The Mankato free press. [volume] (Mankato, Blue Earth County, Minn.) 1879-1924, 1888-05-11
DISTRICT COURT.
The Completed Calendar of Cases
for the May Term.


The May term of the district-court
opens next Tuesday, though the petit
jury is not summoned to appear until
Wednesday. The calendar contains
eight criminal and thirty-seven evil
cases, against five and forty-four last De-
| cember. The session promises to be
quite lengthy one, as several will cases
are to be tried. The grand jury will
have a number of cases to investigate
The calendar was completed to-day by
Clerk of Court Thorne, and is as follows:
CRIMINAL CALENDAR.
/. State of Minnesota VS.. Fred Doc
little, Respt., and Albert Macbeth,
Applt.
2. State of Minnesota VS.. Joseph Sill
| YER.
3. State of Minnesota VS.. Eliza Silver.
4. State of Minnesota Respt., vs.. Andy
Jones, Applt.
5. State of Minnesota Respt., VS..
Samuel A. Cookson, Applt.
6. State of Minnesota VS.. John Riley.
7. State of Minnesota vs.. William Lit
tie and John Delgen, Complt., and
Applt.
er and Charles Kruger, Complt., and
Applt.
CIVIL CALENDAR.
l. Leman Pratt vs.. Helen Porter and
John Porter.
2. John Cream VS.. Marian Hills.
3. John Perry vs.. w. b. craig and Il.
S. Mccormick, co-partners as w. b.
Craig q Co.
4. Oliver Burgess by Miranda Burgess
his guardian ad Item vs.. The Winona &
| St. Peter Railroad Co.
| 5. Anton Magel vs.. Mando Henlein.
6. The Plymouth Clothing House vs..
Aaron Henlein and l.. Henlein.
| z. Catherine Wagon, Applt., vs.. Chas.
Wagon, Jr., Jacob Wagon and Emma
Harke, Respts.
s. George Wagon, Applt., vs. Charles
! Wagon, Jr., Jacob Wagon and Emma
Harke, Respts. -
9. Herman Wagon, Applt., vs.. Chas.
Wagon, Jr., Jacob Wagon and Emma
Harke, Respts.
10. Martha M. Franchere VS.. Samuel
IA. Cookson.
IL. Alice Cole vs.. Samuel A. Cookson.
II. Charles Roos, Respt., VS.. Mary
Casey, Applt.
IL. J. P. Christensen and Mary Casey
Applt., VS.. Charles Roos, Respt.
IA. G. s. Leeds & Co., vs.. J. Flachsen-
har. L. Patterson and w. G. Hoerr.
| Is. j. p. Christensen, as executor OF
the estate of William Young, deceased
Applt., vs.. Christian Roos and Charles
Roos, Respts.
16. Mary Casey, Applt., vs.. Christian
Roos and Charles Roos, Respts.
II. Mary Casey and ]. p. Christen.
sen, as executor of the last will of Viii.
liam Young, deceased, Applts., VS.
Christian Roos and Charles Roos
Respts.
Is. W. w. P. Mcconnell vs.. Peter
Lloyd.
10. Jonas Boyer VS.. William Johnson
20. Charlotte Lockerby VS.. Samue
Lockerby.
Fl. BIT. Hutchinson VS.. The Chicago
st. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway
Company.
%. Evan Goodrich VS.. Mary Good
rich.
%. Jacob Pfenninger vs.. George
scherer, Margaretta Scherer and Christ
Scherer.
"a. Henry Winicke and Henry Doerr
partners as Winicke & Doerr, VS.. l.. 7
Grady, John Mahan and Thomas Mahan
partners as Grady, Mahan q Co.
25. John Smithson, Applt., vs. Oscar
Thompson, Respt.
26. S. ID. GAYLORD vs. James Thomp
son, Frances +. Thompson, William
Thompson, Gaylord Lamb and jaime.
Boyliss.
n. Frances f. Thompson vs. c. III
Piper, Henry Shaubut, Eliphalet Smith
and q. b. Frazer.
90. Perry Zimmerman VS.. The Chica
60, Milwaukee Il st. Paul Railway Com
pany.
20. Anton Magin vs.. Marcellus III
Pitts and Florison ID. Pitts, partner
heretofore doing business under tn,
name of ii. A. Pitts Sons, Gaylord Laml
and G. H. Piper.
30. LOUIS Wallace vs.. w. B. Craig ant
r. L. Mccormick, partners under tn,
firm name of w. b. Craig q Co.
81. Jacob Miller vs.. Chicago, st. Pau
d Omaha Railway Co.
80. Elinor Jones vs.. Chicago, st. Pau
& Omaha Railway Co.
30. Fuller, johnson & Co., vs.. Charlie
w. Herman ct al.
"a. VIM. r. Thompson, Jr., vs. G. II
Piper.
IS. William Kleeman vs. RobeI
Witte and William White.
36. Chester X. Smith vs. Archibald
J ID. Crane.
: 81. j. E. Rowland and Timoth
Reese, co-partners as Rowland d Reese
Applts., VS.. John F. Klatt and Charlie
L. Klatt, Respts.