The Anaconda standard. [volume] (Anaconda, Mont.) 1889-1970, 1890-05-18

announcing SahpDcli Us haI auu ~ PcV
jurer, since the gentleman from Penn.
sylvania constituted himself the sewer
through which this attack OF Campbelll
made its way into the record.
Cheadle, Of Indiana, made point OF
order, the language being out Of order.
The chair thought the word "sewer" in
this connection was hardly parliament
Bayne; | withdraw il then and say
''conduit pipe" have simply to say l
did the other day, knowing full well the
meaning Of the words and that l was NJ.
sponsible for them, denounce Campbell
as a liar and perjurer, and want to say
now that accept and am willing TO be-
lieve have as great confidence in the
character OF Campbell as / have in the
character Of the gentleman who makes
this attack upon me.
taken down, while Morgan ,Mississippil
stood In front of the chairman's desk and
urged that both letter and speech he
stricken from the record. He feared they
might lead to trouble outside OF the house.
Offensive words were taken down and re-
ported from the clerks desk. Cutcheon
moved the committee rise and report the
words to the house for action. This was
agreed to 40 to 70. The words having
been reported to the house, breckenridge
(Kentucky, made point OF order, there
was nothing i'm the report of the commit
tee to show there had been no intcrven-
ing business before their utterance and
report to the house. The speaker over
ruled the point of order on the ground he
must be governed by report made to him
py cnaIrIhaI Oh .ns coiii.'t'ee t a,.J mus ~
assume 'he co'i'n''ee ac'e" "'e"i"'S w
Breckenridge appealed.
On motion of Strublc of Iowa the APP
peai WAS ia'" oh ''e s'"ie' se'S i-'' mays
ioo:
Cutcheon then offered the foilowing;
lam n n%nm .'i in MA la,%aue ,,seJ hy him in com.
miitee Of iie whole, and taken down and re-
ported 10 the house and read at the clerk IS desk
| has been guilty Of violation of the rules and
privileges of the house ana merits the censnre Oh
the house ior tne s.iine .;,. \, ,...., l.. .....
,,.,,, =, n, @ S" ha hns ~ ,hs ser,.n"t noM
alarms. and there the censIre OF The ho,,sc be
administered by the speaker.
| Cutcheon demanded the previous ques-
| tion amid suggestions of a gag law"
| from the democratic side.
| Springer made a point of order that be-
| fore the resolution OF censure could be
| adopted the speaker must decide that the
language was unparliamentary.
| Cutcheon said he copied the resolution
| from the last resolution of the kind ever
| presented i'm the house. That resolution
was offered by Herbert and directed
against John Van Dornis of New York In
| the 47th congress. The resolution had
/ hppn acted tlDOn
| mis- made full apology TO the house and
| the gentleman attacked. If the gentle
man would make "A simple and manly re-
traction of his words, he lCutcheonl
would withdraw the demand for the pre-
| yio,ls question.
| Blount remarked that the language of
| the gentleman from New York was with
| out anv proyocation whatever.
| The speaker oycrrtiled the point of
| order
| Gronhalge of Massachusetts asked
| unanimous consent that Bynum be per-
| mitted TO make an exclamation, but Mar
\ tin of Indiana objected.
| Springer made a point of order that the
| lanouave used was not unparliamentary
| The sneaker oyerruled the point.
Springer appealed, and the appeal was
tabled. Yeas l2i. nays ~.
| Outhwaite moved an adjournment,
which was lost.
! Cutcheon demanded the yeas and nays
| on his demand for the previous question.
| and as he did so Springer rose with a
motion to refer the resolution To the COM
| The speaker, ignoring Springer's mo-
| tion. declared the yeas and nays ordered.
| Snriuver protcsted. saving the sneaker
had heard the motion and need not prc-
| tend that he had not.
McMilien called attention to the fact
| that the yeas and nays of the previous
question had not been ordered.
THE speaker tbereupon recognized
Sprinper, who moved 10 refer the resol,I.
lion to the committee ON rules with i'm.
structions 10 inuuire whether the Ian.
I,,s,e ,,sr,i nv Byn,,m WAS out of order.
and whether there was moi sufficient inst.
| ;tcatio,, fo, lis Isc
Henderson OF Iowa made n point of or.
dor AGAINST the motion and thc noint be.
inv cntcrtnined by thc sneakcr. Snriuucr
appealed. Tabled previous question or
bland moved TO reconsider.
Tho SNEAKER declined to rccoyuizc tho
mo,ion,
Snringor said the majority I'm adontinu
the resolution would set i, prcccdent whici
not redounded 10 lis benefits. The Ian
.,,,a,,. "a ,ho ,,,n,,on,, a from Jn,,;,n, ,,,