The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1892-02-28
Tho American State Reports.

That admirable series Of law books tho
American State Reports THE Bancroft Whitney
Company. San Francisco) continues to main
tain the high standard OF excellence which
was presented by its earlier volumes. In
Volume XIII. which we have Just received,
We find recent decisions from the courts OF hast
resort OF fifteen States OF the Union. Tho
cases are selected with reference to their gem
eral interest and common application. decis-
ions Of merely local importance being omitted.
Mr.. A. G. FREEMAN. the editor. continues to
furnish useful and instructive notes on the
more important cases. and some of these
notes are complete monographs on the
subject under consideration. Thus We find
in the present volume such motto.
eleven page, pages in length. upon the aucs-
is found in the organic Jay OF many States.
prescribing that money shall not be drawn
t IF shs s
verses often asse what !: such sppso
h aSa TO snd Sss
fact partner bu. WHO Is Held out as sne pa art
70 III persons dealing with 90; partnership;
msf Gs Of Fl TIN nsT sas vol
e1trsetsd from ths frst Volume 2, WasS'nss.
ute in the State oi washiDetoH which J pro-
lines OF railway tiiorein shalt be liable TO :hs
oTners Ct yS stHS1 for the iu value e
PASSING trains Tho Supreme a GoS1 " q h the
new State he's recently declared THE statute to
be pens apon
been negligent or net; and irrespectivo Of cps
a'' 4 0Tn0 another ssSinstooins n c %s.
unconstitutionul which made ineurabie chron.
ic mania Or b's for ten
BY tho court Of first instance to DO contraryfo
public policy. because y provided for disso::
Il the maIr iSs tie sGp By Of
view was, erroneous. Tho Legislature itself
act as had been held By the
at rn do tns sGT caud %t
i%r VIZ sRsasos wi}S6 i dssmsd sal,leiffn.;
yo 6s or to tho
10 are ' dex"tsd 70 1sliiopnia dec! sIon. casc
liability Of an innkeopcr for the loss by Are
e ae hTHs9 psnt stfHRaF tit It "a.
re on thr TINT IN |" 90 In
he supreme Court conceded. ior, the sake Il
.rsumsnt. that the innkeerer,s liability was,
nm nm '"! The court !" made mad distinctIas
b between Snd tn.
With Ms wife 70 ascertain II It was GScs
det to \, tp remain there indefinitely
pthcr, hand. to leave at my, moment II her
that the plaintiff paid less than a, transIcnt
to remnin for a considerable time md enter
into all the gayotios OF the place, and that they
bad no other residence than this hotel; Inder
tho plaintiff and his wife were Loardos and
not guests at an inn.
The most important criminal case reportcd
aeas WITH hs een .tH a asht Se
II was Insisted that the Irlsht thus Guaranteed
was before tho trial court. but when It Was
being heard IN snX appellate tribunal. Thesu,
ss csut t e SHss sstensa s
the accused. Is not entitled to be present
4ssew count aa, which hs; rs'dTfhs s9s e
IN INV which a conviction Tor burglary WAS 70.
allowed. after object lon in heha Of the prison.
or. to argue that the defendants character
was, bad because he Ind q right to Introduce
sesa h sh Ss aH as was
state Reports In all. respects confirms tho
%he SphGS Began Mn as so furnish
,us and sstisfactery View to BE- ostainsd any:
ShSrs OF ths gssflS,SYid Of the