The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1891-12-13
AFTER THE BATTLE.
Tamnaay Looks OvcR tn Field and Einds
Only Three Wcakeaed DisarActs.

After each election sensational ana m1slead.
ing rumors OF wholesale changes in Tammany
Hall district leaderships gain credence. and
much gossip is INDUCED In by uniformed
persons regarding such supposed changes.
Notwithstanding the fact that at the late eiec-
ton the candidates nominated by Tammany
made. practically. clean sweep. that the head
OF the Tanmany judiciary ticket had ma
jority OF about &. 900 over all competitors. and
that every candidate On the judiciary and
county ticket had an absolute majority over
all opponents collectively. believers have been
found In the post election yarns OF many ex-
cited local statesmen. The fact is that . change
OF leadership Is to be made in one district only.
and. possibly. that two other districts may be
reorganized partly. the three being those in
which the showing made by the local leaders
fell below the expectations at Tammany head
quarters. The district In which change Of
leadership is not only foreshadowed but de-
termined Is the Twenty-second. That has
been for many years . Tammany Hall strong-
hold. always giving tho Tammsny nominees
big msjorities and making splendid showing
for Che Democratic State candidates. At the
preyioss good wors The Assembly
i sns X as y
1Ss Asse 20 esss Res .Sas
Alderman, and Mr. Hart, the Tammany nomi-
nee, owed his success e that fact. his vote
hsying. been 1000 less than the total vote Of
Among, Tapmany men the failure Of the
organization In the Twenty-second 70 make
sSssnse ana nsesss local
MoouadH Mr. McoqSds is one 81 the T .sin.
more than twenty years. ago. he e = vetersp IL
mRsSse sa q A ssHss Hs Sa%
hot poA
amount q ey xeS many NJ
s assd %s q
sss$sy /: IA tSs .sS IL
fsssa bidder sSSt5s. sSsS Sss y tSs
have, en4rossed his attention, e fully that he
Tnmms 81 he tSs K az Se
Sayns been cen !nssesssISis. ssasEsI!s e those s
The. Assembly candidate. Blumenthal. IN
sehso '
Of his attitude in the Legislature In opposing
hs b Ills 1G hss
he became inyolvea r 9 0ontr9yeIsy with bis
sSmbes Of I ts oSfss
than any other district In town. They COM
tass 90 Is not
YaSha' few ssy SP Ss
IN most y The Districts Of the city asy the Tam.
der Mr.: Me0aade's management. has been an
ns y ya sad sssSa os ana
ior%er IS very Pe!y e ssSsssa f. desires
he IN ga q dist4se asr JAM sao9t
& i aZ cs %sS N a hssS
sHf2h@ sas 4 ss . Rs
W! issasss Fl g e.
and less sS votes sef than a hi hsd IL 1883
on the ether hand. Fassett,s totgi was 10 ex;
ski55Sp ibis IL said q
KesnSH's partner m tho liau@r business and
the as
saHsss chief among mon tLs%; ga T sa mon
soaa ti%%er w sess shsnss soas
In the Twenty; fourth DISTRICT Tammany Hall !
Beaten & ana Sss
semblyman was beaten By gW; The District |
has two Alderne 1 i. for the Twenty fourth
ana an Ia 81 q.
Lynch sss Ssa
ss great most slsaS sn BE
asa sass s.fss e
tia 81 sr IL 1s and
+ sse n NJ III oT E%pas S x As.1
3: :as Hsss's . sss
fs e.. e: ssjs tx
sass sss tSxslss: sss
Z Sss ss sass esR
.hsIssSis; MsSSss Ssaqs ssrrisd ~ ai.tsiGs
%ss
cratic State ticket had q plurality Of 1900 in
M hs out ss
q district leaders iI town. but he las had
are personal opponents. In the rear. just |
What may be d998 to stfengthen the hAHds
q dsRoslIps him: g not cs5tsin ,yst: Sat one
D law by the legislature taking away Commit
s &C. sas q sbs
SSstaa HST such S would fare Ssnnos
House 81 the fssslstuSs' s SS IN DOUBT S1
but the, general belief g that sueh an effort
would be attended with grave danger, for, |
while temporarily erinnlipg tho Opposition TO
Mr. Pgrroy. " would MOI. damage 1t sufficiently
ths osr dstets NUN iS ts ses aty
tho expiration Of the thirty days limit after /
election Tor stock taking and . esnsus 81 the /
ss ssoSaAtiSn, ably 9ons.ailed ksrmoni.