davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
Los Angeles daily herald., 1890-02-08
LEGAL.
~~~~~~~~~~-~~<~~~~
SUMMONS.

TN THE SUPERIOR COURT OFTHE COUNTY
of Los Angeles, State OF 0alifornia.
The Redoado Beach Company, plaintiff, VS..
Clara Misener defendant.
Action brought in the Superior Court of tho
county of Los Angeles, State OF California, and
the Complaint fled in said county of Los An
geles In the office OF the Clerk OF said Superior
Court.
The people of the State of California send
greeting to Clara Mlsener, defendant.
You are hereby required to appear In an
action brought against you by the aoove-named
plaintiff in the Superior Court of the county of
Los Angeles, State of California. and to answer
exclusive of the day of service), after the
service on you of this summons, if served
within this county; or, If served elsewhere
The said action is brought to obtain the judg-
ment and decree of this Court that it fix a day
within which defendant be required to Dsy to
this plaintiff the said sum of three hun
dred and forty dollars in U. 9. gold coin, de-
ferred payments as Aforesaid with interest
thereon from the 5th day of May, 1888. at the
rate OF eight per cent per annun a. and costs Of
should fail to make such payment to plaintiff
within the time SO fixed by the Court. that de-
be thereafter, that is, from the day last men
toned for the payment of said money. forever
barred and foreclosed OF all right, interest and
es ate Ia and to the land described IN plaintiffs
thereof, and of all right to q conveyance
thereof and that from and after the day so
HXeQ by SalQ Court IOr the payment OF ealQ
money, If the same be not SO paid, plaiutiR be
fully restored to its former rights and estate in
the land described in the comptaint, and the
rights and estate therein which 1t held before
an at the time of the making of said contract,
and that upon the failure of the defendant to
make such payment within the time fixed bv
the Court as aforesaid the title of plaintiff to
the land described in the complaint as against
defendant and all persons claiming under him.
thereupon become good and valid and forever
quieted. and that said defendant thereupon
become forever barred and restrained from as
serting any claim whatever to said land or to
the moneys paid by defendant to plaintiff
under said contract mentioned In plaintiffs
com plant as exhibit A" or to any part or
portion of said land; and for costs of this suit
and for such other or further order or relief as
to the 0surt may seem just and equitable in the
premises, as will more fully appear by refer
encc to the Complaint ON file herein.
And you are hereby notif I'd that If you fail
to appear and answer the said complaint, as
above required, said plaintiff will apply to the
Court for the relief prayed for in plaintiffs
complaint.
Witness my hand and the seal of said Superior
Court of the county of Los Angeles, State of
California, this 25th day of November, A. ID.
1889
(sEALl c. a. DUNSMOOR, Clerk.
ByF. E. LOWRY, Deputy Clerk.
jazz wed1awk lot
Los Angeles daily herald., 1890-02-08
NOTICE OF SrOCKHOLDERS MEET
ING.

TN PURSUANCE OF RESOLUTIONS OF THE
i Board of Directors of the Los Angeles ana
Pacific Railway Company, duly passed on the
9th day of January, 1892. a meeting OF the
stockholders of said companyi is hereby called
to meet on the 18th day of April, 1890. at l.
O'Clock q. m at No. Al North Spring street (the
same being the place where the Board OF
iIectors of said company usually hold tnelr
meetings), in the City of Los Angeles, State OF
creation Of bonded Indebtedness of SAID
company, consisting of three hundred bonds, OF
said com any, numbered from one to tnree
hundred (ssid two numbers inclusiVe). os!u
bonds are to be first mortgage bonds, Sa,d
bonds are to be for one thousand dollars eacn'
and are to be all of the same date, and all pay
able in thirty years from date, and are 10 pesr
'nterest at t. o rate of six per cent per annuI,,
with Interest coupons attached thereto payapiiS
semi annually, and for the securing OF saiu
bonds to further authorize the execution OF
corporate property and franchises of saln COLL
pany, owned at the date of the executi0n "
said mortgage or trust deed, or that may tAeie H.
after be acquired by said company during sns is
running of said bonds to maturity. Tne saiu ~.
bonds and proceeds thereof are to be useu ~
settling and paving the present indebtednes.ss W W
said COMPANY, and in paying for the Iu,.nei M
construction and equipment OF its rosaWs55', ,or
Said meeting of stockholders 1s also callea .oi
the purpose of electiug new Board OF Dltec1iS. b
and for the purpose of transacting any o'nei
By order of the Board of Directors OF the ~; Lys
Angeles and Pacific Railway Company 'nis
9th day OF January, 1890. ,ut
q. W. LUITwIELER, President.
