The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1886-12-14
Second Judicial Circuit COurt-De-
cember Term.
BEFORE MIR. JUSTICE PRESTON.

This Court was held at Lahaina,
Maui, last week. His Excellency An
tone Rosa, Attorney General, prosecuted
on behalf of the Crown, and several
members Of the Bar from Honolulu at
tended.
| CRIMINAL CASES-HAWAIIAN JURY.
The King VS.. Sam Hook, larceny of a
horse Appeal from Police Justice of
Waikiki. Mr.. w. A. Kinney for de-
PENDANT. Transferred to Honolulu by
| consent.
The King vs.. Kaahanui, selling liquor
without a license. Appeal from local
Circuit Judge. Mr.. J. Richardson for
defendant. Verdict for defendant
The Kingvs. Henry Il. Kaipo, burglary.
Commitment from District Justice for
Hama. Nolle pros entered.
The King VS. Keahi Liilii Nahina, per-
jury. Commitment from District JUS
tice for Makawao. Nolle pros entered.
The King VS.. KAPPA Dom Lin, desertion
of husband. Appeal from Police Justice
of Lahaina. Messrs. Kinney & Peterson
for defendant 1t was held by the Court,
on the motion of the Attorney General,
that the case was not a criminal case and
was improperly entitled.
The King vs.. Julia H. Haole, deser-
ton of husband Appeal from Police
Justice of Wailuku. Messrs. Kinney &
Peterson for defendant. 1t was held by
the Court, on the motion of the Attorney
General, that the case was not Grim
inal case and was Improperly entitled.
CRIMINAL CAsEs-FoREIGN JURY.
The King VS.. Charles Bolabola, com
mitment from Police Justice of Wailuku.
Defendant was found guilty and SEN
fenced to two years. imprisonment at hard
labor and costs.
The King vs.. Geo. G. Williams, appeal
from Police Justice of Wailuku. Mr. j.
w. Kalua for defendant. On motion of
defendants counsel the case was con-
tinued until next June term on the
ground of defendants illness.
The King VS.. Miyasaki, assault with
dangerous weapon. Commitment from
Police Justice of Waikiki. Hon. Paul
Neumann for defendant. Venue changed
to Honolulu at January term on motion
of defendants attorney, and with the
consent of the Attorney General.
The King VS.. All Chong, burglary.
Commitment from District Justice OF
Makawao. Acquitted by unanimous
verdict.
The King VS.. All Kang, malicious
burning at Paia. Commitment from
District Justice OF Makawao. Messrs.
L. A. Thurston and J. Richardson for
defendant. Verdict of not guilty.
The King VS.. John Enos, arson. Com
mitment from District Justice of Hama.
The was no appearance of defendant up
to the 9th instant, when his bond was
declared forfeited.
CIVIL. CAsEs-HAwAHAN JURY.
Kikau and Nika VS.. Kekehena, eject
ment Mr.. J. w. Kalua for plaintiffs,
Messrs. Kinney & Peterson for defendant
Continued.
Pooiki and Kahele, her husband, VS.
Kealakua, ejectment. Mr.. J. w. Kalua
for plaintiff; Messrs. w. A. Kinney and
J. Richardson for defendant. G Continued.
J. w. NJ. Poohea and Laie (w) VS..
Hele (w) and Rawels (k). Damages.
Appeal from District Justice from Molo-
kai Continued.
CIVIL CAsEs-(MIXED JURY.
Wailuku Sugar Company VS.. Paiwi,
ejectment Mr.. J. w. Kalua for plant
if; Mr.. J. Richardson for defendant.
Continued to next term.
Eight divorce suits were also continued
- ,,,.-+ %o-y,, 10, ~ y,yoof