Evening journal., 1890-12-01

Parnull now enabled the archbishop TO
speak more plainly and he declared that
unless Mr.. Parnell clears himself of the
crime OF adultery, any party taking or re-
tanning him as "A leader will not find the
support, cooperation or confidence OF the
irish bishops. Mr.. parnell's breach of
the confidence reposed iR him by Mr..
Gladstone is blamable act. The arch
bishop said he spoke only OF the moral
aspect OF the case, and left the political
bearings of the manifesto TO the Irish
members.
Mrs. o'shea's Whereabouts.
Mrs. O'Shea is stopping at Brighton with
her four daughters. Mr.. Parnell was with
her there during the recess. He also re-
turned there after the trial
The People Of Cork Disappointed.
Mr. Parnell was expected to arrive at
Cork at 2 O'Clock Sunday morning. The
mayor and league committee waited at
the depot with an address OF welcome and
confidence There was crowd numbering
fully 1000 people, with torches and several
bands. There was great disappointment
when 1t was learned that Mr., parnell was
not on the train. The crowd dispersed
after cheering for Parnell.
Bfr. Davitt's Opinion.
Mr. Davitt says: II never doubted that
Messrs. Dillon and O'Brien would decide
as they have done when the facts III the
case were fully before them. It must have
cost them much pain 20 arrive at such a
decision and its weight with the Irish peo-
pie win be immense The party has come
through the ordeal with the greatest honor
believe il will remain united and indie
pendent IL Mr.. parnell remains in par
Lament hostile to the Irish party he will
be an intolerable menace TO their eff
cheney and unity. Ireland to man will
repndiate him, and Cork will do its duty
Home rule must not be further endangered
by misplaced generosity"
Archbishop oroke's Telegram.
Archbishop Croke's telegram TO Justin
Mccarthy is as follows: I'VE are all sorry
for Mr.. Parnell, but still, in Gods name,
LET him retire quietly and with good grace
from the leadership II be does 80, the
party will remain united In honorable al
lance with the Gladstonians, success at
the general elections is assured, and home
rule is certain. II he does not the alli-
ance will be dissolved, the elections lost,
home rule indefinitely postponed coercion
perpetuated, and the tenants hopelessly
crushed
MIR. GIadatone's Reply.
In his reply to Mr. parnell,s manifesto
Mr. Gladstone denies in toto the state
ments made by the Irish leader in regard
to the retention OF Irish members in the
imperial parliament, the settlement OF the
land or aprarian difficulty in Ireland, the
control of the Irish constabulary, and the
appointment Of the judiciary in Ireland.
Mr.. Gladstone says he will not apply a
single epithet TO Mr.. parnell, not being
his judge lie believes, however, that he
showed by his course In the matter OF the
special commission appointed to investl-
gate the charges made against Mr.. Par
nell growing out Of the Pigott letters that
he had no indisposition TO do Mr.. Parneil
| justice. The conversation between them
was strictly confidential TO publish even
a true account is 20 break the seal OF con.
/ fidence which alone renders political co.
operation possible Every suggestion
made TO Mr.. Parnell was from written
memoranda TO which Mr. Gladstone can
refer
Mr.. Gladstone says he has always held
that the National party OF Ireland ought
10 remain entirely independent OF the
Liberal party OF Great Britain.
Il is their duty and his duty, conform
ably with the spirit OF GrattAn and O'Con-
nell, to study all the adjustments in the
great matter OF home ruie which may tend
to draw TO their side moderate and equita-
BILE men. But for him TO propose any
measure except such as Ireland could ap-
prove on lines already laid down would be
fatuity as regards himself and treachery
to the Irish nation, in which, even by the
side Of Parnell, he can claim 20 take an
interest.
Il is reported that unless Mr.. Gladstone
withdraws the denials contained in his
letter, Mr. Parnell will produce the proofs
upon which he relies TO establish the ac-
curacy Of the statements made in his
manifesto.
John sroriey's Reply.
Mr.. John Morley's reply to Mr. Parnell
is as follows;
The manifesto published by Mr. Parnell con.
tains two or three statements which affect me
which desire without loss Of time 20 correct
First made no sort Of attempt 20 fetter Mr.
Parnels action with reference 10 the land bill.
He agreed with me In all our conversations that
the bill ought 70 be opposed as omitting the
principle Of local control and for other rea.
sons specified 10 his speech Of April 81 The
only question was as 20 the form OF motion for
the rejection OF the bill ] pointed out To him
CApril q that, as many Liberals objected 20 the
whole principle OF the bill, an amendment stat
ing their reasons would be less suitable than a
motion FOR is rejection simplicita, and Mr.. Par
nell assented.
PnrneIl's Alternative Plan.
Two days later he explained 70 me his alterna-
tive plan for fiuing down rents, and this, at his
request, was Immediately communicated to Mr..
Gladstone The same evening ! wrote TO Mr..
Parnel that Mr.. Gladstone felt we could have
nothing TO say about his plan one way or an.
other, but that, OF course, he was perfectly free
~ PROFOUND IL on his own responsibility. so com.
pletely did we recognize that our relations with
the Irish party were an alliance and not fusion,
He Made No Proposal.
Second-Mr Parnen imputes 70 me in our con.
yersation Of Nov. 10 Give days before the pro
ceedings ia court we're begun that made a re-
markabe proposal with the object OF absorbing
the Irish party into English politics by means OF
Office made no proposal Il was natural that
in free, confidential discussion Of the possible
future | should wish 70 make sure for Mr.. Glad
stones Information that Mr. Paimell still held to
his self denying declaration Of 1880. His answer
TO my inquiry was what fully anticipated
The "Plan Of Campaign" Estates.
Third Mr.. Parners account OF what passed on
the subject Of eyicted tenants on the "plan Of
campaign" estates is wholly incorrect. observed
that some direct action might become necessary
though, OF course l forrsaw difficulties n the
way OF legislation. never said that or any of
my colleagues had formed any conclusions against
legislation, 1 never said nor limited that it would
be impossible for an Irish parliament 10 do any
thing IN the matter. ! did say that, whether by
direct or indirect action, evicted tenants ought
not TO be allowed 10 suffer as 70 Tipperary
there is all the difference between sensible per-
ception OF difficulties and the despair which Mr.
Parnell asGribes TO me.
Parneil Did Not object
Mr. Gladstone is wen able TO deal with his own
uluru Nf haa untfa h.teN 4 ts..4