Grand Rapids herald. [volume] (Grand Rapids, Mich.) 1892-1959, 1892-03-09
DRAWS TO A CLOSE


transacted for him. when . bill Ma
paid BEoun would check u Oh on nis
book IN : peculiar way. The indecent
pietare which Ma Hainss said he
shoWed her - Grandyills vas
otopty cigsrs>ss Piessre
--t,st Of "a actress. In pulling his
pqcketbook out ct bls pocket Il dreppe1
on The Goos. Nrs- Haines called his
attention 10 il. aad asked him what u
wa He ssid is WAS not very nice.
6no lnsiated on seeing it, and 10 showed
is - her. some tune after. 10 loo6.
Mr. Brown Febuksd him Tor showing
Margaret the picture, saying that sbe
had totd him tMr. Brown that he
lwitnseol had insulted her. He ex-
planned 70 the old man that be had
never iues,lted her. Never apoloGised
70 Mrs. HAines for slowing he's The pse-
ture- First night Alice WAS sick DR..
Hoyt VS. called.
Ee-diyees by Mr.. Uhl--Ths first night
Aiice was slck Dr.. Hoyt Was called,
but Dr.. Johnson Wa her regular ply
sician, and attended her Afterwards.
Was present whom Alice's trunk was
packed preparatory 10 her going west.
Her mothers clothing WAS put in
cheap trunk. Nrs. Browns trunk was
IN expeusive one. and the old man
would uos let her take il with her.
Witness charged the things 10 Alice ~
directed BY Mr.. Brown and Mira
Hafnos.
Ms. Hayden Iecalled-Had heard
thu testimony OF Nrs. Haines. Did not
cay ~ any time that could not talk
WITH my 2ather while that thing was IN
the room. Mrs. Haines' statement WAS
faIee that after her mot.ier's death and
previous 10 her coming to Grand Ran.
ids. her father was neglected. In 1856,
her father fell down cellar and injured
hiinsolf. Witness nursed him until he
recovered. Witness clothing Was not
more costly or moro expensive than
that possessed by Mrs. Haines. Wit
neoe remembered her trunk being
packed prior 70 going to Denver.
There was nothing in the trunk but
her mothers clothing. The statement
made By Mrs. Haines that the napkins
found in my trunk when 1t Was
searched was untrue. They never had
been washed. Witness bought them
herself. Sent Mrs. Haines for Christ
mar present tidy for chair and .
Japanese pin cushion.
Sic Did Net Accept the prssssn.
but returned them. Mrs. Haines did not
give them to her mother - testified
| 70 BY her ON the stand. The evidences
given BY Mrs. Haines 70 the effect that
Mr.. Brown caught witnesA aud Will
Brown in . compromising situatson
was untrue in every particular. Wit
ness had no quarrel with her father
wnen she left for Denver. Went 70 his
bedside, kisstd him goodbye and that
MAS Ill there Was to Il.
Cross-examination was begun BY DIR.
Russell asking the witness what day
and date abe left for Denver. Mr.. Uhl
AFFECTED on the ground that Il had all
been gone over 1T great length. Mr..
] Russell withdrew the question and then
produced letter and asked the wit
neos II Is Was in her handwriting.
She said she did not think it WAS ana
thep laid It was. Mr.. Russell said the
letter Was written in September 1880
and I've desired to introduce is in evil
dence. Mr.. Smiley asked Mr.. Russell
what HE object was and he stated that
shortly after the witness went to Dem
yer, she wrote the letter TO her sister.
That just before she went 70 Denver
! the witness testified that Mrs. Haines
isad told her that she was not the law
| full daughter of Mr.. Brown and that
Dr. HOyt of Adrian was her father.
The letter would Iebut the testimony
Of the witness to that effect. - ia It
| MYs, Hayden addressed Mrs. names "a
| her s.datling sister," which proved con-
| clusively that there Was no enmity be-
| tween tho sisters in 1880.
MI Uhl said there WAS no evidence
which showed that there Was enmity
! existing between them. That MfS;
Hayden MAS hurt BY what uar6aret
| had said, but il did not change her.
| Nj. Smiley ssid be thought the counsel
| for the prOponens had "a entirely dif-
| ferspt object. That the contestant had
| held ell along that in 1880 the sisters
wers on good terms and parted i that
| Mr.. Russell eaid be did not think
| that his brOthers on the other side
! should inspeach his intentions. He
| then cited ut length his reasons for
I wgntine the letter introduced, saying
( that il vent TO show that no such con-
( veroation ever occurred between Mrs.
Hnines and tho witness to the effect
| that she THE witness) vas IN ilieElti-
mate child. He WAS willing 70 strike
sscd nc.d ~" po''' w. "- = -
sss rsr 49,. ;a ar. al. ,..,.v -. -,
x us SSn' :. ~ w: suc 'ss's w. Ao'
~" p.sssS,, ~ -.rs"d - ~.~.,i NJ.
49,. ' :. sr,s.."s - -. nan 60
40 ~ :. s,.~s nm s,,isd - sh ~. !. - NJ
Scrc.ssrs Excsrs;cn. vsr" tsken
~ rsSS 49, ~ -. ;r.scs~rv =.
.,r,.s,ss =, ,' 1872 a. ~ IN" rroccrers
Ssch "a Sssn nrom;ssd fdr ia ~;