Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1889-11-14
Department One.


WEDNESDAY. November Is, 1889.
Court met pursuant 10 adjournment. Present
Paterson. j., presiding; Works, j.; Fox, j.;
Williams. Deputy Clerk; Washburn, Bailiff.
13,476-Estate of Hiiliard-Pursuant to ipu-
la:ien on file, ordered appellant be allowed fif-
teen days to file brief, respondent twenty days
to reply, appellant fifteen days to reply thereto;
cause to be lhereupon submitted.
1349i-Colusa County VS.. Hudson-On motion
of AcKune, ordered respondent be allowed
thirty days to file brief, appellant twenty days
TO reply; cause TO be thereupon submitted.
lS,SSs-Coogan rs. Haggin ct al.-UPen filing
abandonment and waiver, it is ordered that The
appeal herein be and the same is hereby dis
missed.
13,459-Hewlett VS.. Pitcher ct al.-There be-
ing no appearance or points or authorities on
file for appellant, it is ordered that the order
herein be and the same is hereby affirmed.
13,59i-CleghoTn VS.. Zumwalt = Argued by
Evans for appellant and submitted.
20,5T0-People VS.. Smario-0n motion of At
torney- General, ordered appellant be allowed
twenty days to file brief, respondent twenty
days to reply: cause to be thereupon submitted.
2O,596-People VS.; Beaverton motion of AT
torney- General, ordered that appellant be al
loweu htteen days TO file brief, respondent ten
days to reply; cause to be thereupon submitted.
l., S9S-Tremain VS. Barney ct al.-On motion
of Baker and pursuant to stipulation on file, it
is ordered that the appeal herein be and the
same is hereby dismissed.
20,597-People VS.. Religion motion of At
torney General, ordered that cause be submitted
upou briefs on file.
20,592-People vs. Rogers-Argued by Herrin
for respondent and submitted
IL, 56S-Stra ton VS.. California L. and L. Co.
Motion by Evans to advance cause and place on
calendar denied
Adjourned until 10 A. N. to morrow.
Department Two.
WEDNESDAY, November IS, 1889.
Court met at 10 A. N.
Present-Thornton. j., presiding; Mcfarland,
j.; Sharpstein, j.; Paulsell, Deputy Clerk; Rus
sell. Bailiff.
q, 60l-People VS. Wong All Hing-On motion
OF Attorney General Johnson and there being
no appearance nor points and authorities on
file for appellant, it is ordered that the judg-
ment and order herein be and the same are
hereby affirmed.
12,995-CalhoIn vs. Warder-Pursuant to stip-
ulation, ordered cause be continued TO May
term 1890.
20 5SS-Yeople VS. Cline-On motion of Attor-
ney-Gei e al, ordered appellant be allowed
twenty days to file brief, yondent ten days to
reply; cause to be thereupon submitted.
13,3S5-Clarke VS.. Brown ct al.-Pursuant to
stipulation, ordered cause be submitted upon
briefs on file.
20,593+People vs. Mullings-Cause argued by
Herrin for appellant, Deputy Acknowledgement
Johnson for respondent, and submitted.
l3,465 Mclean vs. Crow On motion of
Fulkerth, ordered appellant have twenty days
after the filing of the decision and petition to
prove exceptions in The Gaze of Crow VS.. Minor
Judge, respondent twenty days thereafter TO
reply, appellant ten days to reply thereto; cause
to be thereupon submitted.
13.4l2-Frankel vs. INSTRUMENTATION to
strike transcript from the files argued by Gale
for respondent and submitted. Motion denied.
Ordered appellant have twenty dsys afteI the
filing of the opinion ON petition to prove excep-
tons, respondent twenty days theI eater to re-
ply, appellant ten days to reply thereto cause
to be thereupon submitted.
1S.274-Fox ct al. vs. Stockton C. H. and A.
Works-Cause argued by Dudley for appellant,
|, Campbell for respondent, and submitted.
Is, 4e9-Alexander vs. Jackson-Motion to dis
miss appeal argued by Hszen for appellant,
Maddux for respondent. Ordered respondent
be allowed ten days to file brief, appellant ten
days to reply; cause and motion to be thereuI on
submitted.
Adjourned until to morrow at 10 AN.