Arizona weekly citizen. [volume] (Tucson, Ariz) 1880-1901, 1891-10-03
THE HENsY EXAMINATION:
Conflicting .Testimony-Dr. HANDY
Errand-Nearly Over.
TUESDAYS proceedings.

tuesdays proceedings.
The examination Of Frank Heney wa
continued before Judge Culver in tn
! probate court room this morning. Tn
principal matter of note was the ante
iuorte stmatement OF DR.. Handy made
short time after he was shot, 10 thu
presence of Judge Maxwell, Geo. S
Holbrook and Mrs. Smith, and whether
it should be admitted as evidence.
Judge Maxwell was put on the stand
He testified that be drew up the states
meny and that DR.. Handy approved it
but only touched the pen, being toe
weak 10 write.
Geo Holbrook was next witness, He
was present at the drawing up Of the
will and was rather severely cross-ex
examined by Judge Wright rs to
whether the statement was dictated by
DR.. Handy or written by Judge Max
we'll and merely approved by him. He W az
somewhat in the dark in that particular
regard and said it was partly dictated
Holbrook at tue present writing-2:3O p
mis- on the stand.
L IL, .
E. johnson and D. l.. Kresham, were
examined. Their testimony was unim
portant.
Wednesdays proceedings.
Conflicting testimony has been intro
dueed in the Heney examination. This
morning Tomas Duron was put on the
witness stand and through DR.. Goodwin
asinterpreter gave his evidence, being
everely cross -eka mined.
His testimony was that he saw the
ARRAY nearly from the commencement
and that the shot was fired on the side
walk. That Heney followed Handy.
and that Handy was trying to grab
something. Then they clinched. ,
J. q. Jones, one the United States
grand Jurors, was called by the court.
He was at the court lawn gate nearest
the church street corner, and saw the
men struggling. His evidece brought
out nothing new.
Thee. Fitch testified as to the probable
Grand of DR.. Handy in the vicinity. He
thought the doctor was going to see his
neice, who is quite i'll.
The norton statement, over
which much argument for and againss
its admission as evidence on the
ground that it was Judge Msxwelfs
writing and wording, rather than DE-.
Handy's, was finally admitted as eyid-
ence late yesterday afternoon.
The examination was probably con-
cluded today. AS tie CITIZEN goes to
press it is in progress.
Thursdays proceedings.
Today the desire on the part of the
defense seemed to be to bring out that
DR.. Handy had at various times and to
various people threatened the life of
Frank Heney.
The witnesses examined were DR.. F.
Il. Goodwin, Brewster Cameron, Chas.
2. Drake, John Weigle and Eugene
Behrendt and L. c. Hughes.
DR.. Goodwin testified that while rid
ng in a buggy from the hospital with
Dr. Handy. DR.. Handy had threatened
o kill Heney, using at the time very
trong adjective, which was understood
o be meant for Heney. He testified
hat he then told DR.. Handy that as
riend to both Honey nd Handy he
would inform Heney of that bad been
aid, and that subsequently he did.
Mr.. Camoron's testimony was that on
our distinct occasions, and with strong
nd abusive language, DR.. Handy had
threatened to kill Heney, sho uld Heney
AXE the case of Mrs. Handy.
Eugene Behrepdt testified th at he saw
Dung Rccs remoneve DR.. Handy's
evolver.
Deputy Welgle saw bruise mark on
Ieney's face su osequent TO the affrsy.