Waterbury evening Democrat., 1893-09-02

statesman. Even the Irish members. in the almost injUNicatiuu of joy over their first victory in the long campaign which for many wears they have been wagng did not forget the tribute due to the aged prime minister in the storm of cheers with which the result was greeted
 MorIey's Brilliant speech.
 The debate which preceded the division was perhaps the most brilliant of the ora toriCal display which the >O days discus sion has produced II ended with one of the most eloquent spccche> from John Morley which the cause of Ireland has in spir,d Replying 10 Colonel Saunderson. he overwhelmed that gentlrnan'> argu- ments by swift jew of the history of lreland's struggle for self government He said that the logic of events. with the proof that nothing can silence the demand of many SrncratiouS of the Irish people. made futile all furt her opposition.
 Does il not come home to the honorable gentleman, exclaimed the speaker in pro phctic climax, that he is fighting for lost cause"
 The words were most imprrsSively ut tered in the silent house. and Colonel Saun- dcr>un. to whom they We're addressed seemed physically to collapse before them. as though giving way to the despair which the sudden revelation brought to him.
 The impression made by Murley's speech was >n great that the division which fol lowed took place amid a eolrmnity quite foreign to the house of commons. The members filed ont into he Hobbies quietly, and cheering over the issue did not com mcncc until they began to return. after the count, when the figures were announced. The cheers on thr government side were eloquent "t many things Loud and long they rang through the chamber of dcStinics of the nation.
 The man [" whom they were largely in ,,.l'tto ~it silent and moti"nlrsS on the treasury Inuch- High in mighty chorus rang h" shouts uf y Irish mrmInrs. Mr Glad~,"u" looked across at the Irish hUrh"~. but moi in recognition of the dem "n~tratlnn. Ilr seemed tn he in deep thought aud net to realize the surround ing
 Ihen Ill" opno~It'on rheered over the --',to,- rr,,mh rt co,cicl' n tL2 fact that he 0rarnrcent n&4loIity was one CT two smaller than was eArec.=d Tke Liberals cEi .1- Irish rar.y took up the cheers .--2.-- -bv- I4tre w~~> much haQdshakinc l--,. -,-rslau. >oI-rat-.atlon, ln1 IL- house ;f >o.1.Il.ons had done with the home rule bill.
 Finality In the Future.
 Justin Mccarthy, leader of the anti-P Par. ncllite>. Was the first speaker He said that when Ireland should get her national par liament il would include tinality in the true sense uf the term. lrishmen so ac crptrd the measure aS a final adjustment of their leading grievance against Grea, Britain.
 In reply tu MT. Mccarthy. Joseph Cham, berluu s.tid: If this bill ever be passed you will have the Irish coming to parlia ment demanding more and more and put ting pressure on ministry after ministry until at last some minister will be found weak enough or base enough to buy the Irish vote by granting final separation The bill iS now about to go to another place Wtprubahly shall never see it again. But whether We see il or not am con vinced that the British people will give the policy embodied in it a deathbluw at the first opportunity offered them' When the time arrived for the vote oL the third reading of the bill. the house di vided, and the result was For the motion 3Ol; against. 261: majority. ;4. Immediate ly after the bill passed the commons the house of lords resumed its sitting and five minutes later the home rule bill passed the first reading.