The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1890-08-07
D0NE IN THE COURTS.
III Kentzler Sees Her Alb
Quoted Children
! THEIR FATHERS KEEPING.

SzUI 3316In ftsU@0 = Neet sN4s
-. Paoinc Condennstion suits-A RE-
ss1slsrant witness Fined-New suits
.-YsderaI Court BIottsr.
Nsffher Judges Humes nor Stratton APP
sssed Is their courtrooms yesterday, and
.1ronentIy all the work to be done fell
q Iuiee Lichtenberg. who has as yet taken
I = yneation-
ms. KxxTzLER's cHILDREN.
1,nIpufv Sheriff Frank Revere, who was
- & hunt up Joseph Kenfxler. the man
-.ss,-,d s. his divorced wife of kidnaiing
r ~, 10 minor children, in Butte City.
s N1ak. % July I3 succeeded in finding his
-. ond locating the whereabouts Of the
{ $1,000 Yesterday morning. The father.
8 ~, and mother. with their attorneys,
-,e into court in the afternoon ct 4
<isoek 10 appear before Judge Lichtenberg
= arrange for the custody OF the children
S.tII saturday morning at $50 o'clock. at
~xseh time the writ of habeas corpus
srvxed on Mr.. Ken.zler was made return
tn father with the two little tots. and
v.ars 81 age respectively. came into
eonrf ! few minutes before O'Clock. and
ssSouf len minutes later the mother and
-. rairchild. who has taken her case in
h.rd. entered the room. Mrs. Kentzier
- sery nervous, and catching sight OF
children BIZ the side of their father she
! Ssikrd rapidly to them. and kissing them
s. -.srkesl up the Youngest, the little girl.
- ,ressin4 her to her breast she hid from
5 - the mothers tears that welled from
kfeses.
ysraI attorneys took advantage OF the
.en,rt convening to introduce motions in
6loss rkeviously brought up. and thus il
~ half hour was consumed. during
Shjch time Mrs. Ken'zIer had recovered
A,r,eIf and gathering the children about
- Va fondling and talking pleasantly to
NJ. 4. Burleigh, who appeared as attor-
~ for Kentxler, asked the court to grant
m client the CUSTODY of the children until
Sc silt Of habeas corpus issued the day
pvesious should be returnahle. The conn
- for the mother stated that II the oppos-
- counsel would be personally response
- ior the appearance in court of the chill
IA Saturday morning and would agree
II Mrs.. Kentxler could visit her children
6yusv evening between the hours of and
o'elock. be would not object to the stipu-
hlion Of the motion. The attorneys as
aunting, the court ordered II as stated.
NEW SUITS FILED.
o. November 10. 1889. James Dignan
c1nins In new suit filed, that himself and
lanes Spur. who is made defendant en-
Ind Into . written contract, by the terms
q which the plaintiff was to manufacture
~ Spur 10000 good mercantile brick.
md vas to receive therefor, upon delivery,
rs per 1000. The plaintiff alleges that be
l(livefed, - per contract. 267 .302 bricks,
which. according tosgreement. were worth
G47460, and that the full number or
hicks would have been delivered had not
EpuFr refused to accept any more, and that
b nov refuses to pay for what ne did re-
GINA The plaintiff alleges that owing to
ne breaking of the contract on the part OF
~ defendant he has been damaged in tbs
nm q $795s62, which amount, together
piih The sgrecd price of the brick to the
1omber deIlypred. be asks Is Judgment.
Y Charles LAngert has filed papers in suit
nfalnst w. n Kasiska ard G. A. Stewart
1orsoover from them 81 500, the value Of
ptomissory note which il claimed the
Attendants issued to the plaintiff for val
unhle consideration January last.
For another and separate cause OF action,
~ plsintih AYERS that the defendants
iasued to him another promissory nots.
involving $500, January 25 last. In both OF
tie notes the defendants promised to pay
u amount named on their faces for value
feceIved, but the plaintiff AYERS that MP to
dats be has received not even an install
nent. and asks judgment in the sum of
$2Qo0 and interest at the rate of 10 per
cnk per annum.
Ihs Washington Iron Works Company
~ plaintiffs In . suit against the Black
msn Brothers to recover from them, for
value reteived. the sum of 81 .53627. The
Plaintiffs claim that the defendants issued
p them their promissory note on two sep
rate occasions, one for $30696 and
Ne other for $500, each Of which they
promised 10 redeem ninety days after
date Also that on April last the de-
delivered In the sum of $729, which has not
hen paid-the shortages recorded aggre-
eesag the amount of judgment asked.
Day Bros, the loggers. complain that on
0cfobef ., 1889. Thomas O. Lindsay.
THOMAS E. Drew and j. r. Gleason, issued
g tnem their promissory note. in which
Iney were to pay ninety days after date,
<9A6 The complainants aver that the
mount has not been paid and they ask
fogmens IN the sum named and SIS addi-
scnal As attorney fees.
AN ATTACHMENT SUIT.
Caarles Louch. as complainant in an at
.cnment suit against the firm of Phillips
- wash. alleges that the defendants has
purchased groceries and provisions worth
elaN The plaintiff sets forth that the
osof has not been louidated. and judgment
= asked In the amount of the bill.
FOR RIeHT-oF-wAY.
he Portland g. Puget Sound Railway
Oompany have commenced suit in the
supsriof cour; for right-of-way along the
e'ass 10 Portland. The company asks for
eontinuous strip of land 100 feet wide,
80 papers in separate suits have been
s'sa making the following named persons
ss'sndants: W. s. Ladd. Belle Amunds,
:. 4. Smith. Alfred smith, Field & Smith,
e n Walker, Lettie Caroline Allen, b.
VI WE. X Talbot S. Schwabacher, Peter
!, ".'ekstrom. William II. Hughes, David ~
.1agnes, Il. Phillips, T. Hail, Clin-
n w. Z Ferry. infant children of Ellen
- na george d. Hill. w. +. Epier. W. C.
Ssqs.fe, Charles F. Murphy. E. lockwood,
~ y Anaiyold, Emma Z. Adams, G. Miller,
= =. uoegun, 7. Higgins, w. ]. Blackwell,
:. whitney. Kate r. whittlesey. G. Mas