Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1893-06-21

49,
Austin. Tex. june 2o.-lspedall -.Ihe sn.
preme court decided the following '"7'S
'T 1barlottc Il. Jones ct al. vs., ]. A. Lee,
from lirNur THIS case was fee',h-{ hs,.,,ia a,v
~ this court, ~ which time llc ,uugW,n'
~ tiir majority, chief Justice siaytnn Vl.-
ma the cause retnandcd Prom the decision
OF tile minority, hict usicv SlaY'9u WI
grnted a motion for rehchring was kl1Nl,n
and the Judgment Of the court u 'lfu Hp,
,,n,ts II nav affirmed. Associate Justice
tiamrs expresses doubt NJ ~ me tuWn'us,u,''
reached hut dips not SIGNIFY M ur1'H.
Tim ifnusferrcd To j. W Smith Nho trans
frrred an undivided hat 70 huv'h sutH',
me certificate was located Oh iht lahN ~
controversy. After SMITHS DEAN I9nr, huu
NJ .e ns nduinistrauiN VI smiths IS
tatc abandoned the location U.u' "a
Smiths lifetime, toated tue ceIuhvn'e ,hW''
located II ON land IN l'n1, ,"urs5 p1il,r
land IN Comal county was sou N ~ ul'u
order uf tine probate court OF ,''Nhr 'N"uY
upou The application OF Mrs; Lee w ~
uimlstratrix, at which say lohS1 ,.ss ,ot
iitinned. The court holding that the iunas
In Frlo county, located ny virtue W wy
Morales certificate belonged w N1al pIl'
la thr estate Of Smith ana % Luv,u ~ go i
H. 9eru tnotl Jones mndr affidavit thhl ht
WAS the owner OF Cotuneate ~, 9hu y
duplicate was issued 10 hlnii Wln,n ~, n,l,,
inrntcd en- the surveys IN fri9 county, ep2,n
which Il was hrst located. rue Ihhlnlih ~
error claim under Jones. lhr u'ionlgtilss
undcr smith aud Mrs. Lee; lhe p'ln'il1I'
question to decide y, w A,s, iy.' ,bc law
ministrntrix, have authority uhH9t VIZ iaw KIN
10 abandon the location 1f Ve M1Iu"s IN
tidcatc made by Ioncs and sun ~, ,H,.
| Jld, the cerl,ufnle MNs w "iSn,'i il, Conai
! innd and when located on inuu w w" i,
| tiwnty was merged In the luni. when NO.
tract. being sold 70 Jones un XIV.
order Of the prnbAle eou Nv, rgcai,.
risht NJ smiths estate In the tfIhntaa'
,,,s vested IN the proportion wat lhe lul,n
| ,iiv Of land purchased bore TO w N' ti,,'r
| II Mrs I.er had no Huch auth9ilf' ,I
! lie certificate remained MERGED ~ hn NY ~
| ~ t-,in c1unty. When the certificate was 10
,t,I II becptne merged and was rear ",
| fate. - Tex, Sup. aU', Wien Ntsss...ii,o
! became administrator sne v9o ld l,,s,ger 10
| M trustee. not owner. she iau lMlm,vit nv
dla,,,si. ~ il under provisions OF Jaw NY ~,
| af'nrluc 10 her own JuiAn AT. ~ t,a
what law conld she ppahlon op yrc wilma.
Ma The law carefully presgflbes w ~,
| ioses for which land nh4 PC Nhv taf al,
| h1ulnlstrntrlX, and we nnd no l4N ~ i,,,,J
l VIZ a lisuoslfion OF tie land % an esluI'
es was attempted 10 this yasc. ne u W.
pncahlty Of the case u i XIX 70 was
a-,,,iy demonstrated IN the lissenlhH Hplnt
,a, ~ Ghipf Justice Sinyton ! Is f,rsi
,tat me location WAS foffelteu " VT ,,'itl
Instance y reason iPemepts regarding re.
mn ~ nsld NOTES but n this Is go " '1u .,,
,hf nave occurred until ailet Jun a,ri,,ia
! chuscd the CpllAl fOuhi9 49, al, In fh4
MI have the eject TO conltt ~ ~ ,deaiip,,
h,ia@afe uron Jones and ne fe'lvl ,t. ~
al Tie certificate innfeI 70 ns. trs ea.
Smiths estate. We cYn.,lVr,,, ti,,,ritv 10 abnn.
r. i,n M location OF the ceruhrals ul'n W., w..
iaud In controversy. lhe H'V ,.,i.,,,ints az
hearing Is granted, anu Wy = M, ,iisfrlrf
Az feiirt Of dvll appeals aiu ~ wv W n
IN, .i,e are affirmed opinion by bs9NN' ~ %
s sale rs. city Of Austin, All ihs
t,,t nrcsetlted hy the moiipu loi Fe',t,,iis
In Ills case. save QUE Meiy ~ Id ths
spnslls oninien. Ne do not see ihAl NY
io' III thera Determined iemnia VIZ 49,, TX
Mer discussion. Il v now ,.1re abo heard
Tor me iI .r,,i,,..i tha cause 10 thc irlai ,eni
nhh 9tts,,,,,ltfed 10 III 10 thr case Ahn ~
Nsrrfnra neither ihat svnIi ~ ss.rnir,sl
lsflri,u annals nor Tits court lrg ~ ~.
OF ciNn, nfl' fba rauae The question Wv
w seii.ei IN Inc irinl court but y p',i NV
, fer the hrsi time ms tt.ta,iied 70 be
fact Of disqnahns.s,'uie,n,i Glis .Durt has
shoMn ,,,So afndavit OF cihefwist =, " sr,t
l|Mt,' NM ~ doterminrd, 81 a-eellHir y X
matter u fact ~ MAJ H. iirisdietlon
TIE pive Z s,ss D. iint VI 90 NJ n
3 Seh 1,-,nd fhat this provision - i.a ,rer,
+; siituti0n applies q gls,,snis nare been pgl
!, ~, .r M me trial court. hut IN = ~ III
~ .sa as arise after hnal disi2al..i , e,pea
! ave IN the eguri from ,Wsa1lticaliy 20 o.
! Is taEeu 4 Pa. essh Gfhhan. q TeA
liel, oo,ri .,insf 10 the AFN M
hss, ,5I Il own isI.aeti9n,o 59 IA, s1li
audsilon anlcUhk W u. affer ti,e inM deei'
y I'm, "e nmffcrs ~ cor'foye.-2 ~, y
ion ar o. an' ihe sprsiate CIV. NJ ee rscor
4. ntcessiiy heN a...er,niue II. ne qn'su....aa
n IN oidrr 20 ne trial court Aed lui','1ril
4 w ,,an n,Sst k aeisrialnsd BY .,,solea i
y i irhs noiion IL oseiluiea. -'sN :
e Gaines. A J.