The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1893-10-08

upayowed resons OF their own to forget It. that
not rem rsmemSer. but do that when Mr. crave
rGss g TSnaop since ' Pas nSd' s
ms ess y the csndor and the Common sggse
re- STsT Tssi Is. h
my Ss q 3sd MStl.GS Ga
order to pave the. way for his future perform.
pSS blank Sss SA TSms nay I TGo
bands acGnSss!aat1snee as WilJrod Murray in an
tbis srIant dea coud moi be Induced t to SS,
plain on whose suggestion i can have been
scene OF her romance In q London omnibus in
1887, actually brought Int court lodging
mg sps Island IL connection With eGs as
s: 4 ,ssi SsS FsP Az
for S my husband again in London Such an
az spish Happen to have found among my hns:.
laS sa scs a. @ TS% % Il T;
SssSS T sSsst fSssn sSSsed
Il behalf Ra q lady tirIsna Of hi. VII:
have found a; note from this English friond,
h 1855 N iii. to 1os as'sd
having been much bored by people Ia tho
United States yh,oso b names even he hnd
n For * efer nq sSss
not note be ssys Tss ssnt h% Is
rG h Ta bad 9o
and "a non. esistent ehantem's this Wired
very ay'e euro sH drsnt tines H ana paS Ss
wsa @ hears ssFr An d
the cuokoos who have gone about, chmorine
prseissy Why ' %S Rasband d should fGs e as
10 SannO Ena
ISL r. buns with him In order That he may ma;
r. asi .s sas y M.ea Anrss sHiss
black mailer and consplrator into penal SER
W4ers aid these cnctoos get their cry? No,
q sd &aray 81 wa nS t.ts
sss ssaSa Hs %aay sSS s SSS
were one person. after the existence OF Roll
land was proved By two unimpeachable wit
they We're both Identical with my Rusbanil TRs
SnSx9os got tas 9ry s9% and
a LONDON morning paper. since then convicted
before the House Of Commons Of first making
false reports Of the pToessdings in Parliament
false reports. It has been kept up, us we have
reason to know. since then. not only by mere
and o. @ their bach biting q different time.
SnS 70 as Sre sy
NAV be interesting and useful.
am afraid am o .Ts your eqPSSrss
Ss II ehe yaS sy Ssns
to tei p the trnth which he had fspea t
called upon her to tell. finds her name abused
a1dy .sas e. Hnd pshs
therefore. you will let me add that Of tho &C:
s snd q nba tss iegS Ma
ray, In foul conspiracy against my
h1sbaHd and ny hSns my husband M:
lawyers" have much interesting .eyidoncel in
the shape Of large number, OF letters re.
sSss. S Nav q Y them y bsn at
i've The rss
week after the fnal rejection Of the appeal Of
tss IL in 5gni s seP na Rs
somstimes from ENGLAND: sat always L
fhs% IL ms husssna tioass
ana eGi% st dssassd ' Ths
tenor Of them all is proposition for money TO
ss Paid sas the T with s Of
biz" las we have sometimes answered him by
az h seas asRSi
az the societe Generate in Paris, lho Eindiy T
given through a mysterious friend. to whom
he has more than once alluded by name. From
time to time these letters haze contained
more or less prominent persons l mention
this correspondence, Il 1t can be SO called! 70
phantom" may sometimes have;
Il may also serve to show you that Wiltred
such a deiiberateiy misieadinR oiamor H about
him. very well knows that he hes to protect
himself not only against the researches Of the
OF his own oonfederates.
>, A DISTINGUISHED political friend OF Londo7
Truth and OF the Liberal party, whose name
as e %ea
such circumstances he has only to change his
some happy accident, This Is no doubt trus
9ths5s besides Wfred MSrray were
band. aud Wiifred Murray evdant as' thinks 1
better. Il possible that he should sell out hi,
ont BY, them. It may be assumed. too. that
wilfred Murray we'll understands the >, vail q:
estraordtnarS proeeedIngs ' 30 Which 81 Lord
Coleridge has made 1t Impossible for any
man OF sense and Of honor to expect that ny
subject. will seek exoneratioh. from such Q
charge AS that made by the, public prosecutor "a
rom any English tribunal under the cond r.
lions Of Enellsh l lay. Lord Colerldge having
sintes against English law. why should not
M n,s Murray make HerChaIdise Of MS s 20,
him to know that no evidence of mine and h
40 n EVIDENCE Of ny husband would be al;
and his associates In peril Had my cyl cyl,
1enco been admitted BY the Judge, who
30 loudly clamored for 1t. until appeared 10
court demanding my right 10 give 1t, It might
ave been rather iDconyenient for Wired
Murray to specify where he was. for HNamIie ii
~ certain days In 1887. as to which days he
,laintin Swore that my husband, under ne
lame OF Wilfred Murray. was with her on the
ointment having in my possession now
elegrRm from my husband to me. dated ana
'tamped ut very different and far distant
,laee ~ response to kilograms there received
~ him from mo on one OF those days concern.
ne some Important south American business
bout which. as knew, he went to this dlue''
mt aud far distant place at that time.
Perhaps the clairvoyant scribe who evolved
rom Mr.. Marion Crawford's testimony about