Wheeling register. [volume] (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1878-1935, 1893-12-30

o0sgy JIG was the Impression OF VIII.
ness tnat there was third call, of the
se.'e nature. Mr. Reilly was not In the
once go any time. Later be met him
90 Dir Lambs There were three such
meetings there, at The first Of which
taere were suggestions as 20
WHAT THE WILL SHOULD CONTAIN;
the second was after the first draft was
made, and the third occasion was when
She viii. was sigaed. Mr.. Reilly was
always there when witness arrived, and
Witness did not see Mr. Gsilly's carriage
there on any occasion. The last meet
ing was on june IS, 1891, the second
tWo days before, ana the first two or
tnree days before that He remem-
oered that on the occasion Of one
meeting, Mr. Reilly SAT an the time on
q iootrest. He was Invited GO take a
chair but said he found the foot-rest
more comfortable. The Interview was
an hour-and-a-hall or two hours long.
Dir. Lamb advised as to the best meth
ods Of carrying out the provisionsot
the viii, and Mr. Reilly stated
MS desires He noticed nothing
unusual % Mr. Rolly's manner or
condition He was in good health,
,e for ,, illness could tell. Some
-,e.o-or]. 80 AIR. Reilly's wishes were
DreDared ~ the first meeting. Wtless
and Mr. lamb did not advise together
without Dir. RsiIly's taking part 20 10
When the wil was signed, ny. Kelly
went over 20 Mr.. Lambs desk and
signed IT, The first draft OF the will
rf enc 90
NShe .6fst and second interviews 40 'lr.
Lambs, and az the second meeting this
draft was taken 90 Mr. Lambs from
witness Office. 1ir Reilly was not
present when the FIRST drait was made,
It vas read 20 Mr. Reilly al
Mr. Lambs, aud 10 was then
discussed Mr.. Reilly made
A SUGGESTION FoE A CHANGE,
and MIR. Lamb made another. Both Of
these changes were made. Perhaps
witness made ono also. From these
suggestions another draft was made.
The last draft made OF ,Eo Will was tue
willat the time OF hts execution, ana Ar'
Reilly took &C. At tao second meeting
the draft was read portion at a time,
and some parts were read over again,
and explanations made and discussions
had. Witness cid not REGAL, thar any
one asked TO have portonsoi t-e oocu-
ment re-read. lie did not know THAT
either Mr. Lamb or SIR. Reilly called
for the re-reading OF passages. Ai-'
Reilly had asked witness 20 u1Ao .
draft az one OF the interviews iu !.IL-
of witness Office, and at lr. Lamo IS Do
was arranged between me three pres
ont thai witness was % make lle Lt~-.'
Witness did not know i-a' H.. L-,.o
had been requested 90 draw o Wl... no
copy of the lrst draft was lel5 "',A
Mr. Lamb or Mr. Reilly, ana no COPY
Of the second aralt was made. A- -.7
time the paper was executed Gr' N,,'-
ly's bodily condition was a'l f'SlI --7
rose from his seat W.-loV. ssS's-a.,9'
crossed the room ana Sd. Gown 90 quo
desk. lie made no el-'N.@-'J" Vt
plaint To the opinion oi WITNESS -A''
Reilly was
OF SOUND MIND.
.L....t. Mr. p,,uy f,llv nndsr-
800 "a erosr,s1 tbe contents OF the
Iii ..T tboT-,+ so 7 Maid particular
a..s,t,,- ~ ,bor feature
O-yvsve Al tbourbt ] ought 90. .
Witness said'the ideas OF Mr. Reilly
ONLY we're followed. The language was
q ferent being formal aud technical.
oSome phases in the will were iu Mr..
RsUIv's own words. but aside from them
7 na5e r,o olTort t9 rsDeat his language.
oDiv desired to get his ideas"
Do Won know how the trustees
were selected? Al only know Mr..
Reilly told mo OF them.
O-Did Won make any suggestions?
Nono. thew came from Mr. Reilly.
O-Do WON know where Mr. Reilly
80. s-o-, IN Mr. T.aml's2 A-No.
M -yor, l-rovy whore be went on
,osvi,r9 a No have mo racollsc-
tfo, ~ how, re- went ryyav. or where he
,-.-t 80 reoaI Who left first exc
.e,t tbotT have an impression that once
49, 6rst Mr. Reilly and did not
- ,o,otber ibid NOT sss his ear
ss@e Hfs recollection was that all
.bree meetings at NIr LAMBS we're iu
The evenings, but not after night fall. .
Perhaps about O'Clock. one meeting
may have been 10 toe uay t.Ae.
Q.-BeIore the execution OF tae wills
bad you any int.matlon that The eHecu- .
s0rs named iu it would acecep.' A
Atthe third Interview asked MT. KEN! /
If had seen the gentlemen, as / had re-
quested MIN % dose, ana DE answered ne /
bad had 0riei talk win one OF o'Sn OF
,nem' and tnolSn, l-eis "oI.o Io -'
1imculty ABOUT i~ anu e'.-ol 91-,
gesteQor he su2se>teI tnat .IeJ uaI
UeFer see ore. Il le" Gays altet 'ae
s,ncutl0n OF the VIII, rather SULLIVAN /
1no Bishop haln' called aI my Once
ana we went anu saw AI. Ate-tt1 Z