Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1893-04-02
LEGAL DECISIONS,
A LARGE NUMBER OF CASES
DISPOSED or
In The Seventeenth District Court But the
End Is Nsar--A Big Batch Of New
suIis FIled-HrleIs

Judge Harris of the Seventeenth dis
triCt court still continues his clearing
out process and disposed Of large mum
Der of cases yesterday both on the, motion
and non-jury dockets. The following are
the motions disposed Of,
John $. 1fiplett W.. Howard & Cleve-
land motion TO reinstate; motion sus-
tained
Germania Building and Loan associn.
| ton vs.. Clay HarpOld, motion for new
trial: .overrulcd and defendant excerpts.
Beckie Oliver vs.. George Oliver, motion
for cost; sustained
Charles Robinson vs. r. u. Maddox,
motion for cost; sustained
Boswell vs.. Boswell, motion 10 rem
state: sustined.
b. Q. Evans company vs.. Josie Belmont
ct al, defendants motion for new trial;
| oYerruled.
international Trust company Of Boston
vs.. ~. u. Chase et al. motion 10 appoint
an auditor; sustained and Paul Wash
burn appointed auditor.
Fort Worth and Utica Trustgcompany
/ VS.. Fort Worth lnstalmeut company,
motion TO quash attachment writ; con-
| tinued by consent.
William Mckenzie vs.. ]. Y Light ct
al. motion against sheriff of Cooke
county; continued without prejudice.
q. w. Blnndin VS. w. j. Hunter
motion by plaintiff for new trial; over
| ruled aud plaintiff excerpts.
z. NJ, C0rb Ct al. VS.. Western Union
| Telegraph company, plaintiffs motion for
a new trial oyerruled and plmnuh eI-
cepts
Weir Pillow company VS.. L. W. Armen.
| trout, to qunsh attachment writ; contin-
| ued.
Thomas worthington vs.. North Side
| Street Railway company, receivers appl-
cation to cease operating the Calhoun
street line; continued.
| Thomas Worthington vs.. North Side
| Street Railway company ct al, motion 70
| require Loan and Trust company TO pay
| over money; continued without prejudice.
George Hally ct al. vs.. j. IL. johnson
| &C al; defendants motion for new trial.
| oyerruled and defendant excerpts and
| gives notice Of appeal.
| The cases disposed of on the nOn-jury
/ docket were the following:
| Charles Robson VS. H. 10. Maddox;
continued for cost bond
Bessie H. Guthrie vs.. y. II. Guthrie;
| same disposition.
Charles Scheuber vs.. John III. Lewis
ct al: continued for service.
John g. Harrison vs.. 5. M. Baker
| ct al; continued by consent.
George Bess VI. Thomas Il. Mccall;
continued for service.
j. NJ. Huntingdon ct al. vs.. ]. w. Scheu-
Der; dismissed for want of prosecution.
| Kate Wagner W.. Charles Wagner:
| Judgment for divorce on the ground Of
abandonment.
NJ. j. Ledderer vs.. William Leddcrer,
divorce; taken under adyisement
| Miss llbhie Uolhert vs.. Guy j. Price,
debt and foreclosure; judgment for S402
j. y. Bryan vs. N. Harding (receiver),
damages; judgment for defendant.
City National bank vs.. Il. l.. Burnett
judgment for defendant.
| TeXarkana Furniture company vs.
Fort Worth Instalment company; judg-
ment for plaintiff for S101.55.
j. 10. FLEMING vs.. Ester Fleming di-
yorce; refused.
10. 3. Daggett vs.. Thomas Clark; con-
unued by consent us
john i. Camp ct al VS.. Zook 4 odom;
contiued by consent. ..
Emil Rebecca vs.. Tony Reeder, Sian
der; continued by consent.
Becky Oliver VS.. George Oliver, d.
vorce; granted.
Lilly Dickson VS.. Andrew Dickson d.
yoree; continued by consent.
This court viii adjourn Monday and
the new term will commence April TO-
FORTY EIGHTH DISTRICT.
Collins and Brantly VS. w Il. Lake,
debt; dismissed for want OF prosecu-
ton
NJ. NJ. Harden vs. Gulf Colorado and
Santa Fe railway, damages; continued
by consent.
Frank Cunningham vs.. Gulf. Colorado
and Santa Fe railway, damages COntin-
ued by plaintiff for want Of testimony
of DR. Stephens.
At noon the jury went out on the case
of j. w. Greed VS.. the city of Fort
Worth. Il suit for personal injuries sus-
tanned by Mrs Greed, by falling down an
embankment, which was continued from
the previous day, and had not returned
Il verdict at a late hour.
NEW SUITS FILED.
w. Il. Hull, assignee, vs.. II. w. Tay-
lor; suit for debt,
Western Mortgage and Investment
company VS.. #. M. Mullins ct al; debt
and foreclosure.
w. l.. Hall, assignee VS.. j G.. Brugler;
debt
Western Mortgage and Investment
company VS., Mont Riley ct al; debt
and foreclosure
J. w. Nelson vs. IL. p. Ledbetter;
debt and foreclosure.
City National bank Of Quanah VS..
A. j. DiXson, defendant, G.. w. Arm
strong, garnishee; garnishment after
Judgment
Mrs. NJ. o. Spear administrative, vs..
Il. y COtter ct al; sequestration.
Il. NJ MARBLE vs.. City National bank
Of Quanah ct al. Injunction.
-------o------
MAY QUEEN.