Feliciana sentinel. [volume] (St. Francisville, La.) 1877-1892, 1891-02-07
Kii.c&.by Liss =

Killed by LiH -
--,ofs sof H. pro-pov-
-Rr-s..A tho sciat1orm that the land
value tax will mover be accepted by
farmers or small home owners. II that
tax were Whist its ignorant opponents
describe - these classes would be hos
tile; but whom the farmer and rural
home owner learn what the tax Is, n
those Of New York State will In the
political campaign this fall, they will be
even more eager to adopt it than the
artisan classes Of the city have been.
VT. Hopkins, of Entsrprine. Kan,
forwards . clipping from q paper Of his
State which gives fair idea Of the way
the land value tax is mirepresented to
farmers After long statement OF
what he supposes the land value tax to
be and how it would affect the interests
of farmers, the editor says: This is .
plain and simple statement OF the
Georgian land tax theory, put in the
vernacular of the common people. II
would be better English and nearer the
truth to say that it is = statement of the
Georgian land tax theory, put into the
vernacular Of an ignorant editor.
According to this Kansas quill, ''under
the George regime, the lawyer, the
doctor, the merchant, the manufacturer
men Of every trade and profession
who own no land and who only repres-
emit billions Of dollars worth OF per
sonal property-will escape all taxation,
and the whole burden will be thrown
upon the farmer and home owner, ex-
cept where business men carry OF en-
terprises in their own stores and mills. }"
There is more ignorance to the thou
sand ems in this quotation than there
are puns in the funniest of Tom Hoods
jingles.
Until we raise up a class Of lawyers,
doctors, merchants and manufacturers
who can live without land, we shall
have no man of either class who, under
the land value tax, can escape his share
of public burdens. They all pay land
value tax now and to the full annual
value of the land they use; but it goes
into the pockets of landlords instead OF
going into the public treasury.
This Kansas editor seems to think
that a man who did not own the land
he used would be untaxed. 1t is true
he would not pay any more for the land
than he pays now, but he now pays all
he ought to pay. The trouble is that he
pays the wrong man. He would pay no
less under land value tax except as
the land he used fell in value, but so
long as that land had a value he could
not escape taxation. And he ought not
to pay for any thing but the land value
he appropria:es. That, and that alone,
of his wealth is produced by the com
munity. and belongs to the community;
his personal property and land improve
ments being Of his own production, the
community has no right to take them.
When the community compels him to
paw for the land value he appropri-
ates it takes only what belongs to 1t;
but when it compels him to give up to
it of the products Of his labor one PEN
nv over and above the land value he
has appropriated it robs him.
1t is not true, however, that lawyers,
merchants, manufacturers and doctors
represent billions of dollars worth OF
| personal property. What the astute
Kansas editor means by personal prop
erty NAV be itemized as railroad stock,
| corporation and government bonds, and
SO on. OF the value of this class OF
property, very little is a property value
at all. So much of corporation stock
and bonds as represents actual labor
products, like rolling stock, rails and
stations, is property value, and ought tc
| be free of taxes; first, because the com
munity did not produce these things
and second, to encourage the produc
| ton of more. But so much of such
| stock and bonds as represents specla
| privileges and water" is a mere device
of robbery, bearing a relation to the in
dustry of our time similar to what
pirate ships bore to commerce a few
| generations ago.
When we propose to exempt labor pro
ducts from taxation, we mean Labor
products. AS for public franchises thai
are special privileges, we would abolish
them altogether.
And how about the whole burden o.
taxation being thrown upon the farmer
| and home owner?
The Kansas editor will certainly ex
clude tenant farmers. 1t is strange
that he does not classify tenant farmer
with men of every trade and profes
sion VINO own no land;" for surely i
doctors are to escape taxation tenan
farmers will too. The truth is that ten
ant farmers, like doctors, will pay tn
same ground tax that they do now, ex
cept as it falls in consequence of the fal
of land values, and that what they pa.
will find its way into the public treasur.
instead of settling, as it does now, II
the Golfers of landlords.
And why does not the Kansas edito
classify mortgaged farmers with doc
tors, lawyers and merchants? Tn
mortgaged farmer is to the extent of hi
mortgage, a tenant farmer.
That the whole burden OF taxation
will be thrown upon farm owners an
home owners is false upon the face o
it. How about mine owners? Ho,
about factory owners? How abou