The Daily bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Hawaii]) 1882-1895, 1888-10-02

lC personally uOlllleu VI Ilt Nuy |
when they will be required to be in
attendance. The foreign jurors
will be personally notified likewise,
They will not he required the first |
week of the term.
Following is the calendar:
HAWAIIAN JURY
The King VS.. Haawinaaupo sell
ing liquor. Achi for defendant.
The King vs.. Molteno; selling
liquor. Kaulukou for defendant.
The King VS.. Timoteo and 8 9TH
ers; conspiracy.
Nakuina VS.. Achi damage. Smith
for plaintiff; defendant in person.
Keohokii VS.. Palahu; ejectment.
Kane for plaintiff.
Holokahiki VS.. Mikaleml eject
ment. Holokahiki and Kane for
plaintiff; Poepoe for defendant.
Kuanalewa VS.. Kipi; ejectment.
Brown for plaintiff; Smith for de-
PENDANT.
Kahelcmauna VS.. keamalu; re-
plevin. Kane for plaintiff; Rosa
for defendant.
Kalauloa VS.. Kekukahiko; eject
ment. Kane for plaintiff.
The King vs.. Kahele; sxtortion.
Kaulukou for defendant.
MIXED JURY.
Kanaloa VS.. Union Mill CO.. );
etectment. Achi for plaintiff;
Smith and Rosa for defendant.
Meleana VS.. Laupahoehoe Sugar
Co.. ejectment. Smith Tor plain
tiff.
Minister of Interior VS.. Keau; as
sumpsit.
Kahananui VS.. Ashford; Grim.
con. Rosa for plaintiff; Creighton
for defendant.
Kanakanui VS.. Leslie; assumpsit.
Smith and Achi for plaintiff; Hatch
for defendant.
Kekai VS.. YIN Quon; ejectment.
Achi for plaintiff; Ashford & Ash
ford for defendant.
Makee Sugar Co. vs.. Keaumiki;
eiectment. Smith for plaintiff.
Keau VS.. Lopez; ejectment. Achi
for plaintiff.
Trustees Bishop Estate VS.. Kala !;
eiectment. Hatch for plaintiff.
Kilikina VS.. All Pow; ejectment.
Ashford & Ashford for plaintiff.
Joliva VS.. Kaulukou; assumpsit.
Whiting for plaintiff; Rosa for de-
PENDANT.
Bowler VS.. EkaIesia Kaumaka-
pill: action on contract. Creighton
for plaintiff.
FOREIGN JURY.
The King VS.. All Sui & Young
Hong: possession of opium. Cas-
tie for defendant.
The King VS.. All Sau; possession
of opium. Kaulukou for defend
ant.
The King VS.. Rego; fornication.
| Ashford for defendant.
The King vs.. Qui Min Ing; sell
ing liquor. Hartwell and Kaulukou
for defendant.
The King VS.. Camacho; man
slaughter. Hartwell for defendant.
The King VS.. All Sun; perverting
justice.
The King VS.. Marden; assault
and battery. Rosa for defendant.
The King VS.. All Wing; disor-
derby house.
The King VS.. All Gung & All Lai
gambling. Rosa for defendant.
The King vs.. Pang 1ung CHA
conspiracy.
Gay VS.. Mendonca covenant.
Hartwell for plaintiff; Hatch fol
defendant.
Martin VS.. Kerr; trespass. Ash
ford & Ashford for plaintiff; Hart
well for defendant.
Barry VS.. McCully; assumpsit
Rosa for plaintiff; Peterson for de
PENDANT.
Crawford VS.. Briggs; assumpsit
Kinney for plaintiff.
Congdon VS.. Ackermann; tres
pass. Ashford & Ashford for plain
tiff; Hartwell and Hatch for de
PENDANT.
Ahlo VS.. Henry; assumpsit. Ash
ford & Ashford for plaintiff
Thompson for defendant.
Ahung VS.. Ng Sau Kee; assump
sit. Ashford & Ashford for plain
tiff Rosa for defendant.
Macfarlane vs.. McCandless; as
sumpsit. Kinney for plaintiff; Ash
ford & Ashford for defendant.
Reeve VS.. Puuloa Sheep and S
Ranch Co. ; assumpsit. Creighto
for plaintiff.
Peacock VS.. d'Abreu; assumpsit
Whiting for plaintiff; Ashford
Ashford for defendant.
Parke VS.. Peacock trOver. Brow
for plaintiff; Whiting for defendant
McChesney VS.. Cartwright; as
sumpsit. Hartwell for plaintiff
Hatch for defendant.
Makee Sugar Co. VS.. Aloiau
eiectment. Smith for defendant.
Makee Sugar Co. VS.. All | /; eject
ment Smith for plaintiff.
Martin VS.. Kerr; assumpsit. Ash
ford & Ashford for plaintiff; Hart
well for defendant.
81 I -