Morning journal and courier. [volume] (New Haven [Conn.]) 1848-1894, 1893-08-29

| Terry, DEM, Arkansas; Wheeler, DEM,
Alabama; Williams. DEM, Illinois; vii
liams, dem, Mississippi; Wilson, rep,
Washington; Woodward, dem., North Car.
olina-Total, ITO.
The members who stood by silver under
the Bland-AIlison act but who finally voted
for unconditional repeal were: Anderson,
dem West Virginia; Black, DEM, Georgia;
| Bun, dem. North Carolina; Conn, dem =,
Indiana; Donovan, dem, Ohio; Doc
little, rep, Washington; Edmunds,
dem, West Virginia; Hare, dem,
Ohio; Holman. DEM, indiana; Hunter,
| dem, Illinois; Lawson, DEM, Georgia;
Lester, DEM, Georgia; Linton, dem =,
Michigan; Aarahall, dem: ViTginia; No
Tennessee; Meredith, dem.,. Montgom,
ginis; Paaoh.l, dem, Texas: Paynt-
or, DEM, Kentucky; Pendleton, dem, ,
Texat; Post, rep, Illinois, Prince,
dem Louisiana; Richardson, dem, Mich.
iRan; Richie, DEM, Ohio; Russell, dem :,
Georgia; Stone, DEM, Kentucky: Swan
son, DEM. Virginia; Taylor, dem, Indi-
ana; Tucker, dem, Alabama; Turpin,
DEM. Alabama; Tyler, DEM, Virginia;
Weadook, dem Michigan; Whiting, dem
Michigan.
There were ten Incorporating silver
msn who voted against the Bland act and
then against repeal. They were: Broder-
Curtis, rep, Kansas; Hepburn, rep, Iowa;
Loud, rep, California; Mallory, dem,
Florida; Marsh, rep, Illinois; Meikeljohn,
rep, Nebraska; Smith, rep, illinois; Tay-
lor, rep, Tennessee.
Mr.. Catchings, DEM, Mississippi, gave
notice that he would ask the house to con-
slider the rules to morrow, and then the
house adjourned.
The votes In the house to-day we're re-
markable for the very high percentage of
members recorded. On the last two roll
names; Shell and Graham were paired,
leaving but three representatives. out of a
total voting strength of 354 apparently un-
accounted for. Mr.. Cooper of Wisconsin
would have been present, but was called
away this morning by the death of his
father. Speaker Crisp did not vote, leav-
ing but one member whose absence was
One cause of the unexpectedly large vote
against free coinage of silver wss the
changed attitude of members from the
southern states.
At no time did the anti-silver men have
less than " clear majority. Their greatest
strength was shown on the II to l amend
an anti-silver msjolity of 14O. On
the fusl pa sing of the bill tine ants mus
tered the same strength as this, but owing
to the desperate rally of the silver men
their majority was cut down to $780, One
Of the surprises of the day was the lack of |
strength of the 30 to amendment. It was |
supposed to be the strongest proposition |
that the silver men had in reserve, but 1t |
proved weaker than the 16 to l amend |
nent.
IN THE SENATE.
The bill to allow national banks to in 1
crease their circulation was taken up In /
he senate to day and a vote was taken on
he amendment offered by Mr.. Cockrell, |
lem, of Missouri, for the redemption of |
Der cent. bonds, and the payment there
ore in new issue of treasury notes. The
was rejected: Yeas %, nays 80.
The Lee Mantle case came up this after
loon. The first vots was on laying on the |
able the motion to reconsider the vote of
asst week declaring Mantle not entitled to
he seat from Montana. The motion to
sy on the table ives agreed to-yeas 81,
lays rs. This finally defeats Mantle.
COIN C0INAGE ARnRREn |