The Livingston enterprise. [volume] (Livingston, Mont.) 1883-1914, 1892-06-25
DISTRICT COURT,
A Large D"cket-Cases Dis posed of During
the Week

y1SDOSPu
the Week
Inc June term of district court for
fark county convened Monday, Judge
Frank Henry, presiding, and the usual
court officers in attendance. The fol-
lowing attorneys were registered for ap
pearance in cases docketed for the term
Savage & Day, A. j. CAMPBELL Allan r.
Joy, NJ. D. Kelly, W. H. Poorman, John
L. Smith and II. j. Miller, Livingston
A. u. Hatch, Thomas X. Lee and j. E.
Barbour, Big Timber; w. F. Meyer, A.
T. McArnelly and Thomas Ross, Red
Lodge; Charles S. Hartman, William A.
lines, Luce T. Luce, H. G. Cockrill, E. P.
Caldwell and Sydney Fox, Bozeman
Word, Smith & Word, and Cullen, San
ders & Shelton, Helena, and w. A. Clark,
Virginia City.
Following are cases disposed of during
the week
The State of Montana Vs. Louis
Wolff. The county attorney having
filed his reasons for not filing an infor-
nation, and no information having been
filed, the defendant was discharged from
custody and his bondsmen released
Nelson Story ct al. vs.. Charles A. Car
son, ct al. Continued for service.
Taylor Brothers & Co. ct al Vs. Steb-
bins Mercantile Co. ct al. Continued
by agreement.
John Pullman & Co. VS.. Charles H.
Stebbins ct al. Continued by agree
ment.
james S. Boardman VS.. Fellows D.
Pease ct al. Plaintiff dismisses suit by
consent without predjudice.
William Hall vs. James Mcbride ct al.
Continued for service.
Mary Gillen ct al. VS.. Edwin Patter
son ct al. Set for trial for Thursday,
June Both.
Helen Smith VS.. Charles Smith. De-
fault of defendant entered for want OF
answer.
Ornaldo Baker VS.. John B. Cook ct al
Defendants given leave to file amended
answer.
Electrical Engineering and Supply
Co. vs.. Livingston Electric Light com
pany. Savage & Day withdraw their ap
pearance as attorneys for plaintiff and
case dismissed for want of prosecution
Thomas Fortune vs.. Grant & Whalen
} Plaintiff dismisses suit without preju
dice.
A. Krieger & Co. VS.. J. D. Whelpley
Continued for service
; National Park Bank VS.. William NJ
Thompson. Continued for service
Paul A. Zuber VS.. Grosvenor w. Barr,
ct al. Set for trial for Saturday, Jun.
, 25th.
Eva G. Imo vs.. Nicholas Imo. De
fault of defendant entered for want o
answer, and Charles w. LaBarre ap
J pointed referee to take testimony.
Thomas McKeever vs.. Michael Nolan
Continued for service.
Sarah j. Goar vs. S. H. H. Goar. De
fault of defendant entered for want o
answer.
F. S. Webster VS.. Sadie Seeley. De
murrer submitted to court without ar
l gument.
Frank Bland VS.. J. H. Conrad L. &c
June 25th fixed for settling statement ol
c motion for new trial.
A. Krieger & Co. VS.. w. A. Smith
June 25th fixed for settling statemen
on motion for new trial.
v James Lavelle vs.. o. P. Templetor
!. sheriff. June 25th fixed for settling
!. statement on motion for new trial.
Hatch Bros. & Co. VS.. H. p Nelson
Plaintiffs dsn iss suit as settled.
E. H. Talcott Vs. A. B. Lind ct ul
Q Plaintiff dsmisses suit as settled.
@ J.C. Lyons VS.. L. r. Sadler. Contin
o ued by agreement.
z Olive E. Heglin VS.. Albert heglir
o Decree of divorce granted and plaintiff
q awarded the custody of Marian Myrtl
Q Heglin, minor child.
o John J. Murray vs. Livingston Cox
y y and Coal Co. Defendant given leave
g file amended answer and cause contir
o ued on application and at costs of d.
3 fendant.
9 Livingston Cooperative Building an
10 Loan Association VS.. Stephen S. Rhod
g ct al. Judgment for plaintiff for 81 ,991.4
principal, s24.75 insurance paid, s424
. taxes, $40 attorneys fees and costs {
70 suit and decree Of foreclosure entered
S E. Goughnour Vs. NJ. D. Hoover ct a
. Judgment for plaintiff for s31S4l wit
y interest from November 80, 1891, at tn
y rate of 10 per cent per annum, and s.
attorneys fees. For defendant, CARR
Mortimer, s172.42 with interest and s.
attorneys fees and sc expense of film
l. claim; for defendant, Olaf Mattsol
~ s31 .35 with interest, $50 attorneys fee
and s6 for expense filing claim. Deere