Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1890-08-23

| per- ncaleu Tally eAtet ~ bAAt
judges Of election, make n note a
the bottom, in which IL : said
"rwo copies Of abstract and talll
sheet TO lie returned 10 the Itai
Commission In this case, how
ever, the judges have returned bu
one abstract and tally sheet, bein-
the ones from which | have qlOtei
Now, the question arises, what J.
the proper return before this b1ar'
from which and upon which they
are 10 canvas this vote between
Gallagher and T0rOutOe 10 i ably
argued, and strenuOusly insisted
upon by counsel for Gallagher, tina
In our Cauvassing We are a. Ice con
fined alone 20 what j. called her
the abstract; ami that, although u J.
a mere statement in figures Of th'
votes cast for each one, and although
Il i accompanied by this tally sheet
which i a part % the return We
cannot consider the tally sheet iDl
any purpose. but are 70 blinIiy iot
low this abstract. no matter wh3i
7 discrepancy or irregulariiy thcr,
/ may appear upon the abstract auI
tally sheet, or between the two.
am Of opinion that this tally Sheel
j. necessary part Of the return 81
the judge % election under the
statute, and this opinion becomes
! conclusive when we consider thal
the votes are 10 he listed n tAey arr
| counted for each candidate. y hS
means something more than a mere
setting down Of figures In round
numIbers, or la bulk. 10 means set
ting out, "A listing, tallyins. uothei
Z wuniz. the legislature meant thhi
/ the Judges should count the vote,
aud list the votes ~ counted, ethel
/ 10y numerals or by taliius In some in
| islligibleway, and that that li-t should
/ % itself contain a ftir statement ni
the v1te- cI,, FOR each cauiiiaic.
[ There i NJ provision made in THE
I statute for any abstract aud when
I the iuigr- ul election undertook O.
certify iuau abstract, which merely
gives theam0uut Uf votes in bulk fJT
each candidate, they have la no
sense compiled with tine statute.
Now. then, under the Uile that !
have announced, u must be ap
parent that thr judges u election
in footing up the votes received ~
Toronto. have male n mistake Ia
their addition. by ureiiiiug % him
les votes than me- received 10 the
number Of xix votes: Or they have
male a mistake ia Pl,tiug down
uQon the tally sheet numerals AZ
grrgiting fix votes which hc las
40; received. AMI in either event,
here j. discrepancy uE irrrEuArity
ryhich mlkts IL impossible fIg this
t1ari 10 reach a jus; aui Intelligent
result; aud, la my opinion, one IN
which the statute INTENDED that the
cauvas-iug blari should Te-rri %
the ballot box. q a-sertliu what b.
the true result between these two
candidates. feel strengthened In
these conclusions, tir-t, BECAUSE it J.
an intelligent aud common scuSr
construction % the statute, AMI
reaches an intelligent and common
sense insult. / feel more secure in
this position because % the fact that
when We shall have gone D. the
ballot box, ani r;vnUj 10, HUi
counted the ballots aud J=CrTtliuc-i
the r,~dlts According ~ the electors
have seen Yr0Vcr - register z by
their votes, thst then W. reach the
truth: and o. this result. when We
DO reach the trIih. all gIui citizens
will tow with Difference auI respect
The next question % which
.N.anHH d HH.HHH
which arises uI1u the returns which
aru placed before tii- hoard from
Poll No. !. prcciuet No. ], II salt
Lake county. between tine yIuIi-
dates Tor county r-csripr. 10 az
par from tine returns that two PER
sons. one ly the name Il Page aud
one los the name %; tumCl. were
r1nte-tiug c1uiiIltU- fHr the Office
%! comfy rccIri-s II Salt Lake
county. and thr judge ~ election
have returned that a given number
% votes were ra-t i1r John ~. Rumtl.
ami given numb r for Henry rs..-.
/ % Others the returns ar. Tor J. ~.
IluUel and n. Page. let iu other.
the returns ar. Tor John Il. R4myl.
Jr., aui Henry Page. ur 10. Page.
Iu yet ia others for !. ~. Ruu-I.
ir.. ami Grr ligIr' P-ly, 20 n
raLg.
The counsel n,ps,-,l Iiiug PAGE Or
.rcl, aud say ihBl the votes Gr.ugus-i
.ly the Judge ~ the election frr !.
n. Rumyl Or John a.. Bum-l ought
not and cannot b. rUuutel Tor J. n.
itImel, Jr.- ur John II Eum.L Ir.
They say ia their Argument that ~
'Ir ~ the nam uf J. II. ug John II.
.iumrl i concerned, that they
make no point upon the difference .
"a the manner iu which 70 T. -I-lIci. 7
lCt ;Eat " hen tine WORT Junior T. /
attached 90 EImci'- name, it iuii- .
'a'cs a diil-rrut person ium that F.
ghvu Il j. not sIat,I shl-l o. ltumyl'- .
lame.
Upon this question I have hli ~ I.
mail difficulty. BIt here. a.liu.
y e resort o. tine dr,'iigi csI~,-z. ant /.
sac reason cf tie law. i'riirrc / 7
.''' al T. - Wugs Dut 4 core { result.
r at any rate one which j. entirely
satisfactory o. myself.
B1Ivier, Ia his Law Dictionary. .
FOL. ] -ays - this word. 1T ha-blru
irlt "a De- no par; = "A mans name,
'ui au a-iliti1u los Use a'II = con-
'cui-ui distinction l-twpuu q
sihrr AMI -In % tee same uSm-.
Nuy m ,tter that dia;ius ui-ht7 Trr- .
n renders the addition % Junior
al senior uuucCes-Iry. Hut II
ltheT ard son have the -lu'r ugu'r.
he iliHyF shall hc prIml fle;r in
ended, Il junior lt. not added. or
lm. other matter IL distinction. 80
'ur ihi> the author cites many
uihDgitips.
Turning to the Decided eases. I
Ind IN the ease of BsIWn ". b.
light, reported iu . BilsklDrI. -
(. e. - Am. Dec. 8sg. b. + said: .
inst u father anu s1u arr both I
sllzi 4 Il. hv Naming : n the
,'fc- pima i1Cic shall h. IN
'niCt.' AEi ia the cas-. Il John
ln y. Ellison. Il Am. Dst. lf3. it .
said: Junior is no Tart
the nuns % a mI1. II j.
either the name ~ baptism nor tine ,
anne Uf his family. II il an adii- .
On 10 Distinguish between two [
rr-lu- hcsriuH Gbe -1me uamr Z I
;heIe arr two persons ,
AIMED James Wyatt. usually dis d
usui~hed hy the aiditiou II Jr. or I d
r, the Defendant ha- male q note y
one 81 them. but {, gHirh the n
1'c- on IT. face, does MT certainly e
nj cpnn.u-iyrly designate. To a
hirh ~ thr two the note i made. !
nj delivered j. question urru.f-.. q
birh a. q iu avvrmrut. That tHf. b
De- was mIit o. james Watt Jr.. b
a permissible arermelt. Then. l. "a
.ihing IN the mote o. 80 - -Irh an O
lrsati1u." !
Ia the else % Blyipu -. Hast Z
-. Il Fi-s. ga. IL j. add: In q
. action % debt, 5-uuEh, iy =. D.. q.
=, upon a Judgment. ;lv d.-criu @
"a -et forth the r.ruri - luis- "a
uut Ia favor 81 = b; hI' Tie !.
c1ri produced 81, forth iII.- n
-nt fecoyrt-lhy :. n. Jr.'' H,!I n
n this wa a variance The a
urf. in lis uviniDu say sTf !