The Brookhaven leader. [volume] (Brookhaven, Miss.) 1883-1891, 1888-01-05
CHANCERY COURT.

proceedings were had:
FIJI Hartman VS. Hannibal Duke. et al
Pr" con fesso against all the defendants.
Duncan h Magee, administrator, "
Estate Of John neutrality-suspicious.
of the estate confirmed.
E Pieifer VS. Martha Carlisle, ct al
Pro con fesso taken against the defendant
Sam Mitchell VS. James Brown-Pro col
fesso against the defendant; final deere,
reforming deed adjudging the land to b,
lying in Section %, t8rSe.
Alexander Washington VS. Sarah Wash
ington-Final decree dissolving the bond
of matrimony existing between the plain
tiff and defendant.
Ephraim g Peyton VS. f p Gibert-Pr,
con fesso against all the defendants; deere,
for 1902.
A E McLaurin VS. A Lewenthal, jr ct a
In this case the Chancellor was disqual
flied by reason of his relationship to the
plaintiff and NJ Green, an attorney, wa,
chosen by lot TO preside in the Chancellor,
stead; thereupon decree was rendered con
frming the sale of lands and authorizing
A Iewenthal ttdeliver to E L Martin tn,
purchaser, deed to the. land.
j B Deason VS. Hugh L Nations, ct al
Final decree Diminishing the cause at the
cost Of the complainant.
Amelia Less VS. F w Less-Decree con.
frming sale of the lands and directing
commissioner to execute and deliver tc
the purchaser deed.
c Atkinson VS. H Shurley ct al-De-
cree confirming sale of land.
c Atkinson VS. S c and L r Alford-Pro
con fesso taken against the defendants.
W L Reeves ct al, petition for sale OF
lands for partition.
Viola Clark VS. Julia Moak, ct al-Pre
codfesso taken against the defendants; and
decree appointing r W McNair, Commits
sioner to sell the land.
+ ii Hartman VS. Hannibal Duke-De-
cree reforming papers in the cause; + NJ
Martin master IN chancery reported amt
due complainant, Hartman, to be the sum
of S454 which was by the court approved;
unless the defendant pays said amount in
ten days and the clerk of the court is made
commissioner to sell the lands mentioned
in the mortgage to satisfy the decree.
First annual account OF Berry Peevy
guardian of Charles Crane.
+ III Davis VS. + H Hartman-De
of the defendant over-ruled and 80 DAYS
allowed. in which to answer.
NJ f Wesson VS. Amos Hodges-Demur-
rer filed by the defendants over-ruled and
thirty days allo 0ed in which to answer.
Board of Supervisors VS. Frank W Lord
Pro con fesso against defendant; decree
for the sum of $459,70.
F II Hartman VS. T Case, ct Alan
order requiring the sheriff to pay at .once
to G. S Mcmillan and A Lewenthal, ir.
their fees as commissioners in the above
stated case, to be paid tor out of the pro-
ceeds of sale made by the sheriff in this
cause
A Z Weathersby, ct al vs. Hamilton &
Hoskins-Decree cancelling tax deed to
certain lands purchased by the defendants
from the State.
Nancy Cupit VS. Simon Cupit-Final de-
cree disoiving the bonds of matrimonv ex-
listing between the parties.
d A Patrick guardian of Edith l. Pat
rick-Decree confirming sale of lands.
ii A Earns VS. A Mangold ct aide
murrer of defendant sustained and bill
dismissed.
r III Thompson, ct al, ex, VS. Estate of
Laura Williams-Decree confirming and
approving fourth annual account of the
executor.
Adler Golman ct al VS. George W Roll
Inns, ct al-Comrromised and bill dis
missed.
Berthold & Jennings VS. w HosKins-
Decree confirming sale.
Susan Cox VS. George Riehlman--De-
cree for the sum OF $50.
c Hardy VS. A Hoskins-Taken I'M
der advisement by the court.
Ephralm McComb VS. J.Mac Buckley ct
al-Pro con fesso against defendants.
John Thornhill VS. Rebecca Thornhill
Decree divorcing the parties.
II Cassidy VS. Lie Oliver ct al-Demur-
rer of the defendant over-ruled and sixty
days given IN which to answer.
State, use etc. VS. J J. Mikell, ct al
Judgement nj 81 imdosing upon the Sheriff
of Washington county a fine of 500 for a
failure to execute writ of garnishment
issued in the above cause against S Yerger
and L Gay.
Minerva Evans VS. Elijah Evans-De-
cree dissolving the bonds of matrimony
existing be the parties.
l. c. Railroad VS. Meridian, Brookhaven
& Natchez Railroad Taken under adj
vi ement by the court.
J A S Henderson VS. F III Hartman
Taken under advisement by the court.
A New Firm.
Messrs. Richard Alcus and Henry Mey-
er have nnrchased the stock of l.