Evening capital journal. (Salem, Or.) 1888-1893, 1892-06-21
CIRCUIT COURT.

OlhOO1A SOONls
130-State VS.. Thos. Holland, may
hem; pleads not guilty.
113-E. f. Parkhurst VS.. City Of
Salem and Capital City Railway Co.
injunction; amended complaint and
demurrer to same filed.
1S-Mary A. Horn VS.. w. G.
Riggs; suit for possession of rea
property; continued.
31-James Shirley VS.. A. L. Hod
son ct al; action for money; default
as to A. g. Brey.
33-Emma B. Circle vs.. J. Il. Cir
Gle; divorce; referred by stipulation
of parties to M. E. Pogue.
51-Geo. d. Goodhue ct all VS.
James McCourt ct al; injunction
amended complaint filed; dismissed
94-P. A. Kroshus ys. Georg'
Stevens; action for money; contin
ued.
97-Eva A. Grace VS.. Theodore
Grace; divorce; referred to G. E
Robin; decree and custody of mino
child.
9S-A. E. Watson VS.. Hiram f
Dawman, action for money; demur
rer to answer sustained.
1O6-S. B. Catterlin VS.. A. S
Huntly; action for money; demurrer
to complaint withdrawn, answer
filed.
IO9-W. H. Byars VS.. Mary E
Beatty ct al; action for money; de
fault against Jas. w. Beatty.
11O-J. A. Russell vs., l.. w. Ben
son; defculi and decree of foreclosure
lien.
AMENDED COMPLAINT.
f. F. Parkhurst, in the injunction
suit brought by the borse car lin'
against the City of Salem and The
Capital City Railway Co., has flee
his amended complaint with the
county clerk, praying the court t.
enjoin the defendants from in any
manner interfering with the plain
lifts rights, privileges and franchises
on State and 18th streets, and from
building, constructing or operating
on those streets or ON any part o
them a street Car line or Car track, a
threatened, until the final hearing q
the merits of this cause or until tn
further order of the court, and finall.
for a perpetual injunction against dc
PENDANTS until after the expiration O
the term of thirty years and for sucl
other and further relief in the prem
ises as is meet and proper for a cour
of equity to grant.
The complaint alleges that tn
electric line is building its road ol
the streets in question without an.
other authority than the adoption G
the report of its committee, recon
mending that permission be granite
to the defendant corporation to bull
and construct street car line on tn
north side of the center of Stat
street from Liberty to 18th and o.
18th street to the Southern Pacifi
passenger depot.
The complaint further alleges tina
the proposed change which tn
plaintiff contemplates making Will
in reasonable time, if not intel
ferred with by the wrongful act
and conduct on the part of defend
ants, will make his street car sci
vice over said road precisely simila
to that which the defendants ar
proposing to operate.
| A further allegation is that 500
after the council adopted the repor
of the committe recommending tina
the electric line be granted a pei
nit to run its cars on State and l2tl
streets to the depot, five of the mem
bers of the council petitloned tn
mayor to call a meeting of the coun
Gil for the purpose of taking actiol
and resembling the adoption OF tn
report, but the mayor refused to cal
a meeting of the council at thel
request, and that there are onl.
eight members of the council and
the mayor had complied with tn
request of the five members tn
council would have rescinded th
action by which the recommends
ton of the committee was adopted
as the plaintiff is Informed and be
ieves,
J.J. Shaw, representing the cit.
and the electric line, filed his genel
al demurrer last evening. JUG
Boise's decision is awaited with III
terest.