The record-union., 1891-06-18
IN BANK.
= II : - t.
MnNnAV Tf1na

IN BANK.
MONDAY, June / 3, 1891.
Court convened at 10 A. NJ. Present-Beatty,
c. J., presiding; Mcfarland, j., Garoutte, j.,
Harrison, j., Paterson j., Snarpstein, j., Nc
CaIvey, Deputy Clerk; Washburne, Bailiff
20,S49-Ex parte >. II. Hall-Ordered that
a writ OF habetls corpus issue herein as prayed
for, returnable before the Supreme Court In
bank Friday, June 19, 1891, at 10 o'clock
a. NJ
14,46S-The People ex rel. Adams VS.. City
of Oakland-On motion of Olney, ordered that
cause be placed on bank calendar for July "a,
1891.
14545-Bourn VS. Board of Examiner
Upon motion OF Devlin, ordered that an alter
native writ OF mandate be issued herein, re-
turnable before the Supreme Court in bank
Wednesday, August IL, 1891.
IA, 14,5l1-Guarantee Loan and Trust Com
pauy VS.. Rix-Upon motion OF Collins, or
dered that the motion TO dismiss the appeal
herein be and the same is hereby denied for
the reason that no appeal has ever been taken.
90, ,s42-People VS.. Scott-Argued by Har6er
for appellant, Gesford for respondent and sub
mitte1.
14,49s-Cody VS.. Murphy-Argued by At
torney-General for respondent, Fox for ap-
pelant and submitted.
527-Visher vs. Smith--Argued by FL
liott for petitioner, Campbell for respondent
and submitted
l4,3S7-Cohey VS.. Lyman-Ordered appel
liant nave ten days to fle his brief herein. BY
the court.
toner have ten days further time TO file his
brief and defendant have thirty days 10 file
his briet in reply. BY the court.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
TUESDAY June 16. 1891.
13.243-City of Eureka VS.. Diaz ct al-The
Judgment and order are reversed and the cause
Is rernanded with directions To sustain the
demurrer To the complaint. Paterson j. We
concur: Harrison, j., Garoutte J.
,252-Respini VS.. Porta-Judgment af-
firmed. Paterson, j. We concur: Harrison,
j., Garoutte, j.
14o9o-Hyde VS.. Boyle ct al.--By the court
-Good cause appearing, IL is ordered that
Henry c. Hyde, the respondent, show cause,
If any he may have, before this court on Fri
day. the 18th day of June. 1891, at o o'clock
In the forenoon, why an order should not be
granted permitting the appellants in the above
entitled action TO nile an undertaking on APP
peal therein, and to Tx the amount thereofby
the court, to stay the execution OF the judg-
ment therein pending the appeal from the
order appealed from, and all orders made
therein based upon said Judgment until the
final decision OF this court OH said appeal
Audrt is further ordered that all proceedings
upOn said Judgment be stayed until the hear
ing and determination by this court OF this
order. And II is further ordered that upon
the said appellants filing an undertaking on
appeal In said action, In a sum to be fixed by
this court, and the approval thereof upon the
iustification OF the sureties thereon by one of
the Justices of this court, that all proceed
| ings upon said judgment be and the same are
! hereby staid until the final hearing and de-
cfsion of the court upon said appeal 1t is
further ordered that u copy of this order lie
| forthwith on this 10th day OF June 1891
| served upon the Sheriff of the county of San
Matap, state of California, and like copy