Pine Bluff daily graphic., 1894-09-15
HFRE'S. | HONDY DOI
.,..,elNF SUED FOR s5o,ooo DAM
 ACES
eI0ra Jenkins for Anenati"e Her HS.sDands Affections and for
 Slander
.aANo of THE PLAINTIFF BRINGS
 SUIT FOR DIVORCE

he nslallY qulel lieeie ..:ll in this county, is somewhat x tbroes of q sensation On the s,,.f Mrs. Flora Jenkins brought aaalsst Mir P. N. .Naugine. a ,ltlIy merchant of that town, for ,NNf siamages for aIienating the ssians of her husband, ] L. Jen- E aaa ior islander. The story of ssa and unfortunate affair can be told in the language of plain seomplaint, which is as follows: k leiierson Circuit Court Sep aIber lS94
 a Jenkins. Plaintiff,
 ys.
 lIIp N yaugine, Defendant.
 eoAlPLAINT AT LAW.
 Its plaIntiff, Flora Jenkins, says: 6t onp Joseph L. Jenkins, who is saed herein, is and at the time sInaiter mentioned WIS the hns- N d the plaintiff. That they k slaly married on the day of lss2 That soon after their EFiage and, especially, during the X 1S93 and ls94. while the said kius WIS living and ea-habiting lland Supporting the plafntiff in Ffiils 5efierson county. Arkansas, #hlla they were living together HpilY as man and wife, the defend EEhillip \. Yangine, well knowing Jenkins to be the husband of Hiafntiif and wrongfuIly con ElAg aia intending 10 iniurp the AallHand to deprive her of her Bands lJ. L. Jenkins society, HDFa md aid, maliciouslY alien and destroyed ,he affections of RI |. Jenkins, and bY undue in- saee antl persuasion enticed said Jenkins away from the plain .aa her then residence and in- EEaesIl said j. L. Jenkins to totally faaon the said plaintiH and to re- psupport or claim her as his Hlat tlie defendant yaugine, was, the maternal uncle of plain Aashand, who is, and wns for Eeals past clerk in defendant s F.Ao'lse at Sherrill. That de- aal oh account of his great llf snd kin to said ]. L. Jenkins aelAg his employer, and being ellF Superior to t6e said I l.. as had and has great influence m Plaintiff alleges that soon Aef nlarriage with the defend aephew. defendant took great
 e plaintiff beeanse, as she Eg''ael and believes, she was not soalah0te0nscientiouslv soala become lseft to the Catholic religion. 4Rereupon the defendant ma ss'a Set about to alienate and tne affections of said !. l.. s'sior this plaintiff by making F'spi disparaging and deroga- 'snafks about this plaintiff to sFR'eW, J. l.. Jenkins, telling
 uld not get rid of her he alsown and disinherit and dis
 'sla Fhatupononeoeca
 'so4' this observation-disclosures
 ,a'sely' in the presence of said
 NNlns and divers persons,
 'ernlng this plaintiff these
 9us words, That Dr. McIn- sleeping with her every hereby meaning that the
 "a committed the crime of With Dr. Mcintosh, mali
 'eldlng thereby to islander
 '''l and force her said hus-
 jenkins, to forever aban- sereoy the affections which
 l. Jenkins heretofore had E.,,.s '"lntlff was alienated and Esss ana that the plaintiff was Y t4e comfort, society. aid
 0paliee which he otherwise Nassng, " nad from the said ]. l.. >I8Iba'a has suffered great dis
 eofS5O,OOO. ' s'''
 1s', s"'s @I plaintiff prays judgment 0aiiages and costs.
 0and of Mrs. Flora Jen- |los t. |. Jenkins, nephew and 'ant of Mr. P. N. vaugine
 the chancery court of this
 tiona duplication for divorce.
 iapa ,S 'll which ease are being
 "S ut the office of Austin X E nhlps will contest the. suit
 sfrenuously denies that
 f been unfaithful in any
 hn aer husband. She alleges
 Ausoand left hsc this sum.
 VI = l,sa