The united opinion. [volume] (Bradford, Vt.) 1881-1970, 1891-12-25

SALMON Is. HEBARD, Clerk.
JOHN A.: BuswELL, Sheriff.
u. Is. PICKETT, JR.. States Atty.
JOHN IL. MIMMs, Reporter.
Court rose Thursday night, Dec. II,
at about $50 O'Clock, although the
Judge directed the sheriff to come In
the next morning and adjourn court.
AS was intimated in our report last
week there was no case tried by jury
and there were but very few cases tried
by the court in which there were wit
nesses. This is the shortest term of
court within the memory of most of
the members of the bar. Below we
give Che disposition of the cases not on
the jury calendar, which were report
ed last week. The cases not mention
cd either In this or last weeks report
are coptinued without other action.
6 Alvah Bean v. Ely-Goddard Il
Cain. uAssumpsit. Gleason for plain
tiff, Farnham, Watson and Hebard for
defendant.
z. s. M. Ladd v. Ely.Goddard &
Cazin.. Same cause of action and same
counsel as No. 6.
9. Jordan Marsh & Co. v. Ely. God
dard & Cain and trustees. Assump-
sit. Leslie and Darling for plaintiff,
Farnham and Hebard for defendant.
10. Connecticut & Passumpsic Riv.
err Railroad Go. v. Ely.Goddard &
Cazln aud trustees. Assumpsit.
Farnham for plaintiff, Hebard for de-
fendaht, Watson for trustee.
13.i Abraham Long v. Ely-Goddard
& Ca1in. Assumpsit. Farnham for
plaintiff, Hebard for Cain.
IS. Sears s. Co. v. Ely-Goddard &
Cain and trustees. Assumpsit. Farm
ham for plaintiff, Hebard for defend
ant. osi'
49, Miner, Beal & Hackett v. Ely
Goddard & Cain and trustees. AS
sumpsit. Farnham for plaintiff, He
bard for defendant.
20,s r. Farnham, administrator of
Smith Ely's estate v. Ely-Goddard Il
Cain. Assumpsit. Farnham for
plaintiff. Hebard for Cain.
The foregoing eight cases were en-
tered settled. This is the beginning
of the settlement of all of the lawsuits
connected with the business of the
Vermont Copper Mining Co., Vermont
Copper Co and Ely Goddard & Caz-
in. AS soon as Hon. E. L. Waterman,
the special master in the chancery suit
of Cain v. Smith Ely and others re-
turns from his business trip West, the
whole matter is expected to be closed.
%. E. r. Hyde v. w. G. Clark, apt.
Action Of trespass. Referred to r.
Farnham Dec. term 1886. At the
June term 1890 it was ordered that a
report be filed by the next term or nom
suit be entered. The referee was not
called out by either party and a nom
suit was entered this term for want of
report. Hebard for plaintiff, Boyden
for defendant.
20. Sears & Co. v. Ely-Goddard &
Cain, apt. This was an appeal from
the court of insolvency, where 1884
the defendants were adjudged insol-
vent. As part of this settlement Of
the mining affairs it was agreed that
the adjudication below be reversed
and set aside and this Judgment be GER
titled tQ the court OF insolvency. Farm
ham for petitioners, Hebard and Wat
son for petitioners.
%. Ransom, Forbes & Co. v. G. A.
Blodgett. Assumpsit. Hon. S. B.
Hebard appointed referee in 1885. 1t
is ordered this term that report be
fled next term or non-suit. A. X.
Brown for plaintiff, j. D. Denison and
Boyden for plaintiff.
46. George j. Prince and others v.
town of Braintree. Road petition.
At the June term 1889, j. X. Darling,
F. l.. Parsons and M. j. Denison were
commissioners. At this term
the case stood for hearing Oh the re-
port which had been filed. On mo-
ton of the defendant the report is re-
to the commissioners for |
and addition. The case
stands with the court for nearing af-
ter the report is amended. j. d. Den
ison for plaintiff, Boyden for defend
ant. yas
40. Birchmore v. Birchmore. Mis-
entry.
so. Emma j. Avery v. Warren
Avery. Petition for divorce. Dis
missed without hearing. Harvey for
pet 'tioner.
81. Charles Parker v. j. S. War
den and trustee. Assumpsit. Heard
by the court on demurrer by the de.
PENDANT to the declaration. The de-
murrer is sustained by the court and
the declaration Of the plaintiff is adj
Judged insufficient. The plaintiff has
leave to file new count on the usual
terms.. Pickett for plaintiff, Pingree
for defendant, Watson for trustee.
SO. r. G.. Jameson v. E. H. Will
ams and Natl Bank of Newbury trus-
zee. Assumpsit. Discontinued. Les
lie for plaintiff and trustee.
So and SO. Bradford Savings Bank
md Trust Co. v. Pioneer Town Site
20. and others. Action of debt. Both
Eases discontinued. Watson and Farm
lam for plaintiff.
81. John H. Watson v. David G.
White. Action for debt. Judgment
or plaintiff. The clerk to assess dam
gees on notice to the defendant. Wat
on pro sc Harvey.
81. E. X. Burnham apt. v. estate of
Annie Burnham. Appeal from judg-
nent of the probate court. Referred !
0 E. w. Smith and to be tried accord
ng to the rules of law.
"a. Orrin Copeland v. VIM. Man.
hester. apt. Assumpsit: Settled. :