The Stark County Democrat. [volume] (Canton, Ohio) 1833-1912, 1887-02-24
Bar List for the February Term Of Circuit
Court.
ella Richeimer Granted a Divorce from
Her Husband, Michael RIohelmer--
Disposition and Filing of
Other Gases.
NEW CASES.

N meyer, equity My
" OIL Il COURT ROOM NO. /.
1875 -4John Il. Palmer vs. Jacob Mich
liz sale confirmed and deed orderei.
4528-Lester II. N0gel va. FIoElan @.
MSrohsnd; leave to file reply Instanter.
4456 Mary TOmbaugh vs. James Nc
DJwell. Trial to court; right Of prop.
erly found to be In the plalntiff, de-
fendant to pay costs.
D 3504-Jacob MOonsh0wer vs.. Christian
Oberly. Continued at defendants costs;
execution awarded.
4297-Catherlne Bowers vs.. Louis
Scott. Leave given plaintiff to plead to
supplemental answer by March 10.
4SD6-Lamb0En u GEay's Assignee vs.
Thomas b. Webb. Leave given plaintiff
to 1le reply instanter.
4145-National Fertilizer Company vs..
Lewis 6chilling ct al. Verdict and
judgment in cause $2,936. heretofore
tried at the May term Of this court, set
aside and held for naught; defendant,
q Stanton Webb. to pay costs.
3650-Thornt0n Kell VS.. Werner s.
Bro. Judgment on verdict.
COURT ROOM No2.
1896. AuItman & Co. vs.. Abraham
DeidTich ct al; default; judgment for
plaintiff for $2l7 So, 8 per cent. interest
from January 3. 1887.
G L. Myers vs.. James e. Bruce, cOndi-
tiOnal order of revlVor.
4505-The Gibbs 4 Ball PlOw company
vs.. Lorenzo D. Ball. Leave given de,
fendant to file answer by March 7th,
1887.
,EO26 -Keim g. Sons vs., David Kannal
ct al, demurrer to answer of assignee,
sustained; defendants except. Leave
given Farmers Bank, to file answer In
stanter.
44S7-F A. zimmerman vs. Central
Union Telegraph Company. Leave to
defendant to file answer by March 5th,
1887
5Ol8-Maurice Gantzberger vs. Elvirs
Smith. Alfred 3. Smith on his own
motion made defendant. will leave
answer by March 5.h, 1887.
5023--Ella ] Richeimer Vs. Michael
Richeimer. Plaintiff granted q divorce
on the grounds alleged In the petition,
viz: Adultery, extreme cruelty and gross
neglect Of duty. Ella ]. Richeimer Is q
daughter of Mrs. Richardson, who
figured In celebrated case In the court
Of this county some years since.
Judge Raley adjourned court In Room
2 until MslCh 7th. EHs..
AHARD HTT AT TIE COURT.
A young lawyer was arguing case
before q Judge whose self.cOncsit was In
inverse proportion to his knowledge Of
the law, d Z q, -F ~rf .
The counsel was endeaV0rlnR to sus-
tain q legal position he had taken In the
case. He proceeded to quote Blackstone,
when the court interrupted him by say.
ing: 1T Is presumed, sir, that this court
knows the law"
Yes, your honor, but the presumption
of the court may be rebutted," suggest
cd the attorney.
"slt down, sir, or the court will COM
NIT you for contempt. This court will
not be dictated to with impunity; and
If such an infringement be made again
on Its dignity, 1t will Immediately order
the offender to jail. 'N n'5
"Well, II your honor please, don't
say that my point ls we'll taken. have
great respect for this court hut I'd Just
like. to read little from Blackstone to
show what blamed old Jacks SO he
must have been.
- RESPECTED THE GAME.
Not long since an attachment case
was about to be heard before local
Justice. 90 .Hti p. /
who's for the PLAINTIFF" inquired
the Justice impatiently.
"Maylt please the court" said ris-
ing young member Of the legal frster
nifty, ..'Mr. H Is for the plaintiff; but /
left him few minutes since playing q
game of poker. He's got q sucker there
and Is sure to skin him II he only has
time. Hes got the thing all fixed 10
ring In cold deck, In which case he'll
deal himself four aces and bis opponent
four queens; so that Your Homer will
perceive he must rake the Dersim-
mons" ..'.rI .' j, RIAL.
! rDsar mel" said His Honor with
sigh. "That's too badI II happens at q
very unfortunate time" h-,n a-...i
A brown study followed. and at
lenghth happy idea struck the Squire.
"Bill," said he. addressing the friend
OF the absent H, who had spoken,
You understand poker about as we'll as
hand"
Y UNKNOWN DEPosIToRs.
The bill before the Legislature to "re-
Qulre public record of the names and
amounts due unknown depositors OF
banks and to provide for the final disp0
sitt0n of unclaimed deposits" is attract
Ing considerable attention throughout
the State. The banks are naturally Op
posed to the measure, as 1t aims to take
from them and give to the county,
moneys belonging to what are termed |
unknown depOsitors, that is, when the
date 0fthe last bona .fide item of debt or
credit to the account OF such deposition
on the books Of the bank shall be more
than seven years prior to second Nom
day OF May In each year, provided, that |
In fixing the date of the last Item of 1
credit to- the account Of any depOsitOr, |
reference shall not be had t" any item
of credit or dividends accrued on such |
DOsit." These unclaimed deposits are
not to be paid into the county treasury.
however, until eight years have elapsed |
after the filing Of the list Of such dep0s-
Its with the probate court Of the county. |
Some constitutional objections have |
been urged against the bill In its pres |
ent form, but II seems to us after care
ful reading that there Ia nothing In 1t |
that will impair any existing contracts
between the bank and the dep0sitOr. On |
the whole 1t Is eminently equitable and |
1ustland has already received the favor
able indorsement Of the House Commit
tee on Banking. The author 0f the bill /
ID Representative Coates OF this county. |
Daily Court Record, Cleveland. /
Hl SINGULAR vERDIeTs
An Indiana verdict. mot guilty, but
va recOmHend him Ylnk In df IL a0ai n n1