Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1892-03-03

Cunningham undertook 10 show that
the Lehi sugar factory would get from
the government aud Territory bounty
about IL! per cent. ON the their invest.
ment.
W. II. Irvine said hn was glad to
learn that the factory hRu been able 20
pay a dividend, aud that showed the
Territory had been the gamer by II. a
/ gentleman had handcd him state
ment showing that on the starting OF
I this factory the California sugar men
I reduced the price 60 ~ 10 give this
/ Territory n reduction or saving Of
| slS,OOJ ON what sugar was ahipped
/ here, while the Territory had been
benefited $50 900 besides thls through
the building anu operating Of this fac.
tory. lie was IN favor Of home manu-.
faciures and hence for the bill.
snow said that Cache county owns
about 80 per cent, VI tue stock Of the
sugar factory aud that II was distribut-
ed among all classes. In his county a
| meeting mai been held lately for or.
/ ganizing u canneiy where all are Dem
Ocrals. They expressed themselves In
favor Of oxempting from taxation GER
tain factories, hut were not In favor Of
u sugar bounty.
Aruett said he had stretched his
I ideas lite In favor OF iron factories
only In the bill, still reserving his Op.
I position Ia bOunties.
Pike styled the bill AZ class lcgislA-
/ ton. He had money invested In iron
| ana cannery, neither Of which had
/ been successful.
MOrilz urged that the members
| should lay aside their Democratic
| principles and work for the good Of the
Territory, ior which they are here.
The bill failed on vote Of IL yeas to
! 10 nays.
The vote was; Ayes Adams, Allen,
Cotton, j. ID. Irvine, Kimball, Law
/ renee, Montgomery, Moritz, Olsen,
| Pierce, Snow, Stokcr. Nays-ArnUt,,
| Cunningham, w. II. Irvine, Mackny,
Marshall, Nebeker, Pike, Sargent,
| Wright, the Speaker.
II. Il. 1875, relating to proceedings 10
| obtain possession OF real property.
| Read anu passed.
III. +. 40, the world's Fair bill, was
| partly feau, when j, u, Irvine moved
1 To make II n special order for Friday,
| that II might cnme up after the Coun-
/ ell had acted on its bill oil similar im.
/ port. The motion failed.
The question Of the amount TO ap-
| propfiate for the Utah exhibit was dis
Guessed. The committee had placed the
| amount nj s50.OU0, and there were mo-
| tons IN MAKE the amount In different
sums from 1000 down to S25,0Oj.
The votes ON the two amounts were
as iOllowh:
On the $4,000 amendment; Ayes
Allen, Cotton, w. II. Irvine, kimhall,
| Lawrence, Pierce, Snow-7. Nays-
Adams, hrnett, Cunningham, j. ID.
Irvine, Montgomery, Morl,z, Mackay,
Marshall, Nebeker, Olson, Pike, 5ar-
gent, Stoker, futile, Wiight-l5.
On $4,000 proposition; Ayes
Adams, Arnett, Cunningham, j..
ID. Irvine, Montgomery, Mackay,
Marshall. Nebeker, Olson, Pike,
/ Stoker, futile, Wright-l3. Nays
Allen, Cotton, w. IL. irvine, Kimball,
Lawrence, Morltz, Pierce, Shows.
| Mr.. Sargent offered nm amendment
striking out all the bill after the enact.
Ing clause, ana substituting sections to
appropriate money to be paid by special
taxes on various properties for two
years, including mines, the assessment
TO he one-fourth OF n mill for each OF
| the Year, 1923. He was opposed to
bonding the Territory for the fair. He
did not like II to oe thrown up to the
outside counties that the cities are lay-
ing tho expenses Of the Territory aud
keeping up the poor counties. He
brought up the question Of the Gov.
ernor's power OF appointing commits
sioners 10 spend the money. Sargcnps
amendment was voted down.
a motion to defer action failed.
I nh. of 4
ayes to 0 nays.
A message from the Governor gave
notice OF hts approval Of IL. j. NJ. o.,
relative 10 Rlchfeld's townsite, IL. IL.
So, attorney's fees; IL. Il. 80, notary
| public, to place date OF commission on
! certificates; II. Il. 50, relative 10 mar.
shals and sherlis, and II. f, 81, to in
validate certain evidence.
Several bills came In from the Coun-
Gil ami were appropriately referred.