San Antonio daily light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1886-1907, 1893-10-02
OPENING OF COURTS.
JUDGMENTS RENDERED IN
JUDGE NOONAN'S COURT. !;
C5rand Jurors and BailIffs Selected
Gases Dealt WIth-Justices'
Courts and Notes.

The Thirty-seventh and Forty
fifth district courts opened this
morning for the October term.
There were no judgments rendered
in Judge Kings court.
The following were summoned
as grand jurors for the October
term of the Thirty-seventh district
court: Charles Hugo, foreman; j..
b. Wright. Ernest Stoves, John
BOssharlt, Hunter Barrow, w. H..
Irwin, F. Bormann, Eli Arnaud, j.
l.. NORM, W. }. GOfOrth, J. NJ.
George and William Menger. FszsaSs
The bailiffs are Hermann Faust,
George Beigel, Ed. NORM, James
Irwin, Geronimo Quintana, Will
liam SOmmers.
In the Forty-fifth district court
this morning the following was
'1One=
T. b. Dwyer ct al. VS.. Lizzie Cros-
son ct al, to construe will; defen-
.dant demands jury. - -
VIM. Davis ct al. VS.H.B. Andrews
ct AL, transferred from the Thirty
seventh district court; plaintiff de-
mands jury and set for October 9.
=. =. ?. Johnston VS.. c. Michel, to
1Jry title and for damage; plaintiff
demands jury.
L. =. p. Johnston VS.. II. w. and
G i. Mullaly, to try title and for
damages; plaintiff demands jury.
c. +. King vs.. San Antonio Street
Railway company, appeal from
justices court; plaintiff demands
jury.
Thomas W. Mullaly ct al. VS.. The
City of San Antonio, damages; set
for October IS.
II. l.. Holland VS.. O.C. Guessaz
ct al, damages; plaintiff demands
a jury.
Cyrus J. DOlph VS.. Emma De
SIEVE, damages; plaintiff asks for
leave to make parties.
A. and Felicia Pelltonvs. F. V.
BeZe, to try title and for damages ;
plaintiff given leave to file first
amended original petition.
William Mueller ct al. VS.. H. f.
Stevens, appeal from Justices
court; plaintiff demands jury.
W. F. Mitchell VS.. A. f. McCar.
ty, debt and attachment; contin-
ued to make parties.
Mary II. Moore VS.. George w.
Moore, divorce; plaintitf given
leave to withdraw title papers.
37th DISTRICT COURT.
Mary b. WhitlOck VS.. James
Wilde WhitlOck, divorce; continu-
ed by consent.
Bernheim Bros. VS.. O. H. Fielder
ct al, debt and sequestration; con-
tinued by consent.
A. D. Bell ct al. VS.. d. & A. OPP
pcnheimer ct al, debt; continued
by consent.
c. l.. Dignowity ct al. VS.. VIM.
l.. Locke, ct al, mandamus; con.
tinued by consent.
Henry krempkau ct al. VS.. r
p. Mccall ct al, partition; passed.
Henry G. Wagner ct al. VS..
George Witte ct all, to remove
cloud from title; set for Friday
and jury demanded by defendant
Albert F. Sawyer VS.. the San
Antonio Street Railway company
damages, two cases; dismissed al
plaintiffs costs.
l.. Enron VS.. San Antonio Street
Railway company, damages; dis.
missed at plaintiffs costs.
Rose F.Claridge VS.. F. r. Brown
on promissory note; dismissed al
plaintiffs costs.
Olsen & Wake VS.. the California
Insurance company ct al, dam
ages; set for Saturday and jury de-
lmanded by plaintiff.
The Gulf, West Texas and Pa
ecific Railway company VS.. F. f
Burr, contract; continued for ser
wices.
tChristiana Will VS.. the San An
tonic Rapid Transit Street Railway
company, damages; continued by
consent.
Il. w. Finley, financial agent TO
Texas state penitentiaries, VS.. w
J. Williams and Monterey Refrig