Iowa County democrat. [volume] (Mineral Point, Wis.) 1877-1938, 1886-06-11
HOME RULE DEFEATED.
The Government Is Defeated by Vote
Of 3+1 Against 311 on the
Home Rule Bill.
Summary Of the Speeches Made by
Goschen. Gladstone. Palncll and
Others in the House.
THE HOME RULE BILL.
Tie Government Defeated.

ItE HDhE HI LII BILL.
Tie Government Defeated.
/ LONDON. June S.-The government was
! defeated tonight by a majority of 30 on
/ the second reading of the home rule bill.
/ The vote on the bill was 81 for the meas
ure and 81 against it. Gladstone moved
/ an adjournment until Thursday and the
/ motion was adopted.
/ Right Hon. Geo. J. GOschen .liberall re-
sumed debate on the home rule bill. and
said the bill was to be message of peace
to Ireland. which the premier said would
be torn to fragments forthwith, after its
/ second reading. The sovereignty of the
/ imperial government depended on the
clause which was highly probable the ma
! jOrity Of the house would never consent
! to- If the bill passed Il tremendous strug-
| gle would be inaugurated by the Catholic
/ clergy of Ireland for the control of the
/ education in that country. Regarding
| the question whether the bill would prove
the final settlement of the Irish difficulty.
or at least to evental separation, GOschen
said he did not think it would prove a
finally. That would depend entirely on
the assurance given by the Irish members.
The premier at one time was supposed to
have given a pledge to reconstruct the
/ bill, but he subsequently Indignantly re-
pudiated that assumption.
Glanstone tinterrupting That Is a
gross error. What the gentleman thinks
looked like Indignation was my eager re-
pudtatiOn of the cool statement that |
had resolved TO reconstruct the bill"
Goschen resuming said he saw the dis
tinction but was unable to see how the
premier could avoid difficulty. The house
Is now informed that
THE BILL Is NOT To BE RECONSTRUCTED.
Cries of oh, Oh. and cheers amid
which Gladstone expressed signs of dis
sent We're the government going to stand
by their bill or not: Loud opposition
and cheers. This state Of doubt came
from voting not on the bill but from the
explanation given the foreign office and
amplitied and explained away on the
Friday following. Further explanation
to answer were made on the ensuing
Monday. 1t has also been elected from
various letter which passed
between the premier and
his followers that the reconstruction
bill was basis on which many members
would unite in voting with the government
on the measure. Everyone admitted il to
be the most important ever submitted to
parIiment. The opponents of the
bill will have achived their re
suit if the bill ia withdrawn
after second reading if it passes that
stage The premier Is now more anxious
to learn from his supporters what they will
authorize him to give than insist upon
knowing what the ParnelliteS will accept
Cheers. The house will remember the
first reading of this bill and it will recall
Z .ifrI,+ IL,
Ireland's repeated illusions to certain
subterranean forces. We do not hear 50
much thereof now.
Concluding Goschen said. The presence
of the Irish members ut Westminster is
Incompatible with a separate Irish paria-
ment. 1t will be impossible to include
Ulster in Dublin parliament Parncll-
ite cries NO, No" The clauses relating
to taxation and finance also continued
GoS"hrn, are
INHEEENE DEFECTS IN THE BILL.
He asked if the home rule bill was in
scpeparably tied up with the land pur-
chase scheme. "Oh, Oh" and cheers
He had seen some correspondence in
which the premier stated the subjects in
separable in the minds of the government.
At this moment the word inseparable did
not convey anything clear and definite.
The speaker was entitled to know whether
if the home rule bill returned in au-
tumn it would be accompanied by
the land purchase bill, where to it
had been said to be inseparably tied. He
would also like to know whether any rays
of light regarding Ulster penetrated the
open mind of the government. We're the
members of the house to remain ignOr-
ant as to whether the government intend
ed to ignore listers earnest pleadings?
In conclusion. Mr.. Goshen said: " | i'm
plore the house, by the tradition of which
We are heirs, by the obligations of duty
and honor by our hopes for the future of
the empire, by our duty to the queen, to
look to it that those who shall come after
Us may bear witness that we have not be
trayed our trust. Loud cheer.
FARNELL TIE NEXT STEAMER.
was loudly cheered by his followers. He
said: Il should ordinarily have lacked
confidence in following so able and elo-
quent speaker in this contest of giants.
but think thrice Is he armed VINO hath
his quarrel Just" CHEERS and unequal
and inferior as | am at many points. l
hope I shall not be so far behind as usual.
Hear. Hear9. Without intending any
disrespect, l could not help thinking
while listening to his speech, in all lost
causes wherewith l have seen him conneC-
ted during many years past. he was never
80 little effective as when contending
against the bill we hope to read q second
time to night Cheers Goschen sought
l think very unfairly, to cast a lurid light
on the situation by his allussion to those
unhappy outrages III Kerry. l join in
the expression of contempt for that COW
ardly disgraceful practice, I join him
to the fullest extent hear hear."l but
neither do l say that because the evictions
have been more numerous in Kerry than
in all the rest of Munster put together.
But when l denounce these Outrage~
1 DENOCNCE THEM