The Cambria freeman. [volume] (Ebensburg, Pa.) 1867-1938, 1887-09-16
Court Oceedfngs.

week after the FREEMAN had gone 10 press.
Com'th vs.. Edward BIngis- Pointing
frearm. Not true bill and the prosecu-
trix. Mrs Bingle, TO pay the costs
Com'th VS.. John Thomo. Assault and
battery. Not 3 true bill and the prosecutor,
Joseph Beck, to pay the costs
Com'th VS.. William Biffinger. Receiving
stolen goods. Jury find defendant guilty.
Com'th vs.. George Rich. Receiving
stolen goods. Jury find defendant not
guilty.
Comth vs.. Joseph Hughes. Assault and
battery. Jury find defendant to be irsane.
Comth VS.. Mary z. Boyle. Larceny.
Defendant plead guilty. Sentenced to un-
dergo an Imprisonment In county Jail for
80 days.
Comth vs.. Barney Lundy. Larceny.
Defendant Plead guilty. Sentenced to un-
dergo an Imprisonment In the Western Pen
itentiary for a term OF two years
The Grand Jury on Thursday reported
that they had visited the Poor House and
found the building In good repair, bedrooms
neat and clean. the barn, outhouses, and
fences In good condition. aud the manage
meDt ommendabIe. They also visited the
Jail, and reported that they found 1t In FAIR
condition. The Grsnd Jury was then dis
charged, with the thanks of the Court
Com 'th VS.. Charles Stadmiller. Larceny.
Jury find defendant not guilty.
Com'th VS.. B. =. Burkhart. Larceny.
Jury find defendant not guilty.
! Com'tn VS.. Joseph Marker. Enticin9 q
female child. under the age Of sixteen, from
her home for the purpose of marrying her
| nafandant
sentenced to uuderao en- imprisonment ID
the Western Henitentisry for one year.
| Com'th VS.. Harry Kane. Assault and
battery Jury found defendant guilty
Sentenced to pay a nne of go and costs oi
prosecution.
Com'ih vs.. Samuel Kelly. Larceny.
Defendant plead guilty.
Com'th VS.. George Taylor. Larceny.
Defendant plead guilty. Sentenced tc
thirty days In jail.
Com'tn VS.. Edward BiHgle. Assault and
battery. Jury find defendant guilty. Sen
tenced to payla hne OF Is and costs
Com'th vs.. Michael Boylan. Makins
threats. Defendant discharged on his ON
recogniZapce.
In the cases OF the Com'th vs.. John W
Wonders EmbezbIement- The Court d.
rected nolIe proseq,ii to be entered and th'
defendant discharged
Com'th vs.. James l. Mitchell, John Nc
Govern and Peter McGovern. Forcibl
entry and de!ainer. Jury found defendant
not guilty. but that they pay the costs
SECOND WEEK.
AugustIu Crayer VS.. John A Blair. Ex
ecutor OF Dennis Blswley. decd. Feignet
Issue. Jury find for the defendant excep
the beds and bedding.
Martha Mock VS.. L 5. Grambling. Fei2n
ed Issue. Discontinued.
BIauch & Stutzman vs.. Baltimore & Oil
R. Z. Co. Appeal. Continued.
John z StrayeI VS.. ID. \. Luther, Sheriff
Trespass de bonis aspOrtatis. Jury find 70
defendant.
Laing & Davidson vs. Emanuel james
Appeal. Jury find for the the defendant
! Stephen Stuizman, assignee of III. w
Keim We. Washington Stonebraker Judg
ment opened JDry find for plaintiff th
sum Of S4l676.
adam Bowers VS. Samuel Kelly. Cas-
continued.
N. Krause vs.. George Rex Scire Facia:
CONTINUED.
Mary Bendon vs.. Patrick Burns. Eject
ment Defendants confess judgment 70
* Of the land described In the writ.
Frederick Snyder vs.. William Cole. Al
tachment Execution. Jury find for tn
defendant Motion for new trial
Peter Blouah vs. Lydia Levingstons
SANDER. Settled.
John A. Storm VS.. Philip Cooper. Appeal
Settled.
Elliott Tallman vs. Dwelling House In
surance Co. Continued.
John Dibert vs. Dennis Bradley ct 8
Continued
Anthony Mccoy vs.. James G. Bradley G
ux- Appeal. Continued.
Ellen Gillespie vs.. John r. McCloske
and Catbarine McCioskey. Quare clausaI
fregir. Jury find for plaintiff the sum {
$50. Motion for a new trial.
Frederick Bland vs.. William Strickland
Appeal. Settled.
John Tegler VS.. John McKenns. Appea
Continued.
Samuel Reed vs.. Kittanning Irsuranc
Co. Assumpsit. Jury find for plaintiff II
sum OF 500, one half payable In thrs
months and the other half in six months.
James Goff vs. Robert Watson. Judl
ment opened. Continued.
John Kelly and Susan Kelly vs.. VILLA
ID. Schmittle. EiectmeDt. Jury find Il
plaintiffs the land described In the writ.