The record-union. [volume] (Sacramento, Calif.) 1891-1903, 1892-03-30
SUPREME COURT CALENDAR.
May Term at sacramento.

May Term at Sacramento.
MONDAY, May I'd.
Court meets at 2 P. N. in bank. Motions
and examination of class of applicants.
IN BANK.
TUESDAY May 3D.
Motions and examination of class con
tinued.
WEDNESDAY, May 4th.
IN BANK.
l3,017-Diefendorf VS.. Hopkins.
I3,9i5-Goldberg vs.. Thompson.
l4.21 4-Brickel Us. Henry
ing Company.
2o,912-People vs. All Lee Doom.
14,43o-Ward VS.. Marshall
THURSDAY, May 9Th.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
0,917-People VS.. French.
2O,J1S-People VS.. O'Brien
2O,919-People VS.. Wons Ark
2C,S97-People VS.. Fallon
I,116-Clarkson VS., Hoyt
3,S93-Bohnert VS.. Bohnert
14,12S-Rameill VS.. Irish
III ,o26-Shipler VS.. Green ct al
DEPARTMENT TWO.
14.721-Mofitt VS. Buison.
i,26S-Hulsnan VS.. TODD ct al.
I4,IO2-Selilck VS.. De Carlow et al.
ct al " Ivy te
"A s95-Lorenz ct al. VS.. Waldron.
~ 20,905-People VS.. DoIan
2O,9O9-People VS.. Manning.
FRIDAY, May 9th.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
IA ,474-Guidery administration VS.. Green.
14.a6l-Reading S. Reading.
1863 Erlanger vs.. Danielson ct al.
H. Oy-Slight VS.. Patton ct al.
14,S1O-Moore VS.. Schofield ct al.
14,SS4-Eeln VS.. ProSeus
DEPARTMENT TWO.
I4,639-Austin VS.. Gagan, ST., ct al.
Io,O23-E5tate OF Westertield vs. Smith.
"a ,68S-Mahoney VS.. Bostwiclz.
14,I92-BrUSie VS.. Gates eft al
11,910-Bury VS.. Young ct AL
14,6O1-Pe1chy VS.. Feacny
4,o|I-Merced Bank Us. Rosenthal ct al.
MONDAY, May 9th.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
II ,6S4-Green VS.. the County of Fresno.
IL 13-Church vs. Shanzlin
14,I32-Switzer vs. Baker.
44,L41-treeman VS.. Hensev
i4'a4o-Bradford VS.. Parkhurst.
l4,Io3-Barrett VS.. Austin
Ii, observation-disclosures VS. the Sou+barp In
surance Company. 49,
DEPARTMENT TWO.
14,776-Beall vs. Fisher.
4'a1a-Eihcher vs.; Malcomson
I,S32-Wlsh vs. Eramlet.
risation Company. ~ -
14,691-Clark ct al. VS.. Austin ct al
14,91o-Maze VS.. Hamilton.
TUESDAY, May 10th.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
14,736-Garber vs. GianeIIa
14,756-Millan vs. Hood
Il, SO1-Abram VS.. stuart ct nj
14,SOS-DiXOn VS.. Schermeier
I!,l o2-Stinchfeld VS.. ellis ct al
-" hlttaKer VS.. County Of Tuolumne.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
d4,4oI-odd Fellows Savings Bank VS..
II ,725-Reclamation District No. 1a4 VS.
Gray. w.
1s,o2S-Estate of johnson.
14.445-StoclzIon Savings and Ioa,, Societ,,
vs.. GiGdingS ct al O'0i0'S
TRAITOR. Is
=, ,72a-County of San Joaquin VS.. Budd ct
14,737-Doyle VS.. Without.
WEDNESDAY. May 11th
DEPARTMENT ONE.
4,6S5-StocHton Combined Harvester and
Agricultural Works VS.. Glenn Falls, Insur
ance Company.
,6S6-Stockton Combined Harvester ard
Agricultural works VS.. Hartford Fire Insur-
ance Company.
4,6S7-stockton Combined Harvester and
agricultural Works VS., Hamburg Mutuai
Fire Insurance Company
14,6S8-Stockton Combined Harvester and
Agficult lral Works VS.. American Fire Insur-
ancc Company.
14,739-Loclle VS.. Moulton ct al
14,7oo-White CT al. VS.. Fresno National
Bank. ~
DEPARTMENT TWO.
ii, 746-Webeg administrator VS.. GIL
14,147-Green VS.. Thornton
IA, 152-GLty OF Stockton vs.. Weber ct al.
y, Sl-G lndeIs vs.. Sperry Ell al.
622-Danieis VS.. Church.
Ii, S59-Johnson VS.. Nfsher.
Thu RsDAY, May 18th.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
Il, 672-Johnson VS.. Sweeney.
II, S3o-Corcoran (by GUARDIAN VS.. Citv of
Benicia. '' VI
II, S5z-Gwin VS.. Sweetser ct al.
1i,S2I-Bank of olo VS.. Weaver ct al
1l,S74-Prior VS. Digs,
II. 59-Burr VS.. Board of Supervisors OF
14,16o-Baynev VS.. Ryan, District Attorney.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
4,624-Natoma Water and Mining Com.
pany IS. Hancock ct al
,941I,Natoma Water and Mining Com
pany Us. Hancock ct al.
4,1IS-Warnock VS. Harlow.
14,61l-Irean, Jr., VS.. Cogan.
14,o2o-kreuzberger VS.. Ningfeld.
14,SG3-Jones VS.. Duner.