The Hawaiian gazette., 1892-01-05

Court of Honolulu.
/ The Queen W, Yuen Chcugs uulsw.
| fsl possession ef opium. Appeal nom
Police Court of Honolulu.
The Queen Va Martin himerllnkss
LIQUOR selling. Appeal from Police
Court al Honolulu.
The Queen vs. Wal Tai, alias All
TAI, unlawful possession of opium.
Appeal from Police Court Of Homo
lulu.
The Queen VS., Kato: assault aud
battery with a dangerous weapon.
Appeal from Police Coart of Homo,
lulu.
The Queen vs.. Lum Won and
Chong Zip, maintaining lottery. APP
peal from Police Court Of Honolulu.
Peterson for defendants.
Il. Oliver VS.. Hawaiian Gazette Co;
tort. Whiting Neumann for plaint-
in, Hatch fordefendant.
w. Woodruff W.. All Kai Kou;
ejectment, Castle for plaintiff, Ash
ford i Ashford for defendant.
Mo Fan VS.. Min Yong ct al; as
sumpsit. Appeal from decision Of
MeCiilly, j., at chambers. Creigh-
ton for plaintiff appellant; Castle for
defendants.
Poon Kee VS.. c. b. Wilson ct al;
aSsumpsit. Carter for plaintifE Thur
ston & Erear for defendants.
c. w.,Sun wo VS.. X. Kobayashi;
| aSsumpsit. Ashford & Ashford for
plaintiff,
f. II. Redwari VS.. Henry Davis;
trespaSs on the case. Davidson for
plaintiff, Peterson for defendant
Samuel Norris VS.. Emily de Her
blay; damage. Hatch-Davidson for
plaintiff, Neumann for defendant.
waianae Company vs.. Okla Kiyo-
shire; DESERVING contract service. APP
peal from Police Court of Honolulu.
Rosa for plaintiff; Ashford X Ashford
for defendant-appellant.
L MeCully VS.. C. B. Wilson, Mar
shall; replevin. Appeal from Police
Court of Honolulu. Magoou for
plaintiff, Neumann for defendant
appellant
X. Kayama VS.. E q. Hitchcock,
Sheriff. damage. Neumann for plaint-
ifE Hatch for defendant.
Carl Steinmann VS.. Wilder Steam
ship. Co.; damage. Neumann for
plaintiff; Hatch for defendant.
Castle 4 Cooke VS.. L. Ahung; as
sumpsit. Castle for plaintiffs; Ash
ford & Ashford for defendant.
p. G. Camarinos VS.. John Kidwell;
damage. Neumaun-, Cor plaintiff,
Hatch for defe-S
Thomas Chaplin VS.. c. b. Wilson
and ] A. Mehrten; trespass. Ash
fo-e'0 Ashford for plaintiff.
W.l.--.
sumpsit. Castle for plaintiff.
NJ. w. McChesney Il Sons VS.. Wilder
Steamship Co.; damages. Appeal
from Police Court of Honolulu. Hart
well for plaintiffs; Hatch for defend
ants-appellant.
Pow Kee VS.. Wilder Steamship Co.;
damages. Appeal from Police Court
of Honolulu. Hartwell for plaintiff,
Hatch for neutrality-suspicious..
Hop Hing 4 Co. VS.. Wilder Steam
ship Co.; damages. Appeal from
Police Court of Honolulu. Hartwell
for plaintiffs; Hatch for defendants
appellant.
Awana VS.. Wilder Steamship Co.;
damages. Appeal from Police Court
of Honolulu. Hartwell for plaintiff;
Hatch for ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.
Reciprocity Sugar Company VS..
Administrator Estate of ID. kalakaua;
damage. Castle for plaintiff; Hatch
for defendant.
l. Aseu VS.. c. Alec; case Hatch
for plaintiff; Hartwell for defendant.
c. l.. Carter, assignee aud attorney
in fact, VS.. Oahu r. r. and Land Co.
Thurston-Frear for plaintiff; Hatch
for defendant.
a. ]. Cartwright, trustee, VS.. Ha-
waiian Government; damage. Mon
sarrat for plaintiff; Attorney-General
for defendant; Creighton of counsel
for defendant.
Bishop & Company VS.. w. II. Corn
well; assumpsit. Hatch for plaintiff
CAUSES FROM OTHER CIRCUITS.
kaiauola vs.. Kekukahiko; eject
ment. Kane for plaintiff; Rosa
kaulukou for defendant.
j. b. kaunamano VS.. W. A. Kiha;
ejectment. w. L. Holokahiki for
plaintiff.
T. III. Davies & Company vs.. ID.
Morton: assumpsit. Thurston- Frear
for plaintiffs.
John Robinson VS.. Emma NJ. Ma
kuina ct al. ejectment. Rosa for
plaintiff.
BANCO.
In re Boundary between Humuula
and Kaohe; appeal from F. s. Lyman,
commissioner. Hatch for appellants;
Attorney General for the Govern
ment.
Chong Chum vs.. kohala Sugar Co.;
equity appeal from decree oyerruIinp
demurrer. Hartwell for plaintiff;
Castle for neutrality-suspicious..
Ing Choi VS.. ING Sing Company
water controversy in Palolo, Oahu.
Castle for plaintif-appellant Thurs
ton-Frear for defendants.