New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1890-12-14
WHAT BROOKLYN TALKS OF.
OBSERVATIONS HERE AND THERE IN TIE
CITY OLE CNUkCNEN.

If
Dol inc one wiz" '-9 ''' - $500, 1,,ht IN, action
columns IN th' he"SPdp.' 80 ,,.... ~ a., .tt,r
OF the "ehefaI Term VI '' '.,, =, a,rdo rce
OF me A''anu' ave , rras ,rt If $50.
W, WIN '''' ,rr ,,noi,,tod some time ago. whose
cons t 10 the construction Oh 'le PoPoSV" '""
to b. accepted in lien Oh OF inc consent oi 'o PVF
erty Owner, Gl)rS the hue provided mat Inc ooni'
sone,- reached the conclusion that the ROAD "d'
uuhlc Necessity. They took large amount oil 'e'u-
monv on both sides Of the GA stion and then spSn'
some time i'm celebrating upon what they mar '''",",
Their report in favor OF te projected 1oaH was ""''.'
in 10 the court toward the eHd II August ana '"' ~
been confined 10y the General Term. IIi' "'~' CIV
road one step nearer. but does not yet MAKE IL '''
tainty TIE obiectns property owncr>-p"h'9> II
would not De TO much 10 CAL t@m TIE oo'"''"Io
property Owuers-wll doubtless carry the '"'r ~ ''V
Court Of Appeals, and possibly some te'I4l'"'' MAY
be discovered that VII serve TO reverse TIE J'"S"e"
Just rendered it Is hard To CONCEIVE o' any '''''I
ground ON which The commissioners report '"' ~ 'c'
aside Elevated rapid transit on Mah'I aN'' HAY
no,y he looked forward 10 asSGcd probability.
Reference wa ,n''. -, 1 60 sncr,i.o,s in
e1"e"'o "0''D'' 1. dutic q. q poart NJ Can
inc l'''' -, ., .to, o,a.uo,ti,cIv slow but
vaS'cIs' Wv u.' .o.. sncndirr marty 1brc, weeks
nv . ,a ocht 90 have bee, don. in one il turn,
v" =, ,4 c,.,les.uo., a bluudor Was
fir, VI ,.rti.f
maze "heie'F 'Nc '''V " a. w. C,,n,, ,,,,,,.,
in the count loi 9l'I'" ' ' amy
mace nearly -'VVo - ". , ~ t.,, i' '
Piu'""H = ''S" -. r, case ,ri,ht cai,, a~i.a
40 r tor vouId mac all n. ditIcr,rco
!" ~ ,, J., il t the first hinder NJ the Kind
a. .. ,,,,r,,i.os bavo made ~ fact if i. clear
una Wv ~ i..- .l.c, fin, ., ..,,. -, r,.,,l.
thd' le NH''c,' VI .,,,.,, ,.. t.
Nh hecu' ''o''"7" ''' ''..s.i, wa" vi '
'"'", -. 49,, l,,,,,,i,,,,e If q ", .,,o,,,, 90
-.
'''''
Navor Chapin saw III To irterpue his veto in
reference To the action Of The Aldermen I'm raising the
,aary of the CITY Auditor after Januul l. since the
AIdermcn's resolution was palpaily contrary T. the
pr7vi,io, # the charter and wa acccrue!v nun and
void a veto Wa, hardly necessary. c9cclauv from Il
Mayor who is 80 chary Of vctoc, a, VI. Chaplin Per
lap> though he tAoucht tia, he ,horet and simplest
way # putting on record the nle4alirl0f the Alder
mems action since the veto &C, mpaui-d hv "a
communication from IN. Corporation Co,el shown.
who'd, tb. increase in salary va, lcp-laut 10 tba
cbr,er ,lo NOR, sion of this durncnt vould
h, hco, s,acie,. f., ,,-iic the maticrif the Mayor
III ,,i., .rt.. F,-l.~ siyc- If l.>tit H.. = hor.
oro-of all tl,e veioe, iltcrposcd by MI HAHN Iic
ba io,n almost three year, in Office aucths number
~ vetoe, ucudin. tli. last one is only mr. none Of
Them rcla,n, 10 matter, OF great impor'asc 20 in
ter from this, however that during the las three wears
the acton Of tie Common Cound ia, ben the ELI
bodinent Of supreme wisdom and Intelligence eNccp,
in three or four instances would l. ha;y and ui-
reasonable
II ought 10 be said that the spirit0f tl charter r.
strictly adhered to in the matter OF Increasing Official
salaries. would have prevented the 1000 increase i'm
Mayor Chapin's salary year ago Ne terms of the
fundamental law IL is true, Iofuu Iy the increase
Of the salary OF the hcad oil ueP'ileIt during an
Official term OF once or between e'V'n "a ana tho
LIST Of January following Tie rean Aeefor is
obvious II IS 70 remove the parti~a element from
the Aldermcn's action in ordering an Increase. Il
the Aldermen had acted i'm the case the Auditor
prior 10 election day they might havoiade the adj
vance for the benefit Of A Republican inSd OF a Demo
GRAFT The same principle ought certain 10 apply IN
the case Of the Mayor who If noI strict the head OF