The record-union., 1891-03-11
VICTORIOUS REPUBLICANS.
Their Entire Ticket Elected With But
One Exception.
Buckley and Putnam Make a Pho.
nomenal Run = Morrison the
Only 'sOutsidern Elected.
The election is over.

The election is over.
For the ''ensuing term" Alonzo Conk-
lin will occupy the honorable office of
Third Trustee; Captain J. D. Young will
be the City Auditor; j. J. Buckley, AS
SCISSOR; George A. Putnam, Collector:
John We'll, Fire Commissioner for the
long term, and j. NJ. Morrison, Fire
Commissioner for the short term.
The special tax also received the neces-
sary two-thirds vote to carry it.
The Republicans came within an ace of
making clean sweep. The only candi-
date they lost was the short-term Fire
Commissioned. M. Morrison defeating
w. B. Miller by several hundred votes
This was due, however, TO the fact that
Mir. Morrison had the backing of two
parties against Mr.. Miller's one.
FIRST DISTRICT.
The First District polled good average
vote. 1t was apparent during the dav
that the Republican ticket was Running
ahead, but the members of that party did
not allow themselves to be carried away
with enthusiasm, and Staid at the polls
working hard for their candidates until
| the last dog was hung SO to speak.
In the First Precinct 81 votes were
cast, as follows: For the tax 2S3; against.
-; Conklin (R.), o05; Ruhstaller (D.), l06;
Young (R.(, 223; Harrison d., Al; Chip
man Co, a; Buckley QR.), 2GS; Hawley
Co, 20; Putnam (R), 259; Smith co., IS.
Fire Commissioner--long term = We'll,
20; Fire Commissioner IS short term
Miller (R.), 233; Morrison Cd. and C.). 70.
The Second Precinct polled $40 votes, as
follows: For the tax, 267; against, 7S;
Conklin, 1877; Ruhstaller, I5O; Young, I2I;
Harrison, lG0; Chipman, l27; Buckley,
2li; Haw!ey, IS; Putnam, 24l; Smith, SIS:
Well, 295; Miller, l57; Morrison, 1872.
In the Third Precinct 2G7 votes were
cast. Fer the tax, 203; against, IS: Conk-
lin, l4S; Ruhstaller, rs; Young, IO6: Har-
rison, 73; Chipman, SS; Buckley, l57;
Rawley, S.; Putnam, isl; Smith, SO;
We'll, 2l3; Miller, HI; Morrison, $50.
The Fourth Precinct showed up with
267 votes. They were as follows: For the
tax, 203; against, 5S; Conklin, 224; Rub
stailer, 169 Young. l45: Harrison. 100.
Chapman, lbs; Buckley, 2ll; Hawley, l33:
Putnam, 226; Smith, lis; We'll, 3l5; Mil
Ter, 147; Morrison, 245.
SECOND DISTRICT.
The Second District, as usual was the
scene of more life than the others COM
bined, particularly in the First and Second
Precincts. There was plenty of the old
time wire-pulling, and button-holing
around the polls, and large crowds Of
| loiterers.
At the First Precinct polling place 25s
votes were cast as follows: For the tax.
POI; against, 81; Conklin, l5S; Ruhstaller,
SO; Young, 81; Harrison, IS; Chapman, 20;
Smith, 90; We'll, 169; Miller, 12l; Morri-
| son, 137.
Two hundred and seventy-four votes
were east in the Second Precinct. They
were as follows: For the tax, PA: against
81; Conklin, 14S; Ruhstaller, l23; Young,
l3a; Harrison, a.; Chipman, 90; Buckley,
Iy9; Hawley, 33; Putnam, 2O4; Smith, "A;
We'll, 274; Miller, 155; Morrison, ll6.
In the Third Precinct 334 votes were
cast and summed up as follows: For the
| tax, 24G; against, 81; Conllin, Us; Rub
| staller, l53; Young, 104 Harrison, SO:
Chapman, 40; Buckley. 1876; Hawley.
ll3; Putnam, 202; Smith, 103; We'll, go;
Miller, 129; Morrison, 205.
In the Fourth Precinct 294 votes were
cast, as follows: For the tax, 202; against,
90; Gonklin, 1914; Ruhstaller, 50; Young,
95: Harrison, rs; Chipman, l22; Buckley.
10; Hawley, 10Y; Putnam, III; Smith
81; We'll, 246; Miller, 12l; Morrison, l73.
! In the Fifth Precinct 339 votes were
cast as follows: For the tax, 256; against,
50; Conklin, 1913; Ruhstaller, 146; Young,
| 100; Harrison, los; Chipman, IlO; Buck
| ley, 2lO; Hawley, Sc; Putnam, 203; Smith,
Sc; We'll, 253; Miller, 137; Morrison, POI.
| THIRD DISTRICT.
| Voting throughout the Third District
was very quiet and light. 1t was here
that the adherents of Ruhstaller expected
to make large gains, but the returns show
| that they were disappointed.
In the First Precinct 239 votes were cast
| In the following manner: For the tax, 162.
| against, 10; Conklin, 104; Ruhstaller. l3i:
Young, 81; Harrison, rs; Chapman, 70;
Buckley, 80; Hawley, so; Putnam. l46:
Smith, 5S; We'll, 1I3; Miller, 81; Morrison,
III.
Second Precinct-262 votes cast. For
the tax, 194 against, 6S; Conklin, IA,
Ruhstaller, lis; Young, 10l; Harrison, 81:
Chipman,, iO3; Buckley, 14s; Hawley, Il2;
Putnam, l67; Smith, IS; We'll, 232; Miller,
/ 10Y; Morrison, 154.
Third Precinct-277 votes cast. For the
tax, 195; against, 81; Conklin, 157; Ruh-
staller, l20; Young, 93; Harrison, Sc;
Chapman, rs; Buckley, 154; Hawley, lO3;
| 81; Morrison, 1876.
Fourth Precinct-Two hundred and
sixty-six votes cast. For the tax, I93:
against, Y; Conklin, 172; Ruhstaller. 90:
Young, 80; Harrison, so; Chipman, III;
Buckley, l37; Hawley, 107; Putnam, l43:
Smith, l02; We'll, 226; Miller. los; Morri-
son, 162.
Fifth Precinct-Two hundred and
sixty-one votes cast. For the tax, 149:
against, 1l2; Conklin, 140; Ruhstaller, l2l:
Young, ss; Harrison, 65; Chapman, los;
Buckley, l30; Hawley, III; Putnam, 1872;
Smith, 80; We'll. 202; Miller, "a; Morrison,
TT.
Sixth Precinct-Three hundred and
ninety-eight votes cast. For the tax, 26S:
against, 100; Conklin, 236; Ruhstaller, 1852:
Young, 142; Harrison, 81; Chapman, l54:
Buckley, 234; Hawley, 142; Putnam, 2i2;
Smith. l25; We'll, 235: Miller, los; Morri-
son, $50.
IN A NUTSHELL.
The following table, showing the COM
plete returns, with totals, on each candi-
date voted for yesterday, was prepared
last night by the RECORD Z MON corps:
s=s-sa-e--so-.A-os