Santa Fe daily New Mexican. [volume] (Santa Fe, N.M.) 1885-1897, 1894-04-30

SIaVeu, were rejected.
The court in passing upon the Arizona
grants held that those made by the
state of Sonora were void; also grants
made by the Intendents subsequent to
February "a, 1921, the date of the Plan of
Iguala, were void. This will leave only
three claims in Arizona that can possibly
be confirmed. The record is highly
creditable to the governments attorney,
Hon. Matt G. Reynolds.
THE SANTA FEE GRANT.
Late on Saturday evening Chief Justice
Reed signed the decree in the case of the
Santa Fe grant, the following extract
from which is of public interest:
"It is therefore ordered, a2judged and
decreed by the court that the claim of
said petitioner for four square Spanish
leagues of land situated in the county of
Santa Fe, and the territory of New Mex
leo, and bounded and described as about
set forth, be and the same is hereby es
tablished and confirmed in manner fol-
lowing to-wit: All the lots within said
four square leagues of land now held in
severalty to the respective lot holders
thereof, holding said lots in privity with
said Santa Fe Pueblo grant, and all the
residue of said four square leagues to the
said city of Santa Fe in trust for the in
habitants thereof. There is reserved from
the operation of this decree and from the
effect of this confirmation all property of
whatsoever nature or kind now appro-
priated or owned by the United States for
any purpose. This decree of approval
and confirmation shall not be SO con-
strued as to confer any right or title in
the grant to any gold, silver or quicksil-
yer mines or the minerals of the same
within the exterior boundaries thereof.
And this decree of approval and con-
frmatlon shall not be so construed as to
affect or conclude the private rights of
persons or between themselves to any
lands, rights, titles or privileges within
the exterior boundaries thereof; nor shall
this decree of approval and confirmation
be so construed as to affect the title or
rights to any lands heretofore disposed of
by the United States, and it is SO or
dered."
Assignment of causes for trial in the
court of private land claims at the term
thereof commencing August 10 next:
| IL
No. 20, Neri Antonio Montoya, Aug. 23.
No. "a, Dona Ana Bend colony, passed
Ito be set at same time with No. 59.)
No. 33, Isleta, Sept. IL.
No. 81, Ignacio Chavez, Sept. 21.
No. Sc, Chino Tejano, Sept. 81.
No. SO, C. w. Lewis claimant, Aug. Is.
mos. rs and 2O7 being set jointly with
this case.)
No. Al, Rito de los Frijoles, Sept. Is.
No. A, Vigil and St. Vrain, Aug. 81.
mos. 1873, 1876, 154 and ZIG set Jointly with
this case.)
No. As, Town of Atrisco, Aug. 16. (No.
II set jointly with this case.)
No. 81, Galisteo, Aug. 21.
No. Sc, Medina, Aug. "a.
No. IS, Bartolome Baca, Aug. 20.
No. 50, Juan Gid, passed.
No. e., Bone grant, Aug. 30.
No. G3, Diego Padilla, Aug. 2S.
No. Ga, San Clemente, Aug. 20.
NO. IS, Rio del Pueblo, Aug. 81.
No. 67, Felipe Tafoya, Sept. 25.
No. 6S, Baltasar Cisneros, Sept. B.
No. 60, Lucero Spring, Sept. 4. (No. 2o9
being also set with this case.
No. 20, Nuestra Sonora de la Luz, Aug.
IA.
No. IS, Pajarito, Sept. 5.
No. ~, Canon de Carnue, Aug. II.
No. rs, San Mateo Spring, Sept. 26.
No. 76, Canada de los Alamos, Aug. Is.
No. II, Montana, Aug. Is.
No, 70, Los Cerrillos, Aug. IS.
No. 70, Sitio de los Cerrillos, Aug. 10.
No. 81, Ell Pine, Sept. 81.
No. 80, Sitio de Juana Lopez, Aug. IS.
No. 80, Gotera, Sept. 6.
No. "a, Cieneguilla, Sept. Z.
No. IS, Salvador Gonzales, Sept. 8.
No. 81, Sierra Mosca, passed.
No. SO, La Mazda, Sept. 10.
No. 80, Las Huertas, Sept. -. (No. 269
being also set with this case
No. 81, Alamitos, Sept. 10. (No. 1873, be,
ing also set with this case.
No. 80, Jose Garcia, passed.
No. SO, Salvador Lobato, Sept. IA.
No. 95, Ojo del Borrego, Sept. Is.
No. SO, Santa Barbora, Sept. "a.
No. 81, Barranca, Sept. 20.
\ No. 80, La Petaca, Oct. l..