Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1886-05-07
SUPREME COURT.
DEPARTMENT TWO

cause 10 be sslereupOn submitted.
Il ,A5-Biyen vs.. Bostwick-On motion of
Dudley, ordered respondent be alloTed 80 days
TO file brief, appellant 10 days TO reply, cause
be thereapon submitted.
1,2lf-Estate OF Stewart-Cause ordered re-
ferred to Commissioners for oral argument at a
date to be fixed hereafter. Further ordered that
W. l.. Dudley, counsel for executors, be allowed
10 days 10 file brief.
ll,2l6-Austin VS.. Andrews-On motion of
Woods, ordered appellant be allowed 10 days TO
file brief, respondent 10 days to reply appellant
10 days to reply thereto, cause to he thereupon
submitted.
ll,223-Harris VS.. HARRISON motion of Holl,
ordered respondent be allowed % days TO file
brief, appellant 10 days to reply cause 10 be
thereupon submitted.
Il ,24-Estate of Kile-Ordered referred to
commissioners for oral argument at date TO be
fixed hereafter
II ,33S-Wallace ct al. vs. All Sam ct al.-On
motion OF Campbell, ordered that respondents
have 30 days to file brief, appellants 20 days to
reply. cause 10 be thereupon submitted.
H,365-Weaver ct al. VS.. Farchild ct al.-0n
motion of Terry for respondents there being no
appearance or points and authorities. it is or
dered that the Judgment and order herein be
and the same IS hereby reafiirmed.
1,393-OullahAn VS.. Mlrrissey-Ordered APP
pelant be allowed % days TO file brief respond
ent ~ days to reply, cause to be thereupon sub
mitted
II, 42s-Bernard VS.. Beecher-On motion of
Woods, ordered respondent be allowed % days
TO ME brief appellant 10 days to reply, cause to
be thereupon submitted.
ordered appellant be allowed % days to file
2rlei, respondent 20 days to reply, cause to be
thereupon submitted.
u,iS2-Hogan VS.. c. P r. r. Com motion
of Campbell, ordered appellant be allowed %
days to file brief, respondent % days to reply,
appellant 10 days to reply thereto cause to be
thereupon submitted
u,io3-Shepperd VS.. Jones-On motion of
Campbell, ordered respondent be allowed 20
days TO file brief appellant 10 days to reply
thereto cause to be thereupon submitted
I f4J-HADth IN OrIa
above
II ,5l4-Watkins VS.. Lynch-On motion of Hall,
ordered respondent be allowed y days to file
brief appellant 10 days to reply, cause to be
thereupon submitted.
u.5l7-Watrous VS.. Cunningbam-On motion
OF Woods, ordered appellant be allowed 20 days
to file brief respondent 10 days to reply, appel
liant ~ days to reply thereto cause thereupon TO
be submitted.
Il ,547--Kearney ct al. vs. Kearney-Argued by
Elliott for appellants. Ordered respondents be
allowed 20 days to file brief appellant 20 days to
reply, cause to be thercupon submitted.
II ,139-Ely VS.. ioTe-on motion of Belcher.
ordered that respondent be allowed so DAYS TO
file brief appellant 20 days to reply Thereto,
cause TO be thereupon submitted.
11,543-Weayerman VS.. kelly-On motion of
Craddock: ordered cause be submitted upon
briefs on file
n,19o-Yolo County VS. Knights-On motion
OF Harding, ordered appellant be allowed 20
days to file brief, respondent 10 days to reply
cause thereupon to be submitted.
II .2i3-Kripp VS.. Curtis ct al-On motion of
johnson. ordered respondent be allowed . DAYS
to file BRIEF appellant 10 days to reply cause to
be thereupon submitted.
II, 253-People and Rec. Dist. l0S vs. Hubert
ct a. On motion of Adams, ordered respondent
be allowed 80 days to file brief, appellant 10
days to reply, cause to be thereupOn submitted
n.2s9-Harnish ct al. VS.. Beamer ct al-On
motion of Sprague, and suggestions of diminu-
ton of record, ordered appellant be allowed to
file certified copy, showing date Judgment was
entered. Further ordered respondent be allowed
80 days to file brisf, appellant 20 days to replv
cause to be thereupon submitted.
II 5l$1Hambleton VS. Duhain ct al-On mo-
ton OF Craddock, ordered respondent be al
lowed % Gays to file brief, appellant % DAYS TO
reply. cause to be thereupon submitted.
1IoH-Hlliker VS.. kuhn-On motion of
SDraEue, and suggestion of diminution of rec
ord, ordered appellant be allowed to file certi-
fed copy of date of entry of Judgment without
prejudice to respondents motion to dismiss
Further ordered appellant be allowed 20 DAYS to
file brief, respondent 20 days to reply. anpel-
liant 10 days to reply thereto cause to be there
upon submitted
1l,5Sl-Glasscock VS.. c. p r. r. Co.-On mo-
ton OF benson, ordered appellant be allowed 30
days to file brief, respondent so days to reply,
appellant 10 days TO reply thereto, cause to be
thereupon submitted.
