New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1889-06-15

homo 70 any of the acts disclosed by shs ties ron5
ne Is not shown 10 have been CONNECTED In sny Wy
crS S Sv was deeoyed away. He is MT shown 70
eonnested in sny way With any Of The Rs9s G sns
x With the rsnaag q So Carbon sosisss Or Viii VA
The parties who occupied Il The evidence %Sns
Il ali testimony in this record as 10 Sullivan were
seeond-The second theory may be SAID e es thss
b vas Murdered 70 prevent csposurs as e the dO ,S
Of TIE so-ealled triangle have ns very un
sesssssSs one il doss not appear that the deesssss
rgp was in possession Sieh would @fS die wtS him
So the Object Of removing MS testimony could not
8 ga Z g ven Ae ssaS h. wpaa ssi:s
,ss sss IS S, Ts s assa ' " su S
Sr n and rsy s TS Dr. aecsy O
Ace 70 svss:s could 'p By By S' Sc
pothsr hs syys,ss,oS BY s reason Of some Order
regulation or proceeding Of the United BroiherhoS ,
T as sSr0a aSyas ' IN maze o
camp g proceeding or act tae par, Of tie
q c e such s ws' Na no evidence
sosss ;ny act Of sSs Organization" Ut any ''D''
moSsd By mesSbers Of that organization, who were
,Sss s, he Ss.Ss OF OF DssS %
love that he was British spy that they acted upon
s NV ow " spy samp Of the oreanzaon
vet Of the examination OF tho Untea BrotheIhooa "
s.. ss0w Seer G two years ago ss others stated
resigned and quit all connection with the
s,ss s n anv samp S or orssnSao It IS not seen
how sullivan could influence the action of such organ:
b 1 being bS saS SsrS
Der Nor is It shown in the evidence thai sullivan
any common plan be pursued by them, or thai ne
Sa any relations, business socially or otherwise
wooena OF that he had any particular social rea
tions friendship with eny other person wnoh, tps p,
sknowlng anything with regard to this conspiracy
THE coRosER's JURY INFLUENCED BY HEARsAT
think that the coroncrs jury, in bringing In their
Instrumentation or IN bringing In their hnding tha'
sullivan either was an accessory had guilty know
sagc Of the murder. largely influenced oy hesrsaS
evidence There can be no doubt from this 'esumohy
that suspicion points strongly toward the respondent
a 70 Of S sppas
been furnished by Sullivan himself sh6S Io9 Isss Al
Sn AZ the %o Of dns " ,se Jury I or COMMITTEES
q SIX. Su.vsn demonstrated or protested against his
s asy ' Of Nav sns 70 consider their
ssved for the first time communication or pfotes..
ss,a sn. ws q b. fssffSSS, fS
lurer and scoundrei and went into some pss Se%
ssTs'; which e dG shows. ''r..ln :d 's Bite.
end malignant hatred o. Cronin AmnouSn Vas moi
msds s public until two or three weeks after the mas
81 on might ?. urged on as sSa;S 70 S SrSnin as
sensible. reasoning man 10 mus nm s"y nrodWeon OF
engaged in r the bad se Sm sai and his con-
nccon with the charge It seems Sn 1Ss, Se %Ss
think that 4 ne % he sn coud ever have prcmu
gated that protest two weeks after Dr. 'r0n'a "''
me Evidence points to sullivan person who IN
sonnsc,ion with Dr. Cropin, might have reScnss
-, fall: .c, 10 ; :S%s any the s'''s srsss
@ 5si 5, sSs svdsaoe to have
sasosers Jury evidently knew this fact and It Is a
from hsis o SSTGs A rhefc IS no DOUBT but
sss tSsy believe that Alexander Sullivan was con-
sssd s.s s1dsSGs sSr 90
n their duty IN thai b6 SS Se n recon-
mend that he be held without ball. very common ana o
usual form q verdict where the RiSO % The corones
sns ~ rsan tSst every one DO held against whom
there SonGecfSSn .r w Sa,r w STo S be
cssdsnce is clear or the presumption OF guilt great 70
> recommend that they be held without ball
rEsr1ssoSY NOT SUCH AS WOULD PRODUCE CON
vIorpoG.
INT upon careful reading Of this testimony ana
.4rtS,nv ont from this testimony all but tho legA
apidence cannot land think no Impartial man csu'
mako up my mind IL wouh be possible lot any 'uts
To convict the respondent Sullivan upon tns' oV'-
lance alone That is one Of tho tests as 10 WDeho1
tho party is entitled to BAH or not Inc more ISo'
fhss party is an enemy Of another person who gets
k,led is NO proof Of his having Killed. aoed
or abctted or having been engaged In eoo-
,uracy to kill that person. the eofoNor
iury DO not determine guilt any more than ms court
does uron this Investigation. The coroners a knSm
a .s' ,h's son had nSe 81! ne fsts
They expected that new facts vouid develop, ana
s sss ". d Sss y H rs liberty i he entitled S
uSdsr .he law o. Constitution On show 1ns s HIM gully
TSs evidences a Il is presented TO the court or son
,si,sns SsssTsts ts s afiIoe sGi' '''' '0' viz
ssnas0 say after @" very
aiwsys Be resolved IN favor Of humsn M6e,yS ch he
come g shs sSne9' sS0S ne n bsa ousS should b
Of such character positively to assure DIS "pp'"
anee. 40. -,n,
aud started in TO fndict John j. Moroney ana
Sh..,,s McDonsld. the men under arrest in New
Vary Early this morning States Attorney Longe-
nco,rv, and Luther Latin Mills had long con-
.rf,at,on IN the formers private office The SUD
sa.. soS the conference WAS the extraditon OF tne
N.,, Yo-t, men and the refusal Of Governor hil
~ dsbycr them up. on the pretsxt that the eVi'
Gvsass gaiust them was insufficient WA
.s-,ca bo,vecn Judge Longenecksr and MI miih
49, the best thing to do was to ind'ct the mer
<, one. on the evidence already nt hand ana thei
to,denand their extradition. In accordance WIZ
II, resolution on the part Of the States Attorney
an the witnesses who had testified in the inVesugu
,,on by the last Grand Jury and ocfore tn'
corouer in regard TO j. B. simons' were eeu
for Among them were Throcl>morton, tee Fa
estate agent who rented the room In oiark'SU '
Ire mysterious Simons; Hatfield, the salesman >
al NEhn n
pevells: the clerk at McCoy's botel, "ner. ~
believed that Moroney. or si"ohS' - -
and n number Of others whose Names ~. go c.
Be- learned. It was the INTENTION u ". 49, -,
~ ana States Attorney to collect all the ev'
-. .r.,nst Moroney. in osder to make the IN
49,. 80 .s stronp as possible -,