The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1888-02-15

action for successive actions cannot be prose-
cuted. Il is proper for the plaintiff to prove
all injuries that might naturally and approx
matey result from the construction and opera
tiop of the railroad. Remote or speculative
damages cannot be recovered
1906. Isaac Seton w. James II Hargett ct
al Decatur G. G. Affirmed MITCHELL e. j.
When one surety a note by an arrangement
with the principal became the debtor he may in
q suit against him as surety oy an assignee OF
the note plead answer by way OF sef-oH,
showing that as surety for the original payee he
had paid note for such payee before the latter
had assigned the note in suit, and that the lat
ter was VIGOROUSLY nsolvent II did not matter
that the assignee had no knowledge of the
lations existing between the parties executing
the note.
14lgI. Jacob B. Henry vs. State Marion
G. G. Affirmed Niolack. i'll An afddavis
which charges that the defendant on etc. at
etc., did then and there unla wfuly sell TO S.
W. and J. 3. a less quantity than quart of in
toxicatine liquor, about four ells, for the sum
of 10 cents, to be drunk as . beverage, said
10Th day of July. 1887, being the first day of the
week, commonly called Sunday as TO all OF
which afiant was informed etc. is not bad for
duplicity. 2 The evidence sho-'s that Watts
and Brown went upon the streets of Indianapo-
lie one Sunday in quest of something to drink
in the nature of Intoxicating liquor Iney
were directed to appellants saloon. the front
door of which was closed. They Went
into hau adjoining the saloon, where they met
an old man who seemed to have a room on an
upper floor. On ascertaining what they wanted,
the old man invited them up stairs into room
where there was a peculiar table, which proved
to be q dumb waiter. Upon some kind OF mo-
ton from the old man the parties put 10 cents
on the waiter and stepped into an adjoining
room. They heard a creaking of something go
ing down and coming back Upon being in
vited to return they found two glasses of beer,
which they drank. Held: joint sale 10 both
parties. f3.) Il is sufficient in such AFFIDAVIT to
alleRe the name Of tho purchaser by which he is
commonly known, though differing from his
true or bapIismal name.
SUPERIOR COURT.
Room 1-Hon. N. b. Taylor. Judge.
Mary E. Dittemore vs.. John W. Dittemore;
divorce. Divorce refused both parties.
Room 2-Hon. D. w. Howe. Judge.
Mary Decker vs. Jacob Becke.; damages.
Taken under Amusement.
Samuel Tr1thpo VS.. Wilbur F. Christian; dam
ages. On trial by jury.
Sarah Ann Coates IS City of Indianapolis.
Room s-Hon Lewis G. Walker, judge.
Hiram j. Cahill va Louisa Stringer ct al; to
set aside conveyance. On trial by jury
NEW SUITS FILED.
Aaron Plant vs. Esmond g. Marks; complaint
on account Demand, $400.
William T. Rhoads, administrator. VS.. Thomas
Grant ct al; compiaint note. Demand, 500.
William +. Rhoads. administrator, VS.. John
M. Thomas ct al. complaint on note. Demand.
sl35.
John e. McKendry ct al. VS.. Sinker. Davis g.
Co.; complaint, for damages Demand, 1000.
Nicholas Hilg vs.. Ct. III. Wureler; complaint
IN repleVln ana damages. Demanus PoV.
City OF Indianapolis We. Salvador Bruno.
Transcript
CIRCUIT COURT.
Hon. Thomas L.. Sullivan, Judge.
DR.. j. H. Singleton ct al. vs. Board of County
Commissioners; account On trial by jury.
Allan w. Hendricks admitted to practice.
CRIMINAL COURT.
Bon. VIM Irwin. Judge.
State VS.. Edward Powell, petit larceny; trial
by jury. Found guilty and sentenced to the
penitentiary for eighteen mouths. 4sD#
State VS. Frank Powell and Charles Daven-
port, grand larceny Pleaded not guilty. Dav-
EXPORT elects TO have.a separate trial On trial
by jury.