The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1891-12-11
SUPREME COURT IN BANCO.
1ne Full Calendar of Cases to
De Heard at the Special
Term on Monday.
December 2Ist.

| Vi Oau1eS ROBINSON, submission
III relation to the will of James Rob-
lnson and of the will of John N. Rob-
inson. Carter for plaintiffs, Hatch
for defendants. ''0'i
r. w. Aylett ct al. VS.. Keawea-
mani. Ejectment. Exceptions from
April term. Thurston & Frear.Ro Rose
for plaintiffs. Ashford-Hatch for de-
neutrality-suspicious..
James L. Duncan VS.. Wilder
Steamship Co. Damages. Excep-
tions from July term. Peterson for
plaintiff. Ashford for defendant-ap-
pellant. wy
Pauahi ct al. VS.. Opiopio. Contre-
Yersy for right of way in Palolo,
Observation-Disclosures for plaintiffs-ap-
peilants. MISUNDERSTANDING for
| defendant.
Emily de Herblay VS.. Samuel Nor
rls. Assumpsit. Exceptions from
decision of Dole, j. Neumann-Thurs-
ton d Frear for plaintiff. Hatch for
defendant-appellant.
Mary Sutherland VS.. James Suther-
land. Suit for separation. Appeal
from decree of Bickerton, J. Ma
| COON for plaintiff. Smith for defend
ant-appellant.
u. Ahlo VS.. T. ]. Hayselden, ct al.
Bill in equity for accounting. APP
peal from order of Dole, J, dismissing
| bill. Castle for plaintiff-appellant
Hatch for defendants.
Mohole Moanauli VS.. Rosina K.
Manaku. Bill in equity for injunc-
ton. Appeal from decree overriding
plea in bar. Hatch-Brown for plain
tiff; Thurston & Frear-Achi for de-
| PENDANT.
Mohole Moanauli VS.. Rosina K.
Manaku. Bill in equity to set aside
partition. Appeal from decree dis
missing bill. Hatch and Brown for
plaintiff-appellant; Thurston & Frear
and Achi for defendant.
Waikapu Sugar Co. VS.. Hawaiian
Commercial & Sugar Co. Ejectment.
Exceptions from order of Judd, G.. J.,
sustaining plea in abatement. Hart
| we'll, ThurstOn & Frear and Carter
for neutrality-suspicious.; Hatch for
| defendants.
Polly Mokunui VS.. Moke Mokunui.
| Petition for annulment of marriage.
Appeal from decree of Judd, G. J.,
| dismissing bill. Rosa for plaintiff
| appellant; Kaneakua-Bar for
defendant.
T. A. Lloyd, deputy tax-collector,
VS.. Joe Kalana. Non-payment OF
personal taxes. Appeal from the Po-
lice Court of Honolulu. Question re-
served by Judd, G.. J. Creighton for
| plaintiff; Huntsman-NaWahi for de-
neutrality-suspicious..
The Queen VS.. Leong Man. Opium
selling. Exceptions from Third Cir
cult. Ashford & Ashford for defend
ant.
w. r. Castle VS.. J. f. Bowler.
Damages for alleged warranty of foal.
Appeal from Police Court of Homo
lulu and motion to dismiss the APP
peal. Hartwell for plaintiff-appel-
liant; Peterson for defendant.
Rosina K. Manaku VS.. Moholi Moa-
nauli. Ejectment. Exceptions from
Ac iFiD1 'i for 60 pi AIN Hatch
Brown for neutrality-suspicious..
M. Rose VS.. administrator of the
estate of D. Kalakaua. Damage. EX-
ceptions from October term. Hart
well Smith for plaintiff appellant;
Hatch for defendant.
Heeia Agricultural Co. VS.. VIM.
Henry. Water controversy from dis
trict of Koolaupoko. Brown for
plaintiff-appellant; Magoon for de-
fendanC.
The Queen VS.. Young Quai. AS
sault and battery. Exceptions from
October term. Carter for defendant
appellant.
Steamship Co. Action on the case.
Executions from October term. Hart
we'll for plaintiff; Hatch for defend
ant-appellant.
c.. Alec VS.. Wong LeOng. Assump-
sit. Exceptions from October term.
Hartvell Ashford & Ashford for
plaintiff; Castle for defendant-appel-
All Leong VS.. Kee You. Replevin.
ADpeal from Dole, J., at chambers.
Magoon for plaintiff-appellant; john
son for defendant.
Manuel Vierra, Jr., VS.. John +.
Hackfeld. Bill in equity to set aside
deed; petition for writ of error. Ash
ford & Ashford for plaintiff in error;
Hatch for defendant in error.
The Queen VS.. All Liu. Assault
with deadly weapon; exceptions from
order of Dole, j., overrullng motlon
i'm arrest of judgment. HartWell for
defendant-appellant.
The Queen VS.. Lau Kin Chew ana
five others. Arson in the first degree
question or azure IOlS tCqulU l eoOA w.
Nv Judd, CO.. Davidson, Neumann
and Peterson for defendants.
In re boundary between the Iands
called Humuula (Crown) and Kaohe
GGovernment), in the Island OF Ha-
wall, appeal of Crown Land Com
missioners from decision OF +. >.
LYMAN, Commissioner. Hatch iol
the appellants: Acknowledgement for
4l,o GOuornmant
The Queen VS.. Apoi, charged WITT
assaulting one Akana (Chinaman),
l an informer exceptions from NO
vember term of Third Circuit. Neu
7 mann for defendant-appellant.
Hawaiian Commercial and Sugal
: Comnanv VS.. the Waikapu Sugar
Company; suit in equity for partition
S and accounting. Appeal from decree
Of the Chancellor Overruling demurre
and nlea ia abatement. Hatch 10
plaintiffs; Hartwell, Garter, r. fr afs
E Thurston for notwithstanding:
Tn re estate of Kealiiahonul /; petl
ton of T, Kaae for revocation OF tn
. will Appeal from decision OF Dole
= +. everything demurrer and pea Il
statement. Ashford d ASHFORD
HartweIl Carter, for petltloner
Hatch for the pleas.
xaI. <I,o cnf>1 n