Wood River times. [volume] (Hailey, Idaho) 1882-1915, 1891-07-16

t"rif R.Puhii an papers which be-
liev-s in sonhi. g Peter to pay Paul.
Ii the sne-p men Ct q hix her prize,
then the consumer must pay = hix her
price, and who Is ben-6t-d The most
the few sh- pheris or the great armv
Of wage workers nth their fsniiies:
And We deny that cv-n the ah-ph-r is
.r the farmers are benefit. d, berause
thy cannot supply the 6ner wcols
that are NEEDED for general use With
our own. lie, tn. editor OF the TINES
90 into any furnishing goods store on
Wood River aud ascertain the quality
of 90 ,d> there He will find that the
American WOODEN products ar coarse
and unsalshie. while the foreign pro
dnc' ia immea-urahly superior and
preferred. To slluw raw foreign
whl> into our country tree would
give our inferior products chance,
xtenh the n,anufsctur- # articles at
h. me ani give mnre ws9e earner- n
chance. TIE Republican policy en-
deavors t. force dear az coarse pro.
ducts 90 the wage Garner. o. the
country. The wage workers, he,ng
IN the great m~j ri,v, are the ones
who pay the ,srif. and they are taxed
far hevo"d whA. is necessary
Wallace Press.
The aim Of protection is to "roh'
neither Peter nor Paul, hut to pre-.
vent either being rohhed Protection
chsap-ns every article whirhit ensb es
to he manufactured here, whil- r-r-
mtti' & manlf .cturer- to pay higher
Wages. Tie Manufacture c,n>..
quen'ly makes 4 smaller profit on
each nrtirl-, hu. larger rr..kt i" u .
aggregate nv >elli, z mere goods in .
market which is kept-or "pro'ect-d"
TOR h,m 4, the exclusion of TOR. ign
pauper snsr c"mp.titots. This II r..
X. the hume manu- ac.ur-r could u t
have At al, hut f"r The protection, As
he cannot, At FIRST, pr'.duce his ~.res
AS cmally IS Foreigners whose de
csd-s Of experience aud vast accumu.
lated wealth -nahle th-m to operst-
% an extremely narrow margin.
The assertions Of the Press regard
ing American wool. and American
~ % YET, While it.-S we're true SINE
y.sis ego, before IT, prot Give ,ans
tad rendered American cum petition
possible, are no longer 70. except e.
a very limited degree, and two to ave
sdoitioEsi years ui protection will Ell.
able US to surpass the word in ali
ma, ufac,ur-rs the raw materials for
which are procurxhl- ut home. While
c"nhden, Of the justice If this ass-r-
ton we are able to support it by
'ncont-stable .vld.nc-, presented
herewith:
AMERICAN VS. AUSTRALIAN WOOL.
report Of U. 5 Consul grimm from sydney, New
south Nsles
here sem, 10 Ue general i'm.
preston, here that American wouls are
not eqn.l in strength, fnen-s S. anu
lus,er to T. o.e grown IN Australasia,
and e.p-e'ali, ia Western Vlctoria
aud th- t'v-rina dis rict. The sample
OF American w'mIs, and especially
those grown Ia thu S'xtr o. Onio. sen,
I" the M-lhUurn- International Exh,.
bitioh dih much to r.muv- TIE false
impression in regard to American
~ools. ihrs- samples were aimi,trd
ny experts to h- far sup. rlor to any.
thing Of thu kind ever gown il these
colonies. American farmers, however,
have to admit that these woods can b.
mu' h more economically grown here
tnan III tie United States, or else
manufacturers could not afford TO pay
the cost If transportation aud thu
du'y OF 10 cents per pound upon
tn. m.