New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1886-12-16

THE ARCHBISHOP SUSTAINED by MOST OF THEM
EXCEPT "TnE BROOKLYN EXAMINER"

THE ARCHBISHOP SUSTAINED BY MOST OF THEM
EXCEPT "THR BROOKLYN ExAMINER"
The Roman Catholic press Of this city and Brooklyn
has a. rule refrained from discussing the case OF d.
MoGlynn Most Of the papers only refer TO Inc matter
In the news without giving any opinion on tne
matter. A RBUNE reporter called on the editors OF
the most prominent papers yesterday to obtain an
preseon Of their views the question and found tnat
nearly all of them sided with the Archbishop and be-
eved that no had acted perfectly light In tho matter
p. v. Hickey, Editor OF The Catholic Review said;
We have reirained from discu-sing The matter. oe-
cause we do not think that isa pIoTer subject for
either tho religion: or secular press 70 handle Ms
Glynn For outside people to pass any opinion on tae
snbect show contempt Of the court before whom
the matter 10 to be tried.
IN. Freeman's Journal TOOK DR.. McGiynn to task
thrse or four years ago for supporting Mr.. Davitfs
scheme Of land naturalization. Maurice I. Esan the
assistant editor, said:
he Journal is in entire sympathy with Archbishop
at present He is quite able take of himself
We take stock In MI. Georges land theories. FOR
for which sne ss been struggling for years. the e
ppral possession of Rome.
7. p. Meehsn. Editor OF The Irish American salai
Why. TIE TRIBUNE gave the meat OF tue whole DUST
wien 1t published that dispatch from .ne nru
bishop don't SEQ how any genuine Catholic snect can
co1ssten discuss the matter, as II now stanuh Juox
ing from my exchanges should say tnat nearly all OF
them throughout the country have taken tuis view
The Taolet had this to say IN its last tssue
The Now daily papers working hard TO get up
sensational between Archbishop Corrigan aud the
Rev. Dr. McGlynn. The latter. 1t Is caiinea mas oeen
summoned to Rome there To explain to tue Holy fatner
certain political hereies which he Is said to have pro-
mulgatod in opposition the doctrines OF the Church
THIS all very silly II Dr. McGlynD has done wrong
the Archbishop viii discipline him. and tue reverend
gen, erpan will quietly submit to the ArchbshoPs
orders. That's all there Is about II.
All OF these papers, Of indorse the Arohbishops
pastoral letter condemn Georses reply to it. The
Brooklyn kzami,er however, taxes different position
II sides with Mr.. George and says in leading article
about the ArchbIshop's pastoral letter,
1t in no manner lnerieres with them lMr GEORGES
theors) although 1t warns people aglnst whal goou
many suppose to se MIR. Georges theories
Then after attempting to show how the views OF the
Archbishop and Mr. George really In harmony the
article says:
We say things not to crticise or cavl at what
the Archbishop NewYor believe not to enforcS
any views Ourselves hold. hut simply TO place an
clearly before readers so tnat no
one may condemn 1t without understanding It's fuu
scope.
This article has stirred up the fr.epds OF the Arch
bishop is said thai the prelate himself dspeased
with It.
Father McGlynn renamed at homo nearly all day and
declined the usual number OF requests tor an interview
profess ignorance when he will start for
Rome but most OF them TO think that he will go
away suddenly when he gets ready.
Archsnop Corrig IN started yesterday TOT baitimore,
where there is to be meeting prrntes Tor the next
few days cOufer with Cardinal Gibbons on various
subleos including 1t is said, the land and LABOR ques-
TONS