davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1892-10-18
$500. in Christmas Presents.
Competition open to Women Only.

For the best and effective article suggestion phrase for
popular in advertising the merit of Cevands Baking Powder
present OF 5000 will be gvn for the best $40 each and
for the ten rext best $Io EACH Experience writing advertise
ment not necessary. simple statement happy expression
even suggestion may prove to be the best.
Conditions :-Competiion
bAy All
awards will be made S ss possible
Baking Co.,
Some Facts that may give you hint suggestion:
C1eands baking powder pHen nd hossome.
doe vol con aor any other dlent
Evurlin N mg Is namo1o N Inc elaEl
Consume sknowcS exactly VIA eunR
is ne suongca o al pnc cream o tartar powders
Arands1tea a mi a a aheapng oneofa
ben MAJ wioherpo
. m han heornnr a.,
reports show 10 BE- FRS sani nihrtinf
S. oznm.nt buys rfr the Armyoh ohyrs
AUaycs ohero ilmrhoii
Mrs Mrs
an sir Derbrn npefut
The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1892-10-18
Boys
Clothing.

Perhaps your boy needs Suit Overcoat Hat for the
Columbus irsy parade No better time to get him Of
those S. Little Giant Suits S. Combination Suit the $40
Combination Suit and Overcoat
The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1892-10-18

Girls Like to
Look Bewitching,
even Little Ones.
The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1892-10-18

Children of a larger growth
can be fitted with anything
needed for the Parade, or
for the Winter.
The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1892-10-18

Make the Lads
Proud and Happy
For the Parade.
The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1892-10-18
Clothing.

The Little Women ought to be looked after we'll as the
Boys, possible little better If Gretchen other
garment needed is the time get fresh and for
the Parade
The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1892-10-18

"Fresh in his new apparel, proud and young"
The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1892-10-18

HALL q LYON. 203 WESTMINSTER ST.-e5
Our checking system makes mistakes in prescrp-
tioas impossible.
The Providence news. (Providence [R.I.]) 1891-1906, 1892-10-18

In our Ladies Cloak De-
partment all the Newest
Styles in Standard Goods at
Low Prices.
The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1892-07-07

at hand when the prospective purchaser
will reach decision what machine he will buy Var
manufacturers have flooded him with advertising circulars cards.
pretty pictures If his attention has been directed to the
makes machines the bewlldeed
confronted with the sublime paradox and distinct
BINDERS each of which the BEST in the World The strong
e the old Indian proverb, the weak must
and this te commentary human nature affords clue
tion the riddle. From facts calculate probabilities Here
facts:
The first machine to successfully cut grain in the field
Mccormick the admd type and PATTERN after which all other
best the Mccormick the leader number
nua sales Away the Mccormick It would be difficult matter
for establish the uthuness Of these claims the
of the reader The reputation of the Mccormick Company
wide the two hemispheres and legal documents would be
convincing than word If you in doubt the
almost universal popularity of the Mccormick do this Make In
qures Ask neghbors what harvester they
This evidence that the Mccormick Strong The
strong e but there's necessity for it. Standing
'front.' the Mccormick has nothing prevarcation
The during which the Mccormick Company dealt
with the agricuurs of the world has resulted the upbung
reputation which not afford to uy With less stake
others the hope
advantage but the Mccormick is building all time
that asked for other machine but always
purchase from get the Mccormick guarantee Do
put too great faith in advertsemen reading them strive
cate the whence they emanate Is that strong
or is 1t weak Recoect the rong & the weak must But
better than to have too great faith advertising
first of all faith yourself To the fact that farmers becoming
expert judges of machinery DUE measure the
able Of the Mccormick this and to the fact that
constantly studying the needs of the and constantly
experimenting and mprov1sg the machine of Steel We aim to
make it leader its class The verdict of
succeed.
The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1892-07-07
Mccormick 5 MaEc|hlless M, !! /,

