The Iola register. [volume] (Iola, Allen County, Kansas) 1875-1902, 1890-03-14

The state::of Kansas vs Henry Blum.
The State Of Kansas vs. Mrs. Henry Blum.
The State OF Kansas vs Charles Patton
The State OF Kansas W. Charles GrOth.
The State of Kansas vs. william Lassman.
The state Of Kansas vs. Alfred Tillery ct al.
The State Of Kansas vs. Alfred Tillery ct al.
II A. Ewing confession VS. G. Benton con-
Eli Almack vs. the Kansas City Psc. RI.
Beck & Almack VS. the Kansas City 4 Psc.
Rv. Co.
C. =. BeadIe vs. the Southern Kansas Ry. Co
W. Moody vs L. G. Bramley.
VIM. Mckie vs L Robbins ct al.
Western Farm Mortgage Co. vs Jane Rut-
Ursula Sleeper vs. Mary Sleeper and Lyman
Mary e. Hottenstein vs. the Southern Kan.
The Phoenix Mutual Life Ins. Co " VIM. A.
West ct al.
Walter Bronson W L. A. Gillenwater,
L. w. Keplinger vs. acob BROOKS ct I'll.
James Brady Samuel j. Stewart.
John A. Christy vs. W. A. Cowan.
Knight & Foust vs. H Barnum and John Bar.
mum.
P.s. Hoffman ct al. VS. p. C. jacobson ct al.
City OF lola vs. n. r. Acres.
MARCH Is.
L. L. Northrup vs. J. A Sampsel.
NJ. A. Delsp ys the southern Kansas Ry. Co.
DIV BOstwick W VIM. b Geishennen.
Geo. W. Bowlus W John r KIngsley ct al.
Smith & Cole vs. Jarvis Conkiin Mortgage
": G; Jones vs. D D. Britton sheriff and l..
Samuel ) Stewart. guardian ETC.. vs. Ellie:
Eiiz. T. KIser vs. Geo. W. Kiser.
Phelps 4 Bigiow Windmill Co. W Z. Stro-
snider ct al
tors estate Of B. H Dayton deceased.
L. NJ. Boake W Stoyer and Pratt administra.
tor estate b. II Dayton.
Slower and Pratt sdmrs. estate OFF. n. Day
". B. Rand vs. Alez. R. Barley.
e III. Mcclure vs. II. Sproul.
Nettle l.. Young vs.. John B Young.
A. G. g. shockey vsJ. n Hanson ct al.
T.. Culbertsou vs. C Kelsey. chairman
of the board OF county commissioners ct 81.
Slower 4 Pratt admlnistrstors estate Of b. Il.
Paul Fisher W 8 A. Woodari ct al.
j. z. Malsberry vs D. e. krnest and Mary E.
Reed.
L. A. Thrasher vs j W, Mcclure ct al.
Peter RumbIsd vs. T. F. Strickland, const. ct
A, y. Nysrrum and sesis Lamblin " Ed
The 1: ssaddard Grocery Company. . eOrpo-
Appeal from the final report Of J II. Hacket
Tsnssr Of hs firm s q Co.
w. K. Land and Isaac Garlic 80 ThOmas Las.
ter and Thee Maxim.
William Mcconnell vs. william Davis.
l.; D. Romberger vs. B. +. Kirby and.hrs.
Arthur O'Leary NJ. d VI. Arthur O'Lesry
The Phoeni. Mutual Life Insurance Company
c. II. Pratt vs. J. e. Ard
John Dodds vs. Moore & f3urtis
James Hart vs. Olive Myers.
q a n n
Farmington SAvinSs Bank vs. Mrs. j. q. Ad.
ANS and Geo. II johnson.
Matthew White W the Mo. Pac. Ry. Co.
Phoebe Kinsman vs. Ionic Kinsmsn ct al.
Edinburg Lombard Investment Company
limited. corporation vs. Lyman Martin ct al.
doing business under the arm name and style
Fryer, his wife.
Emma Ran VI John Raj
Charlss A. Twist vs Josie Twist.
Esia Stephenson vs. W ID. Matthews
Charles Smith vs. Young & Hoffman aud
Moss.
Joseph Parkinson W Joseph Pike ct 81.
". d Matthews and Martha Mathews. his
vile ys Dsla Stevenson ct al.
W II. Mcclure a.siyne OF the assigned sstatr.
OF L. H. Gorrel & Co. W Henry Waters.
MARCH 20.
w. G. Matthews VS. W ID. Matthews.
NJ. w. Turner vs. John Locke and VIM. A
Burkett
Hooker SHAPED and Robert SHAPED 70 Allen
Br yant.
Julia A. B whitney W John Klddo ct al.
Esla Stephenson ct 81 vs w. ID: Mstthews.
Hiram d. Upton V William valentlne OF al.
Il q. Clark vs L Lindsay ct sl.
Edward Austin and Charles b. Tindsl W
ct al
.Chas. +. Aerriman us the City Of lola.
w. H Moore W Bridget Moran et al.
The lola Building & Loan Bss0ciatiOn 70 w.
l.. feighbour admir- ct at.
The New England Loan and Trust Co. 70 A.
'rr,l T.. Norman 1T al.
%. Arnett 70 n. X. Arnett.
Nelson Burnham W John Norris q sI.
In the matter OF the change OF name Of Win.
am II. Stigenwalt u WIN. II. Root.
Esla Stephenson vs W. e. Cohen snd ". d.
Matthew'S.
The simple application Of SwAYNs's
without any internal med
Icine will cure any case Of letter, Salt