St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1890-02-25
ORGANIZED La wLEssNEss.
Bloody BaIfour's TyrannicaI Meth
DDS Denounced in Parliament.


LONDON. Feb. 2I-In the house of
commons Mr.. Morley gave notice that
lie would move as an amendment to w.
IL. Smiths motion, thatthe house adopt
the Farnell report, that the house rep
rebates the charges of the grayest
and most obvious falSehood, based upon
caiumny, that have been made against
members of the house, and, whilst
expressing its satisfaction at the expos
Ure made of the evil doors, regrets the
wrong inflicted and the suffering and
loss endured through those acts of fla
grant iniquity. Sir Charles Edward
Lewis, member for Antrim, gave notice
that he would move that the house de-
plOres that Messrs. Dillon and O'Brien
and seven other members have. by an
official commission, been declared
parties 10 a reasonable conspiracy;
that Mr.. Parnell and many others
have been declared parties to a GRIM
inal conspiracy; and that the house
finds the conduct of such members de-
serving OF severe condemnation. Mr..
Sexton moved to adjourn. His purpose
was to cali the attention of the house to
the illegal violence used by the Irish
executive during the Clangory eYic-
lions. In the dead OF hight body of
emergency men, assisted by body of
armed police.
BURNED THE HOUSES
over the heads of the tenants and the
evicted. making many families home
less: while charitable neighbors, who
endcavored to provide shelter for the
victims, were roughly assaulted, the
police marching TO the farm where huts
were in course of erection and arrest
ing the wOrkmen, in gross viola
ton Of law. Another laWIess out
rage of the police was their
breaking into tenants houses and
arresting seven of the workmen. Could
the police break into houses for the pur-
pose of making arrests except upon a
charge of TelOny? What was the charge
against those workmen? Father Kin
sella, who had tried to protect them,
lad been sent to prison by complacent
magistrate for opposing the illegal
command OF a police officer. All of
which proved once again that Ireland
was not governed by law, but was
ruled by a horde of INSCRIPTIONS
instruments of practically absolute
minister. Mr.. Balfour denied that the
police had destroyed the property of
tenants. Mr.. Sexton. he said, ap-
peared TO think that evicted persons
should be allowed to violate the law
with impunity. Poverty might excuse
lied and wholesale laWlessnesS. The
men eyicted at Clangory were, how
ever, rich enough to subscribe to the
plan of campaign. They were rich
enough to offer the land agent certain
payment on condition that their frienuS
Were let out of prison. Certainly land
lords should be SDaring in the use of
violent methods of eviction. yet il it
was once admitted that the law might
be detied whenever resistance was
backed by a powerful conspiracy, a
most injurious blow would be struck at
the ORDER and prosperity of Ireland.
lCheers.I Sir Charles Russell maintained
that the government procedure ia Ire
land constituted system that
COULD NOT long STAND
beside that Of country governed ac-
cording to constitutional principles.
Hear. hear.l The proceedings at Clan
CORY presented an instance which the
police measures were purely arbitrary,
without either legal sanction or moral
Justification. The despotIsm of Mr..
Balfour directly endangered the peace
of the country. The t5ase should
as another Instance of how
Mr.. Balfour always stood by the
police in enforcing the law. however.
brutal their conduct, or however great
the interference With the rights and lib
erty of individuals. rCheers.l The
house voted against the motion to ad-
1Ourn by 1876 to 154. r. G. Graham
moved to amend the address by decla-
ration in favor of shortening the hours
OF labor, and that an instruction in bar
mony with the amendment be
given TO the delegates ap-
pointed to attend either the
Berlin or the Berne conference. Mr..
Bradlaugh opposed the amendment as
injurious to trade and the best interests
Of the country. Reyolutionsts might
favor such measure. He was for re-
form. but not for revolution. Right
Hon. Sir j. Ferguson, under secretary
for foreign affairs, announced that it
would be premature to give the replies
10 GermapY'S or Switzerland'S invita-
tionS to conferences, aud that
the latter was at present abandoned.
Lord Randolph Churchill was surprised
at Sir James FERGUSON, and saw no
reason for any secrecy. lie favored the
discussion of the subject. but regarded
the amendment as inopportune. He
strongly criticised Mr.. Bradlaugh's at
Gitude, and thought that but few Radi-
Gals would indorSe it. He advised that
parliament should give sympathetic
but not dogEIatic reception to the de-
mandS of the labor party. The amend
ment was rejected by 1875 to 81, and the