davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
Scranton Wochenblatt. [volume] (Scranton, Pa.) 1865-1918, 1892-01-28
XVI.
Yropioence-Sbbe 4arf-0unmore.

lamb sssn, ssn 3 5 s4s g s i'm sss ss S.
ammtm Ser aadapanna 5Ib ss sanSti wurbs 177o in
1Upnibps gttsn uno 9so auses sres umfaBts bic
i'd nod G a Sas s aa ss1 g ss
% S MS @ s u f~ s I9a sGe Sa e % %
ais Or 1892 unS as Borough s4s orsan nafonOn
9 er anibuns grOpbenc 9opnibip 9mobp
ss unO Saomom Sodiss sma bic SafrO Conn., fam
ben ban ieSm ais s ers befann n ssissn aadaanna
ea NJ sas sS @ % s fen BON Sn msansa sS 5 5
% d % s % 5 % ns IN n n senm sssss ss9na .s ang s IS
seus wsasoD anssss9 samss assst D IN ms
I as aasa s quite sss s G s 5 sss %
patsr sin emnSad far nss gs unO ens Sni&int Spp
s sD a s aa" iss ssst fp Saisr % osb $ aas s
S s in s G Isissr 1s Danb bic mss anOs @ssnS
ssa'%'a sessIsn w '' mare" "' ' S 9'a bic 5'' ""'
ast app Der ensl unD saa se ate nsba sss unssn asn
sss b 9Odip puSn em Sabre nbansrR sefansn
be as app ntn bic aber mad @sssnb sn
abfs ssf9r gOt une prt ap nssn drs ansrat
s aas ss s s s pSs ns , Msso s ns s % init ben
sommsr maronnbn Snbianem 9OHen Gam Su i77s)
aS a Sage ST. Sobn am naan Sage 70 Sa Vu sa sn
aser wsibsr ssipOtnsr qropOenes aOpnbp Osrbib
D ps bon s s'st% as @ S s'S aases m sa
d"ss sta @ bic sn sa s S nas~ 81 % ssT sn @ essa @ Die %
SS sm Mas our aaas snsn Sas psns mas s sntst
ssss1stn ss nssstsn sonns ss Ssss
Snsn su Ssis s CAB ss Bart nod Suamsr
County 1886
au eeorbneter &tstdn beanIabte 8 i Yroptne
Saaf Ip Obn etspben famn bsim Sabre
3bobe SSIano mb Iben f in 1888 permanent 8ropon nSer
gno@ sOmss bon assts gans q o. b9 unS .rrits Oas M
Wobnbus apbae Borough 3n Der iben presbptedn rde
unb Der Saprabe bon BrOScne mad pbe Bari un bic gporne
msr s @ s @ s asa S M % as s @ sss nns ssa
germeRuns ton felt 90 Sabn sRrts s&nams Ort@aft crit
i'm ueuf 1892 bud 8ss @ets serns Gountp aus
nsm ab.s BON aaawan eret une par in anbstrat gtn
bon aa 1rpp nb Mnoeren, e bes ,baB bic Mnung
pon unr srobn nsbeanbn b brn gnaub adawanna en
bat bab bic epobner peit bm abe Ibn bel Onn nan
bic Ortspermmlunen attfnbn uno bB e br 1Immen u
reuaen baben Der aetpeie unpaiuba 1T" u f. m.
Cine Bride G ben 2adapana sa eS nit WabIen
pubn Der Npropfi be8 Sromes abaen De ee DrdatS.
Semmns qrouDenc nb 1918 i'm u Spbn Irpp obeaIb
Sboe Bart att sbe IbtS ben mfans DorfS bate Die
g8dr 9ropbn bamals bic 8wObnr gIat Sefrion
Tbde8 So Greenb 2adapanna GoSnon tessIen
Soum Soaow unb Dunmo Gs felen 1918 49, in 1914 83
Stmmn uno bel bn SSabn bic 5DSran ben DOatsn
pbn Stmnlen pcraus.
Ser s6bt 9bs Sss aanSes Der Orid qrODbens fam
in ben 8eb BON Sam ffn, 8er ca Somes e 8odbaus
uno nit Oem Aen uno Srsnn bss paIbeS bssann Die abe
sns lansam bondrtS 10 ansam bab 1916 br MnFer-b
Deui Dael Warmana unb Sams GbomaS rEn-m
oe bsS pateren Borough pnn Cine Bride lbr 2adaanna
nod INNER n bobanben ub mube bnIben 8erb Tuf
fsussn stsm ped Stasn pats aussadt
Scranton Wochenblatt. [volume] (Scranton, Pa.) 1865-1918, 1892-01-28
9is
~. st o b / 10 fon
0ierbrQuerei,

