The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1890-11-29
THEY DO NOT CONCUR.
Delegates Cannot Agree Will
the Aldermen.
sAlAR,1s STILL UNSETTLED.


$500 =. -.
sssa 1a5ess hlnise-
Ordinances - che Duetos q Hiro
-
y
AZ the ns%tins q The houss 81 dslseaass iass
reported tsvosably On sho hill . n lund she
eity's hoeffng tnd-hesduesx 1ne insUrsst vas
p aced ct por cent He nlled in The nnrn : Of
onlcers Of slecrton. taking fAem from the REQ
oros Of las. eaectfon. He a1so fns M socsion
inst The iieerest ahonld be pravided ioe By IN
ANIMAL levy sum~ient to Al I'D the amount ~
CURED AZ rlso included 3z10oo ior judsments
aWardrd On 6ondemnation 81 propersy which
had not been fncluded This makss the amouns
e . fuad@d ce6t,7ol.65. The bai hns yes 70 90
70 he board Of aIdsemen, and In order % ave
ume q waA given . hurried third reading % q
% reach thai DO y q their uexs mestin4.
Both houses viii mset on r. nday nighk
The house took up the sslssy ordinance - It
sine amended ffsm The beard OF aadefmon,
where ths long continued contest was renewed.
The Amendments uore submitted sepafnsely,
ana M Lansing raised IN obi osaou % lowering
the salary o. the superintendent Of oewsrs, and
the house refused 20 cnnear. This means that
they are In favor Of 81. 500.
The action Of the board in cutting out the Of
~ " AnePectOr u UU1to1o84 83o0 olO0DeQ xno
hoaoA III. 1uldpon favored retaining the Of
ncA he saw no reasoa why there sheuld nos
PC TWO OMEGA He could rec plenty OF work lor
the superintendent Of buildinxs. vharyes and
beideoay and there Wns plenty 81 evidence hat
thsre Vas work enough for an inspector Of
butIdinea
NJ. Barnes did NOS understand that the
superintendent hsd 60 muoh s a.: nfill there
Was some to b done One man couA do q All
with N asoistaut inatead AZ havfns tvo haada
Of ospartmenFa
NJ. Cowden We cure that there was No lear
Of Any city ON ssrs doing too much He had
seen An ordinance providing for an ofa ee to
look alter the care and comfort OF the prisou srs
ana the ehain-Gane lLAugnteEl He protest d
NJ. Kitunger thOughe tnAt the charter was
NOT very clear. bu the intentfon "a evidsnt.
He favored uniling che duties OF botn ofacea
Mr. Hanford sad they could remedy any want
~ an ofdi ance dsaninx his duties.
Mr. shfpley said the boari OF public works
was con -ututed 70 superfntend the expenditure
OF pablo money, sud the superintendent Of
buildings WAS one OF their ON era The inspec.
tor Was one Of the officers appointed nm
der the police powers of the CITY resulat-
tag priyase condu q In erecting premises.
He Conndef that the once came peculiarly
within the Jurisdiction Of ihe Ore department.
He 1nstsnced the case OF New York where one
other whose duty It was 70 see that buildings
were erected in accordance with them. he
maintained that the superintendent Of public
buildings, ETC.. had all the work be could attend
to. He said the board Of aldermen had smoth-
cred the bill, which was the first one paaDod By
ne noue9
Inc nouse fefuaeo % concur.
me ssisy o. tns tupsnneeooeoto q ouildlnes.
wnslves. etc. was tnen reasoned, ana the house
oon uFred ~ putung it o Sl.5o0
Op01 ane seiafy q the secretary OF the board
puzzle wofks tne Mouse refused % con-
49,. - - - sl"sss Psossss
-.
80. ~ ~ a.ue n .ppe.l ssAuss e.
-. s. :. - w aosa.o oncs1' - s.ao
..ss p lsl - xesL Pny acas. :. sASoo
-. . ~ ssaus@ 1ne NOUS Wou'o uos ssree
- ss"M
49, s.a.xy =. : y.nIsoI gig no. e. sncnsf
-. 49, 49, -. - ~ IL ouipaey
sne NOUS reauseo 70 concur
Ii LAn0n9 oe1enoeo the increase proposed
Iof cniei engineer q me nre0oa& but the house
W0asd not concur.