The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1890-06-19
WAS SEEN TO KISS MRS. LEE.
SUGAR BROKER WANzoR DEFENDING
Il DIVORCE SUIT
HE son Gives Important Testimony for the
Wife - Tho Correspondence Husband,

| HE Son Gives Important Testimony for the
wife - Tho Correspondents Husband,
Frank ID. Lee, Also TestInes In tho Case.
| Testimony was taken yesterday before Judge
| Van Wyck, In the City Court. Brooklyn, in the
suit OF Mrs. Sarah E. Wanzor for an absolute
divorce from Moses G. Wanzor. The defendant
is sugar broker OF Wall street. The wife tes-
titled that she was married in 1862. and that she
first heard OF her husbands relations with the
Correspondent, Mrs. Emile l.. Lee. In 1889 from
Frank d. Lee, her husband. She asked Mr.
Wanzor about 1t in Mr.. Lees presence and he
did not deny the intimacy. She said she never
melted her children to insult their father.
Didn't you send your daughter with a cow
hide to his Office with instructions to make
scene there ?" asked Mr.. Wanzors counsel.
mo, sir" Mrs Wanzor promptly replied.
Harry I. Wanzor, a son OF the couple. tes-
titled that no saw his father hugRing and kiss
ing Mrs. Lee at the country house OF the Wan
zors at Islip. He had also seen his father act
Ing affectonately toward Mrs. Leo when MIR.
Wanzor was boarding at her house. 10S Macon
street. Brooklyn. The witness had also seen
his father at 2S3 State street. where Mrs. Lee
has been living since her husband left her. On
the youns Mr. WanSoE add
had kissed her himself as often as fifteen times
O day.
Other Witnesses t6SElHPu 10 having seen
Wanzor In the MACON street house. and later
In the State street house where Mrs. Lee lived.
Mre. Remington testified that she rented the
dwelling in State street to Mrs. Lee. and that
Mr. Wnnzor was surety on the lease. William
H. Herbert. who eoped with one OF Mr.. Wan
zor's daughters. testified that he served tho
papers in Mrs. Lees suit for divorce. At the
time OF the service Mrs Lee was playing the
piano and Mr., Wanzor stood beside her smok
respondent said he left his wife whom he dis
covered evidence to convince him Of her rea-
lions with Mr.. Wanzor. He admitted having
received clothing from Mr.. WnnzOr. but no
said he never got any money from him. He
admitted he hau written to MIR. WanZor apollo
gizinG for the charges he had made against
him and Mrs. Lee.
OF shoes2 ?"
He once offered me a pair, but couldn't
wear them They were too large"
Alfred l.. Foster mutual friend, who Ia now
on visiting terms at Mrs. Lees house, testified
that he had been Il frequent visitor at the
Macon street house when the family consisted
of Mr.. and Mrs, Lee Mr.. Wanzor. two children,
Wanzor continued boarding at the place. The
witness had heard Mrs. Leo reading her hus-
band affectionate letters aloud and ridiculing
them as she read Foster admitted that his
wife still visited Mrs. Lee. and when he was
asked II he believed the charge against the
correspondent he said:
Il couldn't believe that Mrs. Lee was a bad
woman"
LAWYER Ridgway moved to dismiss the case
on the ground that tho plaintiffs evidence wac
not strong enough to warrant Il decree Of
divorce Judge Van Wyck denied the motion.
and gave the defence until Tomorrow to pre-
pure its side OF the case.