@de @ebar Gbenue unb gllbsr StraBe,
GmpFebIt ibr auSsesei9neteS Sabri'
fat ben berebrten Wirtben beifenS.
Scranton Wochenblatt. [volume] (Scranton, Pa.) 1865-1918, 1892-01-28
Ma DeutiAe Wereine.

Die beutftsn 8ersins Der Stabt Scranton
pfrbsn earauf aufmerflam sema6t, pab bic
8rtsssr.Sanp jfpsr,eit fur Bale, pir Nies
unb paraesn ensasirt psrben fann. Mulif
gut une su nisersfen prfifsn. slnmelpunstn
3u MAIDEN BET eeaber @ueuf Dunnsmann,
S2S @lm Strabs; ober bel Sauptmaun 8ranf
MOasr pom Srisssr @srein 1903 prospsct
Ipenue. 29,6m
Scranton Wochenblatt. [volume] (Scranton, Pa.) 1865-1918, 1892-01-28
Senti9e Meetgerci
BON
Gaspar Semnp,
SO. 416 @ab @aibinstom gpenue.

9ae 8leifdiorten bon Der beften NuaIitat
nno tets fr,idl; oesglei6su Die idmadbafte.
fen @iirite ieber @rt.
Sie beften edintsu unS elm ausae3eidnetes
Corn Beef uno bas feinfe RodeIHeiib ftets
in grober Iuswabl.
Beitellnngen per Yoit weroen prompt aus.
gsfibrt uub 5u eincm 8eiude bes Seiddfies
freunolitft eingeIaeen.
Scranton Wochenblatt. [volume] (Scranton, Pa.) 1865-1918, 1892-01-28
Sibiette Mn;eisem.
Stephan Gutheinz,
SemtS0erM eB0er,

5IS y 52O Nebar N1enne,
,tpif&su albsr unb 5idurs Strabsn, smpfsbIt
tinem perebrten publifam lein @el1Gft auf's
Bette. 6leiiG jeber @rt ltefers Id gum biIlis-
fen pretff unb In better Nualitat, unb ma&t
t@ iiberaus auf bic BON mir subereitsteu Sprs
,Hali&en Biirfe aafmetffam.
Telepbons8erbinbun
The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1892-12-22

Every patriotic American. whether resid-
ing in tho United States or in the Dominion
ofCanada. will agree with Mr.. ERAsTus W.
MAN In the opinion expressed by him on
Tuesday ut Woonsoclist. Rhode Island. that
the most important relation TO be estub-
lished between the United States and Cam
ada is ono involving continental free
trade" Free trade ia tho natural pol
Icy to prevail among the people Of
this continent. They look for IL with
unreserved eernes.ness and hope. and for
that reason they favor the admission OF
Canada into the greatest free trade associa-
ton ever known. the peerless 9lee trade sys-
tenn OF tho States of the Federal Union.
But let the union be complete and perfect
Absolute harmony in commerce can exist
only with the identity o! interest and al
legiance which Will cCme with the final
amalgamation OF the two great divis-
Ions OF this continent into Il nation
with single purpos" an,, II single destiny.
Our free trade union ~ great to-day. It
will DO greater :Lan the dreams Of the most
imaginative political Spectator when the
United States OF North America reach from
the Gulf Of Mexico beyond liudSon'S Bay.
Let lis lave Greater United States.
The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1892-12-22
xiRASDAs COLUMBUS FOUNTAIN
The city WIN Select the site Tor 1tscir-Bids
Considered by the Park Board.

