Pittsburg dispatch. [volume] (Pittsburg [Pa.]) 1880-1923, 1889-03-15
THEY ALL OBJECT.
RemOnStranceS Against Liquor Lii
censeS Pour Into the Court.
MOST OF THEM ARE GENERAL.
a Case of Treasure Trove Tried in the
Temple of Justice Yesterday.
PLENTY OF LEGAL BUSINESS JUST NOW

eenth, Nineteenth, Twenty-nrst and Ihlrty-
sixth.
In the Eighteenth ward but one remon-
STRANGE was received, and that against Peter
Miller of Butler street extension. The paper
is signed by 50 persons, and sets forth that 'the
applicant habitually violated the law during
the time he has had license, by selling liquor
on Sunday and since the last time he was re-
fused license he has peddled and sold beer in
bottles from wagon throughout the commun-
ity of the Eighteenth ward.
Renonstrances we're filed against Is appli-
capts in the Nineteenth ward. They were all
general remonstrances alleging that the houses
for which licenses are applied are mot neces-
sity" and that the applicants are unfit per-
sons to engage in the business" The follow
ing are the persons demonstrated against, the
figures given after the applicants location in
dicating the number of slgners to his remon-
STRANGE:
Charles Neef, 6ON Penn avenue, IA; Adolph
Trauger, A Frankstown avenue, SO; Lewis
Christ, 81 Frankstown avenue, 50; Joseph Nc
Kee 6S4S Penn avenue, rs; Peter Lauerman, St
Frankstown avenue, IS; Fred Mausmann, 6347
Station street. rs; Jos. Fleming, 49 Frankstown
avenue, rs; Melkar Balli 5l2S Penn avenue, 60;
Timothy Barrett, 602 Penn avenue, rs; John
Jacob Arnodt, 155 Frankstown avenue, 75;
Jacob Schulz, l2S Frankstown avenue, 90;
Nicholas Leech, l04 Frankstown avenue, IS:
henry Luchsinger, n FTankstown avenue, %;
John F. Canister, Y Frankstown avenue, 81;
Henry Schusler and Cyrus Pool 10 and Il
Frapkstown avenue, 81; John A. Klipham, 1914
Station street, 81; Peter A. Canister, IS and 81
Frankstown avenue, 7S; Anton Wolf, 6OO7 Penn
avenue, 20, and Henry Meyer, Broad street, 76
A DIAGRAM WITH ONE.
In the Twenty-hrst ward l6 applicants are
demonstrated against These are similar to the
papers filed against the Nineteenth ward ap-
plicanrs. They are signed generally by the
same persons. The following persons are
demonstrated against:
B. B. Mcdowell, Penn and Brushton ave-
nues, 1888; Thomas Mulvehill, 7O4 Tioga street,
lS2; Anton Menikers 53S Homewood avenue,
us; John Kerner. Grazier street. l8S; Joseph NJ
Railroad street. 49, John A. Miller, 3SS Franks
town avenue, IS; Bertha Heinz $50 Franks
town avenue. IS; Frank Mismyer 307 Larimer
avenue, q; William Dursan, 306 Frankstown
avenue, 55: Theo. Neiss, 200 Larimer avenue,
77; Victor Miller, 22l Frankstown avenue, so; ].
H Husman, Putnam and Railroad streets, IS;
H. ]. Brauthoover, 264 Frankstown avenue, So;
Joseph Kruer. sos Larimer avenue, 79, and Jer-
ry Bacon, 26S Franzstown avenue. S. The re-
monstrances against John A. Miller and Ber-
tina Heinz were accompanied with diagram Of
the block in which their places are located,
which shows that two other saloons are in the
same square, and the applicants are but a
square from the Lincoln schoolhouse:
In the Thirty-sixth ward five of the appli-
cants are demonstrated against in a general
way nothing special against any of them. They
are: Morris Gibausky, l95 Main street. 5S; JON
athan Hay, 2O9 Main street, 20: George KIlmer,
$50 Main street: Charles Turnblacer, 124 Wa
bash avenue, 6S; Charles Sellers. 172 Main, 55;
William Gundlefnger, 1l3 Steuben street, s.
TEMPTATION FOR THEOLOGY.
Only two wards in Allegheny were heard
from the Second and Sixth. The officers of
the Theological Seminary sent in special
remonstrance against Adam Heyl, of is and %
Buena Vista street. The paper sets forth that
in the educational institution is assembled
large number of young men, and in the judg-
ment of the remonstrants the establishment of
drinking places in the vicinity will be casting a
needless and possibly hurtful temptation in
their way: There was also general remon-
STRANGE filed against William Heyl, signed by
81 residents of the Second ward.
Remonstrances are filed against IL of the ap-
plicants of the Sixth ward. They are: Barbara
Herzenroder, l5S Washington avenue, 90;
Sophia Braun. S26 CHARTERS street, 81; Theresa
Heyl, llS Juniata street, s2S: Charles Kraucher,
$50 Beaver avenue, 5; John Kelly, 3l7 Beaver
avenue, 8: John Sh0rr, l6l Junlata street A;
John E. Windle S97 Beaver avenue, A; Joseph
Mark All Beaver avenue, "A; George Schaffint,
2S2 Franklin street, A; Henry Lober, l5S Mar
ket street, A; Joseph Jaukowski, Sedgwick
street, 40.
