The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1887-11-09

VsVW = "
e sa@
Gss@s@
Hoadly Il ,451. ]. B. Foraker is the pres
ent Republican candidate for Governor, I.
e. Powell is the Democratic candidate,
Seitz is the Union Labor candidate and
Sharp the Prohibition candidate. In Ham,
iltcn county the returns received at s
o'clock indicate an increased vote over
that of 1885. Then there was no percep-
tible labor vote; now it is quite q feature,
exceeding in many precincts the vote OF
the older parties. Both Republican and
Democratic aggregates consequently show
a falling of. In the first returns received,
the Democratic falling off is greater than
the Republican. Sixteen precincts of Ham,
ilton county show q net Republican gain
of 912 The relative vote is: Foraker,
1854; Powell, 242; Seitz, 2S6; Sharp, 5.
The absence of the Union Labor vote in
1885, and its large proportion now in Gin
cinnati, causes an increase in the net Re-
publican gain in this county out o. pro-
portion to the total vote. Where the Ia
Dor vote has drawn more heavily from
Democrats than from Republicans, which
is usually the case, the Republican gain Is
increased, though the Republican total
may be decreased.
One hundred and eighteen precincts in
Ohio show a net Republican gain of l, ,923.
Foraker 1G, 700; Powell 10, S35; Seitz 2,949;
Sharp S6S.
One hundred and seventy-seven pre-
ciDcts in Ohio give net Republican gain
OF 9, 936 Foraker 25, 164; Powell 1861 !;
Seitz 2,491; Sharp l, ,1SS. The last twenty
four precincts make no change in the Re.
publican gain.
Forty-one:precincts, mostly from sHam-
ilton county, show net Republican gain
of 1,473 Relative vote: Foraker, 1860;
Powell, 3, ,3S2; SeitZ, ], 1,269; Sharp, 62.
Eighty.seven precipts in Ohio show a net
Republican gain of Lao. Foraker, IL, 414;
Powell, 1929; Seitz, . 1856; Sharp, 734.
One hundred and fifty out of 207 pre-
cincts in Hamilton county show Foraker
leading Powell by $500 plurality. 1t is
claimed that the ramainder of the Repub-
lican ticket will have much larger maiori-
ties in the county.
Two hundred and thirty-nine precincts
in Ohio give a net Republican gain of
4,10S. Foraker, 80, 140; Powell, 25,51S;
Seitz, 5.0s3; Sharp, l,666. Total, 65, ,408.
Three hundIed and one precincts in
Ohio (about one-seventh of the whole
number); net Republican gain, 4, 1857. For
sker, A, 479; Powell, 33 929; Settz, G,403;
Sharp, 2,123. Total, SO 934.
In Hamilton County the returns already
received show that Foraker has carried
the county by a majority OF possibly
3 600. Some estimates place it higher.
This, in consideration of the reports cur
rent during the day that Powell was re-
ceivipg Union Labor votes, would justify
the conclusion that the entire county
ticket of the Republicans is elected.
Three hundred and eighty-six precincts
in Ohio show net Republican gains of A.
| '947. Foraker. &C, 800; Powell, 46 974;
Seitz, 1874 Sharp, 8, ,25S. Total. lis, ,4O5.
The counties heard from giving Democrat
ic gains are Adams, Allen. Brown, Butler,
Champaign, Clermont, Clinton, Colum-
blara, Defiance, Delaware, Erie, Greene,
which gives 2S9 gain in ten precincts; Lo-
raine, 205 in seven precincts; Muskingum,
Perry, Pickaway, Ross, Seneca, Shelby and
! Wysndot. The counties from which Re-
publican gains have been reported are As
tabula, Carroll, Clarke, Crawford, Cuyaho-
| ga, Dsrke, Fairfield, Franklin, Hamilton,
Meigs, Columbiana, Pike, Portage, Preble,
Putnam, Richmond, Scioto. Stark, SAM
nit Trumbull, Van Vert, Wayne, Wash
| iDgton and Wood. In most cases only q
! ew precincts have been heard from, and
the gains are small except in Hamilton.
Four hundred and twenty-eight pre-
cincts in Ohio give a net Republican gain
| OF 5,074, in total vote of 134, 394. The
greater portion OF this gain is in Hamilton
| County, while the remainder of the State
is nearly evenly balanced. If the same
rate is maintained, Foraker's plurality
will be from 20, 900 to % 600.
] Six hundred and seventy-thTee pre-
clncts in Ohio, out of ,, 167. give a net Re-
publican gain of 5. 133. From the best
estimate that can be made at this hour
the Union Labor vote of Hamilton County
will reach about IL, 600 or 13 600.
The vote CT Hamilton County is of pecu-
liar interest. The comparison is
made with The vote of 1885, when
the Labor party was not organized.
The effect of its inroads upon the two
old parties is easily traceable by precincts.
In many precincts the depletion of the old
| parties has been from % to go per cent.
The loss falls most heavily on the Demo
Gratis, as shown in the increased Rspubli-
can plurality, but in some of the German
wards the Republican detection has been
| greater.
Seven hundred and three precincts in
Ohio give net Republican gain of SOIL.
Foraker, 113, 754; Powell, 81, ,17l Seitz, TO-
0S0; Sharp 7,174 Total, 22S.1T0.
Seven hundred and forty-nine precincts
in Ohio give net Republican gain of s.
497, in total vote OF 248sSS3. No more
returns will be received tonight. The
lnd1cations still point 10 plurality OF
from q, 900 to %, 600 for Foraker.
CLEVELAND, Ohio. Novembers the first
precinct counted in. the city of Cleve.
land shows q Republican gain of IL.
-Four precincts in Cleveland give Repub-
lican gain of 50. and one precinct a Demo-
cratic gain of 10. Twelve precincts in
Cleveland show Republican gain over
1886 of 2S1, and three precincts o Demo-
cratic gain of29.
Returns from forty-two city precincts
show net Republican gain of l, 21G votes.
In thirty-three precincts, or just one-hslf
the city, there is q net Republican gain of
S04 votes. The entire Republican county
ticket is elected, and Gov. Foraker's plu-
rslity in this county is probably 2,5e0.
TOLEDO. November 8. - Waynesfeld
township, Lucas County, Foraker %;
Powell 26. Spencer township, Foraker 6S:
Powell ~. Swanton township. Foraker
80; Powell 80. Net Republican gain, 30.
SPRLEeFIELD, November S.-Springfeld
complete gives Foraker 3,74S; Powell D.
55S. The Republicans carried the city
last fall by 179. Returns from 81 out Of %
precincts in CLARK County indicate o Re-
publican majority of 2 500.
Five hundred and fourteen precincts In
Ohio give net Republican gain OF 5, ,424,
in total vote OF 172, 1873. This is nearly
one-fourth of the State. The chairman OF
the Republican Central State Committee
claims that Foraker's plurality is &C least
4