The Sedalia weekly bazoo. [volume] (Sedalia, Mo.) 187?-1904, 1889-10-22
CIRCUIT COURT.
How This Tribunal of Justice
is Getting Along With
its Docket.

The second week of the October
term of the Pettis county circuit cour
convenes this morning with full
attendance of attorneys, but spare,
audience son the outside" A let O
motions were disposed of. batch
of entries made and the docket O
Thursday, Oct. 10, called all d
which was duly attended To by the
bar. Subsequently, the jury wa'
called and the Haynes.Gorinn Bloch
er case was proceeded with, which
will probably consume the whole oi
to-day.
j, NJ. Byler VS.. r. c. Sneed, gar
nishee b. Currau; garnishee files an
swer to interrogatories.
M. L. Sheppard VS.. III. A. James
ct al. replevin; defendant given until
the 2lst TO answer.
Amos Harrison VS.. Dianah Harri.
son; divorce granted.
Jennie Ledbetter VS.. Isaac Ledbet.
Ter; divorce granted.
William A. Firth VS.. Pricilla
Firth; divorce granted.
John l.. Strong VS.. Emma May
Strong; divorce granted by default.
Curtis Field VS.. w. A. CLANCY ct.
al, equity: E. j. Smith withdraws
as counsel for plaintiff.
Joseph E. Carter VS.. Chas. d. Ray
burn. note; interlocutory judgment by
default.
Clara Hess VS.. d. E. Davis and
George Davis motion filed to dis
miss.
Atkins Grocer Co., VS.. r. j. Hat.
ton ct. al. note; judgment for plaintiff
for slI4.20.
George Heard VS.. James E. Ritchey
ct al, damages, defendant filed mo-
ton to dismiss for failure to file note
sned on
Bed Shobe, VS.. A. W. Winzen-
burg, appeal; plaintiff dismisses ap
peal.
Christian p. Elliott, VS.. j. T. An
derson, note; continued generally.
Stearn and son, VS.. Robert / Hat
ton, let al, note; judgment for plaintiff
for want of answer S3s.16.
Electrical Supply Co, vs.. A. L.
Flelschman, account: continued gener.
ally.
j. G. Parmalee, VS.. J. G. Mise.
appeal: III. G. Sinnett .withdraws as
defendants attorney.
The Haynes-Gordon- Biocher case
was given to the jury late last night
and after remaining out about an
hour, until 9 p. m, the court sent
for them and learned that they had
not agreed. He discharged them un-
til 8 o'clock this morning. 1t is cur
rently reported that the jury stood six
and six, when they left the jury room
asst night. This case was tried last
year and the jury at that time stood
Xix and six and were discharged.
THORNTON VS.. THE MISSOURI Pa
CIFIC,"
read Judge Field from his docket.
g. w. Barnett-The plaintiff is
,eady.
&. E. Yeater defense is
-eady.
Judge Field-Mr. Sheriff, cal
ury of eighteen men.
The sheriff hustled and put eighteen
men before his honor.
Mr.. Barnett questioned the panel
Is to their qualifications.
Mr.. A. j. Harvey said he was
cousin of Mr.. Thornton. the plaintiff.
The court excused him.
Mr.. Burnett addressing Mr..
Uric What is your name?
Urie-C. P. Uric;
Barnett-Where do you reside?
Urie-Saline county.
Barnett addressing the court
This man is evidently not eligible.
Judge Field-Mr. Uric, you are
excused.
Barnett addressing the sixteen
men Which of you gentlemen is
1amed Lancaster?
A young man held up his hand.
Barnett-Where do you reside?
Lancaster-At Green Ridge.
Barrett What is your occupation.
Lancaster-Loafng. Laughter.
Barrett-What do you do when you
work.
Lancaster-Travel.
The following names were selected
as the jury to try the case:
d. ii. Norris, Sam'l Reavis, w. B.
Elliott, Louis Klein, q. Moore, j. F.
Rrovles + NJ Jones. I II. Johnson.