The record-union., 1891-10-14

Following is the list of cases to be heard by
the Supreme Court at the November term TO
be held in this city:
Attorneys are requested to file petitions for
rehearing in the San Francisco Office. Parties
desiring to submit any OF the causes upon
this calendar upon briefs, and without oral
argument, are requested to make such sub
mission On the first or second day of the ses-
sion.
MONDAY, November 8, 1891.
14,772-Brown VS.. Prewitt.
20,S79--People VS.. Lee Yune Chung.
20,SS0-People VS.. Dixon.
20, ,SS3-People vs.. Perino ct al.
2O,SS6-Peopie VS.. Fleming.
20, ,S84-People vs. Wallace.
TUESDAY, November 9th.
ID, 4,100-Merced County VS.. Widman.
Ii, 4,1O1-Merced County VS.. Moran.
IA, 152-Merced County VS.. Bariilas.
13, 555-Redd VS.. Murry ct ux.
13,945-GoIdberg VS.. ThoGll son ct al.
14,125-Forsyth VS.. Dunagan ct al
14,091-A1cC0y VS.. $. p. Company.
14,407-Landregan vs.. Peppin.
14,264-Tregea VS.. Owens
4,327-Pcnnie (as administrator, etc. VS..
Visher ct al.
Ia, ,6o2-Murray VS.. Colgan.
WEDNESDAY, November L, 1891.
DEPARTMENT. ONE.
14,5q1-Upton VS.. Upton.
IA, 4,725-Reclamation District No. 124 VS..
Gray.
13,829-Jatunn VS.. Smith ct al.
14,31S-Hudepohl VS.. Liberty Hill Wa NJ.
14,479-Kendrick ct al VS.. Diamond Con.
IA, 4,567SByrne ct al. VS.. Byrne.
14,639-Austin vs.. Gagan, ST., ct al.
14,4S5-Vcnzke VS.. NenZke.
14,756-Millan VS.. Hood.
14,T2S-Ranlelli VS.. IRISH
DEPARTMENT TWO.
147O2-Sellick VS.. De Carlow ct al
14,443-Churchill VS.. Baumann ct al.
14,435-Culverhous vs.. Crosen ct al.
14,434-Welsh VS.. PluInaS County.
14,721-Mofitt VS.. Bulson.
l4.594-Tehama Con. Chrome d. Co. VS..
Knight ct al.
14,627-Cornwen VS.. Foster ct al.
14,729-Estate of Kingsley.
14.430-Ward VS.. Marshall.
14,53S-Clausen VS.. Meister, etc., ct al.
14,716-Clarkson VS.. Hoyt
THURSDAY, November 12, 1891.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
l446O-Heilbron ct al. VS.. 76 L. & w. Co.
14,4S9-Heinlen VS.. Hebron ct al.
14,633-Erlanger VS.. DanieIson.
14,732-Switzer VS.. Baker
14,441-Hughes ct al. VS.. Ewing ct al.
IA, 442-Fresno National Bank VS.. Hawkins.
14,509-Lillis ct al. VS.. Emigrant Ditch Co.
14,579-Remmer VS.. Blasingame.
14,597-C. p. r. r. Co. vs.. Board of Equali-
zation of Fresno City.
14,604-Yancy VS.. Morton.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
14.6O6-Thorn vs. Grady.
14,6S4-Green VS.. County of Fresno.
14,713-Church VS.. Shanklin.
14,741-Freeman VS.. Hensley (as Sheriff..
ii, ,745-Bradford VS.. Parkhurst.
14,753-Barrett VS.. Austin.
14,573-Estate OF Rogers VS.. Maze.
IA, 4,6o3-Barnhart VS.. Fulkreth.
14,629-Stonesifer vs. KilbuTh eft al.
Ia, 4,63S-Mahony VS.. Bostwiok.
MONDAY, November 16, 1891.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
T52-Stinchfield vs. C1iIlis ct al
14,575-Kneirer VS.. Watrous.
14,59O-Estate of Hewitt VS.. Trustees First
Presbyterian Church.
14,616-Byefs VS.. Locke.
14,622-0ullahan ct al. Us. Baldwin ct al.
14,626-Krause VS.. Spiegel.
14,660-Watt ct al. VS.. Bradley.
14.6S5-Stockton c. II. and A. Works VS..
Glens Falls Insurance Company.
14.6S6-Stockton C. II. and A Works VS..
Hartford Fire Insurance Company.
.6S7-Stockton c. II. and A. Works VS..
Hamburg -Madgeburg Insurance Company
,6SS-Stockton c. II. and A. Works VS..
American Fire Insurance Co. of Philadelphia.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
14,z02-Cody VS.. Bean ct al
l4,412-Cain VS.. Cody
14,463--Kirinan ct al. VS.. Hunnewill ct al.
Ia 457-Moulton VS.. Harris.
IA, 4,47S-Marysville Electric L. and p. Co.
I4,738-Garber VS.. Gianella.
Ii, ,502-Steinhart ct al. VS.. National Bank
D. O. Mills u Co.
14.574-Burr VS.. Johnson ct al.
Id, ,672-Johnson VS.. Sweeny.
TUESDAY, November II, 1891.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
14,723-County of San Joaquin VS.. Budd
ct al
14,737-Doyle VS.. without.
Ia, 739-Loeke VS.. AIoulton eft al.
ii, ,744-Estate of Carpenter vs. Bailey ct al.
ii, I,746-Weber, as Administrative ct al VS.
Gill.