Telegram-herald., 1887-08-05

tempting - force somefhing on - Ehlch
yoo op1ld aot 10 in aly other va, flT yoa
cannot fegr41e stfeeE sit10ut 4 maI aI3risf
H92taxs faEorS ~ A street Fsiros1
tnfsush these streets segid aepreeisls prop
srty fHty per cent. lE woald Recess ATE
tas = ~asning u the street TIE destroying
% Eos beautiful laEas an1 SHADE tFeSs.
this 5 no tine ~ discuss IAs merits q a.
or'ilaance. fAs street rsiiso4G ps1g
hold thai LhsF hase Tlsbk % proceed ~ita-
SIT u. ist tns esz<es - aAzi sppsat sst5ls
tLAt. sEa n1< - hY@x af either sinzls
Or double treez. 1se azzltsf u touois
traek Was arxsr er141aed uDtii sftef tne
signing n Is hEsk k<@t.en. aaa ss we're
not aware thai tbey lad a ighs % az
double graek Il they desired %. 4hs peo-
pie On cur streets represent the peepis a.
vsil IS those sho favor the road GRAND
hspltz is tae lsst place where riiu<s shSesd
be maas about ricn men and blue blood.
for % z0i1s back fe~ wears Il s0uia Dc
found that nearly a. Of them worked with
their hands"
Ereemao Godfrey said 4 Didn't expect
70 say anything tonight ! dOu't I've On
Jefferson ave, state or Chesry-st.. bat %
i've on Fulton-st. l an in favor OF the Old
company building that line. bat not on
that Old ordinance. / thank Judge Bur
hngame for that decision aad / thank tie
old company 70 tske care Of the street oat-
side their tracks as they should DO, not
saddle the expense on the property owners.
bV the passage OF some ordinance which
they wormed through. | say grant them
al ordinance, restrict them. aud II they
Won Laccept il, grant the sanae ordinance 70
some other com pany who vii. DOn't . cater 10
the ideas Of the company but 10 ths people.
G. ". Colt advocated the granting OF the
~. h. Ia
manded il. lie undertook TO niisiead the
people into belief that street railway
trAyeEsed Enclld-ave., IN Cleveland, by
ornlttlng unlntentiOnally perhaps TO say
that the road did not reach that thorough
fare until about mile and halt from the
city and beyond the majority OF elegant
residences
5. Z. Svartz advocated the side Of the
railway company as il would prove ad-
vaatageous 10 the poorer classes.
j. g. More discussed the legal aspect OF
the case and strongly opposed the giving
up OF the principal drive IN
the city 10 railroad and
the consequnt injury 10 property
along the line. Hs referred 10 the COM
pany's being in sympathy With the people
as twaddle, and said il was a different po-
sition than they held when the people on
Bridge-st. and the hill petitioned for a
illlc tucEc.
Mr. Rood again rose 10 speak al 1880,
and a large portion Of the lobby took
+. W. Mead favored the building Of the
road if IL wopld drive from the street the
drunken travel.
Henry Spring was decidedly in favor of
the road He thought no injury would be
done 10 The trees and be would give up
part OF his lawn willingly. j. ID. Utley
favored double track road not single
one, ditto 4. b. Mead.
A remonstrance against the granting of
the franchise to the street railway company,
10 occupy Jeilerson-ave.. State and Cherry
sts, was presented by Mr. Uhl, signed BY
property representing a feet frontage as in
dicated. Joseph II. Wonderly 90; ThOs ~
Peck 6S; Geo. W. MunSon 10; T. Stewart
White 40; Mrs. II. 5. Smith l16: +. d.
Bradield 5S: A. 4. Worden ST. ". S. Gum
80. A. NJ. Godfrey l07l; Eliza Scribner 69
Z. c. Luce 800, G. Luce 40; A Luton 40;
\. l. Avery los: w 5. Howard 70. estate
of ID. ID. Hughes -; VIM. Haldane 75; Chas.
Shepard 10. Chas. II. Perkins 81, John Pat
ton, Jr.. loo. Estate of Robert w Morris
600. w. b. Ledyard 305. Oliver Bleak ST.
Francis Lilly 90. ID. A. Blodgett 126, Peter
J. Prescke 80, c. A. Rice 81, Mrs. s B. jerks
so, L. G.. Dunton ls2, Geo. =. Dunton 66,
Mrs. J. Houseman 80, Geo. w. Brandt 64
Frank NJ. Sanderson IS. 4. J. Bovine 142l,
ID. F.. Stearns 75, J. L. Darragh leo; total,
1905 feet.
At l0.45 D. m. the meeting adjourned.
The Aldermen of the Fourth and Fifth
wards met in the City Clerks Office last
evening surrounded by some thirty prop
erty owners favorable to and opposed to the
n-ouoaed Tarrv Rovntor i orf-sf lpa Pc