, 1892-04-27
TYPE WRITER FEES.
Opinion in The North Yakima
Superior Court Case.

OupClIUl AUull SCtSCs
The Respondents are Prohibited
from Doing the Acts Complain
ed of-what The supreme Court
says.
Notice-All decisions Of The supreme
courtwill appear in THE DAILY and WEEK
LIZ TRIBUNE.
State ex rel. 3. a. Rockford, prosecuting
attorney Of Yakima County, VS.. The Su-
perior Court Of Yakima County and Sol.
Smith, Judge. No. sos.
The reIatorls the prosecuting attorney
of Yakima county; the respondent, Hon,
Solomon Smith, is the superior judge of
Klickitat county; and by reason Of the dis
qualification of Hon. Carroll B. Graves,
superior Judge of Yakima county. to try a
certain cause, entitled Benton ct al VS..
Johncox ct al, Judge Smith was in Decem-
ber last called to preside at the trial of that
cause. The cause thus on trial is a civil
action to which neither the state nor Yak
ina county is party. On The 18th day of
December, the court made an order direct
ing A. L. Slem1nOnS, court stenOgrapher, y
to make two copies OF his notes of the testi-
moRy. allowing twenty cents per folio to
him therefor. On the 18th day of Febru-
ary, 1891, SlemmOns presented a claim
AGAINST VI kina cnuntv for S27 IN for 13Q
fSlios Of testimonv transcrihe1 hv hin,
which was IN the same e1av aIInwad hv tha
court, and the auditor 0ftle county was, in
the order of allowance, commanded to is
sue a warrant upon the the county treasury
The court. apparently for liz nnrnose sec a
HAVING mon fhe record its asons for or
6ering the ravn9enf, of fha stenoora nbar;s
fees eansed q second order rn ha nade and
and dated back ia the time of the orieina1
order Dee 18Th a. follows.
tTt'annearino fo tbe court. in tbis ca7se
tba1 thfs il an eoI1itv canse inyoluino tbe
RIGHTS ~ 129 nersons III ~nsa the yuateT9s ~ =
certain stream If water II, YalKima coT3ntx,
and that each Of said nersons claims sar3s,
rate and ennitabIe relief and hat oraat
amount III testimony mnst IL faka1 -
order to determine these rights and the
conrt beino of the on1nion fbst n cannot
nronerlv discharge the dufies deynived .e,Ir9
1non II In irving fhis canse withnnt tha
festinon17 i tafan Nv stanoora11fa,. ~
der tbe controI and s1neryisiap II Az
court: Therefore he II ordered that II T.
SIemmons steno1raphar H. anJ IA
harahv a,1Y,o;,,faJ hT t5a o,,1t + 49, ~ -
steno9rap,ic renorf of the eyiGlorna a1,J
nToceedipns in tFis case and franscriGa 'ti,e Az
same for tRe nse of fhe conrt y -
rThe auditor n,3Giar tbe dvica of H. -
1ator and the coIlntv sione,s .ofI,sad
to issue The warrant and was on Febrn nv
15th cited IL annear ana show na1,se 1.rhyy
IL shnuJd not IL nnnisI1ad fnr ! contor,r,fJ
special counsel beine ASSIGNED nv fhe coI1rf
to nrosecnte tbe@f4eIi3one19t He was fortj,O
with adindged to he niliity bl1t, iiIdomant.
was snsneW1ad bera1sa ~ answearaT fhaf
he had acfed nnder tie advice If lie re- no
Iator. Rnt Nv the same order sneniaI conn
sci were dirested 10 ino1re info The co,l.
3I1ct If liz nd tha
1'-A~- ANA'
for their ALLEGED contnmacv in advisine ~ fTe
auditor. The anditor under the TY4sH nress,Ire fr
of the nrocaadinos againat him issinad fLe
TenT1ired MI va arranf Gn Febrliarv 1stb one
T,esh a citizen taxnaver If Yalxima coI7T,tv
commenced an action in the snne1ior court
IL restrain the anditor from iss11in@ his
warrant fnr fhis. sum of S97 ~ ami an0tbar
similar allowance made H. tFa steno-
sranher and an19Iied IL the court fo1, a re-.
stra1nino order which was refI1sed
r. a1nnears fhat al tha tima tba na+itio,,
was fled here the case Of Renton VS. Tobn-
coY had been m trial, for d Gavs. HAT IFS
fTial wonIG conafn1a from tyye5tv IL fbirtv
orspher Will foot mn to nearly or nnifa
tygd tI3onsand dollars And + is allegsd
without eontradieti0n tbat frnn1 tines *
t;Tna nTfjers Viii IL na9a raG11irino tba
auditor ia draw and issne to the sfeno.
9ranher warrants for martial navmepts fo
Ii i'm xThi will any HVF6 6O,y
ternnt nroceadinos az n tbe ,1oafanca ii.
raadv r6aptTonaf1 or tbat If tha a1Jdifor
shall viaId and issue oclarad
number r1rrr Of such warrants viii be nttered
4vhicb will mass into tha hands If fhird
narties renderine much litioation neces-
Earv Ia ,,ravent tReir collect1on froy,, the
,conntv
Tle' !, oi,, contentinn ;e +lat ,,,o,, +l,a
trial of . civil acfion +ha noI1rt Ia. no
nower to CHARGE The county with the ar.
pense Of a stnnoora T,beria notas IF fbe tes.
f;naonT Tbat III can a. u Il caTta
novel nronosition and # is one for witch
4be able cpnnsei for the resnondents cite rs
10 no 1,Teeedent r, civil ection tha 4ro. ~
ductidn IF their nrnofs rests WIFI III ra-
snactiva Y1a9,tias frTha s+afa ana its iT1str,T.
n5Pent tbe connty frIrnisI1 ths coI1rts e,1d
HER necessary officers and records hl1i
everv qerviee excent that of tha indge is.
cnnlnensated n money fees exacted rom
fbe pertias Tbe Witnesses ORC I3aard aad
s1InIass the ,artias otherWJisa nrovide tbair
taetin,onIy rasts onIw Il, tba n3an,nru of +ha
imd5e wbn 5ears # n this tI,eTa i NJ
Sa4iffsre3ca batHJean 1eoai and aa,1ita he az,
Hons oT batwaen IonSc o,s sbo1f oaSas All
stand mon the same fontino
T1a sann1,d orea iesr- II Ra3tn2 ~ TobncoY
was hasad mon Iba assuned ;r,noseih hil;tT
thst fbe co,Irt con6 rrnnerIy frv 20 %
;~ol;l1e, 90 na,tas a3,i
rioSts ho,1t the oid of sianngra ySI,ars
h9t + carfainlyy roe nj la,atofora occp-rad
tba+ reties ~ 60 ona,elicaf fad
it p1 m frs NJ ~ at tair osSo o"st ~
~ whin he cnnrt,s ant;op ooTIS ia
h osllided VIII cartaintv anG a arc
cenyinced thar # wonId he 50 IN This nv inY