Iron County register. [volume] (Ironton, Iron County, Mo.) 1867-1965, 1890-08-07
ABOUT ExTRAVAGANCE.
In the Past Money Was Spent More RecIS.
lessly Than at Present.


Pessimism continually charges wo-
full extravaganza upon our age. The
fathers, it says, were compelled to
scrape and to save. mindful of every
dollar, and content if only meager
balance remained to their credit at the
end of the year. We are rapidly drifting
into enervating luxury, it affirms, and
our costly buildings, and paintings.
sculpture, our comfortable modes of
life, and our reckless way of consider
ing public and private expenditures are
indicative of an unhappy mental and
even moral degeneration. There is
much apparently in support of such
statement. We are weary of prosaic
living, in great degree, and long for
release to civilization eminently COM
fortab BILE if not luxurious, and, at least,
Interesting" as Matthew Arnold would
say. Not so far beneath our greed
for monetary prosperity, indeed,
existing as potent motive to accumu-
lation. is the natural desire for a better
social condition. We take half-holiday
now and then TO study great pictures or
statues; we read more than ever good
books and magazines, and we live in
n
proper development, and yet we must
confess certain tendency to extrava-
gance, careless and dangerous. Still,
however reckless we may be, it is per-
haps a consolation to know that we are
less extravagant than the people of GER
tain other times We pay our thou
sands for our houses our pictures and
our sculpture, and yet do not equal the
Greeks and the Romans in expenditure.
Attalus offered Nicias a sum equal to
S75, 900 for a painting. and the artist re-
fused him, preferring to present the
picture to his country as gift. julius
Caesar bought of Timomachus, the Athe-
MAN painter, two figures for eighty tai
ents, or $4,000 and Apelles re-
ceived some SO 900 for a portrait
of Alexander welding a thunder
bolt Indeed, he himsef paid S75,-
900 for the pictures with which
Protogenes had adorned his studio, and
which had proved unstable, and this
chiefly as an encouragement to a strug-
Cling fellow-artist. Some of our public
lecturers command excellent salaries,
assuredly, but none of them would de-
mand any thing like the $l2, 900 which
Athens paid to Herodotus for reading
his history at the Panathenaic festival.
Socrates, it is said, received almost
$4,000 for one grafton, and, probably,
even Dr. Depew could be engaged at a
figure more reasona BILE. We all remem-
Der that Virgil was rewarded most gen
erously for his few lines on the young
Marcellus, and Suetonius says that Asel-
Illus Sa binus received four hundred thou
sand seSterces-some ST, O00-for a dia-
logue between mushroom, a cabbage,
thrush and an oyster. 1t cost the city
of the Averni in Gaul round million
and a half for statue of Mercury, and
this expenditure seems to have been
not especially exorbitant for the age. A
hundred other examples of ancient eX-
travagance might easily be found, but
all would point to the same general
truth, that our recklessness of expendi-
ture has not yet equaled the reckless
ness of the past. But we must remem-
Der that a national lapse into luXurio Gus
idleness is followed always by national
decay, and keep our eyes wide open to
the pleasant but dangerous tendency of
the preSent-ProVidence journal