San Antonio daily light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1886-1907, 1894-01-10

A deed OF assignment was hled
in the county clerks office this
morning, whereby H. Morris and
Sol. A. Norris, composing the firm
of HI. Norris & Bro, the well-known
gents furnishers, at Nos. 305 and
3054 West Commerce street, name
A. M. Cohen the assignee of all
their propesty. The conveyance is
intended as a mortgage and trust,
to secure the payment of the fol-
lowing debts owing by the firm:
One note of $3.50, with 1919 in
terest, payable to the order of Bet
tie Morris, (now Fuerst), Adelaine
Norris, (now KantrowitZ), and
Hannah Morris.
Balance due on note given by
H. Morris & Bro, to S. NJ. Fuerst
for $1,000 on which the balance
now due is $3.50. John R. Shook,
$351 Joseph Morris, $1S5.50; Her
man Wagenfuehr, $45; John Con-
der,$60; Rudolph Kuhlmann, $40;
Gus Gerjes, $50; Express Publish
ing company, 5000; San Antonio
Gas company, $5l.70; San Antonio
Light Publishing company, 1923;
Freie Presse fuer Texas, $500;
M. Half g. Bro, $34.05; ID. & A.
Oppenheimer, $l5; Frank Bros, SO;
Lewis T. Goodrich, $l5; Brad
streets Mercantile agency $25;
Henry and Virginia A. Gillum, J.
n. Groesbeck, agent, balance due
on vennor's lien note, $96.41; Geo.
Bernhard & Son, $174.S9; T. Grief &
Bro, $2,333.25; Schloss Bros. & Co.,
$2,47l.25; Marx & Haas, Jeans
Clothing company, $2S9.7S; Meyer,
Wechsler q Lanfer, $S22.SS ;Fleisch-
er Bros, $1,69l.25; Heller, Rosen-
berg, Rothschild & Lang, 4l175;
Charles Levy & Sons, $224.05 Stern
& Co., $66l.93; J. B. Stetson Com
pany, $247; Hutchinson, Pierce &
CO., $l47 Elias Bros. & Co., $l60.50;
Loeb & Waldheimer, $5S075; II. c..
Cohn & Co., $159.50; Bonner Bros,
S542; Hammerslough Bros, 1856.
Total, $15,7S2.19.
FORTY-FIFTH DISTRICT COURT.
The following cases were dispos-
ed of in the FOrty-fifth District
court this morning:
H. p. Drought VS.. A. Nicholson,
to try title and for damages and
sequestration; judgment for plain
tiff.
II. T. Herndon VS.. J. T. Rodri-
guez, on promissOry note; judg-
ment by default.
j. H. McLeary VS.. Chas. E. Hicks,
on prOmissory note; judgment by
default.
Eugene Davis VS.. Frank Bros,
appeal from Justice court; judg-
ment for plaintiff.
John w. Dever VS.. the San An
tonic and Arkansas Pass Railway
company, damages; dismissed by
agreement at defendants cost.
E. ID. Thomas VS.. J. NJ. Hoops,
trustee II. w. Davis, on note and
to foreclose deed Of trust; dismiss
ed for want of prosecution.
The City of San Antonio VS.. Ro-
bert Gale, debt and foreclosure of
lien; dismissed at plaintiffs cost.
J. S. Fry VS.. w. E. Roach, APP
peal from Justice court; dismissed
and plaintiff to pay cost in Dis
trict court and defendant to pay
cost in lower court.
A motion for new trial in suit
of August j. Zainontz ct al. VS..
Goldfrank, Frank & Co., ct al,
transferred from the Thirty
seventh District court, was over
ruled and plaintiff gave notice Of
appeal.
Judgment was rendered for de- !
PENDANT in this court yesterday
afternoon in suit of Enfracio and |
Francisco Trevins against Andres
de la Cara, appeal from county
court of BeXar county.
In a suit of the Warner Elevator
Manufacturing company against |
Sam Maverick ct al, judgment was
rendered for plaintiffs against Sam
Maverick and judgment for the
Pond Engineering company and
Shafer & Braden against Sam Nav
erick, with foreclosure of lien. No
tice of appeal was given by the
Warner Elevator company and by |
the defendants Sam Maverick and |
Reagan Houston.
COURT NEWS NOTES.
An appeal case from Justice |
Adams court was filed in the For
ty-fifth District court yesterday af-
ternoon in which Hunt and Gray |
are suing the Galveston, Harris
burg and San Antonio Railway |
company for damages in the sum