The Oskaloosa herald., 1892-10-06
GEoRGE VS.. SOPHIE BANKS.


SEPTEMBER TERM OF COURT-THE
Why's AND wHRREFoRRs.
GEORGE VS.. SOPHIE BANKS.
Their marriage took place in Novem-
Der, 1891, since which time Mr.. Banks
AYERS that he has been loving and du.
tiful husband in all ways and at all
times. He claims that the wife has dis
regarded the marriage vows and has
been guilty Of adultery. He therefore
asks for a divorce and such other relief
as the court may deem just and proper.
o. JENNIE vs.. G. D. ALEXANDER.
They were married at OSkalOosa, In
June, 1881. The wife claims at all times
to have cOnd uctsd herself in faithful
and loving manner and to have done all
In her power to forward the welfare of
the home. There have been born as
the fruit of this marriage two sons and
one daughter. The husband it is claimed
is addicted to drunkenness and will not
furnish any support for the wife and
children. She asks for relief in di-
vorce from G. D. Alexander ard also
asks for the care and custody Of their
three children, and further asks for ali
mony.
WILRY vs.. JULIA PARKER.
This couple were married at Mucha-
KNOCK on or about Dec. /, 1885. The
plaintiff declares that he has been a
faithful and considerate husband since
that time. He asks for q divorce on the
grounds that his wife has associated
with men Of bad character and has been
guilty OF adultery. One child has been
born to them and he asks for the GUS
tody and care Of this child.
| SARAH VS.. CHAs. BUCKNBR.
Their marriage was in Fairasld in
June, 1883, and the wife asserts that
from that time and upon all Occ asions
she has been dutiful and loving. That
the husband has been guilty Of the most
cruel and inhuman treatment to the
danger of her life. That he has neg
lected her and has not provided means
for her support when he was abundant
ly able. That he has abandoned and
deserted her. Three children, two sons
and daughter, are the issue Of this
marriage. The wife asks for the care
and custody of the daughter. Bessie, and
the younger son, Wilbur, the elder son
to be cared for by the father. The
plaintiff also asks for portion Of the
defendants property as alimony where
by she may be SOle to support herself
and children.
GEORGE T. VS.. MABRL:BAKER.
These people were married on or
about Sept. 20, 1891. and the plaintiff
states that he has conducted himself as
q kind and considerate husband at all
times and under all circumstances. He
petitions TOR separation from the wife
on the ground that she has been guilty
Of adultery.
JOHN VS. LIZZIE BRODDUS.
Their marriage occurred on or about
May 3d. 1883. at Muchakinoek. Plain
till has always been kind and cOnsid-
crate husband. He claims that the de-
fendant has been guilty of assOciating
and being intimate with other men and
has been guilty Of adultery at divers
times and places. He claims that the
defendant has gone away and left upon
him the care of four year old boy. BE
therefore asks for divorce.
ELIZABETH N. vs. JOE Z. KIRKMAN.
They we're married in Abba, July 20.
1892 and the wife claims to have been
at all times obedient and dutiful. The
defendant is charged with adultery and
cruel and. inhuman treatment to the
danger of the plaintiffs life. Plaintiff
asks for a divorce and alimony.
MARYC. VS. OTIS MILLEDGE.
Their marriage took place in Febru
ary, 1872, in Richland township. The
plaintiff asserts that she has been al
that faithful and loving wife could
be. The plaintiff petitions for the di'
VcTce because she has been cruelty anG
inhumanly treated by the defendant -
so much so that her life has been jeOp
ardiZed. The defendant Is given tC
drink and is abusive in his language tC
the plaintiff. It is claimed that the de
fend ant also is guilty Of neglect and re-
fuses to allow plaintiff to have means
of support Defendant is abundant!
able to furnish this and in addition Il
divorce alimony Of $500 is asked.
!. N
They were married in Oskaloosa OF
March q, 1891, and the wife AYERS tina
she has performed her duties in a faith
full and loving manner. The husband
so it Is stated, has cruelty and inhun
anly treated the wife and has driver
her away from home with the bah
that has been born to them. She ask
for a divorce, alimony and the care an,
, custody of their one child.
WI. VS. REBEOCA MOFFET.
Their marriage was celebrated il
! Sioux City about April l, 1889. Th
plaintiff declares that he has conducte
{ himself as q faithful, kind and cOnsid
crate huaband. The defendant ha
wilfully deserted the plaintiff and ha
associated with other men and has bee
guilty of adultery and that her presen
+ residence ls unknown to the plaintiff
. a divorce is asked on these grounds.
t GRoRGR VS. LAURA THOMAS.
r April IL, 1884 Is the date Of thei
; marriage. The husband was ever kline
: faithful and true to all the marriag
vows. They lived together two year
when the plaintiff was deserted by th
defendant. About two years ago th
. defendant was delivered of an illegiti
mate child aud on these grounds th
divorce Is asked.
ETA VS. b. NICHOLS.
They were welded in 1889 and tb
wife AYERS that at all times she hs
been loving and true. She sues for
divorce on the ground that the husban
r has been guilty of adultery and hs
o been convicted of felony and is at tn
r present time confined at hard labor /
Q the penitenCiary at Ft. Madison. Sh
s also asks for the care and custody {
9 their one child.
. FANNIE VS. JOSEPH BOYD.
q They celebrated their marriage &
{ Oskaloosa on Nov. "a, 1887. DefendaI
Is given to drunken habits and shortl
: after the marriage deserted the plain
til and has never rendered any q
sistance or support. On this accouT
the plaintiff asks for divorce.
ANNA VS.. JOHN II. BARRACKMAN.
Their marriage was solemniEsd on {
about August second, 1853. The plail
i'll says that she has ever been q trU
- LIZ. =.