Wheeling register. [volume] (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1878-1935, 1892-09-28

". OLJc. 1IUpCItl OOfC 4lOA otA>Sei ~
400; an increase Of $500; excessive.
w. 3. Anderson. Property 1889 Eon
street. valued at 81, 200; should be 81 600.
E. Humes. Lot Q, square /, Hydlnger's
addition; increased from 800 to 81, 100; TOO
much.
Henry Reiter, Lots and TO- square 80,
81 500; excessive.
Fred Ali. Property valued at 8, 5OO; IL
creased to &, 500; too high.
VIM. p Myer. Property 1888 and 800
Jacob street, $500; also corner Forty
eighth and Water, S, 600, an increase OF lUO
per cent; too high.
Mrs. Catherine Bowers. Lots and .,
square %, increased from 49, 800 TO $o,2OO;
lot 3, Lagrange addition, increased from
81 200 to 81 600; lots 10 and IL, Lagrange al
dition, increased from $1,000 to &, 4OO; To-
tai increase g, 900; excessive and unjust:
CA. O'Brien. Lot 4, square 80, Sprlgg
& Richie addition, &, GOO; paid $60O
Geo. Bowers. lots and 9, square 90, in
creased from s., 500 to a, 100; lots and ),
square 20. increased from 81, 200 to s, 500;
lots 10, II and II, square 20, increased from
81, 900 to q, 200: total increase, $5,2OO; I'M
reasonable and unjust.
G. Kettler, property valued at $500; re-
duce to &, 450.
Jas. Boycott, part of lot 4, square II, in
creased from 81, go to g, 800; excessive.
+. Richter, property valued at SIOO;
building had no occupant until August.
Edward Steel estate. Property on WOOD
between Thirty-sixth and Thlrty.seVenth,
81 $50; $3.50 in excess of actual value; near
electric power house.
A. j. Schultz. Property valuation In
creased $500; would not object to S25O
Henry Dannenberg. Property increased
f,o - 70 =
wears AGO, and improvements S20O.
q. H. and j. G. Medick. Property cor
ner Thirty-sixth and Water streets, 8, 55O;
bought three years ago for 81 500.
Estate Of Z. Jacob, lots Nos. to ., TO
13, 81 TO 43, AZ to 81, IS TO a, IS to IS, 90 TO
90, total valuation $3.50, 1891: this year
total valuation SOC, $50, an increase OF more
than 220 per cent; entirely unwarranted
by the condition of land; below level OF
street, and flooded with water.
United States Glass Company, factory
"H,n formerly Hobbs Valuation 1892,
lots Z, II and IL, square 40, Sl,SOO; lots to
l6, square fl, and Improvements, $50, OOOi
lots II and % and improvements 7 900;
lot 50x300 feet, 800; total, $50, 700. 1872,
total valuation, $47, 900. Property was
actually bought for $50, 800 cash basis; in
creased to more than so per cent. above
price paid for property; restore original
valuation, 1891.
Wood Bros. Planning mill property In
Eighth ward. In 1892, assessment on real
estate and improvements aggregates S2S.-
200; capital stock is but 30, 400, including
all property, real and personal, owned by
petitioner; valuation 8, 500 more than real
value.
Henry w. Etz Property No 6, Thirty
nineth street, g., $500; too high; s., 800 would
be enough.
John Becker. Property 1927 Jacob
street increased from s., 200 to $500; for
mer figures fair and just.
Mrs. g. EtZ. Property 1915 Eotf street,
increased from g, 800 to s., 500; exorbitant;
&, 500 fair valuation.
Peter Becker, 1927 Wetzel street 1881,
5000; 1892, 81 400; unjust.
Lydia B. Smith and others, 80 Thirty
sixth street, increased from Sc, COO TO 81, 200;
$1,000 enough.
Christ Kalbitzer. Lots Nos. 9, 8, 4, 10,
II and ~, valued at $500; $4,000 fair
valuation.
VIM. Eckhart Property assessed at
&, 400; g, 600 enough.
Daniel Becker. Property No 1889 and
4245 Jacob street, $3.50, an increase Of
$1,000; should be 1880.
George Hearth. Valuation $3.50; increase
Ol cDOU cACCSSlNC.
O. Coniff, property corner Forty-third
and Eotf street, &, 100: increase Of $500;
too high.
John Mikels, property valued at 81, 700;
1891, 81, 100; 81, 400 enough.
Mrs. Rebecca Wheat, lot l, square S,
Richie addition, g., 300; far exceeds real
value Lots ., 3 and 4, square II, $4,000;
exceeds real value. Lot As, Lagrange ad-
dition, 81, 500; 81, 500 enough. Lots AZ and
81, Lagrange addition, 81, 800; excessive.
Robert Barlow's estate. Lots 5 and g,
Richie addition, $500; excess Of real
value; &, 500 enough.
Penerauti Marschner, property 5000
Wood street, valued at 81, 1870; cost only
s., 400
Edw Marschner, property $500 Jacob
street, g., 700; more than paid for IT,
Henry Hundt, 1892, 81, $50; 81, 900 enough.
Mrs. a. Hughes, property valued at
g, 400, increased to 5000; unfair and I'M
just.
H. Tape, increased from $500 to
s., 800; excessive.
Mrs. Rider, house 1889 Wood; excessive.
E. :Hofreuter, 1871, s4,4OO; 1892, $4,000;
too high.
Mrs, Rassel, increased from $500 to
8, 800; excessive.
David Sihler, east two-thirds lots Nos
10 and IS, Ritchie's addition, 500 and 800
personal in 1891, now $l.3O0, willing TO be
assessed S400 on above. Total assessment
$1,000, g, 900 would be enough.
Henry Graebe, lot No. II, Square No. 2S,
No 40l9 Wood street, 1891, $1,000: now
s., 600. Not just.
Schmul bach Brewing Company, lots Nos.
10 and IL, 1891, 3, 900; 1892, II 600 Former
assessment was high enough. Lots Nos.
and 9, 1891, 81 900; 1892, 81 900. Would not
sell for over &, 900. Lots Nos. 81 and AZ,
and piece Of ground on which the brewery
is located, 1891, SIS, 500; 1892, $4,000. In
provements not completed and buildings
still In the hands OF the contractors, one
building still upoccupied, aud brewery
house partly occupied since July 18th by
permission of the contractors. We claim
not chargeable with taxes on these improve
ments until they are completed Lot No
4, square No. 40, 1891, $500; 1892, $1,000.
Improvements not worth 500.
L. j. Bickerton, FOrty-hrst and Jacob
streets, 500. Too much.
James Flanagan, lots Nos. in square
%. 4 in square No. 10, in square No. "a,
and 10 in square No. "a, $500 in 1892, an
increase Of 81, 200. In some cases above the
real value, and unjust
Andrew Welsh, No. 37l2 McCulloch,
5000; 5000 enough,
Sophia Tuppe, lots Nos. 3, 4, 81 and 50,
&, 400; last assessment high enough.
d. c. and j. j Fahey, 81, 900, an increase
of 5000 on lot No. 16, square No. 50. Ritch-
les addition.
VIM. Horstmann, lots Nos. 40 and Al, La
Grange. $500; south half lot No 10;
square No %, Ritchie's addition, 5000, lot
No II, in square No. Il, same addition,
$500. Too high.
John Reitz, one-half lot No. II, square
No. &, Ritchie's addition, 1891, s., 200; 1892,
s., $50.
J. A. Ankle, lot No. 10, and with half lot
No. 20. square No IS, Ritchie's addition,
500 each, or 81, 100 in all Too high; should
H.. h,,, rQsn aanh