Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1894-11-03
This Injunction Suit Came Up Before
Judge Merritt Today.
Argument Had Upoa This, But the
Hearing On The Complaint
Goes over.

could be possibly rushed through, and
when the end Of smsllcr things was
reached he turned his oar to the talk o
counsel in the Bect-Ryan Injunction
tuit, concerning which a great zeal
has been already said Tut not muun,
thus far, done.
hscELLANEous BUSINESS
The following orders wers made dur.
ing the first hour and hall Of tue
session..
Stuart Stephenson Va Jack. De.
fendhnt Withdrew his demurrer and
consented to judgment, which was en-.
tered accordingly.
up. MeiI,lfup We Nat NJ. Brigham.
Hearing on motion 10 s,fike out
answer continued MI Saturday, Nov.
ION.
Matilda Compton Va John A. Comp.
ton. Order to show cause tor con.
tempt continued by consent ulI Nov.
Ion.
In the divorce suit Of Josephine G..
Johuson Va Gustav q. Johnson, hear.
ing was hal on OTlcr t. show cause
why temporary alimOuy, attufnel =
iee., ETC., should not be- paid by the
defendant. Evidence as to ths de-
ftndanps mUauB having been taken,
tue court made an order Tor tue pay.
ment OF $40 pUr month alimUny aud
80 Attorney fUus,
Chau. L., POmeroy VI CatHlU W.
Foley al. judgment anu decree Ny
Iufault.
Martha II. Taylor " T.. J. Smith ct
81. Deftu Of ". II. Rove anu iuIg.
nent against him oniy.
Matthew Gibbs IT al W. the Twenty.
iour,h Sonooi district. Of4ur uismiss.
INK appeal entered by attorneys Tor
fcHppuuUni.
Ouou T.. Arnold VI Big Cottonwood
Power company. Order 10 snow cause
continued ull Saturday, November
10 o., by cJnseut.
John Buuoe W w. IL. II uGnelmur.
Demurrer TO complaint sustained; ten
days allowed plaintiff 10 amend.
Chas. StetHa ct al W EIz ,beth q.
Wicker ham ct al. Demufru o. com.
plaiut argued anu ovvrfrlvu; ten DAYS
allowed 10 HnbWUf.
&. L.. MuktUhHn Va Isabella McKib.
ben; divorce. Hearing on order 10
snow cause Tor payment ~ alimony,
etc. After listening to testimony ~ 10
plaintii's means, tho court directed
that I've pay $40 per month alimony
aud $40 attorneys fees.
Usn d Montana Machinery 90. W.
4. J. Moran, Demurrer to complaint
set for hearing ON Saturday, NOyUm-
Der lOth.
Bank Of SisaoD, Crocker & Go. W.
VIM. IL. Smith. Hearing On motion
10 strike out answer aud Tor Judgment
,et for Saturday, November lUtn.
Lucy Mafsn w the Salt Lake Build.
Ing a Loan association. Order To
show cause restraining sale under ttu.t
deed set Tor hearing noAt Saturday.
BACK AGAINST RYAN.
Ifthis case should TO sought 10 a
1uish," present Indications are that IL
will prove to be one Oi the mOst inter.
esliug N not "senfniiOnal" In the
channel OF Third district Injunction
suits In recent days.
a week or no ago John Beck OBJ
tainod temporary restraining order
against Henry NJ Ryan, and the LAT.
ter gentleman was required to show
cause In open court to-day why he this
applying also 10 the National B,uk OF
the RepubUc) should not DO purInau.
entity euiOinud from negotiating or
uisuosiug of the plaintiffs note for
$50 u0j, also from acting or attempting
10 act as a director OF tbs Bullion. BvcK
q Champion mining company, or ~
Mt. Beck'e agent.
Counsel for tue plaintiffs now are
Judge henderson anu Attorney A fthur
Brown attorney Cfilohow having
been "let Oup" since the original action
by Mr.. Beck was tileu). Mr. Ryan Is
represented by Attorneys W. n. Dick.
sou anu Farley l.. Williams.
It was not until this morning. that
counsel for tho defense fled their Hn.
aver, and with II n demurrer ~ tho
complaint.
The complaint, which IL OF con.
IlleTable lungth, contains charses OF "A
most seTlUua ~ well ~ VI n decidedly
unoumplimentATy character. la II
false representations on the part OF
The defendant are alleged, the PLAIN.
IA avuTfing that such representations
we're made by Ryan To induce Beck
20 place himself Ia such position
That the former might dslraud him
lut Of his property. plaintiff declares
mat defendant never was man OF
capital, but that he 10 an Rdventufsr
from Chicago, pugiltt, buncD
iteeTet, n confidence man, anu an all
round sport known 10 "CabUago
Ryan"
In his answer Mr.. Ryan gives an
unqualified and Indignant denial
20 all the cnarses maue against
him. lie, Ia turn. makrs a
long reply, IN the course OF which Ii
IL tet form that he wis wtOugfully dis.
charged from Bruk's employ On Ou,aner
!2nd, aud his authority rryokuJ unuer
heir agreement 10 hts damage In tnr
ium Of ;45 OuO. lie pfays that the
note for $iu,UUJ lie uliuigsu "a yaIIu
leu ulUu MT. BrCk's Oh 90 shafes of
took anu u valid clam aga nst him,
Ind that he may recover luds meut
Igal n plaintiff tors 900 additional.
When tnt case was called Attprney
ATnut Brown informed tnu court that |
lia Hidu was aux iOus 10 have Attorney |
JTltonlOw examined ab uuu Of their |
Rilntrgts, hut IN COusrqusnce |
i0mtelio M ctiOu that gentleman was |
unable To 10 present t1uHy. tWH- |
lueteioTe mutually agreed mat argu.
mrnts should be nad on lhs demurrer |
only, anu tnat when these nad been
unlimited lurther hratlug shuulu 40
over until another day, 10 DO agree
lpOn later.
With this understanding, Attorney
Dickson pr4creued 20 explain tue
upon which the demurrer was
basrJ-- nat the compliant diu not state