Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1894-03-19

thor not being given an Opportunity
90 revise %, tor the palraulu reason
that % h8 had been hs no doubt would
have endcavoro % prevent The pub.
LEGATION. lfthIs Is robbery, the uoli'
ross OF the ioeI will bs sull more no
ticgaDlc Do the New York Word which
has published ut o distances oi 5000
miles each lecture thus fsr delivered
rhr m1rning following DE delivery.
AZ tbe opening Of the second lecture
tx.praIgn, came out with @ pre-.
.uIo which showed that Doe was far
from being p.oaIeI with scei1g his TO-.
MARKS iu print Spanking % what hal
appeared iu the San fnlciIe3 paper hc
sniI. "-usl publications, mob r5v.aoi
uy tho author are euro 90 be il'l Of
mIs,,tct that are mofi'yiuz TO the
lecturer auI misleading 90 ,h0s8 whj
read theme" us also remais,Ii "5 me
of QUE newspaper rcnIs have greatly
exercised tlamliive4 over lIs qIos.
'i1u, 'Wh1' shall We I1 with o1r OK.
ricuIcutg IHaqIoa.iol lust haa
never troubled me macl, snI / have
never iglt called upon before 10 offer q
ISOLATION, 1ul fra ylog OF my experience
yesterday, venture 90 olag this sIlu.
H11, which wall bs pef.or. 80 lsf as
ana C1uce.ncli DO not Steal what be-.
longs o. Them. That Will answor all
tho requirements in nay CASE" he
aIlC4i 'l have not ush nn estimation
ai il,sc lectures myaCli na o. think that
grand larceny could be- preIigatci on
tho stealing OF thom, Uu. suoh property
as there IAN them BE- ui1e"
Zoe tlo sake of arsIm5nt, it may
Us admitted that tho no, Of the
Iapuu Ia publishing tue lecture was a
piece OF marSsi da1Iur,ssy 10 tho
lecturer, BnI that &c ml lht b8 UNJUST.
Hlul1 except under extraordinary cir
clms.auos, which Il not appear to
oxis. in this case. 81. whun tho eE
President experienced lawyer and
polit elan though nc b,, alleges bic
title ~ individual ownership OF utter.
auces made 90 thl s.IIguts OF public
Institution, hO sets upa ratncs remark.
able claim, aud QUE thai will not DO
lrga,oI ~ OF my Virtue iu this oouu.
try. "5uch properly o. Is in them"
may have been the iotuseFi before
no sp9kti but WHOM he gave hil views
out 10 the students slI invite ru stl,
among whom was tno s,cu3graphcf,
They became tho property Of tine listen.
crs iof any lawful use.
Tue rulo laid dosn by Mr. Hlfr.lon
rs o. exclusive owuuunlp OF gEprol.
stIns made by IA iniris.1rin school
would boa worry inuscr5ul on1 Ia this
co iutry. Ho s,ys that an unruvlsoI
re-. OF, OF tnom Is "ms,uadlng" 90
the roaiersi ye, tue ar, OF atonlguphy
has rsacle such perfection 20 practice
that the chances arc ten o. one tho
report was verbatim. if % D. mlsleai.
los 70 the reAdup, were not tlc same
words equally ~ whom spoken to tle
northumberland ifthey lull arc Mt
harglsou's private properly, might mol
ono who chose 10 disseminate ln Ga,
school auarchis;io or trcasouab'c doc
ifinoa lay The some claim AMI demand
Ihc same protection ia tue ownership
When cxptcssi3ns, whether proper
misleading Or worso, aiu made Ia the
hearing OF others, they arc no longui
the property Of the speaker exclusively,
but having been given to the Winds q.
It were, may be- lawfully dealt with by
others. Tue sau Francisco paper.
aud the New Yorh W0r'd's publication
1f tho lecture may look ike discour,osy
70 the ex.prcsiiont, bu, certainly thor,
was no stealing o. anything from him
Ho had given Il away before the news
paper g0l IT,