Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1886-05-18
hmm 3. FARMER.
S+om Sirtk Page.
and give satisfaction

geople nart without individual
sss. ~ u croosrruption Of the govern
Iii ne FUSED U1 By lack OF individ-
5 sst = I he management OF the
4 caIl your attention to a
~ nov y. 80" ss,,tracted this investi-
k'ls ,,. That the testimony SHOWS
's ~, obstruction Of property 10
s,', s, inc. engines and ditching
~ hH snS serious injury to the
|sl y 4. sn road engaged in earning
/ <, z ". ny m me deprivation Of others
| llls0s D Vi, Interference in the way
|Insn' = / understand from your
3 .' ,..,oiore given that no SUCH
\ .l sns. meet your APPROVAL A.
!, Il vou still further whether
~. ~ knight Of Labor, II any
., s,y be-, who we're engaged ia
Il @r ,Iolepce Is not an enemy TO
/ y y, ~ MA orderg A. Yes, sir;
NV y labor who deralled a train,
l,s !, o., q the kind, is an enemy
Lrcinles OF the order do not
|.la 's scis, but on the contrary "a.
+ Sntctly the reverseE a. ina'
s,suding Of them
y your theory or suggestion
i SINNER in which the govern
n nbtsIn possession of the raw
wsIl, ii might be done by
!. .he owners would refuse to
a ..osa YOU would recognize the
nan owning property A. l
impose the government would
Suder the laws OF eminent
!, state a little further what
p II that. A. The right to con-
IS ,.IiutIons OF the government TO
forests Of the people.
,bst does not give me infor-
4 whether they would, accord.
suggestion, akepossession OF
M compensation. A. | think
IN where there has been actual
n road, the company should
"A actual Investments.
would determine the amount
\, A. II is possible a com
ISM be appointed and the tes-
lected as to the real invest
E Be rosd.
YOU considered in this con
fearful danger there would be
! trlpg people to increase the
re class, so manifold as 1t
.i5a all employees in railways
slcers Of the United Statesp
thought Of that.
ID concede that there would be
Eai A Well, it would be
4 arrangement Of the laws of
II the law was so arranged
Rtt have what we call in these
sryice reform, and 3 man 5
Ibid not be questioned as to
bent by the government, l see
her.
5nehsuan:
theory Is that the government
Quire either by purchase or
Oa under the right of eminent
IcA condemnation would carry
necessity Of compensation?
ne railways of the country9
an would the purchase Of the
bid, by the people OF the
4 BY the government, the
N government is simply the
and the concentration of the
ecolntryp A. Yes, sir.
4 en- your desire is that the
] lhls country should be taxed
railroads? They cannot be
: Fihout compensation. How
ntsns be provided? A. Il
4 taxation, Of course.
at taxation would fall upor
< the producing class, woulC
= Yes, sir.
bon ali the laboring class
A. Yes, sir.
~ would you pay the pur
4 By the issue of bonds, o
A BY a larger circulatin!
! we have; 1t might be sup
eat extent for the benefits o
you have an issue of bond
! ase Of these roads2 A. No
you advise the issue o
a lor the purchase OF thes
Y, 10 Q certain extent.
would you do for the re
! ~ purchase money? A. l
\ 4 best TO carry these road
Y Y q the government at once
, Il some time to do that.
plcly would you apply it
" [pldlI as the ability OF tn
y Eould be to take charge O
phe bonds might be issue,
\ Tease.
!, y made any calculation a
loi money necessary to b
I people Of the United State
y Duio and Vanderbilt and 9th
lioads they now own? A.
some about 1t.
4 now much would it take
\ state.
N lo' take a sum larger tina
! Atot was at the close of tn
'Ould to purchase the raj
q a.rstaad you are in favor c
M s s A. Yes, sir.
w nssn as formulated OF a
81 2 answer.
a. ''sA q Dependency"
|. ~ aIe wallowipp on accom-,