Omaha daily bee., 1892-12-18


To the owners OF the lots parts OF lots and
real estate abuttlng on or adjacent to the
streets, alleys or avenues herein named or
situated in whole or In part within any of
the districts herein sDecihcd:
You and each OF you are hereby notified
that the city council of the city of Omaha will
the city clerk, In the city hall, Omaha, Ne.
braska on FRIDAY, the - day Of December,
1892, from o'clock u. IN. to O'Clock p. m, for
the purpose OF considering and equaiizing the
proposed levy OF specialtaNCs and assessments
us shown by Proposed Plans OF Assessment"
now on tle In the office OF said city clerk ana
correcting any errors therein. and of hearing
all complaints that the owners OF property SO
to be assessed and taxed may make; said
special taxes and assessments proposed TO be
levied being necessary to cover the cost of the
several improvements duly authorized to be
made and now completed, us follows;
Cass street. from 22d street to oath street, In
street Improvement district No. 430, sa d paw
ing amounting to the sum of a. s3s. 50, and said
curbing to the sum of SJ6ii6. which tld sums,
y is proposed. py report duly adopted by
eucn side of Cass street from 2!d to 24th
street, according to foot frontage ana the us
ual scaling back process in depth to alley; no
assessment for curbing to be made west of 23d
street as the curb there was laid by private
rate per foot for curblng sO.633!6
To cover the cost OF paving Lowe avenue,
from Hamilton street to Mercer avenue, In
paving dist rict No. 2'6. amounting to the sum
of So, r,s5l52, which said sum,it is proposed, by II
report duly adopted by the city council, to
avenue from Hamilton street to Mercer av-
enue, according to foot frontage and the
OF Se or sp Tts P d
The cost of private approach Amounting to
the sum " df SSs5l, to he assessed to the real
estate adjoining.
To cover the cost of paving Commercial
street from sherman avenue TO- 10Th street IN
proposed, by II report duly adopted by the
city council toassess pro rata on the real es-
tate on each side of Commercial street. from
sherman avenue to goth street, according to
foot frontage and the usual scaling back pro-
cess in depth fr9m 70 street 2 feet, not & exceed
shall be deducted on the frontage of tax lot
"a, east Of Commercial street. Rate per foot.
S3,4067. The cost of private roadway. amount
ing to the sum of S+).0l, to be assessed to the
real estate adjoining.
To cover the cost of paving and curblng 92nd
street from Popplcton avenue to the south
line of tax lot 80 in street Improvement dis
trict No. ~! amounting to the sum OF s.. 1850.
which said sum 1t is proposed by areport duly
adopted by the city council to assess on the
real estate pro rata, on each side of 92nd
street from PopDeton avenue to south line of
tax lot j6. according to foot frontage and the
usual scaling back process IN depth from
of private roadway, amounting to the sum of
SiO2.i0 to be assessed to the real estate adJoin-
ing ..-.-,
Spencer street from sherman avenue to 24th
street in street Improvement district No. 4?6,
sum 1t is proposed by report duly adopted
by the city council. to assess pro rata on the
real estate on both sides of Spencer street
from Sherman avenue to 94th street. accord
lny to foot frontage and the usual scaling
bsoi process in depth to the first alley or l3?
feet. Rate per foot. S4.2675S
To cover the cost of paving and curbing 9th
street from Pierce street to Hickory street
in street Improvement district No, 423
amounting to the sum of Sl5.0l3. G7, which said
sum it is proposed by report duly adopted
by the city council, to assess IS follows: The
cost of private roadway, amounting to the
sum of Sl31S2, to be assessed on tax lot No
:. The remaining cost to be assessed pro rata
on the property on both sid IS of 9th street
from Pierce street to Hickory street, accord
ing to the foot frontage and the usual
trict as created. That part of tax lot 3
assessed for curbing as the owner put this
curb In ut his own expense. Rate per foot for
paving Si27I01; for curbing sl.7i522
To cover the cost OF paving in alley In block
49, city, in street in nprovement district No 461.
amounting tho sum of Sl,IO4. a. which said
sum it is proposed by n report duly adopted
by the city council to assess pro rata on both
sides of the alley in block l3, according to foot
frontage and the usual scaling back process
to the depth OF one lot. Rate per foot. S2.5?54
To cover the cost ana inspection for laying
permanent side walks laid bv Ford & husc
| amounting to the SUM Of s., S62 0j. which said
| sum it Is proposed by a report duly adopted
| by the city council to assess on the real estate
along which said walks are laid. as follows:
| n 26l3 IT lot 5 blk 10 City 80 s.
| As lot 5 blk 10 81 as
| Lot blk 10 III 9:
| I r. lNl