San Antonio daily light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1886-1907, 1892-10-04
DISTRICT COURT PRooEEDrNGs

has been transacted in the Forty-fifth
district court:
In the case OF Thomas III. Abbo tt, VS..
\ the International Building and Loan as
ISOLATION, Judgment rendered in the sum
of 81, 900. Notice OF appeal was given by
plaintiff.
Carrie Birdsong against the Interna-
| tiolal & Great Northern railroad, dam
| ages; plaintiff was given leave TO file
| amended petition.
d. Sullivan & Co. against j. E. Adams
| and J. A. Frawley, on promissory note;
dismissed at defendants cost.
Thomas j. U. Williams against Alice
Williams, for divorce; f. G. Berry was
appointed to represent defendant.
Thornton, Wright & Co., against +. U.
Skidmore, on prOmiSsory note, jury was
called for by defendant and leave was
given to file first amended original an
swer.
Stapp & Co. against Gus Jennings on
attach nent: leave was granted to tle
first amended original petition.
City of San Antonio against John X.
Taylor, to recover taxes; death OF defend
ant was suggested and the case was con-
tinued to make parties.
Thornton Wright & Co. were granted
leave to file an intervention in the San
Antonio & Arkansas Pass receivership
case.
Thomson Houston Electric company
against the West End Street car COM
pany. on promissory note: transferred to
the Thirty seventh district court by
agreement.
The following cases were disposed of in
Judge Noonan's court:
Ylario Arabelle against the San Anto-
MO and Arkansas Pass Rwy, damages, dls-
missed at defendants cost.
ID. M. Poor ct al. against Z. H.. Wurz-
bach ct al, debt; leave was given defend
ants TO file first amended original answer:
The same action was taken in the cases OF
Nathan Mitchell against c. l.. Wurzbach
for debt: Francisco Rubiola ct al. to try
title and for damages; Emma L. Eplate-
nier against Julia II. Further and l.. j.
Further, to try title and for damages.
George Z. Dashiell against Theodore
Hermann, punishment; dismissed at
plaintiffs cost.
Helen McLeary against Frank Fl. Koe-
mig. to try title and for damages. leave
given plaintiff to file first amended petit
ton.
M. Landa & Bros. against II. Ally
McGhee. certiQrari; dismissed and writ
of procedento to justice of the peace or
dered.
F. b. Grigg against John Ganches &
Sons, Rarnishment; dismissed al plain
James b. Whitlock against Mary Weldee
Whitlock, divorce; dismissed for want OF
prosecution.
National Park bank against Alfred w.
Bishop, debt and requisition; Judgment
for plaintiff. NJ,
ply, divorce; dismissed at plalntlt's
cost.
r. A. Henson against Methodist Epis..
copal church, south, ct al, debt; death OF
plaintiff was suggested and leave was
given so make the administrator party
to the suit.
j. E. Fitzgeral against H. Williams and
the San Antonio Cold Storage company,
debt and to foreclOse mechanics lien;
dismissed at cost OF plaintiff.
Juries were called for by plaintiffs in
the cases of w. r. Elliott ct al, against
]. A. Reddick ct al, transferred from
Justice court; j. III. Tanner against West
ern Union Telegraph company, for dam
ages.
Final naturalization papers were grant
ed to Franz Schweden, a native or Ger
many. o,
This morning VIM II. VanRiper filed
suit against J. T. Lytle ct al, for debt.
Final papers were granted Jos. LOCK
and friedrich Wesp.
Twenty case were continued.
Judgement by default was given in the
following cases:
w. II. Jennings, jr., VS.. j. R. Murray,
on note. WV,
West End Lumber Company VS.. Wilk-
enSon & Bohemian. debt.
Albert LorSch & Co., VS.. Samuels IL
Roseman, on sworn account.
Max Freund & Co., vs. Samuels " Rose
man, on note.
S. NJ. Ellis VS.. r. Zimmerman, on two
nores and for damages.
l. Riely Gordon VS.. s. p. Maury, debt.
C. Shacklett VS.. Sidney futile, debt.
M. C. Shacklet VS.. City of San Anto-
Mo ct al, injunction.
The following cases were dismissed:
West End Lumber company VS.. j. s.
Thornton, debt and foreclosure OF lem,
at defendants cost.
A. b. Frank and Co. VS.. Fred Kerble,
Geo. S. Ronse & Geo. w. Russ. VS.. s. W.
Cohen, debt and foreclosure.
Goldfank, Frank & Co. VS.. j. w. Man
ming, note ana foreclosure.
VIM. Roberts VS.. Pat and Adam Flelds,
| on note and to foreclose lien.
+. r. Durrett VS.. +. L. Colwell ct al,
| note and foreclosure.
Claud H. Ayers VS.. John F. Bracken-
| ridge, partition.
| sorry.
| debt.
| j. f. Brown VS.. A. J. Seffel debt.
| Z. Dittmar VS.. NJ. Z. Lubbock ct al, on
| note.
| Stepp & Co. VS.. Gus Jennings, attach
ment and foreclosure of lien.
| American Hosiery Co. VS.. j. w. Crate &
| Co., debt as to Theakston.
| Goldfrank, Frank & Co. VS.. E. l.. Cage,
on note.
Eva Grundy VS.. Jesse Grundy, divorce.
| The following cases were dismissed:
| Beattie Manufacturing company, VS.,
| b. f. Yoakum, debt, at plaintiffs cost.
The ii. b. Claffln company VS.. Leopold
| M. Michael, punishment, at plaintiffs
cost.
Jennie Cans VS.. Simon Cans, divorce
and injunction, at plaintiffs cost.
| Twenty cases were before the court this
morning.