Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1894-06-16

Harris Maetsrton the compisinnnrr ca>-
" but little b1ttet founlei. The ttit
denre wholly tails 90 support thu ehates$
hini II " nat ltfue that llnilH Alkttofs
ron aided nnt esslrtel lofnslnu phNi.
VNn iania dcsrfihs'i N mo bili. or fhat
, hf ttrfteuntod 70 complainant that inii
lena wnh gisAt q ynSumhAnces ckqlpt
the sun, ui tfM or tint he made my
agreement With thc complainant ~ 10
ile prymen; et saw ~ pssr said llnr
nhOuli hy uinutcds Or ihDt be fNprrapntlh
that the thid is0i wRs thd only snoanl.
| btnngc WIEN nanl pfuptllN
induecd sht complainant % employ ar,
rhle Y, AlN-tctf1h Zoe nny lipfrurr what
e.fr h nal o teOt that Inv ro,nuiRlis.
| nv reNtNl urou ANY Representations ~
harris Meeltghon nor isit o faHi unler
/ We vNideutr NJ thn u1s4 thai litffia
| Matisfsei lnvw AnNhne about The ~.
! Y had ANYTHING whaiescf 70 DO VITA
rho eonlcnileh ~ The complainant Ia
/ the purpose II the epfiilainant 10 40
/ Vutt q pfiVr llch upon the property. tet
| oelysl she ninenn, OF hia vendors nsn.
also heli q truht devd u ferdri bur.
| lne uiiun the said ianu Witch Wpnld
mortgage ana that hy hls piisncr vita
/ ttkat W the existence Of the trust
tcvfi. nnNer ihe clNumntsncse nienl
aa.oiinN that trisi deed IA iavot "
tbN complainant This yiuN OF tht casa
"a strohsD sapparlsd ~ tho nnihdtiue9
on INV other hand. ii h commended that
4 llprrH NaAiefaun had ruOa reason ~
believe that iltnwh nrns,, who hr sup.
/ sdSlsed n ,h Ne ssls,eness ', y ihc NV, t
uNrd, ns shown NY the tocDrdA, because
hr had every rehacn 10 suppose that,
90 aeneral prtctioe n rnrafll money
irnlttA ~ deAinn with land, they hul
prov'asi 'hsnlselNs, n The matter Of
and certificate usual IA snrh cnara,
Mhig1h, Aestsagl AM Certificate Would
my ,sangwn Xxx n ,'hg s,a i, 9, tastsi
connected wlti, the loan. aud only APP
pleA 20 With refetenco 70 tho payment
* y, st9sae,s llsn Nss ~ Ssilga upaa
iNr fiyhi f. SUPPOSE was already IN
tirr ,oNeasion, 'rhefe are some nli.
jnined cases suppotilun ,hia siew of the
~ tho whnin ease was vYoapntsi Ia
the rcutl below aga even ~ this court.
| M merit. ei INV cSn,sn,lsns "Wf INK
was ease In which the complainant
hNd come into nontl With a fair nrrsentl
lion 70 asrsri VA equities wiihSuif n,
Jury TO Others, and hnA presented me
matter u ratoppi upun the real facts
I
vllnel W the oplniun that he would not
have been turned out 81 court without
consideration ~ lila ilglit 10 assert The
entnnpci IN question AlVh case. how.
ever 70 not the one IA hand, hut rather
ease whfrn M, complainant, by ria
uhRrgru pt fraud anl cohqnlrncy 20
cheat, nNlndlt and deffaun. nnainet
iitfis AlAAleeon and other parties
purninH lhvir personal and pfufeaaionel
integrity. and Following The same Nc
| with fupAifaH evidence IN support thote.
of which tho lliRhtrnt ihyOstirRtlcn
wnuh have rh0wn him 10 he whally
untaundod preaenia hinreif a. on, mora
ineilnrh 10 asa equity than 10 40 equity.
and one not ~ court Win nfh clean
hands ~ entitled HIM in demand Of thu
count 10 consider faNornhlN u him ihe
partial rnuity snnHrltrd, even n II we're
uthefWlsa VOL founded
Certainly, 90 The ease VITA there ps--
npntrh, tho hoprrH ui tho circuit court
diemlhring IN complainant on ~ riiirf
WAS pforttN owen Nhi even DO lilr
eAse "a presented hNtg, wc 500 no ruf-
iioleut reason No nriuth the same.