The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1892-04-06
CIVIL JURY CASES.
Judge Zane Makes Heavy Setting Of
Them.
Judge Zane yesterday made the following
setting Of civil jury cases:

Judge Zane yesterday made the following
setting Of civil jury cases
MONDAY APRIL H.
251-W, }. Bflleen Us. H. H. Dale; S. S Mark
ham, Rawlins & Critchlow
2i-Joseph Baumgarten VS.. Charles F. Fink:
5. y. Lewis Hamilton & Hartin.
OF he History company vs.. 5. F. Spencer
II. G. Ferguson.
TUESDAY. APRIL ~.
256-salt Lake CITY rs. Samuel H B. Smith
W. 9 He'll, o. w. Powers
25S-WesJern Newspaper Union vs. L. d.
kinney: 5. ii. Lewis, Hoge & burmester.
I'LL \. Abbott vs.. w. b. Andrew; S. ].
Kenyon Richards s. Moyle.
WEDNESDAY, APRIL -.
s65-EIias Mains vs.. james Doyle; W. L
Stewart. appeal
2do-E. c. Conn ct al. vs. George W. Far
NUN ct al. Stephens & Schroeder, p. LochIie,
2I0-Louis Schneider VS.. Edward w. Center
Ell a. hoge & Burmest- T, A. S Padgett.
THURSDAY. APRIL H.
26s-George NJ. Scott & Co VS.. A. Haddon et
al Bennett, Marshall g. Bradley, j. H Thomas
-l2-tred ). Hadra VS.. Utah National bank
I. = Lootbourow. Williams & VanCott
-is-George Thurgood VS.. +. II. Parsons; s.
W. Darke F. Honman, C. K. Gilchrist
FRIDAY APRIL Is.
2s3,H J; Leverich ct al VS.. W. H Cromar;
=. > Markham. y. w. Powers j. Post n
Isl; W. Farrell VS.. L. Q. Knowlton Ell
al; L. H. Armstrong, Hoge & Burmester.
29l-C- j. Hilgert vs.. Union Pacific Railroad
company ;. 5 MARKHAM, p. L. Williams.
MONDAY, APRIL Is.
3@-Charles A. stain VS.. 1. L. sackett ct al.
D, y. Lewis, Rawlins & Critchlow.
-e9-Jdmes Clowry vs. Western Union Tele-
graph company; Baldwin s. Tallock, L. r.
Rogers.
so -samuel Hefty vs. David Blackhurst
baldwin d Tatlock, Williams & Van Colt.
TUESDAY APRIL 10.
Franz Junck ct al. VS. s. W. Scott ct al
w; c. Hall. Arthur Brown Bowman s. Zipf.
-O-Salt Lake city VS.. William Lawrence
w. c. Hall, Powers & Hiles.
S9O-Mayer S. Aschheim VS.. David Smith; w
l. snyder, haighn & Anderson.
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 20.
255-N. L. Boyds ton VS. Union Pacific Rail.
Toao company; E. T. Hulanski p. L. VIII.
276-I. L. Cohn VS.. Earl d. GRAY: 6
Lewis S. McDowall.
2Sl-George W. Kellogg VS.. Jacob r Saclratt
ct al stephens s. Schroeder, RawlIns &
Crit.hlow. -
THURSDAY, APRIL 81.
396-Joseph RuiTatt VS.. Old telegram mining
company ct al; Shepard, Grove g. Shepard,
Marshall & Royle ~
S01-Harry Lamb vs.. John Gagan: LIE Grand
Young, w. c. Hall.
5i0-Victor D. Levy VS.. L. Sacl,ett of al .
. d. Lewis, Rawlns & Critchlow
FRIDAY. APRIL %.
2Sl-Adam Duncan VS.. Utah Central Railway
company arthur Brown, lie Grand Young
5lS-Salt Lake city VS.. Judson p Fowler. w
c. Hall, Wiley Brown w.
Sli-John X. Wilson vs.. Salt Lake CITY; s. Fl
Lewis, w. c. Hall
MONDAY, APRIL %.
26l-Philip Speihert vs. Henry w. Weller. 7
r.. Harris, c. +. Loofbourow
@55-tarm and Building company VS.. II p
Jason et a.; appeal: p. Lochrie, J. H Harris,
274-Salt Lake city vs. William Lawrence; W.
c. Hall, o. w. Powers.
TUESDAY, APRIL %
2si-Frank T. Coehrane VS.. CunoA Bussebe
stephens q Schroeder, Bennett, Marshall &
s0l-W. A Wood Moving & R. M. Co. vs. A
a. :,l FaJlerson' stephens Schroeder, c. +.
259-John J. Gibbons VS.. Isaac B. Hazel.
groves +. Z. Barker, w. C. Hall, Frank Pierce.
WEDNESDAY, APRIL q.
963-samusl P. Teasdel VS. Elias H. Parsons
Ell al; Marshall & Royle Frank Pierce
ogS-H, q: Burke Manufacturing company VS.
+. IL Wright; Stephens & Schroeder j. h.
SiS-John H Lloyd VS. Salt Lake City Rail.
road company; Richards & Moyle, Rawlins &
THURSDAY, APRIL -
Sl6-John T. Marks vs. W. H. Casady: ]. L.
Rawlins, S H. Lewis
S.'-W. H. Cassidy VS.. John r Marks; j. L.
Rawlins. s. II. Lewis
SIS. r. Marks ct al. vs.. Margaret Tuckett
ct 81; stephens & Schroeder, S H. Lewis and
o. w Powers
FRIDAY. APRIL 20.
S20-Afred j. Self VS.. Salt Lake Rapid Transit
company; c. w Hall, Williams & Van Colt.
52l-Edward f. Rich ct al. VS.. Il. n Winters
ct al; Frank Pierce. Richards & Movie.
3S2-P. ;: Bonesteel ct al vs. c. S. Ford ct
al; ). 5. Markham, Reilly & Kane