Iowa County democrat. [volume] (Mineral Point, Wis.) 1877-1938, 1892-04-15
THE SUPREME COURF.
Opinions Handed Down-Reports of the
Same in Brief.

Opinions Handed Down-Reports of the
Same in Brief
The following are the proceedings of the
supreme court yesterday, reported briefly:
Kobiter VS.. Albrecht Judgment re-
verSed and remanded with directions to
render Judgment for the plaintiff of fore
closure for the amount due ON the note
and mortgage In suit, by the terms thereof.
. On taxation 100 pages to be deducted from
case.
Csrcoll VS.. Fethers, Order reversed.
Youngs vs.. johnson. Judgment af-
frmed.
Heinneman VS.. LeClair. Order revers-
ed and remanded with directions to pro-
,, coed In the action in accordance with opln-
ion.
Bad River numbering Co. VS. Kaiser.
Judgment affirmed.
Armin vs.. Loomis. Judgment affirmed.
Genni vs.. Holm. Judgment reversed
and remanded for new trial
Johnson vs. Youngs. Judgment re-
versed and remanded with directions to
render Judgment in favor of the plant
1T for the sum Of $697.66, with interest
from the 18th of April, 1890.
MCNlChie VS.. town of knight Order
ati"n ed and remauded for further pro-
ceedings according to law
Nosburg VS.. State. Judgment reversed
and remanded with direction in accord
ance with opinion.
Schild VS.. LegIer. Judgment reversed
and remanded for new trial.
Canton Surgical and Dental Chair Co.
VS.. McLain. Judgment affirmed.
Van Guldertaeen VS.. Pr Rnix ms. Co.
Judgment affirmed.
Cox VS.. North Wisconsin Lumber Co.
Portion of judgment appealed from af-
frmed.
State ex REL, Attorney general vs. Gun.
ninghan, secretary of state. Demurrer
to complaint overruled, with leave to an
swer within 20 days
Newman VS.. Ogden. Judgment af-
frmed.
Sneaton VS., Austin: Judgment af-
frmed.
Joint school district No. II VS.. Reid.
Order affirmed.
Bishop VS.. McGillis. That part of the
order appealed from affirmed.
Bishop VS.. Lombard. That part of the
or der appealed from affirmed
Bishop vs.. King. That part of the order
appealed from affirmed.
Laliy Vs. Rossman. Judgment reversed
and remanded with directions to render
judgment for plaintiffs for 81, 1876 %, with
interest and costs.
Andrews VS.. Youmans. Judgment az
hrmed.
Duncan VS. Erickson Judgment as to
damages affirmed, and reversed as to costs,
and new taxation ordered.
Maurer VS.. Stiner. Order reversed and
remanded.
State ex rel Warden VS.. Knight. Judg-
ment affirmed
Nash vs.. ?. E. C. & N. Ry. Co. On
stipulation filed, appeal dismissed without
costs.
Same VS.. Same. Same.
Nash VS.. Scott Same.
Motions Granted.
The following motions have been grant
ed by the supreme court
Castenholz VS.. Heller. Motion for re-
hearing denied with S25 costs.
Saak VS.. Busley. Appeal dismissed for
failure to serve printed cases as required
by rule Kill
State ex rel. Attorney General w. Wau-
sau Boom Co. ct al. Leave granted attor-
ney general to commence suit
Cases Argued.
The following cases were argued before
the supreme court yesterday afternoon:
Waterman vs.. Chicago & Alton r. X.
Co., appellant. Argued by o. Fl. Fethers
and M. G. Jeffries for appellant, and VIM.
Ruger and |. G. Sloan for respondent.
Koch ct al, respondents, vs.. Williams
ct al, appellants. Argued by w. G.
Williams for appellants and by L. M.
Ogden for respondent.
Rumrill vs. the town Of Delafeld. Sub
mitted on case and brief.