The remonstrances came in from the bor-
oughs with, a rush, with McKeesport in the
lead Papers were filed against 46 applicants
of this borough. They are general remon-
strances, gotten up mostly by the w. c. 7. q.
people. The reason generally assigned is that
they are not necessary for the accommodation
of the public and entertainment OF strangers or
travellers. Following are the names of and the
number of signers against the applicants:
First wardeMrs. .MargaretBreitfnger 100: Dan
iel Butler l02 Jas. Berlin, 100; A. j. Carver 104
VIM. ]. Denny, 9S; Charles Fechter, 104; VIM
A. Kelly. lOl; Robert T. Carothers, 100; Frank
Becker 100; Samuel E. Carothers. 9s; George
Altmeyer, l0l; Jacob Hugo. SO; George NJ.
Leipzig 10l; Frank Logan. los; Louis n. Nor
gan i0i: Bernard Morris iO2; Luke Lynch, 1OO
Peter Koch, 100 Bennett Harr, l04: VIM. Nc
Kay, 100; Patrick Nolan, 104; Peter Speilman,
80; Ernest Bercherbach, l0l; p. w. Schmidt,
81; Nicholas Wolf, SO: w. +. Weiskircher, 103;
Iouis WiuEelman. l00
Second ward-F s. Busch, ZIG; Frank Ferri-
gan, Z79; Michael Maloney, 2Sl; John Steinhil-
ber 276: Mrs. Barbara Zimmerman, 276
Third ward-Pauline Auberle, 120 George P.
Beech, lis; William Busch, 122: James Crosby.
123 William Dean, l2O; Fred Eggley, III; Sc
3sstan EngIert !S; S;o E6waFd EOItchte I2o I9a
Konrad Hausman. 1l9; Catherine Hester l2S;
William Knee, l22; Dennis Mill 10.
BoRoUGHs AND TOWNSHIPS.
Braddock came in for good share of re-
monstrances. One paper signed by 19 persons
states that the saloon of John N. Walters, in
the First ward, is located on the Baltimore and
Ohio Railroad, and that several persons in an
intoxicated condition have been killed
R sRran6e 6ee against fsy owen II oNe Of demGn fSe
same ward. signed by Is people, state
that there are six liquor houses in that ward
now, and that Mr.. O'Neil is but one of.the
seven new applicants. A paper, bearing 20
signatures, against Martin McNally states that
his place is also on the railroad and that peo-
pie have been killed near his place while under
the influence of liquor. The others against
whom remonstrances are filed, are:
First ward-John A. Hand, "a; Luke Gordon,
20; Alex Ellis, 20: w. M Britt 10: Daniel Gal
lagher, 20; Joseph Love, IL; Michael Quirck, I6;
P. F. Murray, IL: James F. Ward, l6; T. D.
Second ward-E. F. Kelly IS; Thomas Cox,
IS: John Costello. 81; William Ketterer 40;
James Quinn, 40; Helena Zimmerman, 40; F. r,
DarlgTeer. 40; ]. T. Morrow, 40.
There were remonstrances against l3 sppli-
cants from CHARTERS borough, as follows
Henry Hanna, 30; D. Lutz & Son, 81; Jacob
Ruppel 80; Julius Gottfried, 81; Morgan Thom-
as, 80; Michael O'Keefe, so; Adam Nusser 81;
Joseph Paul; 4S; NJ. D. silkknitter, 81; Emil
Grimm, 81; Patrick Connors, 81, and Joseph
Adams, zS.
Eleven remonstrances were filed against
Millvale borough applicants They were; Ja-
cob Lichtinger, 43; Anton Schneiderlochner,
43; Samuel Young. 100; Jacob h. Walker, 100;
Henry Wagner, 100; Mary c. Reder, 100; Joseph
Miller, 100; j. w. oesterIing 20 and Adam
Five applicants from Verona borough are
demonstrated against. They are: Henry Berg,
rs; Henry Elkins. 81; Samuel Ritter, IS; Fred
B. Voltz, IS; Alex Nader, a.
The remonstrances from the townships were
even greater in numbers and of a1nore damag-
ing character to the applicants than those from
the boroughs. There seems to have been a spe-
cial effort made in Harrison township against
the applicants for license. The Women's Chris
tian Temperance Union and the Law and Order
Society send in general remonstrance against
all the applicants in the township. Then there
are special remonstrances against l3 of the ap-
plicants. The papers, after setting forth
the reasons why licenses should not be
granted, invite the Court to consider the char
acter of the remonstrants and petitioners. and
earnestly insist on the ground of superioritI
of the number and character of the remon-
strants to that of the petitioners, that the
licenses should be refused.
Remonstrances were also filed against petit
fioners in the townships of Stowe, Shaler,
CHARTERS and North Versailles.