The weekly Union times. [volume] (Union C.H., South Carolina) 1871-1894, 1889-03-08
THE PARNELL INQUIRY.
A Leading Witness Against the
Home Rule Leader C0nf6sses. S
Admitting the London "Timesn
Letters We're Porgeries.

After . searching examination OF sixty
days, tho Parnell inquiry In London has rs-
suited in the most sensational developmsnta
The Parnell Commission, an 10 r. called was
instituted 10 examine into allegations OF the
London Times that Mr.. Parnell bad written
letters sympathizing with criminal efforts
murder and the use Of dynamite-to further
the cause Of Irish Home Rule Tho Times
Sr Parns Criminal &C action % n
half Of 1reland's liberation from English
domination. The Irish Home Rule leader
asserted that these letters were forgeries and
s mission was sa appointed to take testimony, and
the trial began over two months ago.
The most important witness upon whom
the Times relied was one Richard Pigott, who
had furnished the paper with the alleged Par
sion that they were genuine. Upon cross
examination, however, Pigott went to pieces
completely when confronted with letter
which he had written to Archbishop Walsh,
letters were fraudulent. In further cross
Examination Pigott involved himself I'm a
complete network Of lies, and the case Of the
clincher upon the matter Pigott made a
confession that the letters were forgeries, and
then disappeared. A London dispatch gives
these further particulars: s,,...s
ness In the Parnell case, has made startling
confession. he declares the Parnell letters,
published by the London Times, absolute
forgeries
velopment was made at the morning session
Of the Parnell Commission.
Sir Charles Russell, counsel for Parnell,
arose shortly after the opening Of the court
and stated that on Saturday last at the
house Of Henry Labouchere, editor of Lon
don Truth, Pigott signed a confession. This
confession stated in SO many words that the
alleged Parnell letters printed by the Times,
and on which the Times based its charges
against the Irish members, were forgeries.
Mr.. George Augustus Sala Yves also present
when the confession was made.
Pigott had, without invitation, called on
Labouchere declined to listen with
was summoned, and Pigott confessed
that he was the forger. He admitted
Messrs Egan, Parnell, Davitt and O'Kelly.
He also admitted that he perjured himself
before the Commission.
The statement of Sir Charles Russell was
corroborated by the witnesses - : "a.
Having made this extraordinary statement
to the court, Sir Charles Russell applied for q
warrant for the arrest of Pigott The Presid-
ing Justice said that within IN hour war
rant would be ready.
Mr.. Shannon. Dublin solicitor, who rs.
sisted the Times in constructing its case, was
then called to the witness box. Mr.. Shan
non testified that on Sunday night Pigott
came to him and gave him q written state
ment denying the statement he had made on
Saturday to Mr.. Labouchere that he had
forged all the letters. The first batch Pigott
declared lie believed to be genuine. The sec
ond batch, including two Of the Parnell let
ters, was forged by himself and Casey. The
third batch, which includes those of Davitt
and O'Kelly, were similarly forged
Pigott added, in his statement to Shannon,
that he now having stated the truth and
confessed before the world, the Times
should deal leniently with him.
Sir Charles Russell, Mr.. Parnells counsel,
cross examined Mr.. Shannon, who stated in
answer to q question that he took no steps to
prevent Pigott from escaping, but that he
fully expected to see him appear in court.
It was very evident to all present that the
Times had. met its Waterloo, and that the
case was in a state of complete collapse.
The following cablegram has been received
In Chicago from Michael Davitt by Alexan-
der Sullivan:
"Pigott has bolted. It Is the general be-
lief here that the Times and the Government
have paid him to clear out"