davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26
Lewis Addition to st. Paul.

GRADING LITCHFIELD STREET..
FROM RICE STREET TO SYLVAN
STREET.
LanouX' Subdivision of Lots 7, and 9.
BaZllle'S Acre Lots, st. Paul.
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26
Supposed owner and Amt of
description. Lot. Block. Judgm't
ln44 H.

GRADING SYCAMORE STREET,
FROM RICE STREET TO SYLVAN
STREET.
iltson's Subdivision of Lots 8, 4, 5, 6, Z,
s, 9 and 10, Guerin's Out Lots,
st. Paul.
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26
Kinney, Bond & Traders Addition

Kinney, BOND & Traders Addition.
Supposed owner and
description. Lot. Block.
ii RanSOme lex
cept street, ........ IL s44.S1
G NJ Mackubin lex
same Except street,. 2 IA 17.4s
Supposed owner and Amt of
description. Judgm't
Minnesota Rendering Company.
Commencing on eaSterly line
OF NV of ne u of section IL,
town %, range %, 975 feet
SLY from nelly corner of said
NV a OF ne n; thence WHY
S07 4S 100 #; thence SLY 71S fit
to bank of Mississippi river;
thence nelly along said river
|. to ely line of lot 2, said Sec
ton III thence 4S0.12 fit to
beginning, being parts of lots
Is and 10, Partition Plat, st.
Paul Except Sly 29S fit of lot
IL, and SLY POS # of ely 65 it
of lot 15, Partition Plat ...... SS17.41
j T Mcmillan. Southerly 29S
feet of lot 16 and SLY 29S # of
ely Is tt OF lot Is, Partition
Plat. st. Paul Except street, 81, 2SS.73
NJ Delaney and M j O'Connor.
Commencing at point on My
line of section II, town IS,
range %, said point being
1,626.50 feet from ne corner
of said section; thence Willy
ll7.29 tt to railroad; thence
sw'ly along railroad 1885 fit to
ne corner of land of A Fl Wild
er; thence SLY along Wild
er's land 1,767.U7 #; thence
so deg 81 min along Mis-
sissippi river 331.S4 it; thence
1,693.10 it to beginning lex
cept street next to Mississippi
river, being part of lot Is, Par
tition Plat, st. Paul. .........S4 ,99S.21
Minnesota Rendering Company.
Commencing at point in the
nOrtheasterly corner of NV II
of ne Il of section 10, town 2S,
range %; thence SLY 1875 fl;
thence Willy 3074S TT; thence
1875 ft to beginning lex
cept st. Clair st), being part of
lots Is and 16, Partition Plat,
st. Paul. S409. So
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26
j. F. Eisenmenger's Addition to St.
Paul.
Supposed owner and

RE-ASSESSMENT FOR GRADING
AND BOULEVARDING SUMMIT
AVENUE TO A WIDTH OF 200
FEET, FROM LEXINGTON AVE
NUE. WESTERLY TO THE EDGE
OF THE BLUFF NEAR THE MIS-
SISSIPPI RIVER. JUDGMENT
ENTERED IN THE DISTRICT
COURT MAY 10, 1888.
Wright's Encouragement of Blocks %,
%, "a and 25, Anna E. Ramsey'S
Addition to st. Paul.
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26

Supposed owner and Amt of
description. Lot. Judgm't
Greenleaf Clark. S3I 30
III Greve Except railroad) 25 81 IS
NJ l. Oliver except rail-
road =. ..............2e Isle. 42
Same Except railroad... 81
Subdivision of Block rs, Stinson, Brown
& Ramsey's Addition to st. Paul.
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26
.ce'S First Addition.
Supposed owner and AM

Chas Weide's Subdivision of Block 20.
Arlington Hills Addition.
Supposed owner and Amt of
description. Lot. Judgm't
Arthur w brewery. $l1O.2O
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26
Bergholtz's Subdivision of Lots 2, 8, 4,
5, 6, 10, II, IA and Is, BaziIle's
Acre Lots, st. Paul.

