Lancaster daily intelligencer. [volume] (Lancaster, Pa.) 1864-1928, 1887-08-13

OODV0O
Duv 80 AAeRsnsoS.
o onU1oos = m = Asa
NO Aopsne VlsUss - Aaso
- - - Wlasnno . RsssA
oun 0nDsno - Vsna.
49, - nasaas ssle e,ssoeh whsn
8oD1 . - Jone tssa Wseo de-
nsssns spsnssas wsss delivered b
ID - = - sss.hs q JoAa ssssss
4oppnD hovln0 beoA DISPOSED ol, %
- 0ooe - ~ opening q the
y - HllsaAsaA tswsaAip rosa suis ~
uno = ~ Hopogt q vioWoes WesU sss.
10 - - rGposs q viswsss was -
n0euWsalsA ~ AAsn ossn6ss. -
: ~ boeombomao0one "a iDdIst0sut de-
uU1 - - le1eaAanl = tssasurse ot
1o1 49, G 90 FslloWA u y alleged,
- 4 hnWo eu0 q mooeg. His coun.
Snoo1 - Quege1oa tAae - W1s indicssd
- WFoag seeeioa oe The criminal
~ ouuxs also took that view Of the
= nClonn u1eod aa4 suseainod the demurrer.
Il = - eBonoo q Ohafios Dsoohlss; deceased,
49, ensepeuas % the Widows appsaisemsot
- dl10lasd end ths appraissmsot sbso-
4 10y ena1fmed.
A n sssspssoas 10 The sudisor'srsport in the
ounoe q Jseob q Shifk were dismissed and
- SUpot Wae ooaafmed.
n ~ esoaeo of 3. Henry Rope. the ex.
! oupo1oa0 - the appsaisemeot Of ooOO for the
+ oono0t q ne minor children, wsre dismiesed
y 0RuNnfnnwAmAe and
& nsmo6.
Il ~ suit Of ]. W. johnson ~ II. Beno-
- ood ". H Seipie, the rule 10 show cause
5 ~ 4 r. should nos b stayed, the juds-
ono0t opooed and Defendants lot into Q de-
oDase w. DISCHARGED.
n ~ s1it a TIE borough Of Mannheim VI
A01eoW !. Ougley, TIE rule 10 strike ofi lien
4 ~ nade absoiuts and lien stricken Oh.
n Ne assigned sstats of Henry Stroll
- WieA The rule 10 show cause why the
o1nGDoo's aocount ahould not b opened was
i Uo1o ohoolute.
Reward 0ipgrich, guardian, ~ John b
06oAl, guardiao, oass stated to ascertsin
4 vho = entitled 70 . certain Legacy. Judg-
uent was entered in favor of defendant
IAe city Of Lancaster ~ Julian Ehrmsn,
go Goneod 70 ascertain whether the defend.
- = liable for the city tax on the property
4 owne0 ~ Jsoo6 Shirk and purchased by
3ASnaA Judgmsnt sotsrsd In favor Of the
~ NJ the amount Of tax aseeosed.
JeAgs PassssssoS Opnssos.
JnAes Patesrson delivered opinions in the
11loWinG cases
Wileu1, Broa 4 Co, " John F. Griel,
David b Ettla, james B. Thomss and Jscob
4 0slsl jh, trading - Grisl, Ettls 4 Co, rule
& = sAow cause Why Judgement should not b
eUAA Hrk = nsAA
4 0slo1, IT,, for want Of Q suflctent afidavit OF
& 1oeoooA Rule made aboolutA
~ exceptions 10 the suditos's report in
- ssoa1s Of 1. L. Rsddig and wife were dis
O1s1o4 and report conarmed.
Tue sxeeptioos 10 the auditors report In the
n Ooneo q Elisaooeh Huber were dismissed,
I'D ~ report We absolutely c,nfirmsd.
xAo auditoe's report In the estate of Samuel
0nbee Was recommittod to the auditor to q.
ezAia soms additional faots - to one OF the
9u6g0eais In dhputA
n ~ suit Of Jscob @. 0arman, sdminis.
z tB11n9 a David Garman, deceased, Va
Uphsa1m 0axman, The rule 70 show cause Why
Il asesiTs sale should not b set ssids w,s dis.
GhaEped.
u ne sstsss Of Henry Shelly, deceased,
- sule 70 show cause why letters testamen
= tngY iasusd to Reuboo Shelly, should not b
revoked, was made sbsolutA
In tbs suit a John Hildshrand ~ John
Sasse KuoAsy the rule 10 open judgment
We discharged.
The exception to the suditor's report in the
esta1s OF william Furlow, deceased, was dis,
missed.
4 new trial IVES refused In the suit Of
Daniel Nunsmschsr ~ George Walton,
t1ied some tims ego and In which the verdict
q tho jury Was in favor Of plaintiff.
In the suit OF Samuel Echtsrnacht admin.
Z B1satoe Of Jssss Hoffman ~ Berjsmin Long.
neekoe judgment We entsred In favor Of
plaintiff ior the amount claimed.
In the matter OF the opening OF Grant
slrsst from North Christian 70 North Queen
stseses, the rule granted to show cause Why
- ahsolute decree OF confirmation should
nj b entered - to the report Of viewers was
Oade sbsolute.
cuRRENT BUsINRss TRANsAcTED.
Issues we're granted 70 ossosrtain the owner.
ahip Of certain property levied upon By the
sheriff, In which Minnie Sus snyder and
OhStsttana Snyder were made plaintifYs and
John Hildebrand the defendant
Issues were also granted TO ascertain the
oWuesship OF property levied upon, In which
Elmer Grove and Annie Grove were made
plainti6s and Susan Brubaksr and :Tobiss
0gubakss, her husband, dsiendantA
4 aimilar issue Was granted In which Jouas
Oado PLAINTIFF and james b. Htsckmsn do.
1Dadant
A subpons In divorcs vas allowed in the
suit q Mary Biser " Jesse Bilxsr ON the
ground of dsssrtton.
\ eubpoos Wa also allowed In the suit OF
Amy Bent ~ John Bent On the ground OF
0usl treatment