Ellsworth American. [volume] (Ellsworth, Me.) 1855-current, 1893-10-19
COURT HAPPENINGS.
business OF the Supreme Court for the
Past Weck-Grand Jury's Report.

Fast Weck-Grand Jury's Report.
OCTOBER TERM, 1898.
l.. A. EMERY, Justice presiding.
! JOHN T. KNowLToN, Clerk
}. W. PATTERSON. Sheriff.
I h. ). CLARK, County Attorney
A. ii. SMALL, Stenographer.
! HARRY AUSTIN, Messenger.
| full report Of the opening proceedings OF
the current term OF court was given 10 last
| weeks issue. The court got down to business
promptly on Wednesday afternoon of last
week, and following is a summary of the cases
tried:
WEDNESDAY.
| Charles ". Andrews vs.. George NJ. Warren,
admir- verdict for plaintiff for $40; A. W.
King. E. +. Chase for PHI; o. F. Fellows,
q. NJ. Warren for deft.
The second action tried was WIN. Allen (
Sons vs.. Geo. II. kimhal. The plaintiffs re-
side In Worcester, Mass, and the defendant in
Cleveland, Ohio. The plaintiff. In July, 1890.
sold the defendant a marine boiler for the
steamer "Emmelne," and the CRATE not fitting,
new one was shipped. to recover for which
this suit was brought The defendant claimed
Tor the second one. Verdict for plaintiff Of
S50l Peters for plaintiff. Warren for de-
fendsnt.
THURSDAY.
Caroline D. Saunders v. MARY d. Jones
Tbis was an action of trover To recover the
value OF certain amount OF furniture. on
September -, lS'2, Mrs. Saunders bought the
Castine house at Castine, together with all the
furniture therein contained.
When she took possession sept. -, she
claims that part OF the furniture had been
removed by Mrs. Jones, the former owner
and this action is brought 10 recover the value
OF the furniture removed. Verdict for slO6 .,
Fellow for plaintiff, Warren for defendant.
FRIDAY.
william Plant ". Hosea Il. Phillips. Ac-
ton of troNer TO recover the value Of a buck
board. After opening TO the jury the plaintiff
became non suit. Stuart for plaintiff: Mason
for defendant.
Thomls Phillips ". II. b. Phillips and L. J /.
Phillips. This action VS., brought hy the al
miui-lraior Of the estate OF William Phillips
To recover on a note given IN the life time Of
Ni.liam Phillips. The defense wa, that the
defendant, had paid funeral expenses, doctors
BILL. nursing. etc. Evidence disclosed the
fact that these BILL were actually paid after
The appointment Of the administrator. The
court ruled that this was not a legal defense
70 the action, and ordered the jury to bring In
averdict for ihe plaintiff for the .um Of S2o7.-
-. y. W. King ior plaintiff Mason for de
PENDANT.
SAT- kl'Af.
"P'' ""'A "faH " Augustus W. Mooney
~ iA''''s '''e IN hl'h'i'T' aud the cut
'''"-.' !" ,o'r.. the Amount Of - Tor
~.''' iu,'''ned NJ W. lte"ry at the request
% '"' N'''ulAH'' lue defense was that the
I Iut-' " 'lA' 'ne p'A'h'Ih ~ Mr. He"ey
.i''' so'i' mol exceeding = IN amount All
', '1' 80 81" - '''"' "i''und'f standing out
" VT! drought p verdict o. S1'-a' for the
I.a'n'n' l. H. smith for palniif; Q. r..
FELLOWS ''F i'i'huAn''
THE GRAND JURY.
az ~ AhH .u'N came IN ftidaS hlGht AFTER
. session Of four day.. They reported i in
d'''nieh'' = follows
L'44or a!rtaeut-.................. ..........p
h-'apc from .-...-.
ii"'e'' Observation-Disclosures.
''.'-'-''' '''-''-...--- .'...'-..'.......
'...., -...'' 20" - '''''''''''''
,--,,.,
p-,,lt+.,..l..,.-.,
Assault MIA lr,cn,,, k.if.....
'''o - "N''-' Iu''''N ana lhofhA'
~ ~ oN' '''' mere Au-uN' = were
Y" ''' yA'-"'' aux i1ty Dreaded eh'ty
l"' "''' >'l''h''H' AlhF" /" ,iAt. day ani
40 HN' 'Al' N 'A' county Jai. An
r. '"' |a' A'It''l served 'iN'y day 90 the
'"a.-' p l'.''''I' Ah'hH
''',''' y '"A''' u''d Ior Fo'''hS The
nm III - t'''N- '''ilp"u! ~ haF liAfbor OF
money package 81 Sl"' wa brought into
'oD'' '"4 i''''l'i ho' guilty.
'''' 49,, % nUNA'' " bridges me Jury
> W. ''-',' ,i'''n'-N' 9A'urdAy' Ah' Drought
j '''''' 20 '"' P'"'n''n ~ me sum OF
u
II ''.''"' az i''''In' va
" '''' "a. < - ,''A''"S "A'on auu
- IT, a -'h'en'fu 20
,u I'll
,..',,' '-,'' ~ A''"'-N'D 'o' ny
,''..,.'.'..'.'. ~ "'' "a
~ ~
'''1' ~ =,
,.r..,'.t :I. ,1.
t.-,l,.i.