Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1894-02-18
T. ], WOODS TRIAL.
CHNEIDER TEsTIFIEs REGARD
ING THE NOTES.
Evidence showed that the Directors
Owed the Bank $3.50, 900,
when Wood Reported
to the Contrary.


Special Dispatch.
Dallas. Tex. Fob. 10.-The Wood
trial was on all day in the Federal court.
Il. O. Schneider, the book-kceper of the
Ninth national. was on the stand today.
The matter of notes was taken up. The
witness said that note for $4,000 was
made January s, 1880, due June
S, 1891. with no indorsers or
collateral. This note was rediscouni-
ed at the Park national bank. New 1ork,
according to the books. on January -
1891. with S3l,3sT 81 charged T.. !
Woods. Jr. s, individual 9ecouni oil me
same date shows SOl2 81 and The two
latter make $4,000 The account OF
Mrs. l.. l.. Woods shows that S2J,OVO
was placed 30 her account ON the same
date The meaning OF these entrees u
| fhat on january s. 1871. this note was
/ made and discounted for money Dor
I rowcd from the Ninth NATIONAL lahk OF
1 DALLAS. Said note was rcdlScountel Tor
money borrowed from the Park national
4 hank by the Ninth national bank OF Dal.
M rl1e charge S2i.3Sf 81 ON Janunry
III 1891. to the Park national bank
marked discount signifies that IL is Tue
net proceeds Of the S25.OOOs less rates;
Mrs. l.. /" Woods account was e'os'"
when the bank suspended,
Nntc 10. co. for $1,000 was dated
Innn 10 1891, and discounted the same
dnte. This note was made Out ny i.
/ Wood Jr.. in favor of the Ninth
national bank Of Dallas, payable on de-
mand, with Il per cent interest rom
maturity It had no On eoA9ter Wal a,t"' Ir
f,diyid,,ol account was credited with
ss6o6 On May g, 1871. three notes Tor
Sio OOo ench were made by Wool IN
fayor of the Ninth national bank Oh D2i-
lac They had no security or couaterui.
On NAV o. 1871. Mr. Wool : aec9li y.
NJ ortriee arc 100000. Sl1.212.T1 ana
"a Srbe loan aud discount entries on
SISy O iSgi. were charged WIN me
a,rea mites aud the deposit slip OF me
sane date was made M OF thc tnle'
NOTES. The meaning Of inc ~. aDo hre et'
tries is that Mr. Woods gol w , pe'''"'
Of $4,000 on the notes 10 sne Wrrsh,lr,
, Continuing IN reply 10 Mt Ainrs M !
.s,icns the witness said; tiihl
w, S,a Mood In the firm OF Mool q
vri,;otns was L. j. Wood, lr' know
. II Tones Of II, Jones y 90. ] s,s.u,sssspp
say who the COMPANY ,.,,s,,sssc Tam am
/. -Ge.A.srsAe> 'Sl the business m IN
- Srsynce Of Mr.. Jones On April y, ~ ~.
= II. Jones & Coz aceonnt Nha ~,
+ ,,.,h S13loSi So for wihith amount not
! VA Noon made out to II. Jones y Co
!. INV ~ n. j. Wood Jr. Yes, ! have see
}. IL Wood in possession Of teiegram
y addressed to II. ZONES x Co. ms I'M mr.
wv in the cotton business and did mo, mos
~ their financial business with TIE NM NM
national bank. ON September 10; ~
tyo notes for $4,000 were creilted !
~ ii Zones & Co. The condiuon OF w
y 49, a., areonnt with The bank at the tim
y I, ~ ~ no Suspension was that the firm owe
al the bank SO9.3l -.
II. AZ Inc afternoon session evidence va
,e introduced to show that at Q tine whe
H. Prt.sident Wood had reported 20 the col
trarv 10 the comptroller of enTenq'
tAl directors Of the bank owed the Il
stitu,ion SS39o00