Evening capital. (Annapolis, Md.) 1884-1910, 1887-06-28
ANNAPOLIS, MD. TUESDAY EVENING, JUNE 2s, 1887.
Tl4e NEWSPAPERS OF FRANCE.
The Opinions of the Two Mr.. Pnlitzers.
Decidedly Different Ideas.

The Opinions of the Two Mr.. Pnlitzers.
Decidedly Different Ideas.
/ was in AN English tailor shop the other
morning and the proprietor, as n crowning
argument in favor of his sartorial pro-
ductions, produced pair of trousers "for
Mr.. Pulitzer The size of the trousers
attracted my attention, and a little inves-
tigation led To the interesting discovery
that there were two Mr.. Pulitzers in
Paris, and that while Mr. Joseph Pulitzer
has been living in state at the Hotel Bris-
tol with his fine apartment, his courier,
etc, Mr.. Albert Pulitzer, OF The New
York Morning Journal, has also been liv-
ing in state, though more quietly, at the
Grand Hotel, he too having his fine apart
ment and his courier, which all goes to
show: First, that is great thing TO have
large circulation;" and second, that the
Paris correspondent of The Morning Jour
nal does not write the society notes in The
Galignani's Messenger
The opinions of these two eminent jour
nalists on the newspapers of France are
of course most interesting. Mr.. Joseph
Pulitzer spoke as follows on the subject:
''You want my opinion on French news
papers, Wen, l can give it to You very
quickly. ] think it is simply disgraceful
the kind of thing which they produce
here They are newspapers in name, but
newspapers with the news left out. They
print neither home news nor foreign news,
in fact they print nothing but stories and
| essays. They have no enterprise. Why
this late disaster to the Champagne at
| Havre was hardly noticed by them.
| had to get the details from the scanty
| little English papers pointing to the
Galignani and the Morning News. Now
an American newspaper which understood
| its business would have had man on the
| spot by the very first train to interview
the officers, the captain and the pas
sengers, to get photographs of the scene,
| etc. and to send off q complete account
by telegraph, regardless of expense. No,
| sir don't think much of French news
papers, and, by the way, / don't think
much more of their English rivals"
Mr.. Albert Pulitzer has decidedly diff
ferent ideas on the same question, 81
know that it is the fashion, he said, ''to
| condemn French journals on the ground
| that they are deficient in what we call
| news OF course il is evident that in
this respect they are a long way behind us;
| but attribute il not to any lack of enter
| prise on the part of editors and proprie-
| tors-far from it-but to the fact that
| they recognize that the general demand is
for something quite different People in
! France have not got that terrible thirst for
| news which consumes us at home; they
| are not at all in hurry to know about
accidents and crimes before it is neces-
sary, and even then they don't want a
| great mass of sickening details. In many
ways their tastes are more elevated than
ours. For example, The Figaro will PRINT
two columns on a new play by Alexandra
Dumas, and will employ one of the most
distinguished literary men in the country
to write the criticism. There is another
! great differences; in France all the great
writer's contribute to the newspapers, and
these men are paid as much as $4,000 L
| Sf2, 600 year. The result is that first
class French newspaper becomes really q
vehicle for the transmission Of the highest
order of literary, scientific and artistic
thought, and certainly that is very mucf
more than we can say of our American
papers, even the best of them. "-Pari'
Cor. Philadelphia Times.