The Holt County sentinel., 1893-12-22
H9CkEr.
tIr'Hif tuu.i. .sli,uarH Ts,r:n,
s.;.Sa,
C:tii. DDttKET.

C:tiiI Dos GKET.
IainD pAN. 1.iCRiD,y. JAN. j. 1891.
/. Martin * Sheridan i,r,ls VS.. &. u.
Cropp anu jacob G.ocs uecls: appeal
from j. T..
:. Milton Grimes IS. Geo. ". Quick
anu james Il. Wilson; Il au.:,ye
). la The matter "a the as>Ignmen.
>! L. H. CiiadGicH * = 4. A. DvuSniy
.-s!Enee, a.s.su!nout.
i. James ii. Cropp ~. Cason {.
';Fopp. ,aIt on note.
FouKrH DAY, s8fD,y, IAN. =, 1884.
>. Z. NJ Hunt W. Au,s iiI.mll:
appeal from J. L.
u. J. IL L,wrey vs. H. q. Ma,tison;
appeal from j. T.
=. J"h. ". Speer vs.. J. ". BAN;
appeal from }. l..
). =. ID. Keiiie. vs. Israel DAWSON
ami r. l.. Hart: appeal }. 4.
FIFTH DAY, SATURDAY JAN. 4. 1884.
9. Harriet Ia: or ys. Robert :. Fay
ipr: GivprCe.
IL. Mary f. C,e..:an VS.. Michael
C,chrti:, atyorca.
Ii. Hannah NJ. Butler VS. Cyrus j.
B1i.er; divorce.
l.. T.hiiitiie IIo'i'rE sS AZURE"
Hooper: divorce.
il. Getty Btker VS.. George Baker:
divorce.
II. Anna c. McRidse IS +. f. Nc
kiiSe: divorce.
sINrH DAY. MONDAY, JAN. s, 1884.
l.. T.. n Riser VS.. y. L. Murray aud
Son; APPEAL from j. p.
Is. John W. Bridsmon vs.. ". 4.
HIT; and 4. >. Smell; appeal from j. Z.
10. Fred Hahn vs. banker Bros; ac-
count.
-. john Bishop VS.. Charles y. Nc
!ntlre; damage.
SEVENTH DAY. TUESDAY JAS. Q, 1894.
~. Maud D.usher;y vs Haley b.
Williams; damage.
- john l.. Dryden Us. The Farm
ers' Mu ual Fire ami Lightning inaur
auce ca: evil action.
-; ;Iuii, Sivil.e vs. ID. l.. Hu;tstet
Ter and }. III. Euiisie;te.; suit ou note
n. Maud D.,usnerty ". Kerry Vii
hams, garLlshec oi Haley Is. Nl,iiams:
GnriistimeiIL under attacnnient.
D. Jonn Co.xe!l and Misses Colwell
- Joseph Parish: appeal from J. Z.
". VIA GrvrsDech vs.. E,i Stokes
aud Daniel GuiiiIams: repleyIn.
-. Frazer Il kruZcr VI. George Snod-
grass, d-feuja..l. Jasper SnoGGrass. In
teTpieader; appeal from J. Z.
2j. VS.. Thompson Il Co., vs.. Geo.
Sno,isfacS: attachment.
EIGHTH DAY, WEDNESDAY. IAN. 10, 1894.
-. john Pierce vs.. John Grigsby;ap-
peal from j. Z,
-. Crawford Hatlitf vs. Al. T.. Smith;
appeal frosEI j. Z.
81. Joocphu5 Grimes VS.. George ".
Quick; appeal from }. p.
:I2. Josephus Grimes VS.. George ".
Quick: damage.
::3. James Vance Us John Patterson;
appeal from J. p.
Il. Edward =. jackson VS. Nathan L.
Pir.ce; damage.
:3J. Amanda Z. Taylor 10y her next
friei.d. A,temus heilcy. VS.. Rebecca Pal
lem and Gilbert ". PulIem; damage.
NINTH DAY, THrssD,x. JAN. ii, 1891.
81, \. L. Mcpherson vs.. ". PMeyer;
suit on note.
35. A. l.. Mcpherson VS.. c. Cowan;
suit on note.
-. T. NJ. i.ric, ys. Aubra c. Spray;
appeal from J. z.
IL. A. L.. Nichols vs.. ". G. Hatfield
suit on note.
A.. Lucy 4. Shawhan ct al VS.. X. c
Glenn and Fannie Muudy: partition. :!
i3. Juretta J. Shirley VS.. Edwin
Shirley, Don Shirley. ct al: partition.
Ii. II. T. Davis Mil Co, VS.. c. A.
Doughty. f. Il. Chadwick and George
W. Butler: IepIevin.
ID. \. y. Saus;er & Co. vs. Wn. II |
Wales ST., WIN. II. Wales Jr.. and En-
ory 4. Wales.
IS. Frank b. Fried. admir- estate of |
Adam Liesa. deceased. rs Jacob Groes- T,
bacis; motion to set aside saia.
Il. Kohn Brothers VS. L. ". Walters: !
IS. VIM. B Arnold vs.. John C. Hin |
kle; suit on note.
40. Haary L. Alkire VS.. Robert G. |
Cuwan; suit on note.
VIM. II. Stsrrett vs. Gorge w. |!
Quick; suit or note.
5i. Joseph Wise. guardian Of Edward
ftedm md and lea Lsntz, VS.. George W. |
Gaskill, John N. Cannon, James A ,der
SOD. ct al; foreclosure.
81. james Crannel VS.. VIM. T. Grit
fifth; evil action.
a3. State by Collector vsKansas City,
ST. J. u L. B. railroad Co: tsx suit.