New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1888-01-10
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
= srArrs RIGHTS OPINION GIVEN.
VALIDITY OF A CLAUSE IN TIM San po"'NoAS
EXTRAORDINARILY Aew.

80, - -. ,,s,..A ss.srs e. Say IN uss hsbsss ecrpus
case Of the Mayer CITY couaen Of the oa'y a eo'
Nce who are now in the custody OF tne on'ea $3.50 VAT .
Aha, hcre for contempt Of ~ order OF inc une se@e' ~
.ut Court Tas court hsads that 0ssssd states Cr'
cuu Court sitting court OF sqnV Ma no 1unsooien
over casss involving the appoint
man, mr. renovai Of state snd u1icipsi sces The pro-
s =, ,,,x rsserst Court IN Ncersska therefore wste.
60 ~. scs,npi,e In ustnre . usurpssisn NJ The
e,c,.ns of beyond its jur'sdsssen and we're
null AMI voa detention Of the Mayor and the City
Tounc Of Lincoln custody 10 illegal and they are entitled
to discharge "a. -. q. ...-.- .
whitney md others sgsus, william A. Rooertson. Colec
TOR NewycrE The question pres>stedm the
force asd scope OF provssns contained In treaties
concluded United and the Republic OF
Son Domingo and The Kingdom OF avail respectively The
paius error who ncrohauts OF New York CITY la
ported 1882 IRON saa Domingo large qu,atiy Of cen.
Aad noasses sugars similar In klnd to the sugars
imported OF duty the Sandwich Isanla The Col
exactsa duties the san Domingo sugars 10 the
amount $ssO importers paid undef protest. anu
thsu brought this the money On the sround
that sugars controversy were i"psred foe OF
duty Islands under treaty pfoviSoas
therefore contcndei they should be a"'e" Tree o'
AMY from the Isan OF Domingo uader like treaty
visions Judgment OF the Court in favor oil the Collector
isanrhnef
against Edward Holden Collector which presents nearly
the SANE question:
decision rendered in the patent case Of Beh
amn Dreyius against sophia seas exscntrr Appeal fron
This was alleged infringement OF patent granted
July 1862 John seirlA The rcmsnded. with
sdirection to dismiss the bill
decision also the patent Of Aired b.
Lawther against Charles Hamilton and T. W. Goodrich.
Appai from the Court fer the Eastern
Tss sas f4 0f s 'fss e
La siSsi for 40 improved Of treating Oeasnous
decision was rendered postmastsrs salary case Of
Was. This Was suit for writ Of
af H. In
ys ne sc Of July lset sp s ~ sse sSa MaTsh
nnorsndng ana csnstruotono of tho statutes and hots
that . OH 81 1S S oS. ne
years TIE Judgment Of the sarene Court OF the District
The Ssi1 %orass snsta as Missouri Submitted
f Gos. sa s1S' si 'S
PRIZE. TIL maintain , u h., = the case GSs
not rsaara and s iss , @
tie cass does present feera Questions a. the m'aon 70
ffaance PRONOUNCED by the stats
court
The other business transacted today was follows
o9 ps pyGG apaS int 1f T ae, M Sr
s APEfs 6sfSI Of Now YORK Decree ame
No ~ Emory Norton a.sgnse ee appellants s. mt
Tilted The Eastern District of Louisiana Decree
100 Henry Roberts, and other, r. at Henry
States nf Sl ho Nuncrn b.Tct t Of Judgment
srmed With eoss and interest 20 so q, william Horton
o N ~ sr att +
re S 6S of ' EHS% S'ss S5 S @
e%se re~an Win reSSns to grant psT Rufus
SSs b. g1IST 1p S, SSH geut WITH
ana cause remanded with directions to grant new
30 lle. Cornelius GumbeL plan,id in error agt John
10 the circuit Court Of United states foI tho Easern
DT VAN upon the facts found in the
cN sT ss opn sTOG 81 S count
10 lS Mary n ~ Boz Sy her neA or enH ca rom me-
Csaft Of he United states western District
Of louisiana Decree armed VIII G9sts cror act urr
States for southern District Of New-York Judgment
b. sos III Sas ct al Inc
TN led states Southern Dsrlcl OF New-York De-
red Rs6ar: apgslsn, ss BROOKE y Maoha
ba Decree reversed with costs and cause em"nded with
Charlie. Bs's plaintiff I10r r. +. agi rc The
Court United States the District of Kansas Judgment
q s ns4cgs ag sa 5SeG IT
ne 60 S'f, so 81 hnrcny isnsdSa
s,s : S hs DsTst Of Judgment
The 1 N1n sn ~ s sSpf' the asa
'Wo l9s Robert N LAWSON executor ETC. appellant ag
&C. F S Apea ws. v S
ys s sDo sso 81 an aH
Cur. aad % render decree accordingly ruo.,u,on,
company S Li @G rsiSs IN sreP haghes IL
c s9 1S s,s% ssSs VIII
II 70; saa ai Hs''se Sa'
70 The rsai C9oa GnItsd i'd, states tate. Tor the
1s inland and sapG9rd GG 10 Ts . mp sy
preme Court Of the District Of coumT judgment reversed
Win cost, and cause a. Sts .r sn Inc motion
CT The defendant for new trial based on N. ground 'hAhe
vrsRAs aas GssIsa Ea
cS@Paoy ofdiTsd that The ~r, miles.
NE panr IN error snow cause 10 the Vi "a
and 81 the u
Church Ordered mat orier dismissal be amended
at TIE Mercantile National Bank etc. Notion TO ADVANCE
granted and cause set down for argument next ae NO wv
No sg5' The Western Telegraph Company appe
granted and cause assigned Tor argument next ae
Ga oss The State d North Carolina aaa others appel
' 1:s r' Ait lately ai.s
ssne Gr s .S St cs IS acG in It's order
u e'S S siS PspiH E'S
MsrehaaS plaintiff error ag JG.sgn
inc A Livandas Motion to dismiss denied without pfeu
10 l21-The City OF La plaintiff in error,
no ii22-The City Of Shreveport, La plaintiff in error
cy ~, a D Ssn,sa in error
The Chief announced that tho court would take
recess from February 90 to March 10, next
No 49-The United states appellant agt Jung All Lung
No G57"The United States. appellant ast John Bond
2io-The southern Development Company of Nevada,
appellant ag Frank ls SEIZE ys NaEniaet%pg Company Linn
ited plaintiff IA error. agt Elizabcth l. Hyatt Motion 10
affirm suOmitoL
40 Ills The National Bank OF Springfield plain
m : so X. I:r.dn R9f Racssr pnnta in
rome H. Wheeler. Submitted. ~. ,,. ..
No 1876 Russell sage appellant agt the memphis anu
Little Rock Railroad Company cas- reorg aDLedl -, ~
No l27 Tho Memphis aud Little Rock Railroad Cohi-
psny appellant Russell sage Argument continon'
The Memphis and Little Rock Raroad ompaIV.
others trustee- Appear from the
Ircn United States for the Eastern Dstrc OF
Arkansas OF Wager Swayne for appellant ds'
missed with costs. ..uo,,.
agt the Memphis Little Rock Railroad Company ae
10 esq L +. Brown and Others appellants agL g. T.
Mcdonnell v,,uto,,
{. IL tzzarl 49,. ,,.v,.,,
No GoS L. j.. Brown and others appei'ens agt "ilis"
Rank Motion dismiss anlrIn submitted ,. .
No 7sJ Bushrod Robinson and others appellants AT
"a NoI Aupoal RON he