The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1894-02-01
THE AleAER COURTS.
second Supreme pistrict.

Court OF Civil Appeals-B. d. Tarlton,
chief iustico: II. o. Head and L. w
Stephens associate Justices, Located at
Fort Worthy
Fort Worth, Texas. January Sl.-'rhe fol-
lowing decisions were handed down by the
court of civil appeals today:
II. NJ Beeville W.. William Rusk ct al,
from Wise county; affirmed.
w. r. Evans vs. George Il. Martin ct nj.
from Denton county; affirmed.
j. c, Carpenter VS.. II G. Sanburn, from
Denton county; affirmed.
Snyder 3 Davis vs., A. j, Roe, from
Mitchell county; affirmed.
Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railway
company Us, w. j. Wheeler, from Wise
county; affirmed.
Texas and Pacific Railway company,
from Wise county; affirmed.
Western Union telegraph company VS..
W. II. Sides. from Stephens county, af-
firmed.
G. II. Ward VS.. Flint & Knapp ct al,
from Taylor county; affirmed.
The Mccormick Harvester and Machine
company VS.. J. s, Slower from Wise
county; reversed and remanded.
The following motions We're this day
decded-L II. Wilson ct al VS. W. l..
Doggett ct al motion TO Gle transcript
granted; John IL, Rooler VS.. c, H. Reed
ct al. motion for rehearing refused: w.
IS sAANAlSpu Va - - -AtlAAflfhis illNistAl
to dismiss appeal grapted J. G. Kerr ct
al VS.. Morrison, Street 6 Co., motion to
submit suggestion OF delay granted John
f. Rooler VS.. G. h. Reed ct al, motion
TO file additional conclusions OF law and
fact granted; Lake Como Land and I'M
proYement company, motion 30 file briefs
granted; Emerson, Talcott & Co. vs., r. f.
Williams ct al. motion TO file transcript
granted; c. NJ Greenlee vs. T Cluclt et al
motion to dismiss appeal granted; Wlcn-
Ia Valley Railway company VS.. il r.
Gray, motion to reverse and render grant
ed: Wichita Valley Railway company vs.
Charles Bingesser, motion to reverse and
render granted; Wichita Valley Railway
company VS. Thomas Pickett ct al, motion
to reverse and render granted; John Il.
Rooler VS.. c, u. Reed, supplemental mo-
tlon for rhearing refused; Emerson, Tai
colt & Co VS.. 2. f. Williams ct al, mo-
ton to affirm on certificate refused,
The following motions were this day
submitted--Lone Star Elevator company
VS.. Il, NJ. English, motion TO file record;
A. S. McCammart VS.. NJ d. Roberts, mo.
ton for rehearlng; G. w. Wood vs.. Shaw
nee Lodge /. o. o. r.. motion to affirm
on certiftcate; State National bank of Yer
non VS.. Waxahache National bank, mo-
ton to file Transcript D. Frank Dering VS.
Houston and Texas Central Railroad com
pany, motion for rehearins! Texas and
Pacific Railroad company w. ), y. Hop
ldns, motion for rehearins; F. L. Aleott
ct al VS.. BENJAMIN Ferris, mellon for re-
hearing; Fort Worth and Denver City
Railroad company vs.. Charles Goldberg.
motion to file transcript; b. H. Black vs.
II. A. TiIlett, motion for rehearlng; A,
Moore ct al VS.. II. Il, Powell, motion for
rehearing; Texas and Pacific Railroad
company VS., r, Watson ct al, motion for
rchearing; r. NJ. James ct al VS.. r. w,
Greathouse. motion 10 Gle record; Mers
chants National bank OF Fort Worth vs..
r. D. McAnulty ct al. motion to Gle rec
ord; Peter Yource vs. j. u. League, mo-
tion 10 file record; Baxter Smith, Jr, VS.,
W. L. Yiokers & Co, motion to file rec
ord