The Hawaiian gazette. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1865-1918, 1890-12-30
COURT CALENDAR.

".
kCreighton, Deputy Attorney-General.
Court viii open at 10 a. NJ. for prelim-
mary business. Hawaiian jurors attend
At P. NJ, and foreign jurors when mott
led.
HAWAIIAN JURY.
The King vs.. John Kamakaia and Ke-
.iihookano; murder. Davidson-Kaulu-
zou for Ksmakaia; Rosa for Keliihoo-
sano.
The King vs.. George Woolsey; assault
4 and battery. Appeal from Police Court
II Honolulu. kaulukou for defendant.
The King vs.. lapeka; house-breaking.
The King vs.. ID. Iosua; liquor selling
thout license. Appeal from Police
hrt Of Honolulu. Kaulukou for de-
.sndant.
The King vs.. James Shaw; assault
nd battery. Appeal from Police Court
9i Honolulu. KauluRou for defendant
The King VS.. Wm. Joe ct al vagrancy.
appeal from Police Court OF Honolulu
The King Us. AIaikai; larceny.
kanwe K vs.. Noa Kailianu; eject
nent. Smith for plaintiff
k2heana X VS.. Nalimu Wv j. eject
nenL Achi for plaintiff; Rosa for de-
isndant.
MIXED JURY.
$. a Macy ct al VS.. W. r. Castle;
case. Neumann-Peterson for plaintiffs;
Hatch for defendant
Kaniku VS.. j. NJ Monsarrat; eject
ment. Achi-Johnson for plaintiff; de-
endant in person.
Robert Pahau ct al. VS.. Ipuhao ct al;
eiectment. Smith for plaintiffs; Thurs
,0n-Kane for defendants.
Pnkg VS.. Eliza Meek eft al; ejectment.
Kane for plaintiff; Rosa for defendants.
Eiiz. Harvey ct al. vs.. Fanny G.
Iraham; ejectment. Kaneakua-J Ohm
son for plaintiff; Brown for defendant.
Hawaiian Hotel Stables VS. Eliz. X.
Cummius; trespass. Carter for plain
IF; Brown Tor defendant.
hanakaohua w. VS.. Thow Chow,
4ssignee in bankruptcy; replevin. Dav-
ilson for plaintiff; Ashford for defen-
dant.
Wilder x Co. VS.. John Richardson;
assumpsit. Ashford for plaintiff.
Wilder K Co. VS.. Hawaiian Fruit and
Iaro Co.; assumpsit. Ashford fer plain
-is
Emma u. Nakuina ct al. VS.. a. J.
L0pes ct al; ejeetment. Magoon Tor
u.aintiff; Rosa for defendant.
FOREIGN JURY.
The King vs.. Chong Hip Hing and
four others; violating Sec. 3, Chap. II,
Avs 1856, as 10 gaming. Appeal from
Police Court OF Honolulu. Ashford for
ieiendants.
The King VS.. Chong Hin; unlawful
qlssession OF opium. Appeal from Po-
Ice Court Of Honolulu. Magoon for de-
.sndant.
The King vs.. Fook Chong; unlawful
p9ssession OF opium. appeal from Po-
Ice Court OF Honolulu. Ashford for de-
iendant
The King vs.. w. O'Halloran; assault
and battery. Appeal from Police Court
Of Honolulu. Davidson for defendant.
The King VS.. j. Lyons; selling foreign
goods without license. Appeal from
Police Court of Honolulu
The King VS.. All Sung alias Sam Hoy:
burglary. Ashford for defendant.
The King VS.. Angee; perjury first de-
gree. Ashford for defendant.
The King VS. All Hung; perjury first
legree Ashford for defendant.
4 The King VS.. All Fook; perjury first
.ree. Ashford for defendant.
The King VS.. All Hung alias Chock
cen larceny fourth degree appeal
ON Police Court OF Honolulu. David
on for defendant.
The King vs.. r Gerke; assault and
artery appeal from Police Court of
honolulu. Whiting for defendant.
The King VS.. Akana unlawful pos
'ession of opium; appeal from Police
curt Of Honolulu. Neumann for de-
enIant.
The King VS.. Young John Wing; as
ggt and battery; appeal from Police
curt OF Honolulu.
J. Z. Brown vs. F. j. Hill ct al. as
lmpsit Neumann for plaintiff; Brown
OF defendants.
81 Wal vs.. J. II. Soper damages;
.rpeal from decision of McCully, j.. at
-lambers. Castle-Hatch for plaintiff,
.p1allant; Creighton for defendant.
"a 81. Crowley vs.. Hawaiian Gazette
Co.. trespass on the case. Davidson
ilr 1laintiff; Hatch for defendant.
J A. Magoon. administrator, vs.. S.
Ahuii; assumpsit. Whiting for plaintiff;
Ashiord-Hatch for defendant.
Nm. Wallace VS.. Z. Hutchinson ct al.
ease Neumann for plaintiff; Whiting
for defendant.
LGu Hee Fan VS. Lau Shou; treSpasS
on The case. Neumann for plaintiff;
Davidson for defendant.
Leu Saa VS.. Lau Shou; trespass on
1he case. Neumann for plaintiff; Da-
sidson for defendant
II. Ludlof VS. p. Neber and 7. H.
Iruschler; trespass on the case. Neu-
mann for plaintiff; Ashford for defend
ants
Joe 6. Barros VS.. Antoine Borba as
sumpsit Ashford for plaintiff; Davidson
Tor defendant.
E De Herblay VS.. s. Norris; assump-
SIT. Neumann for plaintiff.
a J, Campbell VS.. 2. q. Camarinos;
. covenant Hatch for plaintiff; Neu-
mann for defendant.
Tong On Jan & Co. VS.. B. F. Diling- |
ham; assumpsit. Neumann for plain |
tifs.
Z. Oliver vs.. Hawaiian Gazettee Co..
tort Whiting-Neumann for plaintiff; |
Hatch for defendant.
L. Ahio vs.. Aka: assnmpsit. Castle |
q.