Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1893-07-15
A Divorce Suit In Which Tho Husband
Figures As Petitioner
LlSeFORp AGAINST THE CITY.
The Defendants Oppose the Moilon to
Confirm the Report " Master har.
riOneaux. - Miscellaneous.

tale Of matrimonial woe, baslng his
complaint ON the ground OF the dc.
fendnnps cruel treatment and "uu-
wlfcly" conduct. His attorney was
Colonel Kalghn.
Mr.. Brown stated tina. hc married
his wife on October ian, 1871, o. Gay.
ton, state Of New York. and his DO.
havlor towards her had always been Of
The be,t. Ever since the FIRE, year OF the
marriage, however, the defendant had
been hRbltually cruel aud caused him
thereby much mental anguish, Ia
order to better his condition he came TO
Utah on January 18th, 1917, up to
which time they had resided together
al Rosie, County OF 81 Lawrence,
n. v, where tho defendant bull lives,
and no has since been engaged In
mining and blschemithiHg At Park
City and Alta. Up to the year 1858
plaintin continued 10 send his wife all
hlu savings, amounting Ia 90 10 $1,000,
over and above the cum nectsssry
Tor her maintenance. This was
invested IN a comfortable home
In Rosie. His wife, however,
without his know ledge or permission,
after purchasing this property, took
out the deed In her own name instead
Of that Of plaintlI, NJ he had requested.
In Sent, 1883, plaintiff LETT Utah and
returned TO Rosie, with the Intention
OF permanently residing with his wife.
II was then he learned, for the ififst
time, u hia wiie'H action in regard 10
the property, nud also that she had Ia
her possession 5000 In each, which he
had forwarded to her Plaintiff re-
muined with his wife about four
months only, having tcen driven
away by her uuwifoly conduct. Shu
rtfuaed 20 let HIM have any portion II
the 500, would not allow him 10 occupy
the same apartment, informed him
that the house and furniture were hers
ma that he had no business there. In
addition 20 this she called him disgust.
lug names Hnd rendered HE 90 un.
buarsble that he returned 10 Utah,
sun hoping her feeling toward him
would clango ho c0ltiuuui TO send
her further sums VI money from his
tRrninRR, tut all 10 no pa. pose. as she
hnd uniformly rejected all his pfOpo-
aitionF, anu he had now abandoned all
hope Of n reconciliation.
After hearing coffoborgtive teati-
mOuy the court granted the decree ~
prayed.
AGAINST TIE CITY.
On the motion ofAttOTuey Crllchlow
for the confirmation OF the report OF
Special Master MafrioneAux, the case
OF VIM. LangfJrd ct al W. salt Lake
CITY was then called up. CityAttorney
HOge appeared for the defendants.
Ghe suit was originally brought 10
obtain perpetual injunction restrain.
ing the city from pumping iis sewage
into the Jordan fiver, the sRmo having
been done TO hs detrimunt ot the
plaintiff anu some three hundred or
four hundred other persons residing In
the northern portion Of the city.
Damage 10 The extent OF $4,000 was
likewise claimed.
rho matter was referred by Judpo
Zaue 10 Attorney MaTriOnenuK, who,
ON May .otn, reported In favor Of the
plaintiff, without, however, awarding
damages. Nothing, said Mr.. Critch.
low, had yet been done 10 Abate the
nuisance, and he therefore now asked
that the report be- confirmed
ana decree entered ~ no.
cordanoe Herewith. The summer
was last reaching Its height and
the importance OF tue nuisance being
abated wa, evident.
Judge Zane asked how long the
argument IN this matter was now likely
to occupy.
Attorney Crilchlow thought about
fifteen minutes, but Judge Hoge
opined that II would take much longer
than that.
Amid the laughter Of those present
Attorney CritchlOw remarked-Well,
yes, understand that Judge Hope is
ready to talk until tue gravity sewer
II finishedl
City Attorney Hoge addressed the
court on the part OF the defendants, NJ
against the confirmation OF the report,
and sought 10 show that the facts In
this case, M to the nuisance, had been
considerably exaggerated. lie offered
10 arrange vita Mayor Bnskin 10 have
his honor Judge Zane driven over the
area In question II such were desired.
hitpihl AMI AloNAhhANholhs
p. b. Bonesleol vs.. w. IL. Falrchlli
OF al. Motion 10 set aside default Of
the defendant Fairchild opposed. Ten
days allowed to make showing by
AM iavit In support NJ thu motion.
Pettingill, administrator, Va the u.
3. Mutual Accident association. Mo. |
ton Of defendant 10 flo supuraedeas
bond. Taken under advisement.
Hiram YeRgor VI Emma y. Wood !
ruiz ct al. Hearing on motion for a
temporary restraining order was con.
linued TIL Saturday, the 22nd inst, ON |
application OF the defsndEnts' counsel. |
Ella Il. Dyer W. h, T.. Henderson Of |
nj. Hearing on demurrer continued |
til July 18th,
Eagle Foundry a Machine Company |
Va tho Chalk Creek Mining Company.
Demurrer withdrawn; twenty days al |
l0wed 10 answeL
Martha Turner Va Wells, Fargo & |
Go. and three other banks. Motion Of |
the inteTvonor for new trial argued |
aud submitted.
u. 3. Wind, Engine and Pumping
Go. Va Salt Lake Construction 90. |
Motion to modify 40 IA not to restrain |
the assignee %. Austin) frcm dispos.
Ing Of the property. The court limited
the Injunction to ten days.
Thomas BorlaSe Vi IL. M. Morgan