New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1889-10-10
DEPUTIES DECLINE TO RECEDE.
THE DEBATE ON THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM REPORT
AGAIN PROLONGED.

AGAIN PROLONGED
At morning prayer in ST. Georges Church yesterday
the Rev. Henry L. Badger, of Southern Ohio OBLIGATED
Bishop Knlckerbacker of Indiana, pronounced the
benedicton In the House OF Deputies two messages
were received from the House Of Bishops announc
ing the Bishops in the action in relation
TO the changes in the Prayer Book taken thus far
by the lower house. The second contained the notice
of the appointment by the House of Bishops, Of the
following Committee the Provincial System: Presid
ing Bishop Williams and the Bishops OF Texas central
New-York, Pennsylvania and Kentucky.
The Committee on the Admission of New Dioceses
reported adversely in the cases of Nebraska, which
wanted 70 have part of its diocese made a separate
missionary jurisdiction and of Michigan, which asked
for similar arrangement DR.. Henckcl, chairman
OF the committee, said that it was not because tho
committee thought that the requests of the dloceses
should not be granted that II reported as 1t did, but
sImply because il thought that what was asked could
not be granted constltutlonaly. An amendment 10
the constitution was needed 10 cover such cases, and'
under the clcumsta he asked that the committee
be discharged from further consideration OF the
memorials Of the two dioceses. The House agreed
10 This with the understanding that the matter should
be taken ND in another form at later stage of the
proceedings
nv permission of the House. the Committee of Con-
ference on the dsagrechg action OF the Two houses
with reference to resolution VIII, in regard to the
PRAYER Book reported as recommending to the House
bNNOH9'NA
with view to concurlfng with inc
action of the House OF Bishops, which
adopted the alteration under resolution Viii
The Rev Dr. Samuel Hart, Of Connecticut, moved
that the House Of Deputies should recede rom us
former action the resolution and concur with the
House of Bishops and that the alteration In the Book
of Common Prayer proposed under resolution VIII
should be adopted
In the discussion that followed. the Rev. ]. n.
blanchard, of Michigan, said he would be sorry To
have rubric In the Prayer Book about which there
was so much divergence Of opinion lie SAD tha'
although he had signed the report he reserved the
liberty OF voting against its adoption DR.. Goodwin.
OF PENNSYLVANIA, asked If affirmative vote meant
thu. resolution VIII would be adopted The presi-
dent replied that the appointment of a committee on
conference annulled all previous action, ana thaf
when their report presented the only question was
concurrence noncOncurTcnce in the report OF the
committee In this instance the committees report
recommended the House TO recede from us acuoh OH
the With resolution.
The Rev DR. Reese F. Alsop, of Long Island,
held that the House, II It adopted resolution VIII,
would take step backwards that might ultimately
result in the interests of restriction in the use OF
part Of the service with respect TO which they all
wanted more liberty. He trusted that the House
would not
The president said he would glad be corrected
by some one more skilled In parliamentary law than
be- wrong, but 1t was his opinion that the quesuon
OF concurrence or nonconcurrence was the Only one
before the House.
When at length the vote taken, by rollcsll
OF the doceses the resolution TO recede was lost by
q decisive majority.
The order of the day was next called for This
.s the consideration OF the report OF the Committee
en- the judiciary System OF the Church, which was
,pterrupsed by the adjournment on Tuesday Mr. Judd
az Chicago. having the floor Hill Burgwln said that
he WIS authorized by the committee to accept the
srsn0ment offered by the deputy from Pennsylvania
N, Goodwin. This amendment provides for two
80 ebzoges which make the resolution
,t<t, Then Mr. Judd announced that he was for
"A. resolution or the report, and hoped that 1t would
be sc0p'ed
yoseph Psekend. st.. a lay del,g gate, from Maryland
,,1ke sgsnst The adoption Of the proposed amend
-, srff Il sd0pted." said he, the General Con
-. ,st have sboru itSen Of some Of IT'S powers.
a.. ,loy. Of APPEALS Insy turn out some sort Of
s.eY An eeeIeslSstcz Prsukenstein. causing trouble
>. ,hes> who started ~ J. ". Woolworth Of Ne
brsskz sao1osr lay deputy spoke strongly lot INC
,,,,>,s,fD,. ysf0es Mcconnell. Of Lonislana, PoEe
.xssusa n, s<1 ne REV. Dr. Egsn, Of Central New
Ye,k for tbe resolution. Er sAsh Of Sew-forA
s,ssssag "a svpDor4 u f. pointsn out that all that
= .,oy1s1 81 me yroposed amendment was that
"a. ,1s a sfyfr1 gy.s1ytsret mi2ht De regulated by
49, 1sosrsa Convention. 4Thst Is the question:
80 AZ. sal shosls y mt be reyulsledT
"a. rez Ffe1sre ". TsyloF, Of springfield moved
.ess<a<ot - me resolution Of the Joi6i Committee
,1,e,sI Eels,tDns DJoySdine tkst sitsr ne words
T.A.teotlop N tEe 10oese' - ne PrypDse1 issoiu'
s.og tsge sbOD1 Le sVDejt1hs ne sefos " ~ ~ ,
b's.tsV III Syoysnce N tbs CLWch Ills mohoa
~ setobIs5, an M. Tsylof sY1,sss y ~ ..,d thu.
az Fey Df T. q Eo1Dfy, ~ BDbsH's, ssi1 Us ~
"A - .ets,,{ befOTe ne house We not hlyHDp' ~
s.sr e sisa 10 hsge the opportunity " mDYihR VIC
~ Eas5iy4<. Tbst fbs Committee On HmsD1msee De
tst,..cls1 70 faQuITe BbetyJ, bDdef uie plSssDt ~
s.i4sil,u tAs gL,vse of BislDDs fan ~ tvhsvNinI
ens,st N atueas fun dieofsau fDubUs ann epHgsn
xns u1,I QUESTION: " 1octfDei and " iDi W p5Dm
49, to t,e Constitution siiefl ~ tbh sllSN
- sss1 ~, ~ lioase IL Blfb0DS whenever efiky.