New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1887-11-06
PRICE THREE CENTS.
DIR. MCGLYNN EXPLAINS.
ARCHBISHOP CORRIGAN CALLS HIS STATE.
MENT A CAMPAIGN STORY
ihE DOCTOR USES SOME FoRCIBLE LANGUAGE
ABOUT THE ARCHBISHOP AND CARDINAL
GIBBONs-EFFORTs OF PRELATrs
AND OTHERS TO HAVE THE CASE
REOPENED AND THE SCAN


|
| DIAL STOPPED.
Not since the expulsion Of DR.. McGlynn from,
St Stephens Church last winter has there been
greater excitement among his parishoners or
moro stir among Catholics generally than there
was yesterday in consequence of the announce.
ment made by tie Doctor at the Coo er Union on
Friday night, that he would soon be reinstated
IN The church and re-cndOwed with ali the priestly
functions OF which he was deprived by special
edict of the Pope about four months ago. Such
rejoicing as that INDUCED in by the Doctors
former flock is seldom witnessed The whole
parish was abIaze with joyful enthusiasm. and
everybody seemed to be congratulating everybody
else.
The drug store of DR. Carey. chairman of the
Committee of 1hirty-iive. the principal meet.
ing place, where all day long young and old con.
tinued to gather and express in the most hearty
way their joy over the surprising but agreeable
news. DR.. Carey himself could not rcprcss tic
qualification which he felt To many he dee
clared that it was of the rroudest and happcst
days Of his life His sentiments were echoed by
John X. Fecney and all the other leading members
OF the congregation who have remained loyal to
the depoSed priest, Notwithstanding the alleged
danger which they thus incurred of having tho
extreme penalty of the Church inflicted upon
them. OF course. none of them doubted for a
minute that the Doctor would come back TO thene
and that at an early day.
ARCHBISHOP CoRgIGAN SAYS IT Is ABSURD.
| Their solemn conviction regarding the Doctors
restoration, however, not shared by Archbishoe
Corrigan On the contrary he insists that the
whole story is most absurd, or as he characterized
it, IA campaign document
lie status of Or. McGlynns case is un.
changed" he said, when asked about the mattes
yesterday and there Is chance of its being
Icopened or rccon,idcred until lie submits and
PRESENTS himself at Rome in RESPONSE to the com.
lnand OF the Holy tatLer. 1he statement to th,s
elect printed lew weeks ago Is equally true to-
uay. 1t is impossible tnaI Or. AicUiynns case
nds Lecn or wIil DC rcopeIicd III consequence VI
| Dr MNDOnhcIIs recent visit u hUnIc lor tna
| reason thal Dr. McDOnIcll nds not uecn 10 liUus
ana VIII not 90 ucIe un,lI the emu Vi Dcecul.cL
alLr his return from rpIh, wncfe nc - nov.
ilc 10 gVing 10 hOlIc To atlcnu the lalai JuDIrcle
which Is ~ take pace at the emu Oi December,
The whole story Is can aIgn documcnt III NY
opinion ana has no weIgnU Whatever.
notice tl,tt IL l. saIu tnaI une Church dae
not cOAucnn llcnrA George uoctrihe lns
Churcn never lac>s tc toui"ec ol It's convictions
Ihc Church has not Olncaly condemned Henry
Georges doctrines, because IL never con>pderet
tncm worthy notice or condemnation. You
VIII remember however, that the Holy FathcI
in hi, letter to mc hceins by saying lou BRING
TO ny notice the false doctrines, etc. Is not
NlcGlynns friends however. desire to have thosa
ldoctrlncs formally condemned 10y the Church. 10
is easy tor them TO have i done; they know that
You will also doubtless rccolcct that the Holy
Father m his letter praises me for what did IN
attempt. NJ TO crush in the bud those false doc
trines, saving what had done was agreeable 10
him and bidding Inc to continue my wei"
doing in that direction. As 10 the statcmeio
that | shall write no more pastoral tiers. il ~
perhaps needless for ne to say that | shall con-
tnuc 10 write pastoral letters 10 my flock when"
ever think il necessary Ia do So"
pR. MGfYNN's INDIGNATIoN.