i Kng OF It at the head because
~ aoapted to the general requirements of moving machine Our
05ee movers are for special work being
Big with wide bar valuable ac
e to 6en those VINO have vast and McCormick
9 % Spe? merit chiefly for the facility with which may
WneI IS necessary do small jobs frequently the case on
the suburban home orchard lawn roadside etc. the ideal
ol oenoe power In these three together with the old
e 1ayore McC0mcs No. 3, the BEST results Of me-
fnanc research and experiment this Of agricultural indus
In me oret space at command here is impossible to de-
e eaeh OF the three machines minute We ask you to call upon
INC agent and get copy Of catalogue You
each of %ow uene g no from its learn the details
% critical examination Let briefly suggest Of the
% WI" he BEST farmers the world prefer other make
ct exant One Of the combined
ao compactne OF its main Frame feature readily apre
be 1se e VINO have used the himsy built
npe g e nor oo olea thereby causing the hag bind You viii
e 0od enects IN the with which draw the ma
. men we say the Mccormick the lgtes draft mower
@ % we say what we stand ready Forty thou
bought this machine last year. and their choice was NOT
aae hastily Before buying they thought the No the best
e e now they know it. All loud their praise Of the foot
u s We ask compare lift with those Of
mprorsn our plan floating the
over the usual methods Our simple gearing: plan Of
qeng g the long tnan the easy riding and
heT FEATURES possessed only by the Mccormick are tho tns
i''' contribute to it's unequaed popularity.
The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1892-07-07
da !; Purssll ey, James M.

da T. ,Pursalla Az Ja.,o. M "a
E Iesss p,,r.al, aaa + Purselley and
i - cb;ldrn s,e ana AZ AZ claiming TO
selley deeeased.1 FronE Psrr svis 3e,a; VT
;nn II he -, asuI,; hdnnk IalroG, lc1alm
Parrot niaco ntirh M S J - ~ w.
ceasedi and Rartha porrot wy ~ NY; ~.
Renhen st ROGERS ava parba, ..1s M wl..' ii
his wi "a. GeorSe " N Fad D o., vs. Mar
i Reed hia w;ia. Iohr " d. pan ~
Mary a. Slammer. widow az iohn
Slammer. deceased. Fila 7 shat1ar
widow ~ Wa.Isy Nv .I dao 90 Snan aei
John "A Shaffer' her hynshsnd ca Gsnro eI r
Sfntt clair,i,, - 10 = usoise ~ -.
surviving husband of Eliaa sto ntu fn r,ae
Thaverl. Anna EI;yohath stn ST. l anS
Willie IA. stntt cla;1ninn !" oi 10 a ,ha
children Of Eliza Stotf' decoasai
David w. Thayer claiminp - La fha
son OF David Thaver. deeeased and Me s
Thayer, his wife; ] James M. Wallace and
baugh)and Samuel Walker. her hnshand.
Fred. G. Wenz, William n. Ashtnn
Henry G. Adams, Aaron P. Abbott
John r. Autram. LEROY P. Anderson
Aaron A. Baxter, Robert i. Butts. Sam.
uel "A. Capehart, Oliver W. Coonrod.
Andrew J. Coots, William T. Dotson'
franklin X Dillier, Frederick Domitz
George w. Dickinson, VIM. S. Fitzger.
d1O, tOSOTk6 IL. fIQOlGV. David II
Frank, Allen Graves. John " Glenn
Thos. G. Gregg William A. Goldstone
Rachel B. Gilbreath, widow of John P.
Gilbreath, deceased; John IT. Good.
John Grics, Houston c. Cover, David
H. Hopkins, Jesse Hinkle. Char
lotte Hobbs, widow of iohn Hobbs:
William III. Hinton, William HASTINGS
Melchisedu Ham, Jonathan Harwood'
William H. Haley Sanford {. Ives.
Samuel Jaco bs, John b. King, benjamin.
F. Kennedy, George B. King, William
Lacy, Charlie, H. Lance, John s. La
baugh, James d. McElwain. Margaret
Morris, formerly Margaret Price. widow
ofDayid r. Price; George w. Matthews.
Theodore Monet. Philip Mathena Abra,
ham B. Miller, George A. Morris. Will
lam Noakes. George Parsley, George Pur-
selley, William I. Perks. Francis r.
Payne, Frederick Rose. Robert II
Rownd, Chauncey w. Rickerd. Charles
+. Rohland. Isaac T. Richie, Sebern
The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1892-07-07
his wife; James Kelly and Dora
his wife; Elisha Kelly and Mary

