The Cecil Whig., 1886-05-22

I"r. 'ihra Mary Cochran. tharlcE y. l.uHi
and Charles Bcaston .Ir
No. I:,>
EiIIE object of this sut is - procure =
4 decree ion the sale OF certain mort@a@ci
premises situated III tie tuTn OF Eintun in Sli |
county. which wcr" murt%a-gel on the iJth day %.
April. iN1J hy Mary T.. Lam to Sarah +. B,us-
ton. sine" deceased. "i whoa the plaintiff i al
Hinistr,tpr de honis non. also Iur general relief
The bill! states that on about the 18Th day ui
April. $50. the said Nary Is. Lum conveyed Sail
rcl estate "hlril Is particularly described in tile
|l4i and arCumnauyiug rvNpltS. uEtp the said
sarah L. Re5st"n il her life time by way OF mort
-'=e 10 secure The payment OF ~2.+1o which was
then due and owing from the said Mary Is. Lana
t" the s"lt Sarah 4. RnsSt"2. lablc with inter
est thereon rom April ]. lN1J IN or before the Is;
,iJg Ul 4 prll. 1873.
That afterwards the said Sarah L. Beaston diet
leaving last will aul testament. ot which <h-
appointed said Mary Is. Luu the executor who
proved the same aad oLIaired letters tcstancm-
tary thereon.
That the said sam Of = 100 being the whole Of
the estate ut -ait Sarah Z. BeIStuu for which the
SAID Mary g. Lam a. executor was chargcablc.
THE sand Mary Is. l-uln made claims tor certain
credits allowances and expenses Of lininis,rati
iug To- said Mary Is. Luin from said Sarah t.
E,Hst"u's estate in her hands aS executor. which
"rre Lowed and passed hy the Orphans Court
ul Cecil county. ANA that the balance due on said
mortgage debt i rl.l5I - shown lay y copy O..
the naa! account ! aid Mary e. Lum a. cHccu
t1r. MED Is an exhibit with the bin.
That Mary B. Lum died in April. IS1g lravin.
last will and testament. whereof She il,rroirfn fnI
Henry H. Mitct ell executor with authority to sci,
~ata Ira! cst'tc, who proved the same and obtain
r& letters testamrutIry thereon.
Ih,t The said Henry II. Mitchell. As executor cI
Mary Is. lum. in .3rr'Iuure OF authority confer
red upon him y the said last will and testament
ON or about the 1Nrh day Of September in Tho.
year lS-n. sold lI.d conveyed the said real cst,,t
t" the defendant k"j'crct. {. Taylor. who is nov
seized AMI pu sgSS"I ut the same subject to tn.
balance g.. Sll5n.+6. the mortgage debt a!orcs;i
and accrued interest thereon.
Ih.t the plaintiff hath obtained from the or
plIn>' Court Gt Cecil county letters Of admins
tratiun de h"niS non e. t. A. upon the estate Of
said Sarah l.. Bcastnn. dccca sod and that the
said sum oi sll5t.id being the balance due o:r
tered upon - OF her estate.
THAI the said N:.ry y. Lum on or about Aprtl
J. lSi". mortga@ed unto a certain William {.
ttau'l'u the said real estate for the sum of S20D1
said mortgage being due and payable with iutc!-
est on or before \ pTil !. i>7g
That MS mortgage WAS on the 18th DAY of
&i,rd, $50, assigned by the said VIM. &. Rant,
to the i.tAtrn Building cicty a b DIV cu -,,prnlr
and afterwards on tie lrth day OF Alril. lS72 as
.j-n'd by the said Building Society to the sail
SIlHt =. Bya>tpn. deceased.
/, ut She plaintiff does not know whether said
sarah l.. Rr%ston paid any valuable considers
tl"!t Tor SAID inott-J-c last meuti"ned that plain
Wa paid ry her for the same. and that it was the
pHrp"Sc and intention OF said Mary b. Ium and
~irau l.. Be;lSt"n t" release said mortgage before
the dv;tl ol tiic latter and the pIntiH is further
informed AMI believes thdt nothing is due to the
said Sarah il. BuaStuu'S estate for or on account
s..id last mentioned mortgage Of =. 600.
That as appears 10y acupy OF Sarah L. BcaSt0n's
VIII llird a. IN exhibit with said bill the defend
AIT. Clara Mary Cochran is entitled to ti, whole
ui ~hlI Sarah !. 5eH>t"n : estate. and that the
ic.eiianjS, Charles y. LVm and Charles Be:ts-
Ton .T.. have also >o1Ic interest the same a.
trustees named in sul will.
That tic defendant, Clara Mary Cochran, is an
infant under tw@ut! One years of aye and resides
with her father III the state OF Delaware: that the
,;iia 'hHS b@aStoh, e. resides in the ci y OF Bal