Phillipsburg herald. [volume] (Phillipsburg, Kan.) 1882-1905, 1892-09-15

SS' Se--oAS0 al JuCdSeQ by the
judge The following is full report
of the proceedings:
State of Kansas Us. John Finley.
Defendant at large; case dismissed.
Same vs. NJ Y. Trosper; continued;
bond fixed at $1,000; defendant at
large.
The following cases were con
tlnued:
Cowgirl vs.. Scrlvner, Bortcher VS..
Wolcott, Lamfare VS.. Scrlvner, Cham
PIN vs.. Bickford, County VS.. Barnes,
Dickinson VS. HarkIns, Vaughn VS..
Miner, Fargher VS.. Champlin, Miner
VS., Stinson, Beedy VS.. First National
bank, Phillips & Bigelow Windmill
Co. VS.. Cook, Smith Bros. Loan and
Trust Co. VS.. Aldrich, Moulton Us.
Means. Mortgage Trust Co. VS.. Graf.
Bringham VS.. Bingham, Baum VS..
Baum, Kennedy VS.. Kennedy, Brig
ham VS.. Brigham, Ream VS.. Drury.
Adams VS.. Ernst, Mortgage Trust Co.
VS.. Colby.
The following cases were dis
mlsaedi
I Cooper VS.. Eckles, Smith Bros.
Loan and Trust Co. VS.. Brown, Cham
pin VS.. G. R. L & P. R'y, Kansas
City Investment Co. VS.. Creese, Iowa
Mortgage Co. VS.. Johns, Borel VS..
Borel, Atheam VS.. hmm, Dundee Go.
VS.. Hurd. Switzer VS., Switzer, Null
vane VS.. McKeon, Hill VS.. Letting
we'll, Blackman VS.. Lambert.
Judgment was rendered against
the plaintiff in the following case:
Bowman VS.. Eldridge.
Judgment was rendered for the
plaintiff in the following cases:
Ingersoll Commercial Co. VS.. Her
rick, for $27.50; Sanborn VS.. Kearns,
$13475; Sanborn VS.. Kit, $50; San
born Us. Willoughby, 1895; Dock
stader VS., Johns, Sa7aa3, Plerson VS.
Selfe, $7166i Lykins VS.. Fish; Ly
kins vs.. Burrus, $2016O; Pierson VS.
, Groesbeck, $16016; Beckley VS.. For
ney; Watkins VS.. Rariden, $21I.97
Dickinson VS.. Lund, 5000; Watkins
VS. Chestnut, $50; American Invest
ment CO. VS.. Seavey. $91.4O; LON
bard VS.. Basquin, $3.50; Whippl
VS.. Redman, $82954; Phoenex ms
Co. vs.. Foy, 81, 259O5; Phelps & Big
. Glow Windmill Cows. Turner, 1921, SO
: Warren VS.. Dawson; Reed VS.. John
son, $354.32; Smith Bros. Loan an
J Trust Go. VS.. Barnard, $G459l Smit
y & Coney Us. Belcher, $I,3O755 Coz
! ham VS.. Couch, $77O.23; Gorham v
g Pratt, $1,36197; Gay vs. Hostettle
$73715; Waverly Savings Bank Y
Q Mckee, $3,45065; Newland VS.. Her
II derson, $90475; Condo VS.. Horton
q $891.54; Northern Banking Co. V
Parker, $3,082.69 Lockwood VS.. Hill
$46575; Tucker VS.. Whitemarsl
y $99160; Jeffries VS. Pierson, 81, 4O5 81
v Jeffries VS. Houck, $676 Sc; Coffin
y Romjue. $677 80; Crowley VS. Fri
tag, $732 90; Staples VS. Campbell
e. S242 Sc; Jeffries VS. Mosher, $457 8
j, Lilly VS. Odds, $756 70; Morris VS. Va
r. Os, 81, GAL 30; Battershall VS. Whea
Of 1894 80; Mortgage Trust Co VS. Low
s $1.457 "a; Taylor VS. Gregory, 1886 3
l. American ms Co VS. Colby, $96 6
n. Jaeger VS. Fix, $615 81; Jaeger
er Wilson, $1.O48 %; Mortgage Tru
It. Co VS. Bracken, $I,242; Noble
t. Waite, $1,25O; Upham VS. Luca
e. 1854; Berry VS. Beeny, $498 66; Re-
n nier VS. Turner, S7O6 so; Manley
40 Barnes, 1884; Edgill VS. Chaplin, $38
Id Northern Banking Co VS. Woodwar
d. S257 30; Moore VS. Farrell, 50, 544 2
n. same VS. Proctor. $1,134; same
ut johnson, 81, 235 Al; MCKEE VS. Isbt
e. 1851. 80; Rogers VS. Crimes, $5l47
Spier VS. Kearns, 1915 81; New En-
land Mortgage Co VS. Chapin,$1, O75 4
Presbyterian church VS. Bowse
ID, 81, 235 80; Brown VS. Lewis, 81, 240 5
ID Washburn vs. Rogers. $1,517; Res
VS. Scott, s931; Spier VS. Conle
III 81, 1876; Henrlck VS. Sheriff., 81, O35 3
L. Mills VS. David, SLIT SO; Unic
10 Trust Co VS. Poor, $2,214; Downer
jill Mccullough, 1886; Adamson VS. Ben
u dict, $3.50 so; Mills VS. Isabel, S.
9O9.45; Mix vs. Turner, S2,945; Cs
nahan VS. Williams, 1888 50; Rice
OK Hubbard, 1914; Henry vs. Landau
MS 1,515 "a; Story vs. Couch, S2s
Stopper VS. Phillips county. ST.
I Jeffries VS. Dawson. $3.50; Frey
a Croft, 1882 20; Traders bank
&C. Moon, S2,O44 so; Briggs VS. Sche
ch n sOz 90. Nnrin vs Raroar 50 0f