The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1892-11-17

the relatrix had improper relations with
men other than the defendant about tho
time Of the alleged conception should be
considered as introduced as tending TO lm-
peach the prosecuting witness, and Tor no
other purpose. Is held error. Fox, j.. con-
siders as lt appears Q correct result WAS
reached the Judgment should be affirmed.
51l. State ex rel John w. Pyles VS.. Sam
mel McCray ct al Mama c. C. Affirmed.
Reinhard. Q. J.-Under the system esteb-
llshed by the act of 1877. supplemented by
Sections 1867, suit may be instituted on the
contractors bond by laborers and others
affected by the work, while under the
special provisions of the act of 1885 the su-
perintendent alone may sue.
1913. John Z. Courtney va. State. Mont
gomery G. c. Affirmed. Black. il While
the use OF q stenographer by the prose-
cutting attorney. before the grand jury for
the purpose of taking down evidence 10
not provided for by statute. such departure
from the mode indicated by Section 1885,
r. s. 1881, will not abate q particular in
dictment without some showing that the
accused was injuriousiy affected OF that
something unauthorized was said OF done
which probably injured him. 2. A regu-
larly elected judge of q circuit court who
has granted an application for Q change OF
that n sna'e .Ds before foT ihe
trial of such cause has called
In another Judge, or has appointed On at
torney as special Judge, can open and hold
session of that court and judicially dis
while such trial before the substituted or
special Judge is IN progress 3. The right
to q special finding with conclusions OF
law is not extended to criminal &C tions. 4.
Evidence that appellant. indicted as CON-
mon gam bier. visited other places than
that alleged was admissible to show he
did so for the purpose of gambling.
65l. Emily Moune, Administrative, vs.
Clinton Storer ct al Vanderburg =. 9.
Oh Dosw I'd
dissents.
SUPERIOR COURT.
Room Hon. Napoleon B. Taylor judge
j. NJ Hightshoe q Co. VS.. Hortense F.
Webster ct al; mechanics lien. Finding
for plaintiff for S513,50,
Eliza Woods VS.. Henry G. Earl ct al;
foreclosure. Cross-eomplaint of Jane Mar
shall Dismissed. Costs against Jane
Marshall.
Room Sion. Pliny W. Bartholomew. Judge.
Z. b. Cummings VS.. Royal Publishing
Company; damages. On trial by jury:
Alfred r. Mullins ct al. va. VIM. Hildi
note. judgments for e2o9.7a.
Nep S,sts Flied.
George b. Marsh VS.. Ida l.. Marsh; petit
tion for writ of habess corpus. Room 3.
Edmund Dietz VS.. Sarah Solomon OF ali
suit on notes. Room 2.
Maria G. Montana VS.. Charles Pauline ct
al; suit on account and affidavit in attach
George W. MoCray VS.. Cyrus H. Ross ct
al; suit on note.
Simon Smith vs. Emma Smith; divorce.
Room 3.
o. b. Tennis ct al. VS.. Lula Brigham; suit
on account. Room /.
CIRCUIT COURT.
Hon. Edgar A. Brown. Judge.
Mary Jane Watson VS.. Sarah NJ. Watson,
for annulment of marriage. On trial by
court.
Nep Suits Filed.
Jacob Frankel VS.. Louisa Reinhart; suit
on note and 70 f0rcl0se chattel mortgage.
Louisa A. Morand VS. Citizens Street
railroad Company; damages. Demand,
$4,000.
William w. Herod and William P. Herod
vs. Samantha G. Frederlcks; suit on note.
CRIMINAL COURT. ~
Hon. Mnlard Y. Cox. Judge
State vs. Charles Nicewander and Joseph
Burns; robbery. Trial by jury; finding of
not guilty as to Burns and guilty as to
Nicewander. Fined 81, 600 and sentenced to
ten years in the State prison and disfran-
chised for ten years.
State VS.. Clara May Horton; incorrigibil-
ity. Sent to Reform School for Girls.
State vs.. William Cook, William Shafer
and Frank Faucet; grand larceny. De-
PENDANTS Faucet aud Cook found not guilty.
Defendant Shafer found guilty and sent to
ho Ra< Cob 81 co.