New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1887-01-28
FULLGRAFF HEARD AGAIN.


hay He consulted frequently with Peter Mitchell, one
q his counsel Tho Oyer and Terminsr courtroom was
rot we'll filed ExAdsrman Patrick Farley was among
h. spectators The prosecution was conducted BY
r., MARITIME, Mr.. Nicon and Colonel Fell
bwa Charles ". Brooke had charge OF
he defence After tho jury was completed Mr.
ioo opened the for the prosecution. He said that
a. proposition to take the first twelve men might have
seemed fair to unthnkiaG person. bnt II would not
have been possible to leave important case 70
Roughly chosen jury Ho then called attention TO the law
N relation to bribery and rectsd the facts which have
uown familiar in the trial Of McQusds BE spoke Win
much clearness He said that tho testimony Va
Iulgra and Duffy like tho testimony OK tnievos on
which receivers often convicted. He o"',oa
ex-Alderman FullRraf Is his first Witness fohx'"n
Sark fae was red and his answers given In low
voice. He said:
NV place Of business up within few month. was at No
$50 s .nsrs suriso.
b May. 1884. remember an INFORMAL "ee'inS oi Au''
that edshce tina, gon; h 9 s . NJ
leave 10 nterfogats the witness
This was denied and the witness continues
greeting Of The ,1 Aldermen ,ss st's de-
isSSan, wss present then There wers eight
~ sss
ys. ssE' 5s$s:.,
.si ISsg vi ali IS
that meeting would Sssr Ss SsS
e as Sfs'ss q NEE,
R. S MI sna nSn.s
vrong house Is but finally got to house "f
S~ many there In an Ary:.sysn .sa .00
cation would Be- made franchise Broadway and
quenty would be for uso cay to whom the e S %
! p E:yfi IN III, iso B sas'S''' "''N "
Then Fugrar told the same tale that was related at
Lacy the offers Of money and bond. and the agree
%sn Of the To Se sos~sy
proposition Of 100000 in cash, the debate as 70 how
sn sa a as
told Of the second meeting, and Mr.. Nicol asked Dd
Mr.. Brooke objected to the word combine " and was
into the language Of the United states"
hodsrSy the thirteen atle Than on
ns Mnade trial as he testified naf %sss
.na sSe 'f he e4 as County Sas cS
County Clerk and his friends have always held that he
aoS Of stakeholder was made by vote, each person
voting faye" to a motion that John Keenan, be named.
any extra needed to the franchise over
She Mayors veto they agreed have MOlonev do that
Mr.. Brooke-I object to the word "sgroei"H itnade-
Judge Barrett3when De Lacy said what you have te't
led ~ u done
Fullgrar-No made any objection.
The witness then described the next meeting at Nc
Loughlns house at which De Lacy suggested that the
price Of Aldermen must be reduced 10 $ZOOOO on &C
count OF the expense of lawyers, etc
Colonel Fellows-Yes don't forget the ETC."
s me VISIT Of MSonsy VIC to to the
CALL and the early meeting OF the aldermen on August
80 Justice Barrett war.- jurors not to talk about
Court o ssJ julius B. Arnold 81 Martin John Soan
Hs-c.ls Hebbsri James f. McVeany and ~ Brophy were
s% went anG the HoT House for dinner they viii have
charge OF the jury until the trial is closed OMEN dined
Mr. Nicol took up after recess the examination as to
Sa to 10
Mr. Nicol-Did Won SIS 600 part ofit
Mr. Nicoi-oS. Il you object will not ask anything
Mr. Brooke-we withdraw the objection. ,.r
MT. Nicolas you will. Now You may answer, MT run
The witnessI from De Lacy before cleo
and e5. coo In December OF January
In answer to Mr. Nicols questions Fullgraf said that
he had testified falsely before the senate Committee, He
gave for the first time the names of his lawyers
had an &yssT O %sp. SsS5S &S TIE rate
thirteen meeting agreed they did not know
have other COUNSEL Al retained ORLANDO P;Sw
4 HnmmeI.
Fugra said that he denied guilt before the Senate
toid Of his confessions to Mr. MARITIME Mr. Nicoll and In
spector Byrnes on promise Of immunity ,,
Mr. Brooke cross-examined Fulgrah at great length
he went much OF the ground covered by the qes
tionng of Fugraf by McQuade's counsel on the last
Aldermanic trial He began by asking:
o-Dd you testify the last trial Of Mcouade that
shs District Attorney showed you some Of the evidence
{od you had sufficient testimony 70 convict you. and
i alderman, 4 would make statsmenti Did you so
Mr. sroote-Now Your Honor that all the testimony
81 this witness IN 10 9,s matters 1e ~ S,
and reward and tnrSgsh ,hreats and Ga, fear
Fullgrah admitted his 'wiful corrupt and dellbre
ate perjury" but said done to protect himself and
others
,ess yourself "a" alone 81 %~Ses sir
The questioning was relieved by occasional side re-
marks between Mr.. Brooke and Colonel Fellows. who
were formerly partners, and exchange friendly stabs
The cross examination developed one new statement
INC PRICE Vas sy al s2o06 % said he thought
It ought TO be $4,000.
Fullraf was asked about his asscverations OF limo
eence TO his acquaintance until Justice Barrett said
The witness has said that he always denied his guilt II
you nifty cases OF denial that stronger than proving
The examination Of Fullgraf finished before the
remain tSsether in the custody OF the officers encou
aged them to hope that the case might be finished before
Jurors passed the night at the Astor House, while ONei
report was published in the afternoon that the de-
fence had found new witness In the person Of an In
mate Of Mcoughlins mouse in 1884 who would contra
dict the testimony OF Fullgrah and Duffy The article
said that Fuligraf and Duffy testified that young
opened the door for them on the evenings OF the
{oung womsn who would testify that OSei dd not vst
10. testify that young woman admitted them to Mo:
touRhlin's house, but said that Mclaughlin himself
opened the door let them in and out and that they
sew no other Inmate OF the hOnse The officials who
interested In the prosecution said that they knew moth
Ing OF testimony. 49, ,
Tie day began with No. in the jury box untitled
James r. Hindc Superintendent OF Irvine factory at
No 4Ol West Fifty sovenhst, finally put In It, He
seemed to be candid and fair The defence then chal
1cnged Rossi No g. and after several had been called
George H. Bend took his place He broker at NO AZ
Broa.st The District Attorney again assaed the oc
eupant Of the and Salmon Rose jeweer, at
No Gran Dist AfcP a.
~, Mr. Fakenburg challenged perenptoriy. He 10
. cousin of the Fakenburg who was arrested for en-
bracery IN connection with the McQuade trial His place
was filled by Marks Lask, a dry goods dealer at No.
spcnardt Both sides then announced that they were
content
Judge Barrett-Before deem II duty
10 ask each Juror juror viii rise bis