Fort Worth gazette. [volume] (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1891-1898, 1891-11-27

Inc following Is the setting OF jury civil
docket in the county court of Tarrant
county, Tex, November term, A d. 1891.
All continuances not noted in this list, were
entered oy agreement of parties.
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 1891.
BOOB. I. II. Stephens VS.. Fort Worth and
New Orleans Railway Company. =
1919. w. f. Lake vs.. City of Fort Worth
two continuances by plaintiff).
1855. William Slusher VS.. City of Fort
Worth.
4l55. Calvin slusher vs.. City of Fort
Worth.
1880 H. H Butler vs.. Fort Worth and
Denver City Railway Company,
TUESDAY. DECEMBER l, 1891
2y0l. J. l.. Edwards VS.. St. Louis, Ar
kansas and Texas Railway Company lone
continuance by defendant).
3ig7. +. Z. Schlageter VS.. Fort Worth
and Denver City Railway Company zone
continuance by defendant).
1916 Mayer & Olsen VS.. Texas Brewing
Company.
1913. Mrs. n Z. Dewitt vs. City of Fort
Worth.
1881. J. w Bolton VS.. Texas and Pacific
Railway Company.
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1891.
1915. Fort Worth Granite Roofing Co. VS..
Kiigore & Donaldson.
1910. Lucy Guiles VS.. North Side Street
Ry. Co. ct al zone continuance by defend
anti.
466. Friend & Armstrong VS.. B. C.
Wells zone continuance by defendant.)
4@59. Alice NJ Fell by next friends VS.. j..
3. Martin ct al.
1891. Armstrong & Messer VS.. Quanah
Hotel Co. Zone continuance by defendant.l
4+i2. Artesian Ice Co. vs.. I. {. Rushing
ct al
4447. David C. Adkisson vs.. Texas and
Pacific Ry.sCo.
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 8, 1891.
1864. Geo. +. kirkpatrick vs. Fort Worth
Land Co. Zone continuance by defendant.
1861. ThoS. NJ: Forbes VS.. Riverside
Street KY. Co.
44e5. John ". Tyner VS.. Texas aud Pa
citic Ry..Co.
. 4O7S. W. J. Boaz. VS.. J. S. Morris ct al.
FRIDAY, DECEMBER 4, 1891.
1926. Want & Co. vs.. North Side Street
Railway Company.
SOL. Ole Rossing VS.. Gulf, Colorado and
Santa Fe Railway Company two continu-
anccS by defendanU.
1850 Harry Stroll vs.. Gulf, Colorado and
Sa8ta fe Railway Company zone continu-
ance by defendant).
1892. Frank PrutZ VS.. 3. G.. Reich.
SATURDAY, DECEMBER ,. 1891.
1925 Samuel, Bryant VS.. Blake-Haywood
Company zone continuance by defendants,
and one continuance by plaintif).
4014. j. &. Sickles Saddlery Company VS..
Commercial Insurance Company of Califor-
MIA; .garnishee.
1872 H. J. Wilson vs. Gulf, Colorado and
Santa t,e Railway company Zone continu-
ance by defendanD.
4341. Dave Chesmore VS.. Riverside Street
Railway Company.
1865. Eugene Roche VS.. Gulf, Colorado
and Santa Fe Railway company zone con-
tinuance by defendanD.
MONDAY, DECEMBER Z, 1881.
3lS3. w. L. Chew VS.. North Side Street
Railway company.
3S5S. VIM. Bryant VS.. A. CantO zone con-
tinuance by defendant)
'4lS3. Albert p. Dixon vs.. Texas and Pa
cific Railway Company.
42i6. American Well Works VS.. Panhau-
die Machinery and Improvement company.
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 1891,
1854. J. B. Black VS. North Side Street
Railway company.
1862. r. r. Moore VS.. City of Fort Wortl5
(onG continuance by DEFENDANT
40J2. j. F. Day VS.. Gulf, Colorado and
Santa F'e Railway company lone contin-
uance by defendant)
4349 John +. Reed VS.. \. Il. GoUree Zone
continuance by defeudant)
1853 Fort Worth Marble Works VS.. p,
a Huffman Ell al.
449S. |. y. Stuart guardian, vs.. G. w.
Worrerl.
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 1891.
1928 Henry Gates vs.. Riverside Street
Railway Company ct al. zone continuance
by deferdanU.
3724 L. H. Stephens vs. Riverside Street
Railway Company ct al. Zone continuance
b. defendanu.
Alb. c. j. Shallenberger vs. Moss Collar
and Bagging Factory.
1873. J. J. Whalen VS.. Fort Worth and
Denver City Railway Company
THURSDAY. DECEMBER 10, 1891.
3i40. Champin & Standinger VS.. y. J. An
derson two continuances by defendantl.
1912. W. F. Cunningham VS.. Gulf, Colo
RADIO and Santa F'e Railway Company zone
continuance by defendant).
4l53. Fort Worth and Rio Grande Rail
way Company VS.. John S. Andrews ct a..
zone continuance by plaintiff).
4l99. Collins & Armstrong Company VS..
Hattie Hand.
4a1+. Eugene Roche vs. Fort Worth and
Denver City Railway Company.
CFRIDAY, DECEMBER II, 1891.
3639. p. I. Spann Us Gulf, Colorado and
Santa t'e Railway Company.
4O55. w. H. H. Wilson VS.. Texas and Pa
citic Railway Company, Zone continuance
by defendanD.
415l. W W. Scott vs. r. E. Maddox.
1929. Collins & Armstrong Company VS..
by defendanD.
431S. William r. Howard VS.. Texas and
PACING Railway Company.
SATURDAY, DECEMBER II, 1891.
S7S1. J. 3. Buchanan VS.. Pacific Ex-
press Company.
1918. II. G. Quarles VS.. A. Carlo Zone
continuance by plaintiff
sS4l37 NJ f. Wallen VS.. Arlington Heights
Street Railway Company.
Abs. Martin GoOden vs.. Arlington
Heights Street Railway Company.
4l46 s. II. Bromley VS.. Fort Worth
Packing Company.
MONDAY, DECEMBER IA, 1891.
1856. George white vs.. Fort Worth and
New Orleans Railway Company 1.-TWO con-
tinuauces by plaintiff).
3637 NJ. \. Payne VS.. North Side Street
Railway Company zone continuance by
PLAINTIFF.
4lt5. L. NJ. Douthitt VS.. TEXAS and Pa
citic Railway Company.
ALL. y. Skinner VS.. Texas and Pacific
Railway Company.
TUESDAY, DECEMBER Is, 1891.
1913. J. f. Fogg vs.. Dan Garyey Zone
continuance by defendant).
1869. Tiller Il Bell vs. A Pachman lone
co ntinuance by defendant).
1916. ". J. Boaz ct al VS.. John Page.
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER III. 1891.
1892. A. 2. Gething vs.. Gulf, Colorado
and Santa Fe Railway Company
1919. G.. Nance VS.. ". L. Conner
4l43. A E. Gething VS.. w. Il. Eastman.
THURSDAY, DECEMBER Il, 1891
1891 o. T. Lyon vs.. Francis II. Sparrow
ct al lone continuance by plaintif).
1925 Fannie L. Pitt ct al vs.. Max ElSer
ct al.
x1l7 T NJ Walker ranarar vs. ~