St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1887-03-20
lay OF THE Law.
Yesterdays Big Grist in the Mill of
The District Court.

The case of Martin Hanson vs.. Eugene A.
Hutchins was argued and submitted yeSter-
day.
Before Judge Rea yesterday the case of
Fl. Judge against w. H. Forbes was argued
and submitted.
Gideon B. Hall secured judgment of
1926 against John N. ADrahamson on a
mechanics lien yesterday. @t.'-Z
Emma j. Myers secured a divorce yester-
day from John G. Myers on the ground of
cruel and inhumau treatment.
A motion for a new trial in the case of Con-
way Hodsdon VS.. Ebeuezer Hodson was yes
:erday argued and submitted.
In the case of Ball s. Naylor VS.. Gates Bros.
judgment was ordered for the plaintiffs and q
mechanic lien ordered foreclosed.s
The petition for the appointment of re-
ceiver of the estate Of Ole Peterson was
stricken from the calendar yesterday.
Judgment was yesterday ordered for the
plaintiffs IN the mechanics lien case of Sax.
ton & Phillips VS.. William Hartman. 49, aer
E. F. Comstock and others are made defenaF
ants in an action brought b. Howard Truin-
bull to recover S115.69 for work done.
A motion for a change of venue in the case
of George w. Thompson VS.. William Olson ct
al. was denied yesterday by Judge Hicks.
In the matter Of the assignment of j. B .
McArdle, Judge Young made an order yester-
day allowing the account of the assignee.
III the case Oh refer w OlIOrQ against FRANK
B. Melville there was no appearance on the
part of the plaintiff and the case was stricken
off.
J. C. Oswald & Co. have begun an action
against Ernest Laechett to recover S443 95,
alleged to be the balance due on goods pur-
chased.
The divorce cases of Alvin Parker VS.
Martha E. Parker, and Joseph Aubrecht vs..
Caroline Aubrecht were yesterday continued
one week.
Judge Young made an order yesterday con-
frming the sale of the stock of J. N. Priester.
who recently made an assignment to Paul
Schmedeman, to john r. Everhard for 1886.
In the case of Sarah A. Misko VS.. Isaac A.
L. Merrill ct al, to determine the ownership
to lot 10, in block 80, of BaSsett, Moore s.
Cases addition, Judgment was Yesterday Or
dered for the defendants
The divorce case of Ransom D. Parker
against Frances Parker in which Mr.. Parker
alleged that his wife had been guilty of adult
cry with one Charles Anderson, and that she
is now pregnant with child by him, came up
in the district court yesterday, when divorce
was granted.
Julius Nelson has begun an action against
Ole H. Munseth and John G. johnson to cam
eel contract whereby he was to give the
defendants lot l, block l, Cornelps Third adj
dition, in case they would pay him 81, 495 and
build house upon the land. He alleges that
Morse & Garvey yesterday commenced suit
against e. F. Comstock ct al. to recover
81, 900 for work done under q contract which
the defendants failed to make good. The
same firm sues Mr.. Comstock and others and
the Minneapolis, Lyndale Minnetonka Rail
way company to recover $7,4S5 for work
done.
In the suit Of the state against the owners
of lots and TO- Hengler's addition. to enforce
the payment of taxes, Patrick Kennedy filed
an answer yesterday stating that he is the
pastor of st. Stephens church, located upon
the premises, and that the adjacent build
ings on the land belong to the church society
and are therefore non-taxable.
Edith Howell, rather pretty woman of %
years, secured divorce yesterday from
William Howell, on the ground of desertion
and failure to support. Mr.. and Mrs. Howell
were married at Valley City, OAK, July s.
1888, and shortly after removed to this city
On August ii, 1883. Mr.. Howell, who, by the
way, is some IS years of age, left his wife,
and since then she has seen nothing of him.
At the special term of the district court
yesterday the following cases were continued:
Minneapolis s. st. Louis Railway company VS..
Minneapolis Northern Railway company;
P. ID. Mcmillan ct al. VS.. Jacob X. Sidle ct al
Moline Plow company VS.. S. H. Soule; assign
ment of s. E. Hart 81 Co.; E. Cody vs. Clark
& De Laittre. to be heard at chambers: North
American Telegraph company VS.. Western
Union Telegraph company; Mary LIE Compile
to Annable LIE Compile; assignment of Creigh-
ton & Co.; application for the appointment
of receiver of Hattie Herbster ct al;
James Carney VS.. NJ. S. Matthews; W. b.
Clark VS.. J. 5. Gillespie ct al. Robert Black.
wood vs. Sarah A. Kimball ct al; Briggs s.
Huse VS.. A. Dinsmore; Eliza GowaI VS..
Parker, Cook & Gowan; Pond Machine Tool
company VS.. Pray Manufacturing company;
D. NJ Swain VS.. E. l., Newell