The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1892-11-23

does not lose her security because the
mortgage constituting the security en-
braces the separate claim of n party who
participated with the m~OrtgageOr In perDe-
trating q fraud. 2. A mortgage executed
to secure a subsisting debt is supported by
a valuable consideration, but 1t Will not.
Is q general rule. prevail against one who
occu pies the favored position OF q bona
In no sense bona fide purchasers. They are
ordinary creditors, and against them Q
MORTGAGE to secure other creditors IS valid.
1878. Edith Hill ct al. VS.. Frank w. Pol
lard. Decatur q. c. Affirmed. Odds, j.
If the record proper clearly shows that the
Judgment rests on the good paragraph or
paragraphs there is no available error, since
the court can see from an inspection OF the
record that no harm was done the CON-
planning party. 2. The evidence supports
the finding.
1852. James Bell VS.. Sarah NJ. Bell. Tip
pecanoe G.. @. Rehearing denied.
1912. Edward ID. Magelln ct al. Va Mar
garet Roger ct al. Marion G.. G. Motion
to require appellee Reach to return assets
to clerk of the Circuit Court overruled.
Certiorari issued.
U
Room Hon. Napoleon b. Tavior. Jutya
VIM. II. Hays VS.. Augustus Bruner ct al;
on account. On trial by court
Elizabeth Wallace VS.. Jacob j. Wallace;
divorce. Dismissed.
Room s-Hon. Pliny w. Bartholomew. Judge.
Charlotte Rains vs. Rudolph Boettcher;
Henry Coburn We. Elroy S. Foster; me-
chanic's lien. Dismissed and costs paid.
- Ne,o Sttts Filed.
Jennie McCraun We. Thomas MoCraun;
Horace G.. study vs.. Benjamin Crane;
suit on note and to foreolose mortgage.
Ebert Russell ct al. vs.. Wayne L. Hs-
worth ct al; partition. Room !.
Christopher Zimmerman Va. Ella Zim-
norman; divorce. Room 2.
William jarvis VS.. Mercy Murray and
Lewis Holloway: suit on note. Demand.
Sl,C01. Room i.
William A. Taylor ct al. vs.. Mercy Muir.
ray ct al; suit on note. Room g
Lille Brown VS.. William H. Brown;
divorce. Room 8.
Glars parlsnd vs. William DArland;
Indianapolis Lumber Company vs. Samuel
T.. Evans; suit on note. Room 3.
IndianapolisL Lumber Company Va Samuel
T.. Evans: suit on note. Room ].
CIRCUIT COURT
Hon. Edgar A. Brown. Judge.
Louis Buerglin VS.. Milton p. Green's
Estate: claim. Allowed for Sass.
ar. sns0F Estate e. c Spsnoe. Allowed x.; Mi by oou r;
for S27.
]. H.. Harrington VS.. Milton p. Green's
Estate; claim. Allowed for $3.50.
Henry Coe va. Milton p. Green's Estate
claim. Allowed for S12.5Q
City of Indianapolis VS.. Michael Boylen;
selling liquor without license. Appeal
from City Court. Dismissed, by plaintiff.
Samuel M. Compton va. William III. Ham
mons; recel vershlp. Trial by court. Find
ing for plaintiff.
City of Indianapolis VS.. John w. Morse
peddling without license. Called for trial
Dismissed by plaintiff.
CRIMINAL COURT.
Hon. Mfllard T. Cox. Judge.
State vs. Robert Rankin; petit larceny
Defendant %withdraws former plea of moi
guilty and enters plea of guilty; released
on suspended sentence.
State VS.. Charles Davenport and ThomaI
Ferriter; grand larceny. Defendants with
draw their former pleas of not guilty anG
enter pleas of guilty; each fined $50 ant
costs and sentenced TO eight years i'm
prisonment in the state prison and dis
franchised for eight years.
state VS.. John Solen berg: petit larceny
Released on personal bond in the sum o
500 to obey the order of the court.
State VS.. Alva Logan; grand larceny. Re
leased on suspended Judgment.
State va. Charles Hunter; grand larceny
On trial by jury.