Telegram-herald., 1887-07-30

lave ihe great sAare of sueh resorters con
| hnea within t1s cars ui 5 stHesf fsilwsy
- Il t5eAsAnEex flf The residents ~ lEse1s
streets An1 zssnurs - so tbtn dFifsl up
O. saaet.s 81 - boFse faoers. = fasi dtis-
loT sstsr - fhen sne their isuiiile@ flalne
isr piess2re than ordinary t.Taueni drlSint
Il - claimed chat tie tNrs 81 Jef.sEsal
! ave ana esAls-si is dangerous tufh' eu'
TIE sFlsienee shows tie grade ~ Tie in1ef
! section = nol As al sleep sna tie angie -
greater than rigkl aakss AID the.sit'ss
icss dangerous sAoepg thai beiAe al easisi
tafn than . rigli sus.s. tus fssl drivers
Who rsse doen Stste-ss. sSks mere chances
aud drlye issisf and make tAeaf own
danger ~ their 0wn feeklr>snes< ATsin.
y has been argued that these efe The oniY
diving sirexts Iu tie city. Certainly there
= len ~ yslerSoN- AL nut = is~ hnn-
cred feei II TIE northern portion oa when
Tie residents can enjoy tbs iuxuTies II
jockeys and fasf horsemen raC-nE their
horses Winters ana Summers O. The e1-
clusion ~ pleasure aud isnils drivers upon
that avenue. Aad oerlAinis f Sgsle-st =
50 steep as a. s4Eae All easy angle nlofe
dangerous than q right angie g is noi q
proper street tef tasi driving and racine,
snl there =. no evidence ia this case 40
slo. iAN. shat street D. ever nsec faH racing
proper. escepi ~ that Iecs cation Is incsig
ei iA py tboss who frequent iae lske and
fefurn st ~ hours "a The day and Iifi-t IA
sach condition. either on ACCOUNT ~ press
ing business arrangements a. ctherW ise. see
nl 10 use Is for that purpose. Ane certain
IS tteUT-st S. it seeInS 10 be proven wilh
only twenty feet Ia drive and twenty 81
ieei devoted 10 Sidewalk laSns aud bitches
with banks SO sleep ihal thsy have 30 ne
bruRei does not shord ae safesi oT lac
only grounds, eltheI Tor pleasure drive or
for horse racing.
White Aaais0B -sye. and ioferson-6Te.
sns other bes and rnobsirgctsd
streets stretch oiIf lhsir miles vi ssid road
bed, Inviting citizens u drive upon those
thorousAiSrss Nlfh safety never 10 be- found
upon streets 20 ogeIhurccnsd By c0MeIs
anu cOrrs - this read D. shown - be Dy
evidence introduced herein In Short. FL
tie evidence lu tEis case lends - ahow that
oi ali The streets hich need the Fs4iel 81 a
street car lile TO accommodate YEsl
travel this proposed route coset such
streets Beside. lne gIsat accommodation
a. Wl.l afford % thousands Of sioents
nearer TIE outskirts who are either not
able or not disposed 10 keep horses and
carriages for their accommodation. rbd TO
the enhancement in the price Of properties
IN such suburbs many thousands of dollars
more ihan all the Imaginary injury 10 the
c01piaiuants.
IN view OF ile fact that vast number Of
witnesses ior the plaintiffs ana defendants
have beel sworn touching these as ID seems
10 inis tCrft entirely mmafer.al Ques ions.
this Court has taken the beriy H. comment
somewlaf largely upon ii.
Bui. q, ! before unmarked ihe question
Tor this CClrt 10 determine "a sppesrs l0 me
ls. whether ihe resolution 0f fhe Connect
together with the 0roingnce are sufficient
authority for the Stree, hallway Company
20 proceed % ihe laviug Is line oa tle
route. Ihst Tie franchise ersnfea Go lhis
company IS ~ great value there can be no
question. enc thai when tbe Council 81
tempts 70 terier aaay suc1 ID s5t if should
be done in 40 liglt ard frivolous manner.
TIE statute tom which the- derive aIl
powers requires tDs' slcb authority ss
e feH hl az ordinance which reousocs fiie
sarie aeuOerat ons l3r ~ passage. if le fot
il' ent that u be cane hY q simple -es9.l-
ft0n Ehirh mar ce passed on the sIsf 1f
tne moment and without tie lormhlilies
neee- -ry SO valid ordinance.
The tle ordinance ol ltsl NAV have been
intended hy the Council tu apply 20 ga ne,y
lines i1e ioaff VIII nos determine. bar t1af
j is not sufficient under fAe statute Tire
Court iia determined. 'see Howell : statute,
Section .j4S
The iuii0n nor tie ordinance of lsss.
nor both ~ mv opinion. come NO 80 and
cover the requirements of the slaiufe and
taat hc Council So undert0od y ben hey il.
irOducai the ordinance. which was not
acted upon - ,hc request 81 ihe defendant
IN this case seems eyiieD. fa this { 0uff
- tbct upan this ground iuagmen. Is fof
the comp'ai1anis aud lhai such niuncilor
= iuil force uuiii laufa. authority
is giyea tY oraInance ios them % proceed
in the premises