The enterprise. [volume] (Wellington, Ohio) 188?-1899, 1891-10-14
Circuit Court.

Judges Caldwell and Baldwin, Of Cleve-
land, and Upson, Of Akron, on the bench.
Catherine Ray VS. Lake Shore railroad,
was dismissed by plaintiff. This was an
action to enjoln the company from raising
Its track in Elyria, next to the Metropoli-
tan hotel, till damages were paid. The
case had gone against the plaintiff in COM
mon pleas.
The Cleyeland stone company vs. Lake
Shore railroad was dismissed. This was
an action for an Injunction restraining the
defendant from hauling stone Of other
quarries over spur stone road in Amherst
across lands of plaintiff, claiming that de-
fendant had no right to haul anything on
1t saye the stone Of plaintiff. Plaintiff
without hearing dismissed the case.
Harriet P. Moses VS. Mariah Butterfeld.
This was an action by the vile Of VIM.
Moses, of Belden, to quit title in her TO
the Castle house and lot in Oberlin, on the
south side Of East College street She
won the case against the various heirs who
claimed ii In suit In common pleas.
Henry E. Cooley vs. George IL. Brown.
Judgment Of common pleas affirmed
This was an Amherst case.
The commissioners of Lorain county VS.
the Lake Shore railroad. This was an ac-
tion against the road for damages in de-
stroying the old road at Brownhelm sta
tion, by raising the track, and IN its place
constructing a new road in new place,
The .circuit court held as the common
pleas did, that the railroad had a right to
do as II did, so long as 1t gave the public
as good road as 1t had before. y
Lorinda Sutter VS. Jabez Bainbridge
This is Ridgeville case, brought by the
plaintiff to get title to farm there. Ger
tain heirs claimed she had only life es-
tate in the land, while she claimed she
had the fee simple. The cour. held that
she had only life estate.
Hiram L. Faxon, administrator VS. the
Lake Shore road. The lower court re.
versed and sent back for new trial. In
this case the court below took the case
from the jury whep the plaintiff rested
The circuit court held this was wrong
The action was for damages on account ol
the death Of young Faxou, who was killed
last spring while working for the compa.
ny.
James A. Sheridan VS. Oberlin village
The finding OF the mayor was sustained
He had been found guilty Of gambling by
the mayor, gff
John Hardy vs the village Of 0berlin
The court sent the case back TO the mayor
for a new trial This was gambling case
also.
Charles Wanger We the village Of 0ber.
lin. Mayor sustained. This was also q
gambling case.
A. j. Tillotson, administrator Of Clinton
Hutchinson, vs. Bonsor Jacobs. This wat
an action brought TO recover for the widow
and children Of Hutchinson damages for
the wrongful killing Of the husband and
father. The court below held that Jacobs
Is not now resident of this county, Sc
that a summons left at his residence would
be good service, as he Is confined In the
penitentiary. The circuit held that his
residence is here, and reversed the lower
court.
s. X. Laundon VS. the w. d L. Z. rail.
road. Mr.. Laundon lives in Wellington
and brought suit TO recover about 1905
for land the defendant appropriated and
ueyer paid for Both courts have found
In his favor.
August Straus VS. the village Of 0berlln
The lower court affirmed. Mr.. Straus wal
defeated In both courts. He brought &C
tlon to make the village pay certain money
on garnishee process.
Mary Z. Hill VS. Albert Hill. Alber
Illll lives in Camden, and the plaintiff, bii
divorced wife in Wellington. She brough
SUIT to recover 800 for support and cloth
ing for his daughter whom she has main
tanned since the divorce suit. Both court
held in his favor. He claimed that sh,
agreed, at the separation, TO maintain th'
girl, and he the boy, and she claimed sh,
did mot