The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1889-11-01
SCRIP MEN APPEAL
Exceptions 10 the Receivers
Valentine Rulings.
TnEIs gaIEF oF osJEcTloNs.
The ransnassslonef 81 sise Isad osaes
e.u ~. Receiver sra.s Eeeeive
msKes scrip fIElngs-

MEke~ scrip Fiafngs-
There w. new rhass q TIE scrip b'ssi'
rgass neeserse1 - tke lard oissee yesferi ~
~ - entering Of ak appeals against tie
~sezrs, ssesssssyn refusing tie apps lcafsohs e
sac Rzssns!ne men. re local l2nd ofees
AsaSsag thsf tae filings aeFe wlEain TIE
eEsv Ess. The axgansess q fho aRpe&A,
A. xgssn asrswlth presents 8 Gss Sea teAt-
rrss losske8 np0a a. favorable b he va
entfas nssrs. nAo are a. sangaine ~ ever
~ mgtsesss snaoess. While little = beinz
.af4 ~ TIE advocates u Mekes scF1p, Efsss .
TOO. are sanvafne. and aFe taking further
stecs = Strengthen their eiasms both here
and IS Washington.
SIX AFFEAIg TAgNS.
Sir apps&is we're YESTERDAY fled At the
ard osssce against Ehe decision Of tie q a.
aifses rejecting the applications 10 lie Nai-
sEtsne srrfp On ths ground that The ioca-
TONS xefe wltkin tie city limits. The aIs-
psahs were entered by the following pes-
sons n l. Basr, Charles II. Baker.
efeerge " Trenlbie and three IS James
kass9n. The text II the hries and argu-
rieai sg&inst the decisaon 81 the local iaiad
once Is e. ioiI0vs;
ExraFxgosB r. Tax BgeEsIoE.
cha Registers kHd feeelseF erFsi IN travelling
outside ol Lae asesras II tlseIF efiCs ia making
sag Amsiaxs f EaEt ia the case a. al under their
fnasfues5 ons IL tie records Of tseif Office ere
elsas II any adverse Claims 20 fhs iF2fts sought
81 b. saieged sheir aatg wes eeahns slEapiy %
tie lsssaaee a eerslaestas and Rotation Of ths
q lagx 90 fAesE FacCT8s.
They CO n0t pseten1 KS she rejection 81 our
apylleatloas that The lseG + nos patlsc land OF
that Ehsrn are adverse claims urged 20 49 ey the
cts al seattle aaaef iAe t0ssfasaip lsw. oE -
any 8aftes ans pab.ie % private land lsa OF tue
listed ssAtes.
Ths register ana Feeeivorerged ia holds - tlsat
me tracts embraced ~ this entity b @ithfa tAe
Incorporated city - SEATTLE.
The lisstts oi tbs city q seattle e. prescribed
by the last ansnaneni 20 the city ehnfter wees
gssasad ~ tbs terrilsFssi Legislature aud ap-
psafe 81 February T. IsSe section o. this law
IA hsra afloic8
Sc ssbEt that by the vety terms o. this act
esablsshlaE the boa8 1AsGes o. tug ely
Dawamlsa river is made the western BOUNDARY
- the e.ty. and Sc are prepared 10 prose thai
the hsBueI al tae buwAmish lies 20 me east
waftl Of the land songht 80 be euicrod. and ibst
tAls land "a tass excluded ffom thu CITY, limits
IL mas aaa possibly will lse usgea that - the
terms 1t the ses All 81 sections 3. and :, iu
townsbtp ~ north Of range east, are Included
ianf soaght to na .rnieged is with IN Que or tie
other Of these sections We submit that the
rrierenea a. the 40 slons means Onlg such por
ton Of tbsss sections IS AsYe already bCEu sur
veye6 IN spsaking II SECTIONS p + And = town
ship a north oi fHnEe east. e. distinctive cub
divisions Of land. reference must necessarily be
limited 20 the fractional sections sIrpafiy 20
Originated in trace OF the aiied states laad
oaiee There we're snoh fractional seesiuus al
FrEay Ia existence, and within The boundaries
Otherwise described ffnly one constitution can
- made of the act whleh viii haFmonike tbe
sppasent dts gepaneies aud that that Nilcs
She legislature assiguate1 the western boundary
~ Seattle ths bawEmlsh river. aud At the
same time sought 10 include sections s. and :
that the legislature intended g. refer soleiy 10
zoe fractional sections 20 designated. and which
Hefe wftAin ihese boundaries. AMI uot 20 some
possible sns future complete sections which
will not b. IN existence iagai divisions 81 the
public domala untii tbr public surveys are *
Traded over thsstFaets ia controversy aud which
wonld Coms auiside q these boundaries. No
other Interpretation IL possible ethoat luxoly
ins Inc SCI ia otscnrity aud contradictions.
