Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1894-04-24
THE DISTRICT COURT,
Tvo Old Causes Again ThFsshed Be-
lOra The Judges To-day.
DISPUTE OVER SOME MONEY
rhorc are Three Local Firms Named
in Connection With It.
Probate.

pullness has reigned supfome around
all the courts today. In the Thlfd
ds,rict both judges were engaged the
whole morning with the hearing Of
-, cases the trial OF one Of which
,cyap yesterday morning, and the
p,hrr on Ftiday last.
JUDGE MERW1rs Division
BEFORE Cnief Justice Merritt aud
Jury the trial Of the SUIT brought by
q. T.. LooibOurow, a. administrator Of
the estate Of II. NJ. Halvorsen agalnlt
the Niagara Mining and Smelling
company was resumed. The parllcu.
lars we're reported Ia yesterdays
NEWS, the litigation arising out Of an
alleged contract for work done by the
dccedeut In the driving Of a tunnel
upOu tue Defendants miuins property
81 bingham.
The Jury this afternoon found a YER
die, iorthv plaintiff iof s3,O0.95 on the
fist cause q actiOuj Tor $500 On the
second; and for the defendant on the
thifd.
JUDGE BARrCus sANctUM.
The case oi Joseph Holt Va Charles +.
Pearson, suit Arising cut OF real
estate matter at Bountiful, was again
taken up by Judge Bauch aud a jury.
This afternoon the jury found ZOE The
Nfi az
uayP stBy was granted.
rnE TwO sIDgs On ~
The case Of Charles Nader VI Taylor
Romncy, Armstrong 90. was the HuXt
for trial, Thomas and Byurs appealing
i1r the plaintiff AMI sutherland IS
Hnwut Tor the defendants.
fhu complainant alleges that In
November, 1891, Parker and DtIuc,
through their agent, palu into the
hands 0f ouu VIM. II. DJnnoll tho gum
vi $685., with Instructions that the same
io tufuud over 10 plaintiff; the same 90
10 Mason q 90. Ia thu sum %. slUS, aud
ABu as 10 MOrni0n, Merrill * g.. Tor
sos. DOnnoil, icing tue ugCut % these
ffma, instead Oi ubgyiug the directions
o his pfinCipals, through iuadvcrtBncU
paid 10 the defendants Taylor Rom.
ury Armstrong Co., greater part Ui
the money namoii amounting 10 about
1910, Dsmaud was MAZE, bu. lh9 d..
f1udhuts refused 10 refund it. IL De-
then ALLEGED that the defendants, by
meanB Of false ani fraudulent slate.
meuts, induced DInucil 10 pay this
money, aud executed a bond agreeing
10 hold him harmless Ia thu matter
Wherefore plaiutin praya Judgment
against the defendants luf 500, with
Interest vi b per cent rom Nov. ilh.
La their answer The defendants deny
the whole Of the allegations set ioTtn
by the plainuT Ru aver that the
monoy was paid By Donneil, as agent
Of tho Lumbrrmon's Exchange, 10
them, 10 apply on an Indebtedness VI
thv Exchange % defendants. ThUy
.urther deny that D0nuoll was the
agent Of either o. tho three firms
named above, that the payment was
made by him 20 defendants Ia putsI.
ance VI his duties ~ agent VI tho Lum'
befmen's Exchange, aud through no
mistake or iua1vcftyucc.
A DIVORCE.
Judge Bat,ch this afternoon granted
n divorce 10 Clara MCphclfts from her
husband, aFtanciu fhUtttHi ON the
ground Of failure 10 provide, granted
her $1,000 almOny, the outt1dy " the
minor child, anu attorneys ices, Pow
tfs and Strauu wCtp Mrs. Phetfysi
attorneys. The case went by default
The parties formerly resided in rus,
cafuta, Nevada, where the defendant
was stock raiser aud ran "A stage
They have lived IA salt Lake City
about two years, tho husband being
between hity anu SIXTY yeas Of age
and the wife about forty.
A DAMAGE SUR.
The case Of Joseph KrAnlz Va tue II,
u. W. Railroad Go. WAS called ON it
Judge Merritps court about $3.50 thll
afternoon. tls M action Tor uamages,
tno total sum clAimoi being $4,000,
aud arises out Of the pIaiuiiu having
been, As aIlegod, assaulted by One oil
tho company'H employees aud iofOibly
elected from a train on which ho was a
luHseuuWF