New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1893-01-11
WHAT TIE POPE INTENDS TO DO.
rxrRrssroNs OF OPINION ON THE SCHOOL
QUESTION DEMANDED FROM ALL
cr.rrpAcAS BISHOPS
sr,pFRAGAN BISHOPS.

Washington. Jan. 10 speclap. The news dispatches
,,,s mornIuc announced that the Rome correspondent
| of a Now York weekly had received the following
| nrho popo has sent a letter directing th- Amer
NJ, rnscnn.t. IN carefully examine and consider thc
,ur,een propozitions submitted at the conference VI
| The Archblsaops at tho meeting IN WV Vt" III
November last by Archbishop saiolli ana make "ha'
80 rn-,.cr,ons they NAV deem advisable and forward
| them 70 Rome"
! WIEN this WIS shown by The Tribune correspond
ont to one OF the faculty at the Catholic n'ers"'
| -, .n,.h. "What 4. true In that statement Is
| certainly not new: what Is new In II Is unq'Ilneo'S
| false , ,,-
| m. comment made by the paper receiving 'h'
,.us wos ~ follows: This dispatch el''ctnaiN
| :, -. y, o.. assertion that has been repeatedly
made that the Archb shops approved OF the prrop,'
| don .. submitted The ArchblShops VIII carc'"'N
rc,,sc them individually ard submit Their '"rr'''"
| privately 20 Rome .,..o.
urh,t Is MISC absolutely false said III" professor
and the probability Is that the dispatch h'N'' "
| from Rome but Manufactured III NJ" ,o W
| ,lcIou,Iv concptcd I, throw discredt on the arc"
h,aons ~ the United states. ana 10 h'u'r"hN' VI"
| -, -, al ,ro dIsputclcs which have recently 'oH''
| ,, q, ou,lmrl,otivc sonrc" In Rome. IL Is sinPS
| amazing that such a bar,faccd attempt sh"''u !" ~
to sustain the work Of those opposing '"' NV" "
| ho IIolv sc. They must certainly know 'h"' d
| statement Ike. thI, would be contrado'ra ny Wv
| official evidence now common P'"P''' :" '
| paper Office In the country , A.
| ,,r. ara, tho facts: ON January the cabl" dls
| ,o,.s srununccd that the Holy 80" hai J"ot ~
| ,vd . fr., report from Archbishop Sa'oh r''"''"s
,o the In,ptcs,ons prodnccd IN the 'nlt'n S,''s w
IN. conference Of the Archbish"I's III Ne" ,"i"'
| Vatican was much surprised ~ tue opp .
~ =, l.. shown TO the results Of III" conference" ana
| Inc propo,ais Of MonNignor SatoIli. ne rope "'"
| 1,n.i p,muolla and LedochOwshi were di'pI'aS'0
| 49,, ia, Uov Father authorized the statement tha'
| go ,,,u,d soon take important action cOhSr'hH Wv
] ,c,totion I'm America. Just hlDnt 'Ha' UNIV '''"
| ienor sstolu's mall brought To Inn from '''"''''
| R,mpolla the documentary PROOF 'ha' "'''" "'N W
| h.cin n, once. The mall which lett the "'N''iN
on .t .po cnrried TO every Bishop OF the Catholic
| Church I'm the United states command from NV
uo,v Father issued through his ALLOCATE. requiring
| n u,sho, Immediately 10 examine the fourteen
,o,o.,ic proposltions approved by the ArchbiShops
-, the council held In Monsgn0r Corrigans residence
| In New-YOrk In November lust. IN" S'a''''"' WIS
Given out day or two thereafter 10 inc e"'c' 'n'
Archbishop Saiol instead OF being recalled US one
| uoi,u n,ner had said was bc the case. had Just
| received such new Instructions "a compie'eN prf-
cluded the possibility Of his recall They were SO
framed ~ Ia make his previous orders more eflcaclos
#, c,rrvur ont the Holy Fn;hcT's intention In sending
him TO fine United states To harmonic ire anir' VI
ie Church IN their relation 10 oar p'il'lca' i">"'o
uous one OF the facts then disclosed was 'ha' us
c,ssion mon the merit OF The fourteen proponii"h'
yos a, an end and NIonSIgnor Saioli's Instructions
| meant thut the schcmr h. T. carry out WAS 10
200 t,,, this was an accomplished fact. n was the
nr,ccol part Of his work and was To begin al once
| =. Now We hive the statement sOwn broadcast
,Ircur,u fine country that ell thes, things are false
| ,I,,t fin. Archbishop, are TO make whatever corcc-
,lo,. tbey may deem advisable and forward them 70
Damn. anil Tint the report given by ArchbSh0ps Ryan
aud Cortigon Of what the council did In November was
misleading II not untrue. Instead therefore OF the
,tchli.hops now having the privilege Of making cor
r,ctIons that they may deem advisable. II Is under
-tocd that they exhausted their privilege TO suggest
| ~ the November council
| :. The cnlir new, from Rome yesterday, confirms
| ali Inv. lust said The Vatican has caused an in
AMIR, +, Ie made into the motives and the extent of
| tho onuo.itIoo TO the satO ,iOn said the cable
| dlsnn,ch Sow how Is this TO De- done MonsignOr
| ,otou by order %! the Pope las sent printed cops
u. ,bc pnrtin's orders 10 every Bishop in the United
states IN the effect that within the month Of Jan
| nary lob without bias and without consultation
vith any other Bishop hs shall In conscience forward
J 10 the Holy Father direct under his episcopal seal
inst whst the Bishop thinks Of the fourteen scholastic
p-oposions adopted and approved by the Archbshops.
Each Bishop Is TO give his opinion without fear
| Now Il will naturally he asked what does al this
| meant II means that the Vatican has taken tbs
| ,tcp TO impress upon the American hierarchy TINT
Archbishop Sato.l has come TO the United states as
tbs ALLOCATE the Holy Father. and that hcnceforth
no will communicate his instructions and orders not
n the mcropoltans as has hitherto ben the custom
6ut through his NunclO resident In this country. 1t
| Is mart OF the gossip of the time that some very