The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1891-09-10

Arnold Tor defendant. Issue Of
law and fact.
Decree granted. No appearance
Of defendant.
8. John II. Niles, plaintiff, VS..
B. G. Winston & Co. and Sadlev
& Barrett, defendants. j. i.
Brady for plaintiff. j. A. Ross
for defendant Andrew j. Barrett.
and Chas. Keith for defendant John
T. D. Sadley. Issue Of fact.
Judgement for plaintiff by con
sent of defendants.
8. Thos. Kane & Co., plaintiff,
VS.. Thomas H. Galley, defendant,
Chas. Keith for defendant. Issue
of law and fact.
Tried by court. Decision in
favor of plaintiff. No appearance
of defendant.
10: Joseph L. Brady, plaintiff,
VS.. Henry G. Head and Robert j.
McBrady, defendants. j. L.
Brady attorney in person. D. W.
Bruckart for defendants. Issue of
fact. s|
Continued.
II. Robert j. McBrady, plant
if, VS.. Henry G. Head, defendant.
J. L. Brady for plaintiff. D. w.
Bruckart for defendant. Issue of
law and fact. -..~..
Continued. s:...... ....
10. John H. Pitmon, plaintiff,
VS.. The Eastern Railway Company
Of Minnesota, defendant. D. W.
Bruckart for plaintiff. Geo. H.
Reynolds for defendant. Issue of
law and fact.
Settled and dismissed.
13. Thomas M. Pitmon, plant
if, VS.. The Eastern ailway Com
pany Of Minnesota, defendant. D.
w. Bruckart for plaintiff, Geo.
H. Reynolds for defendant. Issue
of law and fact.
Settled and dismissed.
II. Princeton Potato Starch
Co., plaintiff, VS.. William Brown.
defendant. Chas. Keith for plant
if. j. A. Ross for defendant.
Issue of law and fact.
Dismissed by plaintiff without
costs.
Is. John L. Henry, plaintiff,
VS.. j. A. Brown, defendant. P. B.
Command for plaintiff. D. w.
Bruckart for defendant. Issue of
law and fact.
Judgement for defendant. No
appearance of plaintiff.
Is. Coleman Bridgman, plant
if, VS.. N. G. Dunning, defendant.
D. w. Bruckart for plaintiff. J.
A. Ross for defendant. Issue of
law and fact. a..i
Continued.
II. Princeton Potato Starch
Co., plaintiff, VS.. Cornelius HI.
Chute, defendant. Chas. Keith
for plaintiff. j. "A. Ross for de-.
PENDANT. Issue of law and fact.
Settled and dismissed without
costs.
IS. Benjamin Soule, plaintiff,
VS.. The Eastern Railway Company
of Minnesota, defendant. w. Ham
mons and j. A. Payne for plant
if. M. d. Grover for defendant.
Issue Of law and fact.
Continued. .....
49,: Phoebe Soule, plaintiff, VS..
The Eastern Railway Company of
Minnesota, defendant. w. Ham
mons and j. A. Payne for plaintiff.
M. d. Grover for defendant. Issue
of law and fact.
Continued. :s#.. -. "
20. Samuel M. Cook, plaintiff,
VS.. The Great Northern Railroad
Company, defendant. D. w.
Bruckart for plaintiff. M. D.
Grover for defendant. Issue of
law and fact.
Continued. ..@
81. Reuben F. Mcclellan, plant
if, VS.. The St. Croix Lumber
Company, defendant. Chas.
Keith for plaintiff. Clapp & Ma
cartney for defendant. Issue of
law and fact. .4
Continued.
%. Thomas M. Libby, plant
if, VS.. j. w. Mcclellan, defend
ant Geo. III. Reynolds for paint
if. Chas. Keith for defendant.
Issue of fact.
Tried by jury. Verdict for
plaintiff.
%. The Rum River Improve.
ment Company, plaintiff, VS.. The
st. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba
Railway Co., defendant. Chas.
Keith for plaintiff. M. D. Grover
for defendant. Issue of law.
Motion to strike out answer
Motion denied.
"a