The Arizona sentinel. [volume] (Arizona City [Yuma], Yuma County, A.T. [Ariz.]) 1872-1911, 1889-04-06
LAW ADMINISTRATION.
A Glimpse at Some of the Peculiar I
situations of Colonial Life.

A Glimpse at Some of the Peculiar In
situations of Colonial Life.
The sentiment against lawyers was
at this time nearly as strong in Vir-
ginia as in New England, although in
the former it had sprung more from
experience than from doctrine. Epis-
copacy, unlike indepenlency, was not
hostile in spirit to the legal profess
sion. But Virginia, it would seem, was
a prey to band of unscrupulous,
broken-down attorneys from England; !;
and the extent of the affiction appears
from the legislation on their account.
In 1643 an attempt was made to reg
ulate the practice of law by system
of fees, licenses and oaGhs, but without
avail; and two years later it was en-
acted that 'mercenaiy attorneys be
wholly expelled from such Office" AS
in New England, the expedient was
adopted of allowing a magistrate or
some one from among the people to as
sist parties in pleading causes. This
plan, however, was soon found un-
satisfactory, and a second attempt was
made to regulate, rather than exclude,
the practice of law, but, as before, with
out avail. In 1858 all persons, attor-
neys or others, who should assist in
pleading causes for a compensation
were made liable to fine of five thou
sand pounds of tobacco
Fortunately, these worthless adven-
turers confined their attention to Vir-
ginia. The middle cobnies, at this
time, were not subjected to such visit
alton. In an account of Pennsylvania
and West New Jerse!, by Gabriel
Thomas, published in 169S, and dedi-
Gated to Friend William Penn, ;" is the
following naive observation: "Of
Lawyers and Physicians shall say
nothing, because this country is very
peaceable and healthy; long may it so
continue, and never have occasion for
the tongue of the one nor the pen of
the other, both equally destructive to
mems estates and lives" Against the
attorneys, the lawgivers, apparently,
deemed some special precaution neces-
sary; for the Fundamental Constitu-
tions of East New Jersey provided that
all parties might plead their causes
either in person or by friends, no COM
pensation being allowed.
With this practical exclusion from
the colonies of men educated and de-
voted to the law, there was of course
much crudeness in the early judicial
systems. From devotion to particular
religious theories, or from the ten
dency in new communities toward CEN
-tralized government, the colonists dis
regarded an important English prece-
dent-the separation of the Judiciary
from the executive and the legislature.
The highest court was, identical. in
Massachusetts, with the Legislature,
and, in the other colonies, generally
with the executive. The very men
that sat on the bench sat also in the
executive council and in the legisla-
ture. AS result, the distinctions be-
tween law, morality and religion were
constantly overlooked. Not merely
mans relations to his fellows, but even
his relations to his God, were placed
within the province of the Legislature
and the courts. To take striking ex-
ample, blasphemy and idolatry were
capital crimes at the same time in
Massachusetts, and in Maryland. In
Virginia. one neglecting the daily serv-
ice of the Established Church might
find himself sentenced to the galleys
for six months. If he did not attend
the Sunday service, he might need to
prepare for the next world.
The men who presided over these
early tribunals were as much product
of the times as were the laws they ap-
piled or the justice they dispensed.
Legal training was, indeed, rare quail
ity. But usually they were liable and
judiciOus persons, according to the
requirement of the Virginia statute.
They came chiefly from the ruling
class-the Independent oligarchy in
New England, the gentry or planter
class in the South. Their deficiencies
and eccentricities were overlooked by
the people. The judgments of John
Winthrop, the Puritan Governor of
Massachusetts, and of Thomas Olive,
the Quaker Governor of West Jersey,
were equally acceptable, though deliv-
cred in the one case from the platform
of the Boston meeting-houSe, and in
the other from 1.-The stumps in his
meadow" 1t was reason and common
sense, not legal precedents, that the
judges consulted, considering each case
as of novel occurrence. When these
simple expedients did not suffice-in
cases of doubt or of other perplexity-
application was made, at least in New
England, to the ministers. s.-Frank Gay
lord Cook, in Atlantic.
A Novel Bridge Test.