The Austin weekly statesman. (Austin, Tex.) 1883-1898, 1887-08-04
THROUGHOUT THE STATE.

for prohibition, l5O.
Perry-The vote here to-day was as fol-
lows: For prohibition, 30; against prohi-
bition, 148.
Jacksonvile-Th vote here to-day was
as follows: For prohibition, 403; against,
337.
Hubbard City-The vote here today was
as follows: For prohibition, "a; against
prohibition, 272.
Aubrey-This box went 10 majority for
anti, against IS majority for prohibition
last year.
Gordon-For prohibition, 1913; against
prohibition, 80.
Pilot Point-The vote here to-day was:
For prohibition, 1856; against prohibition,
372.
Atlanta-For prohibition, 457; against
prohibition, PAT.
Cisco-For prohibition, 1873; against,
1O9.
Graham-For state prohibition, 147;
against, 1876.
Arlington-The vote here to-day was:
For prohibition, POL; against, 153.
Eddy-The prohibition vote at Eddy is
SO; against, 55.
Sweetwater - For prohibition, 80;
against, 38.
Stephensville "A Dublin, Alexander
and Stephensville, 349 for prohibition;
against, 724.
Big Springs-The total vote for How
ard county is as follows: For prohibition,
SO; for amendment to article B, 165; for
amendment to article 7, 1866; for amend
ment to article 8, 1855; for amendment to
article 6, 1855; for amendment to article 5,
100. Against prohibition, 112; against
amendment to article 3, -; against article
7, 8; against amendment to article 8, 8;
against amendment to article 6, g.; against
amendment to article 5, IA.
Hillsboro-For prohibition, SOL; against,
461.
Ranger-For prohibition, 32; against,
Albany-For prohibition, 116; against,
Abbott-For prohibition, II; against,
Kosse-For prohibition, 232; against,
1877.
West-For prohibition, 109; against,
23O.
Black Jack-For prohibition, 237;
against, 222.
buTl6SOu-lObdl NoJO pOiAOu lol
prohibition, 148; against, 1S9.
Marshall-For prohibition, 800; against,
SO.
Rockdale--For prohibition, II; against,
200.
Iredell-For prohibition, 142; against,
166.
Dallas-Anti majority for Dallas, East
Dallas and Oaklawn is 1,549. The ma
jority in The county will reach 1000.
Hico-For prohibition So; against,
157.
Rusk-For prohibition, 314; against,
4O3.
Bartlet-For prohibition, 4S; against,
80.
Bullard-For prohibition, 81; against,
ia.
Collinsville-For prohibition, 141;
against, 109.
Troy-For prohibition, 81; against, 1853.
Granger-For prohibition, 134 against,
81.
Paris-Paris gives majority of 81 for
prohibition.
Bells-North Bells, for prohibition, 1856;
against, 80. South Bells, for prohibition,
105; against, 81.
Sherman-For prohibition, 1,O43;
against, 933.
Bartlett-For prohibition, So; against,
SO.
Troupe-For prohibition, 1O7; against,
Ill.
Kyle-For prohibition, 16O; against,
PIG.
Longview-Fifteen prohibition major
ity; county, 125 to $50 anti majority.
Walnut SprIngs-The vote for prohibi-
tion, 80; against, 182.
Dangerfeld For prohibition, POS;
against, 166.
Montague - For prohibition, 213;
against, 223.
New Boston Five voting places in
Bowie county give prohibition 500 ma
jority.
Jeffersop-For prohibition, 224; against
prohibition, $50.
Whitesboro - For prohibition, 80;
against 2O9.
DeKalb-For prohibition, 40; against,
248.
Gainesville - For. prohibition, 864;
against, 7O1.
Bonham-For prohibition, 941; against,
591.
Blossom Prairie-For prohibition, 381 /;
against, 144.
Weatherford - For prohibition, 624
against, 455.
Navasota-Three precincts of this coun-
ty give as follows on prohibition amend
ment: Anderson, anti, 644; prohibition,
724; Navasota, anti, 667; prohibition, 297;
Courtney, anti, 191; prohibition, 552. The
county will give 1,200 majority.
Lewisville-For prohibition, 1873; against
prohibition, 22O.
Van Alstyne For prohibition, 22O;
against, 10.
Itasca-For prohibition, $50; against,
$50.
Belton-For prohibition, SIC; against,
635.
Lorena-For prohibition, 80; against,
50.
Massey-For prohibition, rs; against,
62.
Calvert-For prohibition, 244; against,
1,O68.
Greenville--For prohibition, 459; against,
791.
Marfa-0ne for and 153 against prohi
bition.