The pioneer express. [volume] (Pembina, Dakota [N.D.]) 1883-1928, 1889-04-12
THE VERDICT
OF the Court in Cases rot Previous.
ly Reported.
CRIMINAL. CASES,

CRIMINAL. CASES:
Territory OF Dakota VS.. John McMillan-W !
kncesliaw. j Pratt. Quashcd,
Territory OF Dakota VS.. Alexander McGillis-W
D kneesliaw. ......."... Quashed.
Territory of Dakotavs. Franklin Jackson-w J
hnceshaw. ......."...... No bill.
Territory Of Dakota vs.. Thomas Colvin-W j
knceshaw. d. W. Yorkey. No bill.
Territory of Dakota vs.. John Thaycr and Colin
McLeOd-W Knecslaw. NC Young & John L
Stack. No bill.
Territory OF Dakota W. Fan Rodge.s-w ]
knccslisw. ......"..... No bill.
Territory Of Dakota VI. Bernard Reimes and
severt llanson-WJ kneeshaw. ......... No bill
Territory of Dakota VS.. VIM and Geo Montgom
ery-W knccslaw. W GafIncy. Indictmen,
found, selling liquor. Defendants left the coun
try.
Territory of Dakota VS.. Lars skaro-W ] Knee
shaw. ............. Indicted for selling liquor,
plead guilty. Sentenced 10 twenty days in count,
Jail.
Territory of Dakota VIZ Vim and Geo Montgom
ery-Kneeshaw; Gaffney. Indicted for selling
liquor. Parties left the country.
Territory of Dak vs Angus Gillls-Kneeslaw
Muir. Indicted for larceny. The circ umstanccs
fthis case were reported last week. The fury
brought in the verdict guilty and he was scntenc
ed to two years and six months at bismarck
Territory of Dnk vs. Clas Scverson-Kneeshaw;
................ No indictment.
Territory of Dak VIZ Thos IL Young-Knccshaw
................. No Indictment.
Territory of Oak VS. Geo Mckee-kneesliuw
Plead guilty TO grand larceny Sen.
tence to six months at Bismarck. This 10 the
man who broke into Mr. Kcllcrs butcher shop
and stole some meat.
Territory of Oak VIZ John Lithgow and Frank
Gullofong-kneeshuw: .............. Plead guilty
to grand larceny. These are the boys that stole
Mr.. McFadden's team of Batllgate and who were
chased to the Missouri river before being caught
They are comparatively young and have already
been in jail eleven months. Under these circum
stances the judge released them under their own
recognlzancc, but informed them that he could
and would call them up and sentence them il
they misbehaved lii the future.
Territory of Dakota VI Robert Gildings. Plead
guilty ofselling liquor. Sentenced to fifteen days
in JUL.
Territory q Oak VS. Geo Shambaug--Knets shaw
................ No bill.
Territory Of Dakota VIZ. John Peppard-W J
Kneeshaw. TW tiuilney. In this case the &c.
crsed WINS indicted for selling liquor at Drayton
without license. lie plead not guilty, and on his
trial before the jury only one witness appeared
and he swore that lie bought and paid for glass
of white rum from Mr.. Peppard. No other testi.
mony was Offered and yet the jury had consider.
O1,l II py,1t
ten to two for acxuit.al They finally brough,
in verdict guilty. On Tuesday the names Of
Mr.. reppard's bondsmcn, Messrs VIM Moorhead
and IL kabcrnas.e were called by the sheriff
three times in the court with great solemnity, and
they were bid to produce the body Of John Pep
pard or forfeit their bond. But. as Mr. Peppard
was ut that time about three miles north of the
cour, house, under the protection of the queen
there was no response, The bond, $500. was
then declared forfeited, and tile judge proceeded
to sentence Pcppard to be- confined in the county
jailsixty days and to pay $500 tine--wlen caught
Territory Of Dakota VS. james Pearson, indicted
for selling liquor without license; plead guilt,
and sentenced to thirty days i'll the county jail
CIVIL cAsEs.
