The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1891-09-13


A. A. Sesgrave VS.. John CONTRADICTION TO
quash service of summons; continued
b. Gartinkle ct al. VS.. G. Lsugert-Demurrer to
complaint; confessed
W. II. Pinokney vs.. Puget Sound and Alaska
continued
X. NJ. Void vs. L. C. Hoag-Notiou and de-
murrer; continued
William Devine vs. l. c. Hoag-Motion and
demurrer; continued.
+. r. Dunn va H L. Denny-Motion to make
complaint more definite; continued.
J. j. Cannon VS.. J. b. Transformation to
make complaint more definite continued.
CIVIL DEPARTMENT-TRIAL-os J.
Stanley VS.. Bryant-September Is.
Smith vs. Arthur-October %
Lyle VS.. Keevy-September -.
Alphonse Judes vs. Bowers-October Is.
Fox VS.. Coleman-October |.
Biatchiord VS. Journal Publishing Company
September "a.
sweningdabe vs. McLean-september2 %
Black vs. kronnick-September %.
Ullman VS.. Pumphrey-October 10
Graf VS.. City of Seattle-September D.
Reed vs. Hght-October %.
Chezum va. Kriek baum-O October IS
Sumerton VS.. Ward-September %.
Faux VS.. Front Street Cable-September 3d.
X. Nevins, jr., VS.. NJ. NJ. singleton-Septem-
| Der "a.
Rosa Christensen VS.. observation-disclosures
October 20.
Morgan va Union Pacific Railway-septem-
| Der %.
Schumacher VS.. Union Pacific Railway-Sep-
TENDER %.
Ns. oedttle hdliTOdu company
October 10.
Zipser VS. Moran-september IS
Goldsmith VS.. Leek-September %.
Seattle Crockery Company VS.. Cert Schloss-
Reed VS. Day-october 81.
Gilman VS.. Jones-Septemb Der "a
Toklas, Singerman & Co VS.. Ida Bowman
September "A
Cleveland Puget Sound Laundry vs. W. A..
Morse-September %.
CIVIL MorIoNs-BEFoRE HUMEs, J.
Company-Demurrer to complaint: continued.
Nv. II. Thompson ct al. vs.. Claussen-S " eeney
Brewing Company-Demurrer 20 complaint;
continued.
g. NJ Keller vs. City of seattlc-Motion TO
make complaint more definite: denied.
Il. c. Miles Company vs.. ". A Robertson
Demurrer to com plant; waived.
NJ. Harmon Histo. Mrd. Company ct al
Motion and demurrer; continued.
J. H. Allen ct al. Vs. Washington Southern
Railway Company-Demurrcr 10 complaint;
continued.
II. Lewis VS. C. C. Colemau-Demurrer TO com
plant: overruled.
make complaint more definite denied.
L. II. Clancy ct al. VS.. Josie Williams-De-
murrer to complaint; continued.
I. II. Clancy ct al. vs.. Peter Refs ct AIDE
murrer to complaint; continued.
T. ii. Clancy VS.. q. Meisner ct al.-Demurrer
to complaint: continued.
+. ii. Clancy ct al. vs.. F. uist-Demurrer
To complaint; continued.
Holbrook, Merrill II Stetson VS.. Conner. Glen
non & Grundy-Demurrer to complaint; over
ruled.
Claussen-sweeney Brewing Company vs. Ida
REORGANIZATION and demurrer: stricken.
W. Burritt VS. W. Graves-Motion to make
complaint more definite granted.
FL Paso National Bank VS.. ). G. Fernandez
Demurrer to complaint; stricken.
A. II. Blackwell VS.. {. {. Coleman--Demurrer
to COMPLAINT: waived.
D. Ancona vs. G. Davies-Demurrer to com
plHtuIt continued.
LIMA Ericsson vs.. 4 G Thompson-Demurrer
IN rnrr, M Mi N
.. " crane ". e. c. Coleman-Demurre to
complaint; stricken.
t. VI RasIer vs. James Con. Co-Motion to
make complaint more definite; continued
Bruu,WiCk-Ealke c. Co. vs.. W. +. Allen Il
Co.--TNo motions; continued.
issac Harrs ". c. T. Webb - Demurrer TO
c ,mp aint: waived.
1ohn 2 ,'aie IS c. J. Kilgen-pemurrer to
c uiu.g,ut cnr+'f.tE"t.
puge; : dNatjonai Ia VS. Fisk & seaver-
II u "a for chutGe oi venue: Gcuied.
BESSIE NJ Wilson ". y. p K. X. Co.-Dcmurrer
TO complaint. ONerru,ed.
". r. Boyd & Co VS.. q. l.. Hlll-Demurrer 10
complaint. waived.
J. Schrnm vs. Celia Mitchell ct al.-Demurrer
IL COMPLAINT. oVerruled.
J. Oleson vs.. e. +. Stevens-Motion 10 set
aside service of summons; denied.
Albro Gardner ~. ". F. Parker-Motion and
demurrer: denied.
J +. EiCherly ". r. Young et al.-DemuTrer
90 = npisint; oyeuuled-
" j. Rule - Z. F Sweeney-DemurEer to
complaint; confessed.
- Uemartcr To- complaint, overrnleu.
e. NeiDel vs.. /. observation-disclosures 20
complaint: continued.
Hannah +. Has .ius va. J. Caspers-pemurrer
Go complaint. continued
J. H. Fosel ". ". A. Ritchie-Dvmurrer TO
Cumplaint. waived.
J. NJ " les ling " x. NsVlns, lr.-Demurrer 10
complaint; oVerCuleG.
W IL. Il ewes " Mary Mckeoue-pemuV:er 10
complaint. continued.
Ii. Steinman VI. Ii. thaplu-pemuTFer 10 com
plant. continued
Josiah Collins. !r.. Us q. Z. Hall ct al.-De-
murrcr 10 complaint. waived
= {. Mllc> 90. IS. Puget sound Machinery
Depot-Motion 10 make complaint more definite.
RAINIER Hotel GO. vs.. Frank D. Ray-Motjon 70
amend complaint more certain continued.
L ( P : L T. CO. W. :. kuGG>on ct sl-pe-
murrCr 70 ump4asuts stricken.
Columbla 4 Puget sound Railroad Company
vs. J. Ray-peuuTTeT to complaint; sdIcken.
J. Ry!and vs. Terry hing-Moilou 10 DISMISS {.
continued.
rQrIrY DEPARTMENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, J.
Adams vs. Observation-Disclosures 10 Septem-
Blsckman VS.. wllliams-order confirming
sGle.
Maxwell vs.. Johnson-Continued to septem-
Der IA.
Johnston v Harrington K smish-Continued
to september -;
Hess ". We5theimc--S Settled.
Justin Is, >nequalmle MIL company
=, Thompson vs.. Huron Lumber Company
| N .ltIaN- 80 tcMN1f "a
Nerw.nSs FAlrhaven Land Comqany-sepiem-
Der a
Poet VS. Psr't-Ovdsr t. confirm sale: signed
Norris ". Puget sound shore Railroad COM
| Iany ct a., Anita Rydean Phillips interVeaor
/ Defendants motion 10 make .uteryeuoT com
plain; more definite; denied
Mechanics Mil aud Lumber Company ".
O. Thomas-Fl&lut.f demurrer; oyerruied.
Calhoun VS.. LCary Collins Land Company
October ].
Col VS.. Nelson aud City Of Seatt'e-City 5
demurrer oyerTulsd; exception allowed; De-