New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1890-12-17
THE COURTS.
corRT OF APPEALS DECISIONS.
,x,rn Dowy BY BACH DIvISIoN-cAsE
.RGrgp-A NEW CALENDAR


Albany Dec l6.-In the First Dl'isioh - v'v Oo,u.
| Of Appeals to-day the following u'''''"0
| down: ,o pooplc,, Rapid Transit
conn,ny appellant, to acquire hIuG ~ 81 % r ds;
etc. tr EqItaoe - MARY Anna Hughes, ct a.. re-
st1' 81 The same appellant AZ kooert a. Vy Phshe'
re pondcnt, Huldah H. C!aPp, asa'N' 0'r''
CT d. ~ az rel Orson r. COOK respondent agt.
samuel " smith a. eo'aI aSpsant, aSt. Alnet f.
"a [S A. 9o{poratlon Counsel. rcspouenV, N rc, pS
, Nar,heret Gibbons TO Nacac an uses h i
uton Cl irn Ityngs;on respondent, AT the New
| Yori Elevated railroad COMPANY 81 ~; "'po''"''
OlVfF W Wn,"v ct al respondent, ast Charles f.
Walker and Joseph {. White appe a. 'v .Hs md
Moey ct al repSHde nec lam John SchencS ap
h o,,o a a MATTHEW Mar respondent Appeal dis
',o ea,g VIZ TicEer respondent as Emory w. Ab-
ho,t limited etc. appellant. Order OF General Term
| affirmed and judgment absolute o'D' r'''''''''
wl Peter Miller and Barbara Miller his WIFE esp @tI
cnts aEt. the New ORR h Iarrict FED rcspondcnt
Ssfa GCm %s% iofR Lake Tc wee aoad
t ,T p.,nted Nth costs abide the event
The Marine Bank Of buffalo. respondent aet i ono
Butler C0ep ,s 9'Tec $ Wheeler a, executor etc:
appellant: David A. flthan asN ii,t
Th G'trien respondent aet Patrick Harden, APP
pean John II. Maftcnh0h resP3nIem' AZ
respondent ag george whcalc as ex , , ctc;
appellant: Hugh d. Kelly, respondent asoi r",,opd
WI AT John Cah appellant; Adam Lamb, respond
cnt ait John Mccamphill. appellant AdHn y Ndnr
rrsoondcn AIT John Boehm, appellant ira o. MiliI
rrcS,,omdent AIT Nancy b. Wheeler. mpld. win
Josephine Michael appellant Ira g. Mfr
appellant: Ira O. Miller. HSPondent ngI Nah'y Ia "a
Wcclcr imph with sarah stlllwel appgantI Ip LI
% ,5 MI Flro Toa 9ppeii5t Ira D. Miller respondent
al Nancy B. wh M mr@ Th f ast i Yaacy T.
Wheeler. lmpld. with Jane Mulvan-y, apprlaainI,;
another appellants Ellen >pauldnf r'iona.cn,, AZ
Marquis l. Kcycs and ot"r,, appciau,- Nrlgn, ~,
POST respondent at the Mnnhatan Ea"a ,I C"@Pan
ATT Aaron Field and others, appellants -aihu'
Lyman and other appclIan' as' EoGr,Ci NoPp tSc
Household sewing Machine Company. appellant az
M'T IrI Ec@ a s5dior iu a PIKE sc New Eo Lake E
and Western Ear .ad COMPANY. appellant; '''',
llr,ch. rpondrnt, art the N@y l"rt ana "f'"TJ'' '
Lake Railroad company, appellant. th"r'N J '",
son respondent. ae'. Llc Broadway aG ,olcu.u "N'
Traders National Bank Of New YORK. Responded at
Henry burg and other appellants gonh h ,,iy
9gt hc Dry po-A L,'i ,goaG%"y H4 l ls ''''''
The following cases were a-sucd In the f''t
Division:
George +. Nash rcspord,rt at tho Ncw York Gen
tra ana nus ID EN'r hu'in ''.p',', npi' ,,t
Jane, Av'ul; r. end an tt"ri rgp'n'I =. r a
frederick %.,,' appellant ar' thr Dover Furnace
and Iron Company ana another. respondent.
Char'c> Cleveland. respondent ast the Nc"'IerS'y
john r,un.e,d appellant. at. Edward rrommeT
roi!oVins !, Oh. DAY calendar f,r tomorrow: Sos.
! 500. IO1l, 800, J0l. BOT, 81. 80 and 'i'.
fl TIE second DIV, oa tpdAj ;a5 io.io"In- decisions
wer. handed down:
,.llani, at thc r. ard coun@,' Valley Railroad
COMPANY. ct al. respondents. Mot 'n 10 al I'D"
rmltu;ur from the supreme Court doalcd. with $40
Dwight johnson ct a. appellants. and r.p'nac.nt.
act. to- shelter bland Grove AID ttnp N"ctins $50
c.a-- respondent and appellant Motion i'' N-iF-"
MI -,rnl-i. with $40 c.,-i-
A. sug,Iyi,, ,sr'ii'nr ,.tc ct al gcspoudeut, Jgfs
mrnt %; general icru reversed. Ard judgment -
JG-,,n j. La. ct al. ar,~ilants. at charles J..
Won~:ei. " a.. ir-rtf n'-. Ami" u Ja'",'I' AZ
am j. Nue,. rsp'nd" Z, At. AcAaiHcr T. 'h''"''''
appellate Judgment aHliI'l. win f'-l,.
ia|iaa, ..,! -. ,e.I i.4.-.ud company. appclla
Jud ,.l,t I'D aid nc~ tri r7Ahi'~i, with COST 20
E!a.u Dean. 'priao'. ara'n.t TIE AmcT.can Lg -,
and I.irt 'FIpt't. iHpd' r''' I''l,''''' . =,
A.. t,i,i c.f rI..,e.d 80 rs 9, oI,uGc That ~" DC
, f,.a.u' E-.urt ~ Wnirnl" o.. ara Do" h"0hv is. ..
;,d {" i.1'.JS qs'r u" ,'g i' c,.,
i.- -a, bonds tud -..-k o: ft" -'t"r ir MINIS ~
.a..- - ta" .''' i H "H 10. renGr. % ,,e
certificate o.; ,-' ', a' w ''T ~
c,l4v.. tY tie p.niuflf t".h i'tn %" d. hi"-i'.
80 '.aa. al ,,r'.,i. :pr $500 ''a''- ot ~" -" :
Pr ,r-..t ,,.... ,..'. ~ r. ,pVc,. - c.'h"r p1-''
Z The following c.e, ve,c o.to.N a o." second
G.e.us
The x,'n~l Tale wa-r. c.mJa'5. respondent
J Urlr Na....r. sopY.iout "-"'-i JACOB hup
PC ,.,o.eS sgi '-r rep ne,n' aeoo.. the nrotiyI
,.l Ling l-l..l Ca'i. hallway COM 'uN. 'rpri'' =
u.t,' iHr. r.nirt'. "-4.' j'.n h"n,i
.. ,.c,.t DIVISION y OBJ, clf, - appeal. t. dal
f,Ib.1 'lc 90 r.n..>.-. u ~. calendar ~ l---
..ff D. u.,r I. !.