St. Paul daily globe., 1888-05-22
He GOBBLED Her MONEY.
That Is What HRS. Catharine Lalier
Says of Her Husband.
rs HE NOT A BIGAMIST :?
John W. Gregg Must Furnish His Wife
With Funds---Crininal Rounded
Up---Miscellany.


she married Peter Lalier, who was
brother of her deceased husband; that
she supposed and he represented that
he was single man, but she has since
learned that he had another wife llv-
ing. She says that at the time of her
marriage with Lalier she was worth
considerable money and property. On
April 81. 1883, she was ill and believed
that she would not live. She then de-
posted 81 900 in the Germanla bank, re-
ceiving in return certificate of deposit.
She placed this certificate in box in
her room, and Lalier, without her
knowledge or consent, took the certifi-
cate and had it caShed, and deposited
the 81 1000 in his own name in the Ger
mania bank. AS soon as she discovered
it she demanded of Peter that he pay
her the money, but he refused. She
asked for an order enjoining the bank
from paying the money to him, and
temporary injunction was granted.
GRANTED THE sINEwS OF LAW.
On the 10th instant Jane NJ. Gregg
sued for divorce from John w. Gregg.
Her bill of complaint sets forth that they
were married in Appleton, Wis, on
Oct. %, 1858. Her maiden name was
Jane Melissa EggliSton, and her age
husband slXty-one. She alleged in her
complaint that her husband had been
guilty of adultery with one Ida john
son, alias Ida Schultz, also with some
unknown woman in the Davidson block
and another named Jennie Roberts, in
the town of Chaska. She claims that
he committed adultery at divers other
times and places with parties unknown
to her. She said that they, by their
tod cir .iap 40
acquired property of the value OF
$4,000, and that her husbands annual
income on his brick business is $4,000.
Yesterday Judge Simons issued an
order requiring Gregg to pay his wife
$50 per month, until further order of
the court, for living expenses, and 500
to defray the expenses of the action.
One of the causes of the complaint was
that Cir. gg was using much of the
money for presents to his lewd COM
paniOns.
ROUNDING UP THE TOUGHs.
Judge Brill yesterday began the trial
of criminal cases.
P. II. Berry pleaded guilty to drawing
check for S517 on the First National
bank and presenting it to the California
Wine House in payment of a bill of
goods. He was sentenced to one year
at hard labor in the state prison at Still
water.
John Svec withdrew his plea of not
guilty and pleaded guilty of petit lar
ceny. He was sentenced to ninety days
in the wOrkhouse.
Edward Mcdonald also changed his
plea and pleaded guilty of larceny. He
was sentenced to the WorkhouSe for six
ty days.
The case of James Marsh is now IN
progress. He is charged with entering
the residence of Mrs. Irene Jones, on st.
Anthony hill, and stealing an Overcoat
and watch valued in all at S75.
HER LOVE HAS COOLED.
Cecilia Zillner has brought suit
against John Zillner for divorce. They
were married July %, 1887, in st. Paul,
and at the time she was widow with
two children. She is thirty-four years
and Zlllner fifty-seven years of age.
She alleges cruelty, inhuman treatment,
habitual drunkenness and failure to
support.
NEW SUITS.
Robert P. Lewis has sued Margaret
L. Berryhill for certain rights and title
to lots and 6, section 80. township so,
range %. He asks that his right, title
and interest be determined and ad-
judged by the court.
A. j. More has sued Michael Daugh-
erty to recover $500 damages. More
claims that Daugherty entered his land
and cut away that amount in timber
wrongfully and converted it to his own
use.
Jason, Baker & Co. have brought suit
against q. +. Harrington for $1,000 on
two notes.
F. H. Sphinx & Co. have sued ]. E.
Graham for S93.57 for goods.
LEGAL BRIEFS.
The following is the call before Judge
Brill for to-day: Munger VS.. William
Erd; George E. Varnville VS.. CITY of st.
Paul; The Third National Bank of st.
Paul VS.. Marine Lumber Company ct
al; George M. Gould VS.. The City of
st. Paul; Hannah Hanley VS.. The City
of st. Paul.
Following is the call before Judge
Wilkin for to-day: Charles II. Robin
son ct al, VS.. Robert II. Depew ct al;
j. M. Ward Furniture and Stove COM
pany VS.. j. ii. Mailer company; George
E. Varnville VS.. The City of st. Paul.
Judge Brill entered an order yester-
day for Alex E. johnson, William p.
johnson, George W. Keeler, Edward j.
Kirkland and Thomas j. Kenney, to
show cause as to why they should not
be fined for non-appearance as jurors.
In the case of the Cigar Makers Pro-
tective Union No. SO VS.. M. Conhaim,
Bro. & Co., Judge SimonS entered an
order overruling demurrer to complaint.
with leave to defendant to file answer
within twenty DAYS after service.
In the case of Burns & Shaw VS.. G.
B. Lawton, Judge Simons yesterday is
sued Judgment for the sale of lot Z,
MerrilfS Encouragement of block 70,
West st. Paul, to satisfy a specific lien
created by the Judgment.
Attachments were issued yesterday
by Judge Brill for Thomas johnson,
David q. Klinefelter and George King,
for non-appearance as jurors.
The case of G. E. Lindsey VS.. J. A.
SanSome ct al, is on trial before Judge
Wilkin. 1t is an action to recover $500
on chattel mortgage.
A venire of hundred Jurors was re-
turned yesterday morning.
SUPREME COURT.
Three decisions were handed down by
the supreme court yesterday as follows:
In the matter of the application of o.
+. Green and j. E. Clark ct al, for the
appointment of receiver, appellants,
VS.. Charles q. Hillman ct al. respond
ents. The case involved a petition for
the appointment of receiver as pro-
vided by section 2, chapter 14S, General
Laws 1881, which states that by means
of an act or conveyance particularly
detailed, an alleged insolvent gave to
certain of his creditors preference
over other creditors, and that said act
was performed and conveyance made
for the purpose of giving such prefer
ence; and the petition being adequate
in other respects, is deemed sufficient.
The orGer was accordingly reversed by
Judge Hicks.
d. M. Osborne & Co., appellant, VS..
Margaret Doherty, respondent. In this
case the defendant executed and de.
hvered her own note to her husbands
creditor, upon an agreement (Which was