New-York tribune., 1886-03-12
JOsEPH F. LOUBATS APPEAL.
,pc1-MENrs BEFORE THE GENERAL TERM.

ARGUMENTS BEFORE THE GENERAL TERM.
,oevpu II. cHoATE oN ONE sIDE-MEssRs. ROBIN
soy AND CARTER on THE orHFR
,,+ho Sunreme Court, General Term, before
yudg.s Davis Brady and Diuiels' tue case oi d. a.
Iophat AGAINST the Union Club vas argued on Appeals
,or,,v 7 H. Cboste. Thomas 7. Sherman and
49, =, p,nnev. tr. appeared for Mr.. Loubst. and
- q Carer and L. l. Robinson FOR
,h cluh The appeal from the judg-
,, rendered by Judge Van Worst at speciai
TT, last year, dismissug the plaiut,Ts complaint
.sa,nst the club he claimed that he had been
uniusty exp-led aud asked reinstatement Mr' Choao
gave vvacous account OF his clients troubles win 'he
ub before pouting dcts the injustice whlon nc
rr.seuted Mr. Ioubat had suffered. After describing
Mr. Loubars quarrel with Mr. Turnbul he tod now inc
Governing COnmittee appointed SUB cOnlm'ee oi hNe
TO investigate the dIf Guilty aud how they expeeo MI
Loubat In their report lie made ei<h points III "'"o
lug the regularity OF the proceedlngs ou'
only the first four These were:
That the Of fourteen. by which Mt Louoa ~ w en-
was accomplished not two thirds 81 me ao ~ Ans
Is car conrite re Oa cd a. - ote fo A.
n bep5er OF the committee had not rece Veu no1o ~ q,
tst MT Louoa mad not Gsl ana ia o r Opportunity
puson had been pronounced on uiu anu anu d an oootuuity
l. be hH,rd; tina, MI Louoa. SHOULD aSo "du u"
% cOnfront and cross examine Witnesses ,,o
an, remaining poi.ts were that Mr.. Lonb"t hsl 10 o
renrdy wulu the ub Itself and Was emitted 10 a,pea
tno courts. And that individual mel VI SnoaIe sad:
Zee were pr iudced AGAINST MI LoubIt MI SnUs'e @ NJ
Judge Van Worst around Tue 'nade no
i'%aoas % nAt r Mr LiuOat nad male the lisa
pI"O1'1' r,,.rr t,,nuisd To him ana tLe expuislJu
tIcea"o, , ~ ht submit that court mad nothing
10 30 ,yIfb me merits tue case. IL cruz cNpes
~ n for a ling women from tue club Windows your
c,nn' rev ew that decision If the uau nds been
,G pcsu4ry But did Mr. L,uDat nave fiir pay I
Ifois rxu,IIr,l without warning. He never knew GA
~ s,,Isn,. ne mad been expelled. The question OF
expulsion hal been mO"ted uhtl aIteL tne eo'
ius began winch ended by expeug MN we Ser9 Ie
h rrrI from trying he case Its merits aud judge
Van Worst avowedy decitcs II on us merIs, ~ .s
ridiculous 10 suppose thlt We 0OA'N NV ~
doyu IuruDulrs testimony ,-,-,, ,
Both Mr. Garter aud Nj. Robinson spoke III oenai VI
The cub. Nh Robinson argued thtt MI Louuat ,.t
criyed Anpe notice TO dpp'ar before tle
committee and that he came ~ re WIN cousv, "a rir,
prepared statement auu Vh"l me os @ VI ,'y w.
WAS "a sufficient vote OF expulsion IL "as ou5
tLrts OF tue quoruiH whch Vas o%oaI' % =, w.. IN facI
10 DO all Ihc remaining Work OF tue o'uu ~ 80 80
thirds of the commtee as II then existed lhee oo
ing vscaucieS Mr. brlsto"s lrrin "S "5I, Ms
her had not begun. On tne quoSSiou qT ,,sl, rT
Mr. Robinson SAID that MI Townsend oI
lie committee was only cousin OF Mr.. IurnOu!s Wllr
gnI Townsend than between Townsend ana LOuniL
Vor.t that Mr. LOu6u had exhausted his RENE "
inside the clun itself The constitution empoweel Tue
tho95h II ana nT, 7"S I' Inn B he did not JUICE
DAVIS suggested that Xpeled membcr cJud se%Feey
be expected To prefer such request
on pout 10 b. noticed the was tnat wa"ver
complaint MIR. Louhat may have hAd against tue tluo
al no, occur 10 pin uuu the expulsion WAS ali over
All the dcirct- proceedings Oh the part Oi the euo
Mr. Choate sal to the Court At the conclusion OF Mr.
Carers 50 ech that all NJ. Loubdts Complaints were
made aitr the expulsion was over because uu every
thlng was over had icOu that anything was
going on. The decision reserved.
SEEKING TO REMOVE Mr. STEVENS As TRUSTEE
In the suit of Mrs. Mary G. richardson
against her brother c. Anory stevens. in which she
seeks to have aim removed rom the position Of trustee
unter their faith H. motion on her behalf Tor an
luu. cuuu aud receiver made rrdty supreme
Court Chambers, before Justice LIwreuce. By the
VIII OF WILMA stevens, who died nine years ago. his
proprrtv worth SB7U0JJ u De- dlSpd,ei O oy pay
IN ebts amounting 100000 and dividing the residue
iuo three pa Is Of TG Uequ he'd absolutely
To MS son ana the other -lven him Ia trust Tor MS
Two sisters The pd Iti CHARGES th ne das negeceI
10 pay debts of the estate has lseI lhe rust moneys
iu ID -cu a ou aud invested them Ia his own name
An af uVI by Mr.. stevens was prcSente denying thr
Charge. and dccag that lie has managed the estate -
tna IL aas largey increased IN value Fac decision was
reserved
JUDGE HYATT REAFFGRMI AN ORDER
The only dec.s rendered by judge Hyatt
OF the CITY COurl demurrer the compliant IN
the case Of Newell against May been reatrncd by
him after further hearing On motion OF Livingston
Olcutt the paul Orueys. he has directed IN Al the
orl-r trs 10 dr by hIu De Opeuei wing h' h1tlf an
opportunity amend his complaint on utyurut OF $50
or he falls to do 50. ordering JudGAeht Iog the