Iowa County democrat. [volume] (Mineral Point, Wis.) 1877-1938, 1891-11-20

COunltT-Clhlnleu LOT po9lDoO idHlhAc6'
The jury found $4,000 damages for the
defendants, and judgment was given for
defendants for the difference between that
and the balance sued for which with costs
amounted to so, 029.95. The jury returned
special verdict consisting Of forty-two
findings. On account of the deficiencies
of this verdict which are fully discussed
by Justice Cassoday, the supreme court
reverses the Judgment below and sends
the case back for new trial
The Record.
The official record of opinions rendered
is az follows.
Parks w. West Side Ry. Co. Motion to
dismiss appeal denied with $40 costs.
Hubbard, Spencer, Bartlett & Go, VS..
Crib ct al. Motion for re hearing denied
with $25 costs.
In re. Ryan for writ OF prohibition,
Motion for re-hearing denied without
costs.
Mcdonald VS.. State. Motion for re-
hearing denied.
Cornell University Va. Mead ctn nj. Mo.
ton for re-hcaring denied with 525 costs,
BOswith Va. Merchants lns. Co. Mo
ton for re.hearing denied with $25 costs
htwell ct al w. Widgerson. Order
affirmed.
Young Vs. Burhnns. Judgment reversed
ana remanded for new trial.
Pritton Va Erickson. Order affirmed
,.l,,.l
Palmer w. Halves. Order affirmed.
Kelley W.. Kelley ct nj, Order reversed
and remandcd with directions to sustain
the demurrer to the complaint.
Goerke VS.. GoCrke. Order affirmed
Costs of both parties to be paid out of the
estate.
Ford Vs. Ford Order and judgment
affirmed.
Ceisinger vs.. Heyl. Judgment affirmed
Second National Bank of ST. Paul vs.
Larson Judgment affirmed.
Shuman vs. Shumon. Judgment affirm
ed.
Kelley vs.. Kelley. Order of Judgment
appealed from affirmed.
Smith vs.. Lockwood. Judgment affirm.
ed,
N'Nh"R W. NtH'O 'hNElii'hN ltN'lN
ed and rcmNnded for new trial
Stockmm VS.. G. 4 N. w. Ry Co. JudR
mcnt affirmed.
Weadock VS.. Kennedy, Judgment re-
vcrsed and romanded for new trial
Second National bauk of BeIoit vs.
Louis h. Merritt, garnishee. Judgm Mt
reversed and remanded with direction to
dismiss the proceedings of punishment
against Louis b Merrill
Second National Bank of Bcloit VS. Jane
h. Merrill garnishce. Judgment reversed
and remained with direction to dismiss
the garnishcc proceedings against Jane
b. Merrill, Justice Winslow dissents.
StuCttgen vs.. Wisconsin Central Co.
Judgment affirmed
Allen VS., Weber. ludgmen, affirmed
Montreal River Lumber company vs.,
Mihil.s ct al, Judgment reversed and re.
mNnded for new trial.
Street vs.. Johnson. Order affirmed
Becker VS.. lrickel, Judgment affirmed
Noelz VS., Voel8. Order affirmed
Evans w, Foster. Judgment reversed
and remanded with directions to enter
Judgment in favor of the plaintiff agdinst
the defendant less any excess of interest
that may have been included.
State VS.. Bromwel, Writ of error dis
missed.
Moeller VS.. Moore. Judgment reversed
and rcmanded with directions to render
Judgment for the plaintiff according to
tEe'prayer of the complaint
Ellis VS., N, 7, Ry, Co Judgment af.
! irmcd.
Smith VS., c., Nj. & st, T. Ry. Co Order
affirmed
Olson VS., C., NJ. 4 st, I. Ry. Co, Judg.
ment reversed and remanded for new
| trial
Baker VS.. State, Judgment reversed
and remanded for a new trial.
Perrin VS., State. Judgment affirmed
| Clas vs.. logemm, Appeal dismissed
without costs, 10y stipulation.
lordon vo. Fox, Judgment reversed 10y
stipulation.
Arguments were made in the following
cases;
Bishop, appellant, VS.. McGilis, respon.
dent Argued 10y II. O. Fairchild for
appellant and by +. G. Eastman for re.
spondeut,
Watson ct al, appellants, VS. Roberts
ct al, respondents Argued by II. ..
Fairchild for appellants and by I, Il,
Hudd for respondents,
Cratic, administrator, etc, ", the Mil.
wauke, 4 Northern railroad company, re.
spondent, Suggestion of death of appel