New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1893-02-19

=.
and mazda ,.,,uotlc poto. rrnn tlrm He
candidate I'm tIn .>,ifinc Navo,iIty election OF 1,7..
and c,mc within a few thousand votes Of election
~ ,,of MAGISTRATE Of the city. lie WIS nominated
- ."'i .r, In, ho, ,,.t ont Of
| ny iammahN Ian avn i'''" ~ ,, 49,, ,,.i.
power In that orgi'lH"'l'h' IL - " law 49,,
,y and before nj, election 10 Il )ud~ MP hau "''l
,.,, ,rtr Ilc ,ro. = member Of
inc '""'''"''""'' . ai,, ,d,ico to tbo
''''', j" ,,,., lad tb. Tvood ring
' - 1d Laurence = dicnitcG
III r'rS'h'l 'pl''"'','' '7 - NM, do,,.,por
ana u" has uh''""iiS e''" ~, n.' y.,t.p
'o""l" 'l' n''""', VI To- ~ -. .rof,lI,
"''"S N."''' i -, ru1.,, v.n1 c..sn when II
prepared WIZ 'n'' J" wv , . NOT .,,s
WAS first before the courts. His view w'S NOT S"9
,,o 80, tho ,,oioritv Of the Court 81 Appeals but
,ho o,iuion of n:uN law writers I'm other states WIS
strongly favorable =" ,'' @ cH he laid down would
ANY, anu, , r hn, hr.n extremely popular In the com
| unuidV ITdcr Lawrence f. II old NcwIork stock
his ancestors haNih7 p''h p0"'' "
iars'
m ,t ,,.odv made for the Cabinet II
- L., c,,.l,,d Indicate that LAWYERS viii have
M ,or,or, ,nnu.nr. I'm National affair, I'm tho next
,r voor. AZ least five Of the cabinet places VIII
49, ci,od ,r ,.nl.r. of The legal profession. Judge
w nm ~ ,,.,,i,. ,,onu,,r with many members
VI! ,"'", a, ,. ,ho,rh no has been considered at
| % INV ,,dnTc,. ,,,,iu.t increasing the
.. - oornor, ,ior. has been noticeable In many Of
,,', All TINT has been known I'm this Satr
| =, u, .,,i,b a. q Coorda man shows an even
! .,a. ,,,,oocv AGAINST corporations. Mg. ri~Scll
! , . -. ,,,u luo,r,, among the lawyers outside OF
| - ~, ,,,,, ,.,li.l.. proctice - a lawyer
ba L.en Subordinate I'm puhic motto" 10 lh' p"h,l''i
rcpuiation In every Administration lh' r"NtrI' I,
mtulal nv in,rr~r SOON. especially DESTROYS
~ bavu,, member, of the Bar among his close advisers
|
| The last week .ccm> 10 have hcon m uhIor'"'H'
! on, for New YORK lawyer. one has been on ui'i
on charc, Of perjury and another who offered h'ul-
| Golf nc 81 witness in the same wa, placed nhuer
| -, -. d,..c,ou ~ tho Iudrr on a charge Of forgery
| ~ - n, nod r,odo fin, strange aclnOwlcd--
! In III" hr-' degree. i'' III" num- wv ~ - -. -
| ment that hc had made fal," cefuhcatr On a -.
which to be- rrcori"i. Two "',rl NV, Tor con.
| Tempt of court. and will BE- compelled 10 answer II"
their words or H''l"h''
| , u.,.1 c,,to,nnt ~ court bv at
| ''h'F '''.' -, % tn. ~ La, ,yrcll
The most NOTABLE case II recent years Is uu'' VI ''
| attorneys OF William VI lN''" ~ III .'''' III " ,
ber lo7.} His counsel before ih" tria began ui''
T., ,,,iu, , p,o,.,t vi ch they handed thu Judge
prc siding Justice Noah Davis, against MS acuhR III
fine trial on the ground, that he had Nho"h vi 4"
previous trlal that he had an cVhlNh IL I" '' "'i'
! Of the case. and that he III" r'iu~" !" ''-
| the jury must diNNElr" I'' "i'"'" - j" go,
| any. judge Davis deferred a'u'h q" 'n' P'p'i "''
| The trial was Over ANU ''" -. 80
| Graham william full'r''h "I" W.
| Burilrii the principal counsel III inc "'''
| $3.50 each for contempt OF court nv J"''"' ~
| l'l were disc'arS 81 without " "e' ''' Al,
afrrwnrd reversed III" ''''' r,, n,,.
| cI>,on as to the contempt P''''"''-' ' .,,.I,
| Field who had act'" WIN 'W," ,,,., ,ro.
| to The Albany Law '""rh"I " "I@ anu .,',
! test against Judge DIVE "' '' ,. -
! in The Albany Law Jouiiai p""'" NV
! r..liu, DR. Kcn"ay and other lawyers III ihlpoI'"".
English trials 10 show that great freedom was allo""'
| ''"e ,, ,,,trv An Indiana lawyer some
lawyers In mat '"uh''H' W. ' -, ,,. td
| - g., ,,,.rir., , dismissal OF an action he began
,'. With ,l,e., words: Having become salts
other Indiana judg" found iaMErr T arS lion
nFa.s' ,d,s c,S,cis.d him he reortd: "T This l. a
c" ~ a1ninat,on and II cannot examine our VII
| ness he can stand aside tpmpar'E'N Pm ",,,,, -;
however in Wlrh laWHrrS t,,,,, IA Nm. rial Judge
| son'.arlr r,d I'm IA, law books
|
The statement few DAYS ago that the ul'''"ru -. u
| rrcnchman, De Lc,,eps, Is SIN unconscious "
fact that he has been tried. convicted ana S''"''u
| ia, 4 long term Of imprisonment SHOWS !" -
difference between the mehoiN OF IN 'n'"
and the course adopted in this country ~ '"'''
| nr. the. courts to secure the rlgit ol u' "''
Inc nrrs,ut M every stage Of the proceeding ''' Nv"
| trials have been granted II an hdlFlhn'i J""r ','
| . =, tl,. sc.ne Of the crime to obtain Information
~ to The. locality in the absence oil ihr ac'"s'u
! Every witnes, must appear personally anu w w
r,ir.d lu th. presence Of the d't'hIlh'' "'" "''S
| nroc.cdIng flat take, plac" outside "i h'' "
connection with the trIa may BE- invalid. II the
| rrc - ston not oniy l. the defendant In som" c''''
| 1 ,i, .,i,f witness against himself ana s"DI''"u
| ' ,,i, IN ,h, ottcmpt TO make him en-
| to cross examination III wv =, -. 80, .o. d,
Wet him,cf but 1t Is also nio"""r 49, nin and son.
,r, nI, in his absence, and TO convict MN anu ~"
| "N nm " " L., =, ,l,c rul.s adopted IN tai,
tcnc" him M En,I3e the accused person is sup
| country ana III hl5,' ,,i he i proved guilty. bat
posed TO be lnnocrn, " -, TAXI, an oppo,ite view and
tn" French oo c,.G Il supposed be guilty until he
proves himself Ingoern ' IS that every innocent