The intelligencer. [volume] (Lexington, Mo.) 1887-1891, 1888-11-24
CIRCUIT COURT DOCKET.
December Term. A. d. 1888.


FIRST DAY. DECEMBER 3, 1888.
l.. BasoOm, assignee, vs. W. r. Jackson ct
al. damages; continued generally.
2. James Z McGrew vs.. Mo. p. R'y. Co..
DAMAGES; continued generally.
8. Home Insurance Co. vs.. Benz. Eliiett,
administrator. appeal; continued at defendants
cost.
4 Albert Fulkerson, ex parte; application
for license.
SECOND DAY, DKcEMBKR 4, 1888.
8. Mo. Pac. R'y. Co. vs. H.. G.. Frsncisco. to
assess damages; continued at plaintIf's cost.
g.. State. use OF Bascom: assignee. W. jos.
w. Bowman ct al; on bond.
I Vim. Jackson VS.. WIN. R. Cunningham,
appeal; jury failed to agree.
8. IL. II. Hendricks, interpleader, vs.. fink
& Nasse. attachment; reversed and remsnded;
motion for bond for costs
Q Eliza NJ Franks vs.. WIN N. Franks. d.
vorce; default and continued.
10 State, use OF VIM l.. Catron, vs.. Jos w
Bowman ct al. On bondi continued at plain,iH's
cost.
continued at defendants cost.
THIRD DAY, DECEMBER 5. 1888.
II. Observation-Disclosures Bank Va. Jos. h
Shelby ct al. note; continued generally,
~. Mamie L; Beal vs.. Ira N. Bsai, divorce:
IA X S Blliingsiey & Co. vs.. Belt and
Erskine. on Judgment; motion 70 strike out:
Ing, damages: sas deposited by plaintin..
i6. II c. Harding ct a VS.. k c. Cable R'y.
Co damages from jackson county.
IL. FANNIE fOTDDuCkle CT al Va. hOUerL
RaIney; appeal.
FouRTu DAY, DEcKMBKK 9. 1888.
Is. J. Mal0ney vs.. Miller Il Saylor. damages
amended petition filed.
10. Hattie B. wilmot ct al VS.. Mo. Pac. R'y.
90 , appellants; appeal. =.
20 J. j. Caldwell vs.. Bagnell and Scott
81. r. S. McClelland VS.. II. M. Turley. APP
pellant; appeal; continued generally
22. John A. Hickman vs.. James X. Hick-
man, appellant; appeal; continued generally.
%. Morrison Wentworth Bank vs.. Jos. d.
Shelby ct al; answer nled.
FIFTH DAY. DECEMB CIR 7, 1888.
"a. Robert C. Greer VS.. Geo. Youngs. on
judgment; continued at defendants cost.
appellant. Va. Estate WIN. II. FerreI; appeal.
20. R. NJ. Barley vs.. J. N. Frazier ct al;
u. J. F: HARDWOOD VS.. g. C. Evans. appel.
rs. Isaac v. Roberts VS.. Amos Brand ct al,
SIXTH DAY. DEcKhsRR Q, 1888.
20. Matilda swInk vs.. Lloyd Swink, divorce
default and continued.
80. State National Bank. Fort Worth, vs.. r.
L. W. A. Greer, note; answer nisd.
divorce; proof publicly made.
q. Benz. Elliott, administrator. vs.. Ann II
Keith. interpleader. Geo, G. Keith. defen.
49,. State use VIM. Nj. Keith vs.. Russell, 4
Psddicord. on bond; $50 deposited with clerk
-. John NJ. Woodson VS.. Frank S~chwsnholt
| NyCStAnShtp a
SEVENTH DAv pEcEMBEn 10, 1888.
%. Stephen s. White vs.. W.. r.. Cunningham
etal, motel bond for costs to be died 20 days be
IS. Alfred Carr. sup... etc.. vs.. Richar'
Brett ct al. damages; 30 days to plead to psti
ton.
81. Robt. Lee smith vs.. Mary Ann witAsr
ct al; to correct deed.
50. c. o. jenkins VS.. D. C. Bagsarlv ct al
damages; so days alter term to plead to petition
80 J. Il. Morsland vs.. Dora Weasel ct al
sJectment; answer filed
40. VIM 8. Epperson VS.. James Z. Hall
account; amended petition hled.
EIGHT DAY, DECEMBER IL, 1888.
Al. Emil Schroeder vs.. Charlotte Schroeder
divorce: answer fled.
a. Mary A. Robertson ct al VS.. sophroni
AZ. S. l.. Chapman Va. James A. Scott ct NJ
account; motion Tor cests.
~. Stephen Lamere vs.. James A. Scott tree
pass; answe r died.
As. Sol. Kahn vs.. S. M. Clark; note.
10. David e. Butler vs.. Geo. T.. Goodwin;
notes.
II. hartman & Bro. VS.. David Rekop. gu AZ
A.. American Bank VS.. Seth welborn ct al
~. Sarah A. Warren We. Thos. A. Groves
note.
NINTH DAY. DECEMBER IL. 1883.
81. Sarah K. Self VS. Henry Q. Self; diyorc.
81. Jsmei Masterson ct al vs.. Jacob Master
son ct al, partitions; Onmisslone appointed
81. Ellen Adams Va. VIM. ADAM; diyorc,
5s. James d. Ish vs.. Mary Hanley ct al; pal
tilIon.
81. ohas. d Williams vs.. Alice A. William
ct al, partItiuon; default vs.. adults.
l5. Villa . aud Morrison. assignees Q
j D.. Davis i Son; assignment.
50. John T.. Bascom. assignee of g. W. Graz
ASH snment.
81. state, use ofJ r Smith ct al, vs.. Nj
Pac. R'y. Co. mandamus.
So State, use HaXel, Va. Thomas E. Chin
/ writ of prohibition; demurrer submitted.
50. Daniel Rich vs.. Elizabeth Rich; dIvorci
W. John u. Rose vs.. Catharins Ros,
divorce.
: 81. Minnie L. Jarvis vs. John II. Jarvis; d
; vorce.
? SO. Kate Washington VS.. James Washington
divorce.
TENTH DAY, DECEMBER Is, 1883.
az. Maria Brown W. william Brown; d
uorce.
= 81. Lizzie s. Mansell vs. Charles B. Ma
. sell: divorce.
{ IS. John h. Bsscom. assignee OF II. d. Gree
assignment.
68 Interstate r.. L. R'y. 90. VS.. d.
WeIderman ct al: to assess damages.
81. Interstate K. L. R'y.Co vs.. NJ. +. Ma
5 nard ct al; to assess damages.
. 20 Richard W. RrOught0n, assignee Of VIZ
IL. Terrell; assignment.
20. Conrad GwIsIer VS.. W. b. Starts ct al.