The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1887-06-23

eonnsston With The scheme was against s MsSes as
h .aS became President of the company to 0Os'
Examined rs to the issue Of $500, 900 of bonds
mao Ts ayound h. snsh %
tiS1 from client e counsel which he was pro
he SAID escept cents WI Theirs nc S SaS
only one consultation, and no received an i'm
81 Gns 81 SSs
was given him for guido.
Mr. Psrsons-so far as nj. Sharp Is concerned We
ss Everything passed Ss.rssn Him and
vssn Ssss q, ss,, SAs .
Of ssni ssIs
ihiaS Anything regard ny own actions
s.si ~; 81;
4 them Could not b guessed az S ' any
sssa' s sss" .n1 in -ss r Sss
8-WWiII you produce themi Al win not;
thoso Sona. &I no consulted Win about
After long tS wiring from the Wit
bonds was decided, upon Of consultation with
Foshay. Sharp, and Kerr, the witness parrying
every question: no said:
sfR
VIII not swear that he was not present. but have no
NsSl@Wiil YOU produce your book. to show POI.
not except ~ order Of tho Court On 'n'' PONY
MI again waived 3D.
closure q anything else IN, the witnesses rela-
tons with Sharp. As to the events attending
Bright testified:
ss sss u
decline TO say what other Of my clients were there
ss s'e es Il s:
tom nicton soad Be-
& oo 10 s sna
sisy
into
yers and the witness over this point, which re-
suited in the Court deciding that Mr.. Bright
5n Ss ts thss ssh and
a5s sssss
% Fl. yn s III ssf5
his e @ 70 an
II a fa
said h aa %a ss Is
to grant Injunction against any contemplated
to liz
p pei in Now Yoft Oh
crS a. ' g .ssn
% sSTs' 'a sss
<: ss;:ss ss
&c eondna upon se n 81
The 2 tho s On on
did before signing n: order =, n,,n,.. ,n,
IA III y r. ss :S
.,:s "a
a III; ss5so %
Ts1iCn 70 d. bonds
told BIN III q Sss nsd e.
ss"ry does not agree with yoaTs lie very mSee
Oh hs and had
that no Of Gut y %
f.s;ss sss e e ss
was emitted e, f. q matter .
a. Sss S
I'm iss!s s e
Ssisi: e sa s
Ssss ' sisne spii he ordsr '''A ''N ~
During some parts Of this story Mr. bright
himself for full mnute until the lawyers be-.
gan to ask him whit WINS the matter. Return
Ing to tho case proper, he said:
After returned from Judge Bartet.1 saw one client
ssn .s hs
order entered stood around the corridors with the client
y HG his to ne thy
the City Hall Whsrs snt c Sssns to
and wsS Until III
On the order of Judge Barrett the witness.
panied him, told where he went in the City Hall
that morning.
s
:psa KIM orr waving esad Gts?xSSd
a sna
sS sss
the meeting Is untrue.
Judge Barrett the Ttess to brine
to the presence OF Sharp ut consultations In
s his e. It s the BE comSSs Sfs o of
s wesH 4uestions involving other Clients Judge
Barrett said he would hear argument at some
Mr.. Bright resumed the witness chair after
refuse to produce his books, but that he was
clients interests. MT. Nicoll asked him to
give the name Of the client he was with at the
Judge Barrett insisting that he should answer,
Mr.. Bright said that 1t was " Mr.. Richmond"
BY Mr. Parsons-You have been asked regarding your
relations with Billy Moloney, What we're those Ies;
Aldermen; and our relations with him seems to mo to
be perfectly natural and proper
Q-Wsrs you here when the statement was made that
Ss H.nsa sO hs
M Briabt-I was not here. I read It, however.
Odd anything ever occur to Justify such state
meat A.--NothlnR whatever. -
Nco-Dlring the consultations between G you
cerng method OF convening the Board OF Aldermen
o.NWas that meeting arranged without your knowl
edge. A.-No, can't say that 1t was,
Mr. Bright's books arrived at this juncture
The members OF Mr.. Bright's firm have q habit
at the close Of each days work OF stating all
who copied 1t into q large book. called the
diary. Mr.. Bright went through this book, and
the promoters Of the broadway Surface Rail-
road. namely, Sharp. Richmond. and Foshay
frau In Communication with him On