: : AAA'' 's0'''i fes-s2t
Los Angeles daily herald., 1890-02-08
LEGAL.
SALE OF BONDS.
csENrRAI IRRIaATIoN DISTRICT. co

CENTRAb IRRIGATION DISTRICT, COL
u usa, COUNTY. Cal
Notice is hereby Piven by the Board of
said board will, at its Office in the town of Max
we'll In the County of COlusa, in the State OF
California, on the 4th day OF March in the year
$50, at o clock p u m OF said DAY, sell TO the
of the United States, four hundred and fifty
bonds of the said district, to the amount OF
two hundred and twenty-five thousand dollars,
being part of an issue OF bonds sggregating
the sum of seven hundred and fifty thousand
dollars; that sealed pror osals for the purchase
of said bonds will be received by said board
till the day and hour aforesaid, at which time
sid board will open the proposals, and award
the purchase of said bonds to the highest
responsible bidder. but said board reserves the
right to reject sll bids, and will in TO event
sell any of said bords for less than 80 per cent
OF the face value thereof said bonds are dated
the first day of July in the year 1888, and bear
interest at the rate of per cent. per anRum,
payable semi-annnally; any interest accruing
between said date and the date of the sale al d
delivery of said bonds, shall be credited before
delivery, on the first m maturing coupons attached
to said bonds Said bonds will be delivered to
the successful bidder, and the money received
therefor at the District Treasurer's Office in the
town OF Maxwell, or at the Colusa County Bank
in the town of Colusa, County and State afore-
said, and each proposal must be accompanied
by certified check in favor of K. De Lappe
Secretary of the Board of Directors of Contra i
irrigation District, for an amount at least as
great as per cent of the amount total to be
paid for the bonds bid for.
(Above bonds approved by Supreme Court)
The Supreme Court has decided that Central
Irrigation District was validly organized and
that its bonds were properly issued and are in
the form required by law. See Central Isriga-
ton District VS.. r, De Lappe, 70 Cal. 351.
R. DE LAPPE,
Secretary of said Board.
Maxwell, CAL, January %, 1890.
ja3ld-tO mara
Los Angeles daily herald., 1890-02-08
GAL.
-o-N~~~-~-~-NN-N-~~-~N~~~
SUMMONS.

TN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
,couniy OF Los Angeles, State of California.
y Inc Kedondo Beach Company, plaintiff, VS..
oskar Huber and Chas. Mensch, defendants.
Action brought in the Superior Court of the
county OF Los Angeles State of California, and
the complaint filed in said county OF Los Ange-
Court
&C. P. Section 4O7.
Tne People of the State of California send
greeting to oskar Huber and Chas. Mensch,
You are hereby required to appear in an ac-
ton brought against you by the above-named
plalntih IN the superior Court of the county of
Los Angeles, State OF California, aud TO an
swer the Com plant fled therein, within ten
days exclusive of the day of service) after the
service on you of this summons-if served
within thirty days
The said action Is brought to obtain the
Judgment and decree Of this Court that it fix a
day within which defendants be reouired to
pay to this plaintiff the said sum of twenty
four hundred and seventy dollars in U S. gold
coin, deferred payments as aforesaid, with in
terest thereon from the 18th day of April,
1883. at the rate of eight per cent per annum,
and costs OF suit and that in the event the de-
fendaDt should fail to MAKE such paymeut TO
plaintiff within the time so fixed by the Court,
that defendant and all persons claiming under
him e thereafter, that is, from the day last
mentioned for the payment of said money,
forever barred and foreclosed of all right, in
terest anG estate in and to the land described
every psrt thereof, and OF all right to a con-
veyaace thereof. and that from and after the
day SO fixed by said Court for the payment of
said money, If the same be not so paid, plain
tiff be fully restored to Its former rights and
estate in the land described IN the complaint
and the rights and estate therein which 1t held
before and at the time OF the making of said
contract, and that upon the failure of the de
fendant to make such payment within the
time fixed by the Court as aforesaid the title OF
plaintiff to the land described in the complaint
as against defendant and all persons claiming
under him, thereupon become good and valid
and forever quieted, and that said defendant
thereupOn become forever barred and re-
strained from asserting any claim whatever to
said land or to the moneys paid by defend ant
to plaintiff under said contract mentioned in
plaintiff complaint as "Exhibit A." or to any
psrt or portion of said land; and for costs of
this suit, and for such other or further order or
relief as to the Court may seem just and equita-
Bile in the premises, as will more fully appear
by reference to the complaint on file herein.
