The enterprise. [volume] (Wellington, Ohio) 188?-1899, 1890-02-12

Wnich led 10 Inc organization OF the State
Bar Association and its auxiliaries in the
several counties, and defined the objects
and aims thereof, which were clearly for
the benefit OF the general public in secur-
Ing the speedy administration of justice.
He gave a list of those who were men,
bers OF the bar in this county when hs
was 0dtniited, nearly all of whom are
either now deceased, retired from prac-
tice, or have removed 10 other fields Of
labor. The list is as follows:
Hon. II D. CLARK,
Hon, Philemon Bliss,
Hon. A. A. Bliss,
Hon. Stevenson Burke,
Hon. j. NJ. Vincent,
Hon. L. A. Sheldon,
Hon. Geo. g. Washburn,
Hon. w. W. Boynton,
Hon. ] II. Dickson,
Hon. L. B. Smith,
J.V. Coon, Esq,
E d. Holbrook, Esq,
Early Poppleton, Esq,
Geo. Olmesiead, Esq.,
Joshua Myers, ESQ.
In aafew fitting words he introduced
Judge Burke,who was warmly welcomed,
and who proceeded to deliver an instruc.
tive and interesting address, in which he
defined the three coordinate branches OF
the government, and especially the or
ganization oil the Supreme Court. He was
frequently mpplauded, and was listened
toiwilh deep interest. As the association
voted to publish the address we will omit
noticing its salient points.
At the close Of the address president
Johnston adjourned the meeting and in.
vited the association and its guests TO
pariake Of banquet al the Deebe House.
After few minutes oi social chat at
the hotel, the guests repaired to the din.
ing-room which was soon nlled with a
jolly crowd OF ladies' and gentlemen, in.
GLIDING, besides the members and their
ladies, Judge Greene, Of The Common
Pleas court, and wife, and judges Baldwin
and Caldwell Of the Circuit court. The
menu was of choice selection, served by
nimble walters, and the banquet, both In
service and substance was all that could
be desired.-RepublIcan.
The following business has been iis-
posed OF by the Common Pleas court,
Judge Lewis presiding.
Lille B Gepford vs. Alvin W Gepiord,
divorce. Divorce granted, and custody
OF child and alimony $500.
Wealthy Bellinger vs. Joseph B Clark
executor, TO contest will Continued.
LBsmith VS. Carl Knispel et al, tore.
closure Of mortgage. Decree see jour-
ual. ~,94l,
Susie Austin VS. W. E. Austin, divorce.
Continued.
JC Mclaughlin VS. Stephen Kellogg,
continued.
M W Phelps VS. Sheldon Slreetor ct al,
money only. Continued.
Nelson Wheeler vs. jackson Wheeler.
injunction and relief. Continued.
CIV Wadsworth vs. II W Wadsworth
ct al. partition. Continued.
Lottie Gregory VS. William Edgerton,
money only. Verdict for plaintiff
s216.42.
Patrick Congdon vs. Michael DALEY,
to recover possession Of real estate. Con.
iinued.
John Eigner VS. John Garrett ct al,
money, foreclosure and relief Dismiss
ed at PLAINTIFF cost,
Joel V Sampsell vs Simon s Thorman
ct al, money only. Continued. a
L Nef vs. Franklin Neff, alimony,
injunction and relief. Dismissed at de-.
fendAnt's cost.
Catherine Moringer vs. Peter Mcringer,
divorce. Dismissed at defendants cost.
Leland J Harris VS. Angeline Harris,
TO set aside will. Settled and costs
paid.
Ohio ex rel Catherine Moringer VS.
Peter Moringer. Dismissed.
David Reeves VS. Jepnie Reeves, d.
vorce, Granted.