New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1890-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS DECISIONS.
LARGE NUMBER HANDED DOWN N EACH


RESPONDENTS ait Parker T. Nhtcomb appellant WIZ
tam Butler. respondent AT. the Gi.n Fan lali
appellants, agt Isaac Y. prokaw, respondent IRA j..
CGiti, appellant. AIT. Manning :. Crane respondent
and Others rcspoldeni. Eusenia Gclrhc respondent,
at Mary HAYES. appellant ilc'r Is imam, ap
Mott Schcferlorn re- puadcn AIT. the CITY OF Schr-
ncctad>, appellant simon hlnauh q =" api Na'h''
Browncll and others. AuM CRAWFORD. W-p""u'Al. az"
The DehWare end LachaN wanna h'iit"u '."p'nt
appellant Ham T. Weave. r., noarn' Az Ausnsta
M "i1n "l'i.r, '!' I''. .n,'v, Na,. Iovart
: respondent AIT. the Broadway and seventh Avenue
a .,d COMPANY; %pp'"a ,icor:c Mnn
ger. rrspond.ii Jonas " IAN. res
tieph6n A. Wcs, r,,p5ndcn agt the Manhattan liai
wy Company. appsan.; i0,a - u T'., rfvnei,
Company. appellant ms .An.rea" surely company ll.,
r-lrnael act T. T. i!lrr sPpcl,ani; Evr@n
rrih"T~. respondents, agt Tie Cai'ornln ni"'"M,e
Meyer 4. Bc.nAonicr respondent Morris H. >mi'h
@t M.Gale ir rnrs iiocr e, al ' re-
,pondcnts Sarah " Manchester respondent. AIT.
ic,p;necnt. agr. the Fdeiiiy Casualty Company, ap
liant Colnclia Il. Gannd rc,p"ndcn'' Act Inc
Dcnman " pcard-lcy and another agt Martin q;
Johnson ct al: Mary \. Ferguson az; me Mutuai
Aid. etc. Association Il Rochester: Mary A. -
Tucker. appellant at. Comnla Gilman respondent.
Judgment affirmed with costs ,,.,.., a..
Theodore Thomas. respondent. agt. the aIslfsl 'n
tual Protective Mon appellant; Wright DnNca and
arOthcr appellants. act ". {. No>mreh rcspoMG'n'"'
,ao"n - ,air"n' nninu'" anncIlan, N,ry r
Ryan. respondent. agt. tn Manhattan ElcNa'r Ian
.,,rdcn, prt' ,,,tv ~ unralo appellant Pedro
Moro lcdou and an Tier appellants Az ircueFarh
{: u.Verme}eT, rNp9nHTn N'...SA H. rcNnondcnf P
jcersc f5cr' iepondea sft the ,d pcagarS S, and
respondent ast tie Ncw iork central and Hudson
River Railroad appellant. lnd.m"m reversed an"
" ,,i,, ,d 800, ,.r, arf X : Doand appellant
Judgment affirmed, with costs win leave 10 answer
"lo, pay , -, 'ae Gin ,r the CIV 81 Dro,b
lyn. re pendent. Judgment a'h'mca without COSTS 10
'f ac S1 4Po9 ' al ap appoant as the Delhi
and Middleton Ra.,o,i COMPANY respondent. ludg
l,wance OF cost, affirmed and costs granted each set
If defendants in the case. 49,, .r 800,
BOSTON Railroad COMPANY respondent. order affirmed.
Win costs. u,., go. Mari, y
wiinsion ct al app-ant,. ludrmsnt rcy.r,cd and
!HtSmen. cn'cer a, s bv ,,r dcf,rd,nt, ap'
f,.,c " ila,+ nv * M. executors ont II h~ estate
, -, , ~ ,rdo,, Grsor reversed and case re-.
question of law. costs to a.ll" the cN,ll =, ,,,.
