The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1894-02-15

.,..r. lawyer Thinks

.,tnehf LAVE
ut f, :, sss Water
y 81. ..,,' msnnsr in which i,., NV
ia 2. s+imbiy b ne le.s ,,1or, " IN.
ssg ,l.s a Mississippi Almost u''
Z. correspondent ca'isa 80 ~ =,
81 ~ S,sl Tits nernlns ~" .,,,ts.t
|5n'l " t.rlA say ~ 'i'0
(, osdsial Information On sns
AZ no msst / knowi ana an !
lne x. picayune. ] am not
y snsnk q ne ae ~, s,,,i,, 40
Ky, I shsl hasF heen tnay ON
IN KY. KY J. he whole afioir ,,
~ Wy sssssFsl johnston was asked
nwre s s,ai,s 81 he case. when he
W. ~, w eith very great interest s'
aM ., Y he win Pafyis ana - ae-
'le ~. 4 ~ the plcayrne Of Thurs
|'slg y ,,,i.nt II IL certainly unpge-
II q. M IN. IN ~ the TACT of the dis
|Li.l " ' X pprs4s on the scaf.o,d
~ 'll' t',4ss Newman rhornhi.l and
-'llAs q, eiher persons IN the con-
n e ''s ,.,,,rssr Rncsley ! am not
III y g gsy mai .he action Of the
Nsree. was not discreet
Y. rnisf al the circumstance
M. W. 4 would seem that the ends
81. INA NJ bnst attained by %
81 .',sl,s N purvls for such time
X " $3.50 1880 III the canHniracy OF
NJ implicated by him can pc es-
X 4 this feature Of the case
~ *, y sherln Magec fronn any
~ s.as h.s oiacisl action. il this
% M basis Of his action Ia
"a IA axscvfiUn al Rnrvis. Pur-
q mater stanis now, can not, Of
x, eTses,ea. Until he Is reean-
NJ court. This phase IT the
n eslsd t. the attention Of
out 81 me on next M5ndup
~ suoh action as the court
t,nsr 10 take IN the premises,
Y ~ ~ 10 express any opinion as
y '', \, a innocence Of Phyis, except
IS, n ma mest fair and im-
x, rs 81 al honest and Intelligent
I, r,fjoa county The whole law Of
4 " Ks ssvsh with the utmost fAlr-
= ,sssc,a.ss by 1udgs Terrlll, who
4 no circuit court.
w, III mest careful examination
= <; K re soId BY the supreme conrt
N, s5sssl tho verdict Of the jury
|. a 81, mag 81 The court are all ar-
y. IA "a jadgmeut affirmed. After
s5ysfnos made thcrougn ex-
- a ne whole case and declined
/. ,;,..s executive cieneacy. know
4, K he lAc4 Of I've Ruryis case
+, 4 ~ ssea hy the record Speaking
81 8 was upqnesii0nab.y proper
4. s.l There was the testimony
y 3, alinAss who Identified him AZ
4, IS s,s kiled Buckley, besides cir.
|.lss.t q q seriously eliminating
~, .ss.st him corrohoratipg the
~ 4 Als witness. Puryis was a
4 Il V organ .zAt.o1 tltlt6wn as
~ eedaiy Augmentation
4 <. y ritdteG larfeiy TO lawiess-
.4a me 10 the injury OF The
y, ~ STATE abroad ifortun-
sl1lEations have been thor
y. i.2 By the pro secuflon and
ety OF the offenders, ana
4 b II ea bal there is remnant
1alflte at present as an ar
! game thst Ar Neville.
fliFs attorney for fhe Sec
take the proper Steps |
s ~ z sfrlspirators OF Ruryls 50 |
vi iser Watkins OF Marion county
RaFyls, was Interviewed to-
lf', ssksd what steps he would
i pms eonn 81, air. Watkins
Ven me matter IS brought be-
Fl ~ s4ias ! Nh be able 70 saess
FteA tried Pufv.s d.G not Intend !
Feifh savoived a death penalty |
I't1aTy. a penalty for life lm- (
Fas iHtendei
y YOU th.uk Of the failure OF |
% hung PIrv.a?n
q acsed "a perfect good faith. |
: 1lsi Il execute the order ~ |
sE ts was perhaps sa greatly (
e the unforeseen accident as
q you think Of Purvls affldavit /
q qtlihis ~ Tie matter Of the !
q aprler3r
& p lhlosmstion on that subject /