The times. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1890-1903, 1894-03-28
BRECKINRIDGE'S "NICE FACE
EYDerlS Testify that Hiss PlllaId Wrote
that R Tuiiatsd Letter.
THE WRIT G Oh lHS CHRISTMAS CARD
Dr. Schaener Says il Is not over Four Years
Old-NaJ. Moore Contrsdicts Miss Pol
lard n cveraI Particulars.

Nt''tti-f'A A'-'' ''"'N
uuony Co prove that Madeline folaio
... ti., ..dvances which resulted in the
,..,..., ,,.....,, -.
lots "'eo" nel"ee" 0o'o''e' '' MINI '''7'
and herself was the feature OF the D'e"1"
ol promise suit to-day. A letter dated
. 1g..ie,or c,uero fuiv 2o 1854. adj
aies7eu 10 'o'olei D'e0N'''' ''s''
fsned Madeline v. Pollard was pro"u0eu
hy the defence. and experts who hao
r1mrnrrl ID with letters Acknowledged
,. -,...., Do, Miss Pollard
~ 49,, fret
te-nNtd mat inc h'i'""''''" '''
letter was that of "a person VINO "IO'e
uc others. When the July letter was
shown Miss Pollard on the stand she
rr1norucad 70 Cd forgery she said she had
t.rffeo Colonel Brcoknridge in July. 1884,
a.kIne h.s advice about the threat made
be James G.. Rhodes bat that she had
10t asked him to call on her. The de-
fence claims that the letter aatea July
.h was written by Miss fohaiA "hen
colonel Breckenridge had not answered
tnc lofer she acknowledged writing. The
disputed letter WAS not placed iu cVi-
dencc. but ID BE- known that 30 contains
AN invitation to Colonel Brcckinridee TO
call ON tao alleged writer az Wesleyan
college. and compliments him on his
"nlce face"
The only other witness was Major VIII
lNam q. Moore. iho chief of Washing-
frr's police force. who denied statements
affss Pollard SAID had been made by
colonel Breckirridro aud herself i'm his
.H.o ON two occasions. in May. 1893
,.n Colonel precklnridee promised to
marry tbe plainUn
=, 49,. ,.. .r..,te.. ..a,n
- A., ,,,o
iaI'y i"iy people were l,'S'i'I III ,.,e
''.ll 'n's moini9s ".'h 'le cas-, ,eS va
''A'l t1o IN, p's. p''e tooin i'o',,. ',
t..s-... .,...... b. t.r ,.fsI rho corrt
L .,..,.,'l., i.t. 10, ssse,nhiina and
...,. r.r. ,.,. .r,t,o, lnrr v,sit while
.......f rs,o.i.i,,ili,, ..,., e,,. ,f.,,or R,,f-
.a, p.+ 1r.,,, ,,,,tt,r,.or,l, Isd
.. ..',.-.r,d ,t io.f, e, l,,dro BRADLEY
....,t ~. ...'t, -.
.n 49,. 49,, .o ,,o
Ia 49, c,..,,.. "a .i,o
,. ,4 49,, t,,t-
49,, -, -. ,fr
D, '..,'..'.t-.,, - ,Ia-
''' 600, '''"
"3 .,n "'i'''s ''''''''u '''
'l ''''9 i".'"'i e,.,
,'"i -'i'
''''' ,''N'9 il''tD
t'' "' cue "''"u WIZ" I'i-
"i'il N"u uD'h sall at M,,'-
vows h'l between 'oloIei bre'Alhiiu5e
lA 'iiif1 ana lne witness me
".'l'l ',l' lluSe ...,,,.,.i r,"u
.' .',i o'','in' 1.,, . "'
one ''' "'s' 'i0s' ""'inb ,nd'
l'. .'''''i N"' D'i"' Nun wv
''i.''H' ana So io'tl 10 Wnlch' @D
'i', ''', CIV
''''
Z ,.... .t,.. ....teoa IN
,, n.u..t 81. -.r.....,.,. -. 49,. CON
.... .. ,f.tlr 49,, enc ,yera
I'..a f.to- ,ioor,
"'s"" "e-"'"s - ''' "'""""
us concluded his direct examination
and be WAS turned over Tor cross-eAainl-
l.'ion to Judge Wilson.
Major Moore shd in answer 10 judge
Wilson. that Dis recollection OF the CON
frrstuons in MS once between the pam
uN' the deIenuiut ana mihSeii, on May
hth and May 18th. was based almost
entirely on shorlnand notes Whlch ne
Dad made Immediately after the inter-
'ie"s- lie would hardly have rememoer-
'd much ahont ihe TWO interviews
were not Tor me shoi thano notes Juuse
Wilson wanted particularly TO Know
MhtDl,r 'hele WIS amy '"lDs salu py -Ml99
'I"ru lh 'Ne ulIeC'lon or OF SuEsrS.i"s
''"' was ,''.- ,l'eu -" 'iSJoi Noole
M'i'r '', ''' WI W.. u" "Dl,0 ,o ,'li9
r"' ''i'i' "'," .''' ','o"'u "'0i "''" 'i7
u 10 N,"n'. 'uuse h'"uiey ue0'ueu /"
l"fo' oi '-u7' "lson' ana MaJoI -NoOie
N.tor Moore s,i9 he rosde tho notes |
almost Immediately after the interviews |
ended and bis memory was largely de- |
pendent on them. lie also admitted that |
any thinps said af the interview might |
i.ra r....a3 e,ti,ef,, o,,t ~ his mind
.Nthaf MAS his colonel Rreclinridge's) |
rr..r.r ,,...,, h, ,,.ao tboeo de.i,rations |
to ,., .to,,+ ,,,,,,,in,, Nl,es polardo" |
v,.. I.9a. tvuson'e noTt question
...i.f- said Major Moore after an |
objection fo fho question had been over |
r.I.f
ID t,snf to lnov, whether ON that occa-
Sion her manner did moi indicate Salts |
f..ti,, and ,rsti0,atio, o,,.. th, ,,ro,,iee |
of r,s,risre9,'
uob 49, ohiect ia tbst ton, e.fa Col-
mi ptn a.ho,nreor hnt tl, ,,,....i,,,' No., |
IL, i 4 80 ~, 700
on. ,.,,,,,.., t,,.ii..,..a ~ M,t't,',t,, ,.,a |
,.rstife9fion"
D- .,4i,cct ,,..,,irstio, IA. Mr. eholhv
,f.t,- Moon. ,,..o o,eetioned Win ref- |
......, -, .t,,.,,c,te mt bad hesn made |
t. ,t,,, ,,.n.n ,re,io,elv -, tbo stand
..a d, t,ceo r,d~c wilson Objected ON !
tI. ..,o,,,d fhat tbev mad AN been gone |
.o,.r before and ne WAS sustained I'm |
several instances. Executions were noted |
le Tho defence. This concluded Major |
No0rc's TESTIMONY.
, ,..,,.,., 1T.
-. .,
~. ' e',a',..el N'pu's w., ~, ,ea