The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1888-02-12
THIS WAY BUSINESS RUNS
Love TIME BETWEEN FINES IN m,
fOhAT7ON CAsES WI"

lawyer rreu w. Dlenl TOT the Corporate,
A~ttorney-omoe Cahill. state what you ssvos
the sidewalk front OF 610 Second aysnns =
you saw anything.
ofacer Cahill-saw q slgnboard. II -.
Herman Wunske's.
Lawyer Tallman. for defendant tsavaVel,L
How do you know 1t was wunske's7
Of1cer C~ahill-Didn't he tell me 50?
Lawyer Tallman tpetulantly)-Now, ofn..,
why don't you answer my question:
Officer Cahill-Ain't l answered 1t. Yon a,s
me how l knew that 1t was Wunske's sign
tell you thar Wunske told mo 1t was his SIGN
Lawyer Tallman tpleadlnx to Courtl-i al
your Honorto direct the stenographer to s,rt.
Justice Lachman-No. We cannot do tb,.
LAWYER Tallman-obiection. You say that
very imnortant points. You have seen that sisaus'
OGlcer .Cahiiil Ia 81 wrinkle appearing in tn,
corner Of his mouth)-Hats trimmed with yon,
LAWYER Tailman trepsatinel-Ha. trimmed
With your W material you saw How wash
onirer 'Cjahtl truzzledeEh2
Lawyer Was 1t written. printed, 0,
put en- With chalk z 80,
The Court had had enough Of Wunsk., ,,n
for the present. The case was adjourned IN.
" L asys u D%fiieehRl.John j.. Cunningham and
Michael. A. Cunningham, $50 Second svsn sSs
sign in front Of parketf
Lawyer. Tallman Observation-Disclosures
" o ono r c "a hill NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. Sa MI IN S-ofndtse they did
not. It is many a long day since they put Il
LsWyeT TaIIIman turning upon policeman
that John j. Cunningham and Michael 4. Gun.
bingham. and who else put hat sign out ths,
With their PVT WI hands a :, ii, ,ou..
aetiy with their hands. But they Kept it thsrss
1t was doveloned that this sign had benin
that Policeman Cahill's complaint ought 10
have been made under tho law of 1886. instead
| ninghams was not legally authorized.
Justice Lachman to LAWYER Diehl-Aealna
WAN ha%y a9 S 8ie ffk Ssr aps Suing tho firm. W,
ask judgment against Michael A. We served
ch hissssri ea R!le!-fh i2ss .s ssss; G Sase.r: I .s.i
ofiee < Gahiffl-chin Long. Chinese Laundry.
Lawyer Diehl-wbsre was it2
Officer Cahi!!-In the second story.
window! H9T could you see what was onl'
Offcer Cahill-To be sure I can't; but l can
English: This ~ sign sGnS Vas / in English u.
Oficer CahilI-Yes. / know Chin Sing.
LAWYER TaIIman lsughineNGo AWAY. You
nom Sfio se0SSS a Sh!asfe' be sure I did not speak
Chinee. Chin Sing CON speak as good English
as Xon or l. lUproar IN COURT
Lawyer Tnllman tbeseechingly-1 wish. your
Jackson 4 Xrc GiSsa raj Iron S MeGka "s1 / 9hin n
can Ia sRSM BIZ haSs ies w5 Gahil ia Shst did you
ON nna Nov On if 15p OF szs East reimbursement street
1l1sss 6%SShf s}Edn So Sas;ts' II, $. and %,
Lawyer Tallman..Obiect. I shall obi.c.
w gsst %o1 Ta than Sne i%Rs abesal is J G5Sysn; over.
WIG. MCCARTHY came forward and swor,
not tho JACKSON Who ran the Architectural Irs o
was. il he knew as.S but eh his tsst dnss s" was sui !.
1sient to 3vertura the policeman's evidence.
LAWYER Diehi~Patriok Mcdonald. coal and
wood, Thirty-fourth street. Officer CahiL
what's the matter with his premises?
Lnwyer, Taiiman (apparently wrought up TOW
high 8gmpcsi,r c Gsh;Y 2sIis do YOU u, do , for a IA liHyins1
note bookI am a policeman.
Lawyer Tallman-Di ye have to look In thG
book to find that out?
Lawyer is.'sse . TaiimanaN fss { se GH M row 70 sha. pro.
cinct you are attached?
Qf1cer Cahi!l-Twenty-f1rst.
Lawyer Tallman-What are it's boundaries?
Officer Cahill-Forty-second street, Fourth
Avenue. Twenty-seventh street, First avenue.
LAWYER Tallman--Have you your assignment
70 Gsts ! preecin;Gtt With you?
Lawyer Tallman Ito the C~ourt)-Thats all
Same objections. your Honor. in this case as In
Lawyer Diehl-Henry. Kettleman. 2o4 East
Thirty-fourth street, sign across the street.
What did you find there. ofacer3
GaSsF Gtshi Observation-Disclosures,
Lawyer DiehI~Move to amend the Complaint
oMcsr dahipl said that Kett ieansnu was known
70 him; and was q carpenter. No amount OF
Rikuses, " oS court n@wye ees nai,ms dec fSela change
lRadisy, Eli East Thirty.foHrths street. Mhaii
Lawyer TaIImano.-Howd do you knowthat they
ss Sdie esst Ss 81 e@Si have I my eyssishs for
LAWYER Tallman lin a'voice OF thunder-YsY
n Wots sit te on ' The IRON aM cay casst aGng, we're your louoia
Officer cshili!Noi could not. These wer. chain;
steal them. These w were sa Chained theirs Tea at least
,e Ts Xxx .y STSs!i%sS ibS, BITE yen yss.s asked , NOV
We can .try these cases without help. move
TINT all this last part DO stricken out.
Justice Lachman-Go on. Mr.. Tallman.
Lawyer Tallman-There is no evidence to
connect Valentine Cook and John B. Radley
Wheel i IN fsen ir of al ca East ~ chained sYs to w s,.Ssa
Justice Lachman-How Is 1 that. Mr.. Diehl?
Lawye! Diahl-Well. perhaps. not as to Cook.
there is He was served BY our process
Justice decentralization reserved.
m %ss : c Dlsnir / ere, bsr a e g.. T ! want tx to n.y.
and carpets on walk. sign across tho
walk: There oil Nov. 8 and Nov. IL.
Officer Cahill-Yes, sir.
Lawyer Tallman-I object to counsel leading
the witness. Now. what do you know OF tho
q this store. 37s Third avenue?
qihcer CEhill-l knew Coogan ownsit.
~ 81 well posted on the Cooean family as you are.
There. AIR; Diehl, 60 ahead and post the wit
ness. Hen tell you the names OF all the mem.
bers OF the nrm in q moment after he hears
You say.
1t turned out that Cahill did not know tho
firm at all. nor whether they ran tho
store or not. Dismissed.
Law Iat TThhiiimanmGo back 70 the James naTy
he last days trial that you BARRY told MIN