Los Angeles herald., 1891-04-17
y REDONDO BEACH HOTEL. <
TN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS AN
1 peles County. Stale of california;

TN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS AN
Il gees County, State of California.
Charles NJ Plum, George Schonewald and
Edwin b. Mastick, surviving Trustees of the
James Lick Trust, plaintiffs, VS.. George R.
Limited, a Corporation organized and existing
under and by virtue of the laws of Great Britain,
The Santa Catalina Development Company.
Joint Stock Companies Acts, 1862 to 1889.
John Medley Stuart, George Q. Ford, Frank o.
Whitley and Patrick o'Neil, defendants.
Angeles county, State of California, and the
complaint filed in said county OF Los Angeles,
in the office of the clerk of said Superior Court.
The people of the State of California send
greeting to George Il. Shatto, he International
Mining syndicate, Limited, a corporation
organized and existing under and by virtue of
the laws of Great Britain, The Santa Catalina
Development Company, Limited, company
incorporated under the Joint stock Companies
Acts, s62 to 1889, John Medley Stuart, George
o. Ford Frank o. Whitley and Patrick O'Neil,
defendants.
You are hereby required to appear in an
action brought against you by the above named
plaintiffs in the Superior Court of the county of
Los Angeles, State of California, ana to answer
the complaint filed therein within ten days
exclusive of the day. of servicel after the
service on you of this summons, if served
within this county, or If served elsewhere
within thirty days, or Judgment by default will
be taken against you according to the prayer OF
said complaint.
The said action is brought to obtain decree
of this court for the foreclosure OF mortgage
described in the said complaint, and executed
by the said George R. Shatto on the 11th day
of August, 1887, to secure the payment of five
certain promissory notes OF even date with said
mortgage, each for the sum OF S26,666: :66, pay
able respectively in one. two, three, four and
FIVE years after the date thereof by said George
R. Shatto to Richard 5. Floyd, Charles NJ. Plum.
George Schonewald and Edwin b Mastick,
Trustees, ETC., or majority OF them or the sur
vivors of them, and payable only in gold coin
of the United States, with interest thereon at
the rate of six per cent per annum from
d,fA r.nfd rabl rtAp tnll
and if not so paid to be compounded with
the principal and bear the same rate of interest
as the principal. All of said notes are now due
under the terms of said notes and mortgage by
reason of the failure of the payment of interest
thereon, as provided in said notes and mortgage
upon which said notes there now remains due
and unpaid the sum of $I15,l S5. "a, together
with interest thereon at the rate of per cent.
per annum, from November 1lth, 1890, said
interest to be compounded with the principal
every three months and bear the same rate of
interest as the principal.
That the premises conveyed by said mort
gage, Except that portion thereof heretofore
released from the lien of said mortgage by in
strument in writing duly executed by Richard
S. Floyd, Edwin b. Mastick, George Schone-
wald and Charles NJ. Plum. trustees of the
James Lick Trust, dated the 9TH day of Novem-
ber, 1883, and recorded in book 20 of releases,
page 262, records of Los Angeles county,
copy of which said release is attached to the
complaint filed in the above entitled actionl,
may be sold and the proceeds applied to the
payment of the amount remaining due and un.
paid under safd promlSSOry notes. together with
attorneys fees in a sum equal to five per cent.
on the amount found due to plaintiffs and costs
in this action. That all said sums may be made
payable in gold coin of the United States; that
said sale may be made for like gold coin; and
if it appear from the sheriif's return that there
is balance due to the plaintiffs after applying
all the moneys applicable thereto to the
payment of the amount found due and
payable as aforesaid, that the defendant
George R. Shatto may be adjudged to pay such
deficiency in like gold coin, and that plaintiffs
may hove execution therefor, and also that the
defendants and all persons claiming by, through
or under them, or either of them, may be barred
and foreclosed of all right title, claim lien,
equity of redemption and interest in and to said
mortgaged premises; and also that receiver be
appointed to take possession of the land upon
which said mortgage Is lien to collect the
rents and profits thereof, and lease control and
manage the same during the pendency of this
actien, and for further and other relief. Refer
ence is had to the complaint for further partic
ulars.
And you are hereby notified that if you fail
to appear and answer the said complaint as
above required. the said plaintiffs will apply to
the court for the relief demanded in said com.
plant.
Given under my hand and the seal of the Su-
perior Court of the county of Los Angeles, state
of California this 14th day of February, in the
year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred
and ninety-one.
IS AL 7. II. WARD, Clerk.
By A. W. SEAvER, Deputy.
John D. Bicknell, attorney for plaintiffs
4-3-fr10t