GRADING FRONT STREET. FROM
RICE STREET TO SYLVAN
STREET.
BergholtZ's Subdivision of Lots 9. 8. q.
5, E, 10, II, IA and Is, Bazille's
Acre Lots, st. Paul.
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26

Julia Gagnon. Commencing at
a point on westerly line of
South Robert street $50 feet
My from My line of Annapo-
lis street; thence WHY to WHY
line of said lot 6, BidwelPs adj
dition to West st. Paul; thence
My 40 #; thence ely to WHY
line of said South Robert
street; thence SLY to begin
ming, being part of said lot 6,
said addition ................ s1Oe
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26
A NJ Lawton. Commencing at

A NJ Lawton. Commencing at
a point on westerly line of
South Robert street 195 feet
My from My line of Annapo-
lis street; thence WHY to WHY
line of lot 6, Bidwell'S addf-
ton to West st. Paul; thence
My along said WHY line of said
lot 6, 40 #; thence ely to WHY
line of South Robert street;
thence SLY 40 ft to beginning,
being part of said lot E, SAID
addition. 81
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26

Mary Gervais. Commencing at
point on westerly line of
South Robert street 5S7 feet
My from My line of Annap-
oils street; thence WHY to Willy
line of lot 6, Bidwell's addi-
ton to West st. Paul; thence
n'ly along said Willy line 40 TT;
thence ely to WHY line of said
South Robert street; thence
SLY 40 fit to beginning; being
part of said lot 6, said addition. $40,
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26

Varney and McManigal. Com
mencing at point on the east
erly line of South Robert
street 81 it My Of My line of
Annapolis street; thence My
SO TT; thence ely to ely line
of lot 6, Bidwell's addition to
West st. Paul: thence SLY
SO feet; thence Willy to begin
ming, being part of said lot g.. s25S.S7
Lewis n Haas. Commencing at
a point on eaSterly line Of
South Robert street 7S3 feet
My from My line of Annapo-
lis street: thence ely to ely
line of lot 6, Bidwell's addition
to West st. Paul; thence My
to n'lylIne of said lot 6; thence
Willy to ely line of South Rob-
ert street; thence Sly to be-
ginning: being part of said
lot 6, said addition. ......... S55. rs
A E Falk. Commencing at
point on easterIy line of South
Robert street 734 feet My
from My line of Annapolis
street; thence ely to ely line
of lot 6, BidwelFs addition to
West st. Paul: thence My 40
#; thence Willy to said ely line
of South Robert street; thence
SLY to beginning, being part
of said lot 6, said addition. $129.SS
Nellie March and w r Dennis.
Commencing at a point on
easterly line of South Robert
street 440 feet My from My
line of Annapolis street;
thence ely to ely line of lot
6, BidwelPs addition to West
st. Paul; thence My LAT #:
thence WHY to said ely line of
South Robert street; thence
SLY to beginning, being part
OF said lot 6, said addition. ssss.M
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26

Belle S Bruce. Commencing at
northwest corner of South
Robert and Annapolis streets;
thence My 81 feet; thence
Willy to WHY line of lot 6, Bid
wells addition to West st.
Paul; thence SLY to My line
of Annapolis street; thence
ely to beginning, being part
of said lot ..................S 211. 80
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26

GRADING MANITOBA AVENUE,
FROM RICE STREET TO SYLVAN
STREET.
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26
EaStville Heights Ambition
Supposed owner and

Supposed owner and Amt of
description. Judgm't
Pat KeOgh. Commencing 714.8
feet easterly from sw'ly cor
ner of sw 4 of section 81,
town 30, range %; thence ely
go #; thence My 655 it to
center of S a of sw a of said
section: thence Willy geo #;
thence SLY 665 it to beginning
Except Maryland street,, be-
ing i'll st. Paul, Minnesota. :. S974.4S
W NJ Stees. Southwest 4 of Sc
Il of section u, town 20, range
% Except Maryland street,,
being in st. Paul, Minnesota. 81, S5O.66
Same. Lot 6, section 81, town
90, range % Except Maryland
street,, being in st. Paul, Min
neSOta. ........ ,S99. IA
Same. West a of he Il of sec
ton rs, town %, range %, be-
ing in st. Paul. Minnesota lex
cept Maryland street,. ,s5O.66
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26

c Quick. Commencing at a
point on easterly line of South
Robert street 1875 feet My
from My line of Annapolis
street; thence ely to ely line
of lot 6, Bidwell's addition to
West st. Paul; thence My 40
#; thence WHY to ely line of
said South Robert street;
thence Sly to beginning, be-
ing part of said lot 6, said adj
ditiOp
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26
Woodbury. Sc Cases Addition.

