Washington standard. [volume] (Olympia, Wash. Territory) 1860-1921, 1887-01-14
Supreme Court Proceedings,

Supreme Court Proceedings.
British bark Lotona W. J. ". Meal
lrp; fifteen days notice Of t:mr nd
place of taking deposition allowed.
\. III. Chambers, Mayor of Olympia
ct al. vs.. Territory OF Washington cx
rel. Ballard ct al; motion to affirm
Judgment denied.
y. VI. M"rrl. ". Manchester d Iiol-
lowell; Judgment of District Court
affirmed.
H. stevens V. :. d. Stratton; mo-
ton to affirm granted.
Cation Il Stanford W. j. X. SwitZlpr
Judgment OF District Court affirmed
o. L. and \. Go. W.. I. W. Owsley
motion to dismiss appeal denied.
Brunswick Il Blake Co. vs.. Tacoma
Mill Co.; motion to affirm denied.
O. K. and n. Co. vs.. II. b. Day
motion to strike bill of exceptions de
MED.
J. Leary and Henry l.. Yesler vs..
Territory; appeal dismissed and judg-
ment for Territory.
II. Parker VS.. George D'Acres; ap-
peal dismissed
W Maccvs. ID. ]. Gaddis ct al. rule
on Clerk to amend certificate.
ID VI. Osborne & Co. vs.. II. NJ. Van
Attcn; motion to strike bill of cxcep-
tiun> denied.
Isaac PincuS vs.. Jasper Hartman
writ of error and appeal dismissed.
Alex. Melville VS.. Chehalis County
appeal dismissed.
J. q. Phinnev VS.. James Hazard
judgment of District Court affirmed.
Waterman d Katz VS.. William
Lemon ct ux.; appeal dismissed
George Swift ". William Slime
Judgment of District Court affirmed.
+. Mceker vs.. A. Gardella ct al.
leave given to amend record.
ID. j. Chambers vs.. ID. Hoover; mo-
ton To dismiss denied.
&. Rosenthal VS.. J. &. s. Dannen-
baum; judgment Of District Court
affirmed.
J. f. Smith VS.. 5. C. Wingard; mo-
ton t" affirm Judgment denied
}. NJ. Lammon vs.. f.. Giles; motion
to dismiss writ denied.
o. X. Il. \. Co. vs.. II. q. OBricn A;
appeal dismissed
Savage W.. Maresch; motion to dis
miss granted.
J. Gardener Kenyon vs.. Knipe !;
Judgment Of lower court affirmed.
Territory W. W. c. Langford; mo-
ton to dismiss granted.
icslcr VI. Barker; judgment af-
iirmcd
Iesler vs.. Mrs. 5. A. Mott; same.
Strahlc * Co. vs.. f. III. Wind; ar
gued by II. f. Isham for plaintiii-in-
error and by J. b. Allen contra, and
submitted.
Singer Sewing Machine Compan,
vs.. Il. b. IIawlcy; argued by Allen for
rlaintiil-in-error and by Pritchard con-
ira, and submitted.
JOS. b. Thompson VS.. Cation & STAN
ford; argued by J. b. Allen for appel
liant and by Stanford contra, and sub
mitted. Opinion by Hoyt, J. Judg-
ment reversed and cause rcmanded
for further proceedings. Court holds
that the complaint does not state facts
emitting plaintiffs to equitable relief,
but did state facts sufficient to entitlc
plaintiffs to Il money judgment against
defendants.
o. X. 4 N. Co. VS.. 7. W. Owsby :;
argued by Allen for appellant and by
/. J. AnderS contra, and submitted.
The court made Il rule on the 10th
instant, limiting the time for oral ar
gumcnt t" one hour on Il side, unless
further time he allowed before COM
mcnccmcnt Of argument.
John +. Bingham W.. City of Walla
Walla; time extended to two hours on
each side and cause argued by J. b.
Allen for plaintiil-in-crror and hv
Sharpstcin contra, and submitted.
a. w. Holland VS.. Signor and Sig
nor; judgment affirmed.
Bradshaw vs.. Territory OF Washing
ton; argued by Foster for plaintiii-in-
error and 10y S. c. Hyde contra, and
submitted
Ainsworth vs.. Territory of Washing
ton; argued by q. W. Foster for plain
titf-in-crror and by s. c. Hyde contra.
and submitted.
Ill. Hungatc VS.. w. c. Raft; argued
10y Allen for plaintiff-in-error and bv
Sharpstein contra, and submitted.
Osborn vs.. Van Attcn; argued by
Allen for plaintitl-in-error and by II. ].
Anders contra, and submitted.
The Court is hearing cases from the
Fourth District. Second District next
in order, comprising the following
cases:
Ienkner VS.. N. p. X. Il. Co.
Brunswick & Co. VS.. Tacoma Mill
Co.
Smith vs.. Ellis.
Andrews VS.. Andrews.
Chambers and Mari vs. Territory
ex rel. Ballard, McFaddcn and Hart
man.
Carson vs.. Chandler & Co.
Langert W. Brown.
Bean & Co. VS.. Territory ex rel. Will
son.
Wcisbach VS.. Arnold Pollock & Co.
Tinnin & Farck vs.. N. p. R.Co.
LammOn VS.. Giles.
Kratz & Bonner VS. |. r. Dawson.
Meeker VS.. Gardella.
Chambers VS. Hoover.
Mace vs.. Gaddis.
Hoover VS.. Chambers.
Savage VS.. Maresch.
Byrd vs.. Forbes.
Holland VS.. Territory.