The Wilmington daily Republican. (Wilmington, Del.) 1890-1902, 1894-12-01
FIFTH EDITION.



legal business wae transacted
Tho casee OF Mabel L., Edwina L., and
John w. Adair were continued until the
next term under peremptory rule.
John II. Rodney; referee. was referred
son. George Ii. Kerr. Charles Gouert aud
Percy Darlington Va, Horace MoDnnnell
The cases were set for trial Wednesday of
next week. James Ponder appeared for
tho plaintiffs and William s. HiIles the
defendant.
The special Jury list was then taken up
Levi Bird, representing the defendant In
the case OF johnson & Barnhlfl VS.. the
Baltimore and Philadelphia Railroad Com.
pany, reported that the case would proba.
bly, not be tried. The snlts oil Benjamin
L Kent. William II. Weskc and Kent and
Weeks We. the Wilmington City Railway
were passed.
settlement was announced In the dam
age case OF Mary A. Hart vs. tho p, W. &
u katlroad Company. Tho case OF James
Z; C1yie We the \; P, 4. 4; Company
went went TO the foot OF the list On January
the cases OF Elmer Reeve VS.. the vii.
mington City Railway Compa Charles
heidel VS.. the p, W Il b. Railroad Com.
Iany, and Joseph Is. walsli's administra.
tor vs. the b. q o. II. II Company will be
taken up.
The case OF Amelia L. FinueRan va the
Wilmington City Railway Company was
continued until the February term on the
application OF MIR. Salisbury. Charles j.
Giobons case against the City Railway
Company was set for trial on December
II. MIR. Bird represents Mr.. Gibbons,
MIR. Bird had the case OF Charles e.
Smith Va. the T., W. IL b. Railroad Com
pnny contin ued until the February term.
The cases oil sorerln Wazoiiski and Ida v.
Pyle Va. the r., W. Il B. Railroad Dom.
pany were continued until February on
the application OF Mr.. Gray who repre-.
SCENTS the defendant company.
Martin Y. Huber's case against the Jack.
son and Sharp Company also went over
until tho next term.
The case Of Jerome Conroy, ct. al, yes
stricken from tho list. IL not being at
iseue.
The case Of Theodore Jones vs. H. II.
Brady, ct. al, flushed the llst. 1t was
continued until the ncxt term.
THE LICENSE CASES.
The contested liquor cases were then
taken up. William s. Pickett OF the Law
anu order Society opposed the granting oil
license to Mahoney q Brother. at No. 81
south Justison street. on the ground that
thh proprietor Ind sold liquor on Sunday.
Walter Hayes and Peter Cooper appeared
Tor the applicant.
Several witnesses were examined and
one Joseph II. Hammnnd. testified that
on one occasion he went into the saloon
on sunday and called for drink OF
whisky but was refused. He then salu
well. I'LL that" at the same time handing
a mask 10 theibartender. Joseph said thu
flask WAS filled with some liquid. blu;
he declared he did not know wha,
10 was. He said lie offered no money
Tor the bottle or its contents. and left tho
place.
4. b. Helsel appeared for John ]. Croean.
OF No. 500 Tntnail. Mr.Crolan conducted
against by MIR. Prickett because Of the Jis.
order there Witnesses were called who
testified that no disorder had been car.
ried OH in the place to their acknowledge.
Dilworth +. Wells application for the
rs.licenaing Of the hotel known as Perry's
Tavern, Oh the Concord Pike was opposed
on the ground that the former proprietor
had cold liquor TO minors and also that
much disorder was carried OH there. The
present applicant has been the tenant
only month. Walter Hayes and Peter
Cooper appeared for him.
Mr.. Prickett opposed the licensing OF
the saloon at No. IA East Second street
and kept by August Ii. Krlenen because
the proprietor had sold liquor on Sunday
ms remonstrance against W. L. Honey
OF No. 5l7 East Fourth street for selling
liquor on Sunday was Withdrawn by Mr.
Prickett. the charge not being sufficient
Court,
Christopher Profmmer advoca,ed tho
licensing Of his house at Water aud Mar.
ket streets. bur as IL had been turned
down before the court said further april.
cation was useless.
The applications of James Deeney for n
snloon at seventh avenue and Duncan
street. nnd that of Waiter Z. Cheaylus at
McCnnlley and Lombard streets. when
have both baen turned down before were
again turned down. John BiR1Rs an.
peared FOR Dseney and Henry q. Turner.
Mr.. Cheuvins.
When the application of Michael Golden
was taken up MIR. Pickett made a hard
light but afterward reiented, the circum.
stances attending the application Deiu0
entirely different from those he supposed
Golden wants lincenee to sell liuuor al
the Pennsylvania House. at Front and
hing street, Mrs. Julian Hanrahan form.
eriy CONNECTED the place and was recently
convicted Tor selling iQbor on Sunday.
Mr. Prickett said MIR. Gulden's name In
the Application was only figure head
mrs. Hanrahan being the rsal applicant.
lie opposed the granting on that GROUND.
Frank Hoifecker and Walter Hayes how.
ever came to the applicants rescue Just as
the court was about to drop the case. Mr.
Hohecker said that true Ii was Mira. Han
rahan owned tho building but il thu
license was granted he assured the eouri
that Mr.. Golden would conduct the bust.
ness.
lie, as also would Mr.. Hayes, zee that
the court was not imposed upon IL tho
license was granted. MIR. Pickett there.
upon withdrew his remonsLrancss the
court at tho same time remarkiuH that tho
application OF long-establlsned hotels
was entirely different from those OF sa-
looms.
TINS finished tho casss and the court