Frostburg mining journal. [volume] (Frostburg, Md.) 1871-1913, 1890-09-06

HoIS ana pI"I''t'A, ",''' mus '''' d pa
OF the public. 'Sc'"'1 TO promote III
duStry and trade ana business by CIV
my employment To many citlZens,
and thus ald another part OF I'm" pub
he. And thru, ana last, ana te"@, to
enable men or capltaI 10 comolne
their wealth effectively ana lucratlVeiy
IN accomplishing the two former OBJ
JectS. 70 effect all those ends and not
one alone, this creature Is invested
with high powers, all emanatlng from
the State alone. 1t can own property,
condemn land, use steam ana danger
Gus machinery, &c.' ana, on me other
hand, Is held to high responsibilities.
1t not only may, but ""@ work must
carry height and passengers and to
90 that. II W"St employ men ana TO
the best men; the most experienced
men safe men SOBER men, 1t must
also discharge lEtemperate men, IN,
competent men. All tins 1t IS bound
to do, not by the law OF TOD, Tor GOD
never dld ana never VIII create cor
poratlon, but by 'he law OF men.
Such then beng the state OF the case,
when the company discharges It's OLD;
tried, sale. experienced employees, ana
undertakes the CARRYING OF persons
and property with other employees
now can you or any ofher man pre-
tchd TO say that the people, the pupllc,
the STATE the creator mas no f'ght 10
call upon ITS creature TOR It's reasons
for ITS discharge OF the experienced
employee is me pu0lic pouhd 10
take the wofd OF MIR. "epo .hat ne
dismissed good men Tor drunkenness
rather than Tor being hn'Shts OF La
Dor Inc WORD or no man or SET OF
men stands mat hlgh IN TINS country:
Inc Sultan OF turkey or the CZar OF
Russia may speak mus uhquesilohea
IN their domains. out no one III Amer
lca can 90 II as YET;
Mr.. rowderly,' them as one OF the
puDllc mao 'e9" as wei us moral
right to question the grounds OF tne
olsrharge OF experienced men, "h ia 1t
Is the height OF impotence, as well as
error Tor ME-. Wepo 10 REFER 'ne p'pllc
TO ms sole Woro us Settllfg this matter
OF Iact. Inc reason Tor lhe oischarge
OF me men Is olspulea' 1T Is ii alSpu'e
III when the puoilc Is Legally ana
necessarily lniereS'eu. mere ",S'
men some'hI4S u" arolti ate' ana 'h H
H'ate Oh ne" ork mas feGoghlzeo All
ms ny proVldlnS ooard OF afoitra'
ti9m iof Just Sncn a case.
Ihls Whole docfrlheot "epo that the
pupilc mas 10 ri2hG 10 inquire ll'" tne
mattef peyond MS pare Word, Is so 40
s,iru' ihohStro'S ahu opposed 10 'he
pIalhest principles OF JuStice ana Ia"
lhat am not surprised TO ma tha'
the oouRNAL Is Tue oniy ieSpectaoie
paper WHICH nus enuorsgu II, dnu ain
,eo 10 suspect INA! 'he 'oohNAh HIT
ters l'sell Wileh IL assumes 10 have
u,ScoVereo 'niS ne" m, reason why MI
"eoo was right me JoOKNA u, as
covered IothihS III may me Weoo
uttered the Wonoerlui tn ne, IS hotlllhg
TO aroltla ale hl.lsell. me 'oukNAh
mas surely ''itue lllG '.''S''he vi 'hGorS-
ny cruei' "n'enaole 9oc'iine' "hien
al o'her papers reJeclGu: ,---,
n % asloe lrolil 'ile plalii leS1 "speti
vi 'ile T"Se' upon what posSlole ~, n'o,"
GROUND can 1t o1' asserted 'hat "ep ~.
was not pound oy any mora! or ~
vine law TO give the re reasons Ior d's'
charging tile men Inc ooc'rlhe IS
SllochihS 10 every moral SENSE ana
l,aS not all men ol sroui'o TO rest on;
suppose al oio la'lhlul' eAperieheed
e1hpioSee Is suoueliy o'scnarg &c,
mas he no moral rlS'', 10 snow 'he
reason r: Is ne 10 DC uiSt ; illeo an ana
u l raee' al'' no t''use i'ss's ieu ine
oa'e s'ale'iien' VI sum oasG - SUI
pie'he "fs :''ilen' 10 otet over tile uoc-
,ia' 1t II no' 81 80. 'c'eu upon III uaiiS
I.it ny anyone Gaining h',hSeil /" 'ii'h.
silence III such " case Is me refuge OF
1oll d ,yr"f'! t.lo d coward; Even 'ie
Ianlleo are informed ny 'he supreme
JuoSe Oh lie REASONS lor 'heir con
"e'l'ila loh' Depar' from me ye
cursed lor l was ; d, 4, hu"Sereo ana We
gave me no meat Nc' u. ~,
nv, N" 'iloi"' Id" human vi DiIih
lhere IS every law lor 1t the law Oh
pam hum"hity Oh lhe SiniP'est Jus,
'lce ol 'he n,Snes' nl"ra1 E1 10 oe 'o'o
why you are u'sn'lsSeu' Inc contrary
Is me law oi Tue 'neaileSt coward Oh
the pe'tlest tyrah' the law OIL 'he
master VINO orlVeS MS servant away
him in the face and tell him WHY.
You say the courts do it. 1t is not
so done, or If they do it they violate
the law or else forget Their duty. BY
the Constitution OF thus State and OF
nearly or quite all of the others. 1t Is
solemnly required OF our highest
Judges to llle their OPINIONS IN tcrttn'g
III every case IN which they give Judg-
ment. Thus even IN the case OF vol
untarV lltlGantS, the losing party must