And you are hereby notified that if you fail
to appear and answer the said complaint, as
aboV e required, said plaintiff will apply to the
Court for the relief prayed for in plaintiffs
complaint.
Witness my hand and the seal of said Supe-
rior Court of the county of Los Angeles State
ot Calf ,rnia, this 10th day of November, A. D
1889.
(SEAL) G. II. DUNsMoOR, Clerk.
By F. +. LOWRY, Deputy Clerk.
ja23 tn lot law
Los Angeles daily herald., 1890-02-08
LEGAL.


TN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
d. R. Brearley, plaintiff vs.. Lizzie Baker,
Thomas Fitzpatrick and William Riley, de-
fendants.
Action brought in the Superior Court of the
the complaint filed in said county of Los An
geles in the Office of the Clerk of said Superior
Court,
The people of the State of California send
greeting to Lizzie Baker and Thomas Kilpat-
rick defendants.
You are hereby required to appear in an
action brought against you by the above
named plaintiff in the Superior Court of the
county of Los Angeles, State of California, and
to answer the complaint filed therein, within
ten days exclusive of the Gay of servioe) after
the service on you of this summons, if served
within this county; or, If served elsewhere,
within thirty days, or Judgment by default will
be taken against you according to the prayer of
said complaint
The said action is brought to foreclose the
lien against lot 10, block IA, Pioneer Building
Lots Association Tract, in the city of Los An
geles, county and State aforesaid, created by
intendent of Streets of said city for grading
Sichel street, the amount of said assessment
against said lot 10 being $102. 36-for attor-
neys' fees and for costs of suit. Reference is
had to complaint for particulars,
And you are hereby notified that If you fail
to appear and answer the said complaint as
above required the said plaintiff will cause
your default to be entered, and apply to the
court for the relief demanded in the complaint
Given under my hand and the seal of the
State of California, this 25th day of September,
in tho year of our Lord one thousand eight
hundred and eighty-nine
[SEAL.] CHAS. H. DUNSMOOR, Clerk.
By f. B. TANNING, Deputy Clerk
Jones & Carlton, attorneys for plaintiff.
p3O satlOt
Los Angeles daily herald., 1890-02-08
NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE SALE.

THE BRUNSWICK BALKE COLLENDER
i Co., corporation, plaintiff, vs. G. 8. Lee
and O. 3 Harrison. defendants.
SheriHs Sale. No IL ,4O4.
Order Of Sale and Decree of Foreclosure and
Sale
Under and by virtue of an order of sale and
decree of foreclosure and sale, issued out of the
Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles,
State of California, on the l1th day OF Janu
ary, A. D. 1890, in the above entitled action,
corporation, the aboye-named plaintiff, OBJ
tanned judgment and decree of foreclosure
and sale against G. S. Lee, ct al. de-
PENDANTS. on the 11th day of January
A. D. 1890, for the sum of 5000 dollar
in lawful money of the United States, which
A. d. 1880, recorded in judgment book 15 of
said Court, at page "a, am cOmman to sell
all that certain lot, piece, or parcel OF
land, situate, lying and being in the County OF
Los Angeles State OF California, and bounded
and described as follows:
Lot four a, block +, Sunset tract, according
to map thereof, recorded in book IL, page
Al of miscellaneous records, in the Recorders
office, of the County of Los Angeles, State OF
California.
Public notice is hereby given, that on Mon
day, the 3rd day of March, A. d. 1890, ST
~ o'clock M. of that day, in front OF the Court
House door of the County of Los Angeles on
Spring street, / will, in obedience to said order
OF sale and decree OF foreclosure and sale, sell
the above described property, or SO much there
of as may be necessary to satisfy said Judgment,
with interest and costs, etc., to the highest and
best bidder, for cash lawful money of the
United States.
Dated this 7th day ofFebruary, 1890;
Sheriff of Los Angeles County.
By A. ID. THORNTON, Under Sheriff.
SMITH, WINDER SMITH, Attorneys for
Plaintiff.
Los Angeles daily herald., 1890-02-08
SUMMONS.

TN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
i County of Los Angeles, State of California.
The Redondo Beach Company, plaintiff VS..
Clark l. Ruling, defendant.
Action brought in the superior Court OF the
county Of Los Angeles, State of California, snd
the complaint filed in said county of Los Ange-
les, in the Office of the Clerk of said Superior
Court.
The people of the State of California send
greeting to CLARK l.. Huling, defendant.
You are hereby required TO appear In an
action brought sgainst you by the above named
plaintiff iu the superior Court of the county OF
LCA Angeles, state of CalifOrnia, and to answer
the complaint filed therein, within ten days
exclusive OF the day or service) after the ser
this county; or, II served elsewhere, wltn1n
thirty days.
