Middlebury register. (Middlebury, Vt.) 1886-1937, 1891-12-11
ADDISON COUNTY COURT.

Il Al
Wy p ,i.i w. i,; ''ioi n'.'s
,t; Ooup.G ~" 91 ~ W NJ
| ~ 49,. - ~ 9'
80 ,., 80 10 ,i,, h' ,,,,, ~
i ~, - ,'''e.'.'' NJ 'i''7 nv
laval - ,,f,'israhI,, sn,,a,,t,. Han nnm-
r D',i;,9 ioi. IS az.
,ho ',ot;,io,or and iit-n WI y Had io 20
n,,;',, o,', o,d I'" I,,dno 1on'os n ui,Ja
f"r ' ,i,S '1 ,a,i,"no iii nnd aiin ,,"u
,, va Wv, ,r,, pt,i''' "'''"'
i,iii u.oo rra,tod :, Io,,,io poo,
,.s W;ii;,,, poc,, fn,. ,,iif,i daSar
lion Irasa r',,;aS .,ro fron, pristoI
Ihora ,,,s n bon,ing IN V.iI g Stof-
ford vs. YIN Whittnmnre in which .
nniitinn was nnhnld sntting aside a ms
lea ;ndgment Vail e S1atinrd asi,od
fn, an ,,,,a,l ,t - imsti,,, ,n,,rt in Ri,,Yon
some time ayo aid the iusticp claimed
thnv did nor offpr any securities wbern-
unon he q.va iudymnnt ngainst tham
"A hilI was granted. with alimonv. for
intoInr.hln snTnritv in Init. Il smith W
| A.. II S,nitb of Sbornham
In the divorce case of John ID Sam
dors vs Della NJ. Sanders thn netition
was set aside because the nortins had
Iived tovpthnr since the drawing of fine
netition They arc Niddlphurv n, onle.
A hill was granted to Rotsv Rrooks
from inhn Rrools hnth IF sharks
hnrn fu, vrilful do..rtinn
Nondnv aftn,nnon the case of state W.
VIM II Ghillsou wns talinn mn 4 LARGO
n,rt nf rho afternoon was nrcuniad In
nn,n.,nnoIing a ;nry
Gtato.s l7tnrnny Fish and Mr. Willis
ma ~ i,,r,.',ne fnr tio St,tn a,,d NJ,
NCGottricl, ~ r. Alhans for tha rasnon.
da,t ur Wilds mr. in rho evidanca for
:
d dm1 ,,, ,"r,ino Iio sho,xnd H., rho raiirond
"aio;.'IS thoir svsten, IF disnatrhimg
,rninS tbat rho orders r,ven Cbillson
ti'a Az, af ,,o o,oiao,,t noro ~, ron,,l,r
and ,L.t o,.arv inty on tboir n,rs ,,as
III, .e I, -. H. ,,,,,
onnii p,,,,,,i,,tondont nf th, CartnnI a.
,,"n+ tpstifad ~ Ghillson's Gnod ,I,.r.,,-
,",. ,,n,t ,h,t ho had na,,a, i,aa,, ,,,,iit,, os
,',',rI;lrann - ri ,n,;da,7t ~
W .Is ;,'tnod,,od oomeiIan.,Lio o,.;
,,o m nf - dac,',nont.,r, cbarantor tho
~, w. a';H,'d o,a ~, ~;
Jn i", ~ IS " @ ~, hnti, no franz -,
hrn,,,ht in r. show tbo Want md ,h,r-
n'.,nr'' f ,ho ,nnid,nt ,rho Sta.o.s ,.a.o
,''e h,.;on,. III. Ghillsnn etortod ,m,r
IN 1sSo From, ~ tlh,ns in ch.,rro If an
,,''ri,,o ,,t.,nIad tna s,,n.i,. hn,r t..,;n
.,''.' ~, "a 80 r.'- t I',,'.
LEI, ~ a
,,Ui' wa, W pi1,,in tina .t,l ~ ~
"'i' u,,.' "" ssi, '''''I Th ",,o NO We
5,.,i,.,'I ,'r,I.rD ~ r,,,, tn p,,Iiu,rtnn .nI
,,oat trai,, ~ IN. Han f., Ch.'intt,. 'md
,naot Tn - A. Ch.rIott. hn rncci,.nd
nr,nrs tn n,.nt \n 90 at Marin Ferris.
huTgh. AZ that train was late. He mel
\n 10 .t \nrth FrrrishurUh and the,
went ON. forUetriuu fine snecial eyrur
sion train from Rutland. The result wa.
the collision near Brooksyille and the
deaths of Enuincpr Embrcy and Couduc.
tor Blodyett of the excursion train and OF
: VIM II. Allen of Ferris burgh. a a>sen
ger on that train.
When the States case was in Mr.. Me
Gettrick moved IA verdict for the defend
at on several technical grounds, prinCi
pallV because Conductor Button should
ne claimed. have been Jointly iudicte,
with Chillson. His motion was over
ruled and exceptions taken.
The defence consisted of the testimony
of Chillson alone. Ills story was aS fol
lows: For a week or more before the ac
cident he had been suffering much phys
ically and did not consider himself tit fol
duly. For few days previous to Aug
30 lie had been running an engine tron
White Riyer Junction to Burlington OF
the other side of the mountain. He madt
this trip the night before the accident
He then told his superintendent that h,
was unfit for duty, that he was soon t,
be married and that he was unwilling [,
make another run. He WAS told that hi
services could not be dispensed will
quite vet. bur that if he would make ON.
more trim he could law of until he ,yn
able to work again Then he rnnsentn,
n mnle rho tr;,, vitb tho hoo tr,in m,