Delaware gazette and state journal. (Wilmington, Del.) 1883-1902, 1894-12-20
SIX MONTHS lNJAIL FOR DEBS
And Three for His Fellows of
the A. r. u.
THEIR CASES TO Be APPEALED
Debs More Responsible Than
the Others.
The Court Declared That it was In His
Power, by Merely lifting His Voice, to
Put Stop to the Railway Disturbances
An Appeal TO be Taken From Judge
Woods Decision.


Cp,c,oo Tn, D.c 1A-uGniltv os
charrnj fS Was s' th, tindi,g ouponnrc1 ~.
a., H. EoJerot In,Ira Wi,i;am 4 WooJs
AGAINST President Aucene u, Debs Of
snna tinding was renortel arainst tho
nther american Railway Union leaders
ON trial with Debs, -
The court finds the defendants guilty
Of contempt, as charged in each of the
cases. The same sentences will be
ordered in both cases, but it is not in
tended that they shall be cumulative.
THE SENTENCE.
cu,c,oo H., Dcc 1I-Tudoo Woods
t,,lnv so,,t.nnni EnTone " hehs the
ic,Ior If Ne N,noricen p.ilwov Tfninn
str;i-n a., Nv months in thn cnnptv iaiI
os " ,,,,,ishmnnt fnr yioiotinG Inc
Ini,rctiInm iss,,nj il, LirsaIf MA Iuhue
Gy,Sscu1 i,ly I'll I,st n thn rast ri
tho mon viii thc'cxcrntion of McVrap,
hn ""yn ,hrso ,nSntLs In mo casc nf
T,.L-san santo,nc l. spsnnndsd San.
tencs is mi rnnnIatfvn coyerinr the
cases ~ ,hn ,rvornn,ont and tho santa
NJ Railroad nrnins, INA man. The same
snntanrais ;m5nsad in eorb case INT MOTH
sontences hn5in and and AZ Tho snn,s
| time bcpinning December 2!th. Thr
dnfsnd,nts ira IL Y D4hs president.
| q ~ UnwarJ mathematician. silver.
| ton Eeliihor Socrntarv. /, " Rnrprs.
| M 7 ElIiott Iurnv 'IInT.r WiIlion,
| Rnrns N NcVnnp Inrnv N EDnl.
win Tse sontence ia gencrnlIv CON.
eidnroa :, iirht ON,
~ nh
Inc case VIII ne appealed IN speak
ing Oh me ueclslon Attorney DarroW'
VINO represented INC aeleNuahts, salu
Inc decision Is eat laWI Out the sell
tence is femarkAoiy cement
hlce-presiueht howard salu ne was
prepared 20 expect anything. Ffeslaeht
Deus was more cast uo"h thah any "l
the others.
IL was IN the ulscrctlon OF tue court
to sentence the men to any term OF
years ne choose Wlthin constitutional
minus anu 70 lmposeahy Hhe ne lhought
ht'
All oil the detendants were III court,
with the exception oil Leroy NJ. Good
win, whose whereabouts are not known
and VINO could not, thereiere' DC mott
ned; The contempt Tor winch the de-
PENDANTS We're arralgned was violation
h an lIIuhGtloh iss1eN Iuly ~ W
SnrhaJo oil 49, =" ir,arf.ra ,,i,t .ra, G
IN anW ,Sa,. nhatsnavnr II w,s n,Si,nnJ
~ ~. II" ftyni,sJ Sta,es j;str;c, at1nrnaS.
~, nahs nnI ,ho N,hor nt,icnrs and ~
rno,,r. ,f tha nSoricnr PniIn.n,, H.,
ronantaSiv niaiatnd Tiki nrinr' ~ ~
G,i,r, ~; ;ss,,im,, dira,,ions - ,,''ir
I;a,,,a,a,;,. ali 80 No o',,,,tr,, o., Iii
mnt ,ha NOV ana alv,sirg tho :rinnIin, In
~ thn cnrI riotn raiirr,a systo,n X ~
Ifnited S,a,es If nnssiiJ. III" 5,.r,nno
I'D VS. 10, haIs mi HE os'iI,nn,s
hnd r;,St "a orJar str;t,s al 20 80
,;nne ~ 5cn,Jrct tto,r sido If mo I'LL iT
agro;nst tho roi,rnaJs
H. his ,,,;,,io,, -, tl,o case T,d,o
WI a. dI,ina a., f,i H." '""5o
,.rTho Cn,,rt ,I,orafs,ro ti,,Is tho 1os,,a
orts nniItv nf tho nfTarcas os "Sar,ad i,
mo ;nI,ctn,"nt" in ho,t o"so S" IA ,,t ~
Sx M nnnisL,nart tbo $50 i IN 49, mtt
naaos hui ur;ii nnt nab !, ~ S ,i,'a
80, ,,,r;,tnr, A. ~
;shn,a,. co. ,hosa No. rn aty p pni,
~ ~ than, b,, s;l,ht ~ I. y
: wv VI mn Sns hs .nis 10
tha Saf S '1 oh w ~ =, enon gu, u.
~ ~ ~, ,,,.nt ~, Iii I, " sP'"N "
iiie anu say "n"' 'u'y WIN
DEFENDANTS HAVE NoTiliNG TO SAY
Deep silence followed this declaration
7 of the Court. Then mighty hum
arose, and soon the defendants were OF
their fee: and engaged in conversation
with their counsel, Then Attorne!
barrow spoke for the nine defendant
as follows:
"Iheso defendants have nothing Il
say. They believe that they did RICH
1 in ordering and continuing this strike
Two of these defendants-Mr. McNcal
4 and MIR. Elltott-tonk no active part il