The Dallas daily herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1887, 1887-03-08
THE COURTS
In Which Divorces, Damages,
Insanity and Debt Figure
Quite Prominently.

being the close of the term, there is
laudable disposition to clear the docket
as clean as possible:
OH Morrow ct al VS. b Waskom ct
al; dismissed at plaintiffs cost.
Lucinda Simmons VS. J Simmons; di-
vorce granted.
AL Hall VS. Bette Hall, divorce suit;
dismissed for want of prosecution.
Texas Stone Company VS. A Brewnlee;
continued by consent.
Howard s. Co VS. W F Bachman;
final judgment by default for plaintiffs
and attachment lien foreclosed.
Bridge Beach Manufacturing Company
VS. James A Mckee ct al; plaintiff sug'
pested the death of James A Mckee and
got leave to amend.
MT Gri6en VS. L II Holden; continued
by consent.
JE Jackson VS. Jackson; continued
by consent
CIV Housen VS. Bette Allen; by agree
ment dismissed by plaintiff without
Judgment against the bondsmen.
Deere, Manser & Co VS. b Mitchell ~
Co, garnishee; continued.
in de Lamar, VS. Texas and Pacific
Railway Company; continued for service
William Caruth VS. c II Buckrke, set
aside and dismissed
Samantha Wilson VS. George Wilson,
divorce suit; dismissed for want OF pros
ecution,
MP scruggs ct al VS. G w Quinlan,
continued by consent
lydia Stone ct al VS. w ID Chapman ct
al partition suit; dismissed by plaintiff.
Mary A Smith VS. Albert b Smith, dis
missed for want of prosecution.
The Kentucky Distilling Company VS.
S w Watts, garnisheer, continued.
Ruby Kirkland VS. Harry Hodges dam
age suit; dismissed by plaintiff.
Hunter Evans and Slaughter VS. w A
Stinson ct al continued for service.
Exchange Bank VS. S Ii Farror ct al,
dismissed by plaintiff
Wesley Jackson VS. Katie jackson, di'
vorce suit; continued.
Freiberg, Klein & Co VS. Foster X Daw-
son, debt; judgment by default.
WIN Hall VS. Harry Loeb, dismissed by
plaintiff.
HPLantz VS. Gen. Walker, continued
by consent
VIII Patterson VS. NJ II HIckox, con
tinued by consent.
Fannie Heifer VS. Harrison Heifer di-
vorce suit; dismissed by plaintiff
SP Emmerson VS. G p Eppes, dismissed
by plaintiff.
Dallas National Bank VS. II W George
ct al continued for service.
S p Emmerson VS. G b Eppes, judg-
ment for plaintiff final by default.
James L Lewis ct al VS. A B Anderson,
continued by consent.
w A Longmier VS. Missouri Pacific
Railway Company; continued by plain
tiff.
Nat Gunter VS. l. Herman ct al; con-
tinued.
Estate of w and ii G Merrifeld, de-
ceased, VS. B F Brandenburg; continued
by consent.
Kansas City Distilling Company VS.
Strauss & Levy; judgment for plaintiff.
William Tolliver VS. Martha Tolliver,
divorce suit dismissed for want of prose
cution.
JT Bolton VS. II Cumby and A by
sterbach; judgment for defendants dis
solving the injunction.
New York and Texas Land Company
limited, VS. the Jumby Cattle Company
and the Wade McCord Cattle Company,
continued by consent
Paul Glucksman VS. p LOOMS ct al;
plaintiff took non-suit and obtained
leave to withdraw note sued on.
Central Stove VS. A ID Sexes; dismissed
by plaintiff for want Of jurisdiction.
The case of the State VS. r w Harris,
charged with theft from the person Of Z
II richardson, which was in progress
since last Friday before Justice Kendall
resulted yesterday in the discharge of
the defendant.
In the probate court this morning
J.H. Cox was ordered TO pay to the
temporary administrator of the estate
of A. X. Finley, deceased, the sum of