The Ohio Democrat. (Logan, O. [Ohio]) 1886-1906, 1886-07-31
Legal Notice.

Rachel l. Trowbridge and her husband,
Isaac y. Trowbridigc; WilminaC G. Hanse and
her husband, Williain Hansel,, who reside in
Campbell county, Tennessee; Mary a. Sher-
lock and her husband, Joseph sherlock, who
reside in Kansas City Mssouri; Thomas
Coleman and Harriet Coleman, his wife,
tioncrs, will take notice that n petition was
aied Med 9sanst in them lltn and others, on the 9th
Pleas, within and for the. County OF Hooking
and State of Ohio, by Martha f.. Bucking-
ham and Andrew b. BucSingham, and is now
ham and Andrew Il. Buckingham demand
partition of the following real estate, to-wit:
"The northwest quarter of the southwest
northwest quarter of Section No. thirty-five
(&5), township No. twelve Q2),rango No. six
teen (lGl, in the County of Hooking and
state OF ONO, containing eishty-two (S2) acres
"Also Lot No. four (i) in the same section,
township ana range, containing ten (l0) acres,
northwest quarter of section No. thirty-tive
go, township No. twelve (l2), range No. six
teen (l6), containing forty liO) acres, more or
less, and being n part of the said lands de-
scribed above, that the same came to one
Peter Courier, in his lifetime, by contract
and purchase from one Thomas Coleman, on
and said Courier took and entered into poses
sion of said tract of land, under said contract
and purchase at the time OF purchase, and
day of 1870, us near MS the
petitioners have been able to learn, paid said
Coleman the balance OF the purchase money
IN full Tor said tract of land and prepared and
handed TO said Thomas Coleman, ut Logan,
Ohio at the time of said payment II decd was
properly drawn for the conveyance of said
premises from said Coleman and wife to said
Courier, and said Coleman took said prepared
deed To his home then in jackson county,
ohio, for acknowledgment thereof by himself
and his wife; but that said Thomas Coleman
and wife Harriet Coleman neglected and
iiiilcd to make and deliver n deed for said
premises to the said Peter Courier, during his
lifetime, and have not, since his death, made
and delivered the same to the persons entitled
thereto, Tho said Peter Courier owned, held,
occupied and used said premises continuous
~ nom the day or 4, 1850, up to
the time of his death, In November, 1885, and
said tenants I'm common has since owned and
held sud promises by inhcritence from said
Courier, and are entitled To partition therein.
The prayer of tho petition Is that said Cole
man and wife may be decreod to make and
deliver proper deed for said tract OF land,
and that In default thereof the order of tho
Court stand ms and for such decd, to the end
that the title of the tenants In common of
snid tract be quieted aud made secure; and
thai partition of all the lands described I'm
petition may bo made, or II the same can not
be done without manifest injury, that then
such proceedings may be hnd in the promises
is are authorized by law; and the said above
named defendants are notified that they are
required TO appear and answer said petition,
ON or before the third saturday after the 18th
day OF September next
MAHrHA II. and
ANDREW Is. BUCK ISGHAM.
q. W Brphm, Attorney. 5nOt