The Kinsley graphic. [volume] (Kinsley, Kan.) 1890-1940, 1891-06-05
M'KiNLEYsM IN CUSTOMS.

M'kiNLETiSM 80 CUSTOMS.
New York Custom House omesrs Trying to
KIN Foreign TraS5s-Ecxtrs Duties. Pen
aittes and Delays-An Angry Importer
Mckinley is dead politically, for the
time being. but his soul goes marching
on The war which he declared
against our foreign commerce is being
prosecuted vigorously and ruthlsssly by
the New York custom house officers
There are loud and freq usnt com plants
from importers against the unnecessary
delay in getting their goods through
the official mill at the custom house;
and they claim that through these I'M
explained delays the sale of their goods
is lost The merchants in interior
cities grow weary of waiting and finally
countermand their orders, leaving the
importer in the Iurch-
One curious provision in the McKin-
ley law is that whenever there is any
doubt as to which of two duties applies
to any article the higher duty is TO be
assessed. Not long ago a merchant in
New York imported some $500 worth of
wells for making gloves. The subOr-
dinate officers In the custom house
were in doubt, and so selected the
higher duty, making it 81, 600. But
this was too steep for the collector; he
reduced the duty to some 5000
Another way in which the customs
officers are applying McKinlyism is in
arbitrarily raising invoices in order to
make the duties heavier, and in impOs-
ing fines for pretended undervaluations
of goods.
Not long ago a New York firm of
clock manufacturers received from Paris
a small invoice of marble clock cases,
which were invoiced at the same price
that the firm had been paying for
years and which had always been passed
at that price by the custom house Off
GERS. The firm fits up these cases with
It's own c1Ock-wOriS. Soon after this in
voice arrived the arm was notified that
it's value had been raised 25 per cent.
1--WE appealed" says the treasurer of
| the firm, land on reappraisal prices
were reduced on some patterns to the
invoice and on some to about II per
cent. above the invoice. We appealed
again, and were told by the board be-
| fore whom we appeared that we were
| buying these goods cheaper than the
| law declared to be market rates; that,
| buying but few patterns-by the hun
| dred at a time-we were getting lower
prices than a dealer could get who
bought by the dozen, and that the price
the latter would pay was the market
value at which the goods should pay
duty. We were assured that there was
no implication against the honesty of
our entry.
ION this re-appeal the last figures were
! confirmed, advancing prices about II
per cent on some of the patterns. The
invoice was a small one-Only $3.50
and we made no further objection.
1.-THE duty on these goods previous to
the last tariff was so per cent. The last
tariff increased it to so per cent Our
entry was advanced $40, on which the
additional duty was S23. We received
bill from the custom house of 1929,
$1O6 being charged as a penalty, and we
are advised by counsel that there is nc
remedy We must pay.
The treasurer we'll denounces this as
down right robbery 1.-The spirit OF
the law seems to be" he adds, that an
importer is thief, and is to be treated
accordingly. Never in my twenty-siz
years business in New York have 1 en-
countered any thing which has given
me such a feeling of outrage or made
me SO indignant"
The importer is but an agent of the
people who buy his goods; the injustice
and the hardships which McKinleyis ism
heaps upon him it heaps upon the
American consumers of his goods. Dc
| those consumers like it?