Macon beacon. [volume] (Macon, Miss.) 1859-1995, 1894-07-28
MoNoPoLIsTlo
Hew the Mckinley Doctrine IL Preached
by Pampered PandererH.

Hsw the Mckinley Doctrine Ia Preach
by PamPered PAnderers.
No rogue e'sr felt the halter dra
with good opinion of the law or II
district attorney. and the Manehest,
Mirror and Farmer, chief protectie
bunco steerer for the state Of Ne
Hampshire, protests most earnestl
against my kicking its large prote,
ton paunche. In reply to my indie,
ment, 1t sssures the republican voter
whom 1t is misleading and befoolini
on this question:
l. That am a hired writer for IN,
sugar trust, paid by 1t to defend il,
thetts.
q That there is now no tax on su
gar; that the Mckinley bill put suga,
on the free list, and that the wicked
democrats are now trying to put a Ia
on sugar that will benefit the ,rnst by
s.. 50 per ton.
J. q there mover was n sugar trust
undsr republican legislation. or while
the republicans taxed sugar, and that
II is under the law putting sugar on
the free list, under the abominable
free trade" in sugar of the Mckinley
bill, that the sugar trnst has grown
rich and insolent.
T. That every mar iexcept onel +,
he sugar trust is a democrat and that
vi the contributions of the uga trust
been made to the democratic
'arty.
There are many more statements Of
his kind with which 1t proposes to
oodwink the ignorant and y~icious re-
noilean voters of New Hampshire
20 ignorant to refer to the law and
e for themselves what the facts are.
10 vicious TO even care what the facts
re when the truth has been shown
Each republican vote which
lis protection bunco-steerer can re-
in for the republican party next No
'moer is worth $40 In crisp green.
to the league of four hundred
ID nifty American protected trusts. (
d IT blufing will keep even one vote
I'M straying' it does not propose to =
'e mat one. or Its percentage on any. :
II can steer into the game for its !
iployers 10 swindle. That 1t is Grim.
My dishonest, that it is a partner Of d
protection thieves, sharing their .
must be the unbiased opinion "
any honest man who reads its an. n
sr 70 my straightforward statement N
facts and figures, not one of which
ttempts to inpeach. il
MS World htreling OF the gang Ina. h., Il
.heu and Is about to execute this STU n
'o"s ROBBERY calls the pending bill one 70 l
'e 'He prohts OF the trust three-fourth. 49,
'o!> ne proposes to plant his well-shod III
stuare IN the stomach OF all who opnose pl
iHe "eii-shod heels OF that animal ara NJ
ieeis OF an ass that's staggering under ,bo J..
NE pru'a! owners have piled upon him y,
nose voice is badly broken by the hr,v- IN
"hlch o cruel keeper EFFORTS from him lie
vac soad. But listen further to the noise by
comes ~echoing from among the bats ,h,, :"
ns stomach up through the vacuum IN r'
Au'! ana out through the orifces Of h,s Ii
' VI h'S ~
al is its only answer to my state. pr
. that the Mckinley bill ..pro. az
the sugar trust with a duty of pc
y per ton; that the proposed sen. an
oiil reduces this Mckinley protec- Lo
OF the trust to n duty of so. so ner
1T cannot deny that the sugar ne
yearly receives under the Me- WI
syIaw So ooo' 600 blood money and
mail, 1t cannot deny that the ]
e bill substitutes a tax Of ona- the
n OF a cent in place of the present mo,
/ one-haif of a cent, us the pro- the
N OF the trust. It cannot denv eau
he senate bill compels the supar the
70 pay into the treasury $4,000. den
me 100000 900 blackmail now tina
o 1t yearly by the people, and par
III other taxes on sugar levied hv ore,
'nate bill go into the treasury legi
NOT deny, and cannot deny, that yea,
'he Mckinley bill we must paw to Bla,
trust $50. 000. 900 blackmail Tn
RS we have done since 1900 and !. duce'
OF aenythat the defeat OF a dem. nara
reform measure which cuts this predi
iail down is what the trust which
KING for. 1t cannot meat curse
'r figures. 1t dare not ouote NJ mas C
.sen' law or the proposed law. has b,
IS nothing left but to denonnca tar tn
ne paid advocate of the sugar been
between 1886 and 1890 there wns IN tn
TACT or a figure in connection sa, 4tr
lie exposure OF the sugar trusts corpor
; In any newspaper or in anv of cor
ntterance that did not supply; the M
or writer furnished anything. diccs
> same defender Of protection until a
me for my persistent and til
IN the sugar trust. as "tbe n,id ment r
a gang of foreign importers" Wy, ' n.
'r hired by British gold" to de- less.'
men. The exposure that And
OF the sugar trust blackm,,l now ge
1856 and 1890 forced a reduc. , tIsas ia
me present theft Of $40, 900, 900. ton Is
l am fighting now to either emf and the
ckmail off altog ether or reduce you &C
this protection bunco- houd.'
49,. me as the paid agent a thing
lrus.' IN order to defeat anv bine, a
n keep the 500, 900, 900 black. airy gral
the trust u 4, hundred
pocket to shout stop thief, cursed
This editor has sucb bines, c
&c IN the stupidity and ignor. salary 3
MS readers that he knows II sfnna Q
successful in ~diverting atten.
: himself to call me a hire. OP
ne sugar trust" Not one ~
,rs cares ano,,,h a.. - VI ~
i'm down to a.. ''u'n that
he had su f3c;ent intsi,: aho should
stand them -T,r,R 'hce himself
,rld. III sible in
r,o,- ..-- Of fndi
'r'O'T PRODUCERS. =