National Republican., 1887-10-27
TIM COURT RECORD.

United States Supreme Court.-The following
business was transacted yesterday:
Julius 8. Grinnell, of Chicago, ILL.,; Ebert 8.
Smith, Of Springfield, Ill, and VIM Crosby, OF
Livermore, CAL, were admitted TO practice.
No. 934. The State OF Kansas ex rel. J. r.
Tufts. assistant attorney general, appellant,
bradford, attorney general OF Kansas, for leave
10 make oral argument denied.
This Ia the Kansas prohibition case which
was argued in behalf OF the liquor sellers on
the second day OF the present term, but which
was not argued orally IN behalf of the state at
that time on account OF some misuuderstand
Ing or Misrepresentation on the parts of its at
torney general. The court by this decision,
refuses to allow him to mako oral argument
now.
:, No. 1912. The United States appellant, vs..
No. 1883. The United States appellant, VS.. R.
W. Allen. Submitted under rule ~ by Mr..
Attorney General Garland, Mr.. Assistant At
tSrpsy General tn,nd Howard SnS MI pe%s
aud Mr.. John Paul Jones for the appeees.
No. 1872 The Pennsylvania Railroad Com
pany, plaintiff IN error, vs.; Henry L Janeway
CT al. In error to the circuit court of the
United states for the district of New Jersey.
Dismissed per stipulation. Clerks costs TO be
paid by plaintiff In error , a,
=. No 80. The United States, appellant, vs.. Ma
thilde de Morant ct al, Argument continued
by Mr.: Solicitor General jerks for the appel
liant, Mr., Abram .wintersteen for appellees,
and concluded by Mr.. Collector General jerks
No Is. The Baltimore and Potomac Railroad
Company, plaintilf In error. vs. The District
of Columbia. Dismissed with costs.
No. q. j. Nj. Kennedy ct al. appellants. VS..
BARLEY Lamb at al. Appeal from the circuit
court Of the United States for the district of
Nebraska. Dismissed with costs.
No. 3s. The New Orleans Water Works Com
pany, plaintiff in error, VS.. The Louisiana su-
gar Refining Company ct al. Argument COM
menced by Mr.. ]. r. Beckwith for plaintiff in
error and continued by Mr.. s. Teskle Wallis
for the defendants In error.
Adjourned until to-day.
Court in General Term-Cnlof Justice Biug-
ham and Justices Hagner and James Mary
+. Crist vs.. Henry G, Graft ct al; argued aud
submitted. Assignment for to.day--Nos SO,
81, 90, 90, 98.
Circuit tCourt--JustceM Montgomery Phillips
vs.. yermillioni verdict for defendant. Wood
VS.. Murphy; judgment below affirmed. Mary.
land Coal Company vs.. Brandt; of calender.
Assignment for to. day--Appeals, 6, IS; caleu-
OAR S9l &C, 81, 62 63, O., Co. II. ~, a. 70, 70, ~
Equity Court-Jus,ieo Merrick-- --zieglet vs..
dered. Schneider vs. Burke: rule on trustee
returnable Nov. 8, 1887, granted. Hume vs.
Meyer; Chas. L. Wise allowed to interfere and
reference to auditor. Matthews VS., Wharton;
commission to gettestimony ordered to reissue.
Rebly w. Diver; leave to withdraw amended
cross bill. Morrison VS.. Canton Surgical and
Dental Chair Company; bill reinstated, with
featuring Company VS.. Canton Surgical and
Dental Chair Company; bill reinstated, with
leave to plead nunc pro tune.
Criminal Court-Justice Cox-Mary ].
Mcbride and j. II. Mcfarland, arson; wit
nesses examined for the government