The Hawaiian gazette., 1888-05-01

--as.a Ssa4S-lsa--..4N
. II r0o5uaad 4 S1sst deal hsG been
+ sid and written a lsie years On p1o-
hib5lou 1D6 otS-pTchih5tioU- Re did
+ l0s pretend 10 know WhAs the p-lvste
+ opinions q The 5urO-S On thsSs qUeS-
. ronS might be. hut il they ha6 shy
. pTsjElScSS SEzirsI tbs defendant owing
"a his being 5 liquor dealer. they
E ought 40 iivsS- their minds a them.
While Tts hlEhsS1 And oeSs officials IN
I tins land 81 down 70 bSnous.S whe-e
. the vine flows fTsSly, IL would uOi Dc
. % hunt down fhe lieUo- dealer and Lex
Z ne ~ q. Ehe community 20 ScOt fTe-a.
rs vs. SC-Ty thS1 o-e q Ehe headers
IN tbs Temperance movement, his
friend NJ. Clishm2n Jones vSS not
F On the 5u-y thzE he might tSIS with
him Il wcll5 aa props= 30 conrine
SE-1-.2o- u l1lt charges presented Itle
C-sle- zU1 er@Su0sS q L wETe then
rs.5-Ee6 u BIZ Ehs Srezssr- he oe-
LlsvS-1 IL The spirit q k5-o--1. b,g- =
ya> 1o1 right 70 regard persons 81
criminals vgi1c did what ths >-St-lls
zE1 cEs Government SLOWED them "a
90 Counsel La-a 15ie--gsi To CSsp-Sil
AaylSv> Soel1l standing n This com
---El-v- IL Eaylsv Mss - CSa1 s r-SC
= -LE E-C>5clrEC,l v-c.,.G represent
him az L. II h. vs. S E-S5 clSs> scamp
ID uSS cutie reasonable 70 SCC0lSe him
ezrs hls- Il .isesiVIuE N-. Is1eS- CSuu-
- t1sl r-oo5e3si u EeclIe the ul2lu
-s.e-> q rt.s evidence Inc Only mouth
IEa- C1-l1 give : cO-1ecs SccCunt O this
CAS- outside a N-. Luce. VS. thai q
NJ. Cz-zva-rO. Desencs wanted him
- : Wines Inc prosecution 7su7s-
>eutsi themselves GssS.roCS u obtain
Ing klS testimony. hut no SuoplanS
hzS been Issued fC- him e come for
wSr1 Cz.StiorS from Wharton On
evidence were here resi by counsel On
E -he S-b5ee- q. SlnllSslcaS- Referring
70 ths interview II ths Office Q. ths
Z Mi1iS-G q interior. II sid h might
( E2ve nl2le mistakes n that inter
view. tu1 he VS. nos yet In the
I-S-e Asylum: Sll tie lsvys-S there
present might hSye INSIDE mistakes
uCT they could nOs have been such
fools - q induce their client u make
& confessions q C-lminsi sc.s- 91d thus
give himself SwSy 70 Officers q IEe
( Government Counsel continued MS
review Q. the evidence. - show the
ShSsEcs q criminal Sc-lC- O. IL
Tent On TIE ra-E q defendant II q
person MS confidence enough IN s.
mSr u give him 5 blank check.
signed. Il : reasonable u assume Ill--
MS confidence EUeS Isl enough % trglSs
him WLz- 70 puE IN It. WHIST would
SUyu-e a u similar Cl1clE1S 1S-lczS :
There Evzs No evidence inst HSy-ey
liG Ms tell EE5 truth. but told > lie
when y tod defendant tlz- M Cans
vzErc Gzi ssli 70 nj VI Ihe order with
lilU1-S or Vyhicb the lemitE@G duties
would It $50 He @>ked the Jury 10
keep LLSc paint before them when con
S5Gsrl-E their verdict TIE sEzentiou
q the fury SIS alS1 directed 70 the
Shszt = o.Eer sui SimiiS- orders
submitted 70 then On TueSlSy- sitter
noon.
The Ceu-c took recess f0r one hour
on EEe RESEMBLING q the Court
III. Hs--weI continued MS S6drsSS-
az6 proceeded 10 discuss the mzg-e- 0:
fzlss p-e-ezs5S. One ESs cannot con-
nit Conspiracy. EzcA one o rhs
counts in -Ee Indictment mus be
proved 70 make good tie charge q
Co-Spirzcy IL as esSs 1EiSl 70 : con
Ele-5O1 u I'M tbSr HSyley He'd znc
tLzt defendant knew rtlzE he lied shout
the crie-. C01nSel referred % the
-.
his LawSuir with Nj Euee II
which. - IL sisted n his evidence h
Eu- -Ezxel- The AttCELey--i 5eDsEzl
rs only $ h-uz1 being and il takes
vs-T S-rC1E c1zrzcIe- not % ts In
Eusnas1 lE personal feelings towards
81 ouzE-s--- AE-s- defining E1e Pc
v5s5drS u L--e reve1tzs -zTs- 3Ir Eart-
vel closed his slLTeS> 81 ~ 5-l-y min
-ts> Tss- C-E
A---E.2E EEK EsAE I'd Tx JURY
Trs A--c-zey-CC--5zzrzl sdireSszl tie
7rT o. teLz-E y TIE Gown h
z-reei With E-ueE u Ul1z1 hzl been
zlrz-cz.l o. counsel E1E the 1szeE1z1-E-
For his uE &c rGEr- reasonably be T1S
lzS-ESe-l O. Ezez = graf Cszl q SyulUG-
--T E-- -Es 6ese-1zur n s criminal
z-zzl When S-u5yir- fur his prizes
son. II Ez1 UzEie kind q resolve
zlEzys 70 zppezr Oh the USrr q IIe
psrs1n sce1sei E5 had N Sniuus
Snd ID pre5G1iee Si-S5ESt defendant
He vas only Ii the discharge O Ms
I duty II euisSTuziDE % bring ont The
whole truth znd 81 t1e facts in this
ezss- Any prosecuting Officer VIA
could eEls-EaE1 3 personal hiss 2g2izs5
defendant VS. unit f0E MS Office.
/. ESS 3 Fs-y SUzLl sui. that TTU1l1
stErlb-t= u smother mzI s sgseep-
ti5ilisy @ ps-s1lsl 5n6JzenGs Il : czss
@ this kind. = the learned co1Dsez- Fl
GeEe7Gzzt hz1 cole- In his references
70 politics co1nsel S6uitts-i Jhzt EEez;
scandals had existed IN The Custom
HcEss especially n connection With
Withdrawals q liauGrs Itwzsz great
sandal azd gra1t i1ieEiTy stfaafilg
ever nan II EEe country u the Gov
eminent / d=frzu6e1. every uzn Who
u1ys taxes L 5sfFsu6a1. Counsel al
--5rEa3 rEzE LEe system rs dishonest
aE1 s-zrial0GS. and n admitted thz-
EzS client EzS concerned II Il The
Legislature represents ths people. the
Ministers zre The SeET5E-S q ths Leg
5sLzture- and $ : Minister, he Ss5
c1rryi1z G-E- N this prosecution, tie
instructors G ti1e Ls=EiSEsture HeEcz
the abslrdiIy q counsel charging the
Arto-1sz-Cre1s-sI With uzTSOlsl AMI
nus And although the verdict q tie
Furv you'd x c0nrirt5o1. ne would
Ak tie Cont a0t 10 pass s=lIsDce G.
Imprisonment On Mr. LE1e. While
gulf azi corruption a1d EusEenues
a. -E-z f.s-r-z--- n s--e- m r-Fr1Tl-