New-York tribune., 1892-03-31

Mr. coudcrt-Bnt l won't be burc1, NJ. Reilly YOU
! rnust understand that >iI. ~ ,,
none Of US be bulcd. and l will not allow you TO con-
tisdict me You are here servant: not n'Y mast
and you will keep quiet when t'A. NOV" '''
what were YOU going say about iLtclli-eh1 men =,
Mr. Coudcrt-I was going TO say uat Mheh Io'iU -
,, ,eod tba, On that 22d dly Of september Isaac H.
MAYNARD took from the Cont - - ONCE an c'c
| ton return, lawfully deposited !hcfc ~ o'
way TO the state Bolrd OF 'aiN''''I,
and HANDED IT. back to storm Fmans. who had no h" I
to il: than have, by this act preventing 1t rom % [
lawful destination and having it, lawful ch'ct anu WIN
saw that Judge Maynard had ''t silent !" "'' e
at the hral meeting OF the State Boi4u VI =
| o,s when the members Of that Bolfd IT'i''
that the reason that they counting the Mlou WI
,ncato was bccause they other return before U
! he knowing that the reason why th'N Ne'o 49," -,
| correct certificate because he f'' '"''''' 49,
| and when read the statement o'cF NJ
own signature that he done this Deliberately an" "
pursuanee Of a conspiracy entered into 10y h'n ana ny wv
state Board Of Canyassers not 20 receive inc con-
! icete from, Dutchcss County, knew thd' ~ "'I '
| ted a shameful, outrageous crime. Ih"' ""' ''''F
| me Mr. Reilly II it Is not enough Tor you
Wbctber the acts of Judge Maynard were
cnoupb for Reilly or not, one Woul'
have thought that this speech from ME-
| Coudert was; but it wasn't lie "'"'
~ o,,sira IN
| o-po,'t YOU make a distinction between reluSHt' " "
| ,ecrIve the certificate and removing tl A'-i.'' |
| instance Rice refused TO receive IT, u
whether his act came within the Penal Code or hoo'
o-But you know that the state Bcliu q N~H"'' ~ ~.
bod decided A-Essctly and they did IL oil Hl''"',u
advice That is what makes his case 81 pau' i''a
client is disposed to do unlawful act ''@' j "o
why his lawyer should do 1t for him. , h,,
| Q-But do you not know that II judge N'Sn1 ~
ro rturnod tina, certificate it would have taken the i"o
~ the Mvlod certificate A.-Certiiny' u ""u'"
| Orben II the MyIod certificate was proper anu "''
| corrected certificate improper Judge MaynSu "o"' ~
| nd c,r
frud and the correct certificate wac uhe uu' wv ~
| ,orr.o he would lose his case IL he had u bau ''''
AYcs but the Mylod certificate was fraud anu 'n'
corlec: certificate the true one anu oi ''"'' "
| would lose hi, II he had one. ,.,,
O-supposc Judge Maynard thought his act was ''-"
would no, the fact that his conscience approved nm "'
into YOUR consideration Of the gravity Of his a''' A.
Yes but IL would show that his smndaIu VI ''"''
WIS altogethr wrong. and 1; would show tat ne oue w
| TO employed TO declare the IL" Vi "'o " "
court OF last resort. -,
o-Do YOU condemn q judge merely because ne mas
bundered! A-Oh. II we put judges INTO ~. ''oS &
time they mistakes the peni''nia'is "ouu w ''
Of them. ,,, 60 On,
you were prcent at the public meeting called 10 OPP
,o.o tho regular Democracy the time oi LoaIhs INC
State Convention, you noti A-fe,' -.
o-Itwas an ant.early conventions A-OIsNN 1c''
sir; anti-snep. 49, ., ,.o,, oo. a,
Q.-You are counsel Tor WiI'h " "'O'' w."
A.-Yes. ..,, .
Yes.
MORE ToNFoOLERY SAYS GENERAL IL SIEp'
General Hustled" Now comes more of this tom
foolery about politics What difference does II
make whether Grace hates Hill and Iilh h""s
Cleveland? How does that bear On tie moral
oralitv ot Mavnard's acts {? The question here Is
did he steal that return or DIDN'T he. If he stcie
it. he is guilty II he didn't, he isn't Now why
all this bunconbe talk about politics ,r
hon, Mr. Polly made this tcflalailNH. w
claim that politics is at the bottom oi
this whoe business. None Of the i"Ss cntSe1 n;Gse,
is dsputed There is no single fact IN dispute.
We will admit that now. But II we can sno"
that the Bar Association movement mas p1en "a
political conspiracy against '9dge May '''u "'''
Senator Hill, il is important. :,
This statement created the utmost as'ohlSh-
ment II fully indicates the dcmorall1cd conuition
of tile Senate thieves. MT. Houdett eN ,t M
was not long continued lie admitted tnaI nc
believed that Ar Grace did not particularly love
Mr. Hill, but he SAID that LIE hiIseH im ,,o,,IS m
not hostile to judge Maynard ana "oItu I
70 perceive any excuse for Muynards acis.
Tie examination of William A. jameson, James
G. Carter and Clifford A. Hand followed that oi
Mr. Coudert. They said SO many good things ana
so many true ones. that ii seems shame nov 10
give their testimony i'll full, but 1t was suDstan-
fiallv a repetition of that given by Mr.. coudcTt
Nothing new was brought out. The lntention OF
every question by The Democratic counsel was 10
get an answer that would cover 'Ic points hi'oe
In Judge MaynardS letter. auu llc tHcD, was W
draw out anGihiatins replies. Mr. ',1a CA,-
gushed manner which always charlc'criI's
his apnearapcc had frequently 20 remind ulc
counsel that although the facts were a. t''F
stated them in their question, the infeicnccs tcy
sought to impute 10 them could not b. allo"f'.
Each Of tho Bar Association representatives,, re-
| plying 10 questions from Senator q 'ohhor' zen
| ator SaXton and General Husted, declared posi-
| lively that there could be no doubt mat JulIe
| Vavnard's act was an act Of larceny plainly com
mittcd for the purpose Of enabling Tie State Boaid
of Canvassers to give an electoral certificate from
the XVIII District TO "A defeated candidate ana 'd,
| none of the facts alleged hy judge MaNhaId
| in defence of his conduct even If true, could ph-
| decision Of the Court Of Appeals was to conniihd
| the State Board Of Canvasscrs not 70 canvass
| thc NylcI return, because il was fraudulent, nut
! 10 canvass that other return sent up y them hy
order of the court and In pursuance OF he statue,
| which other return was the one that judge
MAYNARD had distracted from the office Of the Con
! troiler: that Storm Emans had taken away from
| the Governors chamber, and that FRANK Illcc had
! removed from his own files and handed back 10
| Emans
RrDGwAYs DIsGEACEFuL REMARKS
The examination Of Mr.. Hand was distinguished
| by disgraceful proceeding on the part OF Mr'
| Ridgway lie asked Mr.. Hand If lie knew Wheeler
| n Peckham. Mr. Hand said, Yes.
| What do you know Of him. demanded the
| lawyer.
Il know him 70 be distinguished lawyer, an
| excellent citizen and highly intelligent man.
| Has he any law pracuccY
"Of course he has. a very large one
Are YOU sure Of that -
(prf