The Hawaiian gazette., 1894-05-08

Topg; unlawful possession of opium.
Appeal from Honolulu District Court.
Davidson for defendant.
Jacob Lyons VS.. j. Hubash and G..
Bachelor; assumpsit. Carter x Car
ter for plaintiff; G. w. Ashford for
defendant Bachelor.
Louisa Rodriguez VS.. Doningos
Comes; covenant. Carter & Carter
for plaintiff; C. w. Ashford for de-
fendant.
L. Ahlo VS.. Tai Lung; sssumpsit.
C. w. Ashford for plaintiff; Hatch for
defendant.
S. A. Newell VS.. ]. NJ. Horner; ac-
ton on foreign judgment. Neumann
for plaintiff; c. w. Ashford for de-
fendant.
William A. Dyer VS.. Hop Yune
Company; assumpsit. G. Brown for
plaintiff; c. w. Ashford for defend
ant.
H. R. Macfarlane VS.. Ira A. Lowell;
assumpsit. Carter & Carter for plain
tiff; Hatch for defendant.
Hawaiian Lodge VS.. f. III. Redward;
assumpsit. Carter & Carter for plain
tiff; c. w. Ashford for defendant.
Il. w. Rawlius VS.. Honolulu Soap
Works Company; damages. c. Brown
Kinney for plaintiff; Hartwell-Hatch
for defendent.
Ralph R. Foster VS.. H. NJ. Hayward;
trespass on the case. Foster for plain
tiff; Neumann for defendant.
Thomas Mott VS.. A. McDowall ct al:
assumpsit. Appeal from Honolulu
District Court. Kinney for plaintiff
appellant; V. V. Ashford for defend
ants.
HIgashi VS.. Pacific Sugar Mill; case.
Neumann-Foster for plaintiff; Hatch
for defendant.
Julia J. Freitas VS.. JOaO f. SouZa;
breach of promise Of marriage. Ma
goon for plaintiff; c. w. Ashford for
defendant.
]. A. Magoon VS.. Yee King Tong;
eiectment. Magoon for plaintiff;
Davidson for defendant.
JURY WAIVED.
Hoomana KaoaO VS.. VIM. Norton;
replevin. Appeal from Honolulu Dis
trict Court. Wakefield for plaintiff
Carter & Carter for defen-
dant.
Allen & Robinson VS.. G. w. Lin
coin ct al; assumpsit. Hatch for
plaintiff; MagoOn-Kinney for defen-
dants.
Kamai VS.. Anima; assumpsit. Ap
peal from Honolulu District Court.
Kaulia for plaintiff; Achi for defen-
dant appellant.
F. n. Redward VS.. Mrs. B. Fireman;
assumpsit. Appeal from Honolulu
District Court. Magoon for plaintiff;
Neumann for defendant appellant.
John Mott VS.. G. w. Lincoln ct al;
Magoon for plaintiff;
Hatch Kinney for defendants.
Honolulu Steam Planning Mill VS.. p.
ct al; assumpsit. Ma
COON for plaintiff; Hatch Kinney for
defendants.
Lee King VS.. d. K. Publ; assump-
sit. Appeal from Honolulu District
Court. v. V. Ashford for plaintiff;
w. R. Castle for defendant-appellant.
Mrs. G. Bachelor VS.. Phil Braun;
assumpsit. Appeal from Honolulu
District Court Kinney for plaintiff;
Creighton for defendant appellant.
Y. All Yau VS.. J. K. Iaukea; dam
age. Appeal from Honolulu District
Court. Achi for plaintiff-appelIant;
for defendant.
William Kauahi VS.. All Chew; tres
pass. Appeal from Honolulu District
Court. Kaulukou for plaintiff; Car
ter & Carter for defendant-appellant.
NJ. 4. Gonsalves & Co. VS.. Luiz An
1rade; assumpsit. Appeal from Homo
lulu District Court. Johnson for plain
tiff; Magoou for defendant-appellant.
Almira NJ. kahananui VS.. G. B.
Miles; action on contract. V. V. Ash
ford for plaintiff-appellant; Kinney
for defendant.
Cheong Tai VS.. David Watson; dam
ages. Appeal from Koolaupoko Dis
trict Court. Achi for defendant-ap
pellant.
Ching On VS.. f. Ludoviko; assump-
sit. Appeal from Honolulu District
Court Magoon for plaintiff; Kaulu-
kou for defendantappellant.
Ching Sing VS.. Lau Bon; assumpsit.
Appeal from Honolulu District Court.
Carter & Carter for plaintiff; V. V.
for defendant-appellant.
Kalei Maunaloa VS.. Kealohapauole
replevin. Appeal from Wal
alua District Court.
Lau Lam Chan Vs. Lau HO; as
Appeal from Honolulu Dis
trict Court. Magoon for plaintiff
w. R. Castle for defen-
dant.
L. B. Kerr VS.. John Good ct al; as
Appeal from Honolulu Dis
trict Court. Parke for plaintiff; G.
w. Ashford for defendant-appellant.
E. B. Hookano VS. All Soon; dam
ages. Appeal from Koolaupoko Dis
trict Court. Achi for plaintiff-appel-
liant.
w. H. Rickard VS.. S. NJ. Kaaukai;
assumpsit. Appeal from Honolulu
District Court. Kahookano for plain
tiff; Achi for defendant-appellant.
Wailuu Kekaula VS.. S. NJ. Kaaukai;
assumpsit. Appeal from Honolulu
District Court. Johnson for plaintiff;
Achi for defendant-appellant.
II. n. Crabbe VS.. Z. G. Hitchcock,
Marshal; replevin. Appeal from
Honolulu District Court. a. NJ.
Brown for defendant-appellant.
DIVORCES AND SEPARATIONS.
Kuhinu wv, VS.. Kalepe. Rosa for
plaintiff: c. Brown for defendant.
Lilly Mahi VS.. Maka Mahi. c. w.
shford for pIaintiH. Kinney for de-