The Stark County Democrat. [volume] (Canton, Ohio) 1833-1912, 1888-11-15
Legal Notices.
Legal Notice.

NN"iNN hNNHHi s'H"N"i
Mary Condy q al, Defendants,
Mary Condy, tho unknown heirs Of Mary Condy,
Ann Cendy the unknown heirs 0f Ann COndY Prod
efick A, Ptdt tho unknown heirs Of Frederick =.
ptot Ahmuol Hitchcock, the unknown holfa ~ AAln'
uol Hitchcock, James Patterson, the unknown hclfa
heirs of James duncan, will take notice that ON tho
l7lh day OF October tti the plaintiff nlrd MS pc
ttl0n against the above nhintd lutohlhna hnI plh.
ora IN the OnicO Oi fho Clerk NJ Common Pleas Court
OF stark county ohio, setting forth that no "A the
ownor ~ Fee OF 10y No, one tl, ~ shown on w plM
Of the village OF haymre n sald county g, . sE@th @
been tho owners " said premises IN feo alnplo oon-
tnuouay tlAoo April 2bth 1903 that on February
lth, 1910 said lQl was cenNeyol 70 JphA,hhh VonuA
that thereafter while tho 0wnpf OF Hald lot nAld
Jonathan Condy died, leaving Mary uOndy hnd Ann
oOndy his only heirs ~ lhw thht nAld Ann ana Mary
COndy April a0th, iHll, executed ana delivered 70
him Aii their interest In said promises but said deeds
were never filed with tho loqorlcr Of SAID county,
nor recorded leaving link In tho chnn OF tho tito
10 said promaea that thereafter raid lot was owned
IN fec by Isaac n0naAll, that no conveyed tho Same
10 James Duncan, who IN turn conveyed the hAmc W
Richard uOe but by tho neglect OF tho said Goo MS
said deed was NJ no tmo put on the records OF STARK
county leaving another LINK IN the chain ol said uuc
70 mnd lot HAd petition further tcollcn tlg several
grantOra and grantees OF tho said lot through whom
the title thereof came 10 this palntiij ANA further
reccs that hl OF said parties AN0 hold open, not0-
rlous and undapllqd possession 9l nall piomlsns
from 1907 and until The nllng Of tlle pelton also
that while Henry urlbol Zone Of ihu nMuegthfough
whom planiif claims was tho owner OF said l0t) he
oxOcutod % mortgage decd 0f the same 70 Samuel
Hitchcock aud Frederick 4, Poet 70 secure tho pay
ment VI one thousand dollars that said m0rirnge
was after oard paid by said urOcl aud was satisfied
aud discharged but that no record OF hu0h tntstho-
tl0n aud discharge was ever nude ON tho mortgage
record OF stark county tho petition further foollos
thai while william Kline another one 0f the pAftea
through whom plaintiff claims was thu ownor OF thlu
lot No executed u pretended mortgage OF tho sane
10 James Patterson, pretending to urcufo tho pny.
mont OF elb7lOO, Tint Naid mortgage was dated
May -, 1919, and was duo heplomhur lbiol lnai We
same was false and fraudulent ANA wA lntondol 70
hinder aud delay tho creditors iiQm collecting thclr
lust claimsl that said moilghHc was without any
confederation whatever Tho petition nfnyH that tho
plRuun may pe decipcd TO DO The solo owner OF said
iOl sfA6 nom any norOgl ueftln OF any or MI tho
defendnnia nnmcdi IN said petition, That Mary COndy
and Ann uOnly, or thulr unknown heirs, ANA James
Duncan with Ills unknown hOlit, hn ordered hnd 10,
creed 10 convey 20 tho plnnlH n their lntero9A In
within day named, that the decree W this Court
may operate ~ such conveyance VI thd lot that tho
defendants and their unknown heirs ho forever on
Joined from clAlulng any Right or 70 said prom-
lsos tint tho said mortgage IRON Henry urllol 70
Frederick e. pcut aud Samuel Hitchcock ho found
TO bO fully pald and hO dOorcOd cancelled on tho
record and dschntgcd thnt the mortgage from
william Kline 10 Jnmca Patterson hO declared raise
and fraudulent without considerations, aud bo or
plnlntli'a title, na In said petition moro iully tot
Ioflh may be- removed, and ho hu gnlOtod IN tho
same aud for all proper relief TO which ho ~ entitled
10 In tie promises,
sald petition viii bc for hearing ON aud after tho
BOth day OF November, 1854 ..,-..
GEORGE LUCAS, Plaintiff
October 10Th, iss9.l0.Lw