Richmond dispatch. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1884-1903, 1894-04-24
POCOM0K ECASE0URS
4 Victory for Virginia All Along the
Line.
EsUYLsSDERS MUCH DISAPPOINTED.
49,, n..t.,cn Goes Farther Than Was
Hoped for by the Old Dominion
Lawyers.

WASHINGTON, April 2.-iSpeciaL)-
-. r.s,l,c lycla handed down an opinion
. .., i'm the Pocomoke-oyster case. and
,.... s.,ts,,n was a victory for Virginia
.. along the lire. the main points MADE
,t. state with Maryland in the oeie-
,..t.l controversy being sustained. At
. ...,. General scott was present While
.-. decision was being read, and go was
.....r.,-Gsneral Poe. OF Maryland.
...,kaq of the decision this afternoon
,.,.,rs. General scott said Il WAS
...t victory for the rights for which
,.......l cou'cadcd The argument ior
ell. -.,t. had apparently been sustained
o.. = Instance ty the Court. and the
...... v.ald no doubt give great salts
t., in Virginia. ana particularly In
f.. .....r country.
,.. rr.r-C-noraI Scott was prepared
- r.. decision. lie confidently expected
. ....I Doe in favor OF Virginia, and
.....I I.yr been 90 very much Disappointed
,.l u been Otherwise. lie was led
...... OBJ. decision would b. favorable
.... f.. .sflons that we've asked py
t.. ..t.... .r thr court when the case
... sr.-.l and ne believed also that
,.-..... undoubtedly had the tw ana the
....- ar rr side The Attorncy-General
A. NI. evening for Eichmond
CONGRESSMAN JONES HAPPY.
.r-..e-.uau Jones. who aiap made an
...r.st 80 ctfs WIS very hAp'y
n ts.it am as'i today that
court won't even f3rther than De
..t fn..I il deciding that ny
t. .aH-ht r sra 'aing mish; pos
800 "'i - sex lf'" ,n ''"t
-i -" ''', 80
i. niN' h' II u. "'. ,'"F"'
.Nf courts, ana rms VIII nav"
O.s w' H.c' J" 'Nn''"t o.
JUSTICE"
.- r.- further Said hot y was
... .In.r. 'ulttiou ih"t ihr court ma
..r..l f.r ella ins ~ Nirg.uic IN every
ft't ..'ir. end h' t'.t sau3-
fHe n'.. SION w. u.d u' hah'i WIN
IF t,r plo3i" i1 lis section oI
Dice ir1l,it WIT ia 'H.t'
..'u "f .onm"n"' ia ~ = %
''' f Di N'''n''' to-'"f' W..
r.r' i1 fic y'tum'rf9 before me
trI cou'Ii.' % Wuch toward eN-
ft. c.
.e.u..rs wore 'n th' court
.l .Nl t.t 'l -.N1 Was Ni,f 'H'
fH' flN la-"f fti"i iheHl-
'-f fi- cisio1 "anii %" ~
Tift Naa dl "a. n'b.y a.
f.r' a1atic. Fitd W.nt inio
.I .IaIrsrr 1ie- 'n "f ~" cn-
o' tfa compact but soon hr
.. fre f1l i'l,' "a, ISSUE anu
IrirrH i'n1i IN i"n "S,
."..H.r. lrl'i1' r.'t' in h'S ""
D. .....f..I -lu'rlt iH" uNhS''l"'7
r f.o ,uHI. g.
Ti'. APPEAL.
.... ,... ON a-re,l from
....m... ,f tu. 'reH; Co1r, for the
t.f. Itr.ri oi Virginia refusing ~
.r.. it"i.t }. "liI'"h %" WI
.t..H- corpus VI ''' .'s
i.Ar i- N- b." i'' .' ,'- ,,,,',.,...i
&c. " H'.' -. 80 ,,io'
,-..'.,,t, ,,l,,,b pro-
.i'r ,.. .... ,,r othar sheu-
.... e..to Iv anV
.. - ,,, Stato
l"' .'.' '-.' ....., p',..,,,i-s sound
.,tl nf H.. ,ndictui mt
..,.i v,,ut ~ mrisdic-
....-.. r,lrts q, try him
a.. ..,is'. tur. Of
,,,,,,.,,,o,, y.as
"' ..i.,t.J or. ratified
-, ,,.,,,iouI and he
..., of IN, between
tt.I.,... SIN in force. the
t..,..,,..r, sound were a part
. ,,..-.,.t.. river. which was men
BE-. r,.. c.i.uqct The court h,ld
o.. f... ,u.ua,.i.at and fined Whar-
.r,, ,,,.t..,nant of the United
,......,, S.r,t refused To intcrfcre
-...,...l ts. r.tiiiou for writ of
... ..rrus From that judgment the
I...uar arraal.d 90 the United States
...,...n, Cont
... ,.,...r-rnN-
-. ....,,,l 1,,etico Iriald
i. IN ,hn romrart mlde
,., .,.. - Jarvlrnd ana Nir-
.,..r mo jntorprctation Of
.,. .rr,inntion of the contro-
....',.5 That comn9ct. the JUS
.',.- o.t, ~ tho incouvcuicnces
......i ,.'' tha ci,lzons Of both states
49,. o.,ot of eefabnshcl and recog-
,....i r.-rlsiipus between them respecting
,..,r y,t.ch formed a boundary between
ft4.t Nr.. 4 i