New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1887-11-21
ono ExrAEIhNcE cooD roE roHA
PRACTICAL GAIN 10 Tnr ErrrRftCANs FROM
IGQUoE TAX IrGG>f ArIoN-JU Dol kiNG oN mn


POLITICAL OUTLOOK.
Yor>G,TowN. Ohio NOV. 2p-Fcw persons wore
closely watch the political pulse Of the country than
Jud-' King 81 ~, CRY. lie SAYS. The results
OF the fan elections absolutely ,cur, TO cleveland the
democratic nomination SEQ that Frank nAtfOn.
who has been persistent aad seemingly mali.n ant
enemy Of Blaine thinks tho defeat ofGrant In Nv York
assures Blame tho lcpublcan nomination. think
that all anti Ilano Ecpublcan,, who ac not wifIlly
blind mus that Blaine is ON strongest man Loo ihr
pivotal -taic Of New York There viii IT, no further
serious controversy about that The question for lie
publicans to consider is Shall nominate Ilalnc and
mako de- Icraic fight for thr electoral vote Of tho
Empire staic. or shall practically give up SOW
York and nominate Harrison and lIawlcy with Wow
10 carrying 10th Indiana and Connecticut l7
Don't you think sherman could carry New Yofk 30
don't believe sherman l. strong In New York
aS blaine. or In Indiana. AS Harrison or ~ Connecticut.
as liawlcy. Ito Is ono Of our Frcaic,t leaders and
would carry all tho surely Republican state, and
Ohio by sweeping majority But any good Ecpub
llcan can carry Ohio"
How about Foraker =
Foraker Is not a Presidential candidate IIs is
IN spite OF Democratic fa-chood, and the foolish and
cAaspcratng conduct Of Some 90 sherman, supporters,
true 10 sherman III, great succc,, at the recent
elections makes him available vice Presidential
quantity, and In the event Of shrrman's failure In thc
Convention, lac might become dark horse cand for
the Presidency. Ny relations with Governor Foraaor
are Intimate and am that hi, head +, entirely
level, and that he Is In any sense a candidate, for
either Office
"Will Ohio give sherman a solid delegation In the
next convention ?"
"Ohio IS proud of sherman, and would soliIly sup
port him II convinced that his candidacy gayo tho bc,
promise ~ success at the polls"
"What effect VIII the Toledo Convention endorse
mcnt Of sherman have %
None, except possibly TO inJurc him. Have Won
observed that not a Republican orator in Ohio dared
mention It In the late campaign II the worst
piece of fOOshcs, that ambitious and fawning friends
over induced great To commit"
what caused Grants def at in New York y
Well, The son of his lat her idea ~ popular I'm
this country. Tic result IN New lOr Il, pose, of Lin
coins and II fortunate that Xteriuent
tried In a alto rat hor than In National campalgn
Aside from Colonel Grants apparent unpupuIaritv ns
IA candidate and thc fatal ioiit 81 minimizing Demo
erals In KcpublicsD conventions tho New Ork Hepu,-
ncan, now passing throu gl the same sea of d1l-
cultes which ongulfcd Republic In Ohio In 1852 and
1883. The passage of the Pond Liquor aN law I'm
1852 acnaird the liquor dealers and the German
vote. aud gave the Siso 10 tb" Democrats by nearly
2OOOO plurality. Tho passage Of the scott Law secured
plurality Foraker. Nhen the law was given limo
10 show its good qualities and tho Germans saw that
they simply being used To pail the dis Hers and
brewers chc, nuts Of The fire. they back and
hrIeh roll great majority for Blaine In 1884.
They have stood 10y since and nothing l. now
better settled than the policy OF heavily taxing tho
liquor traffic The Same elements which left In
OHIO of the Pond and scott laws laborcd
High License hill aud other liquor legislation Those
clomcnt, returned to under he stress of National
campaign They WILL think. In large measure at
least, do the same IN New York next year.