Mexico weekly ledger., 1886-06-17
Big Base Ball Match in the Afternoon.
Senator COckrell
Has been invited to address the people,
Lemonade, Cigars, Ice Cream, ETC.,
ON THE GROUND.
Circuit Court Proceedings.
ON THE GROUND.

Circuit Court Proceedings.
City Of Mexico VS. W. II. White. YER
dict for defendant, Sl40.
j. w. Frazier VS. school district 2, 80,
10. Judgment by default for plaintiff,
Ss4.
Hamilton Brown Shoe Co. vs. M L.
Barker. Continued by consent.
John Crowley VS. Fred Seigle. Dis
missed.
w. w. Fry, assignee Of John Sontag.
Continued.
P. f. Locke, assignee of C. f. Yerger.
Continued.
James S. Rollins VS. Warren Mcintyre.
Continued by agreement.
Us. Henderson VS. Sallie Wright. Dis
missed.
H. M. Porter VS. M. C. Brown, ct al.
Continued.
Geo. NJ. Galloway VS. G. W. Galloway.
Dismissed.
Thurman & Hendrix VS. city of Vandalia.
Continued at defendants cost.
w. j. Lemp VS. Chalmer Green. judy
ment for plaintiff for costs.
Joseph Sewers VS. John Rapp. Dis
missed.
Levi Poor VS. unknown heirs Of Levi
Carter. Judgment according to prayer OF
petition.
j. A. Judy vs. A. B. Vance. Judgment
| for plaintiff, S330.4s.
Mexico Savings Bank VS. w. R. Cook,
ct al. Judgment for plaintiff for $192. &c.
Coin & Lockridge VS. w. r. Laforce.
Judgment for plaintiff for $780, 5.
Catharine A. Baily VS. city of Moberly
Continued.
Adam Roth VS. A. Kempinsky. Con-
tinued at defendants cost.
j. F. Callahan VS. j. and A. Rodgers
Continued.
John A. Judy VS. NJ. Y. Duncan. Con,
tinued.
E. S. Brewnleld VS. Phoenix Insurance
Co., of London. Judgment for plaintiff
for 81, o43. 80.
Margaret Carter VS. j. R. Long, ct al
Continued.
City of vandalia VS. Theron Stewart
Continued.
J. B. Botkin VS. b. B. Runkle, ct al
Continued. (.
w. R. Rodes VS.. B. B. Runkle, ct al
Continued.
Caleb Berry VS. c. E. Casper, ct a
Dismissed.
N. S. Gilchrist VS. J. NJ. Koontz. Con
tinued.
VIII. Logan VS. j. T. Cushman. Con
tinued.
Harriet Litonier VS. Fielding Sextor
Judgment for plaintiff.
A. D. Bledsoe VS. j. w. Brown. Judg
ment for plaintiff.
Pierre Forrissel VS. j. W. Lambert
Judgment for plaintiff for Sl91.7o.
City of Mexico VS. E. e. Jones. Con
tinued by consent.
j. M. Menefee VS. W. T. and M. ]
Lott. Judgment by default In favor
plaintiff.
w. A. Harris VS. city of vandalia. Dis
missed at defendants cost.
J. D. Morris VS. J. r. Baker. Dismis
sed.
7. S. Sneed VS. r. G. Galbreath. Cor
tinued by consent.
W. H. Garrett, ct al VS. Robert Ga
breath. Continued by consent.
The grand Jury has indicted w. ]
Barnes and j. E. Forshay for grand lal
ceny.
Gregory & Lane VS.. G. & A. r. r. c,
Verdict for plaintiff for S2l5.
John Wahl VS. Gustav Reusch. Lea,
to answer in 60 days and continued.
j. b. Botkln VS. Alex. Summers. Jud,
ment for plaintiff for S340.
Laura +. Robinson VS. Joseph Bolts,
al. Leave to answer in 60 days and col
tinued.
II. s. K~ratzinger, Lizzie Kratzinge
Proof Of publication and continued.
Joseph Hummer VS. Z. H. Flumme
Divorce granted.
Frank Tompkins VS. unknown heirs
L. B. Kellogg. Proof of publication a,
interlocutory judgment.
J. II. Jones VS. G.. & A. r. r. Co. Lea
to answer in 60 days and continued.
Audrain county VS. Chas. II. Melvin,
al. Leave to answer in 60 days and co
tinued.
Lincoln University VS. George Robi
son. Leave to answer in 60 days al
continued.
Alice Clayton VS. John Clayton. /
Observation-Disclosures and continued.
Mary B. johnson vs Edward McNan
Leave to answer in 60 days and CO
tinued.
e. RI. Crissman VS. John w. Atchise
Leave to answer In GO days and co
tinued.
Albert G. Widdecomb W. Willard Bs
ton. Leave to answer in 60 days a
continued.
W. X. Beck VS. Masonic Mutual Bene
Association Of Missouri. Leave to an
wer In go days and continued.
FL Thomas Carmody ct al, vs. VIM. ri
d kead. Leave to answer In GO days a
J. continued.
al Thomas Carmody vs. G. N. Wales ct
Leave to answer in GO days and cont,n
ed.
u David p. Daniel VS. J. w. Carson. Lea
y to answer In 60 days and continued.
m Elizabeth L. e. Morton, ct al,
|. Samuel Z. Kendall ct al. Leave TO answ
in 60 days and continued.
James Richardson VS. Samuel =. r,
mer ct al. Leave to answer in 60 ds
and continued.
&C. Clark, ct al VS. J. r. Poor.
~terlocntory Judgment and continued.
Sealed proposals. viii be receiv
until IL O'Clock noon Saturday, Jul
26tb, 1885, for repairing Sunrl
~~.h z rrtixa u1~sh - No~snn ~