The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1894-06-10
THE nLorrEK.
UNITED STATES coURr-HAsFoap. ..

United States VS.. Lee Fook Bow-De-
PENDANT arraigned and pleaded not guilty.
United States VS.. w. j. Howard-De-
PENDANT arraigned and pleaded guilty to
second count in indictment for smuggling.
United States VS.. Jacob Learnsbury-De-
PENDANT arraigRed and pleaded not guilty.
United States VS.. James Heay and Frank
l. Bangs-Defendants arraigned and given
until Monday TO plead.
Charles c. Slack vs.. r. l.. Grant ct al
Suit on bond; argued and given to jury;
verdict.
United States W.. Jean Bemollier-smug-
Cling; arraigned and pleaded not guilty.
United States VS.. Eugene Delair--Smug-
Cling; defendant arraigned and pleaded
not guilty.
United States VS.. Adam Smith ct al
Contempt of court; Defendant Charles
pearing.
United States VS.. Clinton w. Adams
Counterfeiting: defendant arraigned and
pleaded not guilty.
United States vs.. Fred Sommer--Coun-
terfeiting: defendant arraigned and pleaded
not guilty.
United States VS.. Frank +. Darling
Passing counterfeit coin: defendant ar
raigned and pleaded not guilty.
United States VS.. George Jaryis-Unlaw-
fully taking and secreting letter; defend-
ant pleaded not guilty; jury impsneied.
SUPERIOR couRr-oIvIL pEPARrnEST-os
BORN, J.
Seattle National bank VS.. Pacific Heat
and Power Co.-Consolidated with Ameri-
can Radiator Co. vs.. Andrews ct al; on
trial: continued until June Is.
Markey ct al. VS.. Observation-Disclosures
of Judgment debtor; continued to June 10.
Brodek ct a. VS.. Farnum ct al.-Motion
OF defendant Ssetson for new trial; con-
unued TO June f6
carry ct al. vs.. Catiin-M Motion for new
trial: continued TO June l6
A. Z. Hotallug Co. vs.. Dereg ct al.-Mo-
ton for new trial; dismissed for want OF
prosecution; Judgment of dismissal.
Bailey vs. NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. mo-
ton for new trial; continued 20 June rs.
Nordrum et al. vs.. Perkins ct al.-Mo-
tion for new trial; oyerruled.
Davies & Hunter VS.. Chatfee--Defend-
ants demurrer 10 complaint; oyerrused.
uelvetia Mix Con. Co. VS.. A. f. Mac
Calsky co.--Motion 10 strike part OF
answer; submitted.
Bay View Brewing Co. rs. Winehill--
Demurrer 10 complaint; waived.
Morford VS.. Frye & Bruhn- Plaintiffs
motion for new trial; set for hearing June
Ii.
Iittell vs.. Miller ct al.--Dsfendsnt's mo-
ton TO retax costs; granted: continued to
June Is: permission 20 withdraw cost olls
by agreement of counsel
B@rmland et al. vs. Green. Erlfeh
Grass-Motion TO retax costs; granted
Williams ct a.. VS.. Pacific Manuisetur-
Ing Company and c. kupplsr-Demurrsr;
dismissed for want OF prosecution.
Paige Va. Cascade Fire and Marine In
surance COMPANY es aL-Motion Tor new
trial; set FOR hearing June Ia
Norton vs.. Portland Cracker Company
Motion to rsinstate: motion 70 strike;
granted; and for Judgment. overraied-
cL--ns,.r -. Narthera Pacific RAILWAY
Comnanv. motion for Judgment on plead
inss-Disfn.szed for want Of prosecution at
cost Of plaintiff
miss appeal: oyerruied-
Wopxtus vs. Snyder- Plaintiffs de-
nurrey 40 defendants answer; oveEraled
leave 70 amend complaint
ssewart vs. Mckinney ct A-peiena-
49,. demurrer 10 complaint; oyerr1led-
Globe TAilorin. Company VS. Duncan
Order of dismissal and Judgment tor costs
signed. .,., ys..
signed
WeIion rs. Davidson et 2i-nefsuit and
judEment ia sum of S-S2il.
schwahxcaer Bros. 4 Co vs. kockman
ct al.-Defaals Of l. RoekFnani slgned-
Willamette Caskes Company w. CoFhstt
et al.--Defauls Aaa Judgment against de-
PENDANTS, as foliag q heTE.An, $3.50
Matthias Rasley. 81: SAmuei hehoe. s1Ve;
Jahn NJ Whyts, SIS: kawRrd RUNNER,
s-i. 81, Joha III. swanson. Sis
s@astS~ TrAnsfsf Company vs. ~
y,,wl~s :, s...-se,,ier ef Jaae modified
0'ShsA et a. ~. CcRcannon--order Tor
writ 81 restitution; bond nxcd At s@1
Gilmore ~ Iynch e Ca asttncst3cn
o. snresies Ga defendants boads continued
unsa guns II
Fay va. Norshwssf Guarantee Loan and