The Helena independent. [volume] (Helena, Mont.) 1875-1943, 1889-11-02
AGREED POSTPONEMENT.
The Decision On the Appeal In the
Tunnel Case to Be Made
Next Week.
Both Sides Want Time to Consult
Authorities Bearing On the
Question at Issue.
The Legislative Case In the same Position
as That Of McHatton--A Rumor
About Halls Course.


vening of court this morning at 10 O'Clock,
contrary TO expectation, no decision was
rendered in the matter affecting the right
of the respondents in the mandamus case to
appeal. Immediately after the reading OF
the minutes had been disposed of, the attor-
neys for the relator and respondents stated
.ha. ,ho,, aas;rad ,o discnss the onestions
Vua' '"eS "'''i'" -
which were involved more 'horoughly' anu
with the limited opportunity which they had
,ho,, ,r.ra unahla 10 investigate the oues
..-s-.s r,.
'iohs 10 theh s"''si"N'''"
stated that that WIS in accord with his own
views. and he would Withhold rendering his
.,a.;s;,,,, -, ,Lis ,ros,;on and vould de.
ueoislon up''i 'n'' su''','u, "nu .o'e
fer the consideration OF the matter until
such time ns the attorneys ON both sides
IA ,,or,r,I,l,, invastigated the matter
n"u 'noio"s"'s ''.s - s..,'1.,
Agreeably TO both phrties' the iulther coh-
sideration of the question was deferred un-
al nsxt "Wednesday morning. Judge De
- -. -. 4. A..
wore sta,eu th"1 " WIS oe'' w "ei'' '"o
matter until that time, as on Monday he
bod IN be in Missouln. and on Tuesday there
:, t,,or. h;,,, =,
was Il crlniliial ih"''ei oo''inH ''ioie M" "'
Deer Lodge. and il was best TO set this mat
Ter down for further argument ON Wednes-
-, ;, a.. 49,. :. ,,,,s ,,..,;,, A..
uay' oeo'"Ne =" nm ""' ~
be heard on thnt DAY.
Mr.. Campbell-The arrangement is agree
.,Lo a. no. Ian, of eourse III tho ;n,ar;u
-
there VIII oe stay %, pi"oeeulnes.
MT. loole-we VIII nor op!ect 10 IL.
ine ,oui. NouiI A.,.e a. " .vui'sei ,nn.
the matter aoou. Hhlen ,neie y ,l9 Rlea.es' s
uoup. III my liiiu, anu " .. wi.n p"is'.n- .,'
larry can ,he atteil,ion vi ateoinvss, u tne
question wne.ner 'ne ileinosis vi ,ais poaru
upon t,,e showing ih"ue aiiu 'ne niiuaNl' ol
ualep u. INile' u,,,; w m..ioh pe,ig eahen uy
,he po,iru, hiiu i "il"iii M saeh Ling aDrsn.'
nave tne ,len. 70 appeal iloiii 'nis oeoisloi.
anu whether hn api@"i IN "i""apie !"
Stays proceeoings oi no'i a.,
MI. iooieHl lheIe ~ ueliuI,er % On ne 70
tne slternatise VIII lssueu 1 q. .ne instance
ol nse ine,np.is "a wy ,esiS'"''ie' anu VIC
nov ussiIe 70 IAN, 'na. W. u.,
m,. oan IN a,ku,ns snis se.i ueihuI.1l, .s ,
We 90 not desire 10 argue any iurther tine
Questions when were raised oy demurrer III
.ne Pieoeeuiis eas., ahu Mnieu "iso VI ee
~ ~ ',,s, an a,u we CO.. s po'.n -, ,au.' III
.ne a. ~ ~, .ne
ccP'Iole ~ ,ne iuains VI ny o""'' ine ue-
lnurrer WnIoii We nie IN ,nis 1''o con,aihs
the gi9uras Oh demurrer Wnicl were inter-
poseu in .ne p,ner' hila VIII 'n'ni one OF
,~oauui'lohhi ones' ohe vi "ese auui,lois
NJ ONES lr E 'na. 'neie y iliisIpihueI 9I
pir,les. lne wln IN 'his o.S. commands
,ne cansassing oVa'u W count .lie IetuIns
rom Preclnc' No. ~ ~, ,ne nhe'npe,s Oh
,ne ieeisia,ure uesieha'eu ,nerein' anu AZ
wnose nls,ahce ine win Has issued'
anu u iheWese suuIesseu ,o Mr' boo'h,
VINO - seciethIy oI the noaru' We coh,ehu
that MI noolh caiiliu, pe conipelleu 70 per,
iUr,h any uutS sPeclneu III ,nls VIII, ana
such neihg the case ne shoulu not pe MADE
par.y W ,ne ao',vn' III the neAs ple,e we
cohtehu .na. tne nv h!v"ueIS oI .ne iegis
iature eahnot uhlte IN this action; mat
'neIe u no UNITY ~ n,eiests ue'Weeh them'
WHICH WHICH Mouiu ehaule .lei,r n, W institute tnls
proceeding cohlointly' ihelr interests are
se.erai, anu Suvn peillg .ne ease separate
nStioh M snoulu pe hislHuteu ny eacn one.
men, Oh course the gruuhu aHectihg your
ulSquaiinchiion On hccoullt Oh interest," we
nave aireauy ulscusseu thht at length' ana
uo not ueslre 10 elaborate upon any
iuInner. 1I
a.. ns court wan, 70 MAKE one temhrk
,ar ,a. ~ peIsoial 20 nyseiI. When TINS mat,
", s'.iai M ulsqulIllcatlon py feasoh Oh
si.eres. '' , on inns motion 10 quash came be-
u. :. a.
anaoiiu.eiy as 9ii niurNluual that / was III no
way ',, nl.1,enaeu III 'nese proceedings or III
.;, .uo iesu', q. .ne sa,ne ,ine as the alterna-
wv wiz ieiuiseu s''..' .nls p1uIu 10 count the
. en.,io N ie'uin @ ns ii'in pIeginct o. ana mas
1 mucl u.s. as Waa a caialuate Tor ONCE and
,, .o.eu ioI a, .nht pIvclhc'' IN my view OF
.ne nih.leI IL W.s Hl ieast lhdeiicate Tor me
W aci anu nnahe an oruer whicn thus re-
mo.eiy oonceIneu nnyselI. Not that felt
Una, tnere Was any personal interest but
simply matter hpoul %nlch l conceived
an llueicno{ III uolne Knew lheh, ana
KNOW now, tnat nhu no interest whatever
IN lti AT .he sanle tiiiie ueenieu IL deli
ehte hht,er ioI Ju1Re on pench 10 make
1ruers Wincl, uireclly OF ihulIectiy concern
hinlseiIi ana " "hs sIhpiy teenhg OF that
kilu thht huRgesteu "hai s'ateu ana
which repeat now.
MI. lo.T looleLl "ouIu me 70 state III con
nectoh WIN the Ihat'er, your honori that
your refusal te Sei IN tne matter without
Delhg ulsquhiiheu py interest Woulu orlng
about e9naltloh OF annlIs Whete no re-
dress ooulu De nau tor wrong uohe. tn-
ger the provisions ot our stalute, lnese pro-
ceedlngs hnVe To 3e instituted IN ollver Bow
county, hnu III oiurr 70 nave tne chHsa tfleu