The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1890-09-03
||IyE IN THE COURTS.
MD Restrained from Selling
Goods.
D.)sLEs or A SHOE DEALER


- I1c1f4nDerS was kept pusy yeStexo4Y
-1Se appIications for injunctions.
- Maxwell obtained a temporary injuuc-
sssiust william Johnson. restraining him
"A fesxing down fences and opening the
- rosd through the premises of the
THE SHERIFF REsTRAIHED.
! ! fxnn and J. B. Stetson obtained q tenn
~ restraining order restraining the sale OF
a ~ Of goods Of c. II. Brown & Co., 1877
~ street, By Sheriff J. II. McGraw, upon q
~ mosIe age held by W. r Ballard
- r,nplaint alleges that the D ainriffs held
lISs srsanss c. H. Brown & Co aggregafing
~ III mich they levied upon the goods
- a chastel MGR gage was executed
~ nWc Fl. brown & Co., IN favor of w. r.
iisrd. ofiginaI for the sum of $500. but was
1rvrdsraised to 5000 but was not acknowl-
E,1rd s nised. It is alleged that the mortgage
- siysn 70 hinder and DELAY creditors.
SHOE DEALERS TROUBLES
- Yrane. tue shoe dealer on Third street
80 August q executed q bill of sale Of his
- Il goods 10 Paul Rehfsch. of Fan fran-
- 10 b sold for the benefit of San Francisco
rdtorx, wss In court yesterday with an sppli-
90 10 have the bill of sale set aside and for
runinisg order pencing the hearing of an APP
rnfion for a temporary injunction restrain
rnsint alleges that the goods are worth
ard the building $500. AID that this sn-
~ the entire means of the plaintiff. for pay
q BE ersdi:ors. whose claims aggregate $500
Efnclaimed that the defendant Is boxing M
= eoods for shipment. 10 defraud the other
6difor& The defendants attorneys. Peterson
1pkrnesatber. Immediately fed their answer
\ he complaint, she temporary restraining
- uas passed, and the court proceeded with
<f1saring OF the application for temporary
section. The answer denied that the goods
~ worth owe 5000 OF the building over $685.
j - court ordered that .he defendant give
lnds In the sum of sl00 600 for the faithful dis
nfIon OF the goods for the benefit all cred
/ n aud that the goods remain in Seattle in .he
nfsdy 81 the sheriff.
BEFORE JUDGE srRATroS.
~ case of I'll l. Outline 4 Co. VS. the Seattle
NJ Dock aud Ship-Building Company was on
|fsl before Judge rAtton's jury. This case is q
|nIticr Sis Is per bill rendered for q prepara-
I'm for treating piles. coming up on appeal
BON judgment for the plaintiff from Justice
Rivers court The defendant claims that the
PREPARATION did not prevent the teredo's raw
|geA The case viii so to the jury this morning.
CRIMINAL MATTERS.
Tr,uk Smith. who pleaded not guilty of burg
Gunes and withdrew his former plea, and
>lfsded guilty.
Emery Glenco and Harry Hall. the pair OF bad
bcyr Who have msnia for stealing brass junk,
sefe tried for grand lsrceny before Judge Humes
]nfy, and Q sealed verdict returned. The boys
pefe bound o-er By Justice Miller for stealing a
sumber Of brass steam fittings from z. G. Miles
: Co. last June.
THE HEARING OF COOKS PETITION.
The hearing of the application of Charles A.
Cook for the guardianship OF John Moore, the
lnsane owner OF The Des Moines townsite, was
began before Probate Judge Richard Osborn.
Judge Gslusha Parsons, for the Des
Homes Land and Improvement Company, ap-
esred In opposition TO Mr.. Cooks
appointment and L Z. Thompson
lppesrsd In behalf Of the petitioner. MT.
Cook vent upon the witness stand. He waa
Ihefply cross-examined for an hour or more by
Iudse Parsons. Dr. Redp tn. of the steilacoom
1sans asylum, was ais" present aud testified
~ Moore was still confined az the asylum and
lepssessiy insane. He also testified that the
Rnltees OF the asylum had investigated Moors's
akfest in the Des Mosnes tract, and had pro-
uFsd an abstract The hearing will be con-
IaDed this morning.
THE DAYS FILINGS.
q Brodek and John Schlesinger died a suit
kshe foreclosure OF q mechsnic's lien for 81
Wsgainst John Ssnderson. The complaint al
fgss that the parties to the suit entered into an
gsenept to build adjoining buildings, the ex-
}sase OF the party wall TO be shared alike. The
Alendant, it Is alleged. mas failed TO pay his
pnportion.
The case Of G. Winehili VS.. the Pacific Coast
hsmsnip Company. q suit for sos for goods lost
J transit, was filed in the superior court upon
zeal Of the defendant from q ia igment Of
naice Rivers In tavo- of the plaintiff
Thomas Gesland vs. Snoqualmie Mill Comps-
g-suit for sZ0a62.
Sarah Z. Bennett vs. II. NJ. Be nnett--Suit for
tiyoree ON grounds of drum kenness.
faul FIR Q imaa W. w. +. McNault ct a1--Suit
n j6s5 for goods.
Charles Z. Zane vs. Kelleher & Co.-Attach-
nent suit for $40