Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1891-12-07

The lint ballot resulted. Crisp 81.
Mills ~, Springer ~, Mcmillan rs,
Hatch II, Stevens /. The doaile
are ~ follows;
For Crisp - Allorson, Alexander,
Allen, Amermau, Bacon, Bankhead,
Beuman, bentley, blanchard, Blount,
Burch, Bullock, Bum, Cadmus,
Campbell, Castle. Catching, Clarke,
(AlR.), Cobb, (AiA.l. Cochran, Comp.
ION, Cowle-, Crawford, Cumming,
Daniels, Donovan, DUNCAN. Dunphy,
Edmunds, Elliott, Ellis, English,
Epea, Everett, Fellows, Fitch, Fornoy,
F0w Ter. Gelssenhainer, Gillespie,
Grady, Greenleaf, Haynes, Hemphlll,
Henderson, Herbert, Johnston, (5.C.l
Jonee, kribb,, Lawson, (Ga.b Lay.
ton, Lostor, (ya.l, Lester (Gtl,
Lewis, Little, Livingston, Malloty,
Mcdonald, Mckay, Mclise, Mont.
gomury, Moses, Oates, O'Ferrell, Ouih'
waite, Ovens, Page, tMd.l Pattison,
Paynter, pendlutOp, Raynor, Robert
son, Rockwell, Rusk, Siackhouse,
stump, s,llman, Turner, Turpin,
Van Horn, Warn lex, Whuuler, Ala,h
Williams IN. o. and Winn--si.
For Miiis-Abb0tt. Andrew, Bailey,
Barwig, Bowman, Brawlcy, Breckin-
ridge (Ark.l Brackinridgo (Ky.),
Brctz, Bricknrr, BroOkahire, Brown,
Bunner, Bushnell, Butler, Bynum,
Caminelti, Capshart, Caruth, Cate,
Cnutcy, Chaplin, Ciane, COburn, Coil
idgc, Cuombsi Cooper, Cox ~. ",
Cram, Crosby, Culb-fs0n, DeForcs',
Dickeruon. DIXON, Fithlan, Formau,
Geary, Hall, Hamilton, Hare, Hafflos,
NNsuW NNFFNFH
son (O.l, Kendall, kilgoru, Lane. Lam
ham, LaphAm, Lockwood, Long, Way
net, McAluaT. McCreAry, Mckinney,
Mayor, Mitchell, O'Nct iMo. Barrett,
| PoarsDu, Sayurr, Seerlcy, Secrecy,
Slahluecker, Stewart lrex.l, Tracy,
Tucker, Warner. white, wiid0x, Wii.
liams Aass.l, Wilson (W. Val, Wise
/ and Wolvcrton-73.
For McMillan- Beilshoovor, Boomer,
Bunting, Chapman, Covert, Cox
| (rtnn,l, Enloc, Goodnight, Kyle,
Logan, Patterson, Pierce, Price, Rich
ard on, SnndgJass, StockdRlo, Stone
! (ky.l Aud Wnshiugton-lH.
I For Springer - Bsbbitt, Bryan,
BIscy, Gable, Durboffuw, GAni2, Cor
msu, Holman, Houk (Ohiol, Lsw-on
! (NMh Lynch, Martin, Mcclellan. Ma
con, Miller, Mowhorry, Page tR. IL,
. Patton, Roilly, Scott, Shivcly, SNOW,
Stevens, Stewart ulL Stout, Terry,
Weidlock, Wheeler (Mich.b Whitney,
NikesWilliams (lll.), N0umans-a2
For llatch-ArnOld, Bland, Byrnes,
CObb Mol DearmOnu, Dockery, Hal
lowell, Heard, Mausur, Norton, Riley,
shell, raunoy, Wilson (AIo.)-
For Stevens Of Massachusetts
/ O'Neill Mass ~.
THE CHANGING nguINs.
In the next two ballots Lawson,
! Pool, Smell, stevens and Muldlocls
broke % Crisp, Mlusur and Williams
10 Mills. The Illinois doser,lons hand.
icApped Springer at once. Flthian,
/ Fnrmnu and Lane were subsequently,
Joined 10y WiSc, Scott aud Williams,
who aisO deserted their candidate and
voted steadily for Mills. During all
the time, however, Springer received
the constant support Of the Michigan
delegation aud a portion OF the Indiana
and Wisconsin delegations, and his
loyal followers In Illinois for long
time felt encouraged that this outside
support would ultimately rally tho d g.
seTtiug Illinois members 10 the solid
support Of Springer.
On tho ninth ballot Gant1 Of Ohio
changed from Springer 10 Crisp, IN
ORDER he said, 10 partially offset the
action OF some OF Springeris Illlnoi.
supporteTa, who had deserted 10 Mills,
II was after S O'Clock this evening
when the tenth ballot WAS concluded,
aud tho members
BfuAS 10 OFT VERY WEARY,
as ballot after ballot was passed with
out showing any material change.
During all these six hours constant
procure was being exotted by various
leaders to scatter the forces Of Springer,
MCMILLAN and Hatch. but the hardy
followers OF these gentlemen stood
rcsOluta.
GA the twelfth ballot Crisp and Nc.
MILAN lost one each, while Springer
showed gain Of three. Bull0cl,
(Florids) aud Weadook (Mass.), con.
clnded TO support Springer, while
CAN'T (Ohio) returned TO his Bral
choice.
The secretary drawled YEARLY
through the fifteenth ballot, and Sprin-
gers seventeen votes showed an up.
parent gain Of three votes over the pre-.
ceaing, but Holman announced that
through an error in computation,
Springer was credited with fourteen
votes In the previous ballot, whereas
the Illinois candidate actually received
seventeen votes. The record Of the
fourteenth ballot was accordingly
ordered corrected.
After the seventeenth ballot, which
showed no change In the situation, tn,