Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1893-11-18
CRIMINAL APPEALS


II Nlitluk -
he siate-F-om Con
4 Ts1' ,' NJ, for theft Of a horse.
Ese 8 II spooaer, the trial judge in
.I,ass 4 having been district attorney
gis sap ss9,.ic, IN which the prosecution
ia' p nj having in fact received and
h, a ~ complaint as district attorney
f'sd p - fhis prosecution is based,
N 81 Dot under tbe law sit IN ,ne case
'Oao ~ Sln c. G. Pl; and the mo
Sc A ,.,w +he case from the jury
i,a1 % Nllt,;i,ing the above fact, should
Mo sslsi ' . ,,,,,.,rtinel, and upon being
i've petn scenled 10 The question Is
rlnpu! ~ this court. For the rea-
tfopein ,rithout going into the other
j. aa.eN r,iSSl the Judgment IS re-
|'1esll,s "a ne cause reTnhnded. Cpln-
C. y Icbuson ". the St1te-Irom
p Appellant was convicted OF
tlinss. owner and manager of a the
Iere - Intoxicating liquor was sid
tiE s,bich he knowingly employed
% .i n ana permitted them TO dis
49, hea,,salyes In lewd and indecent
q ~ ma he was fined 500. The
13l. shows that the women en-
~ VI ,rsre known prostitutes. Tie stat
5ese rfs1fcl II either a prostitute is
sjavsa Knowingly or by such woman
". W n.rnit,ed after employment 10 con
y terseif IN an indecent manner, as
i.s,ir shown in this case. The APP
NV nv being faced with q record, such
= have before us in this case, can
s,ressfuly plead his Ignorance af
!. 4araeier or acts Of the women em-
~ hs him, and finding no reversible
~ ~ Judgment is affirmed. Opinion
n snkins, ] o.,
JAa NJ Young VS.. the Siate-From
.-s,ilss. Conviction for the theft of
r. Garcia's horse. The court sub
f,,ll no error In oyerrnling appellants
f-st,ion for continuance. The evidence
1 srpy sufficient to support the allega-
4 Bit che horse was the property of
- Garcia. The evidence Of Fly and
4 n. 10 he effect that the prosecution
4 name Of Jesus Garcia after this
-rntlon was instituted was compe-
n, EVIDENCE. There was no error in
Irrolng he demurrer TO the evidence
\ AZ oWner. etc. Mills and others cor
$50 Bradley. the accomplish, most
spaily. Judgment affirmed. Opinion
x HUT, r. j,
litA johnson VS.. State: from LlanO.
IN, 4 a conviction for keeping disor-
IN house as defined by article 311a,
igr oi the iwenty-iirst Legislature, page
,l Appellant ran variety thentcr.
'lhe issues ON the trial We're; /. We're
prostitutes lcwd women, or women Of
BAL reputation Tor chastity employed or
lepi 10 sefrice in said theaier; or, were
sath women permitted 10 display or COM
|lsS themselves IN n lewd, lascivious or
,ndetai nannerf 2. Did TIE appellant
kroE he character Of the women whom
BE- eupoyedi or, after learning that their
laarsrieT gas bad, retained them in his
lerief, and did he knowingly permit
aA women to conduct or display them
lafes IN q icwd or indecent manner?
,ciznliing the testimony as shown by
y fctofd, we answer in the affirmative,
y I testimony can establish anything;
lsraster (for chastity Of the women en-.
~ oy appellant. The Charge Of the
rlhpfs InoWiedgc ~ ~ ,iiu ueSu@ a., oi
airnent affirmed oninion by tirr,
" i"'h
Reeves Wilson vs. Stoto, from Con.
iie, Conviction Of msnsial laYa, "f fnr
\ evidence IN ms casc lSnE;ry ,o W l n
liant inflicted a wound unon deccnsal
tit a rock. II fails To- sbow consnirocT
tween bImsnlf ana nc hrotLar S;n?
b was supposed IN bnvc spahhs5 m,
lcgasel about the titnn anne'iont used
\ rock. The court erred IN rcfmsing IN
l0E appellant TO proyo Tho nxtont ~ tho
iaiy Inflicted by Tho rock nnd tbere
hi al absence ~ nrnef ~ -, nst oi,iii.i,
-9iiacyl, he should have been allowed
q lnio the subject fully: because If
aen thai deatE WAS not produced By
Z Use Of the rock, appellant might have
siped. The court erred secondly in
ll.lng tie special instructions re-
nsetJ, they very pertinently called the
,Il,s attention 10 the proper charge.
'Aq'd' Opinion by Hurt, p. j,
uALN ESION APPEALS COURT.
peaa to the Gazette.
Galveston. Tev NJ. 1c M It'll
urt OF anneais I,ot -. ~ ne clYli
the follnwing ~, tO-u"g ana passed.
Reversed onJ ro,,,,ni,,. w e
. Sater Niilii,, n'iii',' w ~ Skelefs
ches, 'Hs Vo'iip'i'y' from Nacog-
Reversed os .. CO - o.,
FINED as ~ Satih az, ~, Skinner ma
leans railvs n',.lor, texas ahd New
inner frnr' company vs. sarah II.
n '" n III.