The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1893-03-01
y 800 0eeoeaSeeec@oon
WORTH q GUM "a A RcZ.

@=esSs aSNS1S1 SSrSsa N%IlSaEaNe >---
Marion also opposed the report. He said
the bill was unconstitutional and that
az one OF the guardians of the
interests of the people he wovld favor no
such appropriations. Representative
Hench spoke in favor Of the measure He
thought the coming of the grand army TO
Indiana would inure to the benefit of the
people throughout the state. He favored
the bill a democrat aud as an ex-sol-
der, and hoped that IL would pass Re-
ferring TO Gu lop's efforts against the bill.
he suggested that sos. 600 could be raised
by Tapping OFF, the proposed appropriR-
ton for the VincenDes university lie
also made the statement that had
frequently been made before that ne could
no understand where Cullop secured the
inspiration that helped him in the pro-
duction of such an appropriation bill as
the one the house had been considering for
two DAYS past
MIR. Fippen spoke favoring the bill. He
said that the sentiment IN Upton county
was in favor of the appropriation. and he
believed il should be made. Mr. John
son OF Marion also spoke for il.
The roll was called on the adoption
OF the report, and by a vote of 30 20 AZ it
was rejected. The following was the
vote:
Nays-Ader. Askren. Barnes, Behymer
Burkley, Blair, Blue, Clsuser, Collins, Cooley.
CraVenS. Creigmile, Cullop, Cunningham
Daley, DOlmRn, Duncan, Erwin. Farlow,
Franks. Gill, Guthrie. Harkins, Heagy, Hig-
bee, Hord johnson OF Dearborn, KesteT, Lowe,
Megenity. McCallister. Mcintyre. MeMuilen,
Passage, Redman, Reeves Rodabaugh, Schsf,
Schroeder. Sexton Smith, Stark, slower. Such
snek. Swope, Terhune. NermillOn WashoUru,
Wilson of Dubois, WFght-total, so.
Yeas-Allen, Atkinson. Balm, Bassett.
Baugher. Beane. Bethel. Davis. Deery. Dim
widde. FippeB, Foster. Gregg, Grosssrt. Hsg.
gard, Hamrick. Harman, Hay. Hench. Hesler.
Hunter, johnson of Marion, Jordan, hamp,
kaufman. Lindemuth. Lyons. MsnWRring Mer-
edith. MOntOux, Morris. hoCorkle, NevhOuse,
Newlin, Richter Stak ebAke. Stephenson. Sui
ger, Thompson, White, Wilson of Marion, Mr.
Speaker-total, AZ.
The house went into committee OF the
whole Friday afternoon, the questi' n
under discussion being Cullop's appro-
priation bill, item 3. Mr.. Blair o cred
an amendment striking out the lines APP
propriating S75, 900 for new laboratory ami
recitation buildings at Indiana university,
the total of which was $l50,0O0. the
amendment was lost by a viva vOce vote.
Mr.. Johnson of Marion had offered an
amendment raising the appropriation for
the university from $4,000 to $4,000.
Mr.. Johnson supported his amendment
In q spirited speech, and it was carried by
division, the vote standing AZ to 81.
The item further provides for an APP
preparation for Purdue the same as was
provided for the state university.
Mr.. Blair moved to amend the
lines providing for an Appropria-
ton of $4,000 for new laboratory
and recitation rooms. Blair supported
his amendment in speech in which he
maintained that the state has no right to
assist in the higher education Farlow OF
Franklin said the state couldn't afford to
appropriate he sum, and said the monev
should be given to the common schools il
to any institutions of learning. Mr.. Hag-
gard spoke against 1t and Mr.. Nc II ahan
favored the appropriation. advocating the
cutting OF expenses elsewhere and giving
to the univt- rsity what IL wants CulIop
explained why it was necessary TO put in
the appropriation for the building The
national congress appropriRtes $4,000
every two years, but 1t is absolutely nee
essary to erect suitable buildings or the
national appropriation cannot be held.
The amendment Was lost and the item
adopted as printed
The appropriation for the normal school
al Terre Haute was considered. The BIZ.
provides for $4,000 for the school, and
5000 for the cree ton OF new laboratories
and recitation rooms. Mr.. kester
moved to amend by spDroprisung
$685. for the erection of the
buildings. He spoke AZ some length II
favor of the amendment Mr.. Hord
favored it because he declared that if
would be benefit TO the whole common
school system OF the state by educating
the teachers OF the entire state. Mr..
Sulzer favored the appropriation because
the education of the teachers a. Terre
Haute is blessing to the whole state.
Mr.. Fippen made a characteristic speech,
in which ne mentioned the hard earned
dollars in the pockets OF the people. lie
asserted that the normal school at Val
paraiso had furnished more and better
teachors than al the other schools and
colleges together without q cent of cost 20
the State. After some further discussion
the motion was put, but the chair was IN
doubt. Messrs. X ester and Eippen were
designated RS tellers. There was 4 light
discrepancy of six IN the. count, but as
both lost the motion the larger number
was taken. The vote stood 80 yeas, 80
nayes, aud Terrs Haute gels S60. 500 for
new buildings.
The section providing Tor the REIN purse
ment of the trustees OF Nincennes uni
vers.ty for the sale of land and paying
into the state treasury S25.010. Mr.. Creig-
mile moved to amend by striking out the
whole section, and gave a. his reasons
that the bill was only desired by the lob
bylsts and attorneys who hoped to profit
by 1t. Mr. Terhune favored the appropri-
alton, and read long extracts from an edu-
eational history OF the state IN support Of
his arguments. The history was possessed
of the merit of age. il nothing else. A
long list of decisions from various courts
were read. 10 which no man listened. and
much speculation was heard as 10 the side
upon which he was talking. Some insinu-
atoms were made 10 the effect that he
appropriation was provided for for a pur-
pose. Mr.. Cullop thought the insinuatiOns
merited a reply, ami gave the house
another taste OF ancient history
for a pastime. Not a fact was added by
the explanation. and when he sat down