Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1887-11-22
SUPREME COURT.
IN BANK.

MONDAY, November DIST.
Court met at P. NJ. Present-Searls c. j.
presiding; McKinstry, j.. Thornton, j.: sharps,
tein, J.; Temple, j.; Paterson, j.: Mcfarland,
j.; Spencer, Clerk Fiusler, Bailif.
EN- parte DINING, on habeas corpus-Argued
by Otto SUDDEN for petitioner, Kirk for respond
ent and submitted
Ex parte Owen, On habeas corpus-Argued by
Gray for respondent, Beordan for petitioner,
and submitted. Ordered that writ be dismissed
and prisoner remanded.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
Court met pursuant to adjournment Present
-SearlS G. j., presiding: Mckinstry, J.; Temple
j.: Paulsell, Deputy Clerk; Finkler. Bailiff.
12,l23-Scott ct al. VS.. Snowden-0n motion of
Slmouds ordered appellant be allowed twenty
days to file brief; cause to be thereupon submit
u, 162- Roberts vs. Dunsmuir ct al-Areued
by buckley Tor appellant, Barnes for respondent
and submitted.
l2,17O-strickland VS.. Holbrooke-On motion
OF Cross ordered respondent be allowed twenty
days to file brief, appellant twenty DAYS 10 re-
ply; cause to be thereupon submitted.
12,l94-Rose VS.. Nevada and Grass Valley ".
q L. Coon motion of Simonds for appellant.
ordered that the appeal herein be and the same
is hereby dismissed.
l2,2lS-Peterson VS.. Weissbein ct al-On mo-
ton OF Slmonds, ordered appellant be allowed
twenty days to file brief, respondent ten days
to reply; cause to be thereupon submitted.
n,74-Byrne, executor, ETC. vs. Reed ct al
On motion of futile, ordered that appellant be
allowed thirty days 10 file brief, respondent
twenty days to reply; cause to be thereupon sub
mitted.
1l,s99-Wilson VS.. Atkinson.-On motion of
futile. cause ordered to be continued.
l240-Applegate VS.; Simpson-On motion of
futile ordered appellant be allowed twenty
days to file brief, respondent twenty days to re-
ply; cause TO be thereupon submitted
l2,2l5-W heeler ct al. VS.. West ct al.-On mo-
the term.
12,36S-On motion of futile, ordered respond-
ent be allowed twenty days to file brief, appel
liant ten days to reply; cause to be thereupon
submitted.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
Court met pursuant to adjournment Present
-Ihornton. j., presiding; Searls, C. j.: SharD-
stein, j.; Williams, Deputy Clerk; Washburn
u, 234-Adams administrator. VS.. Lambard-
On motion of Fox, ordered respondent be al
lowed thirty days to file brief appellant twenty
Gays 10 10 reply; cause to be thereupon submitted
l2,2l6-Morgan VS.. Hecker On motion of
Hundley, ordered cause be submitted on briefs
on file.
l2,2l7EBqtte County vs., Morgan ct al.-or-
uered that Freeman IL Bates be allowed ten DAYS
to lille brief, and both respondent and appellant
to have twenty days to file reply brief
l2,231-In re. Allen, an insolvent debtor-On
briefs on file. VA
L, 26S--Longnecker VS.. his Credtors-Pursuant
70 stlpuiatlon hIed herein ordered appellant be
allowed twenty days to file brief, respondent
twenty days to reply, appellant ten days to re-
PLY thereto; cause to be thereupon submitted
2,326-Gale VS.. Best ct al.-On motion of
on file. va "i-e-'
l2,35l-Farnum VS.. Hefner-On motion of
Reordan, ordered cause be submitted upon
briefs on file. f
L; S7O-Rapp ct al. VS.. Spring Valley Gold Co.
ct al.-on motion of Reordan ordered cause be
submitted upon briefs on file
l2,SI|Chlyell ct al. VS.. Spring Valley Gold
Co. ct al.-Same order
l2,266- Montgomery VS. Spring Valley NJ. 4 l.
co.-Argued by Hundley for appellants Rodgers
for defendants, and submitted.
%, 1887. --'sA