New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1891-02-13
TPOUBLES or BUSINESS MEN.
SEVERAL LARGE EXECUTIONS ISSUED IN FAVOR
OF THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK


OF THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK
nh, ~ vor,, Sro,tinr and Refining Company. at
NO SOC west-st. had two executions lssueu as"ins,
:, Yesterday for S1o623 favor Of the First Na'"al
Eank Of NewYork. Judgments were alSo eN.eIe"
AGAINST L. LissberCer d Co.. metal meichah's Vi W.
as Clif-st for S16,421. and against STROUD O W.
metal brokers formerly at No 104 John-st' for FL TO-
oil in favor Of the First National Bank, and In the
matter. ..-.ion -
Denutv sheriff Tracy yesterday took possession oi
the New. York smelling aud Refining Companys "Orh'
at NO. 5OG West-st. From the papers III Vnc '"o
Il, appears that on November H. 1855 the company
made its note PAYABLE on demand for S4I4oo' anu
| ON November IL 1883 another note payaole on ue
maud for a3o 600 These notes were incorsed bN
/ Iissbercer a. Co. There remained unpaid on theSo
notes with interest and costs S49OI Tor winch amount
the First National Bank yesterday TOOK Iudshel'''
The firm of stroud d Co made three notes VI I"'ii
months each dated June 10. 1880, for S24so' June
IL 1890 for $2,347 and July 2, 1880 Tor FZ''I'
all to the order Of L. Lissberser d. co. The-e ho''
were Endorsed by l.. Lissberger d Co. and the Ne"
York smelling and Refining Company and came mo
the pns,esslon of the First National Bank which yes
teriay entered judgment on them for $','10.
Tine other transaction loan OF S3'ooo on
April IL 500 to L. Lissbergcr d Co., for when inc
First National Bank has entered judgment for S3''"9'
At the Office Of Peabody. Baker Peabody, attorneys
| for the bank it said ycseriay that the matter
had been hanging for some time and the DAM IH'
decided to take judgment, and As far as ueS hhe"
| the notes all straight"
The New-York smelling and Refining Company was
mentioned 10 the recent dispatches from Baltimore IN
connection with the alleged forged accepances winch
were disclosed In that city. The company was IL
corpo-,ted i'm 1876 with capital stock Of S1OOOO,
and II is said is virtually owned by Lazarus Lssberger
and MS brotherinaw, Bernard Schultz, who compose
! the firm Of L. LssbergeT &c co. The company has an
extensive plant and did business, IT Is said, OF
inward Of a 81 900 900 year.
Mr. Lssberger has been in business for about thirty
years and was generally regarded bold and heavy
| operator lie was formerly Of Holmes d LisSbergcr,
who failed the panic Of 1873, with liabilities Of
! - 100000. lie continued business in his fathers
name but disaster again overlook the and the
| father Herman LisSberger made an assignment III
l.90 when the boom in iron rails burst With liabilities
of 5000 600 mainly TO bankers who had considerable
merchandise as collateral Several years ago Lazarus
was interested in railroad construction III FLORIDA, ana
VA, also said TO interested IN the COr1nth lead corner
I'm November, Ioeo Mr.. Schurtz became partner III
| ISL. 49, H.,
| William b. Howard yesterday entered three JudG
| ments aggIegatng S37 100 against the Central Con
| ,tructiOn Company in suits brought against thtt
| company George X. Sistares sons, and hOuden ~
Jenkins on three notes of $4,000 each, made by the
| comDany. two dated December 20, 1850, and The
Endorsed by defendants, George ID. Chapman and by
| Mir Howard. seven hundred and hity shares OF the
| hhepaug, Litchfed and Northern Railroad company
| we're mt up as collateral. MI Howard took up the
| notes and the collateral was sold, leaving balance
due him Of S37 400.