Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1893-11-21

The ono receiving minority or a.
Least o. plurality N votes could De given
thr Nlet. lfit were utnUtW ise the VIII
Of the great M Iurliy ~ the people
could be- subvettel and "a very small
Minority br placed Ia control.
After recess this Afternoon MtHffg.
Arthur Brown AM J.. J.. Williams, tho
'UTmu. i0g Mf. Sculcy an the latter i1r
Mt Greenwood, took part In tho
argument
HANuY CONTEST.
The entiIu Vino OF The cAuvasslnE
board was occupied this forenoon by
the contest from SauIy, Salt Lake
county. Attorney Brutze nppuatoI
auI O. he's tuat ihu JuHuua make o..
count Of tho town vote aud include
therein three votes which were by
m stake placed I'm the precinct ballot
box Wnun iuuhi iu the latter place
they we're NOT counted Tor the precinct;
uul NOT being in the town boa, where
they tlghtiu.iy uclonSud, when the count
YVES made they were not included. Mt,
BrgeEs argued that az the returns Ia.
Cludrd the poll lisF, which showed 70
discrepancy Uftnfro between the mum.
her Ot vutoH Call and tho number
counted snuwu On tho tally sheet,
that tlil was such o. discrepancy on
the ,auu Di the returns ns required tho
con assing board 30 order new count
Mt Hlrfs appeared Tor the other
side, and Argued that tne tally sheet VI
the judges constituted the returns, am
Ha there WINS no ifIrgulAuty on the
face ~ that sheet recount could not
be- ordered by thu board.
liza recount De- ordered tis under.
stood that 10 VIII eject q change iu one
pi tho town tfusicur.
PECULIAR pUCuNrSTB.
When She paf0wau city returns
wuro opened by tHu gauvaHiug board
lho following documents wcrU found
enclosed,
To tho Honornblu Utah Commission.
From the enclosed blilJayits you
Will .uG that two challenge were ON.
tered during tho election, one uaainst
81. Wa,s3u,aui ouc agaius, Ef.Wim.
NOR, on tuo ground tnat they ars VIC.
lUtiuU tie Eimuugs- Fucker law,
40 was decided ~ two " the Judges
that 10 they could take aud subscribe
90 the enclosed oath they could cast
their voicp, which they DID, JUICE
Adams taxing tho grOuad that the
iakiug ~ tho oath was not sufficient
but that they ought 10 be- required TO
furnish oral proof that they were not
guilty 10 the satluiactl0n OF tuo Judges
% vlvoilon.
We would be very glad q you would
give Us your opinion iu regard 10 that
matter, AMI you would greatly 0bbge,
WILLIAM II, HoLYOAIS,
Nrw 5, WIuTNEY,
HUGit l.. ADANfs.
Tho aniiavlt enclosed read as FOL.
lows.
Territory Of Utah. .s
County OF Iron. !
William II .lyoak, Of Parowan CITY,
Iron county, utah, npiug duly sworn,
ON his oath says ON Information anu
belief! The grounds Oi my challenge
Of l.. ID. WatsIuis right 10 vote are AZ
ioliowG the said l.. ID. Watson N d
polygamlet anu his second vito has
hau CHILD within the year dating
from November z, 1899.
WILLIAM HOLYOAlS.
Duly sworn TO g-iOfs the probate
| Judge Of Iron cOuntG
Then follows communication from
/ William n. HolyoaH, presiding iudg,
d election reading ~ i0ll0ws:
pAROwAS, Nov. 7, 1898.
Fint-whofo does Emily Crane
liyc2
Btcond-Ia she or has chs been your
| rbputBI second Wiiu2
Ihird-Whgt ago IL your y0ungesl
! uhillg
Mf. Watson would not answer these
questions bus subscribed 10 tho follow.
iug oath!
1, Lorenzo ID. Watson, do solomnly
swear that 4 have not c0habited poly
! gkmgusly with more than one woman
since Nov. /, 1880.
LURENzD ID. WATSON.
Subscribed uud sworn 20 before th,
presiding Judge.
Then follows an oath VI Peter Win.
mer In the same way.
A HOlyOak IN elected mayor VI PaFo
wan by two votes, there " not likely {,
be any contest on mis- part.
TIE COUNT.
The count by the general canyaaBinp
board is likely 10 DO completed THU
evening. Up 10 this afternoon thu
results M declared were Us follows
MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS.