The Daily bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Hawaii]) 1882-1895, 1890-05-13


that Tie crown was entitled 10 SIX
Challenges altogether,
MI creighton asked Tor iniorlha-
tloh rs TO whcther the jury Us no"
constituted was satisfactory to the
defense. If they were to have iorly-
eight challenges, thch counsel 10r
the prosecution would nave TO ask
for time to consider what to do I'M
der the circumstances.
Mr.. Hatch said TINS was not
moot court. They should ciaim Inc
right 10 rs many challenges ~ inc
law allowed, and 1t was ti'nc enough
TO ralsc t'!c point When thtir regal
challenges were considered 10 DC
exhausted. rms was not Il debating
soc'ety.
Nj. Creighton was sorry Mr..
liatch hau lost BIS temper. Inc
prosecution only wanted informa-
ton to guide their further conduct.
After further discussion by the
Court and Mr.. Davidson, counsel
Tor the defense made known lHaI
they only claimed the r'gUt OF c'iai-
lrn%e with regard to the Jurors call
ed since they expressed satisfaction
win the JorN.
Mi. Ncunlann wished 10 Withdraw
the challenge OF Mr.. FurvlS, which
was only made to have inc point
settled.
Mr.. Davidson challenged Mr..
Nylllc ON nehait OF MIR. biahnh.
Chas. Lehman was called and
sworn: To Mr.. Davidson belong
TO iiakalaui am not familiar with
case OF Goto, have not read any
'hng that has made an impression
upon my mind; no fear OF pubic
opinion controls me MS n juror ;
nave no prejudice To disqna''iy me.
10 Mr.. Neumann--iiaNc no scr""
pies regarding capital punishment;
no preludic" against ia Nahese nave
no acquaintance with defendants.
Mr.. Hatch challenged Mr.. Gill
=. VII oe''''' VI Ni' ''''e'e' ''''
H' ~, n'''' i.,' ""s ''''e". ~. A..
M N n'''"''.'' ""'". ~ :',
~ -" NV ,'-, 9'",, '-"s, ''S''
"o'' e"o"sn w '''''' 7t"'', VIC E I""
yo'' SPAN w my '',e.'" . =" Nv,
n''" Wv n"v ""o" ",i". ,' :, ~
'''". ''e',.'' '" e'.'''v'' W,
'.'.''nons' y, p..J"o'G -; =, " '.,:',
NOV NV "i',G $50, SIAM " "''',' ~ III ,'on.
nc oo'''' 'N'"''' Az N''''''"''''
'o' 'Iie 'e,ln. ILL.,,
'ol'n Nv, N'o! nI was 'I 1T anu
sMoi II ~ ~ -,...I, '''o VI, -; NV" .n Nv
. . MY MY ~, 'o N ~. s'' W o'' VI.
Jury. , 10 .'. Nou n.'a - .o'
INV .n;, "'. .',,,',, o,.n ." ~, Nv,
mi,S m nrc;rdicn oooinst h,noino
man. if br dcservcs + no nreiuIicc
aroinst J,,onasc To tho ComrtN-
I;vn AZ IJnronu hoye haon in tho
nanntry n;nht yo,rs
Ar D,vijson cI,o,Icnoed Mr.
I1nrr;,s ON ho,,olf of AR Mills
-, (I,,,,a., ..oa oo,,aa ,,d
oo''" ~ "', n, ""' '''.o ''n'
s "'; IL ~ :., w. ' wv: '.''on ,Ia,la, Nv"
."'''''''i "..a ,. W
an 49, 81 ,a. , ~ cn'' C 20 80, ,a,
nIoro know no,hino If f,c,s reaf
rn newsnonors m,king IN imnrcs.
sion know none of defendants no.
bodv snoken to me ON matter, car
,mnorti.llv trv case ON evidence
withnut rcoorI ,o surrounding onin
IONS cnnversed with M one ,hon,
casn he,rd others talk about if
talked none myself To Mr. Men
monn-IJave no conscientious scru.
Mes rogording tho dpoth ncpaltv
no nreindice AGAINST japanese
Mr. Hatch chollenged Mr.. IIonk,
IN hoh,If nf Mr. Watson.
l.. Malterre was called ant
sworn: To MIR. Davidson-Hav,
heard and read about case, and re
ceiycd impressions that would lie
quire evidence to remove. To TIN
Court--Impressions are not agains
these defendants; am disqualiiic'
because averse to the death sen
tence.
The Court excused the Juror.
VIM FuIlcr called and sworn
10 Mr.. Dav;dson-IIcard abou
case. have not conyersed with pco
pIc of locality. am of Scotch nation
atty, lived here three years, do 40
know defendonts hovc no hios n