The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1891-09-25

siut !ubtS y. SeHTlet. Ill
Stiman Hubbard. transierred u several w G"i mil
eST 2ss 9 ss sfSuaS H. b to tns
sn n tbsss Any knowledge OF any other
WIZ to y from ny yany b% trom you to
NO, sir" said Mr.. scarles. with languid in
Mr.; Burley created quite n sensation by read
NEW YonE. Nov g, 1887.
ass nS s.tp;ea ,.rs
before sas i tsSev' your
That led the way to another sensational
asked fSWyer BsreS
+ 'a' i a 'fss Tss '9
hc, 4 think ,h.t It was before the marriage that
::%Sf q course. / dlinitt ike it,
II don't know that I can tell how it came to
Did y ! III believe tho story'"
., You had a talk with Mr., Timothy Hopkins
a'ts Ys the ! marriage on that topic'"
I'm the presence of his mother. wasn't III"
ns Ensn r he % yS Ss the, there was no
cho pssr nv was m;nd conversation 1t did not
him as to his informant. that the story came
from two sources. :, One was from Mr.. William
oa Witness somsSoGS lad ao Som ner To-
him asking him what ne know Of Mr.. Searless
s sss9 isa Hs ais" got es, 70 tn sans
ri. Sf d Els ss nj s sa Marriage
u sa1 his hfs a m
ssnt did MT kRow who used a. the
him that this letter came from Timothy Hop
KIM 4 from ssomsbHy In Nsw YORK
Witness said that Timothy Hopkins did tell
IFS track he said Hi he lad ses y into his
character because he wanted to know what
marry: Timothy asked the witness with ss'f II he ,
sn1 VA Sr him to do So
my track. didn't ike 10 be looked up in nj that lat
ma ma and on that subject he did not change
The sensStIon Of the. morning was the rcve:
from ,Ss
other hoirs the fact that Mrs. Hopkins had
given him the bulk Of her property. IN the az
sss:r!s; i produce another viii which had not
ydsi TINT tie estate q Mrs. Hepii ms should i
ward searics and HmeS a11 HepEfns 10 and and
the s9 BE- given to the
Thomas j. stilln,an: Edward F +. sesres. w and
Timothy Hopkins But tho most important
bea1 date Of a0 anS VS. .n Which, s2di 4s
voked the appointment Of Timothy Hopkins as
Of H' sG TsoS.. HnSs
sssea ThoHrs bd and Ewaa
NJ a @ n In
Tas +. ;Ss
Ana TIA. ,hS ssStIS. q ths later nsra@ss
esaxs @d asa. au geh
a@spt;; and had eyiassntiiy Sssn opened
! long tins sxuminins /: After sensaItatoa
time e tie I chain OF eSdenes o thas Sas
into their hands. but reserved it for, the next
cute the matter more carefully iIse' WIZ '''e''
Mr.; searles was again called to the stand.
eES ss crisis was e u vve Of e1
ed iha You 9eyeI knew q r. existence q
the present hearing ' g ''' WILL
Did You know that there was . document
EXECUTED cut lat at later date:'
Do You remember telling me in 40 many
words that there was no other will except the
Noy. Sonc and this one We are now upon p
MI !searles That was my, statement.
learning that there was a document in the
form q W. VIII executed at later r. date IN
Nov. 8. 1887. / know there was, n will exc
Ed M Sss T Sna sailed sd a5asS
"wtssre did TINT rrorositio5n come from to
ts s' q yss1 hGnsc at MetSssnS suppose Sc" YOU
80! heard Il. read In tho library Of my house
1T pldj tbs will express your desire as we'll as
III don't know. din't care so long as it was
II presume it made no difference to you
whether she gavo you one dollar or one mill
sT pot j! It were w. one s.I million or .ne
- on thsrs ,h shouted Nv sarley,0u
Of sSs TSs sns g s accept e aad S w.
N"Ths larger tho better" calculated Mr.
.p"SSa H. sa ss.@ 4E:e" Ts SeP sn sss s.
sho had made Two wilsT
II heard her state that she had made will
and given it all to her adopted son Timothy:
II was never discussed between us. She said
she made several Wills"
did she ever tel you that when her, former
s w2ss 81. .ca ~ hss In trust for her
The question came slowly and with great
dclibcraiion, Mr.. Searlcs answered it promptly
With an emphatic No; fir.
No. sir
Do you remember her telling you that she
told Timothy's natural mother that II she
would agree to let her ad9Gt the boy she would
can't say" was the hestating reply.
DO you know where the suggestion came
from to change tho will Of Nov. g. 1872"
did you know. at the time what these docu-
ments contained,this November VIII and tho
colicil in Iuncy'
NO sir"
"Thnt codicil was attached within thirty
days ~ the tim" of the execution OF the docm;;
mspt which has been submitted for probate"
Did You know at tho tim" what these docu-