Arizona weekly journal-miner., 1893-06-14
6uALI7Y oEi Inr MINn.
Tas Maa whoss I've Brains Are Eaus
 Ka ehs Napoleon of I.afe.

Tas Han Whoeo I've urafns Are Equa
 Ks che Napoleon of Iafs.
 Duality of the mind in it's marked
 character is ever before us; there il
 not single work of imagination DOT
 traying human character in which
 the duality is not exemplified. Fic-
 tlonist and poet live upon 1t, and
 noticed recently that one of the most
 analytical and realistic writers of
 fiction in France, and one of the most
 popular, N. Guyot. recognizes not
 only the art but the science of the method.
 In describing one of his imaginary characters. or more probably a real character transformed from the or dinary daily life into his pages under 6 false name, he explains duality on tho same principle that wigan did long before him. He is dealing with man who has two brains brains which are not of the same mold, and therefore not of the same astion-- and he writes his character from this standpoint with ell the vigor of master tn literature and the precision of c man of science.
 Wigan was of opinion that no nngle person has the two brains exactly bal anced He considered the most power ful mind was that in which the two brains, both being healthg. were near est to each other in capacity. But he believed that that was also e good condition in which one brain took the leading part, and in which the other brain, in accord with the stronger, lent the stronger its assistance. A mind sustained in this manner was strong for endurance and one that was able to undertake, with certainty of successful work, the most difficult and hazardous labors. The minds of men like Cromwell, Washington, Wellington, Franklin, would be Of this last named cast, while the minds of the giants of intellect, of Napoleon. Newton, Columbus, would be con structed on two brains of equal pow CT, both in unison in their capacity and will for action.
 In common life the two brains set together with sufficient unity to maintain the mind in a fairly bal anced state, but there are conditions in which the divergence is so consid. erSble that balance is broken, and | then there is what we call insanity. i Wigan sums up the argument in a very clear manner. He says: Il think it may be assumed without risk of contradiction that the fact of each brain being perfect aud com plete instrument of thought is abun- dantly proved. That each, while in health, corresponds in action with it's fellow is obvious from the fact that this unison and correspondence give only one result, as in the case of two eyes producing single visj1n; that when from any cause one brain is disordered a discrepancy in the two processes of thinking takes place. that the healthy brain aid cd by the action of such of the orrans of its fellow as are not affected by the disorder which disturbs the oth- ers) can in nearly 999 cases in l,0O0. according to the usual proportion in this country, control all manifesto dons of morbid emotion or iudg, ment, but that the thousandth case Is the madman."
 
 The balance Is sufficiently pre- served on the grand scale ts prevent he intrusion into the world of an sxcess of insanity. At the same time here is a wide range of diversion. hort of obvious destruction of bal lnce Heredty here plays leading part-Dr. Richardson in Asclepiad.