Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1893-05-24
PART Two

IN that light To ala tNs,rali snl ~. Il
caswcll thcreunon nadr IN .n ~,
Proposition. '"''h
That he would take an Tho SHOno nnt.,
aud the note for 81 tpai'tpl AM, Ni ', w
1891, and N,onih nox Nv, S,n W, '' ~ -,
l, which tho said Smlih arr,,.d ~, Nv 10y NY
&. vidcd thar said t'a.,y,ii y'n,tJ No., Ky.
written asrcelnrnt thaf Ky ,.oni,t . NV,
alHiin plead usurlou. lnt.rcs, "n ~.
bank. when sud S2Os,fs, mat,,rcd nm ,h,,
FIRST Of duly. Aud thnt soid Cn.,,a X Nh
enter into said agreement MA hanna !, , nv
self not ~ pLstd u,nrv vhn,' .a,d 0,,, in'''
SsO,aI0 should fnll Auc ~ IN M, " ~
July, 1Sa3, nv rcnscn AZ seid ail.,., ~ "
Phrc-sail casu.ru .. ~, IL sini,n nnn
edgnr that ,hc na~,,r,, e"s I'M H,knoWi-
been n,ale tS S,nIh nnd par va, '" ~ w ~
{ TO them indiyidnnliy Nsni -, 49, n,l"lN
Of the bank. and not IN, M ~ isu o'Hs', v
the bank and the bnnL nn, ~ s' 49, ~
him as much even a. ths tnns1 1880
interest ON nm, ~ sslI r,rI,a ~ VI
represented bv him ~" i"uep'Vnh'"s
That an ths tlth 40 A.. -, ~, :,
Z paid said nofc AZ All ANN n, sN.n NaNwsii
10th day III Nnv ,,"i1 a"u ~ me
I SiOun, both IA fun 1,hnt ,,.fan'tn,,t "
] 10 nttnch,s- mnrt,t e.. ILlIaHi,n",'a hvt'',
l niade d nnrt h,rene 81, ,a.i, "l ~ ana
Z we'll cxnlnn,t,,r, ~ ~" s' :" sun vas
ments VI '"e tor'ko'hs aver
That when Tho ori,,,o, n.,.,,,. 49,.
commenced and s.iJ lnJ.1,,,I,,''.a. sosv
Mrs, Sallie Human nnI ,bs H. rom
Implement c1mnnny "nu ~. iunhnN
SlOlOO. that nm ,,ir' "u'i'." ~ Aunut
OF unaarnea infs,. ,'' ....'i hltv SUM
eotintiona v,rr,, MA l., Nv W." .. F'l" ny
note Tor $50 ma i, , rvispVo 70 nnlu
amount Of unearnnl intns',s vu a., niks
said arrangement for rchntc ~ snnnn
Sssoo NV vera s''is nn, inr rebate, Of
fnct. thai dn,in,, H., v .., ~ Viht
m,liatrlv folia,si,,, '"N,'n mouths iln-
paid 10 the hnnp IN n,,,, us'r W.
original lnaebte,inea. saa ~. I, " u
from TINA la I'm. ,.,1,,.t - ." " WNH
OOO '''"' a"'u' SiV'-
FORTY frat Eurtb,n. .,,.,,..,i. ~,
petition tiefrnlart ss,s H., Iuu
that large nart NJ IN, ss.st. 'il'u
PENDANT bank rorslata AZ ,c,es ~, a..
IN suit, the validity Of which h.i,',
denied and rnniest,,l /, n ~ u's
the state bnt J,fnnI,nf l'.nt 'v n,.T "t
collection Of said noies Ia h,,,,, s.at.,,n
aud contested ON account III XXI, r,,sn,,
NJ nntaTuui4m existing h,twrcn ,h,. nf
Beers OF said hauk and lts iehtors ,n1
u denies that on account OF any snch
alleged antagonlsm Tho Nditistrn"g, s,,,i
settlement VI said claims n nrrvsn,nI
but It believes and. thrrcfbre 49,,
that the men who an, r,,sis1ng IA, n,,
ihent Of said debts aud tho rcJncins az
said debts to Judgment wnnld mnLp sneh
tNNllAhif irrespective of tho fnunnuit
mcnt Of snid bank, lnnsmneh sSalI
claims nre honest and jnsf ,ieht. mi
ihusr Who are resisting the cnfnr,etn,'nf
OF lurlf collection were Afforded pyorx
opportunity TO pay them hnforr snlt Nm.
instituted thereon, That said hank bns
spI only urop such claims as il failed
hliyr importantly and delay TO colieri
without suit
.t,tv' ~ lWn' fnriher answering said ~.
lul,n, uWrhdhut denies that said Pare
WIN wv. NlnNn are cnnsplrng together and
W., WIZ timer Htockholdcm to secure their
~ "ii'p .nhVe anu Tue continuance Of A
lunkott IN Office and the election a.
u VIM n majority Of whom would
IvlVu 20 ". polcy anl demands Of said
,snln Allli i,pF" W order TINT said Smith
wy ana Luckcit should receive ths
pnnl,- mentioned aud To enable sail
p.n 70 urlirrinir the value Of the stock
W tlvse llhlhllns and other stockholders
99H lNr share AMI lessi on The contrary
u3,nuuht hl'eFrs that the reason WHY
Hpin N.Y. smith nnd l.uckett have btrn
upn,lnneu w once u that ihey are A.
n, vHlFaul. 70 thr uirecior Of said corpora
i ti"n w" 20 = Mrgr inh1oriiy " the stock
ilulvvl. owning anu controlling large
inAlorIidy o. Inc shares Of stock, That
l"lniinH themselves have ncqnpscrd
~ ihr 'onununnee OF said pnyo,
'hli'h And lstieketi II office by failing 10
i' vi "tv,nh W nave held an annual
u"lluk OF me atoekhnldtfH OF said bank
y January, lSoi, and take steps Ion The
ll".hon OF Other officers In their stead
y, lhoy Meiu Objectionable TO plaintiffs.
! nat while u u true that down 10 this
lmn snii smith and Luckstt have lpan
continued Ia their said oilices on acrouut
u iheir bong acceptable 10 the directors
u lhn corporation and "a n large majority
p ~ sipckholdcre, owning a large iua.
9rili o. its shAtes Of STOCK, atill u N not
lV deHirn rithcf ~ the directors or VI tho
iorklpldriH 70 contiliue eaid Smith aud
diohrtt Ia Office longer tlian Is necessary
or the winding w " the nfiia VI the
'orpornuon, That Indicating the desire
'nl purpose of the directors Of said bank
aid directors held meeting on the 10Th
lay Of Mny, 1888, aud then passed
stating TINT all along Il had
'een the settled policy Of the now maui
,ypmrnl 20 pay OF ns rapidly rs pos
lille tie banks Indebtedness 20 the end
Z q hnal liquidation; stating that ~
abilities proper having been very nearly
net In full and paid on that tho bonr,I
directors will at the earliest moment
make Recommendation Ia AZ.
with lts said object Of liuiida-
ON aud stating that tho nense of the
leoiing was not only that the best In