San Antonio daily light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1886-1907, 1886-06-15
JUSTICE ADAMS COURT
Judgments Rendered, in This Court, Mon
day. June 18th

Judgments Rendered, in This Court, Mon.
day, June l4th.
! T. &. Pray VS.. William Davis, dismissed un
! der the rule for costs.
! O'Connor a sullivsn VS.. L. Koenger ct al
! suit on note for Slbb Judgment for plaintiff
| against KoengeT and dismissed as TO Martin.
| J. L. PANEL vs.. G. H and s. A X. r., suit
for damages dismissed under rule for cost.
| Hugo 4 NadleT, assignees Of A. koen VS.. Joe
| Sheely. Judgment by agreement in favor Of
plaintiffs for Sl25 70.
william Boyd, White Co. VS.. VIM Peter
son, on sworn account for sl5O0s, judgment
for plaintiffs.
Ponton and Fly, VS. Buck Franklin. suit on
sworn account for $4s,5ol0o. Judgment by
default for plaintiffs
Valentine schmidt VS.. julius Freimuth
suit on note for $50. Jungment for plaintiffs
for confession.
| Wheeler Wilson manufacturing company
vs.. Joseph Zimmerly, suit for balance due,
Judgment by default for plaintiff
Same VS.. Virginia and X. c. Symington.
Dismissed by plaintiff at the cost of defend
D. Il A. Oppenheimer vs. John NcKinsey,
suit ON note for s75 J-lD. Judgment for
Hugo & Schneider VS.. John b. Shields, bal.
ance ON note of $45 l-lO0. Judgment for
| plaintiffs.
sworn account for SS4. Dismissed for want
| of prosecution.
Hugo 4 Schneider vs. 5. A Cobb ct al. suit
| on note for sl74, sd.lOO. Judgment for plain
| tiff.
Same VS.. Mrs. p. Cody, suit for balance m
SIS. Judgment for plaintiff
J. p. Earl, cashier, VS. Narciso Leal, suit on
note for 500. Judgment for plaintiff.
II. N. Wolfram VS.. A. W. COrnehls, suit on
note for sl42. Judgment for plaintiff.
5. Deutsch 4 Co. VS.. J A. Carr, suit on note
for 4B45. Judgment for plaintiffs.
Abraham Frank vs. Thomas N. Devine, suit
on note for $50 Judgment for plaintiff.
Same vs.. Thomas NJ Devine, suit on note for
SEQ. Judgment for plaintiff.
a.
ment for plaintiff.
Antoine Halamuda VS.. Manuel Sanchez, suit
on sworn account for $3.50. Judgment by de-
fault for plaintiff.
X. II. Brown vs.. II. B. Salliway ct al, suit on
note for SIS; Judgment for plaintiff.
.ssy L al, sae vs. mrs. mltnor ct a. Sworn
lssy Landa VS.. Mrs. FurgersOn, sworn ac
count for S7.75 Judgment for plaintiff.
lssy Landa VS.. L. Wenz sworn account for
81. n Judgment for plaintiff.
lssy Landa VS.. +. kimbOd, sworn account
for - 4. Judgment for plaintiff
Calhoun 4 Meek VS.. Murray Dresch, suit on
note for Sl3 20 Judgment for plaintiff.
ID. Il A. Oppenheimer VS.. d. f. Mcdaniel,
suit ON note for S3I 90. Judgment for plaintiff.
ID A. OppenhelmeT We J. E Lockwood,
SUIT on account for $50 q. Judgment for
Newman 4 Co VS. Max Samuels. suit on
sworn account for SIPS IS. Judgment for
plaintiff.
Schmidt & Zeiler VS.. Locks l. Smith, for
SlG4l. Judgment for plaintiff.
ID. A. Oppenheimer VS.. Ben Cravey. Judg-
ment on note for $40 and interest
Newman h Co. VS.. j. Walker and wife, on
sworn account for sl5.05-l0O. Judgment for
plaintiffs.
Rice Ryan VS.. A. II. Steagsll, suit on
Hyyams Walker VS.. l.. Eisner, on sworn
account for $G. Judgment for plaintiff.
sworn account for SIS. Judgment for plain
tifs with writ for inquiry.
Paul Wagner VS.. Kelly and Shean, on sworn
account for SiO6 1910. Judgment for PLAIN
tin.
Paul Wagner VS.. J.B. Belorhadsky, on sworn
account for So. 5000. Judgment by confes-
sion for plaintiff.
ID. A. Oppenheimer VS.. Thomas N. Devine,
suit on note for S53. Judgment for plaintiffs.
Having finished the call of the docket and
having no other business on hand to-day, JUS
tice Adam closed his office and went out to
join picnic party near the first mission, this
being the only day he has taken for recrea-
ton In 81 * years. The LIGsT hopes he enjoy ed
the picnic