The Hawaiian gazette., 1888-04-17
Supreme cears,-Aprn Term. 1855

Supreme CeGrs,-APril Terra. ISSS.
ASSoCIArs JUSTICE DOLE PRESIDING,
MONDAY, April 9th,
Collector-G General OF Customs vs.. w.
:. Lace. ASSnmpSit, Decision on de-
fsnGantsS demurrer, SrSUei and sub
united On the Ssh inst, is rendered
snd the demurrer allowed. Appeal
noted.
Colleeto-~General Of Customs VI. H.
r MsefsrlSne. ASS1mpSit. Decision
! rendered on 6sfen6ant's demurrer,
argued sni submitted on the Sth inst,
ana the demurrer allowed. Appeal
noted
Colleetor-General Of Customs vs.
Geo. w. MSefsrlSne < Co. AsSump-
sit. Defendants demurrer, argued
and submitted on the 5th inst. Is al
lOursi. Appeal noted,
The King ". LuiOSwik0. Selling
SpiriJU0uS hQEors without license on
the 18th Of February. Defendant ap-
pe6lS from the Police Court Of Homo
lulu, where, on the 99th OF February,
he wsS found guilty and fined $50 and
$ costs. Deputy Acknowledgement
for the Crown, hSUIUkOu and POsp0e
for defendant.
Juro-s-JameS Nett, \. L Louisson.
T. W. Wood, t. X. Moore. w. II. Ne
LeSn, l. y Trip r. w. POdmOre, J.
D. Tucker, VIM LAM, Allan Herbert,
Pierre JONES sud :. Ephraim.
Verdict, NOT guilty, three Jurors
dissenting.
TUESDAY,. April 10th.
The King vs. Lum Hung and All
Choy or An Chez. Gambling. De-
feRisnIS appeal from the Police Court,
HOu0Iulu, where. Dec. 18th, Lum
Hung vas fined $500 with impriSOn-
nenE three days aud costs s. Is, All
ChOy $50 and costs 81 Is. Deputy At
tOrney-GeuersI for the Crown; W. r.
Castle for Lum Hung and A. Resa for
An Ch0y- Jury return verdict, two
dissenting, u guilty a. charged in the
case Of Lum Hung and similar YER
dict. one dissenting, in the case Of An
Ch0y- The defense excerpts 70 the
verdict.
The King v. George Summers.
Larceny, rirSt degree Deputy At
t0ruey-GeneFaI for the Crown. defsn-
dant in person Verdict, guilty. in the
third degree
WEDNESDAY. April Ilth.
The King ~ Lum Hung and An
Ch0y. Gaming. Found guilty on the
IJCh- Lum Hung l. fined $500, costs
$ =, Snd gets Two months impriSOu-
meur with hard labor An ChOy Is
fined 500 and costs IS "a
sam Shing v. All Hung ct al Debt.
Verdict for plaintiff. Damages $50
allowed Exceptions are noted by
plSiu1Itf- Hatch for plaintiff, Hart
well for defendant
The King vS. Ching Wal. Gaming.
On motion Of prosecution for forfeiture
q bond, DEFENDANTS b0udSmAn Is aOti-
led 20 appear. Deputy Attorney Gen
eral for the Crown no appearance for
defendant
The King V. George Summers Lar
esly, third degree Sentenced 10 hard
labor three months and fined 81 and
costs SO 50
J. : Martin ". L B Kerr. As
Sumpsft. Defendaat's demurrer i
argued and submitted Y. Y. Ashford
for plaintiff, 4 C. Smith for defend
ant
W R. Castle vs.. Leoug Kit. All Tim
and ASEau- AsSUmpsir. Plaintiffs
motion for default Of defendants, All
Tim Snd LeouE hit. 10 answer. Order
ed that they are IN default. the clerk
to assess Plaintiffs claim and judg-
msut 70 be entered with costs ". r.
Castle plaintiff, in person no appear
4uce OF or for Defendants
AuoHz Ct 81 " D. kamai. Assump-
sit Affidavit and motion Of defend
AM 10 change venue 10 the Third Judi
cizI Circuit for trial 81 next Nav Term
81 HIlo. The plaintiff eouseating, the
venue i ordered changed accordingly.
THURSDAY, April Eth.
J. :. Martin vs l. B. Kerr, trespass-
Plaintiff complaint, filed March Eth.
alleges that he E1s falsely charged, in
HOHOluIa, January 9th, with embez-
Element. that his residence was
searched that he was assaulted and
arrested, etc TO his damage IN the
sum Of $500.
Ashford & Ashford for plaintiff, 4.
: HzrtFeu and 4 C. Smith for de-
PENDANTS
JuroT-Pierre Jones, P. c Jones, z
J. Spaldiag, E : Cu1ha, T. K Moore,
J. D. Tucker, s Ephrzim, F. W
Wood 4 n Trip, James Mott, W
H Mclean, P. Opfs7geIt. Verdict for
plaintiff for 1000.
FRIDAY April 18Th
Mr. Justice Dole announced that
Mr. justice Preston would preside
during IizE. trial 0f the case Of Thomas
versus Ml.Iuerny
Z B Thomas v. VI MeIneruy. A.
sUmpsIE- r NJ Hatch and Cecil
Brown for plaintiff W i Whiting
and l. : HartEreu for defendant
The complaint Of plaintiff fled March
IzEh- alleges that defendant Is indebted
TO him n the sum Of sails $ for
services and labor done By plaintiff
and material furnished at Defendants
instance and request and that defeu-
daut 1egle-tz and refuses TO pay the