Deseret evening news. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1867-1920, 1890-03-14
4 SAD DISAGREEMENT,

II Is sad TO see the t'Liberal'' Do
lihcal brethren split into sections on
subjects regarding questions which
they should be a unit. A syeciaI
question upon which opposing fac
tons Of the fraternity feel more like
seiziug each other 10y the hair Of the
capt. instead Of falling on each
others necks and atiectionately
weeping is in that connected with
the proposed government building
for Salt Lake City.
Those who feel an interest in
this theme would do well to read
and, if their mental digestion is
good, assimiiate the Herald Wash
ingten special which appears in this
issue. After this intellectual exer-
else, let them sit down anu reflect
upon two important alleged ingredi-
ents OF the controversy that has
arisen On this subject. Those who
favor the remodelling Of the
Woman's Home building and its
conversion into a structure in which
the Government business shall he |
conducted claim to be animated hv
purely patriotic motives. Every 1
time they think Of the probability of |
"Uncie sam" being put to the ex-
pense Of purchasing n new site
and erecting a completely new
structure, tIeir financial souls are
varied with monetary grief in
case the proportions Of corpulent
national treasury should be dimin-
ished- 1t is not to be presumed for
a Eoment that auy other motive
Inspires the movement. Such an
idea would be more than absurd.
especially at a time when a real
estate boom is on.
There can be no doubt about these
patriotic economists having an arru-
mento on their side ofthe CONTROVERSY
tina imakss their antagonists
Feel as If they had been
seized where their hair is sbs,t-
the failure Of the Woman's Home
TO accomplish what It's promoters
asserted il would. Three women
anu STA chiliren do not constitute j
a oonc0urse Of inmates for 4 LuiIJ- .
ing Of palatial appearance and pro- :
portions. Itmay be said right here
that the situation depicted in the
plea Of the ec0nomists-wbo are
pained with the prospect Of an I'm !
necessary inrOad upon the national
observation-disclosures beyond suc.
cessfui controversy that the
appropriation for the structure
vas secured by misrepresentation
ina false preteuses. Proof of tbis
vas given at the time, Subsequent I,
being merely oonfirmatorv d
u what was previously exhibited. L
but those who oppose the parties ;
'ho pat up the utilitarian and ecn- :
ionic plea, recoiI with horror at the
are suggestion that the Woman
Industrial Home has proved a .!
AZURE, fact male exceedingly Il
'i'in by the Utah Commission Of
I'd Mrs. Ferry, as well as the 9
resent agitators. This attitude NJ
sian Ing aghast is in conse- to
uence Of ANTICIPATED "d,magad III
'pdtations." That means that IL g
zen a condition were proved, IT d.
'ouid also furnish proof that those so
no Io6bied and urged for the an. To
ropFiation to build the Home were az
50 economists, being parsimopious h.
the use Of truth aud correspond au
gay lavish in dispensing its oppc. al
In attempting to cover the naked. az az
IS 81 the original schemers. the eli
neutrality-suspicious. assert that the is
ONE was procured rs money iai
Prket manipulators sometimes M \,
vest in stoeks--on cultures ), OF
Anticipation forward points the mi
ew'' TO future benefits. mo-
ihls does not agree with the nlea an
urgency which induced Congress Law
make the appropriation, Inorder vel
make this futurity point consistent me
viii be Necessary to change The To ;,
10 In relation to progressive fig der
= "rsolve this problem: IrtbeT1. cor
strial Home had sixteen inmates rea
January, 1889, and nine inmates r rie
august Of the same year, how Dow
9 a period would be necessary 10 dial
the building at The same rats If vii
rease? "a Ing
We 10 not favor the utilization NJ inc
Home by incorporating it ntbe esta
posed government structure, clos
agel
TrDropr,, seen