St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1890-11-12


in the close race race between Ankeny,
Democrat, and Hooker, Republican, in
the judicial contest. The following is
the vote in the county:
Canty. $40. Ii, OF Young .13,S12
Ankepy. .15,oSS Hooker IA, O37
Pond 49,. 1854 Russell .12, 100
Smith. %, 800
This gives Ankeny plurality of 1851
over Hooker in Hennepin. and Hooker
claims plurality of 2,141 IN Isanti and
Anoka counties, which would give him
a plurality of 200 over Ankeny in the
judicial district. Mr.. Ankeny has been
quoted as cOnceding Mr.. HoOker's cleo
ton. Other Democrats, however, are
not so quick TO give up the
ship, and contest is more than
probable. G. NJ. Foote, chairman
of the county Democratic committee,
said last night: 1--WE intend to have a
recount on the state and judicial tick
cts. L am satisfied that there has been
some queer work on tue part of the in
tellectual giants the Republican council
designated as judges of election. We
will have the satisfaction of demonstrate
ing their stupidity, if not dishonesty, to
the world. Here are few things upon
which shall base claim for a recount:
No return has been made of the vote
on the state ticket Third precinct of
Third ward and the Fourth of the Sec
ond ward. In the Sixth of the First
ward no returns of the vote for Wilson
have been received, that district giving
PAIL, candidate for lieutenant gov
ernor, PIG. In the Fifth district of the
Eleventh ward no return has been
made of the vote for Owen. The
vote for Barrett for lieutenant gov
ernor was 81. In the Sixth district of
the Seventh there were no returns for
| attorney general, and the following dis
trlctS made no returns for clerk of Su-
| preme court: First of the Second,
Twelfth of the Third, First and Eev-
| enth of the Fifth, Fourth and Sixth of
the Sixth, Second and Sixth of the Sew
| enth. Second of the Ninth. First of the
| Tenth, Fourth of the Eleventh. Legis-
| lative returns are missing from First
| gives Castle 20 for the legislature. by
error. From the First district of the
| Third ward no returns were made for
| Swift and Dwyer, candidates for county
commissioner. In the Third precinct of
the Third ward no returns have been
| made on congressman. In the First
| precinct of the Sixth ward Alonzo
| Phillips should be credited with 172 in
| stead of ~ votes. In the First precinct
| vi TIC flrSC ward IDOmdS CantY.
| for judge, is written out as
receiving 235 votes when the
| figures give him PAS. In the Sixth pre-
cinct of the Seventh ward 10 returns
are made for county commissioner. In
| the First precinct of the Seventh ward
| there are no returns for senator. In
the Twelfth precinct of the Fifth ward
the judges did not sign the returns. In
the Fifth precinct of the Fourth ward
no returns were made for county audi
tor or county treasurer.
! in addition to all the errors, under
stand that in many precincts, where an
X was placed opposite the name OF
Thomas CAVITY for judge, the votes were
counted for him solely, whereas / claim
they should he counted for all the Dem
ocratic judicial candidates. 1t. is nv
| opinion these various sins of omission
and commission afford US sufficient
ground for recount, and intend to
have one. There are some peculialities
about the Isanti and Anoka county re-
turns on the judicial ticket also that we
intend to have Investigated, and don't
| Won forget it, -