The Lake Charles echo. [volume] (Lake Charles, Parish of Calcasieu, La.) 1876-1898, 1887-11-18
sEKArOR D. 3. EUsrTs.
An Answer 10 the "Iteformp AttRplss on
Gov. McEnerY.

An answer 20 the "lfetorm" AtlRehs on
Gov McEnerE.
aenhtor Jas. b Eustin was tina next speaker
Hi W l'NuesN y ,yei' 1912. $3.50
WIN applause hh1 sp1he 10 l1AloAh.
ts1low-Il ti2ens--4 am .PaflcllaIiy plsaS3d
% have We 9pp9ttunlty ~ aadItss the
understand that Rfeht change mas thAen
plaee favorable W ne eapdidgey qf GOV. hle-
Emery Tor z Eenoqlina llopi, Ihis y tiie more
parish that the proposed nomination ot
Gen. Eich1lls received its first inspiration "
this State, The large number o. lniuentiai
eitzens who hitheltp we're opposed % COY
sst and boDest support, and eonlradict by
their voluntary action the change THAT the
people are dlshatlaied Win bic AdmiEiBtfA-
ton
Serious men do not become converts to q
cause which they have opposed unless their
judgment las TO Weld - she force otfehs0nj
apd when w, notice this Change going on
pariFh and The adjoining parish ok DE Soto,
the Argument that
M'EsERYB POPULARITY
s ts0 = 3 tt IN i,,T
ss9ds,1ees II bis ineressing sfrenRtii Non
Hsintarested quarters. The reform eratogR
Themselves have unc0paciously proclaimed
the great popularity and increasing strength
os Coy. atcEnery. They, have iastitied the
vince tic people that be il The only man Up
the State who cueId defeat Coy. McEpery.
QtheI gentlemen Who had . right 70 aspiFeto
the nigh office Of Governor, whose seryiceeto
BhOse private and public record no on9 can
agRail; whose Popularity Az VIII admit haYe
been told 70 suppress their asplrahone, g
aspirants 70 remain satisfied with nnde-
served onacurify IN this pending contest be-
cause, stronG as they may b, tley are ,l not
strong ep9ugh q aeisst 4eEyn Emery Inc
bestow upon bis administration can neyer
equal thai which this eWledRment u his
opponents betoteqs ~ confess that no
fully encounter Coy. McEnery is conteg-
sion that his adEni pis on ~ Strongly pop
ulAr and nnQuaAiionablE satisfactory 70 tile
people, lt has peen esid that one q ths Mo
the Democratic party. What element of uni-
hcadoD does tten. NlehQlis poskesa WHICH 10
not possessed By Jeffrles, punpipgbaDi,
W. Been espIsinsd % ths people nov, and ia
what respect, and Why the candidacy Of
Nichols more ihan the candidacy OF any
othgef q these gsntlsnen ai Ky pseify, nnify
The animosity Of
TtFE HFFt,nAf nEM0aa6cy
10 the McIlnery adninistrati0n Feminds one
III tb 49, fii5ty Nv N iii III u - sfs5 IN fls VIA
n NV x an N ,9pa INV ssn No Wi
Would sati6fy theni 4 xcept 4 Complete abdio8-
ton and surrender OF al power ~ their
hands, Every measure that le proposed in
the interest Of the people. every policy tbat
he advocated ip their behAif, every effort
thai be made % prol4Qte the welfare Of the
people, encountered their eatping CRITICISM.
BE VAS eccueed ot being governed by q
clique 3 kitchen cabinet. Bis motives ware
aRsqiled. He WIS charged WITH trying "
build np q perROnal party. He was necueed
Of appointing his friends 20 oslce, Of disf1-
gaTding the wishes OK the people, Of QeTsgp-
allsnl IN government and Of prulonBihg nv
Official e1letepce bE official patrohnRei yet
against the combined aaaalilts Oh Clay, Cal3
houn and Webster, he Has TWICE elgctcd
to The preeideheg end was allowed "
hame his own BuceessQr. This proves that
the people then coQld not ~ deceiYed
By mere catol5Woida, but thas they
looked at the results Of an administration to
desefmine whether Or not u ehonld receive
their approval and indorfemsnt. The people
Of t.oullapa are to-'l4y depending Why
should 1he Democracy q the STATE WITHHOLD
its eophdence trop the Depoefatie aapinth-
iFatiQn 0i Coy Actnery3 Y Ay hqH rs I0r-
te1ted their conh qppre = Why DOCS ne deserve