Daily Republican., 1889-10-09
FIFYH. edition


mt "a
consideration OF the license au'ii ",,a 10
Levi .. Bird, Esq, appeared ia Lssan
OF Michael J. Sharkey, who sppl ed N.a
License Tor b0ttllng establishment !,
Harrison and Pleasant streets. n "
stated that shnrkey had dislg,e1 ~, w
place OF business and liceuse at I.,pc ~ ~
avenue and Franklin sire, mi n.
Chief Justice said that 1t was bad Ivy Wy
ness, and one that could not b, tgeoS,,'
cd BY the Court for men Ia ,ecb,s
license and then sell out on snprn,.'
Mr.. Bird, and also Mr.. Vandsa,s
urged that this was not an applicants
. saloon. and that no LIQUOR wSn JI L. !.
sold on the premises. '4 ="
William 4. Lyman, Etq. appe,r1 f..
William Mailer, who bought sbsrSs.s
place at Lancaster avenue AMI FI,ntn.
street, aud was refused at ilcls,, ,s'
said that he would withdraw the spplI,,
ton. "fF'''a
The next case taken up wa, that a,
George w. Griffith at Eleventh ~
Thatcher streets, who has been relu,.5.
license three or four times. lie wa, ,Aa
resented BY Walter Bacon, Esu ~.
made an urgent appeal in his bsb,u
The Court said that It was not dl,na.,
10 grant license 10 n place tb,t ia
been refused, and Mr.. Picket .tronsIs
objected to the Court giving lie m,,,,
any consideration.
When the application Of William
Brady for the frequently turned dowp
houte at Eleventh and Church stre,l,
was taken up, Mr.. Pickett presented
long remembrance against tie apple,.
ton being granted. He also sa'i I'M
as Brady had already obtained licenses
for several places and then sold them ou,,
" looked 10 though be was acting Al,
license broker. He also called attention
10 the hct that license had already ham
refused to this house, when appI.e,Iop
had been made by others fully az tepu,l
BILE a. Mr.. Brady.
The applicant was not representa- h,
counsel aud made an appeal to lie coun
IN which he denied that he WIS eps,p,i
In obtaining licenses aud thea selling
out. and explained why be bad disposed /
Of the other places.
The application OF Philip AmboId via
taken up, when Messrs. Ward and Ilsye,.
who appeared for Anbold, stated that
this application was made Tor a hotel
containing thirty-tuo rooms, located At
Z eventh street and Railroad avenue
| The application was opposed by Mr.. Il
Pickett, who stated that a saloon was
not needed 10 that neighborhoOd, and
also that license could no, he granted, /
as the house is not yet finished. Alter
consulting with Mr.. Bradley. the owner
and builder, Mr.. Ward stated to No
court that as he learned the house Is net
4 uaN .tae. L..
guests he would withdraw the appiel-
tion.
As Nicholas Jenney. who applied fors
license at No. 100 East Water street. ha,
died, the application was withdrawn.
The case OF Thomas l.. Mousley, d
Elliott avenue and Market street, whose
{ application has been repeatedly refused
was again taken up. when VI, pdcEet
said that he had nothing further to ura
against It than what had been Fail In The
past. As the applicant was not repre-
sented there was nothing presented 10 BIZ
behalf.
Daniel Dougherty's application ors
license for q saloon at No. OIL W1t SeF-
enth street was withdrawn.
The following applications from drug.
glsts were passed without opposition
g. q. McKeever, Maryland Avenu: and
Linden street.
I. b. Cartmel, northwest c1;nu sIA
and Madison streets.
John J. G ,llagher & Brother, No. 100
Market strett.
John J. Gallagher u Brother. No. 9.Ol
Market street.
r. W. Fem, No. 2i5 West Eight
street. ..
West Street Pharmacy, northeast COZ
ner Second and West stress
George 7. Williams, northwest corne
Tenth and Adams streets.
Jacob 8. Beetem, Seventh and Marke
streets.
Philip II. Wood, northwest come
Tenth aud Market streets.
James NJ. grimm, No. $50 Nes, Fonfl
street.
Hertel & Co., northeast corner FOuhl
and Walnut streets.
Mr.. Hayes called the attention OF ID
court to that part OF the new liquor la
. which provides that one-hai OF To
. signers TO an application f(r liGeas
9 shall be freehulders. He inquired II /
Y was necessary that the properly should
y located In the ward In which tie signe
resided. The Chief Justlce said that q
D Judge Houston was not present no va
: not prepared TO give an opinion, bit b
thought bimself that tho property Of
, freehold Bigner must be located in ih
ward where he lived, as the object Of lh
} law was to obtain the names Of suOsisa
tai property owners 10 the vicinity Of
,, place for which application is made :,
show that saloon In tho neighoOrhoS'
lie a public necessity.
This was the Last business transact q
and at 10.46 o'clock court adolFat'
until o o'clock tomorrow morHl.g.