The morning call. [volume] (San Francisco [Calif.]) 1878-1895, 1893-06-25

Total Liabilities. 792. $50 SO
The item of S2OO,o0O for bank premises
as an asset will have to be stricken out, as
the property mas been decided to the Pe0-
pies Home Savings Bank.
According 10 the foregoing statement the
resources of the Pacific Bank have SUI
fered shrinkage of $3.50, 1856 CO since
& January l. 1898. the date of the last semi
j annual statement to the Bank Commits
sioueTs.
Early in the day Sheriff McDade was
temporarily eujoned from interfering
with or obstructIng the possession of the
/ Bank Commissioners and the directors of
the Pacific Bank in reference to the assets,
property and premises thereof. The In
junction was issued by Judge Daingerield.
The order to show cause Is made return
) able JnSs 80
The complaint was brought in the name
OF the Bank Commissioners and of the
AttoTney-General against Sher L McDade.
Ii sets forth the status Of the Pacific Bank,
cites the closing of its doors and the TAX
I ing of possession of its affairs by the Bank
Commissioners by the advice f the Attor-
ney-General ana the Eruption of The
Sheriff The paper continues as follows a:
Plaintiffs further aege, upon and according
to their nfOl nation aud belief, thai the solvent
assets or said Pacific Bank, now III the vaults
and in the pOsSeSAiOn OF SAID badk are more
than $4,000, 600, and IL allowed 0 be controlled
by the Bans Commissioners AMI directors OF
said bank can be collected In due course Of
4 business; that the pretended WIFI or attach
ment proposed to be levied by SAID defendant,
ard by virtue OF which be proposes TO hold
possession OF said property. is Tor S2l,-
1sS O6; that II said defendant Is permitted
! TO obtain possession OF said assets OF said bank
Il viii have The effect OF preventing The colltc-
4 ton Of large proportion thereof IN due and
4 Ordinary course Of business, aud VIII cause such
+ depreciation OF The securities OF sald bank as
Will Ultimately prevent lie payment of all the
depostors OF laid Pacific Bank in full.
plaintiffs further allege, upon and according
10 their information and belief, that the defend
ant VIII. unless restrained, II opportunity ex-
LIST, cause attachments TO be levied upon the
moneys aud assets of other banks within the
city and county OF san Francisco: that
such action upon the part OF said de-
fendant VIII prevent and interfere with
plaintiffs. Bank Commissioners, In the perform
aDce OF their duties. and Will cause great and
irreparabl injury TO such banks aud 10 the
4 business community OF the State of California,
ana especially 10 the CITY and county of san
Francisco.
The prayer for the injunction was for
an order OF the conrt euiJinlng and re-
straining the Sheriff or his deputies from
levying any writ of attachment in any
suit heretofore brought or which may here
after be commenced against the Pacific
Bank or any other bank OF San francisco.
OF from entering the bank premises Tor the
purpose of making any levy or to sustain any
levy heretofore made and from interfering
with CT obstructing the possession or night
of the Bank Commissioners for entering
upon or into any bank premises in the city,
and that upon the final determination OF
the cause the injunction be made per-
petual.
In the proceedings Attorney General
Hart was the attorney of record for the
Commissioners, with w. ii. l.. Barnes as
advisory counsel.
AS soon as the mum elton was served on
the Sheriff he withdrew his deputy from
the bank, but not beyond a gOpd point of
observation. Meanwhile his attorney.
Matt Sullivan, sought Judge Dainge field
and procured very vital mod hcation OF
the order of the court, by which. in fact,
the Sheriff recovered all of his lost ground,
and under which he resumed control OF
the assets of the Pacific Bank. The modi-
4 fed order Of the court was as follows
Good cause herefor being shown, IL is
hereby ordered that ihe order OF Injunction this
day made IN The aboVe-entitled action be and
the sam Is b. reby modified, so that any at
tacnment that had been levied by the defendant
before The making Of said order of injunction
and The defendants possession Of any property
taken before The making OF said order
of Injunction under any writ OF attach
meut shall not be and are not ell
Joined or disturbed thereby pending hearing
OF order TO >hoW cause and TO the extent thai
SAID order of injunction fOrbids the said de-
any property takeD by him upou any writ OF
attachment before the making OF said order OF
Injunction or from entering The bank premises
OF the Pacific Bank FOR the purposes OF contluu-
ing such possession pending hearing OF order
to show cause the same IS hereby vacated and
set aside.
WILLIAM X. DAINGERFIELD, Judge.