The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1890-05-25
ESUPERIOR COURT.
1ge Lichtenberg Attended
the Ball Game.
s,sER JUDGES WERE NOT susy.
Il 1v11et Agsinst - Detrsss-suss Assinss
) 1s1ssrsSh cempsny-Nsw cases
--BIssfer-Tsisi Cnisnaar.

Yuy Iiftie Was done in three deparf-
rnts Of The superior court yesterday aside
IN the hearing Of the usual Saturday
oltons.
n only case that came up for trial In
& = superior court Of King county ytster-
~ rs the case Of u. G. Quinn W. James
ood. in which Judge Hnmes found
~fenent for the plaintiff for S. This case
80 up on appeal Of the defendant from
= sefdict Of : jury in Justice MiIier's
\ m u favor Of the plaintiff for $50.
5kxu IicbtenbcTg disposed Of the business
~ ~ department. In time TO witness the
IN eame, and drove out 70 the park In his
Stoetcn. Judge Strat:on disposed Of some
- over fifty motions and entered two
f11rments by default. One OF them was
njnst r. Miliniski for $1i6.67 Tor ths Best
Market The other vas obtsined BY
/ IN Bsraus against ]. Hyman for =, pf.
s - ! balance due on account
sxxpIcr AGAINST THE pETRoIr.
III The morning Judge Humes' jury
h1nGht in sealed verdict for the plaintiff
= 073 IN the case OF Duncan Mckenzie
VI Naioney Bros, owners Of the steamer
LIZZIE ixEFE BEDROOM sETs.
IL motion for setting aside the verdict
- ! new trial, In the case Of the Standard
Iumisure Company ". Lizzie and Joseph
IN, Ne case from Morning Star alley.
ekoesin the plaintiff brings suit for the ~
oopusy cf 81 200 for beds and bedroom sus-
nI1use. wss argued before Judge Humcs In
- ntteTnoon. The motion was oyerruied
80 Joseph Ixen, aad as to Lizzie Ix.n.
~ question was taken for further consid-
ootion.
TWO INSANITY CASES.
]. n Clark, the troublesome lunaaic Who
- toon In the county jail for the past few
1eyp, induIging the hailucination that be
= Jotn The BAPTIST. Vas sdjudeed insane
ts5o5o Probate Judge Osborn, and coai-
xIt1nont issued. upon which he was taken
49, osylum at stei!acoom by Jack Nc
Duneld and James Wells yesterday after
Nh Katherine Arnold was taken before
1G11s Osborn on comp Amt Of insanity
euosn out BY G. !. Graded, and adjndged
fnnne and decree Of commitment. en-
tsod. Mrs. Arnold Is from North seattle,
~ her mania has man7lestcd suicidal
1nndency. It has been growing upoe her
oince the loss OF child some time since.
& hss required the censtans care Of her
1osband to prevent her from executing her
olieidAl purpose.
MISSED THE DEAL.
3. b Hicks. In complaint filed ysstes-
Is, alleges that he has suffered damages
= ths amount Of $i.225 by the American
District Telegraph Company. and he sues
01s corporation for the recovery OF this
snognl The circumstances OF the cess as
~ forth In the complaint ere q follow:
The plaintiff, on April 10 last, through .
duly authorized agent. purchased six lots
IN DraytCn, Whatcom county. The agent
agreed to pay Il. COO for the lots as soon e
b could send letter 70 the plaintiff and
receive hts answer by telegram.
The agent Immediately sent special Dc.
livery letter to Hicks, which, upon It's ~
rival In Seattle, Was placed In the hands of
IN 4. b. T. messenger for delivery. The
letter Was never received by Hicks and the
sale fell through. The lots afterward sold
for an advance Of q. 100 The plaintiff sues
for this amount and for Sis additional for
the expense Of employing the agent.
EJEcTNESr Sur.
r. X. Spencer. Trustee. filsd an ejectmsnt
suit against U. r. Niess. J. s. Lorraine. II.
b. Blewett and two or three Does. for the
recovery Of possession OF eight acres Of land
h section IA. township - north. range 3
sest and also for $3.50 damages against
seeA q defendants for holding unlawful
voueeeuion Of the premises for the past nine
meotha
SUING FOR BALANCE.
4. /. Day fled . suit against A. G. MIL
Ter Tor the collection OF q balance on &C
count OF sos.
ASurHER ATTORNEY.
On motion OF w. II. Moore. Frank II.
Knapp, holding certificate from the su-
preme court of Hi ois, was admitted TO
The bar by Judge Strat.on.