Barbour County index. [volume] (Medicine Lodge, Kan.) 1880-current, 1891-08-19
d. First publication Aug. 5, 1891.
PUBLICATION NOTICE

PUBLICATION NOTICE.
In the District Court of the 18th judicial dis
trict, within and for the county of Barber, in
the state of Kansas.
Dillwyn Parrish and James Brown Potter
plaintiffs.
william Wise Edward Austin, Charles III. Tin
dal, defendants.
THE above named William Wise will take no
L tee that the said Dillwyn Parrish and
James Brown Potter plaintiffs, did heretofore
file their petition and commence suit in said
district court, within and TOR the county of
Barber, in the state of Kansas, against you,
the said defendant, and Edward Austin and
Charles ii. Tindal, co-defendants with you as
above named. and that you, the said defend
| ant, must answer said petition filed as afore-
said. on or before the Eth day of September,
1891, or said petition will be taken as true, and
Judgment rendered in said action against
said defendant, William Wise. for the sum of
four hundred and twenty dollars with inter
est thereon at the rate of l. per cent. per an
mum from the first day of September, 1890, and
FOR costs of suit; and IA further Judgment
against said defendant and all of the defend
ants 10 said action Tor the foreclosure of "A
real estate, tO-wit: The southwest quarter of
the northeast quarter and the northwest quar-
ter OF the southeast quarter and the east half
OF the northwest quarter of section thirteen.
township thirty-two, range fourteen, west. l.
ing and situated IN the county of Barber. =,
the state OF Kansas, and adjudging that ~
plaintiffs have the first lien on said DR. ealu
To the amount for which Judgment VIII emlses
en- as aforesaid, aud ordering said pr , Ee ea ~
be sold without appraisement, AZ ID o th W
ceeds applied to the payment " ~ 'no pto.
due plaintiffs and costs of sui and 9 noun.
each at a aber pr @ the defendants, ana
tate, interest, property apS 90 ~ tloe, es
tion IN or to said premise ;. or any part thereof
ILSI By Aug. scP VIM m 3 h lands Clerk;
COOK q G0ssETT. ATTORNEYS for PIaintiffs
NO. ESQ Fly st publication Aug. 8, 1891.
foh LEGATION NOTICE.
III tue DlSIrlc Court of thu oat1, i,,a;.;.I l..
tho 800 n and for the county of Barber in
Di nne state of Kansas.
Di nls;Yr Parrish and James Brown Potter
Az" 40 W. Lowry, W. X. spicknal and Mrs.
-, Il. Spicknall, his wife, VIM. A. Richie
Edward Austin, Charles ID. Tindal defend.
ants.
| 7lHE above named William Richie and Alonzo
| W.LoWry Will take notice that the said Dill
| wyn Parrish and James Brown Potter plain
tits, did heretofore file their petition and CON-
s nen nee SUIT IN sald district court, within and
Iof the county OF Barber. in the state of Kan
sas against you the said defendants, and w
X. Splcknall Mrs. w. X. Spicknall, Edward
Austin and Charles ii. Tindal co-defendants
with you as above named, ana that YOU the
sHiu defendants, must answer said petition
MED as aforesaid, ON or before the 18th day of
september, 1871, or said petition will be taken
as true, and Judgment rendered i'm said ac-
tlon against said defendants Alonzo w. Lowry
ana '" X: Spicknall, for the sum of five hun
died and twenty-five dollars with interest
thereon at the rate of l2 per cent. per annum
from the first day of August, 1890. and for
costs OF suit; and further Judgment against
sad defendants and all of the defendants TO
SAID action for the foreclosure of a certain
mortgage upon the following described real
esldte, Io-wlt: Southwest quarter of section
flfteen, township thirty-two, range fourteen
west, lying and situated in the county of Bar
Der, IN the state OF Kansas aud adjudging that
said plaintiffs have the first lien on said prem
lSes 10 the amount for which Judgment will be
taken as aforesaid, and ordering said premises
10 be sold without appraisement, and the pro-
ceeds applied to the payment OF the amount
due plaintiffs and costs Of suit and forever
barring and forecIosing the defendants and
each OF them, of and from all right, title inter-
est, property, and equity of redemption in or to
sasd premises or any part thereof:
Isl By AUG. SCHMIDT, Deputy. ia
LOOK GossETr, Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
No. 2Sgi. First publication Aug 5, 1891
PUBLICATION NOTICE.
IN the District Court of the 18th judicial dis
, ,tlce within ahd for the county of barber. I'm
Diiiwyn Parrish and James Brown Potter,
plaintiffs.
Ier1lI Parks Jennie Parks, Parlin aud Oren-
goTn Co, Edward Austin, Charles Ill. Tindai,
Il Il + above named Jennie s. Parks and Par
L In aud OrendorH Company will take notice
tnat the said Diliwyn Parrish aud James brown
POTTER plaintiffs, did heretofore file their peti-
uon ana commence suit in sad district court
WITHIN and Tor the county OF Barber in the
seate OF Kansas, against you, the said defend
.,
Charles ii. Tindal co-defendants with you as
above named, and that you, tie said defend
anus, must answer said petition filed as afor,,-
sald, on or before the 18th day September. 1881.
or said petition will be taken as true and n
JG iSnIent rendered IN said action against said
deIciindBts 1errtll Parks and Jennie s. Parks,
.ot the sum ofeight hundred dollars, with in
tercst thereon ut the rate of Il per cent. per
annuin from the first day or August, 1890, and |
ioi costs oil ssIit; and Il further judg ment |
aSalllst fd defendants and all az the defend |
ants 10 s'tid action for the foreclosure of GER
t.n mortgage upon the following described |
rtHi estate, to.wit: The north half of the |
southeast quarter and the southwest quarter |
oi Inc southeast quarter of section six, town
situated in the couuty of Barber, in the state
al Kansas, and adjudging that said plaintiffs |
have the first lien on said promises to the |
amount for which Judgment VIII be taken a |
aforesaid. and ordering said premises 10 he
Sold without appraiseIneBt. and the proceeds
applied to the payment Of the amount due /
pisiintit1s and COSTS OF suit, aud forever barring
and foreclosing the defendants, and each of /
them, vi and from all right. title, estate inter
est, property and equity of redemption ia or /
70 f sala premises or any part Ihc s.s.
tL.S.1 By AUG. SCHMIDT Deputy ia
COOK GOSSETT, Attorneys for Plaintiff
No. First Published Aug. x, 1881.
PUBLICATION NOTICE.
State Of Kansas. Barber County 81:
la the district court of said county and state /
Joseph j. Chadwick. plaintiff.
versus
Annie q. Chadwick. defendant.
The said defendant, Annie q. Chadwick will
take notice That she mas been sued in the
above named court by Joseph j. CHADWICK.
and that the nature of said suit is 10 obtain n
decree of divorce dissoiving the bonds OF
and the above named plaintiff and that she
must answer the petition fled by the plaintiff
ON or befor the 2znd day of sepfember. 1891, or
the petition viii be faken as true and Judgment
render ed against her |