New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1893-02-14

nr,rc,rr,s INSTRUMENTATION
DIyArY DEVELOPMENTS PROMISED
fpY TELEGRAPH TO THE TRIpuSE.'
WaelIncton Feb. l3.-lt Is und'ts'oou u. VI"
Ito rrivorsv that the course OF Bishop Wisser Ill Tue
oos. NJ Il Tbomas's Church at Bhyonhe ''' "
c.ntcd bv Archbishop Sutolli as open contempt .o m
o,ho-ttr a. an ApostoIic Delegate. and That haV'"s
m,blisbed MI order to the rtctors OF st. ne"is '
& Mary, churches In direct variance VIII "'' ~
mand Bishop Wiggcr viii r adJuoeeo s,''s "
tempt Of the Holy Sac unless lie ih''""' Wv"
niles with the crler OF the Apostolic De's',o '"u %
nr,,iclv makes rcparation for the act lie mas coi,
,,' rna Co,houc eeccsiastics here familiar with
Cha noxoppo difficulty were advised week ago 'na'
pishop Wirrcr's action would not be IN accoru WIN
m. order Of Archbishop eatolii. VII reoiu'
Father Ahne the pastor Of 81. heNr! C',
novonne. in q long interview printed III No""
paper. IS quoted rs saying ,, ,,,.,od
Won can further say that the dispatch Pup'i'','"
from Washington this morning purpornhg 10 CIV.
voricnor sotos decision Is not altogether True anu
,hot the alleged decision Is false, especially i" 'e
sixth secton concerning myself. ,,
,h pulJcotion in The Tribune to-day OF Blshop
Wlqg.r's letter to Father Anne ana fatoer n'eo'''
inst rs II was read by them to their reSpecu't 'o'
rroc,,lous Yesterday by order Of the BISHOP IS '"e
frat positive evidence received here OF IN"
- rat,cr .bne,s assumption concerning the future Oh
:, rt,m,ss Church and the cause OF two OF fa'her
Kill,n's charges against Bishop Wiggcr' III W." "
tho order issued yesterday TO the pastors OF d. '
ard St. lIenrys churches, so entirety "t N'',a','
,ci.h thc decision Of the Apostolic Delegate. IL Is
nronar IN say that the six point, gwen In tlis c"i
.nondenco ON the morning Of February we're dc'a'u
hy ArclIdshop Satol TO his acting secretary on the
evening Of February g. Immediately aluer pi9'op
Wlggcr had signed his name to the ore,hhi orue' anu
mar no CAV, them with the full understanding mat
they were to b. printed throughout the country anu do
his full and final decision In the Bayonne case
since therefore, the parish priest at ST. Henry's IN
Rovonno saw proper to declare publicly that the oe-
i,on of Monsenor Satoi not altogether true ana
that II was only alleged d cisloh ana iaiSe To-
pcclaly in one important particular, those III inc con
ndcnca Of tho Apostolic Delegate say they were ho'
,rpri sod a, tie tenor Of Father Ahnes statement iur
n.bcd Yesterday or at the contents OF the letter OF
Bishop WIcgcr. ,.o
When the ordinary Of the Newark diocese was before
the Apo.toc Delegate the IisOp was required 10 give
his written promise chat, with the least possible ueis
ne would issue "A circular to every priest III lid
diocese declaring that his previous order toroiii"s
the ,acramcnts TO parents who sent thelr chhu'ei'
o public schools. 10 children VINO auehdeo Such
schools. wa, revoked 1t Is now understood here mat
m,bop Vic,cr has no intention whatever Of comply
ing with that promise. ii" holds, 1t l. sain' '"h'
the fourteen scholastic propositions promuish'eu U,
Archbishop ,atol are only his personal Views ana
entitled To no more weight than the opinion on any
Bishop Wige'r maintains that the Sovereign PohuH
has himself assumed the entire responsibility for these
scholastic propositions. and having asked the views
4 Bishop Wlggcr their merits, In connection WIN
the Views of every bishop in the Cathohc Aerarcny'
mn'l the Pope Issues his cncyclcal TO The bishops
Of the Catholic Church In the United STATES Tue
Views Of Archbishop sato are of no particular value
and mat hi, order bishop cannot BE- 1uesuoheu
or reversed by the Apostolic Delegate.
pnipt NJ S1tOlliS
furnished the representative OF The Tribune on Feb
ruary > read n follows a new parish Il formed OF
the two churches OF 81. Thomas and ST. Henry. the
church Of ii. Thomas being III" principal. and the
church OF -. Henry being the subordinate
Bishop WiGgcr says In lis letter to father Anne
that he will De- the rector OF this new parish ana the
congregation will worship in 81. lIenry's Church.
Monsignor satoll's order to Bishop wlgger provides
that the church OF ST. Thomas shall be restored and
r.opcncd aud Sundays and holy DAYS the second
and principal shall be celebrated III d.
rhomns's. Bishop WGeer says the only time mass
shall be- said In ThomaS'S IS on feast days. II 'he
CONGREGATION so wish and the pastor ch' oSes to com
ply With the request. 1t Is left by Bishop Wlgger
discretionary for Father Ahnc to do even this.
Mon,ignor satoll', nth point that all sermons
and Instructions not only In II. ThomaSS but also
In II. Hcnrys church. shall he given III the fisSh
language Bishop WGgcr says: "On sundays the
rector VIII preach In English at the first mass ana
I'm English German at the second mass aS H. n'S
done I'm the past or In other words regardless oil Clc
alleged au hority Of the Apostolic Delegate. Bisisop
Wlcg.r saws ~. Thomas's will h"nccforth BE- used
exclusively for divine service, and this step 1t was
said would have been taken without any Interference
Of tie Apostolic Delegate.
There were three priests present when Archbishop
gai1 dictated for IN, press the points OF ms oiuer
I'D bishop Wiggrr. They all witnesses 10 ,he
correctness ~ the points printed IN ihe tribune;
1li.r, WA, not the slightest MISUNDERSTANDING thit
tif a
Lain scholars not only heard them dictated In LATIN
hut they heard their English " sion repeated 10 tie
Apostolic Delegate" 49, -, ,,., A.. 80, .o,,c
ulzr Archbishop soto invested with any authority
tn dictate. what he shall shall not do, ana mas
,pcnly shown his contempt FOR MS cOnlinalas ny
ordering Father Ahne u do exncty me contrar! VI
vhni Nonsignor ~atol required should be done
certified ropy of Bishop Wigger's letter 10 Father
slime and inihcr Kccn. affected by notarial seal
hns been received by Monsignor Satolli. Rome mas
been advised by cable Of the cohteinp'ho,s ,reaue,
Archbishop Saolli's act has received and the Pubic
odilm which the conflicting orders must surely DrihE
mon the Apostolic Delegation and the Holy pee II
f.. authority and dignity are not promptly deienuco
ccive authority ih, week that may make IT unn, ts-
AIRY for the Vatican to act. lie VIII require hlshop
WIggcr forthwith TO come 10 washington ana make
Immediate answer why he shall not be adJndged
If h. does not promptly o'~y: then Rome VII be
advised suspend him from ~, fnnctoils ana order
him 10 report TO the Vatican within thirty days
The Indignation Of Archbishop Satollt at what has
and apostolic zeal to degree OF fervor surprising his
emphasis when occurring on his favorte theological
subject The conflicting statements In the Bayonne
case and the failure Of bishop Wgger to promugste
his promised crcIlnr viii develop some extraordinary
results In short Tine