The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1893-07-29

This matter comes here Oh > duly
allowed bail u exceptions from tho
Circuit Court Ok tho kiTst Great,
Nav FERN, 1893. The defendant was
charged vita larceny. ana the jury
rendered 2 verdict OF guilty. Tue Do
fen,lsut excepted 20 the verdict -
bsip.. eoatrsry To the laW and the
evidence. and moved icr new triai.
Pho ta9tion was ogaFFnied and an
exception taken and allowed TO the
UllBs
phs defendants counsel contends
that this - 1aiv . case OF suspicIOu,
bat after q fair consideration OF tue
evidence aiduced, Ws ars OF the
0otni1o that Il : 8 case d very strong
cirrens.aGtiaI evidence. The evi-
deucs for. the prosecution il 70 the
nature Of the coin stolen, and that
found n d place where lt had been
sscrsted by defendant, the actions OF
Defendant during tho DAY On winch
the com was stolen, her conduct
when the officers we're searching her
house. and after they left, her great
anxfeSv 70 hide TINS money II another
,iaee,. which coin sae had had sacreted
behind picture "a her house, aud
officers IN their search, her lrsC hid
ing Il un6er hex house, anu shortly
after moving Il 70 2 place unuer the
steps 1f another house, winch was
1nOccuuied, aud wnsu the conn was
afterwards discovered, she not pro
testing against lis being taken, Or
even claiming Il at the Station House,
all Doint strongly 70 her guilt We
might 20 On iudeiinlteiv setting out
points Of evidences bearing On her
yuIit. In the defendants own tsStI-
mouv zas positively denies facts
winch we're ciear5v established oy the
witnesses FOR she prosecution n
many rez.arJis hsr evidence. n our
JuiuIou. tends more 70 Strengthen the
case FOR the prosecution than 20
vvzaLetr (. The va-UiIct = vail sJIs-
taIuesI Ev the evidence. anu va there-
fure decline N Disturb Il. On these
ezruuntIs- Il has been neid many
times nv tins Court THAT where there
= evidences 70 Justify OF support j
ve-riicr. Il can u0t % sat aside i
r1r1ruFlzE 1f those c1sas are reDorreI
n Vth Hay-. Rel
The uext exception argued = n
regard 70 the Court cansEIr-ng M
Cores Tor leaving the Court roam
during the time witness was helug
axanlueEf and talking with the Wit
ra=sa= 1T1t=5rfe. SAID witnesses being
avcir1-trsf from the C0TIrT roOn Under
he ME. the ides being that Cores
vzas COMMUNICATING 20 the excluded
Witnesses -7l2I the witness on ne
stand vas tesEITy1ng TO IL appeafs
rom the bill OF exceptions and me
clerks uJtes and record Oh me pro
Csaesfiuus that the Courts attention
-zEs called 70 COTreg'5 cOud1ct- me
carson whom Cores vas seen
talking TO vas called INTO Cour1
ri IN The uresauca OF the JURY vas
examined - 20 what CORES 1fttI 5SiId
RI MIN and The Cont then sald' Il
GO "a ne thst Mr. CJrre8 lbs gone
..,7tIreiv bzroud what = right n +
,-zea NJ his kind and / take tue %
,-4s5or7 DgvT OF adm0GIsdlng If- O9f
pa never "a do anything o. me A. Oh
-~-,5r@ go exception vas taken 70
- domination Of this witness nor
-, -.,74rnarfz Of the Cont 81 JdHt
zine ont 4lts.- the noon recess SUCH
,-.z.,si.,r7 vsa= taken oat dIsa!lo|eSi
lie Cl1rr as taken TOO ate "a
v5h7ca ruling counsel Tor ds'etl's'u'
z~eaoFeei and the exception vas ~
T-.z5e.5 Immediately following this
srother 4 vesti CATION vas n2d = q
80 C.-rr1s lsd said 10 witnesses
80 oad not yet been called, ~ r.
-..-5 To tils. examination Of = ceT "a q
1890 +he4 mad testified Before
- C,9nrt. proceeded with tons InVes'
.-.i.,~ ~. sr7r- were -zcnssd from
.iSe--C,ro. and he iUvestig atIon zoos
go onk OF be presence sI'd near u :
- he 7ury. Defendant coo''Ssl
..y--,1r Honor wIl4 allow me- 20
80. IN s-e70fiOn 20 these proc@ed
4rrns the tendency Of tnl1
"a moved he CoHrt 20 mod
.s-oaTlzs 81 caDaure OF l1r
80 The norton Wa denied and
lotion vas 5s6su and aiio0ed
S-r4 ming that The exception
-I5---a1 -hould apply only 70 tof
.l ~ The Court 20 modify rs
--. ~ aid Correa and me Conr'
.r-7os exception = TO the ruling
- - -te nstteT ot the inves'i
+D.- g, =, -yhich defendant ronnsa
sssi va The juFy having 20
I -, -Fafr. seats the Cont said
..C1~4l a~feT1 OF att@ s''
vc1 -hat after ln'es'' 800 - -. =,
-C5qineed that there hs5 o''sn ~
-t;-o7detion either On ne paf5 %
lnt''li ..---..-tir.o o., the defense
ln< r j. conten3ed thst these
.....;orz and he ca1sT1rs d
- 1r the Conrf tended 20 pre-
C' -. .Ia defendants ea7s. w
TO-, 800 hov tbis co7ld 20. TIE
es .l-'Isnt Or her counsel ned nOi
a9.s -. ..srs1re5. only ibis yoTDe
Tho q Is ssid vas -
~ IT, defendants co7nssi H
- "a attorney IF thet Cont
he remarks q the Co1rf bed
~ wav D,eiHdiesd the minds o.
-. sr,,7 N the morning. csrts'nly y:
1910 IN the afternoon, after the
.sosipsetion % The Investigation osd
- g,sd md the iuFT recalled 70 theii