New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1889-05-19

her that ugly old women" ne Then CAREY 49, vo,ls
SThen Why, the don't you answer men me vour
dd think TsqGE,sd az as ssIsn9 carving knife
to- we were at dinner, and he had told the setVS'
leave the room n ne af f6a ' Whenever do you
the dS,sas yGG It SgS Ss yG an arr shout
rS iaa TOr iIe then dropped the knife and spTnslng
mon me made his great teeth meet IN my check ana
III blood spued over ne The agony W. c so spd pes
entity Ctrssou the cook seized him oy ne collar g%s
be broke from him and Snwn P Sec 3er hts
sas n rye Exploit Ep he had taken himself of 70 Rich
inSncd 70, his sakeiur cordially desped him-out
for that Of my then baby children; a,.S scIre Rod
found every word IN THIS pe6O Og sPpnry,hns M and
going abroad. He had been boating SDoI 1 me
Thames. amusing himself. ard was IN lreSS tut 'i'
purchase OF Lady DysaT's villa
There is internal evidence that this was written
after the final separation for II Lady LSuon ooruay
dcspsed7 her husband at the time OF the "naso upo"
her. she certainly took strange ways OF showing 'uo
nature Of her sentiments. The relations between
them after this, and until 1896, when bul"e' MN
self insisted upon the separation, WERE so Jar 'no
letters indicate, replaced npon the Old nOuns oi
intimate affection. Even tho playful puppy lAiA Is
resumed In these last two years and when ~ Ionstn
Bulwer declares his docru inaiIon not 10 i've W'tn
her again It IS she who combaS this resolve with all
her powers OF persuasion, and who expresses hcr
entire willingness to return to him. MS oc'erh',-
nation to separate from her cusucd upon mani
fostaton OF jealousy her part, which took shaPo
in sudden night visit 70 his chambers az the AIoanJ
n visit whica breL muth scandal, though thofo 10
M evidence that her suspicious wero connTmcd IN
her fnal letter 20 him she expresses me hope uSi
his friends may have none OF the irrttabihV Of
tcmper and easily wounded feelings, which, IN me-
dcstroycd and cancelled all my best Intentions ana
This may perhaps be regarded as an admission mat
all tho faults were not on one side That L~y
Iytton had n high temper horSef her subsequent
career proved fully for any doubt to eSst on n"'
roin. Whatever her wrongs, she did not bear them
patiently, nor did she lorg maintain the atn'uae
q, forgiveness I'm which she passes OF the stase 80
far as these letters arc concerned HOT 6'sn'h'N.
friend Miss Dewey, observes that no one can o'ionu
some OF her published eNtravagances,' ana WI"
Miss Dewey mildly terms "eNtravaganccs ">S
,ar,al critics have considered reckless and frantic
Ibcls ard calrmnlcs, in which she included NOT Only
her former husband but all Of his relatives ana many
>, 81. friends IL may be, as Miss Dewey intmatcS'
that oven for these llbels "onr blame bhouIh moro
Justly DO laid on those who abused her hIBhS SCI"
su,vc nature and indurcl those feelings OF eNa>P'r
zion under tho inhction OF wrong which she han
M other opportunity 10 cxprcss' ont a. inc Sa"''
time. It cannot be forgotten that Bn!"er compa'"o"
=, hor ahusc Of all his family as having become an
established habit a year before the outrage.
n, ro,rSc his behavior to her was most brutal ana
infamous and Whatever allowances We may HlaAc i''
tho curse Of an Inherited violent temper We must con
hat
Tor which under any comedy ablo rroNoeaon eona ue
a 10 ,ho ncrretra.ion Of so gross and Wild boast
inn m act In thinking % THIS maniAch outbreak
Tcnnvsou's raIstic lines on The New T'non' lne'
uably rrcur IN tho mind:
"Du, you sir you arc harm TO rIcse'
You n"vcr look but hhi content
Nor like gentleman at cas-,
with moral hrradih ot temperament
II Is lust THIS moral breadth Of temperament "h''h
p,lxrr ackr,l and tue defect Is responsible for many
,hlnRS IA his career, both public and private when
dcseryc 10 be called either petty or isno6s.
Tb.ro was A great deal Of anIActalty. Of mock
ssn,lbnlty, Of hard cgO'Ism, about him. poNoha
doubt III, genius rial, but NOT sVmpithet'
and probably he was entirely right when he SAID thai
he was "onIy A. TO i've a'oUc" Certainty ko'lh"
whnc,cr was not The kind Of woman 70 tane or r.
form him. and this the event proved " Is an "ES'
| miser rbin siory. but the poor womAn woo hEIc
In +, must have suffered far rorc fnpm III" dcprlVNon
Of her chidr-n than from N" oSS OF husband WIN
| whom ihe hsd pruved impossible 10 live Sh'
ga not IS Miss Dewey in'Ima'rS. die workout VIZ"
| ,orrpw That can hardy hc sa'd Of snV ono who
| live 10 he eighty Hut she IrInrrnd greatly
We must rcp,at In closing this rcriew that We can
mt soc tho iuslncata0n FOR tho vubirahoh OF '"o
letters which constitute nInr.tnuths OF this rolums'
! Tt.v 40 no, Tend 10 tho vinicaton Of tn" D""agor
,dy Lytton. They only cEP0S" Inri Lythn 'n''h'''
10 rdlcnIc which Is ari not OF jn'co b"' Of met
| r,,urr,,y As 10 TO concluding portion OF Inc DOOR
f., certainly docs prove that Lady iy''on was d'epN
vr1ngcd but II docs not bear our the sweeping s'''
! Civilizations % the Sdlior Miss Dewey franNy owns
mat she Is not an impartial "il'or, Slough tn" adihS
| - g., ,,,,,cJ scarcely necessary by the tone OF her
| rcrn.,,a She ha- done her best IN pun down INC
bu,rsnd AMI to build mp the vie. Sh" has proved
| hat the sormcr was capable Of great brutality upon
ccAor aud has laid open 80 far As she was aDlo IN"
mast secret rrcess"S Of HIS emotional life. We 40 not
mink thu spectacle improving. or particularly n'ers''
| , and We arc by no means sure that Lady Lyuons
ucnory stands vIndlratcd7 IN such = way A. TO con
oro ,he wisdom OF the method smrloyed 10 thai end