The times. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1890-1903, 1893-03-04
Justice Johns Court.

ushsred before the Justice there was
pleasant smile seen TO light up his coun-
tenance as II he was anticipating big
rush of business. ana a great many cases
were disposed of.
The following is summary Of yester-
days proceedings.
Claude McGhee, William Nelson, Alex.
Lindsay and Thomas Baker all small
negro boys, were arragned for breaking
into and entering in the day time the
market stall and carrying of a box of
oranges. the property of Nirgie Hawkins.
They were all chastised in court by their
parents
Beverly Gregory (colored). for assault
ing and throwing Robert Pegram down
flight of stairs. Dismissed
Norman Johnson {colored), for fighting
and creating a disturbance on the prem
Uses of Beverly Gregory. Dismissed. but
in the case for assaulting and woundlng
the same party with brick he was sent
TO the hustings court.
Mary Smith (colored), disorderly con-
duct. Fined $3.50 and cost.
Lucy Jackson (colored) did on warrant
take, steal and carry off lot Of house
hold goods. the property of John Guy.
Dismissed.
William O'Dyer, drunk on the street.
Fined 81 and cost.
Henry Blake tcolored). fighting in the
street Fined $3.50 and cost.
Martha A. Taylor (coloreO di1 unlaw-
fully curse and abuse Alex Spotwood.
She paid the cost
Alex. Spotwood, for cursing and abusing
Martha A. Taylor. paid the cost.
Ed Carr (colored), drunk. Dismissed.
Same party, charged with stealing and
carrying off one parasol, two towels and
two napkins. the property of George Ives
Held In $500 for six months and sent to
the hustings court.
A. J. Mott and Ed. Edlington, drunk
and disorderly. Fined 81 and cost each.
eMoses Lee (coioredD. suspicious charac-
ter. Held in 500 for thirty days.
Emost Mead and Fred. Gray, for leaving
their teams standing in the street. Fined
81 each.
The following judgments were rendered
from the civil docket:
Benjamin A Ford In favor w. F.
Nial ne '''..'' OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES. q Al
Z. r.. Dean Contested in favor j..
u Wherry. OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES. On
W. j. Gardner In favor Burk Cloth
Ing mouse. Observation-Disclosures. 90
Lewis Thomas in favor y. j. Wynn. 10 90
John Bowers. Jr., in favor +. Wal
teIs & OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES. % 30
Same In favor }. II. Dickerson x Co. y co
Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Com
pany in favor NJ. Sickler. ........ q 90
j. Perkins In favor Danner & Coz. 81 ca
Robert Morton in favor j. l.. Brooks. 4 50
Z. Il. Miller In favor same. .......... 10 90
robert Lewis in favor MIS-. W. q.
burch ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. 25
Henry Nothing in favor same. 373
w. a. Shelton q Co. in favor Whit
tie, Sydnor & C0......................7 "a O3
George Jenkins In favor G. II. Reid. IL 30
L: Il. Pearman in favor NJ. a. V.
fOWerS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. 81
r. j. Kershaw in favor S. Strausc. 40 Is
George a. Moore in favor John
h"tSedF ''..''.'.''.'.'....... Il %
Henry Rupp in favor DR.. George II.
Bright OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES 80 90
CHARLES w. Gardner in favor same. 10 90
George Williams in favor c. A.
sweeney OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES. 8 50
r. l.. Rice in favor Il. J. Gary..... 81
Eva Campbell in favor e. NJ. Noble. 81 43
r. w. Brooks in favor John f. Rag
Idliu OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES. Il 90
Walter r. Lufsey in favor Z. NJ. No
DIE ...f..........,...... 10 90
G. ID. McIndoe in favor A. jennings. u II
X. IL. Flourney in favor DR.. George
a. 1dDer.. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. 3S 80
Jefferson Powers tcontested) In favor
Mrs. l.. Tignor. .................... II 50
DIR. A. l.. Leftwich in favor John Il.
West ........................... % 90
G.. G. Mitchell in favor Harwood
Brothers & Co.................,...... q 10
Same In favor George +. Burch..... IS 50
Mrs. Catherine Dooley in favor
same ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. 70 40
Samuel S. Garter in favor Il. n.
Thomas Observation-Disclosures. Sc 90
Benjamin Houseman IN favor Dr.
l.. e. Bosher. 200
c. G. Wilkinson in favor Roberts &
Hoge ........."..~................... 50 IS
w. A. McGee and X. w. Ivy in
favor w. l.. Walters. &C 80
c. Il. Johnson and G. f. Healy in
favor T. j. Gary Observation-Disclosures. 80 rs