St. Paul daily globe., 1890-02-01

taken. want now to enter my protest.
| dispute the right of the speaker To re-
cord in the journal of the proceedings
of the house any direction or order that
or any other member may not make.
1t is the Journal of the proceedings of
the house, by the constitution. and not
the journal of the proceedings of the
speaker of the house. You have no
more right to inject anything into the
journal than any individual on the floor
has. You have gone forward.
YOU HAVE USURPED POWER.
You have mutilated the record of the
house in order to carry out the scheme
you have deliberately gone to work to
carry out. Deliberately. l say, because
you went forward day and night to
vamp up some feeble show to sustain
your views. No tyrant ever assembled a
throne who did not attempt to make
some feeble show to amuse the people
when he gained the possession of the
kingdom. You, sir, have attempted to
yamp up some feeble show 10 sustain
your outrageous rulings, to amuse the
galleries and to amuse the people, while
you conSummated and carried out the
beheSt of the chairman of the ReDub-
llcan national committee to turn out the
representatives of the people elected to
seats on the floor, and put in men who
are not only not elected, but who do not
command the respect of the
constituents they seek here to
represent. Now, proceed in this
matter; but in the language of the inn
mortal Emmett, we propose to dispute
every inch of ground, burn every blade
of grass, and the intrenchment of lib
erty shall be our graVe.w The scene III
the house during the delivery of Mr..
Bynum's philippe was even more dis
orderly than any of those enacted yes
terday. Cheers and Kisses were inter-
mingled as Mr.. Bynum proceeded; jeerS
came simultaneously with hand-clap-
ping; groans were followed by shouts
of applause. Cries of "Sit down."
1'Good-byel' and "Hire halW came
from the Republicans. Shouts of go
it, ByRumP' you're rlghtP' "Speak to
the end!' from the Democrats. Mem
bers rose in their seats and shouted for
recognition from the speaker. The
scene was one of general confusion, and
the galleries helped it. Mr.. Bynum
ended his remarks by appealing from
the decision of the chair in refusing to
allow his motion to adjourn. The
speaker made brief reply. He said
the proceedings of the house, so far as
the chair was concerned, had been
orderly. Here the Democrats hissed
and groaned.l The speaker refused to
entertain the appeal. Mr.. Springer
THEN JUMPED TO HIS FEET
and moved TO adjourn. The speaker
refused to entertain the motion. Mr..
Springer entered an appeal. and MIR.
Mckinley moved to lay the appeal on
the table. The yeas and nays were
ordered on Mr.. McKinley's motion and.
q m lE. ols .rly
to call the roll. Mr.. Springer continued
to speak and the Democrats encouraged
him by applause. The speaker an
nOunced the roll call as 100 yeas and no
nays. He counted in sufficient num-
Der OF Democrats to make up a quorum.
Another scene enSued and during it the
speaker recognized Mr.. Dalzell. Mr..
Crisp endeavOred to raise the question
of consideration and tried to appeal to
the chair, but the speaker refused to
entertain the appeal. Mr.. Crisp denied
the right of the chair to class his motion
as dilatory motion and protested
against the speakers action, which, he
said. was in disregard of all parliament
ary rule. Mr. DalZell then took the
floor and began to present the views of
on the contested election case of Smith
against jackson. The Democrats
showed disposition on the start to in
terrupt Mr.. Dalzell. but Mr.. Crisp, of
Georgia, rose and, addressing his Dem
Ocratic colleagues. said that the election
case had been taken up against their
protest, but that it was up and they
should give it quiet hearing so they
might pass upon it intelligently. This
advice was acted upon and Mr.. Dalzell
continued his argument. When he fin
ished. the house at 4:30 p. m. adjourned.