Morning journal and courier., 1886-07-16

straightforward manner the dealings he had
 Wlth Walking Delegate Glidden He said:
 On the third day of last June MT. Glidden
 called upon ma at my place of business and
 attef much preliminary talking asked me if
 I took the COURIER 1 said that I took the
 COURIER and would continue to take it. He
 then said that there was boycott on the
 paper and told me that had no right to ad-
 vertise in it. replied that it was free
 country and I should advertise where pleased. furthertnofe told him that if he or the Knights of Labor had anything with the COURIER which they were fighting about, it was thelr business, not mine, and l should not meddle with their affairs. He then told me it would not be policy for me to continue my ad. He thought that we were taking a very foolish step. He said he m ight use one way to make us submit or he might use an other. He said the boycott was | sure to succeed; that they had accomplished their object with 1 the News and were positive that the CoUR- l TER also would give in. Nr. Glidden also made few remarks about one or two men | in the COURIER office, which do not recol- | lect now.
 1 Mir. Law withstood a cross-examination
 from the opposing counsel which did not shake his evidence
 Kelsey Jones, of the firm of A. Foote 6 | Co.,, fish dealers on State street, testified to 1 how a card with boycotted merchants | names on it was placed in his smoney draw | CT by his partner. The firms name was on l the card. MT. R. Foote testified that he got l the card from storekeeper next door, MT.
 J. Kehoe Mr. Kehoe was then called. He l said he found the card on his showcase and gave it to Mir. Foote. G. W. H. Hughes, the butter dealer of 34 1 Church street, testified next. He said: l | met MT. Glidden one day after the boycott l on the COURIER had commenced and he ask | I-xo- or,k Of Shn paper. He said that he was walking dele gate
 l MT. Abraham Silverthau of the firm of s. | Silverthau & Son, the Chapel street jewellers, | said that he had met MT. Glidden, the walk 1 ing delegate. The delegate came into his I told him that the COURIER had been I boycotted. He handed me paper \ which signed. The heading of the paper was: hereby agree not to advertise in the COURIER. signed the paper. He did not | state any particular length of tira9 which I should refrain from advertising in the paper Wr H. H. Lane was again called by Mr. filling. MT. Alling-Do you know whether the Workmen's Advocate is printed at the Stafford Printing company or nota Witness Yes believe it is. MT. Lane said the ! money with which the paper was published came out of the funds of the order.
 | Articles printed in the Workmen's Advo- cate against the COURIER were here brought in as evidence by Mr. filling. They were ruled out. Judge Stoddard said that he did not want to bring such stuff as was printed in the Advocate into the court as fit evidence. Judge Stoddard, in making his clos ing remarks, said: I hope the wit
 nesses on both sides may be on hand tomorrow early and promptly. The case has already taken considerable more time than expected. I shall endeayor to bring it to close as speedily as is consis- tent. The jurors will come prepared for all evening session tomorrow night
 The court at o'clock adjourned until 10 o'clock this morning. To-day will probably finish the witnesses for the State and the ac- cused, and perhaps the case may be given to the jury this evening.