The intelligencer. [volume] (Lexington, Mo.) 1887-1891, 1887-12-03
December Term.

lar pAY-pEcKMBER 5rH, 1887.
/. Robt. C.. Greer vs.. George Youngs. &C
; 10. A. Wilson. administrator VS.. Grow
5. Inter State &. T. BY. Co. vs. D. e. Weld
man, ct al. to assess damages.
4. Inter State r. T. Ry. Co. VS.. M. r. May
nsrd & W al e E a smssb d Hso B + Brothers, appel
6. Thos. Nave VS.. Johanna Nelson, appel
liant, appeal. 10
ID DAY-DrcEMsER srH. s1ss7.
I, 10. A. Wilson, administrator, VS.. Thos
j. Hook, vendors lien; bill of exceptions t
s. John e. Burden. administrator, vs. Chas
9. Henry Stoggemilier vs.. Henry Stinens
ejectment; continued by defendant at his cost
10. State use Bascom, assignee ETC.. vs.. VIM
r. Jackson. ct al, damages
IL. The Gregory Grocer Co., appellant, vs.
e Nv w. 81 sr1 W.. i BPssan VS.. Jos. l.. Hutchinson
Is Samuel n. Scott Va. James W. Sullivan
note.
Sd pAY-DrcEMBER 7rH. 1857.
II. NJ. Il. Glasgow, appellant, VS.. Robt
| Graham, appeal; jury failed to agree.
15. American Bank ys. Thomas =. campbell
is. Jerry Proctor Va. Albert LOOMS. &C
count; jury failed to agree: NJ D Nv r.
H. James C.. hcGrew vs.. MO. +. ny. 20.
is. Benz. Elliott. admir-. appellant. VS.. &
is. Jas. sidenstrlker. interpleader in case o
| Elliott. admir-, appellant, appeal; interplea.
20. Home Insurance Co., appellant. VS.. Ben
Elliott. admir-, appeal:
G.. Keith, note.
4rH D~AY-DKcEMBER srH, 1887.
q, Clarence Graves ct al VS.. Amos Arson
q. James D. Ish VS.. Mary Hsnley ct al
"a. nc. Wallace ct al. vs.. Docia A. Youni
Is. Henry G. Lunnsn VS.. Geo H. Moore e
is. H. G. Francisco. appellant. vs.. John E
n. joseph A. whitsett. appellant. VS.. Wal
% N. NJ. Robinson, appellant, ". Thos. J
%. james H B. NJ. Ferran VS.. Gee. F
Maitland ct al, two notes
9TH pAY-DEcEMBER 9Th, 1887.
30. State use John Huxel vs. Thomas E
81 Ollie A.. Peacock ct al vs.. James W
Fitzgerel et al. partition for report.
50 Herman Echelmeyer va. Emile Echel
meyer. divorce; answer and cross bill filed.
u oLdkC o. 0ook6hCCs Q ooc- "
Bowman ct vi. on bond.
35. Railey & Burney vs. Il. G. Francisco
legal services; answer and reply died w,,.
ersOn, eiectment; answer filed.
81. Ben Elliott. admir-, vs.. James H. Bum
garner, three notes.
9TH DAY-DEcEMBKR 10TH. 1857.
30 Thomas F. Williams vs.. W. G. Phillips
note; thirty days to file answer.
80. Max Kempf 70. Phoenix Insurance Co.
damages; answer fled.
40. Robt. T. Russell rs. Ben Elliott. admr.
money paid az a se1 6 =: a Ts.CS k a,sa ;asmoss.
answer fled.
~. James c. McGrew VS. Mo. P. Ry. Co.
trover and conversion; answer fled:
{S Ben. Elliott, admir-, Va. A. l.. Maxwell
a. Mccormick H. NJ. Co. We. Chas. D
Sschrlst ct al. note
| AZ. VIM. H. NIpDer vs.. U. A. JONES', re
! yersed and remanded.
ira pAy-DEcEMBRR 18TH. 1887.