fernando Miranda. the sculptor OF tho Co.
Mmhus fountain which the Circulo Colon.
Ceramics has offered to the city. appeared 10.
fore the Roar,l of Park Commissioners at iheir
meeting yesterday aud presented II memo.
rial on behalf Of the society. which represents
fifteen Governments OF Spanish. speak, ing poo.
PIE requesting that tho fountain lie placed in
the plaza at tho entrance to Central iark.
Tifty.ninth street and FiNh avenue Land
scare Architect NauX recommended that 1t lie
erected In Battery Park or Mount Morris Park
President lana said II mad been minated
that the Spanish residents would not give tho
fountain to the cit. unless they could havo
tho particular cite asked Tor sculptor MI.
randi replied ho was not empowered to speak
Tor The donors On that score. President Dam
said tina, tho city had never accepted any gift
ot II monumental kind with ~ condition as -
Its location made Ivy the donors. and he sug-
Eesl"d TINT III" sculptor ""nf"r with the m"m-
nj ',on"rs on lust whut terms they prnros" To
mggkstne, Fi''. ,'rhl. Senior Miranda Nll do.
SENIOR Mirnnda's work il something more
than fountain, its principal feature heins It
t Err MA E r., IN hron%c rnr"s sntlnr olnm
base The ilgnrrs are ot heroic size.
ara, ,hgs wsiH %mcneG hy tho ia k ,"mmi ssion-
castle Garden AGunrium fUr iuilding Il tool
h"G5Hnnd II portable skn!cys' house Tor Com
!, ~ '''dSt' HHu lOr cOhcltlliE mo
t"iooi,, OF W." iond at FIFTY ninth street
,,unh McHntrs secured the contract for
me lowest lth for tn" skaters house was
Ii..-Ou oyer Ne I"pattn"nts estimate. aud
me consideration uf til" bids was tost,ourd
aud n resolution adopted asking n,ruIi.si6m
ron the Board OF Nidermen TO iuilt shelter
iYtthe skaters wit on; advertising for further
WAS informal; and all were ieIec,rd Tho
llt!d lo!c, ramp tomplny Of ior'.pnrt, =.
D.. secured III. contract to supply the auLln.
rum filters with bid 90 So. The bids i0r
'oraEe were rejected. and those Tor conc,r,.
ing the bottom OF the Central Pad. pond wrr.
referred to Engineer keliogg for tALMlatinn
The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1892-12-22

To THE EDITOR OF TEE SUN-Sir: Permit a
frequent reader Of THE Sun. interested In its
recent articles on the Briggs controversy. to
raise the question whethorthe Protestant doc
trine concerning tho Bible has been correctly
represented in those articles
Luther and Calvin are both Oh record as
freely recognizing various defects and errors
in the Bible Luther. in particular rejected
entire books Of the Bible as wanting in credi-
bility. His position was that the conscience,
us instructed by Christ is capable ofrecogniz-
ing in the Bible what is and what Is not divine.
Had this principle been adhered to it would
have saved much present controversy. Tho
principle was not original with Luther 1t was
introduced BY Jesus in His Sermon on the
Mount. whore He expressly sets aside some
Old Testament precerts. as those about swear
ing. and conduct toward enemies. aud cor
marked retroErade from his took place n
hundred and fifty years after Luther: Then it
was that tho ntra-Drtho,lo school arose in
Switzerland. holding that all statements OF
the gtbIS H WeT ri ipfaibis even the words the
Ivy the way not having beeE Invented till
about the NTH century after Christ. Tho OK.
tremo OF this absurd assertion as to letters
OF favor. but the substance Of il still survives
IN the argument now maintained at Princeton.
mMy sfIs wer s
inerrnnt, This ghost Of The Swiss speculation
III the seventeenth century II now struggling
to hold its ground against 10th learning ana
common sense. Tho assertion that we have
In the Hihle nm infalliule hook-an assert ion
Regulated by mon like Luther and Calvin is
reduced to the PROPOSE ion that these once We're
infalliDlo writings. whose infallibility has been
lost. AS to this. since NOBODY can know. mo-
body need care.
We have then. at any rate. even tho ultra. or
thodoN admitting it. Bible which, in tho form
1t HOW possesses. cannot be in!aliblc. hut has
to stand for what truth there is in 1t. This be-
Ing 30. tho popular impression ~ stated by
TIE sun. that III tho iiihle Is not true alto
gother it is not true ut all, can hardly DO rea-
sonuble ii it can be affirmed Of tho Bible. it
must DO affirmed Of all books whatever. None
is true altogether, therefore none is true at
all. The Bible. he Ii observed here nowhere
claims for itself to be free from error through
out. That claim wns inverted hy its foolish
friends. and is welcomed by It's clever encmios.
II it has any. 1t is a, doctrine which has en-
gendered 10 small part OF modern az
Mysticism and skepticism by its insist
ence that even those statements Of the BIZ
dictory. Repmdiated at length by most Chris
tian scholars. it dies hard. and its death throes
create the present hurry.
an, no Prosbyterian. and have no interest
IN this affair beyond that o! u thoughtful
observer. As such am bound to say that, so
far from Dr. Brig.s's nosition being heretical
to Professionalism. 1t IL In exact line with that
Of the original Protestant reiormers. They
held that inspiration was one thing and inial-
libility another. and the supreme authority not
the Book. but the Christ 10 the hook.
~ West Forty seventh street.
The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1892-12-22

