The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1892-12-22
Circuit Court Proceedings.

he Dec nlOtr term OF the Clr
cult Court of Garrett county con-
vencd Monday with Hon. II. W.
Hoffman, associate Judge on. the
bench. There were ninety cases OH
the trial docket. thirty four origi-
mails ana six appeals. The follow
ing cases on the trial docket were
disposed of:
No. ass. j. Miller VS.. Silver
Bell Mining Company, Judgment
under the rule. Hamill for plain
tiff.
No. 29-Edward CalIies VS.. A. S.
Sell, ct al; judgment for S109.64.
Hamill for plaintiff.
No. 30-S. Baer's Sons vs. Welsh
& Browning: judgment for plain
tiff. Peddlcord & Peddlcord for
plaintiff.
No. 3l-S. Baer's Sons VS.. j. P.
Bowermaster; judgment under the
rule. Peddicord & Peddicord for
plaintiff.
No. 33-Hoban & O'Hanly VS..
John S. Clark; Judgment under the
rule. Hamill for plaintiff.
No. 36-G. 5. Hamil VS. A. NJ.
McLsire & Co; judgment under the
rule. Hamill for plaintiff.
No. 4l--Calvin Thompson VS..
Taylor & Cox; judgment for 1896.
"a. Peddicord h Peddicord for
plaintiff.
No. 42-W. and II. Allen & Co.
vs.. }. p. Bowermaster; judgment
under the rule. Hamill for plain
tiff.
No. AS. Seninger VS.. Newton
Gels; judgment under the rule.
Hamill for plaintiff.
No. 45-George ". Wolf vs.. Tay-
lor 4 Cox; Judgment for 800. Ped
dicord & Peddicord for plaintiff.
No. An. L. Frum VS.. Taylor
& Cox; Judgment for sl67.55.
Hamill for plaintiff.
No. 49-John Mcmillan VS.. Jas
per Guard; judgment for S131.
Mitchell for plaintiff.
No. SOP. Il. Cartwright VS..
George d. White; judgment for
5000. Peddlcord & Peddicord
for plaintiff.
No. 52-J. S. Hartzel vs.. H. A.
Patten ct al; judgment for s221.0O.
Sincell & Thomas for plaintiff.
No. SD. L. Nav VS.. Taylor
& Cox; Judgment for s5O.55. Ped
dicord & Peddicord for plaintiff.
No. 56-James W. Robinson vs..
TAYLOR & Cox; judgment for 1925.
Peddicord & Peddcord for plain
tiff.
No. $50. W. Bernard VS.. lay
lor & Cox; judgment for $107.35.
Peddicord & Peddioord for plain
tiff
No. White. Gleesoon & Co.
VS.. Taylor & Cox, judgment for
s9O.Sl. Peddicord & Peddicord for
plaintiff.
No. 62-Char!es Lee vs.. Taylor
& Cox; judgment for s61.S5. Ped
dicord & Peddlcord for plaintiff.
No. &C. L. Paugh vs.. j. Lee;
judgment for sl25. Hamlll for
plaintiff.
No. S2-E. H. Sincell ct. al. vs..
John McFadden; Judgment under
rule; Thomas & Sincell for plain
tiff.
No. S3-E. II. Slucell ct. al. VS..
q. Browning ct. al; judgment
under tho rule. Thomas g. Sincell
for plaintiff.
No. 87-Mahalath Warwick vs..
James Kane & Co; set for trial
Wednesday December %; Peddi-
cord & Peddlcord for plaintiff;
Richmond and Sloan for defendant.
No. 89-James Kane & Co. vs..
John A. Robinson; set for trial De-
cember %, 1892; Richmond and
Sloan for plaintiff; Peddicord &
Peddicord for defendant.
No. 90-U. NJ Stanton vs. II. +.
Potts; petition dismissed by order
of petioner's cause; Peddicord &
Peddicord for petitioner; Hamill
for respondent.
A. l.. Gnagey. Of EVANSVILLE, was
adjudicated an lnsolvent and G. s.
Hamill, of Oakland, and ID. J.
Lewis. of Cumberland, were ap-
pointed preliminary trustees.
The court will hear testimony on
Tuesday, December ~, as to the
bona fides Of several conveyances.
made BY Gnagev, short time before
the petition was filed. Messrs.
Hamill, Lewis and Richmond. rep
resent the petitioner, +. II. Sincell
and Thomas j. Peddicord. repre-
sent the parties holding SAID con-
veyances.
State vs. Charles Cramer; assault
with intent to rape; bail fixed at
$1,000. Hamill for State, Peddi-
g..