The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1889-11-08
THE COURTS 81 Law.
Several Important TIL snits
filed Yesterday.
wosx or TIE COMMISSIONERS
zh<z srs rsfssssaea - So Hesns Mss'
as.<s.yea sszsxvlsi IN isse ceasssss-
..a 81 sa< Neu Courthouse.

I. - s,;issyses exstrs yeetss4sT sils case
- ii n Efsa - he 0regea Improve
es.sr. t'ssssraay wAs Etesi. The egsnFsasts
sslsgee tass ElY. HAL was Summoned ~
Msse~~r ssraag. 81 ffss coEapaay, = attend
go gosnsea. az sasrl0Ye ct tsse kpsasTss
-, 80. vsaeses eynapszsra tsaetsfre Of
- ..sss IT ssss rfget Leg hg Feseer q
,4ss4.saest s3sfaessSe = ssfEineFy. 1hs ssli
frrssef alls~ss that sbs ssstsgat Nas re-
ssssess g f'rosiasnee hsspitAi. aflf = : -
s.nsserssooxs t<swsea pSaEaisii asa ssssssss-
ensss r3ssreseataasYs that she sssassii7f
ss.x.ta assxnd toe Fsaisent nnsA hls fsegs-
svv, Tbs pgalafsS sIlsgea iBss fse visited
d. g4tsens continuously frsssn 9aHe =,
gssk assfs gas !. 80 Fof tbs sefvice he
nakk ssnsneFasgon a tAe sesa q s'ssz.s1.
ussssA sEefendsata Representatives hAs
xsssssfasslv fsfssed n Jay. Tbs platEtsH
tAsrsf0rs prars si4e segrt 70 ggASt Btns
fsssIrsss.gt fes flss slsess safn.
wtenael Address. plaintiff agalnst the
fksr cosl gosnpary haa brought saAt
IN ksss Ysssss cry ~ 8l92 on balance q Sc.
eessns Tor vert. labor and services PER
teruea fer TIE defendant, He asks 5aa1-
,Rsas ls5f the afsgse s4E4 Together viii ia
FER esssE. snte1ss& between May !, fssg. and
snfz =. 20
Asszos has f1sn sgusgtas ~ Jsmss Bssch
neaiass sFagaaas q IIaHg4IIsa and W !.
wallis. who sileees that between osi0oeE
- .ssa Nsgvsnser Q fssss. BE- sold and de.
lsserea - shs defendants battrr ard e9Es
10 The agnosst 81 Szsss 81, and that ONLY go
has been pad The plaintiff asks iadg-
g8ens for ne ssaianes.
Eaeafd 4. caldwell hes brought sat
szassss Thomas johnson, alleging tfIai
short Fehfnsry r. fsss. be was tlss ahso-
Iaie oNrer ii three esuifAets Tor the par.
thsas as rsal eztate. entered into hg tie
Nefshesn pscifa KAisFosd Company and
1ssnsY 4. Soiaw ans whieh had been es.
esxnef4 s. tetaw 70 him. The eonsyaete
weYe Iur lie purchase of land IN township
~ nas4is. range easI The plaintiff
7sssthz* hlieers tlfss on EebyHary a. is@1
H. Gold half Interest III uSs<aose contract.
H. tie dsIendant fer 81 0sb. ths sam 81
42Nn being paid ii cash - hiH,
assd the hsssaes tie defeniapt agreed q
paS "a he NoflhsSa Pacific company HiIefl
dae, ~ fsasuu Of an arrangement between
ftnsanH snd the latter company. Ausgrne.
sn3fsf vas lartlsef entered into by which the
sssfsm4ant ssrseei 10 pay 10 plaintiff enc
sahlE OF whatever kufn BE SHOULD selE bis
ssIsislan If the land for. ahlch ii
no e=se slauia he hess than 5000. Ths
painful nov snns DOR All accounting os
the property whlch waa sold, and whieh
kss passed through ssvsrai assignments.
We olaams the asleuasnt has not accounted
faf tfs pfoIsbig according to ths contract
and therefore asks Judgment from she
e1u9 far ala kee 81 lhe amount due him.
soIsssia Af-fss hsa broursss suit against
fhe rHset sot4ita si.oFe Railroad Company
nakitsk tiansgs h the sum Of 81 on. alleE-
iug thai sbe aeltxsfeA household goods 81
that saiie "a Tie defendant. sbo received
he SANS foE tranhpostaslon tFum ssaasle T.
Slaughter ansieft the laws uf a eaHmon
carrier TIE bill 4 A gellef for plaintiff o.,
tbr Tfuund. flses Il tfse defendant is uu.
lawfully holding III goods. and absolutely
fFfnnssa b. deliver 8egn ~ bes.