The Stark County Democrat. [volume] (Canton, Ohio) 1833-1912, 1890-11-27

There are others who think the young
man Is not guilty and charge lhe Aul WIN
beina Intimate with several other meh'
la fact this charge 10 made by tue yenhB
man, aud his father anl mother lhls
only tends 10 Increase The feeling, hnl
makes the fight against Rev. Mlshler mo
more bitter
the FATHER pF THE GiRL TALKS
Mn. Abe Bnwers, the father OF The gllli
was seen by the reporter last night lle
appeared "a he rather quiet sort OF q
man. and takes things very easy lie
said be was snrry lley, Mlshler had been
eTcommunieated, as he liked 20 hear hlnl
preach, Ito has no hard feelings against
him 0n account Of ITO son, hlil llhlihes
tha stories circulated against hls lauHl,'
ier, lle knew very u lle about llle chnI9h
light aud appeared 70 care leHh', lie
inlked at some length hut gave very little
information ia regard 70 Tie questions at
issue, -, -...
then seen, but nothing new eoull 10 on
laned from them, They would lo, very
little talking ana claimed not W hhpw
much about tic case, except thhl " hWfltu
over testimony given by Rev Mlhlller ~
court, an were anxious 70 have ne mat
ter settled, and u was plain 70 SOC " was
the subject uppernoHl ~ the minus 'l H'l'
THE MINISTER INTERVIEWED
Rev, Mishler was seen At bis pleasant
home, ne asked tn be excused
from an interview until ihe hlhnh'
lnq committee had given a adeelhlon, Wlieh
he said be- would willingly prepare ahlhle'
ment Tor the NEWsptMocbAf, Aller some
talking he went into the details uI lhe
cafe, telling Of the trouble, ana 'he hifeh'
OF his son, whom he still
HFLEyfs 10 nE INNOCENT,
lle of course thought he should not he
punished Tor Tie iehtlmbny given, 40 "
was aB he reo0lcoled the matter, ana he
had no Intention of telling q fnlaehepl,
and did not do ho on any material pnlnI
lle 10 anxious for the matter 10 DO Hellltu
and
WILL AmnE m THE DECISION
of the standing cummlltee. lilo would
have the privilege ui carrying y up 70 lhe
annual conference, hut y II 70 ueelueu
against him by tic committee, no VIII ho'
The reporter learned that II the other
aide lost, it was their Intention 70 take u
into conference, II seems that al'er lhe
trial la court, Rev Mahler was
ASKED 10 PUBLISH GARD
~ one nl lhr county PAPNlNi NHN'Hh 49,
hia own signature that he was wrong ln
the testlmony given 40 there was q prayer
meeting on the night la question, Ihia
| he declined 10 do, aa Ia his opinion no
meeting was held that night, He was will
lingto
ADMIT IE WAS wRoNu,
an 20 no meetings being held on Saturday
night hut thought he was right aa TO 'he
| partlaular uIUlt
The outcome Of the case and the deeis'
| lon OF the standing committee, VIII DO
awaited with much Interest, ana no mat
ter which way II N given, there VIII DO
many people dissatisfied
The trouble In the Dunkard church In
settled ~ iaf AZ the standing committee
| Ii concerned, and Il caunot be called
| Victory for either side, Rev. Jacob u,
| Mlahler makes "a public acknowledgements
which II ID thought Will bridge over all pI
Tho exclusive article In Thursday
| ulpht'a NgWa.DEMoCRAr caused u great
deal NJ talk. Tho ataudiug committee
made report last night aud adjourned,
| A puhllc meeting will bo held and both
| sides are expected 10 take back hll OF lhe
harsh things said, and peace and harmony
| will again prevail -,
AZ preaent Rev. Mlshcr IL "ailonocd,n
| but after tlme he will again resume
preaching, aud cKpound the doctrines OF
! ihe church TO the faithful ones,
Tho present trouble ia IN the kivor
! Brother church, which 10 separate from
the regular DunkArda, They follow some
of the Dunkard doctrines but the two
churches are distinct
The following card was ordered pub
! liahcd In one of the county papers ana 10
| given 10 the NEWs'pEMuCUAr'
We do hereby say that wo were wrong
In our statements on tho witncaa stand
relative 10 the Saturday cyonng prayer
meetings at Valley Chapel church, while
there was no prayer meeting on the oyen'
inc OF tho 20th OF September, 1883, there
were prayer meetings on alternate Sntur.
| day evenings since tic winter OF 1887 ana
! 1885. When W. nude the statement we
thought We were right, hut siuco learned
that we were mistaken, and hereby re-
| tract our statements relative 70 the above
JACun n, MisnLER
NANuY A, MisnLER,