Oxford Democrat. [volume] (Paris, Me.) 1833-1933, 1889-02-26
Respectfully yours.
JoHN Y. SwAsEN.
supeme Judicial Court.
FuGrIHr Tim. 1889


CuANnLTN 0AELASp, Jdser
SANuu X. CANrTE. L,trar1aa
W A hAEEows. Ms'sengff
Ga Monlsy siisrnooa the case Of CsJ'
loa Ro-s We James Mayoonbsll. -hies
bad been assigned Tor the previous We'd
ns,d.y BAT .fisr-.ids rsssslsned fo'
Mood.y. ~s, taken Up Tai' -s' a.
action TO recover Pos.s...oa Of parcel o.
lad situated IN Bethel. The s'idsse'
as slmo., sniir,ly docsmsn,siy. ,h'
ora testimony being very brief. Th'
Coar, dir,e'sd verde, fof the plaintiff
Dsicsd.nt sled exception. and The es.'
20. io,-.rd 70 ID. l.- court. A T.
Hsuick ior plaintiff snd ;. ?. Gi5.os
icr dsfsnd.n,
The follSving divorce cases we're
h.srd
RlI.nas ". Kao-lion. libell.n;, W.
Charles X Kaoslioa. Csuss alleged.
sfo.. and soafrnsd habit. q ia,oi'esiiou
.nd dsssrtioa. Coa,inusd &c farther
no,ics. X. A. Frye Zoe liesllsnt.
Margaret 4 hgn,r,... hbsll.n,. W.
Geors- Hun,rrs. Divorce teefe,d for
su.f ds.sr,ioa. A. X. Walker tof libel
lsn;.
Ga Tuesday morning the case Of
G~org, h staples, e.. a.. v. Ou' Falls
Pulp Company ~. tAksa up. This
case "a, oas u considerable imPorisnes
nd ons srritirs god deal o.. inter,.t
The plsintiE,. lumber operators q, C.h'
ten. ln;rodsesd oofre.poadencs ishdins
20 prove eoar.et bet-een iksm.sl'e.
nd dsisndsn, company November lot,
lsss. uadsr Which they ssre 70 eel %
dsisnd.n, 200 900 ZEE, hsmlock log', 10
b delivered -ithia thirty day. =, Liver
NOE F,ns. "to b. sealed a, ws talked.
Pl.iniif, ia,rodseed ,s,tim5asy 70 ,ho-
that the talk. -hieh 81 bs,-esn NJ
Hugh J. Chsbolm. q Portland. the s.n-
sfal manager ofths company, add Staples
-As,o ihssf,ei ,ha, the scale .boald b
straight and SQUAD once insvery % tec' .aad
also in,rodgesd testimony 20 ,ho- TIA, al
The timber s1csp, about 90 pieces. -.'
TUNED over Frsuch Falls. above dsisnd
ants mill. into ~hs, %. claimed 10 b
he a,aiias ground o. the dsiend.n,
company. -hsa zee formed aud prevented
t5.,ing The lcgs down sgsins, defend
ants boom. Pl.iniif, claimed that 'hi.
%. I. proper delivery. and Staples ts.,i-
sd ths, be informed T. r. Hofns, -ko
bad charge Of receiving the logs foe the
dsfssd.ai that be % considered ii.snd that
be further stated 70 bin that II there "a.
any ek.neh Coz any question sboa, the
delivery be. Staples, would pa, on 20
nsn snd cut q chanel through the ice
and pl.c. every log dO-a ssains, the
boom before nishi; thu, Horne replied
that be did 20, kao- whether Chisholm
-ogld consider il delivery. bu, ih., 10
cut chanel throash the ice would
-saksn the dam and sndsnssr the boom
and be did 20; Ssh him 10 do IL. 10
-hieh BE-. SiAplss). then replied thu, De
-ogli lssve them a. they we're. Which
be did. The boom sOoa sftsr-srd. gave
say and large portion Of the logs we've
lost.
The defendant admitted that the
scale "a. 20 BE- .,rsigh, and sound once
IN every Is feet. bat eOniendsd, and To-
uodueed testimony TO .ho-, that the
scale -as 70 Be eowPaied /. the Ioz.
-srs counted 10 their sor,ing. gap a. tbs
mill and delivered into their aide boon
Mr.. Horne testified that bis reply 10
Staples. when the latter suggested cut
tins the channel thrOgge the iee aud run
nitg down the lOg., -. that II be.
staples. should Cut . channel and run
The log. through they would certainly
- taken care o.. bl, that IL would be
useless 10 Gu, sh,anel through as the
zee would collapse and close u; aud that
Staple. then elected 10 leave the logs a.
they we're Defsndabt also claimed 10
rsooap Tor lo.. snd damages, aud fOr sx-
pensss upon that Poriion Of the log.
-hieh ~sre saved BY the company.
The case occupied Tuesday and Wed
ns.dsy. ard vas very closely contested
After being out sbol, al hour aud .
half The Jury returned verde, FOE the
plaintiff Cor sl636.47. including an item
Of SIS IS Coz surveying. the fall smoani
claimed, Nth interest. Defendant hlsd
exceptions and . motion fer . nes trial.
and the case goes forward.
JP. ssassy for pl.in,if. and George
d. Bi.bes and A. 4 Hsrriek FOE defend
ant.
The jury %. excused finally Thursday
morning. The Coar, vas occupied dur
ing the forenoon in the disposition Of in
terloeatOry matters.
Pred Russell. libellani. vs. Anrsha X
Rassell. Divorce deereed fof utter de-
sertiOn J.P. S-ssey foe hbsllan,.
In the ease Of Frank p. Cummings e,
al W. Justine w. Everett aud Gsriis NJ
Everett. Which "a. submitted to the pre-
aiding Justice. . decision VAS catered
jadsnsa, fOr PI.iaiid. exceptions sllo-sd
and Hlsd.
This vas an action on . promissory
note tOf sS+s7. The note vss sisnsd