The record-union., 1892-05-09
SUPREME COURT MINUTES.
DEPARTMENT oNE.

/ b6FARlAENT ONE.
SACRAMENTO, Friday, May 6, 1892.
Court met at 10 A. NJ. Present, Paterson, j.,
| Pfestung; Harrison, J.; Garoutte, j.; Brown,
Clerk Washburn, Baliff
| Eo,JI9-People VS.. O'Brien-Ordered that
| Ihe motion TO admit appellant TO bail, sub
by denied
| 14,474-Guidery. Administrator, etc., VS..
Green--Argued by ii. V. Reardan for appel
mitted
14,761-Reading VS. Reading-Pursuant to
| stlpulatlon nled herein, ordered that cause be
| submitted on briefs already filed
4 14,ooo-Erlanger IA VS.. Danielson ct al,-Upon
hholl-appearance ~ of counsel, ordered that cause
! upon motion.
q IA ,9o9-Slight VS.. Patton ct al-Pursuant to
sstIpulalion s filed herein, ordered that appellant
nave nave thlrty days from and alter April 19,
Io92, IN which time to file and serve brief,
| respondent thirty days to reply thereto, cause
| thereupon 10 be submitted.
1 IA SlO-Moore VS.. 5 hofeld eft al-Upon
moton OF John Gale for respondent ordered
Una, tLa, appellant have thirty days in which time
70 70 NE ana serve brief, respondent thirty days
W reply thereto, appellant ten days TO an
| sWer, cause thereupon o Ue submitted.
IN, o94,CBean VS.. Proseus-Upon motion of
ii Jonl 1ale Tor respondent, ordered that APP
pSIiI9HI nave thirty days in which time to lille
reply Drlei, cause thereupon to be submitted.
SouTt ADJOURNED to Monday, May 8, 1892,
DEPARTMENT TWO
SACRAMENTo, May 6, 1892.
Nourt met at 10 A. N. Present, Mcfarland,
j., presiding; DeHaven, j.; Sharpstein, j.;
OuiP' deputy Clerk; Washburn, Bailih.
| -o,SOo-People VS.. Lane-On motion of
DePuty Attorney-General Layson, ordered
that the order of affirmation heretofore mace
anu anu entered IN this cause be ana the same Is
heFepy set aside; further ordered that cause lie
placed on July term calendar.
lS,o23-Estate of WeSterfield-On motion
Vi foId lor respondent, ordered cause stand
submitted on briefs on Tile and motion to dis
miss withdrawn
Ill4, ,639-Austin VS.. Gagan, ST., ct al.-Ar-
gueo by Nlion for appellant Ford for respond
ent, and submitted.
i4.60l.Peachy vs. Peachy-There being no
orlefs on file and no appearance OF attorneys,
ordereo judgment and order be affirmed.
IN BANK.
Lax ,5S2-Jackson VS.. Observation-Disclosures
and order are affirmed. The court Concur
ring opinion: Harrison, ]. 1 concur: Pater-
son, j.
4,377-Cowden VS.. The California Steam
snip snip company Judgment affirmed. Ga
~ We concur: Mcfarland. ]; Paterson. j.:
IA, 91O-Bury VS.. Young ct aI.-Pursuapt TO
mitted. S''"
IA, ,S71-Merced Bank VS.. Rosenthai ct al
SJ Sn IaoIlon or Brusie, ordered respondent
nave twenty days to Tile brief, appellant thirty
| lnitted. P0 '''"
=, 4,638--Mahoney vs. Rostwick-Argued by
turner OF counsel and submitted
IA, ,I92-Brusie VS.. Gates ct af.-On motion of
| w. ii. Hatton, ordered Emory Gates be al
| lowed 10 file brief herein, further ordered ap-
pellant nave twenty days 10 file brief re-
! spondent twenty days TO reply, appellant fif-
Teen days TO reply thereto, cause to be there
upon submitted.
Admission of \. Marsh McConoughey-On
motion OF II. V. RearSian and presentation of
Incense 10 practice from Supreme Court of
illinois and evidence of good moral character,
ordered that the said a. Marsh McConoughey
be and he is hereby admitted to practice as an
attorney and counselor in all the courts of
this State. =
1892. -