Arizona weekly journal-miner., 1889-01-23
Supreme Court Calendar.

supreme VoObt Sot0O00t.
 The following is the list cf cases to be heard at the present session of the supreme court;
 4I. Territory of Arizona, plaintiff and appellee, vs. Geo. W. Kay. defend ant and appellant; Yavapai coun;y.
 4s. Territory of Arizoua, plaintiff and appellee. vs. P. F. Clanton, defend ant and appellant; Apache county.
 46. Territory of Arizona, plaintiff and appellee, vs Francisco Baca, de fendant and appellant; Apache county.
 47. Territory of Anzona. plaintiff and appellee, vs. Edward Dooly. defendant and appellant; Pima county.
 4S. United States, plaintiff and ap- pellee, vs. Captain lack, defendant and appellant; Maricopa county.
 4o, United States, plaintiff and ap- police, ys. Gon-Shay.ee, defendant and appellant; Maricopa county.
 SO. United States, plaintiff and ap- pellee, vs. Saves, defendant and appel lan,; Maricopa county.
 5I. United States, plairtif ard ap. police. vs. Miguel. defendant and ap- pellan,, Maricopa courty. g. United States, plaintiff and aP- police, ss Clith-Kah. defendant and sp- pellant; Maricopa county. s. United States. plaintiff and ap- police. vs rll-laehil-lay, defendant and appellant; Maricopa county. s. United States, plaintiff and ap- police. vs. Hay-skin-say-soh-lon, defend ant and appellant; Manoop' county. s5.. United States, plaintiff and ap- police, vs. Lah-cohn. defendant and al'- pellont, Maiicops county. s6. United States, plaintiff and ap- police, ys. Has.tir-6u-to-day. detendant and appellant; Maritopa county.
 
 s7. United States, plaintiff and ap- police, vs. Txay-zin-tiith. defendant and appellant; Msricops county
 s44 P w. Suaaan. plaintiff and ap- pellee. vs, ]. R. Kilpanick, defendant and appellant; Yavapai county.
 PAS. Pima County, laintff and ap- pellant, vs. ] H. Martin, defendant and appellant; Pima county.
 s46 (. s. Clark, appellant, vs. James Reilly, appellae; Cochise county.
 a47. Andrew Garrett, Dennis Mu- Carty and Richard C. McAfferty. appel lants, vs. Daniel C. Cary, James York and Heury Fry, appellees; Cochise county
 PAS. Molie Herbert, plaintiff ard appellee, vs. Pasqual Nigro, defendant and appellant; Cochise county.
 .4o: T. w Johnston, plaintiff and appellee, vs. R. E. Morrison. defendant and appellant; Apache county.
 2so The United Sta'es of America, appellee, vs. One Hundred and fit'y Head of Cattle and Fifty-tSo Calves, appellant; Pima county.
 PSI. Territory of Arizona, appellee, vs. The Persons, Real Estatc, Land ard Property described m the Delinquer't List of the County of Mohave. Territory of Arizona, for the year 1881, appellant; Mohave county.
 es2. Territory ef Arizona, responl,, ant, vs. The Persons, Associations, Cor porations. Firms, and Companies ard Real Estate, Land and Property descria- ed in the Delinq tent List of Apache County for the year 1881, appellant; Apache county.
 25s. Art Mcdonald, appellee. vs. A. x P. K. R. Go, appellant; Yavapai county.
 s54. NJ. G. Samaneigo, appellee, vs. T. L. Stiles, appellant; Pima county. s55. N. Herrick X c. H. N. Luhrs, appellants, vs. Wm. 4. Hancock ard wife, respondents. as6. Territory of Arizona, plaint fl and appellee. vs. The Persons. Firms, Associations, Companies, Real Estate,
 
 Land and Property described in the Delinquent List of the county ot Yavap"i, for the year 1881, appellant; Yavspai county.
 as7., The Santa Rita Land and Min ing Go, appellant, vs. T. Llllie Morer, appellee; Pima coun,y.
 2sS. Emu,a P, Rlder, plaintiff and appellant. vs. Charles w Leach and CC. Copeland defendants and appellee; l; Cochise county.
 aso. C. D. Putnam and NJ. k. Put nam, plaintiffs and appellees, vs. Michael Kennedy, defendant and appellant Pinal county.
 zoo The Singer Manufacturing Co i, plaintiff and appellant. vs. Thomas Wuden and Charles w. Tillman. de fendants and respondents; Pinsl county.
 a6I. Henry W. Smith. ct a.., appel lants, vs, B. Blackmore. appellee; Cochise county.
 76s. A. < P. R. K. CO, appellant, vs. l. T. Lesueur. Teas, etc, respondant; Apache county.