Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1886-04-27

rorsrnners nay Be controlled ~ fca
u their oEr fneerezt.
II YseR q FL tne iscts an ST. q q
besief.
I. Th.t sae state rgserznse-t & s.rsrl
KNs0ncE THE LAWS
for Ire prCfscftoz u Tsrzont ard Ffoferti
Il - borders.
That Is . she excessive preroEaiiT'
q tas state goyerrrse-t 20 make ard e.
foTce surh i&Es-
3 That tie eoctrsre q ccate-1y'tS an
eceirersaips has been extended unii
t5er are s1brerslTe q s.A5s riE1is and
1foEescrs 20 ne liberties q the reo7se-
3. Tat labor. - fsgrese1ied - ~
Hnizhts of Labor and t1e t4r8ers' ALI.
a1ce. has TIE sane rfzht - crgEniKs A.
cAr.iAl has. sd, 50 i0oz a. tsese orgEri-
zttt1zs Do rot 81 overt acts violate per-
sg81l sud proF%rty rtgaiH, i1At neiiiieE
tie courts r.gT 1fAer classes Of society
have 2sy Tiz1t 70 complain
3. Inst there ssoulf BE FEWER U1ited
States courts EzS r-Ars1Gis.
6. TAI t1s STATE ara federal govern
nsnis s5ouid, ezeh within
Tzs coEsIETr-TioSAL E1oErTrs
-i+---a-- 1871 ~ EA-a-- ~--------t
fsncfic-s.
=. Tat a eczerrnsut Nsers TIE people
arr controlled - q FAR e the influence
o. centralized poTsr = no republican
xuTernueEt
The erer1aearaenss II federal poEer
sa0zlt - eFsz more gpiekly and en-
phxtie4iiy pr0sessed Agzirss when 4 poT-
ton q tie administration Of iustice Il IL
The h4res Of he Democratic parry. Lo-
cal Disturbances should 1gs Be nzgnife5
into revolutionary movements, 20 be sup
pressed b. that poEeF which = rtserTed
for great social emergencies.
81 4 safe 70 yretics that Il ussuy judges
PIT into Practical eject The law q cen
temDfs, a. announced in the recent opin-
ion, there will Be such :
WHOLESALE IMPEACHMENT
Of judges - has never been seen IN any
country. The repeal OF mobilization Of
secr.on rs, Eniied States Revised Stat
utes. Will - al issue In the near future,
for there "a no statute, even In Engianf,
that cO1id be used 80 easily 10 the inter
est 81 tyranny and oppression Oar state
government Is based on "a abiding conf
dsDce IL the virtoe and loyalty Of local
authority and citizenship, and II was
never contemplated that the reserve force
would be used except ia cases where
these primary forces were pOwerless.
In your editorial criticism you sag;
'sThe people demand Gud require gov
erDment AID protection, and are not par
ticEiAT whether the person who executes
the lAw Il q sheriff or UnIted States
II you are correct in your conclusion rs
10 the condition 81 public opinion, ma
iOTiiy % ibis people don't believe iu re.
pubi.csn institutions and o. course VIII
not csgs how soon the rlghts, du les and
DrerVgatiges q the state sre observed by
me federal Judicial and executive powers.
II you are correct In this suTmise, Il IS
somewhat remarkable thst we haze in this !
Stale q Democratic majority which never
ails 30 convention assembled 10 declare +
u favor Of local self government
You state that ''the sovereignty u the 1
tate Is being friltered away because the ]
,filcials viii not exercise their power aud I
ticker aud daily With law breakers and 4
mDbsn
Il these charges be true, why not state +
he time end place Of their occurrence and Z
lemand az Impeachment ii the officer I
guilty Of such reasonable conduct? The 4
aW provides severe penalties Tor al such 4
,fiici4l neglect Of duty, and unlike the fed I
raj law Of contempt, Furnishes under
statute.
Specific charges sustained BY q clean-cut
Ilaiemeuts Of facts would induce cor
'ectiye action on the part OF the people,
7aile charge made generally and unsup.
Jorted by testimony will make no i'm.
unless Il be uniaycrAkle TO the
Ournal making IL
II you believe thEt any state officer had
.dlckered and dsllied with a mob aud
aw-breakers,n you should ran for the
legislature Just 10 get sn opportunity TO
refer articles OF Impeachment against
i'm but do not consent 70 see the peo.
les right 81 sclf-goYernment taken from
hem or the form OF government changed
ec4use OF the dereliction Of duty on the
art OF one or dozen officers.
will build my reputation as prophet
n the one prediction that, before the
rost falls, the people OF Texas will have
10 say that will convince you
hat they see a difference between laws
nforced BY sherifts and laws enforced by
jnited States marshais
"1ou are at the head OF great corpora-
lon yourself, and II seems that all cor.
oraie interests consider they have com.
lon cause 10 centrslIzing power. They
onnd government weak or corrupt
uough TO grant them exlra0rdinary frau
hises and subsidies, aud seem now 20 be
ngaged In forcing the people to consent
q government weak enough TO Weld to
hem In their every demand. II society
ouscntS To the sOundness and practical
peration OF Judge Pardee's opinions,
atifed by yourself and other leading
il simply means the peonage
Z labor, and that our government shanl
My live as machine to opera.e corpor-
te interts tsn
There Is A vast difference between
protecting property by the
fdlnary process OF law, aud In placing 1t
a the hands Of It's courts by stretching {
he doctrine Of receiyerships, for the pug
ose Of delaying aud virtually defraudipr
mail creditors and damaae-claimants.
M rebuilding and operating the road for
be benefit Of its bOndhnlders.
There Is also a vast difference he.
ween Furnishing Individuals FOR ,kIllinen
ngiues and otherwise interfering with
roperiy rights by overt acts OF violence,
nd In announcing from the bench that
loortng men by merely organizing and :
uiiting work, for these creatures az the 3
ourt lay themselves liable 10 severe pun.
.hufNnf Tor an a.. a. 4