The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1889-11-30
m SUPERIOR COURT
4. Baxter Iron Building In.
junction Heard.
lcE ssLooN 1857 AGAIN
- . carry Ask - Hare shs city
...,ses rrom Moving r. Before
nsy f--oshsr saIfs.

:. - rapsrior conrt yesterday Judge
.'.<4.~zesr beard arguments In TIE In
49, xasf bsougbt ~ =. Baxter %
- - essy Of Seattle from interfsr-
3. - ne construction OF corrugated
=. .ss4:nss On YesssF avenue near The
-. 4 south Fifth street. The srRu-
.'s = IL rsalntln wAe that tlse ortii-
/ u. s111IhlfiEs the construction Of sach
I 49, i invalid. The court took she
-. ssdxf sdvis<ment.
9xt fkxkcs sAfooE TxsT suIr.
mr.,<mentAl complaint was filed yes-
~. s he case Of II. Ksnward and w
! l1rrx. sxxinst the city Of Seattle and the
: 1870 lyeslmens Company. This
I I. 800 ss restrain The city Of Seattle
- r-.<cring tsnt occupied By the paI-
9. ...sar. on the northwest corner Of Sec
ca - ckerry streets, before May 1. 1880,
7. - sse condiiions set forth by 81 or
! - 4 he city council which, noswith-
4 5000 "a own decree, threatens TO dis
.-s<s - plsIntiffs Of their rights The
1870. essim ghsf the Washington In
s<sr6t Company IL behind the city In
81 ,rsson, a. II wishes to erect building
8 ia Drs;slses.
srrr nsES coNyEYkacg.
- <zse Of Philip Wat against @. w.
rsst1l. sss also argued yesterday before
,s5r< flehsenherg. The plaintiff trsns-
800 oersnia propsrsy 70 the defendant In
q s,1eet 81 debt The debt being salts
81 s d plaintiff alleges. he asked for Q
e.uoyeg2tsce of the property which was
.f.s<a TIE claim set forth by che plain
=. xssosseg Il that the tranfer was In the
..1sse 81 mortgage and not deed. The
- - rot finished and was continued 70
seflos TO REcnsER Moakg.
/ zssi was brought By Claude II. Hig-
<sz sxsless Charles +. Reed, Joseph ID.
snirs' b 4. Banshu. w. ID. Mcconnell.
s~re u. hsAefts. Harry y. Parker and
81 & fofbeit, Tor ths recovery Of promis-
~ aes< tof $40. for which mortgage Of
Hssan property was given 90 secure the
500 he defendant, Reed. refused % pay
+ y Ell. md transferred his property 10
IL n<deisndanss, making himself irssoi-
fSSk Isdrmsnt Il asked 10 recover the
szearf doe from tbs defendants named In
= bcslea-
sos wHfrr KEEKAsxp.
I 81 Whitsss release vas secured It $50
fsaek yesterday. His attorney appeared
sdns Justice Miller as that hour with an
<ssr from The superior court. directing
&H1ies reiease, upon presentation Of q
Fp1<riy exscuisA bond. The attorney
5szfsa g. n. Boman and Gamma Foncin
+ j sassties fer the $500 bond. They were
ksspssd snd The prisoner was ordered re-
mrs scmrxpEa APPSsis.
II he case Of Mrs. L. v. Schuyler. who
! - nnfd 30 In Justice MiileF's court for
E<'Anr liquor without sseense, an appeal
] - t2ken 10 tbs superior cont An APP
ia bond vas filed for siH0. with ]. Kreil.
ssInsr. I. v. sehayder and Charles
naz a surstses.
srsr ron nkMAars.
John 7. 0arno brought suit against the
&eisls Electric Light Company, In Justice
4yeFs' court. alleging that driver on one
81 lke defendants cars malici0ualy ran into
~ plsintitrs team snd wagon while the
|ailsr was crossing the defendants track,
the wagon and hruising the
pam: ana u II further alleged, delaying
- plaintiffs work. Judgment Is asked IN
Is sam Of $40.
ctAfn s0R KssssszxcR.
An action Was commenced In Justice
kssrs. court hy Filing Void against the
kayshefn Pacific railroad, for the recovery
4 tst6sa. alleged 10 be due by the negli-
|Hses u the defendant In loslng plaintiffs
|espk Judgment il asked in the sum Of
|tHM