The Stark County Democrat. [volume] (Canton, Ohio) 1833-1912, 1888-11-22
begal Notices,
Legal Notice.



Mary Oondy et al, Defendants
MARY Condy, tho unknown hulta Of Mary Oondy,
Ann Csnay, nn unknown heirs Of Ann uondy, Fred
efi0k n, Poet tho unknown heirs Of ffedbflek =,
ucl Hitchcock, James Patterson, the unknown heirs
OF James Patterson, James. Duncan tho unknown
hrtrt Of james Duncan, viii take notice that on the
t1th day Of uotobob llVpi he plhlnul nled hA Pc
lllOn against tho above named defendants and oths
90 In the once VI fhe Clerk OF Common Pleas Court
of hlArk county, ohio, huunig form that he "a No
owner In foo VI lot No, one a., ~ shown on the plat
Of The village VI Navarro, ~ said county Of stark
Alao that Tho parties under whom 10 claims have
bean the owners OF AAid premises IN fec simple oons
dpnuouAly alnee April 9blh. 1901, that on February
Tth, 1914, aAld lot was conveyed W Jonathan pondy,
eDat nereAiteI while tho owner Of aAld 10Y said
Jonathan C0ndy died, leaving Mary pohdy and Ann
Cpndy his only huifH ~ lAwI upt said Ann and MARY
Obnd, April gnlh, ilil, executed and delivered "
ihano nOhhAll llrfr doods ot qult-olalm conveying ~
wtra never hird with tho Recorder Of said county,
NOT recorded, leaving y link ~ the chain OF the ute
70 nud promises that thereafter tnid lot was owned
Ia Zoe by Isaac nontlll that ho conveyed, tho SAINT
VI JAMES duncan, who IN turn conveyed tho Ahinc "
Richard Gee, hut by the neglect OF tho SAID Goo MS
aald deed Wa NJ no time put on no feeofda ot STARR
county, leaving another llnR m the chain Of said title
N said lot SAID petition further foelles the several
grAntou and grantees Of tho aAld lot through. whom
recitcs that all Of said parties have held open, noto.
rlOnn and undlApuled possession Of said premises
from 1901 and Until No nllna o nus pelltonl also
that while Henry urlbel, (unn Of tho paftleA through
whom plaintiff claims was tho owner OF said 10th he
executed y mortgage deed OF tho same W Samuel
Hitchcock and Ffederlok n, Feet 10 secure the pay
mont VI one thousand dollars, that said mortgage
was Aftorward paid by said Oflhel aud was satisfied
And discharged, but that no record ot such %aAtlafac.
tion and discharge wah ever made on The mortgage
record OF stark county tho petition further rocltoa
that while William Kline, another one " the parties
through whom plaintiff claims, vast tho owner OF said
lot. he executed pretended mortgage of tc tano
10 James Patterson, pretending 20 secure tho ray
mont OF ol,ufl,Ou, that said mortgage was dated
May e.. 1870, ana was duo September 1870 hat the
SAME WIS false and fraudulent and was intended W
hinder and delay the creditors from collecting their
iunt clalmai thht said mortgage was without any
consideration whatever, Tho petition nrayu that the
plaintiff may be- dcoroOd 10 DO The sole Owiur " said
lot free from any interest therein u any or al tho
defendants named IN said petition, That Mary COndy
aud Ann uondY or their unknown helfA aud James
Duncan, Win hih unknown helfg, 10 ordered and de-
creed 20 convey 70 tho plaintiff all their lnteresla IN
within o day named, that tho dooroo Of this Court
may operate ~ such conveyance OF said lot, that the
defendants aud their unknown heirs .bn forever en-
Joined from claiming any right or ttloto said prcm'
lAea, that the said mortgage from Henry urlhol 10
Frederick n, Poet and Samuel Hitchcock DO found
10 bO fully paid and he dpcrcod cancelled on the
record and discharged, that tho mortgage from
william Kline 10 James Patterson DO declared false
aud fraudulent without consideration, anl DO or
dered cancelled on the rotordl that all clouds on The
plalntln'a title, aH IN said petition more fully vol
forth, may DO removed, ana. no bo gulotcd IN Tho
same and for al proper rcllof 10 which no N entitled
20 IN the promises,
Said petition viii DO for hearing on aud after tho
D0th day OF November, lHtl.
Oot0ber 10Th, 1874 -iHstw