The Daily bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Hawaii]) 1882-1895, 1888-10-30

of desertion. Granted. A. Rosa
for plaintiff.
FRIDAY, Oct. 26th.
The King VS.. Tones and Kodani.
Gaming, Defendants appeal from
Pslice Court, Honolulu. New trial,
the jury having disagreed at July
term last. Being tried before a
foreign jury. Attorney G eneral, G..
w. Ashford for the crown j. H..
Kaulukou for the defendants.
The King VS.. Tomis ct al, Gam
ing. Before foreign jury. Verdict
of not guilty.
L. Ahung VS.. Ng San Kee. AS
sumpsit. Clerks certificate of de-
fault of defendant to answer being
filed, judgment is ordered entered.
Kanaloa ct al. VS.. Union Mill Co.
ct al. Ejectment. Plaintiffs mo-
ton for new trial overruled and ex-
ceptions noted to ruling. w. G..
Achi for plaintiff; w. o. Smith and
A. Rosa for defendants.
Kahelemauna (k.) VS.. Keamalu
(k.). Replevin. Plaintiffs motion
for u new trial overruled and exccp-
tions taken to the ruling. S. X.
Kane for plaintiff; A. Rosa for de-
PENDANT.
AT HAMBERs-BEFoRE BiCKEGroM
Castle & Cooke VS.. w. O. Smith.
Bill in equity for specific perform.
ance, praying that defendant, as
signee in bankruptcy of A. f. Cooke,
endorse over to plaintiffs certain
shares of stock in the Haiku Sugar
Co. pledged to them as security
for $4,000. In former replevin
suit at law, the defendant, beng
then the plaintiff, recovered judg-
ment in his favor for the possession
of said shares, which were not en-
dorsed by the bankrupt, said A. F.,
Cooke. The question involved in
this case is one unprecedented in
this Court, as to whether or not a
specific performance will lie against
an assignee in bankruptcy. After
arguments the case was submitted.
w. r. Castle for plaintiff; w. o.
Smith and Gardner Wilder for de
PENDANT.
SATURDAY, Oct. 9th.
VIM. Chas. Achi VS.. Isabella
Achi. Plaintiffs motion for disoon-
tinuance is allowed. A. Rosa for
plaintiff; no appearance of or for
defendant.
Avail (Ch.) VS.. Mary Ana. Di-
vorce. Divorce granted for adul-
terry of defendant. S. X. Kane for
for plaintiff; defendant per Sc.
Annie Harrigan V; George Harri-
gan. Divorce. Divorce granted
for habitual intcmpcrance of defend
ant, and the order of Mr.. Justice
Preston Of Sept. s, that defendant
pay MIR. Rosa for attorneys fee:
and costs, stands. A. Rosa fol
plaintiff; defendant per Sc,
Ellen Davis VS.. Daniel Davis
Divorce. by agreement of counse
continued TO next term. A. Ros
for plaintiff; j. l.. Karlukou for de
PENDANT.
j. S. Martin vs.. L. B. Kerr
Trespass. Defendant motion Oct
oath for new trial. Defendant
bill of exceptions is allowed. g
w. Ashford for plaintiff; A. S
Hartwell for defendant.
l.. Ahlo VS.. VIM. Hensy ant
Henry r. Macfarlane. Assumpsit
note 1915 and interest. Clerk
certificate of failure of defendant
Macfarlane to answer being pre-
sented and filed, the Court orders
judgment entered for default. V
V. Ashford for plaintiff no appear
ance of or for defendant.
The King VS.. Pang Yuen Char
Conspiracy, second degree. De
PENDANTS motion for arrest of judg
ment overruled and exceptions noted
Sentenced to three months imprison
ment at hard labor without costs O
Court. c. w. Ashford, Attorney
General for the crown; w. A. Whit
ing for the defendant.
Maria Hageman VS.. Harry Hage
man. Divorce. Petition for di
yorce heard and divorce granted 70
extreme cruelty and failure to pro
vide of defendant. Defendant ais
ordered 10 pay to the Clerk, b,
Saturday noon next, $50 fer cost
or be fined for contempt. p. Neu
mann for plaintiff; defendant pc
sc.
Kaalemauna Wv. } vs.. Alika Ok.
Case being called and plaintiff nc
being ready it is ordered discon
tinued unless plaintiff pay to de
PENDANT on or before Saturday mex
$25, when it shall be continued t
the January term, S. X. Kane TO
plaintiff A. Rosa Tor defendant.
Kala w. VS.. Kapuiki (k,) hi
vorce. Divorce granted for extrem
cruelty of defendant, he to pa
costs. A. S. lIortweil for plaintiff
w. q. Achi for defendant.
Failing to be heard or fihishe
this term, the following cases ar
ordered continued TO next term