The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1890-03-12

incite seditiOn and the commission OF
other crimes. The respondents did not
directly incite any persons to the COM
mission of crime other than lntlmida-
ton, but did incite to intimidation, and
the consequence was that crimes and
outrages were committed BY persons so
melted.
L" AS to the allegation that the respon-
dents did nothing to prevent crime, and
expressed no bona tide disapproval OF
crime, some OF the respondents-ln par
ticular Michael Davitt-did express
bona fide disapproval OF crime and out
rage, but the respondents did not de-
nource the system of intimidation which
led to crime and outrage, but persisted
in this abstention from denunciation with
| a knowledge of its effect. The respon-
| dents defended persons charged with
agrarian crimes, and supported their
| families, but it is not proved that they
| subscribed to testimonials for or were IN
timately associated with notorious Grim
inals.
" AS to the allegation that the respon-
dents made payments to compensate
persons who have been injured IN the
commission of crime, we find that they
did make such payments.
" AS to the allegation that the respon-
dents invited the assistance and cooper
alton of, and accepted subscriptions
and money from, known advocates OF
crime and of the use of dynamite, We
find that the respondents did invite the
assistance and cooperation OF, and ac-
cept subscriptions OF money from,
Patrick Ford-known as an advocate OF
crime and dynamite but it has not been
proved that the respondents knew tina,
the Clan-naGael controlled the Land
League, or was collecting money for q
parliamentary fund; but it has been
proved that the respondents invited and
obtained the assistance and co operation
OF the physical force party in America
including the Clan-na Gael-and, il
order to obtain that assistance, alb.
stained from regulating or condemnine
the action of that party.
Besides, there remain three specific
charges against Parnell personally, viz
"A.--That at the time of the kilmain
ham negotiations Parnell knew thai
Sheridan and Boynton had been organic
ing Outrages, and, therefore, wished
to use them to put down outrages. No
proved.
"B.-That Parnell was intimate will
leading Invincibles; that he prObabl,
learned from them what they were abou
when he Was released ON parole ii
April, 1882, and that he iv~s.....-. :. ~ =:
Phoenix Park murder as their handi
work. We find that there is no founda
ton for this charge, and that the Irwin
cibles were not a branch of the Lane
League.
"C.-That Parnell by opportune re
mittance enabled F. Bryne to escap,
from justice to France. We find tina
Parnell did not make any remittance t,
enable Byrne to escape from justice.
Regarding two special charge
a; q nst Davitt--that he was Fenial
and assisted in the formation of tn,
Land League with money contributes
for the purpose of outrage and crime
and that he was in close and intimat
association with the party of violence il
America, and was mainly instrumental
, in bringing about the alliance of tn
party and the Parnellite and Home Rul
party in America-we find it proved tina
Davitt was a Fenian and received none
from the skirmishing fund contribute,
, for the purpose of outrage. This Wa
| not, however, for the formation of tn
Land League itself but for the promo
/ ton of agitation leading up to it. w
find also that he was in such close an
/ intimate association with the party {
/ violence in America and was the ma
t mainly instrumental in bringing abou
the alliance referred to-