Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1891-05-17
MAGAZINE MANUSCRIPTS.
Hero Is Man Who Has Little FaitI, in
the Judgment OF Readers.

II have had something to do with the
business of story writing in my time, both
as a producer and judge of other peoples
work" said a man of letters. The latter
occupation l finally abandoned, because
the labor of inspecting manuscript con-
tributions in bulk was too wearing. | don't
think 1t is found particularly so, as a rule,
by readers for magazines, because they ne
Elact it. Often il is impossible that it
should be otherwise. One great monthly
in New York city receives ,200manuscripts
every week in the year If its reading staff
was multiplied by six proper examination
could not De given to them all. As it is, it
j. the exception that is so fortunate as to
be looked at
Persons send contributions to the big
magazines with the notion that they will
he read. They are victims of delusion,
usually. ], who have seen the inside works
of such concerns, say it. Tie task of get
ting through the vast number of manu-
scripts submitted is so hopeless that little
more is attempted with the great majority
than &c return them, ordinarily after many
days If you are mt al! known by reputa-
ton your offering is likely to be inspected,
but not otherwise.
"Games have often been tried upon the
great monthlies for the purpose of seeing
whether this was so or not. George w.
Gable, the famous author, published the
results of few such experiments of his
own awhile ago. He sent two or three of
his stories, under an assumed name, the
rounds of the New York magazines. They
were refused by every one-found mot
available'-whereupo he dispatched them
over his own signature, and they were
promptly accepted.
Before he achieved his reputation he
was unable to secure the printing OF many
of tie tales which have since come to be re-
sarded as classical. Poison Jone' was
hawked about the metropolis in vain; not
nu EDITOR would buy it. 1t was this early
experience which led Mr.. Cable to his sub
sequent experiments, the result of which
pointed to the conclusion that contribu
lion offered to one of these monthlies
had scarcely the slightest show upon its
merits unless a known name was attached
TO it.
Several years ago when l was alto
gether unknown I myself used to try some
little tricks upon the magazine readers,
such a. putting the smallest possible daub
of glue between two of the pages of my
manuscript or turning one of the leaves
upside down. Invariably upon the return
of the contribution l would find the two
pages still stuck and the turned leaf as be-
fore, proving that it really had not been in
spected. 1t was discouraging, though not
SO much SO as to suppose that my work had
been fairly read by an expert and pro-
nOunced not worth publishing. You may
try the trick yourself, and you will find
that 1t will go every time.
"Gn one occasion | sent r story to a GER
tain important monthly, entitled The
Crystal Ball. The editor returned it with
the usual Uhanks, saying: we are sorry to
find that your contribution called The
Cheerful Bull'' is not available for our pur-
poses 1t reminded me of the famous
translation OF 'Triste Lupus by a class
mate OF Tom Brown at Rugby, as The
Sorrowful Wolf
Il wish could remember all the funny
things / came across in the manuscript
submitted to me for perusal when for a
time | served as reader for a magazine
There was one story that reached its dra-
matte climax when the hero and his family
were beseged in a wooden cabin by Indians.
The savages, several hundred in number,
had lighted fire all around the dwelling
and we're breaking in though the roof with
axes. At this critical juncture the hero re-
marked thou ghtfully 1t is time that we es-
capped. w Washington Star