St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1891-05-23

THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, RAMSEY
2 i county-DIstrict Court, Second Judi
cial District.
Lena NJ Christophel ct al against Katie
Albachten ct al.
At Chambers, May 14th, 1891.
Whereas, An action was commenced in
this court on April 23d, 1891, by complaint
filed, and a summons issued thereon. which
ing:
ssTTHE STATE OF MINNESOTA. RAMSEY
Il County-District Court, Second Judi
eial District.
Lena NJ. christophel. Carrie C. Christophel
aud Henry NJ. Christopher. minors, by The
st. Paul Trust Company, their general
guardian, and Harvey officer, guardian
ad litem, plaintiffs, against Katie AL
bachten formerly Katie ChristopheD and
Bernard Albachten. her husband; Lullers
Quinlan, John H. Allen. The Netherlands
American Land Company, Frank W.
Chase. Franklin G. Gerhard, Simon Miller
Theodore Hamm, The Commercial Ma
tional Bank of St Paul. Minnesota SOAP
Company, William g. Potts. and Peter T.
Potts, co-partners under the firm name
of Potts Brothers, w. II. Darby, Charles
Krest, and Charles Nyquist, co-partners
doing business under the firm name of
Exchange Laundry, defendants-Sum-
mons tor Relief
The State of Minnesota to the above-named
defendants, and to all persons unknown,
having or claiming an interest in the real
described in the complaint IN this action,
as follows:
1. Commencing forty-four and one twelfth
feet "a 1-12) south from the southwest cor
ner OF Fuller and Rice streets in the City OF
St Paul, thence west one hundred and
twenty-five feet Q25) more or less. to west
line of lot sixteen (16), thence south along
said west line forty-four and one-twelfth
IA 1-12) feet thence east one hundred and
twenty-five feet Q25), more or less, to the
west line of Rice street, thence north along
the west line OF Rice street, forty -four and
one-twelfth IA 1-12) feet to the place
street. and 125 feet in depth, and be-
ing the "A liz feet of lots sixteen
Q6l, seventeen Q7l and eighteen QS).
and of that part of lot nineteen (19) lying
number six 90 of A. G. Fuller's addition to
st. Paul, according to the recorded plat
thereof in and for said Ramsey county
2 The north forty four and one-twelfth
GA LIP feet Of lots sixteen Q6) seventeen
%, eighteen QS) and that part of lot nine
teen 40 west of Rice street, in block six (6),
in said A. G. Fnller's addition to st. Paul
according 10 said plat on file in said Office of
Register of Deeds, being same premises
purchased by Agnes Murphy, formerly Nc
earthly, of Emma Rauget, Nov II. 1873
3. Also the south forty-four and one
twelfth GA LIP feet of lots sixteen Q6), sew
enteen 40, eighteen t1S) and that part of lot
nineteen 40 west of Rice street in said
block six (6) of said addition being same
premises purchased by Agnes Murphy for
merly Mccarthy of Emma Rauget. Nov. II,
1878
You are hereby summoned and required to
answer the complaint of the plaintiff in the
above-entttled action. which complaint has
been duly filed in the Office of the Clerk of
said District Court. at the City of St Paul, in
said Ramsey county and TO serve q copy of
your answer to SAID complaint OH the snb-
scriber at his Office. in the City of St Paul. in
the said County OF Ramsey. within twenty
days after the service of this summons upon
you, exclusive OF the day of such service;
and, if you fail TO answer the said complaint
within the time aforesaid, the plaintiff in
this action will apply to the court for the re-
lief demanded In the complaint
Dated April 23rd. 1891.
/, lsignedl HARVEY OFFICER.
. Plaintiffs Attorney,
ST. Paul Mimi"
And whereas, the attorney of record and
guardian ad Item for said plaintiffs has this
day fled in SAID cause his AFFIDAVIT stating
that since the commencement of said action
he has discovered that William Hamm and
Joseph A. Blaeser ought in order to full
and Just determination of such action, to
have been made parties defendant therein,
and stating the reasons why said persons
ought to have been made defendants therein.
and has also filed In said cause an amended
complaint, in which said persons are named
as defendants therein, and which amended
complaint also states the reasons why they
ought TO have been made defendants in said
action, and which said reasons are deemed
sufficient by this Court;
Now therefore, in the name of the State of
Minnesota. you, the said William Hamm and
Joseph A. Blaeser and each of you, are
hereby ordered and required to appear and
answer the said amended complaint, within
twenty days after the service of this order
upon you, exclusive of the day of such serv-
ice: and in default thereof the judgment
and relief demanded in said amended COM
plant viii be rendered against you in all re-
spects as though you had been made party
to such action in the first instance.
ISignedl CHAS E. OTIS
Judge of D;gtrict Court.
HARVEY OFFICER
Attorney for Plaintiff.
Eudicott Block Fourth Street