Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1890-10-08
SUPREME COURT CALENDAR.

Following is the Supreme Court calendar
for Sacramento, November term:
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 1890.
Court meets in Bank at 10 O. clock A. NJ.
Motions
Examination of class of applicants for admis-
sion to practice.
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER II, 1890
20,642-People VS.. Howard.
20,6T5-People VS.. Arras.
20,66l-People vs.. Chew Wing Sing.
20.69S-Peope VS.. Powell.
20,740-People VS.. Bing.
20,741-People VS.. All Sing.
20742-People VS.. Lee Quong.
2O,744-People VS.. Bowden.
20,745-People VS.. Flick ct al.
20 749-People VS.. Cessna.
Is 314-Fiske ct al. VS.. Soule.
13,S54-La Brie ct al. VS.. Nary ct al.
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER u, 1890
1S,379-Linn ct al. VS.. Gloss.
13,395-Cosgrave ct al. VS. Southern Pacific Co.
Is, 557-Kneeland VS.. California Iron and Steel
Company.
Is, 799-Chittenden VS.. Pratt
IL, s00-Chittenden VS.. McRae.
13,S17-Threikel, administrator, etc., We. Scott.
Is, S52-People vs. Dunn.
Is, S53-Smith vs. Hill ct al.
14,0S3-Volcano Road Company VS.. Board of
Supervisors.
14,044-Stony Hill Turnpike Road Company
VS.. Board of Supervisors.
14,045-Hermocilla VS.. Hubbell ct al.
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 1890.
19472-Murdock, adm, VS.. Clark ct al.
10 977-Murdock, adm, VS.. Clarke ct al.
Il, Sl9-Lassen County VS.. Shinn ct al.
13,S39-Cole VS.. Segraves.
l3,Sl6-Chester VS.. Field ct al.
14,075-Spect vs. Spect.
l3,7l0-Preble ct al. vs.. Abrams.
13,7G4-Foreman ct al. VS.. Boyle ct al.
13,776-GaTdner VS.. Stroever.
Is, 92l-Logan VS.. McRose ct al.
II, 022-Davis VS.. Baker.
14,032-Tucker ct al. VS.. West at al.
FRIDAY, NOVEMBER IA. 1890.
12,996-Callahan VS.. Warder.
12,2l2-Moulton ct al. VS.. Knapp.
13,465-McLean ct al. VS.. Crow, adm, etc.
13,6S2-Barnhat VS.. Fulkerth ct al.
13,7i7-Carter VS.. Wood ct al.
10 ,9ss-Board of Directors of the Modesto Irri.
cation District VS.. Tregea.
14,059-Crane VS.. Mccormick ct al.
13,79O-Hays VS.. Gloster ct al.
13, S20-Spargur ct ux. VS., Heard ", ct al,
l3,s73-Mott VS.. Ewing ct ux.
13,934-DarriS vs. Sullivan.
13,959-Darris vs. Sullivan.
MONDAY, NOVEMBER II, 1890.
1$,6l0-Langan VS. Langan.
13,770-Remy VS.. 0lds ct al.
l3 S35-Derby g. Co. VS.. Jackman.
13,61l-Ellen (by his guardian) VS.. Lewiston
13,711-Jatum VS.. o. Brien ct al.
Is Sl9-Jatum VS.. Smith ct al.
l3,960-Richards ct al. VS.. Travellers Insurance
Company.
l4074-Donahue VS.. Meister.s
14,O92-Nevsda School District vs. Schoecraft
ct al, etc.
O,1l5-People vs.. Travers.
l4,007-Spear vs.. Lyon.
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER Is, 1890.
13,424-wren VS.. Mangan ct al.
lS,60S-Fulton vs.. Brannan ct al
13,e64-Ross vs. Kennedy ct al.
l3.665-Nu.tall VS.. Logejoy ct a..
13,705-Buchanan VS.. Maggie ct al.
13,72l-Dewar VS.. Ruiz, Dept; Gardner, inter
venor.
Il. 723-Eltroth VS.. Ryan ct al.
l9.7S9-Diss VS.. Hinckley ct al.
J3,752-Belcher VS.. Farreu ct al.
l3753-Harney VS.. Farren ct 81.
l3767-Hyde VS.. Margap.
13,S06-Wright ct al, VS.. Gohn.
wErNEsDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 1890.
Il 725-stevens vs. Lovejoy ct al.
IS s32-McDonald VS.. Taylor ct al.
I3 S65-Hayes ct al. VS. Fine ct al.
l3,S79-Miller ct al. VS.. Byrd.
1904 ESrey vs. Southern Pacific Company
Is e25-Heinlen vs. Phillips.
l3949-McFadden VS.. Tennent.
lS,9i4-MeNee VS.. Lynch.
IS, 9l5- Goldberg vs.. Thompson ct al.
l4O5S-Estate of DanielsOn.
I4O63-Harlan ct al. VS. Stuf1ebeem et al
14,0eS-Cohn et al. VS.. Wright ct al.
14,070-Woody ct al VS.. Bennett ct 81.
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER, 20, $780,
ISL -Dedmon ct al. VS.. Nofiitt ct al.
l379S-OnetO VS.. Resteno.
l3,SG6-Neubs umer, admir-, etc, VS.. Woodman.
l3SS7-Smith ct al VS.. Smith.
1f024-Estate Of MisGmOre.
I4O57-Yore ct al. vs.. Bankers and Merchants
Life Association.
I4O69-Palmer ct al. VS.. Marysyille Demo
crat Publishing Company.
Is6iS-Moore VS.. Moody.
~ -Rurke admr, VS. BOurs ct al.
13gl6-Sutro ct al. VS.. Rhodes.
1851 Chadbourne ct al. VS.. stockton S. & l.
Society.
1s,9S5-Bryan VS.. Swain
FRIDAY, NOVEMBER q, 1890.
70 at9-Frankel VS.. Deidesheimer.
IS 655-Chapman ct al. VS. Doray.
lie. 656-Sehofeld VS.. Doray.
IS.76i-Hick VS.. Thomas.
Is S7S-Sis.on vs.. Dennis.
IA 07q-Whaley vs.. Cavanaugh-
IL f72-Eby VS. Board Of school Trustees
l4.001-Mason vs.. Vestal
i40oi-McCoy vs. Southern Pacific Company
10 i6s-Bates VS.. Gregory ct al;
19.5ei-In re Vance tcoDiempt.
l3.645-Burgel ct a.. vs.. PriSser.
MONDAY, NOVEMBER q, 1890.
Is 6i6-In re Denneiy in insolvency.
IA -22- National Bank OF D. o. Mills vs.. Uniof
Company Of San Francisco.
1sS22-Fs,ate Of CaTmody.
IS.gjS-COaper rs. Cooper.
10 g5S-Cavanagh VS., CasSelman.
I3.s7S-Niller vs.. Mayo.
IS.979-Estate of Bauquier.
Is03i-BFiSon vs.. Brlson.
H,g76-PeOpie ex rel. Lame vs.. iyrreii'
I4O5s-Grimshaw VS.. Belcher ct al.
l4oS0-Estate Of BauqOier