The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1892-09-04

TIE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR
L the Third judicial district Of Utah territory,
county OF Salt Lake The National Bank %
the Republic, plaintiff vs. the Metropolitan IN
vestment company. E. N. Perkins. 3. A. Amr
bier. G.. W. E. Griffith and George J. Barker,
defendants-summons- The people Of the ser-
ritory OF Utah send greeting; To the Metropolis
tan Investment company, =. NJ Perkins, b. A.
Amber, G.. W. c. Gri1nth and George j. Bar
keT, defendants. You are hereby required 70
appear in an action brought against you by the
the Third judicial district Of the territory oe
Utah, and 70 answer the complaint fled therein
within ten days exclusive OF the dsy OF servlca)
after the service on you OF this sumrnons-if
this county. but in this district, within twenty
days; otherwise within forty days-or judgzens
by default viii be taken against you. according
to the prayer Of said complaint The said
action Is brought TO have Judgment against Do
PENDANTS on two causes Of action as follows. To-
wit: First-fn sum of sA0cc. with interest
from May IS. 1902. ut per cent. per month, 500
attorneys fees and costs OF suit alleged TO DO
due upon certain promissory note, made By
defendant company. endorsed BY defendants
Perkins, Griffith. Amber and Barker IN favor
of plaintiff, for 5000. December 10, 1881, with
interest after maturity on non payment At
per cent per month; sams being due and Wholly
unpaid, Sesond-IH sum Of $1,000 with inter-
est thereon al per cent. per month from May
10 1892, and 81, 600 attorneys fees. alleged 70
be due on certain pronfssory note executed
70 plaintiff DY defendant company ana snssrsea
Barker. December 10. 1891. for A3O0o with In
terest after maturity or nos-psyment at rata Of
per cent. per month; same being due ana
wholly uRpaid. And you are hereby notified
that If yeu fail 20 appear and answer the said
complaint as above required. tbs SAID plaintiff
will sakc Judgment against you FOR the sum Of
80 100. SIC 90. with interest and attorneys ices
~ above. and costs of suit.
witness. the Hon, Charles 8. Zane, Judge,
and the seal OF tho district court OF the Third
judicial district in and for the territory OF Uran
ihis 10Th day Of june. in the year Of our Lord
one thousand eight hundred and ninsty-tvo-
tsEALJ HENRY O. MCMILLAN Clerk
Bv GEO =. LoohIs DEPUTY Clerk
TN THE PROBATE COURT OF TIE
Il county ofDaviB. territory OF Utah. In rhe
matter Of the estate OF Edgar Foukes.
deceased. Order TO show cause why
order Of sale OF real estate should
not be made. Eliza Foukes, the admin
stratrix OF the estate Of Edgar Foukss. de-
ceased having nled her petition herein prayine
for an order Of sale of portion OF the real es.
tate Of said decedent. for the purposes tssreiB
set forth. II Is therefore ordered Dy B1if oourc.
IN At all persons interested Ia the estate or said
deceased. appear before the said court on Non
day, the 18th day OF september. 1882 At n
O'Clock in the forenoon Of said day, a. tAe court
room OF said court, at Pennington, IN the county
not DO granted TO the said misunderstanding to sell
40 much Of the real estate OF the said deceased
"a shall be necessary. And that copy OF this
order be published at least four successive
weeks Ia TEE SALT LAKE HERALD. . news
paper printed and published in Salt Lake city
Salt Lake county, Utah
Dated Aug Is, 1892.
HECTOR W. HAIGHT. Judzs.
g. w. DARKE Attorney Tor Adnlnisfrotrtx