Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1886-02-04

|as !, ! y, / Bill Passed for
!, ', S,Ssnl d Texas

n IL. . regard 70 SILVER
& ,sopi.d ~ House
~ ~ .u'sr H'r'"s'''
,riS congress-
ms s SsSA'Ss, .- The chair
poS .i nss the resolution
Is.ier'ilsiso XIII 4 submitted by Mr..
slai' iI q : the relations
hars PRESIDENT and the
# BE 10 Information
a sn,S the suspension or APP
y ro 2 said that practically but
ruHass ~, ~ session were left ior
rnaOlutlO0 OANAN
n lhe ., lssJ question but only
lIas'1 and he thoughtit would
'ilV0 y Ia debate the question
o ~ ss Z a practical cues
x sll l',S vote Tote to lay the resolu-
!. l lasoss,sr addressed the chair.
'g sald the question was not
MI g, n unanimous consent
t ~ = was allowed to pro-
y, sot object to the first three
w ", II lngh's resolution. When
81 y Y, rsr II sections he diff
n. " q, Pug Pugh. His (Riddleber-
,s N, merely involved two
's''r namely, that we had no
io,,Ire from the president
/. .'y s+moyaI or suspensions Oh
Md ne right TO demand any
Y IN asners or proofs as to the
!, isopointment. The rest OF
Commitment as to public
IA. 1Mu r Riddleberger saw no
.nlrited debate the motion 10
n ,,nle was agreed to, only one
'sssrl in the negative.
|ilsberger then rose and again
: X, resolution that a few min
X I'D been laid on the table. he
..s ~, from Kansas (lngallsl
<s'sv given notice that he would
XXI that resolution to a COM
NJ moved that 1t be taken from
4 mrmit Of that disposition.
a sss agreed to without debate
.olutiou was again placed be-
After a pause, no motion
!. he chair inquired of Riddle
n notion was to refer the res
\ committee.
iIeOerger said he had nothing
M motion to refer. He had
N resolution so the senator
X Mr.. Ingalls, could move
d Ms notice. Mr.. Riddleber-
"a The course of the senator,
E,lee was too oppressed
heard except by him.
% first makes a speech
noyes an unbeatable motion.
tgnd being run over by Il rail
} continued Mr.. Riddlebergeri
N care about being mashed by
4arog. Great laughter.
Iton d Mr., Morrill, the resolu-
tAen, without debate, referred &c
b iltee on privileges and elections
IS passed for the benefit OF tho
Texas. Colorado, Oregon, Ne
|aIIiornla, Kansas and Nevada
krntorIeS of Washington anC
provides that in case of the loss
giaal vouchers required by law
settlement of claims by
n and territories named
llry Of war may accept copie:
irpctly certified by the state o.
y eiheers.
Sock the Dakota bill was PLACED
senste aud Mr., Logan took thu
offered materially, he said
he senator from Soul
\ lButlef) and the sen
\ from Missouri (Vest)
# 70 The question under considera
h aresn states had been admitted
e force Of enabling acts ant
aies without enabling acts
ihefeiore, was free to adop
clIse according to the circum
shlsh Ia each case might seen
IA to the public good What wa
Anllal objection TO Dakota's ad
6s reading a paragraph from
leFs speech we might get
= lesst Of a shadow of the rea
ihemeanlng of the objection
ADakola wereadmitted 1t woul,
electoral votes to the Republi
aga At the next presidential
le Inquired of Mr.. Butte
nal was not the point.
Ealler denied it and said h
'ads declared that eve
political complexion {
wye Democratic he woul
obliged TO oppose its admlssio
PRESENT aspect Of the applics
" sald that when the Republ
w anlthins the idea of the ser
Nuln Carolina was that 1t wa
gaclique.
sAA's idea was that without r,
le politics Of Il teri
aoolu be admitted whe
y necessary populatio
!, sondltions, and Mr.. Loga
2 y obliged, in the absence {
y feler to some OF that sen,
'alA lie (Logan) wanted /
great harm was done in I'll
Y lhe United States ii a ma
- Y Gsntion the fact that @,
@sss inhabited Dakota, Son
mary Inference had bee
ron "A referenC
Harrison TO .,
\. s y 10 connection with til
ID y Dakota, Mr.. Logan said h.
WIZ more in sorrow than
Y could not iorbear sayin
NY north Of the linen thu
sss lcnnd Or Injustice iucu
W. north Of the line this
= ~ Y 2 deprive the people
=, Aae objections to Dakot