Oxford Democrat. [volume] (Paris, Me.) 1833-1933, 1889-05-14


William N Palmer. Porter.
Harm n. stevens. lrYehurE
Enhraim Wentworth. Hiram.
Nnert n. Whhrhuusr. SWEDEN.
p. D. Wit. Norway.
Upon retiring tu their r,om for Tie
election IT a forvman. shoicc Nas made
20 llun. Nihion T. lionnet. ~ HuCkhsld.
a man Wsli-kuovn to thr people - "a
fnrl Couufy. having s~r,~l thru In an
ahle manner in thc tegislaiurv 81 49,,
a. a state SENATOR. aui horn a PROMINENT
Republican in ~" cuuuiY for macy
Years.
ruI Itr.l.
ui.a matter % pride Co the Oxford
Rear. that thrrr 20 The able and learned
Justice. 81 thr ~uprrmr judicial Court
arr mrmhers 20 tir nnr family AMI
serr taken from The Oxford Rar.
Al ahl, Mains Historian .ays 80 judge
Walton
Cl.srt.. Wsstrr Watau 90. i-sru ia Nsstr,
utf.ri taarfl. issrenlsf - l'it 10 sl-ni
ault ~ 81 sarf trsrs on tNlfer. ~ usup
stIrs 49, t'srr o. 49, 1rsf srara.f - III rliri
90 nrrr co. frffrsHi fhr tNfrrri iArrIIHsrai 20
60 Ir NuEns lsl nri frraaIusrl tua reafH W.
snFruaris sartri ~ Pc t1ss ia l-'.,nn anl
iasa sta.Is.i isu a. 80 s.i.iIti.l A. thr IA
b. - fr rrulfars Or tranrti a. uas sirftr.i
i..rfr hrfHrHrT fHr tfk fHr.i Hurif 49, sfftri
f.ar fssrs. fraaa isss fl lslf o. ts,.rr'.rf 49,
II r..Frl A.. Aanaru frun etah r.arr
r..ts.f A.. tssrina Stew hr 49, rv.Ilss in
Irr. o. aasflstrI taanf. AtHrurf in Anlre
srarli1 taaHff aai .Fffri INV ffsrs lif 80
s.l.t.i e. tnrr rsss .u e. ~sss.rl t.ngrvssa'lsI
80 o. go ssssI..a nf ia 49, 81. 49,. tat
90 see arr-. .ntlsi De- Ifr Uf tnr -urrvnaf D.
fi.IaI tHart af MsInf. D. gel DE- sfai 4.
81. NJ iUs. al b.. ~. i-.n rsarI-ini.i
t-.I srrtr.I r.si.nu.lasIr sIrFf ttai uraf
IHIsr Mal.n sts o. s.n nf Aftrruss g. IL
81. ...-r.s.i i,.ss..--r :. i.sl' g. iissush N
.ia.sffff nf 1fhn kinIaL af MfNan. ani has
several tnIhfnrn tHasI irrirs h.s alfantaFrf
81 ",iari ,.eni' ,.ess 80 ~. sh',,',
Lssrfr tr 49, fru riaa's iu Co. state
afuIrF o. .Ian.is =ss.u.l Al rHrr u 'fh siaH1a
tr tss tsrn sss.-.siri IT, thri ia.i'orsl'r
a.s.ls fsesai tf trs rvtrrr.ru af ieirv Arrft.n
rasaf' t-t.ur'ri ts iuirr Mafrn
At WoUA
ne nl.t JAR, trial 81 tir term oprurd
Ws,iue..iny.
U. plaintiff. verr Prank e, lauieu
an.l jane. y ii"Icluu. thr defendant
e1. Hannibal turti. fhr phiuili. r--
.iIs Iu Ifthsl Ihr irfru.nuf at Wet
Paris. llou. Eithari 4. ipr 90 hrihri
,unIuttrl che Cl.r Cor thr PLAINTIFF.
lleuirA e. Davis. Esq- 20 faris Too tir
lrfruor.
Ts uas an lriIou on spcrnl conirat
and va. hrulchi hv ihe plaintiff Go w.
cover frr thr value ~ e. cvrtaiu meat cari
Cop vhirh thrf huilt Coz and shipped to
d. defendant III date 9th wit VA.
June -. i>~>. ulr rlainiif. Prank q.
