davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Sedalia weekly bazoo. [volume] (Sedalia, Mo.) 187?-1904, 1890-11-18
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.
STATE OF MISSOuRIl

COUNTY OF PETTIs.
In the Circuit Court of Pettis county, J an
uary term, 1891. The state of Missouri
at the relation and to the use of John
Mckinley, collector of the revenue
within and for Pettis county in the
state of Missouri, plaintiff. vs..
Joseph Brown defendant. Mo- at mi,
day comes the plaintiff herein. by It's atror
ney Gilmer Gilbreath and flies its % ii ion
alleging among other things that dsfrrd-
ant Joseph Brown is not a resident of The
state of Missouri. Whereupon i is ord r.
ed by the court that said defendant b. 10
titled by publication that plaintiff has
commenced a suit against him in this
court, the object and general nature If
which is to enforce the lien of the .,s'e Of
Missouri for taxes for the years 1882 1873
1884, 1885, 1886, 1887, and 1888. o. rhe
following described real estate situated liz
the county of Pettis and state of Mis-
souri,, to-wit: IS acres, being the south
west quarter of the south wsst quarter az
section thirty FIVE (S') township forty seven
(47) range twenty (20) except FIVE (5)
acres In the north east corner, and
unless the said Joseph Brown
be and appear at this court, ut the next
term thereof, to be begun and holden at
the court house in the city of Sedalia, ia
said county, on the first Monday of Jauu-
ary next, and on or before the third DAY of
said term, If the term shall so long con-
tinue-and il not, then on or before the
last day of said term-answer or plead to
the petition in said cause, the same will be
taken as confessed, and judgement will be
rendered accordingly. And it is further
ordered that copy hereof be published,
according to law, in the Sedslia WEEKLY
BAzoo, newspaper printed and published
in Sedslis, Pettis county, Missouri-for
four weeks successfully, the last insertion
whereof shall be at least fifteen days be.
fore the commencement of the said January
term of this court. Witness my hand and
the seal of said court this 18th day of
October, 1890.
T. A. FOWLER, Circuit Clerk.
By z. r. MARVIN, ID. G. II-Isw4t
Gilner Gilbreath, plaintiffs attorney.
The Sedalia weekly bazoo. [volume] (Sedalia, Mo.) 187?-1904, 1890-11-18
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.
STATE OF MISSOURI

COUNTY OF PETTIs.
In the Circuit Court of Pettis county, Jam
nary term, 1891. The state of Missouri
at the relation and to the use of John
Mckinley, collector of the revenue
within and for Pettis county in the
state of Missouri, plaintiff, VS..
Elizabeth J. Zaimer and q. w. Stephenson
defendants. Now, at this day comes the
plaintiff herein, by Its attorney, Gilmer
Gilbreath and files its petition, alleging
among other things, that defendants Eliza
beth j. Zeimer and G. w. Stephenson are
Mt residents of the state of Missouri
Wherenpon it is ordered by the court that
said defendants be notified by publication
that plaintiff hiss commenced a suit against
them in this court, the object and general
nature of which is to enforce the lien OF
the state of Missouri for taxes for the
years 1881, 1888, 1884. 1885, 1886, 1887,
and 1888, on the following described real
estate situated iu the county of Pettls and
state of Missouri to-wit: Forty acres be-
ing the northeast quarter Of the southwest
quarter of section fourteen (14) township
torty-seven (47) range twenty TO-
and unless the said Elizabeth j.
Zeimer and g. W. Stephenson
be and appear at this court, at the next
term thereof, to be begun and helden at
the court house In the city of Sedalia, in
said county, on the first Monday of Jsnu-
AIRY next, and on or before the third day of
said term, If the term shall so long con-
tinne-and If not, then on or before the
last day of said term-answer or plead to
the petition in said cause, the same will be
taken as confessed, and judgement will be
rendered accordingly. And it is further
ordered that copy hereof be published,
according to Law, in the Sedalis WEEKLY
BAzoo. newspaper printed and published
In Sedalia, Pettis county, Missouri-for
four weeks successfully, the last insertion
whereof shall be at least fifteen days be.
fore the commencement of the said January
term of this court. Witness my hand and
the seal of said court this 18th day of
October, 1890.
T. A. FOWLER, Circuit Clerk.
By e. r. MARVIN, d. c. 11-1sW4t
Gilner Gilbreatb, plaintiffs attorney.
The Sedalia weekly bazoo. [volume] (Sedalia, Mo.) 187?-1904, 1890-11-18
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.
STATE OF MISSOURI

