The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1889-08-01

Fswex. rrxar, Rcd. r " yTnu-xsoas
Aessas J. Il EwhstzAai. schxss.sr. Saxrr,
IS 4. =. sAsadr. AnA Ss21es. Sali1vaa. L
= ~ hsf.axnfs TAsesss. TIARA Tu-u@-
Nszr, ~ss~snnzrgxr. wIAsl-aa. Winssr. NJ
{ rrxsS1@ns
Sses-scre@Sys. C-ez ses. ps,sxus. uarse
Sod Eaz- sss4v TRAITS, Hxarx. 5sfss
A-IsanAA NewAss. ssesea~su. sEa-4sx
e, sns, eakssaTf- ssass1vszs. r. {. kEssesees
Al ssus~ SAy1er. West
PrssSser usStrrd az ass<e<srrass NJ skxs ssths
ssnfs g ss sasezssd before ~ ~ hin xsor:
carried
AGAINST A sraxpaxs Asxs.
6esSzsza e<EsrsSs xhe sslsexsrsr sssssssi.,sss :,
sasTseo 20 tie ssll ~ ssgHsx
so staDGfag krEF snail re kept sn fsy
Fsis szase n fiEae os p~ssse. zss 10 .as sse-,
e.. n Fssne y r<aAes. ~ aaa-ser-t IA sny
nor n ttrae g var exc 81 IA he uss.ns.
prs- <rso~s1 BY law carried
rseueE moved m zsreDslnaeuf 70 xerssxsr
1s- 80 tS2f asrsa1 Jury shall Be summoned
once yeae. snms
ssEyrrr-s' rezxAl Fxo-xsr
G-s1trs moved 10 strike oar sll an .
wssd record. = in line ? section - 50 fax:
lass q ass< than twelve a ronrf esssro,
sVss.Fa ssfst!ss. ae1 trial hr jury cannos
sT saivess im ccrEsir eases Tss ,sss;iau
wss lost, L being in fAyar
E@Ea,ss essereE fne felsowsns rre.xx1
eeTSsy ot.seef tss s-iilns % sfs aesfoa sl
Re sszsvenszg.n tE ~ xssirg 20 strike eu- o.
s@rfaoa =. article Sn rzexsnhse ani hsil a!
figtsss 81 on sid See4ssn after the wote
rssora. n the ssecuz hae. ana desire
this protest. catered oa rssssrd
~ AIn Tasys&rsox CANALS.
Nafes naoved % strike ozf s-exrsst for
~ ssk ~4r.
rssassfe 70 p-p~-tv that Usy es cen
,sis eesl Tor rrfysse uSs + was urgec thai
lhs wonsa aisow she people OF Eastern
= asaIneson 20 ctg bitches Tor irr1xstlns
Gowey rsoves. n amend ey sfriking cut
'aEs aud the worsfs ''of neeessits Aoss-
N,a sae anlenfweE. af Mirfs. the ayes
afls Does were demanded. sns. the vote Fe-
sa.sec as follows. e fo- s. against. host
pEnhar moved to adj af.er the word
Eesfsslrv." in line 2 "sr3 for Ire rights
oi irrigstfnx car ais ard ,iisshess
Af'Sr discussion Tihhetfs nsavest that she
matter be rese-rei hssk 20 she Judiciary
com snfitsse that 4 report saiSkE e Alsdte on
rs legality
Turner hope, sss motion woasd 10. pre-
vail.
Moore moved the presSa,ss question: lost
Rsichsazn was ia doaht 50 20 the pro-
prssty of the amendment and advocates:
AZ tftet VI tie NFa mffEes-
klanesr was in favor ~ stisrosing os the
question nov. p. g. sullivan sna wa-ns
bored fhe ao'fon would prevail
II was carried
NEW ARTICLE TAKEN rF.
Bowen moved TO 20 into committee al
tee a hole 20 consider the srtfess on state
enrnry sud municipal Indebtedness
Over. 81 King. was rsslesi % the chair.
The article was resd - q hole snd then
taken rp by sections
THE LGsrr ov INDEBTEDNESS.
-Ssction l The state may. so meet cas-
uai d@tciis or failures ia revenues. ar for
expenses no, provided for. eorltrse. debts.
bssf such debts. dsrsc, snt eonfiaxens.
sngiy or in 'Ne aggregate shall nof At sny
time exce~d fcpr hundred thousand doh
isr~ fs 100 ,on0l, snd tire monevn arising froTn
the Trans creating such debts shall b. sr.-
Piled 20 the purpose for which they were
obtained or so rspsy the deiss ~ CONTRACTED
aud 10 no other purpose whatever"
skNogE ALL BARRIERS.
Gc<grove moved an auendmeu, 10 strike
out the words "bat such debts, direct ard
contingent, sinely or IN the aggregate.
sha'l cot a. sny fiue exceed ssOa .fa" Cos.
grove, in s8rp1rt n his amendment, de-
eisrsd that the state would so.sn end itself
prescribed In snch a rnanHer thati II would
be abe 10 do roshirg
Turner fhoHght the section iia 70. vn far
enougn; the weale section ought sn tss
ssriek cut Ee offered an ameudrr eut -
fh AT eject
Browne declared il Of the utmost irnpcr-
'anee 20 the future prosperity of the sste
that there be Limitation N its indebted
rsSs- In california -he limitation 10 xrn-
nsa New York 500 sn. Section 81 said
Mr. Browne. provides fer unlimited in
deht@dress fo- specific objects, THIS mat
te- ought to be- kept - near the ress,,Ie as
peSsih'e. ard the legislssHre should have
a iimit nlscet on its power"
Moore and Reed favored the rsuert az she
committee. Cos opposed IL. and Kin
mar thought II wise tn nlsre limit.
Durie favored 'he rceort of the com mIttee
SUBSTITUTE BY MINOR
Nino- offered an amendment. sussti.rf-
ing q part of section for section l. and
then af1isg section 20 s., The limit nf
Indebtedness was rsfsrd in the smend-
meat from 500 eco 81 S5eo.oe0
Tarf ef wss opposed 20 a limitation he
esuse the state would he csls.s prom Ia
erect many rev bsiidfngs He did not
think IL good rol'cv 10 have the rsAeple
vote Y pom every question Of sreefHe in.
dsbtessness. alt is bad policy he said
'to tie up the state in tnis manner.
venture 20 say that for every STATE that has
male limitation Of Indebtedness there
are three which have no limit"
NOT Az ABSOLUTE sUN.
y ssl ia favor of reasonable limitation
for purposes of general indebtedness.
said We r, but do not think il ought 20
b. ia dollars ard cents. II should he a Ger.
tain pToportior ef the taxable property of
fhs state .
stiles favored establishing the limit on
a sfiffe rent hssss frcsn fhas here proposed
He dec Jared that II the question cf public
buildings wss subtafttsd 10 the reople IL
wcula be def sted tecsBse of sectional in
tefests He wanted she matter left 20 the
discretion Of the legis aiaee
Weir ouered substi'ats that the limit
Of Indebtedness for general purposes be
per cpn.. of the taxable property cf the
siste.
It's inGorsed Minors substitute. IL
'hoacst there should he . limit, bur it
shoald be s~tO, go or 81 .etssosn "A resson-
ahis ilEnit.' ne said, would strengthen the
csssslt IF the state ia IL. markets ef ihe
w0r i
6.n ro'ian Of Eshelzsau tie cornialttee
arose.
The chair des gna'ed Mr. F. G. sullivan
tc take the chair surlng hss contemplated
slss nee in fte afternoon.
RES fak q Euf1t 2 n stts.ss.