The Hawaiian gazette., 1890-01-07

contract. Ashford Magoon for plaintiff;
Neumann for defendant,
skinner & Co. vs.. Hawaiian Govern
ment; aSsumpSit. Neumann Tor plaintiffs;
| Acknowledgement for defendant.
Yong Now vs.. J, II. Soper; replevin.
| Appeal from decision Of Judd, Z, J., at
| Chambers. Ashford for plaintiff appel
| liant; Castle for defendant.
/ j. +. Bowler vs.. Hawaiian Governments
aSS1mpSit. Hartweil for plaintiff; Attor-
ney-6sneral for defendant.
]. T. Bowler vs., Hawaiian Governments
assumpSit Hartwell for plaintiff; Attor-
ney-6eneral for defendant.
A. Crawford vs.. L. Briggs ct al sSsump-
sit. Nagoon for plaintiff; Smith for de-
. PENDANT.
K. Oliver vs.. Hawaiian Government;
aSSumpSit. Neumann for plaintiff; Atsor-
ney-General for defendant,
/ F. ]. Hills vs.. ]. E. Brown; aSSumpSlt.
Brown for plaintiff; Neumann and Carter
! for defendant,
f. Harrison vs.. Peter High; case. Hatch
for plaintiff.
| ". +. Foster. assignee, vs.. W. H. Page;
trover. Whiting for plaintiff; Brown Tor
defendant
W. Parke, assignee, vs.. W. c. Pea
cock; troyer. Brown for plaintiff; Whit
ing for defendant,
/ ". {. Parke. assignee. vs.. s. J. Levey;
rsplevin. Creighton for plaintiff.
F. K Lusiwieko vs.. Hawaiian Govern
| msnt: ejsctment> Whiting for piSintln;
Acknowledgement for defendant.
| J. E Brown vs.. +. J. Hills et al; as
sumpSit. Neumann and Carter for plain
tiff
The wsianae Company vs.. Antonio J.
LopeS: siscument, Rosa for plaintiff;
Brown for defendant
In the matter Oi widening street IN
] ,1r,fr. s,sS 4
Of Trustees estate Of r. P. Bishop, appeal
Of Ms. E. c. Snow
In ths matter Of widening Fort and King
| streets in Honolulu; appeal Of Trustees
estate Of 3. 7. Bishop. appeal Of }. W.
Austin and {. r Bishop, appeal Of J. w.
Austin. Sppe2l OF James Campbell.
| In she matter of widening Merchant
street in Honolulu: appeal OF ]. W. Austin
and Mrs. YoumSnS, appeal of }. W.
I Austin.
Edward n. Brewer CT al. vs.. W. H. Page;
sSSumpsit- Carter for plaintiffs; Hatch
Tor defendant.
AhinS &liSS Yong In V. Wohung
eiectmsnt- Aohi for plaintiff;
/ G. W. {. Jones vs. Samuel Norris; a>-
/ SumpSis Smith for plaintiff
l. {. Ab,sS vs. John c. hil.On ct 81; as
>ump>ir. Hatch for plaintiff.
V. hnu1Ssa vs. L H. StolI, deputy ISN
collector: sSSCmp>iI. HSrtwel and Hatch
for plaintiff; Peterson for defendant
CAUSES FEoN orHEE CIECCITS.
KAlSuola vs.. kskukahiko; ejectmens.
h2De for plaintiff; hzulukou ami Ross
for defendant
TX. haunzmzno " W A. Hihs e. 81
sjectment. Hol0kShIki Snd Kane tOI
plaintiff: Mzsoon for defendants.
EmmS n. N&kUinS v. :. X kupiheA
trOyer. Smith for plaintiff; Ross for de
! tSnlaur
: Kuhsznz vs.. Pahuiliuz; ejectment
Kinney for plaintiff; Ashford & Ashford
for defendant
N. de Gouyeis -. H. \. Greenweu e
sis; siec.msnt- Kinney for plaintiff;
Hatch iOr defendants.
: John Robinson V. Ms. I. ". Nakuinz
(. 81; sjectmsnts HSulukOu 2nd Poep0S
for plaintiff: Kinney fo- defendants.
sANco.
Kahuls Fk.l vs.. II. z. Austin: tort
= exceptions from SecOni JUdicISl Circuit
Peterson for plaintiff, '. V Ashford fol
defendant
Mzhos e 81 vs.. 4. Kzuhi e 81; equity
&ppszl- Kinney for plSinrl1>; Achi fol
defendants, appellants
: D-V0ECE.
Miri4n. He2u " James ksau- Aehi fol
plaintiff
Louis Rodrigo Is. Ellen N. Rodrigo
NeGm2nR for plaintiff; Brown for &c
PENDANT
NIX Koa Is Kolsk2 w. Brown To-
: p,zintiff.
L. H Snlyth v Lulus MAsmss W.
hz1lDkO1 for plaintiff
AloszD (ch-l - E.nm2 AIoisu. Kau
lukOu for plaintiff
A G-sn6srE - HO>spG Grzubs-g tSl
Smith for Vl2tnsIE
: EEz Woolsey =. Geo ". woolssy
: Whiting for Vl4Iu-I1-
joaquin n SCG3 - Bezs u. N4kzlens
: Ross for pIzintif.
: Nzry 4 NeNsasus ~ John McHesgCe
Ross Tor glzll5lE-
P1uku N2LslekC " Rsosccz P PUuku
: POspoS for plziatiE-
p c 4 1S Ia NIX - RshsccS de l.,
NIX V Y Ashford Tor plaintiff