The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1894-05-06

for the Third Judicial district OF Utah
territory, county of Salt Lake. Loui;a
ColtEEin and j. Il Grant. as administrators
plaintiffs, vs.. Estslle Veatch. Carlton w.
Veatch, w. H. Fairchild. James Thomp-
son so r., Aaron "A keyser. III p Mason. Z. D.
company a corporation. Joseph @. Arm
strong, William E. Crutcher and 4. a.
Brim, Utah National Bank, Bank of Phil
Jones & Schroeder. defendants.@suni a.
mons.
The. people Of the territory of Utah send
greeting: To Estelle veateh, Carlton W.
Neatch, W. n Fairchild. James Thomp-
$oSn, Aaron keyser, H P. Mason, r. D.
company. a corporation, Joseph G. Arm
strong, William E Crutcher, and s. a
Brim, the Utah National Bank, Bank of
Phillips, Elmer B. Jones and Albert T.
schroeder. partners doing business as
jones 81 Schroeder. defendants
You are hereby required TO appear in an
action brought against you by the above
named plaintiffs in the district court of
: the Third judicial district OF the territory
81 Utah, ana to answer the complaint
tiled therein within ten days exclusive of
the day. Of service) after the service on
you OF this sumnons-f served within this
county; OR, Il served out of this county,
but in this district, within twenty DAYS:
otherW1Se within forty days-or Judgment
by default will be taken against YOU ac-
cording to the prayer of said complaint.
The said action is brought to have judg-
rnent against the defendants Veatch
Veateh, Fairchild and Thompson. on two
causes OF action as follows: First. in the
sum Of $500. with interest at i6Gs rer
annum until Dec. p, 1891, and from Dec
q, 1881 till paid at 15ze6 per month and on
SlOO from July q, 1881 at 11e95 per month,
for 800 attorneys fee, and costs of suit:
alleged 10 be due on a certain promissory
note executed by defendants Eeatch
eeaten ana Il ballrrehild to one L. C. Cross
IL
2,400, with interest till maturity al iOe,
per annuna, and after maturity on an de-
terrea payments AZ I329o per month; same
the sum of $40 with interest at ~ per
ncnth after. maturity till paid, and for
$50 attorneys fees; alleged TO be due on a
certain promissory note, executed by de-
PENDANTS Neatch, Veatch and FairchiId. to
said CrosSman, July q, 1871 with intsre5t
after maturity at 20 per month due rive
months after date, for S140. same being
due and wholly unpaid; both said noteS
being secured by mortgages on same
property which is hereinafter described,
executed by defendants Neatch to said
Crossnlan; said notes and mortgages hav-
ing been duly assigned to plaintiffs. who
are now s5d the owners thereof; 70
said property sold and proceeds APP
piled in payment of costs Of
suit and amounts due on said two
causes of action: that interests of other
defendants herein be declared SUBSEQUENT
to those of plainuhS-and for other relief:
said premises are described as blocks =
and Y, and the east one-half of block 8,
plat c, Garden City survey. Salt Lake
county, Utah.
And you are hereby notified that if you
fail to appear and answer the said COM
plant as above required, the said plaintiff
WIN apply to the court for the relief de-
nanded therein.
Witness. the Hon. Samuel A. Mer-
rift. judge, and the seal of the dis
trict court of the Third Judicial
(Seal.) district, in and for the territory of
Utah, this nth day of February in
the year of our Lord one thousand
eight hundred and ninety-four
DAVID c. DUNBAR,
BY GEO. D. LOOMS, Clerk
Deputy Clerk.
Young. Young & Moyle. attorneys for
plaintiff.