New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1890-02-03
ss45,325
5,707 ,1S0
20, 41s.e7s
s1.6s5,3i7
so7.74o,542
$50, 03e
17,703.1oe
h.nts mt included IN the
s67.74o,542
Cireustion Of National gold banks not included In th
above, s14S,T17. -
U. S. REGISTERED BONDS ON DEPOSIT

Totals .. s142 266, $50 s35,725,0O
The United States Treasurer last week received
from customs $5,3S7,253, from lh'ernat &c
81 $50, 4s4 and from miscellaneous soulocS g. ~
els total from all IS, 1885, against S'26o,ISl
for the preceding week. During the week the
Treasury purchased $405,400 bonds; Sl5,OOO
per cents at I24 and 1858, 400 l-2 per cents al
104 5-S.
BANK CONDITIONS COMPARED.
Rvstbe operations of the New-York Sub-Treas-
urv in the week ended last Friday evening, which
included the receipt OF Sl33 OOo lor eAcISnee oh
other Sub-Treasures and the payment Oh idI22,,
l64 for purchased bonds, the New-1ork banks
lost 81 577, 2IO cash Yesterdays bank statement
of the weeks averages is mystery. Inc ol iei
Nationals figures, which last week were lhc5.udeu'
and were as follows loans 81 ,0OO caShS
900: deposits SO, 21 1000, and circulation SloOI-
0O0 are omitted from the statement Yet win
the Sixth National out the statement reports an
increase of SO 9SS,300 in loans, an increase OF
$5,211 200 in deposits, and an increase OF $685.
500 cash. Adding To these changes the last week
figures of the Sixth National gives an increase IN
loans of $5,SOO,000, in deposits of S1,30O,OOO,
and in cash of 81 ,054, 500. But from the GER
tainty that the previous weeks statement was
made upon rising averages and the known interior
movements of money during the last week, theTe
was reason to expect an increase OF S5,OVo'oVo
in cash, instead of 81 ,054,60O. We do not at
tempt to explain the mystery till we have iur-
ther light. The Clearing House informs us there
is error in the statement, which results IN
decline of 1853, 200 in the surplus reserve, ana
leaves it at S14,26S,450 against SlS,ssS,l13
February ,, 1889, S22,304, 40 FEBRUARY 4, 1907
and S2O,471, $50 February 3, 1887.
The changes for the corresponding week OF pre-
cedng years were as follows: 1SS0-loans increase
81, 0sS 90, cash increase S5S2,700, deposits in
crease S6,817, 1900, and surplus reserve decrease
S1,121 ,625; 1S6s-oans increase Sc, 600, cash
increase $9s9,0OO, deposits increase $6,615,s0O,
and surplus reserve decrease 1864 $50; 1857
loans increase S6134, 900, cash decrease $500,
deposits increase S5,672,800 and surplus reserve
decrease 81 1926, 700 So the changes Of last week,
although seeming to be ineXpcable, are found to
have been of the same character as the changes in
the same week of the preceding three years.
Subjoined is yesterdays statement. compared
with the corresponding pates of 1889 and 1885,
Feb 4, 49, Feb 2, $50. Feb !. 90.
Loans 1852 $50 700 S399,910 0e0 si0 272000
Specie ss4,d2S900 $500 900 90eS9 2o Co
Legal-tenders 3i,3s6S00 37i731O0 81 300 400
Deposits 3s4 $4,000 4SlI42 loo 29Is5G0o
Circulation 1,Ol4,7OO 4,7Oo1OO 333I1OO
following shows the relation between the total re-
serve and the total deposits at the respective dates
Syecic ........ Si,423t 500 $780, 600 9O056, 200
Total sis $40 700 sl2o $751; sl2l sos COO
Reserve required $500 - - - 49,. - 49,.
Surplus ...... So, 5o4775 s1s,s9s175 s1i,2os, $50
Per cent of deposits 3O.96 2e3S 1882
The following is Saturdays statement in detail