The said action is brought to obtain the
fix day within which defendant be required
to pay to this plaintiff the said sum of six
hundred and fifty dollars. in U. 9. gold
est thereon, from the 18th day of April. 1888, at
the rate of eight per cent. per annum, and costs
of suit; and that in the event the defendant
should fail to make such payment to pla1ntiff
within the time so fixed by the Court, that de-
fendant, and all persons claiming under him,
be thereafter, that is from the day lasc men,
toned for the payment of said money, forever
barred and 70 eclosed of all right, interest and
estate in aud 10 the land described in plaintiff
complaint. and said contract and every part
thereof, and of all right to- conveyance
fixed by said Court for the payment of said
money, if tue same be not SO paid, plaintiff be
fully restored to Its former rights and estate in
the land described in the complaint, and the
rights ard estate therein which it held before
and st the tine of TIE making of said contract,
aud that upon the failure of the defendant to
make such payment within the time fixed by
the Court as aforesaid the title of plaintiff to
the land described in the complaint as against
defendant and all persons claiming under him,
thereupon become good and valid and forever
quieted, and that said defendant thereupon be-
come forever barred and restrained from as
serting any claim whatever to said laud or to
the moneys psld by defendant to plaintiff
under saia Contract mentioned in plaintiff s
complaint as exhibit A.' or to any part or
portion OF said land; and for costs of this suit
and for such other or further order or relief as
TO the Court may seem just a equitable in the
premises rs will more fully appear by refer
ence to the complaint on file herein
And you are hereby notified that If you fail
to appear and answer the said complaint, as
above required, said plaintiff will app y o the
Court for the relief pras ed for in plaintiff S
complaint
Witness my hand and the seal of the said Su-
perior Court, of the county of Los Angeles,
State of California, this 25th day of November,
A. d. 1889.
(SEAL) G. Fl. DUNSMOOR Clerk.
By F. E. LOWRY, Deputy Clerk.
ja24-fri-1Ot
Los Angeles daily herald., 1890-02-08
SUMMONS.

TN THE SUPERIOR COURT oFTHE COUNTY
i of Los Angeles, State OF California
The Redondo Beach Company, Plaintiff, vs..
Geo B Noble, defendant.
Action brought in the Superior Court of the
County of Los Angeles. State of California. and
the Complaint filed in said County OF Los An
geles in the Office of the Clerk of said Superior
The people of the State of California send
greeting to Geo. r. Noble, defendant
You are hereby required to appear in an ac-
ton brought against you by the above-named
plaintiff in the Superior Court of the County
of Los Angeles Stats of California, and to all
swer the Complsint hied therein, within ter ten
Sc vice on you of this Summons, If served
within this county; or, If served elsewhere,
within thirty days.
The said sction is brought to obtain the judg-
ment and decree of this Court tina. it fix day
within which defendant be required to pay to
this plaintiff the said sum of six hundred and
fifty five dollars in U. y. Gold Coin, deferred
payments as aforesaid with interest thereon
from the Sth day of April, 1888. at the rate Of
eight per cent. per annum and coats OF suit
and that in the event the defeudant should fail
to make such payment to plaintiff within the
time so fixed by the Court that defendant and
all persons claiming under him, De thereafter,
that is, from the day last mentioned for the
payment of said money, forever barred and for
closed OF all rigat interest and estate in and to
the land described in plaintiffs complaint and
said contract and every part thereof, and OF all
right to q conveyance thereof, and that rom
aud after the day so fixed by said Court fer The
payment of said money, if the same be not so
paid, plaintiff be fully restored to its former
rights and estate in the land described in The
complaint and the rights and estate therein
which it held before and az the time OF the
making of said contract, and that upon the
failure OF the defendant to make such pay ment
Within the time fixed by the Court as aforesaid
the title of plaintiff to the land described in the
cor p aint as against defendant and all persons
claiming under him, thereupon become good
and valid and forever quieted, and thst SAID
defendant thereupOn become forever barred
and restrained from asserting any claim " mat
ever to SAID land or to tie moneys paid by de-
tendant to plaintiff upder said contracS men
TONED in plaintiffs complaint rs 'ExhibiS A, 7"
or to any part or portion of said land; and for
costs OF this suit and for such other or further
order or relief as to the Court may teem Just
and equitable in the premises, as will more
fnlly appear by reference to the complaint on
file herein.
