The herald-advance. (Milbank, S.D.) 1890-1922, 1891-03-06

, and instructed by the court as 10 the
character of it's duties:
NJ. II Niselnan \ j Bleser
George Stevenson II Hollands
Nels Bergren Gustavc Janowsky
{ llenr. Port. &. J. Cprrirk
. - I heli Geo Crookcr.
Henry Deits. ii r. Abbott
j. w Johnson G { Am,drn
+. G. smiley Frank Nun1nsrn
Joseph Giroarcr S b Surerlec
A, Is. Story. { G Morton
The calendar was ther examined. and
after number of cases ha1 been contin-
nrd or dismissed. motions were argued
the principal one OF which was N the case
OF n. {. Foster vs.. Chas. Betcher Lum-
Der Company, upon which the court re
served Judgment
On Wednesday the Jury cases We're
taken up AS they were reached, and SO
tar the following cases have been dis
posed Of
Hannah b. Crawford VS. W. W. Leav.
cit, }. X. Taylor. Geo. ". IIaweS, T. f.
Gibson. w S. GLASS and Seward (
tddy for complainant Bion \ Dodge
Tor K. f. Gibson, defendant Dismissed,
Charles Betchcr vs. Grant County
Bell x Bouek for complainant John H.
owen for defendant. Continued
Carl Lorratf IS Chicago VI. & ST. Paul
Ry GO. L. NJ. Besnc:t for respondent.
John ". Bell for appellant Continued.
L. ]. LindquiSt VS. D b. Nichols. John
/ u. owen FOR appellant, Bell i Bouck Tor
respondent. Settled.
John Fey VS. J. A Dil1man. Thomas
l.. Rouck for complainant John ".
Bel Tor defendant. Continued
William Cleveland IS c. NJ. & ST. Pau
| 1
ant, John W Bell for defendant. Con
tinued.
Ward Hubbard VS. Daniel w Cameron
and Bridget Cameron, NJ J. Gordon. Il.
+. Warner, +, f. Budd - c. & ". r.,
Thomas tor complainant, Gordon 4 Skill
man q X. L. Warner Tor defendant Con-
tlnued.
Adelbert I. Shields vs. Mpls. & St. L.
Ry. Go. J.. NJ Bennett for complainant.
Me!lette and Mellette for defendant.
Continued.
Wm. W. Wilson vs. Mpls. & ST. l.. Rv.
Go. +. NJ. Bennett for complainant,
Mellette and Mellette for defendant.
Continued.
Elmlre +. l1errek vs. Mpls d St L. |
Rv. 60. l.. NJ. Bennett for complanant.
Mellette and Melette for defendant. !
Continued
Henry Essincton vs. Mpls & ST. l.. Ry. /
Go. Z. NJ Bennett for complainant, /
Mellette and Mcllette for defendant.
:.
la9rai iiansoh IS hpls, & 81 J.. Ky. /
.. =. W. Bennett Tor complainant
.Nei1tle anu Nelletle lor defendant.
1oailiuea.
Walter Mann VS. !. W. Bashy Bion
Dodge and L. J.. Cliff for complainant
Bell Il Bou"k for defendant Dismissed.
Advance Ihreshlhg 60. vs. John Mod
ieN lhos. NJ. 'ran1 and \. " Moslus
ior com plalilant, blon a. Dodge lor de-
ueh'aht. verdict IN favor OF plaintiff.
v &. Nichols 4 Son VS. j. T. Steven
SON. Bon 4. Dodge for complainant,
Thos. Il. Bouck for defendant. Verdict
IN favor Of defendant.
w. y.,.: p.
n''i 1.'i''le" D'fhei' 81 y a,erto"n
So ~ ooJe' ,nn ,e ,oes - Win 'he luii
,ulae ,n, ~. ~ oNe' ooo los u aNolfaupols 70
o'eN i'''n
4 large attendance of interested spec.
tators is had every day Of court 80
far, the room beng crowded t. lis utmost.
and as the sanitarvlroyisions of the bnld'
~ are ilo' ~ me mos' approved char.
80 e : .o'l.'l.uous session ~ lour Or I've
iouis 70 not ao an lii'lsofaslh2.
Quite a sensation was raised Yesterday
when the attorney for The ,leiendent in
he case Of Advance Thresher a.. =
John Medley made the aunonuca.
nent that the Jury had been hammered I
With and an attempt IT bribery made by s