The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1892-04-03

eyes some has been found there in three
cuts, near the Keith tunnel"
What was that tunnel run for?n
ITO determine whether the porphyry
was local run TO the deep"
"How far has the tunnel been run in?'
"a bout seventy feet"
Still working on it?'
mo, sir.n
"Why not2"
THE PLAINTIFFS STOPPED IT.
Because the parties claiming the ground
put up a notice, warning US to cease work
Frank White, one OF the plaintiffs, told me
that he had it put up''
"What was found in cut Dln
"Quite bunch of porphyry was found
there"
"What in cut No. ], run by the plain
tiffs?n
Nothing; no porphyry; no signs of it."
Now, is porphyry disclosed in any of
this big circle OF cutss"
mo, sir''
''How is it to the east of that?'
'Never have seen any porphyry there"
''What would be its effect if there is
dyke of porphyry there's"
1T WOULD NOT AFFECT THE VEIN.
sit has not been affected at all, for the
vein is found on both sides, without dis
placement"
''Now, as to those rolls in the quartzite?"
"Well, the best Illustration is to compare
it to the waves of the sea when the wind is
blowing
Have those rolls actually developed in
the work9"
"Yes. sir.n
MIR. Wlliams-Do you think there is a
probability OF ore being found on beyond
the Court upraise and towards the Fair
view!
81 certainly do. There has been ore
taken out at the contact
us there porphyry dyke at the Jennie
Lind!"
MYSTERY.
"Well. that's o kind of mystery to me-
L wanted to find out, and tried to get per-
mission frem Stuart Stephenson to allow
me run a tunnel for that purpose, but he
wouldn't allow NE TO do sou
us ii & dyke2"
THAT is hard to say. 1 wanted very
much to determine it, but was not allowed
TO do so by MIR. Stephenson, one of the
plaintiffs"
Judge Marshall-When did the defend
ants first break in the triabgle!"
I'm January, 1890"
Were you taking ore from any other
part Of the nine?n
THE TRIANGLE.
'Nes, in a stope above the Northland
We had about one-fourth of our force in
the triangle between december 81, 1889,
and January IL, 1880, and the ore taken by
Us from the triangle would amount to
about one-fourth of the amount shipped By
us during those dates"
Have you made an estimate of the
amount of GRE taken by tie defendants
from the triangle?n
Eyes, we took out about one hundred and
fifty tons OF first class ore and 800 tons of
second class"
"HoW CO you arrive at thatY'
"By the total amount shipped ard the
proportion of our force in the triangle"
Mr.. Williams-How DO you fix the date
when you encountered ore?
The Witness-Because | was here on
that Perego case, and returned on Deem
Der 81, 1887.
The Perego suit was an action against
you, wasn't it.'
PEEEGo WANTED IT TOO.
Yes, he wanted it, then. Laugh teri.
DAVID KEITH
testified: [ have beeu miner ever since |
was fourteen years old, and have worked
al various places, among them the Com
stock. l went to Park City nine or Ten
years ago, and for eight years had cha. sc
of the Anchor. l was down the Mayfiower
shaft once or twice week while il was
being sunk 1t was driven through Iilne
from top TO bottom. The vein disclosed in
the WORKINGS shown on the maps is C con
tact vein between quartZite and lime. The
Woodside tutael is driven n contact aud in
several places shows quartzite. The Wood
side shaft isIn quarlzlJe.
THROUGH THE UNDERGROUND WORKINGS.
MIR. Keith here made a trip through the
underground workings, from Wilman's
discovery on through all the shafts, incines,
tunnels, Slopes and Levels, and at various
points along the route pointed our
where the quartzite was eDcount-
cred. Gong then into the Silver
King, not shown in the map, Mr..
Keith said that qUarIzite was found
in the Silver King shaft and they sank
the May on their knowledge of the
Silver King. The two sns1ts were now
within one hundred feet OF each other, and
could hear each other working. Coming
then to the court raise, Mr. Keith said
that it was in the VEN all the wGy. On
the last trial, the plaintiffs claimed that the
vein went out through the roof. Since
then the vein had been
STRIPPED FOR SEVENTY FIVE FEET
further. No bed of lime had been dropped
w lnZeS uau DS6n SUNK at DOLl enQS or this
raise, and i'll both the quartzite was en-
countered. What the plaintiffs claimed
was fault in the Northland raise seemed
TO him to be but roll in the formation, and
it was his opinion that the vein continued
on. The vein in the mine was in one place
about sixty feet thick.
Mr.. Dickson Which was the more favor
able indications as to vein matter, the
Court upraise or the Big incline:
MORE NATURALIZATION IN THE UPRAIsE
''The Court incline there is more min
eralzation there and the vein is softer"
"Where do you find the vein cropping on
the surface?'
I'm the Woodside and in the Wilman dis
covery in the Tenderfoot lode"
Where have you traced the line of con-
tact?"
around the hill from cuts l to II"
"Where, then, is the apex?n
sin this line of cuts"
SIS there naturalization there?n
AT THE FAIRvIEw.
Eyes; there is good vein matter in all of
cuts, the best showing being at the Fair
view discovery and at cuts and g. In cut
Z the vein matter is three feet wide and
lies on the quartziten
''Now, along the Big incline, before you