Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1891-07-08

enough talk, when the TfDune stated
repeatedly that John Henry Smith
had been recalled by "the Priesthood"
from working In the political field A. a
Republican, on each occasion, II will
fully and maliciously lied. Aud, fur
Their, there Ia scarcely an issue OF the
TrtJuno 10 which Intentional false
hoods concerning occurrences or indl'
vlduals do not appear. Moreover
when the truth l. made 70 clear that
II IL undcniable, instead Of with
drawing H. statements OF aosnowl'
edging IT. error, IL common
course IL 10 repeat IL lies IN another
form, or shelter Itself behind the skirts
OF sons uamele.s "fellable old laly" OF
"respcotable Citizen" who Is alleged
to have told somebody who told the
Tribune.
This time II says:
"wo did not manufacture the matter At
all. II wa. told by a prominent Mormon,
who knows. 10 q pfomineu, GENTLE, who
ls perfectly reliable, aud by him II was
told b. us"
Suppose this IL true, IL that ground
enough 10 Justify whA, tho Tribune
originally sald9 Here II l.:
Certain II j. that John Henry Smith
has had a recall Iti preity tough. aftef
he started out 10 DO an evangelist Tor tho
llepublinn party, 10 have Nv. wings
clipped In single fortnight"
ave know whereof We speak. We
know that Apostle John Henry has been
called TO account, and In that call tho
whole cuisines. is given away, and tina, IL,
that the priesthood Of the Church manip-
ula,cd hi. thing from tho frsl, and they
arc holding the same iron hand ON tho
rein that lhoy have through all the half
century that ha. lust closed"
The Tribune knew whereof II spoke;
II was certain and sure; II was no mere
rumor but something positively known
10 the cditon. How did they know ~
Why some unnamed "Mormon" told
u 7" some unnamed GENTLE" VINO
told II 10 somebody else, and that Il
Tribune proof, aud all tho proof II has
for numberlea- other lies which II pub.
fishes NJ pretended facts.
Now II does not matter whether n
hotmon" ora "GenliIe,"or dozen
'' ci'ner class told tho stupid story
ABOUT John Henry Smiths "fc.
vail" " must bc evident 10
mo whole community that thorc
i no truth In u, for the gentleman
-, a'' a"u "onA "aVo peoh
Y'eu VI question mas been and Is
~V'h'ns uiIlsently IN tho political
hv'u' uhe same a. before the fsisehood
was eoincdi aud II would seem that
coinn9n Prudence would suggest 10
-. ',,'''.' - - '-.. started thc
Wv "Vp'''y " MISUNDERSTANDING
' INST u'y were inisAksh' bst
NO. IN 'Aoeo' W" facts they llo on and
auh another faisehood 10 their black
catalogue. Here u u;
"At the time We .ald that. No ,h,nsh,
that tho Apo,,l, would BE- sen, out on one
more roundup. Tina, Ia. bc.n decided
upon and tho condition. ar. vary nnpv
We hopo In a foW day, Ia be able 10 ylyr
tho entire proofs
r,.,n'.,,,,,
Tribune dld MOI say ANYTHING m M.
Llnd when II utt.r.J the o,Ig,,,, M.
which was nm r,,,.iay Inn. m p,,
la.i sunday. ret,,,lng 10 m. m.,,., 4,
said,
1,y ~. ,,, -, H.. -,..-
uonne.d ,h., Al. ,ala IT,. y" '..' I".
hal I,csn recalled ,,om M ,o,l y, 49,, 49,.
olytlns ior R,n,hll,,n., ~, a.. ~.
crsi. had complained tina, he Wa, ,,l,,
bis apostolic influence among tho people
which was bad, and that IN con,ller,iIon
o. their complaint APOSTLE John Henry
had boon recalled. Tho Herald poo.
poohed at this webelloye the Ha,s did.
bui has John Henry been out on tho
fAnso making any more hspublicsn eon'
49, w, we , ',aI NOV, we thought "r
one no," ,,, /, 49,. s.' 'o '., nun our
,oy,s,h,a Ia,a -. ~, $50 vas W
r.l ana John u.nrv ~ ii, On, ,,s " ',''i
saints. Know. how IN r,c.ly, or,,sr. anJ
io obey ihom.n
What n t,nvl.i wall ,,s.. .,,u.,