The Hawaiian gazette., 1888-04-03
APRIL TERM
Supreme Court of the Hawaiian
Islands.
morning

+ FOLLOWING l. the Oaleuuar OF the A pTIl
Term, beginning Monday, April ,,
1SSS. Mr.. Justice Dole, presiding.
Hon. c. W. Ashford, Attorney-Gen-
eral:
HAWAIIAN JURY.
0kuu vs.. Kaiaikawaha, replevin
Rosa for plaintiff; Kinney for defen-
dant.
Keamalu vs.. Luhau, eieetment.
Hatch for plaintiff; Kinney for de
PENDANT.
Kino KaIo W. Keawe, damage.
Hartwell for plaintiff POepoe for de-
PENDANT.
Kuanalewa vs.. Kipi, ejectment.
Brown for plaintiff; Kinney for de-
PENDANT
MINED JURY.
Kealoha V. All Tim, ejectment.
Achi for plaintiff; POepoe for defen-
dant.
Kaleialii vs.. Hekuawela, ejectment.
A. c. Smith and Kinney for plaintiff (;
Thompson Tor defendant.
Castle vs.. Kaulukou, replevin.
Hatch for plaintiff; Ashford & Ash
ford for defendant.
Kanaloa vs.. Quinn, eiectment.
Thompson for plaintiff.
Kanaloa vs.. Union Mill Co., eject
ment. Aehi for plaintiff.
Apona vs.. Kamai, assumpsit. Y.
Ashford for plaintiff; Castle for de
PENDANT.
Kanakanui vs.. Leslie, assumpsit.
Aehi for plaintiff.
TreglOan vs.. Aholo, assumpsit. Ash
ford & Ashford for plaintiff.
FOREIGN JURY.
The King vs.. Louisa Dorde, va
graney. Attorney General for the
Crown.
The King vs.. Mannheim and Muir
doeh, fast riding. AttOrney-General
for the Crown.
The King V. Lang Hang, gambling.
Attorney-General for the Crown; Cas-
tie for defendant.
The King V. Tai Quong and All
Hung, gambling. Acknowledgement
for the Crown; Rosa for defendant.
The King vs.. Mike Coffee, larceny
fourth degree. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT for
the Crown.
The King v. Summers, larceny.
Attorney General for the Crown.
The King vs.. Lee Fook, perjury,
second degree. Attorney-General and
HaTtweu for the Crown Y. Y. Ash
ford for defendant.
McChesney vs.. Wong Chun Kee, as
Sumpsit. Ashford 4 Ashford for plain
tiff: Neumann for defendant.
Hop Sing Co. ". Kun On, assump-
sit. Ashford & Ashford for plaintiff.
Gay vs.. Vim. McCandless, assump-
sit. Hartweu for plaintiff; Ashford
& Ashford for defendant.
Parke vs.. Chin Hop, assumpsit.
Kaneakua for plaintiff.
Martin v. Kerr, assumpsit. Ash
ford & Ashford for PLAINTIFF 4. c.
Smith for defendant.
Richard V. Overend, ejectment.
Kinney for plaintiff; Brown for de-
fandant
Sam Shing vs.. All Hung, debt.
Hatch for plaintiff.
Minister of Interior V. Bishop ct al,
ejectment. Hartwell for plaintiff.
Martin vs. Kerr, trespass. Ashford
* Ashford for plaintiff.
Thomas v. McInerny, assumpsit.
Brown for plaintiff; Hartwell and
Whiting for defendant.
Collector of Customs ". G. W. Mae
fsrlane & Co., assumpsit. Attorney
General for plaintiff.
Collector Of Customs V. H. R. Mac
farlane, assumpsit. Acknowledgement
for plaintiff.
Castle V. Leong Kit, assumpsit.
Castle for plaintiff.
Congdon V. Alderman, trespass.
Ashford & Ashford for plaintiff.
Collector OF Customs vs.. Luce. as
sumpsit. Acknowledgement for plain
tiff; HartweIl, Hatch and Whiting for
defendant.
Wolfe & Co. vs.. Ables, case. Ma
coon for plaintiffs.
Bishop & Co. vs. Wilfong, assump-
sit. Brown for plaintiffs Hartwell
for defendant.
BANCe CASES.
Perrett vs. Kaa, appellant. Excep-
tons from October term. Kinney for
plaintiff; Castle for appellant.
Widemann y. Ahin, appellant.
Exceptions from July term. AIonsar-
rat for plaintiff: Castle for appellant.
LunaIilo Trustees, appellants, rs.
Waihee Sugar Company. Exceptions
from January term. Hartwell for APP
pellaEts, Hatch for proponents.
Kahai =. Rose, appellant. Excep-
tons from January term. Achi for
plaintiff; Kinney for appellant.
Bishop & Co, appellants, VS.. Pacific
Navigation Company Exceptions
from January term. Hatch for appel
lants: Hartwell for proponents.
The King vs.. MakuaoIe. Appeal
from HiIo Police Court.