Evening capital journal. (Salem, Or.) 1888-1893, 1892-10-07
for possession of real property.

for possession of real property.
= 44-H. w. Harding vs. Geneva
Harding, divorce.
45-S. M. w. Hindmap VS. J. B.
LaFollett and II. Phillebei, action
for money.
46-John Hughes VS. d. ]. Light
ner es al, same.
47-Hennesss Bros. vs. Allen &
Smith, same, garnishee.
4S--Isom, Lanning & Co. VS. w.
w. .McCoon, action for money.
49-F. G. Kennel VS. Eric Ander-
son, same. 't' tf ,'
SOP. A. Kroshus vs. Geo. Ste
vens, same. t'' ~
Sim. Kamins & Son vs. Martin
Gerschback, same.
52-Little, Maxwell & Co. VS. Jas.
Denham & Co., same.
52-Minnie G. LOFTS VS. Essie M.
Hagey ct al, partition.
54-Tom Lee VS. Mrs. T. A. Holt,
damages. 4
55-Geo. McCully and Bert Macy
VS. State of Oregon, petition for writ
Of review.
56-H. II. Merrill and G. III. Stew
art VS. w. w. McCoon, action for
money.
57-Isaac McCuIly VS. E. M. Croi-
san, same.
5S--W. J. Mickle VS. Thos and An
thony La Lond, same.
59-Mitchell & Lewis Co. VS. l..
Provost, same.
6O--Jas. McClosky vs. w. P. Ben
nett, same.
Gle. Meyer VS. A. H. Smith,
same.
62-Marx & Jorgensen VS. A. E.
La Rogue, equity; M. e. Pogue,
referee. es, IA
63-Jessie M. Neal VS. Maggie NJ.
Neal and Mary A. Condit, partition.
64-Pacific Builders Supply Co.
vs A. M. Sestanowich, B. Childs ct
al, to foreclose him.
65-Priscilla Paquette VS. John Pa
quette, divorce. Ar/
66--E. h. Robertson, assignment;
G. III. Burnett, assignee. a-.t,,t
67--Chas. Reichistein VS. w. P.
Bennett, to foreclose lien.
6S-S. r. Hammer, admin A. d.
Risdon, VS. Caroline w. Jackson,
action for money. ~ =
69--Salem Bldg. & Loan Asso vs
l.. Il. Harrison ct al, same.
70-Anna Steinbrecker VS. Herman
Steinbrecker, divorce.
Z 71--Danl Siewert ct al VS. Chas.
Casebeer. to recover property and
Judgment.
72-Snell, Heitchscu & Woodland
vs. H. w. Cox, action for money.
73-Stewart & Sox, VS. J. Crabtree,
same. 4
74-E. r. Spauldlng ct al vs
Jacob lMorelock, same. fr
75-G. w. Sweaney vs. b. M.
Dimick, same. isy
76-John #. Searles vs o. p. Pen
uington ct al, same.
77--Louis Smith, VS. Annie Smith,
divorce.
7S-E. G. Small vs Matilda
Baker, action for money.
79-Stayer & Walker VS. L.. Pre-
vost, same.
S1-State of Oregon VS. r. M.
Thompson, selling liquor without
license.
S2-vs same, same.
Sd. T. Talbot VS. S. p. r. r..
Co, damages.
S4-V. J. Troyer VS. Annie Troyer,
divorce. 2 w
S5-Thos. Taylor VS. Metzger 81
Messenger, action for money.
SCI. M, Wallace ct al vs. Will
lamette Valley Fruit Co. same.
S7-John Welch ct al VS. J. It. Cox
ct al. suit for partition.
SS-A. Fl. Williams ct al VS. VIM.
Purcey, action for money.
S9-Waterhouse & Lester Co VS. II.
X. and w. T. r. Smith, same.
9O-John Welty VS. Rankin Edgar,
same. q In4
9I-Mrs. M. E. Wilson assign
ment; w. T. Boothby, assignee.
92-Chas l.. Watt VS. Delian A.
Catterlin ct al, action for money.
CSC. A. Whitney VS. M. w. and
c. e. Orton, same.
94-Amanda Wheeler vs. Ida M.
same.
95-Will & Link VS. A. L. and
Anna Patton, same.
96-Robt. III. Winner VS. Maggie |
Winner, divorce.
97-R. M. Wade 4 Co. vs. G. A. |
Roberts, action for money. \. II
9S--John Wolford & Co. VS. Ida
and w. T.. Loughmiller, same.
99-G. w. Waterbury VS. q. A.
Vanderbeck, same. ~ !
1O0-C. @. Wheeler vs. II, p. Van
same. |
101-Arnold Wink VS. Clarence
Brown, foreclosure. /
l02-J. G. Bouer VS. VIM Jones,