New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1890-09-18
TIE LANGSTUN- vENAELE ELECTION CASE.

WASHINGTON Sept. lin the House Mr. liaigcn
called up the Lang,tonvenabe election case against
which Mr.. OFerrin raised the question "f considers"
tiou During the rvlcal nearly all the Democratic
members deserted the chamber. leaving bare dozen
preseut 10 look out for their Interests Before tv an
pouncement Of the vote Mr. OFcrisl rose and said
that he had carefully kept tally VI the No'c. lie
noticed that mpon the recapuation "a" nam" OF VIZ.
MoIpv Of ohio. noted a voting III inc aihrmat'"'
lie wa, sure that Mr. Moiey had not bocn present when
hi, name Wa called but that lie lad given in his name
at the clerks desk. He inquired VI the e'h'ie'S"
from Ohio whether that wa not true
Mr.. Morey said that he was not answeraIc 10 mo
gentleman from Virginia. lie remembered WIEN III INC
XLNIIIih Congress the gentleman hid 'o'n oa' amer
DAY calnOrug for the right to bc head III 'ces'u ~
his title 10 seat In this house. to which he i M''e,
believed that the gentleman had not been elected Yet
the gentleman to-day was obstrnciing legislation W
order TO keep duly elected member nom Ia, seat
Mr. O'rerrall said that there was no Necessity for
auy excitement over the matter TIE gentleman c.
element had effect upon MN Ni Ic'T""'
than tho wills peiing OF the ~ind. lie oe'hanuc" 10
know whether the gentleman had been present "heh
Ills name was called. and he tcIed the gentleman 10
say that he was Would the speaker decline t" iHr''i
cat. IN. question \, 10 whether Mr.. M"rtv had been
present.
The speaker said that the lIOn~e had ug I" hi"w
whe her the gentleman from OHIO was recorded Al me
proper tine The gent-nsn'> nam" would b' p"' ""
The Iist of those present aud not Young.
The result Of the vote va, then sniouI" ed l""''
13S: NAYS. 1.-THE clerk noting quorum Nj liaise'
Immediately demanded the prcviou, qie'iion "i Tie
elr.,o, .s,c and the direction All 80 ont was HNe'
by the inocrstit managers. Ent WAS h"' ne ~
.ry IL DID: this direction into force for. after All EN-
uac protest By Mr. Chrxdle. VI Indiana. against VIC
Sitting of debate, Mr.. liaugcn withdrew his demand
/ and proce.ded with argument OF the "a"c
/ Mr. Cheadlc. o: Indiana. opposed the najoiN re-"
,oI and declared that the Republicans o! the House
could not AFFORD 10 vote Venabc ont and LaiV''"h II"
The IVth District OF Virginia was reliably Rrp"bii'"n
md H. had been carried by the Democrats because :"
| Republcsu division. II was Il perfectly p'ai anu
natural statement Of fact that the Republican parry
in that district had ben beaten solely by reason o
irreconcilablc difference, III the Republican party u
had been a race division. with oil that such dVI>oi
could imply In the south lie was coEhd'h' that 'hc''
never could be a strong and enectHe R"pi''"h parry
in the .ont, until there enough White men ~ j
TO make II strong and effective. Ignorance r"id III"
dominate and override intelligence. I'll" R"WibiIra'
par,v In the sout, could not be built upon negro VOTE
alone lie hoped for the good name OF the ii"h>e a'
Tor the good name Of the great party to when he ID"
lonacd that there would be enough Rrpnblrah' Vo'h
with him TO retain vcnsble In III, seat ..,
When Mr.. Cheadle CONCLUDED lie was eirc'"" WIZ
applause by the Democrats. The case tien w"ht ov
nnfii Tomorrow Mr. Haugcn stating that he w"hW 'a'
The previous question at O'Clock - moriow'