People's voice. [volume] (Wellington, Sumner County, Kansas) 1890-1917, 1893-06-16
AN HONEST DOLLARS WORTH.


ported as rendering the following
statement:
THE answer to your question de-
ponds largely on what you mean by
the free coinage of silver. If you mean
the policy urged by many, under which
the government Of the United States
would be compelled by law to receive
IS cents worth of silver bullion
when presented by the owner, and
coin it at the expense of all the people
of the country, and compel the people
by law to receive the coin as the equiv
alent to 100 cents, my answer is that |
am not now and never have been in
favor of it | stand now where my Ia
mented predecessor Mr.. Beck, and I
stood together in 1878, when the So
Jailed 'Bland-Allison bill" was passed
by congress, under which the
secretary of the treasury was
required to purchase and coin
monthly not less than 100000 nor
more than S4,OOO.O0O worth of silver
bullion. When that, bill passed the
house Of representatives, it provided for
the free and unlimited coinage of the
silver dollar, but after it went to the
senate Mr. Beck offered an amendment
which provided that the secretary of
the treasury should purchase at the
market price each month not less than
$4,000. coo worth of silver bullion, or as
much more as could be coined at the
mint. the seigniOrage to be passed into
the treasury, and whenever the bullion
could not be purchased at less than par
with legal tender notes any owner of
silver bullion might deposit it for coin
age on the same terms as gold was de-
posted. Ny position upon this
subject is BRIEFLY this: am
opposed to free coinage of gold
or silver but in favor of unlimited coin
age of both metals upon terms Of exact
equality. No discrimination should be
made in favor of one against the other,
nor should any discrimination be made
in favor of the holders of either gold or
silver bullion, as against the great body
of people who own other kinds Of prop
erty. | believe that gold and silver
bullion should be treated exactls alike
in the minis of the United States: and
that is a dollars worth of gold should
be coined into gold dollar and a dol
lars worth of silver should be coined
into a silver dollar, and if no charge is
made for the coinage OF one, then no
charge should be made for the coinage
of the other"
Upon a first perusal of Mr. Carlisle's
reported utterances, one is impressed
with the idea that he is in favor of I'M
restricted coinage, of the old-fashioned
sort, of both metals, upon the ratio in
use for about eighty years, IS to l. But
upon a second reading of the foregoing
language, the fact is revealed that the
sense in which it is intended to be I'M
derstood depends upon the construction
placed by Mr.. Carlisle upon the phrase
"a dollars worth" And yet there are
sentences in Mr.. Carlisle's statement
which seem to warrant the conclusion
that he favors the demonstration of
both gold and silver. as, for instance.
Nor should any discrimination be
made in favor Of the holders Of either
gold or silver bullion, as against the
great body Of people who own other
kinds of property" 1t is patent to
every thinking mind that so long as
any given quantity of gold or silver, or
both metals is declared by law to con-
stitute or be worth" a dollar, while
there is no law which determines the
quantities of other products which shall
be worth" dollar. there is an unfair
discrimination made in favor of the
holders of gold and silver bullion and
against the holders of all other products
of labor.
Again: When Mr.. Carlisle says that
he is in favor of unlimited coinage of
both metals upon terms of exact equal
ity" and that "nodiScrimination should
be made in favor of one against the
other, it would appear that he is all
that the most ardent and Jealous silver
man could wish. And no other con-
struction could be given to his Ian
guage, but-from the fact that he says
"a dollars worth of gold should be
coined into a gold dollar and a dollars
worth of silver should be coined into a
silver dollar"
And now the burning question is
this: How does Mr. Carlisle propose to
ascertain how much gold or silver con-
stitute "a dollars worth?'
If he proposes, as his language seems
to indicate in the first paragraph of his
statement, that 25.S grains of standard
gold shall continue to be made worth a
dollar by law and that silver as a COM
modify without any legal value, shall
be measured by gold possessing an
arbitrary and artificial value, impaired
by law, then his plan proposes no re-
lief to the people and is a parody upon
justice and common sense.
There is a gross discrimination made
in favor Of gold and against silver, SC
long as the total product of gold, not re-
quired for use in the arts, is given a Ger.
tain fixed monetary or coinage value
by law. while silver is demonetized and
made to depend for its value upon the
demand for it for use as commodity
in the arts.
Either the law must say that some
certain quantity of both gold and silver
shall be dollars worth" or else the
law must let both metals alone and lei
them stand upon their own merits. In
no other way can gold and silver be
treated exactly alike in the minis Of