The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1893-07-16

material for proof must have been consider
sci never got SO far as this
-I !, t hni,.n material for PROOF that Mur5.,
f %Sss have S S'1 nsss sisii
that was myssl the s deiendans f is tbs
na The sS NSs az prN WAS
into this case by the piaintIf Who w"T pf DpGG
TWttiIE i them 70 me. and who sworo that as
wi, With her" for three years, during the whole OF
o%S %o own name @T oW was ho yns
S% ut ws. M Mnss WAS not %rsS MS5rs ~
proof" in the words Of your learned broth.
, Err have been considerable 2"- AS this plain
1850. during which time / had almost lived
NTH her. was known to her only as Wilfrod
,m an5Iray and as all the. correspondence in-
S on the face q i not with me.
Old this plaintiff come into court In April. 1891
without one, particle Of evidence to prove that
! , had eyer Yer, been known to her or to ybody
Mr.. Justice Cave. It is due TO him to say. kept
70 the obviously fdiotic but necessary conteno
,ion OF w the piaintifrs counsel; that Holland
S ,tA q f hSa M And M&nfrss
Murray must be an imaginary pe,son." But
t asrs ea Ia. Ssssn Of your party
; 2is, Of 4 ADfii; issi. q sadas S5tieies
th Obvious Els. an w h6Rsp paIpos SO
By the aoa This obSiaSsy c
Sased and eswidered Counsel rs thse e %iIirei
artiole fSoS an ,mag1 "a person. In this
liberate misstatem ents and malignant inuen-
ss wv Wl. a n ss down hs t s.sd
person."
Why should many Of the auditory" have
been tempted to extlaim. There's no such
person when the name OF wilfred Murray was
name Of Gladys Evelyn n1 was eeatsnly I nos
eanis Of po. .hs p knoM in W The
Of wrsa Sseras ss %as
real personi lrefer to this article merely be-
g cause S 1t ACCURATELY represents the animus and
PIete sympathy with which your action 10 e and
the action OF Mr.. Justice Cave in suddenly and
secretly chanEing then existing rule OF your
would it not be interesting to learn whether
the anonymous writer OF this article OF his
the 9h % xp whe1 B thas W fr
Murray was not the real name OF q real per-
SOM Il he knew this Of his own knowledge,
give you and Mr.. Justice Cave and the plaintiff
and the whole Gladstonan party and press the
under his own name and under his. own ad.
Dress Why did he not come forward with his
and the proofs OF his ..knowl-
interests OF public justice" call upon the Pub
lie Prosecutor to prosecute me. the defendant
as Esa r sSat ln aasTs
t. me by the name OF Wifred, Murray? Is it
and Of private decency and Of the We'll
Of this Kind should ts be- Dc, mads By
II many Of the astonished auditory" in the
' lou OF Mr. }uStce Cave when they first heard
q course they must have been equally
If ROLAND brought before the court As
%sG1 81 last has With yH Se oers well
ofy nanissssd siehsess dsp pc Hf aad to
the Names Of Wired Msrss9 e Mbss
he name Of ROLAND was first brought before
ne court: Widths "a the real existence q a person
!iven by me. the defendant nor so far as am
ware; WARE: was the truth and accuracy Of that tes-
hss plaintiff and BY tie plaintiffs coun-
2now sns a ls' Re ehsssnes evdsnos P per.
mt. who testified that this person Holland was
nc as Wilfred Murray: and BY two other wit
ehsses; one maid servant long IN ny service.
she b AND
he name OF Holland. and by the hall porter Of
well. known London club. who testified to the
,ade by the plaintiffs counsel that Murray
"a, =, holland YOU vii find i. asserted in the
ePresentins the attitude Immediately
political sfsrI Of vh dRis seS' BY
elonG to the world Of fiction. but Tor the posi-.
Are or are not the spirit and the letter OF the
nglis law o. libel eyaded by this ingenious
'lerencs to the positive testimony given be-
use at that moment still under IitieatiopS
vi however this may be, does :" the whole
'al existence was attested not by the de-
ndant only; but BY two independent wit
tSa MeTs ana
ROLAND Gas 1 june m Why has he M neses
! have no intention Of giving you in this let
n any III. and detailed account OF the infor- |
alton which have obtained since this case
as decided in my favor in 1881. as
many Of the most Interesting points con-
r me to assume that ! am addressing this
tier to an upright and impartial Lord Chief
lstice OF England. hon estiy anxious to ascer-
10 the truth and to prom ote the interests Of
lblic Justice" But it Is worth while to lot
~ know that on tho last day of the heafing
this case. my leading counsel, the Attorbey-
I'D. addressed to him at his house In Ken
ngton. from which It would appear that how
er the mention Of the names OF WilfreG Muir
y and OF Roland may have been re- !
lived by an 'astonished auditory" SIT !.
AZ spectral and open-mouthed within Z
Q popnlous Imagination OF an anony-
mes was received in the outward circle OF /
al human beings. inhRbiting London and I
lgland. not only without surprise. bnt as the q
ention OF names fam liar and well known In =
Q subterranean world OF political combina- :
ms. and suDversiye agitation. /
give you here the precise text OF this Gu q
'us missve. The card is addressed: j
Sir II. WEBSTER
H0rntOn LOd0e J.
PIT street
KENsINGToN .
a I,