Burlington weekly free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1866-1928, 1890-09-26

]
Il. J. Gleason, Waitsheld, rep am not in
favor of repeating the prohbtory law.
! y. u. Bailey, Woodbury., rep, No.
J.. D. Mute, Marshfeld, rep. No Stree do
| l.. j. Bartlett Plainneld, rep no, am not
! In favor, Of repeating it. think the law is all
! rRnl. The trouble is with the people. They
/ don't enforce the law.
George e, Ware. Brooklne rep so; but
/ would have 1t so amended as to make it the
/ duty or some one to put the law in force and
/ TO atiN such fines rs would prohibit instead Of
| licensing
j. VI. Powers, Athens rep I do not
/ Alonzo Stcbbns, Vernon, rep do not.
Daniel Shcrwin. Jamaica, rep.-No. with
we liberal sprinkliug Of democrats in the
| liouSc, am looking for a desperate effort To
! change from prohibition to license, but do not
/ thlnk the change can be mado
II. Phelps. Grafton, rep. ! do not as now
Jerome Morgan Barnard, rep.--No.
). G.. Burnett. Bethel. rep. no.
| w. w. Manning. Weston, rep.-No.
! Henry Boyuton Woodstock, rep. No.
w. D. Johnson, Bridgewater, rep do not
/ favor its repeal.
/ +. A. keler, Rochester. rep. favor no
| CnNhse m our prohibitory laws, except such as
man make their enforcement less difficult,
/ ana thtlr penalties more certain.
/ H. +. labaree Hartland, rep do not favor
repeAi. would rather favor les.-lati "a that
/ would make tho law more stringent than at
| present. would favor an amendment to the
/ present license law FOR medicinal and me-
gaanicaI purposes, SO that if minority were
towns should not be obliged to appoint agents
for that purpose
James +. Pollard Chester rep most Ger
/ tunly shall oppose the repeal Of tho present
I urohibitory Ipv a. belinv. thaf the main
! opposition to 10 is owing TO its being too sue
caastu' IN attaining the object, for which it
George \. Hubbard. Guildhn)l rep am
not in favor Of the repeal Of the present pro-
hibitory law.
/ r. Frizyai r,,.,r r., ,,, ,, ,r
f.,1r rf r' ~ - III ~, III
law. AVID were I To ftvora chance il would be
To make the present Law more stringent
it. back If 6I l'I,iiicni We
H. - Chamierfin. Bradford. Farmers league
ANA tpl.p.I,uco man and do not favor
the repeal ot the present law.
/ I,a.H t..' i,' vs. ". ',u' 'o,l' ~
IN; ito ',' Al '",, ~, ~ e rep, "lu mo'
.rr.loW ~ il1 =" MI 'r',eut t,l" itt,,-
G,.9l, 't" ,.u ~ repeated "'u'u hot SUBSTITUTE
i,,,i,..., t,...,:........ D..
,.. "a, I IS,,i - u't'"Hvon' mop no
in furor of repeal, but link tie law ca" can be be-
Three replies were not signed but the nm
.,,.. ,...,,i..., =. y -
., w. W '"' '"e.'' anu
TO INC Ii!Id, NOT II II can he enforced,
otherwise would. \ high license local
o,tiop Io,v v,o,l ,,,,,,,i,l g,
wa o"''i "'''
: rurr ARE Nopr ,t, rree t>-nrrt,.trt-
entirely nm eli el So 1nr 5s tlr.e mater. r,.
concerned. made uo pledges of any dcscrfp-
/ ton ia advance OF my election. ana would
Inc III come, M, Tor ,i.Cr,-.i,n in the i,,
h. f . t.t ' .Ai } - 90. 90 H'leYer seems
/ ~ 81" 80 ''''' Il, 4"i7''
fine renaal ~ M I'd" mi it'or
a,,v unia-. IL c,I a. WAX i!a. , XXX
w.. ~, o,.. ,a l "'S III '''' w. nv 'i'"v
ain. ro,tr,I ti ~. " ~ ii', =" IA "io' e'iN'U u
- E. t,-, ''|"o'' .r..
~ We N'oV' w Hoc4". n uoHl' MINK nor sir.
/ george - i)av q. DduN,lle, dem No, not
/ gh.,9 u can Dc ameAuea 50 as to be more ct-
lee, uj"'
/ -; l., ,aH los' richmond; rep am IN faVor