The Lake Charles echo. [volume] (Lake Charles, Parish of Calcasieu, La.) 1876-1898, 1887-11-04

ali rsaolniions shall DO rofsrrad without Do
Sir Wiosiiffe-Doss this mean thst three
are to come from the molsner5 aid8 and three
from the Hinholla aidsf
A Menlher--k Keep chose names ont.
Mr. Wi6kii8G wanted 30 know how % was 20
be decided from which side the committee
n. kdsa6s suggested that It be decided
thus. Let one side be those wko atterii3a q
tie naurHH on the third hnqr OF t1Itne I'lld
Ha1and the other side these WHO helu Z
Caucus az no. % St. Charles street,
MI Wi6iS{fle--NEry well. Nhen 5uElEest
That the man who did not attend either caU-
Gus be appointed IS tho chairman, II We ara
going to aauut a gag law.
In. Ciniii6tto-i attended neith9raaGGug
MIR WiakiifIe wanted v know II the clinl-
nitfee would report all reeolut1nns hAa&,
whether acted on or not. .5i. -
The chair answered IN The Affirmative, ana
\ explained that The object was % nave 81
! Tss,ilntl0Hs no to the Cufafnttsset a7Ia wren
/ retnTnsd they eould be voted on ~ ms gen
IN Wisklifie made n lengthy argument
| and R1EEested that one be appoinaed frCiEa
! The McEneFy side, Nichols sltia and 0toncstre
4 'Yoioa---And the Cunningham Biila also,
II m = WietiiSs suggested that three COME
from one side Of the house or thEa1 f7ttn the
members thai attended the GEuneEAla hsA
5TsiFe Dsvey pail that Ehis was snun-
ipuEl pn0cee3illy and for the llJEIlsls OF mis-
I lead5uE algZ1bsrs 81 Sal5 o1lL.ilils,te2 Al
| FriEa IszREg olNluss3 tlsAt IN has th9 Ili,ai
I 30 debate Won A2Ne O lnn99rls9 70 Ntssta
JisEll my resolution, theggso1e stF3 Us nc
Fnt 60 DEBATE Hzaz Iss1li5taJzl from tlit sec
mi zyhiah I stand We appeal tpT fairness.
3 Ii &hR chA4gHI tDa-rou1G Was told bRat tAeHe
vssa b9E auderR chin !"
Mr- ADAMS explained the meaning OF the
Fz7{isS liavvy-ghen comes in the question
4 sF 9ls5 reference 30 the committee. II the
Z r1ra1uitsee does not bring eagk a nesolullgil,
and q Is raliIf1Cd, and then Is ~ SHUT he
Z 7T7FTsst,1 ti4at the resolution be ChHnEetl,
Nj DArhsdnle--i came here pledged 10
I neither candidate, to tFg- il possible 80 ger
a fair nsal IN th9 whole matter,
He took the position tnat the committee
hal7 no rlEkI tl pass resolutions and CT'fn-
cinfn PRINCIPLES fer t3e UemorrAf3c party
and that whom a time and place to5 holdipS
the convention Is uG0d, the powers OF tile
committee arc GNiIa asBadr and the commit tee
has no power 50 pass Eesolatlons hEInG t1e
policy Of INC party and he moved TO lay the
T6S Juf7ii0n to table was rlylt, and en- s viva
woca vote ba3nE taken the char was unable
to decide and q rising vote was asked Ao5
Just after those t9EoTlng the moilon were
requested u stand up. Mr.. Adams advanced
from his seat TO the middle Q! the room, GlIG,
pointing his finger Mt Col Z. q. hachaile'
who had been seated amongst the delegates,
asked. 'EBGhsrlt, Bg what authority 90 you
rise and vote on this tiUOT ?.
Col. 2auhariu, his face flushing up at the
time, said Il vote with this side OF the
house
10 tha Chair-Is Col Zaohsrie member
Of this body
The Chair-No, SIT: the secretary has not
got bis ugmu Oh the List. daughter,
The roll was called and the committee re-
fused 90 table the resolution.
Col Sparks ashctl permission tn amend bis
resolution in order 10 have the committee
appointed by the chair. The amendment
prevailed and the resolution was adopted.
or Patton, or Jefiries, or A 7ery or any one
10 suggest names for appointment.
The committee appointed was Dc follows;
Sparks BruRle, Adams, Conner, Jehrles,
Mealey and Foster.
~ 40 a rncess wne tal,en until S p. u.