The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1892-10-28
ORDER PUBLICATION.

Emma J. Ruth In the Circuit Court
John A. Ruth and others In Equity.
THE OBJECT of this bill is to- obtain de-
Il cree for sale of certain real estate situated
in Hartford County, and described therein and
distribution of the proceeds among the parties
70 this spit, according ding to the terms Of Eliza
payment of a mortgage debt now held by Mrs.
Lucy +. Moore. The bill alleges that Mrs. Eliza
beth Ruth. late of Hartford county, died in the
month of January, 1890, seized of 65A acres
of land, situated in said county, on the public
road leading from Churchville to Darlington,
adjoining the lands OF james Lee George
called '"Out Quarter" and Good Neghbor-
hood" and leaving a last will and testament,
whereby she devised said real estate to her
three daughters, Emma j. Ruth, Martha Ann
Ruth and Sarah Rosena Ruth, that said Sarah
Rosena died sometime in December, 1888, prior
to the death of her mother, unmarried and in
testate, leaving as her only heirs at law her
sisters and brothers, viz: Emma j. Ruth, Mar
tina Ann Ruth, VIM. E. Ruth and Charles w.
John A. Ruth, of the State of Dakota, and
James Henry Ruth, of the State of California,
both of last named being non-residents of the
State of Maryland. That the said above named
parties are each entitled to and seized of an I'M
divided interest or share in said real estate as
follows: Emma ]. Ruth to seven eighteenths,
Martha Ann Ruth to seven eighteenths there
of and John A. Ruth, VIM. E. Ruth, Charles
w. Ruth and James Henry Ruth are each en-
Titled 10 one unQlVlQeQ elKnbeenUn part or
share thereof. That said real estate is not sus-
ceptible of partition among those entitled to
same without great loss and injury. and that
they are unable to agree either upon parti-
ton thereof or u sale for division of the pro-
ceeds Also that there is upon the land records
unreleased a mortgage upon said land with
other land of 81, 100, executed by said Eliza
beth Ruth and her husband, and VIM. E. Ruth
to 4. Preston Gilbert, and by him assigned to
Mary L. Pannell, but it is charged that same is
paid. By subsequent petition it is shown that
said Mary L. Pannell is now deceased and that
said mortgage is now owned by certain Mrs.
Lucy r. Moore, of Baltimore city, who by
order OF Court Is made party defendant to
this bill. The bill then prayes that a decree
may be passed for a sale for partition of the
said above described lands and premises of
654 acres more or less, and for subpoenas
against the above named resident defendants
and for an order of publication against the
who are non-residents of the tate of Maryland,
warning thtm to appear and answer the allie
cations of this bill of complaint, &c.
Whereup0n it is this 9Th day of October, 1892,
ordered, that the complainant by causing a
copy of this order to be inserted in some news
paper published in Hartford county, once in
each of four successive weeks, before the 9TH
day of November, 1892, give notice to the
said nonresident defendants, John A. Ruth
and James Henry Ruth. of the object and SUBJ
stance of this BILL warning them to appear in
this Court in person or by solicitor, on or be-
fore the twenty-third day of November next,
to show cause, if any they have, why decree
ought not be passed as prayed.
WM. s. FORWOOD, JR., Clerk.
7oet oop'' WI NORWOOD In CLARK