Los Angeles herald., 1890-06-26
LEGAL.
ORDER DIRECTING ABSENT DE.
PENDANTS TO APPEAR.

TN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED
i States, Ninth Circuit, Southern District of
Manuel Jesus Gables, complainant, VS.. James
A. Girard, Joaquin Soto, George w. Hearst,
Dolores Diaz Menesses Adolfo Carrasco
Aibano, Elisha w. Howe, Louis NJ. Girard,
Ricardo ]. Bulge and the State of California,
respondents
No 166 in equity
1t appearing to the satisfaction of the court
M. Girard, Dolores Diaz Menesses and Adolfo
Carrasco Albano, defendants in the above
entitled suit, are not citizens of the state of
California and cannot be found therein, and
are not inhabitants of and cannot be found in
said Southern District of California, and that
none OF them will voluntarily appear thereto,
and it further appearing to the satisfaction of
the court from the amended bill of complaint
that Ricardo J. Bulge has departed from the
state of California, is not an inhabitant of the
found therein, and will not voluntarily appear
in said suit: and it further appearing that this
suit is brought to enforce claim to and to re-
move cloud upon the title to real estate
within said Southern District of California con-
sisting of the land and claims of the complain
ant in the above entitled bill:
1t is therefore ordered and directed that the
following named defendants, who are absent
from are not inhabitants of, and cannot be
found in said Southern District of California,
VIZ: Louis M. Girard, citizen of France, and
whose residence is to the complainant in the
above-entitled bill unknown; Dolores Diaz
Menesses citizen of the Republic of Chill and
Carrasco Albano, formerly a citizen of the Re-
public Of Chilli and a resident of Santiago in
said Chilli, but whose citizenship and residence
is now to the said complainant unknown;
Ricardo ]. Bulge, citizen of the state of Cali
fornia, resident of San Francisco in said state,
but who has lately departed from said state and
whom the complainant is informed and believes
is now in the Republic of Chill; and each of
them do appear, plead answer or demur in said
suit by the 9TH day of July, 1890; and that this
order. be served on each of said defendants if
practicable. wherever found, by delivering a
copy thereof, together with a copy of the bill of
complaint, each certified by the solicitor of
complainant to be correct copy, at least
twenty days before said 7th day of July, 1890,
such service to be made by such persons as the
solicitor of complainant may choose and to be
proved by the affidavit of any person serving
the same, and that for the service of this order
upon any absent defendant or defendants upon
whom personal service thereof is not practi
cable, copy of this order, certified to be cor
rect by the solicitor of complainants, be pub
lished in the Los Angeles HERALD, a daily
newspaper published at Los, Angeles, in the
state of California, not less than once week
Tor six consecutive weeks before the 9TH day of
July, 1890; and it is further ordered that in
case any of such absent defendants shall not
appear plead, answer demur within the
time limited by this order or within such fur
ther time as this court may allow, and upon
proof of said service and of publication of this
order, and OF performance of the directions
herein contained, this court will entertain
jurisdiction of said suit and will proceed to the
hearing and adjudication thereof in the same
manner as II each of said absent defendants had
been served with process within the Southern
District of California, but said adjudication
will, as regards said absent defendant or de-
PENDANTS who may not appear in said suit
affect only the property and rights which are
the subject of said suit which are under the
jurisdiction of this court.
Dated May 12th 1890,
ROSS, District Judge.
l certify the foregoing to be correct copy of
the original. NOBLE HAMILTON,
Solicitor and of Counsel for the Complainant.
ma27-tu6t