The Hawaiian gazette. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1865-1918, 1888-10-30

returns a verdict of not guilty, three dis
senting.
The King VS.. Pans Tuen Char. At
torney-G General C. W. Ashford and V. V.
Ashford for the Crown; w. a. Whiting
for defendant. Conspiracy, second de-
gree. The following jury is sworn :
Harry Armitage, John A. Spear, E. w.
Jordan, John NJ. Dowsett, W. f. Bates,
George E. Howe, Frank Gertz, Charles
Lucas, J. W. Gibbs, H. G. Crabbe, GA.
| Meth, and Hermann Focke. At BIS p.
m. Mr.. Whiting addressed the jury, fol-
lowed at 8 10 by Mr. V. V. Ashford, and
at 8 :33 by the Court with its charge, the
jury retiring at 8 As to consider its YER
dict. At IS 81 verdict of guilty, three
jurors dissenting, is returned. Mr..
Whiting notes exceptions and gives no
tice of motion for new trial; also gives
notice OF motion for arrest Of judgment,
on the ground of jurisdiction, there being
no such place known to the law as the
District OF Kona, Island OF Oahu.
divorce Division. Aiona (Ch.) vs..
Malaea (w.) a. Rosa tor plaintiff. Pc
tition for divorce on the ground of deser-
ton. Defendant admitting that the
evidence presented by plaintiff is true,
the Court at 4 is p. m. grants the divorce
for desertion.
Kahananui VS.. Kahananui. Continued
from previous dates, further heard, and
at 5 :l5 pm. again continued indefinitely.
AT CHAMBERS. = BEFORE MR.. JUSTICE
BICKERToN.
Intermediary Division. B. Guerrero
VS.. George Markham. Kaulukou for
defendant. Appeal from Police Court,
Honolulu. Plaintiff appellant not APP
pearing, the Court orders appeal dis
missed.
e. Ward VS.. c. B. Wood. Creighton
for plaintiff; Castle for defendant.
Damage. Appeal from Police Court,
Honolulu. Heard, argued, and judg-
ment of lower Court in favor of plaintiff
for $l25 confirmed.
FRIDAY, Oct. 26.
The Court opens at 10 :06 a. m. foreign
jurors in attendance. Noon recess IL 81
a. IN. to lis p. m, and at 4:50 F. m.
adjourns for the day.
Criminal Division. The King versus
Tomis ct al Attorney-General G. w.
Ashford for the Crown; J L. kaulukou
for the defendants. Gaming. Defend
ants appeal from Police Court, Homo
lulu. New trial, jury having disagreed
at July term. Tried before a foreign
jury. Verdict for defendants, one Juror
dissenting.
Divorce Division. Avail (Ch.) versus
Mary Ana wv S. K. Kane for plaintiff;
defendant per Sc. Partly heard and
continued till tomorrow.
Law Division. T. Ahung versus Ng
San Kee. V. V. Ashford for plaintiff;
no appearance of or for defendant. As
sumpsit Clerks certificate of default of
defendant to answer being filed, judy
ment is ordered entered
Kanaloa ct al. VS. Union Mill Co. ct
al. W. c. Achi for plaintiffs; w. o.
Smith and A. Rosa for defendants.
Ejectment. Plaintiffs motion for new
trial overruled and exceptions noted to
ruling.
Kahelemauna (k.) VS.. Keamalu (k) |
S. K. Kane for plaintiff; A. Rosa for |
defendant. Replevin. Plaintiffs mo-
ton for new trial overruled and excep- |
tons taken to the ruling
AT CHAMBERS. - BEFORE MIR. JUSTICE |
BICKERToN.
Equity Division. Castle & Cooke VS.. |
W o. Smith. W. R. Castle fer plain
tiffs; w. o. Smith and Gardner Wilder
for defendant. Bill in equity for a speci- |
tic performance, praying that defend
ant, assignee in bankruptcy of A. F. |
Cooke, endorse over to plaintiffs certain
shares of stock in the Haiku Sugar Co.
pledged to them as a security for $12 ,000 |
In former replevin suit at law, the de-
PENDANT, being then the plaintiff, recov
cred judgment in his favor for the pos
session of said shares, which were not
endorsed by the bankrupt. said A. F.
Cooke. The question involved in this
case is one unprecedented in this Court,
as to whether or not a specific perform
ance will lie against an assignee in bank
ruptcy. After arguments the case was
--latest Court news on page 81.