his vile; James Kelly and Dora
his wife; Elisha Kelly and Mary
his vile sarah Kelly (unmarried), Betty
Kelly tunmarriedl claiming to DO
daughtsrs OF VIM. Kelly, deceased;
Mitchell Merrill and Sarah, his wife; T..
=. Upohurch and M. @. his wife, M. c.
claiming to be daughter and heir Of
james Hogan, deceased; Thomas Pulling
and Lucy M, his wife. claiming to be an
heir OF Thona Pulling. deceased; Eu-
gsnia Y. Peck (nee Horny and John M,
her husband, claiming to be an heir OF
VIM. r. Horn. Jr., deceased; George W.
starnes and Martha A., his wife; Preston
a. Selyedge( bachelor) N ary Van Deven-
ter and Lester NJ. her husband. claiminr
to be an heir Of Merrill L. il cath, dscsas-
ed; Leroy G. Walters and Ellen his wife.
claiming to be an heir. of Amanda J.
Walters, deceased; Amanda Wood vivid
owl. claiming to be . daughter Of Merrill
!. Heath, deceased; Harrison L. Wheat
and Louisa 9 his wifs; ThonlasYoung-
bis wife; Wi liam y. Antle Elisha Bell,
John 9. Bagley, Frank Bobo, sJchn T.
Black, Andrew ]. Baker, J ohm III. Chan
dlcr, Thomas ]. Carter, Pin kney H. Cor
gan, Walter II. Campbell. Isaiah Fanch-
CT, Acy i: Gault. Willis Gray, MERRILL.
Heath, William r. Horn, Jr., David Har-
ris, James Hogan, George +: Jones, Will
Lewis, James Lawrence, George Meyers,
James A. Mathis, Frederick w. Miller,
William n. II. Mott, John G. Phillips,
Thomas Pulling, David Pierce, S,las Ris-
ley, Eli Raney, Bradley w. Smith. James
4. Stanley, Lemuel w. Stockton, Will
Jam Shigley, Clinton f. Starnes Richard
Tucker. Jonothan Tice. Alfred Van
slyke, Elijah Virgins, Emelne Wilt
ans, widow ofIsaac Williams, deceased;
Thomas. III. Wells, VIM D. Wharton,
Stephen w. Williams, Amanda J. Wal
ters, James B. Willhite, Lafayette Will
hite, James M. Young: also all other
persons or parties unknown claiming
any right, title estate, lisnor interest in
the real estate described in the COM
plant herein, Defendants.
The State of Minnesota to the above
named defendants: You and each of yo
are hereby summoned and required t
answer the complaint of the plaintiffs i
the above-entitled action, which is on fiji
in the office of the clerk ofthesaid court {
his office at the village OF Princeton
Minnesota, and to serve a copy of vol
answer to said complaint on the subscriber
Davis, Kellogg g. Severance, at their otfic,
in the city Of st. Paul in the county {
Ramsey and said state within twenty day
after the service of this summons upon vol
exclusive Of the day of such service; and,
you fail to answer the said complaint with
in the time aforesaid, the plaintiffs in tn
action will apply to the court Tor the reli,
demanded in the complaint.
Dated April 18th, A. d. 1892.
DAVIS KELLOGG g. SEVERANCE,
CLAP & MCCARTNEY and
Il + FLANDRAU. SQU1RFs d CUTcHEoN
Plaintiffs Attorneys, st. Paul, Min,
The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1892-07-07
Mccormick Folding Daisy Reaper.

