Los Angeles daily herald., 1886-02-18

themf Why are they not brought here
Why are not their dispositions. here
They were respectable people; they
were honorable people. II they were
not they would have been produced here
and the testimony OF the slave Colbert
would not be left to stand alone.
Where are the Misses Babcocki
Where is Miss Broderick, He has moi
brought them because he would not ties.
tify in their favor. He says Louise ac'
knowledged she was not engaged. She
may have said so. l do not think she
taid it, for Louise says she did not, but
i she said it it is very natural thing.
1t proves our theory Of the secret
agreement. Miss Lulu Drum was taken
up and her testimony gone over. She
did not play with Mr.. Baldwin's Eve
year old child. She was with Mrs.
Hunter all day. II such conversation
as that ALLEGED took place, il was part Of
the original plan to ruin this plaintiff
This girl Drum had been instructed to
III out this denial OF the engagement
and 1t vas part Of the original copspir-
acy. The little girl tells the story Of
what happened three years ago. Lulu
Drum tells what Louise said. Baldwin
calls it up at the table and taxes Louise.
She hesitates, and then it Ia alleged
Miss Louise said no." and burst into
tears and vanished from the room.
Such a conversation never did take
place, but Il il did 1t was only natural
from the agreement made that she
should not tell it. Where is Miss
Broderick who was there and heard
this conversation. He has seen
her within the past six weeks.
Mr.. Wells was In San Francisco
It Is probable he oonsulted Miss Broder-
ick and that her testimony would not
suit them. Why did they have the tes-
timony Of child when they might have
had that Of young lady! 1t never
took place. II was put up job. he
tried here to build up story to defend
him If he ever was sued. Miss Perkins
has no money to make case suoh as
she conld had she money. We never
knew until few days ago that Colbsrt's
testimony was to be introduced; we
could not get the testimony of the 9th.
ers. Why does he rely on one witness
when he might have had that of the
othersi
49, IN, not ,,srr;t Of furtb.r ra.
s:-fst IT.. .isc,. 80.
Pr =. M q - ~ ,,a;,t
'A'r o.,'sn S =. =. ss.s;, ,o,s pv'a 3d.
up and the testimony Of witnesses re-
viewei claiming that the story of the
witnesses for the defense must be
untrue. The attorney spoke in all for
three hours and thirty minutes. The
q 10 the Cotton House and IT. reputa-
ton was reviewed. The Testimony Of
witnesses for the defense was also zone
over and the claim made that thew ali
testified TO a story repeated by each and
avery one Of them.
M coxmus,ox
III. .o,n.al sa;d. Won sra ..kad n
sd;r Ice this g;rI q prost;tute. fb.t II Ia
49, aon,rsot h wss ;,s,ifad n
hrssS;nr n hscsnss he fon,J shs vss
nnchssts. tbst bac.nsa ~ her sssco;s.
t;o.s r. ,v.s ;,,.t;ss ~ IN ths hrs.ch We
stsr5 ,na, az 800 - =. : IL rrssant.
ii - ~ var snd "a ssv ~ az entitlaJ
~ 1000 TIL rsItry mn, \ roth;rr
s..d - ~ n;nry dove sb;s ,;t.js
rs;rsJ e;r, IL var hsd q dsnobssr
wonid vau o;vs mn her name for All III,
go. W. sxrect ! vard;ct a. vonr
hsrds that viii IL an sYamnls II en-
sst,s-s - r;eh HART, a. whc nm .hort
49, Lure. ~ dshsucb vonr dsrsh.
~. We tncw ~ are srt;tled fo Il
TO-, -. a..;anr.4;a. III a. a;~o,,.r.
-. 49, my va -" - a.a s;nsia - ~
1855 se~; s;.,s a ;',i,;cs ~ ss "
p''s y. l1s'''
ARGUMENT fos The DEFENSE
Began a. 5:io ~ Coi. y whey Wein'
he said; shall De e. prici e. can IN
Justice 70 my client. In listening 70 the
speech Of the plsintins attorney w.s
reminded OF view IRON . mountain
top where All was must below untl tne
sun arose and disPeiied snat mist from
beginning 20 END ms argument consissea
In mystIfying the record 30 mucn tnat
nothing but the sunlight OF tratn can
dispel the mystincation thrown around
the evidence by the attorney am not
here TO be called aside ~ sias isaues; !
am not mere 70 champion immorsnty
nor to condone wrong l am mere ~
sworn attorney 70 reAon luss'ee ~ .n's
case. Inc fact OF tnefe peing
here beautiful and poor young g'ri
on one side and an OLD ana ricn
man on the other mas nothing 70 40 Win
the case. and that the Court VIII IN,
struct you. We are mere almost -
charged with crime. Inere - strong
popular feeling IN thus case. y. y
always 80 IN case where on one sac =
eesnuiu, Young woman; ~ n,rd
case to defend because OF tnts Popuisr
feeling Inns y merely q case q o,sscn
OF contreos: 1ou arc ners Derey 20
Try IL on snat issue-so dessrnine u
there mas oeen suon oreson q con.
racs. and y there mas. now maen Pa
been the damage zone ~ tps. preach
meeting q tne pArHes' Sne was aoous
ioa years o.d, acc ,rding % Ine story 81
herself ana 81 ner motner, ne oniy
thing % snow tnis. pes,oea 'neir woru'
. the memoranaum DOCK o. ner Issnsr,
howing where ne was workinR ., tne
tims sns = alleged 70 nave nsen Doln.
there the iurtner meetln9s o. tne parties
and the visit 70 pan rrAncisco was TO-
viewed by the Attorney, ana sne'r
iurtner ineennes etHr nel return from
san rrapclsco aI.er tne nr:e vis,' g .nas
c.tyJ can your auension % 'ne iAos
tnat tnefe we're Consequences oo."een
ner evidence mere ana Una. gwen - .ne
ime Of ner deponsion oelors 1oLnnn.
s'onsr baxter. me p'cturs ssels "
nave osen reeoccnsa anu nneu Up 'or
thls second occasion, Inc WISH 20 tne
Baldwin ranon 10 reofuary' wnen sue
remained on the ranch all the time,
rarely returning home, was dwelt upon.
Her home was about 3 miles from