New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1887-05-28
UNITED ST4TES SUPREME C0UR7.
NO DECISION IN THE TELEPHONE CASES
A EEHEARING DENIED IL THE MATTER OF THE
MAXWLIL LAND GRANT.

dl9ippOicf dGfsOu IN those We lt.
The Court after announcing its decisions adjourned for tho
term.
Judgments briefly annoguceh about forty tho
| most important Of which follows:
No 2e3-Tha Philadelphia aad Southern Mall Steamship
Company Common yslE PeInsy lvaaia IN
supreme Court o. % The question in this
ease whether the state eonsttuiionay Impose
steamship company IN oorstei under tina lava
the receipts Of suc company. derived nom the trans
portaton OF and by between different
and TO and from foreign This court deccs
that tie state impose such for that it
would be regulation OF interstate This decision ap-
plies equal domestic aud foreign corporatQnS The lEis
nent OF tie supreme court Of Pennsylvania Is reversed
Nos. $50 ard 2G0-DeHamm nunke asa.Hst tho United
States ard the United Tunkc Appeals from
the Court OF Claims The this relates to
the pay OF MAJOR n. p uEkle. retired Army oicer who
was tried by martial June % 1879, found guilty end
dismissed from the Tor violation OF tho act of Congress
OF March lS63 AL for oonct unbscDming officer aud
gentleman but aitarwari BY order OF President
HAYES dated August 1871 restored the service The
Claims found conclusions %. Law tho f1cs Of
emitted longevity pay.
the United entitled under their
ter claim TO recover the received BY the claimant "a re-
tired major which August 1871 amounting
to sl4qO From the iugmentn accordance with tIess
illusions both parties appealed This court hollis that IL does
not positively ami distinctly appear that the proceedings
Of the court martial have in TACT been approved
hrue by the President the United Stae the articles OF
before tho could be carried
tion and that consequently Major hunke mover legally
cashee dismissed from the Army ami Is entred to his
longevity pay well that which he has already received
fO regular pay both before tho order OF Secretary Bcnap
revoked and aerward- Tho judgment of the Court Of
reversed and tie rvmanded for further pro-
| cee iings in conformity with this opinion.
No 2G7-The Western Union Tee lrAph Company against
William Pendleton In the 5uprcme Court Of In
diana suit brought By the sender Of telegram
from shelbyvle. Ind to Oamwa Iowa to apenal
ty 900 under statute Of Indiana prescribing the
in which kilograms shall be and delivered The
planant alleged his telegram hal been pat
Tn ffa af-OrfQ a
| ton Instead OF being delivered and that
| this IN violation Of tho Indiana statute. Ihe
telegraph company maintained that tie could
additionally regulate The method OF delivery Of telegram in
another state because such would regulation VI
Interstate THIS court holds that tho attempted
by Indiana Of the mode IN Which sent
bT Telegraph companies dong business within her limits
delivered TN other states cannot te upheld Tbs
III gment Supreme OF Indiana reversed and
the Temanded for further proceedings
| The other decisions to-day follows:
No ge5-Ilobert Irvne AMI Others appellants sgt tho
c"urt OF he nsd Itss Tor the Estan DIric Of Tevas
Decree arne with coats and without interest to the ibe
No 9s0~ChATiss BonziEor Others. plaintiff error
agt Wiasn H. hobertson collector ETC In error 70 we
| OF New YORK. Judgment affirmed with costs.
Ressenisr steel Company oel Petition for rsheArnS
No ;77Msnr.cG Ganay. appellant ast l. Marble a.
o 81 te psres Of coanp1 pecres aiTmsi viii
No gs!-AIoImder d. Shepherd, plaintiff error agt
John w THOMPSON In error 20 te supreme Souit OF the
|
enended with directions 10 set aso the verdict and
No RoIsns simonton, ezccutrx. ETC. appellant aet
iIir.m Sls,y st a. ASpe, ron gis S.5s TS9r o ta
Decree alTlaei win costs.
pc"tn w ~ Srt coat Of ne t-iG t,e. Tor Inc
&c. ~ ~, 70 ~ S -, 49,, ,tft 49,.
cause roasndod with directions 20 awari pereaptoJ
zSSJsnes n siberr eollsctor &c, plaintiff in
&c In error Ne SIeai Court o. the STATE, oI ne
No 2gI-Ihc MinncAuOas Gas -ht Company. appellant
sgt To KerrAnrray Manufacturing CemPany Apgesi
Minnesota. Decree affirmed with costs 4nd interest.
