The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1892-10-07
NEW ADVERTISEMENTS.
~-~~-~~~~~~~-~-@-
GEO Y. MAYNADIER, Solicitor.
ORDER PUBLICATION.
ORDER
In the Circuit Court
for
Hartford County.
/ In Equity.

Martha Ann Ruth, Hartford County.
John A. Ruth and othersJ In Equity.
THE OBJECT of this bill is to obtain a de-
i cree for sale of certain real estate, situated
in Hartford County, and described therein and
distribution of the proceeds among the parties
to this suit, according to the terms OF Eliza
beth Ruths Last viii and Testament, after
payment of II mortgage debt now held by Mrs.
Lucy 4. Moore. The bill alleges that Mrs Eliza
beth Ruth. late of Hartford county, died in the
month of January, 1890, seized of 65A acres
of land, situated in said county, on the public
road leading from Churchville to Darlington,
adjoining the lands of James Lee, George
>mith and others, composed of parts OF tracts
called out Quarter" and Good Neighbor-
hood" and leaving last will and testament,
whereby she devised said real estate to her
three daughters, Emma j. Ruth, Martha Ann
Ruth and Sarah Rosena Ruth that said Sarah
Rosena died sometime in December 1885, prior
to the death of her mother, unmarried and in
testate, leaving as her only heirs at law her
sisters and brothers viz: EmmaJ Ruth, Mar a,
Ruth, who resided in Hartford county, and
John a. Ruth, of the State Of Dakota, and
both of last named being non-residents of the
State of Maryland. That the said above named
parties are each entitled to and seized of an UNI
divided interest or share in said real estate as
Martha Ann Ruth to seven eighteenths there
of and John A. Ruth, VIM. L. Ruth, Charles
W; Ruth and James Henry Ruth are each en-
share thereof. That said real estate is not sus-
ceptible of partition among those entitled to
same without great loss and injury, and that
they are unable to agree either upon parti-
ton thereof or a sale for division of the pro-
ceeds Also that there is upon the land records
unreleased mortgage upon said land with
other land of 1,70O, executed by said Eliza
beth Ruth and her husband, and VIM. E. Ruth
to s. Preston Gilbert, and by him assigned to
Mary L. Pannell, but it is charged that same is
paid. BY subsequent petition it is shown that
said Mary L. Pannell is now deceased and that
said mortgage is now owned by certain Mrs.
Lucy f. Moore, of Baltimore city, who by
order of Court is made party defendant to
this bill. The bill then prayes that decree
said above described lands and premises of
65L acres more less, and for subpoenas
against the above named resident defendants
and for an order of publication against the
said John 4. Ruth and James Henry Ruth,
who are non-residents of the, tate of Maryland,
warming them to appear and answer the allie
cations of this bill of complaint, &c.
Whereupon it is this 9th day of 0ctober, 1892,
ordered, that the complainant by causing a
CODY of this order to be inserted in some news
paper published in Hartford county, once in
each of four successive weeks, before the 9TH
day of November, 1892, give notice to the
said nonresident defendants, John A. Ruth
and James Henry Ruth. of the object and sub
stance of this bill, warming them to appear i'll
this Court in person or by solicitor, on or be-
fore the twenty third day of November next,
to show cause, If any they have, why decree
ought not be passed as prayed
WIN. s. FORWOOD, JR., Clerk.
|. True copy, test,
7oct WIN. s. FORWOOD, JR., Clerk.