TIE register sf:d receiver erred IN holding THAT
Janis within she corporate limits nf The eity al
Seattle were necessarily exsiudcd from tue O{eI
alton ~ the grant 10 Valentine. where 40 quez-
lions Of occupation o. appropriation were ia.
valFed No tuundatlnn cas- te fcRnd in law fox
eifoet snd on that ground selsly can be foanf
II is true some precedence might look in that
direction. hnt these dec siona have hetB reyersed
nj modified So EFcaf extent since they " ere
rendered TIE register ard receiver rely priu
elpally on he Chicago csses 90 xuppoet their
theory = Corps l. q, q. - Al examination
81 that as " ID snnw That the decision 81 kacra
isfy seharz vas HeI based upau the tacstaas the
isn8 wAs withln tbs limits ~ an incorporated
city That point Nas not touched upon, Ia
fat 10 reasons whatever were gwen by the
heRafaole SECRETARY iar bis refusal 70 permit
the entry. In she Seattle ease r L. D. - the
chicago case was uted a. precedent - fulee5
the eustY Bat g. viii Dc remembered thar a.
ter tiwe applications 81 lgeafe Valentine scrEn
we're refused within To- corporate lirairs ~ seat
tie, Ferians homestead aaa pFeemP lion claims
VEN re- sete8 ga the same EtouBd. since thea
fuller Interpretations have hesn msde ~ the
township Al 81 Starch 2. iSSs. and We lbtuk tho
settled law noa 60 be thai Incorporation OF 4
town with ii7aits "a excess ~ q - acres viii net
har pys emptian ee}ry within said limt.s on lansf
nei astus'iy settled ugon, aRd 8ssd fof business
sud auulelpAl Purpose. waii Lake eases 4
Corp =. E.. T. stS T. a., 81; T. g.. co.
1aefy can be nD qssssson under taess 30.
eisiens that 81 gAis frsef we've surveYea aerteu}.
tara lAad ii wpal1 be salseet 60 csay anfcf
the pyn caption laws ey0u fi 3g Wego within the
iisa}ts of ~e8stlH Vita how wHoh mere force
eaa eissu - urgea "a jt uusieF ne set Of
Apgi s lsse, whls r. ealv reserves eeeut9ed, Az.
profflstea and taireFa lAnds tsuH sac Grant fo
Nsiensgae,
TIE REGISTER aai receiver lie pot pretend taat
she isaa = uItNfAi ~ Is aeruusast les status -
puhltc IAh4 has oeeu ss{tlea rs the easays :.
s.oaef, Tae gn}y puies le't 10 thsm so oaustsas
was ths qSeassa OF appFoPs ss3oi, aud thels,se
rtsien eae on3E sad pssslbe hasis ~ sac the
cry 3hss size tkteUstea Of tAc hu1sss 81 a. tpfae.
ressiei s.Fy over tHe pubic dnmaia cousutates
So appropriation as 6. Bar heFc thes are mex
WsSa seeisiap e iho hogagabse tecgagsfg ~er
se,afy ksfkwossa. Sc tss case SO flu So Ry-
Watef 1 4, n 81 bed {n express terHrs that
tsse extension - sac nsgfs Of q eigy over Public
ls,Hls 8t4 nut constitute ae ~sprTupf atiaa o.
aaf permitted the setsy ~ Fortesaa5a stffp
whiea ell eajy tale ''aaApPzopF iAn.ss
uthiBsha aSa5.s at seattle
lar sitsssiian = = pseaiisg eau- ae are ths,
sale r1a5uhss fa tts Ba6et rs Tinted stasek
fae stAlaz ol thass RH3s is besa settled sy she
osPsFtFaeut \ taoF the s3tv ~ seattle ngy aHy
ciAiHsats excess ourselves. Are hefc ggrses q
t-Al@ HfA~f sax ssd isw, nEtsge af pstgxfe No
uaetEsess SO sseg hsva aeen h~.sehs 49, Before
tas seFrf AIS eg<s ets ga,ltag Iof aacfsf -.
sat sea thay tssfEs eega37 g ire fseo7s.. 81 t.se
gae@ $50 ai ihs8 casee p aaa tbeegy go Is hiaA
e. gress $3.50 satv. }a ss-istfss at ne tFsf ss,ass
oi sae Sc assusaeg sa3 a5 sAesr e4u.ess .a.saa
usss
Register Ezs5 ss54 thst abe arresls uoss,4
tsr .eFaArsssj sc eHco io tae general land
eslsse 3a Wa hsneion-
Assr*as Nk18ss.Nr krrt}r,Fsox.
fbg~a Nas &Heshcg app &0oa to ta-ste
Na.ea}ac seTsF ~ tas l&aa as.s.o Te5lr-iav
rsae ay pass4 y NakseF. seq. lae aaftb.
wVs sgsrser e2 TIRE southeast 1aar5sr sf
=e,es9n A. tawashsp 81 naetb. ~s-.rs Z esst
ae fsegsea seWrysee sasty sc-ee. aas 3
fw-ytrt wss ,egesi iav ihe ssaas.