Los Angeles herald., 1890-05-30
ORDER DIRECTING ABSENT. DE-
PENDANTS TO APPEAR,

TN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED
i States, Ninth Circuit, Southern District of
California.
Manuel Jesus Gables, complainant. vs. James
A. Glrard, Joaquin Soto, George w. Hearst
Dolores Diaz Menesses Adolfo CarrascO
Aibano Elisha W. Howe, Louis. NJ Girard,
RICARDO j. Bulge and the State of California
respondents.
No. 166 in equity.
fran ~ appearing to the satisfaction OF the court
NJ. Girard, Dolores Diaz Menesses and AdoIfo
Carrasco Albano, defendants in the ahovS
entitled suit are not citizens OF the state Of
Callfornla and cannot be found therein. and
are not inhabitants of and cannot be found in
salo southern District of California and that
non none o. them will Voluntarily appear there's
ana IT further appearing to the satisfaction of
the court from the amended bill of complaint
that RICARDO J. Bulge has departed from the
OF is not an inhaban OF the
iound therein and will not voluntarily appear
IN sald SUIT and 1t further appearing that this
n sun Is oro1gn5 10 enforce claim to and to re-
within said Southern District of California. con
slstlng OF the land and claims of the complain
ant In the above entitled bill:
1t is therefore ordered and directed that tho
following named defendants, who are absent
from, rom are ar not not inhabitants of, and cannot be
1ounu IN SAID southern District of California
VIZ Louis NJ. Girard, citizen of France and
whose residence is to the complaint nt in the
above-entitled bill unknown; Dolores DiaS
Menesses, citizen of the Republic of Chill ana
a resident of Rancagua in said Chill: Adolfo
Carrasco Albano, formerly a citizen of the Ra'
pupnc OF Chill and a resident of Santiago in
SAID Chill, but whose citizenship and residence
IS now to the said complainant unknown:
Ricardo J. Bulge, citizen of the state of Cali
fornla resident of San Francisco, in said state.
but who has lately departed from said state and
whom the complainant is informed and believes
IS now in the Republic of Chill; and each of
tnem 40 appear, plead, answer or demur in said
sult by the 7th day of July, 1890; and that this
oruer be served on each of said defendants if
practicable, wherever found, by delivering a
copy thereof, together with copy of the bill of
complaint, each certified by the solicitor Of
complainant to be correct copy at least
twenty days before said 9TH day OF July. 500
SUI, such service to be made by such persons as the
s1 soiicdtor OF Complainant may choose and to he
proved by the affidavit of any person serving
the same, and that for the service of this order
upon any absent defendant or defendants upOr
@h9m ah3n personal service thereof is not practi-
cable, copy OF this order, certified to be cor
rect by the solicitor of mplainants. be pub
Ilshed in the Los Angeles HERALD a daily
newspaper published at Los Angeles, in the
for six consecutive weeks before the 9TH day of
July, 1890; and it is further ordered that in
case any of such absent defendants shall not
appear, plead, answer or demur within the
time limited by this order or within such fur
ther time as this court may allow and upon
order, and of performance of the directions
herein contained, this court will entertaip
jurisdiction of said suit and will proceed to the
hearing and adjudication thereof in the same
manner as If each of said absent defendants had
been served with process within the Southern
DiStrct of California, but said adjudication
VIII, as regards said absent defendant or de-
1enoants who may not appear in said suit.
affect only the property and rights which are
the subject of said suit which are under the
jurisdiction of this court.
Dated May 18th, 1890,
ROSS, District Judge
J., | certify the foregoing to be correct copy of
the original NOBLE HAMILTON
Solicitor and of Counsel for the Complainant.
ma27-tu6t