Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1887-06-30
and Cattle Company, Callahan county;


wade; R. II Blown VS.. S. T. 6 G. Martin,
Nc Mullen; S. j. Harrell VS.. w "a. Morris,
Lsmpasas; PhGniX Insurance Company
VS.. P. J.Willis & Bro, Lampasss; August
Bower ct al. VS.. Daniel Adee ct ell, Nc
Mullen; L. H. Graham e. al. VS.. McCarty
& Brown ct al. Hood; Ersstus Brockel
We. Ed McKechnie, Tom Green; II. T. &
J. f. II pkins vs.. j. 2. Neggli, Medina
T. W. House VS.. Robert Brent ct al,
Hood; J. NJ. Mitchell VS.. w. NJ. Allen,
Esstland; Warren Garrett ct al. VS. j. w.
Weaver, Kinney; d. n. Leevs. J. n. Yam
dell ct al, Nolan; J II. MilIiKan et sl.vs.
Callahan County, Stephens; |. Stone et
al. VS.. A. Day, Somervel; Josephine
Riordan ct al. VS.. A. NJ. Brittor,
Mitchell; James II. Schmick eI
al. vs.. \. ". Nell, EsstlGnd !;
Eugene L. Richie VS.. George 2. Levy,
Parker; P. B. Madrey ct al. VS.. w. B.
Cox, Fannin; Mrs. S. Z. Stone ct 81. VS..
Eugene Ellis ct al, h1cLeDnan; A Groes-
beck VS.. Ike Golden et al, Robertson !;
S. G. Mccormick VS.. j. L. Edwards,
Ellis; Half, Weis & Co. VS.. G. P. Curtis,
Ellis; Missouri Pacific Railway Company
vs.J. T. Bartlett, Bell; Margaret Boone
ct al. w. John Hulsey ct al, Fannln; W.
w. Glasgow VS.. L. E. Owens, McLen-
nan; Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Rail
way Company VS.. Eliss A. Moore, Johu-
son; T. L. Marsslis & Co. VS.. E. 1. Pit
man, Ellis; Roden T. Crane VS.. S. A.
Hogan, Bosque county; Max Weis vs..
Oliver & Griggs, Limestone; Bolton
Compress Company VS.. Sarge Sanders,
Bell; Gulf, Colorado and santa Fe Rail
way Company VS.. Calvin P. Fox, j ohnson
Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railway
Company VS.. S. a. PoindeXter ct al,
Johnson; NJ. L. Fairs ct al. VS.. C.. p.
Albea ct al, McLennan; Gulf, Colorado
and Santa Fe Railway Company VS.. James
S. Greenlee and wife, Bosque; S. J
Siddall ct al. VS.. Thomas Coggin & Bro,
Bosque; Josiah Watson vs. Miller Bros.
Bell; Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Rail
way Company vs.. James Benson, Bosque
Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railway
Company VS.. John Hedrick, McLennan
r. j. Mckinney ct 81. VS.. B. M. Matthews
Hill; Emma and B. L. Aycock VS.
William II. Kimbrough, Falls; James c.
Walker vs.. l.. a. Stroud ct al, Lime
stone; 7. NJ. Shirley ct a.. vs.. Waco TAI
Railroad Company ct al, McLeDnsn; J
D. B. Cole vs. Jesse Es.elle, McLennan
Thomas T. Howard ct al. VS. NJ. Hopper
ct al, Milan; J. H. Fisher VS.. j. A
Abney, Hill; Ball, Hutchings & Co
VS.. Z. NJ. Collins, McLennan
L. & H Blum vs.. j. Strong, McLen-
nan; w. A. Taylor VS.. T. 3. Cox, McLen.
nan; Wilson Hammers VS.. Eugene Han
rich, Falls; j. M. Paul ct ST. VS. Gather
inc A. Willis ct al, Bell; B. F. Blassin.
game VS.. NJ. j. Davis ct al, Ellis; james
n 81 81 D.
r. 2. Bigham VS.. John Mcdowell ct al,
Bell; James L. Scott VS.. T. L. PettigreW
ct al, Bell; Robert Moore VS.. James l.
Stewart ct al, Falls; a. d. Blackwell VS.
w B. HunniCutt, Falls; S. B. bryan vs.
Z. G. Haurick, Falls; Ike Casey ct al. VS.,
+. G. Hanrick, Fails; S D. Jacoby eft al.vs
J. L. Brighmsn, Hll;'A. B. Gather VS.. L
6. Hsnrick, Falls; Robert j. Brooks vs..
Sanger Bros, MCLennan.
The following cases having been given
precedence, are transferred to Tyler: The
State of Texas VS.. j A. Rhomberg eft ell,
Travis; City of Aastin VS.. Austin Gas
light and Coal Company, Travis; A. r
Morris VS.. Lone Star Chaptey No. G r. A.
NJ. Travis.
All cases pending on appeal from Ellis
county, that county having been made
returnable to the branch at Tyler, were
transferred to that branch.
1t is ordered that the following cases be
taken under Amusement and transferred
to Galveston: j. (. Henderson VS.. An
glo- American Land and Claim Associa-
ton, Dallas; w. G.. Howard vs.. j. H.
Britton & Co., Dallas; j. G. Lynch VS..
Alex Ortlico & Co., Dallas; Scottish U.
and n. Insurance Company VS.. G. II.
Clancy, Dallas; Texas and Pacific Rail
wav Company vs.. j. T. Newman, ct al E,
Tarrant; Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe
Railway Company VS.. 7. B. Ellison, Tar
rant; Texas and Pacific Railway Com
pany VS.. J. J. Howard, Tarrant; Nye
Fisher ct al. vs.. James S. Moody, Wichita
T. c.. Nye ct al. vs.. r. +. Gribble,
Wichita; w. L. Moody & Co. VS.. j. a.
C4rroll, assignee, Denton; SIlas Bradley
vs. NJ. A. DeroChe, Parker; A. NJ. KoeD,
administrator, etc vs.. j. P. David
son, guardian, Eastland; Franco-Texan
LandCompany VS.. a. r. Bousselet, Parker !;
u. r. Couts vs.. n. c. Neer, Parker Henry
T. Keyser VS.. JOHN o. Musebach ct al,
Mason; Thomas Eskin VS.. Scott &
LoWeTy. Corcho !; 4. j Peters Saddiery and
Harness Company VS.. SGhoelkoff & Co,
Hill: Missouri Pacific Railway Company
vs.. Mary 4. Lee, Hill; Mary A. Goode ct
al. VS.. A. J Jasper ct ST., Hill; Uilman,
Lewis & Co. We A. j. Jasper ct al, Hill;
George Fl. GlaSsoway VS.. G. w. White,
Falls; Mrs. YOlande Fortune ct al. VS..
William Killebrew, Falls; James NJ.
Stewart VS.. P. II. Anderson ct Gl., Falls :;
j. S. Brown & Co. vs.. Leasing, Solomon
( Rosenthal, Falls; Wilson Reed ct al.
vs. J. B. ADpleby ct al, Falls; c. 2. Lan-
caster vs. F. Il. Ayers, Bell; Gulf, Col
orado and Santa Fe Railway Company VS..
John McCorquodale, Milan.