The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1894-01-05
FROM PARKHURST AND MUSS.
THEY DON'T CAFE NIcoLL AND THB
SPECIAL GRAND JURORS RAsCALa

That Il, They Doo't Say ~ In So Many
Words. and They "Don't Exactly Meas
to I.sinuate" - Mr.. NIson Has Few
Cont.-pt-ous Word. 20 ser II Reply.
got out another statement It ls about their
failure to get Police Inspector Williams and
Captains Schmittberger and Haughey indict-
cd. 1t opens with the old charges Of delays
oontrived by District Attorney NicOlL Here IL
q sample Of mot exactly meaning TO insinu-
ats"i
our eases against Cart Hsushsy were absolutely
spoiled he curously, having raided the Identical four
houses lin Greene and Wooster Streets which
our specifications in Mr.. Nlcoils hands. - We do
not exactly mean to insnuate that Niooli gave the
eases away. and pshap. sueh . thought would not
have occurred to had It not been that he did subse
ousntly give the schmitbsrasr case swayOr 1t Ia
reported By the public journAls
Mr.. Moss falls foul OF Richard J. Cross who
was foreman Of the August Grand Jury which
did not hear the cases. and foreman Of the
extraordinary Grand Jury in December which
failed to indlct Williams and schmittberger
MIR. Cross Is q m ember Of the firm Of Morton.
Bliss Il Co. Mr.. Moss, or DR.. Parkhurst-
whichever we" means--says that he had to
bulldoze Mr.. Nlcoll into submitting the cases
In December at ALL and that then they went
before the extraordinary Grand Jury. although
the regular Grand Jury "as we had good
reason to know" wanted to hear the cases.
while we were convinced that the chances Of
an indictment By the eItEaordinary Grand
In so many words that he had good reason to
know that the regular Grand Jury would In
"A conferences and an understanding boz
tween the District Attorney and the accused
IL one Of the thlngs we" infer from certain
The eases were Legally perfect Hs declare.
that after hearing inspecto! Williams and
", without submitting their Testimony to any
q that seaIchinz Investigation that Judge
had sesn
report. the proprle5ors q sohmittberSer,,s Dis:
iis liar nesisos ' Xitsr this 's ssS WI"
st: 1S iRRp'1s az jaw taT'i S sS n:
~ 8 y: ?s:;
BY on. who Ss. been for avs months sighting asaiss;
having the matter brought before the Grand Jury ana
~ s.s:i. sSaai,ioS sEsn:t which y. proposed "a:
Asornsys once held BY on. who's. Judicial sense !:
Loyalty his friends doe. not interfere with bis
SEdinpas,si das. ' 70 AL GLASSES 'N'H 'naspsna'h'
th. Wan hsys served 1t. pu,po.. If I. shah
The stress Of wind and tids against which have to
make head. and the imposSibity Of securing in this
city thing than the cArtcature of justice Till
At the polls some Of the joints and hgAments have
been broken that kpt our municipal Gov Srnment into
compact body OF brigAndAge aud defiance.
The statement Is not signed.
De IIancey Nicoll road DR.. Parkhursts state
ment last night; he spoke OF it as tissue OF
said. that DR.. Farkhurst has been misled 10y
his associate, lawyer OF small capacity and
less repute. into forming conclusions which
he could never have reached otherwise.
His statement Is a covert attack on tho
special Grand Jury and . direct one on me.
/ do not think that body OF estimable eiti-
zans nseds any defence from me-. I will
not 90 over the answer which I made
some days ago to, the. criticisms which
he has rehashed in his last statement.
do not now recall that there was any case
against Capt. Haughey suggested to me. all
though il may have been but l certainly never
exam D ed the papers In any such case. and his
insinuntion as to misconduct in that regard
do not propose even to dignity with a reply"
Mr.. Nicoll said the cases were fully presented
to the Grand Jury. and that in view OF DR..
larkhurst's previous criticisms, lie did not
even advise that body "a to their action, but
requested Thorn to consult Justice Barrett. and
tn, was done.
shall you bring suit against DR.. Parkhurst
for his statements - was asked.
should as soon think OF suing lunAtic."
he answered