DR.. NcGlyn was sen at Cooper Union Just "a
he was ahout IL start for Brooklyn. where he
made several spoc,hc, last evening. lie seemed
in capital spirits ami pleasant frame of mnt
until h, attention was called 10 an interview
with Archbishop Ccrrigan that was printed n
an evening alcr. As he read this his ruddy face
palcd suahuN. Ill, icatuIc> grew stern. ANA
when hc spoke il Wa, easy To tnat the Arci.
bishops remarks, Wnch NclC Substantially tho
same a. those eiNcu aloNc hau auecrcu nm.
see. ne >aid. tnat the g.ratcr poruOn OG
this interview - IN tine Arcnn>nOps own woIus.
some ot the things - cnlpnauc'll\ ana o>t"h~
tduOusly dcn.cd are things tmt l did not say,
ana that the neWNpa. cr f"t ort> 40 not make ba
SAY but simply >tatc their own or some otbcs
authouty / never sad or implied that d.
NcDonnolls visit L. Rome had affected my case
,ue way or TIC other. In fact. | had iorgotnn
all alout Dr. Mcdonnell and his visit to Europe.
SO the ArchbiShop's >nccr with which hc calls tho
newspaper talk about Dr. Mcdonnell caml aign
document surely docs not affect me- And ITO
same must be- said 0i the news apcr talk-not NY
ralll-about ovcrtur,s having been first made hy
tie Church authorizes 10 ne.
TIE QvHsrtoN or M. GloEGE's ~ RE
III is extremely w'all and Icoish
on the part oi tEr Archbishop IN
try TO cyade the difficult position lie Las
created for himself iy compelling people to hcar
from Catholic aItar> what was intended by him
as a condemnation OF Mr.. Georges doctrines as
contrary to Catholic faith. now that it is weld
known that prclatc> >" Bishop NultS are tcach-
ing these doctrines with impunity: that learned
Jcsuits in Duhm in their periodical publication
nic cri,ici,ine hi, Archbishop Corriean> criticism
and that oicial examiners in Rome find nothing ia
Mr. Georges writings 10 condemn. Ii - moii-
sttou, tnai the Archbishop should say that IN"
Church has not officially condemned llchfy
Georcr', doctrine, bccau>c ii never con>iercd
ilcu worthy of notice or condemnation. ii the
Archbishop i still confident that Nlr. neorges
doctrines are openly contrary Ia the '"thond
faith does he wish the world 10 believe tlat th9
Church. because OF some foolish holioh ol "IInH,
would refuse TO condemn. II hcictcai. doctrines
that are rapidly becoming common among 'atho.
lies tbrourhout the Engli>h->pcaIng world:
Must we not believe that. if the Church does noe
,hnl, Gt 10 notice or condemn Mr rcor9es
doctrines in spite Of the scandal created abonV
them bv the Archbishop and his reiterated COM
uloints of them 10 Rome. il must he t''auso
Rome cannot conscicntiously or uuthluiN eoh>
denim them?
RATHER A STALE APPROVAL, HE THINKS
AT this late day il is very weak ON the paro
Of the Archbishop to quote the Popes approval or
him and his attempted condemnation OF certain
false doctrines OF course. the Pope now, aS
five years ago in tie matter of the irish Land
League speeches. if told that l and others wero
DENYING the right, Of property and were plTlcts
calIv teaching Socialism and Communism. he very
naturally would be Mortified and would instantly
condemn our action and commend tic vigilance
and promptness OF shepherds of the flock who had
anticipated him in condemning them But all
these things have TO IL understood on the suppo-
sition TO quote a familiar Roman phrase, 81 vera
sunt reata'-'If the truth ha been told us
| fnc 10 the truth had not been told them