The morning call., 1892-10-12
HENLEY SJSP
He Though
Not Be
Fx-Membsrs Of tn Y
tify as to tt Def naaas
s. .emeats.
HENLEY SUSP

The Bruner tr | was again foeus Of
interest yesterday It the City hall.
| George Lezinsky me attorney. stated that
! Assemblyman Shaaatan mad said he knew
/ nothing about the merits Of the anti-scalp-
ers' bill, but that ne was Introducing 1t at
Burners request.
Barclay Henley, the foreman OF the last
Grand Jury, said hat Bruner on his exam
ination before thai body testified that he
had never seen 0ttinger and would not
know him if he wage 20 meet him.
Bruner afterwaId acknowledged that be
might have gone .Hto Ottingei's place once
for liquid refreshn snts.
Mr.. Henly was c0seiy cross examined IN
the afternoon. Es brought IN his 80tes
taken at the exam nation Of Bruner before
the Grand Jury ard stated that they con-
tanned all that he considered material for an
Indictment in this city.
Did not some members of the Sacra-
mento Grand jury come down to ask for in
formation regarding some suspected per-
sons" asked Reddy fer BusGer.
They did" replied the witness.
Did you give IL was the next question.
81 gave them some facts about Bruner
and another, but declined 10 do more the
witness answered
why was that?
Because | didn't think they were actinS
in good faith. / made these test cases ans
decided that If the Grand Jury at,Sacra
mento found an indictment against BrnnsF
| would furnish them with lots more in-
formation against numbers OF people, whe.
l believe, should be Indicted
Then You sus. scsed that Grand Jury's
good faith?"
Yes" retoIted the witness decidedly.
'and | still do
Jeremiah Lynch. the eggptologist, anti
Buekleyite and ca grand Jnrgman, was
long time on the stand.
He corrOb0rated Henley's testimony and
stated tnat he had handed his notes of
Burners evidence before the Grand jury
TO j. z. Dunn Of tie Citizens Defer SO As
ISOLATION, who had lost them.
He was asked Incidentally Why the ID
Tense Association Detitioned the Superi0
Judges to retain Judge Wallace in the oftie
of Presiding Judge
Because we co.. sldered him the mos
competent man, was The reply which wa
cut short by Judge Wallace himself pro
testing against the Introduction Of little de.
tails.
-Elisor H. H. Scott's evidence was 10
the same line, although ke was DOT certain
as to the time of Burners visit to Ottinger's
place. as admitted by hin.
Charles Holbr001 and Alfred Bowler,
ex-grand 1urymen. testified that Brnner had
declared he had no been in 0ttiDger's plaee
of business more IL Al once to take n drink.
In the afternoog Barclay Henley ami
jeremiah lynch 70 recalled By the de-
Tense.
They were quite frm 10 their denials g.
personal bias again l}runer, nAair 'si-'
that in all their action agaius
were influenced b. q desire fol
good.
why did you tlse notes,
during Burners examination before tue
Grand Jury?" asked Pat Reddy.
las matter Of STORY" was the reply.
"Are you hstoEieU - inquired the at
torRey.
Yes" replied tie witness promptly 81
will hand You one u ny books il you"
mo, thank you no, thank you, pro-
tested counsel energeticslIy. ''Ths history
of this case is enous Tor my brain at pss.s-
emit"
Henry l.. Davis as lhe last witness as
to Burners former Examination before the
court adjourned until this morning.