The morning news. [volume] (Savannah, Ga.) 1887-1900, 1893-11-07
MANY JUDGMENTS TAKEN.
The November Term Of the City Court
Begins Business.

| A Number of Suits on Accounts and
Notes Disposed of by Judgments By
Default-A Big Docket and Plenty Of
Business for the Term-Criminal
/ Cases for Jury Trial When Solicitor
! General Returns.
! The city court assembled for the No
vember term yesterday morning. The
/ greater part of the session was consumed
in assigning the docket. The docket has
not been fully arranged yet, and it will
! perhaps be some time before the order to
be followed is outlined
The jury has been called for this morn
ing, but no cases have been assigned for
trial, and there will ne very little for the
jurors to DO. The court has good deal
20 do this term, however, and it will not
be long before it gets down to business.
After the solicitor has finished his
work on the circuit the trial of criminal
cases in this court where indictments and
jury trial have been demanded will be-
gin, and Saturdays will be devoted to
them. There are great many cases on
this docket, in which the parties are out
on bond and the solicitor general will have
his hands full with them for sometime after
he returns. the hearing of the motion
for new trial in the case of Frank Gaff-
ney, TYbee's ex-chief of police, for ours
ing and abusing Mayor McDonough, has
been set for hearing next Saturday
Gaflney, ii will be remembered was
sentenced TO six months Imprisonment
without the alternative of paying fine.
The court did away with a part of the
work before it yesterday, and disposed of
good many Of the suits on accounts,
notes and the like, where judgments by
default were taken against the parties
sued. Judgments by default were taken
in the following cases
Hull 4 LathrOp VS. William Falconer
on personal notes aggregating $500,
S92 ~ interest and $3.50 attorneys fees.
Harms & Juchter VS.. II. +. Luderman
on account, 1864 60, with interest.
Phillips & Sons VS.. John Williamson,
on.a note, $500, with interest.
Decker Il Fawcett VS.. Robert Remler,
on account, S205 70 and interest.
John r. Dillon, receiver M LAWNS es-
tate, VS.. James M. Griffith, account, S136,
vs.. A. B. Howard, account, $l45, and VS..
John j. Somers, account, S64 20, with in
terest
Nelson, Morris & Co. VS.. E. N. Hester,
account, $40 ~, with interest.
Hurbert Bros. VS.. NJ. Boley 81 Son, ac-
count, S27l 90 with interest.
+ ACulAldh IAClltE N 70. VS.. JOnu HfGS-
nan, three notes of $l70 so each, with in
terest.
c. D. Rogers VS.. II. f. Luderman,
S26S u on account, with interest.
Shoemaker, Pickering Il Co, VS. Moritz
Stenberg, on accounts, Sl,067, with in
terest.
julius Librowicz VS.. j. g. Toschach, on
note, Sl42 so and interest.
Western National Bank of Baltimore
vs. Joseph Fried, note, $780, with interest.
Southeastern Plaster Company VS.. M.
E. Reddick, note, $279 33, with interest.
Nelson Morris K Co. VS.. Thomas w
Fleming, account $434 90, with interest.
Executions were ordered issued in all
these cases, and levies will be made, where
there is property to levy upon, to satisfy the
judgments A number of other cases of
this kind will probably be disposed of in
the same way to-day, and at other times
during the term.
Return day in the superior court is Just
one week from to-day. So far there is
rather light docket in this court, as far
as new business is concerned. 1t is prob
able, however, that Judge Fa lligant will
find plenty to do when he reaches the
civil docket in his court.