Lexington weekly intelligencer. (Lexington, Mo.) 1871-1887, 1886-03-27
CIRCUIT Jul C
April Term.
lSr DAY-APRIL J, lSSG

3 Henry Goring VS.. Pat II. Lillis; appeal
motion for new trial and i'll arrest.
4. Columbus Dunn VS.. Noah p. Adams
ejectInent; motion Tor new trial.
5. Eiiz. b. Thomas We. Henry G.. Jones:
eiectmeni; continue l for argument.
q. Chas. z. Durant vs.. Lexington Coal Mining
Goa pany; damages; motion tor new trial and
IN arrest.
: VIM. Taubnan ct al VS.. City of LexIng-
ton; damages, mot ion for new trial and IN
arrest.
s. Elizabeth Il. Ferguson VS.. Anna NJ, smith
eJectm mt; taken under advisement.
3 A. j. Horn VS.. J b. Merrel ct al; appeal.
coDstable's report flied.
10 State ex rel, Blackwell ct al. VS.. j. W.
Branch; quo warrantO; amended m3tion for new
trial.
IL. Robt, Pool VS., Mary j.. Scott ct al: motion
TO quash execution.
IL. Emma PediicOrd, administratriX, VS.
missouri Pacific Railway Co.; appeal. motion
ior new trial and In arrest.
IND DAY-APEIL6 Il.
Ii. Mary f. Adams ct al va. Phoebe A. Dunn
II. james d. Ish VS. Mary Hanley ct al; par
ttlon; d, attn Of Rice suggested.
10. Dayld ID. Silver VS. Missouri Pacific Rail-
way Company; damages, continued generally.
l6. Robert Z. Greer vs.. j. W. Foster:account
continued at defendants cost.
Il Bank of Odessa vs.. Elizabeth Jennings,
adIninistratriX; damages, appearance enlere 1.
Is. Arthur G.. Sparks vs.. VIM. D.. Rankin;
da nages.
BIRD DAY-APRIL Z.
10. J. D.. Briggs VS.. James F.. Hall ct a.;
contract, continued at plaintIff's cost.
20 Arabella &. Haiukel VS.. Lexington Ferry
Coal anu Transportation Co; dover: leave 10
file amended petition.
q Mary Laughlin ct al VS.. VIM. IL. Eggles-
ton; replevin.
-, Elvirl J. Norris VS.. Browning s. Glover;
appeal.
%: D. A. Hancock vs.. Lexington Savings
Bank: appeal.
"a. Mary Laushlm ct al vs. Lyons g. Hogans
trover and conversion, motion to sue AS poor
person.
4rH AY-APRIL 8.
p. Mary Laughlin ct al VS.. Lyons 4 Buford
truver and cOnyerslon; motion to sue US pOOl
person.
26. Andrew Moore ct al Va. Andrew Boutin;
from Jackson county.
p N. .. Nelson Manufacturing Company VS.
Lexington Water Company; account, answer
filed.
%. David Russell VS. James E. Hall; appeal
Railway Co appeal.
30. Thomas j. Armstrong vs.. School District
No. 8; reversed and remandcd.
9Th DAY-ApRIL 8.
81. American Bank vs.. l.. w, m
agent, ct al; note, leave to file answer.
30 Moline PlOw Co., VS., Geo. W. Avery; 9
notes. answer and reply filed.
33. Missouri and Kansas Manufactur ing Co..
VS.. Lotion + White; appeal.
"a. James r. Brown vs.. Perry Latham; APP
peal. replevin.
81. Madison Clen.mens VS. Mary A .Clemmens
divorce.
SO. Henry Elan vs.. Missouri Pscihc Railway
Co. appeal.
9Th DAY-APRILl 10.
81. Emma Glover ct al VS.. Susan Oh, a,ham
ct al; note, reversed and remanded,
3S. Moli;e A. Collins VS.. Homer L., Collins;
divorce.
80 Harry P. Murray VS.. F. M. Shore;
appeal.
40. Elizabeth R. Ferguson VS.. John r.
Smith; ejectment; answer and reply filed.
Al: Jennie Williams VS.. John Il. Long; dover
etc. answer fled.
Il. VIM. o Malcolm vs.. Robt S. Hammonds;
appeal.
7TH DAY-APRlL IL.
43. d. G. ImbOicn VS. John &. Hope; replevIn;
Al. Evily Surber vs.. Missouri Pacific Railway
Co /; appeal
40 Mprv shelby ct al vs. Philip johnson ct al
for distribution OF money.
AZ. Hannah Waddrll ct al VS. John F.. Wad-
dell ct al; partition.
II. Theo. Eoelecher We. Christ Echhof; eject.
nent, leave to fife amended answer.
43. Annie +. Peacock Va. Flavius e, Peacock
divorce. demurrer filed.
STH DAY APRIL l3
40. Susie w. Conkling vs.. Mark W. Conk
ing; divorce. default and continued.
so. Henry Thompson vs.. Charles Clayton;
replevin. demurrer to petition.
81. John Il. Chic Va. IL. g.. Cable Railway Co.
damages.
81. Emma T. Tebbs ct al vs.. Elizabeth Tebb
ct al; 10 correct deed.
5s. William Wnitehouse vs.. Zach Wright; re-
plevin, leave to file boni for costs.
81. Mary j.. Scott VS.. Frank L. Scott :divor &c,
answer filed,
9TH DAY-ApRIL IA.
s.. 10. ~ Wilson, administrator, VS.. Chas
Knipmeyer; account, answer filed.
