San Antonio daily light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1886-1907, 1892-04-20
THE COURTS.

In Judge Noonan's court the follow
ing Judgments were had:
Texas National bank OF San An
tonic vs.. Jas. w. Maddox, debt, judg-
ment for plaintiffs, tor costs.
Texas National bank OF San An
tonic VS. r. H. McCracken, gsrnish-
ment, judgment for defendant, for
costs and SIS attorneys fees.
Texas National bank of San An
tonic VS.. From terizo Silver Mining
and Milling company, garnishmeut,
judgment for defendants, for costs
and SIS attorneys fees.
Hager & Moth vs.. Collins x Peck,
punishment Judgment for defendant
with $50 for attorneys fees.
Joseph Baum & Co, vs Thos. ii.
ABBOTT, appeal from justice court. for
defendant, plant tiff excerpts and gives
notice OF appeal.
Francis Smith Il Co, vs.. Thomas
Tinsley, on promissory note, for plain.
tiff, defendant and plaintiff both ex-
cert and give notice of appeal.
The following cases were dismissed
for want of prosecution:
w. A. Howell vs.. r. G.. Ried, trans
ferred from 37th district.
Smith & Redmon VS.. A. n. Steagall,
ct al, transferred from 37th district.
San Antonio National bank VS.. H.
L. Dignowity, ct al, transferred from
S7th district.
John Gimble vs.. Ed MeRae, appeal
from justice court.
Twenty seven cases were contin-
ued.
In Judge Noonan's court today the
following business was transacted:
Defendant Vernon given ten days
in which to file statement of facts in
the Rahm case.
Geo. w. Russ was appointed in
place OF w. c. Roba!ds to examine
county finances.
In Judge Noonan's court the follow.
ing new suits were filed:
The Fidelity and Casualty company
vs j. n. Chapman ct al, for debt.
The state OF Texas VS.. G. II. Huer.
mann ct al, judgement nisi.
Nancy G. Aarrison ct al. VS.. David
Kirk wood ct al, to try title and for
damages.
It. w. Treanor VS.. d. l.. Riley ct al,
promissory note.
North & Taylor vs.. Kaighn & Hor-
ner accepted and protested draft.
In Judge Kings court Henry FL
mendOrf ct al filed suit against Bexar
county for debt to the amount of
81 400 for gravel aud other things fur
nished the county.
The following judgments were
rendered by Judge Noonan this
morning:
Reagan Houston. assignee vs. E.
Niggli, on promissOry note and debt,
for plaintiff.
Reagan Houston, assignee VS..
Lum & Fry, on promissory note and
debt, for plaintiff.
Fred. Binz vs.. H. n. Binz, damages,
for defendant, each party to pay costs.
James NJ. May VS.. T. P. Mccall, j.
w. White, ct al, damages, Judgment
by agreement.
In the case of c. r. Buekner vs.. A.
Moeckel, ct al, appeal from justice
court, defendants motion to quash
affidavit and writ Of sequestratio i
was sustained.
The following cases were dismissed:
George G. Lester, for swindling. un-
der $40, and three cases against Lester
for forgery.
Two judgment nisi cases against
George Mitchell were set aside.
One against Geo. Whitney was also
set aside.
Sandy Foster made a motion for
new trial, which was overruled.
A man named w. M. Williams, ar.
rested for assault with intent to kill
and murder, gave recognizance In the
sum of 81 900. DR.. A. Graves is his
surety. -
There will be no court tomorrow
legal holiday.
e Yesterday Justice Adam fined G
Pals $40 for abusive language.
A. p. Rivas, agent for Goldfrank
Frank & Co. vs.. Lucy Collins, forci Die
entry and Getainer, writ of restitu ton
was ordered. o..
Gulf, West Texas aud Pacific Rail.
way company vs.. F. E. Burr, on con
tract.
VIM. NJ. O'Brien, administrator, VS.
Frank Sehelcher, on promissory note
Leopold Weel & Co. VS.. Samuel &
Roseman, account and note.
Ernestine Peters ct al. VS.. Jacot
Rickert, trespass to try title.
The case against Sanford Webster
for THEFT under $40, and Isidor Moline
for burglary, were dismissed.
Today is the last day of service IL
this court