National Republican., 1886-12-07
TIE CouRr RECORD.

united states supreme COurt.-City OF NOW
Orleans VS.. Louisiana Lottery Company; opin-
ion by Justice Matthews; Affirming docreee OF
the court below in favor of the company.
Frcdk. NJ. Kar vs. the state Of Illinois; opin-
ion by Justice Miller, affirming the judgmentof
the court below.
United States vs. Wm. Ranscher case
Of, oxtraditon; opinion by Justice
Miller answering first question In the anlrma-
tive, other two In the negatives Chief Justice
No. 81. Richard Wood ct nl vs.. the city of
Fort Wayne; judgment reversed with costs,
and a new trial awarded. opinion by Mr.
Justice Blatchford.
No 5S, The Clark Pomace-HoldeE, Com.
pany VS.. VIM. II. Ferguson; decree afiirmed
with costs. Opinion by Mr. Justice Batchford.
No. 81. Abbic b. Clark, executrix, &C., ct al.
VS.. George III. Wooster; decree nnirmet with
costs .and interest Opinion by Mr.. Justice
No 23. James Hamilton vs. the vlcksburg,
Shreveport and Pacific Railroad Company;
Judgment affirmed with costs Opinion by Mr..
No So. franklin Colt, administrator &C., vs..
the North Carolina Gold matchmaking Com
pany. Decree affirmed with costs, Opinion
No. 46. Rufus McCreery vs. Ellen Haskell,
successor. &C., ct al. Judgment affirmed with
costs. Opinion by Mr.. Justice Field.
| No. 200. ]. i. ID. Lanicr ct al, &C., va. John
Nash ct al. Motion to dismiss denied. Mo.
| ton TO restrain proceedings on execution post
| poned for notice to the other side to show
| cause.
No. 1l5l, Hamilton ormsby ct al. VS., vii.
| liam b. Webb and G. d. Drake. Motion to
dismiss or affirm denied.
| No. $40. Louis Phillips ct al. VS.. the Mound
City Land and Water Association ct al, Mo-
tion 10 dismiss postponed to hearing on merits.
-. The State OF Wisconsin, plaintitf, vs..
the Pelican Insurance Company. Motion for
| leave TO file declaration granted.
No. II. The Merchants Mutual Insurance
Company, appellant. VS.. George ID. Allen; NO.
rs. The Merchants Mutual Insurance. Com
pany, appellant, VS.. silas Weeks. Motion for
| leave to take further testimony granted.
No. 1904. The United States, plaintiff, vs..
Stephen A. Northway. Motion to advance
| granted and cause assigned for argument on
the first Monday in January af!er No. l2ii.
No. 1914 The Chicago, Burlington and
Quincy Railway Company, plaintiffs in error,
vs. State Of Missouri eX rel Galley, collector
for argument on the first Monday in January
next after cases, already assigned for that day
| No. 1851. Adolphus Eckloh plaintif In CT
ror, VS., the District of Columbia. Motion tt
No iils. David Richmond plaintiff in error
vs. NJ. i. Blake ct al. Motion to advance de
No 1851. John sllney ct al, plaintiff in error
ys. the United States. Motion to advance de
No. 1874. Henry C. Huskamp ct al, plaintiff
in error, w. the Moline Wagon Company. Mo
tion to dismiss submitted,
No. 1924. The United States, appellant vs.
|
to dismiss submitted.
No. 1923. The tinted s,ayes appellant, vs.
f. NJ. symonds; No 1929, the United States
appellant, VS.. Joshua Bishops: No. 1850, tn'
United States, appellant VS.. Charles II. Rock
well; No. l032, the United States, appellant, VS.
Henry r. Philbriek. submitted pursuant L
Goth rule by Mr.. Attorney General Garland ,ant
Mr. f. T.. de Wess for appellants, and by Mr.
Paul Jones and II. b. Lines for appellees.
No 9ie. The California Artificial Stone Paw
ing Company, appellant, VS.. 7. w, schalicke
l INlN VtNTC unf N
NJ. A. Wheaton for appellant and Mr.. Manue
No. 70. ", Ii. Mace, plaintiff in error, VS.. Ell
Mr.. A. B, Browne, Mr.. Walter II. Smith, 70
plaintiff in error, and by Mr.. Il. d. Merrill 70
No. II. The Merchants Mutual Insuranc
Company appellant, vs. George d. Allen; Nc
rs, The Merchants Mutual Insurance Company
appellant VS., silas Weeks. Passed. ,,, =,
No 70 GospEn T,Bn Burrei e, Sl Sv PH!ntw' PI
Upton for plaintiffs in error and by Mr.. samue
shellabarger for defendant In error
No. so. Edmund l.. Cope ct al, appellants
vs.. the yallette Dry. Dock Company Argue,
by Mr.. J. r. Beckwith for appellants and sui
mitted by Mr.. Alfred Goldthwaite for appellee
No; s2 L. G. YhitIord, plaintiff in error, VI
by Mr.. Clinton Rowell for plaintiff In error au
continued by Mr.. NJ. G. Reynolds for deiendau
in error.
Court in General Teim-Chef Justice Car
ter and Justices Cox and Merrick.-Unite
States cx rel. Jerome 4. Manning vs. Secretary
ofState Bayard, on application for subpnen
duCes tecum; argued and motion denied. Al
deTson VS.. Tenney; argued and submitted
Nlrmaduke VS., steamer George Leary; motto
of libelant TO dismiss appeal allowed, Assigl
ment for to day-Nos. Is, 80, 80, 81, SO, 67, o
G2, 20, 72
, Circuit Court-Justice Hagner. District
Columbia VS.. Johnson Bros; leave granted |
amend declaration Tolson VS.. Inland au
sehboard Coasting Company on trial. Assg
| ment for to- day unchanged.
Equity Court-Justlce James-Richardso
, VS.. Tullock ct al; pro coniesso against certai
defendants. Clements vs. Combs; reference
the auditor. Ford VS.. Mankin; sale to Joh
Burke ratified nisl and reference to auditor, an
Eiblack Il al. make parties defendants. stan
ford VS.. Yeabower; order making q. ]. Gockel
I party complainant. Sullivan vs.. Sullivan; te
; timony ordered taken before Examiner J. !
Clarke: Lemon vs.. Fit2geraldi on hearing A
iourned sine die.