Delaware gazette and state journal. (Wilmington, Del.) 1883-1902, 1894-03-29

sharnly of these last Two, saying that they
s ,...'. :s,,nrIv tiniit 10 be read before
c mu,g thnt lie would gladly exclude them
If br coud. and he expressed the hope
lint the counsel would see ~ 70 oti'e 'no
disvr,lceful obscene matter III theni,
lie sustained the objections WniSh nav
beeu made to the derositlohs OF JILL JILL
O'Toole, Dr. Green and " l' Nv a ai
thev were based on hearsay. ny, LeMl1
il lie physician who testified thai SoioHnI
Swonei the late Republican candidate iol
CONGRESS in the Lexington district, huu
asked him to perform al apoftloh upon
Miss Pollard. H., ,,,,to. ,rd of
Resell, who hnd been engaged 10 MISS
Pollard, while she was in the wesleyan
Institute, were ADMITTED, the Judge ~.
tending that the plhintili had placed hel
character and her maturity ~ ilensuie
in question by that clause q lhe ~. aeei hasr
lion which uverrcd that she hao peeli
seduced and that she was mere Bltl
when Col. Breckenridge met her; a..
Each side filed objections to the rulings
! against It.. -, a,,sr,oa
Attorney Stoll proceeded To read the ue,
position of Joseph c. Bailey, clerk OF the
| Woodford county circuit court at YER
| sailics, Ky, From the records OF tne
court the clerk had testified that III 1921
there were indictments for murder asalhsi
Ollie and Il. 7. Brown and that Golons ozone
| Breckinridge had been one of the detellu,
ing attorneys. 1t appeared that the trlal
was in progress on August 9th, the DAY
upon which Miss Pollard has testified that
| tie colonel took her to the house vi oarah
Guess, in Lexington, also on August LIN
| 18TH, 10th.
Tie cross.examination If the clerk, read
bv Young Attorney Farrell OF Lexington
developed the further Information that
during this trial Colonel Breckinridge had
frequently driven over from Lexington,
returning at night and sometimes bringing
his wife. He had attended the whole trlal
OF Ollie Brown, although some OF the
LAWYERS had not.
1 WASHINGTON. March Pin the Pollard
breckenridge case, this morning, the de,
fence called to the witness stand the chief
OF police. Major Moore, in whose Office
there had been two promises made by Col
Breckenridge to marry Miss Pollard, on
MAY 18th and 18th, 1888. 1t was proposed
to contradict some Of Miss Pollnrd's state
ments regarding those interviews
Major Moore denied that i'll either OF thu
two interviews Colonel Breckenridge hat
said this s one Of lifes tragedies" o
that he had said anything about Miss Pol
lard hearing two children or being pre6
nant. In neither interview had Colone
breckenridge said "she knew was mar
ried man when she took me" nor ha
Miss Pollard said Eyes, gave myself 7
him."
When Judge Wilson asked If anythin
had been said or done In that interview t
indicate that the promise OF marriage wa
! merely a scheme between the two partit
not made in good faith, the defence va
! strenuous in It's objections, protesting tht
! it called for an opinion which could be til
> province Of the jury. not Of II witnes
!. Judge Bradley admitted il, however, all
the major said nothing had been done
= the sort to indicate scheme such as ha
: been described.
y MAY ExPEL BREcKlERIDGE.
: CHICAGO. ILL.,, March 27.-The Unic
> League Club, the most influential soci
l. organization of Chicago. is, 1t is said sci
d ously considering the question of expellil
T. Congressman breckenridge from honoral
l. membership. There are but three nam
II on the clubs list of honorary member
3. ex-President Harrison, ChaunCey
II Depew and the Kentucky Congressman.