The weekly Floridian. [volume] (Tallahassee, Fla.) 1867-19??, 1887-07-07

xA. Railway sno N.'s ,.,.s,lss.-
Fi osssn.. " n: B. Rhsds@' Apfe ~
pf 4 49,
;ccounty: IN
Rnr. =; "A ,uSmi. case to a jury for trial
htsn,.. go ;eiued where there ID demurrer
upon tne s.r.,;on.. but no pleathersto, and sneh
70 The cha has been '1jodued in I oy the piailnn
dems,, GOT been waived or aoenuoneo Vy. tue
ed nss u hard OF dispcsed Of BY the court
IadgmeniH e.derso.. Reardon ttacduch, Tor
,.ns LIyd 3 AUSTIN foe sPps''ee %
Admiuistratsr. ct al, Appellants.
9 TTiis.b.ih A. Hendricks, ct ally Appellee
Naval county. i, ,.,.T
R.xEy. y: -..,.,o, c.nno, maintain a sui, for
l. Az '.nder the statutes of this State, though
parl''o., rae Originally idstiiuied BY his intes-
such sS Irs,,i,fnck VS. Willard, IS Fla, 156, ap-
proved husband ia u party complainant
,;obt of his wife. and has no other
slmlp'; The headings and the wife dies. and Der
sisu. Is after wards made complainant,
HOu', husband csnnoi be regarded AS having on
se.nis.diugs the s'aius N complainant as her
ne P,s,sns having been taken 10 revive the
~. nj IS such heir. 81,
su. rhsra a decree has been rendered in the
. W. If pfoper parties, il will be reversed by
s as ,nneilate Court ut It's own molten.
necree reversed.
cee,se Wheaton Deans, for appellants; Ran
az walkers & Foster. for appellees.
,s vsrnum & Co.. Appellants. vs. Jennie
'TToTpsend, .Adininstralrix, Appclee-Duval
County.
R,SEY j.: ~. ,
n rgbl of action for libel dies in this STATE
n ,br plalnlif, and he action cannot be re-
"a in favor 0t his personal representative
~ r,'s,onrzle Street Ry. Co. rs. ChaPpeN, % Fla,
"a rerse,red and approved
Judgment reversed.
p.odall, Walker & Foster, tor appellants; H.
q Bucknan, for appellee
p..s.cols Gas CO.. Appellant, VS.. A. Lo,zes
sans & Co, Appelees-Escambia County.
In constituting a contract all IFS parts should
ors,drred: and the point to he ascertaned
... meaning and understanding of the parties
.boyn hy The language used, applied 10 the
.ubi,ri mailer
) One part If an agreement may be resorted
40 explain the meaning OF the language or eX
,sr,sIons of another larl.
PS Tn l,-s,r, al "A holcl and his lessons and
~ creditors who had mortgage on The hotel
-, and whose claims were past due, and one
=, inferred into an agreement whereby The cred
49,, screeI To iOrbenr The enforcement of their
ans Tor a stated period. The lessons also
80 certain concessions for the period stated,
rnr,il The creditors should within such period,
-. ,,,,j The creditors were also given lien IN
sddIlional personal property in and about the
so,pl The lessee, Hickey, by SAID agreement,
,opyeyed 10 {. all the personal property in and
hon, The hotel and agreed, as did the lessons,
,hs, G. should take entire and exclusive charge
snd management OF the hotel subject only To
me night OF Hickey, las innkeeper, TO manage
.il hotel for the accommodation of transient
.r,es,s and boarders rhe use and benefit entirely
= HE" creditors. II WAS agreed by all that G.
should renter the lessons and creditors at least
,ncr month statement OF the business OF The
bo,el Of which he WAS Ia he clerk and book
Leener ard have exclusive charge on all accounts
,rrininlny To its business, Keeping also per
anal expense account with H.; anu that he
sbonld remit % the creditors with such monthly
statements all moneys over and above the cur
rpnt expenses of the hotel. Upon full payment
iyC within The Period stated, OF the sums due
she creditors he MAS To TT convey 10 Hickey
mi, anon failure 10 pay in full, he to convey
70 The creditors unless the lessons should assume
the Indebtedness when conveyance was to be
made TO the lessons; Held:
Isl. That the creditors" defendants and APP
,@lees) lid no. By such c0ntrdct become liable
tor sny expense of operating the hotel, and thnt
Il was not the purpose Of the parties thereto 10
create any such Liability upon the said creditors.
o. That the meaning OF the expression as TO
managing The hotel for the Use and benefit en-
,rrv OF the" creditors is shown by the subse-
aqenl Clauses Of The agreement. which provide,
il eject, that the net earnings of the hotel should
oe sppied, in So far as necessary, to the payment
ofihar claims.
Judgment affirmed.
&c. Avery. for appellant; Maxwell & Nal
lory, Or appellees.
] C. Greeley, Appellant. VS.. J. o. .BeSsent, On.
A Hull Claimant,) Appellee-Duval county.
RASEY,J.:
l. delivery of chattels made with the intent
upon The part of both the vendor and vepdee that
Zoe aiter shall hold under deed about TO be exc
cuIed and which is followed Immediately by an
execution of such deed. the vendee remaining in
possession and exercising his ownership under
such possession and deed, is good delivery in
law.
2 B., an insolvent debtor. desiring to make an
assignment oil a stock of goods. &C, for the bene-
iiof his creditors applied to H tn act as assignee
- latfa 6<,c poEo no