Democratic Northwest. [volume] (Napoleon, Ohio) 1869-1894, 1890-05-08
"fTTERuUER GEORGE"
His Campaign Document F!
For Which the County Paid +.
$443.50!
The County Robbed Of that
Amount I!
By the Poe Russell Gang |!


t-.s 10 a.F .ser-- - ]
NAPOLEON, o., May lst, 1890.
Hon. Z. W. Poe. Auditor Of State:
In compliance with your order directed TO me Of
Feb sth, 1890, after hrst being duly sworn, pro.
decided at once to Napoleon, Henry county, Ohio,
arriving here on Feb 10Th, lSS0, ana presented my
/. q, Waltimlre, County Treasurer, and at oDce
entered on the duties Of the examination Of said
Offices As set forth in your order. s
ABSTRACTS OF TAXES.
first examined the abstracts Of the county from
ISs0, TO 1889, inclusive, and made Q comparison u
amounts as totals ON abstract, with amounts
copied on first line Of the several settlement sheets,
and fo-nd them TO correspond, except In the year
fo8a The abstract for this year not being on nle.
However from rechpiulaton sneets o. me vAiues q
vear the total valuation of the county for 1888 was
m ia 0si co. Taking this as baeis and taking the
State school levy Of mill, produces tax Of $6,-
7b269 Row BY appealing to settlement sheets for
the wear 1884 the State School fund is credited with
rss. .752 66 and from said comparison ! feel conf
dent the amount as reported on said sheet are
correct then compared the totals at bottom OF
each settlement sheet with amounts charged to the
reEuectiye funds on county fund book. In 1881 the
Aforesaid totals on settlement sheet and fund book
aqree. In 1882 they also agree by taking the
srsdas. sS both svies being Included in bridge col
umn. In 1883 thsy agree BY taking the same COM
bination for bridge funds, also, county and town
ehip road levies united. In 1854 the same com.
binations exist And agree. Lhe EenruAry sneet "
fsnd and county road fund together. But the Aug.
sheet and CHARGES ON fund book do not agree and
viii here give the settlement sheet total:
Poor Bridge.
q.tlrnnt aheet Co fund 46 404T6 S58952 S1002l. go
wand hook - 6,42S.44 1886 9.926. 20
- - -
ctv,pv the difference &6t.32 $3.50 $94.7n
= - ,,,nd. and sa,a .attlemept sheet and
IN these an a, a snrd coiiscied ot thia
fund Dook 40 no' Asi'' :" my -uA''
Bettlement; !;n. sh.s,. for ,sse .Uree with fund
cS sscsnt In oounty fund the sheet showing there
neg nesh ~ sns ~ md there n charged 10 said
and N Aagus, - Tt copIactor as Sos IA and
tuno on LunS s..c,, m an oH ma hinv Total of
"a n, nsor nhnrre 20 said county fund for this
year tnan s.nS.sonsrs renoyt to The Cunrt of
Tne county 81. rsno,tino their financial transao-
Common ~, ,s,tscn ~ tbs conntv Hnancea for
uous enc .sos @ rc - rr.-oco .TIc NopTHwrar N Ian
tne year aoo ~ So,n1 items snnear AZ charged
10 tn', Aoo') 'n0 io"'"s -'0o
VIZ:
To old delinquent personals ;..;;:..:... Si'So]'4
personals S,so0'ol
-
Making total eozoo'oO
DeductinR. from this amount &4,i7s,0l more
Oha CDUntY
yssr there Is balance OF "a not yet disposed
Of and cannot ind where said amount Is placed
n sny funds vet examined. The settlement sheets
far ifssr and fund book sgree % far as the funds
herssosore reported by me. will here say that ct
this fine had made NO comparison Of the local
sehool. township. corporation, and township road
funds. for the reason that the general account Of
more 10 ssy In regard to these funds later In my
rsnort. also and smother pecusiarity in the set-
Element sheet Of August 1887 on file in Auditors Of
a yis. After crediting the State funds with their
S,SFtiou Of old dsiinqnent chattles collected, In
thsnexs line below. the Auditcr also credits the
Efsts funds with e72.l3 former collection adding
!, N total column but nothing Of the kind is added
70 local funds.
The settlement sheet for 1888 and fund book en-
his wear the general ditch and county fund levies
are uned. but after the general bitches proportion
Il deducted, there is surplus yet Of tlsS0I charg-
ed 70 county fund more than collected. ! viii now
recapitulate little. Take the y1&.4S ADDED 70 tne
zkaka fup1s in August h1SB7, which m0ntton on