The Hawaiian gazette. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1865-1918, 1888-01-03
supreme Court q The Hawaiian
I'l3aa'


(January Term, beginning Monday, Janu-
airy ?, 1881
Chief Justice Judd, presiding; Hon. c. W.
Ashford, Attorney General.
Following is the calendar for the Term:
HAWAIIAN JuRY-Thursday, January 9th.
Kaainoa vs.. Reaweamahi. Damage. Cas-
tie for PLAINTIFF Achi for defendant.
Estate of Mauae Probate appeal A. c..
Smith for plaintiff; W. l.. Holokahiki for
defendant.
Okuu vs.. Kaiaikawaha. Replevin. Rosa
for plaintiff, Smith d Kinney for defendant
Kahai vs. Rose. Case. Achi for plaintiff;
Hatch for defendant.
Kahoopai VS.. Kaai. Criminal conversa-
ton. Smith IL Kinney for plaintiff Neu-
mann and Rosa for defendant.
Keamulu VS.. Luhau. Ejectment. Hatch
for plaintiff; Smith Il Kinney for defendant
MIXED JURY.
Kahoohuli VS.. Hamauku. Eiectment. Rosa
and Peterson for plaintiff; Smith d Kinney
for defendant.
All Fat VS.. Uilama Malicious prosecution.
Smith u Kinney for plaintiff; Rosa for de-
PENDANT.
Kaaukai VS.. Wight Eiectment. Achi for
plaintiff; Smith Il Kinney for.defendant.
Cartwright VS.. Kanoelehua. Ejectment
Smith u Kinney for plaintiff; Achi for de-
PENDANT.
Rego vs.. Alapai. Case V. V. Ashford for
plaintiff Smith " Kinney for defendant
FOREIGN JURY.
The King VS.. All Sam. Selling opium.
Neumann and Hatch for The Crown Smith
~ Kinney for defendant.
The King vs.. Lee Wo Yin. Selling opium.
Neumann and Hatch for the Grown; Smith
IL Kinney for defendant.
The King VS.. Lum Hung. Selling opium.
Neumann and Hatch for the Crown; Smith
IL Kinney for defendant.
The King VS.. Chun Lung. Selling opium.
Smith IL Kinney for the Crown; Neumann d
Hatch for defendant.
The King vs.. Hawkins and Silva. Con-
spiracy. Attorney General for the Crown.
Smith Il Kinney for defendants.
The King vs.. Choy Yin, W. Perjury. At
torney-General for the Crown.
The King vs.. Rudolph. Larceny-fourth
degree. Attorney General for the Crown.
V. V. Ashford for defendant.
The King VS.. All Tuck. Murder. Attor-
ney- General for the Crown.
The King VS.. Summers Larceny-second
degree. Attorney General for the Crown.
McOhesney VS.. Wong Ohun Kee. Assump-
sit. Ashford Il Ashford for plaintiff; Neu-
mann for defendant.
King Brothers VS.. Tavernier. Assumpsit.
Magoon for plaintiff; Hatch for defendant.
Tuck Wo Lung VS.. Ephraim. Damage.
Castle for plaintiff; Neumann for defendant.
Lo Kwong VS. Kan Ian See. Case. Rosa
fpr rIaiptiff. NaDu,anr1 for laFar1orf
Schaefer VS.. Willfong. Assumpsit. Hatch
for plaintiff; Dole for defendant.
Lunalilo Trustees VS.. Waihee Sugar Co.
Eiectment. Hartwell for plaintiff.
Gay VS.. Mendonca. Covenant. Hartwell
for plaintiff; Hatch for defendant.
Antoine VS.. Gonveia. Covenant. Castle
for plaintiff.
= BANCo-Tuesday, January Sd.
In re Victoria FORBADE. Appeal of Fernan-
DEE. Nullity of marriage. V. V. Ashford for
plaintiff; Smith d Kinney for defendant.
Kane VS.. Nakaleka, appellant. Exceptions
from October Term. Smith d Kinney for
respondent; Neumann for appellant.
Perrett vs.. Kaaa, appellant. Exceptions
from October Term. Smith d Kinney for
respondent; Castle tor appellant.
Cartwright. appellant, VS.. Everett. Excep-
LiOHS AEOA OClOOCL Wultluk IL
Creighton for appellant; Smith & Kinney
for respondent.
Parke VS.. Ami & Alsu. appellants. Writ
of error. Whiting d Creighton for respon
dent; Ashford d Ashford for appellants.
Kanakanui, appellant, vs. Leslie. Equity
appeal from Judd, G. j. Aehi for appellant;
Hatch for respondent.
Willfong, appellant vs.. Patty. Equity APP
peal from Judd, G. J. Dole for appellant;
Hatch for respondent.
Kiau Tai, appellant, VS.. All In. Equity
appeal from McCully, j. Neumann and
Hsrtwell for appellant; Smith & Kinney for
Spencer vs. Dodd, appellant. Exceptions
from October Term. Rosa for respondent;
Neumann for appellant.
DIVORCES.
johnson W., VS.. Johnson k. Castle for
plaintiff.
Nawilia W., vs. Brush k. Smith i Kinney
for plaintiff.
Foss k, VS.. Foss ". Whiting d Creighton
for plaintiff.
Keau k, VS.. Keau W. Poepoe for plaintiff.
Manchester W., VS.. Manchester k. Kane
for plaintiff.
Miller W, VS.. Miller X. Whiting 81 Cre1sh-
ton for plaintiff.
Kapi k, vs.. Kalua W. Brown for plaintiff
Kspu k. vs.. Kaaumoana W. Brown for
plaintiff.
Guess k, vs.. Guess W. Kane for plaintiff
Wong Tai Poon k, VS.. Wong Tai Poon W.
Rosa for plaintiff.
Kui k, VS.. Kaloaaole W. Rosa for plain
tiff.
Supreme Court-At Chambers,