The morning news., 1892-03-26

that gentleman. as he was paired with Mr..
Sanford republican,, they thereby lost two
votes. ltis also intimated that the result
will be close, but they entertain hopes Of
winning.
AN ANALYSIS OF THE VOTE.
In view Of the extreme closeness Of the
two sides on the silver question as disclosed
by last nights vote an analysis OF the tie
vote on the test motion Of Mr.. Burrows OF
Michigan - lay the Bland bill on the table
will be interesting. On this motion each
side secured 145 votes and thirty-five men,
bers are put down as not voting, OF
which number the Congressional Record
shows that twenty were announced
to be paired on this vote, leaving
fifteen impaired. OF the 14s votes cast in
favor OF the motion SO were cast by the
democratic members Of the House and 66
by the republican members The negative
vote shows the names Of eleven republicans,
the other l37 being either democrats or ali-
ancemen. TheIunexpectedly large showing
OF democratic votes against the silver bill
comes from the following states: New York
10, Pennsylvania 10, Wisconsin 7.
Massachusetts, 7. Iowa 5, New
Jersey. Ohio and Maryland each;
Illinois, Connecticut and Michigan 8
each; New Hampshire, Rhode Island,
Louisiana and Minnesota 2 each; South
Carolina. l (Mr. BrawleyJ; Delaware, l;
West Virginia. MIR. WILSON,; Missouri, l
(Mr. Cobb, and California. (Mr. Geary).
THE REPUBLICAN OPPOSITION.
The eleven republican votes opposed to
Mr.. Burrows motion are scattered over the
far west, only one vote, that OF Vincent A.
TAYLOR OF Ohio. coming from east of the
Mississippi river. Kansas contributed two
In Messrs. Broderick and Funston, South
Dakota two more Messrs Picker and Jol-
ley while the other SIX votes came from as
many different states: Colorado, Mr.. Town
send; Wyoming, Mr.. Clark; Nevada, Mr..
Bartine; California, Mr.. Bowers; Idaho,
Mr.. Sweet, and Oregon, Mr.. Herman.
The pairs announced were as follows; Mr..
Enoch with Mr.. Tarsney, Mr.. Sanford with
Mr.. Elliott, Mr.. Durborow with Mr..
Hooker of Mississippi, Mr.. Morse with Mr.
Cstchings E. b. Taylor of Ohio with Mr..
Oates, Mr.. Van Horn with Mr.. Johnston Of
South Carolina, Mr.. Henderson of Illinois
with Mr.. Peel, Mr.. Rusk with Mr.. Como
ton and w. A. Stone with Mr.. Jones of
Virginia. the names first given in each cases
being members who would have voted
against the bill and the latter those who
would have voted for the measure.
THOSE WHO FAILED TO VOTE.
Following is list Of the members who
were not announced as paired and who
failed to vote either way: Messrs. Campbell,
Wadsworth and Stahlneclxer OF New York,
Forman, Wike and Springer of Illinois,
Cooper Of Indiana, Clover of Kansas,
Cheatham OF North Carolina, Donovan Of
Ohio Shell of South Carolina, Herbert Of
Alabama, Lester of Virginia, Boatner of
Louisiana, and Enloe Of Tennessee. Before
the vote was fipally announced Messrs.
Herbert and Enloe asked leave to vote, but
under the rules they we're refused. Their
votes would have Offset each other, thus
leaving thirteen men on whose vote in an
absolutely fun House the result would have
hinged. OF these thirteen members Messrs.
Glover, Cooper, Lester of Virginia, Shell
and WIke. on a subsequent test vote, voted
with the silver men and MIR.
Wadsworth with the anti-silver men.
while pairs in favor Of the bill
were announced on the part OF Messrs.
Boatner and Forman, and against the bill
for Mr.. Stahluecker. These announcements
show seven more votes for the silverites and
two more for the anti-silverites. leaving
Timothy J. Campbell of New York, Mr..
Cheatham, a republican OF North Carolina,
Mr.. Donovan Of Ohio. and MIR. Springer
still unaccounted for.
ONE MAJORITY FOR FREE COINAGE.
This on an absolutely full vote leaves at
! least one majority for the silver men; but
| in this connection it must be stated that a
| full vote is practically unknown in the
| House. and that the silver mon concede that
when it comes to a very close vote they are
less able than their opponents to count on
every member. The situation is
less encouraging to the silver men
when they came to consider their future
course. as the large showing made has un-
| questionably strengthened their opponents,
] and some men who have always voted in
! favor OF free coinage have since expressed
themselves as disinclined. for political
reasons, to further push the matter. To
what extent this feeling would influence
subsequent votes is unknown.
DULL IN THE HOUSE.