Evening capital journal. (Salem, Or.) 1888-1893, 1892-10-11
IN JUDGE BURNETT's COURT
The Docket Called Monday as
Usual-Tuesday's Business.

GRAND JURY.
James Munkers, farmer, East
Salem.
VIM. Fry, Mechanic, Aurora.
John Calvert, farmer, Gervais.
Johu Beise, farmer, Salem.
Ed. Hall, farmer, North Salem.
S. B. Ormsby, farmer, Silver
Falls.
Louis Miller, farmer, Salem.
w. g. Isenhart and John Scollard
were excused.
S. B. Ormsby was elected foreman
of the grand jury.
Jesse Macy and Marion Taylor
were chosen bailiffs.
CALL OF DOCKET.
Nv. II. Barrows VS.. Lucetta M.
P. Hutchips, action for money; set
tied.
PA. Bush vs.. VIM. and Polly De.
haven, same; settled.
u. H. Luun vs.. E. j. Murphy
action for money; settled.
I0-Wm. Waldo vs. f. s. Dear
born, same; settled.
1S-Ella &. Baker vs. Thos. B
Baker, divorce; at issue.
AS. f. Butler VS.. l.. III. Poujade
action for money; same. 8. f. But
Ter VS. l.. j. Poujade, action fol
money; default and judgment.
15-A. G. Bronky vs.. Henry Bron-
ky, divorce; default, referred tC
Webster Holmes to report facts and
law.
17-F. G. Baker VS.. Eric Ander
son, to perfect title; to answer today
1S-H.T. Bowman VS.. e. E. Wild,
action for money; leave to answer
20-Lee Brown & 20. vs. B. r
Robertson, action for money; al
issue.
26-Henry Cleayeland VS.. Marga-
ret E. Cleayeland, divorce; demurrer
overruled, defendant stands by de
murrer.
2S-H. M. Cooper VS.. Paul Kip
pin. action for money; settled.
29-Emma B. Circle VS.. j. f. Cir
Gle, divorce; continued.
3l-Sarah J. Yates vs.. John A
Yates, divorce; default, referred tt
M. e. Pogue to report facts and law
32-Frank Deickman vs.. Franl
Bauer, action for money, settled.
33-Hattie Easton VS.. City of Sa
lem, damages; demurrer argued.
3S-Mary Goodenough vs. Evar
Daley, damages; withdrawn.
44-H. w. Harding vs. Genev,
Harding, divorce; default, referred
to M. E. Pogue to report law and
facts.
47-Henness Bros. vs Allen &
Smith, same, garnishee; continued
49-F. G. Kennel vs. Eric Ander
son, action for money; continued.
58-W. J. Mickle vs. Thos and An
thony La Lond, same; default, judg
ment, order for sale of attached prop
erty.
Gle. Meyer vs. A. HI. Smith
same; answer filed.
63-Jessie M. Neal VS. Maggie M
Neal and Mary A. Condit ct al.
James Walker, Rankin Edgar an(
II. G. Porter, referees; to report q
this term.
66-E. B. Robertson, assignment
G.. HI. Burnett, assignee; continued
7l-Danl Siewert ct al vs Chas
Casebeer, to recover property anG
judgment; continued for term.
72-Snell, Heitchscu & Woodar(
VS. III. w, Cox, action for money
continued for service.
74-E. r. Spaulding ct al "
Jacob Morelock, same; answer filed
75-G. w. Sweaney VS. b. M
Dimick, same; same.
77-Louis Smith, VS. Annie Smith
divorce; Judgment by default. j.
Fitzgerald appointed referee, to TAX
testimony.
7S-E. G. Small vs Matild,
Baker, action for money; judgmen
of non-suit at motion of plaintiff.
Sd. IT. Talbot vs s. p. r. r.
Co, damages; continued per stipula
ton.
S5-Thos. Taylor VS. Metzger d
Messenger. action for money; con
tinued for service.
S6-J. M, Wallace ct al VS. VIII
Iamette Valley Fruit Co. same; de
fault and order for sale of attached
property.
S7-John Welch ct al vs ]. Il. Coz
ct al. suit for partition; sale con
firmed.
Waterhouse IL Lester Co VS. 7
X. and w. 4. X. Smith, same; de
fault and judgment vs. t. Il. Smith
92-Chas L. Watt vs Delian A
Catterlin ct al, action. for money
settled.
93-G. A. Whitney VS. M. w. ant
G. 4. Orion, same: settled.