davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1887-08-24

To the Editor OF the Gazette.
In answer to your letter of Inquiry Of
the lG.h, asking my views on the prOhi-
oitiOn question, and whether "it is
wise, is it expedent aud TO the best In
tecests OF the Democratic psrty of Texas,
as now constituted, for either prohibition
or anti-prohibition Democrats to con-
tinue the sgitstiOn of the subject with e
view tc making the opinions ard votes
of the late CANVASS parry test next
year," l would emphaticaIly answer
'fRo." But, SIS the question seems now
to be sgitated principally by that
ciass Of voters calling themselves
not; class VINO nave besn
sts5bipg the Democracy upon every oCca-
sion; who have voted against regular
Democratic nominees, district, state and
national; men wh0 now, although Claim
ing to be simon-puTe Democrats, also
boast Of voting for ST John for President,
and "would do it again rather than sup
port Clevelsnd;" men who 70 ed with
CreG1l's boilers for D0honey for Gov
ernOr, against Governor Ross; those vino
voted for j. c Kearby for Congress, c
Republican Prohi5itionI3t, against the
regular nominee, Hon. Jo Abbott, in the
Sixth district; thOse who Invariably sup
pert almost any candidate in opposition
TO regular Democratic nominees, eud who
during the campaign were loud mouthed
Democratic Prohibitionigts; 1t is this
class thst l would like to see
leave the Democratic ranks alto
gether. as for reading ont
any Democrat for expressing his vie~s
at The boIlot box is concerned, upon this
question, which WAS submitted e the
people for their ratification or rsjectioE
| am not in fsvor, an as it Is COCA Dem
ocratic doctrine "that the msjority should
rule" believe ell true Democrats will
acQuiesce TO the wishes Of The people
which has been expressed By nearly leo,
| 600 MS i5Tity, Those vino will no sccep
the situation without qUibbhng ere no
| Democrats snd the sooner they GligE
themselves with their respective parties,
tie better.
STALL always oppose state prohbi
ton, snd l sincerely hops the next Dem
ocralc convention viii take such steps a
will prevent the re-submissiCn Of TIN
question, leaving it where the people hav,
relegated it by 200 majority, anc
there remain buried forever.
JAMES W. GOLLEDGE.
Editor and Proprietor "Refector."
Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1887-08-24
the part Of the Democratic party TO e
graft an anti plank in It's platform.

, AZ the party SANDS nUI, there is no
s".ls. But IT we arc ler a~ay after
null e Of seeker. w1n Ire sgitat-
in- "a. "re .,,rS CUT o,-.sass, there
wlll be q sp,c and Di- one.
8. Prohibition is j good thing, but
there are great many other good meas
ures for the party TO look after without
being split up OF this one.
+. We regret 20 see our anti friends ts6
ing the stand they 90 in the MATE. T.ey
would DO well TO dssist II their efforts TO
create disCo-d in the Democratic RAJ.
). The pros will only act on tn de
tensive in the matter. IL the fl. is
forced on them in the c0unsy s1d stste
conventions they WI t1lt 5-ayolr for
tAAt which they believe : right.
g. s,us have p2acs, sid IT-"1 TO ~'eet
in the next state convention al Fort Worth
meet Is Democrats and EO5 s. pros -ud
aut!l. x. \. NUsGE5vE.
Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1887-08-24

