Los Angeles daily herald., 1887-09-06
DAILY HERALD.
THE COURTS.
MONDAY, September 5.
Superior Court-Departmen One,
Cheney. J.,

superior Court-Department One,
Cheney, J.
People vs.. B. A. Stephsns-Caust
continued for the session.
People vs.. Mike Golden-Defend'
ant pleads not guilty-Bail $4,000.
People VS.. Flores-Time for sen.
tence continued to September IL, al
10 A. NJ.
Upon motion of the District Attor-
ney informations were filed charging
Francisco Ballestero and John Mace
with assault with a deadly weapon
Geo. Clark, VIM. Best, Joreph Kelley
and George Tracey with grand lar.
ceny, and G. M. Tnsley and Fon
Yuen with NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. 8, at
9:30 A. M, was. set for the defendants
o be arraigned.
SET FOR TO-DAY.
People VS.. C.. NJ. Woodruff-10A. M.
Department Two-Gardiner J.'
Estate of Ed. Merrill--Continued
till September II, at 10 A. NJ.
Estate of VIM. Frasher-Continued
till October 3. at 10 A. NJ.
Estate of Louisa Keller--Continued
till October 3, at 10A. NJ.
Estate of Antonio Gonzales-Peti-
ton granted; bond $400.
Estate of Robert Fryer-Continued
till September 10, at 10 A. M.
Estate of Mary G. Parker-Final
account settled and distribution; petit
ton granted for same.
Estate of Thos. A. Clune. Account
settled-Petition for distribution de-
MED and taken under advisement.
Estate of G. r. Wolverton-Con-
tinued until September IL at 10 A. M.
Estate of John H. Seymour-Ac-
count settled as presented; distribu-
ton ordered as prayed for.
Estate Of H. A. Redford-Contin-
ued till September 26 at 10 A. NJ.
Estate of Sarah Neely-Petition
granted. Bond $500.
Estate and guardianship of Annie
Riggs, a minor-Letters issued to Mrs.
Watson. Bond $50.
Estate of S. j. Keefer-Petition
granted and conveyance ordered.
Estate of HI. j. Mayo-Sale ap-
proved; order made confirming the
same.
Estate of A. Felis-Petition granted
Will admitted. Bond 5000.
SET FOR TODAY.
In re, Estates of John Schaeffer,
Christopher Action and Peter Hen
nenped.
In re, guardianship of the Rule
minors.
Department Four-HuttOn, j.
Davies Henderson Lumber Com
pany vs.. Dry Sparkling Champagne
Company-Defendants allowed Is
days to answer.
Glenn VS.. Saxton-Demurrer over
ruled-15 days granted to answer.
Bath vs.. Valdez-Motion for new
trial denied.
Leonis VS.. Mesa-Passed for the
session.
David Herman of St. Louis was ad-
mittcd to practice at the bar.
The following demurrers were con-
tinued till September 18th: Los An
geles Infirmary vs. Los Angeles City;
Davies Henderson Lumber Company
vs.. Tewhey ct al; Darcy vs.. Briefly
ct al. ; Sepulveda vs.. Bixby; Denglada
vs.. Elias ct al; Kohler VS.. Los An
geles, Electric Railroad Company |;
Mule. VS.. Wehl; Hollenbeck vs.. Hol-
land; Dominguez VS.. Sanford James
VS.. Mills; t'nnroe VS.. Ellis; Damon
vs.. Conkling; Chapman VS.. Kenney
ct al Griffin vs.. Griffin; Scarborough
vs.. Scarborough; Stone vs.. Kays !;
Shatto ct al. VS.. Loughlin; Southern
California Land Bureau VS.. Fogel /;
Elliott VS.. Flash Burlingame VS.. Row.
land; Keep vs.. Keep and Putney VS..
Mesmer.
The following demurrers we're con-
tinued until September 10th:
Cohn qs. Michner ct al and Harper
Reynolds Co. VS.. Scott.
The following demurrers were over
ruled and ten days granted to answer:
Sepulveda vs.. Tononi; Pallett vs..
White; Niles ct al VS.. Valla ct al. !;
Banning ct al. vs.. Banning Baldwin
VS.. Welsh; Gage vs.. Hobbell ct al. !;
Banning VS.. Banning ct al; Los An
geles Storage Company and Lumber
Company vs.. Gridley; Brock vs.. No
Ian ct al. Ankers VS.. Wilson ct al. !;
Mulkey VS.. Vanader Kuhlin; Bigelow
vs.. City, and Williams VS.. Maxwell.
The following demurrers we're taken
under advisement:
Mariner vs.. Dennison; Vejar ct al.
W.. Mound City Land and Water Com
pany; Stone vs.. Billings ct al; Stone
VS.. Adams; Webb VS.. Webb; Levy
vs.. White; Senter VS.. Monroe, and
Stone vs.. Park ct al.
Sanders VS.. Franklin ct al.-Strick-
en- off the calendar.
Woods vs.. Woods-Decree for plain
tiff as prayed for.
Bell VS.. Figueroa-Demurrer sus-
tanned; ten days granted to answer.
SET FOR TO-DAY.
Vejar vs.. Mound City Land and
Wator Company.
Barclay VS.. Beach ct al.
The Minor Courts.