New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1894-06-27

tax the state House at Montgomery or to tax the
owned 6y The s,a,c 81 Hiabaina ior FEDERAL pur
the Government OF M United states tax tho
bonds 81 Alabama directly or Indirectly. when they
were issued as facilities and inetrumcniales 81 the
state government ~ Alabama
The argument in support OF MI HnIs amend
ment was continued by senator's Gray Dem. I,-).
Pugh OeIn. Aia). Canery Dem. La. Hoar rep.
Mr. Lindsay dem, KY. and Mr. George Dem
iec,rl-yeas' n; NAYS. 30 -Four Democrats sena-
tors -Caffcry. Gray, i'm and Pugh-vo;el for the
Mr.. Morgan would have voted FOR 4 but tGr his
Par VIII Mr quay R S p prnn %n1 %9gd 1so
agans, +, and the othcr Pdpniis Senator. Mr
Kyle. was paired with Mr.. Lodge Rep. Mass).
WHY NOT TAX REAL EsTATE7
Mr.. Hn directed attention 20 the fact that the
bill put n upon the personal property acquired
by Inheritance. while 1t diI not put tax upon
the real estate acquired by Inheritance. and he
called upon MIR Vest FOR an explanation OF that IN
equality. Mr.. Vests answer was that II the bin
exempted the rents OF such real estate. the argu-
ment % the Senator from New-York would be
TIN n ana Prem @ E c %s n nnd any way
to put real estate Inheritance In the shape OF an
tors ingenuity and ability. But II the Senator de-
sired to include income not only the value Of
ami oppressive taXatiOn). h had no private
opinion about T.. Mr. III then moved to strike
OF ali personal properly acquired BY an or nheri-
lance" and made an argument In support OF that
Amendment.
SIR caaadIer Dep M yalle SAYING say yt ing,
the senator from M!--0Ii 'Slr |S.I ana hiihs"t'
tor from New YORK n mis- eon,cnion had The ~,
preme Court of the United states on hts SIDE ne
would trouble the senator from Missouri or not
flthrr The hhcTtanc" YAK ought 10 De HTu'k our
10 DO equity II ought 90 Doe imposed not only on
personal property inherited but also on real estate
inherited
for his colleague in lie House to snow that while
ne proposed I'm That bil 70 tax personal property
MI III sl.d tina; j. 'h- Senator from Missouri
should come INTO bis onice and wan, him % draw
ds,rbu;cd he VOID draw / in iha way and not
be held responsible keep for The Legality 4 the
VIII. 50 he declined 20 be he'd responsible for
mcmbrr Of the House. simply az a matter Of favor.
s,bs:1n;laiy cory II the Inherltancc law Of the
STATE OF New-York. with some few alterations.
81 on Ills Vote thcrr were no defectlons from the
Democratic ranks except in the case OF Mr. Hi
''''' .... ....,....,.,....,a
EXEMPTION OF TIE PRESIDENTS SALARY.
Mf. M'i@ur'" "'c"'' MIS- i"''eH ~ ',1oi'''''
the votes whereby. some days ago. the salaries OF
80 ,, 49,. .,,,,.t ,, 49, iro1r,o cav
't.''' |u.S'' WI va w. 49,,
Mr.. Hi Inquired whether Mr.. McIaurln had
voted IN the affirmative on those amendments
Mr. McI,aurr said that he had not but that.
the vote had nor been taken by yeas and nays. he
uieiEtoot my ng rg - nj bos N" had voted
in the Affirmative he added that ne made the mo-
lion FOR reasons which he id not deem II necessary
to give. ,,.. ,o
Mr harr's uDeh., I'm M ~ Pau ,, -, % h,cl
and reconsider a matter already disposed Of WAS
49,. e. knenlne with the spirit Intent and purpose
Of me mnan.mous consent under which the Senate
was acting
Mr. McIaurln suggested. IN rather sarcastic