Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1887-05-07
SUPREME COURT.
IN BANK.


FRIDAY, May G, 1857.
Court mel pursuant to adjournment Present.
| Searls, Chief Justice presiding; McHinstry, J.;
Thornton, j.; sharpstein. j.: Temple, j.; McFar-
Bailiif
115l7-kearney VS.. Kearney-Argument re-
s'imed by Carter for respondent, Elliott for ap
,2oS-P. A. Miller VS.. Dunn, Controller
Argued by a. L. Hart for respondent and sub
mitted
International Bank of D. O Mills vs. Porter
Bros.-Argued by Hart for appellants, Freeman
for respondents and submitted
12.l36-Baker VS.. Fireman's Fund Insurance
Companion motion of Belcher, cause ordered
placed on bank calendar. Further ordered that
appellant be allowed 20 days to file brief re-
spondent 20 days to reply, cause to be there
upon submitted.
II ,524-Chandler VS.. Peoples Savings Bank
Argued by Hart for appellant, McKenna for re-
spondent and submitted
12,0T-Hitehcock vs.. Superior Court-On mo-
ton OF w. ii. IL Hart it is ordered that the
time to show cause herein be and is hereby ex-
tended to and including Tuesday May II 1887.
II l69-Green ct al vs. State of California.
nia-Both cases argued by Hart, Freeman and
Hurd for appellants, and submitted.
AN ORDER
Baughman VS.. Reed ct als.-Let an alternative
writ of prohibition without any stay of pro-
Court in Bank on Mon5ny, May %. 1887, at 10 \.
NJ. of said day. SEARIs c. j.
Department One.
FRIDAY, May g. 1887.
Court met at 10 A. NJ. AcKinstry, j., presid-
ing; Temple, j.. Pattersens j.; Paulsell Deputy
l2,102-Estate of Genn-Pnrsuant to stipula
ton on file, ordered cause be submitted upon
briefs on file.
Il, 590-Ward VS.. Mathews-0Fdered cause be
submitted on briefs on file.
Il, S6-Turner ct al. VS. Moere-Upon motion
of Gale for respondent, ordered cause be sub.
r-.ttt n1r Irra SCvaf 10
12,0Sl-Gale VS.. McDaniel-On motion of Gale
for respondent, ordered cause be submitted ON
briefs on file.
12,l10-Hilton ct al vs. Young-on motion of
ted on briefs on file.
IL. 5S9-Davis VS.. Baker-Argued by Gale for
appellant, and submitted.
II, s66-Murdock VS.. Clark ct ai.-Motion to
dismiss appeal argued by Holl and Hart for re-
spondent, and Goodwin for appellant Appel
liant allowed ten days to file brief, respondent
five days to reply: motion to be thereupon sub
mitted. Cause to be submitted per stipula-
ton TO be filed
Department Two.
FRIDAY. May 9th.
The Court met pursuant to adjournment.
Present: Thornton, j., presiding Sharpstein,
J.: Mcfarland. j.; Williams, Deputy Clerk
Finkler Bailifi
Il, 9l6-Morgan vs. Tiilotson ct al-Pursuant
TO stipulationS on file herein, ordered respond
emf be allowed 40 days TO file brief,i appellant
- days to reply; cause to be thereupon sub
mitted.
12O0l-Hausling vs. Hausman ct al.-Upon
suggestion of dimunition of record ordered that
appellant be allowed to filescertfed copy as to
the " identity of certain afiidavits" Further
ordered respondent be allowed 10 daysto file
brfef,l appellant 10 days to reply cause to be
thereupon submitted.
12,0i0-Applegate VS.. Simpson-Upon motion
of futile cause ordered continued for the term.
11,66i-Hunt VS.. Steese ct al.-On motion of
Beleher ordered appellant be allowed 20 days TO
file brief cause to be thereupon submitted.
On motion of Belcher cause ordered submitted
on bGIefs on file.