New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1887-10-26
EARNEST WORK IN THE CONVENTION.
IIGHr FOOT, GENERAL BAKNUM AND e. V rAGNrpp
FAVOR NICOLL AND MARrINF-EDWAED

NiL' llt IL. fND JUN u. iANNiN
OPPOSE THEM.
The convention called to order after O'Clock
by Colonel Cruger. The large hall densey crowlo
the a'cs being filled well rs the Most OF th,
prominent members Of the Republican party preS-
ent as delegates OF spectators Prominent among these
were Cornelius y. Bliss, John +. Plumber. EdwarI
Mitchell. cXJuige Horace Russell. John Reissnweber,
Ehu Root. Clarence W. Meade Ashbe r Fitch, john }.
OBres Jacob Hess Charles y. Taiutor. John d. Law
John J.. Brodsky Henry krop William II. Beany,
j. Thomas Stearns. Theron 6. strong. Frank
Raymond, sOlon smith. samuel II Randall Robert 4.
Greacen, Sheridan shook, Jacob " Patterson. Johu T.
Wndoph, I.ufus L. Andrews, Frederick : GIBBS. Henry
c. Backus, Henry Hirch. Htrwooi r. Pool Jane, W,
nawes, Frederick 6. Godney. Ferdinand Eidman John
T. Nugent. James ". Perry. John II Grimes. Dennis
snoa, Jonn H. Gunner. ir. John simpson. Bernard By
lin. General Joseph C. Jackson. Henry g. petlcr. T. q.
lie and : V X. Cooper
MR. MITCHELL AGAINST DTNOCEAr.
After tle roll had been cs,d ami tie order ia which
the nomination, should be- made Ia been decided ipol
Edward Mitchell took Tho noor and oaefed oioails
resolution:
,s h1. c Tor 115 o : a2 %, y,s;e y to ,r rpon % @
mate 81 inlorse any hcno.St f'r iocAi oee Aprilu,s
A motion by samuel H. Rainfall that tho resolution -
laid on the table was no, seconded aul Nh Mitchell
mounted the platform AMI said:
Mr. CHNEH,N The rcs,lut on which have offered
WAS written by me only lew minIte' since lntis
cOlched iu these general becau.c desire discuss
son or tl, question on general principles tnI no,
the question OF individual nominations. II -
perfectly apparent thai eithor the doctrine here
pressed sound an Ought 10 he followed else thathe
reverse is The ssuud proposition AMI that Demo-
Gratis sGouI be aominaed In all the counties OF the
ot Nrwl0rk. have worry nrn convictions - 10 tho
policy pursued ~ TIE COIuty OF New lnrk and effects
Whenever tue Republican party has nominated III
do..'d any Democrats.
II ;hr Democratic patty chooses nominate unHmsl
Tor Office ami The people hy ihor votes give
App.au~c.l Is IT ID nc that when Democrat
refused nomination by his own parry bcrauss
lie l. believed To be an honest man. The Republican, parry
J., 20 DE- called upon 10 tI~e 40 tie rejected caniatei
Voices. No. For WHAT Not because he J., superior
10 hInd eds Ot Gep1b.icans IAsrr j. NJ diculfr
lcc'iu- from The Ecruucau ranks men Ot Igch ability
anr Democrat. voice. ">tick 70 the bush ak
accoriaaco with new w,pdper suggestion will his
yp'c icr tie EopuI tcan tate caeti Il any pre-
pared that such Democrat Will stand tlS
Ic~i OF tho EcpubcLa tl,kcti
Sow II tAcro hc Democratic faction ul-saf-
isurd wlth The Democratic nominations | ak
whether those Democrats who are dissatisfied ais
to take much pIirs election day 10 .pr htr
state Ticket leave Il for veu ~ drrrH.lgc whether
they 10 come oGt tLc} VII not vote Tor The Dc.nOc
ticn-t Tho views cNpressc IN TIL, resolution nv
firm conviction oher II IN NJ fdctOLs .p.lt ha,o
lithrrtD voted for aay xan nominated hN Republican
convention but dGc ,re 10 You that helct.orH shall
icc Ibs0yed from the require luon 10 VOC Tor Dcm
ocrtl vino may br nOnln' 'ei We carrlN tlal oHiy
lepu,i shall vote at prnnir"s. in tho
hc' what Republicans. bar what Democrat, .At.
selected .Ibmf That tins re~oilou i soub ,i4f-
81 pie. Important upw. an next tlu VIII he of
Portdnsc. APPLAUSE