The morning call. [volume] (San Francisco [Calif.]) 1878-1895, 1892-02-06

says he left note making An appointment
TO meet Brown at 10 o'clock the following
morning which was Sunday. Mr.. Brown
was there, and Evatt told him the story
word for word as it was told to him in
the presence of witness that was there-a
gentleman he would very readily point out,
but lie had forgotten his name. During all
OF the conversation, Evatt never once men
toned money, as he thought 1t would be
very cheeky proposition. Mr.. Brown asked
Evatt. Where Is this man?" aud Eyatt told
him he had promised not to tell. Mr.. Brown
never mentioned money to Evatt on that
day or any other of the days during the
conversations, which were very often, nor
did Evatt ever mention money to him.
Eyatt told Arey repeatedly throughout the
week that it was foolish for him 70 think
that men we're going TO make any kind OF
an offer TO Eyatt, and that lie had better see
them himself aud settle his own business.
SAW THE LAWYERS.
at last MIR. Brown asked Evatt If he
would see the lawyers and tell them the
story as it was told 10 him, and afiiant an
swered, Certainly l will" Evatt then
went to Henley and Swifts offices, end
Evatt told them exactly the same thing ne
had told Mr.. Brown. But he did not tell
them at this first interview Arey's name.
They asked him if he believed that his in
f0rmants statement was true. They were
very careful in asking him what motives
his informant had for keeping back his
name and why he had not told this to some
body before. lie told them that his inform
ant, meaning Arey. was very reluctant to be
mixed up in the case, and was afraid that IL
he said ANYTHING about it he would lose
his place. as he was doing certain work for
certain people, and IL would interfere with
him if be made any statement They (Hen-
lev and SwifO, together and individually,
asked Evatt if it seemed TO him If the man
was speaking the truth, and he told them
d" 1es y; that AIey impressed him very
them Arey'S address, and Messrs Henley
and Swift as he understood, went 10 his
house but did not find him.
REPEATED THE STORY.
Evatt also swearS that he told Charles A.
Jones' whose affidavit has been filed IN TINS
case. the same story as above narrated, ana
il atliant Jones undertakes to leave the I'M
preston that Mr.. Brown was 10 give him
any money his affidavit is absolutely false
in this particular. His affidavit is also false
in regard to his saying to him that Arey
told him that he heard the shot. In TACT
Arey told EYatt that he did not hear the
shot. but that 1t might have occurred when
he closed his gate, as it closed with slam,
or after he had got on the inside OF his
house.
Tie affidavit Of Jay Robbie Bradstreet,
who said he was an American of seven gen
eratiOns Of Americans, none OF whom had
ever been convicted of any crime, was to
the effect that he was one Of the men who
were earliest on the scene on the night OF
the jacobson murder 1t was mostly about
what the utliant had heard about the
tragedy.
An affidavit by Sidney Bell was read,
which contained a denial Of the matters
alleged by Captain Lees against him at
their first interview.
There was also au affidavit by his brother,
F. K. Bell, denying the truth OF Rosie
CampbelPs statement on the occasion Of
Detective Browns visit to her.
CAMPBELL SWORE FALSELY.
Martin Kelly's affidavit was 10 the effect
that Campbell told him in the City Prison
that lie had sworn falsely against Bell, and
Dr. E3stOu'S affidavit related 10 the manner
in which kelly's affidavit was procured in
tie House Of Correction.
The Clemens affidavit was an attack on
Stilwell, who, he said. while in the employ
Of Captain Lees as a detective, had falsely
represented himself 10 be an Examiner re-
porter. Mr.. Clemens mat e Seconds atfi-
dsyit in which he denied that he had used
tie language TO Stlllwell rejecting Oh Judge
Murphy.
The other aflidavits cOntradctei SchOn-
chin MaIoney's affidavit as to the converse
ton at the Piedmont Baths between
Clements, Grifliths and MalOney On tie
Bell case.
Al this stage the court adjourned until 10
o'clock this morning.
SCHWARTZ RETURNS.
The return 10 this city Of Joseph
Schwartz the man who Campbell charged
under the name OF Harry Schwartz, IN one
of his gfiiayts with being the slayer Of
jacobson, constituted a separate sensation
IN this notable case yesterday. 1t was
given Out that the prosecution intend TO
produce Schwartz on the witnesS-stand
20 tell all lie knows about the case, which
himself says amounts 10 moth
ing excepting that lie kept company at
one time with Miss Ida kIrchner who dis
carded him for Jacobson in whose company
she visited the TiyoIi the night he was
shot.
In his testimony during the present pro-
Ceedlngs Campbell sw0Te that the portion
Of his statement IN the Chicago affidavit re-
lating to Schwartz was furnished by Detsc-
tive Brown 10 him. CdmpbelPs testimony
Oh this point Brown pr0nOunces to be will
ful and malicious lie
The proceedings In The Clemens contempt
case Will be the first business considered by
Judge Murphy this morning after going
through tina regular criminal docket.
TIM, THE SLASHRR.