The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1894-02-23
HEARD IN COURT TODAY.
Ills Goods and Chattels Were Thrown
into the Street-Criminal Arraign-
ments-D Docket for Feb. "a.

WuNm&o aFVtntt ftt - tsf- -
Before Judge Rogers today came mp the
case OF Ezra Humes against Fred r. Jencks
ct al. The parties reside in Cumberland
Humes became a tenant OF Jencks througn =
the mediation of an agent named
Julius w. Fritchile. He moved in ana
later wished that he had not done 40 Tor a
dispute arose about the contract. III enueu
in Jencks appearing at the house
and throwing into the streets ,he mousse
hold and other goods and chattels OF the
plaintiff. Many OF these were lost, says
Humes, and others damaged. In consld-
Grafton he asked the jury to award him
whatever damages they think are proper.
Criminals Arraigned.
Grace Delaury. indicted by the grand
Jury for maintaing low drinking
resort, pleaded not guilty and In default
OF 1900 was committed.
Charles McCarron pleaded guilty TO a
charge of breaking and entering and In
default OF bail was sent back.
Docket for February "a.
appellate Division.l
e63l. Margaret Tucker Edward d
Attorneys & Fitch for petitioner.
S702. Mehitable T. Hutchinson VS..
BENZ. G. Buckingham. Attorneys-W. H.
Perce for complainant. >,
1926. Lazarus Herschcovitz VS.. ii.
Prudential, alias. Attorneys. j.
Hahn for complainant, C.. j. Farnsworth
for respondent.
3562. Maria Grimes VS.. Rosay. Attor.
neys-G. j. West for complainant, &. T..
German and p. j. Quinn for respondent.
3699 Christian Riess ct ux. VS.. James
Everard. Attorneys. j. Hahn for com
plainant, w. F. Angel and +. Il. Carpen-
ter for respondent.
1856. Bessie Joslin VS.. VIM. III. Attor-
neys-Page Il Owen for petitioner.
4. Patrick Connolly app. VS.. Patrick
Connolly, ex. Attorneys-G. j. West for
complainant, p. III. Mulholland for re-
spondent.
1919. II. c. Curtis VS.. Charles B. Lewis.
Attorneys-E. c. Pierce for complainant,
Page & Owen for respondent.
1925. Alfred j. Kent VS.. James Me-
Enaney. Attorneys Page 4 Owen for
complainant, Il. c. Dubois for respondent
9293. Addie M. Degarmo VS.. William.
Attorneys Page a. Owen for petitioner,
Pegram & Cook for respondent.
95O3. Isabel T.. Potter VS.. Thomas w.
Attorneys III. G. Curtis for petitioner,
OsfieId & Bannigan for respondent.
9fa9. Eva f. Drake VS.. Warren NJ. At
torneys-Bassett x Mitchell for petit
tioner.
1868 r. II. i. Goddard ct al. VS.. City OF
Providence. Attorneys - j. Tillinghast
and Comstock & Gardner for complain
ant, City Solicitor for respondent.
Common Pleas Divisionl
4S67 John A. Cross vs.. Brown, Steese
& Clark. Attorneys. T. f. and w. II.
Tillinghast for plaintiff, Colwel & Bar
ring ct al for defendant.
$50. Universal Fashion Company VS..
Berry Bros. as. Attorneys-C. T.. Cham
plin for plaintiff, IL. w. Kimball for de-
fendant.
71O4. G. J. Cronin & Son VS.. Woon-
socket Rubber Co. Attorneys q. J. West
for plaintiff, J. & T. f. Tillinghast for de-
fcndant.
s15. Joseph III. Lynch VS.. Holmes Bros.
Attorneys III. A. McKenney for plain
tiff, r. w. Burbank for respondent.
675. Hardt Won Bermuth VS.. X. /. Cloth
Ing Co. Attorneys. ID. Thurston for
plaintiff, j. j. Hahn for defendant.
7165. Providence Coal Co. vs.. Coke
Bros. Attorneys-J., w. r. and T. f.
Tillinghast for plaintiff, j. M. Ripley for
defendant.
10. Moses w. Horton ct ux. vs.. Corneia
c. Horton. Attorneys--J., W. r.. and t. +.
Tillinghast for plaintiff; j. M. Ripley and
A. l.. Brown for defendant.
774. Globe Manufacturing Company vs.
Philip Fain. Attorneys-C. T.. Champlin
and j. Nj. Brennan for plaintiff; ID. III.
6heahan for defendant.
Rachel O'Neil VS.. Patrick Nc
Manus. Attorneys Page q Owen for
plaintiff.
500. Perkins Brothers VS.. Thomas =.
Barstow. Attorneys Page 4 Owen for
plaintiff, b. l.. Dennis for defendant.
s1s. Spaight vs.. Joseph Gilman & Son.
Attorneys. M. Brennan for plaintiff, Il.
r. Lee for defendant.
656. Mary Il. Hallett VS.. Henry A.
Atkins. Attorneys Page 4 Owen for
plaintiff, Bassett & Mitchell for defend
ant.
373. Burrows & Kenyon VS.. John II.
Smith. Attorneys-R. w. Burbank for
plaintiff, McGuinness q Doran for de-
feHdant.
81. VIM. VI. Draper vs.. James r.. Angel.
Attorneys. w. Hogan for plaintiff, j.
NJ. Brennan for defendant.
$50 Newport Co. Fall River Machine
Company VS.. Isaac q. White. Attorneys
William p. Sheffield, and William =.
RhefYeld In for ,NIafuttH nari,o palvar