St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1894-05-10
saying that he did not care to have him
(Sherman) present them.
When Mr.. Sherman finished the tariff
hill WAS laid hefnre the senata

(Shermanl present them.
When Mr.. Sherman finished the tariff
bill was laid before the senate.
THE COxEY RESOLUTION
went over till tomorrow. when, accord
ing to notice served. Senator Teller
and others will seek to be heard upon 1t.
Mr.. Aldrich took up the second
amendment in the tariff bill, which is
the words ''or Withdrawn for consump.
tion." the purpose being to include
goods so Withdrawn from bonded ware
bill to goods imported. This precip-
itated running discussion, in which
Messrs. Jones. of Arkansas; Chandler.
Of New Hampshire; Vest, OF Missouri;
Hale. of Maine: Harris, of Tennessee,
and Mills, OF Texas, took part.
Mr.. Chandler estimated that the
amendment would give the owners of
imported goods three or four million
dollars. Senator Hill suggested that
the theory seemed to be ITO give away
the difference in rates and make it UP in
the income. tax" After some further
running debate MIR. Aldrich got the
floor and succeeded III arr0using Mr..
Mills. He began by re erEing to his
assertion in the senate ten days ago
that over 800 amendments would he
brought in. He knew then. that his
statement was true. Yet it had been
met with the most tumultuous deniaIs
: from everyone in authority on the
other side. His statement as to the
amendments had been too conservative.
he had understood the radical cliarac-
ter and the number of changes made.
Those amendments deliberately aband-
Oned every principle ever advocated by
q tariff reformer. They made increases
from ~ 70 500 per cent ana with
GRAND SWEEP
changed the duties rrom al valorem to
speclf1c. he read extracts from the
speecnes OF Senators voorhees, aud
Mills, made at ihe opening and closing
OF the general debate. denounclng ln
snSc;1sc dntia. rn ama,In,v t ,Sat 5st0 ,;i ~
az now mosiit;ed would n,oon . s,,rrnn'
Dor OF of tms nrirc,nSes % of 3 l;fe suL ti0n.
Af.ar tb;s 30 sa;d Sn S,S ~ " .hinh, io .,.a.c
WaS si,,s,io ss M saMo,nr on +ho ' n,,,ar s;de
Who who unnId have the o temer,tu @ ns tn ono s,uv
,;s ofIe~;.n"a ~ thy cSino.,nS Sia,sar, ~ avv"
msa nis aleg,aass d - 10 .he CnaeasG p'atl0rtn.
stis IVY w a ~ re- NV ,,IS . saa
T. ,nitho,,t st,,itItv;nn h;,ns.If =, ,,;a ~
his artv y,Iatforn A ~. ''s" u
No, 30 e vnm mnde,a+ard tho n,o+-
forn, y, s,,C,sst,d NJ paI,,,a. VIC p'"s-
..Tho ~ nisssfor% o"ndamns pan,,h,;oo,
,-otaot,a,, ~ as ,nanmsti,M.;one Hi nePuu,lS"n S
tranJ M ro,,hars, ;, SOD NJ ,ariah %.G
ssVas - ;,,tar;Setsd M va.t .s,t ~.
damnS Rannht}can nrnta.tion MI ), ~ son-
a.is thsre anv diffpre,,ca ~ ), es,ad NJ
Aldr;ch sarc.siicaIiv ..hat1,aan D.
nnhiican and Dsmncyatic nrotact;on o.,
"a rraat SIaoI ;, rantisd nj VeSt
M Mi,is of irer.s su eu;dan,,., & eSs a. ~.
th;ni a. He arose at this noiyt u Tha rUs
shafts ~ tho Rhode leland aen.tnr had hnd
avidentiv rona homo and he ,uas Ioh"r
- .anai tbo ;dea thas ~ nv, q, ansou
resnana;IIe For what NJ Aidriob IL %a5 ha5
~ terwed the - A"' - 0'0'''A n"0
nEWocp Alto s,,pppunrp
a rev Gays ago. ne Degun, ne mad de-
scrlned MS, own position as between the
devn ana tue deep sea, the mckinley
Dill DeinR the oevli. since tnat Tune
cnange nao come over the s'tuatlon. he
was nearer tne uevl ana nau not as
mucn sea room as oeIore: lLaugnter.l
he now 1ound tnas tne Dlll before the
as Sad oy sa1
introouceu, nag no resemblance 10 the
Wilson bill. 1t ought, ne said. to
pGar M prne sne Sne Nn NOV o dnr;d MI oIman ,n1 OF
MT. b!lce. NO man couio torture into
an ADMISSION that TINS Dill was re-
said that taxation shonld he levied m
value: that it was the only Just system:
that taxation should not be imposed as
under the specific system of the McKin-
ley bill, so that the goods of the rich
would escape with the same tax as was
levied upon the cheaper articles of the
poor. There he had stood and there he
would continue to stand. He rose to
say that he did not intend to vote for a
siagle one of the amendments carrying
q change to specific duties. 1t was
humiliating enough to have to indorse
the system of robbery contained in the
Mckinley. bill without bowing down In
Of protection. The first amendment