Salt Lake evening Democrat. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1885-1887, 1886-01-11
THE SUPREME COURT.
The Calendar Occupies the Atten.
ton of the Judges To-Day.

: Tne calendar Occupies the Atten.
ton of the Judges To-Day.
The Supreme Court of the Territory
convened at o'clock this afternoon, pur
suant to adjournment, with full quorum
OF the Honorable Judges present. There
was fair sprinkling of attorneys in at
tendance, and the matter of setting the
calendar for the present term constituted
the proceedings, together with the dispo
sltion OF number OF cases, noted in the
following:
The People of the Territory of Utah re.
spondents, vs.. Joseph Biddlecome, ap.
pellant; from Third District Court. Dick
son & Varian for the people. Sutherland
q Mcbride for appellant. Appeal dis
missed on motion of Mr. Varian, for the
people.
The People, ETC.. respondents, VS.. Pat
rick Callaghan, implicated, ETC., appel
liant; from Second District Court. w.
IT, Dickson and q. Snow for the people,
Arthur Brown for appellant. Under ad-
visement on petition for rehearing.
The People, etc., respondents, VS..
Thomas Smith and George A., Smith,
imp, etc., appellants; from Second Dis
trict Court. w. II. Dickson and E. B..
Critchlow for the people, P. FL. Emerson
and j. w. Christian for appellant. Con-
tinued till next term.
The People, ETC., respondents, VS.. Fred.
Hopt, imp, ETC., appellant; from Third
District Court. Dickson & Varian for
respondents, P. L. Williams and B. Sheeks
for appellant. Set for January 21st.
The People, etc., respondents, VS.. Thos.
Tidwell and Joseph Anderson, imp, etc.,
appellants; from First District Court.
Dickson & Varian for respondents, Arthur
Brown, Sutherland & Son. D. Evans and
Jacob Johnson for appellants. Set for
January 18th.
The People ex rel. J. w. Christian, re-
spondents, VS.. VIM. j. Cox, appellant;
from Second District Court Sutherland,
Royle and Lochrie for respondents; Ken
ner, Merritt and Kirkpatrick for appel
liant.
The People ex rel Compson, respond
ents, VS.. John M. Coombs, appellant.
Same attorneys as last above. Appeal
dismissed.
William Burrows, respondent, vs.. Ed
ward F. NJ. Guest, appellant; from
Third District Court Baskin and Van
Horne for respondent, u. Snow for ap-
pellant. Set for January Goth. Petition
for rehearing submitted.
Edward P. Ferry, respondent, vs. John
l.. Street, appellant: from Third District.
Arthur Brown and Sutherland & Mcbride
for respondent, P. Denny for appellant.
The Lehi Irrigation Company, appel
liant, vs.. Stephen Moyle ct al, respond
ents; from First District. Sheeks &
Rawlins for appellant, Arthur Brown and
A. g. Sutherland for respondents.
William D. Wilson, respondent, VS..
Tom Ferguson, appellant; from Second
District. j. w. Christian and C. K
Gflchrist for respondent, Zera Snow and
J. A. Marshall for appellant. Set for
January GOTH
Thomas Fenton, appellant, VS.. Salt
Lake county, respondent; from Third |
District. j. ID. Lomax for appellant, q.
Snow for respondent. Continued till
next term.
R. L. Brown, respondent, VS.. WI.
4ickard, imp. ETC., appellant; from Third
District. Arthur Brown for respondent,
Woods & Hoffman for appellant. Set for
January 10Th.
The b. & R. G. W. Ry. Co. ct all, re-
pondents, VS.. the D. & R. G. Ry. Co.,
appellants; from Third District. Ben
lett, Hardness & Kirkpatrick for re-
pondents: Marshall & Royle for appel
ants. Set for January 18th.
Uriah j. Wenner, respondent, VS.. Elias
ninth, appellant; from Third District.
Venner, in person; Bennett, Hardness
, kirkpatrick for appellant Set for Jan
airy 18th.
Allen Hunsucker, respondent, VS..
liram House, appellant; from First Dis
let. Richards & Rolapp for respond
ut; Dickson & Varian for appellant. Set
II January 22d.
John Jones, respondent, VS.. Hiram
,ouse, appellant; from First District. ,
ichards & Rolapp for respondent, Dick :
m q Varian for appellant. Set for Jan
ary 22d.
Charles Duchenau, respondent, vs..
Tram House, appellant; from First Dis
let. Kimball & Haywood for respond t
1t, Dickson & Varian for appellant. Set
r January 22d.
Charles Duchenau, respondent, VS.. !
ram House appellant; from First Dis v
let. Kimball & Haywood for respond q q
It, Dickson & Varian for appellant. Set L
r January 22d. e
Chauncey Bacon, respondent, VS.. Ben !!
min G. Raybould, imp, etc., appellant; u
I'm First District P. Ell. Emerson for a
spondent, G. X. Gilchrist and Suther- u u
nd & Mcbride for appellant. Set for .
nuary 10Th. q
Mound City Paint and Color Company, n
'pondent, VS.. the Commercial National u
nix of Ogden, appellant; from First q q
strict. Kimball & Haywood for re- ~
ondent, Ransford Smith for appellant. ia
t for January 10TH &C
John Gagan, respondent, vs. Lorenzo 81
Stevens, imp, ETC., appellant; from
ird District. Marshall & Royle for re- in
,ndent; Kimball & Haywood for ap- -
liant. Set for January 10Th. ~
Ohm Coulam ct al, appellants, VS.. Ann re
ull, respondent; from Third District. hs
II & Marshall for appellant; Sheeks & m
Wins and Dickson & Varian for re- tic
ndents. Set for January 18th. hs
n the matter of James Mcknight, pe- ed
On On rehearing submitted. Taken I'M
Amusement
KioEinr Aroiucf Nu:co-ooo