The Newberry herald and news. (Newberry, S.C.) 1884-1903, 1891-09-03

the Government to stretch its powers tc
very dangerous extent, and can secure
practically that elastic medium which
the Government cannot furnish. il
seems, without going into the broker
age business?
2. The trade in futures has been car
ried to a great excess and has often
Injured business. So far as it is used for
purely speculative purposes, itlsa great
curse. But is the evil inherent in the
system itself, or is it but an Incident
What special harm is there in a farm
er's making a contract with buyer to
sell his crop to him in the fall at fixed
rate? Shall a farmer be prevented from
securing advances in Charleston on the
promise of shipping so many bales a.
such price, and then, if prefers, pay
ing the price instead of delivering the
cotton? Shall a manufacturer not be per-
nitted to contract 70 deliver q certain
number of bales OF cloth to China in
six months? These are in principle pre-
cisely the same as the transactions on
Wall street.
There may be sharp set of rascals
in Wall street, but may there not be an
equally sharp set of rascals, perhaps,
with antagonistie interests to watch
them? Each crowd has its correspond
ents through the land gathering crop
statistics. Between the two most accu-
rate reports are obtained. And the
Fairfield farmer can, if he inquiries,
learn as much about the crop as any
body else. The price, after all in the
long run is regulated by demand and
supply. Sometimes the yield battles all
calculation, as, for instance, this year;
but it can easily be seen how much
wider the speculation would have been
if there had not been this systematic
collection of statistics. Years ago there
was at least fifteen cents pound differ
ence in the price of cotton at Winns-
boro and New York. What is the
difference to-day? When we choke off
the gamblers" we throw the burden Of
collecting facts on the Government, or
on the producers themselves, who have
other work to do. It costs money to
get crop reports and the people must
pay either directly by tax or subscrip-
ton, or Indirectly through prices. Fur
thermore, in view of the present great
glut of cotton, is it not probable that
the price is kept where it is only be-
cause a lot of spectators have beer
caught in future and are bulling the
market to save themselves from ruin?
Otherwise, there is no special reason
why cotton now on hand should De
sold at all. Here is proof again, it seems
that even an evil often has its compen-
sating good.
To prevent the sale of futures alto
gether would be to paralyze all credit
transactions, for unless the law be so
bombproof as to prevent all
future sales whatever, it will find some
loophole for escape. 1t is dangerous
stretch of power in government to tell
a man he shall not buy anything fol-
future delivery. Lawsz too, may be
imperative, but unless uphelfd BY pub
lie opinion, juries will not enforce theFfaes
Would it not be better to endeavor
to regulate such sales than forbid
them?
8. The present Silver Act of Congress
does these things: First, it keeps the
silver dollar on a par with the gold
dollar, when the bullion in it 25 cents
cheaper. Second, it adds about S70,-
100000 year to our currency. Third,
it uses all the silver that is mined in
this country. Fourth, it gives the Gov
ernment, that is the public at large, all
the profit arising from coming IS cents
worth of silver bullion into a dollar
coin. What is there in all this to
"condetnn?" Suppose the free coinage
of silver. which is demanded" would
take the profit of coinage from the pubic
and give it to the silver miners, and
allow Europe and Mexico to "dump"
their surplus silver over here at big
profit and then run the risk of having
our gold leave the country, r; of sill
YER dollars remaining with US, which
the world refuses to considel as worth
dollar when We go to pay for our i'm
ports, would this be a much better law
than the one that has been "con-
demned?" This is what very many of
the world, even of those who are not
"goldbugs," believe would be the effect
of free coinage of silver in the United
States.
4. Alien ownership of land is becon-
ing an evil, that is to say, ownership Of
large tracts of land. We may consider
whether it is better to have 30 market
for land or to sell it to some foreigner.
For instance, is it better to leave the
water power undeveloped or
sell it to an English syndicate? Had
we rather do without railroad in
Fairfield than allow foreign capital to
build and own it? Ifan Englishman
comes along and offers you ten dollars
an acre for farm which you have been
unable to sell to a fellow-citizen for
fye dollars would you think the law
TO. bidding alien ownership Of land a
good or bad thing? After syndicate
had developed Catawba Falls would
you be willing to tax yourself to enable
the State to acquire it by sale from
alien owners? Do you desire to in
crease your taxes to enable the General
Government to 'itake DOSSeSSiOnN of