New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1888-02-25
MISS COFFIN DEcLARED TO BE SANE


,ard,c, in favor of Miss Elizabeth Cohn was
rendered yesterday ny the sherTs jury won mas oeeh III
vestgatins question whether sue IL sane anu '~p "
taking care property Three hours wre oocupeu ~
-, aad,tion,l testimony. Emra n. Gould, with
xnom Miss Colin boarded testified that she was irregular
,oont gong meals and that she WAS out sometimes
mill or 10 o'clock evening The witness had repr
nandei for being out 40 late MISS conn 'ol" no ~
,he attending school OF acting
Peter Bowen who SAID he was employed In washins
windows and laying carpets at the stltevant House
AZ the time lived there testinedthat on oIe oco
sion she sail to him; 81 will FIX you VIII TX yoa'
At another time she threatened TO Kill him.
"You as window washer had great facilities for look
ing in other peoples business remarked K-Judge Curtis
Eyes SIR" responded the witness demurey'
Mr.. sa,t, Coffin the Of the Young woman stated
MAJ she had not seen Ter daughter for eighteen months
you don't feel any toward her." Mrs Colin was
asked.
.Oh no " she replied II love her just as dearly"
rxJulge Curtis letter from Miss Colin dated ia'
Thursday IL she stated that Mr. why VINO mas ck
NJ estate dare appear In court against nov anu
that the proceeding begun Tor the purpose oil Fen her
nr,rerv away from The Jury after fifteen minutes DO
liberation found Miss Coffin was not nsine anu wa"
capable OF taking care of her property.
HER MONEY FAILED TO WIN HUSBAND.
verdict for the defendant directed by in ge hhrhoh
In the city yesterday in The suit oil John as
sicn-e O the claim Of MIRA Emma @ui'n against n
U, nronrie or OF matr monil agency at No III East
rn,rty.drst-st publisher of The Ne" forR CUPID INC
Ju1ge based dec sion the gronnh tha' 'ho o""
WI
rubc policy This contract was in the following "os
'1''' ' JUNE q 1881
.Nt,s Onion from Mr. we,lman SO On August 10 II at
MAJ ue she Is wiling give all WIN geuto
men S ~ we're Introduced ~ SnF nsuhcr ny II D.. w a.
u Mr. s GGSn %s $50 sH Due Mr. wemsn Ma
+ F. G 81 o n---'-'
Mrs 0uon testified that wenan introduced her 70 many
nea bdt none OF them suited
"Did you reject a certain MI heatihg' asAeu '"o "'
who appeared for the defence ~
Mr. Heating did not propose" replied the witness MS
bn,ness with Inc not matrimonial but hhahcsi anu
,h.r could ,av was to have ahusband by August 10.
l5s7. my s55" ..,oo,.,
The dsteu ant that he only agreed 10 Introduce o
N sutlsnen and nothing When she gave MN me
g. he s,ld that sine dld order 10 make him "ork
harder in her eres The judge cut the case snort oy SUI"
ae liz Announcing his decision in favor OF the defendant
TRYING TO KEEP TON" GOULD OUT OF PRISON.
The question whether TON Gould has violated the IN
function order forbdng furnish music ana qusr al
the same place in West Thirty hrsst' when mas
been by his WAS argued yesterday In the eu
oreme Court Chambers before Justice Patterson The de-
cson Assistant Corporation Counsel Turnef
for the notion Gould counsel real s avits by
,mpoye, of the place who testified that Gould not the
Dvner OF manager the time when detectives say
tey Jaw Gould there simply as guest An
sdvit wogan to the effect that ne was te pro
puet Of the place nothing To do with II
presented rected the points Of the ahdav
made by the detectives argued that the statement tina
Gould had sold the place unworthy OF belief