Evening journal. [volume] (Wilmington, Del.) 1888-1932, 1893-11-04
SOME BIG CASES LISTED
Bench Win Try to Clear Up
Civil and Criminal Doclzets.
]. HOOD WRIGHT AND aARNIsHEEg

D. aOUD WhldHI AND HAhNlSHbb
Personal Injury Suits Against the p, w.
SB., B. a o.. and Il. a p. Railroad Com
panIes The Wilmington city Railway
Company Must Defend ITSELF
The civil list for the November term
Of court contains many important cases.
involving large number OF individuals
and corporations. It will be almost i'm
possible to try all the cases: but the
bench has expressed determination to
sit from November 13 the adjourned
term, TO January l. if necessary, to clean
up the civil and criminal business
There is an unusually large number of
snits against tho city, railroads and
electric railway. Senator Gray Lew c
Bird, Willard salisbury, Jr, aud CITY
Solicitor Elliott and assistants will have
busy term II all the cases in which they
are interested ire forced to a trial bv
lawyers for the defense
Consid rable interest is manifested In
the outcome of the suits OF j. Hood
Wright vs. henry c. Robinsons
| garnishees
Among the cases on the list are
Joseph b. Martin VS. Every Evening
Publishing Company; Samuel D Forbes
VS.. the Mayor aud Council of Whining.
ton; Rebecca Emmons VS. Hope Lodge,
NO. 81, l. o. o + Union Bank of
Canada VS. James G Knowles; George
Hume vs.. the Mayor and Council of
Wilmington; Lille p. Gubb Ida NJ
Ball, Frank Perkins and Matte Per
N.ar
Frank Perkins, VS.. the Mayor and
Council of Wilmington Cspelle Hardware
Company vs. the Mayor ana Council of
Wilmington; Thomas L. Graham VS. the
Board of Public Education of Whining
ton; James Magill vs.. the W. IN r r.
Company; Salie G Roam and Thomas j.
Samsel, administrators Of Mary Robinson.
deceased, VS. the p, w. &B Rail
road Company: Frank b. Carpen
ter We. the Mayor and Council
OF Wilmington; same VS. the
Board of Public Education of Whining.
ton; Harry Richards VS. p, W. &B.
K Company: William Murphy VS..
the P, w. * B Railroad Company: John
>. breslin VS. the Edge Moor Bridge
Works; owen J. Hession and seventeen
others VS.. the Mayor and Council of viii.
mington; Wesley E. Parsons VS. the
r, w. a B K. r. Company; William
Helmrath VS.. the Delaware Morocco
20 Peter w. Burton vs. Enoch Moore;
Thomas G. Else & Co, Decon Brothers.
Freeman * Wise, Lveright, Greenwald
Co, Klein, Pretzel & Co Emanuel
MALI Son VS.. Jacob H. Topkis and
William Simmons, sheriff; Frank A.
Mitchell and Francis Small VS. the
Mayor and Council of Wilmington;
Arthur B. Wilson VS.. the Harlan &
hoilingsworth Co James Stroud aud
Lille b Osler VS. the Mayor and Conn
Gil OF Wilmington; John Il. Dickey VS.. the
Republican Printing Company Catharine
Beble vs. the p, w & B. r K Co.
CHARLES L. Taylor vs.. same; William H
tennimore VS. same; Melissa Dutton. ct
AL VS. Wilmington City Railway Com
pany Char es w. s Roth's administrator
VS. the Wilmington City Railway Com
pany Robert Maxwell administrator VS.
the Wilmington City Railway Company
Francis Burke vs.. the Wilmington
Dental Manufacturing Company; Wilbert
=. Cook VS.. the B & p R. r Co Sarah
NJ. winchester VS. same; Samuel Ban |
croft, Jr, vs. Jacob Pussy; First
National Bank VS.. p. T. r Smith; John |
Jacooy VS., B y o r r Company; John |
norris VS. 3 P. r r Company Mary |
l. Mcllvaine VS.. P, w. & B r r Com |
Pany George Benson VS. Mayor and |
Council OF Wilmington; Joshua L. |
Smith, VS. Wilmington Oty Railway |
Company; Benjamin w. Oakford Va |
Walton and Whann COMPANY: Letitia |
X. Dunlap vs. the New Jersey and VIII !
mngton Ferry Company; James r
Wilson VS. p, w. * B. Railroad Com
pany Sarah s. Botson va. same Charles
Reidel VS. same; Isabella d. Wright VS.
same William P. Mcconnell VS.. same
Michael Duffy VS.. Brandywine Granite
company; William NJ Strickert VS.
Diamond State Iron Company: William
II. Lee vs.. Mayor and Council Of viii
mington; George W. Wiggles-
worth VS.. Wilmington City Railway
Company Russell Craig's administrator
vs.. the p. w. B L r Company; John
johnson VS.. same Maryina Wulinska VS.
same }. Howard Wright VS.. Edgar
Chandler, garnishee of Henry c. Robin
son same VS. Stansbury J Wiley; same
vs. w. Scott Vernon same VS. Howard
h. Vernon; same VS. George Churchman's
same VS.. Francis y Buck same vs. Hsr
Ian Cause same vs. Mary n. Rolston
same vs. Wilmington Dental Manufactur.
ing Company.
Among the cases set for argument are
tho following for divorce. Thomas Il
w. Caroline Council: Frances l, va.
Charles Emory Coleman William l. VS..
Maggie l. Booker; Laura E.vs. George p
Baldwin; Lucy b VS. George w. HAYES:
Mary $ VS. Wilmer o. Davis: Louisa
w VS.. William II Thomas: Holden w.
Anderson VS. Jennie p Anderson.
MARRIED.
Ash- ALA sli b. the Asbury NJ. f. par