The Lebanon express. (Lebanon, Linn County, Or.) 1887-1898, 1894-10-19
CIRCUIT COURT DOCKET.

court for the term beginning on next
Monday, Oct. %:
DEPT. l.--e. H. BURNETTE, JUDGE.
Thirty-six old cases and the followin
new ones: .
Christian Bleisch VS. Gus and Lizzie
kranger, recovery Of money, attach
ment.
Christian Bleisch ys John and r r
burnette, recovery of money attach
Thos Taylor & Co VS. HI Cranor. re-
coyery OF money, attachment.
b y Griffin vs The Farmers and
Merchants Insurance Co, recovery Of
money attachment. :"
Phlilip Cohen VS. Rachel and Geo w
purslfull, recovery of money, attach
ment. "''S
smith q Jones VS. Rachel and Geo W
ment. "''"''i-
K B Anderson vs. Geo W Luper, re.
covery OF money, attachment.
Chevalier & Co VS. H L Cranor re-.
coyery OF money, attachment.
-, John Robson vs. A L Douglas and q
ment. "'sa'''-
samuel Il Young VS. II E and Marc E
Burmester, recovery of money
Knapp, Burrell & Co vs. A B Patter-
son, recovery of money. "'''
II Farwell vs. N Needham copntv
clerk, petltlon tor writ OF mandamns
. u Young VS. J s Lilies, recovery of
money. 'so'o's VI
Z a Cochran vs. The Farmers and
M erchants lns Co., recovery Of money
D NJ Osborne & Co, a cornorat;nu u'ey. "
alonza, Grant and Mary j Wigle, re-
coyery OF money, attachment, ~ "
u b Haight VS. Geo W Luper and I'll
Luper, recovery of money. attachmant
- W Rails vs. The Farmers and
money. ~ ieoo'ery oi
Samuel E Young VS. N B Frv recoverv
OF money, attachment ''e'9
- stewart 4 sox VS. A zysett, recovery |
OF money, attachment. 'e''
Will q Link VS. W H and Fl i Man,a
et al, recovery of money. attachmant
n JOS u Kelly vs the Harrisburg Watar
money. ' iecoVery oi
J 1 Hill VS. ] L Lilies. recoverv u
money, attachment. 'eis u
Ella Talbot VS. The Farmers 4 Mer
CHANTS insurance Co, recovery Of monev
: schoollng vs. ] W Ling, Ida N
=. lalng et al recovery Of money. attach.
y watt vs. Harrisburg Mercantile
70, possession Of personal Dropertv
" = Gitchens vs. John T McNe;I ro
covery of money. '' 'e
DEPARTMENT., H.H. HEWITT INNER
new cases: o"i"s
milton Hale VS. H and NJ J Townsend
ct 81, foreclosure of mortgage
Mary b Malson VS. c W Malson divorcs
y Bushnell VS. Frank D Wood Of al
OF mortgage.
LINN county National Bank VS. n
Jranor. Confirmation.
Lam County National Bank vs. O and
Jornella Jennings. Confirmation
~ beall, receiver, VS. James f Clark
md Clark. Confirmation.
= Smith VS. J H Bridges and NJ A
'rldges ct al. Confirmation
Charles Henry VS. M Van Als.;no :,
Confirmation. " '''
W Phillips VS. u G Havne Of nv co.
0oH'
\ + Mccormack VS. Waterloo Develop.
nent Company, Confirmation.
Lane !, n. Lumber League VS. F A Burkbart
hu p" Ii Goltra. Confirmation.
Inc Albany B&LA VS. Lizzie and G w t
Iels. Confirmation, \
y y Dung ct al vs. ] B Writ ct al. In 4
ohct'oh suit to set aside deed.
omer WheeIervs Hattie Titus, Partition
) L hendrix VS. G 9 Baber ct al, parti- ;
ion. "' '''i- !
Il, Foley VS. so Wallace ct nj Foreo,os
re ofmortgage. s'o9 !
Louie Hunter VS. A r Hunter Divorce Z
James Mccartney VS. Board of Trustees of v
ae 'e cumberland Presbyterian church, Soda. t
NE foreclosure of mortgage, =
Leo Gerhard and Henry Gerhard admin. v
''rators' VS. Geo 7 and Mary NJ Warner
oreclosure of mortgage.
X H Wright VS. L and Rosa e Hansard
oreclosure of mortgage.
sylvester Pennoyer, "Goyernor,' ct al vs
'm Cochran and W T Cochran ct al
oreclosure of mortgage.
n Wyatt VS. Martha Hohanan and 7 n
'ohanan ct al Foreclosure of mortgage I
l J. Munkers vsG W johnson and Mary S
Johnson ct al. Foreclosure of MORTGAGE j
Linn County National Bank VS. H Hvde t
rancis Hyde and Sophia Joseph Fore, +
losure of mortgage.
o'a1e OF Oregon VS. John Enright. Lar, ;,
eny. !
y N baohner VS. Charlotte s Cohen and =
amuel Bissinger. Foreclosure of mort. !
age, Il
Luella Stowe VS. A f Stowe, Divorce t
Henry Broders VS. G Bohanan 81 al p
'oreclosure of chattel mortgage. f
A II Logan Vs Agnes Logan. Divorce fl
Wood Wanted.
All who have taknn p,hsan;,t;on, ~,