The morning call. [volume] (San Francisco [Calif.]) 1878-1895, 1891-03-06

their pledges, and some Of them Will vote
for the people and against the posses To-
morrow.
Dibble has utterly failed in his attempt to
bind the caucus vote for his measure, and
two of the members who were numbered
among his stanchest adherents TODAY an
nouncpd that they would vote Tor the meas
ure Endorsed by THE CALL and the people.
PREFERENCES FOR SENATOR.
There is little doubt that the fight for the
toga will between Estee aud relton, ana at
this writing it would require the gift of
prophecy to decide which OF them VIII be
the victor. Your correspondent interviewed
every member of the Senate with the eX-
eeption OF Wilson. who Is absent, this morn
ing as to his choice for the SenatorShlp,
with the following result:
Bailey R.), San Jose-Don't care to tell.
Banks (R.), San Francisco-First choice
FELTON,.
Britt 3D., San Francisc0-S. NJ. White.
Broderick (R), San Francisco = First
choice Senator, Tom Maheri second choice.
Byrnes R.) San MateO-Estee, FELTON, or
Blanchard.
Campbell (R), Solano-Estee or FELTON,,
De Young isn't in it.
Campbell R), SlskIyou-Any one but
Carpenter (R) Los Angeles-I decline to
express my choice.
CrandalI (R.l, Santa Clara-I decline to
answer.
Dargie (R.). Alameda FELTON,.
De Long RI, Marin-NO choice.
Dcnison R.), Aiameda-Ifl had choice
It would be FELTON,.
Dray (R.) Sacramento-Senator Heacock
first choice, second choice ES.ee.
Everett (R), San Franclsco-No choice.
Flint (R), Mono-Senator Campbell OF
Fraser (R). Placer-BIanchard. Estee or
FELTON,.
Goucher d., Fresno-Stephen NJ. White.
Bamill d., San Frarcisco-Any good
Democrat.
Harp TD.), Modesto-A good Democrat.
Heacock RI Santa Barbara-Estee.
Langford 3D., San JOaQuin-Senator OS-
from.
Maher (R,), San Francisco-No choice.
Mahoney (R), San Francisco-General
Barnes.
McComas R) Los Angeles-Decline to
answer.
MCGOWAN (R.l, Humboldt-Estee.
Preston RI Nevada-Decline to answer.
He is said to favor Blanchard.
Ragsdale (R.), Yolo-HeaeOck, Estee or
FELTON,.
SeawelI Cd, Mendocino-
Shippee (R.), Butte-Bianchard.
Simpson (R.), Administration.
Sprague RI. YOlo-Estee.
StTee,er (R), San Bernardino-Estee.
VOORHEES, (R), Amadnr-Blanchard.
w. IL. Williams d., San Francisco
Goucher.
G. H. Williams R), San Francisco-De
Young first ON account of that circular, sec
ond Estee.
COUNTY STATISTICS.
The proposition to organize the county of
San JaclutO out of a portion of San Diego
County came before the Senate to-day, and
with it came the following interesting state
ment from the Assessor of San Diego: Il,
e. Ii. Shepard, Assessor for and in San
Diego County, State of California, do find
after careful examination of the assess
ment-relIs for the year 1S9O-9l that the fol
lowing amount of property comprises the
total value of all that portion of San Diego
County lying north Of the second parallel in
said county: SIS, 4t4, 073, less railroad yalua-
ton, So, 543, 53l. The population O.! the pro-
posed county, including Indians, as shown
by the official census, IS 1878"
With this statement is a lengthy argument
in favor of the creation of Riverside County
with the proposed San JacintO County as
part Of its territory.
THE VAGRANT BILL.
UnloOked-for opposition to De Longs
Vagrant Act, which has passed the Senate
and has been recOnsidered and is pending
final action in the Assembly, is evinced by
the labor organizations Of the State, TO
whom it is thlnlY yelled attempt to en-
power corporations to crush strikes and
boycotts by causing the arrest as Migrants
of strikers or boycotters who have been idle
ten days.
A motion to reconsider the vote whereby
the WOmaD's Suffrage Bill was passed was
made and defeated in the Senate to-day.
Senator Carpenter made an eloquent speec h
in opposition TO the motion, aud McGOwan,
who champiOnei the bill, was given a
beautiful basket of rose 5.