The Hawaiian gazette., 1889-08-20

gun -r -fz --zr- h7 Preston j
The 6=ss-lz-- NO So as III
It'd 81 r-s Hay Term Of the Or
cu7- Ce--r- Trz-5 J-,iiziaL Circuit.
for tha murder Of one Q-0E NsE
z-f 0-z Ak uz> charged In the
ssrls Indictment - az accessory
tss--s the Ea-1 te such murder aud
o-s Ten Ne-S VS. s->c charged II
me a-z indictment a. an s-esS-
So zf-s- r1z fzr-
To r-z> Indictment the defendant
6s-z--s5 On me f1-l-wIu- ErgCu6S-
Inst the Hawaiian CrIu-f1zL
Procedure Ac1 does NJ permit So
csSs1-ieS 20 os 51zlsc win the
principal unless chE-EsG WITH -rs
Substantive cEs-Ss-
Inst szf[ S-z-E-s does ug1 sCp-
-5e E1- joining aeeeS@o-Ess before
rhs Ezc- win scceS>l-i5> 5EIe- che
fsr1
& That the eEzrgs> 81 presented
s-z5-.s- n said Ak1 E-d tie said
Tea Yesk are uncertain - 70 par-i-
c-ar pizzs- tine and czrr-1-s1a1css
aid MT S-en l. Co give sad defend
zu-S cns opportunity ID meet SuL
Ezsz-5 themselves from the several
charges therein LzlI s-ziusI them
Its u-- sliced thar the Uur-
5sr az Q-1c Eer wzs murdered 1y
NO >1E In P-r>Lz-ez Of z1y at Of
Gsss-lf-- Ten E=az. more esps-
calls the ae- therein charged O
-z-5-l1cSy. I-El-s- procuring.
c--Z>ell-E- eoE-uz-ll1E o. hiring
-hz sa55 NC SOW the said murder
q a E-l eCE-IL
ne Cz-u-1- Cl--r uverrE-z5 tbs
dsuzr-s- s15 TIE defendants ez-
ceE-e6 ca s--E --LEEE
ne defendants >ev=-a--y pleaded .
. M guilty Oh the Indictment a-I .
s-5 ca>s came On for trial on the
-z-- Ny. s-l szs finished 81 ne
z1- when the 5-rv returned ve--
6i-- u nj guilty - CO the defend
ans Ak and Ten EseE and q
z-Z-y $ % the defendant We SOW
Co-usz f1- the defendant We
So excepted 90 t1z verdict - Be-
i1E eo-rlv % the law and tie
which exception VS. ST.
-eSeL-
EzrI11S eZcsF .l1-s Co the sIUz>-
80 y ev-5=-1e we're czz=E during
-L= -rzs- AID allowed but Wzre 1g5
E-=5
Izs rL@ Of g certain Chinese
Secret >lc5ezy called the zee Wo
Hog @ w-5-- the Csts-Ez11s
Ezre alleged 90 BE- members. and
z15,L society /. as alleged i-sc5-
Es-56 tE= murder. were prudueed
n evidence E1ersuuoa counsel
~ Ire Defendants moved that the
sz55 rules 6e Translated and the
.rz-s--I-i-- Ted Tor Es
ne Court refused 10 entertain J
Ee ugl1-- the p-ss5tizz Justice :
Eyi-E- II refuse the motion II the :
ga zCzE BE thereby Ez-zyad =
iD=-y C1= q this Request VS.
a1- give - That TIE Court inter !
-s-5r e1l-6 have completed Il II ;
z-z
LE= rules E=-= orally L-c6-F
o -Ls jury and were Afterwards :
rzEz-z-s6 and Ezd before The 1ase :
-=1I 70 -Ls 5EE !
Cease f7r the 6=t=z5a1ts sz- ]
spte1 a. s--E refusal and the :
were duly allowed !
; oil q exceptions IE sub :
allowed and signed 6y
* p-E=l1lzE J-=--e and 3 cupy q -
-e Indictment the evidence and :.
h demurrer were annexed z1d
z1s Eilr1 = tbs bill
T-= =L-=p-l1-s were argued zt :
IL present Tern b. J. 4 Naguou :
= tL= Defendant va SOW and 6y =
L A--crzey-t1-=- t.r the CrCvu- :
b -EE Cl-E---We VII deal !
tn the demurrer first :
he Ers- two Er11r.is raise the =
-@-5g- - y the right CD i1Icd=
e principal and accessories before -
u AFTER The Ezer In one Indictment !.
We fzE % see any reason Why :
~ sz115d u51 b 50 t151ed- Tie =
Il $ To rezgLz-= the practice and :
u prUceL1r= IN criminal cases. = :
a--I1z Il gives express authority
z This TIE reuzz1i1Z grounds
demurrer were ECs argued before :,
3 and refer only t3 Ah and Ten =
scE no were acquitted
We think the Clre1ic Court rs
zht II ovsrruIi1Z the demurrer &
a therefore the exception ou
= pant L Cve-rUL@i
The eLGeF-is1 20 the refusal Of
< CLru1ft Co1rr. Go allow the trans r
hon q the rules Of the Secret
c5sty - requested ezEEos b su-
md upon any principle O author
= We G1 u zee IN Ehzt r. II
Ell the defendant could have
en- pre5zdiced b. the course u
aptsd b. the Co1rt, and there
{ this excepsig1 must BE- over- ~
Sd tic
The rznziaing exception /. that a
: verdfet L eo1rzry 10 the kE III
tEe evidelce- for
The first gr0End insisted upon By det
IL - - 4 = T-4---.,--% = al ,--.---r -