New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1890-01-21
THEY BOTH Want ABSOLUTE DTVORCF.
CHARGES MADE AGAINST EACH OTHER BY
CAPTAIN Avn Mrs. rpANK uApprSoN

CHARGES MADE AGAINST EACH OTHER By
CAPTAIN AND MRS FRANK HARRISON
witness for the defence being absent the case of
Harrison against Harrison. in the supreme Court
Part II. before Judge Lawrence. was postponed from
Yesterday til to-day. Each for absolute divorce
According 10 the statements made in tie papers on
file In the case. a. quoted 10 Tribune reporter by
II. II. Cmttcndcn. counsel for the plaintiff. Henry
Ward Bcechcr married. eleven years ago. Miss Ncla
De Ges and Captain Frank Harrison Of the l3ih
Regiment. Miss De Gcs was an attractive and hand
some young woman. Captain Harrison a good hook
ing man Of social standing had Inherited from his
grandmother life interest in property at N,w
Rochelle from which he ENJOYS a yearly income ~
a. 900. The couple went 10 live I'm Hanson
Place In Boollyn. captain Harrison, IL i, alleged.
became acquainted with school glrl named Louise
Foreman, who lived with her mother, n widow. at 40.
- Clinton Place The Captain. it is charged. after
meeting and walking with her upon the streets
for number Of time, began 10 call
upon her at her mothers house. whore
her mother and two brothers came to look upon
him a. her accepted sutton. In something less than
"A year after their acquaintance the girl became a
mothdi, Captain Harrison. hhc complaint says
called upon the girl during her Illness and permitted
himself 10 be declared by the family the husband
and father.
This child dcl but the plaintiff alleges that
Captain Harrison continued his relations with the
woman, and two years later another child wa, born
which is still living, and has always been ac-
knowcdgcd by Captain Harrison his own. II IS
charged also hy the plantn that "a third child was
born, which died IN the spring ~ lo-0.
Until last February Mrs. Harrison knew nothing
ut all Of her husbands alleged relation with the
Foreman woman, but had lived contcntcdy with him
at their homes in Brooklyn aud New Rochelle. and
had borne him two children, both OF whom living.
This !, the palntin', Gaze.
The defendant IN h, answer declares that the
offences charged In the complaint have been COndOn"d.
lie charges his wife with uufaithfulnrss with John
X. Hatch during the years 1892 to lees at hi, own
house and the yachts Fauitl and Fdrnicntc amt
at various hotels and other places lie also makes
the same chargcs against Charlie T.. Wang formerly
"A clerk In dry goods store n brooklyn now clerk
In the store Of Wilcox q Hail. at New Haven Conn.
at No. % Hanson Place. where he and hi, wife and
Nr. Walling boarded during the spring and summer
Of 1850 and lo-G, and at hotel In BrOoklyn. and
against Covert D. Bennett alias DE BevOisc twice
found guilty Of killing New Jersey policeman named
Smith. but acquitted al the third trial. nfaithfnl.
ness j. also charged with Julius Kuschc a butcher Of
New Rochelle.
All the named co-resp ondcntS with Mrs.
Harrison declare thcm,clvc, innocent but have taken
no steps 10 defend themselves. H. II. Chttcndcn oi
No. lJJ broadway j, counsel for Mrs Harrison and
f.. b. Rarnum. of No. 10 Nassaust.. has Mr. lIarri.
sons case.