New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1890-11-17
Clevelands Baking Powder goes farther
than any other, and is Absolutely the Best.

e,suine wear must be acted upon 1t is understood
that among those whose applications have aireaay
been filed are:
H. d. MCINTYRE. be secretary Of the b. j. Z. ana INC
n j. j. G.
H. g. Crickmore to be secretary of the NJ. p. A.
II. IL. Koek. to secretary OF the N Y. j. C.
C.. T. Rowe. 10 be secretary Of the L. r. b. H. a.
c. V. Sass. to be secretary Of the b. b. r. A. ana the
p. c. A. $.
+. A. Lovccraft to be clerk OF course.
J.. y. Salmon be clerk Of course
II. w. Simmons TO be Judge.
j. J. Burke. to be judge.
Clarence Mcdowell to be judge.
j. j.. Caldwell to be starter.
j. H. Coster. : be Handicapped.
Lucicn Appleby. TO be handicaIper.
Mr.. Yosburg. to be handicaDDcr.
David Johnson to be Handicapped.
Besides these applications for licenses there VIII be
several hundred from trainers, jockeys and petty
officials 10 act upon
At a recent meeting Of the English Jockey. Club
October 22) at Newmarket the Duke of ST. Adams
moved TO omit Rule 14I," which reads as follows:
An running two or more horses In race may
declare win with OF them and such declaration must
be made at scale. jockey riding horse with which
has declared to win must on no account
stop such horse except in favor OF the stable
whose behalf declaration to win has been made
a lively discussion Immediately arose. BRIEF report
of which appears in The Racing Calendar,p ~ n'
but little m3re than year since was e re 81 the
public in the dark as 20 all debates but every
thing Of popular interest is published 10 the world
The Duke st. Adams said II was curious GOMEZ
dence that there rule against stopping horse
in the rules Of racing. The club must put Oh one
side the fallacy that it was possible TO put out OF
sight those transactions OF gambling which were con-
nected with the turf and it must be clear to them tiat
under Rule 14I all INSCRIPTIONS NAL might Perpetitc
great frauds One reason for the rule might be That
future race Was that IN the interest OF sport
it might be penalty might attach 4 he won with
encouraged Or 1t might be that the owner did not
wish to knock two good horses about. In that case
he had better leave at home. one of the reasons
against 1t that horse pulling up III favor OF MS
stable companion would interfere with other horses IN
the race. Certainly, If he had dangerous rival In
his path, the Second horse would be most unlikely to
start only horse for There was an old act
of Parliament of 174O which made Illegal for any one
10 s.ae alo OWEN Williams seconded the notion
Mr.. LOwtler hoped that the Duke Of ot. Adams
would not press the notion He need not tell his
noble friend that 1T quite effective way To
of his speed for the first half mile by jerking him up
Just before getting the judges chair. If the rule
were omitted IL would hencefOrth be contrary 10 the
Rules of Racing TO start second horse with view Of
regulating the pace. II anybody wanted to pull a
horse in such race as the Derby, and he CMr.
jec he would advise him to take that his chance
was extingulshcd in the first half three quarters
Of mile
rule might be amended by making the declaration
compulsory say twenty four hours before the race
that it could appear In the morning papers, and on
The Duke of st. Adams said with reference to Mr..
Lowter's remarks. that Of course it was quite open
TO an owner to make horse go at the best pace and
directly horse beaten there was rule against
II being pulled up. Mr.. Iowther had told the club
from his experience the best way OF losing a race
Mr. Lowther pointed out that he did not say from his
personal experience and there the matter dropped
for the present.