Wichita eagle., 1889-06-08
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS


Topeka, Kan, June 1.-THE following
opinions were rendered by the supreme
court today:
Horton, c. 1.-THE Atchison, Topeka &
Santa Fe Railroad company VS. James Fly,
error from Pawnee county, affirmed;
Hedgewig Reinert VS.. S. H. Brunt ct a..
error from Lincoln county, reversed.
Valentine, J.-Abner Shinn VS.. Ella
Shinn, error from Bourbon county, af-
firmed; II. J. O'Brien ct al vs. B. Smith,
error from Elm county, reversed; the Chi
cago, Kansas & Western Railway VS.. Will
liam VI. Hurst, error from Ottawa county,
reversed; the Chicago, Kansas & Western
Railway company VS.. John Odill, error
from Dickinson county. affirmed; the State
Of Kansas VS. Clinton Reno, appeal from
Finuey county, affirmed.
Johnston, is 6. Vanwye VS.. Z. J..
Clark, original proceeding in quo war
ranto. Judgment for defendant: L. H.
Hethecker VS., 2. a. FtZhugh, error from
Mcpherson county motion Tor rehearing
and modification of Judgment allowed;
the Chicago, Kansas Il Western railway
VS.. Isaac Grover, error from Dickinson
county, reversed.
Simpson. C.-The state of Kansas ex rel
VS.. the commissioners of Gray county,
original proceeding in mandamus. writ
denied; Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe
Railway company VS.. jeremiah Gibson,
error from Elk county, affirmed; The
Southern Kansas railway VS.. Walter
Crocker, error from Allen county, af-
frmed.
Clogston, C.-The Interstate Consolidat-
ed Rapid Transit railway VS.. w. H. Fox,
administrator. error from Wyandotte
county, affirmed.
Holt &C. w. Nimocks VS.. C. W.
Wells ct al. error from Barton county,
reversed; J. A. Hammers ct al. VS.. j. J..
Merrick ct al. error from Harper county.
reversed; Phelps, Bigelow Wind Mill
company VS.. Fred Piercy, error from
Johnson county, reversed; John Nicker-
booker ct al. VS.. A. J. Ream, error from
Smith county, affirmed; A B. Zering VS..
A. Benton. error from Shawnee county,
reversed Atchison. Topeka Sc Santa Fe
Railway company VS.. James \. Morgan,
error from Usage county, reversed; the
kaw Valley Fair association vs.. Geo. w.
Miller, error from Potrawatomie county,
modified; Samuel Leiberick ct al.
company, error from Phillips county,
affirmed; the state ex. rel, VS.. y. f.
Watson, original proceeding in man
damus, writ denied; The Continental In
surance company, of New York vs.. Will
liam II. Chastain. error from Mcpherson
company of New York VS.. ID. I. Olsen,
error from Mcpherson county, dismissed;
Union Pacific Railway company VS..
George \. Coggeshall, error from Els
worth county, dismissed: II. ". Leonard
q Co. VS.. y. W. Bergren ct al, error from
Finney county, dismissed; L. W. Pattison
vs.. Laura Tennyeck ct al. error from
ct al, VS.. d. I. Mcfarland, error from
kingman county, dismissed: Smith Sem
pie VS.. Doc Dunn, error from Rush county,
dismissed; State ex rel. vs.. Levi
Churchill. sheriff, original proceeding in
quo warranto. dismissed: Missouri Pacific
railway company vs. George Litchfeld, err
ror from Rice county, dismissed; in re
John Thompson, original proceedings in
habeas corpus, judgment In favor of the
petitioner; Leise Chemical Manufacturing
company vs. Kinds, ketcham & Co, error
from Douglas county, dismissed: First
National bank of Peoria VS.. Edward 6
Jaffrey et al, motion for rehearing over
ruled: James II Adams rs. Robert Speck,
probate judge. motion FOR rehearing over
ruled; Union Pacific railway company VS.
J. ". Springsteen, ministrstor, motion
for rehearing overruled; William K Ire
land VS. W. 4. George, ct al, motion for
rehearing overruled.
HOW THEY REGARD 1T.
FoRr ScoTT, Kan. June THE Monitor
will publish tomorrow morning & synopsis
OF the ruling made by the railrad commits
sioners on Kansas freight rates this morn
ing. The ruling breaks down the dis
ordinations IL distributing rates hereto
fore enforced in favor Of Kansas City, and
declares that the Kansas man is entitled
To an equal chance with the Missouriau.
The decision Is received here by the whole
sale and manufacturing interest With
great satisfaction.