The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1890-05-20
] SUPERIOR COURT
nyman Defending = 81, 900
Damage Suit.
& MONTHS FOR ASSAULT.


19GW HNsNh - 80. 1sA0et(Ee
11paes euis Of ,. Konter5eus u John L
- ras tried yesterday before Judge
q fury In the superior court The jur-
IN the case sisortIy before O'Clock,
= nesed verdict viii be returned THIS morn
SSI1<e iafy sgress The piaintsass claim u
~ ~11t damages against the defendant. .
: ss11sSna. Who. it - alleged, BY eAseless man
51r1 81 his team ran over the platsfi6 On
- sSr6eoech 10 the City dock ia 1857. breaking
~ lS2k bore. Tho defense sought 70 csfab-
- - me responabiIity Cor the injuries be-
! S1lt the plaintiff. Testimony Vas intro
3 5SS = show that he did not ye. oss Of the
go - nuf bis hand on the horses daak as he
1lt ciusing tho animal TO jump aid bring
& S ~ vehicle against him. masaing his lsrab
d 4 wheel xnf . lamp post.
esAI ESTATE rfaa SUED.
z = j Roberts and Hannah Kisteumaeher
u - - : complaint against the real estate
q tbbo.t 4 Gr.nishs for tie recovery ~
Z - ~ complaint alleges hat the Plaintiffs
55ikS "a n .ast ApsI were induced by the de-
n11a a takc 6ne-fsftb interest ia a syndi-
- =. ne purchase OF tract Of 100 acres Of
tua John Erum. in township % north.
z'sSs6 eate. King county. TIC otaer members
= - eradieasc. each holding 9Th intersst.
- ~ Two dcfendauis. AinHa = TRAN ana u.
i 1tSxtrx. Tho plaintiffs SET forth that the DE-
t1nnls represented 70 sEem fhat their proper
s511S 4 he purchase price was $40, which they
Ssu 1bey allegc thai the purchase price of
~ f,eet mas only u. SO aud that the defend
- rneciyea 800 commission for making the
SS1a ne plansiGs claim. therefore, tnst their
- Sxouoffion Of the purchase price Was only
~ "a shey charge the defendants With ton-
. s1nG11a o their own Esc OF the remaining $50.
lk1dy uIs & Tor the recovery Of this aad SIC
lotx
II kxpEzzI,*s aDafsfsTa1Tos
Unllem n. Hughes. &C administrator dc boais
- q tho estate OF Mary J. Ned, has brought
III ara,sst George }. Hopkins. formerly admin
MN 81 this estate. w. H. shouiy snd william
n bznr1s. bis bondsm ~, for the recovery OF
a0D The complaint alleges sslet tie ds.esd-
~ IIotsins, has ai>zoaaed from King county
ep.l lss emfczxea from the funds Of the estate
erssce5ed % him the amount sned for. Hopkins
~ n1poiniei administrator at the essste by .
6ne,oe 81 fhe probate court Of January, isSa. he
"a il regulate bond with W. II. ehoufy and
WlliIzn Dennis as suretics. In May, 1853. Hop
i.uss kticrs Of admin stfation were revoked b;
1eafmemt Of the Probate court. aad icite OF
o0ntalsttut!0n dg boMis non we're erauted TO the
pinlnNE. On the 9th OF last April the accounts
81 13npkins wSrc settled In the probate court,
ma A<tfce czsesed requiring him 10 pay over 10
lhe present administration 500. which amount
~ lcunl 70 be dro the estate
scaxpALazED HUSBAND.
Willsm ONeii. rAncher liy ing near
9uc1ion. Kissap county, has fled .
eompleint against LIllis Bell o'Neil,
y uhym he was married less than
ttseo months ago. praying for . at
vpece On the grounds Of adultery and dcsertion.
ub wiles maiden name wss Lille Belle Ander-
son and ttey were married In Seattle on Febru-
~ 9Th last The complaint alleges that before
Ihesxpiration Of their honeymoon, on the Is h
81 March, the bride wss guilty OF criminal reia-
tons with one Carries Bunker, and has led an
Impure life since then, having been an inmate
Il ~ Palmer house. the Auxera house, the
1useka house. the New England honse aud the
e1adard theater OF seattle. The husband claims
thst his wiies conduct has brought him into
scAsdalous notofiefy. and he cites as an tn
daace Of this Sensational story recently pub
lkAe6s~ s4n :
sAsrER coz vs. MS CREDITORS.
