The Hawaiian gazette. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1865-1918, 1893-02-07

Inc queen VS.. An Sam, maintain
ing lottery scheme; appeal from Ho
nolulu District Court. Peterson 70
defendant.
The Queen VS.. All Hook, maintain
ing lottery scheme; appeal from Ho
nolulu District Court. Kaneakua TO
defendant.
The Queen VS.. All Fook, maintain
ing lottery scheme; appeal from Ho
nOlulu District Court. Ashford TO
defendant
The Queen VS.. John Malay, un
lawful possession of opium; appea
from Honolulu District Court. Ia
ulukou for defendant.
Provisional Government, Hawaiian
Islands, VS.. All Fook and All You
conspiracy ID degree. Creighton fo
defendants.
Provisional Government, II. l., VS.
All Wo, assault with intent to com
NIT rape.
Provisional Government, H. l., VS..
Young Hoy, gross cheat. Castle fol
defendant.
Provisional Government H. L. VS.
Young Wal, gross cheat. Castle for
defendant.
Provisional Government H. 1. VS..
Z. E. Carey, libel first degree. Hart
well for defendant.
Provisional Government II. /. VS..
J. w. Gibbs, assault with dangerous
weapon. Peterson for defendant.
Provisional Government II. 1. VS..
Loo Pu alias Loo POu, attempt to
commit an offense. Kaneakua for
defendant.
Provisional Government H. I. VS..
Peter Quinn, manning.
Hop Hing & Co. VS.. Wilder Steam
ship Co., damage; appeal from Homo
lulu District Court. Hartwell for
plaintiff; Hatch for defendant.
Awana VS.. Wilder Steamship Co.,
damage; appeal from Honolulu Dis
trict Court. Hartwell for plaintiff;
Hatch for defendant.
NJ. r. Freitas, guardian, VS.. John F.
Hackfeld, damage. Neumann for
plaintiff; Hatch for defendant.
]. F. Calasopa VS.. NJ. Perreira alias
Perry, case. Ashford for plaintiff;
Davidson for defendant.
Carl Henoch VS.. Hawaiian Govern
ment, assumpsit. Hatch for plaintiff;
Acknowledgement for defendant.
L. AhlO VS.. Tai Lung, assumpsit.
Ashford for plaintiff; Hatch for de-
PENDANT.
S. Ahmi VS.. Waihee Sugar Co.,
trover. Ashford for plaintiff; Peter
son for defendant.
Ministero of Interior VS.. j. D. Spreck-
els ct al, ejectment. Carter for plain
tiff; Hatch for defendants.
Catherine Bachelor VS.. c. B. Will
son, Marshal, trespass. Ashford for |
plaintiff; Hatch Carter for defendant. |
]. S. Walker VS.. A. P. Peterson ct |
al, assumpsit. Brown for plaintiff;
Peterson for defendants.
E. E. Carey VS.. G. E. Harrison,
trespass. Hartwell for plaintiff; |
Creighton for defendant.
Wing WO Chan & Co. VS.. Wilder |
Co., action on the case.
Hartwell for plaintiff; Hatch for de-
.endant.
Wing Wo Tai & Co. VS.. Wilder
Co., action ON the case.
Hartwel for plaintiff; Hatch for de-
endant.
E. o. Hall & Son VS.. Wilder Steam
ship Co., action on the case. Hart
we'll for plaintiff; Hatch for defend
mt.
NJ. A. Gonsalves & Co. VS.. Wilder
Co., action on case. Hart
veil for plaintiff; Hatch for defend
mt.
H. E. Pieper VS.. Wilder Steamship
Co., damage; appeal from Honolulu
District Court. Hartwell for plaintiff;
Hatch for defendant-appellant.
b. j. Ignacio VS.. E. Wolters, dam
Ige; appeal from Honolulu District
COURT. Correa for plaintiff-appellant;
lagoon for defendant.
Kwong Hip Lung Co. VS.. Wilder
steamship Co., damage; appeal from
honolulu District Court. Hartwell
or plaintiff; Hatch for defendant
ppellant.
Frank Brown VS.. Wilder Steamship
o., damage; appeal from Honolulu
District Court. Hartwell for plain
iff; Hatch for neutrality-suspicious..
A. w. Van Valkenberg VS.. Wilder
steamship Co., damage; appeal from
honolulu District Court. Hartwell
Or plaintiff; Hatch for defendant
ppellant.
B. j. Ignacio VS.. E. Wolters, trover;
ppeal from Honolulu District Court.
orrea for plaintif-appellant; Ma
Don for defendant.
Jas. A. Low VS.. J. NJ. Horner, as {
lmpsit. Neumann for plaintiff;
-shford for defendant.
Katherine Rencken VS.. f. Lutzo-
'icko, assumpsit; appeal from Homo
llu District Court. Creighton for
laintiff; Rosa for acknowledgement
mt.
Schmidt & Sons VS.. John Young,
appeal from Bickerton, J.,
Chambers. Magoon for plaintiff
Dpellant; Ashford for defendant. t
Henry Willgeroth VS.. Eva Planta- =
on Co., damage. Ashford for plain
IF; Castle for defendant. !
You Chong VS.. Wilder Steamship I
o., damage; appeal from Honolulu i
istrict Court. Hartwell for plaintiff; \
atch for defendant-appellant.
Ermina de Silva VS.. Joao Antonio
unes, breach of promise of marriage. S
for plaintiff. t
A. da c. Daniel VS.. Lusitana Benefit 4
'ciety, assumpsit. Neumann for
aintiff. ?
P. Peck vs.. Look Tong, assumpsit. r
for plaintiff. q
CAUSES FROM OTHER CIRCUITS.