New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1889-03-13
nrT OF LEGAL NEWS.

An attachment against Meter q Co. Rfaated BY
Justice rAwfsnss ef the Supreme Court yesterday
so suit or Lsuis Mandsi claim fR 81 eo advanced %
the Arm. The eefenasaks sse non-rssldentG
provsicnsi. bono OF "a 500 been given by James
A. Hall tie assignee Of the Ohio and Western ccsl and
Iron Company, NO schedules have yes bean aled-
An assignment without pteereaees made yesterday
20 James T. Hoils by Sarah Case and Frank a Adams
donr business A. tae "ew-York Hardwood Lumber Com
pauy at Eleyenthave. and xourteerth-st
James A. Clark and Henty W. Clark. composing the
em Of clask Co.. merchant taiiers Nc LIS Bfcsawss.
made an assignments yesterday to walter p Lsng giving
preferences Tor sst - commercial paper held by ths
Bank OF Ne Metropolia ~ fN9 St.E
Alexander Warner obtained verdict yesterday in the
Supreme caurt for e2i $40 against the Uaitea stases
Land and investment Company, ~ the amount due on
bonds Of the company payment Of which had been re
fused asesson that the bonds had been stolen
IL was shown that the plaintiff an tnnoesht holder
Of the securities and The verdict in his favor was d.
reeted By Justice Beach t%
Fanny sslignan says that E Esmuels hes brCken his
centrsct 70 marry her, and she sued him in 1857 for
5000 damages. lie answered that his promise was
made condionaiy, end that she had broken her part
Of the agreement by failing 70 give HIM eAoVO She
has married another man since the suit begun and
has failed 10 prosecute It On this ground Justice Law
renee in Che Supreme Court Chambers was asked yeste
DAY 70 dsass the complaint He reserved his decision
The latest suit begun by Alexander Stewart Of Yer
mont sgsrs Henry Hilton. &c recover share OF the
estate Of Alexander r. Stewart ended yesterday y
consent Of both parties 70 the htisaton The suit was
begun The United States Circuit Court two or three
years ago. ana dismissed beeause the plaintiff
dia not give sscsSiy for casts similar suit begun
several years ago by the plaintiff settled by THE
payment Of eonsidesabis OF money BY Mr. Hilton.
release then given which set up ~ defence
In the latest suit The present settled without
aud tho suit was begun b. his guardian. Bsnjshnn
y. wheiden.
Decisions Ell THE COURT or APPEALS.
Albany, March f2-m the Court Of Appeals to-day
she fcliowiss desisIoua wsfs handed down;
John Jacob Aston et al. respondents agt the Areads
Raiiwsys appellant; N. p Bailey ct al aet The same
Andrew T. Huyck, administrator, respondent sgt
Thomas N, Andrews appellant Indignant Affirmed via
Hugh Lewesy ct AL executors, sppeilsn.s ast sarsi
Erskine respondent gudgmens anlrmed and Judgment
absolute ordered In fsyef Of the defendant with costs
cut Of the estate.
In Re the probate cf the last win It Henry p Fys
man, deceased Judgment Of the General Term anl
Lecree OF tho Surrogate reversed and proceedings ~
rritted for farther sotah 70 the Surrogate win tn
question OF costs reserved Tor the dissemination Of TN
Court below epeu ne final disposition Of the
Marcus 81. Beeman, respondent agt. George A. Bania
appellant Motion to dismiss appesl. Ordered tina
me defendsss Hfhin tvsfy DAYS Of ssfvios 81 c6pl
Of tsis order ae new undertaking to tho same eiee
Is the original and serve copy thereof required wild
respeet % rcs original UNDERTAKING and u hs fsiis
d within the above stated tins. then the appeal thf
s ket,on Is kareby dfszE@ed
AIfscd wslsoa texesntor act suthsfisna Tssny,, q
<fruee ETC. Motion dismiss appeal granted with cosi'
Hensy BeclcN GO al, appellants agt che Kew.Yod
rfoatne Fy noek compsny, resBonesnt Actien for n
Argument dsn,sd. with costs.
Adam Exsetieh. appellant, sst Peter Hensrhsn g o.
,.spopdentk yaasasas reversed nader sestion 14sS
the CODE and new Niai ercercd
Hobart 81 Atkiason fsoelvvF, &C., respon1Anf sk
ths Roshsstex Printing Company. appelane Metioa
irsnsfer nom The second eiyisnn Notion denied vie
sas 800 po,ssmus sssShsSEk at ne Fischbur