The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1894-05-13

IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND
for the Third Judicial district of Utah
territory. county of Salt Lake Louisa
of the estate Of Ether Coltrin. deceased,
plaintiffs, vs.. Estslle Veatch. Carlton W.
Veatch, w H. Eairchld, James Thomp
Winters, and the Salt Lake Hardware
company, a corporation. Joseph G. Arm
strong, William L. Crutcher, and a. y.
Brin. Utah National Bank. Bank of Phil
lips Elmer B. Jones and Albert T.
Jones & Schroeder, defendants.~suni-
mons.
The. people of the territory of Utah send
greeting: To Estelle Veatch, Carlton W
Neatch, w H Fairchild, James Thomp-
son, Aaron Keyser, H. P. Mason. r. Is.
company, corporation, Joseph G. Arm
strong, William z. Crutcher and a A
BIlIl the Utah National Bank, Bank of
Phillips, Elmer 3. Jones and Albert T.
Schroeder, partners doing business as
jones & Schroeder, defendants.
GU are hereby required to appear in an
named plaintiffs in the district court of
the Third judicial district Of the territory
OF tan, and to answer the complaint
nIec therein within ten days exclusive OF
the day of seryice) after the service on
you or TINS SumnonS-iI served within this
county; or, II served out of this county
out IN TINS district within twenty days
otherwise within forty days-or Judgment
by default viii be taken against YOU, ac-
cor4ing TO the prayer of said complaint.
The said action is brought to have iudg-
ment against the defendants Veatcb.
Veatch, Fairchild and Thompson. on two
causes of action as follows: First in the
sum of g. 400, with interest at 1867 per
annum until Dec. % 1891, and from Dec
p, 1881 till paid at 1159o per month and on
800 from July p. 1891 at 11s9o per month.
for 500 attorneys fee and costs of sTIit.
alleged to be due on q certain pronnissorv
note executed by defendants Veatcb
Neatch ana FaI6Shlld to one L. c. Cross
man, July Y, 1891, due Dec 22. 1891. for
g. 400. with interest till maturity at iOe5
per annun, and after maturity on all de-
ferred payments at I1a2o per month; same
being due and wholly unpaid; second in
The sum of $40 with interest al 81. pfr
month after maturity till paid and for
$50 attorneys fees; alleged to be due on a
PENDANTS Veatch,- Yeatch and Fairchiid, to
said Crossrnan, July %. 1881 with intsres1
after maturity at 90 per month, due i've
months after date for SlIO SANE bai,,e =
due and wholly unpaid; both said Dofess
being secured by mortgages on same
property, which IS hereinafter, described
executed by defendants Neatch- to said
Crossmani said notes and mortgages hay
ing been duly assigned to plaintiffs. who
are now the owners thereof: to
have said mortgages foreclosed, and
piled in payment of costs of
suit and amounts due on said two
causes of action: that interests OF other
defendants herein be declared subsequent
TO those of plainunS-and for other relief.
said premises are described as blocks %
and II, and the east one-half of block 8.
plat c, Garden City survey, Salt Lake
county, Utah.
And you are hereby notified that if Won
fail to appear and answer the said com
plant as above required, the said plaintiff
will apply to the court for the relief de-
uanded therein.
Witness. the Hon. Samuel A. Mer-
rift. Judge and the seal of the dis
trict court of the Third Judicial
(Seal) district, in and for the territory of
Utah, this nth day of February in
the year Of our Lord one thousand
eight hundred and ninety-four
DAVID c. DUNBAR,
By GEO. D. LOONIIS Clerk.
Deputy Clerk.
Young, Young & Moyle, attorneys for
plaintiff.