St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1892-02-21
IN SPECIAL TERM.
Judges Put Out of the Way Many
Legal Questions.

ii y
Legal Questions.
The district court judges, sitting in
special term, disposed of matters as
follows yesterday:
BY Judge Kelly-Ansel W. Barker VS..
William Lettau ct al; motion for new
trial denied. Hemming & Melville VS..
William Lettau ct al; motion for new
trial denied. Fred w. Elder VS.. William
Lettau ct al; motion for new trial heard
and taken under advisement. George
MOeller VS.. Louise Broecker, and The
Germania Life Insurance Company
as garnishee; referred to w. ii.
YardleY to take disclosure. A. J.
Barrett ct al. VS.. Nicholas j.
Klein, and the Northwestern Fuel Com
pany as garnishee; Judgment against
the garnishee for amount disclosed. n.
5. Tracy VS.. Alex Donald ct al, and
Globe Corresponding Company as
garnishee; rererred to w. w. Dunn to
take disclosure. Blossom Bros. & Mer-
Fill VS.. Amelia Kingsley ct al; order
made confirming sheriff's report of sale.
In the matter of the assignment of E. j.
Mues: bids for real estate considered,
and matter adjourned until "Wednesday.
when it will be further considered in
chambers. In the matter of the assign
ment of George II. NuttiDg; submitted
on petition of assignee for leave to turn
over certain personal proper to claim
ants. w. s. Conrad VS.. J. E. Hopes ct
al, and The Germania Bank
lei Murphy to take disclosure,
M. ]. O'Connor VS.. Martin Delaney,
defendant granted permission to amend
his answer on payment of $40 costs.
In the matter of the assignment of j.
+. Bartholomew; submitted GU appII
cation to allow the final account of as
signee. Sophia A. Adler VS.. Flyton,
and Germania Insurance company as
garnish9e; referred to Daniel Murphy
to take disclosure. Julius Kessler VS..
j. E. Hopes Consolidated Hotter COM
pany, and the Germania bank as gar
nishee; referred to Daniel Murphy to
take disclosure. Annie Michel VS..
Christian Michel; order made fixing
time within which defendant may an
swer. j. E. Stryker VS.. Daniel j. Nc
Enry. and the Bank of Minnesota as
garnlshee; Judgment against the gar
Dishee for S4024, the amount disclosed
to be due. William c. P Miller vs..
KoSt d Cresy; submitted as demurrer
to part of the defendants answer.
By Judge kerr-George 0. Nettleton
VS.. The Ramsey County Land and Loan
Company: heard OH motion for new
trial. John Rogers & Bro. VS.. The Mer-
camille Insurance Company; submitted
on motion for new trial. Bohn Man
ufacturlng Company VS.. j. Henry
BroOme; submitted on motion for a
continuance. Earl Nelson ct al. VS.. c..
A. B. Weide; order to show cause why
the st. Paul Trust company should not
be made party defendant; dismissed.
BY Judge OtiS-J. F. Tostevin & Son
VS.. Esther Grisson ct al; heard in part
upon demurrer to amend complaint. and
case continued one week. Mary Nc
Dougall VS.. Frank Waters ct al: sher-
ifs report of sale confirmed. George
Meierhoffer q Bro. vs.. st. Joseph Fruit
and Produce Exchange; Judgment
against garnishee ordered. Bushnell d
Bushnell VS.. Matthew Y. Bridges; sub
mltted on motion to file supplemental
answer. In the matter of Michael J.
O'Brien, an insolvent. leave was given
to distribute proceeds without filing re-
leases.
By Junge Cornish-In the matter of
the insolvency of Petrus A. Bergsma;
receivers account allowed. Joseph
Stehr VS.. Emil Wishert; submitted on
demurrer to complaint. Lizzie Black
VS.. c. Williams; order to show cause
why execution should not be set aside
heard and dismissed. Martha A. Hitz
VS.. Otto j. HitZ; alimony granted pend
ing divorce proceedings. Conrad Fink
VS.. John Germansehitts; service of
complaint set aside. Susie A. Brown
VS.. John Z. Brown; submitted on an
application to require defendant to pay
500 attorneys fees in divorce case, as
ordered at former day of court.
BY Judge Egan-Fred l.. Rosemond
VS.. John Graham; heard OH motion for
new trial. Almeda Manning VS.. j. j.
Cullen; settled case signed. A. S. Pine
VS.. st. Paul City Railway Company;
heard on motion for new trial. Martin
Bruggeman VS.. Willrich & Lambert;
argument of main case concluded, and
submitted for decision on merits. In
the matter of the application to appoint
a receiver for the effects OF Ware S.
Rnircnl.. n,.d .a..dL liz. -.