Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1886-05-05
SUPREME COURT.

SACRAMENTO. May 4, 1856.
Court met at 10 A. NJ. in regular session. Pres
1 ent-MorrlsOn, c. j., presiding; McKinstry j. =:
Myrick, j.; Finkler, Bailiff; Spencer, Clerk.
The following list of applicants for admission
to practice We're examined in open Court by
Chief Justice Morrison touching their learning
duly admitted TO practice in all the Courts of
this State: J. W. sullivan, Neville II. Castle
Charles +. Conlan, Charles ;. Wheeler, James
| W. Bartlett, James F. Farraher.
Justice Thornton examined and passed the
following: Amos II. Carpenter, Edward L. Cat
I lin f.. A. Kelley, Henry P. Dimond, j. W.
Hughes.
Court met at 10 A. NJ, May 4, 1856, in bank. for
the regular session. Decentralization, C. j.:
McKinstry., j.; Mckee, J.; Thornton, J.: Sharp
On motion of a. l.. Hart, and the presentation
of license from the Supreme Court of the state
of New York, as evidence of good moral char
acter il was ordered that Frank IL Hvat, be
and is hereby admitted to practice as an attor-
pey and counselor in all tthe Courts of this
State.
2O,099-People VS.. Lampson, 20l2i-People VS..
Phillips-Ordered submitted on briefs on file
20,l6s-People VS.. January, 20,lS2-People vs.
Macenanay ct al.-Qrdered continued to July
calendar, 1886.
velle-Ordered continued to October calendar,
1886
IL .4Sl-Ash VS.. Board of Supervisors of Colusa
contradiction by Bayne for RESPONDENT 10
dismiss writ, ordered submitted Further or
dered, return be filed without prejudice to mo-
ton to dismiss. Petitioner allowed % DAYS to
file brief respondent 20 days to reply petitioner
10 days TO reply thereto, cause to be thereupon
submitted.
20,150-People VS.. Pacheeo-On motion of Bur
chard, ordered respondent be allowed Il DAYS TO
file brief cause 10 be thereupon submitted Fur
ther ordered, counsel tor respondent be allowed
to withdraw record for seven days.
20,l77-People VS.. Brown and Weie-Ordered
referred to the Commissioners for oral argIl-
ment at date to be fixed by counsel hereafter.
20,l96-People vs.. Scott-On motion of Deputy
Attorney-General for respondents, and being no
appearance or points and authorities ON file for
appellant, il is orderedthat judgment and order
be and the same is hereby affirmed
A,l97-People VS.. Sam Lung-0n motion of
Soto, ordered respondent be allowed five days
to file brief; cause TO be thereupon submitted
catastrophe VS.. CaTolan-Continued
2O,2O-Peopie VS.. Reed-On motion of Edger-
ton, ordered appellant to be allowed fifteen
DAYS to file brief; cause TO be thereupon sub
mitted
20,2Ol-People vs. Lowry-On motion of Rust.
ordered appellant be allowed fifteen days to file
brief respondent ten days to reply; cause there
upon TO be submitted.
2O,!5O- People VS.. Hor-On motion of Deputy
attorney General, ordered appellant be allowed
hve days to file brief, respondent five days to re-
ply; cause to be thereupon submitted.
20,14l-People VS.. Otto-On motion of W. H.
II. Hart, lcr respondent, cause ordered submit
ted upon briefs on file.
In the Tyler disbarment ordered referred to
Supreme Court Commissioners Searls to take
May D, 1856.
Ward VS.. Mathews-Motion by Reardon to ad-
vance cause submitted. Motion denied.
ll,5l0-Cross vs.. Bristo- Motion to dismiss APP
peal argued by Taylor for respondent, Arm
strong for appellant, and submitted Appeal
dismissed without preiudice
p, lg-PeoDle VS.. Jung Quang Sing-On mo-
Ton OF Burchard, ordered that the Clerk of the
Court below send to this Court a certified
copy OF all minutes herein. Further ordered
cause be submitted upon briefs on file.
Adjourned to ?. NJ. tomorrow