The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1890-05-14

Of Commerce: .oompetltion never created E
9f sFS3 SSs L Gould The S
s Hpt T upon The estony sac the
bene0ciaries under q law Applause on
s 6 1 Bs s Sspeoh no b had prG 1d
function OF n tariff act, and would sooner re-
sign his seat than denart one hairs 6rsad 9th
from that belief. or course, he respected the
favored, and Peter turned down. Why 10;
crease the profits OF certain classesp He could
those oil all OF the aRricnlturists In any htate
side ~ He was not. he said. disturbed By the
applause on the other side. lie was exceed
sense that our counFymsS deserved proiec
tion.. IL when we had protected equally and
lifted up all our Industries. and the time should
then come when we could not hold our own.
being tho most intelligent the ireest, and
ablest people on enrth.then we had bettor re-
MIR BntterwoTth then proceeded e cxpound
his views touching recinroelty with Canada.
relations H With III fifty million peonio to the south
ward, and yet were afraid OF Canada Abra-
ham LINCOLN and Ulysses Grant were not aus;
pected of lack OF patriotism. yet they favored
There we're some things in the bill he did not
beer been able to make ss0.6ooo00 DIVIDENDS on a
capital OF sl,250o0o. Protection Why the
Soep these so% m in S the Filth AyenSe Hoo
their board and expenses. and set them Up in
the banking Ing S Ss their
grin; When he said that he az not favor that
kind Of re vas ,od dina %as are comet mot
when some little concern should be shown to
American homes and American firesides. A
foreign; In some great factories In the East
they were hnoEn on the rosters ,I 6y numbers
ala o Do bee1e Il was wise or to
make such q sweeping reduction In sugar to be
supplanted by bounty,
were very much mistaken If they thought that
the greatest desire OF his heart was not to nRss
i've yse WHAT saSsed 70
such features as he had pointed out In this bill
Ssh sh S pny s oU with
plate. That tax would amount to $4,000 1000
before the manufacturers Of tin plate could
party should not take false step. he did not
expect to participate much in the deliberations
TO 60 out, as his Democratic friends were anx
ious to get rid OF him when they Eerrymander-
cd him out. He was already out before they
MIR. Hatch OF Missouri. to whom an extension
OF time had been refused. said that the refusal
The other side knew that as much rs any living
man he represented the sentiment Of the agri-
cut him OH When they had weak billea had
cause-they sought to muzze debate. or this
pending amendment he said that 1t proposed
to prevent an increase OF duty on an article
used as fertilizer on every farm, an increase
made for the benefit OF two manufacturers and
hill sought to, draw a veil over the farmers
eyes by pretending that he was protected.
had proceeded upon the theory that the mu-
producing fertilizers, but the fact was that not
q pound was so used.
Mr.. McMlin's amendment, was rejected,
MIR. Niedrlnghaus of Missouri moved to
from five to three cents a pound. aud argued |
that a bora2 syndicate IN this country was pro-
Mr.. Morrow OF california Isl submitted tina. 1t
was protected in his own business, not BY pat
10 cut down the protection on another article.
Mr.. O'Ferrall OF Virginia read a list OF what
IN the duty on ready made clothing, which he
acid was in the interest Of Postmaster tieneral
Nanamaker. You tickle me and will tickle
lp campaisn funds That " was tt" the ex W
alton; he said. Of many Of these high duties
rom the debates in the British House Of Com
mons 10 show as he said, that they were SINH
ar In tone TO those made by Democratic Rep
Mr.. Niedringhaus's amendment was reject
'dhhyeas 81, nays NJ:
ect!on relating to coal-tar preparations. so rs
o reduce the duty from 20 to 10 per cen'. Lost.
relating to others. and asked for an
explanation OF the fact that in the case OF
llOSe tlutIb not lnnOTteQ the committee mad
made a reduction OF 20 per cent,
tut had increased the tax on those others that
we're imported
Mr.. Djngley Of Maine replied that as the gen
ieman had assisted In the preparation OF the
Hills bill. which contained exactly the same
language and figures perhaps he could ex-
'laiE himself
Mr.. Payne OF New York explained that the
eduction was made In the case of sulphuric
thor used for legitimate purposes and the in
rease made in the case OF those others used
IS food aduterants
MIR. McMillin made IN unsuccessful effort to
educe he duty on gelatne. glue, and ISM
lass. which WAS followed by an equally futile
hort on the part OF 1Ir; McAtoo Of New Jer-
Mr.. Biggs OF California offered an amend
1ent increasing the duty on olive oil from IS
? 30 cents gallon. He advocated the prolec.
lon of the olive oil industry in the interest OF
ure olive oil: He was a good Democrat, hut
o was not hide bound His party was opposed
, his amendment, hut he. as an independent
merican citizen. advocated tho proposition.
The amenIment was rejected.
Various other amendments were offered but
,ere rejected: and atcr considering thirteen |
the l56 pages OF the bill the committee rose.
II