The Sedalia weekly bazoo. [volume] (Sedalia, Mo.) 187?-1904, 1886-01-12

: default and final against others for
sl36 and s per cent.
Same vs.. w. o. Means. ct al, note;
dismissed as to defendant Boyd and
judgment by default and final for
plaintiff VS.. Means for 1856 and per
cent.
Aultman,, Miller & Co. Va. Samuel
b. Scott, notes judgment by default
and final for plaintiff as follows: First
count $40, second count 1886, total
s2l6 and 10 per cent. y
BufOrd q George Implement COM
paBy VS.. Zach Reynolds. note; judg-
ment by default and final for plain
tiff for S101 and s per cert.
/ Wayne Agricultural Co. VS.. Otto
Mass, notes judgment by default and
final for plaintiff as follows: First
count S130.25, second count S134. IS,
third count, s2O4.79 with six per
cent, on first aud eight per cent. on
second and third counts. Total
s469.69.
Homer Lsughlin vs.. George T.
Brown, note; judgment by default
and final for plaintiff for s1S9 and 10
per cent.
4. Colburn Il Co. vs. G. G.. Stan
ley. ct al, appellants appeal plain
till files motion to affirm judgment of
justice of the peace.
VIM. Hahn vs. s. B. Sturtevsnt;
defendant files demurrer to petition.
Home Insurance Co. vs. Thomas
Moore, ct al. bond; defendant Moore
has leave to answer twenty days after
term.
Ed Harrington vs. the City of Sc
dalis, damages, defendant files an
swer.
Mary E. Harrington and Ed Har.
rlngton vs the City Of Sedalia, dam
ages, defendant files answer.
These suits grow out of injuries al
legged to have been sustained by the
defendant, Mary E. Harrington, from
a fall produced by the neglect of the
city to keep a certain sidewalk in re-
pair. The city sets up in defense
that it is not liable because of the
fact that it had never ordered any
sidewalk built at the plsce of the &C
cident and was not therefore, respon-
sible for the condition of any sidewalk
which might have been there. The
case is one involving the extent Of the
liability of the city for the condition |
of ifs highways and will be watched
with no little interest by all parties to |
the suit and those effected by its results. |
James NJ. Mcdowell vs. F. Hous-
ton, garnishee of Cord Cruise, plaintiff
files interrogatories Of garnisheer.
State ex rel Fulkerson vs.. z. HI.
Emmerson, change of venue; stipula-
ton fled and cause continued accord |
ingly.
George Corns vs. the Missouri Pa
ci6c Railway company, damages; de-
PENDANT files motion to dismiss suit.
G. NJ. Hoadley vs. Michael Sulli-
van, appeal; dismissed by agreement
at defendants costs.
M. J. Smith VS.. M. S. Conner, re-
plevin; plaintiff files motion for judg-
ment on pleadings.
z. J. Smith vs.. r. Ritter, account
at plaintiffs costs.
James Nj. johnson vs. r. w. Bar
nett ct al. appeal; plaintiff files mo-
tion to vacate order staying execution.
P. b. Rife files return to rule to show
cause why it should not be granted.
State ex rel Priest VS. III. G.. Smith
ct ell, taxes. III. G. Smith, ap-
pointed guardian ad Item for
infant, defendants, David e.
Sweet and Harry G. Smith, and
file demurrer to petition.
Same VS. III. G. Smith. I'll.
c. Smith, appointed guardian
ad Item, for infant, defendants, Ber-
tie Smith and Harry Smith, and de-
PENDANTS file demurrer to petition.
Waddy Thompson vs. Mary Dem