Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1886-09-08
CrvrE JuRT DOCKET.
Apporsionmsnt OF the own Jury Docke, In
District Court. septem Der Term, 1856

lsh MT johnson ct al VS. Edward
Rudd ct al.
ct al. ~
2Sls u Tye ct al VS. Il w Tye ct al
1917 PJ Willis Bro VS. Robert Me-
Cart, assignee.
s4i4 Rober, Mozart, assignee, VS. A !
Norton.
24S4 Charles NORM vsT&PRR.
2450 Damuse NORM VS. T&PRR.
2i66 Tidball, vanZAndt & Co VS. B ID
Buford & Son.
24s4 WA Aaron VS. II S Broiles et al
24sb W A Aaron VS. City OF Fort
Worth.
262i W C Baird VS. G, c6sFRR.
1926 w L Dorsey vs. G, cas- FRI
1864 L II True VS. t &RPR.
272l d Peck VS. W u Tel Co.
1858 ID Welborne ct al VS. Tw We'll
borne ct al.
1888 William Wood VS. w "A HUFFMAN.
2S60 Hslsell VS. w L Halsell.
1886 J G Lowell VS. Thomas Roach.
29l0 NJ Nj Lester vs. L PR.
29l6 Pryor Bros VS. G, &SFRR.
29Il Hitson & Reed VS. Fort Worth
Pub Co.
1912 j T. Templeton VS. Sam Evans.
FIFTH WEEK --NoNDAY, OCTOBER IL, 1856.
29S5 VIM McConkey vs. + W 6 ID G r.
r.
1856 j b LaLonde VS. &PRR.
29S8 Il Il lizard VS. M Mathis ct al.
2989 M + Connor VS. T &PRR.
1906 A A Stephens VS. A r Cornelious
et al.
299s CE Behee VS. MoPR
1901 ] I Day VS. + W err.
S0C2 II II Cornwall VS. Mo PR.
3005 Belle Fowler VS. d Reed ct al.
1907 WI Wildervs Texas Investment
Co ct al
SOl2 jaw II Terrell VS. Fw &DCR
r..
SOlS r h Maddox VS. Billings ct
al.
S026 Bateman Bros VS. L Scoggin.
5000 Traders National Bank VS. Fore,
Morphy 6 Henderson.
S0s9 Hunter, Evans & Co VS. Lacy &
Anderson.
SO72 T witten VS. Fort Worth Street
Railway.
3Osl W L Rail VS. City National Bank
S0S6 j Jarvis VS. + w &DRR.
5000 II + Armstrong, assignee, ys w
T Maddox ct al.
1892 L Rupe VS. L NJ Daggett ct al.
3ll9 VIM Fahey VS. IL Morrow.
1923 M G Foster ct al VS. S Evans.
SIXTH WEEK, MONDAY, OCT. is, 1886.
Sips VIM Oliver ct al VS. T & p X II.
1929 NJ I Binson ct al VS. Sam Field
ct al.
$3.50 NJ T Binson ct al VS. Sam Field
ct al.
3l45 B Lester VS. b Thompson
ct al.
/ u II Of
| 3l6l A Sinclair VS. M A Cooper ct al.
1852 f p Andrews VS. w Lipscomb
ct al.
8l65 Leon Kohn VS. Stone Cattle and
Pasture Co.
| 3l79 ] NJ Laws vs. j p Smith ct al.
1881 p ] Jarvis VS. M p X r.
1884 p Hennessey VS. M p X II.
3l96 S L Theilman VS. j p Hughes
& Co.
3l99 FW Shelton vs. I & z X r.
1901 T j Walsh VS. W A Huffman.
1920 in Delhi VS. M L Thyng ct al.
1922 Geo II Dicks VS. p Smith.
1927 JEW Lane vs. 7 & z r Il.
1921 John Behrens VS. 4 Hickey
ct al.
1896 RI Davis VS. Mrs II Blles ct al
S246 Curtis & Atkinson vs. J M Mathis
ct al.
1853 X L Armstrong VS. Thos Roche
1868 John Huffman ct al VS. T Il Ridge
way ct al
S270 r Thompson VS. TT W & ID G X X
1919 Mrs M Hall VS. M S Il & B A OF A
1878 Traders, National Bank vs
Smith.
1926 Nancy Harris vs. S B Halsell ct al
1902 Jake johnson VS. w II Aldridg
ct al.
SSOS NJ Harrison VS. City of For
Worth.
Worth.
SEVENTH wEEK-MoNDAY, OCT. 20, 1885
33i7 FH Reynolds vs. 7 & p r X.
$500 j w Cartwright vs. p Pfout
ct al.
$500 John Mcculloch VS. Tex Inves
Co, limited.
SS25 Central Type Foundry VS. Gazett
1926 Z A Blount ct al VS. J p Smit
ct al
$3.50 JY Hogsett, admir-, VS. L B Dag
gett.
1894 Ell Mathews ct al We M n Sewer
1896 o S Kennedy vs. A r Embry ct a.
1899 NV Miller VS. VIM Caps.
,, SSIi Half, Weiss & Co VS. Julia
: Field.
1852 w Handy VS. I 6 7 RI
1856 VIM Muller VS. W G French.
:, 1857 John Flint vs. Gazette PrintiD
: Co.
, $3.50 B C Evans Co VS. Crawford
Stanley ct al.
3404 Chic & Lonegincotti VS. Boa]'
34O5 Same VS. d Boaa.
J S40s Texas Stone Co vs. 7 X,
s4ll City OF Fort Worth VS. A M Brit
ton ct al.
34l3 will Levi VS. g, G & s + X X;
3U4 id Reed VS. Ft w ID 9 TX.
4 EIGHTH WEEK, MONDAY, NOV. i lee,
: S447 j C Bennett VS. city Fort WORT
) S452 L f Whitaker VS. John Glenn.
q. aa-ohl Y w e Id Z, III X.