The Sedalia weekly bazoo. [volume] (Sedalia, Mo.) 187?-1904, 1890-01-14

nishee discharged.
Same vs. Hopkins same entry.
Same VS.. Bently ; same entry.
Same VS.. Windsor SINE entry.
Same VS.. Henry; same entry.
Wyrick VS.. Ream ct al defend
ants file answer.
City of Sedalia vs.. Jaggles defend.
ant files notice of appeal.
Weir Plow Co., VS.. Blocber, ct al. |;
defendants file answer.
Devereaux ct al. VS.. Gee ct al;
defendant Coe files separate answer.
Times ct al. VS.. Wallace ct al ; de-
PENDANTS file answer.
Walter A. Wood Co. We. Smith
ct al. /: defendants file answer.
Emerson, Hughes & Go. VS.. Jno.
Montgomery. garnIshee of John Pat
ton plaintiff files interrogatories.
Hull VS.. Hull defendant files an
swer.
Taylor VS.. Smith; defendant files
answer and parties files stipulations.
Brown vs. Tuck; appellant files no.
tice of appeal.
Alexander VS.. Clop'on, garnishee
of Hubbard; plaintiff files interroga.
tories to garnishee.
Democrat Publishing Co. VS.. l.. G.
Glessner; motion for new trial and
motion in arrest overruled.
Carter VS.. Carter, divorce; contin-
ued.
Slower VS.. Slower, divorce; contin-
ued.
Schmidt VS.. Schmidt, divorce dis
missed.
Taylor VS.. Taylor, divorce; dis.
missed.
Hill VS.. Hill, divorce; defendant
has till 11th to file amended answer.
White VS.. University Land c.. /;
plaintiff files amended petiion.
Lullman VS.. LullmaD, divorce;
dismissed.
Hull vs.. Hull, divorce; defendant
files answer.
Prewitt VS.. NJ, K. & I. railroad
company; defendant fl es answer.
Clair VS. Missouri Pacific railway
company; defendant flies answer and
motion for costs.
Durrill VS.. Third National bank;
deiendent files answer.
Building and Loan association VS..
Morris. defendant files answer.
Jacob Schmidt VS.. A. s. B AIDES ct
al; petition filed and writs ordered
issued.
L. U. Ruckle VS.. same; same entry.
Exparte, application of Fred Fich-
ter to leave case of Msdaline FIGHTER
VS. ID. Jak; cause redocketed for entry
nunc pro tune.
Galbreath VS.. Newton; motion to be
relieved from stipulation argued and
taken under advisement.
Smith VS.. Missouri Pacific Railway
company, damages continued on
-l.-----S~.ssh~f-tr Jamc, damages !;
same entry.
Zimmerchied VS.. Missouri Pacific
Railway company, garnishee dis
missed.
Schaffer VS.. Kabrs, settled and dis
missed.
Reid Murdoch & Co., VS.. Townsley.
attachment l.. M. TowDsley files
separate answer.
Seeberger ct al VS. same, same en-
try
Keickleffer ct al VS. same, same en-.
try.
Brigham ct al VS. same, same entry.
O'Neal road case, appellant files
motion to dismiss proceedings.
Hubbard VS. Hubbard, continued.
Ream vs. Wyrick, defendant files
answer.
Drake VS. Jaynes, judgment for
plaintiff for s173.5O, 6per cent in
crest.
Emerson, Hughes & Co. VS. Z. J.
smith garnishee of John Patton,
;ause dismissed and garnishee dis
Emerson, Hughes 81 Co. VS. Will
,erson garnishee same, same entry.
Weller VS.. Shobe; acct. Judgment
or plaintiff for 1928 6 percent inter-
ST.
French VS.. French; divorce. Proof
f publication filed.
The following cases were disposed
f Yesterday.
Michael Smith VS.. Farnham; cause
lken up, jury waived and partly /,
card.
John r. Clopton, administrator VS..
w, Truxel; defendant flies motion
compel plaintiff to make petition d
lore definite and certain. v
John Hohimer VS.. German motion q
II costs filed. \
o. B. Zennis vs.. Wallace; defend :,
1t files motion to dismiss; plaintiff
cy,uan fsI1 Gl~ /