St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1891-05-16

VIE STATE OF MINNESOTA, RAMSEY
Il County-DIstrict Court, Second Judi
cial District.
Lena NJ. Christophel ct al. against Katie
Albachten ct al.
At Chambers, May 18th, 1891.
Whereas An action was commenced In
this court on April 23d, 1891, by complaint
filed, and a summons issued thereon. which
summons is in the words and figures follow
ing:
ttrTHE STATE OF MINNESOTA, RAMSEY
Il County-District Court, Second Judi
cial District.
Lena NJ. Christophel, Carrie c. Christophel
and Henry Nj. CHRISTOPHER. minors, by The
St. Paul Trust Company, their general
guardian, and Harvey Officer, guardian
ad Item, plaintiffs against Katie AL
bachten formerly Katie ChristopheD and
Bernard Albachten. her husband; Lullers
Quinlan, John II. Allen. The Netherlands
American Land Company Frank w.
Chase, Franklin C. Gerhard, Simon Miller
Theodore Hamm, The Commercial Ma
tional Bank of ST. Paul. Minnesota Soap
Company William G. Potts, and Peter 7.
Potts, co-partners under the firm name
of Potts Brothers, w. II. Darby Charles
Krest and Charles Nyquist. co-parIners
doing business under the firm name of
Exchange Laundry, defendants-Sum-
mons tor Relief
The State of Minnesota to the above-named
defendantss and to all persons unknown,
having or claiming an interest in the real
estate situated in said Ramsey County, and
described in the complaint in this action,
as follows:
feet "a 1-12) south from the southwest cor
ner OF Fuller and Rice streets in the City or
St. Paul, thence west one hundred and
Twenty-Five feet Q25l more or less, to west
line or lot sixteen 16). thence south along
said west line forty-four and one-twelfth
IA LID feet, thence east one hundred and
twenty-five feet Q25), more or less to the
west line of Rice street, thence north along
one-twelfth GA 1-12) feet to the place
of beginning, being A 1-12 feet on Rice
street, and 125 feet in depth, and be-
ing the A liz feet of lots sixteen
90 seventeen On and eighteen ,GS).
west of west line of Rice street, in block
number six (6) of A. G. Fuller's addition to
St Paul, according to the recorded plat
thereof in and for said Ramsey county.
2. The north forty-four and one-twelfth
a. LIP feet of lots sixteen Q6), seventeen
90, eighteen as and that part of lot nine
teen Q9) west of Rice street, in block six (6).
In said A. G. Fuller's addition to st. Paul,
according to said plat on file in said Office of
Register of Deeds, being same premises
purchased by Agnes Murphy, formerly Nc
earthly, of Emma Rauget, Nov. II, 1873.
3. Also the south forty-four ana one
twelfth "a 1-12l feet of lotssixteen Q6), sew
enteen 90, eighteen QS) and that part of lot
nineteen Q9) west of Rice street. in said
block six Co. of said addition, being same
premises purchased by Agnes Murphy for
merly Mccarthy of Emma Rauget Nov. If.
1873.
You are hereby summoned and REQUIRED to
answer the complaint of the plaintiff i'll the
above-entited action, which complaint has
been duly filed in the Office of the Clerk of
said District Court at the City of st. Paul, in
said Ramsey county. and TO serve a COPY of
your answer to said complaint OH the snb-
scrlber at his office. in the City of ST. Paul i'll
the said County of Ramsey. within twenty
70 20 ffl.s
you, exclusive of the day OF such service;
and if you fail to answer the said complaint
within the time aforesaid, the plaintiff in
this action viii apply to the court for the re-
lief demanded in the complaint
Dated April BIRD 1891
[signedl HARVEY OFFICER,
Plaintiffs Attorney
St. Paul. Mimi
guardian ad Item for said plaintiffs has this
day filed III said cause his affidavit stating
that since the commencement of said action
he has discovered that William Hamm and
Joseph A. Blaeser ought in order to full
and just determination of such action to
have been made parties defendant therein
and stating the reasons why said persons
ought to have been made defendants therein,
and has also filed in said cause an amended
complaint in which said persons are named
as defendants therein, and which amended
complaint also states the reasons why they
ought to have been made defendants in said
acIon, ana Wnlcn SAID reasons are deemed
sufficient by this Court;
Now therefore, in the name of the State of
Minnesota, you, the said William Hamm and
Joseph A. Blaeser and each of you. are
hereby ordered and required to appear and
answer the said amended complaint, within
twenty days after the service of this order
upon you, exclusive of the day of such serv-
ice; and in default thereof, the Judgment
and relief demanded in said amended com
plant will be rendered against you in all re-
spects as though you had been made party
to such action in the first instance.
[Signedl CHAS. E. OTIS.
Judge of District Court
HARVEY OFFICER,
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Endicott Block, Fourth Street.