The DAISY prime favorts wherever used
correct principles This that light draft gearing
simple The oadfaced and hg-rake standard are
valuable improvements The device for regulating the
CUES to suit heavy light not be highly
Both the platform and seat be folded up thus permitting this
pass through narrow gates You change the
f g .n1 We guarantee ante the Daisy to do better Both
reaper made Your Mccormick agent this machine See it. t
speaks for ITSELF ~ ~
The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1892-07-07
NOTICE OF LIS PENDENs.
STATE OF MINNESOTA,
SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT. So

Maggie Bennett, his wife; William II.
Buckner and martha J. Buckner, his wife;
Rose l.. Bailey and George w. Bailey,
her husband; James Case, Edward E.
Cross, and Emma Cross, his wife; John
Cramer, Robert M. Coles and Margaret
Isaac Doty and Doll Doty, his wife; Ed
win A. Dopp and Francis Dopp, his wife;
Henry R. Ellis,and Elizabeth J. Ellis, his
wife; Ina R. caves and William Eaves,
her husband; Joseph NJ. God
dard and Elizabeth A. God
dard, his wife; Martin Green, An
drew Casual and Barbara Casual, his
wife; William B. Harris and Kate L.
Harris, his wife; George w. Holloway,
Elijah Harris widower), James H. Hath
away and Corine E. Hathaway, his wife;
Charles b. Hughes and Mary
J. Hughes, his wife John
G.. Judge, Frances L. Judge (wife),
Austin T. jerks, Susan R. Kills and
James A. Kills, her husband; Henry H.
Lewis, and Sarah J. Lewis. his wife; John
Adlia r. Lawrence, Robert Love, and
M. c. Love, his wife; James Mulvey
| (widower), John A. Mott and Sarah e.
Mott, his wife; Cyril w. Mott, and Leath-
ey G.. Mott, his wife; Thomas
r. Pearman and Sabert e. Pearman, his
wife, Henry w. Phelps. John E. Phelps
(widower), David Reynolds and Sarah
REYNOLDS, his wife; John w. Thomas
and Titham Thomas, his wife; Susannah
G. Vincent Widow, Leonidas West,
Jason l.. Wright and Mary J. Wright,
his wife; Warner and JenetteWar-
ner, his wife; Polly Afford Widow,
William G. Best. John NJ. Baer and
Libbie c., his vile; Clara Chandler
fnl OF pNS,,c, ~ hn 1,o 0f T0h w, II
Chandler), Edward ]. Chandler, (un-
married), George B. Chandler (un-
married), claiming to be the heirs of
John III. Chandler dec; Adeline E.
Covell (nee Heath) and George G. her
husband, Claiming to be child OF
Merrill Heath); Samantha Costello and
Thomas her husband Claiming to be all
heir Of Merrill Heath); Susan Coker (nee
Kelly)and JamesL, her husband; Calvin
J. Davis and Sarah L., his wife; William
T. Dawson (widower), Phebe Green and
Albert her husband, claiming to
bea daughter of Merrill L. Heath, dec;
Charles r. Goodenow and Maria R.,
his wife; Louisa Harris, claiming to be
the widow of David Harris; e. W. Har-
ris, r. L. Harris, and Rose A., his wife,
claiming to be heirs of David Harris, de-
ceased; William Hogan and Catherine,
his wife, claiming to be an heir OF James
w;fe rio; mino to be nm heir If lanes Ho-
pan: Mal;nda HOGAN claiming to he the
Sw;dow IF Gan,es Hocan. Sninman NJ
Heath and Harriet h;s "; fe. Charles
Heath and Alice A his wife. claiming
to he children Of Merrill Meath. dec:
Elizabath Horn. claiming to be the
widow nf Vim r Horn n.
dac Thomas Horn and Martha
his wife: Nancy HYDE and Joseph NJ.
her hnshond c}ain,;ne to he : danob ter
The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1892-07-07
Perhaps You Don't

