The Stark County Democrat. [volume] (Canton, Ohio) 1833-1912, 1888-10-18
Legal Notice.
George Lucau. Plaintiff,
octlllv

George Lucas, ralntn,
Mary Condy Of al, Defendants,
Mary oondy the unknown heirs o. Mary condy
Ann UOn1y, tho unknown holta Of Ann uondy fred-
orlck n, Poet tho unknown heirs OF Frederick r.
Poet samuel Hitchcock the unknown helru OF Sam
nsl liiteheocs Jamea Patterson .he unanowe helm
helra OF James Duncan VIII take notice that on iho
iIth day OF OCTOBER lth tho plaintiff illcd his pa
efu IN the oniou OF Tho Clerk o Common Pleas Court
OF SlAft county Ohio. aettng forth that no 10 tho
owner ~ fco OF lot No. one ~ ~ shown on the plat
OF the Village Of Navarro IA hhld county OF stark
also that tho parties under whom no olAlna have
been tho twn6ra Of said promises IN fee simple oon.
tlnuoualy ulnee April Rblh, lbOe tlat on fehruafy
tnnt thereafter while the owner OF said lot said
Jonathan Condy died, leaving Mary condy and Ann
eondy his only hclfa ~ law that said Ann aud MARY
COndy April Goth, 1891 executed and delivered 10
Isaac llOnaa their doodh OF qultoAlin conveying "
him all their interest In said promaoa but said deeds
nor recorded leaving link N tho chain OF tho title
70 hlld premsca that thereafter rAd lot wah owned
IN foe by Isaac BonsAi, that no conveyed Tho aamo
70 james Duncan, who In turn conveyed tho aame "
Richard 0Oe but by tho neglect Of tho aaid doc hla
said deed was NJ no tmo put on the records OF stark
county, leaving another LINK ~ the chain of Aad title
10 said lot Said petition further rocltca tho several
graniors and grantees OF the said lot through whom
tho title thereof came 10 this planting and further
reeltca that oil Of said pnftloe have held 0pen nOtO
roua and undlhpuied possession OF Aaid promlAoa
from 1907 and until tho Ming of this pehtlon Also
that while Henry 0rlhol Zone " tho paftea through
whom plaintiff claims was the owner OF said l0t) hn
executed mortgage decd OF the aamo 70 Samuel
Hitchcock and Frederick n Peot 10 secure tho pay-
mont OF ono thousand dollars. that AAld mortgage
was aitormard paid by said uflbo and was aAtlAned
and discharged but that no record Of anoh aAiafao-
tion aud dlachargo was ever made on tho mortgage
record OF stark county the petition further rocltoa
that while William Kno, another ono 0f the parties
through whom plalntif onlmA was tho ownor OF aald
lot ho executed pretended mortgage OF the aAmo
" James Patterson pretending ~ secure tho pay
ment OF ol,u7l,OO, that said mortgage wAa dated
May -, ih7b and was duo September, 1870, that The
same was talso ana fraudulent ana was Intended 10
hinder ana delay the creditors from collecting their
luht clhlmH thnt thd mortgage was without anvi
consideration whatever Tho petition prnyH TINT the
plaintiff may DO docrcod 10 bo Tho solo owor OF aad
lot free from any Interest thofon OF any or All Inc
deiondnhtnnAmcdin ~ aAd petition. That Mary COndy
and Ann U0ndy, or tholr unknown hora and Jamcs
Duncan with hla unknown hcru, bo ordered ana do
creed 70 convoy 70 tho plaintiff all their nteresn In
tho promises IN foo simple, that IN default thereof
within dny named that tho docr0b OF thlh tjouri
may operate hg such conveyance OF said lot that the
defendants and their unknown holra ba forever on.
Joined from claiming any right or title 10 said prem.
laoa that tho said mortgage from Henry Orbol 10
W bo fully paid and bo doorcod cancelled on The
record and daohnrgodl that tho mortgage from
william kllno " James Patterson DO declared faiao
ana fraudulent without consideration, and be or.
dorcd cancelled on tho rot0rd that all clOudn on tho
plAlntlfa title, m In said petition moro fully nrt
forth, may be removed, and ho he Quloied In Inc
ano ana lor ~ proper roller 10 whleh he N entitled
sAld petition VIII be for hcariug on and after the
dEOR0E LUCAS, Plaintiff.
October i0ih, lt8s-la.Lw