New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1890-03-20
THE RrrlRrMENr or PENCE BISMARCK.
from Tic staai. zcltuns.

From the staas zcitung.
The Imperial Chancellor as We have begn aeon, Gems
toned t. can Prince Bismarck fos t"' dee Nc com
pared himself al one 81 hi, l'pnl.s 'fri'"- .'
Ing: some tmr ago "'." "''.'t ',,,.,,,i f.,ii
scotland. Twelve time, "hs Liu'r Pt''Ii"N l,''
gaining the royal 'rD"n - bloody ia'N' ~,
couraecd. Zee w.tadrc" q" a igA," '', ir t.,l. r.
pcatcd attempt, t. splu web upon N"'h :, .','..'
10 climb wall. The lic tlraH e'oh' lN'-'' III ,t
Iq,c had already exclaimed tlat the spider hah lH'n
Ike himself. when IL, iitecAil attempt VA 'ioN,,'
with success. Not Wishing To- BE- beaten ly a -p'l,l;
the King took courage To- try thirteenth time ana
gained hi, object Iils anc'dot". according 10 l.l,-
march'> own admi..'n. w,qc s',t I,.'t
bruce and hi, spider and resumed hi, cnd"Npi
That. however wa, year 40, t2dh} tA' -'p''"
ecnarian viii aeknowlciec himself defeated.
some years ago, in ~, when the samc Imperial
Chancellor. then an Old and broArn down '1.n,
ton 10 the aged Emperor. 10 va, returned WIN ihc
single word never written on the margin Ih,t
-Four year, before hs resignation ~ the lIr.li'h'}
# the Pfus,ian Ministry had been accepted ~ th'
montana courtlcrs Won Then an cphcmci1i vi'i"rN.
Iiut in lc-, than year the Chancellor va, again III
ng his end. became Emperor after the death ~
William ]. Bismarck resigned . Second time a, Chan
pcror refused Bismarck, request. Bat wc do know
that the whole world would not have been surprised
had ds missed the Chancellor But another rcpcti-
tion OF the rcquc-t necessary TO remove bismarck
~ vet the cause, which led to The resignation Il
bismarck ard is acceptance by the Emperor are not
breach between the youthfnl Emperor and hi, chief
counsellor, who could look baea upon forty eight
years Of public service. must have come sooner or
later. But do not believe that the breach
unavoidable. II H. true that mischief makers
NAV have caused difference, between the two men hN
telling the young Emperor thnt hi, authority va,
shaken by suggesting 10 "a" aged Chancellor That
he WAS Inundated by dependence upon the VIII OF
one 80 much Younger than himself Iut the 'ltn-
ccllor had earned the rleht 10 be- treated WIN Ill,
tingulshcd consideration hy the Emperor. Ihc breach
was therefore not unavoidable, ana there 10
no doubt that the real blame ics with the younger
We consider II premature 10 discuss according 10
their merits the varied and version, Of tho
causes which led 10 the catastrophe The real nature
Of bismarck are named ana their policy announced.
We do not consider II probable We should also con
slider II "A great mistake that one man VIII again J."
entrusted with the ChanccOr- mp. the Presidency Of
the rnssian Ministry and the control Of foreign la,
INT whoever nay De- named ms successors. the
resignation Of the Iron Chancellor VIII c cause ~
exultatlDn. not only among his cnemlc,, but
also among the enemies - Germany In all parts ~
thc world The Clcricnls and the Social Democrats
Will share the merit Of having brought about III" iall
Of the Bismarck dynasty and they VIII hl.' at hr-t
claim - the fruits ~ thrir success. ihc French ana
Russians Will break ont in hymns 81 rejoicing over tho
f,ll Of the they feared. and viii rc" I'm hs IAN
proludc 70 the fall ~ Germany. li the best friends
Of Germany VIII be ill'd with sorrow, ana the members
~ thc rrplc Alliance viii need more Than the usual
assurance II they not 10 believe that. with tis
Chancellor his create work. the Triple Alliance" VIII
also ic relocated 10 the past. We heartily hpI thil
Tho pee-im4ts are wrong. But We DARE not forget
that great efforts and great successes on thc part "i
Inc new men Germany arc necessary iciorr ihcN
can 1--WE tho German Empire that prestige which IL
viii lose NV the resignation - smnrck May william
II never find causc to regret the day on Wh'h u" be-
lcved himself able 10 do without the iron Chancellor