New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1892-04-19
PART II.
PAGES To14.

offer to prove that numerous averments Of fact
the Court OF Appeals which letter you have admitted
in evidence, are totally false =,
Mr. sutherland on December 5 did not come to Judge
Maynard with the novelty OF new suggestion, but
had been first I o. December 2 and haa be s
results of the proceedings before Judges Barnard and
Edwards and that their decisions having been rem.
ready enter into the stipulation which three days
We offer to prove that this stipulation did not EN-.
brace all matters in controversy on the date IL was
signed but that the proceeding Instituted itOt ,h by Daley
lion was made 10 secure the corrected return RON
Duchess County, omitted from the provisions OF
We Offer TO prove that Judge Maynard knew this,
and that one Of the arguments adGnsed by Mr ~:
hearing before Judge Edwards for permanent !, nan man
Ss@s to wa stay he the Si f had a then 8 by
telegram from Poughkeepsie that Judge Barnard had
granted the application TO Daley and Platt.
wILFUL FAL:EHOOD on THE PART OF MAYNARD.
We offer to prove, In short that the Interpretation
placed by Judge Maynard, in his letter now In evil
dence upon the terms and effects OF that stipulation
u.s. in facf, false Interpretation, and in the nature OF
things, must by him be known 10 he false.
We offer to prove by the Hon. George F. IDgraham,
justice of the supreme Court Of the state Of Newfork,
that the order OF December 81 staying the forwarding
Of the corrected return, was not granted until $50
p. m. OF that day.
40 O'Clock p. m. OF December 81 he cons antly
In the company Of Storm Emans, until Emans deposited
the corrected return In the postofce and that, during
that time, Emans had no interview with James W.
lIlnckley.
We offer to prove by several witnesses whom we
will IL permitted to subpoena them, that, after
the election and before the adoption OF the Mylod re-
turns by the Board OF County Canvassers Of Dntchess
County, Isaac H. Maynard was frequently at POUCH
kecpsie In conference with members Of that board ell
deavorlng 70 induce them 10 create that Illegal ena
erroneous return, and to perform numerous acts OF
fraudulent character.
Ne respectfully request that Mr.. Maynard be
formally requested TO appear before this committee
and testify rs TO his acts in the under in
vestgation, and that he subject himself 10 such ex-
animation members OF the committee may consider
essary for the entertainment OF the true facts and
all Of them. far there Is anything in the nature
OF evidence before this committee as the has been
left by counsel II consists wholly OF the printed
record furnished By the Association OF the Bar OF
New York, and the statements OF storm Emans: 1t
must be evident lou and TO every member OF the
majority that investigation which excludes the
testimony of reputable per,ons who are prepared 70
formal letter Of defence are In direct conflict with tbs
truth will be investigation at all, but instead, an
unrghcOls effort 10 suppress The facts ~ deceive tho
public ard TO screen The accused Official.
Judge Maynard has complained heretofore OF lbs
having been denied the opportunity of an examine
ton lie that in tne proceedings before Judge
cullen to punish Eman, for contempt OF court, he was
mot Permitted to testify While We do not think
are wholly at variance with it, we do intend that
1t shall be fault il Judge Maynard is compel ed 70
wait another day for the examination he processes
10 desire We Insist that he be brought before the
committee, and insist that the pledges made to us
by the hon"rable chairman and oy senato: Cantor
shall be redeemed and that the vote Of the committee,
which cannot interpret otherwise than effort
to shut ont facts known to be damaeing to the case
Of jude Mayns ,s sha be r reG9naea We arc
WIN s'''' '''p'''' EDMTND o'CoNNoR.
CHARLES T. sAXTON,
JOSEPH MCLLlN.
Albany, April 1o. 1892