Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1886-12-07
EHE CAMPBELL CASE.
Dpfendant Placed on the Stand
and TestifIes in Detail Against
His Wife,
mike OF Argyle n Nyitness-what a
b,tective Did Not see-Lndy Collins
Threat To Her Husband.
1npn COLIN rALKs.


Threat 10 Her Husband.
LORD COLIN TALKS
hNpoN, Dec. G In the Campbell
ce case to-day Davis, the detective
was on the stand when the case adj
.npd Saturday, testified to shadowing
4 Coun Campbell aud the duke OF
shorough In Paris. He said he was
srlaIn whether the tall gentleman he
Seen walking with the plaintiff was
Stewart, the American millionaire or
4 The duke of Marlborough staid at
Ihotel wagram. wi ness never saw
A Colin there. Several spies were
HE trace of Lady Colin at the same
2uIe Brown, d servant, deposed to a
N.Y. Gen. Butler TO Lady Colin, and to
snslniug three hours. Gen. Butler,
ls occasion, when he departed went
stairs on tip-toe and let himself out
front door. Witness found pho
BIZ OF Gen. Butler under Lady
Is pillow and spoke to Lord Colin
&pbell about her. Witness was there
n dismissed by Lady Colin. Neptune
IA threw the boxes and luggage DO =
pg to witness into the street.
NAtson, cabman, testified that once
he was carrying Lady Colin and a
4eman he watched them and saw
K csressing like luvers. Lady Collins
N resting on the gentleman's shoulder.
less took plaintiff and her male com
Hon to house in Brook street. He
I'D outside an hour and a half for
"a Colin 10 take her home, and then
nrted without her.
solicitor, testified to an
&fview between Lady Miles and
M Campbell In November, 1884
N Miles threatened Lord Colin
q unless he withdrew proceedings
+. st Lady Colin she (Lady Miles,
produce evidence against him.
n ColinC4mpbell said he considered the
psals on behalf of plaintiff, as made
Ngh Lady Miles, dishonorable and
bfal and declined to accede to them,
: Miles then asserted distinctly that
cl OF adultery had been committed
I'd Campbell with Mary Watson.
duke Of Argyle was then called.
beet IN calling him was to have
sIe that ne disapproved Of the mar
\ Of his son to plaintiff. Mr. Rus
tpunsel for Lady Colin, produced a
dated August, 1888, from Lady
6 10 witness, In which she detailed
use Of the disagree ment with Lord
described his tyrany and persis-
+ IL Insisting in maintaining relation
Nth her des lite her opposition, be-
u his condition. The dukes re-
y that he considered the charges
aft bis son false, and believed that
W Collins letter was part OF
lem TO intimidate her husband.
IS declined to hold any further cor
Nhdtnce with her
Colin Campbell was next sworn,
NNsllrd IN the first time he met his
tas In September, 1880, at invernay,
Eel seat Of the Argyle family, and
Of Argyle county, Scotland. The
olance soon resulted in an engage
E Of marriage. He next saw Miss
IN London during October AT
tlme witness was suffering
M nstula, and an operation
performed upon him but
y on account of fever he had and
was aggravated by anxiety respect
Engagement. He was not suffer.
Any sense from an infections dis
Miss Blood IRE quently visited him
le was sent away ON voyage Miss
sent him letter in every mail La
Mieel, another operation was per
and II also was a failure. His
III opposition TO his engage
n was at this time
witness constant anxiety.
sknew before he married that Miss
was acquainted with The duke Of
Pfcugh, She told witness once she
tn TO the theater with her sister
efal others, including the duke OF
Pfough. Witness replied: "I don't
oa were In good company" Wit
n Known Chief Shaw long time
Ten Butler or DR.. Bird Witness
Tiled 20 Miss Blood in July, 1881
per following his doctors released
m the prohibition he had beer
psesuse OF his malady.
colin continuing, said he heard
saying at Argyle Lodge, his
London residence, that the duke
thorough had called az the lodge
said he did not know the duke
ness demonstrated with the plsin
hding out with Chief Shaw, ant
n Same violent. When witness wa'
y vafnemonth, Lady Colin left hin
. assigning any reason. Sh'
eined out and generally spen
sway, She never complained Il
mat their relations had any u
u her health. Witness had lon
iA his wife in December, 1881
Ae auke OF Marlborough and Chic
o2e then promised they shouli
~Ms her auy more. Witness an
!, = closed their relations in JuHe
, M tae afternoon Of the dav that Lao
y -N ga iutervit W with defendan
.eln came TO the witness room
Z trying and threw her srms aoou
H. and then she burne
his eyes the letter b
(. w her through Lady Miles
Y ~ no mention OF the fact that sh
wv copy Of T.. Witness had neye
pleiniih 20 use prscauiicr
nlvcuon. 10 July, 1858, whi
= Aecon House, witness aske
z spend the night in his compl
an. ~ refused De npbraided n
n ,. ssnaect win other msnAnd she b
violent, and she said 10 hin
Nv ne In the divorce court "
,sa .ss worst Of IT." The ease The