Need bnder desire to leave their grain loose bund
AS the machine best adapted to this purpose build the
The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1892-07-07

Frederick Wey F. c. A. Denk
man, The Rock leland Lumber Com
pany, George w. Cable, G. Lamb & Sons
Company, and Laird-Norton Co.. Plain
tif1s,
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1892-01-15
The Lesson Not Lost on Him.

From the Chicago Tribune.
He settled himself back in his chair with Q
self-satisfied air and said:
Things have changed some since we were
married, haven't they. Nary"
"a great deal, Joe,' she replied quietly.
"The first year was pretty hard" he went on.
81 didn't make any more than enough to pull
us through. But told you then I'd get up,
and have"
Yes" she admitted, ''you have. You've
made it much easier for me financially"
And I've worked hard to do it," he said,
with some pride. I've practically worked
night and day"
She nodded and he continued:
I'm do better yet. Mary. III have You even
more comfortable than now"
lyon will if you keep on working q you
have worked" she said, "but--"
But what, Mary
smile. IF you quite understood the clergy
man."
s.The-why. Mary"
1.-THE clergyman who married u.s."
'sWhy. what have done?" he asked suddenly.
Strengthening up in his chair.
Nothing wrong, suppose, Joe," she replied
in the same quiet way, but il has seemed
sometimes-jus: fancy of mine, perhaps-it
has seemed though you thought YOU had
married the Office. 1t sees more Of you than
than
She stopped. It wasn't necessary to saw any
more. It was only necessary to kiss him to
show that 1t was not in u purely fault 6ndine
spirit that she spoke, and she did that. And
the lesson that money-well, the lesson was not
lost on him.
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1892-01-15
a I OCULAR CASE.
Commander Smith Before an Examining
Board for Promotion.

Commander Smith Before an Examining
Board for Promotion.
Commander Frederick Smith appeared TODAY
before a special examining board at the NAVY
Department for examination for promotion.
The board consists of Rear Admiral Mccain.
the president of the regular board; Commodore
Stanton and Capt. Selfridge. 1t was necessary
to order this detail, as Commander Smith ranks
two of the members of the other board. The
case is an interesting one and the outcome is of
moment.
Commander Smith is now the next eligible
for promotion to be captain, to fill the va
cancy caused by the recent death of
Capt. R. L. Bradford. Commander Smith
has been on waiting orders for fifteen years.
His case is a peculiar one. There
has been o strong feeling among his
fellow officers against him for many years.
and an old record has been brought up
against him dating from 1883, when he
was tried for scandalous conduct, the charge
arising from an alleged attempt to defraud his
creditors. He was convicted, but the sentence
Of dismissal was committed by President
Arthur to years suspension. Successive ad-
ministrations were applied to for duty for him,
but it was never granted and he has remained
on waiting orders for fifteen years.
Now, by the death OF Capt. Bradford, he be-
comes eligible for promotion. The present ex-
amining board will be called upon TO pass on
his qualifications, mental, professional and
moral and the result will be looked for with
interest in naval circles.
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1892-01-15
RUSSIAN RELIEF.
The House Democratic Majority Proposes
to Pass . Complimentary Resolution.

