Washington standard. [volume] (Olympia, Wash. Territory) 1860-1921, 1888-06-15
Suprene Court Docket.

Following are cas- IS to come before
the supreme Court at the July (ad-
iourned) term, which convenes in this
city on the 18th proximo, at , P. NJ:
34S. Hollen Parker and John f.
Boyer VS.. Timothy p. Denny; A. f.
Isham for appellants; Allen & Crow
ley for appellee.
453. Northern Pacific Railroad Co
W. James Holmes; Mcknight & Co.
and HYDE & Turner for appellant; J.
b. Allen and H. r. Andrews for appel
lee
800. H. II. Hungate VS.. W. C. Rolf
ct al; Allen & Crowley and ID. X. Han
ma for appellant; Sharpstein & sharp
stein for appellee.
J25. Elmon Scott and John l.. Vim
son vs. b. f. Patterson; Allen & Gese
for appellant; B. l.. d J. l.. Sharpstein
for appellee.
527. b. l.. Baker and wife VS.. Jas.
NJ. Prewitt; Allen & Crowley for appel
lants: Lasater & Isham for appellee.
500. Thornton w. Owsley vs.. Ore
gon Railway and Navigation Co.; An
ders, Brents & Clark for appellant
Allen & Gose and ID. J. Crowley for
appellee.
$50. A. l.. Davis & Son VS.. A. Old
akers and Sarah f. Oldakers; Allen &
Crowley for appellant; J. II. Lasater
for appellces.
532. Ivan X. Dawson ct al VS.. Isaac
Baum; Houghton, Grano & Jones and
Nash, kincaid & Fredonrich for appel
liant; Turner, Foster, Hyde e. Haggin
for appellee.
533 Catherine A. Frazier VS.. l.. p.
Yemen and w. E. Anderson P. P. Car
roll for appellant; Judson, Sharpstein
& Henry for appellees.
534. Z. S. Brown, as Receiver, etc
VS.. John w. Rauch; Scott, Allen, Gose
& Crowley for appellant; Cosgrovc &
Goldman for appellee.
535. Oregon Railway and Naviga
ton Co. VS.. Thornton w. Owsley; Ru
, fus Mallory and Allen, Gose & Crow
liant; Anders, Brents & Clark for ap
pellee.
537. David Marsh VS.. F. NJ. Wade
Doolittle & Pritchard and Cox, Smith
& Teal for appellant; Sullivan, Wal
ford, Allen 4 Crowley for appellee.
! 53S. P.W. Dillon VS.. Yakima Coun
ty; Knox & Fox and Cation, Hanfort
e. Belts for appellant; Griffiths fol
appellee.
500. J. Gardner Kenyon VS.. Wat
son C. Squire; 7. J. Humcs and W
Andrews for appellant; Burke & Hal
Ter and Strive, Haines & McMicker
for appellee
, $40. j. Gardner Kenyon VS.. Wat
son c. Squire and J. X. Williamson
I. j. Humes and w. r. Andrews fol
appellant; Burke & Haller and Strive
Haines & McMicken for apellees.
, SAG. C. p. Chamberlin VS.. o. C
, Vim; Sullivan, Wolford, Sullivan ant
c. $. Voorhees, for appellant; Allen &
Crowley and T. II. Brents for appel
lee.
$40. John c. Turner, Auditor
: Whitman county, VS.. S. J. Saxon; Ii
. Kincaid for appellant; Sullivan ct a
for appellee.
ccA' CtS'iHShlB IuuHO vs.. Tx
, United States; Strive, Haines & Nc
Micken and Mcknight, McGraw
Raison for appellant; W. II. White fo
: appellee.
555. J. Wilson Paxton Us. Cora
, N. Danforth; John Arthur for sp
pellant; Bronson for appellee.
, 557. The ship Blue Jacket, hel
tackle, ETC., VS.. The Tacoma Mill Co.
5 Mcknight, Hanford & McGraw fo
appellant; Strive, Haines & Nc
) Micken ios appellee.
563. Yakima county VS.. J. NJ
Fullan; II. J. Sniveiy for appellant
Reavis for appellee.
SO. John w. Rauch ct al VS.. The
County OF Garfield; w. A. George
Allen 4 Gose. D. J. Crowley ant
Elmon Scott, for appellants; Nnfin.
ger & AndeIs n~d Brents 4 Clark iol
: appellee.