The Durham daily globe. (Durham, N.C.) 1889-1894, 1892-06-23
LEGAL ANOMALIES.
ODD CASES THAT OFTEN ARISE IN
ENGLISH COURTS OF LAW.

The Power of Reconsideration" i'm a
money Transaction An Interesting
Point About Tradesmen's BiIIs-"lIcn
OF straw" in a Criminal Prosecution.
at a time when law reformers are
busy, it may be interesting to notice
some Of the many absurdities which
still exist III English law.
A person buys goods, pays for them
and gets a receipt. The tradesman sends
IN his bill a second time. The purchaser
protests that he has paid, but cannot
find the receipt. Accordingly, the trades
man brings IN action and wins. Soon
after this the missing receipt is found.
And yet the purchaser cannot by law
BRING a new action to recover the amount
he has paid as the result of the first ac-
tlon, unless he a prove actual fraud
on the part Of the tradesman. And why
IS this? Because, according to the legal
maxim, at is to the interest of the state
that there should be some finalitv to
litigation" 1t certainly is not, in this
instance, ito the interest of the pur-
chaser.
a owes 3 an undisputed debt of 600.
After much pressure he comes to 3 and,
dilating on his own misfOrtunes in par
ticular and the hard times in general,
offers him $50 in full satisfaction. B,
partly through sympathy and partly be-
cause having written off the amount as
a bad debt" is only too glad to get any
thing and accedes to those terms. Most
people would think that here was an
end to the matter. 1t all depends,
strangely enough, on the way in which
the money is paid.
If the amount is paid in gold or bank
notes there is no reconsideration" for B
agreeing to accept less than the full
amount due, and therefore if he after
ward repents Of his bargain he can sue
A for the remaining ego in spite of his
promise to be satisfied with $50. And
yet if an old knife, a rusty nail or some
other thing, however trifling, is thrown
in," then B is bound by his agreement
to take the lesser sum in full discharge,
for in this quibbling way the legal theory
Of consideration" is duly satisfied.
Let us suppose that a Mr.. Smith holds
two houses under one lease from a Mr..
Brown, and assigns one of them to a Mr..
Robinson. If Mr.. Smith omits to pay
his rent, or breaks some other covenant
in the lease, Mr.. BrOwn-the superior
landlOrd-can "distrain" not only OF
Mr.. Smiths house, but on poor Mr.. Rob
insOn's as well, though he may be a
model tenant.
A proposes to sell B a piece of land,
and at the same time gratituitously
promises to keep the offer open for d
week. In spite of this A can revoke his
offer the very next day if B has not al
ready accepted it. Legality, again de-
flying all ideas of morality, argues that
there was no consideration for the de-
lay agreed upon.
Very frequently a busybody bringing
a criminal charge elects to be "bound
over to prosecute" at the a~ssizes, even
though the magistrate has expressly de-
cided that no jury is likely to convict.
Now this can be done ION his own recog-
nizances," without any substantial sure
ties. The result is that if, as is often
the case, the prosecutor is impecunious,
the accused when acquitted, cannot,
except in theory, make him pay his costs,
nor does he feel inclined to bring an
action for malicious prosecution against
one who, as the lawyers say, is mot
worth powder and shot" In this way
INSCRIPTIONS ''men of straw have op-
portunities-which they not seldom util-
ize-of putting people to terrible annoy
ance and great expense without mourning
any practical risk themselves.
A lessee always remains liable on the
covenants until the expiration Of the
lease, even after he has assigned it with
the approval and consent of the lessor.
Quite recently two Of the judges sol
EMMY declared from the bench that it
was humiliating to confess that by the
laws of England, unlike those of France,
brokers and other agents could not be
convicted of embezzlement for misap-
p~ropriating money i%ntrusted with them
for investment unless the direction to
invest was in writing. One of them at
the same time t~ersely and truly summed
up the history and present stage Of u
law when he called it "a thing of shreds
and patches" This definition explains
the origin of many absurdities and in
congruities. Still, it scarcely justities
their continued existence .-LOndon Tit
Bits.
A Forgetful Professor.