Waterbury evening Democrat., 1890-11-05
A. SUPERIOR COURT CASES. la The Divorcs~ Mn In Excellsnt
 Working, ordSr. les"st.on

Working Order. '1e'- oh
 Sheriff Gates opened the superior court here this morning at 10 o'clock, Judge Sanford on the bench.
 Attorney O'Neil, appearing for the plaintiff in the case of Smithwick vs Hall & Upson Ice Co. made application that decision should be rendered for two judgments in place of one and that the expense of securing a photograph of the building on which the plaintiff was in- jured be met by the defendant. The application for n decree of two judg- ments was granted.
 The divorce case of Rosolie Lobdell vs George w. Lobdell was next on the cal ender, Mrs Lobdell and Minnie DeGraff were the only witnesses. Mir and Mrs Lobdell were married in Kingston, N. Y., in 1871. Lobdell deserted her six years ago. She has not heard from him in two years, Judge Sanford granted the decree on the ground of desertion. | The next case was Emma Scott vs Al win w! Scott.s They were married in Auburn, New York. The plaintiff only lived with her husband few years. Had not seen him for years. The last place was in Troy, New York. Mrs Sarah Gail, a sister of the plaintiff was present. A decree of divorce was granted on plea of desertion.
 The next case was Smith vs Smith The wife petitioned for divorce on ground of assertion, cruelty and intem- perance. The plaintiff lived four years in Waterbury and had not seen her hus- band in two years. While she lived with him, he abused her and was continually 1 drunk. The decree was granted.
 George w. Seeley, an aged man asked for divorce from his wife, on the ground of desertion. Mir and Mrs Seeley were married December 27, 1883, and Mrs Seeley left his home in March 1884. The decree was granted on the ground of desertion.
 Charles E. Thomas vs Esther Thomas application for divorce on the grounds of adultery. They were married 9 years ago and have not lived together for 9 years. The decree was granted on the grounds asked. George McKenna vs Susan McKenna, an action for divorce on the grounds of intempSrance. They were married in December 1, 1871, but had not lived to- gether for two years. The decree was granted.
 Judson Corcoran had a bill filed for divorce from Mattie Corcoran, but for two years neither hls lawyers nor him. self had been heard from A cross bill was filed by the wife for desertion. Judge Sanford adjourned the case for one month to see if the whereabouts of the husband could be discovered.
 Judge sSanford then ordered the empannelling of the jury. The follow ing are the names of the jury: John J. Leonard, Abijah H. Gilbert and David l.. Osborne of Danbury. Daniel Bartholo- new, Hobert Sperry and Wales Terrell of Ansonia; David. l.. Crane, Ebert J. Treat and Benjamin F. Richards of Orange; J. A. Blanchard, William c. Corcoran.a and Thomas F. Cook of Meriden: Virgil F. Sperry, Lewis Thomas and Frank l.. Doolittle of Woodbridge 1; William Brotherton. Timothy Rohan, and Ephraim s. Brown of Milford. Judge Sanford excused David s. Os. borne of Derby and William c. .Cochrane of Meriden for the term. Sheriff Gates then adjourned court to convene again next Tuesday morning at II 80 o'clock.