The sun. [volume] (Morris, Stevens County, Minn.) 1882-1895, 1886-05-27
DiSrRlcTcou2T.

After an interesting session OF four
days district court WAS adjourned TIL
June 2lst, 1885. During the term tlles|
cases disposed Of were rs follows:
The Minnesota Linseed Oil Co vs. john Ma
ginnis. AttoI ney for plaintiff, SpOOner-
for defendant, Brown 4 Chew. judgment
for plaintiff
=, c 4, Bank Of waverly, Nv York, vs.
w Walker. Attorney for plaintiff, Spoon
er-for defendant, Brown u Chew.
Judgment for plaintiff.
Pittsburgh Agricultural Works VS. Jno Ma
ginnis and Chas Masinnis. Attorney for
plaintiff. Geo Darling-for defendant, Brown
& Chew:
Michigan stove Co. vs. Good 4 Brisbine.
A.tys. Tor plf., Spoontr Il Flaherty-for
Jefts., Brown 4 Chew.
Tried by jury and verdict for defendants
Charlie Z Collins VI Marion Stevens. At
torney for plant Il. Is w Smith-Spooner
Fiaherty.
-Settl ID
c Brown VS. T J Moore. Attorneykfor
Spooner-for defendant, Brown Chew.
Judgment for defendant.
Emily Studdard VS. Geo Newell / Co. At
torney Tor plaintiff, Jno A Gillinan-for de-
PENDANT, spooner, Darling aud Flaherty'
The Minneapolis Harvester Works vs. John
D Coed. Attorney for plaintiff, Ripley
Morrisou-tor defendant Brown 4 Chew.
Continued by consent.
Ann NJ Wilcox VS. c W Comstock. Attor-
ney for plaintiff. L Z Spooner-ior defendant
Brown 4 Chew.
Judgment for plaintiff.
Mccormick Harry. sting Machine Co vs Jno
E McCarron. Attorney Tor plaintiff, 8 A Fla
herty--ior defend INT, John E McCarron.
Judgment for plaintiff on failure OF defend
ant to appear.
Milwaukee Harvester Co vs. STEVENSON
| Bros and L s Myers. Attorney for plaiptiif,
J. c Spooner-for defendant, H Steenerson.
Judgment for plaintiff on failure OF defend
ants to appear.
NJ Moran vs. Alex Moran. Attorney for
plaintiff, Mnrphy-for defendant, l. G
| Spooner.
Tried by jury and verdict for defendant.
Willis White VS. II Hardy and VIM Hy-
land Attorney for plaintiff, Geo & Darling -
for defendant, Brown Chew.
VIM Dserins " Henry Rierdon. Attorney
for plaintiff, Geo L Da,ling- for defendant,
Hodgson Il Young.
! --DaS missed.
| John Nucent VS. John McCarten Attorney
for plaintiff, Brown 4 Chew-for defendant,
3 A Flaherty.
Tried q BY jury aud verdict for plaintiff for
Chas Maginnis VS. J " REYNOLDS. Attor-
dant, " Reynolds.
CAultman VS. o Belts Attorney for plain
tiff, S A F!aherty-for defendant, Crawford &
Judgment for plaintiff on default
Smith Scoieidvs The Village OF Morris.
Attorney for plaintiff, Brown Il Chew-for
defendant. Geo Il Darling.
--Tried by jury and verdict for plaintiff for
$l23 05.
State Of Minnesota. ex rel, Smith P Scofeld,
vsF E Newell, president of the Village Of Nor
ris Attorney for reiatOr, Brown Il Chew
for defendant, Geo E Darling. .
Proceedings BY m .ndamus argued and
submitted.
A c Brown VS. Chas Bush. Attorney for
Z Chapman.
Referred to C. L. Brown to hear aud report
Judgment; tried and submitted.
CRas Croonquist VS. Dan Leonard. At.or-
ney for plaintiff, Brown 4 Chew-tor defen-
O-To' be submitted by parties on stipulation of
facts.
Knud Anderson VS. Mary J Walker. At
torney for plaintiff, Brown Il Chew-for de-
PENDANT, Geo Darling.
Tried by jury, and verdict for plaintiff for
Sl4O. 90.
In the case of the State vs.. Dohm-
strlck the question as to the constitu-
| VI GuO Sl0GuCO ling GAL
roads which have been in use for more
than six years public highways, whe-
Their laid out or not, argued and sub.
mitted.
State VS. McCrory was continued by
consent.
At the adjourned term, in June, the
following cases will be tried by jury:
Chris Stahlmsn Brewing Co VS. William
Noting. Attorney for plaintiff, Jno W Willis,
= for defendant, C Spooner.
Same VS. Elmer Bemis and VIM Noting.
Attorney for plaintiff, John w Willis-for de-
PENDANT L c Spooner.
YAM. Griggs & Howes vs. H Hutchins. At
torney for plaintif, B Shipman-for defen-
dant, Spooner & Brown.
Mary Walker vs. Flatner: Attorney for
plaintiff, Geo E Darlington defendant. S A
Flaherty.
Smith scofeld vs. The Village Of Morris.
Att'ys, Brown & Chew, and Geo Darling.
State ex. rel. P Scofeld VS. Frank Z New
ell, President OF the Village of Morris.
Ryan Drug Co vs. Chris Hagen. Attorney
for plaintiff, VIM C Bicknell-fOr defendant,
Hodgson & Young.