The intelligencer. [volume] (Lexington, Mo.) 1887-1891, 1889-03-30
IEv"Ek;lI LIST.
CIRCUIT COURT DOCKET.
April Term, 1880.
IsT DAY, APRIL lsr. 1889

lST DAY, hPRlL ISL, IocJ
/. John +. Bascom assignee. VS.. W. Il. Jack
2. James c McGrcw vs Mo. Pac. Isy. Co.
damages; continued at plaintiffs costs
8. Mo. Pac. nv. Co, vs.. Ii. =. Francisco.
TO assess damages,
4. state use Bascom, assignee. VS.. 10. W
Bowman ct al; on bond.
s.. James + Mari. application for license to
practice law.
6. State use VIM. L. Catron VS.. 10. W Bow
man ct al, on bond; death OF defendant sug-
gested.
I. Conrad Swisler VS.. w. Is. storts CT al, from
Saline county mistrial.
s. Hattie Is WIlmOtt at al, VS.. Mo. Pac. lty.
Co., appellant; appeal.
o. Robt {. Greer VS.. George Youngs; on Judg-
10. Ben Elliott, admir-, vs.. Ann NJ Keith,
lnterpleadrr Of Geo. &. Keith; reversed and re-
manded,
pellant; appeal.
IL. Alfred Carr supt. &c, vs. Richard Bret
Is. Henry Wright, appellant, VI. Marti" Coi-
line; appeal.
30 DAY, APRIL 81, 1889.
IA. W. J. Whitening vs.. J. A. Fulkerson,
const, appellants appeal.
Is. Maria Reed VS.. Mo. PaC. Hy. CO.. appel
liant; appeal.
is, John Lubrecht. appellant. VS.. Dorothea
| GelZer, executrix; appeal from probate court
peal.
| rtNcfbtu uhu i'LiauuSu'
1917. Ben. Elliott. admir- VS.. Keith; attach
ISL Ben Elliott, admir-. VS.. Keith. appeal;
attachment.
4rn DAY. APRIL i'm, 1899.
10. G. q. jenkins VS.. ID. G BLggarly ct al.
20. J. II. Moreland, VS. william wessr e, al.
sjectment, taken under advisement.
q hartman u Bro vs. David Rekop, guar
p il Smith ct al, VS.. M. Pac. Ry. 90.
mandamus; motion for new trial.
%. Minnie l.. Jarvis vs.. John IL. Jarvis,
| divorce; default and continued.
"a. q A Sturge5, adm r. VS.. VIM Il Jack
son, replevIn; answer and reply hled
~5TuDAY, APRIL 9TH, 1889
%. Maria Brown !s. William Brown, di-
yorce; proof published and continued.
26. Lizzie S. Manscll Va. Chas. IL. Mansell,
divorce; default and continued.
q. Selma Kalsan va. Peter Kalsan, divorce
default and continued.
% Thomas II. Caslcel Va. Hugh 7. stultz
30. Thoma- ii Casleel vs.. Hugh 4. StulIz.
replevin; answer filed.
80. Joseph IL. Neal vs.. John w. Lewis ct al
vendors lien.
9Th DAY. APRIL 9TH. 1889
} 81. Valentine B!atz VS.. Max Baempf. ac.
count; ans Yer filed.
81. Core Bros. CONS. o Vi. leo Il. GOOu-
win ct al: 2 notes.
SO. Lizzie Scott 1T nj. VS.. Anna al. Gwinn ct
3 nj, partition and dover; continued Tor report
"a. JEFF. Bedford ct III. vs. James DalDy ST.
and Jr., irjunct'on; answer fled AID leave Il
l plead to answer
80 James Darby, ST., VS.. Thos ID. Sanders
= manages.
36. Scott Jones Hat Co., vs.. Thomas A
! Groves; attachment.
: 81. Scott Jones Hat Co., vs. Geo. Il Goou
win; attachment.
. 7Tu DAY, ArRIL STU, 1889.
q IS. Homer Rawlin vs. Frank ThorntOn; note
80. Newark Machine Co Va. Greer Il Mock
. 40 Newark Machine Co. vs.. Greer Dug
o lass; not.
4 a. Joseph A. Whitsett ". Robt. Martin c
Il Joseph A. whrtsett vs.. Joseph M. Martin
n d. Joseph A. wnltsett vs.. Joseph NJ. Marti
o "A John e. Cobb. assignee, vs.. VIM Kin;n
elOe; note.
SRI DAY, APRIL 9TH, 1889.
45 f. G. lie, vs. J and j. A. Prather; nott
Is As, Lafayette County Bank VS.. w. B Malt
IF A.. John G.. Longdon vs.. W. H.. Hickman
!. is. Henry Miles vs.. Benz. F.. Feagans, mott
10 40. j. Maloney VS.. Miller and Saylor; dar
SO. Robt. Lee Smith VS.. Mary Ann Withe
ct al; to correct deed.
81. james II. Ish VS.. Mary Hanley ct nj ;pa
le titiOn.
!Tn DAY. APRIL 10TH 1885.
J. 81. Kate Washington VS.. james Washington
al divorce; alias writ.
81 Joseph s. Johnson ct al VS.. VIM. Shore
IN al; partition. ,
So. Inter State II. 7. Ry. Co. vs. DC Wei
u erman ct n to assess damages.
n. So. Inter State Il. L. Ry. Co. VS.. M. L. Ma
nard & Co.. ct al; to assess damages.
H. 81. John f. Bascom assignee oil ii. u. Tree
a IS. r.. W. Broughton assignee Of VIM.
Terrell; assignment.