The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1887-02-25

Tue entries upon the trial aud appearance
dockets are as follows

Court Proceedings.
Tue entries upon the trial aud appearance
dockets are as follows:
To the strt docket:
Norris " Upton vs. john Z. Zimmons. VIM.
Young for plant IFS. Geo. Stuckham VS.. 9th
man Ma colin. Ii. W. Archer, s. Archer and
Han Ian " Webster for plaintiffs, Farnands and
Robinson for iefcnduu'. Patrick PreudibIc We.
John Price. Stump aud II. W. Archer for
plaintiff, Young and Archer & NanBibber for
defendant John w. Kemp VS.. X. q. Huston,
garnishce of John Mahon Young for plaintiff,
Cooley, II. w. Archer aud II W. Archer Jr.,
for defendant. John Jones VS.. The same. s me
counsel. James Mahon vs.. David Lennon d
Sons, garnishees Of John Mahou, Jr. VIM aud
John s. Young for plaintiffs, II. w. Archer and
IL. w. Archer, Dr., for defendants. BENJAMIN
Mahomet vs.. James Foard. WIN. Young for
plaintiff, Archer & VanBibber for defendant
Thomas Thornton VS.. X. g. Huston, garnishee.
VIM. Young for plaintiff Archer IL VanBibber
for defendant. A Trcadweli VS.. same. Same
counsel. Patrick Manning VS.. K. G. Huston,
garnishee. VIM. and John 5. Young for plain
Tiff, Archer Il VauBibber for defendant. John
j. Moresp VS.. same. Same COUNSEL. james
Mahon VS.. same. Same counsel j, Nelson
Demoss VS.. same. Same counsel. Patrick
Prendible VS.. John Price. Stump and II. W.
Archer for plaintiff Archer u Van Bibber for
defendant. Jas. w. Michael va. j. NJ. Simmons
Robinson for plaintiff, VIM. Young for defend
ant. Jos. N. Simmons VS. Jas. W Michael
VIM. Young for plaintiff Robinson for defend
ant Patrick Preudlble vs. X. g. Huston q Co,
two cases. II. w. Archer and Stump for plain.
tiff, Archer d VanBibber for defendants. Thos. b.
| Cook VS.. Henry A. Veischon. Robert Archer
for plaintiff. Samuel Buchanan We. VIM. BucE-
| anan. Stump for plaintiff Archer IL VanBib-
Der for defendant. Evan Deckman VS.. John G..
Mccoy. IL. w. Archer, Jr.. for plaintiff, 5. A.
| Williams for defendant. Jos. I. Yinger Va.
Albert Z. Barton. II. W. Archer, Jr, for
plaintiff, VIM. Young for defendant
The following judgments have been entered ::
Henry d. Jay VS.. b. and .. X. X. Co. i; judy.
ment by default. Lee for plaintiff, VauBibber
for defendant.
John Dubois VS.. Geo. W. and I,aac Andrews !;
repevin; agreed. Hopkins for plaintiff IL.
W. Archer, stump aud j. NJ McNabb for de-
PENDANTS.
Smith d. Wicks We. same repleyin agreed.
Williams for plaintiffs, II. W. Archer, Stump
and j. NJ McNabb for defendant.
Guggenhcimer 81 Well VS.. Jas. P. Deckman,
garnishee Of Isaac Deckman; judgment. Will
liams for plaintiffs.
Josiah Cope " Co. VS.. Thomas Gordon judy
ment confessed. Dozen for plaintiffs, Harlan "
Webster for defendant.
Dugdale Il Emmart VS.. Geo. E. and Martha
NJ. Gilbert judgment against Geo. L. Gilbert.
Harlan " Webster for plaintiffs, Gilbert for de
PENDANTS.
McGinnis II Fitzgerald VS.. Robert a. Ma.
gowen; Judgment by default. Harlan " Web
ser for plaintiffs
Robert A. knight vs. Calvin and Thos. A.
McNutt; judgment by default Gilbert for
plaintiff.
Barnes Il Archer VS. Bennett Osborn; judg.
ment by default. Dozen for plaintiffs.
Grillet u Naun VS.. d. b. Arthur; judgment.
Harlan q Webster for plaintiffs, Archer Il Van
Bibber for defendant.
Charles W. Baker VS.. Bennett Nelson and
Robert A. Mitchell. Gilbert for plaintiff
Josiah Cope Il Co. VS.. Jacob 2. Walker !;
judgment by default. Dozen for plaintiffs.
Camellla A. Mitchell, administratrix of Der.
ment by default. s. A. Williams for plaintiff
Hartford National Bank VS.. Joshua johnson !;
judgment. g. A. Williams for plaintiff, Street,
for defendant.
