The Kinsley graphic. [volume] (Kinsley, Kan.) 1890-1940, 1892-08-26
HorH SIDES

ward utscuss the Ethics OF tine Home
To the News. as pre-emiuenuy the
Eairest and most liberal democratic pa
per in the south, + send this, my second
communication. trusting that 1T VIII Doe
published and answered in the spirit of
fairness and kindness in which il is Of
fer@d.
lam in receipt of the News OF July
81 aud note therein your emiEcutlF
courteous reply TO my communicatiou
which appears in the same issue.
Your answer 'iu1" is suttieiently cE-
Plicit. bat tine reasoning You uss 70 sup
port such an answer uppcars4 In my
humble Judgment specious and sophis-
ticaL
Allow me to iutrude upon your value
able space for a reproduction OK the
original communication of mine with
the quotation of that portion Of your
criticism TO which took exception as
follows:
From a criticism in your columns of "a
communication appearing therein clip
as follows:
The yrarIzz1ru us o. party OF the FIRST part aaJ
Mr.. Carnegie as % party OF tins second rlrt Gu
rar iar1 partnership The patty ol the urst
second part the plant and material The party
OF -le urst part IS 90 receive o. sr.Dulateu SUM
as prohLsi tHe party OF Inc second pay We.
remains The two pAT Ties stand upon t-enl-y1i
grounds. Each IS uouuL 10 plata contract for
tho period of liuitari1u-lo longer At the e--
p1ra-.on OF rhe partnership each ts restored 20
liberty tulnallg new EHlrluerahip ur NOT as he
may elect
Are Won not mistaI5cuP Did not Mr.
Carnegie simply invest superior cum
ming and ava aptitude for bossiug or
mBuHgiug2 Was he not q very poor
man twenty years ago? Did not his
Iaborers. skilled and uusSilted, produce
or create with their labor, tire plant,
material aud Mr.. Carucrie's many mil-
lions? Is not this wealth legally SIR
Carnegic's only and solely because tne
law protects robbers in the possession
and enjoyment Of stolen Ep-ds' is
there NOT iu Justice q joint ownership,
in fact, of the wealth jointly produced
by brain and brawu9 Please do not
evade or dodge, bat answer speci6cui-
ly.
To this You answer first;
aIr Carucsla-z financial condition twenty
years ago has EhEur ta au with Tho PROPOSE
tiaa tle News WAS discussing .1 tne sdltlriud
from which you have mlde Che extracts
From this statement yuu must ALLOW
ula to- respectfully dissent The priuci-
pal point ] avn trying to mako i=r that
when Mr.. Carnegie and his skilled
lahnrers entered into q partnership Mr.
d CarucgiC had neither plant mo- material,
buL that thcv have since been produced
| 10y the toll of Ii- Iaborers, ''ths party
+ of the first rart." and If it is c1uteUded
that this is not tho set Of hands whose
. labor was murt-ayed fbouacdf by Mr.
Carnegie for plant and material " tilcu
some other set of hands produced all the
wealth Mr. Carnegie owns and their
/ pros, ,et''S --'-' was '.'N --.
-o ----,t u. a.
can -t-7' --'-g -i-l "l3---'s EL,-ll- -,'5 ?
"7 am -'li --- N1-'- -.- -7
-Ll'.'i 1l- III, --- 49, ~
7 80 must "D7'i -
] others.
lou - -. i,l'i - +t,.. .-
--o-l- - I-
{ o-
Ing ''N '7 -N
tu l'.- r,. o. .,..t.r.t t.. . .1. 60,
,t,. --.rr. Of -r. .r5.-.-- over and abgv. no
wages s.Hfe-. it hr4 ac-e1tcd as d. just gouueu-
sat-or. tH1t iuterg-f must DE organic ana re-
e'pf' AL j.. LHe i .1-. '.i'' - y 7 --
r-- -r-- 7, D. 1-5--g f-. III a. i4i .-s.lr.- fH..
Mr Caruora ANA his a--11iat-s are plrru .rs .H
the saviHsz ana nrr DUAL property ot taa labor
efa. 9ltH.-a lA, L--' NstL ta' H-.a -..N
5,g s.,- r-.'- -1,.r, .9,. r-.r 81 I4vir- .rrrs
Is ea-rrr.,ra.-7ss pure .aaI simple
I'm this statement or ut least n all O.
10 but the last sentence. You are strictly
logical and frir. BuE Mr. Carnegie has
had living an this period and % much
better one tliau ltis yvJrIsusu have had
and the has spent much more money
than any one OF his gv1rIzmen baz spent
Here we must pause to make point
Mr.. Carnegie is not entitled TO as much
to eat'uud as much money to spend az
all of his vyorIzmen together but oul 3
TO as much as each one OF his worlsmer
has had frrr1u an av-raga DHsarvirg q
I sr-s 3. srr a. rH .1.. s.t
tHla ttiS Dr. N.'- '- lo,i-iN' tli"eF Ll''t@'l
OF nHN-ug amy interest an ms FFpfifLlei
personal uruuerLV OF savings on account
81 tF,,. ,,49t f5.s -.4,-.-- rs-at, 0rn ,F tbarr
r. -.- -. - -
see how they stand aL tne present ti.t-
any one of his yvur.umeu anything Ills,
tho amount of personal property thai
Mr. Carnegie ha-t Is not his persona
property and residence e-tHfe- AND
7 grounds worth moIe than the purs1ua
property and savings of an his work
. men torefHar- j, he entitled To aul
. more than the average for one OK hi
vvorI-ui mp That still leaves the join
ownership Df the steel works and Air
. Carnegie millions of dollars unrecpg
uized and Lhc property all in his hands
But this i- NOT communism pure amt
l simple Iu fact there IS no commuu
ism about IT, Communism demands