Waterbury evening Democrat., 1889-03-15
4 MAN IN THE. KITCHEN.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A BETTY"
 AND THE OTHER KIND.


 Can Sometimes Make Themselves Very
 J'SefuI-The Genuine "Betty.' However.
 |. n Regular Bull in a China Shop.
 Most women heartily despise a Betty" by which is usually meant a man who pohes his nose into the details of household affairs. dabbles in the work of the kitchen and irritates the house wife by assuming, regularly or occasion ally. functions which she deems exclu sive to herself The dislike of women for this kind of man is in the main well grounded, The average man is. unfor- tunately. unable to make himself useful in household work without making himself, also more or less nuisance 4 question of this kind has, however. many sides,
 THE WOMEN ARE RESPONSIBLE.
 The women who are most jealous of their prerosatives in the kitchen are not always possessed of the best capacity for maintaining them: and some of the most perfect housekeepers the writer has ever known, easy nistresses of the arts and systems that make up the various de partments of household management and industy, have been most indulgent and apprcciative of the efforts of hus- band son or brother to help about the house. even encouraging original expert mcnt along the lines which have brought into being the scornful epithet above quoted.
 In their households the men were never spitefully ordered to Let things alonc." told 10 keep out of my way" or requested to mind their own busi- nes.s." because, in the first place. the housewife respected herself too much to use such expressions or their equivalents. and because. in the second place. the men had acquired such familiarity with the ins and outs of tho kitchen that they were not likely to hinder rather than help when they had occasion to turn their hand to this, that or the other mat ter of houscwork. This touches the secret of the whole matter, and a little thinking along this line will suggest a query whether women are not, generally speaking, to blame for the fact that the average man is nuisance in the kitchen.
 A mother carefully taught her sons many details of work usually considered the sole province of girls and concerning which boys generally grow up. in utter ignorance. They washed and wiped dishes, learned to prepare plain meals, had practice in sweeping and dusting and putting to rights. and were taught to patch and darn neatly and to sew on buttons. Some of them learned some thing of the higher branches" When they went out into the world they had frequent occasion to bless the mother for these useful accomplishments: and when they became heads of households, they had an intelligent practical knowl- edge of the details of the work of which make the burden easy in many ways where another man would have made it heavier.
 THE REALLY GOOD HUSBAND.
 No man worthy of the name permits his wife or any woman in his house to perform the heavy drudgery of carrying coal and wood, caring for furnaces and stoves. moving stoves or heavy furni- ture, beating carpets, and so or. But this need net be the limit of a mans use fulness about the house. There is no reasonable reason why man should not be able to broil steak, boil or bake po- tatoes. cook an egg, make coffee or tea and prepare other articles of food should an emergency arise to make it desirable (and such emergencies do often arise), and do it too without turning the kitchen and dining room topsy turvy in the operation. Some men can and do accomplish such work. and even make biscuits. griddle cakes and the like
 A woman whose husband Is in the habit of taking hold" when needed in housework has been heard to say that she would rather have him to depend on in case of indisposition or other c,ner gcncy than any girl that could be hired. He does not interfere when there is no cause for it. but he saves labor for his wife and expense for himself, and he Is not at all ashamed of doing it nor afraid to undertake it. No man need be: rather any man should be ashamed of unwillinsness and should regret in- ability to perform any ordinary house hold task on occasion.
 Some men have or profess horror of all housework. It is often grounded in laziness. They will go to great expense and trouble rather than turn their hands to anything in the house. even to making fire. The "Bettys" do not come from that class. Neither are they recruited from the husbands of common sense, tact and judgment, who know "how to do thinks" and know when to do them and when to refrain. The genuine Betty" is a genuine meddler. whose zeal is without knowledge. whose help fulness is without discretion. and whose officiousness and conceit neutralize what might be useful in his make mp. Wom- ankind is excusab!e for detesting him. Let her. however, accept these lines as a plea for withholding the opprobrious title from men who do not deserve it, and for an honest recognition of the right usefulness of a properly taught and sensible man about the house, and even in the kitchen.-One of the "Aien Folks in Good Housekeeping.