The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1894-02-09
HEARD IN COURT TODAY.
One Divorce Case in Appellate
Division.
A Husband Who Has Been Absent
for Fourteen Years-Court Notes
Docket for Feb. 10.

.Myra II. Eaton, in petition for divorce
before Judge Tilling hast, alleges that she
has been deserted by her husband for Ia
years and during that time has been COM
PEELED TO rely solely upon her own exertions
to support herself and daughter. Her
husbands name is John III. Eaton and he
Is engaged in the lightning rod business.
In the last II years he con-
tributed toward the support OF
his child one pair of shoes, one dollar in
money and one photograph album. 1t is
said that he earns comfortable subsis-
tence.
The case of Winsor a. Co., VS.. Waldron
was contnuedtoday before Judge Wilbur.
The case of Hernchutz VS.. Prudential
was called today before Judge Rogers and
the plaintiff not appearing he was non
suited.
Docket for Feb. 10.
Appellate Divisionl
$500. Thomas j. Hanley eft ux. VS.. Com
fort II. Thomson ct al. Attorney. r..
Lester for complainant.
9614. Nettie Medbury VS.. Charles Med
bury. Attorneys-Page q Owen for pc
titioner.
1862. Maria Grimes VS.. Rosay Grimes.
| Attorneys--G. j. West for petitioner, Cor
man a. Egan. p. j. Quinn for respondent.
| 1905. A. o. Thurston q Son VS.. Dewey
| 4. Adams. Attorneys-Page a Owens for
complainant, q. j. West for respondent.
| 95SS. AddielIne CHASER VS.. Samuel
| Glaser. Attorneys-D. w. Fink for COM
plainant, }. M. Brennan for respondent.
3172. Chas. II. Thurber ct ux. VS.. Edwin
f. Carpenter. Attorneys. Osfield and
\ III. j. Dubois for complainant j. l.. Jencks
and Il. w. Robinson for respondent.
1927. Michael Bowler ct ux. VS.. James
III. McCusker ct al. Attorneys-W. w. a
r. w. Blodgett for complainant. q. j.
West for respondent.
1902. Peter Donnelly vs.. Michael Sim
mons. Attorneys e. j. West for COM
plainant, w. b. Vincent for respondent.
1862. Arthur Cusson VS.. Ludger Gem
me ct ux. Attorneys. +. Goldsworthy
| for complainant.
1916. Daniel A Wright ct ux. VS.. Joseph
Hcaly. Attorneys. w. Hogan and S. s.
Lapham for complainants, A. p. Sumner
and l.. M. Cooke for respondent.
3i3S. Charlotte X. Dodge VS.. John w
Hogan ct al. Attorneys-A. X. Greene for
complainant, J. w. Hogan, w. III. Greene
and p. j. Mccarthy for respondent.
1860. Lille N. +. Skinner VS.. Samuel
M. Skinner. Attorneys-W. ii. Greene fol
complainant.
1854. Charles. j. McCready ct ux VS.
William NJ. Bruner ct ux. ct al. Attor-
neys-James Tillinghast for complainant
$500. Almy Water Tube Boiler Co. VS.
City of Providence. Attorneys. G. Ely
and o. l.. Bosworth for complainant
| CITY Solicitor for defendant.
| common Pleas Division.l
677. Frank A. Raia admr. vs.. Builders
Iron Foundry. Attorneys Wood and
Fitch for plaintiff, Samuel Ames for
| defendant.
730. Geo. L. Tucker, app. VS.. w. l.
| Crocker, admr. Attorneys, Littletield q
stiness for plaintiff, |. Champlin for
defendant.
67s. Hardt Won Bermuth VS.. Rhode
Island Clothing Manufacturing Company
| j. j. Hahn for defendant.
653. B. Feifer & Co. VS.. Louis Michele
| ttorneys-Bassett & Mitchell for plain
| tiff, j. j. Hahn for defendent.
| 669. Universal Fashion Co. vs.. Berry
Bros. Attorneys-C. Il. Champlin for
plaintiff, III. M. Kimball for defendant.
ia. Gilbert II. Shepard vs.. VIM. II
| Washburn ct al. Attorneys C. M. Sails
| bury for plaintiff; III. Almy and j. G. Ely
| for defendant.
7o9o McHale q Thomson vs.. VIM. f
| Kenney. Attorneys r. Murphy fol
plaintiff; III. j. Carroll for defendant.
6601. Charles +. Brown ct ux. VS.. Will
| liam G.. Smith admrs. Attorneys-Page 4
Owen for plaintiff, b. Nj. Bosworth for
defendant.
676. Bronia Lipschutz VS.. Henry Rosen-
blatt. Attorneys-F. III. Wildes fol
plaintiff, }. J. Hahn for defendant.
6S79. A. Lockwood Danielson ct ux. Va
Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway
Co. Kttorneys-w l.. Hodgman fol
plaintiff, f. $. Arnold for defendant.
3S1. Assigned, Catherine Dolan tr. VS..
| James Dolan. Attorneys-C. III. johnson
| for plaintiff, y. j. Mccarthy for defendant.