The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1891-02-22
ACKNOWLEDGMENT SUNDAY p

Niehssi Psiiifys 81 al-Mnssoa for drfAuif o.
defendant ball grar:e1-
gosn Icrs "a Mat a-are~sn e. as-Mosion 20
d:snaiss A. &c Collins. continued until February
-
cyrus r. Robinson va Matt J. Thompson
Order IL eefsutf OF defendant rlsc
Clarence z. EsEier vx Northern Pacific &
Psgss sunad saors Railway conpany-0rder OF
dismissal. rset
/ sfstson 4 Post MiIi Corapsny v. A T wIasor
2: 81. Foreclosure OF lien. set for March
gard. French & Co vs. n " carp ct si-Fore-
elasurs q; ten; set for FsoTus-f =.
Milton l. Barr vs.. Melody Caoir-SGs; on titis;
sez for March s.
Mary D. and y W Hsnkey Va David Eauf-
man et ai-Notsna to rnske complaint more
| definite and certain. denied.
IL &. silver e; al vs. III. w. Taft ct sl-pefauls
a. to Traeytea Mil Company granted.
John :. Blair vs. Tracytor Land Improvement
/ Company Motion 10 strike answes, granted
/ Istoaa Mil Coupsnv w. Jacob waii-De-
/ Eaarrer 10 complaint; overrased
STANLEY r. Thompson rs AnEon Lnmoer Com
| panT-pernurrer 70 complaint: waived ten DAYS
to sEsHer
| Bertha Iensnsen VI. Maple Leaf Lumber and
misunderstanding Company-Droppea from eslen-
| In the matter OF application of II. C. Raymond
for writ 81 cerslorsri IN case OF Peter Peterson
vs. u e. RayFno.ad- Dropped from calendar.
Cyrus T. Robinson - Mail J. ThoEapson-Dc-
/ fxuif ct defendant. fled
Gilman PARK Lnmhsr Company w. Hight d
SUPERIOR coUgr-Hgkxs. ].
| STATE of Washington vs. joseph wstkins-ne-
rnnfrer 70 information. filed set for February 3.
stats OF Washington vs.. Joha Considins-De-
ngrrer To Information; hied SCI Ior feus aAry y
stzte OF Washington rs. William I1ston-as-
SAINT with deadly weapon; bail reduced 20
| s50a. defendant admitted to bail
state of Washington Va Jesse Bean-Motion
| Tor arrest OF Judgment denied
William Hickman et al va. City OF Seattle
| Jury trial; verdict for plaintiff for tl,no
K Van Alstine vs. X. J. NJ, Quigey-jury
/ tris.. pending.
state OF Washington vs. George Watkins
Rape jury failing 20 agree were discharged
SUPERIOR cougT-cssoas.
lauren ingeis vs. +. L. stinson ct sl-Motion
for defxult filed.
Seattle & Montana Railway Company IS. H
] X. Hall et ai-Jgry return verdict for defendant
! for Soeoe Tor property taken and damaged.
/ kossline Amy Lewis VS.. Puget sound shore
| Railway Compsny-Hearing set for February -.
| Joseph Hayes woolen Company Va Puget
Sound shore Railway Company Defendants
motion for new trial. argued and submitted.
.oksnogan Live stock and Dressed Beef Com
| papy IS. coitreil & co.-Judgrnent for plaintiff
+ H. Neagle VS. Tracyton Mil Company and
George b. kittinger ProEnissory note; set for
| March ~.
J. : Copiey Va Robert Knipe-Damsges set
| for March Is
| John Mcdonald vs. B. n. Freed-To recover
| possession OF property; set for March ~
John sagmeiEter VS.. Charles Naher-Dsmages;
passed.
7. D. Mallory vs. D. X. BSxter-Services rem
defed set for March 10.
David ". phipps vs. Jennie |. Wheeler ct a.
-Eieetnent, set Tor April l.
