San Antonio daily light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1886-1907, 1892-12-02
THE COURTS.
TmR1Y-sEvENTH DIs1 Riot.


This morning the judgment nisi agains
Bob Campbell was set aside; he pleaded
| guilty to the charge of gaming and wa
! fiued sos, and given 10 days in the county
| Jail.
| A like judgment was taken in the cas-,
! against him for exhibiting a gaming table
The case against Dolores Ortiz, for thief
| from the person, was continued by con
sent.
VIM. Hiley. charged with arson; con-
| tinued by consent.
Ralph Spare, Adolph Riley and James
Bingenian, theft OF one beef cattle. con-
tinued by consent and set as the first
criminal case next term.
The state of Texas filed suit this morn
ing against Ed COnoway ct al, on forfeit
ed bond.
The following indictments were re-
turned by the grand jury, yesterday.
Sol Morris alias Charles Morris, theft
from person.
R. r. Figuiere, theft over $50.
James C0nnors, burglary.
lsidore Vasquez, burglary.
lSidore Vasquez, theft under 500.
Newton Matthews, assault to kill and
murder. This is the man that 1t is charged
made an assault on VIM. Singleton, June
20, 1891.
This morning John A. Frazer filed suit
against G.. w. Harwell, ct al, on prom
issory note and foreclosure of deed of
trust.
45 DISTRICT.
This morning business was transacted
in this court as follows:
932. John Wilkens, ST., VS.. Sophie FIR.
Reimann, eXecutriX of the estate of G.
A. Reimann, deceased; judgment by de-
fault.
llO7. John Wilkens VS.. Sophie FIR.
poinnann inHanpnHant triy Of rho
estate of G. A Reimann, deceased; dis
missed; at plaintiffs cost.
1895. r. I'll. McCracken VS.. J. P. Cruger,
on promiSsory note; judgment for plain
tiff.
1349. F. F. Collins Manufacturing COM
pany VS.. 5. Simon and E. Niggll, on
prom ,sSory note; dismissed at plaintiffs
cost.
1868. John Fl. Cox VS.. San Antonio
Stock Yards, company, on note and to
foreclose lien: judgment by default.
791. A. B. Frank & Co. VS.. B. F. Wright
& Co., debt and attachment; judgment
for defendant. Lawrence.
1471. l.. j. Hart VS.. J. f. Burns, 7. c.
Lambeth and E. ]. Pietzcker, on note
and foreclosure of lien, continued, subject
to be set aside.
s63. w. b. Wright VS.. Froboese & San.
tleben, l. & G. n. R'y. Co., judgment
against steamship company to which
plaintiff excerpts and gives notice OF ap-
peal. q
1869, Francisco Ruiz ct al VS.. L. J.
continued.
154S VIM. Dobrowalski VS.. E. S. How
ward ct al. on note and to foreclose lien.
dismissed as to Nicholson and Judgment
by default as to Howard; defendant eX
cepts and gives notice of appeal.
1890. Ada Waelder VS.. F. Il. Cadwalla'
der ct al, On note, plaintiff given leave 10
file first supplemental petition, and judg-
ment for plaintiff.
1891. Ada Waelder VS.. c. M. Cadwall
ader ct al. on note, and to forecloSe lien,
plaintiff given leave to file first supple
mental petition, and Judgment for plain
tiff.
1863. A Staacke VS. Chas. Ochse. ct AL,
judgment for plaintiff.
JJsnCE's COURT.
Yesterday in Justice Adams court the
case of Bernard Klotz q Co. VS.. A. B.
1872 Sc; the jury returned verdict for
plaintiff for full amount and defendant
gave notice of appeal.
Last night at s o'clock Justice Adam
performed the marriage ceremony, at his
residence for Hugo Sauer and Miss Eliza
beth Benz.
At o o clock he married Martin Shea
and Mrs. Nancy Cameron.
COMMISSIONERS COURT.
This morning, the report of coun-
ty attorney b. j. Dewitt on petit.
ion of citizen in precinct No "a for local
option within a radius of three miles OF
Savers pos iOffi ;e, was adopted.
The report reads that according to the
statute the commissioners court can or
&c an election only in a justice precinct
a town or a city and The petition for such
election must be signed by at least fifty
persons: and as those requisites ale not
complied with, the county attorney SAYS
the commissioners cannot lawfully grant
the petition.