The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1893-12-02
RELATIONS OF oOnss :
'sTHn EST cssr sr,n,,,
nlsn svrsfnn ass s''s' \
The Ann Arbor SIM.
nrsssed--A Deed o. N. ,iss'H "a "a
tor o. +. morton s. ,''', ~.
About Gordon. ra,,,,

Washington. Eoyember =
which derived rs Interest AZ, ~
from the Rotation Of rs6s,,, = Z. y ran
courts was decided ia the 4n,... NV ~
The historical statement 81 !. \ Y q, '''''
made by Chief Justice F,.iler 4, = ~
ing the judgment Of the co,rt !. = $500 ~.
Frederick Gardner. a cl,i,Ss \. I: N
sued the Michigan eentras III, L ., y. ''''A'l
pany IN the courts Of ns5,I.a. ....
Mich, TO recover Tor da,n,ra>' ~. s.''''
W reason OF The railroad cshb,n,. !. (
ligence in causing ana sI.s,,rs !. ~
main hole ia tic p,aut.nty /. !. y y
| cressiiiE near is station hao>. Z t;.''l4}
Mich Gardner received 4 Y Nlrl|
when. Oh appeal 10 the slinssa,,' ~ !,
| the state. was reversed. MA s tpYli 4
was ordered elaintim thna 4 ,.1 1sn "a
suit ia the state c0urts an3 80 ~: Y
action IN the United sthtes ~ r,,5s,.
n estern district cf Michigan. III. W Y. *
lnuse .nouk1t tntre was no aeti.l.sse.''
instruction to that eject wtS ',ie.e
Jury BY tic district Judge On NJ y ~ "
trial, and q verdict aEalnsf *. !. 4. 4
ton. ~ ''4t 9''',.
From that Judgment aprs., J.
10 the United States stlpre;ne rkae = < "
sci Tor plaintiff Insisted shht AZ. s ,ass q. +
OF thc supreme court Or Miclll.s6' NJ
a new action against No az. l " y.
evidence tendlng to prove onif N. i,
state Of facts Which ths eriisssss Y, 81
the supreme court Of thA 49,. NJ, ~.
20 nrove. The chief jusilca 5siS Y
hiA associates could not concur "A ~ " !.
ana were " opinion that tie e,fs1. y
was not Obliged TO give any sies $ +
70 the proceedings Of the Ssa,a cda,,
As 10 the action Of tao clrrai. III. l.
directing the Jury Is rSturn 1 rsi XIV. (.
the railroad company on the sfs,si X
there was no negligence On III r.s, n.
chief Justice said the cass shnt,s
been left to the Jury 10 asiar,,l,.
question Of negligence. The ,odrhs..
the circuit court IVES thefefor1 -.
and a new trial ordered '''f
NOT pAT1NTABbg.
This patent grnnted In 1851 Il On
Gordon for 4an improved appat.t,,
cooling and drawing beer wa nst !
founded. according to decision 3. d, n
prenle court rendered by justice lslr
patent and as such he brought snIl 4, T.
lehn J Kaile and John il. IeAnis
Infringement
The cases were Heard BY The la,A i'll y
Blatchforyl, sitting IN the Nofihein t,i
of New York. and decided asalfsl n.
on the ground that the deFice nsl..:1
Ind been anticipated by an appatlilI E
practical Use BY one Meinhaia 10 Hsi L
ter In 1917 or 1878 The supreme olsrl
iiraied the Judgment,
MoRToSs DEED suSrAlNEh
A controversy over the posesssa
tract of land near Oinaia, Nsbl, va
tied In the supreme court yesterday /: ~
yCr Of the grantee In q deed nom u. n
Senator Oliver II. Morton Of Indlals u
ton and one Allen Root CLAIMED tn a
Judicial sales against Roswell q rs y
Morton's claim 70 the property VI 81
tanned In the district court for NssillR
and II deed Ia the property extf1A
him by a master appointed f1t ihii
pose. Morton transferred his inlt'A
james Il. AVoulworth. who sfltrHz'.
compelled to sue Root for possess;A
Circuit court for Nebraska slisiabiei VI
worth and Root appealed to lie ssg1
court. The latter, in an opinion ~.
by Jdstice Jackson affirmed tie ii.-
of the circuit court
STRIKE CASE DISMISSED
The supreme court In an opinion Il
by Chief Justice Fuller dismissed II
peal q JAMES Lennon from The W.:
OF the circuit court Of the Unlied 81
for the Northern district q CHA
This was a case growing oui q q
nous strike last spring on the Ip't4l
Ann Arbor railroad. The Lats =
Railroad company procured an 07ia
the district court prohibiting It's fns
from refusing 10 handle freight On
signed TO Its road from the AM
road. Lennon WAS a lake ah1fe sa7 n
md refused to haul his tfplh 1h1c II
some Ann Arbpr cara MlX
arnested on i charge Of contempt n Y n
and Judge Kicks fined him w. ~
toned the circuit court Tor hs IA
lpun a writ OF haheas corpus VIC IA
1eniHd. and he thereupon appe<loi = III
supreme court OF the United sibl4 r.
Chief Justice Fuller said The az n
cot come within the PROVISION 81 %. n
lectipn OF the 'l.rcuit court * spfs,e
lf March 3, 1891, the classes thsftA
fidad for being alone those p MAJ III
)ealS from huboas corpus dfclslqA " n
NJ constitutional or iltrlseifliol1l g n
Ions for the review Of The saplsgs n
II the United States wers lnsqlit' =
Justice Fuller said, and urdar
ueut 81 the court Ia the chse q t&t2 u
he Houston and TEXTS een,fzl iilIH
announced two weeks ago. iif -
you'd be dismissed.