The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1893-12-10

70 Isg3stEe the motives of a prosecutor
can not be inquired into upon the uial
tt.s5 ~ tIIs rcgpoudrnt In making said
"E.ft,c4 cam not now be inquired into, UNI
los Che respondent be charged with WIZ
1,lIv and Knowingly making false chnrser
-, cold Ttvf.hsson which nowhere
",,,,-'srs to bo al!esel on charged
II Uec1ige this respondent is entitled
az mai la. llus COURSE. OF law ON an Issues
~" :. =, l." ai,s i1lf anit anal noihlu- can be
,,i r,, .a G9fabllshpd AGAINST him until the
$50 a.. .i'sc.fIsiIIy aYp.et aud proven
La due proccss III law. therefore this re-
Pc, III NJ ,ss,, mot lts called upon to answer
nnDIsad mass OF legal conclusions, lu-
farntgcs ana so-callcd "Hnd.ngS" of The
gu AL y,birh t,rn 40 Jutcrtlt,llly
,I,tci maj this rs,rpndent does not know
~ ,tt1t Fac !, ACCUSED. aud can only spec
uiprs 40 what he iF expected TO answer
IL I'd Huse thls respondents right to
practice law is Is valuable franchise when
can only bc taken away by due course or
law fouudcG upon proper charge, Tor
assume the resu5nsiblity Imposed by law.
Ia this prOccedluS Judge Alex ie4rmau q
not the prosecutor, hecuuac he distinctly
'sIgBcsts" that the district attorney ta,e
the proCt cdiugs as any lawyer might un
undor the statute under oath; while inc
di trlct attorney makes no charges 4gHiutl
IN respondent bat a lcgeS pIHctcd.lt N"
this respondent mas already been tried and
found guilty and cites lhis rts8on li ,sS 70
aypC'I " VIA In} Inc rrnlored against MIN.
ILL., And, further excepting. this respond.
cnt says that che issues before the court
when said alleged hndmBS We're mac
against him involved only the quit or IN
nuccncc OF j. &. huteneSon VINO alone
was on trial ana the findings OF the court
outside OF the issues jolnea between saiu
Hutchinson and the government II hnoluga
they were. We're wholly without authority
Of law, non Corhm Judic"' ana Nold, sHu
can not form the hHAs on which to erect
these charges aEalnH. WIS reSNM'rh'
II. Ecclus" tho charges suggested ny
the court to be brought by the district at
torucy against this respondent a;e not
based in the statutory sense on the On
ecrvation OF the court; on the contrary
whether this respondent Is culrhble Or
not depends on issues of tact That ceuia
@oiilj not he determined by the court for
the want of issues depending before the
IL Rpcnusa this proceeding does not
come within the letter. spirit meaning
purpose or object OF the statutes referred
in and is therefore without statutory au-
E,rtt ma voin
rs, ,o,an Of tho foregoing grounds OF
~ ~, tt,t9 r.epondent saws TINT the
fi r,,otton of INC district attorney and
Ti'' ~ "r1S. tbarein referred are in
NC Ii ',t a. low, =, raotire this respond-
sut Itcl'lio ~ '"% r,1 -, charge This rcspond-
~ Va ~ mis- mis- respondent prays the
Gui, anI ., ~, rgurt
JuNs'''t'' Viihort ~ i51trick Respondent
N''1' >.,,yttti,
In answer to said motion fled herein
a.. e'i1 1ts,rict attorney and said order
therein
lerred TO- TINS respcmug aa Very ,verv indndn
IiIN, ga IN y,,,rr"TiaI limiting" of the
alsh'u alu p ~, iv, recifnI and conclu-
court auH a h ~ sn,, ,nstr,inents con
sivh IN t'gn VI, 1HHy 90 or may sock
lAIhe,'' so "a as ,,,, - AR "a mn
To ch.I5g ms i.nif mon hin, in nny
Hb"is- 9t 90 i,, No ,t,,,,fassionni char
manner WIatlNt' III - ~ ~, bindinf-
Hclei or a man. W. ~ t t,,I ,"InTv nn2
erect upon mn a. ~ ,,';;,,,, ma have
uhcqulEp' ny u.s. Mn I'm INSTANCE, in
no iouhlH'l"u III H"'"' q" "
ldrt or III INV. .,i,,ttg tl,,t b,- re, =
ms lt5PG, ,i,i,,,nt ths sajd charges
son OF stlu Juubl'Cit t'1 @ -
made by this resPon9ig,nii aSal'1 6nt oniv
Hutchinson are res tuJ t, tn, MEAD.
SO lar a. the i5Sus n.y. ~ - - in ii,esnn
inss. tu-"il; me IlEut VI h,,'N - fIiffbnr,
u practice law ~ thls GoTl - - d,'s moi
than that sHlh otlei OF JuuGi''"' "O'' ''
affect this respondent ,.,.t ,ho,.,,..s
rms respouIt-ie tet'e5 tht' s SW Irat ii7, ~
agalus, HutoAesgH reeve, IN I'm. MINI
hy the court, or that the court lui!E nT''' "a
aul considered the evidence ouSl Su "H
the trial OF sald chaIh5S 1Nl Is - Ian
proceedings As ieyllt" III So l 49,,
ana sAa juIsmeut. hul on tlc tu",,"'
TINS respondent expressly 'lese5 tl"' az
tne time sad cAnHe va Sei i.m Hoft' vas
expressly asreed IN open court tn by g an p ,Hi