New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1893-07-11
WATERPROOF
SPORTING OUTFITS.
H0DGMaN RUBBER COMPANY,
BROADWAY, ~ WEST 23p SIR
A BISHOPRIC FOX M'GLYNN!
ONE OF Ills FRIENDS INDICATES THE POS
SIBILITY
IT MAY PROVE TO BE A PHASE OF THE CoRM'
GAN-sATOLLI TROUBLE-THE BURTsELL

IT MAY PROVE TO BE A PHASE OF THE CoRM
GAN-sATOLII TRoUBLE-THE BrRTsELL
CASE AND BISHOP MQUAIDs DENIAL
Tie Rev. DR.. Edward McGlynn Is staying NJ tne
Pierrcpon House. in Brooklyn, but notice Is gwen ny
the clerk that he will see only intimate personal
friends One OF these who saw him yesterday was
the Rev John Barry, formerly OF 81. Peters Church'
and after he had him he Is reported to nave siu
that Dr. McGynn might be elevated to bshoprc
by the Papa Ablcgate. Dr. McGlynn refused 10 con-
firm or deny the assertion that he was preparing
statement for publication and said he would remain
in Brooklyn only short time. 1t Is thought that
he will make formal request to Bishop Mcdonnell
to be allowed TO exercise full priesty functions III
his diocese and II refused will carry the matter To
Monsgnor Satoll whom he will visit after his return
to Washington.
The possibility thus Indicated that Monsgnor
satoli may elevate DR.. McGynn 10 bshoprc puts
:, new phase upon tho Corrgan Satolll trouble III
that # shows the attitude which the Apostolic Dele
rato may take toward the former pastor OF 81.
stephens Church. DR.. McGynn has not been allowed
to say mass publicly since his restoration and ARCH
bishop Corrigan has failed TO appoint him TO rish'
thus partially multiplying the action of the Apostolic
Delegate In securing his restoration. Mohsishor
satoli would naturally come to the iurther support
OF Dr. McGlynn in order TO maintain the dignity Oh
his own commands. There was tendency, too last
night to connect the report OF DR.. McGlynns
possible bshopric with tho efforts lately maze Dy
opponents OF Archbishop COrrigan, to have the arc
diocese OF New York divided. and It's northern por
ton set aside as a separate diocese. Tho original
intent OF those who sought TO accomplish THIS was
10 ask for the appointment OF DR.. Butscll as bsnop
OF the new diocese. The great struggle now pre-
clpitatcd between the Archbishop and the Apostolic
Delegate over the restoration OF DIR. Burtsell to the
pnsolate OF the Church OF the Epiphany would seem
TO remove DR.. Burtscli from the field rs candidate
for bishop as he Is committed TO the efforts made
for his restoration TO the pastoratc, from wmch ne
WIS removed because Of his friendship for DR.. Nc
Glynn.
The failure the part Of Archbishop Corrgan 10
comply with the official request OK Monsignor oa'ohi
that DR.. Burtsell be restored 10 the Church oi the
Epiphany was sti the subject Of general discussion
among Catholics yesterday. The phase OF the sub
jcct that excited the most comment was the denial
that comes from Rochester, where Archbishop Cor
ngan IS tho guest OF Bishop McCuald. The Bishop
gives no opportunity OF TO his guest, with the
not strictly accurate remark that the Archbishop has
made It Il principle not to talk to newspaper men.
Bishop McQuaid himself, however, gave out this
statement concerning the reports OF the struggle
between the Archbishop and the Apostolic Delegate,
and OF the submission OF the 10 the propaganda
The Archbishop denies the truth OF the story In
every respect. 1t Is made up of whole cloth and has
no foundation Whatever
Mo Tribune has already printed the statement OF
Dr. uriscl In which he speaks OF the TACT that MOh.
,ignor satolli had sent MIN notice that ne ma, haa
and OF the subsequent determination TO submit inc
case 10 Rome. This conflict OF statement would
to reduce the discussion to Question OF yeraty
signor SatolU rs + becoming his high Office, has
yet said nothing publicly on the subject