The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1890-05-07
- atssrnsys say what Certain Ser
v~vs worth-Ths ssssves
navercs Csss-New Suits.

- ID = oyPOsscssSSs 49, WutSo
ln66ed to as the actual case Of the do
- 81 Fred II. Peterson. This hypo-
<;'1,ni eaue submitted to each attorney
~ celebrated case OF Annie Goltsch
1l1tahiss Goltsch. worked up BY
- 4 Fsben In October. l8sS. the
a1fne details Of which were given In
lno1-lrrELLIGEscER 1t the time. and
~ vers, briefly. a. follows:
1r1hias (;oltsch absconded from Chi.
~ S4,g25 Of his wife's money, which
"a on deposit In bank, and came to
<7a1a His wife followed him and gave
fEfv - 70 Peterson g. Faben 10 recover
4 uRsree coincidence in the case was
p Matthias Goltsch had previously am
II 800 ~ same hrm TO draw up some pa
- Nm. Goltsch gave them = retainer
|<3Tp ID III interview with the abscond-
IA husband the attorneys obtained his
1nrujon that he had all OF the money ~
end b. bis wife. An action for crimi-
|211 reinstatement was brought against
b 1suh and be was locked up in jail. The
& 9nsys were ct loss a. 70 how they
= proceed 70 find the funds. After
E llkias was safely lodged in jail it oc-
& IN TO Attorney Peterson that tho
61oy might possibly be kept in deposit
p, nd that II the culprit was released he
~ 20 after tho missing treasure.
oosch warrant was procured and
800 released from custody and shad-
~. A suspected. he went to the safe
1uesit vault and opened his boz, which
nod him and took possession Of the
6nIunts of the box. which consisted OF
-, mortgages and cash to the amount Of
Nm. which with the interest due
1neunted 70 1886. 1t WAS decided to
tsu up . complaint for . civil suit Of At
tnkmsnt, under the law OF Illinois for the
potsction Of married women, 10 be
toueht should the criminal suit for en-
toulamsnt not stick. This required bond
I 10000. The plaintiff had no friends
IN. and the attorneys secured bondsmen
fkh3 On their own responsibility. Goltsch,
= 4 was feared. was not held on the
ainina charge. Immediately upon his
n1Daee from custody and regaining his
tuopurs, the sheriff levied the attachment
spun IL money. This case never came to
~, but was settled between the parties,
~ plaintiff giving her husband 81 800. and
sting the balance OF the money, and also
rtllng Relino of his half-intsr-
q IN lot worth 5000. which they held
jihtiy.s The attorneys placed their claim
h ises ct $1,000. and paid all expenses.
amounting to Sis. The suit Is now
hesght BY the plaintiff TO recover 81 ,020.
n altorneys examined today gave the
tSIowing estimates as to what would be .
III remuneration in the case: Il. +.
nains, $3.50 to $500; J. c. Haines,
MOO to 1900; Judge Rochester, 81 500 TO
00o0; +. H. Peterson. $1,000; J. G. Prev
& 81 80 to $1,000; r H. J. Penncfather,
Q,0Qo; ]. H. Allen, $3.50: General Tur-
~, 81. 800 to $2,000.
JuDoE ncHrENBrRe's DEPARTMENT.
he divorce suit OF Mary A. Sleeves W.
]. A Sleeves was before Judge Lichtenberg
- greater portion of yesterday, and the
leefing was not completed at the hour OF
eajoufnment. A minute report Of the tcs-
enony elected by the examination OF the
lAinttf and defendant would be master
~ Of vile realism. The plaintiff testi-
lushand she had been subjected TO
ead and brutal treatment by her husband,
I'D that he had smirched her character by
eAArttng her with adultery with Joel
nalock. The husband charges her with
valul desertion. and swears 10 the tact of
nndelity. She states that her husband has
ptopefty worth $l3,e00: that $4,000 OF IL
sneir joint earnings. and that she has .
mall pisce Of land which will yield an
neome Of only $50 per year. and that she
ennot sell this without the signature of
- husband. Mrs. Sleeves, when she
nalssed her present husband. In lsSs, was
sSldow with six children. Her preceding
susband's name was Dunlap. There is
- important witness yet to. examine.
ia case will be disposed Of this morning.
The Builders Material Company was
nsnsed Judgment of sa77 against George
k1esn.
Judgment for plaintiff for $3.50 was
seand By Judge Lichtenberg in the case Of
nan Z Paulson Furniture Company vs..
Amsda c. Mcdonnell.
me City OF Seattle obtained judgment
,of Was against II. II. Runnelis before
Jedes Lichtenberg.
'edee Lichtenberg yesterday ordered
~ William Anderson be appointed re-
eevsf TO take charge of the partnership
r0psfty of Mswson & Holden. of the Ter.
" eaioon. to examine their hooks and ac-
sn0 and continue the business. Ills
eoads were fixed at $2,ooo.
.JcneE arMEs' DEPARTMENT,
Inc entire day was consumed in Judge
eames' department with the hearing of q
samase suit between two Italian ranchers
-Vrando Rossi VS.. Lavina Marino. They
ssn adjoining farms in township2s. While
burning slashing ON Marino's farm the
-. @es spread over Rossi's ranch. doing
I'D damages TO fruit trees and fences
essed by plaintiff at $ian A motley
oosd OF Italian witnesses gave their testi-
.ons Tor both sides in their operate
vefnacnlar. which was taken by an inter
Ssser. The jury returned a verdict for
pea,ntid for SEQ.
ATTORNEYS ADMITTED.
Judge w. r. Henderson of the supreme
oufs Of Arkansas. was admitted to the bar
. voc superior court OF King county on
- Souon OF Judge Humphries. by Judge
Tsssts1on yesterday. Judge Henderson, was
United States judge Of New Mexico under
sssseasnd, and was formerly attorney
eenefai of Arkansas.
.nomass c. Mcnivist. holding certificate
ns supreme court Of Colorado. was adj
ls'ed 70 the bar by judge Lschtenberg,
sPos motion of ], X. Brown.
NEW FILINGS.
s. saaa A Cheadle has brought suit for
'o'ee against Ernest X. chesdle. 10
~Sota she was married in ISIS. n San Diego
saey removed to this CITY in ISIS, where
= nave since resided. The plaintiff COM
r.sas mat her husband has been from the
Inning OF their married life cruel and