New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1888-05-14
DEMOCRATS CRTTICIsE GOV HILL
THEY DO Nor LIKE HIs HIuH-LloNNsn

THEY DO NOT LIKE his hiuh-bAS'-'''
r. ELLrRY ANDERSON SPEAKS rLAlNLr'
uow eor,ors,r covcrnor Uilrs veto Of the High
License bill will Affect his party In thls STATE !"
difficult question 10 decide at present. Dut II Tao
Democrat. OF the rest of the State are az deefy III
censed at the Governors action as are many VI ~.
representative members of the party IN thi' '''',
certainly will be painfully felt by the democracy IA
November, especially ~ Hill is esndfoate So'Hs
that he has done since he succeeded MI Cio'eiAnn
as Governor has stirred the Respectable e'cne'" u
his party intensely.
is only natural that leading mon OF me party, "ho
are loyal TO its principles should feel great
about expressing themselves publicly On INC su0'"
Nevertheless, there some seen si'or NV W"
message was published who ala NOV ho'" .
clare their convictions the matter Dut AsAo- :"
have their names withheld. Ono gentleman, now
ever did mot imnose this restriction. This was r.
EIlery Anderson ono Of the leading members ei 'ns
County Democracy and strong supporter u 'A0
Administrations tariff policy. .
~Yes, am disappointed at the High License Vsso'
he said IN response TO an inquiry 1u "oF 49,
Governor Hill would sign the bill nsAru 'he
measure as n conservative ana nece''", ,n a.,
ought to become lav signed the peu"on "a, 10
behalf 7 do not entertain any prohibition notions
about the liquor trrnlc but do know thst Is !"
sponsble for more vice crime and wrotchodhco' "a ~
anything else. 1t ought TO be Requested Joe non
It is. This bill proposed 10 do SO ana tut 'H"N -,
It should have been signed by the ooNoru'r
! have read the reasons that Mr Hill sF'' 1'i 10
approving the bill. but do not think 'n'y o '"'"
Gent by any means TO Justify him In his eourSe,
What will be- the effect of this veto ana also 'he
action Of your party in opposing the hisHl'''H''
measured
Well, l don't think II will have so great an erect
as you Republicans expect. 1t might II Mr. mn ~eie
in the neld but do not believe be VIII % esnaiuso
The sentiment against him Is too strong anu ~uiio ~
has not Jet crystaIiIcd In favor Of any o'nor sns'
candidate think there Is no doubt that 1t VIII pro
vent Mr. hnr-s denomination .,A A., A,A.u
Othor Democratic leaders agreed WI 81, thInr
sons views, except that they were nonru ~ 1 mn
that the veto would affect the party g. In ,hIs
SAID one OF the best known DcmocrApS 70 hiu 49,.
CITY IL vas great mistake TO lBevuu Hin fssa.s
year told secretary Pine. OF lh. =. Pm sse,Id
committee, so. IL almost certain ma A ,sr,st
oppose Il, and things have come out Jus, ~
u has put our party in bOi-, and paa yne. we.
the effect OF II win be Is hard TO say Dus aS. car.
10 discuss II or the Governors message ION az
imagine my feeling however, from ~ns hsvs ssa
Chairman Albert Grfln. Of tho ssfionai AMI
saloon Republican Committee ssa hss Ike uensr
mems votes any way said Mr Griffin Ino{ nsa no
place 20 so except 20 him. His veto Viii ony man
them love him little more, but Il VIII erve aw va,
many temperance Democrats who have sScd s'n
their party becsu,e thcy thoushs it ws - "oen NJ