The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1889-03-18
The Court Record.
COURT.

SUFEklOR COORI.
Room lion. Napoleon B. Taylor, Judge.
Milton Pouder VS.. Charles Singstock.
Cause dismissed and costs paid.
Mary Smith VS.. Jas. A Smith; divorce.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
George Wallace VS.. Bette Wallace; di-
vorce. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
Room 3-Hon. Lewis G. Walker. Judge.
George Bruuson VS.. VIM. HI. Roberts; to
set aside Judgment. Finding for plaintiff;
and judgment against the defendant for
costs.
NeU Suits Filed.
Annie Vice vs. John Vice; complaint for
divorce. Allegation, cruel treatment:
August Galloway vs. Nicholas HOffbauer,
ct al; suit on delivery bond. Demand. $500.
CIRCUIT COURT.
Hon. Livingston Rowland Judge.
Claims against estates dismissed for want
of prosecution: Travellers Insurance Com
pany VS.. Jehu Miner Indiana Ex-
change VS.. Aaron McCray; joseph
A. M;,I Moore w VS. William p obn ThuFstoa:
Charles R. Hasely VS.. Mary Murray; Will
lam II. johnson VS.. James G. Marshall;
l.. l.. Todd VS.. Abraham Levy: Cathcart,
Cleland & Co. VS.. James +. Heller; An
thony K. Miller VS.. Charlotte Brinkmeyer;
James Hamlin ct al. VS. Francis Kelley;
Anna +. Myers ct al. vs. George w. Astor;
William Il. BurfOrd VS.. Johnathan w. Cor
don; Nancy Reno VS.. Mary +. Glazler; Susan
W. Sullivan VS.. Elizabeth Atkinson; Their
Bracken VS.. Addie Bracken; John T. POore
VS.. James Pruitt; VIM. F. Wadsworth VS..
Cornelius Wadsworth; Hasselman Journal
Company VS.. Jonathan w. Gordon; Ripley
IL Hedges VS.. l.. Rosenberg; Henry Jamison
Brown; NJ, \; Secrist VS.. c. G. Bobbs;
Jemima DeStrong VS.. c. C. Bobbs;
c. II. Kruger VS.. Charles w. BirlIit; Elan
ner d Buchanan VS.. Aaron McCray; Elan
ret Kelly VS.. Sophia Brown; Crown Hill
Cemetery Company VS.. Mary F. Glazier;
John L. Strong VS.. David Newlin; Robert
III. Bigger vs. III. b. Putnam; Daniel Feely
VS.. l.. b. Gardner; Jaaua 4 Co. VS.. L. b.
ner; Globe Manufacturing Company VS.. l..
Il. Gardner; Samuel Records VS.. Leonidas
nj. Brunson; Frank Griffiths VS.. Aaron Nc
Cray; George Hasty VS.. Elizabeth ID. john
son; i. c Strauss vs.. "; A; GS&pseSys;
Henderson VS.. James Wilcox; Flanner g.
Buchanan vs. Peter s. BENEFIT: +. William
Schaefer VS.. Valentine Schneider; Samuel
Records VS.. VIM. Hensley; John L. Avery
nell; Mrs. j. X. Davis VS.. Elizabeth ID.
Johnson: Julius Kiefer vs. David NJ. Adams;
Archibald c. Rice VS.. David Allen; w. ID.
CulbertsOn vs. Valentine Schneider; f..
Poster Il Cows. John X. Parlnalee; w. H.
Kindleberger VS.. John X. Parmelee; s. n.
Moore VS.. Semelia A. Wilson; Isabella
Sewers VS.. Semelia A. Wilson; Chas, f.
Meyer x Bro. VS.. August j. Frevert; Christy
d Christy VS.. August j. Frevert; Klein
Bros. N Hyman VS.. August j. Frevert.
Claims allowed were: l.. II. Everts 81
Co. VS.. Jonathan w. Gordon, S90. 93: Noble
Warrum VS. John G. Atkinson, S2.179.O7;
Enos b. Reed VS.. Michael Shields S15; Rem
Than, Long & Hedges vs. Robert Smith.
Sl2s; John Newton Cloyer VS. John Dury.
S472.95; ). w. Herrick & Co. VS.. John bury,
$500; Morrow Shoe Manufacturing Com
pany VS.. John Dury. S133.5O; Hathaway,
Soule N Harrington vs.. John Dury, Sis;
Emery IL Holmes VS.. John Dury, S13l. 90:
Lampin IL Foster VS.. John Dury, S2l2.2l;
Hatch Flexible Shoe Company VS.. John
Dury, S4I.65 III. III. Jennings VS.. John Dury,
$685..
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS.
No. 1852. Mary G. Baker VS.. Lillian
Ludlam. Clinton. {. c. Affirmed. Mitch
ell, IA bill to review a Judgment for er-
TOR apparent on the record Is in the nature
of an appeal, and such bill can only be
predicated upon such error or errors as
court. In this case the wife of the defend
ant in foreclosure suit employed four at
torneys who set up an answer of suretyship
under the statute, but three of the attOr-
neys withdrew by leave of court. and upon
the assumption that the appearance and
answer of defendant were withdrawn de-
faulted the defendant. Held. as no excep-
ton or objection appear, that no question is
presented.
1920. I. IL. & r. r. Company VS..
George w. 5tockwell Putnam, &. T.. AZ
firmed. Berkshire, IA party was in
jurcd by being run against by locomotive.