Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1891-09-01

Henry COIN; entirely too high.
The property OF l.issdore Williams
WINS assessed more than three hundred
per cent higher than last year.
n. liodgman; excessive valuation.
III. NJ. Mccartney, excessive valua.
ton aud mistake In boundaries.
John Clark said that lie was firmly
Of the opinion that little cqualiking
was necessary In REGARD TO the valua.
ton placed on hls property by Clute
and asked n reduction.
J. II. Picknell estate wa. a~sessed far
In excess Of what II was worth.
u. Shurtlifi was assessed 70 high that
the rating would puzzle "baloonist."
Ripple * Go. were assessed for 81, 200
worth OF property, while they owned
but $1,000 worth.
John q. Davis; excessive valuation.
Jane 3. Cowan complained that her
assessment was $500 higher than last
year and $1,000 Ia advance OF county
assessment.
Anna Schvinn; excessive assesses
ment.
a. y. l.. Thorup; same complaint.
Miss Sophia Cleveland; more than
double the county assessment.
Thomas Cracrot said that he had
been unable 70 work for three years
and asked reduction.
Mrs. Y. II. Woodmansee objected 10
paying excessive taxes on her property.
Hlon's Benefit & Building Society
claimed that Clutc's assessment ON Its
property was illegal because no onseit
or credit had been allowed for liabill.
ties. The assessment was also far Ia
excess Of the county valuation.
George 4. Odell said the county val
uation Of his wife's property was $1,000.
Clutc, however, had assessed the same
property at s9200. lie asked reduc.
ton 10 county assessment.
H.. +. Chamberlain complained OF
excessive valuation.
Emma Chamberlain said that Clute
had assessed her property S27jO more
than county valuation.
William IL. j. Stevenson complained
Of his property being RsHessed $500 In
advance OF what u was worth.
Mrs. Samuel l.. Spfaguc, q pool
widow, asked q reduction.
:. l.. 5prasuc also complained Of OK.
ccssive valuation.
Mrs. \. q. Hansen complained Of hel
property being assessed for more thar
| II was worth.
George openshSw, Jr.; similar com
plant.
j. :. Groesbcck would cell for several
thousand dollars less than assessment.
Hiram Grocsbeck represented that hii
/ property was assessed at least $1,000
more than II wa. worth.
James Stirling; excessive Assessment
aud error In boundaries.
Eliza j. Fox complained that he
property was assessed nearly $40 pc
cent. too high.
Sarah J. Williams, an aged widow
asked for remittance.
III. L.. A. Culmer filed several pro
tests on account Of excessive valuation
Susan Mclaughlin; excessive valua
ton.
James Mclaughlin; ditto.
The cooperative Wagon and Ma
chine Company rendered. the following
statement Of H. business: Bills teceiv
able, s3s, SOTO, accounts receivable
S21,0ii.ss; merchandise on hand
81, i150s; total assets, sl37,6sT.ld
From which shUnld be deducted debt
and liabilities, s1O,6s3,50. II asked {
be- taxed on net values ofS3I ,09s.0B.
James Mclaughlin, Susan Nc
Laughlin, Christian johnson, II. A
NJ. Froiseth, Jennie froiseth, q. J
6ustaveeon, James McLaughlin, 7
Hull, Mary T. Barnes, John TIA DAM
ID. &. Richardson, Thomas BlshoI
William Weir, Fifteenth Ward TX
clesiasticsl association, l.. u. Hard
ct al, Susan Il. Smith ct AL, Wonder
land, Anna J. Eardley, Salt LAX
Foundry and Machine Company
Jabez W. Taylor, II. Leyland, r. Il
Msrgetts estate, r. II. Hyde, mad
complaints Of excessive valuation.
The following asked remlssions 70
feaaons Indicated.