The Hawaiian gazette. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1865-1918, 1893-08-01

| SumpSlt. 4. BTOWn LOT plaiuJiHSI
Hatch for garnishee.
Pun Gee VS.. Loo Chez, damage; ap-
peal from district court, Honolulu.
Hartwell for plaintiff; Davidson for
defendant appellant.
h. b. Thomas VS.. Capt. Anderson,
damage; appeal from district court,
Honolulu. Ashford for plaintiff-ap-
pellant; c. Brown for defendant.
James Campbell VS.. j. f. Bowler,
assumpsit; appeal from district court,
Honolulu. G. Brown for plaintiff;
Creighton for neutrality-suspicious..
G. a. Brown VS.. Bulletin Publishing
Co, trespass on the case. Hatch for
plaintiff.
Man Hop Co. VS.. Lau Pew, damage:
| appeal from district court of Homo
lulu. Davidson for PLAINTIFF Castle
for defendant-appellant.
]. a. Low VS.. ]. NJ. Horner, action
on ajudgment. Neumann for plain
| tiff; e. w. Ashford for defendant.
Tung Yuk VS.. Ngao LUX, case.
Hartwell for plaintiff; Neumann-
Creighton for defendant.
Bishop & Co. VS.. c. +. Williams ct
al, assumpsit. Hatch for plaintiffs;
Attorney General for defendant.
@. A. Brown VS.. Prov. Govt. H. Is,
assumpsit. Hatch for plaintiff; At
torney-General for defendant.
Tong On Jan & Co. VS.. Akvna, alias
Seu San Wal, assumpsit. Hatch for
plaintiffs.
Allen & Robinson VS.. G.. w. Lin
coin ct al, assumpsit. Hatch for
plaintiff; Kinney for garnishee.
Allen Il Robinson VS.. F. II. Red
ward, assumpsit. Hatch for plain
tiff.
Allen & Robinson VS.. G. w. Lin
coin, assumpsit. Hatch for plaintiff.
Thos. Mott VS.. G. 7. Gulick, guard
ian, assumpsit. G. w. Ashford for
plaintiff; Kinney for defendant.
E. c. Criek VS.. E. G. Hitchcock,
marshal, damage. Peterson for plain
tiff; AttOrney-General for defendant.
I. w. Rawlins VS.. Honolulu Soap
Works Co., damage. c. Brown for
plaintiff; Hartwell for defendant.
G. a. p. Gardiner VS.. Il. G.. Hitch
cock, marshal, damage. Peterson
Creighton for plaintiff; AttOrney-Gen-
eral for defendant.
f. Schiefer VS.. Olowalu Sugar Co.,
case. Rosa for plaintiff; Hatch for
defendant.
Thow Choy VS.. E. G. Hitchcock,
marshal, case; appeal from district
court of Honolulu. Hartweu for
neutrality-suspicious.; Acknowledgement
for defendant.
Lau Chuck VS.. G.. E. Hitchcock,
marshal, case; appeal from district
court of Honolulu. Hartwell for
plaintiffappellant; ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
for defendant.
In re estate of ]. F. o. Banning, ap-
peal from Cooper, j., in chambers.
Hartwell-Kinney for plaintifFappel
liant; Hatch for the administrator.
JURY WAIVED.
Hawaiian Carriage Manufacturing
Co. VS.. ]. Kaiaikawaha ct al, assump-
sit. Creighton for plaintiff; c. Brown
for defendants.
]. NJ. RaposO VS.. j. j. Fernandez,
summary possession of land; appeal
from district court of Honolulu. Ma
COON for plaintiff-appellant.
S. L. Pierce VS.. Z. B. Thomas, as
appeal from district court of
Honolulu. Creighton for plaintiff.
Thos. Wright VS.. B. +. White, as
appeal from district court OF
Creighton for plaintiff;
A. l.. CrOn VS.. j. H. Love, assump-
sit; appeal from district court of Homo
lulu. Magoon for PLAINTIFF Peterson
for neutrality-suspicious..
Carl Henoch VS.. Hawaiian govern
ment, assumpsit. Hatch for plain
tiff; AttOrney-G for defendant.
j. and NJ. Padestre VS.. Maria Belica,
appeal from district court
of Honolulu. Kahookano for defend
Mary Camacho VS.. J. A. Magoon,
replevin; appeal from
district court of Honolulu. Defendant
in person.
NJ. w. McChesney & Sons VS.. Chas.
Lind ct al, assumpsit; appeal from
district court of Honolulu. Creighton
for neutrality-suspicious.; Magoon for
defendants.
P. G.. CamarinOs VS.. Chas. Lind ct
al, assumpsit; appeal from district
court of Honolulu. Peterson reigh-
.On for neutrality-suspicious.; MagOon
or defendants.
DIVORCE AND SEPARATION.
Falizarda Cabral VS.. Manuel Cabral.
Magoon for plaintiff; Achi for defen-
liant.
Alice Davies VS.. VIM. Davies.
Creighton for plaintiff; Neumann for
defendant.
Stella Gems VS.. Arthur Gems. A.
u. Brown for plaintiff
Ana MomOna VS.. Alma. Peterson
or plaintiff.
Mary B. Silva VS.. Frank Silva.
Rosa for plaintiff; Hartwell for de
endant.
Anastasia Mcdowell VS.. Arthur Me
)owall. Magoon for plaintiff.
James Sutherland vs.. Mary Suther-
and. Kinney for plaintiff.
George Vessels VS.. Kekahuna Wes-
els. Castle for plaintiff
Walanika, by her father, VS.. KiPu.
7. V. Ashford for plaintiff; KaulukOu
Or defendant.
Celestine johnson VS.. Abraham
ohnson. Kinney for plaintiff; Neu-
mann for defendant.
Hail IVY VS.. Naval Namailou.
sosa for plaintiff.
Rauinokaola Tazartia va Toa To