Los Angeles herald., 1892-03-07
SUPREME COURT.

Supreme Court. Los Angeles District.
MONDAY, APRIL AIN BANK.
Court meets at % a. m. Motions and exam
Ination of class of applicants for admission to
practice.
TUESDAY, SIN BANK.
People VS. All Lee Doom.
Chadbourne VS. Bates.
S p Co VS. Valla, etc, etal.
Wheeler VS. Tweed.
Irobridge VS. Burgess.
Comber Land Co VS. Morgan.
WEDNESDAY, GIN BANK.
Rose VS. Foord.
Baines VS. Story ct al.
Baines VS. BabcOck ct al.
Potter VS. Desn.
Myers VS. Truiillo.
De Pena VS. Trujillo.
THURSDAY, Tin BANK.
Marble Lime co VS. Boggs, etc, and the Lords
burg Hotel Co etc.
FRIDAY, S-DRPARTMENT ONE.
People VS. All Sing.
People VS. tellon.
Peoyle VS. Charley Lee Kong.
People VS. Faulke.
People VS. An Sing.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
Estate of Backus (deceased).
Cresswell ct al VS. Welchman.
Barrows VS. Fox ct al
Crane VS. Forth ct al.
Hill VS. Bd Supervisors Ventura Co.
Moore, Adm, VS. Calkins.
MoNDAY,s11- 11-DEPARTMENT ONE.
Philbrick VS. Schultz ct al.
Smith VS. City of San Louis Obispo.
Brown VS. O'Neal
Shaw VS. Mayer.
Dorm VS. Baker. a..
Haskin VS. James.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
People VS. Dolan.
People VS. Lane.
People VS. Manning.
People VS. Beckwith.
People VS. Devine.
People vs. UrquidaS.
TUESDAY, 12-DEPARTMENT ONE.
Doty vs. ONeil
Harris VS. Wickenden.
Also Water Co vs Baker.
City of Santa Barbara vs. Eldred.
City OF Santa Barbara VS. Eldred.
O'Shea VS. Wilkinson, etc.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
Morgan VS. Co.
Morgan VS. S p co.
Blanc VS. Paymaster Mining Co,
Norton VS. A It & F r Co.
DeCoursey VS. Cox.
WEDNESDAY, 13.-DEPARTMENT ONE.
Garnsey ct al VS. Ferguson ct al
County of Orange VS. Harris.
Jefferson et al VS. Hewitt ct al.
James VS. Gomber.
Minter exr etc VS. City of Santa Ana.
DEPARTMENT TWO,
Brownlee VS. Riffenburg ct al.
High VS. The Bank of Commerce.
Con NATL Bank VS. PC S s Co.
Klauber ct al VS. San Diego st Car Co.
Blonoeau vs. Snyder ct al
Wall va Heald.
THURSDAY, 8-DEPARTMENT ONE.
Pool VS. Wilbur ct al.
McCord VS. Cal Natl Bank of San Diego.
Cuyamaca Granite Co VS. Pac Paving Co.'S
Ex-Mission Land & Water Co VS. Flash ct oil.
Long VS. Coronado R r Co.
Mason VS. Superior Court San Diego.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
De Pedrorena VS. Hotchkiss ct al.
Estate of Lamb.
Mclean VS. Martin.
Mclean VS. Redick.
Mclean VS. City of San Barnardino.
Ball. adm. VS. Kehl.
FRIDAY. S-DEPARTMENT ONE.
Naftzgar VS. Montague ct al.
NaftZger VS. Gregg ct al
Reed VS. Lyon ct al. p
Cbilds etc VS. Kincaid.
Crossman VS. Lesher.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
Waddingham VS. Tubbs.
Crossman VS. Remission.
Flagg VS. st Elmo Investment Co.
Stephens VS. ST Elmo Investment CO.
l. County VS. San Jose Land and w Co.
Weidwald VS. Dodson Ell al.
Carter VS. Baldwin.
MONDAY, 15-DEPARTMENT ONE.
Latin VS. Gillett ct al.
Dutton VS. Niles.
Townsend VS. Tufts ct al.
Dimmick, adm, VS. D1mmick.
Dimmick adm, vs. Dimmick.
Fleming VS. Fleming.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
Davis VS. s P Co.
Joyce VS. White.
Marshall VS. Taylor,
Redondo Beach Co VS. Miller.
Same VS. Turlutter.
Bean VS. Travellers Ins Co.
TUESDAY, 19-DEPARTMENT ONE.
COrker VS. Corker.
Amestoy VS. Electric Rapid Trans Co.
Delano VS. Jacoby.
Dehail VS. Morford.
Alexander VS. Chick.
Alhambra Addition w Co VS. Richardson.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
Rebman VS. San Gabriel Land & Water Co.
Cemetery Assn VS. City of L A.
Childs VS. Lanterman ct al.
Rising VS. Gibbs.
Weeks VS. Brockamp.
Miller VS. Richards.
WEDNESDAY, 2O-DEPARTMENT ONE.
Spence VS. Scott ct al, KOwalsky app.
Newman VS. Maldonado.
Schallert G i Co VS. Neal ct al.
Merrill VS. Merrill.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
Crane Co VS. Childress.
Fox VS. Co.
Siegel VS. His Creditors.
Strong witnesses.
Among the thousands OF testim Onials of cures