Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1892-06-25
charge Of the pulpit. a. T.lom. and Ksn.ine-

charge or the puipfe ~ Iskoma ana kensfng-
ton
A discussion arose as to the nature 81 the
examination, and Mr. Douglass said he pro-
pos<d 10 show that there was Q conspiracy on
part Of the Emery family 70 precipitaie the
trouble
Defendant then said that on the day Of the
nrst AMIR he hsdth baby out for an airing. ana
when on Q street, in sight Of the Emery house,
ne saw Miss Emery. The Inter, he said,
croescd the street and made toward
the head Of the carriage. She kissed the child
before he could interfere and he raised his arm
70 Keep her away. Fred Emery came over and
a thief and threatened him in case
he lifted his finger toward his CEmery's, rsster.
Miss Emery, he said. remarked: "well, I kissed
the baby, anyway" and left Defend
government objected The court passed
upon the question and witness said he had re-
fused her access 20 the child more than
month before the affair. He then referred 10
the second affair. He said he went down
to kingman place this time, as he
first meeting. He. however, did meet her, and
she succeeded in kissing the child She said 70
him: This day will ruin YOU, and You Will hear
from me in a few days"
Defendant said he did not raise his hand 20
strike her and he was unconscious Of the fact
that he had come in contact with her. He had
told her abe could not see the child when she
vas At his house and repeated the statement to
her the next morning.
II told her." he said. shat she could not
have ANYTHING to do with the child Is long a.
abe conducted this campaign"
81 object" interrupted the district attorney
The objection WINS overruled.
He said that IN the presence Of himself and
his mother Miss Emery had said that she would
rather see the child dead than for il to be in
his mothers charge. At the time Of the
first occurrence Miss Emery came toward the
carriage with extended arms and he thought
che was going to take it. In such event he
knew there would have been a worse street
scene than there was.
On cross-examination witness denied that he
took hold Of Miss Emery, rs she described. He
was excited and he NAV possibly have pushed
her away. II he did so he did not remember
WITNESSES FOR THE Defense.
A little child, Genevieve Luchs, Of six and
one-half years Of age, was called to the stand
with her mother and the counsel remarked that
she and another child were important wit
nesses. An attempt was made TO get her 20
state the facts when she burst into tears.
Judge Miller directed her to be taken away.
remarking that such child should not be called.
Mrs. Carrie Darlington testified that on Sune
she heard the child cry and Fastening to the
front heard Miss Emery say: You'll paw for
this" Her son has told Miss Emery that until she
and the family stopped defaming him she could
not see the child.
On cross examination Mrs. Darlington enid
when she reached the front Miss Emery was
outside Of the gate and her son inside. MISS
Emery had pushed her way into her house some
weeks since when they told her that she
could not come in.
She had called her son. the defendant. a
murderer, perjurer, &c, and she aided her son
in denying her admittance to the house until