St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1894-01-25
DISTRICT COURT.

Treffie Tessier was yesterday acqult-
ted upon his trial tor larceny.
James CuwobeS has begun PERSONAL
injury action against the st. Paul City
Railway company.
The case of A. r. Clpehart against
George E. Foster is still pending in
Judge Egan's court.
j. A. Sidring pleaded guilty of burg
larry in the second degree and will be
sentenced on Friday.
Richard Price, an insolveat, has filed
schedules showing his assets TO be $751;,
9979Q, liabilities, S65,269.
Benjamin Clay, very black negro,
was tiled on The charge of stealing
secondhand goods from the pawn shop
OF Joseph Sansome.
Alexander Sternburg has begun an
action against William A. Dovern aud
William BanholZer to recover $50 due
on pr0miSSOry note.
Judges Kelly and Otis are still hear
ing evidence and law in the ejectment
case of the City of st. Paul against the
Chicago, Milwaukee IL st. Paul Railway
Company.
P. j. McGrath has sued the North
western COruage company to recover
$1,000 for hand injured in piece OF
alleged, was defective.
Caroline Martesen was injured. as
alleged, by the starting of an electric
car while getting off, and she asks judy
ment against the st. Paul City hallway
company tor 81, QUO damages.
Albert Frost has sued the st. Paul
City Railway company for $4,000 be-
cause OF broken collar bone and other
Injuries alleged to have been received
by the sudden starting of a car.
The Blossom Manufacturing company
has begun an action against Andrew
TwOmey and others to enforce a lien for
S63S.36 Oil account of materials fur
nished in the erection Of building.
Annie Kuther. by her guardian ad
Item. Ferdinand Kuther, has sued
William Arndt to recover $1,000 dam
ages alleged to have been sustained
Dec. 5 last by the bite of vicious dog.
The Provident Life Trust company,of
Philadelphia, yesterday instituted a
suit in the district court against Eliza
beth ID. Spicer to quiet the title to por-
ton OF lot II, blocks, DaytOn'S addition.
John F. Buechner yesterday began
suit i'll the district court against the
Columbian Shoe company to recover
$1,000 for alleged injuries to the hand of
plaintiffs son, Eddie, who, as stated,
was hurt in a machine of the defendant.
Eva NJ. Baldwin asks for a divorce
from Charles e. Baldwin, alleging will
full deSertiOn for more than three years.
They were married at Litchfield Oct. 6,
1851. She is thlrty-one and he thirty
two years old. He deserted his wife i'll
1855.
Simon D. Paddock has begun an
action against William C. Bennett and
May NJ. Bennett to reform deed for
eighty acres of land so as to provide
that the plaintiff shall not assume three
mortgages for S23, 751.34. The purchase
price of the land was $4,000
Jacob f. FranZen, as assignee of the
ST. Paul German Insurance company,
began an action in the district court
against n. Whitford and Camille Bison
to recover S29S.9S, premiums alleged to
have been collected by Whitford and
retained while he was agent of the COM
pany at Henderson.
Robert Ross has sued the Great North
ern Railway company to recover S496.50
for excessive time served as an engineer
III charge OF steam shovel Oh the line
from GLASGOW. Mont, to the Pacific
coast in 1892 and 1893. Frank johnson
has sued the same company for 1892 for
overtime as assistant engineer.
James S. Rockford asks judgmen
against the Great Northern Railway
company for $4,000 damages to his prop
erty on Park avenue by reason of the
alleged fact that the railroad INSTRUCTED
the street in front of his store by freight
trains so that his business was de-
stroyed, and the value of his real estate
deprecated.
William c. Kreuger was awarded
verdict Of $3.50 against the st. Paul City
Railway company yesterday. He was
arrested on charge of assaulting
conductor, but the case was dismissed.
The suit for damages was brought on
the theory that the street railway
company caused the arrest without
ground therefor.
Judge Kerr and jury are engaged In
trying the action brought by the Earl
Fruit company against the Thurston
Cold Storage and Warehouse company.
The object OF the suit is to recover 81, 1877
claimed to be due on apples sold. The
defense is that the apples were received
OH commission and that only the price
realized less commissions was to be ac-
counted for instead of a fixed price.