Washington standard. [volume] (Olympia, Wash. Territory) 1860-1921, 1893-01-06

' ''"f'
r...,,, o.,... a..,u.,...
...'.'
''''' F''f
~ 80"
......
t' Hf
.... ... ..... .......l..
..... .t..Ha. ..I..
'''
'' 'a'''
'''"
49,. '"''''
lin ,....t', ~ '''' we W.
-, 80, '''' '''l i''i' ''''''' '''i
NV,
.l. '''
,..,,..,,,......,.','t '- w. '
-. ''''
...,, l''l"'"'" ~
t.n.r,,.i ..n,,. Wv l''l"'2 " v"
.,..,1', 49, ~, ~. 49, we '''',
49, -, - 80 :" w ''"''' p,
'.,,i.. -" :, " "''"'' ""'
.I No., ,,.,, 80 ~ ~ w .''"
,'I Wv So ~ ','''''
,,,',i w ~ -'''' y" u" '','f
80 ~ "'',' ''l'''""''
-, 49, -" ~ ,'I"''' "''"'hk
sn., w., ,.... 49," ""''' ~ ''"S"n ~
49, ".l l,','.''',''s y "'-' I'"''''-
'"". "n, nm, any ''P'h-'' 90 cost
va. - ,., ''' ~, ""s' ''," ",-e'''' on
wy ''"I, ~, wv ' "'''o'", ~ '''' rN
p"''' r,'''' "'S'"'' ,l'h upon tue
I",u anus "'',, , ,lall aN' ptrce
'""', VI M "'n,t Heh'' ana winch
nm, ,'"y w 'u ,r''. III accordance win
we i,o''s nom VI '.'e Goa" OF clNi' pro-
oo"'''e' osi" SUIT Shaii he IN the
n'"'" VI '''c Guy rs painful anu
.'a, tPon Tue hiing OF complaint
~ Tue superior court I" enforce a lien
" any Kun" ncreoh' tue piaihtiii shsiI
DC eh'itIed !, recovery Is had
10 inc'"ae Us costs 'ho sum OF
'"on'y'h'e dollars a. attorneys fees
WINE .he power 10 make the i'm
proveinent AT the expense OF the
aou''ng properly is mus conferred
upon the council the char'er doe" not
unuet'ake 10 specify the manner III
which II IL 10 be exercised save a.
above set out. The ordinance under
consideration IN this case, which il is
cia',heu authorizes lien upon de
remnants property Is numbered 40,
anu WAS passed oy the plaintii, City,
FEBRUARY = 1911.
oection Oh TINS ordnance provides
that whenever the City Council
oy resolution shall
oruer any WORK or improvement to be
uone upon any OF the streets
I" snail % the DUTY OF the CITY Engi-
heer 70 make plans and specifications
Oh .he ~ork 80 ordered ana an esii-
maze OF the cost and lille
the same III ms Office.
onder section = the street
wnere such WORK or Improvement
- oIoeIou 70 DC done, snail constitute
an assessment district, and
al properly ironnng thereon and Tor a
distance OF W ieet back
snail DC assessed Tor the full debt
,'nereo,, IN proportion 10 the benefits
upon the properly 70 90 oenehted sui.
ncieat 10 cover the total expense OF
the WORK 70 the center OF the street on
wnich II ironts
ny section 3it 10 the Clerks duty
"ishih nVe Gays aiter the council has
oroereo any WORK 70 oe done or I'M
provemene 70 De made list OF all
iots or parts OF lois fronting upon the
proposed WORK or improvement, to
gether Win the name OF the owners
tnereof' and deliver such list to the
City assessor.
oection 4 requires the Assessor to
take such i'st and the amount deter
mned by the council as the full debt
ior soch improvement, and personally
view the premises and assess the same
on the iots or parts OF lots fronting or
eoutting on sucn improvement 90 Or
dereo' IN proportion 70 the benefits
upon the property 70 be benefited.
sumcient 70 cover tho iuil debt thereof
as ORDERED oy the City Council i
ana return the same (duiy certified)
10 the CITY CLERK within five days.
oecuon PROVIDES that the City
Councii snail, a. It's next regular meet
ing tnefeaIter py feso!uton i
connrm, mcol!y or recnly SAID assess
men', or re!ec. sne same IN "nole or
III Psft' anu may make sucn assess |
ment az may seem light and proper |
In the premises which as
'essment snail DC nnai. l.
IL Is claimed oy DEFENDANTS counsel,
anu conceoeo oy counsei ior the city,
'nst no notlce was ever gwen deiend'
anus OF the proposed Improvement Tor
WI TINS assessment was LEVIED.
nat no opportunity was ever gwen
u6I6uO8ut3 W DC Oc0TO before the