The record-union., 1893-03-16
Rpsnl Rakfns 31n.nnrr.s

insulting to any sensible man who voted
Tor the resolution. If the statements of
tne pee were untrue as to majority of
the Legislature, those who are falsely as
persed could have afforded to treat them
win contempt. If the Capital is properly
located, to vote for its removal on account
vi tne bee statements, or of any random
Pupilcatlon in single newspaper, would
pe childish, puerile and quasi criminal.
IN Weli-ln1ormed circles it has been a
!amlllar fact that this thing has been brew
ing for some time. For years there has
been a growing conviction-not I'M
Hllngleu with sympathetic regret-that
'ne oapllal was unfortunately located.
LVisaha Delta
because OF an article in the Sacramento
pee, expressing JOY at the approaching
close OF the present legislative session.
and crlticising the dark ways of sundry
legislators, the Assembly has passed a
resolution proposing the removal of the
oapltal TO San Jose. There are good, bad
ana indifferent in the Legislature. as
elsewhere, but legislator not hurt by
lhe sung OF the Bee has no excuse for
Young LOT such an absurd proposition;
anu BESIDE, the present lawmakers NAV
not continue to serve their constituents
tnere, anyway, during the remainder OF
IheiI natural lives. Somehow, one can
AAoAuliiS III ulgu personal regard
i tne men who voted against the silly and
little resolution.
INapa Register
The Garden City has what NAV he reclz
oned good lighting chance to win. Its
legislative Endorsement, its climate, its
nearness to the metropolis, its promise to
down the State division ghost, its warm
supporters everywhere-all these things
VIII help the ambitious city in its conten-
ton for Capital honors.
Bright San Jose! 1t always did have
good deal of enterprise and snap in the
makeup of it's citizenship.
lMarysville Appeal
Saturday evening, without the slight
esG warning and without any argument
as 10 why 1t was necessary to souan6er
hVe or SIX millions of dollars. resolutions
were adopted for the submission of con-
stitutlonal amendment for the changing
OF inc STATE Capital to San JOSE OF all
Inc 1901 things that a body of men. sup
posed TO represent the intelligence of a
State, was ever guilty OF, the action al
iuded 10 tops them off. The haste was
dlsgraceful and advertises the men as
mental colleagues OF the jibbering idiots
OF an insane asylum.
lSonoma Democrat
j., Inc sudden action of the Legislature in
Inc matter OF the removal of the State
NfAN- - SaeOu q llNSly Interest mere. AS
general thing it was thought that San
Jose was too far south, but it was sur
prlslng how Indifferent the people were
toward Sacramento. If any central loca
tlon easy OF access were named it looks as
II the people would favor it.
lSanta Ana Evening Blade.1
The proposition to remove the CapitaI
OF California from Sacramento to san
Jose, to be submitted to the people at the
next general election as a constitutional
amendment, will be voted down by an
overwhelming majority, at least outside
OF San Francisco and the country ada
cent to the San Francisco Bay. That Dor
ton north of the Carquinez Straits and
all south of Tehachapi Pass will vote
against 1t from selfish motives-the north
because. it will take the Capital from its
present;central point. and the south for
the reason that division of the State is
being looked forward to.
10 move the Capital to San Jose would
be to sidetrack it again, beside GIVING
this end OF the State additional reason
for urging division OF the State and the
creation OF southern California. Whom
the gods wish to destroy they first make
mad" and Northern California's wrangle
over this movement will result in hasten
ing the day when two CALIFORNIA; will be
created out of the one great State as it
now exists.