The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1893-11-25
NOT READY YET TO VOTE,
But THE COMMISSION WIFE MEET
AGAIN NEXT 7UBsDLK.

-
- - -. xw -. p'. ~.
y,ts.,or As,.,s that an. N.,,.,,.. g.,
Have Nothing 10 no with the B..h. Ro.s.
n, ste,,vsv ..cbo,,u., o,.,.a $500.
-, a. pa,d r.a.,. 49, wy
lnR ol VIZ nap,u i.ansC commissioners yes
terday afternoon Win shot At the Reno tun-
mel plan. ). W. Reno and Joseph @. lillian. at
the meeting OF the Commissioners on Monday.
presented their plans for a double.decked
s tunnel and promised to give to
hl. o.eu" 20, oo.vte yes'eruay meeunl tne
bnck them nm. "
said Mr.. Steinway. land stated that they were
unable TO give ma those names Tbav saId
that they were not ready at the present time
to do this. That plan lie therefore disposed Of
iop .o.u" c. 49, -,
beiore the commissioners adjourned MT.
Reno said. in explanation Of his failure to make
s1Uu ns prS I INA. . tne men VINO were
willing to advance the capital thought IT wa:
this tme He @ h "' tina.
h. vns .c,in !, a. ,,ood Tier
This left the ground clear for the discussion
the franchise to be offered a, public sale The
proposed route OF this railway was printed In
Tuesdays Sun. Mr.. Inman said when Il was
presented on Monday that he wanted time to
Investigate It before he would vote. Yester-
uay no sHIu 'nH' ne nuu kHen une " .no
Bushe plan. and had walled up some OF the
90 tba rs,roh stroot go .nd osy.rad ,h,.
smanJmnnp. '''' ''' ""N wis
S.-, vi That tn. resolution introduced BY Commits.
ont All th, norton Of he pTopSs.d po"t. on The
east sue north Of Iorty.secona Streets also TO ssys
Wooster street and University place and to sub.tiiute
pSs a,r thereof line somineneing hud, ,o
pos ue We .s hsS ha the The pse
q constructon shall be with not less than
In exclamation Of this amendn.nt Mr. In.
man said; My objection to Church street ia
that It is too narrow. and it would DO too eI-
Moreover, there is no ninee for termiSals' "'''
II suggested that route" said Mr.. Bushe.
Broadway line that could be obtained. 80 far
ns terminal facilities are concerned / know OF
that parpoSe." '''"N 'f'a'o ''opo'" '0'
ssk: S NJ sisi%ssy .. u' % . .'
now" answered Mr.. Porter
DO YOU prefer il? p
What objection have you to the east side
plan: Mr.. lnman Z" asked Mr.. steinway.
we couldn't eel an underground sys;
sell Mr.. Bushes east side plan. which is q
combination OF tunnel and elevated.
MI OOu,h
be sold. because the tunnel could bs easily
constructeo. In MS OPINION eiectrlcity should
be the m9tive power on Mr; Bushes proposed
toau. ar Dusno Ulhh Is LOT an eleVateu
structure a10nR the ine OF tourtn avenue 70
point near IhiTty-Iouttnn sIreeI: anu tnence py
tunnei 20 p pom. nsat nou,n s.ree, tnence oy
elevated. depressed structure. or by tunnel as
may be found exredient, to point near i39th
street. Ihls means that the road snail dip
under,the Grand Central station.
MT. Bushe sala ne was WING 70 acceps Mr.
Ihmahs amwendment o. Tucson street ior
acceptable. 30 lar as the elevated roau through
foufteehth street was concerneo. nr. Steln.
way saiu tnnt every GUINNESS man on the street
taVoteu ~. 1T began TO LOOK as " the west sue
line OF the Bushe tlan might De ADOPTED. when
MI. Ihnan D,ockeu tne vote ageln ~ an
nounclnH, tnht even u MS hInehument Was
accepted he wasn't ready to vote on tho entire
West side pan. .. ,,,..
It. Something better may occur to me.
con see why AFTER SUING duletly ior several
mohths. we snoulu rnsn TINS thlnR throuRh IN
Two or three Gays: ~ IS TOO Dig question Ior
tnat. lou trled 70 IoTce TINS vote on me Iast
mon1ay melore hau hau time 10 investigate
the plan. NJ,
Ihat seiueo r tne pFosPoct OF vote on III.
Dushes pan. Inen Mr. IN man oHerep ahother
resolution that threw some light on his oppo-
stloh IL Was'
Rsov,d Further, thas u the franchise for this sys
,h - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ o
nsysr he with or run in coniunction vii
the Manhattan Elevated railway Company but must
Railway Company.
Mr.. Bushe seconded this resolution and IL
Gsno pBeirne. who rspresents n .yndieats
that il ready TO bid on anything, said: After