The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1887-12-18

band was an old French sea Captain Of Ine
now. They were divorced through me.
Mr.. purr's HANDSOME DETECTIVE II A pArsY.
INDEED.
when a man, wants to bs divorced from 5,a his
wife have q handsome n deteSt rses wno t 10 Ss
anything more than to have the couple caught
in an embarrassing situation, Couldn't You
bring nns. MRS; Lord dSWp and Introduce nor 70 my
u This : p sI%,1sr oro was nSs s sss:R1iSa,M NM NeIlt oTd.
EMas p s s' rave sd nrSp more aa aVHSs.a and then de-
told Mr.. Lord to have signed by Mrs. Lord,
Alter that was done he e was e. come back to MIR,
Dun with his wiLe and a suit for divorce would
al. once DO put through.
Here Is the Price $40:
THIS rs A SORT OF HALF DIVORCE.
Der. one thousand eight hundred and eighty seven. be:
s New 9S Ssat IL NJ 4; l ar, q s. sss i ssa fGsais' L ord s y NJ. y
ma Ssh s's Hss E, SSn n 81 s,,1 h sS w,ss; Of .n a. s :sSSp q P Ysx
YORK.. trustee Of The third part
.r Ess' s:ss s.ss' IS :,: .ssIs p. sps " s2f sss ss slri ss9s "a AK \:
said wife, 70, which reason they have consented and
ss.s and apart from zach oshst dasns, tSs,, natural ne
o1e he sfs. ' part in u eon.idsrssios 81 Inc prsmisss and Il
pursaane. thsLeSt doth hereby coysn.nt p Pr mis- and sRS
rs SEss SAID a VIE L ina. Il snail saif and may I Be- lawful for her hi:
s spsr, r from Al si an s si%' sha s%'I Ss sssll 70 and ,vs viii sfp s6ss AND AND
p pss, i. s;T e a Isii fsm sns e. s IN ' With p sass . .Ia RtaSsfs i ass a
ana other persons and % follow and carry on such !sss
ssS;asI | S. sa 70 3 r W. : soT IN l' EIGS :s Ri%: 81 md n, ss.T n5 sTs%
6,;;qrS, q s ,.eHSls any 20 G. ssIb psII.Snn .hO ans ,S.; &c for vii ri
no, Without her con:sn. Visit her; d knovinsy enter
any hop.. or place where she shall dwsll reside, Q, BE-
her. nor shall Or win at any time hereafter claim q DE-
i nsnda so sns . St ' goods n'nff Sin,l ls~s'' or p'A. ssees si'' IN
,rsss Ehic :. NJ, Ms,oR RG ~, n ,sa, on in nss p g, any e si%e Ssr or
srter have, buy. or proeurs, or shall s. devised Or gwen
. & n, Ind q maj sss!: .n,o Va. snS G' as. I ,s Slspc.. an. y: ,s ss, s. nh:
"a, X I ~ =. sS Tsfs s. ! is% rs SOL; sSs s And, u Dap, sSstl an. a1d Viii fHf' nsii
I &: ard r h. n Hsis:i Lo :saPS Sss e s.s rs AZ :e% Sc ats =
dollars At the signing ana sealing Of this and indentuss,
sarss to sA ;.t .s'f a r iai :s,l. Ia s:sa1 Psr P ssa : Ss'S ss' :ss
AND il Is further agreed. I, either shs party Of the nrs.
D Dsr.e o. , shs .ss9na F Il ,n m ..;s.. , spr. ri. a.. e any sG snd
in S,1Sas.. !: =, g e ,sI ISSiiy e ssI,ss, out Nm. y n p q ssn,:,; &, &,
s I might Or should d,1 b made al. bus ! u. 4, R.Fiy who mIss.
Of Of t ahM. same ana . / in Az. ~ event of divorce being granted
one dollar to him duly paid, does covenant and agree to
and S sssr him i inaq lessor Of and III from al debts Of his said
BY m!f s.f sU or on Ssl account S5 saas % anS 4 fs he ssId % pare. sss's q he
first part shall be compelled to pay any such debt or
on sa0t a.@ !" al, 70 't .%s ssi %fI party a !: lie sr rsp part ~ with IN" ali
.a sa S''n assir " nsmss an. IND s sa,s t Rh,t assn e %sy Of hs ssss%,
Witness: TAraiE Loap. Seal,
HENRY L. DORSEY. JONI ANDREWS. lseall
On tho back Of the paper is this receipt;
Reed nss,a Soy yo Ss ,ss7i o, g q n. y, 81 L ,S,. s at.y aSllsrs' the
HIrTir LoRD.
