Oxford Democrat. [volume] (Paris, Me.) 1833-1933, 1887-02-15


.ented his own case 10 the consideration
Of the Court. and his excuse was re-
ceived.
Then the calling Of the Doeke, pro-
c.eded, at the close Of which the assign
men,s fcr trial were made in the follow
Ing order:
IN samuel II York vsJ X chaibOgIns.
IL wnism spsalilAs Y. Charles ' whit
Ill" i..rssy. ni.t.e~ whitman, s-..ey.
q sarah Ames. Admnk. W iissskiah q
$780, ni.bee A Jersey.
10 Consider q. fsrrsr We wsiio re'tsnshi'
Admr. -.
a. cnrord y Eastman W Elmer y smith.
walker, wriEhL Parker. hridEham-
- Lasias b Clark si Al W ceorEe -"
SPAR. ..u
- GeOrse 4 sAndsrsoa v. Horace Proc.
KimSan Chaplin.
= william " nIri '. John ' s-aia.
S IS Slir.a ool.u william { ii.y.: 49,,
~ rr.as n Triton v. Jane. Hamilton.
nearcs a stearn. ~ ChaibOarne.
IS frNhs Dresser W John Mitchell ?, al
rs iIiram Everett v. Ruth WINCHESTER.
Purinxton. ilcsfce A stearus Wright
an Ratn Winchester v. Hiram u Evsreit
wright rurinxtoa. ncArce 4 eteAfns.
~ Chsriss rhliooa W James hsrnls,.
81 ol. nAyford v. Lo-ell n smlih.
:, Jsas. Bsruis' v. cs.,is. Z r6lleos.
stsi ; Roll. ', uns.scs Esip -.
- Esr. Keen '. IIsnry p DOT@as,
q lts.ses Heart v. Ane. nl.,o'
. rSSassss ! R,ai '. Joss i IiLsoeae
llsmmona Moore, ,-Asey.
iu chaIls. n Go-s v. Emsry g fsaas
iu CasTlss Y Goa. v. Rosetta ioass.
>; css,ls. N Go.. '. Ensry @ rceas.
- Ss.ris. NJ v. william W Sa.os.
in Jo,iah Toilsr v. Rsuiamia . Gerrish.
ilsrssy. LAughtOn. savage cake
90 Thomas 4 Hardin We Inhabitants OF
Hartford
: William u s,issnsy W SalAaaisl ilnl
- s,.pssa . Aasiu. '. ch.rI.. pam.
=, '; sar.A J..l.ou. us1i v. BoriaSIa Jan.
n.mmoa.. B.Arcs stearn..
IL EscsS Abeo,i v. Chsrls. Z IiAr,is,l.
=; iiIvaL csni " Lowell u smith.
= Joaa e TssSs,n ., Al vs. William II
esry.
=, Eoosr' L wiley vs. Asnsr pavi w.,
s ~ &aar,- II Ras,ss ., Al V iisa1 a
small
s iii'' E..Sd ' Sa.ao '. raas KaissI :. 81
~ yssa Holman ct Al '. su,s 1. IIoimsn.
EAnialla nolmAn ieichefs
~ sisPosn r,y. or v, DAVid Il Iia'iinE' Of
m.Des. n.s,iaE. IIammon'
I, Is seldom that the Cogr, sets 10
work 80 quickly aud 50 easily /. this
term. A case wAs pat on trial the fret
day ,ras.iay a. follows;
l36. samuel II. York va J. n.
ada France. T. wilsoa. ~.
ecg,riI. trustee. THIS .siioa WAS brought
Coz TIE p,ymsn, o. = promis,ory note Of
hty dollars. which note bad been bara.
ed. Tie defense claimed that they bad
paid the note in controversy. George
H.I.s. Esq Of OIi5rd appeared for the
plaintiff and Judge George A. Wilson
iof the defense. Neriie, for defence.
TIE seeOad case that came 10 trial
vas;
los. william r. spAaldins ".
Charlie. =. Whitman. Administrator De
Boais Noa Of the Estate Of Il. III. Rec
ord.
Hsnsy. Babe s~ney.
This va. IN Aeiioa on = promissory
note dated Mach 20. 1858. fof $1,000.
given by Record IN bic lifetime in pay
men, Of al aoooan, due from bis brother
CLARK Record. 20 Mr.. Spaulding. The
defense e, up: "-As van, Of consider
alton. and insanity Of Record a, the time
OF giving the note. The Coar, in very
able aud instructive charge Instructed
the jury tia, II Mr.. SPAaldlns disehArs'
Cd his account As.ia., Clark Record by
rasoa Of b. II. Record giving this ro'e,
Il would be .sfieieai consideration
and ,k., !, ~, for the jury TO End. IN
der all the circumstance. in the case.
whether on the day Record gave the
note. be vas OF sufficiently sound MAD
70 have al in,slligen, understanding OF
VIA, be va, doing in reference TO that
particular Transaction
Verde; fOr plaintiff Si3.i9.
The nsIi case ior Trial WAS:
81. Sarah J. Ame.. Adm'n'x. vs..
HsrskiAA q. Ams. and Deborah b..
Ames.
s..,ey. Bisbee
Ia this case Hen. John 7. SwAsey sP.
pesred both as counsel aud also A. Nd
mini.uaior De Boais Noa. !, wn an
.e,ioa Of ,rover 10 recover The value Of
one colt. one pair Of steers. And oae
.hOa,. The plaintiff claimed these a.
goods and ehaitel, Of Msllen Ames. ia.
us,a,e. Deborah r. Ames claimed thu,
the stock ia issue was her property. aud
,ha, Mellen Ames, the in,e,,A,e, who
vas Der son. never owned them.
Verde, for plaintiff.
Saturday the COur, heard the case
ls2. Consider +. Fsusr W. Waldo
Pe,iengill. Administrator Of the E'iA,e
Of Rufus FsnAr.
Hon. John 7. sw.sey appeared for
the plaintiff. James S. Wright. ESQ 4,
aud Hon. A. II. Walker for the defense.
Thi. action was brought 10 recover for
labor and board Of defendants, in,es,A,e
and bis wife. And supple. furnished
them. The defense plead the general
issue with . special plea Of "no estate"