Bismarck weekly tribune. [volume] (Bismarck, Dakota [N.D.]) 1884-1943, 1893-02-10
.Ioint Conxention

JUIllG COuVcuIlOu CIlC UcIlO-
cratic vote was polied for Mr.. Roach, and
the full populist for Mr.. Muir, except that
Messrs. Thompson and Elliott were absent.
The vote stood: Kingman q, Muir Is,
Roach q, Palmer 81, Fl. F. Miller l.
Those who voted for Mr.. Kingman were:
Messrs. Arnold, Engerr, Fuller, Gregory,
Pa%gsr p1R6am wo4s Et1 wbe Mey5ay nnayy
Boynton, Bullard, Churchill, Cochrane
Havrevold, Larson, Ritter, Severson,
Simpson, Strom, Tufts, Wallen, Wishek
-27.
Those who voted for Mr.. Palmer We're:
Messrs. Cashel, Day, Ink, LaMoure,
Miller, Sorley, Svensrud. Benedict, Burk-
hardt, Davis, Halvorson, Haugen, Lohnes.
McArthur. Oksendahl, Satterlund, Veeder,
Wineman. Wright, Yegen, Walsh-2l.
Mr.. Pierce voted for Mr.. Miller.
Mr.. Hurley, OH behalf of Mr.. kingman,
withdrew his name from further consider
alton as candidate and stated that his
original supporters were now ready to
the nomination and election. He thanked
those who had supported their candidate,
but it was apparent that sacrifice was de-
manded and they were ready to make it
for the sake OF harmony and the party'S
good. Afterward Mr.. Hurley stated that
Times and Grand Forks Herald concern
ing the alleged $4,000 deal with Casey's
managers had the effect to cause Mr.
kingman to withdraw. While there was
not one word of truth in the statement, it.
had caused criticism at home and was hav
ing its influence among the members and
to such an extent as to jeopardize the elec
tion OF the whole story in all Of its bearings
and all of its relations, show that it
is simply based on the theory
that such an organization for the thorough
management of his campaign as Senator
Casey had, would cost something, and if
some one else they might fairly be eX-
pected to be willing to divide the expense.
One of the dark horse candidates started
the story and others helped it along. II
was Indignantly denied by Mr.. Casey and
by every party concerned. and was simply
absurd on its face.
Last Nights Caucus.
At the caucus last evening thirteen
ballots were had and fortyseven members
present. John Mller's vote reached 20,
but on the next ballot fell to Is and closed
at Ii. Henry F. Miller started at IL and
ranged from to II. Frank Palmers vote
reached 9, Worst S. There was no signiti-
cance to the other votes. Twenty-Five
persons were voted for, running from one
to six. At the close of the thirteenth
ballot, Jud LaMoure, chairman, said he
had enough of the foolishness and put on
his hat and left, saying they could elect
another chairman, intimating that lie did
not intend to participate in any further
caucus meetings. Several OF the members
followed LaMoure, when Simpson moved
that Gregory be the unanimous choice of
the caucus. Hurley put the motion and
responses came from every part Of the hail.
1t was declared carried. Some suggested
another ballot and it was proposed that
Roderick johnson be elected chairman,
but the members dispersed without a
formal adjournment. most OF them satisfied
with the young Napoleon of the house. Mr..
Gregory. What the future has III store
Thirteen ballots were taken last even
ing, making seventy-two in all, as follows:
lIasgart l, LaAl0ure l, Gregory l, New
man l. Ordway2. Worst 1, Palmer =, II. F.
Miller +. John Miller Ii.
Gregory /, Ordway l: Corliss l, LaMoure
l, f. White l, H. F. Miller s, Worst I, John
Miller IL, Palmer.
Walsh l, Ordway l, Corliss l, j. il.
Power yn l. i;'srg G'rsgG5yp Or Worst II. r. Miller
., JIO. Mlllcl lSs 1dllllOI 4.
Lounsberry l. A. Hughes l, Ink /, X.
Pollock l, Worst 1, Ordway l. Palmer S.
II. +. Miller 3. John Miller II, GregOry2.
Gregory 4, Worst I, Ordway 2. II. +.
Miller Z, Palmer 8. John Miller Is.
Lounsberry +, II. Hughes l, B. Fuller |,
Ordway l, Palmer 2, Gregory 8, II. F. Miller
s. John Miller 20, Worst 3.
DR.. Falk l, Ordway l, Hughes l. Worst
=, Gregory 2. +. White l, Palmer 8, ii. f.
Miller 9, John Miller Is.
Ordway 2. Hughes l, Gregory .. II. +.
Miller IL, Worst &, John Miller Is. Palmer
8, Walsh l.
John Miller II, Worst 8, Ordway l, II. F..
Miller 10, Gregory 1, Palmer 5, Hurley l.,
Hughes l.
John Miller II. John ii. Worst i, II. +.
Miller 9, n. Il. Ordway |, Charles Gregory
l, Alex Hughes 9, Frank Palmer 8, II. F..
Arnold l.
John Miller II. John II. Worst s, Henry
+. Miller 10, Nehemiah G. Ordway 3, Frank
lin Palmer 4. Charles Gregory 2, Alexander
Hughes 8, Alburtus McGillivray 2.
Henry F.. Miller IL. John II. Worst l.,
John Miller IL, n. G. Ordway !, Alburtus
McGillivray 8, Alex. Hughes 2, Frank Pal
mer 4, H. u. Hurley l, Charles Gregory 2.
&. II. Walsh 2, Charles Gregory 2, n. d.
Hurley 8, f. p. Day 2, N. G. Ordway 2, A
Mc(iillivray 5, Worst 8, II. F. Miller Z, F.
Palmer +. j. Miller IL.