Oxford Democrat. [volume] (Paris, Me.) 1833-1933, 1887-11-01
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT.
ocrcnrx TkRx. 1887.
COURT OFFICERS

NN'Aa RAtANa@'t
HoS. Wa. WHIT viRoIx.
Prsad,ag Jssiics.
ALbsRr :. AUSTIN. Clerk.
Ocean II. HkRsEy. Counfy Attorney.
WOODBURY. PutsuKR. SisnosropAer.
CYKrs VI. woRxKLt. SAer,f.
II X HkNNoSD. Crier.
SAxUHL X. CARrKR. LsbrarsaR.
WILLIAM A BAKnows. Ns.enger.
II has been some time since . case in
this Court ha. s,,rss,sd 30 general aiier-
ton ssd awakened 80 deep an interest ~
the che On trial nearly the whole Of las,
week.
Il vas tie case q Henry q Brown.
Adnitistr.ioF of the estate Of David y.
brown. ". Lewis II. Reed.
Hon. jehn T.. ssasey conducted the
case Ia a. admirable manner on the par,
Of the plsiriia. aud Hon. =. c. s'rOa,.
q Porilssd and Mi. David X. Hss,ing.
appeared vi'A ability Zoe the defence.
In hi. case the plaintiff claims the
property u The ss;sis Of the late David
2. brown. (shieh Is nov in the hands Of
The dsfsaaaai.) fot distribution among
the heirs. and the defendant claims TO
hold the property under q eoa,fae. made
with The deceased. whereby be Reed
90. 10 .aPPOr, David = B'O-n and h.
~i's daring the remainder " their hie-
time. AID prodacss transfers of all the
real aad r~r.oh.l prOPSs'y Of the deees'-
81. ,isnsd BY him on the 2slh day OF
NAY 1850 H. answer 10 this, the PLAZA
I'D .ss up ;hs, q, the time q the maxi
ing Of IBIS contract and Coz some time
previous. The lA;s David Z. Brosn wAs
broken down IN body snd miad to the
extent ths, be wss unable 10 MAKE .
legal contract. And that be Us also u1-
daily Influenced by the defendant 10
make thi. con,rset There ~as no que.
ton r,issd a. 70 the sxis,snee ofihs cCn-
,r.s, and transfer Of the property. ba'
The i.sae wIs upon the question Of Nj
Bro-ns capacity 20 make a lss.l Goa
tract and also upon the proposition Of
undas influence having been brought -
bear
The case VAS opeasd Mosisy MON.
ing u las, week Nearly forty ~iin--
,ss. -sre examined. The case ven, 20
The ,sry Friday ncoa and they returned
a verdict fof the pl.ia,iG o. twenty three
hundred sni thirty dollars. With special
fadings ihs; TIE late David L. BfO-a
"a. iteOnps,sn, =, the time the eonuse,
was made ald also that be vu uadly
influenced
The case goes to the Las Court on
exceptions hled by dsfsad.a,s eoanssl.
Friday afisfnOon the criminal to;k,t
wa. reached. aad the case Of the State
". DAHL A. Cothn uPon iadieimsn, -
= common seller Of Intoxicating liquors
as tried. County Attorney Hsr.sy sP-
ps.ied Go the prosecution and James 5
whgh, and Alfred 5. Kimbsll fOr the
defence The defendant !. the Liquor
Agtn, q, Milton Plsnisiion. TIE jay
saA o., NOS; Of Saturday FORENOON and
failed to agree on verdist
Daniel A. Coffin VAS arrisnsd on
Indictment for maintaining ngislnee-
plead guilty aud vas hasd one hundred
dollars ani cos,s.
Gco'gs IS. Little -ss Au.isnsd ca ia.
dic,msni q. common seller q Intoxicating
liquors. plea guilty. aaed one hundrsd
dollar. AL costs Mr.. Litils'. sentence
90. made f0r oaere- committed under
The Cd l.s. no sale having been prjvsa
since the ne- ls- took effect.
Moaisy fore oon the Cogr, heard .
petition f0f review in the case u sl.iie'y
w. To-n Of P.n.. which peii,ioa "a,
made on the grOsnd q newly discovered
evidence The testimony Of Frsteis
whiinsy q No. Paris vas taken, slsa
tia, Of several witnesses Ca the plaintiff.
Judge vIsia refused 10 gran, . Few
trial oa the evidence presented Ssssey
and S,sArns appeared iOr PHI. Davis for
def.