New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1891-10-31
TIE COURTS.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISIONS.

JUDGMENT OF THE LOWER COURT AFflrNhD ~
THREE ELEVATED RAILWAY CASES.
Ama,v oct 3O.-In the case OF Mary Lynch 10
e,opdent art the Third Avenue Railroad COmpahS'
oppeaut the Court Of Appeals. First DIVISION ua'
affirmed the Judgment OF the lower court WIN '"''
This was AN appeal from a judgment OF the ueherh
Term. First Department, affirming Judgment i'l
81 1913 10 in favor of the plaintiff. The acuoh was
brought 10 recover damages for injuries sustained "o
at,on,ntino IN hoard one of the companys cars at
,vninthst and Thlrd-ave. The injuries were caused
bv the sudden starting Of the car before the pahtn
was safely on board.
This court also affirmed the Judgment of the lower
court with costs in the case Of Philip W. "erhSn'
rosnondent agt the Suburban Rapid Transit Company,
appellant This an appeal from Judgment OF
the General Term First Department, affirming
Judgment in favor Of the plaintiff in an action brOuShS
to recover for injuries Sustained by the palnth wle
IN the employ of the defendant, working at station
at Third ave. and Observation-Disclosures on
October -, 1o5o.
The second Division Of the Court Of Appeals to-day
affirmed the Judgment in the case Of B. X. stevens
RESPONDENT agt tile New York Elevated Railroad Com
pany aud another, appellants. This was an appeal
from . judgment Of the General Term, First Depart
ment Affirming a Judgment in favor Of the plaintiff in
an action brought to restrain the maintenance and
operation of the elevated railroad in front Of the
premises 80. 134 rcarl-st, Ncw-York and to recover
Tor past damages.
The full list Of the decisions handed down by the
First Division is IS follows:
H.. &. schultz, respondent, agt. George W. Mead
Suburban Rapid Transit Company, appellant; Mary
Lynch, respondent, agt. the fhlrd Avenue Railroad
Company, appellant, NJ. a. BrOkman, respondent, ast
Lewis Myers. appellant; b. Metz, respondent, agt.
Edward Laclme'er ct all appellants; Gustav schnaler
and another, respondents, agt kOniad Schmidt and
another, appellants Jud gmcnt affirmed, with costs.
Gustav Schualer and another respondents, agt.
Konrad schmidt Afd another, appellants. Order
affirmed. with costs.
The following cases argued
Burr Mattico agi. Henry Wilcox, appellant
+. T. Miller AIT The city of Rochester, appellant.
\. y. WickS ct al, appellants, agt a. b. Thompson.
In the second Division the following decisions were
handed down.
samuel T. Merwin, appellant agt. a. J. Rogers, re-
Electrc smelling and Aluminium Company, appellants
l.. :. NOycs, appellant agt William Turnbul ct al.
respondents, y :. Lascclies ct al, respondents agt
John Miller, app liant; d. H. Lewis, respondent agt.
semOn Bachc ct al appellants; the same, respondent
at. Henry Cohen ct al, appellants, Is. X. Stevens
respondent AIT. the New YOrk Elevated Railroad Com
pany and another, appellants. Judgment affirmed,
with costs.
A. A BlIven, respondent, agt. Smith Lydecker ct al
appellants Order reversed and Judgment entered on
decision Of Special Term affirmed, with costs
The following argued
Rose y. iIanralan, appellant, agt. Manhattan Rail
road Company
7: ;. JeIkns agt. william e. Dean appellant
W. l. King ast. Morz Bauer appellant. Affirmed
by default.
Mary l. Morgan agt the New-York and Massa-
chuscttS Railway Company, appellant. Submitted.
Both divisions Of the Court of Appeals at the close
OF today's session took recess until November 80.