The Lake Charles echo., 1893-03-10

ana 2s e1liflnaa so abs poiHt II Issue. At II
aoa egsry ssrIasee homsgs, bssEssn 1le
aIisazsaonH Il 40 saaietueni and dile evidence
gle4ea b sappgTt ttsTsof, wi1iet wtll aIn0nEt
q Nhat Il called fatal SsfiaRee--iAzt q, !
suel radical, su5sianftVe dtaissenee bstgesE
de aIlsgzl5sns 81 The iadietment apd tbe
aTiasaae oagerea 10 anppuft thereof, a. would
8sstify kbe ae8ui1iei 81 tbe descendant oo that 4
gruaad aloae. Fer Instance, . egBEictiVn
ap0p an iaaicameBt for larceny, o. theft Of
IN eaollar1, would b jnstiaied upon proof
81 tbs laFesBy o. theft of I've dollars; asile
IN ths StBeF haH5 . eonviellen up0a an ~
dsetment ior ihe ihresBy Of isu dollars HOnl6
not be 5ustiaed npon pEscf oi NE isTesBy of
par 81 b0ots; although # may have been
proven fbas ile b0ols gere Of tbe value d
ten dOllsn The rule Of iAF upon that point
Il fhisz II eFesg eEinli0sl DEgseeGtioa tbsI
proof mnss h1bsaautlaiiy support the indict-
t8spt. and any variance 81 substance b this
respect y fatal IRbsFe perjury 10 assigned
o. charged upon oral that is,Eefbal testimony, /
d is uut necessary up0n the trial Of criminal
pEosscutioa Ter saeh alleged perjury f0r the
siate oT psoseepior, IL proving shat the de-
ieBdaHt orally testified, ID prove tpsiaiasis
ssr6ia -tlaE d, 70 prove the very words tbem-
selves wbieh the defendant used in giving
such oral q verbal testimspE; Il bsiBg sufI
client % prove enthusiastically what be aaia 10
a1sh oral tsstimouy, oa the point at issae Or
question II controversy npoB which perjury
4 aasigpes o. charged. Tho whole matter
aet out IL the indictmsntas sworn must be-
/ proved to have been saOfn. It Is not neces-
aaFy 10 prose Il literally, bat It must be
| proged substantially.
/ IN eysFy criminal prosecution for periBFy
ths falsity Of the deieudaut's testfmonys upon
which PeF3ury has been ASSIGNED, must he
pFOVed by BOT less than two Witnesses, or nt \
least bF one witness and circumstances 40
eonbrrnatoFg Of be testimony 81 to be, IN
eonueetlgn herewith, sualeient 70 counter
balance and 10 turn thc scale against the
ldefsHdant's former oatb, and The legal PIE
aampsios Of bis Innocence; for otherwise
there would be merely OstL agaiBst ostb bot
eli tbsapther facts Of caSe 10 DefjnEB EB-the
taking Of The oa1h, The facts dePosed to--all !
except the falfttg gf the siatemsnl--may be !
proved by single witness.
~. - y ~ A-ta' y lAis aehsl@4 a.
sIDs ~ VIZ ''s1s' " A.,'a'lisAi4' u ''le sSaf
a. D. 15sG, provides, 'tThal the competent
witness IN ail criminal matters ghAli b. per
son Of proper understanding Ilo0i1s7, that
the husband cannUt b. q wilusss for or
agaInst his vile, nor tls wife for or against
her husband, except ~ such cases as
= -" pto,i'su Y i@n' lh9s lns elfeAln-
o.'','se Il III "ts1'ssS nsps pAits ese4ssu
s sai = - ~ ~, ~ li's ~ l'lh sss,i
ins' i11D''4.s' Al'as ~ ee sAsii es oils.slieu
~ sAfs sflApsss AEalhsl hi'DEeaii 4unff
e'4' tlias = ~ Peiegls assti9su @sAllS hil'
= 1nip y 'tIl'ss.F' y s'l4" - pn.'se1 -
81 80 ~ 80 li.1. -pp'y = SsNs' nitusaSs
~ i.95 n 'll'l'l'a'A ~ = ~ ilsA'sl5
b, 800
Y. q Slas ii's - AeRsliy
slAAil aAOb Ds construed lVf OF agsihsk hllni
but Gil testimony ehail be weighed aud con-
adhered aeeording u the general yulas Of
.,,,.,.,,,,.. 80 M -, t..,,.' 4, st.,-
p s+'' .
