Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1894-07-27

tors declare thht tnAt Ttsut NpuiN
not follow the adoption OF my motion.
ought TO know. asserted upon this noor
In unqualified terms that to adopt the
motion would defeat, that IT would
prevent the bill from going 10 confer
ence. The distinguished senator from
Ohio (Afr- Brioe) has made 10 me the
statement The distinguished Junior
senator from New Jersey Ont. SMITH
made to me similar declaration. That
the testimony is complete and the
country Will accept II as provlng the
fact. But Il II evident IN the honest
Judgment Of soma, the claim OF special
duty In the protection OF the industry
OF sugar refining Is so over-powerinB az
10 demand their resistance Of bill
without IL, however much TO me and
to others who think as / do that cons
summation Is devoutly wished. This
presents the question whether u 10
better that the bill should fail than
this thing should be done. There may
be, perchnnce worse things than the
Temporary defeat Of "a righteous cause.
even with the SUFFERING that may at-
tend H. The events which would en-
sue upon the failure OF the bill would
be temporary, although severe. You
know, as ! have already pointed out,
they would probably be 30 severe aH
that they could not be lightly passed
by. The american PH"Pit hetN "i ~,
tried In such "A contingency. II ~ but
n few years since when the Demu-
cratic party MAS apparently hseut. y,
power under brave leadership walled
in mere devotion to principle directly
TO political defeat,
"The lamp which led them was not
lost In the obscurlty and gloom or me
dark valley through Whleh Vhey paHseu.
II soon rose. and II illuminat,3 to-day
ths ,,sr,y citadel OF itartv itself, II
we are 10 be again deieNeeu ~, 9uso
ti1n To pfinc'pi" wy n9s Hs".
the people of the united sistea' ~; ~
there hre worse tnlhks u'1h l"llutN.
There vs. me decay OF Nlrlllfy 1U'vt,h
trce men Tar worse hNh h!tlp'u
feat. BUT there are some ',illba 70
comfort US, 70 ohocr we hopu n""t wy
OF this conference whlen VIII rheuy
there VIII come measure nlPIVsI,u
far beyond lhat whieh mas ailSu1g
passed inc henhte' iulp tlnl "gg. ~
the chuIhctei OF iHe tNhl''VNn' nv
~ also mueh oeultoIt ~ ~ tHhSSm
IN the trcoEhl1eu tuihleI ~ Nhy p1uy
WIN Whloh we wv uyalltE' luz '.'
drelhrud III IN ui'iital"Neap'u 10,
the strength ana inc ehthuhi"AHl Oh
its pohNlguohh' -,
Mr. was pioceeueu 10 teup liuln
me record ut thest pIocoeulnBl WIN WIZ,
the conference report was mace 10 lhat
b9aY' anu g, continued. ,.u... .,,, ooh,
lyl;l IA va, wv ,,,''i',,
w uPpL''u W ~ -, ~. '.i,.,,,,,,,,
VI I'M ,,'i,,1,, ,,,,tt n'., ,n
W VIZ g,s3,,,I tg,,.t
u ", uimi, ~ w. eVno o,d ~. the efr.e, ne
w., w. ~ ,,,,,,,,,, ba,e ,nnG. Nov sir
NAVEL Ia, t,sss gensldSrntinps and adj
,no,o t.Sah,gc NOV Nave 'rovrinod do
MY No. ttst,,,,,,,isi,nd c'1
I luuSi's ~, ina giSo ar no houae who
hnVe neon Win me without disscnt.
an obliged Ia rpeopnizg my duty to
he dlffrf,nl from what Il appeared
TO me To IN, when made the motion
which iipu upun the table of the senate.
Begldog. sir. I am a strict party mum,
and / am 40 especially In the proaccu-
tidn of measures Of party principle
for the reason that I know that only by
personal submission 60 the VIII of the
majority especially Ia matters Of
method nnd procedure, can the result
we dtsir- he achieved ltecognl4tug
that aud intending to make no half
Sehttcd acknowledgements when my
duty ia clear ! shall vot" io send this
biil TO confcrenec IN necordnnoe with
my Democratic brethren, ana l ASK the
leave of the senate IN order 70 carry
mat purpose INTO eject, to withdraw
me motion which ! made on FRIDAY
last
Mr. stewart topr OF Nevada, began
hpeeeh on mo respective pferoBnuVes
ol VohkFt rs "uu the executive ny
lephren uhat inc oondltlnh Wvro sueh
lllNN "a Nl'lhptl uA NoNblNhN must ohtN