New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1888-07-12

result is the same namely, sufficient to eat TO preserve
life and sufficient 10 wes to protect the body lHousd
debate, May 10. slias Hare. Democrat. Texas)
THE RIGHT TO BUY ANYWHERE
As an abstract question OF right, who IS there who
dares to say with his hand npon hs heart, looking
aIeSsSe right to bny What may ' need Or require
wherever can buy It Iaost cheaply' p Not one
limitations have all been cited IN your hearing by
this day. They are the supreme law: In them -
declared taxes shall DO uniform throughout ths
of Government ~ needs be- but not cent Tor tribute
beyond the revenue line, should be and Will be
campaign rallylng cry.-lHonse debate. May g. 1888.
charles IL Mansur Democrat, MissOurJ
A CANDID FREETRADER.
believe that tariff for protection f. the founda-
ton and principle of Ell tho complaints ard
resi- That has either threatened or actually disturbed
tho public peace and quiet for years, because Il fos
fers the labor and production Ot class and gives
n to another, thereby building up small class Il
great wealth and mpovcrishing the great body Of our
people am opposed TO any tariff whatever for pro-
lection simply. ] favor tariH thar Will bring
sufficient revenue 10 dcfay the expenses ~ the Cow
crnmcnt: and favor this because We must collect
tax sufficient 10 the actual wants OF tho Coz srn
ton. II We did not require money 10 dcfray ths
nncompromising observation-disclosures debate. Mar
10. 1888. ,ilas Hare. Democrat. Texas.
BARBARIc TARIFF LAW.
The protective system IS un-Amcrican and Is per-
version OF the laws Of nature, OF God and man VIC
find by the laws OF nature that some countries pro-
duce one article and others eve lllclebt NdtlcJp
and we ind that the oceans and rivers connect the-o
countries and. n were, highways OF COM
merce, created by nature, from ono country 10 an.
cline that they be exchanged for the prod-
ncts OF another and thus bless all mankind Bu1
he barbarc law nierfees and prevents the spirit OF
civilization and retards the tendency Of The age ~
the drawing together Of tho nations Of The earth
through the agencies Of commerce.-'Iiouso DEBATE
May 10, lsss, Edward Lane, Democrat lillnois''
A PREFERABLE VIEW OF PROTECTION.
Tie tariff for protection may be defined as tax on
duty laid upon all the 1000 articles specified IN mo
statute OF such amount viii prevent the domcs-
tic consumer from purchasing In the open markets 0f
the world. and will compel him TO buy Of the domesio
manufacturer az price equal 10 the real value OF mo
article with the tax or large portion Of H. added on.
Or IL may be said that n f. system BIZ which ths
Iaxing power Of nc ooyernment Is delivered over mo
The hands OF few men for the purpose 81 enabIinS
them TO lay tribute upon the rest O their fellow cit-
and under the transparent peicnce % saving ne
from alleged foreign monopoly. subjects the enre
population OF this country TO calling home monop-
oily. not only permitted, but knowingly and wilfulY
s snSaD oy ap Cannot devise ] aSao ap
more unjust. unreasonable, unfair and unrghteouS.
What demand Is the nalienablc right e
the greatest quantity OF the necessities OF He
House debate, April 26. 1855. John }. HemDhills
Democrat, South carolina)
BADGE OF INDUSTRIAL SLAVERY.
protective tariff that protects all our industries
and increases the wages Of our labores In uniform
and equal benefits would be its destruction and eNem.
pity its folly. l do not pretend
that the present bin for the reduction Of tariff taxes
manufactures OF iron, wool and cotton. / would
give the people 70 whom these necessity cteaper
prices. | would make free the farming implements,
tools and machinery with which the tlcs OF tho soil
flooding and clothing the world Chafiel slavery
has forever persisted in this land IT'S manacles aro
stricken of. Now strike down this industrial say-
cry and then will be free House debate, May 8.
1888, L. ". Moore, Democrat, Texas