The Austin weekly statesman. (Austin, Tex.) 1883-1898, 1888-10-11
THE COURTS.
Proceedings IN the District and
County Courts Yesterday.
Legal and Other Items Picked up
by Statesman Reporters Around
the Court House.
COUNTY COURT.
From Thursdays Daily. !

IL Wills SOuLt gSSbc4udN9 DEdChSu-
ridge presiding, the following proceedings
were had:
Meyer Bros. i Co. VS.. NJ. j. Cohen; con-
! tinued for service.
Wstertown company VS.. A. ]. Beedy.
City of Austin vs.. Fl. Spillmsn ct al;
dismissed.
Nelson, Davis d Co. vs.. Herman Muller;
judgment by default for $239.50, and in
| terest at per cent from date of judg
meut.
State of Texas vs.. Demees l. Strickland;
dismissed.
P. A. Fitzhugh VS.. Missouri Pacific Rail-
way company; set for Friday, 18th, at 10
a. N.
j. A. Rhomberg vs.. Hugo A. Buaas;
continued for service.
Smith Bros. & Co. Va. f. E. Jones; judg-
ment by default for 1856 81, with interest
from January l, 1888, at s per cent per
annum,
Rosenheim, Lewis & Co. VS.. A. G. Buck
ner; judgment by default for $436, with
10 per cent interest from date on note.
Flash, Preston & Co. VS.. Phil Abrahams;
judgment by default for $346.47 and in
terest at per cent from date.
Flash, Preston & Co. VS.. Len G. Hill;
judgment by default for $60548 and 10
| terest at per cent per annum.
City of Austin VS.. G. W. Kern ct al; dis
missed
James H. Raymond & Co. VS.. w. H.
Bunton; judgment by default for $493 SO
and u per cent interest from date.
Frank Hamilton, trustee, VS.. French &
Browne; judgment by default for 1927
and interest at u per cent from date.
Orleans Manufacturing company vs.. S.
W. French ct al; set for October Goth.
Nelson Davis g. Co. vs.. l.. l.. Reed; con-
tinusd for service.
Nelson Davis g. Co. VS.. P. and L. Insur-
surance company, garnisheei set for Oc-
tober 6th.
j. L. Kelly vs., Gus wilke ct al; dis
missed.
L. s. McCutcheon VS.. W. S. Lee,
ct al; judgment by default for S19665,
and interest from dats at y per cent.
M. E. Raiey VS.. A, H. Cook ct al; judy
ment by default for $216SO, with interest
at II per cent.
P. j. Willis d Bro. VS.. A. Achilles; judg-
ment by default for 1888 "a, with per
cent interest from date.
Houghton g. Robinson VS.. A. J. Mill
ham ct al; Judgment by default for
SAT- 30, with interest at II per cent from
date.
Houghton g. Robinson VS.. H. @. Purl ct
al; judgment by default for 1888 80, with
interest from date at y per cent.
L. oh. Blum vs.. a. Achilles; judgment
by default for $371.75 and interest at 8
per cent from date.
New Orleans News company VS.. Edwards
d Co.; judgment by default for 1921 43
and iutere 4 from date at 8 per cent.
Chas. Petit VS.. Drill association; set for
November l, 10 a. m.
st. Mary's academy Va. August Tiede-
man; set for Monday, October s, 10 a. m.
From Fridays DAILY
COUNTY COURT.
In this court yesterday, Judge Bracken-
ridge, presiding, the following proceed
ings were had:
Burns & Wray VS.. L. Eek; judgment for
defendant for $24475.
W. j. Lemp vs.. Fl. G. Purl; Judgment
by default for $3.50.
From Saturdays Daily
DISTRICT COURT.
State vs.. j. E. McCallister; judgment
for plaintiff for 1925.
E. f. Peele VS.. VIM. I. Phillips; judg-
ment for plaintiff for $4,000.
State vs.. Colorado Cattle company;
judgment for plaintiff for $2,425.
State VS.. j. E. Darlington; judgment
for plaintiff for $500.
R. G. Hale vs.. w. H. Bunton ct al. judg-
ment for plaintiff for $824.5O.
KEN Miller vs. James NJ. White; judy
ment for plaintiff.
NJ. A. Taylor VS.. G. Gibson; Judgment
for plaintiff.
L. NJ. @ cooker vs. James Dietrich; judg-
ment for u intiff for 1894 80.
Scottish Anrtgage company vs.. j. L.
Drishill q Rtney; judgment for plain
tiff for al" mt of notes, interest and at
torney'5 f. :.
j. W. Biting VS.. A. Alexander; iudg-
ment for plaintiff.
Joel j. Bailey g. Co., vs.. A. Achilles;
judgment for plaintiff.
Ohas. Wolf vs.. E. Hillmau ct al; judg-
ment for plaintiff.
G. W. Darel vs.. T. R. Harrell ct al;
Judgment for plaintiff.
Chas. Wolf VS.. Hill jones' judgment for
plaintiff.
Mrs. L. G. Pease VS.. Stacy & Hicks;
Judgment for plaintiff.
for plaintiff.
DISTRICT COURT.
In this court yesterday, Judge Key, pre-
siding, the following divorce cases were
disposed of:
Mary Smith vs.. Henry Smith; granted,
John McCuistiau VS.. A. p. MoUuistian;
granted.
Thomas D. Scott VS.. Mary Scott;
granted.
Several cases were held up until next
Saturday, the witnesses being absent.
COUNTY coURT-PRoBATE DOCKET.
Estate of Thomas Enron, deceased;
final accounts approved u. T. |
Fillmore appointed to represent parties,
c. w. Daniel, R. NJ. Thorn pson and Jos.
Spence appointed commissioners etc.
Tonville minors; new bonds filed by
j. w. Burleson, guardian.
Fleet estate; new bond filed by j. W.
Burleson, guardian.
Sale of property ordered in Morris
guardianship.
Sale of property ordered in Kesse guar
dianship.