New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1894-02-28
MORGAN'S REPORT.
Conclusions of the Foreign Relations
Committee, Investigating Ha-
Waiian Matters
Laid Before the Senate-Republican
Members Present a Supple
mental Report,
While Four Democrats Dissent From
PartSOf It-AnnexatiOn Indirectly
Favored.

WASHINGTON, Feb. Ex-senator Nor.
gan, chairman of the senate committee
on foreign relations, presented the re.
port of the investigation of that com
mittee, made under the following reso-
| luton:
"Resolved, That the committee on
foreign relations shall inquire and re-
| port, whether any, and if so, what
| irregularities have occurred in the dip
| lolnatic or other intercourse between
the United States and Hawaii in rela-
ton to the recent political revolution in
| Hawaii, and to this end said committee
is authorized to send for persons and
papers and to administer oaths to wit
| nesses."
The report prepared by Senator Nor
gan IS concurred in by Senators Sher-
man, Frye, Dolph and Davis, the Re-
publican members OF the committee,
who also make a supplemental report,
taking more positive grounds than the
Morgan report, while Senators Butler,
Turpie, Daniels and Gray Democrats)
submit minority report.
These reports, with the testimony
taken in the secret investigation make
bulky document and comprehensive
review OF the Hawaiian question made
after thorough investigation. Senator
Morgan, in his report says that the in
qulry related, first, to the conduct of
the government, as shown in it's official
acts, and correspondence; and second,
to the conduct Of the civil and military
officers of the government in the dis
charge OF their public duties and func-
lions. These are matters that do not
concern Hawaii at this time. He also
says that the -uture policy Of the gov
eminent as to annexation has been ex-
cluded from the consideration of the
committee, except where it is alluded to
as an incident to the investigation.
Lays Down a Proposition.
MIR. Morgan lays down the proposition
on the first page Of the report: GAS gov
eminent dealing with Hawaii and with
any form of government in that coun-
try, the United States can have no sep
aration or break in its line of policy
corresponding to any change in the in
cumbency of the Office of PRESIDENT It
is in all respects as much tie same gov
eminent in every right and responsible
ity as if it had been under the same
president during the entire period coy
cred by the recent revolution in Hawaii
and the succeeding events
The president however, has a right
to change his opinion, and a change of
policy on the part of one president from
that inaugurated by his predecessor
must be regarded
Simply as Change Of Mind
in the same person. A declaration
against monarchism in the islands fol-
lows next, the report saying hat we ex-
ercise at least moral suzerainty over
that country.
Hawaii" it says, ''is an American
state and is embraced in the American
commercial and military system. In
this attitude of the two governments,
Hawaii must be entitled to demand of
the United States all indulgent consider
alton, If not an active sympathy, while
she is endeavoring to accomplish what
every American state has achieved, the
release OF her people from the odious
anti-republican regime which denies to
the people tins right to govern them
selves, and subordinates them to the
supposed divine right of a monarch
whose title to such divinity originated
in the most slavlsh condition of pagan
barbarity.'
Landing of the Troops.
| Coming to the landing of the troops
from the United States steamship Bos-
ton, Mr.. Morgan details the facts of the
10 days cruise in which Minister Stevens
participated, and says that upon the
minister's return to the harbor, a condi-
ton of affairs existed in Honolulu
which led naturally te the apprehension
that violence or civil commotion would
ensue, in which the peace and security
| Of American citizens residing in that
city would be in peril, as had been done
on three or more separate occasions
J previously when changes occurred, OF
were about to occur, in the government
of Hawaii. Whatever we may conclude
were the real causes of the situation then
present in Honolulu, the fact is that
there was complete paralysis of execu.
tive government in Hawaii The action
of the queen in an effort to overturn the
constitution to which she had sworn
obedience and support, had been accept.
ed and treated by a large and powerful
body of the people as violation of he,
constitutional obligations, revolutionary
in it's character and purposes, and thai
it amounted to an act of abdication or
her part so far as her powers and the
rights of the people under the constitu
ton of 1887 were concerned. This state
of opinion and this condition of the OK
ecutive head of the Hawaiian govern
mept
Neutralized Its Power
to protect American citizens and othe,
foreigners in their treaty rights, and
also all their rights under the laws Of
Hawaii. There was not in Honolulu al
that time any efficient power through
which the rights Of American citizens
residing there could be protected il
accordance with local laws. It is evi
dent that the queens government at thai