Little Falls transcript. [volume] (Little Falls, Morrison County, Minn.) 1876-1894, 1887-09-23
DIsTRIC COURT.
A Large Number Of Cases Tried
and Several iYst 10
Come Up.

! Is Large Number of Cases Trisd
and Several Yst q
| Come Up.
s3isEs5
Tho district court for Morrison county
convened ii Little Falls this vesk. With
Judge Baxter pYesid ling. Several caIss
have been tried, and there rot remains
. large amount Of work to do. It'll
doubtful If the terms work cSn be- done
this week. Below ne give q list 81 the
cases on the calendar, and the disposi-
tion Of them. The result Of the trials
will take place late ia the term and win
Ibe published next week. n !.
CONTINUED CASES. s.:
Leon Houde W. sartelle Bros.-issue
law and fact; G. ALindbergh attorney for
plaintiff. D. NJ. Bruckart, attorney for
defendant. Il. 2*:-; 1851 Sk =sz
For trial BY jury. 1855
John Hish vs. John Vorath-issue,
fact E. B. Preble, attorney for plaintiff,
E. H. Farnham attorney for defendant.
Settled. .~ ... III
JAG Kuhn vs.. J, c. Flynn-issue. fact /;
E. W.1.horpe, attorney for plaintiff, G. A.
Lindbergh, attorney for defendant.
Action dismissed on motion of plaintiff.
A. J. Smith VS.. &c. Flynn-issue,
fact Searle i Searle.. attorneys for
plaintiff, c. A. Lindbergh, attorney for
defendant.
Referred. -
| Otto Bolster va. VIM. Lamb--issue,
law and fact E. B. Preble, attorney for
plaintiff, C. A. Lindbergh; attorney for
defendant. x. ..,.
Continued by consent.
APPEAL CASES.
! State of Minnesota vs.. Henry Oby-
Co. Attorney for Co., E. H. Farnham for
appellant.
Action dismissed by consent.
W. NJ. Fuller vs. Morrison Co., e. H
Farnham, attorney for APPELLANT, Co. At
torney for Co..
10 be tried by court.
J. H. Rhodes Va. F. McNamara, issue,
law and fact, J. H. Rhodes and Blanch.
ard and Sheldon attorneys for appellant
E. H. Farnham attorney for defendant
=, For trial ty jury. .>~..
State of Minnesota vs. Nathan A. Eos.
ter, Co. Attorney for Co., Blanchard &
sheldon attorneys for defendant.
Dismissed on motion of Co. Atty.
Albert Fergus vs.. Ole Moom,-issue
law; c. A. Lindbergh, attorney for ap.
pellant.
Submitted to court ON pleadings.
Sylvester Hennenlotter Va. Jas. Dor.
den,-issue, law.
Submitted to court on pleadings.
State of Minnesota VS.. J. D. Lachance
issue law and fact; Co. Attorney FOL
Co., Oscar Taylor attorney for defendant
Dismissed by consent.
NEW CIVIL CASES.
State of Minnesota, County of Nor.
risou, in the matter Of the proceedings
to enforce payment of taxes delinquent
on real estate for the year 1885, vs., st
P. & N. P. Ry. Coco. Attorney for Co..
Taylor & Stewart, attorneys for respond
ent
To be tried by court.
State of Minnesota, County of Nor.
rison, in the matter of the proceedings
to enforce payment of taxes delinquent
on real estate for tho year 1885, vs. St
P. & N. ?. Ry. Coco. Attorney for Co.
Taylor & Stewart, attorneys for re-
spondent.
I To be tried by court.
Doctors Upper & son vs.. Paul Betterf
-iss ue, motion for order Blanchard &
Sheldon, attorneys for plaintiff, G. A
Lindbergh, attorney for defendant.
Settled.
Rupert Sedenbush Va. Adelard Lemay
issue, law and fact :; Searle & Lamb
attorneys for plaintiff. Z. H. Farnhan
attorney for defendant.
Continued by consent.
Ernest S. Welch vs.. Lydia D. CASH
issue, fact; S. Il 0. Kipp, attorneys 70,
plaintiff, Taylor 4 Stewart attorneys fol
defendant.
! Verdict for defendant.
Jas. H. Spencer vs.. Gerry B. Pesvy-
issue, fact Kerr 4 Richardson, attor
neys for plaintiff, Attwater & Hill, ut
torneys for defendant.
| Judgment for plaintiff.
Sandwich Manufacturing Co. Va. J. G
Flynn and Moses Lafond, AS NJ. Lafonc
4 Co.-Spooner & Spooner attorneys fo
fplain,itf, Sesrle Il Lamb, attorneys TO-
defendant.
Referred.
Jonathan Simmons W.. n. Hans2n, -
issue law and fact; l.. II. Farnham attor
ney for plaintiff, Taylor & Calhun attor
neys tor defendent.
| Continued by consent.
]. C. Flynn VS.: Moses Lafond,-issu,
law and fact; E. II. Farnham attorne,
for plaintiff, c. A. Lindbergh for de
PENDANT.
Referred.
Albert Andrews vs. Curtiss q Law
renee, issue, law and fact; Searle 1
Lamb, attorneys for plaintiff, Hartshorl
Il Coppernall, att orneys for defendant
Continued on motion of defendant.
Jonathan Simmons vs.. John Shea, -issu
fact; CA. Lindbergh attorney for plant
if, e. P. Adams attorney for defendant
Judgment for plaintiff.
j. H. Baker vs.. Josiah Page,-issu
fact, Blanchard ana Sheldon attorney
for plaintiff, E. Fl. Farnham for de
PENDANT.
Verdict for plaintiff, $3.50.
}, Law and Cox vs.. Curtiss and Law
rence-issue, fact, Law and Billiard at
torneys for plaintiff.
i Verdict for plaintiff, $35s.39.
Josephine Vorath vs.. John Hesch-
issue, fact, E. P. Adams attorney TO
plaintiff, c. A. Lindbergh attorney 70
defendant.
Action dismissed by consent.
So O. Kipp vs. Richard Lee-issu
law and fact, Taylor 4 Calhoun attorney
for plaintiff, Searle & Lamb attorney
! for Infnp<lorf