The Lake Charles echo. [volume] (Lake Charles, Parish of Calcasieu, La.) 1876-1898, 1887-12-16

vas HHfporiinp. 10 And Il. e sisas s,ss.s,s....,
We ~ llilF ~ which isrrli ~ = So 81 4f;
1sat. fae plaeeds Iha 'fgitqft 81 m sfs4
Natiil lllatiHf ia5iR Conducted fhat ssasnst,5s,-
Noleq ~ taat elaetigH aud fnlniah.sd fbs
-5 sass fanaa that aefe requisite sar IA
he refgrg agaEh 70 De uniss 81 Re na,t,
eneh D. iait office have befofe r15{a1-,59l
t1ls statement ard Showed fhst ti,e mis- lf3s
f,s - nun me f10t that Ee aid Ia
lileIiaia 1llu 60 out uf piliua
y ben refused 70 Fevol1f 0nfza tha Sat.
I ffffnnneut N9en The lInsuted Gov W{jt5
+ s3sal U4an bae CiHanntent Wa beRra sI,1 4
~ les1 worried mp until il bls assumed tjts
4 NbeIQf 9piis and strength N a sfJ4pt 4st,s.ES,
4tEaui1Hti0n. Rasd tbo paper ~ tTa 151ag
~ lAiuleiAna and you VIII lind nrDrle egi-
AeAea q eQulplaint against fle sFFni53iafss =
ll.-H o. qfF- Aiehoils. Bfd from those tgbo
ere hupfnrtlua him to-daT. E1f fllFse 49,
no organizsd apbOHitiau ecsjrsf i,is JS,;,,i.
] lfailun- There vas no faction Thea foriiss
Z hhq ofgaulGed 90 lead war l7Dra a T1f,,1S,-
I g4alis aallil1il etfa ton. Now we h8re fip1
rvs Sf,esslls and BIZ friends organizing al over
I I hare traced tilis discomfort from H. ~.
I &inilpg, and hare followed II rs III 7e{s5f38v
DO feft9nilg man in The 3tafr WI ReT{s. fi3sf
IA PARTY q s97. Nichols has ntsuined a dis-
4 Rnet nniae They call fhemselxes Reform
I bemoeralH. We have ilot ~ aEcer4s1,'s,5
! what they propose to reform. T7slf ifs9s5 80
nQtmce0 no policy except that "a a as9ar-
1llleq opposition 70 the present State admin
IN referring to the
1ETTEHs wH5ca M WROTE 70 M.
i one Qf which hRa been published eoiie5tsnp
I eef tnin afp0tEi3lnentg f1f his frieutis IN I'M
4 Dtute otiees ln New Orleans be eaYB refer
flhg % the letter recommending Tom I4#flsy
~ ~ e9leetor, that i wHs personal ard
private between nian and man.h Ne SAYS n
was moi sens 10 tie State House. bit ~ 40
~ S4aftes Hotel II was, nevertheless. an
0inel4l letter, and has remained n the Ex-
eeqtiRe Qihee' Az recommendations for
office are public documents when filed. m
one 81 the letters requesting the reeaggiti0p
81 ms lGte HFpGIutGHg, n whom ba was
Z most Interested, they were appointed Hpd
I tiAs letter 3lke t434ers remains Gs an Official
I Document IN thg Executive Office Wl3T{Tgg
I On such . letter the word fipeTsona1a d5ee
i n4s lQfake y iase public document Bat I'd
I mt mat Il was & private letter, Gov Nieholis
4 Aad made charges against me for pers9nal
i appointments end the letters were lsed fgr
the purpose q not only refuting the charges,
4 opt ~ show that be was UnSiOus 10 look Af-
I ter his friends. There ID a very Eal6qbje
work on Me Philosophy III tito Human
MUD Z py tue tat8 Thomas Brown, professor
/ "a moral pilli9sorhy in the University Of
EdlnbQrgt. II IL work which viii com
amend TO the orators Of the reform partv /
I tMnk they viii find IN II some instructive
1eeeang, N sTlFl1g on the duties of friend
I Sssi,,. II 49, ~, = I " Va,fsgst 4li.l,
says, vol. 2, n 3q9:
What was cpnhded to us in years Of confidence
4thpnll 9e still AZ safe ~ our bpaola rs before.
allowable fgF u 70 vioiata fhs trys IN tjte si9ii.
