National Republican., 1886-12-14
THE COURT RECORD.

ton VS.. Furst Il Bradley Manufacturing Com
pany. Opinion by Justice Blatcbford con-
forming to previous decision of the court
Fanny d. wylie :vs. Northampton National
Bank. Opinion by Justice Matthews sustain
ing the decision OF the. court below. ,-,
United States VS.. John Paul Jones. opinion
by Chief Justice Chase denying the motion to
dismiss
Jacob johnson ct al. VS.. Chicago and Pacific
Elevator Company. Opinion by Justice Blatoh-
ford affirming Judgment below.
No. 81 BENJAMIN +. Buzard ct al. VS.. Robert
A. Houston. Decree reversed and cause re.
manded with directions to enter decree dis
missing the bill for want OF Jurisdiction. with
the costs in that court and without prejudice
to the right of the plalntilt TO sue at law 0pin-
ion BY Mr. Justice Cray dissent ng. Mr.. Justice
No, ~ Frederick Kramer, assignee, &C., vs..
Isaao Conn ct al. Decree affirmed with costs
opinion by Mr.. Justice Gray.
No. 81. The Wiillamsport National Bank vs.
Daniel u. Knapp and Wm. d. Thompson. sc.
dismissed for the want of Jurisdiction. 0piu-
ion by Mr.. Justice Gray,
No. 81. Shirley G. Ashby vs.. Sedney NJ: Hall
and Henry NJ. .Parchen, Judgment affirmed
with costs opinion by Mr.. Justice Fields.
No. Sl5. Loyina Campbell Ct al. VS.. the La,
with costs. Opinion by Mr. JnsticS Miller.
No. g. The Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati
and Indianapolis Railroad Company vs. ID. W.
Cling, Judgment affirmed with costs. Opin-
ion BY A'r. Chief Justice WAlio.
No. 49, The baltimore aud Ohio Railroad
Company W. George iates. judgment reversed
proeeedibss m ding " 10 be- had therein, in Conformity
with the opinion OF this court. Opinion by
Mr.. Chief Justice Waite,
No. 90. Charles q. Pepper ct al. vs. Samuel
W. Fordyce, assignee, sc. Decree reversed,
and cause remauded with directions TO dismiss
the bill filed originally In that court by For
dyce against Pepper and Lattn without pref.
udlce, and to remand the cause removed from
the state court, each party TO pay It's own costs
In the circuit court and the costs in this court
TO be paid one'half by each, Of the parties.
Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Waite.
No. 81. Edward.D. Donnelly ct al, executor,
SC, VS.. the District of Columbla appeal from
the court of claims. Judgment affirmed. Opin.
ion by Mr.. Chief Justice Waite.
No. 90. John Halsted vs. Sarah A. Buster ct
al. Judgment reversed with costs, and cause
remanded for further proceedings. Opinion
by Mr ChiSi Justice % %WSite; -, p,,or, p,u.
by Mr. Chief Justice Waite.
No 7s7. Charles II. Brooks VS.. Edward s.
Clark. judgment affirmed with costs. Opin.
ion by Mr. Chief Justice Waite.
No. 0iS. The Germania Insurance Company
Of New Orleans VS.. The State of Wisconsin.
Judgment affirmed with costs Opinion by
No. g5i. The Peoples Insurance Company of
New Orleans VS.. The State of Wisconsin.
Judement affirmed with costs. Opinion by
No. li4s T. p. Winchester trustee. ct al, VS..
]. b., Helskell ct al. Decree affirmed with
costs. Opinion by, Mr.. Chiei Justice Waite
=, No, 1919. John l.. Street rs; + p Ferry.
Dismissed for the " want of Jurisdiction. opinion
by Mr.. Chief Justice W0ite; ,.
No. ll43. John Nethercliff ct al. vs. William
IL, Robertson, collector, &c; aud No. lbs.
John Irwin vs. The San Francisco Savings
Union ct al. Motions to advance denied. An
nounced by Mr.. Chief Justice Waite.
No. 100. The United States plaintiff, VS..
Ramon Arizona. Motion to advance granted
ard case assigned for argument OH the first
Monday, Of January next af.er cases already
No. i9l. Henry G. Hulskamp ct al, plaintiffs
in error, vs.. The. Moline Wagon Company.
Motion to dismiss denied. Announced by Mr..
Chief Justice Waite.
No 81. Emii Heinemnn ct al VS.. Chester A.
Arthur, late collector, DC. Motion!,o call aud
dismiss pursuant 10 sixteenth rule denied. An
nounccd by Mr.. Chief Justice Waite.
The other business transacted by the court
No. llS. Alva worden ct al, appellants, vs..
Anson Searls. Motion to dismiss submitted by
| Mr.. J. 2. Fitch in support of motion, and by
Mr.. Charles J. Hunt in opposition thereto.
| No. l26 The sun Mutual Insurance Company
| Of New Orleans Ct a., appellants, VS.. The
| finn submitted by Mr.. Il. II, Browne and Mr..
| &. b. Singleton In support OF motion, and by
Mr.: G. j. sansumin In opposition thereto.
Mrs. Eliza Jane Hobrook. Submitted ,pnr'
suant to 32d rule by Mr.. ]. p, Rouse and Mr.,
Wm. Grant for appellant, aud Mr. T. j. semmes
| and Mr. Robert Mott for appellee.
| No. 90 The Northern Pacific Railroad Com
rany, plaintiff, in error, VS.. Mark Paine. Ar
| pued by Mr.. W. p. Clough for plaintiff in er-
ror and BY Mr. f. NJ. Wilson for defendant in
| error.
| No. 0l. Felix Borer administrator. &C.,
ct al, appellants, vs.. George NJ. Chapman,
| executor, &c. Argument commenced by Mr..
| W. p Clough for appellants
| Court in General Tcrnl-ChiefJustice Cart
| ter ard Justice CoX-United Statesvs. Hitz aud
| Preutlss; opinion by Justice Cox reversing
| Judgment below aud remanding case. Ander-
| son VS.. Tenney; opinion by Justice Cox revers
| ing judgment below. Larman VS.. District o
Columbia: opinion by Chief Justice Cartier af
| fIming Judgment below. Shipman vs. Nc
Garlty; opinion by Justice Cox remand ling case
for new trial Assignment unchanged.
Circuit Court-Justice Hagner = Vanhorn
Grin.n & Company ys. spellhousei judgment
tomac Railroad Company; jury out Hunting
vs, Buckingham; judgment by default As
signments unchanged.
Equity Conrt-Just,ce James.-Youug VS.
Marks; auditors report confirmed aud distri
button ordered. Lemon VS.. Fitlgerald: OF
hearing. Gleason VS.. FrUhlich: order appoint
ing Sarah A. Frohlch guardian ad litem
Brent VS.. Middleton; dismissal OF bill as to lot
27 and 2S, square 2sl, ordered
Criminal Court-Justice MacArthur.-Jame
Hill, second ofienso petty larceny: nolle pros
entered. b, F. Bgelow, embezzlement thlr
teen cases.; nolle pros. entered. Sarah Jack
son and Mary Ellen Jackson grand larceny; OF
trial Assignment for to.day-Philip Stanton
robbery and assault with intent 70 klll; Fran
Howe, bigamy: william Lee, larceny; Fraul
breaking.
|