Frank A Wilson VS.. Cias Bauer-W Knee
y & Givens VIZ. John McI.eoG-lI Hughes. {
II Mcgquier. Settled.
Mccormick Harvester Co. w, James Shannon
W Gaiiney. G II Megquicr. Continued.
Gudhjorg Johanncsson VI. Stylus Olafsson-W
knccslaw. "....""... Appeal, dismissed
Il Glow VS.. John Eastman-TW Gailney. {
II Megquier. Judgment for defendant.
Martin Ackrann vs. Michael Langan-t II Meg
quier. Hughes & VIM. Judgment for plain
tiff.
Archibald Mcmillan vs. Tw Gaifncy-AcMil
Ian Muir. q II Mcgquier and Stack. Con
tinued,
CAultman & Co VS.. John L Thacker, ct. al
W A Cobb. IL Mcgqu:er. On Calendar b.
error.
| CAultman Il Co. 81. .Alvah We,,ster-W
kneeshaw. Geo II Megquier. Continued.
C.Aultman & Co. VI. John A Beathune-W. !
kneeshaw. TW GatIney. Continued.
HR Vaughn, N EjNclson, W S Thompson an
W Kneeshaw VS.. Hamilton Township-w
Kneesllaw. Geo. II. Mcgquier. Court instructe
jury to bring verdict for plaintiffs, $50 and cost
II Thorscn vs.. David Dick-Noycs & McLaugl
lin. II Ross. Continued.
CAultman & 20. VIZ. James McCabc-WJ Kne
shaw. John ID stack. Settled.
Celestine Thomas VS.. Scribner and Kaber nagl
G II Mcgquicr. W. Knecshuw Continued
await receivers final report
Alexander Airtli VS.. W. J. $. Trail --G II Me-
quier. W Kneeslaw. Settled.
Almira a II Slider VIZ. Thomas lIunt-Spaul
Ing Il Templeton. G II Mcgquier. Continued
Judge Tcmplcton had been Slader's attorney
the case.
Plano Mfg. Co. VS.. Ernest Grierson-w Kne
shaw. TW Gaflhcy. Continued.
d NJ Osborne n Co. VS.. Cfas. Howatt-Isaac
Hall. ............ Withdrawn, costs 10 plainti
Mcdonald Il Smith VS.. + 4 Wardwell ct. al,
Burke Corbet. WI Knecshaw. Dismissed, co,
oplaintiff.
E Taylor VIZ. John Observation-Disclosures
Vim. G II MegIu;cr. Verdict for plainti
sl67,
J. b. stcfiiin VS.. VIM james, d Stack. T
Gatincy. Continued.
II Mayo Creamery Co. w. David Dick-W
= Knec.haw. Ball, Wallin & Smith. Dismisse
, costs to plaintiff.
Almiral A II Siader VI. David McCar,hia
spaulding Templeton. II Mcgquier. CO
tinued as Judge Tcmpleion had been attorney
!, the case.
4 PETERSON & Davidson VS.. Vim James-WJ Kne
shaw. I W Galney. Dismissed by plaintiff.
! Frank Morris VS.. James Jollnson-'r " Gaffne
!. ........... settled.
n IL Thomas VI. ] II Bird, administrator CT ,
), tate of A.C Nichols, deccased-Clcland a. Sa
ter. W j Kneeshaw. Continued.
u Alonzo Henderson vs. + NJ Burke-Spencer
q Ransom; Hughes dismissed.
Fred " Kelliugfon y, pn,nl, lin, N{,;,,,x ,,,, n
Co-Megquier; Kneeslaw. Dismissed on mott
9 Of defendant.
8 Nick Kintzale VS. Nick Karels-Gaiiney; Con,
}. s. Megquier. Judgment for costs for defendant
j W Hare VIZ NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS., You,