The advocate and Topeka tribune., 1892-09-28
GEO. T. ANTHONY's EMBEzZLEMENT
OF THE SCHOOL FUND.

OF THE SCHOOL FUND.
We have had several requests to fur
niSh the proof of GeOrgeT. Anthony'S en-
bezzlement of the school fund In New
York state, and we therefore publish the
following records of the supreme court
of the state Of New York:
State of NelO York, Supreme Court, Albany
County.
The people Of the sta Of New York against
George T. Anthony, Robert L. Hll Isaac w.
Swan and Augustus M. Ives. Summons for
money demand on contract. (C0m. not Beryed)
To the defendants:
You are hereby required to answer the COM
plslnt In this action, which will be fled In the
Office Of the clerk Of the city and county Of
Albany, at the city hall In Albany, aud to serve
copy OF your answer to the said complaint on the
SuOSc her, at his office In the state hall, In the
city OF Albany, within twenty days after the SER
vice Of this summons on you, exclusive Of the
day OF such service; and II you fail to answer the
said complaint within the time Aforesaid, the
plaintiffs In this action will take Judgment
against you for the sum Of three hundred and
fifty and 25lO0 dollars, with interest from the 9th
day Of November, one thousand eight hundred
and fifty-nlne, besides the costs VI this action.
Dated February 13 1866.
j. II. MARTINDALE,
Attorney General, for plaintiffs,
Supreme Court.
The people of the state Of New York against
George 7. Anthony, Robert L. Hill, Isaac w.
Swan and Augustus M. Ives.
hereby admit due service of q copy Of the an
neXed summons made on me at the city OF New
York this second day Of March, 1856
l. W. SWAN.
Supreme Court, Albany County.
The people OF the state Of New York against
George T. Anthony, Robert L. Hill, Isaac w,
Swan and Augustus IA. Ives. Complaint
The people Of the state Of New York, plaintiffs
In the above entitled action, by j. H. MArtiI dale.
their attorney general, complain Of the above
named defendants, and respectfully show to this
court:
That on or about the twentieth day of April, In
the year one thousand eight hundred and fifty
nine, George 7. Anthony, one Of the above
named defendants was duly appointed one Of
the commissioners n lOanlug certain moneys Of
the United states, for the county Of Orleans, In
the state OF New York, 81 d entered upon, and
continued to hold said office until on or about
the 9Th day Of APRIL 1861; that the defendants,
George 7. Anthony, Robert L. Hill, Isaac w.
Swan and Augustus NJ Ives, did, In pur'u-
ance OF the statutes In such case made and pro-
Vided, on the twentyslxt day Of April ln the
year aforesaid, under their hands and seals, ex-
ecute and deliver to the said plaintiffs certain
bond or writing, ObigatOry, wherein and whereby
ally, to be held and firmly bound unto the people
Of the state Of New York In the sum Of nine thou
sand three hundred and thity-fOur and SO 100
dollars, 70 be paid TO the said people, cOndi-
toned, that "f the said George T. Anthony,
duly appointed one Of the commissioners for
leaning certain moneys Of the United States for
the county OF Orleans, shall well, truly and faith
fully perform the duties Of said commissioner,
pursuant TO an act entitled, AN act authOriZDg0
loan Of certain moneys belonging 70 the United
States, deposited with the state OF New York for
safe keeping, and shall discharge his said duties
without favor, malice or parClality, then this OBJ
legation 70 be void; otherwise TO remain In fun
force and virtue"
And the plaint ifs allege and aver that the said
defendant, George I. Anthony, has not kept and
p.rfOfmed the c0nd tons Of the said bond or
writing obligatory according to the tenor and
effect OF the same, but on The contrary thereof
has failed In the performance Of bis duties Of
said commissioner, In not having accounted to
the said plalutif for the moneys placed In his
hands as such commissioner. and In having re-
talned in his hands portion OF said moneys con-
trary 70 law.
And The said plaintiffs aver that there was due
TO them from the said defendant, George T An
thOny, on the 9ih day Of November In the year
1859 and Is still DUE the sum Of three hundred
and fifty and rs 100 dollars, which the said de-
fendAnt has neglected and refused, and still does
neglect and refuse TO account for or pay over 70
The said plaintiffs.
By reason whereof an action has accrued 70
said plaintiffs, TO have and demand OF and from
said defendants herein the full sum Of three hun
dred and nifty and 2-l0O dollars.
WHEREOF the PLAINTIFFS demand judgment