New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1894-08-27

MORE PUBLIC DECoRuM.
Fifteen hundred persons braved the mosquitoes ~
Prohibition Park. 8 L. yesterday afternoon 10 near
Dr. McGlynns discourse on "A Model Common
wealth." Preceding his regular address ne maos
by request, a speech on Monsignor Satoliis con'
irmation OF Bishop Watterson's famous ORDER Az
the meeting at the park week ago the question
was asked II the Importance and seriousness OF the
Ab.egate's utterances against the saloons were
not over-estmated. and IL was also asked IL Single
representative Catholic could be named who was
opposed to the saloon" In introducing DR.. Nc
Glynn, DR.. Funk read the utterances OF Archbishop
Ireland Bishop Michaud. OF Vermont; Bishop Mess
ner, Of Wisconsin and Bishop McGolrick. OF Michi.
gan indorslng Monsignor Satollis position. Dr.
Funk said the answer to these questions and many
others had been turned to DR.. McGlynn
Father McGynn said there was danger OF magni-
fy.ng Monsignor Satoliis letter beyond the nten-
ton OF the writer 1t was not decree. Monsgnor
satoli was an Apostolic Delegate. He was not
here 10 make laws. The laws were made BY Ma
tional councils OF bishops and clergyren OF the
Second Order. which were revised at Rome he
was here in a judicial rather than In an adj
ministratiye capacity. The law had already Dceh
promulgated denying to iquor-sellers and manu-
facturers of liquor the right to hold ofnces IN those
societies which recognized as churcn societes'
and which met in the church building ITSELF or
some building belonging to the parish p''"op
Watterson, In his order applying TO MS diocese,
furtnPr
manufacturers should not be received TO the ho'S
communion in the church. unless they 30 con"
Quoted themselves as TO show that they "e0
practical Christians and worthy OF the sacla".".
The appeal was that the Bishop OF Columbus mad
transcribed his authority Monsignor Satoi prop
ery decided that the Bishop had the right to isses
such orders as would conserve the good morals
md reputation Of the Church. The order was an
important one and far reaching In It's erect ~
was more remarkable because honsignor sato'h
came from a wine-growng and wine-dr'hhins
coun,rv Monsgnor Sato hardly meant anu
BISHOP watterson hardly meant that " was ,s IN
to drink intoxicating liquors or 10 sen 'ne"'' Hwy
had not gone 80 far as That ...a,.
IT was fortunately fact that there was rap'uy
growing publ, feeling against me liquor pusnnss
Every one would recognize tnst u .ne aa, vhs
same condition. would he found TO exist In others
The letter plainly intimated that eacn pisnop ~
p'.hon Watterson and MonsIgnor Satolll should %
anneaied 10 for a reversal OF that order ne woIo
I've the same answer. II would have an enect M ~
couraging the Catholic people and cergy 10 ptar
sellers 70 conduct their business WIN srsa.,r pgne
decorum When they unders.o2d mat 1,sng IN ihs
frame they would be restrained from seinns 40, 20
Youths from making drunknrds and from ano, ,
70 people Sunday place Oh t s ssci In thIs
country where he said, the people %e n.5 ,hst "a
excosscs He thought II would not be dsns, ina ~
make men sohe, and te%Br rissn ministers should
'" Dr. McGyn1 then turned to "A Model Common:
ne was not going tell where on this earth the
model common wealth would be found.
In effect DIR. McGynn said that he deal govern:
were strictly obeyed. He then gave his idea OF what
a perfect government should be. The Single Tax
theory was the basis OF the argument