The Brookhaven leader. [volume] (Brookhaven, Miss.) 1883-1891, 1888-08-16
TALMAGiG'S SERMON.
People Who Believe the Bible in
Spots Only.
Orthodoxy Neither stale Nor Unreason-
able - Freedom of Thought-Two
Death Bed Scenes-Important
Questions Answered.

which we give herewith. His text was:
Ask for the old paths, where is the good way,
and walk therein. and We shall find rpst for
your souls Jeremiah, vi. i6
And answered the question: "Is ortho-
doxy stale and unTeesonable?"
A great London fog has come down
upon some o. the ministers and some Of
the Churches in the shape of what is
calIeu advanced thought" in Biblical
Interpretation. All of them, and without
any exception, deny the full inspiration
of the Bible. Genesis is an allegory, aud
there are many myths in the Bible, and
they philosophize and guess and reason
and evolute until they land in great
continent OF mud, from which, fear, for
oil eternity they will not be able to extrI-
cate themselves.
The Bible is not only divinely inspired,
but 1t is divinely protected in its present
shape. You could as easily, without de-
lection, take from the writings of Shakes
peare's Hamlet and institute in place
thereof Alexander Smiths drama, as at
any time dTring the last fifteen hundred
years p man could have made any impor-
tap. change IN the Rible without imme-
diate detection. II there has been an
element of weakness, or Of deception, or
o. disiutegration, the Book would long
ago have fallen to pieces. II there had
been one loose brick or cracked easement
in this castellated truth, surely the bonn
bardment of eight centuries would have
discovered and broken through that i'm
perfection. The fact that the Bible
stands intact notwithstanding all the
furious assaults on all sides upon it, is
proof to me that ii is q miracle, and every
miracle is of God.
But" says some one, ''while we ad-
nit the Bible is of God, il has not been
understood until our time" Ny answer
is, that if the Bible is letter from God,
our Father, to man, His child. IS 1t not
strange that that letter should have been
written in such way That it should al
low seventy generations to pass away and
be buried before the letter could be I'M
derStoodI That would be a very bright
father Who should write a letter for the
guidance and intelligence of his children
no. understandable until thous and years
after they were buried and forgotten.
While, as the years roll on, other beauties
and excelences will unfold from the
Scriptures, that the Bible is such dead
failure that all the Christian scholars for
eighteen hundred years were deceived in
regard to vast reaches of its meaning, is
n demand upon my credulitr 50 great
that if found myself at all disposed to
yield to it, | should tomorrow morning
apply at some insane asylum as unfit to
go alone.
Who make up this precious group of adj
Vanced thinkers to whom God has made
especis.I revelation in our time of that
which He tried to make known thousands
Of years ago, and failed to make intelli-
gible? Are they so distinguished for I'M
worldliness, piety and scholarship that it
is to be expected that they would have
been chosen to fix up the defective work
OF Moses, and Isaiah, and Paul, and
Christ? Is it at all possible? l wonder
on what mountain these modern axegetes
were transfgured?t wonder what star
pointed down to their birthplace? Was
il the north star, or the evening star, or
the dipper? As they came through and
descended to our world did Mars blush or
Saturn lose one Of its rings? When |
find these modern wiseacres attempting
TO improve upon the work of the Almighty
and to interlard it with their WIS.,
dom and to suggest prophetic and apOs-
tolic errata am filled with disgust in
sufferable. Advanced thought, which pro-
poses to tell the Lord what He ought to
have said thousands of years ago, and
would have said if He had been as wise as
His nineteenth century critics! All this
comes Of living away back in the eterni-
ties instead OF 1888. have two wonders
in regard to these men. The first one is
how the Lord got along without them be-
fore they were born. The second wonder
is how the Lord will get along without
them after they are dead.
"But" say some, ''do you really think
the Scriptures are inspired throughoutw
Yes, either as history or as guidance.
Gibbon and Josephus and Prescott record
in their histories a great many things
they did not approve of. When George
Bancroft puts upon his brilliant his
tOrical page the account of an Indian
massacre, does he approve of that mas
sacre? There ale scores Of things in the
Bible which neither God nor inspired
men sanctioned. Either as history or as
guidance, the entire Bible was inspired
of God.
but" says some one, don't you think
that the copyists might have made mis-
takes in transferring the Divine words
from one manuscript to another?" Yes,
no doubt there were such mistakes; but
they no more affect the meaning of the
Scriptures than the misspelling of a
word or the ungrammatical structure of
sentence in last will and testament af e
feet the validity or the meaning of that
will. All the mistakes made by the
copyists in the Scriptures do not amount
to any more Importance than the diff err
ence between your spelling in a docu-
ment the word forty or fourty. This
book is the last will and testament of
God to our lost world, and it bequeaths
every thing in the right way, although
human hands may have damaged the
grammar or made uniustif able inter-
polation.
These men who pride themselves in our
day on being advanced thinkers in Biblic-
al Interpretation will all of them end in
atheism if they live long enough, and l
declare here o-day, they are doing more
in the different denominations of Chris
tians, and throughout the world, for dam
aging Christianity and hindering the
cause of the worlds betterment than five
thousand Robert Ingersolls could do.
That man who stands inside castle is
far more dangerous if he be an enemy
than five thousand enemies outside the
castle. Robert G. Ingersoll assails the
castle from the outside. These men who
pretend to be advanced thinkers in all
denominations are fighting the truth
from the inside, and trying to shove back
the bolts and swing open the gates.
Now, am in favor of the greatest free
dom of religious thought and discussion.
would have as much liberty for hetero-
doxy as for orthodoxy. If l should change
my theories of religion 1 should preach
them out and out, but not in the building