Mohave County miner., 1893-10-21
District cosr.

A"o "'oH'es couft vi tue touItn JUDICIAL
district in and for Mohave county con.
vened in the court house at 10 o'clock
.. IN. last Monday, Judge Hawkins pre-
siding. A grand jury composed Of the
following citizens was impxDeled: OF.
Kuencer, g. w. Beecner, Phillip Hach.
Chas. Ziemer. w. II. Lake, s. 8. Watson.
g, NJ. Bowers, w. MsRichards, A. Har.
ris, Chas. Lynch, Byron Sherman, Alfred
Yer Mebr, Richard Taggart, Foster 8.
Dennis. John MulIigan, 4. +. Thompson,
U. V. Nj. Gaddis, Croesus Rogers, J. X.
Halsey, John s. Kolar, II. p. Ewing.
The following cases were then called
and disposed Of during the sitting Of the
court Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday
and Friday; 10 the matter Of the estate
OF David S. Terry. deceased, the case was
dismissed; p. +. Collins, plaintiff, vs.
Jas. X. Russell and Chas. Ziemer, de-
fendant, to quiet title, judgment entered
Tor defendant; Rafugio Laguns, plaintiff,
versus Santos Laguna, defendant, d.
voree. continued for the term; PHILIPPE
Rios. plaintiff, vs.. Jesus Bernal Rios, de-
fendant, divorce, continued; NJ. ID. Wells
q CO., plaintiffs, vs.. G. w. Beecher and
Lemuel Augustus Sandersop, defendants,
debt. judgment for plaintiff; A. J. Ma.
son, plaintiff, vs. Kingman Silver Mining
Co., defendant, foreclosure OF lien, con-
tinued; John Howard, plaintiff, vs.. II.
A. Owen, X. Ecklsrton and NJ. Guereu,
defendants, stricken from calendar; VIM.
II. Lake, sheriff and ey-officio tax collec-
tor, plaintiff, vs.. Mohave county. defend
ant, debt, passed; VIM. II. Lake. plain
tif, vs. The Arizona Republican Co,
defendant, libel. compromised; L. o.
Cowan, plaintiff, vs.. Arnold Gold and
Silver Mining Co., defendant, foreclosure
OF lien. demurrer sustained, leave to
amend; the W. III. Taggart Mercantile
Co plaintiff, vs.. w. L. McGee. defend
ant, debt. Judgment for plaintiff; Harley
Fay, plaintiff, vs.. X. T. Root, J. II. Mat
tbews and ii. w. Barry, defendants. con-
tract, continued; r l.. Ayres, plaintiff,
vs.. Western Mining Association and G,
w. Beecher, defendants, foreclosure OF
lien. judgment for plaintiff; John
Howard, plaintiff, vs. II. A. Owen, ct al,
defendants, dismissed; Hester Marven,
plaintiff, vs. Henry Marven, defendant,
divorce. decree granted; p. f. Ceilings.
plaintiff, vs.. Jas. r. Russell and Charles
Ziemer, defendants, judgment for plain
tiff; j. Uncapher. plaintiff, vs.. Garden
Springs Mining Co., defend ant, debt, con-
tinued; The w. II. Tsggart Mercantile
Co., plaintiff, vs T. w. Gallagher, de-
fendant, debt, continued; Mary A. Smith
plaintiff, vs.. James l. Smith, defendant,
divorce, decree granted: Marion l..
Brewer, plaintiff, vs.. Elias l. Brewer, de-
fendant, divorce, decree granted; j. X
Halsey, plaintiff, vs. +. w. Gallagher.
defendants, continued; T. w. Gallagher,
plaintiff, w. William Miller, defendant,
appealed from Justices court, continued (;
Swift & Co a corporation, plaintiffs, vs.
G. w. Beecher and Lemuel Augustus
Sanderson, az partners, doing business
under the firm name OF Beecher & Co.,
defendants, debt, judgment for plaintiff;
Charles Cummings, plaintiff, vs. w. Fl.
Lake, defendant, contract, continued;
g. w. Beecher, plaintiff, vs. w. b. Ste
phens, defendant, debt, dismissed and
settled; the w. H. Tsggsrt Mercantile
Co. vs.. T. w. Gallagher and II. b.
Hanna partners, defendants, debt, con.
tiuued; the w. II. Taggart Mercantile
Co., plaintiff, vs.. n. b. Hanna, defend
ant, debt, judgment for plaintiff; terri
tory Of Arizona vs. Geo. l.. Selsor, appeal
from Justices court, motion for change OF
OF venue denied; crse set for Dec. IA
territory Of Arizona VS. Francisco Arno,
murder, Is years in the penitentiary.
The grand jury found a true bill for
murder against Francisco Arno. who
killed Harry Foulk at Peach Springs
few weeks ago, and ignored the charges
against Geo. l.. Scissor, q. b. Wiseman
and J. VI. Hart, held on charges OF grand
larceny, and the charge against J. W.
Michael for assault. The grand jury ad-
journed yesterday to meet again on Dec.
l4,b. II. p. Ewing was appointed by
that body to inspect the books Of the
board Of supervisors and county officers.
Much dissatisfaction was expressed by
that body with the manner 10 which the
nd xith