Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1893-06-30

meniion made Of block 0S or G
y Is undisputed that when Tucker
SOLD aud Conveyed 10 the several Defend,
anus they purchased with reference 10
Tue tlndley map, that they paid value
Tor their laud; that when they purchnsed
and pad for the lots they wetc iginraa.
~ tue "Celn' map relied upon by the
plaintiff, and that they never hranl of
any clnim BY the plaintin te the lnis ia
question, that they had ATTORNEYS 20 m-
rcstWite their little which VAS reported
10 them AS being good Il appears also
tina, Edward lsham. the nsmole Nendar
Of The hclts, paid the valuable consider
ton stated IN his decd for the Rot which
he purchased, and while tlcr, k nu al
rect evidence that he was iauorppt Of
the deed executed tn this rompauy ciis
cnmstauces Justify this coueulon. The
correctness OF which secms indeed to tr
admitted by the appellant. At the lime 81
purchase by the several defendants no
map ut fuckers addition was on record,
The company Ia the summer or Tall Of
tSSl constructed It's mad-bcd across
strip of The lan1 purchased by Il from
Tucker. The distance from the rear line
Of the lots IN controversy % the ctlitcr Of
the roadbed is ia2 feet
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW.
Tie record presents two issues First,
nre the lots in controversy Included in
block IS as purchased by the company
FROM ruckcry Second II SO. Aro the de
fcnlants and Rppeilees bona hdS pur-
rhnsersq The several assignments of
crrnr rciisd nnon ere address,i exclusive.
ia IN thn second issue I'VE hnyr. thorn
fore no concern about the f0rluor save
Ia 50 far ns the facts lnridout thcreto
may bear upon the proper solution OF the
latter
ii will he noted that the appcllces
If,lt viO, rrfercnrc IA ihplr claims
fr,n, iAiyynrd l4hnn ocetipv nm attitude
"a snr,,. eytrnt JiOprrnt frbm that Of mo
remainina dcfenJnnis, anal mis-. FOR thn
rensou thnt mi fhp lime Of lshnmR pur.
rh1se tbe lend M tbe company was NOT
AZ rs,o,,i III ishatn ,yns M lunucant put-
cbnsnr ,hs ada y,higb he ronycvei 10
,Gn ti,its ,youil n,as fn fhpu nunffpatrd
hv any nndre which they Themselves
n;i,ht b,vc Mad iibn tius Of the 500.
XXI nnTsbssnr with nntier /. protecftd
III the ,nod faith Of Tho first purchaser
,'t,,,,,, S,,,,iio, D. ts,tn,rn,' 4 ls,,uil,. 1ur.
is,,,Gsnc, s,i.,ion III
hbo trisi rnnrt arsnryllntlv lu a srpn.
raia ,lnnse insitnclrd liz INV Win rnf.
arenc,, to tlie defence of mo hppcllere
Iini, In ,be fnlin,ying lnnrnnrr.
~, an, fnttbnr inst,Yl,,fei maj II van
t.,iitu ~ -, H., o,i1snce thnt ma AZ
e,I, ~ ii HIN nnl Sally unit
in,,,,i,, an n,i1 Il, ,ooI faith far tho
I'M NM ir,irler mi ,yif. 9nnycvrd "a
i VIZ, I'M t.hanf s6"t ISL witbont
80. ma saih 1urtsr NH yvife hn1
,,.,,'i,.,,i any.tel thr sntne In
Tt,,tHe' gnw ain Gnd for then,
lna'hNnh' nv ,n,,
e. ~ .i,I5,,.. tbat aim, IL
p , liN ~, w niI ist,t,, ,Isin,iG
Ner N'''Nl T. ,...,,,l ,,,i,,,, ti,,.,. a.
