The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1893-09-27

W would make q charge against any
Senator or membe of the House.
Il do not want to couiine 1t To one Sene-
tor or one member" said Mr.. Stewart. amid
laughter. Investigate them if you dare"
Il will" replied Dir. Palmer. whenever
the Senator brings forward q charge
against any individual In the Senate. l
Will vote Tor an investigation"
hen make n criminal charge against
a particular individual" said Mr.. Stewart.
contemptuously. the Senator fr ON Illinois
Will allow il TO be investigated. but be will
not protect the honor of mis- executive IN
denying these Wholesale charges. He
wants me 10 make O criminal charge against
q Senator"
Mr. Palmer wanted TO ask another aues-
ton. but Sir. Stewart declined to be inter-
rupted by that kind of stuff. / will not
make personal charges when the air is full
OF them.
They are very windy" Mr. Palmer man
aged 10 insert.
Yes. they are very windy" repeated Mr..
Stewart- They blow down on a good
many members and Senator'S" Laughter.
He then had read a long article from the
San Francisco Examiner. commenting on
the course OF the President. Mr.. Stewars
closed his speech for the day with q pas
sionate indictment of England as o mon
ster that stalked through the country
breaking down the interests of even States
and territories; that claimed TO direct the
legislation of Congress and whose voice
nau been heard last week on the east front
OF the Capitol rebuking the Senate
Dir. Morgan rose To q personal explana-
ZION. lettering TO an article In the new
York Times of to-day. that no honorable
Democrat could listen TO that part of Sen.
ator Stewards speech criticising the Presi-
dent, and continue TO act with him In Oh
structinV repeal. ~"unless, as We fear. IS the
case with Senator Morgan, he is 80 implao-
able and unreasonable an enemy OF the
President that he subordinates the highest
nKrA g .-N ~ La n~.A 90
the qualification of private revenge"
There was an Imputation, said Mr.. Morgan.
that be was the enemy. personally and po-
litlcally. of the President OF the United
TeciprOcated that feeling. he was very
happy TO state that zen tbe Presidsns
and himself there existed the most cordial
personal relations: they had always ex-
listed. and be hoped they ever would. The
history OF Mr.. Cleveland illustrated some
of the finest properties of American charnc-
ter. He differed with Mr.. Cleveland
upon some OF his views Of public policy. He
thought he differed with him upon no ques-
ton vital TO the country or the Democratic
party. They differed upon measures of
policy only. In fact he very much doubted
whether the differences between the Presi-
dent and himself were of any very material
character. IT he understood what really
were the Presidents opinions and hopes In
respect TO the present imbroalio. With
that statement MIR. Morgan thought he was
entirely justified in saying that the New
York Times. in this particular article.
playe ed the part sim ply of a mischief
maker. There was no occasion for that
paper 20 take him up and bring him and
the President together in this irritating
and unfortunate attitude with respect to
each other. which, if Explained, the
country might regard as truthful. whereas
1t was simply and malirlOusly false.
Mr.. Voorhees, then defended the Presi-
dent. as stated above. The Senate inn
mediately afterwards went into executive
session aud soon adjourned.