The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1888-05-27

49, 8vJ -
A. Rnry = a. I; vioasting the sam<
sosa Territory a washinsson " 3
X. Frszier; ssssuit and hssa<ry. AP
sag7. Territory Of Washington v.
John Bsrwick. selling spiritoous n
qutr - > minor.
aes. Terri.ery q Washington "
Patrick Gri0ksh. indecent exposure 81
a3se. Territory q wa-hisrton v.
T. n. BROMLEY; Keeping house Of H.
Ss0. Territory a Washington ".
Slammed Crawford resisting an o<1Ic<r.
sol. Territory q Washington ".
A. K Goodwin: assault With intent q
commit robbery.
500 Cisy q ssssaIe ". J. u. Quil-
ter. ob@trurtinx pubic ssree4.
1857 Territory Of Washington W.
William Glover; rppt<ry.
sos. Territory IT Washington vs..
Charles II. Crocker: grand larceny.
ax0. Territory Of Washington ~
Harry Grumers attempting to commit
robbery.
cSvsI Calaaaes.
1877. Granville o. HaIIer W. ". B.
More. Account.
z7ag- l.. solomon W. ID. A. 4 j. Nc
kinIay; pronzi<>ory note.
Z-ga. Arthur scfivener ~ Me;gs
Lumter and ship Building Company
pronsi-sory note.
2sB. Alfred Puariae W. James Faw-
cefs Il al. Accounting
s<<nru G~~~k ~ - Al Nm
Renfon Coal Company Ct al: eject
ment.
sg,a. Fred Gasch W. 7. J. White ei
n. Injunction suit
x5fa- Anthony Holmes Va Willard
X Aerwin. agreement.
SOL. A. Lfteei vs.. His Creditors, In
solvency.
s7s2. City Of Seattle W. D. L. Bax-
ter; assessment lien
xss2- City Of Seattle vs. J. r. Nc.
Nsught assessment lien
39s; City Of Seattle vs.. Thos- Clancy
assessment lien.
M. city Of Seattle vs.. James Nc
Naueht: assessment lien.
ax2s. City of Seattle Va Isaac Par
kerr. assessment lien
nm. City OF Seattle vs.. James Nc.
Naught and ID. b. Jackson; assessment
hen.
aGyl. City Of Seattle ". T. Maud: -
sessmenf lien.
a8s2. City Of Seattle vs. Joseph Nc
Saught: assessment lien.
3xi3. City of seattle vs. J. ". George
assessment lien.
SRA CITY of Seattle W James Nc
Naught: assessment lien.
xx35. City Of Seattle w. tn C. 4 r
4. n. II. Co. assessment lien.
xrB. City Of seattle w. Tbos- Clan
cy. assessment lien:
xns. City Of Seattlevs- j. W. Georg1
ct al; assessment lien.
aDt2. City of Seattle vs. James Nc
Naught, assessment lien-
40iG. Matthias and sfnithers, execu
tors and trustees Terry estate vs.
Henry l.. YesIer, injunction
40is. Mary A. Denny ct nj. vs.. Hen
~ l.. Yesler; Injunction
S2D J. n. Cooper vs.. l.. Reinig ei
al; account.
AIS. City of Seattle vs.. Matthias and
Smithers as executors Of Terry estate
foreclosure Of assessment lien.
432g J. X. 4 IL. II. Lewis vs.. Jones'
sen Bros. Ut al. account.
43t2. City of Seattle vs.. +. III. Lewis
assessment lien.
435D. Carrie Franklin vs.. John II
McGraw: rcplevin-
1864. Columbia & Puget sound Rail
road Company vs.. j. II. MeGraw
sheriff, etc: injunction. consolidated
with No, sgD.
1891. George r. Boyce vs.. Ansei
Hubert ct al account.
4l27. J. X. a II. II. Lewis W.. +. V.
Snyder; assigned lien.
ft52. NJ. s. Cody W. +. A. Thorn
dyke ct al promissory note.
f472. City Of Seattle vs.. d. N Bax-
ter; assessment lien.
4i73. City III Seattle vs.. =. II. Lewis
assessment lien.
4lsi. City Of Seattle VS.. Robert
Abrams ct al. assessment lien.
45is. wald & Campbell vs.. Con.
verse T. Farrar et al. account.
4521. Edmund T. Richmond vs.. The
Phoenix lns. Co. insurance policy.
1854. Forest City Furniture Com.
pany ct nj. vs.. John Leary ct al.
creditors bill for an accounting.
1850. VIM. NJ. Ladd vs.. w. ID. Scott
& Co. promiSsory note.
ASST. First National Bank Of Seattle
vs.. w. II. Scott & Co. mortgage
AIT. Calvin y. Whitney, VS.. W. ID.
Scott & Co.: account.
s5fp. Mary E.lKcnworthy W.. Sam
uel l.. Cullis; mortgage foreclosure.
l576. Mary A. Vestal vs.. James
Water. foreclosure OF mortgage.
1856. Isabella ii. Tilton W.. NJ. V. Il.
Stacy ct al special performance OF
contract
tssa George l.. Rice vs.. John Levy
eertiorari.
i70o. A. NJ. Snyder vs.. Curtis d.
Browniield; appeal
ga Andrew Jansen vs.. Nelson
McCallum, in equity.
AIS. James J.. Ludlow Va. Harry
Lott Ct al contract and damages.
asi3. W. Z. Sayward vs.. Henry
Price; account.
sSA. J. III. Robbins 4 Son W. Frank
Owens ct al. 10 reform certain con
scyances.
i91. John Arthur VS.. Jones & Ar
thur; money loaned.
1918. Louise Otto vs., &. II. Hanford
and Weston Minors, tn set aside trust
deed.
wv ~ N u. .. " ~ 70. w. N
Chtlberg; injunction consolidated Will
No. tv}i
tan. A. Harker vs. W. F. Crosby q
al. promissory note.
tssI. Oregon Improvement Co. "
Steamer Evangel; in aimiralty-ac'
count.
ieii, Ludwin Lundelin vs.. John W
Blake; appeal promissory note.
$3.50 &, & 7. ;. X. X. Co. vs.. City oi
Seattle ct al. injunction.
Sse. Geore nortIcl vs.. Eason II. and
Annie l.. Ebey; foreclosure mortgage
oi7. John III. Mc,iraw vs. J. J
Knott 81 al damages.
US. J. +. Mcknight W. X. Jeifs e,
al. injunction.
SSA. A. q. Sutherland ". Vim. A
Jennings et nj. premi~soyy note.
Sioi. City Of Seattle w. Henry l..
Yesler. assessment lien.
SliS, City Of seattle W. Cyrus Walk
or ei al, assessment hen.
Sis. Eshclman, liewellyn Co. Vs.
Edward u. Downing & Co; promis
sorry note.
siss. James NJ. Colman W. Seattl,
Lnm. & &, Go. Ct al injunction.
$751;. Wadhams & Elliot; vs.. Page 4
Green; account,
SssS. August Haycrcnmp ". Sea,tl,
Coal and Trans. Co. damages and in
junction.
seal. James Fulton vs.. r. Merchan
& Co. damages.
as9. Harrington & Smith vs.. Day
Rres. account
lEs.A Henry l.. Ycsier ~. y. L. Jan
sen ASSIGNED account
ASS-, Pauline Il. pcisson vs.. Admin
i>tratoFs vi the estate Of Nate Reagan
deceased, 81 al mortgage.