The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1889-04-25
SUPREME COURT.

Verdict Tor rIainttn In JoItva -. Kaulu-
kou- Calendar OF Appeals FOR Cham
hers To-day.
Before Mr. Justice Dole at term, We'd
ncsday, the case Of Frank Joliva vs.. J
l.. Kaulukou was tried. 1t was assump-
sit for 1928, for work and labor done in
building a house. {. Creighton for
plaintiff; A. Rosa for defendant. The
case was tried last term, but only result
Ell in disagreement OF the jury. On this
/ occasion the following mixed jury were
1 empanelled: J. Paakaula. +. z. Low,
! Z. X. Keau, J. w. Naukana, w. Win
/ chester. w. Edmonds, 4. F. Cooke, 7.
/ May. +. \. McIneruy, J. X. Wilder, Q.
[ Branch, c. Brown. They returned q
verdict for plaintiff for 500, two dissent
ing. The Court adjourned for the day
at , sop. m.
AT CHAMBERS.
Before Chief Justice Judd, the petition
OF W. II. Cummings, guardian OF W. c.
Cummings, a minor, for license to sell
real estate, was partly heard and con-
tinued-W. c. Achi, attorney, and the
petitioner in person appearing. The
real estate in question i parcel OF land |
ut Wailuku, containing an area OF 3 81 /
100 acres.
APPEAL DAY.
The monthly hearing OF appeals from |
the lower courts OF Oahu will take place |
before Chief Justice Judd to-day. Fol-
lowing is the calendar:
The King vs.. Geo. L. Edwards. As
sault. Appeal from District Court, Wai-
amaze.
The King VS.. Tan You. Assault. APP
peal from District Court, Waianae.
The King vs.. All Young ct al. Gam
ing Appeal from District Court, Wal
amaze.
The King VS.. All Lee alias All Choy,
and All Ho alias All Yong. Appeal
from Police Court, Honolulu. q. *.
Wilder for defendant.
The King VS.. Achiona. Assault and
nolulu. J. l.. kaulukou for defendant.
Tie King VS.. Alex. Louis. Malicious
mischief. Appeal from Police Court,
Honolulu. d. Dayton for prosecution
5. X. Kaeo for defendant.
Hamilton Johnson vs.. JOaO d'Oliveria.
Assumpsit, $50 so. Plaintiffs appeal
from Police Court, Honolulu. c. Creigh-
on for plaintiff; Y. Y. Ashford for de-
endant
A. Kauhi VS.. J. Cooke. Assumpsit,
,25. Defendants appeal from District
Court, Eva. w. G. Achi for plaintiff;
". Q. Smith for defendant.
A. Morgan VS.. Frank Cunha. As
,umpsit, 500 %. Plaintiffs appeal from
Police Court, Honolulu. w. G. Achi for
plaintiff; A. Rosa for defendant.
All Chez vs.. J. IL. Soper. Assumpsit, (
IA 35. Plaintiffs appeal from Police
Jourt, Honolulu. Y. Y. Ashford for
Plaintiff; c. Creighton for defendant.
d. kaleialii vs.. kekuawela. TrOver.
DEFENDANTS appeal from Police Court,
honolulu. G. Creighton and A. 2. Pet
rson Tor plaintiff; w. 0. Smith for de-
andant.
y. }. Lopez vs.. c. 1. Brito. Assump-
it, 800 Defendants appeal from
'oice Court, Honolulu. c. Creighton :
)r plaintiff; p. Neumann for defendant.
L. B. Thomas vs.. F. II. Redward. v
.ssumpsit. $40 %. Defendants appeal I
-om Police Court, Honolulu. d. Dayton
u plaintiff.
Young Now vs.. J. H. Soper. Re-
levin. Defendants appeal from Police
curt Honolulu. V. V. Ashford for
laintiff.
f. II. Redward vs.. f. B. Thomas.
ssumpsit, $191 90 Plaintiffs appeal
rom Honolulu Police Court. d. Dayton
II defendant.
Jose NJ. Pedro VS.. J. r. Holt, Jr. AS
1mpsit, $36. Defendants appeal from b
'olice Court, Honolulu. J. a. Magoon /
or plaintiff; \. Rosa for defendant. 5
James Gay VS.. J p. Mendonca. As
Impsit, 1888 -. Plaintiffs appeal from
'oIice Court, Honolulu. c. Creighton =
)r plaintiff; &. /. Garter for defendant.