The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1893-10-26

| POSSESSION or opium. Appeal frOl
district court Of Honolulu. Davidso
for defendant.
: Prov. govt. vs.. Walter G.. Smith
libel. Hatch with the prosecution
Hartwell for defendant.
Prov. govt. vs.. Harry WEIGH; furi
Gus driving. Neumann for defendant
Prov. govt. VS.. j. NJ. Vivas and
NJ. Teixeira; libel. Neumann wit
the prosecution; Kinney for defend
ants.
Prov. govt. vs. Sylvester; assault
with dangerous weapon. kaulia TO
defendant.
libel. Creighton with the prosecu
ton; Hartwell for the defendant.
Prov. govt. VS.. Antoine Clogs; libel
Creighton with the prosecution; Kin
ney for defendant.
Prov. govt. VS.. Antoine Sylvia; gros
cheat. G. w. Ashford with the prose
cution; Kaulia for defendant.
Prov. govt. VS.. Domingos Comes
gross cheat. Carter & Carter with tn,
prosecution; G. w. Ashford for de
PENDANT.
Prov. govt. We. All Kau; unlawful
possession of opium. Appeal from
district court of Honolulu. Davidson
for defendant.
Prov. govt. VS.. All Kai; unlawful
possession of opium. Appeal from
district court of Honolulu. Kaulukou
for defendant.
Prov. govt. VS.. All Foo; unlawful
possession of opium. Appeal from
district court of Honolulu.
Prov. govt. VS.. Look Sang; unlaw-
full possession of opium. Appeal from
district court of Honolulu. Davidson
for defendant.
| ia.
violating section 8, act 81, Provisional
| government. Appeal from district
court of Honolulu. Kaulukou for de-
| PENDANTS.
Prov. govt. VS.. All Chang; keeping
disorderly house. Appeal from dis
trict court of Honolulu. Kaulukou
! for defendant.
Prov. govt. VS.. Geo. Lycurgus; keep
ing disorderly house. Appeal from
district court of Honolulu. Neumann-
Creighton for defendant.
Prov. govt. VS.. Wong Leong; un-
lawful possession of opium. Appeal
from district court of onolulu.
Peterson for defendant.
Prov. govt. VS.. VIM. Meyer alias Il.
Stone; violating section 2, chapter %,
penal code. Appeal from district
court of Honolulu. V. V. Ashford for
defendant.
Prov. govt. VS.. All Cheong; unlaw-
full possession of opium. Appeal from
district court of Honolulu.
Prov. govt. VS.. All Shea; liquor SELL
trict court of Honolulu. Davidson for
defendant.
Prov. govt. VS.. MOri; vagrancy. APP
peal from district court of Honolulu.
Kaulukou for defendant.
Prov. govt VS.. Ho Pal Yet and three
others; violating SETON :; &c. 81 Pro
visional government. Appeal from
district court of Honolulu. Achi for
defendants.
Prov. govt. VS.. Pong On and All
Kee; larceny Sd degree. Appeal from
for defendants.
Prov. govt. VS.. Yuen Shee and three
others; violating section 5, act 81,
Provisional government. Appeal from
district court of Honolulu. Davidson
for defendants
Prov. govt. VS.. r. C. Clark; violat-
section 5, act 81, Provisional govern
ment. Appeal from district court of
Honolulu. V. V. Ashford for defend
ant.
Prov. govt. VS.. Aiau; larceny Of ami
NAL. Appeal from district court of
Honolulu. c. w. Ashford for defend
ant.
Prov. govt. VS.. J. P. Bowen; lar
ceny 4th degree. Appeal from district
court of Honolulu. G.. w. Ashford
for defendant.
Prov. govt. VS.. ALI Sow; unlawful
possession of opium. Appeal from
district court of Honolulu. David |
son for defendant.
Prov. govt. VS.. Kai Ko; unlawful |
possession of opium. Appeal from |
n 4 ri Of |
for defendant.
Prov. govt. VS.. Afo; unlawful pos
session of opium. Appeal from dis
trict court of Koolaupoko. Kane for
Prov. govt. VS.. All Chew; keeping
tenement house without license. APP
peal from district court of Honolulu.
Carter & Carter for defendant.
Prov. govt. vs.. All Kwai; unlawful
district court of Honolulu. V. V.
Ashford for defendant.
HAWAIIAN JURY-CIvIL.
Manini Sylvia ct al. VS.. d. w. Ka-
luakai ct al; ejectment. Kaulia for
plaintiffs Kaulukou for defendants
Hawai- X. George VS.. Hanakaulani
Holt; ejectment. Hartwell for plain
iff; Rosa for defendant.
Maria kaanaana vs.. keaht ct ell.
,jectment. G. w. Ashford for plain
if; Magoon for defendants.
Kala and Annie Kumualii VS.. c. P.
aukea; ejectment. Magoon for
plaintiffs G.. Brown for defendant.
L. X. r. Amalu vs.. Kona Coffee &
Fruit Co.; assumpsit. Kinney for
Peterson-Rosa for defend
mt.
Clio II. Newton ct al. VS.. s. Kaale
t al. ejectment. Kinney for plain
ifs: Kane for defendants.
Mary Makaena ct al. VS.. Hawaiian
.ovt.: claim for road damages. Kin
ley for plaintiffs ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
or defendant.
MINED JURY.
Talula L. Hayselden vs.. Wahineaea
W.; ejectment. Ashford for plaintiff
Sawahi for defendant.
kanamu (w) vs.. c. b. Wilson, mar
hall; false imprisonment. Kaulu-
ou for plaintiffs Rosa for defendant.
HO Sun VS.. Kukekakaulani ct al.
jectment. Johnson for plaintiff;
lagoon for defendants.
H. A. Myhre VS.. A. Rosa covenant.
). w. Ashford for plaintiff; Creigh- !
On for defendant.
Joseph Tinker VS.. a. Rosa, execu-
or; assumpsit. Appeal from Judd,