New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1887-05-03
THE COURTS.
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

UNIFIED SUfhEME COUhI.
DECISION IN A BANK TAX OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES
OF SHELLS.
WASHINGTON May dec rendered by the Su.
OF the United States day in the bank tax case
of Hattie r. Stanley executrix plaintiff in agt the
Board Of Supervisors OF Albany n Y The original plaintiff
IN this case Edward Stanley citizen Of Illinois ana
claims assignee OF certain shareholders OF the Ma
tona Albany Exchange Bank He brought suit to recover
back alleged to have been Illegally collected
from upon their shares In that bank during the
from 1874 1879 complained that tho by
rule prescribed by emsee tho shares Of the Ma
tona Albany Exchange Bank higher rate than stock In
other situated the city, The rule adopted by
the all shares OF stock in State and
the city OF Albany irrespective OF
their actual or market value.
This court affirmed the Judgment of the court below.
decision also rendered in the case OF John F. Hart
error to The United states Circuit Court for the Eastern Dis
s court OF a s en ss shells 20 duty
manufactures OF shells something more must be done
tSsT.O %p synsS sS SrSr
A similar decision the same grounds was rendered IN
OF artraDft against Winters which presents tho
decision rendered in the q George Snow and
others against the Lake shore and Michigan southern Rail
for the Northern District Of NeEYOrk TINS was suit
sSGsh ny inc az Saf granted June for an
Improvement bellrlngers The conrt below dis.
n s G TS 'S With AD ''
The other decisions to-day as follows:
No lGS-Theodore MCGOWAN and others, etc. plaintiff
the United
District Of Ohio Judgment affirmed with costs ana inter-
80 255-George Mccoy appellant agt Frederick Mel.
son Appeal ciret Of the Unliod states for
teSausd Nth direction to take such further proceedings
shall be in conformity with ie opinion Of this court Mar
splley APpea! from the Circuit Court Of the United
remanGed with direction 70 dismiss the 5 o. Martin
lants without prejudice paid by said appellee
2hS Ms!rCPo@n Railroad al. company 2cn I ee In
error supreme Court Of the District OF columbia
take further proceedings therein in conformity
No. 2SiPTho NewJersey Steamboat Company plaintiff in
agt Leonard ~ Brockct In error TO the creu Court
Judgment affirmed with costs and interest .ou,. go,
ricszerT Fitch and another etc Appeal from the Circuit
Court OF the United states for the district Of G99ser se
no. i5S~Tiery Wright plaintiff in error. agt D II Rose
berry and another In error TO the supreme Court OF me
temanded with ustrat lions for further proceedings
in accorlance with the opinion of this court No.. ,to
Washington and Georgetown Railroad Company In error 10
the supreme Court OF the District OF Columbia Judgment
No 22orhe Peninsula Iron COMPANY ct al appellants
for tho southern District OF reversed with
Tor want Of Jurisdiction ant without prejudice ~,
Anderson ct al In error 70 he Circuit Court United
the District OF California Judgment antmel Win
states Tor tho northern District Of California.
error agt Morsans Louisiana and Texas Railroad and
sa@seD TG%gany q al District Of louisiana Decree
30 i7i-Edwarl Lees a al appellants. agt Anderson
Fowler. Appeal the Circuit court Of the Ihiteu
states FOR tie Northern District Of Illinois Decree arnou
win costs by divided court
Tho other On to-day was as follows
No l332-Iho state OF Kansas ex rel j. T. uts asfHnt
ATTORNEY GENERAL etc. appellant agt Iebold ana itagein
granted AMI assigned iOF argument
o N the second diy o. next term. d.,
IOig-Berirand Slloy plaintln In error agt Simon
Bloch Motion dismiss or alitn denied.
No 3jg-Wllllam ]. Powell plaintiff In error agt mo
Commonwealth OF Pennsylvania Motions TO dismiss OF ahr
No 3gi-The Baxter Mount Gold Mining Company. agt
Henry Patterson and others Motion 20 reDsnto case on
oil costs OF motion u docket anu
ii smiss am OF this motion. - ,,.,,.
No 27I The intel states appellantagt George T. White
Appeal from the Court OF the United states ior tho
District Of California. Dismissed -, ,,..,.
No 34S-Wlam H. Tompkins. appellant agt the Little
Rock and Fort smith Railroad Company and others, 800
Aud No 3lg-Wnam \ Williams appellant agtthe Lite
Rock Mississippi River Texas Railway Company aud Others
OF counsel court and not 10
be called before November Is. next -. .,,,,
No 2-7-Maurice DANDY. appellant, agt r. NJ. MatDe
com ssoner Argument continued by A. J. Wharf ot
n appellant Attorney General Maury TOT te
by Amos BroadDaK for the appellant
W Drorel George -hlras IT, aud Rassea. Brown Tor o
n error John DaLs or the defendant IN error
NO. 2SO-Charlcs BonZger and others phinths ~ error
AIT William Collector Argued by X d. MUS,
for plaintiff and submitted by SOLICITOR Ieneta
Jenk, for defendant IN error. , ~,
No 2S2-The 81 Louis Iron Mountain and Southern Ran
way Company plaintiff error agt r. H. Nickes ATS1el
John the plaintiff In error and submitted ny
r. W Compton fol tic defendant III orror'