The Helena independent., 1890-03-22
THE DISTRICT COURT.
The Assignment of Cases Proceedings
Yesterday.


Yesterday.
Judge Hunt has made out the following
assignment Of cases for trial:
For March-27, No. 4, $50, Hirsch vs. Blood
No. 4,195. CITY w. Water Company: No
2s. 1886. Knight VS.. Richter; 29,No. 3,i9s
Coleman vs.. Aerrill.s
For April, State VS.. Ionick: .. No
3,972. Holter vs. Briscoe; 3, No i.492, Gil
christ VS.. Crawford; 4. No. 4,3i5. Fisher VS..
Briscoe; x, No. 4,596. Harris ys. Klein.
schmidt; ., No. 4,55l. Thibault vs. Nj. c. H.
Il. Co.: 10, State VS.. Patten; IL, Nos. 4,G9j-
1896, Helena LnmberC Co. VS.. Nj. c. X. X. Co.
II, No. 4,477, Harris VS.. Hotter umbel
Co.; II, No. 1876, Billings VS.. Hardy; lG
No. 4,is0, Stuissguth, ct al, VS.. Weinstein
IL. No. A.ls2, Buatz Vs. Ilangan; Is, No
4,j7S, Kosky VS.. McMasters; 10, No. 4,597,
Corners VS.. Hershfeld; 90. No. 1867, Sal
vail VS.. Parent; y, No. 4.0i2, Blake. ct AL,
VS.. MoCaffrey; n, No. i,l66, Duignan VS..
Davies; 10 No. 4,i14, Nank VS.. Milligan:
Nos. i,l22, i,l23, 4,l2i, 4,l25, Insurance
cases: 26, No. 4,640, Switzer VS.. Lannen; No.
4,903, Palmer VS.. Norris; -, No. 4,j93,
Lockey vs. Stahern; No. Ape. McNaughton
VS.. Cooper; 30. No. 1850. Jordan VS.. Shaw.
For May-l, No. 4,})5, Jensen VS.. Peter
son: No. 4,is6, Kennedy vs.. McCafirey; >,
No. i.iO0, Burns Vs. Warner; 3, 6, z, &, Clark
vs.. Auchard. 8. No. 4,ls5. Sullivan VS.. city,
10, No. 1896, Martin W.. Fuller; 13, No
1881, Salisbury VS.. Kennedy; IA, No. 3,S3s
Merritt w. Foote; No. 1904, Hundley VS.
Sykes; 10, Nos. 3,9i4, 3,9l5, 1916, 3,9iT
Dunton vs. Muth; l6, No. 1864. Landsman
VS.. Thompson; IL. No. 4,0b6. Weinstein vs..
Thompson; 20, No. 3,9)3, Owstein VS.. Black
foot Horse company; II, No. 4,2O9, S. Nj. Co.
VS.. Hutchings; 22. No. 4.2.O, Hershfield VS..
Porter; %, No. 4 300, LaReau VI. Robistaillei
"a, No. I,SA, Davenport ys. Reed; ~. No.
i,37l. Reed vs. Hefshiield; 2S No. I.3Sl-
1881, Schwab VS.. Owens; -, No. 4.435.
Walsh VS.. Schlesinger; 30. No. 4.43y Ban
croft VS.. Iieney; 81, No. 4,i37, Henneberry
VS.. Dorrity.
For June-3. No. 4,6l5. Jonas vs.. Lands
man; .. No. 1924 ,63O-i ,63l 4 ,G32, Parsons
VS.. Nj. Il. church, for q, Z. 10, H. u, -, IA, No.
i,tA3. Beach vs.. Floweree; IL, No. i.673.
Helena Lumber company VS.. Laughlin; Is.
No. A 4,G9S, French ys. Mcdonald.
There are no assignments thus far for the
remaining court days in June.
The following were the proceedings yes
terday in the district court:
2C05-Farrell. et nj VS.. Salisbury, stricken
from the docket with leave to reinstate.
&D7-kinney VS.. Mcguire same order.
39S3-Sigmund VS.. Gibbs, ct al, same or
der.
3930-Walsh VS.. Slzer, seven cases, de-
fault by defendant.
41b5-Walsh VS.. Fitzgibbons, four cases,
default by defendant.
4039-Meyer vs.. Hoskins ct al, stricken
from the docket.
42l3-Foote VS.. Sanford ct al same order.
i23G-Paynter VS.. Cross q Co., same or
der.
44i5-Down & Finch VS.. Lindauer ct al,
same order.
44J0-Weinstein & Co. VS.. Graham, same
order.
4573-Hoffman VS.. Lipe ct al, dismissed
by agreement.
106-Gilchrist Bros. a. Co. VS.. Helena Hot
Springs g. Smeter Railway Co.. default,
judgment for S2,2y9.Sl, with interest and
costs.
102-Kirkham VS.. same, default for $3.50. "a
interests and costs.
99-rhe journal Publishing Co. ys. Ken
ney, state auditor, demurrer 60 petition for
writ of mandate argued and taken under
adyisemeut.
John A. Ecklund was granted final nat
uralization papers.