\ per2f opr reputation Ny theponfder himself II
I sure q fhs secret which be has tElstad to us
4 @euiq render manifest our innocence. BIS very
tact intiineaeu to us that his trust Il Al ca end
d Gen. Nichols further ltates III his address
4 ~ ,ss,,ief ~ 49, ~ y u ~ y
lhg ctitttl pa ZEE ipf eitelal posltlqn was ~
/ 81. Charles aVenHe, wherein ! asked him to
4 advise me -; ia men and 1,tfastt5as ,5,H IN
i Tie letter WAC d I513ivofe NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. 4
lllaNe ~ fsG9Eleetlqn q airy sugh Gopyetsa-
N f Ply 4 wy raise Ro ISSUE vain gen MICH
I ton that did solicit his advice Tin the ,ay
Of measures and men, certainly received
10 i,5if,fs fT5,1,s i,i1,3 S 70 =, 1,s5 5S{ u ~
80 + III Ia - es'A4 90 W i'7oouAs7l D4' q "
TIE FOLLOWING LETTER,
~ " 2 ~ S9ss Ivy eI9ae Y ply
y. ~ "A isiss psee VIZ ~ W. eApe-
glGd to have received, but at the solicitation
Of some Of bha appheants The others did
EyL Fge y, hli M "a so put 20 saSE 90
80 ,,r7r,,,s No, ,ss,
Gov a r 5,F,Is,sy5
n 40. s5.,-.'-,,... r s,st,,. 4. ,,,l A., ,,,
1rff1 NraHFs
i,sis stsrsoil 3f'5,e5f ~ MGR ~ M - III
nv otinion faifhfn{iy and pr6oeriY Der.
formed their duties and 70 Rel.efal salts
teqEion 4 fayanse q Eezigtfer u yotaEs
9ia s w w N NJ,
XVI ~ ,srss ssi III lyg9n sfsS Gs IA gj, ~
s Ets s1se 5 Rssa AK VA "A g sB 22F "a
YOU Is Their behalf 1do'so u iny own iaotion,
believing thega to be coippetent end efHtient
oifoefs The 6s.sf board n rQpr tnsneqtore az
pointed ~ me Rers hllpoiptea under tessdyRn-
si ~ ~ 4S 49, ~, S Siiei ~
Foiflssg. va ~ si rs NJ siieial md gxqigsise
refet eice 10 qasiifeations ~ theiF posi1foa i
sant Capt Flower q MI 1f Tue lhrg5 aolir holise6
tityIclRaele aIa SCI ielsl pnd each layIse
tg4pslntn nallleg Rltinsf Ehatn ~ TX 0raer
I'M. tttl MI II, HI e I'm ee d NV
M, e6tiS, i4if VI tils beard. III the contrary
beii6Fe e Gas seen uidFela.tily racognfzed AZ
madeupot the best material iaIqoipted fsFa-
aae yndsr itg,sstai5qes Eliph mace as rs
s tt NJ ~ ~ III ~ ti 1890 ts w ~ ~
Eva NV j nave M ftsl 10 y6li, ~ sssf aog
efneF "a as n one sjfslo lattcf rs bring "a your
notice thpAe 81 my iate apfoiptees in ghoFn AZ
Ipnst intgsested 5aQ M know Nl,ethef % not
NM NV VI Y sS goe s WIN
dnGt of flese gsnEleinep Yoilrgtrgly
hNANtA n SleHotA4s,
There iR nothing IN this letter that Il OBJ
ieotpnable. ! only referred % y b enslger
lie charge q pergonglianl aud - show thot
,
itgosunle they, we're aud ought to have bean.
Gen. 0Rdsn was lcilld enough To advise Tpe
az 10 measures, ana fixed day When lie
introduced Mn 0glesby, whose wise Bugges-
tionB from tiIne To Time have keep d great
seryiqe to tlte State ~ the management II
her tinanceH.
Ia one ~ Ills usual and ollaEaetplistie
speeches, Judge y. y. White makes some
conimantR on the address delivered at Nom
roc. Neither be nor Gen. Nichols nor any
of the reform orators have ebtenlpted to
eonirOgert the faets stated Ia that address,
M. Ramsey, Of Union parish, denies that
Louisiana has made prQgrdss in proportion
10 her aister States, but qtfers no evidence Y
prove hiE allegakien, and doubt II le had
access toa single report from RpE State "
which no referred. AbNaHR wild aesentiqn,
like MANY otlleTa made W the refpl5pefe,
made iii the beiiei tllNt the purity Of their
motiyess the grandeur % their moral cllpt,
arters, their ltrseltish IliEpoges as man
n their yeclaTa5one that they are n95t pQ-
iitiuel office seekers, VI give weight te their
dqelafatloBs 2Ad supply tile went 81 Cyl