Sacramento daily record-union., 1888-10-13


Motions.
Examination of class OF applicants.
TUESDAY, November Is, 1855.
2O,479-Hoftman vs. Superior Court of San Fran
cisco.
%, is3 People VS.. Lee Chuck.
20 4S5-PeOple VS.. stephens.
12,546-Blue Lake Water Co. VS.. Mitchell.
1l542-People VS.. Rockh0ld ct al.
l2,Hl-Greenleaf VS.. Stockton C. q. and A
Works.
127g0-Pacifc Mutual Life Insurance Company
VS.. Shepardson ct al.
Eastwood VS. Pendola.
l2665-Antholy ct al VS.. Jillson ct al
l2,795-WhittaBer VS.. Pendola.
20,iS6-People VS.. Henderson.
WEDNESDAY. November IA. ISSs.
12,73l-Cleland vs. Walbridge
12,23I-ln re. Allen, an insolyent debtor.
12,'26-Gale VS.. Best ct al.
l2,351-Farnum VS.. Hefner.
12,434-Welsh VS.. Gould.
12,504-COnradt vs. Hill
- 2505-Turner administrator VS.. Turner ct al
Il, 2,554-Hanson vs. Fricker
12,60S-COwan VS.. Phoenix Insurance COMPANY
12,62o-Perkins VS.. Brock ct al.
THURSDAY, November Is, 1885.
12.720-Tapia VS.. Demartini ct al
2,7SS-n ilson VS. Devine.
ia -Harnett eJ al VS.. c. p. K. R. Co
12,il3-ln re. Good ct al, III insolvency.
l2,4l5-Staples vs. Connor.
II, 53l-Gates vs. Carquinez Packing Company
12,555-Flre VS.. Stefan ct al.
l2,I93-tagan VS.. Carty.
12,5lS-Pehrson VS.. Hewitt ct al
II, 2,6i6-SOuter rs. Mcclure ct al.
FRIDAY, November IG, 1885.
l2,7l9-Bedell VS.. Herring.
12,6O1-Daly VS. Dunn.
Il, ,633-StaDdaIt VS.. Round Valley Water On
l2,i50-Dreyiuss ct al. VS. Giles ct al
IL, 022-Taylor VS.. North Star Gold Mining Co.
12.57S-McShane VS.. Carter ct al.
l2,6l9-Iurner VS.. White ct al.
l2,55s-Sulliyan VS.. Grass Valley Quartz N. anf
~ W
u 74O--Ah Fong vs. Stenes.
II, 'S9-Penrose VS.. Celkins,
SATURDAY, November Il, 1888.
II, ,S99-Wilson VS.. Atkinson.
l2,215-Wheeler ct al. VS.. West et al
l2,399-Bewick ct al. VS.. Muir ct 81.
12,420-Grennon VS.. NcGregor ct al.
II, l2,f37-Bewick ct al. vs. Muir ct al.
l2,5i5-LaWrence VS.. Gsyetty et al
l2,660-Fagundes II, VS.. G. z. K. Il. Co.
lZ,lo5-Hausmen VS.. HausliDg.
l2,Sl2-Alte Silver MO-. VS.. Alta Placer ". Co
ct al
u. 2.S14-White ct al vs.. Lee ct al
l2,slb-Casement, estate of
l2,SSl-Loring VS.. Stuart.
MONDAY November 10, 1883
l2,2l2-Moulton ct al. VS.. Knapp ct al.
l2,552-Dale VS.. Puryis.
l2,592-Bailey VS.. Fox.
12,654-Oullahsn VS.. Sweeney
l2'S61-Bollinger Y ct al vs.. Manning ct al
12,s7o-Hanscom VS.. Drullard.
l2,l41-Hiobard vs. Howell
12.511-Eversden VS.. Mayhew
12,553-McClnre ct al. VS.. C0lyear et al
l2,261-Sillcox ct al. VS.. Lang ct al
TUESDAY, November 20, 1855.
l2,5.g-Sears ct al; vs.. starbird ct al.
l2,451-Bacon VS.. Diyoll ct al
II, 2,400-People VS.. Eichelroth
II, 2,i95-Oneto VS.. Restano.
l2,55S-Symons VS.. Bunneil ct al
Il, ,599-Smith VS.. Smith
12,632-McCormick vs. sutton
l2,6tS-McCormick vs. Sutton
12,b1l-WenZeil Us. schulz el al
l2,69S-Curtin VS.. Phoenix Insurance COMPANY.
l2,SoJ-Howes VS.. Abbott.
