Los Angeles herald. [volume] (Los Angeles [Calif.]) 1890-1893, 1891-10-15
THE COURTS.


supreme oOurt-In Bank.
people VS. Flemiug-Argued and ordered sub
nIss lee vs. Hall-continued to Friday, 10TH
People VS.. swift-Appellant allowed twenty
days to file transcript.
People VS.. Lemperle : Ordered respondent
have until November Goth to file brief and
cause TO be Submitted thereon.
People VS. Burdick--Judgment affirmed;
People VS.. Delwood ct al.-Appellant allowed
five days to file BRIEF respondent twenty days
People VS.. Forester ct sl.-Continued to Sac
ramento November term.
Peopie VS.. Phelan-Argued Respondent al
lowed twenty days to fls brief Cause there
upon to be submitted.
People vs. Ahern-Submitted on briefs.
People VS.. Barry-Submitted on briefs
People VS.. Gosset-Submittedo on briefs.
People VS.. Bihby-Judgment affirmed.
People s.Cowgill-Continued to Sacramento
term.
People VS.. smalling- Ordered submitted upon
briefs.
People VS.. Ng Sam Chung and Woo Sing
Judgment affirmed.
People VS.. McNamara-Continued to Sacra-
People vs. Mesa-submitted upon briefs.
People us. First National Bank of San Diego
submitted upon briefs
Francisco VS.. Aguirre-0rdered submitted
upon briefs. Stipulated that Justice McFar-
land may participate in the decision of this
cause.
Superior Courts.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
Flasher VS. Waldron-Cause submitted
Estate of John Hobbs, deceased-Distribution
ordered.
DEPARTMENT THREE.
whigham VS.. Barclay ct al-Judgment for
Farmers and Merchants Bank VS. Council of
the City of Los Angeles-Defendant granted ten
days to answer.
DEPARTMENT FOUR.
Schieff1ein VS. Guirado ct al-Judgment for
plaintiff, $l2,335, aud attorneys fees, $3.50.
E. Schiefflein VS.. j. Schieffiein ct al-Judg-
ment for plaintiff, $4,000, and attorneys fees,
d. w. Field VS.. A. s. Shorb ct al-On trial.
DEPARTMENT FIVE.
Northam VS.. Morrison ct al, demurrer over
ruled.
Land, Reservoir and Power Company VS.. Car
from plaintiff.
Page VS. Northumberland.
In re habeas corpus James Lacy-Continued
Glencross VS.. Acknowledgment signed.
DEPARTMENT SIX.
Sterling VS.. Smith-Motion to vacate judg
ment denied.
People VS.. frankie Lee Claire alias Lille
Bailey, grand larceny-On trial.
NEW CASES FILED.
VIM. Smith VS.. Southern Pacific Company
Suit for $40, 600 damages.
A. L. Russell VS. A. Mecartne y-suit to quiet
title to lot IA of the Grove Orchard tract.
Mary e. Haynes vs.. J. W. Hayerstick-Suit
for 1920 due on sale of property.
Today's Calendar.
SUPREME CURT.
California Southern Hotel Company VS.. C. R.
Calender.
In re estate of Groome VS. Almstead.
First National Bans, San Luis 0bispo VS..
Bruce ct al.
Cert vs. Pfeging.
Cross VS.. Reed.
Oaks VS.. Oaks
Sichler VS.. Look ct al. two cases.
Mosgrove VS.. Harris
Campbell ex'r. VS.. West ct al
Yost, assignee, VS.. the Commercial Bank of
Santa Ana.
SUPERIOR COURT-DEPARTMENT ONE.
People VS.. All Sing-PeTJury.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
Estate of Frank P Noble, Observation-Disclosures
Estate and guardianship of the Bixby minors
Account.
Estate Of Hester A. Dillon, deceased-Ac-
count and distribution.
Estate of o. w. Childs, deceased-Account.
Alexander VS.. Richards ct al.
DEPARTMENT THREE.
Mascarel vs. Clinton
DEPARTMENT FOUR.
Yates vs. Semi -Tropic Land and Water Com
pany.
DEPARTMENT FIVE.
Slauson VS. King.
Habeas corpus James Lacy.
DEPARTMENT SIX.