pr. HE!IGSS long defence of himself was
very ;ldroit. very subtle. and very able. II
was an arttully constructed legal arg,i-
ment. betokcning intellectual ucutrncss aud
unusual power of logical statement
In substance. his effort WAS to prove orto
make it appear that the herrsy, If hercsy
there be. is in the clumsy Indictment of him
rather than in the teachings against which
1t pronounccs. He took an attitude Of SUI
periorty to his accusers twitting them with
ignorance OF ii subject chronological investi-
cation as to which lie WAS able to show that
his own knowledge is both precise and COM
preheiisive. lie was on ground familiar to
him by long and close stgdy, but known to
them by hnnr,ay alone. Hence when with
grim humor he suggested that they must
have been rltmTcl for their task infer
entially by his Princeton enemies, he was
probably not far from the truth. Thus. too,
he bro:ght into prominence the absllrdity
OF referring abstruse questions Of pure
scholarship and deXtcrous Theological con-
troveIsy 10 The decision Of Il jury OF minis
ters and laymen who are comparative ig-
AOramuse> concerning them.
The DunSling construction OF the charges
against him gave DR.. BRIGGS this opportu-
nifty. but he would have deserved more
honor il he had refused to take advantage
Of II and had mot frankly and squarcly tho
issue between him and his accusers as it is
In spirit and essence. That issue is simply
whether the Bible Is Divine or human,
whether it comes from COP us His inspired
Word. or whether it is imperfect with the
tmperfection insepnrabie from all human
authorship.
We publish elsewhere letter from cor
respondent who has boon diverted from
this real issue by tho artfu!ncss OF tho
argument OF Dr.. BRIGGS. Iie thinks The
Sun has not correctly represented the
Protestant doctrine concerning tho Scrip
lures In saying that Professionalism depends
on tho absolute authority OF tho Biblo as
tho infaliblo Word of GOD. Our Bible. no
says. "capnot be infallible. but has to stand
for what truth there is in it," "tho con-
science as instructed by CHEIsT" being
"capable OF recognizing in tho Bible what
Is and what is not Divine" THE supreme
authority" no explains further. "is not tho
Book. but the CHRIsTin the Book" and that,
he says. is the true Protestant doctrine.
Whence does Professionalism got its knowl-
edge of CHRIST except from tho Bible 1t
rejects the authority and tradition of tho
Church rs the source of sucn knowledge,
falling ia K on the Scriptures alone. II has
no basis FORTS belicfand its theology except
tho Eiblc. 1t must go to the Bile Ton tho
The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1892-12-22
THE TAX ON DEATH.
A Lawyers View or the Collateral Inhcri-
Tax.

