New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1890-12-11

Henry Glow. tlle banker was tho principal witness
I'm ,ut tried vc-tcrlay bcfor, chief Judge Daily and
a iury TN "a" Court ~ Common Plea. in which Cevs
d, TO- ere The plaintiffs ,-aiu't John b Alley upon
a promi,-ory u1te for $1,000. The note made by
G.or.e y. Roberts, and was dated Msrch =. 1-9j.
~ C!cN- te.ircl that Mr.. Alley came into his Office
ON the day the note va, dated. and asked Mr.. CeW 3
to cash IL. Mr Alcy ,aid that he did not want 10
dor-c IT, but sad that De would pay 1t if Roberts did
bot. When the note become due lIr. Ce1s declared
that nc Informed Mr. Ancy that Nr. Roberts had not
pad it. bu, Nr. Alley did not come forward with the
money. The case W. closed Yesterday as far a. tho
testimony WAS concerned. and the counsel will sum up
TODAY. Abbott Brothers appeared for Cle"a a. Co.
ap1 colonel inccr-pll for tl" defendant.
Francis !. bridges promised 70 buy piece Of
c,ty property nom James Falvey, but when tho day
q, ,or1pctc the purchase came around lie refused tn
tlAc the property, upon Tire ground that COCA u'o
could not be conveyed by Falyey This alleged de-
1t IN title Was an allegation that the title originally
cam. from the English setter, Instead II tie Dutch
ralycy brought suit to compel Bridges 10 carry Out
,. ,,rt II the contract The case was tried before
Iud.c Beach, and be handed down an opinion yester
day. holding that the English title va' good MnoAA'
lli,h and WoYGford appeared for the phnuf.
Nj, Ilk,.e + Cowcn occurred verdict for 5000
from jury. before Judge Gieericb. in The CITY
Court Yesterday AGAINST Gcorsc ". We'll for breach
of promise 81 marriage. We'll was special delivery
messenger IN tn pu-tos,r when he hrst became dc'
u.,utcI with Mis- Cowcu. Finally he passed
the Clvil service examination, AMI va' ap
pointed - postal clcrl, with salary II 5000 year.
Their wedding day hN~i for date IN JUN
l--0 Before the wedding day had arrived Wei
met a Young woman who owned frame house at NO
1913 East one hundred ard tlirtccnthst 4. Wen then
jltod Ms, Cowcn and married the crl with the frame
house. Mis-, Cowcu sued for $4,000.
The suit Of Margaret fitzpatrick lcnn'y against
the heir, of Thomas {. Icnnl>y, 70 set aside the
annulmcnt of the marriage Il the plaintiff 10 Thomas
g. IIcnnl,v has been compromised. and the planuf
allowed II 10 - hy default before Judge lusraham IN
the supreme Court Yesterday. Margaret Fitzpatrick
VA, married Ia Thoma, G.. licnusy m l-1i and they
lived to,rther untII l~15, when decree MAs entered
100 the nuprrIc Court auuulug the marriage, upon
the lround that MIR. llcuui~y hal a husband living
when Ilcnui,N married mr.. llcnul~y then went Ia
Cauldl and married again. After his death the nr,t
Wiir began 4 suit 10 haze the auuu,inett declared
void upon IN" ground TINT procured by fraud.
Charlie, MaYbaum married Miss Dora Levy. said To
a-o N,, Hannah Huehm declares that MAY Baum
4 -ult in the supreme Court e. recover $4,000 for
breach Of promise of marriage. Mavhtum Wa arrested
b, au oS,r OF Justice Andrews aud required To giva
i.tl for =. Ouu Mas, luttu -HN> 100 hcr complaint
prepared ly her counsel samuel ID. Levy. That her
wedding dpy va, fixed fpr Jdy - lat. Before the
wedding day hc wrGt' her letter IN Which hr broke
the caca-curut. Afcr Mis-. Boohm learned thai May
uuu lad married Ms Lcvy she brought tie present