New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1886-09-04
MR. PARNELL TO PROPOSE A MEASURE.

DRAFTING BILL FOR THE RELIEF on LEASE
HoLDrRs-LABoUcHERE ATTACKING CHURCHILL.
LONDON Sept. Sin the House of Commons
this aftei Lord Randolph Churchill moved that pre-
ctdenee given TO the supply bills. Mr. Dillon moved
Mr. Parn Ellis amendment, urging that the consideration
OF the situation in Ireland admitted OF no delay. Sir
William Vernon Hsrcourt pointed out that If the
amendment should be carried 1t would be useless, as
the opposition pOwerless TO compel the Govern
ment TO introduce new measures now, therefore, he
would support Lord Randolph Churohills notion Sir
Michael Hicks Beach urged that end be put to the
discussion.
Mr.. Parnall said he did not blame Sir William Har-
court attitude by that genten but was
only by the persistent application OF the prncpie OF
TRY, try again that the Irish members ever got any
thing denied that the Irish party intended to OBJ
sruct the business OF this session. He was drafting
measure giving leasehOlderl leave TO apply TO the
fix fair rents, and wold advise the withdrawal
OF the amendment if the Government would give facil-
ties for the introduction of such bill at the present
session.
Lord Randolph Churchill replied that the Government
had already stated its intentions in regard TO the Lana
bill. II Mr.. Parnell desired to describe in fuller
the way in which he wished the question TO be
dealt with tile Government would undertake to give
special sitting for that purpose before the close OF the
session.
John Morley expressed himself as sincerely satisfied
with the Governments promisc. Mr.. Parners amend
Mr.. Labouchere moved an amen lment declaring that
Lord Randolph Churchls speech in Belfast was calcu
lael to provoke breaches OF the law and ought 10 be
withdrawn lie insisted that Churchill morally
answeraDle for the killing and woundiDg OF so many
persons in Belfast. Lord Randolph described tue
amendment vain attempt TO set net In the sight of
the bld. He treated with contempt Mr. Labouchere's
clumsy attempt aud faty refused 10 respond to the
challenge.
Major Saunderson moved amendment TO Mr..
Labouchercs amendment, denouncing the presence OF
British subjects al the recent Irish in Chicago
calling attention TO the statement freely made that
some COmmOneIs avOwed that they had taken tue
fenian oath and declaring that II this statement
tue the members in question should be severely
surei.
Lord Randolph Churchill said that the Government
would opIc cse both amendments The matters alleged
III Major SaundersOn ssamendmeDt, he said, in
wise pertinent 10 the Speech from the Throne and a
discussion OF the amendment wOUld only still further
waste the time OF tue House.
T. =. OCOnnor attacked Lord Randolph Churchill for
sinking reply 10 Mr. Labouchero. He taunted
Cburchill with having climbed into power the ladder
o. eostruction when there was danger OF a war with
ChurchFs tongue was not soencd by the pros pect OF
sacrhce OF thousands Of lives, and he did
BIS power TO thwart the efforts OF the Government,
G wniGn was surviving to maintain peace Churchilps
woius nave uone more TO and hatred
tween England aud Ireland ihan any occurrence in the
last two years" lCheers
pr: oaunaersons amendment rejected without
0IVsioh. MI LaDoueheres amendment was reec, ed by
evote OF 2oZ 10 il9 The House agreed to the re-
port of the address. Wv
Mr. Parnell hopes 10 introduce his land bin next week