The Daily times. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1886-1889, 1889-01-18

said tickets were received and deposited
rs YOU allege. in the boxes furnished by
YOU OF your friends or partisans.
"Such reception of these tickets WINS
beyond the authorized power OF the
United States Commissioners Any
party in receiving such tickets was not
acting as a United States Commissioner
He was acting IN his Individual not his
official capacity Ills office cOuld give
no weight 20 the act.
" ! assert that even il such a reception
of tickets could bee legal under any cir
cumstances. vet 10 could only be- done
under full and fair notice 10 me. !
should have been entitled t0 be- present
OF TO be represented by some one who
would have protected my interest. / on
gave me no notice whatever
RESPONSIBILITY or THE CITY or RICH
MOND.
81 deny that the city of Richmond
should be held responsible for any act
alleged by you to have been done by
friends or pariisans of mine. FOR two
reasons First, because the alleged acts
were never committed. second, because
even if il were trgc that they were done
They were the acts of few persons, and
not the acts Of the city ia lbs corporate
capacity. nor were they the acts of the
mass of her citizens For the same rea-
sons / deny that the entire vote of the
city should be thrown ont and not count
ed in This contest
u assert, and shall prove that
THE coIoRED VOTERS THEMSELVES Dr.
LAYED THE VOTING,
by crowding upon each other, instead of
coming mp IN single file, and that they
were frequently called on by the Rcpub-
can supervisor at the Third Precinct,
jackson ward. 10 cease such disOrderly
conduct. and were told by him that they
themselves were delaying the voting /
also assert that you delayed the voting
at that precinct by attempting So erect "a
barrier az the polls, and did not desist
therelrom until ordered by the police Of
the city TO DO So
81 also assert and shall prove that this
same supervisor interiered with and de-
laved both the voters and the judges Of
az times too numerous 90 re
call; that he i'm one instance when a
voter named Scott offered his ballot, the
said supervisor undertook 20 find his
name on the registration book; that be
soon called out that no such name could
De found. ThereupOn Mr.. Edgar Allan
asked the said supervisor in what letter
he had looked. who replied in the letter
c. On receiving that astonishing am
swer, the said Mr. Allan denounced him
in strong terms and suggested 90 him 90
try the letter s. This was done and bis
name was found
In proof OF the utter worlhlessness Of
the
EX-PARrE ELECTION
carried ON by you after the polls were
closed ! call your attention 10 the fact
that on page l3 Of your notice you claim
that Carter Marshall stood all day IN
line. and after the poll al said precinct
was closed deposited q hsllOt for YOU in
one of your aforesaid private boxes
u assert and shall prove that said Mar
shall had been
DEAD FOR MONTHS
ut is unfair TO count living man for
you who did not yote, but il was impos-
sible 10 make "a dead man vote, even ia
the darkness OF night. when the dead are
alleged 10 leave their graves shall
prove that this was not the only dead
man whose ghost was required lO vote
for y0u that night Some even had the
bOldncss to venture ont during the day
II shall prove that yOu yourself have
been known 90 require cOl0red men Ia
your employment 90 vote when YOU
know that they were not qualified On
one occasion YOU were warned at the
polls that a hoy ia your employment was
under age and not entitled 10 vote but
you insisted on his voting. The ignorant
boy did SD, and afterward fled in fear OF
for crime
bogus TICKETS.
II assert and shall prove that so great
was your desire 10 be elected rs the Rep
-esentatiye TO the Filty-firsi Congress
rom the Third Congressional district OF
that YOU or your agent attempt
'd to secure Your election by means OF
,ogus tickets. You $40 feared that this F.
attempt, which needs not be character .
zed by any adjective, would be discoy- /
red if such bogus tickets were printed I
a Richmond that YOU, by means OF /
-FOUR agent, one Frank Murphy /
attempted to have the same /
printed in certain printing office in .
" Washington, d. c. Failing in that. YOU /
lad the same printed elsewhere and the /
anne were distributed and used by I'M /
voters The tickets YOU so .
lad printed were similar TO the regular (
Democratic ticket. except that they had /
our name inserted for Representative .
instead of mine You were willing thus /
lot only TO wrong me, but also sacrifice /
o your selfish ends the Presidential +
andidate"
SECOND ADDENpUM.
\ notice of the second addmdum TO .
lr Nise's answer was Yesterday served .
N Mr. Naddill The add,Hdum claims .
hat 81 votes which were cast 40 Bakers
recinct and Smither's precinct were
one Of them legally qualified voters at
he said precincts, and that their votes
hOuld be rejected
Yesterday morning Mr Wise and MI
am Prcskauer went up 90 the Hastings
.ourt TO serve this addendum on Nh
y addili When MI PrOskauer handed
he paper TO the Judge, Mr.. Waddill said.
My God, how long is this thing going to
Isl Mr. Proskauer replied Il am in
lmed il viii be kept up month"
Judge Waddill replied. II am tired of
lem already"
TnE ANSWER SERVED WEDNESDAY.
Mr.. Wise and Colonel Elicit both stat
20 ii TINES representative last night
at the answer was served on Mr Wad.
n Wednesday, rs stated in yesterdays
lper, and that our report in the matter
as, in every respect correct The sec
I'D add,adim 10 the answer was the
lly one filed yesterday. The other 0d- /
Hdam will come in due time
Try OUR PLANTATION CIGARS, only
per hundred, and cents apiece q
yeDs u Minor Drug Company.
SICK HEADACHE cured 10y using DR.. |
~. L d.