The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1894-05-09

Martha J. Fisher vs. Charles r. Mans
field 81 al and the unknown heirs OF
Charles Mansfield.
In the Circuit Court Of Marion County,
I'm the state OF Indiana.
Complaint to forcclose street improve
ment lien.
BE u known, That on the 26th day Of
NoNember, 1882, the above-uHmed plain
tin, by Frank McCray. attorney. filed in
the Office Of the clerk Of the Circuit court
OF Marion county. IN the state 81 Indiana,
defendants and the said plaintiff having
also filed In said clerks Office the affidavit
OF a competent person. showing that said
following heirs OF Charles r.. Mansfield:
Robert $. Mansfield and Dina Mansfield,
Abigail Hines John Hines, her husband;
band; George T. Mansfield and Mary J..
Mansfield, his wife; Charles ". Mans
fed and Cordelia Mansfield his wife;
Sarah Mansfield { unmarrieil. John r.
Mansheid unmarried. Hannah J.
Ross and William J. Ross. her husband;
field his wife: Eleanor walburn ana Rob
ert Walburn, her husband; Lucy jackson
ana solomon IL Jackson. her husband;
Ihomas J; Mansfield UNMARRIED, Henry
y Mansfield unmarried. Hannah J. Puck
EFT, Caleba g. Pickett, her husband: Mary
L. keger and William Keger her husband;
Alonzo Mansfield and Ida Mansfield his
VIE; Elizabeth Shaw. James Shaw her
husband; John r. Mansfield and Sarah
and oro Mansfield. his wife: Hannah AZ
ger and Samuel Alger her husband. and
are not residents OF the state OF indiana
and whereas said plaintiff having by en-
dorsement on said complaint required said
defendant 70 appear In said court and an
June. 1926.
Now, Therefore, BY order Of said court,
hereby notifed OF The aims ana pendency
OF said complaint against them, and that
unless they appear and answer or demur
thereto. at the calling OF said cause on the
3oth day. OF June. 1894 the same being the
4Sth judicial day OF a term OF said court.
% be begun and held az the court house
in the city OF Indianapolis. on the LIST
the matters and things therein contained
and alleged, VIII be heard and determined
IN their absence. JOHN r. WILSON,
Frank Mccray Attorney FOR Plaintia,
STATE OF INDIANA. MARION coUN-
In the superior Court OF Marion County.
IN the state OF Indiana.
Christian y. Kruse vs. Mary Howard
Francis. n; Howard e al 40.
BE Il known, that on the 18th day OF
April 1894. the above named plaintiff, by
bis Of sSs snS d eoart 9 S a t6s
County, IN the State OF Indiana, his COM
plant against the above named defendants,
and the said plaintiff having also flee In
said Clerks office the affidavit OF a cons
petent person, showing that said defend
ants, Mary Howard, Francis M. Howard.
unknown heirs OF John G. NansicklC de-
ceasec are not residents OF the state of
Indiana, and that said action is 20 quiet
title 20 real estate. and that said defend
ants are necessary parties thereto, ana
whereas said plaintiff having by indorse-
ment on sale complaint required said de-
PENDANTS 90 appear I'm said court ano an
swer or demur thereto, on the 18th day OF
June. 1894
Now, therefore, by order Of said court
said defendants last above nance are
hereby notified OF the filing and tendency
OF said complaint against them. and that
unless they appear and answer or demur
thereto. at the calling OF sale cause on the
18Th day OF June, 1894 the same being tho
i3th judicial day OF term OF said court.
70 be begun and held at the Court House
IN the City OF Indianapolis. on the frs-
Monday in June, 1924, said complaint ano
the matters and things therein contained
and alleged. viii be heard and determined
IN their absence.
JOHN r. WILSON, Clerk.
Morrow & Mckee Attorneys for Plalnun.