Mineral Point tribune. (Mineral Point, Wis.) 1869-1938, 1887-01-20

cult court, have had the same under considera.
ton. and beg leave TO report as follows;
| First. That We have carefully gone through
the report OF the district attorney, and find that
during the year 1886 there has been received by
him from all sources, the sum OF 81 OF, and that
said cum Of s39o.U has been duly paid over 10 the
county treasurer, as appears from the treasurer E
books.
Second. The register reported no receipts or
disbursements during the year 1856
third. That upon a careful examination OF the
record OF certificates issued by the clerk OF the
crcnt court during the March and October terms
OF the said court for the year $3.50, amount 10 the
sum OF sl,SsS.isi that the money in his hands
uncalled for, up to date, subject TO the order OF
said court is STls.s0. That We have examined his
books and receipts, and find them correct In every
particular, and would recommend the adoption OF
this report and that the same be placed on lille.
And your conn ittee would farther report that
j. l.. Leonard the former clerk OF said court, had
In his hands at the expiration OF his term, the
sum OF 81, 1854 which was paid to him by virtue
OF his Office and that be ONLY paid to his successor
81 100 "a, which left in his hands the sum OF $50,
which i was mis- duty to pay TO his successor
We therefore recommend that the district at
torney be instructed to collect the said balance
from said j l., Leonard and his bondsmcn, and
that he is authorized to take such steps by suit or
otherwise, ss shal De necessary to collect said
balance, JAMES W SMITH,
W c. hEFFaRT,
KEARToN COATES,
Committee
On motion of Mr.. Rewey, the report
was adopted
The following is the report of j. /.
Smoker, late district attorney, as sub
mitted TO the board at the November
session and referred to said committee:
Account of j. P. Smoker, district ATTORNEY OF
Iowa county, showing the money received by
him during the preceding year, by virtue OF his
office
Received from dert in State VS.. Edward
Boo and Gilbert o. Dahl, fnes........,...S III %
Received in same, costs. ,,.'-'''.'''' o. %
By paid sheriff fees in same case. s. g q =
iustice'" JIM Dale , 6s
s 50 b5
In state VS.. Joseph Kotte, received from
d.i't per 5. W, Reese, fne .............,S 10 W
Received In same case, COSTS .-...+''''''' o. 70
~ Maid sheriff foe. IN same case ~ II 81
=" II. IL Arthur j. p. fees ............ 10
NJ j. Tappins fees. ........,.,... . 90
Witness ises...... ...,'...'..'''. ~ %
s57Os
Received from Philip Dowd, as per the
direction of q majority Of the county
board in full settlement OF the claim OF
the county on sheriff 70 certificate OF saie,
issued TO the county In 1864, In an action
Do osr1, ct ' al DEFENDANTS ''.'...., sae4 90
Received from L. Duwd Ia thu case OF !.
Dowd against the county TO set ASIDE
ea car '-'''"0''|' 80 ..'.','.a... 22 90
By paid n, j. Tappins, clerks fees in said
RsIsnce " II 90
s 306 80
Received from dert in State vs. Michael
Doyle, costs. ......... ...''..'I, 20 - %
ne ps ecev eo.ts u'''" i"n c " Ie so
Received from defendant State VS. Michael
Doyle, costs .......''''''''' 20 %
1890 II
Or.
pE u, Easn pau 0eo aui''n .o $3.50 II
STATE OF WISCONSIN,