So. 10. y. Wilson, administrator vs. Jno. II
knIpmeyer; account, leave to file answer,
81. Green d. Satterfield VS.. James c.. Harold;
money paid us security.
SO Green D.. Sitterield VS.. VIM. NJ. fl ,rp:
money paid as security.
50 Benz F. Ludlam vs.. Chas. Shaw: to re-
move cloud from title.
80. Mary A. Hefier vs.. John IIefter; divorce
default and continued.
81. Got,lieb Schieber VS.. Columbus Hicklin ct
III; partition.
~. Aana NJ. Graves vs.. Clarence Graves ct al;
psrtitiOn, continued for report.
%. WIN. L.. smith ct al Va. Georgia Graves
ct al; partition and dover for report,
IL. Catharine Heniz ct al VS.. Mary FInnegan
ct al; PARTITION
81. Albert q Wilson VS.. Mariah E.. Ricket ct
al; partition. amend, d petition flied.
III. RICE, Silk 4 Co. VS.. Thomas IL. Garne ct
al; account
e.. Harrison Machine Works VS.. B.. F. Wind
Gs Jonn II Fitzgerai ct at VS. Mary E.. Fitz-
gerai ct al; partition ETC., for report.
10TH IL.
80 Henry G Jones vs.. Howard Williams e,
al; equity, demurrer filed to petition
10 John Meyer Il Company VS.. Jno. G.
Barnes ct al: account. motion for costs and de-
murrer TO petition.
Il. Della Carpenter VS.. Isaac Carpenter; di-
vorce.
u. Elizabeth Mediation ct al VS.. C. & "A r.
Il Co. damages
a. SSuuSici AilhSotou W. vs. NliliaIns
Bros !; account
"A: Henry L Lunnam VS.. Geo. H.. Moore It al;
partition.
10 Am ,rican Bank VS.. George Ann VIM el
al; equity.
IS State use Lexington Savings Bank vs.. City
OF Lexington: mandainus, continued for reuort'
II. ERleline Merrei vs. A j. Horn ct nj; re-
plevln, answer filed and IN ,tion Tor costs flied.
IS. Alice Murray VS.. John D.. Murray; di.
vOrce.
10. Johr Z. Burden VS., Lee ID. Ewing; to Ill.
vest title.
80. Al, T Hartman VS. Lucicn NJ. Major ct al
note, attachment IN aid.
81 John W. Brown vs.. L., S. & l.. M. Major
mole, attachment in aid.
81. John Il LOngiOn vs.. l.. s. Nal or ct al:
notes, attachment in aid.
llTH DAY APRIL III.
50. J. E. l%Iayuer& Co. VS.. i ohm j. Brownipn
3 notes.
81. Elijah til Fltzsrral.et al vs.. City OF Lex.
lngton; IL warrants.
S.. Geo. W. Brown vs.. r.. NJ. Sparks ct al
note.
Sc. james F. Downing vs.. VIM. G. Arson
81 William Walker vs.. Frank Thornton
note.
IS. vii lie F. s~hockley ct al vs.. Jcrn Il. Mel
So. Theodore Bates VS.. Chas. f. Whitehous,
ct al; note.
80 James G. Kelly vs.. Richard M. Sparks
note.
81. James G: Kelly VS.. Richard NJ Sparks
account served.
81. john e. Diehl vs.. VIM. L. Catron ct al
9s Hereford & Francisco vs., Pnegcr & Thorn
ton: note.
81 Her ford & Francisco vs.. Thorn on 4
Moore; note.
50. Geo N. Haddix, administrator, VS.. Mad
dox Y Larkin; noe.
96 Sarah a. Taylor vs.. Alfred Ii Major e
al; note
81. Hall y Beiler vs., John Il. Matthews
noe.
IS. OF wine Bros. VS. Lohoefner & Teseler
| note.
80. Lexington Savings Bunk VS.. Sparks ,
Kelly; , notes.
100. Liam B. Shelby VS., Ftlnk Thornton
note.
lol Mary F. Lpckhirt We. Frank Thornton
2 notes
l02 Observation-Disclosures Rank vs.R l.. Gree
ct al; note.
l03. Morrison Wentwnrth Bank vs.. MAJOR ,
Benton; mole.
i2Tn DAi--APRIL Il.
| lH. Ezra }. : ni,h, administrator, vs.. WIN
Lowry, jr , notes and account.
| l05. Ezra j. Smith, administrator VS.. &. A
| Jones : notes ami account.
l6 John f. Hickam etai vs.. VIM. IL Dysart
3nOtes.
10. Beck Il Corbllt Iron Co. vs.. a. l.. Max
los. Isaac W. Av!tt vs.. Luclen 5. Major ct al
= notes.
| los. Louis Deutsch US. joseph IL. Wiley, az
count
no Geo. kurtz. interplead r in case of II q
Brockiofr against Emil Erchstadt vs.. Henry I
Brockhnf(; lnierpira
III. Ce". w Frambers, interplea,ier in cas-,
Of Ii. Z. ErO:kton against Emu Eichstadt, VS.
Henry G.. B.Ockh II; interpieL.
liz. Heisterberg ct al. interpieairr in case o
II. c.. Ii: Ockhou against Emil EIchstadt vs.
Henry Z BrOokhnn; int0rplea.
| liz VIM. Ii. Wilson, assignee of L.igh:ne
Bros. AS ignment.
ia. Clarence VivIon, assignee of VIM. z
Chapmani assignment,
ll5 n. T. Allison, assignee of Vaughan /