Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1887-11-24
SUPREME COURT.
DEPARTMENT TWO.

TUESDAY, November 22d.
Court met pursuant to adjournment Present
Thornton, j., presiding: Shsrpstein, j.; Nc
Farland, j.: Williams, Deputy Clerk; Washburn,
Bailiff
r. 112-Bell ct al vs. Bean--Ordered TO be sub
mitted upon briefs on file
l., 1il-Baughman VS. Reed-Pursuant to stip-
ulation filed herein, ordered appellant be al
lowed fifteen days to file brief, respondent fifteen
days TO reply, appellant fifteen days to reply
thereto; cause to be thereupon submitted.
12,20S-Pharis VS.. Muldoon-Ordereda appellant
be allowed ten days to file brief, respondent ten
days to reply, appellant ten days to ieply there
to; cause to be thereupon submitted.
12155-Weithof vs. Murray ct al-Pursuapt
to stipulation filed herein, ordered appellant be
allowed thirty days to file brief, respondent fifty
days to reply, appellant twenty DAYS to reply
thereto; cause to be thereupon submitted
12,D7-Finney VS.. Curtis -Onmotion of Woods,
ordered respondent be allowed twenty days to
file brief, appellant twenty days to reply; cause
to be thereupop submitted.
l2,2O-Oullahan VS.. Morrisey-0n motion of
Woods, ordered that the appeal herein be and
the same is hereby dismissed.
l22l2-Moulton ct al. VS. Knappet al-Contin-
ued for the session
12,35S-Simmons VS. Oullahan-On motion of
Woods, ordered appellant be allowed twenty
days to file brief respondent twenty days to re-
ply; cause to be thereupon submitted
l2,37S-Berniaud VS.. Beecher-On motion of
Woods, ordered appellant be allowed twenty
reply, appellant ten days to reply thereto: cause
to be thereupon submitted, subject to motion to
dismiss.
n,797-Marshall vs. Beyser-Pursuant to stip-
ulation filed herein, ordered that respondent
may amend brief by inserting therein a refer
ence and citation to the cause OF Weber VS..
Clark decided October 81, 1887.
l2,Al-Learned ct al. VS.. Castle ct al.-Argued
by CARRIER for appellant, Catlin and Hall for re-
spondent. Ordered appellant be allowed twenty
ted
12,Si2-Hudson vs. Woodbridge Protection Dis
triet No. ct al.-Argued by Budd for appellant
Hall for respondent and submitted.
WEDNESDAY, November 23d.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present
thornton, j., presiding; Sharpstein, j.; McFar-
Bailiff
9.726-Knox ct al. vs. Higby-Pursuant to stip-
ulation filed herein, ordered appellant be al
lowed thirty days to file brief, respondent
twenty days TO reply, appellant ten days to re-
ply thereto; cause to be thereupon submitted
Adjourned for the term.
DEPARTMENT ONE
WEDNESDAY, November 2Sd.
Court met at $50 A. NJ Observation-Disclosures
j., presiding; Temple, j.; Patterson j.; Paulseil
12,151-Modoc County VS.. Churchill-Cause
argued by Barnes for appellant, Johnson for re-
spondent, and submitted.
12369-Van Cleave VS.. Bucher-On motion of
Spencer, ordered respondent be allowed twenty
FIVE days to file brief appellant ten days to re
ply; cause to be thereupon submitted.
Adjourned for the session.
IN BANK.
WEDNESDAY, November sd.
Court met at 10 A. NJ. Present-Searls C. j.,
presiding; McKinstry, j.. Thornton, j.; Sharps-
TEN, j.; Temple, j.; Paterson, j.. Mcfarland.
j.; Spencer, Clerk Finkler, Bailiff.
IL 343 and 12344-People vs. Greene ct al
Argued by Burnett for appellant, Thornton for