The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1892-05-13
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.
No. $50 Equity. In the Circuit Court for Gar
rett county. William II. Rolfe, Plaintiff, VS..
Annia Rolfa nafanhapt

NO. oS Equity. In the CIRCUIT court Tor Gar
rett county. William H. Role. Plaintiff, VS..
Annie L. Rolfe. Defendant.
The object of this suit is to procure decree
OF said Court, divorcing the plaintiff from the
defendant a cincuto ndtrimonii.
The bill states: LIST. That the said VIM. Fl 4,
Role, the plaintiff, was married to the defen-
dant, then Annie +. Hughes, on the 9Th day
oi November in the year 1885, in Garrett
county, Maryland, ever since which time the
plaintiff has resided In said county and Slate;
and the defcndent during the greater portion
of said time.
Ind. That said parties lived and co-habited
together as man and wife in said county,
during the said time, with the exception OF
two intervals, of two and seven tonths re-
spectively, during which said intervals, the
defendant abandoned and left the plaintiff
and refused to reside with him; and that
about the middle ofOctober last, the defend
ant finally left the abandoned plaintiff and
is living apart from him; and the plaintiff is
informed and believes that she is now roam
Ing about from place to place without any
home or fixed place of abode; and the plain
tiff does not know at what particular point or
place she may now be, he not having seen
her nor received any exact information con-
corning her since the 10th OF last October: but
he believes that she is still somewhere in
Garrett county aforesaid.
Sd. That some time after the plaintiffs said
marriage with the defendent, he discovered
that the defendant had been guilty OF adultery
with another person or persons aud that he
had no knowledge OF this fact until long
time after his said marriage with the de.
PENDANT.
4th. That subsequently TO her said marriage
to the plaintiff the defendant has been guilty
of the offence of adultery, and the plaintiff
believes her to be utterly lewd and unchaste
9TH. The bill alleges that the abandonment
of the plaintiff by the defendant is deliberate
and final, and without any reasonable cxpec-
tatiou of reconciliation.
9th. That there was one child born since
the said marriage; of tender years and now
in the custody ofthe plaintiff.
9TH. The bill then prays for Il divorce a rim
culo mdtriDtonii, and for general relief
Two successive suhpoenas having issued
for the defendant in this case, and been sue
cessively returned honest by the sheriff of
said county, ii Is thereupon adjudged and
ordered by the Circuit Court for Garrett
county sitting as Court OF Equity, this 5th
day of May, 1892. that the complainant, by
causing copy of this order to be inserted in
some newspaper published at Oakland In
Garrett county aforesaid, once q week for
four successive weeks, at least fifteen days
before the 18th day of June, 1892. give notice
OF the object and substance of this bill, and
warn her TO appear in this Court In person or
by solicitor. on or before the said :7th day of
June. 1892, to answer the premises and show
cause, ifany she has. why decree ought not
TO pass as prayed,
f. u. TOWER,
True copy-test: Clerk.
+. u TOWER, Clerk. ll-it