The sun., 1892-04-01
MAYNARD INQUIRY.
ARP CROSS FIRE BETWEEN COUNSEL
AND WITNESSES.

AND WITNESSES
E~s John Caawailader aud Albert
Istckuey Testify that They Believe that
i,,Aro Maynard Was Guilty OF Larceny
IA. Ab.,rnciing the Dutchess County Re.
j,urps-Iiveiy War or Words Between
iJudse Reilly and Mr.. stsekney.
hp.yY, March 31.-District Attorney Ridg-
* continued before the Joint Committee on
Niciary the same policy Of examination IN
Judge Maynard Investigation to-day thnt
Ibid yesterday. He proved. by tho evidence
jJohn L. Cadwallader and Albert stickney'
ht Judge Maynard's act In tax
away the Emans election returns
m tho Com ptroller's office was Of no Judi
II or iitirated Importance. but that 1t was
IL Judge Mnynards legal opinion OF tho
bet of Justice 1ngraham's order staying
hntv Clerk Emans from forwarding tho
kInnl returns. 1t appeared from tho
Hence of these two members Of the
Il Association committee that all the men,
IA OF the committee are said to be
her Mugwumps or Republicans. and that
hr charges against Judge Maynard were
imado until after the Washington Birthday
kyention. while the acts they complained OF
ke dono months before and told OF in detail
livery newspaper in the State.
k Cadwalader. who 10 q member OF tho
fAssociation Committee and a Republican.
hAed that the Bspublican lawyers had Ned
kiaed copies Of the Emans returns with the
te Board OF Canvassers. and that these GER
Ia copies we're in legal effect equivalent to
1 original returns. so that Justice May
las action in Withdrawing the original
hrns in obedience to Judge Ingra-
his order really mado no difference
kept in his opinion Of Judge Maynard. who.
Thought. should have formally told the
lie Board Of Canvassers Of his action and
hrned the original COPY to them. though SO
las the State Board was concerned the cer-
la copies were sufficient
h John Cadwallader OF New York was
he'd first He testified that the State Board
tCanvassors had no other than the N.Y.
i certificate before them. when tho
3nocratic and Republican counsel made
stipulation not to have any
kther proceedings until after the Court
Appeals had decided the case. The order
fudge Cullen was fled with the County
krk OF Duchess county at 5:45. after the
bur that the office was practically closed for
Asiness sub clerk in the ONCE received
Id filed the papera It appeared by the evi-
bnce given that Republican counsel told the
buAty Clerk to mail the returns in keeping
HAthis order.
W Rdsway-Did It not appear that the Republi.
N counsel had told him that forthwith" meant to
Nsm at oncst Al thought 1t did," answered
kstaess. but not until after he had consulted his
DDunss!."
NsFsll then. Mr. Cadwallader, did not he know shat
HDFas an order from Judge Hursman restraining
49, Of the rsturnA and did not Republican coun-
N9I6kve him Al don't think 90. He waited un-
Hehst moment and then filed them.
~ you believe that the order enjoining him to
~ returns was not binding on him as County
a. - A.id 40 nos: d: stSs. -. only one. He
i.n @h.n @ S, he STAT. so.ld ps of Ganv.... me.
1hs sas asas
there he wsrs wS 0tnss es.ssG COPIES
s.r q APIs.l;. they could b eanvasssd II the
&. ssns to " 9sss
JSas' sat BY and
I . ss ss S
4: only sn..g: ss:,a,s t.: Jaass (! =
Railways been in the party. Asked II he had
e ks ssd d smDsssss shs
AxL saxton-Dld tho results of the alleged crime
az M M never ,SoSyRst ., cG tss
but only that to remove . public paper from q
Eoijudge Culien's order. he said he beiiev-
mat did away with the restraining tnfiu-
Eoithe Fursman order. and that the Coun-
Nerk had to send them to Albany:
%I Albart StiCknaV WAS the S.9It wftnasa
5nsel Reilly. undertook the examination.
1.-The counsel and witness were both snarl-
Nh few minutes.
yReilly-what did you do when Mr. Peckhsm came
EReiny-I didn't ask you what you said to him.
.t:s :ss 81 s, 1!:nf s: .s4.a! 1s
Et IN my chair, smilngly answered the witness.
'y .ja5Hss.ss.l,y3PPd ySu M Mans Il,
ssOr ocpnnor.sueh t,n:, - h questions are gross i'm.
stlekpey being ask led what had been done
sent i9r Mr. MOI GIrdY and asked him to
sate II 70 + stenogFspher and make il as
70 set him for two, or three days after.
oteil lin 70 make haste; We only had
he maks raas fSp fSeasRs lsRRfth That Judge May
had committed grand larceny in taking
Sc9rd from the Comptroller's Office. he re-
ga emkhatically that his report to that
WAS his opinion now. He certainly
Iht him guilty. He refused to say that he
yea the decision OF the com mittee was in
say unjust to Judge Maynard.
f.sliy Then you believe that after couple Of
ekksmnination you were right In finding a Judge
a grand Iarcenyi
s,-I believe our report was correct
Say-l didnt ask that. I asked you if You be.
t.ZSt shaud ind him guilty Of grand larceny
gers II.
~ ..u Suc;onnor-I Coz submit that the witness has
-. aessch-Ths Chair rules that the witness
{s- sssed the question.
SHnsss said that Judge Maynard was writ
~ Hu ~ ssked to appear. or send informa-
- ssu.s appear and did not.
hVinsayJT Saekney what are your politics'
iHNaiy vctsesu Su Democrat nearly as anything
IoltIes as Dsmocratic ticket but am not actively
essscy hn you in favor of the branch OF the De.
Evitness- xnich JGdgc Maynard belongs.
Ewn. 's"nt know which one he belongs TO.
ktdcsss vent on to state that he had never
sIMsnything detrimental to Judge May
nssnasracter. He had not formed his opin-
me political outcome, and had no
.,,n interest In the result. He believed
slded matters to send them 10 the Wowrt
ha haI