The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1894-07-08

IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN
Utah Utah, Territory; County. of Salt Lake
Groespeck and his wife, Ann D. Groes-
beck, Max Martin and Samuel L. Lipser,
partners doing business as Martin & Lip
Charles L. Baxter, Thomas Borlase,
Mary Brixen, William T. Sampson, the
Gilbert Manufacturing Company, cor
New York, Sally 1. Mayer, Abraham
Strouse and Max Adler, partners doing
business as Mayer. Strouse & Company.
Hays, John s. Scott, and James Ander-
son, partners doing business as Scott &
Anderson, The First National Bank of
G. Brixen,. ]. Bourgard, The First Ma
tional Bank of Deadwood, South Dakota,
corporation, The National Bank of the
poration, and William Groesbeck, Frank
T. Hiatt, Robert r. Burton, Sen, A 3.
Ballard, defendants. Alias Summons.
The People of the Territory of Utah send
wife, Ann D. Groesbeck, Max Martin and
Samuel L. Lipser, partners doing business
as Martin & Lipser, Henry w. Green and
H. NJ. Bacon, Charles L. Baxter, Thomas
Borlase, Mary BrlXen, William T. Samp-
son, The Gilbert Manufacturing Com
pany, corporation under the laws of the
Abraham Strouse, and Max Adler, part
ners doing business as Mayer, Strouse &
Company Neil 1 Stills T EFF Ellis sd Browne
Anderson, partners doing business as
Scott & Anderson, The First National
Bank of Park City, Utah, corpora ton,
National Bank of Deadwood, South Da-
kota, corporation, The National Bank Of
the Republic, of Salt Lake City, Utah. a
Frank T. Hiatt, Robert T. Burton, Sen,
A. B. Ballard, Defendants. You are here
by required. to appear in an acton
brought against you by the above named
plaintiff in the District Court of the Third
Judicial District of the Territory of Utah,
and to answer the complaint filed therein
within ten days exclusive of the day of
summons-if served within this county;
or, if served out of this county, but In
this district, within twenty GAYS; othe l,,
default will be taken against you, accord
ing to the prayer of said complaint. The
said action is brought to nave judgment
against defendants John A. and VIM.
Groesbeck in sum of $4,000. with in
terest from July 20, 1893, alleged to be due
on a certain promissory note, executed by
said defendants to plaintiff, May ., Rs0,
for $685. 5O0 with interest from date at SAC
per annum, same being due and wholly
unpaid, save interest to July 20 1888, and
being secured by a mortgage Of even date
on premises hereinafter described, for
further sums of 1893, and interest at lOI2
per annum from Oct. 80, 1898, 500. ", and
l 1O INTEREST nferest from from Nov. 20 1888 s and
1O% interest from Dec. 10. 1893, sa65, and
interest from Dec. 10, 1888 and $f7I8, ana
interest from Jan. IS. 1894. for taxes paid
bv plaintiff upon said premises at SAID
dates: to have the usual decree or this
court for foreclosure of said mortgage
and sale of said premises, that proceeds
of such sale be applied In payment OF &C,
counts due as above with costs and 10
attorneys fee; that plaintiff have judgs5
ment against defendants John A. and
VIM. C.roesbeck for any deficiency ana for
other relief; said premises are described
as follows. to-wlt: Commencing at north
west corner of lot 2, block 81, plat A.
Salt Lake City survey, running thence
south As feet; thence east 1l9& feeti
| thence north As feet; thence west 11e%
feet to place of beginning, situate in Salt
Lake City and County, Utah; And you are
hereby notified that if you fail to appear
and answer the complaint as above re-
quired, the said plaintiff will apply to thu
court for the relief demanded therein:
witness, the HON. SAMUEL Az
MERRITT, Judge, and the Seal OF
the District Court of the Third Ju-
tISeal.1 dicial District, in and for the Ter
ritory of Utah, this 10th day or
April in the year of our Lord One
! Thousand Eight Hundred and Nine
DAVID C. DUNBAR, Clerk.
BY. GEO. D. LOOMS. Deputy Clerk
J. H. Hurd, attorney for4platntin.