St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1887-05-20

The Board of Public Works have had
under consideration the resolution or
order of the Common Council, approved
March II, 1887, relative to the widening
OF Cliff street, between Forbes street |
and the intersection line between lots |
IL and IL, block 3, Bernheimer's addi-
tion, with Forbes street, and having i'll |
Vestlgated the proposed Improvement; |
respectful report THAT said improve
ment is necessary and proper between |
forbes street and GO0dhue street; that |
the estimated expense thereof is $1,000; |
that real estate to be assessed there |
for can be found benefited to the extent |
OF the damages, costs and expenses |
necessary to be incurred thereby; that |
said improvement is not asked for by a |
petition of majority of the owners OF
property to be assessed therefor, but we
herewith send plan or profile OF SAID
Improvement, and an order for your
adoption, if you desire us to make the
Improvement. Yeas 4, nays0.
The Engineer having submitted plan
of land to be taken, the following report
was ordered sent to the Council, tO-wit:
TO the Common Council of the City of
st. Paul:
The Board of Public Works have had
under consideration the resolution or
order of the Common Council, approved
April p, 1887, relative to the opening,
widening and extension of Edgert0n
street, from Maryland street to north
city limits, and having investigated
the proposed improvement, respectfully
report that said Improvement is neces-
sary and proper from Brainard avenue
to the north city limits; that the esti-
mated expense thereof is ST, 600; that real
estate to be assessed therefor can be
| found benefited of the extent OF the dam
ages, costs and expenses necessary to
be incurred thereby; that said improve
ment is not asked for by petition of
ma 0rity of the owners of property to be
assessed therefor, but we herewith send
a plan or profile of said improvements,
and an order for your adoption, if you
| desire us to make the Improvement.
| Yeas 4, nays o.
The Engineer having submitted plan
of land to be taken, the following report
was ordered sent to the Council, to-wit:
TO the Common Council of the City OF
st. Paul:
The Board of Public Works have had
| under consideration the resolution or
order of the Common Council, approved
April 81, 1887, relative to the opening,
widening and extension of De Soto
street, from Rose street to Brainard
avenue, and having investigated the
proposed improvement, respectfully re-
port that said Improvement is necessary
and proper from Rose street to Maryland
street; that the estimated expense there
of is $500; that real estate to be assessed
therefor can be found benefited to the
extent of the damages, costs and eX-
penSeS necessary to be incurred there
by; that said improvement is not asked
for by petition of a majority of the
owners of property to be assessed there
for, but we herewith send a plan or
profile of said Improvement and an
order for your adoption. if you desire us
to make the Improvement. Yeas 4,
nayS0.
The Engineer having submitted plan
and estimate of cost, the following re-
port was ordered sent to the Council, to-
wit: No.
TO the Common Council Of the City of
st. Paul:
The Board of Public Works have had
consideration the resolution or order of
the Common Council, approved April
81, 1887, relative to paving College
avenue, from Cedar street to West
Third street with cedar blocks and
granite curbing, and having investi-
gated the proposed improvement re-
spectfully report that said Improvement
is necessary and proper, including i'll
the contract for said paving the neces-
Sary sewer, water and gas connections
to the property lines: that the estimated
expense thereof is s19.923, one-half OF
which need not be paid into the City
Treasury before the contract is let:
that real estate to be assessed therefor
can be found benefited to the extent OF
the costs and expenses necessary TO be
= incurred thereby: that said improve
ment is not asked for by petition OF a
majority of the owners OF property to be
assessed therefor, but we herewith send
a plan or profile of said improvement
and an order for your adoption, ii you
desire us to4makaG the. s-imprQYement
Yeas 4, nays 0.--s-zs-ossse.a.-y,..,e.,,
The Engineer having submitted plan
and estimate of the cost, the following
report was Ordred sent to the Council
tO-wit:
TO the Common Council of the City OF
st. Paul:
The Board of Public Works have had
under consideration the resolution OF
order of the Common Council, approved
April 81. 1887, relative to the paving OF
alley in block five (5), st Paul proper
with cedar blocks from Cedar street tC
Minnesota street, and, having inveS
tigated the proposed Improvement, re-
spectfully report that said improvement
is necessary and proper: that the eSti
mated expense thereof is $4,000, one
| half of which need not be paid into the
CITY Treasury before the contract is let
that real estate to be assessed therefor
can be found benefited to the extent OF
} the costs and expenses necessary to be
, incurred thereby; that said improve
, ment is not asked for by petition OF
, majority of the owners OF property to Dt
assessed therefor, but we herewith sen(
plan or profile of said improvement
, and an order for your adoption, if yOr
desire us to make the Improvement
, Yeas 4, nays O..
The Engineer having submitted plaI
and estimate of cost, the following re
port was ordered sent to the Council
, tO-wit:
| To the Common Council of the City o
st. Paul: 'o'.'tt
5 The Board of Public Works have hat
: nnder consideration the resolution o
order of the Common Council. approved
April 81, 1887. relative to the grading
3 of Frances street, from Arcade street t.
2 Hope street, and having investigated tin
=: proposed improvement, respectfully re
D port that said Improvement is neces
' sary and proper; that the estimates
0 expense thereof is S1,654.50. one-half o
. which need not be- be paid ahd Int Int
t tract is let; that real estat
e to be assessed therefor can be foun
1 benefited to the extent of tn
! costs and expenses necessary to be in
, Cured thereby: that said improvement
e is not asked for by a petition of ms
I iority of the owners of property to b
t assessed therefor, but we herewith sen
= a plan or profile of said Improvement
n and an order for your adoption, if yo
It desire us to make the improvement
J, Yeas 4, nays 0.
. The Engineer having submitted pla