To THE EDITOR OF THE SrN--S ir. Il! You are
willing to grant space to another prot est
against the Collateral Inheritance Tax law 50
called. md think what follows OF any weight
shall he pleased to have you make what use
OF 1t you may deem best.
Although tho Court Of Appeals Of this state
passed upon the constituti ouality OF the origi-
nal act. and decided IN its favor tnlattct OF
Mcpherson. 104 y. V. 3O,i. there is no doubt
III my mind that 1t and its successors are con-
trary both to the letter and the apirit o, the
Constitution OF tho state OF New York. For.
while thoy violate the letter. to wit, OF the
twon'ieth section OF article 3. which reads ns
follows; Every law which imposes. continues,
or rtvives tax shall distinctly state the tax
and the object TO which II Is to 10 applied, and
1t shall not be sufficient to refer to any other
law to flN such tax or object" they uudoub,.
ediy also violate tho spirit u this PROVISION
10y determining u fixed ratio Of taxation b.
means OF which nn immense surplus might loo
p'ica or IN the Treasury due to no eNtgaordi.
nary demand. but merely to the force Of eN.
'rlhsic circumstances. Other taxes are grad.
u"'ed to the needs OF the State. or to those Of
the particular fund for tho benefit OF which it
Is imposed. whereas the amount OF this tax.
on the other hind. is determined solely by tho
ueath rats among the richer class OF the com.
MUMMY ana the disposition made b. law or by
viii OF tho estates left by the deceGents
Could anything DO moro monstrous in n FREQ
country than to levy an unnecessary tax,
while. II thore are pressing moods to 10 SIN.
piied from Year to year. could the LEGISLATURE
choose more uncertain method OF raising the
needful money! Perhaps it III becomes IN ms
an officer OF the court 10 critlcise the rulings
OF the highest tribunal Of the State. but it GER
tainy would appear that the Conrt of Appeals
must no OF tho opinion that the frumcrs OF the
constitution. when they made use Of and tn.
people OF the state. when they adopted the
language OF section - OF article ,. were
talking through their hats" IL may be bar.
doned tho quotation. Nor Is It WISE pcrhars.
TO question the wisdom Of the LEGISLATURE:
nevertheless. | cannot help thinking that that
body must 10 very i'll advised as to the effect
OF indiscriminate taxation.
have confined myself to the consideration
OF very general objections to the law hut 10
many OF the provisions OF the various acts and
amendments thereto. MS they are construed BY
inc courts. there are specific objections of
great weight: notably. for instance tie i'm
E!ense and intoierable responsibility which ty
some OF the sections is thrown upo IL the Shout.
ders OF eS ecutors.
WILLIAM BARD McVIcKAn
u WALL STREET. NEW YORK. Dec 20.
The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1892-12-22

facts Of the life OF JESUS on earth and to OBJ
tain His teachings. 1t derives thence the
scheme OF salvation which 1t breaches to
men as Divine truth. and which to
be Divine truth must have come by
inspiration from GOD. If, then. the
Bible is not infallible authority. Protcs-
tantism he's no authority except the
human reason; it Is not Church Of GOD
divinely founded. but party OF men
holding to a purely speculative religious
theory aud system. Moreover. what be.
comes OF "the CHRIST in the Book under
tho application OF tho BRIGGS methods OF
analysis accepted by our correspondent I?
Almost every book Of the New Testament
is the subject Of controversy as to its orr
gin. genuineness. or authority.
Those methods. therefore. strike at the
very foundation Of theology. and hence
they arc radically opposed to orthodox
Protestant doctrine in oil times Onr cor.
respondent misreprescnts the teachings Of
LUTHER and CALVIN. The whole Westmn-
ster Confession. article by article and
clause by clause. is fortified by Scriptural
quotations presented as the absolute au-
thority for its teachings.
"a ~. tApltSStu ~ III MS dI&u~
ment Tor the prosecution ON Tuesday. the
Presbyterian Church places faith above
mere scholarship" 1t holds that men must
have IN inspired and infalible author
ity TO tell them Of the problems
Uf life and death. iusoulle by the human
understanding. and that that uthorty is
the Bible alone. not merely 1.-THE CHRIST in
the Bible but the Bible itself; that JESUS
was not merely moral teacher but the
Son of COD. very COP OF very COP, utter
ing perfect and absolute truth. Otherwise
they are left in the dark. unless they turn
to the Church for authority. and that would
involve tho unconditional surrender OF
Professionalism.
This simple issue presented by the teach
ings OF Dr.. BRIGGS the jury of the Presbv-
terry Is entirely competent to decide, and 1t
is an issue OF momentons consequence to
Professionalism.
The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1892-12-22
The Mexican Million.

