Abilene weekly reflector. [volume] (Abilene, Kan.) 1888-1935, 1889-02-28
JUSTICES BAR.
Full Proceedings of the District Court
"A Large Amount of Civil Business
Transacted.

cost of plaintiff.
Kirby VS.. Kindness: Leave given tC
file amended pleadings.
Malott Il Co. VS.. j. F. Baxter: Leave
given to file pleadings.
ThOs. Kirby VS.. NJ. D. Herington &
Co: Leave given to file pleading.
L. 3. West VS.. Mccormack ct al
Leave given to file answers.
Westerly Savings Bank VS.. r. n
Curtis: r. d. German given leave to
answer.
A. n. Clapp was given permission to
file answer to cross petition of VIM.
Timm.
w. S. Hunsecker VS.. E. Slneve: B.
G. CranstOn appointed guardian and
given one week to answer.
Travellers ms. Co. VS.. Dewar & Co:
Leave given to file amended answers.
Nyer VS.. Mccoy ct al: Dismissed at
cost of plaintiff.
Middleton VS.. NJ. E. church of Wood
bine: Dismissed at cost of plaintiff.
IL. G. Wing VS.. J. j. Miller ct al:
Mandate ordered spread on record and
Judgment given.
State VS.. Jesse Miles: County attor-
ney entered nolLe prOSeqai and case
dismissed.
State VS.. Otis Downs: Same.
State VS.. Daniel Thompson, real
name Daniel Gordon: Prisoner ar
raigned and pleaded guilty. This was
for boOtlegging, Gordon having been
arrested early last fall.
State VS.. Richard Yeomans: De-
PENDANT arraigned and pleaded guilty
to first count. nOlle pros. on second.
State VS.. Mary Dyer: Arraigned,
pleaded not guilty.
Geo. StOneking waived arrangement,
pleaded not guilty.
b. G. CranstOn appointed to defend
Mary Stoneking.
First Natl bank VS. f II Boardman
and G w C ROhrer: Judgment for
plaintiff of 81, 7S7. go and costs with II
per cent. interest.
Kirkendall, Jones & Co and Rufus
Feeney: Dismissed at cost of plaintiff.
Chas p Kellogg VS. Berry Brothers
Mercantile Co: Judgment as per jour
nal entry.
Rosenheim, Lewis & Co VS. John and
Lucy Como: Judgment for plaintiff
by default, S3l569, Int at per cent.
w E Schmertz VS. Berry Bros Mer-
camille Co: Judgment for plaintiff by
default 81, 1854 with Int at 10 per
cent. from date.
VIM Harrison VS. Berry Bros Mer.
camille Co: Judgment by default of
81 ,019.60 and II per cent and costs.
Chaplin & Chesebro VS. Osborn ct al:
by default against Osborne
and Osborne and NJ D Herington for
So $50 and II per cent interest, decree
of foreclosure and order of sale.
I B Sweet VS. Henry Lifts, Adm, ct
al: Judgment by default for 1862 40,
II per cent, foreclosure and order of
sale.
David Matteson vs. VIM Foy and
Berry Bros Mercantile Co: Judgment
for plaintiff by default of S519.6O
against Berry Bros M'tile Co and case
continued as to VIM Foy, for services.
Fred Stammer VS. B J S Friedman:
Judgment for plaintiff by default for
S119.75 and costs, Int II per cent, this
Judgment to be first lien upon the
premises.
Motion to set aside service in the
case of Lydia A Amick VS. j ] Miller
was sustained and case continued.
Lebold, FiSher& Co VS. o Ball & Son:
Judgment by default STS5.00.
w II Owen VS. q E Shaeffer ct al:
Judgment for plaintiff S32S.25 and
costs.
Asa W Kenny VS. w A Cormack ct
ii: Judgment for plaintiff 81, 0SS and
,osts, first lien upon premises.
L B West VS. John Mccormack: |
Judgment for plaintiff at 1898 and
,oStS and continued as to Goodwin and |
Bishop.
Kansas Loan & Trust Co VS. Henry |
2ees ct al: The Chicago Lumber Co |
vas allowed to file petitions.
S Bennett VS. Maggie F D Crawford |
It al: Judgment for plaintiff by de-
ault for S419.2S and costs, decree of
foreclosure.
Durham, Hanna, Munger & Co VS.
G Russell: Judgment by default
1862.
Geo d Bennett VS. Geo w Hall:
Judgment for plaintiff S29S.10.
l. w Seavy VS. Jesse Williams: Judg-
neDt against Williams for S474.S3, case
ontinued as to Robert Chaplin.
R H Kane VS. Paul and Ann Carroll:
Judgment for plaintiff $685. and cost.
Theodore Crosby VS. F W Potter:
Judgment for plaintiff $685. and cost
nd first lien on property.
l. A Jadderberg VS. A j Loyback:
Judgment for plaintiff 1924, Sc and first
len on premises.
Nave & McCord Mercantile Co VS. E
Y Billy: Judgment for plaintiff S300.79
nd costs,
r L Mcdonald vs. E W Billy: Judg-
lent for plaintiff $316.10 and costs.
Hiland Southworth VS. z A York:
Judgment for plaintiff against all de-
endants except Isaac Eyre for SIS and
osts.
o Bonner VS. Berry Bros Mercantile |
20: Judgment for plaintiff sl14O and
osts and judgment made to include J |
Berry.
Nave s. McCord VS. c E Vance and C
Vance: Judgment against G S Vance
371.S0; case dismissed as to C I'll
lance.
Ridenour Baker & Co VS. Berry Bros
fercantile Co: Judgment for plaintiff
1606.47.
FRIDAYS SESSION.
Travellers Ins Co VS. G. W Carpenter
t al: Judgment for plaintiff fer $3.50
nd costs, II per cent from date with
ecree of foreclosure.
Lebold, Fisher s. Co VS. G G Bessey
t al; Judgment for $416O.
Abilene Natl bank VS. same: Judg-
neut for S212S and costa