Daily Kennebec journal. [microfilm reel] (Augusta, Me.) 1870-1975, 1891-11-11
Meteorological Report.
NOV, 10. .Ssl. 2. NJ
SUPERIOR COURT.
November Term, WaterYille, Oliver &.
Hall, Justice Presiding.

W. 5 CHoArE Clerk.
G 7 STsvsss. Sheriff.
LIZZIE p WELcH, Reporter.
Deputy shsrlfis III ssleudance-J. P. Hill,
Wsrervlile; G. W. Jones, Benton.
wArERvILLE, New 10.-Pfayer by Rev.
M. Sparks Of Wslervilie.
The jury is made up Of C. Fl,
DGummond, Winslow, foreman; George
F. Allen, O,kland; Horace R. Austin,
Belgrade; 1. W. Blksr. Litohdeld
Augustus N, Dyer, Sidney; Charles A.
Good .,n, Benton; Francis Hsnley, Pitts
ton; c A. HUI, Watefville; Moses T.
Jones, Fsyette; Herbert Kendall, Clinic
A. Nelson Manter, Wayne, s,d L D. Mer-
chant, Hsllovell; supernumsries. e. +
Pi1ktsm, Augusta; Levi S, Rairden,
Fsrmingdale. -Four jurors were excused,
s. T. Cannon, Augusta; c. E. Cummings,
Anqusts; Jesse Partridge, Gardiner, and
C. Fl. Rediogtor, Waterville.
The forenoon was occupied in calling
docs ct and hea,iog several divorce eases.
| Members of the bar present from Gardiner.
| 0. B. Clsson and +. E Besne; from Au-
qusta, f W. Wniiehouse, L Titrcmb, A.
VI UO1O0tu. ". w. JoIctr ". a L uriis IL
W. IBlAcG; Winthrop, l.. +, Carleton
oakland, Geo. ". Field, II. L. Hunton
Chrtcn, Forest J. Mar,iu; Fsirh Id. Geo.
Chapman; Wstertille, W. 7. Haines. 8.
$ Brown, c. f. Johnson, W. c. Phil
brook, F. A. Wsldror, Frank Plnmmer,
+ " Clair, Il. u. Eaton; Pittsfeld, j.
w. Manson.
Inc following cases we're plsced uron
the trial list; Brann vs.. msrden ct al.
Hsines; Wsld,on. Hussey VS. Reeves.
F. W W; W, j. & W. Gallagher VS..
Proctor Brown; Hsines. Rezlnski VS..
Allen. Phnbrook, White; Heath & Tuell.
Webb We Lvnde. W., j. & W; Goddard.
k,der'cx VS.. Mshen. Wsldron; Clair.
Dow vs Allen. W, J. & W; Hsines.
Hodges. Msnsur & Co W. Lane. Wald-
r,n; Philbrcok. Soule vs.. Martin. Spear,
f W. w Adams Gilman IS. Levine.
Wsldron; Pnilbrocs Wrnee VS.. Crosby.
wsldron; W, J & W Melvin, hbt., vs..
Melgin ", J. & W Wald,on.
At the comir Ia CT the court in the after
nom ,he call for .risl was Everett W.
b-own vs. Frapk A. Msfdsn and Geo.
G,ark w. II Hsines for plsintifi. f. A.
Wadron for oef-ndent Tne parties to The
SUIT reside in VsssAlboro
The plsin,iff says ha had good nice
horse sli SQUAD and bin but ore who would
sIet when worked snd de.ired 20 excnangs
for one taas would work well and that his
wife could drive, 50 be negotiated with
the defepdents who Represented that
they hsd I,s tuch hAss, ell sound,
kind and sl right, good worker but no great
raa'er trade zss mfse and the
plain,iff Gays he On discovered that ne had
Q kicker; he tred 10 plo~ sud the horse
kicked and reared go he cou'd do nothing.
he pus the horse il the stable and she kicst d
the stall sll down. He vent to . store a.
/ North Vasssioofo, and hilched his horse 10
q post, and while in the store the horse
kicked the wagon to pieces, and broke up
hiags generally. He the made an effort 10
have the defendants trade back, but without
eucce 81. He then offered to return the hC rse
and tried to repievin his, bat tie defend
ants had put that one away, and 50 he
brings ihis action Of truver 10 recover i.s
value. Tbs plaintiff aai,hed his evidence
and the defendants case was opened. They
claim that the plaintiff was very anxious to
| trade with them, having heard Of the horse
which they owned, and thought il WAS just
what he wanted. That they had owned the
horse bu. short time, and that she was
kind and gentle, and that no representation
OF soundness were made at the time Of the
tiAde, aad say that the kicking was due to
causes ether than the disposition Of the
horse.