New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1887-06-23


the examination vigorously.
oUnder what did yoa receive ne %opey
Al rece we'd telegram from De Lacy asRins INC "
IN mo ws q ss sni
Wha, did you dol Al went 70 his nous, roll Of bills
9wsai S All se e: spy %e There something
yoa not Understand at that was paid On
OF the Broslway surface Company A'N0' sui
oWhat was your that timei ArnsaLo
particular understanding so far as was
SGai I'D 1l Vat At II. vi ,% isI A'A''i''"sy'
ss eT Is. n4oaG T
there was no contract entered either BY HIM or yse three
9what d ySg DC vii, a,t the n sg him
him that wanted him to my stores "ah'on'o '
ws that e would the next DAY ! he S S1%S
and told him Mr. DeIacy alh 70 iSe II TO Won back
lie says: What's that for sad; I I aIh w't or any
oSsr road ann this S"r nnaer an
ne ea y nma faSs Nave s Opportunity relieve myself
Of the stigma under which stand .,,r,,
Mr. Miller smiled but Il sckly smile RS tonsn
he didn't feel at all that ne had altogether c
himself of the stigma, and there was no answering
Then Mr. Nco led Mr. Miller to talk about the sgn1ns
OF the report the Railroad Committee OF %rn re re-
member. Mooney first asked HIN 70 s s'gn w. and tbero
fused then because he had not road " carei1i{ anu
some technical terms IN surface ps railroad Next
day August g. at the meeting OF the hoaa % Witness
my ,sod across The chamber and saws to me:
Alderman sign this ~ looked II over sa'u Io,.t care
only reaI o s Nn'f or not er reading over signed
the report and handed IL back to MIN ana nc s H., Find
must not he - thin uned, or something oi a'
Then the first thing knew the report OF 'ne ndont
Committee in order ana IL was rea nm ncrt.
ed" lie dlnt attend the carly morning ,hipc
ing OF August 80 and knew ny,orr noIn nag
OIL until he something about ~ IN oe nDt no
Tot home that evening. Mooney had neseeted 10 c"l'
him mo when he made his celebrated midnight tramp
Wr Par.ons for tbe defence examined Mr. Miller ION
DERBY Not n word did he say TO him ABOUT MS nii ~.
Standing of where tho money which DO Lscy gave him
came from no evidently thought that matter was IN
pn.;tion where he could well AFFORD To leave II aioe
Miller told him that he indicted on April 80 1885,
bnt had held no conference with the District
Attorney his assistants about MS testimony nc .au
been su6pTuaed to attend and had atten ga reuciahy
His counsel had told him that he had no help Tor lie
said that lie had coBscen,ousy favored INC Broadway
surface Railroad scheme. No conipany had ever al,
reared before the Railroad Committee win an ofer OF
81 100000 for the franchise That was gu neWspaper
talk sharps lawyers seemed well satisfied WIN tue turn
Micrs Testimony had taken ami beamcd on him good
nauredly he left the stand HIS place was ia-em ny
John A. sullivan, detective In the sud. treasury bul.
ing i'm Wallst who testified that about the end of 1854
or beginning OF 1ss, Moloney, whom he knew person,
ais. TO the building to ge Slopp Dl chanGed
for bills OF smaller denomination sullivan go, me blll
Taanged he ,oG rb n, a. s5oS Bill for Mooney
John VI. Foote. who has charge o. me tGverhmene
next witness. lie said that man came 10 me pans 10
purchase some registered bonds ne the man salu i9y
thought the circumstances suspicious; ana turning 70
the directory found that Patrick Farley iVed OF mo AT
dress given Wherefore. LIE decided That his visitor ii
been Alderman Farley Mr. fooie was preyentei ~
the arrival OF the hour for adiournmcnt from CIV
dates and particulars OF the tFhnSifuo VIII VIZ
to-day The trial Will he resumed at9;Jo n m
WHAT Is SAID or MILLER's 1Es fIMoNY.
The testimony OF eNAlderIuan Miller cOrruborating
that OF Fullgraf ana Duffy to actual acts OF bribery
wa. wholly unexpected those who have followed the
sharp trial closely II thought tia! the prosecution
had PLAYED oil the knayes In the previous trials, and
that no others OF the Indicted "boOdcrs could he IN
duced To- tell what they knew about the broadway rail
road affair Few people pretend 10 believe Aiu!cr Story
about returning the 5000 10 DE Lacy bat II i gen
orally admitted that lis evidence In this case VIII elp
hn II lie Is put trial aud II his story u not siAeh
then that he hns q good chance Of bcns acquitted
Mr. Nicol said last night that Miller bad been prom
tseI no Immunity from trial and punishment nor any
other reward advantage for his testimony ana that 10
all intcnts ana purposes it purely voluntary.
As lac stated the stand, SAID the Assistant us
Attorney, mo one from the District AVnrle! =
Office had n conference with him regarding tuc ic-i
us that II aeI called be would tell the whole TRUTH
and YOU have heard the result g.,
Mr. Nic0il regards tho testimony of l"Nh- rue 'lclA
In Robinson. -crlbner Brights Office. rs iuurh more
important than that Of Miller since 1, establishes Tue
fact that sharp aud NOlOncy ~ direct Couhuica
ton with one another AZ the time the Broadway surface
road question was hcng discussed
ENAlderuaT Miller declined 10 discuss MS reasons uI
tesifying as ne aid when he might have refused 10
answer the questions put 10 him on the ground ~ sti
advice of his counsel. who had told him that such "a
course would kc best for him under the clrchi,tcct
Mr. Sharp did not 20 home to dinler last night put
was driven In his carriage directly To Ludlow street JM
him they had dinner and soon after o'clock Mr
Sharp went 10 bed. He has slept poorly since nc 'er
10 the jail and HIS health Is said TO 3c much impaired
since the trial began The jury went Directly 70 ihe Met.
of ticIr coats nd read tho cXpurgatcd newspapers or
ulaVei chess checkers.