New Ulm review. (New Ulm, Brown County, Minn.) 1892-1961, 1892-10-12
THEY WANT PROTECTION.
Brief Reasons From the Nations Greatest
Statesmen N Defense Of the Doctrine
which they Held.
Jefferson, Hamilton, Webster, Clay, Lin
coin and Blaine all were Protection
ISIS

I am in favor Of ahigh protective tar.
i if Abraham Lincoln.
The cause Of protection is the cause of
the. country. Henry Clay.
Patriotism will certainly require the
continuance of the tariff tariff Thomas JEFF
| ferson.
We have prospered most when our in
dustries have been best protected. ~ ohm
Sherman
| The Republican Party is the friend and
protector of the American holnc.-Ben-
| janin Harrison.
Agriculture, commerce and manufae-
lures will prosper together or languish
| together Daniel Webster.
! We legislate for the people Of the
United States and not for the whole
sworld.- James a. Garfield.
Protection makes factories, and factor
i S make inventions and inventions make
IN extensive domestic market for the
SURPLUS produce Of the soil is of the
frstsconsequence. Alexander Hamilton.
The benefits of protection go first and
last To the men who earn their bread in
the sweat Of their faces.James G..
Blaine.
/ favor encouragement to home pro-
ducts, employment to labor at living
wages am the development of home re-
sources. Ulysess S. Grant,
We lead al nations IN agriculture, min
inc and manufacturing. These are the
trophies which we bring after twenty
nine years of a protective tariff.-Wm.
Mckinley Jr.
Every manufacture encouraged in our
own country makes home market and
saves so much money to the country that
must otherwise be exported 1t seems
therefore, to the interest OF all OF our
farmers and owners OF land to
encourage manufacturers IN prefer
ence to foreign ones imp from DIS
tant countries. Benjamin franklin.
It is my opinion that "a careful and Ju-
dicious tariff is much wanted to pay our
national debt and afford us the means OF
that defense within ourselves on which
j..
the safety and liberty of our country de-
pend; and last, though not least, give
proper distribution to our labor which
must prove beneficial to the happiness,
independence and wealth of the commun-
| ity.-Andrew jackson.
If wares or fabrics can be produced on
one side of piece Of water by labor cost
ing but cents per hour, and no barrier
is interposed to the importation and sale
of those fabrics on the other side of that
water it is just morally impossible they
shall continue to be made on this side
while labor no more efficient costs here
| 10 cents or over per hour. And if by
cheap labor in Europe and low Cor no)
duties on our coast, our clothes, metals,
wares, silks, watches ETC., are mainly i'm
ported, it is just impossible to keep up
the prices of labor here, even in the pur-
suits still left to us. For under such cir
cumstances our manufactures and arts
must die out, our imports overbalance
our exports and our prices of land, labor
and products decline to point at which
large quantities of the staples we are
still enabled to produce may be profit
ably exported. He who tells you he is
in favor of high wages and low duties is
either knave or a Ounce. He might as
nationally pretend to be in favor of hay
ing the farmers get a dollar a bushel for.
their corn and the artisan at the same
inc be amply supplied with corn meal
at half a dollar bushel.- Horace Gree
ly.