Barton County democrat. [volume] (Great Bend, Kan.) 1885-1915, 1889-11-21
DISTRICT COURT PROCEEDINGS.
Disposal Of and Action Taken in Cases up
to Wednesday, November Goth.

to Wednesday, November Goth.
| Diffenbacher vs. Dunaway, Hulm,
and Bailey-jury returned verdict TO
plaintiff in sum of S1,173.72.
Stapleton & Blinn VS. Orr ct al-jury
judgment for pltff, 81 1868.
Prick & Co. VS. Corey & Nairn-firs
case plJff to have possession of proper
ty, and costs; second case dismissed
with prejudice.
Winklemeyer Brewing Co. vs. Bayel
ct ux, ct al-jury trial, judgment
against Johan B. and J. v. b. fol
$4,000, judgment against r. B. fol
81 $4,000
Zutavern & Hiss VS. Bayer ct al
judgment for $337.5O.
| James VS. ReintZ--jury, judgment fol
$4,000.
| Phelps 8iglow Wind Mill Co. rs
johnson and wife-jury disagreed and
discharged.
Garverick VS. Pratt-jury gave yer.
dict for defendant.
Winkelmire Brewing Co. VS. Wolfe
and wife-jury, judgment for pltff fol
1914 20.
Phelps Biglow ". NJ. Co. VS. Will
Jams ct al-judgment for pltff, by con-
sent, 1925.
Diffenbacher VS. Bishop-jury, judg-
ment for pltff, S292.7O:
Mantle Savings Bank VS. Geo. Brewer
ct al-judgment for So, 621.O0.
Same VS. Lucinda ACKNOWLEDGMENT
for So, 2s6.OO.
Hoadley VS. Chas. and Mary c. Wor-
man-judgment against Chas. w. for
So $50; continued as to Mary c. w.
Mcbride VS. Moss-motion by deft for
new trial Overruled.
Thompson VS. Penna-former judg-
ment set aside and case dismissed.
Bank of Ellinwood VS. Hotchkiss and
motion for new trial over
ruled.
Bender VS. Cue ct al-pltf got judg-
ment for $4,000.
First Natl Bank VS. Holmes-judg-
ment for pltff, ssO.85; stay of ex. 80
days.
Poland VS. Pertz ct al-judgment for
Frick & Co. 1916 and LIST lien; judg-
ment for pltff for S737.60 and I'd lien;
judgment for Frick s. Co. Sl75.S5 and
Sd lien.
Harpham VS. Woodbnrn ct al-judg-
ment for pltff, $s61.51.
Lewis VS. Pertz ct al-pltf gets judg
ment, 1854 3S.
Bender VS. COfer ct al--same. 1921. S8.
Lewis VS. Chapman-same, s397.36.
Stems VS. r. F. Cummins-same,
$157.3O.
Diffenbacher & Banta VS. Merhoff,
same, s212.35.
Funk & Co VS. Hanslich--same, $3.50.
Same VS. Knight-same, $74.00.
Allen VS. Crummack ct ux-same,
$4,000.
Boyer VS. Viewer same, s2366.0O.
Phelps VS. Phelps-pltff granted decree
of divorce and care of minor child.
Lewis VS. Krefzinger-judgm for
pltff for $3526O.
Stems VS. Hagaman ct ux--same,
$26S.s5.
Walker VS. Hamilton-sahle, $50 90.
Sims Grocery Co. VS. Mcintosh
s9S1.92
National Loan s. Trust Co. VS. Baugh
and wife--same, S65.75.
Same VS. Miller ct al--same, S1182.5 SO.
Phoenix Mutual Life ms. Co. VS.
Zweizig- same, $6l0.
Robertson VS. Weide and wife-same.
$500.
SALES CONFIRMED IN CASES OF
Davis VS. Hoenig; Kansas Loan and
Trust Co. VS. Viewer, VS. Roberts, vs. d.
w. Cumins, VS. S. E. Cummins, VS. Sow
ards, VS. G. l.. Burnau, VS. John NJ. Bur
nau; Knox & Co. VS. Pickering ct al;
Gay VS. MoOrman; Whiteside VS. Scott
ct al; Schriwise VS. Baker; Merrimack
Savings Bank VS. Hughes; Able VS.
Norman ct al; Nelson VS. Hull, VS.
Price. VS. Williams; Mckinley & Hill
laker VS. Stevens, and same VS. Jones.
CASES CONTINUED.
Dunaway VS. Gilmore, and same VS.
Airheart, 10y consent; Lafferty VS. Co
Surveyor, Zutavern & Strobe VS. same
and Zutavern VS. same, by consent; Ba
ker VS. Reed, reference continued; Sau
| ders VS. Smith; Smith VS. O'Brien ct al
Parreth & Young VS. Lopotaska; al
cases in which Mitchell & Cottingtor
are plaintiffs; Carr. Scott & Co. VS. Hut
ten and Garverick; Corbin VS. Dunaway
and Diffenbacler, by consent; Bender
VS. Paris; Garverick VS. Byram; Rob
ertson VS. Phillips; Cole VS. Great Benz
| Land & Lot Co; and Cerney v.
Nicodeem.
! DISMISSED.
! Plaistea VS. Garverick, without pref
udice, by consent; Winstead Bros. v:
Richie, by agreement; Voorhees, ct a
VS. Smith 10y plaintiff; Bandy vs. Hughes