The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1892-01-04

The Queen VS.. Lum Won and (
Chong Zip; maintaining lottery. APP
peal from Police Court of Honolulu. |
Peterson for defendants.
r. Oliver VS.. Hawaiian Gazette Co.; |
tort Whiting for plant |
if; Hatch for defendant.
w. Woodruff VS.. All Kai Kou;
ejectment. Castle for plaintiff; Ash
ford & Ashford for defendant.
Mo Fan VS.. Min Yong ct al; as
Appeal from decision of
McCully, J., at chambers. Creigh-
ton FOR plaintiff appellant; Castle for
defendants.
Poon Kee VS.. C. B. Wilson ct al;
assumpsit. Carter for plaintiff; Thur
ston & Frear for defendants.
c. w. Sun Wo VS.. K. Kobayashi;
assumpsit. Ashford i Ashford for
plaintiff.
F. H. Redward VS.. Henry Davis;
trespass on the case. Davidson for
plaintiff; Peterson for defendant.
Samuel Norris VS.. Emily de Her
blay; damage. Hatch-Davidson for
plaintiff; Neumann for defendant.
Waianae Company VS.. Okla Kiyo-
shire; DESERVING contract service. APP
peal from Police Court of Honolulu.
Rosa for plaintiff; Ashford & Ashford
for neutrality-suspicious..
L. McCully VS.. c. B. Wilson, Mar
shat; replevin. Appeal from Police
Court of Honolulu. Magoon for
plaintiff; Neumann for defendant
appellant.
X. Kayama VS.. E. G. Hitchcock,
Sheriff; damage. Neumann for plant
if: Hatch for defendant
Carl Steinmann VS.. Wilder Steam
ship Co.; damage. Neumann for
! plaintiff; Hatch for defendant.
Castle 81 Cooke VS.. L. Ahung; as
sumpsit. Castle for plaintiffs; Ash
ford & Ashford for defendant.
| 2. G. Camarinos VS.. John KidWell;
| damage. Neumann for plaintiff;
Hatch for defendant.
Thomas Chaplin VS.. G. B. Wilson
and J. a. Mehrten; trespass. Ash.
ford 81 Ashford for plaintiff.
w. r. Castle VS.. w. l.. Wilcox; as
sumpsit. Castle for plaintiff.
NJ. w. McChesney u Sons vs.WildeT
Steamship Co.; damages. Appeal
from Police Court of Honolulu. Hart
well for plaintiffs; Hatch for defend
ants-appellant.
Pow Kee VS.. Wilder Steamship Co.
damages. Appeal from Police Court
of Honolulu. Hartwell for plaintiff;
Hatch for neutrality-suspicious..
Hop Hing & Co. VS.. Wilder Steam
ship Co.; damages. Appeal from
Police Court of Honolulu. Hartwell
for plaintiffs; Hatch for defendants
appellant.
Awana VS.. Wilder Steamship Co.;
damages. Appeal from Police Court
of Honolulu. Hartwell for plaintiff;
Hatch for defendants-appellant.
Reciprocity Sugar Company VS..
Administrator Estate of d. Kalakaua;
damage. Castle for plaintiff; Hatch
for defendant.
L. Aseu VS.. G. Alec; case Hatch
for plaintiff; Hartwell for defendant
G. l.. Carter, assignee and attorney
in fact, VS.. Oahu r. r. and Land Co.
Thurston-Frear for plaintiff; Hatch
for defendant.
A. J. Cartwright, trustee, VS.. Ha-
waiian Government; damage. Mon.
sarrat for plaintiff; Attorney-General
for defendant; Creighton of counsel
for defendant.
Bishop & Company VS.. w. III. Corn.
well; assumpsit. Hatch for plaintiff
CAUSES FROM OTHER CIRCUITS.
Kalauola VS.. Kekukahiko; eject
ment. Kane for plaintiff; Rosa.
Kaulukou for defendant.
j. K. Kaunamano VS.. w. A. Kiha
ejectment. w. L. Holokahiki fol
plaintiff
T. H. Davies & Company VS.. D
Morton; assumpsit. Thurston-Freal
for plaintiffs.
John Robinson VS.. Emma NJ. Ma
kuina ct al; ejectment. Rosa TO
plaintiff.
BANCO.
In re Boundary between Humuul;
and Kaohe; appeal from f. S. Lyman
commissioner. Hatch for appellants
Acknowledgement for the Govern
ment.
Chong Chum VS.. KOhala Sugar Co.
equity appeal from decree overrulins
demurrer. Hartwell for plaintiff
Castle for neutrality-suspicious..
Ing Choi VS.. ing Sing Company
water controversy in Palolo, Oahu
Castle for neutrality-suspicious. Thurs
ton-Frear for defendants.