The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1893-12-02
MRS. LANGLEY SUES AGAIN.
4 FRESH SET or CHARGEs AGIINsT
HER MILLIOyIIRE BUSBiND.

Five Cores on dents to Be brought tn-One
suit tor Absolute Divorce aud O,e Tor
Separation Denin'S from W.. i.anE ey.
Mrs. Mara Belle Langley. hosued her hus.
hand. Millionaire w H. Langley. for absolute
divorce last spring and was defeated has
brought another suit against him Tor absolute
divorce in the supreme Court in Brooklyn. and
also one for separation Since the trial u tho
first suit attempts havo been made To- effect n
settlement OF tho difficulties between Mr..
langley and lis WIFE, but they have failed.
The first public announcement Of the renewal
Of Mrs. langcy's suit was made Yesterday.
when her counsel. eN. Judge George q. Eey-
nolds appeared before Justice Smith in the
supreme Court and made application FOR ali
mony and counsel fec.
Mrs. Langleys complaint accuses her hus-
band OF misconduct ut times between tho
beginning Of 1870 and July. 1873. These
places are designated ns the scenes OF the
alleged misconduct hotel in sixth ave-
nue.. the Eastern Hotel the tinted States Ito.
tel, the Grand View Hotel. Saratoga: the de-
PENDANTS yacht Comet. the Hotel Urawbridge.
Atlantic Highlands. According to the plaintiff
Mr. Langley is worth .SAOUOOOO or more.
Since their separation until March. 1888 tho
defendant placed $1,000 "A month ut the dispo-
sal OF his wife for her support and that Of their
three children. Since the date named he has
made no provision for her support hut. It IL
asserted. has oCn spending his money on fast
horses. last yaclits. ana last friends Tho
complaint named the cu-rcsI ondent who Is
said to have ilEured in the yacht episode. but
the name was not made public. The names of
tn" other correspondents are not given, and
their absence was thus explained by oX-Judge
REYNOLDS
The plaintiff has positive proof OF tho ale
cations 81 the complaint, but does not intend
to make known the names OF the correspond
ents, as rast experience has taught her to pre-.
vent. ii possible. having her witnesses tam
pcred with
EX-ludGc Truav. who 10 associate with Jus
tice-elcct w ). Gaynor in the defence pre-
acnted in reply to tn" onlplaint an affidavit
10y Mr. Langley denying nil the new nilegn-
tiuns. Tho affidavit sets forth that the plain
till refused to occupy the Sl25uOO rcsidence
which he had lifted M for her at 81 Picrreront
street. BIuok IN, and insisted on going to live
with her father aud sister In Westrhester
county and taxing th" children with her.
she IL mover happy the defendant says.
disgrace herself. her children. or her hus-
band
Specific tcninls are made ~ the charges 81
misconduct John kcmr the defendants
valet eweurs that the Young lady named ns
having been on hoard tho yacht Comet was
brother. MIR. TruHN explained that no AFFIDAVIT
had been made by the young lady herself be-
cause she wss in Washington.
In response TO this cN-Judge Reynolds said
Friday Mr.. Langley admits that his income
amounts to SliO.OOU u yeHr. Discussion on tho
question OF almOny and counsel fees was re-
served hy Judge smith
II is said that the testimony in the present
suit will be more substantial than that given
most part will be private detectives who have
been watching MIR. Langley.