Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1889-05-14
SUPREME couRr-ArRIL TERM.

N BANK.
MONDAY, May IS, 1850.
The Court met pursuant to adjournment.
Present-Beatty &c. j. presiding; Thornton. j. ::
sharpstein, j.; Mcfarland. j.. Paterson, j.;
Works J. Spencer Clerk; Washburn Baiiiff
is2ii-Detourcey vs. wetmoreNM Motion to
dismiss appeal submitted.
I2,s45-Tremain vs. Barney; -, s93-Tremain
vs.. Barney: lS,o71-Wise ct al vs.. Williams es
al; L, 1885, Callahan VS.. Warder; H. l47-Hibbard
VS.. Howell; - 057-Eaton VS.. Richeri; u 400
Anderson VS.. California Steam Navigation Com
pany; y, 93l-Bryant vs.. Langford ct al; l. ,974
Carrie ct al. VS.. Lock ct al.-Ordered that
causes be continued for the term.
Armstrong VS.. Justice Court, etc.-Motion
By Holl for writ of prohibition submitted
13,lS3-JscSson ct al. VS. Torrence-On motion
OF Hart and suggestion of the diminution of
record, ordered that he be allowed to file a GER
titled copy of the notice of appeal with the
proof of service. Further ordered pursuant to
stipulation, respondent have thirty DAYS from
and after May IA. 1882 within which to Il e
brief; appellant twenty days TO reply; cause to
be thereupon submitted.
1S,175-Jackson ct al. vs. Torrence-Pursuantt to
stipulatlon, ordered that appellant have twenty
days from and after May a. 1882 within which
to file brief; respondent twenty days to reply;
appellant ten days to reply thereto; cause to be
thereupOn submitted.
13,164-Brusie VS.. Gates-On motion of Bond
ordered cause to be continued until June g. 1889,
at san Francisco; further ordered RESPONDENT
have ten days to file briet, appellant ten days to
reply thereto.
Admission of William 81. Cobb-On motion of
G. c. White, and presentation of license from
Supreme Court of the State of Iowa. and evil
dence OF good moral character, it is ordered
that William 81. Cobb he and he is hereby adj
mitted to practice as an attorney and counselor
in all the Courts of this State.
15,l53-Gibson vs. Board of S1pervisors-Ca
argued by Reid for respondent, and submitted.
lS,212-McCormack VS.. Silsby ct al: Is. 22O-
Morgan VS.. Bail; 13,l9l-Gardner vs. Stroever.
13,225-Rose vs. Bottyer-0rdered that these
causes be advanced and placed upon the pres
ent calendar; further ordered that in each cause
appellant have forty days to file brief, respond
ent forty days TO reply, appellant twenty days
to reply thereto; cause 10 be thereupon sub.
mitted.
1S,l54-Estate of Walkerly-Motion to advance
granted.
l2,94S-Bernanid vs. Beecher-On motion of
Elliott and suggestion OF the death of respond
ent herein, ordered that William Van Horn ct
al, successors in interest," be and they are
hereby substituted as respondents herein in
place and stead of said decedent; further or
dered appellant be allowed ten days to file brief,
respondent ten days TO reoly, appellant ten days
to reply thereto; cause to be thereupon sub
mitted
In the matter of the appointment of Court
COmmissioners-lt is this day ordered that Hon
+. 5. Belcher, Hon. Henry S. Foote Hon r. Y
Hayne, Hon. P. Van Clief and Hon James A.
Gibson be and they are hereby appointed Com
mlssloners OF TINS Cont, pursuant to the pro-
visions of an Act of the Legislature, entitled
" An Act to provide for the appointment by the
Supreme Court of five Commissioners, to he
known as Commissioners of the Supreme Court,
and to appoint Secretary therefor, to relieve
said Court from the overburdened condition of
its calendar, and 10 provide for the compensa-
ton OF said Commissioners and Secretary and
to appropriate money therefor, approved Febru.
airy Is 1889 1t is further ordered that D. B.
Woolf be and he is hereby appointed secretary
for such Commissioners.
Adjourned until 10 A. NJ. tomorrow.
DECISIONS FILED
Armstrong VS.. Justices Court etc.-Writ de-
MED; petitioners remedy is by appeal from
the order of the Superior Court of Butte county.
THE COURT.
II, 72S-Powel VS.. Sutro-Rehearing granted.
THE COURT.
l2,7l6-Swain vs. Stockton S. and l.. Society:
Il, 7U5-Estate of Acknowledging denied.
THE COURT.
modification denied THE CoIyRT-
13.2ll-DeCourcey VS.. Wetmore-Appeal dis
missed. THE CoTpT
I2,l27-Pennie VS.. Hildreth ct al-Motion to
extend time to file brief denied. THE COURT