New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1891-11-23

general tarih, what would tire Parliament have de-
ciaeo u would heve decided simply In @ general
way that the duties on sailed meats which are to-day
from to francs, viii be raised to 90 or o5 francs
To-Day the American salted meats are stopped By q
decree Of Introduction {" Very well ~ on the Right The
moment you deach the article relating to sailed meats
from the general tariff. 10 vote II In advance and
apart You Indicate by this very act to the Government
that you approve the removal Of the ntcrdcton and
hencefoth you share with the responsibility of this
measure.
Mr.. Frank Chauveau reporter of the b)-I ask the
Mr. Buffet responsibility, according to
me, very serious 1t Is impossible to discover another
motive fo the detachment of this article The prohi
bitson harng been established by decree the Govern
ment have it but then 1t is alone responsible
When YOU shall have voted, before the general tariff,
this special article your responsibility, repeat IT, VIII
be associated with that OF the Government. esfi-
mate that this responsibility is very heavy, ard Tor my
share, do not accept il.
few years ago the introduction Of trchnized meats
pointed out as one of the gravest public dangers.
The danger which the Government itself pointed out as
very great has It disappeared The necessity TO pro
tect the French consumer. has II disappeared
We are told that an inspection has been established In
The United states but that inspection is absolutely
udicroas since two inspectors must each day examine
/ think, 10000 or 10000 animals.
A Senator on the Left-That is not the question OF
fixing of the order of the day. Our vote does not In
any way prejudice the main question at issue.
THE AMERICAN DUTY.
Mr. Buffet beg your pardon. have probably not
made nv self we'll understood, but thought that had
explained to the Seuate why in deacng this article
the senate associated its responsibility with that of the
Government for the removal Of the prohibition They
speak of the claims Of friendly nation. If the Govern
ment had answered to the representative Of that naton
60 pressing in his claims DO You want us 10 apply
TO the American sailed meats the duties which YOU
Americans apply to the foreign sated meats, that Is
to say the duty of 81 francs per 100 hOgrammes oh
then, no more difficulties Instructions and preca'l-
tons become useless. Your tariff We appropriate 1t
10 ourselves, viii be infinitely more eihcent u pre-
serve There viii iouger enter one Hlogranilne
your sailed meas III our country. Would you COM
plain should We establish our frontier exactly the
duties which you yourselves think necessary for YOU
The Minster-We ect in the Interest OF france tfIo
teSiatioas on the kght)
MIR. butet-rnere IL no interest for the tNncn con-
sumer, for the price of sailed meats mas gone GOWN
since the prohibition of American salted meats.
Mr. Clamaa rsu-Because tie consumption has dimin-
ished. ~
Mr Bufet-when a nation has the most prohibtive
little ground to ask Of the other countries liberal
treatment. especially when the free admission can
compromise grsyesy the public health . .
The Minlster-lt is the debate OIL the question Itself
which you having to-day, now 1 ASK that IL De
fixed for Thursday only.
Mr. Buret-For nne the question of the order Of the
day settles the question.