The sun., 1894-03-22
NO DALLYIyG IN THIS COURT.
JUSTICE sEB8RICK LIKES 10 HiTE
THINSS LfIkLE


NE T.ns ate. P-is. to Hurrv Ne H.r AZ.
swsrs ts Hsr srti Against q Nsn A. Par
sons, ana Csu- Dswu I've L.vrers.
The suit Of Miss clara ". Price for the re-
eovery OF o., 900 damages from 0RSun 4 Par
sons. tho opticians at ) Wsst Forty-second
street camc up for trial yesterday. after nsar-
ly three yosrs Of conversations correspond
ence. and propositions between the LAWYER for
ths plaintiff and the lawyer for the defendant
before Justice sedgwieS in the Superior Court
Miss Price is a school teacher. and has sui-
fsred from weak eyes for fourteen yssrs. In
July 1sBi, she found that her sys-e glasses
sp.ctaolss. to be more sxact-vere straininE
her sTss so she went to Dr. D. II 81 John
Rooss the eye and ear specialist TO see II she
needed new ores.
He examined my eyes" she said In court.
and gave me q prescription Tor new pair
took the prescription to GaNun 4 Parsons
and had the glasses made by them. After
wearing them q short while l was frequently
seized with attacks Of vertigo Iwould sud-
denly become dizzy. apparently without cause.
and would not know what to DO. Sometimes
after these attacks were over would see dou-
BILE. I had headaches all the time and was
always nervous. Thintine l was working too
hard. I went into the country to rest. but the
attacks Of vertigo we're as frequent a. ever.
when came back TO the city I went to Dr..
Edward II. Coz. an oculIst IN Harlem. He ex-
smined my eyes several times. aud finally
gave me . prescription for another pair OF
slssssa I took this prescription to GaNun
Parsons slso and found to my surprise that II
was exactly the same as that which DIR. Roosa
had given me Then I found that mistake
had been made The glasses which they had
given me the first time were not made accord
ing TO the prescription. have learned since
that the wearing Of those glasses had caused
the attacks Of vertigo and the double vision
which had troubled me-"
Lswysr George D. Bssttys appeared for the
plaintiff and Lawyer J. o'Nslll for the de-
PENDANTS LAWYER o'Neill moved to dismiss
the case on the ground that IL disclosed only .
breach Of IN implisd varrantse for which dam
agss sosld not be claimed. This motion was
denied and the plaintiff wac called to the
stand. she testified that when DR.. Rooss pre-
isfiS:s Il 'ns sS sssSsc but ' ia: esSs g
the M h'sn wnien 20 ~ eve ans ne sss
MIS-. Prise. s,S. :ss his, his HSnSFt, ",wSSGs 70.
She. . school teacher explained her
LAWYER. earnestly. - though that accounted
'0f Ls~s.r sSsf %S.n. IN ero..-.x.min..!on. tried
through 10 asonp:t.nss e aif 4. but he and sos
max. much pIoeIssns She insisted that the
sss sar::G u 3. :hs
ward And .,tsmpt to oOmpronise the matssrr
did you not ask them to make . pair Of
sold.rimmsd I'd glasses for your mother. to settle
= .LawysE UNsin Questioned her. about her
visite to Or. Cox and other physicians, with
visw to showing that her general health was
want 70 s.y to sh: with r.m.rted
her q answer that question il she does not
But var. 70 ;sox !, ;s that II. the u, dsi:s,vs
''sS She doe. not hav. to tell Of her converse
'iops H., with ply sieiAns unless"
Please do not interrupt me-"
:. il you listen to me you will learn some-
thing moro .hsn is In your head l."
I|Ars You talking YETI,
the .nS nae Sg as me" ..
A moment later whsn Justice sedxwiek had
.5ss: ass: H. Ss. s.H syns his
viii ask the question In thls--
hi, Enno, EiI ask ySS 70 keep :sii ,n;:.rup'.a
dir.eay % hSnS !" ~.p,i.mssr i se nave 70 speak SO
Thsys Was . m9msnts silence. Then Law
We'll" ansswered the witness" after long
hSsiss %s.si Ssi, .!rcn. n9' robust wouldn't call
oh M please az t.nswsr .G whs.hsr you sr. strong
moment later rTswyer Bssttys rose 70 his |
feet with a mild Your Honor, object"
Honor.
The case will 20 on this morning. The de- |
fence will probably produce q number OF OK |
pert witnsssSs. who. by means OF charts and |
DIAGRAMS, will attempt to show that the dIfisr-
ence IN the slsssss that were ordered and |
the plaintiff very seriously.