Daily Republican. [volume] ([Wilmington, Del.]) 1874-1890, 1886-02-02
Proceedings
Nv APrEkNOOS's seq.
HUTmFUL HURGLARs
POUND aUHkTN.
IBOUT A REAPER.


IAED POUND aUiLrr.
A REAPER
II med proceedings at 8 O'Clock
'nftsrnoon, with the Chief
|nnd associate Justices
|bogch. Several bills were
4 Grand Jury and, they re.
minutes after the opening.
|as drawn and the case OF
Iva. Frederick Brown and
|amilton, two small colored
Ed with burglary and lar
ken up foritrial.
1 was represented by Attor-
Il Paynta and the prisoners
Hayes, Esq.
Il ar opened by Mr.. Psynter,
kading the indictment and
Relation 10 the case, stated 70
hat he proposed to prove, and
b menced the examination
kates was sworn, and tesh.
resides at No. LAG Bird
lily. He kno ws the priso
bas seen them frequently.
.r l4th he was sent for by
soman, 70 the place where
10 come home, and upon
that during his absence his
len opened and robbed. The
N been unlocked and was
n the witness wife had
Eork and he had the key
the workshop, He after.
cred the key with which
ss opened there was q
lin Of socks, some dishes
r. takcn.
tes, Jr, testified that on
IL robbery he was going 10
Market streets, when he
ners, and Hamilton asked
d been home and missed
d upon his answering that
larded him a key aud told
b had been In the house,
bcked the front door with
eedbam was sworn. and
he resides at No 148 Bird
door to Mr.. Coates. The
e WAS robbed he was up
own residence, and saw
J coming out. He could
the date, but 1t was on the
lore Court commenced.
bmlth testified that he is O.
in this city; on Saturday,
b, ne saw q crowd on
bud learned that q house
ken into and robbed. He
hers on the railroad, and
them ior some distance
Eu and found q penknife
ergau on him, that were
hg, Coates as his property.
hamilton In the evening at
and found a number of
Esesslon.
Las, witness examined,
C aimed that the indict-
quasLed, on the ground
~ the prisoners with
the house of George
t had been shown on
Hon that the property
Up X. Lynch, and that
q tenant.
was overruled By toe
} case submitted to the
houi leaving their seats,
fdict of guilty. At the
u. Hayes the prisoners
banded to the custody Of
ntil the proper papers can
TO commit them TO the
b School.
d. NJ. Osborne & Co. vs..
chards was then taken up
fawn. The PLAINTIFF we're
by Lore and EN- mons, aud
mt by Anthony Higgins,
nit to recover on q promis-
pf Sl42 co, with interest
! lst, 1882, which with the
fotest, amounts to $50 20,
tai of SlSl 20. Hon. Charles
ed the note, aud said he
u the case without further
ps said this note was given
ment for o self binding
b the defendant had pur-
the agent OF the plaintiffs.
the machine for some
nt called aud asked for
machine, and when in
Richards that 1t would
represented, renewed the
ou they gave him two
which was for $l42. 80.
otes was payable In one
other in two years. The
B was thatif the machine
the defendant would not
"a to pay for it. Although
tlid not work, one Of these
"a, and the defendant now
paying the other, as he
achine il worthless.
Richards was sworn, and
ne Is a son of the de fend
Bher bought the machine
wen, at Chesapeake City /;
pa trial for one harvest, but
prk satisfactorily.
died, and Mr.. Boulden,
came for the notes in
tho machine. The witness
ould not work, when he
hey would give the notes
Or another harvest, they
, any money they might
the machine did not give
They had q great deal of
the machine, and Mr..
men there almost every
at 1t. In consequence Of
not doing the work proper
witness and his father to
expense In hiring hands to
It should have done. His
acres, and the witness
and the only way they
getting the wheat ont was
ls brother to come with a
machine. He again tried
s machine in his oats
pough he worked q half day,
lcceed In cutting one hum
hnd he threw 1t outside
hsre IL still remains.
ock Stephen b. Burleigh,
was declared forfeited nj
session, came In Court, &C.
y Levi @. Bird, Esq, who
Court that 1t WAS through b
andtng that he had not