Telegram-herald., 1891-06-24

sun Of slI-a. ses approved b. ths esAiraaAa
81 Year Co4mlsfse 81 ballela<s ~hs<s o. A.
sesl .ae 3 accept tue sane - correct. sAd re
oRalaena ta1 gsyAs8t.
The cain ref FRED ca Mas lsth. ISL, see Yase
- aad ~ 81 tAe DuateQ preeeeaia<s. Tor TAG
SAN Of Us. ~a.eh VS. allowed at 50. MAS &c
a13asflaeat cl a HnlfoFm per diem fer ths
yea foF aiIsrent sors al different times znd
seasons
Ias eiz.n referred GA Nov. .4th- Use. sSs
printed ree0rd PAGE -. for the son Of 81
10 TIE waTrea-Searf Asphalt PasaBg Co.
which was allowed az SIS. see PAGE q Of pfint
Ell record. Ire company has refused 60 &C
eept said allowances AID insists thai The eiainl
Is iass AZ SIP. makiag said claim stand as enc
Sill pendiag. Ihe claim referred en- Ney iIth,
$50. Tor the sua OF s. ior service as interpre-
Ter 10 Board Of Election aaa rejected. see
pag. 5lS printed record. said claim was ap-
proved by the 4lderaea OF said Board and
properly o. K. bs him. a. II seemed TO him nee
essary 10 have aR interpreter. Was this not
contingency for which the law has failed 20
provide aad should not the claim have beea
paid.
The claim referred on Sept. sth. $50. Sc
page o9i Of tue printed record Tor the sum oil
S.l5 was approved BY the alderman OF the
respective Board and property O. h. by HIM
When referred said claim MAS Withdrawn and
otherwise provided Tor not By the city.
b The claim referred on sept. sfth. lso. see
printed record pages so and 9i6. tor the sum
OF 50 Tor service rendered the city IN the Office
of the Director of the Poor and properly eerti-
Ned Co by him. said service having been rem
dcfed:the city. Should not she same have
been allowed aud padf
The claim referred on Dee. "a. lse9. for the
- ~ III smith A
Hurley. ana also the claim referred Jan. 18th.
lsse. Tor the sum OF 5. IN the ease OF Sparks
vs. Kennedy. see printed record. page 49,. SO.
ga and 10. These two claims were certified 10
their once by the Board of Fire AMI Police
Commissioners They Involved the principal OF
The eity sustaining the officers in the discharge
of theli duty and should have been paid the
legal questions raised in these claims as be
tween the city aud the county should be ad-
justed. II necessary. by an appeal 10 the courts
10 get ruling. As long as these claims stand
as they do, they stand much the same as
claims still pending. recapitulation OF the
within. showing the
Whole number of claims recommended
by the comptroller Il .3i3
Whole number OF claims referred TO com
Whole number of referred claims reported
correct as recomm ended by the COMB
oil
One only was paid for by a less sum than
recommended. which was sls.00. allowed at
$1,000. which was hot really a reduction but an
adjustment o. compensation for the year.
Four practically stand as still pending. repre-
senting n total amount OF $4,000. And four
stand rejected. representing a total amount of
$s,.U0. which in each case. however. were prop
eriy certified To and were recommended 10 me
and approved ty the alderman or proper ON
Ger. Trusting that the showing herein set
forth speaks for the past. 1t will be my earn
est endeayor to do as well in the future.
There Is nothing herein contained pertain.
ing TO such claims as were from time to time
reported without recommendation.
Respectfully submitted.
JAMES VASpENBEReK.
Comptroller.
Aid. 0Donnell moved that the communica-
ton bs accepted and printed In the council
proceedings.
Aid. Turner amended that 1t be referred to
Committee on Claims and Accounts.
Lost.
Yeas-Ald. Sproul. Turner-2.
Nays-AId. Anderson. Carpenter. Conger
Doyle. Dregge. Dunton. Emmer. Frost
Hauser. Kinney. Mahoney. Mills. O'Donnell.
Saunders. stein. Stokes. SprouI. Wurzburg
III.
Aid. O'Donnell's motion prevailed By the
following vote:
Yeas-Ald. Anderson. Carpenter. Doyle. Dreg-
&c. Dunton. Emmer. Frost. Hauser. Kinney.
Mahoney. Mills. 0'Donneil, Saunders. Stein.
Stokes. Turner. Wurzburg-lI
Nays-N one.