The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1889-12-12
COUNTING THE COST.
What the City Will Pay for
the Replat.
sfpoRT or The CITY ATToRnsy
80 fetal Cost % street. widening VIII
xss Exeesd sz9s.ro7.7o.
o4fser Damages Asked.

:. .srrt6snec vita snstrneescns given him hy
= aaetl. City Ats04aey AIbsFtson has pre-
- statement. complied fron she rseoFas
z = superior eoust. showing tbs s.atns o.
aSmsersi street condemnation yroee@ainez 70
80 = CITY hes been psfgg daEing his term
: a. ard sinez the nre The Fspor Is -
~kx.nes - s0ii wx.
~wIa - sen th&: ugder orsfnanee 80. ifx5.
:. a. establishment Of h&1ssoed avenue. 10
s..z.exs uegs awsr9sd By TIE appraiser. TBS
49, a. tsenf4 5ass from tie ailng q the r.
- .fsaese b de chaFfef Tor the aisnz Of gb-
$3.50 sh~Eefo. eaagssd soEse weeks ago, ard
{. = ssresse claim kss baen aled IL the pFeSz-
- Is fsgfssr steps reuziE % b. taken ~ tae
- ap1es the sfssiDaaee-
o. naEter 81 ordinance so. f,ise. for ms
- llshsag a West street. the rec I'd shows
- ~ asraszes weFe allowed By the appraisers,
- al sone bEve been claimed, except IN she
-, a gha-sez Hopkins who ssks for damages
y ~. sssrn Of 1904 Unless he KhOald be a.
sessa szaaxes Is . Jary. no assessment viii be
~set.ks for he 0Fenfng Of the street. AID no
.s.s,ssnsas esn be made 10 aHg event untft alter
- ssnsroye1y has been settled ~ Ju1sEaal
stees inFs.
kan o;hes cases OF street cofdezsnationss
$500 have hesu awarded by The appraisers
= - nsrs;ss and IN the amounts EaeniEoaed ln
- .zssxed szssnpl iatioa. IL tbe uaAstrr of or
Ssessse Nc. LIS. Tor layiag % aud estab Wishing
sutfse ssRase, ordinance Ssa lfo8. for the
~sasminw es Commercial strEes. alid ordinance
lilo fex extending south Third street.
= dsmsses have been olslused ia 81
ktnea Is whaf was aasFsed By The appfaisers-
- tlsae he vlng passsd for the aiiug OF tiriasr
eEame. there - no occasion fsF farther delay -
ss.kla< ne assessments provided for By the
essral orasnSnces Ia al Of these esses tho
49, Il ne eaty ha4 been made the assessment
6sslsast II nas oEIy rsTaslns feg the souneii 70
zamnate kse f0tas eosts involved IN these pro-
ssealnxs ARD leTy assessments 10 defFa9 tie
ssrae npsss tie vainss ioGnd By the APPRAISERS
- method a procedure in tltis direction Il
rfesidsd b. ghese ordinances, 20 which beg 20
seles e. 70 aetsiis
gn tie matter % ordinance No. Lfe9 for the
xtdsntnx on souFi Second street. ordinances NO.
To ior aldenlnE 81 eeeoBd street aud ordinance
Is Lie lsr shs widening OF Front street. ex.
ssgssoas hare teen GIed b. sandry property
eap<fs a. st forth Ia the annexed statenefs&
nsesy pasty 10 these proceedings has right 20
Isry trial ami IL viii bs impossible 70 seer
sasn tha totA aEnGunts 10 be ra1sed By eESesss
SENS unfil this litigation 4 settled. The prep
err ewnefs she have accepted the awards
msde ay the appraisers should receive their
compensation without awaiting the uncertain
serrsiaatson Of salts at las. ! sce no reason
phy "a assessment should not nnw Re made to
sas.siy he cl.irns admified 20 be just when
nv damage claims now fu dispute are fully
ni4eased saoshes assessment may be levied 70
nse1s aach further demands a. mag be allowed.
weuia recon- mend that the matter Of these
assessments b. referred 70 a COMMITTEES for the
pasposs Of rvpofssag she exact amounts 20 be
slsea b ssssssments with such other recon-
meaa3fians A. may be proper.
soutH aEeoxp stgggT.
IN the report Of Tho ePpfa isess. Fred 6aseh,
william a. Hughes Ana J. II. Me0raw, aicd
0siobcr II. 1sss, fof widening and establishing
ssnsA ascund street. damages were awarded as
faI5auK.