The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1890-10-03
II. C. THACKERAY, Solicitor.
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.
In the Circuit Court
for Hartford County.
In Equity.

Robert y. dOpRl0B,
Executor of
William b. Rowland,
VS..
Helen Rowland, Robert In the Circuit Court
C. Hopkins and Mary K. for Hartford County.
Hopkins his wife, In Equity.
Hugh Rowland Isabel
Rowland, Ernes tine
Rowland and William
S. Rowland.
THE OBJECT OF this suit is to procure de-
i cree for the sale of certain real estate ia
Hartford County, State of Maryland, of which
William B. Rowland, late of Cecil county, Mary
land, died seized. - n,
land was seized and possessed of a tract of land
situate near the city of Havre de Grace, In
Hartford county aforesaid, containing four num-
bred acres, more or less and known as the Old 10
Bay Farm" and which was conveyed TO him by
two several deeds the one from Henry W. d. Ar
February Sd, 1874, and recorded in Liber A. l.. j.:
No. 80 folio 30, one of the Land Record Books OF
said Hartford county, and the other from otno
Scott trustee, dated March 18th, 1855. and re-
corded in Lber A. L. j., No. o. folio 3D. announcer
of said Record Books; that being so seized and
possessed, the said William b. Rowland depart
ed this life on or about the 10th day of Septem-
Der, 1885, having first made his last VIII and Tes
lament dated August oath, 1885, duly executed
SO as to pass real estate, and recorded IN Lloer
G., Vol. IA, page ia, one OF the viii Record
Books of Cecil County, aforesaid that said VIII
has been admitted to probate by the Orphans
Court of said Cecil county; that the plalnuH
was appointed one of the Executors of said w i'll
| and has duly qualified as such Executor tnat Dy
said Will the said testator devised said 'Old Bay
Farm" and gave directions concerning 1t. as roi-
| lows: Three-sevenths of it to the said Mary r.
| Hopkins: three seventies of it to the four chill
| dren, viz: Hugh, Isabel, Ernestine and william,
of a deceased son, William. of said testator, and
| one-seventh of it to a son, Samuel Rowland, and
| a daughter, Helen Rowland, of said testator
| that the said Robert z. Hopkins should manage
the farm and pay annually % HnnEi1 U
three-sevenths of the net income TO tne SAID TOUR
| children, and one-seventh of the net income TO
| the said Samuel aud Helen Rowland that II; at
the end of five years, it should become desirable
| to sell said farm, the said testator desired the
| said Robert c. Hopkins to sell it and divide pro-
| eeeds es follows: Three-sevenths to the said
| Mary k. Hopkins, three-sevenths for the sup
port of the said four children, and one-seyenth
| 10 be divided between the said Samuel and
| Helen Rowland that the said Samuel Rowland
died on or about February 9th. 1888, interstate
and unmarried and leaving surviving him the
| following sisters and nephews and nieces. child
| rem of a deceased brother, to whom. as his only
Rowland in The said "Old Bay Farm" has de-
scended, namely, the said Mary X. Hopkins,
sister. who intermarried with the said ROBERT Y.
Hopkins is of full age and resides with her hus-
band in said Cecil county, the said Helen Row
land a sister. who is of full age, unmarried apd
resides in said Cecil county, and the said Hugh,
Isabel Ernestine and William S. Rowland, chill
dren of deceased brother of said Samuel Row.
land all of whom are under twenty-oue years OF
where beyond the jurisdiction or tnls court tnal
the time fixed by said Will for the sale OF said
I farm has arrived that sale thereof is desirable
| and that il would be to the advantage of all the
parties interested TO have such sale made and
the proceeds distributed in accordance with saio
Will.
The bill prays that decree may be passed fol
the sale of said farm and that the proceeds may
| be distributed among the parties interested &C
cording to their respective rights.
1t is, thereupon, this nth day of September
1890 ordered by the Circuit Court for Hartford
county, in equity, that the plaintiff by causing
COPY of this order to be inserted in some news
| paper published in SAID Hartford county, once il
each of four successive weeks, fifteen days be
fore the Sd day of November, 1890, give notice Il
r the said absent defendants of the object AM
this Court in person or by solicitor, on or befor
| the said Sd day of November next, to show cause
if any they have. why decree ought not TO b
passed as prayed.
= True copy, test,
19Sep3t a. IL. JARRETT, ClerK-