The endorsement was:
Charles NJ. Lord and Hattie Lord, agreement for sep
Grafton Of Charles N. Lord and Hattie Lord.
HOW A suPPos1TITIoUs WIFE WAS CozENED OF
HER RIGHTs.
1t is built on the regular printed articles Of
cannrnfinn no n lasic hnf phnnf fhrna-nttp rtnra
way down all tho significant part comes. This
is not in the usual printed blanks. hut is a sort
Dun to give designing husbands. and wives a
chance to cheat each other. The interpola-
ton Is:
And it is further agreed II either the party of the first
having jarisdie!ion If The same tihias ri, .srssmsnta and
adiyGrco; and md, further y neither q 3 party !: 70 e n. ass,, the
ton might or should be made, but the party who might
or should secure q d div r ,h sh. ALP pay =, al A. costs e and S.G Sx,
granted no alimony is to be paid.
= That h is vi where the tf Eist of Of the bn,h long pss sttrun Ea SHt
suit. Mr.. Dun explained all the preliminary
yerbiage about divers disputes and differ;
mens was written in. Mr.. DufTs hand. which
corresponds to the letter that Mrs" Duff
% %Tisitor n answer to tho advertisement OF
NJ: Duff wanted suit to be brought in Penn.
sylNtlih, WucEo Le udtu lIlCuus. ~ odlo tuuI
all that was necessary would be to go over to
Chester county before Justice Ferguson and
sws;;; 20 a G r. pad Io; on the g &c bSl, OF absh,
in a few days. and he would look after It. His
charge would be $40 a day and expenses.
power to take dispositions. and Mr.. Lord could
go over to Pennsylvania and have his deposit
Where will the suit be brought 2' he was
I'm Armstrong county" he answered. ARM
Chester county. but he said he knew the Judge
In Armstrong county. and 1t would be all right,
he was sure.
N STILL THE LEIGH CALLS MORE"
long enough. time to enable Mr. Dufr to pre-
sumo that 1t had been taken to New Haven. 1t
was returned. signed by Hattie Lord. Charles
MI. Dun took This paper and read it over to
and a promise OF more. His demands We're in.
t ere a,hG, in s SIC; ana ne ns WSs asked Skoend how much IN
said it would be $50 for himself. and s35 more
to be paid him o rthe fees of other lawyers and
make u positive bargain for this amount. but
promised that 1t would BIO no moro unless some
extra trouble vas caused or extra court ex-
HIS NEW YORK COURT GIVES ABSOLUTE DIVORCE
FOR DEsERTIoN.
Mr.. Duff finally decided to bring suit for d.
yorce in New York on the ground Of desertion.
There Is no such cause for absolute divorce in
the laws Of Now York. but MI. Duff never in
structed his customer in tho divorce laws. ex-
eept to warn him against bad mon who pre-;
who swindled, confiding customers. The d.
yorce was to be brought in the name OF Mrs.
Lord. and she accordingly came down from
New Haven for that purpose.
1t WAS arranged that Mr.. Duff and a notary
wore to be at Mr.. Duf's office at s O'Clock on
Monday afternoon, and that Mrs. Lord was to
60 there and swearcut her accusations against
Mr.. Lord. Mrs; Lord could not manage to
few minutes before G o'clock she drove UP In a
cab; II was the, same young woman who had
applied for o divorce through the detective
agency. Mr.. Dun was in his rooms, but the
had been there, but had gone. The charge was
81, because the notary had come. and 1t was
time. A new notary would have to BIO engaged,
and he came extra. and would have to be paid
extra, 9esides1he 81 for the other notary who
Mr., Dun had a long legal document. He asked
Mrs. Lord II she knew the contents OF 1t. She
said she did after part Of 1t had been road to
her. He asked her II she was willing to sign
It, and she said she was. and signed 1t accord
lngIy. The paper was U COMPLAINT In q suit for