Evening journal. [volume] (Wilmington, Del.) 1888-1932, 1890-12-02

"On Saturday | made proposal TO Mc-
Carthy 70 let Gladstone. Harcourt and
Morley give him letters declaring that In
the event Of the return OF the Liberals to
n9wer a plan of home rule will be proposed
"a which the control Of the constabulary
will be vested in an Irish executive, re-
sponsible to an Irish parliament, which
will also have powers TO settle the land
question. Mr.. Mccarthy went to Mr..
Gladstone and made these proposals, with
my assurance that il these concessions
were made / would retire from public life.
Mr.. Gladstone has replied that he will not
hold anv communication with me as leader
Of the marty fMr. Mccarthy, No, no ,
The same proposals were placed Nefore
Harcnurt. who replies that under no cir
cumstances will he give any promise what
ever. now or hereafter. to any Irish party.
Remember. Harcourt rs 30 be your leader
when Gladstone dies The same man hns
declared that bis limits Oh home rule are
Chamberlain's scheme of local govern
ment
Excloded from the Promised Land.
III Harcourt ever comes into power he
will give you local government and plenty
Of coercion know what Harcourt will
do for you, what Gladstone win do, and
what Morley will do. know there is not
q single one OF she lot to be trusted unless
you trust yourselves. II ] am TO leave you
tonight should like 10 leave you IN Sc
curity. II is not a fair thing 20 me 20
ask me TO see you within sight OF the
promised land, that I should come with
you, having come so far until you are alb
soiutely sure Of Ireland and can 70 no
further Enthusiastic eheerlng)
McCarthy visit 20 Gladstone.
Mn. Mccarthy followed MP. Parnell.
He explained his visit TO Mr.. Gladstone
Mr. Gladstone told him that be regretted
the Differentiation OF the Irish party, but
be could not regard him as representing
the party. and therefore could not treat
with him. He would offer no suggestion,
sign no document give no message 70 be
conveyed to the party. He said be could
not give any document with any certainty
that il might not be printed by some one
OF those concerned.
Mr.. Mccarthy also saw Sir w HaTconrt,
who did not say that he would not make a
promise Of any kind TO any Irish member,
but simply said that IN view Of Mr.. Par
nells manifesto he would not give any
body, verbally or ia writing, assurances
which were to be brought 10 the notice OF
Mr. Parnell As 20 the general question
OF AIR. parnells retiring, Mr.. Mccarthy
said the leading error had been his tPar-
nell's) keeping private until now the Tia.
warden conversation.
The O'Shea Case Not in order.
DIR. Parnell said IN reply u am perfect
" willing 10 admit the blame, but ! am
glad that have told il all now, before the
| full mischief was done.
Without final action the meeting al.
| journed until this noon, During yester-
days proceedings Mr. Parnell ruled ont Of
order any reference 10 his conduct ia the
OiShea case. This brought him into FIRE
uuent collision with the speakers, notably
Mr.. Healy The debate WIS at times very
acrimonious.
A Quarrel with Healy.
Mr. Parnell himself put a motion 10 al.
/ journ and declared that the yeas had il
without calling for the nays. Mr.. Healy
protested, but Mr.. Parnell declared the ad.
| journment carried. Mr. Healy moved THAI
| Mr.. Mccarthy take the chair tCheers)
Mr. parnell--I have not left The chair.
Mr. Healy Then put the question.
After more remarks MIR, parnell again
put the question on adjonrnment. ma
jority seemed in favor OF continuing th,
debate and Mr. parnell said the discussion
must proceed But il soon becoming evi
dent that IL was impossible 70 transact
business. tile meeting adjourned