Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1891-11-17
ade on the basis of cost and carriage of

DOCKET OF THE FoRTY-EIGHTH DISTRICT.
The following is the setting of the jury
civil docket of the district court (t'orty-
eighth district) Tarrant county, Texas, be-
ginning Monday, November %, 1891:
PAL. Robert Mozart VS.. A. B. Norton.
3635. j. L. Edwards VS.. Missouri Pacific
Railway company ct al.
1856. Chas. Martin vs.. ]. B. Watkins
ct al.
1894. W. A. Huffman vs.. Geo. Mulkey
1920. Jas. W. swayne VS.. W. H. H.
Wilson.
1929 W. ]. Bentley vs.. B. C. Evans ct al.
4455. Brown, Bros. & Co. vs.. Schwartz
Bros.
44s3 W. Scott VS.. Missouri Pacific Rail
way Company.
1888. J. +. Price vs.. w. W. Dunn.
1858. r. E. McAnulty VS.. Fort Worth and
Denver City Railway company.
WEDNESDAY.
1907. Gilchrist, Ramsay & Henderson VS..
Gulf, Colorado and Santa F'e Railway Com
pany.
1865. Fort Worth Board Trade VS.. Heck
& Baker.
Pacific Railway Company.
4729. John S. Andrews VS.. Gulf, Colorado
and Santa F'e Railway Company.
4731. Schneider & Davis VS.. Merchants
National Bank
THURSDAY.
4645. ]. R. Brown VS.. Texas and Pacific
Railway company.
4743. P. K Chase vs.. Texas and Pacific
Railway company.
4519. w. 7. Terry vs.. ". a. Huffman. 2
1919. c. Stills ct al. VS.. Fort Worth and
Denver City Railway company.
1850. NJ. Y. Miller VS.. E. X. Sigal ct al.
FRIDAY.
ID Inl ~ IN.nKy
ct ii.
4479. P. a CGsicl1 Us. Gulf, Colorado and
Santa F'e Railway company.
4545 Sam Evans vs.. Gulf, Colorado and
Santa t'e Railway company.
1856 Dan Garvey VS.. City of Fort Worth.
400 Heck & Baker VS.. William Bryce.
SATURDAY.
465l Charles Maurice VS.. Gulf, Colorado
and Santa Fe Railway company.
By order of court. l.. Il. TAYLOR.
District Clerk.
COUNTY CoURT-HON. W. D. HARRIS, JUDGE.
His honor called the non-iury docket for
setting for next week and then transacted
the following criminal business:
Bill tarr, Manuel Brinson, Bll
Brinson, Sid Chiles, Henry Chiles,
Henry Liggett. George Bagwell and jim
Anderson, all of them brothers in black, re-
siding at Arlington, pleaded guilty to the
charge of shooting 'craps," and were lined
therefor. Calvin Smith and Ben Bennett,
both Fort Worth '.coons," pleady guilty
and were fined for having INDUCED in so
cial game of CRAPS" Oscar Mccain of
Keller pleaded guilty to charge of throwing
| dice; Lewis Perry, colored, to charge OF
theft.
Ben Sanders beat up his vile and was
fined for aggravated asgault
Asa Curry pleaded guilty to having dis
| tuFbed religiout worship.
RnpprS nlp1lpi CrDlltV
disturbed the public peace by running his
| horse through the streets of Kennedale,
| and ''ponied up'' for the privilege.
The fines in all the above cases ranged
| from 80 to SO.
| Late in the afternoon Judge Harris heard
and granted application for writ of habeas
corpus prayed for by j. a. Prince; the
case will be heard to-day, nth instant
! Prince seeks to recover possession and care
of his one-year-old child, Lillian Prince,
alleged in petition for the writ, to be forci-
| bly, and Illegally detained by Dan Vaughn
and Maggie Vaughn. All Of the parties
| are alleged to live in this county.
| SETTING OF THE JURY CIVIL CASES.
The following is the setting of non-jury
| civil cases in the county court for Novem-
| Der term, 1891. Owing to the great num-
Der of cases set for Monday, November %,
| the setting for that day will not be pub
nshed. All cases on the non-jury civil
! be called for trial on Monday, November
%, 1891.
TUESDAY. NOVEMBER q.
3761. J. c. Terrell VS.. Riverside Street
! Railway Co. ct al.
316o G. W. Alexander VS.. e. 3. Dag
aett.
37779 L. W. Powell vs.. Riverside Street
| Railway Co. ct Il.
1859 f. B. Daggett vs.. Madam Porter.
| 1860. L. Is. Daggett VS.. Josie Belmont
4l3q Jackson Smith vs.. West Fort
Worth Street Railway Co.
1882. \. y. Green VS.. G. y. Hutchins.
! 42l5 John 7. Hughes Us. E. B. Daggett.
$50 \. J. Anderson VS.. d. l.. Newsome.
1913 a. j. Anderson VS.. j. NJ. Wilt.
| 1876. Mayer & Olsen VS.. Texas Brewing
! Co.
1853. C. H. Day vs.. W. H. Manchester
! ct al.
4212. William Munsen & Sons VS.. Bate
! man Bros.
| 42r1. Baker Gun s. Forg Co. vs.. a. j.
IS4S. \. ]. Anderson VS.. Frank Gill.
4354. O'NeiIl & Willing VS.. Pullman Pal
ace Car Co.
3s07. J. Steefel vs.. E Muller.
4l70. A Pub. Co. vs.. Imboden, Hamilton
& Wall.
1901 B. F. Eden VS., D. NJ. Osborne s. Co.
1902. Mrs. S NJ. Hunt VS.. Gid. E. John
! son ct al.
1882. Texas Spring Palace vs.. C. E. Trice.
1895. A NJ. Campbell VS.. City Of Fort
Worth.
1907. J. S. Nelson & Son vs.. hampton
44os ]. S. Nelson & Son vs., IS. NJ. Fry,
| garnshee.
44O9. W. H. Goodger & Co. VS.. LamptOr
| Bros.
44lO. w. H. Goodger & Co. VS.. S NJ
Fry, gaInishee.
All. Johnson & Murphy VS.. Lamptor
| Bros.
garnishee.
Bros. Cd q :
44l4 Edwin C. Burt & Co. vs.. S, NJ. Fry
| garnishee.
44lS. W. J. Bailey VS.. L. August.
44l9. VIM. j. Bailey VS.. Jno. G. Phelan
garnishee.
4422. Britain, Smith & Co. vs.. Jno. c
| Phelan. garnishee.
| jackson, garnishee.
444l. Britain, Smith & Co. VS.. o. NJ
Kern, garnishee.
4442 Britain, Smith & Co., VS.. Chas
Waggoman, garnishee.
HIS II. Dutard VS.. Bateman Bros.
400 Mary \. Fender VS.. George Robert
son, garnishee.
44G1 Mary A. Fender, VS.. ]. J. Mush
andy. garnishee.
4462. Fort Worth Drug Company VS.. ]. B
Solomon.
Bateman Bros.
1889. L. Bagden & Co. vs.. hampton Bros
1893 j. 8. Applewhite VS.. NJ, Il. & L
Ry. Co.