CLEEURNE, TEX, Aug. 20, los7.
To the Editor of the Gazette.
The question of reading out about three
fiths Of the Democratic party is sheer
foolishness, unless they are willing TO go.
The vital question is whether these three
e.ths OF the party who are Prohi5itionists,
ere going 10 let their leaders, es grand
NEIL as there ore in the party and IN
Tex.s to-day, be read out ana butchered
politically because Of the thunder blowa
fourth by CLARK, Mills, e5 al, and per-
haps prompted by tnaJ c0mmonest OF hu-
man fs;linge, Jealousy. True their cause
was defeated, but it was not by MAORI
ty of Democrats, but by g majority
gained by the fusion OF the Republican,
GgeenhsCk, negro snd German vote CT the
state. TIE two latter factions vote usu.
ally with the Republicans. We do not
believe these prohibition Democrats re-
ferred to will allow such men as Maxey,
CulGeTsOn, HerndOn, Lenhan and others,
10 be butcbered to Accommodate jealous
rivals, aud 90 not think fhey ought 20 do
80. They hHYe nothing to fear, aud no
harm can be done by allowing The question
to remain in st&tu quo. a split in the
party will be cSuSed by the anti5 il they
persist ia the course marked out by Clark,
Mills and the other leaders The msjor-
lily Of the party should rule ea resr as
practicable, as well rs the majority OF
citizens Of q state. Conservative judg-
ment will prevail, however, and there
will b. no reading Olt ieither CT leaders
CT The rank aGd fie CT the party.
H. p SIMoNDs,
Editor Telegram
Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1887-08-24
HOUSTON AGE.
IIOTSTON.TET., A

Houston, TEX, Aug, l9, lS57.
To the Editor Of the Gazette.
Replying to your inquiry and request
Of the l3 inst. submit the following:
There are principles that with the
Democratic party are fundamental, snd
one of these principles is opposition to
sumptuary laws as violative of the
individual rights OF citizens, and sn unjust
and unreasonable interference with their
habits and social customs, and, whstever
it may mean by the dictionary definition
OF the phrase, by sumptuary laws, in po-
liticsl usage, is meant the prohibition of
the ssle of Intoxicating liquors
It is wise, expedient and best, that the
principles Of the party should be declared
in its platform; and the principles Of the
party declared in it's platforms ought 20
be supported by the members Of the party
in campaigns and at the polls.
But the Democratic party is not mar
row, bigoted or proscriptive. It is
broad, liberal and tolerant While the
great body of the party moves proudly
along on its line Of duty and, IN Texas al
lesst, slways overcomes it's adversaries,
it will not drive oat. CT, as popular driyel
has it, "resd out' from lis ranks,
every man who fails, in some one par-
ticular, to ipdorse and support the de-
clara.ioDS CT lis platforms. In the go
lection, however, Of its agents zLd Il
GERS for the execution Of the pu,nc
Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1887-08-24
MEXIA DEMOCRAT.
MI IIA, TIN, Aug. Is, $50.
~ NJ thp Ggyptte

MIxIA, TEN, Aug. Is, ISL.
To the Editor Of the Gazette.
The people Of Texas have decided By
an overwhelming majority that they 40
not want constitutional prohibition. The
question was decided in 1on-partisan
manner and no man, or set of men, who
sincerely desire the perpetuIty IF the
Texas Democratic party will ever ST.
tempt to pledge the Democracy for o.
against prohibition.
II the pros secure control Of the state
convention and adopt prohibition plat
form the ants will bolt the party and
vice versa ii an anti platform is adopted.
II the future success end harmony Ct
the party is desired in this state the Dem
ocracy unjust, as 6 whole, regard the
matter IS settled and leave IL where itn0W
stands-buried beneath majority CT
nearly 100000"
TIE idea taat TIE Democracy OF Texas,
has no other fouLd.tIon or mission in life
except the discussion Of state prohibition
is too utterly too absurd to receive q
serious thought. a. least SO thinks
A. N. KENNEDY, Editor.
Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1887-08-24
CoKsICANA OEsEREEK.

CoKsIC4NA. TIN. Aug L.. .s--.
To the Editor OF the Gazette
Replying TO yours OF l5.h inst, desire
TO state that the iate canvass, IN my opin-
ion, was 8 fair expression OF the pgbHC
viii, Cd the question OF ste s.prohiyit!On.
believe taGs very large majority Of
Pronibtioniatg are Thoroughly satisfied
and wiling 70 accept the Issue 81 tnsl.
While l vas one u the supporters of The
aulg nGmeut, On the ground inst it was
noG-partissl, ! an 70 less 2 lover OF true
Democracy, and TN D0E willing 90 lend
rly energies and influence TO ceme3'iDg
ana increasing is strength in the stats
and IN the UnioG. Ii ne agitation l. kept
up i will tend 20 weaken tle Democracy
and may precipita.s fusion
ticket supported By Republicans,
ProhioitlOnists and other disafeC;ed eIe-
ments which msy finally prove disastrous
to the best interests OF he state end the
greatest good to tie greatest number.
All Democrats should accep. the decision
Of the majority and lend their cid t.
again bind in one common brotherhood 3
united and harmonious Democracy.
G. 2. MILLER.
Editor Observer
Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1887-08-24
j I LEWIS,
Temple Hersl
SAL ANGLO, Ten,

