Democratic Northwest. [volume] (Napoleon, Ohio) 1869-1894, 1892-03-17
COMMON PLEAS
Heard at the February Term
of Court.
CIVIL DOCKET.

Stout, F. H. Short, t. WorthingtOn; con-
tinued.
A.y. Rrice & Co, vs Eliza D. Whetsell
contd.
ZE Rutan VS. W II Mitchell, contd.
JC Waltimire, treas. VS. s Pickens, contd'
Arthur Wagner, VS. G o Hobbs, contd.
Phillip Stamm VS. Jas K Brown; verdict
no cause of action.
PF Burk vs. Burk; contd with leave to
file answer 20 days after term.
Stephen Schmitz VS. Ludwig Meyer ano s.
Royal; contd.
Pohlman Bros VS. Wabash R R; leave to
plaintiff to file amended petition in 30 days
after term,
Peter Schey vs. Julia Schey; divorce de-
, creed.
Jas Newton va F Newton; continued
MARY A Domer vs. Hannah Solliday, death
of defendant; heirs made parties; contd.
Robinson IL Peugh, Ex, vs NJ & Guyer;
contd.
d. Nj. Harmon VS. F A Rowe; contd
Casper Sway VS. P Frank: decree for de-
fendent; plaintiff excepts and gives notice OF
appeal.
John D Babcock VS. Mary A Bordneri
contd.
VIM Kemmer vs. Anna Kinstler; contd.
JC Waltimire treas VS. Jas Barthouse;
dismissed without prejudice at plaintiff g
costs; iudg.
G 8 Miller vs. L V Betson; plaintiff Or
dered to give security for costs personally
or $40 in money before April l3 or case dis
missed.
Esther e Rowan vs D Meekison Jr; leave
defendent to file amended petition by Satur-
day one week.
Beni. Shannon VS. Grace M Shannon;
contd.
John @ Groll, treas VS. Inez Mullally;
contd. 80
John @ Groll, treas vs. F M Thompson;
contd.
John Wickenheiser VS. d E Dangler; contd.
HID Leist VS. F W Rhoads; leave plaintiff
to withdraw reply and file demurrer instan-
ter
&c Groll, treas VS. MulIally, G IIaskey'
L NJ. Hall; contd.,y I.
W.T. Minnick and q W Albright vsA ]
Fenzel: plaintiff leave to reply by Saturday
end.
JC Groil treas VS. R K Scott; found due
plaintiff $37.34; found due McCaskey s.
A Retteg VS. g Fashbaugh; leave plaintiff
to answer by Saturday LIST.
Margaret Vogel VS. B & 0 R; contd.
IT Fenton VS. e Worden; demurrer over
ruled: defendant excepts; leave to answer IN
40 days,
] JeakIe VS. J A King; contd.
Reidernan g. Harmon vs o Talmage; de-
murrer overruled; leave TOD hughes d Co
to file answer instanter; leave defendents tc
answer by 2nd Saturday; contd
Susan Kicker vs. Cath Weimer; report con,
firned, Judgment.
M Brown vs G Walker; contd.
Lydia Cramer vs M Cramer; dismlssec
without prejudice; Judgment.
RIB Heller vsJ W Racey; contd.
D. Meekison vs. NJ E Firman; contd.
Margaret X Lytle and Isabella R Lytle
ex. VS. Anna McCracken; heard on motion tt
make new parties; found due plaintiff S54o'
rs.
Catb Rhoades vs. unknown heirs Of
Beery, decd; contd.
CHRISTOPHER stuber VS. G " Fisher; dis
missed for want of prosecution.
Catharlne Malbury vs. Malbury; conto.
Henry J. Tressler VS. w Inman; contd.
George Daum, admr, vs. Christena Hon
eek; contd.
HI Fenzel, ct al vsJ Albright, ct al
leave defendent to file ans YER 80 days afte
term.
Melvin G Cutler VS. John B Mitchell, ct al
contd.
f. Gehringer VS. II Lange, ct al; no caus
for action; dismissed.
T Conway VS. Sub School Dist No y, Il
Damascus township, Henry Co, o; plaintiff
leave to answer 80 days after term.
Emily Hardy VS. W Hardy; contd.
Is Harley, as admir- &c, VS. Ann McWil
liams, ct al; contd.
Margaret vogel, as ext, &c VS. the B go
SO R'y Go; contd.
Carrie King, an infant, by Martha King
her next friend; defendant Leave to answer y
days after term.
J W Bishop, as admir- De VS. John Wicken
heiser as admr &c; defendant leave to an
swer 80 days after term.
Morgan Blue vs. The Go Com'rs OF Henri
Co J.. ct al; continued by ccnsent.
IF Smith admr vs. j p Nbersole; de
fendant leave to answer 80 days after term
Cbas R and Grant Stafford vs. Toled'
Spice Co; contd.
] Garster VS. s King. ct al; continued b.
consent.
The Moline Plow Co vsG w Johnson
demurrer sustained, plaintiff excerpts; leav
to answer in 80 days.
CD Potter as admir- &c vsJ L Sloug
ct ai; contd.
The Aul man & Taylor % vs. II Snyder
ct ai5 contd.
The Aultman g. Taylor Go vsJ II Snyder
ct al; eondt.
AB Long VS. d Foltz; demurrer over
-r,od. defendant leave to answer in 80 days
contd.
stephen Royal VS. F A Duding as Admin
&c. death of plaintiff, revived in name OF
Schwab; leave to answer in ~ days.
Sophia Besslingvs Henry Bessiing; divorc
decreed, alimony awarded.
Jacob Swoneland vs. VIM d Mitchell
continued by consent.
Salinda Collier VS. W ? Talmage. OF al
continued.
The State Of Ohio on the Relation OF tn
BOARD Of Directors of the County Infirmar'
OF Wood 90, O, vs the Board OF Directors Q