The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1892-11-07
sSIvELY DopGEs THE TRUTH.

sxArTL9, Nov. s tsa2
To TIRE FpFros: IN sas 81 soral whiea tas
TssegrsaA Yesterday asvoses 70 ytnaicsts snively.
the ioilewing passage oecersi
As to the sui. The assasstt Of M John T.
aeSrsw explains tsis fully. and We simply re-
Ter 70 II Mr.. Brown was Fhs Darts st 81 om TIE
lsSsl Proceedings we're aimed, says the attorney
Tor LAs neiFs VINO bFoagas the seton.
TIE sesaavit 70 which the Tsiee-apA refers vas
pEiatsa twice IA tae same nuIn ger, and il reads
entiselv fEersnt from the above cltatias. the
following verbatim eStrast frera tie an iastt oi
attorney Joan T Acarau vii sho~. hs says;
These claims against Mr.. salvsiy. guardian
Tor IRE FA8eD heirs, were prosecuted 10 l0dE-
meat ~ Judge NJ Ill nsnt vita ytsw at the
bus, a. ! understand It "a enforce payment
against M. George W. bfown. who was one 81
the sareEtes ~ Mr.. SnivsIy. aad N Whose hands
Is was sUpsosed part OF those fRads hsd been
placed IA The shsps Of = lesa by the guardian
There is big difference between this state
msui Ct Lawyer hctsTaw. of West Virginia. ard
he Fs!sSraPAs extract ef bis statement The
Telegraph says that ]. 7. McGFsw susd for the
uo0sy be ougtng 20 the Fsslon hesrs. Lawyer
Mc0raw says hs had nothing ~ do with IL. bat
that Judge \. II. Dent broagat TIE suit and oo-
tanned Judgment The Telegraph says that se-
eording 70 tho statement ol Lxwycr Ac9raw
tac latter brought sal; on!y against Brown per-
sena4sy. while Actsrsw says 'ss | understand
IL the saii VAS brought against Brown - one
OF sniyely's securities.
But the whole truth 10 that the suit
brought against Snlvsly and his snre.lss, rs tho
copy Of The Judgment OF the court PLAINLY states,
the correctness OF which ia net dsaisd by
snively himself
What can be tia purpose of the Telegraph in
THUS lying right Ia the lace of the aThdsgits
which IL publishes 40 PROMINENTLY There Is
Only one explanation. knowing that the AZ
adayits brought forward by Snisely only con-
firm the original story OF his misdoings in thu
Fsilon case, as published in the Poer-IsrELLf-
eEscKR, the TsieQrapA wants TO muddls the
matter in order to prevent iis readers getting at
the truth.
Alter sii 5nivsly's statements and the sfids-
vita OF his friends and fellow Democrats, these
facts stiiI remain; That in spite OF the verdict
OF the court OF the Third judicial circuit of
West Virginia, which ordered snsvsiy in 1855 10
ray iato said court the money due the four Fall
Ion heirs, together with Interest and costs OF
court. snisely has not done up 70 date
The fa!lon heirs, after waiting four years In
vain for some money from suively, turned this
Judgment ss bad debt over TO Dun & Co., the
well-knovn mercantile sgeacy, for collection;
aud the latter In 1890 offered to make q compro-
mise. that Is. In other words, 10 take so many
cents on the dollar. But Mr.. snively refused to do
that either. He would pay nothing except when
the children would become of age. And when,
after another year had expired. In December.
1891. one Of these orphans did become Of ago.
snivsiy did not pay anything. because, frat, he
had forgotten all about IL; and. next, he had
beea sick and had no money TO spare And
when another year later. In November. 1881, he
10 reminded of this Judgment again and of his
promise 70 Dun q Co. In 1890 and of his failure
to psy in 1881, he needs all his cash money for
election expenses. and does not pay a solitary
cent yet
And when In the faro OF all those facts. which
snively himself admits aud states. the Telegraph
says, and he himself says. he IL an honest man,
then they either think that the pu hlio OF Seattle
isa lot of idiots, or they. the Telegraph and
snlyely, are the two checklist liars tevsn thu
champion Rochester campaign liar not ex.
eeptedl that ever appeared In this city, county
and state. No sNivKIY poa NE