The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1890-12-26
COURT CALENDAR.

creighton, Deputy Attorney-Cfeneral.
Court will open at 10 A. NJ. for prelim'
mary business. Hawaiian jurors attend
at p. NJ, and foreign jurors when noti-
| fed.
HAWAIIAN JURY.
The King VS.. John Kamakaia and ke-
lrhookano; murder. Davidson Kaulu-
kou for kamakaia; Rosa for Keliihoo-
kano.
The King VS.. George Woolsey; assault
and battery. Appeal from Police Court
OF Honolulu. kaulukou for defendant.
The King VS.. Iapeka; house-breaking.
The King VS.. ID. Iosua; liquor selling
without license. Appeal from Police
Court of Honolulu. kaulukou for de-
PENDANT.
The King VS.. James Shaw; assault
and battery. Appeal from Police Court
of Honolulu. kaulukou for defendant.
The King VS.. VIM. Joe ct al vagrancy
Appeal from Police Court of Honolulu
The King VS.. Maikai; larceny.
kauwe (k.) VS.. Noa kailianu; eject
ment. Smith for plaintiff
Kaheana TX. VS.. Nalimu wv } !; eject
ment. Achi for plaintiff; Rosa for de-
PENDANT.
Jhhi.
S. A. Macy ct al. VS. w. Il. Castle;
case. Neumann-Peterson for plaintiffs;
Hatch for defendant.
Kaniku vs. j. NJ Monsarrat; eject
-ment. Achi-Johnson for plaintiff; de-
PENDANT in person.
Robert Pahau ct al VS.. Ipuhao eft al ;
ejectment. Smith for plaintiffs; Thurs
ton-Kane for defendants.
Puka VS.. Eliza Meek ct al; eiectment
Kane for plaintiff; Rosa for defendants
Eliz. Harvey ct al. vs.. Fanny @.
Graham; ejectment. Kaneakua-Joh ohm
son for plaintiff; Brown for defendant
Hawaiian Hotel Stables VS.. E!iz. X
Cummins; trespass. Carter for plain
tiff; Brown for defendant.
Kamakaohua w. VS.. Thow Chow
assignee in bankruptcy; replevin. Dav-
idson for plaintiff; Ashford for defen-
dant.
Wilder & Co. VS.. John Richardson !;
assumpsit. Ashford for plaintiff.
Wilder & Co. VS.. Hawaiian Fruit and
Taro Co.; assumpsit Ashford for plain
tiff.
Emma M. Nakuina ct al. vs.. A. J..
Lopes ct al; ejectment. Magoon for
plaintiff; Rosa for defendant.
FOREIGN JURY.
The King vs.. Chong Hip Hing and
four others; violating Sec 5, Chap. IL :,
Laws 1886, as to gaming. Appeal from
Police Court OF Honolulu. Ashford for
defendants.
The King VS.. Chong Hin; unlawful
possession of opium. Appeal from Po-
lice Court of Honolulu. Magoon for de-
PENDANT.
The King VS.. Fook Chong; unlawful
possession of opium. Appeal from POI
lice Court of Honolulu. Ashford for de-
PENDANT.
The King vs.. w. O'Iialloran; assault
and battery. Appeal from Police Court
of Honolulu. Davidson for defendant.
The King VS.. j. Lyons; selling foreign
goods without license. Appeal from
Police Court of Honolulu
The King VS.. All Sung alias Sam Hoy
burglary. Ashford for defendant.
The King vs.. Angee; perjury fist de-
gree. Ashford for defendant.
The King VS.. All Hung; perjury first
degree Ashford for defendant.
The King VS.. All Fook; perjury first
degree Ashford for defendant.
The King We. All Hung alias Chock
Heen larceny fourth degree; appeal
from Police Court of Honolulu. David
son for defendant.
The King VS. r. Gerke; assault and
battery /; appeal from Police Court Of
Honolulu. Whiting for defendant.
The King VS.. Akana; unlawful pos
session Of opium; appeal from Police
Court of Honolulu. Neumann for de-
PENDANT.
The King VS.. Young John Wing; as
sault and battery; appeal from Police
| Court of Honolulu.
j. T.. Brown VS.. f. j. Hill ct al. as
| sumpsit. Neumann for plaintiff; Brown
for defendants.
Su Wal VS.. J. II. Soper damages
appeal from decision of McCully, j., a
| Chambers Castle-IIatch for plaintiff
appellant; Creighton for defendant.
d. NJ. Crowley VS.. Hawaiian Gazette
| Co.. trespass on the case Davidson
for plaintiff; Hatch for defendant.
j. A. Magoon, administrator, VS.. s
Ahmi; assumpsit. Whiting for plaintiff
Ashford-Hatch for defendant.
VIM. Wallace VS.. +. Hutchinson ct al.
case. Neumann for plaintiff; Whiting
for defendant.
Lau Hee Fan VS.. Lau Shou; trespas
on the case. Neumann for plaintiff
Davidson for defendant.
Leu Sau vs.. Lau Shou; trespass OF
the case Neumann for plaintiff; Da
wilson for defendant.
II. Ludloff vs.. p Neber and T. II
Truschler; trespass on the case. Neu
mann Cor plaintiff; Ashford for defend
ants.
Joe G. Barros VS.. Antoine Borba; as
sumpsit. Ashford for plaintiff; Davidson
for defendant.
E. De Herblay VS. s. Norris; assump
sit. Neumann for plaintiff.
A. J, Campbell VS.. 7. q. Camarinos
covenant. Hatch for plaintiff; Neu
mann for defendant.
Tong On Jan 1. Co vs.. b. +. Dilling
ham; assumpsit. Neumann for plain
tiffs.
X. Oliver vs.. Hawaiian Gazettee Co.
tort Whiting-Neumann for plaintiff
Hatch for defendant.
L. Ahlo VS.. Aka: assnmpsit. Castl
for plaintiff.
K. r.. Rycroft VS.. K. Oliver, Minist,
ofInterior, garnishee asSumpsit. Thnrs
ton for plaintiff; Neu mann for defendan
Trustees B. z. Bishop Estate vs.. Chor
Chow ct al. ejectment. Carter fc
plaintiff.
John Blossom VS.. All Hin, alias T;
Sung; damage; appeal from Polio
| Court OF Honolulu. Magoon for plaiI