The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1889-03-15
CALENDAR
or Cases for the April Term, 1889, Of
the Supreme Court.


HAWAIIAN JURY.
The King VS.. Jim Crow. Selling
liquor. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT for the Crown;
Kaulukou for defendant.
The King VS.. Samuel Maikai. Per
verting justice. Attorney-General for
the Crown.
The King vs.. Kailiwai. Assault and
battery. Attorney General for the
Crown; Kane for defendant.
The King VS.. Sam Kalalau and Louisa
All Tim. Adultery. AttOrney-G
for the Crown; V. V. Ashford for de-
PENDANTS.
f. Kualii VS.. Kaneluaia. Ejectment.
Kane for plaintiff; Barenaba for de- !
PENDANT.
Manini ct al VS. Kaaihue ct al. Eject
meHt. Poepoe, Kaneakua for plaintiffs.
Naahelua VS.. Kalmana ct al. Eject !
ment. Rosa for plaintiff.
MIXED JURY.
Miriam Keau VS.. Antoine J. Lopez
Ejectment. Achi for plaintiff; Rosa for /
defendant.
Minister of Interior VS.. James Keau. /
Assumpsit. Attorney-General for the
Crown.
B. II. Kahananui vs.. V. V Ashford.
Grim. con. Rosa for plaintiff; Creighton
for defendant.
Frank Joliva VS.. J. L. Kaulukou. AS
sumpsit. Whiting for plaintiff; Rosa
for defendant.
John F. Bowler VS.. Ekalesia o Kau-
makapili. Whiting, Creighton for plain
tiff; Castle for defendant.
NJ. r. Colburn VS.. r. Gaylord. Tort.
Rosa, Whiting for plaintiff; V. V. Ash
ford, Creighton for defendant.
Kaahanui VS. c. Kingsley. Trespass.
Kaulukou for plaintiff; Peterson for de-
PENDANT.
Naaina VS.. Antoine Richard. Eject
ment. Achi for plaintiff; Brown for de-
PENDANT.
Edwin J. Hart VS.. Executors VIII of
H. J. Hart. Assumpsit. Monsarrat for
plaintiff.
John Scott ct al. VS.. E. NJ. Growing
burg ct al Assumpsit. Carter for
plaintiffs; Brown for defendants.
Executors will of H. J. Hart VS.. Hale
akala Hart. Assumpsit. Brown for
plaintiff; V. V. Ashford for defendant.
Trustees estate James @. Hayselden
VS.. Kekuewa. Ejectment. Hartwell
for plaintiff; Kane for defendant.
G. R. Keomaka VS.. II. B. Lohelani ct
al. Ejectment. Achi for plaintiff; Kane
for defendants.
Maria Coffin Apai ct al. VS.. Naholo-
waa ct al. Ejectment. Rosa for plain
tiffs.
FOREIGN JURY.
The King VS.. Fred. Blackburn. Fast
driving. Attorney General for the Crown;
Neumann for defendant.
The King VS.. P. Mcdonald. Fast drIv-
ing. AttOrneyGeneral for the Crown /;
Kaulukou for defendant.
The King vs. Lau Niu. Possession of
- 60. fll
Y. V. Ashford for defendant.
The King vs.. Capt. H. G. Houdlette.
Violating immigration laws. Attorney
General for the Crown; Neumann for
defendant.
The King VS.. J. r. Robertson. As
sault with dangerous weapon. Attorney
General for the Crown; Neumann, V.
V. Ashford, Wilder for defendant.
The King VS.. Choy Tung Sung. Pos
| session of opium. Attorney-General for
the Crown; Castle for defendant.
The King VS.. Ho Hee. Possession OF
opium. Attorney-Generalf for the Grown /;
Kaulukou for defendant.
The King VS. All Lin. Opium in pos
session. Acknowledgement for the Crown.
The King VS.. All Kea. Possession of
,,,:.-.-- A44@-rloy- <=+sIIGsrIII TIE crown.
The King VS.. George Hons. Disorder
ly house. Acknowledgement for the
Crown; Neumann for defendant.
The King VS.. Julia de Souza. DIsor-
derby house. Attorney-General for the
Crown.
E. Barry VS.. L. McCully. Assumpsit.
Rosa for plaintiff: Peterson for defend
| ant.
Crawford & Co. VS.. R. Briggs ct al.
Assumpsit Magoon for plaintiff; Smith
for defendant.
G. W. Macfarlane VS.. ]. S. McCand-
less ct al. Assumpsit. Ashford q Ashford
for defendant.
Peacock & Co. VS.. Bento d'Aubren.
Assumpsit. Whiting for plaintiffs; Ash
ford & Ashford for defendant.
Assignee Bankrupt Estate Of A. X.
Pelekaluhi VS.. w. G. Peacock. Trover
Brown for plaintiff; Whiting for defend
ant.
Wong Yau vs.. Wong Wa Hoy. AS
sumpsit Castle for plaintiff; Whiting
for defendant.
All Hoy vs.. William Larsen. Case.
Magoon for plaintiff; Attorney-General
for defendant.
John f. Bowler VS.. Hawaiian Govern
ment Assumpsit. Hartwell and Whit
ing for plaintiff; Attorney-General for
defendant.
Administrator Estate of Wong Kim vs..
Hawaiian Government. Assumpsit.
Castle for plaintiff; Acknowledgement for
defendant.
K. More ct al VS.. Hawaiian Govern
ment. Assumpsit. Neumann for plain
tiffs; Attorney. General for defendant.
Palmer & Ray vs.. Pacific Commercial
Advertiser. Assumpsit. Creighton for
plaintiff; Neumann for defendant.
Assignee Bankrupt Estate w. II.
Graenhalgh VS.. L. J. Levey. Replevin.
Ashford & Ashford, Creighton for plain
tiff; Neumann for defendant.
James Love VS.. A. Sing, eft al. As
sumpsit. Monsarrat for plaintiff.
L. Ahlo VS.. Amin, ct al. Assumpsit.
Castle for plaintiff; V. V. Ashford for
defendant.
FL. Hills VS.. J. E. Brown. Assump-
sit. Brown for plaintiff; Neumann for
defendant.
S. Skinner & Co. VS.. Tax Collector,
Honolulu. Neumann for plaintiff; At
torney- General for defendant.
Hawaiian Government VS.. Z. B.
Thomas. Assumpsit. Acknowledgement
for plaintiff.
Bishop & Co. VS.. G. w. Willfong. As
sumpsit. Smith for plaintiff.
Gaspar Sylvia VS.. Administrator with
will annexed Estate z. Y. Squires. As
sumpsit. Hartweu for plaintiff; defend