The Hope pioneer., 1887-11-18
OFFICIAL
Proceedings OF the Board Of County
Canvassers.

H - AoASAD
Proceedings OF the Board of County
Canvassers.
SHERBRooKE, D. T., November II, 1887.
Board of canvassers met on call of the coun-
ty auditor.
Present.. c. Goplerud, S. H. Nelson, John
L. Wilcox and G. G. Huntley.
On motion, L. c. Goplerud was chosen chair
man and G. G. Huntley appointed clerk.
On motion the board proceeded to canvass
the returns of the election held November 8.
Returns from precinct No. l, NeWburgh,
were taken up and found in proper form.
Number of votes cast, "a; for division, s.;
against division, 20.
For the sale, l; against the sale, 80.
For cOmmissiOner-Lewls Thompson, 80; l..
9. Goplerud, l.
Returns from precinct No. were in proper
| form.
Number Of votes cast, 10; against division,
49,; for the sale, 5; against the sale, II.
Returns from precinct No. 8, town las,
range ST, were rejected, because it does not ap-
pear that the oath was administered to the
| judges and clerks.
Returns from precinct No. 4, town 14S, range
| 81, were in proper form.
| Number Of votes cast, s; for division, 8;
against the sale, s.
| Returns from precinct No. 5, town 147, range
| 81, were in proper form.
Number OF votes cast, %; against division,
IT. for division, +; against the sale, 13; for the
| sale, 10.
Returns from precinct No. 6, town 147, range
Sc, were rejected, because of Noncompliance
with election law, as follows: said election
board was not full, and it does not appear that
the oath was administered to Hans Gilbertson
and james Cochrane, judges, and David E.
Tufts, clerk, and that Joseph 81. Wright, one
of the clerks Of said board, was not legal
voter.
Returns from precinct No. Z, Golden Lake,
were found in proper form.
Number Of votes cast, z; against the sale, s.
for the sale, 2; against division, z.
The returns from precinct No. 8, town Of
Enger, were found to he in proper form.
Number of votes cast, so; against division,
50; against the sale so.
For commissioner-Lewis Thompson, 81; F.
G. Enger, 19.
Returns from precinct No. 9, Primrose, were
in proper form.
Number of votos cast, 21; against division,
II; for division, S; against the sale, II; for the
sale, 9.
For commissioner-E. o. Wallen, 81.
The returns from precinct No. 10, Sherbroohe,
were in proper form.
Number Of votes cast II; against division,
9; for division, 8; against the sale, 4; for the
sale, 13.
The returns from precinct No. II, Pickert,
were rejected, on the ground that the oath
does not appear to have been administered to
Leonard Verwest, one of the judges.
The returns from precinct No. 12, town 146,
range 81, were found to be in proper form.
Number of votes Cast 21; against division,
l5 for division, 6; against the sale, II; for the
| sale, 4.
The returns from precinct No. Is, Riverside,
were in proper form.
Number Of votes cast 9; against division, 9;
against the sale, 6; for the sale, 8.
The returns from precinct No. IA were in
proper form.
Number Of votes cast 6; for division 6;
against the sale, 4; for the sale, 2.
The returns from precinct No. Is, town 145,
range 55, were in proper form.
Number Of votes cast, S; against division, 8;
for division, 2; against the sale, 2; for the
sale, 8.
The returns from precinct No. 16, Glendale,
were in proper form.
Number of votes cast 10; against division,
10; for division, g. against the sale, Is; for the
sale, 4.
For commissioner-E. O.. Wallen, s; Lewis
Thompson, IA.
The returns from precinct No. II, Broad.
lawn, were in proper form.
Number of votes cast 16; against division, O.
for division, 7; against the sale 16
The returns from precinct No. 18, Colgate
were in proper form.
Number of votes cast IL; against division
II; for division, 1: against the sale, 4; for the
sale, 8.
The returns from precinct No. 10, Hope
were in proper form.
Number of votes cast, 70; against division
II; for division, IS; against the sale, 4; for til,
sale, 81.
The returns from precinct No. 20, Willow
Lake, were rejected, for the reason that thu
board consisted Of but two judges and on.
clerk, and that 1t does not appear that eithel
of the judges were sworn.
| REHABILITATION
Total vote OF the county. ty................. 49,
Against division. on................,.,.,2 2l2
| IOI ulflslOu. 1L6
Majority against division. .......... 81
Majority against the sale. e.......... s:
For Commissioner
| Il. y. Wallen. NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS.. x
Lewis Thompson. Observation-Disclosures. s.
]. G. Goplerud.
1 f. ". GuSoI. .................... Ii
G. G. HUNTLEY, Clerk.
DR.. Hurd, O prominent druggist at FaulktoD.