Mexico weekly ledger., 1893-05-25

40 Jacob Flora
IL Mary Hoban
AZ j Lakenan
Third Day. Wednesday, June :, 1898
43 School Districts 8, so, l, vs. M C
Flynt ct al
A Claib Bruce VS. R A Potts
45 First National Bank Mexico VS.
Wade and Ringo
46 C H Bruce VS. B F Dobyns ION
motion N IT,
Al O F Clark VS. Jacob Shobe
4S Fannie Talbot ct al VS. Unknown
heirs Margaret Runkle
40 The Esterly FL Machine Co VS. Jno
Criswell
80 II A Ricketts,, ex G II Hardin, VS.
Phil Helwig
81 Mahaley hurry VS. Ed hurry
81 w L McNama VS. NJ B McNama
So w J Morris vs. Emma G Adams
ct al
81 J e. Bassford, appellee, VS. II L
Berry
So City of Mexico, appellee, VS. Chris
Davis
Sc James Kimpson, appellee, VS. Cliff
Lawrence
Fourth Day, Thursday. June 8, 1898.
81 B F Purcell vs. Rufus Hisey
IS Rufus Hisey VS. B + Purcell ct al
SO G T Hook VS. w B McIntire
so w H Benning VS. W I Paul
81 Considine ct al VS. Sloan ct al
50 c c Wilburn VS. Warren Fowle,
appellee
63 R S Steele, appellee, VS. o L Woods
81 City of Mexico, appellant, VS. Geo
Hardisty
IS III Cordner VS. S G Baskin and
Tom Roberts
66 D NJ Anthony VS. w II Beal ct al
81 N F Kilgore, appellee, VS. J A
Nichols
6S City of Mexico, appellant, VS. For
rest Harris 81,
SO Maggie Wilburn, appellee, VI I
Leake
Fifth I ay, Friday, june Q, 1898.
20 John Spotswood vs. Armstrong
II NaLnan Shearer VS. Ben Middle
ton
70 J P Smith, admir- Milton Smith,
VS. Jno NJ Smith
70 G B Twyman VS. w " Johnson
"A S NJ Gilbert ct al VS. Audrain Go
Ann Society
rs James Garrett & Son vs. Audrain
Co A d NJ Society
rs Henry Myers ct al VS. Audrain Co
AN Society
n Lacrosse Lumber Co VS. Audrain
Co A & NJ Society
IS B Helleman & Co vs. Jno T Hisey
70 AFShapleigh ardware company
vs. VIM NJ Pearson
so A S Houston ct al VS. Audrain Co
A & NJ Society
81 G. I Biser VS. o G Willard
50 Thos Hendrix VS. Unknown hiers
of z Goodnight
SO Frank Coatsworth VS. Audrain Co
A & M Society
Sixth Day. Saturday, June 10,
"a John Ibbotson VS. Mexico Fire
Brick Works Co, appellee
SIS CT Toalson, appellee, VS. Chas
Hazard
Sc Adelia Black VS. NJ Y Black
81 VIM Armstrong vs. Mary Stewart
So S Cole VS. P H Cullen ct al
SO A B Tinsley VS. ] E Haley ct al
80 Frank Beck VS. Elmira Bowman ct
81 Isaac Miller vs. Sarah Bell Miller
92 Hamilton Hall VS. VIM g Harrison
SO Southern Bank Mexico VS. Will
and Chas Showers, note
"a Mary E Smith We Green Clay,
note
95 Lille BRhodeman vs. Sam Rhode
se Lizzie Mcdonald VS. Harry Nc
Donald
81 Thos Bozarth vs. E L Tanner ct al
So Florence Wells VS. Geo Wells
Sew NTH Day, Monday. june 1., 1898.
80 CE Thompson admir- VS. ] S Brown
100 Jones, Edwards & Co VS. Forgey
lOl Collins Bros appellants VS. Forgey
l02 ] S Merrill & Co VS. Forgey
103 M III Banks VS. James hurry ct al
1O4 Sarah Tomlinson ct al VI W I
Williams ct al
l05 JHoltet al vs. E C Burkhart ct al
log Bridget Jordan ct al vs. Josh I
Bunton
| 107 Otto Luther VS. ] S Brown
, los Peter Richard kenrick vs. n Sneed
ct al
100 c Gates appellant VS. II P War
den ct al
10 G Barbour appellee vs. J R
Baker
Ill ] R Baker appellant vs. GJ Bar
bour
Eighth Day, Tuesday, June 10, 1898.
II2 John P Harris vs. Wabash railroad
lI3 Z s Mansfield va Wabash railroad
/ il1 y III Va SdIAc5 HCstoa
lis w H Brown admir- vs. r w Ed
monston
1I6 Riverside Publishing Co VS. Rollir
McNama ct al
III Lucy NJ Boder VS. E DWebber ct q
lis Peter Lorens We w r jackson ct a
lie Jos Marshall VS. Lucy Marshal
ITO Thos Turner VS. P Mclaughlin
III State rel ] E jesse coll VS. I'm
known heirs III F Reno
122 State rel ] + Jesse coll vs. s ]