The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1894-01-10
THE COURT RECORD.
Supreme Court Opinions.

1901 James H. Laycock VS.. State Mar
lon G. c. Affirmed. Daley, J.-When no
exception was taken 10 the action of the
trial court in overTuling a motion TO quash
an indictment, the question OF the sufficien-
cy OF the indictment does not arise. 2 The
failure to designate the injured party in
the indictment with particularly as a cor
poratiOn or association is cured by verdict.
170C2. James c. Lavelle VS. State. Pike
9. G. Affirmed Howard, G. J.-Nerbal re-
fnementS In the constituting of criminal
pleadings are not in harmony with the
and phrases defined by law the words used
must be construed in their usual accepta-
ton in common language.
1894. Charles Fleming VS. State. Madi-
son c. c. Reversed. Hackney, IAN in
dictment for grand larceny stating time
to the com omission of the offenSe, or i'm
perfectly stating time, is not subject TO
ant formed the design TO obtain a railroad
ticket and sum Of money by deception,
and intended at the time to appropriate
company of them-held larceny. s. a gem
eral instruction does not authorize the re-
fusal of a specific instruction applicable to
the charge and the evidence.
Appellate Court Opinions.
1O49. T, st. /. & X. c. r. r. Co. vs.. Ben
jamin Fly. Montgomery G. c. Affirmed.
Gavin, IA railroad company is not re-
fence %oad at ereRT SR With he
operation of the road in the discharge Of
its duty to the public or endanger the safety
den of showing that the road ought not 10
be fenced at the given place is upon the rail
road company.
1853 Western Union Telegraph Company
VS.. Edward Bierhous ct al. Daviess c. c.
Reversed. Reinhard, J.-The statutory pen.
atty of 500 cannot be recovered on account
Of the willful disclosure OF the contents of
a telegraphic dispatch by the company
through its agents or employees.
99l. Board, ETC.. VS.. Alonzo Blair, admins
county is only bound to repair such bridges
as II is authorized 10 build. 1t is not neces-
sary that the county should have built the
it in repair. for a bridge may become a
county bridge by adoption: This duty. ex-
tends TO necessary approaches and ratings.
Superior Court.
Room flames Nj. Winters, Judge.
Benjamin +. Gresh VS.. Samuel Y. Owens;
note and mortgage. Dismissed.
Rhoda r. White VS.. BENJAMIN f. White;
to set aside deed. Dismissed.
Henry Schnull ct al VS.. Mary A Shing-
Teton; foreclosure. Dismissed and costs
paid
Room 2-J. W. Harper. Judge.
Henry. Schnuii ct al. VS.. Anna Fitzgerald
ct al; foreclosure of mortgage. Dismissed
by plaintiff and costs paid.
William Z. Allison VS.. John Blumburg ct
al: damages. Tried by court Finding for
defendant.
Room S-Plny w. bartholomew, Judge
Insurance Company of North America VS.
l.. y. & w. Railroad Company ct al; dam
ages. On trial by jury.
Augusta CordeS VS.. Herman COrdes: di-
vorce Dismissed and costs paid.
William III. Lancaster George i.
Young ct al; note. Dismissed and costs
paid.
Circuit Court.
Edgar A. Brown. Judge.
Indiana Mutual Building and Loan AssO-
citation VS.. Mary +. Hubbartt ct al: fore
closure. Judgment against defendants for
81, 302. 50 and decreo of foreclosure.
The Bradford Well and Pump Company
VS.. John Davis; account. Judgment in favor
OF plaintiff for sos.
Criminal Court.
Willard f. Cox, Judge.
State VS.. Charles Hoyle; petit larceny.
workhouse six months and fined SO and
costs.
State VS.. Ollie Ross; petit larceny. Tried
by court. Under Amusement.
New Suits Filed.
Charles f. Whitsett VS.. Georgia Wright;
on account Superior Court, Room 8.
Henry Schnull ct al. VS.. William Z. Etris
ct al. foreclosure mortgage. Superior Court,
Room 2.
Charles II. Gilliland VS. Indiana TruSt
Company ct al; for accounting, to declare
a trust and quiet title. Circuit Court.
Mary E. Cleaveland ct al. VS.. Ohio Fence
Company ct al; specific performance and
Injunction. Superior Court, Room 3.
John McGettigan VS.. Newlsnd T. DePauw
ct al; to set aside contract of sale. Circuit
Court