The Lake Charles echo. [volume] (Lake Charles, Parish of Calcasieu, La.) 1876-1898, 1892-12-16
sUeAR AND TEE T4RZEF


gTrTD F--n -rrTr -4urpr
-
We hava alanaza s1zzs77lis e-f
t1s expresses q sae EEssss Ea1 aE'y
If Eais salAz hra &c saz az 77z, isEE alial
1oAEs - Elzl1azszs E1sss an1alsal1t
tins aaz1srz Ezli ii1-l p asg q
sha parz-s 49, azss Ha zzgsz =
/ sly g aaa aa zlsait lsiii'Esl
! 81 usgE W snE o. :. ''11''
EEEzs 8 - a ll Laill-s4s
- z1 BszE Essza1Ia e ar 5sssa oaaf'
gEss
q - lzs azsa ziii-lai aasss 'llsasill7 ~
Haans 4aa 1EEzz-g II asst asallEs5
aEt 8 e As4ss 40 sEs z1As 10 tilszlss VIZ
be- Esaias % zz-ssrl1 laHs % mas isliiltf'oi
~ 1aa p1Ht Ezaas = he 'f'Esia a.
lha zzs7 as 1il1t ar 'sss'sI1 a1-lslz'7 ''.i
uEuEg Ru91aaz Eatst ErT Ea1f Ct &rs
aarF ssHzEiEHl q thE -aBzsrluED lfs1ta,ss
aazaala's u7sEsuaE 81 0IlEallss iii DE- zs11sr
srTEr7 ~ uHaul tts l3lElIiEnaE1Slll srl-lli''s-
4 plaaB q Eaaz8ugrla.Is sn,zzatllElz'EE5 llTa
daREEssHuHH Rs 8 FEsBBsiEitllG. -liii8rE ll5 NC
8Ennrs SENSE n rgas1D 7fn- 0ttsEzEE 3
t1uuueF scr Ebs Elrs1nazI1a luilllIzZLEE' MAJ.
I inn F7es 1rtEbEEt E5z 1sEsEBI i1tlEns.
TINS Anaun.y Al 1sz1islatIan S. 2DE Ia
he aszTiBusB3 &c Ainh4Iaaey, hi WIS
matched II tbs aaztils an1BID II a'tahB
Sherman and 1hs lBzuBHH 3hEt 81 h 81
may be tEaaaiy Istataa iss .fDibUTs. ashsn
the blst DDEgrass caHFEnsa Hns ssE1oa5
npgu ats pBEiry OF still higaET prulsCrlHn
/ for the manufacturers, ahEy found 81
inCnuFsnisnt surplus II the tzBssuTy
which WAS inconsistent and lnrumPHia'
bic with the idsR Of higher autlsS and
increased revenues and they set TO worn
10 get rid Of tbis surplus and the sngRE
bounty wassa happy inspiration which
afforded an opportunity OF nisp0slng o.
ten or twelve million dollars, winch
added TO the fifty or sixty miihun'
which the sugar duty was pouring int,
the treasury, made an aggregate Of be
tween BIIty-fVe and seventy milhol
dollars difference in the total reVeuu,
of the country, and was made pretex
fOr the necessity of additional dutle
upon nearly all the commodities which
might compete with American mann
facturss Nor was it ever the inten
ton that the sugar bounty should lonl
3 remain; in fact they knew from the yer.
nature Of things that it could not ION
2 survive because it was unpopular Wit
, all classes But the repeal OF the dut
Oh sugar had been decided and TIM
was simply plan for letting the suga
planter down easy and because the
knew that the country would not stan
by and see the sugar interest killed 6
one fell blow.
So 1t vail be seen that it WRs no iOV
for the suuth that prompted the Bepuk
Ican party to throw TINS sop Of bouDi
On BugHT 10 compensate ior The eDm
loss OF protection by government TO thl
important industry, nearly the only on
Of an agricultural nature which va
protected Oh which 1t Was possible /
protect ; q duty on other agricuItUrl
J products being aiarce from the TACT thl
We moi only do not import them, bU
on the contrary they form nine-teuth
Of our exports.
Bat Uhile We feel certain that th
+ sugar bounty must 60, We do not thin
that the sugar planter need fear lhl
j.. has interests are in jeopardy. a rev
Q nue. tariff can scarcely be devised Tia
q shall lenye sugar Cd the ilee list al
is while the prospective duty that will
mot h,, as lsy,a ma the Ona ransalad 4