Salt Lake evening Democrat. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1885-1887, 1886-09-10
THE BULLION.BECK BOND.
An Undertaking for one Hundred
and Fifty Thousand DOiIars-The
disputed Ground TO Remain
Untouched During the
Litigation.

At the time OF the rendering OF an
opinion by the Supreme Court OF the Ter
ritory in the celebrated mining suit OF the
Bullion-Be * Champion Company W.
the Eureka Hill Company, it will be re-
membered that the former company
asked for an order for an injunction re-
4training the Eureka Hill people from
working on certain disputed ground pend
ing the appeal OF the case to the Supreme
Court of the United States. The Court
ruled that the order should be allowed
upon the filing OF Il supersedeas bond Of
100000 by the Bullion-Beck Company,
and that in the meantime the other com
pany should have the use OF the ground
according 20 the opinion OF the Court.
Since that time Mr.. Beck has been
working diligently to complete the list OF
suretes, and this being done, he yester-
day presented TO the Court the following
bond:
Know all men by these presents, that
We the Bullion, Beck IL Champion Min
ing Company, corporation organized
under the laws OF Utah Territory, de-
PENDANT on the cross-complaint, Nicholas
II. Groesbeck, David a. Hilton, Fred
erick A. Mitchell, George Beck, William
Turner, SEN, John Beck, Rodney d.
Swasey, John A. Groesbeck, William
Groesbeck, Iyrum GroesbeCk Horace s.
Eldredge. James Jack, George ii. Tay-
lor and Henry Dinwoodey, are held and
firmly bound unto the Eureka Hill Min
ing Company, plaintiff in the cross-com-
plant, in the sum OF one hundred and
fifty thousand (l50,000) dollars, to be
paid to the Eureka Hill Mining Company,
or its successors, to which payment, well
and truly to be made, we bind ourselves
and each Of us jointly and severally, and
our, and each of our heirs, executors
and administrators firmly by these pres
ents. Sealed with our seals and dated
this 9th day OF July, A. d. 1886.
Whereas, the Bullion, Beck and Cham
pion Mining Company, defendant in said
cross-complaint, has prosecuted and APP
pealed to the Supreme Court of the
United States to reverse the judgment in
favor OF said Eureka Hill Mining Com
pany, plaintiff in said cross-complaint,
and against said Bullion, Beck and
Champion Mining Company, rendered on
the cross-complaint by the Supreme
Court of the Territory OF Utah;
And, whereas, the said Supreme Court
OF said Territory, by its order made in
said action on the 9Th day OF July, 1886,
that pending said appeal the respondent
be and continue restrained and enjoined
from working in or removing ore from
the premises in controversy, specified in
said order;
Now, therefore, the condition OF this
obligation is such, that ii the above
pn1I
Mining Company, shall well and truly
pay, or cause to be paid to said Eureka
Hill Mining Company all damages which
it shall suffer by reason OF said injunc-
ton in case the judgment appealed from
shall be affirmed by the Supreme Court
OF the United States, or said injunction
be dissolved pending the appeal, or said
appeal be dismissed, and ii said appeal
shall he prosecuted, with due diligence,
then this Obligation shall be void, other
wise to he and remain in iull force and
virtue.
BrliIoN, BECK Il CHAMPION MINING Co.,
Per Gro. REYNOLDS, Secretary.
Signed, sealed and delivered in presence
of j. q. Sutherland, rs to signature of
Rodney d. Swasey.
NICHOLAS IL. GRoEsHEcK,
DAVID Hutton,
+. A. MITCHELL,
GEORGE BECK,
WILLIAM TURNER, SES.,
JOHN BECK,
RODNEY ID. SwAsEY,
John A. GRoEsBECK,
WILLIAM GRoEsBECK,
EIYRuM GRoEsBECK,
II. $. ELDREDGE,
JAMES JACK,
GEORGE Ii. TAYLOR,
III. DlNwooDEY.
The sureties justify rs follows;