New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1886-12-15
IS HE A FRIEND OF KEENAN, 7
CHARGES AGAINST JUROR ROSENBERG.
THE MauADH CASE ALLOWED TO GO oS-MR. MAR

inss yesterday. The Juror concerning whom the H.
furious statements made Is Jacob Rosenberg. who
has occupied the niuh scat He Is tailor having shops
In Puitons, Nassaust, aud ip Brooklyn and Pnadel-
mia Tho nrm IL Rosenberg Brothers. and Mr..
Marines detectives say that the membefs Of the firm
inherited th-r bushes. from their father aud have
always borne god reputation. Jacob the brother
who tho jury, 10 understand and has low forehead
and red sidc- whiskers He 10 not attractive 10 appear
ance hui Sergeant Reilly who investigated his character
reported be we'll thought Of by those who had
business dealings with him.
The charges against hun were made by J. W. Wicker
nan and I. J. Nesbtt WIN formerly employed by
Rosenberg Brothers. and Who were discharged or left
their employers and have started In business TOR them
selves the shor In which they formorey worked.
These after thor ha made statements b" newspaper
men seeursd a wide notice for themselves, vent to
the DistrctAtorney's ONCE yesterday and mado state
mems which taken down by Assist,nt District
Attorney ID wis II their statements true Juror
Rosenberg mist have been guilty OF making untrue
statements on bis examination juror Ho then sa
that the only among those mentioned by Assistant
District Auorney-Nicol whom he knew WIRE Farley.
knew only little.
Mr. viosernans statement was to the effect that john
Keenan, WIS we'll known to Jacob Rosenberg. He said
In substances;
81 WIS employed by Mr.. Rosenberg for seven ysars
aud know Jacob Rosenb' rg we'll have seen John
Keenan, IN Roscnbcrg's store than lie oamo
at ono limo and bought large amount OF olothing
Morris Rosenberg took his Mr. Sesbt cut the
clio aud think tnat jacob ospnbers received the pay
ment Ex-Ass~inblyma Moses Dinkelspiel, who IS
relative OF kUsouoergs wife and who was frcnd OF
Keenan, introduced him to Rosenberg Diukelpsicl aud
KosenDrrg said they had uecn vt John Keen ms place
do not know that John keen<n got permission Tor
Rosenberg pa. up his ssus and awnings but II was
alw IS supposed that he d Rosenberg said ouue that
there hardly man In o thousand that would uot
bo0de. and he did not think tuat t was mdrn OF
Rosenberg nsed % boast OF hi, friendship for
es-AlLermen Smells ami Farley He would come down
aud boast OF having drunk wtne with Sseis
n.asapt times that he had with shells and Parisy
have SAID tns lid not believe thai there wond be any
ouuvictoD rs knew that JACOB hosenoerS was ir1eho
OF Jouu kesnan."
Mr.. Nesbtt VINO formerly cutter for Rosenberg
Brothers, made statement similar to that OF Wicker
an. He said that Dinkelspis personally intro duced
Keenan and Jacob Rosenberg, that afterward Keenan,
ana Rosenberg became gooi friends. ami that Jacob
osen berg often spoke Of the tmss that hs had
with Keenan Shells aud Farley He Talked of 1t muon
tiat the talk became He spoke OF wine that
Was paid out OF the Doodle money
Morris Rosenberg, the brother Of the Juror and Mr..
Strauss his denied that there had boon
any intimacy between John keenan, and Jacob Rosen-
bery TheJ SAID that keenan, had bought n lot Of cloth
ing valued at 500 from the ssoo, but Morris Rosenberg
thought that Jacob did much To do with Keenan,
At time They declared that Viekeman aud Nesbitt
are discharged statesmen, and that thoy nave started
business place tue place whore they were employed
and desire TO the business Of Rosenberg Brothers.
three OF the Statesmen employ Oh py hosouoeTB
Brothsrs testified keenan, did not frequent the
Mr. MARITIME while considering that tue statements
we're complete Of wrong doing ON the part Of
Jacob Rvsonuerg much greved at the CHARGES AMI
especially at that part OF the statement that seemed "
Indicate that juror had strong ceiling against the
taking OF brbes Ho has had difficulty in nnding
uror, YIN had high isea Of the sacrrdness official
oath perform duties 10 the city, He was III dou't lOr
a tine whether might not DO well to Withdraw
nd HALL "A
Mt Ncv AMI Colon' Fello"s uad long ANA earnest us-
but it wa' finally doci led ony 70 prepare Tue
Lueir testimony might bs priest rVeu As tue taAius
OF testimony flushed AMI tho trial was ou-
seo,,rntly almost ov r. there little causing
70 hi reasonably dou"tu whetnor there had been any
miss tstements on the part 81 The juror.
