New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1892-11-20
THE CATHOLIC UNIFERSiIfS 1fFd'"''
Az ALLEGED CRITICISM AT TIE ARC h'lS"'rV
MEETING ANswERED by BISHOP KFANh.

Az ALLEGED CRITICISM AT THE ARCii8lSlO'S
NETTING AyswERED by BISHOP KFANE.
WASHINGTON. Nov. io-The attention OF The Rlgh'
po rohn ! Eca.e rector Of tho Catholic Inivc SHY
~ america wa 10 day called 10 the statement sen.
ont fr,rn Ncy.-Yorh last night concerning on a'or'
Discussion by the conference OF Catnc archU',p' III
New.York Yesterday Of Tie condition OF the 'aV"oh,
University In this city. In this statement II VIC 'aN
that The university is not IN state Wholly ''N
factory 10 the Church anhor.tcS, sld tAat IL Is W
ro means tho success, II Promised TO be wien II was
established Two ycers ago. The s'atchcno Iu'"'''
SAYS ,ha; the number Il students on the UNIVERSITY
r,u f., scarcely moro than the membership Oh INC
faculty ThI, unfortunate condition Of dlSuua' -
nlc-ri e. De- due IN a mca."rc = nc maalrH' Puui'
ct,i.n ~ q pamphlet on the subject oi edu'" "
Dr. Bouqgill)n. General exceptions were 'a"o" ~
the tenor OF this pamphlet which Wa pronounced III
#. argument In favor Of state supervision over par
och.al schools 49,
bishop Kcinc made 10 a representative OF '"'
Associated Pres, the following statement:
have n, r,-on [, believe TINT tho university has
hon In any way discussed AZ the meeting OF me
archb,LJps IN NcvYoIN. consider IL very u iac'> \;
-,nce tie affie. - tie university Nc III t'e nHN u
a board Il directors, FIVE OF WI ON are archDlsunp'
mud wig hold meetngs a,ay; rh s,e assertion. ser thai
Tho affair, OF the university are In an unsuuSlatD.J
condition seems the face Of II sratultons 10 say o.
least SO SUCH conclusion Wa, reached by ths goaiu
~ direct ,rs WHO carefully looked into the affairs OF
The university Last May. The statements III resaIl
- The feNuc,s % ihr students 90 lue "n.N'l,f I'D"
rvc rrnwi,lcc ~ thc nature OF the institution. ana
WHO I, willing - 90 4 Justice. IN ne iiTst p'ac' ~
Is a Dos, er.duatr Institution cXciuNvey, ana any
one ncluanLA ytth tn u'Vc-l'i N''h a. hnuMN '..'
fho can, many professors and few students ANY on
NAV ascertain thi, by referring IL other p'stga1ua :
.iritl,uS Of O." cJ.ntry. II never Wa cAP,''oH
iha aesa', would ,' ,-o 9 iS ra.on " ,t eiyrn.
tnt Ala from Inc plain fact tlh IN" students beng
thus far on'y ecclesiastical students. hay" 20 po~":
81. IA. eif a
~ ihe country haze aeain and arnln declared iha'
th.y would c'ndly send more stndrns, Out t'hi We
dnculv ~ SUPPLYING the needs II IN rn'.S rs reni r
Il impossible, fcr thom T. s"nd - many a they Wo""'
m. ALLEGATION that fhe fewrcss 81 tic h,ricn
1, caused hy % sDit Ot csrra'. 1nd thai ms Is III
@on,r degree owing 70 Dr.. Bouquion's pamphlet on
tn. school question. has n' foundation IN ttr';
fore Or BGiuuilloa's pamphlet appeared The list of
student. had been completed, not only for thr years
i--Q and i-0O. but ais, for the wear 1871. lho
harin- upnn the number ~ students during the last
three wears, That Il has had no such eject THIS wear
/, manifest from the mci that scv' raj t~hop' VINO
fund f. lup,Hrilclle 10 send students before nave
ti. var managed do 50. and that not one OF the
former patrons II Tie university his IN any way
shown ds>rtst unwillnslcS' 20 send SUDDEN ;
was found faull With in Rome but emily by tho"
who wer" then finding faul, with Archbishop Ireland,
nay. who wcr" as'aillnS him With such nnsreniy
Violence that the Pope himself rad 10 pat stop to H.
The fnal decision Of the Holy soc has been vn1l-
cation both OF Archbishop ireland and DR.. Eouqull'
Ion.
I'm that controversy should show their feelings hy
such I'm mutations Us those which have repeatedly NJ
late ben lali before the public. Thank God. The
nnairs " the university are In splendid eHape. The
courses of phli0-ophy. letter and sciences VIII be
opened the aity OF the country IN 1894.