New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1888-05-15
FERRIS, TOO, LOCKED UP.
STILL PROBING AT THE HATCH MYSTERY.
THE JUaY's sUsPIcloxs AROUSED By DETECTIVE
CIARKs STORY.

THE JURYs sUsPICIoNs AROUSED BIZ 'H'I"ii'"
CLARKs STORY.
Coroner Levy and the Jury engaged In the SOLUTION
~ tho Hatch case spent nearly seven hours yesterday
ON the task That time was consumed In inc exam
nation of Hve new witnesses, In the reexamlhatiou
of Mrs sconcld and In visiting the house at NO. o4
West Twrntieth-st where Mr.. Hatch met MS oos'i'
Ferris was last night sent 10 tho House OF pe'enon
IN default Of IS 900 bond for his attendance 'his
afternoon, when the investigation VIII DO rosuneu.
Mrs scoeeld was not detained, and Mr.. scofod plead
With the Coroner 70 have different quarters In the
pouse Of Detention assigned TO him from those as
signed TO Ferris. - !.
scoaeld,s testimony was only important because u
corroborated that Of his vito. He knew Mr.. Hatch'
he said and no also knew that MI. haich was oh
friendly terms with his wife and took her 10 inc ,ho
atre sometimes. lie did not object TO MS WHO nav
Ing such social relations with her broker but no de-
cdedlv objected TO his wife speaking to Ferris Ser
pe,nt schmitberger repeated what the Scohcids haa
stated TO him In the Nineteenth Precinct Police sta
lion House. 1t differs from their testimony ON! ~
helng less complete. MADAME Fanny" queor ntue
buxom Frenchwoman with bright yellow locks popping
out under the overshadowDg rim of huge biacK
topbeayy bonnet, testified TO what had happeheu III
her restaurant In West Twenty ono proNoa
to be an entertaining witness, though her testimony
in itself was valuable only because corfoporau'o'
FERRIS DEEPLY IMPLICATED
Edward A. Clark, an officer Of The Nineteenth
Police Precinct, employed in detective service ae INC
Coleman House, said that on Monday evening MI
Ferris. apparently much Hurrled, employed him To
watch the movements OF Mrs Sco1eh and Mr.. Hatch'
and gave him . SO bill and two cigars. Mrs. SEQ
field was then recalled and took the stand with
weary look on her face. The turymen worried hor
TIL she fairly lost her temper. They asked her the
same questions and over again, as to what doors
had been locked in her and what had not, and
30 forth and Coroner Levy at last advised them 10
90 up and take a look at the house. Mrs scoheld
said that she shocked TO hear that Mr. Hatch ana
she had been dogged by detective. Il am over
ubolmed with grief and corfusion,n she added. 49,, Pol
The Jurors then visited No. "a West Twentcth-st.
Thor visit was well timed, for they fed two canares
and cat that found in al advanced stage OF
starvation. An immense crowd gathered "itlou'
while the jurymen rambled from room to room within
hpding hero q hairpIn and there suspicious butter
knife, and in another corner Loaf OF mouidy pfcad
that looked as If it contained mystery. The jury
men appropriated various odds and ends TO give 10
the Coroner among them lirte diary with tho en-
try in January, 1885, that an individual called Miles
or such name would dine with bis beloved
Edna" on that date. Edna Is supposed by the Jury
to be none other than Mrs. Scoheld
THE JURY BEGINS TO SEE LIGHT
The conclusion that some members Of the jury have
come to is that Ferris was in hiding when Mr. Hatch
went home with Mrs. scoied and that no scared
Mr.. Hatch out OF the window and caused him to
lump from the roof Of the extension to the tree
David c. Ferris was examined when the jury returned
to room No. 10, City Court, Chambers. Ho told a
long story about his relations to Mrs Sconeld for
last nineteen years He repeated again and again
that no hired the detective simply 10 crafty his
curiosity and then went straight home to bed. lie
was much surprised when told that he would
be held in 5000 bail, and his lawyer, Jerome Buck
after protesting because tho Coroner came 20 this reso
luton lae In tho day, said that his client would
make no attempt 10 find a bondsmah that night.
In accordance with order issued by Chief Justice
| McAdam Mt. scoGeld appeared in the City Court
Yesterday 10 be examined IN supplementary proceed
lngs the suit Of b. l.. Solomons sons uEhOsterers
on judgment obtained by thom against her on
October Ia, 1883 on which execution was issued and
returned unsatsfed On account OF Mrs. Scohold
having attend the inquest the examination was post
poncd for week.