The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1892-01-15
Peddicord 4 Peddicord, Attorneys.
ORDER OF PUBLICATION,

John D. Pfeiffer ! In the Circuit Court for
VS.. }Garrett county in Equity
Louisa Pfeiffer. No 556 Equity,
The object of this is to procure divorce a
rinculo mdtrimcnii OF the plaintiff from the
defendant.
The bill alleges that the plaintiff intermar-
ried with the defendent, who was then Louisa
Cindel, on the 9th day Of May. A. d.. 1901, In
Belmont county, Ohio, where the plaintiff
was working at his trade rs n black smith and
where the said defendant now resides.
2 That the plaintiff is q native and resident
his life
s. That on the 18th day OF May, 1891, in Bel
mont county, Ohio, the plaintiff was at the
instance OF the friends OF the defendant, ar
rested upon the charge OF baslardy, was re-
fused bail, and committed to jail.
4 That after remaining In jail long time
officials and Others, carried TO the residence
OF the defendant aud there whilst in custody
OF the Officers OF The law, without his consent
Justice OF Peace and the defendant and the
plaintiff were declared to be man and wife.
S. That the said pretended marriage was
against the viii ofthe plaintiffand never had
HIS consent; and he is advised that the same
is null and void.
8. That Immediately after the pretended
marriage ceremony was performed the plain
tiff left the premises and the presence OF the
defendant, and has never seen, lived with nor
had intercourse with her since, nor has said
pretended marriage ever been consumated.
q That the defendant and her friends and
others, who had said marriage ceremony per
formed whilst the plaintiff was imprisoned,
perpetrated gross fraud upon MIN and that
said parties, as he is informed and charges,
perpetrated this outrage for the purpose oi
shielding brother-in-law OF the defendant
from grave charge.
g. The bill further alleges that the defen-
dant was before the said pretended marriage
guilty OF illicit carnal intercourse with n man
other than the plaintiff, which Intercourse
was unknown to the plaintiff at the time OF
said pretended marriage, which said carnal
intercourse the plaintiff is ready to prove to
the satisfaction OF the Court.
9. That the conduct OF the plaintiff has been
blimeless In the premises and at all times
has been above reproach.
10. The bill prays that said marriage may
be annulled and set aside and that the plat q i
till may be divorced a villculo fnStrimonii
from the defendant.
II. The plaintiff prays for all such other and
general relief as the nature OF his case may
require.
II is thereupon ordered by the Govt this
18TH day OF January, A. ID. 1892 that the com
plainant cause a copy ofthis order together
with the object aud substance ofthe bill to
be inserted in some newspaper published In
Garrett County, once a week for four success
sive weeks before the 18th day of February,
A. ID. 1892, giving notice to the defendant In
said bill and warning her to appear IN this
Court in person or by solicitor on or before
the 18th day OF February. A ID. 1892 TO show
cause, ifany She has, why decree shall not
pass as prayed. +. y; TOWER.
ssASs ~ No. KssA CLERK Circuit Court
True Copy-Test:
46-4t f. r. TOWER Clerk