollen manufacturers. The
johnson amendment was agreed to-.
The vote was thon taken on Wilson's
first amendment, and it was also car
ried On q standing vote of 205 ayes to
II nays, The second amendment was
also carried on rising vote, ayes l96,
nays az The effect is to fix the date of
the wool schedule at August 2, and OF
the woollen schedule at December 2.
The amendment striking off the pro-
vision regarding reciprocity on petro-
vote. ayes 40, nays a.
On che internal revenue amendm ent,
Cochran asked ii the propositions could
be divided and a separate vote taken
on the income tax feature, but the
Speaker, held that it could not. Cock
ran then called for the yeas and nays
on the entire amendment, and it was
carried amid applause, yeas 1872, nays
so.
The Democrats who voted against the
internal revenue bill with the income
tax feature) were: Bartlett Of New
York., Beltzhoover Of Pennsylvania.
BraWleg OF South Carolina, Campbell
of New York, Causey of DelaWre, Clsn-
cy of New York, Cochran of New
York, Compton of Maryland, Coombs
of New York, Covert of New York,
Cummings of New York, Davey Of
Louisiana. De- Forest OF Connecticut,
Dunn OF New Jersey, Dunphy of New
York. English of New Jersey,
Everett of Massachusetts,, Fielder
of New Jersey, Geissenhatner of New
jersey. Haines of New York, Harter
of Ohio, Hendrix of New York, Lap
ham OF Rhode Island, Lockwood of
New York, Magner of New York, Nc
Aleer of Pennsylvania, McKaig of
PENNSYLVANIA, Mayer of Louisiana,
Mutchler of Pennsylvania, O'Neill of
Massachusetts, Page of Rhode. Island,
Price of Louisiana, Raynor of Mary.
land, Reilly of Pennsylvania, Rusk Of
Maryland, Ryan of New York, Scher-
merhc =. OF New York, Sickles of New
York, Sperry of Connecticut, Stevens
of Massachusetts, Talbot of Maryland,
Warner of New York, Wolverton OF
Pennsylvania. The Republicans who
voted for the internal revenue bill
were: Bowers of California, Fletcher
of Minnesota, Hartman of Montana,
March of Illinois, Picker of South Da-
kota, Sweet of Idaho. White of Ohio.
With the exception of these votes and
those Of Mccall of Massachusetts,,
Powers of Vermont and Scranton of
Pennsylvania, who voted against the
the internal revenue amendment, the
Republicans refrained from voting on
this proposition.
The amendments in committee hay
ing all been agreed to in the House the
question was upon the engrossing and
third reading of the bill and it was
agreed to.
Covert (Dem.) of New York, offered
resolution Of recommlttal, and on
this demanded the previous question.
Covert demanded the yeas and nays,
but this demand was voted down
ayes 36, noes 227-not one-ffth second
ing the demand. The motion to recon-
nit was then defeated by vote of 1O3
to III, the announcement Of the vote
being greeted with loud applause.
The Speaker then put the question,
"Shall the bill pass?" and, The yeas and
nays being demanded on this, the roll
was called amid the most intense inter
est on the floor and in the galleries. AS
the names of the doubtful Democrats
we're reached, and they voted "aye' or
mo-" applause, cheers and sometimes
good-natured bantering following their
votes. The greatest applause followed
Cockran's vote of "aYe," and also Cum
mings's negative vote, and the atlirma-
tive vote Of Everett of Massachusetts,
Geissenhainer of New Jersey, Lock
wood Of New York, Magner, McAleer,
Tracy, Beltzhoover, Warner, Blanchard
and Boatner. And Republican applause
greeted the votes IN the negative of
Cam pbell, Covert, Cummings. Davey
of Louisiana, Geary Of California,
Haines OF New York, hendrix Of New
jersey, Price of Louisiana, Robertson of
Louisiana, Schermerhorn OF New \ ork,
Sihley of Pennsylvania, Sickles of New
York and Sperry of Connecticut. Woen
the names of Wilson and the Speaker
were called, great cheers greeted their
answers of "aye.''
The Populists all voted for the bill,
except Newlands of Nevada. The vote
was announced at $50 o'clock as fol-
lows: Yeas 203; nays lao; so the bill
was declared passed, with wild shout
from the floor and the galleries.
a later and more careful examination
of the vote showed that 204 had voted
for the bill, including the Speaker. The
announcement was greeted with cheer
ing and applause in the galleries and
on the floor, which continued until the
House adjourned.
The usual motion to reconsider and
to lay on the table were made by VIII
son and were carried, and the House
then, at 555, adjourned till tomorrow
at II o'clock.
The following is the detailed vote on
the MASSAGE of the bill