Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1890-07-07

I ! vOlved in all Of these cases was set
tied and compromised in puTsusnc
{ of the order Of this court, dated July
9th. IS5S, a copy OF which is at
tached hereto, and by that order I
I was authorized to dismiss the said
eases or to submit 90 decreesltherein
for the defendants. In pursuance
Of s.cia compromise the cases IN
volving personal property were after
wards dismissed and those involving
the realty were subsequently dis
posed Of by decrees in favor Of de-
PENDANTS.
1 have also brought and there ART
nOa pending I'm the First District
= Court OF Utah. at ogden. the FOL.
lowing suits: First. against Robert
McQuarrie and the Church Associa-
ton OF the Weller stake Of HiUr. in
voiying the greater part Of Block
A., Piat So Ogden City survey.
in Ogden City, and said case is at
Issue Between the plaintiff and the
I said defendants, that about April.
1890, upon application 10 the Court
for that purpose, Ogden Ciiy,a mUni-
cipal CORPORATION, was permitted %
1 ALAtA NNAAI IA EAlA AaAT@ anu ~ IL
| petition OF Intervention claims the
ownership Of the said ptgmises, and
Issue has been Joined between the
| intervenors aud the plaintiff. Sec
/ ond. against David e. Stuart. the
| Church Association Of the Weber
stake Of Zion and Ogden CITY.
| corporation, 10 recover n uarcel OF
land situate IL Ogden City, Utah,
known as the Tithing Grounds. be-
ing about twenty rods square and
! constituting 4 part Of block Is. Pit
IA This suit Is now ut issue
upon the facts. Third. an action
against Il. J. Taylor and Lewis W.
ShuTtiiff 20 recover lots S anu 9 il
block 5, Plat "B " ugCen City sur
veyt containing two acres OF land
AMI situated IN Ogden City. Thi.
case Is aisc az issue.
/ incidentally learned that there
was some property at or near
Omaha, Neb., which had at one
time belonged to and was occupied
by the late corporation, ard 7 Oh /
tanned abstracts which disclosed tina.
the property had been sold f0- taxes. |
but under the laws Of that State in 1
such cases the money can be rcfuni- |
Cd with Interest AMI the urlgerty
recovered, 80 I am informed. / sub
mitted these abstracts 70 CHIEF
Justice Zane, requesting that tine
judges Of the court, the .OverameE, |
attorney, etc, look into the matter /
rs it was probable :hat | should ask |
Tor advice in the premises. These
pIpers were only returned to me :
short time ago. and J am st!ll 81 the |
opinion that stels should be tIEeI |
70 recover that property, rs 1t j. 1
worth twenty-five or thirty thousand |
dollars. The expenEe, however, in |
the matter Of litigation viii he com.
parativcly large, and your Receiver
asks the advice Of this court upon |
the abstracts and papers submitted. /
which show for themselves.
! desire 20 call tAe especial attcu-
ton Of the court to the Items OF pX- /
pense in the matter OF herliHg sheen |
There is nothing chsrged for IN.
first yea!, es they were rented, ana |
we had but little expense such =
taxes, wages = men 10 count them.
etc, aud hsd au income ofSj2SS.e3
from them, bnt lat year the court
though. best 20 have them heTded,Or
l7,2D7 Of the $4,000, and - Uruertd.
which order I have complied with
10 the very best Of my ability BY
hiring the most experienced sheer |
men that could be got. Tie expense
for the first two months was rather
greater than afterwards, as the first |
order 10 herd only contemplated the
keeping Il the Sheep Iu this way for |
4 short time, Is a fiHa! decision IN
the United states Supreme CUuri |
was daily expected; but when We
learned tina. We would ba cumrclluJ
to keep them through the winter.
other arrangements were necessary |
and were maize, thereby lesseuiug L.
some extent the monthly average
expense. As l. well known, Lt,t
winter was very severe ami q uisas-
lrouS one 10 stpcEmcu. DuT losses
were seven thousand two hundred
aud fifty eight, including ig-su~
the summer % date. which.
however, I 90 not believe is any
5re7ter ratio 81 loss than that sus
ainei by other shccpuUa. The
'heep have jus; been sh0Fn and VT
nave thirty-sevtn thousand ci-h'
lun dred and sixty one pounds a.
WOOL, which is probably worth $500.
,nd $500 lamls PROBABLY "or.
., 800.
The cost Of herding and caring t
or these sheep. including taxes uI.
anne and purchase ~ bucks - uul
he order Of the court. aud Giupin.
md shrlriuc the same 10 faf... ne.
zen about Sl5.55n. The less 10y death
o date has been 1-5- head. Ealu, j
hese say at Sl.5l Der head, and ~, !
ave the cost ana los amounting | 4
o So, 49,, deduct -. ylJ. being i
approximately what can he goI q
srtne wool aud Increase o; lar!.-sutr
here appears 20 be "a net io.s o. sis :
81, 90 with iIsr EcI-Ja. -ll- uf h.r |
less. four wagons. three tents. fur
amp outfits AMI los head Of bucks q
N hand. II wiz ue ss-.u that I'll d
hess sheep had been Ivassd 70 even ..
weniy cents anI q sufficient BON
AIKEN rs was al hT-. Contemplated p
y the court, and 81 was done the q
revlOus year, We should have r. | "a
lied about S750tnJ on this 1T o. D
heep, thereby making a difference q,
n favor Of the fund Of s.. $500. L.
In view Of tlese facts and the !.
iT;her fact that the rauu,s are he
oming more aEi more overcrowded | g.
very year, and that these ar- q Eaol ! .,
lass OF sheep inclp1hle Of Ieing !.
loyed ~ quicSiy d private fi1cNs q
C, for these aud Tor many a;hr- l.
sasOus | would l.G-t res,Ie.ifIli,
! init TO the court that in NV UIrs- T..
tent il would bc uuwise 10 under y.
Ike 70 herd them another winter. d,
kept AZ all they should he LEASED al
nj proper bonds taken. as / aIyc- J.
lied doing last season.. rher, *.
Jwrvgr, some risk even aiaut this.
nj the grade Of the shaua when II.
lis is done IS continually going
beings 30 stimulus 10 "a
lrties leasing 20 improve the grad, C.
Hess they had them leased for a T.
Rod longer than one year. - that
my jIdgm mt they shoglI BE- sold Pa
~ the money investor m some
ing certain to pay dividends. i
Respectfully submitted.
FRANS II. DYER. =.
Receiver. o..
EECEirrs.
c.I. Rent ~ Tifhrns p
once. from J.R. Winders 20 10 "a
e. I. Gartu House. % 90 -