Custer chronicle. [volume] (Custer City, Black Hills, D.T. [S.D.]) 1880-1890, 1889-11-23

BOARD county commissioners, CuS-
ter County.
20. w. &. Bower,
VS..
Board County Commissioners, Gus
ter Couhty.
2l. Mary L. Clark,
VS..
Isaac Clark.
%. f. p. Hesnard,
VS..
Plunkett & Lynch.
%. II. B. Lovett, Repd't.
VS..
A. Ii. Kemmish, Applt.
"a. +. Holcomb,
VS..
NJ. R, Maxson,
%. John Siers,
f. II. Flynn, ct. al.
2G. f. Dornan, ct. al, Respd't,
G. A. slddons, Appl't.
81. +. P Hesnard,
VS..
Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Val
lev r. r. Co.
2S. Geo. II. Holden,
w. re-. III. r~rynn; er. g..
90. Kellogg & Stearns,
VS..
Custer County, S. d.
80. n. c. Wood,
Wm. S. Wood.
81. +. c, Ayres,
VS..
q ~
80. r. NJ. Coulter, Respd't,
j. X. Richards, App,'t
80. Plunkett & Lynch,
VS..
f. II, Flynn.
"a. VIM. A. Wilson & Co.,
80. VIM. A. Wilson & Co.,
+. Il. Curran.
SO. &. f. Porter,
VS..
S. NJ. Booth, and ID. w. Webster.
81. Vim. f. Wright,
VS..
Lewis Wilson
So. C. Kleemann,
VS.,
80. Peregoy q Moore,
VS..
+. II. Flynn.
40. Willett Manufacturing Co.,
VS..
A. L. Van Devort.
II. The Faller & Johnson Manufactur-
ing Company,
VS..
B. o. Palmeter, ct. al.
PROCEEDINGS, TUESDAY.
Panels of jurors being incomplete,
special venires were issued.
JAS. G. Sanders, J. r. Cruson and w
j. Bowles appointed bailiffs for present
term.
Piled For admission to fes bhsvins Ap;
court having become satisfied that they
were attorneys of record in o,her states.
administered the formal oath and sign
ed orders for their admission: w q
Temple, Joseph Flynn, and w. q.
Porter.
The following cases were called
Kellogg d Stearn VS.. Custer County
Trial OF demurrer to complaint.
Wilson & Co. VS.. f. NJ. Stewart. Tried
to court. Judgement for plaintiff.
Panel OF Petit jurors completed. The
following is its membership: j. S. En-
dicott, NJ. Mallon, Lewis Allen Isaac
Ainsley, ID. Mcintosh, C.. w. Gorsuch
). X. Maddox, G.. L. Smith. William
spangler, B. +. Porter, w. r. Lemons,
Altman Herbert, Henry Way, Frank
Bender, Frank Towner, II. K. Grifis. A.
Wilcox, Geo. Gaylord, Joseph Carr.
Chas. Crofford, Harry West, c. l..
Hamilton, Oren Metcalf, Jas Barnes.
The case of III. Lovett VS.. A. II. Kem-
mish, appeal from justice court, tried to
jury. Verdict for plaintiff for 1927. 90.
WEDNESDAY.
Court in session. Grand jury com
pieted and sworn in, whereupon the
court delivered the following charge:
~ENTLEME OF THE GRAND JURY
desire to call your attention to the
duties imposed upon you, by law, and
the matters which will be presented to
you for your investigation, and / will
confine myself to those provisions of the
law which have been enacted into the
form of statutes.
A Grand Jury is a body of men, con-
of not less than sixteen nor mo re
than t~wenty-three jurors, empa neled
and sworn to a true presentment make
Of all public offences against the state
committed triable within the county for
which the court is holden.
No Indictment shall be found. O
shall any ~presentment nor accusation be
made without the concurrence of at least
twelve jurors. The grand jury has
power, and it is their duty to inquire in
TO the public offences committed or tri-
able In the county, and to present
them tothe court either by presentment.
indictment or accusation in writing
A presentment is an informal statement.
in writing, by the grand jury, represent
ing to the court that a public offence
has been committed which is triable in
the county, and that there is reasonable
ground for believing that a particular
individual, named or described, has COM
m.tted il. An indictment is an ac-
I'm w~ritioo nrasant.J h.,