The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1887-07-04
SUPREME COURT.
Calendar for the July Term.
BEFORE PRESTON, j.

will be required to attend. The follow
ing is the calendar:
HAWAIIAN JURY.
The King VS.. Keaniani, larceny. Attor-
new General for the Crown, w. A. Kinney
for the prisoner.
Kanaloa VS.. Quinn, Ejectment. Thomp-
son and Poepoe for plaintiff, Smith, Thurs
ton & Kinney for defendant.
Estate of Mauae, Probate appeal. Kin
ney & Peterson, A. c. Smith.
Hiiawe VS.. Kalua, ejectment, jury
waived. Neumann and Monsarrat for
plaintiff, Kinney 81 Peterson for defend
ant.
Kimo VS. Kailianu, ejectment. Poepoe
tor plaintiff, Smith, Thurston & Kinney
for defendant.
Paniani VS. Kaikala, Assumpsit. J. NJ.
Monsarrat for plaintiff.
Kamaka VS.. Kipi ejectment. e. Brown
for plaintiff
Anamo VS.. Kaluna, ejectment. w. c..
Achi for plaintiff A. Rosa for defendant.
MIXED JURY.
Alisiu VS. Uilama, damage. Kinney &
Peterson for plaintiff, A. Rosa for defend
ant.
Hebron VS. Kameenui, ejectment, jury
waived c. Brown for plaintiff, A. Rosa
for defendant.
Waahla vs. Enos, assumpsit. W. r.
Castle for plaintiff
Kaaukal VS.. Wight, ejectment. Achi for
plaintiff, Smith, Thurston & Kinney for
defendant.
Parke VS.. Robinson, trover, jury waived.
c. Brown for plaintiff, Smith, Thurston &
Kinney for defendant.
Kahoohuli VS.. Hamauku, ejectment.
Rosa and Peterson for plaintiff, Smith,
Thurston & Kinney for defendant.
Colburn VS.. Parke, replevin. Whiting &
Creighton for plaintiff, Smith, Thurston &
Kinney FOR defendant.
Taylor VS.. Puakalua, mesne profits.
Smith, Thurston & Kinney for plaintiff, c.
Brown for defendant.
Tibbetts VS.. Parke. assumpsit. Smith,
Thurston & Kinney for plaintiff, Jono.
Austin for defendant.
Waterhouse VS.. Nawahine, assumpsit.
Smith. Thurston & Kinney for plaintiff,
Kane for defendant.
Manuhoa VS.. Alzo, ejectment. Achi for
plaintiff.
FOREIGN JURY.
The King VS.. Robinson, selling liquor.
4 ttorney General for the Crown, Paul
Neumann for defendant.
The King VS.. Moore, assault and battery.
Attorney General for the Crown, }. T. Dare
for defendant.
Buchanan VS.. Burgess, ejectment.
Brown for plaintiff, Thompson for de
PENDANT.
Cartwright VS.. Hoffnung, assumpsit.
Castle for plaintiff, Whiting for defendant.
Laine VS.. Crack, assumpsit, jury waived.
Ashford & Ashford for plaintiff.
Spreckels VS.. Macfarlane, assumpsit.
Hatch and Dare for plaintiff, Paul Neu-
mann for defendant.
Chung Hoy VS.. Rosenthal, assumpsit.
Whiting & Creighton for plaintiff, Paul
Neumann for defendant.
Cartwright VS.. Oliver. assumpsit, jury
waived. Brown for plaintiff, Neumann
and Hatch for defendant.
Wong See VS.. All Chew, case. Castle for
plaintiff A c.. Smith for defendant.
st. Clair VS.. Gibson, breach of promise.
Smith, Thurston & Kinney for plaintiff,
Neumann and Hatch for defendant.
Thomas VS.. Hayselden, case. Brown
and Hatch for plaintiff, Neumann, Whit
ing and Creighton for defendant.
Atkinson VS. Cleghorn, replevin. w. r.
Castle for plaintiff, Attorney General for
defendant.
Hall & Son VS.. Cleghorn, replevin.
Smith, Thurston & Kinney for plaintiffs,
Attorney General for defendant.
4
for plaintiff.
Creighton VS.. Whitman. assumpslt.
Whiting for plaintiff, Smith, Thurston &
Kinney for defendant.
Widemann VS.. Ahin, assumpsit.
Lopez VS.. Bandelra, assumpsit. Austin
for plaintiff.
BANCo CASES.
Michiels, appellant, vs. Hartford Insur-
ance Company. Exceptions from April
term. Neumann, Whiting and Creighton
for appellant, Dare, Dole and Hatch for
respondent.
Chapman VS.. Hawaiian Government, APP
pellant. Exceptions from April term.
Dole and Thurston for respondent, Attor-
ney General, Whiting and Peterson for ap-
pellant.
Kalaeokekoi, appellant, vs. Kahele. Ex-
ceptions from April term. Thompson for
Brown for respondent.
Alderman VS.. Congdon, appellant. APP
peal on demurrer. Dole for respondent,
Ashford & Ashford for appellant.
Parke VS.. See Hop Co., appellant. APP
peal from April term. Whiting & Creieh-
ton for respondent, Ashford & Ashford for
appellant.
Brown VS.. Dias & Santos, appellants.
Appeal from Police Court, Honolulu. |
Achi for appellant.
Matson VS.. Aiona, appellant. Exceptions I
from May term, Hilo. D. H. Hitchcock |
and Kinney for respondent, Ashford & |
Ashford for appellant.
Kane VS.. Hilo Sugar Company, appel !
ant. Exceptions from May term, HiIo.
smith, Thurston & Kinney for respondent, |
D. H. Hitchcock and Creighton for appel
ant.
Wenner Co., appellants, VS.. Lindsay.
Appeal from Intermediary Court. Smith,
rhurston & Kinney for appellants, Ash
lord Il Ashford for respondent
DIVORCES.
Wahlnenui (w) VS.. Haiola (k). L. A.