Seattle daily post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1887-02-25


Il CsaEt viii opsa here on he sssh inst
win 3adRs Hayt On the bsueh, unies.
JadRe Allyn, who has lass anaii6ed
shonId arrivs and take hls pIaec. The
uurnber % divorce eascs now awaiting
. bearing 10 qaife remaxkahle. Th<
o1nea ara e. follouHs
SAMUEL ". AnBts II. oieEens-They
wsKe married at Wiskinaon. w T., %
t1e IEt1 of My. 1878. and lived -
2ethsr uatfi Aprii. lsez. uhen tue wife
aband med tbs piainflA. O1e child.
Eva. vas born 70 then- 1he Rruund
upon which divorce 10 eaksd Is thas 81
deaerti0n.
Patrick +. Gieason "a Mary-They
weFs N ArFied Of Portland on the 18Th Of
| Ayr l. 1881. The Defendant IL plaintiff 3
second wife. A ehiid vzs horn % them
on TIE l5sh Of January, 1Se2 Tue hos
eaaa complains of viii and nnrees1ns
tie jealousy, snapieion and hatred %
| Tbs p8ff Of the wife, and frt qae1t iasnlt
End WronR 81 her hands hse8ass Of IL;
that on the 18Th Of Angusa. 1885, the de-
fsndant sold the plaintiffs household
| property, kept the money aud deserted
aim; that be foll0usd her 10 Portland
and prevailed upt n se' 80 rsfnrn With
hin 20 Taooms; that on Abe 18Th Of
Jane, 1886. she again deserted him and
oo7finues 10 live apart. Toe plaintiff
sass far divorce and demands fhe Gus
t0dy Of the child
Christine A. Lard W. Narois A. Lard
They were married IN 1886 The wife
charges the husband wishs cruel and in
haman c0ndaet and With having, while
they resided at Port Rlakely, driven
her from bis home and refused 20 ALLOW
her 90 retnrn-
Catrina Lettiek ". John-They were
married IN Austria in 1874 and lived
there together for nine years, wben
they came to this country. Piaiufif
charges her husband with cruelty, ha-
bituAl iutempeFanSe sad failure te
provide.
AlvsTtis Brauin W. Flora F.-They
we're married on the 18th Of November.
1873, 10 Kaasaa. The plaintiff charges
that during Q residences AZ Slater, Mo-,
between January, 1853, and July. 1886,
his wife vas untrue TO tin, knowledge Of
which did not some to him until In July.
1886. Hs axis for divorce and tbs Gus
tOdg OF their three children.
Thomss Humphrey ". -Emma-They
we're married et TiptoB, California.
November u, 1877. The plaintiff
aIleees that his wife deserted him in
1886 without o. 81.
Brock Johnson W. Lacy E.-They
we're married at Reno, Nevada, in sep
tember. 1876 Toey lived together until
july, 1885 when the wife deserted
plaintiff, 90 be alleges.
Annie 3. hiDey vs. James E They
we're mari d IN Kane county, Illinois,
Nov. 8. 1868. Toe plaintiff alleges bFp-
tai treatment, frequent assaults while
they lived at Puyaliup. and fnal deseF-
ton and failure 10 provide.
Alex. Oronbie IS AmaDda.-They
we're married in Michigan In 1880. The
plaintif Charges his wife with having
been at very serious fault with China
man at Carbonate In August, 1886, and
with divers others, and earnestly seeks
g divores.
Lizzie NJ. Bsall W Alfred.-Tbey we're
married 10 OstobeF. 1873, at Centralia,
W. +. The complaint IL deseFtion.
Mary e. OCh nan W. ). @. Coffman.-
They were married at Olympia Sept. %,
1879. The petitioner complains that
the husband has wholly neglected to
provide for her or her Eve children for
the past three years and tnat be has
compelled her 30 live upon the charity
Of relatives.
Matilda @. Cooper W. Robert c.
They we're married az Liberty. Indiana,
Jane q, 1863. The plant fl charges the
husband with being untrue to her and
that this circumstance has been follow
ed by distressing humiliation 10 her;
that be has treated her bEutaily and
threatens to take advantage Of her pres
ent illness By disposinR Of and appro
priatine q share Of their community
property. The plaiRtif prays for di.
voFce; fer the custody Of their children.
aud that an INJUNCTION isaue restraining
she defendant fro@ carrying eat his
threat, and also to prevent his coming
near her while the Use u pending.
Agnes Spence vs.. Janss.-They were
married IN Scotland IN December. 1884
rhe complaint 10 that Of cruel treat
meat. the plaintiff alleging that upon
one occasion. when plaintiff had been
at work Washing oil day. her husband
came home in tue afternoon aud upos
slight proveoaiisn growing out Of 8
references TO a mel khoer, he .straek her,
knoeked Der senseless and dishgured
her. She further charges that the hus-
band has deposited with Mary MeMil
Ian, her (plsintifss) daughter, $1,000
With the purpose Of preventing her from
receiving anv part OF it.
Essie n. Neore ". William B.-They
we're married in August, 1885. They
resided IN Port Townsend, where plain
til alleges be treated Der with great
cruelty, frequently beating and choking
her until she became insensibie that
be frequently snatched her hat and
cloak from her In the street and kicked
them about and this IN the presence Of
/ others.
In the ease Of Elizabeth Mcdonald vs..
John Mcdonald, petition on the
grounds Of cruelty and desertion, q d.
vaTcs ts granted Albert Whits referee.
Tie case OF Watson W. Watson IL still
before Referee Wintermute.
TIE LINE AROUND TIE Bar.
Engineers we're sighting through their
| traRsits along the head OF the bay on
Wednesday morning and driving stakes
for the lins Of the Northern Pacific into
Tacoma. Several lines have b-eu sur
veyed for this approach, but, IL seems,
none have been entirely satisfactory.
Oae Of these hogs the side Of the hill
until well through the new addition,
swiaRins around asd touching the main
line near the car shops. Another runs
q little fartheF north, cutting through
!. H. LISTERS foundry and tie sawmill.
Is Is stated 10 be the design Of the CON-
pauy 10 abandon the present line, which
rams directly vest through the Puyallup
= seryation and connects With the main
line uadsr The Tacoma hotel. This will
follow the building Of the ne . road and
the location Of she proposed union de-
pot Tnis latter figures in the direction
~ the lines run yesterday morainR. ~
itsexAot location Is not yet determiAed.
whether IL will stand on the q Ats or on
Pac &c avenue near the present statioB
is still under debate.
Tag NISrH STREET MIDDLE.
Measrs. Hannah, Lillis and BsshfoVd
form a committee Who vsll meet With
the property own ~ Of Ninth street 20
discuss The question that has nj ads 10th
Of these parties unhappy lately. They
Gill meet ct the Council Chamber op
saturday morning. and the Coancil will
bod an adiSnrned mes ting on Monday
evening a 80 O'Clock - hear the re-
poFt Of the committee. The principal
properly owners on Ninth street. are Of
she lover Fars--the art which has long
besn graded-bat they are assessed Jest
=. = -. kmsw So