National Republican., 1887-01-11
THE COURT RECORD.

monds vs. United States. Appeal from the
court Of claims. Opinion by Justice Harlan
affirming the Judgment of the court OF claims.
United states Us Joshua Bishop. Judgment
of the court of claims affirmed.
Stewart Hnrtshorn VS.. Saginaw Barrel Com
pany. Opinion by Justice Matthews Affirming
judgment Of the court below.
United States VS.. Charles ii. Rockwell
Opinion by Justice Harlan affirming decision
of the court of claims.
Jas, I. sharp, vs. Chris Roissner., Opinion
10 low. s'''''0 0'a''"'0fu ""rni"S 'ne oecreO Dc
King of the Belglans vs. Jailer of Hudson
County. N. j. Opinion by Chief Justice Waite
affirming decree dismissing writ Of habeas
st:Tammany Water Works Company ct al.
VS.. New Orleans Water Works Conpiny
OF the court below.
Edward Kirby, executor, VS. Lake Shore aud
Michigan Southern Railroad Company. 0pln-
ION by Justice Harlan Affirming decree OF court
No. IL. Albert baldwin VS.. John W. Black
Opinion by Justice Blatchford affirming decree
below, Justice Bradley dissenting.
No. 10. Augusta b. Allen ct A. VS. the st.
Louis National Bank. Judgment reversed
with costs and atise'remanded, with instruc.
tions to enter judgment for the original defend.
ants. Opinion by Mr.. Justice Gray.
No. 9l. Felix A. Borer, administrator, &C., ct
al, VS.. George n, Chapman, executor, &c. De.
cree affirmed with costs. Opinion by Mr.. Jus
No. 81. Hobart Ives. appellant, vs. Joseph
y. Sargent. Decree affirmed with costs. Opin-
ion by Mr.. Justice Matthews.
No. 1922. The United States, appellant vs.
Henry II. .Philbrick.. Judgment affirmed.
Opinion by Justice Harlan
No. COL. The Town Of Enfield vs.. G. N. Jordan.
Judgment affirmed with costs and interest
Opinion by Mr.. Justice Bradley.
NO 50. Edmnnd H. Cope ct al. VS.. The VAL
le!le Dry Dock Company. Decree affirmed
with costs, Opinion by Mr.. Justice Bradley.
No. 63. August w. Goetz, jr., ct al, VS.. The
Bank OF Kansas City. Judgment affirmed with
costs and interest. Opinion by Mr.. Justice
No. 70. Colburn Barrell ct al VS.. C. L. Tilton.
Judgment affirmed with costs. Opinion by Mr.
No. co. The Northern Pacific Railroad Com.
pany VS.. Mark Paine. Judgmentiaiiirmed with
costs and interest. Opinion by Mr.. Justice
No 60. Edward Ivnson VS.. Charles III, Hut
ton ct al. Appeal from the supreme cOurt Of
the territory of Wyoming. Decree affirmed
with costs; Opinion by Mr. Justice Miller;
read Company ct al. VS.. A. II. johnson. Judg-
1en., men. affirmed with costs. Opinion by Mr., Jus.
No. 8. The Chicago and Alton Railroad Com.
pany vs. The Virgins Ferry Company. Dis.
missed for want of Jurisdiction. Opinion by
Mr.: Chief Justice Waite.
rill, Dismissed for the want of Jurisdiction.
Opinion by Mr.. Chief Justice Waite.
NC. NO. lG9i Edward .. HANCOCK vs.. Mrs. Eliza
Jane Hlo h9brSGk h 90 DecTee affirmed with costs
Ex paIte. In the matter of Stephen p Nor
gan, petitioner motion for leave to file petition
for for writ ,it. Of habeas corpus donied. Opinion by
No. 8 [originaD ex parte. In the matter of
George Ralston. petition for writ OF mandamns
denied. \ Motion e yaea,e supsrsedeas denied
Opinion by Mr.. Chief Justice Waite.
No. N7 The Burlington, Cedar Rapids and
Northern Railway Company, plaintiff in error,
vs. .,I Charles 4, Dunn, by his guardian ad litem
by Mr.. Chief Justice Waite.
No; 1873 Nancy a. Mag ct al, appellants.
VS.. VIM; L. Hyde ct al. Motion to dismiss de-
AT the conclusion of the reading of opinions
Mr. Chief Justice Waite said in relation to the
submission OF cases under the twentieth rule
1T is proper to call the attention of the bar
to the practical operation OF rule which was
adopted for the convenience of parties without
being inconventent to the court During this
flty cases, and of these thlrty-one came in
during the last week, the ninety days having
expired ON Saturday last. Had they been sub
could ali have been disposed Of without inter. s
fering materially with the current business
and without being at all burdensome TO the
is 9 we aEi with great
in the term when VIC have q large number of
other cases under consideration. Unless the
practice is changed we shall be compelled 70
abolish the rule or make some special order In
reference to Its administration"
Court In General Term-Justices Cox and
MerrlcK-Mackell VS.. Casaiier ct al; opinion
by Justice Merrick affirming decree below.
Hall VS.. Secretary Whitney, opinion by Justica
Cox denying petition for mandamus.
Circuit CourJ-Justice Hagner--Venable &
Heyman VS.. Bruniggen; judgment by default.
Baker VS.. sherwood; Judgment confe ssed.
Fisher VS.. McMichael; new trial Knight VS..
i. X p. X. X. Co.. default and inquistlon or
dered. Assignment unchanged.
Criminal Court-Justice Northumberland
Iypprecht, convicted of seeondl ollense petit
larceny; motion for new trial filed. Annie
Broadus larceny (appeaD; guilty: four months
in jail. Susie Clarke, murder; on trial. Assign.
ment unchanged.
Equity Court-Justice James-Goodman VS..
Bien; restraining order continued until final
hearing. Bush vs. Stanton; reference to the
auditor. Morris VS.. Chipman: commission to
take testimony of non-residents ordered to is
sue. Bailey VS.. Bailey; divorce granted. Bar
bour VS.. Riggs: order appointing richard Smith
trustee 10 convey. Race VS.. Wollard ct al. pro
confesso against G. G. Duncanson set aside, with
leave to answer. Quill VS.. Looney; order direct
Ing Mary A. Looney to testify. Hooe VS.. Peteret
al: appearance of absent defendant ordered.
Bailor VS.. DAILY; injunction denied and restrain
ing order discharged. Gilmore VS.. Chapman;
reference 10 the auditor ordered Miller VS.,
Miller; appearance of absent defendant Or
dcred.