The Hawaiian gazette., 1890-06-03
S-rsns Court Of the Hawaiian
Islands april Term. 1890.
NaE1s KaHu " KANM, twl
ur-rN. UEy WAIVED.
--s-rS n ElCkEEToN. ,.


-t-S 81 action Of ejectment 10
49, a. undivided hSlf Of GER
- r-e,e u aSnd situsted in Msnoa,
TslE15 of 0zhu- beng ssme described
= R1vEl PEteuI No -, 70 MAkauln:
r. ulE1u1iF claims under s deed
sr--5 Al December. 1873. from hal
I-rlsula- Who inherited from his wife
KEu=ras- alias heko. she having IN
kz-zse5 Ero- her first husband, Ms
kE-ll- rhe pstsnIee-
rraa dad from hsihulsuls- there
E- z--z-Eusstion "a me Helu 10.
fr-z zlS1 No 45l Snd s certificate
z----s- II rhe margin. snd signed
Il kElzkzuz- Il the effect that the
---r-l lnszeo. was written by HIM
r1-h rhe consent and IN the presence
q kzz-1-lzuis sid IN the presence OF
kEhE z-5 PSiohzu-
K E---szrs from the daie OF the
fze5 En5 acknowledgement December
4 lS-S and ee-lhcste IN margin
Sz-sz Tacs-0s- g. 1913. that this IN
-s---uez-sun wEs made sitter the exc
r-uz1 u TIE deed This deed Is
.t5=-sa5 - bv defendant who inner
nd rhs u-hs- hzlf Of said land from
sd 1IEkz-lil- - which claim there
- 5ls-u-a- ny does the defendant
.zsS---= tbzt hz1ekos inherited one
~ ~ sid land from sSid Maksuln.
AE-z- czresal examination OF the
Esw E-5 E-rhc--r5es. 1 find that II on
-i,z r--g.51r-l1n Of an instrument II
E--sz-s O. have been altered. II Is IN
r-uts-- q The party offering Ii IN
szrl6Huc=- II explain the appearance
x Elrz-Erlu-- and the intent with
ELlcL z1a sheraton was made; that
-z--s- q fact 10 be ultimately
Ez6 ~ ne 5ury ID this esse by
~ C1--- upon proofs 10 De sd
11cs5 Is Ths psrTy Offering the IN
s----1s-- = evidence Inst docu-
us- = ~ Selected by is alteration
w. Us5s t-v consent u the parties,
sut=e-uz-r - Is execution What
1hsy nave zz5e they have S right 10
~
Il - E-rs-z--11 wEs INSIDE N the
c1-T=EE-cs. even sitter lis execution
~ deliver and for the benefit OF
-he c-z-1ss- i- r.-5s s-i,i * iz.o,'.eeigS
Ez -s +-zg ----s--. Il would be
Nd ms ! 81 6 matter Of proof
E-5 -1e b-rizl = on the plaintiff
Ezs Missy wEo wSs witness n
- czsa -ss-Ees positively 70 The
FAX 1Lz- Ee Zz1s The lnterlIneatlOn
81 E-1se The certificate II the msr-
- Ehe- Le wEs clerk n the land
o. q -Ls old Government build
5-E- -1E- Le did L 81 the request Of
Az-l1-zllZ he being present to
ST. u--L others. naming them.
sEE- q Ezs done because Il was an
Essz--a11Elt q the parties. IS they
51--E rEs- -Le deed did not cover
- u1e-1z-f @ TIE land described IN
RcEz- Patent NJ. Is This Is sup
p1-s5 by the evidence q several
El--z=sas- a. - the fact that when
EEl--E-z1lz returned from hsuai az
~ - Elss's 5esrh II 1873. he told
H. Ee lad co0e down for the pur-
po=e Il selling these lands 70 plain
- AID tLz- hs had done 50 There
= a. evidence thzt plaintiff. about
-zz- EZs- Q1t 3 usn On the land 10
c--EE-z Z fc- her on shares until
~ Ez-s- 49, diverted by the Gov
srZsul E1z- TIE land remained
z11c--p-z5 1--l shout three years
A. - defendant took possession
- IL Ind z15 lsassi Il 70 Chinese
~ rLst TIE plaintiff has proved
~ = Necessary . establish the
6z=5 E-5 -Eks L valid
L. 6sss-1E1t claims thai Kali
-l-z-E cc-Ll ~ inherit from hiswife:
~ -1sre vs. nothing definite IS to
~ 1sz-L u tLz1 SIZE had no legal
ks-s STRIVING be-. Certainly the
eEl1s-es = III ve-y strong on these
Fs-z1s- bz- ne have the evidence Of
ss=s-E- E-r-essas- that she. heko.
nd rLaz Ebel She vas living al
NJ E1-L kzr husband that she
Lz1 - zs-z-vss living. and that they
Ws-e e. 6ssd And the evidence
"a hE5lz1z1ls tod them his wife
Ezs did znd that VS. the reason he
60 hs-e e sci her lands snd re-
~ g. hEzE q i've He told Maria
kEkE -hsr L. VIE died II Deem
tz-- 81 sb01r one year before he
@s 11ED II December. 1873. the
-Uz u Zs5s tie dad
ErsFl1Zs = he Act Of June Srd.
~ IL husband co1ld not have IN
hzze5 E1y q MS Eife-s estate If
rh-s survived her. Esther OF mother.
q t-1-hzr q sister.
AK rhe Act q IS72-if the wife died
1sEv1cg s-z-1to-y heirs the husband
E0zI5 1hs1t only o1e-half Of his
Etss eSE-s- n this Csc one-fourth
q ~ lE1d described II Royal Pa
raE NJ ~ BIT the plaintiff claims
kE1ekoz dad iesTng 10 relatives
sz-E1El1E hsr. and therefore her
kzstsz15 Inherited the whole OF her
e-s- ! there sufficient proof Of
- i = NV seventeen years OF
21-s S1ce tie dsed Ess made, and
= Ezs zlezed that she was dead 1
1Ak z15sr The circumstances the
UoE I sEesnf 70 warrant the
o. \ Sn6s1g that ksili1lsuls in
H- -. -L-r.a - h. -