The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1890-02-14

2 George A. Gilbert, 5 VIM. Norris,
8 Robt. G. Richardson, Is Frank j. Boyd,
Samuel ]. Kirk,
Judge Waters, in his address to the Grand Jury,
reminded them that it was not their duty to try
cases, but to hear evidence and if the State pre-
sented prima facie case which would secure con-
yiction to present the party or parties to the
court. He asked the jury to shorten their session
as much as possible and not to send for witnesses
without good reasons for doing so.
The entries, on the call of the docket. were as
follows:
Judgments by default.-John w. Littig vs.. Samuel
S. James, ct al. W. H, Dawson, 7. E. Tome and
F. r. Williams for plaintiff, Septimus Davis for
defendants.
Elizabeth Gantz VS.. George NJ. Wiley. s. A. VIII
d. D. Hess s. Sons vs.. Jas T. Knight. S. A.
Williams for plaintiffs.
Susquehanna Fertilizer Co. VS.. Jacob F. Gerwig.
S. A. Williams for plaintiff.
Smith & Allen vs. II. P. and E. G. Hopkins. 5.
A. Williams for plaintiffs; Hopkins for defendants.
Stetted.-Albert G. Griffith VS.. John T. Evans
Archer YanBibber and Stump for plaintiff, VIM.
Young and Cooley for defendant.
same %o VS. sam Marine fG Tor plaintiff 6 STUMP
State of Maryland. use of VIM. Young, vs.. VIM.
B. Michael. VIM. Young for plaintiff, Gilbert for
State of Maryland, use of VIM. Young VS.. John
W. Everist VIM. Young for plaintiffs, Gilbert for
Henry l.. Taylor vs. Orrin Alderman ct al.
vanBibber for plaintiff; VIM Young and Cooley
for defendants.
JOIN. John P: Sheppard VS.. C. c. Herring s Son.
Reuter- s. Mallory VS.. Richard G. Houston. garni-
shee of John Ma1on., VIM; Young for plaintiffs,
Archer & VanBiDber for defendant.
John Sappington VS.. David H. Stokes. j. NJ
McNabb for plaintiff
A. NJ Hancock & Co. vs. Albert Lofn Hancock
for plaintiffs A. ?. Gilbert for defendant.
laae Bro sGSw snG M II Carr gaVnsheet
plaintiff, Archer 4 VanBibber for defendant.
A. Nj, Hancock, agent, Albert IOfiin. j y.
Young and Stump for plaintiff, Gilbert for defend
Henry steffens VS.. James L. Burke. Gilbert for
plaintiff, Lee for defendant.
Chenworth Crew, administrators Of James S.
Chenworth, VS.. ThOs. j. McCausland, garnishee.
>. A. Williams for plaintiffs, VIM. Young for de-
Chenworth and Crew, administrators vs.. John C.
McCausland. S. A. Williams for plaintiffs, VIM.
Young for defendant.
Alice A McKendless vs. Jacob P. Walker. VIM.
L. Cooley for plaintiff, VIM Young for defendant.
Dugda1e & Emmart use II. c. W. schwab, VS..
Gustav Schady Harlan & Webster for plaintiffs,
Win. Young for defendant.
Edmiston & Waddell vs. VIM. w. Hughes. Hop
kns and Preston for plaintiffs, VIM. Young for de-
PENDANT.
Archer and W. L. Cooley for plaintiffs, Maynadier
for defendant.
VIM. A. Steever VS.. Frank A. Brown. Robinson
Roland & Co. VS.. Chas. A Rutledge & Bro. W. H.
Dozen, S. Archer and S. w. Bradford for plaintiffs,
2. H. Rutledge for defendants.
II. ID. Sellman vs.. John A. Cunningham & Sons.
Lee for plaintiff, Wm Young and Maynadier for
defendants.
Kent Iron and Hardware Co. of Wilmington. Del.
vs.. Lemuel w. Murphy. Dozen, and Bradford for
plaintiffs, Lee for defendant.
f. b. Mallory s. Co. vs.. Amos w. Washington.
Dozen and Bradford for plaintiffs, VIM. Young for
defendant.
Thompson & Burns VS.. John T. Bartol. War
burton for plaintiffs, ?. l.. Hopper for defendant.
j. M. FreSch & Bro. VS.. Gustav Schady. Dozen
for plaintiffs.
