New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1888-04-11
C0uRT oF APPEALS.

Albany, April 10.-In the Court Of Appeals to-day the
following decisions were handed down.
John A. McDougaL claimant ag[ The State Award
Affirmed with costs
People respondents. asL E Remington and Sons appel.
ans William a ssss 1oe rsA snds se Henr
W. Chamberlain. and others appellants May Anh Sse5
snts Frank L. Herdle, appellant asL Charles Hoessle
nsPO1dsnti Water NJ Hunt agpea3 AT AsySf e'T o.
David I. Kennedy appellant; John IL GaIagh respond
s1lief T seward. respondent agt CITY Of Rochester
sppelznt Wnants appellant sgt Marcus u Disseieaiu
spSsi1nt EseKel T. BELL respondent sgL Edward L
GILam MckelsI appellant; Edward hopes, respondent
.yt Auburn WateTw0rks Company. appellant John
prank Meoqade Iesgondent ag Manhattan Rallied Com
JON sttscn' appellant Ma.thes D. Brsen respOndent
sgt New-Yofk central and Hudson River Railroad Com
EsSbu igs appellant. Froian SoraHds and Oihs respond
,gpensst; Cloths r Hoamsn, appellant sgt Amanda N.
beGrsf, respondent Judgment an1Fmed with costs
nt 6raei reversed snS ssss RENTED % the supreme
gog Of further consideration, Without costs In this court
Isabella Cunning. respondent sgt Brooklyn City Rail
ioad appellant AdeAa f. HILL appellant ssL Ninth Ave
Scas New Yoi cents and Hudson River Raos
Aeliy T. fsW' appellant. Judgment reversed; new
ss granted costs abide TIE event People s appel;
- ~ Drank Palmer, respondent judgment OF Senersi
Fem reysrsd and that Of oyer and TsrnneI Of Clinton
~ sse Horatio n Eye and others appellants Judgment
s 9S Remington and Others respondents 3ras
against plaintiff on stipulation with costs
r.. James GOcdsel respondent sgt Western Union
Tern entered upon report Of rfefse reversed aad
ss tla granted costs TO abide events unless plaintiff
ss4a lis ,tcons cause " sc:.Jn 10 which .Sens
IL this court upon is merits
FsSps appellants ast Henry Stevens respondent
conviction arned sreeny case afed '
re application OF Charles Gurtum sgt Board Of Super
sass spsaS hfSP CHAPLIN Scs SaEo %
respondent. Order affirmed with costa
PEGS saRsss1s 61dei 1A Of 't Ssas ana
q Term s asan en- h Sssh
ing there upon action
ssss d . s Ma,sS SGsnsas
"a aaa Ts az ana grating new @ should be reversed
JIM Sse P' sSSsAd s9''iels
.,, 10Fas Kney appellant ss. Western Union Tele.
nsa ,ad aasnsa sSssSte rendered against pIanid
9': 10 s1s ssss, ,ls PR.:Ssd
vim ooa: orders AND judgments appealed from affirmed
sss e. TX '; Sss Is Il AZ, ..J u n. 7o
AlsAsf April lc-in the Court Of Appeals to-day the M
swing esusss were argued
s.' AND Loan ru, Company
c'TT s.s,r and p, 0.Ssst s:'DS1d's H
Hss ana s oss:1 ss:ossS:s DsaPs
sssnl.ma for appellant and william T. WIZARD "a, n.
Ne i.fsk-yoha w. Hsywsra, r.sp.uss., A., ,..,.,
s.s ssess sIpensS.s Arsssas Jsss a.ssiis ter
ne lfee-esmasi r Lsd1ov and others rssno,s.,,. 49,.
w AssA appellant Argued BY ssvs ssrsssotf n,
a.. liss-winism r Hart respondent Ar, Ham,,
srpesst Submitted. ' 'ohn-
s:s.ssi s s,o. ., M,. r''Ds.a'.s .xs Mari. n
NSLake-wniiam =. Cornell respondent AT rrsd.v,,s
Se,,s~s esa ethsrs UreAsSfck Hohskaa pureh.s.~ @
"a - Afsssa ~ u. l. oAsdssy sn apyslsst j. -
NouoNG
~ s7s-wnlisu O An,..n ana oxh.,. ,r,.,..
ssSS;s Asssszosh. sssDsaasat Motion fss nsn
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
s@o. April fe-ln sAe suprems Court Of tn