The sun., 1893-06-21

! pure creation OF his brain and iInaRineu thh. M
the old man was about to deed ms "one " n''
N made great mountain Of The o fact st1asa thss
reas? hsa S'.f four AVE- r. ssDs S.l
sfwhlf f1aA % be sh'nss sssfeamSd: S5 .whv-oh, fatal
thing why dii sns stSp E9'PTf H tho "s @
| things on which he hung his case ne ne Ta,yeI nysr
fatal or vital and yet some OF them i,au S meyer
| been considered in any previous ois'u''''"
Ho iY intmated that some OF Lizzie Pc Bordeepss rieas
iS~ nosr v" Mrs Bowen. hor neighbor. because her
/ hsni tremh!cd when che took the oatn, IN, -,
his ssar pl' nocmnsS c y tGhhs her psh in bsns ths
murderesss sister, and ne said nc nad IT,. ds. ine
sTStS1 Tine 'S%"n ~hn RoasSn
Rd nSp hS %sn1 sG Sp to to Tfs shsm dey%s
ca1ss 9s,S q S the kindnsss Of her heart :, ,,s
Sso nnd Efnsfh h o. tnGss Es hS set rTSfs TSfs
R%SC xeIs lo 1 sss GE tie & "ssTs @ hc
totally unable TO understapd why thsy wsto re
! him felt certain that he was telling tho truth,
But The icroration dis ismissng mercy from
the hr.d and spirit Of Jury duty was "of'n' VI
i Mr. k4owtop, ,s stirred ,rrn the mnas o = tbs is
iir'thh In the e prisoners gI dock. -, r,,
Tales OF the martyrs IN tUs olh
colony rollod hack to the memory n s'e 70 The
seen. solitary in ,hn lnck Ms,eninE ;nsn,,e no e
ntions that were showered upon tho air
Of her guilt or nnosenes ; nee @oss %st
to and manner of thos" ancestors whose oi9ou ,ou
sept t As yen. all Gs M sSnS Ss
saw. saw m and said that he did not believe any one
The charge was deivered by Judge Dewey.
1t was absolutely fair. Of course, and YET the ne
second argument on Lizzie. Bnrden's behalf;
Hns Sefs Ss isovad Hd s i'ssSs sas %sns@ % @ S "
While tho presumption that the deiendant ls
mnssf6n mns 6S adHsa nRS ssf ss ths tvSaT H
necessary to prove n mGt'e. Mrs. ~ ttln"Tu ~ has
tcstmony hat the defondag ~ 'iG%S i T mes
claim Of premeditation. ion must not Lut On !.
any piece Of .vaencsn Grst MsEins tan tbs s
Weight 1t IS not t. magnify or sel.5tlsi ni
Mrs tfifrord. She is not rhilosophcr. halt.
yoan wSmn Ms5 Is wond thG heP. bs
ansat %nrdcT t. interpret thf. shs, msnn sSsv
evidence Of Emma Borden aud Bridget M Sni!L.
van 9 tro ron sae hn Justified in taxing into your
minds tho nnncertion that at the tune 9, me
| murder she had n hate OF hrr innthpr IL .,,nI
| is your conception. without being supported
| by the evidence. it Is a wrong nception. ,,,
| III you have such WRONG conception. IL VII WI,
| color nd control all the action OF your MINDS
untii YOU have correct ed your conclusion as to
rep t" sonsbio doubt The Court says rsas2nnhle
s"e1t suSn as may y he reasonably entertained:
The conviction must bsthat thsseis IL no 70 other
br al ron; enough to exclude all other reason
Y1iv are permitted to consider all the cir
! hIit must not Dnty ma tnlt tlC
guilt is probably proved. tut that ,b II is Il, mGTS @ralS
/ that the defendant was in the house you cannot
f not 'o2w SnSs to ss TAX ,Ss no}s Se
| Iiznia said her s'enmother got on the day OF
The murder. Judge Dewey NOT only made It
| new theory shout it. This is what he said:
Take the. question Of the note l, is charged ,,d
G"vernment reitcratcs this in it. close. The
writer has not been found nor the letter NOR
tho one who, brought til Has it been sulh-
wv hat is the answer Of the G9verrment to
s Of the ssesf to 'R %oua
Mixed Mrs Borden f NO was Ffsfs ssss pfs0I
sSch nsc Sfna Sttersnee. sA oud she not as We'll say
that Mrs borden had gone, on, instead l. Of te.
that no letter was found. Take it from her
suppose he endeayored to remove her from
the house in order to have chance to murder
M Esg es he he eer 80
AZ to hide the fact. Has the matter of this note
been clearly proved to youI covor,u.,+ -
person pe have done This deed. but her guilt is to
to commit the crime is not alone ere
suesti suti IN comes Where was the defendant when
TIE aged Eeoe we're killed +bo You are % to con, n
have had motive fer kilng a these s;zs
! and strength of the assailant. You must
ask is it reasonable that she could XII Mrs;
asn a%s And And then Then il Fl st
Killing of Mrs. Borden was. rot a part Of no
originr.I plan. you must see II that suggestion
The Government have called some gentle
men OF scientific standing called experts who
to COMMON knowIedce, and are allowed to to
pass judgment when others ,,. are not. Yet
'h"f "sI to S tie
as that q other witnesses. The "a, defendant die
If The to ] As h Ss Ss
"A defendant is an incompetent n wI,nsss nn;
here has made no such request. and thereors
she is incompetent to testify against herself.
defendant based on her failure to testify ia
wholly unwarranttd ., ,,,
fendant Is not required 10 clear it up. In a
certain sense dc!cndants are bound ny the
action OF their counsel in court. but not entirely
so in case Of the. accused. Now take her rela-
tons with the officers.
"Do you recall any time or place when she
made any objection to answering questions OF
, officers or TO their searching the house
statements Of prcsentiments and to. predic-
tiVns Of disaster. Should any different rule he
applied to this evidence than II It was con.
cerninG person not OF tho family2 You must
determine whether these expressions indi.
Gated forebodIng only or contein plation oil
crime Take the matter OF the dress. Can
you extract from the descriptions ot the
dresses such clearness that YOU could Identity
them
NO one imputes wrong motives to the wit
nesses. hut 1t was time OF confusion and M sH,
citemeHt, and 1t In tor you to determine
whether 1t has been identified. Take the state
mont OF Mrs. Reagan MS to the quarrel
! 1T Is for you to say whether you believe
such men as Mr.: ,IIolme. and Mr.. jubb would