The Democratic advocate. [volume] (Westminster, Md.) 1865-1972, 1892-06-18
ORDER OF PUBLICATION
NO. 2627 EQUITY.
In the Circuit Court for Carroll CouD,v
John T. Raitt vs q Ho,zo

-N-' LSOll L.
In the Circuit Court for Carroll County.
John T. Raitt VS.. C. Hanson Raitt .,
The object of the Petition of Mo-
Raitt, Executrix Of C. Hanson Rat, Jane
Carroll county, Maryland, deceased s ia.e OF
this cause, is to obtain an order oS ~ 10
subrogating the petitioner, as the Loco, OOar
resentative of said C. Hanson Rail, rep
creditors of Nathan Raitt, late Of Cs ~ tne
county, deceased, and requiring the tr u~sioA
in the above caute to pay over 10 her Ns 80
deducting expenses and proper comm;s.; ai'ef
the balance of the undistrbnted proceed >,
sale from the real estate. uS OIL
The Petition states that on the 3Otb A..
April, 1888, certain Nathan Raitt d;oj VI
Carroll county, Maryland, interstate and ~ ~
married, seized Of certain real estate in W, WI
county that said real estate was enlS 5A ~
c. Hanson Raitt and g. w. Cranstsr ~. w
tees, appointed by decree of the conr. N =:
Sc, 1880, and that the sum of S., 1877 IN -,
said sales were distributed among the heir
at. law OF SAID Nathan, leaving the undistrihn
ted sum of Sl,O20.00, in the hands oC tLa
trustee in the cause; that letters of admin
istratlon were granted to the said c. Hanson
Raitt by the Orphans Court of CarSo1
Nathan, who qualified, and entered unon ,ba
duties of administration thereof: tba, Tue y
the month of March, 1892. said G. Han,a -
Raitt, died in Carroll county, leaving I viii
by which he devised and beaueathed oil H.
property to his wife, the petitioner, and sn'
pointed her executrix Of said will: that IL
applied for and obtained from the OrpbanS'
Court of Carroll county, letters testamentsrv
on said will, and as such executrix settled ~
the 18th day of April, 1892, the first and 6n"i
account of her husband, as administrator NJ
said Nathan Raitt, from the books and naners
left by said deceased; that said settlement
shows balance due her husbands estate of
81, l14.85, after accounting and charging him
with the entire assets and personal estate or
his decedent; the petition prays that tbs
said undistributed proceeds of said real estate
now in the hands of the trustees in the cause
to-wit: 100000, may be paid over to the
petitioner to make good in part, the balance
due the estate of her testator, from the estate
of said Nathan; that the heirs.at.law or
said Nathan, at the time of the filing or
the Bill, were said G. Hanson Rai,t. q
brother; John I. Raitt, nephew; Henry
C. Raitt, nephew; Charles H. Raitt, a
nephew; Laura c. Raitt, a neice; Elizabeth
L. Eye, a neice; Richard W. Simpson, a
nephew; Thomas W. Simpson, a nephew;
Edward B. Simpson, a mel hew; George R
Simpson, a nephew; Sophia S. Crapster,
wife of said G. w. Crapster, and Lurenno A,
Aiken, neice; hat since said bill was
filed said c. Hanson Raitt has died as aiore
said, also said John 7. Raitt and Sophia S.
Crapster; that said John T. left an adult
daughter, Ella, married to Rev. -
Sherwood; that said Charles II. Raitt.
Laura c. Raitt, Elizabeth L. Eye, George R.
Simpson, Lurenno A. Aiken and Ella Sher-
wood are non residents, living beyond the
State of Maryland. That Henry C. Raiu is
living in Baltimore City; Richard W. Simp-
son and Thomas W. Simpson, in Frederick
county, and Edward b. Simpson and Gusta-
vus W. Crapster are living in Carroll county,
Maryland.
1t is thereupon adiudged and ordered by
the Circuit Court of Carroll county, in Equity,
this 10th day of May, in the year eighteen
hundred and ninety-two, that the petitioner,
by causing copy of this order to be inserted
in some newspaper published in Carroll
county, Maryland, once in each of four sue.
cessive weeks before the 10Th day Of June,
next, give notice to the said Charles h.
Raitt, Laura G. Raitt, Elizabeth E. Eye,
George X. Simpson, Lurenno A. Aiken and
Ella Sherwood who are nOn-residents OF the
State of Maryland, absent defendants, of the
object and substance of said petition, and
warn them to appear in this Court IN person,
or by Solicitor, on or before the 9Th day o.
July, 1892 to answer said petition and show
cause, if any they have, why decree ouch
not TO pass as prayed.
CHARLES b. ROBERTS,
True Copy,-Test:
my2I st BENZ. F. GROUSE, Clerk.