The Daily bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Hawaii]) 1882-1895, 1886-09-27
HAWAIIAN JURY.

The King vs.. Kaai; manslaughter,
8rd degree.
Kila VS.. Kohiana, ejectment. j.
Austin for plaintiff.
Hiilawe VS.. Kalua, ejectment.
Neumann and Monsarratt for plain
tiff.
MIXED JURY.
Chapman VS.. Hawaiian Govern
ment, trespass. Dole and Thurston
for plaintiff; Acknowledgement for
defendant.
Ching On VS.. Amana, mesne pro-
fits. Kinney & Peterson and Magoon
for plaintiff.
Dole VS.. Parker, assumpsit. Dole
for plaintiff.
Alloy VS.. Kaulia, trespass. Kinney
& Peterson for plaintiff; Dare for
defendant. Jury waived.
FOREIGN JURY.
The King VS.. Dimond, man
slaughter, 2nd degree. Attorney
General and Ashford & Ashford for
the Crown; Dole for defendant.
The King vs.. Glendon, gross
cheat. Acknowledgement for the
Crown; Neumann and Whiting for
defendant.
McGrew VS.. Barnes & McCand-
less, damage. Dole and Neumann
for plaintiff; Brown and Kinney &
Peterson for defendant.
Kwong Fat VS.. Papaikou Sugar
Co., assumpsit. Neumann for plain
tiff; Castle for defendant. Jury
waived.
Cartwright VS.. Everett, assump-
sit. Whiting & Creighton for plain
tiff; Thurston for defendant. Jury
waived.
Buchanan VS.. Burgess, ejectment.
Brown for plaintiff; Thompson for
defendant.
Widening Fort street, j. w. Aus
tins appeal. Attorney-General for
the Crown; Whiting & Creighton
for appellant.
Widening Fort street, NJ. Nc
Inerny's appeal. Acknowledgement
+ for the Crown; Whiting & Creighton
! for appellant.
|. Widening Fort street, E. o. Hal
t & Sons appeal. Attorney-Genera
5 for the Crown; Whiting & Creigh
ton for appellant.
Widening Fort street, M. Nc
: Inerny's appeal. Attorney-Genera
t for the Crown; Whiting & Creigh.
ton for appellant.
Widening Fort street, j. w. Aus
, tins appeal. Acknowledgement fol-
the Crown; Whiting & Creighton
for appellant.
! Widening Fort street, H. Brad.
ley's appeal. Acknowledgement fol
/ the Crown; Brown for appellant.
Castle VS.. Mlchiels, assumpsit
Castle for plaintiff Neumann an6
Whiting & Creighton for defendant
, See Hop. & Co. VS.. Soper, trover
. Ashford & Ashford for plaintiff
p Bickerton for defendant.
n Ho Pal Yet VS.. Manuel, covenant
o Brown for plaintiff; Magoon for de
!. PENDANT.
t, Kerr vs.. Mayhem, assumpsit
e Thurston for plaintiff.
q Veasey VS.. Herbert, case. Ash
q ford & Ashford for plaintiff.
E. Cartwright VS.. Hoffnung, assump
sit. Avery for plaintiff.
u Wong Kim VS.. Soper, trover
Castle for plaintiff; Dare and Ros
r, for defendant.
e NIacfarlane VS.. Brown, riplevin
i Whiting & Creighton for plaintiff
y Brown for defendant.
r BANCo HEARINGS ON THURSDAY, ocTo
Der 7TH.
q Publ, appellant, VS., Mahulua
n equity appeal. Rosa for Publ
1t Smith for Mahulua.
y Agnew VS.. Richardson, appellant
:, exceptions. Kinney & Peterson fo
1t Agnew; Thurston for Richardson
d Kalua, appellant, VS.. Selig, excer
re tions. Neumann for Kalua; Dol
q for Selig.
,r Holt VS.. Brodie, appellant; e,
IN ceptions. Kinney & Peterson fo
is Holt; Smith for Rrodie.
Of Rowell VS.. Reciprocity Sugar Co
- appellant; exceptions. Dole fl
,e Rowell; Castle for Reciprocit
It Sugar Co.
u Frag, appellant, VS.. Adams, AZ
y, peal from Police Court, Honolulu
"a Magoon for Frag; Whiting & Creigl
r. ton for Adams.
ne Boundaries for Kapalama-kai
W Bishop, petitioner, Hawaiian Go,
w eminent, appellant. Neumann an
I'd Whiting & Creighton for Bishop
n, Attorney-General for the Crown.
~ DIVORCES,
at Nordberg (w) VS.. Nordberg Ok
"a Kinney & Peterson for Nordbel
ID (w); Attorney-General for Nor,
of berg (k).
to Kauhiololi (w) VS.. Brueger Ok
We Kinney & Peterson for Kauhiolol
Hama (w) VS.. Chun Lock Ok
Whiting & Creighton for Hama Wv
: Hilahila (w) VS.. Kanamu (k).
n All Tim (k) VS.. Meleana (w
Ashford & Ashford for All Tim Ok