STATE OF MISSOURI, !
COUNTY OF PErTIs.
In the Circuit Court of Pettis county, JAM
uary term, 1891. The state of Missouri
at the relation and 70 the use of John
MCKINLEY, collector of the revenue
within and for Pettis county in the
state of Missouri, plaintiff, p" W.
J. w. Mcconnell, VIM. Mcconnell, Rola
Mcconnell, Linn Mcconnell, Catherine
Il. Mcconnell, 7. V. Hickox and F. w.
Hickox, defendants. Now, at this day
comes the plaintiff herein. by its attorney
GiImer Gslbreath and files Its petition
alleging among other things that Defendant
VIM. Mcconnell is not resident of the
State OF Missouri : Whereupon il is or
dered by the court that said defendant be
notified by publication that plaintiff has
commenced a suit against him in this
court, the object and general nature of
which is to enforce the lien of the State of
Missouri for taxes for the years 1881. 1882,
1888, 1884, 1885, 1856, 1887 and 1858 on
the following described real estate situated
10 the county OF Pettis and State of Mis-
souri, to-wlt: Lots one hundred and sixty
eight (l6S) one hundred aud
sixty-nine 1851 one hundred and seventy
l17O] one hundred seventy one T1711, one
hundred seventy-two [1721. and ore
hundred seventy-three l1731 in
the town of Lamon.e and
unless the said William Mcconnell
be and appear at this court, at the next
term thereof, to be begun and hslden at
the court house in the city of Sedalia, in
said county, on the first Monday of Jsnu-
airy next, and on or before the third day of
said term, If the term shall so long con-
tinue-and il not, then on or before the
last day of said term-answer or plead to
the petition in said cause, the same will be
taken ~ confessed, and judgement will be
rendered accordingly. And it is further
ordered that Q copy hereof be published,
according to law, in the Sedalis WEEKLY
BAzoo. q newspaper printed and published
in Sedalis, Pettis county, Missouri-for
four weeks successfully, the last insertion
whereof shall be at least fifteen DAYS be.
fore the commencement of the said January
term of this court Witness my hand and
the seal of said court this 29th day of
October, 1890.
7. A. FOWLER, Circuit Clerk.
By E. r. MARVIN, ID. c. 11-1sv4t
Gilner Gilbreash, plaintiffs attorney.
The Sedalia weekly bazoo. [volume] (Sedalia, Mo.) 187?-1904, 1890-11-18
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.
STATE OF MISSOURI

COUNTY OF PETTIs.
In the Circuit Court of Pettis county, J an
uary term, 1891. The state of Missouri
at the relation and to the use of John
mckinley, collector of the revenue
within and for Pettis county in the
state Of Missouri, plaintiff, 70.
The Sedalia weekly bazoo. [volume] (Sedalia, Mo.) 187?-1904, 1890-11-18
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.
STATE OF MISSOURI

COUNTY OF PETrIs.
In the Circuit Court of Pettis county, JAN
nary term, 1891. The state of Missouri
at the relation and to the use of John
Mckinley, collector of the revenue
within and for Pettis county in the
state of Missouri, plaintiff, vs..
The Sedalia weekly bazoo. [volume] (Sedalia, Mo.) 187?-1904, 1890-11-18
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.
STATE OF MISSOURI

