The Hawaiian gazette., 1893-08-01

Skinner d Co. VS.. G.. W. Maefarlane
X Co., Claus Spreckels, garnishee, as
sumpsit. G.. Brown for plaintiffs:
Hatch for garnishee.
Pun Gee VS.. Loo Chez, damage; ap-
peal from district court, Honolulu.
Hartwell for plaintiff; Davidson FOR
neutrality-suspicious..
h. b. Thomas vs.. Capt Anderson.
damage; appeal from district court.
Honolulu. Ashford for plaintiff-ap-
pellant; G. Brown for defendant.
James Campbell vs.. j. +. Bowler,
assumpsit; appeal from district court,
Honolulu. G. Brown for plaintiff:
Creighton for ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.
{. a. Brown vs.. Bulletin Publishing
Co, trespass on the case. Hatch for
plaintiff
Man Hop Co. vs.. Lau Pew, damage:
appeal from district court of Homo
lulu. Davidson for plaintiff: Castle
for defendant-appellant
j. a. Low VS.. J. NJ. Horner, action
on q judgment. Neumann for plain
tiff; e. w. Ashford for defendant.
Tung Huk vs.. Ngao LUX, case.
Hartwell for plaintiff Neumann-
Creighton for defendant.
DAolOp ~ ". vs.. y. T. w lllltlllS ct
al, assumpsit. Hatch for plaintiffs;
Acknowledgement for defendant.
G. a. Brown VS.. Prov. Govt. II. Is,
assumpsit. Hatch for plaintiff; At
torney-General for defendant.
Tong On Jan * Co. VS.. Akvna, alias
Seu San Wal, assumpsit. Hatch for
plaintiffs.
Allen Il Robinson VS.. G.. w. Lin
coin ct al, assumpsit. Hatch for
plaintiff; Kinney for garnishee.
Allen d Robinson VS.. +. H. Red
ward, assumpsit. Hatch for plain
tiff.
Allen & Robinson VS.. G. w. Lin
coin, assumpsit. Hatch for plaintiff.
Thos. Mott VS.. G. L. Gulick, guard
ian, assumpsit. G. w. Ashford for
plaintiff; Kinney for defendant.
E. G. Crick VS.. E. g. Hitchcock,
marshal, damage. Peterson for plain
tiff; Attorney-General for defendant.
t. w. Rawlins vs.. Honolulu Soap
Works Co., damage. G.. Brown for
plaintiff; Hartwell for defendant.
G.. a. p. Gardiner vs.. +. g. Hitch
cock, marshal, damage. Peterson
Creighton for plaintiff; Attorney-Gen-
eral for defendant.
f. Schiefer VS.. Olowalu Sugar Co.,
case. Rosa for plaintiff; Hatch for
defendant.
Thow Choy VS.. E. G.. Hitchcock,
marshal, case; appeal from district
court of Honolulu. Hartwell for
neutrality-suspicious.; Acknowledgement
for defendant.
Lau Chuck VS.. G. +. Hitchcock.
marshal, case; appeal from district
court of Honolulu. Hartwell for
neutrality-suspicious.; Acknowledgement
for defendant.
In re estate of J. f. o. Banning, APP
peal from Cooper, j., in chambers.
Hartwell-Kinney for plaintifEappel
liant; Hatch for the administrators.
JURY WAIVED.
Hawaiian Carriage Manufacturing
Co. VS.. j. Kaiaikawaha ct al, assump-
sit. Creighton for plaintiff; c. Brown
for defendants.
j. M. Raposo VS.. j. J. Fernandez,
possession Of land; appeal
from district court of Honolulu. Ma
COON for plaintitf'appellant.
S. T.. Pierce VS.. E. h. Thomas, as
appeal from district court Of
Honolulu. Creighton for plaintiff.
Thos. Wright VS.. b. f. White, as
appeal from district court Of
Honolulu. Creighton for plaintiff;
Rosa for defendant-appellant.
A. l.. Cron VS.. ]. II. Love, assump-
lit; appeal from district court of Homo
ulu. MagOon for plaintiff; Peterson
or defendant-appellant.
Carl HenOch VS.. Hawaiian govern
nent, assumpsit. Hatch for plain
.iff; Acknowledgement for defendant.
j. and NJ. Padestre vs.. Maria Belica,
lssumpsit; appeal from district court
If Honolulu. KahOOkano for defend
Mary Camacho vs.. j. A. MagoOn,
replevin; appeal from
district court of Honolulu. Defendant
n person.
NJ. w. McChesney & Sons VS.. Chas.
Lind ct all assumpsit; appeal from
district court of Honolulu. Creighton
or plaintiff-appellant; Magoon for
defendants.
z. G. CamarinOs vs.. Chas. Lind et
IL, assumpsit; appeal from district
curt of Honolulu Peterson Creigh-
on for plaintih:appeIlanti MagOon
or defendants.
DIVORCE AND SEPARATION.
Falizarda Cabral vs.. Manuel Cabral.
lagoon for plaintiff; Aehi for defen-
ant.
Alice Davies VS.. VIM. Davies.
for plaintiff; Neumann for
efendant.
Stella Gems VS.. Arthur Gems. A.
I BROWN for Dlaintiff
Ana Momona VS.. Alma Peterson
pr plaintiff.
Mary B. Silva vs.. Frank Silva
iosa for plaintiff; Hartwell for de
sndant.
Anastasia Mcdowell VS.. Arthur Nc
)owall. Magoon for plaintiff.
James Sutherland VS.. Mary Suther
and. Kinney for plaintiff.
George Vessels VS.. Kekahuna IVES
els. Castle for plaintiff.
Walanika, by her father, vs.. KiPu.
:. V. Ashford for plaintiff; Kaulukou
n defendant.
Celestine johnson VS.. Abraham
Ohnson. Kinney for PLAINTIFF Neu-
lann for defendant.
Hail W. VS.. Naval Namailou.
.osa for plaintiff.
Kauimakaole Lazarus vs.. Jos. La