Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1890-09-08

n Ward was confirmed.
= The valuation Of $500 on tn
!. property Of NJ. II. Kimball in tn
q Seventeenth Ward was confirme
Elias Norris request for a reduc
ton in the valuation on his prop
: erty, $50, was denied.
Mrs. Jonasson, Of the Thirteenth
Ward, wanted the valuation of So.
|, 0)J on her property reduced be
I cause she was a widow. The n
quest was refused.
james Chesney failed 10 get 2 re
duciiOn on the valuation OF SsS1,
= on his property in the Seventt
Ward.
The valuation of $500 on Hyruni
! Wagstsa's property was reduced e
5000 because the railroads cut W
his land.
The valuation Of S., 500 on the
property Of G. NJ. Downey was con.
firmed.
]. 7. Chamberlain was relieved
from paying $50 taxes because he
didn't own any property.
The tax Of John b. Lewis, OF the
Twentieth Ward, amounting 10
SILVIA RENTED because Mr.. Lewis
was ninety-!Our years old.
The board refused 10 reduce the
valuation OF SIC, 900 on oh. Pettit's
property in the Ninth Ward.
| The board thought Clute's valua-
ton Of $4,000 in James loves
property in the Eleventh Ward was
fair, and il will stand.
The hoard remitted $ on the
tax OF Mrs. Chamberlain because
she was a willow.
Five dollars was also Knocked OF
the tax Of Mrs. NJ. l.. Cody, in
the Nineteenth Ward.
4 reduction OF $1,000 was made in
the valuation Of SOS, as in property
represented 10y Spencer ClaWs0n.
the reduction was on the property
OF Mrs. Smell, on First Street.
The valuation OF $500 on the
property OF 5. Staley was reduced
70 $500 and $ OF the tax was re-
mitted. This was on account Of old
age.
Mrs. Winters, Of the Twentieth
Ward, asked for a remittance Of her
tax Of -. Il was not granted.
The tax OF Mrs- H. NJ. Smith, Of
the Nineteenth Ward, amounting
TO S3.6l, was RENTED because she
was a willow.
The valuation OF $500 on Louis
Seckles' property in block 20, plat
. was confirmed. Councilman
STAFFORD admitted that in December
he sold this property to Mr.. Seckles
FOR 5000, which was a good prite.
hut hs voted - confirm tine vaiua-
ton.
The valuation OF sl6, 900 on Nellie
Wells property, N the Fourteenth
Waui, was confirmed, as Was aIso
the tax on $500 cash.
Mrs. Ann Hunter failed 20 get a
reduction on the valuation OF her
property in the Sixteenth Ward,
5000.
The valuation Of +. r. El!erbeck's
lot in the Sixteenth ward, $500. |
WIS confirmed, notwithstanding
Mr. Ellerbeck's statement that he
would take $500 for the property I
and paya commission out q il.
= reduction OF $500 was made on
the valuation OF 81, $50 on Herman /
HIPS property opposite the ~.
James.
Quite n discussion arose over the
valuation Of ST., 800 on Mcmillan 4
HIPS property on West Temple
street, north of the Commission
house. The owners claimed thai
they We're assessed on Is feet which
was used as an alley. The matter
was finally passed.
The valuation OF Mrs. Morris
property in the Seventeenth sWari
was reduced from $500 to $500 bs-
cause she was a widow.
Five dollars was knocked oil
the tax assessed against Mrs. o. r.
Shaw, Of the Seventeenth Wand or
the same ground.
Clute's valuation OF SAB on
the property OF Mrs. +. S. Barney,
in the Seventeenth Ward, was con-
frme5.
Mr.. Clute thought the valuation
Of $500 on the property Of Mrs. &.
Davis, IN the Seventeenth Ward.
was about $1,000 too high, and il was
reduced that amount.
a reduction of s. was MADE In
the tax Of sl7 assessed against Mrs.
Of the Eleventh Ward.
A similar reduction was made on
the tax 81 Mrs. futile Of the Nine
tenth Ward.
The board declined TO reduce the
tax Of Catherine FOrsythe, a widow,
10 Sl4 80, and Mrs. James
FairclOugh's request for 2 remit
lance Of her tax OF Sl0.S0, on the
same ground, met the same fate.
The valuation Of g, 100 on the
Of Caroline Sedden was
confirmed.
Mrs. 5. NJ. Whites tax Of $3.50
was reduced - because she was
widow. Mrs. O. J. Petty was re-
lieved from paying 3 on her tax Of
$3.50 for the same reason.
Mns. Susan EdwarGs got a reduc-
ton Of $ in her tax on the ground
Of widOwhOOd.
The valuation of 81, 500 on the
property Of AIrs. Emily Wood
was confirmed, because
Clute said her claim OF excessive
was absurd and not 10 be
for moment. He gave
as another reason why the vaiua- ,
lion should lie confirmed, that the
lady speculated in real estate.
The taxes OF Mrs. Rose Pringle.
lf the Twenty-finst ward, $685., and ,
Mrs. w. II. George Of the Eleventh ,
ward, $3.50, were RENTED because
they were widows.
The valuation OF $1,000 on the !
Of l.. N. Rose, in the I
Twelfth ward, Was confirmed.
A reduction OF Sl.l50 was made
IN the valuation Of Mrs. X. Brinker-
lOf's lot in Nineteenth ward.
Clute's valuation Of IS, 500 on the
property Of John Eckerman was
X G. Newson was taxed on half
A rod more Than he owned aud the
error was corrected. The valuation
Of $, 200 on his property was reduced
10 $, 500.
The valuation of so, 200 on the
property Of John BlakemOre was
confirmed. CIute admitted that his
valuation was about double v hat It
should he.
The valuation Of Ss5. 800 on the
Burr Frost property in the Eighth
wand, was confirmed.
The tax of $50 ASA SEED against
J. l.. Robinson was RENTED because
be was an invalid.
The request Of Martha 8. Adams
Tor remittance Of her tax Of $500,
on The ground Of widowhoOd, was
denied.
Ms. j. Parker failed TO get n re-
unction on her tax Of S22.l0.
Inc valuation Of $500 on the