The Stark County Democrat. [volume] (Canton, Ohio) 1833-1912, 1886-04-29
ARBITRATION.

l NffN fffNNf N''N" ~
ARBITRATION.
We might ag we'll speak Of curing q can
Ger with rose water We CA neyer aet'
tlo the N 'nlty until we make our Citl-
2'Da free 10 The opportunities Of life
We ore 10 day selling tho rights OF
future generations, We are selling
large tracts OF land to Engllahmen,
They do not wan the land 10 Itself
They cannot take II over 10 England
with them. What II on Engllshman
should come here and contract Tor o
million bables, born or TO be born, ard
keep them until they were able to serve
him on 9layesY There is cheaper way
than that, Ho buys tract Of land ana
holds II uutil by lrCrea6e OF population
people are crowded out on II aud then
demands tribute Of them FOR their priyll.
ego Of gaining o living by toillng on
tl's land They ore aa much, nay more,
hi5 slaves ~ n no held them aa cbgltela,
"Nnw how ~ thla tlg't OF prOp.r'y 10
be- se'ufpdY ltoW not be done In The
present state OF elyl' 2 li0n hy nr equal
distribution " land, We would have Co
make q fpdIs,r.Uu iln NJ stated Inter
yula, We must give men Bb5oluto
clrity upon condition that they 0'e 20
p'y 10 the clmmuniiy "A giy'u rental
AbOIigh a'l other inXiti0u ami throw
me weiGh II UXlliun ON land values
until, Wrp boy step, We raise lHnd tax :.
ton 90 fhH fall nnnuH' yI'uo OF tne
Mul This would relieve both labor
uud CNDtI from thr burdens that now
01preas lhem. This would DO away with
the O gain tho m & ls who neither
uYa tlp land Themselves nor allow
utberl t1 usp H. Working pc pie ora
crowded together In great Hwarma in
unhpHlJhIul New York ,egemenie, aud
yot no. h|t chs. Island lH built over Ii
3 I8l NE pmN In your city l'hw %
gIpIf uuOceuplp' ifnCt NJ lNNd to-day
iu Ih' halft Uf your city, ! was tul
that That lHl0ng4 20 % peUtlernn who
now liWgin NA hlnF'Ou, Senator Payne
Why should y u mon allow tho vacant
NNl47 On the center VI Your cilyY Do Hs
/ nv, concentrate your taxes on t'o
WIuo OF no laul, ana then you would
bayg no dog In The m ugers, who Di2l
upon more lRud than they can use. !
see Governor Foraker hOe been eonding
a mes ngo TO The Legislature that X
lluded a8 very gtntcamnnllkp, | wish N
were, A tax on personal proqCry Is
merely
Ajax ON CONSCIENCE,
llo proposes % '0x sleeping cars, The
owners will simply pay this tax, and
charge " 10 you. What stupid thing
Is this attempt 10 t0x capital wieh
there was more capital. Why do you let
the TAX assessor swOop down on the pro.
d1cer and fine him for his th,if 7
When you have too many doga you put u
tax on them t1 le81en their numb b'r
You put tax ON capital, aud the owner
will either charge you for II or walk out
Of the state with "; but when you tnX
land values he would not walk out OF
the stnte with the land Land hna NO
value until two men want H., The great
yaluo Of that land Of Senator pOyno'a IL
duo 10 nothing that he ever did for ~
but to the population about II. Halt Of
Manhattan iBlnnd was once sold FOR a jug
of whisky. That would no n
high price for II 90 day, n oil
The people AhOuld move away
How this tnxation Of land values would
do nway with political COTTuptiuul
william Saunders, N. p, proposes
no taxation and u pension 10 everybody
citizenship In clylll2Al community
ought 10 lnaure every man from The
fear that II no should die hla wife AID
Bhildren would starye, have been
charged with having 0 curious c0nceit
ln suggesting that New York ehould
own ite street railways and run them
free. That Is not n c0ncelt Of mine, but
tpe suggestion Of practical capltaliat
| " your city trnJn l.. J0hna0r) Whoa a
man owns q large Oi0gk hu dooan'i
charge people for the privilege OF riding
on the elevator that runs In that block,
and no more should people pay for tho
privilege OF riding about the city Free
street railways would advance tho value
OF real estate In q city"
BY what rule would you determine
the rate OF rentp
at would not be necessary for q good
while, / would tax the selling value OF
land. Az the tax mounted tho aelllng
value would diminish until II wonld
have merely On annual value"
How would you increase land taxes as
TO reduce its value to nothing without
In Justice 10 those who own this land,
having purchased II from their earn
ingep t
'The wrong would DO apparent. The
men who would lose relatively could
well afford 10 lose ". They would gain
In other capacities"
How would you erforcs the collection
Of delinquent taxesp Z
Just aa II IL enforced now"
Ia9ut ahnui naiinuhl tDxbR2