Western Kansas world. [volume] (WaKeeney, Kan.) 1885-current, 1889-05-18
DISTRICT COURT DOCKET.
Term Opens on Monday, May az,

Cowick, for state; F Danford. for defense
State vs. Geo BEEN; robbery; Cowsck
for 8; II D Hollister, for d.
State VS. VIM BEEN; gambling; Cowick
for 9; Danford, for d.
State vs. Geo BEEN; gambling; Cowick
for S; Danford, for d.
State VS. John BEEN; gambling; Cowick
for 8; Danford, for d.
State VS. M W BEEN; gambling; Cowick
for s; Danford and Hollister, for d.
State VS. N " BEEN; selling into1icat.
ing liquors; Cowick, for. state; Danford
and Hollister, for d.
State VS. NJ Robinson; false pretense
Cowick, for S; Lee Monroe, for d.
State VS. N W BEEN and q N BEEN
injunction; Cowick, for s; Hollister, for d
State vs. D Countryman; assault and
battery and mayhem; Cowic.1 and Dan.
ford, for s; A Nelson and d Rathbone
for d.
State VS. Enos Click and Adeline
Phelps; illegal cohabitation; Cowick, for g.
State VS. R Wilson; gambling; Cowick,
for s.
State VS. A T Morgan; embezzlement;
Cowiek and Danford, for s.
State VS. A T Morgan; embezzlement;
Cowick and Danford, for S.
State VS. A 7 Morgan; embezzlement;
Cowick and Danford, for s.
State, ex rel, A ] Harlan, asst atty
general for Wallace co, Kan. VS. Frank
Harold, " d Purse and r B Christian;
nuisance; A Harlan, for s.
NJ w BEEN VS. B W S Huffaker; execu-
ton; Monroe, for plaintiff.
G j Ferris vs G V Deiterich and G C
Alden; replevin; Monroe, for p; Rathbone,
for dfts.
J N Ostrander VS. S A Klein; breach of
contract; Monroe, for p; Danford, for d.
W Rohlfng & Co VS. Carper, Frymire
& Co; debt; A D Gilkeson, for p; G W
Gray and Danford, for d.
John Shetterly VS. Fl Lane and o R
Brown; accounting OF partners; Harlan
and Gilkeson, for p; Monroe and e A
McMath, for d.
Wade Warren VS. Geo Baker, sheriff;
damages; Levitt & Sturman and Monroe,
for p; Danford, for d.
Assignment of Porter & Fulton; Lee
Monroe, for p.
r G Cooper VS. Frank G Willard; mo-
ton to reta1 costs; Cowick, for p; Hollis
ter, for d.
J W Olmstead VS. W s Harrison and J
A Nelson; debt; Harlan, for p; Danford,
for q.
J J Shaffer, G A Coe aud G D Shaffer
VS. III III Lindsay and A E Nickel; debt;
Monroe for p; Nelson and Danford, for d.
The Lansing Lumber Co VS. E G.
Thomas, Eli Sheldon, Hill P Wilson and
M 7 Urngot; debt-suit on bond; Hollis
ter, for plaintiff; Gilkeson, for d.
Jacob Shell VS. Annie Shell; suit to set
aside deed; Danford, for p; Berry and
Smith, for d.
D 7 Snider VS. D Shenk; debt; Mon
roe, for p; Hollister, for d.
T G Willard VS. Ann G Ostrander;
breach OF contract; Hollister, for p; Dan
ford, for d.
Am Buttonhole, Overseaming & S M
Go vs. " B Kritchfeld; debt; Monroe, for
p; Hollister, for d.
Assignment of NJ Young.
Wyler, Akerland & Co VS. Peter Robi-
doux; debt; A Bennett, for p.
T J r Perry vs. The q P Ry Co; dam
ages; G N Banks, for p; D G Lockwood,
For d.
Adeline Phelps vs. Edward Phelps; d.
Vorce; Danford, for p.
j e Hammer 6 Co vs. J w Wilkin:
debt; Reeder &c Reeder, for p; Hollister,
Tor d.
Leopold Simon and James Mayer, as L
Simon & Co; debt; Monroe, for D; VIM
Roberts, for d.
w Farwell & Go VS. G W Doering and
3 A Doering; attachment; W P Mont
3OAAiSAyt AL T., IL L 0StCtud duO NAM. |
Done, for d.
John Weeks Lumber Co VS. G. W Deer
ng and E ADoering; attachment; Banks,
or p; Rathbone, for d.
A E Mckenzie VS. G W Doering and E |
4 Doering, partners as Doering & Doer-
ng; attachment; Monroe, for p.
Hattie E Barr VS. School District No
-, Trego county; debt; Hollister and Har-
an, for p; Monroe, for d.
W E Tindall VS. B G Hurlburt; debt.
8 l. Nelson VS. Louis Williams; fore
losure; Monroe, for p.
James Walsh Mercantile Co VS. WDt
Purse; attachment; Geo Outcalt and J B
Gamble, for p; Danford, for d.
Bruce Furbeck vs. q P Railway Co:
amages; Hollister and John E Heesin.
Or p; A L Williams and r w Blair, for d.
Assignment of Merchants Bank, of
Wallace, Kan.
Perkins Windmill & Axe Co, a corpor.