The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1892-02-06
ELLIOTT zEOROUskI NOT Il p1R1E
Baron de Stuers May Not Accuse Him of
Adultery with the baroness.

To THE EDITOR OF The SuN-Sir: enclose
you copy OF tho Sionr Falls argus Leader
showing the denial Of the motion made recently
by NJ. de Stuers's counsel. II seems to me that
the dcfendant in tho case Of De Stucrs agt De
Stuers could and did publish everything that
he cared to which would injure the reputation
OF or hurt the feelings OF his wife or OF Mr.
Iborowsk but the other side-our side of the
case-never seems to have its day in the news
Al the allegations of the defendants atrlda-
VT on the 2Uh ult. were stated to PLAINTIFF
attorneys by defendants attorneys ut Sioux
Falls when serving the original answer. and
wore also stated to me in Paris in November
last. on the first lny, Of taking testimony.
B9fh the Piainiilt,s attorney at sioux Falls
to Pnrs the ans
terry aud to have The issue tried but he refused
to do this. well knowing that nothing was
most riGhteonsly denied by the Court Court" u was
his own order TO show cause and his counseIs
pose Of delay and to annoy ana injure the rem
n m OF tn. nlaintin and Of Mr. Zhorowski.
plainiii! Is not trying her case in tho newsDp-
pc!s but in court. amt upon the merits: hit
she does. as do FOR hor and for MIR Zboro Wv.
the press, il ,they are going to mention the
ZEE. l. lSJI. liERBGRT 4. SHiPMAN
From he Siotr FdLs A.yp-L,adsr
Those who have believed TINT tIera ,r.s "a
BIO simply straw fight in the De Stuers di.
beir m S1se aaES by this time changed
Paris: ana eyerywer Witch inI Ii nt tSat
'a on s samy f thn.
lev days ago j; l. Glover. attorney for Baron
and n ass k m1tGn to amend his
plaintiff to show cause why the IN otion should
no! b F1ane4 ,b, The bearing IF was
the amendment is 10 charge the iniiJeitv ~ ~
,hs plainiiil with William Fl lott zboroSski. OF
OF Baron de Stuers. who says he is loath to in
lGct ms feature into the case, but that he now
d zee r. 1t hest; He swears that the plainiiY
anu Mr.. Elliott took steam yacht togelLer
and went to The island OF Geylon. and Thence
70 70 India on their return TO London. he swears.
"ndon as and te Mrs a'S Wn H Hiis,t II
Thi, WIS on Fst ~ is'l; He SAYS they ' We're
IN March. 1881. and alleges that their iInproperr
f feaInns YE GsHss fsiGrs the snn tn the DO
and Ustober the t tm mites al s ss
Chateau hat ds fontenoy. Department d Cher.
Mo anss at the nts Of .n Anna dc
where irregularities occurred. N
The motion came up for. argument at
tRs doene and Cart sodiard ana srGsr '2r
s S;hIlpma moi OF New York for the paintih Mr.
and " dd not s hSks to-
n pro Of those facts at the time the answer
change desired by the defence Was com t .e
change Of the, issue as joined. and was in.
tended not only for delay. but to tarnish the
name oi the plaintiff and to cast a stain unon
her Tho court oyerruled the motion 'OA
capt Stoddard then moved that the case be
tried when 1t was reached ON the caIendnr
which would be in u lew days. Mr, Glover rs.
sisted this and presented IL the court n stip,I
latinn sigped by Mr.. SlIipman and tho Parisian
counsel inr the Baron that the cas-. should not
lie moved for trial before Fet. y CAPT st,d.
dard argued that his stipulation was now void.
make tho motion To amend. that this motion
had now been disposed Of. and that the stipu-
ed this and the Court held the stipulation sooJ.
Vhe case cannot be tried before Feb. 81 S"