Louise BeSnsy Appeal rdn me circuit toslt Of lie tnts
9sssed With costs saG cause reminded directions
such further proceedings therein equity and justice may
Ne 97s-Thona- strnther., plaipua error Joseph
for the western District 81 PennsyivHN Judgment Affirmed
No 2J5Jo,cph shipPen plaintiff IN error ag ThoEas n
isT the District q COLORADO JudTsn, coat,
az 'spee f 'Ts 1 Tg @ r, 70 as" toapv
pLAntig IN rref se James srT In 'rior 10 The supreme
| win costs and Interest
8 Ncore In error u To r1u CoGri
i s SSr n nes and 70 be- en.sTed naas ra
'. No si 'o H. oocs' al aSr ec 5na in eror ast
tn nashville Railroad Couaagy Ia error 10
| OF Tennessee. Judgment affirmed with costs -
u;le1 asslgnos etc Xppoael nom liz Crcut Coar,
intel sLt , 90. ,s i cs for sue iar pro
cengs consistent VIA The opin!on Of ms court ~
ian, Brown et al In error - tho supreme
S' Se q 99 Hlsa5I " raSoa Il a. pa IN error as
Charles Gr-vo 81 A. IN error 20 ne ,cl Coir Of me
pnilei stats iot INC has.e'h D''''' oi Ien7y'''h
No. Ss5@I s. Este, Of al appellants AT. $ H. GautoF
Appealed from ,ho district Court the uuiei state.
i% s ne cost aaG e5us@ rsadd Tor utfrr proceeding
10 $50 The Argeugns Nnlas cemp1ag plan az n erro
Court II the United sites tho District OF Colorado
%6 S7sTas tai'Si states. appellant no MAJ
well Laud Grant COTpiuy lppr-. ron W n's'' . -,
lion a o tls Maxwell anl grant ase rcecntJ
N' S y Dor 4 eesa e a paiaa, a Catherine
st.tes ior TIE Eastern District Of Missouri Judgment
No 2a u, Tivcers Insuuo. COMPANY plaintiff in
error agt Catherine L. Eiwars IN error 10 n circuit
YorS judgment affirmed viia costs aad Interest.
SO 2ll-7larr GIN D. I.i.u = stIo' agt 'is t'
sour Pacihe hniway ,9mp1a ~, IN 6 Sis2s 20 Trta
tier proc, 20 DO had theron ac,orl4n. " law a.,
Court o. state o. Kenucky Dismissed io the want U. i"ff
37o-oeors, \ Mormon Ct al aprsa,a; 1sa ans.
st1Iss District OF California Decree Affirmed with
NO ~ The ST. Lou Iron Mountain ani s9uthsrn Ran
S S4g % nh rr % no alc, for - East
District OF ARKANSAS Jogmeat Affirmed Win costs Al"
So sca-rmma C. whst sole DIV &C. appellant
hon The Ccu OF he Unite, stAses Tor tho District
No 1.-THE Teas rrlnsportiOa Company o. a. appel-
cut com Of lie Jn.is sa'es or lie Eastern District OF
! Texas. Decree affirmed " IA costa
| No. 971-fho Bur..n Gun. Cellar Rapi1c and SortAcIn
! Yalway omplny. plaintiff ChAIloa T. Dunu
etc In orOr snprmo Court Of tho state u Mime
with costs ami ciuse re1In e or
further proceedings b. hal therein IN conformity win The
OF. niOn Of this court
No 81 Tho Thorn Wire hedge Company, and Others
plan crrer Cassls D. buler aud others ia eI
l., ~ the Unie satrs IOr TIE Dlatgct
, | OF Minnesota. Judgment affirmed with costs
3OJ-rho Central RIllToit ana Banking company OF
Georgia plaintiff agi. James G. Nc ma ~ error
O. the Circuit Court OF the United states for e Mddio DIS
uiet Of Alabama. Judgment affirmed Win cost. ,,,.,
No 13S7Thomas r. Bayard, Secretary OF state panuu
In the nted States rel s. Y. WHO Motion
advance granted AMI asscns argument on the
e after already assigned iVr
that dAY
. I No 1.-THE Merchants' Mutual Insurance Company
pellant agt George %. Allen.
I No. 7E-Ibe Merchants Mutual Insurance Company, ap
pellant Silas Weeks Petition fOr hearing denied
No 2l6Edward Warren. ct al sppellSnfa, AT FRANK =
q etc den!cL
| No n Chnleu apnallaIf MaYhaN q