The Stark County Democrat. [volume] (Canton, Ohio) 1833-1912, 1892-11-03

the Numef Gus Gases OF Wage Reduo'
tions--. Facts, You Know, are 8 Stubborn
Th,nes---All Baboring Men should
Read
The Republican stumpers and the Re
publican press are Consistently referring 10
| Labor Commissioner Peck's port ofNew
York, In order to prove that wages have
inc -sased since the passage OF the McKin-
ley bill.
What are the facts OF p. ck's report ?
| Peck says in his report tnat thet Q has Ie n
an mere Sc in wages, but he does not
name single Industry In his state that
has raiB, d wages. For the past three
| months he has been asked time and again
to name the single industry in New York
| State that has raised wages. Having had
| three months to substantiateed his doctor
| report, he b ~ yet fai ed to do SO, and in
stead OF naming one industry in New
York that has raised wages he destroyed
| the original papers that belonged to the
| State, thiukiDR that by so doing he could
be able to shield his false report.
What are the facts as to wages in New
| York State?
On Oct 2s, 1890, the silk ribbon weavers
at Levy's sLop NV York City had their
| wages reduced 10 per cent.
| On Nov. 10, $780, the embroiderers at the
| factory of HIitenstein q Co, Union Hill,
Nav York City, had their wages reduce d
On Nov "a, 1890. J. II isenbaum, 11S
| Avenue p, New York City, reduced the
W i ot his vest makers
| q Nov. 2 1890, B ur y Neuhsm sr
| su- ~ u3tT manufacturers NV York City,
! reduced the pDgrs ot 12O Of Iheir en-
| pos.s.
Ua Dec. ls, 1890, the cigar m 4kers Of
| Harry Hart, 2 Warren street, NV York
| CITY, h ID their wages reduced.
-, o. Dec. %, 1890, ihe wages o, Hufsr d
| ~ nj. n
we're rulucrG 10 per cent.
| q Dee. 20 1890. IT," plush makers OF A.
| W.isspsr., N. city, hsd their wages re-
| Cuc.a.
On Jun 3. 1891. III" cigar m kers at
| + ull Neu's U. ,. ,Iynr 'ar'rr.. n. Y. city,
| went out on a ,tiike Oh aCc"uaJ of a re.
| due iiou in vsEas,
On Jan. 16, 1891, The eu ployr Schrar.
| berg dregsmAkS cstR hlishmeni, N. Y.
| city, went out on strike on account of d
| reduction in wages.
On Jan. 10, 1891, the pssssmentrie work
| ers Of II. l.. Opper, N. Y. city, went on a
strike on account of a reduction in wages,
On Jan. 81, 1891, the wages Of the cigar
makers of II. Jacobs shop, N. Y. city, had
their wages reduced.
On Feb. 3. 1891, the slipper manufacs
turers Of n Y city agreed upon a general
| lockout, and their men were discharged.
On Feb 6, 1891, the employees Of the
| cordage factory Of John /. Bailey & CO.,
Olsego, N. Y, went on strike against a
reduction in wages.
Ou Feb. 26, 1891, the furriers OF A. Her.
zig Sons q Co., N. Y. city, went on strike
against u reduction in wages.
On March 2, 1891, the lastprs at Ryan's
shoe factory, Brooklyn, N, Y, went on q
strike against a reduction in wages.
On March 6, 1891, the girls employed in
Bellor's cigarette factory, n. Y. city, went
on strike because theic wages were re>
duced Sl.20 per thousand.
On March Z, 1891. the cigar makers em-
ployed in ID. Marks factory, N. Y. city,
went on strike because their wages were
reduced.
On March 1881, the j1urpeymen tailors
at Bryant & Ondracks shop New York
city, went ON a strike on account OF a re-
duction in w6Res.
On March 10, 1891, the cigar makers of
Rosenthal & Co New York city, went on
a strike against a reduction in wages.
On March IL, 1891, the cigar makers at
the Mongolia Cigar factory, New York
city, had their waves reduced.
On March IL, 1891, the cigar makers at
Litchenstein d Sons factory, New York
city went on a strike against reduction
in wages
On March 12, 1891, MarKinnen Knitting
mills Sheard's Knitting mills and the
Sazony mills reduced the wageG of their
employees S2 30 per week.
New York city went on a strike on account
OF = reduction in wages.
Oa April "a, 1891, the sheet iron workers
At the Jordan q Moot Iron works, New
York city, went on strike against re-
duction ia wages.
On May u, 1891, the silk ribbon weavers
at S. Wells shop, New York city, struck
against a reduction in wages.
On Jupe 80, 1891, the boys employ ed at
L1rillard's Tobacco factory, New York
city, refused TO submit to a reduction in
wages and went on Il strike.
On July 3. 1891, the cigar makers of /.
p ark, Now York city, had their wages re-
dnced 81 per LOCO.
On July 8, 1891. 500 cigar makers in the
employment of Silberthan & Co., RosenS
thal d CO., LondaneT q Kaiseu, Hork &
Co, gud A. Scnwarkoff, went on a strike
against d reduction in wages of 81 90 per
600
On July 8, 1891, jacob Bros. tsilors of |
New York City, went on n strike against q |
reduction in wages, claiming that the re- |
duction would compel them to work Is |
hours a day 10 earn Sc 90 week.
On July %, 1892, Clement Dehler of |
Williamsburg. N. Y, reduced the wages |
of his trainers cents per hour.
On July %, 1891, Wieseithier establish
ment in New York city, reduced the wages |
OF their pApts makers.
On July q, 1891, the tailors in Herzbaum
d Mascorvitz establishment in New York |
city, went on strike against reduction
in wages,
% July 80, 1891, Stark Co., N. Y. city,
reduced the wages of their workmen.
On August a. 1891, one hundred cloak
makers employed by Julius Stein d Co.
and Friedman Bros, of N. Y. city, went
on strike on account of a reduction in
wages.
Ga August II, 1891, the sheet iron work
srs OF New York cigy went on a strike on
account of 25 per cent. reduction in wages
On Sept 30, 1891. the foremen at Jonar-
son d. Co, New York city, had their wages
reduced 50 per week.
On Oci. rs, 1891, the silk weavers at
New York city, went on q
strike on account of u reduction in wages
On March z, 1891, the cigarette makers
at Monelis q Cn's. establishment went on
3 stfike on account of a reduction in
wages.
On Nov. 10, 1891, the Smith carpet
factory at Yonksrs, New York shut down
.browing 1000 employees out of employ
meut.
on Dec. A, 1891, wSges of wcavers at
New York mills, Cotton Co.. Utica, New
York, were reduced from S6 16 To $500 per
week.
On Dsc. %, 1891, the garment workers et
5rssabura a. Marshall shops went on a
strike sgainst u reduction in wages.
On Dec. 81, 1891, 250 coopers at SYRIA
'use, n. Y, had their wages reduced 10
per cent.
On Feb. G, 1892, the employees OF Siemon
Z Cox embroidery factory New York City,
vent on strike against a reduction In
wages.
On February Is, 1892, the Iron mould
srs of Geneva, N. Y, all went out on q
strike against a reduction of wages.