The sun., 1893-01-08

sereesbiy affecting both Of these prslstes.
II was even asked. not once. but many times:
Who. and what is this Satoilip"
A pamphlet written iu Italian and tran lnted
into English was circuiated-at at fret secretly.
but afterward openly-in New York, contain
ing staten ents which. II true. we're deeply
damaging to Archbishop ireland. and. II false.
Ms5s sos eonsody uatsSe auho
Whsp Dr. McGlynn wac restored by Mgr
sntollfs few days ago to his priestly functions
the storm Of indignation reached It's climax
anS nS eseeSi.s ssi sfsffN New M gave ciFsuaton
does bearing with no. light. touch upon Arch
bishop Ireland and Archbishop satolii Lett
s Of this seTs might ea SsSe
then several condolences Among others:
Letter. yery ns'.y s,y ia sns ssn
pr =, a q
.sm.n ra' .ss sSqsa 9h 1SI ni es
matter And OF no,
Cstboiics to the secular press.
Upon such evidence as this the friends Of
logically. arrived at the conclusion that the
Archbishop Of 81 Paul and Mgr. Satolii. the
papai A6legate were the targets %
xrs6sishoP iEeiand's friends; though , thus 4,
their Wow. mounted virtually to a conspiracy
Of Roman Catholic priests. had @ no complete
Seeoi have eontinued % Indefinitely in state Of inde.
cision but for the interposition OF the Chicago
Synaay pOst And the eircnmstHhnees 6t th sh, which
partisan concern in any quarrel between the
bishops Of any commnnion. and who's, whose Inter
character as a citizen. to interpose. may rs
well be stated here.
Within the past, fortnight a Roman Catholic
IL nj cit ah vii
Archbishop ,Corrigan. received from the latter
remarkable note + was written nc, on ,n card
""N 45c MADISON AVE-. NEw YORK.
Ir,rat.
Ny DEAN sini A friend of mine wishes to publish in
the West article the school question which he
to read 10 next Monday evening. lhnve suggested
tho 80 as n good medium Of publicity and would
thank you to that tho article is published, as
sure In advance that the authors views arc worth
listening to.
A friend of mine. Bishop. has called my attention
article the ;tiilw aer affair." which appeared
in the thoago Herald last october September Could
you hunt It NJ for ne'
with best Christmas wishes. I am, very faithfully.
yours. N. A CoRHcAa
BY post few days later the lsyman received
New York the article referrel to in this
marx mark uron i except the post%ask 70 dssIose d Sc
is sha"SF Or T5es The ar.ce was
hut the layman. having Archbishop Corrigan's
note still in his pocket. put this and that
the article" which Archn,ishop CorriGan
las received no further comm un cation from I'M
his Grace OF New York. the layman has suffered
this idea to become in his mind a settled con-
expressed the desire that his article" should
be printed in certain journal Whose name
the other perfect fidelity Of the fac-simile
printed herewith; the layman intrust.d the
sG tht
bishop CorriEan'S. '.a-,!cle", will be found in
dation. The original manuscript has not been
destroyed. and may still be examined by per
sons showing reasoneb Bile claims to that privi-
Even the most cursory examination will
show that this article is remarkable product
Archbishop Corrigan. 1t is chiefly made up OF
excerpts from the famous memorial of ,Arch-
published. perhaps. IL for no other reason. be.
cause the authority to publish it belongs Tor
ss9sf rs SsSs A R oTs
or his aaTMthorized Az agent. ana archbishop Ire
to give distinction to the article. it IL not the
only circumstance witch cmlnpels adm
delphia "eccie.iastic" holding an animated
a End apparently harmonious inquest on Arch
70 the disadvantage Of MGR. Irsiaud's repnta-
to his colleagues. and his loyalty to the Ro-
man MAJ CATHOLIC Shurch. ~ u word. the "srti.
ing Of n. philadelphia ecclesiastic." Though
the article" is reproduced in full in another
its concluding sentences. which will illustrate
the spirit Of the paper WHICH Archbishop Cor
Chicago to have printed anonymo1siy In a
say decidedly" the Philadelphia :. .ecclesi-
)ish Catholics may haye been driven to accept
= atreachsrous anti Catholic, unrepublican sys-
such q system and the he wholo European A Con. ON
system. including Prussia and Italy. but
TEN. and Archbishop. Ireland rannot force it
upon US. Mgr. ,ss:olli. when lie has been here
Archbis hop Ireland then what tell you now"
r, The Snnaag t9st is not the organ Of any
bishop CorriganS article 1t reserved the right
Of an unbiased newspaper 10 discover il
Uorrigan had presented at length and with no
iitis idd skill h,s sid. Of IN o.y,ously two.
Especially to the truth loving p,,lic. rec reauiGad
that Archbishop lrellnd should have In op-
portunity to give hts side ns well. The Arch
bishop 81 81. Paul CHANGED to be in Chicago
early In the week. and il was an ensy las well
as right-ou matter 10 submit the Corrigun
document to him. But it was quite another
matter to procure from Mgr. Ireland the reply
Which % newspaner Justice seemed to odemand.
Bile tu the laws Of newspaper Justice. Tho
document was left, Mt his room in the Grand
Pacillc Hotel. and he may. my. he must. have
read it. But he declined outright to give TO
the press categorical or any other reply to
TIE .arguments; .ccusations. " insinuations
arnnymous Philadelphin ecclesiastlr.
Thrown ny the srruples OF an Archbishop
upon its own resources the sunday Posi- was
NOT slow to make some interesting discoveries
on its own account. 1t would he tedious here
to set down all the lines Of inquiry to which
an honest land it ia hoped. heneticentl desire
for truth led the Iepr.sentatiy,r Of this Jour
Corrigan's "Philadel phia article" was speed
lily found to be magnet attracting 10 itself n
considersb BILE mass ~ other documentary anil
verbal evidence bearing upon the same case
whom tha Archbishop OF New York had hon
only koman Catholic citizen OF Chicago whom
1t hnd been deemed desirable to enlist in the
anti Ireland propaganda, Representatives of
this journal found very little troubls in gain
tor tbx. Of nraI