New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1887-03-12
CHALLENGING THE JURORS
rwrNTy.sIx OUT or FORTY MADE USE OF.
TWO WEEKS CONSUMED IN THE cLrARY CASE AND
No HRY YET

~wo WEEKS CONSUMED IN THE CLsARf CASb AM
NO JURY YEr.
ma seeond week Of tho Ceary trial has ended ana
49, atm waning Tho prosecution has stopped chal
i.usipe but the defence has begun again Inc peremP
.crv challenges stand The people. IL: tho defendant
"A Each aldo has right to challenge twenty times
Duvtpg the last weeks ten panels have been drawn
and 6n0 men called N II case or many oe'ne cA"e
and exceedingv few chosen Out Of the 800 4o7 have
bern Examined and 81 these 81 have gone ino the box
When the court opened YESTERDAY the sixth seat wa
vaeant II soon assigned TO Manr'ty Palhanan I"
NvtIler of No 40 Maiden Lane. living at No 100 Ea'f
exty fonrhs Mr. Erol then dispaced the hrst Jnror'
Timothy Mnlcahev. BENJAMIN l. BOwlrs livery staoe
feeper at 1872 East offered himSe" '"
10 MI the breach he and he could not believe tne e'
denee Of accompers np'er any circumstances ",'os'
as eorroboraed Mr. ahafcr maintained that as the ~"
d not peym,s con npon snrh evfden'" uncorro"
GRATED anvhow the witness not dsqualn"h oy tne
.ro.s,op that he would not believe It The Judee neio
differently. He said:
rnr: pa. ne rva.T S OF s az :" ~"n"sS tse
Seea1sn, with rrime Thar :. All tn. ."rronoravs EVIL
70 No.. H. s
e r." r.. helm. ;s:
81. ne , .ss 70 rrs s msns sav
n ss r.. to ss s@s, se tod n ' he
cnai'.nre
nlr"d rsrirnlarlv about his opinion He had told Mr.
Hrol tpst u wss only an mrrr'"n ian, " IN 1p nc
been three convictions slr"ahr When fhS cnrr"nf runs
oue wov docs not The channel heen-n '" MT Paft"n
se,d he hadn't thou~hf of II mneh that WAY. bn nnon
S.,rc En- ysested to him he honght imnor'ant con
n, pasten was dslo'gNh Jacob Hrhwah spns" IN nnds
hnt shev were eloen' enop"h tn Indicate fha MS "nh
wss maze m. Alexander J. Bachman a1ewr,er. AZ 70
Maiden Lane, wns taken as the rorehSh TIC r""o"
TO no n fairly oood man. A., ..
The challenge now transmitted IN the ner'nre'
who used 10 nv ous'ne Howard lockwood me mos, IN
tevrnt ,nr"r In fhc hoy We all ,nror con'd he
for an Innocent mnn-clearheaded. hroad mnne' can
Ar and far JnA"e Rarreffs nsnalv imnas"ve rM'
rrossei nv distinct shafe q, ntses ,nS ,
so~,.mn,Il5a ncrson whom the ndge charac'rrzed a.
ieeNpy In moral INTO the hox. That was EN-
Dbes,,ei nv dismissed 81 Juror Horace focfe who
rrns on,v second IN qualifications IN Nr Lockwood Mr.
eheser IL pueh ess cautions In disclosing me ch'rarer
az HE methods than the counsel Tor the prevost
conviefed Aldermen Hrs pnrpose IT, so e'iIHnt INIT
can SCARCELY holm ha wing an extremely bad effect the
other urUTs. similar scene was enh"red Mhrn hhhrew
i Par,ine was called N take Mr.. Tochwoofs place We
dcressor Mr. shafer wasted half an ho"r 10 teep him
and falling 10 make "nf ease or n's "un.IN
challenged the Juror peremptorilv William peismater
a member ~ tho firm owning the Dc'amater
Iron works was called those Intended
10 nm Juror Fnofe's nace lie had fne face nm wore
good clothes and fell under tho han Of the defences as
ci5e ,he rass on merits ~ the evidence onv VT
Vincent atnred with the witness and struggled for thirty
seven minutes 10 show HAS. when rue Jhee SAM
overruIe vonr CHALLENGE" he said 10 with snap the
w,pess whom fhe pronounced deficient IN moral
character was Aucnst r. Ktnstler. 81 No. ?o1 ',ut-
sonsi on Nt ermple's examination he said he had an
o,nlon and could not decide nnnfnenced nv H.
Mr. shafer persuadei him 10 he conld Then W.T. Sem
ME discovered that he was an aeqna lance OF JaeheH
and tho Judge home the Qneson ~ 10 why ne
had first said he could deciAe The ease uninHenFed
nv his oplninn and then Immediately aferwnrd sam ne
fonh lie finally owned MP hat he said II befhlse ne
wanted 10 get away. Judge Barrett said go SRI ana