Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1893-11-18
THE GAZETTE WORTH TEXAS sArUADAY N0IMBER ~ 1888
The TABLES TURNED.
A Motion WIN be Prepared Against
Patrick ON the Charge of Murder.

Special to the Gazette.
Galveston, Tex, Nov. 17,-rho following
clinton. which explains itself, was iiled to-
dny By United States District Attorney r..
r. Hanney, in the circuit court Of the
! United States for the Eastern district OF
Texas sitting at Galveston:
THE u. S. VS.. a. r. PATRICK.
TO the Honorable Alex Boarmau, Judge;
In accordance With the suggestion OF this
honorable court, made and entered on the
10th day Of November Of record. wherein
the court found that Albert y. Patrick, a
practicing attorney OF this court, had on
tho lth day OF November, 1893, filed In
this court charges preferred by him rs re-
lntor and amicus curue against ~ Y. Hutch-
eson. practicing attorney for this court,
which charge this honorable court found
wholly unfoundod and unsupported after
full inquiry, and the court further found
that said charges were presented by said
Albert II, Patrick under gulse that he was
a friend OF the court and without fee or
other motive than from the high moral and
disinterested purpose Of purgtng the bar
Of a dishonorable AM unworthy member
And on interrogatory from tho court at
tho time the motion was set for hearing
the said Patrick expressly stated that he
had no fee or retention TO move against
said j. 9. Hutchosou nor was he moved by
any malice or Other improper motive; aud
Whereas, the court after hearing evil
dence was OF the opinion and did find and
adJudue that IN said answer Of said Albert
a Patrick he did not disclose truth TO this
court, but the court found in the following
language. And Il further appearing to
the court that the recitation In said motion
made by said Albert \. Patalck that he APP
pcarol rs amicus curae and that his an
swer TO the Interrogation Of the court that
al aHHaHH. Nua N..aH
estcd In the presentation OF said motion
than as a friend OF the court aud as dis
Interested member Of tho bar, Is not true
IN fnct, Lu ~ appearing TO this court that
said Albert T. Patrick was in truth and Ia
fact hired and employed TO present the
said charges. II Is therefore suggested by
this court that the district attorney Of the
United States do prepare and present
against said Albert n. Patrick u motion
charging him with fraudulent and dishou-
urnble conduct and malpractice In thus
misleading this court In regard to his rela-
ton and motives in the prosecution of said
unjust charges, now
therefore, do present that said Albert
II. Patrick was and Is guilty Of fraudulent
aud dishonorabc conduct and malpractice
In thus decciying and misleading the court
Ia regard TO his relation and motives In the
presentation OF said unjust charges In Ian
guuge quoted from the decree as hereinhe-
fore stated
That said Albert 4. Patrick was hired
and employed 10 present aud prosecute
said motion to disbar j. G., lIutchcs0u, not
wthstnnding lie stated 10 the contrary
that said Patrick was nctuatcd by hatred
malice and hope OF reward and not as
amicus curae, that the said Albert y. Pat
rick be- cited TO show cause on sech charges
80 presented why he should not be dis
barred and stricken from the rolls Of this
court and his license to practice herein re
volied as provided I'm articles 92S 10 ~ of
the O Used Statutes Of the state Of Texas
Attorney Hauuey said the trial OF Pat.
rick for disbarment would not rome mp
for hearing At the present term OF the
court, which would adjourn tomorrow, hut
would be heard during the February term,
whom Patrick would be given ample oppor-
tuuity TO show cause why he should not
be disburred for malpractice.