The Vermont watchman. [volume] (Montpelier, Vt.) 1883-1911, 1890-10-22

- ~, -
CONSPIRACY CASE E-lhe Jury on Wednes-
uay announced Vhey were agreed as
10 some Oh ihe respondents anu not
agreed az 10 others' Inc court seht them
pack again 10 RECONSIDER 'he case as 10 the
leSPohuen'S no! asIeeu upon. IN ~ 1huIS-
uay they came llto couIL m again Inc clerK
dSNeu the lolSHidu II ohe J'I nav aSIeen'
Foreman IewksDury answered: we nave
agreed upon some anu as 10 o,hers we are
sun unaDte 10 agree; Juuge Muhson
askeu; nave you any inquiries you 9eslre
10 inake Vi Ine couI!! vi course, III Is hot
proper lor you 10 lnulcate az 'nls tlme WhaI
tile [esults Vi your consuitdolous are; Ii
you nave any results as iar as you nave
gone, the maUterS are s!il 10 oe kept Wltnlh
your Own ,, IN knoWifuge. FOREMAN 1eWks-
Dury mere IS some ulsagreelnent IN re-
garu 10 tne testimony as TO What TOOK piace
az az une Welmore q Morse shop al tne tlne
Colonel Mcclure was Tequlreu 10 Joih' .nu
also !, we waht va III, the Wnole testllnohy OF MI
rearsons: Inc court lneh Suggesteu Ihat
counSel ior the suate anu me respohuehe
Ietlre WIN lne reporter 10 Che couuSeI
room anu agree as 10 Wnao parts OF the
.estilnony pore on tne natVer asked Ior
py Cne jury. ~ Su eqnSulla' ion IoiloWeu anu
, .a'l PAGES VI ntolulG !Gs'.lnony Were
@ tnen reau ~ lne Jury uy ene repot.er, as
Mas Mas !ne "ilole ". WI eaIHous eeulli.pnY.
me jury tnen letiLe" again 10 Iesu'ie tIeIr
a'lon " Vile oaae' -, wv M cIoch
y ehey were unaole .t ~ asreG, anu were asaln
ssnD 1 M oach uy 1n1 ooui = puu ,h9li te,uI1 m
tiiey acquitted Inree Oh tne respondents anu
uIHagIGeu IN Ihe case 0l Dyer MORRISON,
Morrlll anu sylvester, VINO VIII nave new
trlai az 'liG i neAt .erin Vi court ms case
occupieu une couIC zen U'Ss anu was lne
mos interesting lildl Vi the t"rlh; ~ was
Calieu we conSplrtcH GaSe' anu was uhe
nisD O., VI one hiiI % WI .ilT, Ia 'niS ooule'
STATE Ai rs; ,in GEokGh NEED LneS{'QnuehV
was cnarseu WIN sellIue uTInh Vi lntoAl-
caung Hq9oI 10 one JaiilTs H,ts. lleaton on 1Ile
| I"eIlth ol lasI ouly. iShess sWore ne
soo uI!hh M III tlle eEeulug Vi lne uay IN Iues-
Vlon @ III Uhe Sd'oon oI 'iIe r'Sl''hle"t, ihree
MnuesSeS no were pItSen. al 'h7 'lu9 '5
| SW"le t"a1 ItspohuGmmu 'tl'Seu w sell
lleaton auythlnhg. me Jury louhu
SeruIct Vi noI SulN' oeutei an l-a'nsoh lor
"V.chcc' plIoVo ~ s'I,c' ~ nj.
olAlN CS' LoR hN - iho" , l M uIS reNP'nu
ehl was chaiseu WIN oeihs lhtoAicaleu il
september laSl; some Ihree or iour Wiz
heSsts SWore tuat III '1elr 0pl'I1n' irpW
was uruuk on Ih9 occasion referred TO- one
witness uehneu tne cohulton Oh TeSpondent
as ihtoNiGateo' nut sal' ne wasn't
uluhh' heaponuthu iA'Io"uceu iWo
Witnesses WHO s"oTS ne was 9"oer anu ne
hllnsell SO SWore' Inc case was submitted
Wl."ul argument Judge hunsoh gave
the jury lHV cHdISe III cue nllH''te dh' l!,tr-
lteh Seconus' anu lheN IelHeI 70 tOhSlueI
'le CaSe; returning Nerulc' o' SUlIly' Lam
son lor ueltnuaht bl3oee lor S'a'e'
bAkNEf MING pleaueu Rull'y 10 ulsopey-
ing sunpWha ana was sentenced TO pay a
me OF 500 ana COSTS.
STATE VS. DENNIS DoNAHUE.-Ihe re-
Spohieht was Irled Tor an assault upon
Swede, named John Bagley, alleged 10 have
oeen commltted at Berlin on september Eth
iast' Bagley tolu IN broken English how
he hlred TO respondent Tor two days - Tor 70
cut grass lie worked few days and lls
employer directed MN 70 go anu eaten the
horse Ba9ley told INN he didn't 60 to
work to catch horse ana that thereupon
D9hahue struck HIM and Knocked him