The Democratic advocate. [volume] (Westminster, Md.) 1865-1972, 1892-05-21
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.
NO. 1927 EQUITY.
Tn the Circuit Court for Carroll County
John p Raitt VS.. C. Hanson Raitt ct al.

Tn the Circuit Court for Carroll County.
John r. Ratt VS.. C. Hanson Raitt ct al
The object of the Petition of Mary Jane
Ro;tt Executrix of C. Hanson Raitt, late oil
Carroll county. Maryland, deceased: hled IN
This canse, is to obtain an order OF Court
snbrogating the petitioner, as the legal rep
resenfatiye of said C. Hanson Raltt to the
creditors of Nathan Raitt, late of Carroll
comfy. deceased, and requiring the trustees
in the above cause to pay over TO her, alter
deducting expenses and proper commissions;
the balance of the undistributed proceeds Oh
sale from the real estate.
Anr;I- 1855. a certain Nathan Raitt, died IN
Carroll county, Maryland, intestate and un,
married, seized of certain real estate IN sa,u
county: that said real estate was sofa Dy
r Hanson Raitt and G. W. Crapster, trus-
tees, appointed by decree OF the court, lor
Sc, 49,. so, and that the sum oil %, lo';oo vi
said sales were distributed among the heirs-
at.law of said Nathan, leaving the undlstriDu-
ted sum of 100000, in the hands OF the
trustee in the cause; that letters OF 1 aumln-
istration we're granted to the said Z: hanson
Raitt by the Orphans Court of Carroll
county, on the personal estate OF salu
Nathan, who qualified, and entered upon the
duties of administration thereof; tnat IN
the month of March, 1892, said Z. Hanson
Raitt, died in Carroll county, leaving will,
by which he devised and bequeathed all his
property to his wife, the petitioner, and ap-
pointed her executrix of said will that she
applied for and obtained from the Orphans
Court of Carroll county, letters testamentary
ON said will, and as such executrix settled on
the 18th day of April, 1892, the first and final
account of her husband, as administrator OF
said Nathan Raitt, from the books and papers
left by said deceased; that said settlement
shows balance due her husbands estate OF
Sl,lI4.85, after accounting and charging him
with the entire assets and personal estate OF
his decedent; the petition prays that the
said undistributed proceeds of said real estate
now in the hands of the trustees in the cause,
to-wit: 81, 02000, may be paid over to the
petitioner to make good in part, the balance
due the estate of her testator, from the estate
of said Nathan; that the heirs at-aw OF
said Nathan, at the time of the filing of
the Bill, were said c. Hanson Raitt,
brother; John I. Raitt, nephew; Henry
| C, Raitt, nephew; Charles II. Raitt,
nephew; Laura C. Raitt, neice; Elizabeth,
E. Eye, neice; Richard w. Simpson,
nephew: Thomas W. Simpson, a nephew;
Edward B. Simpson, a nephew; George X.
Simpson, a nephew; Sophia S. Crapster,
wife of said G. W. Crapster, and Lurenno A.
Aiken, neice; hat since said bill was
filed said C. Hanson Raitt has died as atore-
said, also said John Z. Raitr and Sophia S.
Crapster: that said John 7. left adult
daughter, Ella, married to Rev. -
Sherwood; that said Charles II. Raitt
Laura C. Raitt, Elizabeth E. Eye, George r.
Simpson, Lurenno A. Aiken and Ella Sher-
wood are non-residents, living beyond the
State of Maryland. That Henry C. Raitt is
living in Baltimore City; Richard W. Simp-
son and Thomas W. Simpson, in Frederick
county, and Edward B. Simpson and Gusta-
vus W. Crapster are living in Carroll county,
Maryland.
1t is thereupon adiudged and ordered by
the Circuit Court of Carroll county, in Equity,
this 10th day of May, in the year eighteen
hundred and ninety-two, that the petitioner,
by causing copy of this order to be inserted
in some newspaper published in Carroll
county, Maryland, once in each of four sue
cessive weeks before the 10Th day of June,
next, give notice to the said Charles ii.
Raitt, Laura C. Raitt, Elizabeth +. Eye,
George r. Simpson, Lurenno A. Aiken and
Ella Sherwood who are non-residents of the
State of Maryland, absent defendants, of the
object and substance of said petition, and
warn them to appear in this Court in person,
or by Solicitor, on or before the 9th day oil
July, 1892, to answer said petition and show
cause, if any they have, why u decree ought
not to pass as prayed.
CHARLES B. ROBERTS,
True Copy,-Test:
my21 st BENZ. f. GROUSE, Clerk.