The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1886-11-15

default 10 be imprisoned.
Rex ". Jackson Correa, cruelty to
animal Appeal from Police Court,
Hilo. The appeal was withdrawn and
fine paid.
Rex vs.. Francisco de Souza, fast riding.
Appeal from Police Court, Hilo. Con-
tinued to Mag term, defendant being
bound over on his own recOgnizance.
w. Kinney for defendant.
Rex Us. 2. A. Diaz, selling liquor with
out license Appeal from District
Court, North Kohala. This case was
bitterly fought and lasted two days. The
Jury brought in a unanimous verdict Of
guilty, and the defendant was fined $3.50
and costs. ". A. Kinney and l.. \.
Thurston for defendant.
Rex ". An Nee and All San (ChJ. re-
ceiving stolen goods. Appeal from Dis
trict Court. South Kohala. Appeal with
drawn and fine paid.
Rex vs.. Ali (Ch), recovering stolen
goods Committed from District Court,
South Kohala. Deposit forfeited for
non-appearance.
Rex vs.. Ten Hook (ChJ, burglary
Continued from May term. Nole pros.
entered.
CIVIL CAsEs-FOREIGN JURY.
VIM. Matson vs.. I. X. Gaspar, as
sumpsit Withdrawn.
Hamilton Johnson vs.. Joe Felores, as
sumpsit Appeal from Judge Lyman,
Hilo. Motion to dismiss on informality.
Appeal dismissed. d. II. Hitchcock for
plaintiff, Kinney & Thurston for de-
PENDANT.
Joe Flores VS.. VIM. Shipman, suit to
recover a COW. Appeal from Judge Ly-
man, Circuit Judge, Hilo Appeal
Withdrawn.
CIVIL CASEs-HAwAHAN JURY.
Aukai (k) and Ida (w) VS.. d. B. Wa
hine *, right OF way. Appeal from the
decision OF the Road Commissioners,
Hilo. Sent back to Commissioners of
Private Ways and Water Rights. d.
H. Hitchcock for plaintiff; Kinney and
Thurston for defendant.
Kiha VS.. Tim Kaai, assumpsit. Con-
tinued from the May term, Hilo. Again
continued to May term, 1887.
\. w. Haalilio vs.. Pupue, deserving
contract service. Appeal from Judge
Lyman, North Kohale. Appeal with
drawn.
Kalaniumi ct al VS.. MakahOloi ct al,
ejectment Case discontinued by plant
ifs, d. H. Hitchcock appearing for
them; Antoine Rosa for defendants.
CIVIL CAsEs-mxED JURY.
All Chung (Ch) VS.. Il. Kalae, trespass.
Discontinued.
\. G. Senaro VS.. c. w Moanaule,
assumpsit Appeal from Police Court,
Hilo. Withdrawn.
All Ho (Ch) VS.. Kipi, assumpsit. APP
peal from Judge Lyman, North Kohala.
Continued to May term, 1887.
Kalua vs.. Halawa Sugar Company,
suit for damages laid at 5000, to taro
patch from bad water from plantation.
Withdrawn.
Keawe VS.. Halawa Sugar Company,
suit for damages for 5000 to taro land,
by refuse water from mill. Verdict for
plaintiff for 5000 Exceptions noted and
perfected. Kinney and Hitchcock for
plaintiff; Thurston for defendant.
r. X. Hind VS. JAS Bright, replevin
for horse. Jury waived. Appeal
from Circuit Judge Lyman. Judgment
for defendant Kinney and Thurston
for plaintiff; Hitchcock for defendant.
Divorces were granted in the following
cases: Keanu (w) VS.. Hanakahi (k),
Manamana (w) VS.. Kiamiau (k), Mary
X. KAPPA (w) vs. Benz. KAPPA (k), Mele
Naeolu (w) VS.. Maikaimohi Naeola,
custody OF children granted to plaintiff
and order for alimOny reserved until
May term. The case of Mary G. Robin
son vs.. q. Robinson was dismissed,
while the two following were continued
to the May term, 1897: Maria Lama
lima VS. Manuel Lamalima, Stachlouff
vs.. Stachlouff.