Supposed owner and Amt of
description. Lot. Block. Judgm't
Woodbury. IL Rob
bins except My
47T fO ........... II $1S0.49
The West st. Paul Real Estate and I'M
provement Syndicate Addi-
ton No. l.
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26

L E Reynolds. Commencing at
a point ON westerly line of
South Robert street 293 feet
My of My line of Annapolis
street; thence My 40 it;
thence WHY to WHY line of lot
6. Bidwell's addition to West
St. Paul; thence SLY 40 #;
thence ely to beginning, be-
ing part of said lot &. .........
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26

Aug Korfhage. Commencing at
a point on easterly line of
South Robert street "a fit My
from n'iy line of Annapolis
street; thence ely to ely line
of lot 6, Bidwell's addition to
West st. Paul; thence My 40
TT; thence WHY to ely line of
said South Robert street;
thence SLY to beginning, be-
ing part of said lot 6, said adj
ditiOn
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26

B j Brayton. Commencing at a
point on westerly line of South
Robert street, 146 feet My
from My line of Annapolis
street; thence WHY to Willy
line of lot 6, Bidwell's addf-
ton to West st. Paul; thence
My along said WHY line 40 #;
thence ely to willy line of
South Robert street; thence
SLY 40 # to beginning, being
part of said lot 6, said addi-
tiOn q
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26
West st. Paul Proper.
Supposed owner and

Supposed owner and Amt of
description. Judgm't
Paul Martin and E Strassburger.
That part of lot 13, BidweIIs
addition to West st. Paul, ly-
ing northerly of the My line
of lot 1, block 153, West st.
Paul Proper, and SLY of the
SLY line of lot 6, block Isl,
West st. Paul Proper. pro-
duced ely to South Robert
street. $500
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26
Supposed owner and Amt of
deScriDtiOn Judgm't

Bridget OCOnneII. COmmenc-
ing at northeasterly corner of
Rice and Sycamore streets;
thence ely along My line
of Sycamore street $50 feet:
thence My parallel with Rice
street - S-l2 fit; thence ely
parallel with Sycamore street
$50 it to Rice street; thence
sly along Rice street 42 S-12
it to beginning, being in st.
Paul, Minnesota. ......... s1O2.6O
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26

Rice & Irvine's Addition.
Supposed owner and Amt of
description. Lot. Block. Judgm't
Chas and Henry
Lauer, nelly 1s....12 Al S129.99
Supposed owner and Amt of
description. Judgm't
L Mcmillan. The westerly 5
acres of that part of Sc 4 of Sc
Il of section 1, town IS, range
%, SLY of railroad except st.
Clair street,. ................S 81, 6S9.75
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26

RE-ASSESSMENT FOR GRADING
THE STREET NEXT TO THE
MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO APAR-
TIAL GRADE, FROM CHESTNUT
STREET TO JAMES STREET.
JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE
DISTRICT COURT MARCH %, 1888.
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26
Bells Second Addition.

Supposed owner and Amt of
description. Lot. Block. Judgm't
John Item Except
State street, "a s211.14
same Except State
street, .........-....4 171.69
West st. Paul Proper.
Supposed owner and Amt of
description. Lot. Block. Judgm't
John Item Except
State street,, .....4 80 $106.12
Bells Addition.
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26

NJ Il SIack. commencing at a
point on westerly line of South
Robert street 7S3 feet My
from My line of Annapolis
street; thence Willy to WHY line
of lot 6. Bidwell's addition to
West st. Paul; thence My
along SAID WHY line to My
line of said lot 6; thence ely
to said WHY line of South
Robert street; thence SLY to
beginning, being part of said
lot 6, said addition. ...........
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26

a VI SUCUIU1 u, VUWII %, IftIISV
% Except Maryland street, be
ing in st. Paul, Minnesota. SO, 717.14
RE-ASSESSMENT FOR GRADING
STATE STREET, FROM ISABEL
STREET TO INTERSECTION OF
SOUTH ROBERT STREET, AND
SOUTH ROBERT STREET, FROM
STATE STREET TO SOUTH CITY
LIMITS. JUDGMENT ENTERED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT MARCH
2S, 1888.
St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1888-06-26

A K Stees. Commencing at
northeasterly corner of u
of he 4 of section 2S, town 30.
range %; thence WHY 20
chains; thence Sly 1912
chains; thence ely 1876 chains;
thence II 10 deg Is min w s
chains; thence ely 4.S2 chains;
thence n 2l.25 chains to begin
ing except 1926 acres to st.
Paul Harvester Works. 1854
acres for road and Maryland
street,, being in st. Paul, Min
neSOta ...........,. 81 ,947, go
The Hawaiian gazette., 1888-10-30