Heiaenheimer 4 Luce vs.. Denneger & Batter
| Damages; set Tor March -
| Heidenheimer & Luce VS.. J. b. W hite-Attach-
| meGt. set for March -
| Bank Of British Columbia vs.. G. A. Stewart ct
| al.-PromisSory note; set for March "a
| A. Robafe Washington Central Improve
meni Company Damages; set Tor March 3.
| Nettie Brauer VS. John AcNeii-Damages; set
| for March p
| John NJ Dewey VS. p p Carol ct al-Ac-
| count for labor; set for March -
| Annie Kohne Risdon Calm Company-Ac-
count set for March 10
Charles Kramer VS. shoudy Rros-To recover
| possession OF property: set for March 4.
IN the matter OF condemnation Of real estate
/ for widening Front street-Motion of II. L. Yes
| leT for judgment on appraisers report; con-
| tinued.
In the matter OF condemnation Of real estate
| for widening Commercial street-Motion of II.
L. Yesler for judgment on appraisers report:
continued.
Journal Publishing Company VS.. Cascade Fire
and Marine Insurance tompany-De Defendants
motion for Judgment; passed.
Catharine ToelIner. executrix, vs.. Puget
sound shore Railway Company-Demurrer to
Daniel NJ Walters ct al. VS.. Pacific General
Mercantile, Auction and Commission Company
Motion TO vaeate Judgment; continued one
week.
D. ]. Fritz rs Puget Sound Shore Railway
| Company Motion for new trial; oyerruled.
pauy vs. Amos Goodell-Demurrer to complaint;
waived; five DAYS 10 answer.
Seattle Market VS. Tolt Logging Company
Demurrer 10 complaint; waived; five days to
First National Bank of Chicago vs. Harry
Herschberg Motion 10 strike reply; continued
| one week
Robert Knipe VS. f. A. Chisholm ct aide
murrer to defendants affirmative defense sus-
tanned.
Chicago Brewing Company VS.. John Cort-pe-
nlUrrer 70 COMPLAINT. oYerruled.
James Menavitt VS.. James Harris-Motion TO
strike complaint; sustained.
X. Mcdonald VS.. j. Observation-Disclosures to
complaint; overruled.
The Rosenfeld smith Company VS.. J. McQuaid
| Motion for new trial; passed.
James Dignan vs.. James sparr-Motion for
new trial; passed,
Richard 'Nevins, IT,. We. Alice s. Hin, execu-
Demurrer TO complaint: oyerruied.
John NJ. Bruce VS.. l. II. Griffith ct al.-MotioD
| for new trial; passed.
Thomas Johnson VS.. John Fl. MeGraw-Judg-
uent on default; entered.
Journal Publishing Company vs.. Cascade Fire
and Marine Insurance Compsny-iudgment for
defendant.
u ] Fritz VS. Puget Sound shore Railway
| company-M Motion for new trial; overruled
Peter Bartels, as administrator, Us. W. p.
| Scott Ell al.-Judgment for want of answer.
Jack Harper vs. Charles T. Russell ct al,-Mo-
| ton requiring copy OF contract overruled-
Nelson Swanson vs. Rainier Avenue Electric
Railway Company-Aotion for default; over
ruled
Miller Bros & Fletcher W. H. c. Raymond
Motion 20 vacate Judgment; granted.
" Chilberg vs. Jones q Rehabilitation for
default: denied.
o. 6. WyInan ct al. VS.. Jacob Rosenthal-Mo-
ton for default; granted.
Herman T. Hitler vs.. Claussen-Sweeney Brew
ing Communication 20 strike answer, denied
A. H. Selwyn VS. William Reichenecser ct al
/ Motion To set aside default denied.
". y. konalds0n vs.. otto boilln-pemurrer
| to complaint, everruled; FIVE days 10 answer.
Fremont Investment Compsny VS.. Albert NJ.
Gtiman-D Demurrer TO complaint waived; five
DAYS Ia suswer.
Daniel q. Mckay VS.. Charles e. Russell ct al.
Motion for new trial denied.