Daily Republican., 1889-10-01
| CoIrRT YESTERDAY.
bus psAVls CASE ALMOST
ENDED.
.,ooftio Giants-Points Submitted
IN ,put, by counsel ON Each
side-Argumcnts to
the Jury.

- ease # Henrietta v. Parvis vs..
i N * Is. Railroad Company 10
%, daua,es for the death OF her
',nd "a one Of the most remarkable
Ir,ri In the courts OF this State. IL
,ird Inst May, aud after nearly q
la lr.u consumed in hearing tes-
ny ard the arguments Of council the
aud II was marked for u
.,al L this term. Another special
VAS drawn and tho case again COM
red lssl Wednesday. The remain
4, lhe week was consumed In hear
sl,pessas, aud the taking of testi-
= clo,ri last Saturday afternoon.
= Of Tie most eminent counsel oi
S,s 4, stc engaged on the case, the
MD he.ng represented by the Hon. ]
flc, 4 Lore Of this city, aud Albert
.tlle. lisa, OF Elkton, Md.
M Constable, It 10 isald that he
never allied to recover damages in
a a-.tYst railroad companies, but
i.ii- llfst care that Le has ever
..cl,rl 100 Delaware.
M GreulAuj company is represented
elton. George Gray OF this city and
rec y. Masscy, Esq OF Dover.
MI 4. .ugft lecOuvened at S O'Clock
,,tlsy nicrnoln, the Chief Justice
.oup,yd tbAl each side would be llu-
4 Atollr,t Aours Tor Argument. Sena.
tirs, f.m4rkcd that he and HIS col
.-usvgrs Wiling to submit tho case
,,byu, atsemeut, bnt Mr.. Lore objected,
Isall Nj. C0nltab'e had fully pre-
Iral 'sens.iyes for ergument. Mr..
~ opened Il rs by submitting the
loFia. tr he Court, on which he
nry thould be charged.
|. l-. '.adant is bOuud, iu running
tHlpt--4gtoes tfe public highways OF
..a. rl exercise reasonable care
q -4 tuWaru travellers upon such
D & 'ar pproaeh OF the engine.
.4NH. -LrA reasonable care and
-y., t particular case, viii de-
.4a. -.cuH iang.s Of the clte,
'C'' .. .g 'h' Jury.
.-agl,L. the defendant may
.rg I.a VITA tho statute OF this
-.fuH thr cugIue bsll eontinu
i} Urtt hundred yards before
,HD luMic blgiwsy leading
b .Su, Il silil tho province
3d Ar wLeihtr, under the
.lHE.'.u,o. Il TIE gHa-, such
.s u..Nas ID suite ent COM
.I q H" l.'t.s duty 10 give
0l tWtly arulug OF tbs np
H. v.u,c lu said eros sing.
uy tciuPrN1i defend ants
.-rg ,t. hIitl Dr Paryis
.r.yIU r.a1 q patl,c
t.I lc care, Ga
. rirs-slaages,
Hn nchar e
.... a4trI tic
n ul.. n".r 4-h, bat
.a. wts luilly
.... -., ,.i ,i.a
'=...@ ... Vi
.". uI. =.t.y
~ H. H..4 = Df.
y 's. . .r II TO oo
~ tt .. r,ls yas
a=H .-acr Goa.
ua'4.B ald
0a-t iG rAfv s
t gCt on on Is.
attributed to tis
dseGmG lhato was
Jr uniifaiH4.
sc that DE-. Paw 8
inilj travelling upon
mis- county, and ttat
any ur ,ta terY5n'a
Ele negligent act ~
ether caused or 10 d.
All earsn hil 3 h,
aata rcettt5y .Hfa4e
that pa taryis Haa
@5li.euca tie drHnl-
bt jmy by pftpo.tiur-
toat Dr.. faglis was
".=oi ordinary care and
aadiy, that such want Of
1 ctg la on his p9rt
I'd 10 produces BIS deajh.
s.c' or want oil oI1l-
.4 'un apaa the past of
Hrt d.a rtitle tire pla'aiin
Is were such thai tut
90 or mt OF ordinary
the nislarlune c3u i
Hl.c1.
ball flnd a verd ct for
'n in Il -eFsing thu DANA.
H estimate the reasonable
t4 lie Of the dtraa1cd
give tho p'aiutiH such
..ges, rot only tor pAst
.cu prospective damages
HAy mud that fle has sut-
aleF as lhe direct consc-
Aaath OF the said Dr. PaF-
p addressed the jury and
}'ij O'clock. lIo was FOL
-. Massey, Esq iof the
lib submitted the following
'-sttuu:
mt by its attorneys prays
,aet tEo jary as follows:
i'3s TIC Jury believes from
lie accident Which resulted
lot Dl. Paryls WAS dne solely
a@ce OF the defendant can
~ .oenablc the plaintiff to recoy.
y, .ase n must appear to tho salts.
.. ,'' tie jury that tho deceased
atalh by reason OF the negli.
ile defendant company, aud
.,o. ''spselce on his part contributed
: ,' 't.'. was the duty OF Dir. Paryis fl
The railway crossing a, Frog,
y " H.. T.. ''Ailltd in the evidence, to exor
II 'a'd and caution to avoid tn,
~ ~. "ateh resulted in his death. and
,.a ,hl carefully to look and lister
crg. ~ ,aehlng trains before attempti nQ
p I'M, '.v railway, ard II he neglected
n, I'm MS duty he was contribu-
,,i.a4 gent and the Jury must fiud
ba, ss lg T. dat in this suit.
bS I% Il lhe Jury shall find from the
N ge ,s' mat DR.. Parvls was familiar
rurt,,. '',e ,fo, ling at Frogtown and with
1 a dounulh. 5, he was bound TO cxer.
ssinas s,as oil care aud caution before
n p.,, thh railway tracks comm men.
is,' "'u us knowledge thereof. and
d. : 10 10 avoided and his omission
tor, va me Jury SO flnd) was con.
oyc,r rnesngence which would defeat
srS Sy !. ~ the plaintiff in this suit and
In, T,y q must ba for the defendant,
H. H.. II The jury shall be Satisfied
he evidence that ,ha sa.s