The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1892-12-10
THE VIEWS WERE THE POPE'S,
AND ARCHBISHOP sATOLLT WAS hU-
THoRIzED TO EXPRESS THEM

A"VfiAbGN 4 " hA1pc A"A"s
Tho Fnpnl Abiesate Says they were Cor
rcctly Set Forth in the Pamphlet that Has
Been PubIished-IIis Legatine Powers
Conferred In writinE-How tho Pamphlet
About the Faribault School Plan Got Out.
ST. LOUIS. Dec cit has been discovered
how Archbishop Satollis address reached the
public Archbishop Ireland Of st. Paul sent 1t
to the Rev. Father Phelan. editor OF the Vest
ern Wdtchman. a Catholic journal OF this city.
and he sold 1t to the press associations.
Friends Of Archbishop Ireland explain that he
felt a personal pride In the address because 1t
practically endorsed the Faribaut plan. OF
which he is the most prominent advocate but
he deemed 1t beneath his dignity to give out
directly news which was 80 much In his favor.
Father Pholan gladly assumed tho RESPONSE
bility. as the address endorsed the position on
the school question for which he has Lattled
70 long and successfully
Tho opponents OF tho Faribault plan have
been sorsly wounded by the address. and they
are trying. through their leader. Condo Fallen.
editor Of Church Progress. to show that Arch
bishop Satoli's words count only as the utter
ances OF an individual and do not at all repre-
sent tho IDEAS Of the Pope. Editor Fallen. in
an editorial to-day severely assailing Satoll.
uses this language:
Catholics may re at assured that Monsiznor
Satoli has no Authority to settle the school
question. to establish ecclesiastical courts. TO
adIudcate differences between Bishops and
PRIESTS. He is no more than any other indi-
Father phelan; when he read this was In
dignant at what he Gonsiacred an insult to the
ever saw. Such Talk ought to, be stopped by
the Church authorities here" he said. The
las n n
talk practically calls sntclli liar: HS has an.
der the man. who so viacd the ,Papnl ali.
company OF which our English speaking Vicar
General is President"
this c; 81 liz
Ollie clergy of America opposin the Farihauit
school system: H. was asked his opinion Of
isttSr re had received from Or. D. J. o'Gon:
the pamphlet from which the report sent out
from st Louis was taken. The letter! ts dated ted
th n t is Tho opnion Of Msr sato that Gs
r.spp1hGstheity Of the pamphlet rests with the
DO YOU mean to say that Dr. ,UConnel
holds that the suggestions Of Mgr. Sat oil are
not obligatory upon the Archbishops!" was
'eSs the %i
MSr. Leln1nH6F, VINO was WITH Archbishop
A"tfd %sf' the tn' Mgr sqo was
5saa and a. tEs sts
resolution which pledged adherence TO tho
rules laid down at the Council Of Baltimors
En- Mr. s: spe seh
the ,s spseeh
hs and was p%t a. adsptsd rom
81 Now the i1
taken direct from that pamphlet. Ii is a YER
sids:ing H tiat the panphiet lad, been IN our
possession twelve days and had boon distrib-
q: :: IF S5S!S oSsson
able s 4sfGd Mgr Il:
%ssE!y q ,sS Saa RshoSs are
poG n MEr satolli not represent the views
I've have nave slmost positive proc, that the
Holy Father does not favor the Tnribault plan.
while sEr satolli's susgesti .n are practical
sit It not no. eSident that the hsEarchy-,h.
Bishops In Ar; Amsriea-ars split UP over the
They are. not" Mgr. 2eirineer replied:
are agreed that It is Impossible to reconcile
! WAsHISGroN. Dee o., The attention OF Arch.
bishop Satoli who is at the Catholic nniy{er-
I SHY Ill lnlS Guy. WIS cGIltu tD-Qay 10 tno Nll-
waukes despatch about the views Of Arch
bishop KatIer. Speaking through d.; ,Q'Gor:
desire to enter into any, controversy, The
, Archiepiscopacy OF the United States had been
oN,riaily informed Of the Isgstine powers with
had laid, before, the .archbishops; in their
meeting in New York. the Pores views on tho
naIy cvsp, but we're correctly emboded in
the pamphlet, that had been made. public.
The, Holy Father earnestly desired that ths s
in. all matters where cardinal doc,
directly involved. Where there were NO paro-
chnl schools it was his wish that the children
Of Catholic parents should attend the public
schools and receive their religious teaching at
| home. Where there were parochial schools.
tbs Church preferred that the children should
nttenu them. though no compulsion was
| sought to be exercised.
! Archbishop Satoll desired to correct mis-
statement that had been sent out. that his in
! siructions and powers had been verbally con-
| ypyed. They were in writing and had been
nttes'ed by tho Cardinal Cardinal! Gibbons
and laid before tho Archbishons in New York.
On the schoo question alone the Pope's views
| had been verbally expressed. and thos. views
! had been accurately repeated by Archhis hop