The record-union., 1892-05-06
SUPREME COURT MINUTES.
DEPARTMENT ONE.

SACRAMENTO, May 5, 1892.
Court met at o A. NJ. Present, Paterson, j.,
pres ding; Harrison, j.; Garoutte j.; Brown,
Clerk; WaShburn, Ballff.
20,S1 People vs. French-Argued by j. NJ.
McGee for appellant, Deputy Attorney-Gep-
eral Layson for respondent. Upon motion
OF counsel, ordered that respondent have
! twenty days time in which to file and serve
| brief, appellant ten days TO reply thereto,
cause therenpon TO be submitted.
2OS1S-People VS.. OBTien-Argued by L.
W. jerks and A. l.. Hart for appellant, John
h. Raker, counsel for Attorney General, for
respondent. Ordered that respondent have
n1teen days time in which to file brief, APP
pellant twenty days to reply thereto, cause
thereupon to be submitted. Motion to admit
appellant to bail argued and submitted
2O,S97-People VS.. Falon--UpOn motion of
Deputy Attorney-Gcneral LaysOn, ordered
That cause be continued to July calendar.
II; l6-ClarkE on VS.. Hoyt-Pursuant to
stipulation nled herein, ordered thatappellant
have twenty days from and after May2, 1892,
III which time to file and serve bre respond
ent twenty days to reply thereto, appellant
ten days to answer, cause thereup0n 10 be
submitted.
14.S93 -Bohnert vs. Bohnert-Argued by j.
n. tarraher for respondent and submitted.
IA. .12S-Ramelli VS.. IriSh-PurSuant TO Stip-
ulation filed herein and upon motion Of A.
Swisler for appellant, ordered that respondent
nave thirty days time in which To file brief,
appellant twenty days to reply thereto, cause
thereupOn TO be submitted
,S26-Sheplar vs. Green ct al.-Pursuant
10 stpulaton hled herein and upon motion of
]
pellant have thirty days time in which to tite
and serve brief respondent thirty days to re-
ply thereto, appellant ten days to answer,
cause thereupOn to be submitted.
Court adjourned to Friday, May 6, 1892, at
10 a. NJ.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
THURSDAY, May 5, 1892
Court met at 10 A. NJ. Present, Mcfarland,
J., Presiding; DeHaven, j.; Sharpstein j.:
Cglp, Deputy Clerk; Washburn, BailiIf
l4.I21,Mothtt vs.: Bulson-On motion of
ui ln how 81,
Drlet, respondent ten days to reply; cause to
be therCupOn submitted.
!. .l4,5GS-Hulsman vs. TODD ct al.-On mo-
tlon OF Eaker, ordered appellant be allowed
twenty days TO file brief herein, respondent
hiteen days TO reply, appellant ten days to re-
ply tnerSto, cause to be thereupon submitted.
14,7O2-Seelick VS., DeCarlow ct al.--Argued
by Raker for appellant, Goodwin for respond
ent, and submitted
II, ,o6S-Farley VS.. Doyle ct al.-By consent
Oh attorneys, ordered appellant have thirty
days TO nle brief, respondent twenty days to
| reply. appellant ten days to reply thereto
cause 10 De thereupon submitted.
II, $50 -LOrenZ VS.. WaldrOn- Pursuant TO
supulatlon filed herein, ordered cause con-
tlnued for the term.
0,909-People VS.. Manning There being
no orlets filed herein and no appearance Of
attorneys, ordered judgment and order ap-
peiled rom are affirmed.
20,906- People VS.. Lane-Same order.
2O,91O-PeOple VS.. BenkWith-Same order
14,636-People VS.. Hamilton-Same order
Adjourned until % a. NJ. tomorrow.
IN BANK
1S,O41-Board OF Education of Sacramento
VS.. Board of Trustees, etc.-Ordered cause be
placed on bank calendar tor Monday Nav
9th, at 10 a. NJ. Beatty, c. j.
IA, 4,4O7-Landregan VS.. Peppin-Order af-
firmed. Garoutte, j. :
We concur-DeHaven, j.. Mcfarland, j.:
Paterson, j :; Sharpstein, J.
We dissent: Harrison, J.; Beatty, c. J.
Ia, 4,121-FOrsyth VS.. Dunagan ct al.--Judg--
ment and order affirmed. Beatty, c. j.
We concur: Mcfarland J.; DeHaven, J.:
Sharpstein, j.; Garoutte,J.; Paterson, j.; Har-
rison, J.
14,602-Murray VS.. acknowledgement af-
firmed. The Court
14,754-W,der vs.. Superior Court of San
JoaQuin-Let the writ be dismissed and re-
spondent have Judgment for costs Ga
route, j.
We concur: Harrison, J.; Paterson, j.; Sharp
stein, J.
Special concurrence in Judgment: McFar-
land, j.