The Iola register. [volume] (Iola, Allen County, Kansas) 1875-1902, 1889-04-26

the defense of ne country. Her reply
came promptly: THE country needs
you and you may 60" Three times
after that, before the struggle
ended. my mother was called upon
to surrender other sons, young
or than myself. to the country. The
younger celebrated his fifteenth birth
day as private soldier in the ranks of
that grand command then defending
Nashville under the lead of General
Geo. H Thomas The patriotism and self
sacrifice OF that mother were greater
than mine or that of any of her sons.
She deprived herself OF support, and
sent her sons into different armies and
fields, so that she was never free from
anxiety for one or the other of US sup
posed to be for the time in peril The
soldiers know how much they owed to
their mothers, wives. sisters and sweet
hearts. No. Mr.. Chairman, you will
not deny this petition. because a per-
son. himse exempt from military duty
on two grounds at least, and who was
of fighting age and did not fight in our
last struggle for the life of the nation.
objects that woman must not vote be-
cause she can not fight" If there is no
stronger argument than that to urge.
the opposition had better stand aside
and let this measure become law. 1
would remind these clergymen that the
women support their churches. The
public duty assigned them in church
work are not unlike those the ballot
would impose upon them. and when
rightly understood are fully as disa-
greeable.
ut does not necessarily follow that
women shall perform jury duty because
they are given municipal suffrage. But
II they do / shall have no fear that
their verdict will be more prejudiced
than are those men. l believe you
will find them far more inclined to re-
gard their oath, and their verdicts will
be more in accordance with substantial
justice than those you now take from
men. / am sure there will be much
less compromising of verdicts that the
jury may get home to dinner or for the
night. Let me tell you case which l
knew in Virginia some years since.
Twelve white freeholders had been
impaneled to try a negro for an alleged
offense, the punishment for which was
Imprisonment for term not exceeding
eighteen years In that State the jury
not only decides upon the guilt or in
nocence of the prisoner. but also deter
mines the punishment in all cases where
the statute gives discretion. In this
case. full history of which 1 learned
from members Of the jury. to be used to
support an application for pardon. two
members of the jury believed the de-
PENDANT innocent, and wished to bring
in a verdict Of not guilty; the other
ten believed the man guilty, and
differed about the term Of Imprisonment,
from one who would have sent him for
one year to another who wished to inn
prison him for eighteen. The jury DELHI
Grated long. The court was about to
lock them up for the night, when they
speedily agreed upon a verdict bring
ing the prisoner in guilty and sending
him to prison for two years. l do not
believe that two women who believed a
person innocent would have yielded
thus easily, finding him guilty of a
State-prisOn offense. am sure we
should have more verdicts Of guilty in
cases where disagreements and verdicts
of not guilty are now rendered, if wo-
men were on the jury. Then one
reverend gentleman is very much afraid
that the boss in politics would have
his power increased if women voted. 1
do not believe it. l am sure it would
be the reverse, and as this is matter
of speculation and opinion, perhaps
mine is as good as his. The men have
generally made pretty bad mess of
the government of our cities. l doubt
if it is easy to make them worse than
they have been. feel certain, from
what / saw on the last election-day,
that to enfranchise the women will do
more than any other one thing / know
of to promote good government in our
cities"