The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1890-11-14

names previously drawn, who with Mr.. Mouls-
dale constitute the Grand Jury, as follows:
Thomas Moulsda'e, Foreman.
VIM. Fl. Pyle, George Lennon,
VIM. +. Reasin, John w. McFadden,
VIM. H. Tucker, David II. Reynolds
Bennett Osborn, Isaac Rockhold,
John Henry Cole, JAS. Kirkwuod, of Geo.,
Henry l.. Arthur, j. F. Devoe,
VIM. d. Thompson, VIM. F. Cook,
John H. Lovett, Daniel J. Tayson,
Martin GALLON, VIM. 1. STREET.,
John Burkins, John b. Wysong,
John A. McCommons, Hugh B. McFadden.
The Petit Jury, is as follows:
Jas. K. Whiteford, John F. Hays,
Samuel II. Martin, Luther 8. Osborn,
Hugh E. Jones, of Geo., Ben. A. Ayres, of Thos.,
Hargraves Spading, Joseph r. Jones,
Richard NJ. Taylor, Alex. Smith,
VIM. E. Worthington, Daniel Kirkwood, of j.,
Edward j. Colgan, Grafton Devoe,
Octavus H. Tolley, VIM. Craig,
John Green, John Mitchell, Jr.,
James SwariZ, Daniel Lynch,
Thos. r. Nelson, VIM. E. Snodgrass,
Michael Murphy, George Kennedy.
Judge Walters, in his charge to the Grand
Jury, said he had been requested to call their
attention to the practice OF doing certain things
on Hallow Eve night. Nothing, be said, could
be done on that night which it is unlawful to do
on other nights, but where things are done in a
spirit of fun and hurt nobody, they do not come
WlLnln Inc province OF the grand Jury. a man
may set up stricter standard than his neigh
bors but he has no right to impose his ideas on
other people. If things are done In spirit of
malice and with want of regard for the rights
of Others it is the duty of the grand jury to ex-
anime into and punish the guilty parties.
Judgments CONVERSATIONAL Town Bank of
Baltimore vs.. Samuel j. Scarborough. Gilbert
for plaintiff, Williams for defendant.
Same VS.. Ignatus J. Macatee. Gilbert for
plaintiff, Stump for defendant.
Same VS.. Frank b. Macatee. Same counsel.
Same VS.. Frank b. and Ignatius j. Macatee.
Same counsel.
Same VS.. Frank b. and Henry Macatee. Same
counsel.
Lister Agricultural Works vs. Edmund Scar
boro. Williams for plaintiff, Harlan u Web
ster for defendants.
Isaiah 8. Watkins vs.. John Toy. Harlan q
Webster for plaintiff, Williams for defendant.
Prick Company va. John G. Emmord. Will
liams for plaintiff. VanBibber for defendant.
Judgments by Default.-Abram 8. Baldwin
vs. Albert Street,. Davis for plaintiff
Parks Guano Co. VS.. Octavius H. Toley.
Davis for plaintiff.
Silas P. Leight VS.. William P. and William
l.. Leight. Williams for plaintiff.
Mountville National Bank VS.. Richard and
Rachel A. Mcdonald. Harlan u Webster for
plaintiff.
Hartford National Bank of Bel Air vs. John
w. Jewens and John R. Numbers. Harlan u
Webster for plaintiff.
Same VS.. Willard F. Bavless. Same counsel
George W. Reuen VS.. John Ii. Hall. Same
counsel.
Smith q Allen VS.. Solomon F. Rogers. j.
M. McNabb for plaintiffs.
On Wednesday the case of John J. GLADDEN.
against the Maryland Central Railroad Com
pany was begun. This was an action insttut-
ed by Mr.. GLADDEN. to recover $500 damages for
a mare and colt alleged to have been killed by
being struck by locomotive, near the Rocks
of Deer Creek, on the 29th of August 1882
Mr. GLADDEN. testified that his mare and colt
were found dead alongside the track, the mare
having two of her legs broken, both the mare
and colt being cut and SCARED Engineer Dod-
sen and Conductor Cooper admitted that there
was no headlight or the locomotive but were
not aware that anything had been struck. Geo.
Y. Maynadler appeared for the plaintiff, and
VanBibber and Williams for the railroad com
Dany.