Pittsburg dispatch. [volume] (Pittsburg [Pa.]) 1880-1923, 1890-01-07


tiOns of local appeals. Judge Collier an'
District Attorney Johnston assume othee.
The Supreme Court, sitting at Philadel
phia yesterday, handed down q number o
decisions possessing vital interest to west
ern Pennsylvania. Among other cases
local interest, there is a new trial granted II
the Observation-Disclosures breach OF promls'
case, ana Judgment is affirmed in the case
the Penn Bank VS. M. K McMullen, by whlci
his Inability to the bank is afhrmeo. Otnel
cases of local interest are as follows:
PER CURIAM:
Masters VS. Landers: C. P. No. l of Allegheny;
Judgment affirmed. 4, N ~ n -
ALLEGHENY: Judgment affirmed. 40,
Yard vs. Railroad Company; c. 7. No. l. Ane'
Rhenv; Judgment affirmed.
stu:z VS. the Coal and Coke Company; C. I. NO
OF Allegheny: judgment aftrmed 49,,
Thomas appeal c. Z. No. OF Alleghenyi oeere'
aiczsIs appeal, C. P. No. of Allegheny de,
Reeds eds appeaI; Orphans Court of Allegheny
decree affirmed. -, a.
McNeaI's vs. the Supreme COmmandeery, cry ETC.;
C z, No. / OF Allegheny; Judgment amTmed.
Gucky's appeal;. c. P No. l. oi AlIegheny'
BsIems appeal; c. c. of Allegheny; decree
BlacteIey's appeal; C. P. No. l. of Allegheny
eS5TS ooTcoran VS. Ches ct all c. P. No. of Allie
gheny; Judgment affirmed.
Magi1n VS.. the Dollar Savings Bank, C. P. No.
J. of Allegheny; Judgment afrmed. A.. -
Singers appeal c. $. Of Allegheny; the ORDER
Rogers appeal o. c. Of Allegheny decree af-
Rob6 VS.. Carnegie; error to Westmoreland
county; reargument ordered
NE Peonie,s savings Bank VS.. Denning eI al.
c. 2. No. Of Allegheny; Judgment reversed ana
Venire fscias de novo awarded. -.
ALLEGHENY: Judgment affirmed.
tlrfmesS appeal; o. C., of Allegheny; decree
Mc@uilin's appeal; C. P. NO2 of Allegheny;
s BeiI's appesI; c. P No. !, of Allegheny; decree
Carson ct al VS. Fuhs ct al; C. P No. z of AIle-
gheny; Judgment affirmed
[Iammopwealth VS. McNluEhton, @ s., of Allie
Eheny; Judgment reversed and venire faclas de
Holmes VS. Briggs and Dun. G. P. No. l, of Alle-
Eheny; JUDGMENT affirmed. nj,
Company, c. p. No. l. Of Allegheny; judgment
reversed and procedendO awarded.
Aiiegheny; Judgment reversed and prOcedendo
Xc6eson's appeal @. P, OrwAshingtOu county;
Wsrreii's sppeal and divers appeal, G. r, Of
Washington county; decree affirmed.
Borough of Williamsburg VS. Home for Aged
Protestant Women; c. Z. No. of Allegheny;
judgment affirmed:
Allegheny; udgment reversed.
Harsbach ys kurth; c. z. No. OF Allegheny;
judgment affirmed.
The Allegheny Valley Railroad Company VS.
Judgment reversed and new ven1re awarded.
Burgess and Town Council Of the Borough of
Millvale; c. 2. No. Of Allegheny; Judgment af-
firmed.
Berberfoh VS. Ebach & Heriebeckers; c. P. No.
Of Allegheny; Judgment reversed and venire
farTn 10 Wa
CHARTERS township ct al vs. LanEdon; c. P. No.
lod Allegheny; % ludgment reversed;
change Bank, of Pittsburg; Z. P. No. of Allie
gheny; Judgment affirmed.
BediIlion & Rose VS. the Howard Watch and
Clock Company: G. P. No. 2 of Allegheny; judy
ment reversed and yenire facias de iovo awarded.
pany same VS. Simpson, Hall, Miller & Co, same
vs. jackson, Hoppenheimer a Co.; c. 2. No: Of
Allegheny; Judgment in each case is reversed and
q new venlre awarded.
CLARK. j.:
Allegheny; judgment reversed and a proceed
gheny; Judgment affirmed. Dissenting opinion
by PaxsOn, 9. ].
WILLIAMS, j.
Mason VS. Mason. c. z. No. ], Of Allegheny; the
decree Diminishing the petition reversed and
decree Of divorce entered.
Duffy VS.. Nelson, G. z. No. !. of Allegheny; de-
cree reversed and bill dismissed at the cost Of the
Jones VS. Weithause, same VS. c. P. Weiterhaus-
en-, same vs Schlsg, same Shaler Township, c.
z. No. 2 OF Allegheny: judgment reversed.
Gumbert & Huey McCracken; @. P No. 2 of
Allegheny; judgment reversed.
MCCOLLUM, j.:
Dierstein VS. Schubksgel; G. P. No. of AIIe-
gheny; Judgment reversed and venire facias
de novo awarded.
MITCHELL, j.:
Knox appeal: o. c. Of Allegheny; Judgment
affirmed.
McNeaI VS. Pittsburg and Western Railroad Com
pany; e. p. Of Allegheny: judgment reversed and
Venire facias de nOvO awarded.
Reynolds vs. Cridge; c. P. No. of Allegheny;
judgment reversed and venire de novo awarded
Collins VS. CHARTERS Valley Gas Company; 9. P.
No. Of Allegheny; judgment reversed and venire
de ncvo awarded.