Brookings register. (Brookings, S.D.) 1890-1894, 1891-07-31
Commissioners Proceedings.

Ou uOOiOu OlC i l. do6CSSulCIlV vi
K. ]. Bake, of Alton twp, was low.
cred $40. He was not at home when
the assessment was made and it was
assessed too high.
Personal operty tax of VIM. Mil
Ter for the years 18S3.S4 charged
against lots 13 and IA, blk. 2. Skin.
ner's second addition to city of Brook.
Ings, was rebated.
The nw4; sec. 4.11O.49 was reduced
500 in value upon assessment OF
1891.
On motion Bank of Volga was as.
sessed to furniture $500 and mer.
chandise 1885, and it's stocks and
shares to remain at the figures set by
the town board.
On motion the report of H. V.
Hicks, superintendent OF the poor
iarm, was read and approved.
Refundment OF Geo. Dybdal was re.
jected.
Board reduced the value OF re4 sec.
7-11O-49 $1OO on assessment OF 1891.
Claim for reduction OF assess
ment OF assessment OF 1891 on
Elkton lots of Western Town Lot Co.
was rejected.
Refunded to Howard Vinegar of
Ekton road and school poll for
1880; non. resident.
On motion the p. p. tax Of P. G.
Paulson of Laketon for the years
1SS2-83 charged against the e2, sea
sec. and n2 ned sec. z all in town
112, range SO, was removed from said
lands. it being properly charged
against Mr.. Paulson's land in the
same township.
Board adjourned to $50 Tuesday.
Met pursuant to adjournment. All
present.
On motion the claim of Brown &
Saenger of $117.45, which had been
allowed at $11O.25 was reconsdered.
Moved and seconded that the bill be
allowed at $117.45. The ayes and
nays were called for. The vote stood
as follows: Allen Smith, aye; II. w
Allen aye; o. j. Bitterness and o. G..
Westrum nay.
The vote being q tie it emaiued with
the chairman to decide. He voted in
the affirmative, thus allowing the
claim at $117.45. The subject for
disagreement in above bill was q
claim of Brown & Saenger for $7.2O
in an order OF liquor affidavits above
contract price.
On motion the settlement with the
register of deeds was laid over to the
January meeting.
On motion N. H. Holden's assess
ment for 1891 on moneys OF banks
other than those whose capital is re-
presented by capital stock was raised
from $741 to S4l5O and his assess
ment on bank credits OF 1928 stricken
out.
On motion the valuation of the ne
or Sec. 13 lilac for the year 1890
was reduced S65, it being assessed un.
proportionately with neighboring
property.
Rebate OF John Anderson was re-
lecUed.
Rebated tax on s1-2 ne1-4 and lots
1 and 2, Sec. ITO 81 for 1890 double
assessment, ordered refunded p p tax
of 1882 to J. M. Rexford. Mr. Rex.
ford had no property in Trenton twp
said year.
Rebated tax of '84 on nw1-4 sec 1S.
100 40. not proved up; 1884 tax on
Sig sel-4 sec 3l-11O so double as
sessment; 1884 tax on part OF block Z
Petersons add to city OF Brookings,
double assessment; tax of 1885 on
nw14 SIC 32.1O9-4S, not proved up;
P tax OF Foiken for 1888 charg-
ed against the sci. 4 sec 31-112, so not
lien on said land.
Redeemed from sale the se1-4 sec IA
1850 for 1887 tax; said land belong
ing to South Dakota Agricultural
College, not assessable.
Redeemed nw1 se1-4 sec 29.11O-5O
tax of 'S3 and '94, double assessment
and erroniously sold; also se1-4 sec
SO 110.49 for 'S4 and 'S5. not proved
up.
Board reduced the valuation OF
nw1-4 sec 4-l1O-49 500 for 1891,
too high assessment.
Refunded to II. S. Murphy tax OF
's7 on lots l and and ell 2 mel 4 sec
1O-1O9 SO, said land was decided back
to the government, not assessable.
On motion the report of E F Bagley
p OF Elkton for or ending June ~,
1891 was approved and all fees al
lowed.
In case OF state vs John Doe ~:
EF Bagley justice es.......".....'....'.s2 g 3
Fines Observation-Disclosures. ~ W
VIM Anderson J P report for or end.
ing June 80 were approved and the
following fees allowed.
In case of state va Danl Hendricks;
Wm Anderson justice fees ....'.'..''"$ " y
Bound over to circuit court.
In case of state vs Will Pool.
| VIM Andpraon iustice fees 3 UU