Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1893-03-10

They Will Fight the Bill For All IL 10
Worth.

They VIII Fight the Bill For All Il 10
Worth.
The liquor men very much exercised over
the opinion Of Assistant Attorney Thomas on
the new liquor license bill. which Was published
in full in yesterdays STAR. and today the Die
trict building was crowded with a large number
Of those whose licenses have not been finally
disposed OF.
One OF the liquor men, who perhaps may he
classed as q representative. in speaking of the
bill to STAR reporter TODAY said: The bill. as
passed. is full of Inconsistencies. as is also the
opinion which printed in TIE STAR ves-
terday. l cannot understs nd how the attorney
can console himself with the idea that man
whose application for a license il pending
Is not entitled to be licensed under the old law.
Of course the case would be different IL a man
were to come in now for the prr-
pose OF evading the new law and file an appli-
cation under the old But this is not the case
with those applicants who filed their papers
in good faith before the new license bill
became a law. submit they are entitled 20
the same consideration those APP
plicants received who were fortunate enough
to have their license issue. There are several
cases where licenses have been withheld upon
Misunderstanding, and could cite Won cases
where the Commissioners were at fault in not
Issuing license which was correct in every
particular.
WILL FIGHT THE BILL
"Of course the liquor men are going to fight
this bill for all il is worth. They will not fight
it, however. with the idea Of defeating the Law
in toto, for all respectable liquor dealers
are law-abiding citizens and are in
favor OF rigid license law; but
under the present order Of things
| 1t would be folly for those who have rights in
tn NIT
viii not attempt TO enter into any argument
at this time upon the inconsistencies. of
the law. 1t would take too much time and
too much space in the columns of The STAR.
but this | will say, our legal talent assure US
| that there are many loophoes in the bill and
the courts will strsighten them out sooner or
| later"
The following is full list Of the pending ap-
| plications. together with the Commissioners
| action thereon:
RETAIL
Abraham l.. and Jno. NJ Eshleman, first re-
lection; Edwin c. Kirkwood. first rejection;
Thos. Morrisett. not acted upon: q. r. Parker.
not acted upon; VIM. Ryan. first rejection; Robt.
Weber, final reflections; J. o. Waters and VIM.
Jewels. not acted upon; Daniel Bride, first rejec-
| ton; t. Campbell. not acted upon; J. L. Clark
final rejection: NJ. Dougherty. not acted upon;
Chas. hllan, first reflections: Michl II. Lechy,
first rejection; Jno. VI. Perreard. first rejection
| Philip J. Roche. not acted upon: Jns J. Rae,
| not acted upon; Washington Jockey Club. not
/ acted upon; VIM. H. Rose. jr., first IT lection
Jno III. Shea, first rejection; Frank :. SI,ielkan.
not acted upon; Vim. W. Spilman, first rejection
! Albert Beymer. not acted upon; Robt. H. Brown,
not acted upon; Michl King, not acted upon
/ Daniel Bride, first rejection; Hugh BrosnRn,
| first rejection; Rosa VI. Baltz, first rejection
Martin Becker. first rejection; l. J. DAILY, first
rejection; Margaretha A. Endres. first rejection
| Martin Flaherty, first rejection: VIM ii. Fugitt
| final rejection: Fidler & Keller. first rejec.
ton; Myies Gibbons, final rejection; VIM. J.
Kerr, final rejection: J. IL. Jameson, first re-
| lection: L. A. Lucas. final rejection: Susan
Mcneil, final rejection; T. NJ. Pierce.
final rejection; John Shanahan, re-
jccted by two Commissioners and al
| lowed bv one, first reflections; Felix
| Shannon final rejection; James Lsvigne. fina
rejection; b. +. Shanks, final rejection: Patricl
d. Sullivan. final rejection, and W. 5. Wheeler
final rejection.
WHOLESALE.
benjamin Angel, final rejection; John d.
Daily Co., not acted upon; Charles Loome
first rejection; Joseph II. Bahlman, first rejec.
ton; Henry Beck, not acted upon; James III
| lection: James ID. Donnelly, first rejec-
ton; George E. Davis, first rejection
Fritz Ehringer, first rejection; DENIM.
+. Fealy, first rejection; Thomas Gray
| first rejection; Thos. III. Henshaw, first rejec.
ton; Thos. Kleh. first rejection; Jno. s. Hill
mon. first rejection; s. kaletzke and 7. Tude.
vitz. first rejection; Ellen c. McAllister first
rejection: Isaac Oppenheimer, first rejection;
Margt y Connor, first rejection; G. W. Pyles
& Bro, first rejection; Chas. Repp. fret re
lection; Ray d Craig, not acted
upon; Wesley Sullivan, not acted
upon; Ellen Sullivan, first rejection
Mary ]. Young. first rejection; Thomas J.
Crawford. not acted upon; Anthony Hanlon,
| jr., not acted upon; Dorothea Mccormick, NOT
acted upon: Frank A. Sullivan, not acted upon;
W. l.. Ceinar, final rejection; Eugene DAILY.
first rejection; Patrick Farrell. final rejection;
Martin Fitzpatrick, first rejection; George
Hammer, first rejection; Charles H. HUH,
final rejection; J. II. Lipphard. final rejection;
T. F. Maher, final rejection; Thos. Muntz. first
rejection; James ODonnell. first rejection: J.
{. ODonoghue, final rejection; Dennis o Brien,
fret rejection; Michael O'Donoghue. final re-
lection; Thomas Ruppert. final rejection, and
j. ID. Sullivan, first rejection.