Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1893-08-30

{ two ~ lend Tor tho proposed sewer inrn,
" higu WIS lee l1r my signature. ! bog iu
say tha' / euuuu' cunsiHtoutiy sign tho
report iu us present form, ~, according
to my mind, The question as to ha IL
best to do depends entirely upon what
we arc able To- go.
1t we are sble to build only 10 the
nearest available pnce, then the Me-.
CARNEY tract IL the busi. the soil huro
~ not we'll adapted to take caro- ~ %
utOat amount ui moisture but with tho
available area it g. sufficient To- dispose uI
tho sewage ior sumu limo, or uutl we
arc nhl 90 do better 10y extending .ho
sewer further northward.
II we are able tu go beyond th1 Nc.
Caitncy tract. but not able 90 gn 70. iAi as
the Blrnham irnct, then the trockor
estate tract il the bu-t place, 81 'uU
soil here g. VOL calculated tu uh-
sorb q considerable amount at moisture
nud tho iwci is suilliruuy largo To
serve u- for quito nuuubor OF years.
II uuco ,Hary ihe sewage cen Ne ii-.rhu-
ted from this point on .p joining .uud,,
either south. west or ORTIZ. This rYlul
iH about $500 foot be- uud tho Mptur uey
tract and viii EOS. 80 che futo " about $40
per foot. vt s.I, 900 moro than 90 ttFrll tho
Mccartney place As YOUR reports rD.
rocitus, ihtru has already been pA-
pended tp reach tui- point several thuu-
sand dollar, iur rlgul 90 way, tigurhiug
aud materials delivered, beyond the Me
CarinCy tract
10 wouIe abio 10 build io tha Burnham
Tract We would have .u ldCul site, a, tho
ground extends from the Jordan riNur
eastward Tor nearly two milo, providing
Tor .ubd1iuHrc directly into Tho river. 4
necessary 80 any munro timp. tho land
l. ample aud the sull we'll suiIcl for Tho
purpo'c. ln reaching hi. tract wo
would command he land which liot uu.
tween % ana tuu Mccartney tract, vi ct
which Extending wc.t Go ihc rIyuU otu
Oc uuli1,d ly tapping tao sewer ut -ui d
pblc Intermediate pu.ut.. Tui.. boz my
opinion. viii no The ultimate .ytmiuua
~ the sewer but who her wo nre ublo
TO build tu 70 40 tho present lime,
IN auuiher question. THIS tract Hos
about 5000 itti uoi oul the Cfurkof pstn e.,
aud about 800 fcUi beyond iho Ne.
CARNEY place. Tho cost ~ extending 10
TO this pOiui would DO uhnu. -lu5,Ull
more Than tu reach the Mccartney tract
aud uhou 5000 more than 10 build 20
the trocKer u.utc.
To summarize tuo above in accordance
with my opinion, these thrco properties
would sand Ia tine order ct value for our
purpose a. fulluaE
First The BuruhHm tract.
Second ~ ho Crocl,er estate.
lhlfu IN" MclNfinry tract.
Regarding the pr,1os asked Tor tho re-.
spccuvo trbc.s, ! consider It iu each cu-u
much beyond the actual mnrkv value
aud favor condemnation rather than ur-
chase ~ the baud. o. tho nsurO-.
AZ before stated, 10 soOms 10 mo simply
a question ~ what tho cts sable 10 do;
and ~ this lsa mater which / do not
feet competent % advise the Council upon
/ prefer To- ROMAN silont uuloss hoy
should d0sifo my opinion ne to the best
location i0t the arm, Independents Of the
question ng 10 what We are able TO do, Ia
which ease you arc &C liberty 10 append
M. TO the commiuco's report, u you
think best.
Rich demanded TO know why MIR.
Benrislry had st1ppsI the WORK on the
gravity sewer, but he was only laugh, d
at.
Looiboutow's motion then carried.