Bridgeton pioneer., 1889-01-17
NO. 2I30
sion by the plaintiffs. The sase will De
continued this afternoon.
MONDAY AFTERNOON.

SION Oy lne plaintiffs. The case will bs
continued this afternoon.
MONDAY AFTERNOON.
In the case Of Walter Hav, who was
not liberated last week after The i1rv
rendered verdict Of not guilty.. on
the charge of grand larceny. tne Court
ordered the Clerk TO draw al order TO
authorize the Sheriff 70 hola Walter
Hay and George Brady 0 appear be-
fore the next grand jury, 70 answer 70
the charge of conspiracy TO b1rslarize.
The case OF Herman V. Walsa vent
over until next term, by direction OF
the Court.
The case of Robbins brothers acair,st
Foulk d Turner, was continued. with
DIR. Teller, of this city, or the stand
in behalf OF the defence. Tne doctor
thought the horse was suffering from
a severe cold, and for s. had ruaran-
teed to cure the trouble. bue it was
refused. On Monday last. he exam
med the horse and again today. and
found the animal in fair condition.
1t was greatly improved from what it
was when he first saw it. He thought
at present the animal was valued at
about $sU Mr.. VanSyckel rook the
witness, and his cross examination
was very severe, and the witness con-
tradicted himself somewhat.
Fred Conner. the blacksmith. had
seen the horse and thought the animal
was worth about SIS or $50. Since
Robbins owned him, be had sllod him.
at present he thought the animal was
in pretty good condition. Ee had
heard DR.. Teller say the aorse was
suffering from q severe colo
DR.. VIM. Z. Cooper. ttaa Salem Vet.
Urinary Surgeon, stated that he lad
had seven years experience. He
owned the horse last Fail and decided
that he was suffering iron nasal
catarrh. He advised at that time for
the Robbins TO take the horse back 10
those of whom they had purchased it.
Mr.. Cooper was OF the opinion that the
horse could have been easily cured.
He was of the opinion that the animal
would bring about $75 under tbs ham
mer.
Mr. NanSyckel was very searching
IN his cross-examina.ion. The witness
Testimony was very much IN variance
with the other surgeons. Ia answer
to MIR. VanSyckelsquestion the doctor
said he would cure the animal for $25
or would be willing TO pay 1926 for the
animal.
| Lewis H. Fox knew the hofse very
we'll and considered the animal q pretty
good one. He thought the price was
fair one. He saw the horse last Mon
day and considered him greatly i'm
proved; about S75 or $50 was e fair
value for the animal at present. He
had seen the horse many times on the
street since the sale.
j. Frank Daley followed Mr.. Fox as
witness. He had seen The horse,
and from general appearances eonsid-
cred him worth anywhere from f76 10
800.
DR.. Cole, OF Millville, examined the
horse three times within q shor. time
He considered the case was q durable
one, and placed the same value on
the horse as had Mr.. DALEY, In his
cross examination, Mr.. VanSyokel
tried hard to find out just the profes-
sional meaning for slight eold,' and
created some merriment by his pointed
question.
Here the defense rested. and Percy
Robbins was called to rebut some OF
the evidence OF the defense. Guvon
Robbins was also called to rebus.
Both Mr.. Logue and Mr.. VanSvckel
made elaborate arguments
The Court stated that the decision
OF the lower Court was reversed, and
$25 allowed the plaintiffs, the Court
stating that it was the evidence OF
Surgeon Cooper that it would take
that sum to cure the animal. The
court then adjourned Tor the term.