Los Angeles daily herald., 1886-04-08
SUPREME COURT.
Los Angeles session.
WEDNESDAY,, April 7, 1886.

IN BAkC.
Court met at 10 M. Present, Nor
rison. c. j., presiding, Mckee. j.,
Thornton, j., Myriek, j., Sharpstein, j.,
Ross, j., Williams, Clerk, Finkler, Bail
iif.
2O,l76. People VS.. Kellogg = Upon
the suggestion Of the appellant herein by
counsel, it is ordered that the appeal
herein be dismissed.
2O,l7S. People VS.. Kuapp-0rdered
continued to July calendar, 1856
20, $50 People VS.. Daniels-Argued
by Coffey for appellant. Ordered ap-
pelIant be allowed ten days to file brief,
respondent ten days 10 reply, cause TO
be thereupon submitted.
20,lS2. People Va. Macenany-or-
dered continued to May term. 1886
20.124. People VS.. Phillips--Same
order.
20.l92. People vs.. Jung Quong Sing
Same order.
20,i60. People VS.. Escalante-0nmo-
ton of Deputy Attorney General and
there being no appearance or points on
file for appellant, ordered that the judg-
ment and order herein be and the same
! is hereby affirmed.
20,l69. People VS.. Rodrigo-On mo-
ton of Foley for appellant cause ordered
submitted on briefs on file.
0,l70. People We. Manners Argued
by Gage for appellant. Ordered that
appellant be allowed ten days to file
briefs, respondent ten days to reply and
cause to be thereupon submitted. 1t is
| further ordered that counsel forappellant
l. II -. l. "A rA fnu fs...
days.
20,lSS. People VS.. Meyers-0n mo-
ton OF Deputy Attorney ordered
that respondent be allowed ten days to
file brief, appellant five days to reply
and cause to be thereupon submitted.
20,l90. People vs.. Mccoy
that respondent be allowed ten days to
file brief and cause to be thereupon sub
mitted.
2Ol93. People VS.. Kong Sing-on
motion of Hendricks, and being nc
points or authorities on file for appel
liant, ordered that the judgment and or
der herein be and the same is hereby
affirmed.
1919. Anderson VS.. Black-Motior
to dismiss appeal by Rolfe for respond
emit substituted. Motion denied.
Admission of John @. Winslow-OI
motion of G. Wiley Wells, ESQ.,, and
presentation of license from the Supreme
Court of New York, and evidence o.
good moral character, it is ordered thai
John G. Winslow be and is hereby ad
mitted to practice as an attorney AND
counselor in all the Courts of this State
Admission OF James M. Damron-OI
motion of Walter Van Dyke. Esq. and
presentation of license from the State OF
illinois. and evidence of good mora
character, it is ordered that James M
Damron be and is hereby. admitted &c
practice as an attorney and counsellor in
all the courts of this State.
Admission of Weed J. Chef-On mo-
ton of U. P. Coarey, Esq, and presen.
tation of license from the University OF
Louisville, and evidence Of good moral
character, it is ordered that Weed j.
Chef be and is hereby admitted to prac.
tice in all the courts of this state.
Admission Of James T. Scarborough
On motion of J. d. Bicknell, Esq, and
presentation OF license from the Supreme
Court of the State of Texas, and evil
dence Of good moral character, it il
hereby ordered that James L. Scar.
borough be and is hereby admitted tc
practice as attorney and counsellor in al
the courts of this State.
Brown VS.. Plummer-0n motion Of
White for respondent. ordered that the
appeal Of January 2sth, 1856, be and
| the same is hereby dismissed.
Brown VS.. Plummer-Motion to dis
miss appeal Of March LIST, 1856, herein
argued by White for respondent, Baxter
for appellant, aud submitted.
1924 Perry, Woodwork & Co. VS..
Brainard-0n motion of Stephens for
appellant and statement that cause hav-
ing been compromised and settled and
by consent of counsel it is ordered that
the appeal herein be and the same is
hereby dismissed.
Recess.
Adjourned until 9 A. NJ. tomorrow.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
April 7, 1886.
III sos. Thorne VS.. Finn - Ordered
that all proceedings in the cases of the
Savings and Loan Society VS.. Susan L.
Thorne pending before said Judge and
court be stayed till 80 days after the
date Of filing the opinion of said court.
And 1t is further ordered that the
Sheriff OF the city and county of San
Francisco do stay further proceedings
under the writ issued in the aforesaid
cause until 30 days from and after the
filing Of the opinion of this court in the
above entitled action.
THORNTON, j.,
MCKEE, j.,
SHARPsTEIN, j.
SET FOR THURSDAY.
1924. Perry. Woodwork L Co., ap-
pellants, VS.. Brainard ct al. respond
ents.
993s. Bath. appellant, VS.. Valdez.
respondent.
9979. Lewis, appellant, VS.. Adams,
respondent.
1890. Cox ct al, respondents, VS..
EiOugh appellant