Omaha daily bee., 1891-02-25
WIFE RE0y Ed NEIL NAY HANG,
Brief ofthe Attorney General in the Appeal
ofthe Waiting Convict
HOPE OF HIS ATTORNEYS OSPELlsD,
I'm Array OF Decisions Against the
Points Raised -DistHCt Court
Don ss SuprC me- Court Notes
Odds and Ends


~.
lincoln. NED, req. -. .Nne0' 10 l''
BEE. Tho attorney general has hlrd ms
brief in the case OfEd ~ Neil thcSuuM
omo,,, ,,rlrr,r 1'hc torl,n,m aholuds
.,I.,;,i,, ,.,,.,,,i,,i,,, ho
"N"'Nu'''' 'i""' ''' '"Oi '''' ''"H ",
Natdityof The proceedings III hSIoW'rt"uri
upon which Ncil'sattomCys based tier al.
lcmt ions OF error Iuthctrbricrn bchal Of
,h, c,,.l.,,, 4, .,,,,..... ,,,r,,,.. anil ryt..fr
,"' ~ WV .'.' \ wv. -, ''
'V', ,''"'" '"', " "'''V '' "'''
Iu''Itd ny Iho lower court Wh'h ~ P'r"'' you
the jury to visit the l'hnCy farm and Wow
the premises without taking the prisoner
with thp,, Th,vd,uicI ryr,. hnvtrg n, ado
=, G,.,,,l o,,,, Ht N.,,,,s ,.t ,,o,.,.nr,,,,ny
" W. '""' W "'' VI .N'"' 't". W"' '"'l'''l
the jury thilhrr, md cmtcndcd that he could
mo-, waive the ri ght If he SoWi~hrl. The at
tornCygcucml' briCrmotcs thodcCisous of
,rou,' s,,, a., r,,,.tst, slo,,. that NrI had thc
,lh,. ,,.,.,.'.,.,, ,,. i,i,, In
rEut W"',0ul ''.I '"O Ju'S - Nv u" VI"
maltod, Judge MaNWell mas aIca'iy hHu
that the viowiugOf the premises should be
done, mthcprc essence of the prison cr less
,,l.,,li,,,, u,,, ,,ri,.;l,,, N,,,h,r ln,i.ion
Il. ''0'','' " ''' P'' 'N'''
OF the Oregon supreme court mas hel 'oa.
having failed to apply for the privilege oil
acco ornpan wing the Jury, tho prisoner must
hca,,n,i ,n bovc w,i,,cl nnv rri,i ccn
,,i~,.I ,.I ,,,, srL., ,,i,e .,n
"hi'u he tlau IN 'HlS rvSP'c| luz p'"i CO.."
tends that NcilS visit to the Sccnc OF the
umc could have avalcd hlm nothing, ms
he would simply have bccna mute observer
and could neither aS X nor answer any quGS-
TONS, nor in any way interfere with aclS,
observations or conclusions OF tho Jury,
Nell made no application to accom- pany the
jury and the records SHOW that his attOr
neyS expressly waived his right TO do So
EvCry feature the prisoners briefs fully
met.
DISTINCT COURT NOTES
The Jury in the G. Oolul CLAY case, involy-
Ing "A nice pOlut of Law as to The individual
lhbllIly OF SloCkhoIderS When lhc company
IallS 10 publish aiu'ltS Ol iHcoF pVFhtiVH'
W'rS uhaWo 10 aEioe anu Iho court us
chatsed them. Inc Jury was Out lorIy-IlBhu
holrS'
JAHeS lNIc, lhe Jury man VINO lalSu to
appGaE ,E ior GUY %n9H ii Sum,o',eai was was
orouEhI before Judge l. ieIa ON altacn inehI
l0r contempt aud compelled to pay - hnelo
'., roN ci T,'?,S o. ECt'nE niHl 'G9o"o, no
pr uL' hcT1 IA n9 i'''ll 10 'A'i oN u,o'
,!t tt ,u' V,o @ ol Us, "n l,,,,
p pIi .i, u,iS u'S rmo JU,S &
@ ruo u a.,iIu.' VI us''"N - '''C''
@''. pu N1'0 i"'"i ~''"'Si9 "ION 'ii0''oH 'oi
Ii, y, '''i it, ma, ID, i,,, ,,, ,,o.,.,, .,io,.
l. ,"sG = ~ ~, ",u a ,ui ",o 'E TE - oD0"S
~, AZ t:hi - NJ NJ ,ns' H., %
JA I onIl -. ion MlS N"t iul 'ihl,Is 'u',o
n'lt on = " - ''"h 90 W. V'i
SoLllo @ ' oI7cs' calC'' eori anu IaihluB lilIPe-
| % ilc lS oWutu NY hcr III sitlSlac Sog o
,,j'n, W.. 'I'nuu n alnoi
| HSEd diuSc lS. nct nus Oau'i; 1TIlh diucF I;
for SSb.do She Immediately Ieplevncd and
| NC ne 'aSS hVW Is 10 uc'tr rIihne 'uo ownership.
