New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1886-06-30

Mr. GOODIES PART IL THE SCHEME
The application was to be passed upon by Mr. Gooie
Although the Pan-Eectric Company mad no time TO lose
because they wanted to use the Government SUIT TO de-
feat mum motion that was 10 10 heard on Sep
tember Is al Baltimore they nevertheless stopped all
their efforts weeks until Mr. GOote, who had
been In the North west returned to Washington and Mr.
Garland leave. 1t 10 stated In tho report
that each OF the petitioners had pending SUITS IN whch
they could have proved against the II Company all
grounds 10 sldate the patent and they coud nave
made their deiences. In their own wsy. and IA
them argued by their own COUNSEL III inc supreme
there According TO Mr. Young. however. tey did not
want to to trial. II they had defence whcn
psrea,. Dot to bleed it or course just the duty
Of the Department OF Justice 70 stop snch aschehe-
GER sinly not to let itself DO dragged into IT,
III. next meeting OF these parties wa, al Memphis
In the latter part Of Angus. 1885. As soon as Mr.
In the name OF the Government. and printed
1t before PERMISSION TO me WAS gwen
Attorney at Jackson Tenn. and he wrote to Washing.
ton permission tosue enclosing all the papers and
they 10 Washington by the tram thar carried the
letter. On arriving at Washington Mr. Young together
with Senator Harris, wno Dad been 10y .eo
that the IL all had net arrived After nqury ABOUT Tue
papers they depar'cd. went again the next mornng.
assed II the papers had come; Mr. Goode replied That
he was that moment writing order that the suit be
brough In accordance with the request appointing MI
Young aud otbor special counsel 10 prosecute Ii and
they turned on Iner heels aud ie'I Inc b was hieu
septemDer9 at Memphis instantly Mr.. Van benthuy :
sen, OF the promoters published In the newspapers
tina; the snee OF would De to stop the Bel COMPANY
from nfngsrs and as soon asa copy could be got
20 Baltimore off rod to the court there as reason
why snouid deciue even to hear notion for iuJunc.
oD. Tse d-regsrded The attempt 10 nuzre H. OF
course When matter 10 tue knowledge OF the
community II produced considerable str Upon strong
suggestion, amounting TO an orisr by the Tue
sut dismissed upon the ground that II had not been
preceded by proper inquiry subsequently, october a.
Inc DisicAttorney renewed his request Tor leave to
bring suit
CommsnIiDx upoG Mr. Goodies share in tue transac-
ton. stated IN the report tnAt Mr. G0ode vas APP
pointed TO once In May. though NOT yet continued
by the Senate In June he went IL British Columbia on
admission for the Department, aud Appeared again al
his ONCE August 20 Mr. Garl-ud WA then
expecting TO 60 away for BIZ weeks vacation.
Mr. Goodies statement Ia that during the
week they both at the Office Mr Garland
hsd y conversation with him OF business matters al
a II would not De- Tolerate that private counsel
sIould egoct the interests OF AT important private
CLIENT and IL cannot BE- beloved that MI Goode can
have done respecting the interests OF the United
ese Mr. GoOde that he did not confer with The
chief clerk any about the request OF the Dsrc
Attorney on the sebject Of It, The subject was new te
hum. and he WAS the Office. II WAS bis business
70 Ascertss what the practice was ID such matters
tnd II he had asked he would nave found
that he could not have granted ias application within
twentyfoor hours and without Reference without Act
Ing 10 dsregsd Of the practice and requremsnu OF the
offce.
Mr.. ooede states that he carefully read tho papers
eabHitted They consisted Of . mass-ehieny Of man a.
Asdpt-vhish ssw nakss 1le pages Of print In sad'