The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1890-09-25
local COURTS.
int Kilgen Dismissed
Is Justice Miller.
Is BANNED ~ TIME.


1o1teial Op1e1on upon No
- ths Csss-whsrs ~
r1inssss HaiIs short
II 0sorgs J. KiIssn called IN
1osb court yestefday. charged
11r bTick building less than
- thick, contrary to the city
Was dismisssd - having no
- seton.
IN block has been : subject Of
~ and controversy Of late. Com
- mads By the contractors Of
I'm building. which IL going up
r. ~ corner Of Second and James
66]oining. In excavating for
~ building the foundation
x1een building wAs said
enfo, and 70 guard against /
- seemsd very probable, line
nn-tos and props was pissed
20 1e6inst the south wall. a few
- 1lio1 the inner wall Of the Smith
- - nsafly ten feet, the bath
~ Turkish bath company Ia the
1I6e forced the wall out Ct ieast
3lT1D ma the forcs Of the water
11naeod the first and the second
RI : new building mentioned. The
I'D 4 necesAnry for the work
= r. ~ ouny portion Of The wall Of
1fne, r. controversy and recon-
~ ~ city council have had .
ton "a the feasibility Of having
f11ins tpsn down, and the result OF
1694 oction before Justice Miller
q r16f16r IL some interest
&ln1o 4 fhe walls MAS not brought up
1S RI oouEt, and did not figure in the
lk 81 speaking on the subject ves-
- r. iuotice said: 'sThe ordinance
n - provides that the 6rst story
Buildings, coming under
- 1Ino Of enumerations, shall
S15on inches In thickness.
- second story twelve
- Is section does not include
- IN TT such use the defense alleg-
- - King MAS erected, and since that
u rs buildinss II not included in the
m loomseations, / regarded It q quite
4 a ~ attendants favor.
70, -, The Same section reads that
okali commence against the builder
fl twolyo months after the erection Of
tine. and that Il proven guilty he
II lned fox committing misdemear
Is u this case the building In question
49, Up nearly two years. and 10 there
6e1ompt from litigation In that line. 1t
- up long enough almost 70 bar
slnno ssems to b no alternative but
1etke building down. II should never
IN IN erected, and II shows : lack Of
|GF dther On the part Of the building I'M
c1of q his deputy"
IuHAHMoNIous nEIGHDons.
I'm WILSON, was arraigned before Just
ltvtts yesterday on complaint Of II. J.
ibst. who charged him with threaten-
~ tAL Il was proven that the parties
= 70 suit wers neighboring farmers, living
t three miles from Slaughter, aud that
Ch-ond-tumble light and wrestling
- tDok place between the two q re-
fef the defendant shooting Z hoe BE-
no 70 the plaintiff The court found
here was no cause for action and dis
NOD the defendant
HsHc1ED YRoM cAR
y. Rasks, Z second street electric lire
1oluotor, was arraigned before Justice
Iaer yesterday on . charge Of assault and
|lely. preferred by Mr.. D. 8. Hyde.
discrimination was . long one and many
nesses were examined, who testified
they saw the plaintiff pay his fars and
saw him ejected from the car.
ease Win b continued this morning.
wuIrecnAPEL THUGS sESrKNcKD.
1ndgs Humes yesterday sentenced John
Nh 70 seven years Ct hard labor In the
~ penitentiary ct Walls Walla Charles
EGnard pleaded guilty to the charge Of
nnry and was sent up for ono year.
- disposes Of the three men who. on the
~ Of 81 ptember Z. waylaid and robbed
O. 6osland, an inoffensive laborer, in the
leas u : saloon in Whitechapel. Joseph
oaklsy plead guilty and was sentenced to
MA PEARS; Welsh nearly escaped, but
~ apprehsnded by the police. stood trial
~ COT seven years. The state viii get
Man years of labor for that $40 taken
ion 0esland.
S1rEHlVk COuHI--HUAkosJ De
Nunson q Custer vs.. Anna e. Galloway
~ Huber and Standardization for Z
11 tial set for September n.
bats Of Washington W. Charles Leonard
- John Welsh-Leonard pleaded guilty,
1neencsd to one year In penitentiary, and
Neleh sentenced TO seven years.
1lets Of Washington vs.. N. r. Butts
Hill
esass Of Washington W. Eugene Cullety
-bcnds for appearance.
SUPERIOR coURT-LIcHrENBERe,J J.
1 Soeephine B. Mum melip vs.. Alfred Num-
Modified order granted. allowing an
Neneg's lee OF SIS.
lanes Campbell VS.. Andrew Lett-Con-
mud until Thursday, October 80.
Nssson 4 Post W. Seattle Building and
..eauiacturing Company ct al.-Cause
epped from calendar at cost Of defend
lazy ]. Baldwin VS.. William L. Baldwin
-Amdavit filed and order of default.
0ofEe n. Richardson vs. James Duvall
vfuer nled reversing decision of lower
PROBATE COURT.
!. hstase OF Charles L. Clark-Inventory
49,: Order appointing appraisers d. A.
-eAensie. L. E. Corley and George I. Gill
non.
!. ssale OF Amos Burgurt-Hearing on Pc
Tor family allowance. Order setting
: stock of $500 and $50 per month for
,eport of family.
s.eass OF Henry +. Cohrs-Hearing of
.enon Tor probate of will. Decree admitt-
Wi to probate and appointing Marie
IA executrix without bond.
Z .asets OF Joel Mack-Petition for sale OF
essate. Order to show cause.
UNITED STATES COURT.
sonn 3 Day and Michael Day. partners,
ens an action of libel against the
ef Gypsy Queen. her tackle. apparel
~ furniture" The plaintiffs claim the
- OF 81 s0S AZ from tha ovnar. <,f ~.