The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1890-07-26

|
least until something was heard from the
other side Of lie chau Dor and now the sena-
of Of his nature laughter, inquired from bis own
committee for some, Information on the btll.
Bid NOT that honorable senator know that for for
been fun Of lrr.r,s that 1t had been resolN ed,
rot only by tho Finance committee but by tho
defence ul tho pending hil: Had not that
senator noticed that when n Senator on the
democratic side OF the chamber addressed tho
Senate tho seats on the !icpnhli.Hn sidc
Immediately became va, ant, showing mat
konub'iGal Senators did no wish to henr any
le defended 1t could not hn passed. he tnGrfei
lore, N otuer u ,eNpedlie, business, YOU, Wo}H,a
move thot thn nendiIE M bn 10
70 report at the enrlics, Iractcahio m9meidt a
hlll to lennce me teiSnue anu ,oc ayera"o
t o, on mp Hp DS x as.s Ee AVERAGE nd
N4lorem wnr tarllt rnlo o. iS1i. ,i-,hoo,
! Mr. Aurlch,-Af you IN IaNor Vi EoihE o"'h
to he Lates OF 1864 =, ,,o,ro hool.
NJ @ am IN lyo n 5 %, TE id IVA VA
ioysm ie,es Of is6i; A.,,,,..~,.,. 10
NJ AiurichuS,aiWe inc particular fH'os' ~
MtteT mere snSclIc; .,,o. of tho average nd
Valorom rates. 49,, ,.o,o,, 49,. 4, - ,o
Mr.. Alrlherson THEN !aunGneu on, 10 ~, u To- %
We Wow oil Inc ,nfi IMG r IN Ia nndert"o tx
to show TINT neither the farmer nor me con, CON
would ho benefited: Mas It inb1r' pI II Tns
can party rocIaimed itself the friend oi ia trn
trade PARTY. NJ greater ialsehoou hau i,s ever 81
been uttered he referred TO tne "n M one %,
had been corruptly raised ana cnrrnpuy n nS,i
In behalf OF the Rernbiiran ucket. in ma.
money had been raised no sniu, among tne
them being pi9us cnIzen on nt LII, wv,
VINO haa since peen rowaToeH VIII la;S seat 4,
paCSos, in the Of sSs
nuoc voice nd n no cnE ~. nisracsd
Mr. George Dem; Miss. The Senator hos
| referred to starving laborers at tho North be-
ing ,ed 70 me Dolls; want 10 asK Wnetne IN W
protected mines exist, It ia fact that there IRE
| laborers unemployed or VINO are not PAID lull
| MIR. McPherson-l claim that the projection
given by the Republican party under The plea
| OF projection to American labor, labor never
gets The manufacturer gets II.
Mr.. GeorRe-ls that the TACT
cry article on the tariff list which bears an ay-
| erage ad yalorem rate OF 81 per cent. ana d.
vide 1t by 2, and the result Will show tho labor
| cost OF the, article. Ihen tnKe tho COST o.
American iapor as Twice as large az that OF
o anu II h per abor cos in tbo
sent tG ~ tSat orticIa 50 That The rasn,t IL
that OUT OF tat rae o, n q I'd er @ Cant 70 "a
por cent. goes 10 LABOR ana o''' per cent 10
NJ GeorFemD9es the Senator mean to De, be
arify 10 }0r tba beramt Of Smerican labor ia
mere sham ana fraud R r ,o .,n,~,o n,,,,tuo
MIR. Mcpherfonni viii give simple iiius aao
n thi ia Xii hears mn nvaraGe rate Of about
81 ner sent ana the a labor cost oil the products
uoVs n9I in al pe NJ eoroe vbetber be
c6nsiderou NJ mernefson GG9u au1horI'y on
Inc eieGI o. pr aood nntbo ot hoT as
rot great while since the Senator from N ,sS
S Ses1G was 'uo'eu 0n 'n' o'ne' e'ue u 'n'
aNMi III. Tepberson-I will answer the question
OF INC oe1at99i Ei h!t t LAM oIi ny onn
account T9d % iGrpl nd M me Am err ma
wages as the panper labor OF any country. l
s ean LABOR HSs 10 give Hfp'0 pf0''''ion u Ai0f
Mr: sherman oriticiSea mr.; mcthersons re-
the pendins Bill to the average rate existing IN
1904, anu e4DlaineGe tnae inc a'erhEe vi ;'..oo
9nuer tne aT Ui iSpi WIS Mus M t Ing
aoods @ 1 tha ~ Ut nr out can tn
Imported goods vas on the free list Under
the pehdinG oiti on per cehI; o. intGrteu GOODS
rate Of duty were ascertaned On the goods
r eee % an Az ner cent bnt univ n neI
Mr.. Mcpherson said that he would be bold
man who would deny that the pending bill was
and Without the slightest particle Of interest to
anybody else While that was not 9. pleasant
quality OF reck less courage, II that was the
Imagined they were to receive. then SO let it be-
Mr.. Butler Dem. s. c. asked Mr.. sherman
what proportion OF the ,dut able articles now
proposed TO be put on the free list was pro-
duced in this country.
MIR. sherman was not prepared to answer.
but he gave the amount as $l0S.920.OO0. calcu-
lated on the importations OF last year. and
gave the amount now on tho free list as about
1856. 100000. making the whole amount OF i'm
ported goods that would be on the Tree list
about $365.OU0.O0O. SO that 1865 0OOOOO OF I'M
ported goods would be free OF duty and $500
100000 subject to duty He thought that MIR.
Mcpherson ought to state tho matter squarely
to the good people Of New Jersey. who were
clamoring more loudly for higher protective
duties than the people OF any other State, and.
Il he did 80. he would inform them that under
the pending bill, the average rate OF duty, on
all imported goods, dutiable and undutlabe.
was only 81 or % per cent.
Mr.. ALLISON REP. Iowa. inquired. sarcasti-
cally how Mr.. MCPHERSON would like his reso-
The first schedule was chemicals. and the
average duty on them was 371s per cent. 80
that the reduction there under HIS resolution
would be ony ~ per cent. The next schedule
was earthenware and glassware. and the aver
age rate OF duty was 5O56 per cent. Was the
Senator from New Jersey willing TO have that
rate reduced to So per cent, ad valorem2
Mr.. MCPHERSON said that he knew exactly the
reason for the inquiry. and would be glad 10
answer It He would be willing to have the rate
OF duty on earthenware and glassware reduced