The Jasper weekly courier. [volume] (Jasper, Ind.) 1858-1922, 1892-02-26

CATION here IL 10 succeed when an
other had failed. we're proof ~ disIoy-
sliy. then we would siusvs be seek
ing defesfed ip-fesl OF successful men
a. nominate Ii II i admitted then
that Mr. Hills <uccess j. not proof Of
di-iu, sIify. we are in : position %
seek other causes and they are sbun-
d2nt- Fir-s. the slienstion Of the en-
lire democratic portion Of the soldier
vote from Cleselsnd on account Of ve-
foes aD1 offes 10 restore confederate
fsgs second the alienation OF what IL
called The Beer and Liquor vote from
Warner Miller on account Of HE position
on the license question Mr.. Miller
started HE campaign against Hill BY IN
attempt 20 capture the prohibition vote
OF ttis state. and 10 that attempt be IN
geref that portion Of the republican
party which fsvored liberal excise laws
MANY OF them voted against Miller but
stuck 10 Harrison Thousands Of the
votes which Harrison got and Miller
failed 70 get can fairly be accounted for
this wsy Wss Gov. Hill 10 blame for
that? On The contrary was i not per-
fecfIy legitimate for Hills friends 20 get
fhe<e votes for him even IL they failed 10
gel them for CI~veIspdS think il Vas.
Third. Mr. CIeveIands afiIi4rion with
mugwnmps and haters OF democracy
naturally created The impression that il
democrat would find favor with his
administration he mus sb>te bic zeal
ani stop doing party work. However
high-m;nded this iestuse Of this admin
isirsfion may have looked 10 our oppo-
Dent- 1 can assure you il UAs . stumb'
ling block In the way OF those who
sought votes for him iD IS. Fourth. the
utter failure OF the independent or mug
wump vote 10 msieri2Iize IL Gas found
10 consist of only ; few emAsculsted
preachers and editors. whose only use 10
any candidate il to repei honest votes.
He whom they favored ws' over
whelmed gifh defeat. while be whom
, they opposed w>s triunphAntis elected
II the Iacts which have stated are cor
rect. think your objections 10 Gov
Hill are fulls answered and contrOvert'
ed. | ws< in 80. and have Deen evel
sincf. in : position 70 knog whereof
: speak and I appeal TO the record for ths
trnrhfulne<s OF my assertion. Now ths'
. What object could Hill. have in defeatin.
! Cleveland in that election? he mign
4 have been opposed 10 his nomiustIon. ou
defeat after he vas nominated could
!. bring no benefits 10 Hill II Cleveland
, hsd been elected. then he'd Be out Q
: HiIrs way next fsli instead Of in H.
!, HE defeat could in no wAv lnure q
!. HilI's succe<. and Hill'< chances tor th
/, succession would be much better wii
7 the democracy IN power than with
- - 1.aM ~ u -. 49, 20
: ssv shont preferrinx 20 get s'onz with
Z out New YORK the sentimen. seems
= me unp<frio;ir- uniem ccr.tic. n2sro'
! and seifish-
. an Dfmocrsf and although liz
!. in New York claim an Interest sn
y Ownership in the tame <nd r>nown 20
: by snur Tom Hendricks vonr GoseI
4 nor Gray and your ID. w VOORHEES,. n
a same - il lived on the bank- 81 q
n Wabash 1.-THE best interests % Dem
!. crscy ran Be snbserv~d b. H. will ~uI
= Mort snv one or dozen IDdlsns nem'
u crsis - readily as II he wrre NJ
y Yorker But under Gov Hills leate
4, ship We have been uniformly successiu
- under other. we have failed For Il
reasons given above ] consider u q
duty OF Mes York democrats TO spei
- pisiniy and in season II our fellow
n democrats in other states desire the eIe
~ toral vote OF New York they -hou
- give a. The man uho cAa secure y. Or
- least not force upon u> the man who b
- demonstrated 81. inability 20 do L.
20 Yours truly.
~ J0HS KELLY.
Malone. FraDklin Co., n \.
u Feb IL. ls93-