The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1892-10-21
GEO 7. MAYNADIER, Solicitor.
ORDER PUBLICATION.


Emma J. Ruth In the Circuit Court
Joh rsn 4. Ruth d @ and Others A In Equity
THE OBJECT of this bill is to obtain de-
Il cree for sale of certain real estate, situated
i'll Hartford County, and described therein and
distribution of the proceeds among the parties
beth Ruth's Last viii and Testament, after
payment of mortgage debt now held by Mrs.
Lucy F. Moo:e. The bill alleges that Mrs. Eliza
beth Ruth. late of Hartford county, died in the
month OF is sed OF 5Sh p aeTe
road leading from Churchville to Darlington,
adjoining the lands of James Lee, George
called "Ont Quarter" and Good Neighbore
hood, and leaving Il last will and testament
whereby she devised said real estate to her
three daughters, Emma J. Ruth, Martha Ann
Ruth and Sarah ROsena Ruth, that said Sarah
Rosena died sometime in December 1888, prior
to the death of her mother, unmarried and in
testate, leaving as her only heirs at law her
sisters and brothers, viz: Emma j. Ruth, Mar
thu Ann Ruth, WIN. E. Ruth and Charles w.
John A. Ruth, of the State of Dakota, and
Jalues Henry kuth, of the State of California,
both of last named being non-residents of the
State of Maryland. That the said above named
parties are each entitled to and seized of an un-
divided interest or share in said real estate as
follows: Emma ]. Ruth to seven eighteenths,
of and John A. Ruth, VIM. Z. Ruth Charles
W, Ruth and james Henry Ruth are each en-
titled to one undivided eighteenth part or
share thereof, That said real estate is not sus-
eeptibe of partition among those entitled to
same without great loss and injury. and that
they are unable to agree either upon parti
ton thereof or a sale for division of the pro-
ceeds Also that there is upon the land records
unreleased q mortgage upon said land with
other land of Sl,7OO executed by said Eliz;i-
beth Ruth and her husband, and Vim. L. Ruth
TO 4. Preston Gilbert, and by him assigned to
Mary L. Pannell, but it is charged that same is
paid. By subsequent petition it is shown that
said Mary l.. Paunell is now deceased and that
said mortgage is now owned by certain Mrs
Lucy +. Moore, of Baltimore city, who by
order of Court is made party defendant to
this bill. The bill then prayes that decree
may be passed for sale for partition of the
said above described lands and premises of
G5I acres more or less, and for subpOenas
against the above named resident defendants
and for order OF publication against the
said John A. Ruth and james Henry Ruth,
who are non-resdents of thes tate of Maryland,
warning tn en- to appear and answer the allie
cations of this bill of complaint, &c
WhereupOn it is this 9th day of October, 1892
ordered, that the complainant by causing
copy of this order to be inserted in some news
paper published in + afford county, once in
each of four successive weeks, before the eth
said nonresident defendants, John A. Ruth
and James Henry Ruth. of the object and SUBJ
stance of this bill, warning them to appear in
this Court in person or by solicitor on or be-
fore the twenty-third day of November next,
to show cause, il any they have, why a decree
ought not be passed as prayed.
WIN. s. FORWOOD, JR., Clerk
7oct WIN. s. FoRwooD, JR., Clerk.