The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1893-12-03
AROUND THE COURTS.
APPEARANCE DOCKET or THE
CIVIL DISTRICT couRr.
only Sunday Intervening Between
Two ycrms-cfty Tax cases 60 ne
Tried--Procecdings In the
county cours-cascs fi'ea.

80. ~ ~ " WHY ttV>t eVt'iiS'tesi' 49, ~
ia,S pass;;ed by the last legislature yirtrnic
,,xes a ten months term o, this court 70
HDrris county. and this Is fs5rt OF m
programme,
The eppearanrt docket for me terri
VAS completed yesterday as follows:
ts.sss45R T. Lienowski vs.. ~ a, i',ia'ir
n,,d .rs r. Freeman: injunction
it.si while Iindcv vs. Matte LnaoN
divorce
Is. ST Howard Harrison Iron co,are ~.
is.5sSsJ. Ii. Brenond y; the Aiilier
, sxss7 Henry ~ Fsaena VA Job W waite
Il All tir4pass 10 trv title ana astnA6es..
1855 John ssoiiand vs. Thco- Keller e
isss ~ S Tiiits' vcixht W. Louise volghs
lsl1q Ex parte 4. II en-. minority. !. ),
ssnta W Ithtiway rnrssnfiy ON ehAnEe
81 Venue from Galveston. cor1fy.
5p12 Rerfka Stern W. Or. A. r. stew
rs Is anseiina y Davis is, Ellen q:
Davis change Of venue rroiii 9flFeston
csag s II Tsns XII rom nn s;aysstSa Ssanty
is a18-Ch arles y. Turner rs. H.
yVeiner. iniuncticn
lF,es n & 5s.Ese. %. a cfeenral e
iV'sos snna =. Dyer ". p Dyer d.
g 'sslo 4Rebecca a. McDcnnld vs.. Aaron
is'S ;1.i'@ ~ o. Mcnart ct al w. A
Boa rranpas4 IL Try lille ard damages.
Farm 5ui- and Land easnpsnr. debt.
Tksis--FAsf7iie ~ Mccarthy IS. 3. w
Mccarthy. divorce.
is.afs- Eliien socla vs.. r. NJ socia. d.
i5sil- Tfanle Jonnr ct AZ y Ban ttuteh;
1875 Joseph Mcguire a ca vs.. 9. A.
1875 y. s. Lyon & CO. ys. 2. b. Lans-
i5sso-sJ. ~ womaek rs Houston city
i5.sm- Bertha stern ", Fred Eriehson
iSss3 Fred Cole vs. . II. Burnett ana
Cora p FOAter. trespass 10 try utse
isss5-w. u. Baney vs. 81. = BAILEY.
divorce.
lssss,- Hsinze Lowry 6 Co. vs, n
Is ~ III. b Phipps Ct al ". Susan
Palmer Il al tr,espass 20 Try title
1888 Elijnh Fields -. Emma FIELDS
Is Nm. Thomas vs.. Houston Oh
Refining company, damages.
1hesi-Mrs ~. J.. Young vs.. ". A. !
Yong. divorce
rs 1-Nilhelnina Jamhor vs.. Chnriea I
Jarufot divorce.
isass Frank TeEnpleton ct al vs.. D. |
a. Murphy e al land suit
iRs5t-J j. Lyies Ct al VS.. W. ID. I
FleVeisnl. Injunction
iSsss :losenhine y. Spear ys. Jos. d
1sae7-Afarr y. scoreEa vs. q. ". I
Scoregas divorce.
sn5 Beripg Manufacturing company
rs Geo Krnifniin e a.. debt.
J5pip--E. y, G-instead e. I'll vs. King
& Fordtfan IT al. infiftclfnr
ii1-t,iasence Hetarney VI. Eliza
iseis- Afegeg Eros VI Al F. Ammef-
rrepn et a.. debt
isss:lssac GARNER -. sauis Gard
ll.ssa e AlhFscht " J J. Mig. lard
1905 Royai G. pecrow et al ". Cave
Winch e ~ la;,d siit
is gis-A scheffer ". Aug seseetsr.
