The Waco daily examiner. [volume] (Waco, Tex.) 187?-1888, 1888-03-21

~ Hclchs, IL ls our OplulOu that thp
passage OF said tariff blu would ms
'erialiy ihjure or destroy the cattle
ank wool growing interest, therefore
solved, Tha' E,H. *. -. Mil.
Il eS not represent the Ninth district
nor The state OF Texas ~ his position.
mat his course teuds to DESTROY the
mstorial industries of his coustitu-
ency.
Resolved, That Wa deprecate the
course OF MIR. Mills and hereby put
Ourselves on record in hearty condem-
hatlon of his conduct and his bill.
Resolved, That we CO slider his a.
ton i'll tend ring protection to the
powerful and pAmpercd industries OF
Ge east and North aud Withholding it
from the struggling industries of mis-
oWn constituency uudemocratic. un-
patriotic aud uurepresentative
Resolved, That we condemn the
Providence speech Of MIR. Mills,
wherein he gu lranteed protection to
Rhode Island people, and agreed t.
rob Texas people
Resolved, That, forsaken by our
owh representative we urge upon our
senators aud representatives. in con-
gross to work against the Mills bill.
and we call upon all good meu from
other states TO protect Texas if her
own representatives. fail to do so.
Resolved, That protection on raw
Wool Is purely protection to the pro-
uucer' me Ill. IN 'r as Wei as the sheeG
niAll au" snoulu De malh'a'heu' Ana
n"''I! -,
'9oiNo", INA IL MI MUS pe'SisuS
~ "uu urges the pF"poseu r7nl"Na Oh
INC uuVy on wool and nlues that IL Is
Iae sense OF TINS, representa- We
'dy OF ms constituency, that he aOdl-
ctle MS seat, anu mat hereal er we
VIII withhold our support at the bal
lot box and elsewhere
An analysis OF the vote taken upon
the resolution shows the following
political statutes Of the voters. Those
Young we're }. W. Higgins. II l..
Cartr ght >. w. Emory, w. j.. HAL,
/. y kirkland, j. f Stone, Jo. 5.
! thompson, y. wheeler, all prohibi-
tonlstS Ill. Il Conger, I. 4 Congar,
j. Is Payne, republicans; w. L. Al
lem, f ). Asbburn, Geo. lloehn, w
A. Payne, dem )crais; not voting, IL.
u Patton, >. A. owens aud w W..
oe,Gy'
MI a. r. CoTulps Was ca leu
upoo lof u sp9eGn oul ul echeu
Nv A.u no ""9 onil
u'oP'il Al anu no1 'l1iiipo' vi Uuo
assoc '"loh'
Mr. W. a PoAge sud that he was
opposed to the resolution rs the as
ISOLATION was not applitlcAl organiz4-
ton. Mr II ggns sad That Mr.. Mills
b'l' was direct Y opposed to the N
terests Of he live stock owners, aud
1T was "a ma ter OF vital importance.
Iha' Mr. MUS had gone lnlo state
mat mao hau us interests protected o{,
Voe 'af'll l'f h'lAurea year,, ana
p'oliil'eu W protecV Uhelh "hllo texas
perlsheu. lha' Is was lhe guy Oh
ne Il'o 9'och own IRIS anu NILS cor
sVi.uon'7 - plnh' Vnolr leet urih1Y III
opposing Su'n "a measure ana
t$ach MI NILS lesson
MI u 20 ea'u luaO Uue WuoIe
country uelhahueu cheap clotnihg,
'haC lh' resolu'l'h was po!ltlcai
anu ne scenIeu uh"er III lhe prom OF
tioh pFrJudlce against Mr. M'll'
lnaC IL uiu hoI uc Ill anu the consider
aIioh on the assoc'a'loh-
Mr.. higgins said hat he had not
thought OF prohibition in Offering the
resolution. That Mr.. Poage's speech
| showed that he was not posted on
inc VI nus plil lhat tne reason ne was
opposed 10 inc 'aFlh o!li was because
ne wanted cheaper clothes, out MT
Mills hau taken OH Tue protecu'h
from "ool Duo wanted 10 raise ~ on
n.l