Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1886-06-19
q. ssa'n' M 4. IS now

chects'l VIII never De gulltyof dishOn-
esty in promising 10 you without the re-
lection of new plans 70 give eject 10 the
principle. | will never accept new plans
nnlcss believe them
Rerrrn THAN rHE ON ONES.
have Aa-n gr,evously disappointed
~ the btrrenness aud steriilty Of
mtnd my Critics have shown
concerning our plans. Whon they raised
objections, the least thing they have
shown themselves capable 10 do has been
x suEges, Improvement. ECheers Per.
hAps they thought they would not waste
the treasury OF their minds on such an
Improbable audience as the present gov
eminent Perhaps when they are re-
turned 20 parliament such OF them as yet
there will produce Que or more excellent
plans. They Will fnd us first
most eager TO hall and welcome
them, and we win promise In
the house Of our colleague 10 cast our
own Dill 70 the winds the moment we are
SHOWN better plan 10 give eject 10 our
principle 3provided Il IS not an evasion
Of the subject or artificial machinery de-
vssed to deiraud the irish OF their hope OF
justice. Ministerial candidates must net
be tested by the bin we intro
1uced in parliament, because IL
was the best I'VE could frame
and doubtless they are better men than
we, and II SO, they viii frame
a much better bin OF put us In the way OF
doing its and II they do this, they Will
not be more happy than we, perhaps not
quite so happy.
The Scotsman says "every minstc-
rialist must be considered and pledged
20 support the hillih he can hardly be
pledged 70 support the bin
as a ministerialist when the
ministry Itself does not ask
or expect II. We expect them to act In
good faith, knowing the meaning OF his
words and not using others as felnts or
strategios TO escape from Il, but shall In
the meaning Of his words give Ireland
real and effective control OF her local at
fairs, II he Is ready to do that lac is
good ministerial candidate. Il he
| pledges himself TO do that let him speak
by the hour or the yard II he likes, 10
the satisfaction OF the Scots
man, against the vice, defects,
weaknesses and lallacies OF the hlll,
What the nation has 60 decide Il not
the clause, detail, or method OF the bill,
but the policy and principle embodied
therein. He who accepts them Is
our brother in arms, he who
repels them, strikes them or
uses fic Gus means to I'll iiy them
is our adversary In the fight, whom we
must, without Injury TO his life, limp or
/ reputation, endenvor 70 defeat. read In
London that Scotland was doubtful or
averse TO home rule. answered did
not believe it. tCheers saw enough
in my progress yesterday 10 show me that
Scotland was
NEyKR MORE EARNESTLY nHNr
\ on the work and policy and justice 10
accomplish the present enterprises.
| Loud chr ers. Regarding the Cnrnar-
Farnen incident, blame neither. 1t
is extremely important TO know what
happened parnell said Carnarvon
offered, II the Conservatives were
successful IN the elections, to
grant the home.rule measure and TO
protect Irish Industries. Earl Carnaryon
denied the accuracy Of the statement, hut
| Parnell adheTos TO IL. believe that both
have spoken with perfect veraclty, what
ever may be the point OF dispute be-
| tween them, but the earl OF Carnarvon
| told US what nc did not say, and said he
| did not report the conversation 10 the
cabinet. Earl Carnarvon explained his
views as lord lieutenant, and as cabinet
minister Lord Carnaryon told his coll
leagues that he favored a plan that would
meet the wants OF Ireland In respect
20 local selfgoyernment, and would
| To some extent satisfy national
aspirations. Lord Carnarvon may dis
| like IL, but In substance
HE Is OUR MAN,
not theirs, II he IL ready to meet the
/
ment disturbance and cries OF "turn
them Quit" and also in some degree TO
satisfy the national aspirations Of Ireland,
There is no room for dispute between
| him and us. The marquis OF Harrington
and Chamberlain carefully avoided ex-
pressing readiness To satisfy IN the
same degree the national aspirations Of
ireland. This, and no other, Is the turn
ing point. These are Lord Carnaryon's
opinions, this Is what he said,
but call his attention and shall call II
repeatedly II necessary, TO what he did
not say. He has not stated what he did
say 10 Parnell. shall believe,
until contradicted, he told Par
nell he favored satisfying the wants
| Of Ireland fully with regard 10 local self
| government, and that he desired 10 snt-
isiy Ireland's national aspirations. Why
did not the cabinet expel this dis.uni0n-
list for his misdeeds. But for the fact
! that they were sorry TO lose him2 be-
| lieye Earl Carnsrnon's statement
that he never told the cabinet
| but feel sure he told Earl Salisbury be-
cause 1t was his absolute duty and be-
cause he was not entitled TO such u staie-
ment from Parnell and withhold " from
the premier. II he did 80 VIC know
Earl Salisbury until August knew that
his colleague was In communication with
the great ''iismemberer" do not iiud
fault with Earl Salisbury II he enter
lalned wish in the same direction a.
Earl Carnaryon. ] think II very nnwise
of Earl Salisbury. The summit Of my
ambition would have been 70 support him
and give effect 10 his wise inclination. 4
Earl Salisbury faiteredand cOquetted with
that subject before the election was over
and forty seats secured, he has carefully
concluded that his opinion Of satisfying
the national aspirations Of ireland Is DIFF
Indignation and ACKNOWLEDGMENT. II suct
is the case he has a serious responsibility
| ...tf.,g u,.nn him and a dtflicaIit AZ