New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1890-09-06

BILL senators on tho other side hao po0sto0 "'a'
under a pending bill revenue was only an ihcioen@
In his view revenue under the bill was not AL '"0''
dent; II was only an accident. Iaughter)
The vote was taken ON Mr.. JoneS's amendment
and IL was rcjccted-yeas. 2G; nays, o. Inc Rt'
publicans who voted yea were Mcssrs. Allen, nnNheA
and Plumb Neither Mr.. ingalls,, Mr.. Manderson hN
Mr.. Paddock voted.
Mr. Davs's amendment then agreed to-yeas
3s, nays IS. All the Democrats except MI. bioos-
EFT voted aye. In company with the iolo"inS w
pblicans Mcs.rs Allen. Allison Cullom' Davis In
calls. Mcmillan, Henderson, Mitchell, Moody. Pierce.
Plumb Power Sawyer. SpOOner and Washbun. Ihe
negative votes given by Messrs Aidrich' hiouH-
EFT, Cameron, Chandler, Dawes, Dimunos, ISdr's'
Frye Ilawey, Higgins. Hscock, lioar fa't' quay
sherman, Stewart, stOckbridse and woco"' Mr.
Paddock said ut subsequent stage OF the proceed
i that ho was unavo,dably absent when the
vote WIS taken OH Mr.. Davs's amendment. IL ne
had been present he would have voted for 1t. as lie
had done yesterday.
ON motion Of Mr.. Carlisle, the word "degras'
was stricken from tho free list. Paragraph a'3)
Mr. Plumb moved strike of the free list para
graph 500 hides, raw or uncured' whether ery'
sailed. or pckedr and argued In support OF the mo-
ton 10, 49,,
Mr. Allison expressed the hope that the motion
would prevail
The motion was rejected-ycas IS, nays 90 The
affirmative votes given by one Democru! Mr.
puch. and by the following Rcpublirans MeSsis'
Allen Allison. Cameron. Cullon, Higgins. Ingalls,
MITCHELL Moody Plumb Quay, stewart ""s"o"r''
! Wilson, of Iowa, AMI wOlcott. The Democrats ex-
cent Mr. I,,gl voted In the negative. together Win
fine following Republicans: Messrs. Aldrrh chandler.
Dawes Frye Ialc llawley, Hiscock' Hoar NC i'i"n'
Pierce Plat and sawyer.
MIR Vest moved TO insert In the free list timber
hewn and sawed squared and sided. and sawed ooaus
plank deals and other lumber. OF henioch "m'o"oo''
sycamore white pine and basswood
Air Henderson moved TO strike out Of the amendment
no words .hemlock wildwood, sycamore ana bass
wood leaving tho amendment to apply only TO Jumper
OF white pine. -.
Mr. Carlisle referred to the Inconsistency OF tho
nolcy which on the hand offers bouhts wv 'o'
n,autinc of trees and the other hand ofcrN oo'
lin tbc shape OF a protective duty Tor cutting """
frees: and he advocated the placing oi i""oc VII viz
to- ,i.t en- nc 10 get the lumber from Canada
Mr. platt argued in favor Of protecting the i"hoer
interest a, we'll as any other interest," Vi 'o
Mr. spooncr said that he was not eurpr''eu =.
uroposition from the Democratic size "i u'c '"".
10 nut lumber any other product on LEU ii'' .
hut lie was surprised that . senator VII" '"n'''" "
,hc prt.c,iyc system should propose u pn "hte pine
ON the free list The proposition was peculiar o"'
n loft yellow nine and otter wood product, dhuaoic ~
90 pcr 900 feet and II singled ont INC whi'c p'""
nrdur Of Wiscon.in and Michigan ana o' ono Pr w"
other states to he put on the fire." li't. why Nv ~
,ho,ld tina, be done! 30 product rcprc>e"'c" i"''
more than White pine lumber. what rea'"h ' "
cvcn for PROTECTING American miners against dh"'""
miners and refusing - protect .ii'e'H"' '
against Canadian lumbcrnc;.i
Afr Frye ur-ucd against the Amendment ihc'c
was a capt,l VI 800 0noW nvrs"d III "r' '
industry II the United state. and there "c'c lo'''
able bodied men cmploycS! In that business Inc '''
nctitor Of the United state in lumber wiz '"'
wncr. the wage, Of the employed in the business
I,yg,r fuaIi
states. How coud amy senator. hc '.'"ci' VII" w
ucycl In rrntrctioI >aid re believed IN ~ 'o'c !"
expo,e that million Of lab"r!ng men III 'n' "'''
.tatc, t. competition WITH the limlcfH'n W "a..'
