The Valley Virginian. [volume] (Staunton, Va.) 1865-1895, 1893-04-13
Circuit Court Proceedings.
CHANCERY CASES.

Circuit Court Proceedings.
CHANCERY CASES.
Jno Kelly's ex'or VS. Jno Kel1y's legatees
| decree making new parties defendant an6
re committing cause to Com'r Hobbs
W M Brown VS. Swami & Leterman, de
cree confirming commissioners report O
sale and awarding rule against purchaser O
lot
Anderson & Haden, trustees, vs. West Cliff
ton Forge Invest. Co., decree confirming
commissioners report of sale.
Driver VS. West Clifton Forge Invest. Co.,
decree confirming commissioners report
Of sale, giving judgment for balance of pur-
chase money due, and retiring cause from
docket
Byer, Sheriff, &c, vs. Johnson, ex'or &C.,
decree referring cause to com'r Hobbs.
Danlron VS. Jennings ct ais, decree for par
tition of lands.
Armentrout, &c VS. Hayes, &c, decree
awarding rule against S c Agee and w E
Allen.
Allegheny Bank VS. L Jackson, decree
making new parties defendant.
James Heegan VS. West Clifton Forge In
vestment Co, decree confirming sale of lot
and retiring cause from docket.
Clarke's ex'or VS. Boswell's heirs, decree
directing conveyance OF land.
Williamson ct ais VS. Crowle ct ais, decree
directing payment of money by Special Re
ceiver.
NV Anderson vs. West Clifton Forge In
vestment Co., decree confirming commits
sioner's report Of sale, directing conveyance
of lot and disbursement of funds.
Tyree, g'dn, &c vs. Crizer ct ais and Dem
vs. Crizer, decree confirming com'r report Of
sale, awarding writ of possession referring
cause to com'r Delaney and directing dis
burser1ent of hand payment.
NJ Paxton VS. Carpenter &C. decree con-
ir1ning cotn'rs report of sale, directing dis
bursetnent of purchase money and referring
cause to conl'r Delaney.
Dew VS. Green, trustee, SC, decree setting
aside deed and directing re-conveyance o.
| lot
Rouse, Hernpstone & Co. VS. Keyser
ing lein to chancery suit Of Guggenheimer
& CO ct ais VS. Keyser, Simpson & Co ct ais,
and retiring cause from docket
Philips & Bragg VS. West Clifton Forge
Invest. Co, decree confirming sale Of lot and
| directing disbursement of purchase money.
Anderson, trustee, VS. Eaton ct ais, decree
referring cause to Com'r Hobbs, and direct
ing sale of property IN hands of trustee.
Mathews Grocery Co VS. Piewes & Rey-
nolds, &c, decree retiring cause from docket
Duncan VS. Saunders, decree referring
cause to com'r Delaney.
Gillespie vs. Curry ct ais and Alexander
&c VS. Gillispie, decree directing conveyance
oflands
Guggenheimer & Co ct ais VS. eKeyser,
Simpson & Co ct ais, decree referring cause
to com'r Barton.
Rednlan VS. Byers & Bell decree for $So5.75,
| providing for sale of land
Stoves, Marshall & Winfree VS. Keyser,
Simpson & Co, decree certifying lein to
chancery suit Of Guggenheimer & Co ct ais
VS. K S & Co ct ais, and retiring cause from
docket
Skeen vs. Leighton ct ais, decree tor
1896. IS.
Cabell VS. Swami ct ais, decree for S325,
and subjecting lot to payment thereof.
w & I Allen & Co VS. Keyser, Simpson
Co, decree certifying 1ein to chancery suit
of Guggenheiner & Co ct ais VS. K, & Co,
and retiring cause from docket.
Guggenheimer & Co VS. Keyser Simpson
& Co, decree as above.
| A E Huddlestun VS. Howard & Sears, de-
cree confirming co1n'rs report and recon-
hitting cause to co1n'r Hobbs.
Kaylor VS. Simmons, decree retiring cause
! from docket.
Hughes, &c VS. Nicely, decree confirming
com rs report AMI retiring cause from docket.
Traders Bank, of Lynchburg, VS. Swami ct
ais decree for $457.4o and subjecting lot to
payment thereof.
Bowles, for &c VS. Winters ct ais and Kerr
VS. Swami ct ais, decree confirming com'rs
report of sale, directing conveyance Of lots
and referring cause to corn'r Hobbs.
Tyree & Helwing VS. K S & Co, decree GER
tifying lein to chancery suit of G & Co ct ais
,-cp c 81 % of lie or6
docket.
Lockhart &c VS. Rose, decree confirming
com'rs report and providing for sale of land
White VS. Smiths adnr, decree awarding
rule VS. T Smith and sureties.
/ Q L Williams VS. c & o Ry Co, decree re.
ferr1ng cause to com'r Garrett.
Watts VS. Damron &C. decree making new
party defendant and awarding rule against
purchase Of land.
O'Conner VS. Gillepies &c, decree retiring
cause from docket.
Howard < Sears VS. D Y Huddlestun, de
cree confirming conl'rs report and recon-
uniting cause to co1n'r Hobbs.
Elcelsior Stove Pattern Co VS. Whitman and
same VS. Columbus Steel Range Co, decree
confirming com'rs report, directing disposal
of property, and reconlmitting cause to
com'r Delaney.
Chllds VS. Armentrout, decree retiring
cause from docket.
Boswell VS. Boswel's admir- decree con
| firning com rs report of sale directing con-
veyance of lot and recom1nitting cause to
co1n'r Barton.
Keyser's heirs VS. Keyser's ad1nr, &c
Harness &c VS. Paxton's reps; Laynes ad
1nr VS. Holloways ad1nrs; Gardner, Carltor
Y Co VS. Paxton &c; Echols, Bell & Catlett
vs. Gardner, Carlton e Co, decree retiring
cause from docket
Walkup, &c VS. Burks, decree referring
cause to CONS Hobbs.
Huddlestun 4 Richardson VS. Howard &
Sears, decree remandlng to rules
LAW CASES
P II Trout VS. West Clifton Forge Invest
Co, suggestion VS. Bank of Fincast1e, con
tinued.
Chaplin & johnson VS. A J Gillespie, judg't
rendered for def'ts costs.
A 7 Snyder vs. Keyser, Simpson & Co
Judg't rendered III favor Of pltff VS. def fol
$500.
McAllister vs. Fenimore, judgmt for pitt
VS. def for SISI.67.
Partlow vs. Grove verdict in favor of def
set aside, a new trial granted and parties
given to June to file bill of exceptions.
Dickinson VS. Brown verdict in favor o
pltH VS. deft for 500 damages.
A F Withrow Lumber Co VS. Winters
Judgment rendered in favor of pltf VS. def
for $367.6 60.
Rinehard VS. E ] Bird, il, &C., continued
Gov. Nat. Bank VS. E ] Bird Jr, continued
Smith, Courtney & Co VS. E Bird, Jr, &c
demurrer to first count of declaration sus
tanned aud cause continued.
Rich Patch Iron Co vs. A M Stul1, order 0
survey entered.
Same VS. Robt Tridley, order of surve
entered.
w Mann VS. R H Davis, cause disnlisse
agreed.
70 - n II.