New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1886-12-14
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS.
AN APPEAL FROM THE COURT or CLAIMS
4 SUIT GROWING OUT OF THE SOUTHAMPTON BANK
ROBBrRY


WASHINGTON Dec ia decision was rendered ey the su
prene United to-day In question OF some
interest the relations OF the United states
Supreme Court Court Of Claims The question was
raised by motion dismiss appeal from the Court OF
Claims IN the case United States against John Paul
that under the Law IA 1t stands no
appeal Judgment OF the Court Of Claims to this
conr entirely satisfied that the law stands
appeal. from the judgments of the Court Of
Claims this exercise Of the general jurisdiction.
The motion to dismiss is therefore denied.
decision also rendered by the to-day in the
OF Fanny wyle against the Northampton National Bank
This hal It's origin in the robbery OF the Northampton
Bank January % 1876 that time for safe
keeping were eight $1,000 bonds belonging to Mrs wyle.
which taken by the robbers together with the property
of the bank. Some sfterward Mrs wye opened nego
robbers with view recovering at least
part bonds by OF compromise The officers OF
the bank learning of these negotiations persuaded Mrs
wye break them of representing TO her that they them
communication with the robbers and hoped
eventually the Of the stolen property
including her bonds and that 1t would be better TO leave all
she now alleges that the bank failed proper
AMI ski IN eonduc these negotiations IN her behalf ana
haa taken the negotiations with the robbers ont OF her
not sustain Mrs wyies allegations and directed jury
find verdict for the bank The case &C @ here upon o Tns
holds the CT cult justified in its ruling the evil
rendered in the psen, Of Robert
the Northern Dstric Of nos This was SUIT BROUGHT ~
the alleged Infringement pa,snt granted 70 him
& rs.'asa patent MAS invalid e,
ventcn that set forth in the original patent
The other decisions to-day as follows;
johnson and StAsr s plaintiffs
the supreme Court of the state OF Illinois Judgment
p BENJAMIN Bu1erd and others APPELLANT as1 Rob
s e Decree
and e.s ID Ss eo@r and
Without prejudice 70 The tights Of plaintiff
coSa and os roS Se Circuit eOurs
United for the Western District Of Arkansa Decree
No sirThe %iamspOrt National Bank plaintiff error
to the Circuit coart Of the United states for the
No Asby appellant as Henry PaTc1on
Appeal Court OF the Territory Of Montana
Sie Campbell and others. plaintiff error agt
Of the Missouri aarned with costs
aPOs Railroad d eT # The "f nsd STATES M
for The southern District Judgment affirmed with
No 4e-The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company. plaintiff
9 ERR as GeSge IN so ID s eos anS S
demanded Tor further proceedings to be had therein LII con-
No 55"Chsres g PEPPER etc and others appellant
o1T Of M fGEee % for the Eastern pstrc Of ArSsn
sa decree reversed and case repandsd win 70
rsr ana s SDuc cS ,arf r TO nav H. own COSTS
in the Circuit Court and the costs PAID
hall by each OF the parties ..,,ou. ....u,o-. .,o
appellant agt the District OF Columbia Appeal iron The
No 5sTjohn Haisiea pianIid error agt. Sarah Bus
Ser nn M i srS OF Vest e an nemen tH reversed
and enanded the said District Court Tor
further proceedings.
5sO-M4ry Wilson, plaintiff in error, agt Robert
the Court OF the United states
FOR the District OF Nebraska Dismissed for the want oi us
dlcuOn.
No 7s7-Chares Brooks. plaintiff in agt Edward
In the Circuit Court OF the United states
for Eastern District OF Pennsylvania Judgment affirmed
with
y4S-Ihe Germania Insurance Company OF New-Or-
plaintiff the state Of Wisconsin In error
10 OF the United states for the Western
District Wisconsin. Judgment affirmed with costs
No 9jl-The Peoples Insurance Company OF NewOreans.
plantin error In error TO the
Circuit the Uned states for the District OF Wlscon
judgment Affirmed with
No. ia p Winchester trustee aud Others plaintiff IN er
aga HesAe ana others In error 10 the supreme
Tennessee Decree affirmed Win cOsts
No; lO7Y-John street appellant agt Ferry. Appeal
from the Court OF the Territory OF Ua Dismissed
for the want OF jurisdiction.