The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1890-07-22
RIGHT OF WAY.
roeds Move to Dissolve Re
straining Order.
i 1vjsr SHOW BETTER CASE.
r..,e 6ives Fair warning to the
,..sssf9-City Grade suits-Cases
ID Admiralty.

...t;on to dissolve the temporary
.sss5ps order granted the city last
!. ..zs.~ s,iofuing the Puget Sound Shore
3 zS.ss,.sd Company against extending its
|<.!..s. rnrthward across Columbia street
1s;,rosd avenue. was heard Yesterday
8 +. ....,ou IN the equity department. The
- ~ overruled by Judge Lichfen-
- 81 = giving his decision the court
5 b. ~ animated that the evidence intro
- 4 hebaIf of the city was not suffi-
Z q s susssin the injunction on the final
..1s, ~ the case on its merits, and
- he city attorney that 1t would
q = necessary to produce . stronger
-. 8 rrfutstiou Of the defendants evi
Mccall. Turner and Burleigh,
zs Tan H. Mitchell appeared for the
- ~ eonad Shore Railroad Company
n - Northern Pacific, as its successor,
8 fslonei j. C. Haines appeared for the
||'7.s.h;a q Puget Sound The motion
;ss rsuported by afidavits OF /. A.
: = - James Mcknight and John II.
I ss.ksli These aftidavits allege that the
- traffic demands the extension of
~ trreks TO the northern limits of the
~, The Atlantis also set forth that last
1870 While the negotiations were pend
pa - the purchase of the Puget Sound
-. Railyoad. the Northern Pacific made
Sruupcsifion to Mayor Moran and Conn-
'au11n Durie to accept thirty feet on Rail-
- avenue in exchange for the old right
- 81 the Puget Sound Shore railway.
- ia franchise to the Seattle & Mon
~ Rsilrosd Company. leaving but sixty
~ = Railroad avenue undisposed
= - company made another propo-
- % the mayor and Councilman
-. agreeing to accept twenty-five feet
= Ia d the old right-of-way. and on
I,sn & sfter the franchise had been
S1u1od % the Union Pacific. the company
~ vish the city clerk al application
w11he 70 accept jointly with the Union
- lourteen feet. There was then left
Il 1leht feet on Railroad avenue, not
- for one track.
honsxer TO the affidavit OF /. A. Ma
- she city fled the sffidavits of Mayor
resn and Councilman Durie and Wall
ku1Srd These depositions deny G neraliy
~ allsrnfions OF the defense. They state
- snrly in January they were approached
y Counsel Mcknight and Nadeau. and
~ q informal discussion on the subject
Z riehs-of-way on Railroad avenue. in
saleh Mr.. Mcknight spoke OF
- uncertainty of the settlement
Z IL tide land question then pending in
- lerislafure. He admitted the states
1T 3 the lands, and said that should it
lily 81 decided that they belonged to the
Eaitsd States, his company should claim
1fahtoi-xay Of 800 feet. The atlantis say
III fkey heard nothing further from the
unp6ny until after the franchise to the
nsae & Montana was granted In the
noantims they heard that the Northern
Isrf6c vas locating line on the east side
Z Lake Washington, leaving Seattle on
~ track, and concluded that they did
rot want . nght-of-way on Railroad
eysnue.
Ehs final hearing Of the case win be
heard q soon Is possible after vacation,
probably tke second week in September.
the conpanys counsel being anxious to
1ass ~ hearing as soon as possible. They
eSlrsss perfect confidence that the injunc-
TN vii not be sustained
crrY GRADE SUITS.
~ following suits were fled by the
dky storney against delinquents on as
xsnents for street improvements:
Esvsnth Elizabeth A. Mills. $s5;
Edaard L Terry, s232.75; Mrs. Anna
Ardnef, sos; Charles T. Terry. SHOES
Prospect avenue-George f. Mover, $231;
Thomas Coffin. Sis: Robert B. Crosier ct
4. 81: ]. A. Gould. $a31.
MISCELLANEOUS FrLrHas.
y. .. Ballard fled suit against the city
y recover ss,i9l.1S on city warrants held
~ the plaintiff The warrants were issued
for The Improvement of James street in
~ aud for the improvement of Washing
Ton street In lsS3.
Rsss Bros. & Co. vs. Aaron Cohn-Euit
ior Judgment for $s,907.47.
CAiherg & Gardner VS.. A. Cohn-Suit to
recoser $50. commission on real estate.
6ordon Hardware Co. VS.. L. +. Hopkins
suit for $l9l75.
uoroon Hardware Co. vs.. Ballard Manu-
ncfuring Co.-Suit to recover $1oS22.
hercisse Pepin vs.. John Belisle, s. Bax-
e and John Goodfellow-Suit for forecios-
ne OF ehattel mortgage for s., los on log
Rng camp and fixtures.
taafies +. Frasch VS.. Queen chop
noHse-Attachment suit for $2s4 AZ.
J. Martenson q Co. vs.. ]. +. Badere-
'uli Tor judgment for s., 1874 81, on account.
G. Van Nicer VS.. Lizzie Mcneil and
winnie Tnomas-Suit for $3.50 on promis-
ny note.
N ADMIRALTY.
Another libel was fled against the
Hamer Detroit by ]. +. Mears and VIII
an A. Glenn. The formers claim is SIS
y RACES as night watchman, and the latter
1eses that there is due him $50 as salary
chief engineer.
An intervening libel against the steamer
NtToii Tor sA25 for furniture was fled by
.srk & Cspen. in the case OF the Seattle
'aruvare Company VS.. the steamer De-
loit
4 aoel was fled against the steamer
'cex Hunter in the United States district
0hfs OF ]. I. T. Mitchell. The libel al
'sss that the libellant agreed with John
nehy, the owner of the boat, to convert
y vessel from 8 sailing boat into 3 steamer
Z slo. which he did, bat las not re-
ssvsd his pay.
THE POLICE COURTS.
SkPoeket Perkins Given Thirty Days
DfSardarfu