WINDING UP THE TESTIMONY.
Aside from tho proceedings relating to this Juror the
scenes tho closing of tho taking of testimony were hot
reuars able. Tus crowds ia attendance we're larger
than usual Jobn Lotus, foreman with the New-fork
Central railroad company Was the hrst witness. he
te~tined that lived No Asa West Tuirtyfourthst
IA tho with OK Alderman McLou4niIn frou
MAY 1888, IL Ju,e 1885. ihe street Was not lone
some one, had In mAtsi ny the prosecution. Ito
saw McLougnln every DAY or two tie was a1sout from
tho nOuao paFr "l the suinner ana the hou'e Was
close from the -Hd OF July until september tugran
aud Duny had testified tnat there Was meeting at tue
IN August On cOss-exaihinduh III NieOn ASKED
whether wnoss had not raid III conversation WI
representative VI TIA prosoeu,ion that no vas ia the
only Two or iee evoniss III 'wo 0t three weeks
anu con equeutly did know much about wat hap
penud lie said that he frequently out VI Tue
bouse IN the evening but MT lar away He SAID that
Oricor Robinson had spoken OF The mysterious dis
appearance OF tho servant VINO hal lived with tho Lotus
william j. Cawiey, who lodged at McLoagLn's house
N losi ieshhed tIa' an no saw rais.sn tw,ee a. al
luerman thore lLs witness Was meinber with
XVIII District Mr. Grnoy. VINO con iucted the examiDa-
out ais foot In a tight place bJ AsHinx: o.
ven ion in July, 1854. lbs been tesed did
A. No, sir. he Dad MT know thai PERSONALITY
= .toment II you knew tnai 1t w~s Joseph steiner ia
witness for tho defence and aIso a member Of tho
Iammany Hal Committed had testified 10 that FAC !
A-No, sir, 1t would not
Mr. Nlcos urtner questions brought our the activity
OF Mr. CASH., OF tho rsDmany Hall Com mill ee OF 1854.
wro LAD mentioned TOY otuor Tituesse. Tor the
fence oneavoug to obtain tie evidence OF MoLough-
FREDERICK : word reporter, called. ana In spite
of tie objection OF General Tracy testnsa t.nt he sa
Aurl aud June, 1886. Keenan,, Dempsey and Do Laos
we're at hotel aud uolonc} at anotner.
Mr. NewcomDo theh produced staoment that the
Cass Sr1sI Ir and IN. n
omitted 10y consrnt. John sparks. he clerk OF tue
Court OF Central sossions was called ny MT NcO, who
wIsnru To asa un soout tue proceedings In
uuony AS to the forfeiture of bail to 10 given
either side aud Mr. Newcomoe had alrra handed u
ecuruer Smyth the sheets which were written the
sIty-thtee requests charge. with wncn the defencs
desired 10 mae the EecOrier unhappy.
Mr. MARITIME however, Interrupted the proc settings 20
say 10 TIE Keuordrri
A matter vi great mportance which may have In
Bueucs NV further action In tots CASE has been
drought attention. | ask that roUe's be taken
now Tor longer time than USUAL la ordcr that may
have opportunity to consult my Associates and deter
mlns future action. 1t Is q question whether NO
snoud now VITA the further poeeseinss or sbood
pi the aud Jury while consa concerning rhis
matter
TINS efereuce tho charges Affecting Juror Rosenberg
wa understood By except the Jurors, VINO had
OF course not allowed 10 ieai anything CONCERNING
n Nj. Newcombe male no objection aud Recorder
SMITH directed adjournment from IL 80 TO y.
Tho occupied in perfectns tns arhdavits In
The Rosenberg matter.
john 4. Rooiuson, employed by Detective Reilly TO
make some Investigate - Ia tie witnesses IN hv case,
Was alt.rwafd called by Nj. Nco to contradict state
ment OF a witness Tor the defence.
RosENBERG's ACCUsERs IN COURT.
Mr. MARITIME tnen said: The prosecution rests" aud
General Tracy to mako formal motion. when Mr.
Martina Amin rnse and haidl