The record-union. [volume] (Sacramento, Calif.) 1891-1903, 1892-05-13
SUPREME COURT MINUTES
DEPARTMENT ONE.

THURSDAY, May IL, 1892.
Court convened at 10 a. NJ. Present Pater-
son, j., presiding; Harrison, j.; Garoutte, j.;
Brown, Clerk; WaShburn, Baliff.
14,672-Johnson VS.. sSweeney-Argued by
Kalelgh and Barcar for appellant, A. j. Dob
olns Tor respondent, and submitted.
IL, SSO-Corcoran, by Guardian, O'Donnell
US. The City of Benicia, a corporation-Upon
motion Matt Clarkeu for respondent, and pur-
suant TO message from j. A. Mckenna for APP
pellant, ordered that cause be submitted on
briefs already filed.
Il, 57-Gwin VS.. Sweetsen ct al.-Pursuant
10 stipulation filed herein, ordered that cause
be submitted on briefs already filed.
| 14-Prior VS.. Diggs-Upon motion j. c..
Ban Tor appellant and pursuant to slip
ulatlon filed herein, ordered that respondent
have twenty days in which time to file
reply brief, appellant twenty days to answer,
cause thereupon TO be submitted.
l4,S27-Bank of Iolo VS.. Weaver ct al
Pursuant TO stipulation filed herein, ordered
that appellant have until May IL, 1892, in
which time to file and serve opening brief, re-
spondent twenty days thereafter tc reply, APP
peilant fifteen days to answer, cause there
upon to be submitted.
II, 759-Burr VS.. Board of Supervisors of
Sacramento County 14,76O Il oyne VS..
Ryan, District Attorney-PuSuant to stipula-
tions filed herein, ordered that respondents
have thirty days in which time to nile reply
brief, appellant fifteen days to answer cause
thereupon to be submitted.
14.o11-lrelan, Jr., VS.. Colgan, Controller,
etc.-Argued by Matt Clarken for appellant,
Acknowledgement W. II. a. Hart for respond
which time to file reply brief, appellant
twenty days to answer, cause thereupon 10 be
submitted.
Court adjourned for the term.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
SACRAMENTO, May ~, 1892.
Court met at 10 A. M. Present, McFar-
land, j., presiding; DeHaven j.; Sharpstein
j.; Culp, Deputy Clerk; Washburn, Bailif.
IA, 624-Natoma Water and Mining Com
pany vs.: Hancock ct al.-On motion of s.
Scion Holl for appellant and consent of
Daniel Titus correspondent, ordered appellant
have twenty days to file brief, respondent
twenty days.to reply. appellant ten,days to re-
ply thereto, cause to be thereupon submitted.
IA, 77S-Warnock VS.. Harlow-On motion
OF a. l.. Hart and counsel of attorney for re-
spondent, ordered appellant nave one day to
file brief, respondent fifteen days to reply
thereto, appellant five days to reply thereto
cause To be thereupon submitted.
IA, Observation-Disclosures VS.. Wingfeld-Pur
ant to stipulation fiied herein, ordered APP
pell2nt have thirty days to file brief, respond
ent fifteen days to reply cause to be there
upon submitted.
14,S63-Jones VS.. Duner-On motion J. w
Armstrong and consent of attorney for APP
pellant, ordered cause submitted upon brief
on file.
Ia, S47-Natoma Water and Mining Com
pany VS.. Hancock ct al.-Ar9ued by Barclay
Tor appellant, Daniel Titus for respondent, or
dered respondent have twenty days TO file
brief, appellant twenty days TO reply, cause to
be thereupon submitted.
14,S11-Lrelan, Jr., vs.. Colgan Controller,
etc.-By order OF Chief Justice Beatty, ordered
cause transferred to Department One for hear
ing and decision.
Adjourned for the term.
IN BANK.
SACRAMENTO, May 12, 1892.
&c, SS4-People VS. Walace-Judgment and
order reversed. De Haven, j. We concur:
Garoutte, j.; Harrison, J.. Sharpstein, j.; Pater-
son, j.
Ia, 772-Brown VS.. Prewett-The writ of
mandamus is denied and petition dismissed
Beatty. Q. J. We concur: Mcfarland, j..
Sharpstein, j.; Paterson, j.; Garoutte J.
14,S11-Irelan vs. Colgan, Controller, etc.
Ordered said cause be transferred to De
partment One for hearing and decision. Beatty,
CT.
,S77-People VS.. Observation-Disclosures
| and order reversed, and cause remanded for a
new trial. Paterson, J. We concur: Nc
Farland, j.; De Haven, j.; Harrison, j.;