St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-04-24
DOMESTIC DlsCORD.
Anders Mortensen Charges His
Wife With Infidelity and Wants
q niuoroa-I,e0alM MISCELLANY

q DiVOrce---LeSaI miscellany.
Anders Mortensen has commenced
suit against Lena Mortensen for di-
vorce. Their ages are forty-five and
thirty-eight respectively, and they were
married at Randolph, Wis, April 10,
1875. According to the bill of complaint
filed yesterday in the district court not
a single cloud of unhappineSs marred
the matrimonial bliss OF the pair until
June. 1887, when, Anders AYERS, he
smelled a rat of gigantic proportions.
AT that time it came to his notice that
Lena loved not wisely but two, the
other being gentleman bearing the
euphonious name of Ole Laren Jerm-
stad. Mortensen charges his wife with
infidelity, and claims that since he first
discovered that she was untrue to him
he has not cohabited with her. The
issue of the marriage were two children,
Emory, aged eleven years, and Arthur,
aged eight years. The plaintiff asks for
an absolute divorce and that he be
awarded the care and custody of the
children.
WANTS PLENTY OF PECUNIARY SALVE.
j. Schacherl has brought suit against
the st. Paul City Railway company
for damages. In his bill of complaint
he sets forth that Jan. 6, 1888, he was a
passenger on one of the East Seventh
street cars; that he demanded and re-
uueSted the driver to let him off at a
certain street, which the driver refused
and neglected to do, even after he had
pulled the bell-rope; that while he was
standing on the rear platform. which
was covered with ice and snow, the car
was started with jerk, throwing him
off, the fall injuring him severely and
breaking one of his legs. Judgment is
asked for in the sum of $1,000.
A BIG BATCH OF NEW SUITS.
Grunhagen & Frey have sued D. w.
Murphy & Co. to recover 1915 for goods
sold,
Finch, Van Slyck & Co. have sued ].
A. Olsen to recover S49O. Is for for mer-
chandise sold.
In the case of j. D. Morris against E.
M. Mcdonald and Samuel WisnOm, the
Jury returned verdict in favor OF the
plaintiff for 1868.
Stewart & Sehusler have sued Henry
Weyl and j. d. Ramaley to recover
S2O2.O6 ON note.
Charles II. Barron has sued S. W. &
&. III. Clark to recover $57.75 on note.
E.P. Wilgus has brought snit against
FL. Mollers ct al. to quiet title to certain
property in Rice & Irvine's addition.
He also asks Judgment in the sum of
S100.
Peter De Smet has sued Andrew
Schletz to recover $3SS.0S for labor per-
formed.
Lauer & Bros. have sued John Jeremy
to recover Sl79.17 for goods sold.
Henry Benedict & Co. and Charles
L. nd I,,1
son Parker to recover 800 on a note.
Joseph Haag has sued FerrodOwell &
Son to recover ST. 40 for goods sold.
Mary Bellamy ct al. have brought suit
against Samuel G. Staples ct al. to es-
tablish title to certain property in Ban
ming q DIVERS addition.
RESTS WITH THE JURY.
The Osborne poisoning case, which
has attracted so much attention. was
concluded yesterday afternoon, the jury
returning about o'clock. The defense
rested after calling DrS. ShilnOnek,
Stone, Hutchinson, Markoe, Dorion and
II. d. De Wallace. In rebuttal for the
plaintiff the following testified: II. D.
DE Wallace, Della Osborne, Mr.. Mills
and DR.. Glidden.
MISCELLANY.
q. Lindberg was examined for inSan-
ity before Judge German and sent to
Rochester.
The cases before Judge Simons to-
morrow are numbers 1913 and Ill.
Thecase of Emma Meyer against The
City of St. Paul, being an action for
damages, is On trial before Judge Will
kin.
Juries have been drawn for the dam
age cases of Fannie A. Steele, Emma L.
Thorsen. and Frederick A. Siemens
against the st. Paul City Railway COM
pany.
The case of The State of Minnesota
against Charles Netterfield, charged
with stealing a horse, has been cOntin-
ued until May 5. Several conflicting
bounty claims in this case will be set
tied at that time.
SUPREME COURT.
The following cases were argued and
submitted in the supreme court yester-
day;
Alice B. Fife. respondent, VS.. John D.
Blake ct A.. appellant.
Anton Knobianch, appellant, Us. Abbie
Crossman and Elizabeth Il. Foglesang.
respondents.
Anton Knoblanch. appellant, vs. Elizabeth
d. Foglesang ct al. RESPONDENTS.
a Blaze in Pocket.
An unusual spectacle, that of walk
ing fire, was witnessed on Third street
yesterday afternoon, when that thor
oughfare was crowded with pedestrians.
A laboring man. judging from his garb,
was hlHrying up the, street intent upon