The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1888-03-27
SUPREME COURT.
calendar for the -Apr1I Term, Begin.
ming Monday, April I'D.

for plaintiff, Kinney tor defendant.
Keamalu VS. Luhau, ejectment. Hatch
for plaintiff, Kinney for defendant.
Kino Kalo VS.. Keawe, damage Hart
we'll for plaintiff, Poepoe for defendant.
Kuanalewa VS.. Kipi, ejectment. Brown
for plaintiff, Kinney for defendant.
MIXED JURY
Kealoha VS. All Tim, eiectment. Achi
for plaintiff, Poepoe for defendant.
Kaleialii VS.. Kekuawela, ejectment.
A. G. Smith and Kinney tor plaintiff,
Thompson for defendant.
Castle VS.. KauIuk OH, replevin. Hatch
for plaintiff, Ashford & Ashford for de-
PENDANT.
Kanaloa VS.. Quinn, ejectment Thomp-
son for plaintiff
Kanaloa VS.. Union Mill Co., eject
ment Achi for plaintiff.
Apona VS.. Kamai, assumpsit. V. V.
Ashsord for plaintiff, Castle for defend
ant.
Kanakanui VS.. Leslie, assumpsit.
Achi for plaintiff.
Tregloan VS.. Aholo, assumpsit Ash
ford & Ashford for plaintiff.
FOREIGN JURY
The King VS.. Louisa Dorde, vagradcy.
Attorney General for the Crown.
The King vs.: Mannheim and Murdoch,
fas riding. Attorney General for the
Crown.
The King VS.. Lang Hang, gambling.
Attorney General for the Crown, Castle
for defendant.
The King VS.. Tai Quong and All Hung,
gambling Attorney General for the
Crown, Rosa for defendant.
The King vs.. Mike Coffee, larceny 4th
degree. Attorney General for the Crown.
The King VS.. Summers, larceny At
torney General for the Crown.
The King VS.. Lee Fook, perjury I'd de-
gree. Attorney General and Hartwell
for the Crown, V. V. Ashford for de-
| PENDANT.
McChesney VS.. Wong Chun Kee, as
sumpsit. Ashford & Ashford for plant
iff, Neumann for defendant.
Hop Sing Co. VS.. Kun On, assumpsit.
Ashford & Ashforp for plaintiff.
Gay VS.. VIM. McCandless, assumpsit.
Hartwell for plaintiff, Ashford & Ash
ford & Ashford for defendant.
Parke VS.. Chin Hop, assumpsit. Ka-
neakua for plaintiff.
Martin VS.. Kerr, assumpsit. Ashford
& Ashford for plaintiff, A. C. Smith for
| defendant
Richard VS. Overend, ejectment. Kin
ney for plaintiff, Brown for defendant.
Sam Shing VS.. All Hung, debt. Hatch
for plaintiff.
Minister of Interior VS.. Bishop ct al.
eiectment. Hartwell for plaintiff.
Martin vs. Kerr, trespass. Ashford &
Ashford for plaintiff.
Thomas VS.. McInerny, assumpsit.
Brown for plaintiff, Hartwell and Whit
ing for defendant.
Collector of Customs VS.. G. w. Mac
farlane & Co., assumpsit Attorney Gen
eral for plaintiff.
Collector of Customs VS.. 81. R. Mac
farlane, assumpsit. Attorney General
for plaintiff.
Castle VS. Leong Kit, assumpsit.
Castle for plaintiff.
Congdon vs. Alderman, trespass. Ash
ford & Ashford for plaintiff.
Collector of Customs VS.. Luce, assump-
sit. Attorney General for plaintiff,
Hartwell, Hatch and Whiting for de-
PENDANT.
Wolfe & CO. VS.. Ables, case. Magoon
for plaintiffs.
Bishop & Co. VS.. Willfong, assumpsit.
Brown for plaintiffs, Hartwell for de-
PENDANT.
BANCo CASES.
Perrett VS. Kaa, appellant. Excep-
tons from October term. Kinney for
plaintiff, Castle for appellant.
Widemann VS.. Ahin, appellant. Elk
ceptions from July term. Monsarrat for
plaintiff, Castle for appellant.
Lunalilo Trustees, appellants, VS..
Waihee Sugar Co. Exceptions from
January term. Hartwell for appellants,
Hatch for defendants.
Kahai VS.. Rose, appellants. Excep-
tons from January term. Achl tor
plaintiff, Kinney for appellant.
Bishop & Co., appellants, VS.. Pacific
Navigati Exceptions from Janu-
airy term Hatch for appellants, Hart
well for defendants.
The King VS.. Makuaole. Appeal from
Hilo Police Court.
Black VS.. Castle & Cooke, submission.
A. c. Smith for plaintiff, A. Rosa for de-
PENDANTS.
I'm Wo. Sang Co., appellants, vs. Alo.
Equity appeal from Preston, j. Hart
, I'LL for cnnallants Neumann for de-