Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1892-03-08
-. colnage Men Of Both Parties
Highly Elaied at the Result Of
Yesterdays Proceedings.
,suoeaAric GOLD MEMS DISMAL
roaCeoolNes.
Three Days Set Apart by the House
for the Consideration Of the
Blaud illll.
}, r,suapa to tho SrwSi
1uE FREE COINAGE ISSUE.
:, y,u be Disposed Of by tho House
a-f,,. the National Convention

coinage Issue VIII NV Wv ~
men Of both parties, who have been
soplpg 1t would be postponed until
A XII he elections, are tonight con.
y,,eei that the issuo must be disposed
NV The House before the date Of the
IN ,,iisusl convention. The free coin
,sr men OF both parties are, OF course,
n bi,bly elh,od. The gold men IN the
II Dim5rratic party are filled with dls-
mi lorehOdlngs; while antl'iree coin
ace Republicans, who comprise 50
rsfant. Of the Republican member
"A Nm in the House, are disposed 10 view
. leAluation with complacency. The
vote today indicates that the House
vilianiuly pass the Bland bill, 70 de-
e,iye and overwhelming was the
victory Of the advocates OF free coin
h was n significant feature Of the
rfictedlngs, that, on all the disputes
ihal arose on the parliamentary ques-
ton, the nntl-iree coinage mon did
nssi Of the talking. To one unfami-
| lif with political methods, tho con.
ta,ion would have been Irresistible,
Iher listening TO the denuucia.
u.n OF Speaker Crlsp's rullngs,
the impassioned Oratory, TO
ihe difeful predictions Of those
orp0scd to the Bland bili, that the tree
t.inagc men were tdsbo swept away In
aghlrlwind OF popular Indignation.
Yet, when the vOts came, not ON the
silver resolution alone, but on all tho
| nIillary questions, the free coinage
usu came TO the front in an unbroken
JhIlanX, and by vote Of over two TO
Joe, routed their opponenls. On the
1T and vital proposition, that settling
I,at three days for consideration OF
lie Bland bill, the free coinage men
Won by the overwhelming vote OF 100
bsi.
In advocacy OF his appeal from the
4 3.,isiOn OF the Chair, Tracy said that
ivOuld be an unfortunate preoedoutto
make, that the committee on rules,
consisting practically Of three mem
len, could come Into the House and
force upon three hundred odd mem.
hef. the consideration Of any reaolu-
. ton they might desire TO call up. The
House should proceed with great eau
4 ton. The eyes OF the entire country
II were on tho House this day,
and this resolution upon n matter
j which concerned the people more
than any question that had come before
Il C0ngfess for thirty years. with re-
n glri 10 tho question OF reading the
i journal, II was customary 10 read the
i Journal every morning before proceed.
Ing to business. Knowing this, many
members were absent, and n fair OPP
pohunliy should be given them to
reach tho Capitol.
NE YIELDED FIVE MINUTES
10 Mr.. Fitch, who seconded his
Colleagues remarks, prcfaclng his own
remarks with an expression Of the
highest respect for the fairness OF tho
ehalr, but he c0ncurred fully in what
mai been said in regard To the danger
/ o. The precedent which II was proposed
% set. Those Democratic who had sat
heiei over and over again demanding
we reading Of the journal in tho last
House, knew that the demand had al
ways been granted, and that, In "A
Drmocrstic House In case like this,
mat the refusal should bo made, was
unfair to his mind rs anything that
lA1 teen done In the lntt House. There
tHa good deal Of talk in his State
Hooul n premature or snap convention.
Hlhere was ever anything premature
ot unexpected to those who opposed
lnesllvor legislation, IL was the snap.
ligoi this resolution on them before
we reading Of the journal. Tho repre-.
tnlallyes from New York would stand
" what they thought right with the
anie steadfastness and courage that
usy had stood by tho present Speaker,
shsh, as the gentleman from Georgia,
Ie had protested against things which
stfe no more unjust than was the
\ uuhging In OF this resolution before
zoe reading OF the Journal. The party
s,sel something 10 the Democrats Of
aew York. II had no right TO load
ulen uown, aud from them II must
Expect rs IL deserved, most emphatic
lrolesl.
Mr.. COCHRAN,
wnlinuinF, expressed himself as OPP
Nted To illhustcring methods. Tho
taling OF the Chair, no said, was n
dangerous one. Until the journal
st read no member could tell whether
~s House was legally In session.
MI Craig Of Texas Inquired whether
,mntion to adjourn would DO in order
helore reading the Journal.
me speaker replied that II always
hAu been 50 held, aud never ques.
uoneui and tae came language applies
s !" lnls rule ss applies to n motion to
Mr., Lockwood Of New York said
~ ~, recollection was that, during the
iNly'bTst Congress, tho Democrats
always successfully protested against
NY business being transacted before
i Inv reading and approval Of the
mr. Cate lugs OF Mississippi closed
sue ueba,e on behalf OF the committee
yn tulte and concluded his remarks
o oy moving to lay Mr.. Tracy's appeal
CRISP STATES THE QUESTION.
y Before putting the question Speaker
NIllap stated the question and his nosl.
OF" ,I.il ne said In part: "rhe rule pro.
'uei mat It shall always be ia order
~ Call up for consideration report
n , mo committee on rules. The
iu'es also provide that It shall always
10 W Ordtr 10 move to adjourn, to en-
,s tram motion to Tx day to which
Wv rouse shall adjourn, Or TO take n
'v,s' llalways has been held, 90 far
~ we Chair knows, that the Houss
'fb.y GG1JpuFn before the Journal IN read.
-"s Shalr calls attention 10 rule 20 as