New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1892-05-13
HE SAYS SHE RUINED HIM.

pruyT1Fr's DOLFFUL TALE OF THE ALLEGED
wILEs OF WOMAN.
doeful tale of ruin ut tho hands OF M alleged ad
ven+,r.ss WAS tod IN an affidavit which presented
10 Judge McAd; the superior Court yesterday oy
Philip II. Irving. The affidavit was made by lrVlhs'
~ tho defendant in suit which Charlotte "erl Drought
AGAINST him for $4,000 for alleged defamation OF
character lie secured the services q David NJ Neu
bcrrer and went before Judge GiliersleeVe. In the
superior Court. The lawyer tod the story oi his
client and without fidavts Judge GAdersiecVe Proeu
The prisoner In the custody Of his COUNSEL and granted
III order 10 show why Irving should not DC us
cborecJ. or Ids bail reduced. Yesterday Judge Nc
Adam reduced the bail the nominal sum OF 7ioo anu
that was furnished by Irving. The defendant Is snd
10 he a theatrical manager. The main points Of the
alidavit are rs follows:
Tho action l. brought against me to recover the sim
OF $1,000 damages ior argel uei''u' 49,, h U ,e
character of tho p1inii III haFhg si,eu .n bor
untrue 80 her marriage VOWS ana naNs Tihv d nv.
discputnblc wonan The sinemcIns ~ 'e 1y fnda
and complaint i'll this acton are whnU' ,'i ey" ,Ie
lion, untrue. am not aoo u t, cc o nar
state Of me. me, tine pI reif to lie
married wonan wu'sc husut'id ha' aeSer''u Iier "
left her pennies and been AWAY ot ,n " Sm and
presumed him 10 be dcad. she prevailed upon III!
symracs, ard by her nachrniions ;. a MIC NE from
that Dine MP % the present time to Will ime na,,
Of This sU have o.en TCT dc IN ruin rmHlns me-
Every dollar Of money which have h"d sle ma, " ~
cerdtd I'm actually taking from me rN0i' w "
property that possessed OF this Noin mas; I n
has Appropriated my iewclry and nppr"pra'ed 70 cr
IN, u use every article Of vauc, money ana properly
which possessed The action Is brought against me
in The hope anil for the purpose. II posNDie %
tlat She hcicvcs that i have money. oi nccV"e nv
and reducing PERJURY Sn1 want She Is wV hnsn
without any character. cniiIe! unInclpcu anu WHEY
Oaly desire and aim In life. from my cApcrieoc @
her has been 70 get money, irrespective Oh 'hc mean"
she employs for flat purpose ~ ?, vs, rxrontv.
reR nave aye @'s sSere Tor three years Plaintiff
Tows ~ have no Intention OF leaving tie city OF New
Y,Tk md will rot leave the city. and am c"lpcN
10 rcns. In the city. by reason q the Fact tnat INC
plantiN has ruined me. have nowhere TO 90. ana IN
stc,, Of my being indebted IN the plaintiff IN any 5'
whn,cver She has robbed of everything winch
p,sscssed 80 later than a week ago she came ~ m
publicly in store, and TOOK the aNi SO winch M'1
In the world l rerlly believe and charge tls lnct
i, be that this woman has laid her plans, hehevot
that | had great dCa! of money, TO chlral me WIZ
.Mnc nun whom She claimed to lie her husband, ana
who NAV be for al ! know She wrote me c,, " IeT
ter about week ago. desiring TO see me. Mhe, ia
called on her in answer to The letter sue rios 49, my
dior and then stated that her husband was Inside
was then compelled ia call officer In order to Eet
ont Of tic housc and believe that ms was pan
devised by her for the purpose OF bringing th acto
Immediately thereafter this action was brought