Morning journal and courier., 1887-04-19
News by Telegraph FROM ALL QUARTERS. |PARNELL RISES TO DENY That He Wrote That Cory
 Letter. MIR. HEALYe NOT RElhSIA1D. Second Reading Off, The
 Grimes Bill. TWENTY-FIVE LIVES LOST. An Attempt 10 Kill
 Marshal BaZaine.
HEALY MUST APOLOGIZE

Reinstate Him-Parnen Makes an
 Impassioned Denial - The Crimes
 Bill Read a Second Time.
 LONDON, April 1S.-In the House of Com mons this evening Colonel E. R. King -Har- mon made his debut in the capacity of under secretary for Ireland by rising amid the cheers of the government party and the groans and misses of the opposition to state that since March only two tenants have been evicted from the estates of the Marquis involved the eviction of sixteen subtenants. MT. Sexton asked whether the government would consent to rescind the suspension of MT. Healy.
 MT. W. H. Smith-My duty on Friday night was extremely disagreeable, but none the less plain. am sorry that was forced to ask that MT. Healy be named for trans gressing the rules of the House, but it is utterly out of the question to rescind the order of suspension in the case of MT. Healy or any other member who might be placed in his position when no apology for his con duct has been given.
 Mir. Sexton asked whether it was compe- tent for him to move to rescind MT. Healy's suspension. The Speaker replied that it was not, unless the motion appeared upon the papers of the House.
 MT. Sexton-Inthe absence of MT. Healy I am authorized to say for him that if Major will withdraw his language he will do the same.
 MT. John Bright asked why MT. Hea- ly was suspended and MT. Sexton was rot, when both had committed the same osense The Speaker said that ordinarily he would not answer a question implying partiality on his part, but he would say that in the sec- ond instance of breach of the rules an apolo- gy had followed the withdrawal of the ex- pression excepted to. MT. Sexton moved that MT. Healy be heard at the bar of the House. The Speaker over ruled the motion. Mr. Sexton then asked Major Sannderson to withdraw his Ian guage. Major Saunderson made no reply
 MT. Gladstone, addressing himself directly to Major Saunderson, asked: "Are you pre- pared to assist the House by withdrawing your offensive expressions. (Cries of "No, don't"
 Major Saunderson-I never alluded to Mr. Healy directly or indirectly, because I felt that as regarded MT. Healy I was unable to substantiate my charge so as to bring convic- tion to the minds of the House.
 The matter was then allowed to drop.
 MT. Sexton, resuming the debate on the crimes bill, said that Major Saunderson's attack on Friday night was mean and coward ly. He did not make direct and explicit charges that could be squarely met, but con- fined himself to insinuations founded upon scandalous rumors. The only way to argue r7ph o111ra ,ia with horsewhip or by action at law. MT. Sexton then proceeded to denounce the bill as the grossest violation of moral law, de- stroying at one blow all the cherished rights of the people. It was absurd, he said, to attempt to suppress 8 body so powerfully supported in Ireland and in America as the National league, the object of which was not to foster, but to suppress crime. The day that saw the downfall of the present govern ment would witness the cessation of coercion in Ireland.
 The Marquis of Harrington said it was very strange that that section of the Liberal party which was now receiving the plaudits of the Parnellites was composed of the same gentle men whom the Parnellites had previously denounced in the most bitter terms. These gentlemen had heard the only answer which MT. Sexton thought necessary and sufficient to meet the charges against him and his friends, charges made chiefly not within the House but outside of it. Could they accept that answer as sufficient? Was a bare, unsup- ported denial any proof? Was it any kind of a response at all to the evidence which SUD- ported the accusations made?
 MT. Samuelson's amendment was then voted upon, division showing it's rejection gro to 269. The second reading of the crimes bill was agreed to without division.
 Lord Huntington, replying to denial by Mir. Parnell brought out by the formers re- marks that the Irish party in Parliament were connected with the Fenian organization in America, said MT. ParnelPs denial in the face of the opposing proof furnished by the statement of the Times, together with the reproduction of MT. Parnell's letter, the pub lication of which was fully justified, was ab solutely worthless. Concluding Lord Hart, ington said the government would certainly succeed in restoring the authority of the law. It would be impossible for it to be perma nently paralyzed by the machinations of secret societies. MT. Balfour followed in sup port of the bill.
 Mr. Parnell rose to personal explanation and in an impassioned speech denied the story published in the Times this morning. The letter alleged by that paper to have been writtsn by himself MT. Parnell said was a forgery and obviously perpetrated for nc other purpose than to influence the division on MT. Samuelson's amendment and the second reading of the crimes bill. He had never seen nor heard of the letter until he saw it ie the Times this morning The phraseology was absurd and in every line it bore evidence of absolute and ir- refragable want of genuineness. He had never known that MI. Fosters life had been endangered or that there had been any con- spiracy against him. He (ParnelD been in Phoenix Park on that fatal night he would have shielded Cavendish and Burke from the daggers of the assassins with his so1h body, He.believed that he himself had suffered more than any other man. Referring tosthe bill MT. Parnell said he believed in his heart that the English people were opposed to ik
 MT. Gladstone said the passage of the bill would increase American subscriptions, not Irish subscriptions alone, bus those humane contributions that were redecting such 6 splendid light upon America. In denouncine the bill Mr. Gladstone said the clauses em- bodying the White boy acts ought to be sci ont in full The essence of the bill, he said was to suppress any organization and to secure a reduction of rent. This was not a crimes bill, it was not intended to suppress crime known to the law, but it was a bill that established thingf as crimes that never were crimes before Those familiar with the idea of the dagger and dynamite take satisfactory view of tht proceedings of the present government.