The Eaton Democrat. (Eaton, Ohio) 1875-1903, 1886-08-05
LARGE OR SMALL FARMS.
h Cause and Remedy Of the Prese
Agricultural Depression.

terested a thinking, and consequently
there is no lack of opinions and sugges-
tons as to the causes and remedies for
the existing troubles. The variety of
these, however, leave the mind in as
great a quandary as before; for not only
is there variety, but considerable con-
flict of opinion. One man thinks the
farms are too large, another AYERS they
are too small; but the most frequent
opinion, and a true one in many re-
spects, is that the yield of the crops is
too small for the land under cultivation
and the expenses, and that what is
mostly wanted is an intensive culture of
the soil in which the greatest yield is
procured on the smallest area. 1t is
most difficult and at the same time a
most interesting subject for thought and
discussion.
1t is no new question which now agi-
tates the farmers over the whole civil
lied world. 1t has been coming up, has
been discussed, and has been dropped
at times during two thousand years
past. At the earliest period of a settled
organization, the elder Pliny made COM
plant that ''wide farming had ruined
Italy and the provinces" from which
we may easily gather that these farmers
were distressed by their Astounding and
pressing difficulties much as we are now.
Later the poet Goldsmith deplored the
accumulation of wealth and the decay
of men:
ell fares the land, to fastening ills a prey,
Where wealth accumulates and men decay"
And we to-day are told that the concen-
tration of wealth in comparatively a few
hands, and the poverty of the laborers,
are the cause of all our present dissatis-
faction. Bad as it all seems to be, and
hopeless of any permanent remedy, we
can recall from our memory, or find
records in history, both ancient and
modern, abundant examples of similar
or a worse state of things. In all these
| periods of depressed agriculture there
has been loud complaint that the large
farms were at the bottom of it. That
old philosopher and writer, William
Goblet, in his day, made this
charge in reference to the disas-
trous years, 1920 and 1921. when
wheat sold in England for 81
| cents a bushel. In his .'Rural Rides
he wrote: ''There is one farmer who
has nearly 5000 acres of land in his
hands; who has 1,400 acres of wheat
and 8 1000 acres of barley. He occupies
what wa once forty farms. Is it any
wonder hat paupers increaseP" The
logical sequence suggested hardly
seems clear, but yet it has occurred to
other thinkers, even in our own days,
| when the cheap wheat of the great
grain farms of the new Northwest has
| been charged as the cause of the low
prices which farmers have suffered
from. But, then, the owners of these
very farms have in their turn complain
ed that the still cheaper wheat grown by
the poor farmers of India has SO. reduced
their profits as to leave them without
any return for their capital invested,
and we see here these large farmers,
who employ a great many men and
hundreds of thousands of dollars in
their business, in the very same predic-
ament as the English landlords who are
getting no rent for their farms, which
are just now tenantless; but this condi-
ton is quite abnormal and far from be-
ing unprecedented, and is probably due
to some special but temporary causes,
which will pass away as in previous
cases, and prosperity will return as it
has done before.
We do not think the large farms have
any thing to do with it, OF that small
farms are more or less desirable now
than at any previous time, and regard
as a mistake the common expression OF
opinion that the cultivation of five OF
ten acre farms for special crops will lead
to a solution of the difficulty. tits only
about a score of years ago since a writer
with this belief urged in a small book
that ''Ten acres was enough to support
a farmer and his family But the idea,
when tried by a few persons who be-
lieved in it, was found impracticable,
except under special conditions, and ten.
acre farms have decreased in number
during this period, because it has been
found that a farm of one hundred to
two hundred acres really furnishes the
best opportunities for profitable culture.
1t should not be forgotten that we
are passing through the crisis or climax
of a change in industrial development.
If we look back through history WE
shall find similar circumstances in every
case of agricultural depression. The
disastrous period of sixty years ago
above referred to, vas the result OF
a long and most exhaustive war in Eu-
rope, which impoverished every nation,
and compelled the people to work under
enormous disadvantages in repairing
the wastes OF the thirty years previously.
The present condition is somewhat diff
ferent, as it is not the waste of war Sc
much, perhaps, as the waste of labor,
which IS really capital, in the vast ex.
pansion of industrial enterprises, rail.
roads, factories, ETC., which have been
built far beyond present necessities, and
the vast increase of debt which call fol
the payment of interest to persons who
do no productive work for the money
received. We have been going on toe
extravagantly and have been furnish.
ing ourselves with the facilities for do
ing more work than we can do, and we
have to 60 through a period of poverty
and depression until we can live up to
our new condition. 1t is not a matter
of large or small farms, but one of liv.
ing within our smaller means until we
can make our recent enormous invest
ments productive.
Farmers have no reason for despond.
ency. We are all, as it were, carrying
too much stock and have to pinch and
patch out to keep them alive until they
come into profit, when we shall reap
the benefit and the scale will oscillate
in the other direction. One way out is
to grow as large crops as we a at the
least possible expense and tide over the
present period by a strict economy and
untiring industry, and whether the farm
be large or small to avoid risky change
and do the best with it as it is. There
is no reason for dependency or com
plant, but every eason for hopeful.
ness and patience until the clouds roll
over and the sun of prosperity again
shines.-Henry Stewart, IN N. Y. Times.
"A college paper criticised recently
very severely the students who act as
walters in the SUNNI r hotels. 1t thinks
the practice is unworthy of young men
who expect to occupy an honorable po'
sition in the world. This, says the Bos.
ton Journal, depends upon the motive.