Grant County herald. [volume] (Lancaster, Wis.) 1850-1968, 1892-06-30
IN WOMAN'S BEHALF.
WOMEN AND LAW.
Canadian Opinion on Why They should
BE Allowed TO Enter the Profession.

I 4 Canadian Opinion on Why They should
BE Allowed to Enter the Profession.
Prejudice dies hard. even in the last
T decade Of the nineteenth century Wit
ness the attitude taken by some legal
+ lights in the Ontario assembly on the
/ debate on Mr. Balfour's bill 70 confer
I on the law society power 70 admit
/ women 70 the study of law What pos
sible reason can there be why women
4 should not be permitted 10 study law if
/ they wish To do 50? Is not jurispru-
/ dence one of the noblest the most pro-
found, the most broadening and elevat-
ing of all studies in which the human
mind can engage? BY what right,
/ human or divine, should the masculine
moiety Of our citizens take il upon
themselves TO say that they must have
a monopoly Of the study Of this en-
nobing science? The men. pure-mind-
ed, far-sighted creatures that they are,
are afraid, forsooth, that if women are
permitted to get a knowledge Of law,
they may wish to enter the courts TO
practice it, and in the course Of their
practice may some day come in contact
with something so pitchy as to be fit to
be handled only by their compeers of
the other sex. Is not such an argu-
ment as this a little too late in the day?
Has il not now been pretty well demon
strated that women may be safely
left to follow the dictates of
their own innate and cultured
sense of propriety, and that they are
quite as well qualified to Judge what is
modest and becoming for them as are
the average of their mentors Of the 9TH
er sex? Is it not, indeed. Just as posi-
bic if that the presence of the ladies at
the bar should have the effect OCCASION
ally Of modifying the character Of the
cross-examinations in certain classes Of
criminal cases, and of preventing the
putting Of unnecessary and outrageous
questions. neither justice nor modesty
would suffer from the charge?
But the question is not whether it is
desirable that women should practice
as barrlsters in all kinds of eases. 1t is
whether they shall be permitted to
share educational advantages which are
furnished at the public expense, and to
which women therefore contribute their
share Of taxation. 1t is also whether
women can be trusted to govern them
selves in accordance with their own
sense of propriety. or whether it is nee
cssary that they should be restricted
and hampered at every term by limita-
tions prescribed by the sex which has
hitherto had a monopoly of the law
making business, and which is only
just learning at this late day to use
that monopoly with anything like inst
and reasonable consideration for the
rights of the other sex.
We certainly are not particularly
anxious to see women advocates in the
civil and criminal courts, but we are
anxious that women should be at lib
erty to follow this or any other honor
able business or profession, If they
choose to do SO and can find a demand
for their services. We confess that we
have never before given much thought
to this particular phase of the question
of womans sphere, as it has never be-
fore, we believe, been made living
question in Canada. May we be par
doned if we add that the weakness Of
the objections raised against Mr. Bal
tours bill, even more than the cogency
of the reasoning in its support. have
convinced us of the essential justice of
the measure. Toronto Week.