The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1886-12-08
Sunariar Court.

Room l-Hon. Napoleon B. Taylor. Judge.
Christian Kringel ct al vs.. Thomas Dean;
note. Judgment FOR $18947.
Petition of Watson j. Hasselman ct al for
damages, Petition dismissed.
Ella Mchlullen We. George A. Hanna; appeal
On trial by jury.
Room 2-Hon. D. W. Bowe. Judge.
Elvie M. Nordby vs. The Old Wayne Mutual
Life Association; suit or policy. Trial by court;
| taken under advsement
Eward Harris vs. Alexander Mcknight ct al
suit on note. Judgment for the plaintiff for
$55I35.
South-side Building and Loan Association VS..
Matthew A Lockwood ct al; foreclosure Jude.
ment for the plaintiff for 81, 4sl, Al.
David d. Long VS.. Charles A. Harris ct al
foreclosure OF chattel mortgage. Judgment for
the plaintiff for 1881. 49,
Dennis Kane vs. Anthony Prange ct al; suit
for false representation. On trial by jury.
Janewsy ct al, as assignee of Charles E.
Roll Claim allowed for 81. 095.51.
Emma E. Streebeck vs.. Herman Fl. Streebeck;
divorce. Transferred to Circuit Court
Emogen E. Woodall vs. The City of Indianap-
oils; motion for new trial. Argument before the
court
Room 3-Hon. Lewis G. Walker. Judge
Henry l.. Brown vs. James F. Davis; contract
Dismissed at the plaintiffs costs
Sarah c. Shapely VS.. Alonzo Shapely; divorce.
On trial by court
OPINIONS FILED IN GENERAL TERM.
954. Joseph Lewark VS.. Walter Stanton. At
irmed. Howe, 1.-The judge where the Jury
has been unable to agree, may read again the
instructions on his own motion, in open court,
when an attorney for one of the parties is alb.
sent, having waited for him nearly an hour and
may return the jury for further deliberaton,
telling them that it Is for the interest Of the
public as we'll as the parties. that they should
agree.
952. Joseph Lewark vs.. George H. Carter ct
al. Affirmed. Taylor, J.-Where there is no
proof that sheriff was acting under the instruc
tious Of the plaintiffs in the sale of personal
property on execution. they are not liable to
purchaser for the repayment of the money he
had paid (2.) Where deputy stated at the
sale in question, that the title was all right
which he believed to be true and had no actual
intention of deceiving, and there are no circum-
stances shown which authorized the purchaser
to rely upon the statement, the sheriff is not
chargeable.
GAG. Ralph Hill ct al VS. Thomas j. Burns ct
al. Affirmed. Taylor. J.-When an owner by
entirety mortgaged with warranty his interest
to secure the payment of attorneys fees in de-
Tending suit for divorce by his co-tenant upon
the decree of divorce and the sale of the land
upon other executions the mortgage could re-
deem, and foreclose and enforce to collection of
redemption money ETC., paid by them.
932 Frank L. Ritzinger vs.. Milton Ponder ct
al Reversed Walker, J.-Reversed on the
authority of Pouder vs. Ritzinger. (102 Ind. i,
5nl
NEW SUITS.
Anna r. Fowler vs. Ashley j. Elliott; COM
plant for libel Damages, S., 000
Isaac n. Mugg vs.. James B. Watts ct al.
complaint on note Demand, $400
Samuel w. Watts VS.. Henry Calvin; com.
plant on note. Demand, $3.50.
James B. Gascoigne vs.. Cyrus W. Brown
complaint on note Demand, $3.50
Martha E. Bulla VS.. Walter Fl. Eastman ct al :
complaint for possession. Demand, $780,
John S. Boyer vs.. Ida Boyer complaint for
divorce. Allegation, cruelty,
Edward Lawson vs.. Mary lawson complaint
for divorce. Allegation, abandonment.
Thomas NJ Stuart vs.. r @. Dun ct al; COM
plant for libel. Damages. $50. 600