Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1891-11-24

AIS p. m. At dark the jury were dis
charged until 9 a. N. to-day.
The injunction proceeding OF the Mail
publishing company VS.. Max Elser ct al.
was reset for $3.50 to-day.
No case filed in either district court.
FoRTy-EIGHTH DISTRICT HON. n. A. STEAD
MAN, JUDGE.
After setting the docket for the next
week, his honor transacted the following
business.
PAL Robert Mozart VS.. A. B. Norton,
passed.
1886. ]. L. Edwards vs.. Missouri Pacific
Railway Company, passed.
1856. Charles Martin vs.. j. B. Watkins
ct al, on trial at adjournment.
THE JURY DOCKET.
Setting of the jury docket Seventeenth
district Ito be tried by Judge Steadman) for
week commencing Novem Der 30, 1891.
6297. Zane Cetti VS.. H. H.Lacy ct al.
6332 American Land and /. Company vs..
Mary Z. Gee ct al
6342 J B. Collier VS.. A. G. Cason.
31O3. City of Fort Worth VS.. NJ. B. Lloyd
ct al.
1912. Llano Live Stock Co. VS.. Texas and
Pacific Railway Co. ct al
G013. Llano Live Stock Co. VS.. Texas and
Pacific Railway Co. ct al.
5661. NJ j. THOMPSON VS.. c. G. TeVis
ct al.
1882. NATL Bank of Jefferson VS.. Texas
Invest. Co., Limited, ct al.
By Jake Johnson VS.. S. Z. Holmes ct al.
1916. John Mitchell vs.. Geo. B. Brown.
41S4. J. r Johnson Us. E. E. Chase.
1890. Joe Nugent VS.. W. r. King ct al.
1919. Geo. W. Mcmillan VS.. Western IN
ion Telegraph &c.
47O3. c. ID. Johnson VS.. f. W. g. D. C.
Ry. Co.
1872. W. G. Eustis VS.. Merchants Ma
tional Bank.
1866. H. C. Peace vs.. Mark Evans.
1914, G. +. Baughman VS.. f. w. 81 D. G.
Ry. Co.
BY order of court. LR. TAYLOR,
District Clerk
Setting of the jury docket, Forty-eighth
district Ito be tried by Judge Beckham),
for week commencing November 60 1891
MONDAY.
2Sl1. R. Y. Mangum vs.. Texas and Pa
cific Railway Company.
1892 r. H. Kirby ct al. vs.. C. F. Estel
ct al
1916 j. S. Murray VS.. Missouri Pacific
Railway Company.
5277. Hazel Creeland vs.. Gulf, Colorado
and Santa Fe Railway Company.
TUESDAY.
1857. F. w. Bradley VS.. C. j. Walden
ct al.
1905. E. C. Pendery VS.. Gulf, Colorado
anu Santa q IslllWd y OOlllJdLy
1859. NJ. NJ. Harlan VS.. Gulf, Colorado
and Santa t'e Railway Company.
1897. NJ. N. Harlan VS.. Atchison. Topeka
and Santa BE Railway Company ct al.
WEDNESDAY.
1904. City of Fort Worth VS.. Sam Evans
ct al.
5JS4. G. W. Hewitt VS.. Fort Worth and
Denver City Railway Company.
1882 Nancy NJ Young vs. Fort Worth
and Rio Grande Railway Company.
THURSDAY.
5505. NJ. a. Ledbetter VS.. c. L. Murphy
ct al.
6O1O C. Churchill vs.. North Side Street
Railway Company.
FRIDAY.
1862. r. d. Skinner VS.. Fort Worth Street
Railway Company.
1852 j. P Smith ct al vs.. NJ. c. Bowles
ct al
5Ol5. ]. D. Kittrell VS.. S. W. Fordyce, re-
ceiver.
BY order of court. L. r. TAYLOR,
District Clerk.
COUNTY COURT.
Non-jury cases disposed Of in county
court yesterday:
Elliott & Roe vs.. Craft g. jaeger; judg-
nent for plaintiff for S62S.9S.
State National Bank VS.. H. Burton ct al. {;
dismissed at plaintiffs cost
Lakewood ct al. vs.. State National Bank;
dismissed at plaintiffs cost.
2. \. McGaughey VS.. NJ. Matklu; dis
missed at PLAINTIFFS cost.
The Artesian Ice Company VS.. J. II.
Buchanan; Judgment for plaintiff for
;221. -.
Blumenthal Bros. VS.. A J. Anderson, dis
missed at plaintiffs cost.
H. W. Wallace VS.. St. Louis, Arkansas
md Texas Railway; dismissed at plain
ifs cost.
Tho Tan,,+ c+r;br,nrr cboo Cor,on-r.
\ D. Smith, garnishee; Judgment for
defendant
f. Ward VS.. Western Union Telegraph |
Company; dismissed at cost of plaintiff.
Fort Worth Granite Roofing Company !
s. North Side Street Railway Company;
dismissed at cost of plaintiff.
A. J. Roe VS.. Fort Worth Cement Com |
'any; judgment for plaintiff.
a. J. Anderson VS.. Frank eide; dis
missed.
William Newsom & Sons VS.. Bateman |
Bros. judgment for plaintiff for s911.92.