Jndge Lichtenberg held an evening session.
principally devoted 10 the hearing OF the argu.
msnt On An application for = temporary injunc-
ton IN The cass Of Jasper g Cox W. his ercdi-
ton. The ylaintd 6Ied a petition in insolvency
al the "a of May, He mas . stock OF goods In
walA Wnlla end esattlc. The sheriff OF wAila
y ~sf~f . W. sS<kot44s40, dAc tINttA upon VIC
GOODS thcro "a "a execution and Judgment
gfeated By ths superior court OF waila Wslia 10
Daween JBdse Lichtenberg ordered the
ene1d 70 eprtaf on the 18th of May 10 show
fause WIZ the tDjuuctlon should not be granted
eso Issued an order restraining him from sell
ins Ne goods In the meantime.
TINE pAy WITH JUDGE HuaEs
Sone q the three cases assigned for trial be-
son snoEe Humes were tried yesterday. The
Gaze q James =. Nct;owan vs. David NJ Sharks
g NJ continued until May N. In the case
q Naiander Neatly vs. the Farmers and Mer-
enen's insurance Company. motion 70 dismiss
nnd ior Judgment for defendant was offered by
Voc defendant, and tie case was continued uu-
u Nay p The case OF the Seattle Insurance
company W Boyle & Fiiiey was dropped from
nc si'al calendar The court adjourned the
morning session TO convene this morning
CRIMINAL PLEAS
Andrew kehce. bound over 10 the superior
eolft on charge OF assault with intent 10 COM
MI kfcAf bodily injury. was arraigned aud given
unul today to enter his pea His trial was SIT
for June T.
W J. Pencil plead nos guilty to the charge OF
efscn Tor which he was arraisned Saturday.
and his trial was Axe. for Juns
John Boyle and Maud Gardner bound over
ts .he robbery of Fanny Boyd's diamonds, en-
itfhd their plea OF Tot guilty before Indss
hamcs and their trial was set for May ~
ssSrKseEp FOR ASSAULT.
Thomas Fsnworth. arralgncd iast saturday on
eaarge OF assault with iateat to commit rob-
-. .efy, entefei sis Plea before Judge Huraes in
sae morning. BY the consent OF tho prosecuting
sssernes, the charge az assault with intent 10
Vmmit robbery. was waived. and the prisoner
P'esa ssiiiy 70 tho change ei simple assault. He
Vas sentenced BY Judge names 70 three
.eh'hs Imprisonment IA tic county ,ai; aud
sus rsy ncnt Of the cosss
SoricE or CONFORMATION.
lac seattle Terminal Railway aud Flevater
eonFaay nlei with ths clerk notice 4, the
= 80 OF Washington aud the S:e,son & poss
~ss a.alapsny, informing them tat petition
veaia % made q Judge Slrati0n Tor an order
san iury 10 cmraneIlsJ 10 assess the dam.
skes ios the appropriation ~ a righ,-ef.way
saf shsiy feet IN width through the tide lands
Ss'sEcd ~ The s'etson & Post Mil Company,
ROGERS " gosE Rs
lac esse Of Tho application Of Mina!e Rogers
~ = zee IoFary restraining order AGAINST Ly-
nan IL Rogers, her husband. came 40 for hear.
'ak a. o'clock. Both pSrties appeared by conn.
'ss, and upon motion ~ the pIain,ia. the case
Va dismissed. Mrs Rogers also withersw her
sshfasins In the justice court and that case was
sso dismissed
MECHANICS lIkS ESEsslISaxn
TIC trial OF the salt OF Il Mailalv vs.. James
,sMreell for the foreclosure of mechanics licn.
YES BEARD BY judge LichteaheFg in The after
scen. The eourt granted The plaintiff Judgment
~ sssa The plaintiff claim Was ssss for work
sao nssesisl osee in the erection OF house in
4. Denny addition.
AZ RerGrY JUnaxESr
suSse ischtcahere decreed thar the Kent
s saIa1sare Manufacturing Camrany have =
'aagGen, BY cefsul; against J. : Cox sor sSsa6l.
FINED FoK rgpz HITTING.
NJ Oar sss.A