The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1894-05-05
from Honolulu District Court. David

| Tong; unlawful possession OF opium
Appeal from Honolulu District Court.
Davidson for defendant.
Jacob Lyons VS.. }. Huoash and Z.
Bachelor; assumpsit. Carter & Car
ter for plaintiff; G. w. Ashford for
defendant Bachelor.
Louisa Rodriguez vs.. Doningos
Comes; covenant. Carter q Carter
for plaintiff; G. w Ashford for de-
PENDANT.
L. Ahlo VS.. Tai Lung; assumpsit.
c. w. Ashford for plaintiff; Hatch for
defendant.
! 5. A. Newell VS.. ]. NJ. Horner; ac-
ton on foreign judgment. Neumann
for plaintiff; c. w. Ashford for de-
| PENDANT
William A. Dyer vs.. Hop Yune
Company; assumpsit. G. Brown for
| plaintiff; G. w. Ashford for defend
! ant.
II. r. Macfarlane We. Ira \. Lowell;
| assumpsit. Carter & Carter for plain
| tiff; Hatch for defendant.
Hawaiian Lodge VS.. F. III. Redward;
| assumpsit. Carter & Carter for plain
| tiff; c. w. Ashford for defendant.
T. w. Rawlins VS.. Honolulu Soap
Works Company; damages. C.Brown-
Kinney for plaintiff; Hartwell-Hatch
for defendent.
Ralph r. Foster VS.. II. NJ. Hayward;
trespass on the case. Foster for plain
tiff; Neumann for defendant.
Thomas Mott VS.. a. Mcdowell ct al:
assumpsit. Appeal from Honolulu
District Court. Kinney for plaintiff
appellant; V. V. Ashford for defend
ants.
HIgashi VS.. Pacific Sugar Mill; case.
Neumann-Foster for plaintiff; Hatch
for defendant.
Julia J. Freitas vs. Joao f. Souza;
breach OF promise of marriage. Ma
goon for plaintiff; c.. w. Ashford for
defendant.
J. A Magoon VS.. zee King Tong;
ejectment. MagoOn for plaintiff;
Davidson for defendant.
JURY WAIVED.
HoOmana Kaoao VS.. VIM. Norton; |
replevin. Appeal from Honolulu Dis |
appellant; Carter & Carter for defen-
dant.
Allen s. Robinson VS.. O.. w. Lin |
coin ct al; assumpsit. Hatch for |
plaintiff; Magoon-Kinney for defen-
dants.
Kamai VS.. Anima; assumpsit. APP
peal from Honolulu District Court.
Kaulia for plaintiff; Achi for defen-
dant appellant.
Il 4
Appeal from Honolulu
District Court. Magoon for plaintiff;
Neumann for defendant. appellant
John Mott vs.. G. W. Lincoln ct al;
Magoon for plaintiff;
tch-Kinney for defendants.
Honolulu Steam Planning Mill VS.. P.
Muhlendorf ct al; assumpsit. Ma
COON for plaintiff; Hatch Kinney for
Lee King VS.. D. K. Publ; assump-
sit. Appeal from Honolulu District
w. r. Castle for acknowledgement
Mrs. G. Bachelor VS.. Phil Braun;
Appeal from Honolulu
District Court. Kinney for plaintiff;
Creighton for defendant appellant.
Y. All Yau VS.. j. K. Iaukea; dam
age. Appeal from Honolulu District
Court. Achi for neutrality-suspicious.;
for defendant.
William Kauahi vs. All Chew; tres
pass. Appeal from Honolulu District !
Court. Kaulukou for plaintiff; Car
ter & Carter for defendant-appellant
Nj. a. Gonsalves 81 Co. vs.. LUZ An
drade; assumpsit. Appeal from Homo
lulu District Court. Johnson for plain
tiff; Magoon for defendant-appellant.
Almira NJ. kahananui VS.. c. B.
Miles; action on contract. V. V. Ash
lord for plaintiff appellant; Kinney
Tor defendant.
Cheong Tai vs. David Watson; dam
ages. Appeal from Koolaupoko Dis
5rict Court. Achi for defendant-ap-
pellant.
Ching On VS.. F. Ludoviko; assump-
sit. Appeal from Honolulu District
Court. Magoon for plaintiff; Kaulu-
zou for defendant-appelIant
Ching Sing vs. Lau Bon; assumpsit.
Appeal from Honolulu District Court.
Carter & Carter for plaintiff; V. V.
Ashford for defendant-appellant.
Kalei Maunaloa VS.. Kealohapauole
replevin. Appeal from Wal
llua District Court.
Lau Lam Chan VS.. Lau Ho; as
Appeal from Honolulu Dis
riot Court. Magoon for plaintiff
appellant; w. r. Castle for defen.
lant.
L. B. Kerr VS.. John Good ct al; as
umpsit. Appeal from Honolulu Dis.
riot Court. Parke for plaintiff; C.
". Ashford for neutrality-suspicious.. .
Z. 3. HoOkano VS. All Soon; dam
ges. Appeal from Koolaupoko Dis
riot Court. Achi for plaintiff
ant.
w. 81. Richard VS.. S. M. Kaaukai;
ssumpsit. Appeal from Honolulu
District Court. Kahookano for plain
lift; Achi for defendant-appellant.
Wailuu Kekaula VS.. S. NJ. Kaaukai;
Appeal from Honolulu
district Court. Johnson for plaintiff,
Achi for Neutrality-suspicious..
81. y. Crabbe VS.. Z. @. Hitchcock, |
replevin. Appeal from |
honolulu District Court. a. M.
'rown for defendant-appellant.
DIVORCES AND SEPARATIONS
Kuhinu (w), vs.. Kalepe. Rosa for
laintiff: G. Brown for defendant.
Lilly Mahi VS.. Maka Mahi. G.. W.
ashford for plaintiff; Kinney for de-
endant. =
II. Keliiinulama (wl, VS.. X. Kaona.
Nauiia for plaintiff; Creighton for de- !
endant.
III. @. McGrew VS.. Alphonsine Nc
rev. Hartwell-Carter & Carter for
10, Y Al l. i