The Jasper weekly courier. [volume] (Jasper, Ind.) 1858-1922, 1886-10-08

~ . No. Tr,s1 - sne Condemned May
s,.rk~s mur<l~rrrs-Ihe CFounds Qpon
which she i,eG~n.e nely - Maintain
Ihels Reqas-s-Atleg~d Newly D.seo~
srea kvid~ne<-
Cnic<.a, Sept. 29.--Thc ailidaviss 20
support the motion for : new trial Tor
the seven condemned Anarchists have
been fled by their attorneys. The usual
plea b entered that the verdict = not
supported BY the evidence. and y u also
urred that the counsel Tor the State en-
plovcd I form Of Argument which was
calculated 70 prejudice she jury. The
chief point urged, however, - the story
s<iegraphed from indianapolis shortly
after the conclusion Of the trial, 20 the
eject that : man entered . drinking
saloon In that city one or two days before
the uay market massacre, and exhipltcd
: ~achel intimating that slaughter wnuid
. occur In Chicago In : few days. Inc
theory Of the defense r. that this mysteri-
Gus stranger had quantity OF dynamite
bombs. and that he u the person VINO ~
al likelihood threw the bomb into sne
ranks 81 the police The manner ~
which the jury was summoned, before
whom the defendants were tried, Is also
Following are the counts in the mo-
\ tion:
Tsere = 10 evidence In She record sup
rortinr o. justifyins said verdict
ssrucsions asked and given on beh-.. o. shs
pt I Inc Court erred In refusing % give sh .,
- asked xL
behalf Of the defendant and refused oy sn'
Court ..-<.,,.x
Incompetent. Irrelevant material testimony
offered on hehnif Of the people
4 The Court erred In excluding ccrtaii
testimony offered In behalf OF SAID uetenu
rbe trial Of she said cause was not hat
before. nor was the verdict therein rendered
oy.a Th e WIS ,nissonduct upon the part 0!
the officers OF the Law Ia the selection ana
~ummonlnx Of the jurors In said cau-r ~
are -r~ciri venires issued In said cause were
not i'm. nrtiai jurors, but chosen Will sptciA
reference 20 their known % supp,se1 ~ ~.
purp0-e ~ insurinE conviction 81 the &c
fendnnt- n said cause
.. Th~re = newly discovers s sn sss.
M the CLOSING argument OF the state A.
torney Vas impro2er ~ y. s 's.aarn \ 7,
=. sr,r,I- ~ the preiudiccs and passion
~ The Jury. In IL m--tatement- q the -
~nr- ani in ~ nbu-ivene>- toward the de
ssn.,,nr<. An having natural tendency 9
ml~Ieat the iary and prevent lar anu I'M
, partial verdict
- 10 TIE Qualifications OF jurors ana incl
4 competency. and IN refusing 90 allow he
fendants 20 ask ~ tile inror- certain Ins'
"A al,auir. 10 the state more than twent
perrmp.nry challenges IN the cansc I.
" The court erred "a m,dity,n< the !,
: strncs!ons asked in behalf of the defend
y IN me court erred In everything the me
{ tion 81 defendants spies. >cnwan, fts'ue
:, and <eebe for separate trial.
4 There were eight afiidavits flied IN SUI
port 81 the motion. John Sorreii ma
.didax,, that he was not an AnarchiS
arI liza on The sunday mornin. follow
inr the Attn ~ May he had heard Jurs
. Randall say. III reference 10 Spie
FISCHER. Fielden. Parsons and other
e that they ought 10 be hung
r The defendants themselves SET Tor
Jointly that. since their trial, certain e'
,lepce-<uch - the affilavits Of DE Lu'
q and reports 81 opinions expressed by Y
=. ;nrorS-ha< come TO their knowledge a.
y !. thev will be better prepared Tor secol
- defense
e. John Phillips De Luse, a salocn-keep
~ Al indianapolis. whose story was print
b n the papers At the tune ne first made
ID pub,ic. asserts and swears that at sew
o. o'c.ock on q morning in May Of this We
- An unknown man, wearing mnstac
"a and dressed In dark clothes, came 70
- place. and setting small satchei On !
bar. asked for drink Taxing his whist
~ the stranger said he came from ~
York and was on his way 70 Chica.
II Speaking briefly about the pending 'a'
trouble the stranger closed with the
MARI that the saloon-keeper wo'
q shortly hear OF trouble In Chicago. Poi
leE ing 10 his sacheI he continued: ~ h;
r. cot something in here that will wo
"; Won will hear Of IT," Turning At
In door a. he departed the unknown
" rhasized. s.you will hear Of u soo'
ID. Shortiy follonin. this episode the ne
~: III the Haymarket tragedy repched
In Lrse. The deponent appeals 10 {
tain Oscar Spnfh a. a witness 10
~trnurc conversation. and this individ
En- follows In an affidavit 20 the truth OF
- statement.
LIN Jacob 4. Deiler, OF Indianapolis. tc
ne De- that he heard Sputh tell on last
- nsdav .: the inciden, with DeLu'
Of strange customer back Ia May
the Thomas J. Morgan, q rcpnicd Social
ing declares that he heard Juror Dtnkcr
Vas AT don'i nake any difference whethe
the i like him or not, he and the whole 3
not ou.ht 10 be hanged" Morgan sw'
eri- thar Denker mndc this statement
Woodiawu on May In dispute conc
~, ing cerasn portrait Of Spies IN \
~. newspaper and It's resemblance 70
- original.
Thomas s. Morgan. the son OF
% foregoing deponent. uphoids the irut
'eit- his fathers AFFIDAVIT.
sitn The counsel for the defense promis
= q affidavit Ut an. early date impeac'
pwn Juror Cole.
Vas Ssate-Attorncy (srinnell, In speakin
ling the motion, said the impeachment Of
Nm Jurors will not avail. and that the
Luce AFFIDAVIT. which Is the main p
low Of new evidence - little more than
Get combe.
Their -
,blic a chief of Police Aeeu~ed % Hack
and NEW York. Sept. 2a.--Capsain vii
9 % r. Mahedy, chief Of the Sarasoga p
ne force. was arraigncd at Jefferson Ma
Win Police Conrt Yesterday morning