The Portland daily press., 1893-08-02
THE CREAM SEPARATOR PAYS.
Information Interesting to Bo'h
cry Men and MILK Producers


Information Interesting to Bo'h
cry Men and Milk Producers
VIII some of your contributors enIg ieo,, i,lu
on the subject of milk separatorsf ~" n. =,
cows ought one to have to make ~ -,,oJ =
profitable? Is the butter better than ts1 ins'o :.
in the old fashioned way il proper o'Ao 40
taken?
We now have at our dairy school LOT
the use of students studying farm GARY
ing five kinds of hand separators, any
one Of which is good machine anu aoes
its work satisfactorily. We nave peeh
using one separator a couple OF years.
running it part of the time with a Jersey
bull on a two horse tread power. Inc
bull soon grew to like the work. IL we
may Judge from Ills actions. 1t was Ger
tainly relief from standing idle all tne
time. He was especially Delighted Win
the pail of warm skimmilk wnch enc
dairyman gave him to drink at the close
of the Swimming. Our DeLaval Bapy
Separator No. runs perfectly smooth
and even with tread power. IL runs
easily by hand and it is not considered
hard work to skim the milk OF l0 or 10
cows.
First of all, get pair of scales. One
of the better class of spring balances
costing 81 will do. Weigh the milk OF
each cow as often as once week, re-
cording the same, so as to calculate the
yield of a cow for a year. Next get a
Baboock milk test. A four bottle ma
chine is large enough and will cost about
So. Use the test first Of all to see how
closely you are removing the fat from
the milk by your present system. Ana
lyze the full milk as it goes into the pans
or cans and then the skimmlk after the
cream has been removed.
Mr.. Morrison has been using the Bah
cock test in our farmers institutes this
winter, testing the full milk, skimmllk
and buttermilk brought in by farmers to
the institutes. In a great many cases
the skimmilk showed per cent fat left
in the milk, while the full milk showed
about per cent fat-that is, these SO
called dairymen were losing % per cent
of all of the fat in their milk. These
farmers had raised the feed, fed it to the
COWS, MIXED them and carried the milk
to the house, where, because of improper
handling, 25 per cent Of the fat was lost.
What business but farming can stand
such waste?
AS is said above, use the Babcock test
and see how close you are recovering the
fat by your present system. If you are
losing over two-tenths of per cent f; i
in your skimmilk by the present system
and cannot improve upon it, you should
begin at once to seek some other system
of raising or separating cream. Win
the hand separators carefully run you
need not lose over one or two-tenths of /
per cent fat, the latter being the extreme
limit.
Last year farmer living near Fond
du Lac, Wis, followed just the plan
have laid down and soon discovered that
he was wasting great deal of fat. He
then took hand separator on trial and
in month returned, saying he was
ready to pay for it; that he was milking
IS cows and the hand separator was saw
ing two pounds of butter day over tbs
old system; that these two pounds Of
butter saved were; equal to having two
more COWS in his herd, and since he die
not have to feed, milk or care for these
two he was well satisfied to pay the price
of the separator.
How can farmer who is taking care
of cows for money and not for fun af
ford to go along blindly, not knowing
where he is losing the fat which has cost
SO much to make, when for $8 and lit
tie intelligent study he can learn jus1
where the wastes are and be in position
| to check themp
IF our inquirer will put the scales il
his barn, get the Babcock test and ther
the hand separator if he finds it neces
sary, as he probably will, I will guaran
tee that he would not take 800 at the
end of one year and go back to his ole
practice Of working in the dark, as he il
| now doing.-Professor Henry in Breed
| er's Gazette.