The sun., 1893-06-27
LAWYER SALTER A WITNESS.
HE, roo, UNhBLE TO REMEMBER WHERE
MRS, POLLOCK,S CHILD BOARDED.

lRS POLLOCh'S CHILD BOdhD1N.
NaO % Month Enoueb for fits RIch Clients
Daughter-in-Isw-M Money to Lend to Young
Poiiock-The Dakota Divorce Ruled Ont.
Whom tho trial Of Mrs. Ellen Pollock's suit
for 5000 damages a. gainst her iather-in-la".
Alexander Pollock. wa Nresunled before Judge
Pryor In Part II. Of the Court OF Common
Pleas yesterday morning the crowd OF specta-
tors was as large as 1t has bccn on any day
since the case was opened W. ii. Salter.
brother Of tho defendants attorney and conn-
Dental adviser. and tho inan who did most OF
the dsagreeablo work connected with the tax
ing away OF Mrs Pollock S child two years ago.
resumed his place IN the witness chair. and
was turned over to the tender mercies OF Col.
James. But Mr.. Salter's memory had not inn
Irovcd, and Col Jamcs was unable to get
from him any information concerning tho
family with which lttlo Annie Pollock was
placed to board by Edward Pollock. Mr. Thain
then called Lawyer A. q. Saltor Mr.. Pollock's
attorney, and also one OF the counsel in tho
present case
Mr. Sater Is n man OF rodium height with
iron Ecay hair and bIstlinG black eyebrows
md mous,achc His complexion is salow and
he has hii; lumps nil over his free. Like every
witness presented by thn defence. lie stam-
mered and hesatcd about answering Aues-
tons. and moro than once coutralicted him
self aud other Witnesses. lie told Of his first
knowledge of Edward Iol!ock's marriage to
the Ilaintin and GaNo AN account of his con-
neGi!on with tho ease; ,-
cnthe witness ne he had on tho elder Pollock
and tried to get him to say lie hnd known OF
the marriage OF til" two young people az early |
as, 1880. AS an rNnmll" oi the ACCURACY, oE
EATERS answers tho following is given: Col. |
le!ISsh; 6S som.,jm. jr tho ,,u Of ,syo." WA. tho
j. "Nhat time do you mean in the fall OF 1S0O?" |
persisted Col. james.
Well. In tho latter part of july or in Au-
= gust" confess"d the witness.
snlter told OF a call ne made on 3lrs. Pollock
in 'ai the way more % s'H TS T SrI for her
Col. james mad,' him state how scnntily the
G hS rSh wan nsss "
rug. n bed. stove. table, and three chairs
tSnlter then asserted that th" woman; in adii-
husband give her so n week TO support her
self and the two children. Satsr Thought $50
ofnossession letters and kilograms sent to Mrs.
Pollock 10y her husband. Tho womans counsel
mad 10 take leIal action to get them back Il
Witness gave his version of the Hotel Royal
interview. and denied haNina offered the poor |
woW2n W, ton cents to return home with
Why. iieay gave yon credit for Generosity
Thich y2u u'd not deserve! calculated Col. |
!, salter admitted hc, had seen Mrs. Pollock u
aHr r aSSa 2Ens uS her rf
he had been ILL., lie % could i, not ,ememeer
Wnctner ne hnd actually been III or not.
have not been sick for forty years." he |
added as nm explanation.
Well, you will he. soon." replied Col. James
The story Of bow Mrs. M; Pollock was deprived
OF her child was again, gone, over. and Saiter
was forced to tell all lie had to do with it. TO |
the best of Salter's recollection the name signed |
to the reception the chqs board was Frazer.
or Fraser. or Frashcr.. or Frasier.
Don't YOU know" exclaimed Col. James, |
THAT IL this Frazer woman's address were !
known, she would be subpUnaed here as
Yes" said Salter with a smile. 81 told that
to Edward POLLOCK only forty-eight hours
The Witness then described IN interview
with Mrs. Armour. neighbOr OF Mrs Pol
locks. and dcnied having said that Mr.. Alex
ANGER Pollock .wan.od TO keen the plaintiffs
child 80 as to adopt her and marry her OIL to
rich man. Mrs. Armour. when nut on tho
stand In rebutta. testified in direct opposition
As to the trip to Dakota. where Edward Pol
locks alleged divorce WAS obtained, Salter ad-
mitted snllenly that Alexander Pollock had
aid al his exkenses out there and his, trayel- :
said he took only his word for 1t, but that
would be good some day
Mhen LAWYER Thain tried to offer the Da-
Jared ur and said it would not be admitted in |
the |o, case e, , on any y conceivable grounds
smonc noI 1nhes tbsss then called sev,Ea Witnesses
the nSlnltEs r aunt in 9ebu1al Of sasrs tes
NM IN told her the reason he married the plain
fiT tilh was because she was such good faith
Iui girl. who bad always taken such good care {
Of his nother's Jewels and diamonds"
Mrs Ellen Poll ock took the stand in rebuttal .
That 1 had been brought up by the defence
Then both sides rested. and Judge Pryor nd | .
journed the court until II o'clock this mora
ing when the summing up will begin. |
n