The McCook tribune. (McCook, Neb.) 1886-1936, 1888-12-21


Al The December term OF the District Court
for this County. teld in .ndiunola last week. the
vmriou. cases were, disposed nf rs foiiows:
First Mari Bank Of lndianola W. {. e ilodg
Kin. dismissed costs taxed TO plaintiff.
G :. Quick W.. & r. Hodghin, Dismissed.
COSTS taxed Ia pIHiUiif.
Exchange NatI Bank vs Vim n Hayden CT
A.. trial set for 1hursdHy. Dec. ". 1883. by
nprper eni-
NJ. orinick Harvesting Web Co VS. Fraucis
Man ian. motion FOR security for costs; motion
sustained
Walsh & Boyd vs.. Barney Hofer. continued
by ny
il & Wells u ~. va. lanes F. and Alfred l..
Clark under Hdvisemebt.
Frank A. Moore VS.. Darius Kendall ct al deed
set aside. sale ordered.
Joseph Merritt vs. Linder & Erman, dismiss
wichacl j. Dooley VS. C p. Rinker, dismissed.
VIM. Haisey vs.. Frank Pennington. dismiss
ed
Geo Clark rs Geo. W Stodiari, Judgment
Tor plaintiff
Jns. Hanning Va. C. P. tinker ct al. 80 days
Ia Plead
Howard Lnmhrr Co. vs. J. NJ. Huet, dismissed
81 PLAINTIFF cost
Frees a. HocknelI Lumber Co VS. Allen 3 trt-
ley ct al under Hdvisement.
Frees 4 Horknell Lumber Co. VS.. allen Bart
ie! ct nj. under Amusement.
Anna Launhran vs. Edward Sweeney ct al.
under Amusement
u. H. Kay Va. john II Yarger. Judgment for
z. H. Kay ,s jain F Collins. Judgment for
plaintiff Sl.Gl3 q. per cent. interest tnd costs.
Joliei En'erprise o w: Is Phillips ct ux.
81 nI.. decree for p~laipIiT, SI.0J6 81, . per cent
interest and costs.
W G.. laTourette SEQ vs.. John F. Collins. de
cree f ~ piaiatitf. s722 10 per cent interest aud
COSTS
Austin. Tomlinson s. Webster Manufacture
jig Co. W. j. w Muiken ct al. default taken.
G; B.& Q Il. vs.. q. Price ct al, 81 DAYS
~ plead.
John Farrell VS.. I. e. Banthain. dismissed
cost at plaintiff
L. F Bib.ock VS.. |. j. Starbuck. default l. J.
Stmri,uck taken.
Eastern HankingC Co. We. Elias Il Ellen Canaga,
under nd yisemeIt.
Biish. Mize & Silliman VS.. ]. :. Phillips ct TX.
ct al.. decree for p,aint'f, S23l.S6, III per cent.
interest and COSTS.
Lucy Horkey VS.. john Horkey. dismissed.
W. B. Spain VS.. Jacob NJ. Short, dismissed
Al plaintiffs c0st.
Iitiletnn Naiionml Bank va. Frank Fritch
aud NJ. II. Clifford. lower court affirmed. costs
taxed TO plaintiff.
Wseth Hardware g. Manufacturing Co vs;
ID J. Richman ct uX.. decree for plaintiff
81 l3I IS. IL per cent. and costs.
}. X ShauD VS.. A. Hartman ct TX dismiss
ed III piuinilHs cost
Ella Yaser Us. Martin wager, dismissed at
The People ex rel AGoddard VS.. e Boyer ct
al. injunction nude perpetual.
Sch,oi District No. 26 vs.. Mrs. e. L. Nettle-
ton ct nj dismissed at plaintiffs cost.
a. &c ddard ct al. vs. Boyer y Gillen, passed.
Mar, G.. Alley VS.. Clark q Bartlett, security
for 90 sis required
). L smnh VS. NJ. Ellen Spaulding ct al, 80
dH! s /" plead.
ii. f lark vs.. J. S. Phillips ct al plaintiff
allowed ~ dHA 8 IN plead.
