The morning news. [volume] (Savannah, Ga.) 1887-1900, 1894-01-28
A PERMANENT RECEIVER.
c. T. Law to Take Charge Of Butler
& MOTTiSSey'S Assets.

Mr.. Hanley's Side of the Lloyd &
Adams Case Argued-Mrs. Walling
Wants Alimony and an Injunction
Restraining Her Husband From Sell
ing His Property-other Business
Transacted in the Superior Court
Yesterday.
The petition for receiver for the assets
and stock of Messrs Butler & Morrissey
was taken up in the superior court yes
terday, and after short discussion, TEN
porary Receiver John T. Roman was dis
missed, and G. Fraser Law was made
perma nent receiver.
The answer of the defendants was filed,
in which they made no objection to the
appointment of a receiver, and stated
they thought it necessary for the proper
collection of all the assets, and the
straigh tening out of the affairs of the
firm.
THE LLOYD 4 ADAMS CASE.
The case of the New York Glass Co. VS..
Lloyd & Adams was taken up before
Judge F'alligant in Efingham chambers,
held in the Savannah court room. The
question up under the case was the diff
ferences between the firm and Mr. An
drew Hanley, who purchased the stock
He claimed that he did not get all the in
ventory called for and has called on the
court through which the property was
sold to rectify his claim. The arguments
were concluded yesterday and time was
asked in which to file briefs in the case.
Judge Falligant will then take the matter
under Amusement.
WANTS ALIMoNY AND AN INJUNCTION
Florence A. Walling brought suit
against her husband, Henry d. Walling,
| in the superior court yesterday for alimony
and injunction restraining him from dis
posing of his property They were mar
ried in South Carolina in 1887, and moved
to Savannah about year and a half af-
forwards. He bought lot on Gwinnett
street for which he paid S445. Mrs. Wal
ling states that she kept boarders in order
to enable him to pay for the property,
and she declares that nearly all due on
both the house and lot has been paid
Jan. "a, just four days ago, Walling left
his wife, as she says, without any reason
| or provocation whatever, and left her I'M
| provided for. She states also that he
placed the property in the hands Of
Messrs. l. d. & II. d. LaRoche to be Of
fered for sale, and besides asking alimony
| from her husband, together with attor-
neys' fees, she asks an injunction against
him and the auctioneers restraining them
from selling the property Her suit was
filed by Messrs. Denmark & Adams.
OTHER MATTERS SETTLED.
The intervention Of the Germania Bank
in the case of the Euclid Avenue National
Bank VS.. the Chatham Brewing Company
for an Indebtedness Of 1926 and interest
was allowed in the superior court yester-
day.
The arguments on the creditors bill
brought against the Chatham Furniture
Company by the Union Furniture Com
and others, for the appointment
of receiver were postponed at the re-
quest of the attorneys concerned until
! next Saturday.
The judgment of the supreme court in
the case Of the Savannah and Ogeechee
Canal Company VS.. the Suburban and
| West End railway, was, by an order OF
the court, made the judgment Of the su-
| perior court.
Mr.. w. N. Beckett was reappointed a
| commercial notary public.