The intelligencer. [volume] (Lexington, Mo.) 1887-1891, 1887-11-26
CIRCUIT COURT DOCKET.
December Term.

Isr pAY-pECEMBEE 5Tn, 1887.
l.. Robt. Z. Greer VS.. George Yuungs. &C
? 10. a. Wilson, administrator, VS. Grove
Young. az, cunt. MT,
man, ct II, to assess damages
4 Inter state Il. i iy Co. VS.. NJ. Il. May
81 al, 10 assess damages
> VIM. K. Smith vs.. Brett Brothers. appel-
iantS, appeal.
6. JiGs Nave VS. Johanna Ne son, appel
liant, appeal.
ID pAY-DECEMBER 9Th, lSs..
: 10. A. Wilson, administrator vs.. Thos
J. Ho. k, vendors lien: bill of exceptions to
5 John Z Burden, administrator, VS.. Chas.
: Mitchell, three notes, answer hlea. .
9. Henry S~togGemIiler Va. Henry Stihens,
cjcctment: continued 10y defendant at his cost.
10 State use BascoIn, assignee etc., vs.. VIM
X. Jackson. ct al. damages
IL. The Gregory Grocer Co, appellant, VS..
II. B. W. Burton VS.. Jos. l.. Hutchinson.
appeal. ~
mote.
80 DAY-DECEMBER Urn, 1887.
II. Nj. Il. Glasgow. appellant. vs.. Robt.
Graham. appeal; jury failed 10 agree.
10. American Bank vs.. Thomas H. Campbell.
equity. leave to reply thirty DAYS after term.
l6. Jerry Proctor Va. Albert LOOMS. ac-
count; jury failed to agree.
II. James c. McGrew vs.. Mo. Z. KY. Co..
is Benz. Elliott, admr.. appellant. vs.. &.
G.. Keith, appeal.
Elliott, admr., vs.. G. G. Keith, VS.. Ben.
Elliott, admr; appellant, appeal; lnterpieI.
20. Home Insurance Co., appellant. vs.. Ben
Elliott. admr., appeal. |
81. RObt. L. Russell. curator ETC., VS.. Geo.
Il. Keith, note.
4rH uAY-DECEMBER sTH. 1887.
D. Clarence Graves ct al vs.. Amos Anson,
% James d. Ish VS.. Mary Haniey ct al,
partitions; answer and motion tor costs
"a, He. Wallace ct al. VS.. Docia "A. Young
Is. Henry {. Human vs.. Geo II. Moore ct
Is d.. c. Francisco. appellant, vs.. John E.
q. joseph A. whitsett. appellant. VS.. Wal
ter G.. donaldson, appeal. ~
%. JAMES b. NJ. Ferran vs.. Geo. F.
Maitland Ell al, VIC notes
5Tu pAY-DECEMBER 9TH, 1887.
80. State use John Huxel VS.. Thomas f.
| Chinn. j. p, writ of prohibition, leave TO file
answer. ~
81 Ollie A.. Peacock ct al VS.. James W.
FitzGerel eJ al. partition for report.
81. Annie Major ct al VS.. Lawson Smith ct
al, partition.
So Herman Echflmeyer VS.. Emile Echel-
meyer, divorce; answer and cross bill hled.
81. State use Bascom, assignee. VS.. Jos. w.
Bowman ct al. on bond.
81. Railey & Burney VS.. H.. c. Francisco.
legal services. answer and reply filed.
81 E A. Phetzing ct al VS.: Mehitabei WIKI
ersOn, eiectment; answer filed.
81. Ben Elliott. admr., Va. james H.. Bum
garner, three notes. =,
80 Thomas F. iiliams VS.. w. G.. Phillips,
note; thirty DAYS to file answer.
80 Max Kemp VS. Phoenix Insurance Co.,
damages; answer filed.
40. Robt. T. Russell VS.. Ben Elliott, admir-
money paid as security; answer flied,
A.. Henry Hainkel VS.. Jacob klee' damages;
AZ. James c. McGrew VS. Mo. p. Ry, Co.,
trover and conversion; answer filed: =
43 Ben. Elliott, admir-, Va. A l.. MaNweii
Al. Mccormick H. NJ. Co. VS.. Chas. d.
