Los Angeles daily herald., 1886-05-08
OUR ASSESSMENT.
State Board of Equaliza-
ton Heard from.
ADVICE TO THE SUPERVISORS.
Great Difference Between the
Appraised Value and the AS
sessed Value.

-. 1s.,.
ies.eruay Ai'e'uoon '
a"u I'o'. "a cs-..s,,a- nn.. a.
Aqua''AA"' So
pesfea Deio'e ~. QUA : :, p'' '''o'
anu gave 'ns iA''ei "-"eu 'o'y SUM
sage, fatherly advice, together with a
little data on the subject Of valuation
and assassmant of nronertv in this
A.
county, ga'nereu py the nie''D'is u ''
State Board during their solourn IN
this region of the country. Mr.
u..t.t., o,an for the
"'~'ey a''e0 -.
pirates who nave INVADED our serri'o'',
and made short address to the Board
Of sunarvi.ors He said that it was
A.. -, "a ;..,;on ~ the BOARD
'no ue','e anu ~
OF Equalization TO make the assess"eh''
Of property throughout the State as
ar,,, ,o.s;hls and to see that
-. of tha bur.
each co unty pears ''s
den Of taxation. The Board hao iounu
that hanks In taking mortgages on real
..,..a .a..n.ed from f;fty TO sixty per
~. - o...ta
cent. OF the value Oh sa'u 'e ae'
and they had found that where the
banks valued piece of property offered
g. .;,v a. slo o0e the Assessor had
io' ''.v 1900 A.o,ha, ,natbod
valued u AZ tfvoo. 49, Ri he
which had been adopted py .ne Do 20 ~
SAID, TO ascertain 'he 'rus ,a'uo u p.op
erty was TO take tne court lesolus mneie
appraisements nad peeh orueleu Vi 90,
tales and compare tne aPpraiseu saiue
with the assessed vaiue. ne salu .'ia' Y".
i9gto the great boom IN real estate IN Los
Angeles county the Board had deciineu
to take into consideration 'ne sellns u
asking prices OF properly, ple,'nk ~ ~
take the appraised value as islreI W sne
people. he sad that tne poaro WI
possessed oil no desire 10 arse .ne assesseu
valuation OF properly IN tnis oouh'y,
but merely wanted 70 see Una. eaoa
county paid reasonahie proportion Vi
State taxes The Board had coiiee,ea
little data, IN iacS, nao eA s' ~ Az
appraisements OF loO estates IN Los An-
geles county and compared the aa;a WIN ~
the assessments. FOR the euinca.ion =,
the Board OF supervisors ne Ploeeeusu
to read a few OF these comparisons, q.
follows; Estate o. avery, apptsisGso go -
$500, assessed at $3.50. 1 Estate ol oaoo.
line. appraised at soooo, assessed AZ
s4570. Estate OF Mrs. >, a. hsrson,
Santa Ana, appraised at SoooV, asse.sea
at SOTO. supervisor Ross saia 'na'
this property was valued ens1rely wv
high-that 1t was worth SxoooI. E.a's
OF A. A. 0oodwin' santa ana; sPpi1seu
at s5oOO, assessed al szsIo. WI, t;sS I'
said this also was APPRAISED 700 n'5ni
d. ". BUCK OF Ionona, ~ % 49,
xioUO, assessed a. so4o' ns.as y, Sc oa'e
X. Ailen' SANTA ana, spprraas,seu ~,
you. Assessed a. co. oi' l"r. noss sa'u
that TINS appraisement was en.ns,y AZ. soV
nign- superintendent minus s",u IL.
he was one OF tue Appraisers oi .nis
property and thought ene vaiua.ioh was
about right Estate oil Patrick Mooney MY
appraised at oZ.VV0' assessed q. si1o'
Estate OF Z. =. McLsin' .asaena' ~
ppraised at Si,Uz, assessec AZ eooo.
tate OF A. briswaiter, aPPraise9 =. sf1',
goo. assessed a. szzf,sIo. Lsss sa oo "
Catherine Waidron, aPPIa.seu ny s12'oT'
assessed at sio'ooV; Es so- 40 % H.
Nordholdt. appraised AZ w. ooo. asses.
cd at s46. GAY. certain io.s o. aoe estate Oh
Z; Banning: appraised a'si''9oV' a'''s'
ed at y ZSo; ,oo
Mr.. Markley SAID ina. me Nv estate s
were appraised .. sios. 4ao anu $1,000
at s363,s5o; twenty SIX mo III
given TO banks amounted 70 s1l,ooc sna
property 70 secure said mor'sases "a'