Evening journal., 1892-06-18
Judge Ball Has Not Final
Jurisdiction in Liquor Cases.
VIM HELMRArH WINS HIS CASE.

Cnnlthttu Judgment 20 the olnAilel titli
tole TO the detriment of the skin dealers
This will sot aside all Judgments and the
large creditors win probably got the
assets Of the company
Court Rules with Defendant.
Mr. Emmens, OF Lore a Emmons
moved for judgment Notwithstanding en-
affidavit of telenco, in the case of Quigley |
* Mullen against John J. Kennedy. This |
was an action on a promissory note. An |
affidavit of defence WAS filed In the case, |
setting forth shat Quigley q Mullen, the /
payees named in the note, which was |
renew the note when it be /
came due upon the payment /
TO them OF $25 AT the same time they /
refused Co accept She notes unless tho |
maker could procure good party to ON.
dorse the note before It was accepted by
them. and that upon The note falling due
Wood Ginder tendcred the f2a, whom
Quigloy 6 Mullen refused TO renew the
notes
W. II. Hayes resisted the motion on
two grounds First. that the affidavit
disclosed a good defence; second. that
/ Kennedy was Joint maker and that tho
undertaking was "a Joint one, not several.
and as the plaintiff had only sued one of
three makers. they could not recover In
/ this action The court was of the samo
opinion and refused the Judgment
Against the Liquor Men.
The court then resumed its consldera-
tion of the license eases.
Mr. prickett objected to renewal of
the license OF James w. Honer at the
southwest corner of Eleventh and Kirk.
wood streets. because he keeps a dis.
orderly place and sells liquor Co intoxi-
Gated persons
lie presented two remonstrances and
called Lawrence Degan 20 the
stand He said that there was n
saloon ne Eleventh and Pine streets, only
one-half square away, aud Ave saloons
from Preach TO Church streets on the
left Ii. had seen fighting outside there.
ard drunken persons around the place.
His main objection was chat there were
too many saloons there
john Emnnons thought there we're q
good many men better qualified to keep
q saloon than Mr. Homer
William S. Morris has hocn very much
annoyed by drunken persons passing
there lie did All think II necessary.
Sylvester Caldwell said that he mover
2 saw anT drunlIon persons in the saloon
Intoxicating liQuOr
Levi G. Bird. who represented the ap-
plicant, said that the place had been
licensed FOR ten years II had twenty
seven rooms and Is a hotel
Alfred Griggs, Of the Mccullough Iron
Company, stated that he went TO the
place frequently for lunch. and never saw
anything objectionable there
Hugh McCaherty, Grocer Ward and
John Kitchens, testified TO the good
oharacterof the place
Mr. prickett called Lovi Mckay. ono Of
Mr. Birds witnesses, whom he had not
b put on the stand lie said that he lived
e next door 20 Iiorncr's place six or seven
j years He had been annoyed by the
drunken men. To had seen two OF three
fights there They use his alley for
. improper purposes and prevent his wife
from sitting on the porch
Negroes After Privilege.
e Tho case of Brooks & Boyer. negroes
y who want 20 sell liquor at No $50 Hrcncl
e street. was next called up. II was tho lrsi
E negro case of the term. Mr. prickett pre-
2 sented rcmonstrances from the oilioia
2 board Of Ezion M r. Church and called
l. Rev. f. F. Parker and Robert H. Levi.
y to show that it was not only unneces
z sary, but would be detrimental 10 the
y large colored churches in the neighbor
hood
j. Frank Biggs. for the petitioner
called 6nowden Il Hamilton, one ef the
10 trustees, whose name appeared ON the
:, rcmonstranca He said he did moi
a sign the remonstrance but he did sigI
\ tho applicants license applications. III
n did not think the hotol would De de
/; trimonial 10 the church
=. a large number OF negro witnesses
~ were called, who testified TO the san'
x effect.
The License Cases Finished.
AS soon as court reconvened at
70 o'clock this morning, the license tgh
4. was continued
4. Mr Prickett objected 60 the applica
= tion of Mary f. Babeock, who wants y
6 sell the ardent beverage at the northwek
~ corner of Sixth and Walnut streets. III
10 claimed that she kept a noisy and disor
s. dcrly place Walter II. Hayes presonte,
petitions and witnesses in rebuttal.
The application of Harry Schnepf O
the Atlantic Garden, was opposed on tn
=, ground that he has sold liquor 20 minors
y, He was defended by Henry c. Turner.
y William Baxter q Bro. the whole
- salers at Fourth and Shiploy streets
\. came in for their share Of Law and Orde
y, Society critsism The allegation wa
- that tkey had sold liquor TO minors an
in less than one-half gallon lots. Wi
liam Salisbury, Jr., represented the al
plicant
10. The last ease was that Of Denn
n. Dougherty, At Lowering avenue an
~ Riddle streets Doughcrty is a who'll
~ saler who was accused Of selling le.
cn chan one-half gallon of liquor. Il.
da Attorney General Biggs and j. Fran
,er Biggs represented him.
Judge Cooch Sustained.
The judges rendered a decision su
ne tanning Judge of the Probate Cou
DE Cooch in the McComb viii case. The coi
lis testants claimed that cersoin clauses
ON the viii were filed in after It was execute
ED They were represented by w. S. lille
The will was represented by Ho
Charles b. Lore Judge Cooch decide
that the viii had been tampered wit
gar The case was carried TO the upper case {
e1- appeal, with above result
~ W. richardson Rule Discharged.
NV The court discharged the rule TO she