Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1893-03-19
JUDGE pARDEE DIscLA1Ms.


Editor Gazette: ,
n Telegram dated New Oreansi M't ,Sn
following day, purporung 70 give lne , 5nu
stance Of an interview held WIN hon'
Don A. Pardce. United states circuit judge
IN which that gentleman was made 10 say
that while ON visit 10 New Orlehns 70
Law before him certain charges HRWuat
CiRs Dillingham; and Daniel Ripley hi
that Iime receiver and general ifclsht
agent respectively, Of The houston anu
Texas Central railway, mad ifleu 10
bulldozc everybody. and falling M this, hhd
drtermined 10 have revenge ON Diiugham
by forcing him from the receiyership.'
a. the charge WIS 50 nnnitesul Hn1gIu
and untrue, 1 Immediately wrote 10 Juukc
pnrdce requesting TO know whether ho
had been correctly reported on not lue
subjolned correspondence cxplaius hseli.
As u matter or justice VIII You hihuY
give II the same publicity Of your large
circulation accorded the unwurrnntcd SIAN
dcri Judge inrdee's very ptomp, ul1
camer. renders any comment by niysell
fully, JOSEPH NALl.E.
Austin. March 13. 1913
Hon. Don A. Pardec Sew Orleans. III,
Dear Shiny attention has been called
10 the mclosed interview, published IN
yesterdays Houston Post purp0fuhg 70
give. ut least IN substance your views IN
regard to certain statements mhue ny ny
As That portion which alleges thnt WINE
ON my VISIT 10 New OrlcuuH ! "hnd tHed
10 hulldozc everybody, nnd failing IN thin5'
Ind determined to have revenge on lnl-
lmrhnm hy forcing him from the fecrN-
prsilp Of the road, "a ~ grossly untrue
aud ~ utterly without the shadow OF losl.
dntiun n fact. l write 90 ask whether ihr
utterancrs credited To you were CORRECTLY
rpportcd ln the interview, or whether lhrN
were simply evolved from the reporter 5
Xn Immediate response win he duly APP
JOSEPH MALE.
New Orleans La, March 10. 1873.
Au1f
Sill have your lCttcr ~ l8th INST, In,
uulring as 10 alleged Interview published
s5v i'2 6sd short interview with a reporter
Houston and Texas Central rcceivcrship
The conversation was wholly informal nng
sny ns NJ my own knowledge, TINT Nullt
had tried to hulld0zc everybody ana ihi
ing In this had determined 10 have re-
vengc ON Dillingham; by forcing him from
the rccelvCrship" 10 lB barely possible ina
/ said thati Il had been since reporter Y,
me "thnt Male had" etc, because Ger
talnly have been 40 informed by paruci
more or less Interested Ia tue nnt'r
though 1 doubt very much N ! said even
that Respectfully yours pARprE
The term 'bulldoze" was not used II
the telegram received by The Gazette
aud TO that extent Judge Pardee's recol
lection OF his conversation Is correct
The word quoted was substituted h
The Gazette Office for another and
stronger one which The Gazette could no
have used without as il beloved, th
greatest Injustice to Mr. Nalle.
Our New Orleans correspondents Is
veteran newspaper man, In whose accu
racy we have the fullest confidence.
Is not necessary for an experienced r,
porter 60 take down u conversation I
report the substance Of H. We do mo
wish 10 alter. Ia the least. Judge Pnrdee'
later conclusions as 90 the mnttcr bu
In yindication Of The Gazette's inter
ylcws which have, 80 far, nlwny
stuck; Il is recalled that norther passe
southwark lately aud Judge Pardce la
had time and opportunity 20 cool PEI
ccpthly since his FIRST reading OF III
Governors message.