Alexandria gazette. [volume] (Alexandria, D.C.) 1834-1974, 1892-08-10
LEGAL.

ID.
Richard II. Remington and Margaret REM
inrton. his wife, Wilton L. Mankin and
Emma Y. Manlin, his wife, William NJ.
Strudcr and Mary VI. Strudcr, his wife,
William L. Clark and Ella V. Clark, his
wife. and Annie l. Johnson VS.. Thomas w.
Clark and Caroline NJ. Clark, his wife,
Richard Beach and Mary \. Beach, his
wife, Edward Harrison and Adelaide Nj:
Harrison. his wife, Clarence NJ. Cullum and
Martha +. Cullum, his wife. Mary '. lay
lor, Charles III. Taylor and Mary /. Taylor,
his wife, Samuel Nowlan and Ruth T.. Now
Ian. his wife. and Thcophilus Nowlan and
Thomas w. Clark, administrator, with the
will annexed of William 4. SisSon, de-
ceased. and William ii. Smith, sergeant of
the city Of Alexandria, administrator OF
Lucinda c. Sisson deceased In chancery.
Memo: The object of this suit is to obtain
g decree constituting the second and fourth
clauses of the last will and testament of
William Afford Sisson deceased ana declar-
ing that Lucinda c. SisSon widow of the said
William Afford Sission took under the second
clause of said will an absolute estate in fee
simple in the reality, and an absolute estate
in the personally of which the said William
Afford Sisson died seized and possessed, and
that the devise under the fourth clause OF the
will to the defendant Caroline NJ. Clark wife
Of the defendant Thomas w. Clark, is incon-
sistant with and repugnant TO the devise under
the second clause OF said will TO the said I.u-
cinda C.Sisson. and TO such fee simple estate and
absolute property in said real and personal
estate and void for uncertainty, and to OBJ
tain partition of the said real estate if sus-
ceptible of partition, if not then Il decree for
the sale of the same and the distribution Of
the proceeds of such sale and of the personal
assets and property of which Lucinda c. SIS
son died seized and possessed. among her heirs
aud distributes.
The defendants, Richard Rcacl and Mary
A. Beach, his wife, Edward Harrison and
Adelaide VI. Harrison. his wife. Clarence NJ.
Cullum and Martha f. Cullun, his wife, Mary
| v Taylor, Charles II. Taylor and Mary L.
Taylor, his wife, Samuel Nowlan and Mary
E. Nowlan, his wife and Theophilus Nowlan,
not having entered their appearance and
Assembly and the rules Of this Court,
and it appearing by affidavit that they
are non-rcsidents Of this State, it is or
dcred that the said defendants appear here
within one month after due publication of
this order and do what is necessary to protect
heirintereStin this suit. and thata copy of this
order be forthwith inserted in the Alexandria
Gazette newspaper published in the city of
Alexandria, once Il week for four successive
weeks and posted ut the front door of the
Court House Of this city. A copy-teSte:
JOHN $. BEACH Clerk.
James L. Cation, p q. jyl9 w1w
VTIRGINIA: In the Clerks Office of the
v Corporation Court OF the city of Alexan-
dria on the 9th day of August, 1892.
Julian r. Burke administrator dc bonis non
cum tcstamcnto anncxo of Jonah Thomp
son, deceased, vs. Eliza C. Harrison Marga
ret A. Thompson, Alfred Carr, Angelica y.
Carr, Louisa Magill. William McEndree
Morgan 1lcEndrec, Lulic Fowler, Susan
Fowler, Eugenia Fowler, Margaret Botclcr
Virginia Botelcr, Henry Boteler. Henry
Boteler, administrator Of Nancy Boteler, de-
ceased; Mamie Iivermore, Louisa Pack
wood, T. B. Earhart, Elizabeth Earhart,
Mary Popham, the widow Of William I.
Popham, name unknown, Laura POpham,
Edwin Popham, Marie AIonastc-io, ST., Don
Maria dc j. MoDastcrio, Guy Popham, Julia
H. Thompson, Julian r. Burke, John w.
Burke, Anna Key Thompson, Anna Thomp-
son, Louisa Thompson CammacE, George
Cammack Elizabeth Burke, Theodore J.
Thompson and William II. Adams admins
traitor de bonis non of Richard II. Veitch,
deceased. defendants.
Memo The object of this suit is TO obtain 4
judicial construction of the meaning Of the
proviso to the act OF Congress, approved March
Sd, 1881, entitled IAN act making appFopria-
tons to supply the deficiencies in the appro
priations for the fiscal year ending June Both,
1891, and for prior years and for other pur
poses" and decree specifying and detcrmin
ing whether the money III compliments
hands realized from the French spoliation
claim of Thompson & Veitch should be paid
to the next of kin of the late Jonah Thomp
son, deceased, living at the date of the appro
p-iation by Congress- or to his next of kinand
their representatives rs of the date of his
DEATH or TO the deyisecs and lcgatces under
the will of said jonah Thompson.
The defendants. Eliza c. Harrison. Marga
ret A. Thompson, Alfred Carr Angelica Y. Carr,
Louisa Macgill, William McEndrec, Morgan
Mcf.ndrcc, Lulic Fowler Susan Fowler Eu-
gcnia Fowler, Margaret Botclcr, Virginia
Botclcr Henry Boteer, Henry Botelcr nd
ministrltor of Nancy Botelcr deceased, Nan
ME Livcrmorc, Louisa p. Pachwool, +. i.
Enrhart. Elizabeth Earhart. Mary Popham. the
widow of William r. Popham, name unknown
Laura Popham, Edwin ropham, Marie Monas-
terio,sr Don Maria dc J. Nlonasicrio, Guy Pop |
ham, Julia IL. Thompson, Anna Key rhomp- |
son, Anna Thompson, George Cammack
Louisa 7. .Canmack Elizabeth Burke, rhco-
dorc j. Thompson and VIM. II. Adams, adj
ministgator, d. b. Ii. of Richard Vcitch, de-
ceased. not having entered their appearance
and given security according to the
act of Assembly and the rules of this
Court, and it appearing by affidavit
that they are not residents of this State,
it is ordered, that said defendants appear here
within fifteen days after due publication of
this order, and do what is necessary to pro-
tect their interest in this suit. and that Il copy
of this order be forthwith inserted in the
Alexandria Gazette, a newspaper published in
the city of Alexandria, once a week for four
successive weeks, and posted at the front door
of the Court House of this city. A copy
testc: JOHN ;. BEACH, Clerk.
George A. Mushbach, q. aug7 w4w
NIRGINIA: In the Clerks office of the
V Corporation Court of the city of AleXan-
dria on the 18th day of July, 1892.
Thomas Fairfax vs.. Ethelbort Fairfax, Cary
b. Fairfax, JEANNE c. Fairfax, John Mon
cure and Edith 1Ioncurc his wife, George
Davis. Mary Fairfax Davis ard Monimmia
Cary Davis. the two last named being the
infant children Of Mon;mmia Davis, de-
ceased.
Memo The object Of this suit is to obtain
decree for the partition Of the lot Of
ground on the west side of Henry street 80
feet , inches south of Cameron street, front
ing on Henry street 80 feet inches and %
feet deep, of which Mary r. Fairfax died
seized, and if not susceptible Of partition then
a decree for the sale thereof and distribution
Of the proceeds.
The defendants Ethclbcrt Fairfax, JEANNE
c. Fairfax, John Moncure, Edith Moncurc,
his wife, George Davis, Mary Fairfax Davis
and Monimmia Cary Davis, not having enter
ed their appearance and given security ac-