The Sedalia weekly bazoo. [volume] (Sedalia, Mo.) 187?-1904, 1889-10-22

| B. F. Thornton, the plaintiff in Che
case, was employed as a guard at the
Missouri Pacific shops. and while on
duty, he claims that he arrested sole
Solesburgh," who subsequently was
convicted and spent sometime in Jail,
as the penalty for his interference.
! This case was still in progress at 3
O'Clock this evening and will not be
concluded before tonight, if then.
/ The jury in the Haynes-Gordon-
Blocher case were, at 3 o'clock this
afternoon, still out, with the report
that they stood nine to three.
The following entries were made
on the docket this morning.:
Henry Llmm vs.. Missouri Pacific
railway, appeal dismissed by plain
tiff and costs paid.
Cunningham Bros. vs. Frances
McAlester, account plaintiff files
amended petition and defendant
given until next Monday TO answer.
Chas. A. Masongill VS.. III. w.
Wood, contract 4; continued gen.
orally.
Assignment of John w. Houx;
assignee files petition for discharge.
Hinsdale d Menlfee vs.. d.
Wyrck, appeal; continued generally.
Frank w. Shultz VS.. Fred Wilson,
account and attachment; judgment
for plaintiff for 5000 and attach
ment sustained.
w. s. Shirk vs.. James E. Bouldin
ct sl, account; interlocutory judgment
by default and continued.
w. s. Shirk VS.. James f. BouIdin,
account; judgme for plaintiff for
1926.
Jacob Rudy vs. Mary Rudy, d.
vorce; dismissed by plaintiff at his
cost.
Rasa Nj. Hedrick vs.. Ernest J.
Hedrick, divorc-; Interlocuiory de.
cree by default for plaintiff
Late yesterday evening the jury in
the HAYNES. Gordon and Blocher case
agreed and gave the defendant
judgment for value of property re-
p!evied. and $40 damages.
The jury in the case of Thornton
vs. Missouri Pacific railway for the
reward offered during the 1886 strike
tried yesterday gave a verdict for
Thornton for s333.45.
The entries to-day are:
u. ID. Lswery vs. Peter Scally;
stricken from docket.
First National bank VS.. David
BOuldiD; judgment for plaintiff for
Sc ,50410.
f. r. Smith, constable, VS.. E. A.
White defendant withdraws answer
and files demurrer demurrer argued
and taken under advisement.
Same VS.. same same entray.
j. G.. Parmerlee VS.. j. r. Mize
judgement for plaintig for $3.50.
j. Mier, VS.. Hansberger, d Rec
gan; stricken from docket.
J. Z. Higgins vs.. III. w. Martin |
judgment for plaintiff for SIP 90.
Zimmerman d Harter, VS.. Ramsey
d. Harrah; judgement for plaintiff,
for s312.2S.
Mary Weaver ct al. vs.. Elizabeth
Cecil ; report of sale and stipulation
filed.
Jacobs Bros. VS.. NJ. P. R'y Co., |
garnishee of Cosgrove continued.
Sedalia Gaslight Co. vs. w.
r. Mercer motion for new
trial overruled; plaintiff given to Jan.
1. 1890 to file bill of exceptions
and affidavit and bond. Appealed to
Kansas City court of appeals.
Bradley VS.. Farmer; plaintiff grant
ed leaYe to amend petition; motion to
strike out answer.
Third National bank VS.. j. M.
Durrell ct at; Milton Durrell files
plea in abatement.
E. p. Barrett VS.. Richard Harris;
plaintiff files reply.
Home Lumber Co. va. j. l.. Fer
guson interlOcutory judgment +; con-
tinued.
Home Building Il Loan assoc alton
VS.. VIM. Collins ; same entry.
Same vs. A. Hill same entry.
w. HI. Mason VS.. Sarah G.. Mason:
plaintiff files reply.
Wright VS. Byler: judgment for
plaintiff
Hahn VS. Byler same entry
Goodwin VS. Bowman same entry |
Barnhart Mercantile Co VS. +.
Avasino : plaintiff appeals
Moline Plow Co VS. E, A. White
ct al 4; g. HI. Rector files inter
pleader
This afternoon the suit of G. G.
Heard against j. E. Ritchey and 9TH
era for $4,000 is being tried before q |