In VIEW of the somewhat unfavorable
comments which have been made upon
the Government physician service, we
publish elsewhere the report of the select
committee of the Legislature recon-
mending reduction OF the salary list.
1t could hardly be expected that men
not overpaid in any case should increase
their devotion when their salaries are
cut down. But it appears to be the
complaint OF the fault-fnders, that the
physicians do not do enough. Perhaps
there may be grounds for complaint in
some cases, but we are glad to believe
that generally the Government physician
is self-sacrifcing and devoted to his
noble calling. The public health costs
the country an enormous figure when
contrasted with other lines of expense.
1t is an expense which ought to be cur
tailed wherever possible. What other
nation gives medical service to the peo-
pie, gratis2 In some senses it is the
truth that we have pauperiEed the Ha-
walian people.
The Hawaiian gazette., 1888-10-30

IT is a healthy sign when the COM
munity begins to take an interest in the
education Of the coming generation, and
from the number Of communications
that have appeared in our columns lately
it is very evident that this community is
keeping the subject well in hand.
We have made enquiries of the Board
OF Education with regard to the school
facilities at Spreckelsville and we learn
that the Board possesses no land in that
location whereon to build a school. We
also learn that the Inspector-General Of
Schools communicated some time ago
with Mr.. Morrison, the manager of
Spreckelsville, and that he replied that
there were not half dozen children,
around the mill and its vicinity, of school
age. He informed the Board that there
was number of Portuguese children at
camp three miles distant, and on the
next visit Of the Inspector-General this
matter will be attended to.
The complaint of observer" seems
to us somewhat unjust. There are
many good schools to which he can send
his children, and the Board, SO far as We
can learn, is straining every nerve to i'm
prove the condition OF the schools
throughout the group. New school
houses are going up in all directions and
very large number Of trained teachers
have been and are being imported from
the Coast.
The Board is supplying good educa-
ton free Of charge. If there are people
who desire select schools they must pay
for them out of their own funds. In San
Francisco the education is free and We
will venture to say that, taken as
whole, the personnel of many OF the San
Francisco schools are more contaminat-
ing than anything to be found in Hawaii.
We of course cannot speak from expert
ence, but our information is obtained
from American teachers who have taught
many years both at the Coast and in this
country and who know, from the actual
management of large establishments,
what they are talking about. The Gov
ernment cannot, in the nature of things,
establish schools purely for white
scholars. Whatever is established by
the state must be open to all members Of
the community. As for the children Of
whites attending our public schools,
observer" should read the report of
the Board of Education and he will find
that his figures are by no means correct.
The Hawaiian gazette., 1888-10-30

was not his exclamation on reading last
Tuesdays Bulletin, we mistake the man.
The column and half article on Z" The
Command of the Volunteers will do
him no good, and judging from the
course of our evening contemporary was
not intended to do him any good. His
services for the people are still too fresh
in the public mind to require any re-
minding. But he probably understands
as fully as anyone that the country has
other interests besides the military ques-
ton and that it is not necessary to the
public peace to stir up ill-feeling. Yet
this is the effect and purpose of said ar
ticle. We have not had the advantage
OF statements from members of the Min
istry on the matter OF the colonelcy, but
we challenge the truth Of some state
ments as to what Ministers did and said.
1t is false that the present military bill
was introduced after Col. Ashford's re-
signation to bolster up anyone. The bill
was prepared long before the session. 1t
was introduced June 9TH, and went to
committee where it was carefully revised
in the interest of the public as opposed
to the control by any one person of the
establishment. This is as it ought to be.
1t is as it is in Great Britain and in the
United States in effect. If this is what
the Bulletin means we must respectfully
dissent. 1t is not true that single Of
ficewa made and given to any person as
stated, and it is surprising that any jour
nal with any desire for proper reputa-
ton should make such statements. In
fact, the article appears to be tissue of
misstatements from beginning to end.
No doubt there are correct statements OF
fact in the article, but the truth may be
so worked over as to be very untrue.
We very much doubt the statement
about the Rifles being so disguised and
dissatisfied as to be on the verge of fall
ing to pieces. They are men of too much
good sense to fall into childish rage and
tumble to pieces because that Colonel
Ashford was not promptly commissioned.
We would be glad to know if q single
member of the force would admit that
their military existence is for Col. Ash
ford, and that it depends on him. Ger
tainly this was not SO represented to the
community when short time ago sew
eral thousand dollars were given them to
put their armory in good order and help
their equipment. We believe that to a
man they joined the organization, first,
to be of assistance to the country if
needed, and secondly, because many of
them enjoy the exercise aud occupation.
As for the private conferences of the
Cabinet on the subject we know nothing
and doubt whether the public have a
right to know of them, and as no mem
Der of the Cabinet would "give them
away" doubt the statements made. The
evident intent of the Bulletin article is
to discredit the Ministry, and as that is
its regular habit, perhaps nothing else
could be expected.
The Hawaiian gazette., 1888-10-30

