The Hawaiian gazette., 1886-03-30


Attorney General for Grown.
Malani vs.. Publ. Eiectment. Kinney Peter.
son for plaintiff; Morsarrat, Thurston for defend
Rose vs.. Smith. Eiectment. Hatch for plain.
tiff; AshfordG Ashford for defendant.
Hopkins vs.. Kapihe. Eiectment Castle fol-
Hopkins vs.. HaDiho. Eiectment Castle fol-
plaintiff.
Hcckley VS.. Along. Eiectment. Neumann fol
plaintiff; Austin, Smith for defendant.
Holt IS, BrQdie. Repleyen. Kinney and Peter
son for plaintiff; Smith for defendant.
Rice vs.. Pain. Eiectment. Dole for plaintiff.
Agnew vs.. Richardson. Assumpsit. Kinney and
Peterson for plaintiff; Thurston for defendant.
Agnew vs., Richardson. AssumpsIt. Kinney and
Peterson for plaintiff; lhurston for defendant.
NRhai VS. MahOe Eiectmcnt. Poepoe for
plaintiff; Dole for defendant.
Chapman VS.. Hawaiian Government. Dole,
Thurs.on for plaintiffi Attorney General.
FOREIGN JURY, CRIMINAL.
The King vs. 4. b. Walker House breaking
Attorney General for Grown; Hatch, Smith for
defendant.
The King VS.. Lnu Pung Chew. Assault and
Battery, AGprney-General for Grown; Avery for
defendant.
The King VS. Chuu Hook House breaking.
Attorney General for Crown.
The King vs.. Frank Motcalf. Forgery. Attor-
neY- General for Grown.
The King vs.. All Yau. Possession OF Opium.
-Ahh'AAANg NisLAIl'AA ASA AN'' AAANAs ANA
ant.
FOREIGN JURY CIVIL.
Homer vs.. SpTeckels. As5umpsit. Austin, Dole
for plaintiff; Neumann Hatch for defendant.
ROwell vs.. ReCiDr0city Sugar Co. Assumpsit
Dole for plaintiff Castle for defendant.
Ching On VS.. Amana. Eiectment. Magoon,
Kinney and Peterson for plaintiff; Brown for
defendant.
Union Feed Co., VS.. Hawaiian Livery Stable Co
AssumpsIt. Brown for plaintiff.
All Choy vs. Soper. Trespass. Kinney and
Peterson f0F plaintiff
Ahlo VS.. Mung Hui, Eioctment. Castle for
plaintiff. liiit -4I's- li...'-
Rebello VS. Gerard. Covenant Dole for plain.
II Tinker vs.. JGfsharn. Assampsit. Austin for
plaintiff; Kinney and Peterson for defendant.
Singer vs.. Ryan. Assumpsit. Dole for plaintiff
Kinney, Peterson and Smith for defendant.
Campbell Us. Tome Refusing bound service
Brown for plaintiff Whiting for defendant.
BASCO.
Ouomea Sugar Go. VS.. Austin, appellant. Con.
tempt OF Court. Hatch for plaintiff; Ashford &
Ashford and ThurstOn for appellant.
Board of Immigration, appellant VS.. Sousa. APP
peal from Hart, Circuit J. Dole for defendant
Silva, Appellant vs. Lopez. Equity appeal. Ash
ford d Ashford for appellant; Hatch, Brown and
Pualani, Appellant ". Nakaleka. Appeal from
Fernandez Circuit J.
Lopez, Appellant vs.. Acheu. Equity appeal
Castle and Avery for appellant; Hatch for defend
Robinson vs.. Sresovich, Appellant. Exceptions
Hatch for plaintiff; Neumann and Whiting for ap
pellant
Phillips, Appellant vs.. Waller Exceptions
Neumann for appellant; Whiting and Hatch for de
PENDANT.
Kahananui, appellant, VS. Kapula. Appeal from
Fernandez, Circuit j.
The King vs. Tai Wa, Appellant Appeal from
Police Justice, Honolulu. Ashford d Ashford fol
appellant; Attorney General for the King.
The NngEs Tai Va Appellant. Appeal from
Police Justice, Honolulu. Ashford d. Ashford fo
appellant; Attorney General for the King.
Lam Zip, Appellant vs.. Chin Sing. Appeal from
Police Justice, Honolulu. Ashford d Ashford fol
appellant.
Nakuaimano VS.. Achoi, Appellant. Exceptions
kinney q Peterson for plaintiff; Ashford d Ash
ford for appellant.
DIVORCES.
Ebeling Ok vs.. Ebeling tw.) Ashford & Ash
ford for plaintiff.
Bode ~ vs.. Bode W. Whiting for plaintiff
Attorney General for defendant.
kaaipuni wv vs.. Kekala (k.) Hatch for plain
tiff.
Kamaka (w) vs. Lena lk) Kane for plaintiff
Puuoniori lk.l VS.. PuuOnioni W. Magoon TO
| plaintiff.
Clark * vs. Clark W. Magoon for plaintiff
| Lila w. vs.. Paea * Dole for plaintiff.
Nordberg WI VS.. Nordberg (k.) Kinney ant
Peterson for plaintiff.
Kamili lk,l VS.. Alapai wv