New-York tribune., 1890-05-21

/
pound additional All sugars above No. IL ID. D IN
color shall bc classified by the d. s. OF color ana pay
duty as follows All sugar above NO l3 and not ABOVE
No rs d. : / 7o10O cents per pound All sugar
| above No. 10 and not above No; 20 ID: s., V9-loo
cent, per pound. All sugars above no. ~ toyc ~,
10 100 cents per pound. Moasses testing not above
my SIX & d'e, @ Su 1S the Moasses tSng above dftysx
degrees shall pay duty OF cents per gallon. -
Mr. McKena ,ad that MS amendae9i m ahdma a'S "a per
cent. II retained the dividing hne at l3 nsea" the ~
IL and secured to he reT n ena 4 H. tH WSch G9I the pend
inc bill unpatriotcaly cent to foreign rehnerS "a
conlra,cd with the Mi D With 'G hs present b H
M, not a case Of lowering or Increasing rates, Dut ~
m ali partcnlar, except the sugar schedule brave
and strong In the sugar schedule 1t was tInd. ~
na tnG o1gr 1pce IGeu in the s"ear schedule the bl re
fused To- one industry the Republican principle Inc
It 1a VA, sarg1de by h bin Ey PIT, putting ng.sm s%Sas
the list the committee struck LA LA eNS =, he
iTc ON Rcp|6lican principles. Think of future
Democratic Congresses quoting kepnDnoan ooc,3vc cGr
prncpcs sugar cheaper in the United Sln,et The
! than IN any country in The world saw p'c, h ,rnds
! conntrv wa, Engand-he had almost sald frrctratns
England. but he rcfained Thing WcfS m1 TaS
sOncW hat, and m this debate Enalahu p e@apo Vas
.ct before the House and Englands cneaPhcss VIZ a.
inE ,tion Of England and the Golden club The
Committ"r ON Way- and Means had made mistake
when 1t had di~crlminatcd against suFaa' ., amend.
Mr. G caan2 Gi , l@4' wat he !" teTcd the faacions
m".itjon ialcn hv Mr. McKenna What vas tle
position Of the Ecp"isa Pa fra'S duty those articles
Of foreign production. except luNureS' ,. INC ,gar ,
Mngn 'p nrnsurt Which c"nd not be produced in TIE
I'ped tiatcs in sufficient quantities to supply tnr tne
home market eol la ado Go6 Ee3r si. oo50o0 Of this
comins free from the sandwich Islands the the
%uH Ilmnod tt,tc, VA, onecIchth Of the consumption
Loss sugar was produced IN unl, c"u"S 3 ths other
produced thirty years Gentlemen Oh the ,, o''lrp m
idc were consistent when they stood by thc du,S on ~
sugar. because II was any ior ncra,ic marty
harmony with the policy Of the Denlorralo pahS phSr
| Tbe .cntlcnan from california was not happy VIII I'LL
he ,ad That wool stood on all four, WIN husr, , i
| oricrt tarir, was 30 100000 pounds and the I'm
ports i.OoOoOOo Twicc a. mnch was p, pr"npoeu as a
| home A. va, imported. and the home p,S'rcc c,isae
nHccn 70 control the price al home me ana reEma,e nnah
the world price ~ wool hccamee ,h me- y.veHnc .rh
m IN the prt.cty" y,tcm and placing sugar gar on itS ttS
! Ii' ~ Ii,.' I',Il. and declared that few men Ia
C,l,for,', q'rollci the production Of ,ggar IN uat
.-i,,.' oo o., re- four mon ~ California who owned
fhe .u.,- plantations Of the sandwich Islands. ..
i'', , ,hr bill a, being injurious 10 the interests
Of fh. c,l,rci lahorcr Of the >9nth. ~ 49,. hoooo.
,lr stewart. oi vermont, thought tha, ur pcnot' M
of ~ bounty. ID applied to sugar at ALL should be eN'
tcnGed +" n3p. - "(Eablasa called attention to the
- ,,,',,i,;,,~r, oi the Government and TO tf
nc',.,ts ~ dous Justice ~ the eN soldiers, anu S
r,iI.. -Ii-,r ir.c aad paying = bounty upon '9 H.
| du,t.ou. Why NOT give uolu'' @ @Hn 'n.n. ,.. ,bse
| .if
,,,.r,tu.li to reduce the ,unr duties 20 per cent
Iu, b. v,G not prs, that, prferrinI 70 STANG WIN
"'v ,ar-.or. ~ Wc,t virginia. argued that. from
cou- ''a' hcpn Lean ana prof. on SoId r..
r,.t. iHc -r.a',-' rr,t-'ron ana tiit wa" I'c ''''
| 'v- ,.i..,.-. ~ Louisiana. wished sugar 70 b.
| stricken lpu the FREQ l,t The people :" hT al,
ulr l,l been 'oM tat tho election o' a., hcPn".'an a.
,.,.f ft thr ',ovorum"nt hst 'car on .nGar Wa, Wa,
| ..t,upp... n .u-lr were placed on tAe free l,'
-. production If i''"'n '"tilI'', M''," ." nd ,roo
.t.d ,ul I,~.-n sugar w1nld have an open ana lr,e
,.,n i.- ihnn Il 10 protect The uear
.,t..tr.. Thr cultivate" u sugar "!- 'nt'.od ~
..,..t.. l. ,-r.r o. fnc cultivation oi wool "r Tax
90. ......' ...fi ruf abolish 10" fif Dn sugar
,.. ...... .f.. p..I, d.ht ~ t'e .1u" un".
