The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1893-10-26

Kate Keough VI. Mrs. y. c. Dow.
sett ct al; assumpsit. Magoon foi
plaintiff; G. Brown for defendants.
i. .. Hall 81 Son vs.. Liliuokalan
Dominis; assumpsit. Magoon foI
plaintiffs.
James Harvest vs.. c. II. Luther et
| all ejectmeHt. POepOe for plaintiff
c. Brown for defendants.
FOREIGN JURY-cIvIL.
Catherine Bachelor vs.. G. b. vii
/ son, marshal; trespass. Ashford for
| plaintiff; Hatch Carter for defendant.
| II. Wilgeroth vs.. Eva Plantation
| Co; damage. Ashford for plaintiff;
| Castle for defendant.
In re bankruptcy of 7. Ahung;
bankrupt's appeal from order of Judge
Whiting, committing him 10 prison.
Tung Yuk VS.. Ngao LUX; case.
Hartwell for plaintiff; Neumann-
Creighton for defendant.
Thos. Mott vs.. c. 7. Gulick, guard
ian; assumpsit. c. w. Ashford for
plaintiff; Kinney for defendant.
f. c. Crick VS.. Z. G. Hitchcock,
marshal; damage. Peterson Creigh-
ton for plaintiff; Attoruey-G
for defendant
G.. a. 2. Gardiner VS.. E. G. Hitch
cock, marshal; damage. Peterson
Creighton for plaintiff; Attorney
General for defendant.
f. Schiefer VS.. Olowalu Sugar Co.;
case. Rosa for plaintiff; Hatch for
defendant.
Ing Choi vs.. All Pong ct al; as
sumpsit. Castle for plaintiff.
John Mott VS.. G.. w. Lincoln ct al;
assumpsit. Magoon for plaintiff;
Hatch Kinney for defendants.
Al. TT
stone: assumpsit. Appeal from dis
person.; MagOon for acknowledgement
liant.
c. a. Brown VS.. Bulletin Publish
ing Company; trespass on case. Hatch
for plaintiff; G. w. Ashford for de-
PENDANT.
Jacob Lyons VS.. ]. Hubash and G.
Bachelor; assumpsit. Carter & Car
ter for plaintiff; G. w. Ashford for
defendant Bachelor.
Wong Wa Foy VS.. Wong Tai PoOn
ct al; assumpsit. Magoon for plain
tiff.
Honolulu Planning Mill VS.. P. Muh-
lendorf ct al; assumpsit. Magoon for
plaintiff; Hatch-Kinney for defend
ants.
Louisa Rodriguez VS.. Domingos
Lopez; covenant. Carter & Carter for
plaintiff; c. w. Ashford for defend
ant.
Hoomana Kaoao VS.. VIM. Norton;
replevin. Appeal from district court
of Honolulu. Wakefield for plaintiff
Carter & Carter for defend
ant.
All Loi ct al. VS.. Kui; damage.
Johnson for plaIntiffS-appellant Ma
COON for defendant.
peal from district court of Honolulu.
Kaulia for PLAINTIFF; Achi for defend
DIVORCE AND SEPARATION.
Alice Davies VS.. William Davies.
Kinney fc- plaintiff; V. V. Ashford
for defendant.
James Sutherland vs.. Mary Suther-
land. Kinney for plaintiff.
Kauimakaole Lazarus VS.. JOS. Laz-
arus. Kinney for plaintiff; G. w.
for defendant.
Kuhinu (w) VS.. Kalepe. Rosa for |
&. Brown for defendant.
Lilly Mahi VS.. Maka Mahi. G.. w. |
Ashford for plaintiff; Kinney for de-
endant
Miriam p. McKeague VS.. Daniel |
Poepoe for PLAINTIFF; Kau-
Ia for defendant.
Lakana Pikai (k) VS.. Ponolua. c.
Brown for plaintiff.
Mooheau Keliiinulama (w) VS.. Ke-
iiinulama Kaona. Kaulia for plain
,iff; Creighton for defendant.
Kaisan (k) vs.. Koshino. Neumann
or plaintiff.
Nawahine (w) VS.. Kauhaa. Magoon
or plaintiff.
Lizzie Lokana VS.. David Lokana
Davidson for nIaiDtjff
Nui (w) VS.. Keoni Ahipaka. Kin
ley for plaintiff.
Sarah Eliz. Gertz VS.. F. Gertz. Kin
ley for plaintiff.
Kanamu wv VS.. Kekiokalani. John
on for plaintiff; G. Brown for defend
mt.
Phoebe Harrison VS.. J. II. Harrison.
:. w. Ashford for PLAINTIFF; G. Brown
Or defendant.