Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1892-12-07
THIRD DISTRICT COURT.
Short VARIED Lilo, and no! Alto.
gsthef a Merry One
That pMLY STUMBLING BLOCK
training order 10 Divorce Case
Miscellaneous Matters before Judge
zane.-llcsring Before d Referee.

v.es,lancous Matters before Judge
zsse-llcaring Before Referee.
rolIowlug In the wake Of yesterday,
rh,sf Justice Zane began his morn
AS. work To-Day with the hesrSps OF a
a,,,,ce suit. The parties were Ellie
At shc,tle In woli.dressei. attractive
conan, about 81 years OF age) vs.Chas.
4. shottle.
The plaintiff was represented by
colonel NJ. NJ. Kaighn.
plaintiff and defendant were
u,rrled Ut American Fork as recently
/. April 10Th In the present year,
ina hitter having be0n employed
!. the superintendent Of a mine at
Tiotlc. HIS s,lary wsseaii to average
,lso Der month, but plaintiil informed
N. Ceurt that he had not contributed
ANYTHING whatever towards her sup
port from the day Of their marriage.
ahe had some money OF her own when
,he married the defendant, but he
alofroypdD IL all from her aud she had
not .eon single dollar Of 1t since.
Colonel KaIghn asked Mrs. Shettle II
aha knew the Defendants reason for
refusing 20 provide for hor.
Plalntifl--I suppose Il Il his DISPOSE
zion; hs cannot help himself, and She
saws ho will not provide for me for the
future.
II ,rnnspitci that Mira. Bhe,tle, who IL
A well eiuchtod woman, was prior TO
her marriage assistant boOkkeeper at
one OF the mines In Tintic.
Cofroboratlye evidence ~ to tbs do.
fendanps neglect OF his vile having
been Rdiucod, the court granted the
decree rs prayed.
A RESTRAINING ORDsE.
In the pending divorce suit Of Eliza
!. smith W. Samuel Is. Smith, Attor.
ney Il. T.. Barker applied 10 the court
for an order to restrain the deiontant
from dlsposlng Of his property pcHdcnte
Me. nnd the application was granted.
This plaintiffs compliant Il based on
the grounds OF cruelty and habituai
drunkehncss.
Is A DILEMMA.
Once more the case Of the American
Publishing company vs. the Fisher
Brewing company was called up In
vain. Ii was reported that the sick
jurymau tMr. Hininsnl was today
confined TO his bed, and that the
chances we're he would not DO able TO
attend court for week or more.
faVa 40
perhaps 1t would bs well, II counsel
would agree 10 It, to refer the case 10
some competent lawyer to try.
Attorney Dey lOf plain,iil's counael)
said they we're willing either that the
trial should proceed with tho eleven
remaining Jurors, be tried by the court,
OF REFERRED AZ suggested by his honor.
But Attorney J. L.. Rawlins, on the
part OF tho defendants, was not now
prepared 10 assent " either Of these
propositions. He preferred, hc sai1,to
nave trial Of the ease before "a full
Jury.
The Judge-You are not willing 10
refer II In any way2
Mr.. Rswiins answered In the mega
tiv.
Eventually Judge Zane aii he
would postpone the matter until 10.
morrow morning. and n II was then
found that there was no possibility of
the parties coming to some sort OF an
arrangement, tho care had better 60
over ior the term.
GENERAL.
In the case OF George J. Brennan,
charged with perjury, the motion TO
quash Indictment submitted yesterday
by Attorney Reilly, was ovorru!ed.
The case OF John Anderson OF nj, vs..
Chas. klambeck o. al. was continued
by consent
Charles L.. Hoffman W. Edwin
Douet ct A.. Motion 10 relax costs
Of defendant as to attorneys Tee Of SO
was agreed aud submitted.
In the matter Of Il. NJ. Wilson vs..
A. l.. Williams O. al, the defendant
Withdrew his answer except on ths
oonIes. as 10 attorneys lees 10 he nj.
lowed.
Geo. T.. Bltz W. Emma Whiting.
by consent Ju igment was entered for
The plaintiff, as prayed, SIS attorney'a
fee being aliowei.
OVER PRo,ussoRY NOTES.
Judge Anderson, M referee, this |
morning "a. IN the Supieme Court
room and commenced b. hear the ties.
umvny In n case Ia which Louis |
Hyams anu Johu A. Erwin are the |
plaintiffs and Simon Bsmbofgsr and |
w. j. Salisbury are dele ndanls.
Plalntihs aliege that on NUvemb Dor |
18th, 1901, they were the owners OF |
Three promlsBOry notes signed by John |
Beok-iwo lof $1,000 each and the other |
iof siIlS..O, secured ~ 1000 shares OF |
stock In tho Bullioh. Beck ~ Cham io n |
aiming company. On the date men.
h0ned, they say, the defendants had |
possession OF the noies anu unlawnily |
converted the same to their own use.
The defendants deny oil the material
allegations In the complaint AMI aver
That the three notes which they had |
debt.
Jones and Schroeder are attorneys
Tor the plaintiffs; RawIins and Critch.
low represent the Defendants.