The Iola register. [volume] (Iola, Allen County, Kansas) 1875-1902, 1891-03-27
District Court Proceedings.

hfsS. IH"lN W. VI 1hn'
District Court Proceedings.
Since our last report cases have been
disposed of as follows:
State VS. Hedeen, court finds defend.
ant guilty as charged. (This was the
case brought against Hedeen as the
representative of the s. X. X. X.
charging him with obstructing the
public highway south of lola. The
Judgment of the court has not yet
been given.)
State VS. VIM Skeeters, dismissed
at deft's cost.
In the case of Simpson West, found
guilty of stealing three horses, the
defendant was sentenced to Is years
in the penitentiary.
Western Farm Mortgage Co., vs
Jane Rutledge ct. al, judgment for
plf for S53I.24 and foreclosure of
mortgage awarded.
City vs. n. f. Acers. judgment for
deft. This action was brought by
the city to extend the city limits so as
to include Mr.. Acers property
II. +. Culbertson VS. Board Co. Com
r's, judgment for defendants.
VIM Mcconnell vs. VIM Davis, dis
missed at plff7s cost.
Barrackman vs Hauser, (the steer
easel verdict in favor of delft, that he
retain the property i'm controversy
and recover of l.l'ff his costs. (The
costs will amount to about $780,
The Long-Bell Lumber Co. vs. S. l..
Lester, judgment for plff for S275.s2
and foreclosure of mechanics lieu
awarded.
Patterson vs Jury, settled, costs
paid.
H.. J. Butler, vs. Chas. Hoddy, ct.
al, dismissed at pl'ff7s cost.
Phoenix Life Ins. Co. VS. John Pier
son ct. al, judgment for pl'ff for Sl256.
81 and foreclosure of mortgage award
ed.
Phoenix Life Ins. Co., vs. +. Rich
ardson ct. al, Judgment for pl'f for
Sl2S5.24 and foreclosure of mortgage
awarded.
Chas. and VIM King vs. o. Hotten-
stein, settled.
Melville Carlton VS. State, dismiss
ed Mt pl'ffs cost and remanded to
Justice of the Peace.
Alice B. Bullions ct. al, vs. Jas.
Mccain, Judgment for pl'ff for SLIGO.
% and foreclosure of mortgage award
ed.
Allie NJ. Hackett vs. Mary f. Cen
try ct. al. Judgment for pl'f for $3.50
and foreclosure of mortgage awarded.
n. c. Arnold vs. H. Groesbeck,
Judgment for pl'ff for S602.S4 and fore
closure of mortgage awarded.
Hubbard & Taylor, vs w. H. Best
and J. ID. Moore, judgment for pPf
against J. ID. Moore for Sl31.30, and
against Best for the same amount.
l.. l.. Northrup, vs. w. H. Best, G.
I. Best ank J.. \. Best, Judgment for
pl'ff, vs. G. 1. Best for S374.41, and
finding against w. H. Best S364.4l, l..
a. Best, 500. 46, and property attach
ed ordered sold.
l.. l.. Northrup vs. Sarah +. Jones
ct. al, Judgment for pl'tf, for S234.SO,
and foreclosure awarded.
:. NJ. Knox vs A. Keifer ct. al, ac-
ton dismissed as per stipulation.
H. Litzback VS. J. $. Hinkle, judg-
ment for pl'tf, for $3.50.
l.. l.. Northrup vs. +. J. Best for
$3.50.
5. e. Warner vs w. +. Young ct. al,
settled.
State vs. +. +. Curt, motion for new
trial over-ruled and Judgment that de-
PENDANT pay fine of $500 and costs.
Lucretia Boeken vs. B. Boeken, ct
al, Judgment for defendants that they |
go hence without day.
Paul Fisher vs. S. A. Woodward ct |
al, Judgment for Geo. a. Bowlus for |
SS7.34, Judgment for plf that he be
awarded foreclosure of lot 8, block b, |
Moran, subject to Bowlus lien.
f. Mills w S. Remley, judgment for
defendant that he recover of plf. SIS.
and costs.
Paul Fisher vs A. o. Leary motion
to re-taX costs over-ruled.
n. T. Greenwood VS. Matthew White
Judgment for plff vs. White for $63,
and foreclosure of mortgage. Judg-
ment for Talcott VS. White for S3l.OO.
Judgment for Ault vs. White for S449.-
IS, and foreclosure of mortgage.
George L. CLEARWATER, divorce
granted plff.
f. /. McHenry vs. Cora May McHen-
~, divorce granted plff.
Matte Seip vs Fred Seip, divorce
granted plff.
y. G. Arnold vs. H. GrOesbeck ct al,
Judgment for plff for S602.S4 and fore
closure of mortgage.
Lizzie Baker vs Charles Baker, pltf
granted divorce.
Elizabeth Wood VS. Harranl Wood,
diff granted divorce.
Geo. Herdman vs. Edward Nc
first trial in ejectment and
Usual procedure in such cases.
Stadden Grocery Co. VS. d. w. Grad
lock, motion to re-tax costs sustained.
Jacob Baus, Admir- est. J. Fisher,
Iced, vs. Harry Thompson, judgment
or Tobey for $40.
Men who Advertise and need a new idea
Ow and then, or who have not always the
ime or inclination to prepare their advertise
nents. will fiud q valuable assistant in the |
A1~A1 l-z.1 - r.. "A, nsa- t.n.A II