Mexico weekly ledger., 1889-02-14
CIRCUIT COURT.
A Big Batch of Business Disposed
Of on the Last Day-The
Proceedings.

WIG iouit hoiiuay III May, While
the case Of Miller and Mortimer
was continued until the June term
of Court. The indictment against
Pedestrian F. c. Garter for larceny
and emhezzlement was quashed.
The case against Garter for obtain
ing money under false pretenses
was continued until June and the
prisoners bail fixed at $3.50, which
he did not give. In the case of
State against Moydell, larceny, the
jury hung, ten standing for acquit-
tai and two tor conviction. The
detailed proceedings of
the Court are as follows:
State of Mo vs. James Marsh IL.
case continued on application de-
fendant on account absence of
witnesses.
State of Mo VS. John Spotswood,
case dismissed.
State of Mo VS. John Barkwell j,
forfeited, scire facias
to issue.
State of Mo VS. Jno w Dugan,
case continued on account absence
witnesses, prisoner recog-
nized on his own recognizance.
State of Mo VS. John Miller,
murder case continued on ap-
plication defendant for the want of
time to prepare.
State of Mo VS. George Mortimer,
same entry as Miller.
State of Mo VS. John Rodgers,
continued until 4th Monday IN
May for trial.
State of Mo vs. Fred Cunning
ham alias Fred c Carter, No 2,
larceny and embezlement, indict-
ment qnasned.
State of Mo vs. Fred Cunningham,
alias Fred c Carter, No l, obtain
ing money under false pretences,
case continued on application de-
fendant on account of absence of
material witness, bail fixed at $3.50.
State of Mo VS. Henry L Smith,
information fled by Prosecuting At
torney, continued to next time on
his own recognizance.
FIJI Cordner VS. John B Myers,
leave to defendant to answer in 60
days and continued.
Miss Jennie Hit VS. Simon Ian.
der, leave to defendant to answer
in 90 days and continued.
A Cough VS. F 7 Hulett, or
der of publication in Mexico LED
GER and continued.
Patrick Reynolds VS. Matthew
McGowan ct al, plaintiff takes
judgment and con
tinued.
Blrdsall Co VS. G E Baldridge
ct al, death of G E Baldridge sug-
gested and case continued.
J J Heizer VS. w E White,
attachment sustained, judgment for
plaintiff for the sum of s3O2. so.
D NJ Anthony vs. W H Beal
ct al, leave to defendant to answer
in 40 days and continued.
Ira Tincher VS. Chas B Burks, at
tachment sustained, interlocutoary
Judgment and continued.
J B Burks VS. Chas B Burks,
same as above.
Missouri | Smith VS. W II
McPlke ct al, proof of publication
made; interlocutory judgment and
continued.
W II Beal VS. H F Woodward
case dismissed as per stipulations
filed.
Abram Strauss & Co VS. J NJ
Smith, leave to answer il go days
and continued.
sc Hall VS. o F Settle, leave de
fendant to answer in 60 days ant
continued.
RI WiIburn ct al. VS. Bank Will
burn ct al. ., continued.
L Feger VS. VIM Sullivan, attach
ment sustained, judgment for dol
lars and judgment satisfied.
Leslie Hortley VS. James Orr et
al, goods claimed by the interplea
ders released;alias writ to -----
county for Isiah Wilson and con
tinued.
w H Barton VS. Jos NJ Smitl
ct al, plaintiffs dismisses as to F I
Turner leave balance to defendants
to answer in 60 days and continued
Coons & Turner VS. L II Nc
Alister, leave defendant to file an
swer 60 days before next term ant
continued.
Anna B LaMertfa vs. III I La
Mertha, order of publication il
Mexico LEDGER and continued.
James Elliott VS. E NJ Hogan
alias writ for defendant to -
county and continued.
Lydia F Herndon vs. Tripl
Alliance, leave to defendant to an
swer 60 days and continued.
Mack Stadler Il Co vs J \
Smith, leave to defendant to an
| swer go days and continued.
Einstein il Co vs. VIM Wolf ct al
interlocutory judgment and cor
tinued.
Thos A Bolts vs. c & A r f
leave to defendant to file answer i
60 days and continued.
James Wetton VS. Lycurgr
4