= ~ " y Bakers executors vs.
lshrsntnrs & A. land suit,
q, lasisE T. Heplrins ". Anna Z. Hop
y sss s. Ke5.sr V Houston East
&ur .Mes lf1af Hallway company. debt
!, ~, ,a''o-steesrt Clark ". Peter Williams.
iEp5l-c; . Grunewaa ys. W. L. Wien
kamp 81 Al, land suit.
,, is:,s2-W 2 GribDle " Il, Rigsby ct al,
s, lsase g Lumm IS. IL Green
y 's y IsI.I5sl,e9 s Tufagys Alexander
l5.ass -Ioila Zimmerman W cry or
i "a BoslischeIi rs. w. J. r.Yi,ie
iy,a9ys-l. 4 cushman Manufacturing CO.
w y Her Gas Governor Co, debt
4 "a s,,,, =, foiser W ,. r D. Wilson.
l5,979-M Kphlnan e al vs. Anna Ru.
r. ~ land suit.
!, y z. slil-, William wlmberloy W. ]. q
5n6a1 George RinEie 3, p.,,t ~. 4
n, partition.
ia.Vgs-- Mary ); chsppcii ct Al w b n
ihnlsun 81 al, partition Il
lRvvi -ft3ayQu City Lumber comnan, - :
fnuhlQn Investment company def,, - :.
. iR;'se,1A- 4. Moore vs. Frank Dunn
i5sese--clty Of Houston We. r.. II. Eisin I
4 n y nes Same " John brooks, taxes. &
X ia a. g, ". y D Duxberry. taxes
les'nlo-ssame vs. j G. Cain. taxes. q
49, 3,Ssl7. .ss rs William and Eliza I,
1 1.'s,l22 Same ys, wlllaln IsrsUs. ta-tos Z
11.,.si- fHtuf ". o. II Chapman faTes
! , I ~ ve Mrs Lucy Berkeley 4
/. l xsl ". d. and !. Daniels g
ll3'3Le~ sane " AIfa Sarah KAN taxes
Same va J. i Doran 49, ~ ''sAfH' Y
is' ot sD1TrSanic w u w. Ardesber,e tares Y,
y. - ' ~ ~ Henry ana Louise Kim. v
asd s:sllss W. :. f,s;issr ct All ia,e. o'
ss'H Xxx same W. y. Borner faxes ~ss,
, s'es5 same vs. Henry Clay, ta.,s fns
l9ph4 same ". 9. " Docrlns 7ava. jn
~, se e -Sanie vs.. Mrs. j. CornI1R 800 III
,se,r same ~. VIM DickInaen 49,. / Il.
y, ~ anne vs. Mrs. M bribbia 800 NJ
II snS same W. Andrew Dow sa.ea 'eV'.
Il. rs. same vs. III L. Dow, taxes 4.
Y rg hane W, q H. Dayldsnn fsxa. "
,nsgl Same Va, Daniel bean t,ae..s ~
y 81 al taxeH sVihpa- ~
y y sss Same ~ 2. DaitrIeh taxes Sc
v sas 3tlnr W. Caesar DAVIS fa@ea ~
p no same ~. Mrs II Dunlan 80
y seg ZANE W. Van Duncan. faxea nc
IA ir'i'- same vs. G. III Danlelnen ~ 81 10
Y r i'ss Fame W.. Jacob Caleb. taxas m
Y 'r''i Same W, Mrk tt Damtjfh f.xA. Ia
~ ~ ,s1 nnme Va Hugh BurnF tnres q.
~ W -Same w. Jas r. numbis fa~es
w Same ys, handle Beavicy, fares A..
lt',Y Same W, g Die(sohfi Nj = IL s,ss y ~
= rt9i same ". il. " Selaof,, taxes "
~ Vi2 Same w. a Hoaid iSsta ~
ie,Wprsnme ~. Mrs. a. A. Corfes "a ~ te
n 0I-. r. =. =. -. A.. - -. ~