HluIrit aui james y. llolg,ion arrr
carpenter. iu 49,. running "a .hop Tor
,arflacr Woodwork. &c. The drirui-
auf. Hannibal curtis. b. "a carriagv irnnrr
40 We.i l'au. ami b. accustomed o. take
contrasts to huill cnrriagr.. Ia thr
prr.sut ct.e b. had made "a contract With
4 meat man 10 Wet iari. o. huii for
him meat cart which shuuld D. first
,iass AZ thr defendant ave in every
particular. Accordingly. Mr.. 'uriis
vent to che shop 90 iaulcit & brown, in
Hrthrl. gave them thr dimensions anil
ruga reil them tn hulld a meat cart top
which should hll that part ~ his con-
tract. agrreiug. as both stle. testify. Co.
tat tueuit-d,r dollar. ior the same
When t Wa completed aud delivered Lac
The piaiuiins' shop iu Bethel accoriing
o. contract. n Wa arranged that the
plaintiffs shuuh notify thr defendant
"a ben ihs top Wa rrady aud that the de-
fcndani .hoald comr o. Bethel AZ
tsr o. fhi. The phiniin. dh ani
revived iu reply card from de-
PENDANT saving in substance that h Wa
hot and that De- did not want o. come f.
trr h.. AMI requesting thsm o. ship % tn
him With hill 81 the same. The plaintiff.
shipp.,l the tup todsfrniant 40 Wc.t Par
l.. hy Grand Trunk Railway. The drfrnl-
auf claims that the lssis va. not built ac-
coriIug o. contract aud that De- notified
the plaiuiif. That Il va three inche.
t,p short in lensth anil ~. not such a top
a. d. had contracted Tor. IL shipped 10
hack Co. plaintiff. az Bethel. They ~
fu.s-i to take b. frum the station ani u
finally wsut Co Portland 81. unclaimed
freight. Afier rrmaining cat two hour.
ou thls ease he jury came into Court aud
reported that they werv unable o. agrvr.
Til~ Court advised thrm in rrgard to
their duiies AZ Jurors and again ssnt
them uui. Afirf about i've minute.
morr they returned With a verdict for
The defendant. The presiding justice
rad o. thrm The opinion 20 chief jus
ticg shaw la relation Go ths duties ~
Jurors and thanked thru Tor their
prompt agrvenieut.
Th- sevond ca-s for trial Nas that 81
samuel Me.rr,c ~. Eruhen 4. chad
huurne.
William :. Firrrv. k.q.. ~ Grrat Pals,
New Hsmp.hirv. and Hon. james :.
Wright appeared Cor plaintiff AMI Hast
ings a >on. and Hon. \. II. Walker Tor
defence.
Tlis action va. hruughi by plaintiff Ia
recover pay Tor boarding defendant
vi fr. Mr. ChadhOurue, the wife Of
Reuben 4. Chadhourne. Nas the hrst
witnr,. called she told a sensational
story n how lie va. obliged o. 20 away
and hoaui With MsssrNe. aid that H.
fure shs went away there was NO meat.
Hour. nor gr,scsri~s Ia thu bou.e anc that
.hs Was compelled o. live upou Indian
meal aud water. Witness testified that
her husband hal Kicked aud struck her
aud told her that b. had a right o. Lick
her cat ~ al. house AZ any time heCause
.he Ma not his wife.
several witnesses werr called Who tes-
tihe,l o. The destitute condition ~ the
Chadhourne family. The defence put In
a denial II the state ~ Affairs charged hv
plaintiff. Mr.. Chadtourne testified that
b. did provide suitably for his family
aud for his wife aud aid that she went
90 Mr.. Meserye's 90 board because H.
would not give her a dee,l Of the house
and gave this A. the cause ~ the trouble.
Nerlict Tor dsfenoe.
The next case for the jury was that ~
the Inhabitants ~ sumner ". the Inhab-
itants II NOrridgewock. Hon. John l..
Swasey for plaintiff. u. II. lIersey aud
Edward Lowe % NorridgcwOck. for de-
PENDANT.
This action Vas pauper case 90 r.
cover the sum 0f ss5l. Is from the town
of N0rridgewock where Il l. claimed that
the pauper belonged. The question Ia
dispute and the point upon which the
case hinged was In relation Ia the notice
o. the defendant town and the denial. IL
was admitted that the legal notice was
given and received but Il was denied that
the denial was ever received BY the town
ii.