Los Angeles daily herald., 1887-01-18
People VS.. II. NJ. Anderson.
Estate of Benedict.
HrH !H~OIN, j 4,

City of Los Angeles VS.. Mascarel-
Dismissed.
In re Congregational Church at West
minster-Prayer to mortg gage real estate
granted.
S.P. R. R. VS.. Coble-Passed for, the
session.
Leffingwell VS.. McArthur-Thirty days
additional for statement On motion for a
new triil.
Dominguez VS.. Mascotti--Thirty days
additional for statement on motion for
new trial.
Kanaen VS.. city OF Los Angeles
Cross complaint stricken out.
McNeal VS.. McNeal-Publicatio of
summons ordered in Weekly HERALD.
Soto vs.. Brdger-A. w. Hutton ap-
pointed guardian ad litem for minor
defendants.
Greenwalt VS.. Acknowledgment for
plaintiff,
Hancock VS.. Plummer--Transferred
to Department One owing to disqualifi-
cation of Judge of Department Two.
City of Los Angeles VS.. d. Boteller--
Set for February l4th.
Eichbaum VS.. Eichbaum--Deoree of
divorce in favor of Eva A. Eichbaum.
Lombard VS.. Lombard--Ordered that
.$25 of alimony be paid.
Siegel vs. His Creditors-Passed to
January 3lst.
TERM TRIAL CALENDAR.
The following cases will be tried with.
out jury:
Mulock VS.. Cooper, January 26.
Stratton VS.. Miller, January &C.
Joyce vs.. Miller, January 26
Maybery VS.. Leslie, March l.
Alhambra Addition Water Co. VS..
Maybery, March Is.
Guyer VS.. Bosqui, March 2.
Merrill Lodge VS.. Ellsworth, January
.27.
Merrill Lodge VS.. Ellsworth ct al, Jam
uary 27.
CarrilIo ct al. VS.. Mora ct al, April l..
Hickman vs.. Phelan, March %.
Mcfarland VS.. Spencer, March %.
Moreno VS.. Sentous, March %.
Fraser VS.. O'Reilly, March "a.
Wilson vs. Walker, February l.
Bragg VS.. Packard, January %.
Sepulve6a VS.. Bough ct al, March Is.
Bernard. VS.. Wilson, January 81.
Rowan VS.. City, February 2.
Smith, executor, vs.. Lyon ct al, Jan.
uary 2S.
Ryan VS.. O'Reilly, March "a.
Cooley VS.. Graham, January 80.
Leonis VS.. Leffingweil, February 3.
Barclay VS.. Medlin, March s.
Niles VS.. Santa Cruz. April l.
Roussinot VS.. Rebout, March 3.
Maclay VS.. Gard, Sheriff, February 4 .
O'Reilly VS.. Hans ct al, March "a.
Rains VS.. Fudickar, February s.
Dunnigan vs.. Montana, February 8.
McLennan VS.. Mcdowell, February
10.
Panchou vs. Panchon, February H..
Callighan VS.. Phillips et al, March
.25.
Fogelmann VS.. Shively, February "a
Newman vs.. Hewes, February Is.
Drown VS.. Pico, February %.
Lugo VS.. Briswalter, March 4.
Sentous VS.. Ellis, February 4.
Hammel vs.. Pfnniger, February s.
Kaneer VS. City of Los Angeles, April |.
Sepulveda VS. Maxwell, March s.
The following are jury cases:
Anderson VS. City Railroad Co mpapy
March 30.
Allen VS. Haley, March 81.
Los Angeles Gas Company VS. valla
er al, March 8.
Brown VS. Burke, March 4.
Wright VS. Long Beach Land and Wa.
ter Company, February 25.
Dawson ct al VS. Gardner, March 10.
Hall ct al VS. Perret ct al, February Is.
Weekly VS. Central Street Railroad
Company, March II.
Gassen vs. Californis Street Railroad
Company, February l6.
Griswold VS. California Street Railroad
Company, February Is.
Baldwin VS. California Street Railroad
Company, February l6.
Burlingame VS. California Street Rail-
road Company, February l6.
Feckwirth VS. California Street Rail.
road Company, February l6.
Douler VS. Parsons, February II.
Eddy VS. Central Street Railroad
Company, March 30.
The following cases were referred to
the County Commissioner:
Brown VS. Brown, Young VS. Reese,
Foster VS. Foster, Salgado VS. Salgado,
Burr VS. Burr, Galman VS. Gilman.