San Antonio daily light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1886-1907, 1892-05-04
THE COURTS.
UNITED STATES COURT.

osncnez dc MelendeZ, charged Will
being an Illicit retail liquor dealer
was tried and found not guilty.
w. +. Weir, soldier who enlisted
two years ago, deserted, was convict
ed, and was discharged by Judg,
Msxey on the application of the father
OF the boy, as he was minor.
45rH DISTRICT COURT.
In this court the case of Vana VS.
Burgstatter, occupied the morning
session.
37TH DISTRICT COURT.
In this court this morning the fol.
lowing Judgments and dismissals
have been rendered
VIM. M. O'Brien, administrator, vs.
Frank Schelcher, promissory note, tor
plaintiff.
E. A. Gill vs.. E. Beckley, prommis.
sorry note, by Default.
Lockwood & Co., VS.. Dan Sullivan
& Co, damages, dismissed at plain.
tiff's cost.
Shsfer & Braden vs. The Port Aran-
sas company, on promissory note, for
plaintiffs.
D L. Newberg & Son vs.. Dalko-
WITT d Bro, on sworn account, at
plaintiffs cost.
Geo. II. Kalteyer vs.. Schwethelm
ct al. on ptomissory note ard to FORE
close lien, by default.
S P. Simpson & Co. We. r. Fl. Rus
sci, on promissory note, for plaintiff.
g. NJ Topliff vs.. James F. Topliff.
divorce, for plaintiff.
Iona Hopwood VS.. A. E. Hopvood.
divorce, for plaintiff.
Fred Hummert VS. VIM. Blair and
Elizabeth Sinuott, debt and TO fore
close lien, dis missed at defendants
cost, leave given to withdraw jury
fee
Ernestine Peters es al. VS.. Jacob
Rickert. trespass to try title, at
plaintiffs cost.
P. ii. McHsle VS.. Gus. Jennings, on
bill of exchange. by default.
Leopold We'll & Co., VS.. Samuels & |
Rosenman, account and note, by de- |
FAULT.
Il. G. Frost vs.. w. E. Wheeler, ct |
H., promissory note, at defendants
'ost.
Minnie Earnest We. J. w. Earnest,
livorce, for plaintiff.
Before Justice Adam this morning.
Handy Wilson was acquitted of the |
harge of using abusive language to |
}irilda Ramirez.
Sadie Ray was fined 5000 for keep.
ng a disorderly house. This was a
est case, submitted oy the entire lot |
4 disorderly house keepers to the
ourts TO determine IL they shall pay
license to the city and fines to the
tate also. City Attorney Bergstrom
preared for the city and nominally
Or the defense. He admitted the
barge but demurred as to defend.
nt's liability to the state, as she paid
city license, and asked that the
harge be dismissed. To this the
ounty attorney obj acted, it was sus-
aimed and verdict of guilty was en-
cred. An appeal was impGediately
AIKEN to Judge NOOnan's court, and if
necessary, will be submitted to the /
higher appeals court.
The city's defense will DO that the I
ity, under charter from the legisla.
sre, is authorized TO license bawds
nd that therefore the state has no
light to make legal occupation sub.
ect to criminal prosecution.
The states prosecution will be that |
he law against the social evil has not
,een repealed, and that is what Judge
Noonan, the grand jury and the offic-
RS are working under. Also that the
supreme court has held that the /
legislature can not divert o lower
court of Its jurisdiction in such or
similar cases.
There are rs indictments.
Francisco Gonzales was fined SIS for
lsing abusive language to Antonio |
Sosa.
Justice Heron fined Theo. Magot, |
IN East Commerce street saloon |
keeper, S. for assaultlng his enemy,
Henry Sherman, with whom he had
1me lawsuit, last night with beer
lass.
Gus Isascs was also fined S. for
and battery.
Justice Adam has q safe in his office
which is held as witness and at the |
same time Is for sale. 1t belongs
either to the Carey Safe company or
t. DIR, Clifford, and is the outcome of |
an old trial. The company sued and |
got Judgment against DIR. Clifford for |
the safe and the Doctor. appealed.
The safe was brought into court, will |
have to be hoisted up to Judge |
Noonan's court, and perhaps will
have to be shipped off to the supreme
C curt, If the CAGE is not settled before.