Daily Republican. [volume] ([Wilmington, Del.]) 1874-1890, 1888-12-19

Court resumed proceedings this morn
ing with ell the judges present.
j. n. Boa okeF, kyq presfntad ths
petition Of Elisabeth Mailer OF ths
Logan House, DglaWAFe avenue and
Dupont stEsek There IVES o E3mon.
STRANGE against II, and Mt. Bo6eokei
read several letters recommending the
application.
There was q rmOnstyAnoe aGainal
granting the application OF Edward j.
Newell, No. 800 Maryland avenue. He
was represented By l.. o. VandeRriit,
Rsq., who presented several le,tsrn and
= petition recommending the spp ioAni
and the plAos.
The case Of Louis Wiki r, No 1915
FIenoh street, was next taken mp, and
Mf. Pickett pre- Gated q strong remon-
STRANGE Agaiust Il, signed BY tho Rev.
George Bradford, pastor OF 81. Patrick't
Church, and . large number OF Others
The applicant was represented by Law
D Bird, Esq.t - special council, aud
Ward s. Hayes on behalf OF tho Liquor
Dealers Association.
Mr. Pickett said he had no witnesses,
and Mr.. Bltd eallsd John J, Gallagher,
Or. sbortlidRe, joseph Stosokle, Fran
els Kelly, Henry Mcdonnell, BAmuel
u. Chad Wiok ADD John Ouddy, each OF
whom tettlhtd in favor Of the applicant,
aud some said that Father BFsdford't
opposition 10 tbs taloon WAS caused by
The fact that he wished 10 buy the prop
eFty for bis ow0 use.
The Appllslt on Of John Guok, NJ
207 East Eczema street, WAS neg, taken
up. This 10 the place that Was kept b.
The late Caroline KlinEer, and there was
a 81 II.
signed against granting the appllca
lion.
The applicant was represented b.
William y 5mAlley, Esq, who calico
Cody AnienFeF. DR.. Morrison aud
Others, who were examined TO shoH thal
The applicant IL . msu Of excellent
character. Mr.. Pickett o. led 0torge
8 HagAny 10 show that their was ~
abundance OF saloons in that vicinity
without this.
The olses OF GuHtGvs Kolk, No 2il6
katket street, and George Adele, Jr., Of
Eleventh and Church streets were oa,l
ed, and Mr. Pickett said that both these
places had been refused licenses at pre-
yiOus terms Of court. Neither Of the
applicants were reprf ssnted by connect
The application Of Enruer q PuTohl
st the north west corner o. Third and
AAdisOn EtToets, WhB tho next consider
90. This was cppnesc by Mr. Picket
and supported by Mr. Bird.
Father Bradford, who hal been sent
for, came In court, and was placed on
tie stand 10 vludloate himself from thu
charge that he Withsd 20 purchase the
Winklar property for his own use. He
said that the saloon was an annoyance
and nulaAnee TO St, PAlrlok's Church,
znd that was his solo &c lson for Wishing
to pnrchssa the property, The ohu'cS
was uuabl0 20 bug IL, aud he would
have bought IL hm'Blf two or thres
yeas $40, bu, cou a not ct present
Mr.. Pr chet, opposed the application
OF Mlobasi Fitzgerald, BouthWtbt eorne'
OF PH,lfth and Clayton streets, en- thu
ground that II vas . now application,
and bad also besn rHtueed at previous
term ct court. There was n long re.
monstFAuoe agar 81 granting the license.
The applicant was represented by Wal
tor IL. Hayes, Esq, who offered 10
Vas needed, but the court declined 70
tear them.
George W. GHfGh, Elaventh AND
Thatcher, was the next taken up. II
vas demonstrated sgAinst, aud DO Wa
not r6pres nte1.
The next case taken up vas that OF
John IF Gallagher, M SOC TAtnal
street. There was = remembrance
against II, and the applicant Wal repre-
scented by 8 A. @cOs'llner, Esq.
Theie was q rsmou GttAnca AsAinGi
Oatharine CLARK, OF Lobisll aud Will
liam street, and Il WAS also stated thai
II had besD previously refused.
Edward OAllAp, Seventh az mrs NEd
Duncan street. wAa also Feia unstrAted
Agaiast. At O'Clock court took a re.
cess until O'Clock this afternoon.