Little Falls transcript. [volume] (Little Falls, Morrison County, Minn.) 1876-1894, 1893-03-10
DO1NGs OF THE COURT
Spring Term of District Court for
Morrison County Convenes on
Monday, March 6.
George Baxter, Who Stabbed Frank
Sehimmerhorn at Randall Not
Indicted
Insurance Case Decided in Favor Of
Mrs. Smith and Will Go to
Supreme Court.
Alex. Gravel is Indicted for Murder of
Artman and Pleades Not
Guilty.

ing q caution, he called their at
tention to the liquor law as follows:
Selling Of liquor without license, sell
ing Of liquor to Indians, students in
the public school, or minors.
The jury then retired in charge OF
officer Bentfeld. .-
The following cases have already
been disposed OF:
1. st. P & N. P. r. r. Co.. vs. N. P. Clarke
Taylor, Calhoun Rhodes, for plaintiff: Geo.
W. Stewart for defendant.
r. Continued.
+ 2. st. P. & N. P. r. r. Co. vs. N. P. Clarke and
Clara c. Mcclure. Taylor. Calhoun & Rhodes for
plaintiff; Geo. W. Stewart for defendants.
Continued.
8. Louis Peterson VS.. Ingre Peterson.
I.indbergh & Adams for plaintiff; +. Nelson for
defendant.
Continued.
4. Lillian B. Clark VS.. James B. Clark. CA
Lindbergh & F. A. Lindbergh for plaintiff
Stricken from calendar.
s. Christina f, Osell vs.. Andrew Osell.
A-iuuOcI Su ~ AudHlS pltIIHtII. a. :, Ddll-
chard for defendant
Continued.
8. Frank Long VS.. Frank I. schlief. Taylor.
Calhoun & Rhodes for plaintiff: s. Smith for
defendant
Verdict for plaintiff.
TO- N. P. Clarke vs.. Samuel Trebby. Lind
bergh ( Adams and Reynolds & Stewart for
plaintiff; A. r. Blanchard for defendant
Continued.
II. L. E. Ellsworth VS.. Jas. II. Hurin. A. P.
Blanchard for PLAINTIFF Taylor. Calhoun &
Rhodes for defendant.
Verdict for plaintiff.
-. Stephen Boudreau vs. Frank Long. A. P
Blanchard for plaintiff; Taylor, Calhoun 4
Rhodes for defendant.
Settled.
ID. Samuel Trebby vs.. N. P. R. r.. Co., and
W. J. Sullivan. A. P. Blanchard for plaintiff:
Taylor, Calhoun & Rhodes for defendant.
Dismissed on motion of defendant.
Il. John Benokin VS., n. P. R. R. Co., A. P.
Blanchard for plaintiff; Taylor, Calhoun &
Rhodes for defendant.
Jury out.
Is. F. NJ. Lawhead VS.. L. J.Cale B. f. Harris
horn for plaintiff; W. S. McClenahan for defend
aut.
Settled.
Is. Engstrom. Ostlund ( EcElund vs. Bottom
Bros. C. A. & F. A. I.indbergh and A. P.
Blanchard for plaintiff; F. w. Lyon for defend
ant. .,
Continued.
20. Catherine F. Trebby vs., A. P. Blanchard
as administrator, ct al Taylor, Calhoun &
Rhodes for plaintiff; E. P. Adams and S. Trebby
for defendant.
Stricken from calendar on motion
OF defendant.
SO. Elmer E. House vs.. Rose Rebecca House.
A. P. Blanchard for plaintiff.
This twas divorce case and was
tried by the court Monday afternoon.
Elmer charged that Rose Rebecca
was not true to him and had at
various times committed adultery
and finally deserted him. Rose did
not answer to the charges, and
Elmer's request for divorce was
Oil lCI anu IC w CHl Il W dy St 1Icc
man.
After being out about two hours
the jury in the case of John Benolkin
VS.. the Northern Pacific Railroad
company brought in a verdict for
defendant.
1t seems that Ben Meyers had sold
! To ~ tn S,,1E
OF Swanville and it was delivered on
track at Flynn's siding. John
Benolkin purchased nine cords OF
wood from Meyer and after it was
loaded Sullivan billed it out as
belonging to him. Mr.. Sullivan's
wood was marked with an S and
it is claimed that this mark was on
| the wood which was loaded by
Benolkin's men.
The next case called was that of
Chas. W. Bouck VS.. Wilhelm Smith.
Smith gaveBouck an orGerfor one hay
rake, a bunle carrier and one Wood
mower. When the machinery came
Smith claimed it was Champion
mower he had ordered and
| asked Bouck to get him one which
he did. Smith finally refused to
take anyof the machinery. p
The jury returned a verdict for
plaintiff without leaving the box,
and Smith will have to pay for the
machinery.
16. Brooks & Co, vs. +. J.. Sibert F. w.
Lyon for plaintiff; Taylor, Calhoun 4 Rhodes for
defendant +. = s,5
| Continued,
/ II. Emma Davis VS.. John Davis. A. r.
Blanchard for plaintiff; E. 5 Smith for defendant.
Referred to r. S. Clark to take
testimony and report to court.
10, Agnes Ledoux VS.. Frank swankle. F. w
| Lyon for plaintiff; r. S. Clark and E.. S. Smith
for defendant.
/ Verdict for plaintiff for 1888. Stay
OF 30 days granted.
20. F. W. schieble vs. stephen schwarts Tay-
lor, Calhoun Rhodes for plaintiff; F. w Lyon
for defendant. 3{
Judgment Of $601 and interest for
plaintiff. Stay OF 10 days granted. &
%. Emma P. Smith VS.. Mason's FraternaI Ac-
cidentai Association. Taylor. Calhoun 4 Rhodes
for plaintiff; R. ]. Bengelhorn for defendant.
On trial. .=s
n. A. Kelly & Co. vs. Samuel Trebby. Lind
bergh & A dams for plaintiff: $. Trebby for de.
PENDANT. &S
Stipulation for Judgment.
The case of James Gravel vs.. Jos.
Paquin was referred to E. p. Adams
to try and report alignment.
One of the most interesting cases
on trial SO far this term was that oil
4 Emma F. Smith vs.. Mason's Frater-
MI Accident association. Taylor,
Calhoun & Rhodes OF this city APP
peared for the plaintiff and r j Ben
4 gelhouse Of Minneapolis for defend.
ent. Mr.. Calhoun tried the case and
Fit was very interesting to hear these
4 learned gentlemen bring out the fine
points OF law in the case
The circumstances of the case arr
! as follows: j. Il. Smith, miller
held q policy Of s., 900 in the above
manned accident associa ton. and last
4 spring he was kicked by colt and o
a few days later died from his Injuries