The Democratic advocate. [volume] (Westminster, Md.) 1865-1972, 1892-05-28
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.
NO. 1927 EQUITY.
Tn the Circuit Court for Carroll County.
m N q unncnn Rnitt ct al.

T, ,bo C;rcuit Court for Carroll County.
Jobn II Raitt VS.. C. Hanson Raitt ct al.
TLo ob;ect Of the Petition of Mary Jane
Raitt. Executrix of Z. Hanson haie'' ia'I VI
Carroll county, Maryland, deceased. nled IN
,L;s cause. is to obtain an order oil Court
snbrooating the petitioner, as the legal rep
rasaptotiye of said G.. Hanson Raltt 10 lhe
cred;tors of Nathan Raitt, late OF Carroll
county. deceased, and requiring the trustees
in the above cause to pay over to her, aller
deduc,ipg expenses and proper commissions,
the balance of the undistributed proceeds Oh
sale from the real estate on,
The Petition states that on the 9uIh 9ay VI
Anr;I 1883. n certain Nathan Raitt, died IN
TarroI comfy. Maryland, intestate and I'M
married. seized of certain real estate IN said
county: that said real estate was sold by
r Hanson Raitt and G. w. Crapster, trns-
taas annointed by decree OF the court, ior
ee Ia7 10 and that the sum of 50, l6i. % oil
so;d sales were distributed among the heirs
law of said Nathan, leaving the undistribu-
ted sum of 81 ,020.00, in the hands OF the
trustee in the cause; that letters OF admin
istration were granted to the SAID Y; hanson
Raitt by the Orphans Court OF Carroli
county, on the personal estate oil saiu
Nathan, who qualified, and entered upon the
dnties of administration thereof; that IN
Raitt. died in Carroll county, leaving VIII,
bv which he devised and bequeathed all his
Dronerty to his wife, the petitioner, and APP
nointed her executrix of said will; that she
anplied for and obtained from the Orphans
Court of Carroll county, letters testamentary
ON said will, and as such executrix settled on
the 25th day of April, 1892, the first and hna
account of her husband, as administrator OF
said Nathan Raitt, from the books and papers
left by said deceased; that SAID settlement
shows a balance due her husband S estate oil
81, 114.S5, after accounting and charging MN
with the entire assets and personal estate OF
his decedent: the petition prays that the
said undistributed proceeds of said real estate
now in the hands of the trustees in the cause,
to-wit: 100000, may be paid over to the
petitioner to make good in part the balance
due the estate of her testator, from the estate
of said Nathan; that the heirs at-law OF
said Nathan, at the time of the filing OF
the Bill, were said c. Hanson Raltt
brother; John T. Raitt, a nephew; Henry
C. Raitt, a nephew; Charles H. Raitt, a
nephew; Laura c. Raitt, neIce; Elizabeth
Z. Eye, a neice; Richard W. Simpson,
nephew: Thomas W. Simpson, q nephew;
Edward B. Simpson, a nephew; George K.
Simpson, a nephew; Sophia s. Crapster
wife of said G. W. Crapster, and Lurenno A.
Aiken, a neicc; hat since said bill was
filed said C. Hanson Raitt has died as afore-
said. also said John L. Raitt and Sophia ).
Crapster; that said John 7. left an adult
daughter, Ella, married to Rev. -
Sherwood; that said Charles II. Raitt,
Laura C. Raitt, Elizabeth L. Eye, George X.
Simpson, Lurenno A. Aiken and Ella Sher-
wood are onresidents, living beyond the
State of Maryland. That Henry c. Raitt is
living in Baltimore City; Richard W. SimP-
son and Thomas w. Simpson, in Frederick
county, and Edward B. Simpson and Gusta-
vus W. Crapster are living in Carroll county,
Maryland.
1t is thereupon adiudged and ordered by
the Circuit Court of Carroll county, in Equity,
this 10th day of May, in the year eighteen
hundred and ninety-two, that the petitioner,
by causinga copy of this order to be inserted
in some newspaper published in Carroll
county, Maryland, once in each of four sue
cessive weeks before the 10th day of June,
next, give notice to the said Charles ii.
Raitt, Laura c. Raitt, Elizabeth E. Eye,
George r. Simpson, Lurenno A. Aiken and
Ella Sherwood who are non residents of the
State of Maryland, absent defendants, of the
object and substance of said petition, and
warn them to appear in this Court in person,
or by Solicitor, on or before the 9th day of
July 1892, to answer said petition and show
cause, if any they have, why decree ought
not 10 pass as prayed.
CHARLES B. ROBERTS,
Trne Copy,-Test:
my2l-5t Benz. f. GROUSE, Clerk.