New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1887-02-26
AGAINST JAMES E. QUINN.
,,rncr ppowy ON STRIKE AND BOYCOTT.

,,,, ovrs AGAINST THE OLD DOMINION
STEAMSHIP COMPANY WE'RE ILLEGAL. .
u,are Addison Brown. 10 the United states Circuit
rprt has had under consideration for several Gays INC
motion to the order OF arrest IN Tue sun % 'o
Old Dominion steamship Company against Master WORK
man oniun and four Of this Executive Committee OF the
OCEAN Association in which the defendants were ar
resed and each was held in 5000 bail. Judge Brown
flcd his decision yesterday, in which he says in part
This action brought 70 reeoyer S21gU H. un
lawful action tho DEFENDANTS in the recent strike 81 s
az and In eo s CAMPER to SS
:fs ON SPSs s s nS a tie
information and 9es Ony w rst the facts
not make out pIima fae case ha sg,s and that
ps"ss Ssga .aat n, ~. order Of arrest
sp9u not ssy the elaborate arguments OF
For lack Of time only state my es stated posi-
lively the source Of information is
The facts in tie complaint mt sn naU for the
tus ssai sss: sefs for the following
pant was ens:sea II ' an oher era used In
IL business In the Of which numerous workme6
sron terms to wages and
one any nhs e ssieHsis
about he s' 20 paD. this
civ and Southern porIs quit work IN Ioy Tor ne pun
r.: 81 se he ia
"a T. s "sSss me- SssiG~ work. *
he painf Icing justified constituttd In law
and Illegal interference Viii the piaih'i
which is actionable. .. .,..u, ,,o aa,o,aon,s,
precufSent had OUT work defendants for the further
Unlawful purpose of compelling the plaintiff 10 pay suen
might demand declared boy cot OF e
plaintiffs business and attempted to prevent the pahun
business common carriers OF IOp
ness and stop all dealings OF other persons
with sending threatening noce OF
10 lis various patrons ana 10 the Apes W
various steamshp lines and To wharhDgers ana
men usually dealing with The plaintiffs designer 70 ih
ste them from having dealings with II thIoug to.s
Of loss ana expense in they dealt with 1mt y ~"
ceiyg sharing Transmitting Its go0hs or otheI"asv; %
fat yarios deferred from dealing Win Wy
psin In OF such Dtimidatons am refused 10
periorm existing contracts, ana withheld he o'ei GUS
td) The mentioned were not Only IeH9 touueS
the defendants liable in damages but also
common well by section l6S OF the renal .o"e VI
..,,,-u ,,o,
others than individuals all combinations ana asso
lions workuen 20 Oecome memDers OF 70
ObsiruCt annoy them IN WORKING OF ~
work because they NOS memlers or IN oIue 10
become members or designed 10 prev en-
ployers making just Discrimination paid 70 the
lazy 10 the efdcient and the ineiheIenti and all
associations designed 10 interfere with tDe PEI,
feet freedom OF employers in the proper mahaseiuen|
and control Of their lawful business or IL dictate III any par
ficuar the upon which their business shall Oe conduC
of threats OF injury or loss by Interference WIN
fer property traffic. with their lawful employment OF
other persons aOridge any OF these rghs are
illegal associations and all acts done III uI
such intentions by such means anu sceonpaeu
by damage aCtlOnablo
rights debar II IRON the usual rentny
Ihe motion discharge from arrest IS uelleo