COUNTY OF PETTIs.
In the Circuit Court of Pettis county, Jan.
usry term, 1891. The state of Missouri
at the relation and to the use of John
Mckinley, collector of the revenus
within and for Pettis county in the
state of Missouri, plaintiff. vs.
Charles J. Burger, defendant. Now, al
this day comes the plaintiff herein, by It's
attorney, Gilmer Gilbreatb, aud files it:
petition alleging among other things that
defendant, Charles ]. Burger, is not a resi-
dent of the state of Missouri, whereupon il
is ordersi by the court that said defendant
be Gifted by publication that plaintiff
has commenced a suit against him In this
court, the object and general nature OF
which is to enforce the lien of the state OF
Missouri for taxes for ;he years 1880, 1881
1882. 1883, 1884. 1887 and 1888 on the fol.
lowing described real estate situated in the
county of Pettis. and state of Missouri; to-
wit. Lais eight (S) and nine co., block
twenty-fnur 2i) 10 the town of Smithton,
snd unless the said Charles J. Burger
be and appear at this court, at the next
term thereof, TO be begun and holden at
the courl house In the city of Sedalia, in
said county, on the FIRST Monday of Janu-
ary next, aud on or before the third day of
said term, if the term shall so long con-
tinue-and il not, then on or before the
last day of said term-answer or plead to
the petition in said cause, the same will be
taken as confessed. and judgement will be
rendered accordingly. And it is further
ordered that copy hereof be published,
according TO Law, in the Sedslia WEEKLY
BAzoo. q newspaper printed and published
in Sedalia, Pettis county, Missouri-for
four weeks successfully, the last insertion
whereof shall be at least fifteen DAYS be.
fore the commencement of the said January
term of this court. Witness my hand and
the seal of said court this 18th aay of
October, 1890.
T. A. FOWLER, Circuit Clerk.
By E. r. MARVIN, ID. C.. u-Isv4t
Gilner Gilbreath, plaintiffs attorney.
The Sedalia weekly bazoo. [volume] (Sedalia, Mo.) 187?-1904, 1890-11-18
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.
STATE OF MISSOURI

COUNTY OF PErrIs. S.
In the Circuit Court of Pettis eountv. Ian.
uary term, 1891. The state of Missouri
at the relation and to the use of John
Mctiinley. collector of the revenue
within and for Pettis county in the
state of Missouri, plaintiff, vs..
Los Angeles daily herald., 1890-02-04
SUMMONS.

TNTHEsUPERIoR COURT oFTHE COUNTY
J. of Los Angeles, State of California:
The Redondo Beach Company, plaintiff, VS..
James Carroll defendant.
Action brought in the Superior Court OF the
County of Los Angeles, State of California, and
the complaint filed in said County of Los Ange-
les in the Office of the Clerk of said Superior
Court.
&C. P, Section 4O7
The people of the State OF California send
greeting to James Carroll. defendant:
You are hereby required to appear in an
action brought against you by the above-named
plaintiff in the superior Court of the County of
Los Angeles State of California, and to answer
the complaint filed therein. within ten days
exclusive OF the day of service), after the SER
vice on you OF this summOns--if served with in
this county; or, if served elsewhere. within
The said action is brought to obtain judgment
against you.
fix DAY within which defendant be required
to pay to this plaintiff the said sum of three
hundred and seventy-fve dollars in U. 8. gold
cSt n sss a
the rate of eight per cent. per annum, and costs
of suit; and that in the event the defendant
should fail to make such payment to plaintiff
within the time so fixed by the Court that de-
fendant, and all persons claiming under him.
be thereafter, that is. from the day last men,
toned for the payment of said money, forever
barred and fOreclOsed of all right, interest and
estate in and to the land dc scribed in plaintiffs
complaint. and said contract and every part
thereof, and of all right to a conveyance
thereof, and that from and after the day 50
fixed by said Court for the payment OF said
money, If the same be not so paid, plaintiff be
fully restored to its former rights and estate in
the land described in the complaint and the
rights and estate therein which it held before
and at the time of the making of said contract
and thst upon the failure of the defendant TO
mske such payment within the time so fixed by
the Court aforesaid, the title of plaintiff to
the land described in the complaint as against
defendant and all persons claiming under him,
thereupon become good and valid and forever
quieted, and that said defendant thereupon be-
come forever barred and restrained from as
serting any claim whatever to said land or 70
the moneys paid by defendant to plaintiff
under said contract mentioned in plaintiff S
complaint as Exhibit A." or to any part or
portion of said land, and for costs OF this suit
and for such other or further order or relief as
to the Court may seem just and equitable in the
premises, as will more fully appear by refer
ence to the complaint on file herein.
And you are hereby notified that II you fall
to appear and answer the said complaint, as
above required, said plaintiff will apply to the
Court, for the relief prayed for in plaintlf's
com mpiaint.
Witness my hand and the seal of the said
superior Court of the County OF Los Angeles,
state OF California, this 25th day OF November,
(sEAL) c. H, DUNSMOOR, Clerk.
BY f z. LOWRY, Deputy Clerk.
j23 tn lot 1t wk
Los Angeles daily herald., 1890-02-04
LEGAL.
.~~N~~~~~~NN~~~~~
SUMMONS.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
L county OF Los Angeles, State of California
r. Inc Redondo Beach Company, plaintiff, VS..
OsKar Huber and Chas. Mensch, defendants
Action brought in the Superior Court of the
county of Los Angeles, State of California and
tne complaint filed in said county OF Los Ange-
res G IN the office OF the Clerk of said Superior
G. c. P. Section 4O7.
The People of the State of California send
greeting to Oskar Huber and Chas. Mensch,
-. You are hereby required to appear in an ac-
ton brought against you by the above named
plalntiif IN the Superior Court of the county of
Los Angeles, State OF California, aud 10 an
swer the complaint fled therein within ten
days exclusive of the day of service) after the
service on you of this summons-if served
within thirty days.
The said action Is brought to obtain the
Judgment and decree of this Court that it fix a
day within which defendants be required to
pay to this plaintiff the said sum of twenty
four hundred and seventy dollars in U S. gold
coin. deferred payments as aforesaid, with in
terest thereon from the 18th day of April,
aS aSS5, & at tne rSte OF elght per cent per annum
fendant should fail to make such payment to
plaintiff within the time so fixed by the Court
that defendant and ali persons claiming under
him / e thereafter that is, from the day last
mentioned for the payment of said money,
forever barred and foreclosed of all right, in
terest and estate in and to the land described
LII pldlublH anu Sdlu COuCrdCJ ana
every part thereon, and OF all right to q con-
veyance thereof, and that from and after the
day so fixed by said Court for the payment of
said money If the same be not so paid plain
tiff be fully restored to Its former rights and
estate in the land described in the complaint,
and the rights and estate therein which it held
before and at the time of the making of said
contract, and that upon the failure of the de
fendant to make such payment within the
time fixed by the Court as aforesaid. the title of
plaintiff to the land described in the complaint
as against defendant and all persons claiming
under him. thereupon become good and valid
and forever quieted. and that said defendant
thereupon become forever barred and re-
strained from asserting any claim whatever to
said land or to the moneys paid by defendant
to plaintiff under said contract mentioned in
plaintiff complaint as "Exhibit A." or to any
part or portion of said land; and for costs of
this suit, and for such other or further order or
relief as to the Court may seem just and equita-
BILE in the premises as will more fully appear
by reference to the complaint on file herein.
And you are hereby notified that If you fail
to appear and answer the said complaint, as
above required, said plaintiff will apply to the
Court for the relief prayed for in plaintiffs
complaint
Witness my hand and the seal of said Supe-
riOr Court of the county of Los Angeles State
Of Calf ,rnia, this 25th day of November, A. d
1889.
(SEAL.) G. Fl. DUNsMoOR. Clerk.
By F. E. LOWRY. Deputy Clerk.
ja23 tn lot law
Los Angeles daily herald., 1890-02-04
LEGAL.
SNS~O-~~~~NN-O1~~No-O-
SUM MONS.

