The Sedalia weekly bazoo. [volume] (Sedalia, Mo.) 187?-1904, 1889-10-15
note given by Franklin bearing date Nay,

contract how he fed the cattle etc.
The case will probably take the balance
OF to-day and oil OF tomorrow. G. W.
Barnett and Henry Lsmm attorneys for
the plaintiff and John Montgomery Jr.,
attorney for the defendant.
The following entries we're made at the
opening Of court this morning after which
the case of Franklin VS. Newkirk was
taken up;
l George d. Lowery vs. Peter Scally, in
junction j. T Montgomery withdraws
from case as attorney for plaintiff
State ex rel P:lkington vs. T. B. Stephens,
appeal; Dismissed by plaintiff
Same vs. j. P. Harrington appeal /; dis
missed
In the matter of the incorporation of
Labor Exchange, application report Of
Henry Sinnett filed.
Satah Bradley VS.. Jack Farmer, de-
positions on part of defendant fled.
Mccormick & Co., VS.. g. ID. Calvert,
note struck FIR % docket.
| E j. Smith ys. Curtis Field, account
defendant files answer.
j. q. Rissler VS.. w. NJ. Moore ct al,
note defendant files answer. ,
Fred. Wilson vs.. q. E. Brown, account
| ueIen6ant nieS answer.
Rose6-ld VS.. Loyinger judgment for
plaintiff for $1,000.
THURSDAY.
| The attendance was small and il looks
as if tue people did not appreciate the
august tribunal that is now grinding out
Justice in the temple on the square.
| TEE following entries were made on the
opening of court;
John Zmmerch;ed VS.. Pacific railway,
garnishee Of Vim. NeighbOrs-dismissed
by plsintiff at his cost and gsrnishee dis
charg ed.
| Louis Deutsch vs.. Herman Klinke,
judgement for plaintiff, S47S at 10 per
cent interest.
Robert Bobque VS.. NJ. d. Reese, jr., on
note-jud. ment for plaintiff for S27O at
| per cent interest.
Mrs. Bette Gentry VS.. VI. y. Green;
sheriff has leave to amend return OF service
of summons; amendment made and judg-
meDt for plaintiff for S634.60 at 10 per
cent interest.
Gee. z. b. Jackson VS.. NJ. o. Green and
Henry Albers; judgment for plaintiff
Sl4 30 at 10 per cent interest.
| W. III. Powell VS.. John Baker ct al;
| judgment Tor plaintiff for y. 563.94 at 10
per cent interest.
Walker II. Wood VS.. J. III. Whitley,
note; judgment for plaintiff SlOl at 10
per cent interest.
A. z. Espenschied VS. j. E. Hills, note;
Judgment for the pIaintiff for $1,000 at 20
per cent interest.
Elizabeth Hubbard VS.. Phillip Schafier
ct al. Plaintiff enters her appearance and
valves notice OF appeal.
| Kate e. Powil VS.. Chas. Fl. Powell-di-
vorce. Plaintiff files motion for slimony,
pending the suit. The defendant files his
answer, and In that he SAYS that he is not
worth $4,000, as alleged by Kate G. Pow
ell, his wife. He winds up his answer as
follows:
"That the troubles of plaintiff and de-
| PENDANT have not been caused by habitual
drunkenness on his part, for that charge
against him is wholly untrue Ror were
they caused by conduct on his part which
rendered her position intolerable, as SET
forth liz the petition, for the allegations OF
| personal violence and abuse are also I'M
true but that while plaintiff has been fully
as much and even more to blame than he
| fyr all their domestic unhappiness, yet he
wishes to make no charges against his
wife, and is ready TO forget and forgive, he
still loves her, and desires that she return
| TO him and his duty and again re-unite his
family, so that by mutual forbearanee and
forgiveness his broken home may be re-
established"
Deborah Crawford VS.. w. d. Crawford,
divorce (; plaintiff files proof of publica-
ton.
j. S. Bonnell VS.. Agnes Hickman ct al
plaintiff files proof of publication.
w. A. Firth VS.. Priscilla Firth, divorce;
plaintiff files proof of publication.
Ledbetter rs. Ledbetter, divorce plain
tiff files proof of publication.
FRANKLIN VS.. NEwKIRK.
This case was proceeded with and a
great number OF witnesses were examined,
TO prove all about q steer-how he would
look when we'll fed and at what elevation
would be carry his tail when poorly fed
how he would low when hungry and how
he would low when be saw q load of corn
coming or what kind of low the brute
would give when he undertook to exhibit
his grief at the presence of q deceased
steer in the same lot The evidence In
the case was closed about ii o'clock to-day
and The attorneys spent nearly an hour |
getting their instructions ready.
At Has a, 10. the court took a recess |
until l:S0 p. m,
AFTERNOON SESSION.
The attorneys read the instructions OF
the court to the jury in the Frsnkiin-New-
kirk case, which We're very short, and the |
chances are that the jury understood them
much better than they would had they |
been long drawn out
The court allowed forty minutes to each |
side to convince the jury that each or both |
sides were the injured party, and Henry |
Lamm started OH for the plaintiff in a |
voice that made the windows rattle.
1t will be late to-day before the jury will |
render verdict, if they get one at all in |
this complicated case.