Wichita eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1886-1890, 1888-05-26
THE COURTS.
DISTRICT COURT.


Elias E. Wilson VS.. Jonathan Wilson
| dismissed at cost of the plaintiff.
Two divorce cases came up yesterday,
but the parties had evidently reconsidered
for both were dismissed at the cost of the
plaintiff. In the first, Susanah Wilson VS..
William r. Wilson, the defendant was al
legged TO have been guilty of abandonment,
drunkenness and abuse. In the other,
Addie Barker VS.. William Barker, the de
PENDANT was accused of extreme cruelty.
Sexton VS.. Chicago Lumber Co.; tenn
porary order of injunction granted
Brenton VS.. Brenton ct al: argued and
taken under Amusement.
The following cases were set for June
18th. Evans d Garner VS.. Alexandra w.
Robinson ct al, Mary I. Thilman VS.. John
T'hilman, Josie Hues VS.. Hittie Hues, VIM.
C. Dyer VS.. Chas. a. Dyer ct al, Chas.
Genninger vs.. Fritz Schmitzte, John II.
Lee & Co. VS.. /. NJ. Lynch, Morris j..
Lloyd vs.. James d. Muslin ct al, Morris
J. Lloyd vs. Geo L. McNeal ct al, Emma
Pollard VS. L. a. Pollard j. Renter & Co.,
J. NJ Lynch, /. NJ Reynolds & Co. VS.
same, the Rock Island Lumber g. Manu-
featuring Co. VS.. Frank r. Skinner ct al,
same VS.. Sam'l Haney ct al, p L..
Daugherty vs.. w. NJ. Berring ct al.
The following We're set for June Sth:
Edward j. Taylor VS.. Emma Farrow ct
al, B. Lombard Jr. VS. Eta +. Crow ct al,
Sue Robertson VS.. Alfonso Robertson.
Chicago Lumber company VS.. 5. 7. Jones
ct al.
The following were set for June o: Chi
cago Lumber company vs.. :. L. Jones ct
al, No. 566 20 81.
The following were set for the 18th: Chi
cago Lumber company vs.. 5. I. Jones ct
al, No. 572 to 517.
The following were set for the 18th: No
SIS, Chicago Lumber company VS.. s. 7.
Jones ct al; Thos j. Coulter ct al, vs.. c. c.
Turner ct al; jefferson Lumber company
vs.. 5. J. Tuttle: David 5. Field vs. Mary T,
Freeman ct al; Geo. c. Strong vs. f. NJ
Bonny ct al; Mary c. Keller vs.. w. +.
Walker.
POLICE COURT.
Three cases came up yesterday for viola
ton of the ordinance relative TO the taxing
of dogs. The cases against c. 4. Schu-
macher and r. L. Jacobs were withdrawn:
the one against John Redman was con-
tinued until 1890 on the 2Sth. ssEE
c r. Micah, G. c. Matte, J. +. Black
and A. Richardson were acquitted; the
Others paid S25 and costs.
ID. Granan, a drunk picked up on the
street, put up watch for the fine assessed
Leu Evans as the keeper of house OF
prostitution and Susie Smith, Lu Cole
and Jennie Wheeler as inmates turned
into the city treasury $50.
The trial of City vs.. Nanlandinoham for
running a gambling house on the West
Side came up yesterday afternoon. 1t was
into this place that Officer Smith a few
days since gained entrance by breaking
down two doors. The defendant was
found guilty az charged and fined S25 and
costs. Charges have been preferred against
Smith for breaking down the doors, his
trial viii come up this forenoon.
PROBATE COURT.
At the probate court yesterday proceed
ingS in aid of eNecutionfwers had in J. I.
Campbell vs.. y. D. Thurman. The hear
ing was commenced in the afternoon but
not being completed was continued over
until today.
JUSTICE COURT.
A warrant was yesterday issued from
Justice Walkers for the searching, of the
room of Miss Emma Arnot. ar No. 3l5 Elm
street The purpose of the warrant was
for the finding of a gold watch and chain
ana So in money belonging to A W. Al.
len. In the warrant he states that this
property was stolen by some person I'M
known TO him from room ~, No. l+S North
Market street. The reason that he sus-
poets the property 10 be concealed at No.
3l5 Elm street is thus stated: The person
who affiant suspects of stealing said prop
erty staid at said house, No. Si5 Elm street
with said Emma Arnot on the night of
May 18th. after leaving atlantis room on
same evening
\ warrant was also issued by J. H. Nc
CAL charging W. r. Arey With forging