New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1893-09-09


LONG AND ELOQUENT SPEECH FOR
REJE,TIox-rHE VOTE on DI.
VISION 4ls TO H-sCENEs
OUTSIDE THE HOUSE.
london. Sept s-The House OF Lords rejected
N. Home Rule bill tonight by vote Of 4lT
20 IL.
Although II generally understood that the
hill would he rejected tonight. the House did not
Gil I'D Until after the dinner houl. popular IN
.rsst centring i'm the speech Of the Marquis of
Salisbury who not expected 10 rise until
toward midnight In the mean time Bron Halls
bury. Baron ilersciell. Baron Monliswcll and the
Rshep of Rpon had spoken to half empty benches
After O'Clock the scene outside and inside the
House livened up members ard visitors began
.,reamine in. The pecpsses, strangers ANA
diplomatic galleries shOwei few vacant seats.
LAWN SLEEVES IN PLENTY
Consncuou,lv occupying portion of the area
Of the House We're twenty-five bishops attned III
th.iy capaciou. roles with lawn sleeves The
Archbishop of Canterbury, the Bishop OF London,
The Rishop of Oxford and all the notable Church
dignitaries were present Members of the House OF
Commons crowded the accesseS and standing room
.,ound the throne The lobbies held many
,sople that they were impossible until the police
reteived orders 10 clear them.
Optside of the Parliament Houses organized
bands from Conservative worungmen cluos'
snecially formed 10 ncite jubiant demonstra-
tion on the rejection of the Home Kuie DILL ne
.an ~ assemble at 10 O'Clock Some hint of
their intention having reached the Radical work
inrmen's clubs and Irish societies, small detach-
ments of these appeared on the scene. a'
a brawl was feared. the police having been rein
forced. broke up the different groups and kept
them moving Many of the Tony club men,
finding their ovation scheme baked, went away,
and the crowd outside diminished as time passed
without the announcement of DIVISION
The debate in the House reached the acme of
dulness in the Earl OF Morleys maunderlhgs
against the hill Several other peers were on
tho roll 10 speak. but sense OF wearinesG al
fscted them as well as the House generally. 10
Lord Salisbury. sei7ng chance during mo-
mentary pause rose al 1880 O'Clock a'hiu
rapturons cheers, and hecan his speech
LORD sAIIsBURY's CLOSING SPEECH.
Lord Salisbury said he felt that there was some
satisfaction in occupying the position he dld thi'
NJ the last person 10 speak against Home Rule in
the course Of the present session But ai'houg" 1t
was a position of much distinction, il had many
ipconveniences In particular, the ground of de-
hate had already been so fully occupied that there
vss little rev left for him 10 SAY. Throughout
tbe debate one question constantly present in his
mind was Why had the Government introduced
such a hillo On this point tho House had ~
.eived no sufficient enlightenment. Some peers
who had defended the hill had made al spcechr>
without much reference 10 IN" real nature oi
the bill.
The Lord Chancellor. Lord lIcrSch"h had VII
tually told them that he did not gn" prli"V"
with the Government or one subject. In dealing
s.rr-which was an outrage England 20 "nor-
nous and 40 grotcsnIc thar il was sulprI~' tha'
II had ever found place IN proposal cnanating
from resporsibl, tioveri.ment-the Lord Chan
cellor had declared that he not inclined I"
as.ociate himself with desperate a clause, nut
would prefer other arrangement lh"n' III
dealing with the abandonment Of the lsndi'Fu''
the Lord Chancellor hal admitted that Their iate
would nv terrible but said that they had prou.h
il on themselves. Finally. the Lord 'Ancenof
had finished his account Of hls own lntHhec'ua
position by protesting with a Vi2or thoro"2hN
sincere against anybody desiring TO know the real
opinion Of any abict member upon 'aolhe'
bill
HIS RESPECTS TO LORD ROsEhER1
The Secretary for Foreign Affairs u.ori Ros''-
kry) also had avoided the burning sif J'c'' uhuei-
hing the Governments policy. In" PRONE"
which the Foreign Secretary seemed to nave s''
hims.,f 70 solve was how in an hours speech to
avoid giving pledges that might be- ln"onVehien'
in the future: and he had solved the problem with
absolute success daughter The Foreign Sec
retsry had surrounded the dawn Of the history oi
Glsdstope's Home Rule in ss5 with brilliant
atmosphere of legend that would doubtless dt--
ljrht poetic critics in the future. lie had I'M
piled that in 1885 the Conservatives had sud
denly interrupted the current of coerciNe lcsi''s
ton, and had cut the ground from under the iee'
Of the Liberals rendering it Impossible for them
to assume that policy III the future Bu' IN
June 1855 when the division was taken that
terminated the existence Of the then Liberal
Government they had not produced single
CLAUSE revvng or perpetuatng COERCION Dufihg
the short subsequent period IN willch the toh-
servatyes had held Office their intention was an
nounced 10 strengthen the Irish criminal law
Those. therefore. who had professcd change Of
opinion hecause the Conservatives had not been
sufficiently prompt in enforcing the criminal law
had made most miserable excuses.
Much had been said OF the benefits oi autono-
nous government but had there been Tor a cen
tury statesman bold enough 10 propose that an
autonomous colony should send eighty members
TO the Imperial Parliament. representing no III
terest in England, and bound by no responsibility
with respec, 10 the possible application oi tle
ia"s which Parliament passed. Inc d"s"i"''
OF Such position enough 10 SEND man 10
oedlap, How coald they get rid OF Irish qncs
fons in the presence of eighty members seeking
to make themselves marketable wares III negoti'-
sions with the Ministers? Would these men, sent
by Archbishop Walsh, be quiet on questions "i
religion and education?
\ POLICY OF DESPAIR.
What appeared TO SHINE visibly through al
arguments that Home Rule was policy oi
despair. The Liberals had slid You have f'iei
We do not know how to succeed hut we will try