Baxter Springs news. [volume] (Baxter Springs, Kan.) 1882-1919, 1890-12-20
SINGLE TAX DEPARTMENT.
TAXING LAND VALUES.

| lilCVTY OtOIEt III ~
A very common objection to the prop
osition To concentrate all taxes on land
values Is that tho land owner would add
the increased tax on the value OF fis
land 10 tho rent that must he paid by
his tenants. 1t Is this notion that In
creased taxation of land values would
fall upon tho users, not upon tho owners
| of the land, that more perhaps than any
thing else prevents men from seeing the
far-reaching and beneflcent effects oil
doing away with tho taxes that now
fall upon labor or the products OF labor
and taking for public use those values
which attach to land by reason OF the
growth and progress Of society.
The taxes levied upon land values, or,
to use tho politico-economic term, taxes
levied upon rent, do not fall upon the
user Of land, and can not be transferred
by the landlord to the tenant, is con-
ceded by all economists Of reputation.
However much they may dispute as to
other things, there is no dispute upon
this point. Whatever flimsy reasons
any of them may have deemed 1t OK
pedicnt to give why the tax on rent
should not be more resorted to, they all
admit that the taxation of rent merely
diminishes the profits Of the land owner,
can not be shifted on the user OF land,
can not add to prices, or check produc-
ton. Not to multiply authorities, 1t
will BIO sufficient to quote John Stuart
Mill. lie says lsection 2, chapter 8,
book 8, principles OF Political Econ
omy'):
A tax on rent falls wholly on the land
lord. There arc no means by which he
can shift tho burden upon any one else.
1t does not affect the value or price Of
agricultural produce, for this Is deter
mined by the cost OF production in the
most unfavorable circumstances, and in
those circumstances, as we have so often
demonstrated, no rent is paid. A tax
on rent, therefore, has no effect other
than its obvious one. 1t merely takes
30 much from the landlord and transfers
1t to the State.
The reason of this will be clear to
every one who has grasped the accepted
theory of rent-that theory to which
the namc of Ricardo has been given,
and which, as John Stuart Mill says,
has but to be understood to be proved.
And IL will be clear to every one who
will consider q moment, even II he has
never before thought of the cause and
nature OF rent. The rent of land repre-
sents return to ownership over and
above the return which Is sufficient to
induce use-it is premium paid for
permission to use. To take, in
taxation, part or tho whole Of this
premium, in no way affects the in
centive to use or the return to use; in no
way, diminishes the amount of land
there is to use, or makes it moro diff
cult to obtain 1t for use. Thus there Is
no way in which tax upon rent or land
values can be transferred to the user.
Whatever the State may demand OF this
premium simply diminishes the net
amount which ownership can get for its
use, or the price which it can demand as
purchase money, which is. Of course,
rent, or the expectation OF rent, capital
lied.
Here, for instance. is a piece Of land
that has value-let it be where 1t may.
Its rent, or value, is the highest price
that any one will give for tit is
premium which tho man who wants to
use the land must pay to the man who
owns the land for permission to
use it. Now, II tax be levied
on that rent or value, this in no
wise adds TO the willingness of any one
to pay more for the land than
before; nor does 1t in any way add to the
ability OF the owner to demand more.
To suppose, in fact, that such o tax
could be thrown by land owners upon
tenants, is to suppose that the owners Of
land do not now get for their land all 1t
will bring, is to suppose that, simply
whenever they want to. they can put up
prices as they please.
This is, Of course, absurd. There
would be no limit whatever to prices,
did the fixing Of them rest entirely with
the seller. To the price which will be
given and received for anything. two
wants or wills must concur-the want
or will of the buyer. and the want or
will Of the seller. The one wants to
give as little as he can, the other to get
rs much as he can, and the point at
which the exchange will take place is
the point where these two desires come
to balance or effect q compromise. In
other words, price is determined by the
equation Of supply and demand. And,
evidently, taxation can not affect price
unless 1t affects the relative power Of one
or the other Of the elements Of this equa-
ton. The mere wish Of the seller TOT get
more. the mere desire Of the buyer to
pay less, can neither raise nor lower
prices. Nothing will lower prices I'M
less it either increases supply or de-
creases demand. Now, the taxation of
land values, which is simply the taking
bV the State of q part of the premium