New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1887-10-25
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.

e.
wAsnSloS oct - decision vas rendered by tic SAT
premc art Of the United states to-day n the three cases u
the United states appellant agt the states OF LOUISIANA
Altar,a MI-.sppL These were suit, brought 10 ihe
CONT Of Claims Nv named 10 recover from tie
Unite per cent OF the net proceeds OF the sales Of
public land, cr hnit and also 10 recover ndonl-
ny for swamp Land, purchased by individuals tho proceeds
If vii l were b. statute directed applied far
c.,4ry to tc lands by means OF lc'ees
anddaus Tho maintained that the Court OF
Claims had 40 Jur.,cion TO ct'rm no cause IN winch
- f. ,e tnc tuci -tac-, th' art ~ tie claims were
barrel ~ te ~ltlit a. Ilmiaon aud That $40 Nnite4
stt., r4,,nt,l.i make counter clam 49,
count Of ilc states OF Louisiana AllYaua ani Mf''-.ppl
under the Act Of August. ls6l.
The court Of au. decided that bad lurs ctou. MT
tie al.putei items not barred hy tie statute O. nlA
,i. ami that i,, -eoH or countor cl4ln o,uiI
lowed oolt 4nns TIE judgment opinion ty Justice
Ilrd
court go Day denied tie motion to ad, made
Fac .at Of chicago. 90 four Iro-Dt ou liquor cases rom
Iowa and one n m Gcoi-a standing on hr docket Sos
1913 and oYI tol0,l inclusive Tley Involve the same
questions which presented ~ the cace Of Sehod and
liAgen arc.dy argued The AtorBcy.Ge Of Kauss,
who by reason o 4pprecn- dd not APP 10 argue
the Latter case orally. IN tic court room tbs morning and
n ell p-tt leave TO make orl argument now, not
lthanding that court has already taken the
case uudc Adyls-cn The question presented y ills
sicgAl, as extremely Important since u involves the con.
additionally OF all Tho prohibition legislation since tho
adoption Tie NINti Amendment. which docs not pfoyte
fof compensation 10 brewers ana dstcrs for the value Of
Tie property destroyed 10y e ioFcbs closing Of Their esab
l.~hmcnt-
Attorney General Garland submitted to the court to-day
motion to advanced for early hearing the Of the
receiver the First National Bank Of Buffalo against H.
bridge spsulng Others which Involve, tho question Of
the responsibility the directors OF National banks neg
ngence IN performance Of their duto' 1ho motion to
advance is ma At request OF tho Controller OF
+ Icnoy.
The other business transacted the Supreme Cont to
IS follows:
amino nm 81 Mt efq
appellant agt ne b'kel saly-re compan' Apleai from
met Of Virginia Decree affirmed with COSTS OPINION by
10 I5,s Ofu,iobei Terra. Io,G Tho sun Mutual Insur
Company oi >r"pf aus. appellant afL INC krrnlL
state, tna EASTERN psiuc o. louisiana Petition for
80 - The Orient Mutual Insurance Company plaintiff
sGt Jon : adams IN otner IN error TO The CIR;
9hii con-, "i ' ,,. i , W." w., and ,n, 81
/ otlnion by Jn,tIce Harlan.
Tsyt"a SI c5a aiIo oa S Of BE- - Ts
Tor he Nor'h.rn bi,tr, o. ii99,S Jnaf"ent affirmed
10. IoI& rhe huntington cedar It1 1 and NoIlhcrn
rusc ApgSal f;m ne ,cmt court 81 the n'9d
wani OF Jurisdiction. opinion by chcf Justice MA,o
40 1888 ii.aA Mercy appellant agt Jo@n w. LOCK
Esston pi.t,t Of imam psm.,od tor want OF urie.
80 AZ rryr E"s r[EG 10 1 Tsc aFi ,n n u,
Boston and others pisinn error agt Daniel l. pemmon
Motion advance Tor argument with nos. 10 AMI 1870
30 III. The United states appellant. as tho SAN Jacn
down gncn at tho head NJ the call on the nr't day the
court 10 u session after the holiday recess
20 81. William /. Powell. planun IN error agt tho
Common ea Of Pennsylvania Motion to advance granted
ths frs day the court
following S7I
40 nltci states appellant, agt kate u Nc
Ianghlu Motion advance grantni aud
down argument at tho foot otto call on the h't Mon
December notL
No 20 The & Gfggs Manufacturing Company
appellant agt Leonard A. Spraguc Argued by VI. l.. Phil
Ipp sogc t. Terry for appellant aud by C. t. Mitchell
Tor appellee -, -, II,
30 Tho Unei stats plaintin III error agt the PM
adclphla anu Reading KAiTOid Company PASSED. until To
no :g. The North Ponusvvalia Railroad Company plain
TN In error Commercial National Bank oil Chicago
! Pa seTu Ma. y Of Rule IA. 20
DOOlan others. pAintns IN error. az
William Is. Car. Argument begun 10y Mich hnllanoy 70
plaintiffs IN error
Adjourned until to-Horrrow.