What Lind cf prU,"rtioui> was Nuri a senator i"'
..u.,ors from Maine had voted dnt"' Oh lr IN or
coal wool and of Art clc~ Whi'h N''hc III
800. . :, h,vc free, WIS I,cAi,' tho>r
.o,,,ors were protcttlpltts. And now sh"n'n TIE
Scuat RS from Mime .oa or Kansas or ''"'"'"" VIZ
cau,c they Thought that lumber n'I'' hc =" "P'' Ia
those stat7- II IL OF the ire" Ii-t' w." ~ '"'
duties ON lumber and tiil rnnuunrc tmtn' ''N P''
feet oni,;,1 There - '>t'n'y III '"'" pro
lection there right and justice IN u All" ~
oa alton lad better be made by those senators mat
tbcv were traders and would vote TOT t'e r"n'
VIZ stewart argued that Of all the countries IN the
World canada WAS tie last that nn-hi I" DE- ih'"'"
| in a, American tariff LII. because a'Is ci>'r"'.
mated ac,inst everything tst came nom TIE "''o'
states. - , All,
vr Hlslr also opposed the amendment. ana 'ao
fila, - Iumbrr were put on III" fire." h>t 'h' ''i'"
would not he worth viii ting after. MI 40 y"
o,,,cd II, and said Shat h" Wa not ADV Il" JON W.
senate corp, 81 >appcrs and m'i'"r' WHO "'''
inc 1, undrfmn" TIE wall 81 prt ''oh'
Tho discussion was further carried on bv VII gray
ar w..h,,,rn and Mr. Mcpherson In support OF the
amendment and By Mr.. fimund'. Mr. Allen Mr.
Hall. NJ Mitchell and Mr. strhh'idp' W "pP''''''''
Mr. spoorcr said he Lad vded steadily aid con
,n,,, tr pro..,lon 10 Industries ia whirh his state
hal 40 iniacGa" interest, yet the soma i'''"'
Nebraska had proposed tn mike a di-rr'"'"''
s-ins, ,hc state, Of Michigan ard Wl-'"i'> sin u"
,,L u,drr., tad t,r plp-ophy "f IN" Senator irhi
NJ. nr, and ot the senator from Nc" '"f '' 'i' M
| amendment which pr"po,"d simply I" s'fih" oo"'
,,e hit. pine industry Of Michigan and Wisconsin was
no, only u di. elimination against those Staf'' un'
All aba nd rnment OF the prot"''i'c system.
W. N,odcr.ou commented nf-n Mr. SpOoncr'-
c,rucstnr,S IN the defence of iJca Interest ana Sh
that General Hancock had bsn laughed nj Tor SAYING
HAT the taiin local question: No l'"'r u''i'I'
| how ever had ever leca slohcn; and senators w'ro
rDvc.l"L IA their votes and pee hes bN i"l 'r'N''
ard I,a pr lud!,r'. The senator from Wisconsin
lad NOT oni tipped him tMr. Henderson, in his v"t's
| IN f,.nr Of prtccton He did not believe that any
State ca,cci.d the state Of Nebrasha III devotion I"
TIE. general principle Of pwtc ito bit al the same
| fine the pc,rlc Of Ncb,sha had certain desires t.
which II va, hi, duty to conform. The ehort g" ti'
| Scra,, =, from Wisconsin and Michigan va only the
| nm, mi, Of LII, btc-- II the r:a,pn- greed Of
t,, Gentlemen engaged In the lumber lu'inr,~ which
prompted thrm I" tie dc.iuc'ion q" the great i"irN''
NJ tr. county,. cryatlvc Legislatures OF ms
s,a,, and several conventions had urged on Their
representatives In tho Senac tO do what they cou!h In
having white pine placed the free list and while
he W., devoted to she interests OF the entire ran,ry
s,iII When his state spoke in such terms a. those he
| proposed to comply with her desires
| Mr. Paddock said that 20 long a. lie occupied a
scat in the senate he would conform to the desire OF
hi, state so far he could do without injustice.
Mr. Evarls argued that local and limited Interests
| should not be permitted to cncrTrh on the general
| urrcipIc OF protection to industry and capital.
| Mr. Gray accepted Mr.. Evart~'s proposition. bnt
! argued from 1t that tho tax Oh lumber was at war
with thN principle. Tho lumber interest wus local.
but tho Interest Of cheap material for tho houses and
| furniture OF the people was general and universal.