The Abbeville press and banner. [volume] (Abbeville, S.C.) 1869-1924, 1893-02-15
JURY NO. 2.
ORDERS.

W.
Samuel Haynes against Rebecca Dunlap,
and others Order to +. r.ference.
John 9. Edwards against r. l.. Williams.
Judgment, Sl,784H.
W. H. Parker against Mary I. Cason. Judg-
ment of foreclosure.
CASES TRIED.
Sarah ]. Martin and A. T.. Armstrong,
plaintiffs, against &. Park Bowie and F. A.
Spellman, defendants. Jurors In this case
J. T. Speed, foreman. J. W, Cobb.
Nj. H. Wilson, WE McCord,
b. l.. Cllnkscales, ]. w. j. Simpson,
j. u. Duncan, J. w. Carlisle,
]. A. Latham, JIM. Wright.
Witnesses Tor plaintiff-W. Il. Bullock, r.
w. r. Nance, J. NJ. White, Hugh Wilson, s.
j. Martin, A. T. Shirley, s. c.. Cason, j. +.
Defendants attorneys argued for motion
for non-suit. Motion over-ruled.
Verdict Of Jury: We sfnn find for the plaintiff
DEFENDANTS counsel gave notice OF inten-
tion to make motion for a new trial. Judge
deserved his decision.
w. A. Branch, as administrator, against
Port Royal and Western Carolina Railway
Company; Jurors:
w. II. Pennel, j. w. J. Simpson,
]. r. Hannah, w. T. McCord,
J. A. Latham, J. w. Cobb,
J. p, Duncan, % m .,o,,I& J;W; ~ Carlisle: e: ~, NJ
B. sturkey, Miss Sue Hanvey, Mrs. w. A.
Branch, Miss Rosa Banch, J. V. Scott.
Witnesses for deferdant-P. d. Klugh, E. L..
Foster, Albert Walker, g. A. Miller, A. A.
Walden.
This case was brought tor damages in the
death OF q son OF Mr.. Branch while In the
employ Of the road. The suit was for $1,000
and consumed two days OF the Court, the 18th
any Werdicl""We Tde md for the plaintiff $780,"
Defendants counsel gave notice they would
make motion for new trial.
The Court held that new trial would be
granted unless the judgment was reduced TO
81 .5O0-to which the plaintiff consented, and
so the case thus ends.
Meinhard Brothers & Co. agai.st ]. T..
Youngblood. Jurors:
A. B. Ellis, J. II. Lattmer,
H. L. Rasor, +. g. Perrin,
Kinney Milford. W. King,
]. u. Alewine, w. E. Lesly,
A. B. Robinson, L. J. Robinson,
ID. A. Wardlaw, s. E. Rosenwike.
Witnesses for plaintif-E. A. Vile. ]. T.
Johnson, W. r. Richey' P. L. sturkey, W. L.
Witnesses for detense-H. G. Smith, T. F.
Riley.
In procuring the attachments to be issued
against their co-detendant, ]. T. Youngblood,
act In collusion with the said j. T. Young
blood for the purpose OF defrauding the other
creditors Of the said ]. T. Youngblood.
Answer-"Yes." A. B. Ellis, foreman.
This was case to set aside an attachment t,
because 1t was alleged that 1t preferred some
creditors to the detriment and Injury OF 9TH
ers.
A. A. Hand, petitioner, against the Green.
wood Compress Company and Jesse Thom-
Consent Verdict by jury No. 2: ave find
In response to the Issue submitted 10 US in
the Within order that there is due 70 the
plaintiff upon his contract with the defen-
dant the sum OF Sl,2l5.
Simmons Hardware Co., against Bank Of
J. T. Speed. J.w. Cobb,
F. l.. Morrow, s. L. Edmunds,
B. LCIinkscales, J. y: King,
NJ. H. Wilson, j. w. j. Simpson,
J. A. Latham, w. T. McCord,
]. d. Duncan, ]. W. Carlisle.
Witnesses for plain tif-R. S. Sparkman, w.
Witnesses for defendant-J. W. Greene, j.
F. Davis, j. T. Medlock.
Verdict-Sl7S.56 for plaintiff.
The issue involved IN this case was, that
Jervey & Co.. had drawn check in favor OF
Green wood. The Bank of Greenwood at the
time thought that Jervey Co., had suffj-
cient money on depost to their credit
Hardware CO. 1t was afterward ascertained
that there was mistake OF Sl0O on the bal.
ance sheet which left not sufficient money to
their credit TO pay the draft, and so the Bank
of Greenwood refused to honor II.
Loeb Bros. & Co., against William D. Mann,
Sheriff. Jury No.2.
Witnesses for plaintiff. s. Loeb, +. C. Per-
ry, +. g. Graydon.
Witnesses for defendant--C. d. Brown, w.
H. Parker, w. T. Powell, e. Hughes, w. G.
Verdict-"We find for the plaintiff to re-
tain the goods and chattes now In bis posses
sion, amounting 10 S223.64, and $50 damages"
The point in this case, was that Loeb Bros,
had sent TO F. c. Perry the goods in dispute
on consignment, with the understanding that
Perry would pay for the same when sold.
The goods were received the same day on
which Perry made his assignment. and when
the Sheriff went TO take possession or The
goods In the store, he like faithful officer,
ought to do, took everything in sight, TO
which proceeding the Loeb Bros objected,
and hence brought this suit.
Wilburn Gin and Machine Co. against Nine
ty-Six Manufacturing Co, tried by jury No: =.
Witnesses for Plaintiff. g. Peoples, M.
Richardson, w. II. Parker.
Verdict for plalntiff-S53S.O5.
Rachael Rapley against j. C. Klugh for re-