The Daily bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Hawaii]) 1882-1895, 1887-09-30
Che 9ailg 8mlletim,
FRIDAY, SEPT. 30. 1887.
SUPREME COURT CALENDAY.
OCTOBER TERM, BEGINNING MONDAY
OCTOBER 8, 1887.

cheat; A. G.. Smith for defendant.
The King vs.. Kolomona, larceny.
The King VS.. Kawaikumuole and
Kaneakalau, robbery.
The King VS.. Lyons, forgery.
The King VS.. Kaawa, rape.
The King VS.. Keaniani, larceny 1;
Smith 4 Kinney for defendant.
Kaainoa VS.. keaweamahi, damage !;
Castle for plaintiff Achi for defend
ant.
Kane VS.. Nakaleka, Grim. con. !;
Smith d Kinney for plaintiff; Paul
Neumann for defendant.
Estate of Mauae, probate appeal !:
Kinney & Peterson for plaintiff; A.
Z. Smith for defendant.
Paniani VS.. Kaikala, assumpsit;
Monsarrat for plaintiff.
Kamaka VS.. kipi, ejectment
Brown for plaintiff Smith & Kinney
for defendant.
Perett VS.. Kaaa, covenant Smith
q Kinney Tor plalntln.
MIXED JURY.
Napahoa vs.. Chinese Union, eject
ment; Thompson for plaintiff.
Colburn VS.. Parke,. replevin !;
Whiting & Creighton for plaintiff
Smith q Kinney for defendant.
Manuhoa VS.. Ako, ejectment;
Achi for plaintiff; Castle for de-
PENDANT.
Kahanaiki VS.. Kohala Sugar Co.,
ejectment; Smith q Kinney for
plaintiff; Castle for defendant.
Kaaukai VS.. Wight, eiectment;
Achi for plaintiff; Smith d Kinney
for defendant.
Correa vs.. Kaulukou, replevin;
Monsarrat for plaintiff; Smith &
Kinney for defendant.
Cartwright VS.. Kanoelehua. eject
ment; Smith & Kinney for plaintiff
Achi for defendant.
All Fat VS.. Uilama, nal. prosecu-
ton; Smith & Kinney for plaintiff;
Rosa for defendant.
Kaupalolo VS., Leslie, eiectment
Achi for plaintiff; Monsarrat and
Hatch for defendant.
FOREIGN JURY.
The King vs.. All Sam, selling
opium Hatch for the Crown; Castle
for defendant.
The King VS.. Lee Wo Yiu, selling
opium Hatch for the Crown; Castle
for defendant.
The King VS.. May, selling liquor;
A. G.. Smith for defendant.
The King VS.. Loo Sing, selling
opium; Hatch for the Crown; Smith
& Kinney for defendant.
The King vs.. Lum Hung, selling
opium; Hatch for the Crown; Smith
& Kinney for defendant.
The King VS.. Freist, assault with
intent to murder.
The King VS.. Ahung, forgery.
The King VS.. Lee All XII, robbery.
The King VS.. Mok. Nee Fong,
selling opium; Hatch for the Crown;
Smith & Kinney for defendant.
The King VS.. All Nging, selling
liquor.
(Where not otherwise stated
above, the Acknowledgement APP
pears for the Crown in criminal
cases.
Spreckels VS.. Macfarlane, assump-
sit; Hatch and Dare for plaintiff
Neumann for defendant
Wong See VS.. All Cheu, case.
Castle for plaintiff; A. C. Smith for
defendant.
st. Clair VS.. Gibson, breach of
promise. Smith & Kinney for plain
if Neumann and Hatch for de-
endant.
Atkinson VS.. Cleghorn, replevin.
Castle for plaintiff; Attorney-Gen-
rial for defendant.
Hall & Son VS.. Cleghorn, replevin.
smith & Kinney for plaintiff; At
orney-General for defendant.
Waterhouse VS.. Cleghorn, reple.
in. Smith & Kinney for plaintiff;
Attorney-General for defendant.
Widemann VS.. Ahin, assumpsit.
Jastle for defendant.
McChesney VS.. Wong Chung Kee,
ssumpsit. Ashford & Ashford for
laintiff.
Spencer VS.. Dodd, assnmpsit,
'osa for plaintiff.
All In, appellant, VS.. Clip Chang.
.ppeal from Police Court, Homo
'lu. Castle for appellant; Neu-
lann for prepayment.
The King vs.. Akana. Appeal
ON District Court, Eva. Attor-
ey-General for the Crown; Smith
Kinney for appellant.
Ephraim, appellant, VS.; blk Forest
ueen. Admiralty appeal from
udd, c. j. Neumann for appel
mt Hatch for prepayment.
Olepau, appellant, VS.. Rahapa.
putty appeal from Bickerton, j.
chi for appellant; Smith & Kin
ey, Holokahiki & Kane for pro-
0nent.
Kaale vs.. Petero, appellant. APP
,al from Intermediary Court. Achi
r prepayment; Smith & Kinney for
'pellant.
Shar York, appellant, VS.. Alo.
ppeal from Intermediary Court.
lstin for appellant; Smith & Kin