The sun., 1891-06-02

e0S% %eS ali 19e as
Sy ST. bshssioP Sas ss
IL. Ss
Ths % p.rsons Who esne had observss * @ s,r Williams
whole matter Cefore Gen. owen Williams and
Lord coysntSy %smoer. Of The TI.Gny Croft
sssn yen ~ the london S oSa IL se
cordanee: It is snDposed. with statement
fsT EN- rss 4 1s in!srSsw 1sSws with Sir William Cor
and Gen. Williams was short and hurried b.
% rins. After repudiatius the accusation With
sS"rn and being Ell warned 1hst shS prinse
many many words T but @ hm:sf in ihe HANGS 81 ord
Coventry and Gen: Williams. claimine and the
lsnas esak 'has eSR w he his
!ion: He sspoffs With extreme earnsstne:s; 70:
SSRns'1k Sm az sirordin9 NJ H. Close % kae~leIse WI" q
iiis character. dwelling on III. unhlem.
a aS as s oce1 as Of an sans.s Ens rssoa T
ilyo witnesses aG1inMst ~ yon 7 and he Terminated
ovetwbelm,ne-there, are flSc to one asaipst
liam, was recalled. 70 ind Tic PRINCE gone. and
Lord Coventry and Con. Owen Williams the
Gny ns 81 as hhsS sSS %ess led
:nforcsd upon hin, shat lhoro was no nlterpa.
dhe -xIremity.. siiIi shrugged in the tolls.
The nature .oi Of the snare ~ flashed ;pscn
are Understood 70 Be lirm 10 Their recolicsfion
oXurossion. while Sir William Gordon-Cnm-
ming has 10 Iomembrance to that effect; The
rsiicit statement in tic minute OF proceedinss
lint Sir William, signed ths u nunderiaking In the
@ 81 su "' s dHf ssrss nss
formal eSnstrucsion Sir William rspSdiates; "G
and 4 VIII be seen that the unasrtaaklnR,I9ss
ss yea ss2 9sn sign p S estss
Ham MAS set % It's ssn".ure ose 70 .So fcoSns pr
.n . T.. ns sS sy y: !ss.: s;.
Win rsi:fenos e sssa;.!,%a whsa SsI S.sn MAD:
I;..'ss L. s md ,S ssDIs%Ss
never to play cards again W.s viz =: duseous. xs
!"The deed donc. Sir William In a measure
WS lie wsaa %as @ So Done Vie
tho papsr w ho had Signe ne and was toa that i
d sfs whs s af n.ysd ysa s.s
tuSuts Vblltluk vut ia! nVoUIuto NUbb0ut&OU pu
tho rartof whist hRbitl6 would excite COM
mont emh sNrmtse. In reply he was referred
10 the the literal terms of the undertaking.
I,n the Glowing morning he lett ranb by Croft.
Tint day leiters were addressed BY him 10 tho
Prince. to Lord Coventry. and to Gen. Williams.
protesting AGAINST The cruel dilemma In which
a momehtHry panic Ind involved hiu,. con-
scions as he was that tho undertaking he had
been SO mad as To sign constituted q virtual
Ad n issiop OF guilt. renudiatinQ. however, that
and frmiy resssertins. his inno.
csnce OF the accusation made against him.
The tenor of the reply. which was signed by
the Prince. lord Coventry. and Gen. Williams.
was to the effect that there had been no alter.
native for him but to sign the document, that
10 the OF silence aud
Whatever 6ir William may or may not have
done. few pAreons contend that he has been
fairly treated bv those Nom bors OF the Tranby
question. and pledged themselves on honor 10
sssIsSs upon ,hs signing ~ him g, ses
ihsir. words. and tho events her. mar.
rated became public properly In London
last winter. A Tegimental inquiry WAS ex-
pected. and many Of sir williams frends
hoped that he would be thus tried by three OF
his fellow officers In tho Guards. All such pos.
sibllittes were axtin9uished, however. by the
action OF Sir William IN bringing Q snit for
Elander against Mr.. and Mrs. LYcstt Green,
Mr.. md Mrs. Arthur Wilson. and Mr.. Berke.