The sun., 1890-03-30
mission he would like to make @ few remarks
on lhat sublect. Ho said:


Tho statement desire to make Is the bald plain
statement that of all the reform. that were instituted
question OF the roarrangeent Of the aurtoneers bust
me- oe hs U whc S ] did hs @Hs 1s
endorsement OF tho bar at the conclusion OF his ter OF
NJ lvns 10th Of whom are somewhat familiar with
case where - claim I was preferred against the goods
was subsequently gwen in favor of the claimant that
the verdict was not for ye and ten tunes the amount
was made and the admi ini.tration of the office in the
not OF ID Which the paTs
to the suits have NOT agreed to accept the figures real
Now the effect Of that as th that Of the 81 +sIo0
81 ma MT Topping sA S LIVED no 10 turned m
Kgnts by that reform and bya change In former times
execution or the process Of the seized upon goods
when claim waI made nine caseS out Of len he sur,
SherinS sale the goods were s1crihesd tsy wSrS
esnsr%y to give back shout ten Or Twelve times whst
he had recovered since Mayor GrAnts change in the
ssd on the ira. @ sSss SS' i what o Got rss
there i no, snTo W sxcepSoa % to IL % hat Since % that
change has been made 81 oooooO have been saved
goods sssd
s1 ns
81 sGeTG m sale ~ !. bH, 10 aTgsr % Of the goods EGGrSe
Years arr during Nr GrSnsS term aI the asoreU rssted a"
4 SS f fhon . Of ANY * sS na
G s So 10 inc RSFs .s i i1SS GTSuS
s
% % . S a 'f E's
sp Of .Hsp there ssl sts by amy %
no charge By an AuctOnesr. There can bs a
Ssfsd in % that s. rem
v Ss9PsS eng TO s ssa ThS that he
The thing. hat The parties have to settle are only as
person has right into court now and say that
10 knew ne rses were there el.e he Ght have
sSS not 10 tax on s eS b hsas :.
,@S .sTySS C nat sb,;r OsS
III II. % e S
tne sherhs the method OF rs conduct was the sher
.slavlnI sd moi only lawn! II every TssP:c 6St
ws %S !si %Sy :S:aa 'TS. Es d;a. sS:
Nj; rootran-lle shera rendered the service which
S6srlns arr.ngsmen.. with h. smPIoyss, t6s aus:
sanls Sap M Gn s4s o1 10
re Al q ETi.onsr. proceeded on .hs basis
or four or nve ten lines what ho actually paid for
@ COST smshns @ rGns SSa H. X:
service y pad for How he chooses. to pay his en-.
NJ Fassett-Then YOU Justify ~
Mr Bosrdman-WA it not tho duty OF the Sheriff As.
,SminE thAs i Tas nsessary for him to have an Aue
possible IN the interests OF tho people for whom he
Mr. Oockran-So sir. there is no such duty on tho
Shenh. These questions prsBuppoEe Ignorance
of the sher Office The Sheriff the agent OF the
person who invokes tho process OF the law he bound
to hts commands, lie IL under his control Ills services
are question of contract where he outside Of his
gsiutorY duties and he 10 entitled to get what ho can
for speci service that ho may render ou have
the shern may exact outside Of that whatever does
Is a matter of contract
Mr., boardman-And he is under no duty according to
your notion 10 get the service of aucuonSor upon
most reasonable terms posAibleF
Mr.. COCHRAN lie cannot employ Auctionser or
AM body else liz must act himself through hia own
empoyce. When that man ia called an Auctioneer he
his act and he has night to be for Il
Senator FaBsett-l understand Mr. Cochran theory
get what he can.
Mr.. COckran-Not exactly. II he uses any coercion
that Is eNtOrton Whatever he does outside his stat
liory duties for the benefit OF party. In the exact
AnEuaRs of thesr couTtG what he for the benen
contract between them which Is moi only legal, but
hat Il any party here OF any OF those gentlemen
Mho 80 testified made Such an agreement with tue
sheriff and no had his Auctionesr and through the
,ucuoneer, he mantAinod his levy and he, acting
through the Auctioneer sOld In this particular form
md had contract for the compensation and II he
lsysr gave the auetioneer dollar, he could tax .
etysC that y ths question here and mot the method in
Tho counsel INDUCED In a long wranRIs