The weekly Floridian. [volume] (Tallahassee, Fla.) 1867-19??, 1886-04-15


-NGTnNH lRxKH ssusns kfTA s1n
!. 8. ~ sss sSssl 30 Ss'ss
& 81 - -
- of chIiau : = - -. -
60 ri ~ 1Szu7 a a.
&@A NS161l = Sf1s1 ~ - .<<66sss
ssAsuie dscl1sle1 lkst - sl2sSs Ss7 SsrsS ~
/ laWs n cnn7ies vf9K 5kise; - ~ s iIS
ous lava IA. 80. s.;
| Pnempsory writ VII g granted
| W, B L4alas, r. b Hils6n. for HeiaSon al.
~ asb ~ 0sliondsaL sS
u - s...... - = -..~...Sx, =
=. =. - 1911 k1ossus y =.
.o- A9Rssss = psatI non 0eaa9e county.
McWH0RrxR, g. T.: 81
| Il Ia 4 suif f,r damsee ra.nltIn~ frnvus savsss
Wild fBrss1s q woods Il ths njalneIlf "A esek
suit havs notice a - lafsntioa ~ lke defend.
ant ID iIres the sA,ne fSe11l11a q Chan Sflf.
Laws OF FiondAl 8 20 1870 enneir2
20 far as such plantiH = cooorned = b whc4her
other persons living witkia faIIS n ia pleoe
intended to be flred wcre i,DfjGs1 q euch inJsa.
ton or nos s
Evidence Of the = r6p,efu5foa ~ q xv;fnAne =
ssrpsa< Of As opsspsxs.h 3 ioeda daiisslbis
8 A party to suit Will not be allowed to In
troduce evidences of The rexutnffun fr trxIlh nd
veracity Of one og his own vilaeesea. vhsrs fhe
character Of such wifneus ~ ~ koeu af1nr2ed
ID any way III hia afi1slr1f1I
amined In court supplies no ground sor admit-
ting evidence of The general charncfer cf either
OF them.
g. Sec 1, Chap 3f4l, regulating the time and
manner OF firing wild forests and woods, has no
application to firing which 4 uuintentional
Judg ment reversed and new trial granted
Scott q Thrasher, for Appellant; 8. n. Spark
man, for Appellee
Meinhardt Bros. & Co, Appellants, va Solomon
Mode, Appsllee-Appeal from Nassau county.
RANry T..
&c ~
a.. a. ~ klapnea n, VINO was aeting ana
C =. d.s WIN - sne lepresentasive OF A. -.
ndemena n Ja favo, ,nfu r parry ios the amonn, o.
debtor. T. nj. and A. ~ wbich r jrsf ,si.'
ersphed s. M in the name NJ y n p a =. -
]. B. H"H binding that The renr.sae,ss;vsi G poI ~
the judgment would not accept such drnlt be-
cause there was no bank in the place OF the res
ldence OF the person upon whom II was to be
urswn tnfough which II could be collected, set
.Isu the Jadgment oy drait on his principals,
VINO nonored u, and then drew In favor Of his
Principals Tor the same amount on such third
party, ana she refused payment: Held, (a) That
the purpose of B. NJ, as indicated by the tele-
gram was tnat the Judgment should be paid, and
.ueie was notning IN the c0urse pursued under
II that exceeded substantially the request or au-
.nor,iy conveyed or which relieved 8. u. nom
W Anet " AA~ ltnotifty sO A -. q
Co. was that OF principal debtor, and not Of .
guaransor.
=. mere tne question Is ~ TO the authority
gwen oy telegram, the party to 1t sued, should
the authority Conferred is concerned il n he H.
rived from the telegram and the en,ire co,tr.ct
between the parties
Q. WneIe kilograms DO not contain the entire
eouI a.', .ne o.ner paris OF II may De proved by
ve!oaI tesumony, or Dy other writings, or by
po.n as In o'heI cases where the entire contract
has not oeen reduced 70 writing.
Suugment reversed ana new trial granted.
Can q Jones, u +. J. o. Cooper, for Appel
iants; d. j. BAKER, Tor Appellee.
Hy Robinson, ct el., the County Commissioners
of Duval county, Appellants, va. Albert Fries.
Appeilee-Appeal from Duval county.
McWHoRrER. G. T..
Fr;., oht.;,aa
oga;nst ,he Torn,J s n..1 ~ ms yasucs S9uIt
aSa.nJ. aan1a sne couny on DuvaL Inc DEFENDANT
,ta onaa, - INC S.Ica Ocul., wnicn dismissed
wss az dafar.,na 'Is =; seouso snas 'ne
;rdc,,s.r." T ~ so.M - nos 70 consssuse
oh,e;ned an si,ess,;'a a.us sppilo1 TOT ana
ran.ad =. "I .h ",eS'nase W Wiz " manusmus Oh
co,,u., )" sue UUun1y Oommissionefs OF sald
,h".1 ss'1a uGnnlaIang mem 70 snow cause why
IT,, y,h;. 80. III ~ s - ~ pay saao yuusmens.
the matter IN con,rovsrux s. maae ma aesarn tnas
setting forth The ;ude1.s,. - - a. .s;, sna
shoves mo.ad 10TH tne laugmen. o. the circuit Court