The united opinion. [volume] (Bradford, Vt.) 1881-1970, 1893-01-20
Orange County Court, Dec.
Term, 1892.

N. \
SALMON b. HEBARD, Clerk.
CHARLES f. SMITH, Sheriff.
GEORGE l.. STOW, States Atty
JOHN ii. MIMMs, Reporter
THURSDAY, JAN. IL.
No. 227. State v. Richard Kennedy.
| This case was argued to-day as mentioned
last week and was given to the jury about
| 3 o'clock and they returned q verdict of
mot guilty in short time, much to the
surprise of many of the Chelsea people.
Harvey for the defence, States Attorney
| for the State
No. 228. State v. Charles G. Aldrich was
next TAX up. This was an indictment
| for depoStlng poison on respondents own
land not for any legitimate purpose, such
as destroying insects destructive to vegeta
ton. The trial lasted until Saturday morn
| ing when the jury returned a verdict of
'not guilty" Stowe, States Attorney for
the prosecution, Harvey for the defence.
give the cases disposed of by the cour. in
their order upon the docket without re-
gard to the time when they were heard, as
many OF them were heard evenings. Most
| of those not here mentioned were continued
No. 35. Sarah A. f, Walton aaminis-
tratrlX V. estate of Electa Hal. Appeal
from the probate court of the Randolph dis
trict upon its disallowance of plant frs
claim against the defendant. Hon. Frank
! Plumley commissioner and referee. AT
the last term of court an order was made
that the plaintiff procure and file the report
OF the referee at this term of court or suffer
a non-suit. The plaintiff was not able to
do this and at this term she moved for a
continuance on the ground that for acct
dents beyond her control she was unable to
procure report. The motion was heard
Tuesday, Jan. 18th, on affidavits and the
report of the master as to the question of
continuance, and the court granted the mo-
tInD of 70 nj Orda of
report be filed TIE next term or nonsuit.
Farnham and Hyde for plaintiff, Tarbell
and ID. G. Denison for the defendant.
No. AZ Samuel o. Ordway, administra-
tor, V: Orvis P. Cilley apt Action of debt.
The death of the defendant is suggested
and the case is discontinued by the appoint
ment Of commissioners upon his estate who
can adjust the claim. DeniSon for plain
tiff, Tarbell tor defendant.
No. 81. Charles Parker v. j. 5. Warden
and trustee. Action of assumpsit Dis
continued as to defendant. Trustee dis
Pingree for defendant, Watson for trustee.
No. liz. Newell c. Wright " Abel M.
Weeks and Bradford Savings Bank and
Trust Co., trustee. Action of assumpsit.
Referred to s. B. Hebard by agreement.
Heard Dec, Both, on exceptions to one item
the exceptions and rendered Judgment for
the plaintiff to recover the larger sum
named in the report, to wit: $296.89 and
costs to be added. The trustee disclosed
that there was IN It's hands S306.00 for
which sum judgment was rendered less
the trustees costs to be taxed. The de-
PENDANT excepted to the judgment of the
court in allowing the disputed item and
cause is on its way to the Supreme court,
Farnham for plaintiff Dickey for defend
ant.
No. 49, First National Bank of Chelsea
V. j. G.. Fits. Action of trover. Heard on
report. S. G. Shurtletf referee. Left with
the court by agreement for judgment as Of
this term. Emery, Tarbell and Darling
for plaintiff, Dickey for defendant.
No. 49, First National Bank of Chelsea
v. II. NJ Miller and j. G. Fits. Replevin
Same referee and same proceedings as in
No. 118. Same counsel with addition Of
Watson for defendant.
No. 12l. Sarah Perkins V. Henry D. Per
kins. Petition fordivorce, which is grant
ed for intolerable severity, Custody o.
minor child given to the re- mother With thu
er. No counsel for the defence.
No. Isl. Holman q HerrIck V. NJ. E. &
o. M. Allen, apt. Action on the case
This case stood on the jury list and was sci
mot for jury by the plaintiff the first day
of the term. On motion of the plaintiff fol
continuance it was granted on the terms
that the plaintiff pay the defendant 500
within 30 days of the adjournment Of court
or suffer nonsult Boyden Tor plalntlf,
Daring Tor defendant
NO. l6l. duncan n. Mckay v; IL. u,
Daring; Actlon OF assulnpSlt. REFERRED
to ). b, HeDard by agreement report
MED and exceptions hled. Judgment on
the report pro J0fnl0 by agreement and
without nearing that plalntln recover
$92909 ana costs. Exceptions by the de,
PENDANT are allowed ana the cause IS passed
TO the Supreme Court. Smith q Sloan and
Harvey Tor defendant, Dunnett Tor de-
tendant,
NO. 100 william Oraggy, H. v. Aislna
Cragsy; retltlo or. Ior 1 II W S l.
Slail. n III ue'ei'iu' ii"i'o1 iol Pe'r
Ii0ner ,oo rob, uou.,,ou Aua,,u II
NJ. loS. JoIIh h 1Ttt y, AItilGr e; ~
DaE IiS Setvle4 a. lee echett loI Pialhtlll'
olson f0o SloIi III ny 1it Nan.
Ci NO lso Plallh w, G;Iosstoh ", May e. ~
GSloSSton DecLGe l 81 uiNGtte SiahVeu lol
ueSeI1 l 'na Dal LlnS iol Pet W! w
NJ ~. ooP ,I SI "a " IiliiJt "; war
zen! zen LauIiop anu Ma Ma T.. duat ~ &C
tloll vi eJecIlLIeuI. nt tUW e VI F9IslIlIe
Is cltea IN IN any appears 10 uelenG. IN mo
Ioll vi tlle ueISlludlIs tllG case 10
on t 51 o Terms Lnat GelehGa4t pay tG pail
IilI 9I.UO. "hlte Ior pIalnul1' Earning loi
ueIeuudnJ.