SA& ANGELO, Ten, Aug. Il, 1857.
To the Editor of the Gazette.
In reply to your iuterrogstions: L
any American citizen, be he Damocrat
or not, desires to agItate the prohibition
or any other question, by al means let
him DO so. To attempt TO apply the gag
law, for whatever reason, w0uld be un-
American, hence un-Democratic, end put
prohibition in another and worse form,
for instead Of attempting TO regulate snd
restrict the peoples appetite, taste aud
morals, it would tend 20 rezc to tie
ground the three grest pillars on whIca
the American Union is founded-free-
dom OF the press, speech and thought
As to the expediency OF the matter, and
Us bearing upon the future welfare Of the
Democratic party: TIE Democratic
party is founded on such noble principles
as are characteristic OF patriotism and na-
tional honor, and 70 say that lis perpetu-
stion depends on policy or expedient5, &
an insult to the great guardian Of
the peoples rights. II the party can
not bear the agitation eGd
discussion, wishia Itself, q
tie PROHIBITION SIS ut3-r IL vt.,. q lat-
t!c2s-!2 wAica AneIl.4n L1--.y-- H.
Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1887-08-24
HENDERSON TIMES.

HENDERSON, ] EI, aug. l9, 1887,
To the Edi.or of the Gazette.
| think it wise, eIpedient, and to the
best interests OF the Democratic party Of
Texas to entirely rid itself CT prohibition.
TIL Democratic party owes its perme-
nency and greatness to the tenacity with
which it has chung from the infancy OF
this government to principles rather
than 10 consequences; to ideas
rather than to men; to justice rather
than to deception. 1t has ever been dis
tinguished by the nobility Of it's chsTac-
ter, the genuineness of its convictions,
and to its bold snd uncompromising de-
Tense Of, and attachment to, the inalier-
able rights and liberties Of the whole
people. Prohibition, IS it af-
fects the policy of state or
nstion, is either democratic or undemo-
cratic-it can not be both-and if it be
undemocratic, as l emphaticelly believe
it is, it should be eliminated from the
party. It's puerile to contend that the
Democratic party with its traditions and
its manhood ever evinced in the past, tC
combat the enemies OF good government,
should remain silent on this question
when It meets in convention. We are
told that prohibition, in theory, Is here
to stay until it can be put into practice
end il it be the panaces for nearly sll ths
crime, misery, wee, poverty and suffer
ing incident to mankind; il its sdop
ton would abolish the mani
fold evils OF society; dis
pense with lajls, penitentisries and aims
Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1887-08-24
DENTON MONITOR.

DENTON, TN, Aug. Is Iys-.
To the Editor OF the Gazette.
In regard to prohibition, while our
opinion hiss undergone no chaors Whist
ever as to its wis tom, yet we would not
favor the exclusion OF aav msn from the
psrty on account CT his vote on the An o.
August, be he anti or pro. So far as we
are concerned it WAS not and is rot &
p2rty question, snd should rot De made
party test. We believe the platform
should remain Us il is on the question, il
vieW OF the fsCt that we have local option
in the constitution. We are opposed TO
inserting an anti-pr0hibjtion section in
our next plst!Orm for the reason that
such procedure would be regarded as
81 outrage by hosts Of lifelong Demo-
Gratis, when compared with other qUes-
ti0ns before tAe people, which cover the
entire held OF state and federal politics,
prohibition is simply side issue; but we
YOU'D not be forced to drop it, and do
not propose to be governed
by the dictation of sthose who
proclaim "nO truce for the leaders"
When our lesders go the crank and file"
will go with them. If they deserve pun
ishment, sll are equally guilty, and will
also receive their sentence.
We would ask the editor Of the Fort
Worth GAZETTE 8 question, and hope ne
will answer: Chow many and who of
those VINO promuIgate mo truce for tee
leaders have themselves OF ell times
been urqges.iOled Democrsts7''
c. W. GEERs,
Editor Denton Monitor.
Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1887-08-24
houses, and restore universal peace,
happiness and prosperity, as its lesders

