New Ulm weekly review. [volume] (New Ulm, Minn.) 1878-1892, 1891-03-04
YOU CAN TAKE YOUR PICK.
Many Good Names Suggested For
Aldermanic Honors.
Expressions of Preference That
Show No Lack of Timber.


election, the following brief interviews
| with a number our citizens as to their
choice for alderman in their respective
! wards will show who stands most in ia
! vor, and may lead to the selection of
mon who have not heretofore been
mentioned in this connection. The ques-
ton propounded in every case was,
"Who is your candidate for alderman"
The answers received were as follows:
FIRST WARD.
Peter Scherer: I am for Roos in pre-
ference to all others. 80.
b. Weyhe: Politics aside, am for
either Roos or Herman Nagel.
Richard Pfeferle: Albert Behnke
would make first-class alderman.
G. A. Ottomeyer: 1 want the first
ward to be represented by G. W. A.
Krook.
John Larson: I have always consid.
cred G. H. Hornburg a fit man for such
place.
VIM. Brust: Give Roos another
chance. 1t would be hard to improve
upon him.
G. w. Krook: I am satisfied with
Roos. He can take another term just
as we'll as not.
Henry Crone: Roos, if he will take it.
If not then | would like to see &. w. A.
Krook elected.
A. Blanchard: Haven't any choice.
If Engel lived in the First ward, 1
would be for Engel.
A. w. Bingham: MY first choice is
Roos. My second choice is Roos. I
want to see him elected.
w. F. Setter: would say A. w.
Bingham, if I thought he would take it.
G. w. Krook would also be good
man tor such place.
Jacob Hottinger: If Roos caEnot be
induced to run again, give US Scherer.
He is progressive, and would make a
rattling good alderman.
G. w. H. Heideman: Georse Schm
would be good man. His head is level
on water-works on parks,and in fact on
everything. Boom Schmidt.
j. Newhart: Take Koos again if ne
will consent to accept. After Roos, my
choice would be G. H. Horn bnrg, as the
most active man we could select.
Gottlieb Schmidt: | think it is time
that our section of town should have a
representative in the council. We will
endeavor to elect H. G. Kiesling.
Werner Boesch: I have thought the
matter over some and am of the opinion
that Roos ought to be urged to serve
again. After Roos, would favor
George Schmidt.
G. H. Hornburg: 1t makes but little
difference to me. Roos has made re-
markably good member, but if he will
not serve again, I think we will do web
to elect Doehne. .s... -
Albert Behnke: Leave the council as
it is If I was twenty years younger
I might feel like running myself lin or.
der to stir things up a little, but, as it is,
am old and satisfied.
DR.. C.Weschcke: What is the matter
with Roos Charles is hustler and
has shown that he is not afraid to say
no, when all the rest say yes.j 1t is such
able young fellows that we deed in the
council. ~.. +.
Chas, Silverson: 1 am not interested
to any great extent in city politics. but
for myself I think George Doehne
ought to be elected from THE first ward
He is not afraid to express This opinion
on all questions, and has good qualif-
cations for useful member.
SECOND WARP.
H. H. Beussman: Why not keep
Stuebe..
DR.. j. L. Schoch: StricAi Her is my can
didate.
G. +. Ruemke: George Boock would
be my chOlce.
DR.. Fritsche: just as SOON have stue-
be as anybody.
G. schapekahm: You ban put me
down for Schubert.
Albert !. Setter: ! ami for Chas.
Stuebe. He is as good as any Of them.
DR.. G. Hirsch: + stricklers can be in
duced to accept, I am in fator Of his
selection.
F. b Behnke: How would Jacob
Klossner strike you? Seems "a me he
would be a good one.
T. Crone Jr.: Haven't though Of the,
matter much. Either Striekld or
Stuebe would suit me-
w. Eibner: would like to see pr.
sStrickler as alderman from our wart
He Believes in improvements, and pres