The Democratic advocate. [volume] (Westminster, Md.) 1865-1972, 1892-06-04
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.
NO. 1927 EQUITY.
In the Circuit Court for Carroll County.
.Jobn n Raitt vs.. C. Hanson Raitt ct al.

In the Circuit Court for Carroll County.
John 4. Raitt vs. C. Hanson Ratt ct al.
The object Of the Petition of Mary Jane
Raitt, Executrix of C. Hanson Raitt, late of
Carroll county, Maryland, deceased, fled in
this cause, is to obtain an order Of Court
subrogating the petitioner, as the legal rep
resentative Of said G.. Hanson Raitt to the
creditors of Nathan Raitt, late of Carroll
county, deceased, and requiring the trustees
in the above cause to pay over to her, after
dedueiing expenses and proper commissions,
the balance of the undisiribnted proceeds of
sale from the real estate.
The Petition states that on the Both day of
April, 1885, a certain Nathan Raitt, died in
Carroll county, Maryland, interstate and un-
married, seized of certain real estate in said
county; that said real estate was. sold by
c. Hanson Raitt and G.. W. Crapster, trus.
tees, appointed by decree of the court, for
Sc, 1877 so, and that the sum Of So, l67. SO OF
said sales were distributed among the heirs
at law of said Nathan, leaving the undistribu
ted sum of 81 $4,000, in the hands of the
trustee in the cause; that letters OF admin
istration were granted to the said G. Hanson
Raitt by the Orphans Court of Carroll
county, on the personal estate Of said
Nathan, who qualified, and entered upon the
duties of administration thereof; that in
the month of March, 1892, said G.. Hanson
Raitt, died in Carroll county, leaving will,
by which he devised and bequeathed all his
property to his wife, the petitioner, and APP
pointed her executriX of said will; that she
applied for and obtained from the Orphans
Court Of Carroll county, letters testamentary
on said will, and as such exeeutrix settled on
the 25th day of April, 1892, the first and final
account of her husband, as administrator Of
said Nathan Raitt, from the books and papers
left by said deceased; that said settlement
shows a balance due her husbands estate of
SI,II4.S after accounting and charging him
with the entire assets and personal estate OF
his decedent; the petition prays that the
said uudstributed proceeds Of said real estate
now in the hands of the trustees in the cause,
to-wit: 100000, may be paid over to the
petitioner to make good in part, the balance
due the estate of her testator, from the estate
of said Nathan; that the heirs at law OF
said Nathan, at the time Of the filing or
the Bill, were said C. Hanson Raitt, a
brother; John T. Raitt, nephew; Henry
C. Raitt, a nephew; Charles H. Raitt,
nephew; Laura c. Raitt, a neice; Elizabeth
+. Eye, neice; Richard W. Simpson, a
nephew; Thomas W. Simpson, nephew;
Edward b. Simpson, nephew; George K.
Simpson, nephew; Sophia S. Crapster,
wife of said G.. W. Crapster, and Lurenno A.
Aiken, neice; hat since said bill was
! filed said T.. Hanson kaitt has died as afore-
said, also said John T. Raitt and Sophia S.
Crapster; that said John T. left an adult
daughter, Ella, married to Rev. -
Sherwood; that said Charles II. Raitt
Laura c. Raitt, Elizabeth E. Eye, George r.
Simpson, Lurenno A. Aiken and Ella Sher
wood are non residents, living beyond the
State of Maryland. That Henry c. Raitt is
| living in Baltimore City; Richard W. Simp-
| son and Thomas W. Simpson, in Frederick
county, and Edward B. Simpson and Gusta-
vus W. Crapster are living in Carroll county,
/ Maryland.
| 1t is thereupon adiudged and ordered by
the Circuit Court of Carroll county, in Equity,
this 10th day of May, in the year eighteen
hundred and ninety-two, that the petitioner,
by causing copy of this order to be inserted
in some newspaper published in Carroll
county, Maryland, once in each of four sue
cessive weeks before the Goth day OF June,
next, give notice to the said Charles Il.
Raitt, Laura c. Raitt, Elizabeth E. Eye,
George R. Simpson, Lurenno A. Aiken and
Ella Sherwood who are non-residents of the
State of Maryland, absent defendants, of the
object and substance of said petition, and
warn them to appear in this Court in person,
or by Solicitor, on or before the 9th day OF
July, 1892, to answer said petition and show
cause, if any they have, why decree ought
not to pass prayed.
CHARLES b. ROBERTS,
True Copy,-Test
my2I st BENZ. F. GROUSE, Clerk.