Iron County register. [volume] (Ironton, Iron County, Mo.) 1867-1965, 1887-03-24
THE TRACKS COVERED.
The Time When the Greatest Republican
Rascality Might Be Punished Is Past
Responsibility of the Republican Party.

{ Z
] Responsibility Of the Republican Party.
| Our esteemed contemporary, the Albany
Argus, has not yet explained to its readers why
the Democratic Administration has neglected
to bring action against the Republicans who
have robbed the Government while they were
/, in office. The Argus charged that the Govern
ment, under the Republicans was s'n1ass of
fostering corruption" It asserted that millions
of dollars were stolen and that there were hun
dreds Of defalcations. Its charges were so clear
and specific that it was asked why the guilty
men were allowed to go unpublished. Since
then the Ar9us has dropped the subject. This
l. singular action.-TT0y telegram.
The Argns dropped the subject pre-
cisely because it had given it the fullest
| and most exhaustive consideration,
and, when accused of glittering gener-
| alities. replied by what our esteemed
contemporary in Troy justly terms
| clear and specific charges. There was
nothing more to be said on the subjecs.
But the Telegram is surprised that the
Democratic Administration has not APP
| piled itself to the task of hunting down
the public plunderers and furnishing
them for their rascality, and it regards
the silence of the Argus, in not ex-
planning this matter, as singular ac-
ton. Nothing singular about it. The
| first duty of the Democratic Admins
tration was to purify the public service
| from the corruption with which nearly
| quarter of century of Republican
| rule had poisoned it. This was task
that called for all the time and ener-
gies of the Administration.
The defalcations of United States
officials during the Administrations of
Presidents Grant, Hayes and Arthur,
as compiled from the public records,
show that $12, .476.4S were stolen
from the Government, and this does
not include the money stolen under
the whisky-ring frauds, star-route
frauds, Post-office Department defalca-
tons, Burnside's frauds, Howgate's
frauds, the Naval Medical Bureau
frauds, or the defalcation of the dis
bursting clerk of the State Department
Those frauds extended over con-
siderable period. Some have been in
vestigated under Republican Admins
tration, but the guilty men were, in
the most important instances, allowed
to go UNPUBLISHED. Dorsey and Brady
were lucky IN UnlS feSpocG-
1t is easy to speak of Furnishing those
rascals by due process of law, but next
to an impossibility to corner them so
rs to obtain a conviction. The ramifi-
cations of their schemes were so widely
| extended and involved so many in
terests that, like the spider, they felt
| secure within the web of their own
weaving. They covered up their tracks
without difficulty, since they had high
officers of the Government to shield
them. Investigation after investiga-
! ton was called for in vain, or, when
responded to, was so bun glingly man.
aged that no satisfactory results were
attainable. The only result was to
cause the rascals to be more cautious
and to destroy, as far as possible, the
legal proofs of their infamy.
At the time when they might hav e
been punished for their misdeeds, the
Republican Administration refused to
do so. Now that the necessary proofs
are in many cases no longer attainable,
witnesses spirited away or documents
missing, the Democratic Administra-
ton is called upon to punish the delin-
quencies and defalcations of Republic
an office holders. We recall to the
attention of our esteemed contempo-
rary the case of Surgcon-General Wales
and the correspondence between Secre-
tary Chandler and the lamented Mr..
Hendricks in the summer of 1884.
Mr.. Hendricks thus alluded to
Chambers connection with this case.
''For the Bureau of Medicine and
Surgery the defalcation is large, but the
more serious fact is that it could and
did extend through two Administra-
tons of the department, a period of
nearly four years, without detection.
You testified that some inquiry
was made, and the conclusion
was, that while there were sus-
picious circumstances, they did not
warrant conclusion of guilt After
notice, verbal and in writing, you left
the men in office. You did not bring
the frauds to light nor the guilty par
ties to punishment. What is your next
excuse? Worse, if possible, than be-
fore. You say large number of Con-
gressmen recommended that the head
of the bureau, DR.. Wales, should be re-
appointed. Members of Congress knew
nothing of the frauds; they had no OPP
portunity to know. It was within
your reach and power. But DR.. Wales
was not one of the three guilty rogues.
He neither forged the vouchers nor
embezzled the money. His response
bility in the case is just the same as
your own. He was the official superior
of the three rogues, as you were of
himself as well as of them. Neither he
nor yourself exposed the frauds nor
punished the parties y
This is but single instance of the
unwillingness of high officials under
the Republican Administration to brir g
defaulters and swindlers to Justice.
Er uno disco on,7aes So secure did the
gang of rascals who SO long fattened
upon the Government feel in their long
immunity from punishment, by the
strong grip they held on those who
might have eught them to justice,
that they did not realize for lon g time
the consequences of the change from a
corrupt to an honest Government t.
When they did realize they formed a
combine" against Mr.. Cleveland and
his Administration, tribute to honesty
rarely paid Chief Executive of this
Nation. Where most of the creatures
,s Tho loth1r