The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1893-02-24
The Court Record.
SUPREME COURT.

&.
E. d. I. II. Railroad Company. Greene c. c.
Reversed. Odds. Jan action brought by an
administrator for the death of his decedent un-
der Sec. 2S4, *. ;. 1881, IS under the exclusive
control OF such administrator, and it cannot be
compromised or controlled by the beneficiaries
under tho statute.
I6O7O. Patrick O'Brien ct al vs.. Patrick
Moffett ct al Huntington C. c. Affirmed.
Hackney J.-One made party to a suit to fore
close mortgage when 1t Is alleged that he
claims some interest In the property, and the re-
lief sought against him is to fOreclose his equity
of redemption. il he have such an interest. he is
required thereby to assert his interest and fail
ing to do SO he is precluded by the Judgment and
DEGREES OF foreclosure against IL.
1868. Jacob Eckert ct al. va. Charles G.
ard, ia motion III arrest OF judgment cuts off
the right to motion for u new trial. except only
where the grounds OF the motion for a new trial
are unknown at the time the motion in arrest is
made. =. An answer OF former adjudication
occurring after the trial and Judgment below re-
curing evidence to support it is not properly
When reversal by this court. such answer
showing judgment by proper court between
the parties for the same matters is good.
16505. BAIL LedgerwOOd Vs. State. Davless
c. c. Affirmed. McCabe, 1.-THE statute r. 8.
1881, Section 1927 as amended by the act Of
March 8, 1891, concerning arson, is valid and in
force. Section 237, X. s. 1881, as adopted in
1852, is in force and was intended to get rid of
common law onenses i'm this state and there are
no common law offenses in Indiana. 9. Delay
Of the court to render judgment after the plea
of guilty does not defeat jurisdiction of the court
-.
tense Of former jeopardy.
1924. State VS.. Isaac Hopper. Harrison
@. C.. Rehearing denied.
1869. Joseph j. Doan ct al, Executors VS..
Andrew E. Dow. Hendricks @. c. Transferred.
SUPERIOR COURT.
Poem I-Hon. Napoleon B. TAYLOR. Judge.
Abraham +. Croft We. Nathan b. Croft; notes.
Judgment by confession for PLAINTIFF for ss46.O6.
City of Indianapolis vs.. Samuel W. Patterson
ct al; to quiet title On trial by court.
Room 2-HOn James w Harpsr JudQa
Rein Hammond vs. Otto n. Roy ct al; suit to
collect rent on a lease. Jury out.
Room S-Hon. Piiny w. Bartholomew. Judge.
Charles f. Robbins, Administrator, vs. Citi
zens Street-ralroad Company; TO set aside trans
fer of stock. On trial by court.
Abraham F. Croft VS.. John c. Croft; note.
Judgment for $114.OS.
Neic S,rts Flied.
John II. Wagner VS.. Francis W. Douglass; note.
Alice Caldwell VS.. Ella Bass; SANDER; demand,
$1,000 Room 3.
Martin Ccnarroe ct al; VS.. l. w. Akers ct al;
mechanics lien. Room 2.
The sinker-Davis Company vs. Frederick B.
Comstock; on account and mechanics lien.
Bridget Tarpey VS.. Elizabeth Mahoney; spe-
citc performance and damages. Room 2.
Alvin HI. whited VS.. j. w. Coleman; restrain
ing order. Room B.
George Kothe Alexander Keeper ct al;
foreclosure mortgage. Room 3.
John ]. Cooper let al VS. Christian I. Lout:
u
Maggie Mcdonald VS.. Martin McDonaId di-
v0roe. Room 3.
Maud NJ. Jones vs.. Albert III. Jones; divorce.
Room 2.
CIRCUIT COURT.
Hon. Edgar A. Brown. Judge.
Pauline c. Webbing VS.. Samuel Eichberg ct al;
to quiet title. Finding for plaintiff and title
quieted in her.
Georgia Ann wilkins VS.. Nathaniel A. Hyde
ct al. Board OF Childrens' Guardiansl Libel.
Demurrer to complaint sustained and Judgment
on demurrer againt plaintiff for costs.
Joseph Milgan W. Charles Orme et al; fore
closure. Judgment in favor of plaintiff for 81,
445.76 and decree of foreclosure.
Thomas Young, ST., ct al. VS.. Thomas Young,
jr., ct al; contest of will. On trial by jury.
Ne,v Suits Filed.
Walter A. Wood Moving and Reaping Machine
Company VS.. the Indiana Insurance Company;
damages. Demand 81 900.
Walter A. Wood Moving Machine and Reaping
Company va. the Vernon Insurance and Trust
Company; damages. Demand $1,000
CRIMINAL COURT.
Hon. Willard &. Cox. Jui2.
State vs.. James Kinney; robbery. Trial by
jury. Jury out.
state VS.. Henry Messenger; robbery Trial by
court; not concluded and continued until Satur-
day.
State VS.. John Edison and Edward Sands;
burglary. grand larceny and receiving stolen
goods. On trial by court.