Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1893-05-14
LEGAL MATTERS.
A BIG BATCH OF GASES Dis
POSED OF BY JUDGE GREENE
Of the foriy.Eiuhih District Court sunds,
Law Violations Action Of The County
Commissioners.

Foriy-eishth dlstrict--rhe following
gases were continued yesterday:
h. B. Paddock vs.. j. l.. Cooper
e al. debt and foreclosure; John
~ Goodfellow vs.. the North British
Mercantile Insurance company. suit on
policy; w. +. Mcl'adden a Son vs. j.
>. Goodwin, TO cancel deed aud fore
closure; Minnie Iuneman VS. Texas and
tncihc Railroad company, damages; Jos
Meyer vs.. l.. Schubert. debt and fore
closure, NJ. q. Ellis VS.. A. j. Bycrs,
defendant, and F. w. Cain, garnishee,
vs.. u. l., Schubert. L. IL. Jefferson. gar
nishee, same, vs.. same. defendant, A.
SALISBURY. garnishee; Sarah Weis VS..
Max Wees. divorce; j. NJ Lyon VS. j. H.
Lyon, divorce; Joe Synder VS.. Maggie
Snyder. divorce; Chas. Kiendon VS. Jane
hlendoh, divorce; Western Mortgage
and lnvestmtcit company vs. i. NJ.
Marble ct al, debt aud foreclosure; Jno.
Russell vs. Maud Russell. divorce; &,
w. Baker vs., j. NJ. Rodgers. debt and
foreclosure; II. w. Prpyine vs. A. j.
Dlxon, trespass; Western Mortgage and
Investment company vs. +. NJ. Mullins
et al, debt and foreclosure, same plain
I'M vs.. =. N. Reilly. debt and foreclos-
nre; q. II. Mcl'adden a Bro, VS.. Hous-
ton and Texas Central Railroad com
hany' DAMAGES; T. Il. Daggett VS.. Pau
me hloppner, trespass; Massachusetts
Mutual Life Insurance compnny rs, i i.
Wellington. debt aud foreclosure. An
nu VI. Nichols VS. l. n Brown OF nj
debt and foreclosure: Texas Brewing
company VS.. j. L. Morton a. Co. dam
ages Albert Ashhy vs. p. p Maddox
vs.. Pheonix 4 Brooklyn, rarnishment.
Scott Wilson. trustee, vs.. Artesian lee 20
OF Hart ford garnishee; Laura Ann Ha-
ley ct al, vs.. James Myrick al nj mar
tiuon; j., II. Barry vs.. unknown heirs of
II. 4. Platt et al; Geo. HALEY ct al.
" X. {; Woodall ct al. debt and fore
closure; Western Securities company VS..
y. W. lrOyine ct al., debt and foreclos-
ure; John II. Robertson vs. Emma ROD
ertson, divorce: Annie Boone VS.. Moran
Boone. divorce; Lotion X Harrison vs..
L. A. Knight ct al, debt and forerlns.
ure; A. A. Ryan VS.. Wilmouth RYAN.
dlNoree; T. NJ. Waters vs.. G. +. Black
e. al, injunction; Laura Colbert VS.. III.
lis Colbert, divorce Sue u. Collins W.
the Dickinson Cattle company Il al.
debt; sam Hunter vs.. Thos. Ilirk ct nl.'
anmages; H. n. II. Parker vs.. Peter
boehn ct A. trespass; :. H. Cantey vs.
Josephine Is. Shaw, trespass; $. Strauss
20 vs. :, n. Darnell, debt aud at.
tional bank vs., Il. Baunnn, debt and
attachment; Lydia Hnrt vs.. Robert Hart,
divorce; \, II. Andrews x 20 VS., /,
Is. lmboden; Mrs. Lee Fox VS.. Frank
The folioD,ins, ooso., ,,.a
In other wnys. '"ios nere uisposeu OIL
Ia 4 Tnr';,Si ilYnalnal fowel VS..
Judgment nv dsfault,' n aha i2regi9,ure'
H. A., Tunnel, debt and foreclosure.
the Sn,,thve"ta,., 'oi H. parlett ~ AZ W.
same disnosi,inr. 5 mol c3nipany' dent
Wortb Grocar ,o,',,i, u iTpoW ". fort
n,issed. ua,.r;s thy' INJUNCTION; dis'
erlck. deht ma fnrarioe,,nn' T.. IN. frei-
default for niainti,y, In,, JuusInent by
AM nt al OuI, sssocitlon VS.. Jas. A.
ment for n,asntie e." ioti'loSure, }udgc
Con',n,,,s, " I, NnIuhtl baiks of