The record-union., 1891-11-20
SUPREME COURT.
IN RANK.


SACRAMENTO, November 10, 1891.
IA, 4,77S--WarnocKe VS.. Harlow ct al.-Mo-
tion 10 place cause on present Sacramento
calendar denied BY the Court.
14,S36-Cahiu VS.. Colgan-Pursuant to
stipulation on file, it is ordered that appellant
have thirty days 10 file brief; respondent ten
days to reply appellant five days 10 leolv
thereto, cause TO be thereupon submitted.
November 16th. BY the Court.
IA, 4,72S-Reclamation District No. 124 VS.
Gray-Application u place cause on present
Sacramento calendar denied. BY the Court
14,l54-Marriner VS.. Dennison-Rehearing
denied: November IS, 1881. The Court.
14,654-Bent VS.. Wilson-Pursuant To stip-
usGtion fled herein, it is ordered that the an
peal herein be and the same is hereby dis
missed. By the Court.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
Court met at 10 a. NJ Present-Paterson.
j., presiding; Harrison, j., Garoutte. j.; Me
Calvy, Deputy Clerk; Washburn, Bailin.
14,5T9 -Remmer vs.. Biasingame - Upon
motion of s. Il. abbott ordered that resl1ond-
ent have twenty days 10 file brieft; appellant
ten days TO reply, cause TO be thereupon sub
mitted.
14,597-C. P. r. r. Co. VS.. Beard of Equal
ization-Upon stipulation on file ordered that
the Judgment appealed from be and the same
is hereby reversed, and cause reInanded for
further proceedings.
14,4S9-Henlen VS.. Heilbron-On motion
of Houghton, of counsel for respondent. to dis
miss appeal herein, ii is ordered that res pond
ent be allowed TO file the afidavit OF @. A
HeVilen herein, and that appellants be
allowed TO file as counter aalGaVitS herein
CertlleG copies OF the aIfldtVItS OF George W,
Randall. Justin Jacol s, c. E. SluSe B. c.
MiclIly and II. ii. Webster, originals or which
were died in the court below in said case and
that respondent have ten days in which to file
and serve affldayits IN reply, should he be so
advised, and that thereupOn the appellants
may have ten days IL which to Iile points aud
authorities on the inotion to dismiss the
appeal and respondent ten days thereafter to
reply. 1t is further ord red that II said mo-
tion to dismiss appeal is denied. respondent
may have fifteen days thereafter TO lille brief
Oh the merits, ana appellants may have
twenty days thereafter 10 iile brief iii reply,
the cause on the merits 10 be thereupon Sub-
nitjed for decision. II isft2rther orGeted that
the motion of Houghton OF counsel for re-
spondent for correction OF The record on file
herein be granted, and that the papers re-
1erred to in said motion be flied as a part of
1he record on appeal herein
II, ,441-Hugfes vs.. EwiEg-Ar rgued by Cory
for appellant, Welsh for respondent Aotei-
liant allowed fifteen days to file closing brief
cause TO be thereUpon submitted
14,442-tresno National Bank VS. Hawk
ins-Argued by Cory for appellant Welsh for
respondent. Appellant allowed fifteen days
70 file brief. cause 10 be theTeupon submitted
ii, 509-Liilis KS. Enisrant Ditch Company
Argued BY Daggett for appellant. Resi- ond-
ent allowed thirty days 10 file brief. appellant
thirty days to reply, cause to De thereupon
submitted.
1A604-Yancy KS, Mcrton-Argried by
Graham for appellant, Cory Tor res pendent.
Appellant allow e nfIeen days TO HE brief
cause TO be thereupon submitted.
Court adjourned.
DEPARTMENT TWO.