The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1894-05-24

policy, but much as deplore the fasten-
Ing Of an income tax in any form upon our
tariff bill. 1 cannot ignore the fact that
leagues honestly differ from myself in this
matter, and are so confident OF the sound
ness Of their position that they are willing
thus enabling the people to see its actual
workings and TO pass upon II directly,
leries as he closed and Senators gathered
about his desk congratuIating him.
Mr.. Allison spoke at some length In reply
20 Mr.. German. expressing regret that the
Maryland Senator had not gone more into
detail in his review OF the history OF the
been trying to ascertain the principle I'M
DERIVING the bill. and now, for the hrst
time. learned from Mr. German that Dill
was to be made discriminating in favor of
American labor and substituting PreSldent
Cleveland's letter of acceptance OF lss2 as
interpreted by Mr.. German, for the plat
form OF 1892
When Mr.. Teller arose Republicans and
mpe3dine 1 He was interested. Mr.. Teller
said TO learn from Mr. German that a ma
jority Of the Senate would support the COM n,
learning that the Democratic party was
standing not on the Chicago platform but
Known M that fSe party aa the
Chicago platform. so far as silver was con-
Ssrn S It M fae the Tst fme today
that Mr.. Cleveland's utterances TOOK
precedence over the plank OF the party
what Mr.. German said, he was in doubt as
TO the condition Of the other side. The
MARYLAND Ian senator hS Would h0' SUPPORT the
bill He said that majority OF the senate
would support it, How many Popuists
up a majority Of the Senate? Were there
any backsliders among the Democrats!
These d were al sSeTy Senator Show his
colors he would move to lay the tarin Dill
haT
II created CONSERVATION on both sides. The
bells rang and pages were sent scurrying
through the corridors TO drum up every
available Senator in order that the Iull
strength might be polled on the vote. Mr..
Butler. who was in the BARRIERS chair when
a messenger found him. came in with one
side Of his face shaved. The roll call was
watched with intense interest curiosity be-
ing particularly manifested as 10 now
Messrs. Hill. Irby and PETER would vote.
The Democratic line did not show single
gap, and the three avowed Populists, Allen,
ton was defeated-2S to 3s-as follows:
Yeas-Aldrich. Allison. Cameron. Chand-
Ter. Davis Dolph, Dubois. Frye. GallInger.
Eile, Hansbrough, Hawley, Higgins. Hoar.
Lodge, Mcmillan, Henderson, Mitchell OF
Oregon, Morrill,, Patton, Pettigrew, Platt,
Power. Quay, Sherman, Shoup, Squire, Tel
NaysEAllen. Bate Berry. Blackburn,
Blanchard, Butler. Caffery. Camden, Cock
rell, Coke, Daniel, Faulkner, George, Glib
son. Gordon, German, Gray. Harris. Hill.
Hunton, Irby, Jarvis, Jones of Arkansas,
Kyle, Lindsay. Martin, Mills, Morgan. Muir
ply, Palmer, Pasco, PETER, Pugh, Ransom,
Smith, Voorhees,, Walsh and Whites
The pairs were as follows, Democrats be-
ing given first: Brice and Wolcott. Call and
Proctor, Mitchell OF Wisconsin and Carey.
Mcpherson and Cullom, McLaurin and
Dickson, Villas and Jones Of Nevada, Roach
and Perkins. Turpie and Wilson. Vest and
Washburn. Stewart, the Nevada Populist,
was absent and impaired.
At $50 the Senate went into executive