Indian chieftain. [volume] (Vinita, Indian Territory [Okla.]) 1882-1902, 1890-09-18

Cooweescoowee Circuit Court
A Long Docket.

NuI OF HidlHNln Aoi AhN hulp AhN Wv
damages, Appeal taken.
I'll. Akin VS.. Jane Rogers et.al.; il
plea OF debt on note of hand. Yer
diet for plaintiff for three-fourths oi
amount claimed.
II G. Shuieldt vs.. Jerry Butler
suit for trespass and possession OF an
improvement erected on legal quarter
OF mile limits Of plaintiff. Dismissed
at plaintiff cost.
Carrie Thompson vs. J +. Fhomp-
son; suit for recovery Of part Of estate
of Martin Thompson. Continued.
b. f. Mcdaniel, administrator, VS.,
Sue NJ. Adair; suit for possession OF
old improvement Of l.. B Mcdaniel
valued at 81 500 Placed on heel Of
docket.
Mary A. Barker vs. Mary Coyel
Holderman; suit for possession Of m
Improvement valued at $500, located
on Russe creek. Dismissed at plaint-
iff's cost.
Nancy Galcatcher Va. Ophelia Walk
ingstick; suit for possession OF an inn
provement valued at 500 and another
improvement valued ut $500, Verdict
for plaintiff. Appeal taken.
w. +. Roberts VS.. Ed Byrd and L.
Marks; suit for possession Of 10000
feet of walnut timber valued at $500.
Verdict for plaintiff for $3.50 Motion
for an appeal filed.
Lizzie Bowlin VS.. Joseph Hunt; suit
for an Improvement on Pryor Greek !.
Dismissed on motion and appealed by
plaintiff on rule OF court.
X. NJ. Allen VS.. Jno. l.. Ball; suit for
an improvement on Big Greek. With
drawn by mutual consent.
Susie +. Mayes VS. John W. Mayes;
suit for divorce and alimony. Dis
missed at plaintiffs cost; motion for
an appeal entered.
Beatrice A. Markham, administra-
trix vs. Polly Archer ct. al; suit for
two-thirds Of an improvement belong
to estate Of Nancy Alberty. Stricken
from docket.
Susan Bowles vs,George yann .et. AL; /;
suit for possession Of an improvement
in Cooweescoowee district. Name OF
George vann stricken from case as not
being interested. Continued for want
of time.
Mary Flanagan VS.. A II. Naggs, ad-
ministrator; suit for possession of two
thirds Of the property belonging 10 the
estate Of Sarah Naggs. Continued by
mutual consent.
J. q. Bratcher vs.. Wm. NJ. Smith
. aud wife; suit tor par1 Of .sn ixnPrsye-.
ment situated on Panther creek. Dis
at plaintiffs : cost on account Of bond
in case not being made out before the
clerk as the law directs.
}. NJ, Beard VS.. D. L. Denny; suit
for possession Of an improvement To-
Gated in the town of Claremore. Judg-
ment rendered in favor OF defendant.
Appealed.
J. F. Mcclellan VS.. Abe Crittenden;
suit for possession Of improvement
located on the legal quarter Of mile
limit OF plaintiff Dismissed on ac-
connt OF minority OF plaintiff, at his
cost.
A. G. Cunningham VS.. Charles
Haynes et.al.; suit for possession 0 an
Improvement. Continued foI want Of
time.
J. L. Mizer VS.. Ned Taylor: papers
not served
Nick Rogers ys. Houston Rogers ct.
al; suit for possession Of improvement
located on the quarter Of mile limit Of
plaintiff Bond not flied by plaintiff
and d smlssed at his cost.
f. \. Nelson vs.. John Ward aud
wife, suit for the possession Of an i'm
provement located en- the quarter Of a
milo limit OF plaintiff. Continued for
want of time.
Charles Reeves vs.. Bessie Reeves,
suit for divorce. Case dismissed at
plaintiffs cost and molten for an ap-
peal taken.
Susie T. Mayes vs. John W. Mayes;
suit for 1910. Continued for want of
time.
Sarah Gage vs.. C. W. TaIber,; pa
pers not served.
Bert Holderman vs.. Tom Rogers;
suit for possession Of an improvement.
Papers not served.
John sarcoxie vs.. Pati-a-caw; suit
for divorce. Confessed judgment by
Joe Bennett, defendants attorney.
Jane Adams, administrators, VS. T..
Mayfield and wife; suit for S270, with
interest on Sl70 from January q, 1883,
until paid and 500 from August 30,
1887 until paid. Dismissed at plant
IDS cost on account Of there being no
bond
Luella Raines vs. Joseph Raines;
suit for divorce. Papers not served
Virginia Ford VS. s. S. ford; papers
not served.
John Beard VS. W. Cox; suit for Sl0j
with interest. Papers not served.
Richard Downing VS. Lizzie Downing;
suit for divorce. Dismissed for want
Of prosecution.
Jesse Rowe We John Lynch; suit for
an improvement on Rock creek. Con-
tinued for want Of time.
Minerva Whitmore VS. William No
Bile; suit tor possession Of improve
ment. Papers not served.
Patti Lena Washington VS. George
Washington; suit for divorce Af.er
third call case went by default.
CoOnn1issionarf "a Cyau,.t