The Daily bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Hawaii]) 1882-1895, 1894-02-08
Continued from Ist Pdge.)


stood, he had no objection on that ac-
count.
How positive is your recollection in re-
gard to the Seattle loss? A. Well, il is
about as positive as the other one in re-
gard to the Union Iron Works.
What was the loss in Seattle? A. l
could not tell: IL seems to me in one case
il was about S4ONI, and in the other,
$1,000.
Have You heard those mentioned later
by Mr.. Allen. A. don't know that /
have: don't remember having heard
them.
Have you heard him say whether or
not you have not held some discussion?
A. II seems to me 1 saw the figures
afterwards in the Library. think | saw
Mr.. Magoon and Mr.. Banning once look
ing over the inventory, and am not sure
but that saw it in that.
When you speak Of the inventory do
You mean schedule G.! A. No, l think
the inventory is the entire list Of proper.
ties.
Ia there any such list on record that
you know Of! A. There Is none here.
Or in the record of the estatcg A.
am not sure whether that one that Mr.
Magoon had was an inventory filed at
some former accounting or not.
II was an inventory in the hands Of Mr..
Magoon! A. In the hands Of Mr.
Magoon, and Mr.. Banning. who had the
proceedings papers in the case. he had
quite bundle Of papers.
Now don't you think that you have
confused the question OF time about
Seattle loss, don't you think you have
confused the time when you learned Of
it! A. don't think 30.
When YOU asked Mr. Banning IL he
had looked through the inventory and
account. to what did you refery A. I
referred TO nothing myself in particular.
but asked him the general question il he
had been through the accounts of Mr..
Allen. think in his office. or wherever
IL was. don't know M / specified the
place, but IL he had been through the ac.
counts and was satisfied with them, and
then ] think Mr.. Allen spoke of these
two instances, and | questioned Mr.. Ban.
ming and he said that was understood, he
had no objection on that account.
Did you notice that in schedule e
that schedule & IL referred TO ~ contain.
ing n full true and exact list Of the pro.
perry that IL now left In the hands Of the
administrator: did you notice that there
was no list 81 investments in schedule &:
\. don't remember how that was,
don't remember whether there was any
on file or whether Mr.. Allen had some
present, or whether there was any at all.
Did You nj that hearing see any list 81
Investments: A. / cannot say that /
did at the hearing, but on the other hand
| would not bc positive that did not.
saw that list in the Library.
Were you aware at the time OF that
hearing that the were You aware nj any
time prior to signing the order that the
summary Of investments included in
schedule { did not include $3.50 invested
in Seattle bondsy A. No.
What was your belief nj the time on
that point. nj the time that you signed
the order: A. l supposed everything
was included.
signing the order M to whether or not
half, and the receipts given by Mrs. Ban.
ming for her hail. included the Seattle
bonds! \. suppose TINT they did.
Did you know what the half consisted
Of, the half that Banning rcceiptcd for?
A.. That is how they divided them up?
Yes, sir. A. No.
y. -
WI A., -, +. ,.
y. "e'' ''' ''' H'" " WIS '"n'' ~
vi
was .i'crt nn! question. ra'Sei before
s ou Us 70 "nc'hcr or NOT banning WIS
. ,n.,."' 20 h,s nun w none! OF invest
nieu'S, was .hnt question: r"'s'n peiore
,p", useusSeu' u H., NJ "! So"Ise
s ,",. Mus w. opp9s'.on ,ilcrc u. III one
va; y, WY o .h Wv parties were repre-,
H. n ,aa. a'n ,"e! re''''e' w ut nsrr,u ~
,ne i ,aesS anu "R'e''' III !" what Sho''"
w ao,e' ,,,.u ,u,
4, ~ YOU ic. I'm. y. 'ha. .nr, a'Ieh SIh..u
W Lns IouI' ,nn' 'heIe Was loss on tie
I ma ~, iron moihS oonns' ~ re-, n'r;
,,a na you ha.e any impression or ,Hlie.
NE, . Us 70 Wi'e.,'r vi not uiu you KNOW W
.llnl .i'he OF oehcve W tliht 'inie 'hnt mat
We. wy nisa ", 1, lhn' luo eo'n'
, W ,a' ' ., ao"l, ~ any sucii invest.
','e"ii ~ Jar W. NV VI Tvs recoruT SNOW
- ,ha , no IN, ,'i,'I, a w W aS 10
n III u'". mater '"''' "'s' oc'ore the
Tpa So",.
h. H. "'ue' tn"' Mnn siehcu rec,,es 'hn'
ina , ai"a Us .ne n,n'inlS'ra'pr, mas COZ,
~ w. sums MhoMh VI peneweu y
nun " oe uue VI Whic. c'lh pe coiiec.ed'
"% you rchienper whe'her any PROOF was
'" WS. on 'ha. POM: q. NO
". ,s !SHI IMPRESSION IN 20 Wheller
tT J"n, I'LL ,, W, , una' pom. VI not
~