The Daily bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Hawaii]) 1882-1895, 1886-07-27
MONDAY, July 9th.

the July Term OF the supreme Cour5
to date:-
MONDAY, July 9Th.
The Court opened at loan. Pre-
sent: Judd, c. j., presiding Henry
Smith, Deputy Clerk; j. II. Soper,
Marshal. His Excellency Paul Neu-
mann, Attorney General, introduces
his successor, John L. Dare, to the
Court, who presents to the Court his
commission, which is read by the
Marshal. At 1915 AM, the Court
adjourns for the day in honor of the
Fourth of July.
TUESDAY, July 9th.
The King VS.. Puhili, polygamy.
Defendant pleads guilty and is SEN
fenced to six months hard labor and
500 fine. A. Rosa for prosecution.
The King VS.. Keanini, larceny 4th
degree. Trial before Hawaiian jury,
who render verdict of guilty. A.
Rosa for prosecution w. A. Kinney
for defendant. William Foster,
clerk.
WEDNESDAY, July 9TH.
Keanini is sentenced to 10 days at
hard labor and to pay $2l.75 costs.
Hama VS.. Chun Lock. Ordered
that summons be published and case
continued till the October term.
Whiting and Creighton, attorneys
for plaintiff.
THURSDAY, July 9Th.
Mary S. Rose vs.. Henry Smith,
ejectment. After argument on de.
murrer, ordered that demurrer be
overruled. w. A. Kinney for plain
tiff; V. V. Ashford for defendant.
w. r. Castle VS.. j. N. Kaiaika-
waha, assumpsit. Plaintiff S motion
for default is argued and submitted.
H. E. Avery for plaintiff M. Thomp-
son for defendant.
All Hong VS.. w. e. Parke. De-
PENDANTS plea in bar is argued and
submitted. A. C. Smith for plain
tiff; Whiting and Creighton for de-
PENDANT.
FRIDAY, July 9th.
Before Judd, C. j.; McCully and
Preston, u.
G. H. Luce VS.. Chin Wa, appel
liant. Appeal from Intermediary
Court. Appeal argued and SUBJ
mitted. A. Rosa for plaintiff II.
E. Avery for defendant.
Emma Beckley ct al, appellants,
VS.. +. Metcalf, ct al. Equity appeal.
Submitted on briefs. Paul Neu-
mann for plaintiffs; j. Austin and
j. A. Magoon for defendants.
The King VS.. VIM. Ebeling. De-
PENDANTS appeal from Police Justice
of Lahaina is dismissed for want Of
jurisdiction. v. V. Ashford for
defendant. A second case between
the same parties is similarly dis
posed OF.
In Castle VS.. Kaiaikawaha, it is
ordered that defendant may file his
plea, ON paying costs of motion fol-
default. Final costs to await judg.
ment.
VIM. Ebeling VS.. Catherine
Ebelng, divorce. Divorce granted
V. V. Ashford for plaintiff.
SATURDAY, July 10th.
Before the full Court.
j. M. Horner VS.. Claus Spreckels
Appeal argued and submitted. s
b. Dole and j. Austin for plaintiff
Paul Neumann for defendant.
MONDAY, July 18th.
Before the full Court.
Ahlo VS.. Mung Hui, appellant
Exception. Argued and submitted
II. +. Avery for plaintiff; Pau
Neumann, A. Rosa and j. A. Magool
for defendant.
j. H. Wood vs.. b. F. Dillingham;
equity appeal. Argued and sub
mitted. w. A. Kinney and w. A
Whiting for plaintiff S. b. Dole TO
defendant.
The King VS.. VIM. Ebeling, sup
preston of affenses. Defendant
motion to reinstate case on calenda
is denied. V. V. Ashford for de
PENDANT.
The King VS.. VIM. Ebeling, as
sault. Defendants motion to reir
J state case on calendar is denied. Y
V. Ashford for defendant.
!, The King VS.. +. Kekoa and j. "
, Kumahoa, exceptions. Argued an
a,.hun;tta1 w Kinnau for II