Wichita eagle., 1889-11-21
THE COURTS.
DISTRICT COURT.


N. A. English VS. H. NJ. Davis, dismissed
without prejudice at cost OF plaintiff.
| Daniel Sherwood VS. Alfred Chandler.
judgment for plaintiff for 81 $50. "a with IL
per cent from date foreclosure as to all de-
PENDANTS
j. E. Fowler VS. John Watts, dismissed
without prejudice cost plaintiff.
Kansas Construction and Improvement
company VS. Smith Bracey, dismissed at
cost of plaintiff.
Joe Rich VS. G. F. Inversion, Judgment in
rem for plaintiff for s674.2O and u per cent.
interest from date foreclosure.
John Kimmerle VS.. Chest Geager, judg-
ment for plaintiff for S225i.60 with u per
cent. interest.
Berry Kelch VS. George Wade, dismissed
without prejudice at cost of plaintiff
John R. Parsons VS. Z. NJ. and E. H De-
wore, judgment for plaintiff for g, 1s0 80 as
to all defendants with 10 per cent
First National bank of Kiowa VS. A. H.
Post; judgment for plaintiff for Sl714 and
IL per cent.
D. B. Herman VS. H Lynch; Judgment
interest.
NJ R Moser VS. R f Coates: Judgment for
plaintiff.
H. F. Donnelly VS. A. L. Pierce; judg-
ment for plaintiff for 81, 500 90 with 12 per
cent,
NJ. A Burrell VS. G.. Rawlins; judgment
for plaintiff for 1881 Sc with II per cent.
Jas. L. Mead VS. VIM. Barr; judgment for
plaintiff for s2O9 - with II per cent.
J. L. Mead VS. c. A. Mathews; Judgment
for plaintiff for S34T.1 Is with 10 per cent in
terest as to all defendants.
j. B. York VS. NJ. A Schattner; Judgment
for plaintiff for Sc. g.! % with per cent.
Citizens Land Co. VS.. D. c. McKennon;
judgment for plaintiff for S1,3S6 with 10
per cent.
Dean 6, Stewar. VS. L. e. DEAN: dis
missed at cost of plaintiff.
Farmers Loan and Trust Co. VS. B. G.
Green; judgment for plaintiff for SOL IS; VS.
Green, and on cross petition VS. same de-
PENDANTS for SlS2 "a with IL per cent.
Kansas Loan and Trust Co. VS. s. c.
Tracey judgment for plaintiff for 1916. 10
with II per cent interest.
P. Z. Brown VS. J. B. Priddy judgment
for So, $50 10 with ~ per cent.
w. F. Leonard VS. B. Wilkerson judg-
ment for plaintiff in rem VS. L. w. Clapp.
J. l.. Mead vs. E. C. Naffsinger Judgment
for plaintiff for sl24.75 with II per cent.
Samuel Goldstein VS. f. Wilkes judg-
ment for s763 80 as to all defendants.
Hobbs VS. Beard was on trial by the
court.
The injunction by the Wichita City
Railway Co. restraining the Riverside and
Suburban railway from interfering with
the former company's track on South
Market was argued by Judge Sluss repre-
senting the Riverside and Mr.. Vermillion
contra.
PROBATE COURT.
A marriage license was issued in the
probate court to Henry Craver and Pearl
Pastures
Rowsev VS. Burleigh estate set for No
vember % at 10 a. N.
Contract of Burleigh heirs on division of
rents filed.
COMMON PLEAS.
In Montgomery VS. Cone verdict of 500
for the plaintiff was rendered.
James Slatterly VS. Wichita & Western
railway was transferred to the district
court.
Ada R. Oliver VS. the Fort Scott, Wichita
& Western railway is still in hearing be-
fore Judge Balderston.
A number of whisky cases filed COM
pleted the business of the court.
POLICE COURT.
The police docket shows the arrest of G.
Davis and c. F. Elder, on state warrants,
charged with keeping nuisance, or joint.
A back fine completed the days work IN
this court.