San Antonio daily light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1886-1907, 1889-11-29
FoRTY-FIFTH DISTRICT.
Setting of Non-Jury Cases.

Setting OF NOn-Jury Eases
MONDAY, DECEMBER 2, 1889.
RPTabor ct al, VS. George Mudd
D& A Oppenheimer vs. X b Nc
Rea ct al.
RFPipes VS. G H & S A R'y Co.
Is Morris Landa VS. Issy Landa. =.
IA Fannie ID Porter vs. ] w Harwell
Is Pat Rowan VS. s A & A p R'y Co
II A IT Hensley Il Sons vs. 2 I
Shields.
10 w J b Richards vs. & q N R'y
Co.
81 James Bailey vs Robert Martin
% A T Hensley & Sons VS. A
Schryver.
% s Strauss & Co vs. Paul Marks.
26 Robert H Hunstock VS. lone Pal.
mer.
So Andreas and Jacob Bendele We
Medina County.
SO Adams & Wickes VS. B. Thomas.
81 John Twohig VS. George White.
65 r Il Beauregard VS. G H & s A
R'y Co.
6S Louis Bergstrom vs. Jose Cassiano,
collector.
70 Robt s Davis VS. Ferdinand Nigg-
Ii, ct al.
so J r Mason VS. George Paschal.
So Charlotte f Jones vs Mary A Nav
erIck, ct al.
SO + Crider, surv. ETC., vs A AL
lensworth.
"a G King ct al VS. J w Harris ct al.
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8.
95 Harry Benjamin & Bro VS. San An
tonic Street Railway company.
9S G Epson, executor, VS. estate of
George w Paschal, deceased.
102 San Antonio National Bank VS. P
II Henderson, ct al
los Franklin Byerly ct al VS. Joseph
r Harris ct al.
107 H d Kampmann VS. Allensworth
& Son.
liz Thomas Devices vs. Missouri Pa
cific Railway company ct al.
1875 w r Story VS. Issy Landa ct al.
127 w G. Stillson VS. J Stevens.
l2S A G Paris ct al vs M Strive ct al.
$50 Boyd, White & Co vs. Elmira II
Reed ct al.
13l F M Mullen VS. Missouri Pacific
Railway company.
1873 G B Boero VS. ] p Nelson.
1876 City of San Antonio VS. M & M
Building and Loan association.
139 CO Mcclure vs. City of San An
tonic.
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 4.
140 James B Mann VS. J G Vogt.
142 Augusta De Were VS. Chas De
Were.
46 Dan and Nat Lewis VS. I.& G N
1877 Alamo Ice and Brewing Co VS. A
Belknap.
14S II James VS. H Presnall ct al
l49 w III Irwin VS. j d Smith
Isl John Zig VS. City of San Antonio.
l52 Michael VeltOn VS. City of San
Antonio.
153 State Of Texas VS. w H Simms ct
al.
154 Peter Lennartz VS. l. C McCulloch.
l56 ] H A Meyer VS. L Orynski.
l5S Johanna Roth VS. Carl Roth.
l59 Eliza and J w Kinney VS. Edwin
Polk.
164 John r Cottingham VS. NJ F Sew
ard ct al.
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 5.
III q A and Frances E Horle VS. L
Esner.
l72 Ascension CRUZ y Robles ct al VS.
Ia G n R'y Co.
l75 Lewyn & Martin VS. Carl Won
Studnitz.
l76 Lewyn & Martin VS. G. Roos.
179 Geo d Barnard & Go VS. Oscar
BergstrOm.
ISL Leila Sturdevant VS. Eugene K
Sturdevant.
1872 H Gembler VS. M CassiIlas.
1873 Bexar Building and Loan Asso-
citation vs. s d Heady ct al.
1856 G o Mcclure VS. l & q n R'y Co.
1877 E Runyan VS. J G Burnett.
100 Adam Rahm, Jr, VS. Oscar Berg
strom, Admr.
191 Mary n Schwalby vs. DIS Stanley.
1872 Matilda Hoffman, VS. John Hoff.
mann.
1913 Gilroy & Brown VS. & G N R'y
Co.
1876 Oscar G Guessaz vs. Bridget E
Guessaz.
1876 Elmendorf & Co vs. Mary Mathison
AdmX.
1877 Geo Dullnig VS. Southern Pacific
R'y Co.
1913 A A Ellison VS. Mo Pacific R'y Co.
1919 II Greenwall & Sons VS. Earnest
Rische.
FRIDAY, DECEMBER 6.
200 d G Ogden vs w III Stout ct al.
202 Wild vs. NJ Strive.
203 Mary S Cobble VS. Peter Cobble.
2O4 l. j Further VS. Amalie Anderson
ct al.
205 + Whitecotton VS. & G. n R,v