Wood River times. [volume] (Hailey, Idaho) 1882-1915, 1893-04-01

Bfuner q Parsons; said she thong h,
they did not treat her right.
Miss Huntsmsn c. ming in DR..
Higgins objected to her remaining IN
the courtroom. He stated his reasons
for tits.
+. NJ. Bruner said he was not en-
gagged in this CASE; bu, he could quo .
the rule excluding witnesses. The
off-r was not accepted.
The witn+ss was thereupon ex.
clu1ed.
Mr.. Cunn,ngham's crosse xamina>
ton resumed: She never mentioned
the name of Mr.. Bruner or M. Par.
sons. other than in connection with
This mining deal. In that she seemed
to think they had taken advantage OF
her.
r. K. Estill, NJ. D.. OF Bellevue,
eIiritei the above replies by questions
| DIR Estill sworn to act in the case
AS required.
DR.. Higgins sworn: Examined the
defendant because he was summoned
understands is part of the court !;
DIES not understand he il here ~ ex.
pert.
Section 7G9 of the code quoted ss
authority Tor sun'moning DR.. Higgins.
DR.. F'vqins: First heard Of this
case Thursday, March 80, from the
sheriff OF his deputy; at home; was
suhp~"@d to appear forthwith; came
directly to this courtroom; that after
noon; WAS present when Clint. Angel.
Erv. W Johnson, John r. Hart, H.
Cramer, Z. D. Saunders, P. NJ.
t5runrr, Ida Hun,sm.n, aud the de-
PENDANT were s"or, heard the testi
| ""v k'V's "uo "iu Hot I~Au II,
hence does not know that thu r cord
is tull or correct; knows IL it is the
record, it is not full. Examination
lasted until about 4o'rlock last Thurs.
day. At.r the examination spike
about the ease, first 10 Clinton Angel;
c3nn"t recall rnoth+r; believes it y \.
in the .heriT's niIic-; believes Mr.
Saunders was present.; has written
"u. part of his r. port; does no, h-.
lirvr Il could be changed by violence
for this reas"n-her name, place oi
birth, residence, personal description
being mostly obtained from herself,
cannot he changed by wit SIS This
Is her first attack; defendant was
never before committed on cLarp e
OF INSANITY; cause Of insanity remains
T." he answered; there Is no INSANITY
in defendants ancestry.
i Bevond this point witness had NO,
examined defendant. Answers to ties,
questions usual in such cases must de-
pend on evidence to he submitted.
Reading from Clinton Anrelstesti-
mony: She had u wild look in her
-ves-a murdercus expression" DR..
Higgins said he had looked ut Mrs,
Johns eyes. But he would not give
a certificate OF insanity on such testi
nony.
Il. Van Ness sworn: Is a drug.
gist; has known Mrs. johns for six or
Sven years-five or xix, anyway; me,
her quite fr.qu' My iurine that time /;
>he came to the 1ru, store several
times; never had any conversation
with her except those arising from
ord nary business Transactions; saw
her on the streets; never, st any time,
believed the woman insane; never
saw anything In her actions or Ian.
suage that would lead him to believe
her insane; only one time; never saw
~ murdereus, wild look in her e,-."
Cross examineh: Noticed some.
thing strange with her once; witness
,hn"ks it WAS last Sunday night; she
CANE to get medicine for her hor.e:
sh. said her horse WAS very sick: she
seemed to he much excited, and .ai.
she thought her horse had been poi
soned; after hearing how the horse
aet-d witness did not think i, was
n"isoned. aud gave her some medi,
cine that, he said, would make the