Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1892-04-25
RECENT LEGAL DECISIONS.
rhev Arc Of Interest 10 Business
People.


Tho following are embraced IN
,,.. coiumpn published 10y q Journal
.,,,icJ EaLrios fgHcy GOOds aud
,n. ,'
N"'''"'. o...,,,y ,,,,g,rse.
IfdHycF ~ ""'s "' 'N'"
meHf'
vhsr, the lawful custodian Of
..,l.. q, ,t,c ,r,l.r II "A particu.
now P''' ..,...,.,. mann, and
hl P"9'N' i,,or.ni
transfers the note 10 hu iinoVe"'
purchaser for value, the latter acquires
notltle A ngalnst the payee.
Roach Va, Woodall. Supreme Court
,r-,,..,.a las w. Ron. t07.
VI
Damages yJr non dehrcry ~ VV'ue'
,,,t..., ,,,,d. mr.. purubsseu 10y
Nn''' 49,. 81, ii. mi
mefchah', "n" '"'''' wv
delivered. he cannot recover u'un"h'n
f,t such non.delivery uuless he shows
,.has hadan opupriunity tomake
'na. -" ,stich he wa- thereby prevented
- inr. or mas otherwise suffered
lfg,n , ~ isrnage nom the br, ach Of con-,
sg'u''
Waehsmith ". Han, supreme 'out'
oil 'Oio''5 5l.t.,.,,, ,or oosb,,l
h"Y'''y 'V
Where person y i,yu,u' w ~ ~
cideut occurring Nhho u'e "UHpioyN
Of another are enghseu W NvlN up9n
his premises he may recover u we
injury resulted lion INT htGlls' h'e "
the worknuu. But VI " was AZ WI
.H.NuN.fs uEFIIrnI. nuNIInNNA MlNn
negligence, hc IL entitled 10 no uhih'
ages.
Stten v. Willinmson, supreme court
Of California, ~ rae KEEP o.
Liagilty for employees scouray d,post.
Wh.,,. n clerk d,nosit. money with
his employer 70 be held az security lor
the faithful discharge Of bis duties, the
employers failure TO return lhe money
docs not constitute emotz1lcment,slnce
the deposit creates q deot anu not
trust, Where the CLERK " employee
tot q month, he " not entitled to re-
return OF the deposit before inc eni o.
the month, unless bis employer hhs IN
the mean time employed another per
con in his stead.
milford Y. People, Suproms Court OF
Illinois, IS \. II. Rep, 1925.
eay,os ,,.o,,. ,,,,,i,, 5,sstjy,,,y
""'' " 8'''' "''''''
Where goods are ordered and sold
by atraue designation which Imports
certain grade OF the goods, and without
Inspection by the buyer, there Is an
Implied warranty by the seller that
the goods arc OF tue quality lnileaIeu'
ANA where Ihe natut' o, tue uaus ,,'.
nuu ,, ~, 80 ~ ,,,''.'',,s,ii, Ia, Ia
..,i'', I, ~ s,,,,.', h,,,s', H. vl,irh
,uo,,. ,',.,.t''I A ~ Nj dufy 4, 80.
w.; 49, ''itaI' a., h'st aJ.rtsd 10
-, -
~, 80 :. tt,,io, s,,,b y.ras AZ.
49,. go y, ns'.,,r,, ~ 30 no., -
p''''i' w, " V.'s1,'' - -.
Damages yV' 'iyuNt. 20 "eu'IN 2"Oue
oOiB"''
a firm bought a carload OF goods 10
he shipped aud paid for on delivery.
The ncller shipped The car aud Tor
warded draft. The draft was pre-
scented before the car arrived, and pay
mont was refused, anu The buying ilrm
notified the seller that he hhd viola
the contract by demanding payment
before lne ueliseiy OF tne sSvus, anu
Wien tb.v arrived, Wb.n tl,. car mr..
rivsJ a MAS tendered 10 the bliyers.
anJ they r,fusod il. IL waa then sold
inr whai a vnuld hiring. which was lrss
ihan th, rontrart nriee. 'rhe Luyer.
were Ilall. for Inc deilcit
Mot'orj vs.. I,aldlry. surname court
nj Geoteia. I9S. n. Ran. 56g
L..,,.a.s. ',..,..,,,,r,. ~ 80. r...-
4"'""'go u .,S,Ss',.' ~ 49, P'''
'VU''''''V" y "''"'',''
"A mutual h-sersIneht INSURANCE
company mas no power, ia the hosonco
Of provision thefeior ~ its policies or
us rules anI regnlatiohr, TO charge u
member win an assessment made he
fore he became a member, or Tor losses
arising prior 10 MS membtnhip, anu,
thotelofri where the money deposited
ments was snfllcient 10 meet ali lawful
assessments made before his death, he
would NOT DC IN default by reason OF
lhe 'aIt Ihet tne COMPANY useu the
money oy applying u on an assessment
maue pilof 70 ms oesamlng ntmuer'
ENeIh vs. u :, Mutual Aceldent
srochlohi supreme 'ouH OF new
oIhi supp, ="
Notice " dissolution Of partnership.
Where an atternpt IL made 10 oh.rpe
with liability person who has retired
from the firm, on the ground that IN,
person selling tho goods Ind never
been Notified OF the dissolution,
.vfa.,a. a., tl,, ,.,,,g.t.., s...rt 80.