The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1891-11-04
s1oU1Ls WIFE rHxzs AALLora
esns % tie Cases where voters hsA Din-
Guilty with the New Law.

ssUs % tie Casss wAere voters heA Nm.
Guilty with the New Law.
Judge Lawrence Of the Supreme court wal
busy yesterday Issuing peremptory writs Of
mandamus and orders to show cause why
mandamuses should not be issued In the
cases Of men whose votes election inspectors
In various districts had refused to receive
The Judge got down to the County Court
House at A. NJ. and he remained there until
4P M. County Clerk Giegerich was as long
In his ofilce. He placed his seal on every
paper issued BY Judge Lawrence.
During the day fourteen peremptory writs
were issued. About fifty orders to show cause
had such an effect on the election inspectors
that 1t was not necessary to issue peremptory
writs Each order bore big red seaL and as
none OF tho men who carried away the orders
came back for peremptory writ. It was taken
for granted that the election inspectors re-
ceived the votes they had refused.
These were the stories Of those who rot
peremptory writs:
Giuseppe Ancado failed TWICE to fold the
ballots In the polling place Of the Ninth Elec.
ton district Of the Third Assembly district,
and the inspectors refused to let him try Q
third time
Edward lube. who Is blind. didn't know he
could take any one Into the booth with him.
and he didn't fold the ballots properly In the
Ninth Election district OF the Third Assembl
have assistance, hut tho inspectors refused to
adHmai nd it the disability oath t. him.
get a, pastor. The inspectors. on lis return n
Daniel :; Sullivan. in the Fifteenth Election
to d his anS
va Inn t,nr ftfo
John 1. Walsh q g Charlton street for forty
tion district of the Fifth Assembly district In
Welsh; For that reason he was not registered.
eeetion sscias q The polling Sin e. place 70 % show
cause why he should not be registered. Yes
sSs q writ
SsSis n
it 20 him or to receive his vote.
IL shs
H. l. la II
papers. and because he couldn't produce them
tha sou S s o Sse ballot. in
the Seventh Election district Of the Second AS
s steGy dstss hs
but the In spectors said they didn't believe he
came under the disability clause
Bernard Curtis accidentally destroyed q
ballot In the Seventh Election district of the
Second Assembly district. His request for q
new set was refused.
Martin Hawley occupied more than ten min.
utes preparing his ballots in the polling place
Of tho Twenty-second Election district OF the
Assembly district. and more time
wa refused him. In his affidavit he said that
Will" he was preparing his ballots the other
booths were not occupied.
Richard Burke.i In icing paster on ballot
made an error.and the inspectors OF the Seventh
Election district Of the Second Assembly dis
trtct refused to give him another set OF ballots.
fective. in the First Election di strict E Of the
Fourth Assembly district applied for assist
Was refused.
Abraham sprinesteIn told the inspectors In
the Fourth Election district OF tho Third As
sembly district that he was disabled. but they
refused to administer the disability oath to
him.
John H. Branth. IN the polling place Of the
Nineteenth Election district Of the Seventeenth
Assembly district, was asked to show his
naturalization papers He told the Inspectors
that he had always voted on his fathers
papers. but they refused to- receive his vote.
Judge Lawrence refused to grant one april.
sation for a peremptory writ. 1t was from
Hugh Brady. who said that he registered In
he polling place OF the Fourteenth election
district, his residence being 5ll Pearl street.
which isn't In that election district No objeo-
ton was made to his registration. however.
informed Of the mistake that had been made, |
md IL Waa than too late t0 ractify IL