Idaho news. (Blackfoot, Idaho) 1887-1891, 1891-01-10
THE FIRST TERM
OF The District Court of The 9Th
judicial District.


judicial District.
The first term of the district court |
for the 5th judicial district began at
Blackfoot, Monday, January 9Th. His
Honor, Judge Standrod, presiding. |
Clerk A. L. Richardson was at his
desk, and Sheriff w. A. Woodin and
deputies in attendance upon the court.
The following attorneys were present:
District Attorney Winters and ]. Ed.
Smith, Eagle Rock; Hawley & Reeves,
Rapp & Beale, T. NJ. Stewart, Sample
Orr and E. S. Whittier, Blackfoot; j.
B. Miller, German & Savidge, and E.
p. Blickensderfer, Pocatello, and III.
w. Smith, Ogden. Court Stenogra-
pher r. I. Morgan was also present as
was likewise court bailiff Ed Watson
Judge Standrod is disposing of the
business of the calandar rapidly and,
we believe, with much satisfaction to
all parties interested The following
are the proceedings from day to day:
MONDAY JANUARY 5TH.
Order issued to sheriff to summon
90 grand jurors to appear on the 7th
inst at 10 o'clock a m
Order issued to summon "a trial
jurors to appear on 8th inst at 10
O'Clock a. m.
Peter W. Boqua vs. A. NJ. Carter
continued.
/ A. L. Butterlull VS. w. Fl. Behle, set
for trial 9TH inst. at 10 o'clock
1 Herbert Horsley VS. T. j. Matthews,
demurrer to complaint withdrawn.
Chas. Peterson VS. Katie Peterson
continued.
Following cases dismissed:
Ellsworth VS. Mcfarland
Cloonan VS. Cloonan.
Dick VS. Bacon.
King, ct at VS. Stuart
Demurrer to complaint argued and
submitted.
Same order in the following cases
Briggs VS. Erickson.
Bunting VS. Glasgow.
Mitchell VS. Moon.
Jesse McAllister VS. Armour Cattle
Company, demurrer over-ruied,
TUESDAY.
Demurrer to complaint over-rule6
IN the following cases and defendants
given leave 10 amend, to-wit.
Ball VS. Mackey.
Bunting & Co., VS. Glasgow.
Briggs VS. Erickson.
A. G. Hays vs. H. c. Glasgow, ct al
Plaintiff given leave to ile amended
complaint
Francis Gibbon VS. Martha Gibbon
, divorce granted the plaintiff
/ Goodwin VS. Egan, tried by a iur.
, and submitted TO the court.
, Henry Dunn VS. w. F. Fisher, ct al
demurrer to complaint submitted.
, WEDNESDAY.
!, Grand Jury empanelled with Chas
w. Bergman rs foreman.
+ George Goodwin VS. Harry Egar
!, Judgment for plaintiff for possession
), OF property and $3.50 damage.
= Fitzpatrick, Koch Dry Goods Co
Il vs H. o. Stuart, judgment of non sui
l. entered.
g Ferdinand Westheimer & Sons, "
! D. d. Wright, demurrer to complain
y Over.ruled and defendant given to th
y 18th inst to answer.
Chas. Rebstock VS. Hugh Macke,
Judgment for plaintiff for $596,73.
W. f. Mellick VS. Neponsett Ian
10 and Live Stock Co, motion to s,
% default argued and submitted.
i. A. f. Battersill VS. DR.. w. FL. Beh
tried by the court and submitted,
By agreement the following cas-,
to be tried by d. d. Wright, sittin
:. rs Judge:
z Ed Harrington VS. JAS, Gale.
2 Ed Harrington VS. Frank Hubbar
. Ed Harrinuton VS. Eliza Waterma
George Hart VS. Deborah A. Hal
tried and submitted to the court.
THURSDAY.
81 T S. Cromwell VS. John ]. Guhee
- assessor, demurrer over-ruled, defe
81 dant given 10 days to amend.
81 NJ. d. Wells VS. Wm. L, Fisher, co
% tinued.
Goldsmith 4 Co. vs H. O. Stua
g6 verdict for defendant.
81 j. G. Madden VS. j, S, Hendricks
ss default of defendant entered,