San Antonio daily light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1886-1907, 1892-11-29
THE COURTS.
FoRTY-F DISTRICT coUR'

Yesterday afternoon before Judge KIM
the following business was transacted:
1924. Dan p. Smith ct al. VS.. Annabell;
NJ. TAFT ct al, Diet; judgment TO
plaintiffs, to which plaintiffs and defend
ants except and give notice of appeal.
1880. K. c. Chamberlain VS.. JOSEPH
Hermann, appeal from justice court
defendant asks for jury.
l447. Matilda Myers VS.. Ed Myers, di,
vorce; continued by plaintiff.
l4l4. Lucy McLennan VS.. Donald Nc
Lehman, divorce; Judgment for plaintiff
MORNING SESSION.
1911. Goldfrank, Frank & Co. VS., P
Pena Guerra. debt, plaintiff asks leave tC
tile first supplemental petition.
l469, Mrs. Manuela Morales, Guer-
gum and Carlos Guerguin, VS., Anton
Weinert, suit to adjust boundary line, sci
for Friday, December End.
1889, Goldfrank. Frank & Co vs., P. c.
Taylor; debt, judgment for plaintiff.
1910. A. b. Frank VS.. II. A. Standard
suit on promissorry note, judgment by
default.
1911. Goldfrank, Frank & Co., VS.. P.
Pena Guerra, debt, judgment by de-
fault
1914. Goldfrank, Frank & Co. VS.. l. N.
Powell, on promssory note and fore
closure of lien; judgment for plaintiff.
1927. Jean e. Loustonau VS.. Augustine
Torres, Sr. ct al, to remove cloud from
1881. Mary Harvey VS.. E. Harvey, d.
vorce; continued for service.
1882: M. F. Ellis VS.. +. H.!Hartz and s.
NJ. Ellis, on promissory note; continued
for service.
1912, BeXar Building and Loan Associa-
tion vs. VIII. Bennett, on promiSsory
note, judgment by default.
l543. Mrs. c. f Millett VS.. Earnest
RiSche ct al, breach of contract. set for
December 10, defendant asks for Jury.
1916, j. M. Campbell VS., j. B. Stuart.
on Promissory note, judgment by de-
15i7. Merchants and Mechanics Build
ing and Loan association VS.. w. T.
Chalkey, on promiSSOry note and to fore
close vendors lien: continued.
15iS, William Dobrowrlski VS.. E. s.
,Harwood ct al, on DromisSory note and
TO fOreclOse lien. set'for December end.
1902 j. H. H. Davis ct al. VS.. Juan
Bargas ct al, to try title and for dam
ages: confined for services.
l5O2. w. c. Silliman VS.. l. Frank, gar
niShment; dismissed at plaintiffs cost.
1920. RoSenShine Brothers VS.. Mrs. lice
Hill ct al, debt; defendant r. j. Hill asks
for jury and case set for December 22nd,
1921. A. j. Fang VS.. Alice Hill ct al,
debt; set for December 22nd; defendant
RI. Hill asks for jury.
l47l l. ]. Hart vs.. J. F. Burns, T. C.
l. ambeth and E. j. Pietzcker, on promis-
sorry note and foreclosure of lien; judg-
ment by confession against Lambeth and
EUrrs and ease set for Decem Der End.
LOSS. RonSeS Wahstab VS.. Freeberg
Klein Il Co., trial of right of property,
continued
1,43O, International Building and Loan
association VS.. 5. p. Darnall, debt and
foreclosure of lien, defendant asks for
jury
1895. R. II. McCracken VS.. j. P.
TOGO FAr
ember lSt.
PLAIN TIFF ASKS FORJCRY
In the following cases:
l,52I, l.. G. Goodwin VS.. Galveston
Houston & San Antonio Railway COM
pany, damages; set for December 18th.
1922. E. III. Waldo VS. Galveston, Har-
Sisburg and San Antonio railway COM
PAW. damages; set for December 18th.
1873. William Z. Norris VS.. Galveston
Harrisburg and San Antonio railway
company, damages; set for December
18Th.
1924. James Leonard VS.. Galveston,
Harris burg and San Antonio railway
company, damages; set for December
18th
1888. GuadaIoupe Trevino vs.. C. NJ.
Smith. TO try title and for damages: set
for December 21St.
1926. Ii. c. DayhOft VS.. International
and Great Northern railway company.
appeal from justice court.
1887. &c. Ason VS.. 0. S. Ekhardt ct al,
damages and breach of contract; set for
December 22nd.
1910 p. H. Wentworth VS.. Interna-
tiOnal * Great Northern railway com
pany and 7. NJ; Campbell, receivers.
damages.
124l. PriestIy W Halle VS.. San An
tonic street railway company, damages.
THIRTY SEVENTH DISTRICT.
Yesterday afternoon the grand jury
was rPcOnvened aud w. A. Wallace,
Modesto Torres, Herman Faust. Antonio
Herrera, Martin Stahl and Adam Irvine
were sworn in as baiiffS.
This morning in the case of Homer f
Metty VS.. Alva n. Wilcox, on judgment,
judgment for plaintiff
In the case of Lucy OchSe ct al. vs.
ThOS. n. Gray, debt and for appointment
OF receiver; judgment was given for de-
tendaut.
9lS5; Tom Yates, gaming, judgment nisF
set aside.
1882. Charley Campbell, gaming, iudg-
= ment niSi set aside.
1884. Dick Strayhorn. gaming. Judgment
, niSl set aside.
9759. William F. Hetzel, assault to kill
and murder, continued by consent.
!ic1. John Molina ct al, burglar sew
erance granted; case dismissed against
each.
966l. John MIoina ct al, theft under
$50; dismissed against each.
NEW SUITS FILED.
This morning new suits we're filed as
follows:
In the Thirty seventh District court
Mary Wilson filed suit against Levi Will
son for divorce, alleging abandonment
! and adultery with lewd women. There
is one child girl, Ala Wilson, aged six
months.
In the Forty-fifth District court, Hunt
e Booth filed suit on sworn account
against Aresti & Co.
A garnishment suit was filed by Hunt