The Wheeling daily intelligencer. [volume] (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1865-1903, 1891-06-06

the time next term.
( The examination Of Robinson was
icontinucd.
YOU have been bitterly preiudiced
against the defendant since the time
you went into the jurybox ~
A.-No, sir. ssl
Q.-And is it not also true that your
family have been bitterly preiudiced
against him? Have not your wife and
YOUR father held a bitter prejudice
against this defendant2
Any father may have heh q prelu-
dice against DIR. Garrison, but If my wife
has any feeling in tho matter it would
be for Garrison.
Here there was an objection and Mr..
Howard suggested that his grandfather
be inquired about. -
Q.-Where did you meet Mr.. Talbot
A.-on Market reetbetween Samples
liquor store and H6ges' store.
Q.-You stoke in that conversation
about opinions and newspapers?
A.-Yes, sir; there was some talk
about 1t.
Q.-What paper was named?
A.-No paper was named.
Q.-Then there was conversation
about opinions formed from newspa.
pers?
Q.-Then the only difference between
you and Talbert is that you said you
didn't see how man could form an
opinion from the newspapers, because
it was all one-sided, and he said that
you said you didn't see how a man
could read the papers and not form an
opinion?
Al believe that's what he said.
Q.-You saw in the report of the cor
oner's inquest the evidence Of John
Miller that DR.. Garrison had followed
DR.. Baird up Eleventh street with the
pistol in-his hand?
Al don't know Miller.
Q.-You read the evidence OF the cor
oner's inquest2
Al believe I did.
Q.-You saw in that the testimony
that Or. GarFisoh mad f6tf0wtd DT.
Baird with a pistol and it was on that
you made that remark to Mr.. Talbert?
A.-No, sir.
Dovencr-Did you know DIR. Garri-
son?
A.-No, sir; 1 never knew him till he
was brought in here and pointed out
to me.
Odd you know DR.. Baird?
A.-No, sir; l never knew him.
Arnett.-Didn't DR.. Garrison teach
school near your place?
Ayes; 1 think he taught the whole
winter term, about mile and hall
from my place, but Inever saw him.
Q.-Your children went to school to
him, did they not2
A.-No; I'm not in that district. My
cousins children went to him.
JUROR scuAuDr's STATEMENT.
Henry Bruhn was then called. he
had told OF his conversation with Juror
Schmidt to his wife and brother-in-law,
Mr.. Iyens6n, and to his sister and
brother. The conversation between
them, detailed in the deposition, took
place in the front part Of Behrens's
store over the show case; they were
talking in Danish; there was no one
Immediately present when the talk took
place.
Witness was askedif he belonged to
any orders that had been making an in
vestigation OF the case, and he said he
did not. Witness could not say whether
Schmidt was in the store when became
back from dinner or whether he came
in afterward. Captain Dovener in
quired at length Of the witness about
things very immaterial to the question,
such us what are their busy days in the
store; where Mr.. Behrens was that day;
what the other clerks were doing at the
same time, etc.
Witness said defendant said he heard
the shooting and saw DIR. G0rris6nleom-
ing away with the pistol in his hand,
and that he saw the crowd rushing to
the spot and he came away because he
did not want to have anything to do
with it. Schmidt said: "Do you know
what l think they ought to do with
him?" Witness asked what, and
Schmidt said, "They ought toostring
him up without going any further g.G
Captain Dovener, looking over the
dispositions, got his eye on some other
testimony, and began to contradict
Bruhn's statement with it. His atten-
ton was called to his error, and he
changed the line of examination, but
nothing further was brought out
SCHMIDT ON THE STAND.
Juror Schmidt was examined. He
had heard&r Bruhn's statement; on the
morning OF the shooting he had gone
up to the upper market to buy hay; as
he came down from the corner Of Elev-
enth street, he heard the shots and
thought he had better not go any fur
Their, because he did not know what