Delaware gazette and state journal. (Wilmington, Del.) 1883-1902, 1889-12-12

mhulhOu street STATION, and always found
1t we'll lighted. He was also there one
niRnt recently. and even after the electric
lights were extinguished was able TO find
his way to Madison street without any
trouble.
Charles W. Kennedy, chief clerk for tho
defendant company in 1886 said he always
found the station well. lighted, aud did not
think there was any trouble In finding
Madison street.
DIR. Thomas s. Brown testified that about
IL years ago ne attended Mrs. Wallace, the
plaintih, who bad beeu Rored by a COW,
and was badly Injured In the abdomen.
On cross examination DR.. Brown said he
did not think that injury had anything to
DO with her present condition, when Mr..
BIRD turned TO Mr.. Bradford and said "In
the name OF God, what did you call him
for2'
This was the last witness called by the
defence and Mr.. Bird proceeded with his
witnesses In re6uttal Maggie McGlynn, a
| daughter OF tho plaintiff said she lived
WITH her mother while she resided at Rock
land. She had never aeen her do any
| washing or scrubbing.
Hugh Wallace, a sou OF the plalntiif, tes-
titled that when bis mother went to market
she WIS Obliged to walk 70 duPonts Station
to take the train for this city, but she had
| sometimes came IN wagon. He always
accompanied her, as he knew she was
unable to carry the baskets. He was posi-.
tive that she had not carried basket Of
marketing while she lived at Rockland.
Andrew Sanborn, Esq, was called to tes-
thy to the conversation which took place
| with DR.. Smiley Mt his Office In Camden,
N j., on Thanksgiving Day, but Mr., Dad
ford objected TO his evidence being received
| on the ground that he was one of the at.
torneys engaged in the case. After an argu.
lnent by counsel the majority OF the court
| decided that he was not u competent Wit
ness, and Mr.. Bird noted an exception.
DR.. Negendank testified that he had no
doubt whatever that II th6ro was cancer.
Gus affection in the blood OF the plaintiff
| II would be FASTENED 10 crisis by fall
! DR.. Howard Ogle testified to the Same ef.
feet, but qualified Eis testimony by saying
that cancer conld only be developed by d
rundown condition OF the System.
DR.. Leonard klt'lnger WAS certain that
] II the cancarous affection was In the sys'
| TEN II would be developed by q fall or shock
Drs. Tomlinson, Curtis, Patterson. Rle
and Winner gave similar testimony, und
| eRrh was subjected to q severe cross,
examination by Mr.. Bradford for the pur.
pose OF showing that the cancer must have
been In the plaintiffs system pre- ious n
the accident, and would huvo been devel
oped II the Incident had never occurred.
| AT O'Clock court took recess until 2.3i
| O'Clock.
In the case dt Mary Wallace vs.. this
w. 81 N. Railroad Company, in th,
afternoon, Stephen j. Bnckus was re-
called and testified that in 1888, while
employed by the company 80 frtigh
conductor, ha was at the Madison stree
station very freqlsntly at night, but hai
never seen any right inyide the station
he did not even know that lamp wa
there.
Elk Officer Harry o. Welch teatidei
thst while ho vas on the police force ii
1856 and 1856 he WAS very frequently u
Madison strest station ia the evening
and while he frequently noticed tn,
lamp burning outside bad never seen on,
Inside the station. Joseph Sinnex testi
fed similarly.
William Fordham was in the room
when the witness Tutty stated that b
was with him the night OF the accident
when he returned the lamp 10 the station
The witness declared that such was no
the case, as no went to the station b,
himself
William s. Shannon, On employee Mt thu
west yard OF the p, W. Il B. RAILROAD
Company said he frequently passed thu
Madison street station at night in 1886
and on two occssionsshad seen the boy
put out the light as soon as the trail
started.
This closed the testimony on boil
sides and at 3 20 O'Clock Mr.. Bird com
menced the argument for the plaintiff OF
tie legal points OF the case.
at 30 o'clock court adjourned until
O'Clock yesterday morning.
All the judges were present when cour
met at 0 o'clock yesterday morning, ant
Immediately after the opening Mr.. Bird re
sumed argument for the plaintiff In tn
case OF Mary Wallace Va. the W. & N. Rail
road Company. He continued presenting
the law TO the court, and when he closed
Attorney. general Biggs, who is also assoel
Hted In the case, made the opening arHu
ment to the jury. At O'Clock court tool
recess until $50 In the afternoon.