The Valley Virginian. [volume] (Staunton, Va.) 1865-1895, 1893-03-30

pue sJr 40 GeIp!LI sA I.Wp8 s.ql!mS
I Jordan's heirs VS. Jordan's heirs-Decree
confirming com'rs report, making new
parties defendants and recommitting
1 cause to Com'r Hobbs.
| Commonwealth and Fudge, Sur. Par.
! SC VS. Stones admir- &c.- Decree con-
! iirming comrs report, and directing fur
ther sale of lands
Potts Valley Mining and Manufacture
ing Co. VS. Mary A. Riddlesbarger ct ais
Decree confirming com'rs report, and
directing disbursement of fund in cause
Alkaline Hall, by sc. VS. Austin Hall
Decree divorcing plaintiff from deft.
KYLE s. Thompson VS. j. c. Fennimore
ct als-Decree confirming com'rs report
of sale, giving judgment in favor OF
| plaintiff against defendant for balance
purchase money due, and retiring cause
| from docket.
Naomi L. IIobson, by sc VS. G. Column
bus Hobson-Decree divorcing plaintiff
from defendant.
National Valley Bank VS. Clifton Forge
Company-Decree committing cause to
! Com'r Hobbs.
J. F. Sach VS. Geo Swami &c.-Decree
confirming com'rs report of sale and di-
recting disbursement of fund in com'r
hands.
Willie Pritt VS. John E. Green and
| Thos j. Crizer-Decree referring cause
to Com'r Garrett.
Harness admir- ct ais VS. Peasants
admir- ct als-Decree retiring cause from
docket
Roche g. Co. VS. Gilmour, Henderson &
! Co.-Decree retiring cause from docket.
E. J. Vaughn ct ais VS. James Kendall
ct als-Decree confirming comrs report,
and directing sale of land.
A. E. Huddlestun w M. j. Bresendine
Decree confirming sale of lands and
directing collection and disbursement OF
purchase money.
7. j. Smith VS. Moses Humes' admir-
Decree referring cause to Com'r Garrett.
r. Taylor Gleaver VS. w. HI. Strough-
Decree confirming com'rs report OF sale,
and retiring cause from the docket.
j. G. Carpenter VS. w. Il. Hutcheson-
| Decree retiring cause from docket.
Delaney admir- VS. Scott ct ais Decree
referring cause to Com'r Garrett.
Fudge ct ais VS. Leighton ct ASIDE
cree confirming comrs report and direct
/ ing disbursement of fund.
| p Leterman VS. Ches. & Ohio Develop
ment Co ct als-decree directing sale of
lot a. block IS, West Clifton Forge.
| McAllister ct ais VS. Surber ct als-De
cree directing sale of land.
/ G. T. Lewis VS. West Clifton Forge Inns
provement Co.-Decree confirming COM
missiooer's report of sale, and directing
disbursement of purchase money.
Watts adm'x VS. Posey ct ais : Decree
directing conveyance of land and retir-
ing cause from docket.
Geo. A. Payne VS. A. s. Dinkle, &C.
| Decree of sale.
T. N. Jones VS. L. B. Jackson-Decree
confirming com'rs report of sale, direct
ing collection and disbursement of pur-
chase money, and referring cause to
Com'r Hobbs
( Dyer, Gidir VS. Giliispie ct als-Decree
| directing investment of of fund.
| HI. A. Taft VS. Clifton Forge Electric
| Light and Power Co. ct ais : Decree
awarding costs to plaintiff and retiring
cause from docket.
Engart ct ais VS. Boxley q Dunford-
Decree retiring cause from docket.
Woodward ct ais VS. Curry ct als-De-
cree confirming com'rs report and di
recting sale Of lot.
A merchant of this city conducted
business at one stand for seven years,
after which he moved his stock of goods
to store-room just two doors west of
his old place of business. At the end of
the eighth year he found that his profits
for that year were as great as for the
entire seven years that he was at the ola
stand, and without material incease in
his stock There seems to be something
in stand if not in a name.-Charlottes-
05lle Progress.
We will wager our Cleveland hat that
the former occupant of the room into
which the above mentioned business
man moved, advertised in the newspa-
pers. That will account for his remarks