Mexico weekly ledger., 1892-01-14
CIRCUIT COURT DOCKET.
TERM, 1899.

FIRST pAY-MoNpAY, JAN. 25.
/ W. II. White VS.. Jos. II. Botkin.
2 City of Mexico vs.. Shap Geiger
OF al.
8 City of Mexico VS.. Montgomery
4 Harriet La Turno vs.. Godfrey
Goodall ct al.
5 John Kelley vs.. Ida Kelley.
g j. w, Jefirles vs.. Lille Jeffries.
7 Callie &. Orr vs.. Chas. Ii. Orr.
s Efie Wright, ct al. VS.. M. IL.
Banks ct al.
8 Evaline Caldwell vs.. VIM. Cald-
well.
10 Mrs. Il. Yohn VS.. John YOhn.
SECOND DAY-TUEsDAY, JAN. 20.
IL j. G. Head vs.. Mexico Fire Brick
Company.
IL. A. J. Clements, adj, etc. VS.. NJ. Y.
Duncan.
1s c. Fl. Bruce vs. B. F. Dobyns ct al.
IA School dist. 3, so, IL vs.. School
dist. 8, 50, 10.
Is J. A. Campbell VS.. Rachel Camp
bell.
10 Lakenan & Barnes VS.. j. A.Smith.
II. Henry Hozelton, ct al. VS.. ID.
Pashang ct al.
THIRD DAY-wEDNEsDAY, JAN. p.
II Mercantile Bank VS.. Il. J. G. Smith
Bow-r.
10 G. c. Orr, appellee, vs.. De Witt
and John Shoots.
20 G.. G. R~agsdale, appellant, vs..
Frank Gahan, ct al.
q Sam Morris, appellant, VS.. David
Weeder.
% Ricketts, 81 Glenn VS.. a. H. Heath.
% B. F. Mays VS.. Dora Mays.
"a ]. W, Eubanks, appellee, VS.. H.
Eubanks ct al.
FOURTH DAY-THURsDAY, JAN. Is.
25 Mary Ketcher VS.. Wabash Rail
road Co. ct al.
&c John Il. Harris VS.. Wabash Rail-
road Co.
q Henry B. Stowe ct al. vs.. NJ. II
Banks ct al.
IS NJ. H. Banks ct al. vs.. w. Banks
ct al.
20 Mcdonald, appellant, vs.. Gram
), Miles, appellant.
80 Plano Manufacturing Co. vs.. G.. B
Smith.
81 Shelton White VS.. Ella White.
80 B. Hellman & CO., Int. vs.. VIM
}, Pollock e. Co. VS.. G. A. Douglass
FIFTH DAY-FRIDAY, JAN. 90.
SO c. Wade VS.. B. Ringo.
81 Jesse b. Simpson ct al. VS.. Porter
]. Mitchell.
r So Ann I. Boren ct al. vs.. John Fish
:. er ct al. (sale term
SO G d. Ferris, appellant, VS.. Mrs
Belle Crews.
81 Turner, jackson & Co., appellee
: vs.. J. w. Daniel ct. al.
| 3S jeff Gatewood, appellant, vs.. Il
: l.. Berry.
80 Phil Rebman VS.. City of Mexic
ct al.
40 R. s. simpson vs. w. B. Beshear
l ct al.
: SIXTH DAY-sATURDAy, JAN. 80.
Al Laura Brenton VS.. Chas. Wake
field.
AZ w. H. Harris for Tudor Iro
e Works vs.. S. B. Cook.
43 John j. Cox, adm. est. Daniel Co
VS.. t. r. Shock.
A Jennie Karnes VS.. American In
o Company.
{ As Platt Thornbnrg Glass Co. vs. T
J. Maxey ct al.
46 j. G. Buckner, appellant, vs. /
# H. Cauthorn.
Al Mexico Savings Bank VS.. Ph
Helwig ct al.
q SEVENTH DAY-MoNDAY, FEB. l.
As Jno. Spotswood vs.. Joe Armstron
oil ct al.
= 40 State rel w. N. Barney VS.. J. v
o Middleton. .
so Walter A. Wood Machine Co. V
VIM. Ragland.
81 Edna Davis VS.. J. G. Davis.
So w. b. Payne VS.. Fannie l.. Payn
So Matte l.. Carter VS.. J. G. Carte
d 81 Nicholas Yoste VS.. Clara Yoste.
55 Bauer, Seasongood & Co. vs.. j. v
ii Schrader.
IS r. w. Ednlonston, application Fl
license to practice law.
81 Chas. Saunders VS.. MarySaunder
EIGHTH DAY-TUEsDAY, FEB. 2.
:. So Audrain Co. Mfg. and Mining c
Il VS.. w. K. Potts & Son.
;, 50 Sharp Bros. vs.. j. w. Sturgee
9, ct al. =
; so River Side Publishing Co. vs.. Re
y lin McNarna ct al.
le 81 D. l.. S. Bland We. E. F. and A.
a Taylor.
, 50 W. 4. Kemp ct al: VS.. B. Wa
l dington.
i IS E: d. Weber vs. Elmer Kerr.
!; NINTH DAY-WEDNESDAY. FEB. 8.
l. ga City of Mexico, appellant, V
e John Shoots, appellant.
q 65 City of Mexico, appellant, VS..
G. Kellogg, appellant.
2 66 John Bright VS.. John Curry, a
2 pellee.
: 67 Houston & Trimble VS.. NJ.
'e Gooch, appellant.
So T. NJ. Mills vs.. Bunton and Pat
: appeliees.
u SO Dorcas Wayman VS.. Lewis Philli