The Bolivar bulletin. [volume] (Bolivar, Hardeman County, Tenn.) 1865-1888, 1886-08-27

ent by the tears in his eyes. As her
eyes meet her lovers, her tears burst out
afresh.
Grim, uncouth Michael Sehwab also
turned just in time to hear a heart-rend-
ing shrek from his wife, and saw her
fall against seat. He made a motion
toward her, but collected himself and
went out with the rest.
each GoTTl'' sHR1EKED THE WIFE.
each Gott?' Then her utterances took
the form OF rawlings, and she fell back in
dead faint. Restoratives were applied,
and when she regained consciousness
she resumed her cries. Some of her
female friends finally Quieted her. and
even the judge came down from the
bench and looked pityingly at her. She
was then taken out of the room, and the
others followed.
Mrs. Parsons did not seem very much
agltated, though she bit her lips and
looked at the judge and people with
strained eyes, as if striving to keep her
tears back.
Spies mother went out still weeping,
and clinging to her daughters dress, and
tears gushed from her eyes freely. 9th
er women wept, and the crowd in the
street stood aside in respectful manner
to let them pass.
Judge Gary came down shortly after,
hats as he passed. The courtroom was
cleared, and the people went away to
home and work.
The trial of the Reds was over.
Before adjournment Judge Gary set the
time for any motions by the defense for
next Thursday.
A reporter for the United Press found
a couple of jurors after they had made
their escape from the building, and
questioned them regarding their deIiber-
ations and differences. When they re-
tired to the jury yesterday after
noon the hrst thing agreed upon was to
keep their work, except as regarded gen.
eral information, a profound secret, for
reasons which they refused to diyulge,
but which they considered competent.
| A thorough discussion of the contested
points in the testimony was gone into,
as well as all the phases of the case
which the jury had become acquainted
with during the long siege. There
were some differences at first, but in the
main the jurors agreed upon the DISPOSE
! tiOn OF the prisoners. What their differ
ences were they will not tell. Then they
/ proceeded to ballot on each Of the Dris-
/ oners separately. The result of the first
| ballot, or any of them, or how many it
! took before a verdict was reached is mat
! ter which they will not give Information.
! They concluded their work and then had
| the verdict ready at half-past seven
/ O'Clock last evening before they left the
! jury-room for their supper.
''We had plenty of time for thinking
| the matter over during the trial, as the
| evidence was vOIumnOus and the argu-
ments exhaustive" said one of the ju-
rors; ''and we had come to look on the
matter passiOnately, and with no feel
ing for or against the prisoners. We
calmly reviewed the evidence, and found
our verdict accordingly. We did not
| consider that the claim that the throWer
of the bomb was acting independently of
the leaders was reasonable enough 10 ad-
nit OF judicial doubt, and even if he
was acting independently, it was the
teaching and preaching Of Spies and his
followers that caused him to throw it..
In any event, the murder was the out
growth of the infiammatory exhortatiOns
of the Anarchists.