IL nun c'"i' w 80 uI'Iur d tluHSloI ioiIi
ucA nus Ddhu udVeu feOt ua'H d. lI'' anu
@ tr,,r", o,i jo :, td ia" ~, ,I,o
| ton of Their judgement. The transfer. was
| not filed for record until the same dav the
ud gmeut was obtained. This transfer they
| claim wasnOt made IN good Iaith and no
apparen I change o. own crship toll owed.
| cn,c,u., r,,,
,,r-."s - s..,..
,o i W tc = LoyrIS SIotcol iNlNusc 'Dcn.ll " AT
iof 3ou tI itltln M > IItet was cIoScu laSC even
ilE M tfcull ors' No talcileIt OF assets OF
iatLitiCSS EeIoptalna oIe aill Vhe cause r on
g '"l' - , 20 a I ~ l.C,, -,
dnv in favor or Tyschen & Rcusch for
| S2O33l.
IN TIE SUPREME COURT.
rThc srnre.rrr ,ort mot mrs,,art +ood
o,i,mpant Thc foIlovyine, gcnt lennon ,y"r,
a. ,nttsj to n,.,otirn. PaHJnl,lh M,Vit+
W. ~ cg,, NnLin ~ Go,,
nCffiior Dn"rrInS c,unty
-I'ho r,,,lo,y,,nr cansns ,vor, ,onti mad WI
l,insvs WUixins Amman vs.. RnS.trmnstar
-Tbn foIIo,vi inr ,.aNses were. ar5,,.JHnC1 S,h
n,ittoj Sa,,.i .h ,,nC, ,.t,ri ;, q, cn,,,n,n :,
~, T,a,.,, NIb",. s Nm Z, r'n, - i,,, ,.o
@ @,i ,,rs w. IJ'i, W ncg.iyo,' Ctat. H.,
stnrys S,ota 'NiIho,s We HiiIe,. tn,,os ~,
| < bow,,,n S;now, We \-andnrvna,, O,,-an -
Stn,o S:tovo,. Ts rro,,,l,ins nrn,,,r, We, to,I
Az
IIoll ,,sC,-over r.eavo e,ivop ,,,,i,t tis : r
fIa hrief instaHtcr
| Cn,.t oIiomrnaj to Nvodnasd,y, Fobrno,,
% ISo1 ot q O,rIocka m
| o' ' " ~
N'SM LATED
Mrs. Katie Hansen wants divorce ron
her nuSmn q, Hans. she declares that tel
days ago he was guilty OF extreme cruelt
| toward her That he has been habi tuall |,
harsh and cruel towards her; that he ha
many times threatened to do her great bOdil,
harm. That he has failed to PROV de for her
| ShedechreS mat he II unht to OhaVe the care
aud custody OF their child.
George NJ. Shut asks the court for
divorce from his wife Ella
ODDS A$DENIS
Woslirgton,s hr,n ,lov ,,,.,s coloh,.s,toa q
the park school yretrrdav in "a v,ary - =
r,,.onri,,tn manner several nr tnn scbonf
| romhirod in Uterorv n,j ,n"sir,i mo-
,r,,"nII1o thatwas of r1nrs thon usual oyrc
lcnrn
| lam, NJ Sullivan thouph+ ha WAS c,uo
,,ron 70 rha.tisn NVoIIarnAn n,nlo ovo,,r"s,,
ON Nj AngeIo IyIng nrarUovc,o[.lE NJ,
Gcdid 81 Ia Gas n,,GnntII, y, caiI cdTI,,"n T.
"a CON abIn who md Noon da,oiie,{ b,' iIms, =,
I}ro",,r to ,rva :, warrant for ,,syso"it coii -
for Nv ,ho HAYS fnthCr SnIliI,,n IItn"t,,