Arizona weekly journal-miner., 1888-05-30
District Court Calendar. June Term.
 1898.

District Court calendar..J Juno Form,
 1898.
 U. $. CRIMINAL
 The U. s. vs William G Cadien: U s Attorney or plaintiff. Defendant iu : custody.
 The U $ vs John L Cambridge; U s
 attorney for plaintiff Defendant on
 bail.
 The U vs Oscar Lincoln; U $ s.tor.
 ney for plaintiff. Defendant on bail
 The U vs Oscar Lincoln; U s attor-
 ney for plaintiff. Defendant on bail.
 The U $ vs Warren E Day;U s attor.
 ney for plaintiff. Defendant on bail.
 The U $ vs Warren E Day; US at.
 torney for plaintiff Defendant on bail.
 The U vs Genett Gordon; U s at torney for plaintiff. Defendant at large.
 [. $. CIVIL CASES.
 1 No 30. The U $ vs John H Marion tt als; U attorney for plaintiff; R ush, Wells x Howard.
 No g. The U vs G w Hance, l. s Knowles and Wm Schrader: U s atto, ney for plaintiff; Rush, Wells < How
 ard for defendants.
 No 24 The U $ vs G w Hance Arnold Huggle and John Hance; U attorney for plaintiff; Rush, Wells & Howard for defendants.
 No 34. A & P R K Co vsA NJ B R Co; w c Hazledine for plaintiff; T G Norris for defendant
 TERRITORIAL CRIMINAL CASES.
 Territory of Arizona vs Owen King; District attorney for plaintiff; defend ant on bail; E M Sanford for defendant. 1 Territory of Arizona vs Jerome T ] Ford and Patrick Ford; District attor. new for plaintiff defendants on bail. ] Territory of Arizona vs Jas Tewks- | bury, Ed Tewksbury, Joseph Boyer, Jas | Roberts, Geo Newton, Jacob Lauffer and Geo Wagner; district attorney tor plaintiff defendants on bail. Territory of Arizona vs Thomas Ora. ham. Louis Parker, Miguel Apodaca, Thomas Darlington, William Bonner, Joseph EllenwOod and William Gould district attorney for plaintiff; defendants Grsham, Apodaca and FL lenwOod on bail-Other defendants at large.
 Territory of Arizona vs Louis Parker, Thomss Graham, Miguel Apodaca, Thomas Darlington, William Bonner, Joseph Ellenwood and William Gould district attorney for plaintiff; defend | ants Graham, ApOdaca, and EllenwOOd on bail, other defendants at large.
 TERRITORIAL CIVIL CASES.
 No lO62. c w Lail vs James w Col l gan Rush & Wells for defendant.
 No 1345. Territory of Arizona ex rel ]! Mary Stemmer vs w Spatford; for plaintiff NJ Sanford; defendants w H McGrew, Wilson < Norris.
 No 1865. W Sullivan vs George Puntenney; Herndon < Hawkins for plaintiff; E NJ Sanford ar. John How ard for defendants.
 No 1869 Jane Dandridge vs Charles Dandridge; H c BOurke and Sumner Howard for plaintiff.
 No 140S. Philip Hahn, plaintiff and vs F. s Wilcox defendant and appellant; en appeal from justice court; T G Norris for plaintiff; H J Miller for defendant.
 No Al. Jake Marks vs St Louis Yavapai Mill X Mining Co; Rush, Wells < Howard for plaintiff; Herndon ( & Hawkins for defendant. No l4l5. N Peterson ct al vs l. Wol- lenberg; Rush, Wells & Howard for plaintiff; E NJ Sanford for defendant. No 142O. NC Sheckels vs Richard son and Seamans; E NJ Sanford for HerndOn < Hawkins for de- endant. No l42 John Chart, plaintiff and appellant, vs Jeff D Shipp, defendant and respondent. On appeal from jus ices court; HerndOn X Hawkins for t Rush, Wells < Howard for T defendant. t No 1446. T J Simmes vs Campbell i; I Baker; H Edwards for plaintiff; 1 :. Rush, Wells X Howard for defendants. No 1450. Aztec Land & Cattle Co vs F Daggs ct sl Rush, Wells < Howard |" md T S Bunch for plaintiff; w L Van fl Horn for defendant. 1, No 1452. Jacob Ebinger vs Arizona T Cattle Company; H Miller for plain iff; Wilson X Norris for defendants. No 1456. w A Deputy vs George Q Lount; John Howard for plaintiff; W n 1 McGrew for defendant.
 No 147O. w il Landing, plaintiff and espondent vs F. $ Wilcox, defendant nd appellant; on appeal from justices . ourt; H J Miller for plaintiff; Norris Ross for defendant.
 No 472. Territory of Arizona ex rel h 'riggs Goodrich, attorney general, vs 'scar Lincoln; Attorney General for h Harris Baldwin and Wilson 1 Norris for defendant.
 No l473. Territory Of Arizona ex rel riggs Goodrich, attorney general, vs L Hatch; Attorney General for plain di if; E Edwards for defendant.
 No 1474. Territory of Arizona ex rel h, riggs Goodrich, attorney general, for laintiff; F. J Edwards for defendant. No l47S. Andrew S. Gonzales vs of mma Gonzales; w l. Van Horn for laintiff; - for defendant. U No l479. Emma Gonzalez vs An h, rev Ganzales; il J Miller for plaintiff; Y L Van Horn for defendant.
 No 14S7. Goldman & Co vs Odell ct '" L; E M Sanioid for plaintiff; Harris ca aldwin for defendant.
 No 149I Referred. Esser vs Esser; si ohn Howard for plaintiff. cl No l4JO. JOnn Cidrk VS A VI ID ID n | T. o ct al; Herndon & Hawkins for '' aintiff; Wilson G Norris for defend It. to No 1902. James Loy, plaintiff and ps spondent, vs w E Lockwood, defend 1t and appellant, on appeal from pro 1 ,te court; E N Sanford for plaintiff, G Norris and HerndOn & Hawkins ,,, T defendant. No 1504. T Rumsey, administrator, gb A M B R R Co; E M Sanford for to aintiff, Wilson & Norris for defend stl It. m No 150G. Kennedy X Holtzmau r., NJ BR R Co; Herndon < Hawkins " r plaintiff, NJ Sanford for defend a' 1t. co No 1513. H Mosgrove vs Peter pl rannen; E NJ Sanford for plaintiff, cr 'ilson & Norris for defendant. No 15l4. $ A Maxwell < Go vs Jas ,y; order entered substituting and 'u scharging, on conditions, etc; H tn iller for plaintiff, H J Miller for de DO ndant. tn No l5l5 Thurber Whyland & Go vs f.. mes Loy; same order as in last case .- ,ove; W l. Van Horn for plaintiff, H !' . IT |