The Memphis appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1886-1890, 1886-06-12

ford and Sir Charles Dixie parties to
the prOc,or's suit to enable them 10 be
heard by counsel.
MR. PA2EELL
has requested the publication OF the
following: 81 positively deny that
sought toe interview with Ear Carnar-
Won. / also differ with the Earl as 10
two conditions upon which he alleges
was based the interview, namely, that
he was &C ing entirely on his own
responsibility, and that be declined to |
hear or say one word to the detIlment
of the union. Earl OsTnsrvon did not
lev down airy conditions previously
| admit there was foundation Tor the
third condition mentioned, that IS,
that he hoped it was under
stood that be was not engaged
in making any treaty or ba'-
gal ns. Egrl Carnarvon taid he
sought the interview to ask my views
as to a constitution for ireland IL
was socn obvious that he wished 10
give his own views. Replying to an
ilquiry in regard to the proposal to
establish centrallegislature, founded
upon county boards, | said that did
not think Irelsnd would accept that
as a settlement; that the central body
ought 10 be Parliament in name and
fact, having power to deal with the
local government OF counties. Earl
Carnaryon stated that this was
his own view, adding gr atty
TO the weight of irish opinions. He
81 o suggested basing the Parliament
at Dublin upon the colonial model
His opinion upon this point struck me
as being tie Ie.u,t of much thought
aud study. remarked that the pro
lection of certain Ilish industries iIom
English and foreign competition wonld
be absolutely necessary. The Ear
replied 81 entirely agree with you
hut what a row there will be II
J England" 1 then left, believing
that we wers in complete accord upoor
the main outlines Of plan for th'
se,tlement of the question OF the gov
eminent OF Ireland. l have reason L
: believe that the Earl impressed M
1 views upon the Cabinet, aud tina
( many of hiI colleagues shared hi
d views 81. o that the Earl resigned tn
e Lord Lieuteuancy Of Ireland becaus
: we did not give the Conservatives
4 msiority at the polls. / spoke. a
wicklow, and aced during the cleo
j tions under the impression that ha'
3 gained from that interview.
d Mr.. Parnell, in an interview thu
Q evening, said he did not intend
n Issue a nantes o, but after the dis.
e Luton Of Parliament he would delivt
addresses at Dublin and Cork, ]
v which be would fully enunc ale n
z viewH.
NE JUSTIN MCCARTHY
e, has furnished for publication a lett'
NJ in which he says: "A friend OF Loi
T. Carnaryon's came 10 me and to-
e. me that Lord Carnarvon was an
r. ious to learn MIR. Parnells vls'
OF on the subject OF the government
hs Ireland. He asked il l would see u
~ Esrl first. At his instance l saw az
ne held long interchange OF ideas WI
We Lord Carnsrvon. 1t would not do hi
re- the slightest injury with any class
on Engljshmen il every wo'd OF our co
as yersation were placarded in the psla
yAId. The resu was that pTomls
10 ask Mr.. Parnell to meet Lord o.
hit navon. Mr.. Parnell preferred not
adj. meet him at an intermediary hon
The Earl readily asseDted to Mr.. r
nell's wishes and meeting followed
AN the formers residence. l was absent, /
M. ParneIl's description OF the int
oe' view exactly correspondent with
no, clear recollection Of the couversati
leu which | myself had had wit h the IN
no. | explained to him clearly that lrels
en-. did not desire the repeal OF the uni
last but would not be satisfied unless
ue- was granted her own Pariamt
les- Lord Oanarvon rep led, speaking o
eu. for himself, that he was prepared
!, 90 as far in the direction OF home
10 as Parnell or mysef de'ired to
Ish' The Earl asked for a second interv
que with Parnell, but lean that they
Gie not meet sgain."
ai. THE MIDLOTHIAN UNIoNlsrs
to sent a deputation to the Marquis
isla- Harrington to-day to ask him to 81
sails them in putting forward UnioniI
ling oppose Mr.. Gladstone in the con
lete election. Lord Harrington replied
lent he would rather see the Liberal Vi
and, split than harass the Premier.