Santa Fe daily New Mexican. [volume] (Santa Fe, N.M.) 1885-1897, 1889-06-06
ATTENTION, TAX PAYERS.


AIInNIIoN' Ian fAIhN3'
1t WIFI be remembered that on N"Vel'-
Der s. 'NHH lion l. b. NAlroh' " large
TAX payer OF santa re eoHA'y' Drought Il
OH III equity before . "dSe Reeves tIio"
presiding lHdS" oI inns "'"'Fi' charging
/ lilat subsequent 10 tiie Hct OF congress .!
July 49, lSS6' hlnIt!nE the amount Oh IN
ueotedhes" "hlrh can he contracted j.?
any county IN any territory, the county
"oiIlI''iSSio'lt17 OF >"h'" IT '"'''iE ISSUED
warrants "i'eh the "e''l"' Indebtedness
Oh the county exceeded iA' IIh''' pre-
scrIoed by congress- dating Sori' warrants
SO 'iat lleE would appear 10 nave '"''il
issue" h''ore inc passage "i H0''' ''t'
lhere are other allegations i'll iIl' pli,
puI l"r Tue purpose '' ''''7 "'"'' ''Ic
above Is Su'Il'ieh'. '"'i' PHu''''l III H'N
Din aNk'" iial 'i'o county commissioners
DE restrained from IcVlliIT" lux I"f inc
purpose "' paying lheHG "aIFa'''9' l"e
county 'i"I''"Std u'lr' attorneys "''"
demurrer [" me hIi 'H"!7c reeves 9uS-
IaIheu liie demurrer ann H''IIiLel" grant
I'LL lhJuh'II"" restraining sio county com
hlISSIohefH !i"Hi t@N\IhE taxes :" pay
"'eSc WARRANTS III H'"'N''''''N' 'I'' '''He
WAS Appeared t' ''' i'rl''o.hu supreme
court li'"' court ''''>'' 'ir tie. Ioi.h
ol Jud-' Reeves "fd hriu ti'A' III IiIl'i'''-
l''h Sho"'' nave Deem 'o'''e' a. prayed
lof'
we cop! rom 'i'' Opinions ''' ''II
charges '''at the boar" "I county roni'''la-
Sioh'FS ny "i'" u'fon-H (i"Ir chairman
ISSUED ana SOFA IilF county "A'F"h'S'
Win interest coupons AI'Eh'" alter Tie
ACT OF congress OF July ~, 1880, iia1 been
PhSScu' an" ante uale'i lI'e!ll SO lila' tl'eI
SHOULD "PPe"r 10 nave neeh ISSUE upon
'''c ISL ''"S o' 'U'H' '''"' "ii" Il"t Ill lIle
tIlhe VI 'i'e "ct""I ISSUE III? COUNT III
0"i'" re WIS I'ue''U'' !" It" '''''"""'
eN'eeuliiE ) per cent III Lie '"I"c Vi inc
'"Ano'e Property VI ''e county tiiI7' II |
w. ''1'' II - ''''lli''e' "S '''o ''eI'lu''e'
was " ''o"' e''''''i VI VIC N'l VI congress
anu n""N upon l''o law ri""' Is
'e'oSll'"c" ~ one VI ''e s'ouhu7 upon
Which, 'oui' VI c'l"''! VIII l''V'lleIc 10
pieNe'i' L" "'o'S' '''''o''si' 'l'cre may de- I
sum- IeB"I 1e'''e'l prov i''eo' i"c pill
luf'i'ei Vi'"iseS ti'"' 'i'e oo"ru VI
county commissioners '''rc"teil ana give
o"' 'ii"' ''''l VIII '99"e anu leso'i"'c '''e
reni"i"ihE F-o'ooo vi 'l'''c WARRANTS II
"' VIC 'i'''e Vi 'i'e ''iSt ISSUE VI warrants
anu III '''c ''nie TIE pl'I was 'Ileo' lle
county was lhoeoted IN an amount equal
Ut exceeding 'lle llill'V 'IAeo III 'le act Oh
congress- ana II the poafd OF commission
efs WAS ABOUT 10 exceed the Il'nII iiSed IN
Vie act Vi congress- all" Il tue BOARD Oh
COMMISSIONERS WIS ABOUT 10 cre"le |
lurll'ef Indebtedness ny 'lle Issue ana safe
VI 'lie Iclllaliihs ""IIa'''S' "uIhofl|e" ny
Tie reSolulion Vi July w. looo' Iheii cieari!
'ucli contemplated action would ne inegal
ana lf"ud upon complainant Us resi-
1eil' TAX payer Oh tue county, ana lie could
by injunction prevent us Accomplishment
before S'lcil action WAS lieIu ana tle war
rants issued tnefe would DC no adequate
eeal remedy open 10 iillh' Inc judgment
must De reversed anu the case relnahaed'
IL LOOKS therefore, rs Il lhe warrants
10 above are " ifaV" anu they'll
since july 3D. looo' We are lhiof'neo'
great many ""fr"hVS' also illegal anu not
ior necessary current eAPeises' nave oeeii
iss'ie'i' me y We" NihAl'AN ~ Iiliorii'e,'