Salt Lake evening Democrat. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1885-1887, 1887-05-17
THE APPoRTIoNMENr.
The Re.Districting of the TER
tory Under the New IaW.

The Re.Districting of the Terri.
tory Under the New Law.
The Board OF Apportionment provided
by the new Edmunds law met last even
ing at the Utah Commission rooms, and
completed their work of re-districting the
Territory. The Board, which consists of
Governor West, Secretary Hall and all
the members of the Utah Commission,
have held several sessions within the
past few weeks, and the following report
is the result of careful work:
REPRESENTATIVES, DISTRICTS.
No. 1.-Al of Rich county, and Logan.
Hyde Park, Smithfield and Providence dis
tricts.
No. 2.-Balance of Cache county.
No. 3.-Box Elder county.
No. Ogden precinct, Weber county.
No. 5.-Balance of Weber county.
No. 6-Morgan county, Davis county, and
Pleasant Green, Hunter and North Point
precincts in Salt Lake county, and Henne-
feryllle precinct, Summit county.
No. 7.-Summit county Except Hennefer-
vile, Peoa, Woodland and Kamas), and
Mountain Dell and Sugar House ward in
Salt Lake county.
No. e.-All of Tooele county, Tintic pre-
cinct, Juab county and Bingham precinct,
Salt Lake county.
No. 9-First Salt Lake City precinct.
No. 10.-Second Salt Lake City precinct
No. 1.-Third and Fourth Salt Lake CITY
precincts, and Brighton and Granger pre-
oincts in Salt Lake county.
No. l2:-Fifth Salt Lake City precinct, in
GLIDING Fort Douglas.
No. 13.-North Jordan, West Jordan,
South Jordan, Fort Herman, Riyerton,
Bluf Dale, South Cottonwook, Union and
Sandy precincts, in Salt Lake county.
No. 14.-Farmers, Mill Greek, East Mill
Creek, Big Cottonwood, Little Cottonwood,
Butler, Granite, Draper and Silver precincts,
in Salt Lake county.
No. l5.-Lehi, Cedar Fort, Alpine, Goshen,
Santaquin, Spring Lake, Payson and Span
ish Fork precincts, in Utah county.
No. 16.-American Fork, Pleasant Grove,
Provo Bench and Provo precincts, in Utah
county.
No. 17-Springyille, Thistle, Pleasant
Valley Junction, BENJAMIN and Salem pre-
cincts in Utah county; all of Emery county,
and Winter Quarters precinct, in Sanpete
county.
No. 18.-All of Uintah and Wasatch coun-
ties, and Kamas, Woodlawn and Peoa pre-
cincts, in Summit county.
No. l9.-Nephi, Mono, Levan and Juab
precincts, of Juab county, and all of Mil
lare county.
No. 20.-Thistle Fairview, Mount Pleas
ant, Spring City, Moroni, Fountain Green
and Ephraim precinct, in Sanpote county.
No. Chichester, Wales, Manti. Petty,
Mayfeld, Gunnison, Fayette and Freedom
precincts, in Sanpete county, and all of
Sewer County.
No. 22.-All of Beaver and Piute counties.
No. 23.-All of Iron and Garfield counties.
New Harmony precinct of Washington
county and Bluff Bity and st. Elmo pre-
cinctS, in San Juan county.
No. M-All of Kane and the balance of
Washington county.
COUNCIL PRECINCTS.
No. List and 9th Representative Dis
tricts.
No. 2.-2nd and 9rd Representative Dis
tricts.
No. 3.-4th and 9TH Representative Dis
tricts.
No. 4.-7th and 9th Representative Dis
tricts.
No. 5.-lOth and 18th Representative Dis
tricts.
No. 6.-1lth and 14th Representative Dis
tricts.
No. 18th and 18th Representative Dis
tricts.
No. s.-15th and 10th Representative Dis
tricts.
No. 9.-17th and 18th Representative Dis
tricts.
No. 1O.-19th and 10th Representative Dis
tricts.
No. u.-2lst and 22nd Representative Dis
tricts.
No. 12.-23rd and oath Representative Dis
tricts.
There is no doubt that two or three
of the representative districts of this city,
the one of Ogden City, the one including
Park City, that of Tintic, the one of Bing-
ham and probably two or three others
could be carried by the Liberal party at
the next Territorial election provided a
strong effort is made, and it is equally
sure that fair number of the council dis
tricts could also be carried. In at least
two of the precincts of this city the Gen
tile registration has been heavier than
the Mormon, and as the same is undoubt-
eddy the case in the other districts men
toned above, there is no reason why the
Liberals should not make strong pull.