The Hawaiian gazette., 1887-03-29
Supreme Court of the Hawaiian ISL
ands--Apri1 Term, Beginning
Monday, April 4, 1887.
HON. ANTOINE ROSA, ATTORNEY GENERAL.
HAWAIIAN JURY.
McCULLY, J. Presiding

defendant.
Estate of Mauae. Probate appeal. Kinney
d Peterson for plaintiff; A. G. Smith for de-
PENDANT.
Kalaeokekoi VS.. Kahele. Eiectment. Thomp-
son for plaintiff; Brown for defendant.
Kimo vs., Kailianu. Ejectment. Poepoe
for plaintiff; Smith, Thurston & Kinney for
defendant.
Kanaloa VS.. Quinn. Ejectrnent. Thomp-
son, Poepoe for plaintiff; Smith, Thurston &
Kinney for defendant.
MIXED JURY.
Hebron VS.. Kameenui. Ejectment. Brown
for plaintiff; Rosa for defendant.
Alisiu VS.. Uilama. Damage. Kinney i
Peterson for plaintiff; Rosa for defendant.
Parke VS.. Robinson. Trover. Brown for
plaintiff; Smith, Thurston & Kinney for de-
PENDANT
Waahia VS.. Enos. Assumpsit Castle for
plaintiff.
Kaaukai VS.. Wight. Eiectment. Achi for
plaintiff; Smith, Thurston & Kinney for de-
fendant.
Lonowahine VS.. Campbell. Ejectment.
Kinney & Peterson plaintiff.
Kahoohuli vs.. Hamauku. Eiectment. Rosa,
Peterson for plaintiff; Smith, Thurston d
Kinney for defendant.
Colburn VS.. Parke. Replevin. Whiting g.
Creighton for plaintiff; Smith, Thurston d
Kinney for defendant.
FOREIGN JURY.
The King vs.. All Wing. Possession of
opium. Atty. Genl. for the crown; Neumann
for defendant.
The King VS.. Alisiu. Adultery. Atty. Genl.
for the crown.
The King VS.. Thomas & Harrigan. Mali
ious Injury. Atty. Genl. for the crown;
Brown, Hatch for defendant.
The King vs.. Vance. Assault with Pistol.
Atty. Genl. for the crown; A. G. Smith for
defendant.
The King VS.. All Sick. Larceny. Atty.
Genl. for the crown.
Chapman vs.. Hawaiian Government. Tres
pass. Dole, Thurston for plaintiff; Atty.
GenI. for defendant.
Buchanan VS.. Burgess. Ejectment. Brown
for plaintiff; Thompson for defendant.
Cartwright vs.. Hofnung. Assumpsit.
Swift VS.. Macfe. Assumpsit. Castle for
plaintiff; Hatch for defendant.
Alderman VS.. Congdon. Assumpsit. Dole
for plaintiff; Ashford & Ashford for defen-
dant.
Spreckels VS.. Macfarlane. Assumpsit.
Hatch, Dare for plaintiff; Neumann for de-
PENDANT.
Chung Hoy vs.. Rosenthal. Assumpsit.
Whiting d Creighton for plaintiff; Neumann
for defendant.
Greenwich VS.. Cooper. Assumpsit Hatch
for plaintiff, Austin for defendant.
Veasey vs. Herbert. Case. Ashford &
Ashford for plaintiff.
Rice VS.. Cornwell Assumpsit. Kinney d
Peterson for plaintiff; Neumann for defen-
dant.
Gibson vs. Manuel. Debt. Castle for plain
tiff.
Hyman VS.. Sanford. Assumpsit Smith &
Thurston for plaintiff; Kinney Il Peterson
for defendant.
McWayne vs.. McCarty. Assumpsit. Hatch
for plaintiff; Dare for defendant.
Rosenthal vs.. Paiko. Damage. Hatch,
Neuman for plaintiff; Brown for defendant.
Wing Wo Tai q Co vs.. Ablo. Assumpsit.
Dole for plaintiff.
Parke VS.. See Hop Co. Assumpsit Whit
ing Creighton for plaintiff.
Trask vs. Pakiko, appellant. Equity ap-
peal. Kinney d Peterson for plaintiff;
Thompson for appellant.
Peterson VS.. Lazarus, appellant. Equity
appeal. Thurston for plaintiff; Kinney q
Peterson for appellant.
Hop Sing Co. VS.. Kun On, appellant.
Equity appeal. Ashford q Ashford and Kin
neg d Peterson for plaintiff; Neumann and
Hatch for appellant.
Kerr VS.. Mayhem. Appeal by Aseu, gar
nishee. Thurston for plaintiff; Neumann
for defendant; Ashford u Ashford for gar
nishee.
Michiels vs.. Hartford ms. Co., appellant.
ton for plaintiff; Dare and Dole for appel
liant.
Michiels Ys. Commercial ms. Co., appel
liant. Exceptions. Neumann, Whiting and
Creighton for plaintiff; Dare and Dole for
appellant.
liant. Exceptions. Neumann, Whiting and
Creighton for plaintiff; Dare and Dole for
appellant.
The King vs.. McGifin, appellant. Excep-
tions. Atty. Gen. for the crown; Whiting Il
Creighton and A. Q. Smith for appellant
Alau and Ami VS.. Kepoikai, appellant. Ex-
ceptions. Ashford q Ashford for plaintiff;
Rosa for appellant.
McGrew, appellant, vs.. Barnes d McCand-
for appellant; Brown, Kinney d. Peterson. for
defendant.
heliikanakaole vs.. Kawaa, Appellant. Ex-
ceptions. Kinney d Peterson for plaintiff;
Rosa for appellant.
Leiau vs.. Kalua, appellant. Equity ap-
peal. Thompson for plaintiff; Austin for
appellant.
Lyman, appellant, vs.. Minister of Finance.
Police Court appeal. Neumann and Hatch
The King va Young Tang, appellant.
Police Court Appeal. Atty. Gen. for the
crown; Dars and Magoon for appellant.
Estate of Unea Probate appeal. Holo-
kahlki and Kane for plaintiff; Kinney &
Peterson for defendant.
Keawe vs.. Halawa Sugar Co., appellant.
Appeal from Third Circuit. Kinney & Peter
soy5for plaintiff; Thurston for appellant.
Witt, appellant, vs.. Garstin. Equity ap-
peal. Castle for appellant; Hatch for de-
PENDANT.
Wilcox rs. Kekahuna, appellant. Excep
tons. Rosa for plaintiff; Holokahiki and
Kane for appellant.
Thrum, appellant, vs.. P. G. Advertiser Co.
Equity appeal. Thurston and A. G. Smith
Tor appellant; Whiting & Creighton and
Hatch Tor defendants.
Wood vs.. Dillingham;. Equity appeal.
Whiting & Creighton and Kinney q Peter
son for plaintiff; Hatch and Dole for de-
fandant.
Luukia (w) VS.. Keka (k). Holokahiki for
Wahinenui wv VS.. Haiola (k). Thurston
for plaintiff.
Milton tw) VS.. Milton (k).
Aea tk) VS.. Aea (w). Poepoe for plaintiff.
Kauko (wl VS.. Panihale (k). Achi for
Maikai (kl VS.. Maikai w.. Poepoe for
plaintiff.
All Soon tk) VS.. All Soon wv. Neumann
for plaintiff.
Kali Ok VS.. Kali Cw). Neumann for
plaintiff.
Kekaua (k) VS.. Kaohu (wj. Poepoe for