VI N-'r - 'al,.rg.i. E.,,, '' "'' an o
..t o. t.. o. .,- ito on'. ~ tim't" method ot ur
f,.. d. further t,i.o. th.i th, tevcnue of 50.
! nYl..0 ie-t.d from sugar was necessary :" MOI
| t'. .I -a-D Dr. - the Governments lic showed! rom
| ta" r'rr of 'h, .'' '!n. ri II & ,'' II oo5 COO nat
| m. Average arnuH .1-pu, "Ncintns ne rcqgnir9'
mont. .f 'hr .Ghrs fund. Vae. h"N'V"r' ""'n' 80
,. ,tn f.i fnr u-,ti sion placing sugar on INC ire
! r.. .suim lnluii fop tnc Treasury s33oo'ooC OF
,o.,.,,.. and r.uu take from c" Trca'uTy for tnr
'ucr fom zane. ncef-. and s"relmm S'iso%~; ,sr,;
m,iH- torl f'iH'u, - oi so3,vo."yE, w. Ee hecn In
creased r con dcrCd IN ne ,%o ,b,, h@"t, vps m
,,., IT,. f. r.,cnur from sugar conld not he sAprcn
~, ,,. .r,. oi NsNland. myorc,i fr:. sugar snd
! l., v,..,,.,r.e,,. Who cont~udcd that II was impo,
.iI. FL, prr.Io. sugar ia L!ui-ana {" compete with
~, l.,r.,n. ~ Indiana. opposed 10 the grani.
ing 81 lourtc- on any article nroau'e ~ "" la
| ,la n... fIc difference between the Conimupl,t Wl
,U ,,..,i.,.r, ou way. and Means was that thr i"r
,nd , l,f..- wanted 10 tale from the poor ana give
| ~ fhc r.r. Dcm"-r'tr applause ,A tho .rror
| Hr uurnri, - Minnesota. supp"r'H ''o '"N''
Nr n,'Inrd,e = Kentucky; >oid mat Inc '"It
r,ft, Al ltUt
,,, l,a,-, ,ll. distributed over the whole country
80 M po- thc taL wa, nlr' 81, 'i. ,axe eU wcrc
dyI. iut. 30 ir a- could be good II was inc D'''
o. Lnrri hlr, IN his own district II had incr"a yea
| within 70 f.n years from 100000" I" l7''''''''
Mr. VcEnlr, cl1.cl the d-cu',on Win an ariW rilI
me ..,,.., an, ,.n ti.. other -.dc had said that when
n. u-nl,,..'. came u'p the majority they "1uM. would r.
f,-.n- thf thc committee had provided that me ap
| preparation fr the payment of boun'"' >h'"'' wv ."
T1, N,Fcnna amendment ves rejected
w. ~'..ari. Of vermont. offered an an,n%,n nn
Mr. rrrl.ngisc of Kentucky. moved to o.. rcHn,e ,nn,
the duy hcwn. drc,,"d or polished Ionrncnf al
fnr- -iud-.uc other building or IN monu"',r 9 f,n N
Stone csccp marble not oihcrwise PcccG PclGcG eo5rs
go 20 20 per c',i al ya,oren' ,nners,n Of Iowa
| caldwell Burton. Dorsey and BAKER F"''" ]" '''
'''' nr motion Of Nr Mckinley amendments were
adopted reducing from II T. II cent. per 'ln,S ,,o
the duty on manufactured or unNrrN'cd H''Nlp.'i
-r,rf,c sand -iuur other building or monument ,
-t,n,. except marble NOT otherwise provided lor ahI
,r.r, lD 10 to per cent heWu. dresser or p"i''"
tone of the same character. am amendment uNlnE
the duty On ~Vcctcu"d chocolate NJ ) GEMS u Ponu"
am amendment changing the duty on 't'cl ulg"t' ''
! valued above lG cents pound, rom - per ,cn'
nd voorom To cent, pound, and one liking duy
of /, per cent lh vaorrm on white paper i"I
rhoio.rapncrs. placing on the free list hsh ths
ir..i.i.t If American fisheries and fresh or frozen
| u-h euglit I'm fresh waters except salmon
| Mr. Mckinley also offered amendment nNlnG
th dnfv ON ehotcuns valued at no more than ST. al
q, per cent valued ai more than Sl2 80 per ccnt
| ui.tn. and revolving pistols, - per cent.
| The House was in great deal ~ confusion, ami'
which The chair put the question on the amendment
| ard declared o. carried. Nut VT. WALKER, ot Ma,s !
chu.ctt. was loud I'm his claims that he was entitled
io the nopr having addrcs,ed the char for rccoEn
| ,iou I'M order to oppose the amendment. Mr. Ne
Eiulcv a. consent that Mr.. WALKER be allowed Ia
| nrocrcd hui Nr. WALKER declined to hc heard on
| any man permission lie Nould De hcarn on h''
| own right or not AT all.
| The chairman saving that there was no occasion
for any frclua. recognized Mr.. Waller who said