The Seattle post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1888-07-12
THE TERRITORY.
Meeting Of Tacoma City
Council.
wnrrx ssrAIss 4 new rxIAI


racvrs. July iis--The efsy esssneIi bid
!. ,rssssnr meeting feasxhs Hessslatlsfzs
= tt,r ia pyvsnraent ~ streets wxsx psse<=s
- fp5Ivws; sensa Esessash fsrsa \ % !.
ao.th E<ssuseeush sfszys ressee aFansss 70
n. s4,rsf frosn I,isfsssn ssenas 10 -s,aff
9~rutsrst: ssagr s<~st fsssn ssessad %
s1ssyd. St,rsks I; % westerly Hsaffs-
nSst,gvfssas were psssssx - psaas aolfseh
epurrr On sInth stre*s fsnm fsksfsA ave.
me 4, C stsess, ash on xarfh sseassa sssssf
1rpm Tsensna avenue 10 z, asss sf'esies sa
ak< Sound
rHx HuxyS~a or eFrxI-
4 rssnr4nsus from residents al fsffersth
sas<es against ssFxi icing thrown ssasrs
nrDyokea discussion If this sexesi question:
CoftfbX surxessed rassIag deep exasvs.
nton il tsze Middle Of The sepsi section %
eke .sush. ana hasing the afFsa duaPes
1A1Ye. with the requirement. that u be ksi'f
erxofe8 With esTsh-
f}felss sugzessssf tssat seas b aEsilE and
ogEssl carried % deep wafsr aud dumped.
IiIlls suggested q efEss stslfy
Mayor fsrssfs tH9n&ht the rsHtfef should
~ 0ftsft,sin,ss now. ard seemed 10 fasoT A
l1ffeh II. III. rfs1as,i eaetsfas as the safssp pes
srsgi sassSsf ufscfssefffoisafse n was fefHtrsd
~ eofhsasssee. a resa9nsfratsse Was sisd
neasuxt improvement ~ EtesestA sffNef On
ne xrnansf thai the petition had tasn
ehsnessf X ssreff t4fsx eYased aHd n
sfrres inserted alter sise signatures hasa hera
afIred as.d f<fansf Eeaapa aud fresayrs-
9fap sfsssreh tsrsIfaffF had he9si siEiass fsif
~ iaaissiuai members sf The respective
bparSs without proper Authority
H. Hangiffasl stated ihst ne had seefs
III sa4ffies signing with regard % tbs
ehauvn ~ ~ street. All were fayofshles
AZ tlss sufssssssr on demonstrators did nos
sfFerf tfe validity ~ the petition, the re-
WoBsfsHnee sas Laid on the tsfsse-
rHg cost oF err HsTEs.
The frs and Rsser committee reported
Fl fagaf sf A. fsfF nnsssssn ~ flsN proper
nrnre faf zach city ksdfauts, ilisiead ~
q SO. ~ proposed b tbs company.
EseeIe ofijeetss b. the report. There we're
norae forty snch hsdFRtlfs IN the city. he
cid, net fnore than two Of which weFs
ever fisesf sssas We had no sewers 10 AHsh
and practically ha4 fotase iof e isgsifa1fs
except Ia eass 81 IRE. which seldom et'cuf'
ri He thought II wasid be aa outrage
~ the eitY 10 Taf more than TIE Present
snte 81 81 lie said he was a fEsetatcr of
8he committee and had act bfs<n Invited 10
thr meesings. asid kHsw nothing of this
report
steele H. attend the meetings. and sasd
thai the committee had investigated aud
ltund the rate paid Ia other cities sshEsd
lfufn CLIO 10 SIS.
CaughfHa made IL the oecesi0a IT, give
Steele lecture on eos.Hc1lsaanje duty. aud
Tho Necessity ~ attending committee
meeflngs, and said that he should present
8 minority report II be- did NOT Ike the
majority report
riceie feiorted that he kne~ his dafy
aniie as well M the gentleman from the
Second waFd and attended 10 IL quite rs
fnishiusis. though perhaps not With his
fcaHghran's5 ability. The report was
adopted
TITO same committee reported 10 favor Of
contracting with the light and wafer com
Sany for two years al the present rate for
HIGHT, provided the company extend arc
Nights ~ the city may Wish.
eORnEnArEb ssas nru.nfsa IN fHEsffKg
IINfTe
The sasne committee reported against
permitting petitioner building a eofru.
9ased-ifon structure on Pacific avenue
within The Gre limits near the depot
j. u. Hongfton ehasaplansd the petition,
declaring that no harm cunld result, and
u would be doing The petitioner good turn
and the public a benefit. lie charged
Iiiiis With not having the neral courage
10 stand up fnf al exceptional case
The council Was equally divided and the
report WAS not adopted nor the priftleg.
granted Al, ordinance was reported pro
viasaa for a general system 81 sewerage,
bids wsfs opened for all proposed ssrsset
improvements aud referred 20 y committee
and the council adjourned with eonsideTAs
bic unfinished business until saturday