Seattle daily post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1888-03-07
ZEE DRzwIso OF DEEDS.


!, tAA&fKks&Ee4 fE9r< 10 NAN
ckxcfks-soNE INSTANCES.
i fsha MISTER o. sAsiy sssou,uk.usrs /.
msse ea.svvv tie Erps esresesnss prne
uSs y the rrspasssies Of pspers fsv IN
tnssfer of resi- essAis and esker Proper
ts<& said . ssntienaz yss--csy wbes<
basisss Involves fAs vex-ixs ana ersssnl
ssamfaastoa u rapsss fied Tor record /.
Re e0rnfy saaft0xs efsce IL . cnsy =
ssnats Proportion of the deeds which evi.
| oper care In tte4r prtparssson
ssay dsets ~nsch woaid siand the ~
y hS sfc so ca<sfessay asd shabkiis
snaf thsy invite . lAwsat ss1
a 49,. = mAny Ct them wisi evess1aliy
nsus = tsweusss. wsea eSscxne0 = ~
ascst On o. oosncssy lines = ceass g
osJscs Thee are to rass Ia which
pspsfn ma - d-ssn and re stani ~.
-. q te%. Cns which Q On . caDt -
~ - sus<nxned aad sncshsr Which :
-, ps.n sf'd dss<irst In sss fsrns thai
~ % hsesS esen soa5a Fos& bly sssss. -Tae
sS-xts made b. 20 : rasu who A. a.
eosse 70 "a acs their bssf y o. loosely 4.
IN tnses I'll righs. III bot s5s Fss rc<
tnAa thAs pscsf wo.id b, hsid R1od 81
say ee1ft be papers prple sboala
nsse Sc those which the courts win sew
cf pe asked TO pas uecn@
a
nave 10 nsn6f was asked.
rev dsJs ssc two Of the dssis nled
Sefr Ter sane p epeyty. esis tia eur
chescr In the frss d-cs rxs the graft in
ms ssccn1 eesf. The dates in The ccsds
snoTe1 HAT the RrAntor in the second
Nso ? No sctuA ~ Owned IL. Such In.
stances. While net very numerous. orcur
fe1nentfy enough TO con vince rasny that
hefe ApresSs - be NJ limit 70 the siup d
! OF soae people who think they can
draw legal instruments. triy tbs o.hrs
aAy. IN the as@ixnsseft Of mortgage The
ssssxnuirnt va. aceEroiug 10 It's date
ara now e1xef before . notary pubIic
aesfly fhfcs nscnihs before tho s-si9u-
msht was actin siis made. Such errors
esBaos hs sfsrtont Is poor penrn ansfip.
isr be dates lave referred TO are die
10. 20 you fad the writing la deeds
AS general thing the writing is iexi-
Die except Ia ssxnatuTes. A great mans 1
pcopfe sgn iheir names very ilIexlby.
insfe ~ ns fuc yen know. FIR the spesl- |
Tag OF pr per nam q. 30 that the context |
81 I'll shord no AID In making them out |
People can's Be too careful about writing |
thsir names. The danger lies IN the fac |
mat II the names are not written dis |
tnctly tbs co1n;y nns ifor Ar DIS IL diff1cuit 1
70 index them accurately. The auditor il |
CURED d the signature written BIZ the
srantor not By tbs name written Ia the 4
body OF The deed. aithoaxh the latter /
someiimss sf 5ds a eius to an iliegihle 1
Signature. sonelimes. however. the msn /
. az wrote the q ed wrot more iilexib L
ban he grantor Then, the auditor sini- /
piy dce- the bet h. can. There sfe Sou Q |
men who seem 70 think thas The more |
2 surish . they maze the fiaer Is their |
pcemanship. These men seem more dis |
20 ed 70 make n3urishcs when III are /
writing signatures than ~ other times.
W ben these fellows work with O "a aa L
'sh5 can't sign his OVID name legibly. |
hon the pab.is .a:fsrs. Hut there 10 ono /
more objection =
What Ia hair
now refer to tbs descriptions OF prop /
ert,cs = great many sf them are /
srstcheffy sreioss and inaccurate. |
ave seen deeds In which the property
might have bseu almost anywhere In |
King couasy. Tho place ef bsgsnsing
was linda iinltc. A frequent instance OF /
.sreisssnnss IL to describe Q tract By |
nstes aud bounds without indicating the /
number os the section Ia which the land |
= located. although IL IL possible TO de- |
lermine the location Of ths prooarty
Then IN the description OF city properties
not safre9asntly lot IL described by
neses and bounds, but the numbsr OF the
OF 10 not given. although reference IL
IN nany deods the Numbers OF tie lots
IRE given ia figures only. when they
should b. written. The transfer of real
STATE should NOT D. stripped OF reason
able amount OF fofmAlsty. but now the |
Y ndency seems 10 be 10 reduce tbs form
81 deed 10 nameA descriptions and slg
aatures