San Antonio daily light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1886-1907, 1892-10-05
37rH DISTRICT COURT.
Judpe Noonan Presidinp

Geo. Holmgreen & Sons against III. III
Alvord, debt; defendant was granted one
| day to answer,
Albert Lorsch e. Co against SamuelS &
| Rosenmann, sworn account; judgment by
| default.
Eugene Viscoya against f. X. Brown,
| prOmiSSOry note; judgment for plaintiff.
| Thompson Houston Electric company
| against West End Street Car company,
| on promissorry note; consolidated with
| No. 54S615, same style, transferred from
Forty fth district court.
Max Freund Il Co., against SamuelS Il
Rosenmann, prOmissory note; judgment
by default.
Johanna Stoves against Leslie b. Hand
and others, treSpaSS to try title; defen-
dant asked for jury.
Bernard minors against P. Nelson, debt;
defendant asked for jury.
National Bank of st. Louis against w.
L. Bryan. on promissory note; defendant
demanded jury.
Chas. r. Irvine and G. A. Raschbach
against C. X. Brenneman and Leopold
Michael, injunction; plaintiffs given leave
to lie amended petition.
A. B. Frank & Co. against johnson Il
Speed, attachment; defendant was given
one day to file answer.
NJ. Half Il Bro. against johnson &
Speed, attachment; defendant was given
one day to file answer.
B. M. Hammond and Lewis Ulrich
against August Nette, Jr., pebt and fore
closure of lien; judgment by default.
Union Manufacturing Co. against M. E.
Arlington, appeal from justice court; de-
PENDANT demanded jury.
Elmendorf & Co. against the German
American Day association, dismissed at
plaintiffs cost.
NJ. e. M. Building and Loan associa-
tion against Charles f. Hickes debt and
foreclosure Of lien; plaintiffs asked for
jury.
mann, two promisSory notes and damages;
judgment was given by default.
Louis Sein and other against the Inter
national & Great Northern R'y., dam
ages; plaintiffs ask for jury.
II. SCHNEIDER against ID. Sullivan &
Co., injunction and TOT cancel notes and
been of trust; plaintiff asked for jury,
L. A. Cullen against Cicero Cullen,
divorce; defendant asks for jury.
FL. III. Hunt against d. & A. Open
heimer, on contract; defendant asks for
jury.
International Building 81 Loan asso-
citation against Henry Miller and others.
debt and TO foreclose lien judgment by
default.
John J. Burke against John T. Bivens,
prOmiSsory note and to foreclose lien; de-
PENDANT asked for jury.
r. E. McLernon against John Ilg APP
peal from justice court; jury requested.
John E. LOOny against the San Antonio
& Arkansas Pass railway, damages; dis
missed by plaintiff.
Rosa Broggi against Pablo Broggi, di-
vorce; defendant given leave to file first
amended petition.
John G. Jones against the Galveston,
Harrisburg & San Antonio railway, dam
ages. iurV requested
HI. b. Chatlin & Co. against Leopold
Michael, garnishment; dismissed at
plaintiffs cost.
Jennie GAM against Simon GAM, di-
vorce; dismissed at plaintiffs cost.
Guy Borden against Ira M. Johnson,
debt and damages on contract; jury re-
QueSted.
Western Brass Manufacturing COM
pany against Dave Kirkwood, debt;
Judgment by default.
Paul Esser against William Hoehing.
Sr., appeal from justice court; judgment.
for defendant.
Sam Maverick VS.. Reagan Houston ct
al, Injunction, continued for plaintiff.
Mary A. Brown VS.. James E. Brown,
divorce, dismissed at plaintiffs cost
Pauline Baker VS. VIM. Booker, debt
to foreclOse lien, continued for service.
j. + Camp VS.. B. F. Yoakum and J.
E. Mcnamara, receivers, damages, on
tinued by counsel.
DeutSch ct al. VS.. Ben Moke, on settle
ment, continued by counsel.
Simpson & James VS.. |. A. Devices.
promiSSOry note, judgment by defendant.
Same parties VS.. &. H. IL 5. A. railway
Co., garnist ment, continued by counsel.
Emma GiddingS ct al. vs. Ii. b. Adams.
iet al, CT ,inued.
Lucy Mills VS.. Jim Mills, divorce, con-
tinued by counsel.
Z. d. l.. Wickes ct al. VS.. City of San
Antonio, to try title, continued.
E. Smith VS.. Branch Smith, divorce,
continued.
NJ p. Kelley VS.. B. f. Yoakum, debt,
continued.
H. Mills VS.. Sam Maverick, debt, con-
tinued.
Petor Sturm ct al. VS.. F. Hensel, parti-
ton, defendant to leave.
Reagan Houston VS.. August HOrnung,
debt. continued for services.
Arkansas Lumber Co. vs. Niggli & White,
promiSsOry note, judgment by default.
l.. c. McCujlOch ct al. VS.. Laurence
Reimann ct al, to toy title, transferred to
Forty ffth district.
Mrs. NJ. F. Clements ct al. VS.. Reagan
Houston, assignee, TO remove cloud from
title. Oct. IL.
Final papers in this court were granted
to Herman Jukle, a subject of the En-
peror OF Germany; to A. Fruhauf, sub
1ect of same; Ernest Dietzman, subject of
same: Friedrich ROtzler, subject of same;
Louis Dietzel, subject of same.
The grand jury reported bills on Nos.
GIL to 972S.
In the case of II. B. Adams and E. D.
L. Wickes VS.. John V. Dign owity, ct al,
to try title and for damages, Judgment
was rendered for defendant.
FORTY FIFTH DISTRICT COURT.
TbiS morning the fnilowinU huSiDaSS
was transacted:
In the case Of Carrie Birdsong ct al. VS..
T. r. Bonner and 7. NJ. Campbell. re-
ceiVers |. Il q. n. railway company, dam
ages, leave given to file demurrer to plain
tiff's petition; demurrer sustained and
case dismissed. Plaintiff excerpts and
gives notice Of appeal.
| IVnnlnn