The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1886-03-27
THE RECORD OF THE COURTS.
Emitted States District Court.
hon. w. A. Woods. Judge.
To-day-No special call.
Supreme Court.
hon. w. e. Niblack. Chief-justice.

Supreme Court.
Hon. w. e. Eiblack. Chief-justice.
The following decisions were rendered March
g.
12367. John r. Freeman vs. Sarah j. Paul
Vigo G. c. Affirmed. Elliott, Jill When
bill to review will not lie even though the prayer
for relief in the complaint filed in the original
action is not broad enough to cover the relief
granted (2.) A defendant cannot escape the
consequences of his neglect to appear when sum
moned, upon the ground that the recital did not
fully inform him Of the nature of the action, or
correctly describe the relief sought
l2455. VIM. Beatty VS.. Michael O'Connor ct
al Marion S. c. Reversed collars. J.-Ac-
ton to set aside judgment a. While the
statute does not, in words, say that the court
shall relieve party from default taken against
him through his mistake, etc, that, however, is
clearly implied. e. Where bill of exceptions
shows that "the foregoing afidavits contain all
and the only evidence adduced for and against
the said motion to set aside the Judgment here
In" it sufficiently shows that this was all the
evidence given. r. For circumstances consti-
tuting excusable neglect under the statute, see
opinion.
1911. Thomas Murphy VS.. The State. Owen
c. G. Reversed. Niblack, G. Jan Indictment
charging that ION the 10th day of August, 1884
ETC., is bad, the date being impossible and sub
sequent to the return of the Indictment.
1923. VIM Dant vs. State. Knox 9. G.
beer on Sunday, and the barkeeper draws it
from keg and hands it to the customer, who
drank without requesting it to be given to him,
or paying for it, having it charged to him, his
habit usually being to drink beer there and pay
ing at the time for it, the transaction imports a
sale and not gift, and there is violation Of
Section 2098 e. There is no material vari-
apce where the indictment charges that it was
lager beer, and the evidence shows that it was
beer
10s2S George Wiley VS.. State ex REL John
Brown, auditor. Lake G. c. Affirmed. Howk,
j. The evidence sustains the verdict.
Superior Court
Room l-Hon. Napoleon b. Taylor Judge.
To-day-Call: Laura Winsch VS.. George
Winsch.
Room 2-Hon. d. W. Howe. Judge.
To-day-Milan ct al vs.. Harmoning. contin-
ues on trial.
Room s-Hon. Lewis @. Walker. Judge.
Yesterday-Ch B. Fletcher VS.. William
e. Spahr ct al; suit on note. Dismissed and
costs paid.
Mary j. Wolf VS.. Rudolph Thiecke ct al. fore
closure. Court makes special finding and con-
illusions of law thereon.
Rider Engine Co. VS.. r. r. Rouse; account.
On trial by court
To-day-No special call
NEW SUITS.
Room mo 35254, Jerome B. Knapp, Lizzie
s. Knapp, his wife, vs.. George Kimmick and
Kate C. Kimmick. his wife, Edward Earl, Naoma
Earl, Charles l. Earl, The Star Saving and Loan
Association
Circuit Court-4l5s, Shewalter. Hanlin g. Co.
VS.. David Long, administrator of Andrew May;
claim. 4l57, Theodore P. Haughey, trustee VS..
Joseph w. Smith, Charles S. Boynton and Daniel
NJ. Ransdell; notes. demand Sc, O00 4156 Charles
c. Koerner VS. Richard M Smock; appeal from
j. M Johnston, j. p, to the Circuit Court of
Marion county, Indiana.