The Coconino weekly sun., 1894-03-08
cour. calenaar, March rerm, 1soa.
CRIMINAL CASES.

Court Calendar, March Term, l S0A
 CRIMINAL CASES.
 3s. Territory of Arizona vs. Danie Ward--appealed from justices court on bail-H. Z. Zuck, attorney for plain tiff; .Iones & Jones. attorneys for de fendaIat.
 Fl. Territory of Arizona vs Eli! Van Vleit--assault with intent to com init murder, On bail-H. /. Buck, at tornev for plaintiff; Jones < Jones, at torncys for defendant.
 76. Territory of Arizona vs. Ed. Roberts. illegal branding, recogni- "a lce.-H. z. Buck, attorney for plain tiff; H. D. Ross, attorney for defendant.
 77. Territory of Arizona vs. Will fam Hoden-perjury, ou bail-H. z. Zuck, attorney for plaintiff; Geo. Ref mensnyder and Jones X Jones, attor- neys for defendant.
 81. Territory of Arizona vs. Marce- limo Delgado-forgery, on bail-H. z. Zuck, attorney forplaintiff; H. D. Ross, attorney for defendant. SI. Territory of Arizona vs. Hugh Anderson grand larceny, on bail-H z. Zuck, attorney for plaintiff; E. J. Babbitt, attorney for defendant.
 S5. Territory of Arizona vs. John cClallan-appealed from justices court, on bail-H z. Buck, attorney for p laintiff.
 CIVIL CASES.
 48- John Bishop vs. E. B. Perrin remi ,titur-Norris & Ellinwood, Hern- don S Hawkins, attorneys for plaintiff; Bald win & Johnson, and Stewart & Doe, attorneys for defendant.
 ST. F. w. Volz vs. Perry Potter attac hment--H. D. Ross, attorney for plain tiff; Norris & Ellinwood, attor- neys for defendant.
 10a. E. c. Dickinson vs. A. X P. R. F. Co.--damages-J. J. c. Herndon and I. D. Ross, attorneys for plaintiff; c. N. Sterry and Stewart & Doe, attor- neys for defendant.
 1C5. A. T. Cornish, ct al., vs. A. & P. R. R. Co. -damages-H. D. Ross, E. J. Babbitt and John W. Ross, attor- neys for plaintiffs; c. N. Sterry and Stewart X Doe. attorneys for defendant.
 I06. E. M. Clark, ct al., vs. A. & P. R. l.. Co.-damages-H. D. Ross, k. J. Babbitt and John w. Ross, attorneys for plaintiffs; c. N. Sterry and Stewart X Doe, attorneys for defendant.
 10S. Vim. Roden, Sr., vs. A. & P. R. R. Co.,--appealed from justice's cour.-Jones & Jones, attorneys for plaintiff; c. N. Sterry and Stewart & Doe, attorneys for defendant.
 l09. Chas. H. Schulz vs. Herman Miller, ct al. -forcclosure-Stewart & Doe, attorneys for plaintiff; T. G. Nor ris, for defendant Norris.
 1l5. Frank L. Rogers, ct al., vs. Frank Murphy-injunction-H. Z. Buck and E. S. Clark, attorneys for plaintiffs, Herndon & Norris, attorneys for defendant.
 116. John R. Tabor vs. Max Salz- man ct al.,-damages-James al. H. Wright, attorney for plaintiff; Stewart & Doe, attorneys for defendants.
 122. Territory of Arizona. for the use and benefit of Coconino Co.,, vs. A. T. Cornish, ct al.-action on official bond-Stewart & Doe, and H. z. Zuck, attorneys for plaintiff.
 124. W. 5. Turner vs. Ella Turner -divorce-H. z. Buck and E. S. Clark, attorneys for plaintiff.
 129. J. F. Buchanan vs. w. J. -klostermeler-aPpeaied from justices c,,nrt--Stewart & Doe, attorneys for plaintiff; Geo. Reimensnyder, attorney for defendant.
 13i. Chas. Zeiger vs. J. B. Wood, ct al al-attachment-Stewart & Doe, attorneys for plaintiff.
 133. Riordan Mer. Co. vs. Harry -attachment-E. E. Ellinwood, attorney for plaintiff;
 134. John Copp vs. A. & P. R. R. Co.--damages-J. c. Herndon and H. D. Ross, attorneys for plaintiff.
 135. Martin Buggeln vs. A. & P. R. R. Co.--damages-J. c. Herndou and II. D. Ross, attorneys for plaintiff.
 136. Chris. Jantzen vs. Babbitt Bros.-appealed from justices court Jones & Jones, attorneys for plaintiff; E. J, Babbitt, Ross & Ross, attorneys for defendants.
 137. Susan B. Tabor vs. John K.