Telegram-herald., 1890-04-08

Mezaer1.l Exerois<s 81 hoaeF Of Justioe
<@APee1l-1E. psrxaHt tssc&a CAses-


The Eext term Of Ihe supreme Court
opens tomorrow, Chief gaSilos Champ
In presiding Al the opening Of TIE
court the resolutions adopted ~ the
t'4T ot the Stste al tie resent meeting
n Detroit upon .sae death Of the late
Judge Campbell, MI be presented and
appropriate eulogistie addresses made
by members of the h&F throughout tie
state, and by the &ssocl lstes Of the de-
ceased JufisE- A large attendance :
desired py tie court, and lt = hoped
that as many Ot tie members OF the
tai MI DC present frOa the western
part of the State Is possible. IL is prob
able that the exercises vii be preserved
by the lssulng OF a memorial contain
lng IN full the resolutions ana addresses.
The following cases % the calendar
Win their numbers, are OF interest 10
Western Michigan readers;
lS. The Common Council OF the Vii
lage Of Cedar Springs. complainant, ".
Bartholomew Schllch, appellant, and
another, defendants.
IA. Maud Kelley, by next friend
plaintiff, We. the Detroit, Lansing and
Northern Railroad Company, defend.
ant and appellant.
-. I'd 'Segar, plaintiff, We. the Mus
kegon River Single and Lumber Com
pany. defendant and appellant.
22. samuel Lyon, complainant and
appellant, VS.. Wlllsam {. Denison et a..
defendants.
"a. Edward l.. Phillips, plaintiff. "
Judson Freyer CT al, defendants and
appellants.
25. Edgar l.. Gray, plaintiff, VS.. sam
uel James, appellant and Defendant
35. Sarah b. klpp, plsintiff, vs.. lsaa'
+. Lamoreaux, defendant and appel
liant.
81. +. b. Miller Il Co, ia corporation
plaintiff, VS.. Charles l.. Olney et al.
| defendants and appellants.
3s. Adelmer u. Plumb, plaintiff anC
| appellant, VS.. the City of Grand Rap
| ids. defendant.
80. Cyrus J. Hood, plaintiff and ap
pellant, VS.. Frederick Ii. DIN, survivor
| etc, defendant.
40. William Keopke, plaintiff, vs.
Joseph p. Dyer, defendant and appel
| liant.
Il. John d. Hamilton. plaintiff, v;
William w. Powers and Charles "
Powers, defendants and appellants.
46 Horatio " Hovey ct al, plaintiff
VS.. James Cow, defendant and appel
lant
81. Francis King, plaintiff, VS.. Fran
CTS +. Bates, imp, etc, defendant an
appellant.
50. The township of Grand Rapids
| complainant and appellant, We. th
Kent County street Railway Compan
ct al, defendants.
go. Nels p Peterson, plaintiff, VI
William Toner, defendant and appe
liant.
81. Joseph Pulse ct al. plaintiffs, VI
The Petrie Lumber Company, defend
ant and appellant.
"a. Martha J. Kingman ct AL, con
plainants, VS.. julia II. Sinclair, defend
ant and appellant
l05. Emmett Hagadorn, plaintiff. "
the Stronach Lumber Company, defenC
ant and appellant.
LOG. Lizzie Rose, plaintiff and appe
liant, VS.. Herbert L. Page, defendant.
III. James I. Flaherty, complainant
VS.. Michael Moran, defendant and al
pellant.
100. The Kent County Agricultura
Society, complainant, VS.. Joseph Hous
man, defendant and appellant.
Hl23. In the matter of the assignmeI
Of Henry NJ. Goebel. The Old Nation!
bank ct al, appellees, VS.. Harvey 10
lin, assignee, appellant.
124. Henry {. Robinson et al, plan
tiffs, VS. Kornelius Mulder, defendal
and appellant.
I25. The Newaygo County Manufa
turing Company, plaintiff, VS.. Andre
Echtinaw, defendant and appellant.
l35. John Withworth, plaintiff, v
The Detroit, Lansing q Northern Rai
road Company, garnlshee, defendal
and appellant.
1856. Anna Moon, plaintiff, VS.. tt
City of Ionia, defendant and appellan
1877. The First National hank Of loni
Mich, plaintiff and appellant, VS.. WI
Steele, defendant.
1873. Charles Bateman, plaintiff ar
appellant, VS.. Philip Blake, defendsn
IA. Walter +. Tate, plaintiff and a
pellant, VS.. Eugene A. Hamilton, d
PENDANT.
153. The Traverse City, Kalkaska
Crawling Railroad Company. petluone
VS.. Richard A. Seymour et al, respo
dents and appellants.
l59. In the matter Of the estate
Alma j. Page, deceased, ATision
Cook, proponent and appellant. '
Laaden Winchester ct al, cont estant
1863. The People, plaintiff, y
James B. Grady, defendant and appt
liant.
10. The People, plaintiff. VS.. Pa
Alderman, defendant and appellant.
III. The People, plaintiff, v. A
drew J. Kridler, defendant and appe
liant.
l72. Casper y. Dunhsm and Frar
Treat, petitioners, vs.. Christopher
Hough, treasurer Of Barry county, 7
spondent.
l73. The People, plaintiff, vs.. &c
II. Brown, defendant.
Ia. The People, plaintiff, VS.. Geor
Goosman, defendant
175. The People, plaintiff, vs.. Geor
, GoOsmsn, defendant.
Omcers' Duty.