New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1894-03-27
HER MANY ENGAGEMENTS.
, MOTHER MAN WHOM MISS POLLARD WAS
GOING TO MARRY.
HE WAS 4 LEXINGTON CARPENTER rrT SHE
FLEW INTO \ RAGE BECAUSE HE WOULD
NOT TAKE HER TO E''RorE-IiER
mock MARRIAGE WITH JULIAN
JUDGE ERADLEvs De
r51CN

il0l'N.
Washington. March 2i-Tho trial Of the Pollard
prec,,inridee case dragged YEARLY to-day IL was i
1ov Of dispositions mostly intended TO estanlsn an
oIh on behalf Of the defendant as to certain cafes
testified to Ivy the plaintiff
I'nIntercsting as the dcpos,tions were Ms '"''
there was one new point brought out anu ''''' "
that Miss Pollard had been engaged 10 ahot"'' "'
not previously mentioned In the case. '"',
tba third engagement contracted by her that mas
,oo, hrougbt 70 light excepting the alleged one
,,,,h coIonel Brockinrlgc: and Miss Pollards PAL
,ialitv to elderly men when she was young h"'
was shown in the testimony OF TINS ne" ma" ~
tho case who was forty-wo years Ola NJ ''e '''','
the engagement contracted. Another !" -,
,,or rcad was that Of Aleck Julian. Miss Pollard
"Rlind Rarnabas" in reference TO the mo'h "'" MAJ,
rage between Miss Pollard and himself III ,
Thos. I'm the courtroom who looked for seii9at'oi'
olisrn in this deposition were difappohi'u' an" -"
the whole with the qualifying remarks 90 '"',''
in cross-examiration IT was not very ""'"'
to the pla ntiH. -, ia,
The time when Colonel breckenridge VIII 'Ah' W.
stand Il h. doe. At all app ars sun fo''"'', ~
remote lie is not likely 20 nc called To- t's''S J"
| his own behalf before Wednesday afternoon.
Governor Matthews. of indiana ana ms S'""
and members Of the Princeton ins ho' team" WI
interested listeners at tho trial To-Day.
Judge Bradley gave his decision rAhns o"' '', ''"
depositions and saying others ought t" nave ".'"
,,,loJ o,t hacaiis. they were 500 hthy lie "pi'N u
20 the press TO omit the objectionable p1ss'h'.'
The first deposition t'"" ''' ' =, - ,ho
Railev Of Versailles. Ky, who is ci'Ih % Wv
| ,rn1for1 c,u,.,v Court who produced his records
"Oo"'''" , :, ,,..i,l,,rilge had been an
TO show that w G. J. hI,'N'''' JUS .,-,. ,r,oi
| attorney for L. u. and . T. Brown h 'i''' ''.
-. ,,,,r,.r f., Ianuary ISL on January g. ISL
Tor ""iN'' ~ ''"' -. ., .,,,, grcorling 10
Colonel BrcckinridHc was D" wv - 49, 49,, m.
the records and was also there ApTu ~ i>'' '"'
-, ,,.a ,t,, tb. brown case was UP In couri
''''' INV 49,, . 49, ,t,,, whom Miss Pollard
on August o. ISL ~ IN, ''. 'ilr.. had mot her at
testified that oio"'' 10, ttrefon. "A lew DAY "a
the mouse OF o., - ''
after thc hI't'u n,,nii H. Intended TO show the
Other 1"posiuoha ''"N VIZ
same thing ,. ..,i..,, ,,.a.. read next
Sister Marie hr1chin n' ''l'''" " l,,., 30 Z.
She is seventy you: N'''. ot ',. <..r. Dam,
1886 had been 'ni"il-' W r.r@ Mis-. pollard
Convent at HcAi.i,,t ,t.r ,,,s nothing important
| went 10 scho'l In l'N'. 80, ,..l.r Arn.s IA.
| IN this d.p"siil'h I'. d" '... nom. c,nIeut Al
Mother superior '' ''' -'
| Reading ,,...,.. =. t,-..t , -trteut.r Of
The deposition "l N''ii'i ~ %. =. .,. ~ IN.
| Lexington, was irti nos" ''i' 49,. '',,hf.,t ..
! dcpOsIfiOus admitted tp-Iil UT ~ ~. gu u,,t
specific Objection. He nal mo- VI "a, az. '''
he said ut the house o. @lis iNrIl. - NJ. ID
near Lexington about May lh'-' anu a. - .,l
lards invitation Do" chllrI 'N"'l, e. i.if.'l M,
within a couple - ~ lutn@ h- ana "i'.' ''''
came engaged 10 be n trrI. s"1 Wh, ~ nm,