1he mouse DemOcratic MAJORITY Proposes
to Pass . Complimentary Resolution.
The majority of the House are greatly en-
barrassed by the Russian relief resolution
which still hangs about their necks. They are
very anxious that this action in refusing an ap-
preparation shall not be construed by the Rus
sian government as an indication Of lack Of
friendly feeling and sympathy.
Still there are enough who are opposed on
principle to the appropriations of public
moneys for such purposes to prevent recon-
sideration Of the action taken several days
ago. 1t is asserted that had no such
resolution been introduced the people
by private contribution would have before this
time contributed generously and the desired
relief would have been secured through the
Red Cross Society. But the doubt in which
the public are left by the situation OF the mat
ter in Congress interferes with the
work, and the fact that Congress has
touched the matter at all without accomplish
ing anything is felt to have the country subject
to the suspicion OF q lack Of generosity.
1t is proposed, therefore, to withdraw the
original proposition and to pass "a resolution,
with preamble. reciting what is being done
sympathy and friendship for the Russian people
but declaring that it is against the principles
Of our institutions to appropriate money from
the public funus for this purpose. and at the
same time expressing confidence in the gener-
osity OF the people OF this country being equal
to the occasion.
This, it is believed, would give encourage
ment to the efforts of the Red Cross Society
and make clear the attitude of the House.
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1892-01-15
THE SEQUEL TO A SCANDAL
A well-known Business Man sued 10
Alternating q Wife's Affections

Papers were filed this afternoon in the Cir
cult Court in a case that promises to bring out
some sensational testimony when it comes to a
hearing Mr.. John ". Walker, Waterman in
the fire department, brings suit against Vim.
T. Easton, a well-known business man, charg-
ing him with alternating the affections Of his
wife, Mrs. Alice VI. Walker. There are three
counts in the charge and $4,000 is demanded
as damages in each count.
The first count charges Easton with unlawful
relations with Mrs Walker beginning July II,
1891. and continuing up to the present time.
The second count charges intimate relations at
a house. $40 Eutaw street. Baltimore ana that
since that time the relations have been main
tanned, Mrs Walker being known under the as
sumed name OF Mrs Owens and the two passing
themselves of as man and wife.
In the third count Walker asks $50, 600 dam
ages for the loss OF his wifes services, alleging
that she has deserted and left him for some
time past and that during that time he has
been deprived of her services and is other
wise greatly injured
The papers were filed by A. A. Lipscomb and
Henry L. Woodward, attorneys for the plsin-
tiff Walker a member OF the fire den IT
nent until he lost a leg by the fall Of fire
reel and since then has been employed as a
Waterman. He has three small children.
Easton is 4 widower.
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1892-01-15
THE HOUSE RULES.
Progress Made by the CommIttee-Awaitfnr
the Speakers Recovery.

Progress Made by the Committee-Awaitfnr
the Speakers Recovery.
1t is doubtful whether Speaker Crisp will be
able to attend the sessions of the House next
week without great risk to his health Until he
resumes his duties, however, there can be no
definite line Of policy understood. Under pres
ent conditions any sort of proposition may be
brought to the front with all the appearance of
authority without the leaders Of the party gen.
orally knowing anything about it.
The Speaker necessarily is not giving anv
attention to those matters and the committee
on rules is not In a position to fulfill its func.
tons. so that the House is running along in an
easy sort OF way without rules or set policy. 1t
is not thought any special harm or inconven
fence will result from this. but as long as this
state OF things lasts great deal that is done
must be OF doubtful Significance as regards the
general policy Of the party.
QUESTION OF QUORUM.
There is some difference of opinion among
the democrats interested in the preparation of
the new rules as to the question of a quorum
OF the committee of the whole. Mr.. Catchinps
Is said to be in favor of preserving the rule Of
the Fifty first Congress making 100 quorum
in committee, while Mr.. McMillin prefers that
this quorum should be the same as the quorum
OF the House. This is probably the only mat
ter as to which there Is any disagreement and
1t is unknown how the Speaker feels about it.
AS TO pILAToRY MOTIONS.
1t is probable that some provision will be
made to check dilatory motions, but the
Speaker will not be given the right to deter
mine when motions are made for the purpose
of delay.
The provision will probably be that certain
motions may not be made more than a certain
number of times pending the transaction OF
! some business The provision for legis!a;io n
on appropriation pills In the interest Of econ
omy is almost certain Of adoption. -