Dziennik Chicagoski. [volume] (Chicago [Ill.]) 1890-1971, 1892-11-05

at least sixteen weeks, at least eight tweeks
of which attendance shall be consecutive,
some public day school IN the city, town
or district, in which he resides, which
time shall commence with the beginning
of the first term of the school year, or as
soon therea ter as due notice shall be
served upon the person having such
control of his duty under this act. For
every neglect cf such duty, the person
off nding shall forfeit to the use of the
pubic schools of such city or district,
sum not less than one nor more than
twenty dollars, and shall stand comm tied
until such fine and costs of suit are paid.
But if the person so neglecting, shall
show to the Subtraction of the board of
education or of directors, that such child
has attended for like period OF time, a
private day school approved by the beard
CT education or di ectors Of the city, town
or district in which such child resides, or
/, resides, or that instruction has otherwl-
Sc been given for like period of time to
such child, in the branche, commonly
taught in the public school; or that such
child has already acquired the branches
Of learning taught IN the public schools,
or that his physical or mental, condition
IS declared by u competent physician, is
such as TO render such attendance in
expedient and impracticable, then such
penalty shall not be incurred. Such fine
shall be paid when collected, to the school
treasurer of such city or township, to be
accounted for by him as other school mo-
ney raised for school purposes. But no
school shall be regarded as a school un-
der thi, act unless there shall be taught
therein in the English language, reading,
writing, arithmetic, history of the Unit
ed States and geography.
0 innych sekcyach, W kt6-
rych juz tylko podane So spo
,,y :, konania tel ustawy,
szczeg5iowiel ~ "'p'D',
nanny.
Zwracaihy tylko uwage nj:
rozdzia} powyaszy.
Kto nigdy ME mia} do czy-
nienia 2 prawuic1emi wyraze-
miami sic, z wyk}adem ustaw,
Z rozstrzygnieniami sqdowemi
i t. p, temu ma pierwszy rzut
Okla moze sic wydawac powyz-
sza ustawa niewinna. w wielu
okregach Stanu naszego repu-
blikanie jednakowoz juz udo-
wodnili, jaka to jest niewin-
nose tel ustawy.
Urzednicy, Radni szkolni,
skoro chca ustawy powyzszej
moga ko"zystat W slkaradny
spos6b ~ gdzieniegdzie ko-
rzystali: Prosze tylko uwazac
ma wyrazenie sic ,,skoro pre-
kona W spos6b zadowalniajacy
Rade i dyrektor6w". Kt6ryz
naty vista, zw}aszcza wr6g ka
tolicyzmu, powie, ze ,,zado-
wolni}o 60" to przekonanie?
Kt6ry przyzna, ze szko}a kato-
licka wype}nia warunki Gre
szta bardzo niedostatecznie O.
kreslone) powyzszej ustawy?
A jezeli takich przeciwnik6w
jest wiekszosc W Radzie szkol.
nej, to tez oczywlscle szko1a
parafalna lub prywatna W O.
wynn dystrykcie sic ME ostanie
! rodzice pod karami beda
zmuszeni posy}ac dziec; do
szko}y bezwyznaniowej.
Powiada ia ustawa: ,,zadnej
szko}y ME nalezy uwazat "a
szko}e ustawa ia objetej, W
kt6rej. -. i t. d." = ale ME
powiada, jaka szko}e mslsi SIG
uwazac "a dostateczna po
wyzsza us6aws objeta. Jakzez
obszerne pole do naduzyc!
Jake z tego moga korzystat i
jak juz gdzieniegdzie korzy'
stall wrogowie szka wyzna,
niowych. Gdybyz przynajmniej
powiedziano: ,Ustawa ia So
objete szko}y, W kt6rych ucza