New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1890-10-29
THE COURTS.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISIONS.
Navy HANDED DOWN By EACH DIVISIoN-CAsES
ARGUED.
Albany, oct. 23.-In the Court of Appeals to-day

Navy HANDED DOWN By EACH Dl|lSlON-CASrS
ARGUED.
Albany. oct. 23.-In the Court OF Appeals to-day
,,o t,l,slns decisions were HANDED down:
rho Fist National Bank, # nloucc'tcr. respondent
act Joun Cox, etc solomon humphrey aud another
rn T,ilr,ad Company ct al. MJtion for rarsuIneht
Senicd, with costs. - ,.
at S,cpben CU;TSey. Notion dismiss granted
Sssih costs OF appeal and $40 cost of motion ,,
' H. NTTGIS ,d s c M,p' MDti5n a. ss place IN cal
cnoar MED. Without costs. -,.-
Company t. acquire land. order affirmed, with cost
james G. Alhen ct al. respondents, agt Robert n
Judgment Of The Circuit Court On the verdict arhied'
"l Augustus W Palley. respondent agt the Brooklyn
CITY Railroad Company Henry H. Dukes; resp1ndent'
at the Eastern Dlsillng Company John Wilson,
r1rs,'pondent, sgt James A.. Wilson ct al; E0teua I.
Eh ird NS aPpptan Sss HAIRY Harry moor:
the National Thread Company, respondent AL Inc Inc
Mansfield silk and Thread Company ann arO'her, ap
n"liunts: jacob Cartwright, RESPONDENT agt the VII
e Of Mount yGrnOG %PpeWn .3 D %ppa Mae e.
Herbert ct al. respondents. agt. John w. Aten ap
pelan; Francis H. Terry. respondent at the Man.
spondent agt the New ORR, LAKE Erie and Western
aad Company , appellant JH'2 % WceNs TSs
Wnrv J. LTnch re, p ndcnt agt. he Brooklyn City
railroad Company; appellants Emil orect ct a. ap
Jamaica AID Brnoklyn Road C.mrany a2pelln.i; at
the City of BOoklyn, re, pondcnt> Patrick fahcrN
t"ir.r = I!a.,c IT al. appellants agt. t,ann r.
Ie,lic impcadcd. etc. respondents; William u, hHyGc
Of ALL >pDndents. a1i Jennie e. L. Auaiis' ''Po'a'
Judgment aiirmcd. with c'~tN. -, A., p.oo,,,rr
John l.. Crlighcad. resp adcni. agt thc Bro9Niy n
CIV railroad Company appellant INDICTMENT r,
vcred and new trial granted. cost TO abide inc event
Ann Maria Pa.m"r. aplcli nj az. r!"'yo II, son.
respondent JHdSmeit a,r''en AM in ,j"n with
SOuie Ordcru iOI u'io'i"'''' VII '''F''
'o'. SS,nhl, Luhrs respondent. ac. Anna LuhrS. APP
I.d ~ Y Il, n
"cni ordered upon rIct al special Term, Win costs
To defendant IN all courts.
The following ca-eS were argued:
Cha-ls W. Wing. respondent, agt. Bernar"o
Dcar.orta and others. appellants. ,,. .-. ,.oo.,,
TIrar nierh and others, respondents aSt. "c"rSo
= Ramsey. app liant.
L. In nh Elrf,tr and another appellants. ar John b.
Wcl,r ~urN vor. etc. respondent, and iohn H. Wcler
survivor. etc.: respondent AZ Joseph har'c'' anu
W,a,c i s"n. appellants. AIT. Frederick Walsh
and n .r- ~, pond MS.
am r,,c d,v cal!ud:.r for tom Is follows: Mos
el3 ~ ~" 40. 400 49,. - and 400.
1, tho Second Division to-day tho following decisions
were handed down:
M,re,-ct d. Grlswold rr> pendent. aCt. the Metro
- ,i'I,, Ery,trd Earnad Company ana IL" Manhattan
iialrod Company, app Hints. Mo IN To anne +;
mi,;l,ur trd ~ a. Ia lri SIS In this colrt 20
pp.;!ants IN Tie event Of all ailrmaic' OF inc JUG
%irnacl McCqrty 70 pondcnt act. James A. o'lIar
,p,'eI,aIit: Edward Ga'ir respondent act. the CITY
OF inlal. appellant Adophn~ d ,,rau; ana ON IN r., r.
r. ~ ~ XcES ,rh Horace l.. CaAin and Others ap-
pcll,nt>. agt. william Il. Hoorum aud others Jonn
Snlh,an aud an"i r appcl5n~ az tlo prI , s,
another. aprant,. art lrn .c,'itirr; t 5.mC
Dre,cr r.. poudcrt. a:t. th' lnit"f >'a'I Fl'rni"
re-, afdcn All Cha-c> y. ,hcpHaM Dcntn G; MA
rowAn arpll'n AT; Lex, ~ 'ln 4 ' tc IrSa
r,r AID .rycn,h lvrnir Pail."ad Company: Robert
raNtr Respondent at Charles = Si'ltl ana "' WI,
ra,c J. kcE rS,p"pd"T' W HT E ama an e. a-
Patrick Kelly. rr,pond~nt r. Ipr .ng s %, re
spindcn,s Judgment affirmed. with c@,,Ir, T., .,o
matter o, the anriraon Of Henry Jacohy f,r VII
81 pl'crnq'vc inandanr drccrh t" NE
h' W r fi,,I," r.spnndrit at TIE Citv Il Lock
pcr,, appellant l.hso" reversed NJ" '"''' q '"
,ucn,t Eicrrr ct al r,po"ecnt| at the HoaT'
Of ii'-,tS Of the town Of Ncwtowf, appellant Ap
rc,i Il sui. ,cd without roi> -.
Wi,I,,m r. Lawrence aud another. respondents agt;
Aron w. Ila"rsln APP To- 70 tc ?T t ~yr, nnlrst
,, u,,jutig wi,hin tw"rty DAYS stpula"S 70 r%fir"
,ho Judgment by deduct nc thrrcirom ~ 49, WIN h
uIcrt from -o; inrlT rs affirmed ci' without costs
re following cases were argued in the Second
Division: A.,
Caroline W. Lawrence ct al. respondents agt. inc
SARATOGA Lake Railway 'omrany, appc''A" D''
PANEL II. thinner. appellant. at. David settle
VI a. i,, f '"l.,,l administrator. etc. aprc'l1T
art tho Ncy York. NcwIavcn and Hartford RaIlroN'
'Hpn.,, irrtI nnpol'art aci Oliver G. Merritt,
Icrr j. sullivan and rnoihrr executors ana another
r,ro"d mt. :nlmi,tci' ro-,,o.,, c,c rcsr,ndcn..
A. 'I il cola % al >i@& f@lrsrapi Company A.
anpo!llut;. Alarmed hv default with cost. ,., 4.
.oCiai"n II TIaIldriphi,, ppc.llnt. -, -,
John IIIrdmln ct a., aplrlilhiN' AL iiehry W.
Following i, the second Division day calendar for
to norrow No,. 900, l.O7l los. 1904. 1910,
i.O77, 1,O7' and l,o7".