The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1893-07-16

| faatimOny horne toy mo IN lTpIhnQ 7 ntnr
! Coercion as to whit I relieved in 1883 and
ihs Yntionalst~ mSysm 81 rnrgianTed Sad
tho British domination in Ireland Mr. rarno
.ho bringing Of this "sginsh Sys scspsg
rooms GGsaplcat y, IG NJ ,G four ~ , ys$r;
elected elected to Tx tho date Of her nrst knowIcdsS y
my exstcnrc. would be int igiolc. Docs i
false nd fraudulent suit ard ur"n the impu.
tation to me Of the sn'hnrshih OF c"rtain icy.
not say whe'hor they we're written 10 French
or in English y ns sn,Icient blast i"reyet
hs design 4, bast fore"s III" char%r
o. tho oracle Of tho Cnioonists" tho writer Of
ireland Under Coc'"l""''
What is tho difference a. to relevancy and
obvious intent between the bringing Of the
evidences" Of this Lodging house keeper into
Cave il. April. 1901. and tho introduction ~
you. In June. 1902, int a speech os,ensibly IN.
Prevention To change n long esta bished rue
OF your courts. OF tho allegation that some
deseribcd me as as a man Of "fathomicss AMI
measurSlSs: turn,tu'lew Does not It, clcatly
r ts G5s.d q so n
cidents Of lhis neiarion. hu ., ant comet
the in hrr ny tie r. &
want libel put into circuintion by "A Lord
Chief Justice OF England In June. 1852?
The evidence Of the lodging house keeper
was introduced into the court In APRIL 1874.
sud lenly and with an air Of i-conccalcd o.
' was under IN err crosse ss.examinatSn He " evt.
IDENTIFY. expected It 20 surprlse and to dis
s spssa though Sope %ou "neS have S
disconnected me-, as | was standing on
as sn %n OF Witch rTh and ss H
or two before at my own house. was booking
t3r notes or mcmor1nd" IN the handMr,'ns OF
ENGLAND In the early sum mer Of lss3. In tins
friend Of mino since that time a member %
your Parliament, whom he supposed t. pos
half OF n. lady, who had written as he said
poyel and wished hi, It To- an u,d in FL, Ensama;
Of friends whom 1 did not wish to drag
bs ssn, @s. wd q ~ S
counsel OF this plaintiff. But. as 1t HAPPENS.
one q Names n was the Of my As
suite OF rooms in st. James's place had been
eSns.geG for me 6ei y landed in GngHnL n
in New fori and at washington. ''' 'VS'''"''
denly and with some obvious emphasis put to
me y question as to my occupancy OF rooms in
ward . man who proved to be the loleing-
house keeper who let me those rooms. he i'm
me this letter written to me BY Wllfrei Murray
M A. sst Il was hT9 3S MtTsd Mtsay
sci Of this plaintiff concerning himself in 1891
about rooms occupied by me in 1887. at
this plaintiff. but when WilfreI Murray ~
was sending me from America letter de-
James, place. My interest in this this. curious III o
and unexpected incident was not diminished
when my lodging house keeper OF 1888. whom
to the best OF knowledge and belief [ had
never seen or heard Of SINCE the year 1874 in
Murray came to me in London seeking EN-:
ployment 10 connection with the attitude of
S % in the
forward in the court to tell hi. tale of the hooks
and ensrayings which he said he had INSPECT
TIE ethics q literature and Of art with
Justice Cave. BY the name which you bearyou
Of literature and Of art: and you are not likely
to affect ignorance Of the act that the cabi-
philists are not always Intended for casual in
;pection by inQuisitiv. lodging house-keepers
his lodging house keeper .protessed to
s4s and i ,h Sd S Sss BEEN S.sssss
II the most scrupulously reserved literary
n o. the most r s
would have been the relevancy OF this "evi-
fence" to the civil! case Of an alleged breach Of
promise OF marriage. then in 1891 pending
before Mr. Justice Cave:
Why was, this .".eyidence" thrust into this
this M wred Trrny was fo mt
very real person-and il Wilfred Murray had
ion; the DEVELOPMENT. and the presentation Of
he false ind fraudulent case OF this plaintifS
ccurred to mo al once Whs%n ut his od Ehsn
rouse Keeper came forward in'o the court:
N a. upon 20 these Iuestions good dee! Of light:
{ public justice in your conntry. might ere
ms have been thrown through my researches
ord Chief Justice Of England. in your capac-
y y, as zenous partisan Peer OF Parliament,
nd June. 1891. to protect the piaintiir in tits
erned with her. against all prose cution. either
r. GfS p spS or for foul conspiracy"
did not at first recognize this lodging.house
eeper. whom. as nave said. had not seen
ecoIlec,ed that the American friend who had
, mGaged linz my rooms fer me- and who is
on IN 1883. to use " my rooms. INV Wo had had
as a GOOD deal Of bipiiophiiist. .'p possbys
@, TaaSs snd r ss
'ctors and amateurs. and not perhaps likely
be regarded with approval either hy a
~ sua, .oug ing mousse Keeper or by the rounsc!
ritish Jury the fals So and fraudulent suit OF a
'rsMorn and hlackmailing plaintiff. 1t vas
10 intention OF my American friend that after
e death these, books and enGravings with
her things which no valued should pass.
,me OF them into my possession and some
he had lived on terms OF close and Ia
iiar friendship with both Of US. and who is
,servedly held in high esteem and honor by
who know him on both sides OF the Atlantic
was obvious to me ut once that the books
I'd engravings concerning which this .eyi-
,nee" was produced in the cnurt in APRIL
s'l. might haye been the property Of my
oms for safe keeping and subjected to IN
,ertIon there by this lodging house keeper
ider an access perhaps. Ut enlightened but
rtninly Of somewhat irregular curiosity
MS; With the pe,nisson Of Mr. Justice Gave.
Q same time either TO rccocnize nmy
sht In the plaintiffs counsel 10 ques-
y ,t,, me on the subject or TO mako
lbllc the name Of any friend OF mine
connection with II. 1t ia due TO Mr. Justice