Pittsburg dispatch. [volume] (Pittsburg [Pa.]) 1880-1923, 1889-01-08

the proposed new charter, City Solicitor
George Elphinstone yesterday telegraphed for
the decision. 1t was supposed that it was
mailed to him last evening, and he will proba-
bly, receive it to-day. George Shiras stated
last night that it was not at all likely tnat tne
decision would be announced before MONDAY
next
Other Allegheny county cases decided are
as follows:
Dilworth Porter Co. VS. Rummell's adminis-
traitor two cases). Reargunient ordered IN, eacn
case. ... Beatty VS. Beatty. Motion for reargumSns
refused Andrews appeal; c. ?. No. :, Of Alle-
gheny county. Decree affirmed. .;Canady, ioi @
Srned M H.. .GoidSitzer r VS. v Pennsylvania Railroad
Company; c. P. No. 2 Allegheny. Judgment af,
frmed... .Alston VS. Stewart: c. r; NO:
of Allegheny, Judgment affirmed. ;hiopier,s
sRRsA. cree affirmed. G ...fD fH re road il CHARTERS
proceedings below affirmed non certiorari..;;
Sellers VS. Van Uxen, Pierce 4 Co.; v +. No. NO; l.
Judgment affirmed. .Quinrey VS. Commonwealth,
o. s. of Allegheny county. Judgment affirmed.
=. County Of Allegheny Us Common wealth; G. 7.
No, Of Allegheny county, Judgment atiirmed. aeti
heatRgS appeal; O. S PassanSer SensR RaiIWsy
Company VS. Cox; e. p. Allegheny judgment
affirmed Urben VS. Pittsburg Times: c. MOL Of
Allegheny; Judgment affirmed the armour Armour
Ts 19e
affirmed. :. .Davidson's appeal; 0. .. Allegheny
county. Decree affirmed. %. Uhlinger VS. Kennedy;
Z. P. No. 1, Allegheny. Judgment afllrmed -.
Pittsburg Bridge Company VS. Brown A. Co: {.
and Canders ct al: G. r. Allegheny. Judgment
affirmed .Pittsburg Brass Company,s appeal;
c. P. Allegheny. Decree affirmed.
BBigserts appeal; e s. AeShsay cSmnIHy1 cOunty,
VS. Milthurv. Allp0heuy, Judgment af-
frmed... Veal vs. Nevin, C:P., Allegheny county.
Judgment affirmed. :. Grey vs. McFaiL Z. r, Al
legheny county. Writ quashed... ferguson VS.
Quinn; c. ?. No. Allegheny. Judgment re-
versed and venire facias de novo awarded. .Ap-
peal of the Pittsburg and Allegheny Droyeyard
Cpmpsy coppE OF
Ashworth, c. P. No. 2Allegheny. Judgment af-
frmed -. Bacon ct al VS. Horne, gsrnishee, e. 7.
No. 2, Allegheny. Judgment affirmed. Munday's
appeal, o: c. Allegheny. Decree afirmed..;
MRPesf and warren RI 0 assignee; e. P No Allegheny
county. Decree affirmed. Patterson ct al. VS..
Frasier ct al; Hazetine ct al. vs. same; Patter-
son VS.. same: G. z. No. Allegheny. The iudg-
monweslth; g Allegheny county judgment
ment mS fO3a e of Bellevue @ and
township Of Kilbuck VS.. Huddleston. ct al; p:
No. Allegheny. The judgment is reversed
as to the borough of West Bellevue and
%sd Ffa1ss Brohe9s to hf Sys &c. hsseny
county. judgment reversed. e. Hubbard ct al VS.
Pamer's administrator; G. 2. Allegheny. Judg-
ment affirmed. Crowley ct al VS. the Common
wealth, to use;C. P. No. Allegheny, Judgment
Allegheny. Judgment reversed and new trial
awarded -. Mcintyre VS. Mcintyre; c. P. No. .
Allegheny. Judgment reversed, and Judgment
Moorhead VS. Wolff. e. 2. No. ], Allegheny. Judg-
ment affirmed. -. .Bigham VS. Henrici ct al
rmsG e. Woi, ,anes eshen55 yudgTent gReeben1 1f
Decree reversed; record record remitted for further
proceedings. .Bingham's sappeal District Court
of Allegheny county. Decree affirmed =. Mar
land, by his next friend, VS. Pittsburg and Lake
county. W Judgment afirmed -. Henry Mariand vs. vs.
Pittsburg and Lake Erie Railroad Company. G.
p. No. ], Allegheny county. Judgment affirmed.
....Pantall 4 Davis VS. pickey. Y; I. No. ? Alle-
gheny.. Judgment reversed and the rule to strike
lutte. Dickson and wife vs. Hollister. c. P.
SPENCER SS et S9 e al UJe s Jennnss et al
G. P, Allegheny. Judgment reversed and
venire facias denovo awarded....ln re. e.-Vacation
of henry street, Allegheny City; Q. s. Allegheny
are affirmed ..McFalI ct al VS. McKeesport and
Youghiogheny Ice Company; c. p, No. e Allie
gheny. Judgment reversed, and venire facias De G
p, No. /. Allegheny; Judgment affirmed,
order Of the Court confirming the report of the
the record be remitted and distribu-
tion of McTighe Electric Light Company assets
made in accordance with this opinion. Brown
ment reversed and a venire facias de novo award
ed. -. County of Allegheny VS. McKeesport Dia-
reversed and judgment is now entered in the case
stated for $50 in favor of plaintiff and against de-
fendant.. In re vacation of portion Of public
road in Sterritt township, Q. $. Allegheny county.
The order of the Quarter Sessions setting aside
the report of the viewers is reversed. The excep-
tions filed to said report dismissed and the re-
port confirmed. The costs to be paid by the ex-
ceptants. :. Mellon VS. Davidson, No. c. P. Ae-
gheny. Judgment affirmed. .M0ntooth admin
istrator VS. Gamble, for use of Montgomery, c. p.
No. ], Allegheny. Judgment reversed =. Borough
of Millvale VS. Poxon ct ux., &. Z. No. ALLIE
gheny. Judgment reversed and procedendo
awarded.