Wichita eagle., 1889-05-04
ghe qahita lau eagle Saturday oruug, ass 4, 1899.
rHE couRrs
COMMON PLEAS.


COMMON PLEAS.
Brown vs. Allen and Brown vs. Allen
were disposed of in this court by 3udg-
ment for the plaintiff. Attorneys STAN
ley, Wall and Dale were appointed COM
mission to examine court stenograpner
Mr. Fazel
POLICE COURT.
l.. j. Clark plain drunk SO alleged,
was arrested yesterday morning and tried
in the afternoon The prisoner pleaded
not guilty, but the evidence in the mind OF
the court convicted him to the amount OF
s. so and then committed him. He had
$40 in possession of the court but be SAID
he would rather stay in jail for while.
No other arrests were reported.
DISTRICT COURT.
INN. J. Hall VS.. j. D. Hall a divorce
was granted as prayed for.
In julius Winklemeyer VS.. James Fa-
hey Judgment was rendered tor pialntlu
for &, 5s4 with per cent.
In James Tufts VS. Stanley ct al, ]uog-
ment was redered for the plaintiff in the
sum of $780,
In Johnston VS.. Hovey q motion to have
case set for trial as to S. ID. jackson, de-
PENDANT was sustained and Judgment rem
dered against jackson for ST6a and
costs.
In Colburn VS.. Stoner ct al. judgment
was rendered for plaintiff in the sum OF
$500.
In Timmermeyer VS.. Evans ct al, judg-
ment for the plaintiff for ST.
Hendricks VS.. j. r. Sniyely ct al. was
dismissed and costs paid.
A. W. Snyder VS.. E. D. Rankin; appeal
Davidson s. Throckmorton vs.. John Lie
brand ct al; continued.
o. r. Miller VS.. VIM. Qninwell; con-
tinued.
James W. Tufts VS.. J. c. Richey; judy
ment for plaintiff for 500 and q per cent
interest from date.
". J. HolIingsworth VS.. A. +. Kennedy
ct al; appeal dismissed.
John f. Limerick s. Co. VS.. 4. N. Demp-
sey; continued.
W a. Mount VS.. F. Schmidt; contin-
ued.
peal dismissed.
ii. C. Fisher VS. j. F. Ensley ct al; APP
peal dismissed.
james Fahey VS.. j. E. Parker at al; ap-
neal dismissed
John a. Windsor VS.. Henry Stunkle;
RosaWest VS.. J. R. Gould; appeal dis
missed.
ued. ,,,u.
change of venue.
continued.
tinued by consent.
John Arp VS.. A Gaskell; settled.
a NJ. Bryson vs.. R. C. Willis ct al; judy
ment for defendant for costs
ID. J. Chatfield VS.. c. s. Newman et al
Judgment for plaintiff for Si4o Win inter
est at IL per cent from date.
Daisy Musgrove VS.. Kansas Steam Laun-
dry: appellant dismissed. =,
Rutfer & Fisher VS.. Howard NJ. Davis;
Judgment for plaintiff for Ss44 at per cent
from date
Alex Steel & Son VS.. c. L. Morgan; ap-
pellant dismissed.
iudoment for plaintiff for s66. 50, at per
cent interest from date sud costs.
.Ioseph Whallen vs.. Morris .. Roberts;
appeal dismissed
John Tracey VS.. NJ. f. Newcomer ap-
peal dismissed.
r. Z. SAKE VS.. Wichita Ornamental s.
! Pressed Brick Co: a peal dismissed.
II Stackrnan VS.. G. w. Bartholomew;
! apneal dismissed as Per stipulation.
Is i. O'Brien VS.. n. c. Hadley; judgment
for plaintiff for $50 IS at per cent Interest
! from date.
". F. Norman VS.. S. o. Teri; appeal
dismissed
Merkle Plow Co. VS.. l. r. Gilbert; ap-
Chase e. Sanburn vs. Gandolfo & Co,
iudgment for plaintiff for sll4.l5, and
per cent from date.
P. Heron vs. Z. Longnecker, appeal dis
missed.
W r Little VS.. \. f. Halmstead, appeal
dismissed.
David Kohn vs. Albert o. Solomon,
Judgment for plaintiff for SlS5.1o, and II
per cent interest from date
J. ii. Tilden VS. ". Il Mercer, appeal
l. r Ketchum VS.. G. w. Jennings, ap
pe Sitizens Bank VS.. George ". Street, sp-
| peal dismissed.
Edward Wigglesworth VS.. George Wells
appeal dismissed
| Samuel Stell VS.. j. l.. Randall; nppeal
Ed McGrannon VS.. Thomas Dillon
| Judgment for plaintiff for Sll6.oo, at pei
cent from date
appeal dismissed.
"p GAVIN D. West VS. H. B. Andersen; ap-
| peal dismissed
Saloman c. Curtis VS.. Ii. b. Anderson
appeal dismissed.
L. c. FAUCET VS. Aaron Watkins ct al
appeal dismissed.
Joseph Struloach VS.. L. ID. L. Iash' ap
&c, N. Chanes VS.. Kellogg & Son; appel
liant dismissed
s /. Davidson Mortgage company VS.
J. G. Simpson ct al; appellant dismissed
f. Goldburg g. Co. VS.. James Moore, ap
pelfant dismissed.
Steel g. Walker vs.. Geo. j. Hess, appei
liant dismissed.
liant dismissed.
badger Lumber company vs. Lsaec G
Wooten ct al; dismissed at cost OF plant
ifs. r
Badger Lumber company VS. Isaac
Woo,eu ct al: dismissed at cost OF plant
ifs.
Wichita Banking Co. vs. E Hutching
ct al: appellant dismissed -
, Elizabeth s. Burton vs.. Nelson
George: settled and costs paid.
7 F Eager rs. o. w. Wood ct al; appea
dismissed.
Robert Brown vs. Alfred c. Keller
: judgment for plaintiff for sILA and pc
cent interest from date
Bailey & Sons VS. Wichita News Co; az
peal dismissed
c. II. Devore & Co. vs.. Emma McCiur
: ct al: Judgment for plaintiff for eiIs 70 an
u per cent interest from date.
: Geo. L. Jaquins VS.. John A. Wilson; ar
peal dismissed.
uofr,,T <, Rhinrherd vs g Herman