Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1890-05-21

concentrated melala, testing 10y
pOlariscOpe not above seventy de-
grees, shall Jay a duty Of 81 cents
Per pound and for every additional
degree or fraction Of degree, three
hundredth Of . cent per pound adj
ditiOnal; all sugar above No. Is, and
not above No. 10 ID. =. 10 cents
per pound; all sugars above No. lG.
and not above No. %, ID. =, I.gg.
cents per pouui;all sugars above No.
-, ID. =, PIG cents per pound:
nolasses testing not above IS de-
grees hy poiariscope, = cents per
gallon; mOlasses testing above s.
degrees, ! cents per gallon.
N'KINNA SAID
this amendment made reduction
on the existing duty on sugar of
ABOUT IS Per cent. II retained the
dlViding line at Is, instead Of Is,
anu secured to the Tefiners Of this
country the refining Of sugar be-
| tween IL and Is, which the pending
bill impracticably sent to foreign
reiiners. As contrasted with the
Mills bill, Il was not case Of low
ering or increasing the-rate, but OF
= change Of policy. The pending
| nih IN all particulars except the
sugar schedule was brave and strong
! because it was brave. In the sugar
| chcdulc &c was timil and ;in,e-
| serving. In the ether schedules the
ill carried cut republican princi-
| pies. II nigh: be well for the re-
| publiCans 10 pause and consider
| - nat they were doing rs 20 It's prac-
| teal ami political effect, ifu8: 81 its !
nominal effect Tine Chicago plat
| form enumerated the ways and /
| means Of reducing the revenue and !
declared that the revenue system
should be destroyed. rather than
any part OF the protective system be !
surrendered. The sugar industry 1
was the part Of the protective system !
surrendered 10y this bin. The sugar !
schedule pointed rs directly n ever
a free trader pointed 90 the b'urHt
% buying in the cheapest market. |
Democratic &pplause.l Wool was
not produced 10 the extent Of uur 1
wants and 10 one could predict l
when it would be. Democratic |
applause Itwas To-Day a declining /
Industry democratic 8pp!auSe' anu /,
had been given Increased E.u-cctiJu /
in this hili hg.s;sc &c was
\ DECLINING INDUSTRY,
and yet it was cllIel the keystone |
Of the arch Of protection. II the |
committee are right on the position 4
taken 10y IL in it. report the duty on I
wool was charge on the consumer.
Democratic applause! The Ieuub-
icIu party could u5s make sugar
-he s. lpugsEt q! the surplus without
involving the protection system L.
self.
The bill male sugar a carsrnbsni !
in the protective Syz.en. II the
bounty system was correct. why no.
apply il tc c:hgr thing. Why 10.
apply r. 70 IN plate laughter, and
save al once, il the committee were
right The was only repeating It's
reasons, not endorsing tEemL 4
5000, Utl in revenue aud taXali1ue
Why not apply It 90 linen goods
which we liI uu. produce. sui Vi-e
the people ci's~p linen % 20 with /
cheap tn and sugar? Laughter.
Why not apply II 10 wool uu.ii that
article was produced in the country /
q the extent Ct tie peoples wants.
Democratic laughter Think of
the splendid p3iit.-sl effect upon ihg
r-pi'a.'gan party when Il sy-s EN-
aided TO point with pride 90 the
workiugm3n and farmer sitting
down to cheap breakfast ina che-p |
salt Of clothes. tLauEhtur.'
Cannon lli.A opposed tine amend
inert. what was the position 0i I
tie republican PARTY touching the
protective system To relieve from I
dg'y those articles OF foreign pro-
iu"tion, except luEurie-, the like o.
which could not De produced ~
home. Less sugar was produced IN
this country ugw thau thirty years
aE0. The gentleman from Call !
foruil was not correct when he said
wool stood oa sii f1urs with sugar.
The production Of wool last year
under the present insult Client tar
i'll was 81, c'3 ,H51 pounds. aud the
imports were Sl-J,DJy, 900 pounds.
Twice as muCh was