The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1893-12-15
Appeal from Probate Court In Pro-
batting Will Of Sarah ]. SieseL
UNDUE INFLUENCE is CLAIMED.
Tho Tosiatrix Was Not OF Sound Mind
and tho VIII Was Not Her Last Will
and Testamcnt-The Docket for Toe
morrow.

IN nppsat from inc uccrce ot INC pro-
bate court in probnting the will OF Sarah
J. Sicgel was brought before the common
pleas division OF the supreme court today
by John y. Pinkcrton against Allen A.
Prcsbcry, Jndgc Wilbur presiding. The
appeal consists Of several clauses and sets
forth:
That the testatrix was unduly influenced
by three parties.
That she was not OF sound mind at the
time the will was made.
That she was incapable OF making will
on account Of sickness.
That tho will was not her last will and
testament and so not entitled to recogni-
tion. Cooke & Angel appeared for the
plaintiff and +. w. Fink for the defend
ant.
Verdict for the Defendant.
In tho case OF Margaret Redmond W..
Thomas n. Lyman, the jury yesterday af-
tcrnoon returned O verdict for the de-
fendant.
APPELLATE DivIsion.
The following cases were heard today in
| tho appellate division:
William Stctson, alias Thomas Williams,
petition for writ of habeas corpus. The
public statutes, as amended by public
laws, chapter 1924, section 160,
| does not restrict the right of a district
court to admit to bail one accused Of
burglary after he has been bound over
and before indictment found, and it di-
| rects an order to be entered remanding
| the pr isoner to Jail, with directions to the
district court OF the First judicial district,
| to admit him TO bail.
Edward M. Harris ct ux., ct al. vs..
| Oliver Dyer. Heard on demurrer to bill.
Tomorrow's Dock t.
tAppellatc Division.
| Nichols ct al Attorneys--Andrew B.
| Patton and John M. Brennan for plain
| tiffs. McGuinness * Doran for defendants.
1866 Ellen o. Peck ct al. VS.. Benjamin
w. Smith, assessor. Attorneys-Joseph
| c. Ely for plaintiff, Benjamin w. Smith
| for defendant.
264. Ferdinand A. Follct Va. Frank NJ.
Bates, city treasrcr. Attorneys--J. Os-
field, Z. c. Dubois for plaintiff, I. p.
| Barnfield for defendant.
| S345. Thomas Jackson va. Isabella
| Jackson. Attorneys-A. j. Cushing for
| petitioner, Page & Owen for respond
| ent.
952s. Cora NJ. Cram VS.. Charles e. Cram.
| Attorneys-Page and Owen for petitioner.
1902. Peter Donuelly vs. Michael Sim
mons. Attorney--Gcorge j. West for
plaintiff.
1907. Patrick Poland VS.. Julius Ricnold.
| Attorneys-T. +. Cosgrove for plaintiff,
Page 4 Owen for defendant.
| 1889. Mark A. Heath vs. Louis j. Doyle.
Attorneys-Amasa M. Eaton for plaintiff,
Irving Champlin for defendant.
| 25S. Franklin B. Ham vs.. Providence
! Journal Company. Attorneys Page &
| Owen for plaintiff, Richard Is. Comstock k
FOR defendant.
s37l. Susan Gcarin VS.. John Gearn.
Attorneys--Pag ~ Owen for petitioner,
G. J. West for respondent.
1898. Sarah A. M. Shedd vs.. Horace
Shedd. Attorneys Page u Owen for Pc
titioner.
1898. Harriet p. Wall VS.. William 4.
Wall. Attorncy-Edwin c. Pierce for
| petitioner.
5000. ID. A. Wright ct ux., ct al. VS..
Patrick Prior. Attorneys--John w. lIo-
gar and Harry c. Curtis for plaintiff,
Samuel Douglas for defendant.
1921. Owen McAuli1c VS.. Eugene
i. McAul1Hc. AttOrncyS-O, j. west Tor
plaintiff, p. j. Mccarthy and w. III. Greene
for defendant.
1899. Geo. w. Greene vs.. Alexander
Brothers. Attorneys = Page & Owen
for plaintiff, Wilson & Jcnckos for de-
| fcndant.
1893. Frank b. Hazard vs. Joel M
Spencer, ct al. Attorpcys-Ezr X. Parker
for plaintiff, Andrew b. Patton for defend.
ant.
4. Louis l.. Angell Va. V. w. Angell
Attorneys-Louis l.. Angel for plaintiff
Hahu and Cushing for defendant.
Common Pleas Division.
1a6 Albert w. Hixon VS.. ]. Jerom,
Hahn. Attorneys-Cooke & Angcll for
plaintiff, Wilson & Jcncks and j. j
Hahn for defendant.
127. Stephen Remington VS.. George 8
Bullock. Attorneys--Jobn J.. Blodgett
for plaintiff, Hahn & Cushing for de-
fendant.
The calendar OF motions will also bt
called.