Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1892-10-05

Hon Il. b. Hubbard in an interview
written for the Dallas News finally dis
poses Of the Republican endorsement
Of Geo. Clark in the following convinc.
ing language;
"As neither GIogg nor Clark will ropulso
ur iuSult any honest Republican, Populist
Or PruhlbluOulst whoa state issues wants
TO vote for one or the other land thousands
VIII vote for both Of thom) so neither will
MIR. Cleveland nor his advisors be guilty OF
the suicidal act OF repulsing by word or
deed from the polls the thousands of loyal
Texas Democrats who are going 10 vote Tor
him because they honestly dinor and divide
on local state issues. While II ia case of
deepest regret that this division q will not
"a it diAinteEration) took place ut Hnus.
Ton, all far minded men not blinded BY
nero partisan zeal and who do not worship
40 the shrine OF men rather than OF
measures, must admit that the said division
took place impOlled by no sudden burst OF
passion, but that both sides did what they
did aud declared us they did under well
muturod and conscientious convictions OF
thoir respective duty to tho state II was
o division on a higher plane than purla.
mentnry tactics or thu machinery OF the
convention system which trough the zen.
eral mode Ia recent years TO settle party
disputes nevertheless involves no prluGl.
pes por Sc, Their object Il TO get Combi-
nations OF men 10 advance great measures
II was, as already indicated, brought Nhn Ut
BY radical and hreconchable diNereuc es of
henei On cardinal creeds OF political taith,
state and national.
''lhe difference between formal in.
dorsomont OF candidates for statA officers
whore national issues are not Involved mo-
ccssuri'y and the voting for said In large or
small bodtos OF an opposing party "a TIVE
tledum aud twodlo Ice "A distinction with.
out difference, Hogs Clark ANA Nurent.
every one OF them are seeking Republican
votes and will be- glad To get them Every
state Ia The Union have totally distinct Ia
sues, while on national issues each party
nave issues common 10 zach organization
For instance both tho lioEg aud Clark di,i-
sions unite ON the Same electoral tIrsot
Win about uu equal number on said ticket
OF Hpgg aud ClasN electoral
"GuN. PattisOn. Democrat Of ponnsyl.
Nania, received o 0uO Republican votes and
was elected and the same G0,OOl Kepuhu.
caus gave 600 majority to Harrison in
ISIS Pattlson is still Democrat ana M
t0OOl Republicans arc are SIN RenubiL
cans lhia WAS state contest on state
issues. So u was with Gov. Ross aud So
IeNas Republicans in 1890 voted for me
then Acknowledgement, Mr.. Hogg Tho
point l respectfully make " that acting
together under the l.Hmpasas Q ,nvention
and voting In mass Tor Cleveland they will
Ia November, the IIogg and Clark din. IONS
1ro state Democrats as much as was and Is
Gov pattison OF PeRnsylyunia or GOV
Ross OF Texas. wv
After recounting tho names OF illus
irions Democrats in the state who viii |
vote for Clark, he concludes
III ilorc because / beileve In lpa,.,
Clark political views aud platform ana /
because rcgaM the division Al Hopsfor ~
the nau liable result Of lrroconciiabie
opinions, aud because OF tho new niatlstef
the ms convention favurinr state han ~
Issue Issue ,opposea ey To&as siuca inc cor III.
i,.l OF ls3,el and faroriug an income lax
law ior Federal purposes. npposed bv ia
S si, southern and Northern Democracy
49, t,,, seeghsl ruetlon, ami while admitting
taat the urst convention had a majority ~
wv NV eele29,is tot because OF their RAT.
leyals Is aoova think i becomes a Demo.
crate 'ffoe light TO finish in Noyember
F., shal4 Tor these reasons vote for Jsdge
george Clark for Rovcaor .
;, Y y now Ia order Tor the Hogg he-
'ioh 20 proceed TO read Gov. Hubbard
Out Of the Democratic party.