The daily critic., 1890-10-06
DUDLEY AND HUSTON DENY
AND LIE.


Caucht in lha act of coloniziog The
doubtful Northern States with negroes.
even nuDtEY winCes. and enters p la
rtal oftte Worlds sensational exposure.
but his denial IS Of that peculiar kind
common TO men taken by surprise 10 O
mearnos they expected would never be
exposed
He was approached by LINDSEY, who
rrofesscd 20 be a philanihropist inter
tsted tn the welfare of the negro.
LINDSEY wished 90 find homes for a
number If "dovnroddsu men Of
color and DUDIEy, being also a
plilarthropist was anxious 10 help In
TIE laudable effort That was ALL lie
never thought Of politics 10 connection
with LINDSEY 8 colonization scheme.
Heaven forbid lie Is not that kind
of a man. There can be no reason for
surprise, therefore, when II Is an
nCuuCcd that DUDLEY Is shocked at the
utter vickedness Of the World and de.
ClsrCs the colonization story silly
fake H." he says, the World can
stand The ridicule Of the newspaper
reading Americans, the object Of It's at
tacks ought 10 be able 10 stand &C.
But there are the letters Of LINDSEY
aud Of QUAY and DUDLEY admits that
he received an order from QUAY to pay
LINDSEY 81 600 out Of The treasury Of the
National Republican Committee, and
le doos not deny that If $1,000 had
been given by the committee It would
have been expended In furtherauce Of
LlNnsEY's scheme. II will be seen that
puniEY's denial and the facts do not
consist"
But what are we TO think Of HusToN2
lie has been regarded as pretty good
tdrt Of q fellow, and the world has per.
sisted On believing him % De reasonably
l,uo,t IN spite of the fact that he Is a
ur8EIrg RopJblisan politician ot the
iloaua school lie also denies the po-
W.,al purpose Of LISDsEYs scheme
i'c ai.0 regarded q as a phihnthr5pie
movement lie dll not suspect that
there was any political purpose ia
tlsu,H desire 10 send 10000 North
Carolina negroes 20 Indiana II
IIsu-Eg hal proposed a political
scheme OF the kind set forth IN the
World, says HUsroS, "it would have
been promptly and emphatically sat
down upon.
But, Mr. HUsroS you wrote let.
Ger 20 LISpsEY, and this letter was pub
llshed IN the W0r'ig"
well, maybe did fcan't remen.
Der About that time my correspond
ouce was very large. and / dictated
many letters that have forgotten all
about"
Yes, OF course. We understand
that. Mr. IIUsroN; but, look here; IN
the letter 10 LINDSEY you say I myself
am heartily in favor Of Il THE oolonizl-
tion schemel. and at the first oppor
iunily will speak to the President about
n, or will, II opportunity would offer,
talk 20 Mr MILLER, though / DO not
believe be could be induced 10 feel the
same Interest In Il that / do. He has
never taken much interest In practical
politics, Now, NT. HUSTON, If Mr..
LrNpsEYs scheme was purely philan,
thropic Why ala you say MIhLER would
not BE- interested 10 il because he was
Hot a practical politician"
OF course, Mr HUsToS has nothing
20 say.
"And. Mr HUsros. why did you
propose 20 talk 10 the President abouI
the sChtme
well. now, really dId not mean
the PTssideRl o. the United States. Ny
TefeTeucs % the President was intended
ss a reference 20 the President Of a 10,
cal club IN Indiana Of which | am a
member
'Toa man wh0 Nlll make such an as
i,Iliau as lhis-tell a flsehood So pal
Iallt-lheTe q 10 use 10 Talk he Is as
lsda man as either QUAY 81 DUDLEY
tsl Ls has uU the tongue holding
afI.HY Df ihe former nor the genius Of q
TalHciI dlp.1mat-lhe gift OF ski.
iu 8iu-- Possessed hy the latter III.
isa usHsnareut hunbug
LOTTERY NATTER RULES
pre---..t-r f.arar.I pVtst.r.rrp bat