The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1891-10-04
SUPREME COURT DOCKET.
Alignment OF Causes for Hearing .
the Term Beginning October IL.

the Term Beginning October IL.
OLYMPIA. Oct 3-TSpeciai. 1.-The supreme
court has assigned causes for hearing at the
term beginning October II, a. given below. OF
the IS appeals docketed, 40 are from King
county, Is from Pierce, each from Lewis and
Jefferson, from Spokane, 8 each from What
com, Chehalis and Klickitat, 2 each from Thurs
ton and Yakima, and each from Douglas, Kit
utas, Pacific, snohomish, Kitsap and Island:
State Va. Cecilia: Jefferson-October IL.
Enos Va. Wilcox ct al; Spokane-0ctober Il
Bardwell, Robinson & Co. VS.. Ziegler; spokane
October 1a
Callahan and wife VS.. Houghton ct al; spo-
nne-october 13
ely Of Spokane Falls VS. Brown ct al; Spo-
uns-0etober IL
sndley Va kellogg; Douglas-October IA
Aafendeau VS.. Fugelli; Kittitas-0ctober Is.
.Lafisht VI. State Insurance Company; Kick
staisvs smith; Klickitat-october Is.
state W Hanshew; Klickitat-Oetober 19.
caldwell vs. First National Bank; Yakima
Levin vs. Liehty ct al, Yakima-october 20.
wallace vs. Johnson, Pacihc-Oetober 81.
Robinson vs.. Bethel ct al, Thurston-octo-
Warren va his creditors ct al, Thurston-oc.
Gray's Harbor Brick Company VS.. Walton,
Cnehalis-october %.
Olsen vs. Newton, tax collector. Chehalis-oc-
tober &c
Dalney Va. Distler, Chehalis-october %
Marsh va Degeler ct al, Lewis-october n.
somerville VS.. Johnson ct al, Lewis-octo-
Ger n.
Frost VS.. the Ainslie Lumber Company, Lewis
-October ..
Meeker vs.. Johnson, Lewis-october IS
snider VS.. kelso ct al, Lewis-oetober %.
Book ct nj. VS.. scully ct al, Pierce-October %
Lomer VS.. Ralph, Pierce-November
Cline vs.. Burrichter Co.. Pierce-Novem-
ber2
Cline vs. Harmon & Co, Pierce-November 2
Cline va. Tacoma Stone Company. Pierce-No-
vemher 2.
Becker VS.. satsop Railroad Company. Pierce
Rourk VS.. Miller, Pierce-November
Boyle vs.. Puget Sound Cooperative Colony,
Fierce-Novcmber 4.
State VS.. George stowe, Pierce-Noyember l.
Wagner VS.. Law ct al, Pierce--November s.
lee ys. Lee, Pierce-Noyember 5.
stase vs.. Jones, rierce-Novembers
lscoma Hotel Com pany VS.. Tacoma Light and
"sssf Company. Pierce-November Q.
nsaoest VS.. Tacoma Light aud Water Com
PAY, Pierce-November O.
SOU Va Burns, Pierce-November 10.
esv'fnern Pacific Puget Sound Railroad
Ssnpany vs. Coleman ct al, King-Novem-
ssplthill VS.. Jones, King-November IL
kiler VS.. State, King-November IL
Aeane Va Brigger cts al, king-November II
STATE vs. Hammond, king-November l6
seattle Electric Railway and Power Company
Cunningham king-November l6
seattle Montana Railroad Company vs.
eheeke ct al, king-November IL
: Jensen & Crosset va Washington Iron Works
Ang-November IL.
City of Seattle ct al. vs.. Brown, King-Noyem.
her Is
Ferguson VS. Ryan, King-Novemherl
Baxter vs.. City 81 Seattle, Kiug--Noyember 10
Palmer VS.. He;hernGton, king-November 70.
Howard Us. Ross, King-NoveInber g.
Everton VS.. Powell ct al, king-Noyember q
Pencil VS.. The Home Insurance Company.
Alng-Noyember "a
Shiiberg VS.. Jones, King-November "a
nigman vs. Spur, King-November2 -
rsal. assessor, VS.. Furth, king--NoveInher IS
raul, assessor, VS.. McGraw ct al, king-So-
vember 25
viidtne Smythe Manufacturing Company VS..
-xx,tsrs king-Noyember 80
nHeAay va Russell ct al; King-December /.
Iparalm vs.. kelleher ct al. ktng-December L
,aaoenceur VS.. Northern Pacific Railroad Com
Nhy: king-December .
ceotasn VS. McGraw; ktng-Deeember2
Eaaefson vs. Cochran; king-December
ssusoh VS.. Cattell Ell al; King-December 8.
CssssS slnson; king-Decemher I.
Der = 81 w. oayWood, hing-Dscem-
pis-beeemberS
N.Y. es al. VS.. Marine; King-DecemberS
c<mhsra e' III vs. aHrmon ct al; King-De-
sea,f s, et al vs.. o'Brien; King-Decemhsr 9.
Hawkips :, W W MeSraw; king-Deeember 10.
COMPANY. ga a.. VS. Front Street Cable Railroad
>Astn Pacific land Puge. sound Shore