to stipulatiOns fled herein, cause ordered sinh
mitted upon briefs on file
n,}Od-Quinn VS. Anderson ct al.-Ordered re-
spondent be allowed until May 30 1856 TO file
bret, cause to be thereupon submitted
II, 4l6-Weidekine vs.. Tuolumnc County
n5teI Norks-fuIsuant 70 stlpulationS on file
ordered respondent by allowed - DAYS to file
brief cause to be thereupOn submitted
II, lU9-Ilpton ct al. vs. Morton ct al-Pursl-
ant 10 stlP'llatlons Med herein, ordered appel
lGnt DC allowed 20 days to file brief respondent
~ days to reply, appellant 10 days To reply
thereto, the cause thereupon to be submitted
II, 259-Tait VS.. Hall-Pursuant to stiuulgtions
on ME herein, ordered appellant by allowed p
daAs 10 file brief, respondent 20 days to reply.
appellant 10 days to reply thereto. the cause
thereupon to be submitted. without prejudice to
a substitution of attorney for appellant
S,293-LangdOn VS.. Stockton s. and L. Society,"
ON motion of Turner, and being no appearance
or points nnd authorities on file for appellant, it
Is ordered that the judgment and order herein
be and the same is hereby affirmed
S,S30-Cahen ct al. VS. Mahoney-On motion of
Garter ordered appellant be allowed % days to
ME brief, respondent 20 days to reply, appellant
~ Gays 10 reply thereto cause to be thereupon
submitted
1I.o5S-Lodtman ct oil. VS.. schluter ct al.-on
motion OF Dudley. aud suggestion of diminution
OF record, ordered appellant be allowed TO file
certificate of Clerks as TO certain afidayits
Further ordered appellant be allowed 10 days to
lie brief, respondent 20 days to reply appellant
10 days to reply thereto, cause thereupon to be
1l,252-Ames VS.. Hightower-Argued nv Tur-
ner for appellant. Ordered respondent be ali.
lowed 20 days to file brief cause to be thereupon
submitted.
11,Sl7-Brouehton VS. Vasquez-On motion of
stonesifer, and suggestion of diminution of rec
ord counsel for respondent agrees to stipulate
as suggested by counsel. Further ordered re-
spondent be allowed so days to file brief. appel
liant 10 days to reply, cause to be thereupon sub
mitted.
II. 405-Taylor vs. Terry-On motion of Stone
siier, ordered respondent be allowed until MAY
70 1856 to fle brief; appellant Is days to reply;
cause TO be thereupon submitted.
II, 037-McKenzie vs. Brandon ct al-Op mo
ton of Irwin. ordered appellant be allowed %
days to file brief, respondent 20 days TO reply,
upon to be submitted.
l1:27s-Schenck VS.. Hartford Life ms Coon
motion of Van Ness, ordered appellant be al
lowed 10 days to file brief respondent 20 DAYS tn
reply, appellant 10 days to reply thereto, cause
to be thereupon submitted
II ,057-Lamb VS.. Rec. Dist No. 10S.-On mo-
ton OF Ball ordered respondent be allowed 80
days to file brief appellant 20 days to reply.
cause to be thereupon submitted.
II, 162-Packer VS.. Bird ct al.-On motion of
Beleher, ordered appellant be allowed 10 days
to file brief, respondent 20 days to reply cause
thereupon to be submitted.
Ti,l75-Bank of Chico VS.. Spect ct al-On mo-
ton Of Harrington, ordered cause to be sub
mitted upon briefs on file.
II ,2l1-C. 2. K. r. Co. VS. Creed-On motion of
Harrington, ordered appellant be allowed 20
days to tile brief, cause 10 be thereupon sub
ll,2H-Wills vs.. kong-On motion of Deuel..
ordered appellant be sallowed 80 days to file
brief, cause thereupon TO be submitted.
l,2s2-Roche VS. Ware ct al.-On motion of
Bayne, ordered cause be submitted upon briefs
on file.
II ,5i2-People, etc, vs. Rockhold ct al.-on |
lHotIon OF AudlnS continued IOr the term.
1.OSl-Shumway VS.. Leakey ct al.-On motion /
of Goodwin, ordered appellant be allowed 10 |
days to file brief, respondent % days to reply,
appellant % days to reply thereto: cause to be |
thereupon submitted.
II, ld3-Shumway VS.. Leakey-On motion of |
Goodwin, ordered cause be submitted upon !
briefs ON file.
II .l0s-Myers VS.. Moulton ct al.-on motion |
OF Goodwin, ordered respondent be allowed % |.
days to file brief, appellant 20 days to reply, |
cause thereupon to be submitted.
u.42f-FGzeil VS.. Leakey - On motion of |
Edgerten. ordered appellant be allowed % days |
to file brief respondent 10 days to reply appel /
liant 10 Gays to reply thereto, cause to be there
upon submitted.
ll.5S7-Perkins VS.. Rail ct al-Same order as |
above.
ll-s07-Garabald VS. Shattuck ct aI.-On mo- |
ton OF Reordon, ordered cause to be submitted |
upon briefs on file.
Il .S1s-Lowall VS.. Gridley ct al-same order /
as above.
II .4l7-McEiroy VS. Collins Ct al-on motion |
of Hart, ordered appellant be allowed 50 davs to |
file brief. respondent 80 days TO reply appellant /
10 days to reply thereto cause thereupon to be |
submitted.
li,4ee-Biggs vs. Lloyd ct ai.-Cause ordered
n.5a3-butte County vs.. Boydstein ct al.-On |
motion of ReOrdqn. ordered anrallant no OIL