Jas Farnandis VS.. J. Nj. Herman; judgment
confessed. Farnands for plaintiff. stump for
Clark's Cove Guano Co. VS.. q. W. Amos a. Co. !;
judgment by default. Stump for plaintiff.
j. NJ. Frasch u Bro. VS.. Gustav Schady judy
ment by default Dozen for plaintiffs.
Jos. K. Terry vs.. Thomas w. Livezey judg-
ment by default. Lee tor plaintiff
s. A. Williams, Attorney, Va. Jos. w. Butler
and Laban Lowe Judgment by default +. r.
Williams for plaintiff.
Asa Jones VS.. Washington Barton; judgment
by default Hopkins for plaintiff.
odIllc w. Hm W. DtTlOH buuit tuITltF.
James II. Harkins vs. Charles Terry; judg.
ment by default. W. b. Harlan for plaintiff.
Thurber, Whyand Il Co. VS.. Geo. II and Geo.
n. Armstrong; judgment for Sl,24a 49, Stump
for plaintiffs.
Rankin q Kane vs.. VIM. Durham Judgment
confessed. Williams for plaintiffs.
McAfre Bros. vs.. Jas. l.. Whitaker aud Chas.
Goodwater; Judgment confessed. Stump for
plaintiffs.
On Saturday the Appeal docket was called,
the following entries being made:
To S,et Docket Barnes Il Archer, vs. Harry
Cover. Williams for appellant, Maynadier for
appellee. Hester Boone VS.. DR.. X. X. BouIdin.
Win. Young and s. Archer for appellant, Gill
bert for appellee. John Skilman VS.. Adam
appellee. Juliet 2. Hall vs.. Robert II. Carmau,
Sheriff, and Charles II. Snow Il Co. WIN.
Young for appellant.
The following cases were tried:
Hutton u Gilliland VS.. Chas. T. Scarf; jury
trial verdict for appellants for s29.S3. Harlan
and Webster for appellants, Williams for ap-
pelee.
Atlantic Dynamite Co. vs.. Holmes and Kings
ley and and e. I. Lyon claim of property |;
judgment affirmed. Williams and WIN. Young
forappellant, Hopper and Hopkins for appellees.
Similar cases in which j. Frank Jones, Henry
Carver aud Lyon and Co. were defendants were
settled by same entries.
Michael l.. HaVlldnu vs.. Everett ana Williams
Administrators; judgment affirmed with costs in
favor of appellees. Preston for appellant, Will
lams for appellees.
DR.. Chas. A. Rutledge VS.. John J. Kennedy;
judgment In favor of appellee by agreement
Rutledge for appellant, VIM. Young for appel
Ice.
The case of Joseph Jones VS.. The County
Commissioners was argued, last Friday, by Col.
fireman stump and s. A. Williams for the plain.
tiff and VIM. Young and Il. W. Archer for the
defendants. 1t was given 10 the jury Friday
afternoon. They remained out until after mid
night and on Saturday morning brought in
seated verdict, awarding the plaintiff one cent
damages.
The appeal case OF Mrs. Hester Pyle VS.. Chas.
Rigdon was tried before jury, on Monday.
MIR. Rigdon had rented a store house at Chest
nut Hill, belonging TO Mrs. Pyle, and according
to evidence, vacated it on the 22d of February,
1886, his year expiring March 22d following,
removing all his goods, his evidence showed,
bcio IL that time, and Offering the keys of the
premises to Mr.. Pyle. Evidence for the latter
was contradictory of this statement. The jury,
after remaining out a few minutes, gave ver-
diet for Mr.. Rigdon. Mcssrs. 8. A. Williams
and VIM Young appeared for Mrs. Pyle, and
Col. Herman Stump and II. w. Archer for Mr..
Rigdon.
Tuesday being Washington's Birthday, court
was not IN session.
The appeal case of L. b. Ilol oway VS.. Johns
II. Jauney began on Tuesday. WIN. Young for
appellant, Hopkins and Williams for appellee
YOUR horse is always In condition" "Why
certainly, we use Days Horse Powder all win
ter"
only good and reliable medicine should be
given to babies and young children. DIR. Bulls
baby Syrup does not cont ain any thing injurious.
Use Dir. Bulls Baltimore Pills II you want TO
feel well and lively. All druggists keep them.
- cents.
Beauties ant resist Drexrrs Bell Cologne.
announcements OF Marriages and Deaths free
Obituary Notices fUe cents per lins.l
MARRIED.
McC0Y-WANN.-O On Tuesday evening Feb