The morning call., 1893-09-06

the Geary law other than its section D..
The distinction thus attempted to be
drawn between the different Otfenses de-
nounced by the statute is. in my Judgment.
without authority of law, and my sense OF
duty obliges ME tosdisregard II.
Congress made no such distinction in
making, as it did. al appropriation for the
enforcement of the provisions OF the Geary
act in the act of August 5. 1892. entitled
An act making appropriations for sunday
civil expenses of the Government for the
fiscal year ending June 80 1898, ana for
other purposes and in making similar
appropriation for the same purpose in the
act of March 3, 1898, entitled An act max
ing appropriations for sundry civil ex-
penses of the Government for the fiscal
year ending June 80, 1894, and for other
purposes.
"The provision first referred to is found
in the United States Statutes at Large,
1S91-1893, page 365, and is as follows: En-
forcement of the Chimes exclusion act
to prevent the unlawful entry of Chinese
into the United States, by the appointment
of suitable officers to enforce tho laws In
relation thereto. and for the expenses OF
returning TO China all Chinese persons
found to be unlawfully in the United
States. including the cost of Imprisonment
and the actual expense of the conveyance
OF Chinese persons to the frontier or sea-
board foT deportation, and for enforcing
the provisions of the act approved May 5,
1892, IAN act 10 prohibit the coming OF
Chinese persons into the United States
S100, ZOO" -
And the appropriation for the fisca
year ending June 80, 1884, is found in the
same volume. pages $50 and $50. and is
follows: Enforcement of the Chinese ex,
clusioD act; to prevent the unlawful en-.
try OF Chinese into the United States
by the appointment of suitable Off
GERS to enforce the laws in rela
ton thereto. and for the expenses OF
returning to China all Chinese person:
found 10 be unlawfully in the United
States, including the cost of Imprisonment
and the actual expense of the conveyance
OF Chinese persons TO the frontier or sea-
board Tor deportation. and for enforcing
the provisions of the act approved May 3
1892, entitled an Act TO prohibit the com
ing of Chinese persons in the United
States" $4,000 together with the unex
! pended balance OF the appropriation fol
this purpose for the fiscal year 1888
The evidence in the case showing that
the defendant is and was at the time o1
the passage of the Geary act a Chinese
laborer residing il this State. and that he
failed TO register in accordance with the
/ provisions of the sixth section of that ct
and mo excuse therefor being attempted
/ to be shown, there will be findings accord
| ingy, and an order that he be 6epOrled.
The opinion is praised on all hands, anC
/ applications for over one hundred war
rants were made this morning.
! PORTLAND. Or, Sept. 5.-The hopfieId,
at Buttevlile, twenty-nine miles south o.
this city, were the scene of a Chinese evic
/ ton yesterday. About a hundred white
men herded uD ffty-six Chinese hop.
! pickeTs, drove them 10 the dock. ana
forced the captain of steamer to Drinl
! them TO this city. There are about five
| hundred more Chinese around ButtevIile
in the h0pields, and more trouble may
| follow