The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1891-02-13

| Isaac Wilson, Frederick Nelson,
| VIM. H. Michael, B. Frank Webster.
| j. Wiley Norris, Ambrose Cooley,
| James 0. GOrrell. Nicholas ID. Amos,
| Samuel 5. James, Charles K. Creswell,
| Sylvester McGuigan, VIM. A. Wiley,
| Alex. G. MORGAN, Lawrence ForWood,
| Geo. X. Stephenson, Jarrett l.. Ward,
Robert Beard. VIM. Glenn, of Robt..
Theodore Crew, VIM. McNutt,
| Sylvester Phelps, John Lamb
Charles w. Gallup, J. F. Mitchell
Milton Bosley,
At the call of the docket, on Monday and Tues
| day, the following judgments were entered
Thomas j. Brooks VS.. Mary A. and Samuel Will
| for defendants.
Williams for plaintiffs. VanBibber for defendants
Mary b. Clayton vs.. w. III. Dozen. Harlan g.
Webster for plaintiff. Williams, Young. Maynadier
and VanBibber for defendant.
Amos Spencer VS.. James I. and Mary e. Hughes.
VanBibber for plaintiff:
Thomas E. Bond vs. w. Elwood Harry Harlan
| & Webster for plaintiff.
Roche & Co. VS.. John H. Hail. McNabb for
| plaintiff.
Witt, Biedler g. Co. VS.. w. H. Waters. ]. S.
Young for plaintiffs, Maynadier for defendant
Fred. j. Wands Aquilla H. and Frederick
Nelson: Williams for plaintiff, VanBibber for de-
Frick Bros s. CO. vs. Michael, Keen & Co. VIII
lians for plaintiffs, Hopkins and Preston for de-
PENDANTS.
Mitch and Kuhn vs.. same. Same counsel.
ii. & L. Hartman & Co. VS.. same. Same counsel.
The following cases were stetted
Michael q Bro. VS.. George nj. johnson. VIM.
Young for plaintiffs.
Bchard C. Murphy vs.. Nicholas N. Mock
Bradford and Cooley for plaintiff, w. II. Harlan
and 5. A. Williams for defendant
Same VS.. Republican Printing Company. Same
counsel.
Same VS.. Democrat Publishing Company. Brad
ford Cooley for plaintiff, Williams for defendant.
James +. Ashton VS.. same. Same counsel.
Robert Il. FOrw00d vs.. same. Same counsel.
John II. Bauer VS.. n. n. Mock. Bradford and
Cooley for plaintiff, Harlan and Williams for de-
PENDANT.
Same VS.. Republican Printing Company. Same
counsel.
Same VS.. Democrat Publishing Company. Brad
ford and Cooley for plaintiff, Williams for defend
ant.
Henry n. Bankard, Trustee, vs. Hugh Thomas
Amos ct al. Preston and W. b. Harlan for plain.
tiff Sitter for defendant.
Corbin Amos VS.. Corbin Amos, Jr., and Archer
Amos. Maynadier and Young for plaintiff, j. S.
Young for defendants.
Of.-Caroline Cornell, by her husband. &c., vs.
The B. Il o. Il. Railroad. Maynadier and Cooley
for plaintiff FanBibber for defendant.
Henry w. Archer, use OF Robert Archer, trustee.
&c. VS.. Frederick and Aqui.la Nelson. II. W. and
j. j. Archer for plaintiff, Stump for defendant.
On Thursday Mr.. L. Nj. Allen offered All order
relating to the care OF papers in pending cases in
the Clerks office. The practice is for attorneys to
take out papers, leaving receipt therefor in order
that they may be found when wanted. Occa-
SiOnay papers are passed from one lawyers office
to another and mlslaid. Mr. Allen wants to have
place set apart i'll the Clerks office where all
papers in pending cases shall be in charge of a
designated clerk, who shall allow no papers to be
taken out without receipt to be given in a book
kept for that purpose. Judge Walters said he
would consider the matter