The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1893-02-19

from Feb. q to March 10 inclusive, as
follows:
MONDAY, FEB. d.
Louis Brown, ct al, VS.. E. II. Parsons.
J. L. Clark VS.. Hesekia P. Mason, ct al.
E. G. Woolley, ct al, VS.. Fish Broth
ers Wagon company.
Joseph Baumgarten VS.. Frank Hoffman.
TUESDAY, FEB. Is.
James Fairclough VS.. Salt Lake city.
John Anderson, ct al, vs.. Charles
Klambeck, ct al.
A. F. Edwards VS.. w. F. Heaps, ct al.
WEDNESDAY, MARCH L.
Joseph NJ. Thompson VS.. The Salt Lake
Rapid Transit company.
Caroline Anderson VS.. Solomon Han
cock.
John A. Fritsch VS.. Frank Miller.
THURSDAY, MARCH ?.
W.. M. Burns VS.. Edmund Wilkes.
J. j. Gleason VS.. w. A. Smith
Jack Bolton VS.. George Naylor.
MONDAY, MARCH 6.
Palmer & Rey VS.. James H. Wallis etal.
Frederick Collins VS.. Salt Lake ORA
E. @. Coffin Hardware company VS.. j..
B. Watts ct al.
TUESDAY, MARCH z.
Boyd Park VS.. e. H. Parsons ct al.
Hudson Furniture company VS.. Freed
Furniture company.
Westinghouse Air Brake company VS..
the Salt Lake & Fort Douglas Railway
company.
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 8.
John Robinson VS.. the Oregon Short
Line & Utah Northern Railway company.
William E.. Smedley VS.. Henry Dem
halter ct al.
Alexander S. Fowler VS.. the Union Pa
citic Railway company.
THURSDAY, MARCH 9.
Beck & Pauh Lithograph company VS..
the Natural Mineral Water company.
Hudson Smith VS.. Hyrum P. Folsom ct
al.
George Naylor vs.. the Mountain Stone
company ct al.
FRIDAY, MARCH 10.
William NJ. Free vs.. William ]. Halo
ran.
Utah Central Railway company VS.. ST.
mon Bamberger ct al.
A. G.. Bast VS.. Andrew G. Burt ct al.
BEFORE JUDGE ZANE.
Ezra Thompson VS.. David Keith ct al. !;
settlement OF statement on motion for a
new trial; set for Feb %.
G. w. Seavey vs.. r. Mcintosh ct al. (;
twenty days allowed in which to settle
statement on motion for new trial.
III. Pembroke VS.. o. II. briggs ct al,
leave given to substitute administrator
for deceased defendant.
Robert S. Hamilton vs.. II. V. Otto ct
al; leave to file amended complaint
given.
BEFORE JUDGE BARTCH.
Sarah Kahn vs.. Robert T. Burton, jr. /,
ct al; default of defendants entered and
decree of foreclosure granted in favor
of the plaintiff with 5000 as attorney S
fee.
A. n. Butts VS.. Henry 9. Pierce ct al. ;
judgment entered in favor OF plaintiff.
Gallagher vs.. the Yosemite Mining
company; set for trial on March 3.
NJ. Levy VS.. George Particle ct al; mo-
ton to dissolve attachment continued
until February u.
M. j. Weeks vs.. L. G. Hardy; contin-
ued until February 81.
J. D. Smith ct al. VS.. A. f. SipDerly ct
al; ordered to show cause why receiver
should not pay over funds set Tor Feb
ruary 81.
]. F. Belding vs.. E. Mehesy; hearing
on report OF referee set for February 20.
Beck VS.. McHugh ct al. clerk ordered
to apply funds in his hands to payment OF
judgment, less the clerks and reporter
fee.
Hector W. Haight VS.. G. E. Pearson
set for hearing on Feb. q, subject to OBJ
lection of the plaintiff.
William Perrgo VS.. W. II. Dodge ct al,
referred to Judge Zane for setting on mo-
ton for an injunction.
TX. Burnham ct al. VS.. D. Alexander
ct al; leave granted w. FL. Hasstmann tc
intervene.
David Pearl VS.. j. W. Whitehead; stay
OF proceedings granted until security fol
costs is filed.
Jacob Holt VS.. Charles E. Pearson
Judgment in favor OF the plaintiff fol
81, 1892.