Lancaster daily intelligencer. [volume] (Lancaster, Pa.) 1864-1928, 1888-03-03


Witness--No when asked him he
said, 'The bill" brought It."
The Attorney GsnerAl-What did II
amount TOT
: witnem-One pound four shillings.
Tho Attorney 0encral--How much Of
the champagne was drunkS
Witness-Half glsss--not moro.
The Attorney Gsnsral--Did the lady
drink any Of herss
Witness-Not any.
The Attorney Gcneral-Did the prisoner
make any remark a. to the amount II the
billi
witness--oh, no; be gave me q SOW
'sThat win do"
; Tho Attorney General-Meaning that
yuu could keep the changef
Witness-I took II 20, and hc said
nothing.
Tho Attorney General--A good Gus
tomeri
witness-A very good customer. Not
many such.
The Attorney General-without a
murmur or . remark, the prisoner paid
you thirty shillings for half o glass Of
witness-That is so. It was, cs say,
surprising. did not forget is.
The Attorney General--It was not
circumstance to forget. You soy that tho
lady who accompanied tho prisoner did
not remove her cloak or veil. Was that
tho case tho whole Of tho time sho was In
the room!
witness-rhe Whole Of the time.
Tho Attorney Gencral-Her gloves
did she wear those tho whole Of tho timci
Witness-But, no. remember once
seeing her hand ungloved.
Tho Attorney Genernl-Hcr right or
left handi De particular in your answer,
sary. My object Is to ascertain whether
the Indy was married, end wore wedding
ring. :.
Witness Qsmiling)-3ut o wedding ring
matters not. Those wear them who are
not married. A
Tho Attorney General-Reply to my
question. Was It her right or her left
hand which you saw ungloved'
Witness--I cannot remember.
I Tho Attorney Generality.
Witness-It il Of no use. cannot re-
member.
The Attorney General you remem-
ber whether 1t was u small o. largo
handi
Witness-1t was small white hand.
Tho Attorney General-The hand, pre-
sumably, Of ladyf
Witness-Or Of q member Of the then
ire. = Who can .telli We thave many
such.
The Attorney General-were there rings
upon her ilngerss
Witness-T observed one of turquoises
The Attorney Gencral--was It a ring
with any particular setting by which it
could be identified
Witness-A ring set with diamonds and
turquoises. That is an know.
The Attorney General-Would you
recognize it again II you saYit'
witness-I cannot say. think not.
did not particularly remark II.
The Attorney General-Did you remark
the color of her glovesS
Witness-They were black gloves.
The Attorney General-Of kids
Witness-Yes, Of kid.
The Attorney General--At what time
did the prisoner and his companion leave
the restaurant!
witness-It must have been about 10.
The Attorney General-Why do you
say ''It must have been about 1921
Witness--Because l did not see them
The Attorney General-You can, how
ever, fix the time within few minutes.
Witness--Oh, yes. At 11:45, rs near as
can remember, / had occasion to 60
down stairs. When / returned, after
three or four minutes, monsieur and mad
am were gone.
The Attorney General-Werc you aware
| that they had a carriage waiting for them'
Witness--Only that heard SO. ! did
| not see it.
CThe witness was then briefly cross-ex-
| amined by the prisonerl
| Prisoner-You say that you saw me
| enter the restaurant from tho street, and
that / asked you il could have supper in
private room'
Witness-That Is 3d.
Prisoner-Did you show me into pri-
vate room2
Witness-Yes.
Prisoner-where other persons could
not enterf
witness-Oh, no; II was a room for six
or eight persons.
Prisoner--During the time was there
did you attend to other persons besides me.
Witness-Ycs.
Prisoner-The room was not strictly
privatef
Witness--As private as have said.
Prisoner-What was the first thing
did when went to the table you pointed
out to mel
Witness-You removed your overcoat.
Il wan wet with rain; and 1t surprised ms
that madam did not remove hers, whtcl
was also wet with rain.
Mr.. Justice Fenmore--Do not make re
marks. Simply answer the questions pu
70 you.
| Witness-Yes, my lord.
Prisoner-What did I do with the over
coat when I had taken 1t offf
Witness-You hung 1t up behind you
PrisOner-On peg in the walls
Witness-Yes.
Prisoner-Was this peg quite close +
the table at which sat9
Witness-No, it was at little distance
Prisoner--At the back Of nes
Witness-Yes.
Prisoner-Did I put the overcoat o
before left the room,
Witness-Yes.
Mr.. Justice Fenmore-You have sal
in examination that you did not see tn
prisoner and his companion leave tn
room.
Witness-But when I returned afte
being away for three or four minutes
monsieur was gone and the coat was ala
gone.
.Prisoner-Then you did not see me pr
on the overcoat,
Witness-No.
Prisoner-I have nothing moro to as
you.
Re-examined-Woul you be able
recognize the overcoat which the prison'
| worel
Witness--Oh, yes; 1t was remarkabl
Tho Attorney Generals this Il
ulster produced)
Witness-Yes; it is the same.
At this stage the court adjourned 4
| luncheon.
/ A