New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1886-11-23
M'OUADE'S FATE IN DOUbl'
Continued frnm First PnGe.

said .-.,,uout
Mr. Newcomhe then started his closing are'l'eIs
He spoke in clear voice and with mueh eco and
some parts Of his discourse. He has peaS"s s,r
manner He delivered with special emphasis '"o u
Citations of Duffy and Fullgraf He SAID liz ,o,he
The + Of , yis r %cliSncs
aepcndent upon him. to rs wife ana mor Of "a. prrss We
fell n Hs np opinions wes for
defendant n. az cases were the deienn ,Dno
Won have promised under osth not~ il upon
ssb d ae e Does not the de'ensn or nbt as
against ED the testimony the vile "re'ehe' WHO
M made sarcastic references to Mayor bioD Ma a. Moi
and good Sd hs asked n that might reject on Mr.
Newrombe He called Duffy and ad slny Great
| urcs" He continued: ,,,av anal
r me prosecution have their proof 81 S ,s upon
W Of tue defendant s Is rely upon with which 70
convict aeeas They rely gppp po s' ren,smen
u yies%ony Before accept that MAT sSs 9anI pre-
esien you take che . sssepy say
az LAMP am sn
It ont Of the state Prison aud Ivy COZ the purpose Of
sisysr NAV be s S'fsssFy 70 And says sowary beast
Ike ereanrs protect INV family a.
himself up cheeks flushing AND ns
aashing he exclaimed with deliberate a. ., Cor hi.
And he lied and he Ned he have ea no eS ~ Tor him
vic Far 5s n wG %f iar have
better T soT h Il" c he shou be ney
i 1 should be qPs s, i Ss
IN occupied BY p n Sss he lied oath That
s%ssk 10 SrSstc lis WIFE children
MOnS he "' had had one, spark o. said mAH %Y will
ms S nv w re eeS pOGts the ,ss. ens
o. |s around my neck sell az tend dog with the
am mat Is it possible that in this Sai on
twelve gentlemen can BE- gotten 70 ese Sht in their
snrh testimony there no REASONABLE hence subject
thai Of a, ,. ,gd S1y ant the crime
10 As, Neucombe pointed out certain dscreparf ,,,ts
=, & te testimony OF Fullgraf and Ddny aI1 10 the
n az to the 9Ge u the S appcaons the franchises Were
Of made He also referred to the ,aenn escn one both
r mo" the facts ami the character. differ
- explained that couD ,le'' as to the ACCESSIBILITY
a. eff M ting the defendant on the stand a that
U per st to defendant to place him ~ sae ayd Mr.
" witness IN MS Own Win fervent appeal in behalf OF tne
lila wife and children and urged tnsI ~ iif of
by doubt eAl;'o man tbeg could not convict WINE mr
p Neweombe speaking Mcna eas made 10 his family
on niln q; o ihe and embarrassment came over 'D
narily hopeful countenahce' ,r
co,nx,L FtLLow>'s ARGrNKNT'
s oir,tes before o'clock when MI Now
enisned and after delay OF ten minutes Vi "0 =,
N Mr. Fellows began his argument iOi ~ 49,, Iaobus
thaearv mart of his remarks lac teie'iou " W. -,
ck case ayinc that inasmuen as the ooOi' 20 ., oLs
AS No., i,troiuced that feature. be was pil'ieso - -
ar - Mr. Fellows CHANGED to remark 'nl'' '' ~
en told bv Inspector Byrnes was suDs''luail' n,,o,
ler ,hat told by Fuugraf and Duh!' 80.
at ...raI Trarv and asked ia,
az ,,eheia a. the ground that the District @ t;o
we sde an erroneous statement ~ 70 ON both side
he Recorder Instructed the Fry c 20 relative
et whatever had been su oS then roceeded with hi
nee ease of Jaehne;; Mr. feio"'
a. argument salu ne .,.,o, has been gong on
A TUqs epy s has cncn Eysry.sS rS ss Gss
zoe ia before thai has been le 20 - due 10 the ski
me The sncces' o. .s Of the q the teye a Br
ing G city a3d ed sanHS' S NJ Sc me persons
set OF these matters has particularly n % m
in .r.4Vp "A .
re- , C0Pne1 ation to Broadway franchise, aG
Iess tha tIe ge Of the Railroad Bill by the - 49,
hat Sser then for the nrs time the Common fred 10 Ii
I'M Witnesses FuIpaG and Duiy' s"yins g., M, real
pts The on the Safr 1dS the IS great tfi%e
rosry thy told OF s the mor is usually
to g AZ o Joins which ResRS na another
ys. s the Ssi cr BSt R hugs
man Ce MS breast mas 3; s s aaa IS not
1use TO nSse ~ ip In tine path repentance anu
Tor Sc described in sarcastic words the proceedings O
1onc Tney met and offers One was . q 5SO gould
sSae 9o. 1eht ami wisely dr ied 70 h
Of s s 70 and ns a. tn @
mall they TO settle on i@ Estimation which Melon
Ae these ss sG one s soo
h he was opuar and Vt .As %I I But fortunat
an ter Of ssoISS citizen who S"Sya
% and they found hun ssen SH SS 20 be
ably honorable man n1 s man Yet something ID
!haa troe n oS As shsrtening the esnaoI o IN
I'd by Mooney held Lh.. not al received tat
Iarri ana r One that he receys s hat makes
1on ghss9 Oh here 81 80 900 on, o. an. zach
Bush s s9rvee he that Kssn ann ous by the
Mine ma ,n I slsnooo thought Is SAL indeed '''
I'm was an honorable uAn - no,-s Tie
som ,.ntr ha npered oy hsvin Prepsrri .o rna1
Tony sesrcn out lie made STRONG iHp'''''
y a r. ppcoRDER rNsTRUCTs THE JURY.
5chot t,o-a.r smvth began charge I'd lho jury ~
o'clock He 'r,e'e' no. TO s0"
r, roam Was pei fectiy quiet "hiie We Spa ~,
- IN a low nut distinct voice lie jury iiS''
ceved .n,vlr even the jarDr' VINO Was 'i'A' 20
ociety. ~, .,,,et.st heed Tue Recorder ssa' -
worthy think tnat may prSps ~ ,ns position to
OF near tnlnnent oil the Yu gill rrnenOor
II Del you nave o liens were eIcuied from .he
mbers ood rePua u ALONE nave selected as the IN
stween mru ho considered ny 10Y an. r-,t of tue
sRpng az ons eau cau the nss o., All
an and inI aai Trial hls e DO rn. learned
ID Mrs. ornry us iearnet associate ao ~. cra.ees
owrSy DeIscuve 10 secure facts 70 lay oe1sT 40
Merritt nave to c9nn.s CONSCIOUS OF having
re Tee rs"s that Unfair TO either ts S
" w s an; ns Wnen shall have coneluieo' IL" f
e pity jur,s DUTY to CONSIDER we You sSoud 70
health guided anow your 10 be anect,a ey t t
siIrr.tion Of the an s1nie ~. iefsudaurs family
wnni not ouly vioa Ito your duty a. '"0''
would violate your oa'n' "a ~ 1900,
uei IT.. pscoraer renewed the evidence as 10 TIC .
meeting and sau' 1870, ,h.r
W. -fcrs been a me-tius 81 sncn AL MA ,a.,aed
has re- those ~nS to tue for tue nernS ioI
In this the further fact tha ,ne'e Every railroad raI
guest Of OF Two sice ,re IN, B,arL ,o
Of re-, the facts you mrst nn no Won On
=.