Staunton vindicator. [volume] (Staunton, Va.) 1860-1896, 1886-09-17
Supreme Court of Appeals.
FIFTEEN DECISIONS DELIVERED YESTER-
DAY-TEN REvERsALs AND THREE
AFFIRMED,
The Court of Appeals met last Friday.
All the Judges are now present. The fol-
lowing is summary of the business:

PROCEEDINGS:
Iday FL DayJqdge W. W. Grump Pre-, Of
sented a petition for rehearing in his case.
Filed by leave and time taken to consider.
Petition for rehearing the case of Rinker Os.
The Bank of Winchester-decided at last term
here-fled and time taken to consider.
mandate from the United States Supreme
Court, reversing the decree of the Circuit Court
and the Supreme Court of Appeals OF Virginia
! given counsel to present further papers next
Monday.
Ogden Us. E. S. & j. 7. Brown, commission
ers, was heard on motion for new appeal, and
submitted.
Hood rs. Haden-from Botetourt. Ordered to
| be sent here from Richmond on rehearing.
| Robinson Us. Dinguid-from Amherst-was
dismissed for failure to print the record before
| lowed.
John W. Green Us. W. H. Ward and John 7.
| Hillafrom Alexandria Argued by S. Fergg-
| son Beach for plaintiff, and c. E. Stuart and &.
Kemper for defendants, and submitted.
f, Carrs Administrator as. Norris, receiver
Duke for appellant, and continued for further
hearing.
K. Kemper. ESQ.,, of Alexandria, was admit
| ted to practice in this court.
The Court adjourned to Monday.
receiver-from Albemarle. Continued to next
| term.
Virginia Midland Railroad Company Banks
dale, Admir-. Argued by c. M. Blackford for
appellant. and Duke q Duke for appel lee, and
submitted.
IMesdoy-Ihird Day.-Thos. Martins Admir- Us.
Fielder. Argued by John I. Coleman and Jno.
L. Davis for appellees, and submitted. +,,.,,,
Argued by R. T. w. Duke for appeilees, and
continued for further hearing.
RS. Parks, A. H: Davis, and Gesner b. Smith
qualified and admitted to practice in this court.
Wednesday-Fou,-th Day.-Argumenti in Smith
&c. Us. Flanagan, &c. Conducted by S.V. South
Danner u.s. Frederick, from Shenandoah. Ar
gued by M. L. Walton for appellants and II. G..
Allen for appellees, and continued for further
| hearing.
| DECISIONS YESTERDAY.
THURSDAY, Sept. 16, 1886. Appeal and Su-
persedeas granted upon petition ofP. Harmon
ct. ais, cause from Augusta, of Hounihan VS..
+ Harmon.
| Appeal and supersedeas granted on petition
! of D. A. Wits admir-, in cause from Nelson
of Warrick VS.. Warrick.
| Jacob P. Efinger VS.. Jas. Kinney, trustee,
mandate of U. S. Supreme Court executed,
reversing the decree heretofore rendered in
| the cause.
| j. W. Green VS.. W. Fl. Ward and J. T. Hill
from Alexandria. Opinion delivered by Judge
Lewis. Reversed.
Va. Midland r. R. Co. VS., Barksdales
| admir-. Opinion by Judge Lacy. Reversed.
| CASES HEARD AT wYTHEvILLE.
Grigsby VS.. Osborne. Opinion by Judge
| Lewis. Affirmed, except as to claim for i'm
provements
Darr's admir- VS.. Rohr. Opinion by Judge
Lewis Reversed.
Matheny VS.. Crocketts admir-. Opinion by
Judge Lewis. Reversed.
! Ayres' admir- vs. Burke. Opinion by Judge
! Lacy Reversed.
Dabney VS.. Shelton Opinion by Judgs
| Lacy. Reversed. II
Fire Association of Philadelphia VS.. Hog
wood Opinion by Judge Lacy. reversed.
Slaymaker VS.. Jaffray Co. Opinion by
Judge Lacy. Affirmed in part and reversed
and remanded as to rest.
Bruce VS., Stump. Opinion by Judge Lacy
| Affirmed. -, :. W..
Jas Fry VS.. The Commonwealth OF Va
Opinion by Judge Lacy. Affirmed.
| Gibboney VS.. Kent. Opinion by Judge
Fauntleroy. Reversed.
Parker vs. Logan & Co. Opinion by Judge
Fauntleroy. Reversed.
r A. G. Pendleton VS.. d. G. Miller. Opinion
| by Judge Fauntleroy. Peremptory mand aa
us ordered to restore petitioner to the once
&c, of Supt. of Schools of Smythe county
Poindexter VS.. Burrows. Opinion by Judge
Richardson. Reversed and remanded.