The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1890-02-05

her land beyond the reach of her husband,
signed and acknowledged a deed in which
the land was conveyed to her children, all
OF whom, with one exception. were infants.
had knowledge of and assented to the con-
eyance After the deed was signed and
acknowledged the grantor caused it to be
recorded, and then took possession of il.
intending to retain the deed and the lar
in her possession until her death. Held, the
facts constitute prima facie q delivery and
acceptance of the deed.
1887. Board etc.. VS.. David T. Taylor ct
al. Jay c.. c: Reversed. Berkshire. j.
Elliott and Coffey dissent. A contract en-
tered into between a board. of commits
sioners and a firm of attorneys by which
the latter are employed to act as county
attorneys for q period of three years for a
certain annual salary, TO take effect three
months after its execution, when the board
would be r~eorganized, is contrary to public
policy and void.
1851. James A.. Shewalter VS.. Priscilla
A. Bergman. Jay G. q. Affirmed. Elliott.
is brought is one of general jurisdiction, it is
unnecessary to allege jurisdictional facts.
9. A complaint for seduction alleging that
one of the means used was that the de-
PENDANT promised to marry plaintiff, 1t is
unnecessary to aver that she relied on the
promise. 8. When q party desires to pre-
sent a case under Section 600 of the statute,
and Rule 30 of this court, the course therein
must be pursued. 4. In an action by a
woman for her own seduction it is proper
of the defendant.
1856. Midland Railway Company vs..
Arthur L. Wilcox ct al. Madison T.. Z.
Motion to modify mandate overruled.
152oS. George W.. Calvin, administrator.
VS.. Meridian National Bank: Hancock
c. G. Certiorari awarded and time to file
brief extended.
15S4O. Frederick Rueber vs. o. g. NJ.
Railway Company. Martin c. c. Appel
lees objections to submission overruled.
A.. Peelle, jr. Marion. c. C.. Rehearing de-
MED.
COURT.
Room 3-don. Lewis Q. Walker. Judge.
The Meridian National Bank VS.. George
F. Kirchoff ct al; note. Dismissed and
| costs paid.
The indianapolis Lumber Company VS..
the Vest Indianapolis Lumber Company;
mechanics lien. Finding for plaintiff.
Nc,o Suits Filed.
George M. Flster VS.. Hayden s. Bigham;
to cancel deeds, quiet title to eighty acres
of land in Martin county and for $1,000
damages.
Nicholas w. Wycoff VS.. Margaret Wycoff;
divorce on the grounds of abandonment.
habitual drunkenness and cruelty. Gus
tody of four children asked.
Margaret f. Jackson VS.. Richard X. jack
son: divorce on the grounds of non-support
and drunkenness.
August Erbr1ck VS.. Silas Eaglan; suit on
account. Claim, $500.
CIRCUIT COURT.
Hon. Livingston Rowland, Judge.
State of Indiana ex rel. Morgan G. Fra
zier VS.. Samuel McCray; on contractors
bond. Judgment on demurrer to COM
plant.
August Richter VS.. Frederick Meyers ct
al; account. Trial by court. Finding for
defendant.
Lowe Carey VS.. City of Indianapolis eft
al; damages. Trial by jury. Verdict
against the Consumers Gas-trust Company
for S75.
VIM. johnson VS.. Martha Julian's estate:
claim. Trial by court. Under advisement.
Anna L.. Hogan VS.. VIM. HI. DRAPER; &C
count. Finding for defendant.
A. o. Parsons VS.. John Rosenberg. Find
ing for plaintiff for $40.
John Wacker VS.. Paul Fencht; for posses
sion of real estate. Verdict for plaintiff
giving him possession of property and $50
damages.
Netc Salts Filed.
j. G. Heylman VS.. Moses N. Craig; on
promissory note. CLAIM, S125.
George McMahan VS.. Fred Achgill ct al.
on promisory note. Claim. 500.
The JOhn Church Company VS.. Marion
nj. Elliott; on promissory note. Claim, $500.
George W.. Frey VS.. William H.. Loeper eft
al; on promissory notes and to foreclose a
mortgage. Claim, 5000.