The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1890-01-03
a ASST Hartwell for plaintiff; Attor-

assumpsit. Hartwell for plaintiff; Attor
! ney-Uenerai for defendant.
}. Z. Bowler ". Hawaiian Government
assunpslt Hartwell for plaintiff; Attor
/ ney-General for defendant
/ \. Crawford W.. X. Briggs et al assump
~. Magoon for plaintiff: Smith for de
\ PENDANT.
X. oliver vs.. Hawaiian Government
assumpsit. Neumaun for plaintiff. Attor
! ney-General for defendant
! B. j. Hills ". =. T.. Brown; assumpsit
! Brown for plaintiff; Neumann and Cartel
| for defendant.
r. harrison vs.. Peter High; case. Hatch
| for plaintiff.
W. +. Foster. assignee, vs. W II. Page
trover. Whiting Tor plaintiff; Brown iol
defendant.
W. {. Parke, assignee, vs.. w c. Pea
cock; troyer. Brown for plaintiff; Whit
ing for defendant.
W. c. Parke. assignee. vs.. S. J. Levey
replevin. Creighton for plaintiff.
r. K. Luziwieko vs.: hawaiian Govern
ment; eiectment. Whiting for plaintiff
Attorney General for defendant
J. +. Brown VS.. +. J. Hills ct al as
sumpsit. Neumann and Carter Tor plain
tiff.
The Waianae Company VS.. Antonio J.
Lopes: ejectment, Rosa for plaintiff;
Brown for defendant
LII tue iuatGST Ol whitening street IN
Honolulu appeal of s. c. Allen, appeal
of Trustees estate of B. P. Bishop, appeal
of Mrs. E. c. Snow.
In the matter of widening Fort and King
streets in Honolulu; appeal of Trustees
estate of B. z. Bishop, appeal of J. w.
Austin and c. r. Bishop, appeal of J. w.
Austin. appeal of James Campbell.
In the matter of widening Merchant
street in Honolulu; appeal of J. w. Austin
Austin.
Edward NJ. Brewer ct al. VS.. w. H. Page;
assumpsit. Carter for plaintiffs; Hatch
for defendant.
Ahina alias Yong In VS.. Wohung;
ejectment. Achi for plaintiff.
u. w. e. Jones VS.. Samuel Norris; as
sumpsit. Smith for plaintiff.
l.. c. Ables VS.. John G. Kitton ct al as
sumpsit. Hatch for plaintiff.
Y. knudsen VS.. l.. IL. Stoz, deputy tax
collector; assumpsit. Hartwell and Hatch
for plaintiff; Peterson for defendant.
CAUSES FROM OTHER CIRCUITS.
Kalauola VS.. Kekukahiko; ejectment.
Kane for plaintiff; Kaulukou and Rosa
for defendant.
J. X. kaunamano VS.. w. A, Kiha et al
ejectment. Holokahiki and Kane for
plaintiff; Magoon for defendants.
Emma NJ. Nakuina vs.. S. X. Kupihea;
trover. Smith for plaintiff; Rosa for de-
PENDANT.
Kuheana VS.. Pahulima; ejectment.
Kinney for plaintiff; Ashford & Ashford
for defendant.
NJ. de Gouveia VS. H. n. Greenwell ct
ais; ejectment. Kinney for plaintiff;
Hatch for defendants.
John Robinson VS.. Mrs. L. NJ. Nakuina
ct a.; ejectment; Kaulukou and Poepoe
for plaintiff; Kinney for defendants.
BANCo.
Kahula (k.) VS.. H. u. Austin tort;
exceptions from Second Judicial Circuit
Peterson for plaintiff; " V. Ashford for
defendant.
MahOe eft al VS.. A. Kauhi ct al; equity
appeal Kinney for plaintiffs; Achi for
defendants, appellants.
DIVORCES,
Miriam Keau VS.. James Kea,l Achi for
plaintiff.
Louis Rodrigo VS. Ellen NJ. Rodrigo
Neumann for plaintiff; Brown for de-
Nj. K. Kou VS.. Koleka (w). Brown for
plaintiff.
H. II. Smyth VS. Lulua Maemae (w).
KaulukOu for plaintiff.
Aloiau (ch.) VS.. Emma Aloau. Kau-
lukOu for plaintiff.
A. Gramberg VS.. Hosepa Gramberg (w).
Smith for plaintiff.
Eliza WOolsey VS.. Geo. w. Woolsey
Whiting for plaintiff.
Joaquin NJ. Sozo VS.. Beke NJ. Makalena
Mary H: McKeague VS.. John McKeague.
Rosa for plaintiff.
Puuku Kaleleku vs.. Rebecca z. Puuku.
Poepoe for plaintiff.
P. CA. de La Nux vs. Rebecca de La
Nux. V. V. Ashford for plaintiff.