The Daily bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Hawaii]) 1882-1895, 1889-01-04
SUPREME COURT~-JAN. TERM.

kou for defendant.
Keawe, assault and battery. Kau-
lukou for defendant.
Waialeale and Ahaula, man
slaughter, I'd degree.
Kahaiola, larceny, 4th degree.
Kaulukou for defendant.
Grow, selling liquor. Kaulukou
for defendant.
FOREIGN JURY CRIMINAL CASES.
All Fook, possession of opium.
V. V. Ashford for defendant.
All Wa, possession of opium. Ka-
ulukou and Ashford for defendant.
Kennedy, opium in possession.
Magoon for defendant.
Hayselden, conspiracy.
Blackburn, fast driving. Neu-
mann for defendant.
Very, selling liquor. Monsarrat
for defendant.
All Tai, gaming. Kaulukou for
defendant.
Yock Ian, possession of opium.
Magoon for defendant.
Mcdonald, fast driving. Kaulu-
kou for defendant.
Lau Niu, violating liquor laws.
V. V. Ashford for defendant.
All Chez, possession of opium.
Houdlette, violating passport
laws. Neumann for defendant.
Bennett. larceny, Bird degree.
MINED JURY CIVIL CASES.
Minister Of Interior VS.. James
Keau, assumpsit. Attorney-Gene-
raj for plaintiff.
Kahananui VS.. Ashford, criminal
con. Rosa for plaintiff; Creighton
for defendant.
Kanakanui VS.. Leslie, assumpsit.
Smith and Achi for plaintiff.
Kekai VS.. YIN Quon, ejectment.
Achi for plaintiff; Kaulukou for de-
PENDANT.
Trustees Bishop estate VS.. Kala,
ejectment. Kane for defendant.
Joliva VS.. Kaulukou, assumpsit.
Whiting for plaintiff; Rosa for de-
PENDANT.
Bowler VS.. Ekalesia Kaumaka-
pill, contract. Creighton for plain
tiff; Castle for defendant.
Estate of Charles Brenig, probate
appeal. Brown for petitioner; V.
V. Ashford for appellants.
Aio VS.. Lindsey, assumpsit.
Brown for plaintiff.
Hardy VS.. Kihikihi, ejectment
| Castle for plaintiff.
| Colburn VS.. Gaylord, tort. Rosa
and Whiting for plaintiff.
Paico VS.. Monwar, ejectment
Rosa for plaintiff.
Clement VS.. Cartwright, assump
sit; Whiting and Rosa for plaintiff
Brown for defendant.
Kaahanui VS.. Kingsley, trespass
Kaulullou for plaintiff; Peterson fo
defendant.
Princeville Plantation Co. VS.
Mauliola, ejectment. Hartwell TO
plaintiff; Rosa for defendant.
HAWAIIAN JURY CIVIL CASES.
Kalauola VS.. Kekukahiko, eject
ment. Kane for plaintiff; Thomp
son and Kaulukou for defendant.
Kaloa alias Kamehaku VS.. Ma
limu, ejectment. Achi for plaintiff
Hitchcock & Hitchcock for defend
ant.
FOREIGN JURY CIVIL CASES.
Barry VS. McCully, assumpsit
Rosa for plaintiff; Peterson for de
PENDANT.
Crawford VS. Briggs, assumpsit
Macfarlane VS.. McCandless, as
sumpst. Ashford & Ashford for de
PENDANT.
Sherman VS. Harrison, assumpsit
Hartwell for plaintiff.
Peacock VS. d'Abreu, assumpsit
Whiting for plaintiff Ashford I
Ashford for defendant.
Parke VS. Peacock, trover. Brow
for plaintiff; Whiting for defent
ant.
McChesney VS. Cartwright, a.
sumpsit. Hartwell for plaintiff.
, All Hoy VS. Larsen, case. M;
coon for plaintiff; Attorney-Gener'
for defendant.
, Cornwell VS. Fernandez, trespas
J Neumann for plaintiff.
Bancroft Company VS. Grael
halgh, assumpsit. Ashford & Asl
: ford for plaintiff.
Mung Chun VS. Nolte, trespas
Castle for plaintiff; Brown for d
PENDANT.
8 Bowler VS. Hawaiian Government
assumpsit. Hartwell and Within
for plaintiff; Attorney-General fl
defendant.
~ ~ Wong Ko vs. Hawaiian Cover
: ment, assumpsit. Castle for plail
tiff; Attorney-General for defen,
ant.
zee Wo Chan VS. All Oak ct al, a
sumpsit. Neumann for plaintiff.
More VS. Hawaiian Government
e assumpsit. Neumann for plaintiff
i, Acknowledgement for defendant.
ct Bowler VS. Board of Immigratio
&c assumpsit Hartwell and Whitir
d for plaintiff.
s, BANCO.
! Martin VS. Kerr, exceptions fro