The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1893-07-16

Ti ANY s sllS' to Mr. Gn
,snf 9b na .nps this and rsaR ras sSa
!sns T s.atemsn. Or d sonsis,Sn. with
the story told in the ALLEGED nd pi Mitb the
concerning a blue dress and an ahprosheh nrrl
that. according both to the plaintiff and ne, her
counsel she was living u lively Gxpee ,an.icd
If nfh N Or tSass ana$! ne
name. Of wilfred Murray, and i%modiiattslSS
Rre sR %scEs from fas
would bring us. according. IL the alpapse.
sbo lot s tho 2 20 learn DG
wRsthsir You you find f i" this alleged Diary,
% alleged Meg ns sp ths nsm %a d weS &y
TO virginia Water on the N December, ISL S..
alleged expectation. entertained on tho 2Sts,
November and conndei to the woman called called
man Of 9nSlshceg i You lind nothing which
moro. you find nothing in the nature ovon,
OF a remots allusion. to the obvious and
pcctatiop. must you not think this. also rather
remarkable As a matter Of I, fact ! w have
IN T MY lien e and ON on The 7th Of Dccepcr 1887
| was on my way to Join my wife In Paris
LIDO no, intend to take yon, with me, in this
Tearing " Of this s case before s sr Justice Cave
Sn, you sSs % f yoSr sbso
lutely ineScusabie Intervention in, May and
crsiited piaintl not only only as s any proae
eution BY me or by anybody; but against any
msSe sad To as 81 sS
81 the ., who prCmoted her false r, and
this Ia told In the authentic records
81 the case put and kept by you and b. M
essSnS only ny w Tsfon {.
5sisr 70, the ysrie at, Of AZ have to say
this cas-. is summed up. however. in the simple
fact that after hearing Of seven calendar
jury as false and fraudulent. And it remains
for you to ind. Il you can. in the authentic,
that Mr. Justice Cave had TO say about this
Ease to the jury. any shadow OF pretext
against all efrectnai inquiry and investication.
pont as an;' Gsb ey ths
after hearing Of seven calendar days by the |
verdict OF Jury which pronounced her suit !!
asapsi Due t not be ndl ss1 f Sn
directly. to you. and to your secret and mex |
gsSr HI nag in sSat
every eonsideration OF self respect and Of
ally IN your own country. and from ascertain
Ing whether the law OF your own country |
cious wrong you have done me. and against
the monstrous injury and injustice inflicted
sequences. not indirect; but direct. Of this
secret and inexsnsable intervention Of yours
10 this letter the. plain facts OF the hearing OF
this case before Mr. Justice Cave in April. 1891
Of that hearing would be to give every Impair
tial reader Of this letter a true measure OF the
"dSn s s. sscee 5y es
ineXcusable Intervention ia May and June,
fffpst Fl IN pssF a f you
deny th the rn nqthsne res9rds Of this case
must do You the justice. however. to say
that neither 10 the official cogrespondence be-
o nor in your speeeh ana ad Ie9 IN P the
House Of Lords on June 20. 1852 is there any n.y.
shes TO saS% st S. nns
more malignant and INSCRIPTIONS organs OF
to Of the
is ely OF an wd
was shrewd enough to, leave tho eI.
Murray yefs 70 be 5sa
The plaintiff, who had as Obvious an interest In
and 81 the Sa1 ssna
81 Sss fact Sst 81 ssHs
to two uni mpoa ched and unim pea cha bio wit
Murray thaH to say that Roiland G" crowd %i to
m"ss Mss eaed ana visited
tation Tor sssacty viii not Se damaged esp by
s ss d9n vii be found to have kept your
sponsibility" for the cuck 90 cry as ridiculous as
It WAS malignant. raised by the mendacious
verdict was given in my favor by an honest
Is W isse Msi1 s5y in D ISL
rraS in the light Of tho authonti ea records 81
sf &nsd %ar 9a5 that
If Ap moist l and has ever since had
Esepns himself ons 81 the ,ea lsaeh 'S OF
russs il Mr. not JuS1 UNLIKELY in the
confront him with the prospect Of b eise sent mt
INTO renal seryitude for q eonsidabie time!'
not fJ euskGO cry
sMfS sr2ay
him to the pleasing posi- titles Of penal servi.
.diilcation and niightenment But how Wv va hs
,bIe this contribution Of. yours has been not
vas meant to protect against investigation. I" I
hing in May It is nova as clear s aus ths
the i"a. BHI rssts In thH last
possible for the cuckoo cry there's NO sneb II
'erson as Milfred Murray" to be taken up. re- v
,eated ana reechoed throughout your country ,
NJ OF the interests Of public Justice! ''' ],
lou It WAS who took this case out Of the Z
injury and to the injury OF the "interests Of
y utlic Justice" You 1t was who took 1t out OF y
ne sphere OF law into the sphere OF politics Il
on cannot deny this! You are built in COM. Il
artments." and you will scarcely aver / sun h
pom pom me in the House Of Lords on June 50 $,
S.'2. IN your capacity as the Lord Chief Jls. II
H A as political partisan and o Jealous q
,lanstonian peer Of Parliament You must d.
therefore, take the responsii ility Of the in. al
ecent and outrageous fashion Ia which. nv II
t,er members Of your political party this a.
ase was dragged out OF the domain OF Justice d.
nd OF law into the arena Of partisan poiities II
. the preSs and In the House of Commons an | A
0oh as verdict was given In my favor on the | re
9th OF April. 1891. w '"' 81
Mfst wfs the The relevancy for example any