San Antonio daily light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1886-1907, 1892-10-07
THE COURTS.
Suits Filed-New Citizens and Court
PROCEEDINGS

Proceedings.
Yesterday the Traders National bank
filed suit in the Thirty seventh district
court against James X. Raymond Il Co.,
of Austin, for garniShment; also against
Sam Allen for punishment.
Final citizenship papers were granted
yesterday to Mack Lindl, subject of the
Emperor of Germany; Charles Meyer,
subject of the Emperor of Germany.
The following cases were disposed of
by Judge King in the Forty-tifth district
court yesterday afternoon.
Charles DreSch against David Burns,
appeal from justice court; continued by
plaintiff.
The Weisel & Vilter Manufacturing
Co., against Sam Maverick and X. HouS-
ton, debt; set for October 30.
J. E. Calhoun against f. w. Perry and
others, appeal from justice court; judg-
ment for plaintiff against E. Terry, but
Judgment for defendant against Agnes
Terry.
j. X. Dunbar against Commercial Union
Assurance Co., of London, damages; con-
tinued under operation of the law.
Vanhorne, Griffin * Co., against Ii. Ii.
Hunt, appeal from justice court; con-
tinued for service.
Cynthia G. Collins against Thomas
Henry Collins, divorce; continued.
Alex MAR against Alex WurZbach and
others. on promiSSory note and foreclos-
ure of lien; leave given defendants Wurz-
bach and Wagenfuhr to file amended an
swer. Judgment for plaintiffs.
Rosana c. Ruitz and others against
Chas. A. r. Campbell and others, parti-
ton; set for November IA.
Antonio Seguin against Vicente SoSa,
trespaSS to try title for damages; con-
tinued for service.
w. l.. Bryan against j. +. Camp on
note and foreclosure Of chaJtel mortgage:
set for October II.
Van Horne. Griffin & Co. against H. H
Hunt, appeal frem justice court; con-
tinued for service.
The following cases were disposed of in
the Thirty seventh district court yester-
day afternoon:
w G. Cook against Sarah f. Ostrom
appeal from justice court; continued by
consent
Louisa Sein and others against the In
ternational & Great Northern, damages;
leave to file first amended original petit
ton.
Sallie Neff and others against the In
ternational & Great Northern, damages;
leave to file first amended original petit
ton.
Willie Dierken against John F. Dierkep,
divorce; continued by consent.
&. w. w. Smith against Sarah f.
OStrom, appeal from justice court; con-
tinued.
L. f. Brady against the San Antonio &
Texas Land company, debt; plaintiff
leave to file first supplemental petition.
A. Lowry against I. o. McGhee, debt
and seQueStratiOn; defendant granted
leave to file first amended original an
swer.
Max MeuSebach & Co. against 7. II.
Mickleiohn, debt: set for first jury case.
J. G.. Brown against j. T.. Tom and
others, on prOmisSory note; set for Octo-
Der Is.
Woodward StiIlman against Lassner &
Koehler, debt; continued for service.
James Brown and others against w. L.
Moore, Jr., treSpaSS to try title; judgment
of partition.
Henry Krempkau and others against L.
p. Mccall and others, partitions; Mccall
discharged as commissioner and w. d.
bruce was appointed in his stead.
S. Mayer against John f. Camp, debt;
continued by consent.
Francisco Rubiola and others against
Louisa Payen RubiOla and others, to try
title and for damages: continued to jury
docket.
This morning in the Thirty seventh
district court final papers We're granted in
the following cases: Carl Richter, sub
iect of the king of SaXOny, Frank Walther
and VIM. Muth, witnesses; j. b. WeltenS,
subject of the king of Belgium, j. j.
POeSmann and Anton Adam, witnesses;
Adam Fischer. subject of the king of
Germany, witnesses VIM. Muth and w.
NJ. Locke: Adam Mack, subject of the
emperor of Germany, g. L. Sullivan and
Wade Hampton, witnesses: JacObus
Buyck, subject of the king of Belgium, J.
j. POeSman and Fred Dickman, witnesses.
Judgment for defendant was rendered
- III Fn~ RI
Richter, to try title and for damages, in
the Thirty seventh district court.
This morning In the FOrty-hfth district
court judgment by default was rendered
in the following cases: GOldfrank, Frank
& Co., VS.. A. NJ. Jackson ct al, prOmiSSO-
ry note.
d. & A. Oppenheimer VS.. John Law
renee ct al, on prOmiSSory note and to
forecloSe lien.
Whitall, Tatum & Co. VS., Oscar Sam
ostz, debt.
Henry Mayer VS.. Samues & Roseman,
on sworn account.
d. & A. Oppenheimer VS.. Joseph Welt
mann, on promisSory note:
David Marx VS.. SamuelS Il RoSeman,
debt,
Judgment for plaintiff was delivered in
the following cases:
E. Dttmar VS.. NJ. E. Lubbock ct al. VS..
A. J. Barnett & Bro, on promiSSory note
Elmendorff & Co. VS.. J. e. Marshall and
John c. Monier, on prOmissOry note.
VIM. 7. Tiers e Co. VS.. b. KioIbassa,
debt.
In the case of A. c. Chapman VS. Lizzie
Chapman, divorce, judgment was rem
dered for defendant.
The following cases were dismissed:
J. G. Adler VS. S. p and q. II. & ). A.
railway companies, damages, at plaintih's
cost.
S. w. johnson VS.. LawiSton White, APP
peal from justice court, for want OF pros
ecution.
Final papers were granted II. G. Mitch.
ell, subject of the United Kingdom of
Great Britain and Ireland; John r.
Shook and w. NJ. Locke, witnesses.
SULPHUR BATHS.