Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1889-10-09
SUPREME c0URT-sAcRAMENTo CAL
ENDAR.

Monday, November Ii, 1889.
Court meets in bank at 10 AM.
Motions.
Examination of class of applicants for adnis.
sion to practice.
Is, 473- Fresno National Bank vs. Superior
Court.
Tuesday, November IL, 1889.
20,e06-Ex parte Miller on habeaS corpus
lS,07S-Duff VS.. Duff.
j., 469-knock, adm, VS.. Bunnell
l2.S90-Bewick ct al. VS.. Muir ct al.
124Sl-Bewiek ct al. VS.. Muir ct al.
12,S>2-Glide VS.. Dwyer ct al.
u 5l1-Eversden VS.. Mayhem.
"Wednesday, November Is, 1889.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
20,5e2-People VS.. Rogers.
20,5e6-People VS.. Beaver.
20,597-People vs. Kelley.
lS,416-Estate of billiard.
1S,S94-Cleghorn VS.. Zumwalt,
13,i94-Colusa County VS.. Hudson.
Is SoS-Coogan VS.. Hagein ct al
lS,4o9-Hewlitt VS.. Pitcher ct al.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
20 59s-People vs. Mineings.
2060l-People VS.. Wong All Hing.
lS,4l2-Frankel vs.. Diedesheimer ct al.
u 996-Callahan VS.. Warder.
1S,214-Fox ct al. vs. Stockton Combined Har-
yester and Agricultural Works.
1S,335-Clark VS.. Brown ct al.
l3,465-MeLean ct al VS.. Grow, adm, etc.
1883 Alexander VS.. Jackson ct al.
Thursday, November II, 1889.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
13,34S-Perkins ct al. VS.. onyet, exec, etc.
12,S93-Tremain VS.. Barney ct al
l3,412-Murdock, admx., VS.. Clarke ct al.
13,is2-Cady, assignee, etc., VS.. Leonard Sr.
1S,24S-Martin, assignee, VS.. Porter.
13,291-Wilcher VS. Conklin ct al.
13 35S-Van Bibber VS.. Hilton.
12,S59-Churchill ct al. VS.. Lauer ct al
DEPARTMENT TWO
l2,406-Anderson vs. Cal. Steam Nav Co.
12,94-Carle ct al. VS. &c Lock ct al.
1S,lS5-Wilhoit ct al. VS.. Tubbs
IS 23i-Catts VS.. Simpson ct al.
13 235-Riley VS.. Simpson ct al.
1S,Tl-McMullin VS.. Leitch ct al
- 365-Farnum ct al. VS.. Phenix ms. Co.
13,Seo-Emerson, admx., VS.. Whitaker ct al.
Friday, November Is, 1889.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
13,l67-Graham VS.. Larimer.
l3,26l-Higgins VS.. Ragsdale.
l3,2si-kitts VS.. Austin.
1850 ukeforth VS.. Lord
ID S93-ln re Bowman, an insolvent
13,435-De Noon VS.. Morrison ct al.
13.4iS-Downing vs. lie Du ct al.
lS,462-Jue Fook Sam ct al VS.. Lord.
DEPARTMENT TWO
iS,26o-Beemer, assignee, VS.. Freeman.
13,3l3-Stephens VS.. Soule ct al.
IL Sl4-Fiske ct al. vs. Soule.
1S,S4-Vaca Valley and Clear Lake r. R. VS..
Mansfield ct al
13,479-Washington vs. Black.
13,439-kneebone VS.. Kneebone.
13,011-Wise ct al. VS.. Wi liams ct al.
lS,k6-Stanton VS.. French.
Monday, November Is, 1889.
DEPARTMENT ONE
1S,19O-Fulweiler vs. Hogs Back Con. Mining
Co.
13,3S9-Southern Pacific Co. VS.. Burr.
13,3t0-Southern Pacific Co. VS. Meyer
l3,3iI-lngram, assignee, VS.. Smith ct al
13,319-Lind ct al VS.. Gloss.
l3,395-Congrave ct al. VS.. Southern Pacific Co.
l3,o3l-Carter ct al. VS.. Green Mountain G. II.
Co. ct al.
l3,lS9-McLear VS.. Hapgood ct al.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
13.S06-McGrew VS.. Davis.
13,262-Burgess VS.. Fairbanks ct al.
13,067-Eaton VS. Richerl.
19,2l9-Jones VS.. Duchow.
13,43i-Carter VS.. McQuade. Sheriff, etc.
J3.46S-Csrter ct al VS.. Bacgalupi.
l8,493-Weidekind VS.. Tuolumne CountyWater
13,3O2-McGrath vs. Wallace.
Tuesday, November 10, 1889.
DEPARTMENT ONE
l3,192-Bulwer Con. Mining Co. VS.. Standard
Con. Mining Co.
1S,450-Bulwer Con. Mining Co. VS.. Standard
13.451-Bulwer Con. Mining Co. VS.. Standard
Con. Mining Co.
12,147-Hibbard VS. Howell
1S,l72-Eby VS.. Board of School Trustees, etc.
Is, 2S4-Knott VS.. Peden.
l3,4l9-People VS.. Brady.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
13, 329-Bates VS.. Gerber ct al.
13,3Sl-Estate of Stevens
13,4O2-McGuire vs. Drew ct al.
l3,4O3-Towle ct al. VS.. Clunie ct al
l3,449-Mechanics Building and Loan Associ-
alton VS.. King ct al
13,4S0-Fariell VS.. Board of Trustees of the
City of Sacramento