Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1893-05-04
CRIMINAL APPEALS.



ApstiH, Tex April -lSlrcial =.
The cour, Of crimiunl appeals decided
The following yasrs yesterday
cq9,lie..lg9n ior ihrti .a.irpc1an' m. .rs
'pn l.... ~ lor 80 "a, nl.u -
sfU r''N W. ~ iV,l.n -" W" III ~ Y,
nlh- ~" contention y iiill Wy ont -
snytiling' vas swlndling. M, ,, 10
IN li'it, NJ, az neiln's n'S,
sue unsIsh'c p'tN'eh 5le W. .nni
| ~ w III " "Nh'I w. NJ h 49,,
',ar w nl'r,ii.-iN W ~ ',.si'i,
| =. ~ ILL.,, W., ,, ~ " lsii tii
| = W.T.. W H'i"WH p,,I>Yu !" holu "
] ,lp"' "sfs ..' INV y ~ ~ ,'is -,
~, ,,,h hn W w w ,,''l,, w
- hain,, san,t, us T., sn d XXX M
49,, =. . y. :" o
,N ..,,d y, NV pihnfs ~ nl'; ~ ,,
i,.,.,,'., H.. ~" ~ 1sr ,i'g,. :" IL IL
ver.cI XXI r,,,,,,yydc1 Si,nnIinns
'''''' az" ''"'nhu'N' """PA"'S' -
~ N N.tst,,.., s,a,a t.,,, o..
~. ~, I'm, ~ io.at,, iivsi i,',.
an amer 'rbe inf',-,na, an s,,,ps ,a,a1
1he agi',a- 80 ILL., "s ~ srros,;,g va
,,I,hom, n"nf l n'su ,,i,iua w
No., NIX. -. ~. ~, .i',,ff.aJ
T., ,iis a., " nt III i
~ s,a,.J h. ~, Il, ,,,.,,,','i'',, n NJ
i.,,,,,,ie,' u, ',,ui ''e,''" - ",y ~
H. M ,hssns,, ~ ,ii MI aiia,.,tio,, Il
,So,,ij h', ,,r's,,,ai e., ~, $3.50 80
cas,. Il reysrscd ,na r.,n,,'i,,d Slim.
Lin. 4 ' 70 'f
"
~; Mealrr Vs. tie stare from l'pl,
-. '"un'uuii Tor murder IN me ~cOhh
n'gI"e' the ueceasel anu one Sprousr
W. snEaseu IN Iin'Vlly ~ Snlun
.uv", psoA OF thc snlooh' Wnfh hppt'lnnt
'he baFk'tper lhcfell; walked bhck ana
shot deceased me defense y thnt me
.ln,'ASeh uhu y kniir an was hb9ut 10
Alh gr 'nJute SPROUTS, ne rpurt w hp'
IL did ,harEc murder m both degnes,
I'M lustinip'e honilvlue, uefr was no
sNlueh'r oI mhhsllngnltf' me Statt
proved murder upon express notice, The
he',l.t Mas lrhlent. inern WIS no cIIoI
~ ~, lviuslhR 70 "l"W nPprl'"h' !" p"'c
tnrpnN asn,hst nlilsell ca 'ne phlt W
uJrtseu aIl"''"nl wa ~, H. n'"Err
',,,,,. ill.,, va ,,,,n,, H.,
m "ni,i. I H. , nissu, ,rii h,S
h,., ,ue '. ai,,' a. Si,,,,'
p pin 'Ief" Is no error A'nr'ned' S'np'
-. ,,u a. So. r. 49,.
80" 1880, W ~ 'Is,' -" III
nuoii,', "' , 10, W. i,n,.,, w.
t.i',t -, ,Oh ',,'i,,nh ISM hui'
sliI, " SUI ~ IL w " ,' Ia, i,g
M" Iacls Who ,.,i n rro,n nnnelltnf
discovered the animal In kokcrnot's pen.
On the night succeeding the day OF this
discovery appellant went into the pen,
Killed the ycarling and threw It into Il
well, 1t WIS for this latter onensr lhat
lir was convicted. His contention l. that
theft aud not dvfrtld the owner. There
can he no question lhnl ihc act
done was for appellants hrhrlt, though
II WAS taken with intention To destroy II.
e Bishop criminal law, Sl''SlG Ia Tex,
800 Affirmed, Siupkins, y.
Emns0n W, state, from bonznles' Con
yiction for iraudulcntly altering u check,
The law points werc settled IN Emnson
vs.. STATE, - \ W. Rep, Jtti The CON
trntion Is that under the evidence the
and not merely altrr,Sl While it would
have been better to have added Il count
for forgery, II can not he said that the
evidence dues not support the verdict.
The Judgment Ia affirmed. Simpkin,
j.
H. Miller v. State. FROM Victoria.
Conviction Tor curryiug a pistol. II il
no defense to this charge 10 show that
whru he drew lie pistol. he was jisti.
lied In so doing The Judgment is alirm-