The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1886-05-21
COURT PROCEEDINGS.

The case of John &. Rouse VS.. Henry and
Frances II. Fulfo I'd was concluded last Friday,
without argument, the jury, under instructions
from the court, bringing in verdict for the
plaintiff for SsO3.6S. VanBibber and VIM
Young for plaintiff, II. W. Archer, H. w.
Archer, Jr., and A. NJ. Fulford for defendants.
The appeal docket was called on Saturday.
The following entries were made:
David and Mary c. Deckman VS.. Miller a.
Weaver; stet. Stump for appellants, VIM.
Young for appellees.
Thos. c. Flaharty VS.. David l.. Day; judgment
reversed and Judgment in favor of appellee for
S5.05 and costs.
John II. Haines vs.. Harrison Hopper; agreed.
Archer d VanBibber and VIM. Young for APP
pellant, II. w. Archer and Marine for appellee.
s. c. Famous VS.. w. P. &. Whitaker, trustee;
attachment jury trial writ quashed and judg
ment reversed, costs in favor of appellant. VIM.
Young for appellant, Hopper, Williams and
| Robinson for appellee.
VIM. A. McComas VS.. Susan Henry; agreed
Lee for appellant Williams for appellee.
Jas. Smith VS.. Samuel l.. Griffith stet-
Hopkins for appellant, Archer Il VanBibber for
s. c. Famous VS.. W. P. G. Whitaker; Jury
trial; judgment reversed and judgment in
favor of appellant for cost. VIM. Young for
appellant, Williams, Hopkins and Robinson
for appellee.
w. p. G. Whitaker, trustee, vs. Steward
| Famous; referred by agreement to VIM Young
and p. Leslie Hopper. Robinson, Hopkins and
Williams for appellant, VIM. Young for appel
| lee.
James Smith vs. Dominick Hammond; stet.-
John S. Young and Hopkins for appellant, VIM.
| Young for appellee
D. K. Burreil VS.. Joseph Michigan agreed
II. W. Archer and Cooley for appellant, VIM.
| Young for appellee.
| prin Tanb nd
terms filed. VIM. Young for appellant, Archer
& VanBibber for appellee.
| On Monday the case of Smalwood VS.. Will
liams, was tried. 1t was an appeal from the judy
ment of Justice Richardson for 800, in favor of
| Williams, for the loss of horse belonging to
Williams, while being driven by Smalwood-
The jury rendered verdict of S95 in favor of
| Williams. Maynadicr and VanBibber for ap-
pellant Hopkins and VIM. Young for appellee.
On Tuesday the appeal case of DR.. Mordecai
| Price VS.. Frank Bateman was tried before Judge
Waters. Judgment reversed and judgment in
| favor of DR.. Price for &C. 10. VIM. Young for
appellant Maynadier for appellee
| Uriah johnson vs. e. G. Hanway 81 Bro !;
tried before the court judgment revered and
judgment in favor of appellee for 81 cents, each
party to pay his own costs. Harlan forappelant
| Williams for appellee.
| The case of Nicholas Greenland VS.. the Coun-
| ty Commissioners, being an appeal from an
| order of the Commissioners for opening public
| road through the lands of the appellant, in
| MarshalPs district was commenced on Friday.
Messrs. Stump and Harlan appeared for the
appellant. The Commissioners were represent
ed by their attorney, Mr.. VIM. Young, and
Messrs. H. W. Archer and Williams.
| Counsel for Mr.. Greenland filed motion to
quash the proceedings, on the ground that
the commission did moi specify the duties for
which the examiners were appointed, and that
the examiners in their report failed to give the
reasons upon which their opinion and determi-
nation were founded, as required by law.
motion to dismiss the appeal was also made
| by Mr.. Young, for the Commissioners, for the
reason that the law requires copies of the papers
to be sent up to court, whereas, the originals
were sent. This motion was overrued by the
| court
The motion to quash was then argued 1t
was also overruled. Twenty or thirty witnesses
were summoned in the case