Maryland independent. [volume] (Port Tobacco, Md.) 1874-current, 1892-09-02
$4,000
@-'2 Reward
For above information; this offer il open
until January Isl, 1898.
WOLFF & RANDOLPH hila6elphis.
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.

III he Circuit Court for Charles County.
Glymont improvement and Excursion Com
pany VS.. Washington N. Toler.
The object OF this suit is TO procure decree
qbieti1g the title of the plaintiff in and to all
the land owned IN said county by it at ely
mont on the Potomac river, and 10 compel the
defendant to deliver up to the plaibtitf GER tain
stock OF the Upper Glymont Improvement aud
Excursion Company and TO accept in lieu
thereof the stock of the plaintiff, as agreed tc
by him. The bill of &C mplaint alleges that
the Upper Glymont Improvement and Excur-
sion Company, was duly incorporated under
the public general laws Of the State of Mary
land, and that il bec,me chartered by the Cir
cult Court for Charles county, Md. with Its
office at Glymont in said county, and as such
it became the owners Of two tracts Of land in
said county, one continuing 450 acres and the
other $40 acres, and fully described in the
deed hereinafter mentioned, and being so in
corporated, it issued about Ga shares of its
stock to the defendant. That its operations
being limited by its charter, 1t was Resolved
in meeting assembled by all IT'S stockholders,
on April 9TH, 1888, TO surrender its charter,
Incorporate itself anew, and with that view
the said, the Upper Glymont improvement
ahd Excursion Company did on the lin Of
April, 1888, surrender its charter and transfer
its franchises, &C., to the plaintiff who, OF re-
cord in said county, bad received new CHAR
ter dated March 18th, 1883, AMI that at once
thereafter the Upper Glymont improvement
and Excursion Company did convey by deed
dated April nth, 1888, all the said (2l tracts
of land to the plaintiff corporation Of record
on Liner J. S. T., No iOho 4s, one of thu
Land Record Books of said county. That the
plaintiff company did Issue its stock 10 all thu
stockholders OF the Upper G'5mont improve
meat and Excursion Company in exchange iol
the stock then held by them rs agreed upor
before said surrender earept TO the debt who
did assent 10 all of the said acts aud agree Il
accept the stock of the plaintiff company II
lieu OF tile same then held 10y him. but there
after refused to comply with the said agree
ment aud b. sunhry assertions, eiaiins, re
ports and acts declared that the said strrende
transfer, and Incorporation were made ahehf
without his assent aud did Tins tlnos clJu'
on the title OF the plaintiff to The said tw'
tracts Of land so MS above decided TO them an'
DEFY the exercise OF any power u, them oyel
the same or IN any manner with Ct over III
afi airs Of the plaintiff That the delei dant !
Il non-residuut and refuses 10 deliver III TO tn
pl4intiif his stock for cancellation and reissu
Of its stock as agreed 10 him
1t is thrVeupon, thls 2nd day of August
1892, ordered BY the Circuit Court for Charlie
G county, in equity, that the pl..inii1, lT cans
ing a cop, Of this urder 10 ueins,red in sou
new spaurr published in Charles county, one
c in each OF tuar successive weeks. helote Ia
5th day OF September, ls9A give nsIics . III
! SAID absent defendant, d Ine OBJECT AID su'
|, stance OF this mill, warning, mn 10 appeal Il
Z this court. iu person or by solicitor, on or be
lore the 2lst Day OF SEPTEMBER 10 saoN cause
if any he has, Why II decree ought not 10 y
passed as prayed.
s j. SAMUEL TURSERClerk
o. Ct Tor Charles Co,snty.
T. True copy-Tesi:
4 j. SAMUEL TURNER, Clerk
aug set