New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1893-01-29
COLONEL SINN'S LIUNTIT
I. III SUING MS WIFE TOR DIVORCE OK bEI\OH
- CONTRACT

I. III SUNG MS WIFE TOR DIVORCE or bil.\'H
~ CONTRACT
4 case Is ON the calendar Of the Cy Court. a.
Ir,oklyn in which & lionel William l.. Sinh ii'
theatre manager. Is the pianif ia - 'u ae"in'' ia
WIFE. who I, lnown on IN aiaSe q, Ne fora l''
n.r ani il Will come 30 iriai ca'ly neat moAth LOU
The partlr, To the ,n lnl their coun'. d"clh'd N''
yrday la sag ANYTHING definite IN regard 10 the cd'-'
81, action but II /, believed TO have grown on oi i'
strained relations between Colonel sim. who i man
sg., 81 The Rro.klyn lark 1hc;'r', ana lis vic
Ih.y hay, lived apart since a,i sumner. II was r"
por led I'm the full that they were seeking seP'''"h
and Mr., Sims mother said that IL Wa cas-" Il "''l
incompn hiity aud :bat her dnup inter- was oN "0pN'
L,U th, NE. Of hrr husband. and their ideas anh
sympathles wholly apart II was 'hih ih'' 'h'
rbcic. Of PLAYS In which NI,S Tanner has appeared
was controlled by her husband Nho was her hal'S'r'
and ii, blamed him for non success. Colonel SIM
denied thut m. and his wife separated. and ed
Tim, her HON, was with him. although she Was
IRA, eninc IN The W 4. When she Returned 10 bEo"N'
lvu howry.r size did not 20 tn hi house. IN" has
not appeared upon III" stage this sf's H. ler i"''
plny Husband and WIFE, was not successful
colonel sim declined positively yesterday 20 say
ANYTHING about the Ia advance o. IL coming III
eonri Ills counsel In ~" case Is Thomas H. iroN'
Mr. Troy admitted tia, IL, suit was not for dlVoir''
lu. r.f ..d 10 say anything morr ABOUT II. MT
SIMS attorney Of record Is Robert Griffin VINO iAN h-
orir. with Colonel Robert g. lnsria'li "a ~" ~ >'
.,uAt New YORK; liz, admit that h" ar" ny
III. answer I'm the case bat h" said Colonel myers IL
vas course. colonel lng'rson j. row in tA" W'- ""'
Will rcnin ihl, week " g..
walter r. Inn. son ~ CoonI -n1 ''I ''' j.
had Lrcn decided 10 .ay nothing abor ia ease O"
II came 70 trial. II wa l"To''l matter "n" Va :
not NOT rrntc - the parties pi''>' '"'H' - 81
woud h, hcpr quiet a~ long . p'''''i''
one sipposion that the cas- WIS one '"'
lrcnc,, IL contract Colonel sim ha, been hN'"'1'
far NJ. Tanner for a number "i years, an" ~ i'i ~
,nn, c.pa,Ify before hc married li. N"c ~,
III, ,nt no in IA contract with III, VIC H' ''''"
s"Jorci Siiu.S mrs. wifi. secured di'or.' ii"i nm
- Dozen YEAR aro Aui Il 1, lrs, imn lHli il'' u.c
Inc. be married M,~ Tanner. j." ilh',n'. ~ a.
I'D. yesterday That the Suit might be trough ~
nnuul thc later marfilgr "n M" Ei""Iu '"', ."'
mm. ,act NJ legal right To marry GA me Plil 81"
our ID The couple. y friend OF Nho'i sun 49, o
,I,r, invalid when OF tllr PHti'r - h i"' ~
richt a. marry. Til, might br nu' u" w, a.
,hat mn nudivorced husband or VII" WI INV %
r,r other r.a,ons. ana The aci> nH' hNr n'.u a..
Known f., the person ai;c'ici. VINO iL't INV NM
'',I, assumed ti,,. the rlgpt 20 - .un" VIM u .,
on sSx,"t,uI do not say that ihlS = thr raSon
,'r No. ,r,Iou Of colonel SLIM a;in,l ~ "'' "oi
do | sny that II is not the r"A'o; It'll for ,,i,l
If T. expected that the cas- VIII ~ ''''' ''' '
On The first Monday OF IchHit2.