Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1891-06-11

reversed and here reformed TO the effect
that appellee shall have sixty days in which
10 repay appellants said money. So or
Gered. Gaines, j.
J. W Nolan, tax collector. vs. san An
tonic Ranch Company; from Kinney. Suit
by appellee to restrain appellant as TAX COZ
lectOr of Kinney county from collecting
taxes on herd of cattle, appellee claiming
that taxes ON same had already been paid
in Maverick county. !. Under our present
Law all livestock should be listed for taxa
ton and the taxes paid in the county in
which the pastures are situated General
laws 1sS., p. lO9; General laws 1889, y.
2Hi. >. II was wholly unimpOrtant where
the management of the ranch was located,
or that the land used for pasture purposes
may not have been entirely inclOsed, or III
closed at all. 3. In the absence of proof 10
the contrary the assessment levied will be
presumed correct The judgement is re-
rcrsed and rendered for appellant as tax
collector for 1872 80. with costs of this court
and court below. So ordered. Stayton,
{. j.
T.. L. Angler ct uX. vs.. NJ. N. Coward ct
p; from Walker. Motion TO amend iudg-
ment. !. Where a motion 10 reform !
Judgment fails TO set out specifically 1.-THE
relief asked, same will be denied Over
ruled. Per curtain.
G. B. Spencer vs. s. Samuels, for use.
etc. from Falls. Motion TO affirm on GER
titicate. /. Abandonment OF appeal and
other necessary facts are shown. Affirmed
on certificate. Per curiam.
A. NJ. Stewart vs.. II. \. Standard from
Bandera. Motion to affirm on certificate.
/. The appeal herein was retuTlable TO the
last term of this court. A motion 10 affirm
on certificate comes too late at this term
Overruled and dismissed. Per curiam.
St Louis Cattle Company VS.. NJ. L.
Naught; from Mitchell Motion 10 file new
briefs |. The motion will be refused. but
leave Will be given 10 file new citation of
authorities. So ordered. Per curtain.
+. Auerbach ct al. vs.. r. X. Wylie ct al. 3:
from Taylor Motion 10 file briefs. l. The
parties 10 the motion, r. NJ. and II. A
Thompson, will be allowed to file briefs as
prayed for Granted. Per curtain.
Kicker, Lee & Co. vs.. d. D. Shoemaker:
from Dallas. On rehearing. /. Grounds
OF the motion not tenable. Former opinion
properly disposed of the case Overruled.
Per curtain.
City of FL Paso vs.. Mundy Bros. ct al. :;
from Fl Paso. Motion for precedence
l. Grounds set forth are such as under the
statute entities the cause to precedence.
CIauleu. Yer CuTlaU.
Annie H. Spear vs.. L. y Hobson: from
Denton. Motion TO affirm on certificate. /.
The motion is in due form and showing
necessary requirements, win be sustained.
Granted. Per curiam.
s. L. Ball VS.. Leopold NJ. Michael: from
BeNar. On rehearing. l. No sufficient
grounds are shown why the certificate for
atfirnance was not sent up last term.
Overruled. Per curtain. |
Sam trost's Heirs VS.. J. T. Davis: from |
Falls. Motion to affirm on certificate. |. |
The certi ficate of the clerk is defective be- |
cause it fails to show that an appeal was |
perfected, and neither does the record here |
show that any notice of appeal was given |
Dismissed Per curtain.
Jane Shaw ct al VS.. T. J. Self; from Fan |
min. Motion to affirm on certificate. /. |
The motion meets legal requirements and |
VIII be sustained. Granted Per curtain. |