The Wheeling daily intelligencer. [volume] (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1865-1903, 1887-07-20
the people as to Bakers connection with
the crime, but formed no opinion. Ac.
AN INpHAcuIp JUROR,

e".e Az hNh AZ pihb huu uhu IuTulbu II
opinion. Ho was ut the Cove on the ia
Of the Inquest, but did not recollect tall
Ing to any Of the jurors. He could civ
an impartial verdict In accordance witt
tho law and the evidence. He had n,
conscientious scruples against capital pun
Being s.examined by Mr.. Hutchin
eon he said: have known the prisoner
from childhood; saw him several time
since last May while no WAS in jsil, bp
sent no ono else TO Bee him. Ibid mo-
say to him, "Cheer up; oil viii soon b,
right" did notsay to him, "Be content
all will be WE'LL" l have no, talked viii
counsel about the case and have given nf
Information to council or friends OF the
prisoner; have taken no active part in hia
iavor. My wife called a. the Jail 10 set
him. DO not remember saying, Baker
cheer up; oil will come out right" did
not tell Baker at the jail would do ali /
conld Tor him. ! have not tried to Gnd
out what the witnesses in the case would
testify. MRS. o. T'I95i - -
Mr.. Jester was challenged by tho prose
cution, but their objection was overruled,
and he was seated. Jas
Robert Wilson, Of New Cumberland, was
accepted without challenge.
Isaac Huff had an opinion NO strony II
would take considerable evidence 10
change 1t. 5rn"7.Ta,sYI
"You may stand aside"
John Lnduf had been studying the
prisoners phyalognomy, and to a certain
extent bad formed an opinion thereirom,
out could give him a fair trial. lie was
excused. ~ 4 u
GOOD DEAL OF EVIDENCE.
John Hutaon thought lit ought to take
a good deal OF evidence TO hang man."
which did not in the opinion OF the court
disqualify him, and he was seated.
James Wright, IT,, was excused because
he Ia q witness far the State. :,
William Anderson was challenged BY the
defense and their obi scsion sustained.
David Carothers, OF Butler District, had
expressed an opinion formed BY newspa.
perand common reports, but could decide
the case solely upon tho evidence. He
was cross examined by Mr.. Cook and said
be was at the Cove the day OF the INQUEST
but heard none OF the evidence, at will
~ ,euioNe tne oplnloA
: nave tolmsd. challenged BY the de.
tense. oha1iehge oVefruled anu juror &C.
ceP1eu.
neuly baiton. Of roe district, fifteen
alles from the Cove-have no bias, and
Gave iolmeo ana expresaed no opinion.
Can give an impartial trial. Not opposed
to punishment by death. Gross exsmin.
ed by Cook. whats your religion ~
aletnoa!st. accepted. ESQ.
A4llea onambera, who is related in
some way 70 Inc Mc"ha family, was chal-
lenRed and excused.
Az inns luncture the court, having ex..
a anI twenty OF the Jurors summoned
ana accepted len Of them, took recess
iof olnner.
55i LEFT OFF FOR CAUSE,
Upon reassemhl;no in Tho oto.,o.,
the examination WAY cn M .uv aal'efnoon'
Peter A. prob ha1 ~ n uosei,
having e1nresssd an ~ te en;miaa q
thought he conld im,ar;;o,,v p ~. ~. anu
oused. In answer to nrar;a. ~ 10y NV. .ue ~
tense. he esid he was a praobr,o.; sro 1
response Ia a ouaat;on hr ~ u,,.nh;.. -
he said he married the n;eca If Me nnnn
hon, Of cnpnsal for AZ ,otona. Do M
Hutchinson misunderstood . h;n, aa .;
asked - 1890 t 1'i'' a eita
7"You ara b;a nanbaw ~ Il .lss55. K,
"No. piI: NV vita Il RI
."That is. Won married b;a n;ecaqn
"Yes. air i -. .l 4t' A.e 20
NE Pnob ea;s M TIL,
panel who was excused in the morn;nu in
conversation with him, passed sone ra.