IS, Kate Dixon vs. C. Il A. r. B. Co., dam
ages; answer and reply died.
&c. Anna Ashcrait VS.. Otha Ashcraft
| diyorce: default and costs.
Al. John P. Schultz ct al VS.. Joseph Kohne
berger. equity; answer filed and motion 10
costs.
i nsa Si''0'' Aomf' ''oa' demurrer 10 pe'l''0
20. State use Thos. N. Hill etc vs.. Ben
Elliott. admf,. bond; demurrer to petitio
fled.
SO Henry wiumeyer Va. James H. Burris
81. farmers Bank of Odessa vs.. R. 4. u
Hill ct al, note.
sTH pAY-DEcEMBER 18th, 1887.
81. John Lubrecht vs.. Henry Gelzer, not
| and accouni; answer and reply filed.
81 Henry Stefins VS.. Elizabeth StcfiDs
divorce: answsr and GROSS bill and repl
filed.
81 Mp. Ry. Co Vs.. C. Francisco, oh
j~ecuons 10 report filed.
s.: Mo: r. Ry. Go; VS.. Robt. S. DinyiddIe
S.. MOP. Ry. Co: VS.. Lewis ". wernwas
objections to report filed.
s.. James Feddicord, assignee etc., VI
IS. James F. Catron VS.. Henry Nuelle ct al
Rote.
9rH D~AY-DKcEABER 18th, 1887.
80. John Catron VS.. Lewis P. Green ct al
note.
60 Ben. Elliott. admir-. VS.. Chatham E
81. American Bank VS.. w. H. Littlejohn q
e Hawkins & Smith VS.. Barton 4 Brad
81 Sarah E. Self VS.. Henry c. Self, d
vorce.
"a. Sarah E. Egan ct al VS.. James A. CAM
bel ct al, partitions; alias writ issued.
80 Elizabeth NJ. Franks VS.. VIM. M. Frank
divorce.
10ru D~AY-DKcEMBER 18TH, 1851.
s6. Rachel Marshall VS.. James Marshall, di
vorcs.
81. State use Lexington Saving Bank Vi
City Of Lexin gton, mandamus.
IS State use j. G.. Fall vs.. City OF LeXin1
ton, mandamus; peremptory writ ordered.
SO State use Geo. Farrar vs.. City of LexinI
ton, mandamus; peremptory writ ordered.
10. State use Chiles, admir-, Va. City Of lie,
ip2ton, mandamus; peremptory writ ordered.
II. State use Kriehn & Meyer vs.. City
Lexington, mandamus; p~eremptory writ o
dered.
70. State use Goseuisch, executor, vs.. CT
OF Lexington, m~andamus; peremptory vi
ordered.
10. State use Fitzgerald ct al vs.. City of lie
ington, m~andamus; peremptory writ ordered.
a Isaac Neale assignee OF VIM. Lowry, q
signment. continued for settlement.
IS John E. Bascom assignee of C.. '
Grau. assignment.
rs. Theo. Gosewisch, executor, vs.. City
Lrxln gton. motion to r-tax costs.
e ~ Kriehn & Meyer VS.. City of Lexingto
motion to retaX costa.
rs John e. Fall VS.. City of Lexinsto
motion to reteX costs.
? -. Eliza Fitzgerald ct al VS. City of Lexir
ton, motion to retnx costs.
so. W. H.. Chlles, admr IS. City of lie
iEgtGn. motion TO retax costs.
Z 81 Geo Farrar rs. CITY OF LeKipGtt
= molten TO relax costs
D 81. Lexington Savings Bank VS.. City of Ii
q ingIon. motion to retaX costs.
! 81 R. A. Hicklin vs.. City OF Lexingtt
4 motion to retax costs.
* G. Y. Ford VS.. Daniel Flournoy. g
Of NJ n Robinson, punishment on execute
SAX. ". II, Leonard Va. r. L. 4 W.