New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1890-10-07
TIE TIPPERARY TRIALS POSTPONED.
THE cFRTIFIc>TE OF MR.. O'MAHOSYS PHYS1
CLANS NOT ACCEPTED AS A VALID EX-
CISE EOE HIS ABsENCE.

Dublin oct 1.-THE maci,tratc'S court at Tippei"'rv
before which the Of M">,r>. Dillon and "I;r"
and number Of Other dcfcida;> who charged VII!
CONSPIRACY l. being heard cconvrn"d thi- morning Al
The accused with the exception Of Mr. pMah"ny. vh'
is H. were p',cnt hu, their counsel Mr.. E''im"ld
and Timothy IIcaly. absent in consequence "'
All important engagement witch c"mandi 'h"i'
present cl>cvhc5c. ON behalf of Mr. CMahoHv VII
Dillon produced '"r'in' It"> from w" Clonnle G'!''
stating tha, h" snrIrSly III and that it Wa IN
possible ior hlrn 70 attend the trial
Mr. Roman. prosecutor for the Crown, objected II
the certificate, not being valid excuse for ONt
hony'> absence and insisted thai the doctor, lie 'un'
moned by the testify TO their patient, con
dtion.
Mr. Dillon said that the doctor>' certificates would
have to be accepted evidence that Mr.. pNIhpny
was In no condition 10 appear brorr Tho court the
doctor, Themselves distinctly refused 10 com" 20 court
10 sab, ,rn,ia, The statements they hav" already made
in :!clr CCrtIiCI:c>
Mr. Roman then ASKED IN" court 10 aGjpIrn for m
hour To- enable the to dccG" whether tLr charge
AGAINST O'Nahrny would he withdrawn or an a,IIica
ton mad" 70: warrant fo' hi' aFI"~t.
Mr.. O'Brien who Wa not plra>rd with III" pro
pect for adjournins the fo: hoIr. a>ked Mr.
ROuan: "Can not decide TIL, matter ia half AN
hour. and not keep uS fooling around hc:"2"
The court granted The request OF Mr.. Eonan and ~
ad iOnri.mcnt taacn Tor an h"u. l"n Tie rci>.
semhhnc f II" court Nr. Roman stated tla' Tn. pioc
n t..c4I.pICG tJ two dO'
Gno>ting thcrI ,n examine ONah"ny. and had sent A
third doctor Tllr"r1rv ~ vi>f aud cNanin" the
defendant. lie expected tha: the doctors woud ap
ne,r in court l,'.r and TESTIFY 10 OMaIov'> com
dittu: aii he therefore asked that tl" conr, take a
further Adjournment.
In the cnur,c II his remarks Mr. Roman said tla:
ONahov through hi> solicitor. had placed the court
a, Gcfi1ucc rh~ remark excited the Indignation o,
Mr. Dill"i. who declared thar Mr. il InanS ststrncn:
was ui,iirc lie further said that II" had done hi>
Lc.- "a piu.ui the attendance OF Mr.. O'MahOry :
do'tor> IN court.
Mr. uInrc. sad That The defendants had the i1gh,
10 COMPLAIN against the 'Jn:,c %; the pro- ntp.
Mr. Romans rrnar!.. he 6cc Jared was 1!dr>-"d 10 Al
audience In Eheland aud designed To injure In,
defendants.
Mr.. O'Brcn> remarks were greeted with cries d
lIcar. hear" by the defendants.
4 of confusion now occurred. Hf. kona!
repeated h,> remarks and again. and Mr.. Dillon
who was extremely angry. loudly denied them. Th'
defendants In the meantime protested against th'
charges made nv the prosecutor
when Orc. again partially restored Nr. Dnlr
adjournment. lie maint3ned that IN justice II" war
rant could be issned for the arrest of Mr.. p'Mah"n,
until the court had hcari the testimony Of his doc'or~
Another heated wranelc then took place between IN
Crown prosecutor and Mr.. Dillon. The court finally
granted Mr. Romans request and further afjolrni"iI
WAS taken.
rhc action Of the defendants who bail +
nRev To rsult In their conimtal 10 the tlOnncl Jai
Tor contempt ot court