Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1893-11-07
JUDGE GREENE DENIES THE RE
OWNERSHIP.
DlssolvEs THE INJUNCTION,



against tho management and for the APP
,,',t.,,,,.,. % a roceivor rame nm before
p''t"'1At VI 49,. -. .I.,.,t. H.
Judge Greene OF me por'5 'v'b"'" -
dicil district yesterday morning.
The defendant H. q. Senter president
- ~, Goss,,., ,,-,,,,,r, yoa examined
VI NV -, 10,
touching inc chhrse OF an attemPe "
him 10 dispose of the property.
After brief nrrnment bv counsel, the
,,t,t,,,,
court rehu'reu IS "'V'al'"'
The demurrers 10 the M, denying 'he
application for a receiver and dssolv-
...,.t la, wool.
ing inc hJuhc'loh h'"t,'S' NJ
The following " ine luh ''At Va
answer 10 the bin Of the plaintiffs, WIN
a., ovcantion Of exhibits. showing their
sl',-....,,.,,,,,,,'
ihcoih"''"V5' ~
In district court Ihrrgnt county, ~.
j. Q. Martin ct al, plaintuf' vs.. '"'
Gazette company st a., ,urlchNlh'S.
Now comes The Gazette company uni
". q. Sehtor. me del -
sppuse 10 The order ~ me liNhi =;
Greene, judge OF the rory -elEhl1 Jn u9''',i
district, made November = ln''' "a
show c1use, etc, and repiyhg 20 eHiu
bill herein BLEED moves ne court 70 tNIsis
The restraining order 10y y ~ nus l'n s,
entered and refuse iNe renrl PlHseNi '''
die following rehsohs' t-Wit'
lst. l)eleudanlS say; maj thr aV'Ii4o9ii,5
w original petition cnnlaihci are Wn''E
insufficient ~ Jaw 10 phiW'lN' Wy i'I'
prayed. wherein the defendants pray ju'E-
mcnt OF ihc tnitH'nl ol 'ut HAlH'
Mud specially rNcrWlhE 20 l"N "s'u
Bulhccncy ut SINE, driridhnt7 sNl 'H'
same Is insuihclcnl' Do ms Nlil pil y
moi verified 10y AFFIDAVIT NC dliuoNlb 90
tho petition Is ihSnllicicht ih mW
I'd. 70 ufllrfuIfMNIN appears AINNl Itlt
nyArmnniH ~ salI p'uuen lll't uI W.
alleged acts OF winch pllHiiUs cohPi,lh
pud Tor which they suck rrlfr~'' ihe dr-
u'hdaht Corporation alone h'. I'F1i y"
complain, aud ~ la'l- are Allr-'h rn"N
mg nllnre on lht pnr. on we ,1'ipl.,
sl1h Z" urt il que promises OF nuih'u@-
ing the plaintiffs 10 art.
~. IL aiiirmotiycy appears tlmt me
,,ili ,i,,''in -', 'nut
an',.' ." '.l' ".,' 49,
ILL., ~ W. w iV'llN'9 t"uPio'H,u H. IVY
pial l ul"i 7"''i AutlVn ~ 10y ,ll''''f
s,7t'nt WIN ul' unI!''s os Putlo,'H u
~ curpnHupN' or pa Nl9i1llYn OF "uy
pp,iE"u1n w l"'"l ~ NV pD,'u,ii,1 a..
ful ~ iAll' 20 eIpW llat hu1 "l Nv
uult'ng nlNv maui HHS Nlp'Il !" Wv
DN'tu OF directors "l thr 9rIohu'ull 'on-
plug l"r 'prLi'oli"h ., u!E W ,ll'
Mlo"ts WI, tt,y,, "', "S LOT w. p!u .....
lioh OF any Htnt Irol or inlatlN"'y,
~
nlhi hiIht rAl,t ~ plAilluHH lNNvtu OF
thhl sllu board 81 directors hnNr ialleu
or REFUSED 20 u'ke NE necessary spPs
"a pro'Gct ne plalnliuH llRhIt
3'R' ~ ailfhilaiitA''S Appyyaiigs inlt tne
pih ny lhe plllhlut ~ inntlNrl9u9 nnu
IuphgtuuS ~ ,h'H' ihNl we plalnllh7
HlIN hHE l,Hu'" US 'tHuliv'N u'S SHl
AlNH no rights h- "lochhu'ahs' Ana "
creditors lheN nrr mol s.ocAhoidert anu
u si"chhgllhrs lh'N ore nor creditors
nnd " iaus Z" snow ~ HuU,ciehi aver,
Alrht Nhrthsr lhe frlicl 1rNd l7 prayed
as sloek9oldcrN or cNdltotr' and it
uulFmauNely appears thhl iley are not
Dom
hih' II nilrmgtVry appears 10y fine r.
citnls 90 TO the property OF the de.
PENDANT company and The purposes Of
she corporation that the defendant,
senior, could not dispone Of any of the
d"i"ndnuts property, nor divert its pur
poses without the cooperation Of the
defendants board Of directors 10 whom
L. lawfully committed the management
Of the defendants affairs
eth. II fails 90 allrge with sufficient cer-
tninty Of nvermcut any debt due bv de-
PENDANTS to plaintiffs or either of them,
aud hence the prayer for Judgment in
favor Of cach Of snid plaintiffs is NOT
responsive to a sufficient allegation
S,h It ahirmntiyely appears that thorc h
missioner Of parties pliintin-, as
well us cause of action In this; that
tho debt due each Of the plaintiffs IL
less than 4 cognizable under The iuris.
diction Of this court, and tho Chime of
the plaintiffs cannot be Joined IN one