Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1893-01-07
GRAND AND PETIT JURORS.
Those Who Will Serve During Tho
February Term Of Court.
yEyiRgs REIuRSABLE on FEB. q
Judge Zane Ovcrrules tho Motion Tor
a new Trial In The Tree
Casc.--Dlytrce.
yEylRrs REfuRSABLE on FEB. 6

when Chief Justice Zane took his
sent on the bench o; the Thiri district
court at 10. O'Clock prompt this morn
ing. CLERK Mcmillan brought 70 the
front the box from which Jurors
names are drawn just previous 10 eacn
farm. The next opens In February,
and the following names were drawn
Of psrs,ns who will serye until us
charged bv hi, honor. The two vcnires
were made returnabio on the o'h o.
February.
GRAND JURY.
l.. II. howell, j. r. Clasby, James
Quinn, J. q. swan, IL. a. Hes, j. j.
rnona,. J. q. Masher, J. +. Brandley,
Il. II Edreigc, l.. q. Whitehead
John e. Cutler, John Conner, Philip
]. stone, J. W. skinner, A. NJ. Wood,
q. r. Smart, Frank Snyder, Heber
smith.
PETIT JURORS.
Frank Carpenter, James Dennis, G..
Il. Lambournc, j. A. Pollack, George
Niulle,t. VIM. Anderson, Nose, Jontp,'
John II. Bailey, Jr., l.. 81. Em crson,
Wm, j. Nrwm,n, Eli Porter, w. Il
Jacobs, VIM. Fuller WIN. j. Burton,
G. o. Farnsworih, Geo. Whemab,
Wm. II. Young, Geo. &. Lambvrl,
Henry Day. IL. G. James, VIM. Ham
il,ou. Farley kimbiil, Isaac a. Clay
ION. Thus. n. Jeremy, +. II. El!eIbcck,
Is. L.. Parker, l.. l.. Sloan, l.. ID.
Kinn,y, George w. Adam, u. W..
Carer.
ovHRRuLED.
In the Gaze Of Joseph II. Smith ct
nj. W., SAT- Lake City,the motion for u
reference Of the cass was overtuied.
DISMISSED.
Territory Of Utah va. Nephi w.
CLAYTON. Same vs.. James Jack. Both
these cases were dismissed on motion
OF the plaintiffs council. These were
cases " very long s,anding-claims
ANAL amounts ON certain tefr'
torlal debt. Co.,
Theunir OF p. II. Young Va. Samuel
Sudbury Of al. was dismissed.
ny CONSENT.
In the cas-, " Frapcia Ffltsch w.
Jennie Holcomb, Le'nult, judgment
wfs rntefei by consent. ~ ten days
ttay was gianled.
NOTION FoR A Skw TRIAL.
Al, Cushing ct nj. vs.. John Beck.
This case came up again on the Defend
ants motion for new trial. 1t was
applied by for Judge Koylc and OPT o.ei
ly Judge Powefr, for the plsin,ih.
This action will be- remembered ne
having occupied long time In hear
ing, and involving no less sum, ON a
contract for trees, than S20,OOO.
The jury, alter u lengthy ueliberation,
found for the plaintiff, assisting the
damages at $4,000, trifl. over half
the am uht sued for. The grounds o.
the pre- sent motion were that the court
dii not charge the jury correctly with
reference TO the measure OF damages,
and secordiy, that his Honor omitted
to properly cite one element by which
II was alleged the contract was pro.
cufed--ffautulen representations.
The arguments occupied along time.
The Judge at the cl0se overruled the
motion, but allowed sixty days TO
enable the defendants counsel TO
perfect IN appeal.
THY KEEP ON COMING.
Emmn Garrett vs.. Frank Garrett
was the titla Of IA divorce suit which
next engaged h'e Honor's attention
for few moments.
me plainlih, "a delicate looking,
neatly dressed young woman, about
- years OF age, was represented by
Attorney Breeze, In the absence OF
Attorney Rognon.
The story told by the I'M
fortunate was the same old Que
OF desertion, failure 10 support, and
bahitual drunkenness. This parties
were married ut Lincoln, Nebraska,
In tho year 1885, and they lived to.
gether about three years; then the
noble Garrett went away and has not
since returned. After they came ~
this city defendant did not live with
his wife more than couple OF months.
From the time Of their marriage the
defendant, who IL n laborer-when he
feels iuclined to work--failed wholly
10 provide for his wife, and was either
drunk or under the iniiurnce OF liquor
three or four times week while tney
resided together.
Corroborstive evidence was given
and the court granted the decree rs
urayeu