The morning news. [volume] (Savannah, Ga.) 1887-1900, 1891-07-14
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS.
a Big Batch Handed Down at Atlanta
Yesterday.


Yesterday.
ATLANTA. GA, July 13.-The following
decisions we're handed down in the supreme
court this morning:
Cunningham vs.. Scott; from Fulton Dis
missed.
Central Railroad Company vs. Summer
| ford: from Lee. Affirmed
Moore vs. Garland from Crawford. Al
| firmed.
Affirmed.
Mcneil VS.. Hammond; from Bib. Re-
McGee VS.. Potts; from Crawford. At
! frmed.
/ COMPANY: from Crawford. Affirmed.
paws VS.. the East Tennesses, Virginia
and Georgia Railroad Company; from
B BIB. Reversed.
small VS.. the Georgia Southern and Flor
ida Railroad Company; from Bib. AT
hrmed
Miller VS.. Miller; from Baldwin. At
Mayor and Council of Nilledgeville VS..
Brown: from Baldwin. Affirmed.
Fleet wood VS.. Lord; from Wilkinson.
Reversed.
DFoOm va. OdNlS' 4IOLn bieSuo IEe'
Versed.
Georgia Railroad Company VS.. Rhodes;
from Albany. Affirmed.
Fuller & Oglesby VS.. Vining; from Nor
gan Reversed.
Wilson VS.. the state from Monroe. Re-
versed.
Berry VS.. the state from Henry. At
frmed.
Low vs. SuRgs; from Epson. Affirmed.
BlalocE VS.. INLAND from Pike. Affirmed.
Collins VS.. Powell; from Rockdale. AZ
frme1.
Sims VS.. the state; from Rockdale. At
frmed.
Aycock VS.. Austin; from Rookdale. At
frmed.
Woods VS.. Woods from Henry. Affirmed.
Bryans vs. Almand; from Butts. Re-
versed.
Stafford VS. Thomas; from Pike. Af-
frmed.
Greer VS.. the state from Butts. Reversed.
Harvey VS.. West from Fayette. AZ
f1rmed
Mangbam vs.. the state; from Troup. AT
frmed.
Brewster VS.. Hamilton from Polk. At
firmed.
Logan VS.. Western and Atlantic Railroad
Company from Gordon. Dismissed
Affirmed.
Lukens vs.. Ford; from Whitfield. At
6rmed.
Stafford VS.. Maddox; from Whitfield.
Reversed.
Jordan VS.. Grogan; from Cherokee. At
frmed.
Pool vs. the stare from Hall. Reversed.
Jones We. the state: from Oconee. Az
frmed.
Lampkins VS.. che state; from Clarke. At
firmed.
Weed VS.. the mayor and aldermen of
Savannah; municipal corporations assess
ments for street improvement constitutional
law; injunction. Before Judge Falligant
of Chatham superior court The special
act of Sept. 4, 1885, empowering the mayor
and aldermen of Savannah to improve the
the streets and levy local assessments there
for is not unconstitutional because it is a
special law, or for any other reason brought
to the attention of this court. There was
no abuse Of discretion in denying the tenn
porary injunction prayed for. Judgment
affirmed.
Startling vs. Thorn; from Buloch. Re-
versed.
Bank of the State of Georgia vs.. Porter;
from Fulton. Affirmed.
Swift Specific Company We. Jacobs; from
Fulton. Affirmed.
Kenny VS. Wallace; from Fulton. Trans
ferred 20 the next term.
Gresham VS.. the Equitable Life and Ac-
cident Insurance Company; from Fulton.
Affirmed.
Central Railroad Company VS.. Rylee;
from Fulton. Reversed.
Atlanta and Florida Railroad Company
VS.. Wright; from Fulton. Reversed.
Finch VS.. Barclay; from Twiggs. Re-
versed.
Central Railroad Company VS.. Brunswick
and Western railroad; from Dougherty.
Affirmed.
Morgan VS.. Harold from Sumter. At
firmed
Mayf1eld vs.. Savannah, Griffin and North
Alabama Railroad Company; from Spald-
ing. Affirmed.
Van Pelt VS.. tho Home Building and Loan
Association; from Fulton. Reversed.
Ex-parte Calhoun, ordinary of Fulton.
Affirmed.
Trippe VS.. McLaiu; from Barlow. Re
versed.