The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1890-08-30
HEIR TO FREMONT
her Claimant to an In
t,rest in the Townsite.
~ neRsHBEReER's TITLE.
81 warrant for smuggfer smith's
s.,~~ Bondsmen--The Day in the
Superior Court

-, important case involving an undi-
~ ;rssreat IN the entire Denny d Hoyt addi-
"a s,ar.l g Fremont. was fled yesterday in
rs;.ed States circuit court This suit is
.s5f s. sarsh Hershhereer and John B.
<lereer. Of Ohio. against Edward Blewest.
q 1snant Seb., in whose possession the
- & now held. The complaint was fled
Is ~ & Murray, OF Tacoma, The plaintiffs
- 81 Of an undivided one-seventh and
! "a IS updirsded thlrfy-sixth of the entire
zsss.a consisting OF 214Is acres. The chain
g, - = set forth In the complaint is intricate
-soiicnsed. IN November, 1877, the United
i ~axxrnment issued patent 10 the prop
rs I, he heirs at law of William A.
z..1se then deceased These heirs
usry strickler mother OF the deceased. who
- IN undivided one-seyentb, five living
- md sisters. and the heirs OF deceased
- rssecca A. Rider. who died intesfate in
i. L RIDER, son of this deceased sister,
<esed In December. 1870. the undivided
s1s<xfh Of Msry A. S'rickier. but the deed
sSot recorded until June 26, 1890. At the
~ 4 his purchase he was the husband of
81 fkrshteryer, the plaintiff in this action.
I1166er. ISL. be died interstate, without is
~ his widow inherited one-helf of the
srreuth Interest, which he purchased of
81 81 Eriekler, and the one-thirty-sixth
- he Inherited from his mother The
~ hf1f al his estate went TO his brothers and
- 81 1871. Judge Thomas Burke. who had
1Sjred % uDdivided interest in the land.
Sz<hf suit for decree of
~ ordering the sale OF the
eeriy By referee. and the division
- proceeds. The decree was granted, and
rtppeffy was sold TO A. A. Denny and John
&Sr Fourteen claimants were made de-
kBb Ia this suit. but the plaintif Ia the
Sas sult was not made q party 20 the suit.
fherefore claims that she Is in no wise
81 b tue decree. In March. 1858, John B.
Il eho had then purchased Denny's interest
81 1AHd, conveyed II 70 E. Blewett, who
ifed II as benny & Hoyt's addition, and put
= ne Iaaskef. The plaintiff propounos in
n1asories to the defendant, and prays the
~ soeife himto answer them. Answer an
III Is waived. The defendant is asked to
uiks tach lot and parcel that he
sold, and the name of each
Rtszrs; to state the amount received for the
xt5aDess and agreements to convey: to de-
Ie saeh note. mortgage, contract or other
i6ce OF Indebtedness received from each
- sud to describe each tract or parcel re-
Ing unsold. II is prayed that the defend
y ordered 10 account for the moneys, notes
(1ofeagts received from property sold. and
Of injunction perpetually restrain
ihe dsfendants from selling in violation OF
ykiHfif's rights the property still remain
GsrEold. The plaintiff also prayS for parti-
n6i me property remaining, and for writ of
1Apoaa Of the United States commanding the
sd4nis 10 answer and perform the decree
1eonst may make.
4 STRAW BoNDsMAN ARRESTED.
inch warrants for the arrest of Jay ]. Smith
III n Collins for contempt of the United
= district court, were issued by Clerk r. NJ.
kins By order of judge Hanford Smith
a7ssted and released upon 500 bail to APP
WSepfember 16. The offense, as set forth in
|keonplsint OF Assistant United States District
|<ue5 Sullivan. was giving a straw bond for
To- the appearance of one James Smith,
nltfed for smuggling by United States Com.
1oner Emery. Smith and Collins each
= hat they were worth $500 above indebted
II Last June Smith was indicted by the
* States grand jury, and when called be-
ne cnars for arrangement, did not appear.
bond was dec ared forfeited, and the straw
men also failed to appear to show cause
ne bond should not be forfeited.
IN THE EQUITY DEPARTMENT.
EHswo entries were made upon the blotter
Asze Lichienberg's department. Detective
lkklllard. of the seattle police force, was
Bnad a divorce from Lizzie b. willard by
81 Liehfenberg on the ground of deseriion.
parties We're married in Pennsylvania in
j The plaintiff alleges that bis wife has ever
I'D TO cohabit with him. and for the past
- PEARS has dwelt apart from him.
e jadgment by default for s1,14l6I was
med against J. w. Patterson, of sksgit
lRiy, In favor of s. Mickelsberg. The claim
lx goods sold by Campbell d. Atkinson to the
thsdsnt
A BOUNDARY DISPUTE.
Ehsss stratton convened cnurt in the civil de-
Enent IN the morning TO hear the trial of the
Kd W. s Dubbs VS.. Lizzie Aorre1l and VIM
sE Thomas. boundary DISPUTE. The par.
no mis- case had purchased adjoining lots
1he lake Union addition. The plaintiff al
srsshst the defendants hold fifteen feet of his
f3erty. and prays for decree OF the court fix
Nthe line between the lots according to this
~. The case was taken under advisement
4 be court.
THE DAYS FILINGS.
ne First Bsptist church, OF Ballard, brought
ani' against the Berachah Baptist church,
rging for decree commanding the defend
effe execute a conveyance 10 the plaintiff OF
: nns to the lot purchased of the defendant
4 Hstley alleges that J. H. McGraw is in un-
zvful possession OF number of his horses, and
Eersht suit for decree compelling re-deliv-
q Of the animals or 1895. The chattels were
Esfd By the sheriff under attachment
ne Gilman Park Lumber Company vs. the
ga coas. improvement Company; suit for s27s
aseeourt.
Joan stell VS.. Mary Fitzgerald; suit for 500 on
lhole
frledlasder VS.. W. F. Kelleher q Company;
1sehmeut suit for s244.