Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1890-11-19
SUPREME COURT.
IN BANK.

TUESDAY, November 18th
Court met at 10 A. NJ. Present-Beetty, c. j.,
presiding; Sharpstein j.: Thornton, J. McFar-
land, j.; Spencer, CLERK; Washburn. Baiif.
Elk parte II. J. Palmer, Oh haDeas corpus Ap-
plication of Hart for writ OF habeas corpus sub
nitted.
l3424-Wren VS. Mangin ct al On motion of
Jacobs. ordered submitted upon briefs op file.
Is 693-Fulton VS.. Brsnnan ct al. On motion
of Bates, ordered respondent have twenty days
to file brief, appellant ten days TO reply, cause
to be thereupon submitted.
13,664-Ross VS.. Kennedy ct al. Pursuant to
stipulation, ordered appellant have twenty days
to file brief, respondent twenty days to reply,
appellant five days TO reply thereto ceuse TO
be thereupon submitted
1906 Nutall VS.. Lovejoy ct al On motion of
Bradley. ordered appellant Lovejoy have thirty
days to file brief, respondent thirty dsys 10 re-
ply, appellant ten days TO reply thereto, cause
to be thereupon submitted
l3,7e5-Buchanan VS.. Nagle ct al. On motion
of Bates, ordered appellant have fifteen days TO
file brief, respondent fifteen days TO reply, ap-
pellant ten days to reply thereto, cause 10 be
thereupon submitted.
13.72i-Dewar VS.. Ruiz b. consent, ordered
appellant have thirty days to file brief, re-
spOudent-th days to reply, appellant ten
days to reply thereto, cause to be thereupon sub
mitted
I3.723-Eltzroth vs.. Ryan ct al. On motion of
Whitmore, ordered responder have thirty days
to file brief, appellant ten days to reply, cause
to c thereupon submitted.
13.739-Diss VS. Hinckley ct al. On motion OF
Hoefier, ordered appellant have fifteen days to
file brief respondent fifteen days to reply. ap-
pellant ten days to reply thereto, cause &c be
thereupon submitted.
13. 753-Belcher vs. Farren ct al On motion
of Hoeher, ordered appellant have fifteen days
to file ief respondent fifteen days to reply,
cause to be thereupOn submitted.
13. T53-Harney VS.. Farren ct al. On motion
OF Hoefer. ordered app ellant have hiteed days
to file brief respondent fifteen days to reply. APP
pellant fifteen days to reply thereto, cause to be
thereupon submitted
13,.67--Hyda VS.. Mangan. On motion Of Ja-
cobs, ordered submitted upon briefs on file.
13,s06-Wright VS.. Cohn ct al. On motion OF
Abbott, ordered appellant have twenty days TO
file brief cause TO be thereupon submitted.
Il. 555-Redd VS. Murray. Pursuant to stipula-
ton, continued for the term.
13,S25-Stevens VS.. Lovejoy ct al. On motion
of Bradley, ordered appellant have thirty days
to file brief respondent fifteen days to reply, sp-
pei ant ten DAY to reply thereto, cause to be
thereupon submitted
Is $50 McDoUald VS.. Taylor ct al. On mo-
ton of Bates, dered respondent have thirty
days to file brief, appellant ten days to reply,
cause to be thereupOn submitted.
l3,S65-HayS ct al VS.. Fine ct al. Pursuant to
stipulation, ordered appellant have thirty, days
to tile brief, respondent thirty days to reply, ap
pellaut ten days to reply thereto cause to be
thereupon submitted.
lS.S79-a.ller ct al. vs. Byrd Pursuant to
stipulation, ordered appellant have forty days
to file brief, respondent and intervenor twenty
days to reply, appellant twenty days to reply
thereto. cause to be theTeupOn submitted.
L, 954-McFadden VS.. Tenant. On motion OF
Hoefer, ordered continued for the term.
l4,05S-Estate of Danielson. On motion of ia
cobs. ordered appellant have thirty days to file
bret cause to be therelp pom submitted.
14,0s3-Harlan ct al. VS.. Stuiilebeem. Pursu-
ant TO stipulation, ordered submitted upon
briefs on file.
1t06S-Cohn ct al VS.. Wright ct al. Pursuant
to stipulation, ordered respondent have thirty
days TO file brief, appellant twenty days to re-
ply, cause to be thereupon submitted.
l4070-Woody ct al VS.. Bennett ct al. BY con-
sent. ordered submitted npon briefs on file.
Adjourned until to- oTrow at 10 A. N.
Ex parte Palmer on habeas corpus. Ordered
that writ of habeas corpus issue as prayed,
returnable before the Court in bank, at the
| Courtroom in san Francisco, on Monday, De
| cember s. 1890. at 10 O'Clock A. NJ. Ordered
further. that immediate notice OF this order and
copy of the petition be served on the District
| Attorney of Sacramento. Ordered further that
| the petitioner be admitted to bail, pending the
| hearing of said writ, in the sum of $500 sure
! ties to be approved by the Superior Judge Of
| Sacramento county. THE COURT.
lS.S75-Estate Of WEIGH. Reheaung denied
| November II, 1890. HE COURT
iS.s40-Noyesv S P Co. ReheariDg granted
| Novemberl7, 1880. THE CURT.
| Ex parte Robin Vance and Stewart Vance, on
| habeas corpus. Let writ issue herein, return
| able before the Hon. J. p Presley, Judge of the
| Superior Court of Souoma county. on the 2ls
| day of November, 1899, at 1880 A. II.
| T. B. MCFARLAND.
Justice of the Supreme Court.