WEDNESDAY, November q, 1888.
u, ,s59-Pcreria VS.. Smith
Il, ,SGS-McElry VS.. Erickson. adm, etc.
II, ,l3S-Luco VS.. Superior Court
12,2Si-Adams ct al. VS. LambaTti.
u, 2,S9S-Pe0ple VS.. O'Keefe.
Il, i1i-People vs. Davidson
i, 453- Pekin NJ and NJ Co. VS.. Kennedy OF al
l2,196-Southwick y, VS.. Davis c. al
L, ,2sS-Gounty of Yuba VS. Cleke, adm, etc.
vs. Benninger.
THURSDAY, November y, 1883.
12,255-Estate of Fowler
l.. e.577-NcCormick VS.. North British Insurance.
Co., etc.
I, 2,sll-Wrlght W. Roseberry ct al
l2,slS-CowaTd VS.. Canton
l2.S3i-County of Yolo vs. Barney.
L, ;;,,59-xan Cieave VS.. Bucher Jas Sheriff.
II, ,s6l-Wade VS.. Gloster
l., ,S3l-Reese VS.. Thornton,
u. o-52-Der evan VS.. MctSlean
II, $50 Brien VS.. Newman
FRIDAY November d. 1888.
Il l2,4il-Peregoy ct al. VS.. Selliek.
le,4s2-Peregoy ct al. VS.. McKissick
y. 2.io9-hnoeh. administrator, VS.. Bunnell.
vs.. Gardner er al
i2,771-Sharp VS.. HofTmon ct al
l2656-Moran ct al, VS.. Ferris.
12657-Moran ct al. VS.. Farley
IL, ,65S-Moran et al VS.. Ross
l., ,696-MoEan Bros vs., Farley.
l., ,677-Moran Bros VS.. Ross.
II, st0-lrel1 ain VS.. Barney ct al.
SATURDAY, November u. 1883.
Il. l2.5S3-Breekenridge VS.. Croker.
VS.. Lovdall.
l., 12,5Oo-WeyaDt IS. Murphy et al.
L, ,523-Hili VS.. Miller.
j 12,572-Cardweil VS.. County OF Sacramento ct al.
l2,6l5-Fenton vs. Alsip ct al
l2,62 -Msinrich ct al. ys. Johnston.
l2.6I3-Hill VS.. Miller.
Il, -Washburn vs. Huntington. Hophins a.
y, 2,eS2-CsIlahan vs. Dunn, Controller.
L, ,Ss2-Glide vs.. DEyer ct al.
MONDAY, November a6, 1883
y, 2,754-Mauldin VS. CLARK et al
II, ,762--Doland vs. Mooney ct al
L, ,S35-Byam IS. eastman ct al
II, ,09o-Hoult ct al. VS.. Baldwin.
Il, 2,207-Finney vs. Curtis
L, 2,2i4-Lesrned ct al VS.. Castle.
L, 2,Si2-Hntson W. Woodbridge Protection Dis
trict No. !.
z, ,io6- anderson vs. California Steam Naviga-
tion Company.
2, ,45S-Burkett VS.. 2uzkett
I2,41l-Baser ct al. VS.. Ducker ct al
TU sDAY, November ~ 1883
Z, 2,692-%iihnit et al. vs. Bryant ct al
= 2'flt-swaln " Stockton Savings and Loan So
z, 2,so2-Shsrp IS Blankeaship
2,se''-bek ser e. al vs.. firenien's Fund Insur-
2.Sst-Sippson Ct nj. vs. Mcisaf.y
:. 2.e6j-Pool vs.. Clifford ct al
:, 2,sdl-smith Ys. Kcsgle Tax ccll.esor)