The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1890-10-26

plaintiff to file statement on motion for
new trial; defendant excerpts.
d. Hamer vs. G. E. Brainard ct al mo-
ton for new trial argued, submitted and
taken under advisement.
G.. w. Carr ct al. VS.. Ralph Ingham; mo-
ton for new trial taken under advisement
by the court.
David Kay VS.. V. H. Harding ct al; mo-
ton to tax costs argued and taken under
advisement
c. Spect ct al vs. V. H Harding ct al.
motion to tax costs argued and taken under
advisement.
First National Bank of Cheyenne VS.. the
Ogden City Railway company; demurrer
to complaint and motion to separate the
two causes of action joined in the com
plant; argued, submitted and taken under
adviSement.
California National Bank vs. w. R.
Swan ct al. motion to separate the causes
of action in the complaint overruled by
by consent of defendant as of date nunc pro
tune, and order made staying sale on exc
cution for thirty days.
First National Bank of Bloomington. L
linois, VS.. A. II. Swan ct al. judgment
taken for plaintiff by consent of defend
ants attorneys.
John H. Taylor VS.. M. B. Buford; mo-
ton to retaX costs argued and taken under
advisement.
A. w. Wertz VS.. Western Union Tele-
graph company; ten days additional in
which tip file statement for new trial.
Willard City VS., Thomas Woodland; mo-
ton to set aside verdict in this case argued,
submitted with proofs and taken under ad-
visement.
D. Zilla Ashby vs. P. c.. Funge ct all;
demurrer to complaint and motion submit
ted without argument and taken under adj
visement. r1
Peter Wilson VS.. the Ogden Power COM
pany; judgment entered in accordance with
prayer of complaint by consent of the de-
fendant's attorneys for the sum of so, 900
David Reese VS.. e. r. Hadley; motion to
set aside the Judgment in this case argued,
submitted and taken under advisement.
Sophia Arnston VS.. Peter Arnston; order
granted to require defendant to show cause
why an attachment should not be issued
against him for failing to pay alimony and
attorneys fees as heretofore ordered by the
court.
Humphreys & Co. VS.. j. u ]. A. Culloch
Judgment entered in accordance with find
ings of law and fact by Referee A. r. Hey
wood, and ten days. stay of execution
granted.
In re-application of Minnie r. Barbour
| for writ of mandate; motion of her attor-
ney to quash alternate writ.
| Anderson VS.. Anderson; II. H. RolapI
| entered his appearance by consent OF de
| PENDANT.
John A. Taylor ct al VS.. M. B. Buford ct
al thirty days stay of execution in which
defendant shall file and serve statement on
motion for new trial.
| First National Bank VS.. Daniel Hamer
motion for judgment on admission of the
answer taken under advisement.
N. W. Silsby vs. Jennie Silsby; motion
for plaintiff to show cause why he should
not pay alimony and counsel fees pendent,
| lite, argued and taken under advisement. c
| j. G.. Landrick VS.. P. j. Rodford; de
murrer to complaint, argued and taker
under advisement.
A. G. Fisk VS.. A. B. Patton; motion tt
show Commercial National bank why i
should not make a complete statement of
moneys belonging TO Interstate Land and
Town company.
A. c. Fisk VS.. B. B. Patton; Friday, 10
o'clock, October 81, set for hearing q
motion to require A. B. Patton to file 6
more full and accurate report in the cas-,
and a motion in behalf of Patton to have
his report allowed and approved.
c.. G.. Fisk VS.. A. B. Patton; order ap.
pointing L. j. Hudson as referee, witt
authority to have evidence and pass upol
all claims against the said Land and LOAF
Town company.
George S. Milliken VS.. M Ann Milliken
motion for decree Of divorce, decre'
Granted