The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1892-09-28
CALENDAR.
Supreme Court of the Hawaiian
Islands.
October Term, Beginning Mon.
day, October sd, 1892.

Chief Justice Judd presiding
Hon. Paul Neumann, Attorney
General; C. Creighton, Esq, Dep
uty Attorney-General.
Court will open at 10 a. NJ. on
Monday, October Sd, for Preli mi.
nary Business. Hawaiian Jurors
attend at l P. NJ, and foreign Ju.
rors when notified.
HAWAIIAN JURY.
The Queen vs.. Naaieono alias Aieono
maintaining lottery scheme; appeal from
Honolulu Police Court. Nawahi-Kaulia
for defendant.
The Queen VS.. Naaieono alias Aieono,
Kanoho and Hookano; assault and bat
terry on public officer appeal from Homo
lulu Police Court. Nawahi-Kaulia for
defendants.
The Queen vs.. Kahakuaohelo alias
Ahakuelo and Ane (w) adultery; appeal
from Honolulu Police Court. Kane for
defendants.
The Queen vs. Aqua; assault and bat
terry; appeal from Honolulu Police
Court
The Queen VS.. Kaoihanaole maintain
ing lottery scheme; appeal from Homo
lulu Police Court.
The Queen VS.. Hookaaku, Julia and
Moses Kahulu; larceny, 4th degree; ap.
peal from Honolulu Police Court. Kane
for defendants.
The Queen vs.. Xxi vagrancy; appeal
from Honolulu Police Court. Kaulia for
defendant.
The Queen VS.. Kiwai maintaining lot
terry scheme; appeal from Honolulu Po-
lice Court.
The Queen VS. Manu-; maintaining
lottery scheme; appeal from Honolulu
Police Court.
The Queen VS.. Hoopii; burglary.
The Queen VS.. 81. f. Poor; embeZzle-
ment.
The Queen VS.. H. F. Poor; embezzle.
ment.
The Queen vs.. II. F. Poor; embezzle-
ment.
The Queen VS.. H. F. Poor; embezzle-
ment.
The Queen vs.. III. F. Poor; embezzle-
ment.
The Queen vs.. K. K. Maawe and Wal
lua; larceny, I'd degree.
The Queen vs. Lot II. Lane and Jos
Keaunui; perverting Justice.
Alice K. Ayers vs.W. Mahuka; breach
of promise. Magoon for plaintiff.
Hawai- K. George VS.. Hanakaulani
Holt; ejectment. Hartwell tor plaintiff !;
Rosa for defendant.
MIXED JURY.
G.. Fishel vs.. B. III. Kahananui; as
sumpsit Curry waived July Term, 1887.
Neumann for plaintiff; Rosa for defend
ant.
Talula L. Hayselden vs. Wahineaea
wv; ejectment. Ashford for plaintiff (;
Nawahi for defendant.
Antoine Petro VS.. c.. P. Kanakanui
assumpsit; appeal from Bickerton j., at
Chambers. Brown for plaintiff; Magoon-
Kahookano for neutrality-suspicious..
Manuel da Costa vs.. Paakaula; DAM
age; appeal from Police Court of Homo
lulu. Ashford for plaintiff appellant
Rosa for defendant.
Tai Kee ct al. VS.. J. L. Kaulukou eli
al; assumpsit; appeal from Police
Court of Honolulu. Magoon for plaintiff
Kaulukou for defendant-appellant.
Oahu Railway and Land Company vs..
L. Kapu ct al; ejectment. Hatch for
plaintiff; Smith for defendants
j. 1. Dowsett ct al. VS.. Kalua ct al.
ejectment. Brown for plaintiffs; Kaulu.
kou for defendants. ,..-s-.
Margaret Campbell ct al. VS.. N. Hoo.
kano ct al; assumpsit. Monsarrat for
plaintiffs; Kane for defendants.
James w. L. Mcclure vs.. Erns,
Schwabach malicious prosecution. Ash
ford for plaintiff; Hatch for defendant.
FOREIGN JURY.
The Queen vs. Chin Hee and sever
others; attempting to land at Port o
Honolulu; appeal from Police Court o
Honolulu. Magoon for defendants.
The Queen vs.. All Hop and three 9th
ers; attempting to land at Port of Homo
lulu; appeal from Police Court of Homo
lulu; Ashford for defendants.
The Queen VS.. All Hong and AZ others
attempting to land at Port of Honolulu
Hartwell-Castle for defendants.
The Queen vs.. All Sen; opium in pos
session; appeal from Honolulu Polic
Court. Smith for defendant.
The Queen VS.. Kamimura kintaro
malicious injury and mischief; appea
from Eva Police Court.
The Queen vs.. George Rose; larceny
1st degree.
The. Queen VS.. All Hum; maintainin,
lottery scheme; appeal from Honolulu
Police Court.
The Queen vs.. Albert Ryan; larceny
4th degree; appeal from Honolulu Polio
Court.
The Queen vs. Henry Seyer; larceny
I'd degreee.
The Queen vs.. Louis NJ. Johnson
common nuisance; appeal from Homo
lulu Police Court.
The Queen VS.. All Sun; maintainin
lottery scheme; appeal from Honolulu
Police Court.
M. w. McChesney & Sons VS.. Wilde
Steamship Company; damage; appes
from Police Court of Honolulu. Har
we'll for plaintiffs; Hatch for defendant
appellant.
Pow Kee vs.. Wilder Steamship Co.
damage; appeal from Police Court c
Honolulu. Hartwell for plaintiff; Hate
for defendant-appellant.
Hop Hing & Co. vs.. Wilder STEAMSHIP
Co.; damage; appeal from Police Coul
OF Honolulu. Hartwell for plaintiffs
Hatch for defendant-appellant.
Awana VS.. Wilder Steamship Co
damage; appeal from Police Court
Honolulu. Hartwell for plaintiff; Hate
for ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.
Z. l.. Carter, assignee and attorney i
fact. vs.. Oahu r. R. & Land Co
Thurston & Frear for plaintiff; Hatch Il
defendant.
A. R. Freitas by NJ. R. Freitas, guar,
ian, VS.. John F. Hackfeld; damag