The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1888-10-02

| n 0VEMBER 70.
67-John A. Groesbeck vs.. Geor ge A
Mears.
74-Same VS.. same.
NOVEMBER q.
167-Martin Correll vs.. n. Treweek
. ct al.
10Y anne VS.. same.
113-Frank E. James ct al. VS.. N
Treweek ct al.
| 114-Same VS.. same.
NOVEMBER %.
1C9-M. Dusseldorf ct al, vs.. John ]
Daily.
110-Same VS.. same.
122-Frank Mclaughlin VS.. John j.
Daily ct al.
| 123-Same VS.. same.
NOVEMBER 90.
160-Echo G. Park City Railway Co.
VS.. w. ]. Snyder ct al.
NOVEMBER 80.
13O-Daniel N. Swan vs.. Old Jordan
Mining and Milling Co.
DECEMBER 3.
176 - William Glassman vs.. Mary
O'Donne'l.
177-Thomas Pells ct al. VS.. South
Galena Consolidated Mining Company.
DECEMBER 4.
178-JOhn A. Hughes VI. Scott Hill
Mining Company.
179-Same VS.. Same.
lS0-John Sleger VS. Scott Hill Min
ing Company.
DECEMBER 5.
1Sl-EdTari Rotch VS.. A. n. Hamil-
ton ct al.
1872. M. Goodwin vs.. A. N. Hamil-
ton.
DECEMBER 6.
Wasatch Mining Company VS..
Joseph A. Jennings.
1S7-Charles II. Toll VS.. l. J. Star
buck ct al.
1SO-Theodore Burmester VS.. George
W. Carter.
DECEMBER Z.
19i-L. P. Kelsey VS.. w. J. Crowther.
219-Joseph A. Bent, Jr., VS.. Cyrus
B. Kelley.
DECEMBER 20.
COL. c. Cone ct al. VS.. Esther
Petit ct al.
226-James Hawks vs.. G. A. North
ct al.
DECEMBER u.
13-samuel G. Sheldon VS.. James L
Ellison ct al.
HOWARD o. SPENCER,
arraigned on an Indictment charging
him with the murder of Sergeant Pike,
entered plea of not guilty.
CHARLES NoKEs, s.G-
of South Jordan, charged with unlaw-
full cohabitation, entered a plea of
guilty, and will appear for sentence on
the Goth.
DR.. oRMsBY PLEADS GUILTY.
At 2 o'clock, DR.. o. O. Ormsby en-
tered court and pleaded guilty to unl4w-
full cohabitation. He Will be sentenced
on the 10Th.
THE NUISANCE CASE.
The demurrer to the indictment in
the case of Aaron Keyser, charged with
nuisance, was sustained
and the Indictment dismissed, the
grounds being that the instrument was
defective.
THE KELLER MURDER CASE,
An open venire for twenty special
Jurors was issued at II o'clock, and
when the court reconvened at 2 the
score of victims were present awaiting
their turn. A jury, however, was
secured without any great trouble,
neither side exhausting the number al
lowed them under the law. The defend
ant was represented by Mr.. Critchlow.
while Mr.. Clarke looked after the inter-
ests Of the government in the matter.
Sitting near the defendant was his wife,
a care worn looking woman, with child
in her arms, and near her sat three
other children, two boys and little
girl, thu latter apparently being very
interested listener TO the proceedings
during the time she was not
busily engaged in keeping the
younger children in order. Keller
himself manifested no particular |
smiling blandly when a
witness made statement that he did
not appear to entirely agree with, and |
very frequently promptingthis attorney.
A jury having been secured, Mr.. |
Clarke made the opening statement of
WnaC Ine prosecution expected 10 prove.
The story, in substance, was to the eff
feot that in 1871 Maurice Livingston
kept saloon in STOCKTON. In May of
that year, Wade Badgeily, a young
man about 24 years Of age, went into
the saloon, where he met Keller; a
quarrel ensued and scuffis followed
Livingston endeavored to stop the af-
fray. when Keller ordered him away.
informing him that it was none of his
id business Or words TO that effect.
At this point Keller's wife, with
a baby in her arms, ran into
the saloon and begged her husband
to have no trouble. Badgerly backed
way and soon after Keller shot. KEEL
Ter came out with gun in his hand
and made remark that he hal done
the son of b--h up. Badgerly ut
tered no word after he fell-save some
thing about his mother-and this was
unintelligible .Keller's only explana-
ton was to the effect that Badgerly had
been endeavoring to get his wife away
from him. Kellar was arrested and
brought to this city, where he was in
dicted, but by some hocus-pocus of
Tom Fitch the Indictment was declared