:. A. M. Fulford vs.. j. NJ. Herman. s. A. Will
1infN fNrt al it,tiF SO, IAF,,
Charity Hopkins VS.. VI. T. C. Whitaker, agent
VIM. Young for plaintiff, Robinson for defendant.
Lazarus Ley VS.. Henry L. Taylor, 2 cases. VIM.
Young and Cooley for plaintiff, j. j. Archer for de-
PENDANT.
Sarah A: Butler vs.. Calvin c Prall. VIM. Young
and Hopkins for plaintiff, Robinson for defendant.
Coates & Co. VS.. Harrison Hopper. VanBibber
for plaintiffs, Marine for defendant.
Chas W: Stelif VS.: Bennett Arnold. Dozen and
Bradford for plaintiff H. W. Archer for defendant.
Young for plaintiff, Stump for defendant.
der for plaintiff, VIM. Young and F. h. Williams
for defendant
L. Mary Williams VS.. VIM. Hennessy. VIM.
Gustav Schady VS.. Chas. Blackburn. w. Young
and I; r. Williams for plaintiff, Maynadier for
Lorentz & Ritter VS.. John H. Emmord Stump
for plaintiffs, Bradford and Marine for defendant.
Geo. w Hautmeyer, ct; al vs.. Patrick Donnelly;
VIM. Young for defendant.
James L. Burke VS.. Conrad Krouse. Lee for plant
John A. Wakeand VS.. Elizabeth Knellinger. w.
Young for plaintiff, Maynadier and Stifier for de-
PENDANT.
Harrison Hopper, administrator, vs. P. L. Hop
per. Marine for plaintiff, VIM. Young and s. A.
Williams for defendant.
Z. NJ Allen, trustee, vs.. Horace Stokes s. A.
Williams and VIM. Young for plaintiff, Maynadier
and nd, Hopkins for defendant. I,
VIM. w: Healey VS.. VIM. S. Horn. VanBibber
VIM. H. Harlan VS.. John D. Thompson. Harlan
q Webster for plaintiff.
Agreed.-Winfeld Peters vs.. c. A McGaw's
garnshee. VIM. Young for plaintiff, Harlan &.
Webster for defendant.
Referred. John S. Richardson VS.. Geo. NJ.
yewett VIM Young for plaintiff, VanBibber for
Charles H. B. Massey VS. Bernard j. Irwin
Harlan 4 Webster for plaintiff.
Of.-Mary G. Vanhorn VS.. Geo. w. Davis. ex'r.
Williams for defendant.
Young and Stump for plaintiff, VanBibber for de-
P; H. Rntledge, trustee, vs. John and Morris
Corkran. Rutledge for plaintiff.
John Leight VS.. b. and o. r. r.. Co. VIM. Young
and Dozen for plaintiff. VanBbber for defendant.
Frederick Gunther VS.. Jos. H. Holmes. Gorrell
T. R. Hubbard Sonvs j. Crawford Thompson
Vim. Williams vs.. Thos L. Bull. Stfffier for
plaintiff.
Judgment Confessed.-The Springfield Manufac-
turing Co. VS.. c. w. Amos. McNabb for plaintiffs.
James Bradford & Co. VS.. Barnes & Archer. 5.
A. Williams for plaintiffs, VanBibber Ifor defend
ant.
Adam w. Lowth vs. same. Same cOunselS.
Hostetter Bros. vs. Same. Same counsel.
J. Howard Pugh VS.. Same. Same counsel.
H. Merriman q Sons VS.. Same. Same counsel.
Listers Agricultural Chemical Works vs.. Same.
Same counsel.
Geo. Walker VS.. Albert and Ella Lofiin tried
before the COURT judgment for plaintiff for $171.95.
VanBibber for plaintiff, Gilbert for defendants
Moore Bros. VS.. Harlan and Mitchell, trustees,
garnishees judgment for plaintiffs for Ss3.4l. Van
Bibber for plaintiffs, Harlan Il Webster for de-
PENDANTS.
Patrick Moran VS.. VIM. Bellingham, guarnishee,
judgment for plaintiff. VanBibber for plaintiff.
Cecil National Bank VS.. VIM. j. and &Vm. II.
Thompson; judgment for plaintiff. Price for
plaintiffs
PENDANTS.
tries.
Same VS.. Jonas C. Huff. Same entries.