New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1889-03-01

=. S1Sas - sa71snG3 What MI. Buckle's
ff5snds SS5dss 8 tkss be inplored Mr.. Walter TO
eaay his land went On his knees to him. was
ths sxpreniou heard used Nor was Ma. Buckle
aJoue in his opposition. At least one outsider,
q usa af sosne eminence, heard what sas coming
ana vainly tiled TO stop IT,
Thers were two things which predisposed Eng
In people to believe theso letters genuine The
Aiss was tie authority Of the great journal IN
wA3sh they appeared. The kecond was Mr.
PsxaeIfs refusal to bring action Why he refused
r hing action, himself knowing the letters to
- Soeeerios, has never been entirely explained
nistRst Of London jury was not enough 1
axked yuxtsrday ono who ought TO know. He
answered: Because we had no evidence to
prove them foreeries" But neither is that quite
susBcdsnt There will be actions enough now.
Tfe theory that actions are barred by the statute
creating tho Commission Is not thought seund by
the best hwyers Az The Times itself Offers no
rsparstion and makes no proposal TO relieve Mr..
Psrneu from the costs imposed on him by an
abandoned libel neither ne nor his associates will
ssxxple TO seek full legal redress.
Ous word about Mr.. LAboucherc's intervention.
Mhether any legal inquiry into his proceedings
wfll follow ID doubtful: whether his action was
In scy respect beneficial TO the cause he wished
70 hslp IA more doubtful still 1t is thought TINT
Pieott would not have absconded but for the
confession he made to Mr.. LAbouchcee II Is cer-
tain tbat Sir Charles Russell fully expected to
extsact confession from Pigott In open court.
ana he fully believed that PEott would appear
q Tuesday. Whoever else is content with his
Hisht. Sir Charles is not; nor Is George Lewis
10 WHOM. Jointly with this great advocate. be-
1oam the credit Of this great triumph The sur
rseu6ng eenins which Sir Charles Russell showed
A.. A. ~Svs< ~ "A In
snly ,hy the SURPRISING genius Of Dir. Lewis in
Hsysring n out Of court.
Every effort win now be made to connect the
Geveuumsus with The Tines az jointly respon-
no fee the letters Sir William Harcourts
hoieeafsas speech at Derby last night shows Whist
tne - snd his friends win take. The Attorney
zoGsa1 II meanhes Of the Government, though
- q, - Cabinek HI. was, on this theory the
nsaism q intercourse between the Ministry ana
1hs T1mSs he advised his colleagues to create
H Cunninion: be pledged his professional re-
pate ~ the genuinencs Of the letters; MP. Snih
bvowed Aimself Mr.. Walters friend. and admitted
( n Hnxifsment that he LA consulted Mr. Walter
S a tie subieet; the Irish police were put ss ths
& Ievies a The Tines The Cr,wn Solicitor acted
i foe tbam ID IislnA the sssses psecnhoSes OF me
! Hpss4 C1ses wsre ransacksd Sof audience; Ihe
35neuc .ena rs Goyssnmsn& sosethef were parties
- ~ ssuplrssy 70 prevent Home Rule oy Dc
& <66Sy1ne M HsrnelL All this sad mneh moro v
8a&aNnA ~ xeiuiseees VIII hsve to meet these
B = 9 ~ sseAs cf them: In tbs House Of cOm-
51ld(3 Nks& q ma oufsids Of the House 8 Vita
8tI6 1ka noss y3olknt Home Ruis orsAns
4 r. n 10 ~ their heads IN the intoxicssion
&4f \ 13ha6 hcse advsrnty III; they bear
Walter the foreess - 1he
4 &ansS As<e xss1Es .rhs TineS dsstzeysds
Ia r5sH