And you are hereby notified that If you fail to
appear and answer the said complaint, as above
required. said plaintiff will apply to the Court t
for the relief prayed for in pla1ntif'sa com
Witness my hand and the seal OF said Supe-
rior Court, of the County of Los Angeles, State
OF California, this 25th day of November, A. d.
1889.
(sEAL) G. H. DUNsMOOR, Clerk.
By r. e. LOWRY Deputy Clerk.
ia2A- -fri-1Ot
Los Angeles daily herald., 1890-02-08
SUMMONS.

TN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF TIE STATE
i OF California, in and for the County of Los
Angeles.
Farmers and Merchants Bank of Los Angeles,
a corporation, plaintiff; vs.. David Pearl, de-
fendant
Action brought in the Superior Court of the
Los Angeles, and the complaint filed in said
County of Los Angeles in the Office of the Clerk
of said Superior Court
The people of the 8 ate of California send
greeting to David Pearl, defendant.
You are hereby required to appear In an
! action brought sgainst you by the above named
California in and for Los Angeles county, and
to answer the complaint filed therein, within
TIN days exclusive OF the day of service). aft
the iervice on you of this summons If served
within this county; or, If served elsewhere,
within thirty days, or JUDGMENT by default will
be taken against you according to the prayer OF
| said comple int.
The said action is brought to recover of you
| the sum of 81 ,O5o, with interest on $1,000
| thereof, from April 22d, 1889, at the rate of
| ten per cent. per annum, compounded monthly.
alleged to be due from you to the plaintiff
herein, on your certain promissory note for the
| sum of 81 eco. dated December 22d 1888, run
L il to the plaintiff, payable one day after date,
with interest at the rate of ten per cent. per
| annum pay able monthly, and If not so paid, to
| be compounded monthly, together with five per
cent of principal as attorneys fees in case suit
is bi ought thereon, and for costs of suit
Reference is had to complaint for particulars.
And you are hereby notified that II you fall TO
appeST duu busNer INC STU OoiHpioiho % "oO'S
required, the said plaintiff will cause your de-
fault to be entered, and will take Judgment
sgainst you for said sum OF $1,000 with in
terest on 81 600 thereof from April 22d, 1889.
at ten per cent. per annum, compounded
monthly, and costs of this S ut
Given under my hand and the seal of the
Superior Court of the State of California. in
md for the County OF Los Angeles this 31st
day of January, in the year of our Lord one
thousand eight hundred and ninety.
(sEAL) CHAS. H. DUNSMOOR, Clerk.
By d. e. ADAMS, Deputy ClerK.
GRAVES, O'MELvENY q SHANKLAED,
Attorneys for Plaintiff.
"a
Los Angeles daily herald., 1890-02-08

TN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
L OF California, County of L os Angeles-ss.
In the matter of the estate OF Otto Mueller,
deceased.
will, etc.
Notice ,s hereby given that Friday, the
14th DAY OF February, 1880. at 10 o'clock. am.
of said day, at the court room of this Court,
Department Two thereof, corner Franklin and
New High streets, in the city of Los Angeles,
County of Los Angeles, and State of California,
have been appointed as the time and place for
hearing the application of Mich ael Mueller pray
ing that document now on file in this Court,
purporting to be the last Will and Testament Of
the said dec ased, be admitted to probate, tina
letters testamentary be issued thereon to him,
at which time and place all persons inte: e:ested
therein may appear and contest the same.
Dated February Sd, 1890.
q. II. DUNSMOOR, County Clerk.
By NJ. j. AsHMORE, Deputy.
HUTTON & SwANwICK, Atty for petitioner.
41lt
Los Angeles daily herald., 1890-02-08

The co-partnership heretofore existing bet
weeu E. L. stern, Leon Loeb and B. Stern, all
residents of the City of Los Angeles, and doing
business under the firm name of stern, Loeb
Il Co., lin the City and Countv of Los Angeles.
and State OF California. having expired on the
first day of February, 1890, is hereby renewed.
In witness whereof, we have hereunto set our
hands, the 1st day Of February 1890.
E. L. STERN. (seal)
L. LOEB. (seal)
q. STERN (seal.)
Los Angeles, Cal, February 1, 1890.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss
County of Los Angeles ss'
On this Sd day of February, 1890, before me,
N. Lindenfeld, @ Notary Public, in and for the
County of Los Angeles, personally appeared E
L. Stern, Leon Loeb and B Stern, to me person
ally known to be the individuals described in
and who executed the foregoing Instrument
and they thereupon acknowledged to me that
they executed the same.
In witness whereof, / have hereunto sec my
hand and official seal, the day and year In
this certificate first above written,
(sEAL,) N. LINDENFELD,
Ncrsry public.
fe8-eats-3t