The daily herald. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1886-1887, 1886-12-28
SUPREME COURT.
Calendar of January Term Beginning
Monday, January grid, 1887

The King VS.. Kauka Larceny
The King VS.. Frank Davis. Bur
glary.
The King VS. Paulo. Murder,
The King vs. Haolellilii. Robbery.
The King VS.. Hook. Larceny
Attorney General for the Crown in
each case above.
Kalaeokekoi VS.. Kahele. Eject
ment Thompson for plaintiff, Brown
for defendant.
Estate of Unea. Probate Appeal.
Holokahiki for plaintiff, Kinney &
Peterson for defendant.
Pelekini VS.. Kaulali. Assumpsit.
Dole for defendant.
Estate of Manae. Probate Appeal.
Kinney & Peterson for appeal, Smith
contra.
Makauhana vs. Pua. Ejectment.
Kinney & Peterson for plaintiff, Holo-
kahiki for defendant.
Rose VS.. Smith. Ejectment. Kin.
ney & Peterson for plaintiff, Ashford &
Ashford for defendant.
Keliikanakaole VS.. Kawaa. Eject
ment. Kinney & Peterson for plain
tiff.
Kela VS. Pahuilima. Ejectment.
Kinney & Peterson for plaintiff, Rosa
for defendant.
MIXED JURY, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY IL.
Kaahu VS.. All Nee. Ejectment
Ashford & Ashford for plaintiff, Dole
for defendant
Kalua VS.. Selig Assumpslt. Neu-
mann for plaintiff, Dole for defendant
Alau VS.. Everett. Case Ashford
& Ashford for plaintiff, Rosa for de
PENDANT.
Allen & Robinson VS.. Naone, AS
sumpsit Kinney & Peterson for plain
tiffs.
Puka VS.. Hoo Mau. Ejectment
Hatch for plaintiff.
Tregloan VS.. Bertelmann. Assump-
sit Ashford & Ashford for plaintiff
Hebron vs. Kameenui. Ejectnent.
Brown for plaintiff
Ahsin VS. Uilama. Damage. Kin
ney & Peterson for plaintiff.
| Ami VS.. Everett Case. Ashford &
Ashford for plaintiff.
FOREIGN JURY, MONDAY, JANUARY II,
The King vs. All Ing. Possession
of Opium.
The King VS.. McChesney & Nc
Giffin. Larceny.
| The King VS.. McCofee Larceny
| Smith and Creighton for defendant.
The King VS.. Miyasaki Assault
with deadly weapon. Defendant com
mitted suicide.
The King VS.. All Pong. Larceny
Magoon for defendant.
Attorney General for the Crown il
each case above.
Gibson VS.. Manuel. Debt. Castle
for plaintiff
Fisher VS.. Horner. Assumps t
Brown for plaintiff.
Allen & Robinson VS.. Kavanagh
Assumpsit Kinney & Peterson 70
plaintiffs.
McGrew VS.. Barnes & McCandless
Assumpsit Dole and Neumann 70
plaintiff, Brown, Kinney & Peterson
for defendants.
Pratt VS. Spalding. Assumpsit
Creighton for plaintiff, Dole for de
fendant.
Hackfeld & Co. VS.. Kavanagh. AS
sumpsit
: Veasey VS.. Herbert. Case. Ash
ford & Ashford for plaintiff, Avery TO
defendant.
Rice VS., Cornwell. Assumpst. Kin
ney & Peterson for plaintiff, Neumanl
for defendant.
Lame VS.. Crack. Assumpsit Ash
ford for plaintiff
Michiels VS.. Commercial Insuranc
! Company. Neumann and Whiting s
) Creighton for plaintiff, Dare for de
PENDANT
Z Michiels VS. Hartford Insuranc
, Company. Neumann and Whiting {
Creighton for plaintiff, Dare for dc
: PENDANT.
: Nicola vs. Lopez Assumpsit. Brow
S for plaintiff.
) Wilder & Co. VS.. Hop Wo Wal CO
( Assumpsit Ashford & Ashford fo
e plaintiffs.
Joseph VS.. Wilcox. Assumpsi
1 Brown for plaintiff.
f Ashford VS.. All Pow. Covenant
: Ashford & Ashford for plaintiff
y Michiels VS.. South British Insuranc
Y Company. Neumann and Whiting
Creighton. for plaintiff, Dare for dc
fendant
y Wong See VS.. All Chew. Damage
f Castle for plaintiff,
BANCo HEARINGS, MONDAY, JANUAR
S 10, AND TUESDAY, JANUARY II.
: Peterson VS.. Lazarus, appellan
Equity appeal. Thurston for propt
e nent Bickerton for appellant.
Hiilawe VS.. Kalua, appellant. Al
P peal en- demurrer. Neumann and MOI
i sarrat for prepayment, Kinney & Pete