The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1893-12-09
CASES IN COURT TODAY.
Several Notions Entertained In Tie
Common Pleas Division.
In The APPELLATE DIVISION
A large Dock~t CT Equity Cases Bssrd
and Disposed Of Cross We Brown.
sieese &,Ciark Given Anothes Hearing.
Docket for Monday.

Today's session of the compcu pleas
division was taken up with the usual
large number OF motions before Judge
Wilbur. The assigned cases for the day
were then taken up as foliows:
The case OF Albert ID. Bean VS. Joseph
Homer first claimed attention Mr..
Champlin appeared for the plaintiff and
Mr.. Cooke for the defendant This is a
suit for services rendered by Homer.
Daniel A. Wright ct ux VS.. Same.
John w. Hogan VS.. Joseph Hcaley.
Stephen Remington VS.. George s. Bull
lock.
Harvard X. Stokes VS. Providence News
company
Harvard x. Stokes VS.. George French.
Byron S. Cheney vs.. Transatlantic In.
surancc company.
The following were heard before Judge
Rogers: The morning was taken up by q
continuation of the case OF John A. Cross
VS.. Brown, Steese & Clark. The case, with
each hearing, seems to grow more compli-
Gated and it y rather doubtful whether
the lawyers themselves understand where
to begin in untangling the snarl. The
court gave long expositions on various
points of law and the lawyers raised moro
and Mr.. Tillinghast apparel for the par.
ties of the suit.
In tho Appellate Division.
The following cases were heard in the
appellate division today;
Thomas Halstead vss Samuel Smith.
Page & Owen for appellants; Robert w.
Burbank for appellees. Continued.
I nnul.. rAv-
tinued one week.
Robert Paterson VS.. st. Thomas Church.
Petition for decree. Received, Wood &
Fits for appellants. A. A. Mclaughlin
for appellees.
Franklin b. Hannvs. Providence Journal
Co. Page and Oweps' for appellants.
Richard Comstock for apleliees. Contin-
ued for one week.
Susan Gearin w. John ueariu. Motion
for allowance.
Harriet Vial vs.. William f.. Vial. Motion
to assign. Continued Que week.
Sarah A. M. Shedd vs.. Horace Shcdd.
Continued. -
Donnelly VS.. Simmons. WIZ. Vincent
for appellant. j. West for appellce. Pc
tition for the appointment ar a receiver.
Louis j Paine VS. Mrs. Paine. Suit for
divorce on the ground OF intidelity.
Docket for Monday.
fAppeliaio Division.1
1895. State vs.. Daniel Place. Attorney
for plaintiff. Albert ID. Bean; for defend
ant, Robert w. Burbank.
357. Long Island Brick Company vs..
Frank w. Arnold. Attorney for plain
ti1, Stephen p. Edwards; for defendant,
Little6eld & Stness.
2s74. j. Erastus Lester VS.. Citizens
Savings Bank, ct al. Attorneys for plain
tiff, Erastus Lester aud Samuel Ames; for
defendant, James NJ. Ripley.
Common Pleas pivisiop.1
66o7 Simon f.. Simmons ct ux. rs.
Town Treasurer OF Johnston. L. 8.
Hopkins for plaintiff; Wood q Fitch for
defendant.
I'LL. Thomas Wilson VS.. New York,
New Haven and Hartford Railroad COM
pany. Attorney George j. West for
plaintiff, w. B. Vincent for defendant.
N 6Sl3. James II. O'Neil VS.. Builders Iron
Foundry. Attorney for plaintiff, ID. r..
Sheehan; for defendant, James TilliDg-
hast.
20. Moses w. Horton ct ux. va. Corne-
liza G. Horton. Attoney for plaintiff James
Tillinghast; for defendant, James NJ. Rip
ley and A. Z. Brown.