Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1886-12-13
WHOLE NO. l1,l22.

Corrigan says the summons was in the
form OF dispatch, simply stating that DIR.
McG ynn should come to Rome without
delay. Just when be will start. il was ex
planned. cannot now be stated No date
has been fixed, but of course he will oo
within reasonable tirne. His nlaca in
st. Stephens is not vacant, and no ARRANGE
ment has yet been made for filling il
in his absence. The question Of issue
IS not one OF politics: ii is not one of no.
lltcai economy; 1t is question of ethics,
or reiiglous philosophy and theology. This
is what is involved in this denial of indi-
vldual right of property in land which DR..
McGlynn holds, according to his published
statements. 1t IS on these that the charges
against him are based. In his last encyclical
the Pope makes perfectly clear the position
of the Catholic Church on this Question
when 1t says that the right of pronertv and
ownership shall be held intact and invio-
late This is the teaching of the Church.
DR.: McGlynn has spoken contrary to this.
ana must answer or explain his utterances.
me lact mat Dr. McGlynn was graduate
from the College of the Propaganda has
been given as reason for his being called
to Rome. He received his authority
priest from the College of Cardinals. and
has been stated that he was only answer
able to them. This, it was said Yesterday.
is not true. He is as much under the
ArchblShops control as any other priest.
Archbishop Corrigan could have punished
him by removing him from st. Stephens.
but such action would have left the matter
still unsettled, for DR.. McGlynn would have
had the night to appeal to Rome For this
reason the Archbishop thought it best to
have the whole matter decided by the
authorities at Rome. DR.. McGlynn yester-
declined m a 70 ofa
publication
THE REVEREND GENTLEMAN DISTURBED
NEW YORK, December 12th.-Father Mc-
Glynn has not yet started for Rome, and
there is no authority for saving he has. nor
that he has neglected to reply to the sum
mons sent through Archbishop Corrigan.
Father McGlynn refuses to talk Tor publi-
cation on the main question. The state
ment was published yesterday that when
asked whether he would go to Rome or not
DIR. McGlynn emphatically, and with a
stamp of his foot, replied, " No This re-
port" DIR. McGlynn said last evening
was an outrage. The only possible foun-
dation for the falsehood," declared Father
McGlynn, is that man calling himself
DR.. Higgins, of California stole an inter
view with me, and to his importunate
query, VIII you not make some statement,
not to be published in New York, but to be
telegraphed to California; (wbere he re-
minded me have friends and relations) 1
gave a somewhat emphatic Non DR..
McGlynn was engrossed with important
business yesterday, and it is said his time
is almost altogether engrossed with impor-
tant business. Whether it will be pre-
sented to the Pope by Father McGlynn in
person or otherwise, no one ventured to
say, and it has been asserted by friends of
the priest that he has not finally decided
himself
NO ALLUsIoN TO THE MATTER YESTERDAY.
New YORK, December 13th-A. NJ
Those who expected that any reference to
the question of DR.. McGlynn's summons
to Rome would be made in the pulpit OF
st. Stephens Church by Dr. McGlynn or
any of his priests yesterday, were disap-
pointed. DR.. Mclaughlin preached on
, Humanity" at the high mass, but neither
by allusion nor inference was the difficulty
of the pastor touched upon. AT the Cath
edral Rev. Father Lowell preached, but he
/ too was silent on the subject. Dr. Nc
Glynn's routine of priestly duties did not
differ from what it has been on any other
Sunday