houses, ana restore universal peace,
happiness and prosperity, As it's lesders
zslously claimed it would do, certainly
ira champions will be inconsistent and
untrue if they quench its agitation in.
stead OF stimulating it. They have de-
c!ared thnt the adoption of pro-
hibition would 90 more for the
good OF the people than the
most ardent end patriotic Democrat ever
claimed for Democracy. It is evident
that prohibition will remain in some
shape TO threaten the future tranquility
OF the state. And whatever may be the
conclusion Of men as to the political
complexion oil the late campaign,
it is evident, beyond sny doubt,
that large msiority OF the
Democrats OF Texas sTe opposed TO pro-
hibition; anda majority OF the Demo
Gratis certainly have manifest right to
declare the principles OF their party, par-
ticularly SO, when those principles are
n perfect harmony with the expressed
views Of nearly 81 the leading Dem
oCgats from Jefferson up to the
present tine and the national Democratic
conventions-the highest tribunals OF cur
political organization.
Yes, the Democracy in Texas has other
foundations Tor Its existence and mission,
out il hGs no foundation for
compromising any of its time-honored
principles. It's eye should be constantly
open 10 detect snd expose the secret
springs Of political designs. The Repub.
licsn party IN ito darkest days never
sought to destroy the present form of our
government, or TO overthrow entirely the
present course Of society and
morality, yet the Democratic
party, true TO the instincts OF the fathers,
fought it on every inch OF the ground De
cause its principles tended toward cen
trslization, and not until this helesy,
called prohibition, which is not only IN
democratic but aGti-AmeriCar, is eter-
rally vanquished, should the Democratic
party cease TO fight it.
"A. T. MINER,
Editor Henderson Times.
Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1887-08-24
PILOT POINT N1tM ERA.

PILOT POINT, Ten. Aug N 1857.
To the Ej;,or OF the Gazette.
IL answer to your inquiry Of the 18th
touching the agitation Of he prohibition
question by either Pres or Ants, we
deem it impolitic, unwise and ruT:tul Of
the political unity CT the Democratic
party SIS well IS detrimental 10 our best
social relations and the domestic prosper
ity OF our every common Interest. Let
TIRE question rest in the silent analysis Of
time and reason, and the fnilncss Of the
future Will reveal that which is hest for
al. Z. y. OLIVER.
Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1887-08-24
VICTORIA ADVOCATE.

VICTORIA, Ten, Aug. 20 1857.
Iotas Iil:or OF the Gazette.
replying 10 your favor OF the 18th inst.
PENN NE 70 say do not deem it wise,
Npldien,, CT TO the best interest OF the
E s1e Democracy thst the agitation Of PRO
-.91lon be continued longer il Texas;
1-u . THIS end favor that the next plat
!S'u ol tie party in the state shall de-
',AIe emp1stically its opposition to all
S-sa SumpiusTy measures.
a: the same time em
.sua-y opposed 10 any sys-
@4 Of reading into or out OF the par
! democrats VINO in the recent election
wee lor prohibition, being willing to let
.1eH future political actions show by
s-e!f support Of the Democratic nomi-
ives We. whether they be Democrats 10 good
h.ta Or not.
- tae emphatic rebuka administered al
-; s-s polls by the people to az
NOT. .AyoEs Of tits prohibition ques-
:. .'V1 should, for many long years
come, suppress eli attempt:
- 49,, l.OLestlng the peace hnd welfare CT thu
'@Se with its like.
. IA'.iotiC, honest Democrats who gave
I'm S-e measure their approval, must but sc
~~1o"IeGge the hurttul toolishness OF Ii
n.. agitation in the face of it
Usual defeat es Indicated by tn
,.o,ee;$,"a.e.im'ng msior.ty TO recently givel
sD.;smocracV has higher mission in th
ss ..'S OF cur broad country than to stan
49,. t-e E.osE for ianstical intolerance an
mo .''t,cuen hobbies, and the people hav
,us decidedly put their condemnatio
t5s GI ms move in Texas, il is but RICH
jo, low. verdict be accepted as fnal to Ii
,ms ssS existence as political questio
Us. +. d. LINN.
Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1887-08-24
TEMPLE HERALD.

