Wichita eagle., 1889-10-05
THE COURTS.
DISTRICT COURT.

DISTRICT COURT
Arthur Allen VS. E. j. Burnett ct al
Judgment in favor OF plaintiff vs. E. j
Burnett and E B. Remer.
State National bank vs Mary E. Weitze
and L. Weitzel; judgment in favor o.
plaintiff
Minnie Cowley VS. city of Wichita
injunction granted as prayed for.
Peter Bauer VS. John r. Moli; judgment
in favor of plaintiff.
L. Hays VS. A. w. Peck ct al; in favor o.
plaintiff.
State National bank vs. Belle OFT ct al
in favor Of plaintiff VS. Hannah Salinger.
Nettie Jerome, administrative VS. A. t.
Hellar ct al; judgment in favor of plain
tiff.
Ledger Cowley VS. c. S. Eichholtz ct al;
judgment in favor Of plaintiff VS. Elch-
hoItz.
B. Levi VS. c. W. Morris ct al; in favor
of plaintiff.
J. L. Doyle vs. Hannah Jewell; judg-
ment in favor Of plaintiff.
Charles Firebaugh VS. Thomas l.. Nc
Dermott ct al; in favor of plaintiff.
Fannie Stearns VS. Jonah K. Taylor;
Judgment in favor of plaintiff.
NJ. J. Oliver and Charles Z rebaugh VS.
B. F. Naylor ct al: in favor of plaintiffs.
George w. Walters VS. James r. Mar
shall ct al: in favor OF plaintig.
Henry Schweiter ct al VS. w. w. Clark
ct al; in favor of plaintiffs.
T. L. Fox ct al VS. w. j. Wilson ct al;
Judgment in favor of defendants.
A. G. BruggeInan VS.. q. W. DAZZLING;
Judgment in favor of plaintiff.
Henry Schweiter ct al. VS.. Wellington
Ransom ct al; judgment for pla if.
E. r. Powell vs. the Wichita & Valley
Center Railroad and Land company ct al:
In favor Of plaintiff.
Smedley Darlington VS.. G. NJ Greene ct
al; in favor of cross petition State Nation
al bank
John Il. Schoonover vs.. G. c. Strong,
appeal dismissed and case remanded to
justice court for execution.
j. W. Cooper VS.. John Sibel ct al; mo-
ton made by defendant Sibel to strike out
cross petition of defendant Smedley OAR
lington.
S. S. Gordon ct al VS.. A. j. Ballard ct
al motion made to dismiss action.
W. w SWEET VS.. J. NJ. Lewis ct al; in
favor of plaintiff VS. A. d. Wheeler.
Smedley Darlington vs. J. I. Wiley ct
al. in favor of plaintiff.
James Briody VS.. Wichita Mining and
Investment company; judgment for plain
tiff
E. D. Kimball VS.. A. w Riddle ct al; in
favor of plaintiff.
r. A. Dyer VS. Hiram Smith; dismissed
at cost of Plaintiff.
I 7 Ia ind Mt
In favor of plaintiff
John Tracy VS.. Nelson Chaffee; contin-
ued for term.
r. o. Deming VS.. Paul S. Melinger;
judgment in favor of plaintiff.
James j. Robertson VS. James II. Nc
Griff; in favor of painriff.
George Z. Strong VS. George w. Chaffee
ct al: continued for service.
James Cunningham, Son G. Co. VS. Dell
Hsines; judgment for plaintiff.
W. r. Tucker VS. Elzab tn Costly ct al;
judgment for plaintiff.
In the case of b. L. Furnish W. A. B.
Fisher a jury was called and empaneled.
Jacob Bissantz VS. Anna NJ. jackson ct
al; case set for Wednesday, October 0.
Charles H Austin vs. Ed Coleman; set
tied and dismissed at defendants cost.
The case of Lucas 81 Stewart VS. Gordon
81 Mcclure was on trial yesterday after
noon.
+. Stackman VS. G. w. Bartholomew;
dismissed at cost of plaintiff.
c. X. Miller VS. John b. Otto ct al; con-
tinued for service.
George +. Stewart VS. American District
Telegraph company; judgment for plain
tiff
Lizzie Ellis VS. Minnie Griggs ct al;
judgment in favor of plaintiff.
Lewis w. Force VS.. j. c. Mccoy; judg-
ment in favor of plaintiff.
Mutual Benefit Life Insurance company
VS.. Fred Stltzler, ct al; in favor of plain
tiff
H. c. Haskins vs.. Anna r. Twitly; con-
tinued and goes to heel of docket.
j. NJ. Bleakmore VS.. f. ". Bowman;
continued and goes to heel of docket.
A case was filed yesterday wherein Mary
Louisa Moser prays for a divorce from
Joseph Moser on the grounds of deserton
The defendant also wants back her maiden
name of Mary Louisa Haley
ATTORNEYS ATTENTION.
Attorneys are hereby notified that on
Monday. October IA, thirty cases will be
called and thirty cases will be called on
each succeeding day up to and including
Saturday, October 81
PROBATE COURT
Inventory and appraisement Of estate of
James Donaghe WAS filled yesterday.
Papers were yesterday taken out in
which it is shown that George Wend-
linger and wife adopt a female child from
the Wichita Childrens Home