TN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF TIE STATE
i of California, in and for the County of Los
Angeles.
Farmers and Merchants Bank of Los Angeles,
a corporation, plaintiff; VS.. David Pearl, de-
fendant.
Action brought in the Superior Court of the
State of Californis. ii and for the County OF
Los Angeles, and the complaint filed in said
County of Los Angeles in the Office of the Clerk
of said Superior Court.
The people of the State of California send
greeting to David Pearl, defendant.
You are hereby required to appear In an
action brought against YOU by the above named
plaintiff in the Superior Court of the State Of
California; in and for Los Angeles county and
tan days exclusive of the day of service), aft r
the service on you of this summons, If served
within this county; or, If served elsewhere,
within thirty days, or Judgment by default will
be taken against you according to the prayer of
said complaint.
The said action is brought to recover Of you
thereof, from April 22d, 1889, at the rate of
ten per cent psr annum, compounded monthly,
alleged to be due from yon to the plaintiff
n9fs fo 5h
Mug to the plaintiff, payable one day after date,
with interest at the rate of ten per cent. per
annum, payable monthly, and If not so paid, to
be compounded monthly, together with five per
cent. of principal as attorneys fees in case suit
is b. ought thereon, and for costs of suit
Reference is had to complaint for particulars.
Ana you are nereDy uOtlueu tndt II you Iail "
appear and answer the spid complaint as above
required, the said plaintiff will cause your de
fault to be entered, and will take judgment
against you for said sum of $1.050 with in
terest on 81 900 thereof from April 22d, 1889
at ten per cent. per aunum, compounded
monthly, and costs of this suit.
Given under my hand and the seal of the
Superior Court of the State of California. IL
and for the County of Los angeles, this 31s
day of January, in the year of our Lord ont
thousand eight hundred and ninety
(sEAL) CHAS. II. DUNSMOOR, Clerk.
By D. Z. ADAMS, Deputy Clerk
GRAVES, O'MELvENY q SHANKLAND,
Attorneys for Plaintiff.
ia til lot
Los Angeles daily herald., 1890-02-04
NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE SALE

