The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1892-06-03
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.
No. SO Equity. In the Circuit Court for Gar
rett county. William II. Role, Plaintiff, VS..

No $50 Equity. In the Circuit Court for Gar
rett county. William II. Rolfe. Plaintiff, VS..
Annie f. Role, Defendant.
The object OF this suit liz TO procure decree
Of said Court, div0rcing the plaintiff from the
DEFENDANT a rfncui0 D,dtrimOah.
The bill states: LIST. That the said VIM, ii,
Role, the plaintif, was married to the defen-
dant. then Annie f. Hughes, on the 9th day
oi November. In the year lss5, In Garrett
county, Maryland, ever since which time the
plaintiff has resided in said county and state;
and the defendent during the greater portion
of said time.
2nd. That said parties lived and co-habited
together as man and wife In said county,
during the said time, with the exception OF
two Intervals. OF two and seven rOnths re-
spectively. during which said intervals, the
defendant abandoned and lett the plaintiff
and refused TO reside with him; and that
about the middle of October last, the defend
ant finally left the abandoned plaintiff, and
Is living apart from him; and the plaintiff Il
informed and believes that she IN now roam
lag about from place to place without any
home or fixed place Of abode; and the plain
tin does not know at what particular point or
place she may now be, he not having seen
her nor rccei we'd any exact information con-
cerning her since the 18th OF last October; but
he believes that she Is still somewhere in
Garrett county aforesaid.
Sd. That some time after the plaintiffs said
marriage with the dciendent, he discovered
| that the defendant had been guilty OF adultery
| with another person or persons; aud that he
had no knowledge of this fact until n long
| time after his said marriage with the de
! PENDANT.
9TH. That subsequently to her said marriage
TO the piainiiff the defendant has been guilty
| of the offence of adultery, and the plaintiff
/ believes her to be utterly lewd and unchaste
| 5th. The bill alleges that the abandonment
OF the plaintiff by the defendant Is deliberate
and final, and without any reasonable expec-
| tatiOl of reconciliation.
9Th. That there was one child born since
| the said marriage: of tender years and now
| in the custody of the plaintih.
| 1th. The bill then prays for IL divorce q pin-
ctti0 mafr6nOnH and for general relief.
J Two successive subpoenas having issued
| for the defendant In this case and been sue
! cessivtly returned honest by the sheriff oil
| said county, IL Ii thereupon adjudged and
! ordered by the Circuit Court Tor Garrett
/ county sitting as a Court of Equity, this 5tll
! day OF May, 1892. that the complainant, by
! causing copy of this order to be inserted III
| some newspaper published at Oakland In
/ Garrett county aforesaid, once a week fol
! four successive weeks, at least fifteen days
/ before the 9Th day OF June, 1902. give notice
| OF the object and substance of this bill and
! warn her to appear in this Court, In person OF
| by solicitor. ON or before the said 9Th day o
| June. 1892 to answer the premises and show
! cause. ifany she has. why n decree ought moi
! to pass as prayed.
j.. Il. TOWER,
True copy-test Clerk.
r.. n. TOWER, Clerk. ll-4t