The House passed on Monday, under 4
suspension OF the rules and by vote of
1T2 to s. n bill adding 81 ,OSs ,s3a a year TO the
prescn; enormous pension expenditure Of
tho Cove 'nmcnt. The hill increases from
s. to SD II month tho pension paid 10 every
Mexican war veteran OF war widow "who
Is wholly disabled from manual labor. and
Is in such destitute circumstances that So
per month arc insufficient to provide the
neCessarics of life
This last qualification will amount to
nothing. Every Mexican war veteran or
widow now drawing eight dollars monthly
will hereafter draw twelve. This fact is
perfectly understood in the Pension Office,
which estimates the increased expenditure
under the new law at 81 .0SSs32 or just 81
month additional for every one of the 1j,3o5
veterans and 1856 widows now on the rolls
at So. 1t was understood in the House.
where the cost of the bill was stated as q
little over million a year
Democrats joined Republicans in rushing
through this clecmosvnary measure of
pension increase. The bill passed the Sell
ate at the last session. and now needs only
tho Presidents signature to fastcn upon
the Treasury the new charge.
The incident is not encouraging to those
who are looking to the Democrats of this
Congress and of the next Congress for
greater prudence and Il new sense of re-
sponsibillty in the matter OF pension lcgs-
lation. Tho argument for the Mexican in
crease Is neither better nor worse than tho
argument which could be offered tomorrow
for further increase in civil war pensions.
which would add not merely one million
but fifty or !. hundred millions. to the an
ntial pension "hlrge.
1t Is n bad beginning for pension reform;
and tension reform thric must be. barring
the alternative ~ national bankruptcy or
IN Increase II the national debt. The ONLY
IedeemnE feature Of this last piece OF cX.
traNAganc" Is found in the circumstance
that proposition TO go further than the
Senate went and TO grant tho increase
without regard to disability or dependence.
was Withdrawn after ii had been criticised
sharply by some Of the members who voted
for the bill In the form in which it passed
The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1892-12-22

To r,tp En,-o, o, ,.,, c ~. 80, .
~ mr. i'n' y" "f lhf o'H-->n: The edi-
torial article headed "Pcrnicious Scheme Of
Taxation struck mo ms excellent ltshn,l1
la ,o,Ioyal n,,,v IL =; 'o"'i
.' 'V.'o".u Wy y, o'"ers' ~ oraer TO prevent
the injustice that may DO imposed upon the
community by what is claorIv n ,,ayi,o 70 nv
thar ;nn;,.i,,, ",, .1t"''s "e'lce 10 !ur-
e' '"'iu"'i AN" oihcinl PURPOSES leg
leave TO present my case to you. not for publ
cation, but for YOUR information IN bouead :.
Won coo a. ,,,on ,h, ,,no'..,n'A ~ W u9'u 10
e' ~ "ien me rIoper 'ltne comes
MY uncle. A. y. c.. died in January. 1888 By
the terms OF his will no gave To his win on,ir,
;ntorest 1,rir,, ha,. i;;n t,.n o 80 en'n
u"''"s "er ne or WiIo"hood IN ercry-
thing he possessed. his nephews and nieces TO
he the bcnenciaries after her doath. / one
~ ito ,o,ha,,, 49,, ny, am VEG
VI ,us he'.cMs' una Tue onIY icEatee who is a
resident OF New York city. He appointed his
wife sole cyecutriy DURING bcr Iifo M r;dor
hood and ono OF his tr,ands anh M , ~, ~
executors after her Ienti, Shs rianriy - ma'
titled to the benefits OF his estefe Gu I'm. bnr
lie. and wo are the banelcinries ftnr ie er
Death "A'si Io1
The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1892-12-22

A. for Tnr SrN maling 'he South solid with the ro-cs
b.l issue, There is absolutely ih III u. The Lp,.
Ara "nhe took up that issue SON rs thu Republican
platform was ruu!ishrd. and krpt up n steady txut
upon H. eSos!E; is infamous features and It's danger
IL lie liberties OF the citizen. In other ciiuns of
tile Son'h. other Democratic papers were no
less Alert to the danger that lay IN Republican sue
cess The press NJ the South needed no coaching from
hr Dress OF 'hr North This subject Indeed ;he South
ern press insisted hat the Force bill
North. ana aner'-d the liberties OF that section mas
much placed contro OF on ctops
in The hands OF s!ngie party 1t the Soutl m
press that insisted fighting the battle OF 1882 OH III
two issues that the battle of 1870 Northern DEM
orras were AZ first inclined to think there nothing
in tue Force bissne bn before the campaign was over
every Northern orator from the most insignificant 10
the most eminent. waA hAmmering that measure,
The credit is due to Southern pres not to TUE Sun