St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1889-12-01

said the horse was driven by Smith. He
told Oman to say nothing about the
hiring OF the white horse, because it
MIGHT GET HIM INTO TROUBLE.
and later Coughlin told Capt. Setback
that he saw Smith after May 4, but did
not bring him in, despite the fact
that he had been orderd TO do
So" ''Where is Smith," the states
attorney cried, with a sweep
ing gesture, ''away with him."
Next we have Burke fleeing TO
Europe with tickets and money in his
pocket, and, when caught in Winnipeg,
making hard fight, an expensive fight,
against coming back. Why did he so
fight, if his tenancy in the cottage we're
incorrect? Because Martin Burke dealt
the blow that killed the doctor. When
you come to consider the verdict, think
of May 4 think of that man gathering
his little valise and his Instruments;
think of him clasping to his bosom the
cotton with which to relieve the suffer
ing Of the wounded; think of the splits
in the box; think of his rushing out to
the buggy; think of the crowded seat;
think of him rushing north to relieve
the suffering man; think of him in the
cottage, and when you think of him
there, may there reyerbrate through
your ears the death cries of this man,
who. in his last moments, called upon
HIS GOD AND HIS JESUS
tSenSatiOnl; think Of those men who,
without giving him time to pronounce
the other trinity name, felled him to the
the wounds IN his head; think of the
grave in which he was placed; think of
all this in making up your verdict, and
in the end there will be such verdict
as when his honor prOnounces his judg-
ment upon it, that he, having his heart
and eye to God. may say, May the
Lord have mercy on your SOuls.'',
Judge Wing then addressed the jury on
behalf of the defense. He began with
Dan COughlin'S defense. He began by
stating the vast amount and the numeI-
Gus kinds of evidence produced in the
case and all of it circumstantial. He
explained the different light in which
such evidence must be cOnSid-
cred from that accorded to di-
rect evidence. A mass of mere
as proof, but each circumstance must be
told the jury of the celebrated DR.. Hull
case in New York. citing the sharply in
eliminating circumstances which point
ed to DIR. Hull as the murderer Of his
wife. Yet negro murdered her for
robbery. The circumstances, he said,
must have known and visible connec-
ton with the crime. He said: ''If
was on trial for my life, no juror who
values his future peace of mind dare
use against me the fact that in the
neighborhood of the homicide, some
hours before, or some days after, un-
known men were seen. A juror that
would do that violates his oath, because
there is no known and visible
CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TWO.
AFTER that question is settled, that
there is connection between the cir
cumStanceS and the fact that you are
looking into and trying TO find out, with
out doubt, then you are to still inquire
If that circumstance may not be true
and yet the man lie innocent. That is
the great test" Judge Wing then
dwelt upon the necessity that the jurors
should put aside their natural prejudice
against these men on account of their
nationality and religion, and remember
that it was natural for them to love the
home of their birth. The court then
adjourned till Monday.