The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1891-09-30

raI open at 10 A. NJ. for pre-
business. Hawaiian Jurors
'.,1p.u., and foreign jurors whel
(COnCluded0
CIVIL CASES.
r,,, vs, Hawaiian Gazette Co.
IN T5biting-Neumann for plaintiff
rdsiendant.
Frairuff VS.. All Kai Kou; eject
castle for plaintiff; Ashford 6
glm defendant.
s Fan vs.. Min Yong ct al; assump'
meal ,-s from decision of McCully
.fmbers. Creighton for plaintiff
nj: Castle for defendants.
Eee vs.. C. B. Wilson ct al. as
Carter for plaintiff; Thur.
gpar for defendant.
lse vs.. G. rousseau. admins
asunpsit. Hartwell-Smith fol
4, Hatch for defendant.
n Feed Co. VS.. 7. j. King; as
Hatch for plaintiff; Thurston
for defendant.
Sun We VS.. K. Kobayashi; as.
Ashford & Ashford for plaintiff,
Redward vs.. Henry Davis tres
the case. Davidson for plaintiff
ID for defendant.
ar Silva vs.. All In; ejectment.
.LRosa for plaintiff; Castle fol
Ant
Ial Norris VS.. Emily de Herblay
4. Hatch for plaintiff; Neumann
Allsnt.
mae Company VS.. Okla Kiyoshiro
scOntract service. Appeal from
Court of Honolulu. Rosa fol
I; Ashford & Ashford for defend
glant.
hlully vs.. C. B. Wilson, Marshal
Ea. Appeal from Police Court Of
du, Magoon for plaintiff; Neu-
N defendant appellant.
HAVANA VS.. E. q. Hitchco k,
damage. Neumann for plaintiff
M defendant.
d Il. Davies & Co. vs.. Wilder
Ehp Co.; action on the case.
Val for plaintiff; Hatch for de-
lSeinmann VS.. Wilder Steamship
image. Neumann for plaintiff
sH defendant.
u & Cooke VS.. T. Ahung; as
I" Castle for plaintiffs; Ashford
.Hdf for defendant.
aHEer & Co. VS.. Union Iron Works
Slnpsit. Hartwell for plaintiffs.
y VamarinoS vs.. John Kidwell
Neumann for plaintiff.
lice vs.. Wong Leong; assumpsit.
Ashford & Ashford for plaintiff
iur defendant.
L. Smith VS.. J. H. Reist /; as
IT, Hatch for plaintiff.
IS Chaplin VS.. Z. B. Wilson and
AehEten; trespass. Ashford &
d Tor plaintiff.
! 4 Castle VS.. W. L. Wilcox as,
y Castle for plaintiff.
y: AScUhesney & Sons VS.. Wilder
mp 3p Co.; damages. Appeal from
y. Soat Of Honolulu. Hartwell fol
hatch for acknowledged
Nee Vs. Wilder Steamship Co.
H. \ appeal from Police Court o
~ .n5, hartWelI for plaintiff; Hatch
~ alantappellant.
ang& Co. VS.. Wilder STEAMSHIP,
geS' Appeal from Police Cour
s9 5o; Hartwell for plaintiff
~ ~ aeien3dant-appellant.
- vs. Wilder Steamship Co.
H. appeal from Police Court O
l.a g. HartWell for plaintiff; Hatcl
'aaant appellant.
tlCSPS pno
H., IS FROM OTHER CIRCUITS.
b US ys. Kl!eslkukahiko; ejectment
@t plaih'ltf; Rosa-Kauiukou TO
a ! tAaW1namano VS.. W. A. Kiha
w. L. Holokahiki for plain
BANCo.
- AgI L ct al. vs.. Kesveamabi
s@ 4 EXCEPTIONS from April term
a&B%sotP ffear,Ros for plaintiffs
Pa | H, ,or neutrality-suspicious..
O.. anuncan VS.. Wilder Steam
en- images images, Exceptions iron
sdeIsnad e.erson for plaintiff; Ash
III Of ~ r, vs. .OPiopio; controyers,
va Il, va" ni In Palolo. Davidson
sskabapjuranldn llfs,appellants Kau
de T aCS Tor defendant,
d E ppsfOlay vs.. Samuel Norris
J, SSpptIOns from decision 9
SAha; gIa aann ,Thurston & Frea
"'cn Tor defendant-appel
nj sii os ssa vs.. James sutbe,
d Bc SEPARATION, Appeal from
4o vs., T pr delendant-appellant
qQityS H. :. ). Hayselden ct al
ssr q Dr. Dolaa accounting. Apes
"a plaintiSSle j., dismissing bill
VI. ''n'appellant; Hatch &c fc
5is9 sos:9 vs.. Rosina K. NJ,
decree t 9vl Tor Injunction. Al
~ -! Ion apnlaalntltf; Thurston
d so ansnli vs., Rosiua K Ma,
hon dec. 70 set aside partition
: saQ Byo,.O!ee dismiss;no k;l
q 8 : lFrearr. iUf intif:.appellant
20 aapninsesn;t MOke Mokunu