The Iola register. [volume] (Iola, Allen County, Kansas) 1875-1902, 1886-06-18

Effort In lts Bsh.lE-Bestsn
By Thirty Majority.
LONDON, June S.-The Government was
defeated by = majority Of thirty on the
second reading of the Home Rule bill last
evening. The vote on the measure was 3ll
for and 81 against
Mr.. Gladstone then moved an adjourn
mept until Thursday and the motion WAS
adopted.
Mr.. Gladstone entered the House Of Com
mons at <:s,5 in the afternoon and proceeded
straight 70 his seat When his presence
WAS noticed he was greeted with tremen-
deus cheering.
Tho Premier wore . white rose in bis
lapel. the House of Commons was crowded
10 its utmost capacity at the hour Of Open-
hg.
Mr.. Gladstone. replying to q question on
the paper, said the Government would be
unable to promise to incorporate measures
for Home Rule government in England.
Wales and Scotland In the revised Irish
Home Rule bill when 1t should be brought
h during the autumn session, In the event
Of its passing second reading now.
The opposition loudly cheered John
Bright and Lord Harrington as they en-
tered and took their places.
The Parnellites were all In good voice,
and they gave Gladstone q most enshu-
siastic welcome. Every inch of space on
the main floor, Is well n in the galleries,
was occupied.
At noon hundreds Of seats had been a.
cured by hating fol- the closing debaee.
Hon. George J. GOschen. Liberal, re-
sumed the debate on the Home Rule bill.
He said the bill was to be Q message of
peace to Ireland, which tho Premier said
would be torn to fragments forthwith after
its second reading. The sovereignty OF
the Imperial Parliament depended
on . clause which it was highly
probable tho majority Of the House
would never consent to. II the bill passed
tremendous struggle would be inaugurated
by The Catholic clergy of Ireland for the
control Of education in that country. Re.
garding tho question whether the bill would
prove q final settlement OF the Irish diff
Guilty or lead to eventual separation.
G0schen said he did not think it would
provo q finality. That would depend en-
tirely on the assurances given by the Irish
members The Premier ut ono time was
supposed to have given . pledge to recon-
struct the bill. but he subsequently indig-
nantIy repudiated that assumption.
Gladstone interruptingly said: THAT is
gr0ss error. What the gentleman thinks
looked like Indignation was my eager repu-
diatiOn of the cool statement that had re-
solved to reconstruct the bill"
h. IL
tinctiOD, but was unable to see how the
Premier could avoid the difficulty. The
House was now informed that tho bill was
not to b. reconstructed. ICries Of "Or'
''Ov' and cheers, amidst which Gladstone
expressed signs of dissent. He wanted to
know il the Government was going to stand
by their bill or not Loud opposition
cheers. This state of doubt came from
voting not on the bill. but on the expIana-
ton first given at the Foreign Office and am
pified and explained away on the Friday
following. Further explanations to the an
swer were made on the ensuing Monday.
1t had also been elected in various letters
which had passed between the Premier and
his followers that tho reconstruction of the
bill was the basis on which many members
would unite in voting with the Government
on measure which everyone admitted was
the most important ever submitted to Par
lament. The opponents of the bill would
have achieved their result il the bill were
Withdrawn after it passed . second read
ing. If it passed that stage. The Premier
was now moro anxious to learn from his
supporters what they would authorize him
TO give, than to insist upon knowing what
the Parnellites would accept Cheers.]
His tone was different. 1t had been sho wn
that the British Parliament was not inclined
to consider Parnell its dictator. Loud
cheers.
Mr.. Parnell spoke 40 follows:
Il should ordinarily have lacked conf
dence in following so able and eloquent
think thrice Is no armed who hath lis
quarrel just cteers), and unequaliy in.
ferior a. am at many points, hope
shall not DO SC far behind As usual. Hear!
hear!1 Without ,intending to offer any
disrespect could not help thinking while
listening to his speech that, In all the lost
causes wherewith have seen him connected
during many years past he was never SO
little effective as when c0ntending against
the bill We hope to read second time to-
night ICheers. G0schen sought, think,
very unfairly, to cast q lurid light on
the situation by his alIusion to those I'M
happy outrages in Kerry. I join in the
expression Of contempt for those cowardly,
disgracefal practices l join him to the
fullest extent Hear! Hearl But
neither do say that because evictiOns have
been more numerous In Kerry than in all
the rest Of Munster put together during
months past, that constitutes an excuse for
those outrages, or any excuse for outrage.
though it may supply rs with causes Of
them. But when I denounce outrages,
den0unce them in every part of ireland.
whether in Ulster or Kerry. Hear!
'sGoschen is certainly FREQ from re-
proach. He has not Joined Lord Randolph
Churchill and Chamberlain in the use OF
reckless language in reference to the affairs
Of . country which is not their country
[cheersl, interference for which they had
not the paltry excuse thatit was any bust
ness of theirs or that they had any interest
therein. My colleagues have in times past
been reproached because they have not been
careful to look at the effect Of their lam
guage and doctrine. Indirect responsibility
has been employed against them to the ex-
tent of imprisonment II that doctrine Of
indirect responsibility is employed against
Lord Randolph Churchill or Chamberlain.
Lord Randolph Churchill ought To
plead the excuse that he believes
in nothing and nobody bur him
self 50 he could not expect any
great importance to be attached to his dec
iarations [cheers. laughterl while Chamber
lain might have said and said very truly
that he is absolutely ignorant Of all cir
cumstances in Ireland. His celebrated
projected visit there last autumn not hav-
ing come of, he really could nc: know
what would be the effect Of his language.
Cheers However, we have the result
now in one murder already committed in