The Wilmington daily Republican. (Wilmington, Del.) 1890-1902, 1892-10-11
FALLACIEs REFUTED.
4 RIDICULOUS ARGUMENT PROMPT
LY PuNcTURED.

The Wages OF Europe Are Lower Abb
solutely and Not Relatively Than in
the United states-Some Striking State
ments which Arc Unanswerable.
The Tribune published letter written
to the New York World by Mr.. ].
Schoenhof, which it strongly Endorsed,
containing certain arguments in favor
of free trade. 1t was intended that the
following editorial should be printed in
the same issps as the communication
whose theories 1t controverted, but the
two got disunited:
Mr.. Schoenhof's mann contention is
that the productivity of the American
workingman is far greater than that Of
his foreign competitor, and that this Is
why his wages are higher, but that he
is paid no more than Europeans for the
actual amount of work done.
Schoenhof says that he found in min
ing coal that the German miner is paid
but little more than one-half per ton
what the American is paid-79 cents
against 81. 40 to $1.63 in Illinois to 81. II
in Ohio per ton. Mining coal by the
ton is piecework, and a workman makes
wages in proportion to the amount of
work he does. AS the American gets
about twice as much per ton he makes
double the wages of lie German coal
miner. This simple fact places Schoen-
hofs arguments hors de combat, SO to
speak.
What is true of coal is true of oil work
paid for by the piece. Unless the head
Of the establishment is in great hurry
to fill orders it matters little to him that
one man does his work more rapidly
than another man. What he has to pay
for work is the thing which interests
him, and 1t is the sum he has to pay the
workman, and not the number of hours
or minutes the workman is employed,
which fixes the price the employer asks
for the goods made in his factory.
The wages of compositors in Chicago
are nearly double what they are in Eng
land, and the price per 1000 ems is also
about double. Surprising it to be true,
which it is not, that the American com.
positor working by the 900 ems is twice
as swift as the English one, what differ
ence would that make to the employer
when he has to pay twice as much for
filling column as the English employer
does2 1t would be for the interest of the
newspaper to employ the English COM
positors at shilling per 1000 ems,
which Is about their pay. The quantity
OF matter to be set up would be the
same in both cases, but the cost of COM
position would be reduced half. The
| E,nn1iAh 1N1intsra tp,t -
longer hours or more of them might
have to be employed, but neither of those
things would affect the totafcost of com
position. That would depend solely on
the rate per thousand.
1t follows then that where work is
paid for by the piece the employer is
concerned only about what he pays for
the work done, and not the length of
time it takes the workman to do it.
1t appears from the various reports on
labor i'll foreign countries that all piece.
work is paid for at far lower rates there
than here. Furthermore, the prices paid
for piecework regulate and govern to a
great extent those paid for work by the
day or hour. The price paid working
man for his days labor is based on M
estimate of what the average man
would do if he worked by the piece. 1t
is midway figure between what the
best and the poorer workman would
earn.
Hence it will be seen that the lowe,
wages Of Europe are lower absolutely
and not relatively. They are not lower
because the men work slower, but be.
cause they get less for each yurd of cloth
they spin, each ton of coal they mine
each pound of steel or square foot OF
glass they make, each 1000 ems of type
they set, and SO on to the end of the
chapter.
: 1t is claimed by the free traders thai
. the operatives in American cotton mill.
tend more looms and spindles than thost
a in foreign factories. Surprising it to b,
so, those operatives are but very
: small per cent. of the total number Of
workingmen and women in the United
States.
/ But to end this controversy with /
final and convincing argument, the fac
remains that nearly all the competitiv,
goods made in Europe, no matter wha
their 'cost OF production" may be, ar
offered for sale by those who make then
f at prices much below those asked 70
similar goods made in this country
Why? Not because the foreign manu-
facturers are satisfied with much lowe
profits; not because they get their raw
materials much more cheaply, or be
7 cause transportation costs them less, Blu
because they pay less per yard or poun,
to their labor for the products turne,
out. And that is just why they cal
I undersell American manufacturers /
4 the protective duties are taken off, an
ruin their business, close them up an,
drive them from the field, unless Amer
lean workmen will consent to reduc
their wages about to the pei cent. of tn
protection which Democratic free trad
ers would repeal. Chicago Tribune.