Idaho news. (Blackfoot, Idaho) 1887-1891, 1888-02-11
nAroLrSn wAs uxriIrnrrr
"a, --latest scnss,ion ,a the Carter Disors
Case.

-. Eaf.ss Sensation ta the Carter Dirorc
tsise.
Chicago special: Attorney leslie A
Carter filed to-day cross bill in IN,
divorce proceedings pending between
himself and his wife, Caroline Louis,
Carter. The allegations are rathe,
startling and have created decided
stir. The case is already well known
throughout the country, the high stand.
ing Of the defendant and the charges
preiered by Mrs Carter having made
rs outcome a matter of much interest
Now the cross bill with its sensational
charge that the wife has been guilty of
adultry with Kyrle Bellew, the well.
known English actor, at present playing
in New York, as well as with other men.
furnishes fresh charm for scandal
lovers.
The bill, after stating the standing Of
the case as il is at present in court, and
denying the charges made by complain
ant, says:
Your orator further represents that IN
the month Of August, 1885, at Cooners.
town, in the state of New York. said
Caroline Louise Carter, in utter disre-
gard and violation OF her marriage Vows
and obligations, committed adultery
with one James III. Pierce, and that at
divers times in the month of April, 1894
at the Brunswick hostelry in the city OF
New York, committed adultery with
one James b. Gilbert. Your orator
further represents and charges the fact
10 be that at divers dates in the months
OF September aud October, 1885, at tie
city Of New York, said Caroline Louise
Carter committed adultery and had ear
nal knowledge with one Kyrle Bellew.
Your orator represents, upon informa-
ton and belief and believing such
charges, that said Caroline Louise Car
ter has at divers times and places al the
said city OF New York, IN the city Of
Chicago, at CoOperstOwn, in the state Of
New York, at Paris, in the republic Of
France, at Basic, in the republic Of
Switzerland, az krenZnach. in Germany
and al divers other places, 10 your ora
tor unknown, committed adultery with
persons 10 your orator unknown Your
orator was wholly ignorant III tile guilt
Of Caroline I.onise Carter until IA or
about September 1886, aud subsequently, /
ANEEAAAs VII ahAasAAnA - ANsAfF AfANHAAtlU
Louise Carter, In spite Of his disapprOyal |
and against his protest left this country |
FOR Europe, departing abruptly and with.
out his knowledge OF that Of her mother |
or friends as lie believes AZ the earnest |
solicitations 0f Yonr orator and her /
mother she returned in the latter part Of 4
The same month, hut upon her return 1
she insisted upon going hack again TO 4
Europe. and finally, on October "a, 1855, l
although no expressly disapprOyed of /
her doing so aud used every effort 10 in
dnce her 10 remain with him and his 1
child, she again left for Europe since
the last mentioned date lac has not CO.
habited with her as his wife. When 1
told site llal sailed for Europe she gave 1
him 10 understand she would immcdi-
Sicily return. aud lee, subsequent 10 4
October e. 1855, urged her hy letter 10
do 80 Your orator represents further.
that, notwithstanding this, she remained 1
hbTltAl until September /, 1856, and tllRt
during heF absence she INDUCED ia
great c1trayasancrs and lOoSr conduct,
all u Whicl, Was unknown 10 him until 4
about said month % September. 1850.
He believes she expended upwards 81
81, 600 during said absence. Your ora
Tor further represents that during this
absence Caroline Louise Carter - CON
ducted herself with men as 10 acquire
thoroughly hai reputation, which your
orator now believes she dcHeryed.
On ar about September !, ise6, Caro-.
limo Louise Carter sailed from Liverpool
for Nuw York city aud purlsosely con-
ccaled tho fact from him. For the pur-
pose II dccciying him regarding this
clandek,ino trip she, prior 70 her dcpar-
turc. wrote In London n series Of letters
dated September 3, 10 aud IL, 1886.
These abe left behind her 10 be mailed
70 him AZ intervals corresponding with
tho dates. ~ your orntor might believe
she WAS stili In England, whereas the
fact vas she vas in New York.
Mr.. Carter says he does not know her
reason for this conduct, hnt says when
he learned 81 II he cndcayored % induce
her 10 return home. Instead she sailed
again for Europe on October ., 1886
Although having just grounds Of com.
PLANT against her for extravaganza and
tmprudsnt conduct, he did not believe
her uniAithtul 60 her marriage vows
until rumors, taken in connection with
her general behavior, her frequent trips
TO Europe, her extraordinary cxtraya-
ganco aud imprtidcnt acts, led him re-
luc,antly TO regard her conduct with the
grayest suspicion, which resulted IN his
ascertainiug that she Inns been repeated
y guilty 81 adultry from 1852 M 10 and
since September. 1880. aud even since
a H.. 1 4 4.