The Londonderry sifter. (South Londonderry, Vt.) 1883-19??, 1891-06-12
Mathew sullivan VS. Daniel W. Brosnehan

Mathew sullivan VS. Daniel W. Brosnehan
and X. 7, Ryan, trustee.
State of Vermont windham County Court,
March Term, 1891
Whereas Mathew sullivan of Brattleboro in
said Windham county, on the 18th day of April
A. d. 1890 sent out his writ of attachment
against Mathew W, Brosnehan then supposed
to be of Denver In the state Colorado, declaring
against him the said Brosnehan, for that the
said defendant on the day of the date of said
writ at said Brattleboro was indebted to said
plaintiff in the sum of eight hundred dollars, as
well for so much money before that time had
and received by the said defendant TO the plain
tfrs use; and for other money by the plaintiff
before that time laid out and expended for the
use of said defendant at his special request and
for other money before that time lent and ad.
vanced by the plaintiff to the said defendant at
his like request; and for goods, wares and mer.
chandise before that time sold and delivered by
the plaintiff to the defendant, and for labor
done and performed and material found in and
about said labor by the plaintiff for the defen-
dant and at his like request and being so indebt-
ed the said defendant promised to pay him said
several sums on demand, yet though requested
has neglected and refused so to do. Which said
writ was made returnable before the county
court then next to be held at Newfane within and
| for said county on the second Tuesday of Sep
TENDER A. ID, $780, and was directed to any
sheriff or constable to serve and return, who
was also therein commanded to summon n. T.
| Ryan of said Brattleboro as trustee of the said
defendant, and to appear at said term of court
| and make disclosure according to law, of the
goods, chattels, rights and credits of the said de-
| PENDANT which he the said Ryan might have in
| his hands and possession. That said writ was
duly served on said n. T. Ryan, trustee, on the
18th day of April 1890. That at the September
term 1890 of said county court said writ was du
ly entered for trial, but it appearing that the
saiG Daniel W. Brosnehan had not been notified
thereof, said cause was continued for notice to
the said defendant to the next term of said court
to be held at Newfane aforesaid on the second
Tuesday of March A. D. 1891. And now at said
March term, 1891 of said court it still being made
to appear that the said defendant had not been
notified of the tendency of said suit, was by
said court ordered that said cause be continued
to the September term 1891 of said court, and
that the said plaintiff cause notice of the penden
cy of said suit and the term of court to which
the same stands continued to be given the defen-
dant by publishing the substance of his said
writ together with this order for three weeks
successfully in the Londonderry SITTER, q
newspaper published in Londonderry in said
county of Windham, the last publication to be
at least twenty days previous to the term of the
court to which said cause stands continued
which said publication shall be deemed
sufficient notice for the defendant to appear and
make answer and defence to said suit if he shall
see fit.
Given under my hand at Brattleboro, this 2sti
day of April, A. d. 1901.
ROYAL TYLER, Clerk.
Haskins & Stoddard, Plaintiffs Att'ys