The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1889-09-27

can tadict this man aithoart yen hare reported
do that S1s% ~
The attorney general ssxrsss tsaf The .r.rn.
uon OF The Bar Associasion be called So snst
"sHefs ana my object in shese remarks is 10
cal. the attention OF the members Of tie Be- A.
.oeiGtion 10 shis- II seems 10 me that the re-
cen OF The Bar Assorsst on ourh. 70 have
anoskn PRIDE In their profession 10 prompt
-. - 20 sone tors.her and consult sne take
psofef asslon, and NOT ies . member guilty Ct
,se grave ofcnse charged agsfnss Mr. xrwifr 20
1sHs.n 10 TIE prosessioa . disgrace 10 II. srf.
oh saa other hand, no, to allow auy false
sesfses against a brother member 81 tbs bar to
&c ms q aod persisted ia without gyosGs hin
"a opportunity TO vsncfcxfe hsEsesf Ihore the
nemb-H OF the bar viii consider this matter
AMI set upon t. an gosrg further. lam 20
i1g 10 throw down the gauntlet I an
sosDg 70 ehsIergs the newspapers anf
Poificsl orators ard the eitlxers al
ms county to 10 their duty in this 70 alter and,
u 'hese things be tree 70 come for xsra snd ffgd
sD'ns one that viii make sn AFFIDAVIT that they
ere True. or ~ issst believe theyare true and 10
DHRs mat AFFIDAVIT into cosrs and win proceed
20 have thls matter fairy treated AID nave TIE
ruth xscertasnsd and insstee done. After this
" no sworn complaint can Ee Sled in court II
no sfae VIII come forward and make a charge IN
court over his signature and with an atedgvss
Ar seviin 10 entitled To sssr1 before this enYn-
mauit! g. fully yineiea;es, because no one
woa!d make charge against hItn Ia legal form.
III ina complaint Is made I viii refer IL 20 the
grand jury. or VIII proceed against a!Ga for
eonfesnps OF court. or proceed sxzins him 20
aisear him or 70 oasi him from eesce.
THE GEAsD JURY RECALLED.
On account Of the large number OF per-
sons In custody charged with penal Of
lenses, all Of whom have been arrested
since the az iournment OF the grand Jury.
the court issued an order recalling The same
jury TO convene next Thursday morning a..
10 O'Clock. IL is supposed that the Sewlin
matter will be one OF the subjects for in
vesiigation.
THE ELECTRIC ROAD BLOCKADE.
The Injunction SUI, OF the Seattle Fee
trio Raiisay and Power Company against
Isaac Bloomquist. growing o., OF the esiort
OF tie latter 20 blockade the former track.
came up for hearing in chambers ct /
O'Clock IN the afternoon. The plaintiff as
represented by Preston, AlbeFtson & Don
worth. and y. soderberg appeared for the
defendant. After hearing argument. of
counsel. Judge Hanford continued the
order until further hearing, which viii
probably be had on Saturday.
While Judge HAnfort old not enter INTO
the merits OF the dispute, he said .hGs the
tesendants had laid themselves criminaliy
liable for obstructing the railroad. even II
1t did run over land owned by them with
out their consent; that frequently in this
court men had been punished severely for
interfering with the operation of railroads
that had been bslit across land without the
consent OF the owners thereof and
without proper legal steps 10 condemn the
'., and that obstructing railroads is a
I =. no matter who owns the land over
/ a it runs. The coart also said that
| tie defendants could also he punished
/ criminsiiy for attempting to obstract, and
| could be compelled 10 give bonds for good
behavior.
OBJECTIONS TO ArfRAfsERs' aEpoRT.
| Two objections have been flied 10 the re-
| port OF the appraisers In the Second street
condemnation proceeding. filed with the
clerk OF the court on September Il.
| Clarence and Eleanor Hanford. owners
| of the southerly two-thirds Of lot I. Of block
| 26. A. A. Denny's plat said lot of land
being s0xi20 feet in size. aud worth to-
| gether with the tenement and appur-
tenances therennto belonging, the sum OF
| IS, 600. claim 10 be damaged by the reason
| of the condemnation proceedings in the
sum of Sl.2Jo
Charlef Neil and Barbara Neff owners OF
the southerly third OF lot 6. and the north
| eriy third of lot 7. block 81. A. A. Denny S
plat, said 10, OF land being 40xi20 feet in
size. and with tements and appnrtenances
thereto belonging, worth $500, claim 10
be damaged in the sum of 81 80 by reason
OF the condemnation proceedings.
The appraisers did not award To either OF
the parties any damages whatever. and
these suits are brought tor the purpose OF
bringing the question before jury.
STIR FOR DIVORCE.
Mary Cutler flied complaint in an action
for absolute divorce from her husband
William l. Cutter. to whom she was mar
ried on or about January 10, 1879. a, Mount
Pleasant, Mich. She alleges that on OF
about November Is, 1880 ut Mount Pleas
ant Mich, her husband deserted her and
their one child and has since failed TO pro
vide for them. She asks in addition To 8
decree of divorce for the custody of the one
minor child the issue of the marriage.
FORECLOSURE rsocgEpISGs.
William sebv has brought suit against
Matthew Rxcine TO foreclose mortgage
given To secure q note for $3.50, OF date o
Angus; %, isss.
David Ferguson flsd a suit against VII
liam and Sarah Edwards 10 ioreelose 1
mortgage for 81 800, given 10 secure note
bearing date of March q, 1850
George A. Morrison filed suit agains
Hamilton & Millett. the Island county log
gers, 10 recover 1854 on promissory not,
given for that amount on February l.. lss9
to secure payment for logs sold the defen
dants by the plaintiff.
THE TRIAL CALENDAR
The following three eases, set down 10
trial. were called and postponed on motor
of attorneys COLA. Thomas II. Campbell
W.. James Rowland: 6e67. the County o
King W. James Rankin, 6,0sl. J. 7. Beadl'
vs.. f. L. Davis ct al. There being M
other cases ready for trial the court al
iourned at III O'Clock after hearing fee
motions.
Today calendar calls for the following
eases a $50, William Hewson vs.. Mechan
! les Mil Company; 6,os5, l.. Il. Andrew
vs. William CoClrane,
GUARDING AGAINST FIRES.
Chief Mcdonald and Assistants uuntin.
For Iunaminshie Localities.
| Chief Mcdonald il making his uSua