New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1886-11-17
I,,arr sUJr THAT CAME TO HAUGHE
,o.~,,, xrrsr wAY1KD $4,000 FROM 1Hs

ruruuNE AND WILL fAh
Roswell w. Keene. a lawyer. who sought 70 oo'"'"
Ale COO from THE TRIBUNE Associa'''H ~ rs |
-. ,;hsl IN case in which wrong was either done
~ ;,.,Jsd bas had his case thrown out oil court
=, demurrer and Justice Donohue, OF the supreme
c.. IN which the act on brought. has gwen
Indictment in favor of the defendant
A. Ksa,e in his complaint. after setting forth
.h., the defendant published The TRIBUNE, "a
nevspaper printed and published in the said city OF
N,w-York and having wide circulation throughout
.sd city, the State OF NewYork and the United states
and other couDtr'es, averred that he had oeen uus
a. mjtted to practice as a lawyer; that ia 1854 ne
orgsuized comp sny for the Iurpose OIL rauing anu
dealing in diamonds ana other precious stones Wnicu
was duly incorl Grated and that he sent clrcus ~
r THU Once announcing the tact. Soon ai'e5
ION August is, 1854 he saysTd T. BIN puonsheo
an article stating that written reference was T
on the circular 10 the American Loan and trust Oo-
nanv' OF No. ll3 Broadway that reporter was sent
tbirber and was informed by Mr.. Snow VINO was IN
charge OF tue Oh OF the Company tnal ne nay
called upon by persons who said they spoke VI oena
of the diamond Company. Limited, ard deslren the
institution over which Mr.. Sow presides 10 become
its financial agent and that TO that proposil"a 80
cided negative had been gwen. Ii was anden 'hat
MIR Snow said further that ne had never before or
since known anything OF the persons or the enter
and that the reporter then maze Al no. IN and
nobody connected With the onld'ng Knew Wnen ne
would be- Mr.. Keene thereupon demanded Sio'oVo;
alleging that the article mad injured him In Ills gooo
name and credit a law err
The defendant demurred to the complain Oh ~
ground il did not state facts sufficient 70
a canse of action The was argued al the obecla
Term in he early part OF the presen MONTH ana yerer
dav the court filed its ocison sustaining tne century,
and living Judgment for the defendant The pianun
argued his case IN person and Corneius A hunAe aP
peared for TnE TRIBUN'.
HUSBAND AND WIFE ACCUSE EACH OTHER
couSIEk CHARGES MADE IN DIVORCE SUIT
nrD M WHIP HER WITH A TRUNK sTRAPI
On a motion for amOny and counsel fee
made on behalf Of Mrs Carrie NJ jacobson pending the
suit brought by Warren A Jacobson. Jr cashler IN
broadway nQuOrstore for absolute divorce charges
and counter charges of immoral conduct were maze
in voluminous afidavits. He said that she had
been unfaithful many occasions, conserving Win
numerous men. among whom were "a certain ciucrH
gentleman whose name Is unknown ana "a pesoh viz
answers to the name Of Harry and VINO mas Iahe
Mrs Jacobson on the other hand asserted that her hus
band jealous OF her and waen ne went none " b
found chair or sofa DO, out been SI place ysi,ed
bv man and would knock her down and threaten 70 XII
her lille they were al Niagara taIls one SUNNI ne
husband vhped her with trunk strap because she pro
posed 20 down from their room TO the no!eI par "a
enjoy the music. In August 1852 she eit neT nspunu
and With her chlid went 10 nv NIL n 90 ber fe
husband caused detectives 10 follow her ana MADE her e
miserable s e,a,,, dDied all these
alegaos and sd that he locked his wife in her room at
Niagara Fails because fitted with young uian and
enf times The case before Judge Bookstaver in the
Court OF Common Pleas yesterday The Judge granted
NO VERDICT IN THE VIVIAN LIBEL SUIT
The Jury in the $4,000 h5el suit brought
by Henrietta Woods against Erasus Wiman in the United
States Court in Brooklyn discharged yesterday by
INDIE Wheeler having failed agree upon a verdict
after having been locked up all night II is understood
that jury stood 10 for verdict Tor me uelenIe
iuaus counsel. Gilbert X. Halves. s;hd 10 lfb-
M reIolter: We regard this victory when tne
Judges attitude toward us is eonsldered ne shona
have allowed the jury 10 decide Wne1hSi luo 'O
uunication privileged one OF not The decisions on
The subject clearly show that the whole communication
was privileged but he would not allow our eAcepuos on
This point and Urged heavily III favor OF the plnuH
understand hOweN that this evident bias on MIS-
mart was important factor IN or favor Win the jury
No attempt made by the painn to sho" any damage
10 and. for malicious design on
Mr. Nman- part think the facts. which are known TO
All Newly orkers preclude the shadow OF such sus
plciOn.
ONE OF MRS. GAINEss WILLS IN COURT.
The proceedings 10 probate one Is Of Mrs
Myra Clark Gaines property valued at s25OOO0o IN
NewOreans when died 1883 brought before surro-
gate Lott il Booku discontinued few weeks ago
pIOceednE has been begun n The supreme Court IA
BROOK Mrs uIctta Perkins has brought sui against
grandchildren Mrs Gaines and MIS- Marie r. hNaA
who i n~med exeeutrlx ID one OF uhe wills Iae
complaint states that Mrs Games was rtsie H :,
Brook tor twenty i've years before nr death ahu l
size only tmpOTarly ID New orleans when she
died The follow N hoograpa WI Is onse ior ptoV !,
behalf OF the plAlntn WHO seeks 70 w
proved Nd proceedings recorded II NeW-Oileshs
NEw.ORLRANs. January . 1885.
Mvra Clark Gaines being Of sound mind 0elue@th 10 ny
estate known a. te fucl o.
properly my Trend MIS- Marie T. Evans, ont-u q
.onal, etW cen u grandchildren appoint Mrs aTle T.
stanontAry executor aud deSser OF ny estate
but without LOnd N a Ia y; " -, -
died