The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1892-02-07

this case Between and on the morning
of June 5, Officer Pool notified me of the
murder, and | went down to where the
body was lying. l made an examination
and found that the seat of the buggy in
which Callihan was riding had blood on it,
and the side was smeared with blood. On
examining the body | found the wounds
upon it described by DR.. Ewing. A bullet
was protruding from the wound in the back
and | took it out.
Mr., Murphy-Have you that bullet!
The Witness-I have.
Mr.. Young here produced the bullet
which caused Callihan's death, and it was
examined curiously by the attorneys and
then returned to the witness with instruc
lions to ascertain its calibre.
Continuing, Mr.. Young testified that
after her arrest, Josie Hill told him that
she had been to the road house with CALI
han, and after getting q few drinks, they
entered the buggy and started for home.
They had gone but a short distance when a
short man jumped up to the buggy and
| grappled with Callihan. Then she heard a
voice say "Drive on, JOSEF 1 asked her
why she didn't drive back to the road
house, where she had left three or four
men, and she answered that she didn't
| know. Her first impulse was to get up
! town and find an officer.
! "Where was Coyote Dick working al
that time!"
"At saloon on Franklin avenue"
ibid he know Josie Hill and Lottle
Miner9"
~ had seen him talking to them''
Had you ever seen this horse and buggy
before the killing?"
Eyes, 1 saw it at about 1 O'Clock that
same morning. l saw it cross State roaC
on Third South and go east"
ibid you see Louise Mellow that night2'
to T ~,
and on the night in question, l saw hel
come out Of the house and enter Cal. Bean!
hack Mrs. Miner was standing in the
door at this ti1ne.''
''Did you know Sid Larkin at that time q
He told me himself the morning after
wards that he was working in the gamb
ling hall over the Gsiety."
"Was he acquainted with Callihan.n
81 do not know
! 'sDid you have conversation with Lot
tie Miner on the morning of June 9Th witt
reference to this occurrence
Eyes. l saw her at her house"
DISPUTE ABOUT ADJOURNMENT.
! AS it was now adjourning time, Attor
ney Armstrong arose and said:
, Now gentlemen, Monday will be election
day, and don't suppose we will be able L
do anything then. l will ask when it will
be convenient for the attorneys to resum
t Une nearing
Mr.. Murphy-Well l shall be engaged
the county court on Tuesday, but can b
3 here Wednesday.
Mr.. Armstrong-We object to that, a
3 these defendants are compelled to renal
in the penitentiary and have already bee
8 there for thirteen days. We will not COZ
: sent to the hearing being continued TO sui
the attorneys. We insist that the hearin
3 be resumed on Monday, as that is not
holiday This prosecution is evideutl
playing for time, and | don't believe tn
attorneys know what they are asking FOL
1t is simply an outrage on these defenC
: ants.
Mr.. Murphy replied that he woul
{ consent to the nearing being re
b sumed on Tuesday as Mr.. Eichno
would attend to it. 1t was u
I usual to proceed with cases here Q
election day; as to the intimations that tt
attorneys were actuated by any mouH
other than to sift this matter TO the DO
:, tom, they were false. That was all he ba
u to say of the matter.
t The commissioner announced that II
n hearing would be resumed on Iuesds
3 morning, and the court then adjourned.