New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1893-01-19
CATHOLICS SEEK PEACE.
THEY SAY FACTION WAR Is OVER.
ARCHDrsHoPS CoRRlGAN AND IRELAND AND
THEIR FRIENDs-FURTHER DEXIALS.

i"'iis fhiisNDFf D''f>iNi's
The trouble in tho Roman Catholic Church In ,hl,
country Low promise, 10 abat". Everything ut
pres quiet - could BE- expected after the
warm campaign which has until recently been car
Ticd on by the hlends ard admirers Of both Arch
bishop IrrlIrd hand and those OF ArchLi ,hop
Coirigan on III" other Probably the nov powers con
ferrcd upon Monsenor st Ill., and the removal OF I'll
Coub 10 his staying here. have had much to do with
Che sudden cessation If hostility both idr.. II Is
III longer Of To insist that all tile trouble WIS
caused by the opposition Of Archbishop Corrgan to the
mission OF MonSignor -atoili The trouble was caused
beyond doubt. by the Jealous friend. OF both Arch
bishop Ireland and Archbishop Corrignn attacking
each other and saying hard things about the Arch
lishop OF 81. Paul The side and the Archbishop
Of New York the other II Is well known that these
two ArchbshopS have not been In sympathy for some
iim'. but that hcy iB,tigatcd at ack, np.n each other
no one could easily prove. There agc few people
In New-Norl City at least. who believe that Arch
bishop Corrigan did anything to njurc Archbishop
Ireland In any way. and there are fewer still who
believe he took the slightest action 10 oppoS" the
mission Of Mcnsignor -nolli. The tlng, Catho-
lies assert undoubtedly may be said IN regard TO the
assertion that Archbishop Trcl?nd inSgatcd the AT
lacks Archbishop Conlgan. Every knows
that he was never opposed To M0nsignor Satol and.
In fact, that H. did much to have him sent here.
II Is also safe 10 say, they declare that the Arch
bishop Of II. Paul has not preferred charges against
The Archbishop of New York, ANA that Mon-gnor
SatOl undoubtedly knows by this time that Arch
bishop CorrigLn. well ~ Archbishop Iceland Ia
his friend Archbishop CoTigin. they further declare,
VIII not be censured by the Pope; he viii not be
asked TO resign; ne Will hot BE- made cardinal and
then called to Rome TO stay there. not to be
In charge OF the Archdiocese oI New-IOrk, and no
coadjutor bishop will be appointed 10 help him man
age the affairs Of this dlOresc. because II Is not be
lleved that he has done ANYTHING 10 warrant such
action on the part OF the Pope. Everything. II Is
confidently asserted. Will remain It before the
dispute. All concerned sorry that there has been
80 mitch talk, and every one has, during the last
few days. done his best 10 end the diScuSSon 80 that
1t has now practically entirely ceased
IL Is said that n recent decree Of tine Propaganda
has fixed the Phpa Delegates annual salary at
10000 lire.
1t is now certain that Monslgnor satoi will not
attend the celebration al 81. Agne>'s Church In this
city next sunday. Dr. Brann, the rector Of that
church, received letter from Dr. OGornlan, Of the
Catholic University ut Washington. regarding ia" fol
lowing Interview with him published on saturday
e Neither Monsignor Satoi nor Bishop k"anc nor nv
self ever expressed any Intention Of attending this
celebration. We never formally accepted any invita-
ton that might have been given by letter. said
verbally that We would co. Bishop k'anc some
times goes 10 New York oh business connected with
the Catholic University, but there i no signicanc"
in the fact that he any els" lIom here does
not go. Ncith'r MonslgnOr >atO. Bishop Kcanc. nor
Of the Catholic University faculty., irGended o ~
to New York for the celebration al +. Agnes Church
n January -. We not going, and We never
Intended TO GO
In his letter 10 DR.. Branu. Or. OGornan SAYS
Il was aware that MOnsIgnOr -atolli had promised
10 De with you for the cclclIstion Of II Agncs. feast
| was also aware That a few days altciward l' had
written you 10 say that De could not keep the 81
gag-n-nf. THEREFOR ! could not, without grave
inilaction of the truth. that he had never In
tended To 20. nor did say ~.
DR.. OIOrnan also Ia hi, letter thai n"il" Ia"
nor IHslop Kcane ever said what they az credited
with SAYING in the published story. and add that he
/, at a los, know WHY the alleged interview -houd
lave been publ he'd. Dr. l'rann l. delighted with
Dr. OGormans letter. ana Is glad h mad" an en-
phatic denial.