TEMPLE, I'm, Aug l., 1851.
Tt the Editor OF tho Gazette.
To your irqQisy l would say: The
PrOhib ,ti0nists have never regarded the
amendment Ga involving any parry issue,
and Therefore the election settled every
thing tina. was st isGue PROHIBITION ms9
be brought forward again some time in
the future; IL so it will be again On its
merits as question OF police regulation,
unless the policy indicated by Mr.. Mills
and some others, of taking the twelfth
plank out CT the plsttorm and substitut-
ing an anti plank, is adopted. II this is
done there will be two wings Of Texas
Democrats, Democrats are Democrats,
and w:ll be and should be ia spite OF ali
side issues. When time allows the hea.
OF the canvass to pass sway and passion
to cool down all this troubled fury will
pass away and Democrats will be Demo
Gratis sgsin on the old platform,
j. Z. LEWIS,
Temple Herald.
Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1887-08-24
liberty for which the foretatbers sacri-

iced their lives, their fortunes co.; their
sacred honcr-iS st stake, ten ietl, ~
consigned 20 the silence nF -.i-. 'n.u' hc
the side OF the sc. O p 80 Htpu1r
can parry. The ides OF MAXI = the gu-s-
ton party test is Gn aDsuru one, for
while, like . true American institution,
in the Democratic party the msiority
rules, it Is with the msgrsnim0us proyiso
that it shall be with justice to the minor
ity. Az to whether it will or will not be
best for the party to lesve the matter IS +,
now stands, let this &c sifted At the pr
marIes-the only place st which the trus
expression OF the desires Of the peo9!s
can be obtsiued. The Democratic
party's mission in life is -
graHp!e VITA aud settle all grsst
questions which affect, ia greater or
lesser degree, the welfare OF the 2e PIE,
and among that number is the prohiDi-
ton question. These are not the studied
and guarded opinions Of stsid old
Democratic "Wab boss" out the fee
frank and open expression of young
Democratic colt, from whose neck the
party COlISr has not vel had an oppor-
tunity to wear of the flowing name, nor
leave an ugly scar-which appreciates the
neigh OF approval but csres rot g CONT
mental for the kicks of The whole herd
being satisfied with the selt-consciousnes
of duty well performed.
FELIX PROBANDT,
Editor San Augrlc Enterprise.
Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1887-08-24
an' aettled by the voters Of the state

ani settled by the voters OF the state
OF T'xas in their capacity IS citizens
"o,', md wt'6"p reEard 10 parry. IN
fha' es2so':y ~. =, =, - have settled it =.
fsr - NJ rltiea can settle anythi9 = l.
has ",en settled without detriment to
the Democratic party.
To now introduce the question into
psrty councils and make it q psrty meas
uEe would We think only complicste mat
tsrs and bring discord and confusion
where harmony now exists. We believe
tast /. should sd will be allowed to re-
Min where it now is, and that instead of
being g yrr!tabie Banquo's ghost which
"Rili not down" It will not again appear
as 3 prominent feature in our state pol
Tics TOR many years.
RUDOLPH Bros,
Editors Mercury.
Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1887-08-24
kOsSE CYCLONE.
KO>SE, TEN, Aug ~. ls,-
rs ~. E..,.tt.

iNO@Nt, W ~. 1850
To the Eiitor Of the Gazette
Yours OF inquiry under date Of August
10, is TO hsId. III reply ! have 70 say
Considering The wrought up feeling Of
the citizens OF Texas or me subject, l
would deem it very unWise in the next
Democratic state convention to even at
tempt to insert an anti or pro plank il
the platform. An attempt ct either
would disrupt the psrty. For one l can
say the pros do not desire to sacrifice Z
party they love with any such rashness
However, the tactics OF Clark, Mills, ct
al, to "Droscribe the leaders Of this
ieuaticism" (Which includes such men as
Culberson, Reagan ana WYnneJ if puL IL
effect viii spring third party OF elacm
lag strength, ard very probably place the
Republicans in power.
JAMES 0. JONES.
Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1887-08-24
GONZALES GAZETTE.
GoSztIEs, Tx, aug. J.. lsi7.
Tor of the Gazette.

