The state rights democrat. [volume] (Albany, Linn County, Oregon) 1865-1900, 1892-07-08

qulred by law visited The farm OF Mr. John
Davis, where part of the poor Of the
county are kept, and find them in very
bad condition in regard TO cleanliness of
room occupied by them. and find their
bedding scanty. ragged and dirty. They
complain of an insufficient amount of
food, and appear to be scarce of clothing
and dirty in personal appearance. One
patient we found suffering from an ugly
cancer on the lip, who certainly should
have better care and medical treatment.
We would recommend that tie county
purchase piece of land TO be known as
a poor farm on which TO maintain and
better cate for their poor.
In our visit to the Jail we find in our
Judgment the building insufficient in
size for the demands of the county and
insecure for the retention OF bad erimi
malls. And further, that the light and
ventilation are bad to the extent OF being
injurious to the health OF persons incar-
cerated therein. We would respectfully
recommend that the County Court take
some action in regard TO this matter.
We visited each OF the county offices
and find them without exception neat
and in good order, with officers courteous
and obliging.
There being no further business before
Us we respectfully ask TO be dismissed.
II NJ PERgY Foreman.
w o SPERRy.
JAMES DASSALs,
81 HYDE,
PJ BALTIMORE,
THos LEwEs.
HF BopEkER.
Winnehzgo National Bank vs. Joseph
Pear aud Thomas Brandon; recovery Of
money. Continued.
Daniel Houck E, ux SIS W Vernon e,
al: partition. Continued.
Wm T Heller vs. Joseph Pearl e, ux; re-
covery Of money. Continued.
Wm Heron IS PeaIi L Brandon teoov-
cry CT money. Cou,inusd.
DM Osborne " Co rs K NJ Robertson
recovsry OF money. Continued.
Gaines & S,Tin. er rs Linn county
mandate. Continued.
VT Hoffman vs Green Basii Lumber
Co: recovery OF rncny; attachment. Con-
tinued.
Vim T Heller VS. Joseph Pearl Ct ux; re
covery Of money. Continued.
Gibson Myers vsT c S!oper; recovery
OF money; attachment. Dismissed a. COS.
of plaintiff.
Elizabeth Barker vs A z Barker divorce
| Granted; care of minor child awarded 10
plti
Bank OF Oregon Va ] NJ Konkie; re
covery OF money. jury disagreed. Con
/ tinued.
! Stewart & Sox vs. ] Crab.ree; recovery
OF personal property. Default, judgment.
| RI Sabin VS. Allen Bros, recovery oi
money; attachment. Settled.
F. s larson rs Allen Bros. recovery oi
money attachment. Settled.
| r !. Sabin ys Allen Bro,., recovery oil
| money; attachment. Settled.
Richet, Roberts * Bulivs Allen Bros.
recovery o. money attachment Settled
| Jane Compton vs s W Compton; d.
vorce. Granted.
| Joseph Geiz VS. Allen Bros. recovery OF
money; attachment. Settled-
Chas II Dodd & Co. We L Hollida, re.
covery of money attachment Continued
Portland Provision Co VS. Allen Bros,
recovery OF money; attachment Settled.
c a Elson VS. Abner II Edwards et ux
recovery OF money. Continued.
William Faber VS. F 4 Burkhart ct ux
foreclosure. Decree granted; atty's fees,
$50.
Alex Brandon VS. August A Mcdowell
ct al; equity. Continued.
james w Tufts VS. ] A Cumming; re
coveFr OF money. Continued.
Strau,ler Froman VS. VIM NJ Baker and
W + Kelly, recovery OF money; attach
mens. Continued.
Mary Cougill VS. The r & NJ Ins Co;
recovery of money. Continued.
Allen & Lewis VS. Jas f Nixon, recov-
cry of money. Judgment for want OF
answer.
VIM Faner V Pipe etlal; foreclosure,
Decree granted.
II { Kelso VS. b Keisay; action for
possession Of fipersonal property. Con-
tinued.
Ew Langdom VS. W Hay; foreclos-
ure chattel mortgage. Continued.
Herman Heyneman VS. Houey wo
Tung; recovery of money; attachment.
Continued.
Young 10 ] I Hooks; recovery of
money; attachment. Settled.
Assignment Allen Bros, insolvent deb
tors to J J Dubrullie. Dismissed.
VIC Myers VS. L Milbredt. Continued.
Emil Wilbredt VS. S NJ w Hindman
mandamus. Defendant ordered to file
transcript and pay cost Of proceeding.
7 A and Elisabeth Gross VS. Jas Elkias.
Continued.
State of Oregon VS. Dell Savage. Default.
Bond forfeited and reduced to $3.50.
State VS. John Collett. Plead guilty and
fined $50.
T ] Kerns VS. L Case ct al Continued.
] B Boyer vs. Smith & senders; recovery
of money attachment. Continued.
] d Ste,son VS. Smith & Senders; re-
covery of money attachment. Continued.
Bridge & Beach Mfg Co rs G W Smith
and w Cusick; 20 annul assignment
Continued.
Assignment of A Acheson. Fiaal
account filed and confirmed AS, ignee
and assignor discharged.
DM Osborn & Co VS. Henry Kay ct ux; /;
recovery OF money attainment. Continued.
ptiusc u DSaSu MIG 70 fs omitn "
Senders; recovery of money; attachment.
Continued
State upon the relation of ] w Blain
vs G G Burkhart; to obtain clerks office.
Continued.
CP Burkhart VS. Nellie G Burkhart;
divorce. Continued.
Z Adamson VS. Sarah NJ Adamson !;
divorce. Continued.
Ada Anderson vs. VIM Anderson; di-
vorce. Continued.
DM and J NJ Burnett vs. Mary Ken
nedy and Walter Burnett partition. Re-
port OF referee filed and affirmed.
Enoch Cyrus ct al vs. Warren Cyrus ct
al partition. Continued.
State OF Oregon VS. Dell Savage. Bonds
forfeited and reduced to $3.50.