The Washington times., 1894-04-05
IN HIGHER COURTS.

| COURT OF APPEALs-Present Chief Justice
| Alvey Shepard, and F. T. Bingham, Chief JUS
| tice Supreme Court of the District of Columbia
| Brindle NJ. 7. Norris sur partner; motion
to docket and dismiss submitted by NJ. j. Colbert:
granted. Washington Critic Weightman;
arguments by f. II. Thomas, \. S Worthington,
and w ID. Davidge for appellant; S. Maddox and
ii. T.. Davis for appellee. Assignments to-day on
hearing: Nos S. ls9. 2i3, ai5, a6a, and 2ss.
CIRCUIT, No /. Justice Bradley. NJ V. Pollard
VS. w c. p Breckinridge: same jury. Washing
ton Hydraulic Press Brick Company vs. Kirby
Il Bro; Judgment by default Washington
judgment by defsult Washington Hydraulic
Press Brick Company vs. II. II. Taylor: judgment
by default NJ. NJ Bane vs.. g. r.. Aiken ct al;
judgment by default. p. II. Sheely c. j.
Cassidy; judgment by default. j. F. Dyer .S
Company VS. Z. P. stohlman; Judgment by de-
| fault Saks & Company vs.. 7. W. Widdicombe;
Benedict vs. f. f. Cooper; judgment by default
A. ii. Bond VS.. ii. f. Van Deman ct al; Judgment
by default George ". Cochran VS.. 7. J. Hart;
judgment by default. G. w. Cochran VS. I. j.
Hart; judgment by default Moore Il Leding
vs. r. j. Mclean; judgment by default. Pitcher
& Manda vs.. N Studer: judgment by de-
fault Union Carriage and Wagon Company vs.
T. j. keliher ct al; judgment by default r. W.
i. Goff VS.. H. A. Singer ct al; judgment by de-
fault. Fritz La Rue and Sim VS.. j. Lansburgh:
judgment by default. Z. j. Smith eft al W.
II. Brinkley; judgment by default A. W. Nico-
demus VS. J. c. Fearson's Sons: judgment by de-
fault. United Secdrity Life Insurance and Trust
Company VS.. H. Twiley; afIirmance of justice of
peace judgment L. II. Meyers VS. Jackson-,Jones
Company; affirmance of justice of peace iudG-
ment. William b. Burk u Company VS.. H. W.
Christman; judgment by default. Courtland
Cart and Carriage Company VS.. +. G. Alexander;
judgment by default St Louis Type Foundry
VS.. c. Knoble; judgment by default j. l. Con-
way j. Lansburgh; judgment by default
Wrightsville Lime Company VS.. ". II. Cissel ct
a.; Judgment by default. j. Z. Smith A.
Derndinger; Judgment by default I. b. Harrison
vs. J. d. Free, !r; Judgment by default. W. E.
Matthews vs. +. j. Quinby ct al; judgment by
default William d. Campbell vs.. j. d. Gibbs;
Judgment by default Columbia Slate Company
vs. Huddleston Brothers: judgment by default
Mayer, Sons and Company vs.. o'Connell;
Judgment by default, Chr. Heurich Brewing
Company vs.. z. Il. Reynolds: judgment by de
fault NJ. L. Pool vs. Brodix Publishing COM
pany: judgment by default j. ii. Savlle VS.. j.
I. Cox, ct al; Judgment by default. j. Tunr-
bull, jr., and Company vs.. T. d. Singleton; iudg-
ment by default Maryland shoe Company VS.
G. Senge; Judgment by default. W. II. Host
man and ); Sons ysJ. Lans9urgh; Judgment by
Judgment by default
CIRCUIT, No. 2. Justice Cox-MarshaI returns
sixteen names Assignments to-day--Tague
Matthews, Nugent VS.. Baltimore and Potomac
Company, Noyes VS. McMichael, Mullan VS. Baum
McCann vs. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Com
pany, Fyler Pennsylvania Railroad Com
pany, johnson VS.. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad
Company, Donahue VS.. Washington ana George
town Railroad Company, Huysman VS.. Huys-
man, and Meugel Il Company Chase.
EQUITY, No. ], Cox, Justice. No assignment
Moran VS.. Sullivan; testimony ordered taken in
seventy-five days. Moran VS. DAILY: testimony
ordered taken in seventy-five days. Cook VS.,
Merchant; demurrer sustained, with leave to
amend Newman VS. Jones; pro confesso VS.
defendant, Lille ID. Jones, granted. Newman VS.
Mackall: pro confeSso vs.. defendant, j. l. Cannon,
granted. Central Trust Company Washing
ton and Arlington Railway Company; petition of
trustee denied without prejudice. In re Mary Z.
Gates a lunatic; Helen Gates appointed commit
tee Howlngs VS.. PLACER; G. Dyer and j W.
Compton allowed to intervene. Compton VS..
Halpn; pro confesso VS. certain defendants
ordered Martin VS.. Martin; defendant de-
clared in contempt of court. No assignment
EQUITY, No. ., Hagner, Justice-Clark ct al. VS..
Dodge ct al; appearance of absent defendant
ordered. Bell Electric Light Company VS. Gill
bert; order finally ratifying sale and reference
to auditor. Blair VS.. Alexander ct al: appear
ance of absent defendants ordered. Lewis vs.
Lewis; testimony before X. Z. Lee. jr., executor,
ordered taken. Croxton VS.. Croxton; testimony
before William Ward Mohun, executor, ordered
taken. Bateman vs.. Plumb ct al: appearance
OF absent defendants ordered. White vs. Wilson
ct al; order dissolving Injunction. Barker VS..
Penn ct al; order reviewing suit in executrix.
Lewis VS.. Lewis; order for commission to issue.
Cannon vs.. Cannon; rule TO show cause return
able April II, 1891 Page vernillon ct al;
Henry C. Porter appointed guardian ad Item
Assignments to-day: Nos 45, As, 49, So 81, so, 50,
81, 50, and So.
Ella Braxton, housebreaking; defendant pleads
not guilty. United States VS. H. C. Hoverter,
false pretense: defendant pleads not guilty
United States vs.. Milton +. Chamberlain, assault
and battery: sentenced to District jail ninety
days from March 30 United States VS.. Fred c.
Ainsworth, manslaughter; pleads not guilty to
Indictment in Fords theater case; recognizance
5000 taken: Osceola c. Green. Peter f. Bacon,
Frank Hume, and W., II. Hoeke, sureties; Maj
Buttcrworth retained as counsel for defendant:
trial set for Saturday United States vs. George
Thomas; defendant surrendered by surety:
verdict not guilty; defendant discharged