The true northerner. [volume] (Paw Paw, Mich.) 1855-1920, 1886-05-06

Contract of Sale-Parol contract for
sale of goods not in store y within the
statute of frauds. -Pawelski VS.. Har-
greaves; New Jersey Court of Errors
and Appeals.
Trade Mark-Cse of ones own name
is not an infringement of the trade
mark of anothe of the same name
Rogers VS.. Rogers; Connecticut SUI
preme Court OF Errors.
Partnership-A firm is liable for
money Improperly brought into the
concern, although subsequently re-
turned TO the trustee who converted it
to his own use.-Ryan VS.. Morrill, !;
Kentucky Court of Appeals.
Railway Passenger-Eiected for re-
fusing to pay fare, q passenger cannot
regain his right to passage by offering
to pay during or after the election
Pease VS.. Del, LAX. q Western II. II.
Co.; New York Court of Appeals.
Passage of Title-A manufacturer
filling an order by delivery to com
mon carrier, nothing in the transaction
indicating different intention, thereby
completes the sale, and the title passes
at the place of shipment. -Sarbecker
vs.. State; Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Insurance Policy on Merchandise
a merchant insuring his stock for a
value greater than that set upon it in
taking out the license prescribed by
law can not recover upon his insurance
policy in case of loss. Pollard VS.. Ph9-
nix Insurance Company; Mississippi
Supreme Court.
Bill of Lading-When the bill is 81
lent rs to the mode of storing goods in
transit the carrier is protected if the
goods are stored in the usual place,
notwithstanding the package bears d.
rections to the contrary. National
Bureau of Engraving and Manufactur-
ing Co. VS.. the New rleans" United
States Circuit Court, Eastern District,
Louisiana.
Agreement and That
which the law will say contracting
party ought in reason to be satisfied
with, that the law will say he is salts
fled with. Therefore contract pro-
viding for work to be paid for when
the persons were satisfied that the
boilers as changed are success" was
fully performed when the work was
done, accepted, and used without OBJ
lection or complaint. Safety
Boiler Company VS.. Garden; New York
Court of Appeals.
Communication Ticket-A person ac-
customed to travel regularly on COM
mutation ticket left it at home one day
by inadvertence, and on being asked
on the train refused to pay fare. Upon
learning of this the officials of the road
ISIS ed orders forbidding the future sale
of communication tickets to him. He OBJ
tanned O writ of mandamus to compel
the sale of Communication tickets to him,
such tickets being sold to all others APP
plying for them. ex rel. Atwater
VS.. Delaware, Lackawanna and West
ern r. II. Co.; New Jersey Supreme
Court.
Accident insurance. policy hold
er, insured against injuries effected by
external, accidental, or violent causes
not due to bodily infirmity or disease
of the insured, and suicide expressly
excepted, became insane and commit
ted suicide Held that the act was not
voluntary and rational; therefore, the
violence which caused death was the
same as if due to an outside agency,
and the widow is entitled to recover -
Crandall VS.. Accident Insurance Com
pany of North America; United States
District Court, Eastern District of
Wisconsin.