Springfield daily republic. [volume] (Springfield, O. [Ohio]) 1887-1888, 1888-05-12
TWO POINTS OF WARNING
SUGGESTED IN CONNECTION WITH
LOUISA M. AlCOTT'S CAREER.

SUGGESTED IN CONNECTION WITH
LOUISA M. ALcoTT'S CAREER.
Why Was So Valuable n Life Cut on So
Early?-Excess of Toil-Expenditures
and Income-LThe Perils of Abundant
Work.
1t Is rare to see a woman who, IL tried
by her op standard and that of those
Immediately around her, has led nobler
or more completely satisfactory life than
Louisa Alcott. BIT since we ought never
to be satisfied either with ourselves or
with anybody else, and since one Of the
chief uses of the study of fine character
is to discover wherein it could be yet
finer, there is always lesson to
be drawn from the very limitations
of each career The finest thought
ever expressed by Howells, l think, is
where he suggests that success itself may
perhaps seem very much like failure, seen
from the inside; and there are few emf
nent persons, probably, SO sunk in conceit
that they could not afford to others GER
tain warnings as well as examples from
their own achievements. The obituaries
usually miss such warnings; indeed, they
are apt TO turn expressly away from them
and think it little ungenerous to draw
them, the consequence being that such
obituaries are as valueless as an inscrip-
ton on monument, and, like that, re-
duce all character to q level of common
place and conventional virtue. There are,
perhaps, but two points OF warning, or
even of limitation, that need to be sug-
gested In connection with Miss Alcott's
brilliant career, but each Of these is OF
some weight.
First it is fair to ask why this valuable
life was cut off so early-at 50 instead of
So, this last being her fathers term Of
years Was it not because she burned the
candle too desperately, while his burned
calmly and at times even feebly' OF late
years she has suffered repeatedly, it is
stated, from nervous prostration and other
disorders coming from excess Of work.
She never had any leisure; she was always
overworked Grant that this evil came
largely from those exacting demands of
admirers and correspondents which have
been more than once pointed out in these
columns, and which make 1t often hard
for really useful life to prolong itself
But | suspect there was another reason,
which seldom fails to tell upon successful
authors The late Mr.. James 7. Fields
once told me that he asked Charles Reade,
when at the height of his fame, "Why do
you give us no more of those delightful
shorter tales like Peg Wellington and
Christie Johnstone,' ON which your fame
was first foundedsr Because" said
Reade, simply, Il cannot now afford it,"
NVha,, he corn po ro ivaly rnnr ap5 nv
known he could write masterpieces; when
he had achieved fame and fortune, and
acquired the habits shat come with these
he no longer had the leisure to write them
1t is the same with health, time, and life
itself. The young girl who earns IS by
her first published story has an immense
sense of wealth; let her cherish it, for she
will probably never feel so rich again. As
rule, if you earn $500 year, you spend
it; if you earn $1,000 year, your stand
ard of expenditures almost invariably ex-
pands to match it; and for the most part,
the more money one earns, the harder il
is to take vacation. This applies to
those who spend money selfishly, but it
applies with tenfold force to those who
are generous.
When the writer was planning In the
Vi lDOl W tIlliSt TtRluleuI
the civil war; il occurred to him to invite
the celebrated John B. Cough to go as
chaplain, since his personal magnetism
and eloquence, althouss: he was not
clergyman, would lie felt through the
whole Union army. On inquiry it turned
out that Mr.. Cough was absolutely fef
tered by his own large earnings and pro
fuse charities, he could easily earn $50 or
800 day the year round by lecturing.
hut all this large income was mortgaged
in advance to young men whom he was
educating and poor families whom he was
supporting so that he absolutely could
not afford to stop work for moment.
Had he been poorer, he could have gone.
So when one reads of Miss Alcott's coming
into the Office Of The Woman's Journal.
and bringing 800 that she had earned
before breakfast one is led to ask whether
Ii would not have been better not to have
earned it than to give it away so lavishls
as to have to go to work after breakfast
for another 500, instead of taking day
off and letting the tired brain rest. 1t is
the last lesson ever learned by writers
and artists to be wisely economical Of
and TO spare the sources from
which prosperity and usefulness too easily
flow.
The other lesson goes deeper. Miss Al
colts intellectual work itself found a
limitation in its grade by reason of its
ready abundance She had the ear of her
public; she was, as was said Of her, "a
bencfactor of households" and perhaps
she did-it is impossible to prove the con-
trary-the very highest work of which
she was capable. But it was not very
high or very permanent; she never
equaled her first successful work of fic-
ton, and for the rest Of her life, as in the
case of Bret Harte, she simply repeated
the same few delineations. They were, of
course, more innocent and healthful than
Harte's, put they were as monotonous;
doubtless, continued TO cry for
them, but no maturer reader-at least
none familiar with Northumberland to
keep the run Of them. Her muse was do
mestic, simple and sociable; the instinct
of art she never had 1t is difficult to
imagine her as pondering situation
deeply, still less as concerning herself |
about phrase or dictiOn. In this she was
curiously unlike Helen Jackson, who was
an artist by nature and by habit, and who
was able to write Ramona" so rapidly
that it seemed an improvisation, because
she had learned the use of her tools be-
W. Higginson in Harper's Ba-