The Somerset herald. [volume] (Somerset, Pa.) 1870-1936, 1892-06-01

ishment. Accepted and sworn as the eiev-
enth juror.
Norman B. Penrod, stonemason. Somer-
set township, read about the case, but did
not make up or express an opinion. Ae-
cepted and sworn as the twelfth Juror
CASES CONTINUED.
The following cases were continued, the
defendants not being arrested; Common
wealth VS.. Reuben Spangler, F. & B., u ucy
A. Smith, prosecutrix same VS.. Alex koo-
erts, resisting an officer, on information OF
VIM. Gilbert, High Constable Of Somerset; +;
Same VS.. same, surety Of the peace, on infor-
nation OF wm. Gilbert; Same vs.. Michael
Fogle, selling liquor without license. on re-
turn Of Constable Martz; same vs- Edward
Z. Figge, F. & B., Ella Stern, prosecntrix; /;
ssme VS.. Abraham Hichew. F. & B., Carrie
Egulf, prosecutrix same VS.. James Murray
and Thomas Murray, A. 4 B. with intent to
kill, j. W. Pile prosecutor same vs.. Lewis
Fleegle, F. & B.. Nora UmbeTber. prosecO-
trix; same vs. Samuel II. Wright, +. &
B., Cora Shaulis, prosecntrix same vs.. same
adultery, Cora Shaulis, prosecutrix same
vs.. Peter Hertzle, F. & B., Mary f. Brick,
prosecutrix; same vs.. George Miller, F. & b,
Nettie 7. Heiple, prosecutrix; same VS.. John
P. Yogel. F. & B., Elizabeth Maust. prosecu-
trix; same vs.. james Murphy, William
Daugherty and John Roberts, burglary, W.
G. Lint, prosecutor; same VS.. David (. Bald
win, desertion Of his children, on iniorma-
ton of the Directors ofthe Poor, and same
vs.. d. c. Zimmerman and c. 4. Hay, mali
cious mischief, ]. II. Anderson prosecutor :
same vs.. Thos. Williams. violating the liquor
laws was mol pressed; same vs.. the borough
authorities Of Somerset, maintaining nui-
sance; same vs. Charles Wiltrout, Fred Tay-
lor and Norman Ringler malicious mischief.
CASES sETTLED.
Harry L. Cook. seduction and F. 4 B..
Hattie A. Miller, prosecutrix, and same vs..
II. S. P. Daniel, F. & B., Fannie C. Hoover
prosecutrix.
CASES TRIED.
Commonwealth VS. Frederick c. Brant and
Susan Brant surety of the peace, on infor-
nation Of John f. Pile. The court directed
Brant and Pile to enter into recog gnizance in
the sum of 500 for their good behavior for
q period ofone year; same vs.. John Black,
surety of the peace, on information of his
wife. Defendant sentenced to pay the costs
TEUR BILLS FOUND.
Commonwealth VS.. Samuel H. Wright
adultry, Cora Shaulis prosetriI; same VS..
Elmer Fordish, carrying concealed weapons /;
same VS. Jacob U. Brown, Rape, William
Young, prosecutor.
REPORT OF THE GRAND JURY.
To ne Honorable The judges Of The Court Of
Quarter Sessions Of Somerset o0uRty:
We the members Of the Grand Jury re-
spectfully report that in pursuance Of the
instructions Of your Honorable court. We
visited on the 27th day Of May 1892, and eI-
smined the jail and court house. The dry
closet connected with the jail does not give
satisfaction. We declare it . common nui-
sance. We recommend that the commits
sioners be asked to compel the Psuley Jail
Co., TO make the heater aud dry closet salts
factory.
The jail is neat and cleanly kept We
recommend that the broken place in the
court room ceiling be repaired. also, the roof
obove it, also, the flooring Of the belfry be
retinned, also, that the court house be painted
on the outside.
After a careful examination Of the sur
roundings Of the jail and court house we
found fences and gates in dilapidated con
ditiOn. also. the yard or lawn is in such g
condition that reflects no credit on the par
ties having it in charge. We recommend
that gates and fences be repaired aud that
the yards or lawns surrounding court house
and jail be put in good condition.
b. F. SNYDER, foreman.