Wichita eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1886-1890, 1889-11-07
THE COURTS.
DISTRICT COURT.

DISTRICT COURT.
Judge Reed set the following cases yes
terday: State VS. James Buns, nolled;
state vs. Maggie Puschbacher, nolled; state
VS. w. S, Deeds, nolled; state vs. E. II.
Cuditor. set for Friday; state VS. Ed Stan
ley, ct al, Friday: state VS. T. b. Nichols,
Saturday: state VS. Stiles Maxwell, Satur-
day; state VS. Maggie Pushbacher, Satur-
day; state vs. E. Watkins, Saturday; state
VS. Jane III. Butler, Saturday: city vs. james
Barnes, nolled; A. Weir Us JOcelyn q
Vineyard set for Monday; &. ID. Robert
son VS. Mary c. Todd, Monday; Jno. j.
Hughes VS. Chamberlain. ct al, continued
as to both cases: Jno. j. Hughes VS. Isabel
South. set for Monday; d. Hays VS. ). w.
Butler, Monday both cases; d. Hays VS. L.
Cornell, Monday both cases; Sallie g. Bull
let VS. Augustus Knight, continued Tor
term; W. C. Cook VS. w. Fl. Ebey. dis
missed at cost Of plaintiff: W. b. Throck-
morton VS. St. Louis & San Francisco
Railway company, continued. h.
W. Packer VS. Chicago Lumber COM
pany, dismissed at cost OF plaintiff;
~. Stewart vs. Ellen Biggs, dismissed at
cost OF plaintiff: S. T. Jones VS.. Il. Jewett,
set for Monday; Davidson & Throckmor-
ton rs John Lebrand ct al. set.'for Monday;
Rodkins s. Bell vs. kans Construction and
improvement company, set for Monday;
G. A. Keiservs. j. B. Dougherty, set for
Monday; Z. w. Wilhete VS. j. NJ McCor
mick, settled at cost of plaintiff; Samuel
Goldstein VS. Frank Murphy, continued
for service; ID. Hays vs. Westina Cornell,
cor sinued for service; National Loan and
Trust company VS. J. W. Cooper ct al: set
Off Tuesday; George c. Strong VS. David
Asoueth. set for Tuesday; Thomas T.
Wilson VS. A. I'll. Proctor, set for Tuesday;
Chicago Lumber company VS. j. w. VOL
stein, set for Tuesday; Chicago Lumber
company vs. S. z. Carman, Tuesday; Alex
Steele and Co. VS. w. jackson, Tuesday;
A. A. Mckee VS. Wichita & Western rail
way company, set for 18th; Andrew Klaus
Us George S. Turner, 18th; Rank Manufac-
turing company vs. J, A. Wallace 18th: H.
Reunie VS. 5. c. Haynes, l4th: II. Rennle
VS. Margaret Steadman, 14th; A. X. Musel-
Ter VS. + Burt, 14th; John Harrison vs.
John Scott. 14th ID. Hays VS. Butler q
Collins. continued for service; Richardson
Drug Company VS. James f. Irwin: contin-
ued for service: James L. Lombard VS. >.
X. Moore ct AL, 18th.
J. A. Sohn VS. NJ. Day, continued for ser
vice: Chas. Wilson VS. W. W. Hays, 18th:
Louis Steinbechs VS. Nettie f. Garrison,
18th; Butler g. Fisher VS. A. c. Jones, con-
tinued for service: Butler & Fisher VS. +.
S. Wright, continued for service; A. A.
Richards VS. j. Il. Woods, Alex Steele g.
Son VS.. NJ. b. Altman, both for 18th; A. j.
Mckenzie VS. c. A. Rock, T. A. Berry VS.
Kelly, J. s. Hilton VS. Ii Steward, Packard
& Wilson VS. J. Hubbard, all for 18th; NJ.
Suddeth VS. w. G. Dacey, three cases set
for 18th.
In Backtel vs. S ". Ford. plaintiff
granted leave to amend petition.
In Citizens Bank VS. the St. Louis Pro-
gressive Fancy Grocery Co. judgment was
rendered VS. Eva J. Beach for $500.
PROBATE COURT.
Yesterday was a pretty good Gay for
marriages in the probate court. Licenses
were issued to VIM. H. Schauner and
Christina Landsidel, both of Wichita; to
j. C. Watkins aud Alice Evans, both of
Cheney: to Gottlab J. Rombolt and Freda
c. Sohauner both of Wichita; to
w. b. Huff. of Clearwater. and
Emma f. Mccoy, Of Gainesville; to
J. a. Runspear and Carrie D. Holdings
worth both of Wichita; and Delos A. Pei
ton and Ada Watts both of Wichita.
I. II. Cornwall applied for druggist per-
NIT and hearing set for Dec. 10.
POLICE COURT.
Twelve of the girls paid 80 each into the
city treasury yesterday and several back
fines were collected. Newton Payne charg-
ed with being connected with the abandon |
ing of the colored child on Oak street re-
Gently proved that he WAS elsewhere at the |
time and was released.