Butte semi-weekly miner. [volume] (Butte, Mont.) 1886-1890, 1886-06-26
IRELAAD,S FRIENDS AND FOES,
John Bright Sends an Address to thu
Anti.Home Rule Electors Of
Rockdale., 3. =
Gladstone Meets With N ()iation m
Delivers an Address = TIE Rse- y.
!. pie Of 9lassoY.s -;
Harrington Forces Certain AnsadlasatS
to the Eleetiea Bill Ia the - =
Hopss q Lords. 4

4 mally replied TO the tender. OF resolutse
of the Rockdals Conservative Associate
: thanking linn for having assisted to def
the Home Rule bill. He says in his rsp
II am sorry there should be any party
the country ready to accept these hills!9'
The Marquis Of saliabnzys In tho Hos
q OF Lords last evening opposed the Rascto
bills because OF the objectionable hatare
!. certain clauses introduced into it after n
. Gladstone had promised that contantto
matters should be avoided during the. 1
mainder Of the session." These claus
were those introduced by Labouchere q
, Earl Of Kimberly and the Secretary Il
India. 1t was then agreed to withdraw Il
Objectionable clauses in order to save tin
by preventing return Of the bill to Il
Commons. The lords then road the bill
second time. s77-I s
GLADSTONE At GLASGOW.
i GLASGOW. June 22.-The arrival of NJ
and Mrs. Gladstone here to-day was Il
signal for a great demonstration. Thou
ands OF people had awaited at the static
to greet them and when they alighted fro,
the train and entered their carriaee, the
were cheered and cheered again by the e1
thusiastic multitude. HeSRler's circus /
was packed from floor to ceiling. Gilbes
eth, M. p, for Central Glassow wa
Chairman Of the meeting. When tho PIT
mier and his vile and Lady Aberdeen en-
tered the building they met with q hurri
cane Of applause. Tho audience san
nAuld Lang syne" and Hes Jolly Goo,
Fellow" = =.
Mr., Gladstone. upon rising, said he wa,
confident that Glasgow would do true ant
sOlid Liberal work at the coming election
He would to-day deal with portion o
the great question which had hitherto
been untouched, that portion which pecu
!iarly affected Scotland. He would TAXI
his text rom the famous DR.. Chaluiera
who in 1918 referred to the impoesibility
OF crushing the Irish people and added that
the almighty arm OF Kindness would be
irresistible" (cheers) Those words, the
speaker said were words of high christian
wisdom and he asked his auditors to an.
pro ch the question inspired with such
sentimento. He wished to deal with three
points: The security of Protesta,.ts in
Ulster, arguments deduced from the union,
at Scotland and England and the question
OF Home Rule for Scotland. (cheers). He
denie that under the Home Rule bill Ire
land would be an independent country.
There ' ere clauses that forbid Ireland to
legislate for restablishmentor endowment of
any religion. The Parnellites joyfully accep-
ted the clauses and they had always proved
they were in favor OF religious freedom,
besides the Royal veto would remain,
therefore the alarms were groundless and
frivolous. Lord Harrington complained
that he made no advance on the Ulster
proposal in the original scheme; well, Lord
Harrington made no effort to help to 10
so; again, Maj. Saunderson in behalf of the
Orangemen advanced the view that the
majority of the Irish should be compelled
to adopt the will of a small minority. Mr..
Parnell wanted the assistance of
every lrishman in the work of
Ireland. The Government
was open to consider every reas-
enable proposal If such could be
devised, for the purpose OF giving separ
ate satisfaction to that portion OF Ulster
nut fears that Catholics would persecute
5he north where the Prostestants wore
strong enough to protect themselves were
lutte baseless. The union Of England and
Scotland was essentially different from that
II England and Ireland. The fundamental
Inference was that Scotland was always
lble to hold her own. Scotland met Eng
and on footing of equality and the union
With the lapse OF time, commended itself to
he minds and hearts of Scotchmen whilst
he entire Irish nat tion was AGAINST the union
II that country with England. Now he had
aid that Scotland had become gradually
atisfied with the union, but if q majority
II the people of Scotlond wished to man.
lid they think if they arrived at q clear
to that effect, thatif of seventy
wo Scotch members of the House of Com
nous sixty united in demand for q change
hat England would dare, or wish to refuse
hem7 [Cries of mo, no."l
He ridiculed the proposals of the National
Radical Union to leave undealt with the
question Of Irish local self-government, q
ubject that was ripe for discussion, whilst
he country dealt with q local government
or England and Scotland, question which |
vas not ripe for discussion. Mr.. Gladstone
hought this proposal castiron. Uniformity
Il institutions for England, Scotland, Ire
and and Wales was bad. false and vul-
ar principle. In dealing with the subject
i local government the special wants OF
he different people must considered
md the special history OF those
'eople. The main question was whether
reland was to have free government or be
'ver.ridden by England and Scotland.
They know now what Ireland wished.
reland had not asked for an innovation,
,ecause she had q Parliament until it was
AIKEN from her in 1900 by a mixture of
raud and force. She only said: In Gods
lame as you have failed allow us to endea-
,or to govern ourselves" Scotland, the
peaker continued, had always sent reform
rs to reform Parliament, would she do SO
gain? [Cries 'yes."] Or would she send
II she chose the latter
curse tho responsibility would be hers,
lot his. In conclusion Mr.. Gladstone
appealed to his auditors to give their
,oice in favor Of peac.' and justice. His
closing words were hailed with loud and
prolonged cheers. Il
Karl Blind writes that the whole future
II ENGLAND is at 81 AXE in the present crisis.
He declares that the handing of the govern
nent uf Ireland to men, whom MIR. Glad
stone described as sworn enemies OF Eng
and, means danger to England and ruin to
Ireland. He cons :ders the policy OF Bright,
darlington and their followers alone con-
,istent with the safety Of the nation.
UNIoNIsr MEETING.
There was large Unionjst gathering at
Paisley, Scotland, to-day. Lord 1ddle-
berph addressed the meeting. He urged
that the Scotch compel Gladstone to die
tinctly answer whether the Land Purchase
bill would or would not be brought forward
again.
PRESS COMMENTS.
The telegraph contrasts the speech made
bv John Morley. chief secretary for Ireland
With those made by Gladstone and says
thev are antagonistic. It adds-i the
memhers OF the cabinet delay arriving at
aome aereement on the issues of the cam.
naien there will be jutiication for the be-
';ef that the members OF the government
Isoa sAAs's ..-.~.A:>- - tho po1irv