The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1893-10-24
YHE NEV CALENDAR.
Chief Justice Zane Disposes of a
Long List of Gases.
THE UNION PACIFIC SUED.
Albert Mics Arraigned for Criminaliy
AssauIting Clara Frazer.
i. C. Pender Gets Divorce-suIt for
Commission on Loan-Light Day in
the Probate Court-Vin Krolow
Goes Free.

Chief Justice Zane took up the law
and motion calendar yesterday morn
ing, and heard and determined a
long list of cases as follows:
Francis Fritscn ct al. VS.. Mary +.
Dalton ct al; demurrer to complaint
overruled; ten days to answer.
G. R. Bathewell ct al. VS.. Archie
Frain ct al; demurrer to complaint
overruled and ten days to answer.
A L. Pollock VS.. Chicago, Burling-
ton & Quincy Railway company; mo
ton to dismiss appeal argued; leave
to file new bond in five days.
James NJ. Dart ct al. VS.. .Luinse;
demurrer overruled.
Eureka Hill Mining company vs.
Bullion Beck and Champion Mining
company; demurrer withdrawn and
ten days to answer.
Utah Commercial and Savings bank
VS. L. c. Hardy ct al; demurrer sus-
tanned
Margaret Kelly ct al VS.. L. w
Clark ct al; demurrer to complaint
disposed of.
r. II. Sherman VS.. G. W. Jenkins
ct al; demurrer TO complaint over
ruled
Rachel Hamlin VS.. George Hamlin;
demurrer sustained; ten days allowed
to answer.
Hibbard. Spencer, Bartlett & Co. VS..
F. J. Mclaughlin ct al; demurrer sus-
tanned; ten days given to amend.
Rachel AIcMaster vs.. Sarah A. Hard
ing: dismissed without prejudice.
White River Land and Live Stock
company VS.. r. / Burraston (twc
cases.. Motion to retaX costs with
drawn and motion for new trial ar
gued and submitted.
T. J. Mcfarland ct al. VS.. j. 2. Bog
giss ct al; on stipulation demurrer
was overruled and twenty days given
to answer.
William Simpkins VS.. Andrew Mink
ct al; demurrer argued and sub
BENJAMIN johnson VS.. NJ. c. Fox ct
al: judgment on report of referee. for
plaintiff.
Edward L. Burton VS.. Edward
Rushton ct al: Judgment for plaintiff
on report Of referee.
c core H. Brown, assignee, VS. Nat
NJ. Brigham ct al; demurrer over
ruled.
John Joseph ct al VS.. Olof Shrug-
ren; demurrer overruled by consent;
fifteen days allowed to answer
Perrin Bros VS. Jack Bolton ct al;
this matter was dismissed.
w. D. Annier VS.. ]. A Morlan ct al;
leave given to amend complaint.
Wasatka Mineral Springs company
VS.. Theodosia Cook ct al; demurrer
withdrawn.
First National Bank of Deadwood
vs.. John w. Taylor ct al; leave given
until June ?, 1894. to answer
Rebecca B. Carter VS.. the Salt Lake
Ruilding and Loan association ct al;
leave given to file amended cross-com-
plant.
Jacob E. Bamberger vs.. Jas. Hague
ct al; demurrer withdrawn; fifteen
days to answer.
lions Savings Bank and Trust COM
pany VS.. NJ G. Cochrane ct al; demUr
Ter to complaint overruled; ten days to
answer.
P. ]. Davlin VS.. R. W. Mccartney ct
al: motion to set aside default and
open judgment overruled.
Bang & Mayer VS.. Berets, Doan q
Co.; judgment for plalntlH by consent
for $500 and costs.
Salt Lake Building & Manufacturing
association VS.. W. P. O'Meara ct al;
motion to confirm report OF referee and
motion for new trial; the latter motion
was overruled and thirty days given to
file statement on appeal.
Utah Commercial & Savings bank VS..
the Pacific bank; default; judgment for
plaintiff for $2,374.4O
L. L. Fender VS.. Hannah Pender: mo
ton for alimony Withdrawn.
Z. A. Jeff VS.. Rio Grande Western
Railroad company; motion for new
trial overruled.
w. S. Mccormick VS.. Chas. Denhalter;
demurrer to complaint overruled.
10 !, -. IL a.
nurrer to complaint sustained.
Utah National bank VS.. Geo. G. Kid
der Ell al; judgment for plaintiff by
consent; attorneys fees $3.50.
Fred II. Bemis VS.. w. H. Cromer ct
al; demurrer to complaint sustained
and ten days to amend.
Salt Lake city VS.. John Beck ct al !;
passed.
w n. Walker vs. Salt Lake CITY
Railway company; demurrer to COM
plant argued and submitted.
Maxine Surault VS.. JOS. a. Bush; de-
murrer TO supplemental answer sus-
tanned and ten days allowed to amend
Albert J. White VS.. w. Z. Ryan; de-
murrer overruled and twenty days to
answer.
Martha Ann Coombs VS.. the Utah
Paint & Oil company; referred to Judge
Bartch.
Minnie A. Morley VS.. Frank Morley:
motion for alimony granted and SIS per
month allowed, with costs in the sum
Of SIS.
VIM. Schauflein VS.. Henry Wagner ct
al; demurrer withdrawn and thirty
days to answer
thomas F. NIulloy assignee VS.. Mar
tin Painers; demurrer to amended
complaint overruled and fifteen days
to answer.
II. z. Chalmers VS.. A A Willis: de-
Ilurrer overruled and twenty days to
answer.
o. NJ. West ct al VS.. A. REYNOLDS ct
al; demurrer overruled and twenty
days to answer.
~. H. Fuller VS.. Elizabeth Spencer
ct al; demurrer overruled and ten
days to answer
O. A. Woolley VS.. Charles E. John
son ct al; same order.
NJ. ]. Jones VS.. William MCQUEEN eft
al demurrer to Intervention argued
and submitted.
John c. Davis ct al VS.. Salt Lake
Building and Loan association; de-
nurrer withdrawn as to second cause
of action.
c. Balzaratt ct al. VS.. Montreal
Mining and Smelling company: mo-
ton TO strike out answer overruled.
Connecticut River National bank VS.
Joseph Rawberry ct al: motion for
judgment and demurrer overrllled and
ten days to answer.
Moline State Savings bank VS.. VIII
liam Ditchfield; demurrer withdrawn
and ten days to answer
Stephen Hays ct al. VS.. S. S. Groes-
beck ct al; decree of foreclosure in
favor Of plaintiff by consent.