St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1886-12-10
Alexander Gum, respon dent VS.. John D.
PaakeS annaIant.

| Peakes, appellant.
| syllabus-A judgment of foreign court, COM
| plete and regular upon its face, is Prime tacie
valld Hence, a complaint upon such judgment
need not allege that the court by which 1t was
rendered had jur sdIction either of the cause or
| the parties. A fore IN Judgment may be proved
| BY cIpy thereof dul Ithentcated by the duly
authenticated cert ucItes OF officer properly
| authorized by law to give a copy. The clerk or
| prOthonOtary of court is presumed to possess
authority to make and certify copies of the
OF the co Irt in his keeping, and such cop es are
duly authenticated by his cert fcate over h. OIL
ciai signature and the seal of the court His Off
cial signature and the seal are duly authenticated
| Dy the great seal of the state or government IN
which the court IS f0undi affixed to the certificate
of the keeper thereof. the great seal proves itself
| A jud sment that an action for gwen cause "ba
dism ssed without pre- udce to another ;tion." is
by It's no bar to another action for the same
| cause. Whether the saving clause pr perly
or Improperly attached to the judgment IS not
portant. Judgment affirmed. BERRY, j.
Louis T. Stensgaard, surviving partner of the
late firm OF Stensgaard Il johnson, respond
ent, vs.. Tae National Fire Insurance Com
pany, appellant.
Syllabus-A building insured held upon the evil
dence to have been not ''vaca ed, unoccupied or
not in use'' within the meaning of the policy at
the time of its destruction by fire. Judgment af-
frmed. BERRY, j.
Frank Steele, Jr., respondent, VS.. Harry
Thayer ct. al, appellants.
Syl abus-New trail awarded for error in
clud material testimony BEhh1, j.
Note-We concur in the result arrived 1T in the
foregoing oplnion. MITCHELL. j.
VANDERBUKGH,J
Timothy Fl. Bliss, as receiver of the property
and estate of Pauline Graft, an insolvent
debtor, VS.. Will lam w. DJty and Pauline
Graf. appellants.
8 unbus-A re- yer appointed under section 2
of our insolvent act, may, under section 4, avoid
conveJ ances AMI pa. nents made and securities
given by his insolvent within four months of 5,
the receivers, appointment The order over
ruling defendants demurrer to the complaint is
accordingly affirmed BERRY, ].
G. Huutsman, respondent. VS.. Daniel Fish,
appellant.
syllaDus-A guardian of minors may properly
MAINTAIN an action to recover money collected
for her as guardian by attorney, notwithstand-
ing the fact that after the collection and Def q
the commencement of the action some of ti-
minors have become of age. Proof OF demand
III on such attorney for money 90 iected by him
dispensed with in such action when in his answer
the attorney alleges that he has applied the money
to the payment of ella h own favor aga n t
the guard ans. Before One's appoint N eut
as eu rdian he has no authorit to bind the estate
of those who subsequently become his ward. A
guard an is not liable vices rendered or ex-
the accounts OF the ad Illustrator of estate in
which his wards are interested. Order denying
new trial affirmed. BERRY, J.
Yesterdays BUSINESS.
The following was the business before the
supreme judges yesterday:
Thaddeus Fairbanks, Horace Fairbanks,