The Houston daily post. [volume] (Houston, Tex.) 1886-1903, 1893-12-10
PATRICK'S PLEA FILED,
HIS FULL ANSWER TO DIsuAR-
MENT CHARGES.
lie Claims That in the FIRST Trt"i
He and Not Congressman hutche-
son was the one Trled-Ai
the Allegations Denied

exceptions to the charges brought 70 u''
bar him IN the United States court
United States circuit court ior tne s I'''a,
crn district ot Texas, Ihe Sti .,' r.. ia
vs. \, Patrick Coiulu',s,,mlr,icnt hersi1,
And nogV comes the respohuC ..,. n.y. 800.
Albert ~. Patrick, IN MS own plupStt -
son. VARYING the issuance ~ W. 'i.',DT,tti,
such citation ms t4c tltIN 49, 10, titsd
issue upon said motion or Soiip.,''i ~ o,t,
rlrcin ana the order ot tu, In ,yt,e,.
leferred 10. and FIRST ules the iou9"lis'
Exceptions to said motion nlu VI .o,d
i bs HI suoudcut eAceptS 70 o."
c,,,,,,,i5,,, a., no,lon filed herein by the
,iIgt,I.t o.foruov Because the same ~
moi sworn 10 moi made In r1e mnnncr a llnl,a
form al directed by the law laEts' --'--''
i'S'' t s,.e,i tbe first and third para.
era,,bs ~ san charges being all OF slld
motion. except the 90. 2nd parastdph - -,
OF a. e. that put beng quvl"tlu'a y III
said orderj ar maqg9 upon III 9,nnav and
rvcoeitl In oyfent and scope OF IT'S aIlssa-
ti5ns Ind order Of the said judge ana arc
uusworn to by said Hannay.
lipcnuee thc saiu motion by saiu az.
torncy mud tin. order Di the court 90 no.
specifically tllcse amy oiLrn'S lo' -
this rcspondput may oe IeIu'!va w. a.
s,yar r gsr d, hlrr lie llaV bic ulnl h.ll
Bectuse e appears from an Inspection
nf tn. 5rlsf OF elid court that snld oIHaL
* not the presentmcnt OF pIe8ty!l,l5
iudge within the meaning on w 5,t g.
,vhieh This rrspondent should answer OF
which should stand as IN h.Cu.' W.
arainst THIS RESPONDENT, nut thll ~ ~,
same on IT, tasa W." ii5b qetgi to proceed as
INV attorney might voluntarily 40 ~
Virfrc ~ ths statute by making chat
based upon prlg aneS ~ individ,,ni re-
sponsibnity and oath Of the sad Attor-
NJ rtrSiIise neither IN said motion or
In a1tI order IS any iht-
1i,nrtiv alleged AGAINST this respondent
Lu, seid motion and said order are sun
Div n iuass OF legal conclusions, lnieT-
eiiSe it6 en-, the said motion does not
cHarge any facts or make any alleBaIo"'
against This respondent. s,id mo
rbe only allegations made III sun sun, , u'T
,jnr ls That the court did make cettaiin
tinIlnrs" which findings are recileu ~ ~.
enid motion as the predlcale 10 ~ ~ in,y
r"sr,nlont to answer herein inc NV
l-,,in thnt this respondent can hot ~
cIt6d 10 answer on b. pun'shsp iol - So,
iudicial OF the cNus Juneau IIHV W., S2gt6.
acts OF Judge tohrmLhi I'M ardar to
ing In said motion or IN sall ul ,,tv '0
.r1y. tbnt this respondent was lh..sE,,3
t sr,. ,yay utrtlCiput III ~ Stll my ny
iurs" This rcsp'hltni " ~ Ara com
az and Is not bound Dy any oFag,' ,,i,ie
lVi ~" an "GullnEs" made by any Jus
,a ,,v matter or proceeding TO "I''e" "e
is no! a par yne charge against TINS re- re-
,..,.,,,l3.s,F an 1uif.r r=s.utlu1 To- ''' 80
-i,is respondents motives are Xxx .,t,rt
pIt,.. nowhere l3 ID alleged Nt.t 'W... ,..,,''t
~. arftinlly uls,Jd, or mat TINS Ic7l'oii-.
, 20 In a po-ltIoH t. unACtl Inc S1''i 30
al, iiaf mis- respondent Intended 10 mn
lead the court or haj Ely l, ,t,,1snsloo an thc
therein, or th"l u mus" tbia rpssou,ient $
motives aid uuvc I'm the silEhl iHn,'''o '.
influenced thc proceeding men in'il.n. :,
mat he court mad sny rsht W'uteIT .i,, ~
he informed as to Jna m0QNt l2h'ilhh
this respondent IN Cd pro. 5','iAH 40 Nts''i
Uutcaraon. the mot-n o! A'l.ll.F - f,t
nay herein it preHiS-''l' ny" * ,r,a
ni."d 'l..ts Hh' -; e., III1ec,,,a,r,,. eLng.
We "uly p"tl"h mo VIZ P'ts"iiiI ~ go"
tnut tine Etut or lhNetrht" on ilt 1851.
wis me 9uN ls"ur WI lue '"Se' Nc H..
tIn district attorney 4i-i,tj "i ilut'"e7 ~
a'l t.r euler go l.Il ~ mo lhi1 ~. I'lnI j.,
cnJa inAtNf+' 'nVll ItaH' b'hh gone WIN
va, tu' W.. W." .'' ',, ,iit ~.
SON ~ "AhiHE d. 51Ape r'ht OF mus
~ .''..5 '-'.a nv ' '-tN' ,.'. W. ~ WI, '.,,
1Tn"H ~ ay i..L l. lnt same Ents hrN -lN
lta.'i ana VOID, ANA should be. GXpunsei
...-n W. ''taH, HnLgh .ugu!l NOT De
r' %. ,i'' yer io 40
,t7' H'y" 'N..'. or L." a'llu-''
,n IN r.!".' = 90 SO Is To Hfo5tl-
,4-r '"' 'NN. IONS VI DEGREES 10 lIc-itl-
81 I''.lili"h IN motion on
D. .,, ~ ,.,, :, l't4"H "nlyHia M a. cause
I.I.t',.., y'r,," a. ~ r"tiDit "i
,,-nI. ~ j,., "i STATUS
lnt.l 'ntn tw.lr,"t, @ '' ne, ,,Gl guy t'"uS
.rrff DO tn, r. az. ,'.,...l 4l ,u.
Imrl!er % tpnfrai..l meant 'r .t,t r'
While thcorr.i,.Ilv ain men ,r,,.ors IS
pr. IaIlv who r.g..t IA t,', s,,frt- r.r
Irt.rta of fna ,,uri'' iis il,. ,.,.,, ~ i,,,,,
cst effort 10 get Justice .rr thcmselvcs OF
al.aHt, rnt z me. u ~ urfug. tho court
are not "aWlrua clriuc." Technically. and
tn light of Do" authorities, am "amicu-
HflTiue'' i~ "a person. usuaIly hut moi nI