New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1887-03-04

though Garland had refused to bring suit in another
$ Oilers SCI Interested maas carana n %e eUr
General and easa n, him to
and In acting for company generally vas SO slow that
@ eos on that o sSuS 3. l %
20 iazy,p $50, Mar. IA, TT. 5. But he Afterwards
consentd 4 suit brought In name Of anotner com.
Tho matter with Coode to act in his absence 49,
Sept 80 IT, H. 10. r. alt Of July gou9s BsnS S
understanding that Coode would order suit at once
yses to rsa The s@e With
assent, previous application was withdrawn fon'
Company "a and National improved Company entered
into written contract to begin suit IN naino Ok
anence. but being kent in background while the other
company would appear as applicant and attorneys Oh
1G S Gu he SaTn xsa ss
OFT Bill be nled in name Of usitsd States %as
S5@ sssn p s app sdns o by s e
Goodo returned from absence and Garland convenient
ca afpar as % ., paaers and evidence after 10 one
hos day pretended 60 examine them and A., author
e and ordered nex st a IN n5 june o T Br
away of in Memphis: by II. McCorrey, pistriet,At.
Gariand's interviews with Young and Interview. OF
Young and Van Benthuysen with Goode. PARTS
son' No reference was had to Patent onre
held proper in other Like cases no plausible fsaS9m ~
matter so important without knowledge Oh Els
superior. Garland.
THE EXPOSURE COMES.
THE TRIBUNE published not only nature OF suit
but connection Of parties with Pan-Ecctrc Company
49, Sept. % Tr. .. and soon after Rogers letter
disclosing entire conspiracy, 's5, Sept so. Tr. l.
It appeared that Rogers and other parties had quar-
relied. and Rogers sued to recover money, litigation
being not yet ended. President saw that 1t would
cover Administration with disgrace II suit so begun
suffered TO continue, and In published letter no
directed suit TO be withdrawn and question referred
to the Interior Department. Secretary Lamar then
went through form Of hearing testimony and counsel
about tho matter 'e5, Oct. IL. TT. . Speculative
pool formed, while case was pending, to mako big
operation on promised now what decision
was TO be: copy of decision TO beleft in hands as
sistant night, and key OF room handed % out
recommenacd Dat to set aside Bel patents SO Jan.
10. Tr 2. not unexpected In view relations OF Iartns
son D Honss had orered inSe.teston Of .candal5s
Mar s. IT, and gendns that O. Garland land by wrote s u
relieve myself and the administration from apparent
81 o SSt think It r for ms tn
ANYTHING until Investigation Horse concludea" Mar;
Young 'lES'' Mar 90 r, 3; Garland, Nay q: r. 2:
Bradley. T Jobn'on, April Z, II; Contact be.
Rogers letters produced Mar 4. IT, s. Garland;
s2ny Ut ae A II % I'GST y s
in letter said n cntergIss should not sqcceel al
concerned, ali OF usn April 3. Tr. .. Atidns lost
temper whllo testfying Anrl 3. TT .. Forbes.
published Tor, $1,000 articles reviewing history 81
case and critic,nc Government. 20. April 70, TT.
testified Pan-Ecctrc stock offered them: and refused
to touch T. Nay l. IT, 2: FORBES leter to Jones
Nay TT c yn Beuh Mg pnr
3 Majority made whitewashIng report, June 81.
IT: 2. Tut minority report, June 80 IT, J. was prae.
asscn. to majority, RepOrt criticised, July l, TT:
. Rogers review OF evidence. July 2, IT. A. Why
rents dilemma in view Of report July s, TT. I.
Meanwhile bin had been fled hy PC. Kumler. Dis:
Mar 9a t. RSserss suit AGAINST H Garland nd and
brings into court certificates Of stock; will abide by
deere OF court IN equity asking that any scrip re-
willing 70 account for all pecunary benefits, Arg.
1rrgr AasTsr by R R"S s, Aug u.s. 7! De-
Young and Atkins alsS Ang 81 TT g Names Of
Garland answers dc@andng sueh eydense aiken as
70 make snit enormously costly and freeze out Rogers
s stock " Worthless s '1 p Of shi r. SUIT ca Rn Snsr
was sustained expressly the ground that Rogers
washington Post" says office Of Assistant commis'
sioner Indian Affairs created for Pan Electric accom-;
jerks. made socitor-jeneral at Garands personal
regne.t" so Oct H. IT. 5; respecting Garand's
OF Choctaw suit against United States psrfuncory
and lane and that no special counsel Were employed
Oct against Government for about 50 100000 SO.
r. =,
A COSTLY SUIT DISGRACEFUILY BEATEN
In telephone case great force OF costly attorneys
employed on behalf Government but suit quashed
by United States Circuit Court on ground that proper
elements TO give Jurisdiction in Ohio did not exist;
and that the company did not carry its business
in that state. The claim set up by Government,
that dealing In patent made the comapnv domestic
throughout the United States territory rejected
by the court and suit dismissed for want Of iuris-
So for SSy an TT asked
large share OF that absorbed for important attor
neys In telephone suit. which disgracefully failed
'a6. Dec II. TT I. Among known items of cost were
for Mr.. Thurman, 81 900 retalret Mr. Lowry the
sane: Hunton and Chandler for the ONO suit only
s. 900: whitman. 5000 Coode. the solictOrgen.
eral. who hal been rejected BY the Senate. $1,000
year: all with travelling expenses. hotel bills. etc.
Sc. Dec g S. . In explanation of Government con-
duct. "1he Sun " saws "suIt not brought In Massa-
chusets because there question had ALREADY been do
cded in favor Of patent: also in NEWPORT Pennsyi-
mnistration suit. which is but a creature OF tho
Pan Electric speculators. was brought In Ohio where
all patents might reverse the conclusion OF every
other Judge who had hearl the There has
structure Of law by administrative power in this
job, pn. m upon Mr. Cleveland By his Pan Electric
chusetts 80. Dec 8. Tr. /. Meanwhile suits in.
yolying tho same question In legitimate course OF
covering 10000 printed pages, ard most Important
lawyers employed SO Oct. 10. 1r. 8. Further
details 4se oo. Gn an% ssSmstnes. s. Sept sept % IF
the dcfenses made 80 Sept 20. IT. 1. letter reviewing
tho sss oSnon and s sept S
IT. l statement Of Atkins 's5, sept 90. o: tho
cha s. Ssw against al 1sS Bell 3d. Tss 10 SEPT
to a.soci H es SO Feb s g. rCscrss lstsr
So Feb. le 8. /; testimony of Young. 'se. Feb. 49,