Arizona weekly journal-miner., 1890-10-08
E CHALLENGE TAEM TO SHOW
 IHE RECORD.

fE CHALLENGE THEN TO SHOW
 IhE RECORD.
 No. wlihstanding the fact that the FhenIx Gazette malieiously talsi6es in |ublishlng what purports to have been fi introduced in last legislature, and |gocseds to give the vote on 1t by plac- ng every republican member on record s voting in favor Of il and the demo- |rsts as voting against it. we reassert bat no such biIl was ever introduced. Ne 6efy both or either the Gazette CT Courier 10 find any record O: 1t in the bu.ns!s of the legislature. The lie as Ii ppesss in the Gazette is SO bare faced nd bsldheaded that no one could fail p recognize it as such. The impr nt of bisebood stands out in bold relief in very line, every word, every syllable nd 0n every letter efthe Gazete's arti- le. Without consulting the journals of lc last legislature jus. stop to think. Al he time that bills were being intro aced in the legislature, C. Meyer Zu- ck. New Jersey democrat was gov nor. The administration had given C intimation as ye, whatever of its in e3ded policy, as to removal of territorial ticeEs. Ii was not known but Gov sns- Zalsck might be allowed to remain office for m ouths or possibly a year b assert that republican would intro bee bill of this kind, giving demc- stic governor such powers. and that he republicans in the council would pie fcs such a measure and three dem -rsts should oppose t, would brand c ulue as the most profound political cls Of the age, and the three democrats the three greatest monstrosities Of the Ee The IouRNAL-MINER still talks Of rmocratic Tecklessness in making as TEions aud dsres the Courier CT Ga ite te find she record Of such pro- teding ID the legislative journals. That ur readers may know fully to what ex- |eraes oi malicious falsisying democratic apers are capable of going, we repro nce the article as II appeared in the azeue and of which GUT democratic >1-smpor4ry in Prescott spprovingly EYs
 Now comes the Gazette, with copy
 the biIi full proof that i, IS the Iber fellows wbo are lying low in this snpsign. Cheyuey. Moore and ali publican councilnen voted for the Il Every democratic councilman pted against it"
 Here IS the brazen article as 1t appear n the Gazette:
 George Cheyney when member of last legislative council introduced ba voted for the iolloy;sg rsscaliy easure: 'Tbe goyernoF IS hereby em- s~ered to hIl, by appointment, any cancy that msy happen iu any territo- ! or county office for the unexpired rn of such otflce, when no other pro kiou of iaw is made ter that purpose. may also remove any such office, for alect os duty or misconduct, when in opinion the public good requires ch removal. Such removal shall be boa notice Of the grounds upon 6ict such removal is sought to be zde, and 2 hearing thereon, al such me. znd iu such manner and form, as eoverncr may prescribe. He may Q remove such officer for utter incom- Etency to discharge the duties of his ice The bill passed the council by e following vote, ayes - Cheyney. oore, Dunlap. Peter. Hardy, Dornng- and Sloan, all republicans. Noes enb. Orne. Simpson and Hosdly,
 democrats IL Sill be seen from this
 and the vose upon its passage that republicans 70 man were Tn favor
 e1acting .sS which would give the bveTnUr power to remove any county beer =hieh he in bis psT,:-sn judg- ent may deem necessary, or in other orss the ensctmeut of such an infamous
 efi the various county and precinct Soers absolutely al the mercy Of a rsissa governor. No one but Poli,i-
 vampire would ever introduce or pport such scoundrelly measure, and g people of Arizona will see that such en are not given again an opportunity promulgste such schemes"