The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1889-11-14

the light of reason, is thrown into everlasting
darkness and classed incurable. Nothing pul
praise can be given 10 the medical stan ana AZ
| teudants who surrendered their comfortable
quarters and moved into the cellars OF the
building where all the offices, visiting rooms and
sleeping quarters of attendants are now located,
to make more room for the poor wards OF the
| territory.
| kept and clean as ever.
I'VE find that the county court Of Utah
county, in violation OF section OF an act en-
titled IAN act TO establish uniform system OF
county governments" approved March $, 1885,
did on the 9Th day Of June, 1883, authorize the
! loan OF a sum OF 500. by the said Utah county
/ 10 the Provo Canon Road company.
I'VE have examined the accounts OF the col
| lcctor of taxes for Utah county, for the years
1855, 1886, and 1887, and lind deficiency OF
IS, O51.9s, as shown by the annexed statement,
| A. o. Smoot, Jr in account with Territorial
Taxes and School Fund.
I'VE have devoted tWenty-seVen days 10
United States business.
/ WILLIAM 81. FAIRBANKS,
Foreman OF the Grand Jury.
civilian l.. DYKES,
Clerk of the Grand Jury.
DATED at Provo, this 18th day OF November,
1889"
Joseph Collingston, one of the detectives re
Gently arrested for perjury, was put upon trial
The Jury was sifted pretty thoroughly and tive
were excused before the panel was full.
Attorneys for defendant admitted that he ties
titled substantially as alleged and that there was
an issue joined, and that the evidence was ma
| terial.
Mr.. r. s. Hines testifed-My business is q
druggist; l have saloon at the back; was
there Sunday the 9th OF October; l know the
defendant; this is the second time saw them; !
| don't know whether he was in my saloon on that
day. was there most Of the day and till lO:3O al
night; don't know whether was i'll the saloon
at all; l was in the drug store most OF the time
| they are connected by q hall; have no distinct
recollection at what time left that day, but
always leave at o'clock. The main entrance 70
the saloon is from the street.
Charles Dorius-I live at Provo. am par
tender in the employ Of Hines. l knew defend
ant. Saw him in the Justices court on the 9TH
inst. 1t is not true that sold drink or beer
or whisky to defendant on the 2Itn. was at
home, sick: had the sick headache and cholera
morbus Nv wife was there with me all day.
! She was not out OF my room more than ten min
utes at q time. She'waS in a part OF the mousse
in another room. know Plerrepont; ne USED
10 live near me. "A friend, Carter came TO see
me during the day. lady friend was with him.
Myself and aboy tend the bar most OF the time
Mr.. Hines tends bar some OF the time. we
three are the only ones authorized to tend bar.
John Homer-f live here in Provo. am bar
! tender for Mr. Hines. was at Hines drug store
October g. Dorius was not there at all that day.
/ didn't see either OF them that day. nave
worked for Mr.. Hines for several months.
know was there that day because was there
all day. / don't recollect all that happened four
Sundays ago. Don't know whether Dorius was
sick that day or not. On the 18th was IN the
saloon and Hines was in the drug store / didn't
follow the policemen up the street that day.
Didn't see them at ALL On Sunday l never let
anybody have anything TO drink. have never
seen Collingston before. l don't remember all
the men that come in.
The prosecution rested and the judge in
structed the jury TO return averdct OF not guilty
Mr. Sutherland said his client would prefer 10
go upon the stand.
His honor remarked that he didn't care what
defendant wanted, no case had been made out,
and the jury returned verdict accordingly.
The case of Jacob Smith, partner Of the former
defendant was then called for trial. The same
jury, by consent, returned a similar verdict
without hearing the evidence.
Peter Madsen, bishop of Lake View, this
county was tried for unlawful cohabitation.
After all the evidence for the prosecution was
in, Mr. Thurman, for the defense, moved for a
verdict of not guilty, which was granted and the
defendant was discharged.
At the opening of court in the afternoon, the
committee lately appointed to examine L. A.
Wilson as TO his qualifications for admission to
the bar Of this court wished to complete their
examination in open court Mr.. Wilson was
thereupon called to the witness box and put
through q series of questions briefly. Mr..
Evans, in behalf Of the committee, said that
they had examined the applicant very thoroughly
yesterday, and now moYed his admission. He
was then sworn in.