The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1889-09-19

Forger white Tosnd Guilty
Amer Long Deliberation.


TIE turf IN the white forgery case re-
sssnes ver.ses % xzzltF ~ charged n
sse snefetrsas. yesterday afternoon. has-
ing he-o czs svgnry-fwc ho1rs
Tzs yury, "a vxz stated yesterday Engn-
sn~. was rs:ser favnrassss 20 segastfal when
It zrsx xsns osi 70 dslsberats, AID a.
c'eiock &c tie Hassninx . ballot Vas takes
xnseh s-oo4 sgvsn fcr scauitssl snd eve
s8e convietson- Al as.h-esk TIE slfEaszoc
rsnaiaed unchanged. bat ~ - o'csoek one
Isrer essae 20 rse eouel.ssoz thar White
va guilty TIE Jurors fssa sat around
AID !cokes a. each other for a. hCgr o. 20
wtkn1ms saxing ballot. Al rgca lie fore
nan Reported 10 the eoasr that TIE iary
bal failed e. sxrve and that - would ike
- sar1E IN. The ef-oraess for TIC defend
sas conld nSt be fsssG1 ~ tsst tir1e- how
ever 40 the isEsy wss not bryzghf Ia The
fselge nsexs then eet ~ Eark talking over
The caSs a-sfz ~ exsErsze1 the exalcsts- A.
/ s'esoek aAi oS w&s taken which stood
fen for eonstetzon 80 EEo f9s AcsEsTt&l. Al
30 Ja6xs Hanfoss sent tor the lsry 20
ops IL ksas there Wss a delay Of several
moment TO tae &C, q. .a2asg Ensl ballot
isis yoxs resulted IN ali twelve jurors de-
elarfng fhe defendants guilt They hastily
stxussl tne verdict zad aied tlto court q,
twenty raInatss 90 Z
Theeongf had ssys been ayp-!sed Of The
ayreeEnent and neither Bal whisa- who
sat In eourf all ss2T wafftBg for sse verdict
Everybody supposed that The taFy had dis
agreed. and there vas gcaeFai expression
Of surprise when FOR man Powers In reply
to tae tsffgSt.fsn ri th@ eJzzrt. .Geotseusa
Of tee fury. have ycss szrgef upon ver-
diet" said, I've hare, ycur honor.
white Sas a. Pale A. sheet. and MS
~ Al
bat when Indzs Hanfgri read the verdict
and the words Guilty o. charged in the
IGliefsaeus" fell upon his ears, he coiorec
ncaFiv sgariet ami bis trembling HANGS
ssgEsht his face a. II - hide his agitafioD.
Attorney Lewis a. once assed Tor arrest OF
Judgment and fied a.rnctiopfor a new trial.
this BsogGon viii ~ arxasa October 3. ii
the new trial Is Tot granted an appeal will
D. taken.
TIE fo-ger's mother. who disappears.
s'I8de3Iy ard myg.ersously from Sheriff
Meffrsws residence a few days ago, reap
peaFed yesterday afternoon aud asked al
The laii 20 see her "Hiisie" Where Mrs-
While was during tue trial is unknown 10
the sheriff. bat she could nOs have teen
ont Of the city.
The trial OF Charles Clark and James
Davis for assault With intent to- murder
JaileT Pat Fsrrsher was concluded in the
district court yesterday afternoon. The
}afs Ns1 HSi osftf toSk SltuH-u ~ tshc osit
ballot and write the words, "Ggiigy a.
ebaFgel In tie Indictment" upon The yer
Gsct. Clark and Dsyis expressed 10 sur
prise or oTn9iion waen the verdict was
read. being igliy aware that there Was no
hope Tor th.ra-
The trial % Perry and Atkins. jointly in
dicfeG with BgaEbsn for receiving stolen
good, knowing them 10 be stolen. was
commenced Ia the afternoon. Brsnhau
has forfeited his bonds aud cannot be
found. Perry and Atkiss demanded sepa-
rsie trials. ~ jury was called 10 try Perry.
His tofDeY al this point raised points o:
law touching the validity Of the indict-
nent AID the hearing Of evidence was con
tlnasd 10 toaay.
Judge Hsnfofd viii call the civil docke,
this Doruiag, and will set cases for trial
Yesterday afternoon the judge-9ho, by
the way. hardly ever SHOWS any trace oi
humor while GA the bench -remarked that
be WAS clearing up the docket for the ben
eft OF Judges Echtenbs TX aud stratton.
Thomas Actowley. who vas appointed
receiver OF the business affairs of Hanne
man * Armstrong, butchers, about a week
aso, was yesterday removed aud the prop
erfy WIS paced In the hands OF Charlie.
W. Hanneman, deferdenl in the seton
uader which the receiver was appointed
subject to the ofeer of the court.
A hearing wss given in the afternoon or
the application Of the bondholters snf
their trustees. Dexter Horton & Co. bank
sfs. for the discharge of n Jackson a. re
eeiyeg 81 the seattle Con, truciioD Com
many. The court denied the motion Il
dissolve the order appointing the receiver
Ter the reason that The mortgage egains
the company Can be foreesosed, noiwith
standing the property Is In the hands 0i |
receiver.