Grant County herald. [volume] (Lancaster, Wis.) 1850-1968, 1887-10-06
COURT CALENDAR,

The cases given below are in the same
order as they will appear on the court
calendar to be issued by the Clerk of the
Court:
ISSUE OF FACTS TO BE TRIED BY JURY.
Peter Flynn as adm VS. Mary Flynn,
ct al, I j Brooks for pltff, John ID Will
son for delft. Foreclosure mortgage.
II Hoffmeister VS. G Ban RRCo,
III Buchner and Clark & Mills for pltff,
Cameron & Losey and Orr & Lowry for
deft. Relief.
Jane + B Simpson VS. Geo Fischofer
ct al, Carter & Cleary for pltff, Bushnell
& Watkins for defts, Fischofer & Snec-
lode, Cameron, Losey & Traer Orr &
Lowry for r r Co. Money demand.
j q Flint VS. FL Powers ct al. Brooks
& butcher for pitt, j d Wilson for deft
Appeal.
John A Tolman Co VS. Meyer Bros,
Clark and Mills for pltff, John d Wilson
for def. Money demand.
The Milwaukee Harvester Company
VS. Thos Tomas and Matt Lomas, Orr a.
Lowry, John d Wilson and w + Carter
for pltff, Brooks & butcher and Bushnell
4 Watkins for deft. Replevin No 2.
The Milwaukee Harvester Company
vs. Thos Tomas and Matt Tomas, Orr e.
Lowry, John ID Wilson and w Z Carter
for pltff, Brooks q butcher and Bushnell
& Watkins for deft. Replevin l.
James Tenant VS. Ora Richards ct al,
Brooks & butcher and Bushnell & Wat
kins for pltff, Orr & Lowry, j ID Wilson
and W L Carter for def. Money
demand
Isaac Lcmas VS. Ora Richards ct al,
Brooks d butcher and Bushnell & Wat
kins for plff, Orr g. Lowry, j ID Wilson
and W + Carter for deft. Money de-
mand.
Matthew + Tomas VS. Ora Richards ct
al, Brooks& butcher and Bushnell g.
Watkins fer pltff, Orr e. Lowry, j d
Wilson and w E Carter for deft Money
demand.
The Milwaukee Harvester Company
VS. Thos Lomas and Matt Tomas, Orr &
Lowry, j d Wilson and w L Carter for
plttf, Brooks & butcher and Bushnell &
Watkins for deft. Replevine No 8.
James Lomas VS. Alferd Guernsey,
Brooks & butcher for pltff, j d Wilson
for deft. Appeal.
Ira Griswold VS. Thos Fry Bushnell g.
Watkins for pltff, Clark & Mills for deft
Appeal.
Anton Wydish VS. John Hudek, A w
& w + Bell for pltff, Bushnell q Wat
kins for deft Relief.
Thos Edge VS. Ora Richards ct al,
Brooks & butcher and Bushnell &, Wat
kins for pltff, Orr & Lowry, j d Wilson
and w E Carter for delft. Money de-
mand. 49,
Joseph NJ Burton VS. Walter Allen,
Orr & Lowry for pltff, Bushnell & Wat
kins for deft. Personal damages.
In matter of est of Conrad LANCE,
decd, Jno LANCE, adm app'llnt VS. Jno
Olinger, Caim'nt, Orr & Lowry for
pltff, Bushnell & Watkins for delft.
Appeal from count court.
In matter of est of Conrad LANCE,
decd, Jno LANCE, adm app'lln VS. Jno
Olinger, ct a Claimants, Orr q Lowry
for pltff, Bushnell & Watkins for deft.
Appeal from county court.
Matthias Lampert VS. Martin Oswald
ct al, John d Wilson for pltff, Brnoks
& butcher Brooks for def. Money
demand
The Mccormick Harvesting Machine
Co VS. Allison E Gates, Spensley & Nc
nhon for pitt, L Brooks for def. APP
peal.
VIM Z Bell VS. John + Manning, A w
Bell for pitt, Orr &c Lowry for deft.
Money demand.
Julia Lanaaan VS. VIM Nelson, L j
Brooks for pltf, w G Palmer for deft
Appeal.
BE Washburn VS. Gustave Meyer, l.
j Woolley for pltf, I J Brooks for deft.
Appeal.
Fred zach W Lyman Mcconnell ct al,
Bushnell & Watkins for pltff, Orr &
Lowry for def. Trespass.
Mary T Murphy VS. Owen Murphy,
j ID Wilson fer pltff. Brooks & butcher
for deft. Promissory note.
John F Cleary VS. Frank Kluck ct al
Carter & CIeary for pltff, A w & w L
Bell for def. Personal damages.
Mary j Wilkinson VS. Jonas Rawson,
Clark 81 Mills for pltff, A w & w Z Bell
for deft. Money demand.
Mary Ann Brandon VS. G NJ & St P
Ry Co, John d Wilson for pltff, Brooks
& butcher for def. Money demand
Rob't A Wilson VS. John Hunt ct al,
Bushnell & Watkins for pltff, A w &
w E Bell for deft. Foreclosure mort
gage.
School district No 4. Platteville vs.
Fay r Chase as surviving partner etc, A
w g. w Z Bell for pltff, Murphy &
Gardner and Carter & Cleary for deft.
Money demand.
John c Knapp VS. Julia r Young,
Bushnell e. Watkins for pltff, Clark &
Mills for deft. Money demand.
ISSUES OF FACT TO BE TRIED BY COURT.
Mary Louisa Hockett VS. John Hockett
ct al, Carter & Cleary for pltff, w III
Beebe for defts. Divorce.
Geo Andrew VS. Chas G Alexander,
John ID Wilson for pltff, Bushnell &
Watkins for deft. Foreclosure land
Henry Rewey VS. Addison Rewey,
Carter & Cleary for pltff, Bushnell &
Watkins for deft. Foreclosure mort
gage.
Miller Cissna & Co VS. Lyman A Pow
ers Clark & Mills for pltff, j d Wilson
for deft. Money demand.
r Barrett vs. Lyman A Powers, Clark
e. Mills for pltff, j ID Wilson for deft
Money demand.
Olive Penberthy VS. Joel II Penberthy
Clark Sc Mills for pltff, Henderson.
Hurd & Daniel and Orr 81 Lowry,
for deft. Divorce.
Ezra Abrahams vs. Smith Jarrett.
Clark & Mills for pltff, Orr & Lowry for
deft. Foreclosure land contract.
In last Re will of James Prideaux
decd. w Ii Prideaux propondent VS..
john G Clark as guardian ad litum
appellant Orr & Lowry for pltff. Bush
nell & Watkins and l.. j. Arthur for
deft. Appeal from county court.
Henry Lewis ct al VS. Augustus Hin
kins ct al. Murphy & Gardner for pltff,
w & w E Bell for def. Foreclosure
mortgage.