The Hawaiian gazette. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1865-1918, 1893-03-21
SUPREME COURT.
Calendar of Gases for the March
Term, 1893.

The Queen VS.. NJ. G. San Tana, vio-
lating liquor law; appeal from May
term, Third Circuit. Neumann for
defendant.
Ono luke VS.. R. w. Holt, submits
sion of controversy under the code.
Ashford for plaintiff, G. Brown for
defendant.
George Dillingham; VS.. Hawaiian
Government, trespass on the case;
exceptions from October term, First
Circuit. Thurston for plaintiff, Crelgh-
ton for defendant-appellant.
Egan & Gum VS.. Z. NJ. Brewer and
| others, trespass on the case; excep-
tions from October term, First Circuit.
Peterson for plaintiff, Hartwell for
defendants-appellant.
A. NJ. Mellis VS.. A. K. Kunuiakea,
assumpsit; appeal from Bickerton, j.,
in Chambers. Magoon for plaintiff
| appellant, Ashford for defendant.
William Norton VS.. Fashion Stables
Co., assumpsit exceptions from order
striking case from the calendar.
Carter for plaintiff, Peterson and
Creighton for defendant appellant.
II. W. Schmidt & Sons VS.. John
Young, assumpsit; appeal from Bick-
erton, j., in Chambers. Magoon for
plaintiffs-appellant, Ashford for de-
fendant.
In re voluntary bankruptcy VIM. H.
Aldrich; appeal from order of Judd,
G.. j., vacating decree of bankruptcy.
Peterson for petitioner, Hatch for
creditor.
The Queen VS.. Len Tai, embezzle-
ment; exceptions from January
term, Fourth Circuit. Kane for de-
fendant.
Executors will of G. Lucas VS.. f.
H. Redward ct al, assumpsit; gar
nishee's appeal from order refusing to
reopen case. Ashford for plaintiffs,
Magoon for garnishee.
Kwong Sing Wal Co. VS.. ID. w. Pae,
trespass on case; exceptions from
January term Fourth Circuit. Ash
ford for plaintiff, Kane for defendant
appellant.
In re John G. NJ. Sheldon, petition
for writ of habeas corpus; appeal
from order of Frear, j., denying writ.
Ashford, Peterson, Creighton, Rosa
and Kaulukou for petitioner, Attor-
ney-General and Hatch for the Mar
shall, respondent.
T. l.. Hayselden VS.. Wahineaea,
ejectment; appeal from order over
ruling motion for a new trial. Ash
ford for plaintiff-appellant, Nawahi
for defendant.
G. A. Brown VS.. G. N. Spencer, in
junction appeal from decree of
Frear, j., granting writ. Hatch for
plaintiff, rson-Creighton for de-
fendant-appellant.
Hawai- K. George VS.. Hanakaulani
Holt, ejectment !; exceptions from
term First Circuit. Hart
we'll for plaintiff, Rosa for defendant
E. o. Hall & Son VS.. Wilder Steam
ship Co., questions reserved. Hart
well for plaintiff, Hatch for defendant.
Gonsalves & Co. VS.. the same, the
same questions and same counsel.
Van Valkenburg VS.. the same, the
same questions and same counsel.
The following cases are put on the
calendar for re-argument, owing to the
retirement of Justice Dole:
Emily de Herblay VS.. Samuel Nor
ris, assumpsit; questions reserved by
J. Neumann and Thurs
ton for plaintiff, Hartwell and Hatch
ior defendant.
Kailianu ct alvs. Lumai ct al, eject
nent; exceptions from the February
term 1892 of the Fourth Circuit. Rosa
or plaintiffs-appellant, Smith for
defendants.
a. j. Lopez VS.. NJ. Kaiaikawaha ct
Il, ejectment; exceptions from the
January term 1892 of the First Circuit.
MagOon for plaintiffappellant, Ash
ord for defendants.
z. q. CamarinOs VS.. John Kidwell,
covenant; exceptions from April term
'f the First Circuit. Neumann- Creigh-
on for PLAINTIFF Hatch for defendant
NJ. ]. Silva ct al VS.. Anton Homen,
rover; appeal from Bickerton j., in
Chambers. Magoon-Hatch for plain
Ashford for defendant.
In re alleged bankruptcy of Joseph
1ubash, appeal from order refusing
iecree of bankruptcy. Hatch. Carter
or petitioners; Ashford for respond
mt.
X. Lopez and husband VS.. NJ. Soy
Yong ct al, specific performance; ap-
zeal from decree dismissing the bill.
Jastle for plaintiffs-appellant; Ma
,OOh-OdNlusOu lOI ueleuudulS.
NJ. Phillips & Co. VS.. Administrator
tst. Z. Alec, replevin; exceptions from
october term of the First Circuit.
Hatch for plaintiffs-appellant; Castle
or defendant.
J. Nawahi ct al. VS.. j. K. Kekaula,
Injunction and accounting; appeal
rom decree denying writ. Poepoe
or plaintiffs-appellant; Thurston for
defendant.
In re bankruptcy Tai Lung, appeal
rom order overruling plea. Hartwell
or claimants; Carter for the assign
es, appellants.
Haw. Com. & Sugar Co. VS.. Wal
iapu Sugar Co., partition and ac-
counting; appeal from decree allow
ng partition. Hatch for plaintiff;
1artwell-Thurston- Carter for defen-
Iants-appellant.
Pow Kee VS.. Wilder Steamship
o., damage; exceptions from Octo-
'er term, First Circuit. Hartwell for
,laintiff-appellant; Hatch for defen-
Iant.
H. Squires ct al. vs.. Casper Sylvia,
jectment; exceptions from October
erm (lS91) First Circuit. Castle for
n Ias. n