The Ohio Democrat. (Logan, O. [Ohio]) 1886-1906, 1891-07-25
MONEY IN SHEEP
Unquestlonably One of the Most FroHta-
BILE branches of Agriculture

UnqueHttonably Ono OF the MOSS prOhta-
BILE Branches of Agriculture.
There are few more profitable
branches of agriculture even on the
nigh-priced lands of the eastern and
middle states than sheep breeding and
wool growing. 1t is true that wool
can be produced more cheaply on the
large plains of Australia and the cheap
land of our own southwestern states
than on land worth perhaps from $50
to Sl0O per acre. But the question OF
the relative cheapness of production
has little to do with the profit of sheep
husbandry on the bigkar priced lands.
While sheep can be bred aud wool pro
duced at small cost in Australia, yet
as an offset to this advantage they
have no home market there sufficient
to consume the product, and when
farm products are obliged to cross the
ocean for market the profit of pro-
duction' is materially lessened. In
other words, we produce in New Eng
land and the middle states wool which
sells in our market in competition
with wool grown in Australia. While
our cost of production is greater our
cost of transportation is much less, and
on the whole we average more profit;
and again, our fat sheep and spring
lambs never go begging for a market.
and on the whole there are few indus
tries that will pay the farmer more
good money for less work than sheep
growing. If the farmer who keeps
sheep pays fair amount of attention
to his flock and uses average intelli-
gence the profit from his flock can be
materially increased Early lambs of
a good mutton breed will always com
mand good price in the home market.
Iudicious care at the right time will
usually prevent losses among the young
lambs And again, unless the flock is
of excellent quality to start with,
judicious breeding and selecting the best
bred ewes to remain in the flock will
be apt to increase the average clip o1
wool several pounds per head.
The one great drawback, however
and it exists in all thickly settled
countries, is the ravages of worthless
ours. Two or three dogs in single
night will destroy good sheep and
lambs enough to offset the greatest
prospective profit for an entire season.
If there is any one evil that requires
more stringent legislation than another
it is the dog nuisance. There is hardly
any family so poor as not to be rict
enough to own dog, and the pleasure
and comfort of that useless cur they
will protect by every means possible
always ready to deny the possibility O.
their dog doing any injury. One of thC
best means for protecting the hocl
against the attacks of dogs is by using
liberal number of sheep bells. l.
the flock numbers forty or fifty, a
least quarter of them should have
each small bell, and as noisy one al
possible, attached to her neck. If thu
flock is small a greater portion shoulC
possess bells. The reason why tNll
are a good protection is because sheep
killing dogs are naturally sneaks. The.
are afraid of detection, and the nois
created by flock of sheep wearing
bells will cause them to desist. / hav
never known a flock of sheep wearing
bells to be injured by dogs. We nee
more stringent laws for the protection
of sheep American Agriculturist.