The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1889-11-19

Columbia 4 Paget Sound rallr0ad. along
sise west side 81 eoafh Ninth, - Washing
ton gtrees. ard westward along Washing
ton street to soagh Third. The Eisctric
Light eosnpany il 20 move in poles IN
order 70 riFs the Western Union route
clear OF electric light wires, and that TIE
Electric Light company viii leave the
tgestera Tnioa IN nndIstarbsd possession
of the route mentioned, and viii not hsflld
is line s1p0n the wess side 0f south Third
street. between Washington street and
Yesser avenue. d consideration of the
FOREGOING. the Wessern union agreed 20
wIthdraw from al opposition % tbs Seattle
Electric Light company occupying Sorsth
Eighth. Main and Commercial streets
along the route Of the Western Unions
present line The Western Union further
ag-eed % furnish ali necessary material for
the construction OF the I.ne referred To-
4 EErEEvRs APPOINTED.
gait was brought by ]. G. Boyd. the
wholesale nest dealer, against G. II. FRYE
and Charles Brain and tie First National
bank Of Seattle The plaintiff alleges that
he Is a partner in the butcher firm o Eoyd,
Frye & Bruhn. known as the Seattle Mar
ket, and thas for q long time past the de-
PENDANTS have endeavored 70 force him 70
retire from the business. OF which each
have an equal share. lie further alleges
that the defendants have refused to give
him an account OF the receipts and dis
bursenents OF the business, and have re-
fused him all information. he asks that
Fl. NJ Shaw be appointed receiver pending
The dissolution OF the partnership and
inst distribution of the assets. The First
National bank Is made party 70 the action
by virtue OF having on deposit co-partner-
ship funds IN the individual names OF the de-
PENDANTS. 4 restraining order was asked ana
granted prohibiting the bank from paying
the defendants any money pending the
courts decision. The receiver was also APP
pointed as prayed for.
INSANITY THE CAUSE Feb DIVORCE.
Suit was brought by J. IzeIa against
Sarah lem, praying the court TO grant a
divorce and give him the custody of his
four children. alleging that the defendant
is insane and confined in an asylum at st.
Louis, No.. and that she Is not tit person
TO conduct the bringing up Of their children.
ANOTHER MATRIMONIAL MIsFIT.
Ellen T. Owen brought suit for divorce
against her husband, Daniel NJ. Owen,
alleging cruelty and brutality on his part.
She prays the court for divorce and de-
cree giving her the custody Of her child and
reasonable support for both.
DAMAGES FOB roRcIBLE DETENTION.
A suit was brought by A. W. Hawks
against Archie q. Stetson, the plaintiff
alleging that the defendant ordered a
policeman to unlawfully arrest him on
November s, 1850. He further SAYS that it
was done out of pure malice and without
just cause, and that be was detained against
bis viii for one-half hour. He asks
81 500 damages for his forcible detention.
SUIT or AN OLD NOTE.
A. L. Day brought suit against j. III.
Loughead for the recovery of $3.50 .96, on q
promissory note, which the defendant made
and delivered 10 Livingstone & Co.,
at Globe City, Arizona. in January. 1898,
for certain valuable consideration. Liv-
ingstone g. Co. transferred the note to
the plaintiff The note has never been
paid and therefore the plaintiff asks judg-
ment in the above sum, together with in
terest and costs.
AeTIoss TO RgcoyER MONEY.
A suit was brought by Fawcett & Bros.
against w. Il. Hoar, for s239.25, balance
due on a promissory note. issued by the
defendant December Ii. 1883. Judgment
is asked In the above sum.
suit was brought by the Mechanics
Mil and Lumber Company against Owen
Thomas for the recovery of S529f2. due on
pFomissory note for building material.
IuAssn.aekS - awless4 In, aha ahavo esssxa