The Yazoo sentinel. (Yazoo City, Miss.) 1878-1916, 1891-09-24
Circuit Court

The following eases have been disposed OF
since our last issue
| A Austin 4 c.. VS. WIN Henry Judgment
by default plaintiff represented by VIII.
| liams 4 Williams
Bambcrger Bloom & Co. and Hin Shoe
Company vs. i w Cooper; judgments for
plaintiffs represented by Barnett, Dreaming
contra.
DIV Randolph w Davidow & Foley and 7
Hsnneberg, Judgment for plaintiff reprsen-
I. Il 4 Clark vs. Buck Subbett Judgment by
default. Campbell for plaintiff
.E TClark vs. Emanuel Thompson, same as
above.
Rosenberg, Flexner & Mendell w VIM
Henry judgment BY default Barnett for
plaintiff
The Delta Bank vs. l. Moore; Judgment
by default Barnett for plaintiff
A G Levy & Co vs. w Cooper Judgment
for plaintiff, represented by Campbell, Dren-
ming contra.
wv Champlin vs. Willie March Judgment
for plaintiff, represented by Campbell.
Champlin VS. Louis Hicks Judgment by de-
fault. Campbell for plaintiff.
w + Cummins VS. ] B Wilson Judgment
for plaintiff represented by Henry * Rich
ardson, Barnett and Thompson contra.
Jas Z Brooks VS. y. a nj. v. r. r. Co, YER
Dreaming Barnett contra.
Geo W Everett Va Louis wise ct al Judgment
for defendant Campbell for plaintiff, Ep-
person and Barnett contra.
Fargason 4 Co, vs.. VIM. Henry, judgment
for plaintiffs, represented by Harlow, Barnett.
contra.
lst National Bank V X @ Hudson, b n
I3eamon surety judgment for plaintiff.
Nm Grant 81 al rs B NJ Beamon judg-
ment for PLAINTIFF, represented by Campbell
~RosenthaII Millinery Co VS. T Hanneberg
~ for plaintiffs represented by Har-
1T contra.
riield Brown VI ] Burnett Crane.
ut Judgment on plea In abatement for
defendant Hudson aud Campbell for plain
tiff Harnett contra
Rosebrough Sons, vs. b s Cowan; judgment
for plaintiff, representedby Harlow Barnett
DC Love Sheriff vs. Y a vRRCo.,
judgment for plaintiff, represented by Camp
bell. Barnett contra.
j j White vs. Henry and Yves Vaughan
for plaintiff, represented by Nc
knight. Dreaming pontra.
State VS. Sam Digs, charged with the
murder of Hester Thompson, verdict mot
guilty" Diggs was defended by Mr. A. 4.
Perrin, an appointment made BY the Court.
He served his client with great fidelity sand
ability, and 80 conducted his defence al 10
convince the jury that he was not guilty, the
Jury being out only few minutes. This
worst cases before the Court The victory for
Mr.. Perrin Is one on which he may well con-
yratulate himself
State VS.. Alex Montgomery pIeaiof guilty
o manslaughter and sentenced to five years
Imprisonment IN the. penitentiary. d, r,
Barnett and q. A. Wilson defended Mr..
wilson making forcible appeal, for the
emency Of the court,
Stats VS.. Wm, Morris plea Of guilty to
and sentenced to ten years in
he penftentiary. Williams a. Williams as
listed in the prosecution and Hon. G, H. Per-
ins defended and made forcible plea for
lis client.
State rs. Sam Melton violating the local
ption law plea Of guiltyland fined $25.
State vs.. Ike Beck violating local option |
aw, guilty, fined S25 and one month IN jail |
Iowman defended
state VI. Sam Iyersnn, plea OF guilty OF petit |
lroeny and fined $500, Barnett defended. |
State vs. Robt. Houston violating local |
ptiOn law. two cases. not guilty" Williams /
J. Williams defended
State W. Darius Phillips. charged with /
bandoning baby, guilty and sentenced TO
oneiyear. Williams Williams
offended.
State vs.. II Blaekman; violating local
pti0n and buying seed potton; not guilty.
Williams n Wiilalne defended,
state vs. ! N Middleton, two cases fined
each 1880.
Suite W. Henry Bowles; charged with kill
x John Brooks; plea OF guilty Of man
aughier and sentenced TO one year in peni-
military, Campbell defended.
State vs.. Richard Stewart grand larceny
nifty and one year In penitenti8ry.
State vs.. Josh Singleton; grand larceny;
uiltv and sentenced 10 six months in jail.
State vs.. Abram Harris; plea Of guilty
and sent to penitentiary for
We years Barnett defended.
ScUtt Bgker; carrying o1nfealetl Weapons
aed sga Rafneft delclded,
state W, Henry stephens; charged with
ting rs agent for buyer Of whisky; guilty
ID fined 5000. Harlow defended.