Indian chieftain. [volume] (Vinita, Indian Territory [Okla.]) 1882-1902, 1890-09-18
LEGAL LORE.
Cooweescoowee Circuit Court
A Long Docket.

for the possession OF mnie valued al
SI25 and $500 damages. Verdict in IA
vor of plaintiff for the mule and sl0O
damages. Appeal taken
J,:H. Akin vs.. Jane Rogers et.al.; in
plea of debt on a note Of nand Yer
dict for plaintiff for three-fourths OF
amount claimed
II. C. Shufeldt VS.. Jerry Butler;
suit for trespass and possession OF an
improvement erected on legal quarter
OF mile limits of plaintiff. Dismissed
at Plaintiffs cost.
Carrie Thompson vs. J. Z. Thomp-
son; suit for recovery OF part Of estate
Of Martin Thompson. Continued.
D. z. Mcdaniel, administrator, VS..
sue ~ Adair; suit for possession Of
old Improvement Of f. b. Mcdaniel
valued ct 81 ,5C0. Placed on heel OF
docket.
Mary A. Barker VS. Mary Covel
H0lderman; suit for possession Of an
improvement valued at 500, located
on Russell creek. Dismissed al plaint-
IFS cost
Nancy Galcatcher IS. Opheiia Walk
ingstick; suit for possession of an i'm
provement valued al 500 and another
improvement valued at 500. Verdict
for plaintiff. Appeal taken.
W. E. Roberts VS.. Ed Byrd and L. ".
Marks; suit for possession Of 1000
I feet OF walnut timber valued at $500.
Verdict tor plaintiff for $40. Motion
for an Appeal filed.
Lizzie BOwlin IS. Joseph Hunt; suit
for an improvement on Pryor Greek.
Dismissed on motion and appealed by
plaintiff on rule of court.
R.M. Allen vs.. Jno L. Ball; suit for
an improvement on Big Creek. With
drawn by mutual consent.
Susie I. Mayes IS. John ". Mayes;
suit for divorce and aiimOny. Dis
missed at plaintiffs cost; motion for
an appeal entered.
Beatrice A Markham, administrA-
trix vs.. Polly Archer ct al; suit for
two-thirds Of an improvement belong
to estate Of Nancy AlheTiy. Stricken
from docket
Susan Bowles vs-Cieorge Vann .et. al:
suit for possession Of an improvement
in Cooweescoowee district. Name Of
George Vann stricken from case as not
being interested. Continued for want
of time.
Mary Flanagan VS.. 4. H. Nagcs, sd-
ministraiOr; suit for possession of two
thirds Of the property belonging TO the
estate or sarah Naggs. Continued by
mutual consent.
J. G.. Brateher rs. Wm. u. Smith
and wife; suit for part Of an improve
ment situated on Panther creek. Dis
at Plaintiff 5 cost on account Of bond
in case not being made on. before the
clerk as the laE directs.
J. NJ. Beard VS.. d. L. Denny: suit
for possession OF an improvement To-
Gated in the town Of Claremore. Judg-
ment rendered in favor of defendant.
Appealed.
J. r. Mcclellan vs. Abe Crittenden;
suit for possession Of improvement
located on the legal quarter Of a mile
limit Of plaintiff. Dismissed on ae-
count Of minority Of plaintiff, at his
cost.
A c. Cunningham vs.. Charles
Haynes et-al-; suit for possession Of an
improvement Continued for want Of
time.
J. L. Mizer rs. Ned Taylor: papers
not served.
Nick Rogers vs. Houston Rogers et. |
al; suit for possession of Improvement
located on the quarter Of mile limit of I
plaintiff. Bond not filed by plaintiff /
and d ismissed al his coss.
+. "A. Nelson VS.. John Ward and /
wife; suit for the possession of an i'm
proveDent located en- the quarter OF a /
mile limit Of plaintiff. Continued for
want Of time.
Charles Reeves VS.. Bessie Reeves;
suit for divorce. Case dismissed st
plaintiffs cost and molten for an ap-
peal taken.
Susie T. Mayes vs.. John W. Mayes;
suit for $50. Continued for want OF
time.
Sarah Gage vs.. G. w. Talbert; pa
pers not served.
Bert Holderman vs.. Tom Rogers;
suit for possession Of an improvement.
Papers not served.
John Sarcoxio VS.. PAti-a-caw; suit
for divorce Confessed judgment BY
Joe Bennett, defendants attorney.
Jane Adams, administrators, rsE.
Mayield and wife; suit for $40. with
Interest on $40 from January 2i, lSSS,
until paid and 500 from August 30.
1887 until paid. Dismissed at plaint-
IFS cost on account Of there being no
bond
Luelia Rsines vs. Joseph Raines;
suit for divorce. Papers not served
Virginia Ford VS. s S. Ford; papers /
not served. d
John Beard VS. ". Cox; suit for SIC5
With interest. Papers not served.
Richard Downing vs. Lizzie Downing:
suit for a divorce. Dismissed for want
1f prosecution.
Jesse Rowe vs John Lynch; suit for
N improvement on Rock creek. Con- 1
timed for want Of time. {
Minerva WhitmOre vs. William No /
bic; suit for possession Of improve
nent. Papers not served.
Patti Lena Washington VS. George ,
" "ashingion; suit for divorce. After q