Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1890-10-18
CLOSING EVIDENCE
'ne Dyer Examination yearir. an
End.

objection havingb bee, nal. -,
10 evidence hal been taken sbaw ,,
ing that expenditures made Nv M nv,
TT =, ID Dyer as receiver for elerl
hdre and Office rent n.J - ,
SHe'ei, and as it was ,,oen,e me-
ieno ,aoie to include such evi.
Ience In the record, commits.
1ioneF Stones court held a seeeIan
Al l a. m. today 10 take tes,imo-y
On those points.
Mr.. Dyer testified;
had Mr.. NIoRat Is nv .,.r,
during my receivership. and mil
MN 500 per month; could mot Lare
obtained n competent clerk f,r Iess.
ii''l an Office in the Wasqtcb l.uiIJ.
ing for while at SIS per month:
afterwards, when rents were F,is,.-j
paid $40; later I furnished an
Once IN my own Lauding ana
charged the same f,rit Tint / had
paid before; later still [ toni, an
Office ia the gas company's building
for which l paid So per month. /
consider the amounts l paiI for
clerk hire and Office rent reason.
able.
by order Of the court p. L
Williams was pail SjjJJ for
his services as my attorney
the frst year; since then l
have paid him on account Sl5la
After employing Mr.. Williams I
spoke 10 Arthur Brown. and desir..,j
MN - act as receivers attorney
also, ''eS
.. Nir. Narian here stated t1at nj.
me VI examination was not material
70 me hndiug he had asked h M,
nitig; lac did not intend 10 pttacl.
Mr. Williams cs-y ices. hut u,.rr.IT
=. {, nave II shown in the findings that
i2'J was paid 10 him without au-
thoEity from the court.
NiE. Dyer was cuUss-examirpI bv
mr. Narian concerning the services
ui his clerk, aul testified that tb.t
clerk uid work for him not connected
win thc rycviveI-hip, hut tfallt,
matter was properly adjusted IN
HeHginS The accounts. had two oil
60, one for the receiver-hipani ON,
Tor my own private business. I
rented an Office from myself two oT
three months.
To the cOmmissioEer-AfterI had
actually obtained possession Of The
property Of the Church. there We
a great deal cC work 10 be done i'm
taxing care Of il; / spent q great
seal of time in so doing: / think / |
pugh. - have 500 per month for
my services since l was paid my
iirst years sliaTy; / might have
Sept my own books; | think I ought
% be paid in proportion 10 the MAJ
uitude 81 the trust, the bond | bgu
.2 give, and the responsibility I as
sumet.
The commissioner Inquired NJ
length and Ia detail about lie
services Of the clerk, their nature.
necessity, etc. Returning 10 th,.
subject OF Mr.. Dyer's compensation.
the latter sJ!l he would not for q
Do nl"nt consider $500 ger month
like Cumppusatiou for hi-
services a. receiver. had lac been To-
lIiIet 70 a'r,ulpu everything else:
lee maze three OF four times thai
much In his business.
The commissioner also injured
with great Particularly about the
items for OiliCe rent. and the witucs-
'.-tcG in sal stance that they were
necessary expenditures.
To Mr.. NaTian the witness testi
.ie,. that all the expenses incurred /
'y him, except those connected with
he sheep and the cost Of previous
whigi were con-
lugnt UguH orders made Iy the
'surt, were reasonable and neces
AIRY.
II. W. Lawrence, the present rr-
'rirer, testiiied-I employ a clerk al
400 per month; think this sll4ry |
'sas9nanle Tor such a man as i !
-egeszaEy.
To Mr.. Nariln tine witness tc,ii-
ig'. as O. the ugtU-e9f hi- duties and
work as receiver, the time IL re-
.g!rgi, etr.
To Judge judd gave a bond OF |
l'N11. aud have in my possession {
rom -Tu..lt 20 S~iJ.UHH worth
q property; / don't think a man /
shs = worth no mg-r than clerks /
wages could furnish such q bond. 0T |
.rIpeEly carry sIch a responsibility. |
IE- court adjourned with tie
understanding that the commission
Y would ass uloH the finding pre- |
sriel iy the parties respectively, |
u! pre-! are his report ~ au ,--ly |
ay.