The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1890-05-28
THE SUPERIOR COURT
Harrington 4 Smith Get the
Coppin Water Works.
DAMAGES AGAINST 4 CABLE co.
sshs stsssss Gsts Twenty Five Dollars
fer Psrsosai lsyari~s-sew ssiss
rfled-B1ottes.
DAMAGES AGAINST 4 cAsLE CO.

su1k1 A1cneenperH yesterday arrived o .
oecss.on IN the important casa Of Charles
Corpdn N Harrington 4 smith. in favor
@ ne defendant. the court holding that
ne Warranty deed executed By the plaintiff
Vas N absolute couvsyancs. and not .
mortgage. - Coppin claims. The court
Was occupied nearly I'll day With the ex-
ANIMATION OF witnesses Tor the defense. and
ths hearing Of The arguments. II was
shown that 1t the tine OF the execution OF
the deed IN 1884. shs plaintiff was indebted
to the defendants ~. coo and that the pro-
perty conveyed vas worth about ti5.coo.
Coppin had been borrowing money for the
construction Of his water works. and was
very DESTROYS of comprising them
beang then, - he supposed, hope
tessly III. be aeeded the
property TO Harrington 4 Smith. With the
agreement between them that they we're TO
support him du ing the remainder of his
life md bury him by the side Of his wife
hen he died. The bookkeeper OF the firm
testified that when the deed vas made the
account with Coppin was closed up. The
defsndants' answer called for IN account
ing OF the rents of the premises which
were 10 b paid to Harrington & Smith.
and alleged that the money had not oil
been paid over. This part OF the case was
dropped
sTRrcK NJ GARBAGE wAaoy.
The case OF John Stanton vs. the Seattle
Construction Company. suit for personal
damages. was tried before Judge Stra,son
yesterday. The plaintiff claimed that last
October he was riding on the dummy Of
the Yesles avenue cable line, and was
~kar
wagon, brnising his leg. The jury returned
verdict for the plaintiff for SIS.
TEE CASE or MAwsos vs. HoIpEy sEcrS.
The trial OF the case o. Louis r. Mawson
vs.. Charles p. Holden. the disagreeing pro-
priesors OF the Zsriins saloon, was begun
before Judge Erntenberg In the afternoon,
aud viii be resumed this morning This is
. suit for an accounting. and the closing Of
the affairs OF the alleged partnership. The
defens ant claims that the plaintiff was not
. partner, bur vas working on Z salary.
with the understanding that he was to
have half interest when he had paid
for L.
JUDGMENT NJ CONSENT.
Judge L;chtenherg. by consent of the
parties. granted John Benson judgment
for $525 and costs against J. d. Harrigsn.
4 RECEIVER APPOINTED.
James r. McElroy was appointed re-
ceiver by Judge Lichtenherg 70 take the
rents OF the sub-senants of Michael Phil
lips. His bond was fixed At -, COO
NEW ATTORNEY.
George w. Rose. holding Q certificate
from the supreme court of Illinois, was al
rnisted to the bar Of King county by Judge
6traston upon motion Of A. &. Gilman.
MISCELLANEOUS FILINGS.
John CARPENTER fled against William A.
Richie . suit for Judgment for $33l.50 on
. Judgment for that amount obtained
against the defendant in the district court
Of Cowlev county, Kan, last January.
James p. Stewart. in . complaint against
David II. Cradle. alleges that he paid for
the defendant into the Home Mutual
Building and Loan Association OF Ale
gheny City. Pa. $Sss49. and prays judg-
ment for that amount.
H. Levy, OF San Francisco, filed Q COM
plant against George E. Baker in a suit
for $26a.5s. . claim for goods sold 10 de-
PENDANT
Fred L. Stinson has sued Schmitx for $500
claimed on promissory note.
A suit for the foreclosure Of q mortgage
OF So 600 was flied by Ambrose Chi,tendon
against A. W. Hight and the Salmon Bay
Lumber Company.
Rowe. Stone & Carr obtained judg-
ment by default against the Puget Sound
Tea. Cotsse aud Spice Company for 1897 90.
Oh the plaintiffs claim. $50 was on che OK
executed by the defendants manager.
which was no. paid for want OF funds. and
the remainder for the pay ment Of buggy.