National Republican., 1887-04-26
THE COURT RECORD.

United States supreme Court.-The following
business was transacted In the Supreme Court
of the United States yesterday
Francis A. Lewis of Philadelphia; 5. B.
Bradford, of Topeka. Kan; Frank Macarthur.
of New York city, and Augustus L. Mason, OF
Indianapolis, were admitted to practices.
No. 2lO. Florida Laughlin, appellant, VS..
joseph d. Mitchell VS.. Decree affirmed with
costs. Opinion by Mr.. Justice Blatchrord.
No. 1sO. The Albany and Rensselaer, Iron
and Steel Company vs.. Gustaf Lundberg.
Judgment reversed with costs and cause re-
manded with directions to set inside the YER
dict ana 10 order new trial. Opinion by Mr.
No. 226. The Milwaukee aud Northern Rail-
way Company VS.. The Brooks Locomotive
interest. Opinion by Mr.. Justice Matthews.
No. III. The OuaChita and Mississippi River
Packet Company ct al. VS.. Mrs. Cdtharine NJ.
Aiken, administratriX, e nj; Decree affirmed
No. 1S9. William Milne, executor, Sc VS.
Ann Maria Deem. judgment reversed. with
costs, and cause remanded with directions 10
award new trial. Opinion by Mr Justice
No. 1877. Charles W. Boyutou VS.. Plowden II
Ball. Judgment reversed, with costs, and
cause reInanded for further proce sdiugs TO be-
had therein in conformity with the opin "a OF
this court. Opinion by Mr.. Justics Miller; dis
senting, Mr Justice Gray.
No. 2l9. Luigi Flliberte ct al VS.. the bark
John Ii. Parson, &c. Decree reversed, with
costs, and cause remauded for further pro 1eed.
ings TO he had therein IN conformity with the
opinion Of this court Opinion b. Mr.. Chief
No. 252. Eugene Sullivan, collector, &C., VS..
Alexander Balfour ct al Judgment affirmed
with costs and interest. Opinion by Mr.. Chief
Justice Waite.
No. 1925. Caroline Carson vs. C. T. Dunham.
Decree affirmed with costs. opinion by Mr..
Chief Justice Waite.
King 4 Son. Motion, to relnstats case on
docket and recall mandate denied. Announced
by Mr.. Chief Justice Waite.
No: 26. AndrewB. Cross VS.. Guy + Sabin OF
al Motion TO rcinstate case on the docket de-
MED. Announced by Mr.. Chief Justice Waite.
No. 1901. stephenson Waters. administrat )r
appellant, vs. John A. Buckner ct al. No. 1872.
John M a. A; Bnckner et al, appel,ants. vs. stephen,
dsmed. Announced by Mr.. Chief Justice
No; 1852; Mary Wells VS. wm. N. Parker ct
al. Dismissed with costs.
No; go. Jane G. Hitz vs. VIM. p. jerks
Continued.
No; 1871. The Thorn Wire Hedge Company
ct al. VS.. c. ID, Fuller ct al. Advanced pui.
suant 10 thirty-second rule.
No. sll. The Texas Transportation Company
et al. vs. George seelisson; administrator Of
epWry WSyni Siee!isson M Co. submitted by Mr
Earle and Mr.. w. W. Royce for appellee.
No. Sol. George Seeligson, administrator, VS..
Inc IeNnS transportation Company ct al.
Dismissed with costs.
No 1919. Bertrand Saloy VS. Simon Bloch
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted by Mr..
Charles W. Homer in support of notion and
by Mr.. VIM. a. Maury In opposition thereto.
No 1859. William l.. Powell VS.. The Com
monwcath of Pennsylvania Motion to dis
miss or affirm submitted by Mr.. Wayne Mac.
Neagh In support of motion aud by Mr.. ID. T..
Watson In opposition thereto,
No. 1881. The Newark Machine Company vs.
Peter l., Hargett CT al. DOckuted aud dts.
missed with costs
No Originally The state OF Wisconsin VS.
Pelican Insurance Company. Demurrer ~
pleas argued by Mr.. Samuel Shalabsrgor fNr
the plaintiff and by Mr. John a. Campbell for
the defendant.
No, 2G4. Alexander r. Shepherd vs. John W,
Thompson. Argument commenced by Mr..
Andrew C.. Bradley for plaiutif In error.
Adjourned until to'dny
Court in General Term-IuSticos Hagner
James, Cox, MerIiGk, ami M1ntgOmery--Mu.
Donald vs.. Lttlelleld; ordeT releasing estate
from tax lien. District of Columbia vs.. Bllti-
more and Potomac Railroad Company: infOr.
nation QuaShed, Dunn d Co w. Cato; iudg,
ment below reversed. Assignment for q day..
Nos 81 90, 80, A. 49, 50, Oi, 90 ltl, H. III, los
and 100
Circuit Court-Justice Cox.-wo,ds VS..
Trinity Parish; jury out
- Equity Conrt-Jus.ice Merrick,-S.arr vs.
Treackle: sale ratified nisi. hin VS. CrOgen;
final 'ecree. Harris vs.. Barber; su0p p.Gnd du9es
tecum ordered TO issue
4. Angney, assault to kill on trial.