The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1894-02-03
HEARD N COURT TODAY.
The Usual Saturday Motions
Entertained.
BROWN, sTfEse & CLARK CASE.
Fourteen Days Allowed by the Court
I'm Which 10 Enter Interrogatories.
The Docket for Monday, February
5-Other Court News.

The calendar OF motions was heard
usual today in both divisions of the SUI
preme Court.
In the case of Gilbert III. Shepard VS..
William III. Washburn surety was ordered
on or before February 10.
This case of B. Feifer a Co. VS.. Louis
Michael will be reassigned.
Hardt Won Bermuth a Co. VS.. X. l..
Clothing Co. was continued one week.
The case OF James A. King VS.. ID. b..
Cruickshank was assigned to March /.
The case of jacob JacoboWich VS.. Aaron
Wightman ct nx was passed.
The case of John III. Drpry VS.. james
Baker was passed.
The case OF Henry A. Kirby VS.. Anchor
Pearl Co. was assigned TO Feb. 16.
In the case of George L. Tucker xs-- M.
j. Crocker a motion was made to dismiss
the appeal on the ground that no proper
appeal bond had been fled, The appeal,
the defense stated does not name any APP
peiate court whatever. Mr.. Iittlefeld for
the plaintiff thought that mistake
had been made In the copy OF the bond
which he had with him. The case was as :
signed to hearing next Saturday.
In the case OF Joseph Myette VS.. j. M.
Gross, an action for negligence, a motion
has been filed that the defendant give
surety for plaintiffs costs. The motion
wag denied and the case assigned to
March 8.
Appellate Division.
The case of Daniel A. Wright ct ux., ct
al. VS.. Patrick Prior ct al was continued
to Feb. IL.
The case of Patrick Grady VS.. John f.
Sullivan was continued to Feb. IL.
The case OF Anthony Fenley VS.. William
N. Cassidy, asking that certain sale of
land he restrained, was heard, and the in
junction granted.
The case of the State VS.. Peter Habib
will be heard March 2.
The case of A. o. Thurston q Son VS..
Dewey +. Adams was continued one week.
Mrs. Agan's Hardships.
Catharine Agan asked tho court that an
injunction be issued restraining her son
from transferring certain prop
erty belonging TO her. She stated
in her deposition that she had given her
son ", 700 to buy for her a'house, but he
had purchased the place in his own name
and refused to turn it over. to her. She
told narrowing story Of cruelty at the
hands of her son and his wife.
The case OF Charles r. Thurber ct ux vs.
Edwin II. Carpenter was continued
The case Of Marietta Wakefield VS.. At
bert II. Wakefield was continued to Feb
ruary 13.
The Springfield Bonds.
"A motlon was TO nave been heard today
in regard to answers to the bill in the
Springfield bond case, but il was post
poned until Monday at p m. @
Given Two Weeks.
Another hearing was. given today on
the famous Brown, Steese and Shsrpcase.
Fifteen inteTogatories have been filed
and the Boston attorneys wanted three
weeks in which to answer them. Thecourt
held that fourteen days is ample, and
allowed them that much time,
Docket for Feb.5.
appellate Divsion.l
Vncontested divorce docket.
~ Common Pleas Division
DDS. Ezra Humes VS.. Fred II. Jencks ct
al. Attorneys Page a. Owen for plain
tiff, j. L. jerks for defendant.
1899. McHale & Thompson VS.. William
Il. kenney. Attorneys n. r. Murphy for
the plaintiff, ii. j. Carroll for defendant