A SHORT time ago the Bulletin had
an item about further facilities to be
secured by changes in our postal rela-
tions with the United States. We pub
lish elsewhere a note taken from the
San Francisco Bulletin on the subject
No doubt the amount paid on a single
paper seems very small, and it is; but it
amounts to a good deal in the long run
and people will welcome change look
ing to a cheaper postage. We now pay
two cents on each two ounces or fraction
thereof and it frequently results in put
ting four cents on small parcel. But
the greatest advantage is the probable
increase in the exchange of printed mat
ter. 1t is the universal experience that
cheapening postage increases the ex-
change Of both letters and papers. 1t is
8 good time for the Minister OF Foreign
Affairs to negotiate a new postal treaty.
The Hawaiian gazette., 1888-10-30

with which the party concerns itself are
very important matters, its avowed prin-
ciples take hold Of the very foundations
of government, and it is pledged to the
carrying out into practice of ideas in
which large body OF voters feel deep
and abiding interest. We return then
to our original proposition, that an ina
bility to recognize SO obvious fact or an
unwillingness to acknowledge it, is strong
presumptive evidence OF either defective
intelligence or defective integrity, or both.
With the statement which we actually
made, and not with the one which it
falsely attributed to us, we understand
the Bulletin to be in full accord. 1t is
because the mission Of the Reform party
is not ended, and not likely soon to be,
that our neighbor is so touchy. 1t is be-
cause the predictions of dissension and
disaster, of a factious and recalcitrant
majority in the Legislature, OF Minis
try unable to obtain the support OF their
own party, and breakup Of things gen
orally, which have been put forward so
abundantly and reiterated so bumptiously
for many months past, have been con-
tradicted by facts and proved to be with
out solid foundation, that the very men,
ton OF the Reform party has become SO
"grating and scraping and rasping" to
our neighbor's nerves We propose
from time to time to discuss the record
of the Reform party, the principles on
which we understand it to be based, and
what we believe to be its claims to public
confidence and support. Ii any one finds
this subject too utterly unbearable, if the
q grating and scraping and rasping" SEN
sation produced is beyond his endur
ance, he can either stuff his ears with
cotton, or crawl into an empty vacuum
pan. His presence there would hardly
impair the vacuum to any appreciable
extent.
The Hawaiian gazette., 1888-10-30

In AN article on the future of the Re-
form party, which was published week
or two ago, We took occasion to remark
that "With the sweeping victory at the
general election of 1887 its mission was
not, as few thoughtless people seem to
imagine, and as larger number of evil
disposed people would like to believe, sub
stantially ended" This statement of
an almost self-evident fact the Bulletin
chose to distort into an assertion that
everybody who did not endorse the Re-
form party and its acts, or who differed
from the ADVERTISER in politics, was
either "thoughtless or evil-disposed."
The Bulletin knows better. Therefore,
not for the instruction of that journal,
whose misrepresentation we take to be
wilful, but to clear the matter up in the
minds of any who may happen to have
been befogged thereby, we will offer the
following illustration. The writer of this
article is an American by birth, and in
political sympathy with the Republican
party. He believes the Democratic
party to be the organized representative
OF the worst elements in American poll
tics, and Grover Cleveland huge politi-
cal fraud. But he is not so stupid as to
imagine that any possible outcome of
the pending election is to end the career
OF either the Republican or Democratic
parties. Let Mr.. Cleveland be defeated
ever so overwhelmingly, and the Demo-
cratic party goes on its way the same as
before. And why? Because that party
represents opinions held by a large sec
ton of the American people, it has a
record and a policy concerning live
questions, it embodles ideas and tenden-
cies which, whether we like them or not,
are real and important factors in Ameri-
can politics. For these reasons, and not
because it is right, or sound, or wise, or
pure, the Democratic party exists and is
likely to exist, at least as long as any of
the present generation survive to take
any interest in political matters. The
Democratic party of the United States
represents something, and therefore it
lives. Defeat at six successive presiden-
tial elections failed to break up its organ
ization or destroy its vitality. Our ap-
proval or disapproval of that party has
nothing to do with our recognition and
acknowledgment of the fact of its con-
tinuance. In the same way the Reform
party in Hawaii represents something
and therefore lives and is likely to con-
tinue so to do. 1t represents ideas in
government, and a general
policy in public affairs. which we con-
slder essential to the well-being of the
community. 1t came into existence to
meet crying want, and has pretty
well understood position on most vital
issues of the day. Whether it be right
or wrong is question we are prepared
to discuss at all proper and reasonable
times. But right or wrong, the matters