Los Angeles herald., 1891-11-05
THE COURTS.
United States District Court.
U. S. VS.. Itata-Submitted.
Superior Court.

DEPARTMENT ONE.
Clear calendar.
DEPARTMENT two
Sweet ct al. vs. Cox-Ten days time allowed
Dominguez VS. Tononi ct al--on trial.
Walch VS.. Grape and Wine Growers Assn
TESTIMONY, heard motion for non-suit submit
Est. &. L. TopliH-Contd to Nov. 10th
Est. John NJ. Permar-Acc't allowed.
Est NJ. W. McGee-Contd to Nov. l1th
Est. stuart tminors-Application for guard'n ms
granted.
DEPARTMENT THREE.
Libby VS.. Ellsworth ct al.-Ten days add time
granted pllh to file amended complaint
Pinney VS.. Lyons ct al.-Same order.
Pinney VS.. Lyons ct al.-Same order
Pinney VS.. E!lsworth-Sam order.
Pinney VS.. Ellsworth-Same order.
Bixel VS.. Guilerton ct al.-Judgment for
plaintiff on foreclosure.
Maddox, admir-. VS.. Russell ct al. On trial.
DEPARTMENT FOUR.
Pacific Bank VS.. Pile, extrx-Cont'd for ses-
sion.
Abbottvs. Perry ct al-off calendar.
Mahoney VS.. Mahoney-of calendar; stated
as settled.
NJ. Z. Frankel VS.. VIM. O'Connell-Judgmen
for plaintiff, 1863.
King VS.. Beach-Decree signed.
M Kremer, executor, VS.. d. Albert Earl ct al
that action be dismissed with costs as directed
by the supreme court. tssA
DEPARTMENT FIVE. s4sf
Geise vs. Erbes--Ordered that pltf recover
costs up to filing, of dei'dts answer, and that
defdt recover balance of costs from pl'tff
G. A. jerks VS.. J. L. GuilletOn-Decree of
Mrs. /. Lee vs. N. Abbott-cause dismissed
In re insolvency A. J. viele--order permit
ting Cornelius Connell TO foreclose mortgage
granted and signed - rfait
Burnett VS.. Burnett-Decree signed.
Abstract 4 Title Ins. Co. VS.. O'Day--Judg-
ment for defendant 3@-
DEPARTMENT SIX. on
j. S. Kimball VS.. J. NJ. Taylor ct al--Arg oed
and submitted.
Sterling VS.. Smith-Settement of bill of ex-
ceptions cont'd to Nov 10Th. ..ns.t s.4.
Hermann VS.. c. Won der Kuhlen-On trial.
Today's Calendar.
SUPERIOR CoURT-DEPARTMENT ONE.
People VS.. Sier Yuen-Trial.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
Est H NJ. Mitchell-Pet for sale of realty.
Est OF J. a. Hunter-Probate of will.
Est OF Nj. Bolan-Pet for sale pers property.
Est and guard of NJ. .Froehlinger-Appt of
Est of G. d. Ripley-Acct and dist.
Est of NJ. II. Kelly-Acct and dist.
Est of g. r.. Criswell-Letters of admin.
Flahant VS.. Crank, receiver.
Dominique VS.. Tononi.
DEPARTMENT THREE.
Genther VS.. Frederick.
Hill VS.. S G. V. r T. Ry. Co.
Mascarel VS. CliHton ct al.
Maddox admr VS. Russell ct al.
DEPARTMENT FOUR.
Templest Cable Ry Co VS.. Hellinan ct al.
DEPARTMENT FIVE.
Van Steenburg VS. L A., L. and G. Ry Co.
l.. y. Ter Ry Co. VS. Jacoby ct al.
DEPARTMENT SIX.
People VS.. J. G. Hoy.
Mergen VS.. SchurtZ.
Hermann VS.. Won der KulAen.
NEW SUITS.
Daniel Free man VS.. Walter E. Jones ct al =
Suit to recover s1436 20 on contract for pur-
chase of land. -a sill
s. r. Maclay vs.. ]. Hanna-Suit to recover
1920 on promissory note.
M. Z Frankel VS. E. H Boyd Suit to recover
on promissory note for s637 81.
G. Hinckley vs. August Krug-Action for
the recovery of $675 for professional services.
Rosa Rising petitions for admission to probate
of the will of Caroline C. Burton.
w. j.. Washburn petitions for admission to
probate of will of Frank E Washbura.
st. Vincents college VS.. NJ. V Biscailuz ct al
Complaint on foreclosure of mortgage for
$4,000.