Evening capital journal. (Salem, Or.) 1888-1893, 1890-10-23
CIRCUIT COURT.
Doings Since Last Repsrs- rs-Civil and
Criminal Cases-llenry Pulshy
Acquitted, Etc.


Burnett, vs Geo II Jones ct nj,
Tilmon Ford; motion 10. leave
to issue execution.
In this case the jury brought In
a verdict in favor of the plaintiff
Michser ON every point.
Granted until to.morr " to file
motion for new trial.
State vs. Henry Pulsky on indict-
ment for larceny from store.
The jury In this case were ou,
only u few minutes when verdict
OF acq initial was returned. Tilmon
Ford and W. III. Holmes conducted
the defense ahd did 1t with great
ability and good management. The
circumstances looked n little dark
against the accused, but the facts
have to be beyond cavll before q
jury will convict this term. In
this instance Henry Pulsky, Of Ger
vais, an old French soldier of the
Crimean war, was accused by
farmer named Dubois of stealing a
pocket.book and So out of his
pocket, while he was trying on
new suit of Clothes In Mckinley
Mitchell's store. The constable
with search warrant found in
Pulsky's room pOcket-book which
Dubois identified IA the one he had
lost, but at the trial Pulsky swore
he had had the pock et-book twenty
years and his son identified 1t as
one long in the family. The jury
could not see enough IN the case
upon which to base a conviction.
THURSDAYS PROCEEDINGS
AT ga. m. IA hack containing the
grand jury started Oh its rounds to
make the semi.annual Official visit
at county and state institutions.
The honorable body proceeded to
the poor house aud thence to the
hospital for the insane.I
IN COUkI.
NJ Kaminsky, Ford 4 Kaiser VI
NJ Gerschback action for money
Continued.
. Florence Mccoy, Darcy
Knight & Murphy. vs. James y
Smith. 1imon Ford; damages.
Continued.
0 Dittenhofer & Haas, Sandersor
Reed, VS. Donald McDonald; NC
tion for money.
? Continued.
5 & Edgar,et al, Bingham. Ham
I ner Il Williams, VS. Susan Edgar
ct al, Biiyeu * L Ford; partition
Dismissed at cost of plaintiff.
II John $ Duclos. Miller & Osborn
vs. James Walton, Geo H Bur
nett; equity.
Referred to W p Williams to TAX,
f and report testimony.
l. l. Rowland VS. F o McCOwn
Argued on motion to set aside
: verdict and for Judgment for defend
4 ant. Melton overruled aud judg
nj mt rendered Oh verdict fo
/. plaintiff.
d First National bank va Dorrancs
Lu nber anu Mfg Co.
Arsuei on motion to strike Out
? part of answer. Motion OveTruled
5 In tie matter of the assignment
o. E. Ebelhard. Order for assigne,
D t, pay creditors dividend Of 10 pc
}. cent.
As School dist No 76, J J Murphy
VS. l. Fl Ponjade ct al, Burnett
Z DARCY & Bingham; action fo
money.
Settled and dismissed.
70 Marx & Jorgenson, Silvcrstone
Murphy d Brodie, vs. A w La
s RocYue, et al; partition.
e Referred to NJ. L. POpue to tax,
g and report testimoDy-continued.
5, Marx & JOrgensen, SiIverstone
/ Murphy 81 BrOdie, Va A T. La
y Rocque ct al, Ford d Kaiser
partition.
Dismissed.
Hughes vs. Strang.-Judgment OF
verdict. Hughes gets $50 and hal
tn C ,sts to pay, the verdict being
less than $50.
State VS. james Burke; Indictment
for larceny from the person, In tht
stealing of silver watch; appear d
in person aud ny J A Carson, attOr.
ney. who entered "a plea Of guilty
and asked the leniency of the court,
as 1t was the result of drinking
spree. Sentenced to one year in the
penitentiary.
; State vs. John Sing; indictment for
sodpmy; ] A Carson appeared for
defendant and pleaded not gnlliy.
Trial SET for Friday at ] o'clock
p. m. m
State vs. VIM Cole; indictment
for larceny from the person; & J.
Hayden appeared for defendant:
allowed to plead guilty TO simple
larceny. Fined $50, which defend
ant thinks he can raise.
State vs. A Alpin; Indictment for
carrying concealed weapons. Fined
$40 on plea Of guilty, aud fine paid.
81 J e Chamberlain, Ford 4
Kaiser, vs Town Of WOODBURY.;
writ OF review.
Argued on motion TO dismiss;
motion overruled. Now being ar