George " ),'y. appellant aet f'an'.' W. '""''
In re petition OF John VI Llvns,'9n 10 v."SS =, y,
order. order reversed and proc'cd'nT1 F''',u , ~
In the second Division the following decisions wcre
handed down:
Nirma pckav. appellant ag'; 'ha,le> H. ,n,I am
olhc, rcSpSnHel- I?n ~. ri ,l,,1r ,'c
\ Wilson, respondent az, me H-.lol""'i ~ Inns
Eair0d company, "Ilt'''',y r.unnSrnt
tnrics A. Crawford respondent Az 1'r a.
ric.ated I.1i,..' r'"RRe ., SpcS~ and en"tltr
ic,porlcnis Annie +. K,-.emayer. ar infant. ETC..
re- p3, dents 49,, ~, l,s ercr c. h@ acf The
president etc Of the ie1"arr a." 'i'' t, t,,''
.oni'anN' ap~"a'. ; 3, pr'f "l ,iier vrl
iac'nnns 'onIan, ahp,'"il t.,, ,."nii,~,.
% I ri,,r ,a, snnrllant ast. Tranas r. WIlion
ePsndsnt John G. A,es1"ry apPesipi and william am
pclant Magk D,nriser RESPONDENT ast John ho'd
'nnollart All. Timothy Howe ana Others r., pond.
eni- Ehzabcih Il. Wele respondent. at the Norli,s
m, ii,r,sni rcsp.ndcnf art Rowland y lla1zar,i i'm
re- 49,. \,.lh1r,i,a Nichari, appellant. John X.
Ihna1c respondent AT Louis T. i.p-ers. appellant
Edward Ruih respondent. ait Eleanor nih ap
and "a. other re, poideni lanes g. stout ponto.'
AT Tnoma- ZONES. appellant tie National lani Of
Ns>a res pOndcft AZ. robert \. MILE and another,
APP 'l'1H'' Mna'u, M iPrIe. Wrpowru
rD.o,,.,t All The i,r Yor, and ~cA hcsch Railroad
D'irny appellant >lmg, Ncilros. respondent at.
I,ir' yal"y ,ta.,r ,Hd Nsn'.lsrtnfIit COMPANY.
no. ,'rd.,t AIT Edward b. ,olp, appellant NilI.an.
iS,IIgsrd ,ssrHld crf arf william. H. ilur, and an
I',t|o. .rrcl,rf, james Dunn respondent AT.
q qi ttrii,,ing APPELLANT FIONA, J. Morton. -
lnordent. AT lioncl J.. Hliru and AL.
S,. apr at. Ncnrt Na-cmarcn appellant
lnhn h. Ucaly appellant agi the Mayor etc. Il
So, N-x and Niuc.i,f Carl ;,.- poudetie. Carrie l.
Mcacharn. respondent at. The Sew York -ta;e Nh
,,.l rerrG; t-.ofafl0l app. liant. James + Nou.lf
>, Ill., aypclln.- a-i Joseph = Williams re- pondcnt
Indr,ocii affirmed With fi.t.
,r',n.f G %.,uz, afucli,rt at Jesse Oakley r..
su1,dc,t. Mar + -a'gcr ci a. rrspoudcff. AIT
lIhu & merritt. appellant. Charles il. DwInuclic
appellant AIT the Ncn orr Central Railroad corn
WuY. r,p9ndcni william ''sNelA re p~nde"t A.
N"'"'.'i - '.'il" az" "ll,."I "'i''i"''',
pArn J'inev ana ano N-mnd"nts, az. ~" iN Z"
Iroohi fi. aiI"i@h'. Wary I""ff,' W'iNI'rA',' a.n
Il, ca, 81 en- - i',.''N ~ ,,',,,' t. AZ
r,loIdoNt. Leighton Williams a receiver of the
Bar Iron ana >"c company appellant, aet '.fNp
,rr,. r',,,.l ,,tti "ntt. q, ,lli, ,b. cvcnt ' '-
william ~cphn ATT the cav # ItnOhlvn for an