Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1890-05-08
SUPREME COURT.
IN BANK.
WEDSrSDAv Nov rfh

IN BANK.
WEDNESDAY, May It'll.
| Court met at 10 A. NJ
! Present: Beatty c. J. (presiding); Thsrnton. j.;
Sharpstein j.. Paterson, T.; Mcfarland, j.; Fox,
| j.; Spencer, Clerk; washburn, Bailiff.
People VS.. Koss-On motion of Seaman, or
dered that cause be placed on calendar and set
| for hearing on Monday next.
1S,2l9-Jones VS.. Duchow-On motion of Nicol.
appellant allowed twenty days to file brief re-
spondent twenty days to reply, appellant ten
days to reply thereto, cause to be thereupon
submitted.
20,65O-People vs. Christensen-On motion of
Attorney General Johnson, ordered submitted
on briefs on file
20,659, 2o,66l-People VS. McNulty People VS..
Chen Sing Wing-On motion of Attorney-Gen-
eral johnson, ordered continued for the term.
lS,465-McLean ct al. VS.. Crow, administrator,
etc-Pursuant to stipulation, ordered continued
for the term.
20,66S-People VS.. Bell On motion of Attor-
ney-General Johnson, and there being nc ap-.
pearance nor points and authorities on file for
the appellant, ordered that the judgment and
order herein be and the same are hereby af-
frmed.
1356S-Stratton vs. California L. & 7. Com
pany-Pursuant to stipulation, respondent al
lowed until June LIST to file brief, appellant fif-
teen days to reply, cause to be thereupon sub
mitted.
%, 446-People vs. Ahern-Pursuant to stipu-
lation, ordered continued to July calendar at
San Francisco
2062S-People VS. Nelson-On motion of An
derson, appellant allowed twenty days to file
brief, respondent ten days to reply, cause to be
thereupon submitted
2o6i2. 2o,6.6 People VS.. Howard, People vs.
Anselmi-On motion, continued for the term.
2O,6i4-People VS. Dickinson-On motion of
Attorney-General ordered that the appeal
from the order herein be and the same is hereby
dismissed.
13,4S0-Farrell VS.. Board of Trustees of Sacrs.
mento-Argued by Johnson and Church for ap-
pellant, Blanchard for respondent, and SUBJ
mitted. Counsel consent that Justices Works
and Thornton may participate in the discussion
of the cause.
Is, 769-Miner vs. Observation-Disclosures argued
by smith for appellant, Jones for respondent,
and submitted.
20.64s-People VS.. Tarn Poi-on motion, or
dered that respondent be allowed thirty days
to file brief, appellant thirty days to reply cause
TO be thereupOn submitted.
Il, 996-Callahan VS.. Warder--On motion of
Maddnx. ordered submitted on briefs on file.
O,167-People VS.. Turner-Argued by Raker
for appellant, Deputy Attorney General johnson
for respondent and submitted.
13 562-lShanklin VS.. Mcnamara ct al-Argued
by Hart for appellant, Craddock for respondent
Thornton and Works may participate in the
decision of this cause.
2O,645-People VS.. All Own-Argued by Hart
1or appellant, and further argument contip::
2O.674-People VS.. Hannon-Continued until
to morrow.
s0,6S9-People VS.. Ward-Continued until to-
morrow.
Adjourned until 10 A. NJ. tomorrow.
IN BANK
1861, 1l,757-Benson VS.. Shotwell, Moulton
VS.. knapp-Ordered heard in bank Beatty
e. J.
I2.4Sl, 12,37i-Munroe vs. Pacific Coast D. &
r. Company, Christy VS.. Spring Valley Water
Works-Pursuant to stipulation, ordered that
the submission herein be set aside and cause
stand submitted before the Court in bank, as of
February 10, 1880. Beatty, c. ].