The Hawaiian star. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu]) 1893-1912, 1893-07-28

Spooner, ejectment; Kinney for plain
tiffs; Carter e. Carter for defendant.
S. Ehrlich VS.. X. c. Peterson, tres
pass, c. W. Ashford for plaintiff
Hartwell for defendant.
NJ Campbell ct al VS., N. Hookanc
ct al, action on bond Monsarrat fol
plaintiffs.
FOREIGN JURY-CIvIL.
L. Ahlo VS.. Tai Lung, assumpsit
Ashford for plaintiff; Hatch for de
PENDANT
Catherine Bachelor VS.. C. B. VIII
son, trespass; Ashford for plaintiff
chCarter for defendant.
H. Wilegeroth VS.. EVA Plantation
Co., damage. Ashford for plaintiff
Castle for defendant.
In re bankruptcy of T. Ahung, bank.
rupt's appeal from order of Judge
Whiting committing him to prison.
Skinner & Co. VS.. c. w. Macfarane
& Co., Claus Spreckels, garnishee, as
sumpsit. c. Brown for plaintiffs;
Hatch for garnishee.
Pun Gee VS.. Loo Chez, damage; APP
peal from District Court, Honolulu.
Hartwell for plaintiff; Davidson for
defendant-appellant.
E. B. Thomas VS.. Captain Anderson,
damage; appeal from District Court,
Honolulu. Ashford for plaintiff ap-
pelant; c. Brown for defendant
James Campbell VS.. J. F. Bowler,
assumpsit; appeal from District Court,
Honolulu c. Brown for plaintiff;
Creighton for defendant-appellant.
C. A. Brown VS.. Bulletin Publishing
Co., trespass on the case. Hatch for
plaintiff
Man Hop Co. VS.. Lau Pew, damage;
appeal from District Court of Homo
lulu. Davidson for plaintiff; Castle
for neutrality-suspicious..
J. A. Low VS.. M. Homer, action
on a judgment Neumann for plain.
tiff: c. w. Ashford for defendant.
Tung Yuk VS.. Ngao Lux, case
Hartwell for plaintiff; Neumann-C reigh-
ton for defendant.
Bishop & Co. VS.. C. E Williams ct
AL, assumpsIt Hatch for plaintiffs;
Attorney General for defendant
G. A. Brown VS.. Provisional Govern
ment Hawaiian Islands, assumpsit
Hatch for plaintiff; Attorney General
for defendant.
Tong On Jan & Co. VS.. Akvna, alias
Seu San WAL assumpsit. Hatch for
plaintiffs
Allen & Robinson VS.. G. w. Lincoln
ct al, assumpsit Hatch for plaintiff;
Kinney for garnishee.
Allen & Robinson VS.. F. H. Red.
ward, assumpsit. Hatch for plaintiff
Allen & Robinson VS.. G. w. Lincoln,
assumpsit. Hatch for plaintiff
Thomas Mott VS.. c, T. Gulick
guardian, assumpsit, c. w. Ashford
for plaintiff; Kinney for defendant.
E. c. Crick VS.. E. G.. Hitchcock,
marshal, damage, Peterson for plain
tiff; Attorney General for defendant.
T. w. Rawlins VS., Honolulu Soap
Works Co., damage c. Brown for
plaintiff; Hartwell for defendant.
c. A. P. Gardiner VS.. E. G. Hitch
cock, marshal, damage. Peterson
Creighton for plaintiff; Attorney. Gen
eral for defendant.
F. Shiefer VS.. Olowalu Sugar Co.,
case. Rosa for plaintiff; Hatch for
defendant
Thow Choy VS.. E. G. Hitchcock,
marshal, case; appeal from District
Court of Honolulu, Hartwell for
plaintif-appellant; Attorney General
for defendant,
Lau Chuck VS., f. G. Hitchcock,
marshal, case; appeal from District
Court of Honolulu Hartwell for plain
tif-appellant; Attorney General for
defendant.
In re estate of J. F. o. Banning, ap-
peal from Cooper, J., in chambers.
Hartwell- Kinney for plaintiff appellant;
Hatch for administrator.
JURY WAIVED.
Hawaiian Carriage Manufacturing
Co. VS. ]. Kaiaikawaha ct al, assump-
sit, Creighton for plaintiff; c. Brown
for defendant.
], NJ, Raposo VS.. J. J. Fernandez,
summary possession of land; appeal
from District Court of Honolulu. Ma
COON for plaintiff appellant.
S. Z. Pierce VS.. Z. B, Thomas, as,
sumpsit; appeal from District Court OF
Honolulu. Creighton for plaintiff
Thomas Wright vs. B. +. White,
assumpsit; appeal from District Court
of Honolulu. Creighton for plaintiff;
Rosa for defendant-appellant
A. l.. Cron VS.. J. II. Love, assump-
sit; appeal from District Court of Hon
olulu. Magoon for plaintiff Peterson
for defendant-appeIlant.
Carl Henoch VS.. Hawaiian Govern.
ment assumpsit Hatch for plaintiff;
Attorney General for defendant.
Al SIC Mor,a Dal,co