Aberdeen herald. [volume] (Aberdeen, Chehalis County, W.T.) 1886-1917, 1893-08-24
Aug. Is, 1898.


Assn. of Ocosta. Foreclosure of lien.
Aug. 49, 1898.
The court made an order that causes
will be set for trial on each motion day,
and that notice be given as herewith re-
quired. Three days notice shall be given
TO the adverse party of the hearing Of any
motion upon motion day, and no motion
will be heard unless such notice be
given, except defaults where there is no
appearance and ex-party motions. Pro-
vided the provisions OF this rule may be
waived by consent of all parties in inter
est.
Markham VS. Rutherford ct AL Judg-
ment granted against j III Rutherford
and Mary M Eberling.
Aberdeen Bank VS. Barker. Demurrer
over-ruled and default and judgment
granted.
Bank OF Montesano VS. South Arbor Co.
Confirmation of sale granted.
Treen vs. q ii Com Co. Motion to
strike answer oyer-ruled.
M l. q Co VS. Sears ct al. Demurrer
as to all defendants dismissed, except as
to Sears, and as TO hin default and judg-
ment granted.
Aberdeen Bank VS. w Maxwell.
Default and judgment granted.
Town of Ocosta VS. Geo r. Filley.
Dismissed.
Vining vs. Mailing. Confirmation of
sale.
First Natl Bank VS. A Imp Co De-
fault and judgment granted.
Smith VIC NJ q, 10 Mot;o,, 70 ,,,o1,,
more definite and certain over-ruled.
In the matter of estate of G f Mack,
A J Kroenert appointed administrator,
with bond fixed at $4,000.
Helm VS. Hamer : Motion to quash
summons over-ruled.
Bank of Motesano VS. South Arbor Co.
Confirmation of gale granted.
Cochran VS. Honey ct al-Statement of
facts settled and signed.
Chehalis county VS. Gilbreath-Order
signed vacating judgment.
First National Bank of Aberdeen vs.
Andrews-Order of confirmation signed.
City of Aberdeen VS. Pearson-Motion
for Judgment over-ruled.
Schatz VS. Sells-Defendant S motion for
judgment over-ruled and cause set for
trial November l, 1898.
Osborne vs. w. Fl. Blair-Plaintiff's
motion to dismiss as to Mrs. w. II. Blair
sustained.
Wooding VS. Crain--Motion for default
for failure to reply over-ruled and five
days given to reply
H. j. Lyons VS. Olaf Hanson-Motion
for bill of particulars over-ruled.
Cochran VS. Benn = Motion to make
more definite was taken under advise
ment.
In the matter OF receiver of Aberdeen
Cedar Mig. Co., the court granted one
general order covering all cases, allowing
the receiver to appear and defend in
causes enumerated in order.
In the matter of naturalization of Jerry
ID. Gagner, admitted.
Aberdeen Bank We Schneider = De-
murrer to complaint over-ruled.
McGerry VS. South Aberdeen Improve
ment Co.-Motion to make more definite
and certain over-ruled.
Bennett VS. Minott-Default and judg-
ment granted.
Book VS. West ct al-Default granted.
August 49,
Hamilton VS. Taylor-Demurrer to COM
plant; argument heard, cause taken
under advisement.
Court announced that Friday, Sept
l, would be the next motion day.
Anderson VS. Binns-Sale confirmed.
Dickey VS. rehabilitation to dismiss
as to Anderson and Coombes heard and
sustained
N. w. Lumber Co. VS. Hamilton-De-
fault and judgment granted and ordered
entered.
Soule VS. Hayes-Default and judgment
granted and ordered entered.
Bergren VS. Montesano Lumber Co..
Statement of facts settled and certificate
signed by the Judge.
Riggs VS., Aberdeen Cedar Mfg Co-Ap-
plication for an order requiring sheriff to
turn books, etc., over to receiver of Aber-
deem Cedar Mfg. Co., denied on the
ground that proper showing had not been
made.
Thurston county's assessment just COM
pleted, is not as high as for several previ-
GUS years. The list develops the fact
fbot fhara ora GO fovpovorc -, Tho oo,u+x,