New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1886-04-16

conversation Of the day before In Which the proposed
n before So"gsS s n had Il been met With on
the evening before and til the commute" ha Vo
lis proposed bill lie expressed wish TO soc copy a
I ert IT, We weut over the b csIefuily together.
The publications Of the morning papers were TO-
eassinc Chairman ONc;irs bill was to the proposed
agreed upon arbitration ro III not De 40 lhuor ,ni,
,.rrfnllr and while discussing the jet OF arbitration
Mir. loGld shovel me dispatch rom JhiGe Dilloh ~
that carving it out SHOULD not he .isrd
% ne ss to Gerrh TX an nart OF the Work until
Judge Dillon could return OF tho following day.
Toward the end OF our interview Mr. Hnli rsce,VrY
q clegraphc which seened 10 disturb MN very
much remarked that something WAS Wrohs III T.
writing letter to Mr. Powd rly said 10 hi'n: Mr..
Gould, don't az this stage spit hairs. I.iHgra E n
Tie aske then could NO, go 10 TIE Ast'r House
md bring Mr.. Powdry do an In place OF Is writing
that something WAS wrong at the ~ Louis end OF MI
GoulTs wire aud he being unable 10 leave hla .eu,
to see Mr.. Gorld with ne. We called together, nut
with the hope that Mr.. PowdeI would be ~ , ~ .
oclork This interview adjourned until that unie
us before o'clock the hair splitting ietSr rom w
Gould was received and Mr. Inrner ana , we' ram
Mr. Powderly: DO understand fiom your personal
letter Of this date that your pary refuses arbitration
gone and Mr. HOPKINS held TINS er o", a.. . dis
tnctly no. we do not Hr l. not to so unherst'nd tl
letter but he is simply referred TO N TGuns m
communication 10 him. which MI HoHu is prepare" W
the meeting with Mr.. Gould then deferred unill
&c O'clock The following day. At 1880 lul boaru
George Gould and during the interview sgd ey D'Inn
and $ VI. ". Clark were in and ont. MI bouii ol"heu
the Interview with long dissertation on ahlrAtnh ~
q nrncplr and sent ny MN 10 MI. i'"Aic
telling him that he AMI his full board OF directors a
proved OF the general principles Of raon am ask
ing him II he w0uld arrange III some way 10 app
arhtrators settle differences. An answer came pacA
from Mr. Uoxip ranty rebellous - tone. pt l'rr IL
the day in answer to IA direct question MI hoHe 'el
or iphed the message which delivered by "essrs
Som erye and Clark and which ihe Executive m"a,"
acc epted basis OF their second order 10 90 10 Won
Interview of sunday morning was 10 ne commute ,'
ut uIOn resulting in the agreement OF tDe evening II
was " i"'""' ''"''A' e'' W. o. Mcdowell
The subjoined letter by Mr.. Mcdowell to Mr.. Could
was sent with the long letter OF Mr.. PowdeTlys on
Wednesday:
DEAR SIR: After receiving your verbal renly by MT
CYRUS Field 10 ny letter OF SUNDAY last to HIN ana by
MIN shown 10 you and Mr.. SAGE, wrote letter, OF
which in closed is copy. to Mr.. POwderly Iy 'ster
to YOU enclosed IN a letter addressed 10 me. With TINS
hand the letter addressed to YOU ana copy OF MI
POwderly's letter TO me. inclOsing the same. .
II wish TO me before O'Clock to-day the liihe
named in Mr.. rowderlys letter, Will meot yon III any
place YOU may appoint II n stepOrapher is 10 he pres
ent at our conference will bring mine. I Won desire 10
bring a friend with YOU will bring a friend win me
AlloS 10 add to what Mr.. PowGcry has san that /
also sincerely hope hat there Will be 10 necessity Tor
the publication OF his letter to settlement or me
differences that existed when was called into tina
matter i'll way that each party should nave the
heartfelt good will of the other was the tlns tat was
nearest ny heart. When the principle OF arbitration
was request ed and asscned et that this result mad
reached and congratulated myself IN so far as HAD
been OF in bringing abunt this happy con
cuslon and hope that 1t is not yet too late