San Antonio daily light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1886-1907, 1892-10-08
THE COURTS.
New Suits ETIed, Cases Disposed or
and New CiIZeus,

The following cases have been handled
! by Judge King in the Forty fifth district
court since last report:
Negley Bros. VS.. Galveston, Harris
burg & San Antonio railway, transferred
! from Thirty seventh district court; judg-
mpnt as per agreement.
! William Il. Tiers & Co. VS.. Il. kiol-
! baSSa, debt; Judgment for plaintiff.
A. PapeSehi VS.. CammillO TOmaSio, APP
peal from justice court; dismissed at
plaintiffs cost.
State of Texas VS.. Frank Demmng ct
al, judgment niS; dismissed at defend
ants cost.
EdgewOod Distillery Co. VS. Ed. Fro
boeSe, appeal from justice court; dismiss
ed at plaintiffs cost.
Taylor VS.. Eaighn e. HOrner. accepted
and protested draft; continued for SER
vice.
This morning business was transacted
as follows:
Thomas Nelson VS.. S. w. James ct al,
on note and to foreclOSe lien; exception
sustained and leave given plaintiff to
amend.
Biestein & Richter VS.. Max Cohen,
garnishee: appeal from justice court; mo-
ton TO dismiss appeal overruled.
International Building and Loan aSso-
citation VS.. First Colored Baptist church
of San Antonio, debt and foreclosure:
motion to quash citation sustained.
San Antonio National bank VS.. wizard
Simpson and j. r. Tendick. on note; mo-
ton TO Quash citation overruled.
f. b. Kemp VS.. +. n. RIedel, debt and
damages; motion to Quash citation over
ruled.
+. f. Collins Manufacturing company
VS.. Nelson Mackey, punishment; dis
missed at plaintiffs cost.
Kate CarutherS VS.. James CarCthers,
u i'd for Nlain ti
William Fletcher VS.. Patrick Fletcher,
debt and foreclosure of lien; motion to
dismiss overruled.
D. & A. Oppenheimer VS.. Jos. Welt
mann. on prOmiSSOry note; motion for
new trial overruled.
ThoS. J. NJ. Williams VS.. Alice Will
liams, divorce: judgment for plaintiff.
THIRTY SEVENTH DISTRICT COURT.
Judge Noonan has disposed OF tine fol-
lowing cases in his court since last re-
port:
Louisa Juliard VS. John Phillip Weik
ct al. to try title and for damages; plain
tiff granted leave to file second amended
original and first supplemental petition.
Exception to plaintiffs amended petition
sustained.
Gordon & Laub VS.. Thomas. F. Brady,
appeal from justice court; placed on jury
docket.
Robert E. Stafford VS.. Ben Mauerman,
Jr, to,try title and for damages continued
by consent.
Hyman Blum VS.. E. A. Giraud, dam
ages; continued by consent
San Antonio National Bank VS.. G.. De-
laney, ct al, promiSsory note: continued
until next nom jury call.
Charlie Ley VS.. Galveston, Harrisburg
& San Antonio railway, damages; set for
October 10.
Peter Sturm ct al, VS.. F. Hensel par
tition; set for October s.
William Roberts VS.. Carl Richter, to
try title and for damages: judgment for
defendant.
Charles Schultze VS.. Wilhelmine
Schultze, appeal from justice court; iudg-
ment for defendant.
Estey Organ Co. ct al. VS.. T. p. Mccall
ct al, damages; dismissed at cost of de-
PENDANT. Johanna Stoves.
&. FURY VS.. Nettie FURY, divorce:
leave given plaintiff to file amended petit
ton.
John c. Davis vs. Il. A. Edwards ct al,
damages: continued.
Dolores Clark VS.. VIM. White, appeal
from justice court; continued.
Wagner & Chabot VS.. Embry & William
son, sworn account; judgment for plain
tiff
Clara Bandraon VS.. Charles Bandraon,
divorce: judgment for plaintiff.
NJ. Half & Bro. VS.. D. c. Lea, on
promiSSory note: Judgment by default.
M. Half & Bro. VS.. s. n. Steinhardt,
on promSSory note; continued for SER
vice.
LIP. Schaefer VS.. George w. Deits,
debt and to foreclOse lien; continued for
service.
Mamie Ross ct al. VS.. San Antonio
Street Railway Co., damages; continued
| to make parties,
Final citizenship papers were granted
yesterday in the Thirty seventh district
| court as follows:
Paul Yahns, subject of emperor of Ger
many; II. II. Hardy, citizen of the re-
| emperor of Germany; Carl Maiwald, sub
| ject of emperor of Germany; Robert
| kurtZ subject of emperor of Germany.
| Final papers were granted to the fol-
| lowing persons this morning: Fritz BOu-
mann, subject OF the Emperor of Germany
! witnesses, r. A. Ackermann and j. K
Cloud: Gustav Wagenfuhr, subject of the
Emperor Of Germany, John Stappenbecb
and Anton Adam, witnesses; Jos. Kohr
lSubject of Emperor of Germany. T P
Mccall and Anton Adam, witnesses: j. J
A. Bauer, subject of the Emperor of Ger.
many, August Santleben and George
ECkenroth, witnesses; Carl Kruger
subject of the Emperor Of Germany. J. j
A. Bauer and Geo EckenrOth, witnesses;
Joseph Frank James, subject of tn,
Queen of England. | Charles Baker anC
Claud Wright, witnesses; Wilhelm Dial
huert, subject Of the Emperor of Ger.
many, f. Hensel and Henry Clemens, wit
neSses: B. ArStein, subject of the En-
perOr of Russia, j. Strauss and C. A. Den
ny, witnesses.
Judgment was rendered in the followin,
cases as follows:
f. +. Collins Manufacturing compan,
, vs. Frank Brown, transfer from justic
court, for plaintiff.
James Prendergast VS.. Mary Simpson
debt and foreclosure of lien, motion I
quash citation dismissed: case diSmisse
at plaintiffs cost.