Springfield globe-republic. (Springfield, Ohio) 1884-1887, 1886-02-03
COURT HOUSE.
Another i.sbsi SUIT brought this Morning
THIRD Assignment for January Terra
Other Nose-s


THIRD Assignment for January Terra
Other Nose.,
By his attorneys T. q. and G. 5. Dial,
Geofge W. Brown, proprietor Of a teed
store, this morning filed 4 petition la eonl-
uon pleas. asking for judgment in the sun
of sI,ooO agsinst T. f. Hsrwood. proPrie-
tor Of the Springfield Gazette, for alleged
malicious iiSel. published In that paper last
Monday in the following language. 'George
Brown. feed store ksepsr, deliberately
walked of with Fin Thomas overcoat Sat
arday night while the latter was getting his
mug shaved. Same was told 20 officer Nor
ton, who informed Mr.. Brown II he did
not hand over the coat he would
plaee him in jail Brown Immediately
turned the oyerooaf over TO lis owner
The petition further states that the said
statement has injured his reputation and his
business, upon which he is dependent for
his livelihood.
Nc cases were tried in common pleas to
day. After calling the roll OF jurors this
mornIng, Judge White dismissed them until
O'Clock tomorrow morning.
This morning Judge White announced
she
Third a sal snmsnt January Term. isss.
MONDAY, FER. Is.
E7aa. wm. II. McClintcck Vs. Wm. Jobes
ct al
7Tes. Mary Mccarthy vs.. City Of Spring
field
T7ss. Alice S. Totten vs.. Grand Lodge
A. o. L, W.
77ps Frank Lang vs. VIM. II. Golden.
7soO. l.. J. Hickey vs.. Pelton & Way.
TUESDAY, FEB, 10.
7s02. Jerome Stevenson ct al. vs. VIM. d.
Baker, sheriff.
1908. Benjamin Mershon vs.. Frank F.
Gilleti,
7soS. J. Shields & Co. vs.. Julius Ksuf-
man.
7sOs. John Nicholson w. l. b. 4 W. Ry.
| Co.
5sO9. Elite HuIlinger vs.. r. c. & ST. L.
Ry. Co.
WEDNESDAY, FEB. IL.
7sIs. Harvey Swadener vs.. wm. Swsd,
euar.
Ts32. N. II. Patterson vs. E. G. Coffin,
admir-. ct al
7saS. Patrick MuIlAhy vs. l. r. & W. Ry.
Co.
7s40. Rinehart & Newton vs. B. F. Funk
& Co
7s4i. W. II. Smith & Son vs.. Bowman a
BreckbEll.
Tss4. Slower Mfg Co. vs.. J. c. Durbor
TOW & Co.
/ THURSDAY, FEBRUARY IS.
| 1861. James Hardin vs.. John 0ttline.
1888. Basil ID. Brown vs.. James A. Smitf
ct al
1884. South Bend Chill Piow Co. VI. J
c. Durborrow 4 Co.
1850. Mary Frantz ". Frederick Vert.
1880. J. c. and NJ. Pringle vs.. ohit
Southern r II. Co.
1921. VIM. W. Smith vs.. A. ii. Smith.
! FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 10.
7sS6 Lorenzo ID. Eaton vs.. James Nor
ton.
1892. James NJ Williams vs. Settie vii
liams-
7s7s J. W. Serviss vs.. C. II. Blocher.
1874. james c. Mcmillan vs. ID. o. Heis
keIl ct al
7sss. Mary B. Adams vs. John E. Moor
ct al
TUESDAY. FEBRUARY %.
7sgs. Myers & Siders VS.. John Leon ct al
7sq5. HRnika Iron Fence Co. vs.. Charlie
A. Wood
1895. VIM. Underwood vs.. james Nortoi
et al
7s9s- South Charleston and Washingtor
Turnpike Co. vs. Alfred Brown.
1901. A. q. Smith vs.. r. NJ. Kenney.
TpO2. Edward NJ. SkiIlman vs- Samuel II
Grove.
WEDNESDAY, FEB. ~.
1908. Carrie T. Myers vs.. Edward Myer
e, al.
1918 Harrison woodmansee vs.. W. c
Leffel ct al.
1919. John Penman ct al. vs.. A. C. Jen
nings.
7ess. Isabella Copenhaffer vs. Reubei
Copenhaffer.
1921. Lewis T. ClaSon W. Mac Elrick.
1924 Philip Nihart vs.. Thomas SwangeT
THURSDAY, FER IS.
1854. +. z. Willis & Son vs.. Jane
johnson. ST.
7a4I. Joseph Hinkle vs.. l. B. & W. Ry
Company.
Te42. VIM. 7. Harris vs.. Blskeney Foun
dry Co.
7p45. Sandwich Mfg. Co vs.. C. W. Bane
ct al.
1881. Honora Wood, ex'x., etc, VS.. An
drew Whitley.
FRIDAY, FEB. %.
TSOs. warier & Barnett ct al. vs.. City o
Springfield ct al
1923. Howard Myers vs. Harry NJ. Ran
kin ct al.
1885. John o. Sheets vs.. Margaret Low
man.
1910. Eleanor BOreland vs.. John NJ. Fin
Dey ct al.
1861. John A. Marguart vs.. John c
Byers.
s03s. Caroline Bakhaus ct al. vs.. Cont
mental Life IHs. Co.
The hastsrdy suit Of Cassie Kitzleman rs
Ed. Buck, which was assigned for today
has been postponed by consent
The suit of the Seymour shoe eompan
vs. Margaret Leitschuh WIS dismissed a
plaintiffs cost fer want Of prosecution.
Add Six, and Substitute aTeamster' 20
| sTeacher.H
To the Editor Of the Globe Republic.
In the article in Mondays paper, entitle
An Interesting Pioneer" two misstatt
ments occur: William Huntington wi
soon be eighty-six years of age, instead Q