New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1887-06-17
besn shown that Sharp The detendant had been guilty

the Indictment 70 brbe the whole Board. and that 1t
VINO saw Keenan, Judge Barrett said that such test
pony might BE- ntro5aced n later sssSc when the
Odd you 20 and keenan, and have conversation
voted icT ,h fs.Optian on the Broadway Surface
ay6id you know at that whether the 100000 wasup'
Almost before Fullgraa could the question Mr.
up wh an so sf e yo e the
money!" Judge held that the question was ad.
mssable tending bring out evidence that corrupt
motive existed, and he overruled the objection
Q.How did learn the that money wss upl Al was
o-Beiwesn the by the Mayor August Is and tho
aa evening w?r yS az eses
o.-whal was aonel Ave talked about passing tho
oWas any said about reduction in
:as ss1 s% .s
from S $4,000 $4,000 and there was some
'na' .IsS 1snssSsI night Iss
called aSr O'Clock. was stairs in my bedroom when
did yam have any conversation with him A.yes sir
asked him what brought him there late He ssd he had
sign.
The witness here identified the paper which he signed
To the best of his recollection the paper had fourteen or
fifteen signatures before he signed.
spCT What s ss, to TSn Up rs
when got there.
GIVING THE JURORS A LUNCHEON.
here taken aed the jury was served with
luncheon in room In basement AFTER recess ME-
Nicoll inquired about the meeting in the Adermanic
chamber August 80, 1884. When Eugraf entered he
found lot OF Aldermen there Alderman Waite took the
chair the regular chairman, Kirk being absent Tho
order soving the injunction was read ihc resolution
granting the franchise to the Broadway Surface company
then taken up and all present voted for it. Fulgraf
then told about another meeting at Mcoughlins house
In the latter part of OcoDer The question asked
whether any OF the Aldermen were going to run again
that fall, and 1t was agreed that each OF them
that all would DO rcm0minated and run again
DE Lacy said that In consequence of the trouble about
the road they had to use good deal of money
penses for lawyers, etc. and that there RENAME" only
$4,000 for each man.
Q-Dd You receive slSOO0i A-No' sir. Altogether re-
QNWhst did you do with the money!
Mr. stickney objected that the question was irrelevant
and asked the be directed TO state
the precise charge against the defendant Mr. Acol re-
piled that the Indictment sufficiently set forth the charge
lnce 1t contained only one count Mr. s'icEhey pro
tested forth the charge In eight differ
en and that the prosecution should be conpe leu
to state what particular form the charge was to iake
upon to make any such order
Barrett said that he would at later stage when the
foundations of the charge had been laid allow the cyl
dcnce which sought to elicit by the question. Mr.
Nico said that the object of the question TO prove
that bride actually received By proving that he di
receive the money and made certain disposition OF IT,
He would prove the disposition OF the money by other
witnesses Judge Barrett, after consideration accepted
said nat he loaned Sc 200 OF the money to one CarncS
PROPRIETARY aCs Wn gave he s Dedy inc 20
he didn't deposit the money 10 He are p.no sS
Company. some he kept in safe at home.
He spent for personal aud other expenses 5000
sticRney objected 10 this ne Of Inquiry. Iir. Sicoll
torted that II the defence would admit that Fnlgra was
bribed lie would abandon the inquiry. I'VE don't pro
pose admit anything that this witness states, sil MI
how he came to make the Investment Reference was
made to the investigations OF the senate committee
AT one 81 ' exnmS S c Sad some
ton with De Lacy and other Aldermen
Was anything said Ia these conversations as To what
asked Mr. Nicol Mr. sticsnsv objected that the ques
ton irrelevant and the objection was sustained
A TILT BETWEEN MEssRs. NICoLL AND sTICKNEY
Questions as to the evidence that Fullgaf before
the Senate Committee asked. Mr. stokney oh
ected about state the ground OF his objection
when Mr.. Nicoll exclaimed 81 know your reasons"
Mr. suokneyYou cannot tell what is in my mind before
Mr. Nicol-I shall be glad to hear something from
you.
Mr. stckney called upon Judge Barrett to restrain Mr.
Nco from induging in such reflections counsel but
Judge Barrett had heard the little "spat and so the
A long ar!umcnt took place as to whether FullgraG
0% be & % rs 10 hoT a5 pc to %
tanned The objection but SAID taat
he might be recalled for the people to state his
reasons
The witness was then turned over Mr. stckney who
addressed him In gentle sympathetic tones, peculiarly
adapted to draw Information out OF man In fulsraTs
position.
Roa the 80 Of August yoa absegae9ty testified teat
You your vote I X."yes SIR. '''''-'''''
thought best for the public INTEREST," AYes, sir
In to other ons the witness said that he was
opposed % G on rs4 n r.moH
in the ONeil case in which, referring 10 tho time when
Moloney called on MN at Isn' ne aad testified as
meeting said that 1t was to pass the
interposed-that was 10 prevent backmalL This was
at variance with Fullgrah testimony on his direct *
animation that Mol0ney had told HIM that he would hnd
what the meeting was for when he got there Full
graf stuck to 1t that he was right this time and that be
ceived the $4,000 from DE Lacy IN two $4,000 pack
Q-You remember testfying this beiorei Ayes. sir
q DO you remember placing the figures differently A
No. sir.
Then Mr. stckney read from the minutes Of the second
whole 81 900 Fullgraf admitted that II 1t re-
ported he must have testified 10 that effect but he made
a mistake. for he only received $4,000 altogether
Mr. stickpey kept upon The subject Of he money re-
sweIiDg with apparent indifference until there came the
direct question II he had not received 1000 Ihs he
McQuade trial, but what he meant to say was
that he was to have received that sum not
read over to him the testimony he gave in The McQunde
different times and repeated IT. Fulligaf wished toe
plain how this was hut Mr.. stickney insisted upon
ao Judge Ba iq the Witness to his
own way. when be explained at length how $4,000 was
On both Of the McQuado trials, but aferward cor
rectcd it. Being asked sharply what was
to amount he actually received. Fugraf
srd that 1t $1,000 and $1,000 making $4,000 IN
In all Perhaps owing tho pulling and hauling OF the
lawyers he had said that the received by him
Sls 600 but 1t mistake and that all there
about IT,
Then the wituess carried back in his "reminiscences
OF corruption to the first meeting OF the com
biDe McIOugins house. and the conversation that
preceded 1t In the Aliermcns Chamber. Tho combina
ton made by certain Aldermen and which DeLacy got
him join for business TRANSACTIONS he said. and
political and IL afterward entered int his mind that
the combination In regard 10 matters
ha A
OF the meetings and what said at them having been
ELECTED as carefully If it the unearthng OF
newly-dscovcred mystery Mr.. stickney asked the wit
ness In quiet. sauve tone: Do you notice that In
describing the discussions at these meetings You have
ant tn and