New-York tribune., 1886-07-22
snywbere ask Senator Camden to state whether that

--
Mr. Camden repeated the statement which he had made
wa frat called 70 hs attention. henouncip ,cious
false and wit out tho slightest shadow Of fo1ndaon
june find this extract, Three senators voted with
coal oil The Ohio members are incensed with ms a. nSs
Presidency" Lord did not know that over had any
70, tn. whs Tnsu r. "r sn
How Il il with my friend from Massachusetts tMr;
Ss M Ohsr T"% anas rsS friend from Maine ~
MI asead could not bully the three members OF tne
committed He would not say that he had been aple w
bully any OF them But he knew that these ,sn whom
a.ssad attempted to bully he could not bully ana ne
ueed try It. He (Nt Logan would sink IN MS piaco
before he would be driven by Hastead or anybody else
to do an act which would be 9nseseroqs nnkina ana
OF somebody for an-onth or two aud then DE RckeI
atterward: In conclusion he sai1 taat ne hnd peer, neen
aotuatsd In this not by impulse. not by being
aggrsvsd. by attacks. but by calm and denocrate
Of the and oi sne w ID ~ me sf s
action right and Just and proper lAppiause On he
door and in the galery.l
HISTORY or THE INvEsrIGATIoS.
Mr. Teller said that pcithor politics nor passion
shoald enter into the sdcration OF this subject No
more important question could be presented to the
American Senate than that involving the right OF a
n smber to his scat He would not allow the Senator
from Massachusetts, (Mr Hoar) by his inpassoned ap
pess in behalf OF pure elections to put him and his two
Republican the committee in the category
OF upon corruption WIN "Ppio""'"' A' "'''
unfair un.enaoral. unjudical. He was not on trial
He had defence to make, neither
10 tho people OF Ohio nor any other state.
Lat winter the Ohio D. published charges agalost
members of the LEGISLATURE who had also been menbers
OF the preceding Lesissture fhe Republican majority
charges worthy OF inquiry with reference to the
Senatorial question bnt as 10 the condnci OF thtr Own
members. The Investigation was confined excIusi,ey
The question OF the guilt or innocence OF these onr
msnbcrs aud after four weeks OF careful attention;
which the investgs gstion based was false
the to do with the question when ~ cahs 70 ne
senate Tho committee took up tne case WIN
the desire to do justice not simply "
the sitting member. but TO Ohio ana 10 Tue oehate an "
a. people OF the Land. The coDmlttc matter
took the testimony and carefully read 1t for himself
He that il did not arrive at ihc dignty OF owl
cd as psting against the sitting member
was absolutely destroyed When the chairnah lir
Hoar, TO the committee thai there was an ed
OF the case and the committee supposed their iaoors
ended gentleman appeared before then TOT ;ne pur
pose them that they ha1 erred Ia tner
( conclusions as TO what in proof Then the COM
niee considered the matter over again and majority
OF scyou out Of nine adhered to their first conclusion
Before report signed there went forth Iutnor
that sven members would rspo,t r acsinr az nac
their oaths seven men who by the p@itaty OF their
States elevated to the highest legislative bouy
In The world. Yet serni call for neWspa-
per in the State OF OHIO To compei the ect
ami Eenubcans to forswrar themselves and perjure
themselves th. interest of political success lie yield
ed o devosicn to Republican Prihciprs oul
he hat rather party should snk DOT oi sgnt than
believe tnat there were members OF the
senate who would thus stul,ify themselves even to
secure politieai ~ ono or esewEcrc
There was evidence inculpate ths sitting m-nber
and Senate was left with the ItTe question OF
law long since established that there INST be speehc
charges that "a change great cnonRh 70 Affect he
ultimate resuls sccCrol by Improper methods lie
had assumed for lie purposes OF TINS case mat ii ttr
mad been bribery the extent of changing the result OF
the election then the sitting member would lose ms seat
because tie Will of the people OF the state wOd not
have lawfully eXpressed; ana this was al There
was In the before the Senate
Mr. Teller proceeding u anaiyze the 1estinohy
in case but way TO motion to adjourn hoidng
the floor 10 conclude his remarks tomorrow