Wichita eagle., 1889-05-19

Sarah C. Handy VS.. E. G. Cole; motion
overruled.
Ross A. Noble VS.. W. b. Norris; demur
| rer sustained.
E.R. Powell VS.. D. 81. Rhodes ct al.
motion to strike out irrelevant and sur
| pluous matter overruled.
| Henry Stattler ct al. vs. Ed S. Hubbard
| ct al; motion to take judgment on plead
| ing sustained.
| Louis E. Barry vs. Isaac R. Grishaw e.
| el; motion to dissolve attachment with
drawn
| ]. l. Mead VS.. Fred A. Peacock ct al.
motion for judgment by default with
| drawn.
H. w. Lewis ct al vs.. John A. Doran
motion to be allowed to amend bill of par
| ticulars sustained.
| Mary H. Chandless VS.. Claud J. Pintart
/ sustained.
Maggie Leggett vs. Josephine Duffy
| motiod sustained.
| George Stearnes VS.. Jerome Furley, de
| murrer sustained.
Sherwood & Sherwood VS.. John H. and
| Mary c. Baldwind, motion for judgment
on pleading overruled.
Frederick Stackman VS.. j. c. Byers, mo-
tion for leave TO file amended petition sus.
| tanned.
Isaac Salisbury vs.. Randolph ct al, mo-
ton for appointment of receiver sustained
In the assignment of Lee s. Viele; appli-
cation of receiver to sell property assigned
granted
John Catherwood VS.. Elvira Van Till
burgh; motion for leave to obtain service
by publication sustained.
Alexander Steele and Sons VS.. Calvin
Diehl ct al; dismissed and costs paid.
For the 22d inst there were set the fol-
lowing civil cases: William Little VS.. c..
S. Zimmerman; A. Wise & Co. VS.. Jocelyn
& Wingert; l.. j. Sturnes VS.. E. Sturnes ct
al; Bunnell & Moorehouse vs. d. E.
F'rantz; |. n. Lowe VS.. Hulda Wiley ct al
Isaac F. Miller VS.. w. Ward; Christian
Hook vs. n. B. Moore
For the 23d: H. L. Pierce VS.. Hardy
Solomon ct al; Otto Solomonski VS.. J. w.
Cooper ct al; O. O. Brown VS.. w. N. YES
tai ct al; Riley Wilson VS.. Hale Cowley.
For the oath: Wichita National bank
VS.. G. W. Green ct al; Mamie Mccall vs.
Jerome Turley; j. o. Davidson VS.. Kan
sas Midland Railroad company: Racheal
j. Wingard VS.. Betty Tay Anderson; Fan
ME J. Mueller vs.. n. Z. Osborn ct al; ;
Thos. H. Hills VS.. Thos. Fahey; Jerry Nc
Carty vs. G. w. Bartholomew.
For the 27th-Chas ngberry VS.. Jerry
McCarty; same VS.. 5. G. Butter; Carl Jen-
kins VS.. Z. Stetler; Davidson & Throck-
morton VS.. John Leibrand ct al.
For the 2Sth-Wichita Coal and Fuel
Co. VS.. ]. W. Baughman; Catharine l.
Adams. adm, VS.. G. E. McAdams; w. H.
Mercer ct al. VS.. Ida Houston Bodkin g.
Bell vs. Kansas Construction and Improy-
ement Co.
For the 29th-Citizens' Bank of Sedg-
wick VS.. n. II. Dewing ct al; Adam Kelly
vs. F. NJ. Barnes; w. II. Parsons VS.. L. d.
Tupper.
For the 31st-Robt. NJ. Jacks VS.. J. N
Campbell; the New England Trust Co. vs.
Henry Guyot ct al; w. A. Mourtz ct al. VS.
f. Schmidt.
COMMON PLEAS
The following cases were set for the GOTH
B. F. Yoh VS.. city of Wichita.
For the 2lst: John Deffenbaugh VS.. John
H. Herman, A. A. Post VS.. Mrs. j. II.
Reed, J. E. Oder vs. A. T. Miller.
For the 22d: Dora Laggart VS.. German
Fire Insurance company.
For the 23d: Charles Zinmeuger vs. Fritz
For the 24th: NJ. W. Priest, administ-a-
tor. VS.. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe; a.
L. Pien VS.. L. A. Johnson.
For the 9th: Robert McFadan VS.. Jones,
Tieman & Jones.