Washington standard. [volume] (Olympia, Wash. Territory) 1860-1921, 1886-06-04
Docket Of the District Court

No. 1926, Hanson & Go. VS.. Shelton
equity.
No. 2,25s, Hanson & Co. VS.. Shelton e
al, equity.
No. 2,259, Hirsch vs.. Hurley, debt.
No. 2,267, Van Epps VS.. City of Olym
| pia, damages
No. 1926, Ballard & McFadden VS.
Northwest Manufacturing and LAUNDERING
Company, equity.
No. 1868, United States vs. H. C. Hale
! on official bond
No ?,O5l, United States VS. Huntington
same
No. 2,119, NJ Stuth vs.. VIM. Billings.
No. 2lS6, McAttee VS.. McAtee, divorce
No. 2,196, Olympia Water Company VS.
Burlingame
| No. 2,197, same vs.. same.
| No. 2ly9, same vs. same
No. 2,231, Gardner Bros vs. Annie ii
Shoecratt
No 2,347, Whitson VS.. Shelton & Co.
delft
No 1913, Territory VS.. Chambers an(
Burlingame, ejectment
No. 1884, Tacoma Mill Company VS.
McElroy. debt
No. 2,i0l. Lister, HoughtOn & Co. vs.
| Olympia Manufacturing Company, debt.
Mary &. G.. Patton VS. Richard r. Pat
ton, divorce.
No. 2,4l9, Olympia Manufacturing Com
pany vs. Fred Schneider, foreclosure
No, 5.425. Alex Howard vs. Frank A
Howard ct Tx, equity.
No 2,43S, Allen i Hardness VS.. ID. P
Ballard ct AL
No. 2,440, Leon f. Duvall ct al vs.. d. F
Barnard ct al
No. 2,442, John b. Jones VS.. his Crcdi
tors, insolvency.
No. 2,44s, Crane. Hastings s. Co. vs.
William Billings, official bond.
No. 2,449, Alexis Novy VS.. l.. Kelton et
No. 2,430, J. S. Rosenbaum & Co. vs.
Claus Il Harms, attachment.
No. 245.. Allen & Hardness VS.. NJ. w
Willis. foreclosure.
No. 2,46l, Langley & Michaels VS.. Jos
W. Howell, to locate deed
No. 24G3, John Nash VS.. b. +. Gibson
debt.
No. .,iG3, City of Olympia ". NJ. Stu;h
appeal.
No. 2,4G9, Mary NJ. Miller VS.. Julia S
Israel, debt.
No. 2412 r. F. Radebaugh vs. Little
john & kirkendall, appeal.
No. 3,4,J, Sylvester f. Strickland vs.. T.
Armstrong, attachment.
No. 2,4S6 the United States vs. Patrick
II, Carroll, recovery of back pay.
No. 2,492, Tacoma Mill Company vs.. b
T. Turner injunction.
No. 2,4y5, j. r. Dawson VS.. Kratz and
Bonner. debt.
No. 2,496, A. II. Chambers vs. Angus
McClain, debt
No. 2,491 the United States VS.. Sidney
5. Ford, Sr, Edmund Sylvester and George
Gallagher.
No. 2,49s. Allen & Hardness vs.. Stephen
Barker, appeal.
No 2,493, Ira Ward l. Son vs. Thomas
Wright. foreclosure of mortgage.
No. $500 Hutchman and Mann vs.
kratz Il Bonner and L. IlirSch. suit ON
bond
No. $500, Pincus & Packscher vs. Hart
man Brothers, promissory note.
No. 1904, ID. J. Talbot vs.. Thomas Mac
leay.
No. 1905, Angus Mechanic vs.. his Cred
itOrs, insolvency.
No. 2,5ll, Annie N. Shoccraft vs. Ross
+. Shoecraft, divorce.
No. 2,5l2, Catharine A Frazier vs.. l.. p.
Yemen, guardian of Eta May Yemen.
No. 2,5l4, Catherine A. Frazier vs.. W.
Z. Anderson, ejcctment.
No. 2,5.5, Mary NJ. Miller vs.. Geo. G..
Israel, Julia S. Israel and l.. Goodtime,
foreclosure
No. 2,5id. James Randall ". Iconie
ltarla, foreclosure of lien.
No. 2,5l1, John Kaifer vs.. William
kratz ct al.
No. ABS Narcissa J. Gibson VS.. John
Nash and William Billings, injunction.
No. 2,5l9 William Pix ". William T.
Morrow et ux.
No. 2,522. Daniel Hoover VS.. D. J. Cham
bers.
No. 2,5.3, Philip Ritz VS.. William T.
Thompson and Jennie o. Thompson
No. 2,525, Frazier & McQuarrie VS.. s
Wiley, damages
No.,2,53O, Mcrges & Vospcr VS.. the 0,
and C. V. r. II. Co., appeal.
No. 2,53d, Ira Ward & Sons vs.. H. W.
Johns. appeal.
No 2,t95, Thomas Chairman VS.. r. L.
Billings, debt
No. 2.547. The United States VS.. the
Northern Pacific Railroad, A. NJ. Sim pson
Brother Il Co. and HoQuiam Mill Co
No. 2,549, The United States vs.. John Nc.
iteavy ct al, cutting Government timber.
No. 1850. Mary f. Scott VS.. J. Ii. Nun.
son ct al, foreclosure of mortgage
No. 2,a5l, William SOmmers VS.. brig
Tanner.
No. 2,552, William Sommers VS.. Robert
Dyscbod, damages.
No. 2,554, Thomas Macleay ct ux. V. ID.
j. Talbot, In equity.
No. 1855, Ira Ward l. Sons vs.. their
Creditors, insolvency.
No. 1850, q. w. Manvill VS.. j. w. Sni-
der ct ux, injunction.
No. 1851 Newton Hartman VS.. his
Creditors, insolvency.
No. 1858, John NJ. Hopkins VS.. William
p. Book, debt.
No. 1859, The United States VS.. Joseph
Cushman ct al, bond.
No. 2 $50, same vs.. same
No. 1851, Emma c. Dunbar VS.. Horace
A. Dunbar ct al
No. 1864, Joseph Mauermann vs.. J. II.
Munson ct al, foreclosure.
No. 1858. Harrington Il Smith vs.. Au.
gust Schneider.
No. 1884. G. II. Sylvester W.. Fred A.
Durham ct al, foreclosure
No 1855, Washington Hartman vs.. VIM.
Mlnglc, injunction.
No. 2,5G6, William Reid vs.. Fred A
Durham ct al, foreclosure.
No. 1861 James Mcintosh VS.. Tacoma
Mill Co, damages.
No. 1858, Territory of Washington VS..
Gus. Balletti, appeal.
No. 1860, Harry Prescott VS.. Kratz &
Bonner 1T al, debt
No. a,51l, Nellie a. Hodges V. Morti.
mcr Hodges, divorce.
No. 2,572, Puget Sound and Gray's Har-
Dor Railroad and Transportation Co. VS..
Joseph Ellison and wife, Condemnation
of land.
No. 2,573, Same VS.. Mary NJ. Miller,
same.
No. ASA, Same VS.. the Tacoma Mill
Company, same.
No. 2,575, Same vs. Mary E. Marshal,
same
No. 1915, r, l.. Robertson VS.. Puget
Mill Co, certiorari.
No. 2,577. Gardner Brothers vs.. A. d.
IL 1t