Arizona weekly citizen., 1893-09-16
CIVIL CALENDAR
The Cases to BE Set for Hearing
MONDAY

4 MONDAY
The civil calendar to be made VI
Monday will include the following cases
Santa Rita Land & Mining company
vs.. M. r. Wise ct al; attorneys, F. j
Heney and Maxwell & Satterwhite.
| F. M. Main VS.. HI. o. Flipper; attor
neys, Barnes & Martin and Mercer.
| b. M. Jacobs VS.. @. Cameron, ct al.
attorneys, Maxwell & Satterwhite and
Ford.
| Colin Cameron vs.. Hildebrant; attor-
news, Ford and Barnes & Martin.
Cameron VS.. Nations ct al; attorneys,
Ford and Barnes & Martin.
Cameron VS.. Berrada; attorneys, Ford
and Barnes d Martin.
V. III. Igo vs. Gooding ct al; Lowell
( and Barnes & Martin.
Warnerkrcss VS.. V. 81. Igo; attorneys,
Herring and -
Whitelaw vs.. Jones ct al; attorneys,
Lowell and Franklin.
Rifenberg vs.. Boulder ct al: attor-
neys, Lowell and Franklin.
Rifenberg vs.. Boulden; attorneys,
Lowell and Franklin.
@. j. Roskruge vs.. j. Finley; attor-
neys, Franklin and Barnes & Martin.
Ainsa, administrator, VS.. Perrin ct al;
attorneys, Franklin and Craig & Mere
dith.
Plummer ct al. VS.. Ell Plomo Mining
81 Smelling company; attorneys, Rouse
and Honey.
J. Seaures ct al. vs.. Sol Goldbaum; at
torneys, Maxwell & Satterwhite and
Wright.
Mason ct al. vs.. Wise ct al; attorneys,
Heney and Maxwell & Satterwhite.
California Powder Works vs.. P. San
doval; attorneys. Stillwell and Maxwell
& Satterwhite.
E. B. Perrin vs.. Crittenden Land &
Cattle company; attornys, Craig & Mer-
edith and Barnes & Martin.
Aiusa, administrator, vs.. j. P. Camou
ct al; attorneys, Ford aid Herring ct al
Arivaca Land & Cattle company vs..
n. W. Bernard ct al; attorneys, Wright
III. L. Christie Vs. Finley ct al; attor- |
neys, Ford and Barnes & Martin.
III. l.. Christie VS.. Abrams ct al; at |
torneys. Ford and Anderson.
r. w. Duncan VS.. Finley ct al; attor- |
neys, Ford and -
taxon, trustee, VS.. Atkinson ct al; at |
torneys, Heney and Barnes & Martin.
IL. l.. Christie VS.. j. Andrade ct al; |
attorneys, Ford and -
F'axon, trustee, VS.. j. Plskorski; attor-
neys, Heney and Barnes & Martin.
Donau assignee. vs.. Zeckendorf,
trustee; attorneys, Franklin and Barnes
& Martin.
q. A. Hoff vs.. Mohawk Ranch COM
psny; attorneys, Heney aud Barnes &
Martin.
Faxon, trustee, VS.. Wise ct al; attor-
neys, Heney and Barnes & Martin.
John Devine VS.. 9. G. Reitz ct al; at
.orneys, Barnes & Martin and Rouse.
Sovereign VS.. j. Piskorski; attorneys,
Heney and Barnes & Martin.
P. Schaaf VS.. Burgess; attorneys, Ger
yais and Hereford.
Heney, administra tor, vs.. E. K. Sykes
It ux; attorneys, Heney and Barnes &
Martin.
Frank Miller VS.. G. @. Rsitz ct al; at
orneys, Hereford and Rouse.
Steinield VS.. w. j. Ross; attorneys,
Hereford and Maxwell & Satterwhite.
j. Ireland ct al. VS.. D. w. Boulden;
attorneys, Hehey and Franklin.
G. b. Heney VS.. T. Hughes ct al; at
orneys, Hereford and Barnes & Martin.
j. B. Girard VS.. f. W. Curry ct al; at
orneys, Franklin and Heney & Ford.
j. Speedy, vs.. A. Flores; attorneys,
Martin d SatterwhiJe and Ferguson.
s. Katzensteln VS.. j. ID. Burgess; at
orneys. Franklin and Hereford.
Antonio Soto ct al. VS.. j. S. Warner ct
H.; attorneys, Lowell and Hereford.
Maxwell VS.. W. G. Bsshford; attor-
leys, Maxwell & Satterwhite and
Wright.
University Canal company VS.. d. Val
'ncia; attorneys, Lowell and Wright.
II. Menager VS.. A. Hemme; attorneys,
Wright and Heney & Ford.
L. n. Town VS.. Heney, administrator;
attorneys. l. n. Town and -
Zeckendorf ct al: VS.. La Osa Cattle
company; attorneys, Franklin and
Wright.
III. G. Stiilman rs. w. K. Meade; at
orneys, James Reilly and Heney &
FORD.
L. P. Vankuren VS.. Mrs. L. V. Wilk-
nson; attorneys, Wright and -
Tatum & Bowen VS.. Brown Il Brown;
ttorneys, Heney & Ford and Wright.
w. n. Cummings VS.. ID. Lindsey; at
orneys, Williams and -
S. Ainsa vs.. The County OF Pima; at
orneys. Ainsa and Hereford.