The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1890-03-19
THE SUPERIOR COURT
kochelle's IAborers' Suit For
Wages Heard.
The THREE COURTS N SESSION.


Ihe CO. II ,. JohEson asd osheu against n
4 koensl5e and The Front street cahle line wns
On triaa o<4oss Jnixs Iichsenherx ycssefsisy.
Inh = suit hFoaxhs for the collection 0f .
.AzaHce of wa<es asieged 10 b tns 70 b<tween
nsy and 6fFy lahesen from he defendant
noeneaie. vhe usa ssb~eonfsncsor for The cshss
eompeay- 4 iaxBe PAN Of the day ~ spent IN
ne sxszinstion IT witnesses. In refsrxncs
iArssy - The respective amornfs due. The
snlt rs continued over until this morning
Ia Judge stfsfton's court several casss we're
dispoaed Of b. disUiesal and others continued
ior sanse- The petty ;asy called for VAS in ~
se1danes. bat waz excused until sodav.
In Judge Hume's department. nothing was
aoas Judge Humes VS. present for short
time during the morning. but q he il stu on
the sick List his court was adjourned fof the
day.
wrssoa cos ATTACHMENTS.
In the attachment suss Of Finch. Van ssyck 4
So against Winscr & Co. one of the creditcn
o. the attached dry goods arm, .
hearing wa given last evening By
Judge IehtenbeTg on motion TO Dissolve the
aifacnnent Testimony waa ofefed BY sfidsr
VII relating 70 the iEtens OF the defendant COM
pauy IN securing its stock by . mortgage given
~ favor OF tbe Mesrhanfsf National bank.
fnfouzh Cashier MeFadden. At the conclusion
OF the arguments Judge Liehsenberg refused 70
dissolve TIRE attachment on the grounds that
the mortgage issued on March II was
gwen 10 delay the creditors In
case they pressed their claims. There was .
Question concerning the validity OF the bond
given By the defendant which was reserved for
argument until q later date.
REsTRAISrss oRDER MODIFIED.
In the case Of J. n Flax ef al against Elliott
Bay Bridge and Pile Company, modification
Of the restraining order issued few days stnce
was asked for by the defendants attorney. II
was asked that the court modify the restraining
order previously issued 70 ~ to allow r. Fred
REX, 0ne OF the principal defendanfs. 70 con-
unne building certasn warehouse. the erection
oil which, on lot OF the john Leasy addition,
was stopped BY order OF the cosrk The order
Vas granted. with the stipulation that the ware
house was to be removed at any time upon the
issuance Of m injunction bond for 1900
with ~ $. Bifsencourt and W. II. Mand - surs-
ties. wss nled and approved
SUITS Foa pTyoRcx.
0ecrgfsna welimsn has brought suit against
James weliman for divorce. she alleges that
they were married at Eas, Towas, Mich, in No
vembsF isso She charges her hus and with
habifuai drunkenness. cruelty and failure to
support her. aud asks that when divorce Is
granted her maiden name Be restored to her.
Mary A. Bixby has sued her husband, George
Bixby. for divorce Her complaint states that
they were married 1T Seattle, April. 1857. She
charges him with failing 70 decenfiy support
her. although, she alleges that he IL the owner
OF about $4,000 In real estate.
NEW SUIT FILLED.
An appeal suit was fled from Justice G. n.
Rivers court, on default Of j. NJ Blanchard for
SIS and costs in IN action brought by Koenigs-
berger, Falk a Myer.