The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1893-06-24
FATHER M'eLYNN's FUTURE

He Is on His Way Homa and viii Prob,bl,
se Rs'nstatsd as Pastor Of ST. Ste ohen'..
NEW YORK, June 22,-Much interest
is felt in Catholic circles in this city
concerning DIR. McGlynn's future The
old pastor of st. Stephens church has
been to Rome and Is now on his way
home. His audience with the pope was,
lccording to all accounts, of the most
satisfactory nature and it is expected by
his friends that upon his return he will
be given pastorate in the diocese o!
New York, possibly that of St.stephens
church. Father Duccy, who is one OF
DIR. McGlynn's warmest friends and
supporters, was asked If he had any in.
formation concerning the doctors fut..
ure plans. He said that he had not,
except taat whatever the future of Dr..
NlcGlynn is will hnvc to be settled be.
tween him, Archbishop Satolli and
Archbishop corrgan 'sHe will prob.
ably bring his instructions from
Rome, said Father Ducey, ..and any
further information as to his future
tourse will have to be furnished by
fither Archbishop Corrigan or him!
scif
The trouble between the priest and
Archbishop Corrignn arose in 1886,
when Henry George ran for mayor
against Abram s. Hewitt. DR. Me,
Glynn espoused the cause of Mr.. George
and was one Of his ablest und mosa
earnest supporters. He attended sew
cral public meetings aud warmly advo-
Gated his election. Archbishop Corri-
gan became alarmed it Is said, bci
cause of the views entertained by MR.
George on the land question, but as u
matter of fact he opposed DIR. Me.
Glynn's course for another reason His
sister was the wife of John
Kelly and he was therefore sol
icitous of the fortunes of Tammany
hall. DR.. McGlynn was IL firm
believer in the doctrines cnunciated by
the author of Progress and Poverty" .,
and he had the courage of his convic-
tions. He disregnrtlcd the injunction
OF Archbishop Corrigan prohibiting
him from speaking at Il meeting at
Ehickering hall October 1, 1856. On the
following day he received Il commune
cation from Archbishop Corrigan sus-
pending him from the exercise of his
pricstly functions for ten days. On
November Is DR.. McGlym reitcratea
his belief in the soundness OF the theo-
rics advanced by Mr.. George in an in.
terview in the New York Tribune in
which he asserted that the organiza.
ton OF working women's clubs through.
out the country was inadvisable; that
they were as SO many plasters ona can
Ger; did not strike Mt the root of the
evil. etc. The archbishop the next day
relieved DIR. McGlynn of the admins.
tration of his parish and suspended
him until the end of the year.
On December A Archbishop Corrigan
sent DR.. McGlynn an alleged cable
gram from Rome notifying him that
the authorities ut the vatican desired
his presence there and informed him
subsequently that the suspension would
continue in full force until he received
instructions in the case from Rome.
The Rome authorities subsequently re!
pudiated the cablegram mentioned.
above but on January II, Archbishop
Gor1'jgnn having presented his case to
the :pope AMI DR.. McGlynn remaining
silent the priest was summarily rel
moved from st. Stephens parish DR..
Burtsell undertook to champion tho
cause of his friend and 4 long and bit.
ter controversy was waged between
the supporters of the pastor of st.
Stephens and the adherents of Arci,-
bishop Corrigan, which was finally set.
tied by the restoration of Dir. McGlynn
to all bis priestly functions by Arch.
bishop Satolli on December "a, 1892.