New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1892-11-06

| carelcssly, and her sentence, rs IT STANDS, con
| veys totally wrong impression OF the fac's
! 1t is in that respect typical oil many o'"ai
| sentences in both articles.
| No more can Lady Jeune be aware OF the 70
| feciion she makes suggests on the Queens SIN
| cerity and good fifth. She will be as'onlsIed 10
hear she has made But she saws In two con-
s,cutve sentences that:
THE sentiment OF loyalty and affection 10 the
| Queen is in great measure due TO her secluslon
| from the hustle and strife OF public life
And then
1t may ~ that the policy which size has pur-
sued for many years may be dictated by sa-
gacious and profound Knowledge Of her people,
who, in her isolation, with Its ratheuc oigni,y'
see only sovereign whose life presents an idyllic
picture of home and simple pursuits, who' sur
rounded with all tie grandeur and power OF &
great empire, chooses TO work steadily for her
peoples welfare never relaxing her thoushtful
labor in their behalf"
Now, if those sentences taken together mean
ANYTHING. they mein that the Queens s>c!usion
from public life il due, no; - her grief ana WIDOW
hoo !, bat 10 cool calculation Of the effect upon
pubic opinion of o hypoeriical appearance OF
grief, and to a deliberate purpose 70 exploit her
widowhood. Again, | SAY, II is MOI u DO sup
posed that Lady Jeinc had such a thing in nina,
or WAS aware Of the iuferepce that would be
drawn and must b. drawn. from her words B"t
IL It H. Necessary TO make that excuse in ~ grave
a matter a. this. what assurance has the reader
that the other charges Wlci make up TUE SUI
stance Of the censure uDon London Society are
more carefully considered OIL expressed with any
create: precision?
1t wa, a fine tribute which speaker offered
last week 70 Lacy Jeune whrn he described her as
BIS owing her charities on the East End. and her
criticisms on the West End, Of London. IL her
criticisms were as sound as Ter charities are III
dicious and generous, thes' and other comnlchto
on her srtic'es might have oeen left unwTlt'en
But il still has - be saiG that those who know Her
subject question botli her facts and her copc!n-
siors, and that her spirited pages abound i'll in
accuracies which II little pltie'c" would haYa
wcedcd out II does NOT add 20 tie force OF tte
complaint that social trunphs due 10 the Gordon
bcu If you mistake the gender OF the Gordon bIen
Ii doe, no, point The contrast drawn between
fa hi uable London and fashionable Pafi4 IL y0n
imagiue the FauoouIs 81. GERMAN 10 lie Outside
the region OF fasliro. Lady Jenne would rot
care much for the stlictur,s VI F.enchman WHO
should speak of the scornfnl isolation OF ir!'
gravia from fashionable London Nor wonid
New-Yorker think II showed an intimate ac1Ualnt-
ance with the social life Of his Own cite to cescr"c
the Finh-ave. "a entirely separated ro'u fashion
Another poirt may re pnt ~ II; f'minlne c"h'o'
of Tie North AmcTican !iei hroadsides are
aimed. by her own admiss on, dt lie smarfes' ''
of Lordon Society,", But 49, II. whether to her own
knoNl5d DE OF by common report ,he smar'es' Sc.
where the majority Of sinners arr 'o De lp"'d
Lady Jeunr'a acquaintance eAbnd' fGr eNoh"
this particuIar circle. Fcw la!cS iG London II
ary know = g.elter number or il;ere-t;ne p'0p''
in q greater number Of din, rea' scis when sho
chCo.e. 10 cast IL net i has wide sweep Ier
slutc.s OF knowcd4c are eAtre~cN 'n7ie!' IA"
knows. il must b. preoumed, something oil VIM
e es on in other worlds than The one when - '''
spec'ol Object of her satire. | will initiate the
Giscr tion am sure she ne NJ 10 observe. end VIII
utter no word which can ir Supposed to Indlc"'e
any individual But | t!lnl Lads Jrnnr NAV
fairly b, asked - say who her ia" section ~
which sh, deyol,s lhr cri ,n' j. the ONLY orc
that III GIT be criticized Is y