Arizona weekly journal-miner., 1889-06-19
DISTRICT COURT.
Jvdgc James h. Wright, Psesid.ns.
 WEpNHsDAY. June 12

wollenburg. Action on prommissov note; judgment sgxinss defendant | who were sureties.
 | Melville Herman Va. Birchett q Chi son. Judgment for plaintiff in th sum of $l6,72l.o5.
 | Cases of Kendall vs. J. E. Bovers. ;. Oougherty vs c. c. Bean ct al ;anta Barbara National Rank "a. 0. ' Rogers ct al, Reese ct al. vs. Prescott , [ trizohs Central Railroad Company 1 were ordered to be placed on calendar
 Humphreys vs. wm. Garland, place. on calendar, leave to answer during th term, and continued.
 Reese vs. Wm. R. Rhodes. Motto, for costs sustained, and bond fixed ., $l0O.
 Hart X Brsndenstein vs. l.. E. Hofi mann, placed on calendar and iudg ment for $7Ss0S.
 Houck & Dieter vs. Jas. Manning Action on prommissory note. Ths following jurors were empanneled te try the case: orick Jackson, J. c Boblett, J. Oneill, W. Williams, J. M More, J. Dauphin. E. St. Clair, K. Nc. Nary, F. w. Williams, c. Quinn, c. K. Bracken, G. Ridenour. Case submitted, and verdict for defendant. Reese vs. Rhodes. Bond for costs demanded and fixed at $lO0. Trial set for ' go P. m.
 Hart X Brandenstein vs. l.. F.. Hoff. man. Judgement for $7SS.OS.
 Hardwickvs A. & P. K. R, Co. Dis missed by plaintiff. Salxman vs Hull ct al, two cases consolidated by consent. Dismissed ss to defendant. Continued until morn ing.
 Case of Territory vs. Ed. Keyes; juryentered and rendered verdict: "W~, the jury m the above entitled cause find the defendant guilty of voluntary man. slaughter, and recommend him to the mercy of the court"
 THURSDAY, June l3. The case of Salzmsn vs. Hull was resumed this morning. Jury charged and retired.
 FRIDAY, June IA. Territory vs. Lark Pierce. Grand jury having ignored the bill. defendant was discharged. He had been arrested with Reyes, as accessory to murder.
 Reese vs. Rhodes. Case occupied the attention of the court yesterday and tn morning. It is claimed that the plaintiff became indebted to tho de- fendant $4 ,450 for certain real estate in this county, for which he delivered . paper intended to be . mortgage. The plaintiff paid several sums of money. leaving . balance due of $2,S9S.63, which he offered to the defendant, who now claims the land and premises ab- solutely The indebtedness is claimed to be wholly disproportionats to the value of the land and premises. The plaintiff asks thst the deed be declared A mortgage, the defendant to account for payments made to him by plaintiff; {; that he be allowed to redeem the said mortgage upon paying the amount due.
 SATURDAY, June l5.
 Lowenthal q Meyers vs Calden Hen- mig ct al. On motion of Attorney Van Horne. action was dismissed @ to 0. Hennig. He asked that the minutes of June 12 be corrected 10 show that the dismi. sal of this cause As against De fendants Rabbit and Donahue be final and full, but as against Tuning bs without prejudice, except as to the mortgage security on property in dis pute, wh oh is fully released to said defendants. So ordered
 Santa Barbara County Bank vs. c. F. Rogers ct al. Herndon < Hawkins entered as counsel for defendant, and 30 days allowed to file answer.
 Dougherty vs. Bean < Bean, contin- ued.
 Vending vs. Furbish, passed.
 Bank of Albuquerque vs. W. G. Stewart ct al. Defendant announced the case as closed, and asked leave to amend answer. Motion granted.
 MONDAY, June I7.
 At the evening session, Saturday last, the case of 0. E. Alvord vs Lydia A. Alvord, an action for divorce was heard and submitted.i
 This morning, Arizona Lumber Go. vs P. w. Perry was continued by con- sent.
 Salxman vs Hull. Motion for new trial denied, and defendant excepted. Kendall vs J. E. Bonestell. Judg. ment for plaintiff by default.
 History Company vs c. w. Dough- erty. Motion for payment on plead ings withdrawn. Argued and submit ted.
 The petit jury were informed by the court that their labors were now con. cluded. and thanking them for their attention to the duties devolving upon them, were discharged for the term.
 TUESDAY, June IS. At the session of court last evening, the case of the Valley Bank against Van Name was tried and judgment rendered for plaintiff in tho sum of $lsS.l0, which includes principal, in- terest and attorney's fees.
 Territory vs Persons, Ac. Judg. ment by consent of Arizona Central Railway O., for $2, ,567 .S5 and costs.
 Bank of California vs F. c. Towns- end. Dismissed by plaintiff.
 L. B. St. James VI B. Coxe, placed on calendar.
 Alvord vs Alvord. Judgment for divorce, e per decree.
 Houck | Deeter vs J. Manning.