The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1892-01-28
WHo WILL BRooKLrN,s BISHOP he,
An ER0rt 10 he Made 10 HarmonSze Present.
RlyAlriea In That Dlacele.

months mind mass Of requiem for the re-
pose OF tho soul OF the late Bishop Louehlin
was celebrated yesterday morning In old St.
James's Cathedral In BROOKLYN. Archbishop
Corrigan. three Of the lato Bishops brother
prelates and more than U hundred priests par
ticipnted In the services The old church was
crowded.
Bishop Ludden OF Syracuse celebrated the
mass. The Very Rev. Michael May. admlnistra-
tor OF the diocese. was assistant priest; Father
Mcclure Of Long Island City. deacon OF tho
mass: Father Kelly. sut-deacon; Father Bros.
nan. master OF ceremonies: Father McCarron.
assistant master Of ceremonies: Father Ham,
ilton. thurier. and Fathers Cannon and FlSn-
merry. acolytes. Archbishop Corrigan. attended
by Fathers Crowley and Arnold. and Bishop
McNierny OF Albany. sat in the sanctuary.
Bishop O'Farrell Of Trenton delivered the
eulogy He described Bighop Loughlin as .
holy and humble man.
Among the priests who attended the months
mind tonic discussed was. Who will succeed
Bishop LouEhlinp None OF them knew who
the three men on the list sent to Rome BY the
Bishops Of the province are. 1t was the gen
eral opinion that either Bishop OFarrell a
Trenton or Mgr. Mcdonnell. Archbishop Corri-
Gan's Secretary. would be the new Bishop.
mo one outside the Bishops who made up
the list knows the names that are on it." said
one priest. I'VE have good reasons to believe
that the new Bishop will not be Brooklyn
man.; Not long ago an oyerzoalous pastor. 10
iyn priest who Is not on the iist made Up 81
ssstieP q yssfIss $ssdins f? SSSess . tId
Father Mitchell; whc heads the AZ seat g
SHOWN that TT the BrooEiypp d diocese Is divided
into fsotiens, This viii become known 4
Rm so1 IT. h select e
that II Bishop 0Farrel! wishes to DO made
doss not asne The Dses Mgr MsibSn VT
made of Bfoofya Ms
MoDonne!l will doubtless become Bishop a
Almost all Of the Brooklyn prissts believe
though NJ public manifestation Of dissensioa
S een made de- fnoxe 10 ess6ols slteI:s
th ss Sy bs p1o thTs %Ss
year ago Hreof(yn was without & dioess.a
sG 81 nssss Tsss 2Soss
asdsl n she In snd
Anses 1' Niagara az and the r Re- AZ
fresnd ~n %hen Bshops oaehn vas alive
many OF the younger priests who were born
and educated In this country expressed them.
selves as not at all pleased over the fact thAt
| the Bishop gave some Of the best places IA the
| diocese to the Irish born clergymen. Tho
Sulpician and the Lazarist parties are In .
Archbishop corrlgan is we'll aware Of the
LouEhlins ,death. 1t has often been said thas
That the discussions among the priests Of the
| diocese will prevent any ono OF them from boz
ciergymen. fho well-known policy Of TIC
Roman authorities Is to unite factions whether
| In o diocese or a nation. It is admitted that IA
| the selection Of the new Bishop the Pope will
| be guided In great measure by the advice o.
| Archbishop Corrigan and the Bishops OF the
| New York province Every one Of the Bishops
Is in harmony with the Archbishop. and his
| wish and theirs. as far as the selection Of .
Bishop for Brooklyn Is considered. IL said to
| be Identical.
Archbishop Corrigan Vicar General, has been
| Rpoken OF as a successor Of Bishop Loughlin.
| II is now said that Archbishop Corrigan re-
| CARDS him q too Invaluable man to be let 90.
| As Vicar General he IL said to have more than
| satisfied the Archbishop. who believes he
| would find it difficult to I'LL his place should he
be made Bishop Of Brooklyn. SUN reporter
was told yesterday that Mgr. Farley had said
| to n friend that he felt sure his name was not
on tho list sent to Rome by the Bishops.
that there seems to DO little doubt that the
Bishop Of Brooklyn will not DO q Brookly2tte
and that he will BIO q man Of Archbishop Cor.
| ripan'S choosing.