Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1894-09-08
AROUND The COURTS.
A Somewhat Peculiar DiTOrc1 Suit
B)IOro Judge h8rfItL
Tue LAW AND MOTION c,LESDAR.
Another Batch Of Naturalizltlous.-
A Notable Murder Case Ia
Idaho.

no WOulu make iufluor tclilug1 ifom
the law aud motion calendar on Mos.
day morning next, ut II O'Clock, such
cases to bo heard until the criminal
calendar is taken ny.
LAW AND MOTION.
Tho following cases were pnsoed to
the foot Of the calendars
Salt Lake Hardware Go. Va. VIM.
Lister.
Parker aui Dspuo VI J. J.. Heath ct
81.
wasatch Asphallum Go. 7s 81. v.
Ls 5iuur
Adele N. Buah We the Montreal
Mining, ETC., Co.
American Book 20. W G. II. Par.
sons.
Tho case Of J. A. Street Va H. D..
Kinney ct oil WIS stricken from the
calendar.
Tho case Of Davis d Rankin Build.
Ing and Manufacturing Co. W Jed
5lriuqhnm was SGT for hearing on Tuot-
gay, the 18th inst, Ou demurrer 10 con-.
plaiut.
Chas. T.. Taylor " T.. H.. Ellchlc.
In thiB case, heretofore submitted, thu
demurrer 10 complaint was now over.
ruled, an exception taken and ten days
allowed TO answer.
Matthew n. Osborn Va A. n. Butts.
Dismissed on motion oi the defendant,
plaintiff being present In court
Gray VI Dcnhsitcr. Motion for the
appointment OF u receiver set Tor hear.
ing ON Saturday, the 10Th iust.
In the case Of Charles II. Lynch W
EfAstup =. FOotr, executor, decree
quoting title was entered.
q. Williamson " the Utah Central
Railway Company ct al. Leave given
10 amend complaint
4 PECULIAR AFFAIR.
In tho divorce suit Of a lice Jones VI
John T.. Joucs, the defendant was
cited = show Chutu for alim1uy, attor.
uuy's fee, aud costs. The ease ~ In
sumo respects singular one, aud the
facts have not until this time bUun
made public.
The marriage took place IN this city
on OGlOOcr B.h, 1872. Mis-. JOues al.
icgcs tina. Tor more than four months
pflr 10 thu hliug OF the suit her hus-
band had neglected 10 provide Tor her
tue necessities Of liir, though IN con.
slant receipt VI wages amounting 10
GCOut s5J pee mouth. IL IL stated that
since their marriage the defendant has
treated his wiio IN cruel anu b..
human manner, anu Instances VI this
NaaaN asF. q 4 a..
25th, 1892, thsHnmo month IN which
tnuy were married, no struck nct with
his hand Ut the nome o. Mu. Lulu
Brown In thisolty,Grizri anu throwhvi
with great violence upon !. '''..i or
lounge, wfcpching and bodybuilding
her arms aud UUJy, also utiug abusive
aud ptoiane language. Ou October
LIT, 1898, plaintiff Avgp, her
husband violently struck her on IA q
hack, cau6ing her 10 spit ulooii
also on January l7,h, 1894, two days
after the birth " her child, whilu MI
In bed, ne again struck her, and used
foul Language; again, ON April l3.al Vi
this year he once more abused her by
words, sAying, among other things,
that Ia "did not want 10 BUu hur O.
d. inos again" Ga the day following
this hc moved an the hou'ru0ld goods
from their nome anu loit her anu net
bahn without care or shelter, eXCupI
that afforded by the charity Of frleuus
La hir answer ami crJss'c0mplain
Jones absolutely douiua the wiiG'
allegations in regard 60 tue acts o
cruelty, ETC., ana further alleges ON
Information and belief that the plain
tn. on December An, 1892, aud suDse.
uunntly, committed adultery with on,
Milo Vincent az nsr rtilinuCO IA THIS
clty; that Oh November sBn, ls02, u
bonneville. Davis county she wa
likewise guilty ~ misuJnIuct with on
Or. McDyer. Defendant turther aver
mat 0n'or about August lOlh OF TN
present year, NJ Provo, pisinin oh
Ialned license nud married One Eu
ward r. Sullivan, "clutrary 10 law,
and that thry ore At pTeiout living 10
gethor IA mAu aud vile.
Defendant declares 10y aiildavi) tha
he N now IN Atraitoucd circumstances
has not earned on an average NOR
than Sl2 per month during the pas
seven months, aud 10 wholly unable {
pay any Nimony whatever pending IN
tidal OF tho SUIT. Jones asks for 81
Vurce anu the custody OF tue infant,
Upon the affidavit presented, AT
torney Dan Harrington, ON the part u
the defendant, resisted tue application
for alimUny aud said this Gaze shout
never have been brought int0 cJurl
There were allegations u RJuI
terry on the part OF the plaintitl
aud defendant was prepared with eyl
doncs 20 prove that she aud Sullivan
the mau referred 10 IN tue defendant
affidavit, were married by Judg
Dusenberry,at PrOyo,in August Of thl
year, since which time they had bee
living together. Attorney haTTlpgtO
cited cases 10 show that where
plaintiff, a. In this case, was greatly
Ia the wrong not even temporary al
mony should be allowed.
Judge McDowall, on behalf OF Mn
Jones, urged that no matter no.
criminal the conduct Of n wOma
might be-, she was entitled TO alim0n
pnnuing tbs litigation.
The matter was argued pro and CO
for some time, and eventually Juil
Merritt granted Mrs. Jones permaneI
Alimony in the sum Of so per M ont
and $50 attorneys Tees.
Tho parties formerly resided In d
Sixteenth ward.
ANOTHER DIVORCE.
Martin X. Hardness VI Ella ]
Horkness. This was another dlvor
proceeding, the ground alleged beir
dosertlOn,
The parties interm0rried ut Boslol