The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1894-04-22
LEGAL NDTlGES.

IN THE. DISTRICT COURT IN AND
Tor toi the Third Judicial district OF Utah
Coltrin and ]. H Grant, as administrators
of the estate of Ether Coltrin, deceased
plaintiffs, VS.. Estelle Veatch. Carlton w.
SON, Aaron Keyser, H. ?. Mason. i r. B.
Winters, and the Salt Lake Hardware
company, a corporation, Joseph C. Arm
Slrong, W llllam b Crutcher. and y. a.
IBrlm, Utah National Bank, Bank of Phil
Ups Elmer 3. Jones and Albert T.
schroeder, partners doing business as
Jones Schroeder, defepdants.-Suul-
The people of the territory of Utah send
greeunS 10 Estelle Veatch, Carlton w.
Veatch, w. Il. Fairchild. James Thomp-
winters, and the Salt Lake Hardware
company, corporation, Joseph G. Arm
strong William p. Crutcher. and y. a.
phillips, Elmer B. Jones and Albert 4.
Schroeder, partners doing business as
Je Y d schroeder, defendants.
gu are hereby required TO appear in an
action brought against you by the above
named plaintiffs in the district court of
the Third judicial district oil the territory
Med therein within ten days Exclusive OF
the day of service) after the service on
you OF this summons17if served within this
but in this district, within twenty dag:
otherwise within forty days-or Judgment
by default Will be taken against YOU ac-
coTrd 6 to the prayer of said complaint.
me said action is brought to have judg-
ment against the defendants Veatch
Neateh, Fairchild and Thompson, on two
causes OF action as follows: First, in the
sum OF $500, with interest at i0SI per
annum until Dec. %. 1891, and from Dec.
y, 1851 till paid at 1870 per month and on
500 from July q, 1891 at 11b% per month,
for 500 attorneys fee, and costs Of sllt:
alleged TO be due on a certain promissory
note executed by defendants Veatch
Neatch and Fairchild to one l. G. Cross,
I'll m
$3.50, with interest till maturity at i0g,
per annum, and after maturity on alI de-
fi I payments at I1a90 Per. month; same
being due and wholly unpaid second in
the sum of S140 with interest at ~ par
month after maturity till paid, and for
SoO attorneys fees; alleged to be due on a
certain promfsSory note, executed bv de-
tenqants Neatch, Veatch and Fairchiid, to
said Crossman, July % 1851 with int ares1
after maturity at go per month, due rive
months after date, for $40. same hajre
due and wholly unpaid; both said notes
being secured by mortgages on ssnoe
property which is hereinafter described.
executed by defendants, Veatch to said
Crossman; said notes and mortgages hay-
ing been duly. assigned to plaintiffs. who
are now the owners thereof; to
have said mortgages foreclosed, and
piled in payment of costs IF
suit and amounts due on said two
causes OF action; that interests of other
to those of plaintihs-and for other relief:
said premises are described as blocks .
and II, and the east one-half of block g.
county, Utah.
and you are hereby notified that if Won
fail to appear and answer the said com
plant as above required, the said plaintiff
Will apply to the court for the relief de-
manded therein.
Witness. the Hon; Samuel A Mer-
trict court of the Third Judicial
(Seal0 district, in and for the territory of
Utah, this 18th day Of February in |
eight hundred and ninety-four
DAVID c. DUNBAR,
by GEO- y. LOOMlS, Clerk.
Deputy Clerk.
Young, Young 81 Moyle, attorneys for !
plaintiff