the Jury therefore charge you gentle
faen, that this iAB OF 1886, which have lust
VI read ~ van a apr,Iicat,,s n ,F,s ease
SI @
~ - Esneiat RUE gl ths law 81 evidence
that NltneaseB can teetify only 70 facts within
their kuowledge. But, On questions OF
-,l ~, a.,
spisnep' sAiii ~ hAae5oF Olhsis ~ lug hhe
KIND, psre0ns OF skill, sometimes called ex-
psftk for example, euch "A medical men
mav not aniv te.t,fy ~ fao,s ,,Itttr ,t,slr
hhVRlenBe, put afb peTIniiLed 70 give Their
opinions 10 Evidence, on questions connected
, Win or relating 10 tbeir profession or ocet,-
i.
F@tish' 9Npu 'Pinions' Hnsh fseslfeu -
evidence, are, however, not conclusive but
are to b. canaldered and weighed AZ other
aytaaao.
III Inc law pfeepmes that the Defendant IN
z thig case Il Innocent of.the crime ehAFUed
syainst Nh, A. me tn6iet,oent a. thia .sss
Z. N, Nj n sD's s4ss'
untll lnat erlinet ln Az its essential ana mate
i rial circumstances, has been proven beyoud
Z raasanable doubt The words 4 4 reasonable
!. i !, ... Z, ~
A0uot, y hsie tlseg, fssaa gusg HhaI lhsJ
~ 1919. ~ ngl
,s,,, n, Sat,t. M, ,,,.b ,i5,,,,
f n a ~ ~ es,i s,s { w w
~ y ~ ~ ~ alu ~
teLsll I, ~ w ~ Dse ~ % eaeuss
nielssta tss ~ Z "a ~ III VA 1Atg q
,, Ss,1,. \. i,,ss ~,
I ~, % sft. ..ossit, d..it'stI,,, ,,,,sa,
lal 1 ans, a,sst II; II. bP9n
3 ~ ~ ~ " sas ~ Nv
s... sr....d shl s,,ie, ~ . = = s
s. sase ~ NJ y lns 1ungss enaigs " m
~. ~, Nv, IN, r. ~
~ ,e.,,o ei,srssS s.st,., nm e - '''''
i Yan ~ sie lade,ss M XIV, isw sus IN tte
!; t..,s NJ ~ 49, s n X a-o,,i.'i,, =, ~
/, NJ. VI \, n ~ 4.
~ s y, m 49, X "A \
Z - z, ~ .s z. ~, ,iis
+ s 5., IN, 49, ~ - iNip nAib
N 80, ~ ". bt5 ~. eviasro. hs,o,,l
Ss..ss Y, n, ~ i !,
2 .e,s- Y, .s e ,,s I p.t n
g si5.ta h,,s,s.s VI t,',s, ,.l I, ~,
4 s,st III is.i, Z, ~ (, X ~
.ai, 7, .s y i.,st..l. ~ "
z see ~ ~ y. ,. u ~ S Ps y
2 N. h..s. NV ss's' rasI s5 = X
y. 9s,s 9shs - ,s,t,,a ~ @ w sea osssp II
4 gte1as5 w tastss w hsAse q e. ~ lesaiA "
lAsss M Nv gsas ts9s w. " wv ap ~ w
: Ahlhfb ~ Aue eAfl JAhi8gt VI buH peace tuhl