SechrIst ct al. note
4h. VIM. II. NIpper VS.. .. A. Jones, re-
veised and remanded.
7Tu pAY-DECEMBER 12IH, 1887.
d. Kate Dixon VS.. T.. q A. r. IL. Co, dam
ages; answer and reply filed.
4G. Auna Ashcrait vs.. Otna AShcrait,
divorce; default and costs.
AZ. John L. Schultz ct al VS.. Joseph hohne-
berger. equity; answer filed and motion Tor
As. State use Maggie d. NJ. Hill etc. VS..
Ben elliot, admir-, bond; demurrer to petition
40. State use Thos. NJ. Hill etc. VS.. Ben.
Elliott. admir-, bond; demurrer to petition
50. Henry wirtmeyer VS.. James II. Bnrris.
81. Farmers Bank of Odessa VS.. r. a. ii.
sru pAY-pEcEMBER 18TH, 1887.
81. John Luhrecht Va Henry GelZer, note
and account; answer and reply filed.
81 Henry Stenins VS.. Elizabeth Stenins,
divorce; answer and CROSS OH anu reply
filed.
"a. Mp. Ey. Co VS.. IL c. Francisco, oh
jec'ions 10 report fled
objections to report flied.
5s. Mop Ry. Co VS.. Levi W. Wernwag,
objections 20 report filed.
81. james Peddicord, assignee ETC., vs.
IS. James F. Catron VS.. Henry Nuelie ct al,
~ 9TH pAY-pgCEMBER IirH, 1887.
SO. John Calron VS.. Lewis L. Green let al,
GO. Ben. Elliott, admir-. vs.. Chatham b.
GI. American Bank VS.. W. II. Littlejohn ct
al, note. ..,
Is. Sarah Z. Self VS.. Henry &. Self, d.
vUrce.
81. Sarah 4. Egan ct al VS.. James A. Camp
bel ct al, partition; alias writ issued.
is. Elizabeth NJ. Franks vs.. VIM. M. Franks,
IOru pAY-pKCEMEER 18TH, 1887.
, &c. Rachel Marshall vs.. james Marshall, di'
, vorce.
81. State use Lexington Saving Bank VS.
City OF Lexin gton, mandainus.
6S. State use J. G.. Fall VS. City OF Lexing
. ton, mandamus; peremptory writ ordered.
e SO. State use Geo. Farrar IS. City of LeNing
=. ton, m~andamus; peremptory writ ordered
20. Stale use Chiles, admir-, VS.. CITY oil Lex
ington, mandamus; peremptory writ ordered.
Il. State use Kriehn & Meyer VS.. City o
Lexington, mandamus; peremptory writ or
dered. -.
= - ohE' FSS oooN -"
OF Lexington, mandamus; perempt0ry VII
ordered
y 10. State use Fitzgerald Ell al vs.. City of Lex
, in-ton, mandamus; ~peremptoryw writ ordered.
"A Isaac Neale assignee OF VIM. Lowry, as
III continued for settlement.
Is John f.. BascOm assignee oil Z. "
Grau, assignment.
rs. Tho. GOsewisch, executor, VS.. City o
/. Lexington. motion to retax costs.
- II. Kriehn & Meyer vs.. City of Lexington
: motion to retaX costs.
rs John T.. Fall VS.. City of Lexington
motion To rctaX costs.
lie 10. Eliza Fitzgerald ct al VS. City of Lexinf
4 ton, motion to retax costs.
50. w II. Chiles, admir-, VS.. City of Les
IS ingtOn. motion 10 retaN costs.
l.. 81. Geo tarrnr VS.. CITY Of Lexington
motion to retaX costs.
s.. So. Lexington Savings Bank vs.. CITY OF Lei
n. IngJon. motion to retaN costs
- 81 R. A. Hicklin VS.. City Of Lexington
L; motion to retaX costs
l.. ST g. Y. Ford vs.. Daniel FlGurnoy, ga
of NJ NJ Robinson. garnishment ON ex. cutIoi
Sax. W. IL. Leonard vs.. r. L.. Il w. !