New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1887-04-02
MR. POVDERLY ON STRIKES.
lie THINKS THEY DO GOOD EVEN WHEN USsUt

lie THINKS THEY DO GOOD EVEN WHEN UNsUC-
CEssFUr-A HINT TO THE MANUFACTURERS
PHILADELPHIA, April (SpeciaD.-ln me 'o"to' -
United Labor Issued to-day from the General HEAD
quarters of Knights Of Labor in this city, Mr. fowuery
has the following say in reference to employers anu
employees:
successful strike undertaken of real grievanre
necessarily directly or indirectly
an one for though il entails much suffering
much m% deeper hole % the relatively IS
well as absolutely Ihe hara snocSs 0 MIN But
the their generaton esPee n
strong enough 70 fight battle TO the bitter endnts
Termination root and br2ge OF a nny mpsnng hat they
alone who doing favor IN giving nury
place where nors Of and successful strikes
reach , iGr @S or a be- good boys
and eschew all unions the terrible knights OF IA
men lie who enters here leaves liberty behind m
etursr are said to be gradually doing wall avail them but
tile The county place WIZ on ,re boes Of workmen
will thor organization into union haI u con-
comitant Of the factory system The order Of The knsts
Lahor yet In It's infancy IS stunning Gay H @ involved
II VIII stand much Some OF those peoPg Tho
reply When iepGsnon na ~ S SSn nsy
WY ASKED they why supposed COW gets on the track
Why" answered john then it will be worse for the
M the Massachusetts, shoe manufacturers make note OF
that before II Is too late
Another editorial paragraph in The journal states
When are legislation regulating inc i ~
portauOn of the pauper element 10 usrp u,nneiy one
Italians we're DISCHARGED from one vessel in the Port O
York on the 2lth OF March
The official call to delegates the Harrisburg Conven,
ton was issued today The convention will assemble Oh
April in National Hall
BOYCOTTING DENOUNCED FROM THE BENCH.
NEw-HAvEx, April 1.-The opinion Of the state SUI
preme Court In the noted boycott case OF tne 0.a'o
against Gdden and others announced today lhc
court in its opinion says:
Do the acts which alleged the defendans consprea 20
do fall within the prohibition OF the act OF iate
pose to threaten (he oycOu) %
The Carrington Publishing Company to compel IL ag,~' re
woLmen of It's choice which had legal Ilght 10 @
and TO do an act lempoy ne H'eha's % r 70 abs,an
doing There be but one answer To the aueso" Inv
acts proposed clearly prohibited by the statute
The court in of long discussion oil TIC con
spiracy laws, says:
1t seems strange in country which law intrferes 80
little liberty of the individual that II should s oo
carry he poses may do what ne VII MIN
hisown so long rs he docs nothing unawu Ston for
such announcement should be not an attempt ny Hh LII
mcnf 10 interfere with the rights OF CITIZENS nor by e u
=. powerful 10 Cypress poor but attempt ny a,ho
body OF workngmrn to control 10y means h''lo il any 49,
shan force. the action OF employers.
After "A strong arragnmcnt OF the principles OF the poy
colt as dangerous and subversyc OF all law and order the
court continues:
We also notice alleged that the conspiracy con
or ~ NO, e,y dene Il is frequently spoken Of pass
only let alone policy thdi aMal 81 ~ i,
twill be md anything n It criminal ". may
gather idea of us real mrahlnE hoM1'er' ~ steS
10 the circumstances Ia which the "ou OF +, moi
thing call boycott originally s.snihei
used the word IN original sense IN it, Application 10
harrington publishing omp.ny tnete .sr ~ ~, I,licye they
used II In modified As importation nom
country may presume that they intended 1t IN m'''