Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1893-01-15
rHeLEeAL LOG
Proceedings In tho Various Courts A 81
Suit Filed -Nolice.
snyENrEENTm pIsTRIcr.

SEVENTEENTH DISTRICT.
Judge Harris of the Seventeenth dis
trlct court disposed of the followifg cases
yesterday
George Il. Dickinson Paper company
vs. the Mail Publishing company, suit
for debt Judgment given pluintin In
the sum of SnO2oI.
field, slit for divorce. Divorce granted
The balance of the day was tnkon mp
with the liprgroyo habcns corpus trial.
FORTY-ElGHrH DISTRICT
IN this court the suit of the Durham
Buckley company against the Randall
Chambers company WIS concluded, the
jury hndihg hr hlvdr Of The defendants,
The suit of Potter n Mrghtington ~.
j. H. Brown, for debt, was transferred
90 the Seventeenth district court, the
judge being disqualified
COUNTY COURT.
Judge johnson disposed of the follow.
ing cuseR yesterday
State W. 1'om Payne. aggravated as
sault Plea of guilty and fine Of $50
State Vs. Richard ll0rt. two cnscs of
theft. ploa of guilty and fne Of $40
aud one hour IN the county jail Ia each
la case Of the state vs.. u. H. IInwloy
charged with aggravated asnulr OK
captions were filed.
State W. w. a Flowers, cursing In.
dictmcni dunshod.
State w. r. Il. iinwley, aggravated
nssudt; a. a late hour tie jury had not
returned a verdict
NEW SUITS FILED.
Western Securities company VA. j.
I O. Wright suit on prOmisaory notes TO
[ the amount OF BilOuJ and iOrecos-
y IN al a.
! Moor survey
/ me slochie supply aud Construction
4 company pplnpOspd OF A. j. Anderson
/ and j. y. llnrroll filed suit yesterday
! against the Fort Worth Loan and ton-
Rtruclinn company, William Butler, trus-
I toe, for Grace simpson the Pcusylyanln
/ Mutml life Insurance company II. Is.
/ Buck. s. r. Noshitt, Edward q Bissell,
| Margaret Mangilliyomy, Willis POST
/ George q Harris. q. w. Roark, a. 9,
/ Blnnd. A A. Bridges, Jonathan Leach,
| lGiln Evans Geo. l.. Hurley. Ihomns
Leach Fort Worth street Hallway com
pany, the Merchants national hank, a.
y. March, Y. ~ liamsdell, A. y March,
trustee, and the Fort Worth improvement
company II rs alleged that on Dec.
81. 1900 the Fort Worth Loan and
| Construction company was indehted 60
plaintiff In the sum Of N2}JO4D Tor
goods material. labor, etc, furnished TX
plninih, inr which the Fort Worm Loan
ana CONSERVATION company became lia-
be Thut on tho same date, the Fort
Worth Loan and Construction company,
by deed, delivered 20 the Fort Worth So.
curity company, all property, both real
and personal belonging 20 u, and that,
as part ~ such consideration il assumed
mad promised 10 pny The following sums
Of motley owing by the Fort Worth Loan
and Construction company; One note Tor
1000: Que note for 10000 two notes
f0f 5000 each; one note for
StOGGT, two notes for %fD; one
one half ~ note for SlHbDOi one
note fm $1,000; ope-sey0ntll Of notes ior
$40, 80. threo notes for Ss5llW each,
two notes for SsiO6 O6 one twentieth
of S202383, the balance unpaid on d note
Of SiODJO one note FOR ll,AlV; one note
FOR SlI,04s; on bills payable und dne me
Fort Worth Loan and N1asltucuQn ennl-
pany amounting 10 SlO5,1i3.l4 and TID
liy7 80. and the Indebtedness Of the Fort
Worth Loan and Construction company
10 the Merchants National bank amount
iug TO SlO0.OOO.
il IA further alleged ihnt ot the date
OF said conveyance $23Jvao was OWNS