The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1893-09-03
PUSH THE REPEAL BILL.


-
j nR TooRHEzs <rxoUNCEs Hrs Pro
eRANME I'M TEE sEN<1E
- NE Says He VIII Ask on Monday 60 Have
. the Daily Hour or naeeti,e Fixed nc IL a.
~. Instead Of n, and Ipdiontes Hts De-
terr.instior to Pres. the Repeal Bill 20
Vote with Little Delay ss Po""ibie-A
Diseussion or the Chinsse Exclusion Act
oppo-itie- IN che House to the fN"'e'
Copied Eros, the Ton Reed Congress-
WASHINGTON. Sept 2.-Ths routine business
Of the Senate to- day having all been disposed
4 OF at 1915 Mr.. Voorhees, Dem. Ind rose ana
q said; IT ask that the order OF business be
temporarily set. aside mot losing Its place. In
order that the Senator from Oregon Uni. Delphi
may proceed with remarks which he desired
to make on another subject. DO this the
more readily when reflect that the repeal bill
has been before the Senate only three days
really-it was reported on Tuesday and print
ed on "Wednesday. This 10 the last day OF the
week Next week will open the era OF real
business. thrust that we will mako progress
b from bonr to hour. / feel warranted to-day.
inasmueh as l am not advised that any Soma
tor desires to speak on the bill to-day. to take
. the course which Indicate After the Senator
from Oregon shall have finished his remarks
shall be very glad II other Senators will DO
ready to 20 on. II not will indicate at the
time what desire"
Mr.. Hale tRep. Me.tIn view Of what the
Senator from Indiana has said as to next week
being u business week. l suggest to him
whether It would not DO advisable. either on
Monday or Tuesday. for the Senate to come
together at IL o'clock instead OF II There are
no committees at work. and time may as we'll
be spent here as elsewhere. / know that
ss4he Senator has represented himself Is be-
Ing very DESTROYS Of putting forward the
debate II we meet at IL, there can be BY or
8 o'clock. instead OF one speech. two or three
speeches
MIR. Voorhees-I give notice now that on
Monday / will ask to take the sense Of the
Senate on the question OF meeting at IL o'clock.
! give that notice now SO that Senators may
consider the matter have an old fashioned
idea OF the will OF the majority being carried
out do not expect to control matters except
through a majority Of the Senate. and give
notice now that on Monday will ask tho Sem
ate to consider the propriety Of meeting at IL
O'clock from Tuesday on. and proceeding with
the business before Va.
The repeal bill was then laid aside in
The, House Urgent Deficiency bill was re-
to the 18th Of April last
THE CHINESE EXCLUSION ACT.
Mr.. Dolph then addressed the Senate In adj
% Of iii to sSaSs ss
as ss to ssa st the
rsdica on the, Chinese aues tiSn; BUT but he
'Gs'st
shsoa @' II. he o. to
Enumeration.
ssn..I and Said Xxi IL s$
self was more responsible for that provision
hsH tf ss%. s sh5
SeI to
saryi hs said e the law we're to % executed
t that the PsSs o HE
hsa vote hsa e q d
ssns %Ee as.r.s % 50
no one need ;fsar that the Chinese Govern.
n msnt wG pSa c rstsiats upon americans in
"a:
would rt se the
sa with the dsatS the ssses
however. tho ,, Chtnsss doysrnmsnt should
say that the SIX Com Danies had prevented
Chinese lanorers from registering. promise
ask an extension Of time. there would 10 no
,nsuperable objection 70 the granting Of
pose Of the law. but was to be simply PEN
Atty. the granting Of further time would not be
incompatible with the general purpose OF
Mr.. White Dem. Call remarked sarcastic
badly trea ed in the Senate. In the TACT that his
ham me-, had not been engra ted on the Gearyact.
thing definite in regard to the history 1" Of TIE
Goary act. but no did know that the best fea:
asi came from the House; He, had heard that
encel co n mittee drawn up the present regis
tratlon clause. but he was not the father OF tho
S Hoase bi Ms I'M
CURED with the senator from Oregon as to the
@ the
cary i 9nt sh H be @ made At once
act and i the regis eIsnse In it, TSers
was nothing in the act. he said, either cruel or
atedthe siightest objection on the part OF the |
Chinese en- as government. The na,ion which could
not n clear Its borders Of hostie and allen Gle.
and rights. And so all Govern ments had pro.
s sh how ana under what conditions aliens |
Sr Iy force i they dsciined d" to iesye. n The
the treaty with China. 4 Legislative abroaa!ion
OF treaty was not a violation OF u treaty. The
violation OF a treaty carried with 1t an impllca-
ton OF misconduct by the Government violat-
Ing Il but the abrogaton Of u treaty carried
with 1t no such inference.
with Mr.. Teller as to the impolf.y OF encour-
aging thinese immigration. but he had a |
very decided opinion as to some OF the recent
legislation on tho subject being violation OF
the phghted faith OF the nation. and violation
OF such character as had been entirely un-
neressury.s lls did not believe that this great
country could violate its treaty obligations
wantonly and ruthlessly without resultant
evil to the country itself There was a way
snda mode by which the United States could
the matter. He believed that there never had
besn any time. while the recent Chinese
when the United States could not have OBJ
ttalned by Diplomacy a mod hcation Of the
treaty; and have accomplished all that It was
sought to accomplish. II that we're so, 1t was
certainly a duty due to national self-respect to
ths result
Mr. Mitchell lRep.. Or asked Mr. Gray how