~, NV h ,aovu I'm H." ~ IL r,iiu1y n,roboh
Wy fs 4, ia ,n,.,i,as,.I from snii
nv, n.y. i"'H ,yiSe ana furtber h.llrvc
fr ovSu ,bs a,iIencc tbat block ~ of
i i,pil }no NV, az, Non I,si,,
luehpI "u ., l,ro,,,,1
hutsd WIZ tnvp 't,i5 i,,' ,,uj
hlll lhn1 coINvg"a W ha ie', ,,.i,t wv w
lhNt sn,u MY ~ t, i,, h,d liam t,n
elei'uS 10 sluI fr,i,. ~ tn xxx
'n.tHS4,,,u,,,gS h,,t II, nrj.r lar ftc notice
p pWnrind Inv Tlnipuf's grading said land
No. prevent said W. II. Hull and Sally
iiolt fratn claimins as innocent purrhns.
~ ,, ,,,,sf bciievn tbat II aaid ~ IN
Iioit and sally lIolt mad exercised rpns,
- i "'' iu;,.,,sa tl,, ,gntid hnva dla
,i,.ll XXX s,td is,,d VIVA conveyed hy
e,td Tneter and wife Ia plaintiff prior
4" .,Jj I-b,,n conyevnncr
:" nv" ,',,,ii,t y, e,,nt,ioins NJ tbi4 chsrre
ne alpei LII, ,,., HIM, H. i,ey ~
~. ,,,,,,,,,t t,nrrl,nsor and ID mai an
~ pi ~ Nv, e,.ts Ia eyi,i,utio and nian
pi,"p's ~ ,',,,,aetton ,rIii N siibaenurut
g,,,sa tia conri's charge ID fail. 10
l.....,,i,. 1.cna ,plnt Ynouid he ra5anil-
"fSu'1iI3 a., Nv, nart ~ Vii thc H..
guy anlEs"' ~ nint INN H ia charge
l,n,N,l,,9' ~ 4, on,,r,9a5 ia G,e ttnd1e
WIS e.tu.V" a,d mi ~ nv, nreiu1ire Of
w an.asi ,rn,tded mo e6tirf usns
w VIZ. 1iu,,i,,s nn,ier tha ayiien,,e
,pol''s. :" ,gbi,.i, a,,nailat,f ovilonth, I'M
ny ny, ,h.t fsl,1y, bad pnrehaaed IN
inl,, 80 ~ d,..d Ia M r,inpanv
ignt, az ono a. he ,yas y I'M.
ou'h pYlnt f,i,b ssitbo,t ,,ntir, IN
.lias't :" III and gaiiir Itoif shnnid
Ntn1t",s, ,, ron,,lraJ IL tba charge IN
hpl no M, "ianyhf Aud midi m
snow , tp1i. w., ~ tho isad fiat ;fptter adj
KY ia. ooy -" d 10 Eiwari Ishani. eie."
~ Eor The tbe reasons already stated proof
ot ihe snpl W. ~, n I'M,
sulnrN 'o' 'N''' ,...-t,t...
WIN Reference ~ fut M,
pppeilani ~ ~ ro,J M .nelrieut nntjt,
or alPHliintHt 49, ~ *. aIrsrte fI,in
~ Ky nn, ,',it, ,,s deeu II nrotop 10
~ ~. 'n ,i,l,sa', ,n Mn, ma forsy.ln,s
saA ~ XXI. ,',st,, ,i,arrs a vii II.
.lAusy ~ 't,ar.i,,, ft,.r ~, nui fi,nf 80
lhe 2" i,,,, ,,.,,,,etatao n M fart ,bns
n9iASu MN, Ive lo moi thing fhat IAe
l'liyv , usH' ~ IN soiopanya road-bed
sYn, XIV, no feet listant from ihe
aiv"- ,s,,,,sr-y shanld bgre ~ iaaai.
l.ts 81 ,'i,..s,i,,, ~ raiIra N tha de.i
Nuvii w Ius,,'Y" reenr,i,a v'ss n,G
nsient t5 aharge he defsndanis with
,,.,,,i,,.ls,. nntir9 OF appeliaBfs claim. he
ltsien indieaied ~ lie rodbad