Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1893-05-17
LEGAL TRIBUNALS.
JUDGE JOHNSON AND THE SUN.
DAY LAW vIoLAToRs
A Hini 10 Attorneys Settling Of The District
Court oocseis--Tho District
Courts.

Forty-eighih District. The following
cases came up before Judge Green yes
H. A. Halbert ct al. vs.. Sarah h
Known q al. Judgement for deiendan
for the laud w controversy.
Joseph Ray vs. Detroit Electrical
works; continued by c1useut
u. J. Chambers ". J b. Farley ct nl.
continued al cost Of plaintiff.
w Anderson ". Fort Worth aud
Denver City Railway company; oontin.
uci by TlaintiH
q. H. McFaddeu & Bro. vs. Ino A.
Martin et al; transferred 10 Seventeenth
district court
+. j. Potts vs. Texas and Pacific Rail.
way company; continued by consent.
W. a. Townsend Us. Texas and Pacific
Railway company. continued by consent
Seventeenth District. Practically moth.
ing was done Ia this court. and after
calling the dpcket Il was adjourned
County COWT.-.Iudge johnson is still
dealing out even banded chunks Of JUS.
lice 20 viOlatoia Of the Sunday laws.
There are five cnses against L.. Wcltman
for selling liquor aud three convictions
have been secur-l. Two more cases will
h. tried. Joe Oppcy was found gnilty
81 selling coal oil on Sunday and paid
80 N7AtiA F@V NAlfl itlNlN lNI Illf UIlNINEf
r, The bonds OF A. q. Reilly. William
Capps and others wep' forfeited ycsier-
day morning. Bonds Of other attorneys
viii he forfeited II the matter is not at
tended 10.
Setting VI the jury civil docket OF the
district court Seventeenth district for
the week beginning May -, lS9a:
MONDAY.
go james smithey vs.. John Barden.
100. John Notation W. j, l.. Tyler
Msh U Sandige vs. g T.. Meade,
o-p Martin Brown company W. w.
NJ Morris
TUESDAY.
IOS5 Te,ns PRINTING. and Ti,ho,,r, ,i,t,,,,
company vs.. John Il. iios, 81 nj
dGi. a. J, Hayes W.. Anderson Cayil.
-ilI Robert McCnrt vs.. w r. Maddox
c,,, '' al;
r. II. r.
WEDNESDAY.
G45G - no, o. n.tt,,,, =, al
Gi0I Tbnmas ami NI,r, '"t 1iu,Ia,' ~ IT.
'''' Tat NINA o,J '" p,cisc ' iLannn W.,
nonv '''''
GT2S l.. IL. Stephens. for use. etc. Va.
- 5. o. Noodle, ct al
UiiO WEI, Boaz Vs. w n. Manchester.
THURSDAY.
looq Do,t1 Nt.t.,,, 81. ft,,.t -.
,i,i. ~ Ill ,.,.,.,,,, ,,N"S ""u ~
bnet " H''i T conPl9yi c.,.,
md Sanip' II Il. rallvy avn Oo''rauo
.u=7p VI ,,,,,a ,vn,,ti,y. Nj
" si lSo R,luS Wor connsaS U.s. North
ds,o ' 1iiy ,'". " or yuRaps e' u" ura.
Jcunigss g nty'"'"'u'S Vs. hsu'
FRIDAY.
rss1 ~ W At..t. ~ - n
''''f ~, " N,cNapuer w. " H. bhR-
0oo, SI,I 4" a.. . ~,
o---' , Sunh 'o'o'i'hn vs. Guy "l hort
i,,ss Nortn' Ut, ~ W..
'-'o p SCIi " rlsE,rn V" f"rt worm
,,,, n'N1E ,MuPihy'
'lla' IL H. Sellers He, vs. Thomas Leach
SATURDAY.
7os3. G. II, snlimon W, j r. HoNie
ttiseSS II 'iEIhgii W.. -, - Nnl s ,r ~
'H9' = - 's"ilnE'"h Vs. d. ~ ier
D.. n,i -, -,
ny "'u'' VI 'ourlip =, ,r>, AVN,
rs IL VI 49,
e.,,t. .r a.. h,u D'slrlot c'egk'
~ SriuhE nl 'hr luty eNll docket 81 the
,u,lil't eoull 'I,9fly-Syighi,in nlstr''p Tor
Wv" N''''"'S 1laS -. ''''
,s-o u c,,t,i' ,.,, c.,.,,.
i4iu' y a. ,uslgk Ns tulI colorado
as, a Nd. santa f. Railway ,S eo%gpay
,o,s and SANTA re Railway company,
, NM n'i'n Nllo NJ. '7'y oil tor' Worm,
WIZ H. K MpItlsuh W.. rorl worm
and New Orleans Railway conn
c,,- EtuN' %,
wv Eugene Terry guard vs. Martin
.,,,.,,.,,,
~ : = ''SDNi
uSlN May Tucker 81 AL vs. n, Ed
wards ci a.
Wln NJ Bowles vs.. W ~ Lake.
WIS =, NJ iarkor ~. Western Union
49,. Telegraph compndS.
ulo.' ftank Cunningham vs. Gulf. Colo
RADIO ana Santa Fc Railway CON.
u6oo W. - Nal ,,,, ~ n.,t.
ct M' ''' " " ''''''
u.,,r.,-,.,r,
49, Whi'NESnAN'
1919. ]. X, Brown vs. Texas aud Pacific
Railway company.
'D2lh W. -. Hall vs.. Y. l.. Twonhly.
~iN David ldelmlrk, W Missouri, Kan
sas aud Texas Railway company
GGi1, Fort Worth Grocer company vs.,
tifilHl H. n Kinney W II u To,s