Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1890-01-30

hliss "hiSh - @btaCucu " tic ilcu
list, is added:
CERTIFIcArK.-I hereby certify tina,
the foregoing is iull, true and correct
copy Of the list Of registered voters in
Second Precinct, Salt Lake City, Salt
Lake County, Utah, to the 18th day OF
January, 1890. E. r. CLUTR,
Deputy registration officer.
Third-TheZTi6agle shouts-"Where
is z. F. Warmers OATH"
Rcpg-Ask Col. Page, the city
registrar. The oaths of all persons
whose names are on the register are
filed with him.
AHsicer-He hasn't got 1t.
RepIy-Then you are no better Of.
the inference being one OF two
That the covering up process in
wolves collision or that L. r. Clute
placed the name on the list without
complying with the law in relation
to the prerequisite of taking the
oath.
Foirth.-The ''Liberal'' white
washers say the name of Z. +. War
ner is not on the original list.
Ans'rer-Then who took 1t off?
The proof is beyond question that
1t was copied by Z. r. Clute from
that list to the one filed with the
Recorder. 1t would be a very bad
thing for the "Liberal'' dodgers to
insist that he certified officially to n
lie. Ii might lead voters to believe
that if he has no official integrity as 4
a registrar, he would have none as 1
an assessor and collector.
A1lother.-It has been put ont by |
the "Liberal" gilders that the name /
might have been copied from loose
slip and not from the original list.
AHSUeT-E. r. Clute certifies that
he copied it from the original list.
AdUsce-The "Liberar' tricksters
who are trying to cover up this bust
ness had better acknowledge the
corn" The facts stick out too
prominently to be covered up.
LATER on THE SANE SUBJECT
The Tribune continues to boil over
regariing the foregoing ezposi, and
this mornings issue has this regard.
ing the NEWS:
"But it, like the hyena, oonceals IN.
fact that it was after 10 pm. when the
list was finished. and that Col. Pare
informed Mr.. Wells that the list was
rushed through, had not been verified.
and that there were liza bic 10 be errors
50 common are clerical errors in such
documents that the usual certificate
includes the words 'errors and omis-
sions excepted" and no one ever con-
iiders G certificate Of that kind as a ,
'erfeet guarantee against clerical or.
ors."
AnsOer-phis clerical error sub- I
eriuge is too gauzy. The placing q
I mans name upon the list who
not a qualified voter Is not an r
rror Of the clerical kind-tbu. a
Ernest F. Warner, 65I, S. West d
-emple Street." not being a legal !,
otter, his name had no business :
here at all. We are not nearly so d
ke hyena as the Tribune blum. D
ering apologist is like an ass, as
lown below: (.
quite cedr-This from the same r;
rtiele as the last foregoing: $;
How the mistake wa, made ;s ~
ade perfectly clear. Mr.. Clute had .,
en- rushed to death for several DAYS q
1.-THE day the list had 70 be sent up pi
copied 200 names. Under the dis SD
'line Of the campaign, there w.rs til
berals appointed in every preciuc, W. W
see thatall names Of possible voters T.
lould be got before the registrars an
IN handed in these names. and tho or
lies Of the registrars were covered hi
b them"
fcJOinder-Yes yes; We under IN,
nd all about the Liberal" disci- Nj
he and the liberals" appointed bis
over the tables Ofthe registrars S Se
n loose slips with the names of the
sons written thereon who had no are
BIT to vote, that they might be did
eed on the registration lists. ira:
ase give some. more asinine ex- the
nations that make the matter nov
Sc and worse. "a one
AF fesa