The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1890-03-26
APRIL TERM


The April term OF the Su. rene Court
,pens Monday, April 9TH The first fifty
:ases on the calendar are those Ter con-
'piracy and riot arising out o, the last
and which were continued
from last term. The other cases on the |
are as follows:
HAWAIIAN JURY.
The King VS.. Palu (k). Murder. A
Rosa for defendant.
The King VS.. Kahaku Tx. Larceny.
The King vs.. Holi tk). Embezzle-
ment.
The King VS.. J. n. Paikuli. Violating
election law. Two charges.
The King VS.. A. Davis. Rape.
The King VS.. Ane Hilo (w). Assault
with deadly weapon.
The King VS.. Poai (k). Larceny.
The King VS.. Manuel Silva. Selling
liquor without license.
The King vs.. kahalepauole ct al.
Violating fishing laws. Appeal from Dis
trict Court, Waialua.
Naval ct AL vs.. Athena. Ejectment.
A Rosa Tor plaintiffs, S. K. Kane for de-
PENDANT.
G. K. Keomaka VS.. III. B. Lohelani ct
al Ejectment. Achi for plaintiff, Kane
for defendants. :.
Kaeiale VS. Lula. Replevin. Appeal
from Police Court, Honolulu. H. n.
Castle for plaintiff, Rosa for defendant,
appellant.
j. Pelekane VS.. David Ohule. Trover.
Defendants appeal from District Court,
Waialua.
]. Mana VS.. ]. C. and S. M. Kaaukai,
Damage. Appeal from Police Court,
Honolulu. Hatch for plaintiff, Achi for
defendants, appellants.
MIXED JURY.
Kaahanui vs.. C. w. Kingsley. Tres
pass. Appeal from Police Court, Homo
lulu. J. L. Kaulukou for plaintiff, ap.
pellant, A. P. Peterson for defendant.
Eliza Meek, by her guardian, VS.. AS
| wan, Assumpsit. Appeal from Police
| Court, Honolulu A Rosa for plaintiff,
appellant, Kane and Creighton for defen-
/ dant.
S. A. Macy ct al. vs.. w. r. Castle
Case. Neumann and Peterson for plain
tiffs, Hartwell for defendant.
Mama ct al. vs.. Antoine Richard
ejectment Achi for plaintiffs, Brown fol-
defendants.
A. L. Keohokalole vs.. Apahu. Eject
ment. Rosa for plaintiff, Kaneakua fol
defendant.
Aiana VS.. James r. Holt, Jr. As
sumpsit. Achi for plaintiff, Rosa for de
| PENDANT.
Kaniku vs. j. NJ. Monsarrat. Eject
ment. Achi for plaintiff, defendant in
| person.
S. K. Mahu ct al. VS.. David Dayton
administrator. Magoon for plaintiffs.
/ Apiopio ct al. vs. Wong Leong. Eject
ment. Rosa for plaintiffs.
| FOREIGN JURY-CRrlINAL CASES.
The King vs.. Richard Clayton. AS
sault and battery.
The King VS.. M. j. Freitas. Libel.
The King vs. Alb Hung. Larceny.
The King VS.. Manuel Figueira. Oh
structing and perverting justice.
The King vs.. Sin Pat. Cruelty t.
animals.
CIVIL CASES.
Skinner & Co. versus Hawaiian Gov
eminent; assumpsit. Neumann TO
plaintiff ;Attorney-Ge General for defendant
r. Oliver versus Hawaiian Govern
ment assumpsit. Neumann for plain
tiff; General for defendant.
FL. Hills versus j. E. Brown; as
| sunpsit. Brown for plaintiff; Neumanl
and Carter for defendant.
w. f. Foster, assignee, versus w. ii
Page; trover. Whiting for plaintiff
Brown for defendant.
T. r. Luziwieko versus Hawaiian Gov
eminent; ejectment. Whiting for plain
tiff; Acknowledgement for defendant.
J. E. Brown versus F. j. Hills ct al
assumpsit. Neumann and Carter TO
plaintiff.
The Waianae Company versus Antoni,
J. Lopes; eiectment. Rosa for plaintiff
Brown for defendant.
Edward M Brewer ct al versus w
n. Page; assumpsit. Carter for plain
tiff; Hatch for defendant.
Hawaiian Government versus w. S
Luce ct al; debt. Attorney General TO
plaintiff; Whiting and Hatch for defen
dants.
4 Hilo Sugar Company versus iona
Tucker, deputy collector of taxes; az
sumpsit. Hatch for plaintiff.
See Wal versus ]. H. Soper; trespass
w. r. Castle for plaintiff; V. V. Ash
ford for defendant, appellant.
G.. E. Williams versus D. II. Davis G
al; trespass on the case. Peterson fo
plaintiff; Hatch for defendants.
M. A. Gonsalves versus G. L. Brito e
al; case. Kinney for plaintiff.
ID. NJ. Crowley versus The Hawaiia
Gazette Company; trespass on the case
Davidson for plaintiff. -
L. Ahlo versus Aiau; ejectment. W
r. Castle for plaintiff.
Chong Fook versus j. ii. Soper; tres
pass. Davidson for plaintiff.
The Metropolitan Meat Compan
versus John Ross; assumpsit. Hate
: for plaintiffs.
CAUSES FROM OTHER CIRCUITS.
Kalauola versus Kekukahiko; ejec
!, ment. Kane for plaintiff; Kauluko
: and Rosa for defendant.
Emma Nj. Nakuina versus S. X. X,
, pihea; trover. Smith for plaintiff; Ros
for defendant.
. TX. Kaunamano versus w. A. XIII
: ct al; ejectment. Holokahiki and Kan
for plaintiff; Magoon for defendants.
VIM. Henry ct al versus r. Maikai
, al. appeal from Commissioner of Pri
l ate Ways for KoolaupokO, Oahu. kar
for defendants, appellants.
G. w. G.. Jones VS.. Samuel Norris; a
sumpsit; exceptions from decision
Judd, G. J. Smith for plaintiff; Hate
for defendant, appellant.
Valdemar Knudsen versus Louis
e Stolz, Deputy Collector of Taxes; a