The record-union., 1891-08-06
SUPREME COURT MINUTES.
DEPARTMENT ONE.

MONDAY, August 3, 1891.
14.1S1-Reed ct a.. VS.. Ring ct al.-On
motion ordered that cause stand submitted
on briefs on file.
13,G53-Smith VS. Worn; 4,229-Burnett
VS.. IIyford; Is, 3,346-Godfrey VS. Godfrey;
13,5G7--Luck VS.. Luck; 13,623-Visher VS..
Brtlsie; l3 ,624-Visher VS.. Brusie-Ordered
above causes be continued until 10 a. NJ. to-
morrow.
Adjourned.
13.31S-Hinkle VS.. Observation-Disclosures
affirmed. Harrison, j. We concur: Paterson,
j., Garoutte, J.
13.265-Jones VS.. Tallant-Judgment and
order affirmed. The Court.
TUESDAY, August 4, 1891.
10, 2,902-BacOn vs.. SonOma County Land
COMPANY et al.-By consent, ordered cause be
continued for term.
l3,O77-People ex rel. English ct al VS.
Kerwin ct al-PUrsuant to stipulation filed
herein, ordered that cause be continued for
13.o79-13, 3,0SO-Vulcan Powder Company
VS.. Hercules Powder Company ct al.-On
motion of Pillsbury, ordered cause be placed
at foot OF term calendar
13, ,2SS-PeOple VS.. La Rue ct al.-Pursuant
to stipulation filed herein, ordered that appel
lants have thirty days from date within which
To file and serve their opening brief, respond
ent fifteen days TO reply, appellant ten days
to answer thereto, cause to be thereupon sub
mitted.
229-Burnett vs. Lyford. administrator.
etc.-Argued by MeKinstry for appellant,
Mahoney for respondent and submitted.
13,29O-Benson, etc, VS.. c. Z. r. K. Co.
Pu1S lanl 10 STIPULATION uleu herein, ordered
that appellant be allowed thirty days within
which to file his brief respondent thirty
days to reply, appellant fifteen days within
which to file closing brief, cause to be there
upon submitted.
13,3OS-Gireen VS.. Redding-On motion of
Pillsbury, ordered cause stand submitted upon
briefs on lille.
13,567-Luck vSLuck-On motion, ordered
that cause be continued to foot of term calen-
dar.
I3,346-Godfrey VS.. Godfrey-Motion to
6jc1Ho hN-I
liant, Davis and Foote for respondent, ordered
that appellant have five days within which TO
file brief on motion TO dismiss appeal same to
be thereupon submitted further ordered that
cause be continued TO foot of present term cal
endar.
l3.653-Smith VS.. Worn-Argued by Rear
dan for appellant, ordered that appellant be
allowed twenty days to file brief, cause 10 be
thereupon submitted.
3,o44-Shepperd VS.. Fyrer-On motion of
Cole, ordered that cause be submitted upou
briefs on file.
i3623-13, 3,624-Visher VS. Brusie-Pursu-
ant to stipulation FLED herein THAT appellant
herein consent to an order of this court con
tirming the judgment upon which this appeal
Is taken, and respondent shall not cause the
issuance of an execution upon said judgment
until after the expiration of thirty days after
the remittitur shall have been received in the
lower court ordered that judgment be
affirmed.
Adjourned until 10 A. NJ. tomorrow.
DEPARTMENT Two.
TUESDAY, August 4. 1891
12,931-Stewart vs. Sutherland-Ordered
respondent have twenty days to file brief
cause to be thereupon submitted.
13,539-LOWenbe berg VS.. Levine-Argued by
Eisner for appellant, Rankin for respondent
ordered appellant have five days 10 Tile reply
brief cause to be thereupon submitted.
13,546-Gavin VS.. Gavin-Argued by Crow
ley for respondent, Deuprey for appellant, and
submitted.
l4,2OO-In the matter of the estate of
Francis Croghan, deceased-Argued by Ma
l,,,,a
ent and submitted.
Is, 54T-Bronzan VS.. DrobaZ-By consent of
counsel, ordered appellant have thirty days to
file MS brief, respondent thirty days to reply
appellant thirty days to reply thereto, cause
to be thereupon submitted.
13,551-Ty1er ct al. VS.. Davis-Cause
ordered continued for term.
13,566-Clark VS.. Collier-CauSe ordered
continued for term.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
TUESDAY, August 4, 1891.
13,637-Beay VS.. Butler-Upon suggestion
to the court of the death of each of the defend
ants and respondents in above cause and it
appearing shat c. G.. Warren is the duly ap-
pointed and qualified administrator of the
estate of the said John Butler, and that
Arthur Inkersley is the duly appointed and
qualified special administrator of the estate of
said 2. II. Owens, on motion of w. s. Goodfel-
low, it is ordered that the said c. g. Warren
as such administrator, be substituted herein
for the said John Butler, and that the said
Arthur Inkersley, as such special admins
De substituted HSTtlll IOT the SIlQ H.
Owens, and that this action stand revived and
be continued against said substituted defend
ants and respondents.
13,5Y3-Langan VS.. Langan-Argued by
Matthews for appellant, Eyre for respondent
and submitted.
13,561-Newman VS.. City and County of
San francisco ct al.-Argued by Newman for
appellant, Herrin and Hittell for respondent.
Ordered appellant have five days to file brief,
cause to be thereupon submitted.
13,59O-Steen VS.. W1llIamSOn-Argued by
Payson for appellant, Dunno Tor respondent
and submitted.
Adjourned. SrEsE