Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1894-02-08
The Higher Courts,
CIVIL COURT or APPEALS,


The following opinions We're handed
down IN the court of civil appeals this
j. i. s. Cant ct al vs.. w. NJ. Cole
man. Appeal from Archer county AZ
iirmed.
Wichita Valley Railway Company VS..
Thomas Shea Appeal from Wichita
county. Reversed and rcmandcd
u. G. and NJ l.. Roby vs.. O. l..
Carter, Appeal from Nolan. Reversed and
Il. ii. 1ooncy vs.. j. Il, Simpson ct
al. Appeal from Parker. Reversed and
remanded
sham. Appeal from Clay. Affirmed.
Texas aud Pacific Railway Company vs..
II NJ. Spal1ing ct al. Appeal from
Denton. Affirmed.
Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fc Railway
Company VS.. j., Il; nerrill. Appeal
from Denton. Affirmed,
II. NJ Powell VS. r. A . ltcckcrman.
Appeal from Mitchell. Reversed and re-
minded,
Fort Worth aud Denver City Railway
Wise, Affirmed.
Western Union Telegraph Company vs..
R0rru Proctor. Appeal from Denton.
Reversed and reminded.
S. j. TUmpkns ct al VS.. Y b. VIII
liams ct al Appeal from Denton. Re
Western Union telegraph Company vs.,
r.. II. Zane. Appeal from Midland,
Affirmed.
", NJ, Andrews VS.. Fort Worth aud
Denver City Railway Company. Appeal
from Hartley Affirmed.
Fort Worth and Denver City Railway
Company vs., j NJ. ChenOweth ct al.
Appeal from Wise. Affirmed.
j. u, Parks Vi, r., H. Bates. Ap-
peal from Wise. Affirmed.
Tho following motions were this day
j. N. Slude vs.. w. l.. Patton ct al.
Motion for rcheurng,
j ID. Milman VS.. Edward Hart.
Motion for rehearing.
state of Texas. cN-rel., NJ. G. Cottrell
vs.. 10; A. McCliskey. Motion to file
ST, Louis Cattle Company vs.. s. S.
Gohlson. Motion TO nmend transcript,
j, y. TOmlnaon VS.. j, q, Logue.
Motion for rehcaring.
o. Il. Hester vs.. John Nelson, Mo
ton TO affirm on certificate.
II. II. Block vs.. IL. A. rcllctt. Mo
tlQn TO strike out appellants motion for
rehearing,
j a Frey ct al vs., Fort Worth and
Rio Gmndc Railway Company. Motion
for rehearing
Emerson Nlcott Il Co. VS.. L. #.
| Williams ct al. Motion to advance ON
docket.
Casey & swasey VS.. G. y. Douglas
81 al. Motion TO strike out appelleos
Missouri Kansas and Texas Railway
/ Company W., l., NJ. Scriyenor. Motion
/ 20 ne record by agreement.
! The following motions were this day
decided.
N. s. Walton W. w. Il. waggoncr
70 lle conclusions Of law and fact. Re
G w Word VS.. Shawnee Lodge. l.
O. @. II. To affirm on certificate, Re.
". II. worsham VS.. John verpal.
For rehearmg Refused.
| Il. n. james ct al VS., II. w. Great
house. To file record. Granted.
lAmeour y Watson VS.. Comanche
county. To lille transcript. Granted.
HaNier smith, Ir,, VS. W. l.. Vickers
" ~ 70 file record, Granted
al, feter You're vs.. y Q. League. To
] Gulf Colorado and Santa Fe Railway
I Company vs.; Jerry CNgln. For rehear-
Rosa Rallcster VS.. Manu- & Stephens
ct al. For rehearing, Refused.
| y. w. CASTS vs.. j. V, Roberts
n. {. Walton lows vs.. $. n gnrus,, ., a,
To have conclusion of law aud fact ilei
/ Refused.
Lone Star Elevator Company W. II
1 NJ, English. No file record Granted
state National Bank OF Vernon 81
| NaNabachic National Bank. no ile
l tfluscripi, Granted
Fort Worth aud Denver City Railway
I Company VS., Charles Goldberr 81 Al
~ file transcript Granted.
Merchants National Rank ~ Hart
I Worth vs.. II. n. MrAnulty ct MI IA
file record Granted