New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1893-06-20

-..,tv much everything in Germany ho "o
-, first OF all the army, and the preSeh. ~ So"
~ compulsory service and TO aoohs" 'o :.1
,rithout which the army cannot DC '',n.
rhov care not if the Empire be left deiehceic'''
osl,od Il he thought the Socialists carrie" VI"
their propogand on great scare Il, Wv aai.,;s,.
rl.nd mr. at least IN London where Soclaiis.s
.nlst for the purpose, ana where '''
horses freouentcd by the Guards arc ''io ,i0.
ou.rt.rs and pulpits Of SOCIALIST uiiu "'a,
missionaries. lie thought it was not 50 III IN Al"
Tho Garrison of BciSn is collected iIo,i ''' ,.,
,bn Empire The men from Oo'osnr nov. '
.vmpathy with the Pomeraniahs' NV p''
p...., do NOT fraternize in such matters III
there be q danger it wouiu pc' io' sa
,Iaobure. where the Socialists are strong anu "
,nr rocir,cnt might be poisoned BY oocial-
;sm So might others. =,
~ Ia n,rtiality for Russia came out IN 'he
,bat whatever might be Germany
io"I ~. from Socialism. they would never bc as-
.,a from any Russian source. ms IN answer
hi"' ,.stion whether, if Socialistc agitation
" "' corrosive and disturbances arose IN uer-
49, ber neichbors east and west, might hot
'a tho occasion 10 attack her. Bat his 1aith IN
a.. good faith of the Emperor of Russia was not
- he shaken The state of things Ill hussi'
soe,ned 10 him to forbid such snppositloh' Inc
Marty Of discomfort whether you call II Socahso vi
Anarchist, or Nhist is much the same every ""eic'
Iii u a danger to Germany, 1t Is equally u"nS''
% Russia: perhaps a much greater danger Inc
Gar is not the man TO lend a hand 10 'he enc
mics of order, of society. 1t was hardiy "or'"
while. after such declaration as that to press
The military point of view. AS 10 frahce' anu
what she might do in similar clrcums' ahces'
Prince bismarck omitted to express any opinion
The world knows we'll enough already what MS
views are of the political methods that nave u"r-
ing his time, been i'll vogue In that country lhcie
is no reason suppose he has changer these views
Author as he Is of that universal SUFFRAGE
which he gave because it could not he WITHHELD
Prince Bismarck's faith in the specifics OF modern
Rodicalsm. or of modern Democracy, has very
definite limits He repeated in different form
one or two remarks made during his Journey last
YEAR at Jena and elsewhere; which go 10 the
roof. of things: Radical in that sense only. No
hodv over doubted that he believed it the busl-
MAS of a government to govern: MAXIM which
padicalsm both in Germany and IN England Is
doing IFS utmost TO discredit. But how are No"
~ cot your governing Governments What Il II
% he who are TO compose 1t? There Has grown
mn If late said Prince Bismarck, NOTION lha'
the world can be governed from below lha'
.,nrot be 1t is an apOthegm when, social
il and Anarchist and those political parties II
al countries which hope for power by panderine
20 the mob. may consider. Mr.. Gladstone himself
might reflect on it, should lie find time anna Ms
n,ss.rt somewhat eng1ossing, and perhaps some
what confusing, occupations NJ
I'm this view of Socialism, as in all Prince Ds
narck said two traits were visible. lie was per
fectlv ready 10 own mistake If he thought III
had made one, and he was perfectly loNai u NM
self and his policy when he stii' ceheNco hin
self in the right: no matter what turn events Vi
opinion had taken. l doubt whether the opium
Of Others ever gave him much concern except /"
a force to be calculated and used or o'her"i'
dealt with To infallibility, however, he new
made the least pretension. lie ala not claim
for himself, nor respect the claim when mace 10
another lie sc0ncd at il. lie listened "i'h ap
proval 10 the remark which-rghtly or wrongly
! am not sure-I attributed 10 Newman IN mos
honorable days when Newman stood out aeains
the new Papal hcre-y of m!aNinlilN. b'i''
irsallibility can have any logi0a. biSl> or ro'n
rule of conduct, you must not Only De ih'aiii"'
but irfalbly certain you are lnlalio!e'
gathered that Prince Bismarck sun CONSIDERS
he was right in entering upon S'uss'
with the Papacy; that the kuiturKamPi was
soura no|icv: that the May laws were we'll con
conflict and his compromise with the Pope AM
the I-ltramcntanc party were the result OF event
which he WIS not bound TO iorcsce, and could no
have forcsccn, and which nobody in fact did fore
soc. In other words, he entered upon the s'ruS
ola with n GOOD probability of success, and ulti
,natclv surrendered to the inevitable. Inc POI
icv of conflict was wise one when adopted, an
the policy of retiring from the conflict WIS ais
wise The stress of politics, the necessities oil pun
lie life. forced him to play off one party asain'
another--no new thing with him, inGeed-an
finally to purchase support from the cannon
party BY concessions to Catholic demands Whe
the May laws were passed, their passage was III
peratve-tliey were what Germany at that momei
most needed Vixen they were repealed, oth'
objects. ONLY 70 be attained by consenting to the
repeal had become paraniount-tley. and no long
the May laws, were what Germany thea mo-
needed u W. D.
THE SEIUL CONCERTS.