n I. BARKER, PLAINTIFF, VS.. M. 8. NEW
". man, Administrative of the estate OF J.
Frank Newman, defendant.
Sheriff's Sale. No; IL, 191.
Order of sale and decree of foreclosure and
sale.
Under and by virtue of an order of sale and
the Superior Court of the County OF Los An
geles, State of California, on the 18th day of
January, A. D. 1890 in the above entitled
action, wherein o. T. Barker, the above-named
plaintiff, obtained judgment and decree of
foreclosure and sale against M 8. Newman,
administrators defendant, on the 18th day OF
January, A. D. 1890. for the sum of 5000 90
iu gold coin of the United States, which
said decree was, on the 14th day of January
A. D. 1890, recorded in judgment book Is of
said Court, at page 1873. am commanded to
sell all that certain lot piece or parcel of land
situate lying and being in the County of Los
Angeles, State of California, and bounded and
described as follows:
The northeast quarter of the southeast quarter
the southeast quarter of Section number four
a., Township one ~ north, Range fourteen
(14) west, San Bernardino meridian, containing
sixty (6O) acres of land. Reserving, however,
of way for roads, bitches and other aqueducts
over strip of land twenty feet wide extending
along the entire west side of said tract.
Public notice is hereby Civ en-, that on We ednes
day, the 10Th day of February, A. D. 1890, a
IL O'Clock, M, of that day, in front of tn
Court House door of the County of Los Angeles
order OF sale and decree of foreclosure and sale,
sell the above described property, or so much
thereof may be necessary to satisfy said
judgment, with interest and costs, etc.. to the
of the United States.
Dated this 27th day of January 1890
M G. AGUIRRE,
Sheriff of Los Angeles County.
By A. M. THORNTON, Under Sheriff.
Scarborough & Waterman, attorneys for
plaintiff. ja28 tues-4t
Los Angeles daily herald., 1890-02-04
LEGAL.
SALE OF BONDS.
xrNrRAr IRRIGATION DISTRICT col

ryENTRAr IRRIGATION DISTRICT, coll
III usa COUNTY. CAL
Notice is hereby aiven by the Board of
Directors OF Gentfai iss @ lFIosd.,9h ~ plssc that
we'll in the County of Colusa, in the State of
California, on the 4th day OF March in the year
1890 at O. clock p. m of said day, sell to the
highest responsible bidder for cash In gold coin
of The United States, four hundred and fifty
bonds of the said district, to the amount of
two hundred and twenty-five thousand dollars,
being part of an issue of bonds aggregating
the sum of seven hundred and fifty thousand
dollars that sealed pI or osals for the purchase
of said bonds will be received by said board
till the day and hour aforesaid, at which time
aid board will open the proposals, and award
the purchase of said bonds to the highest
responsible bidder but said board reserves the
right to reject ell bide, and will in no event
sell any OF said bo1ds for less than 80 per cent
OF the face value thereof; said bonds are dated
the first day of July in the year 1883, and bear
interest at the rate of per cent. per anRum,
PAYABLE semi-annnally; any interest accrulng
between said date and the date OF the sale aud
delivery of said bonds, shall be credited before
delivery, on the first maturing coupons attached
to said bonds Said bonds will be delivered to
the successful bidder, and the money received
therefor at the District Treasurer's Office in the
town OF Maxwell or at the Colusa County Bank
in the town of Colusa, County and State afore-
said, and each proposal must be accompanied
by a certified check in favor OF K. De Lappe,
Secretary of the Board OF Directors OF Central
irrigation District, for an amount at least as
great as 5 per cent. of the amount total to be
paid for the bonds bid for.
(Above bonds approved by Supreme Court.)
The Supreme Court has decided that Central
Irrigation District was validly organized, and
that its bonds were properly issued, and are in
the form required by law. See Central Irriga-
ton District VS.. R. De Lappe, 70 Cal 351;
r. DE L.PPE,
Secretary of said Board.
Maxwell CAL, January o. 1890.
1a3ld-tO MARI