Sturgis advertiser. (Sturgis, Dakota [S.D.]) 1887-1???, 1891-09-03

Mr.. Morrill, on the tariff of 1861 Not
only was he the chief and responsible
author of that tariff, but he was the
most notable victim of the wholesale
lying, which produced a temporary
fright and reaction with regard to it. If
pratectionists had taken alarm at the
defeat of so many of their friends last
November, and had been disposed to get
ready to back down from the legislation
of last year, they certainly would not
have selected Mr.. Mckinley for the first
high Office to which he could be nomin-
ated. We want no better champion in
this preliminary and most significant
struggle than Hon. William Mckinley.
Ohio is nominally a protectionist State.
1t is community made up of very diff
ferent elements. Tndustrially it repre-
sents pretty fairly the whole country.
Two fifths and more of its people are
farmers. The crop runs up into the hun
dreds of millions of bushels The tariff
has brought the manufacturer into close
neighborhood with the farmer, and has
created ample and steady markets for
food and other farm products. 1t has
utilized the natural resources of the
State, until the value of the manufact-
ured articles is now greater than that of
the farm produce. This diversiication
of labor has given the people freedom of
choice as to their occupation. Those
who have preference for the industrial
arts have q chance to find work in them,
instead OF being shut up to farming
alone. And the recent discovery of nat
ural gas under the soil of the State has
given a new impetus to manufactures of
all kinds by reducing the cost of power.
~ IL To- Fat, L. 4
whole country, and its share in the re-
dictionary "snap judgment" of 1890
makes it's impending choice of a Gov
view of the fact that both parties have
lection than on any other problem.
The issue in Ohio is between Free
Trade and Protection. There is much
less disguise and pretense now than
there was last November Those who
said tariff Reform" then say "Free
Trade" now. That of itself is gain to
the cause of Protection, which, in the
long run, will be found to more than
balance the loss Of the next House of
representatives The enemy have been
emboldened by their hit of success to
abandon their ambuscade and to @fight
in the OPEN" The American workman
who votes now for an enemy of our
Tariff does so with his eyes open. He
knows what to expect He solicits the
free competition Of the depressed and
underpaid labor Of Europe with his own,
and with the certainty that his wages
will go down to something like the Euro
pean level Ii he has grain of sense,
he knows that the reduction of Tariff
duties to a Free Trade level means the
repeal of the laws torbidding the impor-
tation Of labor under contract. These
laws are part Of the protective legisla-
ton OF the country. We cannot invite
the competition of European labor, and
forbid our capitalists to bring it into the
country for their own use It would be
as unjust as IL would be useless to insist
on such a restriction.
The American farmer also knows what
is ahead OF him. The opposition now
stands for the free Importation of Cana
dian farm produce, of Australian wool,
of every sort of food product from what
ever country can produce it cheaper than
we do. Their victory means the repeal
of the duty on wool. which has given a
fresh stimulus to Ohio's sheep-farming.
1t means the expulsion Of the annfact-
urer from the vicinity Of the farm, that
the farmer may have the joy of sending
all his produce over land and sea at his
own expense, and of bringing back a
scanty supply of manufactured articles
la exchange. 1t means a wholesale con-
version of our population from other in-
dustries to farming the conversion of
the farmers customers into his competit
ors in the food market 1t means vast
diminution in the purchasing power OF
the bushels of wheat and the carcass OF
pork, although this will be concealed
under the acheapness" of one half of the
farmers bargains.
III will mean no reduction In the cost
of living except through absolute cut
ting of OF comforts and Injuries that are
now enjoyed by all or nearly all. Instead
Of protective duties for the benefit of
American labor we shall see revenue
duties on tea, coffee, spices, sugar, an
the like to pay the expenses OF tho Gov
ernment The cost of housekeeping will
be no whit lower, although we shall have
no duties for the benefits of the American
producer
Under the Mckinley tariff the cost
.nf living has gone down There has
been at least no rise In the cost Of car
pets. clothing, hardware, food, and all
she rest. i have asked one home pro.
WIDER after another to tell me what arti-
eIe they pay more for than they did last