The Portland daily press. [volume] (Portland, Me.) 1862-1921, 1886-07-22
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT.

LAW TERM-WESTERN DISTRICT.
WEDNEsDAY.-The following cases were dis
posed of:
OXFORD COUNTY.
Philena N Eastman administrative VS. Ambrose
A Eastman. Exceptions overruled.
Swasey for plaintiff. Randall for defendant.
Lucy I; Marble, Administrative, vs. Lamorl G..
Randall for plaintiff Swasey for defendant.
Roscoe G. Heard VS.. Amos Blazo. Argued oral
Redon and Swasey for plaintiH.
Hastings & Son for defendant.
Ebenezer l. Nutter ct ais VS.. Stephen Taylor ct
ais. In writing 30, 10 and 10 or exceptions over
ruled
Hammons for plaintiffs.
Swasey and Bsbee & Hersey for defendants.
Geo. Fl. Bennett VS.. Roxanna Bennett. Sub
mitted on briefs.
Gibson & Swasey for plaintiff.
Herrick & Frye for defendants.
Samuel F. Gibson VS.. Roxanna Bennett Sub
mitted on briefs.
Gibson for plaintiff.
Herrick, Frye Hastings for defendant
Albion S. Burgess vs. Denson Paper Manufac-
turing Company. In writing 80, 80 and 10 or mo-
ton and excerpts overruled.
Randall for plaintiff Swasey for defendant.
Albert D. White vs.. Gilman L. Blake ct ais.
Defendants submits brief. Plaintiff to submit
briefin 80 days or decided without.
Bisbee & Hersey for plaintiff.
Frye & Herrick for defendant.
Ida N. Knight, complainant, VS.. John Thomas.
Frye for plaintiff. Randalls for defendants
Alfred Cole VS.. William c. Hayes. Submitted
on briefs.
Bisbee g. Hersey for plaintiff.
j B. Peaks & j. s. Wright for defendant dlt
&c. 80 and 10 or exceptions overruled
Swasey for plaintiff
Randall, Bisbee & Jersey for defendant.
State, by indictment VS.. Winfield S. Buchanan
Argued orally
Wright, County Attorney, for the State.
Hastings 8 swasey for respondent;
ceptions overruled. Judgment for the State
Wright, County Attorney, for the State.
Hastings & SwaSey for respondent.
Daniel G. Smith VS.. Charles HI. Smith. 8 Motion
overruled for want of prosecution.
b. G. Hall for plaintiff.
+. b. Andrews and j. P. Swasey for diff
ANDDosCoGGIN COUNTY.
Howard W. Carnage in co., VS.. Susie A. Harris
and ais. Savage and Cakes for pltff Record
aud Frye, Cotton & White for defts. In writing
5000 and 10.
j. b. Horn VS.. G. p. Stevens and TT. and Clint
Submitted on briefs.
Savage & Cakes for plttf:
Paschas NJ Morgan Us. G. p Stevens and Tr.
and Clint. Submitted on briefs.
A. s. Twtchell for PITT 4 II uevwooa for c,,mt
Charles E. Gerrish and al. vs. G. T. Stevens and
Tr and Clint. Submitted on briefs.
~ ~ o"n' W. W. Il. Haywood for Cl'mt.
Lewiston Steam Mil Co. vs. Isaac Bowman and
al. In writing, 3o-1o and 10, or motion and ex-
ceptionS Overruled.
Savage & Cakes for pltff.
J.P: Swasey and Frye, Cotton White for dts
Lewiston Steam Mill Company VS.. Isaac Bow
man and al. In writing, 80 and 10.
Savage & Cakes for pltff.
j. P. Swasey and Frye, Cotton 4 White for dts.
Charles Lecros VS.. Stanilas Mucous. Motion
oyerruled.
Savage & Cakes for pltff.
Wing & Wing for deft
Francis X. Belleau VS.. Martin Laffey. Excep-
tions overruled.
Newell & Judkins for pltff.
Frye, Cotton s. White for diff.
Thomas r: Garland, Exr, VS.. Frank L. Hoyt
Argued orally.
+. M. Drewfor pltff. Wing & Wing for diff.
Androscoggin Co. Savings Bank in equity, VS..
VIM. A. Mckinney. Plaintiffs submit brief;
defendant to submit brief in 80 days. Reply in 10
days or decided without.
4 Frye, Cotton & White for pltffs.
Savage & Cakes for diff.
Ellen F. Briggs VS.. Lewiston and Auburn Horse
Railroad Company. To be submitted on briefs
during the term
Savage & Cakes for plttf
Davy g. Estey for diff.
John C. Briggs, aplt. from decree of Judge of
Probate, VS., the Baptist church at East Auburn.
Argued orally.
G. Record for aplt. Wing & Wing for respdt
Josiah G. Bennett and al. VS.. George Holmes
and al. In writing; briefs in.
j. W. Mitchell for pltffs.
David Dunn for dfts