Idaho semi-weekly world. [volume] (Idaho City, Idaho Territory) 1875-1908, 1893-07-04
HI.AINEANDCONKLING
THE NEW YORK Ex-SENAToR'S STO-
Rv OF THE LIFELONG FEUD.

| 4 Charge of Receiving Illegal Fees which
| the Statesman Never Forgave-One Side
| OF an Estrangoment That Meant Much to
| American History.
Colonel Edward Gerhard. lawyer in
| the Mutual Life Insurance building, said
that he thought the true reason for the
sitter feeling between Roscoe Conkling
and James q Blaine had never been
printed, He said that during Mr.. Conk-
Iing's life in New York city he frequently
met the great Republican statesman
from Utica. and on several occasions
they talked about his difference with Mr.
Blaine. Colonel Gebhard said:
"Conkling used to come up to see me.
We were intimate friends and one after
noon told him that ] would like to get
at the bottom Of the estrangement be-
tween Mr. Blaine and himself told
Mr. Conkling that 1t seemed to me alb
surd that man who had been lawyer
all his life and public man. should
have taken offense at Mr.. Blaine's speech
calling him turkey gobbler. etc. 1t
was something could not comprehend.
Mr. Conkling replied: 1t is just as alb
surd TO me to take it that way as it is to
you You know have practiced law
all my life. II lawyers permitted the
animosities of public trials to warp their
sensibiltes, we would be in fight with
all the world The true cause of the
quarrel between Mr. Blaine and myself
il that Mr. Blaine took an unfair advan-
tage OF me in the house Of representa-
tives to reflect upon my personal integ-
rity.
In the discussion growing out Of the
discontinuing OF the office Of provost
marshal general Mr. Blaine rose to a
question of personal privilege. Mr..
Conkling told me that he did not pay
much attention to Mr. .Blaine's speech
until he heard his name mentioned.
Then after listening. he found Blaine
was making a personal assault, foreign
to the matter OF personal privilege and
alien to the subject under discussion.
Conkling said he listened. and the more
he listened the more he was amazed, and
then he became angry Conkling said
that he so lost control of himself under
the impulse Of the moment that he went
to his friend. Thad Stevens, and said:
Mr. Stevens, yon have heard what
Mr. Blaine has just said What shall
doa The question of personal privilege
Mr.. Blaine used was a personal attack
upon my integrity. He has character
lied me as a man who has accepted EN-
ployment from the government while
was u member of congress, and while in
that employment had received fees paid
to me by Secretary Stanton, and that the
fees embraced pay for services which
had been illegally rendered by me to the
government of the United States in do
ing some work in the western part of the
state This work included the investi-
cation Of certain bounty frauds which
had taken place in Elmira, and the sec
rotary came to me and employed me to
get at the root of tho trouble. | devoted
a great deal Of time to the business, and
the upshot was that the government re-
covered, through my efforts, many thou.
sands of dollars. Upon my return to
Washington Secretary Stanton sent for
me and offered $4,000 in payment for
my services, which ! refused to accept.
said to him at that time that if was
to receive anything ! preferred to ar
range the price myself, and at all events
would not accept such sum.
Pending the discussion between Sec
rotary Stanton and myself | went to
Utica and talked over the matter with
Governor Seymour and Judge DEMO,
chief judge Of the court of appeals, both
Democrats told them that | did not
want to take step which could be used
against me in any way did not want
to make show of purity that would be
ridiculous, and | did not care about &C.
cepting u fee that might be questioned.
On my return to Washington the check
of Secretary Stanton was reduced to
$4,000 Even then was timid about ac-
cepting it, but Stanton said: by Godl
know what services are worth have
been lawyer all my life, and this money
you have got to take" did take the
money. ! felt that | had earned it, and
when Mr. Blaine referred to this in the
house felt that he had taken mean nd
vantage, and determined never to speak
to him again.
MIR Coukling told me, continued Mr.
Gehhard, that Mr.. Stevens said to him,
I'll attend to this for you, Mr.. Conkling,
and will call for committee of inquiry"
"a commit yyaa nnpoiptnl for tl,a
purpose of investigating and reporting
and when it became evident that the re-
port Of the committee would entirely
exonerate Mr.. Conkling from the alleged
irregularities. then it was that he recog-
nized the fine hand of Mr. Blaine or his
friends in the successful attempt to frus-
trate the purposes for which the com
mittee was appointed.
Mr.. Conkling told me that he never
spoke to Mr.. Blaine from that time; that
all the charges that Blaine had brought
against him were groundless. That is
the cause for my feeling against Mr..
Blaine, said Mr.. Conkling. and | shall
never speak to the man again or recog-
nize him till he, in as public place as
the house of representatives, makes an
apology for the assault he made upon
me at that time.
Several attempts were made to recon-
cile Mr. Conkling and Mr. Blaine, but
Mr. Conkling always said When Mr..
Blaine gets up in congress and takes
back this charge, then will be prepared
10 meet him. and until he does it there |
L.