The Jackson standard. [volume] (Jackson C.H., Ohio) 1847-1888, 1887-03-03
Court of Common Pleas.

Court of Common Pleas.
REPORT OF GRAND JURY.
T th9 sd lanes TipP Judge of the conrt
The Grand Jury of the Court of Common Pleas
said county, of the February Term 1887 beg leave
report that they have been in session three days.
herewith return to the Court the indictments pre-
sented by said jury: We have carefully examine
into all such matters have legitimatey ou
notice, having examined seventy-four witness
es, covering II and presented II bills and ignore
cases considered by The business has been trans
acted in as expeditions manner possible.
During our session we have visited the County ia
and made complete examination thereof and fin
that the rules prescribed by the Court for the car
thereof and for the government of its inmates hav
been carried out and properly enforced. We foun
confined in jail nine persons charged with crimes
| follows: One murder, one manning, one assault an
battery, fornicaton, two adultery, two perjury
and one insane but harmless, and not kept in clos
confinement. Respectfully submitted,
WILLIAM J. CALLAHAN, Foreman.
February 23, 1887.
INDICTMENTS.
The following the indictments presented by saiC
jury:
The State ofohio VS.. John W. Hartley. Perjury.
Same Adultery.
Same VS.. George Eisnaugle. Adultery.
| Same Lucinda johnson. Fornication.
| Same Frank Giblin. Cutting with intent ts
| wound.
Same vs. Frank McClain. Cutting with intent tc
wound.
Same VS.. Thomas Richards. Carrying concealed
| weapons
Same James Sherick jr. Petit larceny.
Same VS.. Albert Gilmore. Petit larceny.
Same VS.. Philip Schroeder. Selling Intoxicating
liquor to minor.
Same VS.. same. Selling intoxicating lquar on a
Sunday.
Robert Harper ir. VS.. Sarah W.
Hull Settled at plaintiffs costs, for
which execution is awarded.
Nancy Braddock VS.. John Hoffman.
Continued for service.
Jane V. Humphries VS.. William
Humphries Divorce. Cause dismissed
on motion Of plaintiff and execution
awarded for COSTS
H. S. Bundy VS.. Moses Simmons.
Judgment for plaintiff for S243.O9.
Elizabeth Dobbins VS.. William Dob
bins. Divorce On motion of plaintiff
cause dismissed at plaintiffs costs.
Lucy J. Cobb VS. Jno. C. H. Cobb
ct al. Continued under former order
of sale.
Ohio VS.. Lou Ball. Indictment for
keeping house Of i'll fame. Defendant
arraigned. Plea not guilty. Set for
March Z, 1887.
Ohio VS.. James Sherrick Indict-
ment for petit larceny. Plea guilty.
Defendant ordered to be imprisoned in
county Jail for period of five days and
pay fine Of $40 and costs of prosecu-
tion, and stand committed until fine
and costs are paid or secured.
Ohio VS.. Albert Gilmore. Indictment
for petit larceny. Plea guilty. Fined
S. and costs and stand committed
until paid.
Ohio VS.. Geo. Eisnaugle Indictment
for adultery. Plea not guilty. Set
for March s, 1887.
Mark Sternberger vs. The Western
Railway Construction Co. Judgment
for plaintiff.
The State of Ohio VS.. Samuel Fraley.
Venire Facias returned by Sheriff
Douglas R. Griffin, Ex'r &c., VS.. I.
H, Mccormick. Settled and costs
paid
Douglas R. Griffin VS.. I. Fl. McCor-
mick ct al. Settled and costs paid
Alice Scott VS. Henry Scott
Divorce Decree of divorce granted.
State of Ohio VS.. Samuel Fraley.
Indictment for murder in first degree.
Filed precipe for an Alias Venire Fa-
cias for four jurors in above styled
cause.
Ohio VS. Frank McLain Indictment
for cutting. Defendant arraigned
Plea not guilty. Set for March 9, 1887.
Ohio VS.. Frank Giblin. Indictment |
for cutting with intent to wound
Defendant arraigned. Plea not guilty
Set for March 10, 1887.
Sophia McKinniss VS.. Andrew B.
Peters. Sale confirmed.
J. W. Laird ct al VS.. James S. Ba-
ker Injunction heretofore granted
made perpetual.
HuIda Riegel VS. Thos E. Riegel,
Divorce granted, and custody, control,
care and education Of children until
further ordered
Albert W. Vorheesilvs. Edward W.
ct al. Judgment by default
against def't Edward W. Mitchell for
S133. so, with interest at s per cent.
Ohio VS.. John w. Hartley. Perjury
Plea not guilty. Set for March II.
Same VS.. Same. Adultery. Plea not
guilty. Set for March II.
Sarah Richardson VS.. Daniel FL.
Martin. Bastardy. Settled by the
parties.
Azariah C. Arthur VS.. John W. Mar
tin and Minerva Martin Decree for
RI 900 IA and fOrocloSure of mort OaUa !