Iowa ta,b Steel Wire Go. We. J. S. Phillips ct
nX decree for plaintiff. $500, 8 per cent. and
costs.
j. ;. Phillips VS.. C. Il. Smith ct TX. defend
ant allowed Z days tn fse atiidavIts
VIM Murphy VS.. W.O. Russell ct al 30 days
10 Answer
PrrcIlla Pryor vs. WIN. Shackler, 30 days to
plead.
Frees and fIocknell Lumber Co. US. Allen
Ear ley ct al. decree for plaintiff, $42l 81. 10
per cent. and cost.
VIM. d.. Ely vs.. Allen Bartley ct al. decree
for p,aintiT. 81 III iS. 10 per ce 1t an | costs.
&. L.. Watkins I'll al. VS. Marder, Luce Il Co.,
dismissed at plaintiff S cost.
.innu i5akervs Is Ii DuckwOrth ct al, dis
missed. costs taxed 10 plaintiff
VI. 4. smith 4 Co. vs. Allen Hartley ct A.. de-
cree for ~plaint,tf. Sl.2H Is. IL per cent aud
cssis
f. L.. Brown Va. Allen BARLEY ct al. decree
for plaintiff. SS4 u. iU per cent. and costs.
rees & iiockneil Lumber Go. IS. j. 5. Le-
i!cw a. al. defendant leave to answer.
Frees s. HockneIl Lumber Go VIZ. q l.. Kay,
decree for plaintiff, sl,Ts5 "a. Z Ter cent. and
f. l. Brown VS. Lyman e. Hanning ct ux
decree for plaintiff, s6s "a. 10 per cent. and
COSTS.
or plaintiff. 1914 II, 10 per cent. and costs
Red Willow county W j. Is Doipn TT al, dis
.sS.d ut plaintiffs cost.
NJ. f Smith s. -. VIZ II II. Hines ct al de
cree tor plaintiff. 1856 Al 10 per cent. and COSTS.
Mary r. Owens rs. W. Clark ct al decree
for plaintiff. 1884 SO. 10 per cent. and costs.
:. StraSser vs.. ii. ". Black ct al decree for
plaintiff, $i22 81. IL per cent. and costs.
"a z. tau vs. a. Barley ct al. decree for
plaintiff. SIG 81. 10 per e. nj. and costs.
Ii. :. Hisi,np ei al, vs. f. Boyer ct al, dis
missed. Costs .axrd TO plaintiff.
Met ord. Brady g. Co vs. Dina STEINER ct al.
deere for plaintiff. $l2s.2S. IL per cent. and
GO SITS.
State Bank of Cambridge vs Dina STEINER ct
al, decree for plaintiff, S9S 81. IL per cent. and
costs
Citiz"ns Bank of McConk We. d Reynolds ct
Tx decree for plaintiff. $3os.75. IL per cent
and costs.
! e Seelny vs. Geo. W. Coffin ct al. dismiss
ed AZ plaintiffs costs.
Chas Nash vs. II. NJ. Wolf eft al. decree for
plaintiff. $53S II. 10 per cent. and costs.
JENNIE Bush Us. Mary Il. Orine ct al, defend |
ant allowed 81 da, TO plead.
j Byron .lrIIuiiips VS.. &. A. Frederick ct TX, |
d sinissed AZ plaintiff 8 cost.
for p'aintiff 81 76 ~. 10 per csnt. ,nd costs.
}. B cunningham vs. W. w. Dunham ct ux..
confessed Judgment. 1887.
G.. q. Johnson vs \. n. Cowles ct ux, de-
PENDANTS default taken. |
j ". Dawes OF al. VS.. l.. SOnmprs, no order |
". Barnes vs.. E. j. Arlington ct al, ~ daj s
to plead
WIN. Gaiser Us. r. II. Thomas, garnishee dis
charged.
STATE of Nebraska vs. Clyde Allen, bonds to |
keep the peace for 6t days.
state OF Nebraska VS.. AL. A. Prehm. dis
In sSed.
State of Nebr ska IS. Joseph U. Lashley. re-