Reporter and farmer. [volume] (Webster, Day County, Dakota [S.D.]) 188?-1946, 1888-11-15
The Punsrs IN the saskrrIIn ease.

LoSBoX Nov 6-The papers in the Sack
vile case we're maize Dubiic tins evening. The
arst IL a letter from Lord Salisbury ra Lord
Sickville, and 10 dated Oct II Ii il as
ioii0wss
Mr.. PRsIps, who IL staying ut my h0Use, in
forms me that Mr.. BaYariis request for yanr
rpeail IN m8E hnzet upun the letter TO MGrVhi-
son, but 1pou a newspaper interview 1 re-
psied shat { WIS glad m was o true that
the rei;uesE vas due TO the wriTing Of the
letter, whah Wis made public only by a be-
rrayll of enuh Ieurs. and II was hardly prze-
tieahis to lay down the prInripis that a
GipiomatIG representative ahoulG be
prohibited rom expressing. even privately,
any opinion HVou events passing m
the country TO which he IN ascretibea The
Iang7uGge az an interview II different. You
must in taken as having intended iG for pub
H~rItiOu. EsfGrp admitting the need f8c a
recall, I was bound in jusuise to ysu 10 know
exactly WHAT Fie obieeri0nal language was
{ therefore lsketf Mr.. Pha;ps for a cBpy OF
the interview IN order to ascertain rom you
whether you had been accurately reported,
amt I todd him that I would then bring the
natter before my colleagues Mr. Phelps r-
/ piled thar he llut not r~eeeivet the taxt OF the
interview, but would take steps Co procure
m. II was cOEseguHn5lY understood Hna5 uEs-
til the copy WIS rsesivsd there should be no
answer TO the request for tine recuL
ON O"t - Lord Safkville sem the follow
inu eBm muuirariou 10 Ldrd Salisbury:
The Ritter was a PoIiUicai Republican plot
I have nIailed an explanation The plot WIS
due to the approaching election r. my re-
sal il demanded, I beg to express deep rsgrgs
nj what has sreuFreE
0I the 30=h Lord sack willie enhlrd that he
had received a passport. On the 3lsJ Mr.
Pheips informed Lord Salisbury that the
United States government had alvpu Lord
Siraviile a E~ssHp0ru. and added that Prgsi-
1a.EE N,..EH-.E 5000 NFn~ unArt.. 49,
wGuEi be sens TO Washington. Oz the same
day Lord siissvilIs sent the following dis-
| patch co Lord Salisbury
1 beg to reEuiIahe Mr.. BGyIri7s sElremsnt
Of the o for my dismissal IA fan uniunt
autaGk on my mtegriuy-
Lord Salisbury at once sent the following
reply
Place Mr. Herbert a. senior secretary on
the spot. IN eh.Trga Of the leGsution-
On WOW I Lnru Salisbury in a eummHni-
cation 90 Mr. Phelps, reierrpd to his promise
TO furnish him with a cops Of the Sackville
Interview ana Informed him that M he hai
nc fIrrhsr infDrmauion ~ 20 what Lord Snrk-
Ville's srBtsmsnts contained. orr whom they
were mazte, he was unabia to form any
Judgement upon the considerations whigh Gir-
tafsst the request for the recall, or the for
wardinr OF q passport. To this, on the
next day Nj. Phelps made reply ~ follows.
Our recollection OF what pasaea in the con-
II NtTNsilAAA w AaAAA tai EAaAhastI ula1rEf rfl2iAtN
in one parrirular. IT Intended that the letter
should have no part in the reasons fsr the
request for the recall OF Lord snekvilis. I
did say thar the minister's remarks GU the
! published interview wPre the principal rsn-
\ sDn- am stilf without a copy Of the inter-
view. Uhaye sent t1 Mr. Bayari a eopy OF
your l0riship's note requesting full sesails
Of the EangTsars and circumstances.
A letter wrirtsr by Lord Saekvills 0cG. 80,
was received by Lord Salisbury on the ttE,
INST. r. e-neI0aes the MaFghison letter and
his reply 20 n. He Says
have certain information that the Mr.
| rhiagn letter was concerted BY n we'd known,
firm IN conjunction Wit the Republican com
mirree n View York. III was sent from south
srn California to prevent suspicion. Mr. Bay
ard whom / saw to-day. said he rsgreUued the
iEcidsnt very muPh. He accepted my DIS
eiaimer Of any Thought or intention to inter
fere with the domestic policy Of the country
He said 10 was a campaign traps but he rank
Iy Gold me that I had been indiser-at- TEX
pressed my deep regre5, sad Mr. Bayard as
! surgsi me- be bore me- M ID viii
The impression prevails in London that
Lord Salisbury " rsserVing any IN
I tended rRfgrgnea to che -siekvilln
Incident for the ministerial banquet, which
| takes place at Guild Half on FRIDAY next.
! Thus far he has declined TO make any state.
msnt regarding the matter Tor publication
He viii Ehen daubtisss feel il ueessaary 10 say
something about il, as what he
feels and the course he Intends 90 pursue
concerning the i~ncisieuE IL awaited with a
good deal Of interest The official pa
Dsrs, which we're puBiishet containing tine
correspondence between the dismisse,f
minister and the premier afford conclusive
evidauee Of what was susperssd all along.
that rlie mudile wSs EaFgaty due to tAa
neglect Of both sides to Use the eable fresfy.
and have q prop srunderstandinGimnnsiia
after the occurrence II sS,snns thar q miaun-
ders1andiug wa the result Of this neglect.
The enmhsuatF eahIe hal would noe have
sxerettai gle.