Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1893-01-20
Chief Justice zaie Decides in Re-
gard 10 the Alexander Residence.
THE RECEIVER GAINS HIS POINT.


o, the entire residence OF the AleSan.
der family on Main street, between
Third and Fourth South. His honor
now ordered the surrender OF the
property In question to the receiver, but
a stly of ten days was granted to Mrs.
Julia Alexander TO make her arrange
mentS for the future.
The writ OF assistance was Issued.
GENERAL ORDERS.
George NJ. Scott Il Co. VS.. Frank
Muutoe. THIS appeal was dismissed.
James T.. Paine OF al. vs.. the Sal.
Lake Mill n Elevator company. The
oemurrer IN this case was with drawn
by the defendant.
Martha Ann Coombes W.. the Salt
Lake and Fort Douglas Railway com.
Iany. ID ,mutror sustained and leave
gwen to answer In ten days.
samuel +. Spencer vs.. Jas. q. Me-
Allister ct vi. Demurrer 70 compla mt
submit ted.
Utah Title, Insurance a Trust com.
pany W.. John a. 6ro.sbeck et al.
demurrer TO amended complaint suH.
alned anu cave given 10 amend In
five days. Demurrer TO Intervention
withdrawn; ten days TO answer.
Mason q Co. w. w. II. Whitney ct
Al. Demurrer to com plaint withurawn;
twenty days 10 tswer.
Godbe-Pitts Drug Co. VA. John w.
shet,le. Motion to strike out answer
sustained; ten days TO amend,
W. ii. Remington ct al. Va John IL.
Weber ut al. Demurrer to complaint
oyeffuled; eleven days TO answer.
Five days granted to amend com.
plalnt.
Alfred Peterson Va. the Central
II tel Co. Demurrer 10 comp amt
Withdrawn; thirty days to answer.
Salt Lake Building and Manufac.
turing Co. va. Il. Richards. Demurrer
to answer overruled; twenty days
all-wei to plead.
The People Vi. y. ). Noblitt ct al.
Demurrer to complaint oyerfuled;
twenty days TO answer.
Max Idlemsnn 1t al. va. John Il.
Kslly ct al. Judgment as prayed, by
default.
Kansas City Hardware 90. vs..
1900
NY s ~ ~, new u'aI.
.. s a. , ., se' ,,,s c .ono, leoiv.sal
s,4i, ~ s''y, "uu uein W
m hs Ac..on " 'no sIanu Jury.
ins aevosou was reIeaseu from eus'ouy
."m iocos I'atnns.
o'''' "'jou'"eu III ~ III
IN TIE OTHER COURT.
lat. pA a., a
o,,s,,eor, 49, SUI :" ,no oup,eue
80 ~, a., a,,,'i.., ~ '''unou
-" wv 'f"'' e"''nu"''
FOR TIE DEFENDANTS.
%. EuaI,. ~ p W M. ~, rIose et ~,
$1,000 49,, . uen ss ~, rupnIi,,eu
ysy '"o .ou.t now iouhu Tor the
MI w. aas,.t wa au ac.ioh 70 quiet
""s w 0'i'"'n reA' es'a'e In TINS CITY,
DISMISSED.
Jo,n II
Rs'i,nsd aa,.. w. T Iue onion Iaclnc
,o,n...a evnpany. ne P"in'iuh ht-
sn,t ,ha "n"iawn rom tnls
,isn,.,' ~, ,tiS'',', 9uou''.'cu Ut
tbs 80, ai,n,, VII" eos's' "hich
"'''"su'
THE MALQUisT DIVORCE CASE.
TIL. dt,... .,,,. , -,
onist ,s ~. r"' VI hnna ~ hai.
S Soii.a ~. ' , 4. Malqulst was next
,o,, ~ Viu,, 'uuge fowefs anu At
,In ~, q; mcCal'nm appearing Tor
Dl Ts' 'or .ne defendant;
,,ann .oupinint was BASED on the
,nsn ~, =, ."iute 10 ptoVlue LOT more
SAINTS, a '.., yeafs past anu alleged
M. III, ~un ono commune Jacooson.
con,i a, ,,' aisD ptays ior an order OF
ofm. ' "ns apart 70 her such portion
M ~ uon,hoh property OF the parties
Tho ga,. uo eIuI'Aoie, auu epJoininB
nj hi' ,'.n toui encuhoetiny any
IN popvI!, Iuf'ner, requiring MIN
con-, suun sum as aimony as the
ia ay ueeH lus,.
pnnishada NAN ,ac's IN the case We're
nI,n" nc IA 'hese co,u nus upon the
ms,s,s ,no suit. me parties inter-
Jnna ,e-o !" oopenhagen, sweden, In
her hn ~, "nl plninui alleges that
bssn "tu ,,,,, since tue year 1871, has
Jacabson W a,ui'ery with Johanna
yssss saee., in lhis CITY; For thirteen
,,nan ias' ne mas compeiiei her to live
apYn,a Wy una,lty oil ireinds, though
avsr. 'hay hoie 70 support her. Shc
neouirsa ., no ~ worm ABOUT $4,000,
t To ,s,n am since the marriage, and able