New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1894-04-03

the man II hurts him. but X does not ue'uIy
him. II ne Sc young or unmarried Wa A.. ;" 80 80
only injury thai may not ne serious. Ia, va, a.
advice that would give tho young N'.HdH ~
the young man would De basel entirely up'" '"'
circumstances" , 9. eva.
you would ro. give h. sln" awe" - ''e
man thu; yol would - the woman.
That would depend. ca. upon c.renrs'i'c,,s'
II the young man came 20 me- undrr soinT err err
cumstances I would say that DEAN az; I'm
would - better ton Ling with Ulat h''" 10
The august car.as, ride was tho basis fer
many l'r,iru'ar anu minute qn.5U1nr' 80 h'r
ambition 10 become an authorees and She NEG
George Eliot up as al example " all sH- "oH'N
like t. be" ,,.......,,
relations with women during his married NE, ana
after Judge Wilson had made statement %
what such conduct on the part 0f MARIE" hiH ii
meant Colonel BreckinrdFe sap!; NAT ~ an
true. ard more than you have SAID: ne" IL. ~,
lived man who had less excuse Tor DONG WIZ
| did than had. There Is no FORM IN Miii ,n
you could put the question mat couid Hi@he i,,1
wish to Iqlliat" in the slightest degree li' CON
dltions surrounding me at that tine. haSr no
defence t. make for It. but that it happened 'HdI
Much OF the examination which followed was
unsuitable for publication. TIC ociond'nt V" ,
tinucG: tn punishment have received Is W. J.,
punishment | shall have 20 submit 10. heT' -
but one ucseible thing which dii net deSeTN"
for nay punishment. and VII! II dld mos, pyr,.
lively refuse to accept and that was - many
Miss Pollard left the courtroom at TINS poih'
accompanied by Miss Ellis. ,. .Ao
Colonel Brcclnr.dge went oyor aEd" ",G
s.ory Of their Grrt VISIT to Sarah CESS, and i"id
If ais SURPRISE AZ her knowing about We ".'C''
lie also Told Of their agreement 70 mot IN IN
cinnai. and 20 10 the house OF M'S "o'''
\ MYSTERIOUS LETTER
Tho witness vas here asked II he knew a GER
tain person who did typewriing In the Corridors
Of the Capitol and whose name was gwen re
said he might know her If ne saw her, puI ula
not remember her b. name. - -
Iudgn Wilson next asked the witness IL ne
had a sister in Louisville. Colonel BrcchlhlluSe
said he had a sister Mary there ono..,r, han
Then came one 81 TIE HloSI iH'O'''''''7 F
"Haye YOU a sister Louise?" asked Judge Will
son.
did Won ever take a letter to a typewriter IN
the Capitol tor copying addieS'c" NY i''@'
Sister Louise" -, ,o,,o~ 7
hav. no sister Louise. / have sls'er-ih-ia"
whose name is Louise-but call her Lou .,,
II ,,as The belief 90 those Who have ioI''"ci ''
course of the trial that juice ;'S' VAN" ~,
Louise Wilson" the name MISS f'iiaru "a? .
she assumed While in Cincinnati aiteL n'' rr'..
Gnement in 1855 The defence has trled 10 prov,
| that Miss pollard did not give birth 10 Il cih.,
in Cincinnati and that she had heard tnaI " XII
| named Louise Wilson was at ST joseph = f"uHu-
ling ASYLUM and had pretended mar II "a' "e'
| assumed name 10 strengthen her case 49,, $500.
:f1 ,bat lcttor'' asl.ci Judge Wilson. did You
not say that :ou were looking forward 10 inc
! tine when Wy would e., h me. ana tilal ~ .l
were anticipating with pleasure the NEE ilhS WIZ
/ this cOTrcsp rdent WhoH You uc'O'''0 " '
! dear sister Louise , ,.or
| ~ have not the slightest recollection OF ever
having written such a letter. II you can p:quu,C,g,
! the letter so that can refresh my memory WI!
h.. glad TO say whether | wrote il or not Al
! prcsent | am not prepared Il say hd' tl'..
! never was any such letter. Will ''ot '"@ u'i'
| I see the letter. | have no recollection oi any
| euch jo,tr |: does not sound Ike my core
| spondcnco. ana don't believe that any sum
! letter was ever in existence.
! There wer, many objections 10 Judge wilson ;
questions uv the defence. Colonel thompson SOU
| the questions were not proper uhlcsS '"e i'''V'
! ,Judre Bradley said he understood that the
lo.tsr y,o9 not in the possession OF the piainuii
| and could not be produced. lie dld NOT 'iii!N
! he questions should extend beyond trying 10
| ascorfaif from the witness whether ne Itieii.-
! bered the letter and Things conneC'ei VI. :.
/ Iuign Wilson said he believed the letter. was IN
| cXirtcnce bat lie could not produce !, now. re
would therefore LEI the matter 20 over u'lul 10
| morrow moruirg But Judge Nison next qu'S-
zion was On TIE sane line. 80
| .I)id vow in the fan of 1856 he sal1 take 10
| Miss Louise Lowell che typewriter Wi'"s' n"'i'
| bad heon previously mentioned envcloIes !" -
! addressed Miss Madeline TOi'diu' % 'iP0'"
~ - cd not" said Colonel Rrcchnridge !
/ know | never did / did not do anything oi the
sort. 1- y,-u-o,
some more questions from judge ME"n
/ lr.,;gbt out as vigorous dcnalf from coon
! 1,roc,fiYridg.. that he had ever taken cnye'"e'
! IN Mics Lowell To- he Addressed Judge N''r'
| e3il he would not pursue thiS IL. 'i lli-
further to-day, as Il was 80 near "--"ui '.'I'.
and shortly before y. m. the court ADJOURNED