Sullivan republican. [volume] (Laporte, Pa.) 1883-1896, 1894-09-28

o'Nhu Juiy no not dpIIoNe OF Salu
report.
In re: School House lot near
Nordmont, the Court appoint +. ii.
lngham, Mcclellan Phillips, viewers
to estimate the value of the land
upon which said School house is To-
Gated. The said viewers to meet
Oct. II, 1894, on the premises, and
10 days notice to be given to Mrs.
Wiener, the owner of the land.
In re: Specific performance of con-
tract between C. B. Miller and Chas.
Roof, and now Sept. 20, 1894.
Specific performance of contract
decreed, 10y the Court.
Sprague VS. Sprague and Belden VS.
Belden. The Sheriff directed to
make usual proclamation in divorce.
Samuel Cole ct al. VS. Towanda
Foundry Co. Rules in each case
granted to show cause, why Judge.
ment should not lie opened &c.
In re: Estate Of Edward Sharp,
decd, the Court direct an attach
ment to issue unless the Executor
files his account in 80 days. Com'th
vs. Morris Leverton, Peddling with
out license, tried at sept. Sess. 1898
recognizance of do(t. forfeited to be
respitel on his appearance at next
term. Com'th VS. Louis Itein, pedd
ling without a license, tried at Dec
Sess. 1898, sentenced TO pay fine of
$50 and costs OF prosecution and to
stand committed until sentence is
complied with. M. A. Sureman VS.
Thos Collins ct al. Judgement for
plaintiff in open Court for want of
an appearance. In re: Guardianship
of Hugh and Thomas OBrien. the
Court direct and appoint Mary Ann
O'Brien Guardian of said minors.
Bonds required $500. Nj. r. Herr
mann (usel VS. Daniel Gilbert ct al
2 cases. alias Sci Fa. ordered to
issue. e W. Engleman's Executor
VS. M. w. Reeser ct al. Judgement
for plaintiff in open Court, amount
TO be asceltaincd by the Proth'y.
Fred Utz VS. Beinlick, judgement
for plaintiff in open Court for want
of an appearance. Ransom Thrasher
VS. Earle's, Judgement for plaintiff
in open Court for want of a plea
and affidavit of defense amount to
he ascertained by the Piothonotary.
Pictio Santange and 46 others VS.
the w. " n. b r. Il. Co. The rules
granted in each of these cases to
show cause why plaintiffs shall not
give security for costs or suffer non
suit, ale made absolute in each case
and non suits entered by the Court.
Bill Gordon and 10 others VS. the
W. q n. B. Il. II. Co. same proceed
ings, same order, non suits in each
one, by the Court, j. q. Frost Sons
VS. Chas. Hugo and b. G. Stephen
son, rule to show cause why def'ts.
shall not bring their suit in eject
ment within 80 days, is made abso-
Lutte. by the Court. Towanda
Foundry Co. Samuel Cole ct al. q
cases) and Dugan & Farrell VS. Mar
garet Mccartney, w. j. Mccartney,
agent and W. j. Mccartney, and
now Sept. 81, 1894 the rules granted
in these cases shall be rcturnable at
Chambers of the President Judge at
Tunkhannock on Oct. 26, 1894 at
o'clock D. m. Dispositions on the
part of the plaintiffs in the rules to
be fled in the Prothonotary's office
at least 10 days before the return
day of the rnes.
TRIAL LIST.
Josiah Henbury VS. kurch & Co.
case tried verdict for defts.
Jackson vs Lambert continued
Williams VS. Dumond & Flaunigan
con. Eldred VS. Gilman q cases.
con. Robbins VS. McFarlane con. at
cos.s of delt. The Peuna. Co. for
lnsce. VS. Gilman con. Brown VS.
Trexler, Turrcll g. Co. con. Kneller
VS. CoIly twp. con. and ordered at
the head of the list for Dec. term.
Karns vs. Gaynor verdict for plaintiff
for Sl37.7S, Peterman VS. Gaynor,
verdict for plaintiff for $2l0.S5,
keeler vs. GaynCr verdict for plain
tiff for S202.7l, Ballard VS. Gayuor
verdict for plaintiff for $41S.65.
Botsford VS. Gaynor con. Campbell
& Son VS. Let's con. Farrell VS.
McMahon con. at costs of deit.
ARGUMENT LIST.
Starr VS. Starr rule for almony
In re: rule on overseers
of poor of Fox twp. argued and G.
A. Y. Haman VS. Wright judgt. set
aside. And now to wit Sept. 81, "a
at noon the several Courts of
Sullivan county adjourned.