New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1886-01-26
THE RIGHTS OF OFFICERS AND CADETS.
DECISIONS Is TIE SUPREME COURT OF TIE UNIT


DECISIONS Is TIE SUPREME COURT OF TIE UNIT D
STATES.
WASHINGTON, Jan. 2j.-The Supreme Court
OF the United States today rendered the following dec
siOus:
No 9si The United statos ngt. Dewitt c. RedGraye'
appeal from the Court Of Claims. Eedrave In june
ISL graduated from the United states Naval Academy
as cadet engineer and detached from the academy
and entcrsd into active service. Up to August D. lsS2
lac the pay Of graduated cadet engineer anu
from that date June 80 lse3. when he was dis
charged pursuant the act OF August o. ISL lie only
received the pay OF naval cadet He brought suit III
the Cour, Of Claims TO the difference between
what he received and the pay OF cadet engineer IL
was contcudeI the part Of the United states That ny
virtue Of the provisions OF the act Of August ., lse2
Rcdgave became naval cadet being an undergraduate
al the time OF tho passage Of the act The Court OF
Claims decided Rci9raycs favor. and the supreme
Court OF the United states alirms that Judgment.
No CSC The I'ui,oi states against Lyman BPcrkins'
appcaI from the Court Of Claims THIS ease diners IRON
that Of grave only In that Perkn, claims pay "It'I
nj. discharrc protesting that tho order dscharRihg MN
W., ILLEGAL Tho question raised was that although tho
discharge may be justified 81 the act OF August D.
1850 the Secretary Of the Nayy had lawful power 10
discharge hin the service at VIII on tue srou'H
that he was an employe and not an officer Tue court
If Claims held that cadet engineers are officers ana not
employees and rendered Judgment In ieFknss iavo3'
, The supreme Court alirms that Judgment justice
! Matthew. de iycrcd the opinions IN both cases.
No 49, T. = Coe, plaintiff In error against the town
of Errol In error to the Surrem" Court OF e"-H""P
shire The paintin and others residents "t Maine ana
J,,s,clusctt. owned a large number OF spruce logs
that had been drawn down from Wrntworths place IN
TIauuslirc TO tic OF Enrol to be thence noated
down the Androscoecn River to the state Of Maine to
hc manufactured aud sold While tho logs remained at
lrrol the seectmcn of the town appraised them Tor
ga ,tien and assessed thereon state county. town and
oo taxes Another lot OF log, beloughg to Coo which
! Ia of
,1.ir ,av 70 f. vision Ne, and which detained
, town OF Enrol by low water were also assessed for
!aHes ING M plHp lmphire for an Sblcmemi OF taxos
mai court decided that lo tax hsrs'cd upon tho logs
me iogs cut In NcU-!iampshirc DO Sustained The pct
oncr took bill Of exceptions ahd upon VIII Oh error
.'ial the case to the Supreme Coirt Uf the Quilted
Stsie" I'm the case is whether the products OF a
.t u are Lle to be faxed like other property within
me etau[ r1Ily prepared for tho purpose by being
dsnos,tcd at place Of shipment, such products being
uWurd uy persons residing IN another stat Justice
ru actually launched gu It's way 10 another STATE or
committed TO con.non Garner lor transportation to
c.rtan Carrying It to the depot IS only AN interior
movement entirely within tue State anu only Tor the
nuruO.e OF putting lhio COHso V a''oi Is no
p , If The rxpornion itself Until shipped or started
par dnal Journey OF the state. is expectation is
- on i,S IN Derc and not all fixed and
Mn, Property thus situated he held can be taxed as
,yrG or assessed for taxation at tho usual time d
manner which such property IL taxed and not singled
..srsscd by Itself ut an unusual and cNcep-
% ,y lime because of its Destination II taxed IN the
usual that other similar ptoRGfy Is taxed ana
, W.. The tar IL valid These conditions having been
} Solnp s,T" Court Of Ncw,llanpsh-e Is affirmed
u p.cce M obercnner and others Palnn IN error ng
William u yP ssp State for tho Southern District Of Nc%
I'M Judgment revor CO with ersi' ana cause remandef
"ilG s' TIC United states appellant agt lyman Per
il lins, Hh iy Ni justice Matthews
e > ls2 10 S e 'Hrd%s our Of Tie refTrSy Of
III M hia" jndgmeit affirmed with costs opinion by sr
Il Jgs'T one Iroa silver Mining comp,nv plaintiff
u Tor AZ Ii'" 81 the dtcd District color
Do Crrn ,t, aT,ci Viz costs opinion by Mr.. justice
Ia Ter o, Jralg,lr. APP c!lant. act The District OF col
H. Maii"o% rDc RON toari OF 'anus Judgment affirmed
~ aGIPniry % MiG srr,goo and 0,,e,. n,
of ENm r. M"ion leave tie PETITION Tor Wit Of man
fn No Rsap2 aggeGn' as ans m rT "
OF o,e no so IGnion SAVINGS BlHr
Id rasr at Linus l1e receiver ETC. 80 200 he
In Gi,1ea%E;es 30 ChaTes MorsOn Appellant ast
nd Linus lGr; IT, Linus PIicc receiver etc No IA.
at narSeyy M taunton savings Bank pat Il
n aS Five as. nanE aptg
To uns Price recG'fI inns me- eic AGyanec,
@ Tor S ;%gf &s pnnn ast Of Ka Sal
Iacah v aud 9LcTs "a 81 I the hcsdS ~ C
ed ms, on Cutoi states appellant ngt Jung Ah un
70 aGy c9 m,le States plaintiff william Ran-chcr
lie 40 and assigned for argument on the first Monday
Asrc gu George OTIS plaintiff IN error agt The oIcgo
- I.V u drnlss submitted by eOfS
bc III Adams ~ support Vi '''''" ~ - $1,000 ~
thereto. ,-,ool mud Great Western Com
mo No. or o,iant ri the Phoenix Insurance company
ho pany APP % Iycrpoo and Great Western -tnam Con
~ NO OnnUDat agt insurance COMPANY OF Norl Amer
Ole P"y Million Tor cerIiOrafl snoInl'eH ny sofge
in- Adams IN support Oh ho''"" wv -
'ty opposition thereto error
md No. l.6yD 10 Mo,i1n 20 advance motion TO subn
the laryo a submitted by William Royal in support
vi, motions. ,,.,.ooo and Railroad Con
NO ,,,f m rrroI ngt GusttyHs Is ohle snnmltt =
,il, nv Hubbard rnd hAlcs taIk u
md undet ~ rrr and by Burdett for defendant IN eo
en- plhlh' ~ ttWnrl SicEney and OtlotH, hppcss -
mt, - sckney ON motion OF nonko ioa app 'Tan
Il sscd y th costs without preluJce an" NJ rcc
wIthdraw original transcript oil recoru vi ''A's W
red therefore. ,,,,ohou anpcllaut. Seth Wheelt
IN No l15-AIlrra Tor anoelnut ulsuissed with cos
-, vi UateErn the matter OF Wash LnhttoR: ~ corn
the MOTION "a 4 park for petitioner.
* ~, r,.,,os ,n uounced that tho Court would
re- Inc vi, Us. p.i,ruarv l. to the frat Monday
a., 1Varnh on motion OF Solicitor General 1oouo S ",
=" r. Trigg aud Johu A. Buchanan VI ADihsaoH' w. "