GpNZ tIE~i x, aug. -, ls',,
To tho Editor of the Gazette.
In reply to your letter OF 18th inst. ask
ing my opinion So to whether or not tde
question of prohibition should be made
IN issue ia the next state Democratic con
ventiOn, or whether the matter should re-
main settled as it now stands, will say it
is ny opinion that the question should
come up sQuarelY before that convention,
and believe it to be thc duty IF the cor
vention 10 declare in plain ana unmis-
teEab.a lsnguage whether prohibition is
Democratic or not. I further think il
the duty of the convention, and one that
hey owe to the party and to every Demo-
cratic voter in the state, thai the issue
should be squsrely met and forever SET
tied as any other political question. l am
not ia favor Of the party lodging sny po-
litiCal issue but believe they should de
clare for or against it. Settle the ques-
ton now and forever is my motto.
d. l. SUTTON,
Proprietor Gonzales Gazette.
Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1887-08-24
Wills POINT cHRoy1cLE.
10 the Editor of the Gazette.

WILLS FuINI. IL. Aug i. ls-I
To the Editor Of the Gazette.
In reply to your inquiries Of the I&.h
inst, have to ssy: IL it were true tnst
the question of prohibition was settled
by the 10000 majority against IT, ard
therefore not likely to come 10 SIS
question il state politics again for very
many yeays, it would not be wise, expe-
dent, Lor 20 the best interests OF tae
Democratic party OF Texas for ther the
prohibition or 5nt- prohibition Democrats
to continue the agitation Fl the subject
for any purpose whatever. aid ia no
event should the agitation Of the
subject be continued with =
view to making the opinions
and votes il the late cs1vass nsIty test
next year. No msn's party feaity should
ne questioned, for his vote ia the late
canvass, for his party failed to Instruct
him on that subject.
The Democratic party CaEno. regard
the matter settled ana leave il wueTe il
now stands, 50 long IS tie prohibition
lists, 81 they ere nov doing Keep 70 the
agitation SAD declare t.eg ere mailing
Tlady i'r another c5Dfct, ACv. w. well
!, .u'gr- n fl- - rtr', - 81 80 e
Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1887-08-24
LrLING sIGNlL.
LrLtNG, Ten, Aug. IL, 1857

LCLtNG, Ten, Aug. IL, 1851.
t. the Editor OF the 6azette
heve your letter asking my opinion
on the prohibition question for publica-
ton. In reply have to say that an
opposed to reading Democrats out Of the
party because tbey voted for prohibition,
but / am in favor q the next convention
Incorporating il its platform , clearly
d=tled plank against prohibition.
j =. BRIDGEs
Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1887-08-24
EDITORIAL OPINIONS.
..al .t,4 Scrond Page.

:, the premises, l fail to STE
,,r'o1 -: - reason for prescribing
81 s s5;5 s :55p'5 : d ~ q
Il cs1vss s1,a course on tie part Of
.iir5 . !: ,rsald BE- far, prudent and jas
i s1is the question hGvi1g been sub
a.'ae, nurely nom partisan issue, it
>.;sa D .rd iBG;sDU,aoly evident that
!: c.s'i - ether for or against
. v'-ls .su.e Democrats, as such,
X ~ no way compromised
gre ~ 70 or forfeited their rights Of
esii lsAi .i, in the Democratic party.
e;15s.:Lo1f5 .ra .6ing out" OF prescribing
2. .l.n IS on account Of their position
9:n C- aa-otioition amendment question,
.; ne ctrnot be valitlg entertained
,eIsl -. 20 ~ the victorious faction
81 eA5.1' JOIN HORNY, SR,
Y 'A"'' Editor Sun.